Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-18-1985
c ~ ry covNC~c A GENDA •1. .';fi.Y .A i~. fpi II A AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL June 18, 1985 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 18, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m.. 1. Discussion of preliminary plat of the G. F. Moore Subdivision (9 lot single family subdivision) proposed on property located north of T. N. Skiles Road in the City of Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction area for the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation process. 2. Discussion of preliminary plat of proposed Oak Ridge Acres subdivision on property located west of Rockhill Road, east of Wildcat Road, south of F.M. 428 and north of Rhoads Road for the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation process. 3. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e) Art. 62 , .,52-17 V. A. T. S. • B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252.17 V. A. T. S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 62SZ-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252.17 V.A.T.S. Regular ;fleeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 18, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at whic-n 8 the following items will be considered: 7;00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 4, 1985. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommendeO by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to . implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. v t y r. o- r, v 1 , r N Y, r r i. City of 'Denton City Counnil Agenda June 18, 1985 • Page Two A. Bids and Purchase Orders: Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 4.A, 4.8, 4.C). This listing is provided on the Consent. Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. 1. Bid # 9448 - Westgate Heights - street participation 2. Bid 1 9448 - Northwood Addition - waterline participation 3. Bi,'. 0 9453 - Fred Moore Park improvements 4. Did # 9467 - 138 KY line tap Page Road substation S. Purchase Order 0 67403 to American LaFrance in the amount of $4,140.28 6. P.rchase Order 0 68152 to Southern Engine Pump Company in the amount of $80736.00 7. Purchase Order # 68224 to Industrial International in the amount of $3,01S.00 8. Purchase Order 0 68355 to I.S.P. Industries in the amount of $3,924.00 9. Purchase Order # 68508 to Cummins Supply in the amount of $7,800.00 10. Purchase Order 0 68517 to Cummins Supply in the amount of $7,378.27 11. Purchase Order # 68525 to Boyd Excavation in the amount of $21,125.00 B. Plats and Replats: 1. Approval of preliminary plat of lots 1, 2 and 3 of the J. W. Anderson Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of preliminary pplet of lots 1-7, • block A, of the Denton 2A Addition. (The Planning ini Zoning Commission recommends pproval. ) °V(7, p . 1. i City. of Denton City Council Agenda June 18, 198s . Page Three 3. Approval of preliminary and final replat of lots 1-16 of the Montecito East Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of preliminary and final replat of lot 1 and part of lot 2, block 2, of the Sanger Brothers Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) S. Approval of preliminary replat of part of lots 7 and 9 of the Wainwright Addition, and part of block 28 of the Original Town Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Public Hearings: A. Z-1744. Petition of Clark Brothers requesting a c(Pange in zoning from the planned development {PL'-41) district to the general retail (GR) classification on an 11.23 acre tract in the M. L. Austin Survey, Abstract 14. The property is located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 1,500 feet south of East McKinney Street (PM 426). The approved planned development permits multi-family and flood plain/open space land uses on this site. If the zoning change is approved, the pro rty may be utilized for an land use permitted in the general retail 6) district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) B. Z-1745. Petition of Nelles/Davis Interests requesting an amendment to planned development (PD-90). The property is located east of Sherman Drive and Yorkshire Drive and north of Kings Row. The amendment will not change the land uses in the planned development. However, the location of the ten (10) acre community service area would be moved to the .rest, eliminating approximately fourteen (14) single family zoned lots, and the street patterns within the development would be altered. City of Denton City Council Agenda June 181 1985 0Page Four 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending a planned development district to provide for an amended site lan therefor, pursuant to the provisions oEp Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Te;tas as said site plan applies to approximately 119 acres of land out of the McCracken Survey, Abstract 817 located adjacent and east of Sherman Drive and adjacent and north of Kings Row Street; declaring a penalty therefore; and declaring an effective date. Z-1745 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Z-1750. Petition of L. A. Nelson, representing ,Tames F. Mason and Robert W. ,Jones, requestin a change in zoning from the agricultural 1A) classification to the light industrial (LI) classification on 95.265 acres. 'rhe property is located west of I-3SW, approx..ntely 3,500 feet south of Airport Road (FM 1515) and shown in the 0. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56 and the T. W. Daugherty Survey, Abstract No. 356. If the • zoning change is approved, the property may be utilized for any land use permitted in the light industrial (LI) classification by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) D. Hold a public hearing on the petition of the City of Denton and Pat O'Brien for annexation of ii proximately 160 acres of land being a part of thhe C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and the M.E.P. $ P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 950, and situated north and south of Paige Road between I-35E and Swisher Road (A-20). E. Hold a public hearing on the petition of Bruce R. West for voluntary annexation of approximately 258.66 acres being part of the S. Myers Survey, Abstract No. 843, and the A. Miller Survey, Abstract 887, and beginning' west of Underwood Road, east of C. Wolfe Road, south of Jim Christal Road, and north of Tom Cole Road (A-21). 4. Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. L City of Uenton City Council Agenda June 18, 1985 7 ge Five B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids; and providing for an <<fective date. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance instituting annexation proceedings for a tract of land contiguous and adjacent to the City of Denton, Texas; being all that lot, tract or parcel of land consisting of approximately 361.71 acres of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the V. E. Gailor Survey, Abstract No. 452 and K. May Survey, Abstract No. 807, Denton County, Texas; . classifying the same as agricultural "A" district F roppeerty; and declaring an effective date A-16). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an apreement for the purchase of untreated water from the City of Dallas; authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement and providing for an effective date. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the sale of 0.144 acres of real property as described herein; authorizing the Mayor to execute the, documents transferring title thereto; and providing for an effective date. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas and Wade Miser, providing inspection functions for the Public Works Depatment and providing an effective date, S. Resolutions: • A, Consider approval of a resolution closing Pembrooke and Lynhurst from their intersections with Longridge and Pennsylvania for a block party. 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda ~ne 18, 1985 ge Six B, Consider approval of a resolution supporting the concept of County funding for pjblic libraries. C. Consider approval of a resclution appointing Richard 0. Stewart to a two year term to Place 4 of the Board of Directors of tine Texas Municipal Power Agency. 4. Approval of preliminary plat of ►he Surrey Ridge Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 7. Receive the Planning and Zoning Commission recommenda- tion for the Five Year Capital Im prove►ent Plan. 8• Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C, Personnel D. Board Appointments New Business: This item provides a section for Coun:il Members to suggest items for future agendas. C h R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was )osted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of tenton, Texas, on day of (Jj° 1985 at o' clock C1' 1815C AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL June 18, 1985 Work Session of the Cit;? of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 18, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will he considered: 5:30 p.m. 1. Discussion of preliminary plat of the G. F. Moore Subdivision (9 lot single fabily subdivision) proposed on property located north of T. N. Skiles Road in the City of Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction area for the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation process. 2. Discussion of preliminary plat of proposed Oak Ridge Acres subdivision on property located west of Rockhill Road, east of Wildcat Road south of F.M. 428 and north of Rhoads Road for the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation process. 3. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V. A. T.S. b. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6251-17 V. A. T. S. L. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6152-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 1(g), Art 6252.17 V. A.T.S. Regular ~4eeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 18, 19859 at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 4, 1985. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. 1 r City of Denton City Council Agenda Jayne 18, 1985 Page Two A. Bids and Purchase Orders: Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. DetaileJ back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda item, 4.A, 4.B, 4.C). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. 1. Bid 1 9448 - Westgate Height, street participation 2. Bid 1 9448 - Northwood Addition - waterline participation 3. Bid 1 9453 - Fred Moore Park improvements 4. Bid i 9467 - 138 KV line tap Page Road substation 5. Purchase Order 1 67403 to American LaFrance in the amount of $4,140.28 6. Purchase Order / 68151 to Southern Engine Pump Co ,y in the amount of $8,736.00 7. Purchase Urder 1 68214 to Industrial International in the amount of $3,015.00 8. Purchase Order 68355 to I.S.P. Industries in the amount of $3,924.00 9. Purchase Order 1 68508 to Cummins Supply in the amount of $7,800.00 10. Purchase Order 1 68517 to Cummins Supply in the amount of $7,378.27 11. Purchase Order 1 68525 to Boyd Excavation in the amount of $21,125.00 B. Plats and Replats: 1. Approval of preliminary plat of lots 1, 2 and 3 of the J. W. Anderson Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of preliminary plat f lots 1-79 block A, of the Denton 2 Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) F I w, 7. City of Denton City Council Agenda June 18, 1985 Page Three 3. Approval of preliminary and final replat of lots 1-16 of the Montecito East Addition. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of preliminary and final replat of lot 1 and part of lot 2, block 2, of the Sanger Brothers Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) S. Approval of preliminary replat of part of lots 7 and 9 of the Wainwright Addition, and part of block 28 of the Original Town Addition. (she Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Public }Hearings: A. Z-1744. Petition of Clark Brothers requesting a cfiange' in zoning from the planned development (PD-41) district to the general retail (GR) classification on an 11.23 acre tr,3ct in the M. L. Austin Survey, Abstract 04. Tliv property is located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 1,500 feet south of East McKinney Street (m 426). The appruvi~d planned development permits multi-family and flood plain/open space land uses on this si %e, If the toning change is approved, the property may be utilized for any land use permitte3 in the general retail (GR) district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) B. Z-1745. Petition of Nelles/Davis Interests requesting an amendment to planned development (PD-90). The property is located east of Sherman Drive and Yorkshire Drive and north of Kings Row. The amendment will not change the lard uses in the planned development. However, the location of the ten (10) acre community service area would be moved to the west, eliminating approximately fourteen (14) single family zoned lots, and the street patterns within the development would be altered, II 14, City of Denton City Council Agenda June 18, 198S Page Four 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending a planned development district to provide for ?n amended site plan therefor, pursuant to the provisions of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Penton, Texas as said site plan applies to approximately 129 acre, of land out of the McCracken Survey, Abstract 817 located adjacent and east of Sherman Drive and adjacent and north of Kings Row Street; declaring a penalty therefore; and declaring an effective date. Z-1745 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Z-1750. Petition of L. A. Nelson, representing Tames F. Mason and Robert W. Jones, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the light industrial (LI) classification on 95.265 acres. The property is located west of T-35W, approximately 3,500 feet south of Airport Road (1:M 1515) and shuwn in the 0. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56 and the T. W. Daugherty Survey, Abstract No. 3S6. If the zoning change is approved, the property may be utilized for any land use permitted in the light industrial (LI) classification by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) D. Hold a public hearing on the petition of the City of Denton and Pat O'Brien for annexation of approximately 160 acres of land being a part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract 13309 and the M.E.P. & P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 950, and situated north and south of Paige Road between I-35E and Swisher Road (A-20). E. Hold a public hearing on the petition of Bruce R. West for voluntary annexation of approximately 258.66 acres being part of the S. Myers Survey, Abstract No. 843, and the A. Miller Survey, Abstract 887, and beginning west of Underwood Road, east of C. Wolfe Road, south of Jim Christal Road, and north of Tom Cole Road (A-21). 4. Ordinances: 91. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bid; and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. City of Denton City Council Agenda June 18, 1985 Page Five 8. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing fc., the award of contracts for public works or improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids; and providing for an effective date. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance instituting annexation proceedings for a tract of land contiguous and adjacent to the City of Denton, Texas; tieing all that lot, tract or parcel of land consisting of approximately 361.71 acres of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the V. E. Gailor Survey, Abstract No. 452 and li. May Survey, Abstract No. 807, Denton County, Texas; classifying the same as agricultural "A" district property; and declaring an effective date 1 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an apreement for the purchase of untreated i.4ater from the City of Dallas; authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement and providing for an effective date. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the sale of 0.144 acres of real property as described herein; authorizing the Mayor to execute the documents transferring title thereto; and providing for an effective date. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas and Wade Miser, providing inspection functions for the Public Works Depatment and providing an effective date. S. Resolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution closing Pembrooke and Lynhurst from their intersections with Longridge and Pennsylvania for a block party. City of Denton City Council Agenda June 18, 1985 Page Six B. Consider approval of a resolution supporting the concept of County funding for public libraries. C. Consider approval of a resolution appointing Richard 0. Stewart to a two year teiri to Place 4 of the Board of Directors of the Te.~as Municipal Power Agency. 6. Approval of preliminary plat of the Surrey Ridge Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 7. Receive the Planning and Zoning Commission recommenda- tion for the 'rive Year Capital Improvement Plan. 8. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 9. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. C E R 'f 1 P I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the, day of 1985 at o'clock 181 5C DATE. 6/18/95 *sY C0~'x~rt. as gORT FOyIU►T O F ~ Mayor and Members of the City Council f~ T0: FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE PROPOSED G. F. MOORS SUBDIVISION (NINE LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION) PROPOSED ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF T. N. SKILES ROAD IN THE CITY OF DENTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AREA FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER TO BEGIN THE ANNEXATION PROCESS. RECOMMENDATION: No recommendation is available at this time. SUMMARY: This is a nine (9) lot single family detached subdivision proposed on 58.163 acres located north and west of T. N. Stiles Road. This site to located approximately 3 1/2 miles from the nearest Denton city limit line and approximately 2,000 feet from the City of Ponder. City of Denton subdivision and land development regulations are applicable to subdivisions in the extraterritorial jurisdiction area. of neig overlap,, thetsubdivisionrregulaticneiofitheocity withhthetgreateres population takes precedence. Your S acre lots, three 6.721 acre lots, one 8 acre lot, and or,e 10 acre lot are proposed. Individual septic tanks and water wells are proposed. The nearest public utilities maintained by the City of Denton are approximately 18,000 feet south and west of this site. All the lots Out T. N. Stiles Road, a recently reconstructed county road. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUF3 AFFECTED: Developers and all city operations required to provide basic services if annexed. FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Resai Ilm sub t d: 0. Chris Hartung Prepared bCity Manager Dav d Ellison Senior Planner Appr ed Jeff may Director of Planning and Community Development 1027a ~ P ti ~ d ti~~= FAP • . o e I S 04, • o l 0 0 ►1 ~O ; V . 1101)y •Rd. • . Jib N z°Ch►, 1 R Iti+• • ' . Id Stony Rd. • ♦ .•w m tE 16 ~ r S ~ ~E ti' rug ; . 1L- .j 0: ~ ltlata . • f - r • t ~ Kci f M ~ , • • . Tom ►C E LMER d• • • ` • . . s .r~i r al kid. 1) 1 G.F_MoDte Sui~. ~a •i 1 a N p'' M N. tIIt1 Rd. Or • t Spry 3 ~l - J a n~ urn= ">,L~' r S • V l ',•~r poNo Amy* Rd. x d d PALMER\ •po 20 -i vI . oc • OAIRrELD r • ~iv~ ~11I e ' - -2v dc CPR all. r. ♦rr • a& *r= r s 11 iiy~ l~ • r M • ' , A. v e L' o~ O[~► d H.Lirel Rd. r.~e o L 3 L a 5 /e~ u e 3 I1 ~ u. M. .Ir r Rd. u _ e q y 1•b t t a~ Y n a ~ I • i~a ti ~°Swofford Rd v~.~ yl`IM Ad .U.9 t v ' • ► / r " / v v~i . I ~ '~FM Swofford Rd?9 r r l r ^rar Ord Ad ON OF ' otitetln ren+eler 4f'd ~•"NORT04LAKE V if y M e ;n•M: it t 000 20 e fooncomol'oty Cr'd. V•j ~,rartOrd Rd 1'rery _ zrz=wx wt 1M.MW-=Jrr2rr *00 f Rdti ~rp• e L rQ ' td 4#11111 Ad. U • ' t.► 1 • Za o -a L v C E or1 Heath ° Old ~.SNA Rd. o g E FYI ` ' v Pre?lrle MouAS ? 1 . Y d . ' \ oy • Mari 3K'M:n =54 .7¢♦ i 4 .,1~ Sam Cow14aPd za, ' J l R• ' 1. . • e /JU%TIN ►CORRAL ! lo" V r ' ttS r e r~ 1~ POP 20vIESt~t Nu tley na eM ti 'ti _",r~.l.; mss:; Q KI • x 2 Of a { DATE: 06/18/85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT ) r TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council - - FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE PROPOSED OAK RIDGE ACRES SUBDIVISION ON PROPFRTY LOCATED HEST OF ROCKHILL ROAD, EAST OF WILDCAT ROAD, SOUTH OF FM 428s AND NORTH OF RHOADS ROAD FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER TO BEGIN THE ANNEXATION PROCESS. RECOMMENDATION: No recommendation is cvailable at this time. SUMMARY: This site is located approximately 1 112 miles north, and east from the nearest city limit line (500 foot strip annexed in 1984). Hartlee Field Road is approximately three miles west and south of the tract, and FM 428 is approximately two miles north. Twenty-four (24) minimum two acre lots that will accommodate single family detached land use are proposed. The nearest City of Denton public utilities are approximately 24,000 feet away. The developers have requested water service from the Roc khill Water Supply Company. Applications have been made for individual septic systems. Estate type roads built to City of Denton specifications are proposed. BACKGROUND: N/A PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Developers and all City of Denton operations which provide basic services to annexed territory. FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Respectfull submit dd e _ 0. Chris artung Prepared by: City Manager David Ellison Senior Planner Appro d: Jeff Meye ao~ 1W V_ Director of Planning and Community Development 085s o ` 'tom s. • + e••oe.a Ac a.: 11ee~ • • try 1 W *160 volley vi 4 • , • - • f ► M X11 a ! . 1 ' ff~ • qtr++l• • t •f. ~1 • ~ V ~ ~ Z • ~ ' ~ C ` L AID so* OOS ?aa Au on- ~4 !f11 • 801•.^ rq ;•IG2• Wt V • • r • ' • KR GER z • • • I • r0 1 . .'ti~ • Rfrf~h R~~ ~yi ; t Ilk • • s: K s J / NEW • • • I Arrla . MIN ad. • S • a Illy - ..1•~ Orr. /11+~ • all • • r i CROSS ROADS 30 of woo L d6 14 ago • 1 •aalr s , ~ • , v~ a ~ s e.0 46 t op . . 14 • ' r , t. r.' 06 ♦A. tea , J•~ Y r Minutes Development Review Co;nmittee may 29, 1985 DRC Members Present: Don McLaughlin, Robert Nagemann, Tommy Stone, David Ellison, David Salmon, Robbie Baughman, Ray Rumfield, Chris Smith, Denise Spivey, and Steve Brannan Engineer, Planner# Architect, Surveyor, or other development interests present: Greg Edwards i IV. Review of the Preliminary Plat of the Oakridge Acres Addition A. Engineering 1. Need gross acreage of total subdivision. 2. Contour lines at 5' intervals. 3. Outside boundary of subdivision should be darker and wider in size. 4. 1'.= 100' scale is acceptable. 5. Need drainage easement fdr existing channel. 6. Sizing and grades on channels needed for continuation of drainage study. 7. Driveway culvert sizing for final plat, 8. Consider dedicating right-of-way and building on arterial street on the north or south side of this tract. B. Transportation Engineering No comment. No representative was present. C. Building Inspection inspections required on water and sewer lines installations if connected to City services. D. Fire 1. Fire hydrants required every 600 feet. 2. Must provide an all weather 4riving surface on not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width, with ade- quate roadway turning radius capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus before construction begins. Minutes Development Review Committee Oakridge Acres Addition may 29, 1985 Page 2 D. Fire (Continued) 3. Fire hydrants and water syst?m must be operational before construction begins. 4. Water flow required for fir( protection 500 g.p.m. E. Lone Star Gas Service is not available. F. G.T.E. Service is available from Souttwestern Bell. G. Water and Sewer 1. Black Rock Water Supply Coiipany water line must be approved by the City of Denton. 2. Developer may apply for infividual lot permits for water wells and septic tancs to Director of Utilities. 3. Developer may apply for Co-op water well and sanitary sewer systems with package sewage treatment plant. All utilities must meet City Subdivision Regulations including adequate fire flow (500 g.p.m. for single family development). Firi hydrants to be placed 600 feet apart. 4. Outside city limits approial is required if City lines are extended to developmert. H. Electric Not within service area of Cily of Denton Electric Utility Department. I. Solid Waste Service not available, because the development is outside of the city limits. J. Parks and Recreation No developed neighborhood par; area currently exists. i MONISM Minutes Development Review Committee Oakridge Acres Addition May 29, 1985 Page 3 K. Planing and Community Development 1. Please consider attached annexation policy of the city of Denton. 2. The Planning and Community Development Department will forward an annexation study to the City Council at 5:30 on June 18, 1985 for direction on whether the annexation process should be initiated. city council minutes June 4, 1985 The Council convened into the work Session at 5:30 P.M. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Ma;loE Stewart; Mayor Pro TOM Hopkins; Council Members Altord, Chew, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens City Managet, City Attorney, and city secretary ABSENT: None 1. The Council cnceived a presentation by Joella Orr, Library Director, of funding proposals to present to the Denton County Commissioner's Court tot FY 1985-86 for the Denton Public Library. Joella Ore, Library Director, reported that a funding plan had been presented to the Denton County Commissioner's Court which detailed three levels of services. Level 1 funding rapreaeated $1.00 per capita plus matching local funds up to a maximum of $25,000 (as incentive to developing libraries) or $1.25 per transaction fee for Denton County (out of city) residents to be charged to the county. Level 2 funding would be $1.00 per capita plus matching funds up to a maximum of $10,000. Level 3 funding was simply $1.00 per capita. No. Orr further reported that she had voted for Levels 2 and 3 with the understanding that they would be presented to the Commissioner's Court with additional comments that these levels were suitable tot small libraries. The Denton Public Library had developed the 1985-86 proposed budget without these ptojeeted funds as no commitment had been made by the County. Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager. asked Ms. Oct to briefly report what 'the impact would be on the budget should the County decide dot to fund the library. Me. Ore responded that 201 of the transactions at the library vets by out of city residents. The tact that the librar; currently charged an $11 tee per card tot other than City of Denton patrons had only reduced the usage by 44. However, as the county grew. the out of city use would become mote of a financial burden on the citizens of Denton. Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins asked it Ms. Or., agreed with the proposed program of funding and it to, why. Me. Ore replied she did agree but with Level 1 funding only. The library was currently serving all county residents and the $11 out of city card fee did not recover the cost of the services provided. Council Member Riddlesperger stated that the City Council had set the tee to out of city Easidents at $11 with the hopes that the county would restore their previous funding level. Mayor Pro Tea Hopkins stated that he hoped that some mutually agreeable solution could be worked out with the County Commissioner's Court to that all County residents could use the library. No. Ore reported that the Level 1 funding would cover 20% of the budget tot the next fiscal year. Council Mesbee Chew stated that it Level i funding could not be obtained, perhaps the City should not accept any funds and review tho $11 charge to out of city residents. Council Mambet Stephens asked it the cost of service study was to be updated durin7 the summer. City Manager Chris Hartung responded that an update of currant cost figures could be obtained, Ma of Stewart stated that the City had continued to work in good faith to solve all County residents with the library taailitlos; however, it funding vas not received the aervice should be halted. f City council minutes meeting of Jane 4. 1985 Page Two Council Member diddlesperyer stated that he would hate to set citizens discouraged from UR{ ftg the library. No. Orr cone':u1e4 by statia7 that staff would prepare a service proposal for the County at Levcl 1 funding. 2. The Council held a discussion of a petition for voluntary annexation by residents of Vacation Village Estates for the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation process. David Ellison. Senior Planner, reported that 3 residents from vacation Village had contacted him re;arding annexation. Vacation "411age Estates was located 2 1/2 ■ilve Cccz the existing city limits line. A SO feet strip would here to be kxtended down East McKinney prior to annexation of this propfrty. Vacation Village was located in an area of potential development. The taiidents felt the current level of services (much as police. Ciro, animal control, etc.) was so poor, assistance was needed from the City of Denton. Cost estimates of service extension had been provided to the City council in the agenda materials. There were 3 alternatives for extending utilities. Curren*.:! theta were no fire hydrants and the existing water system would not meet City codes. The scale of this proposed annexation was unique in that in 1983 the City annexed 1,291.61 acres but less than 200 people. There was an estt-lted population on 770 people in this one annexation. The issue before staff was the larga population to be annexed and the extension of city of Denton services. Mayor Stewart stated that this would be a voluntary annexation but would first involve the extension of a 500 feet strip to reach Vacation Village. Ellison reported that staff had not calculated the size of the involuntary annexation area. Council Member Biddlespargar stated that the Council had discussed this area previously and it was just a matter of time until annexation proceedings were begun. Council Member McAdams stated that the question was whether the City could address the problems which existed with regard to the streets and drainage. Bob Nelson. Director of Utilities, reported that the city presently was taking the sewerage from Vacation village and owned the closest lift station. There was a well system for water. One of the proposed conditions tot annexation would be the extension of a sufficient water line to this area. The Utility Department would want to oversize the lines for future development. The cost to Vacation Village would be $200,000. It the existing water system was substandscd, the City would not accept it. The City could opt to install the water and sewer lines and change a pro rata. He did not believe the water was sufficient at this time to handle fits protection services., the tower system was presently adequate but would not be for long. As previously exptsesed, the extension of ado US to water lines should be a condition of annexation. Another option would be tot the City to accept the well system and provide domestic water only (not fte fit* protection) and wait for future development to extend the largec linos. Mayor Pro TOR Hopkins stated that a previous legal opinion had held that a water district would have to be purchased totally, not just a portion. He than aeked what other than Vacation Village was stated by this particular water district. A resident of Vacation Village responded the water district alto served Camp COppas, good's Camp and some duplexes. City Council Mlnates Meeting of June 4. 1985 Page These Mayor Stewatt stated that the concern would be fire service and asked if the City could contract with the Mayhill Fire Department. The Legal Department was asked to check into that possibility. Mayor Pro Taw Hopkins stated that the Council should also consider what the citcumatances would be in the next 3 to 5 Yeats. tf the annexation were delayed now, tha City night be faced with having to replace everything when the property was eventually annexed. Council Member McAdams stated that it might be that future development in this area would solve the problem. Mayor Pro Tbm Hopkins stated that, if that were the case, the pro rata charged to Vacation Village residents now would be tepayed. Nelson asked who would pay the $200,000. Ellison responded the current residents could pay as there wart approximately 200 units in Vacation Village Estates. Nelcon then reported the city could extend the utilities via pro rata or through the Capital Improvements Program. Council Member Riddlesperger asked if the water lines of the water district wore of sufficient site. Nelson replied not for fire protection. Council Member McAdams then stated that inadequate fire protection would affect the City's insurance key rate, Council Membor Chew stated that fire response time would go down which would affect the key rate and all Denton's residents would have to pay. Mayor Pro Tea Hopkins stated that perhaps a new fits station could be located in this quadrant of the City. Council Member McAdams stated that there would be $200,000 initial cost of the extension of utilities. Also to be considered was the street situation and all other city services. Where would this money come from. Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins teplte3 that if any development occurred between Denton and Vacation Village Estates prior to annexation, it had the potential of all 'sing substandard to City codes. Council Member Stephens askiid, if annexation was begun, who developed the service agreement. Nelson responded the Utilities Department would. Council Meabet Stephens then asked with whom would the City negotiate. Ellison responded the Vacation Village Homeowners Association. Nelson added the City would also need to negotiate with the Water district. Chew motion, Stspbons second to begin the annexation proceedings. Motion carried unanimously. 3. The Council held A discussion on a letter of inquiry from a resident of the City of Copper Canyon concerning possible future annexation by the City of Denton. li City Council Kinutos Meeting of June 4, 198S Page Four David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that Me. June Tyler of Copper Canyon had expressed some concerns rega.eing the water supply in the next 10 years. Her primacy question was it the water supply can out, who would annex Copper Canyon. Mayor Stewart asked about the conditions of the streets. Ellison replied the current streets wets seal coAt with no curbs or guttering. Most housing was located on 1 acre lots. The density would not be as gceat as that of Vacation Village. Some bridge tepairs would have to be made. Copper Canyon was, however, a long way from the current Denton city limits line. Ks. June Tyler, Copper Canyon, spoke stating that the water was currently supplied by the Ba:tonville water system and the water table was lowering. In 10 to 20 years the residents of this atea would have to be annexed by s city that could provide water. Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins asked if Copper Canyon could not contract to buy water from Denton Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, responded yes. Mayor Pro Tea Hopkins then reiterated that Copper Canyon was not pact of the Denton sewer system. Nelson then responded that it SO% of the water sold was not returned to the Denton system. Copper Canyon could not purchase «tet from Denton. Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, further reported that this portion of Copper Canyon wo,116 have to disannex from the remainder of Copper Canyon prior to annexation by ')enton. This disannexatton would requite an election in Copper Canyon. Mayor Pro Tea Hopkins asked it the Denton extraterritorial jurisdiction met Copper Canyon. Ellison responded yes, at one point for approximately 1,000 feet. City Ka..iaget Chris Hactung re-~octed there was also a matter of protocol. The Council should be dealing with the city government of Copper Canyon and not a resident. Mayor Stewart told No. Tyler that the Council could not act at this time and suggested that the Council of Copper Canyon contact Denton at A future date. 4. The Council held a discussion of the petition of Fields, Edwards and Associates, Inc. representing Miller of Texas, for voluntatyy annexation of approximately 104.9 acres tot the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation ptocess. The 304.9 acre request is composed of tour separate parcels described as follows: A. Approximately 115.12 acres lying and being a part of the W. Durham Survey, Abstract Number 00, end beginning adjacent and north and adjacent and south of FK 426 (test Mainney) approximately 1,000 feet east of Trinity Road. S. Approximately S3.94 acres lying in and being a pact of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, and beginning adjacent and east of Trinity Road, approximately 2,000 feet north of FM 426. C. Approximately 27.84 acres lying in and being a pact of the M. Forrest Survey. Abstract No. 417, and beginning approximately 800 feet east of Trinity Road and 3,000 fret north of FM 426. 0. Approximately 108.04 acres lying in and being a pact of the M. Fotcest Survey, Abstract No. 417, and beginning at the northwest cocner of Trinity Road and Slagg Road approximately 10300 feet south of U.S. Hwy, 380 East. . , 13 City Council Minutes Meeting of Juno 4, 1965 Pags !'lve David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that this w.a a voluntary annexation. The purpose was to extend the city limits in this area for residential development. There'currently was no population or on-going development in the parcel. Council Member Riddlesperger asked about the geographical relationship between this parcel and Vacation Village Estates. Ellison responded the two were in proximity only: however, the development potential for this area was fairly serious. Chew motion, McAdams second to begin the annexation process. Motion carried unanimously. S. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal r;attece, coal a3tate, personnel and board appointmenta. No official action was taken. The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chashers. PRESENT, Mayor Stewart: Hayor Pro Ten Hopkins: Council Members Alford. Chew. McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephet:s City !tanager, City Attorney, and City Secretary ABSENT: None 1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the 8egular Meeting of May 14, 196S: the Special Called Meeting of May 21, 1985 and the Special Called Meeting of May 26, 198S. Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to approve the Minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Consent Agenda McAdams motion, Hopkins eecond to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. Consent Agenda: A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid 0 9450 - Electric meters and sockets 2. Hid 0 9457 - Vertical blinds. City Hall/ Phase 111 3. Bid 6 9464 - Padmount awitchgear 4. Bid 6 9465 - Coveralls for Solid Waste S. Bid M 9466 - Asphalt/toad eatertals 6. Bid • 9469 - Fiberglass street poles 7. Purchase order R 66381 to Basic Waste Syrtems in the amount of $4,307.42 e. Purchase Order N 66336 to Marley Cooling Tower Company in the amount of 121,43S.00 9. Purchase Order N 68246 to J. S. Equipment Company in the amount of 13,403.03 City council minutes Keating of June 4, 1985 Page Six B. Plats, 1. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Cacolisa Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Chestnut Square Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 34.68 acres situated in the K. Fattest Survey, Abstract 417, and beginning approximately 250 fact south of and perpendicular to the centerline of FM 426 and approximately 2,000 feet east of Mayhill Road A-14 David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that this was a voluntary annexation. Staff bad no new information to add. The following ordinance was presented: NO. SS-105 AN 0RDINMCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 34.60 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND SEING PART OF THE M. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; )ND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins notion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. on toll call vote. McAdams "eye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor S'swart "aye." motion carried unanimously. 4. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 150.0 acres located west of Mayhill Road approximately 4,000 feet notth of I-a5 and adjacent and north of the MK&T Railroad A-17 David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that 50 acres of this parcel was a voluntary annexation and 100 actas was being annexed at the initiation of the City. With the completion of this procedure, all of the west side of Mayhill Road would be within the city limits. The following ordinance was presented: NO. as-106 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT Or LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXtKJ.TELY 1S0 ACRES Or LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THr- D. HOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 646, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE GAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EPFP,CTIVE DATE. Stephens notion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On toil call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "eye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." motion carried unanimously, S. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public neatin9 on the petition of 2. 0. McDonnell requesting a change in toning from the agricultural City council Minutes Meeting of June 4, 1985 Page Seven (h) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 39.4 acre tract located on the south side of FM 426 (East McKinney Street) approximately 2,090 feet east of Mayhill Road. If approved, the planned development will permit the following land uses: 5.9 acres - general retail 33.5 acres - duplex Z-1725 The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that this tract was located in a low intensity area which was presently free of development. The intensity would not be exceeded by this petition if developed. Duplexes would be consistent with the area. The Planning and Zoning Commission had considered the probability that slightly exceeding the general retail concentration was not sufficient to recommend denial. There vice 5 reply forms mailed with 0 returned. Hopkins motion, McAdams second to approve th-0 petition with the conditions as attached by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. a. The Council held a public heating on the petition of Hammett b Nash, Inc. requesting a Change in toning (tom the agricultural (h) classification to the planned development (PD) district tot light industrial (LI) uses on a S0.1 acre tract located on thb west side of Mayhtll Road 4,300 feet north of interstate 35 North. Z-1727 The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No on spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that this was the public hearing regarding zoning on one of the parcels which was annexed earlier in the agenda. This was a high intensity area and light industrial zoning was compatible. The planned development classification would enable the City to control undesit_ble land uses and to control engineering during platting. Thera were 2 reply forms mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 returned in opposition. Council Member Stephens asked at what stage in the development would staff reserve area for the proposed loop. Spivey stated that would not be done at this time. St*Vhens motion, Riddlesperger second to approve the petition with the conditions as attW.ed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council held a public heating on the petition of City of Denton requesting an amendment to planned development (PD-81), an 8.74 acre tract located at the southwest cornet of Highway 377 and Cactoll Boulevard. The current planned development included office, retail and restaurant land uses. A condition attached to the planned development toad as follows: 'Both sides of Collins $traat from Fort Worth Drive to the intecoaction of Collins and Cleveland Street shall be improved by the developer. Halt of Cieveland Street actosa the entire frontage of the subject tract shall be improved pet normal City of Denton City Council Minutes Hooting of June 4, 1985 Page Eight perimeter street requirements. Street improvements may occur in phases or as development occurs.• The developer wished to amend the condition listed above to state that he be requited to improve only halt of Collins Street from Port Worth Drive to the intersection of Collins and Cleveland Street. Z-1649 The Mayor opened the public heatins. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the publio hearing. Denise Spivey, Urban Planner. reported that 27 reply forms had been mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 returned is opposition. This was a requested amendment to PD-81. In a planned development, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council had the authority to require off-site improvements. The subdivision rules and regulations required improvement to 1/2 of tbo street. The condition that the petitioner improve both sides of Collins street was approved in June, 1984 in order to handle the traffic which would be generated by this development. The proposed development would have commercial and retail uses and Y:ollins Street at the present time only had one access pain- to Tort Worth Drive. it this amendment were granted, staff felt it would violate the cost of service philosophy. McAdam notion, Chew second to deny the amendment to PD-81. Notion to deay cstried 4 to 3 with Council Member Riddlespetger, council Member t.lfted and Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins casting the nay" votes. U. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of City of Denton requesting a change in toning from the two family (24) classification to the aulti-tamily (Mr-1) district on a 7.2 acre ttaot located in the John McGowan Survey, Abstract No. 797. The property is situated south of Interstate Highway 356, and east of Lillian Miller Partway. It the request is approved, this property may be used for any purpose permitted in j Multi-Family 1 zone by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. Z-1733 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Howard McNeill spoke in favor and requested that the petition be changed to MF-S instead of KF-1. Council Member McAdams stated that the notice prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing was for MF-1 and had been denied. Was it appropriate toe the City Council to change the request without benefit of review by the Planning and Zoning commission. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that she would need to do a thorough reseatch of the legality of the request. Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins asked if a motion to table the petition In order for the legal resaareh to be completed was in order. Mayor Stewart replied that a motion to table would be to order unless the public hosting was continued. Council Masher McAdams stated that the tequ4st for MF-1 had been denied by Planning and toning commission by a unanimous vote of 7 to 0. The Council could ove •uls the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation tar denial • 1 6 affirmative votes. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the publio hearing. 77-7 , City council Minut-eq Meeting of June 1, 1905 Page Nine Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that the tract was located in a moderate intensity area which was approximately 781 over the intensity standard tot that area based on existing toning. tncceasing the toning would aggravate that situation add mote traffic to an already heavily congested aces. Mr-1 toning vas not an appropriate butter for single family areas to the south ani west of this land. Unrestricted multi-family toning would not allow any conditions to be attached to this development to protect the existing, adjacent low intensity areas. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial by a vote of 7 to 0 which would take 6 affirRative votes by the Council to overturn the denial of the request. Council Meabsc Chew ikod that, due to the problem with this particular toning, would it bs appropriate to deny this petition and cater it back to the Plar.ning and Zoning Commission with a waiver of the tees. The Planning and Zoning Commission could then readvertise the petition as MF-R. Mayor Stewart stated that was one of the options for action. The petition could ales be tabled. Mayor Pro Tea Hooking stated that the only purpose to tabling the petition was to allow tine for a legal opinion. Chew notion, Hopkins second to deny the petition and send it back to the Planning and Zoning Commission as MP-R with the city of Denton as the petitioner and waive the fees. Motion caecled unanimously. 8. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of the City of Denton and Pat O'Brien for annexation of approximately 160 acres of land being a part of the 0. Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and the M.E.P. 6 P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 950, and situated north and south of Paige Road between 1-3SE and Swisher Road A-20 The Mayor opened the public hearing. David Ellison, Senior Planner, spoke in favor of the petition reporting that this petition had been precipitated by a request for a 41.6 acre pc)posed mobile home park on Paige Road. Theta had been several requests during the last several yeaca for mobile hose park land use in this quadrant and staff had identified this aces as being saturated with this type of housing. The Denton Development Guide policy was that manufacturing housing should be dispersed throughout the City and specific concentrations should not exceed 200 units within a 1/2 ails distance. Within this particular 160 acres area was land which was previously outside of the city limits along both the north ,rnd south pact of Paige Road. During the discussion phase, the Council had indicated it would be logical to begin to round off the boundaries of such areas as this, patticuarly in instances where there was actual development potential and in those instances where the City could petition with individuals who were coquetting voluntary annexation. Approximately 41.6 acres along the south side of Paige of this parcel was voluntary and approximately 120 acres was involuntpty, There were 7 to 9 Individual residences in the parcel, perhaps mote. The Sherwood Mobile Home Park was included. The pack had no fire hydrants in place but wets connected to the City of Denton sewer system and were on well water. Sherwood Mobile Home Park was adding approximately 15 late now which were not in conformance with the City mobile home park and travel trailer requirements. There was some adjoining property to the east which was undeveloped. Staff felt that the potential was there for Sherwood to expand in the future; there was no indication that this expansion was an actual propotal at this tine. According to the service plan for annexed tttcitoty, at the effective date of annexation, police and fire protection would be provided. Traffic devices would be Installed as needed and water for domestic, commercial and Industrial use Would be provided at City rates from existing City lines on the effective date of annexation. The principle issue in this annexation was that it was involuntary which avant that water and sewer services would not be City Council Minutes Meeting of June 4, 198S Page Ten extended at the expense of the city of Denton. Typically this was done as new development occurced or as lines were run across areas of new development that would impact existing residences or existing uses. The City could also look at extending Ltility services to areas which voce recently annexed thcouith the Capital improvements program at a future date. The City did not quarantes utility service to these arms. Solid waste service would be provided within 1 month of the effective annexation date and emergency maintenance of streets as well a- routine maintenance would begin on the effective date of annexation. Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, storm drainage facilities and curb and guttering would be done as the need occurced, or as pact of the Capital improvements Program In some instances. Code enforcement services would commence immediately with the annexation. Another issue which frequently was raised was what could be done as tar as any existing use of property which was underway at the time of annexation which might not comply with the City of Denton toning regulations. Newly annexed property was typically toned as agricultural until individual owners petitioned tot other toting. Any existing land use at the time of annexation was permitted; only expansions of that use would requite Planning and Zoning Commission and Council approval after annexation. The Council could continue the annexation proceedings by an affirmative motion and vote; however, taking no specific action by the Council would allow the process to continue. The second public hearing on this annexation would be held on June 18. Council could instruct staff to remove any properties from the petition until final action was taken. Council Member McAdams asked it staff had received indications from the residents that they did not wish to be annexed. Ellison responded that 12 reply forms had been mailed with 1 returned in opposition and 0 in favor. Mrs. H. K. Pockeus spoke in opposition and stated that she would like to know it the corner of Paige Road and t-35E would be residential. Ellison responded that there were no plane for this area. The proposed mobile home park was approximately 750 feet south of that particular corner. F. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of the City of Denton tot annexation of approximately 115 acres of land being I pact of the J. West Survey, Abstract 1331, and located north of Highway 380 east and west of Rockhill Road A-22 The Mayor opened the public hearing. David Ellison, Senior Planner, spoke in favor and pointed out where Hartley Field Road was on the overhead projected map as a point of cetecence tot the audience. This was a continuation of a previously discussed plan to extend a minimum 500 feet strip north and east in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction to a point to as to allow protection of Denton's future water source. Staff had thought that there was 1 private property owner who would be effected. A closer analysis of the tax tolls showed that Mc. Ray Lynches property abutted the proposed amp, but was not included. There was no privately owned property in the parcel. All land in '.his proposed annexation was owned by the city of Dallas. Mc. Bill Lynch spoke in opposition stating that his land might be involved in this annexation. It was thought that ordinance 84-25 did not take in any private land2 however, the map, the :field notes and the ordinance were incorrect as 11 112 acres of his property had been annexed in tbAt action. The map did not track with the field notes. This annexation would take in 111 acres of his property. He had not been notified of this annexation or the annexation in 1984, tt the 1991 annexation woe void, then this annexation was illegal as the City vould be extending the S00 feet strip from a beginning point which was not in the city limits. i city council Minutes Meeting of June e. 1985 Page Eleven City Manager Chtie Hartung statsl that this was not the final action on this annexation. The field lotot could not be verified at this meeting and asked Mr. Lynch to contact David Ellison regarding his questions. Mr. Ray Lynch spoke in oppositto, stating that a roction of the land in this petition belonged to h m. It appeared that the City wall trying to "slip in people's baci doors" with this annexation and he felt it would devaluate his face ;and. Council Member Stephens asked hci such of Mt. Lynch's property was included in this parcel. M... Lynch responded approximately 40 to 50 acres. Mr. Prank Martino spoke in oppceition stating that he undetetood that those speaking in favor of the petition were to protect the future water source. He did not understand the protection of the future water source as ci'tre'etle over 1.000 acres were already owned. If the City was goi.t; o- at the land, what protection was this to the water source. Notii!ni could be done on the river now. No building could take place n.: to it was all flood land and crop land. He did not understand what star rights were being protected. Mayor Stewart asked Mt. Martino to ~e*rain from asking questions and instead to make his presentation. Mr. Martino stated that he felt chat those residents in the area ought to have the right to know wh; Oa+,ton was proceeding with this particular annexation and that expls,.ation had not been given. The only thing he had heard was the protection of future water source. The City was not really protecting t;te future water source as they already had that and no one could cluch it. Dallas had owned the property for years and no one cok A even take water out of the river. He did not understand what via being protected and felt this was a guise for something else. Me. Hartino than. stated that as did not guess ha was going to get an a.swar to his question. He then presented memorandum from General Robirt J. Dacey which read: "We are of the opinion that theca is lack of authority to participate in the Gceenbal because of the scope of the project, authoritation is no broad enough to include this type of development." This has not been rescinded or changer. Mc. Martino stated that he had spoken the day before vith the Coe s of Engineers and nothing in this menorardus had been changed. He lad also spoken to Congressman Armay and had been assured that nothing had changed with the memorandum. Mt. Martino stated again teat his question was what was the City Protecting. He took opposititi to the City taking a strip in no man's land which would affect t11 of the property ih the area. There would never be any water of sewer service. Just as Me. Edison had stated, futuce developers would have to bring these services. No one was going to extend he water and sever but the owners would be under a taxable city annexation. The property owners woes opposed to it. Me. Martino asked for those persons in the audience who wets opposed to stand end stated that theta Jere hundreds who would turn out in protest to this annexation plan which was being promoted at this tits for no licticular reason. He felt it was an unfair position for the city to aka. Council Member McAdams stated that the was a little concerned because genenecaily, the City did extend fingers of annexation in ordec'to extend the oxttatscritoriai jucis(ietion of the City. This would give Denton some eights in the scam in the futuce as opposed to some other area. This strip did not nvolve annexing property belonging to those persons in attendance at the sooting. What damage did Mr. Martino fool would accrue ;i the city extending that strip 10 as to have gteater possibilities to the City in the future. City Council Minutes Meeting of dune 4, 1985 Page Twelve Mc. Martino responded that it was that[ understanding that this was not the and at the plan for the City for annexation but rather this was the beginning. The plan was also to go up and annex up to the Trinity River - not just the river but the property on both sides. He also understood that the annexation would go to the dam of Lake Ray Roberts, annex the dam and than. down Missile Bass Road. His property would then be surrounding by the City annexation. The next logical step than would be that everything that was within this area would become City. He understood why the city would annex land near highways to protect the development of buildit,ge, but there would not be any development or building in this area as it was all flood land. He did not see the reason or the necessity for putting him under a tax burden as this came up. Council Membec McAdams stated that she felt Mr. Martino was correct in stating that this was a beginning in the sense that someday theca would be additional annexation. Howevor, that might be to lasts from now. There were no plans for other than a finger to protect the extraterritorial jurisdiction at this point. Mr. Martino asked what extcatarcitocial jurisdiction was being protected by cpaing up flood land, a river which you could not get to or build on. This was unprecedented to this area. All other finger annexations had been on highways to protect the development. Theta was development taking place in this area. Aubrey city limits came directly to the other side of the civet on a finger annexation on !M 428. Mr. Baxter traland spoke in opposition stating that he vas opposed to strip annexation for extraterritorial jurisdiction. The City would be taking in someones property and they would have no say and would be told what they could do. This strip annexation was for that specific purpose and did not protect the water supply or serve any purpose. Me. Ireland further stated that he was a resident of the City of Denton and represented approximately 50 voters and 1 absentee land owner. The Mayor closed the public hearing. David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that one of the purposes of this annexation was to further define the northeastern boundary of the city, Theta were cities located within the total extraterritorial jurisdiction of Denton and although theca was not a large amount occurring, there was some proposed annexations on the pact of some of these adjoining cities. The City of Denton did not have extraterritorial jurisdiction agreement lines with all of the cities. There vas also a limited scale residential subdivision in the review process which was to be located between Rockhill Road and Wildcat Road in this area. Council Membar Stephens asked If staff would chock out the field notes. Ellison responded yes. Mayor Stewart asked staff to check on Mr. Lynch's question regarding this annexation and the 1984 annexation field notes. Mayor Pro Tea H3pktns asked for a map of the present zoning in this area. Ellison clarified that the purpose of this annexation was to enable ae..dittonal tutu[* annexations in the area of the Ctty's futtirs water aaurve. Crew motion, Hopkins second to continue the annexation proneedings. Council Msmbsr Stephens asked what was the date of final action. City council minutes meeting o. June 4, 1985 Page Thirteen Ellison replied that the targeted final action date was August 17, Another public hearing would be hold on June 18 and institution of annexation would take place on July 2. Council Member Alford asked it the information ou the field notes would be available at the June 18 public hearing. Ellison responded yes. Council member McAdams Stated that she would like to clarity for the audience that a motion to continue simply meant the process was still in affect; however, it did not mean any type of decision was made. The field notes were going to be checked before any action was taken. Motion to continue carried unanimously. 6. The Council cone:dared roval of preliminary plat and general development plan, of McDonnell Highlands Addition. Denise Sp!vsy, Urban Planner, reported that the tract of 39.S acres was annexed and :ouinq approved eatlicr in the agenda. toning approved was for duplex and general retail land use. The Development Review Committee and Planning and zoning commission had considered the plat and general development plan and had ricommanded approval subject to 2 conditions, Hopkins motion, McAdams second to ap7tove the preliminary plat and general development plan. Motion carried unanimously. 7. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contrac~,s tot the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or serviced; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. The following ordinance was presented! NO. SS-107 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordnance. On roll call vote, McAdars !aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford .aye," Riddlespeeger ways," Chew "aye," a;,d Mayor Stewart "aye." Notion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing tot the expenditure of funds tot emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitivs bids; and providing for an effective date, The fuliowing ordinance was presented- NO. a5-100 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAM EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams %aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "lye," Riddlesperget "eye," Chew "aye," and mayor Stewart ways." Notion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes Meeting of June 4, 1985 Page Fourteen 1 C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 136.S89 acres beginning approximately 500 feet east of the centerline of U. S. Highway 377 and south of Brusb Creek Road. A-11 David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported there was no new intocmation on this item. The following ordinance was presented: NO. SS-109 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT Oa PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 136.S8 ACRES OF LANs LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE GEORGE W. DAUGHERTY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 3S1, UENTON COUNTY, TEXAS: CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY: AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, Alford eecond to adopt the ordinance. on roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "ays," Stephens "aye." Alford "aye," Riddlesperget "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motton carried unantmously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 65.12 acres beginning 3So feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of U. 8, Highway 360 Eist and Geesling Road. A-13 The following ordinance was ptesentedt NO. SS-110 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS) BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 93.67 ACRES OF LAND LY1140 AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNT: OP DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OP THE M. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417, DENTON COUNTY. TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY: AND DECLARINO AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Stephens notion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll coil vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlespetger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service Ilan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 42.35 acres situated in the S. Huitar survey, Abstract 514, and beginning apptoximately 500 fast north of and perpendicular to the centerline of U. S. Highway 380 and vest of Match Branch Road. A-1S The following ordinance vas presented: NO. SS-111 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LANG CONTIGUOUS AND kDJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 42.3S ACRES 08 LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE S. HUItAR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. S14, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS: CLASSIFYING THE 4AME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY] AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City Council Minutes Meeting of June 4. 1985 Page Fifteen Chew motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye.m Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesparger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimousi/. F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service plrn annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 60.38 acres situated in the G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and beginning adjacent and east of Edwards Road. A-10 The following ordinance was presented: NO. 85-112 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A 14ACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DE")N, TEXAS. BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONUISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 60.38 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS ANr, BEING PART OF THE 0. WXLKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS. CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY. AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hoptins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote. McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Altotd "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart mays." Motion carried unaknimously. a. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place tot public hearings coacatning petition of Bruce R. West tot voluntary annexation of approximately 258.66 arras being part of the S. Myers Survey, Abstract No. 843, and the A. Miller Survey, Abstract 887, and beginning vest of Underwood Road, east of C. Wolfe Road, south of Jim Christal Road, and north of Tom Cole Read. A-21 David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that staff was recommending that the first public hearing be held on June le and the second public hearing on July 2. The following ordinance was presented: NO. 65-113 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TINS'XND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS. McAdams motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On toll call vote, McAdass "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens mays," Alford "aye," Riddlespetgot "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unantRously. H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a contract with the Texas Department of Community Affairs to receive funding for and administer the Tessa Rental Rehabili- tation Program. Jett Meyer, Director of Planning end Community Development, reported that this Contract would allow the City to receive $105,000 to be used tot tahabilitition to rental property. There would be no cost to the City and tk.s Community Development Block Grant staff would administer the program, The following ordinance was presented. u city council minutes meeting of June 4, 1985 Page Sixteen NO. 85-114 AN ORDINkN':E OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVING A CONTRACT MI':H THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF COV24UNITY AFFAIRS TO RECEIVE FUWtNQ FOR AND ADMINISTER THE TEXAS RENTAL REHIBILITATI0:1 PROGRAM, AND PROVIDING F02 AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Stephens action, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On toll call vote. .McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and mayor Stewart mays." Motion carried unanimously. 1. The council considered adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and Denton county Electric Cooperative, Inc. for the purchase of electrical equipment and facilities. Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, repotted that this was an apptoximAltely 9400 feet section of C04petatLve line which can along Old North Road from Kings Row to University Drive. There were approximately 3 or 4 customers served on this line by the Co-op. A ma or development vas going to be located in this area south of the Kings Row seam. In order to relocate the lines, it was more expeditious tar the Co-op to sell the line to the City than to move and relocate into other easements. A price of $1P,500 had been negotiated which represented the replacement cost of tte line. The following ordinance tide presented: NO. 65-115 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETNElN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DENTON COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATI1A. INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF 6LECTdICAL EQUIPMENT AND dACILITIES, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew mays," and Mayor Stewart "sys.° motion carried unanimously. J. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and the North Texas Commission toe developing and implementing a comprehensive marketing program for the North Texas Region. City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this Was a renewal of the City's membership in the North Texas Commission. The coat was $3,938 with the funds coming from the old RED Board account. The following ordinance was presanted: NO. 4S-116 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENT04 AND NORTH TEXAS COMMISSION FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A COMPREHENSIVE MARKETING PROGRAM FOR THE NORTH TEXAS REOtW11, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE' DATE. Riddlesperget motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. Council Member Stephens asked how mush money was left in this account. Betty McKean, Assistant city manager, replied approximately 116,000. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye,m Hopkins maye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlespocger ■aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart may$." Motion carried unanimously. City council minutes Meeting of June 4, 19as Page Seventeen 9. The council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the closing and vacating of that portion of San Gabriel Drive from its intersection with Angelina Bend Drive to its intersection with Piney Creek Boulevard, providing for the closing and vacating of a portion of Piney '.took Boulevard as described herein and providing for the reservation of easements. Council Member Stephens left the meeting. Denise Spivey, urban Planner, reported that this was a condition which was attached to an amendement to a planned development which was approved by Council. The condition was to remove a portion of San Gabriel Drive to prevent the access between the currently existing portion of Township ti and the portion to be developed as a result of the amending to the PD. The adoption of the ordinance would fulfill the condition so that the paving in this area could be removed for development to proceed. The following ordinance was presented: NO. BS-117 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DEN=N. TEXAS PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING AND VACATING OF THAT PORTION OF SAN GABRIEL DRIVE FROM ITS tNTLRSECTION WITH ANGELINA BEND DRIVE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH PINEY CREEK BOULEVARD: PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING AND VACATING OF A PORTION OF PINEY CREEK BOULEVARD AS DESCRIBED RUS IN: PROVIDING FOR THE RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOP AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins notion. Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye." Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Msyoc Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Stephens joined the meeting. Council Member Alford stated that it might be appropriate at this point to inform those in the audience that, on the adoption of ordinance, most had been under study and discussion for quite some time with public heating already having been held. O. Resolutions A. The council considered approval of a resolution authociting the City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of Housing and Uttar. Development a final statement of objectives and projected use of funds with appropriate certifications, as authorized and requi.wd by the Housing and Community Developuent Act of 1974, as amended. Jeff Mayer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported that it was time to make application to HUD for the use of COSO funds. This was an important year in that it would complete the recommendations which had been looked at for many years. The CDBG Committee had Let many tines to deliberate and had special assistance from a planning group on a proposed neighborhood center for southeast Denton. Aftet taking into ace-)unt these recommendations, commitments to HUD and the funds which were available, the recommendation to the council was: 1. $105,000 for continuation of the housing rehabilitation program; this was necessary as it was pact of the City's coweittment to HUD to continue to take the level of housing for low to moderate incoae people in the aces 2. $52,292 tot acchitectual design and engineering cost tot the construction for a recreational facility to be located it, southoast Denton; it was further stipulated that the City council minutes Meeting of June 41 1985 Page Eighteen southeast Denton area vas defined as south of East McKinney Street. east of Bell Avenue, north of Dallas Drive and Vest of Ruddell/Noodrov Lane. The committee vas vary specific as they did look at other areas but felt this area was the area of need and where the F,ost people were voicing the opinion that there was a need. 3. $75,000 for the acquisition of land for the southeast Denton recreational facility; this would not build the center but would give a signal to the neighborhood that, if the architectural design, engineering and putchasa of land, the center would be built 4, $30,000 for demolition and lot clearance S. $55,600 for paving and guttering 6. $40.000 for renovation of the Phot.nix Apartment The remainder of the funds would be user for aininistcation of the projects. The CDBG Committee bad workerl hard and the neighborhood had been very much involved. It would be mote difficult to prioritize requests in the future as the neighborhood had gtovn considerably. The Committee was ttying to see that the old proltzts were funded before new ones vote started. Council Member Riddlesperger stated this item pointed out the large debt spent the Council, in upreparing the various oteco■mendations to bring o to the Council. Ma•/or Pro TOM Hopkins stated that he appreciated the indepth study which the CDBG Committee had done. The following resolution was presented: R E S O L U T-1-" A RESOLUTION BY TUE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS. AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AS I AUTHO&IZED PROJECTED DEVELOPME APPRFPRIATE STATEMENT AND C FUNDS WIIT REQUIR D BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED. WHEREAS, the City of Denton. Texas, is concerned with the development of viable urban communities, including decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities; and WH%RRAS, the City of Denton, Texas, has a special ccncern for persons of low and moderate income: and WHEREAS, the City of Denton. Texas, as an entitlement City, has prepared, through a citizen participation process, a program for utilizing its first year entitlement funds in the approximate amount of $677,^18; and WHEREAS, the public hearing will have Seen held in accordance with the law; and WHEREAS, the Act requires an application and appropriate certification; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS. THAT: city Council minutes Hosting of June 4, 19B5 Page Nineteen SECTION I. The City Council of the City of Denton. Texas, authortzes the City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development a rant application and appropriate assurances U)t entitlement funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. SECTION II. That the City Council Of the City of Denton, Texas, authorizes the Director of Planning and Community Development to handle all fiscal and administrative matters related to the application, the Housing Assistance Plan and the assurances. SECTION III. This this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after Its passiuge. SECTIOSt IV. That the City Secretary is hereby authorized to furnish copies of this Resolution to all interested partids. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4th day of June, 1985. RICHARD O. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DZhTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMt DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTOE ET CITY OF DENTON, TEUS BY: Chew motion, McAdams second that the resolution be apreoved. Council Member Chew then stated that there was also $100.000 for improvement to Fred Moore Park and asked those in the audience who were in attendance for this item to stand. Council Member Stephens asked staff to keep an eye out foe grants which would be available once the land was acquired for the recreaticnal facility. Meyer responded that staff would look tot federal and state grants. Mr. John Tcavelle, member of the Packs and Recreation Boa•.d, reported that the coacacn of the board was the changes which would have to be made in the Parks Five Year Master Plnn. Another issue was when this center was completed, would the City have to build similar facilities in other areas of town. Theta would be special needs for small recreation center. The Packs and Recreation Board would like to meet with the City Council sometime in the next 2 weeks to discuss putential problem areas. Council Memb.c Chew asked if Mr. Tcavelle did not think 10 years was enough time. :Outheast Denton had been promised that once the money was available, this type of facility would be conetructed. He could not see how the Council could delay the action which needed to be taken. p ;rA City Council Minuten Meeting of June 4, 1965 Page Tweaty one Council Member McAdams stated that She Would d they lidisagcaed with the point. The council was not suggesting Patks and Recreation Board regarding their philosophy on cooperating with school h system. school Tand here building ata one rimeadaacSchool ind this within area; however, over the strenuous objections to the residents at the time, that school was closed. Theca was not going to be another school recreation. center as pact area. built in eT~ool would never be in o having of the s Mayor Pro Tam Hopkini stated that he felt theca vas great deal toe the gocceationi Boa detoy cacticular o elder the whole schemeiate times aPacks and to not forget the community center idea. On toll call vote, MCAd&ne `aye,Y Hopkins may$." tephens Stewart Alford 'aye," Riddlesperger ways, m "aye." and yor way*.* Motion carried unanimously. Council Member McAdams left the meeting. B. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing a tempotary concrete batch plant ark 10 Street acr(FX e tract located on the Wort`. side of East McKinney approximately 3,000 feet east of Mayhtll Road. Denise Spivey. Urban Planner. reported that Holigan Development Corporation had requested a permit tot a temporary concrete batch specific useepe104 rmit acre tract c place t for north rmobile e hogs EPark. Tneeplant would be used toe the purpose of mixing and pouting concrete needed for the streets and the pads foe the mobile homes. The plant would operate for a 6 month period only. The following resolution was presented: R E S -g L U T l -01i BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to Article 7A of Appendix 8 (the Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Otdinances of the City of Denton. Texas, Holian temporary concrete nbat hing nplant Corr a 2ariodonoteto exceedesit e(6) months on the following described property: Being 104.284 acres of land located in the Morreau Forrest Survey. land Abstract 4to ~Hm Henry SMillen, Co., Trusteeinby the deed recorded Denton County, Texas nd in Volume 5e9. Page 291 of the Deed Records of Denton County. Texas. Said Henry S. hiilet, Co.. Trustee Tract being also known as Lot I, Block C of the subdivision of Mocreau Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417. Denton County, Texas, as shown by the map or plat of said subdivision in said survey of record in Volume 50, Page 236 S. S of the TOXa 104 being noteepa ti u kclytd scribedCbynmates and boundsdas followsactes northeast, ciQht-of/vay n line of Farm to Market fence cornet 426 post being the southwest corner of said Lot 3. Block C of laid subdivision; THENCE north 00.57'52" east 2801.91 feet aloT.q the west boundary line of said Lot 3, being east boundary line of Lot 2 of said sudivision Millt Road whoa avetage ewidtho is SS feet. Saidisteel post li the northeast cornet of C of cornet being e. Block northwest afotesaid said subdivision; said Lot 2 City council minutes Meeting of June 4. 1985 Page Twenty-tine . wsca South 88.49'29• east 1445.37 feet along the south right-of-way line of said Mills Road to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northeast corner of said Lot 3, being the northwest corner of Lot 4 of sal.4 subdivision; THENCE Mouth 01008106" vest 2218.34 feet along the east boundary line of said Lot 3 to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northeast corner of a 15 foot access strip; THENCE north 89012'23" west 15.03 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northwest corner of said 15 toot access strip. THENCE south 0G"S9119" west 1355.47 feet along the west boundary line of said 15 foot access strip to a 3/4 inch iron pips in the northeast right-of-way line of aforesaid Farm to Market Road No. 426; THENCE along the northeast right-of-way line of said Farm to Market Road No. 426 as follows: 1. north S3"44127" west 245.60 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the beginning of a curve to the left; 2. northwesterly 386.13 feet along said curve to the left having a radius of 3078.96 feet, a central angle of 07011108" and a chord beating north $8159126" west 385.88 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the end of said curve; 3, north 62035100" west 992.60 feat to a place of beginning containing 104.28 acres of land. SECTION It. That this Resolution shall become effective Immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4th day of June. 1965. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAKI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: Council Member McAdams joined the meeting. Hopkins motion, Stephens second that the resolution be approved. Mayor Pro Tea Hopkins stated that this temporary batch plant situation would help to save the City's streets as the trucks would not be used to haul concrete into the development. on roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye." Alford "aye.' Riddlesperget "aye," Chew "aye,' and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. Council Member McAdams left the meeting. C. The Council considered approval of a resolution ratifying a deed With Mr. Anthony Scalise. City council minutes meeting of June 4. 1985 Page Twenty-Two Council Member McAdams joined the Meeting. Debra Dtayovitch, City Attorney, repotted that the resolution was to authorize the City Manager to execute a deed correcting a deed which had conveyed property to the City of Denton. The deed which was received in 1978 conveyed 108 acres; however, the City Lad only purchased 68 acres. This would allow the deed records to be cleaned out and tot a change of title to take place. The following resolution was presented: I R E S Q L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Denton purchased certain real property toe its sanitary sewer facility on July 7, 1978, from Anthony Scalise: and WHEREAS, the Deed received from Kr. Scalise dated July 7. 1978. and recotded in Volume 899, Page 786, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, contained an erroneous property description, conveying 108.05 acres of land instead of 68.0 acres as intended by both parties to the transaction: and WHEREAS, Mr. Scalise caused the Deed to be refiled in Volume 1169, Page 687. Deed Records, Denton County, Texas, October, 1982, to correct the legal description to show a conveyance sif 68.0 acres to the City; and WHEREAS, Kr. Scalise, through Plano Title company. has requested that the City confirm and ratify the Deed as teftled; and WHEREAS, the City paid for and continues to occupy only the 68.0 acres described In the Deed as rattled: NOW, THESEPORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, THAT: SECTION I. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the attached Ratification on behalf of the City of Denton, contttminq the Deed from Anthony Scalise as refiled in Volume 1169. Paqe 667. Deed Records of Denton County. Texas. SECTiO1~ II. The City Secretary is directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution, with the executed original :tatification attached, to Plano Title Company for recording purposes. SECTION 111. This Resolution shall be effective Immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4th day of June, 1985. RICHARD 0. STEWART. KAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK: DEBRA ADAKI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: City Council Minutes Maatiag of June 4, 19as Page Twenty-Three Hopkins motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, McAdams "aya," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Ridalespergec "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 9. There was no official action on Executive session items of legal matters, coal estate, personnel and board appointments. 10. The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: 1. Mayor Pro Ten Hopkins asked that staff provide a report on annexation A-22 and the 19a4 annexation discussed at this meeting in advance on the public hearing on June 18. The Council reco,,vened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. The Council then convened into the open session witb the following .official action on Executive Session item of legal: The following ordinance was presented: NO. SS-118 Ali ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SANDRA APPLLWHITE: AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EPFECTIVC DATE. McAdams motion, Riddlespergee second to adopt the ordinance. on roll call vote. McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye." R.Jilesperger "aye," Chow "aye," and Mayor Stewart "nay.a Motion carried 6 to 1 with Mayor Stewart casting the "nay" vote. With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned. RICHARD O. STEWART. MAYOR i CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY i I 1233q DATE: 6/18/85 CITY COUNCIL RS KRT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING PLATS: 1. Preliminary Plat of the J. W. Anderson Addition 2. Preliminary Plat of the Denton 20 Addition 3. Preliminary and Final Replat of the Montecito East Addition 4. Preliminary replat of part of the wainwright Addition and part of the original Town Addition 5. Preliminary and final replat of the Sanger Brothers Addition RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: FISCAL IMPACT: Respectfu4 s~te G. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: Denise Spivey Urban Planner Appro •d: W&Wes Jeff Meyer Director of Planning and Community Development 1030a CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18. 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of the J. W. Anderson Addition. Lots 1. 2, and 3 SUMMARY: This 1.9 acre tract is located on the east side of F.M. 1830 east of the intersection of Fincher Road and F.M. 1830. The property is located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction and residential development is anticipated. The Argyle Water Supply Corporation will provide water service and septic systems will provide sewer service to the tract. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat Al Denise S ivey Urban Planner 0915j • Y. Vi view J. SRUIT! BURV[t A - I!! 3 LOT / L AAOT 108WAe. i n► rM~ LOT r / t---l---+ • l18llAt. / , t4 r 0 LOTI ` 4 1.0000A/. /r ~raHxbon / VOL Ur Milt 1 Mi rv y Ip A ro Qrnf Rf. R L I _ ~M1f ~ • ! ird4f rlw.n r oporm, 1pow 1 O~rw' ~ e/► R#N 0wN[R/p[vE~.O►ER 1, w. ~iV 0t iN~N ~ . PLAt r't OW- • (.M A1. ; T I y 1. Y CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of Lots 1-7, Block A of the Denton 20 Addition SUMMARY: This 20.9 acre tract is located at the north side of University Drive approximately 370 feet east of interstate Highway 35N. The property is zoned commercial (C) and general retail (GR) and commercial/retail development is anticipated. City services and facilities, including water. gas, sanitary sewer. telephone, electrical, and solid waste area available. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval subject to the completion of the sewer.-,in,: north of Highway 380 and Hickory Creek. ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Roduced plat Denise Spiv Urban Planner 0919] r1Ym kill \ 'r` ~M~ f ~ ~ ♦r x ~ 1~ 'f f ~ 1 ~ ~ .ancr fW ~ ~ aa• I i yGM ! WAkW Gm n KPI RY P 10" MI[ 1MM imp i( \1 •a rtt fft c4 1' ~~R • i .Ib H~ra+...ta.•r ~fM•to Yf+um Dow M farm PH" M OM mGw;nA KN wilu" Wl O/NN U f.11f1 A'o 1 M tt t.y M ' ; '1~ \ •r Y1mJif OYT w s•. ~ of I d ! r. 3'r L • t t' it 1 ~ .✓..J. .r1 I' ~ Y V tt I, ~ ' ~ry f1t ~ _~J• 1 1 i IfY and iyp~~I+pUI~• L\ " i .1 ha. Gkf,iK 1 Ylac•1 f.~hl f01.4t MI / r 1YIY[KK :yK 1•R IYMWI RGi ' cc"E-C, ADOMON 1 / ~ w 1LOCt A • ~ ~ I ' :01w x. C" me 0"" OF boom ftla ran' i 16 + V•f1 O0'M~t ..H`~Gt.nv f ,y~ f HKIfIOH NA'1f H1RW ^G' ~7ii'It~ lY~ _ own" a nth. wrw D~~~•► ~ 1t~. rr1'W~~ ~ /m10m YMm I~ , ~rrr I~!/•Jf~l1f! ~I`8'i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the Preliminary and Final Replats of Lots 1-16 of the Montecito East Addition SUMMARY: This 3.2 acre tract is located at the southeast corner of Carmel and El Paseo Streets. The property is zoned single family (SF-13) attd agricultural (A) and residential development is anticipated. The r,::rpose of the ceplat is to remove interior lot lines and create one large lot. City services and facilities, including water, gaa, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid w.ste are available. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final ceplats RECOWENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the preliminary and final ceplats ATTACHMENT: heduced plat .tar Denise svdty Urban Planner 0917] ' •4 . ITI•C Y, n1A1 1 c+In er ;v NR. I /w PI L'., 1, ,No IrN .1wU a• 5W tAY;p M A 4.4 .4 ALllt "wT ! 1 " "'ea It T,k S. Ir III:: N'iIH, rbpK1 1'ri, till M DI Y'p1, AIrN q-X °•'lw Ina, /.rr Y1 1, rnt a }IIA i..r 'at V ILpL. 4u TIY.T .1 7 .f .bro~+•/`~ Oa ~nw A '.w Y. wnup rD )WfI r• Ya'rMN 11~I }d'! fml. Pf f./ 1111 D 1 10:1119 0111 I d 1 1L rd91i P YIN+U 110., to [ I lx )IIf prralY bl DI YI'11 bLNII, 1L5M. 111 p11E RIIL Ii ILLT p w AN Mal ♦ a I 1'eAI 491 a M 1/ M 11 YA•F I*, " 1 111. yay 11YY~t fppd L 'r M11. Y4' T'a1 M41 W111 01.1 L!1. to 4.Ynll Ra tl6T \pn Tl''rw, ~ yyy a1 n nla: 11 Twr L. TO II:NI,rNAt DI O ftllo INl[fi MIYat IF, Tp p 11 %n 111 % Nl "t k' IN ilc!Mti Ylft t Hs 11 1J 1 ,6 I~• / / at Irt ;L9 N 5 11 Ml 115b!-il It YNT 01 0,311 aiIp~ ,Tjl !MITI 1 (y / :YIAY ■*q Ir DI:Vto It .1YLHI 51144" [Y a "o, Ill f _ _ 'Jttr r Yu a a',Itam n 110, IJf fa•.. LI !0. 1.. I / MrM'1 s, Y„ t I A. ,A, n; w'1!, {0GMtl. LA 01 . sT A I V i•1 4.I0 1'JN1-tltya 1.I {PV ~.I/ AIrIb1~A I l~ / 'r eD.IW IV ! Ix fa .1V 1 ' I l 1 444 l1F1--~I All \ 1 I / +II - 1 ( !YLMIf,VN. II, N H. ~ N:. 1.' I a JIiTUlll .1 • ~i F - 1771 Jf~~' 1.wN rar 1 u a Y Ilx; _ ti 1 lNI0.1 Iru •r • J , / ' ~ • 141 . N / 111 M rr.ull A. x'I/I a 1MoV Af A : V.0.1 rl wM 14 w. M "Y V; o~ 1/rr-- f f I i TuA-1 11 tY WNW .I V Y9rp .I .K'a" II I C15'LA5 01 SaI,L1 TU' 1.v NN A T IPI / ~~I TMg1 ,ry Mt pl .111 At .!Y11112 fr1M111 fIq A VIVAIC5 01 1 n '.A/ 1.C.11: 1111 Ti aY :LA 5 w. 8!'.~~" 9~ r / / / g11 1 a I T",11 ?V V p Alll L V'.MI III Ia III We . p HVM I QI ~~~~y~ yI I/ •%'I AEI ~,`i / J-0 w up 41 , 1..'.u aM'lal ~f5/«' LFLI \ r rrlnt ' ra 11 Dr r 1•r r. fit A a NLAAf urt a I151rv 1 Y / 1 f_ II~~++ / 1 [ h.,~ b.~yp li. lan 1 AN A N 11 f 1 IV I •Itw M1l Hlalll 1 • f•. r II 1 1 DI11wY1 it, /.r- / 1 I fr«/ r : 5 r AKM M LLw w p: Yf ' Ili. 11 rl 1. 'r -I, ! '•M Nn LI r6 nLL.. /MN O i~ i lrjt IJ L1 fir \I t0.11 .M INN N'" Ww M twill nlMml X yr`- 3 ir. INV 1 r1!'I..rvv1 h, YnIA! War 1011 nn DIH YI V A/r Tpl wr al la ma I N rl'V 111 AS.1014 . IUN$ IIT 0P T.I a ..x IrIPL .-1 IN MYr J. .p / ( S l'uIY111C n':1 y al n... =i~ 1 .J/// ` r t yr «n rd rur, u. Ixr Ilnlr..wD lau.n L 's4146. / f 1 y %/j/ ~•1~'~ No' k14 WW'Al s u l5 •1 TI C a u ''"_rr rl r1.M. M OM[I► 154KE ,.1.1 a. I., I%run r«I I, IN. t11. If -Y a~ WUITY a OIX1ON,TEYA$ Rol. y4N, CA. u1, mrl 11ry'agll \:,1aan la• It. rn.A1 f" X J I l I LOT FIESCEMIAI Il5[ IIN 5. of f 1 M 1x1 II I$'% 0x.'1 %Vt 1 ....;lIN l • 1 1 1 . rl !I IKM1 YI .YP N . J 1111 M r rr Nr I,f 15. I'.. 1 l I t c I 1.V 01,,j M111A Ir 5 IV H . IN IrIrIS V ~ ` NMj' -A~ f l ~ toe YC ,[pall L "MII NH. 1'I vw It Y.... N.Y Ah,.rAl IN MIIA ToI NI 1.l .r ,J~~» /Y r V ;r}~J{•F pitlY~rlu>i'ti'Aw-jno .~Lt•11 ~5t• 'I J Il PV ~y1 lo"v I's cul"i, Ara V ~I rf1. pxr tprlf arY p, }Nr IIgIgU r`/\ .rt wino fill I. CUT V. YWI h, 1tlJMIq ISN It Iu IY1l A, Do A[Atn I • / if /tlrlr7 II L Ia[PUII }1115 Plat IA.w At AI AND KfYMtI I I }I'1lr / IL 111.1 f# To it a0p 1M/ INl IIA /IY5 /IM TUIYl1M Y[AI 80;m 11 SRX d"InA its so I hl N ITY If I fV Pill ilia IY YcWMKt YItY T01 e 1 / 1 OrDUAIt1.f Ot clT/ DI KYTUY. wow 111 6 1 • r.'." .r`5r f Lr-'-jy ,•Trlf~ •,iwidti'il~'lii.'1 hot ~sw , t • # REVISED HAMMETT 6 NASH, INC NEWMAN 9JWMf ~1 1. CRr Dots cOkSUITrdO tNd}I[LA4 E SURVCI'OR4 1A AI TO M CITY d WRION 1 tat ICN CMWV. TEAM DATt Itt 1.1004 Ar 11i1O OENTON, TEXAS n2o feI 1St! IN 21,RS _ R B C P/ 1 V 6 D MAY 3 11985 1 la•n ar nw L C ¢n\ CI DOFN [ N .41111, I. 14 X Y1+.a M ru Mtl " IF N 71.1 1 la rot t. Kllullr Y/:n u. rar110 t14 r1 )ps7 1 ~_r.SS ~,i, Irra+tL4[D M Is L[Ir "IT ^f I "T" IOLL rJI 11 Lrr O N r M'I OF p[til r Yf14 [+x .n•i\ [/~e F DUC rLw .ILI M NOVA N tYl YrTll DII ll VHMHI NNL aICLND44 4 Y1 1:4V, ILL Itle IV," CI MN r Ctl LtUI lM N INI m, OF 9"1 A "I 4. WMTRI?C ~ NA sow P, ,,y IIa t111D AS L f rO ltr + +li l'lll i'IG At iNf kllf l liri MEl 01 rNl Faf E' To ML RI ~ ♦ :MI I L.6 }42Yl a lPDltl 'a Alit Y Wr!",\1;i rl'PIl M oft' 11D t,t L•I!111 CX. I L PA= 1 09 IPOD uv It to Too ar to utrt ~rl11! of t4 t' HFen ftann IN/atm . ;1 rvmt mul" eJ %.It,, LL .14+'m It IFCLOA L5f I rlltlMr rr Awl w.r1C ILIT 70 u IA„a IIN la tU YE.ITa it: Nt+lY4t rI LL IUN 1 I Irrru• 1 T*m "TN IL M:LH a' AIKTta 71 SCO IU, t1aL µn at 541 I S i SIB 111 IT. e-vkf 4II,Tm-v Lr IV-D0LIT M w MIS, IIY: 1111{/Iy . • 1 •_1 tr' rrfht Mw Tf N `TCII~1 al 'Ir4 1: It, Drr,•I tali 1 Fn1aW1 VI I 1 ! 1~: ba.r' Illt N kI 1-10 ?IN la rxt kwtr I,r Nt-rt a4r fl Fa'/ a i6 tI1l1T• I i d~ li9w'I "T4 ar M,'r16 1r OF R1 It kK^NDI faq 1 r "..1 IN P t •II~~I 11;.rt !Vt LV al I1,'. rlaa 1 y + PI IINfr 11 I ~ 1 l/-~ •LwI IIY. LN 0. PL..NIS C aP1 r11 t} IIMf: 14'1 •Sl^~'T~ L11 i tl IIISiO I~ W rut rr AN r:4 14: ~~1 --1 rxn^I set TO rr 1. It LI al.' 1.1 . rlnu~•.r _1 l {.a{ i LQ~ I i 1x 4M Ti Lx IY HA) ...loll, l: tr rr.r 1 1"y1 W.} cr ov, 1 - I 'fY } / n.,.lK rtL1 ru OF l+"N r 111 • 1 I r{ 1 NrI J M{)R ISr W1f~[[ ` HfIMY L:'L [v 1 I'/• a'',11 frcrrUl alt} F t'I<rANLI. L'.r i 4 028 ACRES i /1// 7r 261Z.T{ai. {3D~~r/) Ilr.w tul T 4. I 'Y 1 lM.t LLKTY 11 I 1 ♦ r. lL. .1 tl.!4N'r4 YI•I a n11TM;1 U I. R Ill? r AI I x l n, (T µII-L,,A( Iv!•~ r If xl a •l 1MI NYI . I j t /II, J..1 N:I TN E 1... . t[r. El sr +I •T L p .uwl ^ iMbrs ' 1 11x9 E l c ;1 1f/B5 i ~'r j}~7\\ ~•rl 1..p relt m I I.: •1•i.l ar l111 \ L a..Xls. LL. eu I 1 I { I /7R f• u+a. FpsTA iI a..:-T L-"' j 4Y, / ICY TN[urcq 1. "III V rl re, it I'LlI.Il z vMf 1. IWrt r r rl.a•. •vnl .ITT 1 L1. xr l,lrt.• Iff, 1 ` f/ A / P'I rL., 11 k1 0:A-e rP •U It H Uq I. / xI L'r n 1 xt. •.1 { ! • 1 1 I /1,~ W P FID111 I1 NI ^I I*•tr, tI14 INK M N . LMl I j 1 1f, 1•t hl M.1 Klt Ntl l' ell I, +nll }1 I11rI r\ 4Ia UK I,rr ! 1x141: IV I OF It 7L.fi tri itivl; I I ~93a 1 • ` t ' ,l I i 1 S~ Y4r1 Vr R+[l I+ r 1 • 1 / 0{r(~ Su%°yENr4tfMN1 'L4;\ w NOT f IL _ i ;•1/ 1 ; i i^/ 1}ir yet. LI rF r1• r c - lf.tf •Y ur nxllt III ra 1'I 1, O o, lla Frt V• t 1 LLLRRRIIIr Iw+\ . III'I• to bl L\:X LN rill tY l fI T. `41 1 LI i11 1[t -f Ifr Iq g i' 1+1 i.r 1 1 1T I, rbin lllf I'S IN NI N ..r FL IL CLIrp-f 1" LYtY Y[ 14Ar q x4 E J 0 -1, 11S ~ i, 1Nf rTa m RIY' r IrT Nf rIU}^.a Miff 1411111r[I PIP •r7 If tNlr•1. I1 .1, J: Y: ~ .7~1 I+tr I'Nrra rl rexr n.w Fra oL ,y nc[ T.u >al rv r r ..1•S-*~ . I~ irYui'iuii i["iuriG'11r >i a~.~c:«:In t ffl ? e rZ ~'rN'1F1 11P jr 1- :rlrr I; LetTG'I LLrTn IC.tA 1~~1} ~~I~_p I•wN•- IILII SNll$ Ntr al telFt rll+l rlll I1 1-•/ f 6,, D.•I. Ik1 No elf, TNLI 1. LUr f. NNHTI. afr, I/i11ID IYIL1f k'1'L Lo CIl•11 1 L,~ {il~~ (1.111 f4 IN.11 1 rlrllllr MI1 FLAT IhM Y a[rL4L lXn b' VI4T} M1 IYlrtf OF Tor 1.411D. too tvt to, Lonn IIr1 IMVN MIXI^I Yb! - .I} I 10. . IT 0"'t 1110ta ft YIIgNUt klKIR31V/ Ir KTIIUALwI Ltu IM 414 • {I?:R { DUINatN11 01 trl tiTr D[ IIRW. REVISE1122] FINAL PLAT =NSYNAN ~1BOMSiON l,~~ HAMMETt 6 NASHr WCSq TM Off of "w(PI tKC DNr 6Q gATNrI Eit~NEEP4 E SUNYEvCAS U1 Wiurr, tt W tENT6N. 1E0AS 1`620 rn{ IY1 p~T(-{r.111009 of MAY t I{{f - v, MAY 3 1 1985 Rf"PtiVP.D CITY COUNCIL BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary and final replats of the Sanger Brothers Addition, Lot 1 and part of Let 2, Block 2 SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.4465 acres situated at the northwest corner of Eagle Drive and South Elm Street. Phis tract is more fully described as Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Block 2, and shown in the William Loving Survey, Abstract 759, Denton, Texas. The property is zoned commercial (C) and an expansion of Brisco Tire Co. is anticipated. City services and facilities, including water. gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, ane available. The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary any !ina',. replats RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the preliminary and final replats ATTACHMENT: Reduced plats Cc", L ah108vu Cecile Carson Urban Planner 08131 iIA" n/ mks fl ...'T .,1 i40n. It rK "af. 1. to t 1. IfI w tK LrKa " t LNIt .,I n.rl is MI 41111M "m well', I"lU(t 1\4. t lM w IOl1" l4 af-Im. Itul. { HIK ul, w 101 I Mt ful 141n1 AM1I 1, al M tar IN Poll 410;11 4 VI M1 It" 61 Lrmal, n1I,.. as mom " Ifa FJI UL4010 V W%I 4/. 1i1 AM. OUl IV7h bP ftfnl. . reui, A" "m Wt KbIl'"Yll M+11011 I. 1141+x. j• 114111111E tl 1+1 Oa nal\1 . oen.I M 411 bl l Oa no faT tl\ni .4 YM II I1tI Pl I4e frI Kim M tI4 k 111 M No 4ri Kill law1 W not I.e. taws N 0. Wort lat a4aflat Is vrit" 1„r, 14;4 411, Ptl 0 `II 41"LAn ~W ntlnr "I'M; r.Lt1 IMII IJ Wulf 11 Puff, 11 m Kit a rFLCr J16 LS J/1! ,r"a . sahp 1741;1 ITI1u mwo Ii .VamR [Me nccl . 4 Y.•... (tuff Of i ' a rcm tit, au 17(17n to aefne clam", lull In to y 4.-fl S Ij~~jr/f~ I a I I 'ft Tl r. (f t4 t4e; !1 71 Ito" etrit Lai- a rllllrf 14 I N.i Ptrl 1e -11 t• mR "AI-a" - M Kq aKft-Y P 10 v fill" IUt ITIII u \ AD I P &A t IhI I1fwf Inn 1t I4dr11 t/ flt if SILO" +1111 I r9/C r N. t _ = i-17(1• r~ una fun M.1 W A1111 }KFa1 17 t ITSTWI Of IN.I 114 J11/1.4 IIIt 7V 10 IMi Itt A• lm filNt} of, 1111" 14 r~( .nHt I"n O6.1r.1 111 .(111 aC(t 111.11 q.- I VM a.' f • . Lf4.IP ; s-c.•w~'. r. _ - If '.MVC1 ■i1 !i CtrH\t tf it 41tM" Nt.U IF 111.E f.f nofi Pl ml W of l'4 11111 w11 t "Al" f lei a lit, t0 tw MA" W W.'PIC r tA•Ugl - ' I b -9 ` 4 tt1f. 14 LVp. 14 1%.. % uauM 1411. npY ral al nMi !ar 1«11 Mt N 7Ia4 TBrq,: 'J wl.n ff. w y1 4 , . 111./. I. JAI 1 S. Y14n. R 4f11LP r t MIS n/Lt r••• r..,ti w1/ 1If[r . f 1x1 j "14.t11IK M4 ""it Otb Mtl I in N lli 1 4 i.1/ (Y►I. y• ~I I .v1 t t ti • I I0 1 V lM M40 J. of 1» 110 ♦i.l. 41~IIIIC 1J 11 a~!~ r 4 11.4- ,a+. 1• i fl~l ' a i/nc r4., 14pne i.( fi.ImL, A"14"01~Iiq %ft I. 4"I• ry r 1/I f• t / 1 V r 1 el ( 0 1 f I q1" W "1a4 11 f 1..\4/.I1 _ f , J' a I" i• ~Y l ~ 1 '1 III W. IK vawalrf,}tl 0 W r/a IO t1 wt to 1 4611 t " If1 Oran NO Intl 'tar •1atCCat ae4I.QJ .•'i' ! , 1 1tf 1. MItA, l.tw M -111 9 IN If1 /leLf /1011 ~ ~ a t• r ^ 4 / Pr1 of ertnarP n, POP n.-;olna ctsmwtn, w 1 rr 1 , • ' , Of ! I' xlfvtlt.41 " M 1111} K lta, vItl lP IR M I'll r4j •L V \ : V 111014 M1 11.11 Olt.rlllrf .wM w 1141,1 awe to M CAP* t" MO 11 IY llRlp • f F fell • (+1p - 3 ` f ' - .I1tt LION'S III nn w Tr of ar 1 Tit :I 1 . t3iri '!I'I1 tr N IIN 14 "I". .•-r. All It 10 wt.nrti . rnrn¢rn F t:J t" 1811 Poll" 01 M11 "1Nmr N C+ T.I. 1, N.( N. 4M IttlTfif ►Wh#tow 114,11" 1011. IRS "at" alit" ?w I /1LIMl1 Tia 147 1 IIOt a at Tat us teeun t-41fn w IK use of lot Ral J ~-tlel 0 f" IA 1111 tlpN TP1n. 01IIII Rrtl WWI % Of HIMRAL Arn II AgltrPl1 ~ nT 14 O01glfaRt! t~ ~ 4A I i + TV . In " 14 Ir ern... - ~ 11ff[peett ,P ~ r ",,ON 'ttst mot f4 7 ` r4 fti % / . . • 4/rNCA/Ir♦ 1Y11tU flu{ / PKLOAWAtl PLAT -r n t BLOCK t of ale tr HANK RADIO INCRA ptPlAr et LOT o t1w of f ALOTWOR 0411 r7.nws - LIe ~12/5/95 eONlULr1N~t1rGNt[Rf dU11KY 011S ,aewl114 sAOfNKA =IV0901 .«.IUrnLn «.a$9 ps ' K ittAf 1 !O1 101 Ier+ rLN ktminISmhW cowl. itIAI N~ M IS; 1 1iall N nut u roam N Nord tl Matou&. 1, lrt 1. lalpd w M pall p 11.6161 met Mal 11 rR MILLION t IfC want. lrlwq 111. rlh 40111 room M RMF+. 111411, am «IR &L r IK / I aN W} M 1. 11e[1 Or N td nata 1101 apli ld as 1n or actual; N 41.Y Ru., la x~ K M fro! alt 1■ lv-. 1r. P rat In. 1401 attpp w fforta 4Its s 1n, flu., in Fit Moats rYilfalaPLr xWel Yf1/q 41 10.4MT Melplrz at Tilt ",four fpRa r Lr► W t p td IIdM1 rI-.n~p Ma+ of MIJ Mtn 14 «1R IN 141 NIa1 to M W u/1 tClf/l « tear 1141, rn«f A Ialal, M Isola to W6041 IMt. ta.l u/. no Yl + fKdM Mat =010 f0.'11r1 t slf alt n ■I rfr t mom o pa t 1111(1 µ6 P. I a I 0 Motel wIll,n► rut M1 Irs to r M K tell lilt I , ai 14rf 11,, , spats n iftses t 180. P Rot f 1 r M 10 ► I K1 111. Rls rfnN of Notes ea [aaan, tlloral I twm swim II NCIItf ll ■pwm „Kiel 1161 a - IIiIYCI « 1+1.71111 Yl' to l9 WI ill I ftap[L p M Well mmet -p 14141 N f«R sv ffp11 J I.q1 tICaYV III, t111[T tt \ Mtft 1Rn It [leant IT ■ttllm .s 90com am 1 ►f'f~ - / aUOC Nt111G1if nt ■RYn I. aat/trttM 14,1 RIt / fill R to Isa Fit, at IM la ow7m « form tts .tort toga tKWAf 111 A* ICU set", : arr. Igrrt w . I i 1 1RRt van n a moll 11 ■lr'n it l SKMPW A 11Mat rut o m ntt « ASEAN Metal 1 naR1 L- - - { t aLMi IN Von i Po + o' IF.r M K Rut « asIMw no Malati 1.M1. rp1 N LM. d ItaLt,R sa not. 1 1 , a'fI tltatlMt ttN Rip Ms IT TWO all 0", ~I f. . t teal. 1, Jrs t. "Iran, as tum rode tan brain I 1111 :Marlrl I I. O start P Mf "a or aw no. all1 K Pool 11 ,R in « lMtas, fna,. M « a«It In14R N 1 'r Id nOtt n1 IMIRt I" ;"It" r tatONR1 ,r.l ~7 1~ li 1 "rum. 1n .c1 roe 1~ 1 BLOCK . to 2 ; ;1;t ii, a al.h r.r, 91491411 N f"Al AM 11 prig at 1 ' I ly ; 4/111I1 R. too rmnlt'mo 4f! "KIC N M is ! I •I O un 1/111 Mm 1n11 M nn v oommm It ovum or 8 Ir 1 JKt 1. 1111 scat. 14n Is I. air 7 111 "ON 1411 II} r II ; gM• is sYftlw"m tumn4 rung"". w L a y 1 ►IOJKkmm n R Rai 0 twwrw ?4 too he it V r t ru■/NI Ys m■f 11tY1♦,~t MRn tMraM aM it is 1 r I e Mal" 111N16 1Vfl1e I - ~ ~ a_ . tW Nsr • 114 o• f! 1-- - - uR■ aetr w mar ap +ea w sum Pill -E- -EMaaE QRN1 - - - -~tt - - STIR" ovitli ii kWiw Vntr 1101",4'1 to l I It1Un w A - lip Mp Ir1 11 nt11 Rtpnh \ - PAST. 1. un R wAft". go-*N% ' MMatlpt ~Z b'r m- 1111. r natal d111n rut 1 srw "to Ito[ ('f /M r rrrl M MOAVI *oft p 11: LWS M 1p1 1 F ` m Ilp Pill I11M IN1M om tots! 1Mr p WIN! I 1W 41 / 4. '(rf W Ml elm ofnilow. of t!/t..f Milo M 11ptLlls IT ct 1~ ! ,e { tom;: 141:1+; r:rr: rlAl ants IM / Nftq \ 1 b on r►t1 l • 3 anon 11111 ism / ut w L BOA M ITT !a j WI C s K~►+~T it nor ~ ~n ~ &I ILM t d r+ cn c"SULTIIN Doom M L VA1tV0111 aamtaH all ►1I InnlrlttM ld M rtR fan 6111/roRS IP !/6/85 t t ►s/ II o t, •wiiettall,ttuH Nr r CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary replat of part of Lots 7 and 9 of the Wainwright Addition and part of Block 28 of the Original Town Addition SUMMARY., This 2.25 acre tract is located at the northeast corner of South Locust and East Prairie Streets. The property is zoned commercial (C) and commer- cial development is anticipated. The purpose of the replat is to eliminate six interior lot lines and create one large lot. city services and facilities. including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste are available. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary replat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the preliminary replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat QL ~k ~ u Lt Denise Spivey Urban Planner 09181 r, 2 "mm Y ya t 11 ljjAG a A Il1C COMMERCIAL 2 E VOL. 0 PO 232 CAIGiNAI TOWN D< NTCN eLa x ; 9 YrluNYrPoWfT AOpTK1N ;II LOT No COMMERCIAL ZONE S i~ 1. LOT 9 F i° 211.0 r BLOCK c LOT 1 I R CCY.MERC,AL ZONE r f , +os.eo 1v,Y1 I I ~r I LOT E n COMMERCAL ZONE r ' 0'D II l+_ .ti~~ ~ X11 rcXNE~inL I ~ II 1. II I,, I ; T t I - gAlf `PRATRi a T-so Plot + I , 085 J , PRELIMINARY REPLAI VICTORIA SQUAAF 109 t Ae. 0[tN A REPLAT Or PAAT of "A IOT. 1 t IN INAIN46IGHT ADDITION T PART Of ,R.r1 t OLOCK 28 , OM04AAI TOMN Of 01410h T WILLIAM LOVING BNAM A • I" city B CCIMITV Or QENTON, TWO OWN[R ` JACK BELL I y'`. DATE: 05/18/85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ZONING CASE Z-1744 REC91MDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its meeting of May 221 1485 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1744 by a vote of 5-1. SL'141ARY: This is a request for a change in coning from the planned development (PD-41) district to the general retail (GR) classification on an 11.2 acre tract located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 1,500 feet south of East McKinney Street (FM 426). BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that retail zoning was consistent with other approved development on Loop 238 even though this proposal violates several Development Guide policies. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the general fund. Respect 1L ubml to 1 0 A41 G. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: kf-V~,~ n atw~ Denise Spi sy Urban Planner Appr ed Jeff Meys Director of Planning and Community Development 12278 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL "i To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1744 Meeting Date: June 18, 1985 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Clark Brothers 8325 Walnut Hill Lane, WS Dallas, Texas 75231 Statue of Applicant: Owners Requested ACLion: Change in zoning from the planned development (PD-41) district to the general retail (GR) classification. Location and Size: An 11.13 acre tract located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 1,500 feet south of East McKinney Street (FMS 426). j Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; PO-41 (single family attached, general retail) South - vacant; C, Li East - vacant; PD-41 (multi-family, floodway/open space) West -Vacant) PD-41 (single family detached) j Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as moderate i;3tensity. SPECIAL INFORMAT?ON Drainage: See attached memorandum from Jerry Clark, City Engineer, Utilities: The nearest existing water li;te is an 3 inch line located along the north side of East McKinney Street. A proposed 20 inch water line will run along the west side of Loop 288 parallel t-i this property. An 18 inch sai&.ary sewer running parallel I (Casa Z-17441 Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) I I to Loop 288 across this tract and a 21 inch line on the east side of Loop 288 provide sewer service to the property. Electric, telephone and gas services are available to the propert}. Transportation: The site has frontage or, Loop 288, a state highway and primary major arterial. The approved planned development concept plan shows that this tract is split by a proposed collector street. ZONING HISTORY On October 19, 1982, the City Council approved a mixed use planned development (PD-41) permitting general retail, single family ittached, single family detached, multi-family, and floodway/open space land uses on a 60.05 acre tract located at the southwest and southeast corners of the East McKinney Street/ Loop 283 intersection. ANALYSIS This tract, a portion of the above mentioned planned develop- ment, is located in a moderate intensity area. This moderate area was increased in size in 1982 when it was given a size bonus for diversified land use which is consistent with Denton Development Guide policies. The density/intensity standard for this area will not be violated if this requ•rst is approved; however, several other factors should be considered in the evaluation of this case. The size bonus for this area was granted because the proposal contained diversified land uses (single family attached, single family detached, multi-family, and general retail) that con- stituted a community unit concept. Approval of general retail zoning would eliminate a portion of the multi-family area of the planned development and defeat the purpose of its creation - diversified land use. Fii'teen (15) acres of general retail zoning is already a part of the planned development. It is difficult to justify the need for additional retail zoning in the immediate vicinity. Unrestricted rieneral retail zoning does not allow for the Lroteetion of adjacent properties. Buffering and strict site ~I (Case Z-1744) Page Three ANALYSIS (continued) plan control provisions, vital to any plcnr,ed development cannot be guaranteed by,this proposal. The curre.lt planned development provides for a living screen or six (6) foot masonry wall. to be erected where aenerai retail areas abut low density residential areas. These items cannot be required with this proposal for unrestricted general retail zoning. The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that retail zoning was consistent with other approved development on Loop 288 even though this proposal violates several Development Gude policies, RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its meeting of May 22, 1985 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1744 by a vote of 5 - 10 ALTERNUIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Memo from Jerry Clark 3. Approved Planned Development Concept Plan 4. Start Report Z-1540 (PD-41) 5. Property Owner List 6. Reply Form Totals 7. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of May 22, 1985 0870j I i i I II Yrv 1 , I _ .L.. PO-73 1 lr "'•"~'i, 1 I P D' 9' I L 1 ' J L 1 - it 11, PD 60 i _ A J6 r-77 777 j 41 -S- 172 i---- ' _ 1 ~ ~ 1 1 r 1 i~ 1~ I 1 ~ 1 t t M F MF-I ELI I : ~ t ~ 12-1744. PC a r ' f ~ ' r- ~ 1 \•`.~~~i.~ liaurr u-~rr.r br.. ~.fr.~.~ CJ-15 P Pa 55 r % +r 7 7-r CITY of ir.TNTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL EU!LDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEDHONE (817)566.8200 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 15, 1985 TO: Denise Spivey, Urban Planner FROM: Jerry Clark, City !'ngineer SUBJECT: 2-1736 and 2-1744 Both tra%ts have their southern boundaries on Pecan Creek. An estimate of 33% of both properties is within the 100 year flood plain. Pecan Creek is to be left nttural az per the 300 acie LI tract. This means all floodway land shall be given to the City of Denton after it has been cleaned to a maintainable condition. Both tracts have some drainage requiring improvements running north to south through them. Detention may be required for both tracts unlees an overall detention concept is developed into Pecan Creek. Thoroughfares should be consistent with the 300 acre LI tract but the City has no revised concept plan that reflects the overall proposal. Tte thoroughfare plan shows a collector street running east to west through on the north boundary of these tracts. Access to Loop 288 will be strictly limited so a good collector access street is a necessity or service type roads should be requited now. The widening of Loop 288 to four lanes from the Golden Triangle Mall to Highway 380 is in the Texas Highway Departments five year plan. Sidewalks will be required along Loop 288 and all interior collector streets. GQ~- J Y &SIAC er is 40288E SITE PLAN ~•'ETRppLEX EQUITIES t0r M GENERAL RETAIL, L..4 rSr DISTRICT GENERA r . PLAN LAND USE R E T AIL 10.18 no. OD STRICT 41e :.i ra... •:.1 ICMt N ~I t; •l.IS J reo, . .l ("r?~ f•ar. n},f.L'•.YLr l.St " 1.4? t: •iy O H )OL! I I:.CI atCSr! MULTI-FAMILY /doe SiN;'.E FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT 's, OAUL'il-FAUTLY V ro~;NlLI ;'Jr.t~ a~,l+a1 ATTACHED j h4° so DWELLING 0 ISTRfCT c 0 • - 0'A'EL.ING DISTRICT Qze, c~ee .10.080. 1 a.~.,ts+•I su~.r, 18.10 eo, iN 13.TS so. y 'oo SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED r MULTI-FAMILY I! DWELLING DISTRICT 2.42 !o: OWELLINO DISTRIC . 10.26 so. o MOLT -FAMILY # ?Al ac. OVIEIII JC DlSTQ M000HOCOllIM4Slott1' ICT ffSINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 3.00 ec. WELQNO DISTRICT 100•,tAR OrtR ultt 10.34 eo_.aa eo • 1o.ea se. , . to OLWr.01 ryPtr s)v Ct y PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO TFE CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Pouncil Case No. Z-1540 Date: October 19, 19a2 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Fred H. Deal Denton 288 Associates 3624 Oak Lawn, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75219 Status of Applicant: Owners Requested Action: Change of zoning from agricultural (A) classification, to planned development (PO) classification. Beginning at Southwest and Southeast J corners of East McKinney and Loop 288 and extending southward approximately 2115 feet along both sides of Loop 288. Size: 60.7 acres west of Loop 288 52.18 acres east of Loop 288 I=. acres total i Existing Land Use: Predominantly vacant or agricultural uses and one single family residence. ~ Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: East of Loo 288 North - Foxwor -Galbraith. vacant, single family residential; LI, Agricultural South - Vacant, agricultural, Pecan Creek; LI East - Heritage Roof Tiles; Welding Shop, mini-warehouses; LI West - Loop 288 Z-1540 Page 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (Continued) Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: West of LooP28_8 North - Phillips 66, Piggly Wiggly, Dairy Queen; General Retail (GR) South - Single family residential, i Pecan Creek, vacant, agricul- tural; Agricultural (A? West - Single family residential, 1 agricultural, vacant; Agricultural (A) East - Loop 288 Denton Development Guide; Area is designated is Moderate Intensity. i SPECIAL INFORMATION Physical Characteri.tics: Approximately 21 acre-ii of this 112.88 f acre tract lies within the Pecan Creek 100 year floodway which is located aloig the southern edge of the prop- erty. Approximately six (6) more } acres of the interior property is sit-1 uated in the flood plain. The devel- opment proposal reserves the floodway and flood plain areas as open space. Vegetation consists of large trees in concentrated areas throughout the project site, but principally in the Pecan Creek area, and grass. Transportation: This property has immediate access to Loop 288 primary arterial) and East McKinney secondary arterial), i Y i.' a y r _ ..r r~. •,d z-1540 Page 3 I SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Transportation: A collector street which is generally (Cont d) consistent wit.! the approved City of Denton thoroughfare plan is included as part of this proposed planned de- velopment. This collector street is shown to extend through the praper'y to serve minor streets and direct traffic onto East McKinney and loop 288. The intent appears to be to minimize points of access onto Loop 288 in order that the thoroughfare can function safely in moving vehicular traffic. Public Utilities: Adequate electrical, water and sewer service is available for extension to + this site. ANALYSIS ~ f This 112,88 acre tract is undeveloped land primarily located in an area designated as a modorate intensity center. The total tract is di .ded into two parcels, a little less than equal in size, that are separated by Loop 238. There is an existing res- idence on the project site and the abutting property both east and south of this property is zoned light industrial ELI). The major intersection has a lumber and supply company in the north- east corner and a gasoline station and convenience store an the northwest corner. Multi-family (MF-1) development lies further north along Loop 288 and single family development and a Piggly Wiggly store exist northwest of this site. This request for planned development (PO) zoning represents an attempt on the part of the property nwners ±nd petitioners, to design a land use proposal which conforms to specific and gtn- eral policies in the Development Guide regarding mod%rate a,~- I tivity centers and the planned community concept. Individual land use areas or components of the planned development will be I ~ r^.. z r,~x.<` ,fit., oar; s. •Ci .r :e 2i 1T r T.-h540 Page 4 ANALYSIS (Continued) commented on with respect to their conformity to specific and o-erall policies; however, it apoears that the petitioners have generally succeeded in devising a proposal that complies with Denton Development Guide recommendations arl policies. When proposals of this nature are being evaluated, there are some questions and issues that are subject to differing interpre- tations. This is particularly the case in noderate intensity areas because they are somewhere in the middle of high and low intensity areas, and they are written to strongly encourage diversity in land uses. In terms of diversity, it is felt that this proposal is eligible for the recommended size bonus prescribed by the Development Guide. The size of moderate activity centers should be P im 30 acres to 250 acres with the centers proposing a mixture oti land uses. It is suggested that a moderate center that encourages diversity and the community unit concept be towards the higher t end of the acreage range, whereas, a specialized center (e.g.' predominantly commercial) should he towards the smaller end of i the acreage range. Again, the interpretation is that this pro- posal generally qualifies for the size bonus because of its di- versity and adherence to the community unit concept; however, the one actor regarding this policy which does not make this proposal totally acceptable is the fact that the property own- 1 ers' admitted intent in seeking rezoning is speculative in na- ture. There are do indications that any immediate development is proposed, and the development guide policy 'regarding size bonus for diversity recommends that such judgements be made on proposed development that will be realized within five years. Acknowl:dging the fact that it is extremely difficult to antic- ipate wnen, and how, development will occur, the guide further suggests that the areas b ief ting from the size bonus be sub- ject to reconsideratsan (back-zoning) to a smaller sized center if development pl.ns are not realized within five (5) years. Z-1540 Page 5 ANALYSIS (Continued) Intensity is criticzl in that moderate act-rvity centers should not be allowed to exceed area standards and in reality evolve into high intensity or major activity centers. Strip commer- cial, retail, or other unsightly and inefficient concentrations are discouraged and can be avoided through the use of site plan- ning, buffer zones, open spaces, and aforementioned mixtures of land uses. An intensity study (see graphic analysis of land use intensity analysis) has been conducted and the proposal is with- in the area intensity standard; however, as a footnote, policy and decision makers should understand that if approved, this zoning would practically utilize all of the area intensity, Unless standards and policies are changed in the future, this limits the ability of additional contiguous areas to comply with intensity standards if retail and other high Intensity uses are proposed, A reduction in gross acreage reserved for general retail (GR) land uses to a meximum of 6 - 10 acres would be a plus when considering future -•elopment proposals. Designating some of the proposed general rerail space for office or some other lower intensity sse is another desiraile alternative. Adequate open space and transition is proposed as part of this development, therefore, retail or commercial strips and undesir- able concentrations are basically avoided. The general retail area totals 15.15 acres and is divided by Loop 288 so that 10.18 acres are proposed at the southwest corner of Loop 288 and East McKinney and 4,97 acres are proposed ac the southeast corner of Loop 288 and East McKinney. A 10.16 acre single family attached residential aria backs up against the southern boundary of the 10 acre general retail area and extends aloe the g west side of Loop 288. This aree is pro- posed for the development of attached condominiums or townhouses and would act as a buffer between Loop 288 and the detached sin- gle family residential area on the extreme western portion of the property. The general retail area and the single family attached area should be buffered through the use of landscaping and/or a screening wall or fence, Density should be limited to 10 units per acre in the sinqle family attached area, i I GRAPI'IIC• EXAMPLE, ZPage 6 -1540 OF LAND US Re INTENSITY ANALYSIS 'DEVEL'OPMENT GUIDts ANALYSIS OF A MODERATE, j PROPOSER DEVELOPMENT STANDARD MAXIMUM STANDARD FOR TOTAL 28,300 ( 2,849 - UNUSED CAPACITY ANATYSI STUDY AREA TRIPS TRIPS CAPACITY ODERATE INTENSITY 250 17,701 TRIPS GENERATED STANDARD TRIPS PER ACRE TRIPS 9Y PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT I 620 TRIPS RESERVED TRIPS FOR VACANT LAND 11 ACRES OF EXISTING ' RETAIL ZONING TO NORTH STUDY AREA (FOXWORTH-GALBRAITH, BOUNDARIES SHELL STA'T'ION, DAIRY I QUEEN) THROUGH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TERMINATING SOUTHE CREEK TO THE STUDY AREA 113,2 ACRES 7,150 TRIPS SIZE (SIZE BONUS FOR I TRIPS GENERATED BY DIVERSITY). I (11 ACRES) EXISTING f 1 #Nn flop ' v . s is iq Hr ,AV.x r Z-1540 Page 7 ANALYSIS (Continued) The high density •asidential area constitutes the predominant land use on the portion of the property adjacent and east of Loop 288 and south of East McKinney. A total of 34.85 acres of multi-family land use is projected for the planned development, and if limited to 22 units per acre as suggested by ',,he peti- tioner, approximately 167 units are conceivable. The Develop- ment Guide recommends moderate concentration of apartments (500-11100 units) in this moderate activity center, thus, this proposal consumes 3/4 of the recommended standard. As in the case of the intensity standard, the apartment concentration is near what is recommended as a maximun, therefore, future re- qoiests for high density housingg will have a difficult time complying with the policies unless the policy and decision makers are resolved to modify the standards and policies. Win considering multi-family development, one should also keep in mind the fact that the exisZfny policies permit such development in all intensity areas. If the concentration is limited and other criteria such as adequate site planning and accessibility to collector streets or larger is provided, multi-family pro- posals could conceivably meet development guide policies in low intensity areas adjacent to this moderate activity center. A total of 31.16 acres of multi-family development is proposal on the east side of Loop 288 and an additional 3.69 acres are re- served for multi-family use on the crest side between the pro- posed collector street and the northern boundary of the Pecan Creek floodway. The multifamily sections are designated so that the maximum concentration in any one contiguous area is 13.75 acres. This would allow approximately 302 units. The site plan includes generous open space areas and a collector street which should aid in diluting concentration of the units. The ope; Tpace will entail all of that land which lies in the floodway an,; flood plain. Development is prohibited within a floodway, and development in flood plain areas is contingent upon extensive engineering studies and requirements for elevat- ing any structures to an acceptable height above the 100 year flood. The Development Guide recommends that apartment develop- ments provide their own recreational areas, and, if attached as a condition, the open space areas could become functional as multi-,`amity development occurs in the future. Z-1540 Page 8 SUMMARY This overall proposal appears to qualify for the size bonus suggested for moderate activity centers that are diverse and planned with the community unit, concept in mind. Additional positive features include immediate access ti arterial streets, a proposed collector street which basically matches the thor- oughfare plan and sufficient green :pace and open areas. In- tensity is somewhat accepta'*.lee but it must be noted that unless policies and standards are modified, future proposals within this moderate activity area must be carefully evaluated to en- sure that a high intensity center is not created. If a portion of the general retail areas were designated for office or some other lower intensity use, the intensity factor would be even more favorable. It is also significant that future development of the diversified land uses occur in a consistent manner, and is especially not limited to the general retail areas. Proposed concentration of apartment units is within the standards for the i area, but the ability of each development to utilize open space areas to provide its own recreational facilities cannot be judged until specific site plans are received for review. The proposed plan does not create strip commercial development and j planned development zoning does provide the opportunity to en- sure strict plan control. i RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1540 I by a vote of 7 - 0 with the following conditions: j 1. Land uses within the planned development are restricted to the uses specifically designated on the general concept plan; specific site plan approval must be granted before ki development occurs within the designated land use areas. 12. Specific development proposals shall conform to City of Denton requirements regarding zoning use classifications, subdivision regulations, building codes and any other codes related to development. I Z-1540 Page 9 RECOMMENDATION (Continued) 3. Density in multi-family areas shall be limited to 22 units per acre. 4. Density in single family attached areas shall be limited to 10 units per acre. 5. Residential streets in accordance with City of Denton standards shall be provided for internal circulation. 6. A living screen or a six (6) foot masonry wall must be erected between the 10.18 acre retail area at the southwest corner of Loop 288 and East McKinney and the single family attached area beginning at its southern boundary when the general retail area is developed. 1. Adequate screening consisting of a living screen or a 6 foot solid masonry wall shall be erected along any property line where general retail abuts low density single family reti- dentialhousing when the general retail area is developed. 8.--Any land use permitted in the general retail (GR) classifi- cation of the zoning ordinance may be developed in the areas designated as general retail without amendment of the planned development (PD) ordinance. 9. If the development plans are not realized within five (5) years so that actual development includes 'some residential and is not limited to general retail, the planned develop- ment will be re-evaluated and considered a candidate for possible back-zoning to a smaller size center. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve Planned Development zoning with conditions. ~ 2. Approve Planned Development zoning without conditions. 3. Approve Planned Development with modified or additional conditions. 4. Deny petition. 5. Table for futre consideration. i i Z-1540 Page 10 ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. Site plan 3. Reply form total 4. Property owners list } 5. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of September 29, 1982 Page i 1 Z-1540 DEVLLOPMLNT !illDt C0141EIR MVtLO"jWT MTIBG COMP M TO POLICY POLICY NIA or $1:aht1 Unacceptable Unaeee"tl agla Unsure cea to la Aeceetebl Moderate Area Plan is utilizing 86% of unallocated intensity. Intensit A bonus size is giv X Standard en for diversity. Land Use Diversity Office or some other X Encouraged lower intensity use designations on por- tion of general re- tail areas would make proposal total- ly acce table. Existing low den- PD Zoning provided. X sity within one block protected by site plan control, etc. Proposed plan dis- courages strip X commercial. Access to Collec- Loop 288 and East X for Streets or McKinney are arter- greater. ials; proposed col- lector consistent with thoroughfare plan. Adequate open space All floodway and X recreacional areas flood plain (26 and diversity of acres) reserved as parks. open sppace. Un- known if open space will be utilized as recreational areas to serve multi-fam- ily sections. Concentration of 767 units are pro- X multi-family lim- posed. ited to 500-1000 units. {rDue t some uncer ainity in realizing diversity. PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL 2-1744 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDTCIDED None Received None Received gtr.a y r, A, u. lq&rr;s&h Alos ,IM-kild Sr. ;I( tu JA A44 re _ It i 1 3 1311 ty, r ,~A L ? r 7 .w P 6 Z Minutes May 22, 1985 Page 6 C. Z-1744. Petition of Clark Brothers requestin a change in zoning from the planned development (PD-41 district to the general retail (CR) classification on an 11.23 acre (UNAPPROVED) tract in the M. L. Austin Survey, Abstract 14, The prop- erty is located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 1,500 feet south of East McKinney Street (FM 426), The approved planned development permits multi-fam',ly and flood plain/open space land uses on this site. If the zoning change is approved, the property may be utilized for any land use permitted in the general retail (GR) district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. Four notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; no reply forms were received in favor, no reply forms were received in opposition, PETITIONER: Lewis Sweet, partner in Clark Brothers, stated they are requesting general retail zoning for this 11 acre tract which is a part of their planned 409 acre mixed use development. He said they are building a col- lector street through property, that Morse Street will be extended from Loop 288 to Woodrow Lane, He continued that floodway will be dedicated to city as a park, the area to south is planned as commercial and at Woodrow Lane there are existing light industrial uses. A natural line of trees will be kept as barrier between light industrial and low density housing. They feel that expansion of Loop 288, which is included in Highway Department five year plan, and the way area is developing changes the character of area. They feel that GR along the loop is proper and would act as a buffer to balance of site. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated this is part of PD-41 perm ng general retail, single family attached, single family detached, multi family and floodway and open space land uses. A size bonus was granted for diversified land uses and the overall proposal would eliminate a portion of approved single family and multi family and would defeat the purpose of the bonus for diverse land use. She said unrestricted GR zoning does not allow for protection of adjacent single family properties. She added that the Development Guide has a policy prohibiting commercial and retail stripping of major thoroughfares which this proposal will viola {e, Staff recommends denial. 7 7: P 8 Z Minutes May 22, 1985 Page 7 Mr. Sidor asked about a PD for GR and Ms. Spivey agreed that would be some control but said staff feels that general retail would not be an adequate buffer for single family. Mr. Sidor commented that adjacent property is owned byy petitioner and he would assume he would do what should be done for buffering but without a PD there would be no guarantee. REBUTTAL: None offered. Public hearing closed. Mr. Sidor commented that staff's concern is that removing this 11 acres from a PD and putting it into straight GR c:assification could create some problems as far as buf- fering. He said he saw no objection to general retail along Loop 268, that city is not going to have residential type construction on the loop. Mr. Pearson moved to recommend approval of Z-1744. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and carried (5-1). Mr. Escue voted no. h ~ DATZ% 06118/95 C9ITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-1745 RW MENDATION: The Planning an3 Zoning Commission recommendel approval of Z-1745 at its meeting of May 22, 1985. SUKKARY, A request by Nelles/Davis Interests for an amendment to a planned development (PD-90). The approved site plan would be altered, moving the ten (10) acre community service area to the west and eliminating approximately fourteen (14) single family toned lots. The street patterns within the development would also be altered. BACKGROUND- A planned development (PD-90) consistirg of %pproximately 129 acres was approved by the City Council in November, 1984. The following land uses are permitted: single easily (SF-10), two family, multi-family, office, general retail, and a park. PROGRAMS, DR ARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT, No fiscal impact is expected. Respectfully submitted, • G. Crs g City Manager Prepared by- Cecile Carson Urban Planner Appro WL~ Jeff Meye Director of Planning and Community Development 1022a r v'. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1745 Meeting Date: June 18, 1985 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Nelles/Davis interests 2701 W. Airport Freeway, suite 109 Irving, Texas 75062 Status of Applicant: Owners Requested Action: Amendment of planned development (PD-90). The approved site plan would be altered moving the ten (10) acre community service area to the west and eliminating approximately fourteen (14) single family zoned lots. The street patterns within the development would also be altered. Location and Size: The property is located east of Sherman Drive, northeast of Yorkshire Drive, and north of Kings fi:w. The tract is approximately 57 aci.is. Surrounding Land Use and zoning: North - Planned development (PD-90) including multifamily, four-plexes and retail; vacant South - Single family (SF-10) East - Agricultural (A); vacant west - Single family (SF-10) Intensity Analysis: Low intensity area. The area is 54% under the intensity standard based on existing land use and 50% under the intensity standard based on existing zoning. SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Sherman Drive is a primary major arterial and is maintained by the State Highway Department. Kings Row is designated as a collector street. (Case Z-1745) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Water and Sewer: Utilities. water, electricity, and sanitary sewer, all available. Detailed utility plans are being handled during the platting stage. Drainage: A drainage easement has !jeen provided along the west side of the development and a landscaped detention area will be maintained along the west side of the community service area. HISTORY A planned development ;PD-90) consisting of approximately 129 acres was approved by the City Council in November, 1984. The following land uses are permitted: single family (SF-10), two family, multi-family, office, general retail, and a park. The ordinance for the planned development requires "substantial compliance with the comprehensive site plan" and that "final street alignment shall be determined by the City Transportation Engineer.,, PROPOSAL The approved site plan included a row of approximately fourteen (14) single family residences buffering the existing houses on Yorkshire Drive and tte park area. The plan included three entrances to the development on the north and two entrances on the south off Kings Row. The amended site plan eliminates fotirteen (14) single family lots on the west and relocates the park or community service area to the west. The revised plan also realigns the streets and eliminates one entrance on the north and one entrance or the south. CONCLUSION The land use will not be significantly altered and the intensity for the area will not be affected. L RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1745, by a vote of 6-0. - (Case Z-1745) Page Three ALTERNATIVES 1. Approval of the petition with conditions 2. Deny the petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. Approved site plan 3. Proposed site plan 4. Memorandum from Jerry Clark 5. Property owner list 6. Reply form total 7. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of May 22, 1985. i i ill II 11988 MMOWWFA~ s.: c y 46 r 1 It I J' ;"1 t ~A . ;1 L kft Z-174 4 , ►n M Ir is i 1,•,s, y w o ..rte as ' ddl v w • 4a ~ All u•nOf ew " E,•O,ll M - ~ A•• DENTON • 00 al w w - IN - • AW~,f \ F Jf( Air s.r., CrACHCO A ty.C A4 G.R. r 'PO orrmC f,2 Ad. AGRItVLTUFtE r s1rr; A~OO rfON~ ft/ • roc SF- 7 G R sae Af.~ te. - 94 Ac. is U.AA V1ciN ITv MAP - 4004 o ~P / of . / b h. ~ F At.- R. ~aA.. IC u,AL G ~ A r ntx ?se M C. P' 1.0 At. t- v fC Y. At. % gu5~ 0 I -__.Lr. , A :to a.t R4rge otvae99wa G ` M%&A.. 4410 e ..rte ndKI TOM A ■ir, Own a Aao H£RCUlC3 ` wo ..urn of re %an fw Wiw ACRES • • y f WHO •wrf re r wuinwwl eP a eyt SF-7 PARR PAr* NOY[b r It,JAt, fo.fK. it q6 a . 1r 041.•4.90 O t /f Oft at' - 355-ft; f ~.c9 1f4~ Sr ' 1 1 --i o rew9♦.oa ,er also is) 1 4. p l O u 040 1 OV~.1.~ • O r • 1 F. i ~ ~ t rug .~1- I i.i _ r 01.:0 Ur it 1400__1 ~u 4. nrk _:4 `..ubDi.g GI1' 1+ } ` ref A,99~ I F• !0 6• \ ,yj --►+---r h14W WMAO, IV At Its w ~ 1 A w+ +rtfn pl 9+41 t4M ieN i•r. I h U Op / o n ~ M I GObmwE L ORivE tCAtC r' , 100 6f CCMAC4 S 1041! 11I - _ air 111.4♦ 1 - 1 1 r 7r „ 7',t, M 1 Id•hl~~•AH I~IAId CN j s r ;o M F t` •,o •tran rtAtr. F .10 - 10 z- X696 127.091 net Aues SAtiiuEL lOcC4aCKEN SURVEY A•al7 3 Ma:tA:/IV 1~kty 4. 17 1 so--0604 4FMO ep" • I ,r~:~~rfi~Mr~i A044 V jcto LO:r 4e4w 1 11 \ ~ I 'I MA d11M1•1111!Y ,ifl•Ilf .wK~ n A n ; i ; i ~ ~ ~ ~ l 1 1 i / aoIOr-s••MIr on►r o►t letirryit,l r / 111 N M 1 ~ ` Imo, iY . ' ~ j'~. ~ 1 111 / ~ f / Ir 1, ' ~ '1 ; 1i r, ~ I I 11 i Ir A ~ 1 f I f • ~ t 1 ~ r O , r + \ \ 1,1.1 t 1' Jw - f _ _ 40 , r l~~~•, rif i 11 u r •r • I. 1 1 ! h ! r f M 01 11 NwfMI N' Wl "64M~? A01fMf 4V40 A 04 to " 014 Y so, 1 :7tiweW "W"M I,. ►ti r ,111 J M~~'1• ~ (N , 1 r~11~ 'o lb too 00 on W SUZY MM AWTION I' r• - Y Y N d Y • M N N r r T-ir / •Nl w r rl • M/I w..t•, m1, `.,r r• / / y/1' W 1 11 •1 • M sll I rwll Ir1A t••11 #Awl _ _ JI/YYM' dew •IMIIV 1 •Yrr IIMrI r -14 Irblr! 1. / fee'. MVI L..f 'ti• "r .•y ~w~1w / IMf MYerF N N Mf 1-M M AYll~ 1r~1 MOM IV rTn' M! ~~UY CITY of DENTON; TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ! DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 15, 1985 TO., Denise Spivey, Urban Planner FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer SUBJECT: Z-1745 The proposed changes are acceptable with relation to design and orientation of street and drainage facilities. Howevar, placement of the detention pond inside the 10 acre community service area renders over 33% of the land unusable for any other use. This does not seem to be the best solution for Denton Independent School District, Parks Department and the citizens of Denton as the school w.,uld be crowded onto a small unexpandable area, No parks exist in this area now. I.KGrr`. Je r DaCi Eer is 110288E PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1745 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received Ann L. Steck 2200 Yorkshire Denton, TX 76201 566•-1514 I I t- 5 yQ y • a 2170 vi,7op ti '3 oa r. 75 a - -V *4 3 8 5a ~ 1150 1 L 750 -01 Oft r f m 1u Z-Iqu -colt* AM/ v 95 AA IJ t o0 7,1 - 1 / 4A IJAI i. P at aoo b pe / ~ W 61,317 Pau 279u - L o -~1Voo - ooh A760 P & Z Minutes May 22, 1985 Page 10 F. Z-1745. Petition o~ Nelles/Davis Interests requesting an amendment to planned development (PD-90). The property is located east of Sherman Drive and Yorkshire Drive and (UNAPPROVED) north of Kings Row. The amendment will not change the land uses in the planned development. However, the loca- tion of the ten (10) acre community service area would be moved to the west, eliminating approximately fourteen (14) single family zoned lots, and the street patterns within the development would be altered. Thirty-seven notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received in favor, one reply form was received in opposition, and one undecided reply form was received. PETITIONER: Dale Davis, partner of Nelle0l)avis Ti eres s, stated their approximately 128 acre tract was zoned planned development in November, 1984 for single family, two family, multi-family, office, genaral retail and park uses. They are requesting an amendment on lower S7 acres only to reposition uses and relocate streets. They found that the row of single family lots planned as a buffer to the existing Yorkshire single family houses is located in the natural flow of tract and cannot be developed as such. They propose to move park to the west; people they have talked with are pleased to have the park in natural part of tract. The school board is interested in purchasing the duplex lots for use as a school in conjunction with the park. He emphasized that no land uses are being changed, density is not being changed, and they do not want to affect the neighborhood in any adverse way. They have met with park department and have their approval. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT; Ms. Carson stated that the original devel- opment ordinance requires substantial compliance with the comprehensive site plan and that final street alignment shall be determined by the Transportation Engineer. She continued that new plan shows one access from Kings Row and one from Surrey Ridge. Proposal has been reviewed by the Development Review Committee and approval is recom- mended based on no significant effect. She continued that the intensity is not affected, detention will solve any drainage problems in area, it is acceptable with park department and is acceptable with school board to use corner site as a school. P $ Z Minutes May 22, 1485 Page 11 Mr. Clark said he wanted to be sure that park department is agreeable. in Ms. Carson replied and Recreation, had tcontacted rstaff nand Director ohe of Parks favor of proposal. REBUTTAL: Mr. Davis said his engineer is working with pater kdepartment so park can be developed in an efficient manner. Public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of Z-1745. aeon a by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0). 1114L ~ l NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PROVI)E FOR AN AMENDED SITE PLAN THEREFOR PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX H-ZONING OF THE CODE OF OkDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTOA, TEXAS AS SAID SITE PLAN APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 129 ACRES OF W.9 OUT OF THE MCCRACKEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 817 LOCATED ADJACENT A14J EAST OF SHERMAN DRIVE AND ADJACENT AND NORTH OF KINGS ROW STREET; DECLARING A PENALTY THEREFORE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the zoning classification and use designation of the property described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, having been previously designated as a Planned Development District under the provisions of Ordinance No. 85-150 passed and approved on the 15th day of January, L985, in accordance with the provisions of Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to provide for a revised comprehensive site plan for a portion of the development. SECTION II. The conditions and restrictions applicable to the property Oescribed herein and imposed therein by Section IV of Ordinance Nc.. °.5-15 are expressly retained and not amended by this ordinance. SECTION III. That a portion of the comprehensive site plan for the Planned Development District approved and adopted by Ordinance No. 85.15, applicable to the herein described property, is hereby amended in accordance with the comprehensive site plan attached hereto and the use of said property shall be hereafter in accordance with such amended site plan. SECTION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, Hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpoes of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. JECTION V. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the tequirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars (:200.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a sr arate offense for peach and every day or portion thereof durLpp which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued,, PAGE i e "r,..: r- : a and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION VI. That this ordnance shall becc4e effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby Denton the Recaption of this cord Chronic Is. the official newspaper published of twice directed in the cause the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985. RICHARD 0. STEVMM_,_F= CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: MY OF DENTONO TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE 2 • Watt 'P all thane 4001406 rrvaoo of Hrea11 of Lid oltragt is to* Comely N bee", pggt of To"16 bbag 40ecrlsN t1 a" ,t'riaalsR$I follows, to•wll+ 1.• t 131 that college Iran at Hrtal of lama all"14 to to Seoul McCr"I" Sower. 4.117, CJtff W Cerq at JStoo, Ttul Noy bof e (tailed) )31.641 tan true N1ar66od U s ~aN fr" Tmw Torpor, Trvatso to Ittrs" sonde alas waged 164 mein M1ni$ Dili" " hinan 1, toll. r warded u V: a" 173 "Is "1, MN Iecords st Mel" Cowatr, Toles N befog "!t fail? daggrs"d a 1011"st il~:WIN$ at old Vaal $"lMst sense of Isle 113,661 ecn state It the bune{t1" a the Vlsdls of • breath qle the b/tarl toil .f "7 a1 P.. r1NNwwr all{ TMYCe N. >j• IN Iset with the M41►"17 r!a4►att of n of P.M. Mlghwe7 all 1i"g W a"" a fare a 166i1vae of Is 4.94 feat ttoo"I Waal sls "the 5"0011rightat war to ioofile NNobel gIts No"1 0 1 ild'iiriH 81 .40 ,f'0iaf leg rusNN is ?alw Isis, HN 643, lead Men& • Ina" Cocoa Ii 1 ~MIMq I"thanurl visit lea 111th 1»V►MrUl" I 0([tlf on►ef4 Well 11 t~a f411"16e 7 Karl s d11fa"tat 131.Jf /941/1111 J.~i 16. As, 1! '1 (114.64 n" t4 '1t I1• . '13 1' 1`•3111'•1/ f»ii "i`lifl It` toot to a gg" PIN " till Mat Mrpry 11" of $414 111.163 sort still see s1 sold Mel:ntttt 1Mibt1 S. S 1o' 41' Vote a ditta"a er 1113.64 Coal is a total #is a• too I"UMat urea tf INd times cal N rid ltaCagolN Nnerr egg! 1 N BISON MwI of %141 "iarCMIss sor'rr.jtMT310 gills with i /66w'es`$1 144 !ales feet to tN tl"at ':4 larval N W 133.643 riot %oon 11''TUNING1l1. i•aIt, 1''Iess 1".11 lost to the Np"Isg of a serves a s1tra lics Ve4 booslu7ll0arecial a IB lei.to at left ba/tag tal Roll of so, . a Cuts of $1 0 31.41 ne, a 1{a, a!! $1.1 1"t led u an 1n34of 11.11 feat to us a"- S u!/ ewrwtl TaNCI M. 11 41' 34' MN 111.13 feat to a 44nn IS no alddle of soli bri"►I TBJW Mrlm"Atnl!! a bad a curve 1 1. It Nrleg 1 ggolrll basis of $p 31' a Nord me M. '61111! 71- best 31.17 toot, a "4114 of 113.11 foes, led u are lusth of 91.11r"fast to IMC3 1.'314 11is $a- kit suryll 11 14 eggs u a reraer is lotd brut!; TLItCI 1. 194 11' 64" ha 114.14 Ilia IS I tsalr is fail brass! tali Mosel 1 1. Is* Its N• well 661,11 fat to a caner is bru4► TIgeCJ I. 11• e1' !e' Nn 111 toot to the Piece at latltabal s4 tatlelsly !e all 1ti.76 I "014 of )lei. 1► /1r143i.•A• ••'WIIMItIN 111 tut unau treat n joano3 H IsN titrt" la the iwwl MIrea1N derny 1.111. IN1N CMIaI4 14864. halal !!Iher d a (911101) 141.343 site treat bear! Is a deed @Ad oflMi is illt"a As'lobmrynis ills neiepi`$a ,,sloe 119, Palo Hf, Deal INerds of lass Swop am ►aa/I Nn tt ilallM6start►q M t111M1 frets 6r Lits imnatttiaiff gaas uu'tiila++t/n1ldalsold i if .ir111are P.M. Assafty 1 tif, sta W W bell al"Is wio No" th us 1:114iti +ilrl _ of help 4t P.A. alla+l all i disunu of 611.13 left t6 a steel join at of 0t"a a~ Messaleli • • TUL40 WHO It, Il• it 6 illsNM of M1.11 teat to 4 414141 Ir o Ile but McNary It" of U113.111 ears tract aa~ the h!t loo&V Ill of tM kcni3N loner= so W tt11Mq I. 3 1111 41• bls c3u w has Its" Use to 4 steel via w at 4NM4tithM"'ejoMoif rj 1!M of of treailfoieat ugeaN Loop 111 as b►oriMd to a deed trN INrsta lands frt NA W, at M lM IMs of foul and relodai t■ Vole" Ills. M 49341 MI D4e4t1a of hot" coal 114o" let sit f with us loll Molly 1114 as Irelated tNO 11t 2104 ~6 atol 3 N4 lala sad u iat,•ar If.l tools fisf ' •4i • 4 I 6y: 4fflu1'illuf'tl 61 310 V. 1 1.60 l I' li• eaet aN (if D. Ili 11' il• s 19.11 fell ass 1tstool " groat W N Ji`Ustirit/Ntlits of . date[ t.M. X16" ail= ' had seaati lull a ddistance of s331 f1 fiuriililittJm 60, 3 laau/us W uauuint to oil Waft a TO sf ass. 4 3t'. r.I f 4W MV RAW III` -~M l }~•,J~`•~ _-.t- --ww ~ ~I ~ ~ rnAII rJ•W.1•~i~,~~~/ I \ ` I •114 OYrYnnM, Y •fibRY A~f~fA ~ 1•A w ; i r ~ I'..\ / ` f agar•.vt+>t.a awrAa.rw,ru!c.%~' .e~ arr. n r ''1 I-INALJ / r M lie. I w ! 'r• _ ~ ' r - 7 Ow ~r• `•h • it 11 f Yr 1 `i- 'i e a w . _I~r ; , It so 0 It t, r. ! u• J \ ~ .1 r 1 f ~ i ~ ` _ _ 1 Irr .U ' 1 I• ~ ~ v=-I -~4-I - - i ' r'd Nr~.::: :.i i.:::'I~. r"i i' r 1 ~00 h, soft. MI W wa i r t _ I ~ ~ rnrl.w RIf ! , ,iii • - r✓''_ sum rim $ ow` ylT r a a a to r r r_ r it Y MM a ":I:r .~'i.dm 0 0 he wN, W,, i .~.w.. w ' ri1i111 p/trr AMif j I rsN. r~• I , / ~ r rr• I wwll • IIIw ►.rI a1w1 wwlT.~ ISLE t w I IM .IIrwrRr ~N MMA. 1. ~ W y M ~ IA, .,'b a ' wN~a ~ DATE: 6/18/85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT, , 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CASE Z-1;50 RECOMME KI ION : The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its meeting of June 12, 1985 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1750 by a vote of 7-0. SUMMARY: This is a 95.2 acre tract located on the west side of I-35W approximately 3,500 feet south of Airport Road (F.M. 1515.) BACKGROUND: The property is located in a high intensity area and is listed as a proposed industrial site in the Economic Development Fact Book. Light industrial zoning is consistent with the above referenced policies. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no irpact on the general fund. Respe4ul submitt G. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: b_ 5< ve Denise Urban Manner AppriAK Jeff Meyer, ti . A-- Director of Planning and Community Development 1031a e PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1750 Meeting Date: June 18, 1985 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: L. A. Nelson 700 let State Bank Building Denton, Texas 76201 Status of Applicant: Owners attorney/representative Requested Action: Change in zoning from the agricultural ;A) to the light industrial (LI) classification. Location and Size: Approximately 95.2 acres located on the west side of Interstate Highway 35-W approximately 3,500 feet south of Airport Road (F.M. 1515). Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Use and zoning: North - Concrete batch plant, Manufacturing, LI, A South - Vacant: Outside city limits East - Residential development, I-35W; A, SF-16 West - Vacant: outside city limits, Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as high intensity. SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: This tract has frontage on the 1-35 W service road. Loading of the service road back to F.M. 1515 may add to the existing traffic problems in this area. The property frontage on Corbin Road is at a low water crossing point and a bridge may be needed when Corbin Road is improved. Sidewalks will be required on Corbin Road and the I-35 W service road. (Case Z-1750) Paga Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) Drainoge: This tract is located at the confluence of Dry Fork Hickory Creek and Dry Fork Hickory Creek, Tributory A. Flood plain and drainage will be major considerations for this site. Public Utilities: Gas, electric, and telephone service is available for this property. A water line extends to the northern boundary of this property. This line must be extended southward along the property frontage. The tract is serviced by an 18" sewer line and a 15" sewer line along the western boundary of the property. I ANALYSIS This site is located in a high intensity area. The Denton Development Guide specifies that little control of intensity is proposed in these areas. This particular high intensity node is designated as the main industrial area for the City. Further- more, the Denton Economic Development Fact Book touts this property as a prime industrial site for the City. Light indus- trial (L:) zoning is compatible with the above referenced policies and goals. RF.COWIFNDATION The Plaroting and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1750 by a vote of 7-0. ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve petition 3. Deny petition ATTACIDIENTS 1, Location Map 2. Economic Development Fact Book Site HAp I (Case Z-1760) Page Three ATTACHMENTS (continued) r 3. Reply Form Totals 4. Property OwneL Gist 5. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June 12, 1985 1017a i A ! ~ ~ ~ ~r rrrrf r j t I , i• ~ i ~ LI / ' r S•69 8170 i_ _ • Li _ 2F I j a Z-1750 f SF-16 ~ f ~_COR81N RD, ' I t4 'w l~ w Apr loft clu ~~'tn \ I /1 Ili " i 411 two e site E 1 i . /71 l ■ o ' y ~ " / ~ Yr - I~ W ~r .fir y 0. '1Y III wZ! \ 1 r / ~ t w 3w Garr SITE E ' LAND INFORMATION OWNERSHIP: Robert Jones TOTAL LAND AREA: 95 acres ZONING CLASSIFICATION: Agricultural HIGHWAY ACC:SS: Excellent. The site Is located off Interstate Highway 35W. This provides direct access to Dallas and Ft. Worth as well as northward through the central United States. SOIL DESCRIPTION: This arsa is composed of Ponder loam and Frio soils with 4 to 3 percent slopes. No flood ha=ard exists along,the highway frontage portion of this site. UTILITIES: Site is totally serviced gas, sewer, and electri;l• ty. Water is available In the Imr..edfate vicinity. t V1Y M".. y 1-. a l 4s PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1750 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Joe Belew None Received P. 0. Box 1188 Denton, TX 76202 387-0572 COA a h~_ nQ2YxtI_ } 4 l I t. fir.. ~a ~T /03'1 Yj, 11 ~ E E-R ~ e I 4 . r. qE - F P fr Z tjinutes June 12, 1985 Page t D. Z-1750. Petition of L. N. Nelson, representing James F. (UNAPPROVED) aM son and Robert W. Jones, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the light industrial (LI) classification on 95.265 acres. The property is located west of I-35W, approximately 3,500 Feet south of Airport Road (FM 1515) and shown in the 0. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56, and the T. W. Daugherty Survey, Abstract No, 356. If the zoning change is approved, the property may be utilized for any land use permitted in the light industrial (LI) classification by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. Six tiotices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; no reply forms were received in favor or in opposition. PETITIONER: Mr, Nelson representing the owners of the property, stated that light industrial uses exist In the general area, that property adjacent and south is occupied by Moore Business Forms Systems. lie continued they believe the application to be consistent with the existing zoning in that particular area. He said in area annexation pro- ceedings, it was their thinking that more property should be annexed and at that time their 90 acre tract was brought into the city. He said the northern portion of the tract is under contract for immediate purchase by a Fortune 500 company contingent upon zoning, He added that whatever utilities are needed will be provided, IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that property is located in aahigh intensity area, that site is included in the Economic Development Fact Book as a recommended site for industrial uses. Site clarified availability of utilities by saying that a waterline extends to the northern boundary of this property whizh would have to be continued southward along the .property frontage ani tract is served by sewer facilities. Request is compatible with Development Guide policies and staff recommends approval. REBUTTAL: None offered. Public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr, Sidor moved to recommend approval of T-1750. Secon,:ed by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (7-0). CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT DATE: 06/18J85 TO Mayor and Members of the City Council D FROMe G, Chris Hartung, City Manager ~~~ttt SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING THE PETITION OF THE CITY OF DENTON AND PAT O'BRIEN FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 160 ACRES OF LAND BEING PART OF THE G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1330, AND THE M.E.P. AND P.R.R. SURVEY, ABSTRACT 950, AND SITUATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF PAIGE ROAD BETWEEN I-35E AND SWISHER ROAD (A-20) RECOMMENDATION: The Plar:iing and Zoning Commission will make its recommendation on June 12, 1985. SUMMARY: A 41.6 acre parcel proposed for mobile home park development ad,iacent to the Rollingwood Estates planned development precipitated this joint annexation petition. The City Council directed staff to add surrounding property that may have development potential. Property along the north side of Paige is included and the reaction of property owners to involuntary annexation is unknown at this time. BACKGROUND: Existing and proposed development ranging from attractive single family to well to poorly maintained manufactured housing has impacted the Paige Road corridor, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Twelve (12) property owners were notified of the annexation requast. The O'Brien interest has replied in favor and Mr, Arnold Kenas has submitted a roply form in opposition. Sherwood Mobile Home Park is also included in the proposed area of annexation. The park is well maintained, but is not aerved by fire hydrants, FISCAL IMPACT: Department budgets Respectfully submitted: • 2z Pe= G. C a g Prepared by: City Manager &J. al'L~rll~lj ravid Ellison Senior Planner Appro d: Jeff Meyer Director of Planning and Community Development 11958 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Hold a public meeting concerning the petition of the Ci',,y of Denton and Pat O'Brien for annexation of approximately 160 acres of land being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1:1300 and the M.E.P. and P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 950, and situated north and south of Paige Road between I-35E and Swisher Road (A-20) SUMMARY: The 41.6 acre parcel proposed for mobile home park use is located adjacent and south of Paige Road beginning approximately 11172 feet west of the intersection of Paige and Swisher Roads. The Rollingwood Estates tract (annexed and approved for estate and manufactured housing) abuts the sLbject parcel to the east. A peti- tion for voluntary annexation and a specific use permit has been submitted by Mr. Pat. O'Brien, prospective developer of the mobile home park. Existing land uxe on the 41.6 acres precipitating this petition is undeveloped property being used for agricultural purposes. Surrounding and additional land use added to the petition consists of vacant land, single family residen- tial., and Sherwood Mobile Home Park. STREETS AND DRAINAGE: If approved for development, all housing must be set one foot (11) above the 100 year flood level its the streets and channels. Paige Road is an unimproved collector street requiring sixty feet of total right-of-way width. Perimeter street paving across the frontage of Paige Road will be a minimum requirement when or if development occurs. i UTILITIES: Electric service is available from the City of j Denton and TPAL. Analysis of the existing lift station/forcemain system indicates that neither has sufficient capacity to handle proposed new development in this area. Current Subdivision Regulations and Land Development Codes provide that it is the developer's responsibility to install or upgrade facilities sufficient enough to serve their site. If the site is not annexed and extension of, and connection to, the City public utility system is desired, public utility board, planning and zoning commission and city council approval is required upon written request. Gas and telephone service is in place or available for extension. Agenda Back-up summary June 18, 1985 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: If property proposed for development is annexed all City of Denton building codes, fire codes, zoning ,-rdinance and mobile home park and travel trailer ordinance provisions apply. If the property is not annexed, but is connected to the City's public utility system, the Building Inspection Division will inspect private lines for compliance with City of Denton Plumbing Codes. PLANNING AND LAND USE POLICIES: This site is on the fringe of the Denton Development Guide study area. If extended this site would logically fall within a low intensity area. Location policies for mobile home parks (approved September, 10.84) in low intensity areas are: 1. The overall intensity standard not be violated 2. No concentration more than 200 units 3. Access by collector street or larger (if density less than 12 units per acre) 4. Strict site plan control within 1,600 feet of existing single family residential 5. Sufficient green space, recreation facilities, etc. provided 6. Input into planning by neighborhood ACTION REQUIRED: No action is required to continue annexation process. ?ROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The existing population in this area particularly residents of Chaparral Estates in Shady Shores were almost categorically opposed to the Rollingwood Estates development propcsal. Twelve (12) owners of property are included in the annexation boundaries, Approximately five (5) private residences and property belonging to cwo corporations or companies (Enderby Gas Co. and Andrew Corporation) will be affected if the annexation continues as proposed. One reply form was recoived in opposition to this annexa- tion petition. No property owners spoke in opposition to the petition at the first public hearing of the City Council held on June 4, 1985. Agenda Back-up Summary June 1s, 1985 Paye 3 The Sherwood Mobile Home Park is included in the area. The park currently accomodates approxi- mately 94 cote and an additional fifteen lots being added. There are no fire hydrants in the mobile home park and the Fire Department is typically concerned about annexation of existing uses with)ut optimum fire protection services. The Sherwood Mobile Home Park is connected to City of Denton public sewer but water is provided through a private well system. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Annex. 41.6 acre parcel proposed for mobile home park use only 2. Annex parcel and surrounding property as proposed 3. Annex 41.6 acres and surrounding property, excluding existing rousing and development 4. No annexation ATTACHMENTS: 1. Map 2. Development Review Committee minutes of March 5, 1985 3. List of existing and proposed parks and subdivisions 1, t fi U.i Q~•.~ ZY~: Dav Ellison Senior Planner 0751s • tt~ LIN. I r~ :17r 't ` > .es~e+} POCK, JS R ilk I \ a. f CCRIMM ZMJ I' I, 1 1 . Minutes Development Review Committee March 5, 1985 DRC Members Presents David Ham, .Jayne Horsley, Don McLaughlin, A oorosh Olyai, Robert Hagemann, David Salmon, °ab`iie Baughman, Bran Kurtz, and Cecile Carson Engineer, Planner, Architect, Surveyor, or ,other development interests preze nts Steve Rogers, Randy Hill and Pat O'Brien IX. Review of Proposed Mobile Home Patks Addition on 41.6 Acres on Paige Road A. Engineering 1. Neel to submit off-site drainage with preliminary plat. 2. Acted intensity for 10 year storm and time of concentration of 10 mi►iotes in 8 in./hrs. 3. Off-site permission will be needed to run storm water to adjoining property. 4. Mobile homes must be set one (1) foot above JOG year flood level in the streets and channels. 5. Show what happens to runoff from area 5. 6. Off-site paving of Paige Road needed at this time to i-35. 7. Perimeter pave Paige Road across frontage. 8. Sidewalks required along Paige Road. B. Transportation Engineering 1. Paige Road is a collector size street requiring 60 feet of right-of-way and subject to perimeter str,)et improvements. 2, Width of roadways within the park is given in Denton Mobile Home Ordinance - the proposed 30 feet is not adequate, 3. All internal streets should have right angle intersections. Minutes Development Review Committee Mobile Home Park Addition March 5, 1985 Page 2 8. rr&nsportation Engineering (Continued) 4. Intersection bounded by Lots 128 and 156 should be re-designed. 2. Engineering plans should not have any vertical curves less than 100 feet and no horizontal. 3. Will support off-site improvements of Paige [toad to I-35. C. Water and Sewer 1. Art. 4.07 Water Utilities Standards. Basic Policy: Water systems shall be provided with a sufficient number of outlets and shall be of sufficient size to furnish adequate domestic water supply to furnish fire protection to all lots and to conform to the City of Denton Master Water Plan, the Comprehensive Utility Ordinance of the City of Denton and the Standard Specifications of the City of Denton. 2. Art. 4.08 Sewer Utility Standards. Basic Policy: Sanitary sewer facilities shall be provided to service the subdivision adequately and conform to the City of Denton Master Sewer Plan, Standard Specifications and the Comprehensive Utility Ordinance of the City of Denton. 3. If outside city limits, a letter requesting service must be approved by Public Utilities Board, Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 4. Suggest developer confer with Burke Enginneering for use of Rollingwood Estates Lift Station and proposed force main (pro rata or joint venture). 5. Proposed 12" water line on Paige Road should be adequate. 6. No oversize agreement required. 7. May have pro _rata charges for sanitary sewer and water line after construct.ion. 8. If utilities are public show water and sewer lines underneath pavement, 5 feet from curbs on each side. If utilities are to be located along a county or state road, a 16 foot easement outside the right-of-way is required. I Minutes Development Review Committoe Mobile Home Park Addition March 5, 1985 Pag !~o 3 C. Water and Sew+ar (Continued) 9. Use of City easement next to the railroad will not be allowed. 10. Show all water and sewer lines, easements, fire hydrants, manholes, etc. on preliminary plat. 11. Are utilities public or private? Need to show internal water and sewer lines. 12. Fire flow required is 500 g.p.m. Will need at least 6" water line. D. Electric Electric service is available from the City of Denton at cus'..omer's request. 9. Fire i 1. Fire hydrants required every 300 feet. I 2. Must provide an all weather driving surface on not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width, with ade- quate roadway turning radius capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus before construction begins. 3. Fire hydrants and water system must be operational before construction begins. 4. The access roadway shall be extended to within 150 fe6t of all portions of the exterior walls 3f the first story of any building. 5. Uniform Fire Code, 3982, is applicable. 6. Pre-design plan is acceptable. F. Building Inspection t 1. This development will need to comply with orlinance t84-65. 2. Review will continue. Minutes Development Review Committee Mobile Hove Park Addition March 5, 1995 Page 4 G, Lone Star Gas Service can be provided. H. G.T.B. 1. Service iP available. 2. An B foot communication easement at the rear of the property is needed. 1. Cox Cable No representative present. J. Solid Waste 1. Residential solid waste service is available. 2. Thee City Ordinance requires that all such units be se,ved by the City'a Sanitation Division. 3. We will provide twice--a-week curb service, and collection of bulk trash once a week. 4. All garbage must be placed in plastic bags or small boxes. Custoarrs will be billed on their utility bills. K, Parks and Recreation Pre-design plan is acceptable. L. Planning and Community Davelopm6!it 1. this property could be considered for annexation. 2. If annexation process is started, a Specific Use Permit for a mobile home park will be required. 3. The park would have to comply to the Mobile Hocae Park Ordinance, if annexed. Manufactured Homes, Mobile Home parks and Subdivisions (Existing and Proposed) Existing ?arks Acorn 20 Units Bourland - *Capricorn 72 Centerpoint 130 Country View - *Denton West (380) - Denton Wist 300 *Hickory Creek - Hillcrest 60 Inman 15 Lakewood Estates 200 Mayhill 50 Mayhill 5 *Royal Oaks 150 Sherwood (382-990:3) 97 *Silverdome 90 Sunrise 35 Trianglo - *Twin Lakes 320 *Vacation Village - Wynn's 377 Trailer village 50 Y Motel 20 Approved But Not Developed: Champion 651 Allen 225 Subdivisons: Sandy Hill 80 lots *Serren Meadows 32 *Grissom Road - Rollingwood Estates (manufactured housing) * Outside City Limits 0732,E *fs' A•20 ANNEXATION SCHEDULE May 13, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item ✓ May 14, 1985 Submit Cite Council agenda back-up Nay 21, 1985* City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing May 22, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle May 24, 1985 Publish notice and mailout May 27, 1985 submit City Council agenda item May 28, 1985 submit City Council agenda back-up June 40 1985* City Council holds public hearing June 5, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle June 7, 1985 Publish notice and mailout ,i June 10. 1985 submit city council agenda item June 11, 1985 submit City Council agenda back-up June 18, 1985* City Council holds second public hearing June 24, 1985 Submit city council agenda item June 25, 1985 Submit City Counc'.l agenda back-up July 2, 1985* City Council institutes annexation proceedings J'►ly 5, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle July 7, 1985 Publish ordinance August S* 1985 Submit City Council agenda item August 6, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up August 13, 1985* ?inal action by City Council *Denotes action by ..ne city council 09648 DAT[S; 06/18/85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO; Mayor and Member-i of the City Council FROM,. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING PETITION OF BRUCE R. WEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF 258.66 ACRES BEING PART OF THE S. MYERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 843, AND THE A. MILLER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 887, AND BEGINNING WEST OF UNDERWOOD ROAD, EAST OF C. WOLFS ROAD, SOUTH OF JIM CHRISTAL ROAD AND NORTH OF TOM COLE ROAD (A-21} RECOMMENDATION: NA SUMMARY: This is a voluntary petition which also Includes a request for light industrial toning. 1ACSI q RO NQ: NA PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; Petitioners and City of Denton FISCAL IMPACT; Undetermined Raspec~ll;f~mi e 0. Chris Hartung city manager Pre red ; _ r~)Wll David Ellison Senior Planner Apprjd4 Jeff Meyee Dir6ctor of Planning and Community Development Od16s CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SU!RMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing concerning the petition of Bruce R. West for voluntary annexation of 258.66 acres being part of the S. Myers Survey, Abstract 843, and the A. Miller Survey, Abstract 887, and beginning west of Underwood Road, east of C. Wolfe Road, south of Jim Christal Road and north of Tom Cole Road (A-21). SUMMARY: This is a voluntary petition for annexation and a change in zoning petition for approximately 658 acres adjacent and north of the City of Denton Municipal Airport at its closest point has also been submitted. The requested zoning is light industrial (LI). The petition for annexation and zoning was possibly precipitated by the inclusion of this site in an area considered appropriate for light industrial use by the Economic Development Fact Book (see exhibit N1). Approximately three (3) structures and residences are located within the affected area. A major annexation in 1983-84 included the bulk of the 658 acres i!:Iuded in the change in zoning petition. It is extremely difficult to anticipate the im- mediate development potential to this tract. The nearest public water and sewer facilities are approximately 2,000 feet away according to the Economic Development Fact Book. The City of Denton has customarily accepted petitions for voluntary annexation when the property in question is primarily undeveloped and the immediate demands on City services is limited. Annexation of this tract would be consistent with actions taken on previous annexations in this area and a recommendation from the Airport Board, as well as the Planning and Zoning Commission, will be forwarded to the City Council. ACTION REQUIRED: Hold a public hearing. EXHIBITS: 1. Map 2. Excerpt from Economic Development Fact Book _1a11N &Jain David Ellison Senior Planner 08168 r , I It INI 9 JIM CHRISTAL RD. _ i tC L TOM COLE RD. i I I MIL 40. 64 age. r.w~r t:1 t. .;u t IM.0 RI* A 1 r^ ` ~l o i1 i'' `it Site H h • . ~a Crr~k~~' wl/ ^ I i 1' r c'~ y _ sr-^• I CENTOrrI Ai; 0 JOY SITE H LAND INFORMATION OWNERSHIP: Foster Lindsey, Inc. TOTAL LAND AREA: 693 acres 70NING CLASSIFICATION: Agricultural HIGHWAY ACCESS: Jim Christal Road provides direct access to Inlirstate Highway 35, which Is two miles to the east, AIR AND RAIL ACCESS: The site Is adjacent to the canton Airport. Rail lines are not directly adjacent, but a spur could be constructed In the future. BOIL DESCRIPTION: The site Is mostly Ponder loam and Burleson clay loam with I to 3 percent slopes. The Dry Fork of Hickory Creek runs through tho property. UTILITIES: Electricity Is available at the $Its. Sewer and water lines are located 2000 It. away. Natural gas Is available In the vicinity. 4..f A-21 ANNEXATION SCHEDULE Kay 280 1985 Submit City Council agenda item may 29, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up ✓ *J?Ine 4, 1985 City Council set,x dates time and place for public hearing June 5, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle v June 7, 1985 Publish notice and mailout ✓ June 10, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item June 100 1985 Airport Board makes recommendation June 110 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up June 12, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission makes recommendation *June 18, 1985 City Council holds public hearing June 198 1985 - Notice to Denton Record Chronicle June 21, 1985 Publish notice and mailout June 24, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item June 25, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up *July 21 1985 City Council holds second public hearing July 8, 1985 Submit city council agenda item July 9, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up *July 161 1985 City Council institutes annexation proceediAge July 18, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle July 21, 1985 Publish ordinance August 26, 1985 Submit City Council Agenda item August 27, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up *September 3. 1985 Final action by City Council *Denotes action by the City Council 09649 J NO. AH ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND :)ROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment 'supplies or services in accordance with the procedurut. of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and reccm ended that t`e herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; and 4 WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires t,.at the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the numbered items in the following numbered bide for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" attached heratoI are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bide for such items: BID !UMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT _ 9448 Street _Pertieipation $_28.117.74 94`~ Waterline _Participation $,12.338.40 9453 (/1,2,63 Neiman Environments 6,400.00 9453 _ 11/1 ` Neiman Environments $ 17,928.00 9453 III_ 1162 Edwards McDonald Co. 7,160.00 9453 IV/1,5,68 Game Time $_16,615.00 9453 IV/3 Wickham Supply $ 3,171,94 9453 IV/4 8 7 Neiman Environments _ $ 12_ ,947.44 PAGE i SECTION 11, That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bide for such items and agrees to purcb.ase the aaterialsI equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Hid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION 111. That should the City and persons submitting approved and accepted irAms and of the submitted bids wish to enter intj a formal written agreoment as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bid3, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorised to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized heroin. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall becomo effective immediately its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this IS day of June , 1985. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CRUM-ME ALL0 CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON,1TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYt PAGE I 15 DATE: June 189 1985 CITY COUNCIL REPORT T0: , Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: BID !9448 WESTGATE HEIGHTS PHASE I - STREET PARTICIPATION RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid participation be approved for the low bid as shown on the attached tabulation sheet. The estimated total cost on the square yards of construction shown will be $28,117.74. SUMMARY: This is for the participation of extra width and depth of collector streets in the Westgate Heights Phase I Addition. The bid was taken and received on April 23, 1985. We have already approved the water participation on May 15, 1985. This is for the street participation which was received on the same bid. BACKGROUKD: Tabulation Sheet with Calculations PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Street Funds FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund. Respectful! submit d: Oft 4 ~ Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: Q seM me: J h "J. Marshall, C.P.M. t ile: Purchasing Agent Approved: o n Marshall, C.P.M. itle: Purchasing Agent BID # 9448 BID WEST+AT H I.HTC DHASF I _ ATKINS CALVERT JAGOE ADOBE AWARDED PARTICIPATION BROS. PAVING PUBLIC CONST. COST OPEN April 23, 1985 9 CONST. CO. ACCOUNT # QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR Participation Rid Amountt Hydraded Lime S.Y. .77 .72 .70 .72 1h HMAC Type D S.Y. 3.12 3.00 2.85 2.55 h HMAC Type G S.Y. 7.29 8.00 6.55 6.55 Total Cost Extra Width S.Y. 13.23 14.22 11.45 11.47 11.47 1316 S.Y. x cost 17,410.68 180713.52 150068.20 1rj,094.52 15 094.52 1" HMAC Type G S.Y. 2.08 2.00 1.90 1.87 1.87 Extra Depth 6964.29 S.Y. x cost 149485.72 13,928.58 13,232.15 13 023.22 13,094.22 TOTAL PARTICIPATION 31,896.40 320642.10 28j300.35 280117.74 281117.74 • CITY COUNCIL. REPORT DATE: June 18, 1985 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: BID 09448 PARTICIPATION OVERSIZE RECOMMENDATION: we recommend this participation be approved on this the latest bid on the oversize water line from 8" to 12" including valves and fittings to Checkmate Development Co. The attached tabulation sheet shows the low bid difference and the calculated total on the quantities shown. The estimated total City of Denton participation is $12,338.40. SUMMARY: This project is for the oversize water line on Northwood Additions 9 and 10. We have calculated the cost difference for the City of Denton on our latest bid cost for the difference between the required 8 inch line and the needed 12 inch line. The estimated length has been checked by our Engineering Department and the actual cost will be calculated when the line is completed and accepted. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet with cost Differences PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Water 3 Sewer Department FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund. Water b Sewer Account ,#623-008-0461-7916 Respectfully submitted: ja A 04 gtg-o- Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: C .cam o n Marshall, C.P.M. P e: Purchasing Agent Approved: / C 09 V-4 lJa, Jq1 n J. Marshall o C.P.M. : P urchasing Agent r BID # 9448 BID PARTICIPATION - NORTHWOOD ATKINS D/FW JAY MAR CALVERT DICKERSON LOW AWARDE TOTAL AMOUNT ADDITION 9/10 BROS. UTILITY CORP. PAVING AMOUNT TO CHECKMATE OPEN D/FW CORP. ACCOUNT # QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR BID DIFFERENCES 1 2261' 12"/8" Water Main 4.75 4.40 6.00 7.00 6.00 4.40 91948.40 2 5 ea. 12"18" Gate Valves 415.10 305.00 450.00 300.00 325.00 305.00 1,525.00 3' 1 Lot 1 Ton/~ Ton Fittings 865.00 865.00 865.00 TOTA! PARTICIPATION 129338.40 4 DATE June 18, 1985 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: BID /9453 IMPROVEMENTS FRED MOORE PARK ashfollowsidders as RECOMMENDATION: perrthe thitachedstabulbid Section I: Items 1. 21 b 3to Neiman Environments for trees @ $6,400.00. Section II: Item 1 to Neiman Environments for sidewalk @ $17,928.00. Section III: Item 1 6 2 to Ed4ards McDonald Co. for overlay on basketball court @ $7,160.00. Section IV: Item 1 to Game Time for picnic shelter @ $5,600.00• Item 3 to Wickham Supply for irrigation protect @ $3, 171.94. Item 4 to Nieman Environments for Irrigation installation @ $7,147.00. Item 5 to Game Time for playground equipment 9 ;10,347.00. Item 7 to Neiman Environments for hydromulch @ 55,800.00. Item 8 to Game Time for a handicap drinking Fountain @ $868.00. Total award for this bid $64,421.94. SOWRY: This bid was sent to several prospective bidders including minorities. We received basically only one bid for the items recommended above. This bid has been evaluated and recommended by both Parks and Recreation and Community Grant coordinators. BACKGROUND: Tabulati,m Sheet PROGRAMS. DEPARTEMITS_OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Community Dtdelopment Block Grant Parks b Recreation FISCAL IMPACT: Grant Funds. There is no impact on the General Fund. Respectfully Submitted: 4 A44 r s artung City Manager Prepared by: Mars a , Ono 44 O:itle Purchasing Agent Approved: sr. a o tin .Mars a , T le: Purchasin ~ ent BID 9453 BID FRED I400RE PARK IMAROVEMENTS EDWARDS GAME SOUTER NEIMAN IWICKHAM MCDONALD TIME PAVING SUPPLY OPEN May 7, 1985 2 p.m. CO. INC. ACCOUNT I QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR Section I 1 4 Red Oak 2 3 Bradford Pear 640. n 3 3 Bold Cypress Section li 1 18001f 4" Sidewalk 2 4 Access Ramps Section III 1 1 As halt Overlay 2 1 Asphalt New 7,160.00 Section 11L 1 Picnic Shelter 2 Installation 3 Irrigation P t 3,171,94 4 Installation 5 Game Time 13181 10,347,00 6 Foundation Removal 7 H dromulch 9 Drinkin Fountain 868,00 e1. '8• A' '1 11v NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS: PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improve- ments in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and wHEAEAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bide for the construction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita- tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bides BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 9467 MESCO $ 172,847.00 3 $ + $ S,ITION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above competititve bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. PAGE 1 SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authoriied to excecute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantitites and specified sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorised herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18 day of June 1985. RICHARD 0. 5TEWARTO MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN cITT-91MM"MY CITY OF DENTON,$TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHg CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE 2 BATE: June 189 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung. City Manager SUBJECT: 810 19467 138 KY LINE TAP (PAGE RD. SUBSTATION) RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting specification, WESCO at $172,847.00 which is a very good bid. SUMMARY: We sent this bid out to several vendors and received three no bids and tow bids. This is unusual. However, we find that WESCO did not take exceptions and were the low bidders. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS. DEPARTMEXTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Metering 8 Substations FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitte : Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: ' mew e: ond U. Marshall, . . tie: Purchasing Agent Approvedi 92~ ger-. IV: o n J. Marshall, C.P.M. 1e: Purchasing Agent BID # 9467 BID 138 KV Line Tap (Page Rd. GENERAL WESTING- CLARK PRIESTER CUMMINS Substation) ELECTRIC HOUSE SUBSTATIO SUPPLY SUPPLY OPEN June 4, 1985 2 p.m. ELECTRIC ACCOUNT # SUPPLY CO. QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR 1 Lump Sum Price No Bid 172,847.0 217,496.0 No Bid No Bid a NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPHENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCOR- DANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, state law requires that certain contracts requiringg an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding $5,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and WHEREAS Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the dity Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Orders' attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT 67403 American la France f 4.140.00 68152 Southern Engine 6 Pump S 817)6.00 68224 Industrial International, Inc. S 31015.00 69355 LS.P.Jndu_tries S 3.924.00 69508 Sumain± Supplx S 7.Sd]_00 568568 t? Cummins Suen]Y S 1.378.27 68925 ~~d Fifavaiien 591.1591-195 _ PACE 1 SECTION II. That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated emploq*a is hereby authorised to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the require- ments of competitive bids. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _Ig _ day of June 1985. RICHARD 0, STEWART$ MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLUTTE ALLEN, CITY 5EMMTW CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE 2 DATE: June 18, 1985 CITY COUNCIL REPORT i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #67403 AMERICAN LAFRANCE $49140.00 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase to American LaFrance be approved for $4,140.00 for the repair of a water leak on fire truck 118. SUMMARY: The repair was necessary because of a water leak in the pump. The parts and labor are shown on their Invoice 1033003-00. They also had to replace seals and bearings in the transfer case at their Fort North repair shop. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order Copy Invoice PRCGRANS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Vehicle Maintenance FISCAL IMPACT: Repair b Maintenance Budget Account 1100-006-0051-8342 Respectfully submitted: • Chris r ng City Manager Prepared by: o n Marshall, C. .I . tle. Purchasing Agent Approved: ;me n rs a le: Purchasing Agent . ,O p~NTOFi~ 2115'L MANNEY ST.~ PURCHAJ,ORDER DEN Of~I, 76201 P. 7 NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TY b7401 bJ%Ob/2~8 C14 VENDOR ANE23000 SHIFT TO: AMERICAN-LAFRANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2560 WHITE SETTLEMENT RD ,CONFIRMATION ONLY FORT WORTH* TX 761 07 p0 NUT DUPLICATE ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER L UNITS NUMBER ` 'DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOU 7.1 710 004 0598 8710 1 118 REPAIR WATER LEAKS 59000" •1 r / The City of Dentonr Texas Is tax exempt • House 811I No. 20, TOTAL F P~n. ....err": /0" A aft NumbK Itwns Fieaived i~ Vouc NMr umbw cool . 1. `DUPLICATE INV& RFGL%IER NO. FOB SHIPPED M DATE NUMBER 774403 3176 FTW BW U3/23/85 MOW-( U TO SHIP TO CITY OF DEN70N DENTON VEHICLE MAINT DIV. ACCTS PAYAULE au4 TEXAS SYRELY 218 E MCKINNEY DENTON DE14TON TX 76201 TX 7 zoi )ER DATE DUE OA1E RE:tA4KS TERMS FOT OATS SHIPPED FROM 3/23/85 _I NET ON RECEIPT PPD U3/23/F3s -16 fEM PRODUCT Ulm ORDERED 010 SHPPED UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 10 INSTALLED UHAFT KIT N PUM . REPLACED 20 BEARINGS AND SEALS I TRANSFER CAS Em so 40 -127-1.53 PARTS 50 2868.75 LABOR 76.15 HRS. AT $740/0, 60 70 80 w**TNANKS*Nm G "RCMI T 1'0" AR'"-..':J-U1 V-PP-"CE F... C.;t 3'0354PA PA 15230 FINAL SHIt'MENT TOTAL 414U.213 PAST DUE. ACCOUNT BEYOND TEIAMS OF SALE SUBJECT TO FIT .UU 1.5% 0%18X PER ANNUM) MON76LY SERVICE CHARGE $ALI9 TAX • Ulf 15% MINIMUM HANDLING CHARGE ON ALL RETURNS. FREaHf .Ult NO RETURNS WITHOUT WRIVEN AUTHORIZATION OF YOUR REGIONAL SERVICE CENTER 41-tit).L.10 DATE: June 18, 1985 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #68152 SOUTHERN ENGINE & PUMP $89736.00 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase be approved to Southern Engine & Pump Co. for the purchase of two replacement pumps for the amount of $8,736.00. SUMMARY: This emergency purchase is for the purchase of two identical replacement pumps for the Cooper Creek Lift Statinn. This is one of those items that is an impossibility to predict when you will need them, and the pumps must work. We will have the old pumps repaired if possible for future use. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order Copy Delivery Receipt PROGRANS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Wastewater Treatment FISCAL IMPACT: Budget Funds #620-008-0470-8343 There is no impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitte : j4 r s Hartung City Manager Prepared by: ame $ o n rs a . . . Title: Purchasing Agent Approved: mes n , -31 ars a , itle: purchasing Agent G" OP DENTON$ TEXAS . 215 E. McKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76204 P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYF 05/03/85 S07 S VENDOR: SOU37001 SHIP TO: SOUTHERN ENGINE PUMP 'CITY nF DENTON* 2020 NORTH LOOP 12 W1W TREATMENT PLANT 1RVING9 TX 75207 1100 MAYHILL ROAD DENTON@ TX 76205 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN 01 620 008 0470 8343 2 FAIRBANKS MORSE PUMPS 6"X8" 8.736.00 02 620 008 0470.8343 2 MODEL 0 85413 The City of Denton, Texas Is lax exempt • House Bill No. 20. Reference P.O. Number on all 7o L FOR P.O j 8973600 BA., Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. Send InvoWse T0: Dlreot All Inquiries T0: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E McKinney St., Denton, TX 79201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent Phone 8171598.8223 81715988311 DIFW Motto 267.0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer • <; 's< ,'~<:4 MU USIA. , CITY OM OD' N"t TEXAS CAARIEN WALL FIAtIG T TO _ SCIICC 5_+P.O•, BOX 10105 OALLASv TEXAS U "s +r, a4yy^..R;``.•``PP_~;tr r r , t 1Nf~. CUNOIIfUNS la" N G 750 TUH it 1750 APM %T I .4 PuMP J i-dq IOdh'rI `''PWW0A4ANIC9 AND ' 011"IEN.SIONALLY INTE _CHIINGQAULE WITH i X3,11 4Q2372 I • ' ia.e ~.1) ~r' '7.30' . CM .'fir... p VEATACAL NON-CLOG MP LESS SUCTION FLpOM ..'4.. .ter +.1.L}`TJ .!.ar Y 1 ~ , f' 2 CHERGENCY ANULING Z~Z i r ~ u + out. o0-20-aa-`' TAX IfN/MOT NVM6[P1+74-0y09900-'J v J VV N • 0 ~ 4C 1••C1 if 1018 1111491 AAI I "I AAt OI.1Y 14 •/A~NYIACIYAIN IY111•I if MAYO I116 ■ANYIA(tY AfA IN CIw11MC1 ArIN 141410910101%14 of fps plot AAI N11 NiCA 1+Am it ON Mos TO o M Nv1~il so A•I •1 m3inI 11111 1 I 11 I WAIT or 6.11111 IRAN,}1AU1yN C•WANit111ttvf ICA MC ACNAN9AIQN •YDf1•ioll COPTI tl tnVilt N11YCAiii .04 iV AA1WiA ofmcm A VI ' ! fY2*1 ";PpY CII"Aa ..r N r , : U$1'MftT PE.R STANDAR0 TEANS 11111t+' PAGp O 1 • ~ ~AINAL PA GL- f 0!1/01 /Bi'ACKING UST FAIRBANKS MORSE PUMP DIVISION - DATE; June 18, 1985 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 168224 INDUSTRIAL INTERNATIONAL, INC. $39015.00 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase be approved for $3,015100. SUMMARY: This is for the emergency purchase of 300 feet of 18" sewer line to use at Hack Center. This size is not normally carried in stock; therefore, the emergency. 8ACKGROUfID: Purchase Order Copy PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Water A Sewer Field Service FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: ,a 40 z4t;o I ~6 rrss Hartung City Manager Prepared by: mes n J. Marshall, C.P.M. itle: Purchasing Agent Approvedt nte: o n Marshall 9Ttle: Purchasing Agent OF DONTON"T 216 E. McKINNEY ST. PURCHME ORDL-R DENTON, TX 79201 P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYP1 68224 08/20/95 C17 S IND52500 VENDOR: SHIP TO: INDUSTRIAL INTERNATIONAL INC. WATER & SEVER FIELD SERVICE P.O• BOX 14987 CONFIRMATION ONLY. RICHLAND HILLS,-TX 76117. DO NOT DUPLICATE ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN' 01 624 008 0471,9114 300 RT 18■ SEWER PIPE-.MACK CENTER 30015000 .ca The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. TOTAL FOR P•0. 3401S•00 Reference P.O. Number on all 811., Shipments and Involces. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as indicated, Send Invokes T0: DhvM All InquM6s TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney 5t, Denton, TX 78201 Toni D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent Phone 81716E6-t'i?23 817168t>•A311 D1FW Metro 297-0042 The City of Denton Is on equal opportunity employer DATE: June 18, 1985 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #68355 I.S.P. INDUSTRIES $3,924.00 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase order for repair parts for the old type water submergence flocculators at the Water Treatment Plant, for $3,924.00. These are parts that must be kept on hand at all times to repair or replace these chains. SUMMARY: The emergency purchase of these parts are of a one source nature. The old flocculators are old and the parts are not kept in inevntory any more. Therefore, we must keep thesc• at our plant to make the necessary replacement or repairs. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order Copy PRDGIUMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Water Production FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Repair 8 Maintenance #620-008-0460-8343 There is no impact on the General Fund. Respectfulat y submitted: a v4e:io Chris Hartung City Manager V Prepared by: ' *ho, fiarshall, C.A.M. itle. Purchasing Agent Approved: ~a .e ame: John J, Marshall, C.P.M. ' title, Purchasing Agent ITY>,~~ d~ p . 215 E. McKINNEY ST. PURCHASE OkDkR DENTON, TX 76201 P. 0. NUMBER DATEIVENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYP 68355 05/24/85 ~;o g 21172001 VENDOR: SHIP TO: I.S•P. INDUSTRIES CITY OF DENTON9 948 HIGH AVE Se W, WATER PRODUCTION CANTONS OH 44707 1701-8 SPENCER ROAD DENTON9 TX 76205 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN 01 620 008 0460 8339 4 2647 F7-JS-882 STR DRIVE CHAIN 19400000 02 620 008 0460 8339 4 CAST,IRON CHILLED RIM 49 TOOTH 19868.00 03 620 008 0460 8339 40*720PIT9 DIA.IS-882 SPROCKET 94 620 008 0460 8339 2 22-TOOT14 433 1/2 CICR SPROCKET 328.00 OS 620 008 0460 8339 2'22-TOOTH 433 1/2 CICR SPROCKET 328.00 The City of Denton, Texas is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. TOTAL. FOR Pe0• 39924.00 Reference P.O, Number on all 8/1, Shipments and Irrtolm. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. Send Invoices TO., Direct All Inquid" TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom 0, Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purilasing Agent Phone 8171566-8223 817!58&8311 DIFW Metro 267-0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer DATE: June 18, 1985 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 068508 CUMMINS SUPPLY RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order in the amount of $1,800.00 to Cummins Supply for 500 MCM unishield wire be approved. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the emergency purchase of 1500 feet of 500 MCM unishield power cable. The location of the electrical service required special long "pulls." Normally, this wire is warehouse stock. However, the necessary long lengths were not available. This was for the Mervyn's Installation. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order PROGRAMiS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution Underground Construction FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Working Capital 0110-004-0598-8108 Electrical Warehouse Inventory Respectfully submitted: -q 4 G. Chris Hartun City Manager Prepared by: -S Aukiz ng~:p ' Jdhn J. Marshall, C.P.M. tle: Purchasing Agent Approved: r ArMe ~ T John J. Marshall, C.P,M, Purchasing Agent CITY 0p 0 w 215 E. McKINNEY GT. PURCHASE ONDER DENTON, TX 78201 P. 0. NUMBER DATFIVENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPI 68508 05/24/85 C02 S CUMS6000 VENDOR: SHIM` TO: CUMMINS SUPPLY WAREHOUSE P.O. BOX 930 CONFIRMATION ONLY FORT WORTH• TX 7610t DO NOT DUPLICATE i ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOU 01 710 004 0598 8708 1500 FT•091906 CABLE SOOMCM tJNISHIE 7#800.00 CONFPMVON The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. FOR Poo. 79800.00 Reference P.O. Number on all BIt., Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indlcated. Send fnvolo" TO: DkW All In*dd" TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, O.P.M. Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, O.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent Phone 8171668 Z 8171588 8 Il i DtFW Metro 267-0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer DATE: 6-18-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #68517 CUMMINS SUPPLY RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order to Cummins Supply be approved in the amount of $7,378.27 for miscellaneous electrical connectors. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the emergency purchase of electrical connectors necessary to ever ize the newly constructed portion of the Golden Triangle Mall (Mervyn's). Several vendors were hunting this material for us. Cummins was the only vendor able to put the package together. This material was originally bid, approved and ordered on Bid 09452. The subsequent purchase order has been cancelled due to excessive delivery schedule. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution Underground Construction FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds Account 1610-008-0252-8333 Respectfully su:1mitted: 04 Chris arti44 94;0.0 mg City Manager Prepared by: Wee ~w 10 Iitle: Jo n J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent Approved: tie: John J. Marshall, c.p.m. Purchasing Agent ' efty, OF DIN 216 E McKINNEY ST. PURCHA8E ORDER DENTON, TX 78261 P. 0. NUMBER DATENENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYR 68517 ' 06/03/85 C21 CUM56000 VENDOR- SHIP TO: CUMMINS SUPPLY ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION P.O. BOX 930 CONFIRMATION ONLY FORT WORTH, TX 76101 DO NOT DUPLICATE ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOUN' 01 610 008 0252 8333 26 6S08LR ELBOW L *366.30 02 610 008 0252 8333 18 650 C AHJ -ADAPTER 173.70 03 610 008 0252 8333 17 600SIP INSUL PLUG 327*00 04 610 008 0252 8333 12 65OLRC40 CONNECTOR 142.20 05 610 008 0252 8333 18 6000P CONN PLUG % ,S97060 06 610 008 0252 8332 12 650CAHA ADAPTER 127.20 07 610 008 0232 8333 4.6505LR ELBOW " 231.20 08 610 008 0252 8333 13 60601P INSUL'PLUG.' 443.30 09 610 .008 0252 8333 I .AIR FREIGHT 660" 10 610 008 0252 8333 18 GSOLRC450 CONNECTOR 213*30 11 610 008 0252.8333 18 10TLHJ.ADAPTER SHIELD 59@56 ' 12 610 008 0252 8333 43 10TLHA!ADAPTER SHIELD 132.76 13 610 008 025.2 8333 LAIR FREIGHT 78e75 14 610 008 0252 8333 27 650 8LR le418.85 15 610 008 0252 8333 27 600 SIP 837.07 16 610 008 0252 8333 27 650LRC40 319,95 17 610 008 0252 8333 27 650CAHA 650055 CONFIRMATION The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. T OR Poo. 7.378.2T 1`1e1eror4e P.O. Number on all K .ShlDmonts and Involces. Shipments are F.O.B. City ul Denton, or as Indicated. send Invokes T0: DW M All Inqulrbs TO: City of Donlon, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Aset. Purchasing Agent Phone 81716888223 8171588-8311 DIFW Metro 287-0042 The Clty of Denton Is an equal oppodunlt employer r ~.~Ir a 14t" r z. • .1 Ewa DATE. 6-18-85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Mar.-.ger SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #68525 BOYD EXCAVATION RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order to Boyd Excavation in the amount of $21,125.00 be approved. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the emergency rental of two self loading scraper tractors including operators. These tractors are being used to dig a new pit for waste disposal at the landfill. We had planned to be able to cover incoming refuse and dig additional pits with our own equipment. Due to equip- ment failure and employee resignations and much heavier use of the landfill than anticipated, this was not possible. BACKGROUND: Copy of Purchase Order PROGRAMrS, DEPARRENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Solid Haste Landfill Operaticns FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds Account #631-002-0803-8502 Landfill Operations Special Services Respectfully submitted: a G. Chr s Hartung City lianager Prepared by: KpMe:N,1,'Jd'hn J. Marshall, C.P.M. itle:' Purchasing Agent Approved: tut~: o n J. Marshall, C.P.M. le: Purchasing Agent 2i6 E. McKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORD&I DENTON, TX 78201 P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYI 69525 05/31/85 SOLID iMASTE BOY49000. VENDOR: SHIP TO: e0YD EXCAVATING 3500 FT WORTH OR DENTON• TTX 76201, ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOUR 01 631 002 0803,8502 325 HRS SCRAPER,RiF:NTAL 219125a0C r. The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House 6111 No. 20. O FOR P*O♦ 21■ 125*0C Reference P.O. Nun-dyer on all B/L, Shipments and Involces. Shipments are F.O.B. Gty of Denton, or as Indicated. Sind Invokes TO: Direct All Inqulrl" T0: City of tknton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 70MI Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assl. Purchasing Agent Phone 817168644 81715868311 DIFW Metro 2874042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer DATE: ~IIBT$~": gjTY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 4-D TO: mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE INSTITUTING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ON A TRACT OF LAND APPROXIMATELY 361.708 ACRES IN SIZE SITUATED IN THE H. MAY SURVEY, ABSTRACT 807 AND THE V.E. GAILOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT 452 AND BEGINNING WEST OF FM 2164 (t!. LOCUST) APPROXIMATELY 7,000 FEET NORTH OF HERCULES LANE (A-16). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval by a vote of 7-0 at its meeting of May 8, 1985. SUMMARY: This is a voluntary annexation petition. BACKGR01'ND: Not applicable. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFECTED: Mere are no existing structures or reaidences. FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined RespeT,~,fu subs t d: }r~fj ~ G. Chris Hartung City Manager Pr ared y : David Ellison Senter Planner Approve Jeff Meyer Director of Planning and Community Development 11838 1043E NO. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 361.71 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE V. E. GAILOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 452 AND H. MAY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 807r DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL A DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose cn the day of , 1985 in the Council Chambers for all Interested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearingg held for that purpose on the day of , 1985 in the Council Chambers for all-I-ntereated persons to state their views 1 and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least one time to the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECT104 I. That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is mede hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may ' hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorsta pert of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as follows, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the V. E. Gailor Survey, Abstract 452 and the M. May Survey, Abstract 807 and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as described in Ordinance No. 74-36, Tract 111, said point lying 500 feet west of and perpendicular to the center line of FM 2164, said point also lying south 0°29'36" west 1,142.57 feet and north 89°54'04" west 450.01 feet from the intersection of the vest right-of-way line of FM 2164 with the south boundary line of the T. Polk Survey, Abstract 999; THENCE south 0°29'36" west, 500 feet vest of and perpendicular to the center line of FM 2164 and along the said present city limits, a distance of 2,129.77 feet to a point for a corner; A-16/HAMME'I"T 6 NASH, INC./PAGE ONE THENCE north 88°43'00" west, a distance of 4,354.46 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 1°02'00" east, a distance of 993.3 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 88°36'00" west, a distance of 2,456.0 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 21°06'00" west, a distance of 160.0 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 0°40'22" east, a distance of 2,074.48 feet to a point for a corner in the north boundary line of the said M. May Survey and the south boundary line of the J. M. Stewart Survey, Abstract 1150; THENCE south 89°11'35" east, along said survey lines, a distance of 3,402.51 feet to a point for a corner, THENCE south 0°35'$3" west, a distance of 1,190.83 fact to a point for a corner; THENCI south 89°54'04" east, a distanca of 3,427.71 feet to the place of beginning and containing 361.71 acres of land, more or less. SECTION II. The above described property is hereby classified as Agricul- tural "A" Uistrict and shall so appear on the official zoning map of the City of. Fenton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Introduced before the City Council on the + day of 1985. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of 1985. RICHARD 0. OK CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CRULOTTE r CITY XKY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOWL: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY. A-16/HAMMETT L NASA, INC./PAGE TWO PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an are.z which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOI;'.D BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: I. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, streat markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'fexes. E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation, Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the pre--nt city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconsl:ruct!on and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, constructio" of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will bo accomplished under the established policies of the city. G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning, and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area. I. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city. J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. X. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning*, in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. t I y i l Y •r i ti 'y I.XX A-A tt r ~a t.. - - -FM, 2164 a: t . .I a 14 1 5 ~ ~r • r P 4 Z Minutes May 8 198S Page 9 S. A-16. Petition of Hammett 4 Nash, Inc. for annexation of "'I tract approximately 361.708 acres in size situated in the H. May Survey, Abstract 807, and the V. E. Gailor Survey, Abstract 4S2, and beginning west of FM 2164 (North Locust) approximately 7,000 feet north of Hercules Lane. STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that a formal petition was made or annexation, that a request for a zoning change has been discussed but no immediate development is antici- pated. He said that apparently people feel that policies may change and properties outside city will not be served by city utilities. On question, Mr. Ellison said that the loop is located about 3,000 feet north of this site. On further question, he stated that if property develops the city could have a leap frog situation, that developer would have to extend utilities. He continued that since . no development is planned at present time, staff does not feel annexation would be detrimental and it is probably not a bad idea to annex property before development occurs. DECISION: It was moved by Ms. Cole, seconded by r. a orte and unanimously carried (7-0) to recommend approval of A-16. 0 Y A-16 ANNEXATION SCHEDULE April 08, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item April 090 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up ✓1pril 16, 1985* City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing may, 01, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle v May 03, 1985 Publish notice and mailout May 06, 1985 Submit city council agenda item May 07, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up may 08, 1965 Planning tnd Zoning Commission makes recommendation v' May 14, 1985* City Council holds public hearing s/ May 15, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle r/ May 17, 198' Publish notice and mailout v May 200. 198S Submit city Council agenda item v May 21, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up ✓May 280 1985* Special called meeting of ti.t city Council for second public hearing t/Juno 10. 1985 Submit City Council agenda item June 11, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up June 18, 1985* City Council institutes annexation proceedings June 20, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle June 23, 1985 Publish ordinance July 15, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item July 16. 1985 Submit city council agenda back-up July i3, 1985* Final action by City Council at special called meeting *Denotes action by the City Council 09641 June 18, 1985 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: Consider Dallas/Denton Untreated Water Purchase Contract. RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of April 10, 1985, recommended approval of subject contract. SUMMARY Denton and Dallas have been negotiating for a fairly extensive time on an untreated water purchase contract. Denton has continued to purchase water from Dallas at rates as established for Dallas' untreated water customers (36.72/1,000 gals.) The major features of the contract are: Denton contracts to purchase untreated water from Dallas. Term of Agreement- 30 years. Denton and Dallas agree that dependable yield of Ray Roberts is 76 MGD, Denton's share 19.76 MGD, Dallas' share 56.24 MGD. Yields during filling are established. Dutton is allowed to overdraft Ray Roberts. A readiness - to-serve provision which requires Denton to purchase a minimum of 500,000 GPD. A five year contract backout provision. An operating agreement for Ray Roberts Lake. No sewer effluent return requirement. Approval to serve Corinth, Argyle, Hickory Creek and Shady Shores. Tentative approval to use Dallas water to serve other cities. 3639U:4 Credit for 4.81 of all sewer effluent into Elm Pork below Ray Roberts. Credit for 261 of all sewer effluent into Elm Fork above Ray Roberts except Gainesville, which is 1.81. A rate methodology based on actual costs plus rate of return of Dallas' imbedded interest rate plus 1.51. Restriction on allowing inferior water into Ray Roberts, i.e., Texoma. 't'here are many substantial benefits to the contract, but also some risks. The major benefit is the assurance of a long-term water supply from the Dallas system which will. probably be the least expensive water in the future unless Texoma water were to be use-A. Denton will need an additional water supply by 2005-2010 and it would be almost impossible to secure such a source in 20 years. The contract is designed to allow Denton to have the flexibility of purchasing water from Dallas or developing Denton's own supplies. There is a risk (cost) in the readiness-to-serve clause and the cost to reinstate service after Denton's water use exceeds approximately 24 MGD plus some minor risk in the ratchet clause. However, these are not considered major in the overall context of the entire water contract or total costs of water supply. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton Utility Department, City of Dallas and possibley regional communities. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract assures Denton a long range supply o water at reasonable rates. a Res 49Y b i ted: G.Ghris Aartung City Manager Prepared by: R. E. Nelson Director of UtilitiesName APPR VED: e son Director of Utiiities EXHIBIT I Proposed Contract Ordinance Minutes PUB Meeting of 4/10/85 3635U:5 I 1122E NO. A FOR THE PURCHASE OF N ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT,E AND PROVIDING LFOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Denton is desirous of purchasing untreated water from Dallas and Dallas desires to sell entreated water to Denton pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in the attached agreement; and WHEREAS, the Public Utility board for the City of Denton has recommended approval of tha attached agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HPREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, approvaa the attached agreement for the purchase of untreated water from the City of Dallas. SECTION It. That the Mayor and the City Secretary, respectively, are authorized to execute and attest the attached agreement. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985. EWARTj MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN Cl My CITY OF DENTON,9TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON I , TER~AS/ BY: 0J t THE STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF DALLAS ) UNTREATED WATER PURCHASE CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT made and entered into this the day of , 19850 by and between the City of Dallas, Texas,' hereinafter called Dallas, and the City of Denton, hereinafter called Denton. WHEREAS, Dallas and Denton presently own certain water rights in an existing water reservoir, Lewisville Lake; and WHEREAS, Dallas and Denton have agreed to jointly construct Ray Roberts Lake; and WHEREAS, Ray Roberts Lake, when constructed, will be integrally operated in conjunction with Lewisville Lake; and WHEREAS, Dallas and Denton desire to agree on operation and respective yields of Dallas and Denton from Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake during and after the filling of Ray Roberts Lake; and, WHEREAS, Denton's share of the yield in Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake may not be adequate to satisfy Dent,)n's requirements for untreated water; and WHEREAS, Denton is desirous of purchasing untreated water from Dallas, and Dallas desires to sell untreated water to Denton as set forth herein under the terms and conditions herein stated; NOW, THEREFORE, Dallas and Denton in consideration of the terms, covenants, and conditions herein contained, hereby agree as follows: I W I T N E S S E T H: 1.0 WATER SALES 1.1 Dallas agrees to sell to Denton untreated water to meet requirements of Denton subject to the terms and conditions herein provided. 1.2 The sale of untreated water to meet the requirements of Denton may be subject to and limited by available system supply. The determination of availability rests with the Director of Dallas Water Utilities. However, such sale shall not be unreasonably 1 withheld and such limitation shall consider only untreated water supply availability. 2.0 GLOSSARY 2.1 Annual Average Draft: Total annual withdrawal averaged over the year. Withdrawal limitations refer to annual averages, not to instantaneous rate. 2.2 Conservation Pool Storage Capacity: The water storage capacity between certain lake levels which is designated for water supply. 2.3 Conservation Withdrawals: Water released or pumped for water supply from a surface water reservoir. 2.A Critical Drought: The most severe period of water shortage experienced by Dallas and Denton during the historical record of hydrologic measurements. The Critical Drought of record as of the signing of this contract occurred from 1950 to 1957. 2.5 Existing Lewisville Lake: Lewisville Lake prior to the construction and gate closure of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project. The top of the conservation storage pool is 515 feet mean sea level (msl). 2.6 Dependable Yield: The maximum annual demand that could be supplied continually every year without shortage from a surface or ground water resource. 2.7 Filling Period: The time from completion and gate closure of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project to when impoundment of water is sufficient to fill the Project Storage capacity. 2.8 MGD: million gallons per day. 2.9 Overdrafting: Withdrawing water at a rate greater than the dependable yield of the lake. 2.10 Pro ect Storage Capacity: The project storage capacity is defined to be the total storage in Ray Roberts Lake (top of conservation pool 632.5 feet msl - estimated initial capacity 799,600 acre feet) and the storage in Lewisville Lake from 515 to 522 feet msl (estimated initial capacity 177,600 acre feet) for total storage of 977,200 acre feet. 2.11 RaY Roberts Incremental Project: A project constructing Ray Roberts Lake (previously known as Lake Aubrey) in the watershed of Lewisville Lake. Tha yield of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project is 76 MGD greater than the existing Lewisville Lake. The 2 project provides conservation storage capacity in Ray Roberts Lake and increases conservation storage capacity in Lewisville Lake. 2.12 Sedimentation: The gradual settling of soil particles washed into the lake. Over time, this process may reduce the conservation pool storage. 2.13 Nator Budget Method: A conservation of mass equation which can be solved for lake inflow. For the purpose of this contract, the equation is: Change in Storage - Inflow + (Precipitation - Evaporation) x (Lak(, Surface Area) - Withdrawals - Spills 3.0 DEPENDABLE YIELD SHARES 3.1 Dallas and Denton hold water rights in Lewisville Lake premised on annual rights to impound and divert water from Lewisville Lake. Water rights have not affixed the diversion authority based on the dependable yield of Lewisville Lake. Dallas and Denton agree that Dallas' share of the dependable yield of Lewisville Lake is 95.1835 percent and Denton's share is 4.8165 percent. Dallas and Denton agree that these yield shares are predicated on Venton not withdrawing, as Denton's yield share, more than 1584.10 million gallons per 365 day year, or 1588.44 million gallons per 366 day year, exclusive of effluent return consideration, from the existing Lewisville Lake. Provided, however, that if yield shares are recalculated in accordance with Section 3.40 Denton's maximum annual withdrawals would be subject to revision based on such recalcu)ation. Denton's share tf the dependable yield in terms of MGD is calculated and listed in Exhibit A, attached to and made a part of this Contract. It is agreed that as of year 1980, the dependable yield of Lewisville E,aks is 90.2 MGD. Dependable yield does not include consideration of effluent return. Denton's authority to withdraw additional untreated water from Lewisville Lake in consideration of effluent returns is provided by Section 16.2 and Exhibit A of this Contract. 3.2 Denton agrees that although Denton has a permit to impound and divert an additional 255,320 acre feet per annum from Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake after Ray Roberts Lake is completed, the year 2000 incremental dependable yield derived from constructing the Ray Roberts Incremental Project shall be 76 MGD, and that this yield shall bu divided 26% to Denton (19.76 MGD) and 74% to Dallas (56.24 MGD). 3.3 For purposes of determining the annual amounts of water for which Denton will make payment to Dallas under this Contract, it is agreed that Denton's share of the dependable yield of Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake and Denton's annual share of the effluent 3 return shall be calculated by rounding dependable yield on a daily or annual basis to two decimal places. 3.4 Recalculation of lake yields shall be accomplished when: A. a more severe drought than the Critical Drought of record occurs in the Lewisville Lake watershed. B. either Dallas or Denton beli_ves that changes in the watershed or lake capacities have resulted in significantly different lake yields. In this event, the party contending that a change in yield has occurred may, at its own expense, employ a mutually agreeable consulting firm to update inflows or lake capacities for yield recalculations. Provided, however, that Denton and Dallas may agree that Dallas will perform yield recalculations. All lake dependable yield recalculations shall be determined by the following method: i. The dependable yield of Lewisville Lake with top of conservation level 515.0 feet will be recalculated as though Ray Roberts Lake did not exist. This calculation establishes the base dependable yield for the original allocation of water rights in Lewisville Lake. ii. The incremental dependable yield of Ray Roberts Lake will be recalculated by applying the principles and methods used to derive initial incremental dependable yield incorporated into this Contract. Tha criteria utilized in the initial Ray Roberts Lake incremental dependable yield determination is attached as Exhibit G. 3.5 During the Ray Roberts Incremental Project Filling Period Denton and Dal'.as shall share in the available dependable yield of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project on the basis of Denton's 26% and Dallas' 74%. The available dependable yield shall be based on the full project dependable yield of 76 MGD and the highest storage level previously attained in the project storage. The project storage shall be calculated uoing year 2000 lake capacities as follows: A. Determine elevation of Lewisville Lake and calculate storage in Lewisville Lake. B. Determine the elevation of Ray Roberts Lake and calculate storage in Ray Roberts Lake. 4 C. The 1coject storage is the sum of A above and B above less the Uwisville Lake capacity at elevation 515, but in no case shall the project storage be less than zero. 3.6 The largest value of project storage previously attained shall be used to calculate the available yield as follows: Y X - 8.44 11,481 Y - the incremental yield in MGD. X - the largest project storage volume previously attained in acre feet. For values of X less than 96,860 acre feet, the value of Y - 0 For values of X greater than 969,500 acre feet, the value of Y - 7 The equation is valid for values of X greater than 96,880 acre feet and values of X less than 969,500 acre feet. The above relationships are derived based on project storage being proportional between Ray Roberts Lake and Lewisville Lake. Exhibit B is a graphical representation of the above equation. The current project storage volume shall be determined on the first work day of each month. 4.0 OVERDRAFTING 4.1 Denton acknowledges that overdrafting of the Elm Fork by Dallas is premised on Dallas' having a multiple reservoir system and that when Dallas overdrafts a reservoir, there is a commensurate underdraft of other reservoirs. 4.2 During the Ray Roberts Incremental Project filling period, Dallas shall not overdraft on an annual brsis from Lewisville Lake or Ray Roberts Lake in amounts greater than it would have if Ray Roberts Lake had not been constructed. 4.3 Dallas shall not overdraft the Ray Roberts Incremental Project and Lewisville Lake to the extent that Denton's dependable yield is diministied. 4.4 Denton does not, at the effective date of this contract, have a multiple Lystem of reservoirs. However, Denton does own and operate water wells of sufficient yield which can be used as an alternate source of water supply in the event of a Critical Drought and may in the, future acquire other surface water resources which 5 E. can be utilized as alternative sources for purposes of overdrafting. Dallas and Denton agree that Denton may overdraft the Ray Roberts Incremental Project when the incremental Ray Roberts storage is more than half full. The Incremental Ray Roberts storage is calculated by determining the storage that would have been in the existing Lewisville Lake and subtracting this amount from the current total two lake (Lewisville and Ray Roberts) storage. The methodology for calculating the storage that would have been in existing Lewisville Lake is outlined in Exhibit H. Renton shall underdraEt when the Ray Rob~arts Incremental Project is less than halt full. The, amount of the Denton draft when the Ray Roberts Incremental Project is below half full is to be determined by calculating the average amount of Denton draft from the time the storage was full until it reaches half empty, (excluding previous periods when below half full) and entering the graph contained in Exhibit H with this amount and reading the Denton draft below half full i;n the axis. Provided, however, that Denton will have an independent consultant provide a study to validate the dependable yield of Denton's alternative water resources including surface supplies and the water wells that are to be drafted, in lieu of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project, when the Ray Roberts Incremental Project is below half full. Dallas will be provided with a copy of studies validating the dependable yield. The initial study findings shall be validated at ten year intervals. In no event shall Dallas be obligated to supply Denton with additional untreated water where Denton's additional requirements arise from inadequate planning of Denton 's overdraft or failure of Denton's water wells to produce adequate volume to compensate for diminished yield resulting from Denton being required to underdraEt the Ray Roberts Incremental Project when less than half full. 5.4 DEMAND: CHANGES IN DEMAND 5.1 "Demand" means the maximum average annual amount of untreated water, expressed in MGD, to be withdrawn by Denton from Dallas' rights within a Water Year. "Water Year" means the year beginning June 1 and ending May 31. Exhibit C is Denton's projected water usage and demand for untreated water on which this Contract is based. 5.2 Denton shall give annual notice in writing to Dallas of Denton's demand for untreated water for the coming water year by submitting a revised Exhibit C. Such notice shall be given at least ninety days in advance. The Director of Water Utilities of Dallas may waive the ninety day notice requirement for good cause shown. 6 i 5.3 In the event Denton withdraws more than the agreed demand for untreated water from Dallas' rights in a water year as listed on the annually revised Exhibit C, Denton agrees to pay for such additional water at the same rate per 1000 gallons as established in provision 10 of this contract. 5.4 During the term of this Contract, Denton's ucuiand from Dallas in any water year shall not be less than the highest demand in any previous water year, effective at the beginning of the Water Year, following the availability to Denton of at least 10.3 MGD of water for its withdrawal from the Ray Roberts Incremental Project. Provided, however, that when Denton exercises its options with the U.S. Government for the additional increments of their right from the Ray Roberts Incremental Project, it shall be recognized that Denton's demand for water purchased from Dallas under this Contract will potentially drop to zero. In that event, the condition proviuing that Denton's demand shall not be less than the highest demand in any previous water year shall not be effective as to the additional increments until Denton's water purchases under this Contract exceed 1.0 MGD. Denton shall notify Dallas in writing when it decides to exercise its option for any additional increments. 5.5 Denton agrees that Dallas' capability to provide increases in demand is subject to available supply of untreated water. The determination of availability rests with the Director of Dallas Water Utilities. However, providing additional supply shall not be unreasonably withheld. 6.0 DIVERSION POINT, METERING, ETC. 6.1 Dallas agrees to sell untreated water contracted for by Denton at diversion point(s) as delineated in Exhibit D attached hereto and at such additional points as may be mutually agreed upon by both parties. Dallas acknowledges the acceptability of the current Denton metering facility at Lewisville Lake. The cost of all maintenance or reconditioning of the existing metering facilty and all future metering facilities, whether delineated in Exhibit D hereof or mutually agreed ul+on at a later date, shall be borne by Denton. Unless otherwise mu+-.ually agreed to by Dallas and Denton, Denton shall be responsible for the design, contracting, construction and financing of metering facilities. All designs, materials and specifications shall be mutually agreed to by Dallas and Denton. Plans shall be submitted to Dallas for review and comment. All metering and diversion facilities shall be designed, constructed and operated in accordance with standard industry pr@ctices. Meters shall conform to American Waterworks Association Standards, where such standards exist. Denton agrees that Dallas has the right to make periodic inspections during the construction 7 phase of the br4tering facilities. Final approval of completed metering facilities is subject to the mutual agreement of Denton and Dallas, 6.2 Denton agrees to provide ingress and egress for Dallas employees and agents to inspect and test metering facilities owned by Denton. 6.3 Denton will be responsible to insura each meter will be operated and maintained se as to record with commercial accuracy, Denton shall employ a professional meter testing firm, acceptable to Dallas, to test such meters annually and shall invite representatives of Dallas to observe such tests. Dallas has the right to request a meter to be tested. The cost of such requested test shall be borne by Dallas if the test reveals the meter was operating within :.,ianufacturer's specifications for accuracy. 7:0 BOOKS AND RECORDS 7.1 Dallas agrees that Denton or its agent may have access to the books and records of Dallas Water Utilities at reasonable times. Denton agrees that Dallas or its agent may have access to the books and records applicable to Denton's Water Utilities at reasonable times. 8.0 ADDITIONAL SURFACE WATER SUPPLIES, 8.1 If Denton develops oc acqu`, addit vnal surf :e water supplies other than Ray Roberts Lai a Lewisville Lake from any source other than Dallas, resulting in seduced demand from Dallas, then Dallas is released from the obl 3tijn r supply the demand amount determined according to provisi J.0. in such ,vent Dallas may adjust its supply obligation to levels ~mmensurate with Denton's reduced demand. 8.2 If within the term of this Contract Denton ceases to take water from Dallas because such other 4 rface water supplies have been developed or acquired, Denton may, at the option of Dallas, fot five years from date of notification by 'ter.on of intent to reduce o: cease taking crater, or the balance of this Contract, whichever ist less, remain liable for charges at the most Lecent annual billing level in effect at such cessation. Dallas shall consider whether a direct or indirect liability has been incurred on Denton's behalf in determining whether to hold Denton liable for charges. i 9.0 F.::SALE 9.1 Denton agrees not to sell water purchased from Dallas to 8 i i any person or entity outside Denton's current water service area or areas for which the State of Texas Public Utilities Commission has issued Denton a "Certificate of Convenience and Necessity", as may be adjusted from time to time, unless Denton has received prior written approval from the Director of Water Utilities of Dallas. At the effective date of this Contract, Denton's water service area includes Denton, Argyle, Corinth, Hickory Creek, and Shady Shores. In granting such authorization, Dallas may establish the terms and conditions of the conveyance of such water including, but not restricted to, the setting of monetary rates for sale of such water. Such control over terms, conditions and rates by Dallas shall not be unreasonable and shall relate primarily to the untreated water component of such sales. "Convey" means sell, trade, donate, exchange, transfer title, or contract therefor. Dallas agrees not to sell treated or untreated water to customers in Denton's service area without approval from Denton. -4: 10.0 RATES AND PAYMENT 10.1 Rates charged Denton shall be established by ordinance of Dallas. 10.2 Denton understands that Dallas City Council has the right by ordinance to revise the rates charged, from time to time as needed, to cover all reasonable, actual and expected costs. The Director of Water Utilities of Dallas will furnish Denton a draft copy of the Cost of Service Study for proposed rates thirty (30) days prior to submitting a rate increase request to the City Ccu<<cil of Dal:.as. Any revision of rates shall be pursuant to principles set forth in Exhibit E, attached hereto and made a part of this Ccntract. Any revision of Exhibit E, according to its terms and not in conflict herewith, shall automatically be incorporated and become a part of the contract. Dallas shall give Denton a minimum of six months notice of intent to revise rates. 10.3 Unnton agrees to provide Dallas with comments, if any, in regard to the cost of service study within twenty (20) days after receipt. 10.4 Denton agrees to give Dallas a minimum of thi.rty (30) days notice of intent to protest rates or any other condition of service. Provided, however, that Denton is not reqjired '.o give 30 day notice of intent to appear before Dallas City Council to protest cost of service studies. 10.5 Denton shall pay Dallas for water withdrawals in excess of the sum of Denton's: (A) dependable yield share of Lewisville Lake and the Ray Roberts Incremental Project; 9 (B) share of effluent returns to Lewisville (4.8165%) and Ray Roberts Lakes (2f%), but see Exhibit A pertaining to calculation of Gainesville effluent returns; and (C) overdraft of Lake Ray Roberts. 10.6 Dallas agrees to render a statement of charges monthly. Payment is due upon receipt of statement Denton agrees to pay within fifteen (15) days of receipt of statt. ,t. 10.7 In the event a mef_er is discovered malfunctioning, then the amount of water that has passed through the meter will be estimated for each day the meter has not functioned correctly. The last correctly meaSLred monthly consumption will be used as a basis for mutually calculating the amount of water delivered to Denton during the time the meter has not been functioning correctly. 11.0 READINESS TO SERVE 11.1 When the Ray Roberts Incremental Project has filled sufficiently for Denton to begin withdrawals from their share of the Incremental Project, Denton's purchases of untreated water from Dallas are expected to gradually diminish. These withdrawals are anticipated to occur in 1987, but the actual date will vary, depending upon construction schedules and weather conditions. 11.2 In 19Q0, it is anticipated Denton will have sufficient untreated water available from their combined rights in Lake Lewisville and Lake Ray Roberts to meet Denton's normal water requirements. If so, Denton may not need to purchase any untreated water from Dallas in those years when Denton's demand roan be satisfied from Denton's own untreated water rights. However, due to unusual weather, ultimate population growth or other unanticipated conditions, Denton may need t. purchase from time to time supplemental untreated water from Ciilas. Due to this potential need, Denton desires for Dallas to maintain sufficient reservoir capacity so as to be ready to meet Denton's dei:iands for untreated water in the years that Denton's untreated wester rights are not adenuate to meet Denton's needs. 11.3 In consideraC?nn of Dallas' agreement to obligate reservoir capacity to Teet Denton's potential, varyi,.g demands for untreated water, Denton agrees to compensate Dallas for its cost in providing cal3city on a readiness to seevs basis, as provided _n Paragraph 11.4. 11.4 The charge for readiness to serve shall be ;lased on Dentnn's expressed average annual demand for untreated water purchases from Dallas, as established by proloisio•. 5.0, its actual purchases from Dallas, or .5 MGD, whichever is greater. Provided, 10 however, that Dallas shall not be obligated to supply more than 2 tives the amount of water which Denton has purchased from Dallas in the first of the five years preceding. 11.4.1 The readiness to serve charge shall become effective at the beginning of the water year following Denton's initial withdrawal from the Ray Roberts Incremental Project. 11.5 The annual readiness to serve charge shall be prorated over It months and billed monthly. 11.6 In the event Denton is required to pay for a greater quantity of water than is actually withdrawn from Dallas' rights, the difference between the quantity actually withdrawn and the quantity that Denton is obligated to pay for under provision 11.0 shall be billed at the prevailing ordinance rate minus a year-end credit that excludes the variable costs included in the prevailing ordinance rate. 12.A CURTAILMENT 12.1 Denton agrees that if water supplies are curtailed within Dallas, Dallas may impose a like curtailment on deliveries of water under this contract to Denton. Such curtailments shall be limited to the extent that such supplies and service are curtailed due to untreated water supply availability and giving recognition to the fact that Denton diverts water from Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake and supplies and provides all of its own untreated water transportation. Denton will cooperate by imposing conservation measures upon its sales. 12.2 Dallas and Denton agree to develop wateL conservation plans which incorporate loss reduction measures and demand management practices designed to insure that the available supply is used in an economically efficient and environmentally sensitive manner. Upon request, Dallas or Denton will furnish a copy of its conservation plan to each other. 12.3 To the extent Dallas imposes restrictions or grants privi:eyes of general applicability to itself and customer cities, including rules relating to the curtailment of water delivery and availability, Dallas agrees to impose such restrictions and :grant such privileges equitably and in a non-discriminatory fashion. Such restrictions or privileges shall take into consideration Denton's ownership of water rights -Nnd untreated water diversion and transmission facilities. 13.0 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT 13.1 An Operational Agreement between Dallas and Denton for operation of Ray Roberts Lcke and Lewisville Lake, attached hereto 11 777777and marked Exhibit F, is made a part of this Contract. Any revision of the Operational Agreement, according to its terms and not in conflict herewith, shall automatically be incorporated and become a part of this Contract. . 13.2 Denton agrees to be bound by any amendment to the Operational Agreement if it is a signatory to such amendment. 14.0 FORCE MAJEURE; INDEMNITY; REMEDIES; NO WARRANTIES 14.1 If, for any reason, not reasonably within the control of the party so claiming, either party hereto shall be rendered in whole or in part unable to carry out its obligations under this Contract, then that party's obligation shall be suspended during the continuance of the inability then claimed, but for no longer period. Such party shall endeavor to remove or overcome such inability with all reasonable dispatch. 14.2 Dallas makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the character, quality or availability of the water to be taken and Purchaser agrees to assume all such risks, accepting said water, if available, in the same state as it is pumped from the designated diversion points; nor does Dallas make any representation that such water will be suitable for the purposes for which Purchaser desires to use it. Dallas shall not be liable in any event for the nonavailability of water hereunder, the unsuitability of such water or its quality, or the inability of Dallas to perform any obligation under this Contract for reasons beyond its control,, including rules or regulations of ether governmental agencies. 14.3 Denton agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Dallas whole and harmless from any act or omission of any representative, agent, customer, employee, and/or invitee of Denton; and to defend and hold ,Z)allas whole and harmless against any and all claims for damages, costs, and expenses that may arise out of, or be occasioned by this Contract to any of its activities unless said damages result from the negligence of Dallas. Except for those things described and disclaimed in Paragraph 14.2, which are expressly excluded from this indemnity, Dallas agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Denton whole and harmless from any and all claims for damages, costs and expenses occasioned by any negligent act or omission of any representative, agent or employee of Dallas ari31ng solely {ut of the operation of any facilities owned by Dallas and used under this Contract, unless said damages result from the negligence of Denton. 14.4 Recognizing that Dallas' and Denton's undertaking as prpvide~i in this Contract are obligations, the failure in the performance of which cannot b-2 adequately compensated in money damages, Dallas and Denton agree that, in the event of any default, 12 the other party shall have available to it the equitable remedy of specific performance in addition to other legal or equitable remedies which may be available to such party. 15.0 WATER WELLS 15.1 Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to impair or affect Denton's right to use its ~,xisting water wells or any water wells it may drill in the future. 16.0 SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES 16.1 Denton agrees to maintain adequate sewage treatment facilities to meet its needs and provide for any increased quantity of wastewater flow. 17.0 EFFLUENT RETURNS 17.1 Treated effluent returns to Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Laka are not considered in determining the dependable yield of Lewisville Lake or Ray Roberts Loke. Dallas, however, recognizes the existence of effluent returns and acknowledges Denton's right to share in increased untreated water availability attributable to effluent returns, provided Federal, State or other governmental agencies do not appropriate or otherwise restrict the use of effluent returns. As of year 1980 until the beginning of the first water year following the effective date of this Contract, Denton may include .2 MGD as their share of untreated water available as a result of effluent returns to Lewisville Lake. Shares of effluent returns following the beginning of the first. water year after the effective date of this contract shell he determ:ned or redetermined under conditions specified in Exhibit A. 18.0 SALE OF SHARES IN PROJECT 18.1 Denton and Dallas agree that naither party shall sell their percentage share, or any part thereof, in the Ray Roberts Incrementrl Project to any other municipality, corporation public or private, partnership, association, person or other entity, without first giving the other party the right to purchase such conservation storage in said reservoir at the original offered price, provided that the offer presented to Denton is a firm offer to purchase in writing. 13 7.1 19.0 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 19.1 Special provisions applicable to this Contract are attached hereto and styled Exhibits A through H. These Exhibits are incorporated herein, as if copied word for word. Exhibit A delineates Denton's yield and effluent return from Lewisville Lake as of 1980. Exhibit H delineates the available yield of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project during the filling period. Exhibit C is Denton's Projected Untreated Water Usage on which the sales portion of this contract is based. Exhibit D delineates Denton's diversion point. Exhibit E is the Wholesale Untreated Water Rate Princip 4s . Exhibit F is the Operational Agreement Between Dalla3 and Denton for Lewisville Lake and Ray Rnherts Lake. Exhibit G is the Reservoir Yield Criteria used in the Ray Roberts Lake incremental yield determination which will also be used in yield recalculations. Exhibit H is the graph and calculation procedures which determine Denton's draft of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project when half empty. 20.0 TERM 20.1 This Contract shall remain in force and effect for a period of 30 years from the date of execution of the Contract. Provided, however, Denton may terminate this Contract if uentcn develops additional surface water supplies and cea3es to take water from Dallas subject to provision 8.0, in which event Denton may be liable to Dallas in accordance with provision 8.0. 21.0 VENUE 21.1 The parties herein agree that this Contract shall be enforceable in Dallas, Texas, and if legal action is necessary to enforce it, exclusive venue shall lie in Daila3 County, Texas. 14 22.0 NO VERBAL AGREEMENT 22.1 This Contract contains all commitments and agreements of the parties hereto and no verbal or written commitments shall have any force or effect if not contained herein. 23.0 APPLICABLE LAWS 23.1 This Contract is made st,'iject to all applicable laws of the State of Texas and the United States. 24.0 CON'T'RACT INTERPRETATION 24.1 In interpreting the various provisions of this Contract in a Court of Law, any said court having jurisdiction shall apply the laws of the State of Texas to interpret the terms and provisions of this Contract. 25.0 CAPTIONS 25.1 The caption, to the various clauses of this Contract are for informational purposes only and shall not alter the substance of the terms and conditions of this Contract. 26.0 NOTICES 26.1 Any notice required under this Contract shall be given to the respective parties at the following addresses by Certified Mail, postage prepaid: Denton, Dallas: City of Denton, Texas City of Dallas, Texas Attn: City Manager Attn: City Manager 215 E. McKinney City Hall, 1500 Marilla Denton, Texas 76201 Dallas, Texas 75201 EXECUTED as of the day of , 1985, on behalf of the City of Dallas by its City Manager, duly authorized by City Council Resolution No, 85- , adopted on , 1985, and countersigned by its City Controller, attested by its City 15 al 1 r. v r " lrr ~1 r Secretary, and approved as to form by its City Attorney; and on behalf of the City of Denton, by its duly authorized officials, APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF DALLAS ANALESLIE MUNCY, City Attorney CHARLES S. ANDERSON, City Manager Fly By Assistant City Attorney Assistant City Manager Submitted to City ktlow CI:"v OF DENTON ATTEST: By City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney 8868K 16 I EXHIBIT A Calculation of Denton's Share of Effluent Returns A. Formula Percentage Share of Dependable Yield X Effluent Returns to Lewisville or Ray Roberts Lake (MGD) MGD Share of Effluent Return in Lewisville or Ray Roberts Lake (')Percentage shares of dependable yield are delineated in conditions 3.1 for Lewisville Lake (4.8165%) and 3.2 for Ray Roberts Lake (26%). (')Effluent returns at the effective date of this contract shall be returns of the cities of Denton and Gainesville. Shares of the Gainesville effluent return shall be based on 1_:, the average annual level of Gainesville contribution for the three most recent years (October thru September) effective at the end o° September in the first year of gate closure of Ray Roberts Lake shall be multiplied by the Lewisville Lake yield share. This number, once established, shall be a constant for the calculation. 2. the level. of Gainesville contribution during the October through September period of years following Ray Roberts Lake gate closure minus the constant calculated in 1. above times the Ray Roberts Lake yield share shall be added to 1. to determine the total of Denton's share of Gainesville effluent return. In the future other cities having a wastewater discharge in excess of .5 MGD will be included for the purpose of this calculation provided the discharge can be validated as contributing to water availability from Lewisville Lake or Ray Roberts Lake commensurate with the recorded discharge. B. Conditi.ons of Calculation All effluent returns shall be considered to be to Lewisville Lake until the beginning of the water year following Denton's commencement of withdrawal of its share of available yield from the Ray Roberts incremental Project. If wastewater discharges for cities other than Denton and Gainesville aLe included in the effluent consideration, they shall be calculated as being in consideration for return to either Lake Ray Roberts or Lake Lewisville based on the watershed areas for the appropriate reservoir. A-1 ~,T Z7 77 Effluent return data shall be obtained from reports submitted by the cities to the Texas Department of Water k:esources. Calculation of the annual consideration shall be based on the October thru September reports. C. Sample Calculations (Hypothetical Data - Assuming Gainesville Three Year Average Annual Discharges Prior Lo Ray Roberts Fate Closure, of 1.5) 1. Lewisville Lake (Prior to Ray Roberts Gate Closure) .048165 X *4.7 0 .23 MGD, 2. Lewisville Lake + Ray Roberts Lake Constant = .07 MGD .048165 X **1.7 = .08 MGD .26 X ***1.2 0 .31 MGD .46 MGD (*Denton and Gainesville Discharge to Lewisville Lake) (**Denton Discharge to Lewisville Lake) (***Gainesville Incremental Discharge after Ray Roberts Gate Closure) 8868K A-2 RAY ROBERTS INCREMENTAL PROJECT YIELD FILLING PERIOD 80 ~ I I I I , I ~ I I I I ~ I 1 i ~ I , I --I-- ---I-- ---r-- -1--- --1--- --T--- - - I 70 I I I I I I I 1 F ! _L_ _ _ I - I - I _ 1 I 76 D , I I I I ~ I ` 1 60 ~ I I I I , I ~ I } I I ~ I I 1_--- 1 I , I 50 I i ~ i I I I I I I ~ ~ 0 I I I ' I I ....I_~ 1 I I H I I I I y !11 l '18.44 1 I y, --r --I-- --r- ----r- - --r I-__ 1 1 I I I forj 9600 <I x< 969, P00 I ~ ' ~ I I I I 30 - -r- - I I I I I 6 I I j j I forix < 969$80, 01 ---I-- --t- --y-- --p- - i--- I I i ~ I I I , 20 I ~ I I I I I I I { , I I I I I I I ' I I ~ I I I 1 I 1 I , 10 - _-_1_~ _.t___~ _ ! 96180 9694500 f--- - I- - : i I R I Storage I I I I I I 100 200 300 400 S00 600 700 800 900 1000 L Project Storage (1000 Acre Feet) , NAAWr EXHIBIT C DENTON'S PROJECTED WATER USE AND DEMAND DENTON RAY LEWIS- EF''LUENT SUPPLY TOTAL YEAR ROBERTS VILLE RETURN TOTAL DALLAS REOMT YEAR 1985 0 4.3 .5 4.8 5.5 10.3 1985 1986 0 4.3 .5 4.8 6.0 10.8 1985 1987 0 4.3 .5 4.8 6.5 11.3 1987 1988 5.0 4.3 .6 9.9 1.9 11.8 1988 1989 10.3 4.3 .6 15.2 0 12.3 1989 1990 10.3 4.3 .6 15.2 0 12.9 1990 1991 10.3 4.3 .6 15.2 0 13.5 1991 1992 10.3 4.3 .6 15.2 0 14.1 1992 1993 10.3 4.3 .7 15.3 0 14.8 1993 1994 10.4 4.3 .7 15.3 0 15.4 1994 1995 11.1 4.3 .7 15.3 0 16.1 1995 1996 11.8 4.3 .8 15.4 0 16.9 1996 1997 12.6 4.3 .8 15.4 0 17.7 1997 1998 19.8 4.3 .8 24.9 0 18.5 1998 1999 19.8 4.3 .9 25.0 0 19.3 1999 2000 19.8 4.3 .9 25.0 0 20.2 2000 2001 19.8 4.3 1.0 25.1 0 21.2 2001 2002 19.8 4.3 1.0 25.1 0 22.1 2002 2003 19.8 4.3 1.1 25.2 0 23.1 2003 2003 19.8 4.3 1.1 25.2 0 24.2 2004 2005 19.8 4.3 1.2 25.3 0 25.3 2005 2006 19.8 4.3 1.2 25.3 1.2 26.5 2006 2007 19.8 4.3 1.3 25.4 2.3 27.1 2007 2008 19.8 4.3 1.3 25.4 3.6 29.0 2008 2009 19.8 4.3 1.4 25.5 4.8 30.3 2009 2010 19.8 4.3 1.5 25.6 6.1 31.7 2010 2011 19.8 4.3 1.6 25.7 7.5 33.2 2011 2012 19.8 4.3 1.7 25.8 8.9 34.7 2012 2013 19.8 4.3 1.7 25.8 10.5 36.3 2013 2014 19.8 4.3 1.8 25.9 12.1 38.0 2014 2015 19.8 4.3 1.8 26.0 13.7 39.7 2015 YEAR: 1985 (To be revised each water year in accordance with provision 5.2) 8868K L Y .f• p...,. IT ~ 1. Viciasts o! Diversum Point ilw4801664 JwI►+r 'k 14A 0 V ;I, • ~ 1 ! IMF . • . I ~ • ,r • , t 1 i . , • • • w.~ . • , - • f ~ i 4 V • 1 • ~ f 1 • 1 Jr ~ r 1 . •1 \ i .rrwr •w r ~ t Divenion Point f 89.30'Ng 1,330 + i TIM ARM ,1 ~ . X11 u. Etas~oad survey X44 rsr Abstract 0330 3~%,• a<I~er pvk 'i",t Denton county, Tx, ' V rte. ~ \ it ~ " • I~ a w qe, N e+ _ C #61 X" v'v Kt ~ 1, Denton anticipates at some time is the future locating a diversion point on Ray Roberts Lako• At such time as the actual location of the proposed diversion point is knovnP this Exhibit C shall be modifiad. EXHIBIT E WHOLESALE UNTREATED WATER RATE PRINCIPLES 1. Key Rate Setting Principles a. Revenue requirements are to be determined on the utility basis, at original cost. b. Rate of Return - imbedded rate of interest on water obligations plus 1.5*. C. Reservoirs - All existing and future reservoirs in a common rate base with untreated water customers as a class paying their proportionate share of costs for reservoir storage, including a portion held for future use. Costs allocated to untreated water customers shall be adjusted from tame to time according to changes in actual usage. d. Untreated Water Transmission - Allocation of costs between untreated water customers and treated water customers based on test period usage. e. Other Administration - Allocated on the basis of the above allocations. f. Rate Design - One-pact rate (volume). 2. Cost-of-Service Studies Cost-of-Service studies to establish wholesale untreated water rates shall be conducted by Dallas. Such studies will be conducted in conformity with standard utility rate-making practices and subject to review, but not approval of, a rate subcommittee composed of designated members from the wholesale water customers of the City of Dallas. At least one member of the subcommittee shall be from an untreated water risstomer .ity. ~yv t r ~ n ,..e r.-sf sti •r r fe f hXHIBIT F OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN DALLAS AND DENTON FOR LEWISVILLE LAKE AND RAY ROBERTS LAKE 1. Purpose The purpose of this agreement is to provide a basis for the joint operation by Dallas and Denton of Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake. 2. Water Supply Releases Dallas and Denton agree that Dallas shall act as spokesman for Dallas and Denton to the Corps of Engineers, in behalf of both Dallas and Denton, in requesting all water supply releases from R•.y Roberts Lake and Lewisville Lake. Ten days after written notice to Dallas and the Corps of Engineers, Denton may assime the role of spokesman for Denton's share of o•ater supply releases and management of its storage in Ray Roberts and Lewisville Lake. Releases made from Ray Roberts Lake in accordance with the minimum release: schedule in the Memorandum of Agreement between Dallas, Denton and the United States of America sh,il be shared proportionately between Dallas (74%) and Denton (26%) When Dallas is operating the reservoir and acting as spokesman to the Corps of Engineers in behalf of Denton, Denton shall advise Dallas weekly of water releases to be made in Denton's behalf. Dallas recognizes that Denton plans to install hydroelectric generating units on Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake and agrees to give consideration in making water. releases from the reservoirs for beneficial use of the hydroelectric units. Dallas and Denton shall formulate conditions for water releases from the reservoirs that accommodate Denton's need for water for hydroelectric generation and conditions pertaining to compensation for any value realized in utilizing water flows from Lewisville and Ray Roberts bakes for the purpose of generating electric power by a separate document. However, primary consideration in operating the reservoirs and scheduling water releases from the reservoirs shall be maximization of dependable yield, conservation of water and efficient operation of the reservoirs. F - 1 3. Withdrawals Denton agrees to withdraw from Lewisville Lake on an annual average basis, an anount at least equal to Denton's dependable yield share of the existing Lewisville Lake plus 18% of Denton's dependable yield share of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project, providing Denton's requirements for water are sufficient to require such withdrawals. Dallas and Denton agree that they shall operate Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake as a reservoir system and, during the filling period of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project, Dallas withdrawals from this system shall be limited to the withdrawals Dallas would have made if the Ray Roberts project had not been built. The Dallas schedule for withdrawals from existing Lewisville Lake is specified in the Dallas Reservoir Operations Guidelines. During the filling period of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project, Dallas' maximum release will be based on what the level of Lewisville Lake would have been if Ray Roberts Lake had not been built. This level wrll be determined by hydrologic study. After the filling period of the Ray Roberts Incremental Project, Dallas shall be allowed to overdraft Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake. Dallas agrees that Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake shall be operated such that Denton will be able to withdraw its share of the dependable yield of Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake and its water demand from Dallas, estabished according to provision 5.0, thro,ighout a Critical Drought period. 4. Water Quality Each city agrees to strive to prevent a degradation in water quality in Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake resulting from that city's actions. Dallas and Denton agree that they wi:l not divert water from other sources into Lewisville Lake or Ray Roberts unless Dallas and Denton mutually agree to the proposed diversion. Such agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld. 5. Joint Operating Committee A joint operating committee consisting of representatives from Dallas, Denton and Lewisville shall be organized for the purpose of periodically meeting to discuss and, if necessary, formulate conditions of operation for the Lewisville and Ray Roberts reservoirs. F--2 ~ a n~ .q, r 0. ~ I -,a ~ yv .fA. °~`n 7t ti' v y Meetings shall normally be convened semi-annually during the months of March and September. Denton shall be represented by its City Manager and/or Director of Utilities. Dallas shall be represented by its Director of Water Utilities or his designated representative. Lewisville shall be represented by its City Manager and/or Superintendent of Water Production and Wastewater. 6. Approved Changes Changes in this Operational Agreement may be made by mutual agreement in writing of Dallas and Denton at any time. i i i E - 3 I 8868K EXHIBIT G GUIDELINES FOR CALCULATING THE INCREMENTAL RAY ROBERTS LAKE YIELD This Exhibit G provides the initial methodology for calculating a yield approximating 76 MGD to be used as a starting point for any future recalculations of yield due to a drought more severe than the Critical Drought of record or due to changing conditions within the lakes or watershed. The following methodology calculates a yield of 75.7 MGD, which is considered close enough for recalculation purposes. Any future recalculated yield will be multiplied by the factor 1.00396 to correct for the discrepancy. Guidelines for Yield Calculations 1. Calculations involve determining the additional yield derived from the existing Lewisville Lake (Lewisville with conservation top at 515 feet) by adding the incremental storage of the Ray Roberts Lake Project. These calculations will involve only Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lake without regard to the Dallas system. II. The initial part of the calculation is a routing of the existing Lewisville Lake throughout the Critical Drought of record (October 1950 to April 1957) as outlined below. A. The hydrological data for year 2000 conditions which were used as a basis for the Financial Feasibility Study for Aubrey Reservoir' routings will be used. These data are published in the Long Range Water Supply Study for, the City of Dallas', except that (1) inflows will be modified to represent year 2000 conditions by averaging the year 1980 ind year 2050 inflows, and (2) lake capacity tables will bn modified to represent year 2000 conditions by interpolating between 1980 and 2050 capacities. The computer program data used in the Financial Feasibility Studio foi Aubrey Reservoir has been provided to Denton and is permanently filed by Dallas with the feasibility study. 0. Return flows and lowest usablo lake levels will be the same as those used in the Financial Feasibility Study for Aubrey Reservoir. C. Lewisville will be drafted at the overdraft rates specified in the preliminary 1983 DWU reservoir operation guidelines, attached hereto, except that the top level of overdraft (178.8 MGD for Dallas plus 14.6 MGD for Denton and Lewisville) will be continued until the storage is 25% depleted (509.6 feet) and the second level of overdraft (118.0 MGD for Dallas plus 14.6 MGD for Denton and Lewisville) will be continued from 25% depleted '0 K i 1 to 50% depleted (502.3 feet). Below 50% depleted, the lake will be drafted at its remaining dependable yield (the maximum rate which can be sustained by the remaining Lewisville Lake pool until the end of- the drought). Annual drafts will be distributed to months by the monthly demand factors used in the Financial Feasibility Study for Aubrey Reservoir routings. III. The second part of the calculation will be a Critical Drought (October 1950 to April 1957) routing of enlarged Lewisville Lake and Ray RoberL•s Lake. The year 2000 hydrologic data used in the Financial Feasibility Study for Aubrey Reservoir routings will also be used for this routing. The specifics are outlined below: A. Ray Roberts Lake will be drafted at an annual average rate of 85 MCD until the conservation storage becomes two-thirds depleted. Thereafter, it will be drafted at its remaining dependable yield. We Thy, Ray Roberts Lake draft will be added to the inflow to the neri Lewisville Lake. C. The drafts taken from the existing Lewisville Lake in the routing described under II above will be taken from the new Lewisville Lake in this routing. D. The additional yield which can be supplied throughout the drought by the new Lewisville Lake will be calculated as part of this routing and will represent the incremental yield of the incremental Ray Roberts Lake Project. 'Final Resort - Financial Feasibility Study for Aubrey Reservoir - For the Cities of Dallas and Denton Texas, LWFW, Inc. January 1980 'Resort on Long Range Water Supply Study to Meet Anticipated Requirements to the Year 2050 for the Clay of Dallas, Texas, URS/Forrest and Cotton, Inc., March 1975 A Attachment 1 EXHIBIT G PRELIMINARY 1983 DALLAS WATER UTILITIES - RESERVOIR OPERATION GUIDELINES Based on current reservoir conditions and keeping in mind that these guidelines are flexible and that emergency, water gJality, or maintenance requirements may dictate other operations, the reservoir system will be operated at least cost within the following general guidelines: ELM FORK FLOOD WATER Whenever flood water i-s available in the Elm Fork, use to the maximum extent possible. FRAZ=R DAM Water loss over Frazier dam should be minimized. The operational target elevation should be one foot below the wier crest at 407.0 feet. LAKE GRAPEVINE Above elevation 531.5 - Considering external restraints, use as required, up to annual average of 22 MGD for Dallas. Between elevation 531.5 and 528 - While between these limits restrict to annual average of 14 MGD for Dallas, external restraints allowing. Below elevation 528 - Restrict to annual average of 7 MGD for Dallas, external restraints allowing. LAKE LEWISVILLE Above 512 - Considering external restraints, use as required, up to annual average of 179 MGD for Dallas. Between elevation 5:2 and 509 - While between these limits, restrict withdrawal to 118 MGD annual average for Dallas, external restraints allowing. Below elevation 509 - Restrict withdrawal to a MGD annual average necessary to supply system demands, after maximum utilization of East Side Water, external restraints allowing. iS~Y 'Y fY' •I L10 w y M1' i?: LAKE HUBBARD Above elevation 433.5 - Considering external restraints, maximize usage up to'annual average of 80 MGD. Between elevation 433.5 and 432.0 - Take East Complex system needs as required from Hubbard up to 80 MGD, after taking at least 80 MGD from Tawakoni. Below elevation 432.0 - Draft as required to supply the needs of the East Side Complex after Lake Tawakoni has been drafted at annual average of 135 MGD. LAKE TAWAKONI Use as required, up to a maximum annual average of 164.8 MGD. These guidelines are based on a projected annual average water 6mand of 264 MGD and a hydrological sequence from 1920-76. The above incorporates the Dallas City Council Action of May 15, 1979. These guidelines will be revised and superseded as conditions warrant. 8868K 4j T •°,i L•J'INr a. .1i[, ti. I iY.,. M, EXHZ DENTON, OVERDRAFT OF AAY RO8M t INCREI4N['AL BROOJEC? so 50 ` ao _ r 0 20 10 _ 0 5 10 15 20 25 Zq • DINTON DRAFT IN SOTrom HALF 04GD) GAAytl :~1'BOSOtAG7t t. ttudy l (Aubrey feulbulty 16 no teeetatas ytelf after the !toll) Lmovtll■ and say 6tera4e le 1664 th, A toll full Roberts 6ta4attoae vere um. to ealeutated. Is Am additional draft use te• t, The teduetlee to y.eld duriatl pe6ed on Lwttvtll6 and Rey the critical drouf it to 6ubr taberts vhus the Ray Roberts t""eted tree coat$its ylald. tatreeeatal stories vu auwe Ulf full$ (taetae4tal stor- S, The re"Watl arm at to the ate to the total 1wt&64 to aaitatA dealt %1 ee to a• the tw taker a"" the haw titled vhM t6er6 "tat star. 44 that veuld have beat la ns is loo thu oil (ult. L Moville it Ray !aborts had set ben bout.) (Exhibit H - Page 2 of 2) Calculation of Existing Lewisville Storage (If Ray Roberts Had Not Been built) 1. Using the Water Budget Method, calculate the inflows into Ray Roberts Lake and Lewisville Lake for each month since the two lakes were simultaneously full. 2. Starting with the simultaneously full month, begin monthly simulations of the existing Lewisville Lake storage without Ray Roberts Lake with the following reservoir gains and losses: A. Inflows will be the sum of Lewisville and Ray Roberts inflows calculated in 1 above. H. Withdrawals will be the Dallas withdrawals plus (i) Dallas untreated water sales and (ii) Denton's yield for Lewisville Lake as determined under guidelines in exhibit A. C. Precipitation will be the best available precipitation for the lake surface. D. Evaporation will be estimated from the Grapevine Dam evaporation pan. 3. Continue calculations in 2 above until the month in question is reached. 8868K 2 M INUTES • PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING APRIL 10, 1985 City of Denton Service Center Training Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Roland Laney, Leonard Herring, Edward Coomes, John Thompson, R.E. Nelson STAFF PRESENT: Ernie Tullos, C. David Ham, Charles Cryan, Paulette Owens-Holmes, John McGrane OTHERS PRESENT: None ABSENT: G. Chris Hartung, Nancy Boyd Meeting was called to order by.Director, R.E, Nelson, at 7:35 p.m. 1. CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THB PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING A motion was made by Thompson to approve tae Minutes as written. Second by Coomes, Motion carried. 2. CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD PLANNING 1 s Coomes made a motion to accept the Minutes as written. Second by Thompson. Motion carried. 3. CONSIDER DENTON DALLAS UNTREATED WATER CONTRACT Nelson reviewed the final draft of the Denton/Dallas Water Contract with the Board. He advised that the contract was for 30 years, but had backout provisions if Denton obtained other water supplies. He advised that Denton would be obligated to buy a minimum of 500,000 gallons per day, that the agreed safe yield of Ray Roberts was 76 million gallons per day, and that Denton would et credit for 4.81 of its effluent return to Lewisville. Agfter discussion, Coomes moved for approval of the contract, Thompson seconded, four ayes, no nayes, motion carried. 4. CONSIDER BID OPENING FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 485-WP-1 `-'Ham presented the item indicating that the bid is the lowest received at $433,000, The bid is below the projected cost of $440,000 for the project. The Board expressed its pleasure at a project coming in below projected cost. Thompson moved to approve the bid for $433,000 to Advance Tank, second by Coomes, four ayes, no nayes, motion carried, 36370:1 NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SALE OF 0.144 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE DOCUMENTS TRANSFERRING TITLE THERETO; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton is the owner of real property as described herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it would be in the best interest of the City to dispose of said property; and WHEREAS, in accordance with state law, public notice of the intended sale of said property was given, and bids were calicited and received; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed such bids and accepted the bid of Charles Struthers, said bid being the highest bid received for the property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASt SECTION I. That the sale of that certain real property owned by the City of Denton, as shown in the survey attached hereto, is hereby approved in accordance with the bid submitted by Charles Struthers, in an amount of Two and No1100 Dollars ($2.00) per square foot., being Twelve Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Eight and No/100 Dollars ($12,568.00) for all of said property, said property being more tarticulacly described herein as follows: All that certain tract of land situated in the W. Loving Survey Abstract Number 159 in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, being a part of that certain tract of land described in the dead from Louenge N. Markham et al to the City of Denton, Texas recorded in volume 596 paga 83 of the Deed Records of, Denton County, Taxes (as recognized and occupied on the ground) end being a part of that certain tract described in the deed from M.P. Crowder and Joseph B. Moore to the City of Denton, Texas recorded in volume 99 page 230 of the said Deed Records, as recognized and occupied on the ground; the subject tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING for the Northwest Corner of the tract being described herein, at an iron cod found at the intersection of the centerline of the said Crowder/Moore to Denton tract with the existing East Line of Carroll Boulevard; THENCE South 81°12'34" East with the said centerline a distance of 88.11 feet to an iron cod set for the Northeast Corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 02°24'04" West with the remains of an old fence most of the way and with the apparent and occupied East line of the said Markham to Denton Tract most of the way a distance of 10.26 feet to a fence corner post at the Southeast Corner thereof in the North line of Offenbacker Addition in the said City according to the plat thereof recorded in cabinet C page 14 of the Plat Records of Denton County, Texas; As PACE 1 THENCE North 87°16'10" West along a fence and with the apparent and cccupied South line of the said Markham to Denton Tract a distance of 90.00 feet to an iron rod set at the Northwest Corner of the said Offenbacker Addition in the existing East line of Carroll Boulevard; THF3CE North 03°24'12" East with the existing East line of Carroll Boulevard and severing the said Markham to Denton tract a distance of 70.36 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 0.144 of an acre of land. SECTION It. That upon receipt by the City of Denton of the amount stated above, the Mayor is authorized to execute a deed conveying title to said property to Charles Struthers. SECTION 111. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985.' MIGM0 0. STEWARTb MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: h, CITY OF DE14TON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOViTCHs CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE 2 j~t Tat,a SIAM66 ft re" C~7dZrrS'T:-S~►`.T ~'~C~►.'~l~T.eS~.Tr': r1-~'I.~\'~lnT'".T•. i The otat a of arms, Jaaattg of DErrroN Xtullm All Ana 6g A tor f rrHrnig: That The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation t of the County of Denton and State of Texas for and in considera tion of the sum of Tvelve Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Eight S No/100---- DOLLARS to it in hand paid by Charles K. Struthers and Karen A. Struthers I~ of the County of Denton and State of Texas the receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, does , by these presents BARGAIN, SELL, RELEASE, AND FOREVER .A t { QUIT CLAIM unto the said Charles K. Struthers and Karen A. Struthers, their heirs and assigns, all its right, title and Interest is and to that certain tract or parcel of land lying is the County of Denton , State of Tom. described as follows, to-wit: IAll that certain tract of land situated in the W. Loving Survey Abstract :Number 759 in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, being a part of that certain tract of land described in the deed from Louenge N. Markham i let al to the City of Denton, Texas recorded in volume 596 page 83 of the IDeed Records of Denton County, Texas (as recognised and occupied on the ;ground) and being a part of that certain tract described in the deed from iM.P. Crowder and Joseph B. Moore to the City of Dentoo, Texas recorded in volume 99 page 230 of the said Deed Records, as recognized and occupied .{on the ground; the subject tract being more part lcul:Irly described as (follows: BEGINNING for the Northwest Corner of the tract being described •i ~hersin, at an iron rod found at the intersection of the centerline of the ,said Crowder/Moon to Denton tract with the existing East Line of Carroll Bouiavard; THENCE South 87'12'34" East with the said centerline a "!heroincdescribedl trfeet act; toTHan iron roi set for tha ENCE South 02°24'04" West with t the Corner the ,lan old fence most of the way and with the apparent and occupied East line of the said Markham to Denton Tract most of the way a distance of 70.26 ,feet to a fence corner post at the Southeast Corner thereof in the North Iline of Offenbackar Addition in the said City according to the plat ,thereof recorded in cabinet C cpaaa 14 of the Plat Records of Denton .County, Texas; THENCE North 87 16'10" West along a fence and with the ,apparent 'distance ofd90 00 feet to an iron rod t got said d the rNorthwest Denton Tof the ;said OffenbackeAddition in the existing East line of Carroll Bculsvard; 'THENCE North 03v241121' East with the existing East line of Carroll Boule- vard and severing the said Markham to Denton tract a distance of 70.36 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 0.144 of an acre of land. 1 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, together with all and singular the rights, privileges f and appurtenances thereto In any manner belonging unto the said Charles K. Struthers and Karen A. Struthers, their heirs and assigns forever, so that neither the said City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation, its successors j not assigns MMMs, nor any person or persons claiming ender it shad, at any time hereafter, have, claim, or demand any right or title to the aforesaid premises or appurtenances, or any I put thereof. IYITNESS our hand at Denton, Taxes this clay of A. D. 19 89 Witness at request of Grantor; THE CITY OY DENTON TEXAS i i ATTEST: .w...... 8Yt &AM'9 ...AL,;...OITY...3TCRZTA3lY... GlTYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 10, 1985 TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer SUBJECT: Wade Mizers Contract The contract being requested for Wade Miser is to allow the many projects currently doing asphalt paving to be inspected properly. Timing on these projects has made many of them finish at the same time. With Mr. Miser watching the asphalt paving, the other inspectors have been able to handle regular inspections much quicker and with better attention to detail. Mr. Mizers many years of experience in asphalt have already proved to be of immense benefit to the City of Denton. Please consider this request seriously to allow us to continue proper inspections. J r y a k C E eer is 10292E 7T2 , NO. AN ORDINANCE APIAOVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND WADE MISER, PROVIDING INSPECTION FUNCTIONS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it is in the bee: interests of the City of Denton to retain the services of Wade Miser to perform inspection functions for the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36(f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all e.:penditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW1 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HERESY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves and authorizes the Mayor and City Secretary to execute and attest, respectively, the agreement between the City of Denton, and Wade Miser, to perform inspection functions for the Public Works Department under the terms and conditions contained in said agreements which are attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION It. Teat this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 19E3. KICHARL) 0. MAYOR CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: iu'aLR E S O L U T I O N WHFREAS, Zane Lemon has requested that Pembrooke and Lynhurat Streets at the intersection of Pennsylvania and Longridge, public streets within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas bn temporarily closed to public vehicular traffic between the hours of 3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on June 29, 1985, for the purpose of Eaving a neighborhood block party; and WHEREAS, Zane Lemon has assured the City Council thee all residents in such block have agreed to the temporary closing of Pembrooke and Lynhurat Streets at the intersection of Pennsylvania and Longridge; and WHEREAS, Zane Lemon has further assured the City Council that no alcoholic beverages will be served at the above-mentioned block party; i NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS: SECTION I. That Pembrooke and Lynhurat Streets at the intersection of Pennsylvania and Longridge, public streets in the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas be temporarily cloned to vehicular traffic frosr the hours of 3:Ob p.a. to 9:00 p.m. on June 29, 19850 for the purpose of having a neighorhood block party. SECTION 11 i That the City Mansger shall direct the appropriate City Department to erect barricades at Pembrooke and Lynhurst Streets at the intersections of Pennsylvania and Longridge at 3:00 p.m. on June 299 19851 and to have the same resoved at 9:00 p.m. on said date. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of June, 1985. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i ATTEST: i CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: i DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I BY: j ~1 ` rY c 1~ 'i E o~• d1 t~lcrWt~c` Opt, ob,~ ;i 3 ~y,~ao~ t ? j° pm, ACT~ 1 'not ~fU..~~~1.~•~l•-., O)L 1 i s . 1113L R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Denton has established and maintained a Public Library for the use of its patrons; and WHEREAS, the services provided by the Library enhance the quality of life of the individuals that utilize said services and of the residents of the City of Denton and the County of Denton; and WHEREAS, the public libraries throughout the County of Denton provide services to County residents and the providing of such services necessitates funding; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OR DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. The City Council of the City of= Denton, Texas hereby supports the concept of County funding for public libraries so that all libraries located within Denton County can be accessible to all County residents. SECTION II. The Council further would encourage and support the funding of public libraries throughout the County at a level that supports the services provided by each 'Library for the residents of the County, and specifically, t.hv Council would encourage the Commissioners of the County of Denton to support the funding concept developed by the County Library Committee which provides for County funding by the Denton Public Library in the amount of $123,188.00 for the 1985-86 fiscal year. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985. RICHARD 0. STEWARTO MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS `I ATTEST: kf I f CHM-rIL ALLEN I CITY SECIMTARY CITY OF DENTON,TEXAS kPPROVED AS TO LEM FORM: DEBRAOAD M!DR YTVEXASH, CITY ATTORZ-!Y BY., R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the term of office for Place 4 of the City of Denton, Texas on the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency will terminate July, 1985; and WHEREAS, Richard 0. Stewart was heretofore appointed by the City Council of the City of Dentun, Texas to Place 4 on the board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency and has since been serving as a Director, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. Pursuant to the terms and provisions of Ordinance No. 75-22 of the City of Denton, Texas, Richard 0. Stewart is hereby appointed to the two year term of office to Place 4 on the board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency. The term of office beginning July, 1985 and ending July, 1987. SECTION 11. This Resolution shall become effective :=om and after its date of passage, and it is so ordered. PASSLD AND APPROVED this the 18th day of July, 1985. F.1 CHA D , HX= CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: tMMTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY I ~LS$ v J 7RIC SeMn j the citie:of Bryon. Denton. Gariand & Gmnville, CItY May 30, 1985 Mr, Chris Hartung, City Manager City of Denton 215 E, McKinney Denton, TX 76201 RE: Board Member Appointment Dear Mr. Hartung: Our records indicate that Mayor Richard Stewart's term as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency will expire during the month of July, 1985. After the City Council reaches a decision on this matter, ploase send me a certified resolution specifying the person selected to represent your City on the TMPA Board of Directors. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, Wanda M. Callahan Assistant Secretary Board of Directors wmc . Tone MoWfeiral Pwae Ali" P.O. lot 7006 Sqm. Tarr 7703 (109) 073.301) DATE: 6/18/85 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council (f(///,' FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE SURREY RIDGE ADDITION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning COmmissior, recommended approval of the preliminary plat at its meeting of May 22, 1985. SUMMARY: The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. BACKGROUND: This plat conforms with the amended site plan for the Planned Development (PD-90) located north of Kings Row, northeast of Yorkshire Drive and east of Sherman Drive. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact on the general fund. Respec,Ku 99ubm t : G. Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared by: Cecile Coeson Urban Planner Approv d: R,. To eyes- c- Director of Planning and Community Development 1028a 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18, 1985 SUBJECT: Preliminary plat, of the Surrey Riage Subdivision SUMMARY: This tract is 56.65 acres located north of Kings Row, northeast of Yorkshire Drive, and east of Sherman Drive. This tract is shown in the S. McCracken Survey, Abstract 817, Denton, Texas. The property is part of a planned development (PD-90) and the development of a community service area and residential housing is anticipated. City services and faciiitiej, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste are available. The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ALTERNATIVE; Denial of the plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat CA . b t.akpA-yl~ Cecile Carson Urban Planner 11968 / N - 1 • I • I r 1 ' ' ' ~OCACt7 ~(.f0 [iI l4i' taw. WA IAOWVWW~ SWOON' ^W 1 1 Kr rov. 9l1146I0, [M;T Awl warp" 1 ~ 111 M ,F ~ •Iy~ mo, .00 I-C 91 ' 11 IIY 111 II / • 1 • I J ~J • A ; , 1+~ - A 1 1 I • 111 , / /b \ dw lNJ 01 6 l 1 ✓ f~ I 1, r ~LV Y- II 1 t 1 1\.' /pw~flr~yl~l~■b J.. !'.r of Mrs • ~ 1 I T -T '-Sr , 1 wwlnf.r. NMfMw.nllr I,. 1 110 t- - 7 r Il y 11 ~dYt t,■ if AN M a r s• r r to / ■.II I fwtl r 11 W M1 Y I V t ft mw ~ f ■rWn r a r rr CAI, It rift Nita awls A'Awl ~,W,,dmo VIM= It M I,w w ~ ~ Yr~Yy 1'rI 74 t i; -b'' P Z Minutes May 22, 1985 Page 14 III. CONSIDERATIONS A. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF THE SURREY RIDGE SUBDIVISION. (UNAPPROVED) STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson explained this is an approxi- iua e y acre tract located north of Kings Row, northeast of Yorkshire Drive, anal east of Sherman Drive, property is part of PD-90 and development of a community service area and residential housing is ^nticipated. Development Review Committee recommends approval. PETITIONER: Mr. Davis stated that they have worked closely with staff on design of plat, they have changed streets numerous times to accommodate needs. He said it will be an attractive neighborhood. DECISION: Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of pre- im narv and final plat of the Surrey Ridge Subdivision. Seconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried (6-0). i DATKI June 18 X585 Cam. COUNCIL REPORT FORT g 'L0. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager SUBJECT: RECEIVE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the Five- Year Capital Improvement Plan and Utility Capital Improvement Plan. SUMMARY: The Planning and Zoning Commission held its public hearing to receive input on the Capital Improvement Plan on April 17, 1985. Drainage improvements dominated the requests for future program years. The recommended plan places emphasis on traffic and transportation improvements in the 1985-86 p:ograa year. Funds for improvements to US Hwy 380 were shifted to the 1989-90 year program because little action by the highway department is anticipated in the immediate future. BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing for input was held on April 17, 1985. A work nession was held on May 1, 1985 to develop a recommendation. A formal recommendation was side on play 221 1985. FISCAL IMPACT: All non-utility projects listed beginning with the 1986-87 program year will require a bond election. Respef f4usubaitb4d- 0. 3/y~' Chris Hartung City Manager Prepared1by: David Ellison Senior Planner Apps ed~.~ Jeff Moyey Director of Planning and Community Development 1215g 61! n+i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 18. 1985 SUBJECT: Receive the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for the five year Capital Improvement Plan SUMMARY: The Planning and Zoning Commission is forwarding its recommendation for the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan after holding a public hearing on April 17, 1985 and developing a recommendation at a work session on May 1, 1985. The attached plan was formally recommended for acceptance at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 22, 1985. The recommended funding schedule reflects a Planning and zoning commission consensus that traffic signalization and assorted transportation improvements scattere9 throughout the Capital Improvement Plan are critical needs that should be addressed as early as possible. Signalization at the intersections of Hwy 77 and Windsor and N. Locust and Windsor were mentioned numerous times as critical projects needed before the Fall 1985 opening of Evers Park Elementary School. Signalization projects given priority status by tha former Traffic Engineer are attached. The Traffic Engineer also provided the Planning and Zoning Commission with a list of needed transportation improvements that ace shown on Table It. Sidewalk improvements to serve the area near Evers Park Elementary School are also included in the 1985-86 program year. A total package of $715,000 was recommended for transpor- tation and traffic improvements. Channel improvements to Pecan Creek near the Phoenix Apartments and near Woodrow Wilson Elementary School (total of $135,000) is also recommended for the 85-86 program year. A total of $900,000 for US 380 right-of-way acquisition and matching funds for US 360 is recommended for a shift to the 1989-90 program year largely because the highway department to not scheduling any immediate work. Projects beginning with the 1986-87 program will require a capital improvement plan bond election. C%ty Council Agenda June le, 1985 Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED: Receive the Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mendation for the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. ALTERNATIVES: Receive the recommended Capital Improvement Plan RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends the attached Capital Improvement Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Utility Capital improve- ment Plan. EXHIBITS: 1. Capital Improvement Plan Funding Schedule 2. Suggested projects and correspondence 3. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning commission meetings of April 17, May 1, and May 22, 1985. o wi L~K~v;v), David Ellison Senior Planner . I I 05389 n RECOMMENDED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDING SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY OF DENTON 1985-1986 Traffic Signalization $ 415.000 Traffic Signal Hardware $ 80.000 Intersection Turn Lanes $ 230,000 Fire Substation $ 450,000 Channel Improvements (Pecan Creek) $ 1100000 Channel (Woodrow Wilson Elementary School) $ 25,000 Sidewalks to Serve Evers Pack Elementary School $ 40,000 Total ;1,350,000 1986-1987 Loma Del Ray Drainage $ 825,000 Bridge on Woodrow Lane $ 250,000 Reconstruct Oriole Street $ 117,000 E. McKinney Street Culvert $ 25,000 Sidewalk on Hercules 1 15,000 Total ;1,232,000 1987-88 Improve Woodrow Lane $ 525,000 Stuart Road - Selene Drainage $ 320,000 Willowsprings Drainage $ 337,000 Traffic signals 25,000 Total $1,207,000 Capital Improvement Funding Schedule Page Two 1988-89 oversize Paving $ 1f,0,000 Stuart/Sunnydale Drainage $ 350,000 Taylor Park Drainage i 300,000 Pave Davis Street $ 15,000 Burning Tree Bridge $ 150,000 Burning Tree Drainage $ 64,000 Avenue 8 (Eagle to service road) $ 40,000 Total =1,069,000 1989-90 j US 380 Right-of-way Acquisition $ 200,000 I Matching Funds for US 380 $ 700,000 Drainage Improvements in Hollyh311 Area of Southridge $ 300,000 Audra Lane Drainage $ 90,000 j Total $1,310,000 I I 0469a ai IJ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDING SCHEDULE 1984-1985 Prairie Street Drainage $ 166,000 Yellowstone - Sheraton Drainage $ 724 000 Update Signal Equipment $ 100000 Total $ 900 ,oao 1985-1986 U.S. 380 R.O.W. Acquisition $ 2000000 Matching Funds for U.S. 380 $ 7000000 . Fire Substation $ 4500000 Total $1,350,000 The projects listed below will require CIP Bond Election: 1986-1987 Loma Del Ray Drainage $ 8250000 Bridge on Woodrow Lane $ 250,000 Reconstruct Oriole street $ 117,000 Traffic Signals $ 25,000 Sidewalk on HGrcules $ 158000 Total $ls232,000 F al Improvement Funding Schedule Page Two 1987-88 Improve 000drow Lane $ 525,000 Stuart Road - Selene Drainage $ 3200000 Willowsprings Drainage $ 337,000 Traffic Signals 25s000 Total $1,207,000 1988-89 Oversize Paving $ 1500000 Stuart/Sunnydale Drainage $ 350,000 ' Taylor Park Drainage $ 3000000 General Traffic Signal improvements $ 500000 Windsor/Sherman Drive Signal $ 500000 Pave Davis Street $ 150000 Burning Tree Bridge $ 150,000 Burning Tree Drainage $ 64,000 Avenue E (Eagle to service road) $ 40,000 Total $1,169,000 0469a SUGGESTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS April 1985 1. Drainage on Kingfisher Street $ 75,000 2. Old North Road-Nottinghan Drainage repave - 85 Bond $ 3521000 3. Archer Trail-Emerson Drainage overlay - 85 Bond $ 21.700 4. Duncan Street/Shady Oaks Drainage $ 300,000 5. Drainage improvements near Coit Street $ 169,200 6. Improvements to the Cooper Creek Channel (Bond ;2.8/$4.4 Issue) million 7. Street and drainage work at entrance to Acme Brick $ L508000 Company 8. Audra Lane Drainage $ 90,000 9. McKinney Street (Culvert 800' west of Bellaire) 25.000 10. McKinney Street (Channel work 1200' downstream) $ 200.000 11. Drainage improvements in the Southridge area $ 770,000 Little Drainage on Hollyhill crosses Longridge overlay - 85 Bond 12. Improvement of paving of Johnson and Smith Streets $ 250,000 13. Preservation of the City's environment including development of greenbelts and cleaning of drain- $ 1,000,000 ageways (Per Mile) 14. Drainage improvements behind 3001, 3101 and $ 10000,000 3011 Santa Monica (creek behind houses floods accessory buildings during heavy rains - MONTECITO CHANNEL) 15. Myctle Street Drainage $ 1600000 16. Development of internal roadway system for Airport $ 500,000 17. Development of a comprehensi•/e system of bicycle $ 1,250,000 lanes and jogging traits. 18. Deepen channel - Savannah Trail at Fairfax 19. Development of a central social services center $ 250,000 page 2 of 3 pages 20. Development of branch libraries $ 375,000 21. Purchase of a bookmobile $ 2000000 22. Development of store-front libraries $ 508000 23. Development of lighted stage for theater productions at the Civic Center 24. Highland Park - 135 to 400' north of Willawwood Street and drainage = 400.000 25. Land acquisition for neighborhood park in ] northeast Denton ] 26. Park development in southeast Denton ] 27. Improvements to existing city parks ] $ 200.000 28. Continued development of North Lakes Park (Per Year) l 29. Neighborhood recreation center in northeast Denton ] 30. Drainage on Carroll Boulevard north of University ] Drive across from Denton Center Nursing Home 31. Concrete channel near Phoenix Apartments from ] bridge on Ruddell Street where concrete portion ] of channel presently exists. Clean a channel ] where already concreted. ] *32. Concrete channel near Woodrow Wilson Elementary ] 1 30.000 School ] 33. Sidewalks to serve Evers Park Elementary School ] (Windsor to Hinkle; N. Locust to Twin Lake Mobile ] (tome Park; Evers Parkway) ] 34. Additional fire substation by 1988-89 or 1989-90 ] 35. Relocation of Bell Avenue ] 32a000a000 to $3a000a000 36. Recommended Signalizatlon A. Carroll @ Mulberry $ 500000 B. Carroll @ Pearl 500000 C. Eagle @ Welch 45,000 D. Audra @ McKinney 45,000 E. Teasley @ Londonderry 45.000 F. Locust @ Windsor 450000 0. US Hwy 77 @ Windsor 45.000 H. Various signalization hardware improvements 180.000 Total $ 5050000 page 3 of 3 pages 37. Improvements to streets in area or Rebuild Repave North,Texas State University A. Avenue B from Cagle to 1-35 $ $ 40,000 (request higher priority) B. Maple from Avenue D to Welch 290,000 48.333 C. Avenue A from Prairie to Chestnut 45,000 7 *600 D. Highland from Avenue C to Welch 215,000 35,833 C. Mulberry from Avenue D to Avenue 8 135,000 22,500 F. Sycamore from Avenue D to Avenue C 100,000 16,700 0. Prairie from Avenue A to Welch 70,000 11,700 Totals $855.000 =182,566 38. Additional recommended traffic and transportation projects; a. Left turn lanes, signal phasing at Dallas Drive and Teasley Lane = 75,000 b. Add left turn lanes. resurfacing on Willow Springs Drive c. Modernize and improve progression of University Drive 20,000 d. Modernize and improve progression of Carroll Boulevard 20,OOO e. Add three right turn lades at Loop 280 and I-35 115.000 f. Add W/B right turn lane at University and Carroll Boulevard 200000 g. Add S/B right turn lane at Carroll Boulevard and Cagle Drive 20.000 Totals S 270,000 Request has been made for inclusion of channel near Woodrow Wilson in operating budget instead of CIP. 0807s ~s- I CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOs Planning and Zoning Commission FROM$ Koorosh Olyai, Traffic Engineer DATES April 8, 1985 SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT, CIP 1982-83 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION IMFROvEMENTS Capital Improvement Funds for subject year were to rebuild and signalize the intersection of Dallas/Eagle/Bell. Design and signalization of the project were to be performed by Transportation Engineering. Desigr. has been completed and due to lack of bidding and/or inadequato amount of money (total $100400), construction has not yet been completed for signalization to occur. We will proceed with this project as soon as construction is completed. Please let go know if additional information is needed on this matter. ~~~0 ,~7oe" Koorosh Olyai KO/sc tr CITY OF DENTON :XMORANDUM TOs Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Koorosh Olyai, Traffic Engineer DAM April S. 1985 SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT, CIP 1984-85 TRAirIc AND TRANSPORTATION IgpROVEMEKTS The funds allocated for "Update of lv.%ffic Signal Equipment" for subject year will be utilized for purchase of cabinets for controllers. Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) should be sufficient for three (3) cabinets, to retire and replace some of the cabinets which have been struck by lightning or, due to age, have been causing numerous failures. Delivery of these cabinets shout be completed before the 2nd of summer, 1985. Please let me know if additional information is needed on this natter. Koorosh Olyai )(0/sc tr i „t: , s, CITYOI DENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL SUILOING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 1 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 M E:M0&ANDUM DATE: April 9, i985 TO: David Ellisun, Senior Planner FROM: Jecry Clark, amity Engineer RE: Capital Improvements Program Tne status of the original capital improvements program is as follows: 1. Bell - Coronado Drainage: This project was completed in July 19b4. 'rotesl ayment was 3332,202.64. Tne project is functioning well with no water problems now in the neignborhood. 2. Paisley - Mulkey Drainage: This projnct was finaled in July 1984. Total payment was $152,244.80. In conjunction with development in tiie area, the major drainage problems tnat existed have been addressed. 3. Ponder Street Drainage: 'I'bis project was also completed in July 1984, Total payment was 411Y,334.4o. Tnis system ties inco the Pannandle Channal Improvements. Tits system is working as no flooding has been experienced in the area. 4. Dallas Drive/Eagle Intersection: The street portion has been bid three times for ttie intersection work. The first time no bid was received. Tits last two times bids were from $25,000 - $39,000 over the budget of $502000. It was decided that the Street r r page 2 of 2 pages Department will do all barricading and excavation with the concrete work subcontracted out according to the annual city concrete work contract. Work should start middle to late summer. 5. Panhandle Street Drainage Project: The project started in August 6, 1984 after the utilities contractor had installed enougo l f the lines in the channel to get out of the way. Work on the project is about 60% complete. Estimated completion date is late June. The channel is complete almost to Bryan. 6. Stanleys Thomas Drainage: Desi of the project is complete. It will be out for bias by gnril 15. Bids should be received around May 5. Construction should be underway about June 1. 7. U.S. 380 Right-of-Way Acquisition: Pro ect has been set back by the Highway Department to the 198 - 1993 time frame for construction. 8. Yellowstone/Sheraton Drainage: Project is being designed now. Design should be complete in late June. Advertise for bids June 15. Construction should begin in early July. 9. Prairie Street Drainage: Survey work has been started. Design will start in June with completion about September is 1985. Project construction should start around October 1, 1985. Signal improvements and handicapped modifications to the Square are being covered in a memo by Koorosh Olyai. Please advise if further information is needed. Jerry C rk P.B. Citfy n i r #02859 ] ~ 1 Y. CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOs Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Koorosh Olyai, Traffic Engineer DATE: April S. 1985 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL, cIp 1989-90 Traffic and Transportation Improvements Attached, please find two tables which lists recommended signalizations and projects to be included in 1989-90 CIP schedule. Table I lists intersections which meet the requirements for traffic signalizations, and general improvements to existing systems. Table II lists locations where suggested improvements is felt will enhance operations. Further information and for clarification can be provided at our meeting, if you so desire. / Koorosh Olyai YO/If TABLE I PECOMMENDED SIGNALIZATION LOCATION DESCRIPTION STATUS COST Carroll @ Mulberry Signalization Presently warranted $50,000 Carroll @ Pearl Signalization 500000 Eagle @ welch Signalization " 450000 Audra @ McKinney Signalization " 45,000 Teasley @ Londonderry Signalization 45,000 Locust @ Windsor Signalization 45,000 U.S 77 @ Windsor Signalization 45,000 Various Signals Improvements to 180,000 Hardware TOTAL $505,000 ','ABLE II RECOMMENIS'D PROJECTS LOCATION DESCRIPTION COST Dallas @ Teasley Left turn lanes, signal phasing $750000 Willow Springs Add left turn lanes, resurfacing University Dr. Modernise and Impr4.ve progression 20,000 Carroll Blvd. Modernise and Improv,, progression 20,000 Loop 288 @ 135 Add three right turn Imes 115,000 University @ Carroll Add W/B right turn lane 20,000 Carroll @ Eagle Add SIB right turn lane 20r000 TOTAL $270,000 CITYo/ D NTON, TEXAS MUNIC!PAL BUJLDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 10, 1985 T0: Bill Claiborne, Chairman of Planning P, Zoning Commission FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer RE: Cost Estimates (Streets) Submitted by NTSU and TWU The rebuild prices on the left are based on streets being rebuilt. The repave prices are on the right. Repaving could involve an overlay, repaving, or possibly recycling. NTSU: RhBUILD REPAVE 1. Avenue E - already or CIP 1. Maple Street - Avenue D to Welch 41' x 2600' long ■ $290,000 $489333 3. Prairie Street - Avenue A to Welch 41' x 600' long $709000 $111700 4. Avenue A - Prairie to Chestnut 41' x 400' long $45,000 $70500 S. Highland - Avenue C to Welch 41' x 1900' long $215,000 $35,833 6. Mulberry - Avenue B to C • 31' x 700' long and Mulberry - Avenue C to D 41' x 700' long ■ TOTAL COST $135,000 $220500 page 2 of 2 pages REBUILD REPAVE 7. Sycamore - Avenue D to Avenue C 50' x 700' long = $1049000 $160700 All the above streets have had storm sewers recently installed or don't need drainage facilities. TWU : 1. Rerouting Bell Avenue from Withers to Snerman Drive Street Costs - 45' undivided $500,000 4 lane divided $6500000 Drainage $100,000 +2S1 contingencies undivided 7509000 divided 1940,000 Condemnation of the houses for rightonf-way the are between Sherman and University could run ftm tie to t. million dollars. Total project range $1,000,000 to $3,000,[)0. cs project would seem to be ea bond issue type expendi,ure. VAAO Jerry Clark, P,E. City Engineer is 10285E I ClrYof DENTON, rEJ€AS !MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TEI.EPHOr4E (817) 566.6200 Central Fire Station 217 14. McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Harch 21, 1985 Mr, Bill Claiborne, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission 215 E. McKinnal Denton, 76201 Dear Mr. Claiborne: me Fire Department currently has a Fire Sub Station in the !tve-year capital improvement program for fiscal year 1985-86. The City recently signed a contract with Public Technology, Inc. for a new management system that wtll help us by pin- pointing the impact of alLarnative levels of spending for equiprent, personnel, and fire stations. The system, "Fire ?faster," can help ensure :hat available resources are being used for tnaximum effectiveness. It helps local officials make the best decisions regazding key cost factors and their impacts on important service delivery measures such a9 response time and the full comp?ewent of resources necessary to respond to different fire hazar-'s. When usrad as a nlanning and fore- casting tool, Fire Master can assist in the development of agreed-upon minimum standards, for fire Drotection, and atrate- vs f)r achieving or maintnining those standards at the owes possible cost. Whet this ppro •am is completed it will show us where the next (C..J J. 1995-46) fire sub station site should be located. Also i° wil' show if our ctirrenr sub stations are in the right locations, or if they are not in the right locations and should be re-located. In revieO ng the +,ity of Denton City Council Strategic flan dated February 1, 1985 (preliminary draft), the aopulaticun projections estimate 67,000 people by 1988-6?. if this pro- jection holds tr,je, it is my opinion we will need an additional fire sub-station by 1988-89 or 1.989-90. l RECE'VEO MAU J ~ d. .,.p •i,:: n is , r 2 The nice thing about the Fire Master plan is that as we con- tinue to add data to the computer program it will provide fire station site locations for many years in the future. We will be happy to furnish the Planning and Zoning Commission with the results of Fire Master for future use as the results are completed. Respectfully, ack Gentry Fire Chief JG/tat t C1TYo/DENTRN,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 7620i TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 M E el U R A V U U M TO: Rick Svehla, Assisrant City Manager FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer DATE: October 19, 1944 RE: Concrete Channel - Woodrow School The existing earth lined channel. on the east side of Woodrow School has several existing problems. These are covered in Doug Keys enclosed letter$ I have preliminarily sized a channel for, tnis location. Exact details of the channel design can be ptovided if needed. The channel would have 3.3 square yards of concrete per foot of channel. Cost estimate = $L5/SY concrete = 3.3 SY/FT L80' ET long channel Cost = $25 x $3.3 x $ZdU Cost m 123,luU Therekore, I have estimated a range of $25-$3U thousand dollars. They wish this item to be considered for the n eratin budget as they don't feel the situation can wait until 1989s at the earliest, for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Please consider this issue and advise me of the direction you wish to take on the channel at your earliest convience. Jer y Clar{~ Cit ng er cc: Uou V'!y, principal Woo~roar Wilson School is l►OL63tr 't "e.q' C r r, WOODROW WILSON 6L11M9NTAnY SCHOOL ooua xtr. N1i»Ci►'%L 1101 MASON TANS - ►IIONS 392.2SIS DENTON. TEXAS 76204 10-16-A4 Mr. Jerry Clark City Engineer City of Denton Denton, TX 76201 Dear !sir. Clark, On behalf of Woodrow Wilson Elementary School and PTA, I would like to request your assistance as to the feasibility of con- structing a cement drainage ditch on the east side of the building. Presently the weeds need mowing, as it usually does throughout the year. Along with the tall weeds comes the drainage problem. There are many ?Toles in the ditch that allow water to stand and become stagnant. The water comes from the runoff of people watering their yards. Stagnant water, as you know, does create a health problem for the many students around the school and in the neighborhood. The students play as close as ten feet from the standing water during school hours. A fence does separate the playground from the ditch. We can monitor students during school hours, but it is very hard to monitor students aftir school is dismissed. I would appreciate it is this problem could be given priority as to its incorporation and completion. Sincerely, Doug Key, Principal ocr 1 a 1984 ti i l ..,?S r.w~ t 1 2408 Emerson Denton, Tx. 76201 November 6, 1994 Mr. Jerry CiJDk~- City Engineer' City of Denton Denton, Tx. 76201 Dear Mr. Clark, We are writing this letter on behalf of all the concerned parents of children attending Woodrow Wilson Elementary School. We would like to raquest that there be a cement drainage culvert built on the east end of the Woodrow Wilson school ground. Currently this drainage ditch is open and we feel that it is a health and safety hazard to the children. As the health and safety of our children is of upmost ink,oortance to us, we would like to see some immediate action taken on this matter. Thank you for your time. Sincerely yours, Woodrow Wilson PTA ooard CC'Ce.t-aC. f ~ V .f3~liY~y l~c'l c,,.1c.a.+ tov y t Denton Independent School District OIhN 01 Told A1511M4T I011,iNTI40I4T TOR IYIiN161 A/R4RS r O BOX IS47 DENTON. TEXAS 76202 April 16, 1955 Members, P1Snning and Zoning Commission c/o City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, Tx. 76201, reotIemenI Attached are ct_oi.s tD4 letters from the Denton Public Schools concerning pr4uioi,,s requests made to the planning and zoning comoinisit ion to ircIude certain or ojects in the C1ty of 0,?ntc•r Coital Irt+Drovement3 Program, Evers Park EI#mentar• School wit' t.~ oDeflirig r• Saptembe^, 15 S5, and ?t thi3 time, neither ~r34 fi•: c-ontrol de -i:ss r, the sideuia.lks requeE_ted have bef~n incorporates in tn, capital imorGVementa budget. The school dlitri,:t ?gain requests Your assiltance in providin,a the32 necessities for the opening of E„er? Pars. Thank you for your, ccons iderit1on. PIe?3e contact me if I c:.n be of fur`her. ?er,„:e. ;ncerelr, Gilbert Bernstein i Dr. Robert Mc[ee +I:: R Denton Independent -School District ROSCAT T Mt6tt too SY►to*74NO4%? ► 0 SOX 23s7 DENTON. TEXAS 74202 Merck% 1A. 1985 Mr. G. Chris Hartung, V.2y Manager City of Denton 215 E. McKinney St. Danton, Tx. 76201 Dear Chris: Thank you for allowing us to review the needs of Evers Park Elementary with you. As has been stated previously, a traffic control signal is needed at the corner of Highway 11 and Windsor and possibly at the corner of Windsor and Highway 2164, In addition, it is requested that you consider sidewalks on Evert Parkway, on Windsor (from Evers Parkway to Hinkle), and on Highway 2164 tr :he mobile home park. The reduction of speed on Highway 77 for a school tons would also be necessary. Attached is a copy of this request that was made March 6, 1984 to the Planning and 20^4.ng Comaission. Thank yru very much for your consideration. Sinceevee~ly, 7"r V&r" / M Robert T. McGee ct Gilbert Bernstein Rick Qvahla Bill Claiborne :lam, r .`f Denton Independent School District o,►KC of TA ,lC CTAY/ ,u,C,irTCwoCtT 001 SVIACIS WAI,$ P O •ox i1{1 DENTON. TEXAS 76202 March 6, 1484 Mr, Robert La.Fortt, Chi,irman Planning and Zoning CciTnlssion c/o Planning and Community Development Dept, 215 E. McKinney St, Denton, Tx. 76201 Dear Mr, L aForter Thank you for the opportunity for. allowing the Denton Independent School District to respond to the Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Denton. The school district will be opening its school on the Evers' Park sits In August, 1985, It is our recommendation that the city consider adding sidewalks on the street where tht school is located, on Windsor to Hinkle, and on Highway 2164 to the mobile home park, in addition, the city should study the need for. traffic yontrol signals at the corner of Windsor and Highway 77 and at the corner of Windsor and Highway 2164, This must be thorour;hly studied an.:J reviewed.arior to the opening of achool in August, 1585, 1t it also our opinion that theist needs should be reprioritizad and placed in tht 1984-65 capital Improvements budget t,5 that thtit imoroveraents will be ready when they art needed, Thank you for your consideration in this matter, Please contact me If i can be of further service, Sirtcertly, Hilbert Bernstein co Dr, Robert MCGet i c ~ 'fir r, .r < - s + f•: r Denton Independent School District WFICR of ?"I A01141174"? T01 ►Y11g1N UFAi11 0. BOx i7.7 DENTON. TEXAS 70202 May 13, 1983 Mr. Robert ! aForte, Chairman Planning a.id Zoning Commission Municipal Building Denton, Ty. 76201 Dear Mr. LaFortet Thank you very much for :affording the Denton Independent School District the opportunity to give input to the city's capital improvsrr.-ants plan, The school district will be opening a new elementary school in August, 1981, at the site adjacent to Evers' Park, Sidewalks may be necessary In the residential areas surrounding the school. Sidewalks were provided at Sam Houston Elementary School last summer. Thtse sidewalks were needed and were greatly appreciated. , Any help which you could offer in making sidewalks available for the new elementary school would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Gilbert Bernstein ci Dr. Robert To McGee;-Superintendent t/. I I T NORTH TEXAS 7F STATE UNIVERSITY Hand Delivered office of we VKe Ares4ent For Admmrstraace Man March 20, 1985 Mr. Bill Clairborne Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Planning and Community Develooment Department 215 East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mr. Clairborne: This is 'n response to your letter dated March 11, 1985, (%hich was received at NTSU on March 15) concerning recommendations to the City Council on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Request that all campus streets be repai•ed which are currently identified in the SID million street repair bond proposal election scheduled for March 2:9 1985, (cited streets narked in blue on the attached map). In addition, request street repairing requirements a• shown below be irrluded in the CIP: 1. Avenue E - Eagle to 1-35 (now listed for 1988-89; request move to higher priority) 2. Maple - Avenue D to Welch '3. Prairie - Avenue A to Welch rA Avenue A - Prairie to Chestnut 5. Highland - Avenue C to Welch ^-lo ~10• 6. Mulberry - Avenue 0 to Avenue B ' 7. Sycamore - Avenue 0 to Avenue C Sincerely, rederick R, Pole Vice President for Administrative Affairs mh Enclosure cc: Pete Lane Ray McFarlane P.C. 60X 13737 OENTOK TEXAS 76303.373? ! i kiss I III"tle.,.':NT~•. f ~ E . 1 I M.1 11• 1•.111 Sl _ _ I <1 NI ' N 11 W \1111 t' { t. I gilt it Inl it i = ri f, Vi W NYr ~i wh1,1s/1 yM f-.- I . .N Nl l . .wlr rJ+w1 \lrur 4 A VNHsk ° 1 Q Y ~~1Li~ii ` 1 i )ruwr .0N.w ',,,.`/111■]r 1~~.,,~...~A11111.INw Y~1 is. ~ ~~yy~ 1U1 1•IV. ~l n 1•' :1 { r N1 r...ifN /•MI ♦IwM 1 A .\.Nn IMII• ❑ O~ ItaW PM/f b;Ir1 disk". I~ \r 4 N M. me , rYh' 111 ••ff•!fJ A'NV.,c- Clrrw r,. "diN ~1 M 1. _ ww. • s f..//~////i ..rs-L~J-" _ ~ ~ h"nl a r..•.16 W• wWP11• h ills, "u 1 n•n1 I \p1.\1 IMw .1,94 Is. "kilid Nr w•f lnlr L1 1 r"1~ ` OWN 11-11614401 02 1N1 w. IV .eIY ♦•r N~\ m O ti O .ylH M"M YII.1• niu• r.Yi pll..1 hNM WM ~,1.11~~ •.=~Z 11,1'.x- e ' .IN Ni 1•Nn rA1N "did i. y p d ,':;r Er.Y~' "'rs" ".1,.. ..".II• overU W4 Or 0 Willis, M. P•40 4p Frey disks' p , n•.., .Inl auAf"" e O I II 11 ••••J f'MI• . tl Np l f r.".u 4 _ . _rr.rr di wr J- .5: _ ~-._J -fNJ NCH { 4 1 r~r~•t±rrdo4 n.«. • v 1 ti 1 , 'nisi.I I dill -3 r J ! 1►1 C ~'i /t9f ~ bo,~ ;ss~Ae~ r`. d s Aa+u .m MON11( Atl I~ LI"'A~~ .k 1 J \ \ 1 \ \1 1 1 1.11 N. N •n Iw l u.r N i ' i t Texas Woman's University r.o. so% saoss. centw Tsus 76204 ('Ili 36J-1466 OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT March 151 1985 Mr. Bill Claiborne Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Denton Municipal Building Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr. C1aiLornes Thank you for Your lettet of March 11 extending an invitation to participate in the recommendations leading to the five year capital improvement plan. In behalf of the Texas i;wan's university, I submit the project for relocation of Bell Avenue to the east of its present location as spezifiet' in the campus development plen which is on file with your cc mittee. I believe that existing data on this proposal are in your file and so I will wt duplicate here. However, if you do need other information or if those files do not contain data you need, please feel free to contact me. Best; wishes. Sincerely yours, AAjA Mary Evel . B1 uey President mmmaj RECEIVED 0 5465 a _ 1 ~ TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS Project t e an um er WINDSORISHERMAN DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1985--86 CXP %$sbl A06 aspens a epar men an v s on ENGINEERING 6 TRA}'FIC PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project is for a traffic signal at Sherman Drive and Windsor which is needed -iL" ; ~:'y t ~~~F~~*~~•, because this intersection is on a school ~1 ~ i Vim. , route, IF, pt "~'L ; IMP t, j Cl E! bolt UM 411* i f /IC' ILI Li •r n , I~ ~'i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'"-elf -JI 4 lyt.. JL a. to all b 0271s r r Elf r a TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENS Traffic Si nali:ation 198S-86 3415,00: helow" E owls" CIPWREW - Divis'on PROTECT NARIOATIVE LOCATION MAP The following signals are scheduled for , ri L installation when wa:f•ants are met. * Cost ■ $37SO000, - s 1 1, Carroll at Mulberry 2. Carroll at Pearl -1. t 3, Bogle at Welch ..,..r.:. f; 4. Audra at McKinney s 1 S. Teasley at Londonderry 6. Locust at Windsor 7. U,S. 77 at Windsor 'LrA 8, Windsor at Sherman " Progression on these roads will be improved, Cost s $409000 J s 1, Carroll Boule•s►ard } 2. University Drive 11 r l 1 . TRAFFIC IMMOVEMENS 1'110~t~T mLK AND NuNW. Traffic Si anal Hardware 19A5-AR rip sao ne MINUMME fl N IIO~OIII~INION - - - inAkArigler niviQinn PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP These projects will involve hardware updates to change from fixed time to ! actuated signals at many intersections throughout tho city, Specific project sites will be at the square, Locust, Elm, Hickory, Oak, Sell, etc. 1 Cost $80.00 too I .t. Y a "ANNA TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENS Intersection Turn Lanes 198S-36 CIP $2300000 Public Works - Engineering Division PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Turn lai.• s at the following intersections r~ were determined by the most recent traffic ;•..n L study to be needed to help traffic flows. - Dallas at Teasley - left turn lanes 2. Willow Springs - left turn lanes 3. Loop 288 at I3S - 3 right turn lanes 4. University at Carroll-west bound ♦~,r ore ight turn lane r S. Carroll at Eagle - South bound right hand lane s _ . 'CAR 17 f L ♦ • ♦ E' ' PUBLIC BUILDINGS l00J[Ct SIM ANY NUYO[N Fire Substation A[U'011SIB1[ D[/ARIMCUT AIlOOIYIfION ,Engineering and Development: PROJECT NAgRATIVE_ LOCATION MAP A standard two-bay fire substation will be con- l structed on a site to be selected to ensure I J orderly provision of fire protection and to meet State standards. ( r A fire substation is necessary to improve the City's ability to ade uately respond to fire and ambulance service needs. ! yr~r . r 'full r DRAINAGE. IMPROVEMENTS ~cr mac as R Chhannel Improvements - Pecan Creek 1985-86 CIP $1100000 mt Public k - En ineerin Division PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP The project will consist of concrete lining ;i the Pecan Creek channel starting at Ruddoll---1LJ l~JL~U~❑~ back through the Phoenix Apartments. I©~ LLJJ LJ Cost $110,000 r- c~a DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 1`14"CT WLE AND WJMlt Channel - Woodrow Wilson Elementary School 198S-86 CIP $25,000 1K E *tPM?KkT AM DIVI n n erin Division PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project consists of installing a xtlr+r..L_ concrete lining in the channel between ii .•..,.~+.w ;7(- f I Everson and Hanover. This is the only J~~tr rr~ LAl~ ~~C +~1 section on this creek not concreted, it s - ~1 ~I 41 - holds water and restricts flows wring •.I large storms. IC I.✓~ r`4 r J r ' , H l xwll 6i~ll' , 1 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Evers Schoo l Sidewalks 1985-86 P $40, 00 WIN 0 V%J'mmg=%Nl MW PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP The project will provide sidewalks from zft 11~ Locust Street along Windsor across City Park lands. Since developers wouldn't ,t ~j------ install sidewalks here, the City will have ( I ' to Und them. f , I . ' Cost $400000 L '""'01 to I~~ J~ U .,1~L1 J Lf LJ LJ ti L, f LJ L. L%w ) 1; IJEI! ' N P DRAINAGE IMPROVEKNTS 010J[CT 1111[ AND Ny4IC11 Loma Del Ray Drainage its ✓e~t;alo+~ 11tl1'4Nflllt OI~AAf11tNT ANODIVIfION ~""'r" Engineering and Development -PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project will help allevidto drainage prob= lems around the Loma Del Ray and Singing Oaks'. Apartments, Oriole Street, Kingfisher Street and - Cardinal Street, Water fequently tops the curb in this area and occassionally homes on Kingfisher Street, t iE 9 • STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IIILC AIIO NVYS[R Bridge on Woodrow Lane i'eIC -sue Owt; Rtsl'ONVIN CENAlYtIIT ANDDIVIsION Engineering; and Development _pOJ~CTHA,IMATlVE LOCATION MAP The existing bridge over Pecan Creek *on Woodrow Lane is a low water crossing and is frequently- ~ underwater during heavy rains. This project is for reconstruction.of the bridge to solve this E!JoDori problem. L JU~ lrl~s,J a~ r 64 FrW w[,. J 1 1 ~SIREFr IMPROVEMENTS PA0J(C1 lift( AND "UUN[n ;Reconstruct Oriole Street IIElPONIIIIE OEFAMEnT ANDOIVillON Engineering and Development -P[.giEC'f NAR-flATIVE LOCATION MAP j ,I Oriole street is one of the worst streets in the City. This project is for reconstruction of the street, • ~-"fir` wit *00~ TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS s PSIUM1 111LI AND HUMOUR Traffic Signal Improvements ifew 07 IAACOA00 RIOPONHILE HPAOIY[NI AN00IYIl101; Engineering and Development. PA ECT NARRATIVE, LOCATION MAP phis project is for acquisition and updating of ! traffic signal equipment city-wide. I ?l\ M 6 - M e • F r r r. • } w r . • l el. r. rar rrr ~4. 04 7• , ~.r..r..r 7 trrr \\l , i . ~L STREET IMPROVEMENTS FNOACT IIKE ANO NVYOEN Sidewalk on Hercules AEETON>flUt DEPARTMENT ANIMMION .,Engineering and Development PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP The sidewalk will be on Hercules %.here no side- walk exists to provide a safe school route For' ' children going to Woodrow Wilson Elementary School. r ~ Y raicct 111te AND IrUaocll STREET IMPROVEMENTS Improvement of Woodrow Lane MV _ 88 'CX P - S~S, ooe ALI►O"111LI HPARIU111T ANOOIVISION .Development and Engineering PROJ ECG' NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project is for reconctruction of Woodrow Lane which will soon be connected to Colorado Ireee7 Boulevard to provide an additional access to the Mall. RDIQ r Not 11. MEMO 1 ~ DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Project Title an Number STUART ROAD - SELENE DRAINAGE M-7 -'SS CT-P 6#3201000 Responsible epaitment an Division ENGINEERING PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project will relieve flooding at Stuart Road and Selene Street which prevents vehicular traffic during avy rains and cuts off access to Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park. ~Jt\+ H iT l •L J;0ai vev, s` I'tJ L 04~~" L t: E-Lmr ri sad / lei OF~ \ i1 .plow to K tell do n ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~~U Lam: r--~(.~ ~~I ~i 1! !~A~.,. ~1 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PNOJ[CI IIIII AND NUYV[N Willow •„snrings DrginaAe Igg7-$f; CTP 3371000 MCIP0111111t O[PANIY[NI ANONIVISM ,Engineering and Development NnOJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project will help drainage in the Willow II gI g / I Springs-Duncan Street area. Water has gotten ~I.JUU~ L~,J 1JL into at least one business in this area. The l „ additional coro:truction on Dallas Drive will ' aggravate drainage problems in this area until this project is completed, a~ UI IdL ®at~ ~ s w 01 I ~ 1 MORA Of TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 11119 AND NVYilll I Traffic Signal Improvements ~qg'j.. $ g GIP 000 p[1~~~NTINI[ OLPAA14[NT AND OMSION En ineerin and Development PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project is for acquisition and updating of ~ I traffic signal equipment city-wide. I r' . e ' ` IYT I i J.~tI • rI r r ~ .•r STREET IMPROVEMENTS Project Title and Number OVERSIZE PAVING /Pow. 00 vf/avae° Responsible Department and Division ENGINEERING PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION HAP This project is for funding of oversize street paving for collector or larger streets in newly I 't developing areas. I I I MOM I to DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Project Title and Number STUART/SUNNYDALE DRAINAGE /P*V-ss Ve-AM~ Responsible Department and Division ENGINEERING _ PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project will work in conjunction with previous CIP drainage projects in this area to f,Ir I;/ , alleviate flooding. • J I J : ~II tl I/r I I gall % ul W ,o ;FIT ~ tiv11, L ) NI .a trlr+.~,. 1 Cute, I' ~JI C3 .I.,r 11~ . ~uF•l..h I MIN goo i jfff'`~~~~~.'rrr.~gq~~~, fff~rr of, tIIIM / r A f it H ~.1"~ 04 f ~ O ~yyy l ~ DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ro ect t e and Number TAYLOR PARK DRAINAGE ~9gI •B! ,/.sag 000 Responsible Department and Division ENGINEERING PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP r This project is a asjjor improvement to the drainage system in tfze Taylor Park area. 1.6st rF7 gar:/h. ' ~ Ssr 1 ~ v ~ t .lr • •I I' 1 r L is 40. t Je 1 ~ . .nfatY.rJ.uJMMI-•:•Y.wr,.....u...r...r.~....wW rr r..rMVI.r_r►~Mrr..rr....wV Mtwwwwr.wH.r..M+.,u+r...R..U..A YY~A~rMi. .14q 0w.rr,►I.M.wl"O.41.W...%YW 0 MOW OW Woof. Hwi 4 V•ll I A' 1•,. . TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS I'lll1JLC1 Ilfi[ Alkl lluuY[11 'i'raCCic Signal. Itill) rove well ts i9AOR •0! ,ie-4r. o ' JI(SPWlllBlt t1L1A1I111U11 Al10D1Y1lIUII •I"'Iloinceriu•; and I)eve).opIllent _L)fl JE0' NAIMATIVI:_ LOCATION MAP This projeCt is 1`01 1tel1ulvi.Ciou and updating oL ` Cr:If:Fic signal. erluipment city-wide. l X51: 1; jl I9~141t~~,..•./'I,'~ I tip .11 „ ` if ~j y - lit ~ I f^I';`',~I~'- 'a ji[. 64 q I JLl.l.l. r ! fly' / yr~.~ ~ ~ . st STREET IMPROVEMENTS Project M and-Number DAVIS STREET PAVING espons S epartmer an v s on ENGINEERING PROJECT NARRATIVE y~~ LOCATION MAP This project is for paving of Davis Street♦ I~L_JIrliGitlJ' F I'• 'all I 1 ti ..71 L.J ~iTTTf -7`-7 - 1 f~l~L ~J f fI 11•L ~ Ll. left P: 'z,~❑ 1 r ,.r.rlVJ l._._.__ I i , i - 4.1 L % i 01i MID C7 A97 t ~r AMT, rt ' &J STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Pro ect Title an Number BURNING TREE BkIDGE ~f~d"B9 000 Respons-M-elreWrtnent and- Division ENGINEERING PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project is to make improvements to the bridge on Burning Tree Lane to make it pass- able during heavy rains and to help alleviate \ •s;~~~•~~_ restriction of the water flow caused by the -5-- fill bridge. - / L-____r f-Z" 3, [L 41 fi `121L~JW ..~>tT(', ,ftI e[u~t.,. .ta.b V 4Llx[i.[=-~! air- ~A s ISO #01 to 21 J , I NI• f Iv~ ~ ~-1 . ~ .dad C MENNEN a* DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Project Title an u■ er BURNING TREE DRAINAGE /-W -.f.0 Are~ espons a Department-and Division ENGINEERING PROJNCT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This ?roject is in con'unction with Burning 11. Tree bridge Improvemenis to improve the ~ ,a drainage system in this area. r., NK) t lie, LAI, I n- I f 1 r L~.l i !!.•0. 4' 1 ~,.tw .ELI =t: cd It 14 1 PON Lit A9•it~ STREET IMPROVEMENTS Project Title and Number AVENUE E iAfB -e0 41,0p 4700 Responsible epar ■eat an Division ENGINEERING PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This ~ . • ~ - - ~ . ~ • project is for street Improvements to ~ t Avenue E between Eagle Drive and the service --C]; road. 11, - _ _4E yi ` 1 Y,N< • ~ 1 I j Li LD F---7 I j 1 =t Luum-au-j LPN 1 f 16 ~rJerwr,wwra.lr. STREET IMPROVEMENTS PDOUCI 11IL9 Ally NV41E6 U.S. 380 R.O.W. Acquisition 1489 Qp CZP 0450 .DES!'ONSIDIt OEPMUM AND DIVISION Engineering bnd Development PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP The Texas State Highway Department plans to reconstruct U.S. 360 (University Drive) from 1 Locust Street eastward to the City limits. The ! j resulting thoroughfare will have excellent access 1 between central and east Denton. The City's required contribution includes participation with the State for right-of-way purchases. ` ►7n• i M . ` • oil I 1 r, I, ON, ~~n.......,.. Pow 1WWASPUNINSOWS" STREET 111PIRWOVE IC S VR0MI 111►[ AN011DYAER Matchin funds for Highway 380 1989-9© CTP '~oiOl a°e7 1111l0N11R►[ 0CI•ARINIV ANi01VISION Engineering and Development PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP The Texas Highway Department plool to reconstruct U.S. 380 (University Drive) from Locust Street' to the City limits. The resulting thoroughfare will have excellent access betwoot central and l a•. east Denton. The City's required contribution ~ r includes participation with the State in utility Jlf - r, relocations and construction of drainage systems. I c j - n I ~i:L VI tj~ 0611 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 1 POWCT TITLE AM NIMEII Drainage I• rovements - Southridge Area 1988-89 CIP $3009000 11ES~O ME OE RI Public Works - n in erin Division PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project will consist of running a storm sewer system down Longridge Drive from Teasley to Hollyhill. -il«f t \v I town ~ 4l This amount of money will only provide the ef trunk line needed. ~I r•J"` cost $3001000 ► I "wool LA d I J r DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS "01 owl "tv 18MR11 Audra Lane Dre roe 1988-89 CIP $909000 Public MoRms - 8ngineering Division PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP The project will extend the trunk storm I any ]L-3L-.UL sewer sy systata up Audra Lane past Paisley. This will allow the water . the area to drain more easily to the system installed , #F in 1984 without causing flooding orr 1 standing in the ditches after it rains. ; -7 r u y~] /OKI f; Cost $909000 Q W, N Minutes Planning and Lonirg Commission April 17, 1985 A special called meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday April 17 1965, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Mun;cipa! tluitding. Present: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, F. B. Escue, Jr., Robert LaPorte, Tom Pearson and Andy Sidor Absent: Gary Juren Present from Staff: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development; John McGrene, Director of Finance; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Koorosh Olyai, Transportation Engineer; Harlan Jefferson, Admini- strative Assistant, and Audrey Bachman, secretary Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order and explained that purpose of the meeting is to receive input from various entities of cr,a city so that the Planning and Zoning Commission can develop a recommendation to the City Council on the Capital Improvement Plan to be designated for the 1989-90 fiscal year. Mr. Meyer explained that projects included in the capital improve- ment plan still require funding down the line, by the general budget or possibly by a bond issue. He said that even if a pro- iect is included in the CIP, there is no guarantee that it will e dealt with; that it is a design plan that the city follows as much as possible but the actual cost of a project can affect the year of the project. Mr. Claiborne opened the public hearing. Clarence Ed Smith, 1300 Lindse3, stated that a drainage problem exists on Carro . Boulevard, north of 380, across the street from the Denton Center Vursing Home. He said there is storm sever and curb and gutter to contro?, the water but the back aide of two recently constructed approaches is lower than the street causing water from the street tr, go down those driveways and across the yards. He said he feels this affects the beautification of the city and if this type of thing is not corrected the city will not look good in a few years. He said these twi drives do not ccnform to the rest of the street; that water can be controlled in most floods by elevating the approach. On question, he said he did not know whether water goes into the houses. Mr. Clark said he would investigate and report his findings to the Commission and also to Mr. Smith. Joe Gordon, Director of the Denton Housing Authority, asked that the drainage ditch that goes through Phoenix Apartments be con- creted from the bridge on Huddeli to where the concrete stops at the present time. He said the ditch is 20 to 30 feet deep; when it rains, there is a problem with flooding. He also asked that concreted part be cleaned out stating that there are trees, old tires, old refrigerators, etc. in it now. On question, ne said that the ditch continues through a pasture. Mr. Clark said it is Pecan Creek, that the portion through Phoenix City Park and Phoenix Apartments is the concern. He said that he tied talked with Mr. Gordon earlier and told him to contact the street depart- ment about cleaning out the concreted portion. Hr. Gordon said Mr. Corbin of street department had indicated he would be out in a few days. Chairman declared public hearing closed and stated that Commission would set a study session to develop its recommendation to the City council. P 16 •L Minutes April 17, 1965 page 2 Mr. Never pointed out that comments made toniht are not the only projects that have been suggested. He said t9st written comments have also been received, that there are always more projects titan there is money. Mr. Sidor asked that all suggested projects be itemized with approximate cost of each and added to the list of suggested projects so that Commission could determine need and priority at its study session. Mr. LaForte asked if Commission could move items from one year to another and Hr. Meyer replied that Commission is authorized to do that. Mr. Sidor asked Mr. Olyai to prioritize suggested signals and bring to the study session. After discussion, a work session was scheduled for May 1, 1965, at 6:00 p.m., in tLe Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building. Cnairman said a recommendation to the City Council could then be made at the Commission's regular meeting of May 22. Meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. n. Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission • Work Session May 1, 1985 A work session of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton was held on May 1, 1985, at 6:00 p.m., in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building. Present: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr., Robert Laforte, Tom Pearson, and Andy Sidor Absent: Gary Juren Present from Staff: Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities; C. David Ha;., Assistant Director of Utilities, John McGrane, Director or Finance; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Koorosh 01yai, Transportation Engineer; Harry rersaud, Urban Planner; Steve Fanning, Senior Planner; David Ellison, Senior Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Denise Spivey, Urban Planner; and Charles Cryan, Utility Rate Administrator 1. Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order and explained that the purpose of the work session is to discuss cumulative zoning and to develop a recommendation for the City Council concerning the Five Year Capital Improvements Plan of the City of Denton for the 1989-90 program year. Chairman Claiborne requested that Commission approve allowing Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, and John McGrane, Director of Finance, to address utility portion of C.I.P. and financial aspects of C.I.P., respectively, prior to discussion of cumula- tive zoning because both have to attend Public Utilities Board meeting scheduled to begin at 7:00 p.m. The Commission agreed to request bj consensus vote. Mr. Nelson directed the Planning and Zoning Commission's attention to the executive summary of the proposed Utility Capital Improvement Plan and presented highlights of the recommended plan. Mr. Nelson continued by discussing com- parison between the 8S-89 C.I.P. and the proposed 86-90 C.I.P. in dollar amounts. Mr. Nelson specifically mentioned recommended items such as water plant upgrade, new water plant, replacement of old water and sewer lines, new water and sewer mains, oversizing costs, water taps, loops and meters. Mr. Sidor asked where projected new water plant would be located. 4r. Nelson replied somewhere in the north or northwest quadrant of the City. Mr. Pearson asked if developers and individuals were not responsible for items such as water and sewer taps and meters. Mr. Nelsor, stated that taps were paid for by individuals, but must be budgeted nonetheless. Discussion of C.i,P. proposal for utilities continued. Mr. Pearson stated iL't' utility linkages have tremendous impact on growth and development and urged that close attention be paid to market forces. Mr. Nelson concluded report and Utility Department members left for Public Utilities Board meeting. John McGrane, Director of Finance, was introduced to the Commission and asked to present sny information he felt was valuable in helping develop recommendations. P A Z Minutes may 1, 1985 Page 2 Mr. McGrane stated that his main comment was to simply inforo Commission that bond funds are limited at this time, and at some point, future bond sales would necessitate a tax increase largely due to the impact of the successful street bond issue. Mr. McGrane added that debt service looks limited fo: the rex*. two to three year period and that approximately one million dollars was left in bond funds for this program year. Mr. Pearson asked if revenue projections have been done and how much revenue is realized from utility fund. fir. McGrane answared that revenue projections based on 9.7 percent growth has been done and that about three million dollars is involved in transfer to utility fund. Mr. LaPorte asked when bond elect'.on would be held and when is it needed. Mr. McGrane Informed Commission that City Council must :ecide. Chairman Claiborne expressed appreciation for Mr. Nelson's and Mr. McGrane's participation and directed the Comsission's attention to discussion of cumulative toning. Mr. Persaud outlined some of the major problems which rasiilted from cumulative toning which permitted all types of residential uses in the non-residential zones. He ea lained that certain types of commercial and light industrial and uses ofl:en times negatively impacted residential uses. The long term develop- ment of thhe City requires greater control over lands in t•te high, medium and low intensity areas in order to maintai!, a proper land use/transportation balance. Finally, he polvted out that the utility requitements for non-residential uses vary from residential uses and often times there are problems in locating residential uses in non-residential zones. Mr. Pearson said he is concerned about the increasing cost of housing and that greater restrictions will make it more diffi- cult for both the developer and the consumer. He explained that he wou:d xtsh to see these matters regulated by market demands. W. Fanning reported that staff •:ss responding to direct request of the City Council to amend the toning ordinance. Mr. Sidor and Mr. LaPorte spoke in favor of the ordinance and a motion was approved S-1. (Mr. Pearson voted no.) The Commission also voted S-1 (Mr. Pearson voted no) for the new ordinance to be effective on passing. it. Chairman Claiborne reopened discussion of C.I.P. for non-utility items. Mr. LaPorte stated that he felt that the puW c would under- stand making signalization and sidewalk improvements near Evers Park Elementary School a pr!orlty in the 1985-86 program year. M:. LaPorte further stated that signalitrtion inprove- merts in genersl is an important item in his opinion. Jerry Clark, City Engineer, Informed Commission that W fting sidewalks, signalitation, and transportation improvements per recommendation of Transpportation Engineer to 1985.86 program are r not uscheduledlto be k madel immediatelyprovements to Hwy .'b0 Mr. LaPorte made the motion to shift Hw 380 rifit-of-+,ay acquisition and matching funds for Hwy 3,10 to 1989.90 progffm year and substitute ail signalitatlon and transportation improvements scheduled prior to 1989.90. 4i: c rw r _ P 6 Z Minute may 1, 1985 Page 3 Mr Mai stated that he has reported intersections which meet criton of state fore Gibert Bernstein Assistant Superintendent for Denton Inde- pendent School District, Informed Commission that busing will be heavy in area of Evers Park Elementary School and sidewalks are needed badly along with signals at intersections of Hwy 77 and Windsor, and Windsor and North Locust. Mr. Bernstein added that ultimately the School District would like to see sidewalks down North Locust to area of Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park, but some flexibility is available on sidewalks because signalisa- tion is principal priority. Mr. Claiborne stated that majority of Commission members apppear to agree that signalisation should be shifted to 198S-86 program year. Mr. Clark informed Commission that if recommendation to shift signalisation Is approved staff will ao all it can to have signals near Evers Park in place by S.i;tember or opening of school year. Mr. Olyai Informed Commission tha, current staffing level will not accommodate all signalisation and transportation improve- ments in one year. Mr. Olyai further stated that the state must approve all signalisation before staff can proceed. Mr. LaForte repeated motion concerning shifting signals:ation and transportation improvements, sidewalks near Evers Park Elementary, channel improvements near Phoenix Apartments and Woodrow Wilson Elementary School to 1985-86 program year as substitute for Hwy 380 funding. Motion was seconded by Ms. Cole and approved unanimously. Mr. LaForte made motion to place $90,000 Audra Lane drainage project in 1988.85 program year in place of $100,0CO for general traffic improvements acid Windsor/Sherman Drive signal, and substitute $1S,000 Mclinney Street culvert for $25,000 traffic signal item in 1936-87 program year. Motion was seconded by Mr, Sidor and approved unanimously (6-0). 1989-90 C.I.P. recormendation was presented as follows: US Hwy 380 Right-of-Kay Acquisition $ 1000000 US Rwr 380 Matching Funds 7006000 Drainage Impprovements for Hollyhill Area of Southridge 400,000 $1,300,000 Motion to approve Utility Department recommended Capit+l Improvement Program was made by Mr. Claiborne and seconded by Ms. Cole. Motion carried unanimously (6.0). III. Meeting adjourned at approximately 9:4S p.m. 'y. 1 I l I ,ti!, nXt _ P 6 t Minutes May 22, 1985 Page 2 I. Make a recommendation concerning the City of Denton Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. (UNAPPROVED) Mr. Ellison explained that a public hearing to receive public input was held on April 17, 1985, a study session was held on May 1, 1985 to develop a recommendation for the five year funding schedule, and the purpose of this meeting is to for- malize a recommendation to the City Council. He said that all funds for improvements as recommended are not available at this time, funds will have to be provided at some future date possibly by a bond issue. Chairman asked for comments from citizens. None were offered. The recommended funding schedule was discussed and consensus was to substitute the McKinney Street culvert for traffic signals in 1986-87. Also, to delete general traffic signal improvements and Windsor/Sherman Drive signal from the 1988-89 funding year as those items have been moved to the 1985-86 funding year. It was also agreed to move Au6ra Lane Drainage to 1989-90 funding year, instead of 1988-89 year as suggested at the study session. Mr. Escue moved to recommend adoption of the five year capital improvement funding schedule as discussed at the study session with changes agreed to above. Seconded by Mr. Sider and unanimously carried (5-0). 1D CITY of AENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817} 566.8200 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Roland Laney, Chairman, Public Utilities Board DA125: April 26, 1985 -_-_Denton Municipal Utilities _Capital .ImprovementrPlan_--__- RE: Attached hereto please find the Utility Departmenv 1986-1990 Capital Improvements Plan. The Public Utilities Board uas approved this }plan for your review and submission to the City Council. I Ro. n ane C a rman Public Utilities Board c c : R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities c: c file Attachments 36i9U f EXECUTIVE 5WNARY The fiscal 1986.1440 Five Year Utility Systest Capital Improvement Plan outlines projected expenditures of $74,837,000 for capital improvements. This total includes $354067,000 for the electric service improvement:;, $32,973,000 for water service improvements and $8,647,000 for wastewater service improvements. (see Exhibit D). The Capital Improvement Plan includes the Lewisville and Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Projects ($6,668,000); improvements to the I Power Plant; Distribution System improvements to serve new customers (510,8039000); the electric line underground conversion on the Downtown Square; three new substations plus additions to existing substations; improvements to the existing Water Plant to bring its capacity from 24 MGD to 30 MGD ($3,617,000); additions to raw water and finished water pumping; major water transmission lines, and sewer collection lines; improvements to sewer lift stations; funds • for oversizing water and sewer lines ($5,000,000); rep)acing existing deteriorating water distribution and sewer collection lines; an equalization basin for the Sewer Plant; and additions to the Service Center., The source of funds for the Capital Improvement Plan projects are 4S1,411,000 from bond funds including $59,500,000 from proposed new bond sales, $19,111,000 from revenues, $3,371,000 from aid-in-construction, and $1,213,000 from other sources, primarily motor pool funds. (see Exhibit 11). Utilities currently has sufficient bonds to operate through the 1986 fiscal year. Bond sales are anticipated in two year increments, with the electric service requiring $12,000,000 of new bone: funds; the water service requiring $23,500,000 (including a new water plant and a 2S1 increase in capacity to the existing plant), and the wastewater service requiring $4,000,000 (see Exhibit 111). 3601U:1:85 77 l The Capital Improvement plan is based on present system escalated with moderate growth of approximately 51 per year for all • services through 1988 and 41 thereafter. Electric sales are estimated to increase from $30 million KWH in 1985 to 782 million KWH in 1990 with customers increasing from 24,711 to 51,357. Water sales are estimated to increase from 3.4 billion gallons 4.3 billion gallons in 1990 (see Exhibit IV). If a greater rate of growth is experienced, the capital improvements will have to be accelerated and the proposed $39,500,000 in revenue bonds would not be sufficient for the entire period of 1986 through 1990. The charges for electric service are estimated to increase from 8.7S4 per KWH in 1985 to 10.1SJ in 1990 with the majority of the cost (721) to be fuel and purchased power. Debt service resulting from existing and proposed bond sales is projected to remain fairly level at .444{ per KWH in 199S going to .5691 per KWH in 1990. Water service charges are estimated to increase from $2.22 per 1000 gallons in 1985 to $2.8S per 1000 gallons in 1990 with debt service • to increase from 28.044 per 1000 gallons in 1985 to 94.0{ per 1000 gallons in 1990. Sewer service charges are estimated to remain at the zurrent rate throughout the planning period. Debt service will increase from an average per residential customer in 1985 of about $2.87 to about $3.59/residential customer in 1990. (see Exhibit 1V). Bond issues have been scheduled so that debt service on a per unit of sale basis remains fairly constant for electric and wastewater customers. Due to the relatively larger investments required for water plant upgrading and water transmission uistribution system requirements, and an additional plant, the debt service per unit of water sales increases through the planning period. The pro forma for each utility service indicates that a sufficient coverage ratio exists to enable anticipated bond sales. It is inticipated that bonds will be 2S year with 21 principal payments the first five years and 4.51 thereafter. The interest is assumed 'o average 101. The debt-to-equity (Exhibit V) ratio for 36010;2 the utility system changes from 281 debt and 721 equity for 1484 to 451 debt to SS1 equity in 1490. This ratio moves toward the Public Utility Board's recommendation to a ratio of SS/45 to 60/40 debt-to-equity ratio guideline. (see Exhibit V). Outlines of the major projects for the planning period are provided in exhibits VI and VII. Respectfully R. E. Nelson, P.B. Director of Utilities EXHINT I ELECTRIC UTILITY A comparison between the 85-89 CIP and the proposed 86-90 CIP showing the primary projects is as followso Est. 1986-1990 1985-1989 1985 1. Lewisville Hydro 30810,000 3,810,000 20,000 2. Ray Roberts Hydro 20858,000 2,858,000 3. Downtown Underground 500,000 5000000 4. Street Light conversion 130,000 153,000 35,000 5. Extension And Improvements 10,803,000 5,671,000 1,832,000 6. SCADA Equipment 219,000 297,000 25,000 7. Substation Screening 2750000 95,000 8. Service Center Addi'ion 400,000 400,000 9. Remote Metering/Load Management 800,000 400,000 10. Switchgear Replacement 216,000 275,000 230,000 11. North Lakes Substation 5 ?0t000 590,000 12. Airport Substation 650,000 805,000 13. Audra Substation 8600000 865,000 14. Power Factor Improvement 4170000 380,000 810000 15. Economic Conductor Replacement 4250000 16. Other 3,932,000 3,515,000 218,000 17. Power Production Replacement 20658,000 2,348,000 25,000 18. Acquisition of Facilities Within City 1,000,000 19. Customer Incentive Program 11893,000 20. Ryan Substation Duplex 6500000 805,000 750,000 21. Spare Poster Transform4,r r_ 350,000 234,000 $33,076,000 $240117,000 $3,450,000 • $-Fear CIP Electric/31CIP 3-21-85 EXHIBIT II Water/Wastewater Utilities A comparison between the 1985-1989 CIP avd the proposed 1986-1990 CIP showing the primary division and projects is as followsi Project 1986-1990 1985-1989 Est.1985 1. Water Plant Ulxrade 306170000 3,560,000 8179000 2. New Water Plant 16,493,000 17,110,000 30C,000 3. Other Water Production 373,000 1,588,300 7910512 4. Replace waterline 212590000 665,500 431,';0? 5. New Water Mains 4,749,000 3,764,200 771,820 6. Water taps, loops, meters 2,2001000 1,100,000 336,000 7. Oversize Waterlines 20500,000 550,OC0 328,217 8. Replace Sewerlines 1,561,000 489,100 325,413 9. New Sewer Mains 2,104,000 1,927,000 503,100 10. Sewer Taps 250.000 1750000 35,000 11. Oversize Sewerlines 2,500,000 300,000 297,263 12. Rehabilitation of Plant 220,000 300 41,000 13. New Construction 1,356,000 1,375,800 341,500 14. Innovative & Alternative Tech 82,000 26,500 4,000 15. Lab & Expansion Improvements 135,000 10,400 4,000 16. Laboratory Equipment 63,000 26,500 4,000 17. Mobile Equipment 1,2680000 11002,700 194,000 18. Wash Rack 50,000 0 0 19. Covered Vehicle Shed 0 50,000 500000 TOTAL CIP'S 41,776,000 33,8319300 5,575,527 • 5-Year CIP W/WWtCIP April 10 EXHIBIT III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i TOTAL 1986-1990 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL REQUIREMENTS li,000-S) MATL•'R NASTEMTR. TOTAL ELECTRIC TOTAL 19856 (3,939 $1,641 $5,601 14,617 10,218 1986 41143 2,295 6,438 81821 15,259 1987 51102 10512 6,614 71051 13,665 1988 21906 21250 51156 61191 11,347 1969 91740 11350 111120 59952 17,072 1990 111083 1.."0 12,442 51052 17,494 TOTALS $32,973 $8,797 141,770 $33,067 $74,637 1 OF TOTAL 44.1% 11.8% 55.8% 44.2% 100.0% • • April 16 EXHIBIT IV EAECUTIVE SUMMARY TOTAL 1986-1990 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SOURCE OF FUNDS i1,C00'S1 BUNG CURRENT FUND REVENUE WATER WASTEWATER ELECTRIC TOTAL WATER WASTEWATER EL£C'iRIC TOTAL 1985+ 1,476 1,505 3,523 18,504 65 112 931 $1,108 1986 2,323 1,347 7,306 $10,976 1,367 845 11.368 13.530 1987 4,378 1,055 4052 $10,185 269 314 2,140 $2.783 1988 2,165 11840 31299 $7,304 288 266 21659 $3.213 1989 8,778 943 2,993 $12,714 2r'2 330 2,817 $3.439 1990 10,060 870 2,393 $13,323 317 377 2.402 $3.096 SUB-►:'AL $27,704 16,055 120,743 $544502 $2.533 12,194, $114386 116.111 94.9% 6818% 62.7% 72.6% 7.7% 24.9% 34.41 21.51 AID-1N CONST, 37HER MATER WASTEWATER ELECTRIC TOTAL WATEF VASTEWATEF ELECTRIC TC,?A? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1~d5+ 33h 35 100 $471 62 10 63 $135 1935 4(G 110 1560 5- 5: 37 114: 19e 50 122 $572 55 13 17 1121 1980 00 J: 120 1570 74 113 126: `y4 5C, 5G 94 1644 170 57.4 43 12-c I''?90 X00 115 $665 2L:5 67 141 f4 ib 14( $25t $561 $:,711 $5,6 1300 1377 11.21' - rlb-TOTAL 12 6.; 0 +1985 Not In,r ;ded 77-77~777; "777 ti r page 21 ExhlbIIt lV TOTALS WRIER WASTEWATER ELECTRIC TOTAL 1965+ 3,939 19662 41617 $10,216 1986 4,143 29295 E8,921 $:59259 1967 51102 11512 71051 113,665 198^ 21906 79250 61191 $11,347 1589 99740 11380 51952 117,011 1990 111082 11360 51052 $17,494 $32,911 -_$8,797 $33,067 $74,837 44,1% 11.8% 44.2: 100.0% • • 7 as 7 $ Apr i1 14 EXHIBIT V E%ECUIIVE SUMMARY • 1985-1989 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN BOND SALES AEOUIRED t1000,S1 ELECTRIC MATER WASTEWATER TOTAL 1985s 91500 71000 39500 20,000 1986 0 0 0 0 1987 1,G0'1 49000 29500 13,500 19BB 0 0 0 0 1989 5,500 1995)0 11500 26,500 1990 0 0 0 0 =%c=*2aaz2 ■st-e-aca --ztee~ze _ztfzzazz Total Ntw Bonds Required 12.500 2350t, 4.000 40,000 +1985 Not included r April 10 EXHIBIT VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1985-1989 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN • UTILITY COSTS L DEBT SERVICE PER UNIT OF SALES Electric Service Total Total AVG AvT Debts Fossib e, FY 1 Of Sales Mwh Rev Service Rate Ending Cust Revenues- Sales c/kWh -c/kwh Change-- --1985 24,711 155,224 630,748 8.76 0.444 1986 26,152 60,747 662,285 9.17 0.488 4.8% 1987 27,426 669518 695,400 9.57 0.417 4.3% 1988 28,683 71,838 7239216 9.93 0.560 1969 29,993 76,148 752,144 10.12 0.612 1.9x 1990 319351 799195 782,230 10.12 0.569 .0% Water Service Total Total AVG Avg Debts Possible FY # OF Sales Sales Rev--- Service Rate- Ending CUST lal X10001 Revenues 1G00GL 1004 01 Char it - - 1985 14.543 3.452,000 17,053,(100 12. i`4 10.260 1986 16.089 3, 625, O:+G 7.429.00.' 2'05 4.491 1987 16.8113 3.806,0 ,4 7, 800,0(4 2.05 1988 171737 3.99611)00 9 360,000 2.34 0.462 14.3% . 0.998 BY, 1189 1S1146 4,156,00(' 10.108,0i`0 2'43 6.7% 1990 19.184 4,3221 0'?0 II.:'12.Ou0 2.59 0.940 Wastewater Service 1/res.cust/mo. 1 Of Total Avg. Avg. Vebt4 Fossible FY Res Res Rev. Serv. Rate Ending Cust, Rev's- Res Cust~ Res. CLSt. Chariot - 1985+ 14,70'1 12,010.000 111.39 12.87 no chance 1986 159445 21111,000 11.39 3.16 no change 1987 16.2BO 2,216.000 11.34 3.75 no chanoe 1988 16,885 2.14(151(1'?:' 11,37 3.60 no change 1989 17,568 2.397,40.; 1i. 3i 3.83 no mange 1990 18,279 29493,000 11.36 3.149 n7 :nange 4 Cost of debt service per k„h. cr per 1004 gl., or per residential customer EXHIBIT VII DEBT TO EQUITY ANALYSIS x 1000) 16-Apr-85 Electric Water & Wastewater Fiscal Year Dollars Ratio Dollars Ratio Ending Debt 1 Equity Debt i Equity Debt 1 Equity Debt I Equity 1984 $13,583 1 $32,786 29 1 71 $10,301 1 $27,993 27 73 1985 $21,968 1 $34,299 39 1 61 $21,181 1 $30,748 41 1 59 i i 1986 $20,722 1 $36,545 36 1 64 $20,382 1 $32,685 38 1 62 1987 $26$352 1 $39003 40 1 60 $25,962 t $3..982 43 1 57 i 1988 $24,921 1 $429014 37 1 63 $259009 $34,458 42 1 58 1969 $289791 1 $46,530 38 1 62 $44,608 1 $35,508 56 1 44 1990 $27,338 1 $49,412 36 1 64 $43,169 1 $361531 54 1 46 System Total Fiscal Year Dollars Ratia Ending Debt 1 Equity Debt 1 Equity 1924 $23,884 i $60,779 28 1 72 1985 $43,149 1 $65,047 40 1 60 1986 $41,104 1 $69,230 37 1 63 1987 1154,314 1 $72,985 42 1 58 1968 $49,930 1 $76,472 40 1 60 1989 $73,399 1 $82018 47 1 53 1990 $709507 1 $85,943 45 1 55 s e 1985-90 UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTED CUSTOMERS AVERAGE ANNUAL POPULATION GROWTH (4.6%) ELECTRIC WATER WASTEWATER 35000 30000 25000 20000 C U 15000 S T 0 10000 M E R 5000 S 0 85 86 87 88 89 90 85 86 87 88 89 90 85 86 87 88 89 90 YEARS ELECTRIC WATER WA'jTEWATER 1985 249700 16,700 149900 1986 26,200 17,t•00 155600 1987 21,400 18,300 16,500 1988 28,700 199200 17,100 1989 30 000 19,900 17,800 • 1990 31,400 20,700 18,500 I 1985-90 UTILITY CIP TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SOURCE OF FUNDS X 1000) $18000 X1075. 16000 .743 14000 3 . 97. 3 3 12000 ® X830, 10000 606 8 3 8 321 THOUSANDS 8000 110 OF 6000-11 DOLLARS 4000 85 9 18 730 1 1 1332 2000 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 AID IN CONSTRUCTION & OTHER CURRENT REVENUE BONDS i 19P5-90 UTILITY C1P PROJECTED ELECTRIC SALES 4% INCREASE PER YEAR 800 782 775 50 752 725 723 MILLIONS 700 695 • OF KWNS 675 662 650 631 625 600 575 550 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEARS i • 1985-90 WILITY CIP ELECTRIC REVENUES 8 DEBT SERVICE PER KWH 12, 10.06 10.06 9.87 10 9.17 9.51 8.76 8 6 • CENTS PER KWH 4 2 0 I 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEARS TOTAL COST/KWH DEBT SERVICE 1985-90 UTILITY CIP PROJECTED WATER SALES 3.5% INCREASE PER YEAR 4.50 4,32 4.25 4.16 4,00 4.00 3.81 3.75 3.63 BILLIONS 3.50 3.45 • Of GALLONS 3.7.5 3.00 2.75 2.50 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEARS • 1985.90 UTILITY CID AVERAGE WATER REVENUES 6 DEBT SERVICE PER 1000 GALLONS 3.0 2.59 2.5 2.43 .34 2.04 2.05 2.05 2 2.0 PER 1000 1.5 GALLONS 1.0 0.5 .3 .9 1 0.0 , 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEARS TOTAL COST/1000 GALLONS DEBT SERVICE 77 1985-90 UTILITY CIP AVEkAGE WASTEWATER ..VENUES b DEBT SERVICE PER RESIDENTIAL CWS (.IER 12 11.39 11.39 11,34 11.37 11.3; 11.36 10 B s PER MONTH 6 4 2 2,8 3.1 3. 3< 3. 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEARS TOTAL COST PER AVG. RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER DEBT SERVICE • 1985-90 UTILITY CIP DEBT/EQUITY RATIO 70 60 50 PERCENT DEBT 40 30 20 N 10 / Ila 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEARS ELECTRIC W/WW TOTAL ELECTRIC 1985 39% 411 40% ~ WATER/WASTEWATER 1986 36 38 37 i TOTAL 1987 40 43 42 i 1988 37 42 40 1989 38 56 47 1990 36 54 45 A 4 iC , ~7 ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPARISON CF TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1985 CIP TO 1986 CIP X 1,000) $10,000 9,000 81000- 71000.6sCOO- Mom ofrd~ 5,000 mum- 4,000 31000_ 2,000 1,000 0 000 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 (s X 1,000) FY FY85 FY86 1985 CIP ENDING 1985 51050 49617 1986 CIP 1986 51211 8,821 1987 49617 71051 1988 4,913 60191 1989 51626 5 052 1990 .7777-7~7- 11-T ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPARISON OF TOTAL SALES REVENUES/KWH 1985 CIP TO 1986 CIP 11.00 10.00 and "no 9.00 CENTS/ KW nnu 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 FY FY85 FY86 1985 CIP ENDING Q/KWH t/KWH 1985 7.90 8.76 1986 CIP 1986 6.60 9.17 1987 9.14 9.57 1988 9.38 9.93 1989 9.72 10.12 1990 10 e Qom. . . • ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPARISON OF DEBT SERVICE COST V KW 1985 CIP TO 1986 CIP 1.0 CENTS/ 0.9 KWH 0.8- 0.7_ 0.6- teem • 0.5- 0.4_ 0.3 0,2 0.1 0.0 1985 1986 1981 1988 1989 1990 (4/KWH) 1985 CIP FY FY85 FY86 ENDING 1986 CIP 1985 .428 .444 1986 .463 .488 1987 .478 .462 1988 .501 .560 1989 .514 ,612 1990 ,569 0 • WATER SERVICE COMPARISON OF TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1985 CIP TO 1986 CIP {s X 1,000) $12,000 10,000 IBM DOLLARS 8,000 PER THOUSAND 6,000 4,000 2,000 0,000 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 FY 1985 1986 1985 CIP ENDING 1985 $4,684 $3.939 1986 CIP 1986 2,792 4,143 1987 1,284 51102 1988 1,416 21906 1989 8,973 9,740 1990 11,083 WATER SERVICE COMPARISON OF UNIT COST OF DEBT SERVICE 1985 C1P AND 1986 CIP 1.00 $/1000 0.90 GALLONS 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 t"m 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 FY 1985 1986 1985 C1P ENDING 1985 $.349 5.350 1986 CIP 1986 .409 .367 1987 J04 .468 1988 1 97 ,440 1989 .631 .997 1990 .921 WATER SERVICE COMPARISON OF TOTAL SALES REVENUES/1000 GALLONS 1985 CIP TO 1986 CIP $5.0 4.5 DOLLARS 4.0- PER 3.5 THOUSAND . GALLONS 3.4 2.5 2.0- 1. 51.0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 FY FY85 FY86 1985 CIP ENDING 1985 $2,100,000 $39452,000 1986 CIP 1986 2,260,000 31625,000 1987 29670,000 3,806,040 1988 21710,000 3,9969000 1989 2,750,000 4,156,000 1990 49322,000 WASTEWATER SERVICE COMPARISON OF TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1985 CIP AND 1986 CIP x 1,000) 3,000 2,500 2,000 DOLLARS PER 1,500 THOUSAND 1,000 0,500 0,000 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 X 1.000) 1985 CIP ENDING FY85 FYSb 1985 $1,044 $1,661 1986 CIP 1986 869 2,295 1987 761 10512 1988 11616 29250 '.589 904 1,260 1990 1,360 WASTEWATER SERVICE COMPARISON OF UNIT COST OF DEBT SERVICE 1985 CIP AND 1986 CIP (DEBT SERVICE PER MONTH PER RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER) $4.0 3.5 3.0 DOLLARS PER 2.5 THOUSAND • GALLONS 2.0_ 1.5- 1.0- 0.5 0.0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 FY 1985 1986 Iff 1985 CIP ENDING 1985 $1.60 $2.87 1986 CIP 1986 2.18 3.16 1987 1.84 3.75 1988 2.03 3.60 1989 1.82 3.79 1990 3.52 • I • WASTEWATER SERVICE COMPARISON Of AVERAGE REVENUE/RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER (DOLLARS/MONTH) 1985 CiP TO 1986 CiP 512.04 11.50 l 11.00 AVG. M0. BILL 10.50 . 10,00 9.50 9.00 _ 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 FY FY85 FY86 1985 CIP ENDING 1985 $10.22 $11.39 1986 CIP 1986 10.46 11.39 1987 10.66 11.34 1988 11.34 11.37 1989 11.68 11.37 1990 11.36 UTILITY SYSTEM PRO FORMA • IDOLLARS 1 10001 l0-Apr-S5 EXPTD FY FY FY FY FY FY REVENUES 1985 1986 1987 1968 1989 1990 Electric Sales $55,224 $60,746 166,517 111,839 $76,149 $79,195 Electric Mist 10116 694 910 505 685 463 Tepa & Other Off Sys. 14,902 11,671 81883 80961 91331 91047 Mater t M/W Sales 12,579 13,231 13,895 15,699 16,699 18,066 Mater t W/M Misc 959 799 695 535 11932 965 TOTAL REVENUES $84,781 $87,144 190,900 $97,538 $1049797 $107,756 EXPENDITURES Personal Services $5,349 $54777 16,239 $6,738 $7,277 $7,860 Supplies 572 606 643 681 722 766 Purchase Power t Fuel 54,262 58,235 61,698 64,504 68,201 69,572 Production Power W/M 11111 1,222 11338 11445 11532 1,593 Maintenance 11550 2,015 11628 11725 1,829 11938 Services 922 977 11036 1,098 1,164 1,234 Purchase Water 783 935 11113 894 400 294 Ins 6 Sundry 226 240 254 269 286 303 Administrative Trans 21073 21239 2,418 21611 21820 31046 Ray Roberts Pints 0 0 0 1,878 11882 1.886 TOTAL OPERATIONS $66,849 $72,246 $76067 181.845 $86,114 1^89491 NET OF OPERATIONS $17,932 $14,898 $14,533 115,693 $18,683 $19,265 NON OPERATINS EXPENDITURES Debt Service $5.023 $5,735 $6,455 $7,266 $10,260 $90977 Capital Improvesents 1,121 3,257 29734 30213 3.438 3,044 Other 113 96 I10 110 110 114 Bad Debt 276 304 333 359 331 396 Return on Investment 2.367 24409 2.584 2,847 31068 34321 TOTAL NON-OPER Elf $8.899 $11,601 $12,215 113,795 117.257 $16,852 TOTAL EXFENPITUPES $75,746 $841046 $68.562 $;5.640 $103,371 $105,344 feat a a% 2tas1 as a=a a a 2a 292299E =stilts 2229a 2a AIN !1055r ii,4;= f3,4=7 31,314 r,,r-E $j.42: 31.41.1 NET • ELECTRIC SERVICE PRO FORMA 11 x 10001 • i0-Apr-eS EXPTD FY FY FV FY FY FY 1985 1986 1987 1986 1989 1990 NET SALES 630,748 662,285 695,400 7239216 7529144 7829230 Rev C/KWH 8.76 9.17 9157 9.93 10.12 10.12 REVENUES Residential $17,999 419,799 $21,680 $23,414 $24,819 $25,812 Comsercial 32,425 35,668 39,056 42,180 44,711 46,500 Soverne 41474 41921 51309 51820 61169 61416 Other £l Sales 326 359 393 424 449 467 TMPA Coverage Aft 51659 61498 61905 6,924 6,940 6,950 TMPA Surplus 41870 21500 0 0 0 0 Wholesale Electric 11707 782 130 0 Off Sys Sales 21666 15892 1,848 21036 21359 21087 Inter Qarnedl 765 270 585 180 360 159 Other 351 424 325 325 323 --.-325 REVS 71,242 73,112 76,311 81,305 86,165 88,125 PUR POW k FUEL tents/KWH 6.12 6.72 7.16 7.22 7.36 7,27 EXPENDITURES • Personal Services 13,064 $3,309 $39574 $3,860 $4,169 $4,502 supplies ^69 285 302 320 339 360 Purchase Paw k Fu 54,262 58,233 61,698 64,504 68,201 69,572 Maintenance 858 11281 850 901 955 1,012 Services 479 508 538 570 605 641 Ins k Sundry 156 166 176 166 197 209 Adsin Transfert -.11268 -_11369 --1,479 _.1,597 _-1,725 __1,863 TOTAL EXPS $60,356 1651153 1689617 571,939 $76,191 $78,159 . • NET OFER REVS $10,886 $7,959 $7,694 19,366 $9,974 $10,566 DEBT SERV COVER 3.88 2.46 2.40 2.31 2.17 2.37 CAP AND OTHER NON OPER EAP Capital improvesent $931 611368 $2,141 $2,639 $2,817 $2,402 Debt Service 21804 31233 39211 4,049 4,600 41451 Other 100 96 110 If0 110 110 Bad Debt 276 304 333 359 381 396 Ret On Inv Trans _.11690 --1,689 -_1,745 -.1:627 '-1,956 --21115 TOT NON OPER EXP 15,801 $6,690 171'140 $9,004 199863 $9,474 • TOTAL E1PEN017URES 166,157 171,842 116,156 180,943 $36,055 187,633 slsssr masses aaseS" !s l ale &$-Sea seeate NET GAIN 1LOSS1 $5.085 11,270 1154 $361 $111 11,092 DEBT SERVICE )).WP.. IC1 0.444 0.488 0.462 0.560 01612 0.569 .Er ♦ lam.': X. EIELIRIC SE4VICE FAD FORMA Percent Change Annual Projected Changes FY '86 FY 17 FY '88 FY '89 FY '90 REVENUES 4------------------------------------------------4 Residential 1 10.0% 9.5% 6.0% 6.0% 4.C% Coesercial 1 10.0% 9.5% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 1 Governs 10.01 9.511 8.0% 6.01 4.0% 1 Other E1 Sales 1 10.0% 9.5% 8.0% 6.01 4.0% 1 Inter (earnedl 1 10.01 9.5% 8101 6.0% 4.0% 1 Other 1 10.0% 9.51 8101 6.0% 4.01 1 4------------------------------------------------♦ Expenses EXPENDITURES Personal Services 1 8101 8.0% 6.0% 9.0% 8.0% 1 Supplies 1 6.0% 6.0% 6.01 6001 6.0% 1 Purchase Pow and Fu 1 7.3% 5.9% 4.5% 5.7% 2.071 1 Maintenance 1 49.2% -33.6% 6.0% 6.0% 6.01 1 Services i 6.0% 6.0% 6.01 6.0% 6.0% 1 Ins. 6 Sundry 1 6.01 6.01 6.0% 6.0% 6.01 1 • Ads Irans 1 6.0% 8.0% °.01 8.0% 8.0% 1 +------------------------------------------------4 CAP AND OTHER NON OF'E 4------------------------------------ Capital Improvement 1 46.9% 56.5% 24.2% 5.9% -14.7% I Debt Service 1 15.32 -0.7% 26.1% 13.61 -3.2% 1 Other 1 -4.07: 14.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1 Bad Debt 1 10.0% 9.5% 9.0% 6.0% 4.0% 1 Rot on Inv Irani 1 .O% 3.3% 4.7% 7.0% 8.2% 1 *------------------------------------------------4 Debt Service & Bond lsiues Bond Debt Service Sales F'r 95 FY 'Bb FY '87 FY 86 FY '69 FV '91) Series 1983 16,432 2.154 24079 2,077 21044 2,016 19914 1994 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1985 9.500 649 11154 1.134 1,115 11096 11076 199b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967 7,000 0 0 0 640 626 912 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 5.500 0 0 0 0 660 649 1990 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 . :e, 4:i i,sUi ,i53 3.:•11 4,x49 4,..t 4.451 COMBINED WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE PRO FORMA • if w 10001 16-Apr-85 EXPTD FY FY FY FY FY FY REVENUES 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 M - Residential Mater 3,392 3,602 31926 4011 54089 51648 Commercial Mater 31453 3,605 30930 4,716 5493 54653 Resale Mater 148 158 173 207 222 237 Other Water 60 64 70 71 74 74 Non Operating 600 591 446 286 1,674 701 Res. Wst.Mtr. Fees 21010 21iil 24216 21305 20397 21493 Come. Wst.Wtr, Fees 34344 30511 3,6P7 30834 31988 44147 Whole, Mst,Mtr, Fels 143 150 157 163 170 177 Other Wst.Wtr. Fees 30 30 32 32 33 34 Non Oper Wst.Wtr. Rev 359 206 250 250 257 245 TOTAL REVS 13,536 14,029 14,885 16,574 18,996 19,427 EXPENDITURES Personnal Services 2,285 2,544 20748 21969 30205 3,462 Supplies 303 364 385 409 433 459 Production Power 14111 11157 14272 11358 10450 14549 • Maintenance 692 985 14044 11107 1,173 1,243 Purchase Mater 783 935 14113 894 400 294 Services 443 1,246 1,320 1,400 1,484 1,573 Insurance and Summary 70 70 75 79 04 89 Adsin Transfers 805 870 940 11015 14096 11184 Ray Roberts Psts 0 0 0 14878 11882 11896 TOTAL EXP5 6,492 8,170 84897 111107 11,207 11,739 NET 6PER REVS 7,046 51859 5,988 5,467 7,789 79890 DEBT SERV COVER 3.56 2.27 1.80 1.66 1.36 1.37 CAP AND OTHER NON OPER EXP Capital Improvement% 190 11889 593 554 621 64? Debt Service 14980 21577 31331 31305 5,745 51609 Other 13 0 0 0 0 0 Bad Debt 63 66 71 s0 65 1? Rot on Inv Trans 734 719 787 882 937 914 TOT NON OPER EXP 2.979 54251 4,782 4,819 7.382 7,332 TOT OFER li NON OPEA EXP 9.471 13.422 13,679 15,926 18,515 19,069 t ilfff fiitfi ■iffii was 22 Vasil! itii l,f NET BAIN (LOSS) 4,(67 608 1,206 648 401 3rg MATER SERVICE PROFORMA 1$ x 1000) 16-Ap►-85 EXPTD FY FY FY FY FY FY 1985 0186 1987 1988 1989 1990 MILL GAL SALES 31452 3,625 31806 3,996 41156 4,322 COST /1000 GALS 2.22 2.21 2.24 2.50 2.92 2.85 REVENUES RESIDENTIAL 3,392 31602 30926 4j711 50088 54648 CDMMERCIAL 3,453 31605 34930 41116 51093 50653 RESALE 148 158 173 207 222 237 OTHER SALES 60 64 70 71 74 74 NON OPERATING 600 591 446 2B6 1,676 701 TOTAL REVS 7,653 80021 8 544 9.990 12,152 12;312 EXPENDITURES PERSONNAL SERVICES 1,182 14418 1,531 14653 11786 11928 SUPPLIES 165 232 246 261 276 293 PRODUCTION POWER 613 674 741 801 865 934 MAINTENANCE 469 680 720 764 609 858 PURCHASED HATER 783 935 14113 894 400 294 SERVICES 228 11012 1,072 16137 1,205 1,277 INSURANCE AND SUNDR 28 28 30 32 34 36 ADMIN TRANSFERS 602 435 470 507 548 592 RAY ROBERTS PMTS 0 0 0 1,878 1,882 11886 TOTAL EXPS 4,070 5,413 5,924 7,927 11805 81098 NET OPER REVS 3.583 2,608 2,620 2,064 40347 4,214 DEBT SERV COVER 3.70 1.86 1.40 1.12 1.05 1.04 CAPI1 AND OTHER NON OP CAPISAL IMPROVEMENTS 78 1,359 219 286 241 300 DEBT SERVICE 967 1,406 1,868 1,845 4,146 4,063 OTHER (SFECIAL FROJ 13 0 0 0 0 0 BAD DEBT 35 37 40 49 52 Be REY ON INV TRANS 339 360 326 336 309 285 TOT NONOPER 14432 3,162 24453 24519 4.749 41106 701 OPER 0 NON OPER E 5.502 81574 8,377 10.445 12.554 12,804 112a aaa as It It as aaa l 2a of aQaa lassos aaaaas 1ET GAIN (LOSS) 12,110 11554) $167 (14541 (1402) 11492) Debt Cost /1000 oil 10,280 10,388 $0.491 $0,462 10,990 10,940 MATER SERVICE PROFORMA Percent ChanQe • FY '66 FY 087 FY '88 FY '89 FY '90 REVENUES Residntial 1 6.2% 9101 20.0% 8.0% 11.01 1 Commercial 1 4.4% 910% 20.0% 8.01 11.01 1 Resale 1 7.0% 910% 20.0% 810% 11.01 1 Other Sales 1 7.7% 9.01 20.0% 8.0% 11.0% 1 Non Operalinq 1 -1.5% -24.6% -35.9% 486.9% -58.21 1 FY '86 FY '87 FY 186 FY '69 FY '90 Personnal Services 1 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.01 1 Supplies 1 40.7% 6.0% 610% 6.01 6.0% 1 Production Power I 9.9% 1010% 6.0% 8.0% 8.0% 1 Maintenance 1 44.9% 6.0% 6.0% 6.01 6.0% 1 Purchased Water I 19.4% 19.1% -19,7% -55.2% -26.6% 1 Services 1 343.7% 6.0% 610% 6.0% 6.0% 1 insurance and Sundr I 113% 6.07 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 1 Admin Transfers i -27.7% 8.0% 810% 8.0% 8.0% 1 CAPiT AND OTHER NON 0 " Capital leprovesent I 1633.8% -83.9% 3114% -16.41 24.51 1 Debt Service 1 45,31 32.9% -1.2% 124.7% -2.0% 1 Otherispecial Pro11 1 -100.01 0.01 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1 O Bad Debt 1 5.3% 9.0% 19.8% 7.9% 10.8% 1 Ret On Inv Trans I 6,21 -9.2% 3.1% -8.11 -7.8% 1 Debt Service i Bond Issues Bond Debt Service FY '40 Sales FY 65 FY '86 FY '87 FY '88 FY '89 Series 1993 2,949 387 373 373 376 3620 340 1984 0 0 0 0 0 1985 81500 581 14033 11015 998 9840 963 1986 0 0 0 0 0 IY87 4.000 0 0 480 472 464 456 1488 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1989 190500 0 0 C 0 2,340 2.301 1990 0 0 0 _ 0 0 34.949 ---967 1.406 14868 -1,845 -4.146 4.063 WASTEWATER SERVICE PRO FORMA • 1$ x 10001 16-Apr-95 EXPTD FY FY FY FY F': FY 1983 1986 1981 1988 1989 1990 ANN CU5T BILLS 178,805 187,744 197,761 205,015 211,165 217,500 AV Mo'ly Cost/Gust 32.92 32.00 32,07 32.11 32.41 32.71 REVENUES Residential Faes 12,010 42,111 12,216 $2,305 $2,397 $2,493 Commercial Fees 31344 30511 :11687 31834 3,988 41147 Wholesale Fees 143 ISO 157 163 170 177 Intragov Fees 7 S 8 8 6 9 Other Wst. Wtr. Fees 23 22 24 24 24 25 Non Oper Revs 359 200 250 250 251 ?b5 TOTAL REVS $5,886 16,009 $6,341 $6,584 $6,844 $7,115 EXPENDITURES Personal Services $1,103 $1,127 11,217 $1,315 $1,420 $1,533 Supplies 138 131 139 148 157 166 Production Power 498 483 531 558 586 615 • Maintenance 223 305 324 343 364 385 Services 215 234 248 763 279 296 fns and Sundry 42 42 44 47 SO 53 Admin Transfers 204 435 470 507 548 592 TOTAL EXPS 2,422 29758 21974 31180 31402 39640 NET OF OPERATIONS $3,463 43,251 $3,368 $3,403 139442 13,475 DEBT SERV COVER 3.42 2.78 2.30 2.34 2.15 2.25 CAP AND OTHER NON OPER EXP Cip:tal Improvements $112 $530 1374 $266 $380 $347 Debt Service 11012 11171 11463 1,457 11398 10545 Other Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bad Debt 28 29 30 32 33 34 Ret On Irv Trans 395 360 461 .546 628 699 TOT NON OPEA EXP $1,547 $2,090 12,318 $2,301 12,639 $2,625 TOT OP 1, NON OP EXP $3,969 $4,847 154302 154481 $69041 $64265 ■222e■ a22a92 092022 1122292 222a9■ 02t222 NET GAIN (LOSS) $1,917 $1,161 $1.039 $1,102 $903 1850 DEBT SERVICE PER MON-HLY Residential tilling 12.87 $3.16 13.75 13,80 13.83 $3.39 Wastewater Service Pro Forea Percent Change F1 '66 FY '87 FY 88 FY '69 FY '90 REVENUES .......................................1 Residential Feet 1 5.0% 510% 410% 4.01 4.01+ 1 Cossercial Feet I 5,0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.01 1,01 f Wholesale Fees 1 5.0% 500% 4101 400% 4.0% Intragov fees 1 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% 3.0% 3.0% i Other Wit, Wtr. Fees 1 -3.71 7.7% 0.01 3.0% 3.01 1 Non Oper Revs 1 -42.21 20.2% 0.0% 3.0% 310% ~ FY '86 FY '87 FY '88 F+ '89 FY '90 EXPENDITURES 4-•----------------------------------------------- Personal Services 1 6.0% 8.0% 8101 800% 840% I Supplies 1 -5,0% 6.0% 6.01 6.0% 6.0% 1 Production Power 1 -3,0% 10.0% 510% 510% 510% 1 Maintenance 1 3619% 6.01 610% 6.01 6.0% Services 1 819% 6.0% 6.01 610% 6.01 1 Ins and Sundry 1 -0.1% 610% 610% 6.0% 6.01 Adain Transfars 1 114.3% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 1 + FY '86 FY '87 FY '88 FY '69 FY '90 CAP AND DINER NON OPER 4------• Capital laproveaents 1 374,8% -29.5% -28.8% 4218% -8.7% Debt Service 1 15.7% 24.9% -0,4% 9.7% -3.31 f Other Expeditures 1 0.0% 0.0% 010% 0.0% 0.0% f . Bad Debt 1 5.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 1 Rat On Inv trans 1 -9.0% 28.2% 18.4% 15.0% 11.3% 1 Debt Service s Bond Issues Bond Debt Service Sales FY '85 FY '86 FY '87 FY '88 FY '89 FY '90 Series 1983 5.898 773 746 745 752 724 681 1984 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 1985 3.500 239 425 418 411 404 396 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1957 2,500 0 0 300 295 290 .65 1988 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1989 11500 0 0 0 0 180 177 1990 0 0 U 0 1) 0 0 13.398 11012 1,171 14463 14457 1.598 1.545 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SOURCE OF FUNDS ELECTRIC SYSTEM . i1,000,S► 1986_1990- CIF-Total Bond fund Cur. -Rev Misc~-Rkv~ Other 1986 10,821 7,306 3.368 110 37 1987 8,01L2 4,152 3,141 122 37 1988 61191 3,299 21659 120 113 1989 5,952 2.993 2,817 94 48 1990 5,052 2,393 2,402 .'.5 -_142 36,068 20,743 14,387 561 377 1985_1989- CIP -Total Bond -Fund Cur-.-Rev- Misc.-key. Other 1985 51050 31523 1,364 100 63 1986 5,211 3.702 1,367 105 37 1987 4,516 2.614 11856 116 37 198A 44913 3,4?3 1,207 120 113 1989 5.626 3.855 1.626 94 48 ---25,316 17,170 ---•7.420 535 235 Difference between 1986-89 CIF and 1985-89 CIF for vears 1986 through 1965. 1985-1989 CIF Total Banc Furd Cut. Rev. Mist. Rev. Other 604 2.001 6 198b .+.61,i 1987 3.429 :.136 1.285 c 0 1988 1.210 1174) 1,452 0 1989 26 dos) 1,191 . - . - - Additional 10.643 3 5.929 II (Reduction) • April I F1Vf YEAR WJIAL MOON INAN QIYISION ghY1RV ELECTRIC SERVICE FY Ending 1985 ELECTRIC PROD1 ION 4's1,040 ECLECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 1,555,409 ELECTRIC METERINWASTATIONS 2,460,004 MISCELLANEOUS 504,000 TOTAL 1983+ 4,567,000 FY Ending 1986 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 21644,000 ECLECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 31193,000 ELECTRIC METERING/St18STAT)ONS 11162,000 MISCELMEM 11221,000 TOTAL 19U 81811,000 FY Ending 1987 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION ECLECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 2,3151800 ELECTRIC METERINB/SUBSTATIONS 21836,000 MISCELLANEOUS 11322,004 $78,000 • TOTAL 1987 7,051,000 FY Ending 1988 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 21213,000 ECLECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 21474,000 ELECTRIC METERIWSU8STA1IONS 11041,000 M1SCEtLANEOUS 463,000 TOTAL 1988 61191,000 FY Ending 1989 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 114991000 ECLECTRIC DISTR)BUT101t 2,6621000 ELECTRIC METER INV$ UBSTAT, ONS 5250004 MISCELLANEOUS 123,000 TOTAL 1989 41811,000 FY Ending 1990 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 5651000 ECLECTRIC DISTR1BOM 310151000 ELECTRIC MEIERIN3!SUBSTAIIONS 8771000 MISCELLANEOUS 395,000 • TOTA! 1990 510510000 • TOTAL FIVE YEAR CIP 31,916,000 *Note: 1985 not included cAPITELEALCTA IMP PLA1I IL3TY 19. 6 PROJECT PROJECT BCMD CURA171T MISCELLANDOUS NUMBER DWRIPTION TOTAL run AEV)2OUE REVEM OTMER Electric Production St-a-1 Pumps 114 63,000 0 61,000 0 0 66-EP-2 14 Turbine 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 86-1x-3 14 and IS Turbine, Motor control 250,000 2SO,000 0 0 0 1164P-4 Miscellaneous Power Plant PePlacenent 35,000 0 35,000 0 0 66-EP-S Lewisville Hydro 1,980,000 1,980,000 0 0 0 66-EP-6 security Pence 16,000 0 16,000 0 0 ~l_eetri~e Distribution Street Light - Residential 60,000 0 10,000 10,000 O 84-tD-2 street light - Ariertal 45,000 45,000 0 0 0 66-W-3 Street I.I#t - security 22,000 22,000 0 0 0 66-0-4 Street Light - ConverelOA 60,000 80,000 0 0 0 66-ED-S Overhead Distribution - Extensions/Improvements 484,000 160,000 294,000 10,000 0 Power Factor Improvements 69,000 0 69,000 0 0 86-DO-6 Underground Distribution - rmtensions/ Improvements 651,000 300,000 281,000 70,000 0 86-ED-6A Underground - Pecan, walnut 354,000 354,010 0 0 0 86-ED-7 Trans formers/tquip of 820,000 620,Ot0 0 0 0 06-ED-5 Motor Purl 228,000 0 191.000 0 37,000 86-0-9 Rlxcollanoous Tools/CquitAwt 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 86-FD-1D Pight-of-tray/tasements 30,000 0 30,000 0 0 86-ED-it Acquisition of facilities vithin City limits 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 Bt-ED-12 economic retder Condxtor Replacement 75,000 0 15,000 0 0 tlectrlc Metering/Substations B6-M/SS-1 North take Substation Duplex SP0,000 580,000 0 0 O 86-M/6S-2 Radio fquipoent 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 B6-N/FS-1 Metering/Substations Equiltwnt 11440) 267,000 134,000 13,000 - 0 0 B6-M/SS-4 IS VV Breaker teplacemrnt 216,000 216,000 0 0 0 86-M/SS-5 ttlrre)lancous Tool s/rqulpment 14,000 0 14,000 0 O 86-M/SS-6 Noith Lake Screening 45,000 45,000 0 0 0 i 86-M/SS-1 Motor Pool IS,000 0 IS,000 0 C 86-M/SS-8 12000 cvstoaw:rs) Load lWnagement 400,000 400,000 0 0 0 Nlactltaneuun B6-tM-1 Miscellaneous Oflice/rurnlture 30,000 0 10,000 0 0 66-EM-2 Coopiter 20,000 0 20.000 0 0 66-EX-3 CAD Map System 400.000 400,000 0 0 0 6t-121-4 Motor Pool 12,000 0 12,000 0 C ec-rx-S Service Center 400,000 400,000 0 0 R 06-EM-6 Solar NN Pilot Program 60,000 0 60,000 0 C R6-EM-7 Customer tfficitncy Incentive Program 3001000 300,000 0 0 0 TOTAL 1995-66 CAPITAL IMPAOVVWVT 6,021,000 7,)06,000 1,366,000 110,000 17,OCr. 1985.1990 CIP V ertfic Di.1tr CIP CAPITAL IMPR'- F]rT PLAN • ELECTPIt iTY 1M i PROJECT PROJECT BONA CUPPrRT MISCLGt./WEOUS NUMBER DESCPIPTION TOTAL rIMD PrI13 E PEVEM OTHER Electric Production 7-EM Force Draft ran IS 74,000 0 74,000 0 0 87-EP-2 Ray Poberts Hydro 241,000 241,000 0 O 0 17-0-3 Lewisville Hydro 1,056,000 1,058,000 0 0 0 67-EP-4 Burner Control 14 476,000 476,000 0 0 0 67-EP-5 14 Turbine blade KP 110,000 0 110,000 0 0 07-0-6 Miscellaneous Power Plant Equipment 38,000 0 36,000 0 0 87-3i-7 ClR Pump 14 68,000 0 68,000 0 0 87-EP-8 14 6 S Turbine 250,000 250,000 O 0 0 lectric Distribution tD- Street Light - Residential 65,000 0 30,000 IS,DDO 0 87-ED-2 Street Light - Arterial 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 87-ED-3 Street Light - Security 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 67-tD-3A Street Light - Conversion 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 87-EO-4 Overhead Distribution - Extensions/tmprovement■ 364,000 0 352,000 12,000 0 Power factor Improvements 76,000 0 76,000 0 O 07-ED-S Underground Distribution-Extensions/improvements 477,000 0 402,000 75,000 0 87-M-SA Downtown Underground - Cedar 146,000 146,000 0 0 0 07-ED-6 Trans forrers/Equipment 767,000 524,000 241,000 0 07.20-1 Motor Pool 131,000 0 111,500 0 19,500 67-ED-8 Miscellaneous Tools/rqulpent 75,000 O 7S,000 0 V 87-ED-9 Pight-of-May/Easements 30,000 0 70,000 0 0 87-ED-10 Acquisition of Facilities within City Limits 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 07-ED-11 rconomie reeder Conductor Replacement 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 Electric Meterir Substations 87-M/65-1 Aodra S on Transformer 280,000 280,000 0 0 0 IS6KV Bus 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 15 KY Switchgear 100,000 160,000 0 0 0 Construction IS0,000 ISo,00c 0 0 0 67-I1/SS-2 Podia tquilaent 30,000 0 30,000 0 0 87-M/SS-3 SCADA tquipaent 45,000 0 45,000 0 0 87-M/89-4 Meters/Associated Equiie*nt (1274) 164,000 126,000 16,000 0 0 67-N/50-5 Motor pool 16,000 0 6,000 0 10,000 81-M/SS-6 Miscellaneous Tools/Equipment 1),000 0 1),000 0 0 f 67-HAS-7 Denton Korth Screening 00,000 0 80,000 0 0 81-M/SS-8 Communication Lite - Audre 14,000 14,000 0 0 0 07-M/6S-9 Load Management 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 Miscs)lsneous T-r".1 Mlscellaheoue Office Machines/rurniture 3S,000 0 15,000 0 0 61-1]t-2 Motor Pool 11,000 0 6,000 0 7,000 87-!)t-3 CAD Map system 200,000 0 200,000 0 0 87-CM-1 Customer Efficiency incentive program 210,000 ))0,000 0 0 0 TOTAL 1986.07 CAPITAL IKPp0YM31T 7,051,000 40151,000 2,140,500 122,000 !6,500 1-S-BS CAPITAL IMlow"24L7lT PLAIT 1 ELECfRit UTILITY 147-a PR(~tECr PROJtat mcm CUMRM M1SMLANDO" NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL REYL7NE R l" d1"n Electric Production BB-Ep-I Motor for, PS101 14,000 0 6,000 0 6.000 as-IF-2 Miscsllsmc~ A Power Plant rqulpmnt 25,000 0 25,008 0 0 88-rp-1 Aar RONKts v 'ro 1,201,000 1,201,000 0 0 0 BB-EP-4 Leviaville My 712,000 772,000 0 0 0 BB-vp-s Unit 1 5 2 O, u_, 201,000 0 201,000 0 0 Ele,tric Distrlbut tc X ED-1 t•e , Light - Residential (Mew) 70,000 0 10.000 40,000 0 $B-M-2 treat Light - Arterial 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 88-64 I 6treet Light $scurtty 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 5$-10-4 overhead OtstriDutiot txtensirna/Isprovesonts 481,000 0 481,000 0 0 EU-5 Undergr, !nd Distrlbutton - rstensions/ Irprovements 707,000 0 627,000 $0,000 0 86-rD-6 Tra'-".ormers 707,000 0 707,000 0 0 r- hors (Mev) S2,D00 0 82,000 0 0 1.e1/Equipment 50,000 0 S0,000 0 0 86-tD-7 Mir, ellaneous Tools/Equipment 80,000 0 80,000 0 O se-ED-8 PcItor Pool 10c,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 se-1A-9 Might-of-May/Easesents 35,000 0 15,000 0 0 88-ri7-10 Eoonosic reader Conductor Replacesi nt 85,000 0 $5,000 0 0 Elrctrlc Meterin /SuDatatlonI 8- 6S-1 A rport Duplex 6501000 650,000 0 0 O 88-M/BS-2 Radio rquippoent 35,000 0 15,000 0 0 88-M/80-1 Meters/Associated Equipment 112:1) 17$,000 118,000 40,000 0 0 88-MASS-4 Motor Pool 54,000 0 19,000 0 'S'OW Bx Miscellaneous Toola/Equileent 24,000 0 24,000 0 0 68-S/4-6 Load Managestent 100,000 100.000 0 0 0 Miscel' e- ous B-flt-i Miscellaneous cost{roter Mardvare/Soflwere 50,OOf! 0 50,000 0 0 88-W-2 Motor Pool 1G, ; 0 16,000 0 14,000 88-rA-1 Miscellaneous Office Machines/rvrnitare 20,000 O 20,000 0 0 S8-P21-4 Customer Efficiency ' entive Progras ` '.1,000 J63,000 0 4 0 0 TOTAL. 1987-88 CAPITAL IMPAf2V0"? A,191.0-0 111" 000 2,661,000 120,000 16S,000 D1sR1 CIO 4.5-85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN t'LECTRIC UTILITY 1988-89 PR.IIECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT MISCELLANmts WOMEN DESCRIPTKN' TO'T'AL FUND PVVEN R: RE%PLM CrrHEH Electric Production 89-EP-1 Miscellaneous Powc Plant Equilmxnt 40,000 0 40,000 0 0 89-EP-2 Power Supply 45 41,000 O 41,000 0 0 09-EP-3 Roberts Hydro 1,416,000 1,416,000 0 0 0 Electric Distribution 69-rD-1 Street Light - Residential 75,000 0 35,000 40,000 0 89-ED-2 Street Light - Arterial 55,000 S5,000 0 0 0 69-ED-3 Street Light - Security 30,000 30,000 0 0 O 89-FD-4 Overhead Distribution - Extensions/Tmprovements 544,000 0 $44,000 0 0 Correction to .98 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 89-ED-5 Underground Distribution - Extensions/ Improvements 796,000 0 742,000 54,000 0 09-ED-6 Transformers/rquipaent 790,000 0 790,000 0 C 09-M-7 Mctor Pool Replacement 64,000 0 26,000 0 32,000 89-ED-8 Miscellaneous Tools/Egafprent 68,000 0 se,000 O 0 89-ED-9 Right-of-Way/Easements 40,000 0 40,000 C 0 69-M-30 Econciie reader Conductor Replacement 90,000 0 60,000 0 0 Electric Materln /Subatatlor%s W- SS-1 Ryan Sabstat on Duplex 600,000 680,000 0 0 0 89-N/69-2 Radio rquipwnt 90,000 0 90,000 0 0 89-M/66-3 Kite ra/Associated Equipment (1)111 196,000 152,000 44,000 0 0 A9-M/6E-4 SCADA Equipment 160,000 160,000 0 0 0 89-M/66-S motor Pool IS,000 0 5,000 0 20,000 89-M/SS-6 Miscellaneous Tools/Lquipa,ent 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 !9-"/S%-7 Load Management 100),000 100,000 0 0 0 Mirv!lansous ff0!-11 " Hlscsllaneocs Office Equipment 45 (AA 0 45,000 0 O 89-EM-2 Computer Programs 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 WE"-3 Customer Efficiency loceative Program 400,000 400,000 0 0 r TOTAL 1988-89 CAPITAL IMPAOVMENT 1,942,000 2,993,000 !,817,000 54,000 42,000 CVP Electric Disk? CIP 4-5-85 CAPITAL IMPROMUNT PLAN IY.ECTFIC UMITY 19s9-90 PRWDCf PRWECr BOND C(I"M MISCELLANEOUS NUMBEA DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND RM11 t - REVENUE OTHER Electric Production 90-EP-1 Replace Acid Tank for Caroling Sower 40,000 0 40,000 0 0 90-EP-2 AP 1/2" Valves with 2" on 1,7,3,4 Boilers 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 90-EP-3 44 Powr supply 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 90-EP-4 New votes Demineralir.ers 750,000 250,0')0 0 0 0 90-EP-S Xlecellanmus Plant Replacea,ent 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 90-EP-6 Cooling Tower Penovatton 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 Electric Distribution WED-. Street Light - Pesidentlal 85,000 0 50100' 35,000 0 90-CD-2 Street Light - Arterial 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 90-ED-3 Street tight - Security 33,000 33,000 0 0 0 90-60-4 Overheod Distribution - Cxtensions/Improvements 591,000 0 $81,000 10,000 0 Power 'ictor Improvement 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 90-ED-S Underground Distribution - Extensions/ improvements 865,000 795,000 0 70,000 0 90-ED-6 Tr a Asformers/EquIlime At 858,000 956,000 0 0 0 90-EO-7 Motor Pool Replacement 188,000 0 71,000 0 %17,000 90-ED-9 Nlocellaneous Twls/rquipment 95,000 0 95,000 0 0 90-EO-9 Right-of-Nay/Easements 45,000 0 45,000 D 0 90-ED-10 Ecosrsie Feeder Conductcr Replacement 9S,000 0 95,000 0 0 Electric Metering/SuLstatione 90- s4-1 central Dispatch Control Center 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 90-M/SS.2 Capacitor Control 00,000 0 $0,000 0 0 90-9/019-3 6creeninq--X1ng, Hickory 90,000 90,000 0 0 0 90-pt/SS-4 Metets,fAssociated Equipment {1144) 212,000 165,1,00 41,000 0 0 90-M/SS-5 Motor Ptiol 35,000 0 20,000 0 15,000 90-M/69-6 Hiecelta%~ous Tools/Equipment 30,000 0 10,000 0 0 90-M/SS-7 Load Mana;,i"nt 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 9brm-l~ Computer - Hardware/Software p^0000 0 80,000 0 Q 90-1711-2 Office Egvlpoenl 5000710 0 50,000 0 0 90-EM-1 motor Pool 25,000 0 15,000 0 1:x,000 ~ 90-EA-4 Customer tfflciency Incentive Program 440,000 440,000 0 0 0 "Al, 1989-90 CAPITAL IMPXW 14M 4,992,000 3,191,000 1,544,000 115,000 142,000 risks tip FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SOURCE OF FUNDS WATER I. iiASTEW0ER SYSTEM ik.000'S► Aid-in 1986-1990 C1P Tots'. Bond Fund Cur. Rev, const. Other 1986 2.858 90 2,212 450 lob 1967 716%1 b,500 643 450 88 :16a 11151 0 554 450 147 1989 22,399 21.000 622 550 227 1990 1.512 0 694 550 268 35,601 27,590 4,725 2,450 836 Aid-1n 19x5-1989 CTP Total Bond Fund Cur. Rev. Const. Other 1985 5.729 4.934 372 361 62 198E 3.662 2,734 555 24- 118 1967 x.045 1.:, 495 255 e5 1966 :.094 2.250 442 255 147 1SE9 4.879 9.U24 372 255 228 24.405 2U.145 2.1:b 11361 644 Difference between ly'66-69 CIF, and 1965-69 L?P for vears 1986 throuan 1969. Aid-in 1985_1989- CIF Tot-' Eond -Fund Cur. -Rev. -Const. Other I 1980 18(141 {2.6441 l.ES 1;5 S1 r 19S7 146 1'?5 11 I9?9 1.94;1 2.. ..1 112 195 i -4'S 11 t>2; i 11,976 1`.41) 1 76 ..lb; 88r. 114! Addit.cnaI 'Reduction, R ::Y 1ri .k to Y ,.r .h April I FIVE YEAR WITAL IWRDV9M P1Mt DIVISION 911WKi WATER SERVICE FY E1diag 1985 WATER PRODUCTION 119061512 :CATER DISTRIBUTION 1,448,739 MUNICIPAL LABDRATDRY 29400 HI SULV#1EOU$ 37,500 TOTAL 19851 3,439,151 FY Ending 1986 WATER PRODUCTION 1,343,OD1 WATER DISTRUIBUT14N ,7669000 MUNICIPAL LABORATORY 01700 MISCELLANEOUS 25,000 TOTAL 1986 41142,700 FY Ending 1487 WATER PR0OLICTION 2,617,000 L47ER DISTRU+BUTION 21265,000 MUNICIPAL LABORATORY 20,400 • TOTAL 1987 5,102,400 FY Ending 1988 WATER PRODUC11ON 315,000 WATER DISTRUIBUTION 21560,000 MUNICIPAL LABORATORY 11,000 70TAL 1988 2,906,000 FY Ending 1989 LATER PRODUCTION 7,310,000 WATER DISTRUIBUTICH 21361,000 MUNICIPAL LABORATORY Q,700 TOTAL 1969 91739,700 fY Ending 1490 WATER PPODUC1L1N 8,628,000 UA1ER DI$TRUI2if1IO1 2,447,,j0 MUNICIPAL LABORATORY 7,502 • 10TAL 1990 11,0829500 TOTAL FIVE YEAR CIP 32,973,300 riote, 1985 not included r ANN I FIDE 7618 C111 3A "mew Km 01YISION 9gMNY 16ASTEIATER SEINICE • FY Ending 1985 WASTEWATER COLLECTION 11231,776 "DATER TREAY*ff 3860511 IANICFAL LA110RATWY 54601 MISCELLANEOUS 37,500 70TAL 1985E 11661,376 FY Ending 1986 WASTV ATER COLLECTION 11794,000 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 456,000 MUiiCFAL LABORATORY 20,300 TOTAL 1986 20270,301 FY Ending 1987 WASTSWATER COLLECTION 10304,000 14ASTET44TER 7READG7 161,009 MLNICFAL LABORATORY 461900 TOTAL 1987 10511 no FY Ending 1988 IWAST1111ATEl COLLECTION 1,169,OD0 4ASTEWTER :'EATMW 103,200 MLM CPAL LAKRAT M 49,000 TOTAL 1988 11321,240 FY Ending 1989 UA51EliATER COLLECTION 11300,00D W,S7P ATER TREATMENT 60,900 MLNICFAL LABORATORY 20,300 TOTAL 1989 11380,300 FY jading 1999 1 ASTMIER ;OLLECTION 1,220,OOC l1ASTEuATER TREATMENT 122,000 MX CPAL LASOPW ORY 17,500 • TOTAL 199D 1,3,91500 TOTAL FIVE YEAR C1P 7,913,299 'Niles 1785 not included march 1965 1 CAPITAL ImPNEMMOT PLAN WRTEP L WAS LWATER UTILITY IISCAL YEAR 66 PRO,1 rAT PRWECT 6ClMD CUPNLVF AID - IN W1646EP DESCRIPTION TOTAL rt6D ALVIMIC CONSTRUCTION CPT"" Water Production 86-WP-7 Power Line to Rev Water Puny station 40,000 10,000 0 0 O 116-I0-2 Water Plant Rehabilitation Iphsss 111 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 86-W-1 Water Well Nehabilitation 41,000 0 11,000 0 0 86-WP-8 mobile Pqulpmest 10,000 0 5,000 0 1,000 66-WP-S ReW Water Pump-8 WD 250,000 1S0000 p 0 0 total Water Production 1,111,000 1,290,000 46,000 0 S,000 Water Distribution 86-11-1 ReplacO Puirle Street Waterline 27,000 0 27,000 0 0 66-112 Replace Austin Street Waterline 68,6410 0 N, 000 0 O 46-W-1 Replace eongrese Street Waterline 78,000 0 76,000 O 0 86-11-8 Replace Chdotnut street Waterlls.• 16,000 0 16,000 0 0 66-W-S Replace Daugherty St, WL IPrev Coiling 6t) 51,000 0 $8,000 0 p 86-W-6 Replace Weetwy/fulton to coil Waterline 10,000 0 80,000 0 0 66-W-7 Replace Alley Fulton to colt Waterline 58,000 0 51,000 0 0 66-W-8 Replace A11e Alice to colt 25,000 O 25,000 0 p 66-W-9 Replace toOng(Ollov St. Waterline 16,000 0 18,000 0 0 86-10-10 Rep North Rlaxongreea to Univ. Waterline 111,000 0 161,000 0 0 66-W-11 Oversise Waterline 500,000 500,000 0 0 p 86-:. I2 Miscellaneous Waterline 120,000 120,000 86-10-I1 0 0 p IWrth 1011 Waterline 10,000 10,000 0 0 p 86-W-16 Replace University Dr. Waterline 116,000 O 816,000 0 p K-W-15 Replace minelo Road Waterline 27,000 0 27,000 0 p 86-W-16 Replace tocisley Lane Waterline 9,000 0 9,000 0 p 66-11-17 Replace Preston Place Waterline 18,000 0 14,000 1 0 66-10-18 Water taps, laps, meters 800,000 0 0 400,000 0 66-10-19 motile Equipeent 61,000 0 11,000 0 Ms, 000 s6-10-20 Joyce Lane Waterline 10,000 10,000 0 0 p 66-W-21 Replied Weteellnes/street Programs 200.000 0 206,000 0 0 66-10-22 Replace fire myarant 6 valve 50,000 9 50.000 p 86-11-21 Loop 268-11cRlnney to University Dr. Waterline 100,000 100,000 0 0 p 86-W-28 Denton slate School Waterline 88,000 86,000 0 0 p total water Distribution 1,766,000 1,000,000 1,110,000 800,000 166.000 March ISIS T CAPITAL IMPROVLWIT PLAN WATER 6 WASTLIMTER UTILITY r3SCAL YUR 06 PROJEt7 PR(ULCT "a CURAET AID - 11 "UMBER DESCRIPTU AI TOTAL rum RkVrWUE CONSTRUCT101 brftER wastewater collection B6-S-1 Periace rry/Mlckory to oak Sewrline 1D,DOC 0 10,000 0 0 66-S-2 Replace Oak/Try to Bryan Sawerline 10,000 0 10,000 0 0 66-S-3 Replan Br/an/Oak to scripture Sewerlim 19,000 0 19,000 0 0 86-S-4 Replace rn /oak to scripture Sawrline 31,000 0 31,00(, 0 0 06-S-S oversize S werll,ne 500,000 500,000 0 0 O 06-S-6 Miscellana my 1kwerline 120,000 110,000 0 0 0 66-8-7 Replace A"rllln street Sewerlins 40,000) 0 48,000 0 0 06-S-6 Replace Panhandle 6 Bolivar St. Sawerline 26,000 0 26,000 0 0 66-5-9 Replace University Dr. Sewerlire 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 86-S-10 Forth Bell/Driftwood Sewarline 50,000 $0,000 0 0 0 b6-11-11 Mayhill Road Sewerlins 316,000 116,00A 0 0 0 86-5-12 Sewar tape 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 66-S-13 Mobile Pquileent 54,000 0 34,000 0 56.000 86-5-14 Pecan Creel interceptor Improvement 180,000 160,000 0 0 0 06-S-IS Replace Sewrllnea/Street Program 200,000 0 200,000 O 0 66-S-16 Slipline 33' Pecan Creek Seweriins 300,000 0 300 000 0 0 Tout Wastewater Collection 1,794,000 966,000 2 SO.000 58,0 Wastewater Treatment 46-W-1 8 C 0 A- Lift Station 56,000 56,000 0 0 0 66-W-2 Mobile Equipment 10,000 0 7,000 0 3,000 86-W-3 Aerobic Digester Piping 114ase 111 6.000 0 6,000 0 0 R6-W-4 Innovation 6 Alternate Tech. (1"sa 11) 32,000 0 12,000 0 0 116-WW-S Supplemental Water Storage a Supply 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 E6-W-6 Blower Building Renovation 12,000 O 12,000 0 0 66-WW-7 Plant Energy tffeclency Improvement 60,000 0 60,000 0 0 86-W-8 Methane Gas Utilization System 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 Total Wastewater Treatment 456,000 3S6,W 97,000 0 3,000 Municipal Laborat_r~ 86-11L-1 Lab Improvements 13,000 0 11,000 0 0 86-10 2 Lab equipment 6,000 0 6,000 0 0 86-ML-3 Mobile Equipment 10.000 0 1-0,000 0 0 Total Mualcipal Laboratory 29,000 0 29,000 0 p B6-M/8-3 Wash Pack 50,000 $0,000 0 0 0 T 0 T A L rY 56 Capital Improvements 6,438,000 3,670,000 2,212,000 450,000 Im,000 March 1965 3 CAPITAL IMPP(r"kWT PLAN WATER L WASTEWATER lrrILITY r1SCAL YEAR 67 1'krU EC7 II"m l't-T WIND CUkRVVT AID - IN -NIiMPFR lI St NII-tIM 'NJTAI. FUND kLVEMIE C(MSTRUC`Ti(M Cytlt w,ltrr prrdw t_ir,n b7-YP-I Hew water Plant Engineering (phase 111 200,000 2()0,000 0 0 0 07-WP-2 Waitt Plant RehaLilitatinn Ilhase 111) 2,617,000 2,611,000 0 D 0 Tutal Water Production 2,611,000 2,BI7,000 0 0 O Water Uibtribution 6767W-t oversize Waterline 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 87-W-2 Miscellaneous Waterline 150,000 1S0,000 0 0 O a?-W-1 Loop 288 Watetline - MKaT kailroad North 113,1100 111,000 0 0 O 87-W-4 Water TAPS, Loops, Meters 400,000 0 0 400,000 0 87-Y-S Mobile Equipment 69,000 0 14,000 0 55,000 B7-W-6 HWY 177 Waterline, I-7S to Hobson l.a:re 400,000 400,000 0 0 0 81-W-7 E. M,:Xinney Waterline - Lo1p 268 to Woodrow Lane 255,000 255,000 0 0 O 87-W-8 keplace Fire Hydrant a Valve 50,000 0 $0,000 0 0 87-W-9 Replace Waterllom-s/Street Prugram 200,000 0 200,000 0 O 87-W-10 E. Mclinney Waterline - Lonp 288 to Playbill Rd. 65,000 65,000 0 0 0 61-W-tl F. HWY 180 Nater)ine - tx" 268 to Playbill Rd. 67,000 61,000 0 0 0 Total Water Distrlbutirm 2,265,000 1,546,000 264,000 400,x00 55,000 Wastewater collection 67-S-1 0%. to Sewerline 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 b7-S-2 Miscellaneous Sewerline 120,000 120,000 0 0 0 81.5-1 Sever Taps $0,000 0 0 $0,000 0 8?-S-4 Mobile Equilment 14,000 0 1,000 0 77,000 67-S-5 Pecan Creek Interceptor lmptuvrment 400,000 400,000 0 0 0 101-S-6 Replace Sever Lines/Street Program 200,000 0 200,000 0 0 Total Wastewater collection 1,304,000 1,020,000 207,000 50,000 27,000 Wastewater Treatment 87-1M1+-1 14.bile Equipment 125,000 0 119,000 0 6,000 67-WW-2 lnrw,vation t Jlternatlve Technology 0,000 0 4,000 0 0 117-W-1 clarllle: Durres, Final Clailller Renovation 22,000 0 22,000 0 0 81-W-4 Plant Pen(watinr 10,00r'r 0 10,000 0 0 Total Wastewater Treallbent 161,OWi 0 IS5,000 0 6,005 Municipal lAboratotix 87-ML-1 Lab Improvement 9,0(0 0 9,000 0 0 bl-ML-2 Lab Equipment 6,0(10 0 B,D00 0 0 B7-14L-7 Lab Llpanslon 5~0t,DA 50 000 0 0 0 Total Municipal Iatan story ~ b,7ltb-0 ~_T1OOa T 0 T A L FY 87 Captial Impr(rvcsunt■ 6,614,6b~ 3;(3S;6bD LIT;ijBb iS~,b0t1 /S;c700 March 19b~ 4 CAPITAL )M! irOV "31T PLAN WATER A WASTFWATlR 1rTtLITV FISCAL YFAA 68 t1n ~I IJL7 PACJPtT brwu CVNFILVT AID - IN MUMBL'A DISC1411-T1101 T(AAL FIR4) ALVIVIF. C(*S7 ILULT I Ili 01'Mr 4 Water Product Ion 88-WP-1 lk,bile Equi{Dent 5,!100 0 t 0 S,000 be-WP-2 Wev Water Cleat Fngineerlno Iphase lltl 1201000 32D,000 0 0 0 Total Water Production 125,000 320,000 0 0 S000 Water Distribution b6-W-1 Ovelsire waterline 500,000 500,000 0 0 O B8-W-2 Miscellaneoua Waterline 120,000 120,000 0 D 0 8+1-111-3 Replace Povlet St. Waterline 16,000 0 16,000 0 0 bB-W-1 Acplace Wilshire St. Waterline 1!.900 0 16,000 0 0 80-W-5 Water Tare, Loops, Meters 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 b8-W-6 X.bile VAIUI$tent 18,000 0 0 0 48,000 68-111-7 Bonnie Brae Waterline 250,000 250,000 D 0 O PB-111-8 Replace rite Hydrant s Valve 50,000 0 5(),000 0 0 as-W-9 Loup 288 - Mayhill Waterline 210,000 210,000 0 0 0 88-111-I0 I.a,p 288 University Drive to Sherman Waterline 150,000 750,000 0 0 0 Bb-W-ll Acplace Water)luee/Street Program 200,000 0 200,000 0 0 Total WA or Distribution 2,560,000 1,010,000 262,000 400, 48,000 Wastewater Collection BB-S-I Oversize Seweriine $00,000 S00,000 0 0 0 98-5-2 Miscellaneous Scwerline 120,000 120,000 0 0 0 b8-5-3 Replace Monterrey Sewerllne 2),000 0 23,000 0 0 BB-S-1 Sever Tars 50,000 0 0 50,J00 0 88-S-5 Mobile Equllrent 91,000 0 0 0 41,000 bb-S-6 Parallel Hickory Creek Sewelline 185,0110 les'000 0 0 0 be-S-1 Replace Sewer l tree/Street Program 200,000 0 200,000 0 0 Tutal Wastewater Collection 1,169,000 805,000 12),000 50,000 91,00n Wasteyater Treatment PR-W-1 rlav Equalization Basin I, MotOw 1,000,000 0 0 0 Rb-W-2 Innovative i A:tetrwtire Technology 4, DUO 0 1,000 0 0 68-W-1 tk,bile Equipment I ILA 1 2BL 0 25,000 0 31000 Total Wastewater treatment 1,072,000 i;000ta 29,000 0 1,000 Mon lr l((w_l L+t~[a to ly 88-ML-1 Lab Impruverw nts 1,000 D i,OJO 0 0 bB-ML-2 Lab Equileent 19,000 0 19,000 0 0 NO-ML-3 t.ah Expansion SO,000 0 0 1 0 Total Municipal I.eborat,,ry 7~0,~ ...~r.~~.. '20; . b `-f T 0 T A L i'Y 06 l'apltal 11440vements ,1561004) ((K15,000 33tDZSa ~SD,Om TMIN56 March 1985 S CAPITAL IPU,*OYIlOart' PLAN WATEN 6 WASTLYATEA UTILITY rISCAL TPJ1A 69 PROJECT PROJEXT BOND CURILLVI AID - IN NUMBEP DESCRIPTRIN TOTAL rUMD, AVENUE CONSTRUCTitu OTYE7t Water Production 89LP-1 New Water Plant Construction (Phase till 7,360,000 7,360,000 0 0 0 89-W-2 tk~blle Equipment 10,000 0 81000 0 2,000 Total Water Production 7,170,000 7,170,000 8,000 0 200P) Water Distribution 89-W-1 Overslts waterline 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 89-W-2 Miscellaneous New Waterline 120,000 120,000 0 0 0 69-W-1 Water Taps, Loops, Meters 500,000 0 0 500,000 0 69-W-6 Mrblla tquipment - Water Distribution 161,000 0 22,000 0 119,000 89-W-5 Mobile rqulpment - Meter Division 12,000 0 7,000 0 25,000 89-W-6 S. Bonnie Brae Waterline 92,000 92,000 0 0 0 09-W-7 Airport Perimeter Waterline 690,000 690,000 p 0 0 89x•8 E. University Drive Waterline 66,000 66,000 4 0 0 89-W-9 Repls:e Waterlines/Siteet Program 200,000 0 200,000 0 0 89-11-10 Underwood Road Waterline IS0,000 :50,000 0 0 0 69-11-11 Replace rite Mydranl a Valve so 000 0 50,000 0 0 Total Water Distribution 211,618,000 279,000 500,000 161,000 Waste Water Collection 89-5-1 Oversize Sewerline $00,000 500,000 0 0 0 89-S-2 Miscellaneous Sewerllne 50,000 S0,000 C 0 0 89-S-1 Sewer Tapw $0,000 0 0 50,000 0 R9-S-6 Mobile E ICW!,t 67,407 0 16,000 O 0, 000 B9-5-5 North Bonnie Brae Scwerlinc 26; 000 261,000 0 O 0 89-S-6 Replace Johnson Street Severline FS,CO0 0 11,000 0 0 89-S-7 Underwood Road Sewerline 110,010 110,000 0 0 0 69-5.8 Replace Severn r/Street Program 200,000 0 200,000 _ 0 0 Total Waste Water -oltectiun 1,100,0(0 963,000 758,000 50,000 V11,400 Waste Water Treatment 89-WW-1 tnnovatlon 6 Alternative Technology So, roof) 0 50,000 0 0 89-W-2 Plant Arnovation 10,wn 0 10,000 0 p T tal Waste Water Treatment bO,Opp 60,000 0 b Municipal LdIA~ratcry B9-201.1 Lab Equipment 11,000 0 17,000 U 0 89-ML-2 IWLile kyulterent 12,000 0 0 0 111000 Total Municipal I.boratory 29,000 0 17,000 W~ 0 tl•000 T 0 1 A L I'T 89 Cal,ital Impruvroents 3T,TY67M t March 1985 6 CAPITAL IMPR(WLVtLVT PLAN WATEit L WASTmAT[R UTILITY FISCAL YEAR 90 YRO.b Ex'T FROJF/T BOWO CURRM AID - 1M NUMBER OE51CR1Ml(W TOTAL FUND PLMISE COMSTIK"1 ee orb" tenter Production W-WP-1 Mew water Plant lphase 1V) 6,613,000 8,611,000 0 0 0 9o-WP-2 Mobile equipment 15.000 O 10,000 O ` Total Mater Production 8,628,000 8,611,D00 10,000 0 , Water Distribution 90-W-1 Overstre Waterline 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 90-W-2 Miscellaneous Waterline 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 90-W•1 Water tape, Loops i Meters 500,000 0 0 500.000 0 90-W-4 Mobile equipments 300,000 0 100,000 0 200,000 90-W-5 HWY 77 Waterline 122,000 122,000 0 0 0 90-M-6 1-15 M. Waterline 27S,000 275,000 0 0 0 90-W-7 L00p 288 - MY 72 Waterline 350,000 150,000 0 0 0 90-11-8 Replace Waterlines/Street Program _ 200,000 0 200,-000 0 0 Total Water Distribution 2,117,091 1,167,000 300,000 S00,000 W-.000 Wastewater Collection 90-5-1 Over+ite Sewerilno 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 y0-S-2 Miscellaneous Sewetllne 120,000 120.000 0 0 0 90-S-3 sewer laps 50,000 0 0 $0,000 0 90-S-1 "its Equipment 100,000 0 10,000 0 60,000 90-S-5 Cooper Creek Parallel Sevcrline 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 90-5-6 Replace Sewerlines/Stfeet Program 200, 000 0 200,000 0 0 Total Wastewater Collection 1220.000 810,000 210,000 50,000 W500 Wastewater Treatment 90-W-1 labile equtpsw•nt 10,000 0 7,000 0 x.000 90-W-2 Innovative a Alternative Technology 12,000 0 11,000 0 0 90-W-3 Plant Renovati(u, 100,000 0 lOJ,000 0 O Total Waatevater treatment 122,000 0 119,000 O 3,000 Municipal LaboraIory 90-m,-1 Lab equipment s Improvement O_U0~ 0 25 000 0 0 Total Municipal Laboratory 75,000 0 2 0 $ , T 0 T A I. FY 90 Capital 1mprOvementr, 12,112,OOt1 10,910,000 691,000 550,000 ,68,000 1 0 1 A L fY 06-90 Capital Improvements 11,770,000 13,759,000 1,725,000 2,I50,D00 CA,o0t,