HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-19-1985
J"ry COUNCIL
AGENDA
r.t a i b_ r ' T n I'r~ ry M1 'W ~ n t ' V A, i 1Ym W 1 "A ;1 'v k "6 -4
r1 A 1-4 ~7 a 1 sv n° ~ ! ~ia< ya 3 yl i ~ f 7 ;x ~y.
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
• February 19, 1985
Work Session o: the City of Denton City Council or Tuesday,
February 19, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of
the Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
S:30 P.M.
1. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 5252-17
V. A. T. S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Arc 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V. A. T. S.
2. Consider revision and update of the City's four sit..
member election districts (Districts 1, 2, 3, 4) :o
account for annexations.
i 3. Consider setting is time and date for a special meeting
to hold a public hearing and approve an ordinance
revising and updating the City's four single member
districts (Districts 1, 2, 3, 4) to account for
annexations.
4. Receive a status report on Kerley Street bird roost
and consider approval of alternative solutions.
5. Receive an update on the City of Deitton's Affirmative
Action Program.
0. Discussion of City of Denton City Council strategic
plan.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
February 19, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers o' the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7100 p.m.
i
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of January 15, 1985; the Special C311ed
Meeting of January 24, 198S; the Special Called
Meeting of January 261 1985; and the Special Called
Meeting of January 29, 1985.
ry r41 f- A4a "'is x w A Y ~x'= re: Cx r
~I ~ tr. A, 7a
Fety of Denton City Council Agenda
y 9, 1985
Page Two
• 2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager of his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
10.A, 4.B, 4.0. This listing is provided on the Consent
Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to
approval of the ordinance.
1. Bid / 9372 - Power transformer
2. Bid # 9385 - Asphalt distributor
3. Bid 19391 - Loop 288 waterline
4. Bid 0 9314 - Developer/participation streets
Weston Development Corporation
S. Bid 0 9402 - Miscellaneous electrical hard-
ware
6. Purchase Order f 66837 to Niedermeyer-Martin
Company in the amount of $31,551.24
7. Purchase Order g 67026 to AMP Special
Industries in the amount of $16,2SS.00
B. Plats and replats:
1. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Claude Hill Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
24 Approval of final re plat of the Allan
Estates Mobile Hone Park. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the John A. Hann's Addition, Block 1, Lot IA
(formerly King Addition). (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of preliminary and final re plat of
tfihe Wo M. Wriight. Addition, Block 2, Lot 3R.
(Thi Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends Approvals)
ti J'y 6 ..4 H r " t 2,. 3" t Nr rep n9i~Er
'City of Denton City Council Agenda
`February 19, 1985
` Page Three
• C. Change Orders:
1. Consider approval of Change Order 01 with
Hogan and Resor on the design phase of the
high service pumping facility to serve the
higher elevations of the northwest Denton
area. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
3. Appearance by Mr. Carl Young requesting approval for
tie use of Fred Moore Park on June 19, 20, 21 and 22
for the purpose of a Juneteenth celebration, a waiver
of the fee for the use of the park and an extension of
the curfew to 12:00 midnight.
4. Appearance by a representative of the North Texas
State University Student Association requesting
approval to collect contributions for the United Way
from City of Denton streets and medians.
S. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately
31.027 acres of land beginning at the southwest corner
of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (FM 2181) (A-8). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
6. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately
5.70 acres beginning north of Highway 380 West and
adjacent and west of Masch Branch Road (A-9). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
7. Adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing a
tract of land consisting of approximately 131.761
acres beginning south of Robinson Road and east of
Nowlin Road (A-10). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
8. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 112 acres beginning west of
1-35 N service road, north of Marshall Road, and east
of the Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad (A-12). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
9. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1702. This is the petition of Charles S.
waatKins representing B. L. Archer (owner)
requesting the establishment of a planned
O development district (PD) under article 11 of the
Denton Zoning Ordinance in respect of a tract of
31.029 acres of land situated at the southwestern
corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane
intersection. If a ppproved, the planned
developa ant distr:c:~. (PD) will perait the
following davelopment'v:
Ik .i h ~7 S ' l 1 LF,:'~ 1~ ~ ~ r ^yk tir ~ t'✓~ ~ ~ p~t1 ~ua r `.6 r J ~iS .xt,`:"1 "'r ~tLJd da~S:, r.,r
x a.,
'City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19 1985
• Page Four
17 acres of single family housing (SF-6) with a
density of approximately S.6 units per acre
10 acres of multi-family cluster housing
with a density of 17 units per acre
4 acres of general retail and general service
ty a uses.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
B. Z-1706. This is the petition of Myers
eIf'v Tpment Corporation requesting the
establishment of planned development (PD) zoning
on a 131.7 a;re trace of land located on the east
side of Nowlin Road approximately 2,200 feet
south of Robinson Road. If approved, the planned
development will permit the following land uses:
Multi -Family-a proximately 221 units on 12.3 acres
with a density of 18 units per acre
Cluster Homes - approximately 2S2 units on 42 acres
with a donsity of 6 units per acrow
Neighborhood Shopping - 2.6 acres
Single Family - approximately 6 units on 2.1 acres
. with a density of 3 units per acre
Patio Homes - approximately 82 units on 11.6 acres
with a density of 6.5 units per acre
Estate Homes - approximately 4S units on 15.1 acres
with a density of 3 units per acre
Two Family Garden Homes - approximately 60 units on
9.2 acres with a density of 6.S units per acre
Golf Course - approximately 34.4 acres
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
C. Z-1709. This is the petition of Burke
nngineering, representing Tri-Steel Structures
requesting the establishment of office (0j
district zoning classification on a tract of five
(S) acres of land situated west of and abutting
Masch Branch Road and north of U. S. Highway 380
and more fully described as lot 1, block 1,
Tri-Steel Headquarters Addition. If approved,
the site may be used for any type of development
permitted in an office district by the Denton
Zoning Ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
D. Z-1712. This is the petition of Walter DeRonde
requesting the establishment of light industrial
(LI) zoning on a 111.7 acre tract in the-B.B.B.
and C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 141, and the
R. Whitlock Survey, Abstract 1403. The tract is
ZYa i r+R ~nii, t -i 3- y I @t iJ Ar i M Y,
x } xY,. ~w ,2_ z. ,1 5 •~Y fir. Cx ^S4eud} ~~'rt City'of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 198S
• Page Five
located north of Westgate Hospital and Medical
Center, approximately 600 feet west of the
Interstate Highway 3S north service road, and
adjacent and east of the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railroad. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
B. Z-1715. This is the petition of Charles Watkins,
representing the owners, requesting a change in
the current zoning classification from
agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD)
district on a tract of approximately 37.6 acres
situated west of and abutting Loop 288 and north
of and abutting Audra Lane and more fully
described in the R. B. Longbottom Survey,
Abstract #A-77S. If approved, the planned
development (PD) will permit the following mixed
uses on the site:
10.7 acres of two family residential (2-F)
with a density of 11.2 units per acre
9.8 acres of multi-family housing
with a density of 20 units per acre
• 4.1 acres of warehouses
6.7 acres of retail/offices and showrooms
4.4 acres of offices and warehouses
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
F. Z-1719. This is the petition of T. E. Uland
requesting a change in zoning from the
multi-family (MF-1) district to the office (0)
zoning classification at S01 Parkway Street. The
lot is located at the southwest corner of Parkway
Street and Carroll Boulevard and is more
particularly described as lot 8, block 2, of the
first Amendment to the First Installment of the
Carroll Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends denial.)
G. Z-1722. This is the petition of Robert J.
caraway, represented by Charles Watkins,
requesting a change in the current zoning
classification from agricultural (A) to planned
development (PD) district on a tract of 6.34
acres situatedi south of U. S. Highway 380 in the
vicinity of Cindy Lane and shown in the William
Bryan Survey, Abstract 0149, City of Denton. If
approved, the proposed planned development will
permit the following type of uses:
2617 acres of multifamily apartment development
with a density of 20 units per acre
4.17 acres of commercial type uses
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
~x rc r1 ,f r r ! r .f 1 R .'k~ 1 nY t Sv eSi h.. 1 1 r Pys y~ s ✓ ~r r r ~t
~1'Y,r rle §1 nAn n, r t Yn E 1 ~J„ ~ e
}
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
• Page Six
H. Z-1724. This is the petition of David Spalding,
re resenting Real-Tech, requesting a change in
zoning from the single family (SF-10) district to
the planned development (PD) classification on a
19.8 acre tract in the R, Beaumont Survey,
Abstract 31. The property is located on the east
side of Hinkle Drive appproximately 800 feet north
of University Drive (il. S. Highway 380). If
approved, the planned development will permit the
developmant of a retirement campus with the
following land uses:
Single Family Attached - 67 units on 9.S acres
with a density of 7 units per acre
Multi-Family - 183 units on S.7 acres
with a density of 32 units per acre
Health Care Facility - 60 bed facility on 1.3 acres
(The Planning and Zoning Cv!amission recommends
approval.)
1. Hold a public: hearing to consider an ordinance
amending Article 26 of Appendix B-Zoning of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton to
provide for referral and review of the Planning
and Zoning Commission's recommendation to deny a
request for a change in zoning to the City
Council. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance amending Article 26
of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton.
J. Hold a public hearing to consider an ordinance
repealing Article 10 of Appendix B-Zoning of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton;
enacting a new Article 10 to provide for the
issuance of specific use permits; providing for a
penalty in the maximum amount of $1,000 for
violation thereof; providing for a severability
clause, and providing for an effective date.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
11 Adoption of an ordinance repealing Article
10 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton and
enacting a new Article 10.
X. Hold As public hearing to consider an ordinance
amending Article 12 of Appendix B-Zoning of the
Code of 40rdinances of the City of Denton to
yy ";~S Amy n' 'las S L f A7''v tiM r rv n
A y? ~ ne t w 7 h~~ 1 f G 5 r Y}+4 ~t d i~i'+ J. rr ~ A t F'd Y< 31
j,ny Kt a Si-. r Y,nna r Y;. e i t~ 2. r r n`. a 2 1 e' i `.a F'~ r ` M "a r r ,~iL 9a Y~~a
rL Y~. r . I i r
r
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
• Page Seven
provide for an amended definition of
"Kindergarten or Nursery"; declaring all existing
kindergarten or nursery facilities legal uses;
and providing for an effective date. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance amending Article 12
of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton.
10. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing
for an effective date.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements;
• providin for the expenditure of funds therefore;
and providing for an effective date.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
t a expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exem{ting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids; and providing for an effective
date.
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
proposed pro rata and oversize agreement with
Greenway Plaza (Tony Raposa, owner and/or his
assigns) for a new 12" water, line from Thunder-
bird Street south along IH-35 service road to
University Drive approximately 1900 feet and
connecting to the existing 12" water line on the
south side of University Drive. (The Public
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
8. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
participation in a water shed environmental
assessment study with the North Central Texas
.Council of Governments and six metroplex
. utilities. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
.lf w N < III K d V ~iV " Y f.
1 d 1 W H
1' ( hhh"` 1 M 1 Y' a
1
"City of Denton City Council Agenda
14obruary 19, 198S
Page Eight
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Article III, Section 4.09, extensions
of water and sewer mains, sub-section G, service
from existing substandard size lines. (The
Public Utilities Board and the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend approval.)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance calling a
street bond election for the City of Denton to be
held March 23, 198S,
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance calling and
ordering an election for the City of Denton for
the purpose of electing four Councilpersons for
places 10 2, 3, and 4 to be held on April 6, 1985.
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
contract between the City of Denton and Charles
Willis and Associates. (The Airport Advisory
Board recommends approval.)
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending and
reenacting in its entirety Article III of Chapter
18 of the Code of Ord.tnan of the City of
• Denton establishing a Polii_a Reserve Force;
providing for manner of appointment, minimum
qualifications and status of Police Reserve
Officers; repealing all ordinances in conflict
herf:with; and declaring an effective date.
11. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution approvinS the
submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for
a Juvenile Police Officer.
B, Consider approval of a resolution a pproving the
submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for
the city's Crime Prevention Program,
C, Consider approval of a resolution to amend the
Fox-Sl lease at the Denton Municipal Airport.
(The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.)
D. Consider approval of a resolution approving plans
and specifications for the Fox-S1 hangar, (The
Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.)
3. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing
aembers of the City of Denton Police Reserve
Torce,
'a vti~a
Vtf
If F, 1
4City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
• Page Nine
12. Consider revisions to the FY 85 Capital Improvoments
Plans (Utility Department). (The Public Utilities
Board recommends approval.)
13. Consider authorizing the use of explosives for
blasting at the new landfill site.
14. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
15. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the '-day of 1985 ato' clock
(p.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
1648C
Mi tFh :S y >~..e a 4 j r P+ id-«t ~ 3Sr' 1 YY i, 9 * t r;, K +q a
1. a~ 1; (•r4 h ,.r Cl r ~ + ^Z, ey sr r r i~'•i~ K ''f r .S?: S1I~ ~f ~ .:T ~r . r~!~ n
• AGENDA ADDENDUM
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
February 19, 1985
1. Appearance by representatives of the North Texas State
Fair Association to present an update report on the
possibility of development of a North Texas State
Arena and Exposition Center,
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hal'. of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the rA~ day of 'Z -0 1985 at all IT o' clock
(DM. P. m.)
CITY SECRETARY
g v 7 ~ :1. 1 e ~ A f
AGENDA ADDENDUM
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
February 19, 1985
1. Appearance by representatives of the North Texas State
Fair Association to present an update report on the
possibility of development of a North Texas State
Arena and Exposition Center.
i
I
j
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted or, the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, J
on the day of _ 1985 at o'clock 1
(a.m.) (p.m.)
i
I
CITY SECRETARY j
i
*.P )•.g p n r t s i ~ S fIa. 1 R a ~r '4 ~ ~ s ~ timtl e i i'- t.~ r _d i4
r ni a r t .ysE , m t e * +l 7n a` (r
February 19, 1965
Denton City Council
Dear Councilman:
The purpose of this status report is ti update the City
Council on our progress and intention to pursue the development
of the North Texas Exposition Center. This multi-purpose facili-
ty will be utilized by the North Texas State Fair Association as
well as other community organizations to produce events, shows,
festivals, etc., whi:h will bonefit the economic base of the
greater Denton area.
It is our intent to keep you informed of our progress as we
further develop plans for a specific site, facility design, and
funding avenues. We intend to request City Council consideration
of allocation and dedication of U-e presently uncollected hotel
and motel occupancy tax for use in the development of this impor-
tant endeavor. We plan to appear before you again with more
complete information regarding the final site, development sched-
ule, and a plan for funding.
Sincerely,
Board of Directors
North Texas State Fair Association
5 ' Krr 7}' A'.,y y 3'4I rY 1~a yr
n
NORTH TEXAS EXPOSITION CENTER
STATUS REPORT
TO
DENTON CITY COUNCIL
February 19, 1985
Submitted by `
Board of Directors
North Texas State Fair Association
1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F r Y i rc ti w. g :1,x aC kr.'p' ym > 4H Mks b,
1985 Officers
North Texas State Fair Association
James Roden - President
Weldon Burgoon - Vice President
Roy Crawford, Sr. - Vice President
Scott Ford - Vice President
Bob Powers - Vice President
Robert Harris - Treasurer
Melvin Haisler - Secretary
1985 Board of Directors
North Texas State Fair Association
James Roden Mark Hannah, Jr.
Weldon Burgoon Tom Harris
Roy Crawford, Sr. Dale Irwin
Scott Ford T. J. Jones
Bob Powers Troy LaGrone
Robert Harris R. D. Martin
Melvin Haisler Jerry Mohelenitzky
Bill Allen Bill Moore
Miller Davidge, Jr. Kathy Orr
Johhny Glenn Rob Robinson
i
n. 'Ms +f4' tr r;N 'n email rr MF o4. „ n r ryn., r 1 ♦ 5 y d e;- ra w
h 1 :r rat r F t. e.f
NORTH TEXAS EXPOSITION CENTER
STATUS REPORT
February 19, 1995
Preliminary Feasibility Study
I. Goals and Objectives
A. Provide an annual fair for the benefit of the community,
youth, and agriculture,
Be Provide facilities throughout the year for activities
that will benefit the community.
II. Pu' oss of Study
Determine the feasibility of a multipurpose facility
capable of accommodating large numbers of people and
vehicular traffic.
III. Analysis
A, Market Study and Analysis
Market Area
The market area is divided into two main segments. The
first is the spectator segment, This segment includes people
who attend functions for entertainment and recreational purposes
in a solely spectator role. The second segment is made up of the
physical users of the facilities= e.g, livestock exhibitors,
horse show contestants.
Tho market area for the spectator segment is made up of
Denton and the fourteen surrounding counties. A realistic at-
tendance draw would be within a 60-70 mile radius of Denton, (See
Map 1), This would include the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan
area and the major cities surrounding Denton,
1
t ' ~ r'} fr ~ k 'f ° P~ f r i t
77
OKLA ww ~f nwll
IIfM
vt ,
U I t♦t
CLAY «•M •1• lam"
! r ~ luh R-~, J ` GS
of v 6 stltl
I , I I y u M r, GC OKd • t- a ro I'
t It +
x -1,
t t I Ja„ ' •1NIn
n1Ma OV . of f
it ~ t ~ ~ ' , Ilf
N N
It
North Market AEea" i
CWI
JACK ` { MRft NT u p T
I tifw t
~f ~ I fMf t I ~ \ ♦ 1 .t•. ly
71 ~ r. f~ n ,
aM 1• n l r , s ti~h r fl •
Fr ♦ r
,she
Upf is
1 D FW i South Market Area 'tl
r p >w s . t
U
PA. O P tT0 Yif• w r l 1+
1,.. lV-s i ' ,w
ri t. . ~ r •
R r
a i Aj t ~ o •
al If w r fn .QOM' + v ltw 1 rf n ko+ x I' F MAN
q In
I+aM ~ ~ f 11
r
t' " `M)OD"...'f 1 ~ r p t , Nw , ii ~ An ~ Mfl1
/ 1 1 VL 7 , , II .w It1P ltd t t b o V EAN1
~ _ , t A'Itf s f
Ityll♦Ift lyll cp,,i q_ ` ~ ♦ , n wrr.~. ' / R.r•r ti ''7 p
Mr••r♦ 711 ' . N I,.t M I n s , . ♦~I Ma
lnfll•4 ' •SlpMmae • ' 1 .i „ s i tlal',r~•. r , VARRO t..A f p r
li a V ~ ~ GwnM • ~ ' /lMf f cK I Wlllf°
It ERA ► 1♦ IAVt ♦ff
• is „ 7 Cale
• N r a MILL
r ♦ NsftAr rt..., Intl
CIO
fyr♦ • tyl BOSOI~E No
1 N hnA1M ~ / t
! ~m ► fY♦ I N M
A I It
t 6 f 17
•rf ~ 1 n t,lnatru
, ~ f t I
•nlh w r l+,.a n ? K `"1 r-, q ' y • REE9t NE
♦ 1 r, f I. ry. 1 1
f
33
qq~
HAW OI/ V r --N t tfhlf/ • LI EStONE y ' ; ' r H
AtM t;~~ ♦ ♦ t 1 MN I 4~
'r' „ ♦M 1411
' • Ita ~ rw • Me4 N tiY
MILLS 1 * 1.EN
adlN ' CCpYEIL ►r 1 I Ir f • a% 7 r, ~1 ~ .r.r. N
1 1ti t f7d1v 1 a • PALLS
1 II
LA 1 ASA9"nRaa 1 Imo. I a ad N , `a.sf
wu , r . tw •Y I LEO
2J• .
1~ !11 ~ ~ ' s•, • • tom. ► k14Ntl 1~J ! /rlf•1 1.. ,a t °
cwra I \ 1rMt r
' •..4w ~0'I t M . _ ,r 44 RO T ON INN+Ir 'wn~
1.
The market area for the physical user segment is Texase the
surrounding states, and portions of the continental United
States. The Denton area is a transportation "crossroads" for the
southwestern United States. The interstate highways and the
regional airport make the area readily accessible to potential
physical users.
Market Demand
The demand in the spectator segment will be influenced by
the population of the market area. The 1985 population estimate
for the market area is 3,446,126. The majority of the current
1984 population (2,921,850) is located in the four-county area of
Dallas, Denton, Collin, and Tarrant. Significant population
growth is projected for the market area during the next ten
years. (See Table 1). It is assumed that entertainment facili-
ties in the market area north of the metroplex will be in gre4 ter
demand, due to the lack of supply. The increasing population
growth combined with good marketing should increase the initial
market demand.
The estimated spectator draw for the North Texas Exposition
Center is 138,200 annually. (See Table 2). This is less than 5%
i
of the 1985 population estimate for the total market area and
20.5= of the population estimate for the north market area. The
Center will draw a greater percentage of spectators from outside
the metroplex area, particularly north of Dallas/Fort Worth.
The potential physical user demand is identified as all
avents that require a large amount of space to function. This
includes livestock shows, rodeos, concerts, trade shows, etc.
(See Table 2 and Appendix 1 & 2 for a partial list).
3
1S1 FQ4 t d~ A i cif,: p', 4 t ! .1 s Y' S~•S -tit Y '1 -
Table 1: Population Estimates in Market Area by County.
Total Market Area
1980 1984 1985 1990 1995
COLLIN COUNTY 1449576 189,800 182,985 231,607 278,658
COOKE COUNTY 27,656 NA 29,732 31,964 33,985
DALLAS COUNTY 1,556090 10011750 10679,074 1,811,429 1,916,758
DENTON COUNTY 143026 192,200 180,428 227,453 2709072
ELLIS COUNTY 59,743 69,600 67,199 759586 850728
FANNIN COUNTY 24,285 NA 25,241 26,235 27,685
GRAYSON COUNTY 89,796 NA 95,666 101,921 105,656
HUNT COUNTY 55,248 64,550 57,768 60,404 63,430
JACK COUNTY 70408 NA 71767 80145 81463
JOHNSON COUNTY 679649 829500 78,717 91,598 104,030
MONTAGUE CNTY 179410 NA 18,310 19,258 20000
PARKER COUNTY 440609 54,050 47,700 51,007 52,981
ROCKWALL CNTY 14,528 19,700 18,472 23,487 26,665
TARRANT COUNTY 86o,88o 1,018,100 9270213 998,659 10044,737
WISE COUNTY 26,575 34,250 29,851 33,532 37,577
Total 299959303 3,446,126 3,7920285 40769725
D/FY i South Market Area
1980 1984 1985 1990 1995
DALLAS COUNTY 1,556,390 1,701,750 1,679,074 11811,429 1,916,758
TARRANT COUNTY 86o,88o 1,018,100 927,213 998,659 11044,737
JOHNSON COUNTY 67,649 82,500 78,717 91,598 104,030
ELLIS COUNTY 59,743 699600 67,199 75,586 85,728
ROCKWALL CNTY 14,528 19,700 18,472 23,•187 269665
Total 2,559,190 2,891,650 29770,675 3000,759 3,17?,918
North Market Area
1980 1984 1985 1990 1995
COLLIN COUNTY 144,576 1890800 182,988 231,607 278,658
COOKE COUNTY 27,656 NA 29,732 31,964 33,985
DENTON COUNTY 143026 1920200 180,428 227,453 270,072
FANNIN COUNTY 24,285 NA 25,241 26,235 27,685
GRAYSON COUNTY 899796 NA 95,666 101,921 105,656
HUNT COUNTY 55,248 64,550 57,768 60,404 63,430
JACK COUNTY 7008 NA 7,767 89145 8,463
MONTAGUE CNTY 17,410 NA 18010 196258 20000
PARKER COUNTY 440609 540050 471700 51,007 520981
VISE COUNTY 26,575 34,250 29,851 33,532 37,577
rrrrrr .r..rr rr..r♦
Total 436,113 675,451 791,526 898,807
Sourest 1980, U.S. Censuaj 1984, NCTCOOI 1985-1995, Texas Depart-
ment of Water Resources.
4
r , } t F 'r ^ t T :x5 R ±1 t 1 • ; r ar ,r~4i . ~ xi.
y r n f h a Y N r C.
y
L
•
t
Table 2: PROJECTED North Texas Exposition Events, Drew, 6 Reve!,ue per, Year,
Estimated Total gat Revenue
Freqenoy Draw per Total % Over- Over- Per
Event Draw night night Event Total
NTSF Events
FAIR 1 30000 30,000 10 3,000 25,000 $25,000
RODEO 4 5,000 209000 20 41000 8,750 35,000
CONCERT 4 5,000 20,000 1 200 59000` 20,000
r
Sub Total 9 70,000 79200 $800000
Livestock & Horse Events
HORSE SHOW-C 4 11200 4,800 50 2,400 79500 $30,000
HORSE SHOW-M 6 500 3,000 5o 10500 500 3,000
BARBELL RACE 2 21400 50 1,200 8,750 17,500
CUTTING HORSE 1 2,50, 2,500 50 1,250 11000 11000
LSTCK SALES 6 500 3,000 25 750 500 3,000
LSTCK AREA 10 300 3,000 5 150 300 3,000
r-r rr.rr
Sub Total 29 18,700 79250 $57,500
Community Events
SPRING FLING 1 20,000 20,000 0 0 0 $0
DISTRICT 4-H 1 10500 1,500 50 750 0 0
YOUTH FAIR 1 10500 11500 25 375 0 0
Sub Total 3 23000 1,125 $0
Other Events
FRATERNITY 4 11000 4,000 0 0 11000 $4,000
LION CAR SHOW 1 1,500 11500 20 300 10000 19000
DOG SHOP! 1 31000 3,000 50 1,500 11000 12000
CONV RODEO 2 10000 21000 75 10500 500 19000
TRADE SHOW 2 500 10000 75 750 11000 2,000
AUCTION 4 500 2,000 5 100 500 20000
CLUV RECEPTION 10 200 2,000 0 0 500 5,000
COLISEUM ARENA 3 20000 6,000 5 300 11000 3,000
EXHIBIT HALL 6 500 3,000 5 150 500 3,000
MEETING RMS 20 100 2,000 0 0 250 5,000
r--rr- ----r rrrr..
Sub Total 53 26,500 4,600 $271000
TOTAL 94 1389200 15 20,175 $164,500
223 222292 20332 72222 222222
% of Population from Total Market Area 4.01% .59%
% of Population from North Market Area 4 20.46% 2.99%
5
L
p ' g- t^f. r r iw ,wr r e .v ~r r y~ b q ,fir e ti i ":d 8n ! _ i .a fi " 7,171
ti t i s} S I r. 4 r r r r P% f~
a w .t r ~ i~.J~
f . r
Market, Supply of Facilities
There are no exposition centers in the market area north of
the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. An exposition center is defined
as facility capable of hosting livestock shows, trade shows,
rodeos, banquets, festivals, conventions, horse shows, concerts,
etc. Arena facilities currently available and rumored to be
planned are inadequate for multipurpose uses.
Competitive Environment
The spectator segment is highly competitive due to the vast
number of entertainment opportunities in the metroplex area. The
portion of the market area that does not include the metroplex is
less competitive. There are fewer exposition events in this
area. Transportation distances would be shortened for a center
located in Denton.
Product Design and Mix
The frequency and types of events should be designed for a
variety of spectators and users. A true multipurpose center is
not dependent on one user segment.
B. Estimated Physical Needs
The proposed plan for the North Texas Exposition Center is
divided into three general categoriess 1) Covered arena and
private club, 2) Livestock exposition facility, and 3) Exhibit
and banquat hall,
11 Arena and clubs 270' X 250' clear span
Arenas apex. 110' X 250'
7,500 seats
6
f^i.
0 ':t x ~.w pH A t
Y i,i r "1 x 7~. iA
i•
r
Club: 10,000 SF
21 Livestock area: appx. 500' X 300'
seats 500-700
arena 110' X 250'
31 Exhibit hall: appx. 150' X 200'
banquet facilities
4) 3,500 parking spaces
51 Total area: 125 acres
C. Physical and Location Analysis
Site recommendations include good visiblity, accessibility
to utilities, and proximity to major traffic arteries. The site
should lend itself to good drainage and present the opportunity
for attractive landscaping.
F. Economic Activity and Financial Analysis
Estimated Economic Activity
Four categories of North Texas Exposition Events are pro-
jected. Each type of event is expected to bring people into the
community and generate economic activity. The 94 events are
projected to draw approximately 1388200 in attendance, both phys-
ical and spectator users. (See Table 2). It is estimated that
these users will spend $10.00 each during each one-day visit.
i
Approximately 14.61 of those individuals attending events will
stay overnight in the community and will spend an additional
$40.00 each during their visit. It is generally accepted that
each dollar spent in a community will turn over seven (7) times
(Texas Tourist Development Agency= therefore, it is estimated
that $150323,000 per year in economic activity will be generated
by the North Texas Exposition Center. (See Table 3).
7
uG. a va 4^ tin F 5. 7 7f"r
yy 4
Table 3: Estimated Economic Activity (Dollar Turnover) for the
Community.
$/day Total $ Turn- Total
over Spent
Total Draw $ 138,200 $ 10.00 $ 1,382,000 7 $ 91674,000
Overnight 2n,175 40.00 807,000 7 5,649,000
Total Economic Activity $ 15,323,000
Estimated Cash Flow
The North Texas State Fair (NTSF) events are those in which
the North Texas State Fair Association is directly involved and
will receive a percentage of gate, concession. and rental fees.
The other categories will generate revenue though rental and
usage fees paid to the NTSF Association. (See Table 2).
The NTSF Association will control all facility rental, park-
ing and concessions. The estimated revenues are shown in Table
4. Potential gross revenue is estimated at $226,690. Expenses
have been estimated as a function of gross revenue and salary. A
contingency has been included for expense overruns. The net
operating income for the North Texas Exposition Center is esti-
mated to be $19,882 annually. (See Table 4).
8
I
r Y ...11. {1 ~ nk ti~~f r „ ~i i t.~m ,,"vN o;y' v > eRYkrv r4 KPf • W~M
ilk
Table 4i North Texas Exposition Center Proforma.
Revenue
NTSF Events s Gross Rentals $ 164,500
Parking Fee 4 t/car
1,00 $/car 340550
Concession 1.00 $/person
20 t of gross 2-1t640
r rr r r r
Potential Grose Revenue $ 226,690
Expense
Insurance 5 % of yr revenue $ 118335
utilities 15 % of gr revenue 34,004
Labor 2 @ $ 10,000 20,000
Labor Supv 1 @ $ 15000 15,000
Office Staff 1 @ $ 15,000 15,000
General Mgr 50,000
Fringes 20 ! of gr salary 20,400
Travel 5 • of gr revenue 11,335
Mn/0 r/Equp 5 % of gr revenue 11,335
Contingency 10 % of gr expense 181801
rY
Estimated Expenses $ 206,808
rrr rrrr
Net Operating Income $ 19,882
SUR"ry
This status report has been prepared by the North Texas
State Fair 1985 Board of Directors. The report indicates that at
this time it is feasible to continue to plan with the intent to
construct a multi-purpose exposition osater in the Denton area.
I
9
BB'S ~M I,rFf" 'r4 ~ R «Y- <l 0. . ~5 N.f~ :V Sn F
APPBNDIX 1
Ai•
ra
1984
LIST OF PRESIDENTS AND SECRETARIES OF
TEXAS b NATIONAL PUREBRED LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATIONS
Furnished by Livestock Department, State Fair of Texas
BEEF CATTLE PRESIDENTS
AMERICAN ANGUS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL BRANGUS BREEDERS ASSN.
Dr. Arthur V. Bartenslager, President Glenn Brinkman, President
Box 617 Box 126
Churchville, Virginia 24421 Sisterdale, Texas 78006
TEXAS ANGUS ASSOCIATION TEXAS BRANGUS BREEDERS ASSN.
Glen Hubbard, President Frank Crossen, President
801 W. Moss St. 4600 Republic Bank Tower
Eastland, Texas 76448 Dallas, Texas 75201
SOUTHWESTERN BEEFALO ASSOCIATION PINES b PLAINS BRANGUS ASSOCIATION
Tom Martin, President Eugene T. Adair, President
1320 Cheyenne Drive P. 0. Box 7
Richardson, Texas Weatherford, Texas 76086
BEEFMASTER BREEDERS UNIVERSAL AMERICAN RED BRANGUS ASSOCIATION
Maurice Harrell, President Don Johnson, President
P. 0. Box 925 4-J Ranch
Gonzales, Texas 78629 Brownwood, Texas 76801
AMERICAN BLONDE D'AQUITAINE ASSN, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CHAROLAIS ASSN.
Melfred Carlson, President Roy Prescott, President
Ralph, South Dakota 57650 Route 4
TEXAS BLONDE D'AQUITAINE ASSN. Jerome, Idaho 83338
Andy Anderson, President TEXAS CHAROLAIS BREEDERS ASSN.
4031 Butterfly Court George Marti, President
Houston, Texas 77079 P. 0. Box 661
Cleburne, Texas 76031
AMERICAN BRAHMAN BREEDERS ASSN.
Raymond Long, President NORTH AMERICAN FRENCH CHAROLAIS COUNCIL
P. 0. Box 156 John E, Holdridge, President
Lottie, Louisiana 70756 6112 W. County
Odessa, Texas 79762
TEXAS BRAHMAN ASSOCIATION
Jim Brown, President AMERICAN CHIANINA ASSOCIATIQN
Route 2, Box 2604 Ned Ellis, Chairman of the Board
Belton, Texat 76513 Route 10 Box 98
HEART OF TEXAS BRAHMAN ASSN. Ft. Deposit, Alabama 36032
Barney Allen, President AMERICAN CHIANINA ASSOCIA'T'ION, SOUTHWEST REGION
Route 1, Box 233 C. 0. Richards, President
Franklin, Texas 77856 Drawer H
TEXAS AREA VI GREATER BRAHMAN ASSN. Bronte, Texas 76933
David Westfall, President DEVON CATTLE ASSOCIATION, INC,
6623 Norway Road Gerald A, Engh, M.D,, President
Dallaa, Texas 75230 5922 Jane Way
AMERICAN BRALERS ASSOCIATION Alexandria, Virginia 22310
Richard E, Leigh, Jr., President AMERICAN PELBRIEH ASSOCIATION
Bluiblervilie, Texas 79931 Ma. Dottie Knout, President
Clinton, Louisiana 70722
!,•f/ 1•r l~ ~ ° i ...+.v s.w„ f~., •k i.- d ~i"C
2
BEEP CATTLE PRESIDENTS (Continued)
r
AMERICAN HEREFORD ASSOCIATION AMERICAN POLLED HEREFORD ASSOCIATION
James Grote, President George Wingert, Chmn. of Board
P. 0. Box 457 Box 212
Llano, Texas 78643 Ottawa, Kansas 66067
TEXAS HEREFORD ASSOCIATION TEXAS POLLED HEREFORD ASSOCIATION
Bruce Brandenberger, President Jim Farri,-;ton
V Bar Ranch 101 Green Meadow
Route 10 Box 106 Abilene, Texas 79605
Stanton, Texas' 79782
TEXAS POLL-ETTES
NORTH AMERICAN LIMOUSIN FOUNDAIION Leatha Farrington, President
Jim Davidson, President 101 Green Meadows
f Sheperd, Montana Abilene, Texas 79605
TEXAS LIMOUSIN ASSOCIATION METROPLEX POLLED HEREFORD ASSOCIATION
E. J, Bishop, President Alan Travis, President
P. O. Box 795 Route 1, Box 133
Winters, Texas 79567 Rockwall, Texas 75087
TEXAS LONGHORN BREEDERS ASSN. OF AMERICA TEXAS JUNIOR POLLED HEREFORD ASSOCIATION
Dr. L. V. Baker, Jr., President Tom Stewart, President
Elk City, Oklahoma 73644 P. 0. Box 596
AMERICAN SLACK MAINE-ANJOU ASSOCIATION Cleburne, Texas 76031
Stanton Brown, President RED ANGUS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
P. 0. Box 235 Robert M. Herman, President
Benjamin, Texas 79505 Fayetteville, Tennessee 37334
AMERICAN MAINE-ANJOU ASSOCIATION SANTA GERTRUDIS BREEDERS INTERNATIONAL
David Marold, President Porter Rogers, Jr., President
Westcliffe, Colorado 1300 South Main
Searcy, Arkansas 72143
TEXAS MAINE-ANJOU ASSOCIATION
John Schuessler, President PREMIER SA14TA GERTRUDIS ASSOCIATION
Route 13 Hrs. A. R. Fellrath, President
Llano, Texas 78643 Wagon Wheel Ranch
Route 1, Box 235
MARKY CATTLE ASSOCIATION Kerens, Texas 75144
Don Lebsack, President
Route 1 POLLED SANTA GERTRUDIS ASSOCIATION
Sterling, Colorado 80751 Joe Martinez, Jr., President
P. 0. Box 477
SOUTHWESTERN MARCHIGIANA ASSOCIATION Grande City, Texas 78583
Pat Benner, President
Wharton, Texas 77488 AMERICAN SHORTHORN ASSOCIATION
Ric Hoyt, President
AMERICAN PINZGAUER ASSOCIATION P. 0. Box 647 <
W. J. Sparks, III0 President Burns, Oregon 97720
Box 2058
Victoria, Texas 77901 TEXAS SHORTHORN ASSOCIATION
SOUTHWESTERN PIN2GAUER ASSOCIATION Star Route President
Star Route 3, Box 160
Woodie Talbot, President Cruvei, Texas 79040
Now 8ostnn g Texas 73570
~ fr v r. n i~ rt a'K x w : c: 7 1 'Li.+ s _ Y..l ♦ - .u ,Jc,~! . 1 Ye .A :M ca ~Y Pr 3 x
BEEF CATTLE PRESIDENTS (Continued)
AMERICAN SIMMENTAL ASSOCIATION PAN-AMERICAN ZEBU ASSOCIATION
Richard N•. Tetherow, President Carlos X. Guerra, President
Valentine, Nebraska 69201 P. 0. Box 38
Linn, Texas 78563
TEXAS SIMMENTAL ASSOCIATION
Dr. Joe Prud'homme, President TEXAS S SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS ASSN.
7P Siam,ental Ranch Don C. King, Sec/Gen. Mgr.
106 Surrey Trails 1301 W. Seventh Street
Tyler, Texas 75705 Fort Worth, Texas 76102
EAST TEXAS SIMMENTAL ASSOCIATION TEXAS 6 SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS ASSN.
Hank Longcrier III, President John M. Shelton III, President
Route 2, Box 221 P. 0. Box 43C
Mineola, Texas 75773 Amarillo, Texas 79105
TEXAS SIMBRAH ASSOCIATION
Ken Persyn, President
Castroville, Texas 78009
a* ~e a* e e* e e r e* e e* a****** e* e* e*~ r*~ e* a e e e** e e a
BEEF CATTLE SECRETARIES
AMERICAN ANGUS ASSOCIATION TEXAS AREA VI GREATER BRAHMAN ASSN.
Dr. Richard Spader, Exec. Secy. Lyn W. Lesiker, Secy/Treas.
3201 Frederick Blvd. P. 0. Box 12646
St. Joseph, Missouri Fort Worth, Texas 76116
TEXAS ANGUS ASSOCIATION AMERICAN BRALERS ASSOCIATION
Randall Rostetter, Exec. Secy. Fred Buxter, Secy/Treas.
233 N. Judkins 3355 W. Alabama
Fort Worth, Texas 76111 Houston, Texas 77027
BB:FMASTER BREEDERS UNIVERSAL INTERNATIONAL BRANGUS ASSOCIATION
Gene Kuykendall, Exec. Vice Pres. Jerry Morrow, Exec. Vice President
350 CPM So. Tower, 800 NW Loop 410 9500 Tioga Drive
San Antonio, Texas 78216 San Antonio, Texas 78230
AMERICAN BLONDE D'AQUITAINE ASSN. TEXAS BRANGUS BREEDERS ASSOCIATION
Secretary Trey Kirkpatrick, Execs Secy.
Route B, Box 230 505 E. University Drs, Suite 609
Grandview, Idaho 83624 College Stations Texas 77840
AMERICAN BRAHMAN BREEDERS ASSOCIATION AMERICAN RED BRANGUS ASSOCIATION
Wendell. Schronks Exec. Vice Pros. Charles Carters Secys
1313 La Concha Lane P. 0. Box 1326
Houston, Texas 77054 Austin, Texas 78767
TEXAS BRAHMAN ASSOCIATION PINES b PLAINS BRANGUS BREEDERS
Ma. Margaret Watkins Wanda Brittons Secy.
Star Route, Box 47 P. 0. Box 944
Ganado, Texaa 77962 Gainesville, Texas 76240
HEART OF TEXAS BRAHMAN ASSNS AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CHAROLAIS ASSN,
Karen Harris, Seoy+ Dr. Joe To Garrett, Exec. Vice Pres.
P. 0. Box 69 Ps 0. Box 20247
Rogerss TX 76569 Kansas City$ Missouri 64195
'age 4y
BEEF CATTLE SECRETARIES (Continued)
TEXAS CHAROLAIS ASSOCIATION MARKY CATTLE ASSOCIATION
Bill Arlitt, Jr., Exec. Secy. Bob Laubengayer, Secy.
P. 0. Box 7268 Box M
San Antonio, Texas 78207 Ellsworth, Kansas 67439
AMERICAN CHLANINA ASSOCIATION SOUTHWESTERN MARCHIG LANA ASSOCIATION
Bob Vantrease, President Ms. Katherine Veith, Secy.
P. 0. Box 890 2911 Texas Avenge
.Platte City, Missouri 64079 College Station, Texas 77840
DEVON CATTLE ASSOCIATION, INC. AMERICAN PINZGAUER ASSOCIATION
Martha J. Brooks, Secretary Jim Glenn, Office Manager
5922 Jane Way 123 Airport Road !
Alexandria, Virginia 22310 Amea, Iowa 50010
AMERICAN HEREFORD ASSOCIATION TEXAS PINZCAUER ASSOCIATION
H. H. Dickenson, Jr., Exec. Vice Pres, Dan Anderson, Secretary
P. 0. Box 4059 1600 Promenade
Kansas City, Missouri 64101 Richardson, Texas 75238
TEXAS HEREFORD ASSOCIATION AMERICAN POLLED HEREFORD ASSOCIATION
Jack Chastain, Sec/Mgr. • Dr. T. D. "Dusty" Rich, President
4601 Airport Freeway 4700 E. 63rd Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76117 Kansas City, Missouri 64130
NORTH AMERICAN LIMOUSIN FOUNDATION TEXAS POLLED HEREFORD ASSOCIATION
Gregory L. Martin, Exec. Vice Pres. Ray Mahan, Secy/Treas.
100 Livestock Exch4nge Bldg. P. 0. Box 70
Denver, Colorado 80216 Rio Vista, Texas 75093
TEXAS LIMOUSIN ASSOCIATION RED ANCUS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Lee Pritchard, Secy/Fieldman Lyle V. Springer, Exec. Secy.
P. 0. Box 239 4201 1-35 North
Crowley, Texas 76036 (817/297-2462) Denton, Texas 762U1
TEXAS LONGHORN BREEDERS ASSN. OF AMERICA POLLED SANTA GERTRUDIS BREEDERS ASSN.
Roy D. Gregg Dennis L. Alsup, Secy/Treas.
3701 Airport Freeway P. 0. Box 248
Fort Worth, Texas 76111 Decatur, Arkansas 72722
AMERICAN BLACK MAINE-ANJOU ASSN. PREMIER SANTA GERTRUDIS ASSOCIATION
Charles Langford, Exec. Secy. Bill Barrett, Secretary
6301 Gaston Avenue P. 0. Box 611
Allied Lakewood Bank Center, Suite 645 Valley Mills, Texas 76689
Dallas, Texas 75214
SANTA GERTRUDIS BREEDERS INTERNATIONAL
AMERICAN MAINE-ANJOU ASSOCIATION Dr. W. Ms "Bill" Warren, Exec, Dir,
Steven P. Bernard, Sec/Treas. P. 0, Box 1257
Address Unknown Kingsville, Texas 78363
TEXAS MAINE-ANJOU ASSOCIATION AMERICAN SHORTHORN ASSOCIATION
Edwin Inca, Secy, Dr. Roger 8. Hunsley, Exec. Secy,
Brady Route, Box 17 8288 Hascall
Mason, Texas 76856 Omaha, Nebraska 68124
P^Irc• r "-a r s, > . s'~r; ,mss .t s 'r + o t~. y`w•` :e. ' f..
QS
• PASS
BEEF. CATTLE SECRETARIES (Continued)
s _
TEXAS SHORTHORN ASSOCIATION TEXAS SIMMENTAL ASSOCIATION
Kra. J. 0. Base III, Secretary Warren Garrett, Exec. Secy.
Olton Route 12330 West Avenue, Suite 103
Plainview, Texas 79072 San Antonio, Texas 78216
SUORTHORN LASSIE EAST TEXAS SIMMENTAL ASSOCIATION
Ms. James McAnear, Jr. Pattie Hackemack, Secretary
Star Route 4, Box 29 2734 E1 Tivoli
Clarendon, Texas 79226 Dallas, Texas 75211
AMERICAN SIMMENTAL ASSOCIATION PAN AMERICAN ZEBU ASSOCIATION
Earl B. Peterson, Exec. Secy. Roy G. Martin, Secretary
I Simmental Way 2600 S. Loop West, Suite 310
Bozeman, Montana 59715 Houston, Texas 77054
**~*+r*~*aaaa****a***********a*r***eeaa*eaa*aaa
DAIRY CATTLE - PRESIDENTS
BROWN SWISS CATTLE BREEDERS ASSN. HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Ed Drewitz, President Dr. David G. Smokler, President
Twin Oak Swiss Holtex Farm
RR31 Box 95 Route 1, Box 525
Faribault, Minnesota 55021 Lancaster, Texas 15146
TEXAS BROWN SWISS ASSN.
TEXAS HOLSTEIN ASSOCIATION
William B. Allen, President Harold Wayne Parks
Sunset Canyon Dairy Box 152
Route 1, Box 94 Lingleville, Texas 76461
Dike, Texas 75437
TEXAS JERSEY CATTLE CLUB
AMERICAN GUERNSEY CATTLE CLUB Larry Schendel, President
Russell J. Wirt, President Route 2, Box 123
Route 1, Box 45 Runge, Texas 78151
Lewiston, Minnesota 55952
TEXAS-LOUISIANA MILKING SHORTHORN ASSN.
TEXAS GUERNSEY BREEDERS ASSOCIATION Marshall Earnhart
W. Lee Moore, President Route•2, Box 168A
1104 Praetorian Building Whitesboro, Texas 76273
Dallas, Texas 75201
/e A A# R R** A A A R R* A iY A f A# A A A fl ! !t A* k R A* A A R A tF k R
i
DAIRY CATTLE - SECRETARIES
BROWN SWISS CATTLE BREEDERS ASSN. HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
George Oppesman, Secy/Treas. Zane V. Akins, Exec. Secy.
Box 1036 1 South Main Street
Beloit, Wisconsin 53511 Brattleboro, Vermont 05301
TEXAS BROWN SWISS ASSOCIATION TEXAS HOLSTEIN ASSOCIATION
A. M. Meekma, Exec. Secy. Jack Kay, Exec. Secy.
2908 Partridge Circle Route 1, Box 7
Bryan, Texas 77801 Buda, Texas 78610 (512/293-3821)
AMERICAN GUERNSEY CATTLE CLUB AMERICAN JERSEY CATTLE CLUB
Bernard M. Heisner, Secy/Treas. J. F, Cavanaugh, Secretary
P. 0. Box 27410 2105-J So, Hamilton 'Road
'
Columbus, Ohio 43227 P. O. Box 27310
Columbus, Ohio 43227
'y4 ~:t , y r r.: i, =v.• "~,'n t " i. e., s:" r:' 1i . 4 n = 711, X
Pigs. 6
DAIRY CATTLE - SECRETARIES (Cdhtinued) r
TEXAS JERSEY CATTLE CLUB TEXAS-LA. MILKING SHORTHORN BREEDERS
Roland Reese, Secy/Treas. Jackie Huddleston, Secy.
107 West Tate Route 1
Waco, Texas 76706 Alba, Texas 75410
SHEEP b GOAT - PRESIDENTS
TEXAS DELAINE SHEEP RECORD ASSN. AMERICAN SUFFOLK SHEEP SOCIETY .
Francis E. Kott, President Merle A. Stadeli, President
Kerr Route 11065 Selah Springs Road, N.W.
Fredericksburg, Texas 78624 Silverton, Oregon 97381
AMERICAN RAMBOUILLET SHEEP BREEDERS ASSN. TEXAS SUFFOLK SHEEP ASSN.
Leonard Chapman, President Joe L%l Aise, President
Star Route 1, Box 87A Box 96t-
Bison, South Dakota 57620 Santa Anc . Texas 75878
TEXAS SHEEP 6 GOAT RAISERS' ASSN. AMERICAN ANG(-PA GOAT BREEDERS ASSN.
James F. Wittenburg C. H. Chaney, President
Box 617 Box 165
Rocksprings, Texas 78880 Utopia, Texaf. 78884
SHEEP & GOAT - SECRETARIES
AMERICAN HAMPSHIRE SHEEP ASSOCIATION TEXAS SUFFOLK SHEEP ASSN.
Jim Cretcher, Secy/Treas. Terrye Troxtell, Secy/Treas.
P. 0. Box 345 Route 1, Box 139AL
Ashland, Missouri 65010 Sherman, Texas 75090
AMERICAN RAMBOUILLET SHEEP BREEDERS ASSN. TEXAS SHEEP 6 GOAT RAISERS' ASSN.
Mrs. Lavern McDonald, Secretary William M. Sims, Exec. Secy.
2709 Sherwood Way Box 2290
San Angelo, Teas 76901 San Angelo, Texas 76902
AMERICAN SUFFOLK SHEEP SOCIETY AMERICAN ANGORA GOAT ASSOCIATION
Mrs. Allan Jenkins, Secretary Mary Jane Glasscock, Secretary
1115 No. Hain 0. 0. Box 195
Logan, Utah 84321 Rockspringa, Texas 78880
SWINE PRESIDENTS
TEXAS HAMPSHIRE SWINE BREEDS?S ASSN. TEXAS PORK PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
Bill Scott, President Chuck Real, President
1809 Sylvan Drive Route 2, Box 84B
Abilene, Texas 79603 Marion; Texas 78124
, 5% y e r 1 Vr.. # .~.a1a 'eA to :i c W 11 t P s 42yip
Page 7
SWINE - SECRETARIES
AMERICAN BERKSHIRE ASSOCIATION POLAND CHINA RECORD ASSOCIATION
Jack Wall, Exec. Secy Mike Dunphy, Exec. Secy.
P. 0. Box 747 P. 0. Box B
Lebanon, Indiana 46052 Knoxville, Illinois 61448
CHESTER WHITE SWINE RECORD ASSN. NATIONAL SPOTTED SWINE RECORD, INC.
Daniel Parrish, Exec. Secy. Harry Miller, Exec. Secy.
Box 228 110 West Main Street
Rochester, Indiana 46975 Bainbridge, Indiana 46105
UNITED DUROC SWINE REGISTER AMERICAN YORKSHIRE CLUB, INC.
Gary Huffiggton Glenn Conatser, Exec. Secy.
1803 W. Detveiller Dr. Box 2417
Peoria, Illinois 61615 West LaFayette, Indiana 47906
HAMPSHIRE SWINE REGISTRY TEXAS PORK PRODUCERS' ASSOCIATION
Bob Naylor, Exec. Secy. Kenneth E. Horton, Exec. Vice Pres.
1111 Main Street P. 0. Box 10168
Peoria, Illinois 61606 Austin, Texas 78766
* # * * * * * * * # * # # * * * # # # # # * * * * * * * * * * * * * R * * * * * # * # * #
HORSE - PRESIDENTS
APPALOOSA HORSE CLUB, INC. PALOMINO HORSE BREEDERS OF AMERICA
Kay Payne, President r'verett S. Salley, President
Route 8, Box 295 913 N. 161st Avenue
Conway, South Carolina 29526 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74116
TEXAS APPALOOSA HORSE CLUB TEXAS PALOMINO EXHIBITORS ASSOCIATION
Max Wheeler, President Charlie Sanders
Route 1 Route 1, Box 129A
Gordon, Texas 76453 Celina, Texas 75009
DAL WORTH APPALOOSA CLUB PONY OF AMERICA, INC.
Dr. George Palmer, President Lynn Puffinbarger, President
Route 30 Box 131 Route 2
Burleson, Texas 76028 Cherokee, Oklahoma 73728
ARABIAN HORSE CLUB OF TEXAS AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION
kubert L. Pores, Jr., President Rick Johns, President
Route 3, Box 316 P. 06 Box 698
Plano, Texas 75074 Glendale, Arizona 85311
NORTH TEXAS ARABIAN HORSE CLUB TEXAS QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION
Tom Kindred, President Joe Ba Turner, Jr., President
5115 McKinney P. 0. Box 35085
Dallas, Texas 75205 Dallas, Texas 75235
AMERICAN PAINT HORSE ASSOCIATION LONE ST/a QUARTER HORSE ASSOC LATION
Malcolm Calaway, President Carroll Bunch, President
Route 4, Box 117 Route 1, Box 78A
Victories Texas 77901 Campbell, Texas 75422
TEXAS PAINT;;)RSE ASSOCIATION TRINITY QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATI6N
Diane Hugha6..- President Jim M~!cKay,-President
312 Ridgewood Road 9SR $ox 93
Pt. Worth, Texas 76107 Weatherford, Texas 76086
qy.:
Page '8
.
HORSES - PRESIDENTS (Continued)
NATIONAL CUTTING HORSE ASSOCIATION AMERICAN SADDLE HORSE Bn.EEDF,RS FUTURITY
Tommy Moore, President Jimmy Cates, President OF TEXAS
P. 0. Box 2344 Route 1, Box 117AA
Fort Worth, Texas 76101 Kingsbury, Texas 78638
AMERICAN SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION, INC. SOUTHWEST WALKING HORSE ASSOCIATION
James Akmin, President Ward Steinback, President
929 S. 4th 4525 Catina
Louisville, Kentucky 40203 Dallas, Texas 75229
HORSES - SECRETARIES
APPALOOSA HORSE CLUB, INC. AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION
Charles Nuber, Exec. Secy. Ronald Blackwell, Exec. Secy.
Box 8403 Box 200
Moscow, Idaho 83843 Amarillo, Texas 79605
TEXAS APPALOOSA HORSE CLUB TEXAS QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION
Jim Wales, Secretary Robert C. Henderson, Exec. Director
P. 0. Drawer 340 P.O. Box 35085
Refugio, Texas 78317 Dallas, Texas 75235
ARABIAN HORSE CLUB OF TEXAS LONE STAR QUARTER HORSE ASSN.
Diane Wilterding Ms. Mary Ann Wilson, Secretary
335 N.E. Cindy Lane Route 1, Box 86
Burleson, Texas 76028 Celeste, Texas 75423
NORTH TEXAS ARABIAN HORSE CLUB TRINITY QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION
Nancy Otto, Secretary Lynne Weill, Secretary
7373 Valley View, /3057 Route 19 Box 203
Dallas, Texas 75240 Aubrey, Texas 76227
AMERICAN PAINT HORSE ASSOCIATION NATIONAL CUTTING HORSE ASSOCIATION
Ed Roberts, Exec. Secy. Zack T. Wood, Jr., Secretary
Box 18519 Box 12155
Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Ft. Worth, Texas 76116
PALOMINO HORSE BREEDERS OF AMERICA TEXAS AMERICAN SADDLE HORSE ASSN., INC.
Robert V. Shiflet, Exec. Vice Pres. Mrs. George Roberts, Secy.
P. 0. Box 249 301 Voss Road
Mineral Wells, Texas 76067 Houston, Texas 77024
TEXAS PALOMINO EXHIBITORS ASSN. AMERICAN SADDLE HORSE BREEDERS FUTURITY
Sue Tackel Ma. Marian Cates, Secy. OF TEXAS
Route 1, Box 159 Route 1, Box 117AA
Bridgeport, Texas 76026 Kingsbury, Texas 78638
PONY OF AMERICA CLUB SOUTHWEST WALKING HORSE ASSN.
Phil Porter, Exec. Secy. Martha Holden, Secy/Tress.
P. 0. Box 1447 Route 1, Tox 119RK
Msson City, Iowa 50401 Rockwall, Texas 75087
* R ~ k * # * k # # # # * # A A A * !F !e A # * R * # # # !I k * A * # * # A A A * * * * ~ #
zrP1 ? , t'f +S'.i > >7n r 'r,i~'{':: a> 2 ,xc
Page 9
s _
NATIONAL FIELD REPRESENTATIVES
AMERICAN ANGUS ASSOCIATION BROWN SWISS CATTLE BREEDERS ASSN.
Waymon Ashi,v, Regional Manager. Orville Kurtz, Area Representative
3213 Cher} I L.:ne 8212 Meadow Dr.
Ft. Ws)rth, ''exas 76117 Ft. Smith, Arkansas ?2901
i AMERICAN HEREFORD ASSOCIATION HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN ASSN. OF AMERICA
James F. 'Boyd, Field Rep. Ron Shaver, Manager
30 Fyracaa Circle Area IV Field Division
Abilene, Texas 79604 7650 ?forth Oak Trafficway
AMERICAN POLLED HEREFORD ASSN. Kansas City, Missouri 64118
Jim Harris, Senior Vice Pres. HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN ASSN. OF AMERICA
4700 East 63rd Street Darrell D. Robertson
Kansas City, Missouri 64130 Robertson Dairy, Inc.
AMERICAN POLLED HEREFORD ASSN. Lamar, Missouri 64759
Bill Bunce, Area Coordinator AMERICAN JERSEY CATTLE CLUB
P. O. Box 321 Ken Campbell
Stephenville, Texas 76401 Courtyard i6
SANTA CERTRUDIS BREEDERS' INTERNATIONAL Lafayette, Louisiana 70501
Jim Standridge, Exec. Field Dir.
P. 0. Box 1257
Kingsville, Texas 78363
APPENDIX 2
R _N:. f ¢g 1~ ;R kf .P ;
POSSIBLE SHOWS AND EVENTS
Spring North Texas Barrel Racing Futurity
April
1,200 attend
r Denton High School Rodeo*
April
6,000 attend
Denton Community Theater Flea Market •
March
1,000 attend
Annual PI Kappa Alpha Chili Cook-Off
March.
800 attend
North Texas State Fair +
August
60,000 attend
Lions Club Auto Show •
October
American Quarter Horse Association Show +
October
Spook House •
October
2,000 attend
Texas Pmrk Producers Association
Texas Poultry Federation do Affiliates
Southwest Farm & Ranch ExposKlon do Championship Tractor Pull
March
2,000 registered delegates + public
American Paint Horse Association
National Championship Show
November-December
500 attend
American 3ed Brangus Association
Texas do Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association
March
2,500 attend
1d. V\ l h S T ' 6 ' ..Y KC 8 Y
III T-P
p
Texas Reined Cowhorse Association
May
Denton Annual Spring Fling •
April
30,000 attend
Denton County livestock Association •
Youth Fair do Rodeo
March
3,000 - 4,000 attend
Fall North Texas Barrel Racing Futurity •
September-October
2,000 attend
Antique Auction'
April
Denton Kennel Club '
National Dog Show
May
3,000 attend
4-H Dairy Goat Show •
May
200 attendees
Texas Barrel Racing Association
Fall Futurity at Trader's Village
September
Corsicana wrens have nine shows yearly (did have 13 but lost some) sponsored
by: Corsicana Horse Association
Central Texas Quarter Horse Association
Trinity Quarter Horse Breeders Association
December
C-G Quarter Horse Shows
April
500-600 attend
GP #I do #11 Quarter Horse Shows
May
500 attend
"Nowhere But Texas Mini-Circuit'
Quarter Horse Shows
May
1,000 attend
Quarter Horse Capital Circuit Shows
MO-June
2,000 attend
?J
"TA 777" M
a yyy rs; ° - ^ ri~<t x7 r ~~+.,4 r-~ ziT r'f iy c:n "-rJe `+fl y M
R
! v c ~ 1 ^ i i f y r ins k
iF~ icy ~ r ~ .y~ + Texas Cattle Feeders Association
62nd National Polled Hereford Show do Sale
January
1,700 attend
American Shorthorn Association
January
There are other various livestock shows in the area which could be attracted
to the Denton area. These shows would probably average around 250-500
attendance, depending on the sale.
• indicates events already being held at the North Texas Fairgrounds.
AGhNDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
February 19, 1985
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
February 19, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of
the Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 P.M.
1. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
C. Personnel Udder Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
2. Consider revision and update of the City's four single
member election districts (Districts 1, 29 31 4) to
account for annexations.
3. Consider setting a time and date for a special meeting
to hold a public hearing and approve an ordinance
revising and updating the City's four single member.,
districts (Districts 1, 2$ 9 4) to account for
annexations.
4. Receive a status report on Kerley Street bird roost
and consider approval of alternative solutions.
5. Receive an update on the City of Denton' s Affirmative
Action Program.
6. Discussion of City of Denton City Council strategic
plan.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
February 19, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7: 00 p. +r..
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of January 15, 1985; the Special Called
Meeting of January 24, 1985; the Special Called
Meeting of January 26, 1985; and the Special Called
Meeting of January 29, 1985.
77
City of Denton Ctty Council Agenda
February 190 1985
Page` Two
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will bo strictly on the basis of the
StafE recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
impleh•ent each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
lO.A, 4.B0 4.C). This listing is provided on the Consent
Agenda to allow Cotncil Members to discuss any item prior to
approval of the ordinance.
16 Bid 1 9372 - Power transformer
2. Bid # 9385 - Asphalt distributor
3. Bid 1 9391 - loop 288 waterline
4. Bid # 9314 - Developer/participation streets
Weston Development Corporation
5. Bid 0 9402 - Miscellaneous electrical hard-
ware
6. Purchase Order # 66837 to Niedermeyer-Martin
Company in the amount of $31,551.24
7. Purchase Order 1 67026 to AMP Special
Industries in the amount of $16,255.00
B. Plats and replats:
1. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Claude Hill Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
2. Approval of final replat of the Allan
Estates Mobile Home Park. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the John A. Han,i's Addition, Block 1, Lot lA
(formerly King Addition). (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4, Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the W. W. Wright Addition, Block 2, Lot 3R.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
~ f A, y 4~ r F r ti.. M Y p i }Y -e i e~ r/ r L I I F Z 40
II r
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
Page Three
C. Change Orders:
1. Consider approval of Change Order Il with
Hogan and Rasor on the design phase of the
high service pumping facility to serve the
higher elevations of the northwest Denton
area. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
3. Appearance by Mr. Carl Young requesting approval for
the use of Fred Moore Paik on June 19, 20, 21 and 22
for the purpose of a Juneteenth celebration, a waiver
of the fee for the use of the park and an extension of
the curfew to 12:00 midnight.
4. Appearance by a representative of the North Texas
State University Student Association requesting
approval to collect contributions for the United Way
from City of Denton streets and medians.
5. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing a tract of Ipnd consisting of approximately
31.027 acres of land beginning at the southwest corner
of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (FM 2181) (A-8). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
6. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately
5.70 acres beginning north of Highway 380 West and
adjacent and west of Masch Branch Road (A-9). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
7. Adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing a
tract of land consisting of approximately 131.761
acres beginning south of Robinson Road and east of
Nowlin Road (A-10). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
8. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 112 acres beginning west of
I-35 N service road, north of Marshall Road, and east
of the Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad (A-12). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
9. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1702. This is the petition of Charles S.
Watkins representing B. L. Archer (owner)
requesting the establishment of a planned
development district (PD) under article 11 of the
Denton Zoning Ordinance in respect of a tract of
31.027 acres of land situated at the southwestern
corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane
intersection. if a~proved, the planned
developpmment district PD) will permit the
following developments:
r "
t
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
Page Four
17 acres of single family housing (SF-6) with a
density of approximately 5.6 units per acre
10 acres of multi-family cluster housing
with a density of 17 units per acre
4 acres of general retail and general service
ty a uses.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
B. Z-1706. This is the petition of Myers
eIF veIopment Corporation requesting the
establishment of planned development (PD) zoning
on a 131.7 acre tract of land located on the east
side of Nowlin Road approximately 2,200 feet
south of Robinson Road. If approved, the planned
development, will permit the following land uses:
Multi-Family - approximately 221 units on 12.3 acres
with a density of 18 units per acre
Cluster Homes - approximately ZS2 units on 42 acres
with a density of 6 units per acre
Neighborhood Shopping - 2.6 acres
Single Family - approximately 6 units on 2.1 acres
with a density of 3 units per acre
Patio Homes - approximately 82 units on 12.6 acres
with a density of 6.5 units per acre
Estate Homes - approximately 45 units on 15.1 acres
with a density of 3 units per acre
Two Family Garden Homes - approximately 60 units on
9.2 acres with a density of 6.S units per acre
Golf Course - approximately 34.4 acres
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
C. Z-1709. This is the petition of Burke
n~gi'neering, representing Tri-Steel Structures,
requesting the establishment of office (0)
district zoning classification on a tract of five
(5) acres of land situated west of and abutting
Masch Branch Road and north of U. S. Highway 380
and more fully described as lot 1, block 1,
Tri-Steel Headquarters Addition. If approved,
the site may be used for any type of development
permitted in an office district by the Denton
Zoning Ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
D. Z-17:2. This is the petition of Walter DeRonde
requesting the establishment of light industrial
(LI) zoning on a 111.7 acre tract in the B.B.B.
and C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 141, and the
R. Whitlock Survey, Abstract 1403. The tract is
>y ty s - 1,
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
Page Five
located north of Westgate Hospital and Medical
Center, approximately 600 feet west of the
Interstate Highway 35 north service road, and
adjacent and east of the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railroad. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
S. Z-1715. This is the petition of Charles Watkins,
representing the owners, requesting a change in
the current zoning classification from
agricultural (Ail to the planned development (PD)
district on a tract of approximately 37.6 acres
situated west of and abutting Loop 188 and north
of and abutting Audra Lane and more fully
described in the R. B. Longbottom Survey,
Abstract /A-775. If approved, the planned
development (PD) will permit the following mixed
uses on the site:
10.7 acres of two family residential (2-F)
with a density of 11.2 units per acre
9.8 acres of multi-family housing
with a density of 20 units per acre
4.1 acres of warehouses
6.7 acres of retail/offices and showrooms
4.4 acres of offices and warehouses
(The N) vriing and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
F. Z-1719. This is the petition of T. from Ulthe
requesting a change in zoning
multi-family (MF-1) district to the office (0)
zoning classification at 501 Parkway Street. The
lot is located at the southwest corner of Parkway
Street and Carroll Boulevard and is more
particularly described as lot 8, block 29 of the
First Amendment to the First Installment of the
Planning and Zoning
Carroll r
recommends deniale)
Commission re
G. Z-1722. This is the petition ofs Robert J.
araway, represented by Watkins,
requesting a change in the current zoning
classification from agricultural (A) to Planned
development (PD) district on a tract o 6.34
acres situated south of U. S. Highway 380 in the
vicinity of Cindy Lane and shown in the William on. Bryan Survey, ArotraSed fplannedtdevelopment will
approved, the p P }~O of uses:
permit the following type
2.17 acres of multi-family apartment development
with a density of 24 units per acre
4.17 acres of commercial type uses
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
Page Six
H. Z-1724. This is the petition of David Spalding,
representing Real-Tech, requesting a change in
zoning from the single family (SF-10) distric'. to
the planned development (PD) classification ►n a
19.8 acre tract in the R. Beaumont Survey,
Abstract 31. The property is located on the east
side of Hinkle Drive approximately 800 feet forth
of University Drive (U. S. Highway 380). If
approved, the planned development will permit the
development of a retirement campus witft the
following land uses:
Single Family Attached - 67 units on 9.5 acres
with a density of 7 units per acre
Multi-Family - 183 units on 5.7 acres
with a density of 32 units per acre
Health Care Facility - 60 bed facility on 1.3 al:res
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
i
1. Hold a public hearing to consider an Irdinance
amending Article 26 of Appendix B-Zonin; of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of renton to
provide for referral and review of the Planning
and Zoning Commission's recommendation to deny a
request for a change in zoning to the City
Council. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance amending Article 26
of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton.
J. Hold a public hearing to consider n ordinance
repealing Article 10 of Appendix B-Z +ning of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton;
enacting a new Article 10 to pro+ide for the
issuance of specific use permits; providing for a
penalty in the maximum amount of $1,000 for
violation thereof; providing for a severability
clause, and providing for an effective date.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance resealing Article
10 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City rf Denton and
enacting a new Article 10.
I
K. Hold a public hearing to consider an ordinance
amending Article 12 of Appendix 'B-Zoning of the
Code of Ordinances of the Citt of Denton to
I
I
i
r~
~ yrp .J v .I
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1965
Page Seven
provide for an amended definition of
"Kindergarten or Nursery"; declaring all existing
kindergarten or nursery facilities legal uses;
and providing for an effective date. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance amending Article 12
of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton.
10. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing
for an effective date.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements;
providin for the expenditure of funds therefore;
and providing for an effective date.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids; and providing for an effective
date.
U. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
proposed pro rata and oversize agreement with
Greenway Plaza (Tony Raposa, owner and/or his
assigns) for a new 12" water line from Thunder-
bird Street south along iH-35 service road to
University Drive approximately 1900 feet and
connecting to the existing 12" water line on the
south side of University Drive. (The Public
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
participation in a water shed environmental
asses3ment study with the North Central Texas
Council of Governments and six me:troplex
utilities. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
r
w ~
it r 1
f
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
Page Bight
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Article III, Section 4.09, extensions
of water and sewer mains, sub-section G, service
from existing substandard size lines. (The
Public Utilities Board and the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend approval.)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance calling a
street bond election for the City of Denton to be
held March 23, 1985.
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance calling and
ordering an election for the City of Denton for
the Plac~su 1, 2 3f and electing 4 to be held on April for
b 1985
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
contract between the City of Denton and Charles
Willis and Associates. (The Airport Advisory
Board recommends approval.)
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending and
reenacting in its entirety Article III of Chapter
18 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton establishing a Police Reserve Force;
providing for manner of appointment, minimum
qualifications and status of Police Reserve
Officers; repealing all ordinances in conflict
herewith; and declaring an effective date.
11. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution approving the
submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for
a Juvenile Police Officer.
B. Consider approval of a resolution approving thr.
submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for
the city's Crime Prevention Program.
C. Consider approval of a resolution to amend the
Fox-51 lease at the Denton Municipal Airport.
(The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.)
D. Consider approval of a resolution approving plans
and specifications for tt..: Fox-51 hangar. (The
Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.)
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing
members of the City of Denton Polite Reserve
Force.
r s ' .S: `..«r .-rhr
~ ~=n '1 ' ~a 1 c1T a A ti,r C n
1
a
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 19, 1985
Page Nine
12. Consider revisions to the FY 85 Capital Improvements
Plans (Utility Department). (The Public Utilities
Board recommends approval.)
13. Consider authorizing the use of explosives for
blasting at the new landfill site.
14. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
15. New Business:
This item provid,s a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the _ day of _ 1985 at o'clock
(a.m.) (p.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
1b48C
Alf IM
-rv
DV C17Y OF DENroN, rE:{AS
OFFICE OF rNE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
Joe D. Maria, AmEtUrt City Attorney
Robert & Hunter, Aaaiatant City Attamey
DATE: February 12, 1985
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Joe D. Morris, Acting City Attorney
SUBJECT: Updating the 1982 ordinance establishing the four
Single Member Districts for the April 6, 1985
election to account for annexations.
In reviewing the procedures for the April 6, 1985 single member
district city elections of councilpersons, I found that the
present single member districts established by Ordinance No.
82-100, effective November 16, 1982 (copy attached), has not been
. updated to take into account some 20 annexations that have
occurred since the passage of Ordinance No. '82-100, Although
there have been no new Denton County election precincts added as a
result of the annexations, there are several new census tracts, or
parts thereof, that are now within the city limits that are not
indicated in Ordinance No. 82-100.
The Code of Federal Regulations (28 CFR 51) made pursuant to
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, requires that, prior to the
enforcement of any "change affecting voting," that the city obtain
npreclearancei, from the U. S. Department ac Justice. A "change
affecting voting" includes "any changes in the constituency of an
official or the boundaries of the voting unit" through annexations.
[28 CFR Sec. 51.12 (e)] A submission to the Justice Department for
preclearance of these annexations must be made and approved prior
to the April 6, 1985 election.
I have asked that this matter be put on the council agenda for
February 199 1985 for discussion and consideration. The
information concerning the location of the annexations and number
of persons within such annexation will be furnished by the
Department of Planning and Community Development. We do not
anticipate any significant change in the number of persons in each
district as a result of the annexations.
,...r
Mayor and Members of the City Council
February 12, 1985
Page Two
After the Council has considered this matter at the February 19th
meeting, a public hearing must be held and a new ordinance
approved to take into account the annexations. I would request
that the Council call a special meeting for the following week to
hold the public hearing and approve the updated ordinance
establishing the single member districts. This is necessary
because a submission to the Justice Department may not be made
until the ordinance is approved. After approval, of the
ordinance, the Justice Department normally has 60 days to approve
the submission of the "change of voting". This 60 day period
would put the approval date beyond the April 6, 1985 election
date. We will be asking the Justice Department to expedite the
approval of the submission and do not believe that there will be
any problem in gaining such approval.
JOV D. MORRIS
JDM: js
xc: Chris Hartung
a
N0. ¢a JQ~
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND DESCRIBING FOUR SINGLE MEMBER ELECTION
DISTRICTS IN THE CITY OF DENTO.N, rEXAS; DETERMINING THE POPULATION
OF THE CITY OF DENTON AND OF EACH SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT; AND
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE FROM AND AFTER
THE. DATE OF PASSAGE OF THIS ORDINANCE.
Whereas, Section 2.01(d) of Article II of the Charter of the
City of Denton, Texas as amended by the qualified voters of the city
on January 19, 1980, requires that the city council divide the city
into four single mcmber election districts for the election of
meslbers of the cite council; Now Therefore;
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS, HckE!~Y ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
The City of Denton. Texas is hereby divided into four single
member geographic election districts. Such single members geo-
graphic election districts are hereby created and described as
follows:
• District 1.
Single member geographic election district !umber 1 shall
include the following 1980 Denton County, Te%as census tracts,
established by the United States Census Bureau, to-wit:
Tract 205.02 2,044 Persons
Tract 207 762 Persons
Tract 208 47 Persons (Block 101)
Tract 209 493 Persons
Tract 210 3,689 Persons
Tract 211 1,835 Persons
Tract 212 2,578 Persons
Tract 213 427 Persons (Blocks 1010 1020
1030 106 5 109)
111871 Persons
or any part of any such tracts now or hereafter annexed as a part of
the co*porate limits of the City of Denton, Texas.
Single member geographic election District Number 10 as
hereinabove described, includes the following Denton County, Texts
election precincts as now established by the Commissioners Court. of
Denton County, Tex-is, to-wit:
1. That portion of Frecinct No. 1-K lying north of
McU nney street, East and Sout', of Mingo load, West of
Mockingbird tan. and North and Northwest of Anv#rs Lane,
k7 vy'
J r t :'n .
t
11.E b t' 2. All of Precinct 1-S
in the City of Denton.
3. All of Precinct I.V.
4. That portion of Precinct 1-D lying North of Inters. Highway I-35 East.
S. That portion of Precinct 1-J lying North of Interstate
Highway I-35 East.
6. All of Precinct 4-1, except that portion of Precinct
4-1. lying south of Eagle Drive and Nest of Bernard
Street.
7. That portion of Precinct 4-G lying East of Avenue E
and North of Eagle Drive.
I
District 2.
Single member geographic election district Number 2 shall
include the following 1980 Denton County, Texas census tracts,
established by the United States Census Bureau, to-wit:
Tract 205.01 4,308 Persons
Tract 205.02 4,994 Persons
Tract 206.01 865 Persons
Tract 206.02 1 947 Persons
ri,fft Persons
• or any part of any such tracts now or hereafter annexed as a part of
the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas.
Single member geographic election District Number 1, as herein-
above described, includes the following Denton County, Texas
election precincts as now established by the Commissioners Court of
Denton County, Texas, to-wit:
1. All of Precinct No. 4-14 in the City of Denton.
2. All of Precinct 1-E in the City of Denton,
3. All of Precinct 1-H in the City of Denton.
4. All of Precinct 1-1, in the City of Denton.
5. All of Precinct 1-G in the City of Denton.
6. That portion of Precinct 14 lying East Audra Lane and
South of Audra Lane.
District 3.
Single member geographic election district Number 3 shall
include the following 1980 Denton County, Texas census tracts,
established by the United States Census Bureau, to-wits
• Tract 204.01 773 Persons
Tract 204.02 20944 Persons
Tract 204.03 3,S79 Persons
Tract 206.01 20598 Persons
Tract 207 2 122 Persons
rz-,M Persons
PAGE
R r _r a ^r% «v
WYODEWON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
i
M E M O R A N D U M
TOt The Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMt G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
DATE: February 13, 1985
SUBJFCP: BIRD ROOST DELIBERATION
RECOMMENDATION:
In view of the numerous problems associated with urban bird roosts, we
initiated research to determine practical as well as feasible solutions
to eradicating bird roosts. Ut +n the conclusion of our research, which
consisted of communicating with the National Humane Society, United
States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service (i.e.,
regional, state, and local levels), Texas A&M Wildlife and Fishers
Division, otter municipalities, and Sally S. Erdman (formerly the City's
ornithological consultant) and her files, we feel the.t habitat modifica-
tion is the most appropriate solution.
SUMMARYt
The habitat modification approach to roost eradication is associated
sith certain exclusive benefits. First of all, the success rate of the
habitat modification program is unequalled by any other competing
method. Other bird control methods, such as erecting scare devices, the
use of loud noises, and high pressure water spraying, do not consistent-
ly producxe satisfactory success= and in incidents of success, the
effects ere normally temporary. Secondly, because habitat modification
is a roost preventive approach which requires action to be taken prior
to the birds' arrival at the location, it is accepted by the United
States Fish and Wildlife for use against migratory birds, such as the
Cattle Egrets which are known to inhabit the Kerley Street Roost. And
finally, habitat modification will curtail and, in some cases, prevent
the outcry of citicens complaining of the problems associated with bird
BIRD ROOST DELIBERATION
February 13, 1985
Page 2
roosts, and organizations and/or citizens commenting on the inhumane
treatments of animals. In attempting to establish a habitat modifica-
tion program, we will require property owners to make the appropriate
changes to their property to eliminate bird roosts. An ordinance is
presently being reviewed by the attorney's office which contains the
basic elements of a good habitat modification program.
As you are aware the need for a method of eliminating bird roosts arose
from the health and nuisance problems produced by it. The primary
problem is attributed to the rapid buildup of excrement. Apart from tbn
mosquitoes, house flies, blow flies (i.e., if dead birds are in the
area, which is very likely), fleas, ticks, and mites that are attracted
to bird roosts, a number of diseases are also likely to be present.
While Encephalitis is the most serious 9isease, Histoplasmosis is
considered to be the most prevalent. The basis of the nuisance problems
are pervading odors and persistent noises emanating from roosts which
greatly disturb neighborhoods. Unfortunately, once a roost has begun,
it is possible for the menace to continue for months.
BACKGROUND:
The City's bird control program can be traced as far back as 1975 which
involved attempts to reduce and/or contain the city's Blackbird roost
population. The species of birds within the Blackbird roost were Common
Crackles, Starlings, Brown-Headed Cowbirds, and Blackbirds] therefore,
various roost dispersal methods were allowable. A few of the dispersal
methods practiced over the years were automatic exploders, shot-like
noises, tapes of Blackbird distress calls, claw gun application, and
shoot-to-kill programs.
During the spring of 1981, the Cattle Egrets, Little Blue Herons, and
Snowy White Egrets joined the other bird species in utilizing the City
of Denton for nesting purposes. The addition of the Cattle Egrets to
our bird population brought with it certain limitations on our bird
control program. Because Cattle Egrets are migratory birds, they are a
protected specie under International Laws therefore, the United States
Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service did not and will
not allow the disturbance of the Cattle Egrets rookery. This protection
has permitted the Cattle Egrets to flourish within our City limits
(i.e., the Kerley Street Roost). In the spring of 1981, approximately
900 Cattle Egrets roosted in Denton, and the number increased to 7,500
for the 1984 spring inhabitants.
BIRD ROOST DELIBERATION
February 13, 1985
Page 3
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The primary divisions which shall be affected by the habitat modifica-
tion program are the Animal Control and Code Enforcement Divisions.
Animal Control will be required to locate and identify bird roosts. How
frequently a roost is used and the specie of birds inhabiting it will
affect the applicatic.i of the habitat modification program. After
Animal Control has recommended specific modifications to eradicate
established bird roosts, Code Enforcement will inform the appropriate
prcperty owners of the required charges. The above-mentioned divisions
will be totally responsible for the habitat modification program, and if
applied effectively, it will drastically reduce the burden and :om-
plaints focused at other segments of our organization due to bird
control programs,
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respectfully submitted,
G. Chris Hartung
City Manaqer
Prepared by:
y /
"Zz
Harlan p4Wrson
Administrative Assistant Trainee
Apprtved by:
Bill Angelo
Assistant to the Director of
Public Works
HJ/8c
PW
ne ' 4-0 r ,i v T r n n '9 a a
'r r i "ir t?k .
WrYof DEWON, rEXi1S MUNICIPAL BUILDING I DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (8117)566-M
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Betty McKean
Assistant City Manager
FROM: Kathryn Usrey, Director
Personnel/Employee Relations
DATE: February 14, 1985
SUJ9: Affirmative Action Program
The City of Denton's Affirmative Action Program was Initiated In 1981 with the
city Council's approval of the Affirmative Action Plan. This report will:
1. Provide analysis of current work force statistics
2. Identify our current and ongoing strategies for Affirmative Action.
ANALYSIS OF WORK FORCE STATISTICS
The current statistics on the City of Denton work force are presented in two
formats on Table I and Table 11 at the end of this report. Table I rresents
the 1984 data In comparison to 1981 by job family. The following excerpt
presents the City wide summarles of these two years.
GENDER MINORITY STATUS
YEAR NO. TOTAL EMPLOYEES M F N/M• 8' H' OTHER
1981 367 443 124 430 11 25 1
PERCENT 78.1 21.9 93.5 1.9 4.4 .2
1984 644 487 157 572 31 34 7
• ERCENT 75.6 24.4 88.8 4.8 9.11 1,1
*N/M Non-Mlnorlty 8 - Black M 0 Hispanic
r
ji t, gay, a ~ra r ( i,.',. rr ryA b4 ;i'~ f r R 1~.. •
,'.r r I "p>• L,Y ! a t*.. F^'ry it
Afflrmatlve Action Memo
Page 2
s
Increases have occurred in a I the targeted areas with the corresponding
decrease In the non-minorlty male category.
Table II brings these statistics into focus with the available Denton County
Labor Force. The comparlsoi of tine 2 (available labor force) and line 3
(City work force) reveals t at we still need Improvement in both the
non-minority and minority female categories. Over all in the other
categories, we either tracts or exceed the statistics provided us by the Texas
Employment Commission.
STR JEO(ES FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
The following are our curt' ent strategies for recruiting minority applicants.
o Meekly Affirmative Action job opportunity listings are sent to
targeted mIncrlty community leaders, minority churches, and
minority organizations.
o Orientation passions are conducted prior to all Civil Service
• Exams. The ;purpose of the orientation is to ease the anxiety
minority applicants might have over the examination.
o Availablllt+ of bi-lingual personnel for the facilitation cf
communication In the Interviewing process or other areas 1. needed.
o Through ou annual salary survey process, we stlve to maintain
competitive salaries to Improve our ability to recruit.
o Oevelopmertal Tracking is a process that trains and develops City
employees in an effort to prepare then for more advanced positions,
o A cross-tactlon of racial/erhnle personnel in the
Personne /Employee Relations office. This contributes to
promotlnl a receptive and accomodat(ng environment for all
applicants,
o Public 'ervice announcements of upcoming Fire and Police Civil
Service examinations are placed on radio stations targeted to
specific minority audlencet.
o New Employee Orientation It conducted every six woeks.
Orienfatlon Is meant to inform all new employees of the City's
EEO, pnd Affirmative Action policies.
o Staneardlzed fob descriptions establishing minimum qualifications
that apply to all applicants.
I 4 FK~'~ " ~ ♦ J' I9 r 'C'~'1, m' u ~ a"~i'~`tFTS"' 0. ~ s y , n ;r ~ : s;
AtflOm atlve Action Memo
PO9e 3
I
s
STATEGIES FOR INSURING THAT OUR EEO STATUS IS WELL KNOWN
o A letter expressing the City's position as an equal opportunity
employer Is malled out annually to all entities on our Affirmat''ve
Action mailing list.
o All advertlsing is accompanied by the "equal
opportunity/affirmative action employer" clause. I.e.
newspapers, radio, cable T.Y.
o Daily classlfled ads In the local paper identifying the City as an
equal opportunity/afflrmative action employer,
o Weekly Affirmative Action mailing announcing job opportunities
available with the City. (See attachment 111)
o EEO posters In strategic places thrcughoit the City. I.e.
Personnel/Employee Relations office, Clty Hell, and the Service
Cantor.
o EEO brochures available at the application desk for all interested
parties.
•
STRATEGIES ''OR INCREASING SUPERVISORY KNOWLEDGE AND AWARENESS OF EEO
i
o Supervisory training on Affirmative Action and Equal Employment
Opportunity policies.
o Supervisor training on approprlute Interviewing techniques.
o Role of the Supervisor training for supervisors.
o Coaching aimed at apprising supervisors of the special employment
Issues allicable to minority and female employees.
o Individual counseling Then there are specific relations! problems
Involving minorities.
o EEO advisors are utlIlzed to provide valuable input In the
updating of the Affirmative Action Program.
d, ~rt~ J 1 y 44P H .k~ 'e~ l )rhe k~1,
N '7
Affirmative Action Memo
Pays
STRATEGIES FOR INSURING CONPIIANCE WITH EEO POLCIES
o Job openings are posted In a standardized and timely manner.
o Applicants are screened by the Personnel/Employee Relations
Oepartment.
o New employees are Issued a brochure of the Ctty's equal amp] oyment
opportunity policy at New Employee Orientation.
o New City employees are advised of the City's "Open Loor Policy" at
Now Employee Orientation.
o Career counseling Is avallabie Io all City employees upon request.
o The In-Douse advancement policy is aimed at promoting the
professional development of all Clty employees.
• SUMMARY
In the future we pi an to be working with several departments to Identlfy
strategies to assist In increasing minority applicants and hiring In their
specific areas of rasponslblllty.
The statistics presented herein do Identify areas where we need more work, but
also Indicate progress. We have every Intention of continuing our efforts In
every area.
If further Information Is needed, please feel free to call me,
/ r
K i ryn Way, Director y
Personnel/Employee RelsOons
KU/bd
2397P/0063P
'I
CITE DENTON o
COMPARISON BY JOB FAMILY
1981/1984
FEBRUARY 15, 1985
TABLE 1
1 9 8 1 1 9 8 4
(TOTAL CITY1 GENDER i MIMQgITY STATUS ((TOTAL CITY1 GENDER I MINORITT STATUS •
JOB GROUP IEMPLOYEES 1 M I F I N/M 1 B 1 H 10THERI IEMPLOYEES I M I F I N/M 1 9 1 N IMil
! 1 i t 1 I 1 II ! ! I 1 I
OFFICIALS/ I ! 1 I ! I I II ! t I 1 I I
ADMINISTRATORS/ I { I ! I I I II 1 ! I 1 I I
MANAGEMENT/ ! ! I I I I I II 1 I I I I I
SUPERVISION ! 90 ! 82 I 8{ 85 1 0 1 5 1 0 11 67 1 S'j 1 9 1 64 1 1 1 7( 0
I I I I i I l II ~ I ,J I I I
{ I I I I 1 I II I { I 1 I I
PROFESSIONAL 1 20 { 14 { 6 { 17 { 2 1 1 1 0 45 I 27 { 18 { 37 I 3 1 1 { 4
1 l I I I I I II I I l I I
TECHNICAL/ i I { I I 1 { II I I i ! I {
PARR { I I I I I 1 II I I ! f I i
PROFESSIONAL { 101 { 83 1 18 { 96 { 2 1 3 1 0 11 141 1125 { 16 130 1 5 i 5 1 1
OFFICE/ I { I { I I I I I I I I
SUPPORT 1 83 { 7 { 76 { 77 1 1 1 S { 0 11 104 11 { 93 I 94 { 4 1 S 1 1
1_ I I L.._, I l I 11 _ J I l I I 1
SERVICE I I I I I ! I II { 1 ! I 1 f
MAINTENANCE ( 127 { 116 1 11 { 111 { S { 11 { 0 II 133 1 118 1 15 { 97 ! 16 1 20 1 0
_ I j I I~1 i I Il I I I ~ I I_
POLICE/ I 1 I 1 I I I II I 1 I ! { I
FIRE { 145 1140 { 5 1 144 1 0 1 0{ 1 154 { 148 1 6 1 150 { 2 1 1 E 1
I 1 I l I ! I l~ I I l I I 1
! i I 1 I I 1 II ! ! I ! I 1
TOTALS 1 $67 1 443 ( 124 1530 1 11 { 25 I 1 11 644 { 487 { 157 1 572 1 31 1 34 1 7
I _j,_ I I I 11 I i I t_ I 1
PERCENT OF l { I I ! ! ! 11 i I I ( I
TOTALS ! 178.1 121.9 193.5 1 1.9 1 4.4 1 0.2 11 175.6 124.4 188.8 1 4.8 1 5,3 1 1.1
i L I I l I 1 ll I I I I I 1
2/15/85
038Sr
i
I
DEN COUNTY
• ANALYSIS OF RIART LABOR FORCES •
TABLE 2
Male I Female I Totals
I I I I I 1 I I I ! I
I Non- I I His-[ other ITotal I Ron- I I His-1 other ITOta1 I Male a
iNinoritylelacklpaniclMinocittesl Male 1Mlnorityl6lack1panteiNinoritteslFemelel reside
I I I I I I I 1 I I
I 1 I I I I i 1 { f
1. Percent of Population I I I I I I I 1 1 f I
in Denton County. 1 44.3 1 1.9 12.2 1 0.7 1 49.1 I 45.4 1 2.4 12.3 I 0.8 1 $0.9 1 100%
! 1 { 1 I I I { 1 { I
I I I { I I I I I i I
2. Percent of Present I I I I ! I I ! 1 { I
Labor Forces in Denton I I I { I I I I 1 I f
County. 1 51.7 12.0 12.3 I 0.8 I $6.8 I 38.7 1 2.1 11.6 I 0.8 ( 43.2 I 100%
! I 1 I I I I I I 1 I
3. City of Denton Work { I 1 I I I I I 1 { I
Forcexe Analysis. I 66.6 14.2 1 3.4 I 1.1 175.6 ( 22.2 ( 0.6 11.5 I 0.0 124.4 { 100%
I I I I I I I I I i I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I 1 f I I I I I I I I
4. Unemployment of Labor I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I
Force In Denton county. I 2.9 15.6 14.1 1.3 I 3.0 I 4.3 110.7 1 7.8 1 6.1 1 4.8 1 3.8
SOURCE/DATE
1. Denton County population data front Texas Employment Commission, July 1984.
2. Denton County Labor force data from Texas Employment Commission, July, 1984.
3. City of Denton facility work force data front January, 31, 1985, payroll.
4. Unemployment rate of labov force in Denton County.
a Labor forc6--identifies the number of individuals avtllsbte for eaployvoat.
as Bork force--identifies the number of indkviduate employed.
neloartaliftPloyse Relations
03~Ss
a2ils/as
ppN War ii0 S I+t r N~ v K +t K.v r 9'h" A "fit rt l 11 s. r a
y ~'r t ■ f "{~1.. '3i
i~
J
III
I
it
CITY OF DENTON
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
MAILING LIST
- tI . f ^ t$ " Y MK.%{
4 r ._i ; ~k 'Q,
IT 'I
,
Employment 8 Training
209 East Jefferson
Dellas, TX 75203 Recruitment Officer_
Career Planning 6 Placement Center
University of Houston-University Park
4800 Calhoun
Houston, TX 77004 Placement Director
University of Texas at El Paso
Placement Director
El Peso, TX 79968 Placement Director-
Wm 1. Williamson
Employment Counselor
P.O. Box 249
Denton, lX 76201 Mr, Williamson-
Charles Goodall
Director, Intercultural Services
East Texas Station
Commerce, TX 75428 Mr. Goodall_
Chip Ates
North Lake College, Planning d Placement
5001 N. McArthur
Irvii.g, TX 75038 Mr, Ates_
Radio KESS
"Busca TrabaJo"
P.Q. B.x 6195
Ft, Worth, TX 76115 Recruitment Officer
Nancy Kamman
Counselor
1007 Fulton
Denton, TX 76201 Nancy_
Services to the Handicapped
Dean of Students
NTSU, Suite 319
Oentnn, TX 76201 Recruitment Officer-
Lloyd A. Webb, Executive Director
North Texas Education and Training Co-op
P.O. Box 1604
Denton, TX 16202 Mr. Webb
Or. Einelta Dever,
1914 Emerson
Denton, TX 76201 Dr, Dever_
Cooke County Adult Ed. Coop.
• Box 125
Valley View, TX 76272 Recruitment Ofllser.
t
y t 1 IrxPr. f ! ..vv 4a;t q
v [ Y t4 3 r rc Ir i r~.^ w` `70 w, a tr
Progra+s Coordinator
VOC Rehab Center
Box 13438, NTSU Station
. Denton, TX 76203 Recruitmen+ Officer-
Mr. Emillo Oonzeles
LULAC
216 W. Collins
Denton, TX 76201 Mr. Gonzales
Tarrant County Junior College
Placement Office
828 Harwood Rd.
Hurst, TX 76053 Placement Officer
Bishop College
Bobby Plpplns, Counseling
3837 Slmpson-Stuart Rd.
Dallas, TX 75241 Mr. Plpplns_
Donna Mainzer Ingram
Brookhaven College, Placement Office
3939 Valley View Ln.
Farmers Branch, TX 75234 Ms. ingram_
Mrs. Mary Jo Leach, Pres. Offico
Cooks County College
P.O. Box 815
• Gainesville, Tx 76240 Mrs. Leach`
Cooks County College
Flnenclal Aid Office
P.O. 8oK 615
Gainesville, TX 16240 P*cruitment Officer
0. Arlington Talbot
Special Assistant to the Preslden+
East Texas State University
Commerce, TX 15428 Mr. Talbot
Martha Whelan
Placement Office
McClennan Community College
Waco, TX 76708 Ms. Whelan
NTSU
Personnel Department
NTSU Station, Box 13497
Denton, TX 76203 Recruitment Officer
NTSU Student Employment
Christine Baker
NTSU Station, Box 5356
Oen+on, TX 76203 Christine
~ ~t +yP f _Jq ~"n' 3 T' T
T0Xes Women's UnivaraIty
Placement Office
. TWU Station, Box 22939
Oenton, TX 76204 Placement Officer
Jerry C, Moore, Director, Placement Services
The University of texas at Dallas
P.O. Box 830688 MCI6
Richardson, TX 75083 Mr. Moors
Alumni Placement Specialist
UTA - Placement Office
P.O. Box 19156
Arllnft-)n, TX 76019 Ple:ement Officer
Corpus C h r 1 9 t t Unlverslty
Placement Office
Corpus Christ., TX 76411 Placement Officer
Dallas County Community College
District OEECD
701 Elm Street
Dallas, TX 75202 Recruitment officer-
Huston-Tillotson College
Placement Director
1820 East 8th St.
Austin, TX 78702 Placement Officer
• Jarvis Christlah College
Dr. D.O. Henry
a o x "0"
Hawkins, TX 75765 Dr. Henry
Mrs. Mildred U. Pratt
Prairie View A&M University
P.O. Box 2146
Pr a I r I a ylew, TX 17445 Mrs. Pratt
Paul Quinn College
Student Development Center
1020 Elm Street
Waco, TX 76104 Recruitment Officer
David Fridle
Texas Southern University
3201 Wheeler St.
Houston, TX 77004 Mr. Frldlo
St. Phllllp'I College
Placement Director
San Antonio, TX 78203 Pla:ement Director
. Lauri Alvarez
1002 W. Oltorf
Austin, TX 78704 Ms. Alvarez
,d , k r
~ z ,~}~r 1 ~ t K~. ~7 dF rv' ~ Sir K 1~ + ~r ~ P v rv;~,~ ~ ~r i~:i ~C.~i ,i"' ~,in w t ~"pY ]'Wt~~S x I ~r. 6 ~'r
y.
r
P", ~ w ~,pi r , ~ ¢ n r y t ac; er, S AF ~.;a r
Mr, Joe M I t c h a I I
NTSU Station
Box 13497
• Denton, TX 76203 Mr, Mitchell_
Snelling 8 Snelling
1204 West Unlverslty Dr.
Suits 317
Denton, TX 76201 Recruitment Officer
Sylvia Reavis-COMPA
City of Ft. Worth
1000 Throckmorton
Ft. North, TX 76102 Sylvia_
Rosemary Droke, Placement Director
St. Me%ryls University
San Antonio, TX 78284 Ms. Droks
Adult Learning Center
c/o Tamara Garcla
201 South Locust
Denton, TX 76201 Tama:e
St. Edward's University
Placement Director
3001 South Congress
Austin, TX 78704 Placement Director. • Mr, Deriy GuaJardo
Pan American Unlverslty
Student Services Bldg„ Rm. 147
Edinburg, TX 78539 Mr. GuaJardo
Southern Methodist University
Career Center
P.O. Box 256
Dallas, TX 75275 Recruitment Officer
Gary Baird
District Parole Oiflcer
210 South Elm, Suite 200
Denton, TX 76201 Gary_
Texas College
L.4, Nouls, Director of Placement
2404 North Grand Avenue
Tyler, TX 75701 Mr, N a u I s
Texas State Technical Institute
Nancy Neill
Placement Office
Waco, TX 76105 Ms. Nelll
Texas Ashabilltatlon Commlcslon
Clear Creek Office Perk
1213N. Locust
Denton, TX 16201 Recrultment officer
s a tr . h 4 +t T S
1. xOM d~4` .yi ~I~ n`, ~x~ i+v^:y N l'i t x •~i~1 ~M t'rt ~~74 v," ~V."}
Wide "81'11Ints,IaY
"V FM SerV100 0fftce
909 Sunset
Oenton, TX 76201 Mr, Billingsley,
. Veterans Service Office
Denton County Courthouse Annex
301 E. McKinney St.
Denton, TX 76201 Recruitment Officer_
Texas Women's University
Financial A I d Office
TWO Station, Box 22628
Denton, TX 76204 Recruitment Officer_
Mr. Noble Hollane
816 lakey St.
Oenton, TX 76201 Mr. Holland-
St. Andrew's Pro sbyter Ian Church
300 Mast Oak
Denton, TX 76201 Recruitment 0ffIcer_
Miley College
Director of Personnel
P.O. Box 19176
Ariington, TX 76019 Director-
Mr. Paul Miller
Donton Co, Adult Probation
Courthouse on the Square
3rd Fio)r
Denton, TX 76201 Mr, Miller
J.J. Maida
Denton County Housing Authority
410-C Coronado
Denton, TX 76201 Ms. Waldo
Gladys Astan
Info & Reference for Denton Co,
301 East Oak
Denton, TX 76201 Ms. Aston
Acme Express Personnel
IOOS M. University Dr.
Denton, TX 76201 Recruitment Offlcer
Dr. H.P. Buckley
Golden Triangle Employment
P.O. Box 669
Denton, tX 76201 Dr. Buckley`
Ms. Priclila Smith
. Texas Employment Commission
P,O. BOX 1973
Denton, TX 16201 Ms. Smith
\ 7
Malgs#ream+s Project LINK
Diamond Shamrock Bulldin9
Suite 1070
717 North Harwood
Dallas, TX 75201 Recrultment Officer-
•
dr rta., ']4 4 ' f` ,f^dl" z ' ~r i z` a ' w ° , l u: + . A' :A aq 1 Y, h r, z w z, r r a . '_^r'
i f r.d tr`, i z ~d- 1"~ A IT Ilz .icy
f ^
P
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TEI.EPNONE (817) 566.8200
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
DATE: February 12, 198S
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE
A discussion of tie City of Denton Strategic Plan is scheduled
for the February 19, 1985, work session. Enclosed for your
convenience prior to the discussion are both the February 1,
1985, draft of the Strategic Plan and the City of Denton 1984
Staff Retreat Goals (green insert). The following is a
proposed agenda for discussion during the scheduled work
session:
1. To determine if the Mission Statement of the Strategic
Plan needs to 1;e further expanded or refined so that it
uniquely reflects Denton's direction.
2. To solicit direction from the City Council in addressing
the thoroughidss of the Data Base (second section) for
making future planning decisions.
3. To as.,ess the extent to which the Strategic Plan 1984
Goals (last section in the document) are realistic and
continue to be considered priorities in light of the new
information supplied in the Data Base and long range
financial forecasts.
4. To establish target dates for the 1984 Strategic Plan
Goals.
51 To consider the possibility of incorporatin the enclosed
City of Denton 1984 Staff Retreat Goals green insert)
~'~olz,~lir h" w t fl~i Yn.fS v rf to.• -'a "~3"' + ~ ~.i' n FY;to rn7` A S 'C, ~„1 Ns
Mayor and Members of the City Council
February 12, 1985
Page Two
into the Strategic Plan in order to ,)roiide intermediate goals
between the Mission Statement and more specific objectives avid
action steps.
Discussion at this work session will primarily attempt to
consider the above. We would like to focus on the sec'ions of
the Strategic Plan regarding streeigths, weaknesses, and
assumptions at a follow-up meeting, r:e will be discussing the
format of that follow-up meeting (i.e., study sessions,
workshop, retreat, etc.).
If you have any questions regarding this material, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
ett c e
Assistant City Manager
lj
2123M
Enclosure
CITY OF DEMN
1984 STAFF RETREAT GO.ALS
I. Goal: Develop a problem solving, results oriented, and
responsive City work force.
H. Goal: Provide and promote leisure and educational
opportunities.
111. Goal: Ensure high standards in the provision of municipal
facilities and services.
M Goal: Protect life and property.
• V. Goal: Plan and encourage balanced development of the
community.
VI. Goal: Ensure a financially sound and stable City gow.-rn-
ment.
VII. Goal: Operate City government openly, fairly, and equitably.
VIII. Goal: Prcmote and encourage community pride and involvement.
F 'Y L~ h S r ~t X1.]b j ~ ~a~- ° w<.~ -ra< 1 r'r
Ntr~ j '
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
STRATEGIC PLAN
FEBRUARY 1, 1985
(Preliminary Draft)
r .
777 ;77T
.},V ::5o `c M '4t t,d , 1. i •y TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
STRATEGIC PLAN
t. MISSION STATEMENT
It. DATA BASE FOR STRATEGIC PLAN
Section One: population, Demographics and Land Area
Section Two: Housing
Section Three: Economic Climate
Section Four: Quality of Life Services
Section Five: Public Safety Services
Section Six: Transportation
Section Seven: Infrastructure
Section Eight: City Finances
Section Nine: Citizen Perspective
III. STRENGTHS ANO WEAKuESSES OF DENTON'S ENVIRONMENT
Iv. KEY ASSWIPTIONS OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN
V. 1934 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
o Quality of Life Goals
o Public Safety Goals
o Transportation Goals
o Infrastructure Goals
0519s
01/15/85
77
777'7~Ti T,
rr ~bj t"¢~f v N ^ ''fJr n' v3j 9 r 5 t y
• I, MISSION STATEMENT
s
% y.,,`;F
•
1. MISSION STATEMENT FOR THE CITY OF DENTON
It is the purpose of the City of Denton to provide and encourage an
economic and social environment which is conducive to a model
quality of life. It is our intent to provide services in a
fiscally responsible manner. We will provide an opportunity for
our citizens to express their ideas and values to determine a
course of action for our region and beyond. Through cooperative
action in our region, it is our desire to be a visionary leader of
the future.
01/15/85
• II. DATA BASE FOR STRATEGIC PLAN
•
C 4. 'a1 K>;ti F 1; i w.Y aJ~ h n'f ° ' b l l r
Y f' j 4 A
• SECTION ONE: POPULATIONS DEMOGRAPHICSo AND LAND AREA
•
t; N 1 t ?1 e-~ r' ^ ~ e r i. T n ..4 fo - t ~
•
SECTION TWO- HOUSING
i
I
i
l lti ~y r ~ `~f~1 i 5 rJ[~ ~ t ~v~~~~ r W"~a~Y ~t+n„ y ! ~~a .T f w 'aN X r 9' ~'y 9I '
SECTION THREE; ECONOMIC CLIMATE
F t f 1 x N m`f ~J. d - x,f[..., c :'i ^,.ri c. ~ ~ c Y J
rvi
+}.l dll 1, +1 1 J 1 ~
• SECTION FOUR: QUALITY OF LIFE SERVICES
y ~'g i ; ~ ea n? ~ ~r fir, i ti~a 1~• SECTION FIVE; PUBLIC ;1FETY SERVICES
V Y k s 'q .s w. a t .fir( 1. A a i s a, ~ ( p x r
q
x ti '9 i,,r ~11 ;~i :;i~ r ~ 'xE `A'; r1. :~.A i n ~ x}•'•.. t~e~ ~+UY s/.
r r h .f a t, xM:
I
i
SECTION SIX: TRANSPORTATION
3 1 f ! l,e d
y e S*a>r 1 1 a t K v~r,4
4~ t J T S i 0, a 0° { 1 r ",'r 5 }z i'+ ) •
• SECTION SEVEN: INFRASTRUCTURE
m
17 Ali >s' _ ~ i t v xa° x ;`1E Z y s.r a-, .e t ,s
f
•
• SECTION EIGHT: CITY FINANCES
•
Caw *~'r'~.<- a 'r° F ~°l`~ i i ,r.l . ! °
N i r
SECTION NINE: CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE
I
•
• 111, STRENGTHS AND NEAXNESSES OF DENTON' S ENVIRONMENT
t .
STRENGTHS
1. Two major universities
2. Highly educated work force and community
3. Sunbelt climate
4. Located near major transportation centers
5. Diverse and balanced economrv
6. Financially strong community and city government
7. Low tax rates
8. Low level of debt
9. Plentiful capital
10. Strong utilities
• 11. Relatively new and well -constructed public facilities and equipment
12. Regional retail shopping center
13, Strong sales tax base
14. Adequate control of utilities
15. Plenty of room for expansion
16. Ethnic, racial, and social harmony
17. Good water recreation facilities
18. Fine cultural opportunities
19. Growing economic base
20. Good public health facilities (a regional public health center)
01/15/85
.7777
•
WEAKNESSES
1. No public transportation
2. Young and mobile work force (largely blue collar or service
oriented)
3. Deteriorating street and drainage systems
4. Poor City-County relationship
5. Non-taxable property
6. Accumulative zoning
7. Public facilities operating at capacity
8. Beautification programs are underdeveloped
9. Traffic control
• 10. Lack of industrial growth
11. Slow-growing tax base
12. Inadequate park land
13. Lack of effective communicatii,n with populace
14. Lack of progressive thinking
15. Inability to control extraterritor.al jurisdiction
16. Dangerous air quality
17. Inadequate public employee salaries
01/15/35
1 '
•
I
I
• IV. KEY ASSUMPTION OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN
•
IV. KEY ASSUMPTION.; OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN
In any growth-related strategic planning process, environmental factors
must be considered, including the economy, population growth, current
financial climate, the make-up of the work force, and other, intangible,
factors. Although more research is needed before a final plan c•,n be
established, the following assumptions and recommendations regarding
growth and development have already been made:
• 1. The Prime Rate will go up one-fourth to one-half percent before
the election, and then rise dramatically.
2. Seventy-six thousand people will live in Denton by 1990.
3. Twenty thousand new gobs will be created in Denton by 1990.
4. The County and the City will work together in an economic
development effort.
5, There is plenty of roon for City growth.
01/15/85
•
it
Y. 1984 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
L~
QUALITY OF LIFE GOALS
1. Investigate the air quality situation in Denton and develop a plan
to reduce violations to five days or less by (insert date) .
Develop and implement a library funding plan that provides the
public with a variety of quality materials and services, and allows
for a 100 percent increase in patronage. The funding plan should
be developed by (insert date) .
3. Purchaae park land as needed to meet national park standards as
described in Section Four of the Strategic Plaa. (Note: More
specific goals are needed),
4. Provide park olacilities for each new schocl and require developers
to provide park land at a given ratio to the land they develop.
• This policy should be implemented by (insert date) .
5, Retain and Increase the Denton City/County Health Unit at a level
sufficient to serve a population of 100,000. (Note: More specific
goals are needed),
b. Investigate the possibility of the City having its own health
service. (Note: This goal was completed in September, 1984.1
7, Commission a study to ensure the availability of day care services
in Denton by (insert date) .
8. Continue recreation and support services for senior citizens at
present per capita levels.
9, Support completion of the Fine Arts complex. (Note: More specific
goals are needed),
01/15/85
4w ~3 ii _l MJt. .f ,A e 1 Q M 1' S.4niI DIY f41 F 1
777777r 777777, 1
PUBLIC SAFETY GOALS
1. Develop a plan for police services with staffing projections for
the future by (insert date) .
2. Decrease the 1985 crime rate to at least 10 percent below that of
1984.
3. Purc'A se land for the new fire station by _(insert date) .
i
4. Provide sufficient equipment, personnel, and facilities to
I
establish a three and one-half minute fire response time by
(insert date) .
01/15/85
v
TRANSPORTATION GOALS
1. Establish a bus route to connect TWU, NTSU, the square, and major
shopping centers by. (insert date) .
2. Develop a bus system to connect major residential and commercial
areas by (insert date) .
3. Develop connections with Dallas/Fort Worth (DART - CITRAN) systems
and to the Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport by (insert date) .
4. Continue to develop and support the SPAN and Nandi Hop Systems.
(Note: 14ore specific goals are needed).
5. Expand the taxi system by (insert date) (Note: Requires more
detail).
b. Develop a master transportation plan by (insert date) .
Establish a Park and Ride service to Dallas and the DFW Airport by
(insert date) .
8. Contract with SPAN for transportation services for the disabl%d
without regard to age by (insert date) .
01/15/85
x,•
INFRASTRUCTURE GOALS
1. Establish a plan to provide water and sewer service for a
population of 100,000 that maintains competitive rates. This plan
should be developed by (insert date) .
2. Streets:
Present 1984-85 By 1989-90
Total: 75 miles 80 miles 100 miles
Rebuilt: N/A 7 miles 35 miles
(of original 75) (of original 75)
3, hater 7istribution:
Present 1984-85 1989-90
340 miles 360 miles 440 miles
4. Sewer Distribution:
Present 1984-8S 1989-90
340 miles 355 miles 415 miles
5, Electricity Distribution: Index to population growth
6. Drainage: 1983-84 1989
Houses Flooded:
20 0
7. Bridges Rebuilt: 1984-85 1989-90
0 0
01/16/85
r' P °n ~ N J ~K ` s r i n ~ 'i7u ,r rt `y'1` r 1 a Sr y r c! xs o..
vY 8 , :r
%
A. City Population Projections: 1983-84 to 1988-89
City Population Projections: 1983-84 To 1988-89
66,000 Dopartment of Finance Projections
67,000
6dxw
65.000
64 /)00
63.M
C 62'000
67A00
60.000
$ ~,ooo
5!,000
57,mo
56,000
55x000
54400
53400
5.7000
563-84 739495 14994)6 ?Nd-e7 VV-M INS-e9
8. Long-Range City Population Projections:
Year 2000 Population Esttwates
State Estimate: 1 115900 I
NTCOG Estimate: I- /be/96
I
Average Estimate: I njju 1
01/15/85
i
! v^ r{ ! v s ev ^f',<,,. t yw c ! d ' e , ~...P }f cz v ! ,.p , ka zf". w:.
z
• C. City Population Growth Historical Comparison With Other
Governmental Units:
1970 1980 ercen Change
U.S. 203 i i
Texas 11 v1981655 14,228 9383 27.1%
Denton County 75,633 1431126 89.2%
Denton 39,874 48,063 20,5%
D. Denton County Population Growth: 1970 to 2000
Denton County Population Growth; 1970 to 2000
Kaooo
3xaac»
xo,ooo
no=
aea~roo
244OD0
22=
woAOa
,Wj=
,doxw
140A X
12uw
CJD=
840M
agaoo
WS 20oo
° Y' rs h i l y t Mt n. r:
;Z~ 7731 ell,
E. Denton County Population Breakdown: The following chart
shows
population figures for Denton for 1980-1934, broken down by city:
ompou n
Percent Change Annual
Denton Final Estimated ~T/IU 4/178 Growth
County 1980 l/i/84 to to Rate
Census Population 4/1/80 1/1/84 1980-84
DENTON COUNTY 143,126 192,200 89.2 34,3 7,65
Argyle 1 ,111 1 1400 150.8 26.0 5.95
Aubrey 948 1,200 29.7 26,6 6.07
Corinth 1,264 26050 174.2 62.2 12.85
JUMON 48j063 52,20U ZU.5 ,
Double Oak 836 1,350 N/A 61.5 12.73
Flower Mound 41402 81450 161.2 92.0 17.71
Hio.kory Creek 1,422 1,850 552.3 30.1 6.80
Highland Village 31246 3,900 529.1 20.1 4,70
• Krum 917 1,200 102,0 30.9 6.96
Lake Dallas 31177 31700 122.0 16.5 3.88
Lewisville 24,273 33,300 162.0 37,2 8.23
Little Elm 926 1,050 155.1 13.4 3.19
Pilot Point 2,211 2,400 33.0 8.5 2.07
Roanoke 910 1 ,050 11.4 15.4 3.64
Sanger 21574 2 ,950 60.6 14.6 3.47
Shady Stares 813 1,100 NIA 35.3 7.85
The Colony 12,400 160600 7.0 33,9 7.57
Remainder o Denton County -
(100 from Frisco, 2 from Plano,
16 from Southlake, 65 from Westlake,
920 fro m Dallas 27,899 from Carrollton)
F. Denton Population by Ethnic Identity:
PERCENTAGE OF
ETHNIC GROUP NUMBER TOTAL POPULATION '
White 389048 79.20%
Black 41742 9.90%
Spanish 26764 5,70%
Asian 465 .97%
Indian 162 .33%
Other 1 882 3.90%
TOTAL 4$;663 lam; 0II1~
Source: 1980 Census
G. Age Characteristics for the City of Denton:
PERCENT OF TOTAL
AGE NUMBER POPULATION
0 - 4 years 2653 5,5%
. 5 - 9 years 2601 5.4%
10 - 14 years 2874 6.0%
15 - 17 years 1972 4,1%
18 - 19 years 4036 8.4%
20 - 24 years 9991 20.8;
25 - 29 years 5298 11.0%
30 - 34 years 3500 7.3%
35 - 44 years 4620 9.6%
45 - 54 years 3431 7.1%
55 - 59 years 1586 3.3%
60 - 64 years 1383 2,9%
65 - 74 years 2329 4.8%
75 - 84 years 1391 2.9%
85 + years 398 .8%
TOTAL POPULATION 48;363 99.9%
MEDIAN AGE = 24,9
Source: 1980 Census
X, 1~
• H. Average Annual Unemployment Rates:
1978 1979 1980 1931 1982 1983
U. S. 5% 5.8'~ 7.1% 8.3% 10.1% 8.8%
Texas 4.0% 4.21 5.3% 4.5% 8.4% 8.6%
Denton County 3,3% 2.9% 2.9% 3,7% 5.4% 5.0%
Denton 3,8% 3.4% 3.4% 4.3% 7.3% 6.8%
Source: Texas Employment Commission
1. Other Demographic Information From the 1984 Denton Citizen Survey:
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980
Length of Residence
3-12 months 8.9 7.8 7,3 5.5 9.5
1-5 years 35.2 34,7 33.9 35.0 33.7
6-10 years 17.5 15.0 17.7 15.5 18.9
More than 10 years 38.4 42.5 41.4 43.8 37.9
Household Member Handicapped
Yes 6.5 5.1 7.6
No 93.5 94,9 92,4
Place of Work
Denton 76.3 78.8 84.4
Dallas 14,3 7.3 6.3
Fort North 0.8 2.9 1.6
Lewisville 0.8 4,4 1.6
Other 7.9 6.2 6.1
J. Years of School Completed by Persons 18 Years and Over:
CITY OF DENTON OENTON COUNTY
YEARS OF PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF
SCHOOL TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION
Elementary throu-h 3 years 17.2% 21.5%
of high school
4 years of high school 23.5 30.1%
1 to 3 years of college 33.0 26.2%
4 or more years of college 26.3 22.2%
TOTAL 100.0% 100,0%
Source: 1980 Census
i
y
K. Class of Worker (Em;loyed Persons 16 yrs. and Over):
TYPE OF TOTAL PERCENTAGE
EMPLOYEE EMPLOYMENT OF TOTAL
Private wage and salary worker 14 912 62%
Self-employed worker 1 467 6%
Unpaid family worker 85
Federal government worker 322 1%
State government worker 5,497 23%
Local govermw+nt worker I s866
T~
TOTAL R;M Source: 1980 Census
L. City of Denton: Geographical Area 2000:
The boundaries of the City of Denton encompass approximately 40
square miles. Assuming that Denton continues the policy of
annexing newly-developed areas, or areas of proposed
development, and assuming that the utility policies of the City
of Denton are not changed, it is anticipated that Denton's size
• will increase to approximately 60 square miles by the year 2000.
The expansion of boundaries will be primarily caused by growth
east and southeast of the City. Additional growth is also
likely in the Ryan Road and Brush Creek areas of the city.
After the construction of North Loop 288, annexations will be
needed as development occurs north of the loop.
1~.r 4rihf rr~. } v,+ "s ° ` c.~,.Yi'al t i,:%n ae ys@ r' ; :•r y,x.+ y. 4
• M. Annexation/Disannexation:
CITY OF DENTON
ANNEXATION/OISANNEXATION
1977 - 1984
INCREASE/
SQUARE % DATE ACRES MILES DECREASE
January 1, 1977 21,599.81 33.75
January 1, 1978 21,985.35 34.35 +1.755
January is 1979 21,316.91 33.31 -3.045
January 1, 1980 219296.97 33.28 -0.095
lijanuary anuary 1, 1981 21,639.67 33.80 +1.61%
anuary 11 1982 22,116.67 34.56 +2.205
anuary is 1983 23,943,75 37.41 +8.265
l 1984* 25,256.33 39.46 +5.485
*The City's total area has increased 17 percent since
January, 1977.
• The steady increase over the past four years shows that Denton
is growing not only in population, but also in area, which will
aliow the City to manage and control the quality of development
that will occur in the "urban fringe."
N. University Land Area:
NTSU 393 acres, TNU 270 acres = 663 acres 04 square
miles). These figures are included in the above figures.
-
"'^W ! n P tv p n 77~ 117'
v
• HOUSING
A. Denton County Housing Overview:
Between 1970 and 1980, the population of Denton County grew from
75,633 to 143,126. By 1990, the area is projected to contain count around t227 he,citiesrofnCarrolltonuandaLewisville,oisogrowing most
rapidly.
Household growth (the increase in occupied housing units) has
been much faster than population growth due to a decline in
average household size. Between 1970 and 1980, the county
t,ined more than 26,300 households, or an average of more than
2600 households each year. Through 1990, the county is
expected to average almost 3,400 new units per year.
Between 1970 and 1982, building permit activity averaged 2082
units per ysskt• for the entire county. Of this, 67 percent were
for single-family detached units.
The following chart shows recent trends in County housing
construction:
S DENTON COUNTY HOUSING SU1fiARY
(JANUARY 1, 1984)
Total
County Estimated
Type Housing Yearly Housing Unit Completions County
of Units- Housing
Housing Final 4/118U 17TM Units
to to t~o~~ to as of
Cens.
4/1/80 12/31/30 12/31/81 12/31/82 12/31/83 1/1/84
COUNTY:
Single-Family 40,158 11046 1,228 1,221 29324 439390
Multi-Family 109519 504 1,034 583 2,596 16,013
Mobile Home 54 42148 82 72 211 407 3t325
825 l g632 2 334 2 015 5 327 63 328
01/15/85
Y y ~ 3 a ° r j9r'.di e++ inn ` i JJ- w r ~ r~ r v - 5
• B. City of Denton Housing Overview:
As of January 1, 1984, there were 11,351 detached single-family
houses in Denton, and 9,841 multi-family dwelling units. From
1980 to the end of 1984, Denton will have experienced a 10.4
percent increase in the number of single-family homes, and it is
anticipated that by the end of 1984 multi-family dwelling units
will have increased by 27 percent from 1980.
The following chart shows recent trends in City housing
construction:
CITY HOUSING SUMMARY
(JANUARY 1, 1984)
Total Housing Unit Completions Estimated
Type of Housing Housing
Housing Units to to to to Units
4/1/80 12/31/80 12/31/81 12/31/82 12/31/83 l/l/84
CITY 0
DENTON:
Single-Family 10,823 70 157 135 274 110351
Multi-Family 7,845 237 216 302 11241 9,841
Mobile Home 611 0 0 0 239 850
TOTAL 19,279 307 373 437 1 754 22 042
I
I
:L, ' „'M~ i ! ~1~.. 4p ti,~~ r fY a P w ~t. J ~i ♦ ~~i rqf y .~5. 'k. a~ < ~ t 2 St'~ 'fit 17 {5
b i ~i w: '.6 rs" ~ F
N~
C. City of Denton Housing Permit Activity:
Single Family Housing Permits
19801 - 1984
%400
L 1,300
pro 100
v %100
q
j %000
b 900
800
700
x 600
500
400
W 300
b1 700
• "Projected Tbtel 19e7 1 1964,
Multi-Family Housing Permits
lypp 1980 - 1984
1,400
1,300
1.200
D 1100
r 1000 f
900
7
O 90o
x
600
w wo
400
300
700
100
• 1980 t9Qf 1987_ -a "
1943 ~e4
'Projected 7btn)L
L-
r
D. City of Denton Housing Projections:
Decause of the high cost of housing, high interest rates, and
changing demographic patterns, it is anticipated that
multi-family (apartment, duplex, townhouse, condominium, mobile
home/modular housing) dwelling units will exceed the number of
single-family units in the near future. If single-family
housing construction averages a 2 percent increase per year and
multi-family housing averages a 5 percent increase per year,
multi-family housing will exceed single-family housing in Denton
by the year 1990. By the year 2000, 57 percent of Denton's
dwelling units will be multi-family. The following chart is a
projection based on the above assumptions:
CITY HOUSING PROJECTION
1984 - 2000
Year Sinple-Famil multi Family
1984 111849 Ins 41
1985 129085 10,543
. 1986 129326 119070
1987 12,572 119623
1988 129823 12,204
1989 13,016 122814
1990 130337 13,454
1991 13,603 140126
1992 130875 140832
1993 149152 15,573
1994 14,435 16,351
1995 149123 17,168
1996 15,017 18,026
1997 159317 18,927
1998 159623 190873
1999 150935 20,866
2000 16t253 21 909
+ r.wk ' i + ..y s n. e a G :i.. r 8. ...,r c P p i t ~~`✓f "t~ r r 't"?
• ECONOMIC CLIMATE: FACTS TO CONSIDER
A. Industrial Revenue Bond Program.
After May 22, 1987, it will be very difficult to obtain
Industrial Revenue Bonds because of new legislation. Other
sources of low-cost development funds will have to be found.
B. Industrial Zoning:
A considerable amount of land (17.15 percent of the city's
zoning inventory) is already zoned industrial, so there are few
requests for new industrial zoning.
C. Developed Land:
Denton has a higher than average amount of developed commercial
land, which reflects the fact that Denton draws from a trade
area that extends beyond its city limits.
D. Investment Funds:
Denton is now eligible for the Small Business Administration 503
Loan Program. Efforts should be made to make potential
. investors aware of this source of funding.
E. Building Activity:
Building permits authorized for business and industry for
1978-1984 are shown in the following illustration:
BUILDING ACTIVITY - CITY OF DENTON
1978 - 1984
YEAR BUSINESS INDUSTRY VALUE
1978 28 4 32,324,174.00
1979 48 5 71,556,446.40
1980 125 1 3504549504.09
1931 42 1 40,531,146.19
1982 36 3 3800610425.05
1983 36 12 129,1090659.53
1984 (Jan.-Oct) 50 5 109 514 581.0
01/15/85
9 `r
fG'F. Bank Activity Indicators:
Denton is served by five banks, five savings and loans, four
finance companies, and two credit unions. The Denton banks have
combined deposits of more than $383 million. The two Denton-
based savings and loans companies, North, Texas Savings and
Denton Savings Association, have combined deposits of more than
$214 million. Colonial Savings and Loan Association, First
Texas Savings Association, and Gibraltar Savings are branch
offices of Dallas companies. Below is a comparison showing the
increases in bank assets in the City of Denton from 1982 through
the first quarter of 1984.
DENTON BANK ASSETS
1982 - 1984
Institution ece er 1962 -Te-c-FEW March -1984
1st State Bank $1760816,000 $2509695,0DO $265,8409000
lst Denton Natl 89,537,000 87,893,000 7417390000
US Bank 47,610,000 62,498,000 66,386,000
western State Bank 13,093,000 20,4670000 23,209,000
Citizens Natl Bank 6,351,000 963870000 99365,000
G. Employment:
Denton enjoys a low rate of unemployment, a positive factor in
its general economy, but a negative factor in its eligibility
for certain funds, including the IRB program. Below is a
breakdown of average unemployment rates for 197E-1983:
INTEkGOVERNMENTAL COMPARISV OF UNEMPLOY144NT RATES
1978 - 1984
197B 1 98o - 984*
United States 5.F%44.. 7.1% 8.3% 10.19; 8.8fr 1.29ti
Texas 4.5.3% 4.5% 8.4% 8.6% 5.6%
Denton Count 3.3% 2.9% 2.9% 3.7t 5.49; 5.0% 3.0%
Denton 3.89; 4% 3.4% 4.39; 7.356 6.8% 4,1%
*Estimated
g- ~2 f y's. G 'f -FT r `
4409
1
• ECONOMIC CLIMATE: FACTS TO CONSIDER
A. Industrial Revenue Bond Program:
After May 220 1987, it will be very difficult to obtain
Industrial Revenue Bonds because of new legislation. Other
sources of low-cost development funds will have to be found.
B. Industrial Zoning:
A considerable amount of land (17.15 percent of the city's
zoning inventory) is already zoned industrial, so there are few
requests for new industrial zoning.
C. Developed Land:
Denton has a higher than average amount of developed commercial
land, which reflects the fact that Denton draws from a trade
area that extends beyond its city limits.
0. Investment Funds:
Denton is now eligible for the Small Business Administration 503
Loan Program. Efforts should be made to make potential
investors aware of this source of funding.
E. Building Activity:
Building permits authorized for business and industry for
1978-1984 are shown in the following illustration:
BUILDING ACTIVITY - CITY OF DENTON
1978 - 1984
YEAR BUSINESS INDUSTRY VALUE
1978 28 4 3233249174.00
1979 48 5 71,5569446.40
1980 125 1 3594540504.09
1981 42 1 40,6379746.19
1982 36 3 380061,425.05
1983 36 12 1291109,659.53
1984 (Jan.-Oct) 60 5 109, 514 581.00
.sk yY i A. Library Services:
1. Loss of External Support for the Librar : The County
eliminated a o is financial support for the Emily Fowler
Public Library in 1984-85, after decreasing its contribution
to $48,000 in 1983-84. Donations and State/Federal
assistance have remained relatively constant over the last
five years and are expected to remain so. The City's
contribution to library services has risen from 76 to 95
Sources of Funding for the Library
1980-IM
city
Ommy
Othw (DOMdana Min/reCw")
ti oox
SM
7M ~m+
K~
WN
pox
pox
30%
V%
% +ssah nrw 10H! V$-" aa-ae
1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85
i city 2689718 (76%) 3039600 (77%) 3801166 (78%) 433,615 (85%) 5811359 (95%) I
I County 60,619 (17%) 680161 (17%) 770516 (16%) 480000 (09%) 0 (0%) I
I St/Fed 40533 (01%) 50000 (01%) 4,230 (01%) 29500 (01%) 4,145 (01%) I
i Donations 209536 (06%) 17.380 (05%) 25,158 (05%)_23,831_(05%) 21,726 (04%) I
Total $3549406 $394,147 $4872070 $5079946 $6079230
Total* $354,406 $3562944 $428,605 $430,396 5490,401
*Constant 1980-81 Dollars
01/15/85
r
iw6 ,~iT a•~" „era. '~~~yP.,I-;'} F
R
brar Service Will Increase--Although total
• 2, Demand for Li
c rcu ation w 1 drops fight y n 19 85 due to the loss
of some 6000 County residents, the City's growing
population will soon result in steady increases in
circulation and registration$
City Resident Registration
62.426,
aoaoo f
I
I
8 i
90 f
f
43,000 436W
42,m
39.3M 40.u7
40= 34,40
3SAN
asooo 33.77
u 3~aT3
24699
Zk=
c~P) + 1033 64 2+ e.+6 +
Total Circulation
r:Q000 334A93•
330.000 !
320.000 !
TAM 1
300A00 !
290.000 f
!
MUM
2701000 f
260.000 ` f
f
290.000 247.519 f
244000
224.247
22451 f~
230.000
724000 217.349
;00%1,w +0.000 ~Q07
200A00
1!01000
Cr*mAm rift#A Is as 17 +
. k" „2 ~ Y P, ri Y r I f i 1 . tlrh l i y
i
r
• 3. Comparisons to Other Libraries: The following chart
compares the City of Denton to (1) a composite of all Texas
iibraries serving populations of 40-70,000, (2) a composite
of all Texas libraries serving populations of 70,000 to
110,000, and (-s) a composite of 4 "ideal" or "model"
libraries (Arlington Irving, Plano, and Richardson). The
first composite provides a measure of current performance,
while the other two provide examples of what we may strive
to achieve.
Cities Cities
a ected
Performance Measure Denton* 40,000- 70,000- Metroplex
70,000 110,000 Cities
Book Volumes 1100266 760996 1309189 162,554
Total Holdings 128,936 90,076 161,272 215,856
Total Holdings Per Capita 1.87 1.81 2.G2 1.95
Turnover irate of Collection 1.59 2.19 1.84 2.95
Book Circulation 204,007 175,203 2761361 5470484
Circulation Per Capita 3.03 3,46 3.40 5.24
Per Capita Tax Support* $**5.80 6.31 $5.48 $9.70
Book Expendittires* $37,604 $399869 $793828 $96,318
Reference Transactions 9,197 266717 322479 71,309
Full-Time Equivalents 20.5 15.9 25.5 41.5
*All 1982-83 Statistics
**1984-1985 is $11.22 Per Capita
4. Progress on Library Performance Indicators - 1980-81 to 1984-85:
1980-8111981-82 1982-83 1983-84 *T9-W-85
Total Holdings 134,188 128,936 989356 103,833 1069088
Materials Added 110960 90106 6,637 89576 71775
Non-City Patrons Registered 5,516 60424 7,458 80344 22000
City Patrons Registered 28,669 31,213 33,507 350696 379495
Registration as % of Pop. 59.7% 63.6% 65.6% 68.3% 69.0%
' Full Time Positions 16 18 18 17 21
Part Time Positions 3 7 7 6 2
Turnover Rate of Materials 1159
y-,'--sTMr, T~t• ,.r t ti vk y,s i, y w r...V yrar~gc;
r
5. Floor Spree: According to the American Library
Association, the minimum space requirement for a library is
0.75 square foot per person (39,000 square feet for
r'renton's current population). The present building has
25,000 square feet. Construction of a small branch library
or an addition to the present library may be necessary in
the future.
6, Citizen Rttin s: Citizen ratings of Library Services from
The 1984 zen survey were as follows:
19M 1983 1982 1 1980 '-TUF
Excellent 50,5 41,4 42.9 22.7 21.6 31.6
Good 46.0 49.3 49.1 58.7 59,6 50.6
Fair 3.5 8.4 7.5 14,5 17.4 13.8
Poor 0.0 0.9 0,6 4.1 1.4 4.0
7. Annual Circulation Comparison:
•
Annual Circulation Comparison
octobw 1963 - 9eptenibre 1964
Ar-- t
Mult aon-
SU~o
e Oth"
W3
WWWMWWMW4j
y's Ki ^P i n .:F w
8. Parks and Recreation Facilities:
1. Strategy for acquiring and developing park land:
Seek community r-upport (donations, property leases)
Take advantage of all available funding sources (General
Projects Fund, Capital Improvements Project Fund,
Community Development Funds, Recreation Fund)
Petition the state for Local Park Fund "matching funds"
(50/50)
Seek a tax increase or bond issue for additional
necessary funding
Take steps to rdapt and implement park plan once funds
are available.
2. Park Space Projections:
The following charts show the Parks and Recreation
Department's assessment of recreation facilities and open
ark space p in the City of Denton.
°°'t 9' a rt* (Ym
TIM
n y'
r d Y YS: ' tt i'r w ~.1
r
• FACILITY AND OPEN SPACE PROJECTIONS FOR
PARK'S MASTER PLAN
Estimated g r o off m eg ona o a
Po ulation Park Acres Park Park Acres Acres
Existin 47 1310 507
52,000 156 260 260 676
55.000 165 275 275 715
58B000 174 2"0 290 754
bl 000 183 305 305 793
64,000 192 320 320 832
• 6000 201 _ 335 335 871
70,000 210 350 350 910
*Neighborhood **Communixv ***Regional
acres M + acres + acres
10-15 acres
Playfields Athletic Fields Natural Areas
Play Areas Play Area Outdoor Recreation
Picnic Areas Picnic Areas Special Interest
Shelter(s) Shelters
Hard Surface Area Hard Suo Fa es
Area
Recreation
r 4~'v ! Y ~Y Y3.' 3 l~ ~'+Y i) t o•Am ~ ,.~Y F F v y:r ~W 4A: '~'~`ai
5r i.
•
COMPARISON OF EXISTING
PARK FACILITIES TO NATIONAL PARK STANDARDS
ZONE EX s n an ar hence
Zone 1 - Population 4488:
Neighborhood Park Acreage 5 13 -8
CoamunIt 40 22 +18
Zone 2 - Population 10766:
Neighborhood Park Acreage 10 32 22
Communit 0 54 -54
Zone 3 - Population 15532:
Neighborhood Park Acreage 0 45 -45
Communit 20 75 -55
Zone 4 - Population 10859.
Neighborhood Park Acreage 15 33 -18
Community 20 55 -35
Zone 5 - Population 4220:
Neighborhood Park Acreage 0 13 -13
• Communit 25 21 +4
Zone 6 - Population 62072:
Neighborhood Park Acreage 16 19 -3
Community 0 31 -31
*Neighborhood **Community *-**Regional r
acres Jf + acres + acres
10 - 15 acres
Playfields Athletic Fields Natural Areas
Play Areas Play Area Outdoor Recreation
Picnic Areas Picnic Areas Special Interest
Shelter(s) Shelters
Hard Surface Area Hard Surface Area
Recreation Facilities
a { .n,. 1!.. iy.~r_,~,~ r s .h4"J 3J s ✓{;2 4 Y ~a 7 ri ~ ~ ~YdL ~ M1:~
tl
COMPARISON OF DENTON
RECREATION FACILITIES TO NATIONAL STANDARDS
va a e cx s ng
OUTDOOR FACILITIES Goal Standard to Public Variance
Soccer Field 1/4,000 pop. 13 6 (7)
Football Field' , 5 (2)
Picnic 5helters pop.
cn c reas
Baseball anon
Lighted
Softball Diamond 1/7,000 pop. 7 5 (2)
`Lighted
Tennis Courts 1/2,500 pop. 21 18 (3)
Basketball ours
an a ac et a pop.
(4-Wall)
Play yeas
wo ourse pop.
18 hole)
ri1T_
Swimming Pool 1 2.5
e ar pop. 10 0 (10),
LLighted
rs esbo
a ge pop.
Lighted
Volleyball
Archery ange I/butwu pop.
Lighted
Shoo n`g Range TM-1001) Pop 0
INDOOR FACILITIES
Community Rec. 1/50,000 pop. 1 0 (1)
Center
District Rec. 1/15 ~000 pop. 3 (1)
Center w/gym
Senior „(0)
center er 1/50 low .
Swimming oP061 1/50,UUU pop. 1 (1)
0o r ucation pop.
Center
Based on 1983 COG population estimate of 61 ,700
9 Y
Pr = e to - w ' ~'.i • K
A. Fire Department
1. Number of Calls - As population has increased, the number of calls
for fire service has increased an average of 6.45 percent per year
since 1980. The number of calls for ambulance service has increased
1.5 percent pAr year. If the current growth rates are maintained
over the next six years, the number of calls for fire service will
exceed 3,000 per year, and ambulance calls will approach 4,000 per
year. The chart below displays projections of yearly calls for fire
and ambulance service:
Number of Calla Per Year
Firis and Ambulance Services ' l.tebuLen
Si000
4"
4A00
q Op 40 •
• ,
•
3'000
•
2.500 • A" ~
zm •
tsoo
tpOp
SM
+980 get W2 IM W4 +9ee Ves +981 V90 Ve9 V90
Ol /1 f /85
• 2. Response Ti -
mes As City population has grown toward the extremities
of the'Ctysresponse times for fire and ambulance services have
increased prop;rtionally. Construction of a new fire station will
help reduce future response times.
Response Tirnes t rare
d Fire and Amb,iiance services o ° ~~"bii1atir
~.S
40
•
3.S • • 0 ,
I _"00~ go 25
7
1.3
1
015
0
1980 981 987 1083 1994
3. Citizen Ratings -
Fire and .4moulance Service 'dtings
1964 Citizen Survev
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Fire Service 64.1 35.3 0.0 0.0
ambulance Service 56.0 36,0 4.0 4.0
4. Personnel -
Budgeted Employees--Fire Department
1980-81 19°142 1982-83 1983-84 1984-C6
Administration 3 3 3 3 3
Operations 90 90 90 90 90
Fire Prevention 3 3 3 4 4
t a F .T r 9 , G ,e q '7^~ x` e •t-ro 7,
"2. n y T M 77f °.EI'
J.
Anticipated ma,or budget expenditures for next 4 years -
1984-85
Three (3) additional personnel for new fire sub-station S 62,997
to be built in 1985-86
Land acquisition for new fire sub-station 606000
$122,997
1985-86
Three (3) additional personnel for new fire sub-station $ 660146
to be built in 1985-86
Place order for one (1) additional engine and equipment 240,000
for new fire sub-station
Add three (3) additional personnel to man ambulance 66,146
(no additional vehicle needed) $372,292
1986-81
. Three (3) additional personnel for new fire sub-station $ 699463
to be built in 1985-86
Place order for one (1) additional aerial type apparatus 4509000
(one (1) required for each 35,000 populati-n or major
fraction thereof)
Add three (3) additional personnel to man ambulance (no 699463
additional vehicle needed) 55880926
1987-88
Three (3) additional personnel to man ambulance $ 73,125
Place order for one (1) new engine and equipment 340,000
to replac.+ 1968 engine (1968 engine to be placed
as reserve engine) $4130126
ti
+a r "y v1 err ar +Y- 'ti 4 ..:~n i i5 Y , 4 y..,r r
•
8. Police Protection
At present, the department has an ex5ellent record, but as
population increases, it will need to be expanded in order to
maintain the quality of service it now provides,
1. Personnel
14 full-time licensed police office;i
11 civilians
15 part-time school crossing guards
2, Organization
Administration
Administrative
Patrol (54 officers, 4 dispatchers, 1 secretary, 2
civilian parking enforcement officers)
Criminal Investigation (14 investigators)
3, Crime Prevention
Public Service Programs (Operation I.O., security surveys)
Crime Prevention Education Program (2 police officers)
Decrease in major crimes 2,9 percent in 1983
Clearance rate 21.2 percent (national average 20 percent)
yi [`p 11 .y , r. 5r!"'~V 4 e V t
.xr v
•
C. Criminal Justice
The following charts show the activity of the Legal Department
for 1981 - April 1, 1984,
BOND PD PRIO DISM, CASES COURT --DMT-
YEAR FORFEITURE TO TRIAL REGULAR DISM. DOC TRIALS APPEALED
1981 1 356 10,589 800 1 685 264 272
1982 l t961 16 308 1 111 1,627 925 l s646
1983 5 883 19.669 5 133 4 881 1 110 [!4 t6381
*1984 55j 16 18968 1 745 275 CASES DISPOSED OFF
YEAR CASES DISPOSED OF
• 1981 14,966
19P2 21,078
1983 41j214
1984 20,621
(Jan-Apr)
PO - Paid fine
DOC - Defensive Driving Course
kG . M. t # ,s ~'fl x ~ J,~4 , ~ rr ! X t 16' { r 1 4 ,.r „c r fr f } y r~ # a ,a
w+1,? o ''7 i 1 r» Y. a c! d tsti t 'Y t i.. d i4ar it
h. ~ 'i t u t ,r . f+t r P51E.r V x~ I t
111 t.. f .x ,T a. 1 I 'gin. .FPS` ;1s
TRANSPORTATION AND GEOGRAPHICS
This section focuses on the possible forms of public transportation and
locations for transportation services within the City, Although at
present most people who need public transportation are receiving some
kind of service (SPAN, Handi Hop, taxi service, Transportation
Enterprises, Trailw4ys, etc,), it is probable that in the future, as the
population continues to grow and the City's boundaries continue to
expand, a public transportation plan will be required. As it stands
now, tiro groups of people have been identified as "prime transit
riders."*
A. Riders:
1. Those who are either too young or too old to drive
themselves or are members of a household with only one or no
automobile.
2. Commuters
With an increase in population, this constituency c%l d change
to include citizens who would use Kass transit for a variety of
other reasons.
6. Transportation Options:
• The selection of a transit system to serve Denton should reflect
an understanding of the needs of the citizens. Based on the
results of a feasibility survey*, two types of public transit
have been suggested:
1. Fixed-route, fixed sche?-jle (bus)
2. "Demand-responsive" transit, or door-to-door service
C, Service Areas:
1. Downtown Denton
2. Flow Memorial Hospital
3. Westgate Hospital
4, Denton Osteopathic Hospital
5, North Texas State University
6. Texas Woman's University
7. Denton Center
8. Golden Triangle Mail
*Source: Denton Public Transportation Feasibility Study
01/16/85
%
y~ P a ~4 ti 3f.^+y .d.~~.y' 7 , n y,y1 f ' F
~k 7,
75
r 4 "•""N'l ~ 7 1 i ' '
~$I, E
W A YS ENOINttR•D+PEC TOA
T Op f11GN g L OtBE4RY
STATE DEPARTMEN
ccklVISSI AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
aEa3AV KOU5;04 CH{IRMAN •rc~ is 75221
DEw{TT C GOEE4 80% SU67 11;111S~F
A S►4, W►1D400' Mine 1 t,
iN APO REFER TO
f+lE NO
.0-fear i'roject i~vclu~~cstt wtti
Control t'cs
L:ctu•~. T:,: .
EECEIsrI D
of our tN:parttxnt'S revised 20-Ye1r(proj state),
:lttachc~l is ;t `Opy Categtrict
ory 3 (primary, -hedulOs DcvelO-"'•ant{"lnc'tatel itpj,ALllitation) and fonrtl Cate
Category 2 tl! C S,vstt:m construction) for Dis 13.
Stat Setonc:1r} anc
• and Control an
of Near Vrojeet Development because of
0• ' .
,';e re%'isinn o the . h
tpt.rovcd in Oc. er>her, 19"' has c'en Made r.ccessary undarc:tirtation of proiect cos:, changes Stes in
::evct-'.&I factor_ t; and chin cs in Ccder.,i :
t)riorities and .cope of isro ee
lcgi.lIation- data
nor tncst: r,rojccts nave Uaen cet~`r+rined using for of
i:stintaud co: t: The revised s6"% ertt st antic ip
cst ►t li~hed for the ear 1019.
the varicu, ca ated
dc~clo~~ncnt in tegoric; arc to~.se 'pOn
r tnct~•ist ti,'~tsld ha co-se for revision e. the
' .;m• devi,+ticn
.tugging a..
Man.
~~al Status for Rehabilitation Pro~ra.
Urban SFStert
The current authorizati,m :atd nPpt'- ' ,rx"I ro ec:ts,
l,rojectS, ?cxa, Ftn1 to }',at'4ccc lto;lj 43et'enent :utd earn to
Progran projects, State ttiyl; a> } and projeca; inauded in te
Will remain of anger
:ctr>`et Rl,:td lrsprovement p ~graM projects,
Ak?. tS 7tu~e .a ad Fe~lcral iai-oce en ll iancou,ncludecd a for tegories these categories of work.
jl;4,ou5't scMdt+lcs have not b Our ,,s'tmQnt', revised
Plea,e advise ii ndlitio,ta' a~oC~ntrol t`lantis re4U ked•
20-Year projl%ct Uevelt pn i
Yours very tn.ly
` ttt't t I,. Yielding
Distria linginuer
Atta:hMOI%t -29-
r
I
PROJ£CY SUMMARY SHEET DISTRICT 10 I•»AI A1VARC10 U"IPC 1t1r VM
CA1t0011T I
_ 1#4+ •t
1 COUNTY Limits Will. IN CRISi !R0004CO IACILIII 1014111C It11lNtW0t1 IT R C0111
ST 1 11[Y4tIR1
(rl.I RAC. 110001 CLR ( 'JILLIONII
11►I V I Lot N M
LP F MT V R Y TV" ION I
I 1 0! L t
V ri0 1110 1 10t fi;
1A1[ IOW COW
1 f«I,r•t1 ff. Y. of K M 10.1 065 41'41 V/41 20.1 #a 10.40 1I11raq to Immolate ttadar/a. •
14 I• IM•t CIL 12.2
I Beat" It. Fit 7040 to 0.0 141 4/161 K it 10 10 10 64.1 floor Cr1. #a 0 1.40 0.01 vWx 41141141 tl#.Vy, oft". !1
HL 04a 1. NI. 1. at 01 IF MID tRI. TIJs#r hl. 150 an# • ll1M90011N1e4 alr•tt•w# 0
►A
Tlo►u elk.
4#11#1 OIL
VC 11%bot Clio.
10 S to 1010.
61
• M . • • •
1 Dula 1t. 1 119 14 0.7 4101 1.41 111w14.11•a, 010•ly 6•1 t1
671 Tatl4at CIL 111 /rllm.tl". It
SSS I1
. . . . . .
2 ball" to. 1. al "s 110 1.10 Allltl.nal .ertae•..tr•et##e•.• 111
150 Ild. fell 1•ra/
to 1. 61 tttl It.
co",
. . . .
1811" Goal C•larll• or. ..IV !.!1 C•.erara 001144 ►•rrt•t. Kt 160
15R 1171 •Verlgr 004 •Ir•el•r# •14#•104.
.
i '
tllrtltt lot tat 1#.11 0.17
1•`4.11 ~y
"OJECT SUMMARY SHEET asrecr ~I
c►ittonT s•Twl avilanlnq Ian.
r.H l .r t
I111T0 LOTH opt twist M0l0lt0 ►ACtl1IT fll►//IC
tall fAC. 110001 ltruCTY11i! Tt Oolt COltlr~
' ITN T Ing PM Y T I M ClA Il rtll10t111 RIYA401
MO M0. tm T TOT LOC L
MOM Il CIL of it. Ilt Arl11 1 TATI x011 CONY.
~i
CIL O.N
` ;no A/I111atwl z
N» • 1 1011 IN
IN !1O .....1000 15
f0 N/il woo . ...N........
L O." 0.11 left area.
.
l 100!1" ff. . 19. 34
~ table IN CIL 1►1 e• fw 11. Ili Of .
10
0 .
•
N
. .
ti' ! 101IN as(~ @UOwI ovoid fail lot ~
rt. 1 171 t0 N so . N1/r
N O.I o...... ..t0 r rirhu0
. f rr A//1!10101 otters fail for 5.
.
t! Owtw 1 )w r. is N• . . . .
Ilr Y!/! 0014 7 rirp0a0.
........................N......
/A/IIItM.f 1"I'lfell•1.f...»
1 11110 ulel 46
r. Mrarr• C/L l0 Of. 111! /1110 t rul/,ut.
41 0011" CIL e, 11
NIItl0r01 1.4014 1411 let .
I 00t1N h. firNel CIL la fr. M Well hrhue.
N All It.
uu... •..•N............. .NU . X0.0) • .tm film In.
I 01110/ II
1M• 1. AntO• CIL • _
MIIN rf. 0.17 101 n0a
184
0111•/ CIL 9.1 N N is
Off
10 Fatlof IM 0 1" 0 R OIA Valley vim 1.10 ..............Y
I 0 R N11A 14eLtaref 01. 00vlnet N/It1anal Iarl fly
I PC Alt. 11710 Whimr0llaa.
1 Jfl
.wn ; 0' OtA Solt Llr
.r MC 010rttIN
Cob.
.•rw+ KA WU-Attr►fl
i N I{MY III
r;~; ..s.....+..... I ba0aa
IOU A e. LL !1.
It. 1. of of IIf tf
f!r to I ! NI. r. of
rll N1 0.17 •1011 na•
r: Ie
bit"
r. of to /a r,
10./
..u .N.. u. .u.u u.•NU...• I •I•k •1l1Nf 'too I
~ I
ONute1 IL u1 11.11 O,It'
a: ~ . ' 1~r.Jf I
• . •
r'
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET COST RICI is 1.111At ItTTI11C ICH=U
feet of !
1 COl"' LIMIT! M lot It19T ►110►01t0 FACILITYric ) tTt1Ut?uM Tl no GOBI
ITS IML1 /AC. L ll Ci0 1 MILLIONlI AlMAII!
I LOUT109 no, T Tot L FI
Tr►f tr0 " fY►t
TAtt ROM CONlT
Callao r. f of Ino► it .t o /11 01. t IT u O.N 0.10 t~oote•el roollowro fro.for• SI
! to t of 111 /)s A IA"
U toot lilt fool of loop it.
e Its Ioct
took
tfw ~
• .a Y.... .N.•• 1 of Last
M.. • • • • •
Callao f. rl 113 to .t 33 of 1).s AI 11101e4
Y IT
111 Tonwt CK
Ar '
. .
9 Dallas r, • of Mit Ltoo 0.0 111 0119 4?11rt II l0 TI 03.4 nj up kit Llr Y I&M tilt) 5.10 pe•t•o lot•,rMop• It
is) 1101 to t of tell 110. Y 60 14111 I
u Ltw I10,OOn, p A.
tnd
0411460 re. of )M is 41.1 112 Y tie. In. • 1.10 flrnlol •
Is ally Mlle to orygo tr of
1 .
u Lit
. .
Itl Mliw fr to m ~ HL ).I /1146 A2 40111 It Tk 0o 0.1 pntu Cush of t Lilt) ills IT
11 1 1 1 p1A IM 1010 1 t ,1
to
. .
n Deal on fr. oil )Mt to 1.0 Litt IQ on It Is l 12.6 tit unlit hto! 1 1.11 1111 LH )1
III r .I rM lilt 100 IC 011 TO 111 t
IsT1
.....................,~r..
of 060064 rr. tR 111 A At 0.6 of r IF is l0 1 l 11.0 ttJ bt 1.00 AHltlaol uao t Ift IAINIks- is
103 Iq 1 to 9 bw Ti3 tJ flaw
TAr of tie Fork trlA/e w 1
. 6...,............
. 1•iN-M
3 i
10
• •
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET 011111141' t 4.1W ItTt1kC «+aw
. CAT10IIAf
► of I
LIMITWit IN 11111L 0 FACILItT lt"tUI1[1 TT "IF C011!
0T1jt"TV
IMI.l FAC. CLA
TYPE toLis 0901 rvln 11Y Tell EMIR; L Tot
TTOf TTH •"r TA1t a" OMIT.
N I
i II Rawfus t. N of 11 10 Ot )r it f .1 Ill 10 ! .!1 trade separation >1
e / to to N PC 14 fANltioul lttrrtrnl
AF
r.
■ star toter moef AM w 1.1 to tier load to St Coortrut CLar leFOUtleea 1•
14 rtAor Lead S.4 rtlnr eel Kati
A! tlwt elect
...........Y••.• w..• • .
tad r. FN lilt to 1.1 to IM at is 12.4 rot Belief so h 1.11 40
It of FN YA T '7 Ito Fork ft
AF D rt At lift
1 new r. V !X 944 1.1 11 1Q a 11 1 1.1 ts Fit 411 to .11 0.61 41
e~e>• to ! FN 411 426"
. .
1144 to TrN• N IM 1.1 1C4 a It if .1 left irk so 20 .IQ 0.34 Al
! to Collis CIL
AO
I. M.... Y« • .
Idle r. bill, lot to 4.7 441 to 44 I1 10 5.1 IWIC "%if to .a 0.11 rd
H of Ierlle fw of It
Y hpf >1 tk hood
eat
• ......w» • • «u•. • • •w• • w• 44......... y.,•.
milli fro 1.0 W. 1 of 1.0 1N to V 11 1.0 .lard t1t to QQ 1.0 4.11 110,000. • I.A. 11
111 trader ytir4o to 0 s .L 09 Little Ifee• fb
As neor on of @oil turd Creel
low
.
1.1:1•H t
i
' PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET partner tl A-wm Uftm karu
CAttOOAy"'7-
one oowty 1,011110 LOOK IIe flat P00001t01ACILAV tllfw0± stRUCtllRtl TV am l 11l"WORll PILUANKS
Lit (111.1 M. CLA
y rY I tot LOCAL
.
type
trft M. tAtt ftif olat
00
Collis h• IN 15 to 0.1 !.l pit to Ia I! I 0.6 1143 1.l0 O.tO it
tt.. l
t00 rll• 59161011 CP
IAI LU
Y••N• M•.•••..... N N•1 N••••••••• • •
Ont« no V IN 1.1 1I6 Ia 6011 11 11 l 11,1 lot tY u 1.11 0." 0.10 N
loo ~r+ l0nteal 10 a 11 e0 1 I ' ?S
FAP
•N.. ••N•N• ••...\\•.•.N• • •N. ww•. I•••• .••7••
•N M • • •Y.
dllu /t. 0.1 la. I:f 6•1 111 IO ea It to 11 1 10.1 0 III: Last IN"% 1 11.10 1.01 H
too 11 sl to blow nt rtlo!t/ slier I
AP too to VC All sreoel
. N.. N N. N....... • • • •i• N• • •
eta" R• V IM to el 1.e 111 Its IOt It 11 10.1 Lelleee CrNI It." 0.11 to
!a •••r- 1LO IS lit t 0 CP e duet trea 1
u tyl VC 1lee*eaa CA
VC flo I.a
111a1tt Llwr
eta Pert
11t■1ty Llwt
VC Us /0t!
' Ttldtl fol.
0u 01 to
N• •N•
• 1 f • •.e.• N .N•..r.•••NN•.• •.N• w•.. •N•/• •1Y. • ••Y.1 • • •
If ,
t v, !MAMA h. eti0wl r 2.1 101 sl 400, U 10 L LL Ip. BIA n m tN 9.14 1.11 110.000. • B.A.
!M e""" tonioa at o0 o k ii u1 nt u t
et 1M r r to m as BOB TM 111 JA
• rr u.••• .N •Mr••N~J... •.uw u••. ...N. .N .N .u . . .u•...•..... •u . . ......•.......•....u.~..N Nu
. .
00
b "Iles ft. I III 1 to till BejolelI~t of Old to to
H oak" rlotloo is !0 L (Nlleeq U MM
/AP e0 tetHll
•IMN.. .....6........•N• ••N• •N .N. • N• •N• •.N.••...•.•....•./•...•..•...••
1.11 0.u e.f0
M talt0a hs a N 10 1.1 la 4m is 11 11.1 IL MI *t It
11 hop. li I 3~ CI Veinet ret
►Ar
N.o NuNN N NNNNNN •uN •u••. ••.N. . . .u••u•... .•N u•. .u•. ....•...NN.•........ N• .•u •N•
1.11bl1 IL
I.
• J, , v
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET asrlllcT Is s•nu orvtw
gCOMU
Mp lef►
stfC COUNTY LIt11TO LOIN ft! exist pooftwo►Act&III IRA►►lC
IW 1 IAC. tl owl 110mu■ell n WW costs
type t y ttK L ! CLO t MILLIONS! ■e11Apas
r . M to Type • I tOt L k
aIe r 3111 It it 1,1 Lott Now cONst.
It roleae to Ill 11 1p 00 it 16 0.6
At ILy U I ,f SO
„ tl
■ valor, er m . 41 1.3
. . . . &am !I ulueo to rN f3■ 13 1 It
/
1 0 1'0 rI:t creek •e 13.11 0.31130,000 e,A,
rtar !root
list
bot Cleot
elife 13
Boot !sash
ovall Crook
. . Relief ft
Ion Creek
■ if0 loll poll"
ft•t1 314 1e lO.1 f14 NL /A 11 y, L•
is o 't 6
t 0 1C 50.00
• fat
111 tattoo r. TO t0 4e 1O 11.0 Sts 4 40 I1... Ft omata leads
.
.
ll1
set Sim e► 1 Yoe 0.00
u>r K r4anta0e 1eNe )It
I11 ft! lot pr. N of 1o tr 1.1
• 1303 „ R 1111 13
11 1
All k +1 Ole It u te• 1.10 (,10 Tsnlael 041110x• to fs ewoer. lsk
u by tM hate, hfllM frolece4l 3
Ilc Namtam Cob Nil 13 Cor1o of [o■1oe#le Ie
• •.u.. u. Will roollaL
!b 001110 ►a. n to 1 10
I.s ......r.........
t'#•►eer elt !It !t1 ICR It 1 t 0.1 p,~
tot 13p 1~ tee 0.10 O.sS 110.000.. I A. no 34
. .
h1 e.*tj d sriw efL a /.s l .
M I3
tot 4 0 Act 0•1 tK +o21AN1 td 11.ff 0.11 kAt eroulrl Ioi:ti•t1 (15 Miles) Lt1 "'t 0!1 Vs 1t3 1)
u 14? u t1d1
ve to$* :1111
• w "4411#111 tit
YC PAIII. f le gal
. n... .,Lw u•.. 1...........••.11 r
PROJECT 311MMARV SHEET mlitKr Il S•7t1A Kv'ttmmxt ttxl0tu
tAtlOOllr`7r
oelall
1 t01JM1r limits IOtN NI 1x1!1 0110►oIEO IACItitT tIIAPIlC ST"I'vell TT 4011 COLTS
Ifs (YI) IAC, 110001 CLss t mIKL10MS) 11LYAssaI
T Mt * Y TV" tOCATION t 101 LOCAL
00 110 tt►1 eRr s1A41 (IOTe .OMIT
sell" h. to SIS t to 1.1 101 40141 6f1N I1 I'm 111. f tt•avad Cr of 12 !tall US
A taq►all ID
S Coll!• Parker A6. to Ile I 0t !
As 16 we hotel$ Crt
C4 national U
1plas elk
.IA rM S44
0alllo rt. Dolt" VL to Id fCt 40 It 76 r 4.1 VC Cro#A oo 1.10 0.K 0.10 U
>t tte 0 le" 1 .9 We Naaootl Croak 7
AO
N•.• • N•.•• Y»•• • • •
title Fr. Mows 1:11, 1.1 Its He an it is I 1. to- We West Soap elk Tar 1.11 0.11 110.000. lass. 51
•1 to 1.0 VA. 0 or a Au 10. Sot Clark ISO
Y rlA1aa16~ AN VC btlaarwd
hNk
M.••.r .N••N./••. •N... . • • .
A o.lll. h. 1.4 PH. A of 1.1 Ill less ld It t r 0.1 rat 1.11 0.14 SI
1
is Woe IdN t• 1t far a.
AI ford. L A
N... •INW. • •N/.. • •
M #1110 It. Jdrr.. CIL 4.1 441 to 414 I1 to I 1.1 ON: 1Mrtal. Cob pa 1.10 0.11 t10,0M. • 6.4. 14
lot to It o/ IOJlotlla. 0 •.'q 1P.t We loaf &SA 1f.
r~ • UN..N L..N r.YN». N. N.r NN» N..'.... N.. .M• •N• •..\•/1/,,.U •1. •.U• • u•u•..u•••........
0.1 $41 100 Sm l1 lA a 11.6 1.5/ 0.10 61
it Oaltn ft. Demote 19 of it a1
IA
tf
M•....• •.N.•.•..»....• N.... ..i.
V %M" M. /M 611 to 4.0 161 JL 4" 11 4 11 0 OL l4. 911 rm 11M Its th 11.11 cu 114
Ill less 0 k i~ 01 to, If. FSb
R WA M " to
11
N..I•. \..Y/.,N\.»•.•.• N..• N...• • • N•
M OnIM ft. UI 1111 1o fA ft% 4C2 11 11 11 t 8. 5 LL. AN ATL1r IR reT 104 11.1 0 0 IS
tl~,
114 gibe CIL i 0 AH If. MC Patriot Cr1 it
to A11 vt Veal SloulS
CS rn 116
•H• N•M~ •.....N.MN•.N• .•a •Y.• MH• H• •e•• ..N• b.• .b ..•.u . ♦u•. ••1..• ••u
r
• 1.111.10
. e
j. .
PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET otstete♦ l1 s tTU otvtletx rt etma:v
tATt00lt ~r
page 1 of 1
tekArra - costs
rt t"IT Llllltf Letts IPI Exist P~OPOltOYAClilft (1000) It1M1etu0ts ell IOIr 1 YI1il0eNl IltwAtf
sTl. iw.l ►lc.
Lk~INIMICIFfti I Ttrt o +ott !i/ tol 1.6C At
TYPE " ti0 hIt r,• tAtt 1100 owf1.
tsao q
.
us aeeos rt. us m to I.a 111 1* ea k1 1 r 4. ve Lug W11#411 0.11
110 roll!s tit p 1 Or► Ill1~e t
AP its vc uttl• II• ~`IM
will Il11p
VC Jews or Ifts
slereN It.
to Oa trlfp
u... . • .
M Osltlo rt. h.tea,ch 1.1 111 to 02, It 1 r 1.6 u Ii 10► Toe U2 2.15 0.15 00
110 to is III ACr I. 110
TAr i►0
61 • dentin In. 1.11 111. 1 of 1.01 OL Gw it is I OL d vs 1o tee 11 1.01 •.1/ 0.10 Is
fi M 10 to tettell 1 oe ii iLL TOP IO I
PAP to NO Neat ate.
. . .
•
.
111t1t is 1,410,1
' 1.111.11
n~Aa
J1
3
r
• INFRASTRUCTURE
A. City Streets and Drainage:
Number of miles of existing streets 205 miles
Percentage of streets needing repair 35%
overlay 25%
. rebuilding- 10%
Number of miles of street added annually 7 miles
Number of miles of existing drainage channel 35 miles
Number of miles of existing tribute channel 20-30 miles
Number of miles of unimproved drainage
channel 25 miles
Number of existing bridges 96
Number of bridges needing repair 10
. Number of houses that flood each year
27
8. City Water and Sewer Lines:
Total Total
System Lines
Existing Lines Proposed Lines Aeplacesent Lines Replacement Anticipated
1984 1984-1989 1984-1989 ias of 1989 1989
Mater 241.96 mi 32.20 mi 7.82 mi 2.85% 274.15
Sewer 210 ■I 20.11 ■1 6.25 mi 2.723 230.11
Fire
Hydrants 1,259 369 N/A g JA 1,628
01/15/85
Ii TI I I
-T -7-T C
Y'"aF?r't.._~ xf 'tti ;•~tl'iM y~J r.:'+a~i 56 :,•u r~. Yr:,.
• C. Pump Station/Treatment Plant:
The map on the following page shows the possible locations of
the new raw ,rater pump station and the new water treatment plant.
Without a clear picture of future population density, it is not
possible to plot the location of additional water systems.
0. City Water and Sewer Main Lines:
Total es T984 199 *2000
Water Main Lines 241,96 273.41 321.80 387.13
Sewer Main lines 210 230.11 278.43 336.02
*The numbers shown are sufficient or a city population o
100,000.
**See the map on the following page for the location of water
mains and existing storage facility.
w % d Y~. ~ ~ .r~~ a rim ,a f, a a n. s 'Ni g r i ~ L Y t;A
• Y '
r
WATER MAINS
l EXISTING STORAGE FACILITY`
i
"tiff le
d^ 6~ d i y
1~ y
m J
~ ~ • 4 Q y ~ v y i i ,
1 A ~ +-Y . R ~ i t
tia s
0 ' ~ W YY ' ! 7~b~ ►
rev t
• UNIV,ERSI Y DRIVE ► '
McKINNEY
~ s y s, n r ► 5
AIRPORT R „ aI~ a
: t a ~ ° ~ ~ YM
~ ► 1 ~ L s
Y ( til
i ~
-v r f y,~s 1
s' r
r
41
5 w
S
y
CITY Or
DENTON, TEXA S
~1't1 n.r u warn - Z r ALTERNATE NA 3
ONOwrr COMPUTER U*X MAP
ow
• boom fuumftwiw NOOAN a IIASOA, LYa
v'....'•
' S 1 , 1 as
NEW VAT IN
TREATMENT
sutTIN Wit [1 PLANT \
I Ir ra I I:?I~ NG+I
%
~W RAT/ WAY R . '
I; I F 4,1 ~f STATK*l -i~t .•1
t 41A
't
NEW RAW WATE
I'•°-J rf PuMPSTAIIUN li.i. •lrl.ti
{ 1 ! , C, M
I ,
• • 1
CITY OF DENTON
DESCRIPTION I
NEW WATER TREATMENT' PLANT RAW WATER SWPLY
LOCATED NEAR NORTHERN 90L*WY SYSTEMS
Of CITY IN UPPER PRESSURE PLANE,
FEo BY RAW WATER PUMP STATION ALTERNATIVE Nb.T
ON RAY ROBERTS RES.
' ~ /RtPMt1_Ir /Rl I
a f 7 r4a~ -r- i ,x ie.g. 4 d k 1 1 ^ .b.: V a yr i". 'r^p ?r a
E. Electric Facilities:
The following chart shows projected increases in facilities to
allow for a population increase of 48,000, from 52,000 to
100,000 for the period from 1984 to 2000:
Year 1984 1990 1995 2000
Population 520000 68,000 84,000 1000000
Peak Demand MW 150 197 243 290*
System Load GWH 608 795 92 19168
Meters 2207700 29,627 36,484 432340
Miles Overhead Line 252 285 318 350
Miles Underground Line 40 80 120 160
Distribution 59325/347 6/443/431 70561/515 80680/600
Transformer/MYA
Substations 7 0 11 11
Substation Capacity 195 215 225 225
69/13.2 KY MYA
Substation Capacity 75 100 125 150
138/13,2 KV MYA
Substation Capacity 260 300 400 400
138/69 KV MYA
Street Lights 3,800 4,567 51334 61100
"cm to ees 103 120 137 154
*Additional generation and power supply will be necessary when
projected peak load exceeds 235 MV.
14
CITY FINANCES
Protections of Revenues And Expenditures to Year 2000:
The following analysis is an estimate of General Fund Revenues and
Expenditures through the year 2000, The estimates were developed by
employing a trend-line to the latest Five Year Financial Forecast.
These estimates are presented on the following chart. Revenue
estimates are presented for each of three scenarios. Expenditures
are assumed to be the same in each scenario.
Scenario I assumes that the current high rate of growth in assessed
valuation and population will continue throughout the forecast
period.
Scenario II assumes that the current rate of growth in these areas
will slowly decrease.
Scenario III assumes that the current rate of growth will rapidly
decrease to a level equal to the historical average.
01/15/85
a .
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES
THPOUGH THE YEAR 2000
•
REVENUES EXPENSES
SCENARIO I SCENARIO It SCENARIO III
1984 15,240,312 15,2409312 15,240,312 15,062,922
1985 17,998,894 17,614,212 16,831,884 16,363,443
1986 19,3851068 18,390,216 17,663,024 18,012,023
1987 21,621,700 19,507,723 19,117,569 190785,817
1988 23,85:,453 20,806,241 20,494,147 200977,072
1989 26,186,927 22,451,821 22,227,303 22,160,319
1990 2881696597 23,6760866 23,3339335 23,837,099
1991
i 30 299 465
25,0129612 24,686,943 25,297,146
1992 32,429.333 26,348,359 26,040,551 26,757,194
• 1993 34,559,201 27,684,105 27,394,159 28,217,241
1994 36,689,069 29,019,651 28,747,767 29,677,288
1995 38,818,937 30,355,598 30,101,375 31,137,336
1996 40,948,805 31,691,344 31,454,983 32,597,383
1997 439078,673 33,027,090 32,808,591 34,057,431
1998 45,208,541 34,3626836 34,162,199 35,517,478
1999 47,338,409 359698,583 35,5150807 36,977,526
2000 49,468,277 37,034,329 36,869,416 38,437,S73
*Expenditures are based on estimates derived from a fonwula utilizing
consumer price Index information,
•
t~TlS~ F ,`si Pd °F F } .Y I" Y Fr t. iti, ,r~~ d w o y
t ZFK. :3 1''.' ti, `7, d w .~r s7 a .%`o •5. } .d
CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE
The following information is taken from the 1983 Denton Citizens` Survey
and shows how citizens rate City services. The survey compares citizen
responses for the years 1979-1983.
A. Streets: 1979-1983 Slightly more than half said the streets
have "many bad spots." A large percentage say they favor a tax
increase to improve streets but only a few would accept an
increase of more than $6.00.
8. Library Services: 1979-1983 Half rated the library service
as "good."
C. Park and Recreational Facilities: 1979-1983 There was a
gradual increase from 56 percent to 63 percent who rated the
parks and recreation facilities as "good."
D. Garbage Collection: 1979-1983 Approximately 80 percent said
the City had never failed to pick up their garbage.
E. Emergency Services: 1979-1983 The Police and Fire
Departments and the ambulance service received consistently high
ratings of "good and "excellent." F. Neighborhood Safety: 1979-83 There was a decrease in the
very safe category, from 46 percent to 33.2 percent who felt
their neighborhoods to be very safe; there was an increase in
the "somewhat safe" category, up from 29.8 percent to 41,6
percent, A considerable percentage believe their neighborhoods
are "somewhat unsafe" (14 percent) or "very unsafe" (10 percent
approximately).
G. Animal Control: 1982-1983 Almost half rated the service as
"good."
0519s
"
01/05/85
'PIT 1~ I "r
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1985
The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil
. Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart: Mayor Pro Tem Chewr Council Members
Alford, McAdams, Riddlesperqer, and Stephens
ABSENT: Council Member Hopkins was absent due to illness
1, The Council received a presentation of the management
letter from Arthur Andersen and Company, the City of Denton auditors.
Mr. Bill Dillon, representing Arthur Andersen and Company,
distributed the Memorandum on Accounting Procedures, Internal
Control and Related Matters to the Council.
Ms. Juana D•anielsp representing Arthur Andersen and Company,
presented their findings and recommendations. The following report
was made egarding the payroll function.
A. Overlapping responsibilities:
Both the Payroll and Personnel departments had the
capability to modify the employee master file
The Payroll and Personnel departments had difforent
iund decoding schemes
The effect was one of confusion, time lost in converting
codes, no segregation of duties, and inconsistencies and
inefficiency,
B. Lack of timely approval:
Kodifications were being made without approval
• The effect was errors.
C. Length of payroll processing cycle:
The processing cycle presently lasted over 2 1/2 days
'rne effect was a burdensome investigation and correction of
errors, plus errors in the payroll.
0. Timeaheet errors:
Ttmesheets were being submitted with errors
Tne effect was inefficiency and delays in month-end and
year-end closing as well as untimely Information to user
departments.
A report was then ,iven regarding internal control.
A. Overall management controls:
1, consideration should be given to a direct deposit
payroll system for employees
2, the Motor Pool Fund was not reporting depreciation
3, there were unrecorded liabilities and no search
wag being done for these
regarding lease accounting, there did not exist a
readily accessible list of leases: the
recommendation was that management establish a
schedule
5. staff should watch for recurring journal entries
-,R ~ Ye ° vv ra, 'a vG.
City of Denton City council minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Two
• e. Cash and investment management:
1. no check limit currently existed
2. investment records had not been kept current
C. Accounting for property taxess
the City needed to improve the property tax collection
to as to improve cash flow
0. Utility system:
1, there Should be separate reporting for each
utility
2. records should be kept on interest charged during
construction, as required by FASB
3. problems were being experienced with the utility
billing system during meter changes
4, there was not adequate information regarding the
work order budget versus the actual amounts
Me, Daniel concluded by reporting that the internal audit function
would address matters of concern and compliance with policies and
procedures.
Mr. Dillon stated that overall, the inter,tal controls for the city
were strong. He further stated that thought should be given to an
internal audit position with the city.
. Mayor Stewart asked about the cost of such an internal audit
position.
Dillon responded that the cost would vary and would depend on what
the Council and staff determined should be included in the
responsibilities and duties of the position,
Mayor Stewart stated that many of the functions of an internal audit
position was what the city paid Arthur Anderson to do.
Dillon replied that the internal auditor could look it financial
aspect& in depth as well as non-financial issues such as assuring
that the city was receiving accurate franchise payments from the gas
company, etc.
2. the Council considered approval of proposed sign ordinance
provisions.
Mr, Charlie Watkins, consultant, began the discussion of regulations
for portable advertising signs and the termination portion of the
proposed ordinance. A canvass has been completed of 01 other
cities's regulations for portable signs. From a sampling of 15
cities of comparable size, 7 did not permit portable advertising
signs at all and the rest regulated them to different degrees. The
proposed regulations for Denton would prohibit flashing lights cn
the portable signs. There also was a requirement that the signs had
to be anchored so as not to create a safety hazard during stormy
weather. Tha proposed maximum size was 72 equate feet. A
regulation was also proposed that no person or place of business
Should have more than 1 portable sign of 72 square feet or 2 mote
than 25 equate feet on-premises. The purpose was to reduce the
number of this type of sign in any one location, in concoct with
this purpose, a proposed regulation was that a 450 fast spacing
should be maintained between signs.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that he '01 a problem with businsases
being permitted to only have 1 off-premise sign.
City of Denton City council minutes
meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Three
Council Member McAdams stated that she did not like any of them.
• Council Member Alford Mated that he saw the issue from two
perspectives - aesthetics and business.
Council Member Riddlespecger stated that he despised to see streets
full of signs.
not Stephens stated that he felt too
statements byh C regucliation ti Member
worse ilthan Membe-:
McAdams and Mayor Pro Tem Chew, he felt that if enough people did
not like to see the signs, that would take care of the problem.
order and repair. like to regulate that the
Stephens
were kept further in stgood ated
signs Council e McAdams
that a city employee inspect the iportable r siyns pto ninsure
that they were in good repair.
Council
specifiedMthatrthetBuildingrInspector would inspectrthessigns~dinance
Mayor signs being r located stated at the same intersection. or 7 of the portable
felt was too strict 450
test Council Was approximately n 1 112 stated miles h Which he proposed
t
mayor Pro Tam Chow stated that he had a problem with limitiag the
number of off-premise signs.
Mayor Stawart asked if 4 off-premise signs would be acceptable.
The consensus of the Council was to increase the limit of off-
promise portable advertising signs to 4.
Council Member Rlddlesperger stated that he was opposed to having
the portable signs too close together.
Watkins stated that the suggestion in the proposed ordinance was 450
feet apart.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that he felt that was too far and
suggested 100 feet apart.
The Council recognized Cliff Reding.
most that portable 250sifeet apart eat spacing to be placed on
Me, lots Rand nsince stated
of 250 feet would solve the problem.
at 250 e feet. spacing requirement
The consensus fthe ttising council signs was
between portable advo
Watkins then reported that he had been contacted by Me. 'Slick'
Smith requesting that he be allowed to place portable advertising
signs in multi-family zoning districts.
The Council recognized Mr. Cliff Reding.
Mr. Reding stated that he had a quertion regarding the limit of
signs 25 square feet and larger for on-promises as all portable
signs were 32 square feet in size.
Acting City Attorney .Foe Mottle clarified that the proposed
ordinance would permit 2 portable signs of not mote than 25 square
feet on-promises or 1 sign of mote than 25 square feet up to e
• maximum site of 72 square feet,
7 777
City of Denton City council Minutes
meeting of January 150 1985
Page Four
. Watkins then stated that the proposed sign ordinance called for the
abatement of all off-premises portable advertising signs in 5 years.
Council Member Stephens stated that he felt this section should be
deleted from the ordinance. The Council could see how the other
provisions worked out and staff could bring the abatement section
back at a later date,
Watkins stated that the proposed ordinance would require that all
non-conforming signs must conform within 10 years, The state
legislature might act on this issue during the next session.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if the Council was going to alluw
the legislature to make this determination,
Mayor Pro Tem Chew stated he felt that if a sign deteriorated, it
should be taken down but if the sign were in good repair, it should
not have amortized,
Council Member McAdams stated that amortization was not unusual at
all.
Council Member Stephens asked why the Council should set a
termination time we they had deferred the abatement provision
earlier.
The consensus of the Council was for a 10 year amortization with 2
Council Members against.
J. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments, No
official action was taken.
• The Council then convened into the Regular meeting at 7;00 p.m. In
the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart: Mayor Pro Pem Chewr Council Members
Alford, McAdams, Riddlesperger, and Stephens
ABSENT: Council Member Hopkins was absent due to illness
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of December 180 1984 and the Special Called Meeting
of January 3, 1985.
McAdams motion, Chew second to approve the Minutes as presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
The Mayor then presented a Proclamation honoring J. Newton Rayzor,
2. Consent Agenda
McAdams motion$ Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
A. Bids and Purchase orders:
1. Bid 1 9377 - Motor controller
2. Bid 1 9379 - Steel retaining wall
3. aid 1 9381 - Modular furniture for Accounting
4. Bid 1 9384 - Vibratory rollers
S. PurchaL, Order 1 66190 to Boyd Excavation In the
• amount of 17,020.00
6. Purchase order 1 66666 to Boyd Excavation in the
amount of 87,020.00
11 lei 1,
;.r X
r -
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Five
• 3. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Myers Development Corporation requesting an amendment of planned
development (PO-12) on an approximately 78 acre tract located on the
west side of interstate 35-C approximately 2,500 feet, south of State
School Road. The currently approved plr..ined development permits the
following uses: Hotel and Restaurant Site, Office Jite, Recreation
Area, Cultural Center. -the proposed amendment includes the
following land uses:
Cluster Homes - approximately 80 unite on 13.2 acres
with a density of 6 units per acre
Single Family - approximately 21 units on 5.2 acres
with a density of 4 units per acre
Commercial Shopping - approximately 44.5 acres
Multi-Family - approximately 360 unite on 15 acres
with a ,+ens ty of 24 units per acre
E-1705
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Curtis Holly spoke in favor of the petition stating that the
development would be a joint venture. Mr. Myers of Myers
Development Corporation had developed several country clubs in
Taxas. Mr. Holly then showed a slide presentation of various
country clubs and golf courses which Mr. Myers had constructed.
Mr. Craig Curry, with Nelson Corporation representing Mr. Myers,
spoke in favor stating that this petition was a proposal to amend
PD-12. The total project would cover 770 acres bordered by the
iH-35 and Shady Shores interchange, State School Road and would tie
into Robinson Road. Major points of access would be via the
• proposed realignment of Poet Oak Drive, Lee Drive which was an
existing road, the county road on the west and Lake Sharon Drive.
Mr. Curry then presented a large map of the proposed development and
pointed to the location of the proposed golf course which can
through the entire development. A large area to the north of the
development would be reserved for commercial shopping. Other land
uses would Include condominiums and cluster housing, apartments and
5 acres of single family dwellings.
Council Member Stephens stated that the Council had received citizen
input regarding other developments on the need to keep as many trees
as possible.
Mr. Curry reaponded that the center line of the property would :•4
cleared for the golf course and the developer's staff was hand
selecting trees which would be left in place.
Council Member Stephens asked if the developer could transplant
those trees which had to be moved.
Mr. Curry replied that discussion were being held on replanting (if
the trees.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner, reported that 16 reply
forms had been mailed with 0 returned. Staf! had looked at the
entire Oakmont development during their evaluation. The dual
Juriedlction between the oitias of Denton and Corinth was a
problem. The Denton Development Guide called for modaraee intensity
development along Loop 2881 however, high intensity uses were
• already in place. Traffic would pose a problem due to the proximity
of the development to the Golden Trian Is Malls The traffic impact
would be addressed at the time of platting.
p ' m S'"`•a i 'City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Six
• Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that staff had
worked with Myers Development Corporation, the City of Corinth and
City of Denton engineers for several months and felt thata suitable
traffic plan had been attained.
Persaud further reported that the golf course would account for 201
of the development and the Denton Development Guide did speak to the
need to preserve natural green belt areas. Oakmont would provide a
variety of housing types and the size of the development would allow
for coordination of one total project as opposed to smaller parcel
dovelopmer..s. Seventy-three percent of the total project had
already been approved by the City of Corinth. Whether the petition
was approved or not by the Council, the development would have an
impact on Denton. The Planning and Zoning Commission had
recommended approval with 3 conditions.
Stephens motion, Chew second to approve with the conditions attached
by the P62, Motion carried unanimously.
4, ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services=
providing for the expenditure of funds therefore= and providing for
an effective date.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-12
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE SIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACF FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES
• OR SERVICES: PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlespergec
'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
8. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials,
equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of
state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive
bids: and providing for an effective date.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-13
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW
EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE
BIDS: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On toll call
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger
'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change In zoning from the agricultural (A) district to
the commercial C) district on two tracts totaling 18.8 acres
located on the west side of Loop 268 approximately 2500 feet south
O of East McKinney Street (PH 426) 3.162
F r
city of Denton City council Minutes
Meeting of January 150 1985
Page Seven
S The following ordinance was presented=
NO. 8S-14
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON*
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-10 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES Te) APPROXIMATELY 18,801 ACRES
OF LAND SITUATED IN THE MARY L. AUSTIN SURVEY, A35TRACT NO,
4, DEN'TON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
LOOP 288 APPROXIMATELY 2,500 FEET SOUTH OF EAST MCKINNEY
STREET (F.M. 426) TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A'
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION Ah') USE TO COhMERCIAL 'C'
CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SA0 PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger
'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) j
classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a
128 acre tract located adjacent and east of FM 428 (Sherman Drive)
and adjacent and north of Kings Row and the Cambridge Square
subdivision 2-1696
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-15
• AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON*
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 129.245 ACR;15 OF LAND
LOCATED ADJACENT AND EAST OF F.M. 428 (SHERMAN DRIVE) AND
ADJACENT AND NORTH OF KINGS ROW AND THE CAMBRIDGE SQUARE
SUBDIVISION, AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT
'A' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF; TO PROVIDE FOR
A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A'
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT 'PD' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,'
Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
appproving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the light industrial ILI) classification on a 1.9
acre tract located on the west side of Bonnie Brae Street,
approximately 1,000 feet south of Willowwood Street. Z-1699
The following ordinance was presentedt
NO. 85-16
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY Of DENTON? TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 1.963 ACRES
OF LAND SITUATED IN THE 0. 0, BREWSTER SURVEY, ABSTAACT No.
56, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
BONNIE BRAE STREET APPROXIMATELY 1;000 FRET SOUTH OF
WILLOWWOOD STREET TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLtyy of Denton City Council Minutes
Mee Eing of January 15, 1985
Page Eight
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A'
• DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 'LI'
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATIONI AND DECLARING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second t-) adopt the ordinance. On roll call
Vote, McAdams 'aye," 'Alford 'aye,' Rlddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,'
and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion carried 5 to 0 with Council Member
Stephens abstaining.
F. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to
the planned development (PO) district on a 243.3 acre tract located
on the north side of I-35E, approximately 10800 feet east of Loop
288 L-1703
The following ordinance was presented:
N0. 65-17
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
rEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 243.361 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF INTERSTATE 35E APPROXIMATELY
11800 FEET EAST OF LOOP 2881 AND IS MORE PARPICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT 'A' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART
HEREOFI TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USo
DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 'PD' DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
• vote, McAdams 'aye,` Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperyat
'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion carried
unanimously,
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to
the planned development (PD) district on a 57 acre tract located on
the east aide of Loop 288, approximately 2,200 feet north of
T-35E. 2-1704
The following ordinance was presented:
N0. 65-1B
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING 'rFE ZvNING MAP OF 'THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME 4AS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX rO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES 'TO 57,087 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON THE EAST .SIDE OF LOOP 288, APPROXIMATELY 2,200
FBET NORTH OF INTERSTATE 359, AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT 'A' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A FART
HEREOF; rO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DIVELOPMENr 'PD' DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE 09SIGNATIONI AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,'
RLddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion
carried unanimously,
H. the Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change of toning classification from multi-family (MF-11
to general retail (OR) on a tract of approximately O.S326 acres
situated north of and abutting Londoneerry Lane and west of and
abutting Jason Drive Z-1707
%
t
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1965
Page Nine
The following ordinance was presented;
• NO. 85-19
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CIrf OF DENrON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX 'TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF 'THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY 000I:4AACE NO.
69-11 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 0.5321 ACRES
OF LAND SITUATED NORTH OF AND ABUTTING LONDONDERRY LANE AND
WEST OF AND ABUTTING JASON DRIVE AND MORE FULLY DESCRIBED
AS LOT 1, BLOCK D, TEASLEY MALL SUBDIVISION► 'TO PROVIDE FOa
A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM
MULTI-FAMILY 'MF-1' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO
GENERAL RETAIL 'GR' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR
SAID PROPERTY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams ~'ayep' Stephens 'aye,' Alford "aye,' Riddlesperger
aye, Chew aye, and Mayor Stewart Gaye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change of zoning classification from multi-family (MP-1)
to general retail (Get) on a tract of 0.574 acres of land situated
north of and abutting Londonderry Lane and east of and abutting
Jason Drive 2-1708
The following ordinance was presenfsdr
NO. 85-20
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY O.S74 ACRES
OF LAND SITUATED NORTH OF AND ABUTTING LONDONDERRY LANE AND
EAST OF AND ABUTTING JASON DRIVE AND MORE FULLY DESCRIBED
AS LOT 481, BLOCK B, TEASLEY MALL SUBDIVISIONr TO PROVIDE
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION
FROM MULTI-FAMILY "MF-1' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION ANO USE TO
GENERAL RETAIL OCR' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR
SAID PROPERTY] AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger
'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart Gaye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
J. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving historic landmark (H) designation at 213 East Oak Street
H-33
The following ordinance was presented;
NO. SS-21
AN URDINANCE DESIONArING 213 EAST OAX STREET IN THE CITY OF
DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER
ORDINANCE NO, 80-30 (AATICLS 28A OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING ORDINANCE)I AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams 'aye," Stephens 'aye,' Alford "aye,'
Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
5. Resolutions
As The Council considered approval of a resolution
supporting Section 312 Rehabilitation Program of the Department of
Housing and Urban Development,
J
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Ten
• Elizabeth Evans, Community Development Coordinator, reported that
staff was requesting Council approval of the iesolutkon so that
application could be made for a loan program for Community
Development Block Grant funds for residents.
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the Fort Worth Regional Office of the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development has Section 312
Rehabilitation loan funds available for distribution to cities
certifying their desire to participate in the Section 312 Program
and committing themselves to paying the administrative costs
Incurred in operating the programs and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
believes it to be in the best interests of the citizens of Denton to
participate in such program;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I,
The City of Denton, Texas, hereby certifies its desire to
participate in the 'Section 312 Fkogram,' Section 312 of the Housing
Act of 19641 42 U.S.C. 1452b., as amended, and hereby commits itself
to pay the administrative costs incurred in the operation of the
program,
SECTION it,
The Office of Community Development is hereby authorized to
submit the appropriate application for Section 312 Rehabilitation
loan funds Including a copy of this Resolution therewith,
SECTION III.
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the l.th day of January, 1985,
RICHARD 0. SrEaART, MAYOR
CIrY OF DEAros, rexAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D, MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DeNTON, TEXAS
BY:
Chew motion, McAdams second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford 'aye,'
Riddlesperger 'aye,' Cnew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
F., The Council considered approval of a resolution to
. amend F-51 lease at the Denton Municipal Airport.
Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works$ reported
that under the Fox-51 contract which was approved in 19900 Mt, prank
' r r
. f
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Eleven
• Strickler had the option to lease property adjacent to his business
at the Denton Municipal Airport. Mr, Strickler was now requesting
to exercise this option. The property was approximately 300800
square feet which would bring his total lease tract up to 1.16 acres.
Council Member Stephens asked if the Airport Advisory Board had any
problems with this arrangement.
Angelo responded that there had been some discussion regarding the
property behind Mr. Strickler and this cutting that portion oft from
the runway. Staff had devised a plan which would give access to the
runway for the property behind the Immediate lease property. This
solution was acceptable to the Airport Advisory Board. A series of
taxiways would intersect the property behind Mr. Strickler to
provide access.
Council Member McAdams stated that the vi 'y should lolk very
carefully at all issues relative to the airport.
Mayor Stewart asked If Mr. Stricker had met the terms of his lease
agreement.
Angelo responded yes.
Council Member McAdams asked what was the length of the lease
agreement.
Angelo replied 25 years.
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the City of Denton leases land upon the Denton
Municipal Airport to Pox-51 Limited by lease agreement dated July 1,
19801 and
WHEREAS, the lease agreement provides that Fox-51 Limited
may least additional land at three and one-half cents per square
foot per year if such right is exerciusd prior to July 1, 19851
WHEREAS, Pox-51 Limited, acting by and through its
President, F. D. Strickler, has determined to exercise its right to
lease additional lands and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the CiP.y of Denton, Texas,
believes it to be in the interest of efficient airport operations
and in accordance with the existing lease agreement to lease
additional property to Fo:-51 Limiteds
NOW, THEREFORE, BE it RESOLVED 3Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CIrY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, rHATs
SECTION I.
The attached amendment to the airport lease agreement of
July 1, 1980, between the City of Denton and Pox-51 LJr.iLS3 a
hereby approved.
SECTICH it.
The Mayor is hereby authorised to execute the attached
amendment on behalf of the City and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to affix this Resolution, with the executed amendment
attac6ad, to the original airport lease agreement dated July 1,
1980, ii:scrtbtng on the iriginal agreement the fact it has b?an
amended and the effective &te of such amendment.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meer'ng of January 15, 1985
Page twelve
• SECTION III.
This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 15th day of January, 1985.
RICHARD 0. S'rEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATCESr:
CHARLOTre ALLEN, CIrf SECRETARY
CI"Y OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO L^e GAL FORM:
JOB D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYE
Stephens motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved with
the recommendations of the Airport Advisory Board. On roll call
voce, McAdams 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford •aya,' Riddlesperger
'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Notion carried
unanimously.
6. the council considered approval of preliminary and final
replat of the Avonlaln Addition, Section 11 1, Block G, Lots 17, 18
and 19.
• Hdrry Pereaud, Development Review Planner, reported ttat 48 reply
forms had been mailed with 4 returned in fAVbr and I returned in
opposition. The Planning and Zoning Commission had directed their
attention to matters external of the Subdivision and Land
Regulations. The residents in the area were concerned that the
developers had dug a tole in one of the lots and had built a gargage
on one of me lots causing a problem with the property boundary,
the developer had also caused soma damage to city streets in this
area by the use of heavy vacninery. Staff found no regulations
which coild be applied to this particular situation. If the
developer destroyed the lots it would result in a financial loss to
the developer. The staff therefore recommended approval.
Chew motion, McAdams second to approve the preliminary and final
replat of the Avondale Addition, Section III, block G, Lots 170 18
and 19. Motion carried unanimously.
1. The Council considered appointment of a Deputy City
Secretary.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that due to staff changes iron
time to time, a Deputy City Secretary must be redesignated. Staff
was recommended that Ms. Jennifer Imrie of the City Manager's office
be appointed as Deputy City Secro"ary to assist the City Secretary
with the upcoming election.
Stephens motion, Chew second to appoint Jennifer Imrie as Deputy
City Secretary. Motion carried unanimously.
8. mere was no official action on Executive session items of
legs► matter, real estate, personnel, or board appointments.
9. New Business
The following items of new business were suggested by
Council Members for future agendas:
~p ~'1'~ t~`~ZM •T " i a~ ` v:y a `v ~a f < a ~ :y_.r, ~ i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Thirteen
. I. Council Member Stephens requested a report on how to
improve the public address system in the Council Chambers.
2. Council Member Stephens requested a report on the city
street striping policy.
3. Council Farber Stephens requested a written report on the
status of surplus property. (D-33)
The Council then moved to the emergency agenda item.
1. The Council considered approval of a resolution
amending City of Denton policies and procedures.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this item had been placed
on the agenda at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Chew.
Mayor Pro Tem Chew stated that he felt it was befitting since
January 15 was the birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. that the
Council should designate the 3rd Monday in January to celebrate his
birthday as a legal holiday for the City of Denton.
Council Membe: McAdams stated that she felt Dr. King was one of the
most significant contributors to humanity in the United States and
felt that it was most appropriate that Denton as a city respond by
adding this holiday to the list of holidays.
Mayor Stewart asked if the city had specific days which employees
got off and were paid for.
Hartung yes.
Council Member Aiddlesperger asked what would be the cost to the
pity.
Hartung responded that he could nw, anXrer that specifically but
could maKe an eatimate. Holidays were unlike vacation in that there
was no direct cost with vacation days because they were spread out
during the year. When the city shut down operations for holidays,
there were many areas in which 21 hour a day coverage nad to be
maintained and could not he shut down. There were indirect costs
for over-time and holiday pay for employees wno had to wurk on these
days.
Council 'Aember kiddlesperger stated that he thought it was perfectly
fine to honor Martin Luther King as he was one of the most
significant people to American history. However he had noticed that
the city lid not celebrate Washington's birthday, Lincoln's birthday
or any other American national holiday as a city. He did not know
if it was appropriate. He felt that as a city we should have the
kind of celebrations that would be appropriate for Martin Luther
King but he had reservations about declaring a city holiday for one
American, no matter who he was, when there was not another
historical American in that kind of category.
Council Member McAdams stated that while it was noc a city holiday.
it was a federal holiday. She felt that there was added
significance in the fact that there were a number of holidays which
were celeorated, none of which reflected in anyway the contributions
made ay blacks in the United States. There was no holiday and no
> other attention given to reflect what had happened to blacks in the
United States, It might have chosen to recognize the 19th of June
in 'Texas, but was not. No step had ever been taken to recognize the
contributions that blacks have made and '.he changes that have been
made in their lives in the United States, While it might cost some
money, she felt it was high time some kind of action was taken in
recognition of the work and activities which nad been done by
blacks. This was symbolized by Martin Luther King's bifthday.
slacks would have been just as happy in some years past if there had
;,~y5 $ :n w - ,.w i. a. .:i as r tk. r•. . -.tx x. 'd_'.' :N, i, aaY} 'C
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Fourteen
• been something else but they have had nothing. Because of his
statute, it was reasonable to choose his birthday as the day.
Blacks could have National Black Americana Day but at the present
there was nothing and she felt it was very important that there be
something. Martin Luther King's birthday was a national holiday and
it seemed fitting, to chose this day as opposed to no recognition at
all as had been done in the past.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he thought all holidays
which the city presently celebrated had as much to do with blacks as
whites. Memorial Day was as much a day for blacks as for whites;
Independence Day - blacks contributed to that; Labor Day,
rnanksgiving, etc. He agreed and he was very reluctant to even
suggest otherwise because Martin Luther King's birthday nad been
designated as a national holiday. The only question he had was
whether it was appropriate for the city, that doesn't recognize any
other American, to simply say that they would close the citt offices
for his day and no one elses.
Council Member McAdams asked if Council Member Riddlesperger would
prefer June 19 to be designated as a holiday, She further stated
that she felt very strongly at this point about affirmative action
and taking some steps to say 'yes' to black Americans about where
the United States stands. As a teacher, Dr. Riddlesperger could
look at the holidays on the list of city holidays and he could say
that they had as much to do with blacks as with anyone else;
however, she dared him to say that when he read his history books
these holidays would accurately reflect the contributions of blacks
as it does of whites. She was asking that the Council take one
a~.all step just for some recognition and this seemed to be an
appropriate day. She was willing to change and make Juneteenth a
7cliday if that was preferrable. She felt Martin Luther King's
birthday was a better day as it was a national holiday. It was one
that school children, old people, people through the United States
and throughout the world could recognize and understand. It was
high time that something was done and everyone knows what this day
meant. She as a olack would simply like to nave a day designated to
honor the contributions of black Americans.
Mayor Stewart asked if there would Lien be a day for Chinese and
Mexican Americans. He felt that rare was being brought into the
issue in a backward fashion and he believed that it should be kept
out. Black people had participated in all the holidays and he was
proud of them. He fought with black men in the service and Memorial
Day honored them. There were blacks killed in the Revolutionary
War, in fact the first man killed during the war was Christmas Adams
who was black. All people were honored on Independence Day, He
agreed with Council Member Riddlesperger that the Council should not
take one man and take him out Eton everybody else and give a holiday
for that man himself, if you looked at the contributions that
George Washington and Abraham Lincoln made, as well as Roosevelt and
a nunbar of others, they would deserve a holiday on their birthday
also. He hesitated to single out one man and make his birthday a
holiday just because he was black.
Mayor Pro Tem Chew stated he felt Mayor Stewart was missing the
whole point. Not only did Martin Luther Sing represent the blacks
and the Chinese, but he woke up the conscience of America. From
where he was standing now, it sounded as though some of us still
needed to have their consciences awakened, when the issue was
examined realistically. what was actually being asked of the city
was to set aside a date for a man who did a lot for all Americans.
Council Member McAdams stated that she did not want a holiday just
for that one parson but rather for black Americans. It was all well
and good to talr, about the fact that Christmas Adams was one of the
people killed, but she suggested that if he had lived a little
longer he would not have been able to vote, he would not have been
able to walk into a restaurant, his children would not have gone to
R • , t ' .,.t ,;n x . , r 21. ^t 5 :i r ° r ,r,~ ro r i 9
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of January 15, 1985
Page Fifteen
. decent schools, he would have been discriminated against in terms of
jobs, and he would have had to do as she did as a child. She rode
on the back of the bus and the fumes made her ill. On a bus from
Dallas to Wichita Falls, the driver had to stop a Continential
Trailways bus because she was sick because she could not tolerate
the fumes at the back of the bus but she rode there because she was
black. What she was saying was that they could say all they wanted
to about Christmas Adams and what he was, but the blacks knew that
neither he nor the people who came after him were treated as equal
Citizens. It was high time to say something in favor. She did not
care if the Council decided to choose Juneteenth or some other day
but the fact remained that in the United States blacks had been
discriminated against for years and years in a way that was
unciviliz•!d. This would still be going on today were it not for
people like Martin Luther King and she felt some acknowledgement of
the change must be made; something that would say to young black
Americans growing up today that this was an acknowledgement of the
work which was done by blacks. A statement that the city's holidays
did not just reflect white American, they also reflect black
Americans. Sha would like to have this in the City of Denton as
well as in the United States. She did not believe that asking for
one day was asking for too much, given what the blacks had gone
through. If the city could afford all o: the dollars which were
spent on everything else, could they no': just afford one day on
behalf of the blacks who had suffered so much and as an inspiration
to those children who are coming now and who are still suffering
through a loss of symbols and role models. If the city could hold
Martin Luther King up as a person, as a role model for young black
people today, and help break the circle, it would be worth how ever
many dollars it costa thq city.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he could agree with whit
Council Member McAdams was saying. He did not know who to approach
it; perhaps a day could be designated as Black American Day. He
simply was sating to choose one American and celebrate his birthday,
no matter ho,r great he was, but not to celebrate George Washington
or Abraham Lincoln's birthday seemed inappropriate. Certainly it
was a natiot..ii holiday and should be celebrated as such. The only
question was wlcth:r the City of Denton offices should be closed.
Perhaps a better choice would be June 19th or a Blacl American Day.
He would vote for a day for those things, but not someone's birthday.
Council Member McAdams stated that she wanted this holiday.
Historically, this was so obviously observed.
Alford motion, Riddlesperger second to table the item until a full
Council could be present.
Council Member McAdams stated that there was only 1 Council Member
absent and felt the issue should be resolved.
Motion to table passed 4 to 2 with Council Member McAdams and Mayor
Pro Tem Chew casting the 'nay' vot?s.
Tne Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss legal
matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
dith no father business, the meeting was adjourned.
RICHARD 0. S^aEwARr, MAYOR
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
0676]
ssr
''V -`y"~1., ° .x fr•st r ,:~t :ice
P
City Council Minutes
January 24, 1985
The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at 4:00 p,is, in
the Personnel Conference Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Council Members Alford, McAdams,
Riddlesperger and Stephens
ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tea Chew
Council Member Hopkins
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
Personnel.
The Council conducted an interview fot the City Attorney position
with Ms. Susan Godwin.
No official action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
RICHARD 0.
16SIC
City Council Minutes
January 26, 1985
The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at 9:00 a.m, in
the Personnel Conference Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Council Members Alford, Hopkins,
McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
ASSENT: Mayor Pro Tea Chew
t. The Council convened intl. the Executive Session to discuss
Personnel.
The Council conducted interviews for the City Attorney position as
follows:
9:00 a.m. Mick HcKamie
10:30 a.m. Vonceil Jones Hill
12:30 P.M. Karen Brophy
2:00 P.M. James Riggs
Council Member Alford left the meeting.
3:30 P.M. Dc;le Curtis
No official action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
1
16S9C
1 ~ h
City Council Minutes
January 29, 1985
The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at 1:00 p.m. in
the Personnel Conferencc Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Council Members Alford, Hopkins,
McAdams, and Riddlesperger
ABSENT: Mavor Pro Tem Chew
Council Member Stephens
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
Personnel.
The Council conductea interviews for the City Attorney position as
follows:
1:00 p.m. Debra Urayovitch
2:50 P.M. Jack Barton
Council Member Stephens joined the meeting during Mr. Barton's
interview.
4:00 p.m. Joe Morris
5:00 P.M. William Walker
No official action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
RICH.kRD 0. ,
1660C
j .1h is yl `tl ! h.
p l
DATE: x/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REF0KT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLATS AND REPLATS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee and the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval of the following platF and replats:
1. Prelim ~ary and final replat of the Claude Hill Addition
2. Preliminary and final replat of John A. Hann 's Addition,
Lot IA, Block 1 (formerly King Addition)
3, Preliminary and final replat of the W.W. Wright Addition,
Lot 3-R, Block 2
4. Approval of final replat of Allan Estates Mobile Home "ark
SUMMARY:
BACKGROUND:
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IIIPACT:
Not applicable
Respect-fuAallkA
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
1
i
1/~ lilt t- e
arry ersau
Development Revi,iw Planner
Appro ed:
JeI e r
Director 1 n ing
and Community Development
0663]
iY si 8; 17
n t: tCITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SU14XARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: February 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary and final replat of
the Claude Hill Addition
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.836 acres situated south of
and abutting Stroud Street and vest of and
abutting Elm Street and being a replat of part
of Lots 2 and 3, Block 26 and shown in the
William Loving Survey, Abstract 759, City of
Denton. The site is zoned commercial (C) and
the purpose of the replat is to create three
separate building sites.
Water, electric, gas, telephone and commercial
solid waste services and facilities are adequate
and available. Sanitary sewer capacity is,
however, limited at this location and the
developer will be required to sign an agreement
with the Director of Public Utilities for dry
type uses on this site.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replat of
Claude Hill Addition
RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee, and the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
approval of the preliminary and final replat of
the Claude Hill Addition.
ALTERNATIN'ES: Approval or denial of the preliminary and final
replat
.ATTACHMENTS: Reduced preliminary and final r,iplat
Harry V. Persaud
Development Review Planner
0663]
W
• !u
n
ST MN IAAC Ik
s
'It
LOT ! i LOT 2 LOT
• 't i a
_3 1
s :ear.., 1 ,avr 1 ~ i.• ' ~ W
+ 1
v L L
M E 2 C. I I A L. , ON
C O ~ ,41
e
e ' eC ' rl + ip
£ ISTROUO STREET ,yr Rl'~
. 1. t~
LOW i r EAST 186.3+ .
{ - fan I~ad
1 ri 91. +N •NM♦
a ~ I
W ,
l 0.210 At 0150 Ac. 0.416 Ac Q at .
;LOT 3 LOT 2 A LOT I M
Wo
f L 0 C K
iIr 1 Ear$1
(fCw[ CwIMrE 1 0_ ' ~ W
~ rr
a ~
r r _
~JA' 4J1 'Soo
5.89' S7 W. 1178 S;T WEST 1900
7.i<111 SL 19wto VI IN I'J•
l o f 1 rl l '7 r1 S:
1
J. I
PLAY Oc
CLAUDEMLL ADDITION ! I'
BLOCK I 2, let!
r1 o eye ACRE
1 PEING A REPLAY Of f'4R7 Of ]r~; N roar
LOTS 2 B S. SLK. 26, 01113INAL
10'MN Of DE.NTON ; IN T4E
w'LLIAM LOVING SURvE+ A - t59
City A COuNtr of OENSON, It>r A5
-•.".r' _ Fri T_'. - ------"-7..
gyp: rll" It:
rl AvLf slit l
AlF : i
r
y t it r.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: February 19. 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of Allan Estates
Mobile Home Park
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 39.3134 acres situated east
of and abutting Mayhill Road and west of Edwards
Road and more fully described as Allan Estates
Mobile Home Park, en addition to the City of
Denton and shown on the Gideon Walker Survey,
Abstract #1330. The final layout has been
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
but the developer desires to make some changes
with respect to the internal easements and the
street layout. The amendment conforms with the
provisions contained in the Denton Mobile Home
Ordinance.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the final replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered
this matter on its emergency agenda of February
13 and voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the
final replat.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of final replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced final replat
Barry ersau ~t
Development Review Planner
} ~ ~J
f ^
M
"All
I 1 a
1 I
~ 1 I 'r.• r. w
I ~ 7
I _--.--'-(TDVMADI ~GD~ OMN[R{ CtNSV1COT1ON
1 . • M rw• Hwu^I I\ ~0 N..in14 .nalvH IV Ni.r 1•. r«'a r of Ir
O I JrN~,. I •uwlr 4 14 11•r r r«n...,r I.ra. 1r.w ..f M•1 r.N
_..~'nn'~~~-~~•~•-~~~~_.......___. IIMN rPn .Ha..r••n.l LY. r~1 ••1y NIMHIM
I ~ ` IrwAl lwl~lw 1. ili•1' Mt~N•r1•^.~ie'`enY N 1w•in~i'V
1 rlr •w• Hrl l•.IN 11 1••r'IrN N rr.+~ t..n.• H
y_ \ I InlNln orN y1111.• r1. NI. 4'•.r Iva. Ham. 14 Hw «11V
ooo,
1 . 1.` ~_~X]I ✓ ~ .~.~IM I MI MIMVr M N'll •1 ww~. HNr1Y «w•w,M •r 4'~ W
I J.'- • T
t I • r• ,-4f..•._..........~.._.~.•T_..~..~..`-_II A1J.Mlr.-_...__. _ N i •.I.r ir.~l wn .."1. 0 I•.Nr V. MI..
Y 1 •10.1}.. 001 11111. 000111 1Ct111 111 11 01.11. fY1r11/1 1111,1101 _ 1 I .M• N Mr I..1.. N .N IN•, Ir. N r..1. No • NI« IM
! _ `R , i e[ r l •Mi •I . i fl .u N «r tl <•N N r 1.».. Ir
• I r T \ ^ / 1 M.1 r+ni 1' Ir Y . M Y..r•1 rM.Y IN1 N r. 4r Ilw
1 ' ; , 1 niC IINw ~n« i...q b rN eyr Ilw .r N. J.W«•
I
IAl l 1 I.If ail
I I F _ 1 ]i:.. _ 'allll Vl.6141: - t 1 .nw 1..I Nr u1r 11~
„ f _ nra. r.1. r~ fw n Y 1» rw ..r .Ir•. 01. r 1010
1Qx re 'J1tK
W
j
y••.w'IINNIr. • ` 1 r..m, 14r .0,.- M '•411w It N•Vr :.or I r.O0 N r. V.V
r r It.lq r
-
` 1 f n1.•n.••r••N. 1.rn 1N. 1«Y •.r "•.NW MVMI. f.
i. : YPVI. • MIr1 r
I ' ~ ~ ~ I „'N I~ NNYI I IYii« i.+I N ww, r 1.1 • ~ NO
I r o I«•. r11q . o r ..i •Ywr Mlr. 4rw r.r
rrty N M=r••n M
IN Ni Y. « M1• IM1 w ""0
ri«'+. .w••. ~0 u1. .r '
1 2 YIN P•• HH 11..r .,gill 1.1. to 1.P r11 Yr.1' .p YOl1 1.' x.1.1 ` SI Iw.
.
loo
" yQt~Y .n » N
= to N ti.ri'ti `$LOT I to
I 1• I t t N.11 IIILIH _ -/i , .
IUC: s% Y-(/ , INC Ih^AA'1:_74 1 C' M•r1 .r .^•r u• • r.w rrrw r w A r11
. Y. _ NOR IV•q J%~n M rI N•.wNI. yr.r r. M• IIrVY.
[ I . . 1, • r.n I.r ✓.r 1 ~ ~ I w;...... w w...~.+t.1 I. N IY r ~»r n1 «r1. •wI 7'r~..
BLOCK I 1n..r• «I r w. w w wr wr r wrs r•1
~ 1 f!1'~r. { S. ~~tirt S 1~•~'. I ~ I rr 1.r .Ire
1 V .._J r1." N 4 _M1.1.l__ 11t`s 1:111w 1a-= t=Oti q=
' I rY .1[r. 1.u. r m.... 1 1
1 ~•r 1 - 2N~.~ 1I .,.roof 1111Yt Yt h11 1.1•L ♦aa re .ery t+► lvllvt1O11[ CttlflflCAT10N
r •]7 - - ww I k r wi.l
11 1 I.r I (Nrl r row
1'~ \ t 1
. n'rr ti ~1 r I ~ul..l ot to". SO
• I 1'Irrrrnw r i
} I
I AT'l. to to 1A'JrMt'.1W-: _ _ t• _ _!J de"GI f _ I N ..N ww .u. o...r.~ r•«rw n 1.r
4. ` • • . ^ ' ~t' t L Y.T.T.'~` r^S.? 1.itF L•.'i1~ 1lPI
I . ~ , a ¢
•d~S1I z_._-._._. ~
I ; MOM lot UlL 001- 018 fC[I[1 N111 f/U1..0..00 1131/01311 1« _ _ _ _ f1A yYy Y 1.u KrMr•I1• N tM . tiln r rf Y rN
I i•\1 1 _ - _ Y •.;'n•. w Ir. `VM•r'•.Yfr M 1 4r•w N
---mr- q
N~O YMr Y
W. W. 1. fy'4r.Yf N.ITMK j_f ~CI.111 ! rr1W~ Ir„rl•N .w•~F. ,~.rY ~r l
0 I 1 1. . . I •.d1~_.~
N 9.4.0 Ir .11111. •
w..r
r.
QQ Ijj{{ 1'-.N N.•W 1 YIN. M iw
1 _ 11111 Xrr ...1.11.- ` ' M11.11 ,Y J<dlll 1.Ar~.. ;tn•. wN ._w.r
-,^'to"
ttil[Ftri ll 1;112
I ~r~•'• - ]►+r••, •.11R ;r11r 1•rr " &J04 7att+
1 `Y1• - _ 0...ry1r 1l1r. Nipple IN
Lot
- •11R _ __-rr~• irr~ r.
I ! r 1 ~ .y Iq1 r.,► r
7
40 31 I w NOW to 14 ~~~IIII ~.r~•.1W. ".9 ALLAN EStAtES MOB" 900K PARK
I
I 11 WY11 .rlg1 INr►11 1 yY. ♦ ^.Y i p fA11 U1e 131
1NC tltl It allot O 10"Mello, 11111
1i _ &Igoetr II MP tM w= tr4=1 toll 11310
I . _....11
. ......s 1. .,.....~lr •!t{J11r1'a t r. f _ Ju wJ • . s.~ Y I Y✓..1 wf MIK[
rlltlr1.h11 el.L /1111tI 16tfU t1111ft1/1 fuafelt 11x111 _ l O1fF1ER 41 I 1 .,1 r YfM If 1`n^...~+rl
Z 1 1 1\ I e to.18.1114. /0311 .q•/•
( ~ I Ill tt /MI•M~
i3SwAf'f11G]1l................_.... .:1, J
N SUIWE101N
1 ! 1 rt/'St"1['r7~S+"""' 1 e I •Itl!?1 rYtfttft+. t~l+•i/^rYrr
1 I tfl! rf-@~ as
1 I N1111 11.11 '7tM
I 1 "IV
.I' iC, w 9th a, ^..Ty R.
Aj~
t C9,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: February 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary and final
replat of the John A. Hann's Addition,
Lot 1A, Block 1 (formerly King Addition)
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.11 acres situated
north of and abutting Hann Avenue west of
Oakland Street and more fully described as
Lot IA, Block 1, and shown in the BBB &
CRR Survey, Abstract 185, City of Denton.
The site is zoned multi-family (MF-1) and
residential four-plex typs development is
anticipated.
Water, sanitary sower, electric, gas,
telephone and solid waste services and
facilities are adequate and available.
This is an existing tract of land within
an older developed area and the lot
dimensions fall short of the minimum depth
requirements by 6.88' and the minimum
width requirements by 10.1'. Lot depth
and lot width variance is recommended in
view of the circumstances.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final
replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee and the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
approval of the preliminary and final
replat of the John A. Hann's Addition,
Lot 1A, Block 1.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary and
final replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plats
arry ersau
Development Review Planner
0663]
wa•t' •aY
Q
40
wtrwnr attr
LOT 1 PFALlMtM W SLAT
/LOCK 1 yj qtO ADMTft rrrnr•rnrrn.,rr
owwm
JW P. * .MMES E IaN0
M? WW STATE UW KM
Boom ~
mans W-1 wao~
K"WE EMNEIAMNO
M/ma LfaAJ
-taw-.. A"I 41 ol
+ atom isRn Kr
HA N N AVENUE A
_ .r«
..•rw. f++ yrN-
- - .~myt. - ✓
s v :'r t.
F
e
Twi tw.
p t0 !a •0 60 Ar
n 4 _
a T SITE
► till
GRAPHIC SCALE = E1
fC• S
to 1111 w. N 1l. TwE
1
Sw
r - ~
CONJN SS =
~ G
IF/,1 t i
VICINITY MAP
No Sta 1S
I
to t 20
♦
M. l S. k0El1S Il •1, V St. EIS 0. It
/ S
RP EAST {9.90' ~P
- - _ _ t 6
rc c
I ~
p 0,107 ApCr!
° uspolsvU1
i01~ P~~t~N r
• N N
• O
P ,n In
- I1r .
to,
O
• O
O w
H
10 J ;
J h o O , r•.
o
O LOT 1•A BLOCK 1 H ~
` Z tOhN A. HANNr! AWN.
A0.8•
too a • Cana tt'
WEST 49,901
H A N K A V E N U E
S0' R. 0,w-
I
f
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: February 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary and final replat of
W.W. Wright Addition, Lot 3-R, Block 2
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.172 acres situated north of
and abutting Sena Street and east of Gober
Street and more fully described as Lot 3-R,
Block 2, W.W. Wright Addition. The site is
zoned residential single family (SF-7) and the
purpose of the replat is to establish a single
family (SF-7) lot.
The minimum lot width for residential develop-
ment is 60 feet. The replat will create a lot
of 50 feet width. in this case since this is
the only portion of land remaining in Block 2
there is no way that the proposed lot can be
widened to meet the minimum lot width require-
ment. The depth of the lot, however, exceeds
the minimum requirement by 50 feet and the area
exceeds the minimum requirement by 500 square
feet. A lot width variance is recommended in
view of the circumstances.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Comu.ittee, and the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
approval of the preliminary and final replat of
W.W. Wright Addition.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary and final
replat
ATTACHMENTS: Reduced final replat
A) -
Harry Persaud
Develo went Review Planner
0663]
WMI
•
SCALE' 1"s 2000'
1
`4 Of
•f
C
-60
W W
V1 tNO W
W
K
Toe ON VAG
SEND} STREET
r 500 R0r
E
DCVCLO►CR FmAL PLAT
MARION 91A,TN W. W, WRL~gT AWN,
DCNTON,ATX NIGO LOT 34, K Two
1GN0 A AIPLAT OF LOTS, CLR. C,
M./. wall"T ADDN.. 71/" Om OCT.
CRT ♦ COUNTY OF OCNMN. TCAAS
SIAMlT11 EN•TM
mom-
' f
r ♦ r - e y`j' ~ ~ ti qyi, l~j ~.!dyyR Ai q+pp~ {x`Q iY 1~~'
r~•`r `f r4 ~z4 A a ~e~lyVY~~y ~~i,5 1 _
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR $ MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT
Serve asor on
Pu ping r FacV with ility to Hogan and
High Consider
of
Service Change
the Northwest Denton area.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February 6,
1985, recommended approval of Change Order No. 1 with Hogan and
Rasor, Inc., in the amount of $ 1 250 for engineering design (see
Exhibit 1).
SUMMARY
This change order will provide for design for a direct pipe
connectlun between the existing McKenna Park tank overflow pipe
and the street storm drain system.
BACKGROUND
Due to the hydraulics of the City of Denton water distribution
system, the McKenna Park tank periodically overflows with pumps
running in order to maintain pressure on the city system. This
overflow problem will be corrected with this contract
construction of high service pumps and a high altitude cut off
valve. There will be times needed, however, to purge the tank
with a controlled overflow. In the past and at present, an
overflow of water from the tanks erodes the hillside of the
adjacent park which creates an unsightly and unsafe condition.
This change order will provide for piping this overflow to the
City's drainage system. Surveying cost will be covered in
orig:ina). contract. Pipe on hand in city yard will be used if
negotiable with contractor.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
High Service Pump CIP Project, Hogan and Rasor Engineers, Denton
Municipal Utilities, Parks and Recreation Department.
3467U:5
T .o pi `4:r 4".MJ° . r q
r 1 rv~ r r t k .c .d i 'r' 1 L so
FISCAL IMPACT
Origi al Eng ineering Services Contract X17,000
Change Order No. 1 for design of overflow 1 250
drain line
Revised Engineering Contract $189250
Source of Funds: 623-008-0461-9138
(water bond funds)
Prepared by: Respectfully submitted,
C. David Ham .4 A90 944
Asst. Director of Utilities
Water/Wastewater Utilities Chris Hartung
City Manager
Appr vg :
e son
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT i Hogan & Rasor Change Order Letter Proposal
II Minutes PUB Meeting of 2/6/85
3467U:6
a
HOGAN & RABOR11 Inc.
Engineers = Planners • Consultants
January 18, 1985
Mr. C. David Ham, P.E.
Superintendent Water 3 Sewer
Field Services Division
215 E. McKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: Overflow Pipe
McKenna Park
Ground Storage Tank
Denton, Texas
H& RNo.0805
Dear Mr. Ham:
As per your request, we have completed our review of the total projected cost
• required to design and construct a direct connection between the existing
overflow pipe, as referenced above, and the City of Denton's storm drainage
system.
In accoirdance with said request, we do hereby offer the following:
500'} x 12" RCP : $ 90000.00
Const. Contingencies @ 25% % 2,250.00
Total Construction Cost TI; SUM
Surveying 11000.00
Engineering N 19250.00
Total Projected Project Cost . f 13,500.00
As a general rule in utility line work, the cost of material for the proposed
Improvements will be in the range of 65% of the total construction cost. In
this instance, that figure would be approximately $5,850.00.
However, there is no guarantee that the constructor will install pipe that he
does not furnish, for 35% of the construction cost, or that he would be
willing to provIN a performance bend.
The above items are in response to the possibility of the City furnishing
10-inch Ductile Iron Pipe currently stock piled in their yard.
•
suite 800 One Gellerla Tower
13355NoelRoad e94p382.46O0 Clallao,Texas '7a24O
7-7
r U1, if you feel the City may wish to add this to the High Service Pump Station
• design project, please let us know,
Please advise us if we can assist you further in this matter.
Very truly yours,
HQGAN 6 RASQR INC
Dennis R. Masters
Associate
-2-
~ F F r(
Public Utility Board'Minutes
Febr+)ary 6, 1984
Page 7
The Board looked at each of the proposed agenda items
q asking questions about item $2 regarding utility
maintenance projects from growth related projects. Staff
suggested it probably relates to the format of the capital
improvements plan. The Board was concerned about item #3
in the agenda, zoning and the effect of zoning relates to
utilities development and policies.
The Board took no other action on this item, no action was
necessary.
15. CONSIDER THE CHANGE ORDER fl HOGAN RAZOR ON THE DESIGN
P ASE OF THE HIGH SERVICE PUMPING FACILITIES TO SERVE THE
HIGHER E LE AG T ION OF T NOR. HWE ST DE 0 ARE
Mr. Ham informed the Board that the change order was due to
the periodic overflow of the McKenna Park tank, which
causes erosion on the hill side of the adjacent park and
creates both a unsitely appQrrance and somewhat unsafe
conditions. The change ordL.: is necessary due to the
overflow problem, which did not create a particular problem
to utilities but for Parks and Recreation who has requested
that a means of channeling the water out of the park
instead of creating the erosion be added to the project.
The Board requested additional information provided by Mr.
Ham again stating it wac the run-off pipe that was not
included in the original spk,cifications because it had not
been a problem to utilities and Parks and Recreation had
just recently inform utilties of the problem for them.
Ms. :3oyd made a motion to approve the change order and to
recommend it to City Council for approval. Mr. Thompson
seconded the motion, all "ayes" no "nays", motion carried.
16. REVIEW OF THE DRAFT DOCUMENT ON PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
FLARRI~NG 'POLICY STATEMENT -
The Board discussed to policy statement as presented in the
work agenda item. The Board thanked Mr. Nelson for putting
the document together and presenting it back to the Board.
The Board recommended that the first sentence under Energy
add co-general,ion and solid waste beforeletc.
Ms. Boyd made a motion to adopt the drift policy statement
as the department of Utilities Policy Statement. Mr.
Thompson seconded the motion, all "ayes" no "nays", motion
carried.
0. d 1 l~, rtl"`.ik ,4 A r n -I uE o f
DATRi 02119/85
c;,' ' COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ,
FROM. G. Chris Hartung* City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND
CONSISTIN9 OF APPROXIMATELY 31 ~J27 ACRES OF LAND BEGINNING AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RYAN t;OAD AND TEASLEY LANE (A-$)
RECOMMEND ON:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.
This is 3 voluntary annexation request. The Planning and Toning
Coom,ission has considered both annexation and toning.
BACKGROUND:
This is a voluntary annexation request for toning and development
purposes.
RAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS_ F T D:
See service plan
FISCAL IMPACT,
Undetermined
ROBPGCtjk¢1
cm t7/i
G. Chris 11artung
City Manager
Prepared by:
David Ellison
Senior Plann6r
App ve S
Jeff Mey
Director of Planning
and Community Development
05561
X, }}r~ •lV' %y X ~W'c ♦ ABM . ^t 1 ! "'~n a~ r-n~y~r v. x,~! ♦ 4r
~r zQFf t .f ¢ n'. E F Y "'.1tA c yn', pr ",4 t 1 ? it rr $
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: February 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Adoption of ordinance and service plan annexing
a tract of land consisting of approximately
31.027 acres of land beginning at the southwest
corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (FM 2181)-
(A-8)
SUMMARY: This is the tract currently owned by Mr. B, L.
Archer which has been submitted for a change in
zoning allowing seventeen acres of single family
land use, ten acres of multi-family cluster
housing, and four acres of general retail and
neighborhood service land use. City Council
action on the zoning will follow final
annexation action later on the agenda.
ACTION REQUIRED: Adopt ordinance and service plan
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve ordinance and service plan
2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance
2. Service Plan
3. Map
01U, A AA
David Ellison
senior Planner
0556) '
y a I, {ad tq.'5 .c r y},N y S J 1 c. W 'i 'S • q,•
rv4Y~n 7:r :.e"'F~dvl„{ tY a 'K ~ .3? C i i~i 4 ~ ,a7 v 1 by a o. rn~ .
0903L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 34.173 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
PART OF THE ELI PICKETT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 10181 DENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY;
ASD DECLARING All EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
or the petition of B. L. Archer; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the loth day of December, 1984 in the Council
Chambers for all interested persons to state their views and
present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the 18th day of December, 1984 in the Council
Chambers for all interested persons %.o state their views and
present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has liven published in full at least
one tine in the official newspep<r of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and aiLer the public hearings;
pOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shrill be bound by
the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which t3ay
hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein bhall be
subject to and shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by
the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as
follows, to-wit:
All that certain 34.173 acre tract or parcel of land situated in
the Eli Pickett Survey, Abstract Number 1018, Denton County,
Texas; said tract being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING for the southeast corner of this tract at a point in the
east right-of-way of Farm-to-Market Road Number 2181, (Teasley
Lane), said right-of-way is the City of Denton, City limit line as
shown on Annexation Ordinance 65.43, Tract III, said point is
north 89°53' east 90.00 feet from northeast corner of a called
58.103 acre tract, recorded in Volume 769, Page 553, Deed Records,
Denton County, Texas;
THENCE south 89°53' west crossing said F.N. 2181, part way with
north line of said 58.103 acre tract, a distance of 1389.88 feet
to a point for the southwest corner of this trace;
A-8/8. L. ARCHER/PAGE ONE
PA. • b six r r. r ~4r~ d 0 is
'''b iy nY f-' 3 M~ 1 b " r< , V I'.• 4„ w`
THENCE north 00°07'44" west a distance of 1132.64 feet to th
north right-of-way of Ryan Road, also the City of Denton, City
limit line as shown on Annexation Ordinance No. 75.31, for the
northwest corner of this tract;
THENCE north 89°57' east with said north right-of-way and City
limit line -t of 1102.74 feet to said east right-of-way of
Teasley Lane, for northeast corner of this tract;
THENCE south 33°49'45" east with said City limit line a distance
of 58.64 feet to the biginning of a curve to the right having a
radius of 1477.30 feet (^hord bearing south 17°37'45" east);
THENCE southeasterly with said City limit line, and said curve an
arc distance of 835.39 feet to end of curve;
THENCE south 01°25'45" eas. with said city limits and east
right-of-way a distance of 296,56 feet to Point of Beginning.
SECTION 11.
The above described ro arty is hereby classified as A ricul-
tural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning uap
of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended
accordingly.
SECTION 111.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the Y~'_day of
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1985.
RILKkPD 0. SIMIART, MA
CITY OF DENTION, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTL ALLEN CITY SECRETM
CITY OF DENTON,pTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
I
A-W . L. ARCHER/PACE TWO
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of se-vice:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C, Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4,09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
E, Refuse Collection
(1) The some regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month niter the effective
date of annexation,
17 ~V '7 `44 'C 57
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in thy, annexed area on
the effective date of annexatio".
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and glitters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J, Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation, The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K, Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power,
P k "t 4 F s: Y"t :..z ' tI°4
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
'2) Impact on the Ualanced growth policy of the city.
W Impact on overall city economics.
The annrxed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date if annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
establishes criteria as all other areas of the city.
II r.N4 •.r r
nr.nn rnr am 1 ~.r : u 1. .1 !L t,• '
"'"'"`fff Y T '7 r.
.411,11,_
- f/nr
a I ~ I { I \_c-\\
I M 1 1
2
i1~~ fl~ 1 . _ 1 I I vlCl,il V MIV
f } f to I I \ \ LG1pC1
----"la rp 10 / _ \
' ! 1
1
v
VD,
1 "1 7 ~S, F' „Orf !t F t A`1 c\CIUSTfR i 1
IT '7- i 1004 ® 11 W/Aa I p1
_ w I
~ S. { \ I t 1 0 b]I
Q 1 , ve. vl•-r a•
44 lo,
./la Mr• 1d•f
Nlayl Fl•i/• ~ /
Iw.r lwt 4NRtllix,
14
to a I ■l.'rN 7! , f 1c_ I7 to
X1 11 'T N / f 201 as ' u f le I at n71i 2 Ie I! ± +
A~ft L,.'j ItY
• 't~+••la - - - - ~ ~ i ROd+NSON AD
MIA11 10
I YI
awfa lo• UrLL
miww~
L 1
Rig MHJ,1 .,f 11
a,
Cn,r~tih 'a.r:ar nlL+ I I IICIHgSLISS .
CALLED Al 011 AL TMF W.- t rp-- imp
CO PICKET? SURVEY A"1018 1525 Clow SFRIWI%
T ~lpu I.~--~--
DENTON COVVY, TEXAS CLILal, L tstl~ r
ELI PICKETT NAtvTWA4W
071 Ira
e
lot, 1014 mom 10406 bed
k, r wi t1 rsr-
l '
P & Z Minutes
November 14, 1964
Page a
D. (Make a recommendation to the City Council regarding
the proposed voluntary annexation of 31.027 acres
located at the southwest corner of Ryan Road and
Teasley Lane (FM 2181) (A-8).
Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
petition for 31.027 acres located at the southwest
corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (FM 2181). He
stated the owner of the tract, Mr. B.L. Arcner, has
submitted a change of toning re uest which if approved
will permit 17 acres of single family land use, 10 acres
of multi-family cluster houetngg, and four acres of
general retail and neighborhoo13 service land use. He
further stated the Planning and Community Development
Department recommends approval of this annexation
request.
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of the
proposed voluntary annexation of 31.027 acres located at
the southwest corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane.
LSeconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (5-0).
E. Make a recommendation to the City Council concorning
the proposed annexation of approximately 5 acres of
land located north of Highway 380 west and adjacent
and west of Masch Branch Road (A-9).
Mr. Ellison stated staff has received a preliminary plat
of a proposed five acre office development which is a
portion of a 69 acre parcel owned by Tri-Steel Struc-
tures, Inc. The preliminary plat of the Tri-Steel
Headquarters Addition (five acre office site) has been
reviewed and accepted by the Development Review Commit-
tee and approved by resolution of the City Council.
He stated due to the location of this property in
relation to the Denton Municipal Airport, the
Development Review Committee requested submission of
a general development plan for the entire parcel. He
stated it has been the practice of the City Council
and the Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend
annexation of parcels in the region of the municipal
airport that are experiencing development activity.
An airport master plan effort is curtsntly underway and
staff is continuing its policy of encouraging develop-
ments in proximity to the airport that have little
future liability potential insofar as height, noise, or
other potentially negative considerations are concerned.
He stated Tri-Steal Structures hat cooperated with annex-
ation efforts to date and has expressed a desire to nave
its preliminary and final plat approved prior to final
action in February, 1985. He stated the intent is to
begin development on the five acre office site immedi-
ately. He stated although not zoned, Tri-Steel Struc-
tures has agreed to a maximum of two stories for the
proposed office use; staff recommends continuation on
the five acres proposed to be developed.
Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend the proposed
annexation of approximately S acres of land located
north of Highway 380 west and adjacent and west of Match
Branch Road, Seconded by Mr. LaForte and unanimously
carried (5.0).
T
t
A-8
MUSED ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
November 12, 1964 Submit agenda items
November 13, 1984 Submit agenda oacK-up
*November e0, 1964 City Council sets date, time ana
place for pudic hearing
November 21, +984 Notice to Denton Record Cnroni:le
Novemrsr 23, 1984 Publish notice r »yR `
November 26, 1984 Submit agenda item
r November 27, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
*December 041 1984 City Council holds public nearing
December 05, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
December 07, 1984 Publisn notice y
December 10, 1964 Submit agenda item
December 118 1984 Submit agenda bacK-up
*Lecember The 1964 City Council noias public nearing
December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item
January 02, 1985 Submit agenda bacK-up
*January 081 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
January 10, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance
February 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 12, 1985 Submit agenda oacK-up
*February 19, 1985 einal action by City Council
08329
DATBt 02/19/85
GUY COUNCIL REPORT FOR MIT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM., 0. Chris Hartung, city manager
I
SUBJECTS ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND S9kjIC6 PLAN ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND
CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 5.70 ACRES BEGINNING NORTH OF HWY 380
WEST AND ADJACENT AND NEST OF MASCH BRANCH ROAD (A-9)
RACOMM6NDATIONS
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.
SUMMARY:
This to the site of the Tri-Steel Headquarters Addition.
BACKGROUND:
Annexation was Initiated by Ptaff in keeping with policies urging
control Of development In the area of the Airport.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS FFECiFD.,
See service plan
FISCAL IMPACTS
Undetermined
Respe4Xbm s
1
0. Chris Hartung
city manage'!
Prepared by: ,
David Ellison
Senior Planner
AP oved-
Jeff y
Director of Panning
and CorAunity Development
0582s
~ y (~~A l y f ~ i h { ..e)
.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: February 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing a tract of land consisting of
approximately 5.7o acres beginning north of Hwy.
380 West and adjacent and west of Masch Branch
Road (A-9).
SUMMARY: Adoption of the accompanying ordinance and
service plan will complete the annexation
process for the proposed Tri-Steel Structures.
Inc. headquarters site. Annexation proceedings
on the balance of the Tri-Steel tract will
commence in the immediate future.
ACTION REQUIRED: Adopt the ordinance and service plan.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan
EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance
2. Service Plan
3. Map
aucc~. ~,t,~r ~J
David Ellison
senior Planner
05829
V- 4k-
Y
Y:.1 v 'rya 4e+slxr iY't p
~41 71 t4, ~i 3' 3d.r ~ ~ r J ~•t p ~ tv ia'. Yi lsa, ~ x ~ a
0?33L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAUD CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DEONN, rL AS; BEING ALL THAI' LOT, TRACT OR PAKCLL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 5.10 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEI4 SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATS OF TEXAS AND dEI`G
PART OF THE S. hUIIAR SURVEY, ABSTRkCT NO. 514, DLNTON COUNTY,
TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
4HEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, texas,
on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the 4th day of December, 1964 in the Council
Chambers for all interested persons tc state their views and
present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunityy was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the 18th day of December, 1984 in the Council
Chambers for all interested persons to state their views and
present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public iiearlnbs;
NOW9 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN'.?N, TEXAS,
HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the sere is
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitles: to all the rishts a nd
privilebes of other citizens of said City and shall be round by
the acts and ordinances of said City utw in effect or •.nieh may
hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be
subject to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes levied by
the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as
follows, co-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the S.
Huizar Survey, Abstract Number 514, and more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as described in
Ordinance No. 74.36 tracts, said point lying in the wust
right-of-way line of Masch Branch Road and 500 feet north of the
centerline of U. S. Highway 380;
THENCE north 89°21'56" west along the said present city limits a
distance of 513.50 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 51.007'11" west a distance of 216.41 feet to a point
for a corner;
A•9/TRI-S'IEEL STRUCTURE3, 114C./PACE ONE
T~F f V n i xyar' • r.' rt w . 4'L'r r t. ',Y
THENCE nortu 2051'02" east a distance of 132.88 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 87°48'54" east a distance of 106.69 feet to point for
corner;
THENCE north 56°16'35" east a distance of 178.40 feet to a point
for d corner;
THENCE north 12°54'08" west a distance of 95.07 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 88°30 24" east a distance of 390.89 feet to a point
fur a corner in the webt right-of-way line of vla:ch branch Road;
THENCE south 1°23'18" east along the west right-of-way line of
Hasch Branch Road, a distance of 472.31 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 5.70 acres of land, more or less.
SECTION It.
The above described property is hereby classified as Agricul-
tural "A" District and shall so appear on the official toning map
of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended
accordingly.
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the dov, day of
l9ds. J
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the da-y of
1985.
KICHMD U. S : ,M U
CITY Of CtNTONo TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE AIEENg CITY SECRETM
CITY Of DENTON$ TEXAS
APPKOVCD AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE 0. AIORMs ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
1
BY: ..-....~~lriv)
A-9/TRI-STEEL STRUCTURES, INC./PACE Two
Y'iCw, tieI 6F' =1 '.,ti a. sr"~',s o7 f . y w ti A". i
Y } t
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
1. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within oiie month after the effective
date of annexation,
7777' y t ~'x i[ of ♦ a ?.r r}„ p4' r a ~7 d-" Rs`r±~ f,,2
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tivs date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
xc. X11.
VV"
~ ! +iri r i
i , 4w
H
M BIPANCH G s r. .y
w
r . . w
HOW I IN
1 rE
w
a I:p r : Y e iii= ~•~~~e
p .•.1 H r _
0.- oar,
T • • ~ r ~ w ~ ~ i r ~ , r ' w w lilt
i
00 a In
fit
ff w
fit
ooo~ if
~ rn Not Ott j j ~I Ij
x 21 to
. . .
,.r i+ q rq~u aia :5 T
xt ry r~_r,y' aj, - al'e' v• ) 'H ~ "t •f~ ~ t ~ ~
P 6 Z Minutes
November 14, 1984
Page 8
D. Make a recommendation to the City Council •egarding
i the proposed voluntary annexation of 31.027 acres
located at the southwest corner of Ryan Road and
Teasley Lane (FM 2181) (A-8).
Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
petition for 31.027 acres located at the southwest
corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (FM 2181). He
stated the owner of the tract, Mr. B.L. Archer, has
submitted a change of zoning request which if approved
will permit 17 acres of single family land use, 10 acres
of multi-family cluster housing, and four acres of
general retail and neighborhood service land use. He
further stated the Planning and Community Development
Department recommends approval of this annexation
request.
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of the
proposed voluntary annexation of 3L.027 acres located at
the southwest corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane.
Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (5-0).
E. ►Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed annexation of approximately 5 acres of
land located north of Highway 380 west and adjltent
and west of Match Branch Road (A-9).
Mr. Ellison stated staff has received a preliminary plat
of a proposed five acre office development which is a
portion of a 69 acre parcel owned by Tri-Steel Struc-
tures, Inc. The preliminary plat of the Tri-Steel
Headquarters Addition (five acre office site) has been
reviewed and acctppted by the Development Review Commit-
tee and approved by resolution of the City Council.
He stated due to the location of this property in
relation to the Denton Municipal Airport, the
Development Review Committee requested submission of
a general development plan for the entire parcel. He
stated it has been the practice of the City Council
and the Planning and 'Coning Commission to recommend
annexation of parcels in the region of the municipal
airport that are experiencing development activity.
An airport master plan effort is currently underway and
staff is continuing its policy of encouraging develop
meets in proximity to the airport that have little
future liability potential insofar as height, noise, or
other potentially negative considerations are concerned.
He stated Tri-Steel Structures has cooperated with annex-
ation efforts to date and has expressed a desire to have
its preliminary and final plat approved prior to final
action in February, 1985. He stated the intent is to
begin development on the five acre office site immedi-
ately. He stated although not zoned, Tri-Steel Struc-
tures has agreed to a maximum o two stories for the
proposed office use; staff recommends continuation on
the five acres proposed to be developed.
Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend the proposed
annexation of approximately 5 acres of land located
north of highway 380 vest and adjacent and west of Match
Branch Road. Seconded by Mr. LaPorte and unanimously
carried (5.0).
g f P
. l~ R jy
v
A-9
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items
November 131 1984 Submit agenoa back-up
*November 2U, 1984 City Council sets date, time and
place for public hearing
November 21, 19b4 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
November 233 1964 Publish notice
November 2b, 1984 Submit agenda item
November 21, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
*December U4, 1984 City Council. holds public hearing
December 05, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
December U1, 1984 eublist, notice r
December 100 1.984 Submit agenda item
December 11, 1584 Submit agenda back-up
*December 18, 1984 City Council holds public nearing
December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item
January 02, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
J~'*January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
January 100 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
January 130 1985 Publish ordinance
✓ February 11, 1985 Submit agenda ir,m
,.~-February 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*February 190 1985 Final action by City Council
'Y"g i; R I er^ y
DATES 02/19/65
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T
0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
PROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND
CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 131.761 ACRES OF LAND BEGINNING SOUTH OF
ROBINSON ROAD AND EAST OF NOWLIN ROAD (A-10)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval
SUMMARY,
This to a voluntary request for annexation. The purpose to to
control land use and toning.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning and Zoning commission has recommended approval of both
the annexation and zoning
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFKCTED,
See service plan
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Respectfully submitted:
•
G. Ch
City Manager
Prypared y(:
~ l ~T1
bavid Ellison
Senior Planner
Apgrov
Jo~E e
Director of Planning
and community Development
OS54i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: February 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing a tract of land consisting of
approximately 131.761 acres of land beginning
south of Robinson Road and east of Nrwlin;Road
(A-10)
SUMMARY: The above referenced property is a part of the
670 + acre proposed Oakmont Development. Zoning
for the entire development has been approved by
Corinth and Denton with exception of the subject
131.761 acres. A change in zoning request for
the 131.761 acres will be considered on the same
agenda.
ACTION REQUIRED: Adoption of ordinance and service plan.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adoption of the ordinance and service plan
2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance
2. Service Plan
3, Map
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0554]
.r i F ~b k~ • L a N T SJ y ~ A~W " yy'!1 i A~ 1 G ~
i I
6932L
,r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENT)N, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL
OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 130.55 ACRES OF LAND LYING
AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND
BEING PART OF THE B. MERCHANT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 800, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SANE AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WKFREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public gearing
held for that purpose on the 4th day of December, 1984 in the
Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by
this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
held for that purpose on the 18th day of December, 1984 in the
Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by
this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public. hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
sane is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall hear its prorate
part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby
annexed is described as follows, to•witi
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of
the B. Herchant Survey, Abstract No. 800, and more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as described in
Ordinance No. 78.28C, said point lying 10 feet north of and 10
feet west of the most southeast cornier of said S. Merchant
Survey, Abstract No. 800;
THENCE north 83°39' west along the said present city limits, 10
feet north of and parallel to the south boundary line of said B.
Merchant Survey, a distance of 1599.9 feet to a point for a
corner;
THENCE south 1°30' west along the said present city limits a
distance of 10 feet to a tint for a corner, said point lying in
the south boundary line of said 8. Merchant Survey;
A•10/MYERS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/PACE ONE
14 N
THENCE north 85°39' west alca% the south boundary line of said
B. Merchant Survey a distant.. of 150.98 feet to a point for
corner;
THENCE north 1°08' east a distance of 3319.61 feet to a point
for a corner in the center of a road known as Nowlin Road;
THENCE south 86°41' east a distance of 1551.11 feet to a point
for corner in the present :ity limits;
THENCE south 3°07' west along said present city limits a
distance of 1173.7 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 85°32 east along said present city limits a
distance of 365.88 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 4°47' west along said present city limits a
distance of 1262.31 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 4°05' west along said present city limits, a
distance of 893.88 feet to the place of beginning and containing
130.55 acres of land, more or less.
SECTION Ile
The above described property is hereby classified as
Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION 111.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage.
troduced before the C!.ty Council on the day
of , 199.
PASSED D APPROVED by the City Council on the day
of , 19_.
I
i
i
RICHARD 0. STEMM-lTUM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECKETUT
ITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS
j C
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
A-10/MYERS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ PAGE TWO
Y W i
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by approprie.te
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4,09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation,
4h .i a_ or .-a I
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city,
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H. Planning and Zoning
i
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J, Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K, Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power,
7777T777,1; i4
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Pl.in is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other arias
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
`E v A.'4.Y..: u Ai"_ o,T ~e r t V.`ezti _ n.e a..,*.,y" { LLJ
r ,Y
JT
OAvroN C/tV
C-f CSR NTiI~C~ liMi!•S
I~Q
J
~aI~N ~v O
v J Ll4 OR
JI Cam Ica Olt
u ~ k
yI4.1I/r-~C.r ~
q-.10
:•C~rr liwirs•
i"ri 02 N M.4P
O
Sin
Single mily homes
' I 4.4 AO
`Muster Hdmes 3'
by/A
49.2 At \ f 'ZTnT1 Tract Aai*
6 Dv/Ac /r
1 Golf Course & Club Area
446 Units I ~ 6.1 Ac
tact '8-1 t
do Home
4.7 At
Goff Coursel 4.5Dv/Ao
3 1.6 A.0 62 units
l
Try
Clust
Patio HOM14s: i
t3
\ 1 1.9 Ac
\ 1 6.6 DV/Ac
1 Y \~7 UAlte
\Estate Homes
\ 14.2. Ac
\ 3 D u / A e Tr act 08- i 1'
43 units Estate Homes
30.3 At
I 3 Dw/Ac
\ / • 1 Unlls
p a r t m e tS1/ , 1J
Condominiums
.1 1.* At
16 Ou/Ac
41t Untt• 'Iwo Family` -
'.8h0~p'ing Garden Homes
"s A*] 6.7 Ac 6; 6 0 /A wo Family Garden Home
e 6.6 AC T 04 y•
6.6 DO/Ae
61 Welts ownhome Nl
3.6 At
'S Dv/A9
+ 32 Wilts
I' *Awl
wet' it 4 1-1f/ r.
3 r _
P 6 Z Minutes
November 14, 1984
Page 9
F. eke a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed voluntary annexation of 131.761 acres
of land located,aouth of Robinson Road and east of
Nowlin Road (A-10).
Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
request for 131.7bl acres of land located south of
Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road, the proposed
Oakmont Developpment, which is located in both Denton
and Corinth. He stated staff recommends approval of
the voluntary annexation of this request.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommmend the proposed
voluntary annexation of 131.761 acres of land located
south of Robinson Road and seat of Nowlin Road.
LSacondsd by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (5-0).
C. Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning he
proposed voluntary annexation of approximately 112 aces
located west of I.35E service road and north of Marshall
Road and east of the Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (A-,.2).
Ir. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation re-
cuest of approximately 112 acres located west of 1-35t
vaevics road and north of Marshall Road and east of tie
Topeka and Santa fe Railroad. He stated staff recom-
m,nds approval of this annexation request.
.tr. Escue made a motion to recommend the annexation at
roddoandanorthlo12 acres f Marshalllocated
Road andwest
eastlof5the service
Topeka
and Santa Fe. Railroad. Seconded by Ms. Cole and
unanimously carried (5.0).
H. Adoption of Policies of Planning and Zoning Commissici.
untilltheonext a meetingfwhenctne e directori of g
thesPlaniing
and Community Development Department can be present to
discuss the policies.
Mr. LaPorte stated he would like to re-word item D a
read: Those persons in opposition to the request speak
or ask questions next.
1. Recommend approval of the preliminary pplat of the
Paisley Street Addition, Block 1, Lot 1.
Mr. Persdud stated this is a tract of 0.344 acres
situated south of and abutting Paisley Street and weot
of and abuttig Ruddell Street. The site is zoned atlgle
family (SF-1) and the purpose of the preliminary pla. is
to establish two single family lots. He stated Develop-
ment Review Committee recommends approval with
conditions.
Charles Watkins repreaonting the owner of this
addition, stated he is asking for a variance on front-
age of the property as there is curb and ;utter on
Ruddell Street. He stated estimated costs for a small
job of 150' of curb and gutter would be t•11,500. Hi
stated these are hard to develop lots and they are Oned
SF-7 and we are trying to comply with that. .
Hr. Ell a on atatad there are three aiternetives
regarding perimeter street paving.
Mr Greg Edwards stated tnis tract site on a hill; the
main portion of the tract drains downhill toward Riddell.
w
1, o"
s
I it
A-10
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items
November 13, 19d4 Submit agenda back-up
*November 2U, 1984 City Council sets date, time and
place for public hearing
November 2l, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
November 23, 1984 Publish notice Y ~Yy• ~'~~r
November 2b, 1964 Submit agenda item
y November 21, 1964 Submit agenda back-up
~-*December 04, 1984 City Council holds public hearing
✓ December U5, 084 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
December U1, 1984 Publish notice t December 1U, 1984 Submit agenda item
December 11, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
*December 18, 1964 City Council holds public hearing
December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item
January U2, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
January lU, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
✓ January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance
February 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*February 1'i, 1985 Final action by City Council
DATE: MIMS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO,. Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICB PLAN ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY 112
ACRES BEGINNING NEST Or I-35N SERVICE ROAD, NORTH OF MARSHALL ROAD
AND EAST OF THE TOPEKA AND SANTA FS RAILROAD (A-12)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.
SUMMARY:
This is a voluntary annexation request. Final annexation action and
a public hearing for zoning is scheduled.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning and Zoning Commission has considered both the
annexation and zoning.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
See service plan
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Respectfully submitte
•
G. Chrt ar n
City Manager
Prepared by:
ggf, ff
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App oved:.
Jeff ya r
Director of Planning
and Community Developmeat
0530s
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHFFT
MEETING DATE: February 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 112 acres beginning west
of Highway 1-35N service road, north of Marshall
Road and east of the Topeka and $ante Fe
Railway. (A-12)
SUMMARY: The above referenced tract is owned by three (3)
individuals that have submitted a petition for
both annexation and zoning. The proposed zoning
is light industrial (LI). A change in zoning
petition will be considered by the City Council
after final annexation action is taken.
RECOMMENDATION% The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval of annexation.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt ordinance and service plan
2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan
EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance
2. Service Plan
3. Map
X-Al
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0530s
%
0934L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 111.71 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
PART OF THE B.B.B. & C.R.A. CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 141, AND
THE R. WHITLOCK SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1403, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS;
CLASSII'YING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHf.REAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the 4th day of December, 1964 in the Council
Chambers for all interested persons to state their views and
present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the 18th day of December, 1984 in the Council
Chambers for all interested persona to state their views and
present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by tt,is
ordinance; snd
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to ita effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEVTCN, TEXAS,
HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be oaund by
the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may
hereafter be enacted and the property situated Cherein shall be
subject to and shall bear its prorsta part of the taxes levied by
the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as
follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the B.B.B.
& C.A.A. Co. Survey Abstract Number 141, and the A. Whitlock
Survey, Abstract Number 1403 and more particularly described as
follows:
BEGINNING at a point Ln the present city limits as described in
Oedinance No. 65.43 Tract No. Y, said point lying 600 feet west of
the west right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 35;
THENCE south 89°58'42" west along said present city limits, a
distance of 1346.13 feet to a point for a corner in the northeast
right-u£-way of the A.T. & S.R. Railroad;
THENCE north 33°020 west, along said right-of-way, a distance of
94.68 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right with a radius
of 9091.23 feet;
A-12/HALTER DERODE-PACE ONE
SX a;. ,o.:ad i...y t , ,.S e.. •.s r. a , F ° ''a ~
_ THENCE northwesterly, along said curve and right-of -way, said
curve to west, ran arc ight with distance a radius
beginning north of33'17'16" a
curve 254.27 having to the chord
of 6800.60 feet;
THENCE northwesterly, along sail curve and right-of-way, said
curve having a chord of north 25 45'37" west, an arc distance of
1324.91 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 0°54'39" west a distance of 1165.47 feet to a point
for a corner, same being & northwest corner of a tract conveyed
to W. W. Marshall by dead recorded in Volume 416, Page 600 of the
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE south 89°57'30" east, a distance of 1961.87 feet to a point
for a corner in said present city limits;
THENCE south 4
distance of 2648.36 feet east, to the along a of b peginning city containing
111.71 acres of land more .%r leas.
SECTION It.
The above described pi!opperty is hereby classified as Agricul-
tural "A" District and shall so appear on the official toning map
of the City of Dentoi,, Texas, which map is hereby amended
accordingly.
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
Introduced Leforo tho City Council on the B04--= day
i g4r.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1985.
RICHARD U_5TEWARr,__MAY0
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,1TEXAS
a APPROVED AS TO LFGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTIN CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
A-12/WALTER DER.ODE-PAGE TWO
' ~ 2 Y ...,t t r' t•.°~. . r -~...R r r~ r Jr Z T.n taS ~?Ta 't ,~~~f <v~.R'~ fq ra r.
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
1. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter front new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties ir► the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective ~
date of annexation, 11
I
R .gyn... R* 7 } ~ . ! l'{ k"h - •'r `Y ~ :.r pr?...; y
by 4 rx r ' 4}Jy
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardo,.s
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in tt,e
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major imrrovements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date o annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed :;.n the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standP.rds and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
I
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
i
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIF of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CEP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
i
s~
J O
I y
t
tl1! is e
1 r t' f17[•~
1 M
A4-12
a KJII iIOCx 5,V A 140e
; e e B . C MA
CO sY A LAI - ' R ,
' N ware s. a ia()J `
wot --,tyr i
4.
I)A zee k : _ 1.
1 1 hAl. 11 i
~1c. r wnlnrl~y. toLA ~:a ll.r I7
1 1 R
o
~ 1 9
EetsON s• A
~ _-2- 4WrT INCI»f4
NI tlYM
t
1 1
I14
1 .5w. r
1
1\ .e o_•
vngiu Ilul 'r~ iWrr'"^~ 2O1 A(Np
1 r: I 300
,
H[L~filµAV OOWC" ►LAt
JSA 299 At
R MNITLOCA SY A LAOS t
a a b AC RRCOSVA NI a or -
M WA[Y S7 4 IIOI POW
CITYif COUNTY fOCJocw, TCt JV4JlOi A0" 1 so c
► IJI 1408 IN A Mal
• YN_• ~'1iieD!!!
na AfflAAA 9 ATw~'Liii9iie
V W.l t K AOyOC a ~ YIAJ ~w w.w
#Z,
I'
4
1
v . Rya YS. P,i k V
J J i
P Z Minutes
November 14, 1984
Page 9
F. Hake a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed voluntary annexation of 131.761 acres
of land located south of Robinson Road and east of
Nowlin Road (A-10).
Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
request for 131.761 acres of land located south of
Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road, the proposed
Oakmont Development, which is located in both Denton
and Corinth. He stated staff recommends approval of
the voluntary annexation of this request.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommmend the proposed
voluntary annexation of 131.761 acres of land located
south of Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road.
Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (5-0).
G. rMake a recommendation to the City Council concerning the
proposed voluntary annexation of approximately Ill acres
located west of 1-35E service road and north of Marshall
Road and east of the Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (A-12).
Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation re-
quest of approximately 112 acres located west of 1-35E
service road and north of Marshall Road and east of the
Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad. He stated staff recom-
mends approval of this annexation request.
Mr. Escue made a motion to recommend the annexation of
approximately 112 acres located west of I-35E service
road and north of Marshall Road and east of tt•.e Topeka
and Santa Fe Railroad. Seconded by Ms. Cole and
unanimously carried (5-0).
H. Adoption of Policies of Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Ellison stated staff recommends tabling this item
until the next meeting when the director of the Planning
and Community Development Department can be present to
discuss the policies.
Mr. La Forte stated he woL)d like to re-word item D to
read: Those persons in opposition to the request speak
or ask questions next.
1. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the
Paisley Street Addition, Block 1, Lot 1.
Mr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 0.344 acres
situated south of and abutting Paisley Street and vest
of and abuttig Ruddell Street. The site is zoned single
family (SF-7) and the purpose of the preliminary plat is
to establish two single family lots. He stated Develup-
ment Review Committee recommends approval with
conditions.
Charles Watkins, representing the owner of this
addition, stated he is asking for a variance on front-
age of the property as there is curb and gutter on
Ruddell Street. He stated estimated costs for a small
job of 150' of curb and gutter would be $11,500. He
stated these are hard to develop lots and they are zoned
SF-7 and we are trying to comply with that.
Mr. Ellison stated there are three alternatives
regarding perimeter street paving.
Mr Greg Edwards stated tnis tract site an a hill; the
main portion of the tract drains downhill toward Ruddell.
* S ~ Xy r, . L ni~ •.n N r'R `a`' s • n~ J a 1 ~ 7 ~ 'a .f ~ i 'T ti
A-12
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items
November 138 1984 Submit agenda back-up
*November 20, 1984 City Council sets date, time and
piace for public hearing
November 21, 1984 Notice to Denton Aecord Cnronlcj*!
November 23, 1984 Publish notice + -L.:` C
4 November 26, 1984 Submit agenda item
November 27, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
v.*December U4, 1984 City Council holds public hearing
December 05, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Cnronicle
Uecember 07, 1984 Publish notice
December 10, 1984 Submit agenda item
December 11, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
*December lb, 1984 City Council holds public hearing
December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item
January 01, 1985 Submit agenda pack-up
*January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
January 10, 1985 Urdinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance
February 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*February 19, 1985 Final action by City Council
• a C r. s, d r ~i`r, t
7
DATE: 02/19/85`
CITY COUVCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 0140
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CASE Z-1702
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1702 at iti meeting
of October 24, 1984 and voted 6-0 to recommend approval suYject to
conditions attached.
SUMMARY:
The site comprlses 31.027 acres situated at the southwester) corner
of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane Intersection.
BACKGROUND:
The planned development proposals are compatible with the policies
of the Denton Development Guide. Conditions of approval are
attached to ensure strict site design and proper compliance w th the
Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable
Respectfully submitted:
a /P. , a - -
G. Wit n r
City Manager
Prepared by:
Harry PdWsaud
Development Review Planner
A rove
b%U
Jeff a
Director of Planning
and Community Development 08448
g~,5r yin'^P e z' w I f {j''^ \ yr, ' k .w ti d,"~-° q° " y
r .rte A~
3
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1702 Meeting Date: February 19, 1985
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Charles S. Watkins representing
B. L. Archer, owner
3525 Cedar Springs
Dallas, TX 75219
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the agricul-
tural (A) classification to the
planned development (PD) classifi-
cation. If approved, the PD will
permit the following uses:
1. Seventeen acres of single family
housing with a density of 5.6
units per acre.
2. Ten acres of multi-family cluster
housing with a density of 17
units per acre.
3. Four acres of general retail and
general service type uses.
Location and Size: This is a tract of 31.027 acres of
land situated at the southwestern
corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane
intersection.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: .forth - Denton West Mobile Home Park;
MF-1
South - Star C Ranch; A
East - Lakewood Estates Mobile Home
Park; MF-1
West - Existins• Ranch; PD-22
Denton Development Guider Area is designated as low intensity.
iJ
JVJ
(Case 7.'-1702)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainages This tract is located on a hill which
should allow the developer to sub-
divide without major drainage costs.
It is recommended that the existing
pond at the northeast corner of the
site be used for detention,
Transportation: Ryan has been designated a collector
street and it would require 120'
right-of-way and perimeter street
paving. Teasley Lane is a major
arterial that needs 120' right-of-way
and no residential access will be
allowed.
Utilities: Eight (8) inch diameter water line is
available on east side of FM 2181.
There is need for a 30" diameter
water line to serve this site. The
City may participate in oversizing.
A lift station is located in the
northwest corner of FM 2181 and Ryan
Road. This lift station will need
additional pumps. Service can only
be connected after a parallel gravity
line has been installed by Dimension
Development and Southridge joint
venture.
ANALYSIS
The proposals to use and develop land within this planned devel-
opment (PD) district are compa`.ible with the Denton Development
Guide policies.
A. ~rtment concentration in low intensity areas
According to the Guide, anything above 12 units per acre is
classified as apartments. The PD proposal to develop 10
acres of multi-family cluster housing with a density of 17
units per acre will result in 170 units in one concentration.
The Development Guide limits the number of units in one con-
centration to 200 for low intensi' areas.
v,
(Case # Z-17G.
Page Three
ANALYSIS (Continued)
B. High density housinq_requires access through secondary
arterials
The Development Guide policies require multi-family housing
developments to have direct access to a secondary arterial
road or greater in low intensity areas. The objective is to
avoid traffic build up, congestion and noise pollution in
single family zones. The proposal for multi-family develop-
ment on this site will have access on the east to Teasley
Lane, a primary major arterial, and on the north to Ryan
Road, a secondary arterial road.
C. Small, scattered concentrations of neighborhood commercial
office, etc.
The objective of the Development' Guide is to allow, to some
extent, mixed use developments in low intensity use areas.
The Guide recommends specific co.icentration standards to
limit the size and intensity for neighborhood commercial and
office development. The proposed planned development dis-
trict allocates 4 acres for general retail and service type
uses. According to the Guide, a maximum of 4 acres of neigh-
borhood retail uses can be allowed in low intensity areas.
D. Strict site design review of all_Ero ects within 1 block of
single family dwellings.
- I
The objective of this policy is to protect neighborhood
character. If this PD is approved, the City Council will
have no control over which aspect of this development (multi-
family, single-family, or commercial) is implemented in the
first or later phases. In order to ensure that development
takes p13ce in an orderly manner and to prevent any kind of
intrusion into this neighborhood in the future, it is impor-
tant to control matters related to maximum lot coverage;
front, rEar and side yard setbacks, site layouts; building
heights, etc.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1702 at its
meeting on October 241 1984 and voted 6-0 to recommend approval
with the following conditions:
(Case # Z-1702)
Page Four
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
1. The design and construction of buildings should encourage
compatible architectural style with a view of achieving
visual and aesthetic harmony within the neighborhood.
2. Multi-family housing which abuts single family housing
should not exceed two-story construction height.
3. Adequate screening should be provided to protect multi-
family housing from commercial retail activities and also to
buffer single family housing from multi-family developments.
4. Parking lot lights should be positioned away from
residential buildings.
5. The placement of signs should be restricted to the size and
scale of the development which usually means attached to the
building face.
6. The platting and building requirements for single family
housing (SF-7) including front, side and rear setbacks, maxi-
mum lot coverage, etc. shall be applicable to the proposed
single family development (SF-6).
7. All other engineering, planning, and building requirements
not controlled by these conditions must conform to the
Zoning and Land Development Regulations and other plans and
ordinances of the City of Denton.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with additional conditions
2. Approve petition without conditions
3. Deny the petition
ATTACHMENTS _
1. Location map
2. Reply form totals
3. Property owner list
4. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
October 24, 1984
0844g
•.r. r1n.i rrr _w rw " ra'~y, gin. a<: r- r •n'r. p.~. ~w 'w"~..
1 PD- 20
PD-45
PD-65 c
+ ~Sr• 16 F 1
PD-7
r fi
a A 3
SF- 13 PD- 68
S-140 I
IPU~Ir
~_ZM1702
S•I E,6 r + ' i
i PD-22 i
I ,
r
1 r! f~. M•!4l r
1 Rr•ev Vrv H.r r n.ca r J' q _ q l r
n N l ; s11
y, ,•nru 4-, LAC
Yr 1 _ _ _
ICJ 1'SA I ~ (-1 ,r i•.l.V r~ h ii V•
_ „ \ YJIII ~ YI I I N
y..
• ,ho 1a • 2
N en. f n I r Ac ~ vKIHITV Nip
f
It
' - r
_ ~ arr `Ei'idw 1 J
--I r s r. l • % ``IU T 1.
r cwsTCa '
A
♦ ~ X t \ \ rr ~I •ocas r .,nra If ..a.r. w. r.
S +
Vt 10 f ` r r J 1 4 I Nf .r It rt . t
"
TJ +w.a n •
I r a.q Ir rn •r iJ.. I,q. a rK
hiM eni LI / YI J I / ` 1 ii_VV V r.., ..N or .r h♦
11364, P 1 ~2_ r rt rT ! I, 1
Ira
af.r
to WN
l\
' r-
~n J ~ JiLI -
' r
~I~i~ h + rf `!'1• •u b is 41 to f K 17 L•
rer ~ f ' ~ it w.' i
/1 re r t"a' ..is -1 !a if 1• 1 Je !t a
• - - _ [all _ _ _
r .,~0 '
r+.ff.a
010
IIRy,fir ' ,
fIR VIV,fI ~ V '
cALLta 51 02,) k OSAWe
£Lt C1CK£TT SURVEY A 1018 T112
DrMTON cOVNTYr T£YAS $52, tt01R ~sA,~ ,y ~ 4_...-__•~-_.
Qklf~, it 7
ELI pICKCIF XMI4LYI►p
• ~.r nV•v-n t
2i•C
r. ff
" a tPROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1702
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received None Received
r t
.
A 1 0 e ".r
M4
. it
~Q
ate/
0 1)
L, 43z/ 1 cu -Tat li vi I
66 00201
111 04 ' n tiY t zt I.'
~ s
a.
Z minutes <
October 24, 1984
Page S
I
Mir. Ellison stated he would like to clarify that this
request also requires City Council action.
Mr. Morrie stated since this is not a zoning change and
it is a specific use permit, it would take a major vote.
Mr. Tom Roberts stated he was representing Harshaw
Properties and gave the history of the property. He
stated he has worked with city staff to propose a site
amendment plan to develop a total of 41 additional
spaces. He stated his desire is to make a desireable
park and to upgrade it from its present condition and
n fact have already upgraded in excess of $100,000 to
date. He stated there is a requirement of a boat
storage area and is ssking for a waiver of that.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Ms. Spivey stated this stte is loco A in a low
intensity area. According to the Denton Development
Guide, there are six criteria that should be met when
mobile homes are proposed in a low intensity area. She
read the criteria. She stated this proposal varier, from
the Mobile Home Park Ordinance in that there is no area
reserved for veh.cle/boat storage and the street align-
ment now wets the specifications of the ordinance.
Staff canhVt rcommend approval ^f this request due
to the lark of compliance Frith the Mobile Home Park
Ordinance.
Mr. Sidor asked Mr. Roberts why he does not wish to
comply with the regulations.
Mr. Roberts :tsted there are no economics that allow for
this. He stated it is just not economically feasible
for a boat end storage area.
On question from Mr. Claiborne Mr. Clock stated there
would need to b.: some channel Improvements.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Laforts made a motion to recommend approval of site
plan amendment for S-154. Seconded by Mr. Pearson and
unanimously carried (6.0).
C. L-11702. This is the petition of Charles S. Watkins,
representing B. L. Archer (owner), requesting the
establishment of alanned development district (PD)
under article 11 UL the Denton Zoningg Ordinance in
respect of a tract of 31.027 acres of land situated
at the southwestern corner of Ryan Road and Teasley
Lane intersection. Tne site is currently outside of
the boundaries of the City of Denton and annexation
procedures are pendi 11 appproved, zhe planned
development districtPD) will permit the following
developments:
17 acres - single family housing (SF-6) with a
density of approximately 5.6 units per acre
10 acres - multi-family cluster housing
with a densityy of 17 units per acre
4 acres - general retsil and general service
type uses,
Mr. Persaud stated there were four rr ly forma mailed to
property owners$ one was returned in favor and zero in
opposition.
MjF .<7" ire l t~{ m A Y
b? ~'k ' 1 r ~ . x y
P 6 Z Minutes
Octobor 24, 1984
Page 6
Charles Watkins stated he was representing Mr. B.L.
Archer. He stated the property Js outside the city
limits and we are requesting to be annexed. He des-
cribed the proposed is consistent with Denton Develop-
ment Guide policies. He stated he has discussed the
conditions required by staff with the petitioner and he
is agreeable.
Mr. R.J. Button, owner and developer of Lakewood
Estates, stated his property is directly across the
street from the proposed and he is in favor of the
request. however, he would like to know now water will
service this property. He stated he had spent $80,000
for a ten inch water line and quite simply, would like
to get some of his money back. He stated he would like
to see a condition attacned requiring the developer to
tie in on Ryan Road so he could get a reimbursement.
Mr. Rimfield stated as he understands the Subdivision
Regulations, there is no reimbursement.
On question from Hr. LaPorte, Mr. Morris read from the
Subdivision Regulations concerning pro-rata agreements.
Barbara Byrd stated she feels the basic problem is the
traffic patterns which are 10 years behind schedule.
She stated Lillian Miller Parkway should be oix lanes
according to an article in the Dallas Morning News. She
stated you are adding density and we are at a crisis
stale already. She added the scLool system is already
at full capacity.
Mr. Sidor stated concerning the zoning request Z-1700
that was previously tabled, Loop 286 is a major arterial
and is adequate to serve traffic and further, the state
will not widen the road until traffic warrants it. He
also stated our Major Thoroughfare Plan ultimately ties
Loop 288 into Mayhill Road.
Mr. Persaud stated Ryan Road has been designated a major
arterial and it would require 120 feet of right-of-way
and perimeter atreet paving. He stated Teasley Lane is
a primary major arterial that needs 120 feet right-of-
way and no residential access will be allowed. He
stated the proposals to use and develop land within
this planned development district are compatible with
the Denton Development Guide policies. He further
stated staff recommends approval of Z-1702 with condi-
tions.
on question from Mr. LaForte Mr. Persaud stated there
are future plans for street Improvements, however, I
don't feel there is a major traffic problem at this time.
Mr. Sidor questioned condition number one, asking who
decides what is compatible architectural atyle and
aesthetic harmony.
Hr. Ellison stated it is true, Development Review
Committee works with developers and our goal is
consistency. He stated if the Commission feels
uncomfortable with that as a condition, could recom-
mend that it not go to City Council as 's conditi6ft
Mr Olyai stated the off-ramp on I.15E, at Loop 258
going south, is the responsibility of the state, end
they have been notified numerous times. He;daserlbed
the traffic patterns in the area of the proposed. He
d; t o y t~ Y
P S[ Z Minutes
October 24, 1984
Page 7
gave the vehicle trips per day, per acre for each of the
areas proposed. He added the existing facilities are
adequate to handle the amount of traffic.
Hr. Pearson asked when the city requires a develuper to
install a water line, don't they consider future
development.
Mr. Clark stated the oversizing was not discussed at
that time and all the city could require the developer
to pay for was an eight inch (8") line to service that
development.
Mr. Vakins stated the reason we are requesting the land
ua: plan that we are is because it is compatible with
tFe Denton Development Guide. He stated they understand
there would have to I)e improvements made to Ryan Road.
He stated he doesn't understand why the city did not
oversize the waterlines at the time they were installed,
however, if the Commission would like to attach a condi-
tton to tie onto the water on the east side of Ryan, we
would be willing to do that.
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-1702 with the following conditions:
1) The design and construction of buildings should
encourage compatible architectural style with a view
of achieving visual and aesthetic harmony within the
neighborhood.
2) Multi-faraiiy housing which abuts single family
housing should not exceed two-story construction
height.
3) Adequate screening should be provided to protect
multi-family housing from commercial retail activ-
ities and also to buffer single family housing from
multi-family developments.
4) Parking lot lights should be positioned away from
residential buildings.
5) The placement of signs should be restricted to the
size and scale of the development which usually
means attached to the building face.
6) The platting and building requirements for single
family housing (SF-7) including front, side and rear
setbacks, maximum lot coverage, etc. shall be applic-
able to the proposed single family development
(SF-6).
7) All other engineering, planning, and building
requirements not controlled by theme conditions must
conform to the Zoning and Land Development
Regulations and other plans and ordinances of the
City of Denton.
Mr. Pearson seconded and motion carried unanimously
L L-0).
D. Z-1703. This is the petition of Henry S._ Miller Cos any
requesting a change in toning from the agricultural
district to the planned development (PD) district on a
243.3 acre tract located on the north lido of 1.35E,
a proximately 10800 feet east of Loop 68. tf approved,
the planned development will permit the following usest
7 7
DATiC1 02/19185
CTY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 9.
r
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Kanager
SUM M PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CASE Z-1706
RMKMRNDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Comission considered this item at its
meeting of December 12, 1984 and voted to recommend approval of
Z-1706 by a vote of 7-0 with conditions.
SUMKARY:
This is a request for the establishment of a mixed use planned
development on a 131.7 acre tract located on the east side of Nowlin
Road approximately 2,200 feet south of Robinson Road. If approved,
the planned development will permit multi-family, single family,
,.luster homes, neighborhood shopping and golf course land use.
BACKGROUND:
This request is a portion of the 765 acre Oakmont development
located in Denton and Corinth. The portion in the city limits was
previously appeoveJ. Approval of this request is contingent upon
annexation approval at this same meeting. The request is consistent
with Development Guide policy of housing diversification.
PROGRAMS, D.;PARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There to no impact on the general fund
Rospe~ul ubm t 04
•
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Denise Spi eytl-
De:#elopment Review Planner
App ved•
Jeff Me e
i Dlrector'of Plann_n6
sad Cosssunity Development 0663s
f'
PLANNI.%G AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: Denton City Council
Case No.: 7.. 170u --Meeting Dates -February 191 1985
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Myers Development Corporation
1200 Shady Shores Drive
Corinth, Texas 76205
Status of Applicant: Prospective owner and developer
Requested Action: The establishment of planned
development (PD) zoning. If
approved, the planned development
will permit the following land
uses:
1. Multi-family - approximately
221 units on 12.3 acres with a
density of 18 units per acre.
2. Cluster homes - approximately
252 units on 42 acres with a
density of 6 units per acre.
3. Single family - approximately
6 units on 2.1 acres with a
density of 3 units per acre.
4. Patio homes - approximately 82
units on 12.6 acres with a
density of 6.5 units per acre.
5. Estate homes - approximately
45 units on 15.1 acres with a
density of 3 units per acre.
6. Two family garden homes -
approximately 60 units on 9.2
acres with a density of 6.5
units per acre.
7. Neighborhood shopping - on
approximately 2.6 acres.
8. Golf course - approximately
34.4 acres.
a r asp.,! ~i-P_~yac? r. Y ~.t F r. Z'.; n ✓
i N:~ 7r ,'a y "1 +
(Case #Z-1706)
Page 2
GENERAL INFORMATION (Continued)
Location and Size: A 131.7 acre tract located on the
east side of Nowlin Road approxi-
mately 2,200 feet south of Robinso
Road
Existing Land Uses Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Vacant, agricultural;
outside city limits
South - Vacant, agricultural;
outside city limit
East - Vacant, agricultural;
outside city limit
West - Vacant, agricultural;
outside city limit
Denton Development Guides Area not covered by Denton
Development Guide.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
- - - - - -
Utilities: Please refer to the attached for
utility information. Electric,
telephone and gas service is
available for extension to the
site.
Drainage: Detention should be used with golf
course lakes for drainage to the
south of this tract.
Transportations This tract has frontage on Nowlin
Road, currently a county road with
a proposed 60 feet of right-of-way.
The site will have frontage on
Lake Sharon Drive, a proposed
thoroughfare with 100 feet of
right-of-way.
1 ~ S; ~ n ".A t
d 'Y 'la 1` ,.H Iw., t Y
(Case #2-1706)
Page 3
ANALYSIS
The 765 acre proposed Oakmont development site ie located on
the snutheastern edge of the City of Denton. The site
contains approximately 205 acres (278) of the total
development within the city limits of Denton and 560 acres
(738) of the total development within the city limits of
Corinth. Dual jurisdiction over the site has caused some
problems in the review and evaluation of this project. The
developer9r, have received zoning approval from the City of
Corinth and are awaiting Denton's decision in this matter.
Annexation is currently in progress on this tract.
This development provides a relatively new dimension in urban
design in residential areas. The concept plan provides for
20.38 of the site to be used for a golf course intend3ed to
accomodate both active and passive forms of re:reational
activities. These greenbelt areas will also serve to enhance
the protection of natural floodplain areas and at the same
time create a better quality residential neighborhood.
The development provides for a mixture of housing types
ranging from s',r,gle family detached structures with a density
of three unite per acre to multi-family areas with a density
of eighteen iinits per acre. Diversity of housing types is a
goal of the Denton Development Guide and will eccomodate a
range of life styles and inccme groups.
The areas reserved for two family garden homes, cluster
homes, and patio homes are well within the standard ior a
moderate area with densities of 6 and 6.5 units per acre
respectively. The site reserved for the development of
sinole family detached structures and estate homes are well
within the standards for low intensity areas with a density
of 3 dwelling units per acre, The total number of proposed
apartments, 221 units is slightly over the 200 unit limit for
low intensity areas specified by the Development uuide. This
multi-family section also serves as a buffer between the
residential areas and the 2.6 acre neighborhood Shopping area
which complies with the Development Guide limit of four (4)
acres of retail in a low intensity area.
i
Y, R fly M1 ft' y,~ f 1 y J
rstio_
Y 'o - - F Y 1:'',
(Case tZ-1706)
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION
Since the proposal is well within the standard for a low
intensity area, provides diversified housing types, and is an
example of innovative urban design, the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval of Z-1706 by a vote of 7-0
with the following conditions
That the lot width, lot depth, lot area, building height,
floor area ratio, and required parking for each area
conform to the attached development standards for each
land use.
- -
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with conditions
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
3. Approve petition without conditions
4. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Map
2. Oakmont site plan
3. Memo from City~Ehjinder
4. Utility',informdtionn
5. Development standards sheets
6. Reply forms total
7. Property owner list
6. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the meeting of
December 12, 1984
05489
I T:
+'t ~ ~ ~ ~ r . ` ~ a ~ • 'i, rt~~ ~k.i ~ ha 7 n'; W r r .1 _ . : j:: ~'r.4"~"~ ~t ~ a ,
G~,. . .
Me ooey it. * a I.
t~ 0 / 1 1
rooter ltd. t -
Mayhill
rl 1
to OAK POIN
oolto Rf ° I mp MOIL
SHAAY SHORE
O
cane tone , ; , ► * 5.43 . ,
i A an f
into
• r Aeptrtean rid ~ ~ ~
,.r
{rlCRery;\,;C►ee k Rd' ' N7►' J ~ .may } C.
. CORINTH 1 r
POP 66, t v!
lSE I t
,
'014
Alf~j. 4% r.
Zme @1 70 41
A-21 ~r
I IMP lop
LAKE
• - r DALLAS
"Ito, mop 1,491
d I
H K Y
or
• Mie'Aor o " \ > PO 116 J f
O'S Ott
t Pot ?40'f 11 • '.o r3 HIGHLAND. a 'b
DOUBLE OAK VILLAGE
a apP sib ' I - Oenlon, No V
t~ POp 200 E94 Q 1 9 eaS fI s
. , IIIru111M
, 6W.w►r r CIrwMM:1►M1N ~
DIVILO/YlpT DATA ~Ih Na.. ry
I/ f~r11
' •YN \ MII II,r1 h I.
■1YfWlllr' 1 ~ ~ • ~~~'r~ '1
Ir,W nary Won, "1.,, 11.1 11, 1 111 , 1 Q`-I« 1jr1 _ 7
1•N
IU,r• Film, ❑"Ind •,.N 1. ) 1 1 u'. •II► /
w'u•r..~a wwl t/ 1 1J.4 Irr Y'11Y/, r `~lA}.~ t. 1
CYI omp Wee. Cr,rr lfl~fb' •'•~w :"`~r1 ` f1. II• LI Ir • t
11» f•rl'Pf Ya..,»V r i
"Able Mnu lot 11 1 , 11.1 ,
• •r 11 Ir.f111 I / I, rF
IM~NN "win 1.7 L4 p\ 11.1 x..11 , x1'1 1•
'1 w Y r F
will,
r Ir.CerW
184111.1046t
1,r.Yllr Ga."" 11.1 11 / 11\ 11 1 . I I I 61
` P, w ~ I
tful'~r n•y .I-r.•. ,
OIMr pow 1 ►►'N /111x11 M•111I i '
1~J~.1 IrMI '
Om
two, .a uN Moll n , H 1 +A rY LfMx C'1rMY11~ r'
rl r U\/~Ip• l
1 ~Y 1111
low 1)01 1/1 114 CI I 111*
f ' Joe. of a" title wO
I\\Illaw 0011/
4.44
t
mr w W 11M.IFi l
N ' k. 111.N1
Ir 1 } ii,•ri ,
eu1 Fir
IMI IWIf MIIII nIr 13~
r / I C'
r., 111 \1~ ~
I-r OU
cow
V
1
&Ib
4L If Pbb~
1 /v 7
r
t 11» frlN 7.r .a.♦.. Irw r
• tfrl M 1 if 01-04- -0 •r1 Y-r
am 1Q.1 i
VIII ' ,f»
aM f•'
, Y 6looli 'I w r
1
11 bi'l• • ' 111,1 pule 1 1 ...r
1. P .w t
. iI of
NHf IN~II
• :br t-1
• tNN04'r ?Aar~
Go CAIN 1 C\It 1x1/1 - ~ ~ILCFi'
y I r Fin Ln V
rMl 'bl '
e1M
Al MIN w,ll 'Pr
1i.re rl1rrt Roble,
' '*/r'1•Ir 11'1: '
' C'►NY IIIIIIN
lu
Y
l llry 11y• _
Id:. ~1M•. Zoning EXh&tt tor:
Ir ;
will
OAKMONT
` * Donton/CorlntA,Taus
• T
MNiN•1r If
• ~r 1 11HI IIgIN•11111rL A
t • J' ~ 1111 N.YM b•. I
r« r w/,
111•
' • •1 ~~~1li Y. 1`1'1 IrM16'11N h,rNl At
Y w y i1 ININ t-"4*lII top.
f11/IMhIN II
1/ UIN y
/,IIN. 1101 N ,I N
z ~ 170
} I. µ '1A rl i ~ 6 8 .r. ~ r C p isll ? 0
~ Srr 4~r; ~ rr.1~ r i 1 r't~.y A, Vo r r v ~ ~~1 i~ 7 rr y .y.~t y~ h i e
' COrYofDEWON,TfXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ! DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE(817)566.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 4, 1984
TO: Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Oakmont
Several issues have been presented to Myers Development on the
Oakmont Subdivision.
1) Loop 288 in the powerline easement on a western corner -
requires 120' right-of-way
2) Thoroughfare from Corinth ties to Robinson Road. 80'
Right-of-Way as shown is acceptable along with location
3) Thoroughfare Oki south boundary line with 100'
right-of-way should be in proper place and adequate size
to extend into Dentoa
4) Detention should be used with golf cour5c lakes for
drainage to south. (Recommendation)
5) Detention should be used for drainage across 1-35 to
north to negate efforts of development. Apply to all
tracts in Denton as requirement
6) Sidewalks along collector sized or greater streets as per
subdivisi n regulations.
Citr E~8eerP.E.
y
is
#0269E
f~w
+ ~<< A w a~.:PprohY ~'.(.Jh r j Y1i'~i1 Y i " Y .d. -"tl lro 4h -7~
Fy ie~re ~ ",i 3 Y h;r tT rd' ~ I 3L~ C; Y 0 7.n _ 1 r.a ~I? ,e, !.1 ~.e:~ ti ~ sr-'SY iry°
Y.
Oakmont Utility Information
1. A review of the sanitary sewer system available for this
portion of the development within the Cit Limits would only
permit the 43.4 Acres of Commercial) shopping use and about 120
units of residential use, either elusterhouses, single family,
or multifamily. Additional capacity may need to be added in
existing lift station.
2. Any further tie on to the Denton sanitary sewer system by
Developers would require either (1)a properly sized sewerline
from this development to the Pecan Creek Treatment Plant(21"
size plus oversiziflg to a 27" size with city participation)
or (2) sufficient mo";y placed in escrow to construct a future
equivalent 21" size with city participation to 27" size.
in this second case, Developer could tie on to existing 24"
Hickory Creek interceptor at this time.
3. The existing 141/12" waterlines serving Corinth and WW,leton
Village are sufficient to serve this development. Looping
of 12" size would be necessary to insure proper water distri-
bution aA compliance with Hogan and Rasor maoter plan for the
City of Denton.
4. Any portion outside City Limits required for approval at this
time will need Public Utility Board, Planning and zoning,
and City Council approval.
5. Pro Rata charges will be required along 21" sanitary sewer
interceptor at 1-35.
6. Pro Rata agreements may be approved by the Public Utility
Board for offsite developer investments for water and sewerline.
!f• d ey . 5[ /
i it. ^ f „3 4 ` 9 s n 4{ i ~Y'^" .5 J p';(f t rti' w '~b d fS~.W Y a`'
SINOA FAMILY R MS
ONFINITIONs
ti
Single Family dwelling units are another form of detached
housing. These residential areas are designed to provide single
` family housing at a higher density than permitted in the Estate
Home areas. These residential lots will have access and frontage
on a private or public road. Typically, tnese unite will be one
and to-.4o story structures.
PERMITTED USESI
' Single family dwellings as outlined herein
' All uses as permitted in the Estate Home areas. Reference
Estate Home "Permitted Uses"
REQUIREMMSs
Hei ht Re uirementss No building shall exceed thirty-six
feet or two an one-hAlf (2-1/2) vtories in height.
Area Reguireventss
Froclt Yare There shall be a front yard having a
required depth of not less than twenty-five (25)
feet.
Side Yard - There shall be a side yard on each side
of the lot having a width of not less than five (5)
feet. A side yard adjacent to a street shall not be
less than fifteen (15) feet,
t Rear Yard - There shall be a rear yard having a depth
o not ess than twenty (20) feet.
Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than seven-thousand, seven-hundred
(7,700) square :set.
Lot Width - The average width of any lot shall not he
less ~ hen seventy (70) feet.
j Lot Depth - The average depth of the lot shall not be
less than one-hundred, ten (110) feet, except that a
corner or cul-de-sac lot may have less depth provided
that the minimum depth is no less than one-hundred
(100) feet.
Minimum Dwelling S~ize~ - The minimum floor area of any
dwelling unit shall be one-thousand, five-hundred
(1,500) square feet.
,
0
L[
.u
1yy pp y
11
a ~ ~ d^- r y'~ 1 t r 'L ;grf; t'• 1` M ~ t ~ ;f.~4 G ..rl e',''T. 'j` Lot overage - In no case shall
more than forty-five
45 percent of the total lot area be covered by the
combined area of the main buildings and accessory
"buildings.
Parking Regu.irementas A minimum of two (2) off-street
parking spaces shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
NOTES
As a part of the above parking requirements, an
enclosed garage shall be provided for each dwelling
unit. This enclosed garage area shall be of
sufficient size to accomodate one car or a garage
space of at least twelve (12) by twenty (20) feet.
Building_Material&s All dwelling units shall be
constructed of masonry, stucco, or of a glass building
material of the kind usually used for outside wall
construction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent o- the area of the outside walls.
Residential Densitvs
Densit - These residential areas will provide for a
max mum of 3.5 dwelling units per acre.
NOTES All calculations for development intensities
shall bt; based on.the gross area for each tract as
indicated on the Zoning Exhibit.
r
r 9
i
;s f.ts' ~ d' ~ ~ b?M A r j .,S +a a
r M1 t:{ L p.' ~G p 't • t ~~:~1 A '1 . Ike . . «.Y"f,
AP71.Z'A~lITS/CONDOMIN IUMS
DUPIBITIONs
Apartments and/or Condominiums will provide another form of
multi-family housing. These multi-family units will consist of
flats (single level units) and studios (two level units) or a
combination thereof. The apartment or condominium structures
i' will range from two (2) units pdr building to sixteen (16) units
per building. Occupancy of the apartment units will be based on
a rental or lease agreement of the interior unit only. Ownership
of the condominium units will be in the form of fee simple
ownership of the living unit only. These apartment and/or
condominium areas are usually located adjacent to major streets
and serve as a buffer or transition from 66 office; ommerctal
development or heavy automobile traffic and medium or low density
residential development.
PERMITTED USE^A:
Multi-family units as outlined herein
All uses as permitted in the Villa areas
i
NOTEe All lesser and different uses as permitted within
the Apartment areas shall be .-%verned by the requirements
as set forth for that particular type of use
REMIREMENTSe
Height Requirements: No building shall exceed forty (0)
feet or two and one-half (2-1/2) stories in height.
Area Reauirementse
Front Yard - ''here shall be a front yard having a
required depth of not less than twenty (20) feet.
Side Yard - There shall be a side yard on each side
oofthe of having a width of not less than ten (10)
feet. A building separation of fiftean (15) feet
shall be observed between structures. A side yard
ad jacant to a street shall not be less than fifteen
(15) feet.
Rear Yard - There shall 'je a rear yard having a depth
of not-less than twenty (20) feet.
's
NOTEe Apartment/Condominium units shall have a
minimum setback of thirty-five (35) feet from any
single family use.
Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than sixteen-thousand (16,000) square
} feet.
20
+t
}
}
.
-
jWN
q;+ + a hr n ~Yi M hr ~ r, r .C. , •r:
' d F Z VV. I
Lot Width - The average width of the lot shall not be
less than ninety (90) feete
LLoot~Db thh - The average depth oe the lot shall not be
Imam than ninety (90) feet.
Minimum ^wellin Size - The minimum floor area of any
wenq unit sha12 be five-hundred (500) squ~krn feet
for flats (single level units) and seven-hundred,
fifty (750) square feet for studios (two level
units).
K
Lot Coveraaa - In no case shall more than fifty (50)
percent of the total, lot area be covered by the
combined area of the main buildings.
Parking Requirements A minimum of two (2) marking
spaces shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
f
Building_Materialss All dwelling units shall be
constructed of niasoa:y, stucco, or of a glass buildinq
material of the kind usually used for outside wail
constriction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent of the area of the outside walls.
Residential Densitys
Density. - Theee residential areas will provide for a
maximum of 24.0 dwelling units per acre. The specific
f number of dwelling units per acre for each
t apartment/condominium tract is indicated on the
Zoning Exhibit.
NOTES All calculations for development intensities
shall be based on the gross area for each tract as
indicated on the Zoning Exhibit.
c
E
I
f
21
1 '
f
-
CLUEMB 8OMEs
DXTIVITION s
Cluster Homes consist of single family detached units that
are clustered in groups of a slightly higher density than
conventional single family homes. Thf,s concept promotes a higher
density in the area that is actually developed while creating
open space which may be commonly owned and maintained by the
homeowners. Ownership of these homes would involve the units as
E well as the lot on which the units are sited. These lots would
have front, rear and aide yards. Typically, these units would be
one and two story structures.
PERMITTED VSESs
' Single family dwellings as outlined herein
' All uses as permitted in the Single Family areas
RI7p11Sit'tE WMTS s
Height Le uirementss No building shall exceed thirty-
four feet or two (2) stories in height.
Area Requirements
Front Yard - There shall be a front yard having a
required depth of not less than twenty-five (25)
feet.
Side Yard - There shall be a side yard on each side
of the lot having a width of not less than five (5)
feet. A side yard adjacent to a street shall not be
I, less than ten {10) feet.
Rear Yard - There shall be a rear yard having a depth
o not as than ten (10) feet.
Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than four-thousand, five-hundred (4,500)
square feet.
Lot Width - The average width of any lot shall not be
lass than fifty (50) feet.
LotDepth - The average depth of the lot shall not be
less than ninety (90) feet, except that a corner or
cul-de-sac lot may have less depth provided that the
minimum depth is not less than eighty-five (85) feet.
Minimum Dwelli` Size - The minimum floor area of any
dwelling un t shall be one-thousand, two-hundred,
i fifty (1,250) square feet,
10
:_r
r i
• v.... ~ i a ~~d i tin J by ~ - 3 x ~ `,y ~ ter ~ t 'w a.a , s .
1
Lot Covora e - In no case shall more than sixty (60)
percent o the total lot area be covered by the
combined area of the main buildings and accessory
buildings.
Parkin _B guirementss A minimum of two (2) off-street
park ng spaces shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
NOTES
As a part of the above parking requirements, an
enclosed garage shall be provided for each dwelling
unit. This enclosed garage area shall be of
sufficient size to accomodate one car or a garage
space of at least twelve (12) by, twenty (20) feet.
Building Materialss All dwelling units shall be
constructed of maeonry, stucco, or of a glass building
material of the kind usually used for outside wall
construction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent of the area of the outside walls.
[residential Densitys
Density - These residential areas will provide for a
maximum of 6.0 dwelling units per acre.
NOTE: All calculations for development intensities
shall be based on the gross area for each tract as
indicated on th q Zoning Exhibit.
I
I
ll
`g~ ♦ r~K`' ' l^' }"„r y / 4 d,y t'~ n 'J +yk4 a'F 1 i 1 , f
jj4t W1 , iYti V7 A V
41
(j
Ma 1
~t~r3Tio[~ ~
late homas are single family detached unite. '[boss units
fill conai,st of larger units and lots, having acces. and frontage
on a private or public road. Ownorship of theso homes would
include the unit as well as the late Typically, these units will
be one and two story structures,
PMAITTED USES s
a ,
Single family dwellings as outlined herein
PoIic or state accredited schools
' Churchr,s
' Accessory buildings and uses, customarily incident to the
a"%ve uses and located on the same lot therewith. No
"mporary buildings, mobile homes, travel trailers$ or
motor homes may be used for dwelling purposes within the
esta`ts home areas
Re'e1 estate sales offices during the development of the
residential subdivisions
' Temporary buildings for uses; incidental to construction
work on the premises, which buildings shall be removed
upon t.te completion or abandonment of construction work
' Fire and Public stations
Golf course and recreational facilities that are
compatible with the residential areas '
' Uses similar to the abovo mentioned uses, provided
activities conducted observe the requirements of all City
ordinancC3
' Such u3es as may tie permitf.ed by means of Specific Use
f Permits
f REOUI PJDQMS s
l~
C Height Requirnmontss No building shall exceed thirty-zix
{36) feet or two and one-half (2-1/2) stories in height,
Area Requirements '
is Front Yard - There shall be a front yard'having a
i ; required depth of not less than kwenty-five (25)
feets
}
a
X. 6 L ~ ~22 ty~ ~ ~ ~ br Y db .'yea 1.'sYY "k3 "e`v, .a
' ar,. 's a 83 ~i.
Side_ Yard There shall be a aide yard on each side
' Of the lot having a width of not less than seven and
gone-half (7-1/2) feet. A side yard adjacent to a
r street shall not be less than fifteen (15) feet
Rear Yard - There shall be a rear yard having a depth
of not less than twenty (20) feet.
'Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than nine-thousand, six-hundred (9,600)
eq~sare feet.
Lot Width - The average width of any lot shall not be
less than eighty (80) feet.
Lot Depth - The average depth of the lot shall not be
less than cne-hundred, twenty (120) feet, except that
a corner or cul-de-sac lot may have a depth of less
than one-hundred, twenty (120) feet provided that the
minimum depth is no less than one-hundred (100) feet.
Minimum Dwelling Size - The minimum floor area of any
dwell ng un t shall be one-thousand, eight-hundred
(1,800) square feet.
Lot Coverage - In no case shall more than forty (40)
percent of the total lot area be covered by the
combined area of the stain b+ji.ldings and ac,:-ssory
buildinoi.
Parking Requirements A minimum of two (2) off-street
' parking spaces sMA'1 be provided for each dwelling unit.
NOTE:
As a part of the above parking requirement, P. n
enclosed garage shall be provided for each dwelling
unit. This enclosed garage area shall be of
sufficient size to accomodate one car or a garage
space of at least twelve (12) by twenty (20) feet.
9uilding_Materialst All dwelling units shall be
constructed of masonry, stucco, or of a glass building
material of the kind usually used for outside wall
construction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent of the area of the outside walls.
Unit Distributions Percent of tract areas to be
desi~jr~ated for estate home uses are indicated on the
attached Zoning Exhibit.
a '
{
7
II
i
r
1
3 P~ u i. v' A^ ~ r-: T r 1~'nr 0. d,k ~ s iG e
~ '`~ie y. ~'t r~ $ exE ~ . t Y i r, ti ' ~-"t { r a t n •d
ti~ ~ r M f{ ,y
PATIO '
DEP IlTION t
Patio"'Homes are proposed as another form of single family
detached housing. These units are proposed as zero lot line
homes in which a unit is sited on one of the lot lines. This
concept provides a more efficient use of the lot, having three
yards instead of four, and therefore creates more useable yard
area. Ownership of these homes would involve the unit as well as
the lot. Typically, these units would be one and -two story
structures,
PERMITTED USES:
i
' Single family detached units as outlined herein
' all uses as permitted in the Cluster Home areas
REWI REMzNTS
a'
p` Hei'hL Re uirementas No building shall exceed thirty-
t- four? 4 feet or two (2) stories in height.
Area Reauirementso
k
Front Yard - There shall ba a front yard having a
required depth of not leas than twenty (20) feet.
Side-Yard - No side yard is required on one side of
the lot. A minimum separation of ten (10) feet is
required between structures.
Rear Yard - There shall be a rear
of not leas than ten (10) feet, yard having a depth
Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than three-thousand, six-hundred (3,600)
square feet.
Lot Width - The average width of any lot shall not be
less than forty (40) feet.
Lot Depth - The average depth of the lot shall not be
f.' less than ninety (90) feet, except that a corner or
cul-de-sac lot may have less depth provided that the
minimum depth is no less than eighty-five (85) feet.
Minimum Dwelling Size - The minimum floor area of any
dwelling unit shall be one-thousand, two-hundred,
fifty (1,250) square feet.
12
S ` k _ ` 1 u ~M1 V'1'~~ V .atiwri7~II f"Y~' SI'~} ryS~ :d` 4 { t' 1 ~l M„'~, yY' .:'l aY { 1 `
Y~~ I Y ~ a > x 1 C~4 t. T y A w. Iii y 2. 1 t j:
.hp ?Me~Y Poe LL'Y ~ ~ r i~ ~ t r:~ x ! Y _ T lta
}l~ r ~ I i rk d♦ F Y~ ~
` .ot-coverage - In no case shall more than sixty-five
65 percent of the total lot area be covered by the
'•Acombined area of the main buildings and accessory
%IYVbuildings.
' Parking Requirementst A minimum of two (2) off-street
parking spaces shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
NOTEi
s As a part of the above parking requirements, an
enclosed garage shall be provided for each dwelling
' unit. This enclosed garage area sliall be of
sufficient size to accomodate one car or a garage
't space of at least twelve (11) by twenty (20) feet.
Building _Materials: All dwelling units shall be
constructed of masonry, stucco, or of a glass building
material of the kind usually used for outside wall
construction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent of the area of the outside walls.
Residential Densitv3
Densit These residential areas will provide for a
maximum of 6.5 dwelling units per acre.
NOTEt All calculations for development intensities
shall be based on the gross area for each tract as
indicated on the Zoning Exhibit.
Y
G
4
rY _
L
P
' 13
Y
4 ~ "x { iZ N
,p ti~ t Hd"a , w Y:i' ! A u." Y c yy l 'zy r 5 .
MP
1 t ' TNO "~11La GARDEN HOMES
b~ltlN f TrON 2
Two Pamily Garden Homes are proposed as
attached units with party wail single family
Be They typically consist of two
(2) units per building. These areas are intended to accomodate
development •ahich is two family in character, but allows for
individual ownership of all dwelling units. Ownership of these
units would involve the unit and lot area. Typically, these
units will be one and two story structures.
PERMITTED USES:
Single family attached units a's outlined herein
All uses as permitted in the Patio Home areas
~QUISt
Hei'ht Re uirements: No building shall exceed thirty-
four4 feet or two (2) stories in height.
r 'IfArei! Reauirementse
s
k
.Front Yard - There shall be a front
yard depth of not less than twenty (20) feet.
Side Yard - No side yard is
the lot. A minimum separation uofetenn(10) feet is
required between structures.
Rear Yard - There shall be a rear yard having a depth
of not less than ten (10) feet.
Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
+ lot of less than three-thousand, six-hundred (30600)
square feet.
Lot Width - The average width of any lot shall not be
less than forty (40) feet.
Lot Depth - The average depth of the lot shall not be
T
cul-de sac lot ess than ninety (90) feet, except that a corner or
may
minimum depth is no h less less deighty five provided (85) fe t.e
t ''Minimum Dwellin size -
well ng un t sha f0beTone-thousand, one-hundred
(1,100) square feet,
In no case shall more than sixty-five
t6r-in -Cverag o
ercent of the total lot area be b the
bed area of the main buildings andra cessory
buildings.
14
8 ; Ah3 xd}:. ° 5 s" Fl' Y:f vY'i'GT v re t r
J 1 @!~ 5 } e' ~y, 7 6 1 d . } Ta,r4 i Af6C i t!
3n tr.1N ~ d L i.
71
spa king Requirements: A minimum of two (2) off-street
":wpaking spaces shall be provided for each dwelling unit,
NOTE:
As a part of, the above parking requirements, an
enclosed garage shall be provided for each dwelling
-unit. This enclosed g;%ra,ge area shall be of
sufficient size to accomodate one car or a garage
space of at least twelve (12) by twenty (20) feet.
8„ ildinq_Naterialst All dwelling units.shall be
constructed of masonry, stucco, or of a glass building
material of the kind usually used for outside wall
construction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent of the area of the outside walls.
r Residential Densityi
Density - These residential areas will provide f-)r a
r maximum of 6.5 dwelling units per acre.
NOM All calculations for development intensities
shall be based on the gross area for each tract as
F indicaed on the Zoning Exhibit.
x
r
M'
t
i
r
1
s
is
M
EE,"b SHOPPING
.,ice - 1 7 4
Neighborhood Shopping areas are primarily retail commercial
areas supplying the surrounding residential areas with
convenience goodLk and services which are normal everyday
i necessities and routine purchases.
These Commercial areas are intended to accomodate a unified
grouping, in one (1) or more buildings, of retail shops and
stores;;dnd personal services that provide for the regular needs
and are for the convenience of the people residing in the
adjacent residential neighborhoods,
PERMITTED USES:
' All uses as permitted in the Garden Office areas
NOTE: All lesser and different uses as permitted within
the Neighborhood Shopping areas shall be governed by the
requirements as set forth for that particular type of
use
Bakery (retail)
Bank
' Barber and beauty shops
' Convenience store
M ' Day care center
' Drug Store or pharmacy
' Dry cleaning and laundry
florist or garden shops (no outside storage or sales)
' Grocery store
' Hardware store
' Household appliance sales
.
Personal services
I ` 'Pet grooming and supplies
' Photo service
' Retail shops
' Savings and loan
R
Y
24
~ } xA ,
~5
na i i of a t`tr R r S tie `X,tiy A F {.x~*°Z& °~3' th.
~N, w+ r qM~w 3 M1 Nor ~~,x~.y r t; fw a F f. a x fi € > L' a.'` a }a~ yy~~rr 1 Y. 1r' _
tr 1~ ^i~ 'M, xry v j~ r ~ 1 t a. 1 4. P .'y)~ x§.'Fr>•` ~}s 3 Y K~ ~`w v
ro i
musics dance cr drama
Vie arinarian (no outside runs)
Uses similar to the above mentioned
f permitted
provided activities conducted observe the requirements eof
all City ordinances
Temporary buildings and uses incidental to construction
work on the premises, which shall be removed upon the
completion or abandonment of construction work
Such uses as may be permitted by means of Specific Use
Permits
REQUIRENENTS:
4AiSht Requirements: The maximum height for the main
building shall be two and one-half (2-1/2) stories, but
shall not exceed thirty-six (36) feet in height.
Area Requirements:
Front Yard - There shall be a minimum front ;ard of
r not less than twenty-five (25) feet.
Side Yard - There shall be a minimum side yard for
each s e of the lot or tract on which any single
building or building c*mplex is constructed of ten
(10) feet.
Rear Yard - There shall be a minimum rear yard of ten
feet.
Landsca ed 0 en Sa ce - F
lot area shall be maintained asrlandscaped topen
space.
Lot Coverage - In no case shall more than fifty (50)
percent of the total lot area be covered by the
a combined area of the main buildings and accessory
buildings.
Floor Area Ratios The ratio of total floor area of all
buildings to total land area shall be a meiximum of lil.
NOTES All calosilations for development intensities or
' maximum floo): areas shall be based on the gross area for
each tract ag+ indicated on the Zoning Exhibit.
8 i_lding Materialss The main building exteriors shall be
conttructed of glass, stone, brick, tiles, cement,
concrete, exterior wood (Maximum of 408) or similar
materials, or any combination thereof.
25
l
1
i7N v I 4j~-A^~
{ rt `MT ~ d 3Y4 ib-'r°s.S ° 'p it ~r. i 4 F +Ni T., n
f 4L ~n p r, } "11-107 7 a f i,Yu
~Pi. P 1J[*y p dt?+, a FK;.., t t
li king Requirements One (1) off-street parking space
r ~Sal3~d po`vIded or each two-hundred
`aq are feet of floor space used for retail trade.
a
c
r'
'I
a
,
N
3
i
.
r
1
j 26
M,+'~,xy ^'OF i YK~s yr ~~•~.?,s ~ t v 1r i :;r •~',s 7,
GbLi+"B6 1lND CLUB
DIVINITION s
ti
.Golf Course and Club areas are intended to accomodate all
facilities and uses associated with the proposed golf course and
associated golf club.
PERMITTED USES:
Golf course facilities
' Maintenance facilities
' Golf club facilities
Private club
' Restaurant
Fitness center
b 'J
Swimming facilities
Tennis facilities
Parking facilities
Private and public roadways
r
Accessory retail uses
Uses similar to the above mentioned permitted uses,
provided activities conducted observe the requirements of
all City ordinances
REQUIREMM S:
Height Re uirements: The maximum height for the main
buildings shall be two and one-half (2-1/2) stores, but
shall not exceed thirty-six (36) feet in height.
Area R _e Quirements: Minimum yard requirements, lot
coverage, and floor area ratios are not applicable to
this area.
Building Materials: The main building exteriors shall be
Gd constructed of glass, stone, brick, tiles, cement,
concrete, exterior wood (Maximum of 40%) or similar
materials or any cdmbination thereof.
33
r
r+,~r~^f iy•"r~s-;a' ~'~~P~"JIS' r+F ' J~LCtr r R rr.~r 'Y 'e Yid "t,(~~\ ~ 4 rK"r r i4 7 Ye ~y q r;t ..Vy } ~
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1706
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received None Received
"NI
.
C/
-loo
G
)l wdt"
41
tAil
~G /1, 0 Al /~Q 1 _
i
i
P i Z Minutes
December 12, 1984
Page 8
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
3. :hat a traffic impact study will be done within a
reasonable period of time, transportation engineer
to determine what reasonable period of time will be.
Stconded by Mr. Pearson and carried 6-1. Mr. Escue
voted no stating that he in primarily opposed to
concentration of commercial along 1-35E.
C.r;-1706. This is the petition of Myers Development
Corporation requesting the establishment of planned
development (PD) toning on a 131.7 acre tract of land
located on the east side of Nowlin Road approximately
2,200 feet south of Robinson Road. If approved, the
planned development will permit the following land uses
Multi-Family - approximately 221 units on 12.3 acres
with a density of 18 units per acre
Cluster Homes - approximately 252 units on 42 acres
with a density of 6 units per acts
Neighborhood shopping - 2.6 acres
Single Family - approximately 6 units on 2.1 acres
with a density of 3 units per acre
Patio Homes - approximately 82 units on 12.6 acres
with a density of 6.5 units per acre
Estate Hones - approximately 45 unite on 15.1 acres
with a density of 3 units per acre
Two Family Garden Homes - approximately 60 units on
9.2 acres with a density of 6.5 units per acre
Golf Course - approximately 34.4 acres
Ms. Spivey stated that two notices were mailed to prop-
erty owners; no reply forms were returned in favor or
in opposition.
Craig Curry, land planner for the project, outlined
areas showing different types of residential ii es au
wall as golf course portion (31.5 acres) located within
area proposed for annexation by City of Denton. 4e said
estate type homes would surround the golf course. Apart-
ments/condominiums would be located behind the neighbor-
hood service area at corner of the county road and Lake
Sharon Drive.
No one spoke in opposition to the request.
Me. Spivey stated that proposed golf course provides
open space; development provides diversified housing
types and conforms to standards for a moderate intensity
area. Staff recommends approval with condition that
development conform to proposal by developer with
exception of parking ratio for neighborhood service
areas should be 11201) instead of 11250 as shown,
Petitioner offered no rebuttal,
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of 2-1706 subject
to tha following conditions
That permitted land uses in each toning classifica-
tion, ^etbacks, height linit., lot coverage, floor
area ratios, let widths, lot depths, lot areas and
parking requirements will conform to the standard*
4Y e j ` ' .F+ .X 1 PI 71
c+.y +
r^ ~
S
,P L Z Minutes
December 12, 1984
Page 9
as proposed by developer with exception of parking
ratio in neighborhood service area to be 1e200 rather
than 1230.
~.xconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (7-0).
D. Z-1713. This is the pekitinn of Gunter Knight for
knight and Miller ldevelopers) requesting a change
in the current coning classification from Agricultural
(A) to Light Industrial (LI) on a tract of 1.530 acres
situated south o: U. S. Highway 380 and commencing
approximately 1,140 feet east of Masch Branch Road
and shown on William Bryan Survey, Abstract 1148,
Denton County.
Mr. Persiud stated that notices were mailed to seven
property ownersr no reply forms were returned in favor
or in opposition.
Gunther Knight, petitioner, stated that he is a partner
and the purpose of requesting light industrial toning
is to develop property with metal buildings for office/
warehouse type operation.
Mr. Persaur4 continued staff report stating that proposed
change is consistent with the Denton Development Guide
policiest that property is in a moderate intensity area
which could accommodate approximately 96 acres of light
industrial development, that most of the area is cur-
rently coned agricultural and relatively undeveloped at
this time. He stated it is near Denton Municipal Airport
and falls within cone it - zone of miniaal effect within
the range of 90-:00 CNR (composite noise rating)t that
light industrial development is permitted within this
zone and sound control me;.sures can be considered in
bl;ilding design. Property is located approximately
',700 feet north of northern extremity of the runway,
maximum building height allowed under airport zoning
ordinance would be 108 feet.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to request.
Petitioner offered no rebuttal.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Ms, Cole moved to recor,mend approval of Z-1713 with the
following provisions contained in the Municipal Airport
Zoning Ordinance 10rder 81-1)1
1. That building height shall not exceed 108 feet.
2. That the provisions of Sections 5 and 7 of the
Municipal Airport Ordinance shall be applicable
to the future development and use of the site.
3. That the owner of the land, buildings and appurte-
nances will allow the City Manager to install,
operate and maintain at the expeh.e of the City of
Denton such workings and lighting eixtures as may
be necessary.
Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried (7-0).
w .
DATBi 02/19/65
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO,. Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE Z-1709
RBf.'OMWDAT ION :
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1709 at its meeting
on November 28, 1984 and voted 1-0 to recommend approval subject to
applicable provisions contained in the Municipal Airport Zoning
Regulations (Order 81-1).
SUMMARY:
This is a tract of 5.00 acres situated west of Masch Branch Road and
north of US Hwy 380.
MlCKGROUND:
The site is located in a low intensity area which allows development
of up to 2,600 intensity units within a half a mile. Since the site
is within the approach tone to the Airport, the provisions contained
in the Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations will apply to
development.
PROGRAMS,-DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
7ISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable
Resp,,.tfull eubmitte
•
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Harry N. Persaud r
Development Review Planner
AP roved:
Jeff e
Direct 0 la king
and Community Developaent
0952a
~ iy~ SPA
pPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1709 Meeting Date: February 1Q, 1984
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Burke Engineering
For Tri-Steel Structures
1400 Cresent, Denton, Tx. 76201
Status of Applicant: Owner - Developer
Requested Action: Establish zoning as Office District
(0) classification.
Location and Size: A tract of 5,00 acres situated vest
of and abutting Masch Branch Road and
North of US Hwy 380 (University
Drive) and being outside of the City
Limits. Annexation procedures are
pending.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Vacant, Agriculture (A)
South - Vacant, Agriculture (A)
East - Vacant, Agriculture (A)
West - Vacant, Agriculture (A)
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: The western part of the site falls
within the flood plain, FEMA
regulations will be applicable to
drainage improvements,
(Case M Z-1709)
Page Two
SPECIAL. INFORMATION (Continued)
Transpottation: The site abuts Masch Branch Road
recommended for 60 foot right-of-way
width (collector street) which
connects to US Hwy 380 (University
Drive).
Utilities: There is need for a 121' diameter
water line and a 10" diameter
sanitary sewer line to be extended
across the frontage of the property
and connect to existing facilities at
Ranch Estates (approximately 1,680
feet).
The required water flow for fire
protection is 1,500 GPM, and 2,477
GPM is available. Fire hydrants will
be required every 300 feet.
Telephone and electric services are
available.
111 ANALYSIS
The use and development of this site will need to satisfy the
requirements of the Denton Development Guide and the Denton
Municipal Airport Ordinance. (Order 81-1)
According to the Development Guide this site falls within a low
intensity area. The primary purpose of a low intensity area is
to provide for ovarall land use/transportation balance by
controlling the density and intensity to 75 trips/day/gross
acre. Development in these areas, therefore, emphasize
residential uses. At the same time, however, diversification of
land uses is encouraged but limited to the following conditions:
1. Strict site plan control within one block of existing low
density residential areas (development should maintain
character of area, architectural, landscaping, etc.) At
this time, there is no low density housing within one block
of the site.
2. Traffic planning insures access by collector street or
larger and not through local low density streete. The site
abuts Masch Branch Road which is recommended,to be developed
with a 60 foot right-of-way width (collector street), which
connects to US Hwy. 380 a primary mayor arterial,
r .y d 7 E. ti .T.
ter. .
(Case # Z-1709)
Page Three
ANALYSIS CONT.
3. The overall density/intensity standard not violated. Most
of the land in this low intensity area is currently zoned
agriculture (A). Even So office development on this site
will generate a moderate 1,750 intensity unit.
4. Sufficient green space. recreational facilities and
diversity of parks are provided. This condition is not
E applicable to office zoning.
The Development Guide also restricts office/retail type of
development to 4 acres or 2600 intensity units. The limit of 4
acres applies directly to retail uses which generate 650 t/d/ac
yielding an intensity unit of 2,600 t/d/ac. Office development,
however, will generate 350 t/d/ac which in this case will result
in an intensity unit of 1750 t/d/ac. The proposed office
district (0) classification of this site is, therefore,
compatible with the policies of the Denton Development Guide.
The site is located within the "Controlled aceall as defined by
the Airport Zoning Act and the use and de~,elopment of land in
this area is regulated by the Denton Municipal Airport Zoning
Ordinanco. (Order 81-1)
In this zoninol framework the site is located in zone M I-zone of
minimal effect within the range of 90-100 CNH. (Composite Noise
Rating is an accepted methodology for accessing the severity of
noise imj~act). Office development is permitted within this zone
and sount control measures gray be considered in building design.
The site is within the appcoach zone of the Airport and it is
situated approximately 8,500 feet north of northern extremity
of the runway and in line with the extended runway center line.
Section 4 of .he Municipal Airport Zoning ordinance limits the
height of buildings to one foot for every 50 feet of horizontal
distance. Considering that the site is 15 feet higher in
i elevation than the runway, the maximum building height to be
allowed on the site is 155 feet. Section 7 of the ordinance
would also be applicable to the use and development of the site
in the future.
01
(Case $ Z-1709)
Page Four
ANALYSIS CONT.
Charles Willis and Associates, a consulting firm, will commence
a study shortly along with City staff to prepare an Airport
Mastir plan for the Denton Municipal Airport. At a meeting on
November 2, 1984 with City staff and the consultant, it was
agreed to limit the height of buildings on this site to not more
than two stories.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1709 at its
meeting on November 28, 1984 and voted 7-0 to recoumend approval
subject to the following applicable provisions contained in the
Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations (Ord. 81-1).
1. That buildings on the site shall not exceed two stories of
building height.
2. That the provisions contained in Section 5 of the Municipal
Airport Zoning Ordinance (Order 81-1) is applicable to the
future development and use of the site.
3. That the owner of the site and/or buildings and
appurtenances in question will allow the City Manager to
install, operate, and maintain at the expense of the City of
Denton such markings and lights as may be necessary.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Deny petition
2. Approve without conditions
3. Approve with additional conditions }
ATTACHMENT
1. Location map
2. Reply form totals
3. Property owner list
4. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
November 38, 1984 i
0952a i
17! V,
'f
•.a Y r
i
'ate y
D 04
A r •
O C
M
ti
ti
IN
a
11 \14 Ir ~18 9
MASCH BRANCH RO D~'
N
tf I
M•~~ aw. .y
040-
i
i
rT p"t M ~tii _~j g. wit' u F'J `';t ~v,'•,e e.:u
i
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
2-1709
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
John F. Brown None Received
Route 1, Box 362E
Denton, TX
307-7823
I
I
75047
►IP
14A )A I.
dA&iaj ~ -
k I,
LL gal. 4uri.,M/j
9L 7
514.
,
7z
y,
W ~lv J` 1 i ,C x,
P b Z Minutes
November 26, 1981.
Page 2
III. Public Hearings
r
A. f Z-1709. This is the petition of Burke Engineering,
representing 'Tri-Steel Structures, requesting the
estabiist=ent of office (0) district zoning classifi-
cation on a tract of five t,5) acres of land situated
west of and abutting Masch Branch Road and north of
U. S. Highway 380 and more fully described as lot 11
block 1, Tri-Steal Headquarters Addition. This tract
is currently outside the Limits of the City of Denton
and annexation procedures have been initiated and in
progress. If approved, the site may be used for any
type of development permitted in an office district by
the Denton Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Persaud stated there were seven reply forma mailed
to property owners; one was in opposition and one
undecided.
Brian Burke stated re is representing Tri-Steel
Structures, Inc., who is a Denton based operation; they
are requesting rezoning and annexation of this site as
it will be their office site.
On question from Mr. Ellison, Mr. Burke answered,
building tieight is anticipated to be two stories or
less as per our understanding of tue conditions in the
airport area.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Hr. Persaud stated according to the Development Guide
this site fails within a low itensity area. He stated
this development will need to satisfy the requirements
of the Denton Municipal Airport Ordinance (Order bl-1).
He stated diversification of land use is encouraged but
limited to certain conditions. He described the site
and stated it is located within the "controlled area"
as defined by the Airport Zoning Act.
He added the site is witnln the approach zncse of the
airport and it is situated approximately 8.500 feet
north of the northern extra +ity of the runway and in
line with the extended runway center line. He stated
Section IV of the Municipal Airport Zoning Ordinance
lisits the haient of buildis:;ts Lo one foot for every i0
feet of horizontal distance. Considering tnat thu site
is 15 feet higher in elevation than the runwayy the
naximum height to be allowed on the site is lii feet.
Section VII of the ordinance wou?,d also be applicable to
the use and development of the site in the future. He
stated staff recommends approval of L-1709 with condi-
tions.
Mr. Morris stated staff is not really imposing condi-
tions, as they are applicable to the Airp(Irt Boning
Ordinance.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1709
with the following conditions:
1) That buildings on the site shall be subject to
height limitations contained in Section IV of the
Municipal Airport Ordinance (81.1).
A 5 1
P S 'L Minutes
November 28, 1984
Page 3
2) That the provisions contained in section V of the
Municipal Airport Zoning Ordinance (Order 61-1) is
applicable to the future development ano use of the
site.
3) That the owner of the site and/or buildings and
appurtenances in question will allow the City
Manager to install, operate, and maintain at the
expense of the City of Denton such markings and
lights as may be necessary.
Seconded by Mr. LaForte dnd unanimously carried (7-0).
B. Z-1711. This is the petition of Dale Irwin requesting a
c ange in zoning from the single family (SF-7) classi I-
cation to the multi-family (MF-1) district at 601, 615,
701 and 705 Malone Street. The property is more particu-
larly described as lots 1 and 2, block 2, of the Wright
Addition.
Ms. Spivey stated there were 38 reply forms mailed to
property owners; 10 were returned in favor and live in
opposition.
Mr. Dale Irwin stated for clarification, this petition
involves four individually owned lots, and his name was
on the petition merely to save filing fees. He gave the
names of the owners of the othar lots and the sizes of
the lots and added he feels trey are adequate to serve
10 to 12 apartments per lot; and would beat serve in
that way as o?;osed to rent property with older nooses
built in the late 20 s and early 30 s. He described the
surroundingg land uses and stated most is rent property.
He quoted Mr. Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and
Community Development Department, as speaking to the
Apartment Association, Rile need more apartments in
Denton." Mr. Irwin continued, not everyone wants to
live in the Teasley Lane area. The property in question
we feel, could better be served to allow more people to
live here. Host of the property owners in the area are
in favor of the petiton.
On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Irwin saswered 10
to 12 apartments could be built on each lot.
Hs. Hall, owner of one of the lots, stated she is
e progressive and optimistic person and she is for
progression in Denton. She stated she has lived in
Denton for 35 years and would like to see this neigh-
borhood upgraded. She stated she feels this would be
a step in the right direction as this is a substandard
neighborhood. She stated she hem spent a great deal
of money to keep her property upgraded.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Ms. Hall answered yes,
eventually, she would like to see it to•n down.
Mr. Ted Palmore, owner of lots 3 and 4, stated he has
owned these lots for four years. He stated there is a
lot of commercial property surrounding tnis property.
He stated he would like to upgrade the area as he also
feels there is a lot of substandard housing in the
area. He stated he has spent $10,000 plus to level,
rewire replumb and reroof his house. He stated the
house is uninsulated and has 3 X S foot windows all the
way around the house, which was built in 1911. He
stated he feels it would be better to start all over
again with something new.
Y ; DATE: 02/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO- Mayor and Members of the City Council
:7ROMt G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECTt PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CASE Z-1712
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at it's
meeting of January 2, 1985 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1712
by a vote of 5-1.
SUMMARY:
This is a request for a change from the agricultural (A) district to
the light industrial (LI) classification on a 111.7 acre tract
orated adjacent and north of Westgate Hoerital approximately 600
:eet west of the I-35N service road.
BACKGROUNDt
The tract is located in both a moderate and high area which allows
for flexibility of land use and little control of intensity. Due to
surrounding light industrial/commercial Eoning and land use, it is
unlikely that low density development will occur at this site.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GPOUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund
Respec,~'ul Lsubm;fe ,~t
0. Chi-is Hartung
City Manager
Prepared byt
i
Denise Sp ey
Development Review Planner
Ap %V&44.0(4,
Jeff e
Director of Planning
and Community Development 0663a
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1712 Meeting Date: February 19, 1985
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Walter DeRonde
523 North Locust
Denton, TX 76201
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in zoning from agricultural (A)
district to the light industrial (LI)
classification
Purpose: Unknown
Location and Size: A 111.7 acre tract located in the
R. Whitlock Survey, Abstract 1403, and
the B.B.B. and the C.R.R. Co. Survey,
Abstract 141. The site is more par-
ticularly described as being adjacent
and north of Westgate Hospital approxi-
mately 601 feet west of the Interstate
Highway 35N service road.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Vacant single family house;
outside city limits, LI
South - Westgate Hospital and Treatment
Center; LI
East - Vacant; LI, A
West - Vacant, agricultural; outside
city limits
Denton Development Guides Area is located in both moderate and
high intensity areas.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: Drainage is a concern on the western
edge of this tract. Detention is
recommended and other drainage
Improvements contained in the master
drainage plan may be required.
(Case Z-1712)
Page l
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
Transportations The tract is just south of proposed
Loop 288 western extension but actual
alignment has not been approved. The
Thoroughfare Plan shows a collector
street running through the middle of
this tract. Sidewalks will be
required along all collector sized or
larger streets.
Utilities: A number of developments are currently
requesting sewer service in this
area. It rtay be necessary to run a
line parallel to the existing 8" on
I-35N from this development to the 12"
section of the Hickory Creek sewer
line approximately 8000' away. An B"
water line in I-35N may have to be
upgraded to provide adequate fire flow
to this development.
ANALYSIS
This tract is located in both a moderate and a high area. Major
activity centers are designed to be the major commercial and
employment centers of the City. The northern portion of the
property is located in the I-35E and North Loop 288 center which
emphasizes a balance between commercial and industrial uses.
Little or no control of intensity is proposed in hiqh activity
areas. The southern portion of the tract is contained in a
moderate area which is under the intensity standard for the
area. Moderate centers allow for a flexibility of land use.
The zoning surrounding this tract is light industrial (LI) to the
north, east and south. A portion of this tract already in the
city limits has frontage on I-35 and 15 zoned light industrial
(LI). The site is bordered on the west by the A.T.& S.F. Rail-
road. A variety of land uses including a hospital, medical
offices, motels and restaurants are located in the immediate
vicinity. The City of Denton Thoroughfare Plan shows that the
northern extension of Loop 288 will pass a short distance to the
north of this site. It is unlikely that single family develop-
ment will occur here due to surrounding land uses and zoning. RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1712
by a vote of 5-1.
(Case Z-1712)
Page 3
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Map
2. Reply forms total
3. Property owner list
4. Planning and zoning Commission minutes of the meeting of
January 21 1985
0579;1
it
& - C F:~; tlL, a y yr, r ~ t Fmi p ~ ~ .ti ~ e,.,,q,:
a c
Z-1712
1
I
1 4 .~_I
,
i
' I 1 I
ISf •16.1
I
~ j l 1
I ~
I I
1
E3~4q
t LL
it 1 ti t,c.{ - Vl
' I 1
i
1 G R
I
-13
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1712
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Roger Hull None Received
Route 1, Box 430A
Denton, TX
I ~1
' t - 1 r i
dZI
Aw,
I G/~♦~J
42
t ~
7 ,
i
(e AL
Jy~f?1lYn~
n v
I
aq
7: 4
y
P i Z Minutes
January 2, 1985
Page 3
1. Relationship to other distiACtive buildings, sites
or areas which are eligible for preservation accord-
iny to a plan based on architectural, historic or
cultural motif.
2. Exemplification of the cultural, economic, social,
ethnic or historical heritage cf the city, state
or United States.
3. Identification with a person or persons who
significantly contributed to the culture and
development of the city, state or United States.
4. A building or structure that because of its loca-
tion has become of value to a neighborhood, com-
munity area ur the city.
:ors. Berg stated that she agrees with staff's statements.
Oer feeling is that other old buildings should not be
torn down, that in order to preserve downtown it is
necessary to remodel. She said she wants to preserve
her children's heritage, she wants them to see old
buildings.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte moved to recommend approval of H-34 stating
that he agrees with Mr. Miller that building is not like
it was but feels that approval is justified. He quoted
from ordinance which defines historic landmark as any
building, etc, which the City Council determines shall
be protected, enhanced and preserved in the interest of
the people. Seconded by Mr. Sidor.
Chairman said in this particular case ne feels there is
some justification for designation, that the original
tin ceiling and brick walls nave been retained. He said
he agrees with Mr. LaPorte.
Vote was called and motion carried (5-1). Mr. Pearson
voted no.
3.1 -1712. This is the petition of halter DeRonde
requesting the establishment of light industrial (LI)
zoning on a 111.7 acre tract in the 3.B.8. and C.R.R.
Company Survey, Abstract 141, and the R. Whitlock
Survey, Abstract 1403. The tract is located north of
Westgate Hospital and Medical Center, approximately
600 feet west of the interstate Highway 35 north service
road, and adjacent and east of the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Pe Railroad. Annexation procedures are currently
underway on this tract.
Ms. Spivey said that eight notices were mailed to
property owneral no reply forms were received in
favgr or in opposition.
Charles Watkins, representing the petitioner, stated
that this 111 acre tract abuts current city limits= that
annexation and light industrial zoning is requested. He
said that Mr. DeRonde owns the majority of the land, that
two other owngra have joined him in the request. He said
light industrial exists to north, south and east of this
tract, that railroad is located to west. He said rail-
road is located above ground level and is the logical
stopping point for industrial zoning. Westgate Hospital
is located to the r)uth and the nearest concentration of
residential is Ranch Estates. He said they feel the
site has potential for a variety of land uses and they
feel light industrial zoning io appropriate because of
the location on the railroad and 1-35.
0.:: y e Y 1.-.•. w. 4
a
P Z Minutes
January 2, 1985
Page 4
No one spoke in opposition to request.
Ms. Spivey continued staff report stating that property
is located in both a moderate and a high intensity areal
that northern portion of property is located in thw I-35E
and North Loop 288 center and southern portion is located
in a moderate area which is under the intensity standard
for the area. She said that Denton Thoroughfare Plan
shows that_ the northern extension of Loop 288 will pass
just north of this site. Staff feels request is compat-
ible and recommends approval.
On question, Mr. Clark said that drainage concerns and
location of streets and sidewalks would be handled dur-
ing the platting stage.
Petitioner offered no rebuttal.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Chairman stated that he has no objection to light indus-
trial but he does have a problem with an ordinance that
permits multi-family housing in light industrial areas.
He said he opposes light industrial zoning and would
prefer a PD.
Mr. Pearson commented that he supports idea of petitioner
that they would support more than one type of land use.
He said ne feels that if developer puts multi-family
units next to light industrial, it would be developer's
concern. He said he thinks light industrial zoning
would oe best use of property.
Mr. Sidor agreed with Mr. Pearson and said he feels
light industrial zoning would be appropriate.
Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of Z-1712.
Seconded by Mr. Peason and carried (5-11.
Mr. Claiborne voted no.
C. Z-1716. This is the petition of Melvin Gouge (realtor),
representing Lela Sparkman (owner), requesting a change
in the current zoning classification from agricultural
(A) to office (0) on a tract of 2.5 acres situated south
of and abutting U. S. Highway 380, east of Egan Road,
and being the most southern portion in the southwest
corner of the Thomas Egan Survey, Abstract 0406. If
approved, the said tract of land ma, be used for any of
the purposes permitted In the zoning ordinance of the
City of Denton.
Mr. Persaud seii that one notice was mailed to prop-
erty owner, no reply forms were received in favor or
in cp>osition.
Melvin Gouge, builder, stated he is requesting change to
office zoning in order to build a small one story office
building for Dc. Thacker, tnat packing will be provided.
No one spoke in opposition to request,
Mr. Persaud continued staff report stating that property
is apparently located within flood plain or floodway,
that an engineering study during platting process will
determine finisned floor elevation of building. He said
the area is located within a moderate a:tivity center
which is largely undaveloped and zoned agricultural, that
proposed use will generate approximately 875 total inten-
-Jity trips. The Development Guide allows for flexibility
L
DATg: 02hMs
x CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO% Mayor and Members of the City Council 9
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, Cttj Manager
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE Z-1715
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission considered Z-1715 at its meeting
on January 30, 1985 and voted 5-1 to recommend approval even though
this PD violates major policies of the Denton Development Guide.
SUMMARY:
This is a tract of 37.6 acres situated west of and abutting Loop 288
and north of and abutting Audra Lane.
BACKGROUND:
The site is located in a low intensity area. The proposals to use
and develop land in this PD are not consistent with the Denton
Development Guide.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMBNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable
Respectfully ubmitted
s
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Harry P laud
Development Review Planner
Appro ed:
Jeff Meyer
,Diiector_ of ,Planning-,
and Community Development
0623]
I
PLAKIN' ii%0 AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1715 Meeting Date: February 19, 1985
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Charles Watkins
representing
Don Richards of Strata Properties
P.O. Sox 828
i Denton. TX 76202
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in the current zoning
classification from agricultural (A)
to planned development (PD). If
approved the PD will permit the
following uses:
1. 10.7 acres of two family (2F)
with a density of 11.2 units per
acre. ,
2. 9.8 acres cif multi-family
development with a density of 20
units per acre.
3. 4.1 acres of warehouses.
4. 6.7 acres of retail/office/
showroom. f
5. 4.4 acres of office/warehouse.
tLocatton and Size: This is a tract of 37.6 acres
situated west of and abutting Loop
288 and north of and abutting Audra
Lane.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
1 and Zoning: Nort« - Commercial (C)
South - Vacant, (C)
East - Vacant. (C)
West Single family: (SF-7);
Vacant; (PD-64)
Denton Development Guide- Site is located within a low
intensity area.
(Case N 2-1715)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: A memorandum from the City Engineer
is attached.
Public Utilities: There is a 1611 water line along U.S.
Hwy 380. A water line will need to
be extended from this site to connect
i to the 16" line. The existing 8"
sanitary sewer line along Loop 288
and Audra will provide adequate sewer
capacity.
Transportation: Loop 288 is a primary major arterial.
Audta is a collector street requiring
60' right-of-way and perimeter street
improvements including sidewalks.
ANALYSIS
The proposals to use and develop land as shown in this planned
development district are not consistent with the policies of the
Denton Development Guide.
Intensity ritandards
The site is located in a low intensity area which can absorb up
to 2,300 intensity trips to meet its planned capacity based on
existing zoning. The proposed development will generate
approximately 9,050 intensity trips which is more than three
times the average standard allocation considering 75 t/d/ac. for
low intensity areas. If this PD is approved the intensity area
will exceed its planned capacity (58,125 trips) by 6,750 trips
or 11.6%. This excess should be considered in view of the fact
that there is approximately 313 acres of land under the
agricultural (A) classification which may require appropriate
zoning some time in the future.
L
f ti• tl
(Case M Z-1715)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
The Development Guide strongly recommends that the intensity
index is part of the priority policies and its importance cannot
be over emphasized. The general objective is to ensure overall
area land use/transportation balance by controlling the overall i
density and intensity to 75 t/d/ac.
Apartment Concentration in Low Intensity Ar6as
Another policy of the Development Guide Cor low intensity areas
is to encourage diversified land uses but to discourage con-
centrations except for low density residential and small
scattered sites of apartments. The Guide recommends as a
specific standard that concentration of apartments be strictly
limited to 200 units in low intensity areas. The Guide further
provides for a separation of apartment concentration by half a
mile linear distance or 50% of intensity area length. In this
case the site to the south and within half a mile of this tract f
is vacant and currently zoned commercial. This PD proposal
includes 316 units of multi-family and two family apartments in
one location which exceeds the concentration standards for low
intensity areas.
Concentration of Neighborhood Commercial/office, etc.
i
The Development Guide policies allow for diversity of land uses
in low intensity areas. The Guide recommends specific con-
centration standards for neighborhood commercial and office type
11 development to be limited to 4 acres or 2.600 intensity units.
Again concentration must be separated from other high intensity
retail/offics) and similar land uses by half a mile or 50% of
intensity area length. The PD proposal provides for over 11
acres of high intensity uses including retail/office and show-
room with a potential generation of 7.215 trips which is far in
excess of the concentration standards. This excess must be
considered in view of current commercial zoning classification
within half a mile of this site.
Strip Commercial Aiona Maior Thoroughfares
The Development Guide provides for a network of planned major
primary and secondary arterial roads intricately connecting high
and moderate intensity centers. The primary objective is to
realize a transportation system which would respond to our
current needs and contribute towards the long range land use/
transportation plan for the city.
(Case 0 Z-1715)
Page Four
ANALYSIS (continued)
Strip commercial development along our major thoroughfares would
adversely affect the flow of traffic and result in gross
inefficiency in the operation of the City's transportation
system. Strip commercial development has been expanding at
least by current zoning classification, at the Loop 288 and U.S.
Hwy 380 intersection. East of this tract, on the east side of
Loop 288 there is a commercial strip of over 2,200 feet under
current zoning classification. South of this tract and abutting
Loop 288 on the west side, there is another 1,000 feet of strip
commercial with existing use rights. It is evident that the
application of the strip commercial policy in this area has beer
neglected for some time and it is recommenled that we strongly
consider the increasing negative impacts which will result in
the future.
REC7MMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning commission considered Z-1715 at its
meeting on January 30, 1985 and voted 5-1 to recommend approval
even though this proposal violates major policies of the Denton
Development Guide. The Commission directed its attention to the
view that the site could not be adequately utilized for low
density housing.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Deny petition
2. Approve petition with or without conditions j
3. Request amends' PD
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map
2. Site plan
3. Memorandum from City Engineer
4. Reply form totals
S. Property owner list
6 Minutes of Planning and Zoning commission meeting of
January 30, 1985
Oo23)
J; L v 6.~~ S Ve. Vti. r~ r C
RP,
4•
Yf I~j~ Al
S~!f,- ~a ra. Xr .rk~ 1 } ti 7 ~ 77 b { i. + ~ ~~h t'~~s •K " 7''~ r=.
' i ~rh` ~b.M 1 " ~ ~1J r i>, ~ ~ A 5 a 7` ~t r C ~ r ,
rr
r,
\ 8.4
1 ,
'NIA •t P
r
A , ~ fit rr
A ~
' A
\ l
dmw
r •
PD-64
C
_ i S,co ; SF•10
1r r . M a-i:ru- -`r -r S-126
P0ft 73
PD - B &I
LI
- 46,
i
I
i l v , n.•i i. ra, telrw wbl. ,ilr Jl mrw.,`♦1 :m rrq t {
\1``t0 1
10.4
°1olk1:
► is
cmzz
Iv.l
yi•.9w
\ ~„irk il. l \Yi I.a♦\~w4 Y
l I \
s _
w. I1t~ La l7•. YNI .r M_ 1G::M iiq .y VI.. ♦ .1 .
/4 1 l
r I
\ 1. i ~ r KI' M I +n' Vr\..
:f r
AAA Ar ALONE
w J
.
,
'I
.
i
Y i, • f r~_. ~.JJ' IItf4 JOffKC I.
1 ~t ~4 1 I~at oIYQOOM I I - , . I 14110 USC tflll
Sy
Il '
C
L_. 7 ' I 1. ,J I J I 41 ,111 .r
1' 7 W lI11
♦ f f lONC r - 1y 1 VVV 1444
ANAL
~ ye1l...„ a~ ~ f
I
• , ' i S tl N , fnwc MA
~04/[N710N AI ~A~ ~i~ { `i R \ IONGtIOttoM 21/11K. A 71!
J / 1 % (1 !7 A90 R
1 r i
L. _ ` l.,_ P1,f fOWty of wVfON. i(LLf
R ,lo►tA
rap.
-
r R
41St lOWlt
~ ;4sJON,rA wta _ _
IONGfolr tvw wltvty 4O31I
\ I r .t y,,~~ .yam:
n 1
~~IRLMI, t;! Afr fl l1/K7it~. 1~.
14~Ii,rI ~MMi ~rMMMrIM~ .Mt f.l..
M~wKM ~ 1..._ .
r
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELLPHONE (817) 566.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 22, 1985
TO: !harry Persaud
FROM: Jerry C1ar1v7(~1t--
RE: 2-1715 ~J
The tract is located in an area that will require some major
public improvements. Loop 288 is being widened and access
roads added where it is going over Highway 380 in an overpass.
Please review the District 18 plans to see how this effects
this tract. Audra Lane is a collector (60'row) that will need
perimeter street paving along its frontage. The site plan
seems to show that no public roads will be used for access to
the mult-ifamily, office warehouse, retail showroom, and
warehouse tracts. No collectors are shown on the thoroughfare
map but are required for access to the above uses. Howevor,
all but the warehouse tract (4.1 acres) front along Audra
Lane. Loop 288 will have controlled access and the floodway is
between that tract and Loop 288. Also, most of the 4.1 acre
tract seems to be in the existing floodway.
Floodway and floodplain greatly effect this tract. The
developer plans to use detention which is strongly recommended
by the City. Examples of charnel and sturcr sewer improvements
needed in the area are shown on Master Drainage Plan Sheet Jb.
The developer should present his storm water management plan to
the City at an early date.
Sidewalks will be required along Audra Lane and Loop 288.
Also, any collectors added internally wuuld have to nave
sidewalks.
0272E
Ti
r,"r. fit` 4
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1715
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
S`. W. Gassaway None Received
P. 0. Box 637
Denton, TX
382-6160
Ralph L. Nations
2718 East University
Denton, TX
387-7245
low
10 764 31
AA r
13:
d
i
AM A~ AL
41.
Jon
,4I
JT~~-
. y.
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 30, 1985
A ,pecial called meeting of the Planning and 'Coning Commission of
tt.e City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, January 30, 1965,
ac 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Ruby Cole, R.B. Escue, Jr., Cary Juren, Robert LeForte,
Thomas Pearson and Andy Sidor
Absent: Bill Claiborne
Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey,
Development Review Planner; Harry Persaud, Development
Review Planner; Cecile Carson, Development Review Plan-
ner; Joe Morris, Acting City Attorney; Jerry Clark, City
Engineer; Koorosh Olyai, Transportation Engineer; Dave Ham,
Assistant Director of Utilities, Water/Wastewater Division;
Ray Rumfield, Civil Engineer; and Debbie Boydston, secretary.
Vice-Chairman Escue called the meeting to order.
1. Minutes
A. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of
December 12, 1984.
Mr. Juren made a motion to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of December 12, 1985. Seconded by Hr.
Pearson and unanimously carried (6-0).
B. Approval of the minutes of the special called meeting
of January 16, 1985.
Mr. Juren oxide s motion to approve the minutes of the
special caliui meeting of January 16 1985. Seconded
by Ms. Cole and uanimously carried (8-0).
Il. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the staff and approval
thereof will be strictly on the basis of the staff recom-
mendation. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the
Director of Planning and Community Development or his desig-
nee to proceed with each item in accordance with the staff
recommendation.
A. Recommend approval of preliminary repplat of the
Owsley Park Addition, Block 2, Lot 12A.
B. Approval of final plat of the Alvin and Ctarlotte Whaley
Addition.
Hr. LaForte made a motion to approve the Consent
Agenda. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried
(b-0).
III. Public Hearings
A f'jZL- This is the petition of Charles Watkins,
representing the owners, -equesting a change in tie
current zoning classification from agricultural (A)
to the planned development (PD) district: on a tract
of approximately 37.6 acres situated west of and
shutting Loon 298 and north of and abutting Audra Lane
ani more fully described in the R. S. LonBbottom Survey,
Abstract IA-775. tf approved, the planned development
(PD) will permit the following mixed uses on the Site:
P b 2 Minutes
~lanualy 30, 1985
age
10.7 acres of twppo family residential (2-F)
9.8iacresdofsmultlffemilyuhousingr acre
with a density of 20 "sits per acre
4.1 acres of warehouses
6.7 acres of retail/offices and showrooms
4.4 acres of offices and warehouses
Nr. Perseud stated there were 14 reply forms mailed to
roperty owners; three were returned. in favor and zero
n opposition.
Propertiesgs VHekstatedatheyharespropoaingtongaS37aacre
family, b60ilots g and a h total t of i p
126 units; 9.8 acres oof
multi-family housing with s density of 20 units to the
acre for a total of 200 units; east of the multi-family
zoning ve are proposing office warehouse use along the
frontage on Loop 288 and are proposing office showroom,
explveained oenerstion
ofi7s 000 for
treach ips pere day for'
the entire tract. He stated they recognize it doesn't
meet all regulations for a low intensity area and stated
he feels it should be a moderate intensity node. The
size of a moderate intensity node is dependa:,t upon
diversity of land use he continued. ;1n stated he feels
they are providing diversification as well as spirit of
moderate policies. He added the right-of-way for the
extension of Loop 288 will take up 12 acres of land in
that eras. He explained the surroundir.g lend uses and
intensities as well as physical ct.aracteristice of the
tract and added they do lend to a higher land use. He
said they feel it is a reasonable request ant! would ask
Commission to Pprove it.
Mr. V.P. Phillips, an area attorney, stated he is
representing Strata Properties, Mr. and Mrs. Turner
Gassaway are the current owners of the tract and all are
there time
not many residents. single family p homes d and out pp
stated in 288
opinion, no one would want to build a single family home
on this land. He added the land lends itself to commer-
cial type zoning and stated he doesn't feel its out of
the question for this type of development considering
the uther end of Loop 288, mainly the mall.
No one spoke in opposition to the request.
Mr. Perseud stated the service road indicated is a mouth
bound exit ramp and not a service road. He stated this
area is located in a low intensity area which can absorb
up to [,300 intensity trips to meet its planned capacity
and staff had to consider th.. highest trip generation
pian. The proposed development will genurate appro:.-
imately 9,050 intensity trips which is mote than three
times the averige standard allocation considering 75
trips per day per acre for low intensity areas. He
continued, if approved, this PD will exceed itt ;l;r:ned
capacity by 60730 trips or 11.6 percent. He added this
excess should be considered in view of the fact that
there is approximately 313 acres of land under the
agricultural (A) classification which may require
appvjpriste zoning some time in the future.
P S 2 Minutes
January 30, 1985
Page 3
Mr. Persaud continued the Development Guide recommends
as a specific standard that concentration of apartments
be strictly limited to 200 units in low intensity
areas. It further provides for a ►.eparati-)n of apart-
ment concentration by half a rile linear distance or 50
percent of intensity area length. This proposal in-
cludes 316 units of multi-family and two family apart-
ments in one location which exceeds the concentration
standards for low intensity areas. He stated the PD
proposal provides for over 11 acres of high intensity
uses including retail/office and show room with a
potential generation of 7,215 trips which is far in
excess of the concentration standards. This excess must
be considered in view of current commerical zoning
classification within half a mile of this site. He
further stated it is evident that the application of the
strip commercial policy in this area has been neglected
for some time and it is recommended to-At we strongly
consider the increasing negative impart,i which will
result in the future. Staff recommends denial of Z-1715.
On question from Mr. Juren, Ms. Carson answered, yes,
some of the 313 acres does have frontage on Loop 288,
The area was selected basically because of the exiRting
zoning end does include an area of single family
residences. She stated they are trying to limit the
size of the moderate nodes unless provision for a groat
deal of diversification is made, but retain the
character as a low intensity area. She added low
intensity is based on 690 acre model. She indicated oa
the intensity area study map that area 24 does include a
commercial area just south of Audrs Lane and one area of "
general retail located at the nor0ern end of Loop 288.
On question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Persaud answered
commercial, multi-family, or residential would be
allowed, but would have to be scaled down.
Mr. Juren asked if it IF during toning that we need
to discuss access or the platting stage. Mr. Perssud
stated in this case, the platting stage.
Mr. Watkins pointed out on the map the surrounding land
use and stated most of the land is vacant an3 what we
have submitted is a reasonable request and would like
for staff to show where they are in violation of any of
the density policies or stendards. He stated they had
initially planned to come before the Commission on
January 2, but talked to the planner and decided to work
out some of the details to get a favorable recommenda-
tion. He asked, as the Loop 288 overpsss is going in in
the area, who would put a single family home there.
On question, Mr. Vatkins explained the retail/office
showroom located at tae southeast corner of the tract,
and said it would be like c furniture showroom. Which
requires a great deal of square footage.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
i
Mr. Sidor commented considering the location and what is
proposed along Loop 288, he cLn't think of anything more
appropriate.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-1715. Seconded by Mr. Juren and motion carried 5-1.
(M r. Zscus voted no.)
DATEI 02-19-85
CITY COUNCIL RB, ORT FQRlt11T
T0: tlayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE Z-1719
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1719 at its meeting
on January 16, 1985 and voted 7-0 to recommend denial.
SUMMARY:
This is a tract of 10,700 sq. ft. situated at the southwest corner
of Parkway Street and Carroll Boulevard and currently occupied by a
singlo family house with a detached garage.
BACKGROUND:
The site is located in a low intensity area which has exceeded
planned capacity by 24%. Office zoning on this site is not
compatible with the policies and development standards as set out in
the Denton Development Guide.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable
Respe Ili ubmi to .
4 •
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
t +
Harry N. ersaud
Development Review Planner
Appro d: UAU
Jeff Mey r
Director cf Planning
and Community Development
09508
f Y 4
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO ViE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1719 Meeting Date: February 19. 1985
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: T. E. Uland
Status of Applicant: (,wner-Developer
Requested Action: Change in the current zoning
classification from multi-family
(MF-1) to office (O)
Location and size: The lot is situated at the southwest
corner of Parkway Street and Carroll
Boulevard and more fully described as
Lot 8, Block 2 of the first amendment
to the first installment of the
Carroll Park Addition and containing
approximately 10,7C0 square feet.
Existing Land Use: Single family house with detached
garage: MF-1
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family; 2F
' South - Single family; MF-1
Nast - Office and Multi-family; O,
MF-1
West - Single family; MF-1
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated low intensity.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: The site is not within the flood
plain and drainage is considered
adequate.
(Case # Z-1719)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
Transportation: Carroll Boulevard has been identified
as a primary major arterial on the
Denton Thoroughfare Plan. No access
will be allowed on Carroll. Side-
walk will be required on Parkway
Street.
Vublic Utilities: There is an Axisting 181, water line
on the south side of Parkway and a 6"
eanitary sewer line along Parkway
which connects to 8" sanitary sewer
line on Carroll. These will provide
adequate capacity for a small office
i development.
ANALYSIS
The proposed zoning change from multi-family (MB-1) to office
(0) classification on this site is not consistent with the Dente
Development Guide policies.
1. Intensity Standards
The trite is located within a low intensity area with i
planned intensity capacity of 36,157 trips. According to
existing land uses within this area, the planned intensity
standard has boon exvesded by 24t or 8,665 trips. When
viewed in terms of existing zoning or "existing use rights"
the area would exceed the planned capacity by as much as 33%.
The proposed zoning change will generate an additional 36
trips estituatiug 350 t/d/ac for office development. This
increase may appear to be infinit.asimal but it, should be
considered in terms of the overall impacts in &ddition to
the fact that a precedenu of "up zoning" is to be created.
2. Protection of Existing Hou JM
The Development Guide strongly recommande the preservation
of our eyisting housing .-A ock aA a priority policy. The
existing neighborhood %,zt of Carroll Boulevard and along
Parkway Street comprise of older residential single family
and duplex type developments which require protection from
tr.Iffic, noise, peivacy and home property values. "Spot
zoning" as in this inatance could threaten neighborhood
atability and result in poor maintenance of residential
properties.
(Case N Z-1719)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (Continued)
3. Commercial/Office Development on Carroll Boulevard
The Development Guide has established Carroll Boulevard as a
major north/south throughway and maintaining a throughway
traffic flow is a high priority. It is recommended there-
fore that commercial strip development along Carroll
Boulevard be strongly discouraged. The Guide, however,
allows for selected nodes to be developed for multi-family
and office development subject to certain site conditions
being fulfilled.
a. Site design to protect adjacent single family requiring
such things as screening fences, large setbacks, land-
scaped front yard, sign control, etc.
b. Site design to ineure good off-street circulation and
parking and very limited curb cuts in order to minimize
trai°fic disruption on Carroll.
This site comprises approximately 10,725 square feet and
abutts Carroll Boulevard. The site is too small to allow
for proper site planning and design to accomodate off-street
parking, large setbacks and landscaped front yard.
Since there is limited space on th3 site to permit good
off-street circulation, direct access on to Carroll
Boulevard is a serious disadvantage as it will serve to
disrupt the flow of traffic on this major thoroughfare. On
the other hand, Parkway Street has been designed for resi-
dential access and curb cuts on that side would encourage
undesirable site design and traffic flow.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1719 at its
meeting on January 16, 1985 and voted 7-0 to recommend denial.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition.
2. Deny petition.
tol
f
'(Case Z-1719)
Page Four
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map
2. Letters from Mr. Uland
3. Replies from Planning and Community Development Department
4, Reply form totals
5. Property owner list
6. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
January 16, 1985
09508
u i, a
71 SAW
WAY
e
~ ^ 11Elt,NT
MAI
iROAawAT s
F1 El
F] 0' FILILILIL
o Li:vsf c~O LI~IL~ O R ~~C~pgR 6ER
19
Q
A401Al0 ~C
ANO
ILARL
~ w+rata ~ i U9
M" 1911%cr
rF oAA ° = EIL-j E_
Ll M 9 000 0-
l 1 A CJ CJ OL
1~a asaerJ L~ `I
F~i
AM
SYtAAlOA FO r-tA
CNt!?NU7 ~ ~ N. ~ CNt!► Ui ~ L St, •
r .r
N N O~ ,r,~' . • `ems'
16
PLE IE III. all i
J°
January 21, 1985
17'i Mr, Harry N. Persaud
Development Review Planner
City of Denton, Texas
.f
'if I
Res Marjorie Uland's Denied Zoning Change Request
Dear Mr, Persauds
As per our conversation, please schedule us R meeting with
the City Council as we want to appeal the denial of our
change of zoning request.
The reason given for the denial wae too broad and based solely
on emotion rather than factual information, potential traffic
and parking problems. Please supply us (Council copy also) with
the following informations
1. Number of accidents on the entire length of Carroll
at all office and vetail stores driveways, entering
or exiting, during the past year.
4% 2. Was anyone in,juried?
3. Total of all accidents on Carroll during the past year,
and what perc6nt was at said driveways?
4. In reference to the alleged potenial parking problems,
"Have any of the simular structured office and lot size
experienced a parking problem, if so, who are they?
5. Is the lot size ano existing structure !House only) too
small to support two or three offices? Explain your
answer,
4
Thank you for supplying us with the above information. This will
enable us to have a decision based on facts rather than emotion.
Sincerely
T. F. Uland
1800 Cordell
ti;t
.
7.~
F•-
a
, ~t
' r t
.~~r :fir V F 7Vr tvln
WY ofDLNTON,TtX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566.8200
January 31, 1985
Mr, T. E. Uland
1800 Cordell
Denton, Texas 76201
Dtar Mr. Uland:
Subject: Z-1719
The Planning and Community Development Department received your
letter appealin to the City Council the decision of the Planning
and Zoning Commission to recommend denial of your request for a
change in zoning from the multi-family (MF-1) district to the
office (0) zoning classification at 501 Parkway Street. Your
request has been scheduled for a public hearing before the City
Council on February 19, 1985, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber
of the Municipal Building. Your presence or a representative's
presence is very important at this meeting in order that the
Council may obtain complete information regarding your request.
With reference to your letter dated January 21, 1985 requesting
information relating to traffic flow, parking and accidents on
Carroll Boulevard, I regret to inform you that we vould be unable
to respond to your request in such a short period of time. I
would like to further advise you that this information can be
obtained from the traffic office of the Police Department.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
me at 566-8350.
Sincerely,
Harry N. Persaud
Development Review Planner
ab
t .ti e ~ ..1{ . +x4 "9 Att :1"Y.e 7 L . 7~ ~1e i.~l~~"~~^ a„~`~W MT19'3 ~c~
February 4, 1985
Mr. Harry N. Persaud
Development Review Planner
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Persa.:d:
Reference Marjorie IJland's Denied Zoning Change Request and
the failure to answer our letter, dated 21 January 1985, re-
questing the factuel information.
It is imperative that We and the City Council receive the
factual information as it is our right to have a fair and
impartical hearing. If you need more time to compile the in-
formation, you have our permission.
Thank you for your assistance as iL will as.9ure us of an in-
telligent decision based upon facts rather than emotion.
Sincerely,
1'2 eT. E. Uland \
1800 Cordell
Denton, Texas 76201
~s -'mss s.''n . .17 '
77 1
t
C17Yof DENTOM, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.82M
February 5, 1985
Mr. T.E. Uland
1800 C:rdell
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Uland:
Ret Z-1719
In reference to your letter of January 21, 1985, requesting
additional information, i wish to advise you as followsr We
are not in a position to furnish you with information relating
to traffic accidents on Carroll Boulevard as this su:lect was
not mentioned in the staff report to the Planning ans Zoning
Commission. The staff report is based primarily on the policies
of the Denton Development Guide.
With respect to questions 4 and 5, I must explain that the sub-
ject site was originally planned and designed for residential
development and according to the policies and standards of the
guide, this site is too small to properly accommodate office
development under the office district (0) zoning classification.
So far, the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission has
been based on the staff report and the same report is to be sub-
mitted to the City Council at their meeting on February 19, 1985.
1 am enclosing a copy of that report for your information and
i will be pleased to answer any questions directly arising out
of that report.
Please feel free to obtain any additional information from any
source you consider appropriate to support or refute the recom-
mendation of the staff report.
Sincerely,
Harry N rpersaud
Development Review Planner
db
encl.
1
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1719
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
K. S. Church, Jr. Elsie A. Dicus
7116 Monterrey 516 Parkway
Fort Worth, TX 76112 Denton, TX
566-9018
Richard E. Cooper
#1 Timbergreen Circle Mrs. M. D. Penry
Denton, TX 517 Parkway
566-1321 Denton, TX
(conditionally)
~f. e .i S i {tii ~..AL [k t t nN 1 L, mr
M
a2
.9 oxw /m
1 ~~D
r
rf /
`7 v ~ C • ~
O !
D
ju 4~ 14 At
G,
K
` plow .
f[ U
r
f
z
13
~ r.. Tory •F j is' f Y i 4 k ~ y r r,
3 C'~0
41
~'C 1J re/Vl~r~C
c. ;cc
/xv
- ~ lied
2rft.
0l s0.
1 11-9
s ~
1
1
II
I !
....rte...
P i Z Minutes
January 16, 1985
Pag e 2
Mr. LeForte math a motion to approve the consent agenda.
Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanim3usly carried (7-0).
Ill. Public Hearings
A.r 2-1719. This is the petition of T. E. Uland requesting
a cTia-nge in zoning from the multi-family (MF-1) dis-
trict to the office (O) zoning classification at 501
Parkway Street. The lot is located at the southwest
corner of Parkway Street and Carroll Boulevard and is
more particularly described as Lot 8, Block 2, of the
First Amendment to the First Installment of the Carroll
Park Addition.
Mr. Pereaud stated there were 20 reply forms mailed to
property owners: three were returned in opposition and
one in favor not on the mailing list.
Mr. Tilman Uland stated his request is to change the
zoning from multiple family dwellings to office zoning.
He stated the property is located across the street
from the Chamber of Commerce. He distributed to the
Commission pictures of the dwelling and stated it was
built in the 1930's. He continued if allowed to be
zoned office, he would spend a considerable amount to
fix ~,p the property. He stated one of the arguments
of the planners is the curb cuts on Carroll Boulevard.
He described the surrounding areas and added he is
proposing an attractive building which would be an
asset to the neighborhood.
On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Uland stated his
plans are to utilize the current drive and curb cut.
On question from Mr, LaFOrte, Mr. Uland stated his lot
is the same size as the one recently zoned office at
the corner of Congress and Carroll Boulevard and added
he feels he can meet the parking requirements as it is
a big lot.
Mr. Steve Griffith, 607 Parkway, presented to the
Commission a petition from the neighbors in opposition.
He stated he feels it would be detrimental to this
area, as the parking is not sufficient. He continued
students from the junior high sclool park along Pariwray
and there is often only one lane of eraffic through
there. He stated visibility is obstructed and added
he doesn't feel an office at this location would
benefit the area. He stated he feels it is not safe
for the children in the neighborhood and would devalue
the surrounding property.
Mr. Pereaud continued the site is located within a
low intensity ares. He stated the Development Guide
rtrongiy recommends the preservation of our existing
older housing stock as a priority policy. He stated
"spot zoning" as in this instance could threaten neigh-
] boyhood stability and result in poor maintenance of
reidential properties. He added Carroll Boulevard
as a najor throughway and maintaining a throughway
traffic flow is a high priority, it is recommended
therefore that commercial strip development along
Carroll Boulevard be strongly discouraged. He added
the site is too small to allow for proper site plan-
ning and design to accommodate off-street parking,
large setbacks and landscaped front yard. He stated
since there is limited space on the site to parmit
off-street circulation, direct access on to Carroll
Boulevard is a serious disadvantege as it will serve
P i Z minutes
January 16, 1985
Page 3
to disrupt the flow of traffic on this major thorough-
fare. Parkway has been designed for residential
access and curb cuts on that side would encourage
undestreable site design and traffic flow.
On question from Mr, LaPorte, Mr. Ellison stated he
did not know how long the Red Cross had been using
their current facilities as an office. He added it
could have been since prior to 1969.
On question from Mr, Juren, Mr. Persaud stated yes,
office zoning would generate more traffic than multi-
family. He gave the generation trips per day for both.
On question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Clark stated Carroll
Boulevard as is, is as large as has teen projected.
Mr. Ellison stated the Development Guide does allow
for selected nodes to be developed for multi-family
and office development subject to certain site con-
ditions. He stated the office at Congress and Carroll
Boulevard was approved by City Council with smaller
setbacks and it is too close to the other residents in
the area.
Mr. Uland in rebuttal, stated the garage shown in the
pictures he distributed, will be removed which will
allow for more parking. The curb cut is 40 feet from
the corner of Parkway and there is no visibility ob-
struction to his knowledge. He stated homes built in
the 20's and 30's are beautiful homes and are worth
preserving and stated he would hate to tear it down,
rather he would like to spend more to fix it up.
On question fror, Mr. Claiborne, Mr. UlAnd stated yes,
the main ingress - egress would be Carroll Boulevard.
Chair declared the public hearing closi:d.
Mr. Pearson stated if we continue to permit additional
office and commercial development on Carroll Boulevard,
it will increase the traffic.
Mr. LaPorte commented he feels it is unfair to
Mr. Uland as there already exists office zoning in
the area: however, since further offico and commercial
development in this area is discouroged, he intends
to vote against the petition.
Mr. Sidor commented he feels this would threaten
further development of office and commercial on
Carroll Boulevard and he intends to vote against
the proposal.
Mr. Escue made a motion to deny Z-1719. Seconded by
Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (7-0).
B. 221720. This is the petition of R. J, Button request-
ing a change in zoning from Specific Use Permit 166
(Lake-wood Estates Mobile Home Park) to the general
retail (OR) toning district on a 2.9 acre tract
situated in the Stephen Hembrie Survey, Abstract 643.
The property is located at the northeast corner of
Robinson Road and FM 2181 (Teasley Lane).
Ms. Spivey stated there were three reply forms mailed
to properly cwneret 2 wore returned in favor and zero
in opposition.
DATE: 02111/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 90 C-:1-- 0
FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE Z-1722
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1722 at it's meeting
on January 30, 1985 and voted 5-1 to recommend approval subject to
conditions attached.
SUMMARY:
This is a tract of 6.34 acres situated south of snd abutting US Hwy
380 in the vicinity of Cindy Lane.
BACKGROUND:
The site is located in a moderate intensity area which is relatively
undeveloped and far below planned capacity. Moderate intensity
areas encourage diversity of land uses. Conditions of approval are
attached to encourage strict site planning and compliance with the
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable
Rasps cljulubmte
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Harry N.Cpersaud
Development Review Planner
Appr, ads
Jeff Key
Development of Planning,
and community Development
0604)
r .`s. ~:a.. w •...r Tn r, d"j:`I T. '-C ~t ) lp~r
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
~r
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1722 Meeting Date: February 19. 1985
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Charles Watkins
representing
Robert J. Caraway
500 E1 Paseo Drive
Denton, TX 76205
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in the current zoning classifi-
cation from Agriculture (A) to Planned
Development (PD). If approved the PD
will permit the following uses.
1. 2.17 acres of multi-family
apartments with a density of 20
units per acre.
2. 4.17 acres of commercial type uses.
Location and Size: This is a tract of 6.34 acres situated
south of and abutting U.S. Flwy 380 in
the vicinity of Cindy Lane.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family housing;
Agricultural (A)
South - Vacant; Agricultural (A)
East - Church; Agricultural (A):
West - Singta family; Agricultural (A)
Denton Development Guide: Site is located within a moderate
intensity area.>
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: Part of this tract is in the flood
plain. Channel improvements may be
required depending on the Engineering
study.
`
(Case Z-1722)
Paye Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Utilities: 121, water line along US Hwy 380 is
adequate for this project. However
the 1011 sanitary sewer line may be
inadequate depending on the time
frame of this development. If the
capacity of the line is used up by
that time a line will need to be
extended 9,500 ft. south to an
existing 1211 line.
Transportation: US Hwy 380 requires 601 right-of-way
from center line. Side walk required
along frontage of property. Cindy Lane
may be extended south of US Hwy 380
after further study.
ANALYSIS
The proposals to use and develop land within this planned
development District (PD) are consistent with the Denton
Development Guide policies.
Land Use Diversity
The general objective of a moderate activity center is to
encourage a mixture of land uses with the view of achieving
balanced city wide growth. The size of these centers may vary
depending on the actual mixture of land uses that are implemented
over a period of time. A prototype mix that encourages diversity
and the community unit concept would see a center towards the
higher end of the acreage range whereas a specialized center.
say commercial would need to be towards the small size.
The Guide clearly recommends that diversity should be encouraged,
i,e., a mixture of housing, commercial, office, public
facilities, open space, etc, as opposed to limiting the size of
moderate centers with specialized development, i.e., all
Commercial. The proposed PD will permit a mixture of commercial
and high density housing.
~ k ~ • :5 Gfi J s.n Y , r ir. e' f:1 ~ '1 r a ' qA a 4 ' i'
f ,
(CA'60' 2-1722)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
High Density Housing
The Guide specifically provides for high density housing in
major centers under the following limitations.
o Used for buffering
o Used for diversity
o Access to major thoroughfares required
o Limit concentrations in one place (500-1000 units)
o Good site design standards to protect single family areas.
(large set-backs, landscaped front yards, screening fences
traffic to major street only).
In this case the multi-family housing is used to provide for
diversity and at the same time it will serve to buffer the
commercial development from the existing church. The site will
have direct access to a primary major arterial and the total
number of units (43) is far below the permitted concentration
limit of 500-1000 units in one location.
Denton Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations
The site is located within an area of 33 square miles which is
controlled by the Airport Zoning Act. More specifically the
site is within the horizontal zone which is a surface established
150 feet above the Airport elevation or a height of 7190 feet
above mean sea level and shown on Denton Municipal Airport
Hazard Zoning reap dated June 1. 1979. Height limitations, use
restrictions and future material change of use in this site will
be controlled and regulated by the relevant and applicable
provisions contained in the Denton Municipal Airport and Zoning
Regulations (Order 81-1).
condition -of Approval
In order to promote and enhance good site planning, design and
neighborhood aesthetics in that general area abutting U.S. Hwy
3801 it is important to restrict the permitted uses under the
commercial zoning classification (C). The general objective is
to offer protection to existing developments in that
neighborhood as well as to ensure better compatibility and
harmonious coexistence of the proposod uses on the same site.
Certain types of uses such as dance halls, night clubs, open
salvage yards, stables, etc. which are likely to create
undesireable intrusion into the planning and development of that
neighborhood are to be restricted.
(Case Z-1722)
Page Four
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered Z-1722 at it's
meeting on January 30, 1985 and voted 5-1 to recommend approval
of Z-1722 subject to the following conditions:
1. Multi-family housing shall not exceed 20 units per acre
2. Right-of-way dedication of 60' for a public street is to be
provided along the eastern boundary of property
3. Solid 6' screen walls are to be provided along the eastern
and western boundaries of the property and between the
commercial and residential multi-family areas
4. Building lines of 25' are to be provided as shown on the
site plan.
5. All driveways, parking and drainage requirements including
all other development standards not controlled by these
conditions shall conform to the Denton Subdivision and Land
Development Regulations
6. The following commercial type uses are prohibited:
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dance hall or night club
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or storage company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or
Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for Rage or Machinery, etc
Petroieism Collecting or storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
outside a Building
Theater, Drive-in
.;y,. f •~ee ..,r . f_., Flu f,a 'qv t„,
s
(Case Z-1722)
Page Five
RRCOMMENDATION (Continued)
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
ALTKRNATIVES
1. Approve petition with conditions
2. Approve petition without conditions
3. Approve petition with additional conditions
4. Deny petition
ATTACHMENT
1. Location map
2. Reply form totals
3. Property owner list
4. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
January 30, 1985
0604)
I '
fl ~
1
F
I • ~
•34 i
1
.a
t
` t
' • I PD-13 -
w
i r 7
122
•r r r r
1
PD-84 j
r r r r •
J
L
C
A -N-
' _A... __._-_.-..-..-._j
E - Lis NWr !ate ca - - - -4 - -
w 1/rr wufn NI4t 0 ~t .Iru J1J.y
V4 rC y .YM.r tY \ r M.[LO
!t IOC ow
so
1OCATION MAO
- 7T~
r love
p -.tom. .Oe~ rlf•f.l4Y •OUYC. 4yl ~ ,
N. IYY.V if lC4r \ 1 . 1 . , r • ! 1 . , l; V . 1 y O ry yOlrNW1 MYf
tOM*[4CIAL1 M I. ! r
n ' ~ 1~ k f
o ~ / 7 ~ ra•N . td10\ 1V. r•Y.uM! rMl 4•. r l~s
n , pO1.4w r0M1l r.,tY rte r•le ryf
1 4rarw. NoN. rW 9Y uM
y ~ ~ f.4K4n eY4Y .l\. IY41. tWCe rrr'Jr•
}`II` ~ A ~t 0 wr n.aer•w o. rw nr. N an~•!+ wt.
~ C \ r Iln,w• aeKrfn • •n
t ~ N ! Ul1YW {•ue, Y •f Y'M'nft •'a
~ nM rul4 4N
r~~ L 1 I . ftn.. paw It vYlr\
too, .`i.,l 1
1 I
OPEN SeACt
I
Iffly-
___I _..•-.--=._.•___...,rl,erw♦\frl s•. ,+.y~r•rongr-.-575
l I' a ' 4• t•. t 1 \ . J• f t 0 4 f
I
Mt~,ei•Y. tlYllrr fVY /ffIN11{
III Ac $011 CAIAMI
WM. 64Y AN %V. A-49 100 It PASO o
env d !OLAM N 01000N,11 -%ws
OtArtON, TtM A! HA4 rBUA4% .,W9
50 11W.
0,04 WpWWWM In^ Mom
now
~'7r2z
z PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
2-1722
IN FAVOR iN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Bethel Temple Church None Received
John Stout, Pastor
3813 West University
Denton, TX
387-3741
(conditionally)
II
tr,
i'• ;^i iT F'f ~ Ci`:`TYl _ Tfi. A~' e"'~k, 4 f
_ r I y r;
T
r
n
AL
I y
t~
T- -Am 4
4
.mow
r~~
p i I Minutes
January 30, 1985
Page 4
8.1 2-1722. This is the petition of Robert J. Caraway,
represented by Cnarles Watkins, requesting a change in
the current coning classification from agricultural (A)
to planned development (PD) district on a tract of 6.34
acres situated south of U. S. Highway 380 in the vicin-
ity of Cindy Lane and shown in the William Bryan Survey,
Abstract 0148, City of Denton. if approved, the pro-
posed planned development will permit the folleving
type of usesi
2.17 acres of multifamily apartment development
witn a density of 20 units per acre
4.17 acres of commercial type uses
Mr. Persauo stated tnere were four reply forms mailed
to property owneraj one was returned in favor (condi-
tionally) and zero in opposition.
Mr. Watkins stated ne ►s representing the owner. He
stated the property is currently occupied by an auto
body or auto repair shop and a single family nouse. He
said the neighbors on the east are Bethel Temple Cnurcn
and we p1.an to put a multi-family butter next to the
church and a screening fence on the church side and on
the west side of the tract next to tae commercial
zoning. He stated they did realize straight commercial
zoning was appropriate further down the road, but since
the property is located next to a church, decided to
come in with a PD. He stated they had talked to the
pastor of the church and they offered approval if
conditions were met. Condition one asked that zoning
for the multifamily apartment develo pzent net be a
federally funded subsidy and that the complex would
have a manager living in the complex] Mr. Watkins stated
there could be no guarantee that the multi-family de-
velopment would not be federally funded. Condition two,
asked that the church be allowed to tap into the sewer
at no charges he stated he feels this is a matter
between the church and the city. Condition three asks
tnat no alcnoi►c beverages be sold or pornographic
materials be permitted on the property; he stated tnere
will be no pornographic material and as far as a Wonolic
beverages, staff has cecomended that on premise conaump-
t►on be prohibited, however, we are asking for off prem-
ise sales for consumption elsewhere.
Un question from Mr. Sidor, car. WatKine statea no, there
is a 60 foot cignt-of-way between the church property
and our property.
Mr. Willingham, 3818 W. University, stated ne did no!
recieve a notice and assumed it was because he lived too
far from the propoaal to rlcieve one. He indicated ne
was in opposition as all of those places out in that
area are ranch style type areas.
Mr. Persaud stated in response to conditions asked by
the church, number one, in regard to federally funded
multi-family development, staff can't get involved in
that as the guide does allow for diversity of housing
and can't diaccimate. Number two, can't get involved
With that either and number three, we are requesting
that alcoholic beverages be prohibited. He continued
we officially felt no alcoholic bevor!iges should be sold
on the premises and we have no pxoblom with alcoholic
beverages sold and consumed elsewhere or taken away from
the premises.
Ms. Cole asked Mr. Morris to explain the ditterence
between on and off premise sale and consumption.
P S Z Minutes
January 30, 1985
Page S
Mr. Morris explained the difference and stated that
staff is asking for prohibition against on premise sale
of beer and wine.
Mr. Persaud stated he would like to also point out the
church does have a school operating there. He continued
the general objective of a moderate activity center is
to encourage a mixture of land uses with the view of
achieving balanceZ city wide growth. He stdted the
guide clearly recommends that diversity should be
encouraged, as oppposed to limiting the size of moderate
centers with apecialized development. The proposed PD
will permit a mixture of commercial and high density
housing.
He continued the site is located within an area of 33
square miles which is controlled by the Airport Zoning
Act and is in the horizontal zone which is a surface
established 150 feet above the airport elevation or a
height of 79D feet above mean sea level and shown on
Denton Municipal Airport Hazard zoning map. Height
limitations, use restrictions and future material change
of use in this site will be controlled and regulated by
the relevant and applicable provisions contained in the
Denton Municipal Airport and Zoning Regulations (Order
81-1).
He further stated in order to promote and enchance good
site planning, design and neighborhood esthetics in that
general area abutting U.S Highway 380, it is important
to restrict the permitted uses under the commercial
zoning classification. Certain apes of uses such as
dance halls, night clubs, open aalvage yards, stables,
etc., which are likely to create undesireable intrusion
into the planning and development of that neighborhood
are to be restricted. He stated staff recommends
approval of Z-1722 with conditions.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Worts made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-1722 with the conditions as recommended by the staff
and prohibiting dance halls, night clubs or pornographic
parlors. Motion failed for lack of second.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1722
with the following conditions:
1) Multi-family housing shall not exceed 20 unite per
acre
2) Right-of-way dedication of 60' for a public street
is to be provided along the eastern boundary of
property
3) Solid 6 screen walls are to be provided along the
eastern and western boundaries of the property and
between the commercial and residential multi-family
areas
4) Building lines of 25' are to be provided as shown on
the site plan.
S) All drivewaya, parking and drainage requirements
including all other devalopment standards not
controlled by these conditions shall conform to the
Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations
6} The following commercial type uses are prohibited:
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
P 6 Z minutes
January 30, 1985
Page 6
Dance hall or night club
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Arta
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or
Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for Rage or Machinery, etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Outside a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
He added to the motion the on premise sale of beer and
wine be eltminated. Seconded by Hr. Pearson and carried
L5-1. (Mr. LsForte voted no.)
C. Z-1723. This is the petition of Randall D. Smith
iequestin a change in zontng from the single famLly
(SF-10) dfatrict to the multi-family restricted (MF-R)
classification on a 1.23 acre tract in the S. McCracken
Survey, Abstract 817. The property is more particularly
described as the northeast corner of Sherman Drive and
Kings Row. If approved, the property may be used for
any use permitted in the MF-R district by the City of
Denton Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Pearson left the meeting.
Ms. Spivey stated there were 14 reply forms mailed to
property owners; one was returned in favor and five in
opposition and one in opposition not on the mailing list.
Mr. Pearson returned to the meeting.
Randy Smith, owner of the propperty stated its was
requesting a change from SF-i0 to multi-family
restricted. He stated he is pro osing 16 single family
attached homes to be built on this corner. He stated he
feels this is an ideal location for single family
attapkad townhouse type development. He described the
property located at the southeast corner of Kings Row
and Sherman Drive. He added there is a fire station
across the street which is not asruticsi ay pealing
and said this property would not oe suitable for single
family homes and would ask the Commission for their
approval.
Y '::r i~ r ti `•_'"a.. Y.F ,';T~. 1-~-,Z1 ems: r .a ~ YyT v-.-i ~ ' ~ :.v` e. • t : r r,: f. ^ . S H .4 a
i
DATE: 02/19!85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council qo IL/
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CASE Z-1724
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at it's
meeting of January 30, 1985 and voted to recommend approval of
Z-172y by a vote of 6-0.
SUMMA-RI
This is a request for a change in zoning from the single family
(SF-10) olassificatioe to the planned development (PD) district on a
19.8 acre tract located on the east aide of Hinkle Drive between
Denton Center and Good Samaritan Village. If approved, the planned
development will permit the construction of a retirement campus with
67 unite of single family attached housing, 183 multi-family units,
and a 60 bed health care facility.
BACKGROUND-
The site is located in a low intensity area and proposed development
will not violate the standard for the area. The site plan for the
development insures that green space will be maintained and the
residential character of the area will be preserved.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFFCTEDt
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund
Respectfully submitted:
•
0, Chf`1d`WftSngF
City Manager
Prepared by:
,uac
Denieve"
Develorment Review Planner
Ap _1A%M#!nh -
Jeff a +
Director of Planning
and Community Development 0663a
-9 ~v
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMXNDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1724 Meeting Date: February 19, 1985
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: David Spalding, Real-Tech
1200 Copeland Road, #402
Arlington, Texas 76051
Statue of Applicant: Prospective developer
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the single
family (SF-10) classification to the
planned development (PD) district.
Location: East side of Hinkle Drive between
Denton Center and Good Samaritan
Village.
Size: Approximately 19.8 acres
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Good Samaritan Village; PD
South - Denton Center; GR
East - Fair Grounds; SF-10
West - Residential: SF-10
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated low intensity.
ya h r n.r t u S S .M
a _ ~ fr d .sr { a al :a a L
(Case 0 Z-1724)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Public Utilities: An existing 16" water line in Hinkle
Drive will provide sufficient water
service for this development. A 10"
existing sanitary sewer line is
currently at capacity. Developer
must run approximately 1.400 feet of
off-site sewer extension to and
across property. Pro rata and
oversize agreements may be set up
with the City. Electric, gas, and
telephone service are available to
this site.
Transportation: Access to the devolopment should be
located so that it %rill not create an
intersection with the existing access
point on the west side of Hinkle. A
sidewalk will be required along
Hinkle Drive.
Drainage: A channel and retention ponds will be
necessary to control the runoff from
this tract. The channel may be earth
lined to preserve the green space on
this tract.
ZONING HISTORY
This site was the subject of a zoning change request from the
single family (SF-10) district to planned development (PD)
classification in August of 1981. The developers proposed 240
multi-family units and 32 duplex aun1ts.on the 14.8 acre tract'. That
request was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission but
denied by the City Council due to strong neighborhood opposition.
ANALYSIS
The petitioners in this case are requesting planned development
(PD) zoning for a retirement campus, If approved, the planned
development will permit 67 units of single family attached
housing on 966 acres, with a density of 7 units to the acre, 183
multi-family units on 6.7 acres with a density of 32 units to
the aor** and a 60 bad health care facility on 1,3 acres.
i x ,,(Case M Z-17.,4)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
The Denton Development Guide designates low intensity areas as
the city's primary housing areas. Diversified land use and
small scattered sites of apartments (less than 200 units) are
permitted as long as; (1) there is strict site plan control
within one block of existing low density residential so that the
character of the area can be maintained: (2) traffic planning
insures access by a collector street or larger and traffic
does not flow through local streets; (3) the overall density/
intensity standard is not violated; (4) sufficient green space
and recreational facilities are provided and (5) there is input
into planning by the neighborhood.
The site plan submitted with tats application maintains the
character of the area of providing a 25 foot setback from the
front property line and restricting the height of the single
family attached structures to one story. The single family
attached structures form an intensity gradation between the
single family (SF-10) residential on the west side of Hinkle
Drive and the proposed multi-family and health care facilities.
Hinkle Drive is a collector street and the entrance to the
development is located in such a way that traffic would be
discouraged from using local streets to gain access to the
project. The proposed land use provides a transition to the
higher intensity uses on University Drive. The 3.3 acres of
open space is provided by the flood plain which crosses the
site. Denton Center is specified as a future transportation
terminal and the proposal is well within the intensity standard.
Finally, the developer has met with the neighborhood and appears
to have taken their concerns into consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Since this proposal to consistent with Development Guide
policies, the Planning and zoning commission recommeads approval
of 7.-1724 by a vote of 6-0 with the following conditions:
1. The property shall be developed in accordance with the
approved site plan.
2. The single family attached structures shall be no more
than one story in height.
3. The trees along the western property line shall be
retained as a screening device.
r:. .
(Case M Z-1724)
Page Four
_ t
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition without conditions
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
3. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Map
2. PD site plan
3. Reply forms total
4. Property owner list
5. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the meeting of
January 30, 1985
06239
A'
I I
I
r
I ~ I
I 1
Po-72.
cl.
r MP_I
I
1.
PD-8 'it
I_
VF,R
1
P 0 53'
1
IrTm
'3-
M F& I
J/
91
MF-R 4:"
I ! LI i 1
MF-I
Z-1724}.~'
I rrr.r rr. rrl
1 ~
r 1
MF•~
t 1 LL4► tl•a a•d Develop seat
.-le r..... a•IVa ralr7
71 Sol Mal a... r..w
s• os'~ d Attack"
aerw~"/ Site
Mai rlg««wam W
;W~i a.l yli~l I 1 ~..~.~.i' 'I►Mllaeae• -l1~
MIMl v.1 y~~.~.NW.II.'~~ Y~..w TTT
Ing
Single Family Zoning 3W.,,oo
i
laj 1~` ~ r 7
8 Su01a Family ZoNifto 0.4
Me«.r 1.011 rr l.w eu !~1!Lwl I~ f1 r..•.• arl a'" r,Wl
Mae
y.1»...•.I« l
w t C____~". _"i ~ ♦ r~_.._ uraj I~n4t2.
i .I~ HN r _ 7
•.l i•.• MME iM.i
is ouwebow" 0,a"kInd MW, ~-aa'~• ^p° to1.14.d AI•a 198451 aera
0414141 Retail teaup haaallr a•wd Iuyl• family
DEVELOPMff PLAN
1
a7..1 Iµ
PECAN CREEK .NT CASM STA1tAfE!!/gyp PARMERMP t1 j
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1724
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Solveig Olsen None Received
1205 Bryn Mawr
Denton, TX
565-2580
&"4 A
0 r "
- -
3~2
A AAA
0~0
ac, r
flZJ .
~ 5560
n ~ r v
A 1!
<s
wr~r
qo
D f~
i
L'am'
-10
A A,
* J/
a
JAWL
J,4* i
~+r7
W V t M, W W 1 J_ r'p Y
3 ' t, T h... i
P t 8 Minutes
January 30, 1985
Page 8
Mr. Jackson stated Mr. Smith did contact him and snow
him the plans and then later came back with revised
pans, but said he feels it is just too dense and too
hard to adjust one's thinking from SF-10 to multi-family
zoning. He suggested talking to the other neighbors and
maybe get together as a group.
Ms. Cornell asked is there anything else that could be
developed there, since there seems to be such a gap
between SF-10 and multi-family, that will be developed
as the site plan shows.
Mr. Escue answered no, not since tt,is is straight zoning.
Chair declared the JUDlic nearing clo4ed.
Mr. LaPorte mace a motion to deny Z-172e. Seconded by
Mr. Sidor ana carried 5-1. (Ar. Pearson voted no.)
Mr. Sidor commented that even it it was p.ermiesable to
have submitted a Fu roc townhouse development, ne would
not be in favor of it as it would not be in keeping with
the integrity of the neighborhood.
U.F! 1721. This is the petition of David Spalding,
representing Real-Tech, requesting a change in zoning
from the single family (SF-10) distelct to the planned
development (PD) classification on a 19.8 acre tract in
the R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31. The property is
located on the east side of Hinkle Drive a ppcoximately
800 teet north of University Drive (U. S. Highway 380).
It approved, the planned levelopment will permit the
development of a retirement campus with the following
land uses:
Single Family Attachea - 67 units on 9.5 acres
with a density of 7 units per acre
Muiti-Family - 183 units on 5.7 acres
with a density of 32 units par acre
Health Care facility - 60 bed facility on 1.3 acres
Ms. Spivey stated there were 17 reply forms ma►ieu to
property owners; three were in favor ana zero in
o pp»sition and two unaeciued.
Uave Spalding of Real Tech, a development company ut
Arlington described the surrounding land area.
Stan Haas, an architect of Dallas, explainea and snowed
slides of a retirement campus similar to the one
proposed. He statea the main access as snown on the
site plan has been moved to the middle of tho deveJo p-
ment and they will provide sidewalks.
Charles Starnes, consulting engineer with Starnes and
Associates in Arlington, stated he is part owner of this
property. He stated in dealing with this site, ne can
across the problem of Pecan Creek running througn the
back of the property, out, we feel we have taken a major
problem and turned it into an asset and a beautitul open
area. He stated they are proposing a detention pnna ana
have discussed the plans with the engineering aspert-
ment. He stated he uad met with the manager of the good
Samaritan and the manager Baia they have been nairWrea
to future development but by these improvements we are
proposing to the creek, it will help their future
development. He added on a national oasis, most
retirement campuses of this nature, have one vehicle oc
less and would not generate a lot of :raffle.
Xa ~ i' .fi. . a .~•;p.. h'., . L,kr Zz .'e° is
P i Z Minutes
January 300 1945
Page 9
Mr. Spalding stated they had had a meeting of 42 of tiie
area homeowners and most seemed to be acceptable to the
proposal. He stated they are going to leave the tree
line along Hinkle Drive. He stated the residents would
be an average of 65 years or older, and we found in our
survey rent would be from $800 to $1,000 rental or en-
dowment type plan would be offered wnich would include
one meal a day He explained the amenities and sur-
rounding facilities available.
No one spoke in opposition to the request.
Ms. Spivey stated this site was the subject of a zoning
change request from the single tamily Se-10 district to
planned development classitication in 1981. Tne
developers proposed 240 multi-family units and 32 units
on a 19.8 acre tract. The request was approved Dy the
Planning and zoning Commission but denied by the city
Council due to strong neighborhood opposition. She
stated the petitioners in ttsis case are requesting
planned development (PO) for a retirement campus. She
stated the Uenton Development Guide designates low
intensity areas as the city's primary housing areas.
Diversified land use and small scattered sites of
apartments (less than 20 units) are permitted as long
as 1) there is strict site plan control within one block
of existing low density residential so that the cnar-
acter of the area can be maintained; 2) traffic planning
insures access by a collector street or larger and
traffic does not flow through local streets= 3) the
overall density/intensity standard is not violated; 4)
sufficient green space and recreational facilities are
provided and 5) there is input into planning by the
neighborhood. She continued the proposal is well within
the intensity standaro. The develolac has met with the
neignoornood and appears to have taken their concerns
into consideration. Wherefore, since tnis pcolosal is
consistent with Development Guide policies, staff
recommends approval of z-1724 with conditions.
Mr. Spaluing said the type of people would ce elderly
and the property would be maintenan.e free for tnem.
He stated e.itra measures nave peen taken such as a guard
house to the entrance of the property, to prevent
crime. He stated there will isot be a lot of traffic,
therefore there is not a lot of need for larKing, in
most cases less than one car per unit.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of 14-1724
with the following conditions:
1) The property shall be developed in accoraancer with
the approved site plan.
2) The single family attached structures snall oe no
more tnan one story in height.
3) The trees along the western prcperty line snall oe
retained as a screening device.
Mr. Sidor _econded the motion and carried unanimously
V6-0) .
n . ' `r ixL
P i 'L Minutes
January 30, 1985
Page 10
Mr. Juren commented he wished more developers would talk
to the neighbors as these have done.
Mr. Sidor commented this is an laeai'location and it is
not likely we would have further development of resiaen-
tial nouses there.
Mr. Juren left the meeting.
E. Recommend approval of final re plat of Cooper Crossing,
Section 1.
At. Persaud stated this is a tract of approximately
61.59 acres situated east of and abutting Hercules
Lane. This site is zoned residential single family
under planned development district (PD-72). The
original plat contained an over-provision of easements
which would not allow adequate building area on some
lots. The replat will rationalize the provision of
easements on the site. The final replat conforms to
the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and
Land Development Regulations and staff recommends
approval.
Brian Burke stated he is the engineer on the project
representing the owner and is here to answer any
questions.
No one SPOKe in favor or in opposition to the request.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of the
final replat of Cooper Crossing, Section 1. Seconuea by
Ms. Cole ono unanimously carried (5-0).
F. Recommend approval of preliminary and final replat o£
the Golden Triangle Industrial ParK, Phase V.
Mr. Persaua stated this is a tract of 3.00 acres
situated north of and abutting Morse Street, aria east
of Loop 298. This site is zoned 11ght industrial and
oftice type development it: anticipated. Water, sewer,
electric, telephone, and solid waste services are
adequate and avaliaoie. btatf recommends approval of
the preliminary and final replat.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend approval of the
preliminary and 9bnal replat of the Golden Ttiangle
Industrial Park, Phase V, Seconded by Mr. 5i0or and
unanimously carried (5-0).
Q. Recommeno approval of final re plat of the Haywood
Addition, Block 1, Lot 1.
Mi. Persaud ^tatea this is a tract of 0.9787 acres
situated sovcn of and abutting Sycamore Street west
of Carroll doulevard and is zoned multifamily and tae
purpose of the re plat is to remove the existing lot line
so as to create one building site to accommodate multi-
family ar,velopment. He stated the drainage proposals
submittal are acceptaole. Staff recommends approval.
DATE: 02/19/85
OI~'Y COUNCIL RBPORT F►VMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 26
OF THE APPENDIX "B" ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DENTON TO PROVIDE FOR REFERRAL P31D REVIEW OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO DENY A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL. lA - ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval by a vote of
7-0.
SUMMARY:
For quite some time, the Planning and Zoning Commission observed a
policy requiring petitioners of change in zoning requests to ubmit
a written request for appeal of Planning and Zoning Commission
recommendation of denial within ten (10) days following the action
in order to register an appeal with the City Council. Approval of
this ordinance would establish the said practice and policy as law
and eliminate conflicts with the current zoning ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
The Plannir!t and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its
:meeting of January 16, 1985.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, Petitioners of
changing in zoning request, Planning and Community Development
Department
FISCAL THPACT:
N/A
Respec full submitt d:
G. Chris Hartung "
Prepared by: City Manager
~l
Jitlb-k alb
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Ap ov
Jeff Mag
Director of Planning
and Community Development 06749
w j,4 .y '.1 r .f S' .V .L.' N `r;,~°• y••w-_"~4 rn
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 26 OF APPENDIX B-ZONING OF T'd£ CODE
OF u7DINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO PROVIDE FOR REFERR.&T, AND
REVIEW OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO
DENY A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ONLY
UPON THE TIMELY REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That Article 26B (3) of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordi-
nances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to read as
follows:
(3) The planning and zoning commission shall hold a public
hearing on any appplication for any amendment or change
prior to making its recommendation and report to the
city council. if the commission recommends denial of
the zoning change, such request shall not be referred
to the council unless the applicant, within ten days
of the commission's decision, shall file a request in
writing wtth the Department of Planning and Community
Development requesting that the council review the
commission's recommendation. Written notice of all
public hearings before the planning and zoning commis-
sion on a proposed amendment or change shall be sent
to all owners of real property lying within two
hundred (200) feet of property on which the change is
requested. Such notice shall be given not less than
ten (1D) days before 'the date set for hearing by
posting such notice properly addressed and postage-
paid to each taxpayer as the ownership on the last
approved city tax roll.
SECTION II.
This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVFr) this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOT'rh
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.,
_ `YU
. r ~,r M a a .Y a s, ~ r ,ry a t P.y K, eK ~•_r T6
P Z Minutes
January 16, 1985
Page 11
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to grant postponement of
perimeter street paving improvements for both Schmitz
and Mingo Road (Oatman Addition) on the basis of the
staff recommendation. Seconded by Mr. Escue and
unanimously carried (7-0).
E. Recommend approval of proposed annexation of an
approximately 100 acre tract located south of U.S.
Highway 380 East, adjacent and east of Geesling Road,
and adjacent and north of Blagg Road (A-13).
Mr. Ellison stated the existing Capricorn Mobile Home
Park is situated on approximately 30 acres and con-
state of approximately 70 mobile home sites. Holigan
Development Corporation has submitted a preliminary
plat for 65 acres adjoining the existing park. He
stated the intent of the preliminary plat is to
achieve approval of a one lot subdivision allowing
the expansion of the existing park for a total of
approximately 600 units. He stated the existing park
will reportedly be significantly improved and public
utility problems may be solved. The developers ate in
the process of determining whether to petition for
voluntary annexation and zoning. He added it has been
indicated that the issue of annexation does not have
a significant bearing on development plans for the
owner's perspective. Annexation is the only way to
insure compliance with City of Denton Standards or
control the use through toning.
Mr. Ellison continued, state law permits a home rule
City, on its initiative, to annex a total of 10 per-
cent of the current land area per year. The City is
approximately 42.5 square miles in size and property
held over from periods when no annexation or limited
annexation occured can be added to the total. The
City C.juncil directed staff to initiate the annexation
process at its meeting of December 18, 1984.
Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend approval of the
proposed annexation of an approximately 100 acre tract
located south of U.S. Highway 360 East, adjacent and
east of Geesling Road, and adjacent arA north of Blagg
Road (A-13). Seconded by Mr. LaPorte and unanimously
carried (7-0).
F. Recommend approval of an ordinance amending Article 26
of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton to provide for referral and review of
the Planning and Vining Commission's recommendation to
deny a reques► for a change in zoning to the City
Council only upon the timely request of the applicant]
and providing for an effective date.
Mr. Morris explained the proposed ordinance amending
Article 26 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances for referral and review of the Commission's
recommendation to deny a request for a change in
zoning to the City Council only upon timely request
of the applicant. He stated the toning procedures are
set out by state laws which we incorporate in our
ordinances. The Planning and Zoning Commission is a
recommending bodyr they conduct the public hearing,
but do not have to make a recommendation. They can
make a recommendation if they wish. Following the
public hearing, he continued, the Commission makes its
recommendation %,o the City Council. In his opinion,
the petitioner need not do anything, whereas current
r P i Z Minutes
January 16, 1985
Page 12
procedures require that the potitoner appeal the
• decision to the City Council.
Mr. LaPorte reminded the Commission of procedural
problems with a recent zoning case. In this particu-
lar case, a motion for approval was made and failed
by a vote of 3-2. No motion for denial was made;
therefore, the case was forwarded to the City Council
with no recommendation. Mr. LaPorte expressed his
opinion that a motion that failed to gain approval was
synonymous with denial and asked for clarification on
this matter. He also commented that he thought the
Commission was operating under the Robert's Rules of
Order in which a motion that failed to gain approval
constitutes a motion for denial.
Mr. Morris commented that no certain rules on pro-
cedures had ever been adopted, but that the Commission
could adopt any rules for procedures that they may
desire.
Mr. LaPorte suggested that meeting procedures be put
on a future agenia.
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of
an ordinance amending Article 26 of Appendix B-Zoning
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton to
provide for referral and review of the Planning and
Zoning Commission's recommendation to deny a request
for a change in zoning to the City Council only upon
f
Cl y Mr.
the Claiborne timely and request unanimously carried applicant.
(7-O)econded b
f
G. Recommend approval of an ordinance repealing Article
10 of Appendix B-Zoning of tte Code of ordinances;
enacting a new Article 10 to provide for the issuance
of specific use permits; providing for a penalty in
the maximum amount of 81,004 for violation thereof;
providing for a severability clause; and providing
for an effective date.
Mr. Morris explained the proposed ordinance and the
penalty for violation.
Mr. Stdor made a motion to recommend the prcposed
ordinance repealing Article 10 of Appendix B-Zoning
of the Code of ordinances; enacting a new Article 10
to provide for the issuance of specific us! permits;
providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of
51,000 for violation thereof; and providing for i
severability clause. Seconded by Mr. Escue and
unanimously carried (7-0).
H. Discussion of proposed planned development ordinance.
Mr. Fanning stated this Planned Development Ordinance
is a preliminary draft as a result of the Commission's
discussion on it. He pointed out specific items of
significance such as; on page one, the purpose and
use is designed to be used for mixed use lots as well
as small lots; page two, a two-step process for large
lots and a one-step process for small tracts; page
three, alter it goes to City Council, the final only
goes to the Planning and Zoning Commission for final
action. He also pointed out the limited time aspect
and yhether to submit a final plan on whole tract or
allow i portion to develop.
t. ...T. .y N
2p
DATE: 02119185
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE 10
OF APPENDIX "B" ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; ENACTING A NEW
ARTICLE 10 TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIFIC USE PERMITS;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000 FOR
VIOLATION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. IA - ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.
SUMMARY:
If approved, the new Article 10 of Appendix B Zoning of the Code of
ordinances would be set definable standards for the issuance,
evaluation and control of specific use permits. The recommended
conditions for approval is particularly interesting and important as
is a time limit clause requiring construction or establishment of
the use within a year of the approval date. This ordinance was
recrmmended by the Acting City Attorney after discussion with staff
and members of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
BACKG.OUND:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval at its
meeting of January 16, 1995 by a vote of 7-0.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Building Inspection and/or Planning and Community Development
Department would have to monitor the status of approved uses to
insure compliance with time limitations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Respeu
IAR su b d'
- 7 xt~
,G. Chris Hartung
Prepared by: City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
j%pprov@q,
Ja *0ro
D►r
o P nniag
and Community Development 0674s
iq . t Wn s F A f ?:irS )e L
~ A
0947E
NO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE 10 OF APPENDIX B-ZONING OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES; ENACTING A NEW ARTICLE 10 TO PROVIDE FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF SPECIFIC USE PERMITS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE
MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1000 FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That Article 10 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordi-
nances is repealed.
SECTION It.
That a new Article 10 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances is enacted to read as follows:
Article 10. Specific Use Permits.
A. Purpose: This section provides the City Council the
opportunity to deny or to conditionally approve those
uses for which Specific Use Permits are required. These
uses generally have unusual nuisance characteristics or
are of a public or semi-public character often essential
or desirable for the general convenience and welfare of
the community. Because, however, of the nature of the
use, or possible adverse impact on neighboring properties
of the use, review, evaluation, and exercise of planning
judgment relative to the location and site plan of the
proposed use are required.
B. Permit Required: A building permit or certificate of
occupancy s a not be issued for any use to be located
in a zoning district which permits that use only as a
specific use unless a Specific Use Permit has first been
issued in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
C. A lication Procedure: An application fors Specific Use
arm t $a e e with the Department of Planning and
Community Development on a form prepared by that Depart-
ment. The application shall be accompanied by a site
plan which, along with the application, will become a
part of the Specific Use Permit, if approved. The
accompanying site plan shall provide the following
information:
1. Data describing all processes and activities
involved with the proposed use;
2. Boundaries of the area covered by the site p►an;
3. The location of each existing and proposed
building and structure in the area covered by the
site plan and the number of stories, height, roof
line, gross floor area and location of building
entrances and exits;
4. The location of existing drainage ways, and
significant natural features;
PAGE 1
Y ~
5. Proposed landscaping and screening buffers;
6. The location and dimensions of all curb cuts,
public and private streets, parking and loading
areas, pedestrian walks, lighting facilities, and
outside trash storage facilities;
7. The location, height and type of each wall, fence,
and all other types of screening; and
8. The location, height and size of all proposed
signs.
D. Public Hearings: The notification and public hearing
process tor a Specific Use Permit or revocations thereof
shall be the same as for zoning amendments under Article
26.
E. Conditions for Approval: A Specific Use Permit shall be
eaue only a o the following conditions have been
found:
1. That the specific use will be compatible with
and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of
other property, nor significantly diminish or
in,air property values within the immediate
vi,:inity;
2. That the establishment of the specific use will
not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of surrounding vacant property;
3. That adequate utilitlis, access roads, drainage
and other necessary supporting facilities have
been or will be provided;
4. The design, location and arrangement of all
driveways and parking spaces provides for the
safe and convenient movement of vehicular and
pedestrian traffic without adversely affecting
.he general public or adjacent developments;
5. That adequate nuisance prevention messuras have
been or will be taken to prevent or control
offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration;
6. That ditectionsl lighting will be erovided so as
not to disturb or adversely affect neighboring
properties; and
7. That there aye sufficient landscaping and screen-
in to insure harmony and compatibility with
adjacent property.
F. Additional Conditions: In authorizing a Specific Use
Permit, the Planning and Zoning Commission mav recommend
and the City Council may impose additional' reasonable
conditions neressary to protect the public int.rest and
welfare of the community including a time period for
which a specific usr permit is valid.
G. Time Limit: A Specific Use Permit issued under this
secs on s all become null and void unless construction or
use is substantially underway within one year of the
issuance of the permit unless an extension of time is
approved by the City Council.
PAGE 2
H. Revocation: A Spcific Use Permit may be revoked or
moUIfie , after notice to the property owner and a
hearing before the City Council, for either of the
following reasons:
1. The Specific Use Permit was obtained or extended
by fraud or deception; or
2. That one or more of the conditions imposed by
the permit has not been met or has been violated.
I. Amendments: The procedure for amendment of a Specific
sII-e"-Fermic shall be the same as for a new application,
provided, however, that the Director of the Department of
Planning and Community Development may approve minor
variations from the original permit whic:i do not increase
density, change traffic patterns, or result in any
increase in external impact on adjacent properties or
neighborhoods.
J. Processing Fee: A person making application for a
specific use permit shall pay a fee in an amount deter-
mined, and as from time to time amended, by ordinance
approved by the City Council, a copy of which shall be on
file with the Department.
SECTION III
-that if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof
to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it
would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such
invalidity.
SECTION IV.
That any person violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
One Thousand Dollars (;1,000.00); and each day and every day
that the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall
constitute a separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in
addition to and cumulative of, any other remedies as may be
available at law and equity.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14)
days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cavse the caption of this ordinance to be
PACE 3
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the city of Denton Texas, within ten (10) days of
the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of o 1985.
KI-CWD AR , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,~TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE 4
P Z Minutes
January 16, 1985
06 Page 12
procedures require that the petitoner appeal the
• decision to the City Council.
Mr. LaForte reminded the Commission of procedural
problems with a recent toning case. In this particu-
lar case, a mction for approval was made and failed
by a vote of 3-2. No motion for denial was made;
therefore, the case was forwarded to the City Council
with no recommendation. Mr. LaForte expressed his
opinion that a motion that failed to gain approval was
synonymous with denial and asked for clarification on
this matter. He also commented that he thought the
Commission was operating under the Robert's Rules of
Order in which a motion that failed to gain approval
constitutes a motion for denial.
Mr. Morris commented that no certain rules on pro-
cedures had ever been adopted, tut that the Commission
could adopt any rules for procedires that they may
desire.
Mr. LaForte suggested that meetial procedures be put
on a future agenda.
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of
an ordinance amending Article 26 of Appendix B-Zoning
of the Code of ordinances of the City of Denton to
provide for referral and review of the Planning and
Zoning Commission's recommendation to deny a request
for a change in zoning to the City Council only upon
the timely request of the applicant. Seconded by Mr.
Claiborne and unanimously carried (7-0).
0. recommend approval of an ordinance repealing Article
10 of Appendix S-Zoninq of the Code of Ordinances;
enacting a new Article 10 to provide for the issuance
of specific use permits; providing for a penalty in
the maximum amount of $1,000 for violation thereof;
providing for a severability clauses and providing
for an effective date.
Mr. Morris explained the proposed ordinance and the
penalty for violation.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend the proposed
ordinance repealing Article 10 of Appendix B•Zoning
of the Code of Ordinancest enacting a new Article 10
to provide for the issuance of specific use permits;
providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of
51,000 for violation thereof; and providing for a
severability clause. Seconded by Mr. Escue and
unanimously carried (7-0).
H. Discussion of proposed planned development ordinance.
Mr. Penning stated this Planned Development Ordinance
is a preliminary draft as a result of the Commission's
discussion on it. He pointed out specific iteus of
significance such ast on page one, the purpose and
use is designed to be used for mixed use lots as well
as small lots; page two, a two-step process for large
lots and a one-step process for small tractst page
three, after it goes to City Council, the final only
goes to the Planning and Zoning Commission for final
action. He also pointed out the limited time aspect
and whether to submit a final plan on whole tract or
allow a portion to develop.
. a".:'r av. 7 . '1 f 3nN
DATE: 02119/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FO
TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER r AMENDING ARTICLE 12 OF APPENDIX
"B" ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO
PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDED DEFINITION OF "KINDERGARTEN OR NURSERY",
DECLARING ALL EXISTING KINDEGARTEN OR NURSER?' FACILITIES LEGAL USES;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.
SUMMARY:
This ordinance was precipitated by the day care center code
violation issue. As discussed, the proposed definition of
Kindergarten o.: Nursery shall be directly tied to language utilized
by the Texas Department of Human Resources.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its
meeting of January 2, 1985 by a vote of 6-0.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
Respect ull submitte
0. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
1 1 I~ I David Ellison
Senior Planner
App ve
Jeff M ye
Director of Planning
and Community Development 0674s
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 12 of APPENDIX B--ZONING OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDED DEFINITION OF
I "KINDERGARTEN OR NURSERY," DECLARING ALL EXISTING KINDERGARTEN
OR NURSERY FACILITIES LEGAL USES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I.
That Article 12A(13) of Appendix B--Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances is amended to read as follows:
13. Day nursery or Kindergarten. A facility for which a
person is required to obtain a license from the Texas
Department of Human Resources, or division thereof, by
Chapter 42 of the Human Resources Code (V.T.C.S.),or any
successor statute, for the operation of a "facility," child
care facility" or "child placing agency" as defined therein.
SECTION It.
That any day nursery or kindergarten, as defined in Section
I, which is in existence on the effective date of this ordinance
is jeclared to be a !awful use of the property and need not
obtain a specific use permit for continued operation.
SECTION 111.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and
effect from and afttr the date of its passage, and it is so
ordained.
PASSED AND APTROVED by the City Council of the City of
Denton, Texas,-thia the day of , 198
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE SICKETAR4
CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C 11y, OF DENTON, TEXAS
s
§ 42.002 HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Title 2
§ 42.002. Definitions
in this chapter:
(1) "Child" means a person under 18 years of age.
(2) "Division" means the division designated by tl:u depart.
ment to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
(8) "Child-care facility" means a facility that provides care,
training, education, custody, treatment, or superviaion for a child
who is not related by blood, marriage, or adoption to the owner
or operator of the facility, for all or part of the 24-hour day,
whether or not the facility is operated for profit or charges for
the services it offers.
(4) "Child-care institution" means a child-care facility that
provides care for more than 12 children for 24 hours a day, in-
cluding facilities known as children's homes, halfway houses, res-
idential treatment camps, emergency shelters, and training or
correctional schools for children.
(6) "Foster group home" means a facility that provides care
for 7 to 12 children for 24 hours a day.
(6) "Foster family home" means a facility that provides care
for not more than six children for 24 hours a day.
(7) "Day-care center" means a facility that provides care for
more than 12 children under 14 years of age for less than 24
hours a day.
(8) "Group day-care home" means a facility that provides
care for 7 to 12 children under 14 years of age for less than 24
hours a day.
(9) "Registe:ad family home" means a facility that regularly
provides care in the caretaker's own residence for not more than
six children under 14 years of age, excluding the caretaker's own
children, and that provides care after school hours for not more
than six additional elementary school siblings of the other chil-
dren given care, but the total number of children, Including the
caretaker's own, does not exceed 12 at any given time.
(10) "Family day home" means a facility that provides care
for not more than six children under 14 years of age for leas
than 24 hours a day not in the caretaker's own residence nor in
the residence of one or more of the children.
(11) "Agency home" means a private home that provides
care for not more than six children, that Is used only by a H.
censed child-placing agency, and that meets division standards.
8A
Ch. IZ CHILD-CARE FACILITIES § 42.021
(12) "Child-placing agency" means a person other than the
natural parents or guardisn of a child who plans for the place-
ment of or plsces a child in an institution, agency home, or adop-
tive home.
(13) "Facilities" includes child-care facilities and child-plac-
Ing agencies.
(14) "State of Texas" or "state" does not include political
subdivisions of the state.
Revisor's Note ~k
UMcrIt
Definitions (1) and (b) in the source )sty are in the ,eneral def-
t ~y a A ►',i initions in Chapter 11 of this code,
'
l
4 A G t~A l d"ical Now
- Prier laws Vernon's Ana.Ctv.et. art. qle, 1 t(a1,
outset. t.
r Act 1090, 44th Lei. P. ill.
Arts t!{f. 47th Ut•. V. 111, eh. Gil, 1 1. Aels t/ff. 64th Ug.. D• !t{t, ch. T/t. 11
Acts 1149, $lot toes.. p' 141. h. 401. 1 1. Yerqon's Ann.Ctv.9t. art, ItSa-!, 12.
Act 1tTf. 11th lost.. p• 191
e Cross llefereem
Adoption, see V,T.C.A. Falnt)y Code, 1 16.01 et seq.
e Library ltefeream
..J.9. infant 11 f, 1. 10. it. 41, 41, 11, Is.
r infants 4=11.
4 Now of Decidiow
t. in general }kpartment of Human Resources) concern-
es A baby sitting facility which die not Cara yng Convalescent ehlldren's boarding homes
for more than alt children was not a eom- and convalescent children's tooter group
24 meccisl day care center and therefore not hones are Confined to those facilities
eubleet to the licensing provisions of 1 f(a) whose primary purpose is the treatment
of '.rmer Yernon's Ann.Civ,st. art. 60k and care of physkally hs.~dlcapDed children
Use, how, this chapter). op•Atty.oen.i1st. and do not include faclulles what, primary
rly an No. INW-1110. purpose to the treatment of I notionally
Welfare State At Y.a~•1lTR No. H-101,111 children, Op. or mentaly wn
The rtmentlof responsibilities
a Deb
re (Sections 42.003 to 42.020 reserved for expansion)
Lithe SUBCHAPTER B. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
are + § 42.021. Division Dempated
ess (a) The department shall designate a division within the depart-
in ment to regulate and license child-care facilities and child-placing
agencies. The division shall enforce the provisions of this chapter
;des and the rules and standards adopted by the department under this
It. chapter and shall carry out other responsibilities the department may
rds, delopte or "Sip.
81
maim
§ 42.024 HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Title 2
§ 42.024. Adminlstmthv Procedure
The Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act (Article
6252-13a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) applies to all procedures
under this chapter except where it is contrary to or inconsistent with
the provisions of this chapter.
Historical Note
Prar law:
Arts 1073, 64th Lea•, P. 2116, ch. 101, 1 20.
VernoWs Ann.Ctv.sl. art. 05a-2. 1 20.
(Sections 42.026 to 42.040 reserved for expansion]
SUBCHAPTER C. REGULATION OF CHILD-CARE
FACILITIES
§ 42.041. Required License
44 6 (a) No person may operate a child-care facility or child-placing
U aw t N d e agency without a license issued by the division.
(b) This section does not apply to:
(1) a state-operated facility;
4 u L~J (2) an agency home;
(3) a facility that is operated in connection with a shopping
center, business, religious organization, or establishment where
children are cared for during short periods while parents or per-
sons responsible for the children are attending religious services,
shopping, or engaging in other activities on or near the premises,
including but not limited to retreats or classes for religious in-
struction;
(4) a school or class for religious instruction that does not
last longer than two weeks and Is conducted by a religious organ-
ization during the summer months;
(5) a youth camp licensed by the Texas Department of
Health;
(6) a hospital licensed by the Texas Department of Mental
Health and Mental Retardation or the Texas Department of
Health ;
(7) an educational facility accredited by the Central Educa-
tion Agency or the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
that operates primarily for educational purposes In grades kin-
dergarten and above;
90
Ch. 42 CHILD-CARE FACILITIES § 42.041
(8) an educational facility that operates solely for eduzation-
al purposes in grades kindergarten through at least grade two,
that does not provide custodial care for more than one hour dur-
ing the hours before or after the customary school day, and that
is a member of an organization that promulgates, publishes, and
requires compliance with health, safety, fire, and sanitation stan-
dards equal to standards required by state, municipal, and county
codes;
(9) a kindergarten or preschool educational program that is
operated as part of a public school or a priva`e school accredited
by the Central Education Agency, that offers educational pro-
grams through grade six, and that does not provide custodial
care during the hours before or after the customary school day;
and
(10) a registered family home.
(c) A single license that lists addresses and the appropriate facil-
ities may be issued to a child-care institution that operates noncontig-
uous facilities that are nearby and that are demonstrably a single op-
eration as indicated by patterns of staffing, finance, administrative
supervision, and programs.
Historical Note
prier law,
Acts 1111, 46th l.ea . P. 664. Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 695c. 1 800.
Acts 1141, 47th Lea., p• 116. 562, 1 1. subs". 3.
Acts 1149, list Lelt•, p. 143, ch. 401, 1 1. Acts 1971, 64th Let.. p. 1142, ch. 706, 11 4.
Acts 1965, 69th Let., p. 1444, ch. 511, 1 1. le.
Acts 1076, 64th Ulf.. P. 1171, ah. 476. 1 6d. Vernon's Ann.Civ.9t, art. 6959-3, 1 4.
Croaa Refereeces
Adoption, nee V.T.C.A. }'amlly Code, 116.1)1 et m;.
Lilly nursery for care and custody of children. lWensure slid regulation, twe Vrrnon's
Ann.Civ.St, art, 4442x.
Ubruy Refer"M
Asylums and Institutional Can Facllitlea C.J.S. .AAsylurrns and Institutional Cara
'r'2'
inlanu dptt, 11.4. Facilities II 1 to 1.
C.F.S. Infanta If 6, 9.
N" of Da44falom
In genital t t. Validity as prior laws
Actions and proce4dinge r Former Vernon's Ann.CIY.SL art. 6419-1
Duration of IttMSa S (now, this chapter), did not violate First
Facilities net nqulring IINnN 4 Amendment guarantee of fief exercise of
Facnitlee requiring license 2 religion. Oxford v. Hilt (Civ.ADp.1177) 661
Munlelpalitlu' lltenah:g authority ` e.wA~. 667. rel. n. r. e.
Validity of prior laws t
1. In general
Seta Hoard of Control, Dlvis:o' of Child
Welfare, cannot [awfully withhold lu ap-
81.
MUMM RIMURM DRPARTMSNT 942.041
Tltk 2 juk
it gover- flee to t.,,~,rc need, children, but if it moot f.om the federal government OP.
T-=
Cho" red b~ 15 kP&wteW'1* s=bAttY.Cen.1983, No. itPf-ESE
cou
0 41.021. Foster Care Payments
profit (a) The department may pay the coat of protective foster care for children:
•ineome
person (1) for whom the department has Wtiated a suit and has been named
managing conservator by a court orler issned under'Title 2, Family Code;
and
ramp,! (2) who are inelials for foster cap,, payments under the department's so
to families with dependent children program.
fund [See noein volume for tart of (b) and (0)]
receive
Amended by Acts 1981, 67th Fag., p. 2564, ch. 881, i 1, eft. June 18, 19E 1.
i V.T.CL rtimer Code, a ll.ol st Mq.
i991 AnenbaaaL In subd OXI) subeti•
toted ' tk 2. rWaY Code" far "Artkk
for 15.02. Family Code, as amaoW'.
o: this
by CHAPTER 42. REGULATION OF CHILD-CARS FACILITIES
fede►al
Section 42.001. Purpose
federal taw 1Rntew Coaase*tariee
Ames! sous of Texss taw: Conserva-
torship. Ellen K Sokoder, 36 5outhwn-
ter. (Tex.) 167 (1984
1142.002. Definitions
In this chapter.
[Set main rolanv for W1 of (1) to (14)J
relin
(15) "Religious organisation" means a church, ynagothe , propagation or other
of
gious institution whose purpose is to support and
truly held :eligious beliefs.
Amended by Acts 1981, 87th Leg., p. 2812, eh. 759, 4 1, eft. Aug. 31, 1981.
1981 AenenrmenL Added aubd. (14
to with 0 42.041. Required License
to [Ste main volume for Uzi of (a))
not (b) Thia section does not apply to'.
tend by
the (i) a state-opersted facility;
1W (2) an agency home;
(8) a facility that to operated In connection with a shopping center, boar
ness, religious organiudo4, or establishment where children are cared for
during short periods while parents or persons responsible for the children
are attending reus servioes, sboyplag, or eaga9wg in other activities on
this or new tM to this m , including but not limited to retreats or classes for
to tM religious instruction;
bond: (4) a school or class for religiotu instruction that does not Wt loader than
g+ two weeks &M is conducted by ti religiose organsation daring tbf summer
qtr Months;
16
6 42.041 HUMAN RESOURCES LSPARTMBNT
TH1e ! "Lit 2
(3) a youth camp licensed by the Texas Department of Health; 0 43.0
(6) a hospital licensed by the Texas Department of Mental Health and Crow
Mental Retardation or the Texas Department of Health; EXeF
(7) an educational facility accredited by the Central Education Agency under
the Southern Association of Col;eges and Schools that operates primarily i
educational purposes in grades kindergarten and above; 0 421
(S} sn eduational {st9lity 11•at operates solely !or eduatioa;l purposes ie
grades kindergarten through :t least grade two, that does nut provide
;t4ty odiaomary SchooYoun(
s, publisCount
tation stAmem
Guiles; 1981
(9) a kindergart..d or preschool aducational program that is oiLrated m
eat of a pu be school or a privatt: school accredited by the Central 0 4! t
utration Agency, that offers educational programs through grade six, and
that does not provide custodial care durlttii the hours before or after the e
cu.)Wmary.►•hool day; ~
(10) a registered family home; or time
(11) an educatlorW facility that is integral to sad Inseparable from its
than
sponsorin
religious organization or an educational facility both of which do static
not provide custodial care for more than two hours maximum per day, sad HOW
that offer educational programs for children age five and above In one or and
more of the following: kindergarten through at least grade three, elementa-
ry, or Secondary grades. {
exter
(See main volume for text of (C) l the 'i
be
(d) A person operating or desiring to operate a childcare facility that is pro t
exeir.nt from the provisions of Subsection (a) of this section may apply to the with division for a license as provided in Section 42.046 of this code. The division
may
not deny an exempt faet7ity a license on the ground that It is exempt from Amei
Subsection (a) of this section. A facility exempt from the provisions of Subset Of
tion (a) of this section that desires to receive or participate to federal or state tin"
funding shall be required to amply with all other pro'isions of this Act sad with sec, t
all regulations promulgated thereunder.
(e) The exemptions provided by Subsection (b) of this section do not affect 1 43
the authority of local, regional, or state health department officials, the state fire
marabsl, or local fire prevention officials to inspect childcare facilities.
Attended by Acts 1961, 67th Leg., p. 28M ch. 759, 0 2.8, eft. Aag. 81, 1991. a fat
atww
llal Anaidneent In subset. (b), subd. sabo toted ' ; or" for a pe" and added certir
(9), deleted "sod" at *i sad, in subd (10) subd. V tk added subsets. (d) and (e>
! 43.013. Reeords Ame
(See matt volume f(+ (eri of (a) and (b)1 19
(c) If a chgd-plae(mg agency terminates operation as a "placing agency, for'
It shall, after giving notice to the department, transfer its filet sad records
concerning adopted children, their biobglcal :arriil{es, and their n;optlve !amides 14:
to the department or to a facility licensed by the departrout to place ehldne for Lath
"Option. Ai
Amended by Acts 1963, 6" Leg., p. 179$ ch. 84 12, Off. Jas. 1, 1961. tots
tern
llbl Aaaes>iaieat Added aubeee. (e).
18
i j i . 1 u (1 ,•t S J' ~~r.. } u,,} "~re' .i ..t i~~ !('l~° t M ( 7 9 5 b r; Std'
P i A Minuted
January 21 1985
Page 10
gutter along Avenue B; developer has requested a waiver
of these requirements, Development Review Committee
maintains tha: in.pcovements should be provided at time
of development and recommends approval of preliminary
plat w!-pout requested waiver. On question, Mr. Clack
said that Punning and Zoning Commission can either
waive or postpone requirements, but he recommends that
street be built at this time.
Mr. LaPorte moved to approve the preliminary plat
without requested waiver. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and
unanimously carried (6-0).
B. Approval of final plat of the Burke-Saunders Addition.
At, Persaud advised that since preliminary plat was
approved without requested waiver of perimeter street
p%vinq improvements, final plat cannot be approved as
engineering plans will be required.
Mr. LaPorte moved to table the final plat of the
Burka-Saunders Addition, Seconded by Ms. Cole and
unanimously carried (6-0).
C. Recommend approval of request for water service outside
Denton city limits, at Highway 380 East and Geasling
Road, by Capricorn Mobile Home Park and related oversize
participation agreement.
Mr. Ellison advised that the City Council has instructed
staff to proceed with annexation of that portion of the
property outside the city limits. He said proposal is
to Pxpand existing mobile home park and request is for
water extension to serve the mobile hone park. Public
Utilities Board has recommended approval.
Mr. Rumfield said there is nothing out there now, that
the utilities department is recommending extension of
water line,
Mr. Ciaibone moved to recommend approval of water
service to Capricorn Mobile Hme Park and related
oversize participation agreement. Seconded by
Mr. LaPorte and unanimously carried (6-0).
D. laecommend approval of an ordinance amending Article 12
of kppendix a - Zoning of the Code of ordinances to
provide for an amended definition of 'Kindergarten or
Nursery', declaring all existing kindergarter or nursery
facilities legal uses; and providing for an stfective
date.
Mc. Morris advised that s~:ne churches in the city do
not have s ecifio use permits for nursery or kinder-
garten facilities and the City Council desires to make
those currently existing uses legal uses, In order to
accomplish this, &Anption of an ordinance is necessary,
Thin ordinance ameada definition of a "kindergarten or
nursery' as one for which a person is required to obtain
a license from the texas Department of Human Resources,
The ordinance also will make those uses existing on the
eff n tive date of the ordinance lawful uses,
Mr. Ellison said that churches had considered dal Caro
facilities as accessory uses to church and it had been
city policy in the past not to require specific use
permits. On question, Mc, Morris said that churches
in the future will be required to obtain specific use
permits if they meat the definition of 'kindergarten
or nursery'.
. 7 7Y'
a U p v
1uP4Y, n- t v 1 w f
P i a minutes
Januar 2, 1985
Page 11
• Chairman asked if registered family homes would be
required to have specific use permits. Mr, Morris said
that if a license from the state to required, a a nific
use permit is required, He said there are several types
defined by state law and this ordinance is based on
state law,
Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of an ordinance
amending Articl9 12 of Appendix 8 - Zoning of the Code
of Ordinances to provide for an amended definition of
"Kindergarten or nursery, declaring all existing kin-
dergarten or nursery facilitiea legal uses: and pro-
viding for an effective date. Seconded by Mr. Larorta
and carried (5-1). Mr. Claiborne vote6 no.
On further question from Chairman, Mr. Morrie read defi-
nition In the state law of 'registered fatly home' as a
facility providing care in the caretaker's own residence
for not more than six children under 14 years of age and
advised that a registered family home does not require a
license from the state.
Chairman Claiborne changed hie vote to 'aye' since
a specific use permit would not be required for a
registered family home'.
E, Discussion of proposed specific use permit ordinance.
Mr. Morrie advised that this draft for discussion sets
forth conditions that have to be met before a specific
use permit can be approved, allocates a $1,000 fine for
violation, and requires that actual development of prop-
erty be underway within one year. Hs said that the
existing ordinance has problems, that it was found to
be unconstitutional during a recent court case involv-
ing group homes.
On question, he said he would like the $1,000 fine as
filing an injunction and going to court is very time
consuming.
Mr. Sidor asked purpose of last sentence under Article
10, A, 'No rezoning request for a district change shall
be denied on the basis that the request would be favor-
ably received if reapplication was made for a specific
use permit.' It was consensus that that sentence be
deleted as it serves no useful purpose.
P. Discussion of proposed planned development ordinance.
Mr. Ell.son said he felt that Steve Panning should be
present for this discussion and suggested that item be
postponed to next meeting, Commission concurred,
Mr. LaPo2te referred to the Avondale Addition and questioned
whether the city has any ordinances to prevent the situation at
Churchill and t+ottingham where a hole was dug, where dirt was
piled on the c4rb which tears dswn the curb, and where use of
heavy equipment breaks down the street. He said he did not feel
the whole city should have to pay for what one developer does.
He asked Mr, Morris if the city has laws that make this sort of
thing illegal and if to who enforces?
Meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
v r ~Y' ' n er 1 „ Y
+ M~i. l j!'} Nr 'WIMP ! 1 i3 r :3 A 4F F A t ~ 1 f ,e y p ' ~ J ! l
NQ.
A'V ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF KATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHER AS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
Nat, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and city ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager of a designated employee has
reviewed and recomunded that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials equipment, supplies
or services as shown in the "bid Proposalsl' submitted therefor,
and
WUZREAS, the City Council has to in the City Budget
for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of
the saterials, equipmnt, supplies or services approved and
accepted herein; and
WHERE&S, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code if Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expeauitures of sore than
$3,000; sad
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinsace;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
materialsA equip swat supplies, or services, shown io the "Did
Proposals attached s:sUto, are hereby accepted and approved as
being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BID NUMBER ITEM N0. VENDOA AMOUNT
9312 l Kuhlmann Corporation $233,242.00
9385 1 Nl9~y Mschlnary 21, 500
9402 I Cumins Utility Products 27,532.11
rr~r~
SECTION That by Ili
the acceptance and approval of the above nuaberej
items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the torso, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the lid Iavitations, Bid
proposals, and rdistod doeurenta,
PAGE 1
r F i,rt w'; ' J".f r '.i1 p2P J. F i-n e
~11~A 17 } S 'tl y~yp w:.i 1 c f Y e ,f :9~'W~ ~ ~ r I ~ yyu 1. i
s. tle
SECTION III.
That should the City and persons submitting approved and
accepted items and of the submitted Lids wish to entor into a
formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, .pproval,
and awarding of the bide, the City Manager or his designated
representative is hereby authorised to execute the written
contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the
written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums
contained in the Did Proposal and related bid documents herein
approved and accepted.
SECTION YV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bide the City Council hereby authorises
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract made pursuant thereto as #uthorised herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this _l9 day of February , 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLUM ALLEN CM 9==
CITY OP DENTON,9TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Ot DENTON, TEXAS
all
PAGE 2
k a R i
q i 7 N e Y rb =~Ee.~1. Y'VV 711
DATE: 2-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM., G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19372 POWER TRANSFORMER
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Kuhlman at the low
alternate bid of $233,242.00, Fob Denton, delivery in
210 days ARO, with performance bond and contract.
SUMMARY: This large Power Transformer is for the Electric Utility
Department and was sent to several prospective vendors.
We received seven bids and three alternates. The best
alternate price is the one we feel is the best buy for the
City of Centon.
BACKGROUND: GROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Utility Department Recommendation
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Utility Electric Department
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
IteSpe l *s m ted:
e
City Manager
;pa ed by:
o n J, MarsC.P.N.
TiPurchasing Agent
A oved:
a e o Marshall, C,P.M.
Tit Purchasing Agent
riu P_ 9312
SID TITLE POWER TRANSFORMER WESCO PiIESTER KUHLMAN ASEA HEVI DUTY GENERAL BUTLER
OPENED_ January 17, 1985 2 p.m. ELECTRIC ELECTRIC LAND
ACCOUNT f _
Tye T 0 VENDO VENDX+ ENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 Power Transformer 283 750.00 371j616-.00 277.130.00 274,470.00 350j290.00 313j659.00 494,845.00
Alternate 233,242.00 2880373.00 479896.00
Deliver 2 Weeks_ 210-Days 21~_Days 140 D s 33 Days
33 Wks Aug 198S
-25 Weeks ARO 10/85
Fob Denton Denton Dentot Denton Enton Denton Denton
Siding
Model Westinghouse McGraw Kuhlman RTE D GE Federal
alb ci-`-
L-1- J-
j }~i2rw ,.n fiJf" it y+34',~:. >`5 i+ i n• ~d4 r
v ~w a~ rx r. , e" u. y 17.
Public Utility Board Minutes
February 6, 1984
Page 5
10. CONSIDER PARTICIPATION IN THE WATER SHED ENVIRON14ENTAL
A( ECESSSMERT STUD WITH NORTH CENT RA S U L 0
GOVERNMENT AND SIXRETRO PLE UTILITIES,
Mr. Nelson informed the Board that it was North Central
Texas COG Committee recommendation that the study of the
water shed be done of the seven cities involved (Denton,
Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington, Tarrant County, Municipal
Utilities District, North Texas Municipal Utilities
District, Texas River Authority) had agreed to help fund
the project and the North Texas Central COG has provided
one half the funding necessary for the project. The
project will be conducted over the next six to eight weeks.
The Board noticed that the City of Denton was sharing
equally within the cost of the project with cities and
utility districts with much greater resources and was not
sharing with other local governmental entities who may have
a concern in this same area.
Mr. Thompson made a motion to approve the participation and
recommend to the City Council entering into agreement for
the study. Me. Boyd seconded the motion, all "ayes" no
"nays", motion carried.
11. CONSIDER APPROVAL FOR PURCHASE OF A SPARE POWER TRANSFORMER
13NVANY6 i59-RG
Mr. Tullos informed the Board that the item was included in
the 1985-89 capital improvement plan. As item M/66-8 the
total cost of the purchase is $233,242 which is $116,758
under the projected cost of $350,000 budgeted for the
purchase.
The Board asked how many units this might backup. Mr.
Tullos suggested it would backup eight other units which
currently have no backup in the event of failure.
Me. Boyd made a motion to purchase the power transformer
from Kuhlman Power Specialty Transformer Division to be
paid from bond funds. Mr, Thompson seconded the motion,
all "ayes" no "nays", motion carried.
12. CONSIDER 1985 DEPARTMENT FORECAST
The staff did not have the documentation available and made
no recommendation at the present time.
The Board did ask that the staff list all assumption
included in the document and refer to additional sources in
researching particular population growth.
a ~.q„F„y z~. S'iti
TVI 77 T~7 7 '17 e. u 4 e's n11' P t 2 1 r i., i,J 77777
e q
7 't ' Y a Hi. 1 ,,;r w 1 r
T. r . t.
DATE: 2-19-85
CITY COUNCIL ROPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of t1le City Council
FROM: G, Cl:ris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19385 ASPHALT DISTRIBUTOR
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder,
Highway Machinery, for a Rosco Model RRH, Hydrostatic
Distributor, in the amount of 121,925.00.
SUI•IM AR Y: This bid is for the purchase of an asphalt distributor for
use by the Street Department in the maintenance of City
streets. It replaces a 1952 model distributor.
BACKGROUND= Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS DEPARVENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Street Department
FISCAL 114PACTs This unit will be funded thru the lease/purchase funding
of Motor Pool Equipment previously approved by Council.
Respe~fu y subm ted:
City Manager
Pr red b
age Torn 0. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
e ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M.
itie Purmsi ,y Agent
riu 935 -
1ID TITLE ASPHALT DISTRIBUTOR
OPENED PLAINS NICHOLS HIGHWAY
January 17, 14A~+ 2 n CHINERY MACHINERY MACHINERY
ACCOUNT / 0. CO. CO.
TY~ VENDOR -VENDOR --VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
--Asphalt Distributor -N /B 28s637.00 27 925.00
Make Etn re Rosco RRH
Delivery 30 Days ODa Ys
After After
Rec i t of Recei t of
Truck Truck
DATBt 2-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of t1te City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19402 MISC. ELECTRICAL HARDWARE
RECOMMENDATION: Na recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, Cummins
Utility Products, in the total amount of $27,532.77 with delivery
in 30 days, Fob Denton.
SUNK AR Y: This material is for the installation of the 69KV electric
transmission line being installed to serve the proposed
Texas Instruments plant and-surrouniing area.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet of Bids.
PROGRAMS, DEPAR'DirsNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electrical Distribution
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds Electrical Distribution Department
Work Order 5825 and work Order 5824
Respectfully subs ted:
• 1
City Manager
P ral-aii
red :n
.17 N~
Hall" Title Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
App ed:
irsf, Marshall, C,P,N,
1 t1e urchasing AGent
9409,
BID TITLE_ MISC. ELECTRICAL HARDWARE
CUMMINS TEMPLE KRIZ- NELSON PRIESTER POLELINE ESCO
OPENED February 19, 19A5 9 P,m SUPPLY DAVIS
ACCOUNT /
TY~ _ I-TEH EDESCRIPTION - VENDOR VENDO VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR _
5 7 28 348.14 28 595.13 29 354.07 30L1376.55 NB N8
for Texas Instruments
69 KV Installation
Deliver 30 Days 42 Da s 45 DAys 35 DAys 60 Days
-Jet 30 Net 30
' Net 30 Net 30 Net 0
T q r Rh c. 0. y 1 W q 1 v .c
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING J$OR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS: PROVIDING
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR: AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive lids for the construction of public works or improve-
moats in accordance with the procedures of state law and City
ordinanes; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
received and rerostmended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals
and plane and specifications therefore; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
W48EREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
ON~WAATTHEAEYORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY
SECTION I.
That the following competitive bide for the construction of
public works or taprovaments, as described in the "BSd Invita-
tioas", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached
hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest
responsible bidet
BID NUMBER CONTU.CTOR ANOINT
_ 9391 010trson Consen,Ction Company $512,097.00
9314 _Ilorrell 6 Associates. Inc. $0,301.26
.-.9314 Wow Cswiopnent Cory. $ 26,726.38
SECTION It.
That the acceptance and approval of the above competititve
bids shall not ct.`stitute a contract between the City and the
r s r,,. ~TMi.' }"i '[•i~` M[ ✓ „w r f °"r ]i ) ~J '~~•R' y. c'.:.
r
person submitting the bid for- construction of such public works
or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person
shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to
Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and
furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification
of the award of the bid.
SECTION III.
That the City Manager is hereby authorised to sxcecute all
necessary written contracts for the performance of the
constriction of the public works or improvements in accordance
with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such
contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and
Sid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the
terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards,
quantitites and specified suss contained therein.
i SECTION IV,
That upon acceptance and approval of the ibove competitive
bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and
improvements as authorised herein, the City Council hereby
authorises the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
amount as specified in such approved bids and authorised
contracts executed pursuant thereto.
SUCTION V.
That this ordinance shall become affective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19 day of fsbrvsry , 199 ,
RMMM 0.
KAYOK
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST.,
CITY 01► DENTON,'TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORMr
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
SA~W
F 1 F P"'
tl n k`' v ! Y.' t tl 11 Y':. J.
DATB: 2-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G, Cliris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9391 LOOP 288 WATERLINE
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low qualifying bid
of Dickerson Construction Company for $512,097.00.
SUMM AR Y: This bid is for the construction of waterlines in the
area of North Loop 288 and needs to be constructed well
in advance of other construction in that area. '
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet of Bids '
PROGRAMS. DEPARVENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Utilities.Department and the Construction of North
Loop 288 - The Area Development
FISCAL 114PACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Respectfully sub M ttad:
4 ff-,MW*
City Manager
iPre ared ;
W16 A V_ J Harshall, C.P.M.
tie urchasing Agent
Approved: "
n Marshall, C.P.H.
Ti le rchasing AGent
BID 1_ 93Q1
i
BID__ _ LOOP 288 RATER INE
OPEN January 22, 1905 JAY-IYIR EU1 CREEK J.L. BEN SIRA OSCAR ATKINS CALVERT C 1 U DICKERSUN
2 o r CORP. CONST. BERTRAH RENDA BROSI PAYING UTILITY MIST.
ACCOUNT t 623-008-0461-9111 CO. B ERG' EQUIPfERT CO.
INC. CO.
i
ITEM UM"ION VENDOR VENDOR VER5017- VENDOR
VENDOR
-TOM VINOW VENDOR IVENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
i
Cowlele Bid-All item 534,%0,00 619,04-4 231,927.7 IM-199- SM. I&A Alt. Ala 36
2 Alternate 61300100 --2.800. - 4,811.s
r
Emma
4,
2 ~ Y 1 V l !"1 ins' t ♦ Y 7 \ 41 7' 5 ~ 1 I
DA7T,S'- 2-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SU BJ ECTI BID !9314 STREET PARTICIPATION - WORRELL A ASSOCIATES, INC.
RECOMMENDATION: This recommendation is for the approval of extra width and depth
of development on Old North Road and Windsor Drive, Northwood
Addition. This is for 9th and 10th for the amount of $32,728.72
and ;17,572.56 for the total of $50,301.28.
SUI4M AR Y: This is for the participation of street extra width and
depth on Windsor Drive and Old North Road, ,Northwood Addition.
The amounts per square yard etc. are from ;,ur bfd /9314
for Street Participation. This has been reviewed by Public
Works and Engineering.
BACKGROUND: Participation statements and drawings, with cover lettei
from Warrell & Associates, Inc. ,
PROGRAMS, DEPAR'RIIiNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Public Works, Development of Additions where extra street
width and depths are deemed necessary.
FISCAL 114PACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Respectfully submitted:
City Manager
P are n y rs al .M.
it1 Purchasing Agent
A roved "
M n Marshall, C.P.M.
itl Purchasing Agent
I',, Y411
r v
%
'Jr C
• WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
engineers 0 plonners
November 19, 984
Mr. Jerry Clark
CITY OF DENTON
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76701
RE: Northwood Addition 9th Installment; paving cost participation
by City of Denton.
Our File - 7944
Dear Mr. Clark:
We have computed the extent of City participation in tie cost of
paving Northwood Addition 9th Installment based on Augi.st, 1984
bids for paving Audra Estates supplied by Field 6 Edwaris. The
total reimbursement comes to $32,728.72 (see attached s:etch and
Itemization).
If you have any questions or require additional imformat'on, please
feel free to call,
Sincerely,
WOR ASS IATES, INC.
Ro Ro erson
Projec Engineer
RB:S
Enclosure
15619 hoffoood Stood
Suite 500
DGM%. Tow% 75234
2141934-3104
1 1 111Y -^.41
y'h i p 4 v 3. Y rt 'r r
r .•z r~4~ i
_ r t
CLIENT Doyle Conine
PROJECT NUMBER .7944
• WORRELL b ASSOCIATES a NAME Northwood 9
e~gineea • ptonnen
13619 Inwood Rood BY RLR DATE 11'.1.9 84
suite 300 PAGE OF
Dollos. Texas 75234
2141934.3104
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
vmmmm~
.TEM DESCRIPTION
e OTY, UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
CITY REIMBURSEMENTS
Windsor Drive:
Excess width (451) 1428.1 SY 11.04 l5 767.23
Excess Thickness 6" 4414.41 SY 1.84 81122,51L
Old North Road:
Excess Width 41' 442.45 Sy 11.04 ' 4,884.70
Excess Thickness 6" 2149.06 SY 1.84 3t954-28
TOTAL REIMBURSEMENTS: $ 32,728.72
*Based on August Bid Prices for Audra Estates Supplied
b Field & Edwards
N ~ f ♦ ,Y L~ 4.~ . J
~~Y--!! m, " ~ ♦ti era ' zt~~ /y►~t ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ` " F
V'
$MEET NO. or
13619 l wood Road Suite 300 DATE
DALLAS. TEXAS 75234 cALtu►Atro ev
(214) 934.3104 CHECKED BY OATI
6CALE ttr
I I ~ ,
; a
I ,
11 1 A-
«
i 417t,
,
2
,
I
r
a
llo~
.
; e I I
I
i
I
Ott
f I f
Wl"TIltr
'e r f-r ♦ a -0'~~♦ rt i vxA ~7'.nc. e,xr. oy -ry^*Z agr,,.1„L. k i s v v" r > r r f 3 f.
a r
CITYo/OENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 4, 1984
TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FROM: David Salmon, Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: City Participation for Northwood Addition, 9th and
10th Installments
Checkmate Development is the developer for Northwood Addition,
9th and 10th installments. The cost of participation by the
City fce these projects is as follows:
Description Quantity Price Amount
Northwood IX:
Windsor Drive
Excess Width (45') 1428.19 SY $11.04/SY $15,767.23
Excess Thickness (0) 4414.41 SY $1.84/SY 81122.51
Old North Road
Excess Width (411) 442.45 SY $11.04/SY 41884.70
Excess Thickness (6") 2149.06 SY $1.84/SY 3,954.28
TOTAL ,
Northwood X:
Old North Road
Excess Width
(55' of 441) 61.11 SY, $11.04/SY $ 674,65
Excess Width
(435' of 411) 338.33 SY $11.04/SY $ 30735,16
Excess Width
(105' of Transition) 99.17 SY $11.04/SY $ 19094.84
Excess Wid'.n
(7' of Buk Culvert?, 33.05 CY $240.00/CY 7,932.00
Excess Thickness (6 ) 2247.78 SY $1.84/SY 41l35,92
TOTAL 1179572-76
These figures are correct to the best of my knowledge. Please
present them to the City Council for City participation in
these projects.
David Salmon
Civil Engineer
00269E
r~ W ~ r^ ♦e m i ~.p Ati Y .fix s E VGo-y h ! i. w 1 .'3
DATE: 2-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO$ Mayor and Members of tltie City Council
FROM:, G. Cliris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19314 STREET PARTICIPATION - WESTON DEVELOPMENT CORP.
R BCOM EN DATION: We recommend this participation be approved to Weston
Development Corp. for Phases II, IV, and Y for the
estimated amount of $26,726.38.
SU14M AR Y: This is for the estra width and depth of Mockingbird and
Audra Lane in connection with Weston development Corp.
Belaire Phase II, IV* and Y. The estimated quantities
in the total amount of $26,726.38.
BAC KdROUN D: Estimates, participation letter, and prices are
established from Bid 19314 low bidder - participation
bid.
PROGRAMS, DBPAR'DIRNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Public works, where development requires or would require
heavier and wider streets as development dictates.
FISCAL IM FACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Reaf y0 s t ed:
G. Curls 11aftUng
City Manager
Pr re y: '
it! n . Marshall, C.P.M.
Purchasing Agent
Act
ore e+ n Marshall, C, P.M.
ti Purchasing Agent
,.m
s
k
C/T1~0/DENTM,TEX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566.8200
The City of Denton has established a Participation Policy, with the bid
established price. In accordance with that policy and referencing Bid 193149
the following participation has been agreed to by the Public Works/Engineering
and Purchasing Departments.
The participation is for streets between Weston Development Corp., the
developer, and the City of Denton, Texas. The work is being done by
Jagoe Public Co. of Denton.
The participation quantities and prices have been approved as per the
approximate quantities shown on the attached sheet.
Approved by,
C
hn rshall, C.P.M. Ter & la k, P.E.
C/Purch"ing Agent Cit Engi r
JJM:bw
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT DIPW METRO 267.0042
~.rr
Bellaire Phase 1I
Mockingbird Lane
Paving Extra Width 476.00 SY
Transitions 78.00 SY
Total Phase It 554.00 SY @ 13.09 = 7,251.86
Bellaire Phase IV
F-bck.in.tbird Lane
Paving Extra Width 290.89 SY
Transition 39.00 SY
Audra Lane
Paving Extra width 477.07 SY
Transition 39.00 SY
Tota'i Phase 1V 845.96 SY @ 13.09 • 11,073.62
Bellaire Phase V
Mockingbird Lane
Paving Extra Width 602.78 SY
Transition 39.00 SY
Total Phase V 641.78 SY @ 13.09 = 8,400.90
Total Participation $26,726.38
J T t
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY
PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCOR-
DANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES
FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHZRZAS, state law requires that certain contracts requiring
an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding
$5,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of public
calamity whave it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate
money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve
the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the
public health of the citizens of the city, or in case of
unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and
WHIREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHZRZAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contractins of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, 'fIiEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HERESY
ORDAINSt
SECTION 1.
That the City Council hereby determines that there is a
public calamity that makes it necessary to act at aces to
appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the eitizeos, or
to preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public
health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforssen
damage to public property, aschinary or equipmwnt, and by reason
thoVeof, the following emergency purchases of materials,
equipment, supplies or servicea, as described in the "Purchase
Orders" attached herato, are hereby approved:
I. - 7 974-
Y ~;>qn S+tP • "9;,: r t te' nr>,'.Wy r•i r ~ r tx rte. ,..r r : w: a
I
I
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
66837 NtedermeverArttn $31.551,24
67026 AMP Special industries _ 1,16.256.00
SECTION it.
That because of such emergency, the City Manager or
designated employes is hereby authorised to purchase the
eaterials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the
attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the
amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in
accordance with the provisions of state law exampting such
purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids.
SECTION III_
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19 day of February 1986 ,
RICHARD Oo bUWAKTj MAY
CITY Of DENTON, TLXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OP DENTON,,TtXAB
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORNt
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OP DtNM, MW
BYs
PACE 2
DATE: 2-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G, Cliris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJ SCT: PURCHASE ORDER 166837 NIEDERMEYERr MARTIN
RECOMMENDATION: Martrecommend he this
amount order
of $31,551.243 bet approved asean
emergency purchase.
SUI4M AR Y: Niedermeyer -Marting has been the successful low bidder
ont he last three acquisitions of transmission poles.
BACKGROUND: Due to a drastic update in the relocation of the transmission
line schedule for the Texas Instrument Project, we are
forced to bypass the bidding procedure for these poles.'
Normal delivery is 6 to 8 weeks.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; i Electrical Di$tribution and the Texas Instruments Project
FISCAL I14PACT: 1984-85 Budget Fudns Account 1611-098-0252-9214
Capital Improvements Transmission System Poles 5
Fixtures
Respe ful su wl tedt
•
U. C11rif Hartung
City Manager
Pre ad b
Home Tom Shaw, - .
Title Assistant Purchasing Agent
ov t
ste n liarshali, C,P,M,
tle Purchasing Agent
.ft e x V 'I .a t 6 . t , a ,xc 1, r
"TIRMW
21S E M~IQNNEY ST. QROER. DENTON, TX 721201
P. 0. NUMBER DATEAMIDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYF
iegT olde3O/W CIO s
141N90.01 :
VENDOR: SHIP TO:
NIEDERMETER MMTIN CO.. COWSI1MATION °OM V .
1727 •N.E• ELEVENTM .AVE. DO INOT DUPLICATE
PORTLAMD9 OR 97212
ITEM AMOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUR
011611;006 023! 9214 ' 30 . 49"" TlW i WILITT .NO1s9293 - 26►077•TO
02 011 : 000 0252 9214! 0 490'410 'SWI : M- ITV POLE . 6"73. E4
TOTAL . POA -P.O • 31 • ss l • 24
The My of Dorton, Tu" Is tax mmpt • Hftm BIII No. X
R~f.r.no. P.O. NwAm on all K SMpmmb and Irw~oloa.
Shipmmb ah FA L City of Dorton, or as Indla#•d. TOc
CRY of Aamunb Pay" John J. Momhdl O.P.M Pu~chmkrlq Ap t
218 E McVJmW 8t., Damon, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, O.P.M. AW. Knha*q A"M
Photo 11M611d't23 817182!68311 DIM MsW 20740Q
The Ofty of Dorton Is m"opportunity umploW
DATE: 2-19-'85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of tl:e City Council
FROM: G. Ci:ris Hartung, City !tanager
SUBJECT: PURCK.SE ORDER 167026 AMP SPECIAL INDUSTRIES
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order to AMP Special Industries
in the amount of $16,255.00 be approved as an emergency
purchase.
SUMM AR Y: AMP Special Industries is the only supplier of these
special connections.
BACKGROUND: The rescheduling of the time allotment to relocate the
69KY transmission line for the Texas Instruments project,
has forced us to request this emergency purchase.
PROGRAMS, DEPAR'1?TENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED.
Electric Distribution and the Texas Instruments Project
FISCAL 1I4PACT: These connectors will be funded thru working capital and
charged to the project as they are used.
Account #710-004-0598-8708
Resper-LE y s ttedis
City Manager
Pr ared
Name Title Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approvedt „
y
e VO)A or J~ Marshall, C.P,M.
rchasing Agent
4 fM, ~ r.. S. Y F }
216 E MoKINNEY ST. PUA HAW ORDER DENTON TX Mot
MAUMBER DATVffl~oo. C02 DOCUMENT Tlf
y~ ppp AlOP49000
AW Q klA1.:11OMTRYES 8HI P T0:
11AREl10115!
1901 • HURD DR. CONFIANATION ONLY
I RVI W • TX . 75062 DO NOT DUPLICATE
ITEM ACCO 1NT NUMBER UNITS WUMBEii DEWNPTION BID NO. LNIE AMOUP
al 710 oor a59a a7oa 60 a,a~uP snooz-ow 3.030.00
0^s 710 004 0590 40i las Cow\',=OR -79oi-7n 4o48S.00
,03 710 004 0515 W" 1=i camwiL -eon Tli~s89 4.12S~o0
04 -710 004 05!5 'i70/ 75 COWIft 794"400 2*475600
05 710 -004 %so pN 76 ONN6CTQ,;t.-"*-L0 20475.00
06 T10'.004 A%95 Was 1 LIST rft`94aa , 25000
The City of Denton, Twm is 'arc NW* . HOUSO BNI No. 20. ' TOTAL r Poo. 16,253.00
PAII&W a P.O. Number on all I V1.4 8Npo em, and kwotoer.
BNpmrMe NO F.O.S. Clty of 0 YAW, Of as IndloatW.
MAW k"m • Tat N" AN b plrMer rik
CW of Denim, Am wft PMbir JOr n J. Mm"I, C.P.M. Purd"00 APP
2% 1~ MoKlnney Di nton, TX 70701 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. AUL Kffd*WAQ A"M
Phony 817188! OW 817!6068311 DIFW Metro W404
TM City of Drnton Is an aqua" oppodu ty whpl
February 19, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM!
f D,.
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consider Proposed Pro Rata and Oversize Agreement with
Greenway Plaza (Tony Raposa, Owner) and/or His Assigns, for
a new 12" Water Line from the Thunderbird Street South along
IH-3S Service Road to University Drive, Approximately 1900
Feet and Connecting to the Existing 12" Water Line on the
South Side of University Drive.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February 6,
1985, recommended to the Council approval of this oversizing
and pro rata agreement due to demand imposed by this and
other development requirements in this area in the near
future.
SUMMARY
At present there is insufficient water pressure and pipe
size to provide 1500 gallons per minute necessary for fire
flow for this commercial development site. A new water line
of at least 8" in size will be required to supply necessary
flow. Mr. Tony Raposa has been advised by the Utility
Department of the necessity to construct a 12" water line
for this and other developments that may be requesting water
service in the near future, and that the City may share in
the cost of oversizing and grant a pro rata agreement for
the off-site portion of this line. The Hogan and Rasor
study calls for a 36" water line; however, until the new
water plant is sited, this larger line may be routed in
another direction. (see Letter and maps, Exhibit I $ II).
I
BACKGROUND
An 8" water line will supply 1000 gallons per minute from
University Drive and the 6" existing water line on Colonial
Drive will supply 500 gallons per minute totaling 1S0P
gallons per minute. Minimum fire flow for this commercial
site is 1500 gallons per minute.
To provide for future growth in this area, a 12" line is
> required.
3467U:3
i 1
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Utility Department, Developer.
FISCAL IMPACT
Cost of this project would be as follows:
For a 12" water line 1900' x $25/LF $47,500
For an 8" Water Line 200' x $21.50/LF $ 41300
Bore underneath University Bldv. to
existing 12" water line-100' x $100/LF100
TOTAL COST OF PROJECT ,
Cost to Developer 2100' x $21.S0/LF
for 8" line 45,150
Bore under street 100' x $100/0 $10,000
TOTAL COST TO DEVELOPER TST-IM
COST TO CITY OF DENTON $ 6,650
(1900' x S-$21. S0) (12"-8" line)
Source of Funds: 623-008-0461-9138 Water Bond Funds
Respectfully subm tt4d:
•
G. M is ar un
City Manager
Prepared by:
Raymond Rumfield
Civil Engineer
APPROVED:
Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBITS I- Reply to Verbal Request of Greenway Plaza Addition
II- Location Map of Water Line
III- Water Line Oversize Agreement
IV- Water Line Pro Rata Agreement
V• Minutes of PUB Meeting of 1/9/8S
VI- Minutes of PUB Meeting of 2/6/8S
V- Ordinance
34S7U:4
h S, r ,r_ a a
10011,
I
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN
THE COST OF INSTALLING OVERSIZE WATERLINE FACILITIES; AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT- APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR A EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Denton wishes to enter into an agreement
to participate in the cost of providing oversized waterline
facilities which is in the best interests of the City; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000;
and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires every act of
the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the
contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby approves the "Waterline Oversize
Participation Agreement", attached hereto, to provide for the
city'a articipation in the cost of providing oversized waterline
facilities in accordance with said agreement and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
SECTION It.
That the City Council authorize the expenditure of funds in the
manner and amount as specified in the agreement.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1985.
RICHARD U. UTLWARI, MAYOR
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
tILTOTTL ALLIA,
CITY 5LEALTARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY1 a Zest
WA'T'ER LINE OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF DENTON KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT WHEREAS, Tony Raposa, d/b/a Greenway Plaza, 801 Sunset
Street, Denton, Texas 76201 and/or its assigns, is the Developer of
certain property shown on the attached map, which map is incorpo-
rated herein as if set forth in full, in the City of Denton, Denton
County, Texas, and further described as property on Colonial Drive,
Thunderbird Drive and IH-35 East Service Road, and the Developer
desires to serve such property with approximately 1,900 feet of
oversize water line facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires that such water facilities
be oversized and the City will participate in the additional cost of-
the oversized facilities pursuant to the provisions of the Denton
Development Code, Appendix A to the Code of Ordinances of the City
. of Denton, Texas;
NOW9 THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of
1985, by and between Tony Raposa, d/b/a Greenway Plaza, Denton,
Texas, hereinafter called "Developer", and the City of Denton,
Texas, A Home Rule municipal Corporation of the State of Texas,
hereinafter called "City";
WITNESSETH:
1, The Developer will install, by contract or otherwise, a 12"
water line and necessary appurtenances to serve the property
described on the attached map in accordance with all City of Denton
ordinances, rules, regulations, policies and procedures. The said
facilities shall be locatid as shown on the attached map which is
made a part hereof for all intents and purposes.
2s The City's share of the estimated cost of said facilities is
. $6,650 (1,9 L.F. X $25,00 - $21.50 . Upon completion of construc-
tion and acceptance by the City of said facilities, the actual cost
WAM LINE OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/TONY RAPOSA d/b/a GREEN-
in. Y i 'S n h.r
Y participation in said facilities shall be det'''mined
and certified to by the Director of Utilities, and his certificate
setting out the City's cost of said facilities shall be attached
. hereto and made a part hereof.
3. The City shall pay for its share of the facilities within
thirty (30) days from the date of accepte.nce of the facilities, or
under such terms and conditions that are mutually acceptable to the
parties.
4. Title to said facilities is hereby and shall at all times be
vested in the City.
5. The Developer shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and
hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability
of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third
person occasioned by any act or omission, ntglect or wrong- doing of
Developer, its officers, agents, employeea, invitees, contractors or
other persons with regard to the performance of this contract, and
Developer will, at its own cost and expense, defend and protect
against any and all such claims and demands.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed this
of day
1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TONY RAPOSA, d/b/a GREEWAY PLAZA
BY:
BY:
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM#
JOE MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYt `
WATEt 1Na OVERSfEB l'AttTiC1PATWAIN AGREEMENT/TONY RAPOSA d
WAY PLAZA-PACE2
/b/e GREEN-
WATER LINE PRO RATA AGREEMENT s
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF DENTON § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of ,
1985 by and between the City of Denton, a Municipal Corporation of
the County of Denton and the State of Texas, horeinafter referred to
as "City" and Tony Raposa, d/b/a Greenway Plaza and/or its assigns,
801 Sunset, Denton, Texas, 76201, or its assigns, hereinafter
referred to as "Owner".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Owner will install a water line from the City of
Denton's University Drive 12" existing line 1,120 feet offsite along
the east service road of IH-35 to Owner's development on the south
side of Thunderbird Drive to Colonial Drive; and
WHEREAS, in order to serve this development with water services,
Owner will be required to pay the cost of 1120 feet of offsite water
line and will extend such water line as described above pursuant to
the provisions in effect on the date of this Agreement of the Denton
Development Code,Appendix A to the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the Owner desires to receive reimbursement for such
cost under the provisions of said Denton Development Code of the
City of Denton, Texas;
NOW THCRLfORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants and agreements hereinafter provided, the parties hereto
agree as follows:
1
That for and in consideration of the construction of such off-
Fite water line extension for the benefit of Owner and the City, the
City agrees to reimburse Owner not to exceed his cost of construction
only of such offsite main extension the sum of $24,08040 (1120' off-
site X $21,50 p1m foot for 8" Aire lino under the provisions in
effect on the date of this Agreement of the Denton Development Code
of the City of Denton, Texas, as heretofore amended with the
Q 'Ow 8. wi i ati'oi~a;
A.'Reimbirs6ment costs will be verified by the Director of Util-
itis6 or his designee based on actual costs of offsite water line
construction as presentEd by the Owners.
• B. The reimbursement shall not apply to main extensions construc-
ted by the City of Denton or under its directions from any main
construction under the terms of this Agreement.
C. Reimbursement payments shall be made to the. Owner or their
assigns if written, and to no other person(s).
D. The reimbursement aforesaid shall be payable only from funds
received by the City pursuant to said Denton Development Code.
E. There shall be a maximum of twenty (20) years as the period
of eligibility wherein the original installer of the water line may
request reimbursement of pro rata payments under thin Agreement.
The period of eligibility shall begin as the date of final inspection
and acceptance of the extension by the City.
F. All pro rata fees incurred under the provisions of the Denton
Development Code shall be paid directly to the City and the City
shall transfer amounts due to owner within thirty (30) days of
receipt.
II.
That for and in consideration of the Agreements to be performed
by the City as aforesaid, Owner hereby transfers to the City all of
its rights, title and interest in and to the water line extension
S described above, and any and all easements and right of way agree-
ments secured by tLez for the purpose of locating said water line
extensions.
WITNESSETH the hands of the Parties hereto on the day and year
first above written.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TONY RAPOSA, d/b/a GREEWAY PLAZA
BY: BY: G. CHRIS HARTUNG
TONY RAPOSA
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST :
CHARLOWE ALLEN CITY SECRUM
CITY OF DENTON,9TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE MORRIS, ACTING CITY A'T'TORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
'YYl tr~ns.►
aY., ~
•
CITY OfDMON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BU(LDINO / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
December 21, 1984
cog Tony Raposa Realcore
801 Sunset Street V
Denton, Texas 76201
SUBJe Greenway Plaza at colonial Drive, Thunderbird Drive and I 35
Service Road
Dear Mr. Raposat
As per your request on December 20, 1984, concerning subject property,
the following information is providedo
A. At the present time, there is insufficient water pressure serving
this location of the City of Denton to provide 1500 gallons per
minute which is what commercial developsknts require according to
the Denton City Code of Ordinances. There is also a hefvily loaded
• sewer line on University Blvd, which would be receiving sewage from
this Greenway Plaza Development. The City of Denton is presently
designing two capital improvement projects for the elimination of
these two problems. A high-service pump will be placed at McKenna
Park tank which will boost the pressure in this area sufficient for
the fire flow required. In addition, a new sewer relief line is
being designed to carry sewage from University Blvd. on the
Westgate Hospital side of I 35 in another direction thereby
alleviating the overloaded saver line on University Blvd. which
this development would empty into. Both of these capital
improvement projects are scheduled for construction and completion
approximately June of 1985.
B. The development of Greenway Plaza shows only a 6" water lane which
would be insufficient for the 1500 qpm fire flow under the beat of
pressure conditions. It will, therefore, be necessary in order to
meet this fire flow requirement for the developer to install at
least an 8" _ av ter ling from University Blvd. approximately 1900' to
and across the frontage of this development and then connecting
into the existing 6" water line on Colonial Drive another 2001.
The City of Denton may wish to participate in the oversizing of the
8" water line from University Blvd. across the frontage of this
property 1900' to at least a 32" size. This would aid the City in
future tie ons for additional water service further north of this
development. The City may also give a_oro rata _agzemmt for any
off-site investment which is a return of monies to the original
• developer in the amount of $21.50/ft, for all offsite water lines,
Tony RaposatHAM
,r w4' r' <q i ~,»y,. r,
Page 2
• C. The cost of this water line would be as followst
For a 12" water line 19W x $25/ft. IN $47,500
For an 8" water line 200' :n $21.50/ft. Is 4,300
Bore underneath University Blvd. to tie in to existing
120 Y:ter line 100, x $100/ft 100000
Total cost of project $61,800
cost to developer would be 2100' x $21.50/ft $45,150
Bore under street 100, x $100/ft 10,000
Total cost to developer $559150
The iifference of these two prices would be the cost to the City
for oversiting, which is $ 6,650
In order to proceed with this development, the City of Denton would be
willing to give the go ahead along with the fire marshall provided the
water line was installed and beneficial occupancy did not take place
until after the high-service pump and the relief sewer line are
completed at an estimated date of June 1985. Engineering drawings will
be required for submittal prior to issuing the building permit.
I trust this information will be sufficient for you to proceed with your
• project.
Sincerely,
Dave Ham
Assistant Director of Utilities
Water/Wastewater Division
CDH:es
ccs Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities
Bob Haggeman, rice Marshall
Jerry Clark, City Engineer
Attachment:Map
•
Tony RaposaINAM
r ate` ~b'
wa
i n
j ~ •
+ ! T M
1
y ' 1 f
1 N ~ f
a
1 e
T
1
e
M .
1 1 1
1 ~ 1
/ ! 1 p1
O 1 1 I li
9 1
7 f f 1
I I ~ T
t11YM~* f f
v
• 1
Not=
` r
1 r•
r(+~ ~~\EfN~~Ay 7T
1Pa Tfo
,N1 ky
s
H + 'rs I
1
A ly
O 1 1N y { 1
T ` 1!1 1
d
MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
FEBRUARY 6, 1985 7:30 p.m.
City of Denton Service Center Training Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leonard Herring, Nancy Boyd, John Thompson,
R. E. Nelson
STAFF PRESENT: Ernie Tullos, David Ham, John McGrane,
Charles Cryan
OTHERS PRESENT: Greg Edwards, Edwards, Fields & Associates
Curtis Holly, Oakmont Estate Development
Alvin Copeland, Freeze & Nichols
Tony Raposa, Tony Raposa Realtors
ABSENT:
Meeting was called to order by Vice-chairman, Leonard Herring at
700 p.m,
1. CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
OF JANUARY 9, 1985
Mr. Thompson made a motion to approve the Minutes,
seconded by Ms. Boyd, motion carried.
2. CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
PLANNING SESSION OF JANUARY 12., 1985
Ms. Boyd made a motion to accept the Minutes, seconded by
Mr. Thompson, motion approved.
3. RECONSIDER PROPOSED PRO RATA OVERSIZE AGREEMENT WITH
GREENWAY PLAZA, TONY RAPOSA REALTORS-OWNER
For a new 12" water line from Thunderbird Street south of
I-35 service road to University Drive approximately 1,900
feet, oversize from 8" water line necessary to service the
development.
Mr. Nelson presented the item to the Board suggesting that
Mr. Raposa's property would require at least an 6" water
line to supplement the 6" water line available to the
property in order to provide 1,500 gallons per minute
necessary to meet Fire Code Requirements. City is
requesting an oversizing up to 12" in order to provide for
future development in the same area.
Public Utility Board Mi.tutes
February 6, 1985
Page 2
The Board asked Mr Nelson whether the oversizing of the
line was actually g )ing to serve thte City or only the one
customer. Mr. Nels-)n responed saving that it would not
have been oversized` simply to meet the needs of Mr.
Raposa. Oversize re~juirements are to meet the need of the
City and future growths in the area.
Mr. Thompson made a eotion to approve the oversizing and
recommend to the City Council acceptance of the oversizing
agreement. Ms. Boyd seconded the motion, all "ayes" no
nays motion carried.
At the end of this item, Mr. Roposa thanked the Board for
their consideration.
4. UPDATE OF THE ENERGY COSY ADJUSTMENT
Mr. Nelson initiated the item by telling the Board members
that staff recommended n~ change in the CA at the present
time from its current winter rate of 2.25 cents per KWH and
summer rate of 2.75 cents per KWH. He also directed their
attention to the attaches' memo, telling the Board of the
reasons for making no chanle at this time.
Staff told the Board estentiaily that the cost to the
utility for energy will etceed anticipated energy related
:evenues by about 2 million dollars, that amount will be
off-set by previously anticipated excess revenues. The
currently anticipated revente through the end of the fiscal
year and savings of the current year by deferring projects
until the following year `or a total of approximately
000,000, which should pro%ide approximately one million
dollars of excess revenue for the current fiscal year.
No action necessary by the Board, no action taken.
5. CONSIDER THE WATER/WASTEWAT1,R AFFLUENT CONTRACT WITH
OARMOW ESTATES
Mr. Nelson informed the Board the contract to sale sewer
affluent to Oakmont Estates is in a hold due to information
received by the City from the Nater Rights Commission. A
number of problems have been stggested to Denton. One of
the problems being that Denttn's water permit is for
municipal use, water permit hold±rs can only use water for
the purpose stated. Water Righti Commission depends on 40
to 60 percent of the municipal permitting water to be
returned for reallocation to owners of state water
permits. The Water Rights Commission does not recognize
irrigation of a private golf courts being a municipal use,
therefore, Denton cannot sale sower to a private golf
course for irrigation purposes witiout getting a secondary
u r ti r Y
February 19,`1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR 8 MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL / D , •
FROM: G. Chris 51artung, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Participation in a Water Shed Environmental Assessment Study
with North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and Six
Metroplex Utilities.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meetingg of February 6, 1985,
recommended participation in the amount of $4,500 in a Water Shed
Environmental Assessment Study to be conducted by the North Central
Texas Council of Governments and six other metroplex utilities.
SUMMARY
The NCTCOG, with the support of several metroplex utilities, are
planning to conduct a Water Shed Environmental Assessment Study.
This study would analyze in greater depth the risks and alternative
resedies for pollution of the area lakes located on the East, Elm and
West forks of the Trinity River. NCTCOG will coordinate the study
and finance 501 of the cost. The cost to the seven major setroplex
utilities, Dallas, Ft. Worth, Arlington, Tarrant County MUD, North
Texas MUD, Trinity River Authority and Denton is $4,500 each. The
study will be conducted over the next six to eight months.
BACKGROUND
Previous limited studies have been made on non-point pollution of the
Trinity River. This study will be more in depth and help identify
solutions so that we may retain a high quality of water in our water
reservoirs located on the Trinity River.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Water Utility, NCTCOG, several metroplex utilities.
FISCAL 14PACT
Cost to Denton $40500
Prepared by; Respectfully sued,
R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities '40.69
G. rlris Hartung
City Manager
Approved
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Proposed Contract
II Ordinance
III Minutes PUB Meeting of 2/6/85
3467U:8
~ N
1005L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR
THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN A NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERN-
MENT'S (NCTCOG) RESERVOIR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG),
in conjunction with other local governmental entities, wishes to form a
Reservoir Watershed Management Program to address and reduce the
potential degradation and pollution of local water supplies; and
WHEREAS, NCTCOG has invited the City of Denton to participate in
the Program and the funding thereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be in the
best interest of the City to participate in the program; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby approves the Agreement between the
North Central Texas Council of Governments and the City of Denton,
attached hereto, and authorizes the Mayor to execute the agreeement.
Section II.
That the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in
the amount of $4,500.00 in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
SECTION 111.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PAS§ED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD U: S' , KAM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
a r9 ~t~~' w, A a s ..a. r ~ ix r'4 7 F. t
LETTER OF AGREEMENT FOR
NCTCOG ASSISTANCE IN
RESERVOIR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
This Letter of Agreement is made between the City of Denton, hereinafter
referred to as Agency, and the North Central Texas Council of Governments,
hereinafter referred to as NCTCOG. This agreement is recognized as a
supplemental level of service, and is not intended to duplicate or diminish the
products, assistance, representation, or services received by the Agency
through membership in NCTCOG.
The goal of the Reservoir Watershed Management Program is to address and reduce
the potential degradation and pollution of local surface water supplies
resulting from unprecedented urban and rural growth in the watersheds of these
surface supplies. The participatini local governments and agencies have
identified the following three work elements to jointly undertake:
1. Interjurisdictional Watershed Management Planning.
2. Microcomputer Information System.
3. Training Services.
Organization
Each local government and agency which provides direct funding will select one
individual to represent its interest on a Steering Committee. In addition, the
NCTCOG Water Resources Council will appoint three at-large members to the
Steering Committee. the work program will be accomplished tinder the direction
of this Steering Committee with NCTCOG serving as coordinator and facilitator.
The NCTCOG Director of Environmental Resources will be the project coordinator.
Periodic progress reports will be made to the NCTCOG Water Resources Council
and Executive Board.
Statement of Services
NCTCOG agrees to provide the necessary staff support to the Steering
Committee. The following four major tasks will be undertaken by NCTCOG:
Task 1. Initiate and facilitate the preparation of interjurisdictional
watershed management plans, by participating and affected local
governments and agencies, to address water quality protection of
area reservoirs.
Task 2. Establish a microcomputer information system to directly support
the interjurisdictional watershed management planning activities,
including anal,~As of treatment works performance, display of
watershed characteristics, etc.
C! t ~
y i7 r Fly S .T~ t r r 'y,:i ',a , L'tl^ a't 1 n
Task 3. Conduct technical, professional, and policy training services for
local elected officials and health, water and wastewater
professionals.
Task 4. Provide administrative support to the Steering Committee.
These services are to be provided by NCTCOG beginning with execution of this
agreement and ending December 31, 1985.
Obligations
This Letter of Agreement represents a financial obligation of the Agency for
its share of the above mentioned services to be performed by NCTCOG in the
amount of $4,500. NCTCOG will provide a matching amount. The Agency will be
billed and pay its $4,500 share of the program within 60 days of execution of
this Agreement. NCTCOG will maintain individual time sheets and record
associated expenses spent on this project.
This agreement represents a service agreement, of NCTCOG to perform the service
elements assigned to NCTCOG in this agreement during the time period
described. It is recognized that the work program and related schedule will be
determined through majority vote of the Steering Committee, and that
participating jurisdictions will be responsible for completion of their
assigned work elements in a timely fashion. This Letter of Agreement may be
amended upon execution by NCTCOG and the Agency.
Authorization
The undersigned, duly authorized to make such obligations, represent NCTCOG's
and the Agency's agreement to these provisions.
(Signature) am Pit-stick
Executive Director
(Typed Name) North Central Texas
Council of Governments
(Title)
City of Denton
Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTOMO,
CITY OF DENTON. TOILS
6Y:
f ; i C :e, .i r ~ a q y w{ ' V r a v:.•f .
.P~ 7z r`.!•. bxs r
w
Public Utility eoacd Minutes
February 6, 1984
Page 5
10. CONSIDER PARTICIPATION IN THE WATER SHED ENVIRONMENTAL
C SSMENT STUD WITH NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL
GOVERNMENT AND S METRO LE TIL T ES
Mr. Nelson informed the Board that it was North Central
Texas COG Committee recommendation that the study of the
water shed be done of the seven cities involved (Denton,
Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington, Tarrant County, Municipal
Utilities District, North Texas Municipal Utilities
District, Texas River Authority) had agreed to help fund
the project and the North Texas Central COG has provided
one half the funding necessary for the project. The
project will be conducted over the next six-to eight weeks.
The Board noticed that the City of Denton was sharing
equally within the cost of the project with cities and
utility districts with much greater resources and was not
sharing with other local governmental entities who may have
a concern in this same area.
Mr. Thompson made a motion to approve the participation and
recommend to the City Council entering into agreement for
the study. Me. Boyd seconded the motion, all "ayes" no
"nays", motion carried.
11. CONSIDER APPROVAL FOR PURCHASE OF A SPARE POWER TRANSFORMER
25 NVA 5 138 K
Mr. Tullos informed the Board that the item was included in
the 1985-89 capital improvement plan. As item M/66-8 the
total cost of the purchase is $233,242 which is $116,758
under the projected cost of $350,000 budgeted for the
purchase.
The Board asked how many units this might backup. Mr.
Tullos suggested it would backup eight other units which
currently have no backup in the event of failure.
Ms. Boyd made a motion to purchase the power transformer
from Kahlman Power Specialty Transformer Division to be
paid from bond funds. Mr. Thompson seconded the motion,
all "ayes" no "nays", motion carried.
12. CONSIDER 1985 DEPARTMENT FORECAST
The staff did not have the documentation available and made
no recommendation at the present time.
The Board did ask that the staff list. all assumption
included in the document and refer to additional sources in
researching particular population growth.
~t 4T~ F`,'T~. r e x-s--"'„~ryr. rte'.. ,.February 19, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR A MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL f O, F,
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT
Consider Ordinance Amending Appendix A, Article 111, Section 4.09
Extensions cf Water and Sewer Mains, Sub-Section G, Service from
Existing Sub-Standard Size Lines.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of November 14, 19849
recommends to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council
that the attached ordinance amendment to Appendix A, Article III,
Section 4.09, Extensi,)ns of Water and Sewer Mains, Sub-Section G.
Service from Existing Sub-Standards Sized Lines, be adopted.
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their meeting of January 30,
1985, also recommended approval of subject ordinance amendment.
SUMMARY
There exists numerous substandard sized water lines in the City of
Denton such as 2111 3" and 4" sizes. Residential and
commercial/industrial developers often request service from such
lines. uch requests often come from individuals who have purchased
a lot in an existing area that has a -mall line, or they are
sub-dividing a lot into two lots, or they aie businesses constructing
an addition or a new business on a vacant lot. The Utility has
programmed the replacement of many of these lines in our Five Year
Capital Improvement Plan, but certainly not all of them.
The present policy and ordinance require an individual residential
lot developer to place a b" or 8" line in the middle of the block and
tie to smaller lines on each side. This ordinance is not a practical
method of providing the needed capital projects. To clarify the
City's policy in this area, the attached ordinance is proposed. This
ordinance spells out essentially the same position that the Staff now
takes in such cases with the exception ender the residential options
wherein an individual lot would pay the "pro-rata" fee for a properly
sized line across the full length of t eh it property, rather than
having to install an entire new line and tie into sub-standard lines
on each end. This pro-rata option would only be for lots that are
within 300' of an existing fire hydrant and provided that minimum
water service for domestic uses is available from the small line.
BACKGROUN')
Not applicable.
34b7U:9
r'7i•
l 5 , '7 .r w, e ✓y y ch I 'V. I
PROGRAMS, DFPART14ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Municipal Utilities, Legal Department Staff, developers and
citizens, .
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of this ordinance could result in less benefits to the City
since a single lot residential developer would only be paying 601 of
the cost of installing the line across his property instead of the
full 1001.
Prepared by: Respectfully submitted,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
G. C r s
City Manager
Approved-
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Ordinance Revision
II Minutes PUB Meeting of 11/14/84
III Minutes from P&Z Meeting of 1/30/85
i
3467U:10
t t ie • 1 r s vd' r
0994E
• N0•
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A (DENTON DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO PROVIDE FOR PAYMENT OF
PRO RATA CHARGES IN LIEU OF INSTALLATION OF REQUIRED WATER LINES
TO SERVE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT DEVELUPMENTS; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS H£RLBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That Article 4.09 of Chapter IV of Appendix A of the Code of
Ordinances is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph (G) which
shall read as follows:
(G) Water Service for Sin le Family Residential Lots from
Substandard nes a ant o ro ata Charges in Lieu
o ns a at ono ew water Llnego
(a) Where an existing water line is determined sub-
standard because it doea not provide adequate
water car.actty to serve the proposed development
of a lot for a single family residential unit in
accordance with the provisions of this Code, the
person requesting approval of the development,
may, if such lot is within 300 feet of an existing
fire hydrant, in lieu of installing additional
water line facilities to adequately serve the lot,
pay to the city a pro rata charge in an amount
that would cave been charged for tapping a water
line of sufficient capacity extended to the lot
by the city in accordance with Article 4.09.
(b) Upon approval of the development, payment of the
pro rats charges and payment of any other appli-
cable tapping, meter installation, or service
fees, the person nay connect to the existing sub-
standard water line.
SECTION It.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this this day of , 1985.
AIL" r a.
,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SFCKETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY O((F~~ DENTON, TEXAS
BY: rK1M
_ p Wv x i 1 fir. s..
Public Utility Board Minutes
November 14,,1984
Page 5
9. RECEIVE WORK ORDER STATUS INFORMATION, ELECTRIC, WATER, AND
WASTEWATER SERVICE AREAS
The Board asked why the Utility Department is paying for
paving at the Service Center which is being used by all
City Departments. Mr. Nelson informed the Board that
Utilities had agreed to pay for the materials and Public
Works would do the work. providing manpower and equipment.
No other action was required on this item, none was taken.
The Board also asked whether the Department had abandoned
projects after having spent funds and prior to completion.
Mr. Nelson responded telling the Board that some projects
had been abandoned, particularly when an oversized line is
involved and the developer stops his development.
10. CONSIDER MONTHLY REPORTS
Mr. Nelson reviewed the Monthly Revenue and Expenditure
Summary with the Board for the month of September which
corresponds to the 1983-84 fiscal year end. The report
shows a total operating balance of $6,236,104, net of
operations.
the Board requested that the sta-.f provide a five year
forecast of operating costs and revenues with projected
rate effects. No other action was requested, nor was any
taken.
11. CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A, ARTICLE III,
SECTI0N 4.09, SERVICE FROM EXTENSIONS OF WATER AND SEWER
MAINS, SUB-SECTION G, SUB-STANDARD SIZED LINES
Mr. Nelson presented this item to the Board suggesting that
the problem faced is whether a residential customer is
required to replace an undersized line along the property
line with an adequately sized line which connects at both
ends to undersized lines. The proposed ordinance will
allow the city to collect the nro-rata share and allow the
customer to connect to the existing line for one single-
family residential lot only. Multi-family or multi-unit or
multi-lot development will not be allowed to connect to the
undersized line nor will commercial development to allowed
to connect to an undersized line.
After discussion, including Mr. Walter Hartman who is in
the described predicament, Mr. COOme3 made a motion to
recommend the Ordinance to the Council for adoption. Mr.
Thompson seconded the motion. Five "ayes", no "nays"
motion carried.
t : , y. ~ i A•, v'~ ~ ~~^i i..yYfd ~r ~ it n ~ 7 tiN~
,ii 'Min Ee# w. -
Ja'rluaC 30, 1985
Page 1~
No one spaKe in favor or in opposition to the request-
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of the
final re plat of the Haywood Addition, Lot 1, b1oeK I.
Seconded by Mr. LaForte and unanimously carried (5-0).
H. Recommend approval of final re plat of the Independence
Square Audition, B1ocK A, Lot 1-R.
Mr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 1.451 acres
situated west of and abutting Teasley Lane and north
of Londonderry Lane. The site is zoned general retail
and shopping center development is anticipated. He
stated water, sewer, electric, telephone and commercial
solid waste services and facilities are adequate ano
available. The sanitary sewer capacity, however, is
limit d at this location and is to be upgraded under
the Capital Improvements Program. In the meantime, the
developers have agreed to limit developments on tnis
site to 'dcy type' user. An agreement to this effect
nas been signed by the aevelopecs and the Director of
Utilities representing the city. Staff recommends
apizoval of the final replat.
Mc. 81dor questioned 'dry type' use. He asked if this
means no water or commodes.
Mr. Rumfielo answered, limited water use. He stated
they will have two sinKS and four commodes.
Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend approval of the
final re plat of Independence Square, Lot 1-x, d1ocK A.
Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (5-0).
IV. Considerations
A. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the Hell
Addition.
Mr. Clark stated tae preliminary plat did not meet the
requirements on drainage, therefore, the Development
Review CommLttee recommends denial.
Me. LaForte made a motion to deny the preliminiacy plat
of the Bell Addition. Seconded by Ms. Cole and
unanimously carried (5-0).
e, deceive a report on sewer service for M i d metal
Addition.
Me. Rumfielo stated due to nardenips and very limited
use on sewer and since the costs are so great to improve
the sewer lines, the water/Wastewater Uepertment under
tnese circumstances won't require 14 i B Metal to extend
the sewer service.
C. Recommend approval of an ordinance amending Appendix A
(Denton Development Code) of the Code of ordinances of
the City of Denton to provide for payment of pro rata
cnarges in lieu of installation of required water lines
to serve single family residential lot developments;
and providing for an effective date,
q. ~`~.i ~ ~ f-t» ~ ,Y"p+'" r•",:~s ~w..
[ 8' MlI1Of 985
ahuat 3
Page 1
Mr. Ham stated tnere exists numerous substandard sisec
water lines in the City of uenton such as 2 incn, 3 inch
and 4 inch sites. Residential and commercial/induattial
developers often request service from such lines. Such
requests often come from individuals who nave purchased
a lot in an existing area that has a small line, or they
are Sub-dividing a lot into two lots, or they are
business men who are constructing an addition to tneir
business or a new business on a vacant lot. Tne Utility
Department nas programed the replacement of many of
these lines In our Five Year Capital improvement Plan,
but not all of them. He explained the procedures wnen
an individual requests service, which is to install an
adequate sized line in front of the property. He ex-
plained requiring an individual residential lot develo p-
er to place a 6 inch or 8 inch line in the middle of the
010Ck and tie to smaller lines on earn side Is not a
practical method of providing needed capital pro3ects.
To clarify the city's policy in this area, ne read the
proposed ordinance to be amended whicn will make an
exception under the residential options wherein an
individual lot would pay the "pro-rata" fee for a
properly sized line across the full length of tneic
property • rather than naving to install an entire new
line and tie into sun-standard lines on each end. This
pro-rata option would only be for lots that are within
300 feet of an existing fire hydrant and provided that
minimum service for domestic uses is available frog the
small line. He added adoption of this ordinance could
result in less benefits to the city since a S.r,gle lot
residential developer would only be paying b0 percent of
the cost of installing the line across his property
instead of the cull 100 percent.
On question from Mr. Wearson, Mr. Ham answered he would
hope the funds when paid for pro-rata snare, would be
ear-markea for tnose lines, he said he was not sure, it
would be up to finance.
Walter Hartman stated ne is very much in favor of tnis
amendment as it costs from $1,090 to $2,000 for to piling
fee on each end of the line. He stated this nad
na ppened to him and ne was left suspendea between
subatandard lines and spending lots of money to upgrade
the lines. He stated it ie lire ourying money in your
front yard.
Mr. Laeorte maue a motion to recommend approval of an
ordinance amending Appendix A (uenton Uevelopment ioae)
of the Code of urdinances of the City of Denton to
provide for payment of pxo rata charges in lieu of
installation or required water sines to serve single
family residential lot developments, it put in layman's
terminology. Seconded by Mr. Pearson,
Mr. Sidor commented he agrees with the ordinance, out
disagrees with the verbage.
Vote was called and motion passed unanimously p5-0).
U. New Business
Mr. Ellison stated the date of the meeting of the Public
Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission
had been changed to rebruary 13, 19851 after the P i Z
meeting of that date. He said 7330 p.m, would be the
target for the beginning time.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 8350 p.m.
'1 h.,~ F N M A A 10
fAi
C17Yof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUfL DING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
DATE. February 13, 1985
SUBJECT: Street Bond Information
First Southwest has advised us that they will be sending the
ordinance calling the bond election. The Council will have it
before the meeting on Tuesday, February 19, 1985. This is a
standard type of ordinance that we have used in the past. The
caption will be "A Bond Election for $10,000,006 for Street
Improvements." Since the Council approved the Committee's
recommendation at their meeting on Tuesday, February 12, 1985,
I would assume that the $10,000,000 will be used for the
Priority 01 rankings as submitted by the Committee.
John McGrane has also included a memo which again details the
financing of this issue. As we mentioned earlier, if this is
to be a no tax increase issue, part of the street operating
funds would have to be used in order to eliminate any tax.
John's calculations show we would eliminate approximately
$215,000 from the street maintenance budget for the next
several years.
Finally, the staff is currently working on an estimate of which
streets in the Priority 12 ranking could b~ funded from the
remaining monies in the street department operating fund. We
would continue to do this as a part of the maintenance
operation in the coming years. As City revenues grow and as
funding capabilities in the street department increase, we
would be able to continue this pay-as-you-go type of operation
in the future.
If you or the Council have any questions, we would be happy to
try and respond to them.
Z~~o J4
c ve a
Assistant City Manager
ji
2125M
CITY ofDEA►TOIIf,TEXAi MUNICIPAL BUILDING / LIEN TON, TEXAS 7b TELEPHONE!9t7?'.E~e
LI! ~CE?0 ul- ~J
FEB 13
M E M O R A N D U M
a a s a a a a a a a
DATE: February 139 1985
TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: John F. McGrane, Finance Director
SUBJECT: FINANCING OF THE TEN MILLION DOLLAR STREET BOND3
The staff has advised the Citizens` Blue Ribbon Committee that it
may be possible to finance ten million ($1.0,000,000.00) dollars
of street bonds without having an increase in the tax rate. This
premise is based on several assumptions that allow the proposed
bond issuance to be "tax free". Ii any of these assumptions do
not come to fruition, a reassessment of the need for additional
taxes may be necessary. The assumptions are:
annbase for ual rate tax
1. cThe ollections present will property at valuation
9.875%. This rate is based on a regression
analysis projected out from a six (6) year
historical base.
2. Interest earnings will accrue based on an 8.5%
rate. It also assumes that the streets program
will be spread over a five (5) year time frame
spending approximately two million ($2,000,000.00)
dollars per year. The balance of the funds will
be invested and the interest earnings dfrom
ebt
investments will be used to pay part of the service requirements.
I
J 'p
i 5 M v
Memo to Chris Hartung
February 13, 1985
Page 2
3. The bonds will be sold at a ten (10%) per cent or
less annual interest payment rate.
4. In the current operating budget, there are funds
provided for a street maintenance program.
Portions of these funds will he utilized to pay
some of the debt service requirements for the
first five (5) years. This funding equates to
approximately two ($.02) cents of the current
fifty-nine ($.59) cent tax rate. It is anticipated
that this allocation would continue for at least a
five year time period.
Finally, I would like to re-emphasize that this "no tax" increase
is for this street bond tundin only. If there are any additional
bond sales, there would ne~to b_e a reassessment of the debt
Erervice requirements based upon those projections. And, in all
likelihood, would necessitate a tax increase. In addition, the
"no taxi' increase is assumed only for the debt service portion of
the tax rate. It is conceivable, with the possible loss of
Revenue 5hating funds and/or other revenue resources, that an
increase may be needed for the operations portion of the tax rate.
If you need any additional information, please advise accordingly.A C
AN t
ab
1373E
r ~ s v7 'f} ,.y r ; a r ao. ..i
t 1
CEA'1'IFICATE Fit
OFOXNANCE CALLING AEC 0 enBMCN
THE STATE CF TE70.S s
COImNTY OF DENR7H t
CITY OF DEn'ICN t
Fla, the undersigned officers of said City, hereby oartify as follows:
1. The City Council of said City oaavened in
REtAJiM MEETING CV THE 197H Nil' OF FE8R1Mr 1985,
at the Municipal Building (City Hall), and the roll was called of the duly
constituted officers and members of said City Council, to-witt
Charlotte Allen, City Secretary Richard 0. Stewart, Mayor
Mark R. Chew Dr. A. Ray Stephens
Linnie McAdams Jim Riddlesperger
Charles Hopkins Joe G. Alford
and all of said persons were present, except the follwing absenteess
, thus ooratitut Lng a quorum.
Shereupon, among other .peas, following the vas transacted a• said Meeting:
a written
ORDINANCE CAIJAM A BOLD EI WTTON
was duly introduced for the considert►san of said City Council and duly read.
It was Lhen duly rim*6 and seoorndrd that said Ordinance be passeds and, after
due discussion, said motion, carrying with it the passage of said Ordinance,
prevailed and carried by the following votes
AYFSI All members of said City Council
shown present above voted "Aye'.
NCES: None.
2. That a true, full, and correct copy of the aforesaid Ordinanoe passed
at the Meeting described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to
and follows this Certificates that said Ordinance has been duly reoorded in
said lity Council's minutes of said Meetings that the above and foregoing
paragraph is a true, full, and correct excerpt from said City Cou.~ncil's
minutes of said Meeting pertaining to the passage of said Ordinances that the
persons named in the above and foregoing paragraph are the duly chosen,
qualified, and acting officers and members of said City Council as indicated
thereins that each of the officers and members of said Cie Co ncil was °:ily
and sufficiently notified officially and personally, in advance, of the time,
place, and purpose of the aforesaid Meeting, and that said o-.jnwxv would be
introduced and considered for passage at said Meetings and that said Meeting
was; open to the public, and public notice of the time, place, and purpose of
said meeting was given, all as rega red by vernon's Ann. Civ. St. Article
6252-17.
3. That the Mayor of said. City has approved, and hereby appraws, the
aforesaid OrCinannces that the mayor and the City Secretary of said City have
duly signed said Ordinances and that the Mayor and the City Secretary of said
City hereby declare that their signing of this Certificate shall oonatitute
the signing of the attached and following copy of said Ordinance for all
purposes.
SIGNED AND SLUM the 15th day of February, 1985.
hayor
(SEAL?--
we, the undersigned, hneing respectively the City Attorney and the Bond
Attorneys of the City of Denton, Texas, haxvtb oartify that we prepared and
approved as to legality the attached ani following Ordinasros prior to its
passage as aforesaid.
City ttorney
M !r k aF
71 747° i~l^ i 1 Y._ y lp_,
h r .Pr ' "tz "1 r ,,I) Y ' 1.4."q' '5 __Z z
ORDINANCE NO. 85-
ORDINANCE CALLING A BONb~LECTION
THE STATE OF TEXAS s
COUNTY OF DENTON s
CITY OF DENTON t
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable to call the
election hereinafter orderedi and
WHEREAS, it is hereby officially found and determineds
that a came of emergency or urgent public necessity exists
which requires, the holding of the meeting at which this Ordi-
nance is passed, such emergency or urgent public necessity
being that the proceeds from the sale of the proposed bonds are
required as soon as possible and without delay for necessary
and urgently needed public improvementst and that said meeting
was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place,
and purpose of said westing was given, all as required by
Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. Article 6252-17.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY OPDAINSt
1. That an election shall be held on MARCH 23, 1985, in
said City at the following designated polling places
THE DENTON CIVIC CFNTER BUILDING.
Said City shall constitute a single election precinct for said
election, and the following election officers are hereby
appointed to hold said elections
Presiding Judges
Alternate Presiding Judges
2. That the Presiding Judge shall appoint not less than
two qualified election clerks to serve and assist in conducting
said elections provided that if the Presiding Judge actually
serves as expected, the Alternate Presiding Judge shall be ono
of such clerks.
3. That by approving and signing this Ordinance the Mayor
of said City officially confirms his appointrent of the afore-
said election officers to serve at said electio:j and by
the n appointment governing of the y afof !said oresaid City election
and parsing concurs in Ordinance
officers.
That all resident, qualified electors of the City
shell be entitled to vote at said election.
5. That notice of said election shall be giver. by posting
a substantial copy of this Ordinance at the City Hall and at
three other public places in said City, not less than 15 days
prior to the date set for said elections and a substantial copy
of this Ordinance also shall be published on the same day in
sash of two successive weeks in t newspaper of general circula-
tion published in said City, the date of the first publication
to be not lees then 14 days prior to the date set for said
election.
6. That at said election the following PROPOSITION shall
be submitted in accordance with laws
t { xf ~ = r, w '
PROPOSITION
- Shall the City Council of the City of Denton be
authorized to issue the bonds of said City, in one or more
Series or issues, in the aggregate principal amount of
$10,000,000, with the bonds of each such seeies or issue,
respectively, to mature serially within not to exceed
thirty years from their date, and to be sold at such
prices and bear interest at such rates, not to exceed the
maximum rates permitted by law at the respective times of
issuance, as shall be determinO within the discretion of
the City Council, for the purpose of the a:cuisition of
property and making improvements for public purposes in
said City, to-wits street improvements; and shall said
City Council be authorized to levy and cause to be
assessed and collected annual ad valorem taxes in an
amount sufficient to pay the annual interest on said bon.is
and provide a sinking fund to pay said bonds at maturity?
7. That the official ballots for said election shall be
pr,2pared in accordance with the Texas Election Code so as to
permit the electors to vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" the aforesaid
PROPOSITION, with the ballots to contain such provisions,
markings, and languages as required by law, and with such
PROPOSITION to be exprosted substantially as follows:
PROPOSITION
FOR 1
THE ISSUANCE OF 510400,000 OF STREET
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
AGAINST )
S. Tha• it is hereby found and determined that the
proW)le period of usefulnpes of the proposed improvements
covered by the aforesaid PROPOSITION is 15 years.
9. That Article 9, Sac. 9.02 of the City Charter contains
the following provision and requires this election ordinance to
distinctly specifys
"(d) A determination of the net debt of tho, City
after issuance of the bords thereby authorized, together
with a declaration that the bonds thereby authorized wiii
bo within all debt and other '.imitations prescribed by
the Co,atitution and laws of the State of Texas".
The determination is hereby made that the net debt of the City
after the issuance of the bonds herein proposed to be submitted
will be not more than ;24,89:,750, and it is herel;l declared
that said general obligation bonds will be within all debt and
other limitations prescribed by the Constitution and laws of
the State of Texas.
I
h7~a °a 0'C ~;C r E'~. ~C ~Fl 1,44
1
g P l"'~n Y'•¢V. +:y1ry .?a ~u~r~. 4 1 rs r. t t. 1014L (SIL) L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE CALLING AND ORDERING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ON APRIL 6, 1965, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ELECTING FOUR COUNCILPERSONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS FOR PLACES 1, 2, 3 AND 4; ORDERING THAT THE PUNCH
CARD ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM ADOPTED BY DENTON COUNTY BE USED
IN SAID ELECTION; PROVIDING FOR VOTING PLACES AND APPOINTING
ELECTION OFFICIALS AND PROVIDING FOR ELECTION SUPPLIES.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
Pursuant to the terms and provisions of Section 3.01 of the
Charter of the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal election is
hereby ordered held in the City of Denton, Texas on the 6th day
of April, 1955, for the purpose of electing four (4) council.
persons to the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, as
follows:
Place 1 - Councilperson to be elected for a two (2) year term by
the qualified voters of Single Member District No. 1
of the City of Denton, Texas. Candidates for Plo
No. 1 must reside in Single Member District No. 1.
Place 2 - Councilperson to be elected for a two (2) year term by
the qualified voters of Single Member District No. 2
of the City of Denton, Texas. Candidates for Place
No. 2 must reside in Single Member District No. 2.
Place 3 - Councilperson to be elected for a two (2) year term by
the qualified voters of Single Member District No. 3
of the City of Denton, Texas. Candidates for Place 3
must reside in Single Member District No. 3.
Place 4 - Councilperson to be elected for a two (2) year term by
the qualified voters of Single Member District No. 4
of the City of Denton, Texas. Candidates for Place
No. 4 Lust reside in Single Member District No. 4.
5ECTEON II.
The polls for said election on April 6, 1985 shall be ope:i
from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M., and the clecti.on voting places or
polling places shall be as follows:
1. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 1 shall vote at:
AMERICAN LEGION HALL
629 LAKEY STREET
DENTON, TEXAS
2. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 2 shall vote at:
FIRE STATION NO. 4
2110 SHERMAN DRIVE
DENTON, TEXAS
PACE 1
Yif~r -
4
~ r 5 c~d r• .1 k f^, ~ W^ a ~ +4 q~ 1,
~ ~ +'v'k,, ~ (dd ',°i a~ '+"R r~ 4 e da ,
!
9. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 3 shall vote at:
NORTH LAKES RECREATION CENTER
2001 WEST WINDSOR DRIVE
DENTON, TEXAS
4. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 4 shall vote at:
DENIA PARK RECREATION CENTER
1001 PARVIN
DENTON, TEXAS
SECTION 111.
The election officials for said election on April 6, 1985
shall be as follows:
I. (a) Jo Luker shall be the Presiding Judge at the Central
Counting Station.
(b) Joann Carbactk shall be the Manager of the Central
Counting Station.
(c) Marilyn Robinson shall be the Tabulation Supervisor at
the Central Courting Station.
2. Bill Luker shall be the Presiding Judge at the American
Legion Halt in Single tiember District No. 1.
s. Doris Chipman shall be the Presiding Judge at the Eire
Station No. 4 in Single Nember District No. 2.
4. Marsha Keffer shall be the Presiding Judge at the North Lakes
Recreation Center in Single Member District No. 3.
5. Mrs. R. B. Escue, Jr. shall be the Presiding Judge at Denia
Park Recreation Center in Sirgle Member District No. 4.
6. Charlotte Allen, City Secretary shall onduct absentee voting
under the Texas Election Code.
The respective Presiding Judie of each voting Place and the
Central Counting Station shall be authorized to appoint a
sufficient number of Clerks as they may deem necessary to assist
them in said election, including bilingual assistants as
required by law.
SECTION IV.
Absentee voting shall be conducted by the Office of the City
Secretary in the municipal building on East McKinney Street in
the City of Denton, Texas, and the polls for absentee voting
shall be open for voting in person between the hour of 8:00 A.M.
and 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday during the times allowed for
absentee voting.
SECTION V.
The City 5ecretery is hereby authorised to prepare the
official ballot for said sloction and perform eact. and every act
required by the Charter end laws of the State of Texas for
holding elections.
PACE 2
A xr Y` v 7s r i JoC i:.
E(
1
1
SECTION VI.
It is further ordered that the punch card electronic voting
system adopted by Denton County be used in said election in
accordance with the termnteand provisions of Article 1.15 of the
sed Code. The punch card
Texas Election
absee voting in personcandnby mail. system
shall be u
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of February, 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOIT
CITY OF DENTON,~TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
JOE 0. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:_
a'
PAGE 3
DATE 2/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT /01~
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMs G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECTS Ordinance Approving Contract between City of Denton and Charles Willis
b Associates.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Board to approve the
Airport Master Plan Study contract between the City of Denton and Charles
Willis and Associates.
SMEARY :
The propceed Master Plan Study and Env,.ronmental Impact Assessment Report
contract in the am-ant of $38,546.00 is for services vital to the orderly
and properly planned development of the Denton Airport. These services as
detailed in the attached contract and narrative will include such things as
data collection, demand analysis, ecomomic impact, facility requirements,
land use and airport layout, environmental assessments and more.
BACKGROUND:
The uiev Couuncil on January 29, 1985, passed a resolution accepting a
Federal Aviation Administration grant offer in the amount of $34,691.00.
This now is to approve an ordinate for the actual contract with the
consultant to perform the services. The FAA will fund 90% of such
projects,leaviug 10%, or $3,855.00, to the City in match,'ug funds. A
certain portion of that City expense, ttpto $1,500.00, will be defrayed
through City in-kind services.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
This study will require approximately four months to complete. To
assure continuity with City programs and development, and to defray a
portion of the ten percent matching City funds required in the Grant Offer,
the Planning and Community Development Department will assist in this study.
The City Engineering Department may also be asked to participate to a small
degree.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Grant conditions require ten percent matching City f• ds. A certain
portion of that, up to $1,500.00, will be defrayed through the use of
in-kind services c' the City Staff.
Prepared byt Appro ed by: Respectfully Submitted:
'T
Clint Lynch 8t~ An elo
0, Chris Hartung
City Manager
r L '"G 4 tg, g " p.
y r r s. ~ 1 Iw. i 4 : 's. v f, r 40: fr Lti w Mr x er uS
, 4 ~ r ti i, 7
:
C~
0 CIY
P
February 13, 1985
Mr. Charles Willis
Charles Willis and Associates, Inc.
1030 North Davis Drive
Arlington, Texas 76012
Dear Mr. Willis:
This refers to the Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Prograoa
20-103, for a Master Plan Study and Enviromental Impact Assessment of the
Denton Municipal Airport.
The City Council of the City of Denton has approved an ordinance approving the
contract between the City of Denton and Charles Willis and Associatea, Inc.,
and has authorized the Mayor to execute that contract. Accordingly, you are
hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the scope of work described in
the contract and attached narrative.
In addition, the City of Denton will require that in-kind services be allowed
toward the 10% local share, or matching City funds, not t~ exceed $1,S00.00.
The scope :,f work and its monetary value of those in-kind services shall be
mutually agreed upon by and between the City of Denton and Charles Willis and
Associatesi and described in writing, prior to the execution of any such work.
All in-kind services shall be subjected to Federal Aviation Administration
review and approval.
7f you agree and concur with the above, we would appreciate your signing below
and returning the original copy to the City of Denton.
Sincerely,
Clinton Lynch
Manager
Denton Municipal Airport
CL/sc
Attachment
Mrles W11118 Date
Charles Willis and Associates, Inc.
b Sytn x: vii y Y'.P.Y5I tk '.V Y ;i "y4 G. y1 .((.44 .1:
j ~VM 4 A
1DOSL
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
CHARLES WILLIS 6 ASSOCIATES INC-, FOR PROFESSIOIJ,L CONSULTING
SERVICES REGARDING AN AIRPORT kASTER PLANNING STUDY; AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT; APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING rOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHERk.AS, the City of Denton, Texas has received a grant from the
Federal Aviation Administration for a Master Plan Update and Environ-
mental Impa Assessment for the Denton Municipal Airport; and
WHEREAS, the City staff and the Airport Board has recommended
that the professional consulting firm of Charles Willis 6 Associates,
Inc., be retained for the project; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas
requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure
of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shall be by ordi-
nance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DERYON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the contract with Charles Willis 6 Associates, Inc.,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, for professional consulting
services in connection with the preparation ci the Dent.~n Municipal
Airport Mastur Plan and related documents is hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorised to execute the contract on behalf of the
City.
SECTION It.
That the expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as
specified in the attached contract is hereby approved.
SECTION 111.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWARTO MAYOR
CITY OF DFNTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
CHARLUM XCLES CITY SECRETARY
CITY Of DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Or D/ENTOON,, TEXAS I
BY t o C'u s,7Y A k i G,..'6~
t y „
n l r r v t= c r . ni< F<<i J '9 r .i v Y t i r« M. 3 r ' i .'J{ ~ ^ y by
STATE OF TEXAS
CON ULTING SERVICES AGRLTH PP
COUNTY OF DENPON
THIS Ac-rAMMENT made, entered into and executed this day of
, 1485, by and between the City of ihnton Texas, a municipal
:orporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Texas m u situated in Denton Courrcy, Texas, acting through authority
conferred on Mayor, hereinafter called "Sponsor" and Charles Willis &
Associates, Inc, hereinafter called "Consultant".
WHEREAS, the SPONSOR desires to undertake an Airport Master Plan,
study for Denton Municipal Airport, hereinafter called the PROJWr;
WHERZAS, the SPONSOR desires to obtain professional consulting
services in connection with the PROJECT, such services to include
f those presentee in the Program Narrative attached hereto;
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT is qualiti,%d and capable of r erforming
the services proposes herein, is acceptable to the SPONSOR, and is
willing to enter an agreement with the SPONSOR, to perform such ser-
vices;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the parties hereto do
mutually agree as followsi
ARTICLE 1.
EMPLOYMENT OF THE W4SULTANP
1.1 The SPONSOR agrees to retain the CONSULTANT, and the
rf b ~ . .r x •1mi w Y,A i Y~' 'y.. C. `!i i c s < i i i .
CONSULTANT agrees to perform consulting services in connection with
the PROJECT as set forth ir. the following sections. The SPONSOR
agrees to pay, and the CONSULTANT agrees to accept fees as specified
i•i sections following as full and final compensation for the work
acoarplished.
1.1.2 It is expressly agreed that CONSULTANT shall nit begin
work on the services described in this Agreement until City has re-
ceived written notification from the Federal Aviation Association that
fu;iding for PROTECT has been appro%,ed. It is further agreed that the
effective date of this Agreement shall be the date City receives said
notification of FAA approval.
ARTICLE 2
CONSULTANT SERVICES
2.1 BASIC SERVICES
2.1.1 The CONSUL•PANT agrees to perform services in connection
with the PROJECT as hereinafter stated, which servi,'~es are descr;bed
in the attached Program Narrative consisting of thirteen tasks, said
services to include the stipulations within the At',REE IC;
2.1.2 The CONSULTANT shall serve as the SPONSOR's professional
representative in the effort described in said Program Narrative
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and shall give consultation
and advice to the SPOiSAR during the performance of his services.
2,1.3 Consultant shall make written reports to SPONSOR as
described in the Program Narrative attached hereto and incorporated
herein.
ml
ARTICLE 3
SPECIAL SERVICES
3.1 GENERAL
3.1.1 The CONSULTING services set forth hereinafter as Special
Services are not included as pant of the services to be provided by
the CONSULTANT under ARTICIZ 2. It is recognized that the elements of
such consulting work cannot be accurately predetermined or controlled
entirely by the CONSULTANT. Therefore, such work will be performed as
Special Services.
3.1.2 The CONSULTANT will furnish Special Services osily when
authorized by the S.Pr*1SOR in writing.
3.1.3. Special Services include investigations, tests, sampling,
surveys or other services not otherwise delim2ated in the Program
Narrative which are required during the course of work to be per-
formed.
3.1.4 Special Services shall include the publication of a
summary ("popular") report which shall be a brief, non-technical
graphic representation of the proposed development, primarily intenL-d
for public distribution.
ARTICLE 4
COMPENSATION
4.1 PAYHW FOR ARTICLE 2 SERVICES
4.1.1 The fee for services described in Article 2 shall be a
lump sum amount and shall be full oompensetion for all items of work
f? 4,7 GY &<!.. 91`. .x,51
defined therein.
For these services, the CONSULTANT will be paid the sum of
$38,556.00. The billing period for said services will be calendar
months. The lump sum amount does not include payment for Special
£ervioe: listed in Article 3.
4.1.2 °arti,-il payment shall be made to thF, CONSUMM from time
to time upon presentation of statements for such services to the
SPONSOR. In no case shall partial payment items be in excess of the
value of the services compiled at the time a statement is rendered.
4.2 PAYMENT FOR ARTICLE 3 SERVICES
Payment for services described in Article 3 shall be computed ore
the basis of hourly rates for man power classifications as follows:
MAN POWER HOURLY
CLASSIFICATIONS RATE
Principal 66.00
Sr. Planner 48.00
Sr. Engineer 40.00
Technician 28.00
Clerical 17.50
Direct Non-Labor Expenses incurred as a result of Special
Services shall be reimbursable at actual invoice. Direct Non-Labor
Expenses are defined as all non-labor expenses incurred by the
CONSULTANT which are directly chargeable to the PROJECT, which in
general include expenses for suppliers, transportation, equipment,
travel, communication3, subsistenoe and lodging away from home, field
office expenses, reproduction and similar im:id,ntals.
.r4
4.3 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF PRINTED DOCUMENTS
Additional copies of the report in excess of those specified in
-:he program Narrative shall be furnished to the SPONSOR request
to the CONSULTANT, and shall be paid for by the SPONSOR at actual
invoice cost to the CONSULTA% plus 10%.
4.4 PAYMENT To CONSULTANT
All payments for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement by
the CONSULTANT shall be paid within ninety (90) days after invoice
date.
ARTICLE 5
PERIOD OF SERVICE
5.1 Tasks 1-11 shall be completed as described in the attached
Program Narrative which is attached and included herein.
5.2 Modification of the Work Schedule shall be made only by
written modification of this Agreement signed by SPONSOR and
CONSULTANT.
ARTICLE 6
SERVICES BY THE SPONSOR
6.1 In general the St'ot" and its representatives will render
services as follaass
a. The SPONSOR shall guarantee access to and mAke all
provisions for the CONSULTANT to enter upon public and
private lands as required for the CONSULTANT to perform
services in the development of the PRaMT-
b. The SPONSOR shall provide or make available all
available statistical data and other information which
may be required by the CONSULTANT in order to perform
the technical and analytical work described in the
Technical Proposal attached hereto.
c. The SPONSOR shall give thorough consideration to all
reports, sketches, estimates, drawing., specifications,
proposals, and other documents presented by tho
CONSULTANT, and shall inform the CONSULTANT of all
decisions within a reasonable time so as not to delay
the w nrk of the OONSULMIT.
d. The SPONSOR shall hold promptly all required special
meetings, carve all required public and private notices,
receive and act upon all protests and fulfill all
requirements necessary in the development :.f the
PRO"MT, and pay all costs incident thereto.
e. The SPONSOR shall furnish the CONSULTANT with a copy of
any design and construe:ion standards he small require
the CCNSULTAi\'r to follow in the course of wcrk.
f. The SPONSOR shall designate a single person to act as
SPONSOR's Representative with respect to the work to be
performed under this AGREEMENT. The person designated
as SPONSOR's Representative shall have complete
2 + np,x• rt W3 L a.
9 .L.a Y. 4 Y 1: ' f u authority to transmit instructions, receive information,
interpret and define SPONSOR's policy and decisions,
with respect to the elements and systems pertinent to
the work covered by this AGREIIKENP.
6.2 The services, information, surveys, and reports required by
Paragraph 6.1, a through f ir,.-lusive, shall be furnished at the
SPONSOR's EXPEN&E, and the CONSULTANT shall be entitled to rely upon
the accuracy and completeness thereof.
ARTICLE 7
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
MNERSHIP OF DOCUMM
Original drawing and documents shall become the property of the
SPONSOR, and will be delivered to the SPONSOR upon completion of the
study. Reproductions of them may be used by others upon written
consent of the SPONSOR, however, the CONSULTANT shall have no
liability for the accuracy or completeness of the docusrient after they
have been delivered into the custody of the SPONSOR.
ARTICLE S
ASSIGNM
This AGREEMENT shall not be assignable in whole or in part
without the written consent of the other party.
ARTICLE 9
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
The CONSULTANT agrees to conform to the STANDAP.D DOT TITLE VI
ASSURANCES, and agrees not to discriminate against any employee or
applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, age or
national origin.
ARTICLE 10
TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
In connection with all i.;rk outlined or contemplated above, it is
agreed that the SPONSOR or the CONSULTANT may cancel or terminate this
AC,RFUmn upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other, with the
provision and understanding that immediately upon receipt of notice of
such cancellation from either party to the other, all v:.ork and labor
being performed under this AGREEMENT shall immediately cease, pending
final cancellation at the end of such thirty (30) day period, and fur-
ther provide that the CONSULTANT shall be compensated in accordance
with the terms of this AGW7RENT for all work accomplished prior to
the receipt of notice of such termination.
ARTICLE 11
VENUE
Venue and jurisdiction of any suit, right or cause of action
arising under or in connection with this AGREEMENT shall be
exclusively in Denton County, Texas,
ARTICLE 12
CONTRACT EXBOUTION
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Denton, Texas has caused
these presents to be exemted by An Mayor and attested by its
r
Secretary and executed by CHARD'S WILLIS & ASSOCIATES, INC., through
its President
THE CITY OF DENTON CHARLES WILLIS & ASSOCIATES,, INC.
BY: BYt
ATTEST s
I
PART IV
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
I. OBJDCTIVFS
Based upon our understanding of needs and goals of the City of Denton
and the requirements of the various Federal, State and local agencies
involved in the development of airport facilities, six specific
objectives are to be Achievedl
1. Determination of the extent, type and nature of development
required to satisfy future aviation demand at Denton
Municipal Airport.
2. Preparation of an Airport Master Plan for appropriate
development.
3. Integration of aviation planning into local, regional and
state comprehensive planning, and to establish basic land
use guidance for on &A ofr airport development.
4. Preparation of an analysis and assessment of environmental
impacts related to future airport activity.
5. Production of the documents in accordance with FAA Advisory
Circulars 150/5070-6, Airport Master Plans, and 150/5900-1B,
Planning Grant Program, and Orders 1050.1C and 5050.4, as
appropriate.
H. Results or Benefits Expected
In June of 1973, the City of Denton completed an airport master
plan for Denton Municipal Airport. The plan developed at that time
was based primarily on the existing needs of Denton and the surround-
ing area and provided basic airfield development concepts.
Since that time, however, dramatic changes have oocurred in the
urban area adjacent to the airport and in Dallas and Tarrant Counties,
which border of Den' on County on the south. Additionally, the air
space structure and environmental character in the area have changed
dramatically, and the opening of the Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Air-
port in 1974 has had a profound effect upon the entire north central
Texas region.
while the original 1973 master plLn attempted to address futura
airport development issues and provided forecasts of aviation activity
that were based upon traditional airport useage within the area► the
role of the airport appears to have changed dramatically, and it
appears that it is now on the threshold of very rapid expansion. A
n i
full instrument landing system (ILS) has been installed since the 1973
master plan was produced, and the anticipated closure of several
airports in the Fort Worth-Tarrant County area has increased the
probability that Denton Municipal Airport is a likely candidate to
become increasingly important as a reliever to the D/FW metropolitan
area. There is solid evidence that the airport's role in the future
will continue to eupand, both as an air service asset for the City of
Denton and as a reliever for the D/FW metropolitan area.
It is also evident that the increased urbanization around the
airport will become of increasing importance as the City of Denton and
south Denton County become more intensely developed. The City of
Denton has received incasing numbers of requests from developers and
other interested parties for land leases on airport property, some-
times as often as one or two per week.
It is anticipated that the results of the study effort proposed
will perms` the development of an updated airport master plan that
will be to for aviation activity at Denton over the next t
years. The study will also have secondary benefits as a focal point
in land use planning of the surrounding area. it is also anticipated
that the study will V.ovide viable economic data that will be useful
to the community. in assessing the economic contribution of the airport
to the local economy. Finally, the study will satisfy a genuine need
in providing guidance in the development of appropriate facilities on
an incremental basis with economic prudency.
III. APPROACH
The Task Descriptions found in the following pages describe the
intended approach to satisfy the objectives previously stated. The
Airport Master Plan will comply with applicable criteria, including
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5070-6. The Evironmental Assessment will
be enerally prepared inaooordance with FAA Orders 1050.1C, 5050.4 and
otbex applicable Federal, State and local requirements.
AIRPORT MASTER PIM STUDY
ENVLRONMERM ASSFS.SHW
DENTMN, TEXAS
TASK DESMPTIONS
Task 1 - Inventory, Data Collection and Review of Pertinent Documents
Charles Willis & Associates, Inc., will review existing pertinent
documents, including previous planning studies, and will collect
additional data essential to achieving the objectives of the Study.
Data collection will be comprehensive in scope, but. every effort will
be made to avoid the collection of superfluous or unnecessary
information. Information sources will include the Federal Aviation
Administration, the Texas Aeronautics Commission, the appropriate
state, county, and city offices, the universities in the area, and
other sources as required. Dq*Asis will be placed on local inquiry
and investigation to develop this information.
A survey and inventory of existing airport facilities will be
undertaken. The purpose of this effort will be to find basic data
that will be useful in determining the future role of the facilities
in the airport development program. It should be emphasized that the
inventory and survey will not be detailed in nature, and will develop
only sufficient information to develop primary judgements relative to
future airport development. No soil borings or subsurface
investigations will be conducted.
Special emphasis will be placed upon determination of the Airport's
historical relationship to the community and the surrounding area, and
its role in the system of airports in the vicinity.
The review and data collection effort will be a continuing function
throughout the course of the Study.
Task 2 - Aviation Demand Analysis and Activity Forecasts and DemwW
Capacity Ana ys s
Future facility requirements will be determined to a large extent by
traffic forecasts of aviation demand generated within the air trade
area serviced by Denton Municipal Airport. The forecasts will be
developed in specific categories, in five year increments over a 20-
year time period.
Forecasts will be developed in the following specific categoriesi
* Total-Aircraft Operations (annual, daily)
& General Aviation/Business Aircraft Operations (annual, daily)
}
Task 2 - continued
* Lns% ument Ap vcad-es (Annual, Daily)
* Local and Itinahrant gyrations (Annual, Daily)
* Aircraft Mix (1)
* Based Aircraft
Vehicular 't'raffic
(1) Forecasts of aircraft mix, essential for noise analysis and
capacity studies will also be developed.
In ftdition to preparation of basic demand forecasts, a capacity
,7nalysis of existing airport will be undertaken, and a determination
made of CIA adequacy of the existing runway configuration to acoomo-
date anticipated future activity or whether additional runway/airfield
capacity is needed. FAA Advisory CircuD r 150/5060-5 will be used for
the demand/.aparity analysis.
Task 3 - Boonomic Inpact Analysis
In order assess the direct and indirect economic impact of Denton
Municipal Airport on the economy of the City of Denton, a study will
be developed to present a basic analysis of the airport and it's
contribution to the local economy. The study will consist primarily
of the development of basic data which will developed through a series
of questionnaires. The questionnaires will be oompleted t!►rough the
efforts of selected city staff and civic groups such as Chamber of
Commerce, Jaycees, etc. An effort will be made to utilize those
groups and individuals who are objective and do not have a basic
direct interest in aviation so that bias in the study may be avoided
The following six questionnaires will be prepared for use in
development of 1^asic data needed for economic assessment. The
questionnaires will provide basic data regarding the airport and the
economy,
1, EmPl Wt Data. Q:estionnaire 1 will completed by each employee
of the on 'za`tiria directly involved with the airport, such as
FBO's, etc. Th!a questionnaire should be administered by the
airport managot
24 zational 22ea Benefit Data. Questionnaire 2 will be cam-
ple~te~t ee local head ofd organization directly invr,,md
with the airports
3. Pilot Aircraft %gEator Eaftse Ratio. Questictmire 3 will be
adMinister6d by the airport manager.
4s Businesses located at or near Questionnaire 4 will be
distrDEM to the head o business organization located at
r
S^
the airport or adjacent industrial areas.
5. Tourism and Conventions. Questionnaire 5 will be completed by tic,
approriate local government organization (if in existence) or by
the local Chamber of Commerce or similar organization.
6. Economic Development. Questionnaire 6 will be completed by the
local Industrial Development Commission or similar public body.
Alternatively, -the data may be available through the Chamber of
Commerce or similar organization.
The Questionnaires may be modified to account for unique local situa-
tions so that all the essential elements will be coverts to +J* v r-
vey, it will provide basic data on direct employment, local goods and
services purchased, and tax revs-nues generated. it will also provide
data from which the airport's role as: (1) an attraction to new busi-
ness and industry, (2) the indirect contribution to the total area
economy, and (3) a stimulus to tourism may be determined,
Task 4 - Primary Facility Requirements
It will be necessary to determine facility requirements to satisfy
short, intermediate, and long-range aviation needs. It is prudent to
establish basic facility requirements early in the planning process,
and work performed in this task will be based upon the demand/capeity
developed in Task 2. This will produce a basic facility development
program in terms of space required, functional considerations, move-
ment of aircraft, airspace and operational considerations such as
runways requireed, levels of aircraft activity, etc.
The facility requirements will be identified for airport purposes only
and will not include any assessment of facility requirements for other
purposes, i.e., municipal functions or commercial development
unrelated to aviation.
Upon co^:~lQt!.oR of this task, tea enerali2ed :crea;= required for
initial, intermediate, and ultimate airport facility development will
be known.
Task 5 - Analysis of Constraints to Airport Development
This task will consist of examination of major constraints to airport
development and will be used to define basic airport development
parameters. Emphasis will be placed upon integration of airport
development efforts into local comprehensive planning. The study
effort will be limited to the area in the immediate vicinity of the
airport and will include studies of the followings
* The identification of areas of probable incompatible land
use, both current and anticipated.
1v
Task 5 - continued
* Physical contraints,resulting Fran nonaviation activities
currently or planned to operate on the airport, and
limitations imposed by inadequate or nonexistent utilities,
drainage, etc.
* Operaticial constraints such as the potential effects of
noise, obstructions, airspace limitations, expansion
limitations, etc.
* Legislative, jurisdictional, and regulatory constraints
which may affect the extent to which the airport may 1xi
developed.
* zoning, as it relates to air transportation facilities3
with special attention given to identification of any con-
straints on use, or development of property,
It is our unders,,;anding that no critical physical problems (such as
drainage, floodplain encroachment, eta) exist within current airport
property; however, studies will be made to identify any specific:
physical shortcomings, and generalize recommendations will be providerl
to improve land utilizatirin for aviation and oaMatible land uses.
Task 6 - Land Uso and Furn~tional Plans
An overall plan for on-airport development will be prepared. nw plan
will ident!,fy those areas to be used for aviation related purposes,
such as terminal facilities, aircraft maintenance, clear zones, etc.r
as well as recreational facilities, industrial sites, and other
improvesnenta compatible with and appropriate to airport locations.
Special attention will be given to beneficial land uses that will
serve to enhance the airport image as a good neighbor, and to those
activities capable of generafiir revenues that can be used for airport
purposes. Detailed design within development areas will not be
included in the master plan; however, it is anticipated that at least
the following items will be addresseds
* Land required for existing and future aviation needs,
specifically general aviation, and fixed base operations.
Recommendations for land use under noise exposure areas.
* Identification of existing and unconstrained future land
use patterns in the area adjacent to and surrounding the
airport*
Wrelopment of alternative compatibility schemes.
Task 6 - continued
* Recommendation of a preferred alternative plan, develop-
ment of it into a plan, and submission of the plan for adop-
tion.
The land use plan for the airport and its environs must be compatible
with local comprehensive planning and will be coordinated with the
objectives, policies, and programs for the City.
A noise analysis utilizing the required contours, as specified in FAA
01rder and 5050.4 will be provided and utilized in the preparation of
tha report.
It will be necessary to review and evaluate existing plans,
ordinances, and regulations to determine local planning goals,
objectives, and policies, and to determine applicability of local
ordinances to ensure land use oarrpatibility with the atrport.
It must be emphasized that this task will not be an ex2iaustive study
of the legal questions involved in zoning or irplementing other land
use control strategies. It will, however, itentify the needs for
these controls, recommend the land use to be in plemented and provide
detailed information relative to other attempts to establish land use
controls in similar airport situations. Primary guidance for the land
use plan will be modified criteria it Federal Notation Administration
Advisory Circular AC 150/5050-6, Airport Land Ui~a Compatibility Plan-
ning.
An Interim Report is suggested at the completion of Task 6, with a
public participation meeting held to present conclusions and reoommen-
dations thus far developed.
Task 7 - Airport Layout Plan
The existing Airport Layout Plan will be updated an,] revised In
a
ccordance with the Master Plan developed in previous tasks. It will
include the initial intermediate and ultimate configuration for run-
ways, taxiways, aprons, areas for terminal development and other
essential facilities. Clear zones, approach areas and other airspace
features will be shown on a recommended airspace zoning crap, prepared
in accordance with FAR Part 77. Development of the plan will be
closely coordinated with the FAA and the City of Denton.
Task 8 - Terminal Area Plans
The Terminal Area Plan is a companion document to the Airport Layout
Plan drawing and as such represents a relatively detailed layout of
facilities that exist or are planned to be developed in the terminal
area. The Plan should function as a primary working document in the
Task 8 - oontinued
development of basic facility layout$ the development of leases or for
other purposes that require larger scale drawings than the ALP. It's
development should evolve primarily from current and anticipated air
field development plans, land use criteria$ as established in the
Airport layout Plan, and land use plans, and upon the City's interest
in terminal area development.
Task 8 - continued
The plan will show recommended locations for such facilities as
terminal expansions, hangars and other service buildings; aircraft
parking and tie-down areas; and other facilities as required.
Task 9 - Envirneasntal Study
The Environmental studies for this project will not likely be exten-
sive, due to the probable character of future traffic at Denton
Municipal Airport; however, full consideration must be given to envi-
rora%ental factors which may be affected by airport development. These
factors must be carefully evaluated and analyzed by the environmental
specialists, to identify any adverse environmental effects that may
result from the proposed facility. Included in the review will be at
least the following considerations:
A. Purpose and Need
B. Proposed Project
C. Alternatives
D. Affected awironmere.
E. Environmental Consequences - the following specific impact
categories will be included:
Noise Analysis
A noise analysis will be provided. The required contours,
as specified in FAA Order 5050.4 will be utilized.
Compatible Land Use
Land use in the vicinity of the proposed development will be
analyzed to determine existing and future compatibility with
airport operationys.
Assessment of Social Iapacts
Task 9 - continued
An evaluation will be undertaken to determine if the pro-
posed action may have adverse social or community impacts.
Induced Socioeconomic Impacts
An estimation of the effects of any induced socioeconomic
impacts will be accomplished and ino..uded.
Air Quality
Air quality will be e::amined by estimating the pollutant
impact of proposed action in terms of existing and forecast
operations.
Water Quality
Impacts on water quality will be examined and will include
suffi~:ient description of design, mitigation measures, and
crn.truction controls applicable to the proposal to demon-
strate that State water quality standards and any Federal,
State and local permit requirements be met.
Department of Transportation, 4 (F)
A determination will be made as to whether any public park,
recreation areas, wildlife and water-fowl refuges, and
historic sites or other areas of natural scenic beauty of
local, state or national significance will be affected by
this project.
Biotic Communities (Including Both Flora and Fauna)
The impact of the proposed action upon the Biotic
Communities will be assessed and a Biological Assessment
Survey undertaken. A qualified biologist will be retained
to conduct the sarvey.
4xdangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna
In accordance with Section 7 of the Hrdangered Species Act
Amendments of 1978, endangered and threatened species of
flora and fauna in the vicinity of the proposed development
will be identified and evaluated to determine what effects
the proposes action will have on their habitat.
Historical and Archeological Impact
Task 4 - continued
Areas of historical - or archeological significance that may
be affectf_d by the proposed project will be identified by
using national, state and local records and agencies and an
on-site survey will be conducted.
Natural Concerns
An evaluation will be made to determine whether the proposed
action will affect such natural areas as floodplains,
wetlands, coastal areas, prime and unique farmlar,,d and
acreages providing energy supplies or natural resources.
Light Daissions
An evaluation of the annoyance or danger of eiisting or
future aviation on airport lighting will be accomplished.
Construction Impacts
The short and long terra impacts of the construction of the I
proposed project will be evaluated.
She extent of these impacts will be determined and measures
to lessen these impacts will be suggeste!,
Solid Waste Lrpact
it will be determined if a significant amount of additional
solid waste will be produced as a result of the proposed
project.
Alternatives Considered
A summary description of each alternative consideration will
be provided, briefly discussing and defining the issues.
F. Enviznnmental Cavmxpenoes - Other Considerations
Upon the completion, the environmental review will be
submitted for IAA oonsideration.
Task 10 bevelopnent Schedule and Financial Plan
Of the many benefits of a Master Planning Study, the development of
sdadules and cost estimates for implementing the planned improvements
is one of the most significant.
Task 10 - continued
This information is a valuable tool in planning capital expenditures
incumbent to any improvements project. The development schedules will
be presented to clearly 'define the improvement schedule and
;ustification for each reccne-ndation.
The financial plan will include an estimate of r:apital investment
along with a schedule of improvements proposed in the Master Plan,
The development schedules will be based upon the short, intermediate,
and long term needs as developed in the Master Flan,
Finally, there will be an analysis of possible funding sources
including general obligation bonds, revenue bondsl federal funding
sources, and the possible infusion of private funding for certain
airport improvements.
Task 11 - Preparation and Production of Study Documents
Upon completion of the Study, twenty copies of the Draft Final Report
and full size prints of the Airport Layout Plan will be submitted for
review and comment. This Report will contain all pertinent
conclctisions, recommendations, and substantiating data, and all
nec.asary drawings and diagrams.
Upon approval by the City, the Federal Aviation Administration, and
other agencies, if required, fifty copies of the rinal Report
documents will be printed and delivered within thirty days. original
work, including Airport Layout Plan drawinge, will become the
property of the sponsor and will be delivered at completion of the
assignment.
Production of other kinds of reports, promotional or informational
material, etc., may be negotiated by the City.
SCHEDULE
Approximately five months will be required to prepare the proposed
Airport Master Plan and Environmental Assessment in final draft form.
This time period is based upon the assumption that there will be no
excessive delays caused by reviews by the City, the FAA, etc„ and
also is based upon the assumption that public hearings held in
connection with the study will take place after the study has been
prepared in final draft.
PUBLIC MEETINGS AND tWUMS
During the course of the study, at least one public information
meeting will be held, preferably at the completion of Trask 6, and
combination public information meeting and public hearing will be held
at the completion of the Airport Master Plan and the Environmental
Assessment. The point at which the public information meeting is to
be held will be coordinated with the FAA and the City of Denton.
There will also be work sessions held and information reports made to
the Airport Board and the City Council as required.
GDOGPAPHIC LCCATION
As shown in the location We the Airport is located approximately one
and .jne half miles west of Interstate 35 and four miles southwest of
the city center.
FORCE ACCC(Rr REMT JUSTIFICATION
No force account will be used in this study, however in kind
contributions to offset $3,100.00 of the local share will be provided
by the City.
AVnMZED REPRESEMTION
The authorized representative of the City of Denton in matters
relating to their application is Still Angelo, Assistant to the
Director of Public works,City bail, Denton, Texas, 76201, (817) 566-
8200
c T
DENTON '
D,ENTON MUNICIP
APPQRT
p„ f _ r
a
I ~
w
y r «
• 1~
~ 1.
i
dr i
r. J
pop I NW4 01
• ti
north
.1
_ r:: v~ SCALE IN 4NAM
Location Map Denton, Texas
06PARTMINT Of TRANSPORTATION
01011 AL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCES
IFOA USE WITH PLANNING GRANT APPLICATIONI
The City of Denton business enierpnses will be afforded full oppor•
tunity to submit bids in response to this inviialion
(hereinafter referred In as the "Sponsor") HEREBY AGREES and wOl not be discriminated against on the
THAT as a condition to receiving any Federal financial assist. grounds of race, color, or national origin in
once from the Department of Transponation, II will comply consideration for an award.
with Title VI of the Civa Rights Act of 1964, 78 SIAL 252, 4:
U.S C. 2000d42 U.S.C. 2000d4 (hereinafter referred to as the 3. That the Sponsor shall inert the clauses of Appendix
Act), and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, A of this assurance In every contract subject to the Act and
Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation. the Regulations.
Subtitle A, 0Mce of the Secretary, Part 21. NondiscAmination
in Federolly•Assisted Programs of the Department of 4. That this assurance obligates the Sponsor for the
Transportation-Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to
Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Reptitions) and the program.
other pertinent directives, to the end that In accordance with
the Act, Regulations, and other pertinent directives, no person S. The Sponsor shall provide for such methods of
in the United States shall, on the grounds of rice, color, or adminislration for the program as are found by the Secretary
national origin, be excluded from participalion in, be denied of Transportation or the official to whom he delegates 4w&
the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other spoetsor,
under any program or acilvit) for which the sponsor receives subgrantees, contractors, subcontractor, Gansferees,
Federal finiiI assistance fr3m the Department of Trans. successors in interest, and other participants of Federal
portation, Including the Feder t Aviation Administration, and futanctoi assistance under Such program will comply with oil
HEREBY GIVES ASSURAW E THAT it will promptly take requirements imposed or pursuanl to the Act, the Regulations
any measures necessary to r 7ertuate this agreement. This and this assurance.
assurance Is required by subs_tion 21.7(x)(1) of the Regula•
lions.
6. The Sponsor agrees that the United Stateshas a tight
more specifically and with it limiting the above general to seek judicul enforcement with regard to any matter arising
assurance, the Sponsor heret gives the following specif c as. under the Act, the Regulations, and this assurmtY.
surances with respect to its PI vning Grant Program. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the
I. That the purpose of c4 taining any and all Federal grants, loans,
Sponsor .4rees that each "program," as contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assist.
defined in subsections 21.23 s) and 21.23(b) of the Regulr once extended after the date hereof to the Sponsor by the
tiont, writ be (with regard .o a "program") conducti4 in Department of Transportation under the Planning Gran) Pro-
compliance with all requirerrv nts imposed by, or pursuant to. gram and is binding on it, other recipients, subgtantees,
the Regulations. contractors, subcontractors, tronsferees, successor In Interest
and other participants in the Planning Gant Program. The
2, That the Sponsors all insert the following notifies. person or persons whose signsturet appear below are au.
Lion in all solicitations for by ;for work or material subject to thorized to sign this aswance on behalf of the Sponsor.
the Regulations and made connection with all Planning
Grant Program and, In ads led form, in dl proposals for
negotiated agreements:
DATED-
The Sponsor, In :cordmce with Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act, 1964, 79 Still. 252, 42 U.S.C. ri Hart City ana er
20006 to 2000d• and Title 49, Code of Federal Sponsor) 1
Regulations, I parlmem i Transportation,
Subtitle A, Offict -f the Secretary, Pan 21, Nom b
discrimination in :edetallysuisted programs of (Signature o uthori ed fie )
the Department c 'rsnsportation issued putsuar,l
to such Act, here- notifies all bidders that it will
affirmatively insu- that in any eoulroct entered
Into pursuant G this adverUstmeni, minority
FAA Form 69604 (3.72) sat AMENOIx A ON AIVtAN
COST SUI/MRI
OENTON, TEMS
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND
EMKIROMtKTAI ASSESSMENT
TASK 1 TASK I TASK 3 TASK 4 TASK 6 TASK 6 TASK I TASK a TASI 1 TASK 10 TASK 11
Inventory forecasts Ecenmtc Facility Constraints stn/ line layout Plan , Ttnlml Env1n Ateotal Financial Study Tom
Iepsct Study Mgrtrran is Amiysls Flan M Ana plan Stely Flan Owwats
IYnpouer Nmrly
Classlftcatlon Win 111 ANT MN ANT MI ANY MI NIT MN ANT NM AMT MN AMT MI ANT W AMT M ANT MN AMT NN AIR
Principal $66.00 6 $1106 10 40 11 1112 4 IS21 1 $521 6 13% 6 1191 1 $521 16 $1,0% 1t 4194 '6 1116
96 U JU
Sr. Plaamr/
U91mer $41.00 it $1016 It IS13 12 $516 It $516 1 1364 1 1314 10 1410 10 $410 64 $t,S91 14 Me 10 1460 164
51,472
En'Imer1
planmr 140.00 20 ON 30 111,200 24 6960 24 $660 24 5960 1 $310 22 14e4 it $444 60 $2,400 14 $640 it 1400 2SO
$Ie,000
TocAatclan 924.00 20 $560 12 $3u 10 $210 10 (110 It 1136 It $336 24 1411 10 $210 60 $1,660 20 $560 It
SIX 202 $5.656
Clerical $11.50 1 $140 10 $111 It $110 10 11t1S / $140 4 610 4 170 4 $70 14 1420 6 1140 24 1420 114 62.030
NI scellanwus
Eapensa 1100 $100 300 1100 Shoo $420 $2.220
Archaaloglcal
1141091 cal
Survey ON NOO
Miles" $60 $60 660 $60 $60 $300
In Kind
Services $3,100 63.100
. . .
Total K $2,632 14 $3,047 10 $3,114 64 12,111 60 12,501 X 14,606 66 $1,4101 44 11,136 114 19,900 it $1,900 6t $2,1it 130 IJ6.S44
Hourly rates are based upon raw salary plus so overboad rate of 1101
M lacludet $3,100 it•btnd coatrlbutloo by the City of Denton
Olio ANhvrl Ni0. 11-MOiLJs
MERA!' ASSISTANCE L AFB :T CAM
~~rr I~G►tIICATION ASIA. DAR Two"
ACTION ®A►/UCAiION CATKIN r e , r••• •.w e,r
Illmy rs [1 NMV11CATIC.Y Of IMUIT (OOy c.... 1! lao It
I i'.► REP11RT OF FtW;OAl ACM NU%b
r IE:LII A7rlICANT/R[CIPIENT I. FEo AI EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.
City of Denton 75-6000514-W
Ord:rludN %thI1 City
r, rlfrH/F,D, Iu rRa Nuslbra b Il 10I 31
II It. ub Denton comb , Denton GNAtt 14 TITu
i L Slits I Texas e. 21► ww 76201 r ft *L
cr.ba Few (N.mw Bill Angelo Caddo) ATP
'M+ N~•1 I { 817) 566-8200
x+ 7, llTit ANO Otk dfPTION Of A►/LICANTS Fit RET
Airport Master Plan and S TYPE OF APPi1CANT/RECIMEN-T
Environmental Assessment -'Denton Kinicipal + I_ ~MTF,~
Airport
saw o"ropwar Harm
I- TYPE Of AUISTANCE
A-Ibi1 W Wastes"
wr.ww told t-0tw Sam
1 16 AREA OF ►IIOJtCT Ikt• ;Foil it I Ntk4 rrwy,~ IL t MATED M. IL TYr[ 01 AlPL1CATION
E ~
1j South Denton l~g _Qr~ NS 444 C-1:8114111111
North Tarrant & North Dallas Count es N 0 a•Iil.omrs D rMI+ go" "id"Or" Sodium
_ ► po"D ruN01N0 11. C"GRLSSIONAL 018TAICTO OFI IL TYPE O OE Iror Aft W It#)
j FrOt
34,691- ,01 L AWCW 26 L HORCI F-0Ibo 48POWr11
aSTAtt T .855 .a orlwlA N/A
gym' lTATt .00 II. -N Y ITAIIT u. 11 J two
W
%loc~ aitl9 ~r ~u~N x.mtSa Ali r)
r. OT411 00 11 CE i 7bil'TTEt rnr mwlA Lr to. EXISTING FEOERAL IDENTIFICATION NUIrOtR
Lt TOTAL FtOUAL ► 19
M. fEOERAL AGtNOY TO RECEIVE RLQUtST INdUC C(1 l 411 nbl 31- ItiM XS ADDED
i FAA, Southwest Region, P,O,BOX 189, Fort Wort,'-,Texas, 76101 YN
Ig he
ro/.b To Is 1b1 bW of •r lalmlrlp lad MttM, I. II Isar y I CIM1W H! Ull r~ k"'w MMt1rr, rnTrlM V r/
i TH2 W1 rrMtllbirNM/11fllatlM It1 1T~I b M4 dwlr0lwwr aq fill In
148 lWUL w /rrrl:ut Pod bon APp ication has been submie"o the ` rrvmu R
ArrucA21T Idly It w pwmw b/b to
1 j THAT SEt sowwd &w wmkw w" ~ N w w" w- m Central Response Council
yi 1IGbeefor- 0 Q
!f 1. TYRO NAPE ANO TIM
REPRE• N0 G. Chris Hartung ISO L DATE aNINtO r
I ; :ENTATIYE City Manager 1! S y ~z
! 21. AGENCY NAME "UCA- row I& tN
[C IVID It 2L OR"1411ATIONAL UNIT _ if. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE pt~ALA~~u GT1ON
roLNTI/ICATIIIN
{ ~29.
~ IbEr1T1FICATION
31, ACTION TAKEN 3& rUNO1NG row VWA 410 P111. I. Yw oWA RyI
Q A. "A"E0 L FtOIQ }S. ACTION DAM Do p10 OVAL ~~~p~~{~ ATE NCI!
3 b REIECKa LAM KART !L 00N~1~~:W j%M n INF r« soosm /q"
i d r. REN11Nt0 FOR L ITA 00 N NG
AYt1 WVIT C W& 40 !f. REMARKS AOOED
= A W111111" AWN I ~co 0 11 y0 FEp _Y66-
L 19 fM
1, 4
-IM /EOtRAL AOtNCf II W
A N /w bM11 ~rNww M P~It I pNNM A rtf, b /p,M j p 6071col
Art! ACT" ~Np~p /p
r2/-101 writ
I'.a1rOd 1 7MIPd J~M424 M I 10;
EN OF' TRAN310ttTAT10N►'tyID1RAL AVIATION ADMIMIS7RA110N
PART I) oMo No. oo.no lea
PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION
Item
Doc' This assistance request require State, local, Name of Governing Body
leg onal, at other priority rating? Priority Rating
_ Yes X No
Item 2.
Does this assistance request require State, or local Nome of Agency or
advisory, educational or health clearances? Board
Yes X No (Attach Documentation)
Item 3.
Doe' this assistance request require clearinghouse (Attach Comments)
acv ew in accordance with OMB Circular A•95?
x Yes uo
i
Item 4.
Does this assistance request require State, local, Nome of Approving Agency
regional or other planning approval? Yes X No '
Date S.
the proposed kajoct covered by an approved compre• Checlt one: State
+Icnstvc plan? Local
Regional j i
Yes X No Location of Pion
irem 6.
will the assistance requested serve a Federal Nome of Federal Installation
stallorian? Yes ---No Federal Population benefiting from Project
!+em 7,
,+'lll the assistance requested be an Federal land or Nome of Federal Installation-_.
+tstollation7 Location of Federal Land
Yns X No Percent of Project _
;I ern 8.
Will the ossislance requested have an impact or effect Site instructions for additional information to be
the environment? provided.
Yes X No
tem 9. Number of:
Will the assistance requested'capse the displacement Individuals
of individuals, families, businesses, at farms? Families
Businesses
Yes Z No Forms
licm 1
is there other totaled assistance on this project previous, See instructions for additional information to be
pending, or anticipated? provided.
Yet- y..,No
FAA Foom 5f00.101 teh7p rU/lift-1 s IAA /011; WWI ANO WWI P~,~
OEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. F:OtRAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION o.n •.o as •+ue
PART III - BUDGET INFORMATION
SECTION A - BUDGET SUMMARY
Gr•M Prgrer•, - - [Nlerered u"Wite4d Fid. y. Now of R..I,rd B•f,er'.w
F~Ien r.dsrel
1 Ce1e1s, No.
Fednd Nsrrfederel felerel - NenFederd «_Te+d
Aelr
~L~l --_--1~~----•-- - -------i`l-- - - -----Idl---._--. t.] lL.------ 1t1___
I, AIP 20.103 s S s 34,691 S 31,855 S 38,546
1.
3.
1.
5. TOTALS S S S S S
SECTION B - BUDGET CATEGORIES
. GsM Pr egrem. fvntrhn ee Ae N. U,
F, Ohierl Class C4lRones
IIl 11IP
D, Fr,nge Benelds
c. TI.TVe1
d. F.pupment
Supplies
1. Contractual 38,546 38,546
Construction
h. Olher
1. Total Direcl Chafes _ IBM- 38A46
1. Indl led Choi
w. TOTAL% t 38,546 S s s s 38,546
t. Ploll am Income S S S !
FAA l6An S10Q.161 will furtRSaott rAk wr1M 1416.1 A110 14ao.1 ~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSFORTATION. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ow 100. f*+Ilra
SECTION C - NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES
(o) G.6ee hMromm MI APOLICANT (f) STATE (1) Of Ka SOURCES (d TOTALS
1 S s 3,855.00 -o- -o- I 3h855.00
Ila.
II
la TOTALS s 3,855.00 s ! 3,855.00
SECTION D - FORECASTED CASH NEEDS '
Toll IV lot vow lit Owatof 2.4 O. 1" 0."..
1 s f
i FfWAL
If N. hln.l ~J . . .00
IS TOTAL 1 38,546.00 1 1 27,546,00 S 1
SECTION E - BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF THE PROJECT
f~1 Omer 01 M FUTURE FUNDING 011011003ITEARS
re IPIR11 WSICOND 14) THIRD lolFOURTN
is.
IT.
All. it.
_
20. TOTALS - S S S 1
SECTION F - OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION
IAIfnA Nlul.n.l SI~~11 N N.e/1/MrT
!l OM/d CArpl:
r
TeIWl1 CA~rllit
R~wu11r
See Attached Sheets
PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE {AI(ath paI IA%f#UCIIOA)
MINUTES
CITY OF DENTON
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
FEBRUARY 11, 19?S
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY
11, 1985s AT 12:00 NOON9 IN THE CIVIL DEFENSE ROOM OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Arno, Carrell, Garland, Hayward, Keith, Smith, Wright
MEMBERS ABSENT: none
OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Frank Strickler of Fox-51; Mr. Bob Hunter, Mr. Bill
Angelo and Mr. Clint Lynch of the City Staff
1. The Board considered the minutes of the regular meeting of December 12,
1984. A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes as written.
The motion carries unanimously.
2. The Board considered Mr. Frank Strickier's request to lease an additional
5,500 square feet of Airport property immediately adjacent to his present
airport lease property. Mr. Keith requested that the City's contingency
plans to allow aircraft access to the property to the east of Mr. Strickler's
lease property be spelled out now to avoid any problems in the future,
With the assurance that lanquage to that effect would be included in the
lease amendment, a motioi was made and seconded to/approve Mr. Strickler's
request for additional property, The motion carried unanimously.
3. The Board considered Mr. Frank Strickler's plans and specifications for
a new hangar to be built :south of Fox-51's present hangar. Mr. Lynch
reported that the FAA had reviewed and approved the location of the
hangar and that Mv, Doyle of the Building Inspections Department was
presently reviewing the plans for City ordinance and code requirements.
A motion was made and seconded to recommend to the City Council the
approval of Mr. Strickler's plans contingent on the issuance of a
building permit by the Building Inspections Department. The motion
carried unanimously.
4. The Board considered the contract between the City of Denton and Charles
Willis and Associates for the Master Plan Study and Environmental Impact
Assessment of the Denton Municipal Airport. It was noted that a provision
for City in-kind services was not included in the contract. After I-ome
discussion, a motion was made to recommend to the City Council the .3ccept-
ance and execution of the contract with Charles Willis and Associates
pending an understanding with Charles Willis allowing Cit in-kind services.
The motion carried unanimously.
5. The Board considered the proposed Airport Lease Agreement between the City
of Denton and Mr. Benjamin Bennitt for a full fixed base operation on the
Denton Airport. Mr. Hayward expressed concern that the primary term of the
lease should not exceed 20 years. A motion was made and seconded to recomm-
end to the City Council the approval of Mr, Bennitt lease pending his accept-
ance of a maxim;u 20 year primary term, The motion carried unanimously,
6. The Board mat in executive session at lt30 P.M,, to discuss real estate and
legal matters. The Board reconvened in open session at 2115 PAM,
With no further b-isiness, the Board adjourned at 211S P.M,
~ r• I l i a. t. , a"h
r
/01
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY ARTICLE III
OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON$
TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A POLICE RESERVE FORCE; PROVIDING FOR MANNER
OF APPOINTMENT, MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS AND STATUS OF POLICE
PESERVE OFFICERS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That Article III of Chapter 18 of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended and reenacted in
its entirety to hereafter read as follows:
ARTICLE III. Police Reserve Force
Section 18-16. Purpose
I
The purpose of this article is to provide a trained group of
volunteer personnel which will be available to supplement the
regular police force as deemed nee-asary by the Chief of Police.
Section 18-17. Creatrd
Pursuant to the authority of Article 998a., V.T.C.S., there
is hereby created and established a Police Reserve Force of the
City to be organized, trained and utilized in accordance with
the provisions of this article.
Section 18-18. Minimum Qualifications
Members of the Police Reserve Force shall meet the minimum
qualifications and standards of training for policy reserve
officers established by the Commission on Law Enforcement
Officer Standards and Education pursuant to Article 4413 (29aa),
V.T.C.S., as amended.
Section 18-19. Appointment
Members of the Police Reserve Force shall be appointed at
the discretion of the Chief of Police and, subject to the
provisions of Section 18-20, shall d., -•e as peace officers
during the actual discharge of official duties.
PAGE 1
rv r z r v,. r.
c
Section 18-20. Powers; Limitations
No person appointed to the Police Reserve Force may carry a
weapon or otherwise act as a peace officer until the person has
been approved by resolution of the City Council. After
approval, police reserve officers may carry a weapon only when
authorized by the Chief of Police and when discharging official
duties as a duly constituted peace officer. Police Reserve
Officers, when approved pursuant to this article and when acting
during the actual discharge of official duties, shall have the
powers and authority of a peace officer, including the power of
arrest; provided, however, the power of arrest aay be limited or
restricted by the Chief of Police as deemed necessary through
Rubs and Regulations of the Police Reserve Force.
Section 18-21. Uniform and Insignia
The members of the Police Reserve Force shall wear such
uniforos as the Chief of Police may authorize. Identification
cards and appropriate insignia may be issued by the Chief of
Police and shall be returned upon termination of nembership in
the Police Reserve Force.
Section 18-22. Compensation
Members of the Police Reserve Force shall serve without
compensation except during scheduled special events declared by
the chi-If of Police to be a threat to the peace and general
safety of the citizen, of the community when the regular police
force is not sufficient in number to control the event. During
such events, members of the Police Reserve Force shall be paid
uniform compensation based solely upon the time served while in
the performance of official duties. Nothing in this section
shall prohibit the Police Reserve Force from accepting cootrf-
buti or donations for services rendered to organizations or
groups pursuant to Section 18-25 of this article.
PAGE 2
y
Section 18-23. Reimbursement for Training
Members of the Police Reserve Force assigned to police
training may be roimburaed for tuition cost, and travel expenses
in accordance with written regulations promulgated by the Chief
of Police.
Section 18-24. Death Benefits
Reserve officers shall be eligible for death benefits as
provided by Article 6228f., V.T.C.S., as amended. No reserve
officer shall be considered an employee of the City for any
purp,)se and shall not be eligible to receive medical, hospital
nor pension benefits.
Section 18.25. Authority to Receive Funds
The Police Reserve Force is hereby authorized to receive
funds fr^u any source and the Chief of Police shall issue
appropriate regulations for the receipt and disbursement of any
auch funds.
Section 18-26 through 18-30 Reserved
SECTION 11.
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such hollin,g sh-111 n,t affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, bereby declares it
would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such
invalidity.
SECTION III.
That all. ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with
the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
PAGE 3
=mod
"tR o-• A' w W~ il.':Y Ji ii 'Y iS j'2
SECTION IV.
That this ordinance shell become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWARTp MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLENO CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTONo TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONI TEXAS
BY:
IT
I
i
PAGE 4
DATE:
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0: ~tayor and Members of the City Council .11-90
FROM: Chris Hartungt City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution Approval
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of resolutions authorizing grant applications for continued funding
SU'SMARY:
BACKGROUND:
'this project is designed to reduce juvenile crime through stronger enforcement
efforts and by increasing efforts toward prevention of juvenile crime by
working closely with schools and youth organizations of the City.
PROGRASS, GEPAR:`IEN S OR GROUPS_AFFECTED.
Juvenile Officer Project
FISCAL VIPACT:
$26,612 (local funding)
Respectful y subm'tted:
Ciii r i s 3r ung
City 64aYkager
i1 as fd c~~ x
T 1 t i e LZG~l~. t~Qlr✓
Title
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council of the City of Denton
to authorize the submission of an application to the Texas Criminal
Justice Division requesting funding for a Juvenile Police Officer
to augment the City's Juvenile Law Enforcement Program; and
WHEREAS, Article 4413 (32a), V.T.C.S. was amended to enable
the Criminal Justice Division of the State of Texas to allocate
grants and administer criminal justice programs on a statewide
level; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is cligible to receive such funds
and desires to promote the public safety and well-being of its
citizens through increasing the effectis~eness of the Denton Police
Department in its law enforcement relating to juveniles; NOW
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, certifies
that the City is eligible to receive a funding allocation fro* the
Texas Criminal Justice Division for a Juvenile Police Officer to
augment the City's Juvenile Lax Enforcement Program and hereby
authorizes the staff to submit an application for such funds.
SECTION II.
That the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City
Manager, or his designee, to represent and act on behalf of the
City of Denton in working with the Criminal Justice Division in
rei;ard to such grant application.
SECTION III.
That a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division and the North Texas Central Council of
Governments.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,tTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
my tiw~.~ . 4 .26 e y~ t Y t iq "..t
DATE:
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution Approval
RECOIVENPAT I ON :
Approval of resolutions authorizing grant applications for continued funding
SUMMARY:
BACKGROUND:
This project Is designed to promote the prevention of crime through various
programs which inform, train and involve citizens in the latest methods of
crime prevention.
PROGRk1S, DEPARi`1F!N";S OR GkOUPS AFFECTED.
Crime Prevention Program
F ISCAL 1`4PA','T:
$32,067 (local fundir a
i~~i teu:
kesrectfuiiN sub
yl~J •
G', iris 1~a~fting -
i.~ LY ' 31 sger
P '~i4t'7.J -
Na
T i t l e 0,c6 w. C4,00r ea.~
Title
ce-
4 F .;off o a...
R£ S O L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council of the City of Denton
to authorize the submission of en application to the Texas Criminal
Justice Division requesting funding for the City's Crime Prevention
Program; and
WHEREAS, Article 4413 (32a), V.T.C.S. was amended to enable
the Criminal Justice Division of the State of Texas to allocate
grants and administer criminal justice programs on a statewide
level; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such funds
and desires to protect the safety and well-being of its citizens
through the reduction of crime; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, certifies
that the City is eligible to receive a funding allocation from the
Texas Criminal Justice Division for the City's Crime Prevention
Program and hereby authorizes the staff to submit an application
for such funds.
SECTION It.
That the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City
Manager, or his designee, to represent and act on behalf of the
City of Denton in working with the Criminal Justice Division in
regard to such grant application.
SECTION III.
That a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division and the North Texas Central Council of
Governments.
PASF.t70 AND APPROVED this the day of , :985.
R3 URW ,
CITY OF DEIITON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
LHARM ALLEN, CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
fW
DATE! 2/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
i~
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council J FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution to Amend the Fox-51 Airport Lease
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Board to approve the
additional amendment to the Airport Lease Agreement of July 1, 1980,
between the City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited, permitting Mr. Frank
Strickler to lease an additional 5,500 square feet of Airport property.
SUMtARY AND BACKGROUND
The City Council on January 9, 1985, approved Mr. Frank Strickler's
request to leasq additional property on the airport for the purpose
of constructing a hangar to the south of his existing hangar. In
further developing the plansfor the hangar, it was found that an
additional 5 feet of property adjacent to and immediately to the
west of Mr. Strickler's property, and 20 feet of property adjacent
to and immediately to the east of Mr. Strickler's property would
be required. These to peices,5 x 220 and 20 x 220 totalling 5,500
square feet,are outlined on the attached drawing.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
This adjustment to Mr. Strickler's lease should not effect any other
department or group.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Airport revenues will be increased by at least $192.50 per year, wit;i
nc cost to the General Fund.
Prepared by: Respectfully Submitted:
Clint Lynch a dwo
Airport Manager G. Chris Hartuvg
City Manager
Approved b~y:~
Bill eio `
8
u. < t :wm 5 ~'9
.r
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the ,Pity of Denton leases land upon the Denton
Municipal Airport to Fox-51 Limited by lease agreement dated July
1, 1980; and
WHEREAS, Fox-51 Limited, acting by and through its President
lease additionall propertyanonrtheS'AirpBort sett th ree and one-half
cents per square foot per year for the purpose of building an
aircraft hangar and related aircraft ramp; and
WHEREAS, during subsequent planning and development of that
hangar it was found that an additional 5,500 square feet of
property is required to accommodate the needs of Fox-51 Limited;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
believes it to be in the interest of efficient Airport Operations
to lease additional property to Fox-51 Limited; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
The attached amendment to the airy-rt lease agreement of July
1, 1980 between the City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited is hereby
approve.
SECTION II.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the attached
amendment on behalf of the City and the City Secretary is hereby
directed t affix this Resolution,
agthe reement executed aJ lye1,
to the o original airport lease with
1980, inscribing on the original agreement the fact it has been
amended and the effective date of such amendment.
SECTION III.
The Resolution passed and approved on January 150 1985 which
amended the airoort lease with Fox-S1, Limited is hereby rescinded.
SECTION IV.
This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its passage
and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICWD 0. AYU
CITY CF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALL TARY
CITY OF DENTON0 TEXAS ,
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Of fDENTON, TEXAS
BY: 1~rW^" ~.la.r
,r
0987L
y
i
1 ~
AMENDMENT TO AIRPORT LEASE AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF DENTON § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The City of Dentcn, Texas, hereinafter referred to as Lessor,
and Fox-51 Limited, hereinafter referred to as Lessee, do hereby
mutually agree as follows:
I. Subparagraph A of Paragraph I of the airport agreement
dated July 1, 1980, between Lessor and Lessee is hereby
amended to read as follows:
A. Land:
A 100 x 200 foot tract of land, being approximately 20,000
square feet, and a 165 x 220 foot tract of land, being
approximately 36,300 square feet, having a combined area of
approximately 56,300 square feet or 1.29 acres, described
as follows:
COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as
conveyed to P. F. Breen by deed recorded in Volume 127,
Page 185 of the Deed Records of Keaton County, Texas said
point lying in the South right of ray line of FM Road 1515;
THENCE vest along the south right of way line of FM Road
1513 a distance of 350 feet to a point;
THENCE north along the west right of way line of FM Road
1515 a distance of 1,000 feet to a point;
THENCE west perpendicular to said right of way line of FM
1515 a distance of 870 feet, more or less, to a point on
the east edge of the pavement of the north taxiway;
THENCE north 13°50'41" west along the east edge of pavement
of said north taxiway a distance of 10 feet to a point for
a corner;
THENCE north 76°09'19" east perpendicular to said east edgy
of pavement a distance of 175 feet to the point of beginn-
ing;
THENCE north 13°50'41" west 175 feet east of and parallel
to said east edge of pavement a distance of 220 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE north 76°09'19" east perpendicular to said east edge
of pavement a distance of 5 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 13°50'41" vest 180 feet east of and parallel
to said east edge of pavement a distance of 200 feet for a
point for a corner;
THENCE north 76°09'19" east perpendicular to said east edge
of pavement a distance of l00 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE south 13°50'41" east 280 feet east of and parallel
to said east edge of pavement a distance of 200 feet to a
point for a corner;
PACE 1
7 V
i
1
Y
THENCE north 76°09"19" east perpendicular tc said east
edge of pavement a distance of 60 feet to a point for a
corner;
THENCE south 13°50'41" east 340 feet east of and parallel
to said east edge of pavement a distance of 220 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE south 76°09'19" west perpendicular to said east
edge of pavement a distance of 165 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 56,300 square feet of land, more
or less, as shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
2. Subparagraph A of Paragraph Ili of the airport agreement
dated July 1, 1980, between Lessor and Lessee is hereby
amended to read as follows:
A. LAND RENTAL:
$1,970.50 per year, payable annually in advance on the
first day cf February each year during the term of this
agreement or, at the option of the Lessee, payable in
monthly installaents as follows: the first monthly
payment due on the first day of February, 1985, to the
sum of $164.20 and equai monthly installments thereafter
in the sum of $164.20 in advance, on or before the first
day of each and every month during the tern of this
agreement. It is expressly understood and agreed that
the yearly rental for the land herein leased shall be
readjusted at the end of each fire (5) year period during
the term of this lease, (the first such readjustment
occurring July 1, 1985), up or down, on the basis of the
proportion that the then current United States Cost of
Living Index for the Dallas/Fort {Worth, Texas Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Area, as compiled by the U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, bears to
the June, 1980, index which was 256.4 (1967 • 100). The
land rental amount is now based upon .035 dolidrs (3.5
cents) per square foot per year for the Iced herein
leased and it is expressly understood and agreed that the
rental increase or decrease, if any, for each five (5)
year rental adjustment under this lease shall not exceed
fifty (50x) percent of the annual rental of One Thousand
Nine Hundred Seventy Dollars and Fifty Cents ($1,970.50).
3. Subparagraph (7) of Paragraph XV of the airport agreement
dated July 1, 1980, between Lessor and Lessee relating to
the right to lease additional property is hereby deleted
because the Lessee has exercised this right through this
lease amendment.
4. Paragraph XV, SPECIAL CONDITIONS, is hereby amended by
adding a new su6paragrapi to read as follows:
(10) Lessee shall be provided access to the property
leased hereunder either through access "A" or access
""B", at Lessor"s discretion, as shown on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference. Lessor reserves the right to change
Lessee's means of ingress and egress from one
designated access to another at Lessor's option.
PAGE 2
4 is '.1 f F f } T ; ..1 V T. r tl. F Lx }
EXECUTED this day of , 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, LESSOR
BY:
RICHkRD 0. STEWART$ MAYOR
ATTEST:
ALLEN, CHARLOTTE
fITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOL D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNiY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: IdMw.
FOX-51 LIMITED, LESSEE
BY:
F. D. STRICKLERs PRESIDE4T
THE STATE TEXAS 4
COUNTY OF •n?:ON 4
Before me, the undersigned authority, in and for said County,
Texas, on this date personally Appeared F. D. Strickler, known to
me to be the person and office: whos4d name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that the same was the
act of the said Fox•51 Limited, a corporation of the State of
Texas, and that he executed the same as the. act of said corporation
for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the
capacity therein stated.
Given under my hand and seal of office this d,:y of
1985.
MARY ~2VB
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
My Commission expires:
PAGE 3
S J rk t 4, x~
f r
X1 S11 we AX1WA'~
~X%S-T
1 N c'
1
100'
r r
r• '
r• ~
5'
1
Zoo
2CI
,
1
1
0h4
a
SJN1
a.
MINUTES
CITY OF DENTON
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
FEBRUARY 11, 1985
I
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY
11, 1985, AT 12:00 NOON9 IN THE CIVIL DEFENSE ROOM OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING,
MEMBERS PRESENT: Arno, Carrell, Garland, Hayward, Keith, Smith, Wright
MEMBERS ABSENT: none
OTHEPS PRESENT: Mr. Frank Strickler of Fox-51; Mr. Bob Hunter, Mr. Bill
Angelo and Mr. Clint Lynch of the City Staff
1. The Board considered the minutes of the regular meeting of December 12,
19£4. A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes as written.
The motion carries unanimously.
2. The Board considered Mr. Frank Strickler's request to lease an additional
5,500 square feet of Airport property immediately adjacent to his present
airport lease property. Mr. Keith requested that the City's contingency
plans to allow aircraft access to the property to the east of Mr. Strickler's
lease property be spelled out now to avoid any problems in the future.
With the assurance that lanquage to that effect would be included in the
lease amendment, a motion was made and seconded to/approve Mr. Strickler's
request for additional property. The motion carried unanimously.
3. The Board considered Mr. Frank Strickler's plans and specifications for
a new hangar to be built south of Fox-51's present hangar. Mr. Lynch
reported that the FAA had reviewed and approved the location of the
hangar and that Mr. Doyle of the Building Inspections Department was
presently reviewing the plans for City ordinance and code requirements.
A motion was made and seconded to recommend to the City Council the
approval of Mr. Strickler's plans contingent on the issuance of a
building permit by the Building Inspections Department. 91.+e motion
carried unanimously.
4. The Board considered tha contract between the City of Denton and Charles
Willis and Associates for the Master Plan Study and Environmental Impact
Assessment of the Denton Municipal Airport. It was noted that a provision
for City in-kind services was not included in the contract. After some
diacussion, a motiou was made to recommend to the City Council the accept-
ance and execution of the contract with Charles Willis and Associates
pending an understanding with Charles Willis allowing City in-kind services.
The motion carried unanimously.
5. The Board considered the proposed Airport Lease Agreement between the City
of Denton aid Mr. Benjamin Bennitt for a full fixed base operation on the
Denton Airport. Mr. Hayward expressed concern that the primary term of the
Wise should not exceed 20 years. A motion was made and seconded to recomm-
end to the City Council the approval of Mr. Bennitt lease pending his accept-
.%nce of a maximum 20 dear primary term. The motion carried cnanimouuly.
b. The Board met in executive session at 1:30 P.M., to discuss real estate and
legal matters. The Board reconvened in open session at 2:15 P.M.
With no further business, the Board adjourned at 2:15 P.M.
iP. . r
yDATEt 2/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
tj • -*OD.
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
q
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution to Approve Plans and Specifications for Fox-51 Hangar
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the. Airport Advisory Board to approve the
Plans and Specifications for the proposed construction of an aircraft
hangar and related office, st-)rage and ramp facilities for Fox-51 Limited.
Sutt4ARY,
Mr. Frank Strickler proposed to build a 100 x 100 foot Boyd Industry aircraft
hangar, brown and white in color, with a 21 x 100 foot office lean to on
the vest side, and of the same type of material and construction as his
present hangar. This hangar would be located to the south, fur.ag Mr.
Strickler's present hangar as outlined on the attached ,drawing.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council on January 9, 1985, approved Mr. Strickler's request to
lease additional property on the airport :or the purpose of constructing
a hangar and related ramp facility to the south of his existing hangar.
Plans for that hangar have now been submitted to atkd reviewed by the
appropriate Gity Departments, the Airport Advisory Board, the Federal
Aviation Administration and the City Staff. The Fox-53 Airport Lease
Agreement requires the final City Council approval of the plans and
specifications, the estimated costs of such construction and to the
agreed estimated life of the building before construction may commerce.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
This construction should not effect any other program, department or group.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This construction will support additional activities on the airport, with
no cost to the General Fund,
Prepared by: Respectfully Submitted:
Clint Lynch Q,
Airport Manager G. u
City Manager
Approved by: 7
r
Bill An elo
-i • !'F .I . ":...1 r *r n K rw' r ~ ~ y.. ~ M ~ Y.ni 1 "lid.{ ~ ~ a .4n f.'~KM ~
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has leased land upon the Denton
Municipal Airport to Fox-51 Limited by lease agreement dated
July 1, 1980; and
WHEREAS, Fox-51 Limited desires to construct a 100 X 1+2
foot aircraft hangar and related office, storage and ramp
facilities upon the leased premises; and
WHEKEASI the lease agreement ?rovides that the plans and
specifications and the location of the improvements, the
estimated cost of such construction, and the agreed estimated
life of such structure be approved by the City Council of the
City of Denton before any such construction may commence; and
WHEREAS, the plans acid specifications, the location and the
estimated cost and life of such construction have been reviewed
by the appropriate offices of the City staff and the Airport
Advisory Board and found to be in compliance with applicable
City Ordinances and policies; NOW, THLAEFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
The plans and specifications for the proposed construction
of an airport hangar and related office, storage and ramp
facilities by Fox-51 Limited, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference, at the location shown thereon, are hereby
approved.
SECTION II.
The estimated cost of such construction of $60,330.30 (and
the estimated life of the proposed structure of tnirt
years is hereby approved.
SECTION III.
s e-so ution shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
I E
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONj TEXAS
BYibl~c~i
_ - ~ F xoS i 1 NG i AX+,NA'l
_ EX15~ING
}~ANGAa
100
^ ~ r
2V
i
i
~yl
1
t
Cb~N14
:.'xC:K;~Ipp~.... is .~'rw _
77
MINUTES
CITY OF DENTON
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
FEBRUARY Ill 1985
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CIT`: OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY
11, 19850 AT 12:00 NOON9 TN THE CIVIL DEFENSE ROOM OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Arno, Carrell, Garland, Hayward, Keith, Smith, Wright
MEMBERS ABSENT; none
OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Frank Strickler of Fox-51; Mr. Bob Hunter, Mr. Bill
If Angelo and Mr. Clint Lynch of the City Staff
1. The Board considered the minutes of the regular meeting of December 12,
1984. A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes as written.
The motion carries unanimously.
2. The Board considered Mr. Frank Strickler's request to lease an additional
5,500 square feet of Airport property immediately adjacent to his present
airport lease property. Mr. Keith requested that the City's contingency
plans to allow aircraft access to the property to the east of Mr. Strickler's
lease property be spelled out now to avoid any problems in the future.
With the assurance that lanquage t6 that effect would be included in the
lease amendment, a motion was made and seconded to/approve Mr. Strickler's
request for additional property. The motion carried unanimously.
3. The Board considered Mr. Frank Strickler's plans and specifications for
a new hangar to be built south of Fox-51's present hanosr. Mr. Lynch
reported that the FAA had reviewed and approved the location of the
hangar and that Mr. Doyle of the Building Inspections Department was
presently reviewing the pltns for City ordinance and code requirements.
A motion was made and seco-. ded to recommend to the City Council the
approval of Mr. Strickler's plans contingent on the issuance of a
building permit by the Building Inspections Department. The motion
carried unanimously.
4. The Board considered the contract between the City of Denton and Charles
Willis and Associates for the Master Plan Study and Environmental Impact
Assessment of the Denton Municipal Airport. It was noted that a provision
for City in-bind services was not included it. the contract. After some
discussion, a motion was made to recommend to the City Council the accept-
ance and execution of the contract with Charles Willis and Associates
pending an understeading with Charles Willis allowing City in-kind services.
The motion carried unanimously.
5. The Board considered the proposed Airport Lease Agreement between the City
of Denton and Mr. Benjamin Bennitt for a full fixed base operation on the
Denton Airport. Mr. Hayward expressed concern that the primary term of the
lease sho+,ld not exceed 20 years. A motion was made and seconded to recomm-
end to roe City Council the approval of Mr. Bennitt 'ease parading his accept-
ance t;. a maximum 20 year primary term. The motion tarried unanimously.
6. The Board met in executive session at 100 P.M., to discuss real estate and
logal matters. The Bcard reconvened in open session at 2:15 P.M.
With no further business, the Board adjourned at 2:15 P.M.
'048!L a
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the City Council of the ^ity of Denton, Texas, by
Ordinance No. , has created and established a Police Reserve
Force pursuant to rticle 998x.. V.T.C.S; and
WHEREAS, Article 998x., V.T.C.S., requires that the City
Council approve persons appointed to the Police Reserve Force
before those persons may carry a weapon or otherwise act as a
peace officer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best Interests
of the public safety and security of the citizens of Denton to
sathorize members of the Police Reserve Force to exercise the full
authority allowed by statute; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
Section I.
The following members of the Police Reserve Force are hereby
approved:
Pam Allen Kerry Jones
Mike Barrow Dana Kaisner
Art Behrens Chuck Kull
Linda Cagle John Lassiter
Alice Core Shirley Jean Le.wson
Louis He:th Robert Lockett
Brian Joseph Horn Ivey Prica
Ronald H. Hull Shep Scogin
Mike Hupp
Section It.
The members of the Police Reserve Force approved in Section I
hereof may carry weapons only when authorized by the Chief of
Police and when discharging official duties ss duly constituted
peace officers.
Section III.
This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985.
RICKARD 0. STEVARTO MAYOR
CITY OF 0FNTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARL;)TTE ALLEN CITY SECRETX"
CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LLCAL FORK:
A- Z-
P.51M R- HUNTER
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
P •tf + ✓February 19, 19'85
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
T0: MAYOR 4 MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Revision to the FY 85 Capital Improvements Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February 6, 1985,
recommended to the Council that the FY85 Capital Improvements
Program be approved as revised as proposed.
SUMMARY
The FY85 Capital Improvement Program has been revised (see Exhibit
I) to reflect a more realistic approach to current conditions. It
has also been updated to fund those CIP projects ft-om FY84 which
could not be constructed due to lack of bond funds last year. FY85
budgeted bond funds have not been exceeded. Use of current revenues
for capital projects have been reduced in order to help alleviate
the possible impact of increased energy costs due to the Texas
Municipal Power Agency failed generator.
BACKGROUND
In January 1984, the Utility Staff started planning the FY85 Capital
Improvements Program. This process involved forecasting needs and
priorities of new facilities for the City's water and wastewater
system. It was :nticipated that projects planned for FY84 could be
accomplished with 1984 issued bond funds. The projects for FY84
were, therefore, riot rescheduled into FY85 at that time since it was
anticipated that bond funds would be available.
Several FY85 current revenue projects have, therefore, been
substituted with several FY84 bond projects. City Engineer had
these FY84 projects designed and waiting. Due to the growth of the
city, it may be necessary to further revise the CIP as development
occurs.
It should be noted that some developers are "waiting" and have not
started construction thereby creating some uncertainty on when
"oversizing" funds will be required. The city engineer will design
projects rescheduled to FY85 and have the project designs ready in
the event oversize monies are not used this fiscal year by some
developers.
3467U:1
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
City of Denton, Benton Municipal Utilities, City Gngineer, Finance
Department, Engineers, Developers.
FISCAL IMPACT
A comparison of FY85 CIP budgeted amounts :s as follows:
-
~-SOURCE---{CIP:2/BS.--`CIP_10/84--I+(UNDERRUN)-~
BOND 1$4,950,044 =1=44,984.500 III$( 34,456) 1
REVENUE 175,161 402,061 (226,900) I
f AIC 3719426 3629987 80489
OTHER 72,22 f 22,229
EPA 9 0 I 0 l
TOTAL 1$5,568,860 j45,821;.17 J$(252,867) I
Prepared by: Respectfully subm'tted,
Srini Sundaramoorthy a &a$
6 David Naga G. Chris artu g
City Manager
Appcoyed: /
1L ~j + 1/
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Proposed Revised CIP FY 85
II Minutes of PUB Mtg of 2/6/85
34670:2
Public Utility Board Minutes
February 6, 1984
Page 4
fuel, plus 2/10 of a cent per KWH ror operating
maintenance. The total contract is expecting to bring in
about $8,750,000 for the Texas Municipal Power Pool which
includes Denton, Garland, Bryan, Greenville, and Brazos
Electric. Denton's share wc,uld be between 15 to 20
percent, Denton's share estimated presently at about 18
percent at tl,575,000 to the City of Denton.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed contract to sale
electrical generating capacity to Texas Utilities.
The Board asked staff whether this was going to be good for
the City of Denton. Mr, Nelson ►uggested that particularly
An the light of recent fAilure on the postponing the
Commanche Peak Plant that this money would help offset
other increases which may be necessary to the City of
Denton customers.
Ms. Boyd made a motion to recommend the contract with Texas
Utilities for the sale of excess capacity to the City
Council for adoption. Mr. Thompson seconded the motion,
all. "ayes" no "nays", motion carried.
9. CONSIDER BID OPENING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT
NUMBER -W-25 SPENCER ROAD PROJECT AND 85-W-I i00P
WATER.ij_1NE,-BID 19391
The project is intended to provide a 20" water line going
to Loop 288 from the existing water plant following Loop
288 north to McKinney Street and providing an 8" water line
from that line following Spencer Road. Utilities and the
City Engineering staff recommend award of the project to
Dickerson Construction Company, P. 0. Box 181, Celina,
Texas 75009 in the amount of 1486,522.
Staff Informed the Board that the difference between the
bid amount 1512,000 and the accepted bid amount of $486,522
was due to reduction in the requirements by the City on the
water line, such as the removal of 33 fire hydrants which
were in the original bid specifications. The 33 fire
hydrants will not be required since there is no development
in the area presently needing such hydrants. The future
developers will be required to place the fire hydrants as
they tie on.
Mr. Thompson made a motion to accept the staff proposal and
recommend to the City Council acceptance of bid of
Dickerson] Construction company in the amount of 1486,522.
Me. Boyd eeconded the motion, all "ayes" no "naye", motion
carried.
GF11AL 1tf1A AMI ?LAIN FUGAL 1113-- NOW 1 WE M11u
I.......I. -1.......-....1.....1
1
I?n3tct I I Carrot I MW IC+rrwt Wd-I+ I Nbr !EPA 11+t+i Ihtlu1+4 t 1 injects f
1 IM 1 Project tlwuilliw I tcti++b I Fwl IInoIM ICwtl+. I Ilr++t+.Iwed I Orrn+ IFrw I It+t+s 1
I I I I I I 1 I IE+tlwtr Ilowr") I I
,
I._
lMtr h+Ncllwt I t I I 1
1 ' I I I I I f t i I I
I I.............
11III-P-1 15a Mtr F,t+i I /111600 1 1111,110 1 61 1 N l fl 1 61 1 A231,11O I IN3,00I11++1 1Co+t+ Nilu+ W13 '115
1M4-3 IKK:f Real 041111+tlwtri+w U 111,611,611 111,611,161 1 641 61 1 61 1 61 111,31,10/ 1 111N,WiloA IN+ Tut lot 211 U011 E+tiullo 140,00
IMP-1 11&4r bit O+I+NIit+!Iy 1 03,10 t 141.601 601 $41 "1 "1 "1,116I 1 N INN Ild "1 ItrtN I
114494 ANNIO 1011"m 1 11,10 l 141 11,501 041 "1 111 ii,50 1 N INv II+t yet ItrtN I
100.1 KAO Wet Mlillc+tlr, 1 41 I N I "I 61 1 61 1 041 110,061 fliO,I0I11W IhOW to FI M 1
NM110-1 1FISIOW We FO10111+w 11 " s 13141? r 131,111 I "I I 1 I I 1 I t
I I- i-• 1 I I I "I Sol "I 110,101 1 122,111 IN" ICw+U Miles Fit 'is
1**4 Insidw Ntr h"Umm 111-••• I 121),)01 1 1211,110 1 661 1 1 1 1 t 1 1
IM-M-? IOwlwd 601190 I 121,10 I 00,6141 FI 1 N I N I "1 $0,001 131,01 IIo/ IMt IN ltrIN t
1**4 low" hisldA0 U44 I "I oil M 1 N! 141 61 1 $0,001 (III,II/Iiiftnl lOn+i to F1 (ti I
1*44 100) !thrive hq-IkU + No I 1311,04 t i361,01 I "1 141 61 1 61 1 131,111 1 IIN,0/ tlol tNlli+ W1 Cwlltt/ I
f t 1..... ..I.„........ I...._..I..~.. _I._.......1.......I............ I............I I
I li t l l Mtr hMrctlw t 11,111,512 111,01,112 1 now I 61 1 0 1 N s 11,11",30 I 11111,1011 1 I
I i
1 1 i I I l 1 1 I i 1 I t
I I I I t I t I 1 i 1 I I
t Iwtr Nlltrik4lwt I I I 1 I I I I I I t
1 1• 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 t
0*1 IOtllua/ IUtlll Mtrliw 1 102,11) t 11),411 1 61 1 0 1 61 1 61 1 0 t 113,411 IMM ICMIN Ni c"1N+ I
114.1 0MN tk 1001160 010,10 1 610,401 "1 Oil *1 61 1 61 1 1161,611 Ika IINS Iwi1w1 I
fN-!J 16Mrca1'•4IRINIOW Mtrllw t 13,3111 023,331 " 1 141 0 1 "I 61 1 123,311160 Icadl Mils ls
I
to++? tire" w'. i W riles I 111,311 ! 1141301 1 fit 141 61 1 If 1 61 1 111130 IMM I t
111 W IIIIr11A Itrwl NtrHw 1 111,116 1 19,2101 W I "1 61 1 lot N I Ili,)16 IMM I t
10+1 iiwh NrO+t NtrHw I 111,1" 1 116,199 1 HI "I "I N I lot 111,1" IMM I t
114#0 legalicA Nrwf Mtrllw I Ili ,l" t Ilt,l" 1 0 t 11 1 61 1 "1 " 1 111,10 Ik" I t
414+12 Isdr11A1 M Mick" 100 M I 111,111 1 wj" I O t III 0I lot lot 111,3" IM+1 Kash MOU, 10 'a
LAIl1Al 1011fi0(I17 Kill IIKAI NIS-- AIM 1 1111[114711
IMNct 1 1 Gant I NN ILrret IAII-I6 t k16r 1[/I 116111 I[1tiu1N 1 1 MNct1 1
1 U 1 Ir63Kt kWiltiK I [Itkull I Fad I16vK-+I Rmt1. I 1Irat6 twWod t Iw" [Fowl tt1t16 I
1 I[ItlNte I1Y116r161 I t »
.............I..... I--...-------- i
1 I .....»I........... I....._.._I
1
10+16 11.31 Irvin Aa6 Ntrl111 1 132,1% 1 113,16 1 1/ I Ago 11 1 14 1 $01 $",%0 INW IINSp 514 c"1610
IN+1 k1.rsin Mlrlkw I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 _ I
111.1.0 I 1111"1" AIM 1' t6 120, 1113 It 1 11,01 15,153 I 11 1 0 1 of 1 N 1 . 1 13I,1m11 Ik w thaw yA N 1100 'b
I
Ip+l/ I on 036161 Were 1' t6 6', 121 It I 12k,Hk 1 111,111 1 N I "I 14 1 "I I
113+K I min 111116 Ow r to or, 103 It 1 $6,311 1 14,311 1 641 "1 N I "1 • 1 14,30 INN Ilwlp 503 LI6ylN6 1
111#11 1 Oldw A$II Is to 11'1 00 It 1 141,W 1 N),N6 I 11 1 141 141 "1 . 1 111,0 tkw IIIII$6 363 L611I616
Ml+R I Lpw6 11NU1 M t6 t311 3111 It 1 $21,20 1 111,20 1 0 l 101 "1 "1 • 1 121,3% INN ISHIM toil Gr116tI I
IM+II I %*ra1 It Ir U 11's II'IN It I $)2,611 1 172,r•II 1 641 of I "I "I • I 11':,114 INN ING191 take" =
111+% I, Iri Mal r t6 W$ I* It 1 $0,1501 111,19 1 141 14 1 11111 14 1 • I 11,151 11mad ,Intp M 11111646 s
1 t t t S 1 I I
III+M 1 IrtlwM Gl 1' t6 it', 170 It
I I t1 h 1at63d,1 1 15,150 1 65,161 1 $1 1 14 1 641 "1 . I 0,151 IIW IIIItp 01 WOO i
IAS+II I YtA66N oil r (6 l2', 311 It 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I
1 I L It 1 l6M6161,1 { 11,301 11,314 ! too 141 "1 "1 . ; II,tM i1W iN11M iAU6w I
10+14 I MN1r MI H' U 114, lid It I 1 I I I I I I
I I It11v. U "I 1 113,4721 vI'm 1 14 1 "1 N i "I - i 113,112 `IIN Ilalp 311 cawlik1 1
1*+11 1 0661 Ink it, (6 I2', 3146 I! I 1 1 1 I 1
1 I 11x61/ Ira Is [6t6>rl 1 13342 1 13,111 1 111 041 "1 oil . I 13,142 IN66 INdlt 143 W441 I
MI+L I lillall pigs Is to 116, US It 1 014,101 Ik1,1N I lot 641 "1 "1 - 1 11$,10 1%61 IIwIM 311 Ug1111 t
0+14 1 AWISO Mrll 1r t6 lies me It 1 611.4a l 111,4251 141 N k "1 141 . 1 111,435 Ilwl Ilnlp 6aam t
Y+ 2314 It I 61,01A 1 14.06 1 Ago N I "I "I • I "j" I%w Ha116 t6stvtg a16t6f N 1
NH* I Wm U I
IM+I/ 1 16111 M11 r 11 II'6 71St It 1 131.131 1 I,331 I 14 1 14 1 N1 141 • 1 111,121 IM1 11n M
1l1~FN I Wnlw 146 111 1' U 14', IIM It I 113,01 I 143,650 l "1 141 H I "I • I 113,111 11661 '..r6$6rl} Aw611 i
IM+N I Iwlpl/ IMght6 r t6 120,wi it I 13,132 1 11,132 1 111 161 N I "I . I 13,112 111W. 1N61M IA6aa j
t
I Issue 1 f I A l 1.1 1A. 1 6321,1341 6322.7141 no "I "1 141 $131,111 I Il11s131 IMI I
I 1 . I I I I I I I I I I I
0+1 Imscollaaa IMlalim 1 111,111 I III,NI 1 "I "I 14 1 N t 111,114 1 N INN lbi 011 [l1rtN I
111+$ lbome I'r6irl/ Mrwl 3161ri16n I *1 141 "1 "1 14 1 141 $N,SII I 1131,3N1tA6v I "1s ft M ~
0+4 twat Wig Mr/It Nirlia6 I 14 1 16 t 14 1 114 1 "1 "1 N.M 1 to,INIIIn6 1
i
CAMIAI 10 04MI FLU Flltlt IIN•• IMHA 4111113 NIO
I. .I . .i.......... _1...._...... 1.......1......1..... .1....1. .........1. .t...1............. _ t
IPrIIKIY I ` I [molt I ow lCrrwt. LM-11 1 Atha Jim 11411 IFltlwtd I I Pr11Kt+ ,
I In I AyKt lowi0tlo1 I 1011•1t1 1 fw Ilovem IGaI,. I i6r1111 llowd 1 two IFw I (btu t
I 1 t I 1 I I I Illtlllto I1,Nor@A) I 1 , I
I... «...1.____..__ ..t._-------- 1............ 1.........t..._....t......... I.... a.I............ 1............t.....1.................. l
III5-w3 thlim C11Ir111 Wall r/trlIN 1 0 1 0I lot Sol oil 14 1 611,1001 IIII,1001IMef 1 t
1N44 Iwo" C01t1M Prot I1tr1111 I If I 14 1 11 1 11 1 0 1 11 1 035,30 1 1133,301 IA" I 1
IN+? 11100M Irllrlt West Mtorlllo I I I I I I I I I I I
.I l(Pro.ioesl7 Collin Wes41 I of 1 01 01 1 11 1 611 01 154,101 1 l154.Wll1w I '
10-1.1 IMOIot1 betwlrFdtes Is Wt I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I
1 Iftlorlies t 0 I "1 it 1 N I 14 1 14 1 10,010 l 110,willow I
10+0 Ilplla Allo01h1111 to Gil l.t. I "I N I "I "I H I H 1 154,00 1 1134,011IMr I t
10.111 t11011t1 Met Mite to tell I.t. I "I "I N t "1 01 H 1 124,10 1 1124,70116" 1 )
10+11 Ii01r0 tw4fellas WM 11A. 1 "1 641 01 I oil "I "I 111,70 1 (111,10111" 1 ' I
116*11 INVINO l rt1 Ilsr*4w es to I I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I NLiwdtF Wren 1 $0 1 11 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 14 1 1141020 1 18141,2001100 1 s
13#•13 II1lr lip, UM, I11r1 1 1331,420 1 H I N I/3u,4h I H I 0 1 IU2020 I 14,211 RIC 11161 Upsow I
l*+II IMIb C w"m 1 1123,1?I 1 "1 111."? 1 14 1 041,1231 14 1 1122,73 1 H IA" *144 ?!chose 7
0+15 11010 30 Wrlistam u••I I 1410,322 1 14",522 1 N 1 00 I to 1 H 1 1117,30 1 112n,13)11w thdly twill CesrtrKtles to Iqu 116'113 ,
10+N 14rtr hot Wrtln ••••«t 1 I 1 "1 "1 14 1 "1 122,001 1 1 1
1Nf1? 1111"1111 bNdlwll Awl t1 I I ! I I I I I I I ,
I I Ilrlief bMldl &tell1o I "I Sal 11 1 "1 14 1 14 1 11 1 It IAIC 1110,01 ,110114 fr11 M. ,1r1o, Cm.11 C1o1i111 I
0+0 If* 611111r cowl 10 Callow I 1)5,23/ I 115,231 I 11 I III N I N I Of 115,230 IIW I Im hll. hold bills Will I
10+19 00 M►IMo+ A/1r11 t0 hallat I 136,1001 030,10 1 "1 H ! N I "1 $41 134,10 I0M I ,es Frol. bats bill/ F11'0 +
MIF+31 lip bftldp mode t0 bllror I 13,151 I 1)1,1/1 1 $61 11 1 Sal 141 11 1 111,151 Ib4 I he Fr11. bills Iylls Will 1
0+11 1&111 We "at I Not I 111,11 I HI,W I "I "I N I "I $$I 111,111 11101 I 1111 pro). begin Iql t 116'1 f
0+32 Ko M It IMlrliw I IIS.W I 113,101 1 14 1 141 "1 041 1111 113,01 ll04 I be Prof. bolp bliss IWO t
*+33 "v iw $I Mali" 1 113,10 1 111,601 01 "1 oil N I 1 1 111,101 tlesl I Its Prof. blip bites F11'IS
3+34 mw Jr War Iwo bely 640 1 IN,01 I 1M.W 1 141 11 1 lot N I 11 131,01 load I IN Prol. blip bills 1111'0 s
I 1 I........ .I«........ I......... 1.......1........L•....I........ ..I I I
1 1 .31 t A l Wr N1trlMliM 111,111,352 1 14,NS,SU 1141,07 11211,420 t NI,n1 I N t 11,133,1}1 I 110,141 1 1
I I I 1 1 1 t I I I I I i
1 Ilrlo WN CMIKIINI I I I I I I I I I 1 1
yk.
[Null low4 t RALi Ft" I9I5-- mile 1 Nil Ulu
I.....~~I I......... ..I............I• »..I...----- I......... I.......I............I....__. I.....I.._......... r..........
Iholecl I I ceret 1 boo Icerwl Ilil-tf I KW IVA 11df1 IbkiwtN I I hflocto 1
I M I Project IncrlFllor I litigate 1 Fwf Itlfaws ItnfU. I 111roole Ibo,dd I I+frw if eel 1 ko111 1
I I 1 I I I I I Ihkiwle Ilb/errl I I !
I....... j 1............ 1............ 1......... 1......... 1......... 1....... 1..«..« .1... I...I......................... _ ,
1 1 I1i11. YI I •1 i
I i 1 t f I t l I t I 1 t
:4d-1 Real Fwio Street beerllks I 121,111 l 121,411 1 N t N 1 N 1 110 1 1t 1 111,111 Ileed teevlf free flu '141 ceeets bilks IRS t
IN+11 Ifrfrliee Aeloc liee I" NO I IIF,I" 1 111,104 1 N I N I N I of 1 N 1 111,104 Ik" INOW From Flu '041 Emig 1g1o/ SS I
I I I I I I I I I I I I r
ilS 1, ItMrille lnoNikso 1 1 t 1 t I I I I I 1
tl-e•N I (ef/y loin ISM 111 to Ir, 6"1 Ft 1 111,41 1 111,46 1 N 1 N 1 " 1 N : - 1 111,604 Ill" 11"191 IY,Ieow t
IWI-11 I looked Flaw tee 121 to tell 63% Ft I I I 1 I I I I I I 1
I I I Jim Fw• 1"111 AFU I I 111,204 I 131,111 1 0 1 04 1 11 1 04 1 - I 111,121 Ifm1 14m10 bSIN 121 'IS I
In-"c l 1eet43gr- 151 to 2110 1116 It I I I 1 I I I I I I
I I Maaslee bniy. 1 111942" 1 1104,111 1 161 04 1 04 1 0 1 - I IIII,1f5 Ibod I301r bkoow 1
10+11 1 bNwr Lint NO to 041, 104 ft I 111,41 1 6$6,04/ 1 04 1 "1 11 3 04 1 - 1 Ill,4N Neel Ibo1r blast t
Il 1-11 1 Lia1as We, 161 1o W. 54H Ft I I I I I i I I I I t
I I I Ch"IM 1 10 1 1 111,041 I 116,14 I 04 1 04 1 "1 N I - 1 111,110 Ibef Iln,p Was" r
NS•I-f I Idasot 111 to 134 W. 11ee, 15,41 FI 1 122,"1 1 12245" I t# 1 141 Ill Ill . 1 121,104 Reef llnlp in Wall t
1 I I I 1
I I ill 1111111L LS. tEIM19 I 1104,113 I 1291,hi I N I "I 04 1 " I 11",60 I Ii11,b1 I I 1
115.14 Ihudlasom bwlim 1 03010111111 IIt,046 I "I it I "I of 1 110,601 N heed ISd Id Started 1
111.5-1 Ilgtrc friAlicMry to W Mrllw 1 N I "I "I N I "I " 1 M,IN 1 10.4m m" New Is FIKd 1041 1
111-14 tioitoco Irklfr f to Myee hwrllw I of "I " 3 " 1 oil 0 14 14.001 iff,l"l Ibf 1 1 i
111 S 1 llNleco IrFMlbk Is Scritteo l.t. 1 04 1 " 1 641 "1 Ill 04 1 19,1" I Illt,l6111o t 1
11544 lAgloco fr,lbk to Iniftro I.L. I N I "1 141 "1 N I N I i1o,01 I 1S11,10411Mr I 1 t
Ik1.O Neer fqo I 135,4" 1 661 N I {16,01 1 04 1 If I 111,111 1 ",oil 041! ibloi 1106" 1
116-64 Mull 9"I font 1 11111241 " 1 1116.134 1 001 III,!" I 04 1 111,321 I N 111 IM14 PWCMM J
115-i•1 Ilmolm Linkor loo boorllM 1 0141,001 11414"1 1 N I N I " 1 141 1111,104 1 042,IN lhad lbilN 211 c "Ide I
IIS S II Iloilo M.MIhMleely ldreMtrl 1 IN.W 1 110.401 Ill "1 01 "1 411,1" 1 10 doe Irre Prol. Lid let stelae 4
111-1.11 Ilgluo lowly loo/IYluo to I I I I I I I I I I 1
I 8olleoforto West mWilas 1 04 i If $ N I oil 04 1 oil 1111,111 I 19104NI1lbw jb011 to IF M t
IMIML YrN'M Kill PIKAL IN/-• brit! 1 wrt Irro
Project I I Carol I low lariat INI-te I ttlwr We 110111 Itatjee+lel I I NOUN 1
1 Is I Project birw►Iltiw I I+tlwtf I had II1111M It"I. I Ilrwle PAIN" I lkwom Wood 1 Notes 1
I I I I I 1 t 1 it+llwte Itealereel 1 I t
3• .3. t.......... I_...._.._1. ...3......... 1----- _ .3 I..__. .3•-•---_...3 ....1...« 3
IWFI2 141loeer Nrwt lerrllw I 11",NI I f1N,N1 1 00 1 N I oil N I 111,"1 I $I loll" Reef fMx1p loll Avgbte t
I*+Il IM MMey NI Mrtlw 1 11O1N1 1 61"'m I 00 1 NJ 141 N I 110.001 III.IM IMI Illomp IN tegtete I
11!-1.11 141 NJw talc to M N I 111,111 I 16,/0 I N I N I MI 111 " 1 "I'M Ileef low pro). W. IN 1161M I
IN-1-I! 141. Ile IIIr Otto north I 1",111 I "1,110 I lot N I "I "I N I I0,N1 PAM low 141j. Walk Pat Natal 1
SWIM lMrrrt liar it" 1 I66,31 1 $4,01 N t "1 00o "I N I Aa,"1 IW Pere hell Mt IM Natal
I
I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I f
1 1 1._.........I........... 3.__....1...._...1.........1. _...3.».........I............I i I ,
1 11 1 I I 1 ewle Afar Wattled 111,23211/1 1 11,121,911 110,114 1131,111 1111,3" I "1 066,131 1 "",441 1 1
t t I I 1 I f I t I f 1
I lewll I+lr ireateeeli I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I
In-*I IM014 look 1w~ ly Kati" 1 0,601 0,601 oil "I N I 00 1 "bell 1 "$."1 lkw Ileelp $1 Ggtetr 1
111-eF2 lle►allae Me3=lnmwtl not I O1,9N 1 66 1231,911 I "1 Il t oil 1311"11 N lie Iowa$ (yowl I
INi1-3 IlwewUN 661 AiWeeltre 1xWNry I I I 1 I I I I I I 1
1 14120111 1 13,61 1 "1 13,66 I 0 1 141 "1 13,61 1 N 16" 3 ' I
IIS•*1 livable Npdr, MpMIPAew 11 I "1"$ 1 *1 It,t" I off lot %I O1N/ 1 N lbo I
W-110,41 Itrl brit} W I 121,"" I Ix,111 1 01I of 141 "1 $N,NI 1 N IAN I ' I
fttr*l "'1 Mom 1111 Role. 1 1211,30 1 s m.1" I N I *1 141 N I 6111,14 1 M1,3N 11x1 ltawte 1@086 Pd'N I
I I I I I t I 1 I t 01 I 1
I I to l i t h"a Atr 1rut, I I 1331,311 1 "1,N1 1 "1 " f 00 1 IW-,401 1 "31,1111 I 1
I I 1 t I I I I f I I 1 1
I t I I I I 1 I I I i I 1
I IMielelpl LaWatrrl I I 1 I I i I l I I 1
1 I-•-•-••••••••»-••-» 1 I I I I I I i I I 2
1114.1 Ilk le3xereewte I 13,10 1 "1 O,M1 1 0 61 041 0. 03,40 1 N lfrr Ihiy Iyw+M 1
IM4•2 Ilk 441++! t N,IN I #I N,NO I 00 1 01 A' 04,401 N l4r IMy iyeeeol 1
I I r t 1 I I I 1 I I I l 1 '.7~
i +1 I 1............1
..I I 1
t I I I I I A t 10401al u: r I 07,4001 lot n126.1 141 -06 r " 1 11,100 1. .41 . I 1
1 I l 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1
t" ioww1/111W I I I 1 l 1 t 1 1 1 1
t 3•••-•••-•-•• I I I I I' t I 1 I I f
104/1 IbarM 9diele 906 1 !!1,"1 I 131,/" I oil .1 1 N I N I NI,NI I N IMI limited ma 11111+te 1
101-IM-1 lead 1x1 I 111,110 1 125j" I "1 161 NJ 1101 0 1 111,111 Ifeel I%Wp III Mete I
1 I j.»........3«..........1._......3.........1........1.......1,...........3.........._1 I 1
I I I I t i t Mee". I 113,111 I 113,40 1 lot w Ii 1 N I *IoON I "hell l 1 1
' 1 I f l t I• f t i ! 1 1
I 11 t 111 l i 21 l 1 13.311,661 1 01931,141 1103,161 11111.116 1 112,!29 1 0 1 3181211111 t IN1/lkill I 1
77.r
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
February 12, 1985
Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesday, February 12, 1985, at 7:00 a.m. In the Civil Defense
Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items
will be considered:
7:00 a.m.
1. Receive the recommendation of the Bond Committee
regarding the proposed street bond election.
2. Consider setting a date for a street bond election.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hail of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1985 at o'clock
(a.m.) p 1
CI SECRETA
I
16470
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
February 12, 1985
Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesday, February 12, 1985, at 7x00 a.m. In the Civil Defense
Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items
will be considered:
7%00 a.m.
1. Receive the recommendation of the Pond Committee
regarding the proposed street bond election.
2. Consider setting a date for a street bond election.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of +M_ 1985 at o'clock
(a. m.
CITY SECRETARY
I~
1647C
z . _---r--.- x---T~171 -
~~P.,~tl Tr 'M PY
1'Q ~a
BOND MEETING MINUTES
The Bond Committee met last night, February 7, 1985. The
Committee reviewed the ranking done by individual
sub-committees and also the funding possibilities. A motion
was mede and seconded that the priority #1 listing be adopted
and $10,000,000 issue be recommended to the Council. The issue
would be tax free using funding strategy presented by John
McGrane. The Committee also recommended that the bond election
be held at soon as possible and no later than 90 days from now.
2111M
s
STREET STUDY RANKINGS li
Boundaries Street Distress
Street Name From To Costs Points
Hillcrest Scripture Emery 47,018 60
Avenue C Mulberry Oak 151798 44
Bolivar Congress University 4000S4 44
Kings Row Stuart Sherman 409445 44
Elm Prairie Highland 79899 46
Magnolia New Asphalt Hinkle 14944S 47
Elm Congress Oak 269S88 SO
Stuart Kings Row Coronado 34,667 S2
Elm Mulberry Prairie 15,798 SS
Hercules Picadilly Sheraton 170334 SS
Carroll Northridge Ross 299040 S7
Oak Austin Bolivar 170424 61
Hercules Redstone Stuart 26,400 62
Stuart Hercules Kings Row 23,112 66
Locust Hickory Oak S1628 42
Withers Oakland Mingo 17,334 43
Robinwood Emerson University 34,668 44
Paisley Woodford Hattie 8,08S 4S
Locust Oak McKinney 4,431 46
Paisley Frame Ruddell 1318S7 46
i
First Bolivar Locust 8,667 46
Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywood 40,445 47
Kings Row Sherman Yorkshire 23,118 49
Mockingbird McKinney Oriole 100' 28,889 S1
Locust McKinney Congress 151798 51
Emerson Freedom Wilsonwood 86,669 S2
Austin McKinney Mulberry 81666 53
Audra McKinney End of Divide 29,480 S4
Locust Mulberry Hickory 5,628 55
Mingo Withers Mockingbird 116,160 S8
Old North Road University Mill Pond 27,720 59
Frame RRX S. McKinney 17,424 61
Nottingham University Windsor 57,869 62
Greenwood Cherrywood Sherman 11,616 64
Locust University Sherman Drive 50662 64
Elm University Congress 551440 66
Paisley Hettie Ruddell 41356 66
Pertain Mingo Wayne 4,356 66
McCormick Parvin Willowwood 17,334 49
Hollyhill Ridgecrest Tennyson 63,557 51
Avenue D Highland IN-3S 149445 54
Hobson Lane Teasley FM-1830 509094 S6
Bonnie Brae Riney Windsor 3979876 75
Bonnie Brae Windsor University 301,557 77
Bonnie Brae University Scripture 8999984 90
Scripture I11-3S Bonnie Brae 47,907 99
West Oak IH-3S Y 207,876 114
-IIickory Avenue C Bonnie Brae 372,479 72
Oak Bolivar Jagoe 461,440 70
Hickory Avenue C Welch 200,547 72
i
Magnolia New Asphalt Bolivar 176,991 74
Bolivar Northridge University 471,615 76
Fry Scripture Oak 113,740 78
Stuart Selene Hercules 123,595 78
Hickory Carroll Cedar lOS,04S 79
Welch Mulberry Hickory 539694 79
Pershing Stuart Atlas 79,020 97
Avenue C 111-35 Mulberry 556,781 85
Locust Sherman Orr 473,218 79
Audra End of Divide Paisley 610244 83
Glenwood Windsor University 387,739 8S
Avenue A Highland McCormick 210,028 75
Acme Bernard Fort Worth Dr. 61,302 94
Elm Highland Eagle 314,516 85
Locust Eagle Mulberry 47,916 S7
West Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe 321,29S 71
Congress Oakland Ponder 550176 69
Hickory Cedar Austin 116,950 74
Teasley Lane Dallas Drive Ryan Road 190000000
Locust Congress University 682,095 82
Total Street Cost for Rank M1 $9,735,044
2101M
t r ,lA• a-- n nJ Y- ;;e,~ ;i
1777-1
. $1.020001000
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
PROPOSED GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
SERIES 1985
DATED: May 1, 1985 FIRST CPN DUE: 5/l/86
PRINCIPAL DUE: 5/1 INTEREST DUE: 5/1 11/1
YEAR
END CURRENT THIS $10,000,000 ISSUE GRAND TOTAL
9/30 REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS
1985 $ 21318,907 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,318,907
1986 2,158,025 500,OUO 1,475,000 1,975,000 4,133,025
1987 2,027,857 5009000 925,UUO 194259000 3,452,851
1988 1,961,906 500,000 875,000 1,3759000 3,342,900
1989 2,333,3c2 5000000 8259000 1,3[5,000 3,b58,322
1990 19642,146 6000000 775,000 1,275,000 2,917,145
1991 1,566,813 500,000 725,000 1,2259000 2,791,813
1992 19482,269 500,000 675,000 1,176,000 2,657,269
1993 1,421,719 500,000 6251000 191259000 2.540,719
1994 1,389,062 5000000 575,000 1,015,000 2,464,062
1995 1,224,283 500,000 525,UOU 1,0259000 2,249,283
1996 1,165,256 500,000 475,000 975,UOU 2,140,256
1997 982,688 500,000 425,000 925,000 1,907,688
1998 6329938 500,0OU 375,000 875,000 1,507,938
1999 597,626 50U,000 s25,000 825,000 1,422,026
2000 5629126 5001000 215,000 775,000 1,337026
2001 307,813 5001000 225,000 715,000 1,032,813
2002 284x688 500,000 175,000 675,000 959,688
2003 261,561 5000000 1252000 625,000 88b9563
2004 0 5000000 75,000 5751000 5752000
2005 0 500,000 25,000 525,0005250000
$24,x279006 $IO,0009000 $10,5OO,U00 $2U,500,000 $44,8271006
4
INTEREST CALCULATED AT 10.0% FOR PURPOSES OF ILLUSTRATION.
1984/85 Taxable Assessed Valuation $111540036,258
Average Annual Requirements, 1986/2005:
New Debt $1,026,000
JFMcG:ab
1358F
0032F
a
r
.r
k
BOND SALE REQUIREMENTS ($1090009000)
YEAR
END BEGINNING INTEREST* $.02 FROM TAX ENDING
9/30 SERVICE BALANCE EARNINGS OPERATIONS COLLECTIONS BALANCE
1985 $2,318,907 $2850826 $502,000 $213,000 (2,2539063 $934,982
1986 4,133,025 934,982 5502000 143,000 214759942 70,899
1987 3,452,857 709899 3959000 2679000 2,7209441 483
1988 3,342,906 483 200,000 293,000 21989,085 139.662
Iv89 3,66893[2 139,597 105,000 3232000 302849257 193,597
1990 29917,145 - 0 0 - -
1991 2,791,813 - 0 0 - -
1992 2,657,269 - 0 0 - -
1993 2,546,719 - 0 0 - -
1994 2,464,062 - 0 0 - -
1995 2,249,283 - 0 0 - -
* Earnings are based on a five-year program witn a $2,000,000 projected
yearly expenditure.
ADDITIONAL TAX INFORMATION
DEBT SER►iCE
FOR EVERY
YIELD FROM 51,0001000 OF
TAX INCREASES _ DEBT ISSUED
ANNUAL
YEAR $.01 $.02 REQUIREMENT
1985 $1060500 $213,000 $ 0
1966 1210500 2430000 197,500
1987 133,500 2671000 1420500
1988 146,500 293,500 1319500
1989 1611500 3231UOO 132$00
JFMcG.,cb
1361F
0032F
POPULATION BY DISTRICTS
(AS PER 1980 CENSUS AND INCLUDED IN ORDINANCE 82-100)
DISTRICT 1 206.02 - 2,044
207 - 762
208 - 47
209 - 493
210 - 3,689
211 - 1,835
212 - 2,578
213 - 427
11,875
DISTRICT 2 205.01 - 4,308
205.02 - 2,994
206.01 - 865
206,02 - 1,947
12,114
DISTRICT 3 204.01 - 773
204.02 - 21944
204.03 - 3,575
206.01 - 29598
207 - 2,122
12,012
DISTRICT 4 203.01 - 3
203.02 - 27
208 - 1,663
209 - 2,803
210 - 1,669
213 - 5,594
214 - 275
217 - 28
12,062
0690)
„'r ,'e ~ ,'Y r 4~' ; ~ o;• 'Y 1 r .a n r,.
CITY OF DENTON
POPULATION BY SINGLE NEHBBR DISTRICTS
(Revised 02/19/85)
DISTRICT 1
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
206,02 2,094 19722 168 5 2 197
207 762 605 64 3 36 54
208 47 43 0 0 0 4
209 493 388 74 0 6 25
210 3,689 2,935 505 8 62 179
211 1,a55 1,456 186 11 15 167
212 21578 558 1,990 5 1 24
213 433 374 25 4 0 30
Total 11,931 89081 3,012 36 122 680
Percentage 67.75 25.3% 0.3% 160% 5.7%
Option 1
Omit 207 (Blks 402, 409, 410)
309 216 45 1 12 35
New Totals 11,622 7,865 2,967 35 110 645
Percentage 67.7% 25.5% 0.3% 0.9% 5.6%
Option 2
Omit 206.02 (Elks 608, 609, 610)
67 35 5 2 0 25
New Totals 11,864 89046 3,007 34 122 655
Percentage 67.8% 25.4% 0.3% 1.0% 5.5%
DISTRICT 2
Census
Tract Population Vhite Black Indian Asian Other
205.01 4008 4,036 143 7 13 109
205.02 4,994 4,808 85 21 24 56
206,Oi 865 822 4 5 8 26
206,02 1,897 1,724 97 3 31 42
Total 129064 11,390 329 36 76 233
Percentage 94,4% 207% 0,3% 0,6% 2.0%
No options
t T s W F.}r" 51 .~utl tin T+f~'~~4~IY~v'fT
POPULATION BY SIN DISTRICTS
(02/19/85)
PAGE 2
DISTRICT 3
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
204.01 773 725 18 1 1 28
204.02 2,944 2,847 22 3 14 58
204.03 3,575 39454 22 9 18 72
206,01 2.598 2,030 361 9 67 131
207 21122 1,756 149 5 86 126
Total 12,012 100812 572 27 186 415
Percentage 90.0% 4.84 0.24 1.54 3.5%
Otpion1
207 (Adding Bike 402, 409, 410)
309 216 45 1 12 35
New Totals 12,321 11,028 617 28 198 450
Percentage 89.54 5.04 0.24 1.64 3.74
Option 2
206.02 (Adding Bike 608o 609, 61
2 0 25
7 35 5
New Totals 12,079 10,847 577 29 186 440
Percentage 39.a% 4.94 0.24 1.5% 3.6%
DISTRICT 4
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
203.01 3 3 0 0 0 0
203.02 27 27 0 0 0 0
208 1,663 19503 43 19 2 96
209 2,803 1,961 509 9 38 286
210 1,669 1516 67 9 9 68
213 5,588 5,229 207 23 32 97
214 275 263 3 2 0 7
217.01 28 27 0 1 0 0
Total 12,056 10029 829 63 81 554
Percentage 87.34 6094 0.54 0.74 4.64
Option 1
207 (Adding Blka 402, 409, 410)
309 216 45 1 12 35
New Totals 12,365 10,745 874 64 93 589
Percentage 86.94 7.14 0.54 0.74 484
l 1~ 5 r. {.i i; l fir. •r4wr r e
Y
1
POPULATION CHAN08 AS A RESULT OF ANNEXATIONS
i
DISTRICT 1
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
214 (Blk 113) 214 202 0' 0 4 8
DISTRICT 2
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
201 0 0 0 0 0 0
202 0 0 0 0 0 0
DISTRICT 3
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
204.01 (Blk 229) 68 58 0 0 0 10
DISTRICT 4
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
206 (Blk 306, 53 51 0 2 0 0
307, 309,
406, 410)
215,01 0 0 0 0 0 0
CITY OF DENTON'
POPULATION BY SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS
(Including annexations since 12/01/82)
B E,~PRICT 1
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
206.02 2,094 1,722 168 5 2 197
207 762 605 64 3 36 54
208 47 43 0 0 0 4
209 493 388 74 0 6 25
210 3,689 2,935 505 8 62 179
211 1,835 11456 186 11 15 167
212 2,578 558 1,990 5 1 24
213 433 374 25 4 0 30
214** 214 202 0 0 4 8
(Blk 113)
Total 129145 89283 3,012 36 126 6,38
Percentage 68.2% 24.8% 0.3% 1.0% 5.7%
DISTRICT 2
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
201** 0 0 0 0 0 0
202** 0 0 0 0 0 0
205.01 4,308 4,036 143 7 13 109
205.02 49994 4,808 85 21 24 56
206.01 865 822 4 5 8 26
206.02 19897 11724 97 3 31 42
Total 12,064 11,390 329 36 76 233
Percentage 94.4% 2.7% 0.3% 0.6% 2.0%
DISTRICT 3
Census
Tract Population White Black Indian Asian Other
204.01** 68 58 0 0 0 10
(Blk 229)
204.01 773 725 l8 1 1 28
204.02 2,944 21847 22 3 14 58
204603 3575 3,454 22 9 18 72
206,01 29598 2,030 361 9 67 131
207 2,122 11,756 149 5 86 126
Total 12,080 10,870 572 27 186 425
Percentage 90,0% 4.8% 0.2% 1.5% 3.5%
-
POPULATION BY SINGLE NEMBRR DISTRICTS
(INCLUDINO ANNEXATIONS SINCE 12/01/85)
PAGE 2
DISTRICT 4
Census
Traot Population White Black Indian Asian Other
203.01 3 3 0 0 0 0
203.02 27 27 0 0 0 0
208 1,663 10503 43 19 2 96
206** 53 51 0 2 0 0
(Blks 306,
307, 309
410)
209 2,803 10961 509 9 38 286
210 10669 19516 67 9 9 68
213 59588 59229 207 23 32 97
214 275 263 3 2 0 7
215.01** 0 0 0 0 0 0
217.01* 28 27 0 1 0 0
Total 120109 10,580 829 65 81 554
Percentage 87.4% 6.8% 0.5% 0.7% 4.6%
* Listed on ordinance as 217
Population increase due to annexation
I