HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-16-1985
C ITy COUNC IL
AGENDA
I
O4 - 14 - 85
•N..r U.^.~ '4 r~~ ) . _.N C ^ ° 11 a w e!~ 'r t ,C 1 T~ wr e 1 ~l y{B RFS •s
K~ `y r i .Y i ~'I''l r S c$ 1.?~ r r Y a k ih Irr 11 i c b r, y Y ' ~ ~ N
TNC CITY OF DE AGENDA COUNCIL
April 16, 1985
• Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
April 16, 1985, at 4:00 p. m., meeting in the parking lot of the
Municipal Building at which the following item will be
considered:
4:00 p.m.
1. Conduct a tour to view various billboards and signs in
conjunction with the proposed sign ordinance.
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
April 16, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
S:30 P.M,
1. Consider the scheduling of the $10,000,000 street bond
project.
2. Discussion of proposed restructuring of current out-
of-city fee structure for the Library.
3. Review and consider approval of proposed changes to
• the 1985 Citizen Survey.
4. Discussion of an ordinance prohibiting storage of cars
on residential lawns.
S. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T.:.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 62S2-17
V. A. T. S.
C, Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 62S2-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252.17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
April 16, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:10 p. m.
• 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 21 198S and the Special Called
Meeting of April 9, 19856
~ 4 } t y jr ~ ei~ • Y- Z F 1 1: X k t. , r ,^.~Pp~'
e P t f: Y A~ _ ~ ~ )ash drx fa~.j) L ~,r~. i w } ^"L e ~ wl~ (I
+Clt of Denton City Council Agenda
April 16, 1985
Page Two
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
4.A, 4.B, 4,C). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow 17ounLil Members to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ord:.,ance.
1, Bid 1 9324 - Vacuum pump
2. Bid 1 9367 - Pickups and trucks
3. Bid 1 9386 - Vibratory rollers
4. Bid 1 9424 - 8" water line
S. Bid 19427 - Hand held electronic meter
reading device
6. Bid 1 9433 - Parkway Plaza - WAS
participation
7. Bid 1 9436 - Chip spreader and asphalt paver
8. Bid 1 9440 - Playground equipment
9. Bid 1 940S - Raw water pump installation
10. Bid 1 943$ - 2.0 MG ground storage tank
11. Purchase Order 1 67248 to Floyd Glenn Smith
in the amount of $3,341.00
12. Purchase Order 1 67420 to Butler and Land in
the amount of $3,776.00
13. Purchase Order 1 67488 to Gifford-Hill
American in the amount of $4,7S8,00
• 14, Purchase Order 1 67572 to Motorola
Communications in the amount of $6,948,00
Y. 3~~ a ,ya h ti~ 'b v~ y^r r-M1 i~ 1 ¢ 3i" :,t LL% :c.}
City `of Denton City Council Agenda
April 16, 198S
Page Three
1S. Purchase Order 1 67579 to A. P. Green in the
amount of $8,000.00
16. Purchase Order 1 67719 to Vermeer Equipment
in the amount of $3,083.S4
B. Plats and Replats:
1. Approval of preliminary plat of the Bell
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
2. Approval of final replat of the A. E. Bell
Addition, Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 2. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
31 Approval of preliminary replat of the JBC
Addition, Lot 3A, Block 1. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of preliminary plat of the Life
►'abernacle Church Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
S. Approval of preliminary plat of the Naughton
Place Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
6. Approval of preliminary replat of the Redman
Addition, Lot 1B, Block 2. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
7. Approval of preliminary pplat of the Cedar
Creek Addition, Lots 1-16, Block 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
C. Change Order:
14 Consider approval of Change Order 11 for
water/sewer line relocation on Loop 288 to
Calvert Paving Company - Bid 1 9364
3. Public Hearings:
. A. Z-1729 This is the petition of Charles Watkins
requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the light
industrial (LI) district on a .462 acre tract
row, ',IV 1Z ci6 ! M.f
rKn ~y' 1 :.'a 1
City ofDenton City Council Agenda
April 169 1985
Page Four
located at the northwest corner of U.S. Highway
380 and Cooper Creek Road. if the zoning change
is approved, the property may be utilized for an
land use permitted in the light industrial (LI)
district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change
in zoning on a .462 acre tract located at
the northwest corner of U.S. Highway 380 and
Cooper Creek Road.
4. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing
for an effective date.
• B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipmont, supplies or services iii
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids; and providing for.an effective
date.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements;
providing for the expenditure of funds therefore;
and providing for an effective date.
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings regarding the
petition of Hammett 4 Nash, Inc. for annexation
of approximately 361.708 acres situated in the H.
May Survey, Abstract 807, and the Y. B. Gailor
Survey, Abstract 4S2, and beginning west of FM
2164 (North Locust) approximately 7,000 feet
north of Hercules (A•16)6
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings regarding the
• petition of Hammett S Nash, Inc. for annexation
of approximately 180.9855 acres situated in the
John A. Burns Survey, Abstract 130, and the
Thomas Polk Survey, Abstract 999 and beginning
west of FM 2164 (North Locust] approximately
9,000 feet north of Hercules (A619)1
t~ti~`{r
ib,A4 11170,
97.
.,City,df Denton City Council Agenda
April 16, 1985
• Page Five
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing
Section ZS-6.1 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton, Texas; reenacting a new Section
25-6.1 to provide for the average billing of
utility services; and providing for an effective
date. (The Public Utilities Board recommends
approval.)
G. Consider Fdoption of an ordinance approving a
proposed oversize agreement with Ridgeway Plaza
Joint Venture for a new water line of Lillian B.
Miller Parkway along the frontage of the
property. (The Public Utilities Board recommends
approval.)
S. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution closing
Congress Street between Alice and Denton streets
frog 3:00 p.m, to 7:00 p.m. on Friday, May 10,
1985 for the annual Day of the Cougar fundraising
event sponsored by the Calhoun Junior High School
PTA.
. B. Consider approval of a resolution approving an
agreement by the City of Denton Industrial
Development Authority to issue a bond for Glenn
L. Hulcher and the bond resolution providing for
the issuance of such bond.
C. Consider approval of a resolution expressing the
City of Denton's intent to enter into a water
sales agreement with Argyle Water Supply
Corporation. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
D. Consider approval of a resolution postponing the
regular meeting of the City of Denton City
Council from May 7, 1985 to May 14, 1985.
6. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
7. New Business:
• This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
:tea'
a 1.
, t
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Nall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1985 at o' clock
(a. M.) (p. M.)
CITY SECREMY
1717C
71T Ifi 13
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
April 16, 1985
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
April 16', 19859 at 4:00 p.m, meeting in the parking lot of the
Municipal Building at which the following item will be
considered:
4:00 p.m.
1. Conduct a tour to view various billboards and signs in
conjunction with the proposed sign ordinance.
Mork Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
April 16, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items wall be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
1. Consider the scheduling of the $10,000,000 street bond
pro)ect.
2. Discussion of proposed restructuring of current out-
of-city fee structure for the Library.
3. Review and consider approval of proposed changes to
the 1985 Citizen Survey.
4. Discussion of an ordinance prohibiting storage of cars
on residential lawns.
S. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V. A. i. S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6251-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Hoard Appointments Under Sec. I(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
April 16, 19859 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the `
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 P.M.
11 Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 2, 1985 and the Special Called
Meeting of April 9, 1985.
s r + M
1 r~r {r -.y i + ~ F i
%
Y
Ci of Denton City Council Agenda
Apty ril 16, 1985 °
Page Two
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will 5e strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
Detailed
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda.
bark-up information is attached to the ordinances {Agenda items
4.A ' 4.Bo 4.0, This to allow Council Members listing ndiscussany provided item t prior Consent n approval
of the ordinance.
1. Bid 1 9324 - Vacuum pump
2. Bid # 9367 - Pickups and trucks
3. Bid # 9386 - Vibratory rollers
4. Bid # 941" - 8" water line
5. Bid #9427 reading devicelectronic meter
6. Bid # 9433 - Parkway Plaza - W$S
participation
7. Bid # 9436 - Chip spreader and asphalt paver
8. Bid # 9440 - Playground equipment
9. Bid 1 9405 - Raw water pump installation
10. Bid # 9435 - 2.0 MG ground storage tank
11. Purchase Order # 67248 to Floyd Glenn Smith
in the amount of $3,341.00
12. Purchase Order # 67420 to Butler and Land in
the amount of $3,776.00
13. Purchase Order # 67488 to Gifford-Hill
American in the amount of $4,758.00
14. Purchase Order # 67572 to Motorola
Communications in the amount of $6,948.00
a AiA ! r l+ r ,q!Cr 1 F,f L- 4 * rF M, 4
P 9 _ ~ " ~ti~f•1, i, n 7 r 1''.r,~1 ~ f"~~. r F. ~ Irv. r (+r ~ad
,4 S S` , r ` rL
City of Denton City Council Agenda
April 16, 1985
Page Three
15. Purchase Order f 67579 to A. P. Green in the
amount of $8,000.00
16. Purchase Order 4 67719 to Vermeer Equipment
in the amount of $3,083.54
B. Plats and Replats;
1. Approval of preliminary plat of the Bell
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
2. Approval of final replat of the A. E. Bell
Addition, Lots 6, 7 onl 8, Block 2. (The
Planning and Zoning '-ommission recommends
approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary replat of the JBC
Addition, Lot 3A, Block 1. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
4. Approval of preliminary plat of the Life
Tabernacle Church Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
5. Approval of preliminary plat of the Naughton
Place Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
6. Approval of preliminary replat of the Redman
Addition, Lot 1B, Block 2. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
7. Approval of preliminary Vat of the Cedar
Creek Addition, Lots 1-16, Block 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
C. Change Order:
1. Consider approval of ,hange Order 01 for
water/sewer line relocation on Loop 288 to
Calvert Paving Company - Bid i 9364
31 Public Hearings:
A. Z-1729 This is the petition of Charles Watkins
requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the light
industrial (LI) district on a ,462 acre tract
'LF
y + a•~f f '.re ~i 4 o-L.,: Yi v`V S. `5~ d!~ r` A y ~Y~t
r
.r
1', .`ri ev,'b / , a .4.r 1 a f w e rw 4 C r ^Y ! ~ .1yy..
City of Denton City Council Agenda
April 16, 198S
Page Pour
located at the northwest corner of U.S. Highway
380 and Cooper Creek Road. If the zoning change
is approved, the property may be utilized for any
land use permitted in the light industrial (LI)
district by the City of Denton Zo.iing Ordinance.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change
in zoning on a .462 acre tract located at
the northwest corner of U.S. Highway 380 and
Cooper Creek Road.
4. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance acceptin
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing
for an effective date.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids; and providing for an effective
date.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improve eats;
providing for the expenditure of funds therefore;
and providing for an effective date.
D, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings regarding the
petition of Hammett 6 Nash, Inc. for annexation
of approximately 361.708 acres situated in the H.
May Survey, Abstract 807, and the V. 8. Gailor
Survey, Abstract 452, and beginning west of FM
2164 (North Locust) approximately 7,000 feet
north of Hercules (A-16).
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings regarding the
petition of Hammett 4 Nash, Inc. for annexation
of approximately 180,9855 acres situated in the
John A. Burna Surveyy , Abstract 130, and the
Thomas Polk Survey, Abstract 999 and be inning
west of FM 2164 (North Locusti approximately
9,000 feet north of Hercules (A-19),
1 4 C. u
t ~ adt ' ~ ~~`ea ! ~ r fr "r' f t stn r a;• ;W
City of Denton City Council Agetiida
April 16, 1985
Page Five
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing
Section 25-6.1 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton, Texas; reenacting a new Section
25-6.1 to provide for the av.rage billing of
utility services; and providing for an effective
date. (The Public Utilities Board recommends
approval.)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
proposed oversize agreement with Ridgeway Plaza
Joint Venture for a new water line of Lillian B.
Miller Parkway along the frontage of the
property. (The Public Utilities Board recommends
approval.)
S. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution closing
Congress Street between Alice and Denton streets
from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m, on, Friday, May 10,
1985 for the annual Day of the Cougar fundraising
event sponsored by the Calhoun Junior High Schnol
PTA.
6. Consider approval of a resolution approving do
agreement by the City of Denton Industrial
Development Authority to issue a bond for Glenn
L. Hulcher and the bond resolution providing for
the issuance of such bond.
C. Consider approval of a resolution expressing the
City of Denton's intent to enter into a water
sales agreement with Argyle Water Supply
Corporation. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
D. Consider approval of a resolution postponing the
regular meeting of the City of Denton City
Council from May 7, 1985 to May 14, 1985.
6. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B, Real Estate
C. Personnel
D, Board Appointments
7, New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas,
n ° a `x t r v1 y7N ; r .x. ^ ar
^.1 ~ ~..A`as
v ,C_4• Fyn 5 3:r. b. r x r., e s 'i 5 r -i r v ,c r
r > P `
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1985 at o' clock
(a.m.) (p.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
1717C
Q ( A 4 y} 1
Ile
{St 77T DATE: 40
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAL' S6
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Scheduling of street bond projects
RECOMMENDATION:
SUMMARY:
Priorities of street overlaying, repaving and rebuilding for the
street bond project will be discussed.
BACKGROUND:
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
FISCAL IMPACT:
Respec fu y s but ted:
ri a
City Manager
Prep, ed y:
me Rick Svehla
Title Assistant City Manager
Approved.
Name
Title
CITYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 1 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
DATE: April 10, 1985
SUBJECT: Scheduling of the $10,000,000 Bond Project
Attached is our first attempt at scheduling of the bond
project. Through discussions with First Southwest, we are
anticipating, that the first contracts could be let somewhere
around the first of June. We will propose that the first two
contracts consist of the majority of the repaving and
overlaying projects that were approved. These two contracts
together would constitute approximately 1.2 million dollars
worth of construction. We anticipate them being finished by
January of 1986. By that time we would be ready to go to
contract with the bulk of the rebuild projects that we have
scheduled in 1985. The 1985 rebuild projects were chosen for
several reasons. In one instance it was an attempt to begin to
eliminate congestion in the southern part of the City. Two
projects were connected with drainage problems that exist at
the present. Another project was chosen because the street
continues to move and thwart our maintenance attempts. And
finally, one of the streets on the Square was chosen to help us
facilitate scheduling as the projects continue year after
year. You will note that these 1985 rebuilding projects add up
to a pp,oximately a million dollars also.
In 1986, the total cost of the projects would be less than two
million to off-set the expenditures of over two million the
first year. The 1986 projects include major portions of
Hickory, again to help us schedule around major streets and
traffic carriers. Avenue C was chosen because of it's close
proximity to Hickory Street and also it's maintenance
condition. Glenwood was ct•asen because of drainage problems
that exist.
1~, r.. J5 5 r ,~^Y ; q fH i ^s "Cw s. x u : i i 11", _n "_V d R . S H~ / + } y k. S i
.NLS
Scheduling of street bond projects
April 10, 1985
Page 2
1987 would continue with the philosophy of trying to spread the
projects all over town. Oak Street would be done this year.
Fry being very close to that would also be done Magnolia and
Boliver would bo done together because of their proximity to
each other and the largest project that year would be Teasley
Lane. The timing of the project is based on the preliminary
information that we have received from the Highway Department.
1988 would see a major activity on Bonnie Brae and we would be
doing extensive work on Locust. Bonnie Brae was put off until
later in the bond issue for several reasons. Number one, we
have just spent a considerable amount of money redoing a rather
long section of the road between University and Linden. The
second reason was that we see major developments beginning to
occur along Bonnie Brae and we felt that we might be able to
get participation by other developers. And finally, since
there is already existing major activities on the north side of
town which promote concrete truck traffic on this road, we
would like to see several of those finished out before we put a
new street in.
Finally, the last year finishes out Bonnie Brae. It also
completes Scripture and West Oak which are currently vacant and
again would nave some chance for developer participation. And
finally, we do the southern end of Elm which again is based on
scheduling in trying to minimize disruptions in different parts
of the City.
In addition to this, we are also continuing to seek 'nput from
Utilities, particularly Water and Sewer and the Gas Company.
Because of their scheduling we may have to reschedule several
of these particularly in the overlay and repaving categories.
Our suggestion would be that we still go forward assumming that
the majority of overlaying and repaving would be done the first
year. We would let the smaller amounts of repaving and
overlaying in the subsequent years in order to facilitate the
Utility planning. We are also currently looking at some of the
overlay and repaving, particularly roads like Mingo, Hobson,
Stuart, Nottingham, etc., where we feel that some work on the
base and sub-base of the road would be advantageous to do. In
those instances, we would be looking at using Street Department
personnel and our mixer-reclaimer (the Bomagg) to remix the road
beds before we repave or overlay them. We would thus get a
better sub-grade and base underneath the roads and then be able
to seal them off with the wearing courses.
i
S ' d i V rt^tM I.. , N5 6t '.7;. "w r. Sqb. e`~r. va ^ I.lr~'~; r'-rl 5 '.f
F ~'..a t .4.', fe_ .bry M I yrr 9 1I Iv .
~N .rI y'l rf Y J-.
I
Scheduling of street bond projects
April 10, 1985
Page 3
At the early session on Tuesday, we will have more input from
Utilities on their CIP scheduling. We will be able to discuss
any conflicts that we have found at that time.
If you or the Council has any further imput or questions, we
would be y to try and implement those ideas or answer any
further ques ions.
ve hIN
Assistant City Manager
Attachment
ji
2233M
i
4 4 r ll 3 s~ r v e r Z.¢ n b . C~j rF Ytl .
OVERLAY 1985
i
Bo;jndaries
Street Name From To Cost Miles
Avenue C Mulberry Oak 150798 ,20
Bolivar Congress University 40,054 ,80
Elm Prairie Highland 71899 .10
Magnolia New Asphalt Hinkle 14,445 .25
Bill Congress Oak 269588 .30
Stuart Kings Row Coronado 34,667 .60
Elm Mulberry Prairie 15,798 .20
Hercules Picadilly Sheraton 17,334 .30
Locust Hickory Oak 51628 .OS
Withers Oakland Mingo 17,334 .30
Robinwood Emerson University 34,668 .60
Paisley Woodford Hettie 8,085 ,20
Locust Oak McKinney 49431 .05
Paisley Frame Ruddell 139857 ,40
First Bolivar Locust 8,667 1S
Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywood 409445 .70
Kings Row Sherman Yorkshire 231118 .30
Mockingbird McKinney Oriole 100' 28,889 .SO
Locust McKinney Congress 15,798 ,20
Emerson Freedom Wilsonwood 861669 1.50
Austin McKinney Mulberry 8,666 .15
Audra McKinney End of Divide 299480 .30
Locust Mulberry Hickory 59628 .05
McCormick Parvin Willowwood 17,334 .30
Hollyhill Ridgecrest Tennyson 63,557 1.10
Avenue D Highland I1:-3S 14,445 125
Total Overlay $599,282 9.85
t r c E i w n. A 9Y ' iti•rb. •er .n Ri rh ' : ° ,1 •1'Pb a ti ,
•d i. Y i ~ [ ~ ~t~ tl doh S • 1~y e `n _ a ~ x I,' , ,i,
i • 1 ~Kj r k~ + f d
REPAVE 1985
Boundaries
Street Namo From To Cost Miles
Hillcrest Scripture Emery 479018 .65
Carroll Northridge Ross 299040 SO
Oak Austin Bolivar 170424 .20
Hercules Redstone Stuart 26.400 .25
Stuart Hercules Kings Row 23,112 .40
Mingo Withers Mockingbird 1160160 2.20
Old North Road University Mill Pond 270720 .3S
Frame RRX S. McKinney 170424 .30
Nottingham University Windsor S7,869 .80
Greerwcod Cherrywood Sherman 11,616 .20
Locust University Sherman Drive S9662 .10
Elm University Congress 559440 .70
Paisley Hettie Ruddell 413S6 .10
Pertain Mingo Wayne 41356 10
Hobson Lane Teasley FM-1830 50,094 2.15
Congress Oakland Ponder 55,176 .95
Locust Eagle Mulberry 47,916 SO
Total Repave 5969783 9.4S
'fkT?,,r t 5. yl~r is~ r'_j r_..~ ~"~kR$~i ~''r i ~1',•
"4 ' l r
REBUILD
1M
Boundaries
Street Name From To Cost Miles
Stuart Selene Hercules 123,595 .30
Hickory Carroll Cedar 105,045 .10
Pershing Stuart Atlas 799020 .20
Locust Sherman Orr 4739218 SS
Hickory Cedar Austin 116,9SO .20
Teasley Dallas Dr. IH-3S 170 000 ,30
S11 067"821 I m
1986
Hickory Avenue C Bonnie Brae 372,479 .70
Hickory Avenue C Welch 200,S47 .40
Avenue C IH-3S Mulberry 556,781 .70
Glenwood Windsor University 387,739 .70
Welch Mulberry Hickory 5;: 694 .10
1057i;Z40 2-6
1987
Oak Bolivar Jagoe 4610440 1.00
Magnolia New Asphalt Bolivar 176,991 .30
Bolivar Northridge University 471,615 .70
Fry Scripture Oak 1135740 .20
West Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe 312,295 .70
Teasley Lane Dallas Drive Ryan Road 110006000 2.00
S 44x"6
t i ,;=4 ~r£ t 1 l Ik"t 4 e p r ~,.f xy'.i ^'1 4 N y C i a 5 L {
1988
Bonnie Brae Windsor University 301,557 .70
Bonnie Brae University Scripture 899,984 .75
Audra End of Divide paisley 61,244 .10
Acme Bernard Fort Worth Dr. 61,302 .2S
Locust Congress University 682,095 .70
21006,182 2.50
1989
Bonnie Brae Riney Windsor 397,876 .65
Scripture YH_35 Bonnie Brae 347,907 SO
West Oak 1H-3S Y 2079876 .30
Avenue A Highland McCormick 210,028 SS
81n Highland Eagle 314 S:~ .15
1,178"2, 2:"
2198M
Y
M E M O R A N D U M
To: BETTY MoKEAN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
FROM: JOELLA ORR, LIBRARY DIRECTOR
SUBJ: REPORT TO CITY COUJCIL ON OUT-OF-CITY FEES
DATE: April 4, 1985
Attached you will find the documentation 1 plan to present to the
City Council on the status of charging out-of-city patrons for library use.
I have asked to be placed on the agenda during the work session, as I
plan for this presentation to be an informal update to the Council on the
effectiveness of the current fee structure in the City's recovering the Cost
of service to out-of-city users in relation to the cost of providing service
for these patrons.
I
r
Joeila r, Library Director
of
0138h
REPORT 10 THE DENTON CITY COUNCIL
OUT-OF-CITY FEES
DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY OUT-OF-CITY PATRON USE RESPONSE:
In FY 1983/84, out-of-city use averaged 20% of our total circulation,
which Cost the City of Denton =96,610. 3481000 of this was recovered by the
County's contribution to the library'a funding.
Out-of-city use of the library for the first six months of this budget
year (84/85) has accounted for 163 of our total oiroulation. Translated into
budget dollars, this amounts to $47,410. We have recovered $6,'349 of this
amount through v.he sale of 619 patron cards at all per card. This money has
been spent on children's bc+oks and although this has been helpful, it does not
cover the actual cost of this service.
As a result of the user fee, we have had a 4% drop in circulation. As we
prepare to begin the budget process for the upcoming fiscal year, we would
like the City Council to consider the following options in an effort to
recover the cost of out-of -olty patron use.
1. Continue providing service as we are currently doing with the
taxpayers of Denton subsidizing out-of-oily use.
2. Discontinue service to out-of-oily patrons.
3a Obtain funding from the County to recover the cost of out-of-olty
patron use.
4, Increase fees to recover costs:
A, $35 per card (would have recovered $21,665 to date)
So $1,50 per transaotion (would have recovered $23033 to date)
C, $1.25 per transaotion (would have reoover4d $19077 to date)
'T N r
LIBRARY
cM
5iQ
IM
3M
m
1M
Y
all Gifu%
NEW PATRON REGISTRATION COMPARISON
1 • •
9% A
LI BR
WRY
X84 84/85
9Q 0- 2o. 12.9
N- 19. 15.2
pX 71 L D- 18. 15.7
r 68 If J- 20. 17.
56 e- 21. 17.3
44 M- 21. 17.9
39 A- 20.
N 28 M- 19.
J- 20.
J- 20.
A- 20.
p1~nU~s 01983/A4
out-or-ci Y USE s- 17.
~ tir. 3x T ~ ~
t
REPORT TO THE DENTON CITY COUNCIL
OUT-OF-CITY FEES
FEE STRUCTURE OF AREA LIBRARIES FOR OUT-OF-CITY/COUNTY PATRON USE:
Dallas Public Library - °unch card with 4 catagories:
$ 5 - 15 items
$10 - 35 items
$15 - 75 items
$35 - 300 items
Highland Park Library - Fee is charged per family (a family may have 4
cards and 4 numbers for the same price). Fee is based on the tax rate.
Residents pay:
S 65 - books only
$100 - video collection
$165 - full service per year
Only individual cards issued are for children 5-13 at $10 and these are
limited to use only for the children's collection.
Use a red stamp on cards to indicate which materials patrons may use.
Farmer's Branch Library - gives free service to anybody who gives .heir
residents freo service. At the present only charge Dallas & Lewisville
residents $15 per punch card which allows for 75 items with no time limits
Hurst Public Library - to begin May 1, 1985:
254 per item, book and audio visual - they will i3Aue a coupon book
for 20 checkouts per book, $5 per book.
Haltom City Publio Library - at the present they plan to do nothing. The
surrounding libraries (Richland Hills, N. Richland Hills, Bedford, Euless,
Hurst, Orapevine, Keller, & Watauga) will probably work together and have
reoiprocal borrowing, Only one Charged will be Fort North.
i e.a pi eM1tTA Y S r t }
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Area Libraries Fea Structure
Page -2-
Arlington Public Library - Right now, they don't charge, don't issue a
card. 'there has been no formal plan submitted for approval, but
discussions have been held about charging for patron use.
Fort North Public Library - effective FY 1984/85:
S 5 - 3 items
$10 - 7 items
$25 - 18 it&. 3
50 - 40 items
REPORT TO THE DENTON CITY COUNCIL
OUT-OF-CITY FEES
OUT-OF-CITY CARDS ISSUED BY AREA:
(as of 3/31/85)
CITY ! CARDS ISSUED CITY 4 CARDS ISSUED
Argyle 98 Krum 34
Alvord I Lake Dallas 30
Aubrey 52 Lewisville 48
Chico 1 Little Elm 7
Corinth 14 Pilot Point 23
Dallas 1 Ponder 19
Decatur 3 Roanoke 23
Denton (Rural Rts.) 175 Sanger 57
Flower Mound 10 The Colony 2
Frisco 27 Valley View 2
Justin 22 Carrollton 1
Mabank 1 Double Oak 1
i
! y.y lv ray W• ,K r r ;
t t
/~~/d✓
DATE:
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT S
Ll --s
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of staff changes and further recom-
mendations.
SUMMARY: Staff has reviewed the 1984 Citizen Survey instrument
and has made r,c+commendations for changes. These recom-
mendations are highlighted in the Council's copy of
the survey.
BACKGROUND: Not applicable
PROGRAMS, DEPART-TENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT; Not applicable.
Respe tfu iy sub: tted;
•
u. MIS Hartung
City Manager
Ax-wpu
~1_
~v, ~ Name( HTTan Stuart
Title Administrative Assistant
Ap oved:
10i, IV A,
NJW tty McKean
Title 4
Assistant City Manager
f~ f; N v ~.r Y A
f i ~w _ r n
l
CITY of oENTON, rcxAs MUNICIPAL BULL DING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8_' 00
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM., Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
DATE: April 10, 1985
SUBJECT: Denton Citizen Survey
On Tuesday April 9, 1985 City staff members met with Dr. James
Glass of North Texas State University to revise the upcoming
Citizen Survey. Attached you will find a copy of the survey
instrument with the recommended revisions highlighted for your
review.
Dr. Glass will attend the Council meeting on April 16, 1985, at
5:30 p.m. to record any additional changes or additions the
Council may wish to make to the instrument.
e
Bets n
Assistant City Manager
ji
2220M
DENTON OITIYHN SURVEY 1983
I Respondent's Telephone Numberi
Contact made on call number 1 2 3 4 5
I
1 Interview date
I He1109 my name is I'm working on a project for the City
I of Denton and I would like to talk with any female/male age 18 or older.
! (TO RESPONDENT) We are conducting a survey for the City of Denton
re- garding citizens' feelings about services provided by the city. The
I questions that I wish to ask you will take only a few minutes and your
I answers will be useful to the city staff and city council as they
de- velop the budget for next year. All if your answers will be kept con-
fidential. Will you please take the time to help us?
I 14 First, how long have you lived in Dentoi. (DO NOT READ RESPONSES)
I
I 1. LESS THAN 3 MONTHS (TERMINATE INTERVIEW)
I 2. 3 MONTHS BUT LESS THAN ONE YEAR (ASK Q la)
1 3. 1-3 YEARS
1 4. 6-10 YEARS
1 5. MORE THAN 10 YEARS
I 9. NO RESPONSE/DON'T KNOW (HR/DK)
I I Ia. FOR THOSE WHO RESPONDED 3 MONTHS BUT LESS THAN ONE YEAR.
I ! ghat vas the primary reason you moved to Denton?
! I 1. JOB
! ! 2. STUDENT NTSU/TWU
( 1 J. RETIREMENT
I I 4. DENTON AS A PLACE TO LIVE
I 1 5. OTHER, SPECIFY
I I 9. HR/DK
1 2. In terms of cleanliness, quality of houses, and general appear-
ance, how would you rate the condition of your neighborhood? Is
I the condition excellent, good, fair, or poor?
I
I 1. Excellent 3. Fair
1 2, bond 4. Poor 9, N01DK
1
1 3, 1 would like to ask you a question about streets in the city.
I How would you rate the condition of the street and road surfaces
I in Denton? Are they in good condition all over, mostly good, but
I but with a few bad spots, or are there many bad spots?
1
I 1. Good all over 3. Many bad spots
! 2. Mostly good 9. HR/DK
a
1 ` r 777..7
4. Have you or any member of your family used the Denton Public
I Library during the past year?
1
I 1. YES (ASK Q. 4a) 2. NO 9. HR/DK
{
I 14a. How would you rate Denton's library services? Would yc.u
I I rate them as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
I I
I ( 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
I -
S. Have you or a member of your family used any of n~nton's park or
I recreational facilities during the past year?
I
I 1. YES (ASK Q, 5a) 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I
I 15a. How would you rate Denton's park and recreational facil-
ities? Would you rate them as excellent, good, fair, or
I I poor?
f
I ) 1. Excellent 3. Fair
1 d 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
I
I 6. In the past year did the collectors ever miss picking up your
I trash or garbage on the scheduled pick-up days? (IF YR9 ASK)t
I About how many times did they miss scheduled pick.-ups?
I
1 1. NO, NEVER MISSED 3. YES, 3-4 TIMES
! 2. YES) 1-2 TIMES 4. YES, 5 OR 140BE 9. NR/DK
I 7. Would you be willing to pay higher rates for garbage collection
I if the rate increase vern used to develop a recycling or re-
( source recovery system?
I
! 1. YEE 2. NO 9. Wor
f S. I am going to read you a list of items. Please toll me whether
I each of the items detract from the beauty of Denton a lot, a
I little, or not at all.
I A A Not At
f Lot Little All NR/DK
I 1. Portable advertising signs 1 2 3 9
1 24 Litter and trash 1 2 3 9
I 3. Dirty neighborhoods 1 2 3 9
I 4. Junk or abandonded cars 1 2 3 9
! 5. Dilapidated or abandonded
I houses 1 2 3 9
I 6, Lack of green and open space
in busin`ss areas 1 2 3 9'
~K^,r,'J
! 84. What should be done to beautify Denton?
I
!
I
I 9. Have you or any member of your family requested the services of
I Denton's Police Department during the past year?
I
I 1. YES (ASK Q. 9a & b) 2. NO 9. NA/DK
I
I
! 19a. Now would you rate the services provided by the Police
I I Department? Would you rate them as excellent, good, fair,
! I or poor?
i !
I ! 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I ! 2. Good 40 Poor 9. HR/DK
I !
I 19b. How would you rate the job done by the officer who responded
! I to your request? Did he or she do an excellent, good, fair,
I I or poor job?
! f
! I 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. UR/DK
I
I 10. Are you aware that the Denton Police Department sponsors a
I neighborhood watch and other crime prevention programs?
I 1. YES (ASK Q. 10 alb, & c) 2. NO (SKIP TO Q. 11) 9. H8/DK
!
I
I 110a. During the past year have you participated in any of
I I Denton's crime prevention programs?
I i
I 1 1. YES, ASKS Which program 2. 00 (ASK 10b9c and Q. 11)
! I
I I (THEN ASK Q, lOb & c, 9, NR/DK
I I THEN SKIP TO Q 12)
I i.
110b. Since you know crime prevention programs are operating in
I I Denton, how safe do you feel in your neighborhood? Do you
i I feel safer than you did before the programs started, do you
I I feel about as safe, or do you feel less safe?
I I
1 1 1. Safer 2. Same 3. Less safe 9. NR/DK
I 110c. How were you made aware of Denton's crime prevention pro-
f I grams, Did you learn of them through Ndio, newspapers,
I I crime watch signs in neigborhoods, a police officer, or
! I through some other means?
I 1
I I 1. Radio 36 Signs 3, Other,
I I 26 Newspaper 4, Officer 96 N17/DK
I It. Would you be interested in learning more about Denton's crime pro-
1 vention programs?
! 1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/DK
i
1 12. How safe do you feel walking alone in your neighborhood at night?
I Do you f4e1 very safe, somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe, or very
f unsafe?
1
I I. Very safe 3. Somewhat unsafe
! 2. Safe 4. Very unsafe 9. HR/DK
I 13. The Denton Police patrol all of the neighborhoods in the city.
I How often do you see a police patrol in your neighborhood? Very
f often, often, seldom, or never?
f 1. Very often 3. Seldom (ASK 13a)
f 2. Often 4. Never (ASK 13a) V. HR/DK
I 113a. Does the fact that you seldos or never sea a police patrol
I I in your neighborhood concern you a lot, a little, or not at
1 I all?
!
f I 1. A lot 2. A little 3. Not at all 9. NR/DK
f
f
( 14. Have you or anyone in your household called the fire department
I for assistance with a fire in the past year?
I 1. YES (ASK Q. 14a) 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I
I 114s. How would you rata the servicr provided by the fire depart-
! I went? Would you rate it as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
I I 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
f f r
I
I 15. Have you or anyone in your 1,.ousehold called the fire department
I for an ambulance during the past year?
!
! I. YES (ASK Q.15a) 1. NO 9. NR/DK
1
I
I 115a. How would you rate the ambulance service? Mould you rate
I I it as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
!
I I I. excellent 3. hair
I I 2. Good 4. poor 9. NR/DK
I t
n. , e. r } ) 11 A em
r, r . 1 x`' Sn
i 16. We have talked about a number of city services so far. Nov I ae
I going to mention some of these services again. After I read each
I service please tell me whether tFat service needs much, some, cc
I r,o improvement.
! Much Some No
I Improvement Improvement Improvement NRIDK
(Garbage Collection 1 2 3 9
IStreet Maintenance 1 2 3 9
ILlbrary Services 1 2 9
(Parks and Recreation 1 2 3 9
IPolice Protection 1 2 3 9
IFire Protection 1 2 3 9
19lactric Services 1 2 3 9
IUater services 1 2 3 9
ISever Services 1 2 3 9
JUtility Billing 1 2 3 9
I 17. Now I am going to read the list of services again. This time
I please tell age which of the services you would be in favor of
I reducing if that were the only way to keep taxes and rates at
( their present level. After I read each service just say yes if
I you would favor a reduction and no if you would not favor a
I reduction.
I
I Yes, Reduce No, Don't Reduce NR/DK
I
(garbage Collection 1 2 9
IStreet Maintenance 1 2 9
ILihrary Services 1 2 9
(Parks and Becreation 1 2 9
(Police Protection 1 2 9
IFire Protection l 2 9
IElectric Services 1 2 9
IYater Services 1 2 9
ISever Services 1 2 9
(Utility 9illing 1 2 9
1
1 13. During the past year have you called the city about a loose or
I stray animal, or some other animal control problem?
I
1. YES (ASK q. 18a) 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I
I
I IlBa. How would you rate Denton's animal control services?
1 I Would you rate the services as excellent, good, fair, or
! 1 poor?
i I
( I 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NRIDK
,.a,~,v,,1 r _ w r e,. ire"T' r~y"~:e;"_° p:•I
. X,. r4rf AI,
1 19. Generally, how effective is zoning in Denton? Is it very
effec- tive, effective, or not very effective?
r
I 1. Very effective 2. Effective 3. Not very effective 9. NR/DK
r
I
1 20. Have you had any problems vith your utility billings in the past
I year?
!
I 1. YES (ASK Q 20a, b, & c) 2. NO 9. HR/DK
!
I 120a. What problem did you have?
~ I I
I I 1. INCORRECT BILLING
I ( 2. METER READING ERSOR
I I 3 PAYMENT NOT CREDITED
I I 4. RECEIVED DELINQUENT NOTICE ERRONEOUSLY
I I S. OTHER, SPECIFY
I 1 9. '(R/DK
f
I 120b. Who did you contact stout the problem?
I I
I ! 1. CUSTOMER SERVICES
I r 2. UTILITY DEPARTMENT
I i 3. CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
( I 4. OTHER, SPECIFY
I I 9. NR/DX
I
I 120c. Was the problem satisfactorily resolved?
1 I
1 I 1. YES 2. NO 3. RESPONSE NOT COMPLETE 9. NR/DK
I~_1
I
I 21. Now I would like to ask you about contacts you have had with city
I officials for reasons other than problems with utility bills.
I Hove you or any member of your household contacted the City of
I Denton about a complaint, a request for service, or for informa-
tion during the past year?
I
I 1. YES (ASK Q 21 sjbj&c) 2. NO 9. MR/DX
I
I
r 121a. Who in the city (what person or office) did you contact?
I I
I I 1. OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
I I 2. MAYOR 02 CITY COUNCIL
! ! G. POLICE
1 I 4. PLANNING AND ZONING
1 1 So COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
! I b. UTILITY SERVICES
I I 7. OTHERO SPECIFY
1 1 9, MR/DX
'sf r r e r "L 7 a ~ Y. P r,
a f t`t a s y "s . K n ~l r t. "Y t• a
r~ W > t I
c
1 121b. Were you generally satisfied with the results you got, or
f I not?
I
f I 1. Y6s, satisfied 2. Not satisfied
I ! 3. Response not complete 9, HR/DK
I. I
! 121c. Were the people you contacted courteous and helpful when
! I when you called, or not?
f !
! I 1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I
I 22. Overall, how would you rate the way the City of Dento,i is operated?
I Would you rate the way Denton is operated as excellent, good, fair,
I or poor?
I
I 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I 2. Oood 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
23. Generally, do you think that you get enough information about
I issues and problems faring the city and its citizens?
!
I 1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/DK
i
f 24. Denton has been experiencing growth in the number of houses,
! apartments, cc%mmerclal stores, and office buildings and I would
I like to ask you about this growth. Do you think the growth rate
I is too fast, about right, or too slow?
I
1. Too fast 2. About right 3. Too slow 9. NR/DK
I
I 25. Based upon your experience driving in the City of Denton, do you
I think traffic is a very serious problem, a problem, or not a prob-
lem?
I
I 1. Serious problem 2. Problem 3. Not a problem 9. NR/DK
I
26. At the present time, do you think traffic signals are set to pro-
mote the orderly flow of traffic?
I
1 1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I
f 27. Do you think the city Is doing enough to attract economic devel-
opment?
I
I 1. YES 2. NO 9. HR/DK
I 28. Are you aware that the City of Denton offers a free enery audit
I program?
i
1 1. YES 2. NO 9. NP/DK
I
f 29, Would you be in favor of an additional tax to help support Flow
I Hospital?
1 1. YKS 2. No 9. NR/DK
w v a Y. rW. ILA -.r 11
'T FT
I 30. Generally, how do you rate Denton as a place to live. Is it
ex- cellent, good, fair or poor?
I
I 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
i
31. Nov for the last few questions I would like to ask you several
things about yourself. First, do you own your home or do you rent?
I
I 1. Own 2. Rent 9. HR/DK
I
I 32. Into which of the following age groups do you fall?
I
I 1. 18-25 2. 26-35 3. 36-45 4. 46-60 5. 61 and over 9. NR/DK
I
33. How many year! of-education have you had?
I
I 1. LESS THAN 8 3. HIGH SCHOOL GRAD 5. COLLEGE GRAD OR MORE
I 2. SOME HIGH SCHOOL 4. SOME COLLEGE 9. NR/DK
I_
I 34. In what city do you work?
I
1. DENTON 3. FORT WORTH S. CARROLLTON
! 2. DALLAS 4. LEWISVILLE 6. OTHER, 9. NR/DK
I
I 35. I am going to read you several different income categories. With-
out telling me your exact income, into which category did your
I total household income for the past year fall?
I
I 1. Under 351000 4. 15,000-24,999 7. 50,000 and over
I 2. 5,000-99999 5. 251000-341999 9. NA/DK
I 3. 10+000-14,999 6. 35,000-49,999
36. To what racial or ethnic group do you lelong?
i
i 1. WHITE 2. SLACK 3. HISPANIC 4. ORIENTAL 9. HR/DK
i~
I 37. Are any members of your household physically handicapped?
I
I 1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I
I 38. What do you think can be done to make Denton a better place to
I "ive?
(Thank you very much for your time and cooperation. We believe this pro-
iject will help city officials provide better services to all citizens.
I .
IINTERVIEWERi RECORD SEX OF RES70NDENT
I
I 1. FEMALE 2. MALE 9. HR/DK
I
i .d ,rq r4 d ~ e . F t
1nEerViewer Number 1 Questions ir`p~Numb~er
tro. .
0%
DENTON CITIZEN SURVEY 1984
Respondent's Telephone Number
Contact Made on call number: 1 2 3 4 5 No Contact (Circle one)
Interview date
Hello, my name is I'm working on a project for the City c
Denton and I would like to talk with any female/ Ale age 18 or older (T4 RESPONOENI
We are conducting a survey for the City of Denton regarding citizens' feelings abou
services provided by the city. The questions that I wish to ask you will take ons}
a few minutes and your answers will be useful to the city staff and the city counci
ti as they develop the budget for next year. All of your ansl.,ers will be kept con-
fidential. Will you please take 0e time to help us?
1. INTERVIEW NOT COMPLETED
1. REFUSAL
2. NO CONTACT
3. NUMBER NOT IN SERVICE
4. OTHER, _ _ -
1 12. First how long have you lived in Denton? (DO NOT READ RESPONSES)
1. LESS THAN 3 MNTHS (TERMINATE INTERVIEW)
TO 12 MONTHS (ASK Q. 2a)
3. 1 - 5 YEARS
: 4. 6 - 10 YEARS
5. MORE THAN 10 YEARS
j NO RESPONSE (NR)/DON'T KNOW (OK)
2 I 2a. FOR THOSE WHO RESPONDED 3 TO 12 MONTHS. What was the primary reason
you moved to Denton?
1. J08/EMPLOYMENT
2. STUDENT NTSU/TWU
3. RETIREMENT
4. DENTON AS PLACE TO LIVE
5. OTHER, SPECIFY_
9 OK/NR
3 3. In teens of cleanliness, quality of houses, and general appearance, how would
you rate the condition of your neighborhood? Is the condition excellent, good
fair, or poor?
1. Excellent 3. Fair
2. Good 4. Poor- 9. NR/DK
r ~ IN o~ ~ ~ 7~y lL x .M t a M w ✓ n `,r t ~`M1n ry 5 Yh^ , r r Y S; } .e 1' ij;
` .o n v
1 1 3~ 1, 1 3 4: L e , d~, 7 .a V y r i y x
r'1 . FI 11 1 i T . !t fi 1" r1 i xl
4 4.` I would like tOlatk you- aquestion about streats in the'city._ Horn woZi~~'you
rate'the tg~idition of 'streec and "road surfaces in i:enton'i Are they in good
condition all over, mustly good, but with a few bfid spots, or are there
many bad spots?
1. Good all over 3. Many bad spots
2. Mostly good 4. NR/DK
5. Would you favor or oppose additional taxes to maintain and, where needed,
improve renton's str_ots?
1. Favor increase 2. Oppose inrroase 9. "Z/OK
(Ask Q. 5a) (Skip to 0. 6)
6 5a. How much of an increase in taxes would you accept for the
purpose of maintaining streets? Would you accept a monthly
increase of $4.00, 56.00, 58.00, or 510.00.
L1. 54.00 4. $10.00
2. $5.00 S. AS MUCH AS NECESSARY
3. $8.00 9. NR/DK
7 5. Have you or any nietaber of your family used the Denton Public Library during
the past twelve months?
1. YES (ASK QUESTION Ca) 2. NO (SKIP TO QUESTION 7)
j 6a. .11ok.; would you rr.te Denton's library services? Would you rate
them as excellent, Tood, fair, or poor?
r
1. Excellent 3. Fair
- 2. Good 4. Prior- 9. NR/DK
9 7. Have you or any member of your family used any of Denton's park and
recreational facilities during the past twelve months?
1. YES (ASK QUESTION 7a) 2. NO (SKIP TO QUESTION 8)
10 7a. ,iow di you rate the park and recreational facilities in Denton?
Do you rote them aS excellent, vend, fair, or poor?
1. Excellent 3. Fair
11 01 In the past 17 months, did th,r collectors ever miss picxing up your trash or
garbage on the sci,e~h,led pick-up days? (II' YES, ASK: About how many times
did this happen?)
1. Nn, NEVER NISSED 3. YES, 3.4 TIMES
2. YES, 1-2 TWES 4. YES, S OR MORE 9. NA/OK
"I hr, • f 'd~ ~ r. K~. , c r, a t d . ,t
9. Wouyou b'e w111`ing tp`pay .higher rates `for gaF6rge collection if the rate
12 increase were used to develop a recycling "or resource recolfery system?
1. YES 2, NO 9. NR/VK
10.1 an, going to read you a list of items. Please tell me whether each of thel tern
detract from the beauty of Denton a lot, a little, or not at all.
%-18 1, Portable advertising signs 1. A LOT 2. LITTLE 3. NOT AT ALL 9. NR/01.
2. Litter and trash in the street 1. A LOT 2. LITTLE 3. NOT AT ALL 9. NR/D1
3. Di%-ty neighborhoods 1. A LOT 2. LITTLE 3. NOT AT ALL 9. NR/01
4. Junk or abandoned cars 1. A LOT 2. LITTLE 3. NOT AT ALL 9. NR/01
5. Dilapidated or ahandonded houst 1. A LOT 2. LITTLE 3. NOT AT ALL 9. NR/0a
6. Lack of green and open space it
business area 1. A LOT 2. LITTLE 3. NOT AT ALL 9. NR/01•
I10a. What ;#xps should tho to beautify Denton?
19 11. Have you or any member of your family requested the services of
Denton's Police Department durilm the p,)sL twelve months?
1. YES (ASK QUESTION 11a b b) 2• NO (SKIP TO QUESTION 12)
Z0 lla. now would you rate the services provided by the Police
Department? Would yeu rate them as excellent, good, fair,
or n3or?
1. Excellent 3. Fair
2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/OK
llb. 1!0~~ you rate Lie lob done by the officer who resp"Ied
21 yogi ir,jeest. ^id he or she do an excellent, good, fair, or
poor Job?
1. Excellent 3. Fair
_ 2. Good 4.' Poor 9. N_R/DK
zc 12. Are you aware that the rolice Department sponsors a Neighborhood Watch ind
other cr•ire prevention programs?
1. YES, AWARE (ASK QUESTION 12a A b) 2. n0, NUT AWARE (SKIP TO QUESTION 13)
23 12a. During the past twelve month; have you participated in any of
Denton's crime prevention prugrams?
n 1. YES (ASK 12b, THEM SKIP 2. 1,10 (ASK 12b ind QUESTI014 13)
TO QUESTION 14) 9. NR/DK
, 4 rie- Since you know crim^ pr•eveiiLiun prur.arams ire of:Lratin,i in
C L'enton, how safe do you fcrl in your neighborhood? Uo you
7 feel safer than you did befure the programs started, do
you feel about a-, safe, or do you feel less safe?
1. Safer 2. Salto 3. Less Safe NR/OK
Un D tun s crime reventiun programs?
25 13. Ore yo/uu~ri~nterest n palms-itrirattt"'i
O
~NO N UA _N_
K
1. YE5- WS 2
a,Q, - tax.
15,
7777
w imp fv ~i.. 7
6.. 1. tioi safe do you fee~l.bliiiAng alone in your neighborhood at night? Do you
feel very safe, somewhat safe; somewhat unsafe, Very unsafe?
1 Very safe 3. Somewhat unsafe
2. Somewhat safe 4. Very unsafe 9. NR/OK
27 5. The Denton Police patrol all of the neighborhoods in the city. how often do yol;
see a police patrol in your neighborhood. Very often, often, seldom, or never?
1. Very often 3. Seldom
2. Often 4. Never 9. NR/OK
26 C Have you or anyone in your household called the fire department for assistance
with a fire in the past 12 months?
1. YES (ASK QUESTION 16a) 2. NO (SKIP TO QUESTION 17) 9. NR/DK
29
16a. How would you rate the service provided by the "'ire
department? Would you rate it as excellent, good, fair,
or poor?
1. Excellent 3. Fair
2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/OK
30 7, Have you or anyone in your household called the fire department for an
ambulance during the past 12 months?
1. YES (ASK QUESTION 17a) 2. NO (SKIP TO QUESTION lb) 9. NR/DK
31 17a. How would you rate the ambulance service? Would you rate it
as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
1. Excellent 3. Fair
2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DX
32-40 We have talked about a number of city services so far. Now I am going +j
mention some of these services again. After I read each service please
tell me whetter that service needs much, some or no improvement.
Much Improvement Some Improvement No Improvement NR/OK
Garbage Collection 1 2 3 9
Street Maintenance 1 2 3 9
ibrary Services 1 2 3 9
arks and Recreation Services 1 2 3 9
olive Protection 1 2 3 9
Ire Protection 1 2 3 9
lectric Services 1 2 3 9
ater Services 2 3 y
ewer Services 1 2 3 9
9w 17~ VT T
<4,~^ d .{.~i a say 9Y... 'y1G t; is a r. pp
4l 49 19. I am9~ing to read tho'list of services again. This timease'teil me `
which of the services you mould be in favor of reducing if that kwe the
only way to keel taxes and rates _a their present level. After I read each
service just say yes if you wuuld favor a reduction and no if you mould
I not favor a eeduccion.
I
Yes, Reduce No, Don't Reduce NR/DK
Garbage Collection 1 2 y
Street Maintenance 1 2 9
Library Services 1 2 9
Parks and Recreation 1 9
I Police Protection I 2 9
1 Fire Protection 1 2 9
1
Energy Services 1 2 9
Water Services 1 2 9
Sewer Services 1 2 9
20. During the past twelve months have you called the city about a loose or
stray animal, or some other animal control problem?
1. YES (ASK QUESTION 2;1 ) 2. NO (SKIP TO QUESTIM171 ) 9. NP/DK
51 ~20a. How would you rate Denton's animal control services?
'Mould you rate theiti as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
1. Excellent 3. Fair
2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
21. During the past year have you been involved in a zoning case or
dispute in your neighborhood?
1. YES (ASK Q, 21a ) 2. NO (SKIP TO Q22 ) 9. NR/DK
214. Do you think that the case was handled fairly? ,
J%
1. YES 2. NO (ASK Q.2i~ ) 9. NR/DK _
~:li. Why wasn't the case handled fairly?
j2. Generally, how effective is zoning in Denton? Is it very effective, effective
or not very effective?
1. Very effective 2. Effective 3. Not very effective 9. MR/OK
~t~a a ~ r i. ; y 1K y . 4 SGy ♦ . a e "n r'1 ~ 1' r
1c"d~ . r' 3 r1-1t0 it hied an 9 T we ve'
y problems with your i:tiIity billin s f
1. YES (ASK QUESTION 23 a,h,c } 2. NO (SKIP TO QUESTION'?' ) 9. NR/OK
,t !3~. Nhat problem did you have -
1. INCORRECT BILLING
2. METER READING ERROR
j 3. PAYMENT NOT CREDITED
i 4. RECEIVED DELINQUENT NOTICE ERRONEOUSLY
OTHFP, Specify
9. NR/UK
.:L. .!ho diJ y:u Cnntlct about ttie probler?
J/
1. CUSTO"C^ C;PVICES
2. UTILITY DEnll.T"[!:T
3. CITY OFFICE
4. 031; 2, SPI.CIFY
~JC. ;as the probler.: satisfacorily re,ol%,ed;
J~
1. YES ~%ESFO'iSE '.nT CO"I"LCTE 9.
J Now I would like to ask you about contacts you have had with city officials
I for reasons other than problems with utility bills. Have you or any member
of your household contacted the City of Denton a'Jout a complaint, request
for service, or for information in the past 12 months?
1. YES (ASK QUESTION 2aa, b, 1!NO c) 2. NO (SKIP TO QUESTION 2-) 9. 'iR/DK
C a,,. !vt,n in the city ~
(chat office or person) did you rontact.
1. OFFICE ~:F CIff '•1,1NAGER
l 2. "MAYO? OR CITY COt,NC IL
I 3. POLICE
f CITY ATTORNEY
5. MUNICIPAL COURT CLERK
5. UTILITY SERVICE _ -
1. OTHER, SPECIFY
9. hR/VK
;i Were you generally sati3fied with the results you got, or
not?
1. YES, SATISFIED 2. NOf NOT SATISFIED
3. RESPO!ISE NOT COMPLETE 9. NR/DK
'zc. Were the people you contacted courteous and helpful when
is you callod, or not?
1. YES, HELoF's 2. h0, NOT HELPFUL 9. NR/DK
Col
7
Overall, how would you rate the way tte City of Dentcn is operated? Would
you rate the way Denton is operated as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
1. Excellent J. Fair
Good 4. Poor 9. Nk; w,
Generally, do you think that you rlpt enoujh information about the issues and
problans facing the city and its citizens?
1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/CK
21. Denton has Leen experiencing growth in the numLer of houses, ararteen,s,
corr,ercial stores, and office buildings and I would like to ask you a`)out
this growt4. Do you think the building nrovth is too fast, about right,
or too slow.
1. Too fast Z. About riL,.ht 3. Too sloe; n. :1C/0K
v
2u, A its Deafen-has-fide to attract new
economic development to the city?
1. YES, AWARE 2. N09 NOT AWARE 9. NR/OK
Generally, how do you rate Denton as a place to live? Is it exr:Eilent, good,
fair, or poor?
1. Excellent 3. Fair
2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
New for the last few questions I would like to ask you several things about
yourself. First, do y3u rent your home or aparVent or do-you own your own
home?
1. REVT 2. OWN 9. NR/DK
C' ;1 Hoer old are you?
1J t3. How many years of education have you completed?_...
`i- -
y > N v f ry I i ,M > Dui vu' y •a t L. y lfiVI P v 1^
8
Are .you employed full-ti part-ti" presently unemployed, ate.-you a
7% student, or homemaker
1. Full-time (AS 0. ??a ) 4. Student (S TO Q,34 )
/ 2. Part-time ASK Q. ;;a ) 5- Nom er (SKIP TO
/ 3. Unempl ed (SKIP TO Q 6. ER, specify
NR/DK
7f 3~a in what city do you work?
t 1. Denton 4. Lewisville
2. Dallas 5. Carrollton
3. Fort Worth 6. Other
9. NR/DK
I am going to read you several different income categories. Without telling
7` me your exact income, into which category did your total household income
for the past year fail?
1. Under $5,000 5. 25,000-34,999
2. 5,000-9,999 6. 35,000-49,999
3. 10,000-149999 7. 50,000 and over
4. 15,000-249999 9. NR/OK
Ili* To what racial or ethnic group do you belong?
1. WHITE. 2. BLACK 3. HISPANIC 4. OTHER 9. :iR/DK
I`3t• Are any members of your household physically handicapped?
} 1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/Dv
hank you very much for your time and cooperation. ':e believe this project will
elp city officials provide better services to all citizens.
INTERVIEWER: RECOPO SEX nF PESPONDENT
r 1. FEMALE 2. MALE 9. NR.IUK
_J
t 7. m.' a n 5' r - y _ "a' ~ " .r r i. ti ~r. 1 s•ha f 1' i, ~'A t
s
r
r
ray ~tle h }111
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDMI /
UAD
Debra adami Drayovitch, City .:torrey
,7oe D. Norris, Assistant C"-V Attorney
Robert a, Hunter, ASSiS*,nt City Attorney
TO: Hor,rable Mayor & Members of the City Council
FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney
SI':,JECT: Ordinance Prohibiting Storage of Cars on Residential Lawns
DATE: March 29, 1985
Councilman Riddlesperger has requested the prr•pdration of an ordinance
covering the above-referenced subject. This item was considered by
the Planning & Zoning Commission on June 13, 1984. Attached is a
copy of the staff memo to the Commission and a copy of the minutes
which reflect the denial of a motion to direct the preparation of
such an ordinance.
Upon your direction, I will prepare an ordinance amending the zoning
ordinance to prohibit parking of vehicles in the front yards of single
family residences. In reviewing the Dall.s ordinance on this subject.,
I find that the outside storage of many items, not just cars, is
prohibited. Moreover, motor vehicles are allowed to be parked in the
front yards of private residences if:
a) they are operable and have valid registration; and
b) they are parked on a surface that meets the requirements
for parking surfaces; or
c) tney are registered to handicapped persons.
I am not certain that you wish to adopt these particular requirements.
I would recommend that this issue be discussed and that we prepare an
ordinance based upon your recommendations. At that point, the pro-
posed ordinance would be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission
for their recommendation and report, in accordance with Article 25 B.
(2) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Should you have any questions relative to this matter, please do not
j hesitate to call.
I
I ' &KAMA, VKAYQVf CH
DAD : ,j s
Attachments
xc:"/
Chris Har:ung
Jeff Meyer
•f'f'~ ~ .q R i CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 4. 1964
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Charles S. Watkins. Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDER DIRECTING THE STAFF TO PREPARd AN ORDINANCE
PROHIBITING PARKING OF VEHICLES IN THE FRONT YARDS OF
SINGLE ')XILY HOMES
It has come to the attention of the Planning and Community Devel-
opment Department that interest has been expressed in prohibiting'
the parking of vehicles in the front yard of single family homes.
The staff is seeking direction from the Planning and Zoning Com-
mission as to whether we should pursue development of such an
ordinance.
Charles S. Watkins
gm
0550q
1 : ) T •j -;,It 4 t.k f r i. ~ 1 ~ x. r j r:'~ do ° ~ cry. x y+~ r I r dl r?SE+tt 19
P 6 G Minutes
June 13, 1984
Page 15
E. Consider-d.irecting the staff to prepare an ordin-
ance prohibiting parking of vehicles in the front
yards of single family homes.
Mr. Claiborne made a motion to deny directing
staff to prepare an ordinance prohibiting parking
of vehicles in the front yards of single familyy
homes. Seconded by Ms. Cole. Motion carried 4-3;
(Mr. Escue, Mr. Juren and Mr. Sidor voted against
the motion).
F. Consider naming a public road located adjacent to
Evers Elementary School.
Mr. Ellison stated the Development Review Commit-
tee as well as the Historic Landmark Commission
discussed naming the road and had felt that Evers
Parkway was an appropriate name.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of
naming the public road located adjacent to Evers
Elementary School, Evers Parkway. Seconded by Mr,
Escue and unanimously carried (7-0).
G. Approval of the preliminary replat of the Haywood
Jester Addition.
Mr. Ellison stated this 0.583 acre tract is zoned
commercial (C) and is located adjacent and north
of Smith Street between Dallas Drive and Johnson
Street. The intent of the replat is to establish
a one lot resubdivision from two existing tracts
and part of lot A, block 1, Rainey Addition. He
stated water and sewer facilities are in place;
Smith Street is a public street by prescription
(40 feet in width); and five (5) additional feet
of right-of-way is being dedicated by the replat.
He furtner stated Smith Street is not an improved
street cnd would require perimeter street paving.
Mr. Tom Jester stated on Smith and Johnson
Streets, he is trying to put in mini warehouses
and stated that several other in the area do not
have curb and gutter and doesn't feel that he
should be required Lo put in curb and gutter.
r a rt,-~ ~t r _
Y ~5 'r YM'77 a
City Council Minutes A
April 2, 1985 -i--
The Council convened into the Work Session at 500 p.m. in the civil
Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart: Mayor Pro Tea Chew: Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
City Manager, City attorney and City Secretary
ABSENTS None
1. The Council held a discussion of proposed 16 lot single
family residential subdivision located south of FM 1830 and east of
Fincher Road for the purpose of determining whether to begin the
annexation process.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that the developer of this
16 lot subdivision had submitted a preliminary and final plat of the
property. Mater wells and septic lines were proposed. The lots
were located considerably south of the existing city limits. If
annexed, the City would have to provide sanitation service, animal
control, Police, Fire and all other City services.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked for the location.
Elliso,l responded that the proposed subdivision w:19 located south of
the Cos.atry Club and was in the far south of th,i extraterritorial
jurisdiction.
Mayor Stewart asked if the property was east or ees. of 1-35.
Ellison replied it was west.
Council member Stephens asked how far south of Brush Creek was the
property.
The developer responded to the question stated the proposed
subdivision was approximately 1 to 1 1/2 miles south of the Denton
Country Club.
Council Member Stephens then stated that the location wr.e very near
to the city limits line of Argyle,
Mayor Stewart asked how far Denton would have to extend the city
limits line to Rncompass this development.
Ellison responded approximately 2,000 feet.
Council Member Hopkins asked if Argyle would annex the property.
City Manager Chris Hartung responded that this particular parcel was
located well within the line of agreement which the City of Denton
had with the City of Argyle. Argyle could not annex the parcels
however, if the parcel was annexed by Denton, full services would
have to be provided and the area was quite a distance away from the
existing city limits.
Council Member Hopkins stated that unless there was some type of
agreement, Argyle would annex the property.
Ellison pointed out the parcel on a map and stated that the location
was iraide the City of Denton strip or line of agreement with
Aggyle. Argyle could not annex the paprel. Previously a concurrent
resolution with the City of Argyle hen been approved by the city
Council for property in this same area. Developments of this nature
In similar locations had been the motivation for tho Council's
appro+al of an ordinance extending the Subdivision Rules and
Regulations into the extraterritorial jurisdictton.
Hopkins motion, Alford second not to begin the annexation process at
this time. ;lotion carried unanimously.
~ ds E 1 tiP h~ n:l r~Y C
e t
C 'rv1 i Y 4~'R~ ~ Y e
d .a F.
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of April 7, 1985
Page Two
2, The council held a discussion of mobile home park
(41.6
purposedevelopment determining proposed in the for the
acres on Paige Road).
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that this proposed
development was in the eastern or southeastern quadrant of the City
near the Rollingwood Estates subdivision. There was a large amount
of unannex territory in this area with existing mobile home parks of
varying quality. A great deal of technical information regarding
drainage, etc. had been quickly forwarded In the end-s manufacturing housingband umobile rhome
This was quicY
park area. On the north aide of Paige Road was the proposed Roddy
mobile o which Council d e
considertak ngInthat portion and not all fetha unan exed area.
Council Member Stephens asked if the annexation ►,ould be involuntary.
Ellison responded that staff had not received any inquiries
regarding voluntary annexation from the residents.
Council Member Hopkins stated that it appeared he small that, protection,
the Council needed to look at annexing parcels.
Council Member Stephens stated that it had been the policy to annex
instruct staff
property to to begin annexation control whdevelompnt. The en development activit~y ibegan.
Stephens motion to begin the annexation proceedings.
Council Member McAdams stated that the Council should add the other
small parcels in this annexation.
Council Member Hopkins stated that he would amend the motion to
include the strip of land or. Sherwood south of Paige.
Ellison reported that the tract which was owned by Mr. Roddy was for
sale.
Council Member McAdams asked if that meant an annexation finger
should be extended across the road.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the Council could instruct staff
all size of unanneat a later
x land.
date, This all
would take area
Council Member Stephens stated that the Council should move
cautiously.
Council Member Hopkins stated that if the City was to extend all
services to the Rollingwood subdivision anyway, the remaining area
should be included in this annexation.
Riddlesperger second to the amendment.
Motion on the amended motion carried unanimously.
3. The Council held a discussion of coning case on an 84 acre
tract located south of I-35E and east of Lillian Miller Parkway
(2-1435).
Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported
that the ordinance which had been approved for 2-1435 was not
approved by the i.ouncil according to the Minutes.
Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that this case
had been a mass of confusion. Orgtnally the first coning case was
for the entire 94 acre tract. Mr. George Hopkins was representing
,.f}.r r c»
City of Oentor. City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page Three
Henry S. Miller for the coning change. The Planning and Zoning
commission had held a public hearing and had reduced the density on
7.5 acres from multi-family 1 to multi-family restricted. This was
what was advertised for the public hearing of the City Council. The
Council had approved the multi-family restricted with an additional
restriction that 2 rows of duplexes be added and the remainder of
the 7.5 acres could be developed as MF-R. The ordinance as approved
shows the entire 7.5 acre tract to be coned as MF-R. A legal
opinion stated that two family coning was validr however, two family
coning was not what the petitioner wanted. Staff was asking for
guidance from the City Council.
Mayor Stewart stated that the ordinance differed from the Minutes.
The Legal staff was saying that the ordinance was valid until the
Council said differently.
Counci. Member McAdams asked what the owner wanted.
Mr. McNeal, the owner, stated that he wanted MF-R on the entire 7.5
acres.
Council Member McAdams asked about the 2 rows of duplexes.
Mr. McNeal responded that it was not possible to have 2 rows of
duplexes and apartments and still have room for adequate parking.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that if the Minutes stated one
thing and the ordinance another, the ordinance was binding, if the
Council wished to reconsider the ordinance, the parcel must be
readvertised and public hearing held. The Council could waive the
foes for filing if they wished.
Council Member Stephens stated that he and Mayor Steuart were on the
city council at the time of the coning case. The reason the 2 rows
of duplexes had been added was to act as a buffer between the single
family residences and the retail area.
Council Member McA& s stated that it should be determined if the
parcel could accommodate 2 rows of duplexes and apartments.
Mayor Stewart state1 that the petition should be taken back through
the coning process 4ith a waiver of the filing fees. Council could
then reconsider the case.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, asked for guidance on how the cane
should be advertised.
Consensus was the petition should be readvertised as MF-R.
McAdams motion, Chew second to readvertiss and reconsider the 7.5
acre portion of Z-1435. Motion carried unanimously.
4. The Council received a report on Collins Street.
Rick Svehla, Ass.'stant City Manager, reported that this particular
item had teen before the Council several times. A public hearing
was held in May and the ordinance epproved by June with the
condition that Mr. Bancroft pave both sides of Collins Streat across
the frontagaaof his property. Council had Baked staff to look into
some type of pro rata agreement to repay Mr. Bancroft for the paving
coats. The Legal staff had reported that this repayment must be
done by paving assessment. Attached in the back-up material was a
map of the street. A street assessment could be done, or the City
could pay for one-half of the paving or Mr. Bancroft could pay for
all of the paving.
Council Member Stephens stated that there had been a feeling of
inequity in requiring Mr, Bancroft to pay all of the expenses, it
appeared ttsat the beet Solution was to leave the ordinance as it was
OWN
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page four
and ask abutting property owners if they would want to pay a portion
oil the paving costs.
Svehla stated that the current ordinance stated that Mr, Bancroft
_musL pave both sides of Collins Street. The City could not ask the
other property owners if they wanted to pay part of the paving
costs. The options available were to leave the ordinance as it was,
do a paving assessment or amend the ordinance to require Mr.
Bancroft to only pave the half of Collins Street which was in front
of his property.
Chew motion, Stephens second to leave the ordinance as it was.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if Mr. Bancroft would then have
to pave both sides of Collins Street.
Svehla responded yes.
Mayor Pro Tem Chew called the question.
Motion to leave the ordinance as it was failed 4 to 3 with Council
Members Alford, Hopkins, Riddiesperger and Mayor Stewart casting the
"nay" votes.
Hopkins motion, Alford second to modify the Planned Development
ordinance and require Mr. Bancroft to pave only his half of Collins
Street Sown the frontage of his property.
City Attorney Drayovitch reported that if the PD ordinance was to be
modified, public hearings would have to be held.
Motion to modify the ordinance to require Mr. Bancroft to pave only
his half of Collins Street carried 4 to 3 with Council Members
McAdams, Stephens and Chew casting the "nay" votes.
5. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
The Council then convened into the regular meeting 7sO0 p.m, in the
Council Chambers.
PRESENTS Mayor Stewart: Mayor Pro Tem Chewr Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
ABSENTi None
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of March 5, 1985 and the Regular Meeting of Aarch
19, 1985.
McAdams motion, Alford second to approve the Minutes as presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Stewart announced that agenda items #7 and 08 had been removed
from the agenda by staff.
2. Consent Agenda
Council Member Stephens asked that item 2.D.1 be removed from the
Consent Agenda,
Hopkins notion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda with the
exception of item 2.D.1. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agenda
A. Bids and Purchase Orderst
1, Bid # 9406 Electrical Meter Test Board
City of Denton City Council Minutes
keeting of April 2, 1985
Page Five
2. Bid # 9430 - Sewer Flushing Truck
3. Bid # 9432 - Material Truck Bed
4. Bid # 9434 - Trencher Trailer
S. Bid # 9437 - Sprigging, Bermuda G:ar,s
6. Bid # 9438 - Carpet, Phase III
7. Bid # 9410 - Bell/Eagle Intersection and
Woodrow/Spencer Tie-In
S. Purchase order 67724 to Jagoe Public in the
amount of 16,525.00.
B. Plats and Replatet
1. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
Schmitt and Ripy's Addition, Block D, Lot 9-R.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
2. Approval of preliminary plat of the Teasley
Center Addition, Block 1, Lot 1. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of vacation of Wooded Acres Subdivision,
Second Installment. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
C. Tax Refundso
1. Consider approval of a tax refund to Colonial
Savings and Loan in the amount of $953.86.
2. Consider approval of a tax refund to Beneficial
Standard Mortgage Company in the amount of
$3,887.51.
3. Consider approval of a tax refund to Drew
Mortgage Comp;,ny in the amount of $613.42.
4. Consider approval of a tax refund to The Goodman
Group, Inc. in the amount of $2,280.79.
REMOVED
BY
COUNCIL D. Bid on Sale of City Propartyt
1. Bid # 9427 - Sale of City owned excess
right-of-way on Carroll between
Prnirie and Highland
ouncil Member Stephens stated that he had asked the City Manager to
provide particular information on this property. He seemed to him
that who,n this was discussed previously and asked that this excess
property acquired for the enlarge of Carroll Boulevard 1,9 placed
back on the tax rolls, there were two parcels (D-33 and D-JS), The
D-35 parcel had already been soli. He thought that 0-33 was 1 tract
and now it turned out to be 2. No had asked the Manager to provide
additional information on the site of the property, There were two
different questions. One question was if there was adequate space
to ■et back from Carroll Boulevard along Highland, both from the
Carroll curb and from the adjacent property line. The other
question was if Tract A would require a new curb cut.
Cityy Mana at Chris Hartung responded that there was sufficient room
witT~ a 20 feet setback from the Carroll Boulevard right-of-way,
y i. wy r, ^ fmt'~ t. ..c w g.
Nip
G'.
a3, N
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 21 1985
Page Six
there was plenty of room to put a driveway on Highland, The answer
to the second question was that the Council would be required to
allow access to the.property. There would be a requirement for type
a drive off of Carroll for Tract A. The additional question which
Council Member Stephens had asked concerned the addition of a
section of alleyway to Tract A and staff had reminded him that when
the Council had authorised the sale of D-35, the northern half of
that section of alleyway was included. This just extended across to
meet the property that had already been disposed of.
Cuincti Member titepheus asked if this had been a 20 feet alley
originally.
Hartung responded yes.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew asked if the lots were put together, would it
then necessitate a curb cut.
Hartung responded that the owner would have to have access to the
property.
Mayor Pro Teo Chew asked if the 2 lots were put together to rake 1
tract, would there be an additional curb cut on Carroll.
Hartung responded not there was an intervening piece of property.
Tract As if .leveloped along, would require a curb cut, You could
not prevent the owner from having access to their property, The
only way the owner could get access to the property was from Carroll
Boulevard, there would have to be a curb cut.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew then stated that it was the policy of the Council
for no curb cuts on Carroll Boulevard.
Hartung replied the policy was to try to minimize the curb cuter
however, you could not prohibit someone from having access to their
property,
Council Member Stephens stated that was true if the property was
sold that way.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the Council had already agreed to
svII the property.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that the City had agreed to sell
the proprty by bid.
Council Member Stephens stated that he did not know the property
would be sold as 2 tracts.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that his personal feeling was
that, if the City advertised the property for sale and accepted bids
and the bids were made in good faith, the Council ?.ad committed
themselves to sell the property.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that his problem was that he felt the
Council was contradiction themselves) if the City was selling the
property, they would give an additional curb cut on crrroll. If
someone else already owned the property and came In for a curb cut,
it was always denied.
Council Member McAdams stated that what had been done in the past
was when there was a tract of land that bordered on a side street,
the Council had insisted that entry to the lot be from the vide. No
matter what about this particular piece of property, there was a
curb out that went with It. Sven if sold to the adjacent property
owner, it war a tract of land that was saleable by itself ani could
be resold and would still have a right to a curb cut. It was a
tract of land fronting on Carroll and tha council could not deity
that, It had bean property advertised, bids had boon taken and the
Council should sell it.
IL
City of Denton City Council Minutes
meeting of 1;,prll 2, 1985
Page Seven
Council Member Hopkins stated that he had questions regarding this
bid at the last meeting. His questions hat bran satisfactorily
answered.
' Council Member Stephens asked if Tract A could be separated from
Tract B. Could they be separated and voted on separately, Tract S
could be entered from Highland whereas Tract A would have to be
entered fr;,m Carroll with a new curb cut.
City Attorney Drayovitch reported that whether or not this could be
done would depend on how the bids were worded.
John Marshall, Purchasing Agent, reported that this was handled as 2
separate bids for 2 tracts and with 2 bidders.
Mayor Stewart stated that to was not in favor of this when the
Council started it and was still not in favor of curb cuts on
Carroll Boulevards however, this Item had been duly advertised and
bids had been processed. The Council had an obligation now to sell
the property. The issde was that the Council had decided to dispose
of the property, it had been advertised, bids had been received and
should be awarded.
Council Member McAdams stated that it had Fee n her preference not to
sell the property. However, the Council had agreed to sell it and
now the only action left was to sell it.
Council Member Stephens stated that the reason hr had brought this
up was to bring to the attention of the other Council Members that
there would be a need for a new curb cut on Carroll Boulevard.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to approve item 2.D.1 for Bid
9427. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petitions of
the City of Denton for annexation of approximately 136.58 acre:
beginning approximately 500 feet east of the center line of U.S.
Highway 377 and south of Brush Creek Road. A-11
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Lavid Ellison, Senior Planner, spoke in favor stating that staff had
no new information fcr the Council. This public hearing had been
advertised and 2 reply forms had been mailed with 0 returned. The
proposed land use was estate type housing with varying other uses
s!ach as commercial. This was an involuntary annexation and would
count against the City's 10% allowable annexable area,
Council Member Stephens asked if perhaps the owner would not be
opposed to voluntary annexation.
No one spoke in oppos:tlon.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Charlie Watkins, representing the owner, stated that the owner had
no preference as to whether the property was anrexed or not. ,
Council Member Stephens stated that if the annexation were
voluntary, it worsld not count against the City's annexable area for
this year.
B. The Council held a publl- hearing on the petition of
the City of Denton for annexation of approximately 65.12 acres
beginning 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the center line of
U.S. Highway 380 and east of Oeesling Road (Capricorn Mobile Mute
park and surrounding property), A-13
~ .`w. „ T rxh e~• r a,. r.~ 4 i ~t ,
%
f [ T~ x~~ is N dr w a e l , r ~
9 t, ~av ~.i ~ K ,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page Eight
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that :his was the site of a
proposed expansion of the Capricorn Mobile Home Park. Cne reply
form had been mailed with zero returned. The final annexation
action would be taken on June 4, 1985.
C. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
R. O. McDonnell for annexation of approximately 34.60 acres of land
situated in the M. Forrest Survey, A-.stract No. 417, and beginning
approx mately 250 feet south of and -,erpendicular to the cen:•er line
of FM 42i and approximately 2,000 feet east of Mayhill Road. A 14
The Mayor opened the public heari•.g.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the publi~ hearing,
David Ellison, Senior manner, reported that this was a voluntary
annexation. A petitio,. for a zoning change of this parcel had been
considered by the Pinning and Zoning Commission. One reply form
had been mailed am zero were returned. The next Council action
would be the institition of annexation on April 23, 1985.
D. The Cc,,ncil held a public hearing on the petition of
the City of Denton for annexation of approximately 42,35 acres of
land situated in the S. Huizar Survey, Abstract No. 514, and
beginning ap-roximately 500 feet north of and perpendicular to the
center line of U.S. Highway 360 and west of Masch Branch Road. A-15
The mayor opened the public hearing. r `
No one spoke in favor.
No r,ie spoke in opposition.
T,,e Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that this parcel was the
balance of the Tri-Steel property. One reply form had been mailed
with zero returned.
E. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Hammett 6 Nash, Inc, and the City of Denton for annexation of
approximately 150 acres of land located west of Mayhiil Road
approximately 41 AO feet north of 1-35 and adjacent and north of the
MKtT Railroad. A-17
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Cliff Stebbins, representing Andrews Corporation, spoke in favor
stating that Andrews Corporation had no objections to the annexation.
Council Member Stephens asked Mr. Stebbins if the question of the
ownership of 8 acres in this tract had been answered.
Mr. Stebbins responded that the 8 acres did belong to Andrews
Corporationt however, there were no objections to the annexation,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Heating of April 2, 1985
Page Nine
Mrs. Haggard spoke in opposition stating that her property was
agricultural and she would haves a problem. shooting coyotes if tl~e
property were in the city limits.
Council Member Stephens asked Mrs. Haggard if her property was
within this annexation tract.
Mrs. Haggard responded yes.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported t.,at this was a joint
annexation petition with a private petitioner and the City. The
petitioner had requested light industrial zoning on 50 acres of the
tract. Six reply forms had been mailed with one returned in favor
and one returned in opposition.
Council Member Stephens asked how many separate property owners
there were in the tract.
Ellison replied 6.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to proceed with the annexation.
Motion carried unanimously.
F. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Redditch Investments Corporation for annexation of approximately
60.38 acres situated in the 0. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and
beginning adjacent and east of Edwards Road. A-18
The Mayor open.l the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that 1 reply form had been
mailed with 0 returneA. This was a voluntary annexation for the
purpose of zoning ana land use control. The Council would take
final action on this annexation on June 4, 19e5.
0. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Charles Watkins, representing Spencer-Lon Venture, requesting a
change in zoning from the planned development (PD) classification to
the commercial (C) district on a 12.1 acre tract located at the
northwest corner of Spencer Road and Loop 288. The current planned
development will permit the construction o: a private utility shop
and yard. If the requost is approved, the property may be used for
any purpose permitted in the commercial (C) district by the City of
Der.:on Zoning ordinance. 2-1728
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
CLarlie Watkins, representing the petitioner, spoke In favor stating
that a portion of the site had originally been owned by the Denton
County Electric Cooperative. T7 planned development (PD-15) had
been specifically designed for tae Co-op. When the property was
divided, this portion was left. His client was requesting
commercial zoning with light industrial zoning to the north. Eight
acres to the south was zoned commercial and was a high ii,tensity
tract, The Capital Improvement Program would extend water lines to
the property and the developers felt that commercial zoning was
consistent with the plan.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
' 1.
Cl tMeeti of De ngnt Aon city council minutes
ril 2, 1985
Page Ten
Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that 5 reply
forms had been mailed with 2 returned In favor and 0 in opposition.
PD-15 had been previously approved for the Co-op for 20 acres, The
co-op had then built their facility at another location. Council
had approved an 8 Acre section for commercial toning in the original
tract. The petitioner was requesting to rezone the remaining 12
acres to commercial. This was a high intensity land use area and
the commercial zoning would be consistent with Denton Development
Guide criteria.
Council Member Stephens asked if the City was reserving sufficient
right-of-way for the enlargement of Loop 268.
Spivey responded that the right-of-way issue would be addressed
during the platting process.
Mayor Stewart asked if this was the area where the power lines went
through as it had quite a large easement.
Ernie Tullos, Assistant. Director of Utilities, responded yes.
McAdams motion, Chet second to appro+e the petition. Motion carried
unanimously.
4, Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
for the purchase matIrials, equipments supplies or
for the expenditure of funds thereforei and providing cfor
an effective date.
The following ordinance was presenteds
NO. 85-64
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AlohRDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPkIEN:, SUPPLIES
OR SERVICESI PROVIDING FOR THE EXPZND17URF OF FUNDS
THEIWrokit ).ND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams svcind to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkina "aye," Stephens "aye," klford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "eye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the awani of contracts
fe)r public works or improvementst providing for the expenditure of
fund9 thereforet and providing for an effective dare.
The following ordinance was presenteds
NO. 85-65
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR
THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR 1MPROVEMENTSt
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOREt AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. Or roil call
voto, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "eye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "eye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the
expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials,
equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of
state law exempting such purchaser from requirements of competitive
bidet And providing for an effective date,
en fi ~ t 1".! s k ^'r t':: ,r .vrrr nf'~, ~Y.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page Eleven
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 85-6b
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
EMh RGE!'_Y PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW
EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITV.E
BIDSI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart 'aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Couner'I considered adoption of an ordinance
providing for the expe-rditure of funds regarding a contract wit.h
Just Technical Associates, Inc. for a software package known as
Interactive Data Facility that will allow Data Processing to key
data from terminals.
Gary Collins, Director of Data Processing, reported that this was a
contract for software which would allow the Data Processing
Department to replace the keypunch cards and to key data from
terminals. This capability would be necessary becaase after an
anticipated upgrade to the computer system in June or July the
computer wniild no longer accept cards.
The fallowing ordinance was presented$
NO. 85-67
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
DENTON AND JUST TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR AN
INTERACTIVE DATA COLLECTION FACILITY (IDCF), AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Eopkins "eye," Stephens 'aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
E, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change of toning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) district on a track
of 31.027 acres of land situated at the southwest corner of Ryan
Road and Teasley Lane. 1-1702
Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that this was
the ordinance for a toning petition which had been previously
approved by the Council.
The following ordinance was presented
NO. 85-68
AN ORDIN"CE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP 0? THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OI' DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-10 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIhATELY 30.3595
ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE ELI PICKETT SURVEY, ABSTi=T
NO. 1018, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND SITUATED AT THE
SOUTHWESTERN CORNER OF RYAN ROAD AND TEASLEY LANE
INTERSLCTIONt ^0 PROVIDE FOR A PLANNED i,EVELOPMENT "PD"
DISTRICT ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR SAID
PROPERTYt AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, tv! ams second to adopt the ordinance. On toll call
vote McAdams `eye," Hopkins "ale," Stephens "aye,` Alford "aye,"
Ridd uperger "aye," Chew "eye, and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
s
J'E ~ r Y'~~ ~ 4,~ds' ~ pt rc M♦ i ~h'~Si .Ik 7 t~ ~~u r ~r ~i.. ~ ; !
rlMt~~•'~'!J u t , ikp T"g, ~:°I ~ ~ ~ r ~ , " f'!;~rC~~l tilb♦ i, t
city of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page TWe1Ve
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a Clxnge of coning from the agricultural (A)
clanaitication to the office (0) .district on a tract of five (5)
acres of land situated west of and abutting Masch Branch Road and
north of U.S. Highway 380. Z-11709
The following ordinance was presented,
NO. 85-69
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 5.00 ACRES
OF LAND SITUATED WEST OF AND ABUTTING MASCH BRANCH ROAD AND
NORTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380, AND MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS LM
1, BLOCK 1. TAI-STEEL HEADQUARTERS ADDITIONt TO PROVIDE FOR
AN OFFICE "0" DISTRICT ZONING CL%SSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION iOR SAID PROPERTYI AND I)ECLA.RING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Stephens motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance, On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddiesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimcusly.
0. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change of toning fro& the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) district on a tract
of approainately 37.6 acres situated west of and abutting toop 288
and north, of and abutting Audra Lane. Z-1715
The following ordinance was presented,
N0. 65-70
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DBNTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 37.600 ACRES of LAND
SITUATED WEST OF AND ABUTTING LOOP 288 AND NORTH OF AND
ABUTTING AUDRA LANE, TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNAION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
"PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION! AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephen,j motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance, On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye." Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "ayes" Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change of toning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) district on a tract
of 6.34 acres situated south of U,S. Highway 380 in the vicinity of
Cindy Lane, 7._1722
The following ordinance was presented
NO. 85-71
AN ORDINANCE AMENDINO THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTONs
TEXAS, AS DAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF fENTOJs TEXAS BY OR00A2°s"E NO,
69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 63.40 ACRES OF LI%ND
SITUATED SOUTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380 IN THE VICINITY OF CINDY
LANES TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM
AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USf
r } ,tl k ~.+@ S`s ~y a~tl` w w ~~,Cb, t n R~ r ~ ~ 6 C'4 ~ y., Y7y~~-b~~~
u ~'~i ~l9w `a ~e4°7y1 .rot i, 9 °Y,
city Of P4 or
Meeting of n ton city 1uncil Minutes
Mee
Pegs Thirteen
DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELO'JMENT "PD" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATIUNI AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Stephens Second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "eye." "Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "a e," Chew "avj," and Mayor Stewart aye.
Motion carried unanimously.
1. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change of toning from the residential single family!
sm classification .to the 714 acres residential
situated initheeF.fBatson Survay,
district a tract of 6.
Abstract 43, located e+kat and adjacent to Oreeaway Club Estates.
Z-1726
NO. SS-72
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXASs AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-AND AS APPLIES MAP A,u ABSTRACT 6.714 ACRES
OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F. BATSON SURVEY NO. 43*
DE:iTON COUNTY, TEXASt TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY
"SF-7" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO SINGLE FAMILY
"SF-10" CLASSIFICATION AY D USE FOR SAID PROPERTY1 AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, McAdams atcond to
Ho adpt"t6tephena ordinance* aye,"O Alford
call vote, McAdams "aye," Pkits o
''aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
J. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amo cod providegforl~enhanced clarity of the Animal.
Section Bill Ai,gelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported
that this was a housekeeping item. The present practice at the
Animal Control Center was that before an anirtl was redeemed by its
vaccinationpservice, be vaccinated, ifelt~that As tt.e C.ty did the ordinance n shouldfspecify
that the owner pay a veterinarian. A receipt from the vet would be
required before the animal was released.
The following ordinance use presentedn
NO. 85-73
NN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
JENTON TO PROVIDE FOR PAYMENT AND PROOF OF RABIES
IMMUNIZATIONS IMPOUNDED
AND DOGS
PROVDING CATS AS A
FOR AN EFFECTIVE CONDITION RELEASE Of SUCH ANIMAL DATE.
Stephens motion, McAdams second kits adopt" the S ordisa ce. O Alford
call vote, McAdams "aye," P
`aye," Rlddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
K. The ':ouncil considered adoption of an ordinance
providing for terrorary no parking on both sides of North Carroll
April th 27 and 28* of Fain 1gr et to Sherman Drive during
street from Fling foot
Cie Spring Bill
reported
approved Public the ouncil for
tha• this ordinancetwas similar to Director
I
the last 3 years to control traffic during the annual Spring Fling.
4.1ty I'
. I Y r 1 H i
r
4. 4~ it 1,
City of Denton City Ccwnoil Minutes
Meeting of April 20 1985
Pas# fourteen
or
and his nSamaritan o parkinge ordinance was ew uldthallowrtfort amthe ple aroom round
emergency vehicles if required.
Council Member ersons ephens stated that
at his business .duringythe had Sprl~gefling.him
regarding p parking
Angelo responded that this particular ordinance should alleviate
that problem.
The following ordinance was presented
N0. 85-74
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON BOTH
SIDES OF CARROLL BOULEVARD TWO-HUNDRED FIFTY FEET (250')
NORTH OF FAIN STREET TO SHERMAN DRIVE DURING THY. ANN,.:.:
SPRING FLING TO BE HELD APRIL 27 AND 28, 19851 PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSEI PIOVIDiNG A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO
HUNDRED DOLLARSI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DA".
McAddms motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "eye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewar' "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
L. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
canvassing the election returns for the March 23 Street Imprrvement
Bond election.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that staff was particularly
pleased with this item. The vote had been 1,S24 in favor anA 193
Opposed for $10 million in street improvement bonds. Staff had been
in contact with First Southwest Company regarding the first phase of
selling the bonds and planned to come back to the Council on April
16 with preliminary schedules.
Mayor Stewart stated that he was pleased with the vote and 'elt this
indication was an that thti citizens of
efforts to repair thestr streets, He then offered n special behind
those persons who had worked and served on the Street Committee.
Council Member Hopkins stated that, in conjunction with the money
repairs could bee street* asp yobondst the u go" Council felt
This would be
considered each year in the budget process.
The following ordinance was presented)
NO. 85-75
AN ORDINANCE CADVASSING ELECTION RETURNS OF AN ELE 7TION
HELD ON MARCH 23, 1985 ON THE ISSUANCE OF =10,0030000
STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDSI AND DEC01,11NO AN EFFECTIVE LA'T'E,
Stapnens motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye." Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
M, The Council c>nsidered adoption of an ordinance
approving the expenditure of funds for the 1985 City of Denton
Citisen's Survey.
Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager, reported that thiF. ordinance
would uautborize Jim Nitconduct the annual citizen suivey. Approximately 400 persons would
be contacted as a sample space.
@. 1 4 r 1P v r ' yi Y 'f '4Y ,;r r y Y Y rh11 ei.nTTiu
City of Denton City CoCnoII Minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page rifteen
Council Member Stephens asked if Dr. Glass could appear before the
Council at a later date to review and revue the uurvey instrument,
if ne ided.
McKean responded year this action was simply to begin the process,
The survey instrument from 1984 would be forwarded to the Council
Cot review. Discussion of the instrument would be placed on a work
session agenda.
The following ordinance was presontedr
NO. 85-76
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
DENTON AND JAMES J, GLASS FOR A 1985 DENTON CITIZEN SURVEY,
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams notion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "are," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperget "aye," Chew "aye, and Mayor Stewart "eye." Motion
carried unanimously.
N. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving an agreement providing for the sale of electric power by
the Cities of Denton, Bryan, Garland and Greanville and Brazos
Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (rrferred to as "TMPN") to Texas
Utilities Electric Company (ref:rred to as "TUEC") and authorizing
the Mayor to execute the agreement,
City Manager Chriu Hartung reported that this item had been
previously discusse<9. There had been a delay in meeting additional
requirements during the summer.
Mayor Stewart askeil if this sale would cover the revenues lost
during the shut down at TMPA,
Ernie Tullos, Assistant Director of Utilties, responded that it
would help but it would not cover all of the loss.
The following ordinance was presented,
NO. c5-77
AN ORDINANCE OF T;LF CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVING AN
AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF ELECTRIC POWER BY THE
CITIES OF DENTON# BRYAN, GARLAND AND GREENVILLE AND BRAZOS
ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. (REFERRED TO AS "TMPP") TO
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY (REFERRED TO AS "TUEC")1
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTI AND
PROVIDING VOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
5. Resolution
A. The :ouncil considered approval of a resolution
authorizing the closing of a portion of Fr Street between Oak and
Hickory Streets from BOO a.m, until MO p.m, on Saturday,
April a0, 198S tot the Sigma Alpha Mu Fraternity annual Spring
Rennaissance.
ireg Berry, Presidet of Sigma Alpha Mu , stated that the fraternity
wait requesting the support of the Council. They did reaiizr their
reeponsibiities and would honor fire lanes during the fair and would
also see to clean up after the event. Approxiestaly 50 Denton
borinrssts had reserved booths for the fair with all of the prodsods
being donated to the United Ways The day of the fair had bran
changed from Sunday to Saturday due to noise problems last year and
the clots proximity of the Grace Taiple Baptist Church.
Denton City 'Minu
city of t i
iY o
council lteetln9 o
! April 2
' 1485
Page sixteen
Council Member Riddlespergsr asked if the fraternity had considered
holding the Spring Rennaiwsance at another location.
Barry responded year however, it had proven to be ao costly.
Council Member Alford suggested the fraternity contact NTSU
regarding use of parking lots on the university grounds.
Council Member Stephens asked if permission had been obtained from
the merchants and abutting property owners.
Barry responded yes.
Council Member Riddlesp , asked if the church had volunteered to
le` the fraternity use the parking lots.
Barry responded not even though the fair was being held on a
Saturday. The fraternity had volunteered to have 2 representatives
stay at the church parking lot and turn traffic away.
Council Member Stephens coked it the City could require the
fratern :y to post •erneet money" to defray the cost of clean up if
City craws had to do it.
Council Member McAdams stated that she had attended the Sprinn?
Rennaieanee in 1984 and the fraternity had done a very good yob of
cleaning up Fry Street.
Council Member Stephens asked it the Council could have a verbal
commitment from the group to clean up the surrounding private
property, such as the church lot.
Barry responded that the church property was already in the clean up
plan for this year and then asked if the Council had any other areas
which they might want included.
City Manager Chris Hartung stated that if the Council received
complaints about this year's fair, they could always refuse to grant
the street closing next year.
Council Member McAdams stated that she felt the fraternity was
trying to resolve the problems which had occurred last year.
Council Member Alford stl.ted that he would still like to see thei
fair moved to tha university campus.
Council Member Hopkins askad if the police were on duty at the fair.
Barry responded that the University Police would be patrolling the
e4ent.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that the fraternity should
seriously consider moving the fair to another location. Fry Street
was a very confined area and the closing of the street would block
traffic.
Council Member Hopkins as%ed what provisions had been made for those
businesses on Fry Street which would be open during the lair.
4
Barry responded that these businesses had been offered the front
booths.
The following resolution was presenteds
R B 8 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, on Saturday, April 201 1986, the Sigma Alpha Mu
fraternity is sponsoring an Spr~og honalasance to be held on Pry
Street between the intersection of Oak and Hickoryl and
J '
~ y e, ~ ~ Ax h P, t x ° Y 7 x q s ➢5~ ~ r S' '~r .r~.i, i ~ 1` rte! ~ a~ ? : i'„~ ~,r M 5s y
a S~
city 6f Denton city council minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page seventeen
WHEREAS, 1111 abutting property owners of tho street have
given their permission to the temporary closing of said streets and
WHEREAS, the Spring Renaissance is open to the general
public of the City and County of Dentons and
WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for the said
Renaissance and in order to protect the safer/ of citizens who
attend, the City Council of the City of Denton deems it is necessary
to temporarily close a portion of Fry Stro., between oak Street and
Hickory Street from the hours of 8100 A.M. until 7100 P.M. on April
20, 19851 NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT REf,OLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASt
SECTION 1_
That Fry Street between Oak Strei': and Hickory Street shell
be temporarily closed as a street or public thoroughfare of any kind
or character whatever on April 20, 1965 from St00 A.M. until 700
P.M. for the purpose of holding the Sigma Alpha Mu Spring
Renaissance.
SECTION . 11.
That the portion of the above described streets shall
revert back to the City for normal traffic activity immediately from
and after 7100 P.M. on April 20, 1985,
SF^_TION III.
That this resolution shall take effect and be in full force
and effect from and after the data of its passage and approval.
i
PASSED AND APPROViD this the 2nd day of April, 1985.
RICHARD O.~SYEWLRT, HAYOR
CITY OF DENTOh, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRTTARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS O LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYt
McAdams notion that the resolution be approved, Motion died for
lack of a second.
Alford motion to deny. Motion died for lack of a second,
Council Member McAdams stated that the fraternity was asking for 1
year. They had tried to secure another location but this year's
event was partially planned. They had shown initiative In changing
the day of the fair and were trying to work with the church
regarding the day and clean up activities.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that he had reservations about closing a
public street on a business day,
McAdams motion, Riddlesporger second that the resolution approved.
Council Mombel Hopkins stated that his primary concern was the
1nterferon%:e with the business t►ade on Fry Sttest.
4•
~ M r v nf~: r~1 ;Yg s ~ 7 § Ih.'~ ° f Y •a Sh A ~ ~ e 7 :.i aiF) E
y W ~ w ~ ~ V t 1 ~ } 1 iA S 3~1 I..
City of Denton City Zouncil Minutia
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page Eighteen
on toll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye,"
Alfor3 "nay," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "nay," and Mayor Stewart
"aye." Motion carried S to 2 with Council Member Alford and Mayor
Pro Tom Chew casting the "nay" votes.
B. The Council considered approval of a resolution
approving a commercial operators lease agreement with Jay D. Rodgers
and Aruce Brown.
Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Work*, reported
that this proposed lease was for 4.14 acres at an approximate cost
of 70 per square foot. Mr. Rodgers and Mr. Brown intended to
construct large hangars to be oub!st to businesses.
The following resolution was presentedi
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the City of Uentcn owns property available for
lease at the Denton Municipal Airports and
WHEREAS, Jay D. Rodgers and Bruce Brown, a Texas
partnership, desire to lease property at the Denton Municipal
Airport and to use the same for hanger construction, hangar rental
and related aeronauLical purposest and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires to lease property upon
the Airport for such purposesr and
WHEREAS, the Airport Advisory Board has reviewed and
recommended approval of the attached proposed leans agreesentt NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THATs
SECTION I.
The Airport Lease Agreement (Commercial operator) between
the City of Denton and Jay D, Rodgers and Bruce Brown, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is herisby approved.
SECTION II_
The Mayor Is hereby authorised to execute t•is attached
lease agreement on behalf of the City.
SECTION-III.
This Resolution shall be effective immed..:tely upon its
passame and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of April, 19BS.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTE S"' s
~
all"CRITA
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS rk) LEOAL FORME
DEBRA ADAM? DRAY,)VITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Bye
• 5 r! 3 q 1~'qv ad.'s i i r yAs ra''~ "S I4 lea t 3~ "I} h sr' t i? ~'~-4,°
City of Denton City council minutes
Meeting of April 70 1985
Page Nineteen
Hopkins motion, McAdams second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "Aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered approval of a resolution
adopting the North Central Texas Council of r3overnments's standard
specifications.
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, reported that this was the
result of a lengthy process. The City of Denton specifications had
been incorporated with those of many other area cities. Twenty
cities had already approved the standard specifications and
approximately fifteen other cities were considering them.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he felt this was a step
forward, These standard specifications for tt.e entire north central
Texas area would be an asset to contractors.
Council Member Stephens asked if the North Central Texas Council of
Governments was also looking at standard specifications for
buildings and electrical work.
Svehla responded that most cities used the national building and
elactrical codes.
The following resolution was prosenteds
RE 8OLUT_I ON
WHEREAS, the City Council has determin, that it would be
advisable and be in the beat interest of the City of Denton to adopt
specifications for public works projects consistent with
specifications used by other North Central Texts ritiest NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
SECTION I.
That the Standard S cifications for Public Works
Construction, North reat7ra7" exam an3 - ey are here y a opt^-e3 as
tie specTtrcatToni -foi uea In connection with future public works,
water utility, and private development projects for the City of
Denton, Texas.
SECTION It.
That the Paving, Drainage, Water and Sewer Specifications
presently in effect aad used by the Department of Public Work!
remain in effect for all public works projects advertised, bid upon
or under contract prior to the effective date of this resolution
until final acceptance by the City.
SECTION III,
That the Paving, Drainage, Water and Sewer Specification*
presently in effect and used by the Department of `ublic Works be
rescinded upon the final acceptance of all projects ,•vertised, bis
upon, or under contract prior to the effective date of this
resolution.
SECTION IV:
That as official addendums to the Standard specifications
for Public Works Construction, North Central Texas are published#
II i erl a'uFoe'aeice`II'y e3op~i7`ae a den3ii'Fo the specifications
for use in connection with future public Burks, water utility, and
private development projects for the City or' Denton.
" ~ Sa•~, e,gT , a 1w ~ ti,- . 7,(N ZyJS -.S i` ~~V ~ k ~Y.k ~ ¢~~3 I nj Mv~~K ~ 4~•u~ .....r,~. ~ 1l
•K°l ff ~~4'~d. ti '~}elk ',lam T~~i v V,~ ;,f o h 1
w 1.~ e~ ~f~ YYn
City of`Aenb)n city council minutes "
Meeting of April 20 1985
Ps;,* Twenty
SET.e LON V.
That as future editions of the Standard Specifications for
Public Works Constructions North Central Tax&$ are p-i. t&hFd, eFie
coil recnt"ealrTori wi11' eieby-"6e ec ~P 0 as-ETis Spe,lifications for
use in connection with future t-ublic works, water utility, and
private development projects for the City of Denton.
SECTION VI.
That as 'uture editions of the Standard Specifications for
Public Works Construction North Central Texas are--pu`bY et'i-ie?, - l;
e'a;tTon o?~-tTie` 'specT~~catlfo`ns In e~~act` at--Mo time that the next
edition is published be in effect for all public works, water
utility, and private development projects advertised, bid upon, or
under contract prior to the effective date of the next editions and
remain in effect for these projects until their final acceptance b/
the City.
SECTION VII.
That as future editions of the Standard Specifications for
Public Works Construction North Ventre exas are pub-YTsTied, Mo
e3lE76n ,6r-tTi 3pecir•icaiio`n`s Zn ~T1-*ct""-&M'T0 time that the next
edition is published be rescinded upon the final acceptance of all
public works, water utility, and private development projects
advertised, bid upon, or under contract prior to the effective dt.i
of the next editioT. of the Specifications.
SECTION VIII_
That the effective data of addendums and the second and all
other future editions of the Standard _Specifications for Public
raf~'lixai-5e--eitToY three eont~i roe
Works Constructions North_ Cent
tia-'ay-Lti-a!im; -Croy race vac 0 cial notification about the
exigence of the addendum or the newrst edition to be published.
SECTION IX.
That the City Secretary, the City Engineer and the Director
of Public Works be and they are hereby directed to place a conformed
copy of the specifications hereby adopted or any future addendume
of, or editions to, the a-,,ecificattons that will be hereby adopted
in their permanent files for public inspection.
SECTION X.
That this re,r, ution shall become effective immediately
upon its passage and app►,val.
PASSEn Ai.u APPROVED this the 2nd day of April, 1985.
WfiXWO-. STENARC, uu4o1
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTe
f
ew►-RLS~~~-a~t~; -~~€~~x~4
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEOF.L FOPMs
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, 'T'EXAS
sy e .
a
city of Denton City Council minutes
Meeting of April 3, 1985
Page Twenty-One
Riddleeperger motion. McAdams second that the resolution be
approved. On roll call vcdte, Mcmars "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens
"aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger `aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor
Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered approval of a resolution
opposing Senate Bill 134 regarding the publication of intent to
annex.
Council Member Stephens left the meeting.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this proposed legislation
was detrimental to three cities which were trying to control growth
and land use through annexation.
The following resolution was presentedt
R E 9 O_L U T_1_0 N
WHEREAS, Senate Bill No. 134 has been filed and is
currently before the Senate of the State of Texas) and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill No. 134 would amend the Municipal
Annexation Act (Article 970x, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) t.%
require cities to publish, one year before the date on which it
proposes to institute annexation proceedings Cot an area, a public
notice of such p•.-oposed annexations and
WHEREAS, a requirement that a city publish notice one year
in advance of any proposed annexation would greatly hamper a city's
ability to control and regulate future development and to plan for
the orderly growth of the citys and
WHEREAS, such a notice requirement would not be in the best
interest of the public or the municipal governments of the statist
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CIT v OF DENTONs
o^ECTION I.
That the City of ncnton, Texas, opposes Senate Bill 134 and
hereby urges and calls upon its elected Representatives and Senates
of the State of Texas to oppose passage of said legis:ation.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of April, 198%.
RTCiA D O. STEWXmT, MAro A
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTf
ZFiATLMMITIR; UTY-I€ZMM?
C1TY OF DENTON# TEXAS
APPROVEDL AS TO LEGAL FORM]
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Hopkins motion, Alford second i+,at the resolution be approved. On
roll. call vote, McAdams "a. " Hopkins "eye," Alford "aye,"
k'Jdlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
- t M M Y I,b R. ° 3 1 Y r ixe w hh 7 r ,ti i 1Ft 4.
7e,~ / ,ri •P ,r 6 f i l~dr
City of Denton city council minutes
matting of April 20 1985
Page Twenty-Two
E. The Council considered approval of a resolution
supporting Senate Bill 1032 and House Bill 1634 regarding the
expansion of service areas for municipally owned electric utilities.
Council Member Stephens joined the meeting,
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this particular issue had
not been a problem for the City of Denton. When Denton applied for
the Certificate of Convenience and Necessity, it was requested and
granted that the municipal utilities could serve those areas for 2
miles in all directions in the extraterritorial jurisdiction. other
TMPA cities, how0ver, would suffer if these bills were not approved
by the state legislature.
The following resolution was presenteds
RE 80 L_U T 10N
WHEREAS, Municipally owned electric utilities have been
totally unsuccessful in securing amended applications for
Certificates of Convenience and Necessity from the Public Utility
Commi3sion to serve their citizen owners in newly annexed areact and
WHEREAS, Legislation has been introduced in the House and
Senate in the fora 'f H.B. 1634 and S.B. 1032 which Legislation
would help allavlate the aforeventioned problemt and
WHEREAS, the inability of municipally owned electric
ttilities to expand service areas greatly impairs the financial
integrity of said municipally owned ucilitiest
NOWe 76:QEFOtE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY of DEFrONi
That the City Council of the City of Denton unanimously
supports the passage of H.B. 1634 and S.B. 1032.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of April,
[ttrC`A~~a-a: a~L~x~r; t ga;~
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
C`r`7H RLOTT"E ALLEN, CITY SECRET AY
CITY OF DENTONe TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYe
Hopkins motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens `aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "xyee" and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
P. The Council considered approval of a resolution
approving an employment agreement with the City Attorney,
Tho. following resolution was presentedt
RE S0LUT_I ON
WHEREAae the City Attorney of the City of Denton is
appointed to office by the City Council and serves at the pleasure
of the City Council under the terms and provisions of Article V1 oC
the Charter of the City of Denton, Texast and
`i
It 1 ~ rl.~ t ~ f ~ a ~ 1rt ~
city of Canton City Courigil tiinutes
Meeting of April 20. 1985
Page Twenty-Throb
WHEREAS, on February S, 1965 the City Council of the City
of Denton appointGJ uebre Adami Drayovitch, City Attorney of the
City of Denton, Texasr
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTONI
SECTION I_
The City Council of the City of Denton hereby engages the
employment services of Debra Adami Drayovitch .:s City Attorney of
the City of Denton, Texas, to perform the functions and duties
specified in the City Charter, the City Code, and the laws of the
State of Texas, and to perform such other legally pereissibl` ind
proper duties and functions as the City Council shall from time to
time assign.
SECTION It.
The City Council agrees to pay Debra Adami Drayovitch for
her services r. annual base salary of $46,600.00 payable in
installments st the same time as other employees of the City are
paid and $100.00 per month car allowance. The out of 84,000.00
shall be pail for relocation expenses.
sECTION III.
An annual performance review will be conducted by the City
Council durinq the month of October of each year, and th s, City
Council agrees to increase said base salary, fringe or other
benefits in such amounts and to such an extent is the City Council
may determine that it is lesirdble to do so on the basis of the
annual performance review jade at the same time as similar
consideration is given to other employees of the City.
SECPIOV IV.
It is recognized that the City Attorney has to devote a
great deal of her time outside normal office hours to business of
the City, and to that otnd, the City Attorney will be allowed to :aks
compensatory time off as she shall deem appropriate during said
normal office hourst provided, however, the City Attorney shall
devote her entire time to the performance if the duties and shall
not spend more than to: ;:O) hours per week in oeaching, consulting,
or other non-City connected business without the prior approval of
the City Council.
The City Council hereby agrees to budget and pay the travel
and subsistence -xpenses of the City Attorney for professional and
official development and to adequately ;pursue necessary official and
other functions for the Ci!y, including but not limited to the
Annual Coaference of the Municipal Law Officers, City Attorney s
Association and such other nations., regional, state or local
governmental groups and committees thereof which the City Attorney
serves as a member.
The City Council also agrees to budget Into pay for the
travel and subelstsnce expenses of the City :•ttarney for short
courses, institut.s and seminars that are necessary for her
professional development arnl for the good of the City of Denton.
The City Council agrees to budget and pay the professional
dues and subscriptions of the City Attorney necessary for her
continuation and full participation, including the holding of
responsible offices in national, regional, state and local
associations and organizations necessary and desirable for her
continued professional participation, growth and advancement, and
for the good of ine City of Denton,
aim
^ s,^7-' I ' y r i^ t '11-011
4 ',y. ' ! a ,.f' e u
? c •~';u , 6 7 w ^.1 a i i kt-
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Page Twenty-Four ,
SECTION V.
Before voluntarily resigning her position, Debra Adami
Drayovitch, agrees to give the City Council at least thirty (30)
days notice in writing of her intention to resign, stating the
reasons therefore.
In the event of her involuntary separation as City
Attorney, she shall be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal
to sixty (60) days aggregate salary; provided, however, that in the
event of her termination because of her conviction for any offense
involving moral turpitude or any illegal ict lnvolvi.,g personal gain
to her, then, in that event, the City shall have no obligation to
pay the aggregate severance sum designated herein.
Involuntary separation as used in this paragraph means her
discharge or dismissal by the City Council or her resignation
following a reduction in salary or other financial benefits of the
City Attorney in a greater percentage than an applicable across-the-
board reduction for all City employees or in the event the City
refusev following a written notice to comply with any other
provisions benefiting the City Attorney herein or the City Attorney
resigns, following a suggestion, whether formal or informal, by the
City Cvuncil that she resign, then, in that event, tle City Attorney
may at her option be deemed to be "terminated" at the date of such
reductinn or i.'.ch refusal to comply within the meaning and context
of the herein severance ;:ay provision.
SECTION V1.
All provisions of the City Charter, City Code, and Rules
and Regulations of the City adopted by the City Council relating to
vacation. and sick leave, retirement and pension system
contributions, holidays, and other fringe benefits and .or~.In2
conditions as they now exist or hereafter may be amended, shall
apply to the City Attorney as they would to other employees of the
City, in addition to said benefits enumerated specifically for the
benefit of the City Attorney, except as herein providrnl. The City
Attorney shall bs entitled to receive the sore :acatian and sick
leave benefits as are acenrded other department heads, including
provisions governing accrual and payment therefore on termination of
employment.
SECTION VII.
This agreement shall be effective for a period of one year.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of April, 1985.
a
11UrRR5 O. 6TE;'IRIs-MTYO1
CITY OF DENTGN, TEXAS
ATTEST!
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEOAI, FORM!
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEX6.S
BYe
Hopkins motion, Alford second that the resolution be approved, On
roll call vote, McAdam;! "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlespergee "aye," Chew "eye," and Mayor Stewart "aya,"
Motion carried unanieou3ly.
} w T$[ b ,T S r r-mv ;i ~ :rF ♦ 66~ 5 ~r r-}: , s~ 'l ~"1 4 .t LM
w
yD rX~X A ~ #°.F f ! °a~ ~ 9 ~ ~ t ~ Jb t y ~r?y Y ~ P Y
r d e
l A f .F !
city of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 2, 1985
Pag: Twenty-Five
64 The Council considered authoritipg the Spring Fling
Committee to hang banners over various City streets advertising the
1985 Spring Fling.
City Manager Chris Hartuag reported that the Council traditionally
had approved the hanging of banners over City streets to advertise
the Spring Fling.
McAdams motion, Chew second to authorise the Spring Fling Committee
to hang banners over various City streets to advertise the 1985
Spring Fling. Motion carried unanimously.
7. The Council was to have considered removing toning case
2-1675 from the table.
This item was scmoved from the agenda by staff.
a. The Council was to have considered the petition of
Christopher Bancroft requesting a change in toning from the
agricultur%l (A) classification to the planned development (PD)
district ov a 19.39 acre tract located on the south Bide of Parvin
Road approximately 1,500 feet east of Bonnie Brae Road. if
approved, the planned development will permit 71 lots for single
family detached use (minimum lot site 7,000 square feet) and a two
acre tract reserved for a private school. 2-1675
This item was removed from the agenda by stafr.
91 There was no official action on Executive Session items of
legal matters, real estate, personnel, or board appointments.
10. New Business
No items of new business were suggested by Council Members for
future agendas.
The Council reconvened ',`o the Executive Session to discuss legal
matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
1ICHAJV11 0. sTZ_WXff; MA-VOK
CAF.ALBfi'tE-xLLLii; -ZT'P4~~TiiTAAS'
0774s
~'kf w rnr f T'K ;a v ry •.'r d i. t~ i r2n i v;' ~z.~ i.
assn i tv, F"!15 ~r k{, w: 4 .4 •t'- r°'
} r
ABM SS id ~ ~ /r a
a
city Council IO nutas
April 9, 1985
The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at 7100 p.m. in
the Council Chambers.
PRESENTS Mayor Stewarti Mayor Pro Tam Chewt Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENTS None
Mayor Stewart recognized Mr. J. P. Phillipa, Mayor Pro Tom of the
City of Carlsbad, New Mexico who was in the audience.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance canvassing
the results of the April 6, 1985 City OW-or election.
The following ordinance was presentedo
NO. 85-70
AN ORDINANCE CANVASSING THE RETURNS AND DECLARING THE
RESULTS OF THE REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY
OF DENTON ON AIAIL 6, 1985
Riddlesperger motion, Chow second to adopt the ordinance.
Mayor Stewart read the election results as followat
PLACE It
Harry Eaddy 137
Mark R. Chow 281
PLACE 21
Joe Alford 480
Virgil C. Adams 321
PLACE 31
Jim Riddlesperger 261
PLACE 41
s
Ray Stephens 171
Ray Mackin I
The following candidates were declared to be elected
FOR PLACE Is Mark R, Chew
FOR PLACE 21 Joe Alford
FOR PLACE 31 Jim Riddlesperger
FOR PLACE 4j Ray Stephens
On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew and Mayor Stewart
"aye." Motion carri*0 unanimously.
2. The Council then held the administration of the oath of
office to the newly elected City Council members.
Ct:.rlotte Allen, City Secretary, administered the oath of office to
Mark R. Chew, Joe Alford, Jim Riddlesperger and Ray Stephens.
3. The Council considered selection of the Mayor Pro Tem.
Council Member Alford nominated Charles Hopkins,
77 r .F-7t ti rc? et i r F. r n 'a
City of benton city Council h'inutes
Meeting of April 9, 1985
Page Two
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second that the nominations cease and
Hopkins be elected by acclamation. Motion to cease nominations
carried unanimously.
Motion to elect Charles Hopkins Mayor Pro Tem by acclamation carried
unanimously.
4. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
With no further itens of business, the meeting was adjourned.
Atca+Rb-a: ~i lCft'P`~it 4aT~
07'!Ss
DATE 04/16/85
CITY COUNCIL Rang rOWT
44 08*
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLATS AND REPLATS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the
following:
1. Bell Addition - Preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block 1
2. A. 1. Bell Addition - Final replat of Lots 6, 7, and 8,
Block 2
3. JBC Addition - Preliminary replat of Lot 3B, Block 1
4. Life Tabernacle Church Addition - Preliminary plat of Lot Is
B--ick 1
S. Naughton Place Addition - Preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block 1
6. Redman Addition - Preliminary replat of Lot IR, block 2
7. Cedar Creek Addition - Preliminary plat of Lots 1-16, Block 1
4 R
BACKGROUND:
PROGRAMS, _DEPARTRENT3 OR CROUgS AFF TED:
FISCAL IMPACT.,
Not applicable
Respectfully submitt
G. Chria Hartung
City Manager
Prepared byt
Cottle Carson
Urban Planner
App v
Jeff No
DireetoO of Planning
CoWUhity Development
0772
s n h n ,1 u. x 3 q r1 1 (
d ~ 1 rr? " r,
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: April 16, 1965
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of Bell Addition
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 1.00 acres situated west of
and abutting Duncan Street, south of Smith
street and more fully described as Lot 1, Block
1 and shown in the S.C. Hiram Survey. This site
is zoned commercial and commercial type
development is anticipated.
Water, electric, telephone, and solid waste
services and facilities are adequste and
available. Sanitary sewer capacity is, however,
limited at this location and the developer will
only be allowed to connect up to five (5)
toilets tc the existing sanitary sewer line.
Additional toilets may be connected after the
completion of the John Pass sewer line.
ACTION REOUIREDt Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATI N: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
C (CA (A
ceclli-Carson
Urban Planner
0696j(2)
Mttr ~c ""'~"6'
NpNTr wu
. .4.A. M1 IIi
.rlr
L. X d'a rry
t,rr,r•.nivr
Aa~'Y
x I
/101
[Atr Itl rlt 0
f}41.a lte•Y1 OVAUM AIR
HAT
. ro nn~A• i.~w~.+s .nt N unn.p
rtu YrrlrrOM
.r.. Pla'h.a as
s .1 u.. aa.• r. NJ..d.n uY r-.r.Y v . " n, " ` ;,y(~J lolerMOMaut
rlwrN It YL ►J. true "a 140p 6w C
YWW!ItMIIT MtI
I,nv•a+. ethrloft1.JAA$66t w..r.w
i
1.00 ACM/ IM M WI YMO BUM DOWNEERlNb
4
coulnr a etrTOM nut trr.41 runt, r t.
CMIltrlew vftl"owtm t
II~~t1Y I uwk% m"r. 11}1. 1,..,
00
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: April 16, 1985
SUBJECT: Final Replat of the A. E. Bell Addition, Lot 6,
7 and 8. Block 2
SUMMARY: This is a 0.475 acre tract. This tract is more
fully described as Lots 6. 7 and 8, Block 2 and
shown in the BBB & CRR Survey, Abstract 185,
Denton, Texas. The property is zoned multi-
family, and a multi-family development is
anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
The reason for the replat is to remove two lot
lines and create one lot.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Denial of the replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
0'( CA, (A Ca
Cecile Carson
Urban P1?nner
lllog/8
.i
mrl1 I
1016 r Ir" llt
laiat S/.Or 11Ni Ks r'r w ! a all .wY frr ~ r .Irofr Y r
% *a CRa a.B, 1.+. r"~+r. r 1, is r r trra moo 1r~
"Ro d of nrf Vr t
wrSr L.ut/raY1Wa.1.llr wit IN
I a
4 r ell ` r rl.l Sl.r•1 ol.1r Y raWo Ul r id f r ~ AM l f Biola vatoft :I
tr N yol ftf of r r1P1 w f.rol rab a.•rr M w V ~ wa
r. .a' it V hrirw r "o, aau Flavor tr•Hr Y f.M *a to W or ft &.a tra
ql ol..r N11! two 1r1ol.w Pw
f 1ta« ao... tf+a a.roJ•ol w olnPLr « r
Seam sot r Straw; Ia..e r r low to\a Slew %"6% a A, Ir+w 4w a N
" Ya.•ol 414m, at AN a6141 w r yarn 0~ f r Poll BiP4 rrt • Raw r t+•fi11
!w d /r emu
rdit rA r war 6linollr 11. fla of r rrBi t/la ! b W M `t r Pol 1 ed
o4a r Avrov, at ~f, r all Ils,lla:l a awl of MO" it a two rI w Ad r lra• :
WICINITy a.d
"a two r Novel a frra r loop; Lt tear 44Itr f a. all w Bad as rot
! itolrtdf II.SINTa.1fa r*t11rarat wwra•M'
l co 1 - f , L O T . j 1 0 1 L 0 f M rer d ft Wll..WM 61o" bk Yft rIYMSprrYM ba+1
I T .ettl•rlr lalMrYw• "
2jT f fOltaW rlrr 111Ww71 bAaM W/erlW Sr fSllrL awP.rrr
y laOa ! INfSf1 I$%% p114f 11.f arWYn1r1W1a1r PN11sa rr1l tl.lara Rrr4r«MY
11.14 •tl :All .\t rolM hf.aHrl 04welPr•.1. YYar lwrt Oa
IL 0 C j R N t ~•urall a.e Swlrwulw rq e. rlSwrfw s.a
flr0flop■Bi/fr r14..1 MtPOer Y.1 olahMeolf"Me rr
a~ N.f 'fl'Ooo a.
SMf wrollMl./a W1«1rw Nnl ra«laww•6ArN oft P-0
i /a' /o' 1, : _ ■aaxlmew«S.Ir aOlf.aa•r L.L
f 1 141.1' 1 ~a / ;
N~•• Is f A. BI E L L IA V 0 1 T 1 0 N
W r.I its 841 11.10, mmw Olrummila lllsm
,.1 L 0 T a 1 O f r i L C T a L 0 T lea a 00"" MR me r feolr 40 P1f rla trY+rla t r op ea.• aa... as
I`: W I - 1 NafN Jr IN fur 1 • f. ell 1 `t low a.1f. UN w r %awR blows Y r •alla
. oar I I pp /.w. h SsM eWP•rrr wYf P1lY awa Iw faar
rult
~.clla Pali at
I A
A
1
8. B B C R, j R. C 0, S u 1 R.
_ 1 ~ 1tli f iRo
J A.. f. TELL ADOITION mlar e. Nra
- f • Wa a •.n11d rxq Wv, H w h W r.nn w aP.a s r all ar•lrll
01 ~_I ~ ~ ~ Ps+lr \aala 16v ISIY v..l r e r r w ,ana r .a.altf r s ra.r
• O • • rer.aa. w YarPlrfa a . 1r. h •PMr a• M M h Top w r•alf.L Mfr
a L I10 T I R . C L O C K t = .,,..y w Y h Pa.de a.f.l. w.r
a ~ a
r *AN atrl r ¢r umrAfMUfOral T9 ad a' -.t>d
it r w
' rPf llfit htflP wv WW%NhLnr4a
l
{ SIIIft t1.tf -at Bows" Alit.
S ,
= i 1 fit I Itl i 1. \ ~ .
on" clillou
A x B. I N.F 0 ! 8 S Bill tL wNo 11 "a moo
Ld dela.ol arr !.roll. r tad: MOO as /r iu fit • f
> L-~~w 4 low a RAW1 ae opal w r rrl r M«ia ta w a Booa•f 1n 1M w r oar Bill La Pa ON
~aea I N.1a Y orw, ~.Ar fa awa of r all
of bow,
MIS Ll.L A, ift
L H'11'01• r. II11.60'
SCHMITZ AVENUE Biter rltutt• , I
116 a. a. W.
La nafltt j A. E. BELL ADDITION
j LOT t'N. 1 •60CK 2.
100 A °RL/ All os %#,I 1,1 f''s
I E ' t IN *L004 I A. t DELL A00111411
I CITY W OEMTON
OLNTON COIJItTV. TEXAS
w .►a•arll u
.r.P tllt Cllr }Affttllj'~1
' 1 lftilOrt . ilt
~ nt~, root" rtf.t.
l
1.1.. i , eALt HBCoEIV$G AFRO 41985 a•;, ✓ r. al tta
(
t,1 it Vaal 10 41a 1 1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: April 16, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary replat of the JBC
Addition, Lot 3-A, Block 1
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 1.56 acres situated north of
Collins Street and west of Johnson Street and
shown in the Alexander Hill Survey, Abstract
A-623. '?he site is zoned commercial (C). The
purpose of the replat is to remove existing lot
lines to create one lot.
Water, telephone, electric, gas, and solid
waste services and facilities are adequate and
available. Sanitary sewer is, however, limited
at this location and the developer would be
required to sign an agreement with the Director
of Public Utilities for dry type uses on this
site.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recorlmends
approval of the JBC Addition, Lot 3-A, Block 1.
ALTERNATIVE: Denial of preliminary replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
I
Lu. h
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
0663] +
NIYt 0.00 tKe1 W Yrll poor vmlNb G ~
NOU rr 'r 17'
Wr
1" ' I
toes
ewte +j I
~ ~ Yrti4N\ 11~~
i
~y 1 1
• ^Wfh' / • Wf ~ It 10
I VV
'1 ' • ~t11•X. ~_I
/ be ff 4ppf 1
i
/44,
MO* , I
PREUMINARY R g"?
RQ ADDITION
•MFn twr".~rr•rwr
I
PIA `r Lo
~ ~ ~ JEST9~t
' / ,.~1 frtl « c.rr u _ & JOE Il BELF N
T .1. .-r-. l I~fet 000
ter-. ~y ~'..r llgdh~ t • - r r.. •M r.~ Omm "*A 1 ~-Gbm
7 C,u~ f I.M.k trw !•w• : I Et~GINFER
V ; Vtsrw
4 I \ Ir6i vr.'r ~uf:
/ 1 ' ~ it 1 Joy
r ,.~.1 $ IBC Iy I V E~;
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: April 16, 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary plat of the Life Tabernacle Church
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1
SUMMARY: This tract is 10.00 acres located at the north-
west corner of Bonnie Brae Street and Payne
Drive. This tract is more fully described as
Lot 1, Block 1 and shown in the Francis Batson
Survey, Abstract 43, Denton, Texas. The proper^y
is toned agriculture; and the development of a
church is anticipated.
City services and facilities, inclLding water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste, are available"
The developer has requested a variance of
drainage improvements and perimeter street
paving. If the variance is not a~ roved these
items must be addressed in the fi:ial plat stage.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat subject to the
following conditions:
1. Drainage improvements will be required.
2. Perimeter street paving will be required,
right-of-way will be addressed during final
platting stage.
ALTERNATIVE: Denial of the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
i A4 ~
ec a arson
Urban Planner
0761s
Slltl Of fu41 1
(01•Wtl of I11 O* 1
W111tu, AN. FAIL STRAW. 11 Al. too 711 010162 ON 4 16M AM
t11Lt 10 fit rllirll 141100 S01WITr AIATtACt 4). till UI Cecile
Or 110101, }0141. AND 11100 ALL OF A C1I1111 fCAIL[01 3I. Of ►C11
ryACT AS ►PCILa01 IS A 1111 0101 0111 C40144 A41 SILL NAIT11 t0
FAIT f14AM, Il AL, 00 rtt life Ill WO MN 1111. 01CO1090 to
VOLAY1 014, 01.1 401, 1111 Itt O/01 Or 0110 COCIII. 011 tiles tau
091.01 01/C11AIA H f0lttYlA
J1f111 LJ11 If4f 1r:K It }A6 $OY is I Alt 900111 ut SAID 11.041 Otis felt? At
u9 T•1 turtrl rte INTIISI[TI01 Or 100111 ItA1 Iftett ARM, pilot
\ 041163
tared } N 101111.6 NOA14 61 0140911 41 0110162 14 $490019 0111 AL►NC fit
J I D C01T41•1.111 OF 1 VC4NC 0041 IfAINI 6119[1 A 611162Ct Oa 641.1(
pall"
• Toilet NO11T1 It Bic IL/1 II Al lattl 41 It cc 011 tilt SAW" At
14.11 0991 ral OONrM 11141•rt-101 Of 1011 1011,(0 11A1 A ?6tfiL 11111AICI
\ retell it 141.11 tat to it Item Itel
\ 7q/.1 90011 97 11atILS 41 0110[11 16 11:00)1 141t 41000 A ►4K4
F1191ID Af 4!4.11 Fitt 1Al at)t 114111-at-TAf of A ►T1Lte 01St a
I T014L IlA144L1 or 01a,1/ fill IS foe Cu TU or A FIILIC 0162•.
r t11p(r 01t1W [a 01L11p1 It N111t111 it 14010111 Ntli ALUC toe
•O r-6r/1r et Sul O01UC 4041 t11101a Met 4 MllfAtte of It1.1L
lu f 10 TNJ fv LlT Fir 016I0 l AD, 104 0017614119 11,616 Aeltt It
tuW.
} 1
I1n: lot9 1010 t019 1 Nt0 if FOCI Vial lr Al
TAI. rt. . D0 11014 VOrt Felt
1 111111 OTA 1,. ui N: lot NI01t1 611[11/b FOOrtlif AS Lot I. *.Kt
'l •4 N ,L,,, H :,L"", 1, fghGtt AMltlum t0 001 CM Or 091104. fit,$.
LY OI 1'11.14 TC 111 11'11.31 411 IOa1v1e, foe 67114•4 60
IAlto' *11 41011 Nr Slr1.
MDNar he. t, l'~" i
V%"3^330 V,t! J Als••n M,OA
wx 45,11A 4% A12M
BL,WK ONE +i`Q 11111 11111 It
,•uf1 621 0110.11 le
"lOT I .,,.It 41. 101 LYpa11.nI rDitlf FLUlt 14 AND he 1610 AMir1
\ ~ 1 AA: LI L,. 0 ixll IA" p14OVA A L LI AN it 11.1 fJ
f Nt r/ At Ir, 0111 ~A 109 0I oAl It Iullclnl• 111 M1 •o H:, Oc
90111 Alm ~ nur.v l? .Iw ,auyuo~.l to NI 1141 xl aulnN Ill SNI na
r.. nrr1.aL u- Inl,e•r1 ul: vl luelr Lnuul. A4L r,x
I IrNr 1!r TAr4nr.
I IIIN !All, Yr ,A 1D lNL 41.LL or 01!Ir ?All 816- Cr
a
4:141} 11.11 i :1 111, tvl TM h.A 7 r1'1I1 'Ile tare VDM NMtn•y ApYUIn zmwA7tM AtI II I 1A r,IrIRAlt
y 1 RY'• TN I! 414 1r rYla IS ell rrl
I 11 IIAr, A.n i, •A1.1 rr, It",LATIr41 f1^11111a01L /cllU>, rr
\ 4tlerl 199 :Ir'.'-Al 1011111.1 the $LAI tION At AMA'. All ',•1
~~DN Petit, 711 n,A so :.Y fIIIr,.11fil, 06262. Title YI 1446=xa
1 1 I9,nIs 1.0 !A AVCVIDAI I WA Ire rr/tlLUlt LF fit 41 N
, Y LI••M.
of t ft I for Stu PAM .Alt LaS.. 4 _ J mg-tp
to t RW
01101117 611 ~ ~ 1 w""'---' 1+ezr
1'7x90• 0Ny,M~~~ sirftk
Sig/1"t QX MATES IN 11E
tdW Age" M f G CW V OF OEWC+k,TEKAS
nlod~ ItatsortUCjVlttf
I`4PAMN 1RY PLAY
.....1--_......y )r~, Re.rl,r HAMMETI & NASK INC. ION
,
~a`11 ~K W~ ;4 Fir W►.RXV4 LNOINUM . L StIRVEW" ANA tM w t.~ Ctr M. 1
qtt Rtv16IDRt tf 1•h11py DINNk, tElA1 Ma ►Ot 6+71 DOW
,N
1 L 1.~,
Y +.,y~ } r l'i' e. Y. I1 rx i e, LL r {r~* { f rt
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: April 161 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Naughton Place Addition,
Lot 1, Block 1
SUMMARY: This tract is 0.30 acres located east of Bernard
street between Hickory and Mulberry Streets.
This tract is more fully described as Lot 1,
Bl(jck 1 and shown in the MEP & RRR Co. Survey,
Abstract 925, Denton, Texas. The property is
zoned multi-family, and a multi-family
development is anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Denial of the plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
l.E rA tt l rs A. u~ ~ L
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
1110g/6
.u
ui.
Miff" -qAI%
/III w Nr ~ r-
y~µ. rr+
4..
wr w t1
tr ~'r 1 I ~ ~ 11`Y lv.l ~ 4 i1
yy 111 r'~St7 i
n
wYM /µfI M
AM A,
are uwu
PRELIMINARY PLAY•
1 ti.> wit IIw1•
* y i LOT 1 BLOCK 1.
NAUOVYON'PLCB ~1DDITlON
+ • y+ .i ~ 4:p , ! + ryY CITY AN OOUNTT O 0901 ON, Te1A0 t
.
01µI OWN901 1191[01 NAUGHTON
2421 f026NOif '
tVYr Pb O1NrON 1< TUAI f1lH
DINTO 17i1Nl42
9NOIN21Nt 9UNK1 BNOIN911UNO
409 6'CANAM $Vft. 91411 109
1 +h ~ r ~~P,k v4 ~ qt ~ ~ l:MjwN+.MI'II~
IBCSIVE,p
~ ~ 1, S ~ .~I ~ •`514 ~~1 ~f~fYi~h~
x „ _ ~ h w. NYC y~ _y T • i 1r~•N ~ i f
f ,r.~i v 1 p, `c ~ f • Y~',~'-. ' r 9J~:'}~'f/I''l f . , A... Iy ~ Y
r` 1.
r.t
4c'. s•;-4
r•: N.114w L.1.: ....I r,...~+r♦1 +n J•~.+~'Q,j~ y~y
• .r~>L :
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: April 161 1985
SUB3Ecr: Preliminary Replat of the Redman Addition,
Lot lb, Block 2
SUMMARY: This tract is 2.710 acres located north of
Dallas Drive and east of Willow Springs Drive.
This tract is more fully described 93 Lot 1R,
Block 12 and shown in the S. C. Hirams Survey,
Abstract 616, Denton, Texas. The property is
zoned light industrial and general retail, and
a retail or office development is anticipated.
Coity services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The reason for the replat is to create one lot
by combining several lots.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the replat
RECOMMi: t'liATI0N: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary replat subject to
the following conditions:
1. A 1011 water line shall be extended from
aillow Springs along Dallas Drive approxi-
mate) 540 feet to lot 2, block 1.
2. Two f re hydrants shall be placed on Dallas
Drive, location to be determined by F
Marshall during final platting stage.
ALTERNATIYh- Denial of the replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
ec a arson
Urban Planner
1110y/9
e.TI'' ` Lr4n1 ,NDWTI11Al i0N! • wo
sio
K •
"o" •u•nw CO~
uaT alv~nwK. rol~t
•3` s ~
04
01
VC •L PCTl 7
~ I T iM011J ,
RLDWA 1 LDS OR. / C. 371 •
LOT IR b OCK 1 e
2,T10 AC • r•,
't. I 1
v. w u
~ Wl. f7• 00 ! P.J.
n
Womb net UK ; y,~•~~,p~' 3x 3
• Ctt/Ril
AtKAT
Lt ~rNwotO°iwTa 04
vr0.0. 0.o tOK tr M" AOi MON
60 La 10 Kw I
t
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: April 16, 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Cedar Creek Addition,
Lots 1-16, Block 1
SUMMARY; This tract is 27. 32 acres located east of
Finpher Road and south of the intersection of
Fincher Road and FM 1830. This tract is mote
fully described as Lots 1-16, Block 1 and shown
in the J. Matthews Survey, Abstract 1645,
Denton, Tex,ae, The property is located in the
extraterritorial jurisdiction and an estate
residential development is anticipated.
This property is located in the extraterritorial
Surtudiction of the City of Denton, therefore,
City se:.viaes and facilities are not available.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the plat
RECOMMI:NDATIONt The Development Review :ommittee recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Denial of the plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
Coolie Carson
Urban Planner
C
111oq/l
1
` ANA, Jt MIeFJ rR u 11. ".XaX M t+\ xa?W I ,
LI LLI (N A V}1rlYt YI rl ALa Mt 1
\F` r • M1r AY ILIN~ ••'O01C Toll l 61141 ]r 1 I t,
\ Y. 1 X IIf P .'uI IL IIIM: X. •YO 1 Il ,YJI
• IL1 W 1Y •N YM VI 1 1.11, LL ° '
fl I. qLL "1 V'• l'r OLIIM_ "Nov. ruj As, A:-
AN", M'•} t ~I'' "IN raII1 N4 J f.M1LS.
rr~11 of N two Ill at Not we" L101 ".'rd is 111 111 M. L
f V ) F a• 11 I1 e.l W IPA rJf y0YMl1 tale "1 '.•ML . F1I
1 t 111t' ur 'IN, OL ¢lbrtNl Ot Plrtlll is 3(11111N vat tXI •.I
1f1~1lA TI Hall
Y r I•. q1 IIFYJ P1P Ic MLt 1 Lb11•ll LN r1"O fk.l r^ .X
w:Fr.F. Ln II 1
S la. "Ih Y1.41 LMriI N MI11Lr t:
C S~ ♦ At
1. W A
ftiT: l+tt r , : 1. „1111 n a'~+ur II "'At 11r-•ax .l•, I .a,t,a^1 1+ ~
' Ct11iLnLlt D 2 It Ir a u.A nl at a• wW
i fll T t
tN, yl[p L HtlE {IaLt it l1ti Fit % ~ I. 11 rl.,Nru 11 M'/1'tfl d total a to ►.711
f No F.MIY rIII of SPIN nafl A 11 ir1rtl PAN tV 1.11.1. Illt tr V .1 x•
CuP •2';n l IS 14 1lh'. ul f t k I a 11F d1 let$.10 air Ml W401
f i•! ihlaf0. ! Po. No YIi, Ia nlnl It 11XU aw11M nlLilY"e x.11.1 d:1
' t NI 10 fie!
- }f• •y~ r
..D4: ~:I? E o 11ao fO 4111
1 !;}j )yr. to JAL) 90. 1 ON 110 1 1 01 tlletX WN:1t111. "I
M't1{ NLk1.." YLf.•1•+.Rr Y
Q i 1 / t N Illl N "1 :MXI tll.
J,S I 7 hi I( Y. .Lt ll It LI NINaS M OW,Y \t!r r +:a11
IOTt tl'' }lt At } e ~x 1,0112 Z :.x `It I,JIM\ru, R 1
w• . 1
LY({
' Lot' 15 r ~i LOT Id FS Q LOT >D .,1 1. Ia:11ft IN Itt"I CAN
S [Ir 11.0.1 J LYI LIJINx
+ p Y1 d =$*/I 1'1• (a As I" 111,
f Q S{. l01 16
dl ; 1 fawnt a♦ I. 1 h 14MA d /.SO4flL Q q L/Mf.• KA1 on AN In r+a tY n..u1 anlRau m.v !~Jr. r11!o.!
L 7~.•'i+ R^ IA .rl t tr rL ; u II.YI r.l AN to 1 rill
• T L K"• A'1 111'7 NO v O t+lM 14 NOIb F.!0.1at "I 11,016. 1141 Y ft1'X.aJ
1.
11 tl' 'S •L \ T 1: .1 II11 tV M lr 111$ IN IM AN i•.t.n 1:! s . •
4•' I 1 ♦ R IPf•~• ~x L. r ,111 A, 1, Its,,
• Ir f.•T "..1 131 ii 1' u• ( ♦ I • yl .a;
Y `,lilt \ 1r' 1 • N ~ .
L el 1 of bNO.I, It I5 Xl1V'N 1 X!lot
Il N 19 •
t) '-"y ~r .I. w r11 M IN 1l 1 NIP Lt Al aY.Lt.
I AN ~O I;. 'r LSD ~ YH to • ,t 11 L 1
.t \ae ~Y Sit' O O V a b l PjAllr a «
',f IrIT l 1'•' YLM 1 IF N ~C I N n y .1'A N IwOp IE L I't IIL'A rr ..IlJill t1 Itot J :L
lu .l 01% XI L. 1. tL, ,
i:`8 O ) "r'L't •N • " IS d r. ~a rtlt u w
in 1 a
Z = / Y.
l.j• :1.1i. e~ r L bNS e. S! IIt NY P Y _ J b 11 au. It .:L Sr .r. 1.....
I't
A Palo.
No -24
L Y 1 1'11.0
'rt'11b•111~6II~ i-- 1.11 1r. l!!t t •~..rl r~s i ,.11~I f IF
.•..~YI .4 Tr J• °1 m
1 yl' w ~ 1'/✓E i at <..I Told rn a m\e NI f
= I All.
CE D.d 41e0d~ MV E Fk + II • , 111, 4.11aY .'•J F' x'lI111, PL Ne. ..I, 1.1 •
H to II a'xIh • r.
of. -To, I ~w Vl •Y / f r a NINA
1 11 r-~--j•pfS 'rr
(ti 1 t • a . {t CAN i✓1. 1 11 fll Yf 1 l•aLI of, 1Y1rF iM1 F'tl
t . LI ' 1'.'•~1~."~~ i ~l-I li. < LIM13pv1 A.l. Y1, AAA lOt 4 w ^ \rr~ :.lar. 1T 4 rt LO1 9 1. j wJ ,e f. YII
N•I . I:ti:w
~1C 1w1X . I LOT Q .rrl rr1
1 1 1fN.. X••11 r~i ^ /.(/faM. 111 N
nO ~r 1 11111 Told to OMAN, I1 ~I,H T • VC .11• J CaT l h 1 J = 'YI Pr post l1 111
~1 • r• E~ • . \ •
1 ~r LO1r1G`~. t. . 2j FY, .r Ixl IiXEIMAInu FIJIAN nMI 1 M11 •1 11.1r .I,
11 IP am al.'
r r •r1'r . Pn. Oar rt141U:1r Ullaaa 1
.
y 1 P r1~~ 11 frY .Wtr i•` ~.)r~ Y . I1!q full I1L rllYat 1P1LY/ .rLr YI M 1"
f nrr:olr, Irei.L Le rtw. a,. a `,o ■ ut I.••
1 t ~'~N!!=1t ail >'31 -t i' ' ` / L P. it t 4 { CO1 10 Lr• 1
,
1 • ( k a • 1,1' tot LMf PA for • N f1 t lT. ,tl. Imo. i~.111
ly l~ ' f • YI { 8 /JbU. Q n11.u .a 11 M CONN. rnlnr n.nt1
LOT S
.
♦ 1"l L•'ll FIND l11
'a 44 6-7 /IlfJ is. u •Iq•L off i/~ • .1.a 1 lmml❑1 al No
Itt{I j E w
3
. • , Jw r . 11. N
A at S t X t NO A AN
s- ~I 1111., 11M•11or1Twd;:4' Y'° t 1._ S -'A VIVO;; i'dG -Iie1a'•';i:>fi
2 • „ { rw
aA J ~~Ai a' • a f It • S. lll•I! ll'rl 2Vtu.
/i~L.~1 „y f011•!A .1rta t Lnrlnrtn
1 S. 6l' >f f0'rl. tit" l111 A. 10111 Mf kll l
JA4{S r, MIC111t, r 'EE pN, 11 IL,1 1, /A(11", 11J.W"Itt AN r' .
•r
• 1 b GRtifIN fEC t t •aNrt n.nn tar fru•.ur.lrnn- .Hr. .X NO
if Jon taYlt CI It Law, bO 1M M1 : • O1
t rlJta lnu/1 At rrln•u, alnral I « •Il r. a,-r1 alt^, ••11
.11JM'If of P1\ (won Of 4414t.
rr 'wiu~~ ~iifr~ Oll'klal JAKE 011ASMAN
l ti Lot 1011111 • a •ci fii'7
F 11a' AMTIt
ailIkC71AfIGk Ttlr kotf TX. 1u o ~'1i 01H Fit
4flue Ai to p pE~}►11 PiifIIMINARY RAT
d f i1Ji 1
irr t1r■ 1p1A1 [L1tf~ 0~~' CEO .nEEK ADDITIOIf
` Not Plteo' Y7~ my T .wS", t wi,,,rIF) wetitr Als, IAA.1 '445 c111 111 CONSVLTINO D*NttftS to SUMErOAS
jDEAI. J I plot
1.11.1! 111wr ►n. d•1 itwoNl C6wfr. 'b,Al 1 M ttW
II r 1:I,,,w: r. tr DLNTON. - - -
1010 0/f S
t[ d yt .v r 3 eY ~,n ry Y r .r
April 16, 1985'
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
T0: MAYUR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Change Order lrl. for Water 4 Sewer Line Relocation
-Loop 288 alvert Paving Company Bid 19364.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilitie., Foard, at their meeting of March 27, 198S,
recommended to the City Council approval of change order number
I to Calvert Paving Company for water line and sewer line
relocation project, Loop 288, in the amount of -$2,549,00.
SUMMARY
An unseen Delhi Gas Company pipeline at a different depth than
reported has required relocating a City of Denton sewer line in
order to accommodate the new construction of Loop 288. Also,
the elimination of a requirement for a water line coming along
Mingo Road under Loop 288 is appropriate. This particular
crossing will be served instead by a casing under Loop 288 at
highway 380.
BACKGROUND
These two CIP projects are for relocating water and sewer line
and placement of empty casing pipes to accommodate the new Loop
288 construction by the Texas Dopartment of Highways, When
this project was being designed by the City Engineering
Department, the Delhi Gas Company engineer was contacted to
determine the depth of their gas line so that the relocation of
an existing City of Denton sewer line could be positioned to
miss the gas line. Upon construction of this sewer line by
Calvert Paving Corporation, the Delhi gas line was not where
reported, but in a direct path of the sever line. Delhi would
not move the gas line and, in order for the contractor not to
be held up, the sewer line was resloped to miss the gas line
and work was resumed,
The water line casing to be placed at Mingo Road for a future
crossover point, is not needed as per Hogan and Rasor Water
Distribution Study. Another casing at Highway 380 and new Loop
288 will accomplish the same purpose without, the added expense.
PROGRAMS,_DEPARTMENTS, GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Municipal Utilities, City Agencies, Contractors, Texas
Department of Highways,
3602U:S
'Nt'6 M1S 3 i'rt' f tr. yv
4 J .
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of this change order is as follows (see Exhibit I and
11) 16
(a) Original water line relocation contract amt. $979397.S0
CO 01-Delete 237' of 18" casing 8 $26.50/ft -6 281.00
New Water Line Relocation Contract Amt.
$~II3: 3Zf
Source of funds: 623-008-0461-9114-7943
Bond Funds
(b) Origginal sewer line relocation contract amt. $17,100.60
C011, add 100' replacement 8" sewerline $ 3 232 00
New Sewer Line Relocation Contract Amt.
Source of funds: 674-008-0471-9114-9952
NET DECREASE IN CONTRACTS -$2,549.00
Prepared by: Respectfully su fitted,
C. David Ham Alp •
Asst. Director of Utilities tang-
Wtr/WW Divisions City Manager
Ap rovedd,,, /0
Director of Utilities
EXHIBITS: I Memo- City Engineer
II CO 1I- Calvert Paving Corp.
III Minutes PUB Meeting of 3/27/85
}
36020:6
t
MAR 1 4
19Es
lrYo(DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 366.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 13, 1985
TO: David Ham, Assistant Director of Water and Sewer
Utilities
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
RE: Ctlange Order/Savings Loop 288 Utility Relocations
1. Cost Savings - Deleting Mingo Road
Casing:
237' of 28" casing @26.50 $69281.00
PLUS
2. Cost. Increase - Delhi Gas Line -
Highway 380 at Loop 288 - Northside
100' Remove and Replace 8" Sewer - $3,732.00
MINUS
BID FROM CALVERT IS ENCLOSED
TOTAL COST DECREASE WILL BE ; :~Z$49` 00
.
Jer} ~C P.E.
City~Enlin'eer
1s
. p01t31F
ExN~B~T t
a - rr t x +°A
t L b4 11 y iYW SAY.. 1M1 n.,S ! t y^r y {I ` i Jyl;
Calvertr Paving `ors.
H10ory Creek Rd.-P.O. Box 268
Denton, Texas 78201
Telephone 8171387831
Jerry Clark P.E.
City of Denton
315 McKinney
Denson, Texas 76201
February 27,1985
Dear. Sirl
Pleas, find enclosed our proposed price to you for the placing
and removal of 100' of 8" ductile iron sewer main at the Inter-
section of state's highway #380 and Loop 288,'in the amount of
$3232.00.
Also enclosed is our amount of 500.00 for the difference in a
4' standard manhole and a 4" drop manhole.
These prices are based on our contract to you dates approximate-
ly December 20, 1984. Making our total price to you $3732.00
If we may be of any further assistance to you please feel free
to contact me at 382-6688.
incerely your ,
`r L ~~7
t4V~V H
Calver Paving
c.c. David Ham
r
14 4 7 1,147
PUB Minutes
Marc. 170 198'
12. CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER #1 FOR WATER AND SEVER LINE RELOUTION
LOOP r8_8 CALVERT PAYING COMPANY BID #9364. Ham reviewed the
proposal. oomes made a motion to recommend to the Ctty
Council approval of the proposal. Second by Boyd. Motion
carried.
The Board adjourned into Executive Session at 11:15 !.M. The
Board reconvened at approximately 11:40 PM.
Meeting adjourned at 11:42 PM.
e
•
r
.'j
DATE: 04/16/85
CITY COUNCIL R8PORT FORMAT Igo 46
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Z-1729
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1729 at
its meeting of March 27, 1985 by a vote of 6 to 0.
SUMMARY:
.his is a request by Charles :latkins for a change of zoning from the
agricultural (A) to the light industrial (LI) classification. The
property is located at the northwest corner of US Hwy 380 and Cooper
Creek Road and is located on the edge of a low intensity area.
BACKGROUNDI
An industrial development is located at this site and is considered
a legal non-conforming use. The owners are interested in expanding
their building. According to the zoning ordinance, a legal non-
conforming use may not be expanded; therefore, the owners are
regvesting a change of zoning. Considering the size of this tract,
tht, intensity of the area will not be affected.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable
Respectfully submit
Har
0. Chc s tung
City Manager
Prepared by:
CC c,; U co fir.
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Ap ov
Jeff M
Direct6t of Planning
and Community Development
0788]
y
T''.'~ e y'e c
y+ p WI' .R r' Jra a r a n' 1 F w n 1 c f fia
" R ~ h x c r
.
' s
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:!
RECON49NDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1724 Meeting Date: April 16, 1985
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Charles Watkins
1123 Fort Worth Drive
Denton, TX 76205
Status of Applicant: Enginiter
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) to th,. light
industrial (LI) classification
Location and Size: This is a .462 acre tract located at
the northwest corner of OS Hwy 380
and Cooper Creek Road.
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Vacant, agricultural; A
South - Commercial
East - Commercial
West - General Retail
Denton Development Guide: The property is on the fringe of a
low intensity area and along the
limits of the study area of the
{ Development Guide.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: A culvert with 120 cfs. goes under
US Hwy 380, and drainage enters the
tract from the northeast corner at 30
cfs. 700' west of Cooper Creak.
Transportation: Cooper Creek Road is a secondary
major arterial with an 80' right-
of-way and requires perimeter paving.
Hwy 380 will be widened to the north
according to preliminary plans (see
District 18). The widening of Hwy
360 would likely require 50, more
right-of-way. Sidewalks along both
roads will be edquired
r y":` n° sb!, .y v;.ir t ti n yrT 3 w a. S K~, r• ! P f
(Case Z-1729)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Utilities: Adequate services are available. A
lo" water line and a 10" sanitary
sewer line are located along the
north rbjht-of-way of ft-j 380, east
across the frontage of this property.
ANALYSIS
This site is located outside the defined Development Guide study
area,, however, sites outside the study area are generally con-
sidered to have a tow intensity designation. A low intensity
area is located south of this site. Considering the size of
this tract, the intensity of the area will not be affected.
A mixture of land uses including industrial, retail, commercial,
and residential exists in this vicinity. An industrial devel-
opment is located at this site and is considered a legal
non-conforming use. According to the zoning ordinance, a legal
non-conforming use may not be expanded; therefore, the owners
are requesting light industrial zoning so that the existing
development may ba expanded.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission rerear.ended approval of
1 Z-1729 at its meeting of March 27, 1985 by a vote of 6 to 0.
{
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
WrACHKENTS
1. Lorgation map
2. PA:_'perty owner list
3. Reply form total
4. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of March 27, 1985
0739s
1~'•'•R ~ la
ti~ a .a t~ 6 r . n=.. 'i 'I ti Y e s r a w . ,
. ~4 P '`i s r r r ~]a~ . ~ F r. a, + i, o ~ N d
L ~
I♦ '
i x♦ n~lX 1 r` ~.ti.
S'8
4
Gp
I
,PD•18i L I
P C dP0 a6,
Y TO (east)
V
I c .61 -1729
A PD-64 A`
JEJ
` C
PD co
S•5 SF-10
f -
5-126 `
PD-73
i
_ri«yrrr ri 1 'i
' fir.
IPROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY'COUNCIL
2--1729
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Harrison Custom Homes None Received
by Buford Harrison
P. O. Box 671
Carrollton, TX 75006
~ ~ ~ r`~ .,j~xt ~5. a r~~ ~ i a ~~4 ~ ri'~ r 7a, , ~ k Y ~"~~x ~ ° ~ •a,:r
l
1
r
14~ 1
11 f4ta~~7~8r-e.~ ~i
i
• i
A417 1.818
I •
ww~
Irv, 4~'v
~;.iM Y I' f
i
Minutes
Planning and ZoningCommission
• March 27, y
1
The reggular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, March 27 19155, at
5:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr., Gary Juren,
Robert LaFerte and Andy Sidor
Absent: Tom Pearson
Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey,
Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Joe Morris,
Assistant City Attorney; Jerry Clark, City Engineer`
Koorosh Olyai, Transportation Engineer; Ray Rumfiels,
Civil Engineer, and Audrey Bachman, secretary
Vice Chairman R. B. Escue, Jr. called the meeting to order.
1. MINUTES: It was moved by Mr. LaForte, seconded by Me. Cole,
anT unanimously carried (4-0) to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of March 13, 19255.
Mr. Juren arrived at the meeting.
II. CONSENT AGENDA: On question, Ms. Carson advised that the
Development evLew Committee now recommends approval of all
consent agenda items. It was moved by Mr. Juren, seconded
by Mr. LaForte, and unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the
consent agenda as follows:
A. Approval of final 1)la:. of the Coopers Landing Addition,
Section I (formerly :Windsor Park Addition, Section 1).
8. Approval of final plat of the Dallas Hill Addition,
Block 1, Lot 1.
C. Approval of final plat of the Fletcher's State Fair
Corny Dog Addition.
D. AppLcval of `inal plat of The Meadows Addition, Mock 1,
Lot 1.
E. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the Teasley
Center Addition, Block 1, Lot 1.
F. Approval of final plat of the Woodhill Square Addition,
Block 1, Lot 1.
C. Recommend vacation of the Wooded Acres Subdivision,
Second Installment.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
r A. 2-1729. Tnis is the petition of Charles Watkins
requesting a change n zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the light industrial (LI) district on
a .462 acre tract located at the northwest corner of
U.S. Higl,way 380 and Cooper Creek Road. If the zoning
change is approved, the property may be utilized for any
land use permitted in the light industrial (L1) district
by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
Hr.' Claiborne arrived at the meeting and assumed Chair.
PETITIONER: Charles Watt-ins, representing the owner of
f prpert, stated that there is an okisting metal
building, tK& t use Otch has been there for several
yearo is manufacture of 'plaatic laminate sou tertgqpps,
that they now employ 3-5 people and number o eaplbyees
1 Q ( r k r J. r 1 l' 4. S t.. l . S ! 1 ~ r`~ k '4. ~ ,7 \ S r Y P: i
p 4 L Minutes
Mara: 27, 1985
Page 2
will not increase. He continued they are now renting
two facilities for storage of projects and would like to
have no expand by adding onsite storaPa facilities; that
expand n to range
store plans onsite t rather n than resnt a storage f
facilities elsewhere. On question, Mr. Watkins stated
that property does not qualify for a planned development
since it is only 1/2 acre in size; that in discussions
with staff it was determined that light industrial clas-
sification would be required for existing use.
IN FAVOR: None present
OPPOSED: None present
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson said that seven notices were
mailed to property owners; one reply form was received
in favor, no reply forms were received in opposition.
She noted that 10 acres is required for a light indus-
trial planned development, therefore a PD was not a
consideration; that L1 toning is necessary for the
exit ing manufacturing use which is considered a legal
non conforming use. She said that Cooper Creek Road
would require perimeter street pacing, that Highway S80
would be widened to the north with likely So foot right-
of-way. She continued that surrounding area has a wide
mix of usage, that request will not affect low intensity
designation or low intensity aree to the south. She
said that petitioner proposes to expand an existing LI
use and said recommends from the adjacent,coshe
m-
mercially zoned area.
REBUTUL: None
RECOMMENDATION: It was moved by Mr. LaForte, seconded
y r, or, and unanimously carried (6-0) to recommend
approval of Z-1729.
B. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLAT of Schmitt and Ripy's
Addition, oc of R.
STAFF RFPORT: M3. Carsoa stated that this is a tract
of 0.619 acres located eas: of Vine Street and north of
Withers Street; property is zoned MF-I and multi-family
development is anticipated. On question, she said that
building will front on Withers Street requiring a I$ foot
setback. On further question, she said that a 2S foot
setback would not be required on Vine Street as property
is not to be used for single family or two family dwel-
lings. Ms. Carson continued that purpose of replat is
to combine lots 9, 10 and 11 into one lot; that peti-
tioner is changing frontage from Vine to Withers Street
to allow more parking on Vine Street. She said that
Development Review Committee recommends approval of
the replat.
PETITIONER: No representative present
IN FAVOR: None present
OPPOSED: None present
RECOMMENDATION: It was moved by Mr. Sidor, seconded by
r, scup, an3 ananisously carried (~-O) to recommend
Approval of the preliminary and fins. replat of Schmitz
at-.A Ripy's Addition, Block D, Lot 9.A.
Gr ~lY ar-r}• t, yeF 7 -7 'rm m% l 7, 77 -7
r5 .?C'hT~; rt. ♦
~'~'.i,,.
nn. W vaOSBL
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING NAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 0.462 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE
M.E.P. 6 P-R-R. CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1469, DENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS AND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF U. S. HIGHWAY 380 AND
COOPER CREEK ROAD; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL "LI" CLASSIFICATION AND
USE FOR SAID PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described below is hereby changed
from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use to Light
Industrial "LI" District Classification and Use under the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the M.E.P.
S P.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 1469 north of State Highway 24
and west of a public road, being the same tract conveyed by
Quincy Hughes and wife, Toumic Joyce Hughes to Paul Gallo and
Barrett H. Reeves on April 13, 1965, recorded in Volume 521,
Page 686, Deed records, Denton County, Texas, and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a steel pin at the northeast corner of said tract
on the west line of said road;
THENCE south with said line, 132.0 feet to a steel pin on said
Highway 24 right-of-way;
THENCE south 40°20' west with said right-of-way 121.5 feet to
angle;
THNCE south 77°50' west with said right-of-way 38 feet to e
concrete monument;
THENCE north with the west line of said Gallo tract, 210 feet to
a steel pin at its northwest corner;
THENCE north 77°50' east with a fence 120 feet to the place of
beginning and containing in all 0.462 acres of land.
SECTION 11.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No.
69.1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in
District Classification and Use.
SECTION III.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
Z-1729/PACE 1
l '
.
City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration among
other things for the character of the district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Dunton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION IV.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD 0. , FOO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS /
1
BY:
2-1729/PAGE 2
J
MI
.0 r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIAS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHERBAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials,
e uipment supplies or services in accordance with she procedures
of state law and City ordinances; and
reviewed and rethe City commended Mthnat the herein designated
described bids ouploy*2 has
the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Baadgst for
the appropriation of funds to be used fcr the purchase of the
materials, equipments supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; anal
WHEREAS. Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
;3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every
act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THERX.s'ORE, THE COUNCIL OF 117HE CITY OF DENTPON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That thr numbered itras in the following number.; hide for
materials a tent, sup, lies, or services, shown in the "Bid
Proposale?, at. .,ad hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as
being the lowest raapoasibla bids for such items:
BID 14 MSER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
:.-9324.~ -Stokes Div. Pennwalt Corp.
4~5b6.0D
9367 _ A I _Aeve Krause Dodos ,1;
9366 , 2 _ _HiHey Machloerv = 4.345.00
9424 All Neptune Water Meter
r
94?1 All jttmsatic, Inc. ; 51 _
9433 -Allpa icipatton - Ridaewsv Plm 398, 00
9436 1_ Conley. Lott Nichols. Inc. $-.121211,00
.,_,944 JA1],_,,,. Ysuthn I Assostates of Dallas 3,0„_68., 00,E
PAW I
v✓.a n •e'.; r, r ti':a ~ e: w ,ry z.,. w + 'v.,; : N G
.
SECTION 11
That b the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of & submitted bids, the City accepts thu offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase
the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with
the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the
specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Hid Proposals,
and related documents.
SECTION I_II.
That should the City and persons submitting approved and
accepted ite s and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
formal written agrosment as a result of the acceptanco, appproval,
and awarding of the bids,. the City Manager os his designated
representative is hereby authorised to execute thi written eo_krict
which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract
is in accordance with the terry, coaditicnnis specifications,
standards, ,.quantities and specified suns co.cakc• to khe Did
Proposal and related bid d04U4 eats heroic approved mad accepted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bid the City Council hereby authorises the
expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with
the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made purattant
thereto as authorised herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this is _ day of April , 1985.
RICHARD o, 5TMW' MANOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,,TExAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
DEBRA ADAMI ORAYOVITCR I CITY ATTMKY
CITY OF DENTOM, TEW
By l
I 131 I k,
DATE: April 16, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19324 VACUUM PUMP
RECOMENDATIOfI; We recommend the bid award to North Texas Industrial Supply
on September 4, 1984, be withdrawn; and this bid be re-awarded
to the next lowest bidder, Stokes Div. Pennwalt Corp., in
the amount of $4,566.00.
SCARY: The pump offered by North Texas Industrial Supply aileturned
meet the requirements of the bid. The pump has been for full credit. Stokes/Pennwalt has agreed to honor their
original bid, and they do meet all specification requirements.
8ACK6ROU11D: Tabulation Sheet
PROGPA Gs DEP_ARTPEKTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Metering and Sub Stations
FISCAL IMiPPXT: Funds for this purchase have been encumbered against the
1983-84 budget in the amount of $3,807.00. The balance
will come from the 1984-85 budget account #610-008-0953-9217.
Respectfully submitted:
G. hr s artung
City Manager
Prepared
Name: s Tom 0. haw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
1
Approved:
ha , C. .M.
rs
• 0on
tle: Purchasing e;yent
BID f 9324
BID TITLE VACUUM PUMP STOKES NORTH
DIV. TEXAS
OPENED August 21, 19b4_ 2 p,m. PENNWALT INDUSTRIAL,
CORP. SUPPLY
ACCOUNT 1_ 610-008-0253-9217 _ CO.
15-ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDO VENDOR ENDORNDOR VENDOR VENDOR
I Vacuum Pump 4566.00 3807.00 r~
Mfg Pennwalt Ingersoll = ' a
Model 148-H Y255X5
FOB Point Philadelphia Denton
PA TX
b
711
eATEi April 16, 1965
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
70 Mayor and Members of the City Council
I
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9367 PICKUPS AND VANS
REC0MMf11DAT101(: we recommend this addition to the bid be awarded to Dave
Krause Dodge for:
A. 3 Units of Item 2 @ $7,989.01 each = .;123,961.03
B. 1 Unit of Itens 6 @ $8,814.15 each = $ 8,814.15
Total $32,781.18
SUMMARY: This award is for the addition of four new vehicles.
Three are for the Engineering/Inspection/Survey
Department and one for the Machine Shop. The Street Bond
program and a reorgapization of the Machine Shop fleet has
created the neid for these vehicles.
EMCKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PRO_GM9 DEPARTMENTS OR GRIUPS AFFECTED:
Machine Shop
Engineering
FISCAL IMPACT: Motor Pool
Funds for three vehicles will be from 1984-85 Budget Funds.
The Machine Shop unit will be acquired as a Motor Pool
replacement.
Respectfully submitted:
a ~ z4t;o -
r s Hartung
City Manager
Pre red by:
Rime: lont D. aw, C.P.R.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
ah J. Marshall, C.P. .
le: Purchasing Agent
BID i 9361
BID TITLE PICK-UPS AND VANS
OPENED 12-11-84 2 p.m. DAVE MCNATT BILL
KRAUSE CHEVROLET UTTER
ACCOUNT i DODGE FORD
i TY.r ITEM D 0 VENDOR -VENDOR---- EN _R ENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
-virkijp,-k Ton cua A 8-097 45 53
2 3 Pickuo- N .24 8. 288 00
3 4 Pi,.ku) 3/4 Ton LN8 V8 8 199.15 9,269.38 9,526.00
14 1 Picker 3/4 on LWB V8 4WD 99599.85 10,051.51 10 815.00
15 3 Cab-Chassis 3/4 n LWB 8 --40,278.30 9,314.76 9,323.00
16 1 Cab-Chassis 1 Ton 81814.15 10,020.2 859.00
7 1 Cab-Chassis 1 Ton Tow Pk q. _ NB 10,216.12 10,031.00
Van 15 Passenger 14,769.95 NB 3,996.00
Deliver 60-50 Days 60 Days 45-90 Oa s
1 dl? r . !~.Ms t ! nr ice- Diu r4Pq 1 v:_
:,cR 9
t1 JI P
DATE: April lb, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19386 VIBRATORY kOLLER
REi;OMMENDATION: We recommend the award for Item 2 on January 9, 1985, to
Cooper Machinery be withdrawn; and this item be awarded to
the next lowest bidder, HiWay Machinery, in the amount of
$9,345.00.
SUMMARY: Cooper Machinery was awarded this bid b,sed on price and
delivery. Their delivery schedule has been exceeded (3/1/85).
Their new date is July 1, 1985. The Street Department needs
a roller as soon as possible. HiNay Machinery will honor
their bid of 1/8/85 and has a unit in stock.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGWu!S, DEPARTWITS OR 120UPS AFFECTED:
Street Department
Motor Pool
FISCAL IMPACT: This unit is being funded thru a lease/purchase agreemtn
and 1984-85 Midget funds.
Respectfully submitt d:
1 4 104
G. Chris Hartiong
City Manager
Pre ared by:
7z QAL-.r
Name: ofi Shaw, C.P.M.
Title. Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
a . Marshall,
tIe: Purchasing Agent
03A6
AID TITLE VIBRATORY Rni ER
FERGUSON COQPER =PER
HI-WAY PLAINS
WKWED January 8. 1985 2 R-0, 14F6. CO. MACHINERY CHINERY MACHINERY
INC. CORP. ORP. CO.
ccOUNT 0 100-002-0031-6508
ITCH DESCRIPTION to" g4pok VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 i `Roller Spec 2830 241900.00 14988.00 49168.40 N/6 210207.00 -
1 Roller Spec 2872 80100.00 6,570.00 9,189.80 91345.00 NIB
FOB Denton Denton Enton Denton Denton
Delivery 01 10 Days 45 Days 15 Days 20-45 Days
1 Da
02 30-45 Days 46 D s Lo-36
Mike #1 FqrsusQn YJ n 0 o B
oMa
Make 02 Ferguson Mauldin a 1-36
J
I "v •~3 . r. F ,w 1i t~ .1 . e r•~~ .~7^ a N « tr ♦r ~ u ( R+ r.
~ r.
DA7E:'Apri1 161 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G.,Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9424 8" WATER METER
RECL"EIIDATIOW We recommend this bid be awarded to Neptune Water Meter Co.
In the amount of $5,500.00 oath for one meter at this time
and for future requi1°,aments through 10/1/85.
SUMMARY: This bid was approved for one unit 3/20/85. We are now
purchasing a second unit for immediate delivery and requesting
permission to make this bid a 6 month award.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMEKTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Water A Sewer Department
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds Account Number 620-008-0461-9117
Respectfully submittea:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Pre ared by:
ame: Tom U. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing AGent
Approved:
J. Marshall, C:P.M.
tle: Purchasing Agent
4tD TITLE _gM YATFg Ig TFR ROCKWELL ERSEY IMUNICIPAL HERSEY DEER NEPTUNE pcRNARO
OPENED INT'L RODUCTS INTER CO. PRODUCTS TER CO. ETER SSOCIATES
March 7. 1985 2 n 0. CO.
ACCOUNT
ITEM QF_,
EN R VENDOR VENN ---VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 1 On Compound Meter 6045,62 920.00 0 6643.03 » 6920,00 NB 550.00 68i5.00
1
--Delivery 5 Da s 5 Days-.- 20 Da s 45 Days 5 0a s 15 ml
Fob Denton Denton Denton Denton enton nton
y r•~ : r 3 1 w . ~ 4 4_ , I 1F u}'?, ~~~7 i . ,,.1 . H , a~ DATE: April 1611 .785
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
f
SUBJECT: BID #9427 HAND HELD ELECTRONIC METER READING
RECOMMENDATION: We recomnr:nd this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Datamatic,
Inc., for the total amount of $5',400.00. This ino-ludes some
hardware that we may purchase from another vendor that is more
compatible and dependable, but will not cost more than the
amount approved in this bid.
SUMMARY: This project is to speed up and more accurately record the
usage of all water and electricity in the City. This will
be coupled with our main line computer is directly input
the information for record and billing purpose 5.
BACKGROINID: Tabulation Sheet
Momo from John McGrane
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
This is to record the readings directly to the computer through
the software program which would speed the process with more
FISCAL IMPACT: accuracy.
Budget Funds
Respectfully submitted:
Chris artung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Marshall, C.P.M.
e: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
n J. Marshall, C, P.M.
le. Purchasing Agent
`10 ! 9421
tD TITLE NAND HELD ELECTRONIC METE RADIX LIN T. DATA111ATIC ITRON NTELLICORP
REAUM CORP. DELONEY NC.
PENED March 19. 1985 2 CO.
CCOUNT
OYY. ITEM D6SCRIPTi N VE DO ENDQR 1IDOR V NDOR VENDOR VENDOR
--Y Y1
1 !deter Rewdina System 69j175.Oe 61 200,00 57,400.00 8900:0.00 57 465.00
Fab Denton, TX Denton Denton Denton
Delivery 90 Days 60-90'Days 120 Da s- 90 Davs
I
L
i
I
i
0
CffYol DffW0N, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ! TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
a ■ ■ a a ■ a a ■ a
DATE: April 10, 1985
TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FROM: John F. McGrane, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: HAND HELD METER READING DEVICES
After consultation with Gary Collins, Charles Cryan John
Coppage and Ray Wells, it was decided to award the bid for the
hand held meter reading devices to Datamatic, Inc.
They were the low bid and had experience with TRES Customer
Service Systems which is currently the system utilized by the
City of Denton. In addition, they are a local firm which should
allow for faster maititenan;.e and repair response time. Also,
Datamatic has installed it,s system at several local sites and in
total has approximately 2,'100 hand held devices in use.
If you have further questions, please adivse.
John c ran
JFM cG : ab
.Vi6' S rp :o'I A 5 ,~a[ iyyj:'. ri °q. d. .s .gad,, . r d v ;"b A: a i,:'
UATII April 16o 1985
CITY COUNCIL R111'OlUr I=omAT
'r0: Heyor and Hembers of the City Coui:ell
PROM: 0. Chris Hartung, City Haider
Subj BC'r: BID 19433- PARKWAY PLAZA-WATER PARTICIPATION
R ECOHM Etl DAT I Oil I We recommend this bid be awarded on the low difference for
water ove'rsizing of $32,398.00. This is a bid participation
with Pat Donivan - Ridgeway Plaza, Joint Venture, as
presented by Weir and Associates, Inc., Engineers.
SUMM AR Y: This bid was received and opened as per policy at 2 p.m. on
March 21, 1985. We received four bids, with D/FW Utilitie3
submitting the best low bid difference between fhe oversized
waterline and the required waterline as per attached.
BACKGROU11U: Tabulation Sheet '
F
1'IlOC1 M1S.t I)HI'A1t'iM11117'S Olt UKOUPS AFFECT U:
This will be a. part of the utilities, Water/Sewer, oversizing
as recommended for the expected growth in the area of Lillian
Miller Parkway and I-35.
H SCAL 1MrACT: There is no fiscal impact on the General Budget.
Respectfully ub ltted:
Aa
uOir~
p t;l iElI N
City 1•la:tager
P 4win. Mars hall , C.P.M.
ltle Puhasing Agent
A Yedl
i' -C
~ 04f
n
rsha , C.P.M.
~t1* y rchasing Agent
Ili0 9433 (Participation Bid)
(ID TITLE PARitay P1 A7A - wATFR
UTILITY DF/W CALVERT JAY MAR
IPENED MArch 21.1985 2 p.m. CONTRACTORS UTILITY PAVING CO. CONST.
INC.
1CCOUNT /
OTY, ITEH DESCEIPTION VENDOR --VENDOR ME"OR W DOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
Part A - YAter Total 94,194.06 100 105.44 86 440.00 -B.209, 00 Part A - Alternate 31 866.00 619795.00 2e,301.00 20 072.00
I DifferenCe Participation _23.333, 00 32 398.00 75 804.44 66o468.00
~ i H l r `Y". tM :t1Yt t, Y ^hn .4`A y~ 'a I 1a7 ♦ i ( ~
DATE: April 169 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
70: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9436 CHIP SPREADER b ASPHALT PAYER
RECOIKE*IITION: We recommeno this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specifications for item One, Conley Lott Hichols,
in the amount of $52,211.00, Fob Denton with delivery in
45 days.' We also recommend Item Two not be awarded at this
time.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Street Department
Motor Pool
FISCAL IMPACT: This item will be funded thru a third party lease/purchase
paid from 1984.85 budget funds.
Respectfully submitted:
U.-URs Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
06- qc~
ame: Tom 'D Saw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
o n J. Marshall, C,P.M.
Ale Purchasing Agent
410 ,~9436 _
ID TITLE CHIP SPREADER A ASPHALT PAVE
CONLEY COOPER HIWAY DOPER
FENED (larch 21. 1985 2 LOTT IIACHINERY W HINERY MACHINERY
NICHOLS
COUNT 1 '
OTY. N V --VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
r
1 1 Chip Spreader 52,211.00 NB 53,495.00 NB
1 Asphalt Paver NB 339619.12 ?.0,502.00 .9,621.00
with Trailer 37,069.12 34,002.25 3,271.00 i
Delivery 30-45 Days 30 Days
60 Days 30-45 Days 0 Days
DATE: Apri1 161 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9440 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
RECOI MDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Vaughn
&.Associates of Dallas, for the amount of $3,068.00 with
delivery in 30 to 45 days after receipt of order.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of pre-school timber playground
equipment. We received two bids on similar equipment and
after evaluation by the Parks Department found the low bid
to be the best for the City of Denton.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet and insert picture of model
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Parks 5 Recreation
FISCAL IMPACT: This will be charged against the budget account
/100-003-0062-8112(9101).
Respectfully submitted:
ja r s HaA 04 V047A10
rtung
City Manager
Prepared by:
tin rs a C.P.M.
i M Purchasing Agent
Approved:
o marsnall, .
tie. Purchasing Agent
W1 9440
SID TITLE PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Jill LEA VAUGHN BIG TOYS
MIRACLE b ASSOCIAT S
FENED April 4, 1985 2 p.m,_ EQUIPMENT
MOUNT CO.
1
10 OTY, ITEM O VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 Pre-School Playground, NO 3,068.00
qu pmen ,
Net 30
Fob Denton
Delivery 0-45 f)AYr
} f 3
yr
IPP
• * ya
~v.•~ SI~• t;1 :rµ'7 i Y17V
Nall
y
M03
26Vx M*Arw
iO'HL
6 OW tWlwTknb@n
W0..6'0(3 NmRurw
04114--FMrtntnr~fs PoN
64111-Chat NN
00060•-OMntkq VN++M ~
99000-10 side
06000-r" 9wbV Anwft
arT.. i v ^
T•.• • • V.yad'.w
1624 x 15'3' Am 2613" A/IN
a X105 mot
grit
611'DWm*rTknbm + 814' GWrTMtWd
~I 111'O.D. Otdwrti+etd No Run"
141' O.D. 06MMr*d Pips "I DftM Id 2V, 334,41*
Docks at 2'0', Wo 61' 00040.0 sk&V Pam
0411~~ ~ 000~0•SM~rtn{1 YY4»M _._..r........,..
»r 06b00-tl ~ ~
06000 -Tin Sift Aswff**
62
,`f ;t .Mi InA° r ~F~^ ti ~l "L ,w tFr 4 rns4~en jK' h fi ~'C
^ ~G h f It i T t
0i 61.
I
r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY
PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCOR-
DANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES
FROM RREQUIRREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE WHEREAS, state law requires that certain contracts requiring
an expenditure oz payment by th' a City in an amount exceeding $5,000
be by competitive bids, except in the ease of public cAlamity
where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate coney to
relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property
of tba city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the
citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public
property, machinery or equipment; and
wHER Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that theEA8~ity Council approve all expenditures of more than
:3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every
act of the council providing for the a aditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public
cs..lsmity that sakes it necessary to act at once to appropriate
money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the
property of the city, or to protect the public health of the
citizens of the city, or to provide for uoforsan danage to public
ropparty, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the
allowing seerjjenvy purchases of materials, equipment, supplies ov
sawiees, as described in the "Purchase Orders' attached hereto,
are hereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
672 fl mow! an Co4th i3.311_m
614211 Auto 1 trod 53.776.m
674A8 _61 ord•N111 Ae~ri n i1.75A.m
67612 Noterola Cossunt Att ns ib.eag.m
67674 A.P. Croon 1A.QAQ.m
67719 Yersasr Enulsmset 13.AA3.54
m,,r a i rt r F. a !
.
r
J
SECTION II.
That because of such asergeacy, the City Manager or designated
emplo se is hereby authorised to purchase the materials, squi~sant,
supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase O;dera
and to make payment therefore in the amounts thArsin stated, such
eaergancy purchases being in accordance with the provisions of
4tate'law exempting such purchases by the City from the require-
seats of competitive bids,
SECTION III.
That thi:+ ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16 day of April , 1935,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLUM ALUM, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOAM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: '
J: ti i'.y"'`__i?grt x ~ z +,P• Y t; , 'b: c r,. rys v t ,t .ri w
a
J
DATE: Apri l' 161 ` 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 167248 FLOYD GLENN SMITH
RECO!li "TION: We recommend this Purchase Order in the amount of $3,341.00
be approved.
SUMMARY: This purchase is for the construction of headwalls for the
54" drainage pipes under the road at the landfill. Prices
for this purchase were established by the bid coDtract for
miscellaneous concrete repairs.
BACKGROUND: Purchase Order 167248
PROGRAMS,, DEPARTMEMTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Solid Waste Landfill
FISCAL IK°ACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds Landfill Bonds 1631-002-0803-7009.
Respectfully submitted:
044K
Chris Hartung
City Manager
Pr aced by:
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
• o n Marshall, C.P,M.
tle: Purchasing Agent
r~t, f :s~r ` d * ~~•'rw 1,. * .i ir,.n,~ •1 r S a 4~fk ! • qh v k °
(l :y
z r.' +p!` R Tr'd ~'r .r a.. d!Yq ~Rti 1
2ia f~IcKINNEY sr.? PURC A8 RDER DEfJTON, TX 79www
P. O. NUMBER DATENENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYP
67248 03.006/85 SOLID WASTE $
VENDOR: SMI51000 SHIP TO:
t~LOYD GLENN SMITH
P•nv BOX 1781
DENTON• -TX 76201:
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN
01 .631 .002 0803 '9004 1 . WADMALL* -TYPE 8/2 'S4" 'PIPES 3*341e00
i
BRAT
V
The City of Denton, Texas lu tax exempt - House Bill No. 20.
_34 Lo":
Reference P.O. Number on all K Shipments and Involoss.
Shipments are F.O.S. City of Denton, or as Indlosted,
send Invoices Tr/ Direct All hwpdd s TO.
City of Denton, Acoounis Payablo John Jr Marshall, O.P.M. Purchasing Agent
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX ?(Q01 Tom D. Shaw, O.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
Phone W7064M 817/1%l ill D1FW Metro 2874X42
The City of Denton is an equal opportunity employer
s ' fF r'r" '1 d
tr J. X ~,2 tr e ~ i V n i1 '17 ~
1 .lY F 4,. 5 L• r, ik , 1 1~' t ^4 1; tr
t.( S 4 t: 1. .~5j
DATE; April 16,^1986
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #67420 BUTLER 8 LAND
RECOMM MOATION: We recommend this purchase order to Butler b Land in the
amount of $3,776.00 be approved.
SUMMYIRY: This purchase order is for the emergency repairs to the
Federal Pacific Transformer located at the North Locust
Street Substation.
BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #17420
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Metering and Substations
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds Account #610-008-0253-8332
Respectfully submitted:
G. Cfiris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name: MIT Shaw, .P. M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved,
le: ll PurchasingrA gentI
tta
rW F' @y~ 1 ,'2ti f rT Cet ' 8Th ! _ R~ ,215 E. MCKINNEY $T. PURd;. (At" DENI!'ON; TX X01
6.0 0. NUMBER DATEIVENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPI
s
0 o3it9it~5 391.
suT~9roo , . _
VENDOR. SHIP TO:
BUTLER t LAND CITY OF DENTON.•ELEC ZIST~
P•o* BOX 8085 CENTRAL.;RECEIVING
C/0,13UTLER t LAND INC. 901•;TEXA3 STREET
• DALLAS, TX 75205 DENTON. TX 76201
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIFnON BID NO. LINE AMOUN
01 610 008 0253.8332 E582 1,W-5121-P-1016A REV SWITCH KIT7 283.00
02 610-008 0253 8332 E582 t :M-5121--P-0l1J4-1 REV .SWITCH CON 87.00
03 •6101 008 .0253 8332 E582 1 ;M-3141-0-0534-2 REV'MITCH CON, 57.00
04 610,008 02538332 ES82 I :W5121-P-2015-A TAP• HD COMP, 2.079.00
05 610 008, 0253 8332 E582 1 .SERVICE, ENCINE.EJLWED PAC EL'' 800000
06 610,008-0253 8332-E562 1 •AIR •PREiGfT '500000
The City of Denton, Texas ie tok exempt • House BIII Nd. 20. TOTAL.WOR P.O. 3.776.00
Referenoe P.O. Number on all K Shipments and Involoes.
ShIPMOnts are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indlcat I.
stud WOW" TO: MW AN k"Mes m
City of Denton, AacoUnts Payable John J. Marshall, O.P.M. par "Ing Agent
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
Phone W166szz3 S17155A 11 DIFW Metro 2074M
The City of Denton is an equal opportunity wployer
Y . 1. YY `j ! '#al l J 3 j 'I M1 l} L { . 5 .N / iR Y 4 }'0 IV `
DAT91 Apri 1 16, 19E
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
L'
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ,
FROM G, Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Emergency Purchase Order 167488
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the Emergency Purchase Order 167488
to Gifford-Hill American for the amount of $4,758.00, be approved for pay-
ment.
SUMMARY: This purchase order is for tapping assembly and to complete the
tapping on the new Loop 288 24" waterline. This construction will begin in
May and Gifford-Hill has a expected delivery date of 8 to 10 weeks.
BACKGROUND'- Per Sill Brown memo in reference to P.O. 167488.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Water a Sewer Field
Service
s, !
FISCAL IMPACT: This purchase will impact the 34-85 account 1623-008
0461-9',38.
ct ly u fitted:
Res
4 A~o 244440
G,--TK is a
City Manager
Prepared by:
it
Denise MannIng
Title Buyer
A" oVed!
rsnall
A~Vtrpgurchasfnq Agent
+ W6 W c .,:t a. s kn Sw n r .Y, Y
c° . x S; r r
1 J ~ ~t it ~ , l s 1. 'TS i i ~p tk fns xlg~
246 EMOWNNEI~ . ` R ,SE OROO ~ t tt tr DENTON, TX riot'
P. O:"NUMBER DATENENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPI
67488 04102/55 C17 5
GIF49000
VENDOR: SHIP TO:
GIFFORD-HILL AMERICAN WATER i SEVER'FIELO SERVICE
P•O• BOX 47127 CONFIRMATION ONLY
DALLAS* TX 75247 DO NOT DUPLICATE
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOUN
Ol 623 008 0461•,9138 1'30«X24wCC.TAPPING ASSEMBLY,' 29698.00
02 623 008 0461 9136 1:COMPLETE 2401TAPPING-30wMAIN 2*060.00
Tho City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House BIII No. 20. TOTAL FOR P.O. 49758.00
Reference P.O. Number on all K Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated.
tlerw invoices V. Direct All fngVIAH TO.
City of Denton, Aboounts Payable John J. Marshall, O.P.M. Purohealho APM
2% E Moklnney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, O.P.M. Aul, Purchasing Agent
Phone 8171566-6223 817J5AE!'B314 DNFW Metro 287-0042
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
.F n t 1; ~ _4 i
f
q'►; D CITY OF OWTON
11YlLJYl~t! M N N 0 R A N 0 U N
Y~~MMN~NNM~~ ANMrrr rr~M~~~N~~~r~~~~MN~M~~
TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Bill Brown, Superintendent Water/Wastewater Division
DATE: March 180 1985
SUBJ: Delivery of Request # 113833
The construction of the new 24" Loop M waterline will begin in May.
Pleace complete delivery of request #113833 for a 24" valve with gearing
and bypass by this time to prevent any construction delays.
BB:ch
cc: file
DATE: April 161 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung. City Manager
SUBJECT: Purchase Order #67572 MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this Purchase Order Number 67572 in the amount
of $6,948.00 be approved.
SUMMARY: This purchase is for the emergency replacement of the
communication console in the central dispatching
headquarters. The unit was severely damaged rendering
it inoperable and non-repairable.
BACKGROUND: Purchase rder 167572
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Central Dispatching
Metering 5 Sub Stations (Utility Dept.)
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds $39000.00 Electric Utility #610-008-0250-9227
3 948.00 Emergency Mgmt. #208-002-0007-8344
$
Respectfully submitt d:
.4 A40
Chris Hartung
City Manager
P are t
Name: Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Q2; ~
ILL _-K
h Marshall, C,P,M.
We: Purchasing Agent
A 1 t". f r ; 1I
' j Q ~~`la,t 04K215 MaKlNNEY ST. ~1~ ~Obt
P. 4. NUMBER DATENENDOR NO. DOCUMENT
67572 WOV85 C22
MOT52500
VENDOR: SHIP TO:
MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRIC-METERING AND
3320 BELT LINE 4SUB STATIONS .
DALLAS* TX 75234 CONFIRMATION ONLY
ATTN: JAMES MANTOS DO.NOT DUPLICATE
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUI
01 610 008 0250'.9227 E378 1 T-1617'COMMUNICATION CONSOLE 3000,900
02 208 002 0007°8344 1 1/2 FUNDS.FOR-ABOVE 399413*OC
INCLUDES: 1 T1617 H - $3499.00
1 L139 D.C. Board - 98.50 ,
1 L146 TN Board i 452.00 .
4. L368 Dual Receive Hd - 2716.00
1 L383 Line level - 112.00
1 L33 Volume Control - 70.50
CONFEMATIM.
The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. TDTAL Fna P &O. 8.+r~aR_en
Reference P.O. Number on alt M Shipments and InWoes.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated.
SOW In"loes To- Direct AN Irqulrlee TO:
City of Denton, Acaounie ppaayy", John J, Marshall, O..M. PuretwoInp AOM.
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TA X8201 TOM D. Shws, C.P.M. AA A& Purchalhg AgW
Phone 81?MOO 8223 817f5I mi i D" Metro 204M
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
77.
i r '1F5 .a l' .r..l f a,w ( .~'.T ear'. typ T.. ,n x•.~ do a f' e.e, l.%~.F q It.y1t r
E: April 16,1965
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 4`67579 A.P. GREEN
RECO"W"TION: We recommend Purchase Order 167579 to A.P. Green in the
estimated amount of $8,000.00 be approved.
SL"IKRY: This purchase order is for the emergency repairs to the
Unite 14 burner throats. Unit 14 is a power generator at
the Electric Generation Plant.
BACKGROUND: A. Purchase Order 167579
B. tiemo from Tom Chastain
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Production Plant
FISCAL IMPACT: This purchase will be funded from 1984-85 Budget Account
Number 610-008-0251-8339, Maintenance of Generating
Equipment.
Respectfully submitted:
4 A 04 P/At~o
Chris Hartung
City Manager
ared s
Name., Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
c.Gl~ •
o n J, Marshall, C.P.M,
itte: Purchasing Agent
,..r r ~gt y.
s r ri
Tie 1
POW, -A
- get if
2 X13 E' MoKINNEY ST. PUOHI1~ 9 t~NT~I, ~X ~IOi
P.0. NUMBER DATENENDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYPI
67579 04/03/65 505 S
GRE52001
VENDOR" SHIP TO:
A• P• GREEN CITY OF DENTON•
BIGELOW-LIPTAK CORPORATION ELECTRIC' PRODUCTION
4542 BRONZE WAY 1701-A SPENCER ROAD
DALLAS9 TX 75236 DENTON• TX 76205
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUP'
01 610 008 0251,°8339 £322 1 REBUILD 6 BURNER THROATS.LABOR 89000600
02 610 008 0251 8339 x312 1 MATERIALAND TRAVEL EXPENSE
• I
Tho City of Denton, Texas Is tax exemn • House Bill No. 20. TOTAL FOR P.O. 89000060
Reference P.O. Nfimber on all BIL, Shipmenta and Involoee.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or." Indicated.
Send Iniolaes TO'.
Okeoi AM Inquiries TO:
City of Donlon, Acoounts Payable John J. Marshall, O.P.M. Purchasing AgW
215 E McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Stow, 0.P.M. Alai. Purchasing Agent
Phone 817/b8fs•= 817158A•83i i DIM PAstro287-0042
The city of Donlon Is an equal opportunity employer
4{I 1Ftl F T ! J 1
i o y i r 1 7 %
~cx or t
M R M O R 71 N D U N
TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Tom Chastain, Superintendent, Electric Production Division
DATE: April 3, 1985
SUBJECT: Emergency Purchase
The attached purch4?e requisition 0113980 is for the
emergency repair of the Unit 04 burner throats. We
did not know this repair would be necessary until we
had the unit down getting ready for state inspection.
A. P. Green refractory people are the only people with
the equipment and people to do the job. We will help
them with labor and removing the old material. They
will do the new refractory work. it will take a week to
tan days for them to be ready to start the job and during
that time we will be doing the necessary preparatory
work.
T Chasta n Su
, perintendent
Electric Productior. Division
TC/bke:!S
I
.
R:
DATE: April 16,1995
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 167719 VERMEER EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Purchase Order 167719 to Vermeer Equipment be
approved in the amount of $3,083.54.
SUIMARY: This purchase order is for the materials to replace the
digging chain assembly on a Vermeer trenching machine.
BACKGROUND: Purchase Order 161719
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Vehicle Maintenance, Motor Pool
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds 1710-004-0598-3702 Vehicle Repair Parts
Respectfully submitted:
*4 4
4`Z r s artung
City Manager
Prepared by:
ame: om 0. Shaw, C.P.N.
Yitle: Assistant Purchasing AGent
Approvd:
o J. Marshall, M.
tie. Purchasing Agent
218 E. MCKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TA 711201
P. 0. NUMBER DATENENDOR NO. DOCUMENT
67719 03/29/85 C14 S
VER49000
VENDOR: SHIP TO:
VERMEER EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
BOX 201047 CONFIRMATION ONLY
DALLAS* TEXAS 75220 DO NOT DUPLICATE
ITEM A000UNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOU
)1 710 004 0598.8702 1 15266 CHAIN ASSY-COMPLETE .3083954
1ho City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House +3111 No. 20. TOT 0R PeOe 3, 088.64
Referonce P.O. Number on all BII., Shipments and Involoes.,,..
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated.
Bend Inroloes TO: Dhmtt AN WW A4" TO:
City of Demon, Accounts Payabts John J. Marshall, O.P.M. Purcheeinp Agent
218 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, O.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
Phone 81?M6.8223 80/6f1d-8311 DIFW Matto 2614M
The Oty of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
0893L
JO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD
OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS: PROVIDING FOR THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Cit~~rr has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for ttEe construction of public works or improve-
ments in accordance with the procedures of state law and City
ordinancs; and
WHEUW , the City Manager or a designated employee has
received and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or iiprovements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and
plans and specifications therefore; and
YHE>"So Section 2.36 (f) of the Coda of Ordieances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHVJL4S, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every
act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF '.RE CITY OF DENTON REMY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the following competitive bids for the construction of
public works or improvements, as described to the "Bid Invita-
tiona", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached
hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest
responsible bids:
BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
9405 Onyx 0ostructlon Co. 43,170.00 _
9435 Advance Tank-Texas, Inc. S 433,400,00
SgCTtON
That the acceptance and approval of the abovet conpetititve bids
shall not constitute a to4tpact belweell the City and the ppe~rson
tuDtittiog the bid for construction of such public works or
iaptacvweafis heroin_aceepted and approved, until such person shall
comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders
including the timely execution of a written cod-raet and furnishing
of performanes and paymet,t bonds, after notification of the avard
of the bid.
K rn
SECTION III.
That the City Manager is hereby authoriied to excecute all
necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction
of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids
accepted and approved hereino provided that such contracts are
made is accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Hid Proposals.
and documents relating thereto specifying the terms. conditions,
plans and specifications, standards, quantitites and specified
sums contained therein.
SECT_ 'IV.
That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive
bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and
improvements as authorised herein, the City Council hereby
authorizes the ernen~liture of funds in the manner and is the
amount. as specified in such approved bids and authorised contracts
executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V,
That this ordinance shall become effective immadiatel• upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the ~ S day of April 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST.
CITY Of DENTON,,TUM
APPROVED AS TO L14L. TORM s
DEDRA AW1 DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Of DENTON$ TEXAS
BYs
.aL
NOW-
T R jA
DATE: April 16, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City. Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19405 RAW WATER PUMP INSTALLATION
RECOMM AaVIOtl: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder,
Onyx Construction Co., for the amount of $43,170.00.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the installation of the pump that was
purchased earlier to be installed at the lake as shown
on the map.
,
BACKGROUND: Tabulation She6t
Memo from Bob Nelson
Project Location
PROGRAMS. DEPARTHMS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:_
Utilities 623-008-0460-9101-7941 Water Bond Funds
FISCAL FACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Respectful1 submitt d:
r s Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by: '
o in J.Marshali, C.P.M.
tIe: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
me john J ma ! rs a , C a F a M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
D f 4405
SID TITLE RAN WATER PUMP INSTALLATION RED RIVER ARDROUP ONYX TWIN C
CONST. CO, ASSOC. CONST. CO. INC.
OPENED April 2, 1985 2 p.m, INC.
ACCOUnT !
VENDOR r
OTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDO VF DOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
Raw Water Pump Installation 53,100.000 55.000 00 43,110.00 50,900.00
I
I
17
• April 100 198S
T0: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
FROM: R. Be Nelson, U rector of Utilities
SU9JECT: Consider Bid Opening for Capital Improvements Plan Project
18S-WP-1 (Raw Water Pump Installation) Bid 19405.
RECOMMENDATION
The Utility Department staff and Freese 6 Nichols, Inc.,
engineers, recommend award of the project, Raw Water Pump
Installation at the Raw Water Pump Station at Lake
Lewisville, to Onyx Construction Coupany, PO Box 1876S, Ft.
North, TX, 761180 in the amount of $43,170.
S UMM AR Y
The bids for this CIP project were opened April 2, 1985,
and the results are as follows:)
Onyx Construction Co. 43.170
Twin Cities Inc. S00900
Red River Const. Co. 1530100
Wardroup i Assoc., Inc. $SS0000
The Utility Department Staff and the Consultant, Freese 8
Nichols, Inc., have evaluated the bids and recommend
apppproval of Onyx Construction Co.'s, bid in the amount of
$43,170.
BACKGROUND
This CIP project will replace an old existing 6 MGD pump
with a new 8 MGD pump and will increase the pumping
ca city and provide the needed backup capability for the
existing pumps to be serviced more regularly.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton Municipal Utilities, Legal Department,
Water Treatment Plant, City Engineer and the Customers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budgeted Five Yr. CIP (8S-NP-1) $1670000
8 MGD Pump (approved earlier) $700760
Check & Cont. Valve (approved
earlier) $15,138
Pump installation est, (this bid) 43 170
Total $1290068
3S96U:8
Recommended Award:
Onyx Construction Co. $43,170
Source of Funds: 623-003-0460-9101-7941
Water Bond Funds
Respectfull submitted:
R. E. Nelson, P.E.
Director of Utilities
Prepared by:
Srrini 'dun aranoorthy
Civil Engineer
Water/Wastewater Department
APPROVED:
/J
t7u&'Va Has
Asst. Director of Utilities
Mater/Wastewater Department
EXHIBIT I Bid Summary
Location Map
3S96U:10
Pool
`I• f 1 . •fi}~1• 1
/ • 1
• S j • 'r •Ir'\
hot
i '
• 1 .rul `Jy 1
• pENTON' •
go 4%
1 ;tea . ,
mono It
Look%
5 sum
ol' r* or
J
mp; • :
l y
I' 1 • .
1 S 1.
7 7. L•~
1• - ff, r r POP
' 1 T PROJECT
•L' TION r
• ~ w. 'fie ` r , I
otolgis olft Ws "If.
~w tag 14 1
h\ • w Ar ♦1• 1
Pam,
+ A• •
ggog
~ J
.,go, lop. 4
u.IM•u IIIA A/ A►•I••A 11 A • • • f7 • 1
*ev e•s•e •fCt re t[;yuV3rC 8Vh r• p[
DATE: April 16 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: !Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9435 2MG GROUND STORAGE TANK
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder,
Advance Tank-Texas, Inc., for the amount not to exceed
$433,000.00.
SUMWIRY: The bids are for Capital Improvements at dater Production
as recommended by the Hogan and Rasor Water Distribution
Study.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
Memo from Bob Nelson of Utilities
Location Map
PW RWo DEPARTMEIITS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
5 Yr CIP (85-WP-2)
FISCAL. IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Respectfully submitte
.446
Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
John ars ha , C.P.M.
itle: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
me. o n
rs a , c,p.m.
itle: Purchasing Agent
W o 435
SID TITLE 2.OH1G Ground Storage Tank TANK NA-CON SAPULPA HALLOWAY ADVANCE
OPENED April 2i 1985 2 D.m. BUILDERS SERVICES TANK CO. CO., INC. TANK CO.
ACCOUNT i
P QTY, ITEH 0 VENDOR- VENDOR VENT
VENDOR 9MOOR VENWR VENDOR
&OR
r
1 Contract Pri-ce 456,000.00 72
_ 182 Days' 150 Days Q
i
r._
T
r••
•
•
1
16
April 10, 1985
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AGENDA ITEM
TO: CHAIRM~.Ai AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
FRO14: R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilitie3
SUBJECT
Consider Bid Opening for Capital Improvements Project
88S-WP-2 (Water Plant Upgrade- 2 MG Storage Tank), Bid
0943S.
RECOMMENDATION
The Utility Department Staff and Freese 8 Nichols,
Engineers, recommend award of the project 2 MG Ground
Storage Tank
at t Water Inc. , 9800 Nalden Road, Beaumo t~, tTex s1,an77707,~kIneXthe
amount not to exceed $433,000.00
SUMMARY
The bids for this capital improvement project were opened
April 2, 198S, and 0,,e results are as follows:
1
Advance Tank Texas Inc. $433,000
Tank Builders, Inc. $4S69000
Halloway Co , Inc. $4689273
Na-Con Services, Inc. $472,930
Sadulpa `Dank Co. $4730638
The Utility Department Staff and the consultant, Freese $
Nichols, Inc., have evaluated the bids and recommend
approval of Advance Tank-Texas, Inc.', bid in the amount of
5433,000.
BACKGROUND
The Hogan and Rasor Water Distribution Study of May, 1981,
recommended a minimum of 4MG of additional ground storage
at the Water Plant to meet the requirements of the State
board of Insurance. This capital improveeents Croject will
add an additional 2 MG to the existing S MG ground storage
capacity by 1985. The remaining 2 MG capacity requirement
is being included in the FY86-90 Capital Improvement
Program for the new Water Plant.
3S96U:2
,I
F' s 9 K FX Y'' is v 1'L q'n~i' R ' M- 6a
I
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted Five Year CIP (8S-WP-2) $440,000
Recommended Award:
Advance Tank-Texas, Inc. $433,000
Source of Funds: 623-008-0460-9101-7939
(water bond funds)
Prepared by: Respectfully, Submitted,
5r n un araooort y
Civil Engineer a son,
Water/Wastewater Department Utility Administration
Approved:
e. 129"
av an, P,H,
Asst. Dir. of Wtr/WW Utilities
EXHIBIT: I Bid Summary
II Location Map
3596U:3
y P f f , ti. V 5 4 4 • i..' a ri.. 1° a '...y e ! YY 5'f' . i Iv 4F,1 !
, .4 ! ~ ' i t } ~ 1'• •1.0P,a ~y;'4 ( tie i j''~. v'~~ ••+~'Po`
1tit 1 ~ • • ' ~rw•
' • ~ `l 3 oaf (
otwrgN 1
ry t
y ~ r
t r s • 1
1
;Aim
-.~~r 1
PUNT
' . . l•'
• ~ 1 ~ ~t ' 1 s' 1
• ♦ IL rw • 1f e
r 1r \ • ~ ~i 1 r.
t
ii ♦ f \ 1 es , V
•r1 ♦ vv
' 1+./111
rrlrl ~ ~i' ~ . L:
' MCA "win wo 04
wl~ loop
~ Z fr ~ l •.r.rn f
-0011
r
1 W Jw i '
t ~
Ulm
r
r1
rr`
..,.•.i.• u•rIA^.f11TAIr •A TCV CVATC -CDT PC .ajrW*aV1t 0}y(%4: Al 1':
t
•
•
i
CITY COUNCIL'RRPORT FOWAT
TO, Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS REGARDING THE PETITION OF HAMMBTT & NASH, INC. FOR
ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 361.708 ACRES SITUATED IN THE H. MAY
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 807 AND THE V. E. GAILOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT 4529 AND
BEGINNING HEST OF FM 2164 (N. LOCUST) APPROXIMATELY 7,000 FEET NORTH
OF HERCULES LANE (A-16).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommetids public hearings be held on May 14 and May 28.
May 28 action requires a special called meeting of the city council.
Final action on July 239 1985 would also require a special called
meeting.
The Planning and Zoning Commission will make its recommendation
May 8, 1985.
SUMMARY:
A preliminary land use plan for this tract has been brought before
staff for very general comments. No official change in coning
request has been filed. This site begins approximately 2,000-3,000
feet north of the Texas Instruments tract.
BACKGROUND:
A Pre-Design Conference was held by the Development Review Committee
on January 15, 1985 concerning possible light industrial (LI) zoning
on th'c parcel. The site is located in a low intensity area and
comments of the Development Review Committee are attached for
information.
P 0GRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
No existing structures or residents are affected.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Rectf y e mi ted:
•
0. Chris Hartung /
P epare4 b : City Manager
.Crn
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Appcov
Jeff Msye
Director of Planning
and Comunity Development 11268
t; { a:,,: r ~N; ,.xn nl q•'j'Vi ,y
~ LL s
NO.
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATF,, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
THE PRO.70SED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN BY
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR
TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THE CITY COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
On the day of 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M.
in the City Zrouncil Chm bars of the ?Juu:.ipal Building of the City
of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing,
giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
property described below.
On the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.M.
in the City `~ouncil Chambers o the unicipal Building of the City
of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing
giving all interested persona the right to appear and be heard on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
follcwing described property, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the Y. E.
Gailor Survey, Abstract 452 and the H. May Survey, Abstract 807
and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as described in
Ordinance No. 74-36, Tract 111, said point lying 500 feet west of
and perpendicular to the center line of FM 2164, sai$ point also
lying south O v29'36" west 1,14.57 feet and north 89 54'04" west
450.01 feet from the interse4:tion of the west right-of-way line of
FM 2164 with the south boura_ry line of the T. Polk Survey,
Abstract 999;
THENCE south 0°19'36" west, 500 feet west of and perpendicular to
the center line of FM 2164 and along the said present city limits,
a distance of 2,119.77 feet to a ,point for a corner,
THENCE north 88°43'00" west, a distance of 4,354.46 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE north 1°02'00" east, a distance of 993.3 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 88°36'00" west, a distance of 2,456.0 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 21°06'00" west, a distance of 160.0 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 0°40'22" east, a distance of 2,074.48 feet to a point
for a corner in the north boundary line of the said M- May Survey
and the south boundary line of the J. M. Stewart Survey, Abstract
1150;
THENCE south 89011'35" east, along said survey lines, a distance
of 3,402.51 feet to a point for a corner;
A-16/HAMMETT & NASH, INC./PACE ONE
d 7777-77,
7'8 7 N` ".4 7 r",
, s
W.
Alt 't
THENCE south 0°35'53" west, a distance of 1,190.83 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 89°54'04" east, a distance of 3,427.71 feet to the
place of beginning and containing 361.71 acres of land, more or
less.
SECTION II.
The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized
and directed to cause notice of such public hearings to be
published once it a newspaper having general circulation in the
City and in the aoove described territory not more than forty days
nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public
hearings, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act
(Article 970x, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes).
SECTION 111.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
following its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DFAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
A-16/HAMHETT i HASH, INC./PAGE TWO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT:
The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add tie
following described territory to the corporate limits of the City
of Denton, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the V. E.
Gailor Survey, Abstract 452 and the M. May Survey, Abstract 807
and more particul,rly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the ppresent city limits as described in
Ordinance No. 74-36, Tract I:.I, said point lying 500 feet vest of
and perpendicular to the center line of FM 2164, said point also
lying south 0°29'36" west 1,142.57 feet and north 89°54'04" west
450.01 feet from the intersection of the west right-of-way line of
FM 2164 with the south boundary line of the T. Polk Survey,
Abstract 999;
THENCE south 0°29'36" west, 500 feet west of and perpendicular to
the center line of FM 2164 and along the said present city limits,
a distance of 2,129.77 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 88°43'00" west, a distance of 4,354.46 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE north 1°02'00" east, a distance of 943.3 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 88°36'00" west, a distance of 2,456.0 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 21006'00" vest, a distance of 160.0 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north C°40'21" east, a distance of 2,074.48 feet t a point
for a corner in the north boundary line of the said M. May Survey
and the south boundary line of the J. M. Stewart Survey, Abstract
1150;
THENCE south 89°11'35" east, along said survey lines, a distance
of 3,402.51 feet to a point for a corner,
THENCE south 0°35'53" west, a distance of 1,190.83 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 89°54'04" east, a distance of 3,417.71 feet to the
place of beginning and containing 361.71 acre, of land, more or
less.
A Public Hearing will be field by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of ,
1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City Council Chambers f ttfie
Municipal. Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in
the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
A Public Heariag will be held by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of ,
A-16/HAMMETT & NASH, INC./PACE ONE
i
1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. In the City Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in
the things end matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
RAYOIE
C17Y Of DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
ALLEN, CHARLOTTE I
A-16/HAMMETT 4 NASH, INC./PACE TVu
~r 41 ! a n t . r~ / ' •e
I '
J'
J
;I
• ~ J v iv.. v. n• 1~•:::
-30
X., 7
X X.
FM-2164 .
i If 1 l
L..•wr I~~.---
tot
'1 5 R
s e ~'`•43k' S°. 5 d k'
1. e ~a
71
h- J, ,-s 5 '+tl d3
t s. r t. C. -
A-16
April 08, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
April 09, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
April 16, 1985* City Council sets date, time and place
for public hearing
May 01, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
May 03, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
may 06, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
May 07, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
May o8, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission makes
recommendation
May 140 1985* City Council holds public hearing
May 15, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
May 17, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
May 200 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
May 21, 1985 Submit city council agenda back-up
may 288 1985* Special called meeting of the City
Council for second public hearing
June 101 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
June 11, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
June 16, 1985" City Council institutes annexation
proceedings
June 20, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle
June 23, 1985 Publish ordinance
July 15, 1985 Submit city council agenda item
July 160 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
July 23, 1985* Final action by City Council at special
called meeting
*Denotes action by the City council
09648
~1 ? _ M"r Ayr', g x A:.. v ; .fit TY .•f 1.. a1 '_T.',:i Fir a d .a 5:1
Minutes
Development Review Committee
, January 15, 1985
DRC Members Presents Harlan Jefferson, Don McLaughlin, Robert
Hageman, David Ellison, Harry Persaud, David
Salmon, Robbie Baughman and Ray Rumfield.
Engineer, Planner,
Architect, Surveyor,
or other development
interests presents James Cozby, Bill Onsh
XIX. Review of Proposed Annexation and Light Industrial Zoning
383.758 Acre Tract in the H. May Survey Abstract 807 and the
V. E. Gailor Survey Abstract 452
A. Engineering
1. Seems to have some small drainage channels running
through tract including some ponds.
2. Since tract is proposed light industrial we strongly
recommend that detention be used to handle the large
amount of runoff.
3. This area beyond the boundaries of our thoroughfare
plan. Since its proposed use is light industrial and
near proposed Loop 288 some collector streets will be
required if approved. Requirements for an arterial
will be d;scussed when more information is provided.
4. No further comments due to lack of information.
B. Transportation Engineering
1. Adequate right-of-way on Locust will be required at
time of zoning and/or platting.
2. No comment on annexation.
C. Water and Sewer
1. Nearest water line is 4,50U' south on Locust (P.M.
2164) at Hercules at well. May not be enough fire
flow (3,000 g.p.m. required). ,
2. Nearest sanitary sewer is at Seline and Stuart Road.
Approximately 3,000' south and 3,000' east of
property. A 10" sewer at this point runs down to
Cooper Creek outfall. Study is required to see if
this 10" sewer system has capacity to accomodate
proposed zoning and/or development,
'ID'., P~R
l 1 ~
Minutes
Development Review Committee
V. E. Gailor Survey
January 15, 1985
Page 2
C. Water and Sewer (Continued)
3. No pro rata charges required.
4. Pro rata agreement may be had.
5. oversize agreement required.
6. Outside city limits approval not required if annexed.
D. Electric
Dual service area with Denton County Electric cooperative
electric service from the City of Denton could be arranged
at customer request. Service would be per Commercial/
Industrial Regulations.
E. Fire
1. Fire hydrants required every 300 feet.
2. Must provide ;n all weather driving surface on not
less than 20 fret of unobstructed width, with ade-
quate roadway turning radius capable of supporting the
imposed loads of fire apparatus before construction
begins.
3. Fire hydrants and water system must be operational
before construction begins.
4. The access roadway shall be extended to within 150
feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the
first story of any building.
5. Uniform Fire Code, 1982, is applicable.
6. All the above comments are to be affective if proposed
zoning and annexation are passed (approved).
F. Building Inspection
No comments at this time.
G. Lone Star Gas
No comments at this time.
H. G.T.E.
No representative was present.
ti vx 1 n5
Minutes
Development Review Committee
V. t. Gailor Survey
Janue.y 15, 1985
Page 3
I. Cox Cable
J. Solid Waste
Service not available, because the development is outside
of the city limits. Service will be provided if annexed.
K. Parks and Recreation
No representative was present.
L. Planning and Cormunity Development
1. This site is located in a low intensity area and staff
would strongly oppose light industrial zoning. The
current Development Guide policies on which staff
Lases its recommendations call for predominantly low
density residential land use emphasis. Limited high
intensity uses such as commercial/retail/neighborhood
service to office may be permitted up to 6 acres total
within 1/2 mile distance or half the length of
intensity area study boundaries.
2. If there is an active interest in high intensity
development and zoning in this a;.ea, staff recommends
that the owners or development interest formally
request that the Development Guide iolicies and low
intensity designation for this area be changed to a
high intensity area. Staff will not support such a
proposal from a recommendation standpoint, but will
assist in processing request so the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council can make a decision.
3. The Development Review planning section is also
available for consultation if a formal change in
zoning petition is submitted regardless of the nature
of the request. Staff is also available for more
detailed discussion of Development Cuide policies and
the implementation process.
1 T
'
4 IrY ~ ~ R " DATE! 04/1
~ 6735° ,
CITY CG CIL REPORT PORNAT
TO Mayor and Members of the City Council
FCON: 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS REGARDING THE PETITION OF HAMMETT A NASH, INC. FOR
ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 160.9855 ACRES SITUATED IN THE JOHN A.
BUkNS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130, AND TH% THOMAS POLE: SURVEY, ABSTRACT
999, AND BEGINNING WEST OF FK 2164 (N. LOCUST) APPROXIMATELY 9,000
FEET NORTH OF h3RCULES LANE (A-19).
RECOMMENDATI0ii:
Staff recommends that public hearings be held on May 14 and May 28,
1985. A special called mfaeting will be required if the May 28
recommendation is acceptable. A special called meeting is also
required on July 23, 1985 if the proposed schedule is acceptable.
The Planning and Zonl;g commission will make its recommendation on
may 8, 1985.
SUMMARY:
This voluntary petition for annexation was submitted by Hammett &
Nash, Inc., agents for the owners. A change in zoning roqu:.t is
anticipated, but very little information has been revealed.
BACKGROUND:
NA
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
One residence with an undetermined number of occupants is within the
affected area. The owners have indicated that the residence will he
vacated by the time of final annexation action, however, if occupied
after annexation, basic city services must be provided.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined at this time.
Respapyfu sub d:
i
0. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Pared by
David Ellison
synio. ?tanner
Appr e
Jeff iNey
Director ur Planning
and Comunity Development 11256
7 7
1053L
.
NO.
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLAC3 FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN BY
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR
TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
On the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M.
in the City-Council Cham ers6 F-t e -Municipal Building of the City
of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing
giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
property described below.
On the day of , 1965, at 7:00 o'clock P.M.
in the City Council Cham6eis of the Mfunicipal Building of the City
of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing
giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
following described property, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the John A.
Burns Survey, Abstract 130 and the Thomas Polk Survey, Abstract
999 and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established in
Ordinance No. 74-36, Tract III, said point lying 500 feet west of
and perpendicu Mr to the cente! line of FM 2164, said point also
lying north 88 21'35" west 456.75 feet from the southeast corner
of a tract conveycd to J. A. Williams by deed recorded in Volume
4250 Page 207 and the west right-of-way line of FM 2164;
THENCE north 88°21'35" west, a distance of 2,030.03 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE north 2°41'32" west, crossing the north boundary line of
said Polk Survey, same being the south boundary line of said Burns
Survey, a distance of 2,133.33 feet to a point for a corner,
THENCE south 87°54'50" west, a distance of 734.43 feet to a point
cor a corner, in the west boundary line of said Burns Survey, same
being the southwest corner of the E. Prichett Survey, Abstract
1025 and the northeast corner of the J. Stewart Survey, Abstract
1150;
THENCE north 2°56'51" west along said survey lines, a distance of
10281.39 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 88°24'36" east, a distance of 1,427.61 feet to a
point;
THENCE north 88°33'11" east, a distance of 1,295.36 feet to a
point for a corner in said present city limits;
THENCE south 3°22'23" east, 500 feet west of and parallel to the
a®nter line of FN 2164, a distance of 3$24.23 feet to the place
of beginning and containing 180.98 acres of land, more ur less."
A-19/HAHMETT 6 NASH, INC./PACE 1
SECTION It.
The Mayor of the City of Denton, Te.css, is hereby authorized
and directed to cause notice of su.h public hearings to be
published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the
City and in the above described territory not more than forty days
nor less then twenty days prior to the date of such public
hearings, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act
(Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes).
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
following its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of. , 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWART9 MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
1'4 SECRETAAY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADA.41 DRAYOVLTCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.~
A-19/HAMHETT L NASH, INC./PAGE 2
1111111111010 a
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GI:EN TO ALL INTCRESTED PERSONS THAT:
The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the
following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of
Denton, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated is
the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the John A. Burns
Survey, Abstract 130 and the Thomas Polk Survey, Abstract 999 and more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established in
Ordinance No. 74-36, Tract III, said point 1 ing 500 feet vest of and
perpendicular, to the center line of FM 2164, said point also lying
north 88021'35" west 456.75 feet from the southeast corner of a tract
conveged to J. A. Williams by deed recorded in Volume 425, Page 207
and the west right-of-way line of FM 2164;
THENCE north 88°21'35" west, a distance of 2,030.03 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 2°41'32" vest, crossing the north boundary line of said
Polk Survey, same being the south boundary line of said Burns Survey,
a distance of 21133.33 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 87°54'50" vest a distance of 734.43 feet to a point for
a corner, in the west boundary line of said Burns Survey, sr..ae being
the southwest corner of the E. Prichett Survey, Abstract 102S and the
northeast corner of the J. Stewart Survey, Abstract 1150;
THENCE north 2°56'57" vest along said survey lines, a distance of
1,281.39 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 88°24'36" east, a distance of 1,427.61 feet to a point;
THENCE north 88°23'11" east, a distance of 1,295.36 feet to a point
1'or a corner in said present city Uvits;
THENCE south 3°22'23" east, 500 feet vest of and paral.lei to the
center line of FM 2164, a distance of 3,524.23 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 180.98 acres of land, more or less.
A Public Hearing viii be held by and before the City Ctuncil of
the Cit7 of Denton, 'texas, on the day of 'Municipal
at
7:00 o clock P. M. in the City `Council Chem era o the Municipal
Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in
the above proposal annexation. At said time and place all such
persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of ali said
matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters
herein mentioned, will take notice.
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City ^ouncil of
the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 19850 at
7.00 o clock P. M. in the City ouncil Cham ere o t e Municipal
Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in
the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such
persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said
matters and things, alt persons interested in the things and matters
herein mentioned, will take notice.
RICHARD 0.
HAM
CITY Of DENMNj TEXAS
ATTEST:
z ,
A-19/BANMETT 6 HASH, INC.
E '
__--:Jj
• ':.till: }!}~l:p•; V\'
III ''l: •d•'::':':\'l.'lj{'`':r
I-A
44
• ` S...)':{jC1
sue.:' • . , .y.. :...A 1: V. 1.\'. .
ww~
k•M_2164 .
bwft,
r ; F 'r
A-19
ANNEXATION 'SCHEDULB;.L??'I„P
April 08. 1985 Submit City council agenda item
April 09, 1985 Submit city council agenda back-up
April 15,.1985* City Council sets date, time and plach
for public hearing
May 01, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
May 03, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
May 06, 1985 Submit Citv council agenda item
May 071 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
May 080 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission makes
recommendation
May 14, 1965# City Council holds public hearing
May 15, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
May 17, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
May 20, 1965 Submit City Council agenda item
May 21, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
May 28, 1985* Special called meeting of the City
Council for second public hearing
June 10, ).985 Submit City Council agenda item
June 11, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
June 180 1985* City Council institutes annexation
proceedings
June 20. 1965 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle
June 23, 1985 Publish ordinance
July 15, 1485 Submit City council agenda item
July 160 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
July 23, 1985* Final action by City council at special
called meeting
*Denot6a action by the City Council
09641
17
Aprils lb, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N_
TOs MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF 1HE CITY COUNCIL
FROMs G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
9U8iECTs
CONSIDER ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 25-6.1 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASs REENACTING A NEW
SECTION 23-6.1 TO PROVIDE FOR THE AVERAGE BILLNG OF UTILITY
BERVICESI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
8ECOM.EIbj28T I ON s I
The Public Utility Board, at its reguJar meeting of February
69 1983, approval the proposed ordinance and recommended the
ordinance making changes in the City's Code of Ordinances,
Equalized Payment Plan, Section 25-6.1.
put" Rys
The Equal Payment Plan (EPP) program has boon reported by
the Customer Service Division as causing some difficulty
due, in part, to changes in rates. In reviewing EPH,
several problemo have become apparent.
1) The computer generated EPP bill tends to b4 too high and
is causing a substantial oeverpaymert by customers. This
seems to be caused by an estimate sewer billing based on
actual water consumption rather than the substantial lower
winter average consumption as in the current rate ordinance.
This problem mmy be corrected by including the current
computation for residential wastewater billing In the
ordinance.
2) The average billing ordinance allows for some discretion
as to whether a particular customer should have a histoery
at a particular address when calculating the EPP amount.
The ordinance was passed assuming such a twelve month
history for the customer who wishes to use equalized
billing. (see attached memo from the Director of Finance,
April 240 1960 which was presented to the PUB when the
program was adopted.) Since no two families live alike and a
family may not utilise utilities in the some manner at two
dlffiw#ht addresses, 'it is preferable to have a twelve month
histagy far a customer at a particular address.
3) the credit history requirements seem to indicate that a
customer who normally pays his/her bill an time but has a
problem paying high seasonal bills and gets behind may not
be eligible for the program. This defeats the major- intent
04 the equalized payment program--to level high and low
bills for easier planning on the part of our customers. As
a correction, the amendment includes a proposal to allow the
Utility Account Review Committee, a staff group which
reviews customer requests for payment of overdue accounts,
to recommend a customer be placed on EPP in addition to , i
monthly payment to correct the overdue amount as a condit:-
of the contract.
A revision of the EPP ordinance would clarify these matters
and avoid misinterpretation of the program guidelines. So,
a suggested revision of the ordinance that corrects thwas
major problems areas, as well as other minor changes that
were made to assist the Customer Service Department with
implementation, is attached for consideration.
$ACK9ROUNDI
The original EPP ordinance was adopted In 1950 with the
intent that customers be allowed to benefit from a leveling
of utility billing. At the time the system was first set
up, the customers had only two periods to settle-up, one
fall month and one spring month. The program was changed to
allow the customer a full twelve (12) months so as to
realize the greatast benefit from EPP. The original
ordinance was written to adopt the billing system (TRES)
program which was built into our customer accounting
package. With rates changing and costs increasing, the
system is not attracting new customers at a time when they
would likely benefit most. Our Customer Service Division
would prefer we not advertise or make any strong effort to
lncrehse the number of customers on the equalized billing
untit the above changes are put into effect.
PROORAMt`s;QEPAATMENTSl_OR DROUP$ AFFECTED
The basic impsct of making the recommended changes would be
to allow more customers to utilize the equalized billing
system and be more confident that their bill is not out of
line with anticipated usage. A corolary benefit could be a
batter cash flow for the City. The changes for the most
part make it easier for the customer to utilize the service.
The one place where more stringent standards are played is
for the customer to have at least twelve (12) months history
at the address where EPP is requested.
Respectfully submitteds
E~
rrrrrr-r4.r rrr.~lr~rriirr
ff. Chri#Hartung
City Manager
77
Prepared Byi
Charles Cryan
Utility Budget and Rate Administrator
APPROVED BYi
Robert E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
ATTACHMENTSi
EXHIBIT I Proposed Revised Ordinance
EXHIBIT II Present Ordinance j
EXHIBIT III Memo from Director of Finance
EXHIBIT IV Bill Comparisions
EXHIBIT V Minutes% P blic Utilities Boar6 {
Februarys 1985
3A
MEN
777
. a
.,a• if.' '7 v'n'~ a
EXHIBIT I
Sec. 25-6.1. Average billings for services.
Any residential utility customer of the City may be billed for
electricals water, sewer, and sanitation services based upon an
average bill for the customer's previous twelve (12) months of
service with the City at the service address where average
billing is requested in accordance with the following provisionss
(a) The customer shall make written application to the City
on a form furnished by the City requesting average
billing and will be bound by the provisions of this
section.
(b) Upon receipt of such applications the City will compute
the average bill as described below. The customer shall
be billed this average bill for the first eleven (11)
billings . On the twelfth billings the City will
credit the custoeer's acccrint for the accumulated
amount of the average bill in excess of the actual
twelve (12) months' consumption and charges or bill the
amount for actual consumption and charges in excess of
the average bill provided for herein. The customer
shall have until the due date for the twelth (12) bill
to pay any additional billings.
(1) Water and Electric. The City will compute the
customer's total consumption of water and
electricity for the previous twelve (12) months.
These annual consumptions will be divided by
eleven (11) to produce estimated usages per month
for the next twelve (12) months. The water and
electric portions of the average bill will be
calculated using those estimated usages and the
rate schedules that are applicable to the customer
at the time the average bill is computed.
(2) Sewer. The City will compute the customer's
average monthly water consumption for the prcvious
three winter months of December, January, and
Febuary that occurred within the most recent
twelve (12) months. This average monthly rate of
consumption shall not Rxceed twenty-five thousand
(25,000) gallons. The monthly average of these
three winter months will be multiplied by twelve
(12) and divided by eleven (11) to produce an
estimated effluent per month for the next twelve
(12) months. The sewer portion of the average
bill for the next twelve (12) mohthe3 will be
calculated using this `estimated effluent flow and
the rate Schedule applicable
to the customer at
the time the average bill is computed
.
fc) The City may provide average billing for utility
.
tip. .
service(s) based upon the customer's credit rating, the
customer's credit history with the City for utility
services, or upon request of the Utility Account Review
Committee as a condition of the City's contract with
the customer for payment of an overdue account or
accounts, or any other financial -eason. Upon receipt
avid approval of credit rating ie customer's written
and signed application shall constitute an agreem•tnt
between the custneier and the City to comply with .:.e
terms of this section and the average billing policies
of the City.
(d) Late payment, payment received after the bill due date,
more than twica in a twelve (12) month poriod shall be
cause for discontinuance of average billing. Failure
to pay after the second payment due date will be ca-Aso
to discontinue average billing. Should the customer be
removed from the average billing program for failure to
pay the bill in a timely manner (late payment) such
customer may not rrqualify for such program until after
the expiration of three (3) months. After a second
removal from the program, a customer may not requalify
for such program until after the expiration of one
year.
•
ire wr + r . 1Sl Vi{,~ S w Jy 7 7~ h R
NO.
AN O"INANCE REPEALINO SECTION 25.6.1 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, MUS; REENACTING A NEW SECTION 25.6.1 TO PRO-
VIDE FOR THE AVERAGE BIM NG OF UTILITY SERVICES; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DCNTON 4EREDY ORDAINS1
SECTION I.
That Section 2S-6.1 ("Average Billings for Services") of Chapter
25 if the Code of Ordinan:es is hereby repealed.
SECTION it.
That a new Section 25.6.1 of Chappter 25 of the Code of Ordi-
nancas is hereby enacted to read as follow4t
Section 2S-6.1. Average billings for services.
Any residential utility customer of the City may be billed for
electrical, water, sever, and sanitation services based upon an
average bill for the customer's previous twelve (12) months of
service with the City at the service address where average billing
is requested in accordance with the following provisions:
(a) The customer shall make written application to the City
on a form furnished uy the City requesting average bill-
ing in accordance witn the provisions of this section.
(b) Upon receipt and approval of the application, the City
will compute the average bill as daacribed below. The
customer shall be billed this average bill for the first
sloven (11) billings after approval of the application.
On the twelfth billing, the City will credit the
customer's cceount for the accumulated amount of the
average bill in excess of the actual twelve (12) months'
consumption, and charges or bill the amount for a4~tual
consumption and charges In excess of the average billing
provided for herein. The customer shall have until the
due date for the twelth (12) bill co pay any additional
billings.
(1) Water and Electric. The City will compute the cus-
tomer's total consumption of water and electricity
for the previous twelve (12) months. These annual
consumptions will be divided by alevea (11) to pro-
duce estimated usages per month for the next twelve
(12) months. The water and electric port0na of the
average bill will he calculated using these
estimated usages and the rate schedules that are
applicable to the customer at the teas the average
bill is computed.
(2) Sewer. The City will compute the custmer's average
monthly water consumption for the previous three
winter months of Daceeber, January, and February
that occurred within t'na most recent twelve (12)
months. This average tionthly rate of consumption
shall not exceed twenty-five ~.houtand (25,000)
PAGE l
ziC ly.I '.~V a. Isle r'~~ r .~.'/d h d s~
1>I wee e } to r~u a a l i~ v C° I, e e ar ' i
gallons. The monthly average of these three winter
months will be multiplied by twelve (12) and divided
by eleven (11) to produce an estimated effluent per
month for the next twelve (12) months. The sewer
portion of the average bill for the next twelve
months will be calculated using this estimated
effluent flow and the rate schadule applicable to
the customer at the time the average bill is
computed.
(c) The City may provide average billing for utility ser.
vice(s) based upon the customer's credit rating, the
customers credit history with the City for utility
services, or upon request of the Utility Account Review
Committee as a condition of ths City's contract with
the customer for payment of an overdue account or
accounts, or any other financial reason. Upon receipt
and approval of credit rating, the customer's written
and signed application shell constitute an agreement
between'the customer and the City to c;Aply with the
terms of this section and the average billing policies
of the City.
(d) Any late payment (payment received after the bill due
date) of any averse billing which occurs more than
twice in a twelve (12) month period shA:ll be cause for
discontinuation of average billing. Failure to pay
after the second payment due date will also be cause to
discontinue average billing. Should the customer be
removed from the average billing pro ram for failure to
pay the bill in a timely manner Mete Payment) such
customer may not requalify for such program until after
the expiration of three (3) months. After a second
removal from the program, a customer may not requalify
for such program until after the expiration of one year.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED .his the day of 1983.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY CT DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Of DEMONo TEXAS
BY:. • 1; f tt , nj.•
PAGE 2
CIfl~dlf O<M11 ,111~LA'~ aM cLoAI. MLMG i MWYQ . TMAI ufii i TLLVW M ill?l Is<4
• w
Ala Ieb wlN,o, lfirector of Yt111ti« •
lMOt M. N. Netiary, blrectrr of /loeece
MRI *11 ZI, IM
Mich #A" 1111114
The lleida with M~i for ravel of ~lattached everep "Isi ce by =Mt!►~ belso
~r9640
0
ts tuUteguaet approval by the City Caftil, this Keyrae to Wix wA,
some
teMPOsr froP-M have boo cmleted snd copies of moople bills end eetiaes ~
we provided for the ieard's rovier. t
As previously diroeted by the Ioard, the Oasai~ss blIll" • pmtdn for
a bill based an a ruanIn over for the prwims 12 =plus IX of the
WWO 11 b 1111aq; periods and sett ier of acoe s M • gw y,
e custaw stint have heed credit Old awt have lived at the save leeat4M for
Additionally It Ives L I a #%ste.or rill w arteeattally dlt MtIMW
from the pr"raw if tMy haw amt paid their bill IN full before the account
Is billed alisio. The custootiw will be astifled after u dw that the aeeeunt
has Not boon paid and that further deity a" cause reeevet iw the prWNL
Any custoswti*s pryrl" beyond the 111th day weld accrue to salty cbtrip to the
u01114I4 WWI . 14 the "t that a custmw Is dlscoatlaued froth the
road , theeyy ma a"al ityweord he pr oaf r three eeaths. After the
Custows will be able to toter the prWart after gwHfyIr4, at any Use
duriol the year. We will require tho to sign in yrowsat stipulat hp the
tom Of the Pew"*
1 Will be available to discuss my aspects of the prWo with the kvd.
11 M MrN~
VTI "•1 e 0'
t k,4 _ Y ry .4a r G P"
r'
i
1
AVERAGE BILL per CUSTOMER
in the
RESIDENTIAL RATE CLASSES
aver
Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal
78/79 79/80 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/34
average bill $36.30 840.32 $42.77 "4.32 633.21 854.68
% over previous yr 11% 6% 27% -2Y. 3% 9%
average kwh 796 8811 891 853 766 304
over previous yr 12% 0'/. -4% -10% 3% 1:1'/.
k
f 1, S q ni P t M!
•.i
J f J 1 I L f.' 1 • F~4
C Y. 4 L ' I N H I T 0
i1+j4r 'Plp° .
s+i~
ACCT -000-13 .
0l -I-O1 NAME TEST 004440 TLtf MW
SERV ATE R2 MTR-NOR 00030260 3 of 03 M1m•Tlt
ELE MTR S CYCLI 07
RDG-DTE MTR-RDG DYS CONSUMP a USAGE-REV FUEL-FAC FUEL-AMT TAX MTIF-BILL
30-84040850 29 844, A 47.64 .0223000 18.99 .00 66.63
1. 01-84 040006 30 1159 A 81.46 .0125126 14.49 .00 95.95
10-02-84 OZ8848 28 1433 A 99.13 .0118787 17.02 .00 116.13
09-04-84 037415 33 2337 C 171.96 .0055295 14.03 .00 185.99
08-02-84 034878 31 2200 A 149.62 .0043023 9.46 .+)0 159.08
07-02-84 032678 28 1689 A 128.77 .00047P3 .90 0V 129.67
06-04-84 030789 33 1242 C 87.78 .0040708 5.06 .00 92,04
.Z-02-84 029547 28 666 A 46.18 .0002188 .13- .00 46. 05
04-04-84 028881 30 743 A 50.99 .0611908 .88 .00 51.87
03-03-84 0228138 28 745 A 50.67 .011,9909 8.19 .00 58.86
02-+:+6-84 027,393 2 960 A 64.44 .0173996 16.70 .00 31,11
01-05-84 026433 3,73 1061 C 70.67 .0015740 1.67 .00 72..;4
12-0.3-83 025372 32 711 A 49.46 .1)022968 1.61- .0+) 7,S5
11-01-87 024661 29 761 A 55.53 $5.53
10-03-83 023900 30 1572 A 77.05 77.E?;
09-03-83 022328 32 '246 A 109,16 109.16
08-02-83 020092 26 1773 C 86.'28 86.28
07-07-83 018309 34 1620 C 80.35 60.,:,5
NXT PRMT NXT MTR,
WECTRL PRINT SCR WINDOW=B SCREEN=O
PH C I S B I L L I N H I S T O R NO ORDERS
ACCT 00-000-133-0144-1-02 NAME ~TEST 000000 TEST,RSN
'ERA RTE W1 MTR-NBR 00023198 7 ST 04 MUN-TX
WTR 11' 4 CYCLE .02
RDG-DTE MTR--RDO DYS CONSLMP 8 USAGE-REV SEWAGE SOL/WST TAX MTR-BILL
1' •30-S4 000556 29 112+)0 A 20.59 19.36 7.73 .00 47.63
!1-84 000444 30 11600 A 21.9.1 19.77, 8.00 . +)0 49.66
101-1?2-84 rjOG308 29 22500 A 34.37 18.41 6. y0 .00 59.08
:+9-.}4-84 000 +83 77, 26100 C 39.83 21.70) 1.43 .00 68.96
Oa-,)2 -84 015446 1 27800 A 42.67 20. 38 6.9x3 .1)v 70. Q;
07-02-84 015168 28 8300 A 43.64 20.83 b.30 .00 70.77
06-04-64 014a85 :3 Z 0600 C 30.15 21.33 7.43 .00 58.'71
-:,5-•-:12-84 014689 28 17:uO A 21.26 20.83 6. .00 48.. r
;4-""i-d4 )14.;', 846 :0 1:x:+)0 A 21.41 22.4) 6, 75 S6. 15a
- -'''-3-64 (114424 28 1 1400 A 19.30 L 15 5.: f) 45.. :
2-46-134 :143x!6 13600 A 20.06 14.53 ?.2Cr 41.r
1-: 15-84 1)1 i 1 70 12'!u0 C 19. 2 14.04 T, i.3 . 1:10) 4-.1, n
1 --'1 1 -t'37 014+:+4 l 1rl0 A 16.031 11.7a
1
k : 9 :,3 n'? 1C.,200 A 15.59 11.14 6.57,
1: )'9 t,1
1-1
836 30 :9800 A 39.97 11.25 6.16
01 "x548 32 21800 A •_0.15 11.44 o.57
+:,8 -a 3, U 1 3:36 26 22000 C 30.59 10.04 5. 111 Y.a
07-t:>7-83 013,110 34 19600 C 27.59 11.65 f 4a 46.
NXT =P;Ir IIXT M-K
WSCTRL PRINT '3E:n kt1rIDOW~E 9r~REEi
old
over
total last
avq annual year
Example I bill charges actual
Actual Billing for 11/83-11/84 $162.20 419947.33
Present Method Average Bill for 12/135-12186 $163.41 $2,224,82 14%
Revised Method Average Dill for 12/85-12/86 $176.83 $29!23,!6 9X
1a° • 'r r''f v " r*cr~ ,f~+'.ub y r'_r+~'r •iJ ~f~"' fAy "w~Y'rr f x J~„ i i Si r S i t t r: J
C f . 5 B I L L Lr N,. Q I{ I. , T: d' R Y +~+►+7 NO • CRDE#.R$
ACdT ' ~-000-250-01165 4-01 TEST 000000 TEST RSN
SOV RTE A2 MTR-NBR 00019815 1 8T 03 MUN-TX
ELE MTR 3 CYCLES 04
ROG-DTE MTR-RDG DYS CONSUMP 8 USAGE-REV FUEL-FAC FUEL-AMT TAX MTR-BILL
x"•06-S4 024352 30 348 A 33.33 .0225000 12.33 .00 45.68
06--84 023804 33 343 C 41.85 .0125126 6.60 .0x) 48.65
10-04-84 023261 28 877 A 62.99 .0118787 10.42 .00 73.41
:)9•-1:,6-84 022384 29 1729 A 118.58 .0055295 9.55 Qlip 128.14
43-Q8-84 024635 30 1741 A 119.;38 .0043023 7.49 .0:Q 127.1)7
07-09-94 018914 31 1020 A 124.92 .0004738 .87 125. 79
i6-•U8-84 017094 2 746 A 55.33 .00.30703 3.0•} , :rq 5S. .7
-07-84 016:••}8 31 551 xl 40.42 .00+)2386 .10- .x:0 •3x5.:
1:4 -06-84 015795 233 554 #1 '7.82 .ootig0a .67 .00 40.4
x) ~-C•9-84 ra 152 1 3x5 6zo A 45.41. .0109909 7. 14 . x?q ~i2. r r
2-r)c3-x34 +14581 29 725 A 4Y. YO .0173996 12.b1 .00 62. -:1
01-10••84 01':3356 -4 69;, I 50. 92 . x)015740 1.41 . 62.::
12•-x):,-93 O1;4x'51 :9 13 44.07 .002'1963
1.~4 ,x50 42.4
I1--x)8--8• x)1232? 688 C 50.94 3G.`7}
10-•06-83 x:xll';41 27 114 C 53.96 •35.'7.5
:iy-x59-8:5 01 Cx51 7 5 6(:1 C 1 14.91 1 1.1.41
x58-xx5-83 ,)0814, i:5 13.`3 G 33.46 3A.
006;.,:;4 :2. 173.7 A 85.50
NXT FAMT NXT Mph
WSCTRL FFINr scFE WINDOWsS SCREEN=0
CH C I 5 a[ L L 1 N 0 H I S T O R Y NO ORDERS
Acc T ru mE TEST 000400 TEST RSN
:-E:RV RTE W1 MTR-NBR 00010437 6 6T 04 MUN-TX
WTR MTR 4 C /t;',.E 04
FDG-DTE MTR-RDG DYS -_-Qt :•U[^.P D USAGE-REV SEWAGE SOL/WST TAX MTR--BILL
l: 6-84 010065 2?:)0 A 8.71 7.26 8.043 .i::x -`:.97
:'e-94 :~+9579 :'600 C 9.35 8.59 8.80 :t;p, 74
v•i-84 00774:5 .3
16:x)0 f+ 25.15 7.41 6..30 .00 i3. 36
:W97SO 29 7700 A 14.11 7.67 S• 33 . 1:0
3 Ji3 34 x 30973 : 1x5 171+)C► A 26.48 7. 9 6. 75 , r}Q y 1 ,
! •:''i 84 OCxSS 7,1 1:1:Q1) n 21.94 8. 15 6.98 . ) : 7.: i
t - r}~-134 009; ?7 2 6603 x A 13. 11 8. 23 W :x x. ;il S6
57-A4 1:O1?7,71 31 •}'?,•,!i A Ix).76 8.15
r
S-',3 4 :0'723:3 ^3 1 7n 7 1) 7.48 6. 77 A _
. J._.~ !Il'9^c1J 8..CJ4 . •i:C
.J ,J . •1
. •'l•1CI rt3.} ;IIx~Li r, .}.Y :IIJ r'f • 8.27 6. 44./ 5. ~i •'I1.' t• r'.1 1 Q..E3.1 13,:0 a 1),.C E3. J2 tl . ~JU
~ • .7 : .
l 00 A 5.45 :181 : l`.
[ . r,:,',1 1 7 l G'a fi 8.58 a . [ 6 . ,c 5 : ,
li; -x:6-?: •10'7fri'3 :.i 1.i4v1) C 19.27 5. io
?-,)9-g.7 3?44 5 1740+:, C 25+.x)2? 6. 5t, 1. `Sti.
Oj-0 5-83 :'1)5770 25 14400 C 20. 3'7 5.16 7- 1 1 - -0:) (It:19621 32 1 1500 A 17.62 6. 06 4.1o
. ,'.:.1
Nxr FRfIr tl;,T ,OF
W3C1FNL FPINT are :,1[I'IGJW~2 ~'_F:[:x:ilax:r
over
total last
avg annual year
Example II bill charges actual
Actual Billing for 11/83-11/84 $101.91 11,222.89
Present Method Average Bill for 12/83-17/86 sli6o01 *L0 392.12 14%
Revised Method Average Bill for 112/85-12/06 s109a78 11,317.3b 8Y.
aC~ t~~'~`1FS a b. ~.'kY ! x~"sl'~ ~ '~r4llrc c:t - las n *„r! r
Yk~ - ~ ! ! r,~ 1, '~r~r ~ ~ " A, ! "6 ~r`~lix~'a Y4 1,~1 k r " c S,rM . ! t`' 1.,.~y+~ ' 1 ~Li
44
AdCT 00-000-^129-0398-2-01 NAME TEST OOd OQ `TEST ARSN
V RTE R2' MTR-NOR 00009549 2 5T 03 MU4-TX
SON LE MTR s CYCLE 03
ADO-DTE MTR-RDO DYS CONSUMP 8 USAGE-REV FUEL-RAC FUEL-AMT TAX MTR-BILL
" ')5-84 005357 30 866 A 48.93 .0225000 19,49 .00 68.42
j5-84 004491 31 685 A 50.39 .0125126 8.57 400 59,16
t0-05-84 003806 29 1261 A 88.16 .')118787 14.98 .4:10 105,14
09-06-84 002545 31 2209 A 150.21 .0055295 12.21 .O2" 162.42
08-1:16-84 000336 32 2288 A 155.56 .0043023 7.84 .047 , r
165.1}
!'7.05-84 008048 30 2041 A 139.011 .4004788 .93
!i6-05-84 000)07 959 A 67.87 .1)1)4071:18 a:
1.)5-04-34 005068 3:1 718 A 49.97 .001)218'3 . 14- 4 7, L,.T
04-04-84 0043520 27 742 C 47.89 .0011908 .134 .OG 46.7.3
03-08-84 00'3648 30 812 A 53.13 .010991)9 8. r2
02-07-84 002036 28 851 A 57.00 .0172"996 14.131 .00 11.1-11
()1-10-84 001985 36 1078 C 72.:5 .1)015740 t. 70 .5
l:.-1:15-8;1 0x:u;,907 t2 837 A 60.15 .00'.12960
11-03-83 000018 29 789 A 57.07
11)-05-83 409229 28 1621 A 78.64
U 7-4) 7-83 0076 18 3 3 2453 C 110.94 1 11:. ? 4
06-1:05•-83 005155 233 21:1113 A Y7.83
07-08-83 0t+3140 30 1634 A 80.41 U,;,, 14I
NXT FKMT :ixr Parr;
WSCTRL PRINT OCR WINDOW=B SCRELNt 1)
BN C I 5 B I L L I N 0 H I 5 T 0 R Y 4** NO l kriEpiy
ACCT 00-000-129-1)398-2-02 NealE TE3T 1)!",s.; ;.1j m3T ristd
:F(V~~ ' RTE W1 MTR-NOR 000.11:17A3 6 £T rj4 NUN,- Tx
WTR MFR 4 G (.LE 03
RDO-DTE MTR-RDG DY3 CONSUMP 5 USkOE-REV SEWAGE c0L/4)5T TAX MTR-BILL
12-)5-84 021 L 901 30 bZl?0 to 1:3.4 9 12.11 6.01;t ~0
15-94 021839 31 7104) A 13.62 11.7'7 :3.27 .1:10 61'3
.-:)3-84 021768 29 16300 A ::i. 36 1 1 .0'2 8. 3, ,till { : , l I
0'9-1)b-84 021608 1 1:£170 A ~2.3a 11.79 8.78
<a g-176-54 021465
Z4 2 ::!340 $4 31).95 1:+:. 1? _'4 .1:4 '17. .
07---11-94 021133 0 X511}!' A -8.41 11.17 -15
5-d4 0Z088 4 :.2 X2 41?I) A 970* 12.17 7. •)i) :4
t7 r-I r,} 84 172 ; b6~1 :1) 671."11
Ilt}-L1,; •u~14 li wl-1 J y! '5 til 111 C
11 . 49 1 I. v7 09 v:-I:Id-e4 1}~17r.'4 .1 ,:':,1.'J R 12 I1 `a2 11'.
-:7-S4 I:~i1.}"Y a 55:11:1 A 17. I4 7.:13
.4 1:121:!•;i : i,2" 11.5. 7 : 1
1'.. -1:'3-3: :1: tl l 1. 1~ .i. ~r_ .
111-•1'.'J •'d: 01,1 ~d :.Ij.;111,3 ^ 42.Q-1 U. 4. . .
,:19-u7•-3.- 1.1I?Y26 r 'Z7.6 Q0 u 77 9.9: i t.?.
Iflp--:~`.i "r3: 17176`8 E3 i3 .."q':,%) A 16. -1.-. i;. 41 -
14.59 50 4 :1f•1 4 " J - -
w,icrr, L Fri IN, 'SC4; Il.l ;;.r._,_•,over
total last
evg annual year
Emample III bill charges actual
Actual Billing for 11/83-11/84 $129.55 $Ij 554,61
Present Method Average sill for 12/83-12/86 $162.75 lrl4953.0ri 26%
Revised Method Average Bill for 12/85-12/86 *151.09 Slo el3,08 17%
t~ ~ t +
, y ! ~ l ~ Yy 41 ~ F 1 f E r it • <
INT. t$ f t, L i `N 4 H 5 0 FjQ"ORIiSII~
_331, ' Z,-61 NAME rEBt OO0000 YFaT RW
S"V RTt R2 M7R-NBR 00020647 l ST 03 m*-*x
ELE MW O CYCU 02
RDO-DYE MTR-RDG DYS CGNSUMR B USAGE-REV FUEL-FAC FUEL-AMT TAX MTR-BILL
6-134 022214 29-- 2138 A 106.08 ,0228000 48.83 .40 154.60
1-84 020056 3 i ' 1:177"'A 95.85 .0126126 17.23 .00 113.08
10-01-34 018679 31„ 1804 A 123.88 .0118787 21.4.3 .00 145.31
06-11-84 +:116875 30 2240 A 1`.52.01 .0055295 12.39 .00 164.40
09-)1-24 01.1635 30 X062 A 140.44 .0043023 8.07 .00 149.31
Q7 -r7a-34 Q112573 *2 7 1668 C; 114.19 .0004788 .84) . 00 i14.97
05 -1l -8.1 to 14?1,15 1 °3',17 C 93.64 • 00+107+)8 3.74 1!14. 38
446 tl 1+14'9 A 92.38 .0+:102188 .J11
0 O, ~ 2 7 3' . .8
a 34 +3tir 4 7 28 201.4 A 1 _1 . 4. .oo 119Em 2. 'W
1~:,.82
-48-34 3,136038 31 27133 A 144.35 .Q1 .19909 710.59 .60 193.44
°1?3-33 007,250 '29 7598 A '.2 08.54 .0173996 62.60 Q0
:.71.11
2 '1 o 266. 727 .0715740 7.29 . f7t7 4.0?
"1 1:7 65 )0Q216
. Y
L -}t'-y3 ,772:'7
8... 7 Z
l0 0 a-8 r 91';.3•~'96 ~i 1 1.h 71 a 91 . b 3 81 .63
i 63125 2 Z41" } :a 116. 31
16.51
•:137521. 27 !f_ 3'1 C• 3317. VS GO.4
r~7-0n-8.i +3.58;7 31644 c 61.•;2
0-1.Z2
MXT FRMT MAY MTR
ws: C1F,t. Fril~JC UCFi WINDU'rlu6 SCREEN=0
F''4 1 6 N I L L 1 N 6 It 1 .3 T 0 R Y +►+r s NO CRUEkS
().:Cr
0001>+10 TEST RSN
RS N
SEriV R r E Wl MTR-PJ8R x!0+,10,717"3 8 5 r 04 MUN=Tit
W':t r3 T R 4 CYCLE 02
k G-L11 E "TF.•-F. DG VYS L.r,l' rir V L9AGE-REV ;SEt°iAt t 5ULi1,JST TAX m TR-t', 1LL
1 t 1 h ? I L!5. 12
. 17; 72 7.73 6:+ . 1 L'' ! i':' 1 l t3: 15.46 Es. 27
1-34 013375 :t l2~ 1 2V.:3 15.46 6.178 42,.6
• .1:117 d.
3-_ t-'.~4 1 1:1.1;•2 ! 1~,.,,,,,7 r7 2 x.05 14.96 b./5
•s7 ,
i . >32 1.02 14.16 6.15
4 16. 15. 11-7 3 r ,
O•l. . N 1, :'.'t. :v~.'.- i 1. 76 l J. ! 7 1, t ,.ail '.1 ~y•
5. Ld 4z
3. 44
L . Y.
..f7 ~ss~i SJ.:'.
t'! t ll;ll ~%j
.757 _2 114:l t~ l.':7 1?. :+.3
over
total last
avq Annual year
Example V bill charyos actual
Actual billing for 11/83-11/84 $196.70 $21360.35
Present Method Average Bill for 12/85-12/86 0239.18 1x29870.16 22}:
RMVlsed Method Average Bill for 12/85-12/86 $226.86 $24722.32 15'/.
d'w~,fl 1p I, t t t T w 7' r, 1.r r, 2 ,
+ +~..i aar 1 4i^ s a . A( ,i 'r 4 .if "I P: ✓ir rJ -..y
119E C1 9 L I YN G H I 7 0 R Ya OR 1 G''
NO' QEf~B4*
wtv ~0_-090 171 02.:2-1791 RTE R2 MT.. TEST 000000 T46T RS
4[RV
r - NOR 00011738 1 4Y 03 MUN~Tx
ELB MTR 5 CYCLE 02
5'00-DTE MTR-RDG DYS CONSUMP B USAGE-REV FUEL-FAC FUEL-AMT TAX MTR-BILL
1-84 048977 31 628 A 37.45 ,0225000 14.13 000 51158
11 2-84 048349 35 726 C 54.45 o OI25126 9.08 .00 63.53
09-28-84 047623 28 1576 A 108.42 .0118787 19.72 .00 127.14
08-31-84 046047 31 2277 A 154.63 .0053295 12.59 .00• 167,22
07-:31-84 043770 29 1658 A 126.97 .0041023 7.'';9 ,()0 1'34.16
07-02-a4 041912 10 1697 A 116.29 -0004788 .81 .1)0 111.10
06-•04-84 040215 : 971 C 65. 93 .04)4070a 3.56 , lil) a7, 47
05-02-(14 49T40 0 331 A
26..:8 .01)02188 .~}0 ^6.'2
46-
04-0-4-84 07,9009 31 400 A 'x).62 .001191)8 448 .40
03-0^c-94 0ak3b09 ^c9 700 A 29.00 .0109.9019 4.18 .40
02-02-84 038229 29 423 A 31.76 .0173996 7.3 6 .00
01-03-84 C.'78C16 '4 S39 C 39.60 .01:115740 .85 .00) _ 40.45
12-01y-F3'+ 0:;7267 .31 4 8 A .2.94 .4(:1229613 .'78- .0V )1.'l2
11-01-RZ 1)336829 32 594 A 45.35 45.:5
,)I~.. j01-H3 07:6234 2 19 1234 A 62.45 62.45
G9-::+2-~]3 034981 31 2265 f1 109.90 10,7. 16
08'.42-83 032716 27 17,51 C 35.87 x'5.37
07-06-83 070'955 34 1692 0 (33.70 a3. 7')
NXT FRMT NXT lrii
W5CT'RL FRINT SLR WINDOWAB SCRE_Ns0
6H C I 5 B I L L I N U H 1 3 T 0 R Y NO ORDE!iS
ACCT 0:+4-01:0-121-':2:2-1-0:' ~,1iPfQ suffimmmo TEST 0000)0 rCs T RSN
SERV RTE wi MIR-NBR 000121186 7 5T 04 "IUN-rx
WTR MTR 4 CYCLE r)2
'RC't;-ATE MR-RC-0 Gr'S CCN!• LJF' O u9,1GE-"REV SEWAGE SOL/WST TAX MTR-DILL
5-34 421: 24). 0:12 113.68 8. 27 . Cn? 46.: r
34 0!Q
71 14:.") L 54 17.27 9. a3 So. , 4
H-d-l 6. G .00
71 v!•I l;i r•~ ~I1.1. J1 11.31' r,. 98
7 'I -c'4 1:"! 17. 45 .:'7 7'r. i9
}:%.9t l4. ?1 i.33 .1'0 S3. 7S
1.1%'•f'1 ";34 001'_ .•J .:9 :1 •1 i.. hF3 11.1:11) :I) . :':f S'
a 14 1:/:' r1 :.111 kr «I) i.: J 'It -24
l 5. 4.
14. 42 •111', + 't
01 ) ra 42.47 Gi 1. ?io:'3l : k 278:1': F1 3. 1:f l l.'
t
7.'7
v;.:c , 1vx~• I:<,1r :7155
I'ri'.. i','1i',•i
over
total last
avg annual year
Example IV bill charges actual
Actual Billing for 11/83-•11/84 $125.41 310504.97
Present Method Average Bill for 12/85-12/86 15154.14 X11849,68 23%
Revised Method Average Bill for 12/85-'12/86 *138m00 $19656.00 10Y.
Ni:a ~ "`ors K '~Fv~s'" ~rfi TCfCr~'d',z^y a_'._'rsF rY• :•ti, i~ ~~p wd^s f,i•„x~1 "a
Public Utiltt s Board Minutes
FFebruary 6,
Page
The Board looked at each of the proposed agenda items
asking questions about item i2 regi ,ling utility
maintenance projects from growth related p:.ajects. Staff
suggested it probably relater to the format of the capital
improvements plan. The Board was concerned aj,,out item t3
in the agenda, zoning and the effect of zoning as it
relates to utilities development and policies.
The Board took no other action on this itemi no action was
necessary.
15. CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER it HOGAN RAZOR ON THE DESIGN PHASE OF
TU A SE~' R CE pU T N F CIO TIES 0 SEk T
ELEVXTION OF THE NORTHWEST DENTON AREA
Ham informed the Board that the change order was due to the
periodic overflow of the McKenna Park tank, which causes
erosion on the hill side of the adjacent park and creates
both an unsitely appearance and. somewhat unsafe
conditions. The change order is necessary due to the
overflow problem, which did not create a particular problem
to utilities but for Parke and Recreation who has requested
that a means of channeling the water out of the park
instead of creating the erosion be added to the project.
• The Board requested additional information provided by Ham
again stating it was the run-off pipe that was not included
in the original specifications because it had not been a
problem to utilities, and Parks and Recreation had just
recently informed utilties of the problem.
Boyd made a motion to approve the change order and to
recommend it to City Council for approval. Second by
Thompson. Three "ayes," no "nays". Motion carried.
16. CONSIDER REVISION OF ORDINANCE _ SECTION 26-6.1 AVERAGE
BILLING FOR SERVICE
Cryan presented this item, stating that the minor changes
were necessary to correct technical items to improve
administration of average billing, The change would also
allow for financial hardships to obtain average billing
ever though they may not have a 12 month history of prompt
paymentu, Boyd made a motion to approve the revision of
the ordinance and to recommend it to City Council for
approval. Second by Thompson. Three "ayes," no "nays".
Motion carried.
. r c ,F ,r .r F.,.9 R', l I ♦ Cb v' _ 3J~ Jd n - 1 F". p p .9•u
11 4 1 ~^Y l°
'Apr 11 16;' 196 '
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: G, Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider prop-)sed Oversize Agreement with Ridgeway Plaza Joint
Venture for a new water line on Lillian B. Miller Freeway along
the frontage of their property.
REC0,4MENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of March 27, 19859
recommended to the City Council approval of this Oversize
Agreement due to water demand; imposed by this and other
developments in this area in the near future.
SUMMARY
Due to increased demands in this area !or water, oversizing of
this water line is needed. It complies with the Hogan and
Rasor Water Transmission Study.
BACKGROUND
Ridgeway Plaza Joint Venture is considering the development of
commercial facilities adjacent to I-35E and Lillian B. Miller
reeway,
The developers have been informed that the, City of Denton
requires a 27" diameter water line on Lillian B. Miller Freeway
along the froe.!age of their property and wishes to participate
in the costs of ~L:is line with an Oversize Agreement. The new
water line is necessary to provide services to new developments
in this area.
This Oversize Agreement was previously approved uy the Board
and subsequently the City Council on January 8, 1980, under the
prior developer's name of Gary G. Crupper dba Crupper
Enterprises, Inc. Since the property has changed ownership, a
new review of the request is required.
PAOGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Municipal Utilities, Public Utilities Board, City
Council, City Engineer, Developers and Contractors,
3602U:1
A i ',R l
FISCAL IMPACT
Total Estimated Cost of Line
(415 LF I $57.50/LF) $239862.50
Estimated Cost to Ridgeway Plaza
Joint Venture
(415 LF ® $21.50/1,F) $._80922.50
Estimated Cost to City of Denton
(415 LF C $36.00/1,F) $14,940.00
Source of Funds: Acct. 1623-008-0461-9138-7921
Prepared by: Respectfully sub itted,
David Ham
Asst. Director of Utilities its a t g
Water/Wastewater Divisions City Manager
Approved:
a r
K~ t1s a son _
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Location Map
11 Hogan and Rasor Study Map
III Water Line Oversize Participation Agreement (draft)
IV Resolution
V Minutes PUB meeting of 3/27/85
I
3602U:2
y,,,, J» ,~"a., a ? p,f Y. iry ~ ° ° Y y•F n t ,rr c s.3' !s ``fns
.I.y~ r P-~ A Y h'. A yu`e.. .{k° ~ A~ T n l Y I° ! ♦ R.. f
♦ r. „
il/tal v ititt IT lie
%3 MIN"
• • w
Im
4
b
y •
~ e 1
o ~
• ( r I I'
t 1 '
r
C7 ®1
1 + • le
• r
e r r r J 1 r
y
\x
C1L
1 1 ti
1
r • ~ `
r 1 N
a t ~ • a
~ ..rv 1
\
a
P r
~~qf
r ~ \
I a
f ~mq
a, 1 ~ r rr ~ r 1
1 a
.
r r
• r
CITY YOF
DENTON,TEXAS
'~01 ALTERNATE W 3
~ lA~R'Ak NOV I<.ean COMPUTER tax MAP
r erlrawwrwr HC 2AN a KAG"p w
~ 0
• tows Iwm wi irn+
tir
J
FktiiBiT r
x, i i 1 t :,,a e
, 105?L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE C:.TY'S PARTICIPATION IN
THE COST OF INSTALLING OVERSIZE WATERLINE FACILITIES; AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT; APPROVIIG THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING. FOR AN EFFECTIIE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Denton wishes to erter Into an agree-
ment to participate in the cost of providing oversized waterline
facilities which is In the beat interests sf the City; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 ;f) .,f the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council all ex,tanditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 o3 the City Charter requires every act
of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the
contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTOF HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby approves the "Waterline Oversize
Participation Agreement, attached hereto, between the City and Sam
Kartalis, Ventura Manager, d/b/a Ridgeway Plaza Joint Venture to
provide for the city's participation :n the cost of providing
oversized waterline facilities in accordance with said agreement
and the Mayor to hereby authorized to execute the agreement on
behalf of the City.
SECTION It.
That the City Council authorize the expenditure of funds in
the manner and amount as specified in the agreement.
SECTION 111.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1985.
RLCHW 0- STLWARTt MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CHARLOTTE ALLEN C1 ~L$.KLTARY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
DEBRA ADAHI DkAYOVITCR, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
a i s 'r. rp ,n .y
p.
THE STATE OF TEXAS § WATER LINE. OVERSIZE
AGREEMENT
COUNTY OF DENTON 4 BETWEEN THE-CITYUAND
SAM KARTALIS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, WHEREAS, Sam Kartalis,
Venture Manager, d/b/a RIDGEWAY PLAZA JOINT VENTURE, 8235 Douglas,
Suite 816, Dallas, Texas, 75225, is the Developer of certain
Property shown on the attached map, which map is incorporated
herein as if set forth in full, in the City of Denton, Denton
County, Texas, and further described as property on the West side
of I-35E between Conway and Lillian B. Miller Freewayy and
Developer desires to serve such property with 415 feet of ofl site
and on site water line facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires that such on and off site
water facilities be oversized and the City will participate in the
additional cost of the oversized facilities pursuant to the
provisions of the Denton Development Code, Apppendix A to the Code
of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, N0&1 THEREFORE,
This Agreement, made this day of , L9851
by and between Sam Kartalia, Venture Managers d/b/a RIDGMAY PLAZA
JOINT VENTURE, Dallas, Texas, hereinafter called "Developer", and
the City of Denton, Texas, a Home Rule municipal Corporation of
the State of Texas, hereinafter called "City";
WITNESSETH:
1. The Developer will install, by contract or otherwise, a 27"
water line and necessary appurtenances to serve the propert;P
described on the attached map in accordance with all City of
Denton ordinances, rules, re ulations, policies and procedures.
The said facilities shall be located as shown on the attached map
which is made a part hereof for all intents and purposes.
2. The City's share of the estimated cost of said factities is
$14,940 • ($57.50-$21.50) x 415 L.F. Upon completion of construc-
tion and acceptance by the City of said facilities, the actual
cost of the City's participation in said facilities shall be
determined and certified to by the Director of Utilities, and his
certificate setting out the City's actual cost of said facilities
shall be attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. The City shall pay for its share of the facilities within
thirty (30) days from the date of acceptance of the facilities, or
under such terms and conditions that are mutually acceptable to
the parties.
4. Title to said facilities is hereby and shall at all times
be vested in the City.
S. The Developer shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and
hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability
of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third
person occasioned by any act or omission, neglect or wrong doing
of Developer, its officers, agents, employees, invitees
contractors or other persons with regard to the performance of
this contract, and Developer will, at its own cost and expense,
defend and protect against any and all such claims and demands.
6. If Developer does not begin construction of these
facilities wihin one calendar year (12 months) from data of this
sig-ked Agreement, this Agreement becomes null and void.
V DGEWAY PLAZA JOINT VENTURE/PAGE 1
+ '1 F yf 1 '1 e , . ,ro
r
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed this day
of , 1985.
RIDGEWAY PLAZA JOINT VENTURE
BY:
SAM KARTALIS,-VEFTUKE-jqMGM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
RICHARD 0. STEWART-sKAYOR
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY-TECKETARY
CITY OF DENTON,bTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: A
RIDGEWAY PLAZA JOINT VENTURE/PAGE 2
.y: r ~ t A♦ sh an A~C`+, n'4"r r5 r i a fiu' 7ti-r u p `r ✓ i # ,:{;,o.
~ ',i r a. t • r° . a, ~+ti i' hC M f` r e cr 3 r i .
PUB MINU ES
6, CONSIDER RESOLUTION EXPRESSING DENTON' S INTENT TO ENTER INTO A
,
This item was presented by Nelson. Laney raise a concern
regarding Argyle s outstanding debt. Thompson also raised the
concern regarding the resolution if the legal issue of whether
AWSC can "dedicate" their water lines to Denton, after
annexation by Denton, without Denton paying is not resolved.
Nelson indicated that the problem had been looked into by AWSC,
and that there appeared to be no problems with the legal issues
involved in this agreement. Nelson agreed to have the City
Attorney look at the agreement again.
Thompson made a motion to recommend to the City Council
acceptance of the agreement provided legal issues are
resolved. Second by Herring. Motion carried unanimously.
7, CONSIDER PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF WATER FROM THE CITY
0 DALLAS. Nelson presented the proposal. The oar a no
o ect ons with the proposal as outlined. The Board agreed to
review the proposal again at their next meeting and make an
appropriate recommendation at that time,
8. CONSIDER PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR SALE OF WATER TO THE CITY OF
CORINTR a son presented ►e proposal an suggested the
proposal' become effective tentatively in June 1956. Nelson
further requested approval conti.agent upon City Attorney
approval. Coomes made a motion to recommend to the City
Council approval of the proposed contract. Second by Herring.
Motion carried.
9. CONSIDER ENGINEERS' BROCHURES AND INFORMATION FOR DEVELOPMENT
MANAGMENT STUDY F5R DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES: Laney
requests written reports from the various compan es. Nelson
recommended that two management consulting firms'
representatives make formal presentations at the April
meeting. Herring confirmed the suggestion and further
recommended Theodore Barry Associates and Touche Ross. In
addition, Herring suggested that a sub committee make out a
list of gjestions for the companies, Laney suggested that
these representatives be present at our next regular meeting,
April 240 1985. Volunteers for the sub-committee are Laney,
Coomes, and Herring.
10, CONSIDER PROPOSED OVERSIZE AGREEMENT WITH RIDGEWAY JOINT
H FRONTAGE OF THEIR PROPERTY: Has reviewed this agreement
Indicating a everyc ng remained the same except the parties
to the contract, Herring made a motion to recommend to the
City Council acceptance of the agreement with the new owners,
Second by Thompson. Motion carried.
11, CONSIDER EVALUATION OF BID NO..9406 ELECTRIC METER TEST BOARD:
u os rev ewe the recommen e C oones Me a motion to
recommend to the City Council approval of the bid. Second by
Thompson, Motion carried.
-t
3
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, on Friday, Mai 10, 1985, Calhoun Jr. High PTA is
sponsoring an annual Day o the Cougar fundraising event, to be
held on Congress Street between the intersection of Alice Street
and Denton Street; and
WHEREAS, all abutting property owners of the street have
given their permission to the temporary closing of said street;
and
WHEREAS, the Day of the Cougar fundraising Event is open to
the general public of the City and County of Denton; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate apace for the said
fundraising event and in order to protect the safety of citizens
who attend, the City Council of the City of Denton deems it is
necessary to temporarily close a portion of Congress Street
between Alice Street and Denton Street from the hours of 3:00
P.M. until 7:00 P.M. on May 10, 1985; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I.
That Congress Street between Alice Street and Denton Street
shall be temporarily closed as a street or public thoroughfare
of any kind or character whatever on May 10, 185 from 3:00 P.M.
until 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of holding tb flay of the Cougar •
fundraising event.
1 SECTION It.
I That thu portion of the above described streets shall revert
back to th,s City for normal traffic activity immediately from
and after 7.00 P.M. on May 10, 1985.
k
SECTION Itl-
That this resolution shall take effect and be in full force
and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval.
I~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of April, 1985.
I .
RIEWD 0. l RXYO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
► ? ATTEST:
I
i CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMt DRAYOVtTCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONj TEXAS
BY.,
J
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BY
CITY OF DENTON INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUThORITY
TO ISSUE A BOND FOR
GLENN L. HULCHER
AND THE BOND RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR
THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BOND
WHEREAS, City of Denton industrial Development
Authority was created under the auspices of the City of
Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton (the
"City") has, by written resolution declared that certain
areas of the City be designated as blighted areas (the
"Blighted Area") pursuant to the Development Corporation Act
of 1979, as amended, Article 5190.6, V,A.T.C,S., and the
rules promulgated thereunder (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, Glenn L. Hulcher desires to finance, pursuant
to the Act, the construction of an office building
containing approximately 14,S00 square feet located at 611
Kimberly Drive in Denton, Texas (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Project is located within or adjacent to
the Blighted Area; and
WHEREAS, the general public had an opportunity to make
comments on the Project prior to the adoption of this
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable that this
Resolution be adopted.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DENTON THAT:
Section 1. The "Loan Agreement between City of Denton
Industrial Development Authority and Glenn L. Hulcher", in
substantially the form and substance as attached to this
Resolution and made a part hereof for all purposes, is
hereby approved, and the Bond in the principal amount of
;1,4.50,000, may be issued pursuant thereto for the purpose
of paying the cost of acquiring and constructing or causing
to be acquired and constructed the Project as defined and
described therein.
Section 2. The "Resolution Authorizing the issuance of
City of Denton Industrial Development Authority Bond, Series
1965 and the Execution of a Trust Inde.iture (Glenn L.
Hulcher Project)", in substantially the form and substance
+V7 t
attached to this Resolution and made a part hereof for all
purposes, is hereby specifically approved, and the Bond may
be issued as provided for therein.
Section 3. The City hereby approves the issuance of
the aforesaid Bond in the aggregate principal amount of
;1,15.0,000 for Glenn L. Hulcher, and further approves the
Project as described :.n the aforesaid Loan Agreement, and
such approvals shall be solely for the purposes of Section
103(k) of the internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and
the City shall have no liabilities for the payment of the
Bond nor shall any of its assets be pledged to the payment
of the Bond.
Section 4. The City hereby assigns to the City of
Denton industrial Development Authority its allocable
portion of the state private activity bond volume with
respect to the reservation request to be filed for the Bond
by the City of Denton Industrial Development Authority.
Cl
55 bd a r ^ e F ~ 4 F e'? A ,r ~ t~ '.N.k ` A 5
Apri1 16, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
e
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Resolution Expressing Denton's Intent to Enter
into a Water Sales Agreement with Argyle Water Supply
Corporation.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of March 27, 1985,
recommended to the City Council approval of the proposed
resolution,
SUMMARY
The Argyle Water Suppply Corporation (AWSC) serves retail water
to the City of Itrgyle and a large area of Denton's
extraterritorial jurisdictional (ETJ) area southwest of Denton
from Hickory Creek south to Argyle. AWSC and Denton have been
working under an informal agreement for several years that
ultimately AWSC would purchase wholesale water from Denton and
that, as Denton's city limits expanded to incorporate AWSC
customers, such customers would become Denton's customers as
they are annexed. AWSC has expressed it is their intent to
transfer ownership in their lines in the area to Denton at no
cost provided AWSC's loop line system integrity is maintained.
AWSC has an opportunity to participate in oversixing of a water
line along Highway 377 which could serve to supply wholesale
water from Denton to AWSC. However, prior to paying any pro
rata, AWSC wants some assurance that Denton will sell water to
AWSC. The attached resolution addresses Denton's intent to
sell wholesale water to AWSC on a similar contractural basis as
Denton sells to the City of Corinth and as Dallas sells to its
treated water customer cities.
A water sales contract would generally follow the same
"principles" as proposed for the new contract beti,een Denton
and Corinth. (see Exhibit I.)
Prior to entering into such a sales agreement, AWSC will need
to comply with the City of Dallas' new customer service policy
since any water Denton would sell to AWSC would be purchased
from Dallas. The major item in Dallas' new customer service
policy (which is in the final draft stages of development) is
that a certain percentage (estimated SOt ) of AWSC's water
customers would have to be connected to a central. sewage
collection system, 'there resently is not a sewage collection
system in Argyle or the AWSV s service area.
3b02U:3
H
d M1 ~"ti: i~ s f.. rX, ~ „yip t l~^ Nw v
~'i°
'fl 9 K. h t
1
PROGRAMS, - DEPARTMENTS, GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Municipal Utilities, City of Argyle, Denton/Argyle
Service Area Customers, Legal Department, City of Dallas.
FISCAL IMPACT
Rates could possibly be based on a methodology similar to the
City of Dallas, wherein Dallas receives a rate of return on the
investment equal to their average bond rate plus 1.51 to cover
Dallas' overhead.
Prepared by. Respectfully submitted,
R.E. Nelson •
Director of Utilities
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Appr ved:
K, Ii. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Principles of Contract-Wholesale Treated Water
II Proposed Resolution
III Minutes PUB Meeting of 3/27/85
i
I
3602U:4
h ~ r h ~ . r .'i ° r ~K`w r o o r fi" - V 4 E C r1~~~ y n ~!AY l 14 ~ w 9r~li'rl
9
5
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS the Argyle Water Supply Corporation (AVSC) provides
water rervice to the City' of Argyle and surrounding areas
including certain areas in the City of Denton's extraterritorial
jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, AVSC has worked cooperatively with the City of Denton
co install lines in Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction in
accordance with Denton's standards in anticipation of Denton
eventually acquiring such facilities upon annexation of such
extraterritorial jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, AWSC obtains their water supply from Valle and
recogaises the long-term necessity to obtain a surface water
supply; and
WHEREAS, AVSC has a read tv participate in oversising a
waterline for approximately 1400001 aloe`i l.Lghway 97? from the
Santa lh Railroad -,>uth past $rush Creek `toad, all in conjunctiva
with the Jo Storer Honest Inc., development; and
WHEREAS, AWSC has requested assurance of Denton's intent to
sell treated water to AWSC upon completion of such line and upon
meeting other certain criteria as outlined in Exhibit I attached
herewitL; and
WHEREAS AWSC's intent is to transfer ownership at no cost to
the city 01 any AWSC lines located in Denton's extraterritorial
Jurisdiction at the time Denton annexes such area(s) provided
AVSC's loop line system integrity is maintained; NOW, THERElORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of DENTONi
The City of Denton hereby expressos Denton's intent to enj -
into a contract with the Argyle taster Supply Corporation (AWSC)
sell treated water upon completion of an appropriate waterline to
the AWSC certificated treat such line to be extended by development
interests or AWSC, and upon AWSC's meeting certain service criteria
as outlined in Exhibit i attached hereto sad/or the Dallas Water
Utilities New Customer Service Policy. Terns of such contract
Shall follow the principles outlined in Exhibit I.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1983.
RICHARD Oj I
, MAYOR
CITY Ot DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY Or DENTON,tTLW
APPROVED AS TO LR"L 10Pl1:
Dt1RA ADAM WAYOVI'M.B, CITY ATTORNtY
CITY Of DENTON, Tam
!Y 3 'wv+ _ _
f
4 kP ire d . n ;+i f „ PRINCIPLES OF CONTRACT
DENTONi WHOLESALE TREATED WATER
1. RATES
A. Two par;- based on a volume component which shall
primarily cover variable costs and a demand component
which shall primarily cover Ixed costs.
II. RATE METHODOLOGY
A. Revenue Requirement
1. Determined on utility basis at original cost
B. Rate of Return
1. Embedded rate of nterest on water obligations
plus 1.51
C. Rate Base
1. Plant InvestmentO
a. Raw water pump station
b. Raw water transmission lines
c. Water plant
d. S01 plant ground storage
e. water transmission lanes include all lines
over 8"
2. Depreciation
a. Based on standard utility accounting
practices.
3. Construction work in progress
a. To be included in rate base.
41 Capacity Allocations
as Allocated based on recognition of current
and future use.
D, Raw water costs
11 Purchased from Dallas at Dallas' raw water rates.
E. Expenses
Actual expenses incurred for operation,
maintenance, accounting, administration, return
on investment and other General Fund cost
reimbursementse
soalu:
~r r yy
ors£ Y ry `Y r47
w .1' 4 ( I.. Y ; 'Y ♦ .i'F +I 1' w % $[Ii. SERVICE CONDITIONS
A. Based generally on Dallas' "Service Conditions for
Treated Water Customers".
B. Water and wastewater plan required.
C. Subject to availability of water from Dallas.
D. Resale of water subject to Denton and Dallas' approval.
E. Land use development control in effect.
F. Temporary excess transmission capacity available for
system transportations use with reimbursement
available to Corinth.
G, Water distribution loss reduction program.
H. Conservation plan and practices.
IV. OTHER CONDITIONS'
A, Minimum ground and elevated storage required.
B. No interconnections from other services into the
System,
C. Wastewater collection system required with only
minimal percent of water customers on system allowed
to use septic tanks.
D. Percent of water sales must be returned to araa
surface water supplies after appropriate treatment.
E. Rate of flow controller required and set at scheduled
demand charge based on scheduled water requirements.
F. Rates changed annually based on annual water
requirements schedule.
G. Water requirements schedule adjustable annually on
approximately Jura 1.
J t i, ti'. Yl F yr,a l L - l•. .Y ! YS 6••~ i t:+ rR{ A `Jr H a f
PUB MINUIJES
3/27/85
• 6" CONSIDER RESOLUTION EXPRESSING DENTON' S INTENT TO ENTER INTO A
This item was presents by Nelson. Laney raise a concern
regarding Argyle s (rutstanding debt. Thompson also raised the
concern regarding the resolution if the legal issue of whether
AWSC can "dedicate" their water lines to Denton, after
annexation by Denton, without Denton paying is not resolved.
Nelson indicated that the problem had been looked into by AWSC,
and that there appeared to be no problems with the legal issues
involved in this agreement. Nelson agreed to have the City
Attorney look at the agreement again.
Thompson made a motion to recommend to the City Council
acceptance of the agreement provided legal issues are
resolved. Second by Herring. Motion carried unanimously.
7. CONSIDER PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF WATER FROM THE CITY
OF DALLAS:, Nelson presented the proposal. The Boar a no
o ect ons with the proposal as outlined. The Board agreed to
review the proposal again at their next meeting and make an
appropriate recommendation at that time.
81 CONSIDER PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR SALE OF WATER TO THE CITY OF
Nelson presents the propose an suggests the
. roposal become effective tentatively in June 1986. Nelson
further requested approval contingent upon City Attorney
approval. Coomes made a motion to recommend to the City
Council approval of the proposed contract. Second by Herring.
Motion carried.
9. CONSIDER ENGINEERS' BROCHURES AND INFORMATION FOR DEVELOPMENT
MANAGEMENT STUDY R TRE ' OF UTILITIE9.1 Laney
requests written reports from the vac ous compan es. Nelson
recommended that two management consulting firms'
representatives make formal presentations at the April
meeting. Herring confirmed the suggestion and further
recommended Theodore Barry Associates and Touche Ross, In
addition, Herring suggested that a sub-committee make out a
list of questions for the companies. Laney suggested that
these representatives be present at our next regular meeting,
April 24, 198S. Volunteers for the sub-committee are Laney,
Coomes, and Herring.
10. CONSIDER PROPOSED OVERSIZE AGREEMENT WITH RIDGEWAY aOieT
VERTORF"FQA'
THE FRONTA(;h OF THEIR PROPERTY: Ham reviewed this agreement
indicating a everything rema ned the same except the parties
to the contract, Herring made a motion to recommend to the
City Council acceptance of the 8 reement with the new owners.
• Second by Thompson, Motion carried.
Ila CONSIDER EVALUKfION Of BID NO, 9406 ELECTRIC METER TEST BOARD:
TOM rev ewe the reconnen a P. Noses Me a notion to
recommend to the City Council approval of the bid. StLcond by
Thompson, Motion carried,
B. ~ :..S Tla •.,r t
DATE: 4/16/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT J l
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council LJ
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Postponement of P:gular Council Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends postponing the regular meeting of May 7, 1985
to May 14, 1985.
SU?4MARY:
As the Council will be attending the American Public Power
Association annual conference on the date of the first
regular meetina in Mai-, this meeting should be postponed until
the following 2!xesday.
BACKGROUND:
PROGRA.yS, DEPAR'r~IENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT.
Not applicable
Respectfully subm te"
r s a un
i;ity Manager
Prepared by:
Charlotte Allen
Name `
Title City Secretary
Approved:
Name
Title
% 717 -',r" '9 y •t "V ~,"y ' e lid J+9.. i* ~'v 6 3°y".
1 • ,
R E S O L U T I O N
f
WHEREAS, a majority of the Council will be oLsc of the City of
Denton on May 7, 1985, and it is necessary that the Council meeting
for such date be postroned until May 149 1985; NOW1 THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY 17E COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
:ECTION I.
That tba regular Council meeting to be held on May 7, 1985 be
postponer until May 14, 1985.
i
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of April, 1985.
C
i
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
51 CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONN,}} TEXAS
BY: ~([iL~I!Li , ~/Sl')'rJiif/ /Il~AsY
3
r
f