HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-19-1985
C I Ty COUNCIL
AGENDA
03- l9- 85
14 i
i ~t s r Y'a' ,e'•~ -q _y z r:
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
• March 19, 1985
Tour of the new landfill site by the City of Denton City
Council on Tuesday, March 19, 1985, departing from the
Municipal Building parking lot at 4:00 p.m.
4:00 p.m.
1. Tour of the new landfill site.
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
March 19, 19859 at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
S:30 P.M.
1. Discussion of mass transit planning.
2. Consideration of proposed changes in the Federal
budget and pro pose! regulations affecting municipal
bonds.
3. Receive a report on cost estimates for sidewalks.
S 4. Executivo Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. -2(e), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
March 19, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. 1,n the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
11 Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of February 19, 1985 and the Special Called
Meeting of February 26, 1985.
21 Consent Agenda:
18ach of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thoreof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
tuthorixes the City Manager or his designee to
imp) em'aht each item- in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
ni y ~g y'' q 'h H +~t k n ~7v / [ a t n? J'i} 5 F. iC ~~fP f i
n B ~ S 'Cr rf ~ ro w.~Y d1 l•~ 1t
m
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 19, 1985
• Page Two
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda, Detailed
back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
4.A, and 4.B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ordinance.
1. Bid # 9394A - Pathological incinerator
2. Bid # 9398A - 30 cubic yard containers
3. Bid # 9411 - Police dictation system
4. Bid # 9413 - Office furniture
S. Bid # 9414 - Water treatment chemicals
6. Bid # 9415 - Office operating supplies
7. Bid # 9419 - Landfill fencing
Y 8. Bid # 9420 - Golf equipment and supplies
9. Bid # 9422 - Truck bed and bodies
10. Bid # 9423 - Line stringer
11. Hid # 9424 - 8 inch water meter
12. Bid # 9425 - Padmount switchgear
13. Bid # 9429 - Air paks
14. Bid # 9418 - Demolition and clearing of lots
1S. Bid # 9426 - Cleaning and painting of
ground level water storage
tanks
B. Plats, Replats and Site Plans:
1. Approval of preliminary plat of the
Creekside Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
. 2. Appproval of ppreliminary plat of the
Xelsoe 4itner Addition, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
ryw < F:9y r {sN Plt' 2, f aqy a " '~p ' P"~t^t .1 R.r!.i
K r
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 19, 1985
Page Three
3, Approval of preliminaryy and final replat of
the John A. Hann's Addition, Block 2, Lot
4-R1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
4. Approval of site plan revision of PD-22
(John Knox/Lake Forest Village Retirement
Center). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
C. Bid on Sale of City Property:
1, Bid ! 9417 Sale of City owned excess
right-of-way on Carroll
between Prairie and Highland
3. Public Hearings:
A. Hold a public hearing on the petition of tho City
of Denton for annexation of approximately 136.58
acres beginning appproximately SOO feet east of
the centerline of U.S. Highway 377 and south of
Brush Creek Road (A-11).
B. Hold a public hearing on the petition of the City
of Denton for annexation of approximately 65.12
acres beginning 3SO feet south of and
perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Highway
380 and east of. Ceesling Road (Capricorn Mobile
Home Park and surrounding property) (A-13).
C. Hold a public hearing on the petition of R. 0.
McDonnell for annexation of approximately 34.60
acres of land situated in the M, Forrest Survey,
Abstract No. 417, and beginning approximately ZSO
feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline
of FM 426 and approximately 2,000 feet east of
Mayhill Road (A-14).
D. Hold a public hearing on the petition of the City
of Denton for annexation of approximately 42.3S
acres of land situated in the S. Huitar Survey,
Abstract No, S14, and beginning approximately SOO
feet north of and perpendicular to the centerline
of U. S, Highway 380 and west of Masch Branch
. Road (A-1S).
B. Hold a public hearing on the petition of Hammett
4 Nash, Inc. and the City of Denton for
annexation of approximately ISO acres of land
located west of Playhill Road approximately 4,000
feet north of I-35 and adjacent and north of the
MK4T Railroad (A-17)0
}
! E r~ } hf yd#. ~f ,n, ak ~;.@ ~ YVI IS{}t,,~ en ~i q ~o as',4 i
%
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 19, 1985
Page Four
• F. Hold a public hearing on the petition of Redditch
Investments Corporation for annexation of
approximately 60.38 acres situated in the G.
Walker Survey, Abstract No, 1330, and beginning
adjacent and east of Edwards Road (A-18).
4. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing
for an effective date.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements;
providing for the expenditure of funds therefore;
and providipg for an effective date.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and American
. Appraisal Associates, Inc. for inventory and
appraisal services.
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the
establishment of light industrial (LI) zoning an
a 111.7 acre tract in the B, B. B. and C.R.R.
Company Survey, Abstract 141, and the R. Whitlock
Survey, Abstract 1403. The tract is located
north of Westgate Hospital and Medical Center,
approximately 600 feet west of the Interstate
Highway 3S north service road and adjacent and
east of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Railroad (Z-1712). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD)
district for light industrial (LI) uses on an
approximately 94.3 acre tract in the Gideon
Walker Survey, Abstract 1330. The pro pparty is
located on the east side of Mayhiil Road
approximately 1600 feet south of F14 426 (East
McKinney Street) and is more particularly
described as Tracts 1F9 IF1, 1C, 1A and 1E of the
Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330 (Z-1717).
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
A c~ Y 11'°',T! P N ~7 . le .p.
et ^h i`fiP P:.n r V s ^ l 4( f Y 'i0 1.P C j,
r
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 19, 1985
Page Five
• F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
district with a specific use permit for a mobile
home park to the general retail (GR) zoning
district on a 2.9 acre tract situated in the
Stephen Hembrie Survey, Abstract 643. The
property is located at the northeast corner of
Robinson Road and FM 2181 (Teasley Lane)
(Z-1720). (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the single family (SF-7)
district to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 4.4 acre tract situated in
the Alexander Hill Survey, Abstract 623. The
F roperty is located at 1'213 Bernard Street
Z-1721). (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning fr-)m the single family (SF-10)
district to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 19.8 acre tract in the R.
• Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31. The property is
located on the east side of Hinkle Drive
approximately 800 feet north of University Drive
(U. S. Highway 380) (Z-1724). (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
11 Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
expenditure of funds by the City of Denton, Texas
for the purchase of real propert• situated in the
B.B.B. 8 C.R.R. Co. Survey, A~strict No. 1850
City and County of Denton, Texas, being 'all of
lots 11, 12 and 139 Block 2 of the Oatman
Addition to the City of Denton, accepting a
warranty deed therefore from Infinity Energy,
Inc., and declaring an effective date.
J. Consider adoption of a ordinance approving an
agreement providing for the sale of eloctric
power by the cities of Denton, Bryan, Garland and
Greenville and Brazos Electric Power Cooperative,
Inc. (referred to as "TMPP") to Texas Utilities
Electric Company (referred to as 19TUEC11) and
authorizing the Mayor to execute the.agreement.
(The Public Utilities koard recommends approval.)
•
f,
~ ~43 ~r ~ 41
y ~ 1 ♦ 'r:r~ 1 Xi 1 •y .,a n 4b }
•~.~1 v,
1
ac
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Harth 19, 1985
rage six
5' Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution by the City
Council of the City of Denton, Texas, relating to
the approval of the issuance of certain refunding
bonds by the North Texas Higher Education
Authority, Inc.; approving the issuance of such
bonds and making certain findings in connection
therewith.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
inclusion of the City of Denton, Texas, within
the "Eligible Loan Area" in connection with
Denton County Hous•.ng -Finxince Corporation Single
Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1985.
C. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
closing of a portion of Fry Street between Oak
and Hickory streets from 8:00 a.m. until 7:00
p.m. on Saturday, April 20, 1985 for the Sigma
Alpha My Fraternity annual Spring Rennaissance,
6. Consider request for funding from Flow Memorial
Hospital Board of Directors.
• 7. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
8. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin boazd at the City
Hal of the City of De ton, Texas,
oa. m. }e r/`- day of 1995 at o'clock
1
WTI -bjbj(;JKkiTXkT 4j
1687C
F
O •~'f .1. nS • ry a .r
l
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
March 19, 1985
'four of the new landfill site by the City of Denton City
Council on Tuesday, March 19, 1985, departing from the
Municipal Building parking lot at 4:00 p.m.
4:00 p.m.
1. Tour of the new landfill site.
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
March 19, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
1. Discussion of mass transit planning.
2. Consideration of proposed changes in the Federal
budget and proposed regulations affecting municipal
bonds.
3. Receive a report on cost estimates for sidewalks.
4. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252.17 V. A, T. S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
March 19, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of February 19, 1985 and the Special Called
Meeting of February 26, 1985.
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 19, 1985
Page Two
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-lip information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
4.A, and 4.B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ordinance.
1. Bid R 9394A - Pathological incinerator
2. Bid 0 9398A - 30 cubic yard containers
3. Bid # 9411 - Police dictation system
4. Bid 1 9413 - Office furniture
S. Bid # 9414 - Water treatment chemicals
6. Bid # 941S - Uffice operating supplies
7. Bid 1 9419 - Landfill fencing
8. Bid 1 9420 - Golf equipment and supplies
9. Bid Y 9422 Truck bed and bodies
10. Bid 0 9423 - Line stringer
11. Bid 0 9424 - 8 inch water meter
U. Bid # 9425 - Padmount switchgear
13. Bid # 9429 - Air paks
14. Bid 1 9418 - Demolition and clearing of lots
15. Bid Y 9426 - Cleaning and painting of
ground level water storage
tanks
B. Plats, Replats and Site Plans:
1. Approval of preliminary plat of the
Creekside Addition, Block 1, Lot 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
Z. Approval of preliminary plat of the
Kelsoe-Pitner Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
rc4 i1 f. s. Na rye, 4 ?.-0'.w.. Jr r I, v L....;.i ~f, ~ f." r y! rw4
a "L y 1 r ,"1 . I 4 a
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 19, 198S
Page Three
3. Approval of preliminary and final re plat of
the John A. Hann's Addition, Block 2, Lot
4-R1. (The Planning. and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
4. Approval of site plan revision of PD-22
(.John Knox/Lake Forest Village Retirement
Center). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
C. Bid on Sale of City Property:
1. Bid i 9417 Salo of City owned excess
right-of-way on Carroll
between Prairie and Highland
3. Public Hearings:
A. Hold a public hearing on the petition of the City
of Denton for annexation of approximately 136.S8
acres beginning appproximately F00 feet east of
the centerline of U.S. Highway 377 and south of
Brush Creek Road (A-11).
B. Hold a public hearing on the petition of the City
of Denton for annexation of approximately 65.11
acres beginning 350 feet south of and
perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Highway
380 and east of Geesling Road (Capricorn Mobile
Home Park and surrounding property) (A-13).
C. Hold a public hearing on the petition of R. 0.
McDonnell for annexation of approximately 34.60
acres of land situated in the M. Forrest Survey,
Abstract No. 417, and beginning approximately 250
feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline
of FM 426 and approximately 2,000 feet east of
Mayhill Road (A-14).
D. Hold a public hearing on the petition of the City
of Denton for annexation of approximately 42.35
acres of land situated in the S, Huizar Survey,
Abstract No. 514, and beginning approximately S00
feet north of and perpendicular to the centerline
of U. S. Highway 380 and west of March Branch
Road (A-1S).
B. Hold a public hearing on the petition of Hammett
$ Nash, inc. and the City of Denton for
annexation of approximately ISO acres of land
located west of Mayhill Road approximately 4,000
feet north of 1-35 and adjacent and north of the
MK$T Railroad (P.-17).
,"ar ! r n,' a`,
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 19, 1985
Page Four
F. Hold a public hearing on tho petition of Redditch
Investments Corporation for annexation of
approximately 60.38 acres situated in the G.
Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and beginning
adjacent and east of Edwards Road (A-i8).
4. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing
for an effective date.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements;
providing for the expenditure of funds therefore;
and providing for an effective date.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and American
Appraisal Associates, Inc. for inventory and
appraisal services.
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the
establishment of light industrial (LI) zoning on
a 111.7 acre trace in the B.B.B. and C.R.R.
Company Survey, Abstract 141, and the R. Whitlock
Survey, Abstract 140. The tract is located
north of Westgate Hospital and Medical Center,
approximately 600 f3et west of the Interstate
Highway 35 north service road and adjacent and
east of the Atchison, TopA a and Santa Fe
Railroad (Z-1711). (The Planning and Zoning
Conmission recommends approval.)
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD)
district for light industrial (LI) uses on an
approximately 94.3 acre tract in the Gideon
Walker Survey, Abstract 1330. The propperty is
located on the east side of Mayhill Road
approximately 1600 feet south of F14 416 (East
McKinney Street) and is more particularly
described as Tracts iF, 01, 1C, IA and IE of the
Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330 (Z-1717),
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 19, 1985
Page Five
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
district with a specific use permit for a mobile
home park to the general retail (GR) zoning
district on a 2.9 acre tract situated in the
Stephen Hembrie Survey, Abstract 643. The
property is located at the northeast corner of
Robinson Road and FM 2181 (Teasley Lane)
(1-1720). (rhe Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the single family (SF-7)
district to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 4.4 acre tract situated in
the Alexander Mill Survey, Abstract 623. The
M ropert}' is located at 1213 Bernard Street
Z-1721). (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the single family (SF-10)
district to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 19.8 acre tract in the R.
Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31. The property is
located on the east side of Hinkle Drive
approximately 800 feet north of University Drive
(U. 5. Highway 380) (Z-1724). (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
expenditure of funds by the City of Denton, Texas
for the purchase of real property situated in the
B.B.B. & C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 185,
City and County of Denton, Texas, being all of
lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 2 of the Oatman
Airiition to the City of Denton, accepting a
warranty deed therefore from Infinity Energy,
inc., and declaring an effective date.
J. Consider adoption of a ordinance approving an
agreement providing for the sale of electric
power by the cities of Denton, Bryan, Garland and
Greenville and Brazos Electric Power Cooperative,
Inc. (referred to as "TMPP") to Texas Utilities
Electric Company (referred to as "TUEC") and
authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement.
(The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
K i.ylr »r4P r!a n a ~r - r w a 'N
s ",a rfi •aV ~~r .R5 Y. lr r"..`. Yf!:''`r. r r I,i rain r'.i ri L
yr
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Mar.h 19, 1985
Page Six
5. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution by the City
Council of the City of Denton, Texas, relating to
the approval of the issuance of certain refunding
bonds by the North Texas Higher Education
Authority, Inc.; approving the issuance of such
bonds and making certain findings in connection
therewith.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
inclusion of the City of Denton, Texas, within
the "Eligible Loan Areal' in connection with
Denton County Housing Finance Corporation Single
Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1985.
C. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
closing of a portion of Fry Street between Oak
and Hickory streets from 8:00 a.m. until 7:00
p.m, on Saturday, April 20, 1985 for the Sigma
Alpha My Fraternity annual Spring Rennaissance.
6. Consider request for funding from Flow Memorial
Hospital Board of Directors.
7. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
8, New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C E R T I F 1 C A T E
1 certify that the above notice of meeting war posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1985 at o` clock
(a. m. ) p. m.
1687C
;bb Y,~(( '~'~~~A '„w✓~'~~.~ti r ,.rn 5~ hP r Yu r y },y~`.r ~J i r4ei a
~1 A V tl Y W by 4 [L
DATE: Oil l 165
CITY COUNCIL REPORT MATT
e
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: MASS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
R4COMMENDATION:
None
SUMMARY:
This is a summary of activities carried out by the Planning and
Community Development Department regarding mass transportation
planning.
BACKGROUND:
This to the response to Councilman Hopkin's request.
PROGRAMS, DOPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Citywide
ISC L IMPACT:
None at this time.
V~Aubmi e
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Jeff MeyaZACN3
Director of Planning
and Community Development
10168
WY: f DENTON, TEX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 13, 1985
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning
and Community Development
SUBJECT: MASS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Although formal policy regarding mass transportation planning
in the City of Denton is restricted to those policies in the
Denton Development Guidel, mass transportation planning is an
on-going activity in the Planning and Community Development
Department. In addition to calculating trip generation for
each zoning case, staff also analyzes the probable impact of
projected mass transportation routes and loading areas retarding
proposed zoning. Because these potential locations seem o be
quite stable projections can be made with a large degree of
certainty and accuracy.
Adding some technical assistance to the transportation planning
process is the Denton Transit Feasibility Study, published by
the Regional Planning Office of the State De artment of Highways
and Public Transportation in lugust, 19820 Excerpts of that
study are offered as examples .
The City is, of course, involved in mass transit through its
financial assistance and monitoring of the SPAN and Nandi-Hop
programs. These programs provide transportation services to
the elderly and the handicapped within the city limits.
1 See Attachment A
2 See Attachment B
t !a , Y, r a i"
t' t a,~^a ,~:i Lit
City Council
starch 13, 1985
Page 2
The League of Women Voters have been very active in studyying
the mass transportation needs in Denton. The staff of ttie
Planning and Community Development Department has worked with
this group, providing background information as requested.
Staff membership on the North Central Texas Council of Gov-
ernments (NCTCOG) Regional Air quality Task Force is also
concerned with mass transportation. The transportation cycle,
from refinery to vehicle exhaust, is still the major cause of
air pollution in this area. Although the vast majority of air
pollution measured in Denton County is caused by Dallas and
Tarrant Counties, abatement measures including mass transpor-
tation options do affect Denton. Attachment C identifies the
impact problem.
The air quality issue is indicative of the regional nature of
studying mass transportation for Denton. For example, even
if Denton wished to link with the mass transit systems in the
metroplex, it would be difficult to do so without the partici-
pation of the communities separating Denton from the large
urban transportation systems. Complicatip the issue even more
is the changing mood o the mobile public
costs of operating private vehicles.
The City Council addressed the issue of mass transportation at
the 1984 Tanglewood Retreat. Goals were defined4, but not
formally adopted. It is expected that these goals will be part
of the Council's strategic planning process.
Like so many other things, action follows demand. If the
public demand and accompanying willingness to pay are suf-
ficient, it is conceivable that the planning and subsequent
implementation processes will be accelerated.
In the meantime, staff will continue to monitor and evaluate
the ation l whand local en requested, and transportation n look situation,
to i the City C il
inform
for further direction.
3 See Attachment D
4 See Attachment g
e
jg
Attachments
0735]
$ ,.V v~ ,t R:4ri r~~ c~i n "_i / •et v t 't. ~"x i i ~'a° ~~«Y✓ r lS {.~7 7 ,+ii w V~"~F-
ATTACHMENT
A
DENTON DEVELOPMENT
GUIDE POLICIES
5 Se° ~t k N ti r~ .i' Mr n n r . , YY ^'~i r f r Sy f ,~/FFv ! lv r.
r Y
1
6. MASS TRANSrr
This Men by Policy recognite= On tncreastrely important need for mass
transit. Any large concentrations of development will, at some time,
reegdre mass transit if the land use b=sportatton balance is to be
maintained However, our problem is not totally long range. Today our
energy problems become more critical by the day. Therefore, the overall
policy of this guide is to start today on localized mass transit and to lay a
long range plan for inter-regional mass transit networks for the future.
The graphic concept plan for this is presented in the map on the following
pa"I
PACE 41
l }}1 ETY J } Jk 1 1 , W w !~J 7 + It S:, ! Y W Y Ft. rA e. Fin 'h4 Fv'li
4`t y ! ,f l~ Y r~ ~f ~ 1 d
%
I 1.1 1 is • III l
poll
• t ♦ •
II rlu 1
/
J-D
_
6 )101
1 V •
~1 •
r 1~' 1
abbeft
644 6
Plate 7 MASS TRANSIT CONCEPT PLAN
TRANSIT L4NS
r i - O Maly Local Stops .,,u~rr■ Regional Mass Transit Line
• Regional Transit Stops Me park and ride I ri o I I + m Local Mass Transit Lint
PADS 48 ...r_r
1 rrr rrrnJ
ATTACHMENT
B.
DENTON TRANSIT
FEASIBILITY STUDY
4' r
~ 1 ° 9 S' ~ r~ 'jy '•~E ~ ~ e r ^A _ ^W E u'~l ~ "'J' T4:
• ~ j', •ka ,~r , ~ ' n i I ~ ~ T 7
nenten ' msIt
Feasibility Study
~rX i~ v7 = °'i L x d4ti 4 ' ty fll' ! ~'h ~.V k 4 !d r n" ro~u~ f~_`--'r-ti
ii y`} a ~ti to a: fn•:
S
DENTON TRANSIT
FEASIBILITY STUDY
REGIONAL PLANNING OFFICE
STATE DEPARTMENT Of HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
AUGUST 1987
.;5
Fi t... Jr 1 13Y'r P Yf °I Ya•Ky F[ffYi Mti t ~t9. e' .Y. 3
~ h V r T aR A A n
Trip Generators
Two groups of people have been identified as prime transit riders.
They are tho transit dependent and commuters. The transit dependent
are those who are either too young or old to drive themselves or are
those houstSolds which own one or fewer autos and must find other means
of transportation when an auto is not available!
Several locations in Denton have been identified as possible trans-
It trip generators. These are: Downtown Denton, Flow Memorial Hospi-
tal, Westgate Hospital, Denton Osteopathic Hospital, North Texas State
University, Texas Woman's University, Denton Center Shopping AreL and
the Golden Triangle !tail.
Downtown Denton is that area around the Courthouse Square. This
area has been experiencing a revival within the past several years with
new shops and restaurants renovating old buildings. Within a three
block radius of the Courthouse are most of the county, federal and city
offices for Denton.
The three hospitals in Denton create numerous trips per day, The
results of the mall-back survey show that fifteen percent of those re-
sponding listed one of the hospitals as their destination.
North Texas State University had an enrollment in excess of 17,000
In 1980 and Texas Women's University had nearly 8,000 students. Their
faculties and staffs make these two institutions the largest employers
in Denton. Many of the persons going to 14TSU and TWU either are transit
10
0.K i5:: t7 w; a t yr i +-`d x' J~' s h tis t
s S'
dependent or have a highly structured work trip, both of which can be
easily served by public transit. Indeed, moving people to and from
the schools has become such a problem that they have contracted with
a private bus company to provide shuttle service for their students.
The Denton Center Shopping Area and the Golden Triangle Mall
are the major non-downtown commercial areas for Denton. As such, they
create numerous person-trips daily. A portion of those trips could be
served by transit. The survey results show that more than one-third of
those responding would use transit.
I
I
I
qn,
`4
Both fixed route-fixed schedule (FR-FS) anti demand responsive
transit (DRT) have advantages as well as disadvantages. From a
scheduling standpoint, the FR-FS system would have regular schedules
and routes which build confidence in the customer's vie,-pnint. URT
has a highly flexible route .nd 40hedule v+A ch provides customers an
extra service. On .-A-FS systems transfer between routes are sometimes
needed to complete trips. On DIRT systems no transfers are needed.
Seating on DRT is almost guaranteed while on FR-FS systems there are
some standees at times. The equipment used by an FR-F~ system can
be of any size while ORT needs smaller vehicles In order to nenotiate
residential streets. On an FR-FS system, operating expenses can be
accurately estimated because route mileage, vehicle hours and opera-
tor hours are fixed. On DRT systems these Items are more variable.
The fares on DRT systems are traditionally higher, partly because they
provide a high degree of service. FR-FS fares are lower. Two reasons
for thisare operating expenses can be more accurately estimated and
they offer fewer service amenities, such as house-to-house service.
In conclusion, either transit type will provide transportation
for the citizens of Denton and the decision on which should be used
is up to the city council and staff.
16
MAP+y ,Li { a3 Sa3 } '
Service Areas
Several possible areas for transit service have been studied.
These-include residential, commercial and both university areas,
Areas studied are shown on 'r'igure 3•
Area 1:
This Is the Courthouse Square/Downtown area where a concentra-
tion of commercial businesses and government employees make
transit a desirable quantity.
Area 2:.
This area is characterized by both industrial development and
lower income areas. Both prime transit marketing groups.
Area 3:
This Is an area of middle to upper Income level homes and the
Golden Triangle Shopping Mali. The mobility of the residents
of this area does not contribute to high transit ridership.
The shopping mall Is a good transit target because of the large
number of trips to a single location.
Area 4:
This area contains both single family homes and apartment units
south of the North Texas State University campus. This area
could provide transit passengers If scheduling and routinq Is
properly arranged,
Area 5:
This area runs along the Oak/liickory Street couplet which does
commercial strip development serving the NTSU campus. There is
also a concentration of apartments which can be serviced by
transit.
Area 6:
This area of single family homes also contains the high school
and a hospital/medical area. Both of these traffic generators
could be served well by transit.
Area 7:
This area contains mostly middle-class homes but there are also
two nurslny homes within the area which could use transit.
17
11,5 ~Iq)111 VA, ~c, .x 771
Area
This Is an area of mostly middle Intone homes. The mobility of
the residents of this area identifies It as a traditionally low
transit ridership area.
Area 9:
This is also an area of mostly middle Income homes. The mobil -
ity of the residents of this area again Identifies it as a tra-
ditionally low transit ridership area.
Area 10:
This area Is Texas Women's University. This traffic generator
has good potential for transit to serve the coileae students.
I
18
. . .tA -,e,•. '_.f i.~ i r+' .STN. ~ rt-
P, t
qoft
f Merl' ~ ~ 1~~ ~ ? ~
Ile%
T q . ,
Ile
-L E G E N 0
Service Area ;
S ca It: I" s Imlle !
_
o SERVICE AREAS
FIGURE 3
wr
7 7
-
t k.
Summary and Conclusions
The City of Denton is a vibrant and growing city, and is projected
to enjoy continued growth. Several areas and groups have been Identi-
fied as potentially transit dependent. The City currently has no tran-
sit system serving the general population, although several specialized
groups do receive transportation from the current transportation pro-
viders. A survey has shown that the public desires to have a public
bus system and would probably use it most for shopping, medical and
work trips.
This study has identified several areas arqund the City that
could support transit. It also described a possible organization to
support a system. The study outlined two possible types of transit
systems for Denton. It then estimated ridership, revenues, expendi-
tures and capital costs. A short report on various funding sources
was also included. Table 2 summarizes the various systems and options
and shows federal, state and local contributions for both operating
deficit and capital costs.
The percentages used to determine federal, state and local contri-
butions are subject to change by both the Urban Mass Transportation
Administration and the State Department of Highways and Public Trans-
portation. There has been discussion whereby local governments would
be expected to be "weaned" of federal assistance within the coming years.
This study is presented so that the City Council and staff may
make an economic decision as to whether the City sho-ild proceed with
planning a public transit system in light of both the current uncer-
talnty of continued federal support and their own assessment of the
public's attitude toward increased public expenditures.
29
'fir S.SnL y 'l 4q F
q ~ :'y r 1
After that decision Is reached, the SDHPT will, if needed, proceed
with a more detailed analysis of the service areas, routes and sched-
uling for a Denton transit system. The ridership estimates, expendi-
ture and capital costs will be further refined. A report on the pro-
posed system will then be issued to the City.
I
30
w' r: nW 1F, .r ar• rwn a .r,..;; ,c,sru. a '
r~ r
I
ATTACHMENT
C
AIR gUALITY
MEASUREMENTS
7717,
rM 1.2 I'F "'s-vim. ~!T5 . 1: r y :.i .:T;,2 t
NUMPFR OF DAPS WITH HOURLY OZONE VALUE'S
GREATER THAN 0.12 PPM
MONITOR SITE 80 81 82 83
DENTON COUNTY
451420054HOl 9 2 16
DALLAS, SUNNYVALE
451320047HOl 0 1
DALLAS, ILLINOIS
451310052HOl 0 2 1 4
DALLAS, MOCKINGBIRD
451310044HOI 2 6 8 7
DALLAS► BONNIEVIEW
451310055HOI 1 3
DALLAS NORTH, (05)
451310645FOl 10 4 11 7
FORT WORTH, NW, (13)
451880001FOl 4 4 5 1
FORT WORTH► DTN, (16)
451880003FOI 1 0
11- TARRANT, HASLET
455070002FOl 2 0
TARRANT COUNTY, KELLER
455070003FOl 0 5
ARLINGTON
450170005FOl 3 0
_3_
7777777,
4 A"
OZONE EXCEEDANCES
HIGH HIGH NO. OF WIND WIND
MONITOR SITE YEAR DATE PPM HOUR HOURS SPEED DIREC.
DENTON COUNTY 1981 JUL 10 0.13 1400 2 3 SW
Hwy 121 AUG 10 0.14 1300 1 3 S
451420054HOl AUG 11 0.13 1400 1 0 N
AUG 13 0.14 1700 1 6 N
AUG 24 0.14 1500 2 6 SE
SEP 11 0.15 1500 3 5 SE
SEP 12 0.13 1500 1 4 S
SEP 24 0.13 1100 3 9 SE
SEP 25 0.13 0100 1 2 S
1982 JUL 13 0.16 1400 3 1 SE
JUL 21 0.13 1500 1 1 E
1983 MAY 25 0.13 1500 1 1 S
MAY 26 0.13 1600 2 1 SE
JUN 8 0.15 1500 3 1 NE
JUN 16 0.13 1500 1 1 S
JUL 11 0.13 1300 1 4 S
JUL 21 0,14 1400 3 5 SE
JUL 22 0.13 1200 2 4 SE
JUL 30 0.13 1300 1 2 S
AUG 5 0.13 1300 1 3 SE
AUG 13 0.14 1600 1 3 SE
AUG 15 0.14 1500 1 4 SE
AUG 25 0.16 1300 3 2 SE
AUG 26 0.15 1600 3 3 S
AUG 27 0413 1700 1 4 W f.
AUG 30 0.13 1600 3 2 SW
SEP 3 0,13 1300 1 4 S
.7-
NUMBER OF WORK TRIPS ENTERING CITIES OF DALLAS AND FORT WORTH
z
YAt+ of NIB NOIIM.~AMALNIIW ,
r
wwo Dow cam
1,771 169548 21 0165 Hurd
(17.6x) (25.4x) (34.5x) 0
Hook 2, 251
w 35.4x)
PAIo Pinto Parker Taaam Ddo
0 5,284
(30.6x) KMIIIgt11
3j347
1j062 76708 51889 (24.2x)
Johmm Eft
(16.4x)
Erath
somwom
0 0
Nwom
0
P
rt ..a tr R• 4'7 y'
s. N Y• ,of /f '14: a ' Y' i..f (st [ ] Lr .
X4 SX 4u-i'-q r,•~'. ~ r^,~ 'r.~^^r_e rr-~•d-n. y:'.1;S r A'S ! rti -r i ye,',
r r .s
NuWwr Working Percent Working
in Central City in Central City
Collin 216165 34.5
Denton 169548 25.4
Ellis 5.894 23.0
Erath 0 0.0
Hood t 1,062 16.4
Hunt 0. 0.0
Johns h 1,i0A 28.4
KaufsN a ` r 3347 24.2
Nawrro' d 0 ; 0 0
Palo Pinto 0
0 0 :x
Parker So,-284 3016
Rockwall 2251
~ x= 35,E
So~ervell 0 0,0
Wise 1 111 11.6
a r
Ia .r
j,
Tine !t
i~h~~ JH ids d]FWT
•yi., Y
a..,,'r r.FJ'MUr ra:..,r"h ,evey
a
x 1r } a' r t ri `~;h rl r s t yrE~. a yt~~'J h;r 1.• t
Y a .i 4 sL
P e ° '.1 1 ~t .~tj}}wi r
'
a
PERIMETER COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACT
ON DALLAS AND TARRANT COUNTIES
(l"O)
Perimeter DALLAS COUNTY TARRANT COUNTY
Count Daily VNT in Percent of Daily VXT in Percent of
(From Dallas County County Total ( Tarrant County County Travel
Collin 295569000 7.0
Dallas I 194601000 ( 7.4
Denton 2,286,000 ( 6.3 j 297,000 j 1,5
Ellis 1,345,060 ( 3.7 ( 1010000 ( 0.5
Mood * ( • j 1181000 ( 0.6
Johnson 1720000 j 0.5 1,303,000 ( 6.6
Kaufman 796,000 j 2.2
Parker * ( * ( 1,0780000 ( 5.5
Rockwall 4822000 ( 1.3
Tarrant 515069000 ( 15.1 j
41se * ( * ( 2A10000 1.4
1302711000 36.5 416389000 23.5
Total County
YNT 36,400,000 ( 19,60C,00 j
* less than 0,611 of total Dallas or Tarraot County travel.
1
w
,.t
PERIMETER COUTY TRAVEL IMPACT
ON
OALLAS ANOJARRANT COVNTISS
I
Transportation and Energy Department
North Central Texas Council of Governments
August 1984
'
.r~Y67.t tlnra:+ rb~,~r is tEfif' bar.". 9t tC." ^to1 ;251
i
INTERACTION Of PERIMETER COUNTY TRAVEL ,
ON DALLAS MO TARRANT COUNTIES
Mhw Dr.w
IMnl
i3 t~
~s
LI
wa ~
Pao flow Pe" 1~wa1 Oar
u ~
N
L1 riwhri
Moor Li 33
J.Irwow a' s
.
E~+in
So~erwll
Home
Values represent the percent of travel by perimeter county
residents in Dallis and Tarrant Counties,
~ . ~rrrnr
S ;l V1}i r ,r. v t 1 M,' J s, v YF S S 1}~¢rii,
ATTACHMENT
D
CHANGING
PATTERNS
•
Cr poo ing grows more popular
while M- ass transit use . dechnes
By PETER FRANCESE The work force is getting older
PEOPLE PATTMS and more of it is professional or
Not all Americans get to work white collar. Office complexes can
by driving alone in their cars, but the Consumer Expen&ture Sur- be anywhere and often are far
that method still is way ahead of yey, the average Amnion house- enough from shopping areas that
what's in second place. hold spends more than $3,000 a not having a car at work is incon.
Nearly two-thirds of all em. year to own and operate its auto. venlent. Also, halt of all mothers
*Yed people (64 percent) drive wr-4 s but oNy X15 a year on with Presihool children are in the
al work public traroportation, labor force, and most of them
alone. Con- More than S million need a wa
sidering the tie Y to go to the daycare
very strong r-rPersona walk to work, about equal to the center as well as to wollL
desire that number' who take the bus or train. However, there ate large office
most people A tiny 2 pemnt of. all employed complexes in places such as Oak-
have a be f work only at home, &M, brook, IIL, and Stamford, Conn.,
alone once in the final 2 percent take taxis, ride that employ enough pr,.pie who
awhile, only d. ' a bicycle or motorcycle or use are neighbors In other suburban
another somk otheir means. towns to make car or van pooling
sharp rise in Given the high cost of owro attractive. Chrysler's minivans, for
g a s o l i n e 3 and open a owning example, have been selling as fast `
can more peo- as they can be made and should !
prices will + ale be cajoled out of their can into continue to sell very well as long
change the Mass transit. I doubt it. Two as this, trend toward dispersed
habits of 63 million solitary trends are working against public white-collar employment
commuters poration, and for cars and car continues.
pooling or van pooling - The second place choice - car Pooling A there growing L'd is used b about 2o ✓ bo the big Ntir! : e losing In9of
the baby boomers Into the
by out 20 populolation and jobs v, suburban age 8P• (33 to ~4 and 45 to St)
Percent or 11d mdlllon worker. and rural areas. The commuting that own the most can and have
halt 1970, when
and cars cost leas patterns are shifting from be, the most famgy member em.
thaBKk
tically gave as much away Y prat- tween suburb and city between ployed. People who own can are
percent of comuters reported I I suburb and other suburbs (t rural the most likely to drive them to
[carted and suburb. For example, in the work. Not only will this make the
driv
ing with somebody bleb. Washington, D.C., metro area, autornaken happy, but it also wW
Public
streetcar or subway - bus. more than twice as many subut- bring a smile to the faces of peo-
slated c~ Only 8 is a distant ban worker commute to another ple who manufacture acoessories
Y percent of suburb as go into D.C. to work, like car stereos, tape decks and
w
and orkers get to work that way, ✓ Second, the shifting ag.n other things that make the trips to
stighUy dr1970 has declined structure and occupational trends and from won * more pleasant.
ccording to will tend to favor cars and vans. • IOU ,r,,Wi.N ov„oo,,,mkr
•
r
r .
ATTACHMENT
E
TRANSPORTATION
GOALS
.{9~.., 1};~ 1 , y d Y } k +4.•S F :r 'I J tf T,
TRANSPORTATION GOALS
1. Establish a bus route to connect TWU, XTSU, the square, and major
shopping centers by (insert date) .
2. Develop a bus system to connect najor residential and commercial
areas by (insert date) .
3. Develop connections with Dallas/Fort Worth (DART - CITRAN) systems
and to the Dallas/Fort North Regional Airport by (insert date) .
4. Continue to develop any support the SPAN and Hands Hop Systems.
(Note: Nore specific goals are needed).
5. Expand the taxi systems by (insert date) (Note: Requires more
detail .
6. Develop a master transportation plan by (insert date) .
7. Establish a Park and Ride service to Dallas and the DFN Airport by
(insert date) .
8. Contract with SPAS for transportation services for the disabled
without regard to age by (insert date) .
01/16/86
a .w ~
i
DATE: March 19, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORM
,D
Mayor and Members of the City Council e
T0:
FROM G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
DATE: March 14, 1985 v v
SUBJECT: Proposed Changes to Federal Grants for Cities and
Federal Tax Law
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should adopt a position regarding the proposed
changes to the programs of Federal Assistance to Cities and
regarding the proposed changes concerning municipal bonds.
SUMMARY:
As part of the President's proposed program to cut the Federal
b:tdget, Federal aid to local governments will be significantly
reduced. Many of these programs have provided assistance to the
City of Denton. In addition, as part of this program and as part of
an on-going review by the Treasury Department of Federal tax
regulations, several changes have been proposed in the treatment of
tax exempt municipal bonds.
BACKGROUND:
The proposed changes would significantly reduce Federal aid to the
City of Denton and thereby cause the City Council to eliminate the
effected programs cr develop alternate funding sources. The
proposed changes to regulations affecting tax exempt municipal bonds
would severely restrict the use of these bonds to finance needed
rppublic facilities, such as water and sower lines and electric
.aci l itiea.
PROGRAMS, DEPARYPIENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Virtually all city departments would be affected in some way if the
proposed budget cuts snd changes in regulations are approved.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sue summary attached.
Respeq~f su t d:
G. Chris
Cit; Mnager
Prepared by:
•
r
ame - Title
Appr4d
• 94:~o
aNme~ Title
a
OPEN GRANTS AS OF
MARCH 139 1985
STATE/
GRANT FEDERAL AUENCY AMOUNT
Revenue Sharing Federal Department of Treasury 35299121
Office of Revenue Sharing
Recreation Services State Texas Rehabilitation 870230
and Training Model Commission
Juvenile Law State Office of the Governor 27,791
Enforcement Officer Criminal Justice Division
Pro,3ect
Crime Prevention State Office of the Governor 13,407
Unit/4 Criminal Justice Division
Community Development Federal Department of Housing and 614,000
Block Grant Urban Development
Airport Development Federal U. S. Department of 468,500
Grant Transportation Federal
Aviation Administration
1398F
n ! a T.' ~ 5 7 t~' ~ ,H a'rl F 3^.y ri a'Cli k5 iii t"B.J
y
PLEASE MAIL THIS QUESTIONNAIRE NO WATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS*
ONDAYi FEBRUARY 25j 1985 TO THE U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
Do you wish the information in this
questionnaire held confidential?
X Yes No CITY Denton, Texas
THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED FY86 BUDGET ON CITIES
11 General Revenue Sharing
a) The Administration's budget proposes to eliminate General
Revenue Sharing in FY86. what percentage of your city's
tota' revenues including all intergovernmental grants is
accounted for by the revenue sharing program? ;_pg
b) If revenue sharing is eliminated, what is your city's
likely course of action? Check the appropriate items
below.
Cuts in Services
X .Public safety (police and fire)
-Human services
Sanitation
--Capital improvements
Health services
`Other (explain)
'None
Tax Increases
X Properky taxes
Income taxes
X User fees
-Sales taxes
Other tax hikes (explain) _
Other Actions (explain)
c) Do you expect your state government will make up for any
of the cut in revenue sharing funds? Yes XNo
if yea, what percentage? 8
2. Community Development Block Grant
a) The Administration's FY86 budget proposes a 10 percent cut
in CDBG and a change in the entitlement cities/small
cities ratio from 70/30 to 60/40. This translates into a
proposed 23 percent cut for entitlement cities and a
• possible 10 percent cut for small cities. What will be
the effect of this cut on community development in your
city?
None X Adverse ..Very Adverse
PAGE" Z CITY Denton, Texas
Ex plain Request for usage far exceeds amount available. This cut
i would not be able to be supplanted wi local-MM.
L) Show the percentage of your CDBG that goes into each of
the following areas.
Economic Development 0
Housing Assistance "'Zi:S'
social services 0.51
Public works/in ras ruc ure~~~ _~~~gg~~p%
OtherAdmirtistrz2ion/Acguisition ~NI
c) which of the areas listed above would most likely be cut
in your city as a result of the federal cut? Uncertain at
this time.
3. Urban Development Action Grants
a) The federal budget proposes to eliminate UDAGs beginning
in FY86. What would be the effect of the elimination of
the program in your city?
_None X Adverse Very Adverse
Explain Would intend to utilize in economic development program
for core areas. Have anticipated oing sS.
• b) How many projects eligible for UDAG funding is your city
now applying for or planning to apply for? 0
c) How many dollars in the following categories do these
projects involve? N/4
UDAG $
other -public
Private $
d) How many jobs would these projects create in your city?
Undeterminable.
e) How many of these projects do you expect to go ahead
without UDAG funding? 0
4. Public Transit
The proposed FY96 budget calls for a two-thirds reduction in
transit assistance, which would include a tots elimination
of federal operating assistance and a rise in the local -
match ng share from 2 to 30 percent. The combined effect of
this proposal would mean a loss of most of the federal
capital assistance as well as all of the transit operating
assistance to your urban area. If this budget were
approved:
•
a
PAGE 3 CITY
• a) Would the fares charged by your transit system increase?
Yes XNo If yes, by what percent?
b) Would there be a reduction in the number of transit
vehicles in service? Yes -.1-No
c) Would there be a reduction in routes? lYes _X_No
d) overall, what percentage of transit service would be
reduced? 2 % reduction of service
e) Would the transit system in your city be threatened with a
shutdown? _Yes I-No
51 Wastewater Treatment Construction Grants
The proposed FY86 budget calls for a four year phaseout of
wastewater treatment construction grants, with a likely
schedule to be a 25 percent reduction in each of the next
four years. During those four years, federal funding would
only be available for completing existing projects.
Beginning in FY86 no fu-_n n wou be available or r,ew
projects. If this get were enactedr
a) Would your city be able to complete existing wastewater
• treatment facilities in four years, given a 25 percent
reduction in each of the next four years? x Yes No
b) Is your city operating tinder a consent decree,
administrative order or other binding contractual
agreement to comply with FY88 clean water standards?
Yes XNo
,
c) In the absence of federal funding, will your city be able
to meet these obligations without a significant increase
in taxes or user fees? N/A Yes No
Estimate the percent of tax or user fee increase required
i
d) Would the inability to complete an existing project or
construct a new project have a negative impact on (check
if relevant)
. X Housing
X Community development
X.Eronomic development
X Jobs
_X Environmental quality
66 Assisted Housing
a) The FY86 budget proposes a moratorium on all new units of
. assisted housing. What will. be the effect of this
moratoriuM on the availability of housing affordable by
low income people In your city?
None X Adverse ___,Very Adverse
• PAGE 4 CITY Denton, Texas
Explain Have received application for twenty (20) more unitso
b) Funds for the modernization of public housing, other than
for emergencies, would be eliminated for one year. What
would be the effect of this action on public housing in
your city,'
XNone Adverse -Very Adverse
c) What is the current waiting list for the following types
of assisted housing in your city?
Section 8 two (2) years months
section 23F'~'N/~Amonths
Public HouslngN/A months
What will be t eh effect of the proposed moratorium on
these waiting lists? X None They will be lengthened,
d) How many units did your city receive in each of the
following categories of assisted housing in FY84?
Section 8 None
_
Section 202 N/A
Public Housing N
Rental Rehabil tat on en g
e) How many projects eligible for Housing Development Action
Grants is your city now applying for or planning to apply
for? Not eligible.
How many tote units are involved?
What percentage of these units are for low income pe-o-pre-1
B
7. Loan Programs (Section 312, Section 108, EDA, SBA)
a) The FYQ6 budget proposes to eliminate section 312
re;iauilitation loaner Section 108 community development
loan guarantees, the Small Business Administration's loan
programs and the loan and grant programs of the Economic
Development Administration. What would be the effect on
your city of the elimination of these programs?
None X Adverse -.--.Very Adverse
Explain Never received section 312, intend to apply.
b) DidYyyoour city use the Section 312 loan program last year?
• Tryes, how much money and how many units were involved?
$ units
. PAQE S CITY Denton. Texas
c) Did your city use Section 108 loan guarantees during FY84?
Yes __No
dyes, how much money was guaranteed by this program in
your city last year? $
d) Did your city receive funds from the Economic Development
Administration during FY84? Yes -)LNo
If year how much? $
8. Employment and Training
a) The FY86 budget proposes to eliminate the Jobs Corps, to
cut the summer youth employment program by $100 million
(12 percent) in FY85 and by another $60 million (19.4
percent in total) in FY86, and to cut the dislocated
worker program by $120 million in PY85 (51 percent) and by
another $15 million (57 percent in total) in FY86, what
will be the effect of these cuts on your city?
_None Adverse Very Adverse
Explain Some departments depend on sunmer help to auement revular
staff and cover for additional sower activitigs. le, parks AW
Recreation, Library.
b) How many young people in your city are served by the Jobs
Corps?_ 95
Are alternative serv ces available to them in your city?
Yea A.No
WTat will happen to these young people if the program is
eliminated? llWlbyment for unskilled workers will increase.
The Job_Corp- is the on1X means available for some to be trained in a
semi-skilled area. No alternative means to train neglected portion
Of co comity.
c) Flow many young people in your city will be forced from the
summer youth employment program if it is cut this summer?
2 next summer? 25.
Are other jobs programs available or t em? Yes X No
what will happen to these young people? These eo~le t Willy
borhoods and eventually becrine in~volyed in som24ind of
trouble-
9. Health
a) The FY86 budget proposes to cut $1.1 billion from the
Medicaid program, capping federal matching payments to the
states. Do you anticipate a reduction in services or a
reduction in the number of people served as a result?
(Check if appropriate)
. Services cut .Yes No
People cut -X.Yes No
9 a. r
PAGE 6 CITY Denton,-Texas
b) The PY86 budget proposes to freeze health block grants
• (maternal and child health, prevention, primary care, and
alcohol, drug abuse and mental health) at PY85 levels and
to cut various public health programs such as
immunization, tuberculosis control, and sexually
transmitted disease control. Do you expect the incidence
of infant mortality, childhood diseases, tuberculosis, or
sexually transmitted diseases to rise as a result?
Infant mortality X Yes No
Child diseases =Yes No
Tuberculosis =Yes NO
Sexually transmitted-diseases Yes No
c) Does your city operate a local health department?
Yes No
,yes, will it experience an increase in local costs as a
result of a shifting of costs and responsibilities for
services from other local providers? X Yes No
10, Will your city government be able to raise local revenues to
compensate for any of the federal cuts described in questions
one through nine? Yes No
if year check below for which program areas and by which kind
of tax your city would raise local revenues
• Property Sales Income User
Tax Tax Tax Fees Other
Assisted Housing
DBG
UDAG
Loan Programs
Em o . 6 Train,
Health
Public Transit
Wastewater Treat.
Other Programs
11. Do you expect your state government to provide funds to your
city to compensate for the cuts? Yes y No
if yes, please check those program areas for which you expect
your state to provide funds and indicate the percentage of
the cut you expect the state to restore,
Assisted Housing
CDBG $
UDAG $
.Loan Programs 1
`Employment and Training
i
Health 4
-Transportation
Wastewater Treatment
. PAGE 7 CITY Denton, Texas
12. Surplus/Deficit
a) For the current fiscal year are you now facing an
operating budget deficit,
operating budget surplus, or
balanced budget?
b) If yuu are facing a surplus or a deficit► what percent of
total revenues does this represent? N/A _e
c) If you expect a surplus this year, is this surplus already
committed to ongoing se-vices?N/A_Yes __No
d) What is your city'a fiscal year?october 1 - September 30
e) Check which budget adjustment, if any, your city made in
the last fiscal year to achieve a balanced budget.
Property tax increases
User fee increases
Income tax increases
-Other tax hikes
Service cutbacks
Hiring freezes or layoffs
• -Other (explain)
13, Tax Proposals
The Treasury Department has proposed a tax plan which
proposes to end the tax exemption of all private purpose
bonds, to curta:y the charitable contribution deduction, to
eliminate all rehabilitation and historic preservation tax
credits and to eliminate the deductability of all state and
local taxes, including property taxess
a) Check the types of projects that would be jeopardized in
your city if the exemption for private purpose bonds is
terminated.
Infrastructure projects
Resource recovery
X Airports
--Ports
Low income housing
k Hospitale
(Economic development activities
Other (explain)
b) What would be the effect in your city of terminating all
rehabilitation and historic tax credits?
None Adverse Very Adverse
. How many pro eats are currenETy pending in your city for
which you plan to make use of these tax credits?Uncertain,
PAGE 8 CITY Mntnn. Tpxae
c) Will social services in your city be adversely affected by
Treasury's plan to curtail the charitable contribution
deduction?
Yea No
d) what do you expect will be the result in your city if the
current deduction for state and local taxes were
eliminated?
More difficulty raising local taxes
-More difficulty
effect on real estate values
Other effect (explain)
NO effect
PERSON P T . TI RE
Name Mark L. McDaniel
Title Administrative Intern
Agency_ City Manag2 Is Office
Address 215 East McKinney. Denton. Texas 76201
Telephone 817 ) 566-8308
PLEASE MAIL THIS OUrSTIONNAIRE NO LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1985 TOs
U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
• 1620 EYE STREETr NaWs
WASHINGTONi D.C. 20006
TSANX YouI
1 71
Government Finance Officers Association
Policy statement
Federal Tax Poiicv
The ;overnment Finance Officers Association has reviewed the
various proposals to reform the existing federal tax system and
has concerns about the impact these proposals may have on the
ability of state and local governments to continue to finance
their projects and raise revenues. Therefore, the Government
Finance Officers Association urges the Congress and the Adminia-
tration to consider the following statements, which are consis-
tent with all previous policy positions taken by this Associa-
tion, in any modification of the federal income tax structure:
SHIFTING BURDENS Federal tax policy changes that increase
the cost of state and local government will result in
reduced services and increased state and local taxes and/or
user charges. Therefore, taxpayers, who federal policy mak-
ers intend to aid with revisions to the federal tax system,
will have their tax burdens shifted to other levels of
government and will experience less than the full benefit,
if any, of modifications to the federal tax system.
TAXATION OF INTEREST ON STATE AND LOCAL ORLTGATTONS The
federal system of government is based upon the Constitution-
al doctrine of reciprocal immunity. Therefore, the federal
government cannot tax the interest on obligations issued by
states and local governments and states and local govern-
ments cannot (and do not) tax the interest on federal
government obligations. No tax should be imposed, either
directly or indirectly, on the interest paid on state and
local government obligations issued to provide services to
the public. Examples of direct and indirect taxation are
the imposition of the individual minimum tax on the interest
on state and local obligations and the inclusion of tax-ex-
empt interest in the income base of social security recipi-
ents.
The use of the term 'su!~sidy• in connection with tax
exe,mdtion should be discontinued. This term distorts the
role of the states and local governments in the federal
system of government because it treats the interest exclu-
sion as if were merely granted by Congressional grace rather
than as a Constitutional right.
PRIVATE-RURPOSE RONDS The Association opposes the
unrestricted issuance of tax-exempt *conduit" bonds and
other bonds that are for the primary benefit of private
users. The Association has supported restrictions on
these types of financings because of their impact on the
cost, of borrowing for public purposes, but it believes
atbitrary volume caps are trot an appropriate way to deal
with the issue.
As long as small-issue industrial development bonds, private
pollution control bonds and other forms of tax-exempt
financings for private users continue, suitable restrictions
should be imposed in order to limit these forms of financing
to specifically defined areas and purposes.
REDPPINiTTON 0 ` ' The
definition of private-activity industrial development bonds
includes not only bonds issued by state and local govern-
ments for private industrial development, but also bonds
issued to provide essential government services such as
airport and water and sewer facilities. The Association
supports a redefinition of the term "industrial development
bond" to exclude public-purpose projects from the current
definition and to remove restrictions on those bonds that
are designed to affect private-purpose financings.
RARKET P0RNNIQ.A In recent years, the
market for tax-exempt 60ftcipal obligations has been
supported by individual investors whose marginal tax rates
rose with increases in income because of high inflation.
At the same time, the demand for tax-exempt obligations by
banks and other financial institutions decreased because
of the reduced profitability of these institutions, the
expansion of competing ways to reduce taxable income, and
tax law changes affecting the deduction taken by banks and
other financial institutions for the costs incurred in
buying and carrying tax-exempt obligations. Historically
banks and other financial inetitutiono have been major
investors in municipal bonds.
Tne Association opposes any reduction in the deduction taken
for such costa under the corporate minimum tax because it
will further diminish institutional buyers' willingness to
buy municipal bonds.
ag$jsBaQD The investment of bond proceeds at market
rates for a reasonable period of time pending their applica-
tion for the purposes of the bond issue is good cash
7anagenent. Arbitrage, which is the term used to describe
the interest earned on invested bond proceeds in excess of
the interest being paid on the bonds, reduces the cost of
public projects by reducing the total amount of bonds issued
for a project. State and local governments should not be
penalized for practicing good financial management by being
required to 'rebate' such investment earnings to the
u.S. Treasury or by the imposition of other restrictions.
- 2
LQ~6 OYPTC at•Q Proposals and
• legislation have emanated from the Congreeo and Administra-
tion with growing frequency that have substantial adverse
impacts on state and local governments in general and the
municipal bond market in particular. Some examples include
restrictions on governmental leasing, tax legislation with
retroactive effective dates and state-by-state volume caps
on municipal bonds.
Congress is urged to hold meaningful public hearings on all
tax legislation after it has been introduced and Treasury
Department officials are urged to have meaningful discus-
sions with state and local officials about problems that are
believed to exist in order to afford a better opportunity to
solve perceived problems with the minimum disruption of
federal/state/local relations.
- 3
ai 1
Pub's; Seftu; Ocs Ass*-"Anon
Qna', crld?rod ctnter
i:.- Yerk: t;c.oYO-k'CcIS
F S,;- December 31, 1984
The Honorable Donald T. Regan
Secretary of the Treasury
Department of the Treasury
Washington, D.C. 20220
Dear Mr. Secretary%
The Public Securities Association urges the Department of the
Treasury to reconsider its proposals regarding state and local
government securities as advocated in "Tax Reform for Fairness,
Simplicity and Economic Growth,*
For more than a century, state and local governments have
issued tax-exempt securities in order to provide their citizens
with necessary infrastructure and other capital improvements judged
byretheir elected officials to be of vital public purpose as defined
by state law. These have included both general obligation bonds
and revenue bonds funded through user 1'ees and other financing
arrangements geared to promote the public welfare through
partnership with private entities, both not-for-profit and
profit-making.
With the expectation of further reductions and eliminations
in federal grant programs to states and localif-fes and continued
.pressure on the local, state and federal levels to maintain taxes
at current or reduced levels, the ability of state and local
governments to borrow in the tax:exempt market is of paramount
importance as a financial tool. In addition, the current Treasury
Department proposal denies basic notions of Federalism and would
severely restrict the sovereignty of the states.
The proposal establishes a category of municipal securities
termed "private purpose non-governmental." This apparently refers
to projects where there is a greater than de minimus connection to
a non-governmental entity. This would inciide Cones issued to
finance airports, ports, water supply facilities, electric
generating facilities, resource recovery plants, health care
facilities and low income housing among others, or about 62 percent
of all municipal bonds issued in 1983. Such projects fall into the
widely accepted and long established categories of public purpose.
The Treasury's contention that such projects do not serve a public
purpose at the Mate and local government level cannot be sustained
C. a
.
t Honorable Donald T. Regan
December 31, 1961
Page Two
and does a disservice to the discussion at nand. We note that when
the same types of projects are funded at the federal level they are
deemed to constitute a valid public purpose.
Indeed, the proposed requirement that'no more than one
percent of the revenue generated from a bond issue be used directly
or indirectly by a private entity is unclear on its face. We are
concerned that such a requirement will have the effect of limiting
significantly the ability of staf:es to issue general obligation and
so-called "traditional" revenue securities on a tax-axempt basis.
Depending on the definition and associated interpretations, such a
provision could effectively curtail issuances representative of 701
80, or even 90 percent of the municipal market in 1963. Such a
broad attack on state sovereignty, cloaked in the name of tax
reform, is repugnant,
Further, we believe that a partnership between government and
private enterprise to provide for the needs of the citizenship.is
beneficial. The expertise of private enterprise has properly been
combined with governmental public purpose to improve the quality of
lY a at the state and local level and should continue to do so.
The apparent a riori belief that such a combination is wrong
leaves us bewtldere .Nevertheless, perhaps the gravest problem
with the Treasury's restrictive definition of so-called "private
p:;rpose" is its usurpation of the fundamental ability of states and
localities to determine what is necessary for the public good on
the state and local level. We are dismayed that the Treasury
Department believes it knows Bette: what is in the best interest of
states and localities than do the duly elected officials of state
and local governments such a conclusion seems to be at odds with
the Administration's early support for a "New Federalism."
Moreover, the proposal ignores the common sense reality that
public purpose is an evolving concept. While building the Erie
Canal may have been a public purpose over a century ago, airports
and health care facilities along with economic development are
identifiable public purposes today. Any static and arbitrary
definition of public purpose such as that proposed by the
Treasury utterly obstructs the ability of governments to meet
changing circumstances and public needs.
In its attet.,pt to mandate how and what types o: securities a
state or locality may issue, the Treasury Department proposal would
deny "on behalf of" authorities the ability to issue tax-exempt
securities. These authorities have issued tax-exempt securities
•
Honorable Donald T. Regan
December 311 1984
Page Three
for many years and essentially all of them are empowered by duly
enacted state statutes. An earlier attempt by the Treasury
Department'to limit their ability to issue ~ax exempt bonds during
the 1970's wa3 withdrawn due to its unwor'• lity. We believe that
this proposal would limit the freedom of states and :localitier to
determine how best to issue debt without providing any
countervailing benefit.
On its face the proposal adds stringent restrictions to the
issuance of bonds that even Treasury considers "governmental." In
An apparent attempt to establish the premise with states and
localities that the tax exemption is provided by the grace of We
federal government, it would require costly and bureaucratic
reporting of all bond issues to the federal government. This
proposal -snacks of federal government chauvinism. We are deeply
concerned that it represents the first step towards requiring prior
federal review of state and local government bond issues.
Additionally, the proposal to impose severely restrictive
arbitrage limits, in addition to those currently in place, will
rfiguire states and local governmentu to increase the size of bond
issues to accomplish any given purpose. The proposed reoate of
"excess arbitrage" to the federal government appears to us to be
nut of step with any theory of inter-governmental comity. The
proposal to all but eliminate advance refundings will curtail state
and local governments' ability to take advantage of reductions in
interest rates as well as to alleviate overly restrictive bond
indentures. As a result, the cost of finance for states and
localities. can be expected to increase, and this added cost will be
-passed on to local and state taxpayers.
In addition to proposing to narrow severely the scope of
public purpose, the Treasury Department has declared its view that
the tax-exemption of state and local government securities is an
anachronism. The language of the proposal leaves one with the
conclusion that in the view of Treasury tax-exemption is a mere
"subsidy" provided to states and localities by the federal
government that may be withdrawn, tie strongly disagree, as do most
local and state governmental officials. The Constitutional
doctrine of reciprocal immunity prohibits state taxation of
interest on U.S• Government obligations just as it prohibits
federal taxation of interest on state and local government
obligations. It is a doctrine established in the early years of
the Republic and reaffirmed with specific respect to state and
municipal debt in numerous Suppereme Couct decisions extending over
almost a Century. The recenty.developed assertion of Treasury
that tax exemption of states and municipal debt is a "subsidya,
"granted" by the Adfainistration is just not so. Such an assertion
~5' ~ '~1 r •.F/ ra Say +r_9a`r Yi.~p-r .~F.,'I r •i 1 o r, r~t~'~ l' t'rT__•r ,~__4_c_,~. ~ . ,n. i .s'y°-~*T-"~t~;
l .
Honorable Donald T. Regan
December 31, 1984
Page Four
can only detract from the quality of responsible debate on the
subject.
Most alarming are statements of Ronald A. Pear xan, nominee
for Assistant Secretary of Tax Policy, that Treasury is considering
proposals to eliminate the tax exemption for all municipal
securities including general obligation bonds: 'Mr. Pearlman stated
that Treasury has the power to eliminate the tax-exemption on such
securities and that the theory behind the Treasury tax reform plan
would argue for totally removing the exemption for
governmental obligations." The remarks of Mr. Pearlman indicate
that the proposals of Treasury are ultimately intended to remove
the tax exemption from all state and local government securities.
In this light, the arguments made by Treasury regarding so-called
public and private purpose municipal bonds assume the appearance of
a mere subterfuge for its true goal of eliminating tax-exemption
entirely. We are troubled by the misdirection of such an approach
acid dis~a,eyed by the lack of respect it demonstrates for state
sovreignty, local government responsibility and the long history of
Cdpstitutional doctrine and legislation surrounding the subject.
There are other elements in the set of proposals which will
impact the market for municipal securities and therefore the cost
at which state aad local governments can accomplish financing.
These range from the proposed elimination of deductability of
carrying charges for municipal bonds for financial institutions to
the proposed indexation for inflation of interest on taxable
securities. We do not oppose tax "Aimplification" or the ;eduction
of marginal tax rates. We are very concerned, however, that the
Administration#'Congress and the public thoroughly understand the
implications of any specific legislation which proposes to make
such sweeping changes in the basic tax structure of the nation.
To that end, our Association, as well as a number of our
-members, are currently conducting and commissioning studies to
estimate the impart of all these proposals on states and
localities. To aid us in conducting these studies we request your
Department to provide us with the methodology it utilizes to
measure the alleged revenue loss brought about by state and local
government securities, as well as proposed definitions of "direct
and indirect use" and other ambiguous concepts put forward in the
Treasury plan. Whon our analysis is complete, we will share tto
results of these studies with you, your staff, the Congress and the
general public.
The Public Securities Association is the national trade
association of dealers, brokett, and banks that trade, underwrite
and sell municipal, mortgage backed and M i 'goverrment
id I lY m 4.~;r k'r Ly y~ sy } C^~ "I . Y~ I
Hj ^F ,N;ti y'A r' h 'vg T t'4 r,.; ~iy r A, ri± 4. . 1 ~c, ~•5 R, I.:
G~ r g fit:'
Honorable Donald T. Regan
December 31, 1984
Page Five
securities. Last year PSA members underwrote over 9S per cent of
the state and local government securities issued. We genuinely are
eager to engage in a thoughtful dialogue with you and your staff
regarding these proposals.
The Treasury proposal while not perfect, is an important
attempt to serve the public interest. However, we are very
seriously troubled by the components of the Treasury proposal which
are directed at the issuance and use of proceeds of tax-exempt
municipal bonds and urge the Treasury Department to re-evaluate
them. We would be pleased to discuss these matters with you at
your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
*Roert C. Brown
t Chairman 1984
s Association
1j
Public r1985
can J Chair publ Securit
ies Association
V -777 T,7! _1 71 NV I
City Council minutes
/ t fO
February 190 1985
rho Council convenes into the Work Session at 5 30 p.m. in the Qivit:1
Defense Room.
PRBSENrt Mayor Pro Tom Chewt Council Members Alford, Hopkirp,
iMcAdams, and Rlddlesperger
City Manager, Acting City Attotney and City Secretary
ABSdNrs Mayor Stewart was attending a meeting with TMPA
financial advisors in New York
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real Istmte, board appointments and personnel. No
official action was !"otken.
Due to interested members in the audience, agenda item 04 was moved
forward in the agenda order.
4. Receive a status report on Kerley Street bird roost and
consider approval of alternative solutions.
Harlan Jefferson, Administrative Assistant in the Public Works
Department, reported that staff was recommending habitat
modification for the Kerley Street roost. Two methods were
suggested. One would be to trim one-third of the traps and the
other method was the removal of the trees with the exception of
leaving 1 tree per 20 feet radius. Tree removal was the superior
al ernative co modify this habitat. An ordinance had been developed
wh ah would require trees In a roost area be spaced IS (set apart
and the property be clear of debris and vegetation. An exception
would be an area of 4 or more acres which was toned agricultural,
under single ownership and more than 200 feet from any adjacent
property, with houses, under different ownership and more than 200
feet from a public street or right of way. Notice would be given to
owners to abate. After proper notification, if the owner did not
clear the property, the city would Cut and clear the land and tta
owner would be charged the cost of the clearing plus an
administrative fee of $80. The property owner could appeal the
charge (+githin 15 days) to the City Council. Failure to comply with
the provisions of the ordinance would constitute a misdemeanor and
carry a fine of not less than Il0 or more than iMD. The ordinance
was being reviewed by the City Attorney's office and wouli be placed
on the March 5 agenda for approval.
Council Member Stephens stated that under this habitat modification
plan, clear cutting might be done of a sizeable area and trees meant
money, Hai the staff worked out that problem.
Jefferson responded the proposed ordinance was the same as the
existing weed abatement ordinance,
City Manager Chris Hartung stated that the problem with this type of
bird roost was that it was always on private property.
Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported
that the Kerley Street roost had been partially cleared in 1983,
with the permission of the property owner.
Mayor Pro Tom Chow asked how much time a property owner would have
to clear the land after receiving notification.
Jefferson responded 10 days.
Mayor Pro Tom Chow then asked when would the notices be sent.
Jefferson replied 14 days after approval of the ordinance.
Mayor Pro rem Chow asked when the birds wouli return to the Kerley
Street roost.
Angelo responded in early May.
r ~ t City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Two
I
C iouncil Member Riddleeperger asked how many property owners wer•
nvolved. ,
Jefferson responded only 1 at the Xorley Street egret roost.
Trimming would be done at various blackbiri roosts.
Council Member Stephens stated that previous experience was that the
birds just moviA to another location.
Jefferson reported that the egrets would stay near water and staff
felt the habitat modification might cause them to move out of Denton.
Council Member McAdams stated that the Council should be sure about
the ordinance as there were several blackbird roosts in town. The
Council should be sure that this was what they wanted to enforce
throughout the city.
rho Council recognised Ms. Lillie Clark.
Ms. Clark stated that she was a resident of Kerley Street and the
problem with the roost was not only the roost area, but the bird
would wander into residents's yards. Ms. Clark also stated that the
birds would return in March, not May and after 1 bird had come in,
the roost was established. She asked the Council to give the matter
consideration now.
The consensus of the Council was to have the proposed ordinance on
the agenda for March 5.
The Council then returned to the regular agenda crier.
2. The Council considered revision and update of the City's
four single member election districts (Districts 1, 2, 3, an.i 4) to
account for annexations.
Acting City Attorney Joe Morris reported that he had reviewei
matgrials for the upcoming election and problems had been discovered
with the ordinance which ostablishei the single member districts.
The districts were set out by census tracts and some were incorrect
in the last ordinance. No revisions hal been maim to accommodate
annexations since 1982. The annexations on the Council a;enda for
this meeting would have to be included. the timing was unfortunate
as any changes before an election required preclearatce from the
Justice Department and the changes required a public hearing before
submission.. There had been 19 annexations since the last
preclearance) however, most involved few people. Morris then
,yresentei a map of the city with the liatrict lines, precinct lines
and census tracts included. He then reported that the first problem
was in District 1. The description of Mingo Road was incorrect.
the 3istrict line should have followed the precinct line which would
put the area in District 1 instead of District 3 as was shown on the
map. The second problem was that census tract 207 between Oak and
Hickory appeared in District 4 on the sin;le member district map but
the ordinance called for the tract to be in District 1.
Council Member McAdams asked if staff would need to prepare a
breakdown of the population changes due to the annexations by
percentages of minorities.
Morris responded not there were no significant changes.
Council Member McAdams asked if census tract 207 could be added to
District 4 in the ordinance so as not to split the County precinct
lines.
Morris responded yes.
Council Member Rlddlesperger stated that It hai been attempted in
the redistricting in 1962 to follow the precinct lines.
v Ty:} e f lTka T ,"•.J Fat#V J;4 v*!. 5*.~,.:_•a 7 ` i 11F !
City Counofl Minutes
Meeting of February 191 1989
Page Three
Morris added that the intent was to preserve minori~.y distribution
throughout all the districts. He further stated that the Council
could meet on.February 26 to hold the public hearing and approve tM
new district ordinance.
3. The Council considered setting a time and date for a
special meeting to hold a public hearing and approve an ordinance
revising and updating the City's four single member districts
(Districts is 2, 3, and 4) to account for annexations.
rho consensus of the Council was to hold a public hearing at 530
p.m. on Tuesday, February 26 regarding the addition of the
annexations to the district map and to approve a new district
ordinance.
S. The Council received an update on the City of Denton's
Affirmative Action Program.
Kathryn Usrey, Director of Personnel, reported that the information
furnished to the City Council in the agenda back-up material was
current. Since the Affirmative Action Program had been initiated,
improvements had been made but there was still room for more
improvement. Time was being spent in new employee orientation
explaining the Affirmative Action Program and the open door policy.
The City was currentlyy using a program of developmental tracking to
advance personnel in-hawse and a signtficant increase in time had
been made to coach supervisors and managers on the Affirmative
Action Program. The Personnel Department was providing career
counseling to allow all employees the opportunity to move up in the
organisation. Staff was constantly monitoring procedures for EEO
compliance and had located a minority radio station on which to
advertise for open positions with the City. Inereasol training was
being done with supervisors to eliminate discrimination.
Council Member McAdams stated that the information provided showed
the hiring done by the City from a County work pool of individuals
and she would like to see just the available work pool for the city
only.
Usrey responded that the Texas Employment Commission furnished data
on the available work pool of the entire County and not just the
City. One reason was that many City of Denton employees did not
live in the city limits.
Council Member McAdams asked for the title and department of all
minorities in the city organisation.
Usrey stated that she would furnish Council Member McAdams with that
information.
6. Discussion of the City of Denton City Council strat,3ic
plan.
Due to lack of timo, this item was not discussed.
The Council then convenoJ into the Raluler Meeting at 7 00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers.
PRdSdNre Mayor Pro Tom Chew1 Council Members Alford, Hopkins,
McAdams, and Riddlesparger
City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City secretary
ABSENro Mayor Stewart was atteniing a meeting with TMPA
financial advisors in New York
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Hosting of January 151 19851 the Special Called Meeting of
January 240 19851 the Special Called Meeting of January 261 19851
and the Special Called Meeting of January 29s 198S.
McAdams motion, Alford second to approve the Minutes am presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
5 ''.r ~ ' --Jim ~ , 1'°r F 1 ~ t i ' ' i .9}i. y
d
u
City council minutes
Hooting of February 19, 1985
Page Four
2. Consent Agenda
City Manager Chfis Hartung asked the Council to pul?, item 2,C.1 from
the Consent Agenda,
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented with the exception of item 2.C.I. Motion carried
unanimously.
Consent Agendas
A. Buis and Purchase Ordtrsi
1. did 1 9372 - Power transformer
2. Hid / 9385 - Asphalt distributor
3. Bid 1 11391 - Loop 288 waterline
4. Bid 1 9314 - Developer/pa.ticipatton streets
Weston Development Corporation
5, Bid 1 9402 - Miscellaneous electrical hardware
6. Purchase Order 4 66837 to Miedermeyer-Martin
Company in the amount of 631,551.24
7. Purchase order 4 67026 to AMP Special Industries
in tha amount of !16,255.00
8. Plats artj replatel
1. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the
Claude Hill Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
2. Approval of final replat of the Allan zstates
Mobile Home Pack. (The Planning snd Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the
John A. Hann's Addition, Block 11 Lot IA
(formerly King Addition). (The Planning an-i
Zoning Commission recommends approval.!
4. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the
W, W. Wright Addition, Block 2, Lot 3R. (The
Planning ant Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
PULLdD BY C, Change Orders!
STAFF
1. Consiier approval of Change Order 01 with Hogan
and Rasor on the design phase of the high service
pumping facility to serve the higher elevations
of the northwest Denton area. (The Public
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
The Mayor Pro Tom then presented it Proclamation for Patriotism Week
beginning on February 18 through 24,
Charles Hopkins, member of the Americanism Committee of the 61ks
Club, accepted the Proclamation.
3. The Council recognised Mr. Carl Young requesting aprovat
for the use of Fred Moore Park on June 19, 20, 21 and 22 for the
purpose of a Junsteenth celebration, a waiver of the tae for the use
of the park and an extension of the curf4W to 12100 midnight.
7 C - t f r ~ 1 ~
%
i
„City Council Minutes
Meetingq of February 19, 1985
Page Pive
Mr. Carl Young, President of the Denton County Viet Nam Veteraws
Association, appeared and requested the use of Fred Moore Park for
the Juneteenth celebration. Mr, Young stated that there would be a
parade, slow pitch ball tournament, domino and spade tournaments as
well as free cokes and hot dogs for the children.
Hopkins motion, Stephens second to grant the request for the use of
Fred Moore Park on June 19, 20, 21 and 221, a waiver of the fee for
the park ani an extension of the curfew to 12x00 midnight.
Mr. Young then stated that the association had planned for the
summer to institute a job program to match kids with jobs. There
would also be an Easter egg hunt in April. Mr. Young then read a
list of the merchants who had donated goods to the Juneteenth
celebration and expressed his thanks for their support.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. The Council recognised representatives of the North Texas
State University Student Association requesting approval to collect
contributions for the United Way from City of Denton streets and
medians.
Mr. Jud Richards, representing the North Texas State University
Student Association, stated that donations would be solicited from
streets and medians on March 2 from WOO &,n. u.,til 4e00 p.m. All
collected oonoy would be given to the United way.
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to approve the request to
collect contributions from the streets and medians. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 31.027
acres of land beginning at the southwest corner of Ryan Roai an.4
Teasley Lane (FM 2181). A-8
Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported
that 1 reply form had been mailed with 0 returned, This was the
last step in the annexation process.
The following ordinance was presented
40. 65-28
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONrtGUOUS AND
ADJACENT r0 tU CITY OF DENrOd, TEXASI BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APFROXIMACELY 34.173
ACRES OF LAND LYtSJ AND BEING SIrUACED IN THE COUNTY OF
DBNTON, STATE OF CEXAS AND SSING PART OF CHE SLI PIC<ETr
SURVEY, ABSrRACr NO. 1010, D2,4TON COUNTY, CdXASr
CLASStFYINO THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPBRTYI
AND DECLARING ANY EFFECTIVE DATE,
Riddlesperger motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Chew Motion
carried unanimously.
6. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance anl service
plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 5.70 al:res
beginning north of Highway 380 West and adjacent and west of Misch
Branch Roai. A-9
The following ordinance was presented)
Ci►.y council Minutes
Meeting of February 14, 1985
Page Six
NO. 85-29 ►
,
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LA.+1D CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT 'TO THE CITY OF DENrON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROX1,4ATELY 5.70
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEINO Struhm IN THE COUNTY OF
DdNTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE S. HUIZAR
SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 514, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING
rHE SAM3 PS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARINO AN EFFECTIVE DATI.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the or-finance. On roll
call vottr, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "sya," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Rlddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Chew "aye." Motion
cartisd unanimously.
7, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 131.761
acres beginning south of Robinson Road and east of Nowlin koad.
A-10
rho following ordinance was presented
NO. 85-30
AN ORDINANCE 1.NNEXING A TRACI OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 130,55
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS A.YD BdING PART OF THE B. MERCHANT
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 90. 800, DEN'r04 COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING
THE SAM AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPSRrYt AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIV9 DATE.
Hopkins motion, Step!-.ens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"ayo," Rlddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
8. rho Council considered adoption of an ordnance and service
plan annexing approximately 112 acres beginning west of I-35 N
service road, north of Marshall Road, and east of the Topeka and
Santa Fe Railroa3. A-12
The following ordinance was pre3entedi
00. 85-31
I1,Y ORDINANCd ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF Oevm rEXAS; RZING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 111.71
ACRES Of L,1ND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COU14TY OF
D$ 1trON, STATE OF TEXAS AND 83ING PART OF THE B.S.B. 6
G.R.R. CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 141, AND THE R. WHITLOCK
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1403, DENTON COUNTY, TEXASt
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPdRTYi
AND DECLARINO AN EFFdCTIVE DATE.
Rid1lesp6rgor motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Aifor3
"ayo," Rlddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Teo Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
The Council left the regular agenda order and considerod the
aliendum.
1, The Council recognised representatives of the North Texas
State Fair Association to present an update report on the
possibility of development of a North Texas State Arena nd
Exposition Center.
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Seven
Mr. Weldon 4urgoon, President of the North Texas State Fair
Association, reported that he wished to clarify the preselnt
situation. A meeting of the association had been held on February
14 and 55 new members were accepted. The total membership now stood
at 203, rho purpose of this appe&tance before the Council was to
give a status report on the proposed arena and exposition center and
to request the 11 unallocated hotel/motel occupancy tax. The
present facilities at the fairgrounds were too small. A steering
committee had looked at arena in other cities and were recommending
one similar to the complex in Austin. Available sites had then been
researched. A auitabLe site had been located and the association
was attempting to purchase the parcel. Mr. Burgoon concluded by
stating that the association felt they had met all of the guidelines
to qualify for the it hotel/motel occupany tax as a means to assist
in the funding of the project.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he thought this was one of
the best things that had been presented for the citizens in Denton.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the report was very impressive
and he was enthutastic about the project.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that he wanted to make the
Council aware that the staff was preparing a similar request for the
It unallocated hovel/motel occupancy tax to be used for renovations
to the Civic Center.
9. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Charles S. Watkins representing S. L, Archer (owner) requesting the
establishment of a planned development district (PD) under article
11 of the Denton Zoning Ordinance in respect to a tract of 31.027
acres o' '.arid situated at the southwestern corner of the Ryan Road
and Tea Lane intersection. If approved the planned development
districk D) would permit the following developmentso
17 acres of single family housing (SF-6) with a density of
approximately 5.6 units per acre
10 acres of multi-family cluster housing with a density of
17 units per acre
4 acres of general retail and general service type uses
Z-1702
rho mayor pro rem opened the public hearing.
Mr. Charlie Watkins, representing Mr. Archer, spoke in favor stating
that to the north of the property was an existing mobile home park,
to the south was vacant land, to the east was a mobile home park and
to the west was vacant. There would be 95 6,000 square feet lots
for site built homes and cluster housing at a 17 unit per acre
density.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor Pro rem closed the public hearing.
Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner, reported that 4 reply
forms had been mailed with 0 returned. This was a low intensity
area and the proposad planned development complied with the Denton
Development Guide. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approvals
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to approve the petition with the
conditions as attached by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Notion carried unanimously.
City Council Ninutas
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page tight
B. -The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Myera Development Corporation requesting the establishment 'of
planned development (PD) zoning on a 131.7 acre tract of land
lo.-ated on the east side of Nowlin Road approximately 1,200 feet
south of Robinson Road. If approved, the planned development would
permit the following land usess
Multi-Family - approximately 221 units on 12.3 acres with a
density of 18 units per acre
Cluster Homes - approximately 252 units on 42 acres with a
density of 6 units per acre
Noighboritood Shopping - 2.6 acres
Single Family - approximately 6 units on 2.1 acres with a
density of 3 units per acre
Patio Homes - approximately 83 unite on 12.6 acres with a
density of 6.5 units per acre
Satate Homes - approximately 45 unite on I.S.I. acres with a
density of 3 units per acre
Two Family Garden Homes - approximately 60 units on 9.2
acres with a density of 6.5 units per acre
Gol: Course - approximately 34.4 acres 2-1706
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing.
Mr. Craig Curry, representing Nelson Corporation, spoke in favor of
the petition stating that this proposal had previously been before
the Council during the public hearings on annexation. A portion of
this development was on Interstate 35 and the petitioner was now
asking for zoning on the remaining parcel. Mr. Curry then presented
conceptual maps of the development for the Council's information.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor Pro Tem closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that 8 reply
forms had been mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 returned in
opposition. This petition was for a portion of the larger Oakmont
Development. A portion of Oakmont was located within the city
limits of Denton And a portion within the city limits of Corinth.
The property had been annexed by Council action earlier in the
agenda and the petitioners were now requesting zoning. This
development added a new dimension to diversity of available housing
types for Denton due to the golf course occupying approximately 201
of the property. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the petition. Motion
carried unanimously.
C. rho Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Burke engineering, representing Tri-Steel Structures, requesting the
estbiishment of office (0) district zoning classification on a tract
of five (5) acres of land situated west of and abutting Masch Branch
Road and north of U. S. Highway 380 and more fully described as lot
to block 1, Tri-Steel Headquarters Addition. If approved, the site
might be used for any type of development permitted in an office
district by the Denton Zonia. Ordinance. 2-1709
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor Pro rem closed the public hearing.
Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner, reported that 7 reply
forms had been mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 returned in
c:
b df: My'a ; q r ~ ~ ✓ ' C h V Ly
City council minutes
Meeting of February 191 1985
Page Nine
opposition. This was a low intensity area and the proposal was for
5 acres of office use. :ae Otto was within the Denton -Municipal
Airport approach zone so that noise considerations and building
heights would have to be regulated. The Planning and Zoning
Commission had recommended approval.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to approve the petition. Motion
carried unanimously,
D. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Walter DeRonde requesting the establishment of light industrial (LI)
zoning on a 111.7 acre tract in the B.B.B. and C.R.R. Company
Survey, Abstract 141, and the R. Whitlock Survey. Abstract 1403.
The tract was located north of Westgate Hosrital and Medical Center,
aproximately 600 feet west of the interstate Highway 35 north
service road, and atjacent and east of the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Fe Railroad. Z-1712
rho Mayor Pro Tam opened the public hearing.
Mr. Charlie Watkins, representing Mr. DeRonde, spoke in favor of the
petition stating that thera were 3 owners of the tract of land. The
property was bounded on the south and east by light industrial zoned
land and on the west by a railroad track. It was located in a
moderate intensity node and the petitioner felt that light
industrial )and use was consis►ent and appropriate due to the
proxintty of the railroad tracks.
No one spoke in apposition.
Thn Mayor Pro Tom closed the public hearing.
Lanise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that the zoning
change would be from agriculatural to light industrial. The
annexation of the property had been approval by the Council earlier
in the agenda. The southern portion of the property was located in
a moderate intensity area and a portion was looateJ in a high
intensity area. That portion of the tract already within the city
limits was zonal light industrial. The Planning and Zoning
Commission fcit it 'was unlikely that any low density land use would
be passible for this tract. Two reply forms hat been mailed with
none returned.
McAdams motion, Riddlesperger second to approve the petition.
Motion carried unanimously.
S. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Charles Watkins, representing the owners, requesting a change in the
current zoning classifdcatioi from agricultural (A) to the planned
development (PD) district on a tract of approximately J7.6 acres
situated west of and abutting Loop 2R8 and north of and abutting
Aulra Lane and more fully described in the R.B. Longbottom Survey,
Abstract iA-775. If approved, the planned development (PD) would
permit the following mixed uses on the sites
10.7 acres of two family residential (2-F) with a density
of 11.2 units per acre
9.8 acres of multi-family housing with a density of 20
units per acre
4.1 acres o! warehouses
6.7 acres of retail/offices and showrooms
4.4 acres of offices and warehouses Z-1715
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing.
Mr. Charlie Watkins, representing $trader Properties, spoke in favor
of the pettA on stating that hie client was proposing duplexes on
the week side on 10,7 acres and multi-family on 10.8 acres. there
was an existing single family lovelopsent to the west of the
proposed development, To the north, the developer was proposing 4
7J'. xr, cC wqn a n f K L.q t ~~~r
s a ~ ~ ri r; f xn ijr t: x i yl n
g.,
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Ten
acres of warehouses. This was a low intensity area and the tract
was tin a 288, lc ofedthe totae 6S.5 i acres, 12 7eacresHiwerey required Loop
right-of-way for the 288 and 380 interchange and LO acres was an
existing single family neighborhood. Given the location and the
intersection, and the character of the land in this moderate
intensity node, the proposed petition wou l not be so bad.
No one Spoke in opposition.
The Mayor Pro Tem closed the public hearing,
Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner, reported that this
petition would be changing the boundaries of the moderate intensity
area. The calculations used regarding intensity/density were the
sale for all developments in Dentont however, this area was at the
intersection of two primary streets and staff felt there would be
traffic flow problems.
Council Member Stephens asked if the city did not want to have
businesses along this street, where would we put them,
Persaud responded that there were other locations for high intensity
uses and felt this .development at this location would create traffic
congestion.
Council Member Stephens str.ted that since the Denton Development
Guide had been written, Loop 288 and University Delve were subject
to major improvements.
Council Member McAdams stated that she was not so sure, University
Drive was nearly impossible to use to move traffic " the Golden
Triangle Mall was a monster. She further believed that for this
location, the development would be too much.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the proposed Loop 288 would not
go to the tall but would uled to t be fans dgo to Mayhtll Road. University
Drive was Also sched
Stephens motion, Riddlespergse seconi to approve the petition.
Motion carried 3 to 1 with Council Member McAdams casting the "nay"
vote.
F. Tne Coun it held a public hearing on the petition of
T. 3. Uland requesting a change in zoning from the multi-family
(FM-11 district to the office l0? zoning classification at 501
Parkway Street, The lot is located at the southwest corner of
Parkway Street and Carroll Boulevard and more particularly describ,id
as lot 8, block 2, of the First Arendment to the Fityt Installment
of the Carroll Park Addition. 2-1119
The Mayor Pro Tem opened the public rsaring.
Mr. Is 9, bland, the petitioner, spoke in favor and distributed
information to the Council. Mr. Uland stated that he felt that the
city staff had not been objective and the Planning and Zoning
Commission had recommended dental due to potential parking
problems. Mr. Uland presented slides of the location of his
petition and other office uses on Carroll Boulevard. The prgblem
with Carroll Boulevard was th9 private driveways which required
people to back out onto a mayor arterial. There was an article in
the statutes which stated that persons cannot back onto a major
arterial street. In addition, most people drove faster than the
speed limit which aided another hazard. Mr. Uland summarized by
stating that he did not feel it was fair for people living on
Carroll Boulevard to not be able to sell their property or the
highest and best use,
, f ✓ J .i a ~ ~ v C( , i ti ~ ",r 7P 1 1 k ;'n~~ a ~ x ! ~ ~ W^n ~ ,nr-~-`,_^.. -_~a~~ ~t w . i~:. ~ r 1T, Y^ ,
a .
.
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Eleven
Mr. Steve Griffins 607 Parkway, spoke in opposition stating that Jhe
was concerneda about the traffic which would be generated by 'an
office toning designation and did not feel it would be appropriate
in a neighborhood. The Red Cross building was located on this
section of Parkway a-A already created parking problems. He also
voiced concern regarding additional curb cuts on Parkway and seated
that there was no place for traffic to go. He did not feel this
would be an asset to the neighborhood.
Ms. Patti Griffin spoke in opposition stating that the homeowners on
Parkway were adamantly opposed to this petition. Parkway dead-ended
into Denton Street by the Junior High School. Carroll Boulevard had
problems with traffic but so did Parkway. She concluded by stating
that she felt the approval of this petition would ruin, the
neighborhood and residents were rstoring these homes and wanted to
maintain the residential flavor of the area.
Ms. Becky Crow spoke in opposition stating that she lived on Parkway
and was very proud of the neighborhood. No amount of money wo-ild
replace the homes located here if the area were to go commercial.
The traffic was a problem due to the parking situation created by
the proximity of the Junior High School.
Mr. Cook, 606 Parkway, spoke in opposition stating that he felt the
Planning and Zoning Commission was correct in recommending denial
for the petition.
The Mayor Pro Tom closed the public hearing.
The Mayor Pro Tom allowed Mr. Uland five minutes for rebuttal.
Mr. Uland stated that he appreciated the thoughts and concerns of
the people in the neighborhood but that the property was currently
zoned for apartments and he felt the office use would be less
offensive to the neighbors.
Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner, reported that 20 reply
forms had been sailed with 2 returned in favor and 2 returned in
opposition, This was a low intensity area and current land uses
already had exceeded the limit. The Denton Development Guide
encouraged the maintenance of older, existing neighborhoods. The
Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended denial of the
petition.
Riddlesperger motion, McAdams second to deny the petition. Motion
carried unanimously.
0. the Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Robert J, Caraway, represented by Charles Watkins, requesting a
change in the current zoning classification from agricultural (A) to
planned development (PD) district on a tract of 6.34 acres situated
south of U. S. Highway 380 in the vicinity of Cindy Lane and shown
in the William Bryan Survey, Abatract 0148, City of Denton, if
approved, the proposed planneJ development would permit the
following type of uses
2,17 acres of multi-family apartment development with a
density of 20 units per acre
4.17 acres of commercial type uses Z-1722
The Mayor Pro Tom op~nod the public hearing.
Mr, Charlie Watkins, representing the petitioner, spoke in favor
stating that this parcel was 6 acres of land located in a large
moderate intensity area on the south side of Highway 380. The
Council had recently approved light industrial zoning in this area,
His client had opted to request a planned development due to a
church which was located adjacent to the property, The proposed 43
hi' 1 f.Y r•.
< 4r 1 x i a r 'F': il. a .f 19N 1 iiV ~a(
S 7 Y'Y GI 4 rN SV Y l f i..✓ 1 k1 S r..
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Twelve
units of multi-family housing would bs located next to the church Ixto
buffer the commercial uses. This rulti-family development would
provide screening and open space. The commercial land use on .4
acres would be set back from the multi-family uie. Mr. Caraway had
agreed to the exclusions as reCOmxended by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked it there was 60 feet of
right-of-way between the church and the street.
Watkins replied this was dedicated right-of-way.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor Pro Tom closed the public hearing.
Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner, reported that 4 reply
forms had been mailed with 2 returned in favor and 0 in opposition.
This was a moderate activity center and was recommended for diverse
land uses. This petition included multi-family and commercial. The
43 units of multi-family was far below the acceptable density. The
parcel was within the established horizontal zone of the Denton
Municipal Airport and as such had conditions attached to the planned
development..
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the petition.
Council Member Stephens asked if the conditions which the neighbors
had requested in the reply forms had been attached.
Persaud replied that these requests for conditions had been
responded to by the Planning and Zoning Commission and as many as
feasible had been considered.
Motion carried unanimously.
H. the Council held a public hearing on the petition
David Spalding, representing Real-Tech, requesting a change in
zoning from the single family (SF-10) district to the planned
development (PD) classification on a 19.8 acre tract in the R.
Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31. The property was located on the east
side of Hickle Drive approximately 800 feet north of University
Drive (U.S. Highway 380). If approved, the planned development
wuuld permit the development of a retirement campus with the
following land uses
Single Family Attached - 67 units on 9.5 acres with a
density of 7 units per acre
Multi-Family - 183 units on 5.7 acres with a density
of 32 units per acre
Health Care Facility - 60 tad facility on 1.3 acres Z-1724
The Mayor Pro Tam opened the public hearing.
Mr. Dave Spalding, representing the petitioner, spoke in favor
stating that the proposed development was located north of Denton
Center, south of Hood Samaritan Village, west of the fairgrounds and
east of a residential subdivision. He had not with staff and with
individuals from the adjoining neighborhood. Real-Tech was
proposing a retirement campus type development. This site had many
amenities, such as trees, and proximity to a bank and Good Samaritan
Village.
Mr. Larry Good, architect, spoke in favor and presented slides of
other retirement campus developments with which his firm had been
associated. Most of the residents of these retirement campuses were
between the also of 65 and 85, The development would have a central
dining coos and activity center.
~~r a 'a n ey r s T,; § V ?i} i, l ♦i,a i✓ s to t s r O
r. Sd h "src t µ 1Ii 1
s i ry e~ s, 1 as r a i}.V
City ,Couneil Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Thirteen
Mr. Chrles Starnes, engineer, spoke in f%vor of the petition stating
that a hydraulic study had been performed. A portion of the
property was. in the flood plaint however, channelieation a,md
retention ponds would alleviate the problem. There was no- pcoble'ms
with utilities. A market study had been completed regarding the
traffic and no problems were anticipated.
Council Member Stephens asked if the petitioner had tried to work
out to have a street outlet to Carroll Boulevard north of the
fairgrounds.
Starnes responded that this had been discussed with the staff and
was given some consideration. This could bo handled during the
platting process. His firm would perfer not to do this due to
security concerns. They would like to have only 1 access in and out.
Council Member Riddlesperger complimented the petitioner on the
proposed development plan.
No one spoke in opposit0n.
The Mayor Pro rem closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that this
planned development was for a retirement center and the density and
intensity would not be violated. The potential drainage problems
had been addressed and the petitioners had met with the neighbors.
The proposal was consistent with the Denton Development Guide.
There had been 17 reply forms mailed with l roturne3 in favor and 0
returned in opposition. The Planning and Zoning Commission had
recommended approval.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the petition. Motion
carried unanimously.
1. The Council held a public hearing to consider an
ordinance amending Article 26 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Cole of
ordinances of the City of Denton to provide for referral and review
of the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation to deny a
request for a change in zoning to the City Council.
The Mayor Pro rem o0ened the public hearing.
Jeff Mayer, Director of Planning and Community Development, spoke in
favor stating that this ordinance would make official what had been
practiced for a long time. Any denial by the P&Z must be app2ated
to the City council within 10 days.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor Pro rem closed the public hearing.
L. The Council considered adoption cf an ordinance
amending Article 26 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Denton.
The following ordinance was presenteds
N0. 85-32
AN ORDINANCE AMSNDING ARTICLE 26 OF APPENDIX B-ZONINO OF
rH3 COD& OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF D8NTON TO PROVIDE FOR
REFSRRA[. AND R8VI3W OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION'S
RSCOKNUNDATION 'rO DENY A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING TO
rH$ CITY COUNCIL ONLY UPON THE TIMELY REQUEST OF THE
APPLICANTi AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFdCTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On coil call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens 'aye,' Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye,' Lard Mayor Pro rem Chow "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
'.'°`Fl r reV x J^, .v 1 r~ e i *i• r `.ti 9a~•,l' ~ :10 ~ 1
City council minutes
Meeting of February 19, 198S
Page Fourteen
J. The Council held a public hearing to consider in
ordinance repealing Article 10 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Cole 'of
Ordinances of the City of Denton; enacting a new Article 10 to
provide for the issuance of specific use permits:. providing for a
penalty in the maximum amount of $1,000 for violation thereoft
providing for a severability clause, and providing for an effective
date.
The Mayo: Pro rem opened the public hearing.
Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, spoke to
favor stattny that the ordinance wouli be an improvement to the
existing legislation as it provided a better criteria. A request
for a specific use permit would expire within 1 year. All in
violation would pay a penalty.
Mr. Burch spoke to opposition stating that he believed the $1,000
should not be charges in existing violations and that they should be
"grandfathered" tn.
The Mayor Pro Tea closed the public hearing.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
repealing Article 10 of Appendix H-Zoning of the Code of ordinances
of the City of Denton and enacting a new krticle 10.
The following ordinance was presented;
NO. 85-33
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE 10 OF APPENDIX S-ZONINO OF
THE COD? OF ORDINANCES; ENACTING A NEW ARTICLE 10 TO
PROVID8 FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIFIC USE PERMITS; PROVIDING
FOR A PENAWY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1000 FOR VIOLArION
rHERZOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUS?; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Stephens second to aiopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye." Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
A. The Council held a public hearing to consider an
ordinance amending Article 12 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Cole of
Ordinances of the City of Denton to provide for an amended
definition of "kindergarten or ;lursery;" declaring all existing
kindserygar;.en or nursery facilities Jegal uses; and providing for an
effective date.
The Mayor Pro rem opened the public hearing.
Jeff Mayer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported
that the Planning and Zoning Commission hal unanimously approved the
ordinance which was based upon a previous action of the Council in
an effort to straighten out the problem with day care centers, if
an existing day care center followed state regulations, they would
be legal; if they 114E eot adhere to state regulations, they
technically were not day care centers.
Council Member Hopkins asked if persons who kept children in thate
homes were legal day care centers.
Meyers responded the existing ordinance stated that S or more
chilJren being kept by a non-parent constttuted a day care canter.
Council Member Hopkins stated that he knew of some citicans who kept
10 to 1S children in their home.
.,k5 r" + 7 C r Ef '.t 7yIC ^P , +,^r+ T11 r r i f 1° vl\'. p r
City Council minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Fifteen
Meyer responded that he suspected that these people would be An
violation of, the state regulationsr however, the staff's only
interest was that of land use.
No one spoke in opposition.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Article 12 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Denton.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. L5-34
AN ORDINANCE AMANDINO ARTICLE 12 OF APPENDIX B-ZONING OF
THS COD] OF ORDINANCdS rO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDdD DBFINIrION
OF ".AINDdRGARTdN OR NURSERY," DECLARING ALL EXISTING
RINDdkGARrei OR NURSERY FACILITItS LdGAL USdS: AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECrIVF. DArd.
McAdams motion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
10. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinanco
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of cone rr._ts
for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or At.ervicesr
providing for the expenditure of funds thereforer and providing for
an effective date.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-35
AN ORDINANCE ACCdPrING COMPdTIrIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASd OF MATERIALS, EOUIPM84T, SUPPLIES
OR SdRVICES, PROVIDING FOR THE 904NDiru m OF FUNDS
THEREFOREr AND PROVIDING FOR AN eFFECrIV& DAre.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adapt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlespergor "aye," and Mayor Pro rem Chew "aye," Motion
carried unanimously.
B. The Cooncit considers,] adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
for public works or improvementsr providing for the expenditure of
funds thereforer and providing for an effective date.
'rho following ordinance was presented,
NO, 85-3b
Al ORDINANCE ACCdPTING COMPartfIVE BIOS AND PROVIDING FOR
THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORAS OR IMPROVEMENTS:
s PROVIDING FOR THE EXPdNDITURE OF K NDS rHERSFOR: AND
PROVIDINO FOR AN 9FFECfIVd DATE.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperjor "aye," end Mayor Pro rem Chew "aye, Motion carried
unanimously,
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Sixteen
C. ;rho Council considered adoption of an ordinance
providing for, the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases Hof
materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the
provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements
bf competitive btdsi and providing for an effective date.
! The following ordinance was presentedr
NO. 85-37
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THd EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
3MERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, Ea3UIPmzar, SUPPLIES OR
SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE wtrti rde PROVISIONS OF STATE LAN
EXEMPrING SUCH PURCHASES FROM RyQUIREMENTS nF COMPdrICIVE
BIDSr AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECrIV.' DATd,
McAdam3 motion, Hopkins second to aiopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro :em Chew "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
D. the Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a proposed pro rata and oversize a3reement with Greenway
Plaza (Tony Raposa, owner and/or his assigns) for a new 12" water
line from Thunderbird Street south alon3 IH-3S service road to
University Drive approxistely 1900 feet to connect to the existing
12" water line on the south side of University Drive.
Rob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this was as routine
oversizing for a development north of IH-35 and University,
The following ordinance was presentelt
NO, 85-38
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONrRACr FOR rH6 CITY'S
PAR'rICIPArION IN THE COST OF INSTALLING OVERSIZE WATERLINE
FACILITIESt AUTHOR22tNG ra MAYOR r0 eucurd ru CONTRACrt
APPROVING THd EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS rHEREFORE, A.4D PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFdCrIVd DATE.
Hopkins motion, Mckdarr.s second to adopt the ordinance.
Council Member Stephens stated that several property owners were
between the existing and extended water line. He then ssked if the
development would have a street which wouli connect to Payne to give
an access out of Greenway in addition to the one to the IH-35
service road.
Nelson responied that Rick Svehla woul3 have to reaponi to that
question.
Council Member Hopkins stated that he wouli like to see an addition
access road back into the Greenway addition.
On roll call vote, McAdams "aye " 11opkl,is "aye," Stephens "aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye, Mayor pro rem Chew "aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of sn ordinance
approving participation in a water shed environmental assessment
study with the North Central Texas Council of Governments and six
mettopiex utilities.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reporting that the city was
working actively with the North Central texas Council of Governments
in assessing and analysing any pollition problems in area leakes.
The City had already done some research in this area but this study
would be much more in-depth.
~ A r~ n. , s.. „z ~~a V 5>s"c a° is'P e ; i ~.r
r
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February l9, 1985
Page Seventeen
rho following.ordinance was presenteds ►
NO. 85-39 '
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DEN'TON, TEXAS, APPROVING AN
AGRdFM&NT FOR THE CITY'S PARrICIPArION IN A NORTH CENTRAL
TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT'S (NCTCOG) RESERVOIR WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO 4xacu d ras AGREEMSNTt
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFdCrIVE DATE.
Riddlesperger motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Chew "aye. Motion
carried unanimously.
F. the Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Appendix At Article Ill, Section 4.09, extensions of water
and sewer mains, sub-section 0, service from existing substandard
size lines.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this amendment to
the existing ordinance dealt with substandard water line. In the
case where a water line was substandard, the current policy was not
to allow people to tie on. With commercial development, the next
larger site line was required. to be used and extended across the
frontage of the property. Individuals have been allow to tie on to
substandard lines. This amendment states that a person requesting
approval of a development (if the lot was within 300 feet of an
existing fire hydrant) where an existing water line was determined
to be substandard, could pay to the city a pro rata charge in an
amount that would have been charged for tappingg a water line of
sufficient capacity in Lieu of installing an ad3ltional water line.
Upon approval of the development and the payment of the pro rata
charges and other applicable tapping„ etc. charges, the person could
then connecting to the existing substandard water line.
The following ordinance was presentedt
N0. 85-40
AN ORDINANCd AMdNDlNG APPAdDIX A (DdNrON DEVELOPMENT CODE)
OF rHE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF rHE CITY OF DEYrON TO PROVIDE
FOR PAYMENT OF PRO RATA CHARGES IN LIEU OF INSTALLATION OF
M QUIRED WATER LINdS TO S3RVd SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT
DdVELOPMENrSt AND PROVIDING FOR AN srucrive DAr3.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford 'aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Chew "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
calling a street bond election for the City of Denton to be held
March 23, 1985.
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, reported that the ordinance was
presented in the agenda back-up material and would call the election
of March 23. The election would be for 010 million for street
improvements for those street which were ranked as priority 1
streets by the bond committee.
The following ordinance was presented;
NO, 85-41
ORDINANCE CALLING A BOND ELECTION
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February L9, 1985
Page Eighteen
Stephens motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
H. rho Council considered adoption of an ordinance
calling and ordering an election for the City of Denton for the
purpose of electing four Councilpersons for Places 1, 2, 3 and 4 to
be held on April 6, 1985.
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 85-42
Ad ORDINANC9 CALLING AND ORDdRING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD IN
THd CITY OF DdNrON, rems, ON APRIL 6, 1985, FOR THE
PURPOS3 OF 3LECrING FOUR COUNCILPERSONS 'TO 'THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF D49rON, TEXAS FOR PLACES 1, 2, 3 AND 4;
ORDdRING TRAC rhd PUNCH CARD dLECTRONIC VOrING SYSr3M
ADOPTED BY 08NTON COUNTY BE USED IN SAID ELECrION1
PROVIDING FOR VOTING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION
OFFLCIALS AND PROVIDING FOR ELECTION SUPPLIES.
McAdams motion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
Council Member Alford left the meeting.
I. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a contract
between the City of Denton and Charles Willis and Associates.
Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported
that approximately two month earlier, the Council had tentatively
chosen Willis and Associates to prepare the master plan for the
Denton Municipal Airport. The grant award had basn received from
the FAA and sta`_f was now asking to formally approve the contract.
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 85-43
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THd CITY OF
Ddwro4 AND CHARLdS WILLIS i ASSOCIATdS, INC., FOR
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SdRVICES RI-GARDING AN AIRPORT
MASrdR PLANNING STUDYI AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THs
CONTRACT) APPROVING THE dXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THeREFOREt AND
PROVIDING FOR AN dFFECrIVd DArd.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "ate," Alford "aye,"
Riidlesperger "aye," Mayor Pro Tom Chew "aye. Motion carried
unanimously.
J. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
&sealing and reenacting in its entirety Article III of Chapter 1S of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton establishing a Police
Reserve Forcer providing for manner of appointment, minimum
qualifications and status of Police Reserve Officers) repealing all
ordinances in conflict l.erewith) and declaring an effective date.
Council Member Alford joined the meeting.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that the present ordinance was
out of date and did not comply with state statues. Chief Lynch and
Police staff had worked with the legal department to amend the
existing ordinance t,j bring it into compliance,
r
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Nineteen
The following ordinance was presenteds
,
N0. 85-44
AS ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY
ARTICLE Iii OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A POLICE RESERVE F0RC8;
PROVIDING FOR MANNER OF APPOINTMENT, MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
AND STATUS OF POLICE Rd SERVE OFFICERS; REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
McAdams motion, Stephans second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlespsrger "aye," and Mayor Pro rem Chew "aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
11. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
approving the submission of an application to the Texas Criminal
Justice Division requesting funding for a Juvenile Police Officer.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this was a continuation of
an existing grant.
The following resolution was presented;
R 8 S 0 L U T I 0 N
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council o-: the city of
Denton to authorize the submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for a Juvenile Police
officer to augment the City's Juvenile Law Enforcement Program; and
WHEREAS, Article 4413 (32a), V.T.C.S. was amended to enable
the Criminal Justice Division of the state of Texas to allocate
grants and administer criminal justice programs on a statewide
level; and
WHBREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such
funds and desires to promote the public safety and well-being of its
citizens through increasing the effectiveness of the Denton' Police
Department in its law enforcement relating to juveniles;
NOW THEREFORE, BE Ir RESOLVED BY THR COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
rEXASe
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
certifies that the City is eligible to receive a funding allocation
from the Texas Criminal Justice Division for a Juvenile Police
officer to augment the City's Juvenile Law Enforcement Program and
hereby authorizes the staff to submit an application for such funds.
SECTION II.
That the City Council ',preby authorizes and directs the
City Manager, or his designee, to represent and act on behalf o" the
City of Denton in working with the Criminal Justice Diviv an in
regard to such grant application.
SECTION III,
that a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the
Texas Criminal Justice Division and the North Texas Central Council
of Governments,
wl~ J ;,y ~t r y,- "i d r~r r 3' i a' in y t x .y r+ ~ 5 4n kLr'1
wy fan t y 6y p ^n,r,
r S r:
City Council' Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Twenty
P1SS$D AND APPROVED this the 19th day of February, 1983.
,
ATUHARD 0. , M
CITY OF DeRrON, TEXAS
ATT85r:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRSrARY
CITY OF OSNTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATrORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
McAdams motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved. on
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins 'aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
B. the Council considered approval of a resolution
approving the submission of an application to the Texas Criminal
Justice Division requesting funding for the city's Crime Prevention
Program.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this also was a
continuation of an existing grant.
The following resolution was presented:
R d S 0 L U r I 0 N
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council of the City of
Denton to authorize the submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for the City's Crime
Prevention Program: and
WHEREAS, Article 4413 (32a), V.T.C.S. was amended to enable
the Criminal Justict Division of the State of Texas to allocate
grants and administer criminal justice programs on a statewide
levelr and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such
funds and desires to protect the safety and well-being of its
citizens through the reduction of crimot NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT FU SOLVED BY rHE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON# rSXhS:
SECTION T,
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
certifies that the City is eligible to receive a fuming allocation
from the Texas C:i3inal Justice Division for the City'a crime
Prevention Program and hereby authorises the staff to submit an
application for such funds,
SECTION 11.
Thr,t the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the
City Manager, or his designs, to represent and act on behalf of the
City of Denton in working with the Criminal Justice Division in
rejard to such grant application.
t i~ rr~ `J~~"F t} u, 'y v i> `i t C: i j , .r r - Luc ! 1 +kt x i
/h ti Y R. r S l S'V
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Twenty-Ons
SBCl'Y.ON III.
, e
That a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the
Texas Criminal Justice Division and the North Texas Central Council
of Governments.
PASSED A.YO APPROVED this the 19th day of February, 1985.
RICHARD O. SrawARr, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, rexAS
Ar'TESTr
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DeSTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
By3
Stephens motion, McAdams secorvt that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye,' Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aje," Alford
"aye," Riddlespergec "aye," Mayor Pro Tom Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
C. rho Council considered approval of a resolution to
amend the Fox-51 lease at the Denton Municipal Airport.
Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported
that on January 15 the Council had approved an amendment to the
Pox-51 lease at the airport for additional hanyars. It had beer
found that a portion of the property to be used for the hangars '.ad
been covered in tho first Lease agreement. This resolutie., was
amend the first lease to include all of the property.
The following resolution was presentede
R E 8 0 L U T I 0 S
WHEREAS, tho City of Denton ler-as land upon the Denton
Municipal Airport to Fox-51 Limited by '.ase agreement latei July 1,
1980; and
WHEREAS, Fox-51 Limi~ad, acting by ani through its
President Mr. F. D. Strickle on January 15, L985, exercisel its
option to lease additional property on the Airport at three and
one-half cents per squaro foot per year for the purpose of building
an aircraft hangar and elated aircraft ramp; and
WHEREAS, '.ring subsequent planning ani development of that
hangar it was fo%ad that an additional 5,500 square feet of property
is required to decommodate the needs of Pox-SL Limits3r ani
W'.dRdAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
believer it to be in the interest of efficient Airport Operations to
lease dditional property to Fox-51 Limited;
''jW, THEREFORE BB IT RESOLVeD BY THE COUNCIL OF ru CITY OF
'.dNTON, TEXAS, rHATi
SECTION i.
The attached amendment to the airport Lease agreement of
July 1, 1980, between the City of Denton and Fox-Sl Limited is
hereby approved.
sM
. 1 Nl V~ ~~4 K. P ! R F
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February It L985
Page Twenty-Two
SECTT,ON tI.
the Mayor is hereby aut^.-3rired to execute the attached
amendment on behalf of the Cite and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to affix this Resolution, with the executed amendment
attached, to the origina? airport lease agreement dated July 1,
1980, inscribing on t-, original agreement the tact it has been
amended and the effoo.tve date of such amendment.
SECrT:a III.
the Resolution passed and approved on January 15, 1985
wni%'. amended the airport lease with Fox-51, Limited is hereby
-,scinded.
SECTION IV.
This Resolution ehall be effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of February, 1985.
RICHARD 0. SS W~u ART.-K-AVOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Ar'resr,
CHARLOTTE ALLeRj CITY 9-9CRErARY
CITY OF DEN'TON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY Arromg Y
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYl
Stephens motion, Riddlesperger second that the resolution be
approved. On roll 'call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens
"aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Mayor Pro Tom Chou "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered approval of a resolution
approving plans and specification for the Pox-Sl hangar.
Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported
that the staff had receivel and reviewed the plans and specification
for the Fox-51 hangars, The material was the same as the existing
hangars.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the engineering specifications had
been approved.
Angelo responded no. The approval of this resolution did not that
the plans would not have to go before the Building Official.
Council Member Hopkins stated that his concern was that the hangars
be structurally sound.
The following resolution was presentedi
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has leased land upon the Denton
Municipal Airport to Fox-51 Limbed by lease agreement dated July 1,
19801 and
.
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 19SS
Page Twenty-Three
WHERAM Pox-51 Limited desires to construct a 100 X 112
foot aircraft,hangar a,nl related office, storage and ramp facilities
upon the leased premisesr and
WHEREAS, the lease agreement provides that the plans and
specifications and the location of the improvements, the estimated
cost of such construction, and the agreed estimated life of such
structure be approved by the City Council of the City of Denton
before any such construction may commencer and
WHEREAS, the plans and specifications, the location and the
estimated cost and life of such construction have been reviewed by
the appropriate offices of the City staff and the Airport A-Ivisory
Board and found to be in compliance with applicable City Ordinances
and policies; Now, rHERd?ORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF Tre, CITY OF D&ArON, 'TEXAS, rNArs
SdCrION I.
The plans and specifications for the proposed constructions
if an airpM,rt h3ngar and related office, storage and ramp facilities
by Fox-5l Limited, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
refere,ice, at the location shown thereon, are hereby approved.
58CTION it,
The estimated cost of such construction of 160,330.30 and
the estimated life of the proposed structure of thirty (30) years is
hereby approved.
SECTION ITT.
fhIs- Resolution shall be effective immeAlately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of February, 1985.
$~y. R~iS~FTMTA~,l~A1'OR
c1r Y OF DCNrON, TEXAS
ACUSN
CHARLOTTE ALLE±I,C _r? SECRd PARY
CITY OF OEN;ON, U XAS
APPROVED AS rO LEOAL FORMNr
JOE D. MORRIS, ACrINO CITY Arro msY
,:IrY OF DENrON, reXAS
Bye
McAdams notion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alfotd
"aye," Riddlesper'ger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
9. rho Council considered approval of a resolution
authorizing members of the City of Denton Police Reserve Force.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this resolution was to be
approval in conjunction with the ordinance prevloualy considerel.
rho members of the Police Reserve Force must be approved by
resolution.
Council Member Stephens asked what type of training the reserve
received.
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, 1985
Page Twenty-Four
Lt. Paul Carbqrry responded that the reserves must qualify the sApe
as other officers including qualification with tireapons. `
The following resolution was presentedr
R E S 0 L U r 1 0 N
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, by
Ordinance No. 85-44, has created and established a Police Reserve
Force pursuant to Article 998a., V.r.C,S; and
WHEREAS, Article 998a., V.T.C,S., requires that the City
Council approve persons appointed to the Police Reserve Force before
those persons may carry a weapon or otherwise act as a peace
officers and
WHERdAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best
interests of the public safety and security of the citizens of
Denton to authorize members of the Police Reserve Force to exercise
the full authority allowed by statute) NOW, THEREFORE,
BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAri
Section 1.
The following members of the Police Reserve Force are
hereby approvodr
Pam Allen Kerry Jones
Mike Barrow Dana Kaisner
Art Behrens Chuck :Cull
Linda Cagle John Lassiter
Alice Gore Shirley Joan Lawson
Louts Heath Robert Lockett
Brian Joseph Horn Ivey Price
Ronald H. Hull Shop Scogin
Mike Hupp
Section It.
The members of the Police Reserve Force approved in Section
I hereof may carry weapons only when authorized by the Chief of
Police and when discharging official duties as duly constituted
peace officers.
Section 111.
This Resolution shall be effective immeiiately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSdO AND APPROVED this the 19th day of February, 1985.
RICHARD 0. S'Td'AR , MA OR r
CITY OF omON, TEXAS
ArrESr s
CFARLOTrd ALLEN, CITY SdCRdTAR1?
CITY OF D99TON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FO'Wi
ROBERT Be HUNTER
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
: sn i. ' r., nr. S . ui"... r~C l ~id
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 19, L985
Page Twenty-Five
Stephens motion, McAdams second that the resolution be approved. Gn
roll call vott, McAdams "aye,` Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Pro Tam Chew "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
12. The Council considered revisions to the FY 85 Capital
Improvements Plans (Utility Department).
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that as the year
progressed, staff reviewed the Capital Improvements Plan with an eye
to priorities and schedules. In FY 84 certain projects had been
programme] in but could not be accomplished as bonds had not been
sold. Several of these project would be moved forward this year.
The revised CIP called for the sewer lines on Eagle Drive, Carroll
Boulevard and Locust Street. Approximately 9250,000 less than
projected would be expanded this year than had been programmed in.
This would help tho profit picture at the end of the year.
McAdams motion, A.Lford second to approve the revisions to the FY 85
CIP. Motion carried unanimously.
13. The Council was to consider authorizing the use of
explosives for blasting at the new landfill site.
This item was removed from the agenda by staff.
14. There was no official action on dxscutive Session items of
legal matters, real estates personnel, or board appointments.
15. The following items of new business were suggested by
Council Members for future agandase
1. Council Member Riddlesperger asked that documents be
prepared to be sent to the State legislature opposing the proposed
legislation requiring publication of notice of intention to annex
property.
2. Council Member Stephens asked staff to prepare a proposal
to establish a corridor for the southern extension of :,oop 288.
3. Council Member Stephens asked for a report on cost
estimates for new sidewalks and repairs to existing sidewalks for
the Carroll Boulevard, Eagle Drive and Highland Street area.
4. Council Member Hopkins asked for a report of the impact on
the City of Denton by loss of federal revenues.
5. Council Member Hopkins asked that a meeting be arranged
with the Flow Hospital Board of Directors to look at the situation
with Flow.
6. Council Member Hopkins asked for a report in the near
future regarding the Parks and Recreation master plan.
RI HARD 0. STSWARr, MAYOR
cRARLOrTa ALEN, CITY SECRSrARY
1674C
,
City Council Minutes
February 26, 1985
The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at 5:30 p.m. In
the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Teo Chew; Council Members
Hopkins, MCAda+s, Riddlesperger and Stephens
Assistant City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City
Secretary
ABSENT: Council Member Alford was out of town on business
1. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing to consider the
adoption of an ordinance, establishing four single member districts.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, urban Planner, reported that the information on the
four districts had been recreated from the 1980 census and all
annexations since 1982 had been added. In the District 4 there had
been on increase in the minority break-down of the population;
however, this had been the only significant change.
Mayor Pro Tea Chew asked what was the formula used to arrive the the
percentages.
Carson responded th,j breakdown was taken from the 1980 census. The
block divisions of the census tracts were the combined percentages
of the minority breakdown by districts.
Mayor Stewart stated that there was an increase in the population in
District 1.
Carson responded there were tncresses in two census tract areas.
Mayor Stewart stated that there was an increase in population of 335
In District I.
Carson replied that annexations had been added to the previous
census tract information.
Council Member Stephens stated that the new information did include
all annexation from 1982. The original census had considered a
certain vacancy rate for apartments and asked if staff had
considered a lower vacancy rate in these calculations.
Carson responded that staff was legally required to work from census
information only.
Mayor Stewart stated that it was possible to petition the Census
Bureau at mid-term for new data and asked if that had been
considered.
Carson responded that it had been considered but staff was working
under a time deadline to subsit the revised information to the
Justice Department prior to the April elections.
2. Ordinances
The following ordinance was presented,
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 26, 198S
Page Two
NO. 9S-45
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND DESCRIBING FOUR SINGLE ME24BER•
ELECTION DISTRICTS IN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS;
DETERMINING THE POPULATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON AND OF
EACH SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE FROM AND AFTER THE DATE OF
PASSAGE OF THIS ORDINANCE.
Riddlesperger notion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unant.e!ously.
3. Resolutions
A. The Council considertd appproval of a resolution
approving an Airport Lease Agreement with Mr. Benjamin Bennitt.
Clint Lynch, Airport Manager, distributed an attachment to the
proposed lease agreement. Lynch reported that the area in question
was approximately 11 acres oc property south of the FAA ramp and the
lease would be for a fu.11 Fixed Base Operator facility. The
agreement was the standar%i 20 year lease with four 5 year extensions
j provided. Cost of the 1'.aase would be 3 1121 per square foot per
year. Also the lessee would pay to the City 101 of all hangar and
tie-down rental fees and a $t fuel flow fee.
bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported
that there would be some costs incurred by the city. An entrance
road would have to be constructe(4 as well as the extension of a
water line. The total cost would be approximately $47,000. These
two improvements would also serve i pprox mately 29 acres surrounding
the lease property. With 2 FBOs at the airport, the city could
assume control of the Unicom. This would mean an additional staff
member. The payback of all costs for improvements would take
approximately 3.6 years.
Council Member Stephens asked where the water line would come from.
Angelo responded that there was a 12" water tine on Airport road.
Council Member Stephens asked regarding the cost stating that it
initially was very expensive.
Clint Lynch responded that the line would be extended 1400 feet.
Cost figures had been obtained from the Water Department and
included the line and hydrants.
Council Member Stephens asked if the construction would be done by
City crews or contracted.
Angelo responded the work vould probably be contracted out.
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that the design work
would be done in-house.
Lynch presented a map of the prospectiii lease proprty and water
lines.
Council Member Hopkins asked what sire the water line would be.
Lynch responded all.
Council Member Stephens asked if this would accommodate future
growth.
Lynch responded yes.
I
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 16, 1985
Psge Three
Angelo reported that the area could be served from t'..e water main on,`
Airport Road but in order to meet City codes regarding fire safety
requirements, staff was asking for an 8' line.
Mr. Benjamin Bennitt and Mr. Gerald Smith were recognized.
Mr. Bennitt stated that he was happy to have an opportunity to
provide this service to the community.
Mayor Stewart asked if Mr. Bennitt was to oe a Piper aircraft
representative.
Mr. Bennitt responded that the Pippeer organization had factory direct
sales And representative sales. He had good rapport with the Brown
Piper organization in San Antonio who were distributors and 'ir.
Brown was looking forward to having representation in Denton.
Council Member Stephens asked if the Airport Advisory Board had met
and approved this lease.
Angelo responded the Airport Advisory Board had met and had voted
unanimously to recommend approval of the lease.
The following resolution was approved:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the City of Denton owns property available for
lease at the Denton Municipal Airport; and
WHEREAS, Benjamin A. Bennitt, doing business
as , desires to lease property at the
Denton Municipal Airport en to use the some for a fixed base
operation; and
WHEREAS, fixed base operation services are essential to the
proper accommodation of general and commercial aviation at the
Airport; and
WHEREAS, the Airport Advisory Board has reviewed and
recommended approval of the attached proposed lease agreement; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
I
The Airport Lease A reement (Fixed Base Operator) betceen
the City of Denton and BenN ain A. Bennitt, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved.
r
SECTION ll.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the attached
lease agreement on behalf of the City.
4SECTION III.
T.nis Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 26th day of February, 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
j N a C' 1•.. 4. ' .a
e
t
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 26, 1985
Page Four
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,lTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOB D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
8 Y:
McAdams notion, Chew second to approve the resolution. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Riddlesperger
"aye," Cnew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
le al natters, real estate, personiel and board appointments. No
of iclai action was taken.
With no further items of business, the r-r ting was adjourned.
KIM ,
LKARLULLE ALLEN, CITY 51KIthfART
1675C
DATE: 03/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Plats and Replats
RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee and the Planning
and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the
following plats and replats:
1. Preliminary Plat of Creekside Addition
2. Preliminary Plat of Kelsoe-Pitner Addition '
3. Preliminary and Final Replat of John A. Hann`s
Addition, Block 2, Lot 4-R1.
SUMMARY:
BACKGROUND:
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable
Respegpfu y a m ted:
r a ar ung
City Manager
Prepared nnby:
Cecile Carson
Urban Plani.er
App v
e eyw
Director of Planning
and Cor;aunity Development
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of Creekside
Addition
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 3.4745 acres situated south
of and abutting US Hwy 380 and west of Loop
288. The tract is more fully described as Lot
1, Block 1, Creekside Addition, and shown on the
R. B. Longbottom Survey, Abstract 775, City of
Denton. The site is zoned commercial, and a
mini-warehouse development is anticipated.
Water, sanitary sewer, electric, telephone, and
solid waste disposal services and facilities are
adequate and available.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat of the
Creekside Addition.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
0721j(3)
CDYYLaG,AA tD~
Of•~• eY STATE Of TEXAS u
• Qt
calvtl or xrtol L
r R / P79453 "taw. I. Ab•D MCI , w T1t claim of A 1.Nd kL Text
w 4•, r~ cot • Ti s4f 34R€. U. la Au / o tcle wren arnvn, wTUCT ln. cIn ue osom or
a
caa
599.17 S. Nw "l •WK11::10 11 A RID 1 w %16&? V Ta ATIV4. Ft WE i0~
_ IOp• Y _ ICYRIIna 0 rN It" DA1 Ar uniopLl! Jett. 111C94013 It 1Ay111
tRg1 '►as 380 a ,Y M. PaCk 6„1 It IAIA C1171 ANE LIK r[w MILT
4r t MV ufu .
" _ Ittlvlt AT A IKYi•41-ale to NaLl lit IN Ttt ON t1l MVMMM
unl Of t t atcau SN. 114116 At 1"a GlAttooIR l1►`I u►
a.ra fltli Tel 1ctt44A1T uua O/ 01 I" am OanIm a 1.M ANL
TLX1I
• , / / C 0~*~l4lCa`t/R1a~ r .rGllal M WNpCCSYtt+a11NINQUI 0 YCOMM, a /a01YS N 1• 1
J - Y 1 + L Mt1 OA lift. All A1c als-AA1 Of M.U rut. as 116'{0 a Rti M
O6uu a ■uH/ '1 alCokm tut. 14.0 ruT to u 1 9. a,
At r r M7R:1 1RNt1 w ►9. LLIl 6. N1.1:U :J fl.,.l7t YLlt t ►.YUCa »
7-_t--,~~ `L Yw
ntT m Ar Irt+ nn
• ' 0014000111, NAr.uR: rcr lrpwr it .1
ftwl wlh 1/ OK 17.t1 30 YIVTt/ 71 {Y:WY dt' t fR'601 01
} 144.11 flit IN, A$ k" rlA~7~/ \ n Tuxt mv%T1 as routs 14 wnr 41 ra q:/ or . s~'.rct at
l 4 fMT OY 1.tn 611.1? PCR m m KLII M malta RL m o*TA."K 1 .'a! Kul
! + 1!1 rR.IM RONt Or LINO.
•wD►rD rrr4
1• V, wv ru 147.14 n. rYlu RtR h Mua neural
\ r•YONI NaI•NRMf "RA" if
I in {1lT AOIM pt gat . lI Mlt lT IN "It .Nr AD +t I.
'II•1,
1AC 1 A r:Orl I. :r Mt CTtailA A001 %Itv MI CIT. OT it
910 L I aauIG'1 :U !N M1: 151 Ill h tn6~3 Y'1
l 1 lndu" rK aAwa 49111
QT_ I f
{ - ~ •~-ter ~ . i w'1 •
J ! r alAto ll MAN 1A
Z A, \$LOGK.- 1'~ ~ .~-~.\\'.;..~\~,C l~ Im T lr xbTVQ
MI111 11f1 war-=f Ct M4**
3.AIM 1 i Itruu me, the m4111,410 19T6A1 t.wiC IN A" Kau I .-.v!S
♦ t r _ 'COYYIat lL0~ AC 1♦. \ ♦ _ _ I- ` J 1 A" ItoN$it tuto r to 01 tees 161 re % AYR PN,Cl c w
3 s ■ w rlu0l 6"[ it I TA, o A t1al to 1 ha Nei1lr
_ _ ' LL' WI AYR L0sjp MI w RIrI ul s AN ttlt SID. ► Y cw 1]/
;
I._~ ~--1• u 111E M lla tttINAA1i~1f MEStI■ LLralESES 61M 1 T`1
! ]uK111 mull fATU1
f`" ai \ t \ \ j It
cl+t/ 01:0 III UAD Ar ltu If Crfl.l TI 34t :1
rlw/ts YJ dtNUr uR+.e+
....'.y.-.l 3
r _
- I a N
Z
1 fri:.: hja1 C' (d".4 red irai J"flitFifi
l N
M : 1 V g PLAVIUVA COTMCAR
c
O rayoln CAN n Iwatwaa tam MIS VAR IT Tttu 111110111
l1 ' Iyaa
• .
_ -`y ra0r01ID Rr Nd,YD 0 ;oa0rt i tut. 1. CAA o lmmrt. ucl/Mate flahill I NMt+7t IN
r11V , a• N a1&SA Culln fuT 1 rurADES WE hAt INK Y ftn-6 r
I -_7L- -L-.:..-~a~a..~~, ~t~i, M'C T•aa'raK ~M aceuuta 1CAn of 111E Luc, AA laaT tYl Ib1 Plot W" 'taltfc,7
i - _ _ _ RaOruD~D l0 MAuM CANaM T• it All Ito too a,N NEWS PLACES 61.11 ►t rN70RLL 101111/101 11 KC9aMia 61-20 tY
No& lsy 47Cy} `-a 1 OaTMAA11 Of TII Cs" Ot NaTIA.
RAW
MYr.
10
be tL lie were +.ri' ►l9e~to':e w - seen
11 7 3045 Ao116 the
11 ACtl11fy tromp D0110R01, FN Coy to CMMIt it Dole", Tt a' 71'-...
IIU 1 Lil for Catall7ttlfl WE ,rr- 14f. Ll1A / I :
AOa,nA1t•Ml IONt DrICto P"I "",/&Y 4}IIf. I✓•e O'D ,.•+n 1+ a..!
!h nNOalsT t,/;,Dja Rf//. 0.isf 0;. Pr- At
IN SAN ANTTA4 1% 111„
i.4td ad Ed Ad WAAAWjd
AL9
W41 i.
ors elt HARARASTy H ea CREEKSIDE ADDITION
PR-
CAN at CONlUMNf t%fINtEN! t OUNKY04f R. A, Lb,IOBCTTOM SURVEY A9 > Ts
DINIONA I aTt uml ar loauu JtKAA rim- a In CITY G LINTY IDENTON TEXAS
7 V~ t
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Kelsoe-
Pitner Addition
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.47 acres located at the
northeast cornet of Vine and Schmitz. The tract
is more fully described as Lot 1, Block 1 of
the Kelsoe-Pitner Addition and shown in the
BBB & CRR Co. Survey, Abstract 185, City of
Denton. The property is zoned multi-family
(MF-1) and multi-family development is
anticipated.
Water, sanitary sewer, electric, telephone, and
solid waste disposal services and facilities are
adequate and available.
ACTION kEQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat of the Kelsoe-
Pitner Addition.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
l.,l. CA G (~h.nf3,n.-
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
0721)(5)
i
WIN roe
. ~r
w:r
k wqf Kr _ arr
r.AL .d J sMVCAWtK.
~ T t t
I t ~
IP ~y1t~y SLOGfI I I avarice roe.%urw •
I t
FfkrUld"ft MAT,
KELSOE-PItNM ADOMON
arb. .LOT,1, -6iOpC its
I wt err - - _ "'owi¢ia x~ ~~ctos . .
' 8 RKE MUMEERI NC. .
SINMifZ r ervw►wa t7 .f„M::
~ (MAN SYlf~u'e a• 1 !/nr/fit
10 go'w" I IS 1009
AbJ./.I ~w't~ ~ . .Ia 611rhSS
u
RECEIVE:' MAR I 14~4S
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary And final replat of
John A. Haan's Addition, Lot 4-R1, Block 2
SUMMAPY: This is a tract of 0.749 acres situated east of
Austin Street and south of Hann Street. The
tract is more fully described as Lot 4-R1,
Block 2 of the John A. Hann's Addition and
shown in the BBB & CRR Co. Survey, Abstract
185, City of Denton. The site is zoned
multi-family (MF-1) and multi-family
development is anticipated.
Water, sanitary sewer, electric, gas,
telephone, and solid waste services and
f&cilities are adequate and available.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary and final replat of
John A. Hann's Addition, Lot 4-R1, Block 2.
ALTEUNA'IIVES: Approval or denial of replat
ATTACH!{CNT: Reduced replat
tAfj- l1
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
071Ss
Aw
see wlf~'.p
~ lO.BT dd r h
A 11 ~ 1W~
I.tC s*ncctT ~ {
OCINt aTKM r~l YC u l n'~. r ~
0 1-
+ I l.,)T 4 - R ~ I.TIT ] i I. +
OLK z it
ff F ti + N 1. HANN ADON r
BLOT 4-RI N ~bISl,Pgs471 411 tit' *,II,
DIe6 RlcaEa
, eLOtlc x v1av,T, VAP
9.000 At. N- _ 1" 12JCr
STREET 0.749 Ae. - r-
DEMATma
1- i MILLAFD THORP I WOOOSON
' 111 7721176
■
ru S E Tt -
TADS ACOTION
LOTS 15 2
BLOCK I
IUNRECOROt6)
.O sa' gtAEtT DCDIC atK7r
s UTILITY AMT.
~ 1
7.1
N W4 • 146.q
CARL ROHDE OMINER
Val *0 9.Pq 796 L -
STRATA PROPERTIES, INC.
PLAT OF
JOHN A. HANN'S ADDITION
LOT 4-RI, BLOCK 2
BEING A REPLAY OF LOT 4-R, BLK.
2+ JOHN A. HANN'S ADON, I. REC. IN
CAB. 0, 1116.66; P.R.O.C.T.
IS. B. b. AND C. R.R. CO. SURV£r A-164
CITY ANO C"TY Of DE MW, IIXA4
~r
4
T
0 20 40 93 10
GRAPHIC FEET
STRATA PROPERTIES
tS
fF y.. n{ ro "~Y rVs L r1t f.:4 A~ .,5q u efr
DATE: ' 3/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
UBJECT: Approval of Site Plan Revision for PD-22
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoninq Commission considered this item
at its meeting of February 27, 1995 and voted to recom-
mend approval of the site plan revision.
SUMMARY: This is a request for a site plan revision in planned
development (PD-22). This planned development created
John Knox Village/Lake Forest Village - a residential
retirement and nursing home facility.
BACKGROUND: The new owners wish to revise the approved site plan
for PD-22. The revision consists of interchanginq the
positions of the nursing home and the parking lot which
will allow apartment and nursing home residents to eat
in their respective dining rooms without going outdoors.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respectful y subm tted:
k ~
r s ar :un
City Manager
Prepared by:
'Denise Spivey
Urban Planner
Ap ov
Director of Planning
and Community Devalopment
F
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of site plan revision of PD-22
(John Knox/Lake Forest Village Retirement Center)
SUMMARY: Planned development (PD-22) permitted the devel-
opment of a retirement center with a nursing home
and hi-rise apartment residential facilities.
The property has now been acquired by Good
Samaritan Center who wishes to revise the site
plan for the planned development. The revision
consists of interchanging the nursing home With
the parking lot which will allow apartment resi-
dents and nursing home residents to eat in their
respective dining rooms without going outdoors.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of site plan revision
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the site plan revision.
ALTERNATIVE: Approve site plan
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced Site Plan
2. Letter
3. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes
of February 27, 1985
«
en se p ey'
Urban Planner
y~
nEw i~_ _
.
,
H
I [ f M Z. ,rr 'Y j'
.1 0
Architecture a Engineering a Energy Consultation a Surveying
Planning • Design *Construction management • Des1gnl8uiid
January 24, 1985
Ms. Denise Spivey
Development Review Planner
City of Denton
Municipal Buidling
215 E. McKinney
Denton, TX - 76201
RE: Lake Forest Good Samaritan Center
Denton, Texas
Project No. 8485
Ms. Spivey, enclosed are 15 copies of the revised Site Plan for the
referenced project.
The revision consists of interchanging the nursing home with the
parking lot.
The revision was necessary to allow the nursing home to be
physically attached to the hi-rise apartment. This will enable the
apartment residents and nursing home residents to eat in their
respective dining rooms (that are served by 1 kitchen) without
going outdoors.
Sincerely,
TSP~
W. S. Steele, AIA
WSS*mt, m8-j
Enclosure
cc; Mr. Mel Risting
f
Denver, Co
Duluth, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Rochester, MN
Rspld City, SD
Slouu Falls, SD
Olilelts, WY
Sheridan, WY 1112 West Avenue North, Sloux fans, South Dakota 51104 (1106) 3361180
P 6 Z Minutes
February 27p 1985
Page 10
2) 'c'hat Phase IIo consisting of a total of 225 units,
be routed to existing 12 sanitary sewer on North
Carroll south of development.
Seconded by Mr. Pearson and carried 6-1. (Mr. Sidor
-voted no.)
E.F Recommend approval of site plan revision of PO-22
(John Knox/Lake Forest Village Retirement Center).
Ms. Spivey explained the planned development permitted
the development of a retirement center with a nursing
home and high-rise apartment residential facilities.
She stated the property has now been acquired by Good
Samaritan Center who wishes to revise the site plan for
the planned development. She showed the revisions which
consist of interchanging the nursing home with the
parking lot which will allow apartment residents and
nursing home residents to eat in their respective dining
rooms without going outdoors. Staff recommends approval
of the site plan revision.
Mr. Escue made a motion to recommend approval of the
site plan revision for PD-22 (John Knox/ Lake Forest
Village Retirement Center. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and
unanimously carried (7-0).
Chair stated there is no new business.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 6:50 p.m.
°7.y.
j
UATfi: 3-19-85
CI`T'Y COUNCIL REPORT V0101AT
TO Mayor and Members of the city Cou"Cil
VROM C. Chris llartuug, City planager
SUBJ GC'C: BID #9417 SALE OF CITY OWNED EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY ON,
CARROLL BETWEEN PRAIRIE AND HIGHLAND.
RGC014b1614UATI01i: We recommend this bid be awarded to the highest bidder
on each of Tract A & B. Tract "A" to T.M. Stingley at
$1.65 per sq: ft. and Tract "B" to Charles Struthers @
$2.00 per sq. ft.
SUGH AR Y: This bid was sent to all known persons interested and
advertised properly. We received only three bids as
indicated on the tabulation sheet.
BACKGROUND Tabulation Sheet
I'RoGit riS, UCl'AR'rtIGH'i'S 0R CROUPS ACFGC' I).
None
rISCAL I1.1rAC'r: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Respectfully sub tied:
•
b": i;li la EUug
City !.tanager
Fr red by:
10-
e John J. Marshall. P.N
^le Purchasing Agent
Ap oved:
La
n J hn J. Marshall, C.P.M.
t ti Purchasing Agent
11D TITLE SALE OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY T.M. Dale Charles
OPENED FEbruary 2b, 1985 2 p.m. Stingley Erwin. Struthers
ACCOUNT i i
1
ITM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
Tract per S Ft. 1.25 1.79 ' 2.00
.,2 Tract 8 pAr sq. ft. -1A5 1.52
i
I
i
-1 J
TI~1 r . r s ,
' Ir~ F. 5
DAYS: 03/14/85
QITY coyiLg L REPORT PORl~AT
~t
T0: Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PETITION OF THE CITY OF DENTON
FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 136.588 ACRES 3EGINNING APPROXI-
MATELY 500 FEET EAST OF THE CENTER LINE OF US HWY 377 AND SOUTH OF
BRUSH CREEK ROAD (A-11)
RCCOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission made recommendation at its
meeting of March 13, 1985.
SUMMARY:
This is an involuntary annexation request for 172 acres called the
Woodcreek Subdivision, located along Brush Creek Road east of Hwy
377.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council directed staff to initiate the annexation process
on this tract at its meeting of July 3, 1984.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
All City departments and programs required to provide basic services
upon development.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Respectfully submitted:
e
®r AM
• G. Chris Har u
P pare by: City Manager
r
I
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App ve :
Jeff Key
Director of Planning
and Community Development
0736]
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATd : March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing regarding the petition of
the City of Denton for annexation of approxi-
mately 136.58 acres beginning approximately 500
feet east of the center line of US Hwy 377 and
south of Brushcreek Road. (A-11)
SUMMARY: On July 3, 1985, the Planning and Community
Development Department reporter, plans for
proposed 172 acre development consisting of
predominately single family housing, townhouses,
six acres of commercial, and approximately 3
acres of retail and multi-family. The site is
currently located in the extraterritorial
jurisdiction of the City of Denton and the Citi
Council directed staff to begin the annexation
process.
Due to delays in obtaining a proper legal
description, changes in staff responsibilities,
and questions concerning utilities service,
processing of the annexation petition has been
slower than usual. Electric service is
available from both the City of Denton and
TP&L. Water service must Le planned in con-
junction with the city of Argyle, because it too
is in a dual service area and extending City of
neuton mains is not a feasible alternative.
Sewer service in to be provided by th( ^.ity of
Denton.
The Development Review Committee has reviewed a
preliminary plat of the proposed development
(Woodcreek Subdivision) and has withheld a j
recommendation of approval pending comments and
acceptance of the Argyle Water Company for
requested sale of water. The south half of
Brush Creel. Road for a distance of approximately
1.625 feet is included in the proposed
annexation.
ACTION REQUIRED: No action is required to continue the annexation
procosse
City Counoil'Back-up
Page 2
PROGRAMS,
DEPARTMENTS, OR
GROUPS AFFECTED: Police, Fire, and Sanitation Departments will
have to provide immediate services upon
annexation for any existing housing or
population.
ATTACHMENTS: L. Annexation Map
2. Memorandum from Charles Watkins, Former
Senior Planner, to the Denton City Council
3. Annexation Schedule
N04 A7-~~ -
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0720s
E•A-11
it a
I~
I~
~l n
\ L
f
i -
r . r• i . r ..r r ~r~ . • r
f'Y
e
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 19, 1984
TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: Charles S. Watkins, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN THE
EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF
DETERMINING WHETHER TO BEGIN THE ANNEXATION PROCESS
Approximately 60 lots are proposed for development adjacent to
Vacation Village Mobile Home Park/Subdivision.. Land use is to
be manufactured housing on typical 5,000 square foot lots. The
existing Vacation Village is served by s own mater district
and the additional proposed development -.s also within this
water district.
It will not be possible to annex only the site proposed for ce-
velopment because the annexation statute requires that a city
cannot annex part of a water district but must annex all of a
water district located wholly within its extraterritorial ju-
risdiction.
A legal opinion has been requested to determine if a city is
required, to assume the assets and liabilities of the water dis-
trict if it is annexed into the city. Annexation of the water
district would also require running a 500 foot wide strip a
considerable distance (at least 1.5 miles) to get to the prop-
erty.
Mrs. Jo Storer is propucing a mixed use development on a tract
of land consisting of approximately 172 acres located along the
south side of Brush Creek Road and along the east side of U.S.
Highway 377. The land plan for the 172 acre tract consists of
6 to 9 acres of commercial or retail uses and approximately 40
to 50 lots for townhouse development backing up to U.S. Highway
7) 1~
.
G. Curie Hhrtung
June 19'. 1984
Page Two
377 with the remainder of the tract to be divided into approxi-
mately 1/2 acre single family lots. This particular site is
approximately 2 miles south of the urbanized area of the city
of Denton.
' i
ar es Wat ins
aq
0624a
f
e rF' s: '1 ~lopw •r °.v i•:Y '1 k f. ie r 3. e .
i A-11
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
Feb:uary 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*March 05, 1985 City Council sets date, time and
place for public hearing
March 06, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 120 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*March 19, 1985 City Council holds public hearing
March 20, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 07, 1985 City Council nolds public nearing
April :5, 1985 Submit agenda item
April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance
May 27, 1985 Submit agenda item
May 28, 1985 submit agenda back-up
. *June 04, 1985 Final action by City Council
*Denotes action by the City Council
0964g
DACgt 03/14165
.CITY COUNCIL UPORT FORMAT
TOt Mayor and Members of the G'_ty Council
31-08t
FROM-. G. Chris Hartung, City Maneger
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING THE PETITION OF THE CITY OF DENTON
FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 65.12 ACRES BEGINNING 350 FEET SOUTH OF
AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTER LINE OF US HWY 380 AND EAST OF GEESLING
ROAD (CAPRICORN MOBILE HOME PARK AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES A-13)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission made recommendation at its meeting
of March 13, 1985.
SUMMARY'.
The Holigan Development Corporation has informed staff of tentative
plans to improve and expand the existing Capricorn Mobile Home Park.
The existing portion of the Capricorn Mobile Home Park is comprised of
approximately 30 acres and 150 residents. Reported plans are to expand
the park by 63+ acres at 6 to 7 units per acre.
BACKGROUND:
A. prelivainary plat has been submitted for review and acceptance by the
Development Re%iew Committee, Planning and Zoning Commission, and City
Council. The request for annexation is involuntary, however, the
prospective owners/developers have indicated that the annexation is not
critical insofar as their plans are concerned.
,,PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
As stated above, there are approximately 1511 residents currently at
Capricorn Mobile Home Park. Projected population, if ultimate
development is approved as proposed, is 1,625.
Building Inspection, solid Waste, Police and Fire departments would be
requtred to provide immediate City services upon annexation. Other
City departments or programs such as the Libear, will also be impacted
upon annexation.
FISCAL IMPACT'.
Undetermined
Respectful1 submit'. d:
•
P epare by-.
0. Chr s Hartung
City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App Ye
Jeff Me
Director of Planning
and Community Development 0136)
qr. 'a. r y:r r~ Vr .v, .fir,, w •~r<'.r.' .
~f
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing concerninc, the petition of
the City of Denton for annexation of approxi-
mately 65.12 acres beginning ',50 feet south of
and perpendicular to the cen'.er line of US Hwy
380 and east of Geesling Ro•.d (Capricorn Mobile
Home Park and surrounding .,roperties) (A-13)
SUMMARY: The Holigan Development r.orporation has proposed
to expand and improve t►.e Capricorn Mobile Home
Park. The existing motile home park is situated
on approximately 30 arces, and an additional 63+
acres is proposed for mobile home land use at
approximately 6 to 7 units per acre.
Upgraded utility ee M ce to the existing mobile
hone park is a pot,ntial plus of the propc,:l.
Continuation of t?.e pattern of concentrating
manufactured/mobile home park land use in east
Denton is a majcc policy question. A strip of
the existing park and property located along the
Hwy 380 €ronta,~e is already in the city limits.
A preliminary plat of the area proposed for
expansion hae been submitted for review by the
Development Review Committee. The City Council
issued a directive to staff to initiate the
annexation process of the existing park and
proposed ',rea of expansion at its meeting of
December 18, 1984. The Planning and Zoning
Commissiin, Public Utilities Board, and City
Council approved a request for the extension
of Cite utilities to the site.
ACTION REQUIRED: No ac',ion is requited to continue the annexation
process
PROGRAMS,
DEPARTMENTS, OR
GROUPS AFFECTED: Th(re are approximately 150 residents at
Capricorn Mobile Home Park. Projected popu-
Uition, if ultimate development is approved
as proposed, is 1,625.
I
I
J
i'
City Council Back-up
Page 2
PROGRAMS,
DEPARTMENTS, OR
GROUPS AFFECTED
(Continued)% Building Inspection. Solid Waste, Police and Fire
would be required to provide immediate City ser-
vices upon annexation. Other City departments or
programs will also be impacted upon annexation.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annexation Map
2. Reduced Preliminary Plat
3. Annexation Schedule
CtA~ltd.'
David Ellison
Senior Planner
•
O7l9i(a)
+ r
Ar-13 .
I ~
L
0 now,
40
/ .11M ~ MY
TI
a
e f•
i
i
~I
i
~ Ea ~ E~ 4 Es E
14 -V%
~Yrr is ~ w °~r t ,y'X t !~'s i}1`2 o-' ••r 7 nl( pjl r J rc ..w N i 1'ti ~k R ~,~.,r -vf
r ~ .r
A-13
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 260 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*March 05, 1985 City Council sets date, time and
place for public hearing
March 06, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March It, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 121 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*March 19, 1985 City Council holds public hearing
March 20, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 26, 1965 Submit agenda back-up
*April 02, 1985 City Council holds public hearing
April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item
April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance
May 27, 1985 Submit agenda item
May 281 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*June C41 1985 Final action by City Council
i
*Denotes action by the City Council
09648
d 4 i r e e !'r r.v r r +a a r ♦",w.. s i . x; r. a t' r ~ 11 .
OktBi 03/14/83
loITY COUNCIL Upon FOStlU1T
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 34 i
FROM., 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PETITION OF R. 0. MCDONNELL FOR
ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 34.68 ACRES SITUATED IN THE M. FORRE3T
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 417 AND BROWNING APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET SOUTH OF
AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTER LINE OF FM 426 AND APPROXIMATELY
2.000 FEET EAST OF MAYHILL ROAD U-14)
RECOMMENDATIOKs
The Planning and Zoning Commission made recommendation at its
meeting of March 13, 1985.
Si t:
This is the site of a proposed development consisting predominately
two family land use with limited retail/warehousing land use along
the FM 426 frontage. A portion of the site is currently located
within the city limits.
BACKGROUND:
This is a voluntary annexation request and a change in toning pro-
posal was considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its
meeting of March 13, 1985 and February 27, 1985.
rRAMS, DEPARTMENTS R GROUPS AFFECTED,
Approximately 2 dwellins units and 5 residents currently reside at
the site. All City of Denton departments end programs providing
basic cervices such as Police, Vice, Solid Waste, and Library are
affected.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Respectfully submitt %
0. Chr a Har ung
Prepared by: City Kantger
~ 4" a&M
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Ap ove
Jeff e ,
Director of Planning
and Community Development
0736,E
9 t w
% ~ A hS~s 1 I 1~.Q1' l"., ikfi Yeti y }g
}l ~M~
Y f 1 1 iF } i yCITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Hold a put~lic hearing regarding the petition of
R. 0. McDjnnoll for annexation of approximately
34.6 acres of land situated in the M. Forrest
Survey, Abstract 417 and beginning approximately
250 feet south of and perpendiculan to the
center line of FM 426 and approximately 2,000
feet east of Mayhill. Road (A-14)
SUMMARY: This request is voluntary, and the purpose is to
control development and zoning.
ACTION REQUIRED: No action is required to continue the annexation
process
PROGRAMS ,
DEPARTMENTS, OR
GROUPS AFFECTED: All City of Denton departments providing basic
services such as Police, Fire, Solid Waste,
Library, etc. Approximately two dwelling units
and five residents reside at the site in
question.
ATTACHMENTS: I. Annexation Map
2. Annexation Schedule
a
av ilison
`+r
Senior Planner
0719J(3)
y
~ r
1
a' ~ f
i 1
Bla R a
i
I
Y i~t (V "P %1 v <yf s~ ^ 4 .
Y j
mot. C. ~ a
® A-14
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 261.1985 Submit agenda back-up
*14arch 051 1985 City Council sets date, time and
place for public hearing
March 061 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*March 19, 1985 city Council holds public hearing
March 20, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
. March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 02, 1985 City Council holds public hearing
April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item
April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 23, 1985 Special called meeting o~ City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance
May 27, 1985 Submit agenda item
May 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
• *June 04, 1985 Final action by City Council
*Denotes action by the City Council
0964g
n
DATds 0344/85
CITY COUNgIL UPORT FORMAT
Tot Mayor and Members of thx City Council "51
FROM, G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: MAKE A RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING THE PETITION OF THE CITY OF DENTON
FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 42.35 ACARS SITUATED IN THE S. HUIZAR
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 514 ANU BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF
AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTER LINE OF US HWY 380 AND WEST OF MASCH
BRANCH ROAD (A-15)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission made recommendation at its
meeting of March 13, 1985.
SUMMARY:
This annexatiot represents the balance of the Trt-Steel Structures,
inc. properties beginning at the northeast corner of 380 and Mascb
Branch Road. Zoning and plat approval for a five acre portion of
the let-Steel tract has been reviewed and approved by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council directed staff to annex the entire Tri-Steel
structures property in Octooer, 1984. A portion of the property
along the Hwy 380 frontage is includod in a strip annexation.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
No population or housing currently exists at the site.
FISCAL IKPACT:
Undetermined
Respectfull submit d;
s
0. Chris Hartung
Prepared by: City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App ved-
Jeff Meye a~
Director oti P1%,uaing
and Community 9evelopment
0736]
c r '
'`~f~n: d..i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK- Up_,$UMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing regarding the petition of
the City of Denton for annexation of approx-
imately 42,35 acres of land situated in the
S. Huizar Survey, Abstract 514 and beginning
approximately 500 feet north of and perpen-
diculac to the center line of US Highway 380
and west, of Masch Branch Road (A-15)
SUMMARY: This annexation represents the balance of the
Tri-Steel Structures, Inc. property beginning at
the northeast corner of 380 West and Masch
Branch Road. Zoning and plat approval for a
five acre office site has been reviewed and
accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council. The City Council directed
staff to annex the entire Tri-Steel Structures,
Inc, property in October, 1984. Annexation of
the balance of the parcel was delayed pending
the submission of a proper legal description.
This is an involuntary annexation; however, the
property owner has .:ot objected to date.
ACTION REQUIRED: No action is required to continue the annexation
process
PROGRAMS,
DRPARTKENTS, OR
GROUPS AFFECTED: No population or housing exists at the site in
question.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annexation Map
2. Annexation Schedule
David ISMson
Senior Planner
0719j(2)
e
5"..OWL
r,
Masch .
Branch R
71
s y
ti.
e d
~ti wF '1 + w> + !"r" 9 'r] Y . !fi / "r'~,`~'.~'7-rY -77;7 A-i5
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
February 25, 1965 Submit agenda item
February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*i4arch 05, 1985 City Council sets date, time and
place for public nearing
Marcn 06, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 11, 1985 Submit, agenda item
March 12, 19V Submit agenda bacK-up
*March 19, 1985 City Council hcIds public hearing
March 20, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 260 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 02, 1985 City council holds public hearing
April 15, 1985 t'ubmit agenda item
April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute .nnexation
proceedings
April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance
May 27, 1985 Submit agenda item
May 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
• *June 041 1985 Final action by City Council
*Denotes action by the City Council
09649
,'$~r K. .9
DA c, 'OSA4%85
CITY COUNCIL RRPORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the city council
FROii: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING THE PETITION OF HAMNETT & WASH,
INC. AND THE CITY OF DENTON FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 150.0
ACRES LOCATED WEST OF MAYHILL ROAD APPROXIMATELY 41000 FEET NORTH OF
I-35 AND ADJACENT AND NORTH OF THE MK&T RAILROAD (A-17)
RECOMMEND IO :
Tho Planning and Zoning Commission made recommendation at its
meeting of Karel, 13, 1985.
Hammett. & Nash, Engineers and Surveyors, Inc, have submitted a
voluntary request for annexation and light industrial coning on a SO
acre portion of this site. staff is recomxmendin3 annexing the
additional 100 acres to incorporate all of the area west of Mayhill
Road. High intensity development guide policies are applicable.
BACKGROUND:
The petition for annexation and zoning was submitted in February,
1985.
FOGRJ1sL ,DEPARTMENTS OR CROUPS AFFECTED:
One house and an estimated two persons currently exist in the area
proposed for annexation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Resp uXsba~t d:
i/~G •
0. Chris Hartung
Prepared by: A ' City Manager
UX U!.!'.~UO'm
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Appro a
Jeff Meyer,
Director of Planning
and Cowunity Development
0736]
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19. 1985
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing concerning the petition of
Hammett & Nash, Inc. and the City of Denton (or
annexation of approximately 150 acres of land
located west of Mayhill Road approxi,a,ately 4,000
feet north of I-35 and adjacent ana north of the
MK&T railroad (A-17)
SUMMARY: Hammett & Nash, Engineers and Surveyors, Inc.
have submitted a voluntary request for annexa-
tion and light industrial zoning on a 5o acre
portion of this site. staff is recommending
annexing the additional loo acres to incorporate
all of the area wee!: of Mayhil~ Road. High
Intensity Development Guide policies are
applicable to this area. The west halt of
Mayhill Road for a distance of approximately
2,000 feet is included In this annexation
proposal.
ACTION REQUIRED: No action is requited to continue the process
PROGRAMS,
DEPARTMENTS, OR
GROUPS AFFECTED: All departments responsitle for services and
programs guaranteed to City residents (Police,
Fire, Solid Waste, Library, etc.). One house
and an estimated two persons reside in the area
to be annexed.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annexation Map
2. Annexation Schbdule
CtJ W~_
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0719j(1)
,p z" y°:~.. w M. r F a '4 ♦ i Ki ~r: 'r n.. r •:.r r ~7 1 ~'~`Ta~*F b° ~Y y 'r t ° ~~Y~ .f'
~.rA r,- ! r ~ > Y r'k M e Y z ✓.'R t t r 1 di Y
r- ~r
w
N
/ V
/r
/ _17 L^..
' II
!
t L r, A R r y ' 1 '.i.3 "v A ens ^It1Y a. 4 e
~ r~ S 7. • _o- M 1;~'i ~ f [v .a $ v r fi d h N ♦ '7,~t 1 6' t V ~ ~ ,~N~~.i
f .,err,
• A-17
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
i
*March 05, 1985 City Council sots date, time a,-.d
place for public hearing
March 06, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*March 19, 1985 City Council holds public hearing
March 20, 1985 Natice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 22, 1985 Publish notice and inailout
March 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 02, 1985 City Council holds public hearing
April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item
April 16, 1985 Submit agenda hack-up
*April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City
council to institute annexation
proceedings
April 25, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance
May 27, 1985 Submit agenda item
May 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*June 04, 1985 Final action by City Council
*Denotes action by the City Council
0964g
x h y r n e.~wl~e"t'~ t.° S pi N t~.,p s! .7yy;.
Zvi
DATgs OVIA 8S
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING THE PETITION OF REDDITCH
INVESTMENTS CORPORATION FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 60.38 ACRES
SITUATED IN THE 0. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1330, AND BEGINNING
ADJACENT AND EAST OF EDWARDS ROAD (A-~8)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission made recommendation at its
meeting of March 13, 1985.
SUMMARY:
The petiticners have submitted a request for voluntary annexation
to the Planning end Community Development Do*•srtment. Staff
anticipates an application for planned development (PD) toning
classification if the annexation is approved,
BACKGROUND:
This site is adjacent and east of Edwards Road (an unimproved dirt
road which must be upgraded at developer's expense) and low
intensity development guide policies are applicable.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS bQRRCTED:
Not applicrble at this stage.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetscained
Res tfullj sub it d:
pe
a 3k,;;k" -
0. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Peepace by:,
~Wj R"
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App ve
Jeff Mayp
Director of Planning
and Commurity Development
01365
L
"::.v '+fr!'~'. ..*'a 4"- r,w~. Fee 4~l ^n, rF,z+ r ^t m,. ar,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 19, 1985
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing concerning the petition of
Redditch Investments Corp. for annexation of
approximately 60.38 acres situated in the G.
Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and beginning
adjacent and east of Edwards Road. (A-18)
SUMMARY: The petitioners have submitted a request for
voluntary annexation to the Planning and
Community Development Department, Included in
j the a'ptachments is a concept plan which staff
anticipates as the basis for a future change in
zoning request. This site is adjacent, and east
of Edwards Road (an unimproved dirt road that
must be upgraded at developers expense). The
east half of the north-south portion of Edwards
Road for a distance of approximately 1.860 feet
and the north half of the east-west portion of
Edwards Road for a distance of approximately
1,330 feet is included in this proposal.
The Allan Estates Mobile Home Park site (5-165)
is located adjacent and west of Edwards Road.
Existing Andrew Corporation facilities and
property is also located in this vicinity.
Current land use patterns along the Mayhilt Road
corridor range from low and moderate density
residential to the City Wastewater Treatment
Plant and new landfill, and light industrial.
ACTION REQUIRED: No action is required to continue the process
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annexatio-, Map
2. Land Use Concept Plan
3. Annexation Schedule
Oki
David Ellison
senior Planner
10679
~~r Y2 s r i`^s Y o a a r~=' ti: 1 M i ~t ti r .
'e^
• ~ Wig
111fI1
i
w
•
.
S~
1.
WA Owl b
,yy
,
EDWAROS OAP ICITY of DENTON)
8
°a A-18
o° e!
J ALLAN f1,AT%S
2 AUJILE %cMf
a PARK
to.
K
ROAD
ANDREW CORP
ZONE AC. LOTS DENSITY
S.F.- 7 25.0 113 4.5
ZZRO 9.4 51 5.4 s
M. F. 12.4 144 1511/s
FLOE; I3.083
soa om. ,
TOTAL 60.393 358 5.9
VICINITY MAP
N' 1000'
PARKER
ONLY
Y t.4 wiz r ax qs~ 1 ~ Fe t&$u ~
• A-18
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
February 25, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 26, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*March 050 1985 City council sets date, time and
place for public hearing
March 060 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 08, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
March 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
March 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*March 19r 1985 City Council holds public hearing
March 20, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 22, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
• March 25, 1985 Jubmit agenda item
March 2i1 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 02, 1985 City Council holds public hearing
April 15, 1985 Submit agenda item
April 16, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*April 23, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings,
April 25, 1985 ordinance to Denton Record
Chronic :a
April 28, 1985 Publish ordinance
May 27, 1985 Submit agenda item
May 28, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
i
*June 04, 1985 Final action by City Council
*Denotes action by the City Council
09648
s4~ M ,`ht r r m_J a y eg~"11R',f!a` < ems.
08~Oh (441,) ,
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR
THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competi-
tive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment,
supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law
and City ordinances; rnd
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed
and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest
responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplied or services
as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000;
and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter regwires that every
act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for thi-
contracting of indebtedness shalt be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the numbered iter.s in the following numbered bids for
materials equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid
Proposalsh attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as
being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BID NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR ~3f0UNT
9394 All Internat'l Environmental X21,293.00
_qu pment ompany
9398A All Industrial Disposal Supp. $13,470.00
9411 All Dictaphone $26,902.00
9413 1-16 Rainen Business Interiors "401.84
9413 28.37 Rainen Business Interiors S 3,579.17
9413 38.45 Business Essentials J 2,843.00
9413 _ 46-48 Denton Office Supply $ 705.00
9414 .W 1 and 9 Dixie PetroChem 13b1590.00
9414 6 RUA Chemical $22,200.00
9414 21718 Stinnes Chemical $951055.00
9414 3 Hancock Industries L91450.00
9414 4 McKesson Chemical J3,403,00
9414 5 Van Water L Rollers $41800.00
1415 All Denton Office SUD01Y 170,200,00
•et a t r.amt
t r
9418 All ~Bighorn Excavating & X3,047.00
Gcadi'n ompgpy,
941y All uric c 11 a,t, Fence _ $16,507.50
9420 All ^ Yittek Golf Supply L8,688.00
9422 1 B & M Truck 8 3X3.00
9422 2 & 3 Fleet Body & Equipment 8 3,037.00
9423 All Poleline Electric 8 6,326.00
9424 All Neptune Water Meter 3 5,500.00
9425 All A. B. Chance Co. 5,725.00
9429 4111 Vallen Safety 810,869.32
SECTIUN II.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Preposals, and related documents.
SECTION III.
That should the City and persons submitting approved and
accepted !teas and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his
designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the
written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
the written contract is in accordance with the terms,
conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified
sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents
herein approved and accepted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the city Council hereby authorizes
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 19th day of March, 1985.
RICHARD 0. , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTO{{N, TEXAS
BYs t1, c.l 1' ~~~`11-01~
DATE: 3-19-85
CITY COUNCIL AErOR'r FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19394 PATHOLOGICAL INCINERATOR
RECUMM EN DA'rION: He recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specification of International Environmental
Equipment Co. In the amodnt of $21,293.00 including
concrete slab.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a 200 lb,. per hour
pathological incinerator for the Animal Control Center.
The unit is designed for the appropriate disposal of
animal carcasses and organic waste.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet '
FROGRMIS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFEG' ED:
Animal Control Center
FISCAL 114,0114T: Funds for this purchase have been budgeted in the
1984-85 Fiscal Budget Account Number 430-004-02OM-9132
Special Projects.
Res tf ly b ted:
City Manager
pared {b
Name Title Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
AV oved:
Ourchjaslng Marshall, C.P.M.
19 1 Agent
r_ 41Nq-A
SID TITLE PATUDIOGICAI MrINERATOR
OPENED_ March 5. 1985 2 p.m. NTERNATIONA INCINERATOR HOR-LINE
NVIRONMENTA SPECIALTY CHROER MFG.
ACCOUNT I QPT. CO. CO. 0.
TY, I~TEN DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 PATHOLOGICAL INCINERATOR 1293.00 22116.00 4255.00
2 1 Concrete Foandation included ncluded ncluded
Deliver _ 0 Days 50 Days 0 Days I
DATE: 3-1.-85
CITY COUNCIL RHPORT 17-0101AT
'r0: Mayor and Members Of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris liartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID ,t9398A 30 CU. YARD CONTAINERS (SECOND AWARD), . .
RECOMMENDATiON•
' We recommend this bid be awarded to the evaluated low
bidder of Industrial Disposal Supply in the amount of
$2,694.00 per container.
SUMM AR Y: This bid is for the purchase of 30 cu, yd. refuse containers
to be used in the commercial refuse collection program.
BACKGROUND: We purchased 5 containers from the lowest bidder, Scott' b Hill,
on 2/5/85. We now have requirements for additional containers.
We feel like the latch design from Scott'8 Hill is not
satisfactory. We are requesting this second group be awarded
to I.D.S. The $24.00 per container for the superior latch
is the basis for this recommendation.
PROGRAMS, DEPARV ENTS Oft GROUPS AFFECTED:
Soli Waste Department
FISCAL 114PACT: 1984-85 Solid Waste Bond Funds
Account Number 631-002-08U3-9104
RespetjLLv su wi ted:
•
G. Uri 11a r n8
City Manager
P aced y
Nli Tom D. Shrw, C.P.M.
'title Assistant Purchasing Agent
A pproreds
a 1, Jpfi 14arshall, C.P. 4.
1 le ' urchesing Agent
err n V ..r
,ID TITLE 30 Y0. CONTAINERS CUSTOM NVIRONMENTA DUNCAN SCOTT 6 I.D.S.
IIETALS ALES A EQUIPMENT ILL STEEL
iPENED January 24, 1985 2 P.m. INDUSTRIES SERVICE CO. CO. ORP.
CCOUNT
QTY. I'M DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
30 ~u. Yd, Containers Open-Top 2,795.00 1,443,Bn 2,04n-nn -?.670.00---- ~,694,00
Delivery A.R.O. 30 Days 0 Days30 Days 0 DAys 5 Days
I
i Fri
s
UATB: 3-19-85
C1'fY COUNCIL REHIVf 17-0I01AT
CUs Mayor and Heaabers of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
S U BJ BCT: BID 19411 POLICE DICTATION SYSTEM
RfiL;% lI311DAr101t: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bid meeting
specifications and the evaluated low bidder, Dictaphone
Corp., for the Lease/Purchase for 60 months either to
Dictaphone or bid lease/purchase vendor whichever is the
best; but not to exceed the amount of $683.31 per month.as
bid by Dictaphone.
SUIItIAR Y= This bid was sent out on a prior bid when we discovered
we had not included all the equipment. We then-sent this
bid out and received only one bid meeting specifications
as Lanier bid partly used equipment.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRN•IS, DEI'ARVIlili'i'S Olt GItUUrS Ar-FECI'EU:
Police Department Updating of their Call-In
Reporting System.
rISCA L 1H rACT: Police Dept. Budget 100-001-0042-9106
Respectfully subw ted:
a
far Maupger
Prepirred by:
J J. Marsha II C. P.M.
tie Purchasing Agent
Ap roreds "
lc~ o n Marshall, C.P.N.
Purchasing Agent
SID TIT(-E.- cF__ _DICTATION CYCT.FN
HARRIS- ICTAPHONE
OPENED Fahruary 26, 19RS 7 LANIER
ACCOUNT
XIEN DESCRIPVJON YEN r VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
Total Equipment Purchase 18,397.80 6,902,00
Monitoring Console Used New
Lease/Purchase 60 Month 539.09 683.31
4,469.00 29292.00
Evaluated Total 45,796.99 43,290.60
j
f
DATE: 3-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19413 OFFICE FURNITURE
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest and best
bidders as follows:
Items 1-16 Rainen Business Interiors $8,401.84
Items 28-37 Rainen Business Interiors 3,579.17
Items 38-45 Business Essentials 2,843.00
Items 46-48 Denton Office Supply 705.00
SUMMARY: This bid is to complete the furniture for the Finance,
Accounting, Tax, etc. area. We received three complete
bids. We are rejecting Items 17 through 27 from this
portion of the bid. This section was higher than we
BACKGROUND: thought it should be. ;
Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Capital Improvement, Remodelling
FISCAL_114PACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Respecsf~`],~s uhm L44 ted: Z44:90
G, MIS a Ft
City Manager
Pre ared :
VaMA le o n . Marshall, C.P.M.
Purchasing Agerst
Approved:
N&Va o n 0, Marshall, C. P, M,
le Purchasing Agent
BID ! 9413
ItD TITLE OFFICE FURNITURE
OPENED February 269 1985 2 p.m. BUSINESS INEN BUSINESS ENTON
ESSENTIALS BUSINESS INTERIORS OFFICE
ACCOUNT I INTERIORS SUPPLY
IOTY, TEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR- VENDOR VE R YEN R VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
2638.00 2343.71 2686.80
File& 798.00 ' 719.58 806.85
& A- Production Furniture 2748.00 2460.22 2777.00
Z116 Files 4008.00 2878.32 ' 4074.00
1237 18 Desk b 1:rawers 1777.00 1764.20 1859.85
27 Office Furniture 3346.00 3050.38 3564.35.
Office Furniture 3758.00 3579.17 3913.80
38 44 Chair 6 TAbles 2099.00 2618.70 2593.70 2760.00
45 Chair 744.00 NB 769.95 NB
46-48 Conference Accessories 718.00 NB 996.80 705.00
Total Items 1-37 19073.00 16795.59 19683.15
Total Items 1-45 21112.00 19414.29 22276.85
Total ltens 1.48 22634.00 - 24043.60
Deliver 45-60 Da s 70 Da s 2-6 Weeks
DATE: 3-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Mebers of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19414 WATER TREATMENT CHEMCIALS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded by item to the lowest
evaluated bidder:
Award To Item Yearly Estimated Cost
Dixie PetroChem 11 @ 296.40 Ton $29,640.00
Dixie PetroChem 19 @ .25 Lb. 61950.00
Russ Chemical 16 @ 111.00 Ton 229200.00
Stinnes Chemical 12 @ .59 Lb. 1118)0.00
Stinnes Chemical 17 @ 175.00 Ton 399375.00
Stinnes Chemical 18 @ 1.097 Lb. 43,880.00
Hancock Industries 03 @ .1890 Lb. 9,450.00
McKesson Chemical 04 @ 69.90 Ton 3,495.00
Van Waters 6 Rogers 15 @ .48 Lb. 4,800.00
Total Estimated Amount for 1 Year $171,390.00
SUMMARY: This is the yearly bid for water chemicals and awards are
mace for one year. When the bid is not firm and the price
increases, we evaluate at that time and-quote each delivery
or rebid the separate items.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
This bid is awarded by items only.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Water Production, Waste Water Treatment, and Electric Production
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General fund. The
1985 Budget for each division will pay a~ delivered.
Respectful1 submitt
G. C47s Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
John J. Marshall , G. P.M.
le Purchasing Agent
ved:
AA 0 .n J. Ma rs al ,C. P, M.
Title Purchasing Agent
BID
BID YAIEl~6EAiitlNi~NEtl1CALi_ AN MTERS ICUSSON OC[ SIINNES 011TE CHIN S DI, IN ]IONEER ANUS IKNIPSON IAUFFER
RMRS IIEIIICAI NOUSIRIES CIINICAL PETWHEN CENTRAL NEHICAL HE111CAL 111CAL IIENICALS IATIm NEHICAL
(MEN 11~rsh1~19Q5-_f~.~. AMC.
%CCOUNT 1
1f "-'TiLR"IIL'`SC'1fiR'Fl VEf BM VMMK- VE 561t VLMdlr- YEWDOR VZNDO MWk- TSB- IF- MM= VEAr*W- VMWff- -YE
I 00 T Lfquld Chlorine M.10 - - 705.06 -
L. :Q4EII!<lls7lRe! tl~4soMLe 22_ _,¢9_ S9 ,ibr5 .6595
s _SodluR Sl~tofluorlde 22 .1890 .205 .8721 - 1165 - _~21
1 1 Sulfuric Arid 69.90 22.00 91.20 - 69.90 104.00 _ 5.OW& L
5 0/m Tetrs-potassluw ► r nos Mte .41 .2120 MA 1626 .1910 - .646
-AL -
6 _ Llgulq Alu~lnw 5u1 Mlp_ 1 _ ~ ~
• 111.00
126.60
L -?26 Llqula Caustic Sods 205.00 210.00 132.29 126.00 119.00 W so - 116.00 y -
1 00/ PotessluN Perwen9+noste 1.26 1.22
- T----- 1.21
I
DATE: 3/19185
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Bid #9415 Office Operating Supplies
RECOMMENDATION: we recommend this bid be awarded to tht bidder with
the highest percentage off of list price, Denton Office
Supply at 351 off list. Delivery will be in 2 days.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of standard operating office
supplies.
' I
I
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheets
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED. All Departments
FISCAL I14PACT: As bugeted by Departments for Office Supplies
Respect Eu ly sub fitted;
a A Me
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name Denise Manning
Title Buyer
A oV4EC
2CLl~~
itle urchasingsA~ e At
.y 4 I ♦&I
!ID TITLE Office Operating Supplies
u w d
OPENED 4i u
44 2pot 3 5/85 w u w
as g~5 8
ACCOUNT i Budget y ,t7q w a
y w ~ ~ ~ N
H
TY. TE! 1 TIO
VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 Percent Discount off list price 352 27z 29% 2sz
s 4 • S w
VATE: 3-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPURT C0101AT
TO: Mayor and members of the City Cow:cll
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Mauager
SU BJ GCTI BID (9418 DEMOLITION A CLEARING OF LOTS
RECOMMENL'A IOU: We recommen6 this bid be awarded to the low bidder,
Bighorn Ex-avating A Grading Co., for all three items
totallipy 539-097.00,
SUNN AR Ys This bid is for the clearing of some lots., etc. in Denton
through a Community Development Grant. We sent out the
bids to all approved contractors, properly advertised, then
received and opened the bids on March 5, 1985.
DACKUROUNI?: Tabulation Sheet '
w
rROOK14IS, UEPARTHHU1'S Olt GROUTS AFFECTED:
Community Development Block Grant
FISCAL 11VACT: There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund.
Resp tE/ s ~t ed:ed
r, ClirIs' I1FEUitl-
City Mauager
Pre tired b s
tle J J. Marshall, C.P.M.
urchasing Agent
A o v ed s
t~e o Marshall, C.P.M,
Pu+'aasing Agent
r
-sin f 9418
8ID TITLE DEMOLITION A CLEARING OF l,¢
CALVERT BURLEYS 1GHORN M&M OLDEN CHARLIE ILLIE
OPENED_ Aiarch 5, 1985 2 p.m. PAYING CO. CONST. XCAYATING CONST. TRIANGLE WEATMAN EDMAN
GRADING
ACCOUNT i
IOTY._ _ IT ESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
.1 _
1-105 E. Hickory 51. 1200.00 2400.00 ` 889.00• 3350.00 440.00 500.00 500.00
2 1 42, Robertson St. 1720.00 4600.00 1514.00 4450.00 660.00 800.00 `1000.00
f
112 S. Wood St- 1120.00 ?400.00 .0 _ 1950.00 - 2440.00 6
30Das 17 DaXs 10 Days 27 Days 14 Days 15 Days Days
J-=
Total 4040.00 9400.00 097.00 9750.00 540.00 900.00 3OO.OO
1
•
DATE: 3-19-85
Curt COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECTS BID #9419 LANDFILL FENCING
RECOMM ENDATI014: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder,
Hurricane Fence, in the amount of $16,501.50. Work to
begin in seven days.
SUI.IMARY: This bid is for the labor and materials -to fence the
new landfill on the north and west side with 6' chain
link fencing. This will replace a temporary fence now
in place. The south and east side have satisfactory
fencing for now.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet '
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMPHTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Solid Waste Sanitary Landfill
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Sanitary Landfill Bond Funds
Account #630-002-0803-9001
Respe tf ly s b tted:
U-.Cll7ts ag
y City Manager
P<d 1.
1
Naa:e Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M.
Tltte Assistant Purchasing AGent
Appro ed:
. Marshall, C.P.M.
le Purchasing Agent
~v a uAlu
DID TITLE LANDFILL FENCING
MORROW ENTON BARNS HURRICANE
OPENED March 1, 1985 2 p.m. FENCE CO. ENCE CO. FENCE CO. FENCE CO.
ACCOUNT !
QTY IT DESCRIPTION
YENDOtt VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
6" 5.87 8.30 6.18
4' w T Gate 175.12 240.00 80.75
" DD Gate 461.02 600.00 255.50
24' DDT Gate 502.60 720.00 290.00
TOTAL 17709.:? 2691.40 30477.00 16507.50
Delivery 30 Days 0 Days 7 Day Star
a,.r .ta rV .k„' 1 ti` r ..n
'TIP
W.
HATE: 3-19-85
CITY COUNCIL RGrORT C0RAAT
TO: Mayor and Members of tl:e City Council
FROM: G. Chris llartung, City Mrnager
SUBJECT: BID #9420 GOLF EQUIPMENT A SUPPLIES
RECUWKfiI1HAr1O11: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only compiiete
bidder, Wittek Golf Supply, inc., for the total sum of
$8,688.00. •
SL 1ARY: This b11 is for the supplies necessary to properly handle
the City Driving Range. The bid was sent to several vendors.
However, we received only rune bid. The prices and delivery
are reasonable and in the essence of time, we recommend
the bid be awarded.
BAC9GROUHU: Bid Proposal as received.
I
PROGRAMS, UEPARTHI;N-fS Olt GRUUPS AFFEC'ffil):
Funds available Io 261-003-0062-8112.
FISCAL 11-1PACT: This purchase does not have additional impact on the
General Fund.
Respe c-t Me s W ted:
,
CItr I I IiTIUrg
City Manager
Prepared by.,
Marshal , . M.
Atil-P Purchasing Agent
Approved:
PINS o n MarshallC. .M.
Durchasing Agent
nq<
r,M1
Vli
BID NUMBER 9420 BID PROPOSALS Page 2 of 2
ITEM OESCCIPTION WAN, PRICE AM)UNr -
1. 05 Golf Ball Pails 50 $3,15 $ '57,50
2. 17 Golf Ball Pails 50 $3.75 $ 187.50
3. R-2 Utility Plastic Coated Baskets 15 $13.60 $ 204.00
4. Solid Range Balls, Wh/St only 500 doz. $ 5.35 $2675.00
5. Distance Markers advise numbers? 4 $180.00 $ 720.00
6. Driving Range Rule Board 1 $98.00 $ 98.00
7. Senior Golf Picker 1
$1800.00 $18DO.00
8. W-70 Heavy Duty Commercial Golf Ball Washer 1
$1320.00 $1320.00
9. Odd Woods advise Men or women..? 20 $10.95 $ 219.00
10. Bagged Golf Tees, 1 7/8" Amount per bag.? 15 M $ 12.00 $ 180.00
11. Odd Irons #advise men or womens and numbers? 20 $8 .35 $ 167.00
12. RW400 Tee Mats complete with 1224)-70 brash mat.. g
$120.00 $ 960.00
TOTALS $8688.00
f We quote the above f.o.b. Denton, Texas, Shipment can be made in 1h -23jeys front receipt of order. Terms net
unless otherwise indicated.
In submitting the above bid, the vendor agrees that acceptance of any or all bid items by the City of Denton, Texas within a
reasonable period of time cornlitues a contract.
3650 AVoNDALis AyB. WITPEK GOLF SUPPLY C0,,p)IN,
McIIMtit AAMess I Aar
CHICAGO IL.L.. , , 60618
city state Z10 St stun
312-463-2636. Natl. Mrkt~Mgr.
Yer~pAen. 71Ua
-a--q ''ice'{ "C`:' 1 1 N.' i r a YF" t Eq^o+ 5 y r es
DATE: 3-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REFORT FORMKr
TOI Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19422 TRUCK BED A BODIES
RBCOMM ENDAfION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder for
each item as shown on the tab sheet Item 1 to B 3 M
Truck for a•total of $3,728.00 and Item 2 b 3 to Fleet
Body b Equipment Co., for a total of $3,037.00. Total
bid award $6,765.00.
SUI'IM AR Y: This bid is for the service bodies and contractor type
body for the new trucks awarded earlier. The trucks
are being delivered this month.
BACKGRUUN D: Tabulation Sheet '
FROGRNIS, DEFAR'INEUTS Oil GRUUFS AFFECTO.
Vehicle Maintgnance/Motor Pool
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Res tf y s t ed:
C . "Cli iri-3-11ir Eli i'ig
City FIauager
Prn red b :
)41~- 006 Ma rsha 1, C. .
Ptk/Purchasing Agent
Approved= "
Nn o rshall, C.P.M.
le rchasing Agent
BID 1 g49a
SID TITLE TRUCK $ED A BODIES
OPENED March 12, 1985 2 p.m. FLEET B&M
BODY 8 TRUCK
ACCOUNT I EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT
CO.
QTY, ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
F
1 2 Service Body 3/4 Ton 1885.00 1864.00
2 , 1 Service Body I Ton 2185.00 2277.00
1 1 Contractor Body 1 Ton 852.00 998.00
Delivery 15 Days 14 Days
Fob Denton Denton
i
a
DATE: 3-19-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Cliris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID /9423 LINE STRINGER
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
of Poleline Electric in the amount c' ;1,581.50 ea.,
Fob Denton.'
SUHM AR Y: This bid is for the purchase of a four (4) line stringing
unit used in the construction and maintenance Qf the
overhead Electric Distribution system.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet '
PROGRMS, DEPAR'1?TENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Distribution
FISCAL IMPACT. 1984-85 Budget Funds 610-008-025209232
Electric Distribution Tools and Shop Equipment
Res t ly b i ted:
G. Cirls a lg -
City Manager
P `ared b r
flame Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
V
e , J. Marshall, C.P.M.
tie Purchasin9 Agent
DID 1 9123
bIU_ LINE SiRIHGERy+ ~
OPEN r Ha uESCO PRIESTER TEIP LE POLELIME KRI2-DAYIS EMERAL IELSOM B.R. RAYBAR
rch ]11985 2 0 ■ IFCTRIC IECTRIC NC.
ACCOUNT 1 UPPLY 0.
NVOR VENDOR-
-fFY: Vim-" Vili3fr- -"N6aTi" Man- VEF6bff"- SRI ION 1 4 _ Pulling line Strin ey. r MB NB MB 1,581.50 -3m34J,QQ
MB MB
lA6MAL
Delivery 56 Days Slays 5 Da
LEE
ti~ d "h ~y-r1 a' 4!h`, 'a 4 did 'u i. T 1 a r off` .a x
UATB: 3-19-85
G1'1'Y COUNCIL REPOlU FORHAT
'ro: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJEL"C: 810 19424 8" WATER METER
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder,
Neptune Meter Co., in the amount of $5,500.00 with delivery
in 45 days:
SUMMARY., This bid is for the purchase of an eight (8) inch
compound water meter for the TWU Library.
BACKGRUUND: Tabulation Sheet '
PROGRAMS, DEPARTHE111'S OR CRUUPS AFFECTED:
Water 3 Sewer Field Service
F iSCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Fiscal Budget Account 620-008-0461-9117
Respectf iy sub tted:
u1-1rT -11a rig
City Manager
Pr ared b
flaa:e Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
T1 "e Assistant Purchasing AGent
Approved
KnV tlo r
P:frchasln§Agent~ C.P.M.
SID TITLE_ Kil WATER METER ROCKWELL ERSEY MUNICIPAL HERSEY BADGER NEPTUNE ERNARD
INT'L RODUCTS METER CO. PRODUCTS METER CO. TER %SSOCIATES
OPENED
March 7. 1985 2 p.m. 0. CO.
ACCOUNT !
O-Ty _ I Eil DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 1 8" Compound Meter 6045.62 920.00 • 6643.00 6920.00 H8 5500.00 6875.00
Deliver 90 Days 5 Days 20 Days 45 Days 5 Days 5 Days
Fob Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton nton
i ~„y> M1 z• .x k~^'of m.: Iir A 1y < ~ . .4i:.~ n'r • t * DATE: 3-19-85
Cl'ry COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: VO 19425 PADMOUNT SWITCNGEAR
R ECOMM ENUATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder,
A.B. Chance Co., in the amount of $5,725.00 ea. with
delivery in'4-6 weeks.
SUI•IMARIf: This bid is for the purchase of sIx units of 15KV, 3 phase,
7620/13200 volt pi,dmount switchgear. This material will
be used by the Electric Distribution Department in.the
maintenance and new construction of the electric system.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEFARyist Ts OR GROUPS AFFEC'T'ED:
Electric Distribution U%,!partment
FISCAL 114FACT: 1984-85 ;•,scal Bu.,,et Ar.count Number 610-008-0252-9221
Electric System Underground Conductors
Res~.~~ s ;MIN
•
G-7VIris nor i
City Hanaher
P ` ar.ed y:
Flame Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title Assistant Purctrasing Agent
A pproveds
4M IT. tle urthasingrAGent~ 'P~M.
BID 1_ 9415 _ I
DID
~PAD_MDUNi sW1IGNGE9R,_
OPEN A. B. TEMPLE WESCO GRAYBAR CUR4INS NELSCo' KRI2-DAYIS RIESTER ENERAL
March 7 1985 2 o.~ CHANCE INC. SUPPLY CO. ELECTi;IC CO. SUPPLY LECTRIC
ACCOUNT 1 CO. UPPLY CO.
`1-~P -`3'Ft bE cFiI~filo
v R5mv- YEAbSfi VENDOR - V fiW
-l WNW- ENDOR
1 Pad M Switch ar 5 725.00 6,105. 6,223.00 6.193.70 6,085.00 ` NB 6,094.00 50950.00 NB
___Delivery _ 4.6 Wks 105 Days _ 98 Days 13-1i Wks
r
.
'k, 4 d
t
VATCS: 3-19-85
C1'rY COUNCIL, REPOR-f FORNA'1•
A
'rot Mayor and Membors of the City Couwicil 4
FROM: G. Clkris Ilartung, City Manager
SUDJBC'r: BID #9429 AIR PAKS
R SCOHNEIIUAF1011: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Vallen
Safety, for seven one-hour air packs, with extra cylinder
and valve asemblies at $10,869.32. j
SUMMARY: This bid was sent to all available vendors, and we received
only 2 bids with one no bid response. We specify Scott
as they are compatible with our present supply.*
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet -
rROGRN.IS, UGPAR'011111TS OR GRUUPS AFFCC'i'BD: -
Fir Department Budget Account 100-006-0051-9104
FISCAL 1144 ACT: Ther is no impact on the General Fund.
Res DU tf ly sub tted:
i/ yJc: c:~~-~-11
City Mauagor
Prepared by:
!t! o n J. Marshall, C.P.H.
Purchasing Agent
Approvedi
n I~, J c "Aarshall C.P. .
urchasing Agent
L
SID ! 9429
BID TITLE AIR PAKS
OPENED March 12, 1985 2p.m. KOETTER ALLEN
FIRE SAFETY
ACCOUNT I PROTECTION
_lom ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 7 Scott 1-Hour Air Pak 1129.00 + 1050.00
2~7 60 Mo. Cylinder b Valve Assembly 529.00 502.76
1
1
• NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THU
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS: PROVIDING
FOR THE EXPENDITURE ~F FUNDS THEREFOR: AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the construction of public works or improve-
ments in accordance with the rrLcedures of state law and City
ordinanes; and
WHEREAS, the City Manage-. or a designated employee has
received and recommended tha: the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of tho public works
or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals
and plane and specifications therefore; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council appr, ie all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY
ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the following competitive bids for the construction of
public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita-
tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached
hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest
responsible bids:
BID NUMB£A CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
9426 O.L.D. Company $13,150.00
SECTION II.
That the acceptance and approval of the above competititva
bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the
PACE 1
r
person submitting the bid for construction of such public works
or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person
shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to
Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and
furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification
of the award of the bid.
SECTION 111.
That the City Manager is hereby authorzied to excecute all
necessary written contracts for the performance of the
construction of the public works or improvements in accordance
with the bids accepted and approved hereic., provided that such
contracts are mode in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and
Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the
terse, conditions, plena and specifications, standards,
quantitates and specified sums contained therein.
SECTION IV.
That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive
bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and
improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized
contracts executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V.
That this ordnance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVBU this the 19th day of March, 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWXKTj MAYO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLFN~ CITY SECIETART
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED IS TO LEGAL FORMS
JUE D. MORRISO ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
r+ ~i 1 L . -PJCCE 2
oil)
`T_)14Tk . } i 1' 1 1 nl~u 9 A R.C Y::.A I ~ ! '1 C ~ CP r 1 .i^ " t
r~J r1 1 1'I ] ! f~ 1I
n r
I
r
DATE: 3-19-85
CI'T'Y COUNCIL REP01Vi' MOW
TU: Mayor and Members of the City Council
PROM: G. Chris Ilartung, City Manager
SUPJ SC'r: BID 19426 CLEAN 6 PAINT 2,000,000 GALLON GROUND LEVEL
WATER STORAGE TANK
RECOI4MENUA'TI011: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder,
O.L.D. Company, Inc., for the total anount of $73,750.0.9.
Work to begin on or before May 1, 1985.
I
SU1*1ART: This bid is for the contractual services to clean and
paint the inside of this water tank at the Water Production
Plant. We received only three bids. However, we sent
invitations to some six prospective vendors.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet,
I
I
PRUGRAMS, DEPAR'1'MEN'I'S 01: GIMIS ArFECTED:
Utilities improvement Program as budgeted.
TJSCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund,
Respectfully !kubVitted:
City Manager
P ared b s
o n Marshall, C.P.M.
ritie, Purchasing Agent
Approved$ U "
n JqnrKtr, -Marshall, C,P.M.
Us echasing Agent
8ID t od~~
SID TITLE_ CLEAN A PAINT NATEk TANK _
O.L.D. DON L. OMEN LIPTON
OPENED March 12. 1985 2 p.m. COMPANY PAINTING MINTING
ACCOUNT ! Inc. CONT. 0.
•
O TY. _ ITE1{ DESCR.CN VENDO V DO VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 1 Clean A Paint interior 73,750.00 39874.00' 40,693.00
of 2M Gal. Tank
_ E Da s
i
M', J( AC f
L 1; i S'4 t ~ r
0361, >
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING All AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF DENTON AND
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL
SERVICES, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, ,he City Council has determined that an inventory and
appraisal of the City's fixed assets is needed; and
WHEREAS, the city staff and the Finance Department has
recommended that American Appraisal Associates, Inc., be retained
to pertorm an inventory and appraisal services; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that ne City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton,
Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the
expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shall
be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby apr.oves and authorizes the Mayor
and City Secretary to execute and attest, respectively, the
agreement betxeen the City of Denton, and American Appraisal
Associates, Inc., providing for inventory and appraisal services
under the terms and conditions being contained in said agreement
which is attached hereto and madt a part hereof.
SECTION I1.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and npproval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of , 1985.
RICIUMD U. S , MAYO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTF- ALLENg CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, 4CTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYI
7777
wy rug a[R r.: r' r"" er,[ ! ~+,e~[iN C ~.tl el l~i~,1.
, "r f . 3038E ~ . ,
AGREEMENT FOR INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL SERVICES
This Agreements effective the day of , 1985,
by and between the CITY ::F DENTOH;'I' kkS, (herein'a teT er referred to
as City), and AMEBIC[ ' 1PPRAISAL ASSOCIATES INC. (hereinafter
referred to as American, a corporation with business offices at
Richardson, Texas.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City wishes to have a can Pfete inventory and appraisal
of its property performed (hereinafter referred to as Services);
acid
WHEREAS, American is prepsred to provide such services;
NOW, THBREFORE, in consideraticn of the premises and the mutual
covenants herein contained, the patties hereto agree as follows:
1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY AMERIC2iN.
American agrees to acromplii7 the following activities to
provide the Owner appropriate and necessary results from such
activities.
A. American will perform a complete inventory and appraisal of
all property owned by City, as more specifically d.~scribed
herein.
Property to be included in this appraisal will consist of
the buildings, appurtenances, machinery and equipment of the
City, including those asets of the water and sewer department
snd t'ne power system. Land will be included and valued based
on infnrmation provided by the City. Similarly, streets will
be valued on a depreciated cost basis.
Excluded iron the study vill be landscaping, supplies,
inventory, water and parking meters, and spate parts.
The Services described assume the use of City owned docu-
ments, such as plates plans, and blue prints and drawings of
city-owned property. This includes construction costs on
existing buildings, where available.
B. American will perform the services as fellows:
1. General inspection of the respective buildings by
experienced, qualified ap raisers from American's
permanent staff. They wilf obtain and record data
concerning sizes type of construction, as well as
classification of the building fixtures and exterior and
interior finish. They also will obtiA n pertinent
informations as applicable, for local prices of material
and labor.
2. An inspection r~ the machinery and equipment and
prepparation of an inventory base by experienced,
qualified appraisers from American's permanent staff.
These approsisers will, upon completion of their
inspection and through their experiences place the
contents in two categories:
PAGE I
I. Major equipment units which will be inventoried on an
individual basis.
2. Repetitive items, such as furniture and eqquipment of
relatively small unit value (less than. $100) will be
inventoried by groups or classes of property.
3. The appraisers will also record their estimate of the
accrued depreciation for insurance Purposes as evidenced
by observed condition in comparison with the new units of
like kind, with such regard to functional and economic
factors as are deemed relevant.
4. A summery for insurance purposes, by properties broken
down as above, with the replacement cost new and replace-
ment cost less Jepraclation and exclusions distributed by
buildings in accordance rith the insurance iorms applying
to the property.
5. Based on an analysis, pricing, and processing of these
records by qualified technicians, American will furnish
its opinion of the estimated replacement cost new and
estimated replacement cost less depreciation for
insurance purposes for the appraised property.
b. Acquisition costs and acquisition dates will be provided
through use of American's back trend modifiers. Americar
will search City records for purc;ase orders as appro-
priate and use information perteir,ing to acquisition
costa and dates as provided by Cit!'► staff.
C. American will prepare a report, printed in EDP format,
furnished in duplicate and a machine readable type, in EDP
format, for immediate input to the City's fixed asset
system, which will consist of:
1. An appraisal certification.
2. An inventory section arranged by buildings and classifi-
cations. Each page will contain the following data:
Property Model Number*
Building Serial Number*
Room or Area Manufacturer*
Fund Accountability Acquisition Cost**
'Computer I.D. No. Acquisition Date**
Class Code Replacement Cost New
Quantity Depreciated
Description Replacement Cost
*This information will be furnished whenever actually
located on the asset being appraised.
**Estimated by the appraiser through use of the back trend
modifier with the assistance of City staff for general
information.
2. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
A. The services provided by American will be performed in
accordance with taco nised professia al appraisal standards.
American's compensation is not contingent in any way Lion
their conelusions of value. American will assuma, without
Witp endent verification, the accuraoy of all data provided
to it by th.a City. American reserves the right to use
I
PAGE 2
subcontractors. All files, work papers, or documents
developed during the course of the services shall be
AmerLcan'a property. A-vrican wLll retain this data for
least five years.
5. American's appraisal is valid only for the purpose for which
It is stated herein. Any other use cr reliance by City or
third parties is invalid. The City may show American's
report in its entirety to interested parties outside their
organization; however, City agrees not to reference
American's name or their report, in whole or in part, in any
docum3n'. distributed to third parties without American's
prior written consent. American will, unless otherwise
directed by appropriste legal orders, maintain the confiden-
tiality of sill conversations, documents provid%~d to them,
and their report. These conditions can only be codified in
writing by both parties.
C. Ciey will pay to American for the services performed herein,
as billed montnly, for trio work done during that month. The
total cost of the services performed by Aaarican shall be as
follows:
1. Physical inventory, zemet
evaluation and reports thereon $54,000.00
2. Accounting policies
and procedures manual 6,400.00
Total Coat $60,400.00
D. American agrees to use its best efforts to pa,-form and
complete the services s2ecified herein by June 30, 1985 with
an update on asset changes frnm June 30, 1985 to September
39, 1985, to be completed by G.cober 30, 1985.
E. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the effective date
and end when all services by American have been performed,
.or by December 31, 1983, whichever is later.
3. UDEDENUONT CONTRACTOR.
American undertakes performance of the Services ms an indepen-
dent contractor and shall be wholly responsible for the methods
of performance. City shall have no right to supervise directly
the methods used but City shall have the right to observe such
performa,tre. American shall work closely with City in per-
forming Services under this Agreement.
4. GOVERNING L.Ad.
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
'texas.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement by
their duly nuttorited representatives effective the day and year
.first abtve written.
AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
9V:
PAGE 3
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
ATTEST:
CKARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECKETARY
CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I
BY:
i
PAGE 4
d .5 > L!, ,tr M1 9r i ',~ji 0 t V i~.- r {S } . a 5x r.y '1
e ii' t. R. Z 1 Y r
DA'm 03/19185
CITY COUNCIL RRPOU VORPAT Do
TO$ Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM, G. Chris Hartung, city Narsager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ADOPTION FOR Z-1712
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council considered this stern at its meeting of February 19,
1985 and voted to approve, the zoning change.
SU MARY0
This was a request for a change from the agricultural (A) district
to the light industrial (LI) classification on a 111.7 acre tract
located adjacent and north oi: Westgate Hospital approximately 600
feet west of the 1--35N service road.
@ACKGROM
The tract is located in both a moderate and high area which allows
for flexibility of land use and little control of intensity, Due to
surrounding light industrial/commercial zoning and land use, it is
unlikely that low density development will occur at this site.
PA.0G A1.3. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respectkll~~ut4o ~y~~QQjj,i►► ♦ G.
Chris Hartung
city manager
prepared by:
40,01ij
D ise S~pivdy
Urban Planner
App ve
Jeff M♦ a
Dir♦ctor of kana n6
and Cosssunity Developmat
10788
i
'F. y ~ ri : ! r u! S., ' F W rl... ~ R, 'e .i 4. ~ °ic' • r: 4 ♦ ~ly a k V k
.
NO,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T'IE ZONING MAP OF THE C17Y OF DENTON TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDIiiANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1 AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 111.710 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF WESTGATE HOSPITAL
AND MEDICAL CENTER, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET BEST OF THE INTERSTATE
HIGHWAY 35 NORTH SERVICE ROAD, AND ADJACENT AND EAST OF THE
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD, AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION
TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL "L1" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIG-
NATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HERESY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the toning classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-wits
Al) that certain 111.710 acre tract or parcel of land situated in
the B.B.B. & C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract Number 141, and in the R.
Whitlock Survey, Abstract Number 1403, Denton County, Taxes; said
tract being part of a tract shown by deed to W. W. Marshall,
recorded in Volume 416, Page 600, Deed Records Denton County,
Texas, and being more particularly described as foh ows:
BEGINNIL'G for the northwest corner of this tract at a fence corner
post, said corner is the northwest corner of said Marshall tract;
THENCE south 89°51'30" east a distance of 1961.87 feet a point for
corner in Denton city limits line, said point is 600 feet south-
westerly from the right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 35, for
the northeast corner of this tract;
THENCE south 03°39'47" east parallel to Interstate Highway 35 a
distance of 2648.36 feet to a point for R:he southeast corner of
this tract;
THENCE south 89°58'42" west 1346.13 feet to an iron pin in the
northeast right-of-way of A.T. & S.R. Railroad, for the southwest
corner of this tract;
THENCE north 33°02' west with said right-of-way a distance of
94.68 feet to an iron pin for the beginning of a curve to the
right having a radius of 9091.23 feet;
THENCE northwesterly wiath said curve a distance of 254.27 feet
(chord bearing north 33 17'16" west) to an iron pin for the and of
said curve;
THENCE northwesterly with another curve to the right havie ■
radius of 6800.60 feet (chord bearing north 25°46 37" westf a
distance of 1324.91 feet to an iron pin, the end of curve, for a
corner of this tract;
THENCE north 00°54'39" west a distance of 1165.47 feet to point of
beginning and containing 111.710 acres of land.
Z-1712/WALTER DERONDE/PACE 1
n r < ° ~ ' :i•... e ~ c,-, r r.4 ' r ~kr J t r v ~ ~ x,r ,w as c r,.
a
ie hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification
and Use designation to Light Industrial "L1" District Classifica-
tion and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance
of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION It.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
dsy of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the
same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classifica-
tion and Use subject to tho above conditions and specifications.
SECTION Ill.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of prcmoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of tho district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human livas, and edcouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION IV.
That this ordinance sh^li be in full force and effect
immediately after its assage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, HATOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CRAiLa7"1 ,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY +
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:-'% &L 'L' , 'I I) ,%v- I
i
1
i
Z-1712/HALTER DERONDE/PAGE 2
y
.~_s~CYn« sx . { H ;,q In t e.w. yl ~r a .:x. d ~h F_ t J.i ,l. a y'~, n{ J: ~~1 P1 ~•L:.
P 6 3 Minutes
January 21 1935
Page 3
• I. Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites
or areas which are eligible for preservation accord-
inq to a plan based on architectural, historic or
cultural motif.
2. Exemplification of the cultural, economic, social,
ethnic or historical heritage of the city, state
or United States.
3. Identification rlth a person or persons who
significantly contributed to the culture and
developmect of the city, state or United States.
4. A building or structure that because of its loca-
tion has become of value to a neighborhood, com-
munity area or the city.
Mrs. Barg stated that she agrees with staff's statements.
Her feeling is that other old buildings should not be
torn down, that in order to preserve downtown it is
necessary to remodel. She saii she wants to preserve
her children's heritage, she wants them to see ;'_?t
buildings.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte moved to recommend approval of H-34 stating
that he agrees with Mr. Miller that building is not like
it was but feels that approval is justified. He quoted
from ordinance which defines historic landmark as any
building, etc. which the City Council determines shall
be protected, enhanced and preserved in the interest of
the people. Seconded by Mr. Sidor.
Chairman said in this particular case he feels there is
some justification for designation, that the original
tin ceiling and brick walls nave been retained. He said
he agrees with Mr. LaPorte.
Vote was called and motion carried (5-1). Mr. Pearson
v^voted no.
S.r Z-1712. This is the petition of Walter DeRonde
requesting the estaolishment of light industrial (LI)
zoning on a 111.7 acre tract in the B.B.S. and C.R.R.
Company Survey, Abstract 141, and the R. Whitlock
Survey, Abstract 1403. The tract is located north of
Westgate Hospital and Medical Center, approximately
600 feet west of the Interstate Highway 35 north sekvice
road, and adjacent and east of the Atchison, Topeka and
Santa Pe Railroad. Annexation procedures are currently
underway on this tract.
Ms. Spivey said that eight notices were mailed to
property owners) no reply forms were received in
favor or in opposition.
Charles Watkins, representing the petitioner, stated
that this 111 acre tract abuts cc.rent city limits: that
annexation and light industrial jning is requested. He
said that Mr. DeRonde owns the majority of the land, that
two other owners have joined him in the request. He said
light industrial exists to north, south and east of this
tract, that railroad to located to west. Ere said rail-
road is located above ground level and is the logical
stopping point for industrial toning. Westgate Hospital
is located to the south and the nearest concentration of
residential is Ranch ;states, He said they feel the
site has potential for a variety of land uses and they
feel light industrial zoning is appropriate because of
the location on the railroad and I-35.
P i a Minutes
January 2, 1985
Page 4
No one spoke in opposition to request.
Ms. Spivey continued staff report stating that property
is located in both a moderate and a high intensity area;
that northern portion of property is located in the I-35E
and North Loup 288 center and southern portion is located
in a moderate area which is under the intensity standard
for the area, She said that Denton Thoroughfare Plan
shows that the northern extension of Loop 288 will pass
just north of this site. Staff feels request is compat-
ible and recommends approval.
On question, Mr. Clark said that drainage concerns and
location of streets and sidewalks would be handled dur-
ing the platting stage.
Petitioner offered no rebuttal.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Chairman stated that he has no objection to light indus-
trial but he does have a problem with an ordinance that
p'rrmits multi-family housing in light industrial areas.
He said ne opposes light industrial zoning and would
prefer a PD.
Mr. Pearson commented that he supports idea of petitioner
that they would support more than one type of land use.
He said he feels that if daveloper puts multi-family
units next to light Industrial, it would be developer's
concern. He said he thinks light industrial zoning
would be best use of property.
Mr. Sidor agreed with Mr. Pearson and said he feels
light industrial toning would be appropriate.
Mr, Sidor moved to recommend approval of Z-1712.
Seconded by Mr. Peason and carried (5-1).
fir. Claiborne voted no.
C. Z-1716. This is the petit::~n of Melvin Uouge lrealtor),
representing Lela Sparkman (owner), requesting a change
in the current zoning classification from agricultural
(A) to office (0) on a tract of 2,5 acres situated south
of and abutting U. S. Highway 380, east of Egan Road,
and being the most southern portion in the southwest
corner of the Thomas Egan Survey, Abstract 1406. If
approved, the said tract of land may be used for any of
the purposes permitted in the zoning ordinance of the
City of Denton.
Mr. Persaud said that one notice was mailed to prip-
erty owner, no reply forme were received in favor or
In opposition.
Melvin Gouge, builder, stated he is requesting change to
office zoning in order to build a small one story office
building for Dr. Thacker, that parking will be provided.
No one spoke in opposition to request.
Mr. Persaud continaol staff report stating that property
is apparently located within flood plain or floodwdyyI,
that an engineering study during platting process will
determine finisned floor elevation of building, He said
the area is located within a moderate activityy center
which is largelyy undeveloped and toned agticulturaly that
proposed use will generate approximately 875 total inten-
sity tripe. The Development Guide allows for flexibility
°°t f A b lie ' r~~
DATA: 03/19/85
CITY COUNCM RKtQRT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM,. 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ADOPTION FOR Z-1117
g Cg__OM~ixNDATtO1(:
The city council considered this item at its meeting of February 5,
1985 and voted to approve the planned development with conditions.
SUMMARY d
This was a request for a change from the agricultural (A) district
to the plannod development (PD) classification for light industrial
use on a 94 acre tract located on the east side of Mayhitl Road
approximately 1,600 feet south of FM 426 (E. ilcKinney St.).
BICKCROUND:
This site is located in a high intensity area where little or no
control of intensity is proposed. The coning is consistent with
Denton Development Guide policy of prohibiting residential
development within 2,500 feet of the Wastewater Treatment Plan..
PR . DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable.
F _SC AL_IMPACT :
There is no impact on thn general fund.
kespect 11 ubmi to
a
0. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Aq•• '4 a LL~
jjj Dni a Spi eJ y
Urban Planner
App ve
deEf Me
Director of Planning
and Cosounity Development
t078a
ti 1N5 M 1 y-rC L
~f' 1ST . a
' ~'1 4 `F 3~`• 1{ 9 w iF F "F ff t ~f, p J aF ' G
1~131L '
NO.
AN O;DINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING HAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1 AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 94.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE. EAST SIDE OF MAYHILL
ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1600 FEET SOUTH OF F.H. 426 (EAST MCKINNEY
STREET), AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEaEIN; TO PROVIDE FOR
A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD"
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
"Ll" USES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFVECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAIN3:
SECTION
That the zoning classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-wit:
All that certain tract of land situated in the Gideon Walker
Survey, Abstract No. 1330 Denton County, Texas and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING for the northwest corner of the herein described tract
at the northwest corner tract described in the deed to Capsyn
Limited Number 1280 recorded in Volume 767, Page 197 of the Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas and being in Hayhill Road about
160 feet south of the northwest corner of the said Gideon Walker
Survey;
THENCE easterly with the north line of the said tract a distance
of 1418.6 feet, more or less, to a northwest corner of the tract
described in the deed to Fredrick Beasley recorded in Volume 1054,
Page 889 of the said Deed Records;
THENCE southerly with the west line of the said tract a distance
of 223.8 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner thereof;
THENCE easterly with the south line of the said tract a distance
of 438.5 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner thereof in
the middle of Pecan Creek;
THENCE southeasterly with Pecan Creek and the east %ine of the
said Capsyn Limited tract about 1780 feet to the north northeast
corner thereof;
THENCE southerly leaving Pecan Creek a distance of 29.5 feet, more
or less, to the southeast corner of the Capsyn tract in the north
line of a private road;
THENCE westerly with the north line of the private road and the
south line of the said tract a distance of 2188.2 feet, more or
less, to the southerly southwest corner thereof;
THENCE northerly about 218 feet to the southeast corner of the
tract described in the dyed to James Pendleton recorded in Volume
1163, Page 163 of the said Deed Records;
THENCE westerly with a south line of the said Pendleton tract a
distance of 240 feet, more or loss, the southerly e6uthvest cornet
thereof,
2-1117/BURT SINGLETON/PAGE 1
5,'~„ 4 l 4~ ~4 a d. , vi' F't 7 r r i.i1Vx i Ai
THENCE northerly with a west line of the said tract a distance of
163.5 feet, more or leas, to a re-entrant corner thereof;
THENCE west with a south line of the said Pendleton tract a
distance of 200 fret, more or loss, to the westerly southwest
corner thereof and being in Mayhill Road;
THENCE northerly with the west line of the said We:r:t Survey and
along Hayhill Road about 1550 feet to the place of ginning and
enclosing approximately 94.3 acres of land.
is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification
and Use designation to Planned Development "PD" District Classi-
fication and Use designation for Light Industrial LI uses under
the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION It.
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of ■ny building within the planned development district, the
following conditions shall be matt
1. The following land uses shall not be permitted in the approved
planned development district "PD":
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
trick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dormitory, Boardin8g or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone, Clay or Gravel
Fairgounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
tiaulingg or Storegga Company
Heavy Machinery tales and Storage
Hcie for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvegga Yard for Rags or machinery, etc.
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Str.rage Yard
Residential
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
SECTION 111.
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made a part
s hereof for all purposes.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 1469, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69.10 be, and the
same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classifica-
tion and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
2.1117/BURT SINGLETON/PAGE 2
S y 'ry T `t' "'Y J ",aAll \ F 1'il'N 6 ~a ~..r Y
J ii" s 11
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the Iharacter of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and itc citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance :hall be in full force and effect
immediate'y after its passage and approval, the required ublic
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1985.
RICHARD 0. STLWnTj MAMK
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SEURITM
CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY,
e t \ 1» L~•i
Z•1117/BURT SINGLETON/PACE 3
Ile
z
0
CONCEPT PLAN Z-1717 z
ti
N
1 a~Al1►~ , M~
oil
•
•Y,
_ _ PRIVATE ROAD
< a ~a tl ,fi st'~.' e; J,. i_4+ rw- ,i } 'e~ .t,~h"K! c T i~.,~ •x
R,
P 6 Z Minutes
January 2, 1985
Page S
and diversity of land uses within a moderate intensity
area. The site is located within the control area of
the airport zoning ordinance) however, it is outside the
90 CNR noise contour and no sound control measures are
required, It is also outside approach zones so there is
no restriction on building height. Staff recommends
approval subject to provisions contained in airport
zoning ordinance.
Petitioner offered no rebuttal.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte moved to recommend approval of t-1716 under
provisions contained in the airport zoning ordinance.
Seconded by Mr. Pearson and unanimously carried (6-0).
U. r i-1717. This is the petition of Burt Singleton
requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (11)
classification to the light industrial (LE) district on
an approximately 94.3 acre tract in the Gideon Walker
Survey, Abstract 1330. The property is located on the
east side of Mayhill Road approximately 1600 feet south
of FX 426 (East McKinney street) and is more particularly
described as 'tracts IF, 1F1, 1C, IA and IS of the Gideon
Walker Survey, Abstract 1330.
Ms. Spivey said that 16 notices were mailed to property
owners, no reply forms were received in favor or in
opposition.
Burt Singleton, petitioner, stated that he is purchasing
four tracts for purpose of developing. At the present
time eight homes and two mobile homes are located on
tract It that tract 2 contains one rental property)
that a house burned on tract 3 and there has been no
reconstructions that the 84 acre tract 4 is owned by
an investor. He said he feels light industrial use
+.s best use of property,
on question from Chairman, Mr. Singleton said he is
aware that staff is recommenling a planned development,
:hat he agrees that no residential use should be made
of property as it is located near the sewage treatment
plant. He also agrees with list of uses deleted from
light industrial classification. He said he understands
restrictions anJ agrees to abide oy them.
Brian Burke, engineer, said that approximately 20 acres
of property will remain in the flood plain, that he gave
that information to Mr, singleton and he recognizes the
problem. He slid they had also discussed those things
that would come up at time of development such as utili-
ties, perimeter street paving, water and sewer extension.
Frank Davila said he owns one of the tracts and is in
favor of rezoning. He said that Trammell Crow's devel-
opment is .cross the street and he feels Industrial
development is appropriate. de said he is happy the
city is exercising control over all development in the
city.
Jim Felton stated he is in favor of request.
L. L. Wilkerson stated he owns property to south and
feels that if this property is zoned light industrial
it will help him.
No one spoke in opposition to request,
P S t Minutes
January 2, 1985
Page 6
Ms. Spivey continued staff report stating this is a high
intensity area, that little or no control is proposed
for high intensity centers. She said that property is
adjacent to wastewater treatment plant and Development
Guide specifically states that there should be no resi-
dential development within 2,500 feet of plant and dis-
courages residential development 2,500 to 4,000 feet
from the plant, In addition, utilities department
recommends teat the area within 2,500 feet of plant be
utilized for industrial purposes. She said that staff,
after evaluating the request, recommends approval of a
PD rather than straight light industrial zoning to allow
attachment of conditions to control land use adjacent to
wastewater treatment plant.
Mr. Pearson asked about expanding Mayhill Road and
Ms. Spivey said that petitioner has agreed to dedicate
right-of-way it appropriate time. Mr. Pearson asked if
it will be handled all at one time and response was that
each property owner is responsible for his piece, that
it is either done at that time or bond or escrow por-
tions. Mr. Pearson said his concern is whether trans-
portation lanes are adequate.
Mr. Clark advised that property owner would be respon-
sible for his property and city would pick up additional
needed for oversize. He said that offsite improvements
may be needed.
Petitioner offered no rebuttal.
Chairman asked if there were any questions and Richard
Moon, Route 7, Box 48, responded stating he lives across
from Mr. Wilkerson. He said that since being annexed
into city electricity and water have been provided but
sewer system is a concern. He said he would like to see-
all of area developed but don't need development if don't
have sewer facilities,
Mr. Ellison responded stating that it wuuld be property
owner's responsibility to connect to facilities as devel-
opment occurs or facilities are provided with CIP funds.
At. Wilkerson said raw sewage is running into creek at
present time, that he would like the sewer problem taken
care of before any new development.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte moved to recommend approval of 2-1717 as
a planned development (PD) for light industrial uses
with the condition that the following land uses will
be prohibited in the approved PDs
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
lormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
pump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
00-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatche y, poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
74
e c . 4 ham, ~1 _a d~i, r ~a rt... fe .)r x 4r v
' a
P & 2 minutes
January 2, 1985
Page 7
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or
Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for Ra s or Machinery etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Residential
Rodeo Grounds
Sand Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of furniture or Appliances
Outside a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (6-0).
E. Recommend
18 and 19.
Mr. Persaud stated that as site is zoned residential
(SF-10), 46 notices *rare mailed to property owners in
receding subdivision in compliance with state law.
8ne reply form was returned in favor, five reply forms
were returned in opposition.
He continued that property is located at corner of
Nottingham Drive and Churchill Drive that it is a
replat of three lots; that purpose of the replat is
to shift existing lot lines to accommodate a building
which currently exists on the site.
Mr. LaForte referred to reply forms in opposition and
advised that property owners in the area had cont►,cted
:aim concerning the state of corner lot where dirt had
been removed for fill for middle lot, leaving a large
hole; also, they werrpee concerned about developer's heavy
Heasked equipment that tearing laws ubs street
people are objecting to.
Mr. Persaud said that a garage was added on, that there
was not enough space; that replat was requested to shift
lot line away from that building.
Ilr. Clark advised that the city's one building inspector
exactly difficulty
as u they should be controlling since survey stakeseare ined
d V erent locations and many times are knocked down by
cor.~truction.
Mr. Sidor questioned what would happen if plat was not
approved since this is after the fact.
Don Lynch, petitioner representing his father who is
the builder, stated they had had three surveys dotia on
the property, that no pins existed on property, that
they had problems with city plats as bearings veto off
and there were no markings, He said that as a condition
of sale a request was made to enclose garage and add a
DOEt 03/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council Z/1 ro
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ADOPTION FOR Z-1720
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council considered this item at its meeting of February 5,
1985 and voted to approve the zoning change.
SUMMARY:
This was a request for a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the general retail (GR) district on a 2.9 acre
tract in the Stephen Nembrie Survey, located at the northeast corner
of Robinson Road and Teasley Lane (FM 2181).
BACKGROUND:
This originally designated moderate area was redesignated by the
realignment of Loop 288. The City Council approved Z-1720 due to
the above factor.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT%
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respectfully submitte
•
0. C fir re a u g
City t+.anager
Prepared by-.
d1~QAl~~1
Denise Spivby
Urban Planner
App V
Jeff Msya
Director of Planning
and Coms►unity Development
1078&
g, 1
3
104L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1 AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 2.989 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
R03INSON ROAD AND F.H. 2181 (TEASLEY LANE), AND IS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND
USE DESIGNATION TO GENERAL RETAIL "GR" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND
USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the zoning classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-vit.
All that certain 2.989 acre tract or parcel of land situated in
the Stephen Hembrie Survey, Abstract No. 643, Denton County,
Texas; said tract being part of a called 88.806 acre tract shown
by deed to Lakewood Estates Partnership, recorded in Volume 1172,
Page 318, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas, and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING for the southwest corner of this tract at an iron pin at
the intersection of the north right-of-way of Robinson Road and
the east right-of-way of Farm to Market Road 2181, (Teasley Lane)
said iron pin is north 01°07'29" west 35.53 feet from the
southwest corner of Lake Estates Mobile Home Park, recorded in
Volume C, Page 193, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas;
THENCE north 01°01'29" west with said east right-of-way line a
distance of 294.98 feet to an iron pin the beginning of a curve to
thg left having a radius of 1471.57 feet (chord bearing north
03 07'23" west, 98.86 feet);
THENCE northwesterly with said right-of-way and said curve a
distance of 98.88 feet to an iron pin;
THENCE north 78°02'07" east with a screening fence a distance of
218.80 feet to an iron pin for an angle corner of this tract;
THENCE south 61°32'01" east with a screening fence a distance of
123.77 feet to an iron pin for an angle corner of this tract;
THENCE south 01°44'24" west with a screening fence a distance of
390.00 feet to an iron pin in said north right of way of Robinson
Road for the southwsst corner of this tract;
THENCE north 88°07'26" west with said north right of way a
distance of 300.00 feet to point of beginning.
is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification
and Use designation to General Retail "GR" District Classification
and Use designation under the comprehensive toning ordinance of
the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION 11.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 1969, to an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
Z-1720/R. J. BUTTON/PAGE I
PA 1,'~! i s q u
.
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-19 be and the
same is hereby amended to show such change in District Ciassifica-
tion and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of Marchs 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, KAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLM CITY SECKETM
CITY OF DENTON,sTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
r
1
Z•1720/R. J. SUTTON/PACE 2
P a Z Minutss
January 16, 1995
Page 3
to disrupt the flow of traffic cn this major thorough-
fare. Parkway has been designee for residential
access and curb cuts on that side would encourage
undestreable site design and traffic flow.
On question from Mr. LaPorte, Mr. Ellison stated he
did not know how long the Red Cross had been using
their current facilities as an office. He added it
could have been since prior to 1969.
On question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Persaud stated yes,
office zoning would generate more traffic than multi-
family. He gave the generation trips per day for both.
On question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Clark stated Carroll
Boulevard as is, is as large as has been projected.
Mr. Ellison stated the Development Guide does allow
for selected nodes to be developed for multi-family
and office development subject to certain site con-
ditions. He stated the office at Congress and Carroll
Boulevard was approved by City Council with smaller
setbacks and it is too close to the other residents in
the area.
Mr. Uland in rebuttal, stated the garage shown in the
pictures he distributed, will be removed which will
allow for more parking. The curb cut is 40 feet from
the corner of Parkway and there is no visibility ob-
struction to his knowledge. He stated homes built in
the 20's and 30's are beautiful homes and are worth
preserving and stated he would hate to tear it down,
rather he would like to spend more to fix it up.
On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Uland stated yes,
the main ingress - egress would be Carroll Boulevard.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Pearson stated if we continue to permit additional
office and commercial development on Carroll Boulevard,
it will increase the traffic.
Mr. LaPorte commented he feels it is unfair to
Mr. Ultnd as there already exists office zoning in
the areal however, since further office and commercial
development in this area is discouraged, he intends
to vote against the petition.
Mr. Sidor commented he feels this would threaten
further development of office and commercial on
Carroll Boulevard and he intends to vote against
the proposal.
Mr. Escue made a motion to deny Z-1719. Seconded by
Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (7-0),
B.rtZ-1720. This is the petition of R, J. Button request-
Tnq a change in zoning from Specific Use Permit 166
(Lake-wood Estates Mobile Home Park) to the general
retail OR) zoning district on a 2,9 acre tract
situated in the Stephen Hembrie Survey, Abstract 643.
The property is located at the northeast corner of
Robinson Road and FM 2161 (Teasley Lane).
Ms, Spivey stated there were three reply fosse mailed
to property ownerst 2 were returned in favor and zero
in opposition.
P i Z Minutes
January 16, 1985
Page 4
Mr. R. J. Button, owner of the tract, distributed a
brochure to tfe commission and he stated has been
printed for a couple of years prior to the construc-
tion of Lakewood Estates, which included the 2.9 acre
proposal. He stated six months ago or to er, this
area was classified as medium intensity and the boun-
dary was moved back to Hickory Creek and has now been
Chang d to low intensity. Mr. Archer, who owns the
property across from his, came in with a request for
retail zoning and it was approved. He stated he wasn't
aware the area was going to change or he would have
come in before Mr. Archer and rezoned his property. He
continued in Phase I of Lakewood Estates, we extended
an 8 inch water line from Ryan Road to service the
development in Phase 1. Then in Phase II, extended it
to service Phase It. He added since he has extended
the water line, it has opened up the whole area. He
stated if denied. he doesn't know what could be done
to that corner lot, as it is zoned for mobile homes.
He stated he was proposing to put in a cleaners and/or
a convenience store.
Mr. Sidor asked, when the specific use permit was
applied for to allow a mobile home park, if he
• proposed general retail for that corner.
Mr. Button stated he did not as he didn't feel the
need to develop it as general retail at that time. It
was in the country.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Ms. Spivey stated this site is located in a low in-
tensity area. She added the intensity standard for
the area is not violated due to the lack of total
development in the area. The Denton Development Guide
has a policy limiting retail concentrations in low
intensity areas to four acres. These concentrations
can be separated by one half mile or one half the in-
tensity area length. She stated in October 1984, the
Planning and Zoning Commission approved a 31 acre mixed
use planned development at the southwest corner of
Teasley Lane and Ryan Road. This site contains four
acres of general retail zoning on the corner. Since
these sites are within one half mile of each other,
there will be a total of seven acres of general retail
zoning in this area if this request is approved. She
added at first glance, denial seems to be the obvious
recommendation but several other issues should be
considered.
She continued, the afore mentioned four acres of
retail zoning has been approved by the Planning and
Zoning Commission but has not yet gone to the City
Council because annexation is not yet complete on this
tractt so the zoning is not technically appproved. She
added Mr. Button has shown this tract as being reserved
fos retail purposes since the beginninngg of his entire
development. She stated at the time of his original
plan, the area was designated by the Development Guide
as a moderate intensity area because the southern
extension of Loop 288 was scheduled for that alignment,
The new alignment has been moved further south to
Hickory Creek Road and the moderate areas have been
shifted to that alignment. She state] Mr, Button in-
stalled the utilities that will make it possible for
Mr. Archer and others to develop in that area, It
seems hardly fair to deny him the use of those
utilities in developing his own property,
R.ti'~ti'
. ,
P i 2 Minutes
January 16, 1985
Page 5
In conclusion, Ms. Spivey stated if the Commission's
• decision is influenced strictly by the Development
Guide, you would recommend denial of this case, but
there are extenuating factors to to considered and
'those may influence your decision. In effect, staff
has no recommendation.
On question from Mr. Pearson, Ms. Spivey stated
perimeter street paving would apply on Robinson Road.
Mr. Button, in rebuttal, stated his only purpose in
presenting the brochure was to say that the reality of
life doesn't seem to turn out like you want it to. He
stated this case would technically get to City Council
before Mr. Archer's case then he wouldn't be violating
anything.
On question from Mr. Pea~!zn, Mr. Button stated he was
proposing a one story convenience store, cleaners and
maybe a take-out pitea establishment.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Button stated he has
84 acres and 410 lots and added his density is lower
than required.
Chair declared the public hearing closed. _
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of
2-1720 to change a 2.9 acre tract from agricultural
with a specific use permit allowing a mobile home
park to general retail. Seconded by Mr. Sidor.
Mr. LaForte commented that the Development Guide is
a guide and not a concrete plan. He added Mr. Button
has teen an asset to this community.
Mr. Sidor commented that he feels this area of 84
acres, with 410 lots, 2.9 acres of general retail is
not exorbitant.
Mr. Pearson stated he agrees with Mr. LaForte and
Mr. Sidor and he feels there will be a need for
general retail in this area.
Mr. Morris stated the wording on the agenda should
actually have been worded a change in toning from
agricultural (A) with a specific use permit allowing
a mobile home park to general retail (OR). He added
mobile home parks are not allowed in a generi,; retail
area.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Morris stated no, this
is not sin amendment to the specific use permit, but
just wanted to clarity the wording of the agenda.
L Vote oaas called and motion passed unanimously (7-0).
C. 21721. This is the petition of Alpha Joint Ventures
requesting a change in toning from the single family
(SF-7) district to the planned development (PD) classi-
fication on a 4.4 acre tract situated in the Alexander
Hill Survey, Abstract 623, The property is locatLA at
1213 Bernard Street. It approved, the planned develop-
ment will permit the construction of fifty-four (54)
townhome units,
u s
0l:1'B: 03/1/65
CITY COUNCIL, REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the CitY Counct1 0
FROK: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ADOPTION FOR Z-1721
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council considered this item at its meeting of February 5,
1985 and voted to approve the planned development.
SUMMARY:
This was a request for a change in zoning from the single family
(SF-7) district to the planned development (PD) classification on a
4.4 acre tract located at 1213 Bernard Street. The approved planned
development will permit the construction of 54 single family
attached units.
BACKGROUND,
This site is located in a low intensity area that is approximately
17% over the standard. The City Council voted to recommend approval
of Z-1721 as it represents a good faith effort to maintain the
residential character of the neighborhood,
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable.
FISCAL IKPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respectfully submitte
e
G. Chris Har un 4W4" 4CO
City Manager
Prepared bys
~eMld~ .(JJ1/_tM~
Denise Spi ey
Urb+n Planner
App ve
Jeff Noy
Director' of Planning
and Community Development
1078g
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOiTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1 f,ND AS SAID MAP APPLIES
TO 4.4275 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 1213 BERNARD STREET, AND IS HORS
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANCE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY "SF-7" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
AND USE DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF aHE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HERf.BY ORnAINS:
SECTION I.
That the toning classificetion and use designation of the
following described property, to-wit:
Being all certain tract or parcel of land situated in the City and
County o! Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the Alexander
Hill Survey, Abstract No. 623, and part of a certain 5 acre tract
of land conveyed by H. C. Davis, at el to 0. C. Davie, by deed
dated July 10, 19400 and shown of record in Volume 285, Page 529,
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING; at a point in the west boundary line of said survey and
in the west line of said 5 acre tract at the southwest corner of a
lot conveyed by L. G. Calhoun and wife to U. C. Stuart by deed
dated December 8, 1947 and shown of record in Volume 353, Page 1609
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, said corner being 60.00 feet
south of the northwest corner of said 5 acre tract;
THENCE east along the south line of said lot conveyed to G. C.
Stuart 125.00 feet to its southeast corner;
THENCE north 60.00 feet tc the southeast corner of said G. C.
Stuart's lot in the north line of said 5 acre tract;
THENCE east along the north line of said 5 acre tract, 661.10 feet
to the northeast corner of said 5 acre tract;
THENCE south along the east line of said 5 acre tract, 27).18 feet
to the southeast corner of said 5 &c ,.e tract;
THENCE west along amid 5 acre tract, 636.11 feet to the southeast
corner of a certain tract of land conveyed by L. 0. Calhoun and wife
to G. C. Stuart by deed dated December 8, 1947, and shown of record
in Volume 344, Page 486, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE north along the east line of said lot conveyed to G. C.
Stuart 60 feet past its northeast corner and the southeast corner
of a certain lot conveyed by L. 0. Calhoun and wife to 0. C. Otuart
by deed dated December 8, 1947 and shown of record in Volumr 345,
Page 5241 Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, ■nd continatn-
nort;: all 120.00 feet to the northeast corner of said lot conveyea
to 0. C. Stuart by deed dated December 8, 1941 shown of record in
Volume 345, Page 5240 Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE west along t%e north Itne of said lot 150.00 feet to its
northwest corner in the west boundary line of said survey;
Z•1721/ALPHA JOINT VENTURES/PACE 1
a
.
THENCE, north along the west bound+,ry line of said survey 97.78
feet to the place of beginning and containing 4.4275 acres
(192,863 sq. ft.) of land.
is hereby changed from Single-Family "SF-7" District Classifica-
tion and Use designation to Planned Development "PD" District
Classification and Uae designation under the comprehensive toning
ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made a part
hereof for all purposes.
SECTION III.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the
same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classifica-
tion and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications.
SECTION IV.
That the Citv Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City cf Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYU
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
TY'SECKE'1 RY
CITY OF DLUTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: . % 'll\
2.112;/ALPHA JOINT VENTURES/PAGE 2
~ tF
' Ii i~3S1 r. C.:Iliiwwl. ~ 1w L ~
IIIIIw--
I K1 M" Nov" so H flow
IIIII r C `~`s~ w~ww 1 HI SMUD O 111v1. M N OM
l
%A 4 M Ila Off
• ~f-+-1~ - .Iw.iiww.►..wwll/ relloM-~ 1 too ~ r
~ MI IllK.IM \«fLIR kalm"M~f A .I I
t--r--j
, y ...Y,. I /ewrrf101lwlarn ,
[~'J 1 f /M lfAl~ ~rC L1MtM1
~4 If->1~0 INIM\~/M I xIn 1MI "N11 f"rlffM/f OMU/11
O N - aw o m M • now ~ 1 f al .rr~~ ►+n an ar
H~ to - lRil 1 N 1! M a 1~,!!1 l"~-- \ ` leetw 9111110114111
1L f01A~ 'I"1w 4•+.wwwl. 1/u"a wN frlM M q" Ilwe
"'I" y `
4 On At ~;~]f • Iw ullr~w M M iwrr/ M H
Y wrwlonl.•
M~ "..1 II dHff~rlf~lr/~l~flfw
poevom 11 01MIN ~M ~I 0a Oft
.Mw,. n'r 1M1 - f1l~r w-r
M MM MAOl~ 11 r ~w 4NIwNMI
b 1!~ lMM~ W*M MOA
eMwIII><awn w-7
OMLON91- AMA J01NT vEN WNW
till
~w srr ewer ~
~rtt
P a 2 Minutes
Januaty 16, 1983
Page 5
In conclusion, Ms. Spivey stated if the Commission's
• decision is influenced strictly by the Development
Guide, you would recommend denial of this case, but
there are extenuating factors to be considered and
those may influence your decision. In effect, staff
has no recommendation.
On question from Mr, Pearson, Ms. Spivey stated
perimeter street paving would apply on Robinson Road.
Mr. Button, in rebuttal, stated his only purpose in
presenting the brochure was to say that the reality of
life doesn't seem to turn out like you want it to. He
stated this case would technically get to City Council
before Mr. Archer's case then he wouldn't be violating
anything.
On question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Button stated he was
proposing a one story convenience store, cleaners and
maybe a take-out pizza establishment.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Button stated he has
84 acres and 410 lots and added his density is lower
than required.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of
x-1720 to change a 2.9 acre tract from agricultural
with a specific use permit allowing a mobile home
park to general retail. Seconded by Mr. Sidor.
Mr. LaPorte commented that the Development Guide is
a guide and not a concrete plan. He added Mr. Button
has teen an asset to this community.
Mr. Sidor commented that he feels this area of 84
acres, with 410 lots, 2.9 acres of general retail is
not exorbitant.
Mr. Pearson stated he agrees with Mr. LaPorte and
Mr. Sidor and he feels there will be a need for
general retail in this area.
Mr. Morris stated the wording on the agenda should
actually have been worded a change in zoning from
agricultural (A) with a specific use permit allowing
a mobile home park to general retail (GR). He added
mobile home parks are not allowed in a general retail
area.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr, Morris stated no, this
is not an amendment to the specific use permit, but
just wanted to clarify the wording of the agenda.
Vote was called and motion passed unanimously (7-0).
C.i z1721. This is the petition of Alpha Joint Ventures
requesting a change in zoning from the single family
(SF-7) district to the planned development (PD) classi-
fication on a 4.4 acre tract situated in the Alexander
Hill Survey, Abstract 623. The property is located at
1213 Bernard Street, If approved, the planned develop-
ment will permit the construction of fifty-four (54)
townhome units.
P L 2 Minutes
January 16, 1985
Page 6
Ms. Spivey stated there were 23 reply forms mailed to
property owneis; four were returned in favor, one in
opposition and three in favor not on the mailing list.
Mr. Jack Diamond, representing Alpha Joint Ventures,
stated they are a group dedicated to constructing
single family homes. He stated he is in the process
of making Denton his home. He showed architects
drawings of the proposed homes (single family), and
stated they are not apartments and not built with
student housing in mind. He stated they are trying to
provide some breaks in elevation to show that they are
single family homes and added the planned development
they are requesting has quite a bit of green apace.
He continued, the proposed fits single family as
exists in the neighborhood and instills pride of
ownership and integrity of single family neighbor-
hood. He stated the homes will be owner occupied
and their current lending contract does not allow
them to sell more than 20 percent as renter property.
He stated the physical character lends low impact
to this area and the maximum height will to 24 feet.
He stated a planned development in excess of 12 units
would to considered multi-familyt he added they chose
to stay lower than this figure. He stated the homes
will be in the moderate price range and not high
priced. He stated they don't consider this spot
coning. He described the interior and exterior
amenities and floor plans.
Mr. Dan Allgiain, stated he is the second half of
Alpha Joint Ventures. He stated he feels having a low
profile will add to the nature of the development, as
the homes will barely be seen from the street. He
stated they have allotted 61,000.00 per unit for
landscaping and described the types of landscaping
proposed.
Itr. C.L. Hunt, an area property owner, stated even
though he is not crazy about this type of operation.
he is in favor of single family homes. He stated they
are asking for 54 units which is tasically a first
class operation and stated he is in favor of this as
opposed to 1,000 apartments or real small houses teing
built there. He rdded he has no objections and would
ask that the Commission approve this request.
Mr. Jose G. Irlas, an area property owner, stated he
did not receive a notice, but he is in favor.
No one spoke in opposition to the request,
Ms. Spivey continued this tract to in a low intensity
area that Is already over the standard. She stated
based on the ex sting zoning intensity area, it is 17
percent over the standard. This change will serve to
aggravate this situation. She stated one of the Denton
Development Guide's policies is protection of existing
older netghborhoods and housing stock and that low to
moderate income people should have protection of their
quality of life as well as protection from traffic,
noise, privacy and property values. She added this
area is in our target area for Community Development
Block Grant Funds and a property owns. the lot to the
north of this tract, is a candidate for one of the
first rehabs in the city, She added this is evidence
that some of these structues and the netghborhood are
salvageable, She stated this is medium densit concen-
tration housing and the Development Guide requires at
. w
P 6 Z Minutes
January lb, 1985
Page 7
least one access by a collector street. Bernard is a
residential street loaded to capacity. She stated im-
provements would be required to a portion of Bernard
Street. Since the proposed is inconsistent with afore
mentioned Development Guide policies, staff recommends
denial of 2-1721.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Ms. Spivey stated widening
Bernard another lane all the way to 1-35E, is one type
of improvement that has been discussed.
Mr. Clark, in response to questions from Mr. Sidor,
stated there is not enough right-of-way to widen
Bernard. He stated staff is trying to bring out the
fact that Bernard is not an arterial but a residential
street and the traffic level is at capacity and until
improvements are made, streets won't handle the
traffic.
Mr. olyai stated a study done previous to another
zoning case in this area, has shown to be over the
capacity.
On question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Rumfield stated yes,
the developer would to required to run a sanitary
sewer line to this development and he is aware of this
requirement.
Mr. Ellison stated the petitioners have tried to keep
from exceeding the minimum requirement as far as
density.
Mr. Diamond in rebuttal, stated his experience has
always been, good quality construction does not dis-
courage renovation in any area.
Mr. Allgiain stated Bernard Street does carry a lot of
traffic, but according to surveys they had done they
are not over the generation trips allowed. He con-
tinued they are in a low intensity area and that 20
percent of the area is developed multi-family. He
added with the setbacks and elevation differential we
show, this makes this potentially lower. He stated
regarding widening Bernard Street, we honestly can't
afford to do it. He stated it is his understanding
that SF-7 requires 7,000 square feet per lot and we
don't feel we are affecting the traffic that much.
On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Allgiain stated
yes, this is probably as low as we can go with the
density, considering the amount of sewer improvements
that have to be done, we could drop a little bit, a
few units maybe.
On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Pumfield stated
yes, developer would have to install the sewer line
from Fort North Drive and he would be entitled to pro
rata.
Chairman declared the public hearing closed.
Chairman Claiborne made a motion to deny Z-1121.
Seconded by Mr, Escue.
Mr, Pearson commented this is one of those types of
requests that is hard to make a decision on. He
P a 2 Minutes
January 16, 1985
Page 8
stated they have made some good points and these lots
are not likely to develop as single family lots. He
added he intends to vote for the proposal.
Mr. LaForte commented he was going to vote for it.
Vote was called and motion failed 3-4. (Ms. Cole, Mr.
LaPorte, Mr. Pearson and Mr. Sidor voted no.)
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of
2-1721. Seconded ty Mr. Pearson and vote carried
4-3. (Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Escue and Mr. Juren voted
no.)
1V. Lonsiderattons
A. Approval of final plat of the Kelsoe Addition, Block
It Lot 1.
Mr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 1.409 acres
situated east of and abutting Bell Avenue at the Bell
Avenue and Mingo Road intersection. This site is toned
light industrial and retail development is anticipated.
He stated water, sanitay sewer, electric, telephone
and solid waste services and facilities are adequate
and available. He stated there was one problem with
reference to right-of-way for Mingo Road, but after
discussion with the City Attorney, he informed staff
the procedures for that would be handled in a different
way. Staff recommends approval of the final plat.
Mr. Escue made a motion to approve the final plat
of the Kelsoe Addition, Block 1, Lot 1. Seconded by
Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (7-0).
B. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the Extension
to the Saule Addition, Block 1, Lots 8 and 9.
Mr. Pereaud stated this is a tract of 0.9017 acres sit-
uated east of and abutting Sault Lane, and north of
Roberts Street. The site is toned residential single
family (SF-7) and the preliminary plat is to create
two single family SF-7 lots. He stated there is a
need for perimeter street paving along Saute Lane and
we ate recommending the developer to make the improve-
ments, which is about one half of the street. The
question of a waiver is for the Commissions consider-
ation.
Mr. Sidor asked if the developer is requesting a waiver
rather than postponement. Mr. Persaud stated the
developer is requesting 5 waiver, however, according
to the regulations, the Commission can waive or post-
pone the requirements.
Mr. Sidor asked how long would it be postponed, and
would he be required to post a performance bond for 10
years,
Mr. Clark state< for several reasons, it is better to
require the improvements rather than postponement or
waiver.
Mr, Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat of the Sault Addition, Lots 8 and 9,
Block l and not to waive or postpone, but to require
the developer to make perimeter street paving
requirements, Motion was seconded,
11411 .;f t 41
DATE: 03/19/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO, Mayor and Members of the City Council 140
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ADOPTION FOR Z-1724
RECOM ENDATION:
The City Council considered this item at I't's meeting of February 19,
1985 and voted to approve the planned development with conditions.
SUMMARY:
This was a request for a change in zoning from the single family
(SF-10) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a
19.8 acre tract located on the east side of Hinkle Drive between
Denton Center and Good Samaritan Village. The approved development
will permit the construction of a retirement campus with 67 units of
single family attached housing, 183 units of multi-family housing
and a 60 bed health care facility.
B&CKGROUNDt
The site is located in a low intensity area and the approved
development will not violate the standard for the area. The site
plan for the development insures that green space will be maintained
and the residential character of the area will be preserved.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respectfully submitted:
G. r s g
City Manager
Prepared by:
Dents* Spivlsy 0
Urban Planner
App ved~
Jeff mole
Director-of Plian ng
and Community Development
1078g
1027E
t
NO.
j AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES
TO 19.8454 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HINXLE DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY $00 FEET NORTH OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE (U.S. HIGHWAY
380)9 AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A
CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY "SF-10"
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
"PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the zoning classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the R. Beaumont
Survey, Abstract No. 31, City and County of Denton, Texas, being
ppart of a (called) 42.07 acre tract described in a deed from Sidney
Brandenberger to Crawford Building Corporation on June 13, 1955 and
recorded in Volume 411, Page 491, Deed Records of said County, and
being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a cross-tie fence corner post set in concrete at the
northeast corner of said 42.07 acre tract;
THENCE south 0°54' west along and near a fence on the east boundary
line of said 42.97 acre tract 871.15 feet to a 2-inch steel fence
post set in concrete;
THENCE north 88°41'50" -just 993.73 feet to a steel pin on the east
boundary line of Hinkle Drive;
THENCE north 1°18'10" east with the east boundary line of Hinkle
Drive 814.10 feet to a steel pin on the north boundary line of said
42.07 acre tract;
THENCE south 88°31'30" east along and near a fence on the north
boundary line of said 42.07 acre tract 987.61 feet to the place of
beginning and containin,, in all 19.8454 acres of land.
is hereby changed from Single-Family "SF-10" District Classifica-
tion and Use designation to Planned Development "P D" District
Classification and Use designation under the comprehanstve zoning
ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION It.
e
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of any building within the planned development district, the
following conditions shall be mats
1. Tito property shall be developed in accordance with the
approved site plan.
2. The single family attached structures shall be no tore
than one story in height.
I
3. The trees along the western property line shall be
retained as a screening device.
SECTION 111.
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made a part
hereof for all purposes.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the
same is hereby amended to show such change in District
Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and
specifications.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the ggeneral welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonabte consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be in fall force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1985.
RICHARD , r
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
Z-1724/DAVID L. SPALDING/PAGE 2
Z.Jf`i -le MINY. Plane" IH.dngse.l
rill
r.e~.1.~.► -
~IeeM~.ll J L..~f t
$ll•
inn,
f 1
1 ..r
N .S .1 ~c
*-1 ileole 4sd1 lee,N ~ i I f I1.I..y Lee
Ito.
cunn MAP
• L
. r ~ ♦ Agle le~lh !sues
lMw Y111IIM4.w w. 4M~1. .J 11 ~~11II Ill! ~
ftd~m low 6"
x ' s I C _
Whit,
w l
LL IM.I IY.YIy .M.Ii lrll
If •..w. ..elly YM.I'1NIY.F1 NM ' • ~ 11~ _
fad lad At" If Nl1 sere!
f ON D ho"No, weed single leudp
Ce»ul EVCLOPIdENT bled 2ee1ng PLAN
~ ■ u M~ ~~«ywr r r f
`~WI~My1yv~llf~~.ieyM■~yvailfiei
PARTMUMWP
epo.
1
4' . h. t ♦h / Js .o raa.
- ,r. f r.
414
P 6 'L Minutes
January 30, 1985
Page 8
Mc. Jackson stated Mr. Smith did contact him and scow
him the plans and then later came back with cev►sea
plans, but said he feels it is just too dense and too
hard to adjust one's thinking from SP-10 cc multi-family
zoning. He suggested talking to the of^er neighbors and
maybe get, together as a group.
Ms. Cornell asked is there anything else that could be
developaa there, since there Seems to be such a gap
between SF-10 and multi-famiiy, that will be devetopea
as the site plan shows.
Mr. Escue ansiered no, not since this is straignt zoning.
Cnair declared the luolic nearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte mace a motion to aeny 2-172J. Seconaeo uy
Mr. Sidor and carried 5-i. i0r. Pearson voted no.)
Mc. Sidor couunenteo that even it it was permissable to
have submitted a FU for townhouse develo pnent, ne would
not tie in favor of it as it would not be )n keeling with
the integrity of the neighoocnooa.
U. r A-024. This is the petition of Uavia Spalding,
representing Real-Tech, requesting a change in zoning
from the single family (SF-10) district to the planned
develo Anent (PD) classification on 3 19.8 acre tract in
the R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31. The property is
located on the east side or Hinkle Drive approximately
800 feet north of University Drive (U. S. Highway 3bU).
it approved, the planned development will permit the
development of a retirement campus witn the following
land uses:
Single Family Attaches - tj units on 9.5 acres
with a density of 7 units per acre
Multi-Family - 183 units on 5.7 acres
with a density of 32 units per acre
deaitn Care Facility - 60 bed facility on 1.3 acres
Ms. Spivey stated there were 17 relay forms maiieu to
property owners; three were in favor and zero in
opposition and two undecided.
Uave Spalding of Real Tech, a development company or.
Arlington .:escrioed the surcounoing land area.
Stan Haas, an architect of Dallas, explained ano snowed
slices of a retirement campus similar to the one
proposea. He stated the main access as snuwn on the
site plan has seen moved to the middle of the develop-
ment and they vill provide sidewalks.
Charles Starnes, ;oxisulting engineer with Starnes a,iu
Associates in Arlington, stated tie is pert owner of this
property. He stated in dealing with this site, ne ran
acros3 tree problem of Pecan Creek running through the
back of the property, but, we feel we have taken a major
problem and turned it into an asset and a beautiful Olen
area. He stated they are proposing a detention lino and
have discussed the plans with the engineering depart-
rtent. He stated he had met with the manager of the i;ood
Samaritan and the manager said they have been hampered
to future development but by these improvements we are
proposing to the creek, it will help their future
davelopments He added on a national basis, most
ce:irement campuses of this nature, nave one vehicle or
leas and would not generate a lot of traffic.
P i 2 Minutes
January 30, 1965
Page 9
• Mr. Spalding stated they had had a meeting of 42 of the
area homeowners and most seemed to oe acceptable to the
proposal. He stated they are going to leave the tree
line along Hinkle Drive. He stated the residents would
be an average of 65 years or older, ana we found in our
survey rent would be from $800 to $1,000 rental or en-
dowment type plan would oe ottered which would include
one meal a day. He explained the amenities and sur-
rounding facilities available.
No one spoke in opposition to the request.
Ms. Spivey stated this site was the subject of a zoning
change request from the single ramily sr-10 eistrict to
planned development classification in i9bl. Tne
aevelopers proposed 240 multi-family units and 32 units
on a 19.8 acre tract. The request was approved by the
Planning and Zoning commission but denied by the City
Council aue to strong neignbornooa oppositLon. She
stated the petitioners in this case are requesting
planned develoizent (PO) for a retirement campus. She
stated the Denton Development Guide designates low
intensity areas as the city's primary housing areas.
Diversified land use and small scattered sites of
apartments (less than 20 units) are permitted as long
as 1) there is strict site plan control within one block
of existing low density residential so that the char-
acter of the area can be maintained; 2) traffic planning
insures &ccess by a collector street or iaryer and
traffic does not flow through local streets; 3) the
overall density/intensity stanaard is not violated; 4)
sufficient green space and recreational facilities are
provided and 5) there is input into planning by the
neighborhood. She continued the proposal is well within
the intensity standaru. The developer has met witn the
neighborhood and appears to nave taKen their concerns
into convideration. kneretore, since this proposai is
consistent with Development uutie policies, staff
recommends approval or z-1714 with conditions.
Mr. Spalding said the type of people would oe elderly
ana the property would be maintenance free for them.
He stated extra measures nave been taKen such as a guard
house to the entrance of the property, to prevent
crime. He stated there will not be a lot of traftic,
therefore there is not a lot of neea for parking, in
most cases less than one car per unit.
Chair declared the public nearing closes.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of L-1724
with the following conditions:
1) Tne property shall be developed in accordancer with
the approved site plan.
x
2) The single family attached strictures snail be no
more than )ne story in height.
` 3) Tne trees along the western property line snail oe
re+.ained as a screening device.
Mr. Sioor seconded the motion and carried unanimously
(6-0).
1 L '
P 6 Z Minutes
January 30, 1985
Page 10
Mr. Juren commehteo he wished more developers would talk
to the neighbors as these have done.
Mr. Sidor commented tnis is an ideal location and it is
not likely we would have furtner develo puent of resioen-
Ltial nouses there.
Mr. Juren left the meeting.
H. xecor%nend approval of final replat of Cooper Crossing,
Section 1.
:dr. Persaud stateo this is a tract of approximately
61.5y acres situated east of and abutting Hercules
Lane. Thrs s.tte is zoned residential single family
under planned c:evelopment district IPD-72). The
original plat contained an over-provision of easements
whim would not allow adequate building area on some
lots. Tne replat will rationalize the provision of
easements on the site. The final replat conforms to
the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and
Land Develo puent Regulations and staff recommends
approval.
Brian Burke stated he is the engineer on the project
representing the owner and is here to answer any
questions.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Chair declared the public nearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of the
final re plat of Cooper Crossing, section I. Seconded oy
Ms. Cole end unanimously carried (5-0).
P. Recommend aErop:al of preliminary and final replat of
the Golden Triangle Industrial Yarn, Phase V.
Mr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 3.00 acres
situated north of and abutting Morse Street, and east
of LOOP 288. This site is zoned light industrial and
office type develo Anent is anticipated. Water, sewer,
electric, telephones and solid waste services are
adequate and availaole. statf recommends approval or
the preliminary and final replat.
No one stoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Chair declared the public nearing closed.
Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend approval of the
preliminary and final re plat of the Golden Triangle
Industrial Park, Phase V. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and
unanimously carried i5-0).
G. Recommend approval of final replat of the Haywood
Addition, Block 10 Lot 1.
Mr. Persaud stated tnls is a tract of 0.9287 acres
situated south of and aoutting Sycamore Street west
of Carroll Boulevard and is zoned multi-family and the
purpose of the re plat is to remove the existing lot line
so as to create one building site to accommodate multi-
family develolunent. He stated the drainage proposals
submitted are acce ptaole. Staff recommends approval.
J
WrYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / i ELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
O : Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
DATE: March 14, 1985
SUBJECT: Purchase of land from Infinity Energy
Council has an agenda item on the approval of bids to buy some
right-of-way from the Infinity Energy Corporation. Since we
were unable to obtain right-of-way through the platting
process, we think it is necessary to reserve this right-of-way
for the future expansion of Ningo Road. Therefore, we
recommend the purchase.
I have spoken with John McGrane. We could suggest that some of
the interest earned from the CIP funds for U.S.380 be used to
accomplish this purchase. Since 380 is being delayed because
of the Highwri, Department's staffing problems some extra
interest is being generated.
If you or the Council has any further questions, we would be
happy to try and answer them.
F-c v - L a
Assistant City Manager
ji
2163M
i
'~°t' r. ' ~ V ~P, a ti r a~,: 9 F• ~~~a r'~. Y r r'~'; r n, v t
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS BY THE CITY OF
DENTON$ TEXAS FOR THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE
B.B.B. 6 C.R.R. CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 185, CITi AND COUNTY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, BEING ALL OF LO',S 11, 12 AND 13, BLOCK 2 OF THE
OATMAN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENTON, ACCEPTING A WARRANTY DEED
THEREFORE FROM INFINITY ENEP.GY, INC., AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, has
determined that it is in the beat interest of the citizens of the
City to purchase certain real property; and
WHEREAS, the Council is of the opinion that the purchase price
of $37,500 for the property is reasonable; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every
act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council herEby approves the expenditure of
THIRTY-SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($3719500.00) for the
purchase of that certain real property situated in the B.B.B. 6
C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 185, being all of Lots 11, 12 and
13, Block 2 of the Oatman Addition to the City of Denton froo
Infinity Energy, Inc., a Texas Corporation.
SECTION II.
That, upon payment of the purchase price, the City shall
accept the convcydnce, by Warranty Deed, of the real property
described in Section I hereof.
SECTION 111.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, KAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
C SECAE"lW
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: -(`f1.
'i
I.
3. v f s ;
Prepued by die State pat of 1 eaas for u a oalY. Reviewed
1 1.76. Revised 10 include granites addrelP L 6626, RCS) I.1•82.
WARRANTY DEED
THE STATE OF TEXAS l
COUNTY OF DLNTON r KNOW ALL h1EN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That INFINITY ENERGY, INC. - - - - - - - - - - -
of the Cov^.y „f Denton and State of Texar: for and In
consideration of the sum of - - - - - TEN AND NO/ONE HUNDREDS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ($10.00) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DOLLARS
and other valuable consideration to the undersigned paid by the grantee herein named, the re.eipt of
%Nth is hereby acknowledged.
NIA
have GRANTM SOLD AND CONVEYED, and by these presents do GRANT, SELL AND CONVEY unto
- - - - - - - - - THE CITY OF DENTON - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
of the County of Denton and State of Texas allot
the following described real property in Denton, Denton Count., Texas, to-twit:
SEE EXHTSiT "A"
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with all and singular the rights and
appurtenances thereto in an)wise belonging. unto the said grantee . its successors kttfrll and assigns
forever; AW it does dtshereby bind itself and its successors karsxaae~oodadtts6tieaataas to
WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND all and singular the said premises unto the said grantee ,
heirs and assigns, against every person whomsoever hwfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof.
EXECUTED this day of 'larch A.D. 1985.
INF TY. ENERQYj INC.
bit. V.
Mats M, DAVIS, Pr pat
6 M M1(~ y L H :F:,.'' 4, Y h. ~ .l
S , ~ S}if~. r Y 4
EXHIBIT "A"
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the
B,B.B. i C.R.R. Co. Survey, A-185, City and County of
Denton, Texas, being all of Lots 11, 12, and 13, Block 2, of
OATMAN ADDITION to the City of Denton, lat of which is
recorded in Vol. 148, Page 401, Deed Repcords of sdid County,
and being more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a found steel pin at the Southwest corner of
Lot 11 and the Southeast corner of Lot 10 on the North
boundary line of Lot 21, Block 2 of OATMAN ADD TIONI
THENCE North a distance of 140.0 feat to a steel pin at
the Northeast corner of Lot 10 and the Northwest corner of
Lot 11 on the South right of way of Schmitz Street:
THENCE North 896 40 390 East with the North Boundary
Line of Block 2 and the South right of way of Schmitz Street
a distance of 201.2 feet to a steel pin at the East corner
4,~f Lot 11 and of Block 2 on the Northwest right of way of
Mingo-Pishtrap Road:
THENCE South 510 491 54' west with the Northwesterly
right of way of Mingo-Pishtrap road a distance of 228.18
feet to a s&sel pin at the cast corner o! the aforeaentioned
Lot 211
THENCE South 890 40' 39' west with the South boundary
line of toot 11 and the North boundary line of Lot 21 a
distance of 21.80 feet to the Place of Beginning and con-
taining In all 15,610.007 square feet or 0.358 acre of land.
March 19 , 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4/`J76
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: G. Chris Xartung, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Proposed Contract with Texas Utilities Electric
Company (TUEC) Regarding Sale of Generation Capacity.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February
1985, recommended to the City Council approval of the
proposed contract to sell generating capacity to Texas
Utilities Electric Company.
SUMMARY
With Comanche Peak Nuclear Unit delayed until 1986, Texas
Utilities may have insufficient generating capacity to meet
their reserve margin requirements during the summer of
1985. They have asked to purchase ZOO- MW from the Texas
Municipal Power Pool member systems. The price is $35/MW
which will result in a total sale of $7 million. Denton's
share would be approximately 161. Any energy furnished
will be charged at fuel cost plus .2f/KWH for operating and
maintenance.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Electric Department, electric customers, Texas Municipal
Power Pool members, Texas Utilities Electric Company.
FIS'AL IMPACT
Sale of this capacity could offset the additional costs for
energy required due to Comanche Peak not being available
during 1985.
Estimated sales: 200,000 KW I $35/KW $7,000,000
.16%
Denton's Share (estimated 161) $11120,000
Prepared by: Respectfully Submitted
a 76
R. Nelson ~
/ wwm t
Director of Utilities
City Manager
A7 I t ;
R,f E. n
Pirector of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Proposed Contract
II Resolution
III Minutes PUB Meeting of
3489U:1
1008L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVING kN AGREEMENT
PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF ELECTRIC POUTER BY THE CITIES OF DENTON,
BRYAN, GARLAND AND GREENVILLE AND BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER
COOPERATIVE, INC. (REFERRED TO AS "TMPP") TO TE7:AS UTILITIES
ELECTRIC COMPANY (REFERRED TO AS "TUEC"); AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING? FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby approves the attached agreement,
providing for the sale of electric power by the Cities of Denson,
Bryan, Garland and Greenville and Brazos Electric Power
Cooperative, Inc. to Texas Utilities Electric Company and
authorizes the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the
City of Denton.
SECTION It.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
KLCRARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN9 CITY 'CRETM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AR TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
J
. .-•F s',yr «A.'. F art, .r a'.+iti' ~ ~a a'.
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
AGREF11ENT
COUNTY OF DENTON
This Agreement, made and entered into as of the day of
, 1985, by and between BRAZOS ELT= C POWER
COOPERATIVE, and the Cities of BRYAN, DENTON, GARLAND, and
GREENVILLE, hereinafter referred to as "TMPP", and TEXAS UTILITIES
ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Texas Corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"TUEC".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, TNPP owns and operates an electric utility system
including generation and transmission facilities in the State of
Texas, and desires to sell electric power to TUEC; and
WHEREAS, TUEC owns and operates an electric utility system
including generation, transmission and distribution facilities in
the State of Texas, and desires to purchase electric power from
TNPP;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual
covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties
hereto mutually contract and agree as follows:
ARTICLE I.
ELECTRIC POWER AND ENERGY
1.1 TMPP will have 20u megawatts (MW) generating capacity
available for sale to TUEC from 9 199
through and including , 19 and agrees to
sell such capacity to fUM on t e o ow ng terms, and subject to
the conditions set forth in this agreement:
(a) C_apacity_Charge: TUEC shall pay TMPP in Annual Capacity
charge as o ows:
(1) During 1985, the Annual,Ag achy Charge shall be
$7,u00,000 to be paid in„ ta-lments of :_l_Fg~
per month (hereinafter called Monthly a ac ty
Charge"); provided, however, if in any month TMPP
fails to have available 2Un. MW of capacity, then the
Monthly Capacity Charge for that month shall be
e~;justed to reflect the amount of capacity actually
available to TUEC. During any hour that any part or
all of the 200 MW is not available, the Monthly
Capacity Charge will be adjusted by subtracting $4.05
for each MW not available during such hour.
(2) Although in 1.1(a)(l) above a pricing adjustment is
set out for unavailable capacity, it is the intent of
this contract that the capacity sold hereunder shall
be available to TUEC at all Limes in accordance with
the terms of this agreement. This capacity sale
shall take precedence over any subsequent capacity
sales by TMPP Members to non-member entities.
(b) Enet Char e: TUEC is entitled to purchase energy up to
t e max um ourly amount capable of being generated by
the purchased capacity. For all such energy purchased,
TUEC will pay, in addition to the monthly Capacity Charge,
a Monthly Energy Charge for energy actually delivered to
PAGE 1
TUEC. The Monthly Energy Charga will permit TMPP to
recover (i) the incremental fuel costs (the same being
the lowest cost fuel available after the requirements of
TMPP's own load and prior contractual commitments are
satisfied) incurred by TMPP in generating the energy J
delivered to TUEC each month; (ii) the operation and
maintenance expenses incurred by TMPP in generating the
energy delivered to TUEC each month from TMPP gas and oil
fired generation, w'.•ich oxpenses will be billed ea--sloe
fd hiy--vgeret~ Toer ~~esd ,
p1Mwes multiplied by the resit- e~~G!a
kilowatt-hours to the total kilowatt-hours Saner-ated--by
T for the month and will-be-aO usted at
the end of each year to reflect the actual annual
operation and maintenance expenses attributed to gas and
q~l {r~A ~~aarsitoc~for_iga- eaa~--mult4f 4te4•4y_-the ratio
of actual annual TUEC kilowatt-hours to the total annual
gas-and--oil; and
(iii) the coats related to transmission losses on the
TMPP system resulting from such deliveries to TUEC each
month, which cost will be determined by load floe studies
under procedures to be established by the parties hereto.
The fuel costs for energy delivered to TUEC herein shall
be calculated by using the bus bar fuel costs for gas in
cents per kilowatt-hour based on a calculation of the
heat rates of the units which furnished the energy for
TUEC during the hours in which energy was supplied to
TUEC. The TMPP dispatcher, at his sole discretion, may
designate the unit or units which will generate the
energy for TUEC provided, however it is understood that
tte units so designated will be the most efficient units
available for operation after the TMPP load requirements
and prior contractual commitments are satisfied. Fuel
oil will be used to provide energy to TUEC only when
specifically authorized by the TUEC dispatcher, in which
case the additional cost of fuel oil over gas will be
borne by TUEC. It i- intended that the energy furnished
to TUEC by TMFP be jenerated in gas and/or oil fired
units. When energy is available frog coal fired units,
TMPP, at its sole discretion, may elect to furnish the
energy requested by ':UEC from such units at a cost equal
to the cost of ensrgy which would otherwise have been
generated by TMPP with gas as fuel (or oil, provided
prior authorization has been obtained), using the heat
rate of 100250 BTU/KWH for cost calculations.
TMPP will have complete discretion as to the fuel mix
that will be used to generate energy delivered to TUEC;
and it is anticippated that the fuel mix will vary
depending on such factors as the time of day the energy
is transferred, the number of units available at the time
of transfer, and industry accepted operation practices.
TMPP will inform TUEC of the anticipated fuel mix, and
the estimated coat of the components thereof, when each
scheduled period is requested, and TMPP will immediately
notify TUEC of any changes in the mix or in such
component costs during such scheduled period.
1.2 TUEC shall carry its spinning reserve assignments
raquired by applicable operating agree.aents on its own generators.
PAGE 2
ARTICLE II.
FUEL SUPPLY
2.1 The delivery of energy to TUEC is subject to fuel
limitations that may be imposed upon TMPP or :ts fuel suppliers
by regulutory action, statutory changes, or the invocation of
provisions in TMPP's existing or future contracts for boiler fuel.
2.2 Daily scheduled request for capacity and energy by TUEC
shall be made at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance unless
this requirement is waived by TMPP or anless TUEC has an emergency
capacity deficiency, in which event :apacity will be made avail-
able as soon as possible. Capactuy shall be scheduled for a
minimum of six (t) hours. The minimun take during any hourly
period in which capacity is scheduled shall not be less than
thirty percent (30%) of the maximum hourly amount scheduled.
Each time that capacity is started for TUEC, TUEC shall pay a
generating start-up cost to be calculated as follows: 3.5 times
the cost of fuel per BTU used in starting the unit times the cost
of fuel per million BTU used in starting the unit times the
maximum number of megawatts scheduled. No sltich start-up charge
will be made when units do not have to be started in order to
supply TUEC's requested capacity. TMPP dispatcher shall deter-
mine, at his sole discretion, whether capacity must be started in
order to fulfill TUEC's request for capacity and energy. TUEC
shall retain the right to abandon or reduce any schedule when a
gas curtailment or Force Majeure would cause a drastic change in
the fuel cost of TUEC. TMPP will not be obligated to pink up or
drop load at a rate in excess of 3 Mil/Min.
2.3 TUEC may arrange fog cel£very of natural gas fuel to TMPP
to be used by TMPP in generating the energy delivered by TMPP to
TUEC under this coi:tract. In the event TUEC does make such
natural gas fuel available to TMPP by contract release or other-
wise, TUEC shall be responsible for arranging the delivery of
such fuel to TMPP and TUEC will bear all costs for delivery of
said fuel. At such times as natural gas fuel is made available
to TMPP, TUEC will arrange for the delivery of said fuel to power
plants designated by TMPP.
ARTICLE III.
TRANSMISSION LINE CAPABILITY STUDIES AND WHEELING POWER
3.1 TUEC shall make all arrangements necessary to transport
the power and energy it expects to purchase from TMPP during the
term of this agreement.
ARTICLE IV.
CONTINUITY OF SERVICE, FORCE MAJEURE
4.1 Each party will exercise reasonable diligence and care to
avoid interruptions of delivery of power and energy hereunder, but
will not be liable for any damage or loss that may be occasioned
by any failure or interruption caused by fires, floods,
lightening, storms, or other acts of God; or b strikes, riots,
civil disturbances, action of public authority, litigations,
breakdown, or other causes beyond its reasonable co:;trol. TMPP
may interrupt service to make necessary repairs or to make
changes in equipment or to install new equipment, but only for
such time as may be unavoidable. Reasonable advance notice of
such interruption will be given if the nature of the situation
permits.
i
I
PAGE 3
ARTICLE V.
BILLING AND PAYMENT
5.1 Beginning , 19 , and continuing on
the teeth day of each calendar month thereat[er for months,
THPP or its designated agent shall render a statement for the
capacity charge and any energy delivered to TVEC during the
preceding month; provided, however, TMPP may defer said billing
for a reasonable period of time if required in order to obtain
the necessary information to compute the Monthly Energy Charge,
or said billing may be estimated, subject to correction in the
next succeeding month's billing. Thirty (30) days after the last
monthly bill, a corrected bill or credit shall be sent to TUEC.
TMPP shall consider all amounts due and payable within fifteen
(15) days from the date of the statement.
5.2 Each party shall have the right at reasonable hours to
examine the books, records and charts of the other party to the
extent necessary to verify the accuracy of any statement payment
calculation, or determination made pursuant to the provisions of
any article hereof. If any such examination shall reveal, or if
either party shall discover, any error in its own or the other
party's statements, payment calculation, nr determinationa, then
proper adjustment and correction thereof shall be made as
promptly as practicable thereafter.
ARTICLE V1.
REMEDIES FOR BREACH
6.1 In addition to and not excluding any remedy herein
provided, it is agreed that if either party fails to perform any
of its obligations hereunder, including the proapt payment of
monthly bills or delivery of electric power, the injured party
may suspend payment of bills or delivery of energy hereunder, and
said party will not be liable in any manner for loss or damage
arising from such nonpayment or suspension, provided that the
injured party shall specifically notify the other party of such
failure in writing at least ten (10) days prior to such
suspension or nonpayment. No such suspension or nonpayment will
interfere with the enforcement by either party in enforcing any
of its rights hereunder, and no waiver of any right to enforce
any breach hereof, will be deem:.d a waiver of such rights; nor
will any waiver of any other or subsequent default, all rights
and options herein provided to the benefit of either party being
continuing to Cho end that failure to exercise any such right or
option shtil not be construed as waiving the right or option upon
airy aubsequent delay or breach whether of like or different
character.
ARTICLE VII.
REGULATORY APPROVAL
7.1 The tarns of this contract and the charges herein set
forth are subject to the approval of any regulatory s ithority
having jurisdiction over the parties her9to, and the rates and
charges herein set forth are subject to change or cermination
pursuant to the order of such regulatory authority.
ARTICLE VIfI.
TERM
This agreement shall become effective upon execution and shall
continue in effect until 19
PAGE 4
ARTICLE IX.
SUC(,ESSORS AND ASSIGNS
This contract will inure to and be binding upon the successors
and assigns of the respective parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
contract to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of
the day and year first above written.
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
ATTEST:
BY:
CITY OF BRYAN
ATTEST:
BY:
CITY OF DENTON
ATTEST:
BY:
RICHARD U7. STEW) Tj MAYOR
CHARLOTTE ALLENj CITY SECRUM
CJTY OF GARLAND
ATTEST:
8Y:
CITY OF GSEENVILLE
ATTESTr
BY:
BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER
COOPERATIVE, INC.
ATTEST:
BYr
PAGE 5
Public Utilities Board Minutes
February 6. 1984
Page 3
The Texas Water Rights Commission staff will not recommend
a secondary use permit unless the downstream water land-
holders agree to release or reduce the permit volume of
Dallas and Denton. This would probably result in Dallas
charging Denton for the use of Dallas' water rights, at
approximately 36.72 cents per thousand gallons, the current
charge for City's raw water.
The Board discussed the item with Nelson. Mr. Hawley of
Oakmont Estates also spoke to the Board suggesting that he
had wished to be able to work with the City on this source,
both as a reliable source for his needs, the needs of the
Oakmont Estates Golf Course, and to provide a new resource
recovery for the City of Denton.
Board discussion followed reflecting the Board's concern
and directing the staff to continue work on this matter and
attempt to make sewer effluent available to the customers
of the City of Denton.
Thompson made a motion to direct staff to continue to work
on the sale of wastewater effluent with Oakmont Estates.
Second by Boyd. Three "ayes," no "nays". Motion carried.
6. CONSIDER APPROVAL Oj OVERSIZB PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH
0AKMONT ESTATES FOR WASTEWATER EFFLUENT LINE
Due to the discussion of the previous topic of the sales
contract for water/wastewater effluent to Oakmont Estates,
the Board tabled this item until further discussion and
other information is made available.
7. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PRO RATA AGREEMENT WITH OAKMONT
ESTATES FOR WASTEWATER EFFLUENT LINE
Again, due to the action taken on item M5 regarding the
contract of sale, the Board tabled this item pending
further investigation and new information.
8. CONSIDER PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH TEXAS UTILITIES REGARDING
THE SkLE OF GENERATING CAPACITY
Nelson informed the Board that Denton, as a pact of the
Texas Municipal Power Pool, has been approached by Texas
Utilities Electric Company to purchase excess capacity to
be available during our summer peak at a rate of about
$35.00 per KW of available power. The price per KW is
about equal to the current market value of the same
capacity available through gas turbine generators. Any
energy purchased in addition to the contract would be
charged at the cost of fuel, plus 2/10 of a cent per KWH
fot operating and maintenance. The total contract to
expected to bring in about $8.750.000 for the Texas
Municipal Power pool which includes Denton, aacland, Bryan,
Public Utilities 8oard Minutes
February 60 1984
Page 4
Greenville, and Brazos Electric. Denton's share would be
between 15. to 20 percent. Denton's share estimated
presently at about 18 percent or $1,,575,000 to the City of
Denton.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed one year contract
of sale for electrical generating capacity to Texas
Utilities.
The Board asked staff whether this was going to be good for
the city of Denton. Mr. Nelson suggested that, j
particularly in the light of recent failure of the Gibbons
Creek Generator and the postponing the Comanche Peak Plant,
this money would help off-set other increases which may be
necessary to the City of Denton customers.
Boyd made a motion to recommend the contract with Texas
Utilities for the sale of generation, capacity to the city
Council for adoption. Second by Thompson. Three "ayes
no "nays". Motion carried.
9. CONSIDER BID OPENING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT
NUMBER 85-W-15 (SPENCER ROAD) AND 85-W-16 (LOOP 288 WATBR
LINE), BID #9391
The project is intended to provide a 20" water line going
to Loop 288 from the existing water plant following Loop
288 north to McKinney Street and providing an 8" water line
from that line following Spencer Road. Utilities staff and
the City Engineering staff recommend award of the project
to Dickerson Construction Company, P. 0. Box 181, Celina,
Texas, 75009, in the amount of $486,522.
Staff informed the Board that the difference between the
bid amount $512,000 and the accepted bid amount of $486,522
was due to reduction in the requirements by the City on the
water line, such as the removal of 33 fire hydrants which
were in the original bib specifications. The 33 fire
hydrants will not be required since there is no development
in the area presently needing such hydrants. The future
developers will be required to place the fire hydrants as
they tie on.
Thompson made a motion to accept the staff proposal and
recommend to the City Council acceptance of bid of
Dickersor. Construction Company in the amount of =486,522.
Second by Boyd. Three "ayes," no "nays". Motion carried.
RLSOLUTtow
A RESOLUTION b they
y City Council of the City of
Denton, Texas, relating to the approval of
the Issuance of certain refunding bonds by e
' the North Texas Higher Education Authority,
Inc,; approving the issuance of such bonds
and making certain findings to connection
therewith,
WHEREAS, the North Texas Higher Education Authority, Inc. has heretofore
authorised the issuance of three series of bonds known as "North Texas Higher
Education Authority, Inc. Student Loan toads, Series 19828;' "North Texas Higher j
Education Authority, Inc. Student Loan Bonds, Series 1983A;" and "North Texas
Higher Education Authority, Inc. Student Loan bonds, Series 19835," and
WHEREAS, the directors of the Authority have advised this Council that it
would be In the best interest of the Authority it the aforesaid three series of
bonds were refunded in the manner provided by Article 717k, V.A.T.C.S., with the
understanding that the proceeds of the refunding bonds and money or securities
(Including income therefrom) held under the respective indentures securing the
outstanding bonds will be utilized for the payment of expenses, debt service,
reserves for the same or for the purchase of student loan notes as contemplated by
the said law and Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as emended;
now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED AT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION 1t That all of the recitals contateed in the preamble hereof are
found to be true and are adopted as the findings of this City Council,
SECTION 2t That tae Issuance of the proposed refunding bonds to order to
provil-eof tTie payment of the outstanding bonds and the security to% refunding
bonds, and the utillsatlon of the money and securities held under the respective
indentures securing the outstanding bonds in the manner and for the purposes
permitted under Article 717k, V.A.T.C.S. and Section 10) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended (as set forth to the preamble hereof) is hereby approved
o-jd authorised,
SECTION 31 At such time as the tefunding bonds aro approved by the Attorney
General of ieoas, a copy of the Attorney General's approving optnion shall be
filed (by the Authority) with the City Secretary.
SECTION 43 In r, ,vent does the City assume any responsibility in
connection with (t) the sdministration of this student loan program; (it) the
Issuance and delivery of bonds in connection therewith; or (ttli the payment of
any of the bonds issued by the Authority, it being understood these
responsibilities are bang assumed by the Authority.
SECTION St This resolution shall be effective from an! after its adoption,
PASSED AND APPROVED, THIS THE day of , 19550
Richard 0. Stewart, Mayor
ATTESTi city of nenton, Texas
CCRA o to eAenn, City $ecretary
City of Dentoo, Texas
(City Seal) APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
By$
CERTIFICATE FOR `
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INCLUSION OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, WITHIN THE
"ELIGIBLE LOAN AREA" IN CONNECTION WITH
DENTON COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION
SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1985
We, the undersigned officials of the City of
Denton, Texas, hereby certify as follows:
1. The City Council of the City of Denton, Texas
convened in session at m.
on (mg-71Meeting"), at t e desig-
nated meeting place, at which a duly constituted quorum was
present and acting throughout. Whereupon a written:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INCLUSION OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, WITHIN THE
"ELIGIBLE LOAN AREA" IN CONNECTION WITH
DENTON COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION
SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1985
(the "Resolution") was duly moved and seconded and, after
due discussion, said motion, carrying with it the adoption
of the Resolution, prevailed and carried by the following
votee:
AYES: NOES:
2. A true, full, and correct copy of the Resolu-
tion is attached to and follows this Certificate; the
Resolution has been duly recorded in the minutes of the
Meeting; the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full,
and correct excerpt from the minutes of the Meeting pertain-
ing to the adoption of the Resolution; and the Meeting was
open to the public, and public notice of the time, place,
and purpose of the Meeting was given, all as required by
Article 6252-17, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended.
SIGNED AND SEAL THIS
I
city Secretary
City of Denton, Texas
(SEAL)
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INCLUSION OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, WITHIN THE
"ELIGIBLE LOAN AREA" IN CONNECTION WITH
DENTON COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION
SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1985
WHEREAS, the Denton County Housing Finance
Corporation (the "Corporation") was created by a Resolution
adopted by the Commissioners Court of Denton County, Texas
(the "County") pursuant to Article 12691-7, Vernon's Texas
Civil Statutes, as amended (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Corporation
intends to issue on or before April 12, 1985 its Single
Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1985 (the "Bonds") in
order to provide funds to purchase mortgage loans frova par-
ticipating lenders that have been made to eligible borrowers
to finance owner occupied single family residential housing
within the County; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires that the governing body
of any city located within the County, the population of
which exceeds 20,000, must approve the use of the proceeds
of the Bonds to purchase home mortgages for homes located
within such city; and
WHEREAS, it is found and determined that it is
within the best interest of the inhabitants of the City of
Denton, Texas (the "City") and will promote the public
welfare and the public purposes of the Act for the proceeds
of the Bonds to be used to purchase home mortgages for homes
located within the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, that:
1. The use of the proceeds of the Bonds to
purchase home mortgages for homes located within the
corporate limits of the City is hereby authorized and
approved, and tho inclusion of the City within the "Eligible
Loan Area" as used and defined in the Sale, Servicing and
Administration Agreement, to be entered into by and between
the Corporation, the party named as Administrator-Ser,/icer
therein, the party named as Trustee therein, and the
participating lenders named therein, is hereby approved.
2. The Mayor, the City Manager, the City
Secretary and any member of the City Council and any other
officers of the City are hereby authorized, jointly and
severally, to execute and deliver such endorsements,
instruments, certificates, documents or papers necessary or
vital to carry out the intent and purposes of this Resolu-
tion.
3. This resolution shall be effective from and
after its passage, and it is so resolved.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
Mayor
City of Denton, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of Denton, Texas
~2.
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, on Saturday, Ap:il 20, 1985, the Sigma Alpha Hu
Fraternity is sponsoring an Spring Renaissance to be held on Fry
Street between the intersection of Oak end Hickory; and
WHEREAS, all abutting property owners of the street have
given their permission to tho temporary' closing of said street;
and
WHEREAS, the Spring Renaissance is open to the general
public of of the City and County of Denton; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for the said
Renaissance and in order to protect the safety of citizens who
attend, the City Council of the City of Denton deems it is
necessary to temporarily close a portion of Fry Street between
Oak Street and Hickory Street from the hours of 5:00 A.M. until
7:00 I.M. on April 20, 1985; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTOIW, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That Fry Street between Oak Street and Hickory Street shall
be temporarily closed as a street or public thorougnfare of any
kind or character whatever on April 20, 1985 from 8:00 A.H.
until 1:00 P.M. for the purpose of holding the Sigma Alpha No
Spring kenaissance.
SECTION It.
That the portion of the above described streets shall revert
back to the City for normal traffic activity t=ediately from
and after 7:00 P.M. on April 20, 1985.
SECTION III.
Thlt this resolution shall take effect and be in full force
snd effect from and after the date of its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of March, 1985.
RICHM 0. STEWART, MAYO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETW
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. HORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY : Lv y
i