Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-05-1985 ~ rY covN~li% At DA 03 n 3 .x + d ~c+ l "tier 7 "u, AGENDA + CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March S, 1983 Joint Meeting of the City of Denton City Council and the Parks and Recreation Board on Tuesday, March S, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 P.M. 1. Receive a report on the Parks and Recreation Survey and Master Plan. 2. Discussion of a mandatory dedication ordinance. Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 6:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 6:00 P.M. 1. Discussion of City of Denton City Council strategic plan. 2. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V. A. T. S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V. A. T. S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D, Board Apppointments Under Sec. 2(tl), Art 6252-17 Y.A. T. S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March S, 19859 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building qt which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 11 Consider approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February S, 1985 and the Special Called Meeting of February 11, 1985. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff, and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the authorizesmmtheat City Manageral or tWs rodesignee ento implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Ana r.•ng ~i 1 ~a e y. S City of Denton City Council Agenda ' March S, 198S Page Two A. Bids and Purchase Orders: Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 4.A, 4.B, 4.C). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. 1. Bid 1 9403 - Herbicides/insecticides 2. Bid 1 9404 - Animal Control unit 3. Bid 1 9407 - Remote terminal unit 4. Bid 1 9408 - Air compressor S. Bid 1 9409 - Roof for new addition to the Municipal Building 6. Bid 1 9440 - Property to value City fixt-d assets 7. Purchase Order 1 66388 to Crane Packing Company in the amount of $3,226.40 8. Purchase Order 1 66959 w Interstate Equipment Rental in the amount of $3,260,27 9. Purchase Order 1 67002 to Heil Company in the amount of $3,244.71 10. Purchase Order 1 67080 to Boyd Excavation in the amount of $7,020.00 11. Purchase Order 1 67203 to Jagoe Public Construction Company in the amount of $27,375.00 B. Plats and Replats: 1. Approval of preliminary plat of the Fletcher's State Fair Corny Dog Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of preliminary plat of the Infinity Strata Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of preliminary plat of the Mack Park Addition, Biock 1, Lot 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda March S. 1985 Page Three 4. Approval of final replat of the Owsley Park Addition, Block 11, Lot 12A. (The Planning a1d Zoning Commission recommends approval.) S. Approval of final replat of the Thompson Addition, Phase I, Lot 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Approval of preliminary plat of Sunburst, Phase II. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Public: Hearings: A. Z-1701. This is the petition of Brian Kruger requesting a change in zoning from the multi-family (MF-1) classification to the planned development (PD) classification for office use at 614 West Hickory Street. The property is more particularly described as lot 3 of the McKennon Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) B. Z-1716. This is the ppetition of Charles Watkins, representing Denton -Tedi, Inc., requesting a change in the current zoning classification from residential single family (SF-7) to residential single family (S.c-10) on a tract of 6.714 acres situated in the F. Batson Survey, Abstract 043, Denton County. The said tract is part of a 44.10 acre tract being developed as Westgate Heights located east and adjacent to Greenway Club Estates. {'The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for art effective date. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in City of Denton City Council Agenda March 5, 1985 Page Four accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requiremtr,its of competitive bids; and providing for are effective date. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the eradication of established wild bird roosts which are inhabited by protected species of migratory birds by means of habitat modification. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing the existing Article 17 and other provisions relating to signs and reenacting a new Article 17 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City if Denton, Texas to provide for the regulating of signs and the permitting thereot; providing for a penalty not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200. 0) for violations thereof; providing for a severability clause; repealing all ordinances in conflict thereof; and providing for an effective date. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of the City of Denton for annexation of approximately 136.58 acres beginning approximately 500 feet east of the centerline of U.S. Highway 377 and south of Brush Creek Road (o-11). G. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of the City of Denton for annexation of approximately 93.67 acres beginning 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Highway 380 and east of Geesling Road (Capricorn Mobile Home Park and surrounding property) (A-13). H. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of R. 0. ;I.cDonnell for annexation of approximately 34.60 acres of land situated in the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, and beginning approximately 2S0 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of FM 426 and approximately 2,000 feet east of Mayhill Road FA-14), I, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings 17, vY R t Y t t r° f City of Denton City Council Agenda March S, 1985 Page Five regarding the petition of the City of Denton for annexation of approximately 42.3S acres of land being part of the S. Huizar Survey, Abstract No. 514, beginning approximately 500 feet north of and perpendicular to the center line of U. S. Highway 380 and west of Masch Branch Road (A-1S). J. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of Hammett $ Nash, Inc. and the City of Denton for annexation of a pproximatel 150 acres of land located west of Mayhill Road approxiaately 4,000 feet north of I-35 and beginning at the northeast corner of the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. 646 (A-17). K. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of Redditc. Investments Corporation for annexation of approximately 60.38 acres situated in the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and beginning adjacent and east of Edwards Road (A-18). S. Consider removing petition Z-167S from the table. 6. Z-1675. This is the petition of Christopher Bancroft requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 19.39 acre tract located on the south side of Parvin Road approximately 1,500 feet east of Bonnie Brae Road. If approved, the planned development will permit 71 lots for single family detached use (minimum lot size 7,000 square feet) and a two acre tract reserved for a private school. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 7. Consider approval of disposition of public property described as lots 9 and 10, Meadowbrook Subdivision, {north of Windsor Drive and west of Sherman Drive) D-39). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 8. Consider approval of disposition of approximately 17 acres of public property located in the M. Austin Survey, Abstract 40 (north of Spencer Road and east of Woodrow Lane) (D-40). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 91 Official A(tion on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters Be Real Estate C. Personnel D, Board Appointments City of Denton City Council Agenda ;March 5, 1985 Page Six 10. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1985 at J o' clock (a. M.) P. M.) CITY SECRETARY 1672C E7 AGENDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March 5, 1985 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March 5, 19850 at 5:30 p.m. in the civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 P.M. 1. Consider aP4~roval of a request from the Denton Independent School District to locate a new elementary school on the Briercliff park site C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above n.tice of meeting was postad on the bulletin board. at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the _ day of 11 f t l f~, 1985 at / ; .`~•J o' clock (a. m. ) p.m. r CITY-SE RETARY 16711C 1 r' ?1•wi~i! ti3 7777- „GBNDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DBNTON CITY COUNCIL March 5, 1985 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 5:1.0 p.m. in the Cavil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: S:30 P.M. i, Consider approval of a request from the Denton Independent School District to locate a new elementary school on the Briercliff park site C B R T I F I C A T 6 I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of 19he Cia~y of Denton, Texas, on the day of ( a. m. ) p. m. CrTY- EM1KKT 1679C Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation Denton State School P.O. Box 368 • Denton, TX 76202.0368 • 1817) 387.383L ~hIHM~ BurtIs R. Hollis Superintendent Gart~1yv E. Miller, M.D. (A M MI SSIoner December 17, 1984 Richard to Smi Ed.D, Acting Deputy C issioner Mental Retardatio ervices • Texas Department o ntal Health and Mental Reta ion P. 0. Box 12668--Capit 'tation Austin, TX 78711 Dear Dr, Smith: As you know, we leased about ten acres of our land to the City of Denton for a neighborhood park. The city made some good improvements, and there have been no problems with this arrangement. The Denton Independent School District (DISD) and the city are now asking for additional acreage along the fence behind 3riercliff-Estates and a~- jacEnt to the city park, (Please see the attach map). The City of Denton is working with Dimension Development Company who wants to develop the land bounded by I-35C, Jostens, Briercliff and Denton State School, as indicated on the map, The proposed street (curb and gutters) is the big question, It is not proposed as a through street; it would be 40' of street with 10' easement on each side. The DISD and city officials I have talked to say we can get the developerq to install a 6' chain link fence on that side of our property with access to the park if we want it. They also say the developers would probably build the asphalt road around our lake, which I have been wanting to do. The problem with the whole plan is the land across the road and behind Brier- cliff would be isolated, and also the possibility of more vehicle traffic, we might as well get prepared for the traffic because we are almost surrounded by developments and proposed developments, will you please consider this proposal with Legal, the Commissioner, nr whom- ever? I will, of course, be availeble for input if you want need it. r ` ~TTr'TA,''~S; r r Or. Richard L. Smith December 17, 1984 Page 2 The parties involved desire an answer as soon as possible, because the developers and DISO need to act as soon as possible. Sincerely, Burtis Hollis Superintendent cc; Cathy Campbell/MR Services-Legal, map enclosed Melodie Clemons/MR Services 4r. Robert T. McGee/DISD Aick Svela/City r ;'1 7 1.1 - aV flit 1'exus DeparU»enl i)f Menial ilcallh gild Menial Pvtaritaliun /y<<. I)cnlun Stale Sihool 11 0 li<ix '16M • Di ntun TX ' 1012'M08 • 8171.387•JhN N:. Jaylon Fincannon Deputy Commissioner Netetal Retardation Services P.O. lox 12668 Austin, TX 78711-2668 Richard L, Acting Depur Mental Retaes Texas Deparl Health and Menn P. 0. Box 1\2668--Ca Station Austin. TX Dear Dr. Smith: Thanks for responding to mqy request regarding the possibility or leasin a small u4act of our land to the Denton Independent School District (DISD? and a 63' street right-of-way to the City of Denton. My position on this issue is that we really have nothing to lose and much to gain by conv,ying this property to the city and DISD,' I do nut see the use of the said property by Denton State School (OSS) in the forseeable future. The property is pretty well isolated from the rest of our property by the lake, The following advantages to the clients of DSS and the State of Texas are anticipated: le The developer will agree to construct an all-weather road from our entrance road to our lake and around the lake. TW s will rake possible more use of the lake and the picnic areas around the lake, especially by our non-ambulatory and semi-ambulatory clients. It will also provide more places our trains can travel whon taking the clients for rides. 2. The developer will provide appropriate trees and landscaping along the fence bordering the street. They will also build berms (mounds of dirt) along the street to shield against noise. This would also give more privacy for the picnic area we are planning at the west end of the lake. 3. There will be designated park areas all along our west and north property line, ensuring that light industry and businesses will not be constructed there. z r= { ,;o.+r.J ;n+vi +ww r.-#eRrtia f rna ".:P .r .$Z X. ex Tv, Ri,hard L. Smith, Ed.D. January 3, 1985 Page 2 4. The Denton ISD will allow DSS to utilize any of the facilities constructed by them. This includes the all-purpose building cafetorium, playgrounds, and staff meeting rooms. 5. Dr. Robert McGee and I have discussed the possibility of sharing in-service training activities between our staff. 6. Special Education classes will be located in the building; and, as we begin sending our clients to public school, it would be convenient to both facilities. 7. The developer will deepen the lake on their property, which will prevent the flooding of our property as hay happened several times in the past five years. 8. The proposed street will intersect with the west extension of Loop 288 to Teasley Lane. This dill provide a convenient route for DSS staff to access Loop 288 and the Teasley Lane arcs of town. It will also help ease the traff'.. problem we are already experien- cing at the intersection of State School Road and I- We The only possible liahilities in leasing this land is that: 1. It w w1d be rather pennanently isolated fri„ the rest of our property. 2. The street traffic could create noise and also possibly hake our campus more visable and thus more 4andalism. Some folks said the city park on part of this pr-:,pert,y would also create problems, but it has rot to this point. In closing, I would like to say that this proposal would save taxpayers money and continue to create a good image of OSS and the State of Texas with the people of Denton and this area. Again, all involved in this matter will appreciate an answer as soon as possible. Sincerely, 4 4%_1414014--~ urtis Hollis Superintendent ,fib cc: Cathy Campbell-Central Office Sally Anderson-Central Office Wridie Clemons-Central Office Rick Svehla-City of Denton Dr. Robert MaGee-DISD AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March 5, 1985 Joint Meeting of the City of Denton City Council and the Parks and Recreation Board on Tuesday, March S. 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m. 1. Receive a report on the Parks and Recreation Survey and Master Plan. i 2. Discussion of a mandatory dedication ordinance. Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 6:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be c,)nsidered: 6:00 p.m. 1. Discussion of City of Denton City Council strategic plan. 2. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 Y. A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V. A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 62S2-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items rill be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 5, 1985 and the Special Called Meeting of February 12, 1985. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. City of Denton City Council Agenda March 5, 1985 Page Two A. Bids and Purchase Orders: Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 4.A, 4.B, 4.0. This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. i. Bid 0 9403 - Herbicides/insecticides 2. Bid # 9104 - Animal Control unit 3. Bid y 9407 - Remote terminal unit 4. Bid # 9408 - Air compressor 5. Bid # 9409 - Roof for new addition to the Municipal Building 6. Bid # 9400 - Property to value City fixed assets 7. Purchase Order # 66388 to Crane Packing Company in the amount of $3,226.40 8. Purchase Order 1 66959 to Interstate Equipment, Rental in the amount of $3,260.27 9. Purchase Order N 67002 to Heil Company in the amount of $3,244.71 10. Purchase Order N 67080 to Boyd Excavation in the amount of $7,020.00 11. Purchase Order 1 67203 to Jagoe Public Construction Company in the amount of $27,375.00 d. Plats and Replats: 1. Approval of preliminary plat of the Fletcher's State Pair Corny Dug Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of preliminary plat of the Infinitv Strata Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 31 Approval of preliminary plat of the Mack Park Addition, Block 11 Lot 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) i i 'I 'Fa c•e,. p, ' ~ i~ Tt ~S P ~k' t,' S,t ~N;i' ~ • r ~ City of Denton City Council Agenda March 5, 1985 Page Three 4. Approval of final replat of the Owsley Park Addition, Block 11, Lot 12A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Approval of final replat of the Thompson Addition, Phase i, Lot 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Approval of preliminary plat of Sunburst, Phase II. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Public Hearings: A. Z-1701. This is the petition of Brian Kruger requesting a change in zoning from the multi-family (MP-1) classification to the planned development (PD) classification for office use at 614 West Hickory Street. The property is more particularly described as lot 3 of the McKennon Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) B. Z-1726. This is the petition of Charles Watkins, representing Denton-Tedi, Inc., requesting a change in the current zoning classification from residential single family' (SF-7) to residential single family (SF-10) on a tract of 6.714 acres situated in the F. Batson Survey, Abstract 143, Denton County. The said tract is part of a 44.10 acre tract being developed as Westgate Heights located east and adjacent to Greenway Club Estates. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. B. Consider adoption of an ordinanco accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. Co Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in [ s717 , f y 71 ( 1 I , ' ..l 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda March 5, 1985 Page Four accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requ'.,rements of competitive bids; and providing for an effective date. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the eradication of established wild bird roosts which are inhabited by protected species of migratory birds by means of habitat modification. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing the existing Article 17 and other provisions relating to signs and reenacting a new Article 17 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas to provide for the regulating of signs and the permitting thereof; providing for a penalty not to exceed two hundred dollars 0200.00) for violations thereof; providing fcr a severability clause; repealing all ordinances in conflict thereof; and providing for an effective date. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of the City of Denton for annexation of approximately 136.58 acres beginning approximately SOO feet east of the centerline of U.S. Highway 377 and south of Brush Creek Road (A-11). G. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the dace, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of the City of Denton for annexation of approximately 93.67 acres beginning 3S0 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Highway 380 and east of Geesling Road (Capricorn Mobile Homu Park and surrounding property) (A-13), H. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of R. 0. McDonnell for annexation of approximately 34.60 acres of land situated in the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, and beginning approximately 250 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of FM 426 and approximately 2,000 feet east of Mayhill Road A-14). 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings City of Denton City'Counc.l Agenda March S, 1985 Page Wive regarding the petition of the City of Dentc i for annexation of approximately 42.35 acres of land being part of the S. iluizar Survey, Abstract No. 514, beginning approximately 500 feet north of and perpendicular to the center line of U. S. Highway 380 and west o; March Branch Road (A-15). 3. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of Hammett $ Nash, Inc. and the City of Denton for annexation of approximately ISO acres of land located west of Mayhill Road approxiamtely 49000 feet north of I-35 and beginning at the northeast corner of the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. 646 (A-17). K. Consider Adoption of an ordinance sitting the date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of Redditch Investments Corporation for annexation of approximately 60.38 acres situated in the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and beginning adjacent and east of Edwards Road (A-18). 5. Consider removing petition Z-1675 from the table. 6. Z-1675. This is the petition of Christopher Bancroft requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 19.39 acre tract located on the south side of Parvin Road approximately 19500 feet east of Bonnie Brae Road. If approved, the planned development will permit 71 lots for single family detached use (minimum lot size 71000 square feet) and a two acre tract reserved for a private school. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 7. Consider approval of disposition of public property described as lots 9 and 10, Meadowbrook Subdivision, (north of Windsor Drive and west of Sherman Drive) (D-39). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 8. Consider approval of disposition of approximately 17 acres of public property located in the M. Austin Survey, Abstract 4, (north of Spencer Road and east of Woodrow Lane) (D-40). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) `J. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments City of Denton City Council Agenda March 5, 1985 Page Six 10. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. C E R T I 1: ? G A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1985 at o' clock (a. m.) {p. m.) CITY SECR)ITARY 1672C ^'-y J 4 ..n x~ n -k-'-w ST?..te5, J ~o a ! 1 . 'titp r "f u a f.+ M $ :1, DATE: CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: Report on Parks and Recreation Survey/Master Ple,i RECOMMENDATION: N/A SUMMARY: I Dr. Bob Rossman and Dr. Susan Hudson will be reviewing a survey which was completed by their department for the Parks and Recreation Department. BACKGROUND: This survey was conducted to take Parks and Recreation Master Plan recommendations and test them against public opinion. PROGRXM S, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTLD. N/A F ISCAL IMPACT: N/A RespeuljX su i ted: G. Chris liartun City Manager ,Pfe • ed by• Name Steve Brinkman Title Director, Parks and Recreation Ap d: ~k' Name tty cKean Title j,~sistant City Manager S1+{,'~'~.;4 f'Sy.daN + 3 is v 40 d P DATE.. CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO,. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: Discussion of Naridatory Dedication Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: N/A SU4.4 AR Y: The Parks and Recreation Board and staff will discuss the philosophy and objectives of a mandatory dedication ordinance. BACKGROUND: The dramatic growth in Denton makes it necessary to determine whether new neighborhood parks should be financed from the general fund or paid for by developers as in the fashion they provide streets, utilities, etc. The Texas Supreme Court has recently ruled that in itself mandatory dedication of land for parks is constitutional. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED. N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Respectfully submitted: City Manager P red b . ame Title Apr Yed: Name Title -11-T k 17 WrVofDEWON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS I6201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of the Council FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manag,ar DACE: February 28, 1985 SUBJECT: Discussion of the City of Denton Strategic Plan Since the discussion on the City of Denton Strategic Plan was tabled at the February 19, 1985, City Council meeting, it has . been rescheduled for the March S, 1985, work session. Enclosed is the memorandum wh ch presents an outline for the discussion of the plan, along x.th a copy of the 1984 Staff Retreat Goals as back-up material. Please bring copy of the Strategic Plan to the March 5, 1985, meeting, as it has not been included In the agenda. If you do not have a copy of the plan, please call our office at 566-8307 or 566-8306. etty c e Assistant City Manager lj Attachments 2147M • ~ ; : xy ,:,r Fs . e iv r 1 , .bc '.,•v'G'' .rr f.'. i WYODEWON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of this City Council FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager DATE: February 12, 1985 SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE A discussion of the City of Denton Strategic Plan is scheduled for the February 19, 1985, work session. Enclosed for your convenience prior to the discussion are both the February 1, • 1985, draft of the Strategic Plan and the City of Denton 1984 Staff Retreat Goals (green insert). The following is a proposes agenda for discussion during the scheduled work session: 1. To determine if the Mission Stdtement of the Strategic .Ian needs to be further expanded or refined so that it uniquely reflects Denton's direction. 2. To solicit direction from the City Council in addressing the thoroughness of the Data Base (second section) for making future planning decisions. 3. To assess the extent to which the Strategic Plan 1984 Goals (last section in the document) are realistic and continue to be considered priorities in light of the new information supplied in the Data Base and long range financial forecasts. 4. To establish target dates for the 1984 Strategic Plan Goals, S. To consider the possibility of incorporating the enclosed City of Denton 1984 Staff Retreat Goals (green insert) 777 V ..F 77 Mayor and Members of the City Council Febr»ary 12, 1985 Page Two into the Strategic Plan in order to provide intermediate goals between the Mission Statement and more specific objectives and action steps. Discussion at this work session will primarily attempt to consider the above. We would like to focus on the sections of the Strategic Plan regarding strengths, weaknesses, and assumptions at a follow-up meeting. We will be discussing the format of that follow-up meeting (i.e., study sessions, workshop, retreat, etc.). If you have any questions regarding this material, please do not hesitate to contact me. Betty McKead Assistant City Manager 1) • 2123M Enclosure O CITY OF DEWON 1984 STAFF RETREAT GOALS 1. Goal: Develop a problem salving, results oriented, and responsive City work. force. II. Goal: Provide and promote leisure and educational opportunities. III. Goal: Ensure high standards in the provision of municipal facilities and services. IV. Goal: Protect life and property. • V. Goal: Plan and encourage balanced development of the community. VI. Goal: Ensure a financially sound and stable City govern- ment. VII. Goal: Operate City government openly, fairly, and equitably. VIII. Goal: Promote and encourage community Dride and iivolvement. 77 0 OTD City Council Minutes February 5, 1985 The work session of the City council on Tuesday, February 5, 1985 at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Muncipai Building. PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tam Chew; Council Members Alford, McAdams, Riddlesperger, Hopkins and Stephens ABSeNT: None The following items were considered: 11 The Council received a report on the public address system in the City Council Chambers. Steve a Director Parks d the u theexistingspeakersystem hadbeen adjusted. He was looking into alternative systems with different microphones. Brinkman said they were installing an auxiliary microphone. He stated the current system is sound, but that it was at maximum output. He asked for input from the Council on how to proceed. Mayor Pro Tem Chad said that it was W ficult to hear from one end of the City Council table to the other. Council Member Hopkins asked if fixing the speaker system had been budgeted for. Brinkman replied that we have redirected the speaker, the problem with the microphone is that the speaker has to be right on top of them to be heard. The microphone stands are to small to adjust. Council Member Stephens said that with notebooks on the stand it is hard to get close to the microphone. Mayor Stewart asked about the possibility of purchasing microphones which would attach to their clothing. Brinkman answered that it was a possibility. It had been done once, and it was discontinued because the microphones picked up private conversations between council members. Council Member. McAdams asked about being able to get microphones with flexible necks which cuuld be brought closer to the speaker. Brinkman said that was also a possibility. Betty McKean, Assibtant City Manager, said that the flexible microphones cou W place a barrier to the vision of tha people in the audience. The group discussed how is deal with microphones that would clip on to clothing. Council Member Stephens suggested having an on-off switch on the microphones. Council Member Alford said that the microphones could be taken off when tha council memaer wanted to have a private conversation, but it would look too obvious. Council Member Stephens asked about the cost to have a Sound Engineer come in and look at the system. He also asked what kinds of things would require a sound engineer and which could Building Maintenance do themselves. Brinkman said they could change the microphones them- selves. If more speakers were needed a sound engineer would have to be brought i:;. Assistant City Manager 3etty McKean said that she p!sferred to experiment with different mikes, before installing more speakers. Council Member Stephens said that it is frustrating to the people uno come to attend Council meetings, when they cannot hear what tnb Council Members are saying. Mayor Pro Tem Chew said he would like to see a clip on microphone with an on-off switch. Council Member McAdams said she did not like thr clip on microphone, she wanted adjustable microphone standa. City Manager, Chris Hartung said ad)-ietatis microphone stands with and on-off switch were used in the City o! garland, the Council Members would turn the mikes off and not turn them back on ag+in. Brinkman said this could be done, he could get some on loan I:•, try out. Hopkins and Chew agreed, as along as the pl,ople in the back could hear the Council and the Council Memberr a'. one end could hear the one at the other and, that adjustable Stands would be fine. Council Member Hopkins suggested that a aicrephone be placed in the back or middle of the room got speaker:o who come from the audience so that they would not have to wall, to the front. City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February 5, 1985 Page 2 2. The Council convened into the Executive Session. The Council then convened Into the Regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Stewart: Mayor Pro rem Chewt Council Memoers Alford, McAdams, Riddlespergec, Hopkins, and Stephens ABSENT: None The following items were considered: 1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 8, 1985. Stephens motion, McAdams second to approve the Minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. The Mayor presented a Proclamation honoring League of Unites Latin Amercan Citizens (LULAC), which was accepted by Frank Davilla, President of LULAC. 2. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Managar or +his designee implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Bids and Purchase Ocders: Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 4.A, 4.8, 4.0, This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. 1. Hid 1 9329A - Janitorial F_ n ices 2. Bid 1 9382 - Truck/Cab Chassis - Dump Bodies 3. Bid 1 9387 - Loader Backhoe 4. Bid 1 9388 - Landfill Bompactor 5. Bid i 9392 - Track Type Front-End Loader 6. Bid 1 9395 - Miscellaneous Pool Equipnent 7. Bid 1 9196 - Turf Fertilizer 8. Bid 1 9397 - Evaluation or Alarm System 9. Bie 1 )398 - 30 Yard Containers 10. Bid 4 9101 PVC Conduit 11. Bid 1 9399 - Paving Improvements - Prairie and Robertson street 12, Purchase Order 1 66842 to Boyd Excavation in the amount of $7,020.00 134 Purchase Order 1 66583 to Boyd Excavation in the anluunt of 17,0?.0.00 City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February 5, 1985 Page 3 B. Plats and Replats: 1. Consider approval of final replat of Cooper Crossing, Section I. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Consider approval of preliminary and final replat of Golden Triangle Industrial Park, Phase V. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Consider approval of final replat of the Haywood Addition, Block IF Lot 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4, consider approval of preliminary replat of the Owsley Park Addition, Block 2, Lot 12A. j (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Extension to the Sauls Addition, Block 1, Lots 8 and 9. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Consider approval.of preliminary plat of the Stauver Addition, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 7. Approval of preliminary replat of the Thompson Addition, Phase i, Lot 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 8. Approval of preliminary plat of the Wocodhill Square Retail Center. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 9. Approval of final replat of independence SquarF. Lot 1-R, Block A. (The P nkng and Zoning Commission recommends apprv.tl.) C. Tax Refund: Consider appruval of a tax refund to Nowlin Mortgage in the amount of $678.31. Council Member Chew stated ne was pleased to motion to accept the Consent Agenda as is, particularly the ite,is of paving improvements on Prairie and Robertson Streets, whew motion, McAdams second to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. motion carried unanimously. 1. Public Hearings A. H-34. This is the petition of Mrs. Robert S. Berg requesting historic landmark (HI designation at 104 North Locust Street. The property is more particularly described as part of Lot 5, Block 7, of the original Town Addition. (The Planning and toning Commission recommends approval.) The Mayor opened the public hearing. Speaking for the petition was Mrs. Robert S. Berg, the owner of Locust Street Grill. She raid that the building was built in the late 1800's and early 1900's. City of Denton City Council Kiautes Meeting of February S, 1985 Page 4 Council Member Riddlesperger asked if the front of the building was restored or rebuilt. Mrs. Berg answered that from the I-beam on up it was the same. Below the I-beam she said, it had been changed several times. The architect rebuilt the front similar to the style of the times. Council Member Alford asked if there were any pictures of the original building. Mrs. Berg said that none could be found. Council Member Riddlesperger said that what Mrs. Berg had done was commendable, but that he had some reservations about the historic landmark designation. He would like to have seen the building restored instead of rebuilt. Speaking against the petition was Tom Polk Miller. Mr. Miller as a member of the Historic Landmark Commission, Mr. Killer asked for a clearer definition of 'nistorlc landmark' he stated that his impression of historic landmark was something that preserved the past for the future. The 104 North Locust Street building is only a remodeling job and people cannot make up for losing the past by instantly creating a landmark. Mr. Miller said that a landmark should be the same as what it had been in the past. Mayor Pro Tem Chew asked if the criteria foe historical designation were met. The first criteria was that it would be owned by Denton residentsp the second is that it would be in the downtown district of Denton] third it captured the architectural tradition. Mayor Pro Tem Chew said that he had a question, as to whether it held to the architectural tradition. Me, Miller said he did not think it did. Mayor Stewart asked Mr. Miller why there was a historic landmark plaque at the furniture story on the northwest corner of the square. Mr. Miller replied that it was given by the State Historical rommisslon, indicating a site, not a building. Council Member Riddlesperqer asked if the Boyd Building, Lawyer's Title, and Ellington's were restored or rebuilt. Mr. Miller said that Boyd's was a restoration, Lawyer Title's upper half was similar to what it was originally, and Ellington's was a new fabrication. Each of these buildings has received a historic landmark designation. Mr. Miller sa.d that ne felt that there are many members of the Historic Landmark Commission who believe that they had made a mistake with the LiOyer's Title building and Ellington's. Mayor Pro Tem Chew as-ed why the same mistake should be made over again. Mr. Mi let said that standards should be tightened up before ano.her inappropriate building is designated as a historic lantnark, thereby d:iuting the appeal of the designation. Mayor Stewart asked Mr. Miller if he spoke for the Historic Landmark Commission. Mr. Miller said he was speaking only for himself. The petition was passed 3-2 and he was one of the two who voted against it. Mayor Pro Tem Chew said that there was no recommendation for a nistorlc landmark. Council Member Hopkins said that only those buildings that visitors come to look at and see what Denton's past was should be designated as a historic landmark. Council Member Alford asked if the interior of the building was original. Council Membor Riddlesperger asked what would be done to restore it. Mr. Miller said that evidence must be found of what the building may have looked like and efforts made to restore the building close to its original appearance. Council Member Hopkins asked about the ,comer Sly house, Mr, Miller said that lots of research went into what structural material was on inally used. Council Member Alford said that tht upper story in Lawyer's Title Building and Locust Street is 77 2 City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February 5, 1985 Page 5 Grill were both new. Mr. Miller said the original wall above the I-beam does not validate what is below. He stated that it is not possible to create a historic landmark that was not there. Mrs. Berg told the Council that the decision on the Locust Street Grill would be a heavy duty for them to consider. She stated that if this building was not given historic landmark designation there would be nothing to stop her from selling her building if a developer came In and wanted to buy it in order to knock it down. She said that there would not be anything to save downt.)wn from looking like another mall. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Mayor Stewart left the room. Denise Spivey, Dr elopment Review Planner, said that out of 17 reply forma mai..Jj one was in favor and zero in opposition. Spivey said that the petitioner's request contains several justifications for historic landmark designation: A couple of the most prominent citizens of early Denton, such as Otis Welch and Joseph Carroll, were Involved In the ownership of the original building; the location of the building Itself in the downtown areal and the architecture of the building itself. Spivey said-the architecture of the building was original from the top of the roof to the windows, While the current facade is not an exact replica of the one existing in earlier years, .he owners and some of the Historic Landmark Commission feel that it is a good faith effort to recreate the style of the late 180013. Council Member McAdams said that she was concerted about the criteria. Council Member Hopkins said the guidelines set before by the Historic Landmark Commission should be followed. Council Member Riddlesperger said he agreed that there was a good faith effort, but this item needs a further look, Alford motion to approve, motion died for lack of a second. Council Member McAdams expressed concern about the historic landmark process. Council Member Riddlesperger said that he did not want to discourage people from doing the type of work the Berge have done on the square. He said that he would second the motion to table with the understanding that the Council ought to work on Chia proposition to get a better consensus as to how they want to encourage people to do work on the square. Council Member Hopkins said that he wanted to table it on the understanding that they get specific criteria under which this item would fall. He set a time limit of three months. Hopkins notion, Riddlesperger second to table the item. Motion carried unanimously. B. I-1716. This is the petition of Melvin Gouge (realtor), representing Lela Sparkman (owned, requeeY,Ang a change in the current zoning classification from agricultural (A) to office (0) on a tract of 7,5 acres situated south of and abutting U. S. Highway 3800 east of Egan Road, and being the most southern portion in the southwest corner of the Thomas Egan Survey, Abstract 106. If approved, the said tract of land may be used for any of r,he purposes permitted in the zoning ordinance of the City of Denton. The Mayor Pro rem opened the public hearing. Melvin Gouge spoke in favor of the petition, He Said that he is requesting the change In order to build a small one story office building for an eye clinic, with parking provided for clients, a. J. V1, City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February 5, 1985 Page 6 No one Spoke in opposition. The Mayor Pro Tem closed the public hearing. Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner, gave the staff report. Persaud said that the site is located in a moderate intensity center which is relatively undeveloped and far below planned capacity in terms of intensity standards. The site is within the area controlled by the Airport Zoning Act, but outside of the restricted noise contours of 90 CNR. Persaud said that the Planning and Zoni:g Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval in the January meeting. i. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance changing the current zoning classification from agrlr.nltural (A) to office (0) on a tract of 2.5 acres situated south if and abutting U. S. Highway 380 and east of Egan Road. (rhe Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) The following ordinance was considered: N0. SS-21a AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 2.5 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE THOMAS J. LOAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 406, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOTTED SOUTH OF AND ABUTTING U. S. HIGHWAY 380, EAST CF EGAN ROAD, AND BEING THE MOST SOUTHERN PORTION IN rHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS EGAN SURVEY: TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISrRICr CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO OFFICE '0' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY: AND DECLARING AN r9FECfIVE DATE. Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roil call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Hopkins 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. C. Z-1117. This is the petition of Burt Singleton requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) district for light industrial (LI) uses on an approximately 91.3 acre tract in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330. The property is locatPO on the east side of Mayhlll Road a-iproximateiy 1600 feet south of FM 426 (East McKinney Street) and is more particularly described as Tracts 1F, 1F1, 1C, lA and lE of the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 13304 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) The Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearing. Pablo Rubio, engineer, spoke in favor of the petition. Rubio said that he was representing Burt Singleton. He said that he had studied the property and there were 39 acres in the flood plain. He said that 18.3 acres can be reclaimed from the flood plain with a cost of around $4008000. The client, said Rubio, said that he had no problem in making those improvements. Council Member Hopkins asked if the developer is willing to spend the money to make the improvements. Rubio said that he was. The Mayor Pro Tom closed the public hearing. City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February 5, 1985 page 7 Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, said that this site is located in a high intensity area where little or no control of intensity is proposed. The request is consistent with Denton Development Guide policy of prohibiting residential development within 2,500 feet of the Wastewater Treatment plant. The mayor returned to the meeting. McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the petition. Motion carried unanimously. D. 2-1720. Tr,is is the petitio'i of R, J. Button requesting a change in zoning from th( agricultural (A) district with a specific use permit for a mobile home park to the general retail (GRI zoning district on a 2.9 acre tract situated in the Stephen Hembrie Survey, Abstract 643, The property is located at the northeast corner of Robinson Road and FM 2181 (Teasley Lane). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) The Mayor opened the public hearing. R. J. Button spoke in favor of the petition. He said that staff had some questions about the fact that the area had been changed from a medium to a : Pw intensity area. He said that the tract was not previously toned when the rest of the lend was zoned for a nobile home park, because instead of zoning iC on speculation, it was better to wait for the need. The type of business which would be put in would be a convenience store, possibly a pizza take-out, dry cleaners, and that type of supportive businesses for the development. Button said that he extended a rater line from John Knox Vi11:.gs down RyAn Road to the mobile home park and for another $20,000, extended the 8 inch water line a:ross the front of the park and the proposed zoning tract. The sews has been laid out in such a way as would serve this tract of land, Mr. Button distributed brochures oii the project which showed that if this request were denied, it would be difficult to develop the small tract of land, So one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner said that out of three reply forms mailed out, one came back in favor, taro in opposition. This site is located in a low intensity area. The centon Development Guide has a policy which specifies that concentrations of retail in low intensity areas should be limited to four acres. This development is 2,9 acres, which falls within those parameters. However, the Planning and Zoning Commission has approved a mixed use planned development at the southwest corner of :cyan Road and Teasley Lane that contains four acres of general retail zoning. This will come before the Council shortly. tf both these petitions are aoproved, this will be seven acres of retail. Hopkins motion, Chew second to approve the petition. motion carried unanimously. B. 3-1721. This is the petition of Alpha Joint Ventures requesting a change in zoning from the single family IS?-7) district to the planned development (PD) classification on a 4.4 acre tract situated in the Alexander Hill Survey, Abstract 623, The property is located at 1213 Bernard Street@ if approved, the planned development will permit the construction of fifty-four (54) townhome units. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) r City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February 5, 1985 Page 8 The Mayor opened the public hearing. George Hopkins spoke in favor of tte petition. He stated that the development would consist vc clusters of townhomes with easy parking access. He added that there were adaquate sewer lines in the area but tha: they are overloaded and the developer has agreed to install, at nis cost, additional sewer lines. The entire project is reasonable and primarily for family use. Mr. Hopkins introduced Jack Dimond who is associated with Alpha Joint Ventures. Mr. Dimond said this is a single family development by a developer with 30 to 40 years of experience. It fits into the single family nature of the neighborhood, which is a private nelghborhuoA with generally new developments, which promote pride in ownership and rehabilitation. These will be owner occupied units with only 20 percent or less owned by investors. Thir Stipulation has been put on these units. This request is for a moderate density project at the top end of the single family density. It is a nigh quality project because of the cost of the land. It is not restricted from students, but because of the cost and the quality of the townhomes it is not geared to student living. Council Member McAdams asked if a student who would live in these homes with another student would be an investor or owner. P.C. Dimond acid they go under Fannie Mae Guidelines (FNMA). Unless the student can sign by himself without a co-signer he cannot buy. Owners are generally a better risk than investo-s. Mayor Pro Tom Chew mentioned that several Council Members understand Fannie Has Guidelines. Council Member MCA9ams said her concern was the traffic overload. Mr. Dimond said that his competition marketed housing to students, but they do not nave covered parking, pool and some of the other ammenitles he offers. This development is not marketed for students. Also speaking in favor of the petition was C. L. Hunt, who owns property next door to where the property will come out on Bernard Street, at 1211 Bernard. He said that the traffic for this development would enter near nis house. Hunt said that he was against commercial buildings, but that small houses recited to students in the area would be no more populated then letting this man develop it. If it were left open it would rroduce very little tax revenue. He is in favor of the developer putting up money for the sewer system. Mr. Hunt said the traffic is bad anyway, even if the area were left as is. Speaking against the petition was Orville O'Rear, owner of the adjoining property. Mr. O'Rear Bald that traffic was unreasonable in the area and that his mother also lives in the area and has problems with traffic. There are apartments all the way to Greenlee Street and one-way traffic going by the freeway, RugardJ•,g the aeveloper's claim that there would be twelve families to an acre, he said that his place was built in 1/2 acre, and that he couldn't see putting that kind of development in the aria, Bill O'Rear, the brother of Orville O'P,ar, spoke against the petition. He Stated that these developments look like apartments to nim, He moved to Denton it. 1936, and does not think apartments are needed in nis neighborhood. His mother is irritated at the traffic. George Hopkins said these wore common wall buildings, not apartments, the effect on traffic in the area would be minimal. Hopkins said that this is a reasonable project. The Mayor Closed the public hearing. City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February S, 1985 Page 9 Out of 23 reply forms mailed, eight came back in favors zero in opposition, and six in favor who were not on the list. Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, said that this tract is located in a low intensity area designated by the Denton Development Giiide. Based on existing zoning, this Intensity area is already over the standard by approximately 17 percent. The Denton Development Guide recommends as a matter of priority the need to protect existing housing stock. Low and moderate income people should have protection of their quality of life. The proposed development with a density of 12 units per acre is much more consistent with existing neighborhood patterns than a previously planned project (with 16 1/2 units per acre) to the north of this site. The Development Guide specifies that medium density nousing concentrations require at least one access by a collector sized street. Phis site abuts Bernard Street, a residential street currently loaded to capacity. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval by a vote of f-! despite policy violations as it represents a good faith effort to maintain the residential character of the neighborhood. Council Member McAdams said she hopes that we did not do something to open up the property on either side to multi-family or higher density zoning. This may influence the next development coming up. Council Member Hopkins said this siti:ation has more in common with the existing neighborhood than anything that has come before the Council previously. He also shares Council Member McAdams' concern. Chew motion, McAdams second to approve the petition, Motion carried unanimously. 1. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipments supplies or servicess providing for the expenditure of funds therefore= and providing for an effective date. The following ordinance was considered: NO 95-22 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND ANARDIN3 A CONrRACT FOR TH? PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR 3rRVICES: PROVIDIN:; FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS TbIAEFOAO ANT. PROVIDING FOR AN EFFEC'rivE DATE. Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams says,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'ayes' Riddlesperger 'ayes' Chew 'aye,' Hopkinc 'aye,' and Stewart saye.' MotLon carried unanimously. The Mayor called a 5 minute break. The meeting was adjourned. ins Mayor called the meeting to order, a. m e Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvementsr providing for the expenditure of funds thereforer and providing for an effective date. The following ordinance was considered: I~ l i City of Denton City Council minutes Meeting of February 5, 1985 Page 30 NO. 85-23 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPE'rIrIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTSI PROVIDING FOR TdE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS rHEREFOREt AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Cnew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens •aye#• Alford `ayes' Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' and Stewart 'aye.' Notion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance for the expenditure of funds for emergency putchaaes of materials, equipment, supplies or services In accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bidst and providing for an effective date. Tne following ordinance was considered: NO. 85-24 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR TJ3 EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIFS OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIRSOENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDSt AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stepn-ns 'ayes' Alford 'ayes' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Cnew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye. Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from agricultural (A; to light industrial (LI) on a tract of 1.530 acres situated soith of U. S. Highway 380 and commencing approximately 10140 feet east of Masch Branch Road 42-17131. Mayor Stewart informed the audience this ordinance has been discussed in City Council meetings several times, and this is merely the formality of the approving of the ordinance. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 85-25 AN ORDINANCE AME140ING THE ZONING .NAP OF THE CITY OF DEN*:.%, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPEND(:( TO THE 000E OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY UP DEN'TON, 'TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE N0. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES rO APPROXIMATELY 1.530 ACRES UP LAND SITUATED IN THE WILLIAM BRYAN SURVEYS ABSTRACT NO. 148, DENTON COUNrYs TEXAS AND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U. S. HIGHWAY 3a0 AND COMMENCING APPROXIMATELY 15140 FEET EAST OF MASCH BRANCH ROADI TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL •A' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL- •LI' CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTYt AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Cnew motion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance, on roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aya,' and mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. i i City of Denton C1.-,y Council Minutes Meeting of Februaty 5, 1985 Page 11 E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to light industrial (LI) on a tract of 4.960 acres situated south of U. S. Highway 380 and commencing approximately 420 feet east of Mascn Branch Road (Z-1714). The following ordinance was considered: NO. 85-26 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DeN'rON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPFNDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES 0? THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APF'.IES TO APPROXIMATELY 4.960 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE WILLIAM BRYAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 148, DENTON CC'INTY, 'TEXAS AND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDS OF U. S. HIGHWAY 380 AND COMMENCING APPROXIMATELY 420 FEET EAST OF MASCH BRANCH ROAD: TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 'LI' CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY$ AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'ayes' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,IL "and Mayor Stewart 'aye. Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance to reconsider a proposed 12 inch oversize water line and water pro rata agreement with Allan Estates Mobile Home Park on South Mayhill Roid near I-35E. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that approval to serve Allan Estates Mobile Home Park with water and sanitary sewer service outside the Denton city limits was approved by the Public Utilities Board, and by the Council on March 20, 1984. Since that time, this development has been annexed. Nelson said that the item is being re-submitted due to the sale of this development to new owners as listed in the title. The following ordinance was considered: N0. B5-27 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE 0ITY13 PAR'TICIPA'TION IN 'THE COST INSTALLING OVERSIZE WATERLINE FACILIrIESt AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT) APPROVING rhd EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THERE?ORB, AND PROVI- NG FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance, On roll call vote, McAdams aye,, Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye ' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Cne'd 'aye, and Mayor Stewart 'ayes Motion carried unanimously. S. Resolutiona A. The Council considered approval of a resolution supporting a grant application with the State of Texas for funds from the Land and Water Conservation Fund and/or the Texas Local Park Fund. (The Parks and Recreation Board recommends approval,) Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation said that this resolution would go into the grant application for funds from the State to develop a tract of park land which would be donated in the next three to four months. 1 - City of Denton city council minutes fleeting of February 51 1995 Page 12 rho following resolution was considereds R E S O L U T I O N TO N A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN DESIGNATING CERTAIN CITY OFFICIALS AS BEING REiPONSIBLE FOR, ACTING FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DENTON IN DEALING WITH In TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT FOR T9E PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN TAE LAdD AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT OF 19651 CERTIFYING THAT TdE CITY OF DENTON IS ELIJIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER SUCH PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the United States Congress has passed the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578), authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial assistance to states, and political subdivisions tl,-.reof, for outdoor recreation purposesi and WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has adopted Article 6C81r, V.A.C.S., for the purpose of allowing the State of Texas, and its political subdivisions, to participate in the federal program established under said Public Law Be-578, or such other programs as ace hereinafter established by the Federal Governments and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is fully eligible to receive assistance under this Program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton is desirous of authorizing its administrative staff to represent and act for the city in dealing with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department concerning this Programs NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I: That the City Council of the City of Denton hereby certifies that the City of Denton is eligible to receive assistance under Public 88-516; as augmented by Article 6081r, V.A.C.S. SECTION I1• That the City Council hereby authorizes and directs its City manager to represent and act for the city of Denton in dealing with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for the purpose of this Program. The City Manager is hereby officially designated as the Citv's representative in tnis regard. SECTION III: The City Council hereby designated its Director of Finance as the official authorized to serve as the city's fiscal officer to receive Fe.it-ral funds for purposes of this Program. SECTION IV: The City Council hereby specifically autnorizes the City officials herein designated to make application to the texas Parks and Wildlife Department concerning the tract of land k:.,:, as Northeast Park in the City of Denton. N ' J ~ J h ` ~ L ~ ,'.f P ~ t~ v a r) d A L F 1 y M rA~ k ~ n `t+, :f . C..e 5 ~ .I'R~~9; p O city of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February 5, 1985 Page 13 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED by the affirmative vote of the City Council of the City of Denton, on this 5th day of February, 1985. RICHARD 0. §T8'iARTo__~ff_YOK__ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: McAdams motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote. McAdams "ayes' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart "aye.' Motion carried unanimously. 0. The Council consio,,red approval of a resolution for approval of sever pipeline bring license f^r John Pass Investments sewer line from Mis;ouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval,) Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, said that the developer, John Pass Investments, is in the process of constructing this sewer line and requires the obtaining of a license for boring under the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad near Scott Street. Nelson said that this is a routine item. The following resolution was considered: R E S 0 L U T I 0 N BE IT RESOLVED DY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS: The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on oehalf of the City of Denton, Texas, a Pipe Line License Agreement dated January 1s 1985, between the City of Denton and the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, relating to the construction, reconstruction, uses maintenance, operation, repair and installation by boring method one pipe line encased in a carrier pipe not exceeding eighteen inches (18') in diameter, to be used for carrying a sanitary sewer line beneath Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company's right-of-way at Mile Post A-722.69, Denton County, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 5th day of February, 1985. I RICHARD 0. STEHART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS f ' Y City of Denton City council Minutes Meeting of Pebruary 5, 1985 Page 14 ATTdST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEN.-ON, TEXAS BY: McAdams motion, Chew second to approve the resolution. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye, and Mayor Stewart 'aye. notion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered approval of a resolution to accept an FAA Airport Grant offer. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.{ Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, said that the FAA has offered the City funds for the Master Plan Update. The Airport Advisory Board and staff recommend approval. Council member Stephens asked if this is a straight grant, or if the City must match it. Angelo answered that we have ten percent matching funds. Council Member Stephens asked about the time (came. Angelo said it would take approximately four months. He said that he would return to Council with a formal contract. Tne following resolution was considered: R F. S 0 L U T I 0 N WHEREA31 tae City of Denton has submitted to the Federal Aviation t.dministration an application for Fedecal Assistance dated NQvexber 12, 19841 for a grant of Federal Funds for a project for development of the Denton Municipal Airport; and WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has approved a project for development of the Airport consisting of a Master Plan Update and Environmental Impact Assessment Repoct; and WHEREAF, the Federal Aviation Administration has submitted to the City of Denton a Grant offer in the amount of $34,691.00, as authorized by the Airport and Airway Improvement Act Of 1982, for such airport planning and development: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ecESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. That the City of Denton hereby accepts the Grant Offer from the Federal Aviation Administration in the amount of 534,691.00 and agcees to comply with all of the assurances and conditions contained in the Grant Offer and Application therefore. V Z < h City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of February 51 1985 Page 15 SECTION 11, That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute such written agreements as are necessary to receive tte funds from the FAA. SECTIOA III. That this Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 5th day of February, 1985. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENrON, TEXAS ATZFSr: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: Stephens motion, McAdams second to approve the resolution. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and ;4ayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. 6. The Council considered removing a resolution anend:ng City of Denton policies and procedure. for holidays from the table. Council Member Hopkins said that he rer.lized that this was a sensitive Issue. He s..ated that he was absent when this issue was brought as an emergency item before the Council. He agreed that it was important, but not that it was an emergency. Hopkins said the time '.,N discuss this issue was at budget time, when the Council discusses salary and benefits for all employees, and not in the middle of the year. The citizens hold the Council fiscally responsible. Council Member Hopkins moved that this item continue to be tabled until budget discussion, Alford second the motion. Council Member McAdams said that this issue could be rationally discussed now. The dollar amount for the holiday will not make or break the city's budget. Wncan a generator went out, the money was found to repair it, and money can be found for this issue. We can and do rind money for those items we find important. McAdams moved that the item be removed from the table. She said that she supports Martin Luth?r King's Birthday as a sign of how far blacks and whites have come together. It is a sign that the blacks can have hope for the future. Blacks can strive for a better future as long as they feel they have hope. Black children go to schools named after City of Denton City Council Minutes ' Meeting of February S, 1985 ?age 16 people who fought to maintain slavery. You see white staff at city Council meetings, white fireman, white parar<edics, white bankers, white doctors, etc. Black unemployment, particularly for young olacks, is higher than that of whites. The City council cannot change these things; they are a fact of life. The fact that the Council cannot change these things has nothing to do with whether we are or are not a racist society. When the City of Denton was receiving CDBG grants to improve southeast Denton many changes were made. We have done significant things in southeast Jenton but the work was stopped when the federal coney was stopped. Council Membec McAdams asked the Council to look through the eyes of the black people of Denton. McAdams said that the regular City budget does not usually cover improvement to southeast Denton. Vocal leadership led to changes for blacks) Martin Luther King was one of those leaders. He was not a violent leader. He made whites see that they had been wrong and needed to change. John P. Keanedy is a hero to many blacks, particularly to older blacks. He was one of the first whites who said 'we have been wrong and we need to change.' America now has room for a holiday honoring a black man. President Reagan spoke with civil rights leaders and said they need to be doing something else. Council Member McAdams said that is a disappointment. Blacks still hear the word 'nigger', not as often as that used to, but it is still heard. Blacks still live in poor housing - there is still work to be done, McAdams said she wants a sign, and that the Martin Luther King holiday could be an opportunity for all of us. The blacks celebrate the Juneteenth holiday alone, but Martin Luther King belongs to all of us, the white and the black. Some of the tnings that go on in South Africa are no different from the things that go in Denton now. You cannot convince a black person that you are not a bigot unless you speak to them one on one. By setting aside Martin Luther King's birthday, the Council can speak to blacks in general, letting them know that they are not tigoted. This will keep blacks' hope alive that someday American society would be truly integrated. Two Denton churches recognize Martin Luther King's birthday. Martin Luther King had a dream. McAdams said that we say keep the faith, out we are still hopeless because equality has not been achieved. We are now at a plateau in civil rights. Blacks do not want to remember the things that have happened, the children that were blown up in the church. Take one small step. Not everything can be judged in dollars. Council Member McAdams said to stop and think about when this odyssey started; when Rosa Packs refused to move; when the four went to the lunch counters when in 1954, the Brown vs. Board of education case came to court and the decision was handed down. Tnis was thirty years ago. Someone could have been born and grown up in the time we were only tslking about civil rights and not doing anything. If we can say to young blacks, 'we support you; we give you this; join hands with us,' this will bq a sign of our commitment. This sign of what has been accomplished far outweighs any dollar figure we can talk about. I move that we lift this item from the table. Mayor Pro Tem Chew seconded the motion to remove from the table. Mayor Stewart said that the motion to leave the cesol.ution on the table must be voted on first because there was already a motion on the floor. The motion to leave the reso.ution amending City of Denton policies and procedures for holidays on the table passed 5-21 Council Members Chew and McAdams casting the 'nay' vote. City of Denton City council minutes Meeting of February 5, 1995 Page 17 Mayor Pro Tem Chew asked the Mayor if he would give the people in the audience permission to stand to signify that they want this item removed from the table. Mt.yor Pro Tem Chew said that tabling this item will not kil. the Issuer it still must be dealt with. He asked for a time limit. The Mayor said until the budget hearings. The Mayor gave permission for the people in the audience to stand up, which they did. Mayor Pro Tem Chew announced that he would run for City Council again so that he could see this issue through. Council Member Hopkins told Chew that this issue would be discussed by the Council in August. McAdams said that the City of Denton only has eight holidays. The City of Fort North has nine holidays plus two personal days. McAdams reminded the Council that this Council will probably not be discussing this issue, since there may be new members discussing the Issue. Council Member McAdams asked staff members to find out if we have 41 ordinance on the bnoks that would assist people who pay utilities in with their rent payments, but Lhe apartment did not par their utilities, as in the Sun states case in Dallas. McAdams asked what protection is there for residents in this matter. Council Member McAdams asked the Personnel Department for a report on the current status of the affirmative action hiring plan. She wants the information of the number of blacks interviewed and hired. Plus the types of positions blacks held in the City of Denton. The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real eatate, personnel, and board appointments. the Council reconvened into open session. The Council officially announced their decision to hire a City Attorney, Debra Drayovitch. With no futher business, the meeting was adjourned. RICHARD O. SPEWARf, MAYOR CHARLUTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY 0676s ~I City council minutes February 12, 1935 The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting st 7:00 a.m. in the Civil Defense Room. Council Members PRESENT: Mayor Alford, Hopkins, Maor McAdams, 4 and e Riddles,perger Al City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary ABSENT: Council Member Stephens 1. The Council received the recommendation of the Bond Committee regarding the proposed street bond election. Mr. Keith Appleton, Chairperson of the Street Bond Committee, reported that the committee had been working in four groups, one for each quadrant of the city. A study had be done of t east eet to each quadrant and a value for distress points the streets as well as a cost for repairs. These streets had then been ranked by each subcommittee according to use and importance. The i committee dha Council. The changes committee made a final list for recommendation to the Coun was recommending a total bond issue of $10,000,000 which would allow approximately 14 1/2 miles of streets to be built and 20 miles of streets to be repaved ani overlaid. This amount would not require an increase in taxes, had no political ramificaftiothe Street ns and all Sftour of districts of Denton were included. (A copy Ranking is attact:ed to and ma3e a part of these Minutes.) to meettthe his only street repairn eeds~hat $10,000,000 would not be madChew equate stated perhaps Riddlesperger stated fundst wothis uld be would accessibleodin tthe and Council that Member future. The intent was to arrive at a point where the repairs could ■tght have to be done agiin for'anbasis. other bond issue. voters as approach on Council Member Hopkins stated that the $10,000,000 would get things going and the Council could consider an increase the the street budget over the next few years. in the Maor normal Sexpansionaand be i start. budget in the future which might offset the need for a future bond issue. Mr. Appleton stated that everyone on the committee as well as the Council would have li1,d to have repaired or rebuilt all of the bond viewed and in streets, but conjunction withethe sit uhad to be Council 'member Alford stated that this had been a very good working committee on the street problem and hoped that it might be the beginning of more community involvement with city issues. Council Member McAdams stated that the Council should keep in mind boni without a woulda allows thee ciwas to doomore that fundirocedure. projects operating p with the street sooner and was a good way to operate. Council Member Hopkins stated that a long term concern was that the city was going to need a north/south and east/west rprridor. These but r should be kept This was not cross-city of thoroughfares thish partiscular should bond be issue considered the intent in mind. Mr. Appleton stated that the street commit ee did not look at extensions of streets, only repairs. unareceive nimouslyhe recommendation of the Bond Hopkins; Committee. Motion carried to Bo 7-7 PI' city Council minutes meeting of February 12, 198S Page Two , 2, The Council considered setting a date for a street bond election. Assistant City ;tanager Rick Svehla reported that staff had checked with First Southwest Company, the city's legal advisors, and the ~ity Attorney's office regarding advertising requirements prior to the bond election. An ordinance calling the bond election could be placed on the February 19 Council agenda, The earliest date on recommendation be held holdd thbe March e election6 as The Bond which Committee election could possible and there was a legal rrjoirement that the election must be held within 90 days from the date the ordinance was approved calling the election. Council Member Hopkins stated that he wanted to be sure that all those concerned with the bond election were absolutely ready to go. He further stated that staff should proceed with taking bids to expedite the actual repairs. givecithe eBond Committees ample time ltot advertiseofa darpromote othe election. Mr. Keith Appleton responded that 'larch 16 was the first day of Srin consensus Break the Bond 4Committeeh was that Marchw30uwouldsbe universities. best date. Council City Council election ton April March 6 and 3 felt there o was week before merit to a larger spacing. Council Member Hopkins asked for the thoughts of the other Council Members on having both elections on April 6. Council Member Stephens joined the meeting. believe the bond Council Member Alford eld with stated the that he did not Council election, election should be held with the Council election. City Manager Hartung stated that the bond election should not have political overtones. Council Member Stephens stated that the street bond issue was a political one and would it not be more objectionable to spend money for two elections rattier tnan just one. Council Member Hoskins stated that a recent seminar hosted by the National, League of Cities had stated that holding this type of joint election was not advisable. Mayor Pro lem Chew asked about holding the bond election in mid-April. and tight not be an appropriatee tine or deadliie stated incomeltaxmfiling Hopkins the bond election. Mr. Appleton stated that if held in mid- to late March, the Bond Committee would reach students e faculty dand uring encourage them to vote absentee if they were going to b g Break. Dr. Darrell Bulls, member of the Bond Committee, stated that the to s vote voters absetee, were interested to emphasis streets would and encouraging them those Hopkins motion, McAdams second to set the date for the street bond election for March 23. p 'r i'i. S, tiT: ~ 3 a• .~1 e .~'t~- r r;. , Y i~ s City Council Minutes Meeting of February 12, 1985 Page Three Council Member Stephens asked if the election had to be held on a Saturday. City Manager Hartung responded that city elections were typically held on Saturday. Motion to hold the election on March 23, 1985 ctrried unanimously. With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned. KILHARU U. , RAMR III 1673C STHET STUDY RANKINGS 11 Boundaries Distress Street Name From To Costs go t Hillcrest Scripture Emery 47,018 60 Avenue C Mulberry Oak 15,798 44 Bolivar Congress University 40,OS4 44 Kings Row Stuart Sherman 40,44S 44 Elm Prairie Highland 7,899 46 Magnolia New Asphalt Hinkle 14,445 47 Elm Congress Oak 26,588 50 Stuart Kings Row Coronado 34,667 52 Elm Mulberry Prairie 1S,798 SS Hercules Picadilly Sheraton 1?,334 ;S Carroll Northridge Ross 29,040 57 Oak Austin Bolivar 17,424 61 Hercules Redstone Stuart 26,400 62 Stuart Hercules Kings Row 23,112 66 Locust Hickory Oak S,628 42 Withers Oakland Mingo 17,334 43 Robinwood Emerson University 34,668 44 Paisley Woodford Hettie 8,085 4S Locust Oak McKinney 4,431 46 Paisley Frame Ruddell 13,8S7 46 First Bolivar Locust 8,667 46 Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywood 40,445 47 Kings Row Sherman Yorkshire 23,118 49 Mockingbird McKinney Oriole 100' 28,889 Sl Locust McKinney Congress 15,798 51 Emerson Freeto■ Wilsonwood 86,669 52 Austin McKinn-y Mulberry 8,666 53 Audra McKinney End of Divide 29,480 S4 Locust Mulberry Hickory 5,628 55 Mingo Withers Mockingbird 116,160 58 Old North Road University Mill Pond 27,720 S9 Frame RRK S. McKinney 17,424 61 Nottingham University Windsor 57,869 62 Greenwood Cherrywood Sherman 11,616 64 Locu t University Sherman Drive S,662 64 Elm University Congress SS,440 66 Paisley Hettie Ruddell 4,356 66 Pertain Mingo Wayne 4,356 66 McCormick Parvin Willowwood 17,334 49 Hoilyhill Ridgecrest Tennyson 63057 S1 Aveivie D Highland IH-35 14,44S S4 Hobson Lane Teasley FM-1830 SO,J94 S6 Bonnie Brae Riney Windsor 397,876 7S Bonnie Brae Windsor University 301,SS7 77 F-:nnie arse University Scripture 899,984 90 Scripturx IH-3S Bonnie Brae 341,907 99 West Oak III.35 Y 107,876 114 Hickory Avenue C Bonnie Brae 372,479 72 Oak Bolivar Jagoe 461,440 70 Hickory Avenue C Welch 200,547 72 Magnolia New Asphalt Bolivar 176,991 74 Bolivar Northridge University 471,615 76 Fry Scripture Oak 1i3,74( 78 Stuart Selene Hercules 123,595 78 Hickory Carroll Cedar 10"04s. 79 Welch Mulberry Hickory S3,694 79 Pershing Stuart Atlas 79,020 97 Avenue C 1H-35 Mulberry SS6,781 85 Locust Sherman Or- 473,218 79 Audra End of Divide Paisley 61,244 83 Glenwood Windsor University 387,739 85 Aver.ue A Highland McCormick 210,028 ?S Acme Bernard Fort Worth Dr. 61,302 94 Elm Highland Eagle 314,516 85 Locust Eagle Mulberry 47,916 S7 West Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe 321,295 71 Con Tess Qakland Ponder SS,176 69 Hickory Cedar Austin 11649SO 74 Teasley Lane Dallas Drive Ryan Road 160004000 Locust Congress University 682,09S 82 20.011'iles ttpavd ind overlay ;14 45 Miles Rebuild DATE 03/05/85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager . I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLATS AND REPLATS RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following plats and replats: 1. Preliminary Plat of Fletcher's State Fair Corny Dog Addition 2. Preliminary Plat of the Infinity Strata Addition 3. Preliminary Plat of the Mack Park Addition 4. Final Replat of Owsley Park Addition 5. Final Replat of Thompson Addition 6. Preliminary Plat of Sunburst, Phase 11. SUM; fARY BACKGROUND: PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. Respectfully submitted: • City Manager Prepared by: Harry ersau Urban Planner Ap ov Jeft Me Director of P anning and Community Development 0696,E t T t. r A . i,. f a. e t i 7 . rcCr d. I c+ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Fletcher's State Fair Corny Dog Addition SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.095 acres situated south of University Drive and north of and abutting Sunset Street and more fully described as Lot 1, Block 1, and shown in the R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31, City of Denton. The site is zoned general retail (GR) and a fast food type devel- opment is anticipated. Water, sanitary sewer. ele:tric, telephone, gas and solid waste services and facilities are adequate and available. The existing iz" diameter water line on Sunset Street will provide adequate water to serve this development. The preliminary plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat Harry cw-uL HN N. Persaud Urban Planner 0696j(12) DENTON CENTER, Tee. rONE0•91m"AL i1f TUL i Rlrt tN rl ll l cmm e. ten'n 1 pJ co Nn "torA I- . r. 41 1. Ictl. Lr M onto , C a I 0.015 Irlr t le * ruu. LIL9 w,rst RIVITI etl 1 $1 N, tre WVftV a Mar me mat L'A Rllrt ALI uL a L MI-15 I-Ar u twJw ' e.er rr }£F 1 Lety er.aIr"ii , , tour r, Are t. Roe a IV" tt •1ea 1f r¢ra,r r Rrw.yo u *Lm ree, rua m am o arun. .•I ettrr WIN OPLU rfta:as tl r:;+r.v 1.1 f.T Lrtrtt LY Nb LeM Ktl T1dCt fa O r. ur er ly rLttl tl IRM tR.l. Ile) LIb :;ti '+.rqr.::.! .I f*l enr:~ Yller'q -4r N Rte[T ITr[Ti r e TRAT►K AREritON . ? I.. o..F...,!' -r~ +t:iurs~.tI"'I :I~lit~urci at fIK. n~r • C tit A+' IL It ZT W OCAME , Tel ' J TONED-.GCNERAL RI TAIL rL r :v ctrl oc r,aTt/ ee etcuall wr..:e-uLa to Q I ~ I R -t/- . 04 s i Tf a r+voxo ( ~ IuoROxa lDT i + r ee'aV6 C 1LRLOtli e~npc Yf6 ..r • r:.. ri .,..tu r1814 : N rf. as rw f ' r r „ . . r, r•rIf} A LtrrOLl i.l rf ALL. rir ae L!C 09 Acne liSYOdA r~°~ :w.. -11 rr Twu Imm,. Roe 31 • .r. rf41r .C:err 'rU ru•, 'ar aa' ~ .,f Tt x/e/la✓' IC1 rnrG 7bTTCe.1 S _~feOt tlt 'r -.a; r'.1 rp 1 V r i..r.l q r A 1.♦G.rIN .4• a. rd v - - - SUffSErt-' S REfi - r ft-A i ~u a~r r: I,: •.tal• nu:. s e.6' n.e s _ T r . orb to . 1% t • .U 1: rt f`.r XI Ul;,Ue r r hJT'l• Aq,. J^•5t;f..rl.n tePar grVHO. w a -q OEOR1 9'JME6TBi, RN, RtlL MLLEt R'0$T, TM " •:r~r to n. r.: 2p[D~ 'wr,~. w nr. 0 fIAL nr .v r'n fip g0"A CR11 IkLrf TV • ^•yiTT M 0"TOM t:.-L, L'.:..•:. i LOT NR C0w1ERdk to RRr• w.. ,M;pA.L "rr Tw. a 9. r. :x LL roNrlh ,•.~.~r,~ ' TLf fg1, 146 TM L'A1RR7 0011 8-16~ V/C/AYTT AAW -~T'~^'".~. RODYYTA I, ROIr R A 'la;. I. c..+., rpart•w:llnuo rlrrl AN, "w r 1 ° M L1tMViLLf. it RA1 7600 rren rn rl -w• L It..aty tint ruT P" 4 Kam. LL' to,- V It. 11 1 1 LL}r , AN TUT b1 clef irM W, OWNER A11N(C KORN vnr r r...Uex turn.: / rnvtuL+ a vu rmL.e Ilk MINIMUM PRRiN P LOOK , 130 20' •.n v,.: . • ,r : t 1 '.r • r ei ,r. 'a RIt6[Ct AR PER TL000 INVAlAKI MAP a. a,ey PRELIMINARY PLAf• _ _ J1 r.:a NAMMEf7 HASfI, iVC MTI WAtr131011 1f e41 F CONlI.lnw ehwd m S fLErCHER S STATE FAIR CORNY DbCS [slow Ot IGN. anr.I , r a ~ 101 M! ADDiflOit 1.1 Tlif city OF 02.701 X M?m ftwr. TDIp R174i; JM 21711 y CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March 59 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the prelimimary plat of Infinity Strata Addition SUMMARY: This is a tract of 21.241 acres situated west of Carroll Boulevard and south of Oakhill Drive and more fully described as the Infinity Strata Addition and shown in the R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31, City of Denton. This site is zoned 9.15 acres 2-F, 4.6 acres MF-2, and 7.4 acres MF-1_ F; ~ctric, t.,lephone, and gas services and f"cilities are adequate and available. A 10" diameter sanitary sewer line is to be extended across the frontage of the property on Carroll 3oulevard to tie onto an existing 10 sanitary sewer line on Henry Street and Carroll Boulevard intersection. The. preliminary plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivi- sion and Land Development Regulations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Infinity Strata Addition subject to the following coalitions: adrainage 1. Centerp(939/369)and coordinate agree on with D course across the east end of Denton Center (9391369) before the final pls*_ stage; 2. Phase II, consisting of a total of 225 units, be routed to existing 12" sanitary sewer on North Carroll south of development. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat b t ry ~ Urban Planner 0696J(7) ewe v lot U II hM ~ V+ N N ' YN r l": r< w N a kilo i.aNRa r dCJ~ to T.Nata. .Oi r Ir II I.1 w, J 'An IN a rr a{t ~ -All r - - +i n 'e J o I TR + ' 1"YTIM 1' aYTIRrA~ I.i~~_ ~ !.R 1~ R f L • r •T 1 ~ , I L V~'t. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March S. 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of Mack Park Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 SUMMARY: This is a tract of 11.00 acres situated east of and abutting Audra Lane and north of McKinney Street and more fully de3cribed as Lot 1, Block 1, Mack Park Addition and shriwn on the Jonathan Brock Survey, Abstract, 55, City of Denton. The site is zoned general retail (aR) and multi- family apartments of 20 units per acre is anticipated. Water, sanitary sewer, electric, telephone, and solid waste services and facilities are adequate and available. Access to the site will need to comply with the applicable provisions of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: TG9 Development Review Committee and the Plt,nning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Mack Park Addition, Lat 1, Block 1. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat a.LN 1 K) l~tnr~ Oc.~ o~ _ Harry W. Pereaud Urban Planner 0696j(3) JJa~yy ~ I loll + W Lt+'/M. )ifu.6eq on I w ..,.s+. MA? } L.IY ' Y a o 1 ~ .r .a tMINt L. r~ ii.n .,a tlt [ !•Ytf'J)' 01C1Y r)n. rb J".Fr) F../hfr.f y 1 . ~ ~ 1 d1 e•..r[r M•.• )r,.,t INVryn.+:Jrr 1 I ` ~?tJ ~n..v •nn*t rxrtrl..a~*L+cr~ery I ! I I t•M~YrY L..1 1 K L.JJI.N' i I ~ 1 1 I na.. n' pltJfhf 7t' h i i ~•A.... 1 N[1N' ~ . 1 i I 44.N f1'[P/•~ I r ;I {[i ti I 1 ` \ oi' r 71 M I I 1 1 'Nbl 11.1rK„~ ~ I I I IMY 1.M rwY ~ N • I IP' i f e.el..r ~ ` -1 -u- - - - a.,-,7j= _ - _ _ MACK;PAM"I kbft I 11.00 mom in w i t.w xi., 1-n ! NIt""A I..rd nOL:$ Ii t!ll NJUm, tfNt;" ~rra.eww'rMringRw Rmjlr+.e,fR 196111 COMM""!, t to-ou rlwrrlrlrrrrrlrlnlrrrlrlrlrlblr.Irlrl Mln lrul rwkrirlr I lrlrlr lr~r~rlrl , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACKUP SUMMARY SKEET MEETING DATE: March 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat t;f the Owsley Park Addition, Lot 12-A, Block 11 SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.36 acres siruated north of and abutting Prairie Street and east of Bonnie Brae and more fully described as Lot 12-A, 31ock 11, Owsley Park Addition, City of Denton. The tract is zoned residential multi-family (MF-1) and multi-family development is anticipated. The purpose of the replst is to remove the existing lot line to create one building site. Water, sanitary sewer, electric, telepbone, gas and eolid waste services and facilities are adequate and available. The final replst conforms 1:o the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivison and Land Development Regu- lations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the final replst RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the final replst of Owsley Park Addition, Lot 12-A, Block 11. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of the final replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced final replat Harry N. Fersaud Urban Planner 0696j(11) 1 as so 4,a Ila immom- x111 H. IN at Law 11 u. r.•r .I Ohl this to la. a.a.1 {AAl1410 {CAt~ of In4 a1r1.d to 114 1. r«161.44 1N11F 1111 ua1 .thou ele II it. Cllr As 1461 N.14NN f6wf•rb of 414 boy dl to rasr .f the$ Ci 144 111. ItMI II .1 %"for tort allots. MCC 1TIrIa al1IT IT Il 1/ 16 M1{ I ,t66 1H1 1+ latrail N Prow etd 1.1 N IN 114, ll.t..r I7/~I lei .aylrl . I tee, 1S N 114 110 Nna1a •1 N+w L I I ! t/ 1 7 1 1 S L a 1 ! ••°,'.f.ull the 6.41•0 01011 NiN ..tr 0-11 11.11. 10 Ven INJ ai Idlvrl (-ti d l1Rlgsl6 ..1 IN "9tNol Cattle of IM Ims NI.$ a.etlllrl +L~Iti NL14 At as It" s1 at 1. U. IM It IIN H "m..10-11 ~r ' OAO T 100.0' : rt. the aw u.rN le...t .1 M. ale N/ a ON Ialy 141 9601 /0' C ab' toil or IM 9641 It" of "9M. Mao s1le.ta 1219"r %.1t% till is 441 11.E of IM Asia 141 17 6 howl of C 14.1 I.N u • follow LN 1"" N LM "9l.et01 Retail INnrll t Te1od to .11 N 1 NtowN N11t PAided at I./ tM 4i1 1.Oh t $#oteer IN.6 4o.14 fee .As N IN Iw[NAsl C11N4 H IN ap faiii115i14aNrAI / 1 1'/IOIS It AL raid l.# 111 (g Tlegrf %..to .146 114 late 1144 l1 IM I'Id Mt It l di folt1 N L..l 1.•1 16 al Uw 114 0.1 at IN "9114811 9WOF NM.H .41 t•Iw 4, IN M.lt Ill. .11 holr/1 siru11 _ t / f 10•Af L 0 1 12 L 7 I 1. t 1 1 f1 t.Lter eta IM tuff 1114 .f hotel. street . 41.16«0 of to • If• IM.+ 1... is IN tuck .r 11410114 614 •NIet16a Call .e a. LO,. A 0110 be 0.M A4/1 r gal. 1.Oh11Asp 146.6 ALL 4s9 17 ML14 HHt6tl4 r 6 we Me PLJI 4.611..11.0 the I01e- lot? AI hire fees total. 1 904410,• In44ol14 /r •irote 1. YR la•1 R.H II "Skri Fold 10 Nil rl rl i. Ur filet I ..et 0,...106 ar.l r.bu. s1 4-6 0.141, ! Lot 1 • A of / %Ikl i.i:.imii .1L::i is~.:: r•1. IL..v.a r1Pu..l.rn w/ OWlLtV FA K ADDITION = ~!!1 0 / m-RLtp----• JA P U C A L S K llee, tP. to..14et1144N Niue Pottle N old Nd I'll t...11 A. 114 el.l.. Il Ohio IQ C.toa611t .0,.6#44 HI 141.94, 1.... I. M 1. N 1 • Pori" 4t,%a Met U 4.144111) td Ito 104,401. IJM It11 6t 11.1.114 00 16. gee H101.4, Zt1eeOnu.N 614 10 tl. alu.10 allied. 41114 r x, M /411 fq seat N omell hli---*" [ooir P.Yllt to itt Iles 61 .441 It brl.Asfr Ig11.6 If I noN1 s141 A! 114• 04 Id' iter 10• U1,141" 6,04 welt 1#446{• 't4 PRAIRIE STREET • ,NI n• .r •::.fUlt I I.'t u• •110411 fnlllt.. FINAL FLAT to,? 1110-,t4+.. t.u.Af. bbw6104 ?.all, 901.4tor. IC Mrrh# lrtlltl Lot I/ L• A 8144#6 I I of r 1. 1• , 111. ".le" it 11•..6 xrol age.10N• @draft.1 tw 1.41 1•.,...0116.,1.•N..•111gt.1.VIrM6oo#fale44ef10.•1 OWSLEY PARK ADDITION for n h4" 41•. eel 1000-11•,1 xr.11a.#r .I,1 Ib Ir►IlelalN 411 U.1 r CITY OF DENTON crm- ►t. DENTON COUNTY,- TEXAS .a 041009811t It .1.r r. (Ot111AN 6 Ae1{t1A11 , - 9 e1N10N It re/. Mot No b CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: Match 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of Thompson Addition, Phase 1, Lot 1 SUMMARY: This is a tract of 1.79 acres situated west of and abul:ting old North Road, north of U.S. Hwy 380 and more fully described as Phase 1, Lot 1, Thompson Addition and shown on the W. Pogua Survey, Abstract A-102. City of Denton. This site is zoned residential multi-family and residential multi-family development is anticipated. The purpose of the replat is to abandon an existing easement which is not required to service this development. The final replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the final replat RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Commicten and the Planning and Zoning commission recommend approval of the final replat of Thompson Addition, Phase 1, Lot 1. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of final replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced final replat Harry W. Persaud Urban Planner 6696;(4) F+• l r C1 I 1 1 still of false fort. r:U • 1 ' [only of HvIll 1 :f 1 1 nuslr test 1. tn. Is th. 6"., or •Il sill enbh 1 •r uiil• .0 ir•I PC 'rl ~•i• Pit It CCiIC .r is 140 fy1 1•r.#8 at.NUt f.wn 1177 1o b.u PC IIIr 1n W tl4 •1 rarse u,•/nl.. to, t - •.rr ,o 1,1 .1 •Il or hu,•M I40411n h1a N1 4r sq r.g l•l nat. 711, uu•.r • ~f.ur41t It faL•1t 1 af11 it we 111 risk 11..11• at Ntlw NwL.lu sea .'7WI r trw7 Raise .rtt 411 ,u t,H N:, 1ui11N1 41 f.l l.r41 f 1 IMlt/l/f 119 its IMt♦401t tr•su .f %6 bug Nly /un1411 Y411,: N { gets .r1..• ll 1.1 11 1\1 1q1 1,f 111 aa 401 ,Iry I1, 1.H1s.rt b r 1 1 1 boll I f n Yt .t f 1,r#8NS Nf411.1 I1.NM fw 40aHl, 1$ Ill /1140 1Nri•1 nl nt!1 1 .111.61 t •11N t 111 N the 0.11 r at .111.61 1 fa[Itf 141 s► 1 1 era ( /140%41 U 8•40.t1 Y..t tit I. Nut 1h ,'1.. tit $,11 • IMtlsi •w t9Nnl11llw 3w l1.s77n 1 11•t•sto of 141.01 1..1 1. o its, a., NN it ON 1itj i . 5 •Ir l t 1'1 _.t. th +i +•f.11R/!G N tw. 1/ fl.•1.. I1. tua 41 Ink lrrlll.l•r r11th• n11 also i - • Il464 1 1 1r N Ira b u n1 rrl n IN L U set 1,n•, or si. Irlf INSi^ Ar sN Vr tal,al t•n41 . 11 f to 1 1:01.. llw tw, ' VICINITY who -r s I .0:.. u have [let.. bn1 77 Nlrrra t' ol•atr. 40 /rmb Sal' •d1 1140 to 1741 •t /i41. f 1 . 'i , / • INa•to .f I4-r1 411 d... 1... W resod .1 41 a.11. I.In sen.I.7 - tt C,t)) thbtl Nnn 11 Iserin .1 at t41u41 Ink a tlai Ioil at 41 It nt 1- laid tIu r it v13 ra N kale t7 fag b a 1a41. of bras at IN N,u sebn.r alra I1. 11 I. 101 ~.~i• eN I411NLt Nato n 1•q IM Sul . lrnn Cloth as 0.41•44 it 11i.tu t0 Isr•n1• Nrl 1.O I, 6r11 . ul1'• . i L at U/It/ I llulrf to. ua N1 . Its sense •1 711.[1 Iru 40 u tn1 111 set a sir Nr u•1st t.farr Ibun 1 WI 1177 ~ ; i 11 IN Nat l1.• .t 711 fuse 1.141 1 th[1tl Ia,♦ ti ignu Il flrata. 11 brut Yak rise U. O.1 alas 1411 40111 Iu1 ` 1 ft' V' pf• 1 all ff' tjr: • fl•N.a 1/1.N 1411 p N. rL•tt t1 IItb 01st of aelrrlse 1.17[ uul N 1,N. NI ,all YM' it atniy, la Ito, lrlnrllg. goal ALL rIN IT thug natlllre, 4 l 1 1 tY7! hl[111 (1 ' L tD. I. k •t Nr•lf •f•r. .11r 1 /nor, real + 1.11.. i,.11 t.1 n. Y•r.l. gnat si.f: f,a.ar' 1 u ~ T It 1i1~ _ 11t rlSUa Oak, Lot al 1. W tIN rf .1•.. 1,#840 t VI' 1.d. (•.•I /r ir•.. t.f N IH.77 INILeN IN I r111• .u /qu•r 11. .01.11 L ~ / ~ ~ , ail-•~ 111 IN11r ..auub N•s. Nrn., rl/for. rt...d yI'I _.Y--- r E;~ f : I lon or Ito., F Q!_, [trays if rare[ O it Q o 1. 797i AC. t r3'i, ° ■ ~ REPLAY /[flit at. t11 .N rrrla'1 Orb., 7.1111 It 111 at ..1/ (111.0.11/ 91.410 111 heat Is I/i1. ~t•I I p gl ler.n to 91 91.410 t11s 4 is* $ tote r 1,.• w.f y Is 40,4111.1 to u 4 THOMPSON ADDITION FF he r1..1.ty I.......... Ire .n...(aku 1. 1r 1..l l •.41.1.9 w a dt i. Itlt. PHASE ONE LOT ONE r" 111 fatr41. 1w a.1...nu.. sir.11... rulat, .f t. IN e. aUtl t7.r.1. ,r . tl•t / i f• .ItR1 ,nit Ir 7401 11/11.111 lull[ big if v I :int.,... ii Hbq futN L IN, foul at ruse tagr,~s• q 1' 4 i`I + 9',f,.~ i f '•1 L =.(r. of (rat LUlu h/ltu~ p it • ~ I + ' `'`ei `M,1,,',+y : { r ~1~:' fnnrarl ent[netn 2 /'■i ' • ~r,r .l- tlM ALL nm n TNnt mAlo , t ♦ ,1•. vim , fy.1 .t t 7N1 Ir rl llin I. Nt1RB. 1#81,14011 h11a O \ N I (1 I r tC r r.1. ! 7M.y.rr a hoof Irrtlf7 that u, pill rN . . O •J1. I • furn.l tea is 411.61 lff Nrlratl .n a1 At Cr 411 Iu1. 1N 1911 too NI.•0117 1..w 41[411 /w5N - a~ I Y.eY 1,.N or 71 N 411 at of f,41tba 401 b,40r111N 1t 9Nrlf lltl YII% Ike If1lr.afat x tirry \ H t, 404 11 /401.,,Tnu' RIt PLATC x H L 0 T ji THOMPSON 'ADDITION . \ rMy w • r • IF • 1 sit PHASE ONE, I Is ONE CITY OFGENTOk s I~ DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS f f ° 1i11 1991 Ira rr I/LIt IRA M1' III At149.41: I4IIYIt14 1 I As 1""' 11- f r, i n 7 I ck . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DAPS: March 5, 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of Sunburst Phase II SUMMARY: Thii is a tract of 11.0535 acres situated south of Dallas Drive and west of Teasley Lan!. This site is zoned commercial (C) and apartmeit devel- opment is anticipated Vater, telephone, gas, electrical and commercial solid waste services and facilities are adequate and available. Sanitary sewer capacity, however, is limited at this location and the development %,)ll not be allowed to tie on to the sanitary sewer system until John Pass sewer line is com- pleted. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOHMENUATION: The Developmrit R%~view Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Sunburst Phase 11' sub ect to the condition that the development will not tie on to the sanitary sewer system until after the John Pass line '.s completed. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat u - N. Harry 91. ersau Urban Planner 1 'i t ilil } i V I 1 ~ d0 _ 3r rrrr > WWo -y - Lt~ rrrrrririt n "Q: 1 r W 'd iv ~Il~ '711 1 ~ 1 ~ y,: •IY _ ~ ~~~y1~ RI ~I I { JA W-.Y11 Yflro . L • r ~ I I • ~ t1~~ 1 1 1 11 r i " _~~I r r Ti; fl~ •/r '{~y O • W W ® ~ . riw~• © i' lir• 3 r ~ ~Ifr. i r.rr u , 1A r 7m♦ Trr ww ir _ • Mw w L I l 1 'ty~ 1 4 vi 4 ow. 1 H•M \ ,MYM• .wMw. NIN. I •Y • I ' YK " k= ~?iti G • r b y x r z,r k s.. G ^d.'. h r ? DATEt 03/05/85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOR AT TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HKARTNG FOR ZONING CASE Z-1701 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission considered this item at its meeting of February 13, 19850 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1701 by a vote of 6-1. SUMMARY. This is a request for a change in toning from the multi-family (MF-1) classification to the planned development (PD) district at 614 W. Hickory St. If approved, the planned development will allow the owner to use the structure as an office while requiring him to maintain the present facade of the building. BACKGROUN : The site is located between the special purpose downtown center and a low intensity area to the west. The site plan for the development insures that the residential character of the area will to preserved. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL TMPACT: Not applicable. Respec~ul ubm t }/¢J 464 G. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: Den pa e te! a S Urban Planner App ve : all Jeff Meyq Director of planning and Community Developtaeat 1051g u A7 T y n t _ I ,i .k~lr F R ly ) .'I k;l~ <F A tT~ +i PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To: Denton city council Case No.% Z-1701 Meeting Date: March 5, 1985 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Brian Kruger 614 N. Hickory Denton, TX 76201 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action: Change in zoning from multi-family (MF-1) classification to planned development (PD) district for office use Purpose: Renovation of existing structure for office purpose Location and Size: 10,000 square foot tract located at 614 West Hickory Street. The site is more particularly described as Lot 3 of the McKennon Addition. Existing Land Use: Single family residential Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential; MF-1, SF-7 with historic overlay South - Single family, multi-family; MF-1 Past - Single family, multi-family, Carroll Commerce Center; MF-1, SF-70 NS West - Law office, Davis Purity Bakery, single family, multi- family; SF-7, MF-l, PD-58 Denton Development Guide: The site is located between the western edge of the original downtown special purpose major activity center and a low intensity area. i SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: Drainage systems are adequate for this site. I i„ w ai 4 a i COY `(Case MZ-1701) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) Utilities: An 8 inch water line and an 6 inch sewer line are located in West Hickory Street. These linen are adequate to serve the proposed use. Electric, gas, and telephone service are available to this site. Transportation: The tract has frontage on Hickory Street, a secondary major arterial. The Engineering Department has mentioned the need for sidewalks in this area and some additional right-of-way. ANALYSIS The petitionbr is requesting planned development (PD) for office use on this site. The owners stated intent is to remodel the house into an office facility while preserving the character of the neighborhood by leaving the facade as is. In July of 1983, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council approved o request for planned development (PD) for office use adjacent and west of this tract at 620 West Hickory. At that time, many neighbors and the Historic Landmark Commis- sion felt that a precedent for further encroachment of higher intensity uses in this neighborhood was being set. Staff recommended approval of the request because it felt that a controlled office use was preferable to unrestricted multi- family land use at that location. Through PD restrictions, staff was able to control specific site design and architectural plans. The PD concept p'►an for the proposed office shows the preeent structure, parking, driveway entrance and exit, and landscaping. Four (4) standard size parking spaces have been provided. Based on the parking standard of one (1) apace for each three hundred (300) square feet of floor area for general offices, five spaces are required for this site. The Planning and Zoning Commission granted a variance of one parking space in order to preserve the front yard which is vital to maintaining the residential character of the neighborhood. Ingress and egress to the property will be provided through the existing drive approach on W, Hickory Street. Exiting care mil back into the designated turn around area and exit on Hickory Street. , n f i • 4~fy p. r,r y w.r ` r x t ^"4 4. i .i , YA -4 tf m e 1 » sn. Lfo" ~t (Case #Z-1701) Page Three AtlALYSIS (Continued) The proposed office use does not violate land use policies of the Denton Development Guide due to its location between the original downtown special purpose center and a low intensity area. tf the present facade of the building is not altered, an office development at this site could be an attractive alternative to standard multi-family development (MF-1 zoning is in place). RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1701 by 9 vote of 6-1 with the following conditions: 1. The facade of the present structure shall not be altered from it's present fora. 2. The turnaround area must be clearly marked with no parking signs. 3. A aix (6) foot solid wood fence be erected along the northern property line and shall be thirty-four (34) feet in length. 4. No detached signs shall be permitted. 5. A variance of one (1) parking space shall be granted; therefore, a total of four (4) parking spaces is required. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition with condition 2. Deny petition 3. Approve petition with additional conditions 4. Approve petition without conditions ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. PD Concept Plan 3. Reply Forms Total 4. Property Owner List 5. Planning and Zoning commission minutes of the Meeting of February 13, 1985 Ori076 WEST OAK 5 10 113 56.5 565H3 T6 56.6 566 95 " 2!4.23' SAUND'ERS` ADDIT ION 6 - I S ~ I 2 4 2 S 4 5 t isee lot*fttA Sup dl L61 IiA ~ ~ Q z 2o' 10~ ~1 Bowl a ' Z % X23° LOT 1-8 7g 12 11 9 8 7 6 8 6 5 l us' ' Tr' 92' 63' 50' 75' 38' 7S'/ f S" Z-1701 75 7b T6.3 ~S' 7S 77 8 0~0 721 110' 104' 83 72.2 63 ~tft 8 9. ~N 10 12 13 14 15 3 4 - 5 6 7.1 71.81 9956 =MINNOW -~--1 T2 .2 45' 182.47 + ~ ~rrrrr~rr++~ wr 01- 104 B L, OCK L •N s 18 18 i8,1 a CY 16 AM 4=OT I M SERRY CREEK 'ADDeiod. ~7. y 16,4 102' 331,3'x' , IT MULDERA'Y' i ww~! i . r. l y L Aml>-5CdYF $ .5r~6GL 1 qr r i9' 1 •',x . _ C ~ Sia..4 G'E 5 W Z y.3 y . y 3 " +~d t l~L►-~ G~ tN y ta -ruRO~H~ rJo~~K.x~~ I • I 3 Yi d A 1 r4 rr } t16 Ir+ I "N1 C d~ a u# LL FNS c~Aa }}xLr~,aj~ iLK., 'tiIIE~I !J2n^+G,r-4c. ILL. 4 J, •..~xkAoM.►c sai ~)C~rt S►~1G OaK•T1'.ae ~aA4s : . s~ss " /eaJ►s PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COONCIL 2-1701 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Sally H. Mudd 1810 Mistywood Denton, TX 382-2128 I I ra ,1 r~ ~5,°~ + r~~',u~ 1k~~ 4 y}P ~ f..~ ,u' ~n ~ w1'~ ~•3.d, r 1 ( i• ~'ri r,. ~1 d' "b i ~1. ~JN 7, M 5 ~k r ~ r '4'~ ~s b'~ , ~ .1.,~ 3z8" p 2 f~ 15 ~Af 6L . D ~ C L , SC c c~• 01 Map l , d T,o.0-oIbo ~35C~GE n, ~ ~ ~ At ~,ti p !1 . A ~ r ~r V ~v. . . r+ • jr 329 AA loo j&dbfil I la V/. A Id P & Z Minutes February 13, 1985 Page 2 111. Public Hearings A. Z-1701. This is the petition of Brian Kroger requesting a cia`nge in coning from the multi-family (MF-1) classi- fication to the planned develep,rant (PD) classification for office use at 614 Nest Hickory S+rest. The property is more particularly descritad as lot 3 of the Mc Kennon Addition. Ms. Spivey stated there were lb reply forms mailed to property owners; three were returned in favor, one in opposition and one phone call in opposition. Mr. Ellison asked Ms. Spivey to explain why this request is being presented to the Planning and 'Coning Commission again. Ms. Spivey explained the request was brought before the Commission previously and was tabled due to differences of opinions concerning a planned development. She stated she had advised the petitioner he could not re- quest a planned development since the pproperty is less than three acres, the amount required by the Zoning Ordinance to request a PD. The City Attorney advised this request qualifies as an office center and can be a PD. Mr. Kruger came back with a PD and the request was dunied because of the parking and egress problems. She continued he has reconfigured the parking situation, therefore, the reason for this request. Brian Kruger, petitioner, stated he has modified more to allow more s ace for parking. He stated he plans to re- store the building to the original character. He added ne is requesting a planned development. He explained the egress as entering and exiting on Hickory Street. He said the parking requirements of the city is a min- imum of five spaces, but is requesting a variance on parking to alleviate parking in front, thus leaving a residential look to the neighborhood. He showed a transparency of the surrounding property and stated multi-family development exists all around his prop- erty. He adde6 several of the properties surrounding his are in very poor condition, which is a big concern to him. On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Kruger stated there is a total of 1,180 square feet. Hr. Hike Smith stated he lives on lot 5 at 705 Vest Oak and asked if approved what benefit this would be to the city and does it benefit the neighborhood, which is 95 percent residential. He stated he bought his house eight years ago and had spent a great deal of money to restore it. He added his house was the first in the City of Denton to be toned Historic. He stated he fears if this is approved and no wants to sell his property, the buyyers will look at the offices in this area and feels it would be a hit_derance to selling his property. He pointed out the lots in the arue that are presently being renovated and ststod his biggest opposition is to the reoccuring question asked by the Commission, "Would you like it to be gonad office iasteadl" He continued the property is in good condition and in his opinion, there's just no rationale to rezone this property as Mr. Kruger is proposing. ~~,F .2 x .~i° il '~'p,s-r 3 4 rS 1 ♦ y;i.+ r e AA .w q w; < "R ifrr a Y a1 - u a 4 P fA Z Minutes February 13, 1935 Page 3 • Ms. Spivey stated Mr. Kruger's intent is to remodel the house and leave the facade as is. She continued staff would ask Commission to grant a variance for parking and allow the front yard to remain as a green area to fur- ther preserve the residential nature. She stated there are several houses in the area that are zoned Historic and the area is currently being considered as a Historic District. She continued with staff report that the PD concept plan for the proposed office shows the present structure, parking, driveway entrance and exit, and landscaping. She stated ingress and egress to the property will be provided through the existing drive approach on Neat Hickory Street. She further added the proposed office use does not violate land use policies of the Denton Development Guide due to its location on the fringe of the original downtown special purpose center. Staff recommends approval with conditions. Mr. LaForte asked if the city could enforce the no park- ing regulation at this site. Ms. Spivey replied no, it is private property. Mr. Sidor questioned current policies, to provide five parking spaces; he commented if this is 16200 plus square feet, four spaces would be adequate. No. Spivey explained one parking space is needed for every 300 square feet of floor area, or a minimum of five spaces, according to the Zoning Ordinance. On question from Mr. Pearson, Ms. Spivey gave the parking requirements for multi-family development. Mr. Kruger in rebuttal stated, the word commercial keeps coming up and this is a request for a planned develop- ment. He added as far as the condition of the house, he had hired an inspector and the front of the porch would have to be completely redone; the heating and coolingg as well as insulation is in very poor condition and would also have to be redone. He indicated on the map (question from Mr. Juren), khere the six foot wood fence would go. Chair declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Pearson commented, in making comparisons, it would not be unreasonable ►or four one bedroom apartments to go in at this site. Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1701 with the following conditios: 1) That the facade of the present structure shall not be altered from it's present form; 2) That the turnaround area must he clearly marked with no parking signs; 3) That a six foot W) solid wood fence be errected along the northern property line and shall be 34 feat in length; and that a variance be granted for the optional Sth parking place. Seccndad by Mr. Pears-in. Mr. Claiborne made a motion to amend the original motion to add the condition that no detached signs shall be permitted. Seconded by Mr. LaPorte and accepted by Mr. Juren. Notion passed unanimously (7.0). r nr^ n`~ r•.Y;tr w C { 4. Jl' ~i~~.. n,:'iv .A°, t t' 's F=i:~f '~0~ m''r.z.t ? "1 V sc r ~j~ 5 f .y' r:5 r P 6 2 Minutes February 13, 1985 Page 4 • Mr. Sidor made it notion to amend the original motion to add a condition that parking space C, (ea indicated on the proposed site plan) th9 one closest to the building, be designated for handicapped. hr. Juren accepted the amendment and commented, we have become so trained not to park ir, those spaces designated for handicapped; so in effect, we are eliminating one space in four. Mr. Claiborne commented since it is oa private property, the o'.mor would have to enforce it. Mr. Sidor withdrew his motion. Vote was called: Aye - b; Kay - 1 (Ir. LaForte voted ~no. ) B. Z-1710. This is the petition of Burke Engineering Inc. requeating a change in zoning from the agricultura{ (A) classification to the li ht industrial (LI) district wn a 13.4 acre tract of land located at tha southwest corner of Riney Road and U. S. Highway 77 (Old Sanger Hiakway). Ms. Spvisy stated there were 24 repply forms :;ailed to property owners; one was returned in favor and one in opposition. Pablo Rubio, of Burke Engineering, stated he is representing the petitioner, who has indicated they are going to allocate 20 to 23 percent of the land for general retail use and the remainder for office develop- ment. He stated they were approached by staff to rent an easement and our client has ro objections to th s. ! On question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Rubio stated the reason for light industrial zonin}{ is because definace plans for the entire trrrt are not available and this type zoning will allow the most versatility. Mr. Sidor asked if this property is across Highway 77 from Texas Instruments' property. Mr. Rubio said it is. Ms. Anna Pena stated when she came to Denton, she chose the Northridge area of town rather than Southridge, Montecito Del Sur, or Ranch Estates. She stated she owns 14 acres between Northridge and Highway 770 located one-half mile from the propposed, which would depreciate the value of her property if approved. She stated in the very near future, she will come before the Co= is- sion with preliminary plans for her new home. She stated she plans a very dignified entrance from her prop- erty onto Highway 77. She commented that the petitioners do not even know what they are going to do. She stated if one doesn't know what they are going to do with every inch of their land, they should not have favor with just a portion. If allowed, she stated this whole area is going to be light industrial, with Texas Instruments right across the street. Nt. Spivey continued the site is located on the edge of a low intensity area adjacent to the 1-15 and U.S. Highway 77 high intensity area. She stated the eastern boundary of the high intensity area follows none of the logical pianning boundaries and in fact a Wts Texas instruman►.s property in half. Staff feels that these intensity areas should be revised to move the eastern boundary of the high intensity area to the eastern w ♦i a tp: ,~,P 'A r a P~.._w t .,4 v r Y y N 4 77 DATE: 03/05185 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: ZONING CASE Z-1726 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1726 at its meeting of February 13, 1985 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval. SUMKARY: This to a tract of 6.714 acres situated south of the Payne Drive and Westgate Intersection. BACKGROUND: This tract is currently toned SF-7 and SF-10 development can be undertaken but the developers would like to change the designation on the toning map. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. Respectfull ubmitte;• •-7r- G. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: Harry N. ersaud Urban Planner Ap oY May YOU Director of Planning and Community Development 06498 1 Y f [7; i; i"°'~ "Fn e 4' 1 M t. w v .i~ t r w ~ + ~ t' a u i` a Z ; aq win PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1726 Meeting Date: March 5. 1985 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Charles Watkins, representing Denton-Tedi, Inc. Status of Applicant: Owner - developer Requested Action: Change in the current zoning classification from single family SF-7 to SF-10 Location: Approximately 6.714 acres situated in the F. Batson Survey, Abstract #43, Denton County and being that parcel of land located south of the Payne Drive and Westgate intersection Existing Land Use: Single family (SF-7) vacant Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family, agriculture; SF-70 A, vacant South - Agriculture; A. vacant East - Single family; SF-7, vacant West - Single family; SF-10, vacant Denton Development Guide: Site is located in a low intensity area. SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: Phasing of the development needs to b done showing improvements for each phase. 'transportation: Transportation requirements have (eon addressed during the platting stage. Public Utilities: A study of the sewer system is to be done to determine capacity for additional loading. Developer will need to run a 12° water line across the frontage of hie property on Payne Drive. Y V d i x3 t n f f < ~~k c ;r r'. fri i (Cate Z-1726) Page 2 ANALYSIS This site is currently zoned single family (SF-7) and it is located in a low intensity area. Technically. SF-10 development is permitted under SF-7 zoning designation since the former is more restrictive than the latter. In this case the developer is expanding the SF-10 area to include 6.7 acres of the currently zoned SF-7 tract. While the development is permitted by the regulations we understand that the developer would like to have the designation changed on the zoning map and so his application for a zoning change must go through the normal procedures. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning commission considered Z-1726 at its meeting of February 13, 1985 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Reply form totals 3. Property owner list 4. Planning and Zoning commission minutes of February 13, 1985 06496 ~ ~ r~. r • l;g s ,4 r.,: .c ~ ~ f: _ a~ ~ s x r u ~ n m.~ r t S 3 i•~• ° ~ vy ^~V °4~ ~Y~ y{ ~M 1 a~S r rydl f '4 ~r ~ 1 1 L l . I~ I (Ir R I. A »J ~-5.139 SF-10 ' r~ SF-7 i L•1728 ' + { PD- 86 w, J Q milk ♦ • limit ~ ` 1•.'. 1 iN • • . , r 1 , i 11 ` i i i~t; 1 I P4 •e ~ e. ~e• rr a iT u._ I- y • • 1 1 • I I e•ec. a . If C ~ •a t r 1 I • • • v r ell 0 : R w1n N rl ,w.", n .N w N w' N « u '71 i i.\a~`.-~r~, I , r rf .'J it I .V .u 1.1.•MM M nM IA 64 K • umr•ret a M•1tW ..r I.ir tN•• NsY NIM. w~ i11M e•• w iu• NI•~' ri, 1M,IM e1rM W .tN WnF•N• LM••Vi• bu mt. Meta wHtO~fT Mt~6Ntf - °~ti•uw • r1e1 /Vast 1, 1 In ul 'e •dtr 11w,~s el•so. 9a,1• .a ~4(1t0~it 1{iONt•J cr. 1 r0 •rl Qt KNUO ,[1N Clit d OtNfdh. grNTO.1 CO,/•tt, Tr Sim .^5'r1 xr Fa d' S " " r s Ff" 6 ,"'R9 a' c•~'e., a re.. .s 6. i~. . r ;~'f rs:' ~ F~ N~ e R ri• Z s T. .,S^ ! t.: PROPER'T'Y OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1726 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received 17~~ '~Zv - occ~a+ ~c y P CZ Minutes February 13, 1985 Page 5 property line of the Texas Instruments tract. This boundary will align with the proposed collector street and zoning boundaries. She continued considering surrounding land uses and zoning, it is unlikely that single family or low intensity development will occur at this location. She stated the site has frontage on U.S. Highway 77, a primary major arterial, and Riney Road, a collector street, which s considered desirable for light industrial land use. She stated only upon the reconstruction of boundary lines in intensity areas 2 and 3 would staff recommend approval. Mr. Sidor asked if the petitioner discussed requesting a planned development. Ms. Spivey stated the owner has no definate plans with what he intends to do. Mr. Ellison stated he had talked to Willie Hudspeth, an area property owner not within the required 200 feet, who would like to go on record as being opposed. Mr. Rubio stated he wished he had more information to offer the Commission, but all he has to go on is what the client has indicated, which is 25 percent retail and the remainder for office development. Chair declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Sidor commented he would not be in favor of light industrial zoning, as it is not very restr:cttve. He asked if not approved as light industrial, could we approve it for general retail. Hr. Morrie answered yes, but would have to be readver- ttsed and the Commission could not vote on it as general retail at this hearing. Mr. Sidor made a motion to deny 2-1710. Seconded by Mr t . Juren and unanimously carried (7.0). C.1 Z-1726. This is the petition of Charles Watkins, representing Denton-Tedi, Inc., requesting a change in the current zoning classification from residential single family (SF-7) to residential single family (SF-10) on a tract of 6.714 acres situated in the F. Batson Survey, Abstract #43, Denton County. The said tract is part of a 45.10 acre tract being devel- oped as Wostgate Heights located east and adjacent to Greenway Club Estates. Mr. Pereaud stated there were 2 reply forms mailed to property owners and there were no replies. Charles Watkins stated he is representing Denton-Tedi, who is working on a 44 acre subdivision located between Greenway Club Estates and PD 86 as shown on the transpar- ency map. He stated his client feels there is a need for more SF-10 homes in this area, not based on a market survey, but by needs as indicated by individuals. He commented it is a pleasure to be bringing the Commission an up zoning request and would hope it be favorable. No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request. Mr. Pereaud stated this site is currently zoned single family (SF-7) and is located in a low intensity area. He continued technically, SF-10 development is permitted under SF-7 zoning designation since the former is more restrictive than the latter. In this case, the developer is expanding the SF-1D area to include 6.7 r,wt r a~ „yt t.E P 6 Z Minutes February 13, 1983 Page 6 acres of the currently zoned SF-7 tract. While the development is permitted by the regulations, it is our understanding that the developer would like to have the designation changed on the zoning map and so nis applica- tion for a zoning change must go through the normal pro- cedures. Staff recommends approval. Dave Bly, a resident of Greenway Estates asked about the water pressure. He stated he currently has only 35 pounds of pressure. Mr. Ellison explained the procedures of zoning and then Development Review Committee and that those types of problems would be worked out during the platting stage. Mr. Clark added there is going to be a 12 inch water line extended from University down Bonnie Brae and then down Payne Drive. Chair declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Escue made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1726. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried ' (1.0). D. Recommend approval of the preliminary and final replat of the Claude Hill Addition. Mr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 0.836 acres situated south of and abutting Stroud Street and west of and abutting Elm Street. The site is zoned ccaaercial and the purpose of the replat is to create three sep- arate buildiaq sites. Development Review Committee recommends approval. No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request. Chair declarad the public hearing closed. Ms. Cole made s motion to recommend approval of the preliminary and `inal replat of the Claude Hill Addition. Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (7-U). E. Recommend approval of preliminary and final replat of the W.W. Wright Addition, Block 2, Lot 3R. Mr. Persaud stated there were 47 reply forme mailed to property owners; nine were returned in favor and one in opposition. Ms. Marilyn Smith stated she is here to answer any questions the Commission might 'lave. She stated this is an older neighborhood wnich was sold off by metes and bounds and this is the procedure to establish a single family lot. No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request. Mr. Persaui continued, this is a tract of 0.172 acres situated north of and abutting Sens Street and east of Gabor Street. The purpn^a of the replat is to establish a single family (SF-7) lot. He stated the minimum lot width for residential development is 6D feet. The re- plat will treat* a lot of So feet width. In this case since this is the only portion of land remaining in block 20 there is no way that the proposed 1.0t width NO. I AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinanc; ; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein debcribed bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has go in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Chartsr requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds ~r for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 9403 _ 1 4 6 7 8 9 Van Waters b Roger $11,053.63 116 8 ~ 1 0'tes 9403 co S 723.75 5403 4315,18 Chemical Turf $ 1,426.80 9403 ` 15 b 16~ Public Health $ 103.40 9404 All SWAB Wagon Co. S 6,490.00 9407 All Advanced Control Systems $19,039.00 SE*ION II. That byy the accepta►.ce and approval of the above numbered items of tho submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the parsons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. CONTINUATION SECTION I. BID NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 9408 All Dentex Ford 511,357.00 9409 All Precision Foam & Coating $ 81418.00 SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting approved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this S day of March X1985. RICMW 0. KAYOK CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CRWOTTE -A CITY SECKETM CITY OF DENTON,=,TEXAS APPROVED A3 TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PACE 2 t DATE: 3-5-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Membars of the City Council FROM: G. Claris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: BID /9403 HERBICIDES/INSECTICIDES RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder for each item: Items 1,4,6,7,8,9,11, 12,13,141`19,20,21 Van Waters 6 Rogers $119053.63 Items 10 6 17 Lesco 723.75 Items 2,395918 Chemical Turf 11426.80 Items 15 b 16 Public Health 103.40 $13,307.58 BACKGROUND: This bid is for the purchase of an estimated annual supply of herbicides and insecticides for use by the Park Dept. Building Maintenance Department and Waste Water Treatment. PROGR.k4S, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED. Parks, Building Maintenance and Waste Water Treatment FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will come from 1980,-85 budget account number 620-008-0470-8105, 100-003-0064-8105 and 710-004-0598-8703 for some items to be warehouse stock. neAht : s r t 4 • G. Cltc Ir Aalit City Manager PFepared Tine Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent Ap r ved: le n J. Marshal l, C. P.M. urchasing Agent $ID f-- - 9403 SID TITLE_HERBICIDES/INSECTICIDES LESCO HARPOOL VAN-MATERS PUBLIC STES CHEMICAL & OPENED February 12, 1985 2 p.m. INC. SEED A ROGERS HEALTH CHEMICALS U RF EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT 1 3 SUPPLY TY. ITE! DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR 182.00 146.00 235.00 215.00 lomac 130.00 - - - 115.00 106.00 -L JM 2OG Endothal 333.00 372.40 - - 330.00 310.20 lOG Ester-24D - 117.80 108.40 - 125.00 327.00 1749,00 750.00 630.60 Oust 3778.56 4026.24 4066.56 -L-UL-Princep 80 W 150.00 148.00 127.50 143.00 133.00 60G Roundup 30 Gal. 4713.60 4288.20 4044.00 6000.00 4192.80 4418.40 301' Surflan 337.50 369.60 318.90 - 337.50 339.30 30G Trimec 367.00 - 516.00 1086.00 480.90 517.50 INSECTICIDES ygon 2% 64.20 100.00 73.16 68.40 an, Lo 15.03 25.00 l - 114.00 58.20 101.20 - 123.92 109.32 e 82.08 92.04 78.00 - 94.80 82.44 CXO,rrthnen X X - - - 65.00 - - 38.40 38,40 60.40 ID i 9403 Qage 2 ID TITLE LESCO ARPOOL VAN-WATERS PUBLIC STES HEMICAL A PENED INC. EED 6 ROGERS HEALTH HEMICALS URF EQUIPMENT MOUNT 6 SUPPLY TY' TE! DESC IPT ON VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR y ENDOR nTl4rD 56.25 500.00 380.00 MISCELLANEOUS 1 20G Roundup 5 Gal. 1571.20 746.00 %415.84-: 1527.20 558.00 2 4G Roundup Qt. 443.36 406.88 420.16 447.36 451,84 Deliver 10-15 Days 10-14 Days 10 Days 10 Days 10-14 Days D D to e t ton w; DATE: 3-5-85 CITY CO1f;iCIL REPORT FORMAT 'COs Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris llartung, city Manager SUBJECT: BID #9404 ANIMAL CONTROL UNIT R SCOIdM BNDAT19 N: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of SWAB Wagon Co. in the amount of $6,490.00. SU1*1AR Y: This is a fiberglass animal control unit-to be mounted on a new 3/4 ton cab/chassis owned by the City of Denton. This unit is completely removable and we can transfer it to other chassis in years to come. BACKG ROUN us Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFEC'1'liDs Animal Control. FISCAL 114FACT: Funds for this purchase will come from 1984-85 Budget Account #100-002-0044-9104 Capital Expenditures Vehicles and Equipment. Respectfully subus tted: 6 is n City Manager Prepared by: Name Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title Assistant Purchasing Agent Approveds e n J. Marshall, C,P.M, 16406 Purchasing Agent au r g4n4 6LD TITLE Animal -ontrol Unit SCHROER SWAB OPENED February 19, 1985 MFG. WAGON (ANCONCO) CO. WCOUNT 1 ~TENDESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR i Control -Animal Unit 6600.00 6490.00 Deliver 50 Oa s 50 Days DATE: 3-5-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 'f0: Mayor and Members of tltie City Council FROMI G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJ EC T: BID #9407 REMOTE TERMINAL UNIT R ECO1*1EN DATION : we recommend this bid be awarded to the single bidder Advanced Control Systems in the amout of $19,039.00. SUMM AR Y: This bid is for the purchase of a "Remote Terminal Unit" to be utilized in conjunction with our existing S.C.A.D.A. equipment and new Page Road substation. ' BACKGROUND: PROGRNIS, DEPAR'i'MEN'I'S OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Metering and Substation FISCAL IM PACT: 1984-85 Budget Account #611-008-0253-9217-E362 Respectfully subwitted: 12 do City Manager PrtlFsred by: itle John J. Marshall, C. P.M. Purchasing Agent Apps ed s M N~o J, Marshall, C.P.M. ie Purchasing Agent DATE: 3-5-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, .13ty Manager SUBJECT: BID 09408 AIR COMPRESSOR RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of Dentex Ford in the amount of $11,357.00 with delivery in 7-14 days., SUMMARY: This is a Motor Pool Replacement and will -be assigned to the Water 6 sewer Department. It replaces unit number 6164. ' BACKGRUUND: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS,DEPARTMBNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Motor Pool, Vehicle Maintenance and Water A Sewer Field Services. FISCAL 114PACT: 1984-85 Budget Account #620-008-0461-9104 $ 6,507.00 Motor Pool Replacement 4,850.00 Total 511051.00 ResPectfullY submitted: • AA.AA G"TI-TWILMNS- d' City Manager Pr pored y 1 name Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title Assistant Purchasing Agent Approveds Mr' Jake am n J. Marshall , .P,M. Ti a urchasing Agent iv v qm ID TITLEEj~ cnpg;~ DENTEX ARTHOLOW ROSS RACRAC PENED February 19. 1985 2 p.m. FORD CHINERY MACHINERY SUPPLY CCOUNT I TV. IT M DESCR.4PTION VENDOR VENDOR VCRDOR VLI DOR VENDOd VENDOR VENDOR 1 1 Air Compressor 11,357.00 119541.00, No Bid 11,500.00 Deliverv. Davs_ 15-20 Days 14-21 Davsl Model #185DP LeRDI JOY Su a r Q 18 5 D PE m D Q3 i I M: 1; ` 1W L } 12,E DATS1 3-5-85 I CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO; Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Mans.ger SUBJECT: BID #9409 ROOF FOR NEW ADDITION TO MUNICIPAL BUILDING RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that this bid as specified and bid by four vendors for an asphalt built up roof be rejected. We then recommend the alternate bid for the urethane foam including the deck, foam, and Polymate coating be accepted at the price of $8,418.00. SUMM AP.Y: The low bid for the built-up roof is $7,777.00 by Gunn 8 Briggs Inc. with a 2 year warranty. The recommended bid submitted by Precision Foam b Coating of Denton'is $641.00 higher with a 10 year insured warranty. We feel this is the lowest and best bid for the City of Denton with delivery as soon as weather permits. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Alternate Bid Proposal PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Recommended by Bob Tickner and Jerry Frederick Special Expansion and Remodelling Funds 430-004-020M-9136 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund. Respef~fuy s but tted: G. Ct a g City Manager Pre red by: it" ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent App ved: as o r. Marshall, C.P.M. itic Purchasing Agent HID TITLE ROOF - NEW ADDITION 1 OPENED _ Fahruar4 1Q, 19A5 _ 9 p m,___ ELL GUNN & TRINITY AY PRECISION ACCOUNT I OOFING BRIGGS ROOFING ROOFING FOAM A COATING QTy ITEM DESCRIYfION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENOOR VENDOR Built-Up Asphalt Roof 308.00 1,777.00 10,780.00 ,189.00 ALTERNATE BID: Urethane Foam with Pol ate 8,418.00 oating CITYoiDENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $66.8200 M E M. O R A N D U M TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent FROM: Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks DATE: February 22, 1985 SUBJECT: New City Hall Addition Roof Bid I have reviewed the results of roof bid number 9409. I wish to recommend that the alternate bid received from Precision Foam and Coatings, Denton, Texas, be accepted for the new roof on the addition to City Hall at $8,418. This bid is for a sprayed in place polyurethane roof with an elastomeric coating. We have fc.und this type of roof to be quite satisfactory at the Civic Center, Library and sections on the Central Fire Station. It offers an ~iditional insulation factor as well as a white reflective coating which reduces inside heat build up. Also, a ten year insured warranty against labor and material defect is provided. This system compares to the specified asphalt built up type roofs which offer little inherent insulation factor and only a two year warranty. We have had several asphalt type roof failures on existing buildings, some within the first year of installation. The asphalt bid price of $7,777 compares to the alternate urethane bid using polymate coating of $8,418. I feel the difference is warranted in the increased insulation value, the extended warranty, and the satisfactory applications of it on existing City buildings. obert K. T ckner 11EM00288 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT / 817.387.61460 566.8)70 i NO. _ AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUELIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS. PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improve- ments in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinaries; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or fmprovements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, i'HE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita- tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 9400 American Appraisal Assneiatac tAn,ann nn SECTION 11. That the acceptance and approval of the above competititve bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract ants furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the Award of the bid. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorzied to excecute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works of tzprovements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantitites and specified sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the p+:blic works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 5 day of March 1985 RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYQ1[ CITY OF DEMON, TEXAS ATTEST: CRULOTTF ALLERj CITY SE ETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY : DATE: 3-5-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: G. Cliris Hartung, C1-y Manager SUBJECT: BID 09400 PROPOSALS TO VALUE CITY FIXED ASSETS R ECUMM ENDA'1'10 N: We recommend this bid be awarded to American Appraisal Associates for items 1 and 4 for the total amount of $60o4OO.0O. SUMM AR Y: We received two Proposals and after evaluation by Mr. Jay Anderson and Mr. John McGrane of the Finance Department, it has been determined that both proposals were acceptable. However, American Appraisal has been determined to be the lowest and best proposal. BACKGROUND: Proposal ' PROGRAI•IS, _DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: This will be a benefit and affect all Department/Divisons of the City, locating and identifying all capital assets. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact on General Fund. Respe;,tfu y s bw tted: l;: Cl:r a ig City Manager Pared by: ' r h J. Marshall, C.P.M. 4Pftle Purchasing AGent A ved: m e 6n, Marshall, C.P.M. itie urchasing Agent 1 { VOLUME 2, SECTION I CITY OF DENTON - REQUEST 'OR PROPOSAL AFPENDIX C PROPOSAL COST SUMMARY Project Cost The city would like to evaluate: this project cost according to the following elements: r City Assistance Project Element Price _ Needed 5 1. Physical inventory, 54,000 Yes asset valuation, and Records Assistance reports thereon 2. Fixed asset accounting 10,000 Yes system software Training 3. Software maintenance 1,500* No (annual) 4. Accounting policies 6,400 Yes and procedures manual Minimal 5. Lump sum price 1 71,900 NA through 3 6. Annual accounting 51000 Yes service Input Tape or Documents 7. Per diem rate for 760 NA additional services • See Volume 2, Section 3 NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCOR- DANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, state law requires that certain contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding $5,000 br by competitive bids, except in the case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approv, all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness :shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: • SECTION I: That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public health of the c:':izens of the ci:y, or to provide for unforseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved; i J PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT 66388 Crane Packing Company S 3,226.40 66959 Interstate Equipment Rental S 3,250.27 67080 Boyd Excavation S 1,020.00 67002 Heil Company S 3,244.71 67203 Jagoe Public $21,375.00 SECTION t1. That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 5 day of Marc?, , 1965 RICHARD • STEWART1 MAYON CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST : Ch-ARLOTTE 1 LLLENj CITY CITY OF DEWON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. HORRISo ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS BY. PAGE 2 g' r w 'rt a• ,i ; 'nr .k A. f,r ~KY~ DATE: 3-5-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Cltiris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 166388 CRANE PACKING COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase in the amount, of $3,226.40 for repair parts for the Electric Production Division of the Utility Department he approved for payment. SUh1bIAR. Y: This is an emergency Purchase order for the purchase of repair parts on pumping units at the Electric Plant. These are one source specialty items. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order and Invoice Copy PROGRkIS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFEC'rED: Utility Department Production Division Account #610-008-0251-8339-E312 FISCAL 114PACT: There is no impact on the General Fund. Respectfully ~ubwltted: City Manager ?re pared y: In Marshall, C.P.M. it 1 urchasing Agent Ap roved: . Marshall, C.P.14. It Purchasing Agent ~-nrt ` 21S E Mc~f tVEY ST. PU 1C~f E'ORDER • OENtb'J TX 7 201 P. O. NUMBER DATEIVENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPE 66388 01/68/65 COS S CRA45001 VENDOR: SHIP TO: JOHN CRANE ELECTRIC PRODUCTION CRANE PACKING,COMPANY. CONFIRMATION ONLY 6400 M. OAKTON ST% 00 NOT DUPLICATE MORTON GROVE* IL 60053 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUNT 01 610 008 0251 E312 8339 2 10F-24475-•160-0537 SLEEVE 19708.60 02 610 008 0251'E319 8339 2 5A9-3500-90-0550 RETAINER 815000 03 610 008 0251.E312 8339 2 21A9-3500-91-0550 PUMPING RING 611.60 4 610 008 0251 :E312 .5339 6 ' 11-x0000-233--9548 O-RING 32.70 15 610 008 0251.E312 8339, 6 15-0000-252-9548 O.RING 58.50 CO~d TOTAL FOR P+O. 3,226.40 The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House 2111 No. 20. Rehxence P.O. Number on all K Shipments and Inyolces. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. -96, Send Invoices TO: Direct All Inquiries TO. City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. McKinney St., canton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent Phone 8171588-8223 8171586.8311 D&W Metro 267-0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer I 6400 w 0010e Snell RMSGMvc IL T.lpnone. 13 121967-2400 me ~ ~ b 00UlA 00SJ -0SOS JohnCrane MOMOM TIE Days International Sealing Systems I N,SN"WeS 4347 SOLD TO: SHIP TO: ? DENTON CITY OF DENTON CITY OF ACCTS PAY 215 MCKINNEY 1701 A SPENCER RD DENTON TX 76201 DENTON TX 76201 I MAi< rOVR REMITTANCE TO. INOURiES REGAROING 1'4S INVOICE. PO BOX 84099 CALL: DALLASI TX 75284 7131 921-8250 H-241702 CUIT014911 oftoca NO. SALES% W ACCOUNT NO. "YocEOATE 66388 .1398 22296-01 2 5 Joe NO. SHIP v1A s W"A DAM[ RAGE H80712Z 61 41 10 PI be hs OLYWITry DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DIV 1 F2875-160-0537 SLEEVE PROOuA949 854.30/EA 19T08060 2 0IV 1 A9-3500-090-0530 RETAINER PR00=AO99 407.50/EA 815900 j ..DIV 1 A9-3500-091-0550 PUMPING RMG PROO=4099 305.80/EA 611.60 DIV 1 0000-233-9548 0-RIN6 PRQ00 949 5.45/EA 32.70 DIV 1 0000-252-9548 PROO=A949 9.75/EA 58050 PPI 7.17 . I FEB 21 MAC CDP4 k- NOTE'S AKE CHECKS PAYABLE T01 JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLEt te. BRMERLY CRANE PACKING 1% LATE CHANU PER MONTH WILL APPLY TMIS v MR .(T^~LG1>afAPLptEgCTgyJf pup,`M fy FORTSf ON THC RiVEg41 4 ptD`?ION OF SAl[IMEMIC A~[ SET MAT[RIALTQTAL 2 ~A 1AL99AN0f"6 WETAxEI U McMteM1r w moo n.w4 rAw.wws rwwWM~M ♦RIRAiO,RANSPORTA1 F4 o" INVOICE TOTAL A al fonts ou" RIv.I v JOHN CRANE - HOUOAILLE, INC, ? 239.57 ORIGINAL INVOICE DATE: 3-5-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of tlte City Council PROM: G. Cliris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #66959 INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT RENTAL R ECOMM EN DAT10N: We recommend this purchase order number 66959 to Interstate Rental in the amount of $3,260.21 be approved. SUMM AR Y: This purchase order is for the emergency repairs to unit #20049 a 1979 Peterbilt roll-off refuse truck. The front and rear differential was replaced. BACKGROUND: Purchase order 166959 and Interstate Rental Invoice #0062 PROGRAMS, DEPAR'T'MENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Vehicle Maintenance FISCAL IMPACT. 1984-85 Budget Funds Account Number 710-004-0598-8710 Vehicle Maintenance Sublet Repairs Respectfully submitted: • U1 u City Manager Pre red by: ame Tam D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: N h J. 6 rshaI19 C.P.M. Me Pu chasing Agent IQITT~ 216E WkIN, BEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 782o1 P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPE VENDOR: 61 r 02/11/85 C1%HIPTO: S INT8100 1 INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT RENTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE P90. OOX 50089 CONFIRMATION ONLY 5601 SOUTH STEMMONS DO NOT DUPLICATE CORINTH(OENTON)9 TX 76206-0089 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOUN' 01 710 004 0598 8710 1 02004 REPLACE 2DIFFERENTIALAS 39260927 The City of Denson, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. Reference P.O. Number on all Bit., Shipments and Invoices. O Shipments are F.O.S. City of Denton, or as Indicated. jDR Send Invoices T0: TOT/reel All Pnlulilee T0: 39260.27 Cily of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent Phone 8171588,9223 8171688'8311 DIFW Metro 2874042 The City of Donlon Is an equal opportunity employer IV" UUb 'M BTHO 430-1991 LAXE`Wu" oEMTON P171 401-12" 0171387•saae _ City/Location oe it IC No.TV^~. 6501 S. lTEMMONS • CORINTH (DENTON) TEXAS 70206 a Date +6 x r~ Make Continuation from Repair Order No. _ Miles/Hours- Model Parts Code, Description of Work to be done Initials ENuummber Coder Hours Time off./on Number Qty and DHeriptlon D _R zoC . v Z n o ' ~F- a r O Y C ~ ~ J SJ sA i- Cause o -2) C • C re ion r _ L o 4 ~ ~L? q e-1 o P -w # J / t 5 0 o contact h no Cc'oany Ns • ~ ~ a Repair LoadOn Outside Repairs ` Total Labor Hrs. d Vendor. P.O. No. Total Parts Vendur P.O. No. Tex Vendor P.O. No. Total .k r TOTAL ' Parts Vendor P.O. No. Check one box only ED Maint. t7 C Co PM C Warror.y M Customer Req. U ® Abus• S M Malfunction 8 ® Ac Shop Sem - Bra h Manager Date Warranty (Cherd. one) % 8 M Other E..® Gpitiotldo C] yes O No v w DATE: 3- 6- 85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #67002 HEIL COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase order for repair parts be approved for a pump in the amount of $3,176.96, and air freight for $67.75, for the total of $3,244.71. SU14MARY: This is for a pump for solid waste truck, our equipment 11852. BACKGROUND: purchase order copy and invoice copy ' PROGRAMS, DEPARrI'MENTS OR GROUPS AFFECT61): The Vehicle Maintenance Department (Working Capital) and Solid Waste Utility FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted repair b maintenance 710-004-0598-8702 Garage Working Capital. There is no impact on the General Fund. Resp'a tfu y sub:a tied: G. unris g City Manager P aced by: r hn J. Marshall, C.P.M it Purchasing Agent Approvedi an: : J. KArshall, C.P.M. 4 lti Purchasing Agent a I " B r0.' , it r . 215 E MCKINNEY ST. UIiCwASE ORDER DENTON, TX 78244 P. 0. NUMBER DATENENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPI 67002 02/18/85 C14 S' HEI49001 VENDOR: SHIP TO: HEIL COMPANY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 320 CORPORATE CONFIRMATION ONLY CHATANOOGA, TN 37419 DO NOT DUPLICATE ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN' 11 71f) 004 0598 8702 1 1852 219938 PUMP 39176o96 )2 7l0 004 0598 8702 1 FREIGHT 67.75 cat JTJ~ AT10ij The City of Dent.)n,.Taxes Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. o L FOR P•O• 39244.71 Reference P.O. Number on all Bit., Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. Send Invoices TO: Direct All Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, O.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent Phone 81715044 8171588.8811 DIFVI Metro 287-0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer 3r Xa t SERVICE PARTS .S ORDER FORM Date PARTS CENTRAL 'Purchase Order No. TERMS ORDERED BY •2c~D~- , Ship Via: _ `~~Prepaid C3 F01-In r i / collect C3 Rush/Unit Down j~ -d Sold To: 2 Ship To: C D~sl Code fir. c~ _ c Same ' '""Part Number Uuantlty " ' uescrlptlon c ) 1 r r / V _ Y . I / Page AUTHOMUD SIGNATURE i All pity 1 I ~ ■ 7 )f, l? ril l DATE: 3-5-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO,, Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: G. Chris Hartwig, City Manager SUBJECT: Purchase Order #67080 80YD EXCAVATION RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order in the amount of $7,020.00 be approved. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the rental of a self-loading scraper being used at the landfill in a continuing effort to expedite the opening of the landfill. BACIkQROUN D: This Will be the last order for emergency equipment rental if we continue on the present schedule for excavation. PROGRAMS, DEPARDIENTS Olt GROUPS AFFECTED: Solid Waste De?artment and Landfill Operations H SC A L 114PACT: Funds for this purchase order will be taken from the 1984-85 Budget Account Number 631-002-0803-8EO2 Sanitary Landfill Bond Program. Respectfully submitted: City Manager Pre 7ed by- Name Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: ra a \J n J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E MctgNNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTOi ' TX 7=1 P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPI 67080 02120/85 SOLID WASTE S BOY49000 VENDOR: SHIP TO: 80YO EXCAVATING 3500 FT WORTH OR DENTONs TTX 76201 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION w BID NO. LINE AMOUN' 91 631 OD2 0803 8509 108 HR SCRAPER RENTAL LANDFILL 70020000 C 0h'FM11 All 0 N The City of Denton, Texas is tax exempt • House Bill No. 2P. FOR P.O. 79020.00 Reference P.O. Number on all BJI., Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. Send Invoices TO: Direct AN InquIdes TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payeb;e John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, G.P.M. Aset. Purchasing Agent Phone 8171588.8223 8171568.8.411 DIFW Metro 287-0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer Ikf y UA1' fi : 3- 5- 85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Meabers of the City council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #67203 JAGOE PUBLIC RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order in the amount of $279375.00 be approved and the invoice from Jagoe Public be proces.,ed for payment. ' SUMN AR Y: This project was going to be done in-rouse by our own Street Department. Poor weather conditions and One need to expedite the landfill opening forced us into an emergency situation. BACKGROUND: This purchase order is for the overlay of Spencer Road from Loop 288 to the new landfill site. This has been a . lightly traveled rural road. However, it will become a heavily traveled main access to the new landfill. This additional traffic made the overlay and widening a must. PROGRPAS, DEPARTMENTS OR G.IOUPS AFFECTED. Solid Waste Department and Landfill Operations FISCAL 114PACT: Funds for this emergency purchase will come from the 1984-85 B#jdget Account Number 631-002-0803-4105 Sanitary Landfill Bond Funds. Res s b~tted: • C: L;orls g City Manager Pre red bye .s '7 1, Name tam b. Shaw, C.P.M. Tit19 Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved, e a h J. Marshall, P. M. T a urchasing Agent CITY & DENTOt , TEXAS 215 E. McKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 78201 P. O. NUMBER DATEIVENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYI 67203 02/21/85 SOLID WASTE JAG49000 VENDOR: SHIP TO: JAGOE PUBLIC CONST. CO. P O Box 250 DENTON• TX* 76201 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOU 01 631 002 0803 9105 l OVERLAY SPENCER RD-2v430 FT 27.375.0t The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. FOR P.O. 27s 375.01 Reference P.O. Number on all BIL, Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. Send Involaa TO. Direct All Inquiries TO, City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent . Phone 817/688.8223 81716888311 DIF.V Metro 2674042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer i t, 'c' i;;. t,r rw _.r. n o`r 'x h -yJ y x iti'<.+;r rtli It4o= • JA GOE-PUBLIC COMPA. `J GENERAL OFFICES Tel. AC 817.382.2581 P.O. Box' 50 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 2-15-85 ,19 REFERTO 636 INVOICE A CHARGE TO: City of Denton AT: M un- ndg. Denton, Texas 76201 seKUs Due on receipt QUANTITY DESCRIP'T'ION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 912.50 Tons Type IUD" HMAC produced, hauled, and placed on Spencer Road. Blading shoulders for extra width, brooming and cleanings and tacking. $ MOO $ 279375.00 i k ` 4r F, T '77 1 Du CITYoI DENTON# TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE f817) 566.8200 M E M O R A N D U M T0: The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt G. Chris Hartung, City Manager DATEt February 26, 1985 SUBJECT: BIRD ROOST ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION: inhabitants of bird roosts, within the City of Denton, can be placed in two categories (i.e., protected and target species of migratory birds). Presently, the City's most prevalent bird roost problem arises from protected species of migratory birdsl therefore, Staff has developed an ordinance which addresses only protected species of migratory birds. The ordinance shall be amended, at a later date, to include target species of migratory birds. In order to protect the health and safety of our citizens, as well as preventing their disturbance, Staff recom- mends the acceptance of the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND: As indicated during the February 29, 1985, Council Meeting, the ordi- nance is composed of four major segments. The method of eradicating bird roosts and thr person(s) responsible for eradicating them makes up the first segment. Secondly, the procedure of informing violators of the ordinance is discussed along with the abatement and collection of cost practices. Thirdly, the ordinance provides a means for violators to appeal the abatement costy and finally, the ordinance concludes by outlining other penalties for failing or refusing to comply with its requirements. ui BIRD ROOST ORDINANCE February 26, 1965 Page 2 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED% The primary divisions which shall be affected by the passage of the ordinance, in reference, are the Animal Control and Code Enforcement Divisions. Animal Control wil'i'ze required to locate and identify bird roosts and Code Enforcement will inform the appropriate property owners of the required changes. The above-mentioned divisions will be totally responsible for the application of the ordinance; and if applied effec- tively, it will drastically reduce the burden and complaints focused at other segments of our organization due to bird control programs. CISCAL IMPACTt There is no is fact on the general fund. Respectfully submitted, .4 1*4 G. Chris Haltung City Manager Prepared by+ Harlan J son Adminie ra(ive Assistant Approved byt Bill Angelo Assistant to the Director of Public works HJ/sc Pw 4 Ib 77 77 1033E NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY REPEALING AND REENACTING ARTICLE VI THEREOF DECLARING THE ROOSTS OF PROTECTED MIGRATORY BIRDS A PUBLIC NUISANCE WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SUCH BIRD ROOSTS WITH PROCEDURES FOR ABATEMENT AND APPEAL; ADDING A NEW ARTICLE VII TO BE RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE; ADDING A NEW ARTICLE VIII TO PROVIDE FOR A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That Article VI of Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, heretofore relating to penalties, is hereby reraled in its entirety and reenacted to hereafter read as follows: ARTICLE VI. PROTECTED MIGRATORY BIRD ROOSTS Sec. 12-31. Definition. A protected migratory bird roost shall mean any place where • migratory birds, whose species is protected by applicable law or treaty, live, gather or nest for a period of at least seven (7) consecutive days, congregating in numbers of fifty (50) or more and returning to such flab tat annually. Sec. 12-32. Declared a Nuisance. Protected migratory bird roosts are hereby determined to be a health hazard which constitutes a public nuisance. Sec. 12-33. Elimination of Roosts. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, partnership, association, owner, agent, lessee, occupant, or anyone having control or supervision of any lot, tract, cr parcel of land, or portion thereof, occupied or unoccupied, improved or unimtoyed, within the corporate limits of the City to suffer or permit treat to exist within fifteen (15) feet of one another, measured from trunk to trunk, on premises which has been used as a protected migratory bird roost or to leave debris or remains of vegetation upon the premises after the same has been cut to eliminate the roost. protected proceeding to enforce the (b) It provisions ofalthis s Article defense to presently occupying the roost or that the premises upon which the roost is located is n lot, tract or parcel of land of four (4) or more acres, is zoned agricultural, is under s! nle ownership, and the roost is located more than two hundred (200) feet from any adjacent property under different ownership on which habitable dwellings exist and more than two hundred (200) feet from any public street or right of way. • (c) It shall be the duty of any person referred to in paragraph (a) hereof to cut, or cause to be cut, and remova, or cause to be removed, such trees as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of this Article. PAGE 1 "•E!. 'i ji%~,' .d v ~_,..Q ~ gyp, ~y 't Sec. 12-34. Notice to Owner of Violations; Abatement by City; Collection of Costa. In the event that the owner of any lot, tract or parcel of land or portions thereof shall fail or refuse to comply with Section 12-33 the City Manager or his designee shall notify such owner by letter addressed to him at his post office address, or by publication in the newspaper at least two (2) times within ten (10) consecutive days, if service by mail may not be had as aforesaid or if the owner's address be not known, and at the expiration of ten (10) days after notification as provided herein, the city may enter upon such premises and may do such work as necessary, or cause the same to be done, in ordo-r that the premises may comply with the requirements of this Article. A statement of the cost incurred by the city to abate such condition shall be mailed to the owner of said premises, which statement shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the date of the mailing thereof. Such costs shall include an administrative fee of eighty dollars (;80.00), in adlition to the actual cost of cutting and removing such trees as may be necessary to comply with this Article. In the event that said statement has not been paid within such period, the City Manager or his designee may file a statement with the County Clerk of the expenses incurred to abate such condition on said premises, and the city shall nave a privileged lien on any lot, tract or parcel of land upon which such expense is incurred second only to tax liens and liens for street improvements, together with ten (10) percent on the delinquent amount from the date such payment is due. For any such expenditure and interest suit may be instituted and recovery and • foreclosurb had in the name of the city and the statement so made, or a certified copy thereof, shall be prima facie proof of the amount expended in any such work performed by the City. Sec. 12-35. Appeals from Amount Billed. Within fifteen (15) days of the date a statement of costa is mailed to the owner of the premises, such owner may appeal the reasonableness of the charges billed for abating the condition to the City Council by filing a written statement with the City Manager or his designee stating why such charges are unreasonable. Such appeal shall be submitted to the City Council within a reasonable time after filing. The City Council shall review the charges and may, upon finding such charges unreasonable, &$east such costs as it deems reasonable. The administrative fees shall not be appealable. Sec. 12-36 to 12.39. Reserved. SECTION 11. That Chapter 12 of the lode of Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended by adding a new Article VII0 Sections 12-40 to 12.50, to be reserved for future use. SECTION III. That Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended by adding a new Article VIII, heretofore codified and published as Article V1, to read as follows: ARTICLE VIII. PENALTIES • Sec. 12.51. penalties. (1) Any person who shall violate a provision of this chapter, or fails to comply therewith or bath any of the requirements PAGE 2 'Y;;~ r . ''r r. v h~ !1 ♦ • A v ~v. h . >t ~ t . 'r ' +r' r.✓ .It thereof, or of a permit, license or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not leas than ten dollars (=10.00) nor core than two hundred dollars ($200.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this chapter is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violation such person shall be punished within the limits provided above. (2) The imposition of the penalties herein prescribed shall not preclude the City Attorney from instituting an appropriate action or proceeding to prevent an unlawful accumulation, collection and/or movement or garbage within the terms of the chapter stated above, or to restrain, correct or abate a violation of said ordinance, or prevent an illegal act, conduct, business or use in or about any premises or any public nuisance or health hazard. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) daga from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1985. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SUMM CITY OF DENTON,tTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEM FORM: JOE 0. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY:e'i~s!'F 7CY PAGE 3 DATE: :lduPi r << i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing the existing arti- cle and other provisions relating to signs and reenacting a new Article 17 of Appendix B-zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas to prcvide for the regulating of signs and the permitting thereof.... RECOMMENDATION: The Planning S Zoning Commission recoma9nded approval oZ a more restrictive sign ordinance by a vote of 6-0. SUMMARY: The ordinance has been revised in accordance with the desires expressed by a majority of the City Council at several study sessions. BACKGROUNWhe 1974 Denton Comprehensive Plan called for revision of the sign ordinance. Several efforts to revise the sign ordinance in the last 10 years were unsuccessful. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:Sign enforcement and permitting should be easier; the building inspection division will be responsible for impl mentation; sign companies and users will be affected. FISCAL IMPACT:The fee structure was designed to recover cost. Should the Texas Legislature require cities to reimburse sign owners for removal of non-concorming signs, the City Council should reconsider the termination period. Reconsideration need not take place until 1994. Respectfully submitted: City Manager Pre ared by: Time, Consultant tle Appr ve e e Director of P anning and Community Development qriJ NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE EXISTING ARTICLE 17 AND OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO SIGNS AND REENACTING A NFW IRTICLE 17 OF APPENDIX B- ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATING OF SIGNS AND THE PERMITTING THEREOF* PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS (:200.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds that the regulation of the site, location, height, use, maintenance, construction and placement of signs and other outdoor advertising devices and structures is necessary to prevent impediments and dangers to drivers and pedestrians upon and along City streets, sidewalks and easements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds that the use of signs and other outdoor advertising devices and structures, if unregulated, can, because of their number, placement, and characteristics, adversely affect property values; aesthetically damage the overall environment; create an unfavorable business climate which hampers attempts to attract and retain desirable commercial and business enterprises; and foster conditions that lessen the enjoyment and desirability of the City of Denton as a place in which to visit, live and work; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds that portable or mobile signs present special traffic hazards when towed on public streets or displayed on or along public right-of-ways; act as impediments to the effectiveness of the police and fire departLents in performing their duties; present dangers to the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Denton because of their mobility, their propensity to be blown about if not properly anchored, and, if lighted, present special hazards of electrical use not found in other signs; and WHEREAS, Article 1175 (24), Texas Revised civil statutes specifically enuserates as one of the powers possessed by the PAGE 1 . ai .k Y fll 91 Y,~j+ u'. •t. 9. r, r r ; • City of Denton is the authority to regulate, license and control or prohibit the erection of signs and billboards; NOW, THEREFOREs THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Article 17 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby in all things repealed. SECTION II. That s new Article 17 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby adopted to hereafter read as follows: ARTICLE 17. SIGN REGULATIONS A. General Provisions 1. Purpose 5 Intent 2. Definitions 3. Signs Not Regulated 4. Prohibited Signs Administration 6 Enforcement B. Permits C. Portable Signs D. Regulation of Signs by Zoning Districts E. Regulation of Attached Signs F. Removal of Abandoned or Unlawful Signs G. Special Provisions 1. Manner of Measurement 2. Setback Clearance Zone 3. Signs on Certain Highways 4. Clearance from Electrical Lines S. Temporary L Political Signs 6. Sign Maintenance 7. Identification of Signs R. Nonconforming Signs 1. Special Exceptions Allowed J. Historical Landmark Signs K. Conflicting Provisions A. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose of this Article to regulate the construction, fraction, placement, maintenance, use and removal of private signs within the City of Denton, Texas. PACP I ~Tl It is the intent of this Article to regulate signs generally by classifying each sign according to its design and construction and by regulating, based an such classification, the type, number, size, height and setback of signs according to location in the various zoning districts. It is also the intent and determination of the City Council that t*..ese regulations be and are the minimum necessary and least burdensomd to accomplish the purposes heretofore stated. 2. Definitions. The following words, as used in this Article or Article 1, shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them, as follows; (a) "Advertising" shall mean to seek the attraction or to direct the attention of the public to any location, event, person, activity, goods, services, or merchandise whatsoever. (b) "Business Purposes" shall mean the use of any property, building, or structure, permanent or temporary, for the purpose of conducting any commercial enterprise or activity. (c) "Curb line" shalt mean an imaginary line drawn along the outermost part or back of the curb and gutter on either side of a public street, or, if there is no curb and gutter along the outermost portion of the paved roadway, or, if there is no paved roadway, along the edge of the traveled portion of the roadway. (d) "Effective area" means the area enclosed by the minimum imaginary rectangle or vertical and horizontal lines which fully contains all extremities of a sign (or signs), exclusive of its supporting structure. This rectangle is to be calculated from an orthographic projection of the sign viewed horizontally. A vie,4point for this projection is to be taken which gives the lar. Best rectangle of that kind, as the viewpoint is rotated horizontally around the sign. If elements of the sign are movable or flexible, as a flag or string of lights, the measurement shall o taken when the elements are fully extended and parallel to the plane of view. (e) "Non•Residenti•l Zoning District" means any zoning district desi8nated as a P Of NS, GR, C, LI or HI distribt as shown on the official zoning district map of the City of Denton. (f) "Owner" means a person who has legal title, control or possession of property. (g) "Premise" shall mean a lot, parcel or tract of reel property as shown on a plat approved in accordance with law and filed with the County Clerk'a office or an un- platted tract of land as conveyed by deed or operation PACE 3 'i a a5 ns ? r GA 1E'-.q ny 1 :f .p~, ♦ X~ l +of law and recorded in the official deed records of the County Clerk's Office. (h) "Residential Zoning District" means any zoning district designated as an A, SF-1, SF-10, SF-17, SF-16 2-F, MF-R, MF-1 or MF-1 district as shown on the official zoning district map of the City of Denton. (i) "Side Yard Setback Lines" mean the imaginary lines drawn parallel to the aide yard lot line or property liras on a premise which delineate the minimum required side yard areas for that premise. 0 "Sign" shall mean cny flag, light, picture, balloon, letter, word, message, symbol, plaque, billboard, poster, painting, wind device, or similar device or object designed or used for advertising. For purposes of this Article, particular types of signs are further defined herein as followA: (1) "Abandoned Sign" shall mean a sign which was at one time, but is not now, used as an on-premise sign, because the business purpose of the premises has changed or ceased, and the sign is not being used as a lawful off-premise sign. (2) "Attached Sign" shall mean any sign attached to, applied on or supported by, any part of a building (such as a vall, roof, window, car.opys awning, or marquee) which encloses or covers usable space. Wall signs, roof signs and projecting signs shall be considered attached signs. "Dilapidated or Deteriorated Sign" shall mean a sign: (aa) Where elements of the surface or background can be seen as viewed from the normal viewing distance (intended viewing distance), to have portions of the finished material or paint flaked, broken off, or missing, or otherwise not in harmony with the rest of the surface; or (bb) Where the structural support or frame members are visibly bent, broken, dented, or torn; or (cc) Where the pane: is visibly cracked or in the case of wood and similar products, splintered in such a way as to constitute an unsightly or harmful condition; or (dd) Where the sign, or its elements are twisted or leaning or at angles other than those at which it was originally erected (such as may result from being blown or the failure of a structural support); or (as) Where the message or wording can no longer be clearly read by a person with normal eyesight under normal viewing conditions, (4) "Ground Sign" shall aeon a sign vhose principal support is provided by burying, anchoring or other- wise connecting the sign, or supporting structure PAGE 4 $lT'f ~ri`__.~s~~ ~ ~.i;a ~y ri.,. a. f ra q~F r• *rn --~r~ -r'~~ a. 1:.:?. ^,I thereof, to the ground in such a manner as not to be easil., or quickly rer.:ved or relocated, and which is not a stake sign, portable sign or attached sign. (S) "Off-Premise Sign" shall mean any sign advertising a business, activity, goods, productu or services not usually located oa the premises where the sign is located or which directs persons to any premise other than where such sign is located. (6) "On-Premise Stgn" shall mean any sign advertising the business, person, activity, goods, products or services primarily located, sold or offered for sale on the premises where the sign is located. A sign which promotes or displays a political, religious or ideological thought, belief, opinion or other noncommercial neasage shall be considered an on-premise sign. (7) "One Sign" or "A Sign" shell mean Any number of signs located on or supported by a single supporting structure. (8) "PO[taLole Sign" shall mean a sign whose principal supporting structure is intended, by design or construction, to be used by resting upon the ground for support and which may be easily and quickly moved or relocated for reuse. Portable signs shall include, but not be limited to, signs mounted upon or designod to be mounted upon a trailer, bench, wheeled carrier or other non-motorized mobile structure with or without wheels; and A-frame signs and other similar signs, or supporting structures thereof, resting or leaning on the ground or other structures but not permanently attached thereto. (9) "Projecting Sign" shall mean any sign which is wholly affixed to, or supported by any building wall, and which extends beyond the building wall more than twelve (12") inches. (10) "Roof Sign" shall mean any sign wholly erected on, affixed to, constructod on, maintained upon, supported by, or located upon any roof of any buiLdtng. (11) "Stake Sign" shall mean a sign whose principal suo- porting structure is to designed or shaped, usually y asking one and pointed, so as to be erected and used by push in , pounding, hammering or forcing into the ground and allowing quick and easy removal and relocation from one place to another. (17) "Wall Sign" shall mean any sign whoLl,y affixed to, supported by, or painted upon the wall of any building, and which is not a projecting sign. (k) "Supporting Structural' means any pole, post, cable, or other structural fixtures, or parts, to arranged or used so as to hold, secure or support a sign, or part thereof, and which is not imprinted or labeled with an picture, symbol, letters, numbers, or words in excess of one inch in height not is 'nternally or decoratively illuminated. (1) "Wind Device" Otani any flag, banner, pennant, streamer or similar devi^,e that moves freely in the air. PACE 5 I III 3. Signs Not Regulated. The following types of signs shall be exempt from the provisions of this Article: (a) Governmental Si ns. Any sign erected or maintainea pursuant o an in discharge of any governmental function or which is required by law, ordinance or governmental regulation. (b) Railway Signs. Any sign within or on railway property and p ace or Maintained in reference to the operation of such railway. (c) Utilit Si ns. Signs marking utility or underground commun cat ons or trar..,ission lines. (d) Vehicle SL ns. Signs displayed or used upon vehicles, tra ties or aircraft unless such vehicle, trailer or aircraft on which such sign is displayed is permanently stationed or regularly used at a fixed location to serve the same or similar purpose of a permanent or portable sign not affixed to a vehicle, trailer or aircraft. (e) Signs Not Visible From Street. Any sign where no part o such Sign Is v s a eom any public street. (f) Holiday, Religious Signs. Temporary holiday or religious signs w ou commercial advertising. (g) Signs on Persons. Nand held signs, or signs, symbols or displays on persons or animals. (h) Unused Signs, Signs being manufactured, transported or stored-and-not being used, in any manner or form, for purposes of advertising. (i) plaques. Commamorstive plaques of recognized stor cal societies end organizations. (j) Private Traffic Control. On-premise signs which direct e movemsn o tra c on private property entrance and exit signs) or warn of obstacles, ova head clearances or control parkinU- provided that such signs are less then 10 feet in Mective area, are less than 6 feet in height, and are not placed so as to interfere with the safe movement of vehicles or pedestrians. (k) Mail Boxes, Newspaper Racks. Signs located on mail oyes, newspaper van ng machines, and curbside resi- dential newspaper holders which identify the owner and address of the premises or the name of the newspaper sold or subse0.bed to; provided, that such devices are not placed so as to interfere with the safe movement of pedestrians or vehicular traffic. (1) Signs on Outdoor Machine , Device and Eauiowont. Signs located on, attac e o or a n e~""upan machines, devices and equipment locates or used outdoors which do not generally advertise the business where such machines, devices and equipment are used or located but do, in regard to such machines, devices or equipment, identify its trademark, ttadensse or manufacturer; ivo the name or cost of the product or service provided therefrom; or give the operating instructions therefor. PArr A 3F . Such machines, devices and egApwent shall include, but not be limited to coin-operated vending nachines, fuel dispensing pumps, telephone booths or facilities, auto- matic teller machines, automotive vacuum cleaners, and other similar self-service outdoor machines, devices or equipment. 4. Prohibited Signs. It shall be unlawful for any person to erect, construct, maintain, reconstruct, place, convert, locate or make use of or cause to be erected, constructed, maintained, reconstructed, placed, located or used, any of the following signs or advertising purposes: Signs on Private Property Without Consent of Owner. Signs ocat• on ppr vats property without the consent of the owner of acid premises. (b) Parkin end Maneuverln Arias. Signs which are located In or rater •res v a _L t a use of a required off-street parking space or maneuvering area. (c) Unsafe Signs. Signs which are, or become deteriorated, dilapidated or in danger of falling or otherwise unsafe. (d) Signs on Public Pro arty. Signs on, over, or within a pu c eteet, s ewe , alley, street lamp, utility pole, hydrant, tree, shrub, bridge, building or structure, traffic or street sign or device or other public property; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply tosprojecting signs in central business districts as speci-ica ly permitted in this Article or signs that are used to advertise annual community events for a temporary period of time for which the City Council has given its express consent. y (e) applicable Code Compliance. Signs of which building not cdcomply with e# elctrical ce, or other applicable code or ordinance of the City. (E) Trees and Shrubs. Signs located on trees and shrubs. (g) Motion Picture Signs. Signs which empluy a stereopticar, or motion Pictur• machine. (h) Si na Obscur;n or Interfarin With View. Signs oca a or um na e n suc a manner as to obscure or otherwise interface with the effectiveness of an official traffic sign, signal or devicet or so as to obstruct or interfere with the view of a driver of approaching, emerging or intersecting traffic or so as to prevent any traveler on asyy street from obtaining i clear view of approaching vehLulea for a distance of 250 feet along the street. (i) Proper Shieldin of Lighted, _S~ilosSigns containing or ma ng use or Ll g s w c are not effectively shielded as to prevent beams or rays of lights Eros being directed at any portion of the traveled way of a public street or which are of such intensity or brilliance, regardless of use, directions or shielding, sa as to PAGE I . likely impair or interfere with the vision of any driver of any motor vehicle upon a public street. Flashing, Blinkin or Traveling Lights. Any sign with as ng, n ng or trove ng lights except temporary Christmas lights or signs which have a moving message or which have automatically changing messages. 5. Administration and Enforcement. The Building Official shall enforce and administer the provisions of this Article. The Build- ing official or City Manager may delegate the duties and powers granted to and imposed upon the Building Official by this Article. B. PERMITS 1. Permit Required for Signs. It shall be unlawful for any person to place, locate, erect, construct, reconstruct, alter, maintain, or make use of any sign,. not exempt from regulation, without having first secured a written permit for such sign from the Building Official, except as otherwise provided in this Article. 2. Exceptions to Permit Requirement. The following types of regulated signs shall be exempt from the permit requirements of this Article, but must comply with all other applicable regulation of this Article: (a) Legally nonconforming signs as defined in this Article. (b) Hall signs, legal notices and building address numbers. (c) State or National Flags. (d) Signs painted on glass surfaces of windows or doors. (e) Portable Signs. (f) Stake Signs. 3. Application Procedure. The application for a sign permit shall be submitted oo such forms as the Building Official may prescribe and shall be accompanied by such information, drawings and descriptive data as required by the Building Official to insure proper regulation of such sign and to insure compliance with this Article. 4. Permit Fee. If the plans and specifications for such sign set forth in any application for a permit conform to all of the PAGE 8 '1=• f ' r requirements of this Article and any other ordinance or law applicable thereto, the Building Official shall, upon payment of the following fee, issue the appropriate permit: Effective Area of Sign (Sq. Ft.) Fee 0 to 50 $15.00 over 50 to 100 20,00 over 100 to 200 25.00 over 200 to 300 30.00 over 300 to 400 50.00 over 400 75.00 5. Duration of Permit. Unless otherwise revoked, all permits issued for signs shall be valid for an indefinite period of time, except as otherwise provided for in this Article. 6. Revocation of Permit, Appeals. The Building Official is hereby granted the power to revoke any and all sign permits for violation of any provision of this Article. Any permit holder wishing to appeal the decision and order of the Building Official revoking a sign permit, may appeal the same to the Board of Adjustment in accordance with the laws, ordinances, regulations and procedures governing other matters appealed to said Board. C. PORTABLE SIGNS 1. Regulations Applicable to all ?ortable Signs. In addition to all other applicable provisions, the following regulations shall apply to til portable signs in all zoning districts: (a) Flaahin Li hts Prohibited. No portable sign shall be use so as to make use o any flashing or intermittent lights on or in conjunction with such sign. (b) "i no Anchored. All portable signs used for advertise ng purposes, when not in transit, shall be securely anchored, so as to prevent overturning or unsafe move. ment, the sufficiency of such anchorage to be determined by the Buiidtng Official. (c) Maximum Stec. No portable sign shall be used for a Verteiv•s ng which is in excess of 72 square feet of effec area. 2. Number of On-Premise Portable Signs Limited. No person shall place, erect, maintain or make use of, at any one time, on PAGF, 0 `t' l f r` any one premise more than two (2) on-premise portable signs for purposes of advertising of an effective area of 25 square feet or less, or more than one (1) on-premise portable sign for purposes of advertising of an effective area of more than 25 square feet. 3. Regulation of Off-Premise Portable Signs. The following regulations shall apply to all off-premise portable signs used for advertising: (a) Number Limited. No persun shall erect, maintain or make use o more tan four off-premise portable signs at any one time to advertise, identify or otherwise give infor- mation relating to the business, activity, event, produLt or service, whether one or more, located on or at any one business, store or commercial establishment. (b) Spacing. No person shall place erect, make use of, or maintain an off-premise portable sign within 250 feet of another off-premise portable sign. In computing the spacing requirement, the measurement shall be made parallel to the nearest curb line and on the same side of the street. (c) Identification. The owner of an off•premise portable a gn s a cause each si;n to be conspicuously labeled or marked with the owner ■ name, address and telephone nuvber. (d) Register To Be Kept. Every sign owner placing, using or maintaining en o f-premise portable sign shall keep a current register or book showing the date or dates when, and location of the premises where such sign is placed or used. No person shall record or register a sign as being used on a date or dates or at a premise when such sign was not so used. Every person required to keep a current register or book shall make such register or book available to the Building Inspector for inspection, upon demand, at any reasonable time. D. REGULATtON OF SIGNS BY ZONING DISTRICTS The following regulations apply to specified signs in the specified zoning districts. 1. Residential Districts. The following regulations shall apply to signs in all residential zoning districts. (a) UP-prohibf, projecting, portable or off-premise signs ited. (b) Height. No sign shall have a greater height than 25 eat. (c) Size. No sign shall have an effective area greater tin SO square feet. (d) Setback. A11 ground signs shall maintain a minimum stance or setback from the curb line which is equal PAGE LO SPx ! Fg11 33 to or greater than one-half of the required front yard setback for the premise where the sign is located; provided however, that no ground signs shall be so located as to be withLn any public right-of-way. (a) Number. Only one ground sign shall be located on one prep se; except as follows: (1) Anicpremises fronting more then one public street, whh is not an allay, shall be allowed to make use of one ground sign on each separate street frontage. (2) Any premise which has more than 100 feet of public street frontage on any one public street (excluding alleys) may make use of one additional ground sign for each additional 100 feet of frontage, or fraction thereof. 2. Non-Residential Districts. The following regulations shall apply to signs in non-residential zoning districts: I (a) Type. All types of signs are permitted. (b) Height. No sign, which is not a roof sign, shall have a e g t greater than 40 feet, except for signs located along Interstate 3S as permitted by G. 3 of this Article. (c) Size. No sign shall have an effective area greater than CM-square feet, except for signs located along Inter- state 35 as permitted by G. 3 of this Article. (d) Setback. (1) All ground, portable, stake and projecting signs shall maintain a minimum distance or setback from the curb line, as determined by height and effective area, in accordance with the following: 4&- Minimum Setback Ut) 3n 30 30 30 Height (ft.) 2n_ 20 20 30 10 20 30 0 SO 150 400 Effective Area (Sq.Ft.) (2) All ground signs, in addition to meeting the required setback requirement, shall be so located as not to be withLn any public right-of-way. (3) In determining the required setback the measurement of the height or effective area of the sign which would require the greatest setback shall be used; provided, however, that, if the determiningg height separates effective differentr setbacks ea dins, on quiramenta, [the least restrictive setback shall be used. (a) Number. Only one ground sign, or supporting structure [Tie of, shall be located on any one premise, except as follows$ PAGE 11 1 • (1) Any premises fronting more than one public street, which is not an alley, shall be allowed to make use of one ground sign for each separate street frontage. (2) Any premise which has more than 100 feet of public street frontage on any one street (excluding alleys) may make use of one additional ground sign for each additional 100 feet of frontage, or fraction thereof. (3) Where any premise contains more than one lawfully per- mitted business or use to divided buildings, each business or use thereon shall be allowed one or more on-premise signs on the permitted supporting structures thereon. 3. Planned Development District. All signs located in a Planned Development District shall comply with all provisions of this Article including any provision that would have been applicable to the property on which the sign is located had the property been otherwise toned as a residential or non-residential zoning districts in accordance with the uses shown on the approved site plan for such Planned Development; provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may vary in the planned development ordinance for said premises, any of the sign requirements of this Article as such requirements would apply to signs in Planned Development Districts. 4. Central Business Districts. The following regulations shall apply to signs in Central Business Zoning Districts. (a) Right-of-War Limitation on Pro actin St ns. No projec- ting sign shall project or ex ten nto t s public right- of-way for a distance of more than 10 feet or within 2 feet of the nearest curb line, whichever is more restric- tive. No projecting sign, supporting structure, or part thereof which extends into the public right-of-way shall occupy any of the space between the ground level and 8 feat above said ground level in said right-of-way. (b) Site. No sign shall have an effective area greater than 4W are feet. (c) Limitations. No ground sign or supportingg structure thereof shall have a height greater then 40 feet. E. REGULATION OF ATTACHED SIGNS In addition to any other applicable regulations, the following regulations shall apply to the type of sign specified in all zoning districts. PACE 12 1r f ~ ,fir, ri 1. Roof Signs. (a) Pro ec,ion. Roof signs, or the supporting structure thereof, shall not extend laterally beyond the exterior walls, or upward beyond the highest point of the roof of the building on which it is located, to a height, as measured from ground level to the highest part of the roof, which is greater than specified below as follows: Number of Stories Maximum Height One 55% of bldg. height Two 36% of bldg. height Three to five 30% of bldg. height Six to nine 25% of bldg. height Ten to fifteen 23% of bldg. height Sixteen or more 40 feet 2. Pro ecr.ing Suns. (a) Construction. All projecting signs shall be securely attached to the building or structure. (b) Projection beyond Roof. A projecting sign shall not be erects on c e waitof any building so as to project above the roof or parapet wall or above the roof level where there is no parapet wall; except a sign erected at a right angle to the building, which does not extend 18 inches beyond the wall, may be erected to a height not exceeding 2 feet above the roof or parapet will or above the roof level where there is no parapet wail. A sign attached to a corner of a building and parallel to the vertical line of such corner, shall be deemed to be erected at a right angle to the building wall. (c) Size. The total square footage of all projecting signs a7iaTl not exceed twenty percent (20x) of the wail area on which such signs are located. 3. Nall Sign~sLLaitation on Size. The total square footage o a wwali ids shall not exceed twenty percent (20X) of the wall area on which such signs are located. 4. Signs on Common Buildings. When one or more attached signs are oca a on e u ng which is divided and contains more than one business or use, the regulation of such attached signs specified herein, as to else and projection, shall apply separately to the part of the exterior walls which contain that business or use. F. REMOVAL OF ABANDONED OR UNLAWFUL SIGNS 1. Removal of Aband.med Signs. All abandoned signs, and thei: supporting structures which are not buildings, shall be removed within thirty (30) days froo the date of abandonment by the owner of the premises on which such sign is located. Any sign, and its PAGE 13 T'1 .,t 'y~ vj t supporting structure which is not a building, which is an abandoned sign on the effective date of this ordinance, shall be removed within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this ordinance. 2. Extension of Time To Use. The owner or lessee of the premises on which an abandoned sign is located, who desires to use such sign, or supporting structure, may within sixty (60) days of the abandonment or effective date of this ordinance, make appli- cation to the Building Official for an extension of time to make use of such sign. If the sign or supporting structure conforms to all requirements of the law and the applicant submits reasonable evidence that he is endeavoring to. make use of such sign in a lawful manner the Building Official may grant an extension of time up to a maximum of twelve (12) months for the owner or lessee to make use of the sign. The Building Official may, a condition of granting such extension, require that the owner or lessee paint out, obscure, cover, or remove some or all of the elements or message or face portion of the sign in such manner as to leave the sign and supporting structure neat and unobtrusive in appearance or in harmony with the adjacent buildings to which it is located or attached. 3. Procedure for Removal of Abandoned or Unlawful Signs. Any abandoned sign for which an extension of time to use has not been granted, or any unlawful sign or supporting structure thereof, is hereby declared a public nuisance and may be removed in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. (a) Notice and Order. The Building Official shall deliver or sen a wr Ittea notice to the owner of the abandoned or unlawful sign or premises where such sign is located ordering the removal of such sign and its supporting struture within ten (10) days of deliv,ry or mailing of the notice and order. For purposo,, of this provision, the name of the person listed by the City Tax Assessor/Collector or other local taxing jurisdiction for tax purposes as the owner of the premises where such abandoned or unlawful sign is located shall be presumed to be the owner of such property or the agent for such ovner and notice mailed or delivered to said porson at the address listed shall be presumed to be sufficient. PACE 14 I (b) Removal; Appeals. If the person ordered to remove said sign fails to do so within the time specified, the Building Official may, after twenty (20) days of the date of delivery or mailing of the notice and order, remove or cause said sign to be removed; provided, however, that any person aggrieved by said order may file an appeal with the Board of Adjustment in accordance with the provisions .applicable for other appeals from decisions of the Building Official. In case such appeal is timely filed, the procedures applicable to other appeals shall be followed and the order of the Building official may be stayed in accordance thereof, pending the final determination of tha Board of Adjustment. (c) Im oundaent of Si nt• Redemption, Disposal. Any sign v c a remove y t hi Building Official pursuant to these provisions shall be impounded and transported r•, and stored by the Building Official at a locat'.on designated for such purpose. Records of where ouch signs were located and when removed shall be kepP. The Building Official shall send a letter to the owner of such sign, if known, or if not known, to W. owner or person in control of the premises where •jch sign is located, giving notice of such impoundmen•. The Building Official shall hold t-.# sign in storage for at least thirty (30) days afte. notice of Impound- ment has been mailed. Any r,rtablc sign may be redeemed by the owner thereof ,ion the pa -nc;tt of a fee to the City of Denton of a r,tal of $23. 0 for hauling the same to storage, plus $1.00 per day storage fee. Any nonportable sign c.y be redeemed by the owner thereof upon payment of the cost of removal of and hauling the same storage, as determined by the Building Official plus per day storage fee. Any sign not reclaimed by the owner thereof within thirty (30% days of the mailing of the notice of impoundmv%c may be disposed of in accordance with applicr',le law. (d) Reeaver of Costs. If, upon disposal of an unredeemed "Aporta e a gn, the Building Official has not received an amount sufficient to cover the coat of removal and hauling of such removed sign, the Building Official shall send notice to the owner of the premises where such sign was located, requesting payment of the removal and hauling costs, less any amount received in disposal of such sign. Any such coats remaining unpaid after thirty (30) days from the date of mailing of notice shall become delinquent and shall bear interest at ten (10x) percent per annum. The Building Official may cause such unpaid and delinquent amount to be assessed against the premises where such removed sign was located by filing and perfecting ■ lien against said premises. The cost levied against said premises shall include a $50.00 administration fee. (e) A~pp ogl~~of Cost ~Impo~e__dl Levied. Any person may contest t a isons anesi of t" no cost for the removal of a sign imposed hareunder by filing an appeal with the Board of Adjustment withia twenty (20) days of the mailing of the notice of such costs. The Board of PAGE 15 Y, I F Adjustment may either uphold the cost imposed by the Building Official or impose and cause to be levied whatever cost it considers to be reasonable. Storage costs imposed hereunder shall not be appealable. G. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. ;fanner of Measurement. (a) Setback. To apply the setback provision of this Article or s gns at any one point, the following measuring procedure shall be used: (1) Draw an imaginary vertical line extending upward from the curb line of the premises; (2) Beginning at any point on the vertical line draw an imaginary horizontal line perpendicular to the vertical line and curb line and extending toward the premises; (3) Beginning at the point where the vertical line intersects the horizontal line, measure along the horizontal line for the required setback. (See Appendix Illustration 14a) (b) Hai ht. To apply the applicable height limitations of t To rticle at an one point for signs, or supporting structures thereof, which are not roof signs, the following measuring procedure shall be used: (1) Draw an imaginary vertical line extending upward from the nearest curb line of the public street fronting the premises; (2) Beginning at the surface level of the curb line measure along the vertical line to a point which is the maximum allowed height for a particular sign or supporting structure; (3) From that point draw an imaginary horizontal line perpendicular to the vertical line towards the premises; (4) This extended horizontal line gives the maximum height allowed at that location for a particular sign or suppo;ting structure. (See Appendix Illustration 1144 (c) Effective Area. la determining the effective area of a sign where more than one sign is located or affixed to a single supporting structure, all signs located there- on or affixed thereto shall be included and measured together as though they were one sign. 2. Setback Clearance Zo&e. In all zoning districts, except Central Business Districts, all ground signs shall be so located to that no part of the effective area of such sign shall occupy the space, (as determined in the same manner for measuring height and setback for signs), between 2 and 10 feet in height within 15 feet PAGE 16 of the curb line of any public street. (See Appendix Illustration 14c). The supporting structure of sich sign may occupy such space to an extent no greeter than 2 square feet in area, such area to be determined in the same manner as for effective area of signs. 3. Signs on Certain Highways. (a) The provisions of this Article shall apply to all signs alongg the interstate or Primary System of highways within the City to the extent that such provisions are not in conflict with the Federal Highway Beautification Act, (23 U.S-C-A-, Sec. 131, at aaq), including all amendments thereto, or Article IV ("Highway Beautification") of the Litter Abatement Act (Article 4477-9a, Texas Revised Civil Statutes) including all amendments thereto or any regulation made pursuant to such Acts by governmental agencies. (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article, on-premise ground signs in non-residential roninA distrints which are located within the "controlled area along Interstate Highway 35 (and 35E and V) regulated by the foregoing federal or state laws or regulations, may, if not prohibited thereby, be constructed to a maximum height of 60 feet and a maximum effective area of 672 square feet. The Building Official may require, prior to issuance of a permit for such sign, a certificate from a licensed engineer certifying that the proposed sign is so designed to be in compliance with the wind or other design rc•{uirements of the Uniform Building Code. (c) All sign permits issued by the Building Official pursuant to this Article shall contain a notice advising the permittee that signs located along the Interstate or Primary System of highways may be regulated by federal or state law or regulations anti a permit may be required from another governmental agency. 4. Clearance from Electrical Linea. Signs shall be located a minimum distance of 6 feet measured horizontally and 12 feat measured vertically from overhead electrical conductors which are energized in excess of 750 volts. The term "overhead conductors" as used herein means any electrical conductor, either base or insulated, installed above the ground. 5. Temporary and Political Signs. (a) Teriporarl real estate sales and development temporary politica, occasional sales and other specia{ use signs which are used for, or relate to, a particular purpose or event shall be removed by the owner of the promise on which they are located after ten (10) days of the date of the accomplishment of the purpcae for which they are i PACE 17 used or the occurrence of the event to which they refer or relate. (b) In the case of temporary political s! ns, the candidate to which a sign refers, if not placed on a premise by the owner of the premise thereof, shall be responsible for the removal for such signs within the time specified above. (c) Stake or portable signs which relate to a cardidate or issue to be voted upon by a political party or at a public election and are 32 square feet or less in effective area may be erected wtchout limit as to number; provided, that such signs comply with all other applicable requirements of this Article. 6. Sian Maintenance. All signs and supporting structures shall tie kept in good repair, condition and appearance. All faces, bolts, supporting frames and fastenings shall be free from deterioration, insc,:t or rodent infestation, rot or loosening. Painted signs which are faded or obscured because of weather or time shall be repainted or redone or painted over so as to be neat in appearance. 7. Identification of Signs. Every off-premise sign shall be plainly narked at all times, in a locatinn so as to be conspicuous and easily identifiable, with the current name, address and tele- phone -,umber of the owner or lessee cf the sign. H. NONCONFORMI4NG SIGNS 1. Applicability. The provisions of this Article, defining and regulating nonconforming signs, shall control over sty other con- flicting provision of Appendix D-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. 2. Defined. A sign, including its supporting structure, shall be considered nonconforming when it does not conform to all or part of the provisions of this Article applicable thereto, is not a portable sign or stake sign, and: (a) was in existence and lawfully located and l:eed on the r effective date of this Article, or; (b) was in existence and lawfully located and used in accordance with the provisions of the prior ordinance applicable thereto, or which was considered legally nonconforming thereunder, and has since been in continuous or regular ase; or (c) was in existence, located, and used on the property at the time thw property was annexed to the City of Denton and has since been in regular and continuous use. PAU 16 3. Destruction; Repair. (a) Any nonconforming sign, including its supporting structure, which is destroyed, damaged, dilapidated or deteriorated shall not be replaced, repaired, or renovated, in whole or in part, if such replacement, repair or renovation would require an expenditure of monies in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the repro- duction cost of a new sign, including its supporting structure, which is substantially the same or similar to the nonconforming sign destroyed, damaged, dilapidated or deteriorated. (b) The Building Official may, whenever he deems necessary to reasonably determine the applicability of the fore- going provision, require the owner of said non-conforming sign to submit two or more independent estimates from established sign companies of the cost of replacing, re- pairing or renovating, in whole or in part, the existing nonconforming sign and two or more independent estimates from established sign companies of the reproduction cost of a new sign, including its supporting structure, which is substantially the same or similar to the nonconforming sign destroyed, damaged, dilapidated or deteriorated. (c) No sign or supporting structure which is lawfully reproduced, repaired, or renovated as a nonconforming sign shall be increased in effective area or height. 4. Termination: Time Period. All legally nonconforming signs, including supporting structures, shall be removed or modified so as to comply with the provisions of this article on or before January 11 1995 or within tsn (10) years of the date the sign became nonconforming, whichever is later. 5. Appeals from Termination Period. The owner of any noncon- forming sign may appeal the termination time specified for such sign I to the Board of Adjustment. Appeal procedures, unless otherwise specified herein, shall be those as used in other matters appealad to the Board of Adjustment. (a) Time for Filing Appeals. The owner of any nonconforming s goo w s.esT~ to appeal the termination date applicable co such owners sign shall file his a peal with the Board of Adjustment within one (1) year of the effective date of this ordinance or within one (1) year of when the premises on which a nonconforming sign is located is annexed to the City. Failure to file such appeal within the time specified constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal or contest the termination date applicable to such nonconforming sign. (b) Hearin Appeals. The Board of Adjustment may, in its discretion, ear all properly filed appeals after the one (1) year period for filint has passed and set all appeals to be heard at one or sore tiaea as is convenient for such Boards PATE 19 (c) Decermination. The Board of Adjustment, in case of appeal- or'-the applicable termination data, shall detereinewhether the termination date applicable to appellant's sign has allowed sufficient time for the appellant to recover his, capital investment in the nonconforming sign. In making such do term in._cion, the Board may consider the amount of the initial capital investment, life expectancy of the investment, the removal cost to comply with these regulations and any other factor the Board believes to be pertinent to the determination. The amortization period appealed from shall be calculated or measured from the beginning of the amortization period; i.e. the date the sign becomes nonconforming. (d) Lxtenslon of Smortization Period. If the board atetm HHai t a e arm na on ate, as applied to appellant's nonconforming sign does not afford sufficient time to allow appellant to recoup his investment in such sign, the Board may grant, by its order, an extension of time to a date specified so that such sign may be maintained as a nonconforming sign until such specified date. 6. Relocation of Nonconforming Signs. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article, any sign which is a legally existing non- conforming sign hereunder may be relocated on the same lot or tract of lend, if the sign is required to be removed from its present location because of the acquisition of the property upon which the sign is located by any governmental agency or other entity which did or could have acquired the property through the exercise of its power of eminrekt domain. Such relocated sign shall be placed, insofar as possible, as to comply with all the provisions of this Article. The termination period specified herein shall not be extended because of such relocation. 7. Signs Located on Nonconforming Premises. Nhera, on the effective date of this ordinance, a sign is located on a premise which is a legally nonconforming use of the premise and su%;.i sign is used in regard thereto, the sign may be used and maintained thereon, even though it would not be a permitted use, so long as such premise is continually used as a lawful nonconforming use; provided, howsver, if such sign is nonconforming as to height, area, or setback, such sign shall, after the termination period allowed herein, be brought in conformity with such requirements applicable to the zoning district in which such sign is located, PACE 20 t viq r 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED 1. The Board of Adjustment may grant a special exception from the provisions of this Article for the setback or height of a nonporrible sign under the following circumstances: (a) Visibility Obstructions. When fifty percent (301) or more o tective area of such sign as located or to be located in accordance with the setback or height requirements of this Article cannot or would t,nt be visible from at least one "visibility point" because of the location of a building or structure constructed or erected prior to the effective date of this ordinance. For the purposes of this provision, "visibility ?pint" shall mean the viewing locations, at a height of 6 feet above the general surface level, determined by extending the required side yard setback lines of the premise on which such sign is located or to be located so as to intersect the curb line of the public street fronting said premise; than measuring from said intersection points along the curb line in the direction of the nearest side lot line of said lot for a distance of 100 feet. If the street fronting said premise allows traff is flow in only one direction, the visibility point located along the curb line in the direction from which traffic approaches said premise shall be used to deteraine the viisibility eequirement herein. (See Appendix Illustra- tion No. M.od). (b) Medical Emergency Sips. When a sign located on the premise o an emergency medical treatment facility would, because of the setback or height requirements of this Article, not be readily visible from adjacent public streets. For purposes of this provision, "Emergency Medical Treatment Facility" shatl mean any hospital, clinic or other facility where medical aid is offered to a person or animal who suffers An unexpected injury or illness which requires immediate medical attention. 1. In granting special exceptions allowed herein, the Board of Adjustment shall specify, by written order, the particular setback or the particular height that will be allowed And in doing so shall not allow deviation from the provisions of this Article beyond what is minimally necessary to remedy the situation allowing for said special exception. J. HISTCRUL LANDMARK SIGNS The provisions of this Article el,tll not apply insofar as they confict with any provision applicable to a sign designated as a historical landmark pursuant to the provisions of Article 28A of Appendix s-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Taxes. The provisions of this Article applicable to the termination PAnr. 21 I A•. f G y 1• ~°f of nonconforming signs shall not apply to any sign designated as an historical landmark or structure. K. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS The definitions and provisions of this Article applicable to signs shall control over any other conflicting definition or provision found in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION III. That the Appendix Illustrations of, Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the Uty of Denton are hereby amended by adding the following illustrationr: PACE 22 14. SIGNS 14a. Measurement of Setback. 5 NrNI cwb line SIGN 1 cry I k+i ~ •t,'.i o 4` fix. i.•• ,~'.i ~ n.x ~ 'nlo x M1 14C. Setback Clearance lone 40 . 400 Myatt feet 30 100 s I sa. et. ~ f i 30 •a, ft i . ~ se+baek In hat 20 Is x: ro - ~°111 su wA W.. ~1tNt rcz:zcwb lint 14d. Vii+ibility Point Vlsim11ty paird aG Setback / cCIO, "opi / Street 10~ `1/ \ VlaidNty point PAGE 24 i i • SECTION IV. That the definitions of various type signs of Article 12 (51) through (59.1) of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton are hereby repealed in their entirety; said numbering to be reserved for future use. SECTION V. That Article 19 C of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton relating to special development signs is here- by repealed in its entirety; said paragraph C to be reserved for future use. SECTION VI. That Article 27 (52) of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordi- nances of the City of Denton defining "sign" is hereby repealed in its entirety; said number reserved for future use. SECTION VII. That Section 5-4 of Article i of Chapter 5 of the Code of Ordi- nances of the City of Denton relating to permits for signs is hereby repealed in its entirety, said section number to be reserved for future use. SECTION VIII. That "I, Sign and Identification Uses" of Article 7 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is repealed in its entirety. SECTION IX. Any person who shall erect, construct, locate, place, maintain, keep or make use of any sign in violation of any provisions of t'.is ordinance or otherwise violate a provision of this ordinance, v. who fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements t.tereof, • or of a permit issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a m'sdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollar, ($200.00). Each such person shall be deemed g•;ilty of a saparatj offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which tay violation of this ordinance is coamitted, or continued, and r,oon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punishrd within ths limits above. PAGE 25 SECTION X. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof ter any person or circumstance is held invslid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the v~lLdity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION XI. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the pro- visions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such ,onflict. SECTION XII. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage; provided, however, that the provisions of this ordinance relating to the spacing of off-premise portable signs shall not apply to such existing signs located and contin- uously used at one site on the effective date of this ordinance, until sixty days after the effective date of this ordinance; and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985. RICHARD 0. STEWTj R CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST! ' AWLUTTZ ALLENg CITY 3LCRTTERY CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS JOE RDYENOUtSl ACTLEGAL FORMi ING CITY ATTORNEY CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS DYt PAGE 26 f.o 'T J; Ilk N P 6 2 Minutes May 30, 1984 Page Eight inappropriate to act on a replat that involves lots less than an acre in size in an agricultural (A) zoning dis- trict however, staff dil feel that some action should be initiated on this matter for the benefit of the lot owner(s) in need of some decision or indication of how things may progress while building permits are being I withheld. Staff also feels that the need for rezoning, resubdividing and consideration of variances would not have developed if the petitioner had not disregarded the formal process, however, single family (SF-16) zoning as currently proposed will probably have little negative impact on the existing character of the subdivision, and staff recommends approval of 2-1-564. Chair declared public hearing closed. Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of 2-1664. Seconded by Mr. Escue and passed unanimously (6-0). E. Approval of the prellminary replat of lots 3, 4 and 5, block A, of the Lincoln Park Addition. Ms. Spivey stated 39 reply forms were mailed to property owners within 200 feet of subject property; 1 was re- turned in favor and 1 in opposition, and 23 courtesy notices were mailed to adjacent property owners. She stated this .38 acre tract is located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Place and Chambers Street. The pro- perty is toned single family (SF-7) and single family development is anticipated, The intent of the replat is to create two 75' lots where three SO' lots now exist. i Water, sewer, gas, electric, telephone, streets, and drainage facilities are in place and staff recommends approval. Mr. Billy Redmon stated his intent is to make larger lots. So one spoke in opposition. Chair declared public hearing closed. Mr. Escue made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary replat of lots 3, 4, and 5, block A, of the Lincoln Park Addition. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unani- mously carried (6.0). IV. Considerations A. consider making a recommendation to the City Council concerning the proposed sign ordinance. On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Watkins explained the sign ordinance, set backs and restrictions. He requested that a historical sign not be restricted to this ordinance. He stated in a survey done in 1991, 8 out of 1S Texas communities surveyed, prohibited port- able signs. He stated the ordinance is basically con- servative. Mr. Juren stated as sophisticated a town as Denton is, we need an ordinance. j Mt. Juren made a motion to recommend the ppropposed sign ordinance to the City Council, Seconded by Mr. Sidor Land unanimously carried (6.0). I CITY COUNCIL. QRanar JORMAT DATE: 03/05/85 TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council 0 F FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPICON OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE DATE, TIME, AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING THE PETITION OF THE CITY OF DENTON FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 136.58 ACRES BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY $00 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF US HWY 377 AND SOUTH OF BRUSH CREEK ROAD (A-11) RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning commission will make its recommendation at its meeting of March 13, 1985. Staff recommends that public hearings be held on March 19 and April 2. S RY: Utility service to this area is a major question mark. Electric service is available from both the City of Denton and TP&L. Water service must be planned in conjunction with the City of Argyle because it to is in a dual service area and extending City of Denton mains is not a feasible alternative. Sewer service is to be provided by the City of Denton. The Development Review Committee has reviewed a preliminary plat of the proposed Woodcreek subdivision and has with- held a recommendation of approval pending approval of the Argyle Water Co. for sale of water. BACKGROUND: nn July 3, 1984, the Planning and Community Development Department reported plans for a proposed 172 acre development consisting of predominately single family housing, townhouses, six acres of com- mercial, and approximately three acres of retail and multi-family. The site is located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction and the City Council directed staff to begin the annexation process. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Police, Fire and Sanitation Departments will have to provide immediate services upon annexation. yISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Res Lout; G. Chris Hartung Prepared~gby: City Manager David Ellison Senior Planner App ve • Jeff Mega Director of Planning and Community Development 10578 10101, NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. On the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the city iro`uncil Cham ersof th~iunicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below. On the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the CityZouncil Chambers o the Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold ■ public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard or, the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of tl'e foliowing described property, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land Lying and beirg situated in the CQvsity of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the George W. Daugherty Survey, Abstract No. 3510 H. Haggood Survey, Abstract No. 517 and the W. Hudson Survey, Abstract No. 586 and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by ordinance No. 69.40, Tract III, said point lying 500 feet cast of and perpendicular to the centerline of U. S. Highway No. 377 and in the north boundary line of the George W. Daugherty Survey, Abstract No. 351 and the south boundary line of the James Severe Survey, Abstract No. 1164, said point also lying in an east and west county road known as Brush Creek Road; THENCE north 49°41'40" east along said survey lines and in said county road, a distance of 1624.94 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0633'13" west a distance of 805 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 89*15'26" west a distance of 163.8 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°51'55" east a distance of 394.5 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 2°59'1;" west a distance+of 919.7 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 89°38'13" west a distance of 1452.9 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°13'18" west a distance of 1032.26 feet to a point for a corner; A-11/HOODCREEK (37; SOUTH)/PACE ONE Nli • THENCE south 79°08'04" west a distance of 1789.01 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the present city limits ►ine as established by Ordinance No. 69-40 Tract III, said point also being 500 feet east of and perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Hwy. 377; THENCE north 27°28' east along said present city limits, 500 feet east of and parallel to the centerline of said highway, a distance of 3907.86 feet to the place of beginning and containing 136.58 acres of land, more or less. SECTION II. The Ka* tror of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspaper hiving general circulation in the City and in the above described territory not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all ins accordance with the Munici al Annexation Act (Article 910x, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full farce and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985. RICRARn 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETM CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY (:F DENTON, TEXAS BY: tiw A-11/WOODCR£EK (377 SOUTH)/PAGE Two 1010L ` NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of t.ie George W. Daugherty Survey, Abstract No, 351, H. Haggood Survey, Abstract No. 517 and the W. Hudson Survey, Abstract No. 586 and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 69-40, Tract III0 said point lying 500 feet east of and perpendicular to the centerline of U. S. Highway No. 377 and in the north boundary line of the George W. Daugherty Survey, Abstract No. 351 and the south boundary line of the James Severe Survey, Abstract No. 1164, said point also lying in an east and west county road known as Brush Creek Road; THENCE north 89°41'40" east along said survey lines and in said county road, a distance of 1624.94 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°33'13" vest a distan.a of 805 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 89°15'26" west a distance of 163.8 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°51'55" east a distance of 394.5 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 2°59'17" west a distance of 919.7 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 89°38'1:," west a distance of 1452.9 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°13'18" west a distance of 1032.26 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 79°08'04" west a distance of 1789.01 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the present city limits line as established by JrAinance No. 69-40 Tract III, said point also being 500 feet east of and perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Hwy. 377; THENCE north 27°26' east along said present city limits, 500 feet east of and parallel to the centerline of said highway, a distance of 3907.86 fee- to the place of beginning and containing 136.58 acres of land, more or less. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. H. in the C ti-y~ouncil Chain ers o the' Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A-11/?OODCREEK (377 SOUTH)/PAGE ONE "i l'C MZ ! tt 4 4 J :'A A' _ J !.l ] v5 f :.~;1 J P4 1. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti y council Chambers o t e Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. RICHARD 0. MAYOR CITY OF PENTON, TEI(AS ATTEST: A•11/WOODCREEK (377 SOUTH)/PACE TWO ~r ri rhj ~r,~ , / ~ _ K,'- 'i ~ ~ r ~ i~:. _ J' \ / ww - ~ \ / ~M~~~ ti ~ ` , . , ~ r ~ . ~ II ~ ~ ~f ~ _ _ ~ p ~ ri t' t i; i' i , •w.r~r.r~~~ ty Yew: J.-iTtia .a V'71 ~.~L `~Tr N 1 r . . ~.w1i.. . J . • . y „ _ i I J i ~ i i ~ 1 ~ ry ~ . r r r ir~ -.iV.__._...~. ~ a x ` 1. N. 7 Al S p ~21 4i A- l t±+' ANNEXATION SCHEDULE February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 05, 1985 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing March 06, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March 11, 1985 Submit agenda item March 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 18, 1985 City Council holds public hearing March 20, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout Marc:i 25, 1985 Submit agenda item March :61 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 02, 1985 City Council nolds public hearing April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item April 16, 1935 Submit agenda back--up *April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City Council to institute annexation proceedings April 250 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance May 271 1985 Submit agenda item May 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *June 04, 1985 Final action by City Council *Denotes action by the City Council 0964g I p~ aSP~ C.'a i P ri'.., DATE: 03/05/85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 49-6 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE DATE, TIME, AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING THE PETITION OF THE CITY OF DENTON FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 93.67 ACPES BEGINNING 350 FEET SOUTH OF AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTER LINE OF US HWY 380 AND EAST OF GEESLING ROAD (CAPRICORN MOBILE HOME PARK AND SURROUND- ING PROPERTY) (A-13) RECOMMENDATION: I The Planning and Zoning Commission will make its recommendation at its meeting of March 13, 1985. Staff recommends that public hearings be held on March 19 and April 2. SUMMARY: The Holigan Development Corporation has proposed expansion and improvement of the existing Capricorn Mobile Home Park, The existing mobile home park is situated on approximatly 30 acres and an additional 63+ acres is proposed for mobile home land use (approximately 6-7 units per acre projected). Upgraded utility service to the existing mobile home park is a potential plus of the proposal. Continuation of the pattern of concentrating manufactured/mobile home park land use in east Denton is major policy question. A trip of the existing park and property along 380 frontage is already in the city limits. BACKGROUND: A preliminary plat of the existing and proposed expansion area has been submitted for review by the Development Review Commit- tee. The City Council issued a directive to staff to initiate the annexation process at it;; meeting of December 18, 1984. The Planning and Zoning Commission, Public Utilities Board, and City Council approved a request for extension of City water to the site. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Building Inspection, Solid Waste, Police and Fire would have to provide services immediately upon annexation. There are approxi- mately 150 residents at Capricorn Mobile Home park. Projected population if ultimate development is approved as proposed is 1,62 FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined A-13 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Respa.c i ted: • 33//~~LL Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: ,404 David Ellison Senior Planner Aproe e e jr Director of Planning and Community Development I 10548 I I I l l 4 F i A yJ 4 ry4 1. Vi :.r 1 ai l 10131. NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City uncil Cham ers o t e unicipai Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below. On the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in :he City-Council Chambers othe Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, and more particularly described as follows: Tract I: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as es teed in Ordinance No. 69-40, Tract V, said point lying 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the center line of U. S. 390 and in the east boundary line of Lot 4, Block A of the subdivision of said Forrest Survey, same being the oast boundary line of a tract conveyed to FSCS Company by deed recorded in Voluue 1099, Page 923 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE south 1°40' west, along the east boundary line of said lot and tract, a distance of 339.51 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said lot and tract; THENCE north 87°07'30" west, along the south boundary line of said lot and tract, a distance of 545.26 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of said tract; THENCE north 1°03'40" west, along the west boundary line of said tract, a distance of 227.9 feet to a point for a corner in the said city limits; THENCE north 81°26' east, along said city limits, 350 feet soc,_h of and perpendicular to the center line of said U.S. 380, a distance of 564.97 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3.59 acres of land, more or leas. Tract II: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of a tract of land con-` v~ eyerT to FSCS Co. by deed recorded in Volume 1197, Page 564 of the deed records of Denton County, Texas, same being the northwest corner of Lot 10, Block A of the subdivision of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, said point also lying in the east line of a north and south county road known as Geeslin$ Road; A-13/CAPRICORN MPH//PACE ONE r, a ~ S • THENCE north 87°04'15" east, along the north boundary line of said tract and lot, passing the southwest corner of the above described Tract 1, a distance of 1485.18 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 86°56'59" east, continuing along said lines, a distance of 1379.92 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northeast corner of said FSCS Co. tract and Lot 11, Block A of said subdivision; THENCE south 2°53'35" east along the east boundary line of said FSCS tract and Lot 11, a distance of 379.39 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said FSCS tract; THENCE south 86°59'04" west along the south boundary line of said FSCS tract, a distance of 2527.35 feet to a point; THENCE south 87°18'40" west, continuing along said south boundary line, a distance of 338.60 feet to a point for a corner, -tame being the southwest corner of said FSCS tract and in the east line of said county road; THENCE north 2°45'51" west along the west boundary line of said FSCS tract and the east line of said county road, a distance of 379.69 feet to the place of beginning and containing 24.96 acrer of land, more or less. Tract 111. BEGINNING of the northwest corner of a tract of land conv` eyed-to James H. Russell, Jr. by deed recorded in Volume 578, Page 515 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, same being the southwest corner of the above described Tract II, said point also lying in the east line of a north and south county road known as Ceesling Road; THENCE south 89°32'49" east along the north boundary line of said Russell tract, same being the south boundary line of the above described Tract I1, a distance of 338.12 feet to a point; THENCE south 89°50'58" east, continuing along said lines, a distance of 2526.83 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said above described Tract II; THENCE south 0°17'13" east, a distance of 663.40 feet to a point for a corner; THE:'CE south 89°56'21" west, a distance of 712.0 fE2t to a point for a corner; THENCE north 89°24'39" west, a distance of 728.48 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°07'52" east, a distance of 985.11 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the north line of the east and west county road known as Blagg Road; i THENCE north 89°54'30" west along the north line of Blagg Road, a distance of 719.56 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 0°05'30" east, a distance of 365 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 89°54'30" west, a distance of 36.28 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 46°13'49" east, a distance of 45.10 feat to a point for a corner; A-13/CAPRICORN MPH//PACE TWO r wr <Y f 3 ,~T a, , 96.• r. ii •.'q y ' :i, f. e r'. THENCE south 89°59'49" west, a distance of 549.5 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 40°21'41" west, a distance of 255.8 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the east line of Ceesling Road; and the west boundary line of said Russell tract; THENCE north 0°00'11" west, along the west boundary line of said Russell tract and east line of Ceesling Road, a distance of 1459.04 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 89°54'18" east, a distance of 337.0 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 0055'15" east, a distance of 538.17 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 89°27'34" west, a distance of 337 feet to a point for a corner in the east line of said Ceesling Road; THENCE north 0°30'22" west, along the east line of Geesling Rcad, a distance of 59.37 feet to the place of beginning and containing 65.12 acres of land, more or less. SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the above described territory not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 970x, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect imnedistely folluwing its passage and approval. PASSEu AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985. RICHARD 0. a , KAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED As TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTOR .'t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: A•13/CAPRICORN MPH//PACE THREE wE r " 'S,; I y[q~ ' y a~ r i y, u ~3~;j' ~ 'x o,• 1013L NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, and more particularly described as follows: Tract I: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as escribed in Ordinance No. 69-40, Tract V, as id point lying 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the center line of U. S. 380 and in the east boundary line of Lot 4, Block A of the subdivision of said Forrest Survey, same being the east !--,undary line of a tract conveyed to FSCS Company by deed recorded in Volume 1099, Page 923 of the Dee! Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE south 1°40' west, along the east boundary line of said lot and tract, a distance of 339.51 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said lot and tract; THENCE north 87°07'30" west, along the south boundary line of said lot and tract, a distance of 545.26 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of said tract; THENCE north 1°03'40" west, along the west boundary line of said tract, a distance of 227.9 feet to a po:at for a corner in the said city limits; THENCE north 81°26' east, along said city limits, 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the center line of said U.S. 380, a distance of 564.97 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3.59 acres of land, more or less. Tract II: 6EGINNING at the northwest corner of a tract of land conveyye tv FSCS Co. by deed recorded in Volume 1197, Page 564 of the deed records of Denton County, Texas, same being the northwest corner of Lot 10, Block A of the subdivision of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, said point also lying in the east line of a north and south county road known as Geesling Road; THENCE north 87°04'15" east, along the north boundary line of said tract and lot, passing the southwest corner of the above described Tract 1, a distance of 1485.18 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 86°56'59" east, continuing along said lines, a distance of 1379.92 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northeast corner of said FSCS Co. tract and Lot 11, Block A of said subdivision; THENCE south 2°53'35" east along the east boundary line of said FSCS tract and Lot 11, a distance of 379.39 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said FSCS tract; THENCE south 86°59'04" west along the south boundary line of said FSCS tract, a distance of 2527.35 feet to a point; THENCE south 87°18'40" west, continuing along said south boundary line, a distance of 338.60 feet to a point for a corner, same A-13/CAPRIOORN MPH//PACE ONE is being the southwest corner of said FSCS tract and in the east line of said county road, THENCE north 2°45'51" west along the west boundary line of said FSCS tract and the east line of said county road, a distance of 379.69 feet to the place of beginning and containing 414.56 acres of land, more or less. Tract III: BEGINNING of the northwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to James H. Russell, Jr. by deed recorded in Volume 578, Page 515 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, same being the southwest corner of the above described Tract II, said point also lying in the east line of a north and south county road known as Geesling Road; THENCE south 89°32'49" east along the north boundary line -)f said Russell tract, same being the south boundary line of the above described Tract II, a distance of 338.12 feet to a point; THENCE south 89°50'58" east, continuing along said lines, a distance of 2526.83 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said above described Tract II; THENCE south 0°17'13" east, a distanco of 663.40 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 89°5621" west, a distance of 712.0 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 89°24'39" west, a distance of 728.48 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°07'52" east, a distance of 985.11 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the north line of the east and west county road known as Slagg Road; THENCE north 89°54'30" west along the north line of elagg Road, a distance of 719.56 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 0°05'30" east, a distance of 365 feet to a point for a corner; THEME north 89°54'30" west, a distance of 36.28 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 46°13'49" east, a distance of 45;10 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 89°59'49" west, a distance of 549.5 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 40`27'41" west, a distance of 255.8 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the east line of Geesling Road; and the west boundary line of said Russell tract; THENCE north 0°00'11" west, along the west boundary line of said kussell tract and east line of Geesling Road, a distance of 459.04 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 89°54'18" east, a distance of 337.0 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 0°55'15" east, a distance of 538.17 feet to a point for a corner; A•13/CAPRICORN KPH//PAGE TWO THENCE north 89027'34 vest, a distance of 337 feet to a point for a corner in the east line of said Geesling Road; THENCE north 0°30'22" west, along the east line of GeeslLng Road, a distance of 59.37 feet to the place of beginning and containing 65.12 acres of land, more or less. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1985, at 7:00 O'clock P. M. in the City Council Chamfers of tie Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti y council C am ers o t e Municipal Building cf the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear end be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. RICKARD 0. STBUT, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CWLOTTE LEN, CITY SEC ETARY A-13/CA^RICWN MPH//PAGE THREE Jl~ 4 I Y 4 , M • r yr I ro" 1 I VIII I I r1. • -s I •I J t1, ~,1 i`V 0 `ft1 A-13 ANNEWiON SCHEDULE' t:7 February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 05, 1985 City Council sets date, time and I place for public hearing March 06, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March 11, 1985 Submit agenda item March 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 19, 1985 City Council holds public hearing March 20, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item March 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 02, 1985 City Council holds public hearing April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City Council to institute annexation proceedings April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton xecord Chronicle April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance flay 27, 1985 Submit agenda item flay 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *June 041 1985 Final action by city Council *Denotes action by the City Council 0964g DATE: 03/05/85 CITY COUNCIL pBPORT FOitMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRAM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE DATE, TIME, AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING THE PETITION OF R. 0. MCDONNELL FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 34.60 ACRES SITUATED IN THE M. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT 417 AND BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET SOUTH OF AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTER LINE OF F.M. 426 AND APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF MAYHILL ROAD (A-14) j RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that public hearings be held on March 19 and April 2. The Planning and Zonirg Covmisaton will make a recommendation on the annexation and zoning at its meeting of March 131 1985. 3 RY: The purpose of the annexation is to allow City control of development standards and land use. A petition for a change in zoning for duplex and commercial land use has been submitted. BACKGROUND: N/A ~ROCRAMS DEPARTMENTS QR CROUPS AFFECTED: If annexed and toned, all City departments providing basic services (Police, Fire, Solid haste, ctc.) future residents and businesses. FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Rsapectfull• submit d: • G. Chris Hartung Pre;ared byyQ:~~City Manager ~s David 91112on Senior Planner A rove Jiff e Direct r of P inning and Community Development 06951 10111, NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the CitrCouncil Cham ers o t e unicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexatS.)n by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below. On the d of 1983 at 7:00 in the City ZruuncilyCham ers o the unic pail Buildingoofl`he City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, said point lying in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 83.134, said point also lying 250 feet south of and perpendicular to the center line of F.H. 426 (East McKinney) and in the west boundary line of a tract of land conveyed to R. 0. McDonnell by deed recorded in Volume 1200, Page 462 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas: THENCE south his°18'50" east along the present city limits, 250 feet south of and parallel with the centcrline of F.M. 426 (East McKinney), a distance of 319.22 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 64°33'48" east along said lines, a distance of 424.31 feet to a point foz a corner; THENCE south 63°44'11" east, along said lines, a distance of 316.39 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°10'40" west, a distance of 664.96 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 1°00'46" east, a distance of 798.58 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the south boundary line of said McDonnell tract; THENCE north 89°30'13" west, along the south boundary line of said McDonnell tract, a distance of 812.67 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of said McDonnell tract; THENCE north 1°00'46" west, slong a west boundary line of said McDonnell tract a distance of 798.58 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 88°07'49" west, along a south boundary line of said tract, a distance of 158.15 feet to a point for a corner; A•14/R. 0. MCDONNELL/PACE ONE r , THENCE north 1°00'54" east, along a west boundary line of said tract, a distance of 692.37 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 0°14'47" west, along a west boundary line of said tract, a distance of 321.99 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 1°11'58" west, along a west boundar line of said tract, a distance of 78.75 feet to the place oy f beginning and containing 34.60 acres of land, more or less. SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be ublished once in a newspaper having general circulation in the Ci,.y and in the above described territory not more then forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in accordance with the Municip al Annexation Act (Article 910&9 Vernon's Texas Civil Statuteal. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of . 1985. RICHARD 0. 5TEWART, FRYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS kTTEST: €TM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS l A-14/R. 0. MCDONNELL/PAGE TWO ,rte. lOllb r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEKATIuN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton. Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being vituated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, said point lying in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 83-134, said point also lying 250 feet south of and perpendicular to the center line of F.M. 426 (East McKinney) and in the west boundary line of a tract of land conveyed to R. 0. McDonnell by deed recorded in Volume 1200, Page 462 of the Dee6 Records of Denton County, Texas: THENCE south 68°18'50" east along the present city limits, 250 feet south of and parallel with the centerline of F.M.,426 (East McKinney), a distance of 319.22 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 64°33'48" ecst along said lines, a distance of 424.31 feet co a point for a corner; THENCE south 63°44'11" east, along said lines, a distance of 316.39 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0°10'40" west, a distance of 664.96 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 1000'46" east, a distance of 798.58 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the south boundary line of said McDonnell tract, THENCE north 89°30'13" west, along the south boundary line of said McDonnell tract, a distance of 812.67 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of said McDonnell tract; THENCE north 1°00'46" vest, along a west buundary line of said McDonnell tract a distance of 798.58 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 88°07'49" west, along a south boundary line of said tract, a distance of 158.15 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 1°00'54" east, along a west boundary line of said tract, a distance of 692.37 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 0°14'47" west, along a west boundary line of said tract, a distance of 321.99 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 1°11'58" west, along a west boundary line of said tract, a distance of 78.75 feet to the place of beginning and containing 34.60 acres of land, more or less. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of tine City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti y -Council C am era o Me Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters heroin mentioned, will take notice. A-14/R. 0. MCDONNEWPAGE ONE vl A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1983, at 7:00 o'clock P. ?l. in the C tf y council ChamFers o~f[Fr Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. RICHARD 0. STIVXRT-,-RXM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLER, CITY SECRETM A-14/R. 0 MCDONNBLL/PAGE TWO 1 r' '980 • ~ r~~ Sla Rai. - II • I~ r I ~ INJL,, r . A-14 f f^~' I' I A-14 rr'. L~ ANNEXATION SC' EDOLY' February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 05, 1985 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing March 06, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March 11, 1985 Submit agenda item March 12, 1985 Submit agenda be.,k-up *March 19, 1985 City Council holds public hearing March 20, 1985 Notice to Dc.iton Record Chronicle March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item March 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 02, 1985 City Council holds public hearing April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of city Council to institute annexation proceedings April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance May 27, 1985 tSubmit agenda item May 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *June 040 1985 Final action by City Council *Denotes action by the City Ccuncil 0964g c` is DATE: 03/0$/85 CITY COUNCtt REPORT FORMAT T0: Mayor and ~ambees of the City Council FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE DATB, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HKPRINGS REGARDINU THE PETITION OF THE CITY OF DENTON FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 42.35 ACRES OF LAND BEING PART OF THE S. HUIZAR SURVEY, ABSTRACT 514 AND BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTER LIVE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 360 AND WEST OF MASCH BRANCH ROAD (A-15) RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval. Staff recommends that public hearings be held on March 19, and April 2. SUMMARY: This site represents the balance of the Tri-Steel Structures, Inc. property beginning north of 380 West and west of Masch Branch Road. Zoning and plat approval for a five acre office site has been avproved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. BACKGROUND: The City Council directed staff to annex the entire Tri-Steel Structures, Inc. property in October, 1984. Annexation of the entire parcel was delayed pending submission of a proper legal de3cription. This is an involuntary annexation; however, the propert; owner has not objected to date. PRA S. DEPARTMENTS OR_GROUPS AFFECTED: No population or housing exists at the site FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Respectfull submitt : .7 Prepared by: G. Chris Hartung City Manager I ,a ~,Qrn David Ellison Senior Planner APP vo Jeff "eye Director of Planning and Commuotty Development 0693s 1012h NO, ANNEXATiOU OF CERTAIN PROPERTY YtrTHEACITYP OF EDENTON,,H TEXASPOAND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. H. in the City ouncil ChamSers o t e unicipal Building of the City to appear andbbec heard hearing giving Denton, Texas, interested eperCity sons will hold a the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below. On the day of , 1985, at 1:00 o'clock P.M. in the City ouncil ChamSers 6T-M Aunicipal Building of the City appear andbbec heard hearing all interested eperCity sons will hold a giving Denton* the proposed annexation by the CiLy of Denton, Texas of the following describe4 property, to-vit: All that certain tract .:r parcel of lard lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of. Texas, being part of the S. Huizar Survey, Abr,cact No. 514, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as described in Ordinance No. 14-36, Tract 5, grid point lying 500 feet north of and S. H. wcenter oconv.eyed to John F. Browntby deed recorded in Volume 1091, Page 748 of the Deed Records of Denton Count), Texas; THENCE north 0°49'16" west aloes the west boundaryline n a of said Brown tract, a distance of 969.60 feet to a pndar corner, same being the northwest corner of said frown tract; THENCE north 89°02'33" east along the north boundary line of said Brown tract, a dixtarce of 2090.55 feet to a point for a cor'.ier, south countytract, northfandsaid roadaknown ias lying bin nthe h wet northeast ofcorner Masch Branch Road; THENCE south 1°23'18" ea::, along the east boundary lire of said Brown tract, same being the wcat line if said county road, a distance of 555.7 feet to a point for a corner; a point of . a 9 crefeet to ek-, center 390.89 THENsouth CE ' point lying in distanc6 of for a THENCE sr,..therly along the center tin* of said :reek tae cllowing fire (5)) c.118: 1) south 12°54'08" ea%t 95.07 feet; (2) south 56 16'3i" west, 18.4 feet; (3) south 87 41'54" west 106.69 feet; (4 south 20°57'02" west, 132.88 feet; (5) south Si*07111" east, 211.41 feet to a point for a corner in the said present city A-15/TRI-STEEL STRUCTURES, INC./PAGE ONE 1 t.. ti 1 k.: , i 5'' 4 T i . THENCE north 89°21'56" west, along the said present city limits a distance of 1587.90 feet to the place of beginning and containing 42.35 acres of land, more or less. SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspaper having genwral circulation in the City and in the above described territory not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in accordance with the Muuici al Annexation Act (Article 970x, Vernon's Texas Civil Stp.tuterf. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985. RICHARD 0. STE7KK7-tRA= CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE AELENO CITY SEC ET W CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENro, TEXAS BY. . A-1S/TRI-STEEL STRUCTURES, INC./PAGE rwO 1.14 Tl r-'I. Y n c 1;'11" 'a a y r r" . 5 n 4 ' 1 1'~ t Y 4 0. [ v U~Yk ,_p.i S 1 S 4 1012L q NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposer, to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit: All that certain erect or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the S. Huizar Survey, Abstract No. 514, and more particularly descr0ad as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as described in Ordinance No. 74.36, Tract 5, said point lying 500 feet north of and perpendicular to the center line of U. S. Hwy. 380 and in the west boundary line of a tract of land conveyed to John F. Brown by deed recorded in Volume 1092, Page 748 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 0°49'16" west aloe the west boundary line of said Brown tract, a distance of 969.60 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northwest corner of said Brown tract; THENCE north 89°02'33" east along the north boundary line of said Brown tract, a distance of 2090.55 feet to a point for a corner, some being the northeast corner of said Brown tract, said point lying in the west line of a north and south county road known as Masch Branch Road; THENCE south 1°23'18" east, along the east boundary line of said Brown tract, same being the west Line of said county road, a distance of 555.7 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 88°36'24" west, a distance of 390.89 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the center of a creek; THENCE southerly along hc center line of said cr%ek the following five (5) calls: (1) south 12°54'08" east, 95.07 feet; (2) s.iuth 56016 '35" west, 178.4 foetal (3) south 87 48'54" west, 106.69 feet; (4) soutli 20°57'02" wes~, 132.88 feet; (5) south 51°07'11" east, 219.41 feet to a point for a corner in the said present city limits; THENCE north 89°21'56" west, along the said present city limits a distr..sce of 1587.90 feet to the place of beginning and containing 42.5 acres of land, more or less. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti y`C'ouncil Chambers o tFe Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persona interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and pla,.e all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton. Texas, on the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the Cny`Council Cham bare. o this Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons A-15/TRI-STEEL STRUCTURES, INC./PAGE ONE interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested it, the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I ATTEST: ALLEN, CHfiRLOTTE CITY SECKnM A-1S/TRI-STEEL STRUMMES, INC./PAGE TWO ~ ~ .,_',7"v 'iz'R'~F' A i !n p e'.. s e W ki ~ a.~F~ , ~ ~u .i. , 't . ~4 r D J II ' Z~ fie 11 r:. o n r I r i- r r A-15 ANNEXATION kffEbOLR E~ February 25, 1985 S»'omit agenda item f February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up ffff *March 05, 1985 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing March 06, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March Ill 1985 Submit agenda item March 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 191 1985 City Council holds public hearing March 20, 1985 Uotice to Denton Record Chronicle March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item March 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 02, 1985 City Council holds public hearing April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of city Council to institute annexation proceedings April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance May 27, 1985 Submit agenda item May 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *June 04, 1985 Final action by City Council *Denotes action by the City Council 0964g DAfKt 03105/85 CITY COUNCIL RIPORT FORMAT TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council, FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE DATE, TIME, AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING THE PETITION OF HAMMETT & NASlI, INC. AND THE CITY OF DENTON FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 150 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF MAYHILL ROAD APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET XORT;I OF I-35 (A-17) E OMME DATIOW; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation will be made at its meeting of March 13, 1985. Staff recommends that public hearings be held on March 19 and April 2. SUMMARY., This petition for annexation we* precipitated by a voluntary petition for annexation and zoning. The tract is also adjacent and north of the M.K.T. Railroad. BACKGROUND; Hammett 6 Nash Eogineers an' surveyors, Inc. have submitted a request for annexation and light industrial zoning on a 50 acre portion of this site. Staff is recommending annexing the addi►lonal 100 acres to incorporate all of the area west of Mayhill Road. sigh intensity Development Guide Policies are applicable. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All departments responsible for services and programs guaranteed to City residents (Police, Fire, Solid Waste, Library, etc.) One house and an estimated 2 persons are located in the area. FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Respectful y submi ed; s G. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepare by; David Ellison Senior Planner Ap oved, UJiff AGAIL-A M- 1% Direct r of -planning and Community Developwat 1055E - 'C4 R 1024L , NO. I AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City- ouncil Cham ersof`tWe--Runicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Coun:il will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below. On the day of , 1995, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the City-Coancil Chsm ere of the Municipal Building of the City of Denton, 'texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being oituated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the D. Hou h Survey, Abstract No. 6469 and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a yoint in present city limits as established by Jrdinance No. 81-94, said point lying in Mayhill toad at the northeast corner of the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. 646, same being the southeast corner of the J. Brandon Survey, Abstract No. 1515; THENCE west along the north boundary line of said Hough Survey same being thu south boundary line of said Brandon Survey, passing the southwest corner of the said Brandon Survey, same being the southeast corner of J. V. Cneek Survey, Abstract No. 3240 a distance of 2640 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner of the said D. Hough Survey, same being the northeast corner of the J. White Survey, Abstract No. 1433, said point also being a corner of the pr,!,ent city limits as described in Ordinance No. 84.17; THENCE south along the said present city limits, same being '.he west bounder Wit ine of said Hough Survey and the east boundary line of the said e' Survey to a point for a corner in the southwest right-of-way line of the N.K. 6 T. Railroad; THENCE southeasterly, along said present city limits, same being the southwest right-of-way line of the M.K. 6 T. Railroad to a point for a corner at tho intersection of the east right-of-way line of Mayhill Road with the southwest right-uf-way line of the M.K. 6 T. Railroad, said point also lying in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 78.38; THENCE north 78°41'20" east along said present city limits, crossing said railroad right-of-way, a distance of 100.0 feet to a point for a corner; A-17/HAMMETT b HASH, INC./PACE ONE Sk t} n 't. _~e ~j .b sA ifi' ;~l( ',~f: .fir;~ n .r `~~~~~iR'~ti°,~ • THENCE north 54°31'50" east along said present city limits, a distance of 88 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 31°41' oast along said present city limits, a distance of 66 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 10°5l'09" east along said present city limits, a distance of 46.68 feet to a point for a corner, same being a corner in the present city limits as described in Ordinance No. f8-38 end 83-16; THENCE. north 4°13'44" east along the present city limits as described in Ordinance No. 83-16g same being the west boundary line of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330 and the east boundary line of the D. Lombard Survey, Abstract No. 784 and in Ilayhill Road, a distance of 719.12 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 2°25'30" east along said present city limits, same being the west boundary line of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330 and the east boundary line of the D. Lombard Survey, Abstract No. 784 and the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. 646, and in Mayhill Road, a distance of, 1140.8 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northwest corner of the tract described in Ordinance No. 83.16; THENCE north 2° east continuing along said ltrpe and in said road a distance of 1746 feat, more or less, to the ,lace of beginning ani containing 150 acres of land, more or less. SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorited and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the above describeo territory not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in secordence with the Munictp&I Annexation Act (Article 970x, Verncn's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect imcediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985. RICHMI) 0. SMVART~ MAYO CITY OF DENTON TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE AILENt CITY SECKETM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS A-17/HAMMETT 6 HASH, INC.,PAGE TWO S i a r pp r ~f -1024L! NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of -aid City to add 06 following described territory to the corporate limits of the city of Denton, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. !46, and more particularly describod as follows: BEGINNING at a point in present citv limits as established by Ordinance No. 81-Y4s said point lying in Mayhill Road at the northeast corner of the D. Houpla Survey Abstract No. 646, same being the southeast corner of the J. irandon Survey, Abstract No. .519; THENCE west along the north boundary line of said Hough Survey enure w iag the south boundary line of said Brandon Surv% . passin8 the southwest corner cf the said Brandon Surrey, sa.e being the southeast corner of J. W. Cheek Survey, Abstract No. 324, a distance of 2640 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner of the said D. Hough Survey, acme ?rein the northeast corner of the J. White Survey, Abstract No. 1433, said point also being a corner of the present city limits as described in Ordinance No. 84.17; [HENCE south along the said present city limits, same being the west boundary line of said Hough Survey ami the east boundary line of the said White Survey to a point for a corner in the southwest right-of-way line of the M.K. & T. Railroad, THENCE southeasterly, s'.ong said present city limits, same being the southwest right-of-way line of the M.K. & T. Railroad to a point fo, a corner at the intersection of the east right-e-f-way line of Hayhill Road with the southwest right-of-way line of the M.K. & T. Railroad, said point also lyingg in the present city limits as established '+y Ordinance No. 8-3ir; THENCE north 78°41'20" east along said present city limits, crossing said railroad right-of-way, a distance of 100.0 feet to a point fot a corner; THENCE north 54°31'50" east along said present city limits, a distance of 88 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 31°41' east along said present city limits, a distance of 66 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 10°51'09" east along said present city limits, a distance of 46.68 feet to a point for a corner, same botng a corner in the present city limits as described in Ordinance No. 78.38 and 83.16; THENCE north 4°13'44" east along the present city limits as described in Ordinance No. 83-i6, same being ibe west boundary line of the 0. Walker Survey, Abstract Nn. 1330 and the east boundary line of the D. Lombard Survey, Abstract No. 784 and in Mayhill Road, a distance of 719.12 feat to a point for a cotter; A-17/HAMMETT & HASH, INC./PACE ONE 1r'~?`W'} A ~'-i" ~ ~ ~ 1 7 h . r ! i y x r r ,~'.i 4d, aw ~ • THENCE north 2°25'30" east along said present city limits, same being the west boundary line of the 0. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330 and the east boundary :ins of the D, Lombard Survey, Abstract No. 784 and the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. 646 and in Mayhiil Road, a distance of 1140.8 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northwest corner of the tract described in Ordinance No. 83-16, THENCE north 2° east continuing along said lines and in said road a distance of 1746 feat, more or leas, to the place of beginning and containing 15C acres of land, more or less. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1985, at 1:00 o'clock P. M. In the C ti y Council Chambers o the Municipal building of the Ciry of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in tho above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters end things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Heating will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C tf-y Council Ctiam ers o t e Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At slid tias and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all parsons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. KTMMFT.7--,q) 90k'i' -KMfF CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: A-17/HAMMETT S HASH, INC,/PACE TWO a u : ~iy„Y^ iv u- ~ ~i ~.i ' ~ ih 4 + rri in . n r tip 'Y Yr'- ~ . a , zv a -_,'"'x ~ r~ ,u n . ` „~^G ~ 5 b u,' ~ . i~?!t .c~~ ~h r.: t. ~~r X , r' fI~ ~ f . Ij M ♦ t A_j z 1 i~ ~ `rte ♦ ~ 1 ! Ir: . r nA w.Y r 1 .,'i C r, a 'i> i + .$'x ll✓~~ A-17 ANNEXATION SCNEDUL; ` February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 05, 1985 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing March 06, 1985 Notice to )enton Record Chronicle March 08, 1.985 publish notice and mailout March 11, 1983 Submit agenda item March 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 19, 1985 City council holds public hearing March 20, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March 251 1985 Submit agenda item Ma ch 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April Ct, 1985 City Council holds public hearing April 15, 1985 Submi, agenda ! teen April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City Council to i3stitute annexation proceedings Apri; 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance may 27, 1985 Submit agenda item May 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *June 04, 1985 Final action by City Council *Denotes action by the city council 09648 DATR: 03/05/85 CITY COUNCIL RRPORT FORMAT ) T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council l~ FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE DATE, TINE, AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING THE PETITION OF REDDITCH INVESTMENTS CORPORATION FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 60.38 ACRES SITUATED IN THE G. WALKER SURVEYo ABSTRACT. 1330, AND BEGINNING ADJACENT AND EAST OF EDWARDS ROAD (A-18) R%COMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommendation will be available following the meeting of March 13, 1985. Staff recommends that public hearings be held on March 19 and April 2. ~Ut44ARY The petitioners have submitted a request for annexation and the attachments include a concert plan which staff anticipates as the basis for a future change in zoning request. Edwards Road to an unimproved diet road that must be upgraded at developer': expense. Low intensity Development Guide polictea are applicable to this site. 9-49KOROI!; u : This site abuts property approved for mobtle home park use (originally called Allan Estates). Existing Andrew Corporation facilities and property to located south of tho tract. Devolopment Guide policies for low intensity areas are, applicable. Curcent tail use patterno along, the Mayhill Road corrtdor ranges from low and moderate density residential to the City Wastewater Treatment Plant and new Landfill and light industrial. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: No existing housing or population will be affected by this proposed annexation. FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Respectfully submitped: 0. Chris Hartung city manager Prepared} by: 0 aAe~ David Ellison Senior Planner APP ve JoEf Mo Director of Planning and Community Development 10568 ~6 n+i `K 1 .fr ! y. k . ' 10174 NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City-Council Cham erab'of-t►e--'Runicipat Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below. On the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.K. in the City-Council Chamber= o`fthe Municipal Building of the Ciry of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abtract No. 1330 and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point being the northeast corner of the tract described in annexation Ordi-once No. 83-16, same being the northwest corner of a tract of lan, described in Volume 297, Page 584 of the deed records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE south 86033' east along the north boundary line of said tract, a distance of 1412.1 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northeast corner Laid tract; THEN^.E south 2°14' west along the east boundary line of acid tract, a distance of 1867.0 feet to a point for a corner in an east and west portion of a county road known as Edwards Road, same being the southeast corner of said tract; THENCE north 86°08' west along the south boundary line of said tract and in said road, a distance of 1331.3 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of said tract; THENCE north 10°22' west along the west boundary line of said tract and in said road, a distance of 505.5 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 3°21' east continuing along the west boundary line of said tract and in said road, passing at 203.4 feet the southeast corner o! acid tract described in annexation ordinance No. 83.16 and continuing along said lines and city limits for a total distance of 1357.8 feet to the place of beginning and containing 60.36 acres of land, more or lass. A-18/REDDITCH INVESTMENTS, CORP./PAGE ONE . ,e a~z~ 1 s '-t, d ate x". i E' •a- r A.1 , , SECTION It. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the above described territory not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 910a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION Ill. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985. RICHARD 0. S TgXff-,-RM CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTONsTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY. A-181REDDITCN INVESTMENTS, CORP./PAGE TWO t ~ Y . r tl •<S. . an" X `f .rv i .I . t ,f r.t .i.. l:1 ~ r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel o: land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abtract No. 1330 and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point being the northeast corner of the tract described in annexation Ordinance No. 83-16, same being the northwest corner of a tract of land described in Volume 297, Page 584 of the deed records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE south 86°53' east along the north boundary line of said tract, a distance of 1412.5 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northeast corner said tract; THENCE south 2°14' west along the east boundary line of said tract, a distance of 1867.0 feet to a point for a corner in an east and west portion of a county road known as Edwards Road, same being the south- east corner of said tract; THENCE north 86°08' west along the south boundary line of said tract and in said road, a distance of 1331.3 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of said tract; THENCE north 10°22' west along the west boundary line of said tract and in said road, a distance of 505.5 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 3°27' east continuing along the west boundary line of said tract and in said road passing at 203.4 feet the southeast corner of said tract describes in annexation Ordinance No. 83-16, and continuing along said lines and city limits for a total distance of 1357.8 feet to the place of beginning and containing 60.38 acres of land, more or leas. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City ouncil Chambers o the unicipal Building of the Cit-, of Denton, Texas, :or all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right, to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City Touncil Chamber- of t-R-Wunicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. RICHARD 0. STEWARTO MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALCEN, CITY Y A-18/REDDITCH INVESTMENTS, CORP. 4 l •.r.•e ti; I • I , /ir + I , f I •r I i • t A-f8 , WA "I A64b 'I i, i COWARDS OAP (C11Y of DENTOW Q n a° A-18 ALLA 4 ES+AUS J Med+Lt NOME Y r Lt K r ROAD ANDREW CORP ZONE AC. LOTS DENSITY r S.F., 7 25.0 113 4.5 ZERO q.4 31 5.4 4 M. F. 12.q 194 15 t*/t FLOWA6"i 13.083 Ra Ot:b. i TOTAL 60.393 358 5.q ti ~s F VICINITY MAP i" 1000' N ARkER OULV A-18 ANNEXATION SCIi i 6 I;~ February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item February 260 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 051 1985 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing March 061 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March U8, 1983 Publish notice and mafiout March 11, 1985 Submit agenda item March z2, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *March 19, 1985 City Counk,il holds public hearing March 200 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item March 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 02, 1985 City Council holds public hearing April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City Council to institute annexation proceedings April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance May 27, 1985 Submit agenda item may 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *June 04, 1985 Final action by City Council *Denotes action by the City Council 09649 r r DATE: 03/05/15 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: REPORT ON TABLED ZONING CASE Z-1675 RECOHMENDATION: The City Council considered this item at its meeting of Augurt 7, 1984 and voted to table Z-1675. SUMMARY: This is a request for a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 19.3 acre tract located on the south aide of Highland Park Road approximately 1,500 feet east of Bonnie Bcae Road. If approved, the planned development will permit 71 single Gamily detached lots and a private school. BACxGROUND: The City Council tabled this request to allow the developer and staff time to work out a solution to the access problem associated with this tract. On January 24, 19850 the Planning and Community Development Department received a letter from the petitioner withdrawing case Z-1675 from consideration by the City Council. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. Re~pactr su m[ Led: 3}~~+CJ~FJ C/ • ? G. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by, Denise Spi ey Urban Planner 0 Ap V &400s"- Jeff Hall" Director of Planning and Community Nvelopment 1051t MWTTi~ i a./ , I4`L fn tl tl `i r1 ."r t CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: February 26, 1985 TO: G. Chris Hartung. City Manager FROM: Denise Spivey, Urban Planner SUBJECT: ZONING CASE Z-1675 i This zoning case was a request for a change from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classification on a 19.3 acre tract located on the south side of Highland Park Road approximately 1,500 feet east of Bonnie Brae Road. If approved, the planned development (PD) will permit 71 single family detached structures and a two (2) acre private school site. The City Council conducted a public hearing for this case on August 7, 1964 and voted to table the request to allow the developer and staff to work our, a solution to the access problems associated with this tract. On January 24, 1985, the Planning and Community Development Department received a letter from the petitioner withdrawing case Z-1675 from consideration by the city council. Denise S iv g'. 1052g I / 'fl { '/i . 'r'. pi, ~I I s'.1 i r lp Yd: ! 1: i f P Christopher Bancroft Operations 1421 North Elm Denton, Texas 76201 January 24, 1984 City of Denton Developement Review Committee Denton, Texas 76201 To Whom It May Concern: Effective immediately, I am withdrawing; my zoning change request, Z-1675, which was presented to the City of Denton Planning and Zoning Commission on July, 11, 1984 and approved and thereafter presented to the City Council on August 7, 1984 and tabled. Signed . Christop r Bancrof , Developer t Z'2 yd7 Date Signed and Acknowledged Denise 5111vey, Developement. Review planner /As As' Date Y roe % r is kr •i Y,' Jy 1 • ~.~;R 4"~ tip tw •y . fit.. t~++i1 ' • .;Y 'ice, ~ i ~ w•. ~1 ~ r ~~f Z' 1, ~ j ~a ~ 4•_ * b+Ln yl ir. 10 • . , J Y,1 • • 1. yr , . ya oz. 0 t • the ko. r r ~r • • •,r, '1~~ ~S. Irk f lbl. is f•. eK ! • S ~.~,~.,r tit it- % / - • \ 1't-, l'.r pl.. a, . _l~__~1-1111 lit .7, f r + L:^/~^`yl~ 1ts• may, ♦J. ~ , 1.~.•Ia• ,J1~ ►~tii`'r y.~JJt a•..' / .ter" . •~~r1 • i♦IP 46 te' " . S• •.1~•~a*! ' FI. M ♦ •i '.Y, =tip ♦ yt~' ~t° .•t'Zq ~L Ad 'T tty~~+ { ti 1:.` r 1~t;.1/ lr+~; y•. +1.~ ' f'y tt1 :r ♦ ~ Q h . Y • ~ ~ uL 1.-~ )a~!l • 't ,t •M•a4yR~ 7~ ~ •1„"''~. wil 1 M•~N•i ¢ 't t ` a tea d. na~ t, a• a'~ c' 'i`'C~_t „ 11; i ~,~~j~✓f. , ,1 •_]~1 r1, x'T 40;1 'h 1;tld bra. Y+1+a •~~rl~'~,•,~yt. rt'J: i, , • 1,• :a 1 t + hid • ;1'4'K Mi'r" .t ro`t . •t of ~ is DATE: 03/05185 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT ~ I0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM, G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: DISPOSITION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY (D-39) RECOMMENDATION: The Development; Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning commission recommend approval. j SUMMARY* A tract of 0.462 acres being lots 9 and 10 in the Meadowbrook Subdivision. BACKGROUND: This tract was deeded to the City as part of a drainage easement which is no longer required. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. Resp~fu sub t d: .i 0. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: K) l"~ Ctu..O Harry N Persaud Urban Planner App?Ye14- NIN'd Jeff Me 'A rector of Planning and Community Development 06518 f k vu CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March S. 1985 SUBJECT: Disposition of public property described as Lot 9 and 10 Meadowbrook Subdivision (D-39) SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.462 acres situated north of and abutting Windsor Drive and west of Sherman Drive and more fully described as Lot 9 and 10 as shown in the Meadowbrook Subdivision. City of Denton. This tract of land was transferred to the City on July 23, 1975 by the Denton Loan and Investment Company as part of a drainage easement. The easement is no lon7er required for the proper use and development of land in this area. The existing City easement on-site would need to be abandoned before disposition of the property can be effected. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the disposition RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the disposition of Lot 9 and 10 of the Meadowbrook Subdivision. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of disposition request ATTACHMENT: Reduced map Harry N.QPersaud Urban Planner 06579 II I ,.r/q Vr OI/A ' ~ ref f •l1 .M /p ~ r uv rln IAJ. r1 rl4 nv F O. 7 ♦I,y k. , to Fu l ...n ~p1•~ o~~ t o . .L,• i M. • ♦ •1 i I , e' A it a W I r t pro ~ 0, A . • ~ 1 sir ' ~ / ti . r MEADOWBR00K SUBDIVISION ' 1Q1.4 C'ARffP r~UHVIr 'V,,' (AI'lp SUf:Yf' r AM Am fleet to rNt Clfr or 144r04, rl.d'. Clete" LOAM AND IMMrM(yf (CMCAYV 04 .to OMM r" :r MONA GIlAO MAN App F'IUhIIUI wvO[',t O. nlrl Ot ul r. A ( loi +J 1 l 1 W C VARALM CAN,0 tat 1 EIO(M b , Ky, il' _NV c P & Z Minutes February 13, 1985 Page 9 Pablo Rubio, representing the petitioner, stated when the zoning was brought to the Commission, we presented a conceptual site plan including streets, utilities, drain- age, etc. He stated his client has no problem with providing another access, but seems to me we would have to go back to the zoning stage. Mr. Clark stated even if bridges are built, it is a huge cost to the engineer as well as the city to maintain and if water goes over the second bridge, there is no guar- antee it won't go over the first. On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Clark stated the bridges are built on a 15 year storm plan not 10U years. 8. Recommend disposition of public property described as lots 9 and 100 Meadowbrook Subdivision (north of Windsor Drive and west of Sherman Drive) (D-39). Mr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 0.462 acres situated north of and abutting Windsor Drive and west of Sherman Drive. This tract of land was transferred to the City of Denton on July 23, 1975 by the Denton Loan and Investment Company as part of a drainage easement. The easement is no longer required for the proper use and development of land in this area. The existing city easement on-site would need to be abandoned before disposition of the property can be effected. He stated staff recormends disposition. On question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Persaud said yea, the property will be zoned that of adjacent properties. Mr. Juren made a recommwndation to apppprove the disposition of public property deecribed as lot Y and 10, Meadowbrook Subdivision (D-39). Seconded by Mr. i Claiborne and carried 6-0. Mr. LaPorte abstained. C. Recommend disposition of ap roximately 17 acres of public property located pin the M. Austin Survey, Abstract 4 (north of Spencer Road and east of Woodrow Lane) (D-40). Mr. Clark showed the location of the property on the transparency map and explained the plane for the land. He stated it will improve access and the use of the remaining water plant tract for future facility expansions should greatly benefit from Morris' Street. He stated since the city did not want to po to expand Morris Street and extend utilities across the frontage, they are wanting to put the land up for priblic bid. On 4usitLon he said, the city can call a bond at any time for the developer to extend the streets. He stated all citizens of Denton will benefit from Morrie Sttest being connected between Woodrow Lane and Loop 188. He added sale of this ropperty (Morris Street construction) will greatly facil~to a this effort also. Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend disposition of approximately 17 acres of public property located in the M. Austin Survey, Abstract 4 (north of Spencer Road and east of Woodrow Lane) (D-40). Seconded by Ms. Cole and carried 6.1. (Mr. Juren voted no.) D. Establish meeting date and time for work session on policies and procedures, t. DATE: 03/05/85 CM COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO% Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: DISPOSITION OF PUBLIC PROPRRTY (D-40) RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval. SUMMARY. A tract of 16.6 acres situated north of the Water Plant and east of Woodrow Lane. BACKGROUND: The sale of this tract will accelerate the Integrated development of roads and utility systems in that area. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR CROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: I Not applicable. Respectfully submit d: 0. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: Harry N, ersau6 Urban Planner Ap ov Jeff eke Director of Planning and Community Development 10488 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March 5, 1985 SUBJECT: DISPOSITION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY (D-40) SUMMI'.RY: This is a tract of approximately 16,6 acres situated east of Woodrow Lane and north of the Water Plant. The bid for the sate of the land will include the construction of Moree Street and all utilities which would be needed across the frontage of the property. The Public Utilities Board considered and approved of the disposition of this property. The dispoiition and future development of this tract will provide improved access in this atea and allow for better use of land in the vicinity of the Water Plant. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of disposition RECOMMENDATION. The Development Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning commission recommend approval of the disposition (D-40). ATTACHMENT: Location Map ~A0. wC~a . Harry N Persaud Urban Planner 10488 77 11 P It Z Minutes February 13, 1965 Page 9 Pablo Rubio, representing the petitioner, stated when the zoning was brought to the Commission, we presented a conceptual site plan including streete, utilities, drain- age, etc. He stated his client has no problem with providing another access, but seems to me we would have to go back to the zoning stage. Mr. Clark stated even if bridges are built, it is a huge cost to tLe engineer as well as the city to ma.`.ntain and if water goeover the second bridge, there is no guar- antee it won't go over the first. On question Etom Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Clark stated the bridges are built on a 25 year etorm plan not IOU years. B. kecommend disposition of public property described as lots 9 and 10 Meadowbrook Subdivision (north of Windsor Drive ann west of Sherman Drive) (D-39). Hr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 0.462 acres situated north of and abutting Windsor Drive and vast of Sherman Drive. This tract of land was transferred to the City of Denton on July 23, 1975 by the Denton Loan and Investment Company as part of a drainage easement. The easement is no longer required for the propel: use and development of land in this area. The existing city easement on-site would need to be abandoned before disposition of the property can be effected. He stated staff recommends disposition. On question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Persaud said yes, the property will be toned that of adjacent properties. Mr. Juren made a recommendation to approve the disposition of ;public property described as lot 9 and 10, Meadowbrook Subdivision (D-39). Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and carried 6-0. Mr. LaForte abstained. C. Recommend disposition of approximately 17 acres of public property located in the M. Austin Survey, Abstract 4 (north of Spencer Koad and east of Woodrow Lane) (D-40). Mr. Clark shoved the location of the property on the transparency map and explained the plans for the land. He stated it will improve access and the use of the remaining water plant tract for future facility expansions should greatly benefit from Morris$ Street. He stated since the city did not went to payy to expand they are wantingdtoxputdtheilande up sfo epublicfbid. On usstion he said, the city can call a bond at any time or the developer to extend the streets. He states all citizens of Denton will benefit from Morris Street being connected between Woodrow Lane and Loop 288. lie added sale of this propertyy (Morrie Street conatruction) will greatly facilitate thia effort also. Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend disposition of 1approximatSuely rveys Abstract, 4b(north ropefrSty east of Woodrow Lane) (D-40). Seconded by He. Cole and carried 6-1. (Mr..Juren voted no.) D. Establish meeting date and tine for work session on policies and procedures. Ah~