HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-01-1985
Act
jocio
~ ~ lgBs'
77 7 7 t r}r,,l it plc' .I f'1`
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CIT1 COUNCIL
October 1, 19^5
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 1, 1985, at 6:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
6:00 p.m.
1. Oiscussion of proposed Public Utilities 3oard
self-evaluation study of the utility system.
Executive Session:
A. legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e) , Art. 6252-17
V. ,T,S.
8. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 0252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 62S2-17 V.A.T.S.
1). Board Apppointments Utdder Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 Y.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the Git1 of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 1, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accurdance with the Su'aff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Urders:
listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
ayment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
ac.k-u p information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
4,A, 4.60 4.0. This listi,ig is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ordinance.
1. Bid 19445 - McKenna Park high service
-limp station
2. Bid 0 9493 - U.S. Highway 380 sanitary
sower vain '
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Meeting of October 1, 1985
Page Two
3. Bid # 9509 - Madul.r furniture
4. Bid g 9510 - Hobson Lane - U.S. 377 water
main
S. 'iid 1 9513 - Repair of two 1,0000000
gallon water tanks
6. B:d 1 9519 - Transformers
7. Bid r 9522 - Wire and cable
8. Bid 19532 - Ambulance
9. Purchase Order 1 70098 to Boyd Excavation in
the amount of $25,000.00
10. Purchase Order # 70099 to Boyd Excavation in
the amount of $21,125.00
B. Plats and Replatsc
1. Approval of preliminary and final re plats of
the Fry Addition, Lot 11R, Block 5. (The
Planning and Zoning Comi,iission recommends
approval.)
2. Approval of preliminary and iual replats of
the Paul Hamilton Addition, Lot 4B0 Block
A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary plat of the
Summerwind Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of general development plan of the
Ridgeway Meadows Addition, Phase 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission reccmmends
approval.)
5. Approval of preliminary replat of the
Summitt Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
6. Approval of preliminary replat of the Sun
Valley Addition, Lot 14, Block A. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
i
7 NV _VOZT~ 7'T n t :J, q~ yn ;
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Meeting of October 1, 1985
Page Three
7. Approval of preliminary and final replats of
the lasley Mall Subdivision, Lot 1R, Block
A. f1he Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
C. Tax Refund:
1. Consider approval of a tax refund to First
Texas Savings Association in the amount of
$611.46
D. Final Payments;
1. Consider approval of final payment to
Albenesius Construction in the amount of
$14,163.30 for the Woodrow Lane sewer line,
CIP Project 85-S-9,
2. Consider approval of final payment to Red
River Construction in the amount of $42,515
for the high service JAimp 15 installation,
CIP Project 8S-WP-6.
E. Sale of Equipment:
1. Consider approval of sale of transformer to
Ohio Transformer Corporotior;, Louisville,
Ohio for the price of $20,000.
i
2. Consider approval of the request of Kendall Hall and
tae Sigma Nu pledge class to paint eagles on the
streets on the North Texas State University campus
during Homecoming.
3. Public Hearings:
A. Petition of James and Marguerite Stativer
requesting a variance of Articles 4.07 and 4.08
of the City of Denton Subdivision and Land
Develops.,.nt Regulations which require that water
and sewer lines be sufficient for domestic use
and conform with the master plans for the city.
The tract is 0.427 acres and located at the
southwest corner of Crescent and Bolivar
Streets. The tract is rescribed as Lots i and 2,
Block 1, of the Stauver Addition and shown in the
BBB 8 CRR Company Survey, Abstract No. 185. The
property is toned (2F) two-family (V-24). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial.)
B. Petition of hlber: Hughes requesting variances of
the following articles of the City of Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations:
Y. . iF 9 ~ 7t r f-r , t o..'l"T.-.Fi`~4.~' '-!a '"*T'~ ~ rr yry c...; .vy--7•~r,,r.;r-rL.~,1• r
r !o'.
ri
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Meeting of October It 1985
Page Four
1) Article 4.03 - concerning ri-sht-of-way and
street paving standards;
2) Article 4.07 - concerning mi;ttmum waterline
size and minimum fire hydrant spacing;
3) Article 4.10 - concerning criteria for
permitting individual septic tank!,;
4) Article 4.1S - concerning drainage standards
and requirements.
The property is located east of Wildcat Road, west of
Rockhill Road, and south of FN 428. The property is
furchar described as a 78.6 acre tract in the C. B.
Emmons Survey, Abstract 403. (The Planning and 2oninp
Commission recommends denial.)
4. Ordinances:
I
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for tlio purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing
for an effective dote.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements;
providing for the expenditure of funds therefore;
and providinf for an effective date.
C. Consider a~optiori of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergoncy purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids; and providing for an effective
date.
U. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 115 acres of land
being part of the J. West Surrey, Abstract 1331,
and beginning approximately 5,000 feet north of
U.S. Highway 380 East an, west of Rockhtll Road
(A-22).
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan instituting annexati)n proceedings for
appproximately 160 acres being part of the BBB
CRR Survey Abstract 142, and located north of
1173, south of Barthold Road, west, of 1-35N, and
east of Hasch Branch Road an: the GCBSF Railroad
(A-24). (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
r.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Mooting of October 10 1985
Page Five
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan instituting annexation proceedings for
approximately 117.5 acres lying in and being part
of the B. Merchant Survey, Abstract 0800, the C.
Chacon Survey, Abstract 0298, and the S. Venter
Survey, Abstract 01315, and beginning at the
southwest corner of 01 2181 and Hickory Creek
Road (A-27). (The Planning and Zoning
Co,imission recommenIs approval.)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
petition of the City of Denton for annexation of
approximately 196.97 acres being part of the I.
Coy Survey, Abstract 212, J, Ayers Survey,
Abstract 20 k:: Burleson Survey, Abstract 93, B.
Burleson Survey, Abstract 249, and the R. Johnson
Survey, Abstract 666. A continuation of, the
existing Denton city limit line from a point
beginning appruximatel/ 900 feet south of Ganzer
Road to a }point approximately 2,600 feet north of
Rector Road (.Approximately 3 1/2 miles) is
proposed (A-16).
11, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
petition of Shaul C. Baruch for voluntary
annexation of approximately 92.80 acres beginning
approximatelY 500 feet north of Highway 77 and
approximately I,OSO feet east of 1-35N (A-28).
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
petition of Mel R. Lacquemont £or voluntary
annexation of approximately 5S acres being part
of the T. Toby Survey, Abstract 1288, and
beginning adjacent and west of kM 2154
approximately 3,000 feet north of Hercules Lane
(A-19) .
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
vacating certain utility easements.
K. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the abandonment of a drainage easement with th.-
City and authorizing the Mayor to execute a
quitclaim deed conveying all right, title, and
interest of the City in said easement to the
owner of the tract of land conveyed by said
easement,
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Meeting of October 1, 1985
Page Six
L. Consider adoption of an ordinance re pea l;ngg
Paragraph B of Article 21 of Appendix B-Zoning ,)f
the Code of Ordinance; of the City of Denton
relating to the approval by the City Council of
plats of subdivisions within an area where
annexation proceedings are pending. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
M. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Appendix A - Denton Development Code of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas to
provide fcr the imposition of fees for submitting
petitions for voluntary annexations. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
N. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
contract between the City of Denton and C. L.
Littl^field for professional consulcin.q services
regarding a management evaluation study for the
Utility Department of LhP City of Denton.) (The
Public Utilities BoarJ recommends approval.
5. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution nominating Yr.
Raymond Pitts as a member of the Board of
Directors cf the County Wide Appraisal District
for Denton County.
b. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to make payment to Lone Star Gas
Company for eligible costs for relocation if
itility facilities resulting from acquisition of
right-of-way fcr Loop H8.
C. Consider approval of a resolution requesting the
State Highway Commission to authorize the
construction of a ramp on 1H-354, southbound near
Victor Equipment Company.
6. Consider approval of final participation cost for a
water line and sewer line oversize agreement - Meadows
Mobile Home Park. (The Public Utilities Hoard
recommends approval.)
7. Consider approval of appointment of CT of Denton
members to the Plow Memorial Ilospital Board of
Directors.
8. Official Action on Executive Session items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real 4it3te
oar p
. oar pointments
1`777-77
$
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Meeting of October 1, 190'
Page Seven
9. New business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
10. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
6. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A. 1'. S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1985 at o' clock
M.) P. M.
CITY SECRETAR)
1937C
October 1, 1985
1 I D lI
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
O Study Session
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT:
DISCUSS PROPOSED UTILITY BOARD SELF BYALUATION STUDY OF THE
UTILITY SYSTEM.
RECOMMENDATION
The Fublic Utilities Board, at their September 18, 1985,
meeting, recommended appro,,a1 of, subject management
evaluation study.
SUMA ARY/BACKGROUND
Attached is the recommended management evaluation contract
between the City of Denton ai,d Dr. C. L. Littlefield. Dr.
Littlefield will be responsible for assisting the Public
Utilities Board and Staff in an evaluation of the Utility
Department and General Government support services to the
Utility. This evaluation should help to improve the
management of the Utility and City and will provide the
foundation information that will be necessary for the
Charter required management study uhich is planned to be
conducted in 1987 or 1988.
Dr. Littlefield will coordinate the efforts of any
additional specialists that may be required in this
effort. He will also compile the information and prepare a
final report. The City will provide typing and report
printing and report assembly services. The contract with
Dr. Littlefield is for $18,090 professional Services and
expenses. Completion of the project is nine (9)
months,
i
It is anticipated that S04 of the study will cover inteinai
reviews of the Utility Department such as organizational
structure, planning controls, communications, reporting
,
safety, equipment utilization, operational practices,
efficiences, public relations, Council/Board/staff liaison
and relations, etc.
The remaining 504 of the study vill cover support services
that are provided by General Government such as finance,
accounting, cost accounting, customer service, personnel,
data processing, energy management, engineering,
inspections, right-of-way acquisition, purchasing,
warehousing, vehicle maintenance,etc.
390SU:6
y
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
All City of Denton Departments, citistns.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Dr. Littlefield 200000
4 specialists 8 $3,000 each 129000
Misc. Secretarial Support $ 2,000
Staff Time not determinable
Estimated Total $34,000
Source of funds:
Electric/Water/Sewer Adm. Service Budget
1985 Budget 250000
1986 Budget 1250000
Any additional funds required would be transferred from
amounts budgeted for Power Supply Study, Transmission
Engineering Studies, or Innovative Energy Management
Program.
Res ally submitted
e
Actin a ager
R. F. Nelson
Director of Utilities
HHIBIT I Proposed Contract
it 8/21/85- PUB Agenda item on Mgmt Study
III Legal Opinion
IV Minutes of PUB Meetings "Actions to Date"
V ordinance
3905U:7
r
7777M 77 1
LEGMEMOREAPNDUM T
Debra Adaml Drayovitch, City Attorney
Joe D. morris, Aaslstant C1ty Attorney
Robert B. Bunter, Assistant City Attorney
TO: R. E.. Nelson, Dire^te r of Utilities
FROM: Debra A. Drayovi.tch, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Management Survey of Utilities
DATE: June 3, 1985
In accordance with your re uest of May 21, 19859 I have reviewed
Article 12, Section 12.08(f~ of the Home Rule Charter of the City
of Denton with respect to the requirement of a management study.
The requiremant of the Charter is quite clearly stated: a general
management survey (is] to be made of all utilities under the
jurisdiction of the board by a competent management consulting or
industrial engineering firm. Because of this language, I do not
feel that the Public ~ltilities Board can direct the study and meet
Cie requirements of the Charter provision. I do believe that the
staff and the members of the Public Utilities Board can legally
take an active role in participating in the study. It may also be
possible to utilfze different expert consultants for different
areas of the management study but it should be noted that it ib
questionable as to whether this will satisfy the requirements of
the Charter.
Should you have any questions relative to this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
bhlo- ) DEBRA A. DRAYOVT:C
DAD-.Js
xc: G. Chris Hartung
Mayor 6 Nemberf of the City Council
e August 21, 1985
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AGENDA ITEEI EXHIBIT II
TO: CHAIRdAN AND A EM BERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
FROA., R.E. Nelson, Director of Utilities
SU5JECi :
DISCUSS AND CONSIDER AANAGEMENT STUDY.
RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND
The Public Utilities board has discussed Jeveral approaches
to conducting a Management Study and have generally
indicated an interest in employing a Aanagement Professor
to coordinate the Study. Attached is b sample contract for
such services, Also included herewith is a general scope
of work and minutes of previous Public Utilities board
discussions on the Aanagement Study.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
• Denton Municipal Utilities, citizens, City of Denton.
FISCAL l1PACT
Not determinable at this time.
Prepared by: Respectfully submitted,
Robert Nelson R.L. Nelson, P.E.
Director of Utilities Director of Utilities
Approved:
R.E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
Exhibit I Paper by John Thompson, June 17, 1985
II Questionnaire by John Thompson prepared April 29, 1985
III Minutes PUB :Meetings
IV Contract for Management Study
Attachment I Scope of Services, Pnase I through %Ill
38S9U
• SUGGESi'EU AETH00S FOR CONDUCTING A JANAMENT SELF-EVALUATION
In lignt of the City Attorney's opinion at our last meeting and the
fact that the formal management audit has been postponed, I suggest
that Me undertake a comprehensive management self-evaluation study
to ensure that we are following the best possible management
practice in 'the Denton utilities. Such an evaluation should help us
evaluate the adequacy, efficiency, and effectiveness of utility
management and operations, and should help identify areas where we
could Improve. It should also assist Los in preparing to contract
for a management audit in the future.
Steps to Prepare for Study
I suggest that we employ a management ex
universities to assist us with the study andtto roe jai overall
coordinator of the study. This consultant should assist us in
designing the study. Then he should consult with the taantgenent
staff and then prepare self-evaluation questionnaires on various
aspects of the utilities management. The staff would be involved to
answering the evaluations which would serve as the basis for
board/staff study sessions. At these meetings we would first look
at what we are presently doing; hear from the consultant his view
of what the best management practices call for, and finally we would
discuss alternative actions which may be called for.
I believe that we might reasonably hold one such study session every
six weeks over the next nine months or a total of six study
sessions. We will need to talk with the managem^nt consultant about
areas or topics to be considered, but I suggest that we begin wtih a
session considering the recommendations of earlier management
audits. What was proposed? What have we done to meet the
recommendations? Do we need to do anything further?
The remaining five sessions might follow the topics listed in nv
questions submitted to the Board on April 29, 198S. For insrance'.
we could first consider how well we manage ideas, planning and
guidance of the utility. The question I raised in the memo iLgnt
help us in planning such a program.
A third program would consider how well we manage tnings--
operations of physical plant and equipment. Again the question on
my earlier memo might help in planning such a program.
The fourth program would consider managing people, that is the
beliavioral aspects of management. Here we might survey
employee-management attitudes; consider pay scales in other
utilities; as well as looking at the management styles used in
motivating and communicating with employees.
r s Miff.
.
Page 2
A fifth program would look at managing in the
i political-inter-organizations environment. We could look at the
city-utility relationships; the utility-TM PA relationships; The
utility-ci,oizens-relationship.
The sixth and final program could compare Denton's utility witi,
other comparable utilities.
Summary
As I see the self evaluation study, there would be self evaluation
questionnaires prepared by and evaluated by a management expert.
Aanagement staff would be directly involved in evaluating what we
are presently doing. At joint staff/board study sessions, we would
compare what we are doing against the State of the art management
practices. There would be a Iota: of six such study meetings over a
nine month period. The meetings would be as follows:
1. Consideration of the affect of earlier management
audit recommendations.
2. Managing ideas, planning, and guidance of the utility.
3. Managing things-operations of physical plait and
equipment.
. 4. Aanaging people - behavioral aspects of management.
I
5, Managing in the political Inter organizational
environment.
i
6. Comparisons of Denton's utilities with other
comparable utilities.
A copy of the suggested questions for management audit. April 29,
1985 is attached.
John Thompson
Public Utilities Board Member
June 27, 1985
S753U:1.2
I
SUGGESTED QUESTIONS FOR t.IANAGEMENT AUDIT
(submitted by John Thompson, Public Utilities Board Member)
April 29, 1985
1. A ANAGING IDEAS, PLANNING & GUIDANCE OF UTILITY
A. Is the Utility organized in such a way as to effectively
perform its tasks?
1. Could it be improved?
2. Are work teams well organized?
3. Are supervisors performing effectively?
B. Regarding the Management Information System, does the
Utility Management Team have adequate data for decision
making?
1. For foreforecdsting and evaluating outcomes from the
the administrative process?
2. Could it be improved? How?
3. Does the system prol;ide best/worst scenarios, how to
respond to a drop in revenues and/or increase in
operating expenses (use in gas or oil pricing)
C. Does needed information flow effectively !n the utility's
communication network?
1. How could communications be improved?
2. Does the communication system work downward or upward?
3. Is there a feedback process?
U. Is the managerial planning system adequate?
1. Are work assignments well-planned an conceived and
fully implemented?
2. Now are the tasks and objectives, once completed
evaluated?
3. Once evaluated, how are recommendations (changes)
• implemented?
3b24U
;t f
E. Are evaluation studies conducted to insure that all
programs are as effective as possible?
1. How can the evaluation program be improved?
2. In employee evaluation (performance evaluations) -are
they fair to everyone or are they generalized?
3. Are there any training programs to assist those
employees that had low performance evaluations or
reward those with high performance evaluations ratner
than dollars alone?
F. Do we have written procedures, rules and regulations for
administrating various po:ici~s?
LI, i"ANAGING THINGS-OPERATION OF PHISICAL PLANT AND EQUIPIM ENT
A. Is the financial management system organized and optrated
S as effectively and efficiently as possible?
1. Do revenues from income and bonds compare favorably
with comparable utilities?
2. How does our operating budget process compare with
most successful utilities?
a. Does it need to be modified?
3. How does our CIP budget process compare with most
successful utilities'
a. Does it need to .e modified?
d. Evaluate the Utilities' treasury fun:tions, and the
various financial reports which are made.
a. How can this aspect be improved?
b. Are idle funds properly invested?
C. Are the investments safe? (i.e., city of Beaumont)
3020:2
• S. Does the City need a capital recovery fee for
financial support to pay for new capital costs in
Water/Wastewater Plants and oversize lines?
a. What are other cities doing?
6. Evaluate the materials management program.
1. Does the utility's purchasing program insure that we
receive the best product for the least cost?
a. How can this be improved?
2. Does the inspection and testing program used by the
Utility adequately insure that materials and equipment
purchased are of the quality called for?
3. Does the program for storage of materials and
equipment safe and eft:c!ently managed?
a. Are inventory controls adequate?
4. Is there proper control over the utilization of
materials and equipment?
5. Does the utility have an aduequate risk management
program that covers all possibilities of loss at the
best cost possible?
a. Are collections from insurance companies for
losses promptly made?
b. How are current insurance coverage ant: practices
evaluated and updated?
111. MANAGING PEUPLE•BEHAVIORA:. ASPE(JS OF.JANAGEAENT
A. Evaluate the leadership styles of management staff and the
organizational climate for creativity,
1. Is there an openness for communications?
2. How can we improve in this area?
B. Are employees ind staff highly motivated in their work'?
1. What additional steps need to be made to motivate
employees?
2. Evaluate personnel system.
~624U:3
•
IV. MANAGING POLITICS-POLITICAL RELATIONS OF CITY WITH CITY AND
CITIZENRY
A. How does Utility's contribution to General Government
compare with that of other municipal utilities?
B. Evaluate Utility's public relations environment and
programs.
V. COMPARE DENTON'S UTILITY WITH OTHER COMPARABLE UTILITIES.
i
3614U:4
e. i. xr 'a4 .
June 19, 198S
EXHIBIT
0 CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD III
rf ~
FROM R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities '
SUBJECT:
Receive City Attorney legal 0 inlon Regarding Conducting c
Management Study by Public Utiiity Board with In-House Assistance.
RECOMMENDATION:
None at this time.
SUMAARY: '
At the May 1S, 1985, Public Utilities board meeting, the Boat
discussed a possible alternative method to conduct a managemen
study, rather than hiring a managemei.c consu.ting firs. Thi
alternative included acquiring the service of several differen
parties who would be authorities in selected areas of management a
work closely with the Board and staff to provide a management revs
and recommendations. Some question developed regarding whether su
alternative approach would meat he chart,.r provision for t
management study. Attached herewith is the City Attorney's opini
• regarding this question.
Also included with this agenda packet is the 1965 Management Stud
the 1978 Management Study of the Electric Divisions and the '9,
Management Study of the Water/Wastewater sys am.
BACKGROUND:
Not applicable.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Department of Utilities, Public Utilities Board, engineering firms.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
Preep,7red Eby:, Respectfully, Submitted,
ZA &.r/e
N-I` P-
Director of Utilities Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I City Attorney Legal Opinion
II Previous Management Studies
37U3U:41
1
e'rWIEN OF PROPOSED +EANAGWNT STUDY EXHIBIT IV
BY PUDLIC UTILITIES BARD
Actions to Date
February 6, 198S
13. CONSIDER UTILITY MANAGEMENT STUDY
The Board had requested this item be placed on the agenda
to discuss utilities organisation issues. The Board has
also requested a list of management consultants who
regularly engage in organization management studies.
EXHIBIT is a list of such firms attached to the agenda
item.
Mr. Nelson spoke to suggested that the list t of consultants regarding nno means issue
toabe'
considered comprehensive but does include companies which
staff was somewhat familiar with and could recommend.
The Board discussed various considerations that they would
desire. The Board would like to request a brochure frou
each of a selected group of consultants to inform them of
the type of services available. The group selected by the
Board with the ability to deal with utilities and to cover
several geographical areaat Touche Ross of Dallas, Ernst
and Whinney of Fort Worth* Gilbert Commonweath of
• Pennsylvania, Barry and Associates of California. The
Board requested that staff write each of the firms and
request the list of services, a brochure, and list of
clients for whom they have done a study recently. The
staff will then do a follow up and contact the list of
clients to see what services were provided, the scope of
the study, and their satisfaction.
No other a r ion was taken. The Board anticipates reviewing
this topic is soon as the information becomes available.
Aarcn 27, 1985
9. CONSIDER ENGINEERS' 3ROCHURES AND INFUICIATION FOR DEVELONENT
_-N r n THE 17T--U=IT bb: aney
requested written reports from the various conipanies- Nelson
recommended that two management consulting firms'
representatives lake formal presentations at the April
meeting. Herring confirmed the suggestion and further
recommended Th adore carry Associates and Touche Ross. In
addition, Herring sli;gested that a sub-committee make out a
list of questions ar the companies. Laney suggested that
these representatives be present at our next regular meeting,
April 24, 1985. Volunteers for the sub-committee are Laney,
Coomes, ind Herring.
3827Us1
• April 10, 198S
This item was not presented to the board at the April meeting,
Way 15, 1985
4. CONSIDER MANAGMEN:' STUDY
Thompson indicated ,nat he was not impressed with either Touche
Ross or Theodore Barry Associates to conduct the management
study. Witat vie want, according to Thompson, is a management
audit that will (1) force us to evaluate our operation in light
of the best management standards possible, and (2) give us a
comprehensive study of our organization. He suggested the
Board itself conduct the audit. He outlined the proposed audit
to include the following guidelines:
1. Create a management study that will include the City
andncOper tingityPersonnel City
and a compareitus 4atogeother
similar utilities.
2. Involve all parties or their representatives who will
be included in the study.
3. Recruit management experts, (approximately six) to
outline issues and questions from their respective
areas of study for the group to ask of itself, the
organization, and utility data base.
4. Have all sectors of Utility Administration answer the
questions outlined from the experts.
S. Have each expert analyze the answers in his area of
expertise and review their findinis with the group.
6. Have one expert or team of experts (ie. Manager if a
major utility) to analyze the
conclusions/recommendations of the six experts, and
conduct a final seminar. The study would be conducted
over a period of about six months; each expert would
be involved for approximately one month in his
respective area of expertise.
Herring praised Thompson's innovative approach to the
management study, but expressed the ccncein that the
study may not satisfy the charter requirements.
Hartung suggested we get an opinion from Legal
regarding this issue.
38VU:2
y .t ~ ~ .v" tin
Coomes expressad the concern that the study must have
public and City Council credibility. Laney agreed.
Thompson indicated that we would recruit experts in each
are which would give credibility to the study. Laney
reminded the Board that the City Charter was d, Laney ianlso
a
simillar manner and is considered to be a credible and
outstanding document.
Herring suggested that vie obtain a Legal ruling on the
proposed plan and proceed from that decision. Laney
suested Thomson meantimes Hering outlinethathe
thep proposed program. In the
and viewed prior to the next meeting. Thompson magreed ato
do so.
Herring feels we will deed a full time person to work for
six months on this project. Boyd suggested we include
Utility personnel and input from the Board.
Herring made a motion to postpone action on item 14 until
the next scheduled meeting, June 19th at 7:30 p.m. Boyd
seconded the motion. All ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
June 19_i1985
7. RECEIVE CITY ATTORNEY LEGAL OPINION REGARDING CONDUCTING OF
• L
ASSISTAriCE. + -
Urayovitch rendered a legal decision regarding this item.
She indicated that a management study must be conducted by
couldgbeea rconsultant taor each utilitytif desiredears. There
Laney suggested the Board do a study to regulate policy
development. Thompson recommended the Board consider a
project of self evaluation In order to direct the ten (10)
year audit.
Boyd agreed, however, indicated teat the Staff is concerned
about the amount of time needed for such a self-evaluation
project. Laney felt that the only in-house assistance
needed would be primarily secretarial it, nature. Thompson
indicated there would also be meetings, and followup by the
Staff.
Herring suggested Thompson develop his plan prior to the
next meeting. Boyd volunteered to provide secretarial
assistance.
. 3827U:3
.fu1Y3985
3. DISCUSS AND CONSIDERJ,Jp 9ANAGNENT 5TUD1 8Y PUBLIC
Coomes re ,ted the Board to delay this item until
'ue arriva~ of Laney. the Board agreed,
Thompson requested suggestions From the Board and
staff prior to proceeding to the next agenda item.
Coomes suggested the following
in number five (5) under two question to be placed
oes the City
need some kind of capital recover y DIn ord for
financial management to be solid? What areerother
cities doing in this matter?"
Nelson indicated that Keith Reed of Touche Ross
offered to be the coordinating entity for this
project. Touche Ross would employ the
necessary to assist the Board in whatever ca people
pacify.
Thompson agreed that the Board would naed someone in
this capacity.
O Coomes posed a question regarding the expense of
conducting
two studies, one for the Board and one to meet the
City Charter requirement.
Nelson, indicated that the self evaluating study
incorporating the ,
possibly fulfill the Charter requirement; however,ula
legal opinion would be needed,
Nelson cited several advantages to utilizing a
coordinating
body. The amount of staff time that will be involved
for this project would be considerable without the
coordinating
body to assist. In addition, the Board could limit
the cost of the project as well as eliminate the fees
involved in contracting individual coordinarors. The
latter would also prolong the self-evaluation Process.
Boyd indicated a deli a to look at Denton as a
regional body in the study. Thompson indicated that
it can be considered.
3827U;4
M 1W
Thompson suggested the following question for I as Ft
"Do we have written formulated rules and regulations?
Are they adequate and fair?"
Thompson indicated a desire to begin the project in
August a.-,a requested suggestions from the Board for
the nP:,t meeting.
July 17L 1985
8. DISCUSS AND CONSIDER MANAGEMENT STUDY.
Laney expressed concern regarding the article in the Denton
Record Chronicle which indicated that he ro
self-evaluating study could meet the charter requirements
if coordinated by a consultant firm, Laney prefers that
the self-evaluation study preceed the formal management
audit.
Nelson encouraged the Board to move forward on the
management study soon or soon is possible. The utility
staff would recommend a full management audit, rather than
a salt-evaluation study.
Coomes thinks that there is a tremendous advantage to
conducting a self-evaluation study coordinated by a
consultant that would meet the charter requirements. He
indicated that the City would save money and the new City
Manager would have a document to draw upon if changes were
needed.
The board asked John Thompson to check with and invite a
management professor to a special r.atled Board meeting in
tuo week to discuss the proposed management study.
• M INUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIE0 BOARD MEETING
July 31, 196S 7:00 a.m.
Ramada Inn
M WERS PRESENT: Roland Laney, Edward COOmes, Nancy Boyd, John
Thompson, R.E. Nelson, Chris Hartung
STAFF PRESENT: Ernie Tullos, David 4am, Charles Cryan
OTHERS PRESENT: Steve Beeler, Denton Record Chronicle
ABSENT: None
Meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Roland Laney at 7:OS
a, m•
1• C
MEETNG OF ONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES_ BOARD
J 1 , 1985-1
Coomes amended. made a
Thompson seconded to approve the minutes as
carried.
Z• DISCUSS ANI CONSIDER MANAGEMENT STUDY.
• Thompson informed the Board that Dr. Littlefield, a
Management Professor at North Texas State University,
could not be present at the morning meeting due to
recent surgery. Dr. Littlefield will be available for
the regular August Board meeting to discuss the
proposed Management Study.
The Board members discussed the role of the "Study
Coordinator's for the proposed Management Study.
Thompson recommended two primary duties:
1. Provide expert support for each phase of the
study.
a. Advise on available talent in a specific
topic area.
b. Negotiate with propposed study leaders as
to timing of specific topic work sessions
and "on site" work scheduling.
c. Coordinate any document information such
as questionnaires, measurement
instruments, etc.
Organize and compile study achievements.
I
a. Review previous Utility Management Study
documents with particular eaphasis on
recommended a.ztions.
b. Review management documents and studies
of other utilities to develop additional
measurement data.
c. Compile a comprehensive report fron, study
areas including recommended actions or
changes.
After some additional discussions the Board took no
action on the item, The Board indicated that the
staff should begin developing a contract with cost and
specific study elements open for Board recommendation.
3. DISCUSS MASTER SEWER PLAN FOR HICKORY CREEK AREA.
Nelson again informed the Board of the problem of
enforcing current policies with regard to wastewater
A control within the drainage area north and west of the
Lewisville Lake. The overiding emphasis in this
discussion was protection of the Denton water supply
at its intake point west of 13SE at Lewisville Lake.
Coomes made a motion directing staff to work with the
cities within the drainage basin to develop a Regional
Wastewater plan within the area within a set of
guidelines:
1) That the City of Denton and its ratepayers not
bare a disproportionate share of costs;
2) That Denton protect its primary water supply;
3) That planning focus on service to Municipal
Corporations or Public Utility districts; and
4) That all legal concerns be included within
contractractual obligations.
Boyd seconded the motion. Motion carried.
• - IML
NO.
AN URDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON ,',NO
C, L, LITTLEFIELD FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES REGARDING A
MANAGEMENT EVALUATION STUDY FOR THE UTILITY OEPARTMENT OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT
APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the C0 y of Denton desires to undertake a Utility
Management Evaluation Study for tls Utility department of the City
of Denton, Texasi and
WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain professional consulting
services in connection with such at;dy$ and
WHEREASO C. Littlefield to qualified and capable of
performing the services desired by the City, la acceptable to the
City, and is willing to enter into an Agreement with the city to
perfoca such servicesi NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN'NN HEREBY ORDAINSi
SECTION 1.
That the contract between the City of Denton, Texas and C. L. and alonslfconaulti gcssrv ces in connection wilntthereof, for profes.
Management Evaluation study for the Utility Departmentaoftthe City
of Denton is hereby approved and the mayor is hereby authorized to
execute the contract on behalf of the City,
SECTION II.
Tnat the expenditure of funds in the amount of Eignteen
Thousand Dollars (:18,000.00) for compensation and a sum not to
exceed Two Thousand Dollars (62,000.00) for actual expenses is
hereby approved.
SECTION III
That this ordinance shall become effective Immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of
1485.
RICHARD O, STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST
CHARLOTTE A EN, ITY ECRETAR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY; y{~,~ r ~t • J ~y~
IIII
THE STATE OF TEXAS S
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
COUNTY OF DENTON $ DENTON AND C. L. LITTLEFIELD
The City of Denton, Texas, a home rule municipal corpc.ation,
hereafter called "CITY", acting herein by and through its Acting
city manager and C. L. Littlefield, hereafter called "CONSULTANT",
hereby mutually agree as followa:
I.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CITY agrees to employ consultant for the purpose of
coordinating a management study of City's Utility System and its
support service groups which shall be conducted in the following
manners
1. CONSULTANT sha..l work with the Public Utilities Board
and the City's adminijtrative staff in planning the scope of the
management evaluation.
2. CONSULTANT shall conduct anA be responsible for the
implementation of the evaluation by performing the following
services:
(a) Aid the Public Utilities Board in the selection of
specialized management consultants to undertake
specialized aspects of the evaluation.
(b) Consult witn staff regarding administrative
processes ds carried out including organization,
planning, policy formulation ano use, performance,
measurement anea control, employee relations, finan-
cial administration, interdepartmental relations,
staff, Board and Council relations and community
relations.
(c) De•.ermine, with staff and Board, areas that offer
potential for improvement and prioritize these
areas in terms of time and attenti'n.
(d) Devise study approaches toat utilize both inside
talent (Board, staff, other departmental
personnel, Coordinator) and outside specialists,
and implement those that are possible for the
current fiscal year.
3. CONSULTANT shall compile a draft comprehensive report of
all separate ;management studies by June 15, 1986, with final
report due July 15, 1986.
II.
PAYMENT
. CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for the services performed here-
under as ioil.owss
(a) The sum of Eighteen Thousand Dollars ($18,000.00) pay-
able in monthly installments of Three Thousand Dollars
($3,000.00) per month, commencing November, 1985.
(b) A sum nit to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($20000.00)
for out-of-pocket expenses which shall be submitted
monthly. Such out-of-pocket expensen include, but
are not limited to, travel, long disf.ance telephone
c;narges and printing expenses. Said expenses shall.
be suomitted on a monthly basis.
(c) Payments shall be made for services in subsection (a)
no later than the 5th day of the month following and
snail be paid no later than 15 days after submission
of expenses provide] for in subsection (b),
III.
TE%M
The term of this Agreement shall commence upon Octooer 150
1985. CONSULTANT shall complete his services provided hereunder
within nine months from the date of execution of this Agreement.
PAGE 2
0
IV.
TERMINATION
CITY may terminate tnis Agreement upon 30 days written notice
to CONSULTANT. In the event of termination, CITY shall pay
CONSULTANT for full services rendered and expenses incurred to
date of termination and CITY snall receive 311 completed work to
the date o° termination and any work in progress snall also be
delivered to CITY.
V.
MODIFICATIONS
• The provisions of this Agreement constitute the entire Agree-
ment between the parties and supercede all prior communications
and agreements, oral or written, between the parties hereto with
regard to the subject of this contract.
VI.
SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY
It is mutually understood and agreed by and between CI'T'Y and
CONSULTANT that CONSULTANT is an independent CONSULTANT and snall
not be deemed to tie or considerei an employee of the CITY of
Denton, Texas for the purposes of income tax., withholding, social
security taxes, vacation or sick leave benefits, worker's compen-
sation, or any other CITY employee benefit. The CITY shall not
gave supervision and control of CONSULTANT and any employee of
CONSULTANT, and it is expressly understood that CONSULTANT shall
perform the services hereunder at the direction of and to the
PACE 3
satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of Denton or his
designee under this Agreement.
VII.
OTHER CONSULI..NTS
It is hereby understood that CITY shall enter into agreements
with otner individuals, firms ..c corporations to assist in the
performance of the services provided for herein. Such
individuals, firms or corporations shall perform services under
the direction of CONSULTANT and said servli.;es mall be coordinated
I
with CONSULTANT.
VIII.
SOURCE OF FUNDS
All payments to CONSULTANT under this Agreement are to be paid
by the CITY from funds appropriated by the City Council for such
purposes in the Budget of the City of Denton.
/ IX.
CONFIDENTIAL WORK
No reports, information, project evaluation, or any other
documentation developed by, given to, prepared by or assembled by
CONSULTANT under this Agreement that contains confidential infor-
mation belonging to CITY snail be disclosEd or made available to
dny individual or organization by CONSULTANT without the express
prior written approval of .he CITY.
i
PAGE 4
X.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Upon acceptance or approval by CITY, all reports, data and
other documents given to, prepared or Lissembled under this Agree-
ment by CONSULTANT, and any other related documents or items shall
become the sole property of CITY and shall be delivered to CITY.
XI.
INDEMNITY
To the extes:t allowed oy the law of the State of Texas, CON-
SULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and hold CITY whole and harmless
against any and all claims for damages, costs, and expenses to
persons or property that may arise out of, or be occasioned by or
from any negligent act, error or omission of CONSULTANT or any
agent, servant, or employee of CONSULTANT in the execution or
performance of tnia Agreement.
XIr.
RIGHT OF REVIEW
CI'T'Y may review any and all of the services performed by
COP,'SULTANT under this Agreement.
XIII.
INSURANCE
CONSULTANT snall provide, at his own cost and expense,
worker's compensation insurance, liability insurance, and all
• other insurance necessary to protect CONSULTANT in the operation
of CONSULTANT's business.
PAGE 5
XIV.
EiERVICES b SUPPLIES TO BE FURNISHED BY CITY
City agrees to furnish to Contractor the following services;
{a} Typing support through the word Processing Department
and minimal staff assistance to assemble the final
document required herein.
XV.
ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement shall not be assignable in whole or in part
without the written consent of the other party.
. XVI.
VENUE
Venue and jurisdiction of any suit, rignt or cause of action
arising under or in connection with tnis Agreemant Shall be
exclusively in Denton County, Texas.
XVII.
NOTICE
Any notice given by one party to the other in connection with
this Agreement shall be in writing and snail 4e sent by registered
mail, return receipt requested, with postage and registration fees
prepaid:
CITY CONSULTANT
Rick Svenla C. L. Littlefield
Acting City Manager 2703 Brookfield
• 215 East McKinney Venton, Texas 76201
Denton, Texas 76201
PAGE 6
Notices snal, be deemed to have seen received on the date of
receipt as snoxn on the return receipt.
Executed this the day of 1985.
~:ITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
1
BY:
RICK SV'6HLA, ACTING CITY
MANAGER
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRE ATAT RY
CITY OF DL,i, ''"7, TEXAS
APPROVi AS . ' ,AL FORMS
DEBRA Al Ml DRAYvVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY )F JENTON, TEM
BY:
CONSULTANT
BY:
C. L. LIi'TLEFIELO
Tnat is hereUy designated as the
person to administer the provisions of his ayrpe:r,•:~nt.
D+ ~~E FLICK _
.N LA, ACTING Li'1~
MANAG :t
PAGE 7
DAM 10-1-85
CITY COUNCIL MORT FORKAT
TO: Kayor and Kembers of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting, City Kanager
SUBJBCT- APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING PLATS:
1. Preliminary/Final Replats of the Teasley Kell Subdivision,
Lot 1R, Block A
2. Preliminary Reylat of the Sun Valley Addition, Lot 14, Block A
3. Preliminary Replat of the Su=Ltt Addition, Lots 1, 2, Block 1
4. Preliminary Plat of the ItimbrrVigd Addjtl.on,vc_,?,t1.,~h ,
5. Preliminary/Final Replete of the Paul Kaallton Addition, Lot
4-S, Block A
6. Preliminary/ Final Replats of the Fry Addition, Lot 11-R,
Block 5
1• General Development Plan of Ridgeway Meadows, Phase I
Rg1C0l418NDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered these items at its
meeting of September 25, 1985 and voted to recommend approval of
the above listed plate.
BACKGROUND:
PROGRAKS 4 D8PARTMBNTS OR GROUPS AFFBCT64:
FISCAL IKPACT:
AckSve y sub tte :
y: Acting City Kanager
Prepared b
Denise SplVey~-
Urban Planner
Approve
Jiff Meyer
Director of Planning
and Development
1346/4
7.00
CITY COUNCIL
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
M98TINU DATE: October It 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary and final replats of the Fry
Addition, Lot 11-R, Block 5
S" AARY: This tract is 0.51 acres located at the
northeast corner of Anna Street and Sunset
Avenue. This tract is shown in the Robti:t
Beaumont Survey, Abstract 31, Denton, Texas.
The property is zoned general retail (GR), and
office/retail development is anticipated,
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforins to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulatiuns.
The purpose of the replat is to eliminate an
interior lot line and create one large lot,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and find replats
RECOMMENDATION: The Plannini and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ATTACHMENT.' Reduced plat
yua . .Qn ,
Denise S v y
Urban Planner
1342g/6
1
LOT 0 fL.UnJ<f LOT I ICI
1 ';Z` {TA4. !KR C OFFICE P
Q rr~cE t ONE:
w+t
so of
m
aw
NO Mi CMw vl
a ~T II•N, CLOCK S 1t01a
J N"AL *ETA ZONE
it
LUCILLE PEEL
NO ICq LE rLEI
\\~s M
25'91L
t f
- '
UN S[ f AVENUE iqr so epw --~_q~rt drrtw~
I
I,
n.cc5
! 7 I
rH,v'..IF rthn 'atl.. tl'a I ~ r.
FRY ADDITION r ? SZ
LOT II-R, BLOCK S
165 AC. i
M165
j 2
Df.n1 N A1,0141' or Loll II Vol
a tI
Poll t tof V It, elect C
Afar . a1; M1i Ts, rt 76 D RD CT. a
NOBEAT IEAL1AONT ST. A • SI '
LDCNiON N
AP
Col etl Wry d Dula, Tva a
-_O.nu
JETT DEVELOPMENT CO.
MMV
rM Y
LOT p. .0. PL M t
w I
r.ari
1 7130
FIXED, eDIVA1D1 1 AIIOCIAILS, INC.
MwI1M 1 MhIrY
..ll r,nr .an awl qa+a nur Iw1
-'LiR w a ~ f in+r
L IVr'F1
r:Vp ,n Ing
11
/101 CI T 1 0 1
ST/TI or rnu
(Obit Of On,
If ANKi W w ~ ib4 ca 11 t.641, I.,t fr trod ft,t Atetei
Tai,:f Twa. w Mty $13 .1 lit 11 w Para N la, q 11Nh s, Iq
IIf{tIK, rwa41 to felt 7S p•0• h No" 1wa4 of all rw.tr,
•^I 1•V1 we pnitda]/ 4wr111/ u fall.,
I I1101q RC at s sts,1 Pas a ohs sMhrK .ww of "ca IN 71. it
IRT AOO nO,t the IalorMtl" N th .80th rl/ht-•f. f a Ira, IwW sill th
LOT K. @LOCS 1 LOT I a,K tllhtol~ j or 4a St"'t
~tAp TWM' hrtlh NIL th Mat rtlh•..,rf-rl N Kid 4r k1
th KK Its. N "if l4 I1 . two of 110.1 tM 4a Knl s
M IS 71,
•OS'OdO . ISO DOS At the ~ti tMar ,f of / let 111
f1M 1.rt% h htr at 04 11.4" 00 r ..44 6tt 410 tlA 80th Ilnt
o Of mid 1.u 11 tni IT, • , Islam N lim IM W . Kiwi Sb fse 1
Y CNwtr1
R OT 11.8. BLOCK S LOT rf'Id1'ol$"I% 6 dill., st IS rw s rwl 7IS K tit meth
♦f 17, wr w all 1."n 1 .iK r ch 680th ila N ql/ 1N
'a LOT II LOT II
i I a' Li Sw1 10 11 01 slnthis 0D Mws f Ntat eh wstl I1s4 1111183 _ 6f lat. I
I re / 11 16! .{eh this .Nth r7lh'•-r1 s: KII S.4N
= I...w s Ilatw" of 151.0 to" Is nI 7slsl ad 1111"1.1 w
teu1.1.1 1s it& O.SIU atrr if lad.
!I I
Iw tRauat na ALL wn by nine rlcarr,
Txl', 1 4 hsnhr w.N this Plot Ml pt We Ilif h r,1.
/ar•if raplnl a IN II-1 11Kh S• rr/ 1M1ttr to Ih CLIP N
/ 9 r 100 Or ,r, Irtr (well. T64s wl la. Mr.1r 4tlun is the pll It
.K hn"r Ih 11r"t= "f ",r.It$ dM Ilrrq,
SUNSET /VE14UE 1RIST, 90ROr.
Jwr Os,Mr.6.t G
.TATS W Terse
Afsrt r, Ow w4rsywe rtsri r6hlls tv th 1<sts N T1ns w
this 4r prsealir slp,rw Issss o as to be IN
prM ,Asst ssa is b t ib d is t!r fw.plq lMrrN w
sdarl,fpf to r tht M s.NttN Ins BONN to lh Parr" 680
<MIIwRlr1 t7rnls uM.ssN , w Is IN "Witt thin, sNt N.
Ot." .wsr " hw 8.4 K.1 at 6111" this W 41 d
uurl . I< K tM trs . .tut
:16 C.rl n1K ".1rri
AMA? w yRr7Trr'S LDTltlydl
FRY ADDITION "°Ir, n ocpxl, crv lu ti. 1r TNfst nnvn,
LOT 11-R, BLOCK S That f. Slwfsfl h.strn6, Iq t.nrw hull Swwrse, As hn1,
loftier thet 1 rtprN tab 11.1 r/ 4Krlrlr r Kt. 1 w
0.5161 AC, K"r,[6 80"61 of the Ir1 r/ thl th it" Mr ,hw lhhr.K Kn
Bsinl 0 R40111 d LAI II BOA 01--d 80461 at Potosi "prtlna I$ wtw4wi Nth I% INN,
IM d LAI 12. li=d S. Fry
F/eNIOn; NI. IS, pons OROLT,
ROBERT K 911801 RT BY. A- 11 LOCATit I MAP
Coq' laid Cone OI Owal, 7,01" tr w
Tsw tatlKKw Milt
Osaw SwwT" L. 7711
JETT OEVCLOHAERT Co
a '
1MA1lAC w Ll
TIT AMT104
COT II•R, /LOCH
rfu/l, D.Alol 1 AA&MgAru, 110'0
".rrraw....w,
1~n our .ore. tssN isMPa 0[14 .bas
R•T7p
RECEIVES Si f' 1
• 'V C Y I
CITY COUNCIL
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary and final replats of tte Paul
Hamilton, Addition, Lot 4-B, Block A
V MMARY: This tract is 0.63 acres located on the west
side of Cleveland Street, 500 feet south of
Eagle Dr. This tract is show,: in the Alexander
Hill Survey, Abstract 623, Den+:on, Texas. The
property is zoned multi-family (MF-1), and
multi-family developtnenc is anticipated.
City services and facili'cies, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste ere available.
'The plat conforms to thy:, miuimum requirements of
the Denton Suodivisic'n and Land Development
Regulations.
The purpose of the teplat is to eliminate an
interior lot line and create one large lot.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replats
RdCUMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,with t'ze condition that building permits
will not be iss-ied until relief sanitary sewerline
is constructed along Eagle Drive to relieve sewer
capacity bottleneck in this area.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
N1A 4r QA
Denise Spive6+
Urban Planner
1342g/1
! A
Ww/ 'DULLLV lOr~0.af,Y 4 II,!
WIPPA MfO I ~y
YI.r jON[ ~_at j w4~
77 y
us.Id •
L4• . N
Y / . 1 twj
LOT 4R. BLOCK A A
j O.04 AC.
' 1 liV
`Y D. 70NA I
I
LIA 1 ►
1 LOT A
I[ Mr. 1 jON[ ~ y
I I ~ Me
PWLUPPARP,
PC~Lii
PAUL HAMILTON ADDITION
LOT 4R, BLOCK A
0.434 At MI+1 a Rrolal d RN Raw Morransn
Af0wn, LMI 4 AM S. 9160 A;
a
R/CMO11 Ia VO1 344, ►4ADZ
DIN oRoodrel u W D1 CP.Ir~TT, raw
AllrenOn MIII 3utw u7r1T A•613 f131r~ /T~
Cary t/+l C/YIY7 M DAn IoA. TIra1
row ~QIAB[R ~ / •9i IJ
SCQ
N.
lOCA7rpY YV 111
.+i
lAyL Kw%.TON AOp w
LOT AA IILOCA ►
IIILDA, 1--DWA/WAA YWpATL, IIIC.
rwrrr. Twrgrrr
_ r,n ray. ~ln. wN RYrO1 Krq r!W
I III C AI tat
RIn d Toes
COUSf1 OF Khit/1
1a11ILlS, i, $tattle I/tt1 w am 00*1 N s IIKt Of Ib/ as the Call of la.tb N 10 IN
Num/er 1111 lung, ISe1rK1 Seamy 111, Omtb CwK/. Tease, wt Ukq all of Late o
Nt S, ilerl 1, hell Iwlltw "allm 1. [M Cat, of AKn, ee I..w I. gteas 341.
lat• 401, Ned IKee1e N he of CGwtp, s•/ WAS rurg p.rtlnt.-I/ Iryeelm/ w fdleuet
11"ImM.S at a steel pit at 6a twlhawl ww 01 eat/ Led 1, b14 steel Ib hatq w
the ways rllbtrl r,l A Clerked itrrll
I TMKa le.lt ill data., L *Louis, 00 MaWa West a!l t.a myth IIb at wit W 4 e
51154A OVLL[t + la /I,twe f 111.00 1.0 to . Keel pis &I IN .b[bea•t twbl N bll Sat ti
10. "C 06 is I M ft Mt1l OCK 0g7pq
t TNIoo Sato Vlto IM at it" M Lyle 1 .M S t tiHeKe J 110.15 fort et • xeel Ib
VOL 344L p •0/ at K IN lM blLlW ,t tKYI Of q/ Id[
» Tbstr Pont IY N{.'eas 71 u..tee M aKeeds 6.1 Ito am brit it. eel/ tea S e
V If u.MS of 170,10 I at to . fw!•tKh plot at the twtoma earnee K b11 Fat S, b71
N IVSYOeg l»/d IIM .1.1 . IN eeK rf,Mrf'••p ed b(s Cl.wlsM Sir,",
r a 1 Thee, Seas M Nerra II Hart.. 00.K w/e WK VILA 4o, at r[tslsl w/ N eel/
w OC Ctreelw/ Str1K a /Sear..:, of Ip.11 low, to tM P•1❑ •1 lr,u.t" ,M crlr❑f el in all
0.6% Kn1
LO' of ire/.
' I N
/d. Tp PJ1/Wl, My ILL no If 11161 pIlOE4117,
LOT 4R, BLOCK A O
f • 8 IS he t. I, , uAt14 I,. P. b Mfrtr aW this p61 44114 -4 M, the M,rt. NrH be in,erto
I 0.634 AID. 1. W IN t1, 1, hell bahew We 4t mowrU t Oil t1 serr.. a, .M le Mrrh dedicate 1•
Y[39..4 If" I p 1, m It1t1e w l ulr.o lM arena . an/ nt, A. tMr.in.
/~0pI p,I1a0~. LO' C II 3
W Y 1
~~WYY Y~ YYY to I 1
I tm I eat eat u
Ad.
Amer l _ SN'SYOGIl 11/00 /TAn OF TfJlal
hasps ww10 R Before r, IN r,frn11nr1 burp Mile Sae the NK..1 Teeee, M able hl W1.111
l LOT S appeared SlKllr at... Ian to as 10 by too /erba .bee bee Is wtrtllel t• IN
fs"I.J Iwtrwal NI Ktrww r/1p4 to b that he 4N Ked the wb 1.1 W W". MI
A [r,lpnllaa ehafel, "pressed sod I. the eepeett/ .(sled.
Cl,m May 0, h.nl .r/ Sell of ,ffl[, ttie tha III K 1t01.
I
ur1 , e K IN urea eels 44 Cnarlwlw wplew
5911 t 1001 Ct1 TI F 1C I T11
IOW 1LL 411 IT MC4 IIL1EM,
T1V1 1, Awlo,t U,s,tron, bpuu,ed hall, Sunr,tr, A. Mnar wif, thy, 1 pr,sred
t,1, ,b, r1 hKrtptran Not en .noel sad Knrrar bnr/ of rM 4M r/ tll w1♦ 1r,»
plv soc tta nim very Dtar" n ter q rwnlDlee 11 Keaflama aLh LM Irr
7t mpul Ii
me e ii•e:r _
'er
Tx elt tapKVM hll le
9VtAT OF lu,.rlne I.alwr 1111
PAUL HAMILTON ADDITION
LOT 4R, BLOCK A
0.634 ALL
MinO i Py" N IM PNI WlruPpl
A000a, LOS 4 vow So IIa/I A 1
R, twdta in VA, 741, PE 401
DOW Pocar0l DW40 CaMT, Taw
AllmrlOw wit Awrq A • 413
CM A110 Camq of Oman. lot"
0 7A A111- I . 'I bodam
A FOX LOCOTIp1/ + .r
S
t 1 SOT 4L RtIC~
1 / N r) vL1 BTtrs
MILCl. 10*AA01 a A000CIOI , I0
M.r,Iw,eer
oooq~ r~rtw]R tPf, A,t 4arq q,V NM
BOTH
_ r ww`tia .wr w B art T4
CITY COUNCIL
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Summerwind Addition
SUMMARY: This tract is 55 acres located on the north side of East
McKinney 1500 feet east of Audra Lane. This t:zct is
more fully described and shown in the J. Brock Survey,
Abstract 55, Denton, Texas. The property is zoned single
family (SF-7), and residential development is anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary
sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
UL Sv i4
- 4_u "i
Denise Spivey'
Urban Planner
RECEIVED i a 1 85
,t
. S .:..J
> % 1
or
7;'-py* Y( .y. f .rY./ • ' ~ • ~ I~ ~ r ~ i. ail ' ~ I'1.,
1 2 G M 1. A1, wM'• , rte; ~ / •~'..yj J tip.- 1•' I 1 /\t~ ~ I•~1
..1 1 I ra aJr r 001
r - i IFfIrU( MIRY ~.Y.~ jt i
' w• r.
Pobb,
1` f w , w i' r 'I I ' L' 1 1 .l f ' q11 ~f ( 1.
d.' ! / ~•rA 1 • S 5 S+F YC. - u. y 1'. f T . (11j C:
1 } I;
'A A 't Oo
pp M
y 11.1 Al-
y y1 ~~CC
I ` rl rr~l` ~ ~ AiACknA(f V NITV l
I , l - .J .CM EIIM w 1• r- ...r-., . - µ ~ l{.y Ci Y
1 _
'1 . w..- nSLt
J I t .rr'' ♦ 1 fib'.r f 1 r,
«
,~rJrj[11 rr r,1 "rrt TI ~ '1,.` X"-r! ~ ~il r - _ 1 ♦t
I r _ <ti i •J1 C _ \ 1 • ` .~I +'w~v H kn..1 i %y . 1..~ • .~r-a • 1/•* '.''y? a
I
r 1 r •!t` r i' a• . u 1;I~ Jj 'fl t ~.rrMa . \ . I
~t rwwY..yl- 11 •`.~•..,...~Ir/ 1 ~'rI tJ', ~7
P1 ♦ 1 1 ~l, h 1 . - Z r, \1 t r•.. ~If % 1 ry 1• {yI . • J . _
• 1 fl/J ,I~,R ~tl ~ _4 . ♦ '.r-. `~~i~.#`!`•:'~y.; 'il''~ i . .1~~~--..tt` .f ~ , w-~_~(~ ~ J_'1~
IF rj
'r 1' 'f r ,l T
/I 1 1.,r 1 L
l 11 r~.R~...... , -S r( 'a} N ,•r i11 ~ r\ J 1 1 tl r AV's
'
L~ w_K"1•~ / -4- L~ ~ ~ ~`I _ ~ ~ 111.
,17.I , f y-•
f
lM5 I a. A .tr..- J1 ~ C. t• r ~.^r0a....f 1
'~f/_ 'M••"►1♦.rn w. 1,,'. ~l~ ::..n«='.. ;,r -a. /
i_ 110• ~ , . ~ JI 1. t x ---e ~ --4~~~~,y 2{
1 WM1•~•~O to/ 34:3.5, V f, ,w " r •'r_ rr
, .•1 • ry ~...w.r",rw .i+Y .•w t=X15•-_",. ~ 1
..."rwlirini rM ~ Prot Y r r l~.~ . . _ r r 1
. 1r.1: iw .~w'r r• w r nw r.1 r • ►.ri •.r I I'I JI r~
.-r•..• rw.i n wrwr . kJM
r +r1♦h n 1^'n"i .,wr ~ ww I wVM f ti 11 b 4
r♦.. M.. w~~ wl rnrn ..Z 1 ` w' 7
M1H rwr ;,I 't?
r`. rl.r r w r r • w' w.ir 1. • ' a . V rj~, w ~
1 nw rw, 11= . A. • Nw. .~w. 4rl.w ~~r I
nN +ri ,w rl 1W4 rl }r ~rj w ~r Y .V OM rl r ~ . •
rM1.fowwrlr iwl 111Yr * MrY-, ol
. w rrrw.rr w r•.t rY • r ww~ r • L I wri t - 1''(}~
jn•w.n.n..il.
1wr• ,.'rnT .l lrr'ni4b r•xv . 1NI~ 1, l1b
~r 1Y 1Ln11.1 RJ ~qM /1~
.1'.. Mw qO Y~rr wrnw p. ~r\.IIw h4 M h M /M.y 0...
~ r.1 r rl• y r. 1r Hrwnr rl., r r M.~'1r,r.{'wrt • r'+1 ~ R"♦' W 4 1.
rti~ 11M Y a,.. rlr r rr r. ru wl n. w. r„1•~..~..`r '1•' Y. t , Q r JM
lo1hw•tw 1•M rwl'.IYM• w '.'ANA
r~r+ Y rw rw.r IwUMr..w~1rr1
.111. n• r Yy..w r .rr wa rlrrl M ~.\1 I r N
' •+w 1111r... r11.1r r w'+b •r ri..wn ti1 tir 11w wV .wAl t M •T ji:q.. Y
r/rwlwrrwrti r• a-m r 1 ,
wrq F 111r rF r ""Plrlt ♦1 • '..il M rprl • 1 M Y r M
URBAN uA!
ENOINEERJNO - Y=
.er@I rel./ ( Y... ~ I,r "Llo'P441 C(..'t.c+uavr qa 6UMMERWIAD rl'r.
to 1•. nn L -5-''-7 ..x k _
. r ~ "fr - ~~1f' "6tLt l .'>A. [v 1 1! t• t•Y ey
~s 1 7 n~~
•Ye.n>r.w`v3r•+1•.tslby"~.y1.,. .t r 7r ♦r: l~t~~~l• ~trl ~.'./iR 1. irir..+.~ LW.
RZ I
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: General Development Plan of the Ridgeway Meadows
Addition, Phase I
SUMMARY: This tract is 161.7 acres locaced at the
northeast corner of FM 2181 and Lillian Miller
Parkway. The property is zoned planned
development (PD), and single family,
multi-family, cluster, and general retail
development is anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanft.ary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The general development plan conforms to the
minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision
and Land Development Regulations.
The purpose of the general development plan is
to allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to
review proposed thoroughfare patterns, land use
and the relationship to adjoining property.
ACTIOF REQUIRED: Approval of the general development plan
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning anO Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced general development plan
iuat s~,_
Denise S ivcfy
Urban Planner
0996s
rww '
MOM
1f1 ' '.r• J , !I i ' Ili ' •±.1 I • ` 1. • i . 1 \
,;;1;11 „ X11! ; ,J l Ir , ' -,16~
. ~ - 1 l I \ 10 COOdF Tr c - ,
11110114 F"*
10000 M
Sao
anKM 11~ `'Allll.'i alllry Perk - ,
NN I
, net
r
• r r' ~ I ! '1 i I
sb* Fancy/ i T aC 1 t
111 Nowton Od*O ' ' ' ti
/D-10/OMnM r 1
iw■ w~ I Dotal tk1f001 Site
/D EE/OnMa &W Tiro raway }
lkWeY~lop~d ,v ;
U MEADQWS
1 VENSION DEVELOPMENT JOMPANY .r'
CITY COUNCIL
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary replat of the Summit Addition, Lots
1 and 2, Block 1
SUMMARY: Tnis tract is 13.7 acres located at the
southeast corner of Johnson and Daugherty
Streets. Tnis tract is shown in the Alexander
Hill Survey, Abstract 623, Denton, Texas. "he
property is zoned commercial (C), and
multi-family development is anticir,±ed.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision c~nd Land Development
Regulations.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDArIUN: Tne Planning and zoning ~:om+nisaion recommends
aporoval with the condition that Johnson Street-
he imprcved from this project to Dallas,Drive.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
QP J'(
U 2n1s ivey
Ur:)an Planner
13429/1
BANES LOTT I I ( { VAMMT IOCA
Y
1 ~ r,< sneer.
v IVCIOI sai,aa' aav {j O6'[ TTI,I e+.+.1 ~r
.e
AMC r aT b Z,~,i a VICINITY, MAP
✓ y r eo' oo• aa.~a' ~r . T.i MON 00 CA }y ,/l }.f 1 al
t -il-"~~! 1 F ANN F CTanLI
I 1 i pq uno.
' BLOC / ZONED Ilsr cut ,
r n _ I
FO[ DAOCFS[RT f I [ I _ C .k T... r• ti - : ^ 0 ACA WMviaoN
t~ . nA d~fvrr<n vr~ ._..L. I I 1 R
f I ~ j ~III~
,r
A a • . ql Aa' ~
HLNAT eAR DAYIO 6A0T dts a11 d.... " SO•
I ' r <Z609 ccr'4aft Mrs ITY and COUNTY of DENTONITX
PRELIMINARY REPLAT
POINT Of 9TALNAINa J
[3.732 ACRES
-SUR DI THE
A. HILL -SURVEY AB. Or,
SUMMIT ADDITION
LOTS I and ' 2
OW4M,* DAVID MOUNHUIe
3t51 $TATE St SUTE 210
SANTA aAga" CA 9705
rem aet atts
' maat roro1
1. swrOWty im Owned terereld. • '
d, kt.dvrnui na to wo-Teed n»d plea. EURKE Epj(;'N£ER1N0,r
IMAN IUIIKE, PA '
,1• 14 "Utm i ycdly u lidLT~iNa~es"to. rwt..tlt CONSULTINO CAVIL IENGIW 1►.
eTmV~due M~ryOwe-atN,
TtMd IH tatad _ L V I a L- o f Y -
~r z:.see •
IT c"4'
~~~e~aaafat'J~
CITY COUNCIL
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: Octohdr 10 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary replat of the Sun Valley Addition,
Lot 14, Block A
SUMMARY: Tnis tract is 0.68 acres located on the south
side of Hercules Lane 15U feet west of Stuart
Rr)ad. This tract is shown in the B.B.B. and
C.R.R. Survey, Abstract 186, Denton, Texas. The
property is zoned generAl retail (GR), and
retail development is anticipated.
The developer is investigating options for
utility service to this tract.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary replat
RECOMMENDATIOd: 'Eno Planning and zoning Commission recommends
approval
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
Denise Sp ve
Uroan Planner
1342g/9
Ynl
T•y wJ
jI LI • 1 ~ 4r ~ ~ r~J,l
=--,soLOCA1iON NAPY
Wnfm
I I
I
I
yf,,y uL{r AOOI os I LOT 11, /LOCK [Maf BUT MOYCC lo w& A I 0,//1 A{, iIOL llf, Ap
lw& 'L 701,( 0[NLRAL OCTAIL lope b vm I 10
, 117Ti4Li fL[pC~ ,~fiu OG.
I I fbKAAI Al-W lope
C p
lOt II
' LOT f SLOT 1 I 110 0
t ■ I y,I,y.yACi[r^AObTI N
J IY~ /LOCRN A
i CA/ A.PON
T., T tool
V IS D
M[1141NAM 4tfLAT E
SUN VALLEY ADDITION
LOT 14, !LOCK A
0./U A{TfL
Aloe M port of &A VellAy Ad6Np4
/Ac1Af I, block AI Aawood h
VAI, t,
/ h I// Plat Mewds 0.CT.
C. AK. CO aRNtT ki//
CRY a Cowl of D{nl[A, T{I{[ RECEIVED St' 1 S 1385
0[N[L00/A I
44CA &ELL
I VALLtt AOOIT,ON
LOT N OLACA 1
1
tOtAFD1 / AINOMM. tMO
IIIIJI/y { FIr/rNl
~JI.J~~ F i,•1 rat Yyl« OIFr w1,A n..L=~N1
0 A4&
r ` a w,.
CITY ..OUNCIL
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEEP
MEEPING DATA;: October 10 1985
SUBJECT. Preliminary and final replace of the Teasley Mall
Subdivision, Lot 1R, Block A
SUMMARY: This tract is 0.3 acre located at the southwest
corner of Teasley Lane and Londonderry Lane.
This tract is shown is the C. Poullalier Survey,
Abstract 1007. Denton, Texas. Ttie property is
zoned office j0), and office development is
anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
The purpose of the replat is to eliminate an
existing interior lot line and create one large
lot. The develoier is propo,ing an addition to
an existing offic.: building.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final•replats
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning ani Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
A71TACHME a uCed p#1t
Denise Spifey
Urban Planner
1228a
r 1 YIA I
• LONOOND RAT NT
[nATr e b A.O M. /
ARnN f--- ,
vA
Irdr rA
TEA7LIT MALL /.AOT!SON AArB~-
RERLAT Of LOT 7, /LOCK A
Amoco VOL M, 10 1 t
/IYEAAL MI7A4 IONS B~ 1
i~
~A I W
fl 0.01 Y
4ALA0V MAAAWMt MT, IMO, t
VOL. MT. ►t. 170
A/R,p UITLRE 204E ;
ANELIACNART RVLAT
TEASLEY MALL SUlOIVIVON
LOT 111I ILOIM A
0.344 At
80N6 A AEn AT DR LO tI I A 8; O.V-4
AI TLATLIV MALL MDIVIAION, PiCDOM
iN 8000 q, AAct 01, R. a t. r.
NTT AV Cou"" or oTNTON, TIAAS
t. ►OULLAOIN BuR41 A•100f
W 7ML=L
NL
wr
LOT IR WU t MAON
L0T 83x0 A
IItLD/, Eef ARDA 8 A8/OOIAT//, AO.
I~nrl 'YWM1~ /M, NMMwA
MMOR Rrr{ NNI
O--T~~~ n 0.7414
FrlO 11,1 006
M
11at9Att01
aln or rtxA7
oalrrr OF /171Tar
I I Or. read TI I A in r: toot coo, or rf
N1lallar 14,rtr Ak uftc Zh" 1001, Ai
holy all iaNlrl" N, rrW/N 4 filntw tN If CaNtal W MSy ell N lu 1
T4 s
7, IIKI
9 31 tANt+Kt ,toot ti IoM few the Clt/ N Amtw, sow rso.T111t Cooseetr+~fAN uW
~W, . Tract U+/y4 City N deeN at1 Mlp IN I M C.
ll
K014 N ta cotter. m+ late Nr nt1. a,4 MIv1
1 a prtfetluh faacrilad AN hllNee IM'
M11ulp at M INN M4,, it. c W aNt Mau Come ad "!1 74 74:114A hKl,
Jlt Mle1
ti MW rllht.el-4,1 N Tasaiy a I+eat atasl Jla No
C. POULLALI X11 ip'•l w
ER SURVEY A•1007 TA"u Aerth 11 date", 04 Neat" All wow$ tool 111uree N 110.
teeth"At career of soil let 7! Ot fNl " a
I Pat
TMncr North M /e1tNa 11 RI"tn If a d, tan 1 /l,tr,ca of as"b"at career Mull {et 1. al" Mfa1 N the taste rl Myf.
"'q !"1 b • W rrl pie at he
r= lnsItthau AI . le r"s b •111,44, a f wf NW,f lr qvo eel h!ot
4" , / 7 cao,11a test NU tte aweh et
" to
75,0 last. to • W"I Ma A at to Polluted N ,
corn to rtjhee
h"aO1tr
LONDONDERRY LAhft cast 1CR0a wotr Metlaaatatl •1001 Nlf ar""tLM 1 [1114,14 N M da1r"a by arassoot7
• • Tow, c state aE 11.0 feet- Ad a •01x1 Mvln a L..
Iaii 7( u1 u are of,unc, N 30.25 fast L a Wool pie n AM w" LM -44 H LT Keu" q AM, Lxl 71.7!
t 1~jTy a s lhtyf-etp N Wf fw,
I
7u1 heel
.,r at Tom, saaap 01 4.1'"A 11 a auto, 01 won4 We., A,h sold rlp"t-,eiI , +l
K(1jSj~~~ tht M1let N M14.1q aM entta1a1n1 b oil 0.74 Kres of
~
/y natea N 14,37 Iv"
IICaLaTId ALL t41dn 7qR a~ e. t y' q IAN. TWILMI[, CROW ALL Ha If MI7c FW&Tt
TEA9ttl0 ALL f►pRj R LOT IR ' ,11kOCK . A~ ' 0 rut.
t 1, or. /r4, T11111 t w adopt [114 plat of A _
LOT ! LOt k 11, Ito i 1, !Maly all 1W rf etN a eM Olt of I`nt"ot be hsrrb /roctlMf fn+arL/ N Let
Atco"c tO INlau AM pNll[ W forever street, N+ N
f Ma tw foa l
_ t "rota rl+etr t"n N, 1 taus, ,N /e Mob/
" RIMOS't1'<f Ip0.06' 1111171 Of rubs r I a
offell it, tM.Mi IYNr a/ p1"J two. knew to is to he the PayeMAIN f UP es ttrwaa O N T"N. N this dal J4,,plyllr l am acaud It..17 M/
NAOf W 1• w tMl M esac to la aa1K111tf l1 the 4e 1
VOL
pie III/, IC 170 We W is the taMtitl oats!, "nod the Me far low iuMr W tan,ldarstleasttMra4e tgra„ad
CAM "tar a1 hand WA anal of Nf14, it" he t -ttl of- IMS.
are 1 1L M l ate t •a4,
Cws1"Iw bplreol
1191071 11T l I1t
10010 TOW " If 7"61 fItlORfLJL t
That 1. ltuferl Rtyta"e, fe S-t R[RLAT 01 p
bad 1Kad a"itlw 4, Ktul MI aeetrttNNny4N tMf u+ A. beee/l nn,fr tot 7 prepared this plot
TEASLET' of "rapid N0"Isim 11 taae4wo It1 et othat , to Irw toe. aMyWl tMr
MALL SVBO11:SION 1010 iN ew "to
LOT IR1 !LOCK A i aA,Iwls
0.344 A1. `
191016 A At►LAT Of LOT, 1 1 tt 1Latc far.""Mi1ar r wr It
AI TtAlLt/ MALL /VODM IqN, Rt00r10m ~whttlfMA IN
N 1008 O. /A0/ alt R, R. O C t '
Ce7r A40 COV01T/ 01 11911tON. TEIA$
O. IOVLLAIItR OVRVb A-1001
/
_ o,1„LR r
00. IRLD TOW1
LOUTMN MAR
f1tT l•aw
TLAILLI MALL 14161y1py1
LOT IA LLOCA A
IKD illlq t:1K1, ChWA1tM / AJ10O+AT1 R .
`_~N e w rat, arynr MtwTa"ww I INmN
w Mara nw ra/f1
0.1/04
x v, 7-
WrYofDENTON,rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 16201 / TELEPHONE(811)566.8200
September 17, 1985
M F M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician
THRU: William Jay Anderson, Assistant Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund
RECOMMENDATION:
Tax Technician recommends that tax refu,.id be issaed.
SUMMARY:
Chapter 31, Section 51,11 of Texas property Tax
Code requires the ayproval of the governing body
of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500.00.
Taxpayer, First Texas Savings Association, has re-
quested a refund in the amount of $611.46 for dup-
licate tax payments on same account for tax year
1984.
BACKGROUND:
First Texas Savings Association should have paid tuxes
on account number 7182-01000 in the amount o: $585.96.
hcy paid $611,46 on December 30, 1984 and $585.96 on
January 11, 19850 they are requesting that the differ-
ence of $611.46 be refunded.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$311.46 to be refunded.
Respectfully submitted,
V_utor Schneider
Tax Technician
a
William Y Anderson
Assistanic irector of Finance
Dora APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
Ila:end ApplksUon 71.11 f1/e?i
Collecting Office Name: City of Denton Tax Department
Collecting Tax For: city o Denton
(Taxing Units)
215 East McKinney Street, Denton, Texas 76201
Address
City, State, Zip Code
-
In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the taxpayer.
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER:
Name: First Texas Savings Assn.
Address: ree , 'M as,-Te-xas--7Mik6 tin: Bobble CrTs-w-eTj-
Telephone Number (if additional Information Is needod):
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY:
Description of Property: Lot 10A Slic 25 Southridge Addition/2213 Woodbrook
Address or Location of Properrtty~ _
Account Number of Property.% or Tax Receipt Number:
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES:
Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of
From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund
Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested
1 City 19 82 12-30 / 19 82 $ 611.46 $ 611.46 f
2. 19 82 lv-~- / 1983 $ °85.96 $
3. 19 $ $ !
Taxpayer's raason for refund (attach supporting documomtation):
PERM DUE TO DUPLICATE TAX PAYAtM A 71D LATE RECEIP'T' OF tKMWTF,AI) IM11P ION
"I hereby apply for the refund of the abovadescribed taxes and certify that the Information I have given on this form
Is true and correct"
cVF ATrACILM t EME'FR APRIL 3. 1985
Signature Date of Application for Tax Refund
DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUN • XXXX. Approval Disapproval
i~ ~ ~2--- Pe; L~ (C 4-1, APRIL 3, 1985
Signature of Authorized Officer" MARK E. Dat.
Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Data
Unit(s) for refund applications over $500
Any parson who makes a false entry upon the forpoing retard shall be sublact to one of the Ioar wing pensiVes: 1. Imprisonment of
iot more then 10 years not lase than 2 years and/or a tine of nol more Than 65,0)0 or both such tins and
Imprisonment; 2, confinement In jog for a term up to 1 year at a Ilne not to exceed 62,000 or both such fine and Imprisonment asset
forth In Section 31.10, PRnal Code.
30 COLLECTIONS
F1 RS
Savings Aii6i l tlon
April 2,1985
City of Denton Tax Office
Mark Schmitz
Municipal Bldg
Denton Tx 76201
Dear Mark,
Per our phone converstion of April 2,1--1945 regarding the account number
7182-01000for 1982,.,taxes,which we paid $611.14 and $585.96 we are requesting
his pa;ment did not reflect the homestead exenption
the refund of 11.46\as this'
that had ben r_$n -64 Please refund to Rife attention of account number 11-041791-5
/09-10-1322 and directly to my attention.
Thankypu.
Sincerely (p J3
q3 -E_ W3
Bobbie Criswell
ADMINISTRATIVE Off ICES • 3,15 WEST TWELFTH SMUT • DALLAS TEXAS 75208 • 041948-24010
~Mw
f
3r•i Ri
k ~r " •r ~rti- r- f t i { t ri :,.JR 3,11 'r'i 'j•I ,
rt r,3 ..r :K ~t j'~•.n rL • "J:y.♦-~ 1! ~ 'S', ' ,J T'^•IJ a . J V , {f ~ N~1'!~l ~::'r~Y*•,W!~ i
j-(µ0 1,. rri 4;`-, •.,5lA .j 13 r Iii'}.'tt., ~).r y~ k-5~~4. Y~j..
w- ~1'
~l`. 'jy'.. ~7 ,•.jl L•~,a ,rl♦ 5 W~~„ ! i , '.1 •p' r :,l'.` '
1 y 't! r
..s a1,R t ~ 'f ,..w .~J, 'L.r -r.~i 1-. ♦ f ,V , r i ' r •'y, s
i:,~ P vv
r~
• ''dam' `IR '-v} ~1n A ♦ 1l 7 i.
'j '~1~'..` e,'' • S ~ 7 r i^~ ' r' ' 1 1 v -ter, r is r } ' . i • „ , l_ a!' „ ~ 3r.- 1
.i t'll 1*u *ntr •Il li d ~J i l . r yla R ;J. ~a, r -t I 1 `•~a• S1f 17 p~
S3 , ik,1 •i, j .;~w a, yi;^'C"~t( ~('t. (N ~ . ?tTi ~.k'r7n~ c'41! ~r • ti „ .r r ,-w.. 5, ~ ,yf^ \,.'y, r' J j:~}: :~~lc""~ ,i{,•!~
yb~ r,~i~ AJ ~•~t''•
♦ '~5,, 1« .ti F rLT.:q }r".r~:~' \ ~i f y 3' i. s .v 5~ 1:a LS, I•..k'rry+~. ~,j14
, r1 ( ■{~j'.~ 4 'Y 1'Y f ~•.Y~6 ~R l'
n'E , r '3l K , •w ~ J ~ I• r , . + ? `•r Y•_ ~41, ~IY{S~.'Y.f {i
~/1 } •J J~w ).r Tlf.i:1y f'C 1~5~., 'G• , ` '\I y~ 1 1 r } i, •;rr `f Gir Iii .7W i II .x9 Jr. •L[l^.
yyy 1 / ~•.1' , J5••I l,r: J♦ 7' r ;1. w', +,.ri f 3,.~ d IY.
_ '4.
sj,~
ly. t..•
• A l ~ f 1 4 R . J1♦ ~
J " ` ' r:}' t. 1 r •r. 3 ) . . ; r , , 11., °Mt.A_Y~+ ^J ; y-4M>N
O h ;!C J r~ ~ rt •y ~.,''la Rj~~Mf` I r 1,: 5 + .i. + , ~Y •J .I r Y+r• 1 a~yr L.V ♦s 4; f~S 1; 4'lz f.
1!f/1'. Ji 1 r~ ~lAtr -•r ..?r~ , yx r',•. ~....•.r..._.5 ii Jl.4wlb..
Al
ntl~
t ? y= R' r r R` Yalta AXES ARE DUE OCTOBER Ciro ofDen/rn rot dp3tr,nrol
! t A'a R, 'rf t!J} } k ~ k r fC it AND BECOME OflINOUENT Hv,3{ipol /ruldieg
TAX STATEMENT
s i F r S. f1 tyfJ3 ? fEBPUARY 1st SEE REVERSE dJin..Tr1.374:U!
SIDE FOR PENALTY AND INTER
i ,a.¢ .f' r~i ''a i.r., F ,?',T /H01L J6A-dl1R
`if i ~r 1, c { j • „ ' EST DETAILS
; 1 ate' e `
SCRIPT LUT 10A 1
J
. } r' V ACCOUNT NUMBER TAX YR PATUM
ZQ~J o///AIIT~T _ Tld2-0l 000 14'82 •J
r'', 1 r ry
x1~ e rr. rti'. 1 S N 1AOCATION ASSESSED EXEMPT TAXABLE YAWS
1 1)0094 11 gm d~04
SURVEYOR MKT. APPRAISED TAX DUE
tt {
c
EdJ4 b11.♦i
RATIO PENALTY
411
;.1 J ~ • ` .611 .4o.
F14ANCES Ke GUYNLS
' 2213 M'L• ST u;itjJK
oPlTUN► TX 7G201 11
1
v • 4 s. ~,'t~ 1 . . 4 2 'q't'r - . ° o' - r, . _ . . j.. , ~ g- l.lr'•l•• i^w"•...a r.-~..~ ~q•.
0 y~r1l~t+w~ie~ •,'•y 1 a~. R4; ! L3! r^.. i . a ~ r t ' r «.,,p7 '.+s'?~•p_•'..'~R4~r'7!`.:.l , YI~ ~i.
i
October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CI '
TY COUNCIL
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Final Payment, CIP Project 85-S-9, Woodrow Lane
Sewer, to Albenestus Construction in the Amount of
$14,163.30.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September
18, 198S, recommended to the City Council approval of the
final payment In the amount of $14,163.30 to Albe,kestus
Construction.
SUMMARY
This project was earlier recommended by the Public
Utilities Board and awarded by the City Council to the
second lowest hiddsr, Albonesius Contracting. The project
is completed as per the plans and specifications, pending
formal acceptance by the Utility Department, Hence, this
request for approval of final payment to the co, tractor.
BACKGROUND
This is ar approved I'Y 85- CIP project. This is to relieve
and to provide extra capacity to an already overloaded 8"
sanitary sewer line un Woodrow Lane. About 3900 LF of
sewer line from 14" to 18" in sizes has been installed in
this project,
PT,OGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Denton Municipal Utilities, City Engineer, the contractor,
and citizens.
3934U:7
ji ejl 4ti-."7~e .~.n rvx ~..4' .y k ..lt N,i
FISCAL IAPACT
FY 85 budgeted amount $147,000.00
Recommended Award as Sid $139,711.00"
Actual Cost after Construction 141,633.50a
Previous payments to Contractor 127,470.20
Final Payment due (this request) $14,163.30
*actual cost is more ($19921.50) than the recommended
award. This is due to about 91 LF of extra 10.' pipe that
had to be installed due to field conditions.
Source of funds: sewer bonds- 624-008-0471-9942
Prepared by: R Srini Soidaramoorthy Civil Engineer Acting City Manager
Approved:
k-7 E. a son
Director of Utilities
Exhibit 1 L,atailed estimate 93 and final
II Location map
III Minutes PUB Meeting of 9/18/5
3930:8
S
7 t1Nf~fe no
Job-Mo. I DO
Projects WOODROW LANE SEVER IMPROVEMENTS
Ovour t conlese nald 7- / 7- 16-1.
CITY of DENTONs TEXAS oaf* of Iasi 1160414 JERRY CLARK Cart of ibis fslimale 9- 9- 8 S-
IXIAILEO ESTIMAT$ _
lM - • II10
7 1MORK .
I
~O. 01lt~1IT101f Um mw n' . TOIAt tots toWlittO VAIVI
VMtiT~ 'A.t.'1. Co&"io W6At
LACK. M
18" Sa , Sewer Main 9 4
8' Duo 'rrron ewer Pipe SOU-44-nn
511 n. ewar maln 15~
2 00
161
If Dueti~e IrSew
"San ever Main 43L 21,00 903 00
2411 Bore Casing Pipe SOL .00 7 000,$0 6"6- -2o6o, 00
onore a noasemeti0 4 C
40
1
. !JG
annel Grading AT Pettan Creek Lump 2 000 00 2 000.00
Sewer Main Crossing um
.
AIL
f
i
l
Tots CentrmCost i 77T-2. 00 TOTAL
A"ftvsd Contrad CT Orders
A00 Ot011CT
No.
No.
No.
T0141
I Conlr6d cost to 0111e -
.o..U»...N»N.«.b.N.U UNO«.wHN.1..«u...HU b. «U NN.N......
e of Compl.ted work and rmf*rlsls stored on site .............................N............«......... ,...............N........»
Last hislned Pwcw I"It pmell) »...u«Naw.««.N.«...««««.wuw««w...»N.w.uuu uu uuNNN n...w..»N. w.»
T010
otal Amount Ow{ +T-W~Wk* *As fithmt' ....N«............NYY.NN»w.w.»M..«N..N...M.......N.«..w«......................».«.N
Ld1t. Etllnml`. _._-ly Afptovad . w..«..»..«.»NfwM.. ...w........... .N.,................ &.1..
NNw»
Mwiunt Ow Thk Nakaste
J9t75
~?lCan
~ Of
S2
.i
39
s,
~ ~ ~ PROJECT ~ f
A4
or;. Ss s
SHADV f ( '`-ie
SPENCER R0.
¢0,9
q~
0 9q~~
YL~ q0
l,ssE
_LOCATIQN MAP
N.T.S. \
EX►f!Q!T
,
t
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
Seltember 18, 1985
CONSENT AGENDA;
a. Consider Proposed Oversize Agreement with WINDSOR
WEST ADDITUN, W.H. SMITH, OWNER, AND/OR HIS ~CSSTGR'5~
for a new Water line.
Thompson made a motion to recommend approval. Frady
seconded the motion. All ayes, no nayes, motion
carried.
b. Consider proposed Water Line Pro Rata Agreement
with WINDSOR WEST ADDITUN, W.H. SMITH, OWNER, AND/OR
HIS ASSIGNS
Motion was made by Coomes. Boyd seconded the motion.
All ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
c. Consider Participation cost CERTIFICATE OF FINAL
COST for Water Line and ewer ne ve'II'er.%iae
Agreement, MEADOWS MOBILE HOME PARK. HOL,IGAN
DEVELOPMENT C.
Thompson made notion. Motion was seconded by Frady.
All ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
d.' Consider Final Payment CIP Project 65-S-9 WOODROW
LANE SEWER TO ALBEf~ESiUS CONSTRUCTION In the mo►tnt
of *14,163.50.
Coomes made motion. Boyd seconded motion. All ayes,
no nayes, motion carried.
e. Consider Final Payyment, LIP Project 85-WP-6 HIGH
SERVICE PUMP t3' INSTALL7CTTO.V TO RED kIVER CONSTRUCTM
IF THB OU T OF412, 515.
Thompson made motion. Seconded by Frady. All ayes,
no nayes, motion carried.
77
October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA IT174 D.
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Final Payment, CIP Project 85-WP-6 High Service: Pum
Y5 Installation, to Red River Construction in the Amount o~
$42,515.
RECOMA ENDA°i ION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 18,
1985, and Freese & Nichols, Inc., Engineers, recommend approval
of this final payment to Red River Construction Company in the
awount of $42,5iS.
SWHARY
On August 27, 1985, the Utility Department Staff and Freese and
Nichols Inc., Engineers, had made a final inspection of the
project site and found that the job was completed in accordance
with plans and specitications, hence this request for approval
of the tinal payment to the contractor.
BACKGROUND
This approved 1985 CIP project was awarded by the Public
Utilities Board and the City Council to the lowest qualified
bidder, ,Red River Construction Company. Corstruction was
started February 1, 1985. The date of the final inspection,
August 27, 1985, is being established as the date of
commencement of all warranties and the one year correction
period required by the contract document.
PROGRAMS, DEPARIM ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
City of Denton Municipal Utilities, Freese F, Nichols, Inc., the
Contractor and the citizens.
FISCAL IMPACT
Total Budgeted:
Phase I purchase of pum s/Motors) $305,000
Phase II Pump installation J
3934U:14
Total Awards:
Phase 1 (not this agenda item) $ S11393
Phase 11 Previous Payments $226,935
This Final Payment $42,515
TOTAL AWARD $320,843
There is no change order on this item.
Source of Funds: Bond tends 623-008-0460-9101-7941
Prepared by: Re ec ully ubmitted,
S-r151 san aramoor y '
Livil Engineer Rick vehla
Water/Wastewater Divisions Acting City Manager
r vet ,
P
Ae.
~veTson
Director of Utilities
FXIII61T I Letter of acceptance from Freese & Nichols Inc.
It Pay estimate 06 and final
111 Minutes PUB ideeting of 9/18/85
~I
I
39340:15
i
i
i
1
•t ,
t R 1N14 ky
,i ~ LLLIRLLLL~FN.Y[
Ro,L>,.,.. told,
R~OGLAT A. TNOY►GON oil. ►a
C 0 N S U I T I N 0 1N01NEits
0~Tooloa eo=rs.
jog AN16T ek' itpir, ►L
. August 30, 1985 WIN C. Co►~iANG. rs
GARY N. RLLVLL, ►L.
Mr, C. David Ham, P.E.
Assistant Director of Utilities
City of Denton
Service Center/Warehouse
901-A Texas Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: City of Denton
High Service Pump Station Extension
Periodical Estimate No. b and Final
Oear Mr. Ham:
A final inspection was made Tuesday, August 27, 1985 and all work was
found to be completed in apparent accordance with the contract plans and
specifications, The date of substantial completion is hereby established
as August 27, 1985, which is also the date of commencement of all
warranties and the one year correction period required by the contract
documents.
Attached, please find two (2) copies of the Periodical Estimate No. 6 and
Final for Red River Construction Company for the construction of the High
Service Pump Station Extension covering work from July 1, 1985 to July 23,
1985.
We have reviewed the quantities on the estimate from the Contractor and
recommend that the final amount of $42,515.00 be paid.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
FREESE AND /N~ICHOLS, INC.
Coy M. Yeach, P.E,
CMY:kdw
Attachment
058JFJ,LTR
xc: Jerry Roush
Dean Porter
oil to MA0 GT 01 99 7 ►007 WOMTN, TLMA• Po 1OG
TttL►N7NL got 0!G loot MR.TRO alt .!o • 1000
+r• :.Z~ a r9~r .;r r °r nL~~I" r 1`lr: kv- .,a r~, ,.-..rr-~1
f Ydyr'1 U1
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT
Periodical Estimate No. 6b~ Per! r,d Ju1y 1, 1985 t July 2g3, 1985
City of Denton Address: Dntonsaexa
Came of Owner: s 76201
P. 0. Box 923
Name of Contractor:- Red River Construction Co. Address: Addison, Texas 75001
High Service Pump Stat on
TypeofP3roject:- Extension Estimated Contract Cost: $ 277,700.00
Item Unit aantit Q"Atlty Unit Vaiue of
No. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM of ri inel completed co pykw
Measure Est!`nute to veto Pried Work
i
1 Construction of High Service Pume
Station x ens on.
Ia Bond and Insurance L.S. 1 1 40650 4,650.00
1b Excavation L.S. 1 1 221900 22,900.00
1c Concrete Slab C.Y. 40 40 200 8,000.00
1 Concrete Supports C.Y. 5 5 300 10500.00
1 Walls C.Y. 32 32 300 99600.00
1 Top Slab C.Y. 21 21 300 6,300.00
1 Parapet Nall C.Y. 9 9 300 2,700.00
1 Suction Tie-in to Pump Station L.S. 1 1 20,000 20,000.00
li Suction Header L.S. 1 1 24,500 24,500.00
IS Install Pump L.S. 1 1 29200 2.200.00
1 Valves Each 8 8 50800 46,400.00
11 Discharge Hea& r L.S. 1 1 200000 20,000.00
1 Discharge Tie-in From Pump
Station L.S 1 1 20,000 20,000.00
.
1 Sump Pump and Piping L.S. 1 1,300 1.300.00
1 Miscellaneous F.itals L.S. 1 1 50700 5,700.00
1 Painting L.S. 1 1 3,000 39000.00
1 Backfill L.S. 1 1 119000 11,000.00
1 Electrical L.S. 1 1 260000 26,000.00
YY\ A
page z of t
r
Unit qu.ntity ~QQua~ntit PUrincte
No. Item DESCRIPTION OF ITEM of Original I Comppleted Compled
lotf
Measure E.tlrruto to Date work
is Repair Existing Roadway L.S. 1 1 1,700 19700.00
It Jobsite Overhead Mo. 4 4 8,000 32s000.00
269,450. 0
2 &sW gr Deduct JUM
2a Extra 1500 psi Concrete C.Y. 25 100
2b Extra 3000 psi Concrete C.Y. 15 200
2c Extra Rebar Lbs. 1500 0150
2d Extra Concrete Backfill C.Y. 25 80
The undersigned Contractor certifies Lhat all work, including materials and
equipment on hand, covered by this Periodical Payment has been completed or
delivered in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have
been paid by him for work, materials, and equipment for which previous
Periodical Payments were issued and received from the Owner, and that the
current payment shown herein is now due.
CONTRACTOR RED RIVER CONSTRUCTION Ry tl~,,....,_ Date 7/25/85
can or e.
Subscribed and thi 25th day of July lg
85
Notary Public: o com
My Commission res: 10-28-87
Recommended for Payment by: Total Value of Original Contract Performed , , +269,450.00
zits Work Performed Shown Above or -0-
eese an to s ate Attached Statement . . .
"I Tr X or -
/ g -0_
Jrlrt_rials on band- AttacShownhed Above
~`~^^~~•"w'~'"' n~ Stata ement .
Date Total Value of Work to Date. . . . , , 92699450.00
Date Lela: Amount Retained _.,.0--% . . . . . . . -0-
Net Amount Earned on Contract 9264,450.00
Date
Approved for Payment By: Lela: Amount of Previous Payments _ 226,935.00
Uri BALANCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE , , , , . . $ 429315.00
+byv t ut c
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT
• Periodical Estimate No• ¢ perm July 1, 1985 t July 23, 1985
Name of Owner; City of Denton ~~~1faing
Address: Deni,;n0 Texas 76201
P, 0. Box 3
Name of Contractor. Red R1 er Construction Co. Address ; Addison. Texas 75001
High Service Pump Station
TypeofProject:-Extension EstimatedContract Cost:; 277,700.00
lttm Unit Quamitr Quantity Valua sf
unit
No. DESCRIPTION OP ITEM of Oriylaal Complekd Nice
Complekd
Neuure Eetlmaw to Mtn o
I
1 Construction of High Service Pump
Station x en'sTon.
la Bond and insurance L.S. 1 i 4,650 4,650.00
lb Excavation L.S. 1 1 220900 22,900.00
l Concrete Slab C.Y. 40 40 200 8,000.00
1 Concrete Supports C.Y. 5 5 300 19500.00
1 lulls C.Y. 32 32 300 9,600.00
. 1 Top Slab C.Y. 21 21 300 6,300.00
1 Parapet Wall C.Y. 9 9 300 2,700.00
1 Suction Tie-in to Pump Station L.S. 1 1 200000 20,000.00
i
1i Suction Header L.S. 1 241500 24,500.00
1j install Pump L.S. 1 1 29200 20200.00
1 Valves Each 8 8 50800 46,400.00
11 Discharge Header L.S. 1 1 200000 20,000,00
l Discharge Tie-in From Pump
Station L.S. 1 1 200000 20.000.00
1 Sump Pump and Piping L.S. 1 1 19300 1,300.00
1 Miscellaneous Metals L.S. 1 1 50700 50700.00
1 Painting L.S. 1 1 3,000 3,000.00
1 Bacx II L.S. 1 1 110000 111000.00
1 Electrical L.S. 1 1 261000 26,000.00
. ti
71
f May f7. 1"1
Mrp David Mamm
Assistant city utility Director
Mntont Texas 76210
Dear W. Mains
i write to you in response to the phone conversation we
had on May 179 t"4 at J p.m6 pertalning to the 82 acres at the
corner of Payne Drive and Bonnie Srae. We need a letter from
you stating information Concerning water and sewer for proposed
planned devetope"t sh~ an the enclosed map. Your assistance
and iseldiate attention will be greatly appreciated.
Bln Orel Larry Frank
s~F Ilk-
~xa,8,r I1'.
- r. r r r ~ W l r• r.~. r r r r r r
r • 1 l
1 • ,
. ~ y.. iii. ,
IJJMI ° 1
Jfrll~ ~ + , y:: ~ .
1
- r ~
A r R r - l a i
rpund
LA '
■
• 0 BM w
Ile, 0
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
September 18, 1985
CONSENT AGENDA:
as Consider Proposed Oversize Agreement with WINDSOR
WEST ADDITON, W.,H. SMITH, OWNER. AND/OR HIS
for a new Water line.
Thompson made a motion to recommend approval. Frady
seconded the motion. All ayes, no nayes, mot:.on
carried.
b. Consider proposed Water Line Pro Rata Agreement
with WINDSOR WEST ADGITUN W.H. SMITIl OWNER AND/OR
HIS ASSIGN .
Motion was made by Ccomes. Boyd seconded the motion.
All ayes, no nayes, motion tarried.
co Consider Participation cost (CERTIFICATE OF FINAL
COST) for Water Line and ewer Line Oversize
Agreement, MEADOWS MOBILE HOME PARK, HOLIGAN
DEVHLOPMRNT-INC.
Thompson made motion. Motion was seconded by Frady.
All ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
d. , Consider Final Payment CIP Project 8S-S-9 WOODROW
LANE SEWER, '10-~ES1-(TS CONSTRUCTION in the Amount
o~'-$TTITi330.
Coomes made motion. Boyd seconded motion. All ayes,
no nayes, motion carried.
e. Consider Final I'a ment, CIP Project 85-WP-6 HIGH
SERVICE PUMP 03M[A N '10 RED RIVER CONSTRUCTM
IN THE OUNT OF $42j,515-
Thompson made motion. Seconded by Frady. All ayes,
no nayes, motion carried,
DATE: 9125/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svenla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: SALE OF TRANSFORMER
RECOMMENATION: We recommend that this transformer, that has not been in use
for sometime, be sold to Ohio Transformer Corporatiot. of Lousiville, Ohio for the
sum of $209000.00.
SUMMARY: This is a transformer that has been out of service for some time.
VS_Wiave.advertised and asked for bid/proposals several times. Up until now we
have not received an offer that could be considered. We have talked to Ohio
Transformer Corporation and have received a Purchase Order offer of $20,000.00.
We however agree to sell only as is where is and loaded on the truck or freight
car by the purchaser, or at his expense. We also propose to have the transformer
paid for in full before it is picked up or moved in any way. This offer is the
only one we have received that is acceptable, This sale is in agreement with
Mr. Ernie Tullos o: the Utility Department
BACKGROUND: Purchase Order
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
FISCAL IMPACT:
Re ectf fly su it ed:
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
Prepared by:
e:,, n Msrahsll, C.P.M.
c"fitle. Purchasing Agent
Approved:
"e 1151(
o Marshall, C.P.M.
'P`iles urchasing Agent
ZRA MOM
PURCHMI ORDER NUMBER
r/
0776 CONSTITUTION AVENUE UE
P.O.saxIYI 3198'- 9~
E ! r E THESE NUMIERS MUST APPEAR
F 4 LOUISVILLE, OHIO 44641 ON Att INVOICES, SHIPPING
r r TELEPHONE: 216 -871.3333 PAPEAS.PACKAGES,AND
TELEX: 983472 OHIO TRANS LSVI All CORRESPONDENCE.
TO City of Denton-Purchasing Dept, H OT P-U at Y
901-B Texas St, P 1701 Spencer Rd.
T
Denton, TX 76201 0
i
DATE ORDER DATE REQUIRED CONFIRMING SHIP VIA
9-17-85 10-4-85 ® TO John Marshall OTC
TERMS rA~x 111141.11 ADD µ MARK SHIPMENT DELIVERY iERMS: ny NO FRT. Negotiable F.OB. ik 'El' ALLOW ❑ Fx]
w y
t; r , ♦ 1 ` ; iCMIK :r•1.6' .f, R{'i A~:11. lII!
1 1 'EA General Electric SerfC660407 10/12.5 MVA 3¢ 20,000100
oil transformer 67,000V, delta Pri, w/t gips Loaded
131200Y/7620 V. Sec, w/OTC t10% _ As isl
Class OA/FA-T; 54% iOtal,Wt-95,40011 I
I /~rrSL' '~L •3r,'1'.~' >~S n;~ lr;t r 42sgw I
Pruchaseagr~em t is conditional oa our,,customer
issueing by ct, 18, 1985, a lettel'of cr dit
-s:, -
to purcnoWiiff,tMfa I~ ; I
Denton"COUncll to meet 10%1/85 to determlr e
]
intent dr,;~~n~t a> abo a price;.`' I
;era ,r
I
I
I
T-1
lItPIJCTI0I`JS r,~„E :A,t OHI TRAN 0 ER C RPORATION
M.v D4!RIV WJ♦LM'u,~yb^A.
1+ n]H,vC+ryrS 1O U411 &',C 0~+OY -19 il SEE RE.109 SM UTHOR1IED SIGNATURE
VENDOR COPY
a;; . s^o.. fir,' _ , f. u a ra, ;:e ;y .
DATBt 10/01/85
0In COUNIM WORT FOW. T
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager ,
SUBJBCTt Y-24
4COMMSNDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Y-24 at its
August 14, 1985, meeting by a vote of 5 to 0.
SUMMARY:
This is the petition of Jame and Marguerite Stauver requesting a
variance of Article 4.09 of the City of Denton Subdivision and Land
Development Regulations. The article details the requirements for
the extension of water and sewer lines across the full width of a
lot. In addition, Articles 4.07 and 4.08 require that water and
sewer lines be sufficient for domestic use and conform to the ltnster
Plan ''or the City.
BACKOROUNDt
The property is located at the eouthweut corner of Crescent and
Bolivar Streets and has 200 feet of frontage on Crescent Street. The
variance would eliminate the requirement for extending a six inch
water line along the 200 feet of lot frontage and a six inch sewer
line along the frontage of Lot 2, Block 1.
PROGRAMS. DBPARTMRNTS OR GROUPS AFFSCTRD:
The Utilities Department, Planning and Development Department, and
the general public are affected. Four (4) property owners within 200
feet were mailed notices of the public hearing.
FISCAL IMPACTt
If the variance is approved, the general public would be required to
pay for any improvements.
Re Q. y eu itt
Q
Rick Svehla
Prepared byt Acting City Manager
-Cit.
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Appro d:
Jeff Msye
Director of Planning
and Development
1283a
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMITRY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October It 1985
SUBJECT: V-24. This is the petition of James and Marguerite Stauvnr
requesting a variance of Article 4.09 of the City of Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The article
details with the requirements for the extension of water
and sewer lines across the full width of a lot. In
addition, 1trticles 4.07 and 4.03 require that water and
sewer lines be sufficient for domestic use ant! c>nform to
the master Man for the City.
SUMMARY: The proj~orty is located at the southwest corner of crescent
and Bolivar Streets and has 200 feet of frontage on
Crescent Street. The requested variance would eliminate
the requirement for extending a six inch water and a six
inch sewer line along the frontage of Lot 2, Blot:k 1 on
Crescent Street.
Variations and modifications of the requirements of the
Denton Subdivision and Land Development aejulatfons are
discussed in Article I, Chapter III and states in part that
in no case shall the commission or council grant
modifications unless it finds that all of the following
conditions are catiefieds
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city master
plane.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result In an
extreme hardship for the development of the subdivision.
34 Granting of a modification will not have the effect of
preventing the orderly subdivision of other Iend use in
the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent of
the standard.
5. The problem in question is not generally commcn to other
properties in the city. If the problem standerd in
question is of general application to numerous
properties hhroughout the city, then the Planning and
Zoning Commission is prohibited from granting such
variance, but should instead recommend an ordinance
change to the City Council.
6. The actual pecuniary cost of development of the property
shall be considered for modification of standards.
7. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to the
property itself as distinguished from a hardship
relating to convenience.
8. The hardship must not result from the applicant's or
proposed property owner's own actiono.
If the City Council concludes that the eight conditions as
specified in the subdivision regulations are met, a majority
of affirmative votes is required to grant the variance.
(r4• ' k't f 1 ~ ~
Cik~ Council Beck-up summery Sheet
October 1, 1985
Paige 2
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny the request for variance
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the
variance be denied and improvements be required at its
August 14, 1985 meeting by a vote of 5 to 0.
ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny the request for variance
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced plat
2. Memorandum from Utility Department
3. Minutes of the October 16, 1984 Development Review
Committee meeting
44 City Council Back-up for Stauver Addition
5. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
of August 14, 1985
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
0947a
LOCUTION MAP
F t ~ SDOO
• J
orr~:our :rtouc }y ~ 4
CA►` ` I t fi NOTES 1. cowoulk WAS INIUMARo
Mo rODWf4c ► ,r"cn rc or M~Lo
e I Q Ili
5
CRES[CIVT tRCCT In so ~t o w ~ I t rrr its, /ul UAW
t AIDNG NS MINI? .W NO r7' LWCr
mow.
In
~
Coll yI 1ss> `O/'~t Ae,~ Lw m -O.t1! Ac,
ru, r ear ADEN, 1OT I LOT t C
WI a at ' BLOCK r I c+b 4 C
> > r
Z \ y 'Q
cA.,rsS +o rro 0 C
ur1 roo \c
1 ` 1
I WALTt E IKAYFIr LO Ip
f y+ t F tONr
V T
rM-Nt16 „may
pt foot
Y. 1. Iilr U:.'r Llrlr r r',rN ELM
11Y11•r; hk.y Kl, 1 yc>fot.lYl
~__.w..........--~ REVISED
5TAUV(g ADD.
F a
CITY Of DENTON
q U71L171 M2M0RANDUM
rrrrrrrrr rr r..rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.....rrrrrwr..rrrwrrrrrr rrrr rrrrrr..rrrrr r
T0s Planning & Zonirg Commission
ATTNi David Ellison, Planning & Ccmmiunity Development
FROMs Ray RUMfield, Civil Engineer, Water/Wastewater
DAM August 81 1985
SUBJECTt Variance on Stauver Addition for August 14, 1985 p & Z Meeting
The Utilities Department opposes this variance request because this is
not a special or peculiar factor or condition and does affect the
general application and spirit of the rules and regulations of the
subdivision regulations. This is not a single family rosidence applying
for utility service. The developers of Stauver Addition ire proposing a
duplex addition as a business venture and as such should be subject to
the same regulations governing all other commercial developers in the
City of Denton. It is the policy of the Utilities Department that water
and sanitary sewer lires be extended along roadways or streets thereby
making access to utilities available to other developments in the same
area. The Utilities Department through the Development Review Committee
recommonded that water and sewer be extended along the frontage of
Stauver Addition in Crescent Street right-of-way. The estimated cost of
utility extension is approximately $5,183.00# $2,625.00 for water (210
LF X $12.50 LF) and $2,558.00 for sewer (155 LF X $16.50 LF). Cost of
utilities are, therefore, in line with overall estimated costs, $5,183 -j-
$170,000.00 estimated cost of 2 duplexes a 2.9% of estimated total cost.
The developere of Stauver Addition want to extend water and sewer from
Lot 2 to Lot 1 in opposition to City policy outlined above.
For these reasons the Utilities Department recommends de.slal of this
request for variance.
RR#gb
cY1''1t' Ot De"ON r
~ 81'~Dlt~?EO 1
p 14
CL
SUBJECT
Lq
~(,+Z C _ LL~L 1. C
Lett C t- l f C 1,
I AA
r
ORC minutes
Review al JL~
t. N1LNN flimps laN acccer. ~aMtcn
40 Ap-&i 41 C~ -1 awe.
ww ur o~.
76 ,1.
UILA
Z _ d to
C6rut1~-cf t~ ~tb t~ia c.~a..1:
t3b Coat
d 1. -
t 77
'
~e.'Lc.t.l~at 6Y __T1L_4 ~'L t.p ,
9.
9.
10.
I
CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHRET
MEETING DATE: February S, 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Stauver
Addition, Black 1
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.427 acres situated south of
and abutting crescent Street and west of botivar
Street and shown in the R. Beaumont Survey,
Abstract #Al1, City of Denton. This site le
zone' reel.detial two family (2-F) and the plat
establishes two family lots.
The minimum lot size for a 2-F lot is 6,000
square feet with a minimum lot depth of 100 feet
and minimum lot width of 60 feet. Both lots
exceed the minimum area and lot width require-
ments, but fall short by 7 feet on the minimum
lot depth requirement. The developer has
requested a variance of the minimum lot depth
requirement. Water, sanitary sewer, telephone,
gas and electrical services and facilities are
adequate and available.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat of Stauver
Addition, Block 1.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
Harry ersaud
Development Review Planner
0601e
Minutes
Development Review Committee
October 16, 1984
DRC Members Presenti Jerry Clark, David Ham, Wayne Horsley, Don
McLaughlin, Koorosh Olyai, Robert Hagemann,
Tommy Stone, Texx Stewart, David Ellison, Harry
Persaud, David Salmon, Robbie Baughman and Ray
Rumfield.
Engineer, Planner,
Architect, Surveyor,
or other development
interests presents Charles Watkins
II. Review of Concept Preliminary Repiat of Stauver Addition
A. Engineering
1. Meets preliminary plat checklist.
2. 40 cfs going down Bolivar - see if street capacity is
okay, no effect to duplex.
3. Both streets are in the City standards, right-of-ways
are okay.
4. Right-of-way off-set dons not effect street?
5. How will this site be served with sewer and water?
B. Transportation Engineering
Please refer to Engineering comment section.
C. Water and Sewer
1. Require 6" water line on Bolivar with gate valves at
each end tied into existing 4" water line. Construc-
tion drawings will be needed at the time of final
platting.
2. Need flow test at fire hydrant on Bolivar
approximately 250' north of Crescent Street.
3. No pro rata charges are requited.
4. No oversize agreement is necessary.
5. Need to se+, conference with owner and Robbie Baughman,
Building Inspector.
D. Electric
Service available, detail to be worked out with building
plans.
} 1 4 { R.., 7 ;F.
Ninutea
Development Review Committee
Stauver Addition
October 16, 1984
Page 2
E. Fire
'No camsants at this time.
F. Building Inspection
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission will have to vary
lot depth requirements.
2. As dicussed in the Development Review Committee
meeting, this department is concerned about the
proposed water line serving lot 1 to be installed,
across lot 2.
G• Lone Star Gas
Gas service is available.
H. G.T.E.
Service is available.
I. Cox Cable
No representative was present. ,
J. Solid Waste
1. Residential solid waste service is available.
2. The City ordinance requires that all single family
mite be served by the City's Sanitation Division.
3. We will provide twice-a-week curb service, and
collection of bulk trash once a week.
4. All garbage must he placed in plastic bags or small
boxes. Customers will be billed on their utility bill.
K. Parks and Recreation
Area is not served by existing neighborhood park.
L. Planning and Community Development
1. Lot depth issue is one that staff can support.
2. Major technical concern is water line problem.
P $ Z Minutes
August 14, 1985
Page 4
E. V-24. Petition of James and Marguerite Stauver reyt-esting
a Wariance of Articles 4.07 and 4.08 of the City of Denton
Subdivision and Land Developmen►. Regulations which require
(UNAPPROVED) that water and sewer lines be sufficient for domestic use
and conform with the master plans f(-, the city. The tract
is 0.427 acres and located at the sc.ithwest corner of
Crescent and Bolivar Streets. The tract is described as
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, of the Stauver Addition and shown
in the BaB $ GRR Company Survey, Abstract No. 185. The
property is zoned two-family.
Four notices were mailed to adjacent property owners;
no reply forms were received in favor or In opposition.
Ms. Carsor explained that there are existing water and
sewer lines in Bolivar Street, that subdivision regula-
tions require extension, across frontage of both lots,
approximately 200 feet along Crescent Street. She said
at oresent time there is a residence on lot 1 that does
have water, that it was intention of developer to tap
onto existing line on lot 2 and go to lot 1, that staff
has numerous problems with that.
PETITIONER: Greg Edwards engineer, advised that if
al!15U6 request is denied sewer line would not have to
be extended all the way across lot 1, that subdivision
regulations allow just to lot line if properties farther
away cannot be logically served; water line would have to
bo extended across frontage of both lots. lie said staff's
policy is extension of lines for future development in the
same area, which policy he supports. Ile pointed out that
structures directly across the street are served from
Bolivar, that properties along Anna are served by water
and sewer from Anna. All surrounding properties are
served with water and sewer and he doesn't see :tow approv-
ing this request would inhibit other developers. Ile said
that Mr. Stauver is proposing to keep existing residence
on lot 2 and build a two family structure on lot 1. He
noted staff's estimate of cost of 2.9 percent of proposed
development and stated that it woul' actually be double
that since only one structure will be built. Ile also
pointed out that cost for a small job is more than for a
larger subdivision. They feel that cost of running public
sewer and public; water to serve this two family lot is a
substantial amount of cost of total develop went, city is
going to be inheriting maintenance on 250 feet of new line
and they don't see putting in public facilities to serve
this one two family residence,
Chairman asked what if developer sold lot and Mr, Edwards
answered they can dedicate a private easement along lot
2. He said that instead of running a 6" line, they pro-
pose coming in with a 3/4 to 1 inch service line.
i
P Z Minutes
August 14, 1985
Page 5
Jim Stauver, owner, stated that two trees which increase
value of property would be destroyed by putting new line
in. lie said that property directly across street was
served in same manner he is requesting about two years
ago and he doesn't see any physical problemv.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson continued staff report stating
that as c regulations were addressed at time the prelimi-
nary plat was approved, that Utility Department did ask
that water and sewer lines be extended. She said that
Building Inspection had indicated that a request to tap
onto existing lines would require a 16' easement plus a
variance from Plumbing Code Board which is highly unlikely.
She said that subdivision regulations require twat eight
conditions be met before Commission can grant a varaince
that Developpment Review Committee does not feel all cond?,-
tions have been met and recommends denial.
Mr. Rumfield stated that Utility Department opposes lines
not being put in right-of-way as lines would then be pri-
vate. lie said there i,, no guarantee that lot will not be
sold leaving the city with no access. Ile added that the
city wants the privilege of looping water line over to
next street to control pressure at some future date.
Chairman asked if developer gives a private easement on
lot 2 and if there was a break, then wouldn't the city
have the right to go in and repair? Mr. Rumfield said
that if city did not have a contract and if property sold,
then city would not necessarily have that right, that is
why city wants a dedicated line.
Ms. Carson advised that new line would be in street and
would not affect existing trees.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Edwards repeated that cost to put lines
underneath the paved street for a small development would
be very extensive. lie said he didn't think there would be
any question that if a private easement across lot 2 was
dedicated that owner of lot 1 would not have continued
right to use that facility.
Public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Claiborne stated that he realizes this
3`§q`6-§ bly a hardship on developer but given the eight
criteria that must be met before a variance can be ap-
proved, he cannot support the request. lie moved to deny
V-24. Mr. Escue seconded the motion stating that city
master plan should be conformed to. Vote was called and
motion carried unanimously (5-0).
DATE: 10-1-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT rQJ(KAT `
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUPI'SGT: V-26. THIS IS THE PETITION OF ELBERT HUGHES REQUESTING A VARIANCE
OF ARTICLES 4.03, 4.07, 4.10, 4.150 OF THE CItY OF DENTON
SUBDIVISION AND LAND DRVRLOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE ARTICLES DETAIL
REQUIREMENTS FOR DRAINAGE STANDARDS, RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET PAVING
STANDARDS, SEPTIC TANK PERMITTING STANDARDS, AND MINIMUM WATERLINE
SIZE AND FIRS HYDRANT SPACING STANDARDS.
MCOMMSND TION:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommended that the variances be
denied and improvements be required at their September 11, 1985,
meeting by a vote of 6-0.
SUMMARY:
Mr. Hughes has requested a variance of drainage improvements, septic
tank permitting standarde, minimum waterline size standards, minimum
fire hydrant spacing requirements, and right-of-way and perimeter
street paving standards.
DACKGROUN%
The Development Review Committee and the Engineering Department
reviLved the varlanco request and nonoluded that the improvements
should be made.
RROGRAMS. DEP6 MENTS OR GROUPS 0_LFf8CTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There 1s no impact on the general fund
l Rink Svehla
Prepared by: Acting City Manager
Del',Lse Spivey
Urban Planner
App v
Jeft Me
Director of Planning
and Developd*nt
1346g/3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETINP DATE: OctobAr 1, 1985
SUBJECT: Y-26. This is the petition of Elbert Hughes requesting a
variance of Article 4.03 of the City of Denton Subdivision
and Land Development Regulations. The article details right-
of-way and street paving standards.
SUMMARY: Variations and modifications of the requirements of the Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations are discussed in
Article I, Chapter III and states in part that in no case shall
the commission or council grant modifications unless it finds
that all of the following conditions are satisfied:
1. The modified proposal woula conform to the city master plans.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result in an extreme
hardship for the development of the subdivision.
:i. Granting of a modification will not have the effect of
preventing the orderly subdivision of other land use in
the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent of the
standard.
5. The problem in question is not generally common to other
properties in the city. If the problem standard in question
is of general application to numerous properties throughout
the city, then the Planning and Zoning Commission is pro-
hibited from granting such variance, but should instead
recommend an ordinance change to the City Council.
6. The actual pecuniary cost of development of the property
shall be considered for modification of standards.
7. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to the
property itself as distinguished from a hardship relating
to convenience.
8. The hardship must not result from the applicant's or proposed
property owner's uwn actions.
If the City Council concludes what the eight conditions as
specified in the subdivision regulations are met, a majority
of affirmative votes is required to grant the variance.
A memorandum from Jerry Clark, City Engineer, describing the
cost and effect of the improvements is attached.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny the request for variance
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the
variance be den.. id improvements be required at its
meeting of Septemt._r I1, 1985 by a vote of 6-01,
ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny the request for variance
ATTACHMENTS: 1, Reduced plat
2. N,emorandum
3. Minutes
Tie se p ey, rail-F nl7 erg "
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: V-26. This is the petition of Elbert Hughes requesting a
v`arTance of Article 4.07 ;,f the City of Denton Subdivision
and Land Development Regulations. The article details minimum
waterline size and minimum fire hydrant spacing requirements.
SUMMARY: Variations and mo4ifications of the requirements of the Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations are discussed in
Article I, Chapter III and states in part that in no case shall
the commission or cok.ncil grant modifications unless it finds
that all of the following conditions are satisfied:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city master plans.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result in an extreme
hardship for the development of the subdivision.
3. Granting of a modification will not have the effect of
preventing the orderly subdivision of other land use in
the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent of the
standard.
5. The problem in question is not generally common to ether
properties in the city. If the problem standard in question
is of general application to numerous properties throughout
the city, then the Planning and Zoning Commissior: is pro-
hibited from grenting such variance, but should instead
recommend an ordinance cha,ige to the City Council.
6. The actual pecuniary cost of development of the property
shall be considered for modification of standards.
7. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to the
property itself as distinguished from a hardship relating
to convenience.
8. The hardship must not result from the applicant's or proposed
property owner's own actions.
If the City Council concludes that the eight conditions as
specified in the subdivision regulations ai-e met, a majority
of affirmative votes is required to grant the variance.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny the request for variance
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the
variance be denied and improvements be required at is
meeting of September 11, 1985 by a vote of l;M4
ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny the request for variance
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced plat
2. Minuteo.',aa
`
ITEenise Sp"ive UrDannYlanner
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMKIRY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: Y-26. This is the petition of Elbert Hughes requesting a
va ante of Article 4.10 of the City of Denton Subdivision
and Land Development Regulations. The article details septic
tank permitting criteria.
SUMMARY: Variations and modifications of the requirements of the Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations are discussed in
Article I, Chapter III and stares in part that in no case shall
the commission or council grant modifications unless it finds
that all of the following conditions are satisfied:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city master plans.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result in an extreme
hardship for the development of the subdivision.
3. Granting of a modification will not have the effert of
preventing the orderly subdivision of other land use in
the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spit-it and intent of the
standard.
5. The problem in question is not generally common to other
properties in the city. If the problem standard in question
is of general application to numerous properties throughout
the city, then the Planning and Zoning Commission is pro-
hibited from granting such variance, but should instead
recommend an ordinance change to the City Council.
6. The actual pecuniary cost or development of the property
shall be considered for modification of standards.
1. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to the
property itself as distinguished from a hardship relating ,
to convenience.
8. The hardship must not result from the applicant's or proposed
property owner's own actions.
If the City Council concludes that the eight conditions as
specified in the subdivision regulations are inet, a majority
of affirmative votes is required to grant the variance.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve ur deny the request for variance
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Conraission recommnded that the
varitince be denied and improvements be required at its
meeting of September 11, 1985 by a vote of 6~•0,
ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny the request for variance
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced plat
2. Minutes 'wn
x . 14t t4^.s.•
ue nise bplveyr urban Planner
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: V-26. This is the petition of Elbert Hughes requesting a
vva ance of Article 4.15 of the City of Denton Subdivision
and Land Development Regulations. The article details drainage
standards and requirements.
SUMMARY: Variations and modifications of the requirements of the Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations are discussed in
Article I, Chapter III and states in part that in no case shall
the commission or council grant modifications unless it finds
that all of the following conditions are satisfied:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city master plans. 1
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result in an extreme
hardship for the development of the subdivision.
3. Granting of a modification will not have the effect of
preventing the orderly subdivision of other land use in
the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent of the
standard.
5. The problem in question is not ge.ierally common to other
properties in the city. If the problem standard in question
is of general application to numerous properties throughout
the city, then the Planning and Zoning Commission is pro-
hibited from grcnting such variance, but should instead
reconnend an ordinance change to the City Council.
6. The actual pecuniary cost of development of the property
shall be considered for modification of standards.
7. The oardship must be a physical hardship relating to the
property itself as distinguished from a hardship relating
to convenience.
8. The harlchip must not result from the applicant's or proposed
property ;whet s own actions.
If the City Council concludes that the eight conditions as
specified in the subdivision regulations are met, a majority
of affirmative votes is required to grant the variance.
A memorandum from Jerry Clark, City Engineer, describing the
cost and effect of the improvements is attached.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny the request for variance
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the
at its
by n a s vote required
Sedenied ptember n 11, 1985 Improvements
meeting variance of be
ofu 6-0,
ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny the request for variance
ATTACHMENTS: 2, RMemorandumat
3, Minutes
venise'Sj3~Y~ Urban YTannerr
J .N V~ I LS
•IO+ttl
"got
Iew10, Y ,
FBI" 1 ` 61.1106'6 C[NTIERLINE CUM DATA
S_ M. WOf10'[.
CW11R { A T L t`
1,111 AC. I 4Y6 tt 100.0 I{{.tT i/{11 ! in OAt{ OR 5411 600.0 Is$,1 106A0
6 aclss 101 0.04 17.11 61 J
t 1~1• 4116 F //I / SIY{W
11. I a 1 0'-
a 1 1113 oil
1~ w ALL IIOAO AII[ {d 41014T CI WAY. '
ALL CVL• •SAC6 AAt 40' RAM.
I
! I
lot Nr►/N1 1 1.716 1 15 l'~~' f II• 1
INI M V
we I
r;
mks
J
l p11VIN / lYKV1 I y
I T 1,116, Ita.n.
1 Yon two , . rN a n.
h1N0 Ybc.d t....... l..Ykr
6 t oeo V.W MNN.16~ Y,INIII
~1 ~I~---.+• twwiy q IYO/N-I,/ry. U • ~ ~ J be a Ali
I- led FrN `1.71 f `Lao is .d~ ~w, . NI . .I AN oil WARM
` r
two /MIIpY 00111 III 6N41 1. M 1.41 NH
N 11161Y / 01/.X,1, I..V.,MM00.NNot 1/ me*" 40
00, pop IN/1110 I ~ so .Y
4 AL /4.11
~,pop AA
6 1.
4 C -i T
A 'e! I
to, 'it
see. L
no/in 11
Nuw ■ At
1 SN 6'
a too .14 Ac 1 WWII FIRW10
t INN ( IN.N If Nltl
C 1 M 1 A,- lolls .44 Opp L . 1► ,1.611 AE iQl C6/Ct .V AMk
.1f6AC, 1.N 1 lilt{AG sp~~~ IfsiAl!•.1
1 J wN iFTZ vAl Ir.hV NI. M
1 11 1 f/ ,.Q,~,b / 0 hl IQ . 1
11 p it Y~NI i. * ~
, 08, C. 6/NMN, bits 11701 y •
1 r11f'If li't Il ` .
1 L J
t 4 N it
i, its Ac t1f 1G /6 Ad~1.. NM'1+t
Itfl Kel `1 11' of
N1 /1N
Ova
oNz;g •J♦ CNIII Cloploom N IM 14060
Ill IIMN, ttat total
` Y r, ,
9L~ ~f w ~l./11 A4 Via ~ .
y' 1. ICn,CIN111 BIN
A t6' 000I (114.1 1 / WTI IL 114
t 6~IV1~~61 • i 1{orA{Ol 6 A1000 ATi . X
.YI .1N YpM rN~I
nlllbl Rlul NA
- 666
AEI. 7d • /-4A 2
CITYo/DE14TON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566.840
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September S. 1985
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Variances on right-of-way, street paving and drainage
improvements for Oak Ridge Estates.
1. By not putting any facilities that will address streets or
drainage, this subdivision will be a future constriction.
Both traffic and drainage will have difficulty flawing
through without experiencing some design probloins. A
collector street is needed in the area but was not
addressed by the developer.
2. Literal enforcement of the ordinance is what the City of
Denton intended when it extended its subdivision
regulations out into the ETJ. These regulations were
available to this developer and the county during the pre-
development stages. This commission can't let too many
subdivisions of this site through without losing total
legal control of its ETJ.
3. Granting these variances will create design and functional
problems for future developments around the area. When
collector streets and drainage channels are ignored instead
of being addressed, the potential owners as well as future
neighbors are put into possible endangerment. Flooding,
emergency access, ingress-egress in the future have become
City of Denton responsibilities when they are taken into
the City after platting has occurred. Other City services
such as solid waste and utilities are greatly effected by
street design and construction problems.
4. Since no alternative soitttions except the bare minimums
shown have been presented, the City can make no judgement.
It seems that cost versus proper service levels for the
future seem to be the main issues
Page 2 of 2 pages
5. The property if, very common with others throughout the
ETJ. It has st~me drainage improvement needs, some road
needs and a fairly average topography for the area around
Denton.
6. The developer is the only one capable cf determining profit
required for construction to occur.
7. As stated in NS the ppropertyy has no ma or physical
problems that are ou! of linewith other properties.
8. The property ^wners decision to develop now in our ETJ
without considering our standards seems to be a self
created problem.
The above reflects the Public Works Department's opinion of the
variances being requested, None seem to have any merit other
than cost of development for the developer, Quality
development as per the ETJ regulations should be our goal.
Sincerely,
i
Jerry &a.rk P.E.
City Engineer
sr
10304E
P Z Minutes
September 11, 1985
Page 2
V-26. Petition of Elbert Hughes requesting variances of the
T -o Towing articles of the City of Denton Subdivision and Land
Development Regulations;
(UNAPPROVED) 1. Artcllest4.03 - andardconcerning right-of-way and street
paving 2. Article 4.15 - concerning drainage standards and
requirements.
3. Article 4.07 - concerning minimum waterline size
and minimum fire hydrant spacing.
4. Article 4.10 - concerning criterc for permitting
individual septic tanks.
The property is located east of Wildcat Road, west of Rockhill
Road, and south of FM 426. The property is further described
as a 78.6 acre tract in the C. B. Emmons Survey, Abstract 403.
Eight notices were mailed to adjacent property owners; no
reply forms were received in favor; one reply form was
received in oppositioi., and one reply form received was
undecided.
PETITIONER: Ann Powell, attorney, asked the Ci:y of Denton
eave this 'evelopment alone because the county regulations
l 1i
to
were adequate in this instance. She said that this tract was
too remote for city services including fire and police protec-
tion and that the city had no present plans for annexation.
She said that she was concerned about having concrete channels
and believed that this had been resolved. She said that the
water line and fire hydrant requirements had been resolved by
default because the city would not be supplying services to
this property, She stated that the water line rind services
would be prov'oed by Blackrock out of the Aubrey area. She
said that individual septic tanks would be used and that it
was a matter of convenience for the people who buy the tracts.
She added that the road into this developmoi.t wns going to be
dedicated to the county and should have to abide by the county
since the county was going to maintain the road.
Bud Hauptmann, representative of Fields, Edwards & Associates,
presented estimated cost figures. )le said that the cost of
concrete pavpmant in the channel was not under consideration
anymoro because requirement had been waived. He stated that
to improve with city standards, the cost would be under
$400l-0I to etcostpwouldwhey~undert1200,000, andntooimproveewithh
county standards alone, the cost would be under $100,000.
IN FAVOR: June Middleton, real estate agent from Century 21,
sstafcd-'that she agreed with all other speakers and believed it
would be fitting to have county standards,
OPPOSEDs Hone present,
~T
P $ Z Minutes
September 11, 1985
Page 3
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that he was concerned
W63fff"-,rT&t'ezr'standards and requirements in the extraterritorial
jurisdiction (ETJ). He added that he was concerned about the
integrity of the subdivision regulations. He said that the
purpose of these regulations wns to impose city standards with
some exceptions because if the property is ever annexed it
would be substandard with county regulations. He said if the
variances ara ap roved, the city cannot tell other subdivisions
in ETJ to meet y standards. He added that cost could not
be a justification to approve variances because if granted
because of cost factor, others before and in future will be
treated unfairly, lie also added that the City Council had
decided not to annex this property currently, He noted that
this property was 24,000 Feet from city electricity and one
and one-half miles from the city limits.
Ms, Spivey stated that these are four separate variances
and that they should be treated individually. Ms. Spivey
explair►ed the following articles:
Article 4,03 - refers to street sections that the city
requires put in as to the materials and the depth of those
sections. She added that tke preliminary plat was approved
on a conditional basis that a right-of-way be granted across
the top of the northernmost lot for a future collector street
in that area. The petitioner is requesting a variance of
granting that right-of-way for the future collector street
and also a variance of having to comply with city speci.itca-
tions for the depth and construction of streets. She added
that they wish to comply with county standards.
Article 4.07 - Ms. Spivey said this could be addressed by
Ray Rumfield if the commission had any questions.
Article 4.10 - Ms. Spivey otated that the subdivision
regulations require a percolation test on each lot in
subdivision whereas the county does not require this.
She added that the petitioner feels that the county is
sufficient for percolation tests and issuing septic tank
permits.
Article 4,15 - She said that originally it was thought that
the petitioner would have to put in a concrete lined channel
and based on discussion with the Development Review Committee
and Eng sneering De artment, it has been determined that it
would be permissible to use an earthlined channel. She stated
that this particular variance would riot be required.
Ms, Spivey stated that they have reviewed all these variances
and that staff recommends denial.
77 -7,
p g z Minutes
September 11, 198S
Page 4
Mr. Juren asked about the items discussed in the Development
Revieu Committee meeting. Ms. Spivey stated that Article 4.15
was discussed and that the staff and engineering department
felt that it was faasible to allow an earthlined channel in-
stead of a concrete channel. Mr. Juren asked if they were
still living up to the standards on this article, Ms. Spivey
replied ye:,. Mr. Juren asked if they were now asking for a
variance of Article 4.1S and Ms. Spivey replied no.
Mr. Claiborne asked what kind of sewer system was proposed as
a result of Article 4.10. Ms. Spivey said the problem was not
witi, the sewer system itself bra with the method of testing.
She added that the subdivision, regulations require a percola-
tion test on every lot wherers the county does not. She
said that the petitioner believes the county is complete.
Mr. Claiborne asked how far al.art and hoa deep were the
testis taken. Mr. Hauptmann replied four fret apart and that
the depth depended or, the soil. Mr. Claiborne asked about
the cost and what happened it tests were unsatisfactory.
Mr. itauptmann repliei: that costs varied and that the county
would require more tests if results were unsatisfactory.
REBUTTAL: Ms. Powell said that at the; time an individual
uys a ot, the county will require nev percolation tests
and the size of the house will determit~e the lateral lines.
She stated that she believes that this tract of land is
appropriate for the variances because it is so remote.
Public hearing closed.
DECISION- Ms. Brock moved to deny V-26; Mr Claiborne seconded
an t was unanimously carried (6-0).
r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURC OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials,
equipment supplies or services in accordance with the procedures
of state ~aw and City ordinances; and
'WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "aid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
laterials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$10,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every
act of the Council providin,; for the expenditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW9 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the numbered items in this following numbered bids for
materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid
Proposals" attachad herccoI are hereby accepted and approved as
being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BID NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
9519 1 Alamo Transformer $ 9,300.00
9519 2 Foleline 11,415.00
9519 3 Dusenberry $ 24,t20.00
9519' 4 Dusenberry S,iiO.D0
9519 5 Polsline $ 28,340.00
9519 6 Alamo Transformer $ 10,330.00
9519 7 Dusenberry $ 3,238.00
9522 1.4 Temple $ 26,171.00
9322 3 Poleliae $ 41,040.00
9332 ALL ^.o!Jos Aabulaace Sales 6 $ 38,643.U0
Se►7Lce
PAGE 1
SECTION II.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bide for such items and agrees to purchase
the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with
the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the
specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals,
and related documents.
SECTION III.
That should the City and pereovs submitting approved and
accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval,
and awarding of the bide, the City Manager or his designated
representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract
which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract
is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications,
standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid
Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and acs pted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the
expenditure of foinds therefor in the avount and in accordance with
the approved bids or pursuant to a vx1tten contract made pursuant
thereto ac authorized herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this _ I day of octoba , 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWARTO RXM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST :
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE 2
i
DATE: 9/25185
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9519 Distribution Transformers
RECOMMENDATION: we recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest
evaluated bidder for each item:
1. 15pc 50 KVA CONV to Alamo Transformer at 620.00ea 9,300.00
2. 15pc 50 KVA CSP to Poleline at 761.00ea -11,415.00
3. 20pc 75 KVA CSP to Dusenberry at1231.00ea 24,620.00
4. 10pc 75 KVA CONY to Dusenberry at 889.00ea - 8,890.00
5. 20pc 100 KVA CSP to Poleline at1417.00ea -28,340.00
6. 10pc 100 KVA CONV to Alamo Transformer at1035,00ea =10,350.00
7. 3pc 167 KVA,CONV to Dusenberry at1746.00ea 5,238.00
Total bid award $98,153.00
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of Electric Distribution
polemount transformers. The quantities are estimated to last 90
days and are sufficient to replace normal stocking requirements.
8,6CKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUP AFFECTED: Electric Distribution
FISCAL IMPACT: 1985/86 Budget Fund3
Account f 611-008-0252-9222
R spec uily sub 'tted:
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
repared by:
Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M
Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
M a s l l$ ~C~ .
~c ing Agent
lu 1~ AS19
,
ID -.TRANSFORMERS
f
EN Veptesber 19, 1985 2100 PRIESTER ALAMO SAN ANGEL TEMPLE CUMMINS VAN TRAM DUSEN- VZSCO POLE- TEMPLE
ELECTRIC BERRY LINE
COUNT 1 611-008-0252-9222
EH DESCRIPTIMT- - WOW R WER01t
1. 15 50 KVA CONV _i 806.00 620.00 151.00 688.00 VENDOR-
666.00 853.00 694.00 700.00 732.00 831.00
SP 812.00 838.00 781.00 821.00 981.00 763.00 748.00 161.0 837.00
S KVA CSP 1160.00 1388.00 1243.00 280.00 1426.00 1231.00 1088.00 1018.00 1196.00
10 75 RYA CONV 966.00 900.00 1238.00 1103.00 046.00 1258.00 ,89.00 975.00 916.00 995.00
20 100 RYA CSP
`o i4gg.oo 1183.00 1485.00 1
10 100 KVA CONV 1225.00 1035.00 1400.00 1316.00 1210.00'1487.00 1269.00 1127.00 1022.00 1264.00
3_ 167 KVA CONV 1709.00 1625.00 1935.00 1761.00 161.00 _ 1991.00 1746.00 734.00 1698.00 1763.00
DATE: October 1, 1995
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9522 WIRE AND CABLE
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder as listed:
Item 1 to Temple, Inc. at 5299.00/m't for 30,000 ft. _ $ 8,910.00
Item 2 to Temple, Inc. at ;569.00/mft for 5,000 ft = 29845.00
Item 3 to Temple, Inc. at $1144.00/mft for 4,000 ft. = 4,576.00
Item 4 to Temple, Inc. at 5815.00/mft for 12,000 ft. a 9,780.00
Item 5 to Poleline, Inc. at 5513.00/mft for 80,000 ft. 41,040.00
- We also recommend Item 5 be awarded to Cummins Supply based
on stock delivery at 5524.00/mft for 80,000 ft. 41,920.00
TOTAL AWARD :109,131.00
Poleline delivery is 90 days after receipt of order
SUMMARY: This purchase is to rep'kace war(:house stock and is estimated
to last from 3 to 6 months. Item 1-4 is for overhead construction
and item 5 is for underground installation.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Warehouse Inventory and Electric Distribution System
FISCAL IMPACT: 1985/86 Working Capital Funds Account Number 710-004-0598-8708
R pect ully s bmt ted:
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
oaared y :
r
Name: Too: 0. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
H J Harshall, C.P.M.
V~fl urchasing Agent
BID f QF99
BID w1RE A CABLE
OPEN_ September 19 ~aR~, PRIESTER MESCO NELSON
SUPPLY ELECTRIC TEMPLE POLELINE CUMMINS
ACCOUNT # SUPPLY
QTY, ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR
VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 30mft Tri 02 VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
lex 365.00 305.00 320.OU 299.00 304.40 301.00
2 5mft Tri lex X12 0
512.00 589.00 609.50 569.00 579.00 573.00
3 4mft uad 1,4 0
1283.82 1180.00 1226.42 1144.00 1165.80 1152,00
4 12mft Seconder 4 0 4 0 2 0
1011,00 840.Q0 814,50 815.00 829.00 822.00
5 8omft URD /2 Concentric
570. fm 569.00 639.45 526.00 513,OJ 524.00
Deliver toc o oc o oc o - _
16 weeks 7 Weeks 60 Days 50-60 Das 90 Days 1 Dayays
DATE: October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Mem`,iers of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: 810 49532 AMBULANCE
RECOMlENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, Collins
Ambulance Sales and Service, in the amount of $51,995.00 with
optional air ride suspension at $41800.00 and au~omatic starting
system at $1,850.00. Total bid package delivered to Denton
is $589645.00.
SUMWIRY: This bid is for the purchase of a new front line ambulance.
The bid prices have been determined by the City of Dallas in
April of 1985 on theer bid number 0841612. They bid 6 units
plus nine units for 1986 delivery. Through an arrangement
with the City of Dallas, Collins Ambulance and the City of
Denton, we are able to "piggyback" their bid. The savings
involved are in excess of $20,000.00 and over 120 days in
delivery time. The bidding process for the City of Dallas meets
or exceeds all legal requirements for the City of Denton. The
cooperative efforts of the two neighboring cities and Collins
Ambulance makes this transaction very advantageous to the
City of Denton. We are very pleased and proud to bring this
pruposal to the Council for your consideration.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Fire Department
FISCAL IMPACT: This purchase will be funded by lease/purchase over a
36 month payout. The actual annual percentage rate is
expected to be below 9%.
Res uliy submitted:
Roared by: Rick Svahla
Acting City Manager
Name Name T:~"om~~hawl .M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
a
o-Te ks
4PurcIa;ingjA en t
t
BID ! 9532
BID AMBULANCE 0841612 COLLINS SUPERIOR SOUThdES'f
AMBULANCE REMOUNT PROFESSION L
OPEN April 23, 1985 City of Dallas
ACCOUNT # Lease/Purchase
# QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 1 Ambulance with Chassis 51 995.00 55 453.G `
repaymen
2 Ambulance without Chassis 52,426.00 56,418,26; 7LJV&L
repaymen
N A
3 Air Ride Suspensio" 41800.00
2.200.00
4 Automatic Starting 1 850.00 1185Q.00
z
t '
i
G~
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD
OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS: PF.dVIDING FOR THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. the C
has competitive bids fora the constructions oaf public received and tabulated
wants in accordance with the procedures of state law and City
ordinaocs; and
received hand recommended the y Manager or a
herein designated described bide employee has
lowest responsible bids fnr the construction of the public works
or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and
plane and specifications therefore; and
WHEREAS, that the City cCouncil3 approvef althe Code of l expenditures n of Ordinances requires
$1000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every
act of the Council providing for tho expenditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW9 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the following competitive bids for the construction of
public works' or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invite-
tions", "Bid Proposals" or plane and specifications attached
hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest
responsible bids:
BID NUMBER COQ CTOR AMOUNT
9445 W.Y. RARRISON 198,166,40
9493 CALVERT PAVIWC $ 115,850.68
9509 BUSINESS ESSENTALS L.10.944.97
10'STORE& $ 56.241.00
9511 G 6_S a_a[m LSTINC S 114.OS4.00
SECTION II.
That the acceptance and ariproval of the above competititva bids
shsil not constitute 4 contract between the City and the person
subm:iting the bid for construction of such public works or
improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall
comply with al), requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders
inc udtnE the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing
of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award
of the bid.
PAVE 1
PAN s y" rf"I
SECTION III.
That the City Manager is hereby authoriied to axcecnte all
necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction
of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids
accepted and approved herein, provided thac such contracts are
made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals,
and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions,
plans and specifications, standards, quantitites and specified
sums contained therein.
SECTION IV.
That upon acceptance and approval o! the above competitive
bids and the execution of contracts for the public v-)rks and
improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts
executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the I day of October , 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON99TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.
PAGE 2
DATE: October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9445 MCKENNA PARK BOOSTER PUMF,
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest responsible
bidder, W.F. Harrison, in the amount of $298,166.40,
SU114ARY: This bid is for the purchase of a high service pump station
to serve the northwest Denton area. The bid 'ncludes the
buildings, purip and all control apparatus associated with
the complete installation.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Water Production Capital Improvements
FISCAL IMPACT: Water & Sewer Bond Account N,jmber 623-008-0460-9101
Work Ordir 7934
Re. ectf ly su i~
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
epored by:
Name: ora D. Saw, .P,M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approind•
ti
*tle n rsha PM.
Purchasing Agent
lU 1_ 9445
11D 1K;KENNA PARK BOOSTER PUMP
" U. F. ONYX BELL C6L DUOPRO RiD RIVER SMITH SA RECISION EPCO LA1NE
>'EN September 12, 1985 2 P.my HARRISON CONST. CONST. CONST. LONST. CONST. PU14P NT POWER IND. B(AILE
CONST
ACCOUNT 1 i
1115M DFSCRT IMION VUFW,t VENDOR -VENDOR VENDOR VEPDOR- VENDOR UNUOR ENDOR IEFWT- VEY R
i 1 Total Including pump _ 298,116.4 345,645. 348,392. 302,900.00 3039390.00 J56,900.00 -
L~24~4U
41,898.00 2 .__,p On1y _ _ 60.300.00 JJA
°v
October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: CHAIRMAN $ MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
FROM: R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities
SUBJECT:
Consider Rid Opening, McKenna Park Booster Pump Station,
Bid #9445,
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September
18, 198S, recommended to the City Council approval of the
lower,t bidder, W. F. Harrison Construction, Arlington,
Texas, in the amount of $298,166.40 for the High Service
Pump Station construction.
The Board also recommends approval of the lowest bidder,
Precision Powered Products, Inc., Housto.i, Texas, for pump
end motor supply in the amount of $38,900.10.
Thu BoE,rd further recommends that the General Contractor,
W. F. Harrison Construction, be authorized to purchase the
pump and motor from the lowest pump bidder, Precision
Powered Products, inc.
SUMMARY
The bids were opened September 12, 1985, and the results
are as follows:
W. F. Harrison Construction, Arlington, Tx 309,166.40
C$L Construction, Temole, Tx 3149000.00
Duopro Constn., Carrolton, Tx 13314,390.00
Lakemont Construction, Conroe, Tx 344,360.00
Onyx Construction, Ft Worth, Tx 13560745.00
Bell Construction, Buffalo, Tx 3590492.00
Red River Censt., Farmers Branch, Tx 368,000,00
Pump $ Motor Only: (2 in number)
Precision Powered Products, Houston, Tx $38,900.00
Smith Pump Co., Hurst, Tx 41,098.00
Jersey Equipment Co., Dallas, Tx 142,463.00
Layne $ Bowler, Memphis, Tenn. $43,690.00
Sepco Industries, Dallas Tx 44,320.00
ASA Hunt, Inc., Dallas, fX 160,300.00
3934U:9
The Public Utilities Board recommends approval of W. F.
Harrison Construction, Arlington, Tx., in the amount of
$2981166.40. All bidders included $S0,000 in their bid for
two pumps and two motors. With the recommended apprroval
of the lowest pump And motor bidder in the amount of
$3809000 the lowest bid for installation will be
$309,266.40 ($50,000 -$38,900) ■ $298,165.40.
BACKGROUND
This is an approved FY 85 CIP project. This project is to
increase pressure and flow for fire protection to the
customers in the northwestern area of the city.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
City of Denton Utilities , supporting departments, and
citizens, contractors.
FICCAL IMPACT
FY 85- currest estimate CIP 85-WP-9 $3000000.00
Actual recommended awari $298,166.40
'source of funds: Water Bonds
623-008-0460-9101-7936
Prepared by. R speced,
Srini Sundaramoorthy c SYRIA
Civil Engineer Acting City Manager
Approv t1 /
e son - - -
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Bid Tabulation
II Minutes PUB Meeting of 9/18/85
III Ordinance
3934U:10
S hn S i
EXCERPT FROM MIAUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
September 18, 1985
C
ONSIDER BID OPENING FOR MCKEmA PARK BOOSrER PUMP,
BID 19445.
Boyd made a motion to recommend two contracts: one
with W.F. Harrison for pump installation, valve
installation and ether wort in the amount of
$259,266.40, the other with Precision Powered
Products for two pumps and motors at $38,900.
Motion seconded by Thompson. All ayes, ILO nayes,
motion carried.
. t Sri ~^q
DATE: October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL '1EPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Menager
SUBJECT: BID #9493 HIGHWAY 380 SANITARY SEWER LINE
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest responsible
bidder, Calvert Paving, in the amount of $115,850.68.
SUNiARY: T i
his bid is for the installation of approximately 5464 feet of
10" pvc sewer pipe with miscellaneous sewer services and
concrete manholes. The work will be completed in seventy-
five days. This project is located on the south side of
Highway 380 and runs west from the intersection of 380 and
135.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PRV d ; - 5, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Capital Improvement Program Water and Sewer Utility
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984/85 Sewer Bond Funds Account #F624-008-0471-9114
Work Order 9957
Re pectf 1]y su ite~~//d:
Rick Svehla
Acting City (tanager
Pared by:
aTo.
D. Shaw, C.P.M. w
title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
' On Marshall,
1e: casng Agf nt
BID 4 9493
BID IRO SANITARY SEWER PAIN
OPTIZ BbB ALYERT D/FW MIDWEST DICKERSON
OPEN` SP,ntemher 17. 1985 -2 -p.m. CONSTRUCT. CONSULT. PAVING UTILITY BRIDGE CONSTRUCT.
CO, CO. CO. CORP. CORP.
ACCOUNT #
QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 Sewer Lot 131,573.36 283 396.0 115 850.68 135 547.20 132,525.80 159,288.00
Add ndums Received 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1& 2 1& 2
Bid and Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes _
q
October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Bid Opening, US 380 Sewerline, FY CIP 8S-S-12, Bid
#9493.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September
18, 1985, recommended to the City Council approval of the
lowest bidder- Calvert Paving Company, Denton, Tx., in the
amount of $1I 5, B SO.68.
SUMM AR Y
The bids were opened September 17, 1985, and the results
are as follows:
Calvert Paving Co., Denton, Tx 115,850.68
Optiz Construction, Oklahoma, 131,573.36
Midway Bridge, Lewisville, Tx 132 525.80
DFW Utility Co., Irving, Tx Y135,547.20
Dickerson Constn., Ceina, Tx $159,288.00
B&B Constn Co., Dallas, Tx $2830396.00
BACKGROUND
This is an approved FY 8S CIP project. This line is
intended to divert sewer flow from 35 and US 380 lift
station to Hickory Creek outfall, thus relieving Vie 10"
sewer line on West University Drive from overloading.
Since the diversion flows by gravity in Hickory Creek
outfall, the operating and maintenance cost of this lift
station will be eliminated.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Municipal Utilities, supporting departments,
citizens, contractors.
I
3S34U:16
FISCAL IMPACT
FY 85 current estimate $1800000.00
Actual recommended award $115,850.68
Source of funds: sewer bonds
624-008-0471-9114-9957
Prepared by: aw11y subs tied,
Srini Sundbramoorthy Rick Sveh"la
Civil Engineer Acting City Manager
App 9ved
6
e s n
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Did Tabulation
II Location Map
III Minutes PUB Meeting of 9/18/85
IV Resolution
3934U:17
S~ x"9,i4 -f ina `~i y, n 5_.'~' rx ^'Y. T 6 !.*.:y~~ .-,;Tin .y.
it
' I.
a
i
I ~
,
.1
l
PROJ EC `
_ T r
hoc-AT=I - , : ~r ;_.a~ ~L
r~~,~ .a
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
September 18, 1985
I
CONSIDER BID OPENING, US 38G +EWERLINEI FY CIP 85-5-129 Bid
The item was presented to the Board by David Ham. Coomes
made a motion to accept the recommended lost bid, second by
Thompson, all ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
I
DATE: 9/25/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and M6,mbers of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehia, Acting City Manager
SUBJECii: BiDO 9509 Modular Furniture
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Business Essentials bidding
the Aspect line in the amount of $110,944.97. This award is for the nurchaue of
the complete system installed as per the specifications and drawings submitced
with the bid.
SUMMARY: This is the bid for panels, wozk surfaces and chairs. We received
rrve Ma. The bid of Stewarts did not qualify as they did not enclose the re-
quired bid bond. The bid of Goldsmith's is on a post and psnel systev and is not
as wdis the intent of the specifications. T;ze specifications call for specific make
and stock numbers with like design, appearance function and level of quality.
Goldsmith requested this Rosemont line to be approved and were given pernission
:o bid bid the Rosemont post and panel system as an alternate.
We then have recommended the lowest bid neeting the specifications and bid requirements
iPCi~ da Essentials. The met the arecifications and bid requirements.
Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMEI(TS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: None
FISCAL _IMPACT: No fiscal impact on the General Fund.
b tt~
Re0fu0.0 su
Rick Svehia
Acting City Manager
Prepared by:
ec n Ma rshall, C.P.M. f
jiMtl; y
: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
.
CL
, Me hn Marshall, f.P.M.y
L11tle• Furchasing Agent
BIU M 9509
PID TITLE MODULAR PANELS 6 FURNITURE BUSINESS GOLDSMITH HAWORTH OFFICE SMARTS
ESSENTIALS FURNITURE OFFICE
OPENED 9/17/85 2;00 pm OF DALLAS SUPPLY
ACCOUNT N
S~~QT_Y.. _ _I11tj DESCRIPTION _ VENDOR _ VENR YENI?OR _ VENDOR -VENV)R--- VENDOR -VENDOR
. _J_ Ut_a~.~e e> ~aa_8h s~L~___. 110,944.97 46,870172 _ 1181277. 13 _ 128. 00.56 98.347.24Y
days ___56 drys 4 2 days 70 des 60 days _
BID BOND yes yes yes yes no
Alternate Post & Panel no yes no no no
J• • r
DATE: 9/24/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
' SUBJECT: BID$ 9510 Participation Hobson Lane / 377 Water Main
RECOMENDATIOMI We recommend this Participation Bid, after review by the
Utility Board, to be approved for the amount $56,241.00 with Jo Storer, Route
I, Box 276, Argyle, Texas 76226. This is the low difference as submitted by
five bidders: See the tabulation sheet.
SUWARY: This H6 was sent out and prepaired by Ifields and Edwards for Jo
Storer. rer. The bid was advertised ua a participation bid, received and opened by
the amity of Denton. The bid was evaluated, finding the low difference of r:
five bidders as shown on the tabulation sheet.
BACK6._.Ol1ND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROWS AFFECTED: Utility Department - Water and Sewer
D v sion.
FIXAL IMPACT: There is ao impact on the General Fund.
R pect ily s it
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
Prepared by:
<ZZ
s~
a` Tom D. Shaw
Title: Assistant Purchaaing Agent
Approved:
J n J. Marshall
tle Purchasing Agent
Liu r 9510
BID TITLE_ Hobson Lane/377 Water Main
OPENED_ 9/3/85 _ 9 & F Calvert Albenisus Dickerson D/FW
Construct. Paving Construct. Construct. Utility
ACCOUNT d _
y
Q•. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
Total Water facilities 1789854.00 190,410.53 133,639.00 116,632.0 1491116.0
Alternate 729359.00 91,070,00 61,359.00 309474.8 73,665.00
161nch water 11"e cost 154,847.00 166,217.00 116,950.00 115,373.0 131,426.0
10 inch water line cost 71,709.00 89.820.00 60,709.00 49,689.8 73,163,0
Difference 839138.00 769397.08 56,241.00 65,683.2 58,263.0
Low total cost to City fir
r rticipation 56,241.00
r
October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAIOR AND MhMBERS UP THE (,1TI COUNCIL
FROM: Rick Syehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Bid Opeping, City Participation, Hobson Lane/U.S. 377
Oversize Waterline, Bid 19510, Storer Homes Inc.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 18,
1985, recommended to the City Council approval of $56,24: as
the cost of the City's share for this water line oversize from
10" to 16".
SUMMARY
Bids were opened September 9, 1985, and the results are as
follows:
City's
16" W. L. 10" W. L. Sharo^"
Albenesius Construction $1160950.00 $609709.00 $569241.00
DVW Utility Company 1312426.00 73,163.00 580263.00
Dickerfon Construction 1151373.00 49,689.80 65,683.20
Calvert Paving Co 166,217,08 890820.00 76,397.08
B&F Construction 1549847.00 710709.00 83,138.00
""difference between 16" and 10"
BACKGROUND
This oversize agreement was approved by the City Council August
219 1984. The pro~>osed 16" water line is in accordance with the
roaster water distribution study of Hogan and Rasor Inc.,
Engineers. The participation agreement is for approximately 6000
LF of 10" to 16" of water line. However, the developer is
proposing to install only about 3,694 LF at this time, and he
needs to install the remainder in the future.
3934U:5
i
44
( j.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
City of Denton Municipal Utilities, City Engineer, the Developer
and the citizens.
FISCAL IMPACT
FY 85 budgated estimated 10" to 16" water line, 6,000 L~:
$72,000
Actual City's Share 10-16"
Waterline $569241
3,694 LF
Faurce of Funds: Water bond funds- 623-008-0461-913b-7927
Prepared by:
Q1,4,4 1 Su &ted,
Srini Sundaramoorthy
`a
fickSy
Civil Engineer
Water/Wastewater Divisions Acting City Manager
APPro1 v 6LLrr
R. E! N
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Copy of Oversize Agre-Bent
II Bid Tabulation
III Location Map
IV Minutes PUB Meeting of 9/18/85
I
i
393411:6
-moo...
F V
~ a t a 'tot
1 f• ( X11 ~ 1 ~ .M '
C .1,~:' l~ I ` :I t Ate'±j j1 `V t',
c"Orr
C, t f.A+1TlX6
LIAOA
1 j
ui
• r:
I , _ ~7 it i
pp,
~ ~ ~ .jam, 1 / .;I~; ~ M
` roma err ~
it to ~ • ~ ; ~ ~ ,
y2•~ ten/ 11 , ~'~-iii •t
1. V
1
WATERLINE OVE'111 PAATICIP6220N AGREEMENT
THE STATE Of TEXAS S
KNOW ALL MfN BY THEAE PRESLNTSI
COUNTY Of DENTON I
THAT WHEREAS, STORER HOMES, INC., is the Daveloper of certa:,i
property shown on the attached map, which sap is incorpor:.ted
herein as it set forth in full, and further described as property
on Bush Creek Road and State Highway 377, (near City of A99l0e),
and Developer desires to serve such property with 70,000 feet of
on and offsits water line facilities and,
WHEREAS, the Argyle Nat Eupply Corporation (AWSC) desires
that such on and offsitt water facilitiea be overtired and the
AWSC will participate in the additiraal coat of the oversized
facilities frog the north side Of the Santa to Railroad, approxi-
mately 1%,C70 feet to the south end of the Storer property,
pursuant to the provisions Of the Denton Development Code,
Appendix A to the Code of Ordinences of the City of Denton
T)xaal and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton also desires that such on and
off site water facilities be oversized and the City of Denton
wkli participate In the additionsi cost of the oversized
faclittiee from Hobson LVIS to the north Bide of the Santa re
Railroad, approximately 6,000 teat, purutant tv the provisions
of the Denton Development Code of the City of Denton, TexasI
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT, made this '02~ay of
10841 by and betw •n STORER HOMES INC., ARGYLE
WAT~TION (AWSC), AND THE CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS, a HOMO
Rule Municipal Corporation of the State of Texas, hereinafte:
called 4City61
WiTNESSETHI
1. The Developer std AWSC x:11 install, by contract or
otherwise, a IV water line and aeourtenanceS to serve the
• property described on the Ar.cachod map in accordance with all
WATERLINE OVERSIiE PARTICIPATION AGRESMENT/STORER HOMES, INC.
PAOE 1
City of Denton ordinances, rules, regulations, policies and
procedures. The said facilities shalt be located AS Shorn on
the attached nap which is made a pact neteof for all intents and
purposes, The enyineering design and easement purchases will be
paid by the Developer and AWSC.
2. The AWSC share Of the 18timated Coat of Oversising Said
facilities is ;168.900 (11,0001 x $32-520.00) for construction
Only. The City of Denton share of the eStimatad cost of
oversising slid facilities is ;12,000 160000, x $32 - 420.001
for construction Jnly- Upon completion cf construction and
acceptance by the City of said facilities, the actual Cost of
the AWSC and city's oversize participation in said facilities
Shall be determined and certified to oy the Director cl
Utilities or his designee, and his certificate setting out the
AWSC and City's cost of said facilities shall be attached hereto
and made a pact heteof.
3. The AWSC and City shall pay for their shares of the
facilities within thirty (30) days from the date of acceptance
of the facilities- it under Such terms and conditions that are
mutually acceptable to the patties.
T .le to Said facilities is hereby and shall at all times
be vested in the City.
5. The D+velopet and AWSC snall and does hereby agree to
indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages,
lose or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to
property or third person occasioned by any act or omission,
neglect of wtOng-dOing of Developer or AWSC, its office u,
agents, employees, invitees, COntiactors of other persoiss with
regard to the perfornanCe of this contLact, and Developer and
AWSC will, at their own cost and expense, detend and protect
against any and all such claims and demands.
WATERLINE OMS M PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/STOREA HOMES, INC.
PAGE 2
7, 777-,T~- 77 1771r,
•
IN WITNESS HHIREO►, this instrum"t is exaCUted in by sela
parties this day of
~a2~.~ 14SA,
AP.GYLI HATER SUPPLY CORD RATION STORIR HOMIS INCORPORATED
(AHSC)
syl
BY:
CITY Of DINTONt TEXAS
BY:
C D E MAY
ATTIST:
4• CIT`! OP DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL ?ORM:
JOE D. MORRISr ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
li
J
s
HATERLINI OVIRSIII PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/STORER HOMLSi W.
PAGE
'A' V ♦1r, .a4 w" Li, • T1'R!!11
n ~'n `~°"r f ~.a fwn. ~y. ~yl r5F Ct t'i d , t ".pF
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
September 189 1985
OliSIDER BID OPENING CITY PARTICIPATION HOBSOONN
Ham presented this item for Board review.
Thompson made a motion to recommeind the Council
accept a bid in the amount of $S6,241, as the
City's share t., ,varsl-,., s04 LP of water line from
0" to 16".
Nancy Boyd seconded the potion. All ayes, no
nayes, motion carried.
I
v 1: yy! s;. rq`~'S''Aa,'-~'._1+♦ : 1 i r P
v k: r r, r
n"tr
DATE: October It 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: 910 09513 REPAIR AND PAINT TWO 2,000,000 GALLON WATER TANKS
RECOMMEMOATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest responsible
bidder, GAS Sandblasting, in the amount of $60,380.00 for
the McKenna Park Tank and $53,614,00 for the tank located
at the Water Plant. Total bid price of $114,054.00.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the sandblasting, cleaning, and repainting
back to existing color; of two 2,,000,000 gallon water storage
tanks.
BACKGROUND: Tabu',tion Sheet
PROGRAHS9 DEPARTWNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Capital improvements to Water Plant Facilities
FISCAL IMPACT: 1985/86 Budget Funds Account /620-008.0460.8301
Maintenance of Building and Equipment
spec ally bm! d:
Itick Svehla
acting City Manager
Pr rcd by:
aR, Tom P. Shaw, C.P.M.
01.1e: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
n . ,"iarshaII, C. P,Rf;"
•1e~ urchasing Agent
I
aID # 9513 I
BID REPAIR TWO 2,000,000 TANK GbS TANK DON L.
O.L.D.
OPEN September 12 lyb5 2 p.m. SAND- SAND- OWEN COMPANY
+ BLASTING BLASTING PAINTING
ACCOUNT I A PAINTIN &PAINTING
ESCRIPT 0 VENDOR ENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION'
McKenna-Park 6Q.Rl9,Q
2 Water Plant Tgnk ,§3.§74,00,90,790.00 A8.905,oQ_U.441.fln
Total 114,054.0 145,290.OLMM~ol JA1667fi,hi
r
r w~ r r
ai Y. h.. .*i , +P`?T; s• l . .:e`x i!'F"''~7""~'^*T!
e: P`ye m• r {7 i
DATES October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TOi MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL
FROMI Rick Svehia, Acting City Manager
SUBJECTi Consider Bid Opening for Interior Painting of McKenna Patk
Storage Tank and One 3mg Ground Storage Tank at the Water
Plant, Sid 49513
hRCOMMENDATIONs
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 18, 1985,
recommended approval of the lowest bidder, G & S Sandblasting and
Painting in the amount of $114,054.00.
SUMMARYe
The bids were opened September 12, 1985, and the results are as
follows$
McKenna Park Tank 2mg Tank TOTAL
0 WPP
G & S Sandblasting and
Painting Co., Abilene, Texas $60,380.00 $53,674.00 $114,054.00
Tank Sandblasting & Painting
Co., Mineral Wells, Texas 540500.00 90,790.00 145,290.00
Don L. Owen Painting Co.,
Dallas, Texas 60,819,00 88,905.00 149,724.00
Old Cc , Mineral Weller Texas 880235.00 93,441,00 181,676.00
The Public Utilities Board shall recommend approval of the lowest
bidder G & S Sandblasting and Painting in the amount of
$114.054.00. .,be t46 tanks were bid together and the rocomended
lowest bidder is the combined lowest.
BACKGRGUNDi
The painting on these tanks is 10-15 years old and the recent
interior inspection of the McKenna Park tank revealed that it
needed new painting. The 2 mg storage tank At the water plant is
also in the stages of paint deterioration. The City is planning to
install the high-service pump at the McKenna Park, the construction
of which will begin approximately end of October, 1985, subject to
board and city council approval. The staff believes it is a good
time to start and complete the painting before the McKenna Park
pump station becomes operational.
ry
j~ vi., v ilg r, y o` y✓ F'~.^ r1 .Lt r,:A i '.I D'~ R'A u
FISCAL IMPACTe
This is a proposed PY86 project. The staff is aware that FY66
budget is still being reviewed, and this request is subject to the
PY86 budget approval by the council. This project is intended to
begin after October 1, 1985.
Proposed FY86 budgeted amount $:'000000.00
Recommended Award to G & S Sandblasting
and Painting 1140054.00
Source of Fundse Revenue 620-008-0460-8301
Res ct ly s ittede
Rick Svehle
Acting City !tanager
Prepared bye
C. David Ham
Assistant Director of Utilities
APPROVEDt
l
E, Nelson
Director of UE!!ities
EXHIBIT Ie Bib Tabulation
EXHIBIT 113 Minutes of PUB meeting of 1-16-85
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD 14EETING
September 18, 1985
I
CONSIDER BID OPENING FOR INTERIOR PAINTIN3 OF
MCKENNA PARK STORAGE TARY7 NRD tFtSW
WATER STORAGE TANK AT THE U. 1 ,
Thompson made a motion to recommend the Council
accept bid in the amount of $60,38.0 for the
McKenna Park tank and $53,674 for the 2M6 tank at
the Wastewater Treatment Plant by G&S Sandblasting.
Frady seconded the motion. All ayes, no nayos,
motion carried.
r
`r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR' EMERGENCY
PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SEL.,?ICES IN ACCOR-
DANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAN MEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES
FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
VHERER•S, state law requires that certain contracts re iriog
on expenditure or payment by the City in an amount Oxus a ding q~,S,000
be by competitive bids,. except in the case of public calamity
where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to
ofltheecity, aoreitiI a necessary citizens, to protect the publ c healthrofethi
aititens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public
property, machinery or equipmei,`; and
WIMEAS Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinancesrcquires
that the eL ty Council approve all expenditures of sore than
$140009 and
. WHEREAS, section 2.09 sf t4a City Charter requires that every
act of the council pro-,r ding for the expenditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordiname s;
NOWs THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL. OF THS CITY OF DENTON HjrtBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That tho City Council hereby determines that there is a public
calamity thst makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate
money to relieve the necessity of the cititans or to prassre the
property of the city, or to protect the public health of the
citizens of the city, or to provide for uaforseen dame a to public
property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the
following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies 3r
services, a described in the "Purchase Orders' attachad hereto,
ari, hereby 4pprovedt
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER ADOR AMOUNT
7009a morn axcAVersoN 12s,000,0wo,
70099 8M SICAVATION 21 125.00
. -----.......rte....
r
r..._+..
PACE L
~rrrr.rrwr.c
ir n "r b x~~•.. .,..y r ri. Gerry:..
SECTION 11.
That because of such emergency, the City Manager ov designated
eavloa* is hereby authorized to purchase the materials, equipment,
supplies or services ae described in the attached Purchase Orders
and to oaks payment therefore in the amounts therein stated, such
emergency purchhaases beano to accordance with the provisious of
state law exempting such purchases by the City from the require
meats of competitive bids.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passers and approval.
'PASSED AND APPROVED this the I day of _ October , 198S:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLM CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,9TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK:
DEBM ADAHI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAOS 2
7,1 w1-1 P Y.
DATE: October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDERS #70099 and #70098 BOYD EXCAVATION
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend purchase order #70098 in the amount of not to
exceed $25,000.00 be approved and that purchase order
number 70099 in the amount of $21,125.00 be approved also,
SUMMARY: These purchase orders are for the lining and compaction 0 ,the
refuse cell bottom and side wall (purchase order #70098) and
for the additional 325 hours of scraper rental for landfill
excavation (purchase order #70090),
MCKGROUND: Purchase Orders 70098 and 70099
.RIOGRANS9 DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Landfill Operations
FISCAL IMPACT: Solid Waste Landfill Development Bonds Account
Number 631-002-0803-8502
R pest ully s bmi ted:
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
Pre red by:
aml my ` om aw,
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
a a rs a
T chasing Agent
901.8 "1EXA3~S711EL7 , FORCHABE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201
P. 11. NUMBER
T DATE / FNDOR NO, DOCUMENT
0099 04;24/85 SOLID WASTZ TYF
BOY49000
VENDOR SHIP TO:
BOYD EXCAVATION
3500 FT WORTH DR
DENTONs TTX 70201
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER
UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUR
01 531 002 0303 0502 323 HOURS SCRAPPER RENTAL
21s125.~i:,The City of Denton, Texas Is lax exempt. House Bill No. 20,
d AL F p.o. 21 125.0+
rr~+rr~~'~~rr
Reference P, 0. Number on all B/L, Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments are F. 0, 8. City of Denton, or as Indicated. By
Send Invoices TO,- Direct Inquiries TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.
215 E. P. M. Purchasing Agent
McKinney St,, Denton, TX 76201 Tons 0, Snaw, C. p. R, Asat. PurchIslnp Agent
(Or as indicated on Purchase order) 817/566.8311 D/FW Metro 267.0012
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
c v ' s v r r
961.8 ?EXAs STREET' ER
2Qi
DENTON, T06
P. O. NUMBER DATE /VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYF
7009U 09/2 /85 SOLI WASTE
BOY40000
VENDOR SHIP TO:
3CjYD EXCAVATION
3500 FT MOPTH OR
DENTON* TTX 76201
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESr.RIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN'
OZ 631 002 0803 @502 1 FOR LINING LA10FILL. BOTTOM 25r000.3C
C2 631 002 0303 8502 RATER TROCK 0 '~5*00 FIR
03 631 002 0803 8502 GRAUER 1 6;1.00 HR
04 631 002 0303 8302 COMPACTOR l 66000 HOUR
The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt - House 8111 No. 20. OTAL F p•0. 25, 000.0.
Reference P. 0. Number on all 8 i I., Shipments and Invoices.
Shlpteats are F. 0. S. City of Dented, or as Indicated. By
Send Invoices TO: Direef Inquirio% TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C. P. M. Purchasing Agent
215 If. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D. Shaw, C. P. M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
{or t Indicated on Purchase Wit) 011/566.6311 D/Fw Vitro 267.0042
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
all COVNCIL RRPOM;r,[ OATS, id/Ol/85
TOs Mayor end *#%bs;e of the City Counoil /V
FRWS: Rick Svehla, Acting City Ketager
SUSJT9CT1 ADOPTION OF AV ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY :15
ACRRS OF LAND dtIN4 PART OF THE J. WEST SURVEY, ABSTRACT 13311 W
BEOIRRINO APPROXIMATELY 5,000 FEET WORTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380 EAST
AND WEST OF ROCKHtLL ROAD (A-22)
ai.~rQAS.LQ!!~
$s
TQe is a continuation of an annexatton plan begun in 1983-84 that
will extend the City of Denton'e extraterritorial jurisdiction in
this area to enable additional future annexations in the area of our
future water ceooures and aid in defining the ultimAte northeastern
boundary of the City of Dtnton.
~ACKORORVDs
Final action on a 175 acre strip •djoining this area wee taken by
the City Co.aoil on February 21, 1984. The annexation process was
initiated earlier, but halted when an error was discovered concerning
the legal description and affected property owners.
P.EiQ¢BNS~, DEPAR'~'KBNT8 OR QBQ fps -AF Cant
All of th,, property belongs to the City of Dallas,
FISCAL IKS'ACTa
Undetermined
R rot ly su itt s
Rick Svehla
Prepared bys Acting City Manager
r~'►
Devid Ellison
Senior Planner
Appro dJeff Keys
Director of planning
and De';4 opmoat
11956
a*.
1 Qom'
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT Of LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY-OF DENTON* TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 115 ACUS OF LAND LYING AND BEINo
SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTIN STATE Of TEXAS AND BRING PART OF
THE J. HEST SURVEY ABSTRACT W- 1331 DENTON COUNTY TCJM
CLASSIFYING THE SAMi AS AGRICULTURAL "A6 DISTRICT PROP6TY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas, and
WHXR1AS, an opportunity w 4s afforded. public hearia held
for that purpose on the ~ day of 1985 ~n the
Council Chambers for all-AW!reated persona state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity r s afforded, t a public heartoj held
for that purpose on the - 6 day of u .*ST- . 1985 in the
Council Chambers for all n erested persona o sae their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has beta published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the Citq of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, end after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDA1NSi
SECTION 1.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
to hereby annexed to the City of Dentoo, Texas, and the sane is
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitentc thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shell be bound by
the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which way
hereafter be enacted qnd the property situated therein shall be
subject to and shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by
the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as
follows, to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, St; a of Texas, being part of the J. West
gtsrtay, Abstract 1331 and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point lying
in tl:e 'forth boun<'rry tine of said tract dera,,ibed in Ordinance
No. 84.15, said point also Iyins in the East boundary line of a
tract described in Volume 607, Page 563 of the Deed Records of
Dentr,n County, Texas;
THENCE North slon the East boundary line of a tract described in
Volume 607 Page 363 of the deed records to a point in 0s North
boundary I no of the J. Vast Survey, Abstract 1331;
THENCE East along the North boundary line of the J. West Survey, a
distance of 3,500 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE. South a distance of 500 test to a point for a corner;
PAGE I
77
some mmmmsamwp~n
THENCE Vaat a distance of MOO fast to a point for a corner;
THENCE South to a point
limits; for a corner in the said present city
THENCE Vast along said present city limits to the place of
beginning and containing 115 acres of land more of loan.
SECTION It.
he above pp PP g
tural All District randdahallasoyapPaA rronytheaofficialasonin cma
of the City of Denton, Texaaswhich map is hereby winded
accordingly.
SECTION I
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the ;O day of
1985.
PASSED AND .0PROVED by the City Council on. the - day of
1985.
CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DMON,pTEXAS
APPROVED AS to LEGAL FORM.
DEBRA ADAHI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ay:
PA06 2
w
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITi OF DENTON TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
W:EREAS; the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bovnded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Pi I ice
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine p011c,3 services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control dcuices will be inotalled
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will _,e provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines us extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the Bode of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accoiManco with article 4,09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas.
E, Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date t,i annexation,
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emeriency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the noel therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will beg7i; in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
It. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will bc: installed 1n the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreat.v,:
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tivo date of annexation. Ths same standards and
policies nov used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in exl+anding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Flectric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
r.lectric poy!er.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date cf annexation,
II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists 6f a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
l ~ at. c•.. r. .'a•aa 1.~1r i►1
•
i
a, i
EXTRA-TERRITORIAL JURISDIC1 ION LINE
' r.
21. Om
RHODES RD. _
1ARTLEE FIELD RD,
i a
ILLRD
✓ 1
r
•
.y1 ~ • 1
A-22 li~Qlisc.J,
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
"June 24, 1985 Submit City Council
agenda item
✓Juns 25, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
July 2, 1985 City CAUncil sets date, time and place
for public hearing
July 3, 1485 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
July 5, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
July 8, 1985 Submit City council agenda item
July 9, 1905 Submit City Council agenda back-up
* July 16, 1985 City Council holds public hearing
v-Ju1y 17, 1985 Notice to Denton Recctd Chronicle
July 190 1985 Publish notice and mailout
July 290 1985 Submit City council agenda item
July 30, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
August 6, 1985 City Council holds second
public heating
August 12, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
August l3, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
* August 20, 1985 City Council institutes annexation
proceedings
August 23, 1905 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle
✓ August 25, 1985 Publish ordinance
September i4, 1985 Submit City Council agoiida item
Ssptembet +79 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
" ate 4-► 1985 Final action by City Council at special
Cc h, lF, / called meeting
"Denotes action by the City Council
O964q
DATE1 10/01/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT /
TOt Mayor and Members of the C+ty Council
FROM Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE INSTITUTINO ANNERATION PROCEEDINGS FOR
AGPROXIMATELY 160 ACRES BEING PART OF TH3 BBB AND CRR dURVEY,
ABSTRACT 141, AND LOCATED NORTH OF FM 1173, SOUTH OF BARTHOLD ROAD,
'PEST OF IN-35 St AND EAST OF MASCH BRANCH ROAD ANL THE GC 6 SF
RAILROAD (A-24)
g9COMMENDATIONt
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends annexation as proposed.
SUMMARY:
Residents of the area in question and staff are concerned about
development patteeAv and possible environmental impacts. Some
limited development is underway and existing land uses include auto
salvage business and similar unattractive commercial ventures.
BACKGR01)D t
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The City of Denton Public Utilities Board, City Engineer, Planning
and Community Development Department and some area residents have
expressed concerns abcit existing and potential land use conditions
of this area.
Properties and land uses that are partially in the City o: included
in this proposed annexation included five (5) single family resi-
dence, PorL A-Stall, Footer's Western Wear i Saddle Shop, Dozier
Cahinet Works, W 6 W Auto Salvage, Border Cowboy Truck Stop, Howdy
Doody Grocery, Cunningham's Photography Studio/reeldence/mini-
warehouses, commercial builAinq construction and a formor golf
driving range.
F?SCAL IMPACTt
Undetermined
R spect lly a mit s
Prepared byt Rick evehla
Acting City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Appro ds
J*if Meye
Director of Planning
and Development
08116
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance instituting annexation
proceedings for a tract of land approximately
160 acres in size being part of the 8.!3.B, and
C.R.R. Survey, Abstract 141, and located north
of FM 1173, south Cf Barthold (toad, West of
I-35N and east of Masch nranch Road and the GC
and SF Railroad (A-24).
SUMMARY; Residents in the area of property described above
have expressed concern about existing and poten-
tial development and land use conditions.
Existing development elong the City's 500 foot
strip includess Border Cowboy Truck Stop, Howdy
Doody Gvocery, Foster 's Saddle Shop, Dozier
Cabinet Works, Curiningham's Photography Studio
and Mini-Warehouses, Port-A-Stall Factory Outlet,
and W & W Auto Salvage.
The City of Denton Public Utilities Board has
also recommended that the City Council consider
annexation of this area after reviewing problems
associated with the Cowboy Truck Stop sewer
system approximately two (2) months ago. The
Border Cowboy Truck Stop sewer problem has been
resolved for now, but environmental concerns
remain with respect to this general vicinity.
The City Engineer and members of the Planning
Department met with the owner of pro~;rty
between Barthold Road and FM 1173 which was
formerly used as a driving range for golfers.
The property owner has stated that it is his
intention to develop mini-warehouses and similar
commercial uses. Little or no regard for City
of Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations was shown during discussions. The
City Engineer is particularly concerned about
stated plans to alter natural drainage patcerns.
A site visit has revealed some development
activity -nn the land in question. City of Denton
regulations governing property in the extra-
territorial jurisdiction may not prove helpful
if actual subdivision of land does not occur.
It is also impossible to prevent further
development of unattractive commercial land uses
such as auto salvage yards without zoning
control.
I
77-
City Council Back-up
October 11 1985
Page 2
SUMMARY
(Continued): Anrexation and control of land use through zoning
will have little effect on existing conditions
if traditional non-conforming status remains in
effect. But again, it appears to be the most
expedient and forceful method available for
monitoring future undesirable land uses. The
relative proximity of this area in relation to
the existing city limits (500 foot strip from
center line of I-35) appears to make it a good
candidate for annexation when such factors as
impact of land uses on the City of Denton and
availability of City services is considered,
ACTION REQUIRED: Adoption of ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission ,ecommends
annexatic:i as proposed.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve ordinance and continue annexation
2. Deny ordinance and discontinue annexation
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Map
2. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of
September 11, 1985
N11 ndh'om
I M
ITI Planner
0817s
.
d '
11S7L
a
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGU04JS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LO', TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 160 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND $ZING
SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF
THE BBB 6 CRR SURVEY, ABSTUCT 141 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "I" DISTRICT PROPERTY; A43
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
rveular booting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing hold
for that purpose on the day of Seajemb~rg 1985 in the
Council Chambers for all nterested persons to sae their views
and prosInt evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinances and
WHEREAS, an opportunity w 1g at a public hearing held
. sJ 1 g
for that purpose on the l~.I+ day of , 1985 in the
Ccuncil Chambers for all -interested perso e o s A e their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
. one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NUW1 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by
the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may
hereafter be enacted and the property situated thsrain shalt, be
subject to And shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by
the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as
follow, to-Vitt
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the BBB L
CRR Survey, Abstract 141 and I-ning more particularly described as
follows:
BEVINNINO at a point in the ppresent city limits as established by
Ordinance No. 69.40, Tract VI, said point lying 500 feet Vest of
and perpendicular to the center line of 1-33 and in the center
line of I'M 1173;
THENCE South 89°39' West, along the center line of said FM 11730 a
distance of approximately 2,1$3.5 feet, more or less, to a point;
THENCE South 87057' west, continuing aloe the center line of said
YM 1173 a distance of approximately 1,9 3.5 feet more or labs,
to a point in the East right-of-Way line of the 0.4.6S.f. Rsilrcr.d
for a cornar;
THENCE North 23°32' Nest, along the East right-of-way line of said
railroad, a distance of approximately 1,782.3 feet, more or Imes,
to a point in the North boundary line of said survay and a Bract
convayed to A, F. Barthold by deed racorued in volume 40, Page
549, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, said point also
lying in an East and West county road, known as Barthold;
THENCV. East, along the North boundary line o£ said aurvay and weld
Barthold tract in said road, a distance of approximately 20343.4
feet, core or less, to the Northeast corner of said Barthold
tract, same being the Northeast corner of a tract conveyed to
James +f Corbin by deed recorded in Volume 788. Page 429, of the
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE South 89°28' East along the North boundary lino o` said
Corbin tract and said survey in said ro&d, a distance of 11034.21
feet to the Northeast corner of said Corbin tract, same being the
Northwest corner of a tract conveyed to Willard E. Simpson by dead
recorded in Volume 1215, Psg. 864 of the Deed Records of Denton
County, Texas;
THENCE North 89°15'40" East, along the North boundary line of said
Simpson tract and said survey is said road, passing at 693.04 feet
of the Northwest corns% of a tract conveyed to Wesley Clark by
deed recorded in Volume 894, Page 375, of the Deed Records of
Denton County, Texas, and continuing along the North boundary line
of said Clark Lract and safd survey in said road for a total
distence of 1,000 feet to the Northeast corner of said Clark
tracl., same being the Northwest corner of a tract conveyed to
• USBr.,k by deed recorded in Volume 1168, Page 786, of the Deed
Resurds of Denton County, Texas;
THEIICE South 69°29' East, along the North boundary line of said
USBank tract and said survey in said road, a distance of
approximately 324.6 feet, more or less, to a point in the said
present city limits, said point lying 500 feet West of and
perpenjicular to the renter line of 1-35;
THENCE South 0°44" East, 500 feet Nest of and parallel to the
center line of I-35, along said present city limits, a distance of
spp:oximately 1,083.25 feet, more or less, to a point;
THENCE South 2°57" East, coutinijing 5UO feet Went of and parallel
to the centerline I.35, Along said present city limits a
distance of approximtely 578.11 feet, more or less, to the place
of beginning and containing 160 acres of land, more or less.
SECTIUN 11.
The above. described propa.ty is hereby classified as ricul-
tural "A" Dis-.rict and shall so appear on the official zoning nap
of the City of Denton, Texas, whi-h map is hereby amended
accordingly.
SECTION 111,
Should any section or part of this ordinance be held
unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, or the application thereof
ineffective or inapplicable as to any territory, such unconstltu-
tivnality, illegality, invalidity or ineffectiveness of such
secti4in or part shall in no wise affect, impair or invalidate the
remaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such remaining
portion or portions, the same a:.all be and remain in full force
and affect; and should this ordinance for any reason be ineffec,.
Rive as to any part of the area hereby annex.d to the City o! '
Dentooo such ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any such part
or parts of any such area shall not affect the effectiveness of
~jl I- 11"j
10
i
this ordinance as to all %%f the remainder of such area, and the
City Council hereby declares it to be its purpose to annex to the
My of Denton overy part of the area described in Section I of i
this ordinance, regardless of whether any other part of such j
describRd area is hereby effectively annexed to the City. !
Provided, further, that 1E there is included within he general
description of territory :et out in Section I of this .rdinance to
be hereby annexed to the City of Denton sny lands or area which
are presently part of and included within the limits of the City
of Denton, or which are presently part of and included within the
limits of any other Cit , T)wn or Village, or which are not within
the City of Denton's urLadiction to annex, the sane is hereby l
excluded and excepted rom the territory to be hereby annexed as
fully as if such excluded and excepted area were expressly
described herein.
SECTION IV.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the _ day of ,
1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of a
i
r_ 1985.
e1TCTJgCD77STEAAKT, i~.NA
CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ECRETARY
CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMi DRAYOVITCH, CITY PTTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
by: /&h(?
~f
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CIT. OF DENTON. TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, t4v City of Denton is contemplating annexation of as
area wi;ich is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and oti:er
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the affective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other ',-ffic control devices will be installed
as the need the7efore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the sire fighting force, will be provided
on the affective date of annexation,
C. Water
(2) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 -)f appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texa..
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
riate of annexation,
a d } 3
r
Service plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the ,?ame basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and tither such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be acc.mplished under the establisheu
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin iu the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the anizexed area on the effective
date of annexation. iity planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on 'he effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribition
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power,
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name sign-i where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City c( nsist (j A ri,;r: year plan that is un-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportuz:itie~).
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Imi,nm (in ol,! 01 City e('r it ?iSILS.
The annexed area will F,,, rrnsidered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP pian, which will be no longer than one year fr<•m
,he date c)f annexation. In this neu CIP planting y(-,ai
an„exati-n area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
M~ v -07
~ : o ~ R :d ,
ad
M
Via
.
~a Blu cand
o ti•
•po.pz r onzer
R~.' ~ •
Chin
Is
a •
90
a
a i
tG h
'ko
pnoh Rd • 'arthold Ads •
!
are
(►vT11 t •
gack 0 •c y •7p N v
P • J (7: =8 u niv
d
R F r r 1 n~ ~ a.r 1, ~ -fr:Xe
A-24
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
e/ August 12, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
August 131 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
August 20, 1985 City Council sets date, time and place
for public hearing
August 21, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
August 23, 1985 Publish notice and mailout.
August 26, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
1r August 27, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
September 3, 1985 City Council holds first public hearing
v September 4, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
September 6, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
September 9, 1985 Submit City Council agenda !tens
September 10, 1985 Submit City council agenda back-up
September 10, 1985 Planning and Zoning commission makes
recommendation
tom" September 17, 1985 C ty Council holds second public hearing
v ` September 23, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
L September 24, 1985 Submit City council agenda back-up
* cctober 1, 1985 City council adopts ordinance and
service plan instituting annexation
pcoceedinga
October 4, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle
October 6, 1785 Publish ordinance
November 11, 1985 Submit city council agenda item
November 12, 1985 Submit City council agenda back-up
* November 19, 1985 Adoption of final annexation ordinance
and service plan by City Council
* Denotes action by the City Council
09648
...P 6 Z'Mlnutes
September ii, 1985
Page T CO
IA-24: Petition of City of Denton for annexation of
approximately 160 acres being part of the B.B.B. and
C.R.R. Survey, Abstract 141, and located north of FM 11739
(UNAPPROVED) south of Barthoid Road, west of 1-35 ncrth, and east of
Masch Branch Road and the GC A SF Railroad,
Mr. Ellison stated that this area warrants city control
and needs urbanization. He said that in this area is an
auto salvage) aho that has change: the land use. 'Ie added
that the Border cowboy Truck Stop had sdme problems with
their sewer system and it was sugggested by the Public
Utilities Board that they should be annexed, lie stated
that at the last City Council meeti:g the biggest issue
was five existing residences that were not creating any
land use problems. City Council believed that they should
be annexed also. He said that City Council can eliminate
any part of this annexation,
DECISION: Mr. Pearson moved to recommend approvcl of
L A- Z4; seconded by Ms. Brock and unanimously carried (6-0).
D. A-27. Petition of Aikman Development Corporation and
rid y of Denton for annexation of approximately 117.5 acres
being part of the B. Merchant Survey, Abstract 800, the
C. Chacon Survey, Abstract 298, and the S. Venter Surve%
(UNAPPROVED) Abstract 1315, and beginning at the southwest corner of
FM 2181 and Hickory Creek Road and north of Old 11ton
Estates,
Mr. Ellison said that approximately 63 acres of ounton
Manor Estates, which is a subdivision, is voluntary, Ths
remaining property is involuntary and needs to be anreA e,;
to create a uniform city limit line,
Stephanie Compton, owner of 80 acres east of this parcel,
stated that she is in favor of the annexation.
Richard Compton stated that he and others of .,ac niini,
areas were in favor of the annexation.
DECISION: Mr. Escue moved to recommend approval vi A-27;
seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0).
E. SET A DATE, TIME" AND PLACE for an orientation workshop.
Mr. Claiborne: suggested a workshop be held on Wednesday,
October 16, 1985 t 5:00 p.m, Commissioners present
concurreO. Mr, 4laaiborne asked staff t) find a place for
the meeting and contact those Commissioners not present to
determine if that would be a satisfactory date.
Meeting adjourned 6:30 p,m,
CITY COUNCIL REPORT PQRMAT DATE: 10/1/85
TO Mayor and Mem.iers of the City Council 1
!11 ,
NRQM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJBCr: Adoption of an ordinance instituting annexation proceedings for a
tract of land approximately 117.5 in size lying in and being a part
of the B. Merchant Survey, Abstract 800, the C. Chacon Survey,
Abstract 298 and the, S. Venter Survey, Abstract 1315, Denton County,
Texas, and beginning at the southwest zorner of PM 2162 and Hickory
Creek Road. (A-27)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning ar,d Zoning commission recommends annexation as proposed.
SU MARY:
This is a joint petition between Aikman Development Corp., requesting
voluntary annexation of a 62.474 acre (257 lot SP-7 detached)
subdivision, titled Dunton Manor Estates, beginning adjacent and
south of Hickory Creek Road and adjacent and west of PM 2181 and
north of Old Alton Estates, and the City of Denton, requesting the
involuntary annexation of the adjoining 55 acre tract to the east.
W:KtiROUND:
Adequate City of Denton utilities are available for extension to
this site. A final plat and possibly change in zoning request from
agricult ral (A) to single family (SP-7) is alticipated on the 62
acres owned by Alkman Development Corporation.
P,ZOG2AH3, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Approximately two single family res).dences are located within the
area proposed for annexation (involisntary portion).
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Res ectfu y sub tte :
Prep r by: Rick Svehla _
Acting City Manager
Patricia Ryan
Planning Intern
App ve
n~w
Director of Planning
and Development
1209a
77777
tC S
CITY COUNCIL',.AGENDA
BACK-IMP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 1, 1985
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance instituting annexation
proceedings for a tract of land approximately/
117.5 acres in size lying in and being part of
the B. Merchant Survey, Abstract 800, the C,
Chacon Survey, Abstract 298, and the S. Venter
Survey, Abstract 1315 and beginning at the
southwest corner of Fri 2181 and Hickory Creek
Road (A-27).
SUMMARY: Dunton Manor Estates, a planned 257 lot SF-7
subdivision on 62.474 acres, is proposed on
property beginning adjacent and south of Hickory
Creak Road, and west of FM 2181. An adjoining
55 acres was included in the annexation upon
City Council direction. 4
The City Council was interested in development °
potential of this area when the annexation
question was discussed c. July 2, 1985, Since
direction was given to bogin the process for
this parcel, a voluntary annexation and zoning
petition has been submitted for 50 acres on the
north side of Hickory Creek Roaa.
UTILITIES: The Utility Department has reported that an {
existing City of Denton 8' water line has
sufficient capacity to serve this development.
Sanitary sewer service is proposed from a 10'
City of Denton lisle that must be extended
approximately 31400 fcet to the Hickory Creek
lift station or from an existing 10' line along
FM 2181. Typical 8' sanitary sewer and 6' water
is proposed for internal service. Permission to
be served by the City of Denton utility system
must be approved by the Public Utilities Board,
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council
if the property is not annexed.
(.;as service is available from FM 2181.
Telephone service is available from FM 2181 and
riickory Creek Road. Electric service is from
either the City of Denton or TP&L.
r n3' .,err ! o'p.
r r v
city Council Back-t,p
October It 1985
Page 2
TRANSPORTATION: Hickory Creek Road is presently designated as a
secondary major arterial (80 feet of right-
of-way and 4 lanes ultimately on the official
thoroughfare plan of the City of Denton.)
The City has discussed designating Hickory Creek
Road as part of the Loop 288 system as opposed
to Ciyan Road. The owners have been informed of
this possibility and asked to consider larger
than required setbacks. Right-of-way dedication
cannot be required for LoDp 288 at this time and
no setbacks beyond the 25 foot minimum are being
providedl right-of-way sufficient for a secondary
major arterial is being dedicated. Fifteen feet
of right-of-way is being requested for FM 2181.
Staff projects that the entire row of lots (ten)
abutting Hickory Creek Road will have to be
acquired for right-of-way if conceptual plans
for Loop 288 become a reality.
Sidewalks ore required along Hickory Creek Road
for a distance of 858,88 feet and FM 2181 for a
iistance of 553.73 feet.
ACTION REQUIRED: Adoption of an ordinance
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Map
2. heduced plat
Davin Ellison
Senior Planner
Q88as
71 "1"
ao.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A 1AACT OF LAND CUhTIGUOUS AND ADJACEN'r TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL ThAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 111.5 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
PART OF ThS B. MERCHANT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 800, C. CRACUN
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 2980 AND THE S. VENTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1315
DINTON COUNTY, TEXAS' CLASSIFYING THE SANE AS AGRICUL :AAL "Ar'
DIiTRICT PROPERTY; ANd DECLARIN'; AN EFFECTIVE DATE. was
int regulorRmeetinghof rtheques CityfCouncileoftthe City of Denton, iit
xasa
on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
Wh&tEAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a p blic hearing held
for the, purpose on the 3~! day of
~Pr , 1985 Sn the
o the
a
Coul rs for all ndnpresentmevidence bearinupon the annexation eprovidedibyvthis
ordinance; and
WhEREA.S, an opportunity w&A afforded, at a p}},,•biic hearing held
for that purpose on the day of m be.~ 1965 in the
Council Chambers for a'l~rested per so a to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
• rinp ththis e official ordinance newspaper e of the published
one time
City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY OADAIHS:
SLCTION 1.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the dace
is hereby annexed to t"e City of Denton, Texas, and the same is
made hereby a part of void City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be wntitled to all the rights.and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by
the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may
hereafter be enacted and the propdrty situated therein shall be
subject to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes levied by
the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as
follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the d.
Xerchant Survey, Abstract 800, C. Chacon Survey, Abstract 198 and
the S. Venter Survey, Abstract 1315 and more particularly
deacrloed as follows:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the heat right-of-way line of Fh
1181 with the South boundary line of Hickory Creek Road, said
point lying 50 feet West and 37.5 feet South of the Northeast
corner of said Venter Survey;
THENCE East crossing said VK 2181, a distance of 95 feet to a
point In the East right-of-way line of said FM 2181 and the
present city limits and described in Ordinance No, 65-43 Tract III
for a corner;
■
r R' {
. it L.
ai
• THOC£ South long said
distance of approximately present 11 f s-;,c core olriloss, tora point-for e
corner, said point being an outei cll corner of said right-of-way;
THENCE East along said present city limits and ri&h-.-of-way, a
distance of 5 feet to an inner ell corner of said right-of-way;
dista.E South along said present city limits and right-of-way, a
fora ce o f approximately 1,954.55 foot, sore or less, to a point
T
HOU west, crossing said FM 1181, a distance of 100 feet to the
i4at
corner soft-a of-way tratl conveyeda to FBobllCarawaysebybeing ed thre recorded silt
Volume 1380, Page 236 of the Dead Kecords of Denton County, Texas;
TRINCL North 88°52'47" Vast, along trio Gouth boundary line of said
Caraway tract a distanci of 2 480.?4 feet to the Southwest corner
of said Caraway tract in tits Kest boundary line of the said Venter
THENCE Survey; yy boun CaawayNtractlandt Venter Sur ey,g andistanco ofdis 60line of .61 feet said
the dorthwast corner of said Caraway tract, same being the
racordedt inoVolume of 14a tract 18, Page 91 conveyed
thto 6. e Deed Records of W.iton
county, Texas;
INEUUC North 0°42'%'1" East, along the West vundary lira of said
Caraway tract and you sr Survey, a distance of 823.10 feet to a
point for a corner in tits South 5oundary line of an lsst and West
county road known as Hickory Creek Road;
THENCE East along the South boundary lin• of meld road, pawing at
859.73 feet the East boundary line of said Caraway tract, same
being the West boundary line of a tract conveyed to Frank Madrigal
Dentr%. C unty ~oTexae, Vcontinuing alPage ong 195 tf
South boDeed undary Records
line of
said ti0ed and passing at 11508.74 feet the East boundary line of
said Madrigei tract, some going the West boundary lint of a tract
conveyed to Alvin K. Meredith and wife Madlyn Meredith by deed
recorded in Volume 8190 Page 474, of the Deed Records of Denton
County Texas and continuing along the South boundary line of said
road for a total distance of 2,428.44 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 117.5 acres of land, more or less.
SBCTIOY 11.
pp
"
turalh"AabDDistrictranddshelf arty appear on the classified official as A r'cul-
of the City of Denton, Texas, which ■ap is hereby amended
accordingl.'.
SECTION III.
Should ■ny section or part of this ordinance be held
unconstitutional, ppippllegal or inva3!.d or the application thereof
tionality,e ill gality cabinvalilitytnnrtoinlfficllvene a ncofstiuch
section or part shall in no wise affect, impair or invalidate the
remaining portion or portions taoreof, but am to such remaining
portion or portions, the same shall be and remain in full force
and effect; and should this ordinance for any reason be ineffec-
tive to to any art of the area hereby annexed to the City of
® orn parts oft any suchi area osh+all h not oaffect e the effectiveness aof
this ordinance as to all of oh* remainder of such area# and the
City Council hereby deeiarea It to bb its purpose to annex to the
l
n T.
' Cit of Denton ever
Y y part of the area described in Section I of
this ordinance, regardless of whether any other part of such
described area is hereby effectively annexed to the city.
Provided, f-irther, that iE there is included within the general
description of territory set out in Section I of this Ordinance to
be hereby annexed to the City of Denton any iands or area which
are presently part of and included within the limits oC the city
of uenton, or which are presently part of and included within ti-.
limits of a:y other Cit , Town or Villags, or which are not within
the City of Danton's jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby
excluded and excepted rom the territory to be hereby annexed as
fully AN if such excluded and excepted area were expressly
described herein.
SECTION IV.
This ordL,. --a shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
Introduced before the City Council nn the _ day of
1985.
PASSED AND APPROVEV by the City Council on the day of
1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWAiT, YOK
CITY Of VENTON, TEXAS
AT'i ES T :
l 6 ALLENO CITY CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS
APPNOVEU AS TO LEGAL FOM:
MPA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATMV1Y
CITY OF liINTU,NNj TEXAS
BY: ~/j',Q A QA A jj. 67 W7 Y*
k -
< r. r
t V YK I • .1 :r1X. I f 3 7 .l7 1~ 1^
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA.; CITY OF DENTOK TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED PY THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS: Pursuant to amonded, Texas Section Code . Annotated, there the
Is hereby provisions adopted Article
the 970a as
annexation area tho following plan of service: proposed
1. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effoc:tive
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signala, traf°ic. signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial ustj
will be provided at city rates, from existing pity
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.00, of appendix A of the cods sf the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City o! Denton, 'texas.
0. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
v1ded +rr€thin the city will be extended to the
annexed area within ene month after the effective
date of annexation.
r ? i
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, inscalla-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1? Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extt•nd to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning w:il thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in tk~ substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expandin3 the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
i
Service Plan
Annex-r' Areas
Pagc ,ee
biisc( iianeuus
(1) street name signs whrrn rceded will be it,.,talleu
within a months after the effective
date of annexation.
I1. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The 111:,n is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based p::rtly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
r2; Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city econ,,mics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteritt as all other areas of the city.
7e ?.-,I r ~7s °E I~.'t t ;;"r""•
. 1 1.
I
. 1 ;
i
_ - . • _ HICKORY CREEK Ap._ {
tee. C-•.r----_ - - - • = :.f~,~~
. Y, fr f. r. r
~'>u bjeot site
1
/
I
• I
.ti voluntary
i I involuntary]
All"
h r
1 ~ ~ 1
♦A'
• Y I .~.~.~~~i • r ~ r ~.r . r . .~ti . w r ~ _•w _ ~ rr.. • r .~Iry ~ ~ 7
xs kip jr t*;T' : P w7 T v'r ° • ~C
A-29
ANNEXATION SCHECUGg ~
v August 12, 1985 Submit City council agenda item
v August 13, 1985- Submit City Council ageraa back-up
August 20, 1985 City Council sets date, time and place
for public hearing
✓ August 21, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
v August 23, 1985 Publish notice and mahout
August 26, 1085 Submit City Council agenda item
August 27, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
*vseptember 3, 1985 City Council holds first puVU c hearigq
.r September 4, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
,.September 6, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
September 9, 1985 Submit City Council agenda item
,,,-September 10, 1935 Submit City Council agenda back.-up
September 11, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission makes
recommendation
September 17, 1985 City Council holds second public hearing
September 23, 1985 Submit city council agenda item
v98ptember 24, 1985 Submit City Council agenda back-up
* October i, 1985 City council adopts ordinance and
service plan instituting annexation
proceedings
October 4, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle
October 6, 1985 Publish ordinance
November 114 1985 Submit City council agenda item
November 12, 1985 Submit City Council at ada back-up
* November 19, 1985 Adoption of final annexation ordinance
as,l service plan by City Council
* Denotes action by the City Council
09649
,.w.'1`W'r.rp"R.: rr-•_~.~3' R
f s A
r'.
P Z'Minutet
September ll, 1985
Page 7
C. A-24. Petitions of City of Denton for annexation cf
approximately 160 acres being part of the B.B.B. and
C.R.R. Survey, Abstract 1410 aad located north of FM 1173,
(UNAPPROVED) south of Bart hold Road, west of I-3S north, and east of
tdasch Branch Road and the GC 6 SF Railroad.
Mr. Ellison stated that this area warra;its city control
and needs urbanization. lie said that in this area is an
auto salvage shop that has changed the land u3e. He added
that the Border Cowboy Truck Stop had some problems with
their sewer system and it was sugggested by the Public
Utilities Board that they should be annexed. He stated
that at the last City Council meeting the biggest issue
was five existing residences that were not creating any
land use problems. City Council believed that they should
be annexed also. He said that City Council can eliminate
any part of this annexation.
DECISION: Mr. Pearson moved to recommend approval of
seconded by Ms. Brock and unanimously carried (6-0).
D.fA-27. Petition of Aikman Development Corporation and
U of Denton for annexation of approximately 117.5 acres
part of the B. Merchant Survey, Abstract 800 the
C. acon Survey, Abstract 298, and the S. Venter Aurvey,
(UNAPPROVED) Abstract 1315, and beginning at the southwest corner of
FM 2181 and Hickory Creek Read and north of Old Alton
Estates.
Mr. Ellison said that approximately 63 acres of Duuton
t!anor Estates, which is a subdivision, is voluntary. The
remaining property is involuntary and needs to be annexed
to create a uniform city limit line.
Stephanie Compton, owner of 80 acres east of this parcel,
stated that she is in favor of the annexation.
Richard Compton stated that he and others of surrounding
areas were in favor of the annexation.
DECISION: Mr. Escue moved to recommend approval of A-27;
L_secon a by Ms. Cole and unanimously carr.ed (6-0).
E. SET A DATE, TIME AND PLACE for an orientation workshop.
Mr. Claiborne suggested a workshop be hell on Wednesday,
October 16, 1985 at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners present
concurred, Mr. 6la1borne asked staff try find a nlaeo for
the meeting and contact those Commissioners not present to
determine if that would be a satisfactory date,
Meeting adjourned 6:30 p.m.
r
7 17 77
DATE: 10/01/85
CITY_MNCIL REPORT TFFORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City C I'
ouncil
FROM. Rir,K'Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANC3 S6TT;NG A DATE, TIME, AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS CONCERNING THE PETITION OF TIE CITY OF DENTON FOR ANNBXATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 296.97 ACRES BRING PART OF THE I-COY SURVEY, ABSTRACT 21
W. 6URL6SON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 93, 8. BURLESON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 249, AND
THE K. JOHNSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 666 (A-26)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends tl:gt public hearings be held on October 15 and November
5, 1985, at 7:00 p.m• in Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
SUMMARY:
The City Counr.il requested that staff research the possibility of
extending the city limit line (minimum 500' strip) along I-35N toward the
City of Sanger. Staff has determined that one annexation for a 3 1/2
mile distance (maximum permitted by law) would place the Denton city
limits approximately 1/2 mile south of the Sanger city limit line. The
City of Denton can annex property within its extraterritorial jurisdiction
without written consent so long as it does not annex within 1/2 mile of a
neighboring city limit line. Officials of the Cily of Sanger have
informed staff that their current city limit line ends on the northern
edge of Duck Creek.
FROGR4MS. DEPAP,TK9NTS OR GROUPS AFFECTZL:
Approximately 296.97 acres are included in this proposed annexation.
A strip 750 feet wide (300-400 feet of 1-35 right-of-way) is proposed.
The existing strip is 1,000 feet wide, but staff is recommending the 750
foot strip to avoid annexing s.aall portions of residences and structures.
FISCAL 13PACPs
Undetermined
Re peCt lye mit :
Rick 9vehla
Prepared by: Acting City Manager
David Ellison'
senior Planner
ApPro d!
Jeff Mey
Director Of Planning
and Developme%t
1265g(1)
1205L
NO.
AN ORSINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLf^8 FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CLRTAIa PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN BY
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AU'lORItING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR
TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS,
TdE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSi
SECTION 1.
un the day of 1905, at 7900 o'clock P. M.
ir, l City7ounail ChamEeis -57"EFe -Municipal Building of th^ City
of Denton, Te"s, the City Council will hold a public herring
giving all interested persona the right to appear and be heard on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
property described oolow,
On the day of , 1985, at 7s00 o'clock P.M.
in the City ouncil Cnaia ere o e unicipal Building of the C(ty
of Denton, Texas, tha City Council will hold a public hearing
giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
following described property, to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of lend lying and being situated
in the County of 0e*.ton, state Of Texas and being part of the I.
Coy Survey, Abstract 212, J. Ayers Survey, Abstract 2, K, Burleson
Survey, Abstract 93, B. Burleson Survey, Abstract 249 and the R.
Johnson Survey, Abstract 666 and more particularly described as
followas
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, Said point lying
in the North be)undary line of the tract described in Ordinance Nc.
69.40, Tract VI, said point lying 350 feet West of and
perpendicular to the center line of 1-35s
i
THENCE Northerly, 350 feat Nest of and parallel to the center line
of 1.35 the following f6Ut (4) courses and digtaneess
(i) NORTH 10 5s' west, a distance of 2,199.7) feet, (2) North
00 53' East, a distance of 6.168.64 teo:s 131 North 9O 02'
west, a distance of S,202.191 (4) North 20 10' west, a distance
of 4,903.36 feet to a point for a corners
THENCE North 870 10' East, panning at 350 feet the center line
of 1-35 and continuing for a tonal distance of 700 feet to a point
for a corner, said point lying 330 feet East of and perpendicular
to the center line of 1-351
THENCE Southerly, 350 feet East of and garailel to the center line
of 1-35 the following tour (4) course$ and distances
(1) SOUTH 20 $0' East, a distance of 4,865.44 tests (2) South
90 02' East, a distance of 5,225.71 felts (3) South 00 53'
West, a dlstsi.:o of 6,211,96 feat, (4) South 10 58' East, a
distance of 2,192.29 feet to a point tot a corner in the present
city limits, said point lying in the North line of a tract
ewscribed in I)rdinanca 69.40; Tract VII
THENCE South 680 02' west, Along said present city limits,
passing at 350 feet the center line of 1.3S and continuing for a
total distance of 700- feet to the place o.0 beginning and
containing 296.91 acted of land more or leas,'
.4-26
y w ~ a q
i•
'S1 r~ ti rl{ i". *rwr. SECTION II,
and Tae Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is nereby authorized
nd directed to cause notice of auch public bearings to bo
published once In a newspaper having general circulation in the
City and In the above descrloed territory not more than forty days
not leas than twenty days prior to the date of such public
hearings, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act
(Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes).
SECTION III.
This ordinance snail be in full force and affect immedi+Lely
following fts passage and apprcvai.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1965.
CITY 07 DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CHARIZffE ALCENo CITY SECRE
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMr
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF /DENTON, TEXAS
Bye 7C//
'J
',~}a.~r v ~i C:a s';a ~ .t S.,'_'r',??-~~._ i+~ l t~ y:~ t~+.•i~. ,.'__s^__'^".-,~'9
1~o5L
i1
l
i
NOTICE Ur PUBLIC 0AARINGS ON YROPOSED ANNLxATION
NOTICE IS HER.8Y GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS Mrs
The City of Denton, Texas, pcopases to institute annexation
proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to aCd the
following deacrloed territory to the corporate limits of the City
of Denton, to-witr
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas and tieing part of the 1.
Coy Survey, Abstract 212, J. Ayeca Survey, Abstract 2, M. Burleson
Survey, Abstract 93, Be Burleson Survey, Abstract 449 and the R.
Jonneon Survey, Abstract 666 and mots particularly described as
follower
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point lying
in the North boundary line of the tract described In Ordl.:anco No.
69-40, Tract Vi, said point lying 350 feet West of and
perpendicLolar to the center line of -351
THENCE Northerly, 350 feet West of and parallel to the center line
of I-35 the following four (4) coursea and distances-
(1) NORTH 10 58' West, a distance of 20195,71 feet, (2) North
00 53' Feat, a distance of 6,168.64 feet) (3) North 90 02'
West, a distance of 5,202.791 (4) North 20 50' West, a distance
of 4,903.16 feet to a point for a cornea
THENCE North 870 10' East, passing at 350 feet the center line
of I-35 and continuing for a total distance of 700 feet to a puint
for a corner, said point lying 350 feat Bast of cad perpendicular
to the center line of I-351
THENCE Southerly, 350 feet East of and parallel to the center line
of 1-35 the following four (4) courses and distances)
(1) SOUTH 20 50' East, a distance of 4,865.44 feet) (2) South
90 02' Bastr a distance of 51225,71 feet) (3) South 00 53'
West, a distance of 60211.96 feet, (4) South 10 58' East, a
distance of 2,192.29 feet to a point for a corner in the present
city limits, said point lying in the North line of a tract
described in Ordinance 69-40, Tract VII
THENCE South 880 02' West, along said present city limits,
psss:ng at 350 feet the center line of I-35 and continuing for a
total distance of 700 feet to the place of beginning and
containing 296.97 acres of land more or less.
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Cuurneil
of the City of Dor.ton, Texas, un the day of ,
19850 at 700 o'clock P, M. in the CIEy-'Council Caaam`sers`or-Me
Municipal Building of th-1 City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
place all such persons ■hall have the right to appear and mi
heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested it,
the things and matturo herein mentioned, will take notice.
A Public Hearing will be held by Ind before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of ,
1985, at 7100 O'clock P. M, in the C ti y-Council. C AFiAM,47 O the
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said tie* and
plhca.all such persons shall have tEe right to appear end bs
A• tL
r
F
heard, Of Aii said matters and tnings$ all persc,ns intt~rested in
the thinga and matters nersin mentioned$ will take noti,e.
MCHARD . STEKARTp FlJ1MA
CITY OF DENTONo TEBA'3
ATTERTi
A T E AL ENi CITY ]~(j
A, 1, N~ . .h'°' ! V 1 • .v t~ d , ,v i I: , C3 i; ~~~1
c n C 1 ~qf~q w•~yk k "I'~~ N. i. u~aM. r. ~ ' ~~t
t a o
i
Crow Wrldhte: Rd C"O o N Sanger city limits
S rt1J I r o n r R d.
f+•
dlOAeel ~Rd, 8~/r r Rae 1;1 RJ k.•r;i`n`rrRinr~'
I'r it Rd
c u In► a Rd. f . o • `L
• tdrfh Rd;y,~ ?[wig w. •JJ4iv. {WW MIL .r,x
d H ineR B!u? Mound .r "far
s
#4*1 ~
Present Dentin City Lim SO so ad
s• •Genr.f Rd •4~t0a Ad ,
I 9i,
j 7
i 1 I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ her • ~ ~ ~
44
S
FS
• Orr q lld. ; of dnCh d $ rinoi Rd 16 no
!
INS
KRU
110p 454
/ • f~ ~ ~a00•1~01! ~ JV r ~ •r i
a aki it • r
yJ • 6 f
/ • f. a ',N MAI
/l•0 o es l
rJf! J • ,
f~ .
cis
0 y
14
40
t ~ i4yf w AI r } • ~ ,
' ~.N fir.. ~ `S, , ; ~ ' ~ w ' r-,..,•a-.a...~.~.
dI,
tl I • o' Yeti : PA. , • ,
eo lit
y 77_77"7" '_'",pe.YtSF ' mil` ~Tld p ."'4^ss y- f u,i ` T 'hAV~ •FY?61:f ~C^ T Tr 3:~ i {i4 i'. i i a"S_'"
A-26
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
September 23, 1985 Submit agenda item
September 24, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
* October 1, 1985 City Council sets date, time and place
for public hearing
October 2, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
October 4, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
October 7, 1185 Submit agenda item
October 8, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
* October 15, 1985 City Council holds first PlIblic hearing
October 16, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
October 18, 1985 Puolish notice and mailout
October 28, 1985 Submit agenda item
October 29, 1985 Submit agenda baCk-up
' November 51 1985 City Council holds second public nearing
November 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
November 121 1985 Submit agenda back-up
* November 19, 1986 City Council institutes annexation
proceedings
November 21, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Aecord Chronicle
November 24, 19d5 PUbiish ordinance
December 3U, 1985 Submit agenda item
December 31, 1965 Submit agenda back-up
* January 7, 19d6 Final action by City Council
* oenotes action oy the City Council
G964g
1
DAVE? 10/al/e~
CITY COUNCIL PI PORT FORMAT
TOI Mayor and Members of the City Council I.
FROMS Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS CONCERNING THE PETITION OF SH?1UL Ce BARUCH FOR VOLUNTARY
ANNEXATION OF 92,80 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHWAY 77 APPROXIMATELY
1,050 FEET EAST OF I-35o (A-28)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that public hearings be held on October 15 and
November 5, 1985, at 7:00 peme in the Council Chambers at the
Municipal BGllding.
SUMMARY:
Annexation and light industrial (LI) zaniei is being requested for
the abovs referenced tract. Approximately 1645 acres already in the
city limits and adjacent and north of Highway 77 abuke this tract to
the southe
BACKGROUND:
This site is located in a high and low intensity area, Annexation
and land sale activity has increased in the general vicinity of the
Texas Instruments property and future Loop 288.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS A110ECTEDs
No existing housing or population is locsted within the area
proposed for hnnexation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined.
R e- s mit
r;,,
P Nepared by: Rick Svehla
QJ J &-rr. Acting City Manager
David Ell son
Senior Planner
Appro d
Jeff Mey
Director of Planning
and Paveloprent
0972]
v.=`Fe-~--.r -T---t-,Q -,li'_
1207E
NO.
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
TH'd PROPUSEJ ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN BY
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR
TO PUBLISH NOTICE Of SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THE CITY COUNCIL 0jP THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
On the day of , 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P. M.
In the City Council Chem6vi*i oZ the Municipal Building of the City
of Uenton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing
giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on
the proposed annexation t-y the City of Denton, Texas of the
property described below.
On the day of 1985, at 7s00 o'clock P.M.
in the City Council Cnambess o the cnicipal Building of the City
of Denton, Taxes, the Cify Council will hold a public nearing
giving all interested parsons the right to appear ani be heard on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
following described pro;ert;(, to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being iiituated
in the County of Denton, Slate of Texas, and being part o4 the A.
White Survey, Abstract 1406, the M. May Survey, Abstract 807 and
the S. Johnson Survey, Abstract 683 and being more particularly
described as follows
BEGINNING at a point in the present city lirits as established by
ordinance No. 82-4, said point almo lying S00 feet North of and
perpendicular to the cantos line of U.S. Highway 77 and thr most
Easterly Southeast corner of the tract described in Ordinanco No.
83.27;
THENCE North 0' 19' 11' East, paeniny at 69.05 feet the Easterly
Northeast corner of the tract described in Ordinance No. 83-27,
and continuing for a total distanois of 1,017.86 feet to a point
for a corner in the North boundary line of said White Survey, said
point also being the Southwest vorner of the M. May Survey,
Abstract 807 and the Southeast corner of the S. Johnson Survey,
Abstract 6831
THENCE North 88' 37' 15' West slang the North boundary line of
said White Survey, same being thn South boundary line of said
Johnson Survey, a distance of 126.61 feet to a point for a corner)
THENCE North 06 17' 21' East, a distance of 1,062.95 feet to a
point for s corner;
THENCE South 89' 31' 39' East, a distance of 2,I8SX, feet to a
point for a cornea
THENCE South 0* 22' 27' West, a distance of 561.11 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE North 89' 27' 00' Wash a distance of 1,033.1 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE; South Of 12' 28' West, a distance of S06.g6 feet to a point
for a corner, in the South, boundary line of the said may Survey,
same baing the North boundary line of the said White StirvAyf
' A,"
'h. 1 .r v .r •e4 q r; a 4~ , i. J , a. ~r 1..:'~. "5'k
THENCE South 0" 25' W Nest, a diutarsCs of 1,845.44 feet to a
point for a cornet in the present city limits as established by
Ordinance No. 82-4, said point $00 feet Nortn of and perpendicular
to the center line of U.S. Highway 771
THENCE North 580 14' 51" West, 500 feet North of and ,+rallel to
the center line of U.S, Highway 77 and with said city limits a
distance of 866.58 feet to a point)
THENCE North 58" 22" $7" West continuing along said liner a
distance of 679.55 feet to the place of begin;.ng and co,itoining
92.8 acres of land more oc was.
SECTION II.
Thl Mayor of the City of uuncon, Texas, is nwreby autnoti:ed
and directed to cause notice of sucn public nearings to be
published once in a new.papat naving general circulation in the
City and in toe aoove descr bad territory not more than forty days
not leas than twenty days prior to the data of such public
hearings, all in accordance situ the Municipal Annexation Act
(Article 970a, Vernon's Taxas Civil Statutes),
SECTION III.
This ordinance snail be in full force and effect immediately
following its paeeage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD O. : ' ART. MAY OR
CITY OF DENTONo TEXP.S
ATTESTI
'Cr AR TE ALLEN, CITY SLCRRETAR7
CITY OF DEN'TONo TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONr TEXAS
BYE%1. ' .'L 2
rt :'ice
S p a
, r~"• S' 't x~. , y 1 i~f r~f 9'.'f ff ~M" f r E..
'y
1207E
NOTICE OF PU841C HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THATI
The City of Oenton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the
following described territory to the corporate Limits of the City
of Denton, to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Ue,i^on, State of Texas, and being part of the A.
White Survwy, Aostract 1406, the M. May Survey, Abstract 807 and
the S. Johnson Survey, Abstract 683 and being more particularly
described as followss
BEGINNING at a point in the present cit limits as established by
ordinance No. 82-41 said point also lying 500 feet North of and
perpendicular to the center line of U48, Highway 77 and the most
Easterly Southeast corner of the tract described ii, ordinance No.
83-21i
THENCE North 06 19' 11" East, passing at 69.05 feet the Easterly
Northeast corner of the tract described in Ordinance No, 63-27,
and continuing for a total distance of 1,047.86 feet to a point
for a corner in the North boundary line of said White Survey, said
point also being the Southwest Corner of the .4. May Survey,
Abytcaut 807 and the Southeast corner of tn• S. Johnson Survey,
Abstract 683
THENCE North P8" 37' 15" West along the iocth boL+ndary line of
said White Survey, same being the South ooundacy line of said
Johnson 5jur,rey, a distance of 126.61 feet to a point for a corners
THENCE North 00 17' 21" East, a distance of 1,062.95 feet to a
point for a corners
THENCE Louth 890 31' 39" East, a distance of 2,485.31 feet to a
point for a cornerr
THENCE South 00 22' 27" Welt, a distance of 564.11 feet to a point
for a corners
THENCE North 890 27' 00" West, a distance of 1,033.4 feet to a
point for a corners
T39NCE South 00 22' 28" West, a distance of 506.06 feet to a point
for a corner In the South boundary line of the said May Survey,
same being the North boundary line of the said White Sutveyj
THENCE South 0" 25' 59" West, a distance of 1,845.44 feet to a
point for a corner in the present city limits as established by
Ordinance No. 82-4, said point 500 feet North of and perpendicular
tr, the center line of U.S. Highway 77)
THENCE North $801 14' S1" West, 500 feet North of and parallel to
the center line of U.S. Highway 77 and with said city limits a
distance of 866.58 feet to a point)
THENCE North 580 22' 57" West continua:.; along said lines a
distance of 679.55 feet to the place of Leyitininq and containing
92.8 acres of land more or less.
A Public Hearing will be held by and before t,1e City Council
of the City of Denton, Texak+, on the day of ,
19850 at 7100 o'clock P. M. it the City Council Cnam scs o e
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas# for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation, At snit 'time and
place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
heard. of oil said matters and things, all persons interested in
the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
R•~o
is Wx •.I4 i,.` X .i 'A~-~~f ~~':p ~r p. k.
A Public Nearing will be held by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texaso on the day of ,
1900 at 700 o'clock P. M, in the C tf y Council Cnam ere o the
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At sa+i time and
place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in
the things and matters hareir. mentioned, will take notice.
RIC RD 0. STE ART, KA R
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, IT SE T
14 1. 1
• iM 1'70.1
( • 11114 fS1.1 v,ryl t1 11.11 NM Is FI 1. "m Attn. HCn.f
1.1 101111'M 1N IIAT a" N. 1 4+ltn 1 rf,
r 441-At u1, ArFN .µr.•1, 11111,
a 1,41 f 1. re 1pra IKf NfaKIL U/lVI fyr II Ilr, rvl:1M
1. wire ♦hll, lil"A, M, I.+•, 1n 1.
41". ul +N 10.11. rbb,:
~~s jj~r Jj Ilt :hNN 1!'4p. 411 rIrl .II, mole .t"m'
.I
IaIUIJ•nf J{/f.f/ II f. MAY stn Kr r AesTAecr eor Qr. IL,N r.,t as ,rl •L,,
x I' MI N ksl f, NPIt 1 4CIIt11.111. 1J ..rM i.
Ae?TRAC • 68D r:.0 VIM :4NWas Lf want Afi':. oR:n.' h w,, 'a "r~4.
"Al 8.111 AKIUtI Is IKy I'
1 _ Ieelae if nl 011tr11'r to$Al of ms at ""M q 14 "1
j 1 tirl 0 Mn n:n Alm,
At i A No* t 0.4N. 11 N9Il11 1, CAUL 4N 11 ,hual 111t I •nT14A
.p1 IF .t•, y star m y ;K. f:p
1 x • +f,t 1170'00 90.1111 I•;xfU tl. o.y It 4 olw+
r 1 rr ,IHI, ,1 rlf/ toy Il. lq 1
f~~-.•- -
411 Yt~f' 11 r,l•1M6'f•OH<ltq ll rlK9111119 1
Irmkl bil lrli't..l
I I` .1 ..4t. 11 1011 000 M :M 111 1I rtl will L:lo if J 1Ll KN,
Matt tfltrl i0 'L'U111t 4:x•ll M4 .1 Isms
,Ip,t ens s y ¢t by 11'A14N1 U/ ,M 1 n a y ,1/
mitt At111 II 11s111I v .',II
Mr" yf 1,00 >L.pt1y .r ! I HY.!
W 1,41
A MHITf 1W7VtY A95TRACT 1400 !11 .1 1 A y t►N S, Mai N170 M MlYYI to 41Wn1 1" 14 IbA1M 111 t t ,r.r a
W ,N.N NO, h y IN /III
} 9 M1tl }11.1 N 1441CM 11 0%%110 4M It 11fulfl of.? 1 l,,fw I
d INLN Not ad Pam U 1 IMn fl'kWr N 1 'N
0 to IT,If 011101 fan lYl n. Ml%'.O, 1U, /1.4 1. tYtl .1 rt
f~ M,I C+►L11,1 N 1, 1. LCC141f 111
NIKI bin N WISH 14 11r111t m 11 la" III, UK ~a
1.1111% MOIM Cin 6"t 4llsul y f11M1lL n "N .I1:1
LM a .3. 414411 rr A 9111we It N•,'./ 1111 It 1 "It,
1MR1 701,4 N 1441/!111 •;6111 had it l'/.G0111t.'f rt
Elastic 111.111. tart t111t 11%1tl had /4LL'.lfl all It ,10!ts
t:M OF 1.11 1k i441 11 1 aJ.'44ti of 111.11 at as 1 Kr
Mk \ Mltl fa!11Is AcNfl tl 4111 M 11 Nf:1lf 1.! 4411-WO
ly A tN1A• ItU A M as '1_44IPtn;A 11 al;•;r,v R.N
~~1` 1 • / ,1 4111 W GFI.
IU rw l.,11 eq t+n
~t f
\1 00'70
a-28
AAh4:GdY.aM d
-Y F ot~ surrr N{MMETT G NAINI INC. Y2.~01k11~i Ik mitt f
11a 11 t77NSUt1t4G (AAUPS 4 Y ICA ?Kt A on Wmt gjw, A! I40g 1
alt ICri1,W1 f lJPot1OM rLmlUl1 tool b 1 144 ll L A11190N WN U Wt h-" 0"OS TLf/,
0. ~,I
{ji ! : 9 . Sir R 1 . ~4. S t i9 G' c n f ;B i.
A-28
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
Septemoer 23, 1985 Submit agenda item
September 24, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
* October 'l, 1985 City'Council sets date, time and place
for public hearing
October 2, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
October 4, 1985 Publish notice and mailout
Octooer 70 1985 Submit agenda item
October 8, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
Octooer 15, 1985 City Council holds first public hearing
October 16, 1985 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
October 18, 1985 Publish notice and mbilout
October 26, 1985 Suoinit agenda item
October 29, 1985 Submit ayenua back-up
* Novemlter 5, 1965 City Council folds second public hearing
Novemoer ill 1985 Submit agenda item
Noveizer 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
i Noven)er 191 1986 City Council institutes annexation
proceedings
November 21, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle
NoVevibar 24, 1985 ilublisn ordinance
December 3U, 1985 Submit agenda item
December 31, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
* Jtinuary 7, 1986 Pinal action by City Council
" Denotes action by the city Council
0964g
y
6AT11 10/01/65
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
!1~
I
PROM1 Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECTt ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE] TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS CONCERNING VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 59.6 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FM 2164 (NORTH LOCUST) AND
PROPOSED LOOP 288 AND LYING AND BEING PART OF THE re TOBY SURVEYo
ABSTRACT 128E (A-:9).
RECOMMENDATIONt
Staff recommends that public hearings be held on October 15 and
November 5, 1985, at 7100 p.m, in the Council Chambers at the
municipal Building.
SUMMARYI
Mel R. Lacquemont, Planning and Zontng Consultant$ has submitted an
annexation petition for the above referenced parcel in behalf of the
owners of a total 412 acre parcel. The purpose of the annexation is
to include all subject property in a pending mixed use zoning
proposal. The 55 acres in question begins adjacent and north of
proposed Loop 288 and west of P.M. 2164.
BACKGROUNDt
This site is located in a low intensity area pi,edominantly with a
moderate intensity node located at the intersection of proposed Loop
288 and F.M. 2164.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS APE CTED,t
No existing housing or population is lncludtid in the area proposed
for annexation
FISCAL IMPACTt
Re ect y su ltt~da
Prepared by: Rink Svehla
h44 MclAng City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Appr ed s
Jeff. Mey
Director of Planning ,
and 0eyeiopmene.
12166
Xp '.1 R l W~ 7, 4k F;r R. r .1 1d' G. ~ 1~~ . J 4 ,ar A:
i2oe
NO.
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOX PUBLIC HEARINGS UN
THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCA113ED HEREIN BY
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING PHE MAYOR
TO PUBLISH NOTICE Of SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY or OENTON ESEREBY ORDAINSI
SECTION 1.
On the day of , 1985, at 7100 o'clock P. M,
in the City ounoll Chambersof tn* MunLoipal Building of the City
of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing
giving all interested persons the eight to appoar and be neacd on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
property descrioed below.
On the day of , 1965, at 7100 o'clock P.M.
In the City ouncil Chsmbers of the `X niclpai Building of the City
of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public nearing
giving all interested person. the right to appear and be neard on
the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the
following descrloed property) to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being pact of the T.
Toby Survey, Aostcact 1288 and more particularly described as
follows)
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by
ordinance No. 74-36, Tract ills said point lying SOD feet West of
and perpendicular to the center line of State Hwy. FM 2164 and in
the North boundary line of said Toby Survey]
THENCE South 1'14' West, along said present city limits, :500 feet
West of parallel to tae center line of FM 2164, a distance of
103,39 feet to a point for a cognate said point lying 600 feet
North of and perpendicular to the center line of State Hwy, Loop
288 and in the present city limits as estaolisnad by Ordinance 140,
82-51
THENCE Westerly along said present city limits, 6UO feet North of
and parallel to toe center line of Loop 260 the followings
1, westerly along a curve with a radius of 6,319.59 feet,
central angle of 16427149' and a chord of South
90431152.°.' west, 2,020,9 feet, an ace distance of 2,039.1
feet,
2. South 7101715V West, a distance of 1,195.3 feet to the
beginning of a curve,
3, westerly along a curve with a radius of So129,i8 feet,
central angle of 1S4351374 and a chord of South
19005146,50 west, 1,391,76 feet, an ato distance of
1,391.16 feet to a point for a corner in the west boundary
line of said Toby SurveyE
THENCE North 0•S11060 8ast1 along the West boundary line of said
survey, a distance of 1,126.21 feet to the Nortnwest corner of
said Toby Sufveyi
THENCE !South 400462' Eeot, along the worth boundary line of..*ald
Toby Sut`vey, a ?)stance of 41304,46 feet to the place of bo4;Aing
and centainlr4 59.6 acres of land more of lees,
Vr ",k
J
SECTION i1.
• The Mayor of the City of Oenton, Texas, is hereby autnc~rtzed
and directed to cause notice of such public nearings to be
puolisned once in a newspaper having general circulation ih the
City and in the above described territoty not a»re than forty day$
nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such Fublic
hearings, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act
(Article v70a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes).
SECTION ill.
Tnis ordinance nn,zll be in full force and effect immediately
following its passage and approval.
PASSED /.ND APPROVkD this the day of , 1y85.
R-a. D 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CIT.. OF UENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CHARLOTTE A LEN, CNT SECRETAR
CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FURMt
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OFF DENTON, TEXAS
Byt
Z. a et. ° M f Tf vn r~ i _ •
=G ors b'. . 4 ' t' 4
1206E
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGB ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT:
US City of Denton, Texas, propOSea to institute annexation
proceedings to alter the ooundary limbs of said City to add the
following described territory to the corporate Limits of the City of
Denton, to-wit:
Ail that certain tract or parcel of land lying and oeing situated in
the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the T. Toby
survey, Aostract 1288 and note particularly described As follows:
BEGINNING et a point in the present city limits as establisred oy
Ordinance No. 74-360 Tract III0 said point lying $00 feet West of
and perpendicular to the center line of State Hwy, FM 2164 Ana in
the Nnrtn boundary line of said Toby Surveys
THENCE South 1414' West, along said present city limits, 500 feet
West of parallel to the center line of FM 2164, a distance of 103.39
feet to a point for a corner, said point lying 600 feet North of and
perpendicular to the center line of State Hwy, Loop 288 and in the
present city limits as establisned by Ordinance No. 82-5r
THENCE Westerly along said present city limits, 600 feet Nortn of
ar,d parallel to the center line of Loop 288 the following:
it Westerly along a curve with a radius of 6,329.58 feet,
central angle of L8627149" and a cnord of Soutn 80831152,5"
West, 2,030.9 teat, an arc distance of 20039.7 feat,
2. Soutn 71017158" pleat, a distance Of 1,105.3 feet to the
beginning of a curve,
3. Westerly along a curve with a radius of 5,129.58 feet,
central angle of !5035137" and a cnord of Soutn 79405146.5"
West, 1,391.76 feet, an ace distance of 1,391.76 feet to a
point for a cornier In the west boundary line of said Toby
Surveys
THENCE North 0057106" East, along the West boundary line of said
survey, a distance of 1,126.21 feet to the Northwest corner of said
Tooy Survey]
THENCE South 89104'32" East, along the North boundary line of said
Tooy Survey, a distance of 40396.46 feat to the pace of beginning
and containing 59.6 acres of land mono or lets.
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of
the City of Denton, Texas, On the day of , 19850
at 7s00 o'clock P, M, in the City ouneil Chambers o the Munlaipal
auiiding of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in
the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such
persons shall nave the light to appear and no heard. Of all said
matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters
herein mentioned, will take notice.
A Puolio Hearing will oe held by and before the City Council of
the City of Denton, TexaS, On the day of , 19650
at 7:00 o'olock P. N, in the City 70 ncll Cnombers o the unicipal
Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in
the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all suen
persons shall nave the right to appear and be heard. Of all said
matters and tnings, all persons Interested in the Lnings and matters
nerein mentioned, will take notice.
r:
CITY Of DUMP TEXAS
ATTEST:
)
t , CITY SECIMART
Mai
A-297p
IC
lh[r~uwt f
ua~0
to SM
N. Woe. R
Rtt~M~~n
CITYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (8171566-8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 24, 1985
TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Roger N. Wilkinson, Right of Wa.y Agent
SUBJECT: Abandonment of Easement
The City of Denton Utility Department, electric division
acquired ower line facilities and easements from Denton County
Electric Loop. The facilities have been removed which cross a
tract recently subdivided, Northwood 10th installment.
The owners have requested the easement across their property to
be abandoned. The electric division concur with this request
and wish to have it released,
Roger N. Wilkinson
Right of Way Agent
is
10319E
't n~ ayL ~k ~,E_ a oft .".w w ~ ~ti 4 eA 'tY i. e .r x[,j'
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ABk:DONING AND VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENTS AS
DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARINO AN EFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas has
determined that the hereinafter described utility easements are no
longer needed for public uses and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Texas Revised
Civil Statutes, Article 542le-120 an appraisal of the fair market
value of said easements has been obtainedl and
WHEREAS, In accordance with state law, laid easements are
being abandoned and vacated in consideration of the receipt of
their fair market value by the abuttng property owner thereof#
Now, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY OROAINSs
SECTION I.
Tnat' the hereinafter described easements are abandoned and
vacated as an easement for public utilitisss
Right-of-way easement as described in a deed from 0. L.
Morgan, and wife, Edna Morgan to Denton County Electric
Cooperative, Inc., dated April 16, 1940, recorded in
Volume 4030 Page 291, of the Deed Records of Denton
County, Texas, and being the same rignt-of-way easement
assigned by Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc. to
the City of Denton, Texas, by instrument dated, September
16, 1985, recorded in Volume 1123, Page 635 of the Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas.
SECTION II.
That said easement is herein abandoned and vacated, and by
operation of lav, the City of Denton's property interest in said
easement shall revert to the abutting property owner, whatnot one
or more, and the City of Denton hereby releases any and all claims
to the use of the property described in said easements referenced
herein for the purposes therein described,
SECTION IIIs
That this ordinance shall become effective Immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED thiJ the day of 1985.
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
ATTESTi
CH RLOTTE XLLENs CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORMs
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY KTTORHEY
CITY Of DENTON; TEXAS
BY$
s ey w 1 r (i~ i t r r n, 9 ` ~f i
CITYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) S66-8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 21, 198S
TO., Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Roger Nilkinson, Right of Way Agent
SUBJECT: Drainage Easement abandonment (Oakridge Estates)
Joe Jeter, developer of Onkridge Estates, has requested a
drainage easement to be abandoned which lies on Lot 23, Block
2, This easement was originally designated for a concrete
flume for offslte 1rainage. When construction began it was
determined that it would be better to install the drainage
flume on lots 24 and 37.
This easement has not or will not be needed in the future for
drainage improvements.
Roger N. Wilkinson
Right of Way Agent
is
00319E
4 w :k W s y a' ti `4'' x ray w.
1~i i. I H ~ 1, IF
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A DRAINAGE
EASEMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUrHORIBING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE A QOI%LAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND
INTEREST OF THE CITY IN SAID EAST4ENT TO THE OWNER OF THE
TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED BY SAID EASEMENTS AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City COU.oil of the City of Denton, eating
,)ursuant to law, and upon the request and petition of the
grantee herein, deems it advisable to abandon and conveyy the
hereinafter described trac4 of land to grantee end is of the
opinion that said drainage easement is not needet! for public
use, and tn, : same should be abandoned and quitclaim. to Joe
D. Deter, a,. hereinafter providedl and
a9EREASF the City Council of the City of Denton is of the
Opilion that the best interest and wnifaro of the public will
be served by at ndoning and conveying the same to Joe D. Jeter,
for the :onsiddration hereinafter more fully sat (orth? NOW,
THEREFORE,
i'HE COJNCIL OF THE CITY OF USNTON HEREBY OROAINSt
SECTION I.
That the following described tract of land in the City of
Fenton bo and the same is hereby abandoned, vacated and closed
inso'ar as the right, title and interest of the public are
con.etnedt
The east sixteen (16) .eet of Lot No. 23, Block 2 of the Oak
Rid 99a Estates shown as a drainage easement designated and
deOicated to the public by plat filed of record in Cabinet D,
Page 111 )n May 171 1994 in the plat records of Denton County,
Texasl said plat being part of the tract or parcel of land
lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton,
State of Texas, and being part of the R. S. Longoottom Survey,
Abstract No. 77S and being all or part of that tract of land
as conveyed from Richard Leo Smith to Joe D. Jeter by deed
dated January 11F 1984, recorded in Volume 1322, Page 830 4
the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas.
SECTION II.
That the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby euthot:_►d to
execute and deliver that certain quitclaim deed attacned hereto
and incorporated herein conveying said drainage casement
described therein to Joe D, Jeter.
SECTION III.
That portion of the public drainage easement herein
described being vacated, abandoned, and closed is made subject
to all existing zoning regulations and deed reatticti<,os, if
any, and subject to sll existing easement rights of others, if
any, whether apparent or not,
I
SECTION IV.
This ordinance shall take offeet and be in full force and
effect from and after the date of its Pataage, and it is so
ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1985.
e
A
RICHARD . TE ART, MAYO
CITY OF DENTONj TEXAS
ATTEM
CHARLOTTE ALLENo CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTONt TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHt CITY AT'T'ORNEY
CITY OF DENTONg TEXAS
BY g x/41 All
PACK t
i
ry Iiiii-im rtialYStlMtM oasis
t+any ere„o.aeeW
r-- '-•i -sir L„.-.
~hp tuft of &X000 tlDgl X111 den 6 ter re>gnte:
0093dg of DENTON
• 3 That The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation
of the County of Denton and State of Taxes for and in consideration of
the sum of Ten and No/100 ($10.00) DOLLARS
to it In hand paid by Joe D. Jeter
of the County of Denton anS State of Texas the receipt of which
Is hereby acknowledged, do by these presents BARGAIN, SELL, RELEASE, AND FOREVER
QUIT CLAIM unto the sald Joe D. Jeter
his heirs and assigns, all its right, title and Interest In and to that certain tract or
parcel of land lying In the County of Denton , State of Texts, described as follows, to-wit,
The east sixteen (14) feet of Lot No. 23, Block 2 of the Oak Ridge
Estates shown as a drainage easement designated and dedicated to the
public by plat filed of record In Cabinet D, Page 111 on May 17, 1984
in the plat records of Denton County, Texasl said plat being part of
the tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and
County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the R. B,
LOngbottom survey, Abstract No. 775 and being all or part of that
i tract of land as conveyed from Richard Loo Smith to Joe D. Jolter by
deed dated January 11, 1984, recorded in Volume 1122, Page 830 of the
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas.
1
j
" I
i
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, together with all and singular the rights, privileges
and appurttnances thereto is any manner betnogint unto the said Joe D. Jolter, his
heirs and uafgr, forever, so that neither Grantor the said
f City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation, its successors or
assigns
nor ittillmtxc any person or persons claiming under it shall, at say time
ittreafter, have, claim, or demand any right or title to the aforesaid premises or appurtenances, or any
part lhca,of.
W17NESS our hand at Denton, Texas this
day of A. D. 19 85
Witness at request of Crantor; THECIITY,Of DLNTONt,„TE?~AS
A TT E 9 T t
gYc.,.... .jjCM..jY....gftW1';"A1f811....._
f
z=_CMXR GTTE ALlr£N, CITY,SPCR]11161Y ,
! ~1 toorr
.p iN Otte irks ti;N .a
Zeros, t:).~•I/r M•r «ar~ ls trl AAAIII
J of Is the 411 ff/r J.Lr 1
_ .J S - ! -Y 3, ii::i♦tIeyi iaifi~r
S i l l
raa0 a~_'"• JU . EL11~911 R11►rN L. f `~f 1MIp1~~ rep
I r! ~L~
1 097 I M1Nt I 1 =f Malawi ,)1INi III
SHERMAN D. ADR1S50N 1041A LINDA ,''7C 1R'. fJ Iu1!!11 1
IIC or S) ~r1 9 10 1 pnN of nl 6610 fT]IM.
0610 0010 HI► A. 1111
y ,`„r n 14111 plot M blerall I•
1•. / rIH0N0 r 11 l.l)
aSa 1-tNE M{ 1 4r .,1 rrLL,
V 1 I. 1 11 1 T Y Y A P or or
r -erlt Poo et- 6!)•11'00C Ill./f fawp1 S 11103,0! r 6111,
1' r. ` ' r .a•~+r ff•
r 111tH lost !6161 rM fM
cnr Is li 01+, 7•1 a. 0+ .Tu ' 1 ri1
KY r.rQ Mlna k
r~r I"11/ Tl 11p HpN % I0
1 R
t A
7181 RUCt mo lovill p 01tr1y If
r_1 ff everso ry. 1109
~0 6.60.6 01 0i 000 10 101 1
r~, 911A N0r W1 N[
It _~i. i _i ___la 1
lisp too ease 1NR71lease so t/iii f C
i. n.' + n1 u •I~ ru•.a 14 1roe me 111 rme to
t to.
ILL (Off LAND
f 12 / 371 3 _ . . ♦ r 1 b ' 12 ' MI rots /NU /1 Col nlf it
# 1 17 • r~ I f1 i I )D i r " J 6660.6 hf ll♦r.01 lslp
1 '1 Y . I- ,npl MI .IM1 1 fr
V r IuI r O ?WRll ►♦rt1 It sterols 1'
Polio it I Do# V f r 11 11 • 66.611 nel Oin$ H I I.
s Y S I t t t Y 1 f 1( 1• • O 1.11K 1I 01 ?*are" 1
lA O It Inl rl 1618 rreal 0•4 0f f IN
1 I ,0100 r3 Y
4 : ' O • I i 11 ! jN uii iri i~ is N if" IS
O ,1 1 M\ . ~Anti aL 11 fi61l
_ r O t • trls " n. to-At t 1 a. 0•
t r~,. ~ I . f"~ V r~1 n W
r _....-0. O ) V " 1 1 C : 'j . e
# a 111 11' Q
1
t t I : t! • ; Z 6'ae w.,.. n „ h< 1lrplr7 000 it If 61 a"
tY It r • • 10 < So Ilsl f )l f"41. 11N•
1; u y fe.c'f we It LI br tIN t•
is • K of • l o W 1 O • n I I ( 11 V to
• .1 , L , 1 / 91 O tr.. pot n{f It ~Ir Mt'
1 i • # 1 r: 4 1 a •1 rr J Y M &Ilk frut a dill eo I
t f!(' 1 Ill '
`,/F C. J t I ' f l 11, . n .♦i . 14 4. veep" prlf 11 ON 'e
. m r i a )11.11 k01 N MDnf N
P to
~l r.,rl R S I .i I S " y~j.r" y I ~ '
m Eel,, do •,n „~a., L. • '/~01 1.1.1 1.lieeI Irate
0), 11' 3 2"f r2 Of/ ` Y11
R. . e ` i / + • fRRI Isr 11 tl'trtH0/ 1
brad 1 • t t r fr«Ir ON' t rrr. I
J r . ii 4.y, tyn •1• • K ~ r ~ JJ . IM IN In, I/.II. 1!161 to)
1)
to 0.r . w ♦ i
r • . ~ ~ n f • . r r , 091 110! ALL
11 r I/ I I .0; 1 t ti ,l + 1. tx(trlolr.
'+n w l_ ",.'t 1r''• 1 ,l'• I r f .7 )i•+
1 r
rfl Jot 16001 II tN
1 " tf. 1 w. -L'._3,+' N I2+ p f +.ril n04lln.6 la
or rr' r oI'1/"M S 71.415 !'f Tr.er, In♦ AS 11061.0 Irll
_ 0 A K 6 N I R [ nn Il . ,1. + r♦lel r•♦♦ 0.,l. no. 0.0009.
• r M
• 1 Ifi r1 !~H~ It i. anri t{~ ~1 • I.,~_... ' N 1. J
~ I 1 2 ~~1•+r 1 ~ 2 ° 1 1 ct ',`!IrO 111+' AII M ' 11~1 NN1N .r...,
L C
I .lsr I r I w 000 at
` • o ' ' j, ff its at ,toil
' ~1• MR3"6 1 n21•09 211 70' '1•61 l7•I2't1".M• 61/1116 too v 71111I0• ,'i 10 • II r1 1741 Or com"or lUtOr
E f1+p1 r 111 t0.' < rlI
.J e• r
NARLAN W outt RIe/1ARo 14vtoN aARr N, RIRCN012 the "No , r,: y n IN AN fN2ae r, ,wI «iieifl
ISi 1 i51 ION / Ir r' I..' o t
450 of too -•1„ Y~ Ili
%L' • t or 17 Of% •N 12/ / to 1' 09• • [ r.0. . 110 NIN•1Igor 7.
p, IOC.! O'• 1f , 610 fiord
150 01 R QA&
~VROYI&P ' !r . 1 ' rRC r -N 12p?1/'07'1! 11 V
11e, $O 1
I i 1011 / I ..,.,.,..r...,.. 41111, some Ior
DATE1 10/01/85
SITT COUX916 RSPOR? PORMk!
L
Tot Mayor and Members of the City Counoii
`
FROMi Rick Svehla, Acting city Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING PARAGRAPH B OF ARTICLE 21 OF
APPENDIX B-ZONING OF THE CODE OF QRDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON
RELATING TO THE APPROVAL BY THE CITY Cl OF PLATS WITHIN AN AREA
WHERE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ARE PENDINGX AND PROVIDING AN gFFECTIVj
DATE
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission rtno:mends approval. The City
Council held a public hearing and voted to approve the ordinance at
its meeting of September 17, 1985.
~8X=
Recommendation of repeal of this ordinance is based on the attached
legal opinion. Essentially, review and approval of plate cannot be
delayed pending annexation if the development complies with City of
Denton Subdivision Regulations,
aACdGROUND:
. '.tir. _ :,a °''.•j~ "`fib; «,«w,%a.»~€~,r I
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR (AMPS AFFECTED:
Developers property in extraterritorial jurisdiction, City
Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, and staff
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
R. ly eu itt
Rick Svehla
Peepared by, Acting City Manager
David Etlison
Senior Planner
Approv
Jeff Meye
Director of Planning
and Development
13298
1007L
NO.
AN Oy9INANCE REPEALING PARAGRAPH B OF ARTICLE 21 OF APPENDIX
B-ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DLNTON
RELATING TO THE APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PLATS OF
SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN AN AREA WHERE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ARE
PENDING; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That paragraph B of Article 21. of Aprandi:c B-toning of the
Code of Ordinances which reads as follows;
B. The planning and zoning commission of the City of
Denton shall not approve any plat of any subdivision
within any area where a petition or ordinau.ce for
annexation or a recommendation for annexation to the
City of Benton Is panding before the %ity council,
unless and until such plat shall have been approved
by resolution by the airy council.
is tLoraby repealed.
SECTION It.
That this ordinance shall becowe effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARDO. A Tj MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
Y
CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL, FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTIVO CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY; '
I T!
1
Ctr*e OF DBNro.'4, rrx4s
OFFICE OE rHd CtrY A"ORNL'y
U.3MORANDUM
la D. Morris, Assistant City Attorney
RObwt 8. Hunter, AaM4nt City Attorney
DATE: January 14, 1985
'ro: Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner
FROM: Joe D. tiorris, Acting City Attorney
SUBJECT: OPINION NO, 363; Requirements of Article 21 B, of
Appendix B-Zoning, providing that tite Planning and
Zoning Commission not approve plat of subdivisions
in the FTJ which are being considered for annexation
.without prior approval of the City Council.
In your undated letter received on January 8, 1985, a copy of
which is attached, you have asked our office to prepare a
resolution for City Council action pursuant to paragraph B of
Article 21 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances which
provides as follows:
B. The planning and zoning commission of the City of
Denton shall not approve any plat of any subdivision
within any area where a petition or ordinance for
annexation or a recommendation for annexation to the
City of Denton is pending before the city council,
unless and until such plat shall have been approved
by resolution of the city council.
Article 914s, Texas Revised Civil Statutes, confers upon the City
the authority to approve plats of subdivisions within 5 miles of
the corporate limits of the city, Section 3 of the statute sots
forth the procedure the city may follow in approving plats of
subdivisions, Section 3 reads, in part, as follows:
Sec, 3. It shall be unlawful for the County Clerk of
any county in which such land lies to receive or record
any such plan, plat or replat, unless and until the sane
shall have been approved by the City Planning Commission
of any city affected by this Ant, if said city has a
OPINION NO. 363
January 14, 1985
Page Two
City Planning Commission and if it has no City Planning
Commission unless and until the said plan plat, or
replat shall have been approved by the governing body of
such city. If a city has a City Panning Commission, the
governing body may, by ordinancs~ additionally require
approval of said plan, plat, or replat by the governing
body...Any person desiring to have a plan, plat or replat
Approved as herein provided, shall apply therefor to and
file a copy with the Commission, if there be one, or with
the governing body if there is no Commission. Tits Com-
mission, or governing body, as the case may be, shall
act upon so%;e within thirty (30) days from said filing
date. If said plat be not disapproved within thirty (30}
days from said filtaR date, it shall be deemed to have
been approved by the Commission, or the governing body
if there is no Commission. If a city with a Commission
has required that approval be given by the governing
bodyy then the governing body shall act upon the same
with~n thirty (30) days after the approval by the Com-
mission, or after the approval by reason of nonaction.
If said plat be not disapproved by the governing body
within said thirty (30) days, it shall be deemed to have
been approved by the governing body. (emphasis added)
The statut,~ry procedures of Article 974a, Section 3, clearly pro-
vides that the Planning Commission shall have the power to approve
plats of subdivisions, within thirty days of their filing, unless,
y ordinance, the city council requires that such plat also be
approved by the city council. If, the city council by ordinance,
is also required to approve such pleat, it shall act upon the plat
within thirty days after approval of the planning commission.
When a statute directs that action be taken in a certain way it may
be performed in no other manner. Smart v. Lloyd, 370 S.W42
d 245
(Civ.Appi-Texarkana 1963, no writ s c cy may not add a
procedural step that is not required by the comprehensive provisions
of the state law setting forth the procedure to be followed by the
city when exercising the power conferred upon it by the state
statute. San Pedro North LTD V, City of San Antonio, 562 S.W.2d
260 (C£v.AppI-San Antonio 1978 writ re n. r.. e.; cert. don. 99
S.Ct. 616; reh. den. 99 S.Ct. 1060); City of San Antonio v. Lanier,
542 S.W.2d 232 (Civ.App.-San Antonio 1 writ refod n.rse.
The Denton Development Code provides for the approval of final plats
by the Planning and Zoning Commission (Art. 2.03). Paragraph S of
Article 21 of the toning ordinance adds a procedural step to the
OPINION N0. 363
January 14, 1985
Page Three
subdivision apPproval process which is not provided for or required
by Article 974a and, therefore, is inconsistent with state law.
The City Council may provide by ordinance that it give final
approval of subdivision plats after the Planning and Zoning Com••
mission acts upon the plat. A city ordinance cannot reverse the
procedure provided by state statute and require approval of a
subdivision plat. by the City Council prior to final approval of
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Although we do not know what the original intent of paragraph B of
Article 21 of the zoning ordinan:e was, we can see no practical
reason at present :or such a provision. Since the approval
requirements for subdivision plats within the City and the extra-
territorial jurisdiction are the same, we see no reason for a
provision that requires the City Council to approve a subdivision
plat of land located in an area which is subject to annexation
proceedings to be approved by resolution of the Council prior to
final approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission. We would
suggest that paragraph B of Article 21 of our zoning ordinance be
repealed or amended to conform to the procedures required by state
statute.
SUMMARY
Paragraph B of Article 21 of Appendix B-'Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances, which requires approval of any subdivisiun located
within an area which is subject to
pending annexation proceedinggs
by resolution of the City Council prior to final plat approval by
the Planning and Zoning Commission, is inconsistent with the
subdivision plat approval procedures provided by state law. We
recommend that such provisions be repealed or amended to conform
to the procedures required by state law.
JDM: jc ,
P i Z Minutes
Pabruary 27, 1985
Pegs 6
Mr. Morris stated he would sujgast a specific site plan
be approved by this commission.
Mr. Sidor aceeptad the addition to the motion. Vote wes
c,illad and motion carried unanimously (7.0).
C. Recommend approval of final rsplat of the Owstay Park
Addition, Block ll, Lot 12A.
Mr. sPormau(s 0.36
east of Bonnie Brae. He stated athe tract to toned
residential multi-family (Mr-1) and mutts-faaily develop-
ment is anticipated. Thl purpose of the rspplatt is to
remove the existing lot ino go create one building
site. Devalopment Review Comittee racomends approval.
Mr. Rubio stated her is representing the developer end
the purpose is to a:!te one lot out of two.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Chair declatod the public hearing closed.
Mr. Worts made a motion CC0p recommend approval of the
Owslay Park AndiRlon, Lot 11 recommend block It. Seconded by
Mr. Esau* and unanimously carried (7.0).
D. Recommend approval of final rsplat of the Thompson
Addition, Phase i, Lot 1.
abutcia tOldtNorth 1.7 acrs
situatedavast of andthis
Road. north
of U.S. Highway 380. The site is toned fo multi-
family devolopp!pnent and residential multi-fau.!y develop-
ripi iataisntooabaadon ansexistingaiasese ppntuwhich is o0
required to service this davalopment. Development
Review Committee recommends approval.
No one spoke In favor or in oppoottLon to the request.
Chair declared the public haaring closed.
Linaltorsplateof the ThompsoncAddition, Phase of Lot 1.
Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unan„sourly carried (7.0).
E.' Recommend approval o: a proposnd ordinance that would
repeal paragraph S of Article ?.1 of Appendix g-Zoning of
the aCodo of pproval ObyLthecCityjCoCho unciltof platantn e of subdivisions
within an area where annsxatioa proceed'.age are pending;
and providing an effective date.
Mr. Parssud read paragraph g, Article 21, of the zoning
Cityno! Dint her PPannot and Zoning Commission of the
approve y plat of Any eubdlvi-
sion within any area where a petition or ordinance for
CityxCouncilo the City
andf untilosuch efore
approved by resolution of the City Council.
He aontinuad under pprovisions in Artlcls 914 (A) o!
Texas evias3 Civil 5tatua1, the Plaaning and 'loin`
iubdiviiian shal phe" t0a power to A days of the'ieptilial unlesso
P 2 Minutes
February 17, 1915
Pale 7
by ordinance the City Council rtquires that such plat
also be approved by the City Council. He stated the
Denton Development Code provides for the approval of
final plats by tha ?tannin' and Zoning Commission and
procedural o974 ts) vaad ptneiefore,
inconsistent with state law,
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Ellison stated yes,
what we have now is conflicting with state statutes.
Chair declared the public hearing closed,
Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recomeend approval of an
ordinance
d-ZoninjpofLthe CodelofpOrdinances Article the City of
Denton. Seconded by Mr. BfC1ie and Unanimously carried
L (7.0).
IY. Considerations
A. Recommend approval of the preliminsry Flat and general
development plan of McDonnell Highlands.
Mr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 39,5 acres
situated south of and
ceast of
Section aluoflthiscdevelopment Street,
urrent-
ly within the city limits and rho toning of the tract is
being considered along with plattlntt procedures. The
area currently outside the city limits is to be
considered for annexation and toning at a later stage.
Dove:,. ont Review Committee reccamends approval with
conditions.
Mr. Laporte side a notion to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat and general development plan of
McDonnell Highlands with the following conditions:
1) That a 16" diameter water ilne be extended from
Mayhlll Road along McKinney Street and across the
frontage of the property.
i) that a 12" diameter sanitary sewer line is to be
extended from Hickory Creek outfalL to the subject
property.
Seconded by Ms. Cole and motion carried unanimously
(7.0).
6. Appproval of preliminary and final plat of the
Plrst Assembly of God Addition.
dr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 1.144 acres
situated vast of and abutting Carroll Boulevard, north
of U.S. Highway 310. He stated this site Is covered by
a specific use permit S•lW for day care center develop-
ment and sanctuary development is anticippated. He
continued, Carroll Doulovard north of U. S. Highway 310
is to be codes It Rated as A primary major arterial road
feethof0eitth!•oliway tiaiiqultid~nbuenwidiiiluniblADto
request this rijt•of•way under our current regula.
tioRS. Development Review Committee recommends approval.
DATE: 10-1-85
CITY C0l~c~r~YP48~.ro~xAT ~ /
TO: Kayor and Members of the City Council L-f
PROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A - DENTON DEVELOPMENT
CODE OF ORDINANCES OP THE CITY OP DENTON, TEKAS TO PROVIDE FOR THE
IMPOSITION OF FEES FOR SUSRL"ING PgTTTIoms FOR VOLUNTARY
ANNBXATIONS, PROVIDING A SEVBRABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
RECORMNDATION:
The Planning and Zoning ComirsLon r*comends approval of a $250.00
fee for petitions: for property over five (5) Gores and no fee for
property lose thin five (5) acres.
Y=
The City Council held a public hearing and a majority voted in favor
of a fee at the September 17, 1985s meeting.
BACKGROUND:
Staff recommet,ded a fee after notioing a rise in voluntary petitions
for property with questionable development potential.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GRQUP9 AFFECTED:
Petitioners
LUCAL IHPACT:
The 8250.00 charge will cover only a small portion of the cost of
processing petitions for annexation.
Re pegl4 ly su ttt
Rick Svehla
Prepared ~ b~Q y% + Acting City Manager
~
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Appr ed
Jeff Hey
Direotod of Planning
and Development
13476
1084L
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A•DENTON DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES 6t THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TO PROVIDE FOR THE
IMPOSITION Ot FEE9 FOR SUSNiTTING PETtiIONS FOR VOLUNTARY ANN"-
ATIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, HERESY ORDAINSI
SECTION I.
That Article 3.03 (2) of Chapter III of Article It[ of Appendix
A, the Denton Development Code, of the Code of Ordinances is amended
by adding a new subsection (f) to read to follows:
Article 3.03. Annexation Policy
(f) Any persons firm or corporation who shall petition
the city for annexation shall pay to the Department
of Planning and Community Development a fail in an
amount determined, and as from time to ties amended, ordi bas d uponcthe administrative council.
of too shalt in
revlewtng such petitions. A copy of the ordinance
establishing the fees shall be maintained in the
Department of Planning and Community Development.
SECTION It.
se or phraTha i wordy in subsectiono paragraph, sentence, clause,
Y arson or circumstance is held invalid applicationthereof hofcompetent
urisdictton, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
City of Denton$ Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such
reaaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall becoea effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day cf
1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TE
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,~TEXAS
APPRO AS TO LEGs
DEBRAVADAMI DRAYOViTCH,RCITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:~
P b 2 Minutes
July 10, 1986
Page a
2, 1 ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A • DENTON DEVELOPMENT CODE OF
e o e on, exas p~'•
v1do tor CAI on of fees for submi•ting petttions
for voluntary annexational providing a severability clause=
and providing for an effective date,
• STAFF REPORT: Mr, Ellison advised that on April 10, loss
Ca8IiC331anendorsed the concept of imposing fees for, volun-
tary now presented for
$250.00 which
is one helf the minimum fee for toning changes, He ce,..-
tlnued that legal department has urged that established
explabe as ined thatostaff his pbeenbgetting &lot of petitions
for voluntary annexation and toning of large parcels, that
he feels many are speculative. I;e said there Is no great
detriment to the city to annex properties as Ion; as no
or# administrativegcostslin occupy withithe annexation
schedule.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present,
Public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr, Claiborne commented he has mixed emotions.
TKMKie feels $250.00 is reasonable for large parcels but
he has problems with the small property owner.
Mr. Juren commented that same costs would be involved In
large or small tracts, however, he 13 also concerned about
small developer. He moved to recommend a p ova! of ordi-
nance and accept staff's recommenJation of 250,00 for
voluntary annexation of five acres or more, with no fee
for less than five acres. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne.
Mr. Ellison asked Mr. Morris if that would create asry
le al problems and Mr. Morris said probably not but he
didn't know how breaking it down could be justified.
He said he would look at it further prior to the City
Council meeting,
Vote was tilled and motion carried unanimously (4.0).
IV. CONSIDERATIONS$
A. PRELIMINARY PLAT OP THE DAVIS E UITY REALTY ADDITION,
LOF A, b9ccK is
STAPP REPORT: Mr. Ellison explained that tract is 1.4
TETIL-rarmd at the northeast corner of Highway 310 and
Gay Drive, property is toned eneral retail and retail
development is anticipated. development Review Committee
recommends &P royal with condition that sanitary sewer
useage be halted to six toilets temporarily, on question,
he said engineer representing developer saes no objection
to condition,
c
October 1, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Study Session
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
PROM: Rick Svehli, Acting City Manager
SUBJELI:
J PROPOSbb UTILITY BOARD SELF EVALUATION STUDY ON THE
t.1 UTILITY: SYSTEM
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their Set'tember 18, 19859
meeting, re- mmended approval of subject management
evaluation study.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND
Attached is the recommended management evaluation contract
betweon the City of Denton and Dr. C. L. Littlefield. Dr.
Littlefield will be responsible for assisting the Public
Utilities Board and Staff in an evaluation of the Utility
Dept, L-nnt and General Government support services to tine
Utilit, This evaluation should hel► to itl,rove the
:anage n! of the Utility and City ant will provide the
i undatko►, information that will be necessary for the
Ci..►rter required management study which is planned to be
conduct,d in ,W or 1988.
Dr. Littlefield will coordinate the efforts of any
a-tditional sNcialists that may be required in this
fort. He will also compile the information and prepare a
f;nal report. The City will provide typing and report
printing and report assembly services. The, contract with
Dr. Littlefield is for $18,000 professional Services and
$2,000 expenses. Cumpletion of the project is nine (9)
months.
It is anticipated 'hat 501 of ti►e study will cover internal
reviews of the Utility Department such as organitational
structure, planning -ontrols, communications, reporting,
safery, equipment ,till?.ition, op rational practices,
effic.tences, public relations, Council/board/staff liaison
and relations, etc.
The remainin, 501 of the study w 11 cov(,r support services
that are pruvided by Genera; Governmei* u:h ns finance,
accounting, cost accounting, custc»ec tvice, personnel,
data processing, energy "t nn Tvt,t engineering,
lns,"pctions, right-of-way ac u► it nn, Iurchasing,
warehousing, vehicle maintensnce, etc.
~c305U:6
PROGRA!%4S, DEPARTMENTS OR GitOiJPS AFFECTED:
All City of 11entun Departments, citizens.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Dr. Littlefield 200000
4 specialists B $3,000 each 120000
Misc. Secretarial Support 20000
Staff Time not determinable
Estimated Total $34,000
Source of funds:
Electric/Water/Sewer Adm. Services Budget
1985 Budget 25,000
1986 budget 25,000
Any additional funds required would be transferred from
amounts budgeted :or Power Supply Study, Transmission
Engineering Studies, or Innovative Energy Management
Program.
R pest u11y ub i ted
C Ve a
Acting City Manager
. ;T
R. elson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I 'roposed Contract
if 8/21/85- PUB Agenda Item on Mgmt Study
III Logal Opinion
IV Minutes of PUB Meetings "Actions to bate"
V ordinance
390$u;7
• Y .+5:
1196L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THS CITY OF DENTON AND
C. L, LITTLEFIELD FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTINU SERVICES REGARDING A
MANAGEMENT EVALUATION STUDY FOR THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT OV THE CITY
OF Dr1TON# TEV.ASr AUTHORISING THE MAYOR TO BXECUTS THE CONTRACT)
APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORER AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the City of Ds!.Ron desires to undertake a Utility
Management Evaluation Study for the Utility department of the city
of Denton, Texas) and
WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain profesiional consulting
services in connection with such study) and
WHEREAS, C, L, Littlefield I$ qualified and cappable of
performing the services desired by the City, is acceptable to the
City, and is willing to enter into an Agreesent with the City to
perform such servlcesR NOW, THEREFORS,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS)
SECTION I.
That the contract between the City of Denton, Texas and r, L,
Littlefield, attached hereto and made a part hereof, for I':ofes-
sional consulting services in connection with the preparr.tion of a
Management Evaluation Study for the Utlil;y Department of the City
of Denton is hereby approved and the Mayur is hereby authorised to
execute the contract on behalf of the City,
QECTION I1,
Tnat the expenditure of funds in the amount of Eighteen
Tnocaand Dollars ($lS,000.00) for compensation t,r,d a sum not to
exceed Two Thousand Dollars (12,000,00) for actual expenses is
hereby approved.
SECTION III.
f That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval,
PALSE1 AND APPROVED this day of
19854
RICHARD 0, S'PE ART, M►.YC;R
CITY OF DENTON, TFXA6
ATTESTt
CHMMTH i Y dE(.RET RQ
CITY OF DCNTON, TEXA6
APPROVED AS TO LEOAli FORMt
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CIYY ATTORNEY
CITY OF OENTONt TEXAS
by $
! a ! `'7 t . i g p A
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Debra Adtni Drayovitch, City Attorney
Jot D, Norris, Assistant City Attorney
Robert S. Xunter, Assistant City Attorney
TO: R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities
FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Management Survey of Utilities
DATE: Juno 3, 1985
In accordance with your re queat of May 21, 1985, I have reviewed
Article 12, Section 12.08{f) of the Home Rule Charter of the City
of Denton with respect to the requirement of a management study.
The requirement of the Charter is quito cle+irly stated: a general
management survey (is) to be made of all utilities under the
jurisdiction of the board by a competent management consulting or
industrial engineering firm. Because of this language, I do not
feel that the Public Utilities Board can direct the study and meet
the requirements of the Charter provision. I do believe that the
staff and the members of the Public Utilities Board can legally
take an active role in participating in the study. It may also be
possible to utilize different expert consultants for different
areas of the management study but it should be noted that it is
questionable as to whether this will satisfy the requirements of
the Charter.
Should you have any questions relative to this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
6 A. DRAYOVI
DAD : ja
xc: G. Chris Hartung
Mayor & members of the City Council
I
I THE STATE OF TEXAS y
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
DENTON AND C. L. LITTLEFIELD
COUNTY OF DENTON $
The City of Denton, Texas, a home rule municipal corporation,
hereafter called "CITY", acting herein by and through its Acting
City Manager and C. L. Littlefield, hereafter called "CONSULTANT",
hereby mutually agree as follows:
1.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CITY agrees to employ consultant for the purpose of
coordinating a management study of City's Utility System and its
aupport service groups which ahall be conducted in the following
manner:
1. CONSULTANT shall work with the Public Utilities Board
and the City's administrative staff in planning the scope of the
management evaluation.
2. CONSULTANT shall conduct and be responsible for the
implementation of the evaluation by performing the following
services:
(a) Aid the Public Utilities Board in the selection of
specialized management consultants to undertake
specialized aspects of the evaluation.
(b) Consult with staff regarding administrative
processes as carried out including organization,
planning, policy formulation ana use, performance,
measurement and control, employee relations, finan-
cial administration, interdepartmental relations,
staff, Board and Council relations and community
relations.
(c) Determine, with stefe and Board, areas tha'_ offer
potential for improvement and prioritize these
areas in terms of time and attention.
(d) Devise study approaches that utilize both inside
talent (Board, staff, other departmental
personnel, Coordinator) and outside specialists,
and implement those that are possiole for the
current fiscal year.
3. CONSULTANT shall compile a draft comprehensive report of
all separate management studies by June 15, 1986, with final
report due July 15, 1986.
II.
PAYMENT
CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for the services performed here-
under as follows:
(a) The sum of Eighteen Thousand Dollars ($18,000.00) pay-
able in monthly installments of Three Thousand Dollars
($3,000.00) per month, commencing November, 1985.
(b) A sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)
for out-of-pocket expenses which shall be submitted
monthly. Such out-of-pocket expanses include, but
are not limited to, travel, long distance telephone
charges and printing expenses. Said expenses shall
be submitted on a month.1y basis.
(c) Payments shall be made for services in subsection (a)
no later than the 5th day of the montn following and
shall be paid no later than 15 days after submission
of expenses provided for in subsection (b).
III.
TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence upon October 15,
1985. CONSULTANT shall complete his services provided hereunder
within nine months from the date of execution of this Agreement.
PAGE 2
, ire
da.4
IV.
TERMINATION
CITY may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice
to CONSULTANT. In the event of termination, CITY shall pay
CONSULTANT for full services rendered and expenses incurred to
date of termination and CITY snail receive all completed work to
the date of termination and any work in progress snail also be
delivered to CITY.
V.
MODIFICATIONS
The provisions of this Agreement constitute the entire Agree-
ment between the parties and supercede all prior communications
and agreements, oral or written, between the parties nereto with
regard to the subject of this contract.
VI,
SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY
It is mutually understood and agreed by and between CITY and
CONSULTANT that CONSULTANT is an independent CONSULTANT and snail
not be deemed to oe or considered an employee of the CITY of
Denton, Texas for the purposes of income tax, withholding, social
security taxekz, vacation or sick leave benefits, worker's compen-
sation, or any other CITY employee benefit. The CITY shall not
nave suporvision and control of CONSULTANT and any employee of
CONSULTANT., and it is expressly understood that CONSULTANT shall
perform the serviees hereunder at the direction of and to the
PAGE 3
10
y°x
Fly
satisfaction of the City manager of the City of Denton or his
designee under this Agreement.
VI1.
OTHER CONSULTANTS
It is hereby understood that CITY shall Enter into agreements
with other individuals, firms or corporations to assist in the l
performance of the services provided for herein. Such
individuals, firms or corporations shall perform services under
the direction of CONSULTANT and said services shall be coordinated
with CONSULTANT. i
VIII:
SOURCE OF FUNDS
1
All payments to CONSULTANT under this Agreement are to to paid
I
by the CITY from funds appropriated by the City Council for such 1
purposes in the Budget of the City of Denton.
IX.
CONFIDENTIAL WORK
No reports, information, project evaluation, or any other
documentation developed by, given to, prepared by or assembled by
CONSULTANT under this Agreement that contains confidential infor-
mation belonging to CITY shall be disclosed oc made available to
any individurl or organization by CONSULTANT without the express
prior written approval of the CITY. {
i
I
r
PAGE 4 j
%NNW
. ~ y
X.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Upon acceptance or approval by CITY, all reports, data and
other documents given to, prepared ot, assembled under this Agree-
ment by CONSULTANT, and any otrier related documents or items shall
become the sole property of CITY and shall be delivered to CITY.
XI.
INDEMNITY
To the extent allowed ny the law of the State of Texas, CON-
SULTANT shall defend, inaemnify, and hold CITY whole and harmless
against any and all claims for damages, costs, and expenses to
persons or property that may arise out of, or be occasioned by or
from any negligent act, error or omission of CONSULTANT or any
agent, servant, or employee of CONSULTANT in the execution or
performance of this Agreement.
MI.
RIGHT OF REVIEW
CITY may review any and all of the services performed by
CONSULTANT under this Agreement.
XIII.
IN:URANCE
CONSULTANT shall provide, at his own cost and expense,
worker's compensation insurance, liability insurance, and all
other insurance necessary to protect CONSULTANT in the operation
of CONSULTANT's business.
PAGE 5
XIV.
SERVICES SUf'PLIES TO BE FURNISHED BY CITY
City agrees to furnish to Contractor the following services:
(a) Typing support through the Word Processing Department
and minimal staff assistance to assemble the final
document required herein.
XV.
ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement shall not be assignable in whole or in part
wit:iout me written consent of the other party.
XVI.
VENUE
Venue and jurisdiction of any suit, rignt or cause of action
arising under or in connection with tnis Agreement shall be
exclusively in Denton County, Texas.
XVII.
NOTICE
Any notice given by one party to the other in connection with
this Agreement shall be in writing and snall oe sent by registered
mail, return receipt requested, with postage and registration fees
prep,.id:
CITY CONSULTANT
Rick Svehla C. L. Littlefield
Acting City Manager 2703 Brookfield
215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201
Denton, Texas 76201
PAGE 6
Notices snail be deemed to have been received on the date of
receipt as shown on the retarn receipt.
Executed this the day of _ , 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
RICK SVEHLA, ACTING CITY
MANAGER
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DE3RA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: tit.
CONSULTANT
BY:
C. L. LITTLEFIEID
That is hereby designated as tte
person to administer the provisions of this agreement.
DATE RICK SVEHLA, ACTING CITY
MANAGER
PAGE 7
August 21, 1985
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AGENDA ITEM EXHIBIT It
TO: CHA W AN AND M BIBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
FROM: R.E. Nelson, Director of Utilities
SUBJECT:
DISCUSS AND CONSIDER MANAGEMENT STUDY.
RECOMMENDATION
SOMA ARY/BACKGROUND
The Public Utilities Board has discussed several approaches
to conducting a Management Study and have generally
indicated an interest Ise employing a Management Professor
to coordinate the Study. Attached is a sample contract for
such services. Also included herewith is a general scope
of work and minv-r s of previous Public Utilities Board
discussions on the Aanagement Study.
PROGRAMS, DEPARV ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Denton Municipal Utilities, citizens, City of Denton.
FISCAL IA PACT
Not determinable at this time.
Prep:.red by: Respectfully submitted,
Robert Nelson R.E. Nelson, P.E.
Directur of Utilities Director of Utilities
Approved:
1
R.E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
Exhibit I Paper b•.* john Thompson, June 27, 198S
11 Questionnair: by Joan Thompson prepared April 29, 1985
III Minutes PCB Atetings
IV Contract for Management Study
Attachment I Scope of Services, Pnase I through VIII
38S9U
. r r.
y r ~ r'
a
SUGGESTED A ETHODS FOR CONDUCTING A J ANAG V ENT SELF-EVALUATION
In light-of the City Attorney's opinion at our last meeting and the
fact that the formal management audit has been postponed, I suggest
that we `undertake a comprehensive management self-evaluation study
to ensure that we ars following the best possible management
practice itheh De ton utilities. Such an evaluation should help us
adequacy, efficiency, and effectiveness of utility
management and operations, and should help identify areas where we
could improve. It should also assist us in preparing to contract
for a management audtt in the future.
Steps to Pare for Stud
I suggest that we employ a management expert from one of our
universities to assist us with the study and to act as overall
coordinator of the study. This consultant should assist us in
designing the study. Then he should consult with tha man%genent
staff and then prepare self-evaluation questionnaires on various
aspects of the utilities management. The staff would be involved in
answering the evaluations which would serve as the b,-sis fcr
board/staff study sessions. At these meetings we would first look
at what we are presently doing; hear from the consultant his view
of what, the best management practices call for, and finally we would
discuss alternative actions which may be called for.
I believe that we might reasonably hold one such study session every
six weeks over the next nine months or a total of six stildy
sessions. ',e will need to talk with the management consultant about
areas or topics to be considered, but I suggest that we begin wtih a
session considering the recommendations of earlier management
audits. What was proposed? What' have we done to meet the
recommendations? Do we need to do anything further?
The remaining five sessions might follow the topics listed in nv
questions submitted to the Board on April 19, 1985. For instance.
we could first consider how well we manage ideas, planning and
guidance of the utility. The question I raised in thus memo might
hf:lp us in planning such a program.
A third program would consider how well we manage t7ings--
operations of physical plant and equipment. Again the question on
my earlier memo might help in planning such a program.
The fourth program would consider managing people, that is the
behavioral aspects of management. Here we might survey
employer-aanagement attitudes; consider pay scales in other
utilities; at well as looking at the management styles used in
motivating and communicating with employees.
Y is
Page t
A fifth program would look at managing in the
political-inter-organizations environment.. we could look at the
city-utility relationships; the utilitTMPA relationships; The
utility-citizens-relationship.
The sixth and final program could compare Denton's utility with
other comparable utilities.
Summary
As I see the self evaluation study, there would be self eva!uation
questionnaires prepared by and evaluated by a management expert.
:anagement staff would be directly involved in evaluating what we
are presently doing. At joint staff/board study sessions, we would
compare what we are doing against the State of the art management
practices. There would be a total of six such study meetings over a
nine month period. The meetings would be as follows:
1. Consideration of the affect of earlier management
audit recommendations.
2. Managing ideas, planning, and guidance of the utility.
3. Managing things-operations of physical
equipment, plant and
4. Aanaginf; people-behavioral aspects of management,
5. Managing in the political inter organizational
environment.
6. Comparisons of Denton's utilities with other
comparable utilities.
A copy of the suggested questions for management audit, April 29,
1985 is attache,.
John Thompson
Public Utilities Board Member
June 27, 1985
37'S~U;i•2
w n
0 777
t $ n 1 t 'f d 3' ? y' . _T 7
SUGGESTED QUESTIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AUDIT
(submitted by John Thompson, Public Utilities Board Member)
April 29, 198S
1. MANAGING IDEAS, PLANNING $ GUIDANCE OF UTILITY
A. Is the Utility organized in suet, a way as to effectively
perform its tasks?
1. Could it be improved?
2. Are woitc teams well organized?
3. Are supervisors performing effectively?
S. Regarding the Management Information System, does the
Utility Management Team have adequate data for decision
making?
1. For foreforecasting and evaluating outcomes from the
the administrative process?
2. Could it be improved? Now?
3. Does the system provide best/worst scenarios, how to
respond to a drop in revenues and/or increase in
operating expenses (use in gas or oil pricing)
C. Does needed information flow effectively in the utility's
communication network?
1. How could communications be improved?
2. Does the communication system work downward or upward?
3. Is there a Eeedback process?
L. Is the managerial planning system adequate?
1. Are work assignments well-planned and conceived and
fully implemented?
2. How are the tasks and objectives, once completed
evaluated?
3. Once evaluated, how are, rerommtndations (changes)
Implemented?
3b24U
V'P ~ V11 ql~
1' "f lal
I l I.
E. Are evaluation studies conducted to insure that all
programs are as effective as possible?
1. How can the evaluation program be improved?
2. In employee evaluation (performance evaluations) -are
they fair to everyone or are they generalized?
3. Are there any training programs to assist those
employees that had low performance evaluations or
reward those with high performance evaluations rather
than dollars alone?
F. Do we have written procedures, rules and regulations for
administrating various policies?
1
11. MANAGING THINGS-OPERATION OF PHYSICAL PLANT AND EQUIVMENT
A. Is the financial management system organized and operated
as eftectively and efficiently as possible?
1. Do revenues from income and bonds compare favorably
with comparable utilities?
2. How does ou: operating budget process compare with
most successful utilities?
a, Does it need to be modified?
3. flow does our CIP budget process compare with most
successful utilities?
a. Does it need to be modified?
4. Evaluate the Utilities' treasury functions, and the
various financial reports which are made.
a, floe :an this aspect be improved?
b. Are idle funds properly invested?
c. Are the investments safe? (i.e., city of Beaumont)
36240:2
41
r
S. Does the City need a capital recovery, fee for
financial support to pay for new capital costs in
Water/Wastewater Plants and oversize lines?
a. What are other cities doing?
B. Evaluate the materials management program.
1. Does the utility's purchasing program insure that we
receive the best product for the least cost?
a. How can this be Improved?
2. Does the inspection and testing program used by the
Utility adequately insure that materials and equipment
purchasel are of the quality called for?
I
3. Does the program for storage of materials and
equipment safe and efficiently managed?
a. Are inventory controls adequate?
4. Is there proper control over the utilization of
materials a.td equipment?
S. Goes the utility have an aduequate risk management
program that covers all possibilities of loss at the
best cost possible?
a, Are collections from insurance companies for
losses promptly made?
b. How are current insurance coverage and practices
evaluated and updated?
111. MANAGING FEUi'LE-BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF MANAGE4ENT
A. Evaluate the leadership styles of management staff and the
organizational climate for creativity,
1. Is there an openness for communications?
2. Now can we improve in this area?
B. Are employees and staff highly motivated in their work?
1, What additional steps need to be made to riot Ivate
emplo~,ees?
2. Evaluate }personnel system.
3bZ4U:3
}Y M':r t : hr arC i ;.G i .n
1V. MANAGING POLITICS-POLITICAL RELATIONS OF CITY WITH CITY AND
CITIZENRY
A. How does Utility's cantribution to General Government
compare with that of other municipal utilities?
B. Evaluate Utility's public relations environment and
programs.
V. COMPARE DENTON' S UTILITY WITH O&HER COMPARABLE UTILITIES.
i
i
36141,:4
June 19, 1985
EXHIBIT,
CHAIRMAN AND M EWBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD III.
FROM: R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities
SUBJECT:
Receive City Attorney legal Opinion Regarding Conducting of
Management Study by Public Utility Board with In-House Assistance.
RECOMMENDATION:
None at thi!, time.
SUMriARY: I
At the May 15, 19859 Public Utilities Board meeting, the Board
discussed a possible alternative method to conduct a management
study, rather than hiring a management consulting firm. Th,i3
alternative included acquiring the services of several different
parties who would be authorities in selected areas of management and
work closely with the Board and staff to provide a management review
and recommendations. Some question developed regarding whether such
alternative approach would meet the charter provision for the
management study. Attached herewith is the City Attorney's opinion
regarding this question.
Also included with this agenda packet is the 1965 Management Study,
the 1978 Management Study of the Electric Divisions and the 1980
Management Study of the Water/Wastewater system.
BACKGROUND:
Not applicable.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Department of Utilities, Public Utilities Board, engineering firms.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
Pre red by Res Lectfully, Submitted,
R. ~~CfeT'1'sb~ r I
Director of Utilities Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I City kttorney Legal Opinion
II Previo- Management Studies
3 33U:41
A Vi
REVIEW OF PROPOSED c4 ANAGt.JFNT "!;fuDY EXHIBIT IV
BY PUBLIC UTILITIES ra!.kRD
Actions to Date
February 6, 198S
0. 'CONSIDER UTILITY MANAGEMENT STUDY
The Board had requested this stns be placed on thi agenda
to discuss utilities organisation issues. The Board hae
also requested a list of management consultants who
regularly engage in organization management studies.
EXHIBIT 1
item is a list of such firms attached to the agenda
.
Mr. Nelson spoke to the Board regarding the Maus and
suggested that the list of consultants by no means is to be'
considered comprehensive b
~ but does include cospaniils which
staf. was somewhat familiar with and could recommend,
The Board discussed various considerations that they would
de~ ire, The Board would like to request a brochure from
each of a selected group of consultants to inform them of
the type of services available. The group selected by the
Board with the ability to deal with utilities and to cover
several geographical areasi Tovehe Ross of Dallas, Ernst
and Whinney of F.jrt Worth, Gilbert Comeonweath of
Pennsylvania, Barry and Associates of California. The
Board requested that staff write each of the firms and
request the list of services, a brochure, and list of
clients for wnnr they have done a study recently. The
staff will than do a follow up and contact the list of
clients to s4* what services were provided, the scope of
the study, ana their satisfaction.
No other action was taken. The Board anticipates reviewing
this topic as soon as the information becomes available.
i
March 17, 198S
9. CONSIDER ENGINEERS' aK,CIiURES AND INrORMATION FOR DEVELOPMENT
Ur F4ANXrjF.%iEN i THE DEPAR7rf$N T O F-TrrLTfiTE a n ey
requested written reports from the various companies. Nelson
recommended that two management consulting firms'
representatives make formal presentations at the April
meeting. Herring confirmed the suggestion and further
recommended Theodore Barry Associates and Touche Ross. In
addition, Herring suggested that a sub committee make out a
list of questions for the companies, Laney suggested that
these representatives be present at our next regular meeting,
April 240 198S. Volunteers for the sub-committee are Laney,
Coomes, and herring.
38170:l
4
n
April 10, 1985
This item was not presented to the Board at the April meeting.
M,Sw 1985
4. CONSIDER AANAGMENT STUDY
Thompson indicated tnat he was not imrressed with either Touche
Ross or Theodore Barry Associates to conduct the management
study. What we want, according to Thompson, is a management
audit that will (1) force us to evaluate our operation in light
of the best management standards possible, and (1) give us a
comprehensive study of our organization. He suggested the
Board itself conduct the audit. He outlined the proposed audit
to include the following guidelines:
11 Create a management study that will include the City
Council, Utility Board, City and Utility Management,
and Operating Personnel and compare us to other
similar utilities.
2. Involve all parties or their representatives who will
be included in the study.
3. Recruit management experts, (approximately six) to
outline issues and questions from their respective
areas of study for the group to ask of itself, the
organization, and utility data base.
4. Have all sectors of Utility Administration answer the
questions outlined from the experts.
5. Have each expert analyze the answers in his area of
ex,oertisc, and review their findings with the group.
6. Have one expert or team of experts (ie. Manager of a
major utility) to analyze the
conclusions/recommendations of the six experts, and
conduct a final seminar. The study would be conducted
over a per'Aod of about six months; each expert would
be involved for approximately one month in his
respective area of expertise.
Herring praised Thoapson's innovative approach to the
management study, but expressed the concern that the
study may not satisfy the charter requirements.
Hartung suggested we get an opinion from Legal
regarding this issue.
3827U:2
i'
Coomes expressed the' concern that the study must have
public
and City Council credlbilitY Laney agreed.
Thompson indicated that
we could
recruit experts in each
area which would give credibility to the study. Laney also
reminded the Board that the City Charter was developed in a
similiar manner and is considered to be a credible and
outstanding document.
Herring suggested that we obtain a Legal ruling on the
proposed plan and proceed from that decision. Laney
suggested Thompson outline the proposed program. In the
meantime, Herring asked that the proposed program be ready
and viewed prior to the next meeting.
Thompson agreed
do so. to
Herring feels we will need a full time person to work for
six months on this project. Boyd suggested we include
Utility personnel and Input from the Board.
Herring made a motion to postpone action on item 04 until
the next scheduled meeting, June 19th at 7:30 p.m. Boyd
seconded the motion. All ales, no nayes, motion cirried.
June 19, 1985
RECEIVE CITY ATTORNEY LEGAL OPJNION REGARDING CONDUCTING F
PUBLIC-CMITY BOARD
ASSISTANCE.
Drayovitch rendered a legal decision regarding this item.
She indicated that a management study must be conducted by
an engineering/consultant firm-every ten (10) years. There
could be a consultant for each utility if desired.
Laney suggested the Board do a study to regulate policy
development. Thompson recommended the Board consider a
project of self evaluation in order to diroet the ten (10)
year audit.
Boyd agreed, however, indicated that the Staff is concerned
about the amount of time needed for such a self-evaluation
neededt.would Laney be primarily tsecthe retarilal in in-house nature.
indicated there would also be meetings, and followup by the
Staff.
Herring suggested 'Thompson develop his plan prior to the
next meeting. Boyd volunteered to provide secretarial
assistance.
3827U:3
July 3, 198S
3. DISCUSS AND CONSIDER mMwEAlENT ST.'UDI BY PUBLIC
Coomes requested the Board to delay this item until
the arrival of Laney, The Board agreed.
Thompson requested s+.ggestions from the Board and
staff prior t:o proceeding to the next agenda item.
Coomes suggested the following question to be placed
in number five (S) under two (2) A: "Does the City
need some kind of capital recovery in order for
financial management to be solid? What are other
cities doing in this matter?"
Nelson indicated that Keith Reed of Touche Ross
offered to be the coordinating entity for this
project. Touche Ross would employ the people
necessary to assist the Board in whatever ;api,city.
Thompson agreed that the Board would neod someone In
this capacity.
Coomes posed a question regarding the ex Nnse of
conducting
two studies, ,oe for the Board and one to meet the
City Charter requirement,
Nelson Indicated that the self-evaluating study
incorporating the professional coordinating body could
possibly fulfill the Charter requirement; however, a
legal opinion would be needed.
Nelson cited several advantages to utilizing a
coordinating
body. The amount of staff time that will be involved
for this project would be considerable without the
coordinating
body to assist. In addition, the Board could limit
the cost of the project as well as eliminate the fees
involved in contracting individual coordinators. The
latter would also prolong the self-evaluation process.
Boyd indicated a desire to look at Denton as a
regional body in the study. Thompson indicated that
It can be considered.
3827U:4
1Y`, a
Thompson suggested the following que`tion for, I as Ft
"Do wo have written formulated rules and regulations?
Are they adequate and falr7"
Thompson
suggestions begin t the pBoa•d tfor
the next meeting.
J jul 17, 1985
8. DISCUSS AND CONSIDER MAJAGEMENT STUDY.
Laney expressed concern regyrding the article in the Denton
Record Chronicle which indicated that the pproposed
self-evaluating study could meet the charter re.-~uirements
if coordinated b a consultant firm. Laney preters that
the self-evaluation study preceed the formal management
audit.
Nelson encouraged the Board to move forward on the
management study soon or soon as possible. The utility
staff would recommend a full management audit, rather than
a self-evaluation study.
Coomes thinks that there is a tremendous advantage to
conducting a self-evaluation study coordinated by a
consultant that would meet the charter requirements. He
indicated that the City would save money and the new City
Manager would have a document to draw upon if changes were
needed.
The Board asked Join Thompson to check with and invite a
management professor to a special called Board meeting in
two week to discuss the proposed management study.
17 1 -,v
t z'"
MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
July 319 1985 7:00 a.ms
Ramada inn
MEdBERS PRESENT: Roland Laney, Edward Coomas, Nancy Boyd, John
Thompson, R. E. Nelson, Chris Hartung
STAFF PRESENT: Ernie Tullos, David Has, Charles Cryan
OTHERS PRESENT: Steve Beeler, Denton Record Chronicle
ABSENT: None
meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Roland Laney at ;:OS
a.m.
1CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
Coomes made s motion to approve the minutes as
amended. Thompson seconded the motion. Motion
carried,
1. DISCUSS AND CONSIDER MANAGEMENT STUDY.
1
Thompson informed tho Board that Dr. Littlefield, a
Management Professor at North Texas State University,
could not be present at the morning meeting due to
recent surgery. Dr. Littlefield will be available for
the regular August Board meeting to discuss the
proposed Management Study.
The Board members discussed the role of the "Study
Coordinator" for the proposed Management Study.
Thompson recommended two primary duties:
1. Provide expert support for each phase of the
study,
a. Advise on available talent in a specific
topic area.
b. Negotiate with proposed study leaders as
to timinJ of specific topic work sessions
and "on site" work scheduling.
Co Coordinate any document information siich
as questionnaires, measurement
instruments, etc.
q`7ri~; ;S?.'6 ^~;Ta"T^`r'r~'"y ~sa.
t
in
2. Organize and compile study achievements$
a, Review previous Utility Management Study
documents with particular emphasis on
recommended actions.
b. Review mr,nagement documents and studies
of other utilities co develop additional
measurement data.
c. Coi )ile a comprehensive report from study
areas including recommended actions or
changes,
After some additional discussion] the Board took no
action on the item. The Board in4icated that the
staff should begin developing a contract with cost and
spa cific study elements open for Board recommendation.
3. DISCUSS MASTER SEWER PLAN FO_R_ HICKORY CREEK AREA.
Nelson again informed the Board of the problem of
enforcing currer.t policies with regard to wastewater
ntrol within the drainage area north and west of the
discussion waskeprotectionovof i theg Dento;swaternsupply
at its nta:e point west of 13SE at Lewisville Lake.
Coomes made a motion directing staff to work with the
cities within the drainage basin to develop a Regional
wastewater plan within the area within a set of
guidelines:
1) That the City of Denton and its ratepayers not
bare a disproportionate share of costs;
z) That Denton protect its primary water supply;
3) That planning focus on service to Municipal
Corporations or Public Utility districts; and
. 4) That all legal concerns be included within
contractractual obligations.
Boyd seconded the motion, Motion carried.
r
OSAL '
w'
I E 5 0 L U T 1 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED BY ME CITY COUNCIL OF flip' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
The City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, heresy
nominates Raymond Pitts to be a member of the Board of Directors
of the ' County Bide AEpraisal District for the County of Denton,
'y
Texas.
SECTION it.
This Resolution shall haco-le effective from and after its
date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of 1985.
CITY OF Dd.VTONI T[~(AAS~~
ATTEST:
ALLEN CITY BE
4
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED M 'TO LEGAL FOAH:
DEBRA ADMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTOMEY
C111 OF MAN, TEXAS
HY:~
kr
i
~$'p,~}! i5~~y~Ffl nrw, L"°i M:yee~~tip~j, i.. r rrl - w .r
MARY
'Jt'+
u DEMNO r
' -
7
ff ~ ,
t "
8Ep
TO: All Taxing Units Addressed BEPTDZER 19, 1985
FROM: Mary Jo H111--County Clerk
RE: Voting Entitlement and Nominees for Denton County
Appraisal District 1986-1987
Based upon the information furnished meo your voting entitlement for Board of
Directors for 1986.1987 Denton County Single App sisal Tax District is'listed
on the attached sheet, with the 1984 Tax levy submitted to me by the Denton
County Appraisel District.
Each voting taxing unit may nominate one candidate for each position to be
filled on the Board of Directors. There will be five (5) positions filled on
The Board of Directors. THESE NOMIKATIONS MUST BE MADE BY RESOLUTION. Once
V- 9
each voting taxing unit has comp e e
e nom na ons, a Ares ngg officer
of each voting unit' s governing body submits the NAMES and DDRESSES of the
nominees to me. These nominations must be submitle To me MUKE OCTOBER 16s
1985s Nominations received AFTER OCTOBER 15 1985 will note ne u e on e
)a of which must be prepare y me an su to to the presiding officer of
the governing body of each voting unit BEFOR,OCT08ER 30. 1985.
Each voting taxing unit must determine its vote by RESOLUTION and submit it to
me BEFORE NOVEMBER 15 1985. Votes cast AFTER NOVEMBER 15. 1985 will be dis-
reg'ar e
8EF2E DECEMEER 1 19850 I must count the votes and declare the five candidates
w o rece ve t re arges cumulative vote totals elected. By this date also. I
must notify the governing bodies or all taxing units in the appraisal districts
and the candidates, of tha resultse
I respe;:tfully request your assistance inmeeting these deadlines. It you have
any questions, or if I may help in any way, please call me. Thank you for your
cooperation in helping to meet, our deadlines.
Sinca;,ely,
i
I
+ P Oy BO il y er ,
4eoton, Texas 76202
i♦~4 ~,v Iy pi'_Sn l7 tir Ys t c+ .•1^, ^ r,fl F.+.
DENTON COUNTY APPPAISAL DISTRICT
BOAR OFDIRECTRS VOTING CALCULATION PROCESS
SCHOOL DISTRICTS 191 TAX LI?VY ENTIVO ftEN1
ArRyle Aubrey 521,i)38.00 42
Denton 3450555.00 28
I 4 11,5520141.00 943
Krum 420,531.00 35
Lake Dallas 1,166,052.Of1 95
Lewisville 16 125 195.00 1316
NoLittlerthwest st ~105,330.0A 57
3,959,981.00 323
Ponder Point A43,414.00 69
r 224,8AR.00 19
Sanger 914,297.00 74
COUNTY
Denton County 9,376051.00 765
SPECIAL DISTRICTS*
Clearcreek W.A. 149849.00
Colony MUD 1 , 368, 58'1.00
Corinth MUD 27,000.00
Denton Countyy F.P. 20016840
Lake Cities MUA 151,19240
Trophy Club MUD 576,483.00
* SPECIAL DISTRICTS ARE NON-VOTING
CITIES
Aubrey 33,964.00 3
'the Colony 1,3050240.00 106
Corinth 190,678.00 15
Denton 608080814.00 556
Eastvale 32068.00 3
Plower Mound 921 , 352. Aft 75
Highland Village` 54007A2.00 44
Justin 37,840.0(1 3
KrugerviII v 14,740.00 1
Krum 19,6;,5.00 2
Lake Dallas '211901-90000 18 1
Lewisville 4,?#3,,733.00 362 /
Little Elm ,.84,615900 7
Marchall Creek 6s685 00 1
Oak Point 38,286.60 '3
Pilot Point 13700.00 12
Ponder 4 605.b0
Roctoke 42,284.00 4
Sanger 217 924. AO 18
N o 6'8. 0 --M-
rVv F i'. ¢ '1N4, 'p'ry f°,~ SC y- T ~ • }P 4 r, ~ p ,i
141
1~1SL~ r.
80
k E 5 0 L U T 1 O N
WHEREAS, on July 25, 1978 the City of Denton entered into a
contract with the State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation to procure right-of-way for the extension of
Highway Loop No. 288 fro.s the present north terminus of U. S,
Highway 380, north and west to Interstate Highway 's5; c..d
WHEREAS, pursuant to such acqutAtion of right-of-way, Lone
Star Gas Company is required to relobate certain pipelines and
facilities; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the contract between the City of
Denton and the State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation, the City will reimburse Lone Star Gas for the cost
of utilities relocation and the State will reimburse the City of
the eligible relocation costs paid by the Cityl and
WHEREAS, the reimbursable coat of the utilities relocation by
Lone Star Gas Company has been determined to be in amount of
Twenty-ehrea Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-eight and No/100 Dollars
(=43,488.00) to be paid by the City with reimbursement to the City
by the Stats of the el°gitle relocation costs; and
WHEREAS, Lone Star Gas Company has requested that the City of
lenton, by resolutions authorize the payment of the utilities
relocation coat prior to the beginning of tae relocation work;
NOW0 THEREFORE, BE IT R VOLVLD BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DENTOO :
SECTION 1.
Tiiat thn City Manager is hereby authorized, in accordance with
the CYty of Denton's contract with the State Department of
Highways and Public Transportation, to make payment to Lone Star
Gas Company for its eligible cost in relocating its utility
facilities as a result of the acqquisition of right-of-way for
Highway Loop 288, the estimated ali ible coati thereof being in
the amount of Tvanty-three Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-eight and
Na/100 Dollars ($23,488,00), and the actual cost to be submitted,
determined and paid upon completion of tha relocation work.
SUITION 11.
That• this resolution shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1485.
CITY OF DSNTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
LHARLOTTE ALLIM CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,sTLW
APPKOVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA ADAMI URAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY or DI:MN, TLW
J l
w
CIT'V OI DBNTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: Septembor 24, 1985
TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
FROM., Roger N. Wilkinson, Right of Way Agent
SUBJECT: Loop 288 relocation
lone Star Gas Company is requesting a resolution from the City
of Denton approving and authorizing reimbursement for Utility
relocation of their facilities. Their cost estimate of
$24,342.00 and $4,014.00 was approved for a reimbursement of
82,831 by the state. The City would be required to pay a
maximum of $23,487.27 ($24,342.00 + $4,014,00 x 82,831 ■
$23,487,27) and the state would reimburse the City 901 of
$23 487,27 which would be $21,138,55, so the actual expenditure
would be $29348.72.
Roger N. Wilkin3on
Right of Way Agent
is
1031913
=%f T
.iJ .r,..
u i r
y,1~L
1`
COMMISSION
rONEAT C tANIER, CAAlrutAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MARK K a G ENG~~' 0 C,00%
AOREAtH.UEOMAN 0t
.OHN A E{UhER, A P. 0, box 3067
D31111a, T.exau 75221-3067
July 18, 1985
W nEPIY REFER to
Utility Adjustment, U1-1710 FILE NO
Lone Stir Gas tompan"-v
Denton County
CSJ 2250-02-002
8018-1-57
S.H, Loop 288: Prom US 380, ttortii and West
To WOst of FM 428
Mr. G, Chris Hartung
City Hanager
City of Denton
215 Easy, McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Doar PIr. Hartung:
141 are pleased to advise that the subject Utility Adjustment is 82.83%
eligible for State coat pLirticipation. You are requested to advise Lone
Stnr Gas Compr.ny to proceed with their work. A few clays before c1icy plan
to start work, they should furnish written notification to our engineer aft
to the date when work will begin. Likewise, they should again furnish
written notification as to the date when all work hats been completed.
Prior to or at the time of final billing, we will need executed copies
of Form D-15-24A, Utility Joint Use Agreement, and an executed copy of
Form D-15-30, Quitclaim, covering tho abandoned property interest appli-
cable to the regular facility.
Hr. Dwight Bird Is our ongincer in charge of this project. Ho may be reachad
by telephone in Denton at 817-387-1414. His mailing adiress is P. 0, Box 20230
Denton, Texas 76201, Mr. Bird should be contacted concerning any changes in
Ils3t. L'llltt.
ole. F;OW 0"i?, ..r Plop. Mgmt.... a very~r y
Asst. ROW E::gr.
Enq
Eng eer
r
.AW6 r• j U111. District
fight BArd w/attachments
dufX`( r
►landla t f ..............~.-..-•-r
y.
r !y 1"41 C : i41" u d i xr l^'d 5', v
OM A. WILU6 Lone Star Ga W Company " 4 r^ ~
R«wi c«+nl~ a 341s. NWW6W S"W , 00FIM 16101/5201 1,.
so" lev"tsw. April 1, 1983
` Mr. Chris Hartung,
City Manager
City of Denton
213 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Subjects Line R/W 3 iJ< 6
District Regulator 018
S. H. Loop 288
Hwy. Acct. 08018.1-37
Denton County, Texas
r Mr. Hartungi
A review has been completed of our April 24, 1984 cost estimate regarding the
subject Highway project.
Enclosed are 6 copies of revised estimates and plans for the relocation of
approximately 284 feet of 6-Inch Pipeline F-1, and abandonment of approxi-
mately 263 feet of existing 6-inch pipel also the relocation of an existing above
ground regulator facility.
Estimated cost for alteration of Line F-1 is $24,342,00, of which 20% will be at
Lone Star Gas Company's expertise and 80% ($19,474.00} will be at the City's
expense. (See enclosed copy of original right-ot-way map.) Estimated cost for
r,~locatlon of the regulator facility remains $4,014.00.
ease furnish this office outtt rylW.,rw~w~t oil t> arM 4tewgd .
on thirrlro*tt lrt the^esfimate amount of $23,488.00. hen this authorizatlon
Is reeelved,. Y wilt beu frt a podelm► Ito .pursue this matter. 1_ o O t S t" 6 t4
We have not providrd a Form D-13-U1 for the regulator feelllty, since no
separate easement was taken for the existing regulator facility, which has been
continually In operation since Its Installation in 1963.
Upon completion of the alteration work, you will be furnished an Itemized
invoice as to the actual cost Incurred.
--7777
t r.Hartung
Inge 12:19x1
Should you have any questions coxerning our cost estimates and plans,! will be
happy to meet with you at your convenience to discuss this matter
detail. In greater
Sincerely,
g A$ W 1!!s ~
S
GAW:DCrrb
Enclosures
cc: S. T. Worthington, Jr.
Anita Jones
B. I Thogmartin
1
i
REVISED
ESTIMATED :16ITEP.IAL COST TO COSSTRUCT APKIJXI`IATELY
184 FEET OF 6-INCH LIFE F1 BETWEEN
APPROXIMATE STATIONS 53+81 AND 55+65
TO CONF0%%1 TO STATE HIGHWAY 288 CONSTRUCTION IN
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
DESIGN WORKING PRESSURE OF 500 PSIG
DATE: JANUARY 21, 1485
Material
284 Ft. 6.625" 0-D., 12.91#0 .188" Wall, API-5L Grade X-42
Seamlesv or E.W. Line Pipe (Class 2) @ $6.25/Ft, $ 1,175
I
1 Ea. 6" x 2" Weld Reducer Tee 85
4 Ea. 6" 45° Long Radius Welding Ella 312
284'Ft. of 6" Coating & Wrapping of Pipe @ $0.20/Ft. 57
6 Rolls of Tape Coating @ $22.50/Roll 135
2 Gallons of Primer m $17.50/Gal. 35
1 Gallon of Inhibitor @ $25.00/Gal. 25
5 Gallons of Methanol (Methyl Alcohol) @ $20.00/Gal. 100
1 £a. Cathodic Junction Box 30
20 Ft. No, 8 T,W. Stranded'Copper Wire @ $0.30/Ft. 6
1 Ea. Road Crossing Sign (Pipeline Marker) 20
1 Ea. Cathodic Test Lead installation 30
5 Ft. of 3/4" Conduit @ $1.00/Ft. 5
Miscellaneous Material, Acetylene, Oxygen, Coating
Between Joints, Bolts, Caskets, Etc. 131
Sales Tax 137
TOTAL COST FOR MATERIAL $ 2,C83
t.
Colt estimate
Line F1 Relotation
January 21, 1985
Page 2
n
Company Labor
1 Dist. Superintendent 16 hrs. @ $12 /hr. $192
1 General Supervisor 16 hre. @ 10/hr. 160
1 General Clerk It 4 hrs. @ 9/hr 36
1 Accountant 10 hrs. @ 10/hr. 100
1 Survey Crew 6 hre. @ 40/hr. 240
1 Draftsman 8 hre. @ 8/hr. 64
1 Engineer 10 hrs. @ 10/hr. 100
TOTAL COMPANY LABOR $ 892
Payroll Taxes, Insurance, Vacation Allowance, Retirement
Benefits, etc. (27.192 of Co. Labor) (Current Rate) $ 243
Equipment Expense
1 Passenger Car 250 Mi. @ $ .23/Mi. 57
1 Truck - 1/2 Ton 250 Mi. @ .23/Mi. 58
TOTAL EQUIPMENT EXPENSE $ 115
Storehouse Expense b Purchasing Costs (5.10% of Material) $ 147
Right-of-way Damages:
280 mct of Gas Lost @ $3.70/mcf $ 1,036
(1) Total Company Expense S 5,316
Contract Costs for Construction - Driver Pipeline $140900
Other Contract Costs - X-Ray b Inspectio:a $1.200
(2) Total Contract Expense $16,100
General Costs (12.42% of (1) + (2) . $2,660
Omissions 6 watingencies: 5% of (1) . $ 266
(3) Total Miscell.4neous Expense $ 2,926
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS (1) + (2) + (3) $24,342
Cott Estimate
Line F1 Relocation
January 21, 1983
Page 3
EST MATE SUMMARY TO RELOCATE PORTION OF LINE Ft
STATE HIMAY NO. 288
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
Total Construction Costs $ 249342
Plus Abandonments Charges (covering capping and filling
with water) * $ 250
Total Estimated Cost of Project $ 249342
2OX at Lone Star's Expense • $ 4,868
80% at Other's Expense w $19,414
* Included in Driver Pipeline Contract Cost
v
• !t {r 'i' 'dry 'I ?;''t'" Y j
%0 r
RECEIVED JUI 3 1 147R
COMMISSION S'rATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENOINEER•DIRECrOR
REAOAN HOUSTON, CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION S. L. DESERRY
OEWITT C. OREIR P. U. Box 3067 CNARLE11 E SIMON$ Dallas, Texas 75221
July 28, 1978
Denton County
8018-1-57
Loop 2881 From present north terminus of U. S. Highway 380,
north and west
To Ynterstatb Highway 35
Mr. Rick Svehla
Director of Engineering and Development
City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Svehla:
The fully executed Contractual Agreement for Right of Way Pro-
curement on subject project is forwarded herewith.
Expenditures by the City of Denton on behalf of this project
are eligible for consideration for State participation under
the terms of the contract.
As soon as we are in position to initiate work on this project,
we will advise.
Yours very truly,
ohn 0. Keller
District Engineer
KM1a
Attachment
cc1 Joe P. Maddox
Pa~,a' 1 0~ 5
Rave 7^tt
C04TRACTUAL AGREEMENT
FOR
RIGHT OF WAY PROCUREMENT
(CITY FORM)
STATE OF TEXAS COUNr. Do 8
PROJECT801-1-S 7
COUNTY OF TRAVIS X HIGHWAY Loop 288
This agreement entered into this _,_,_,.2,5 „ day of _ July , 14. 78
by and between the State of Texas, acting by acd through the State Department of Highways
and Public Transportation, hereinafter called the Statd, •nd etrX ep ne~r~n
Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized official under Ordinance dated
5th day of July. , 19 78 , hereinafter called the Citya
vAaR.FAS, the State has deemed it necessary to make cartain highway improvements on
Highway No. Loop 288 From ores•*+r~north tArminua of tr. A. wohwAy ?An~
s„orth &ad west To 1nteratate HtghWA3 35
_ and which section of highway improvements frill~Here"senate
the acquisition of certain right of way, and '
WHEREAS, it is agreed that such right of way purchase shall be by joint, effort of the
State and the City;
NOW, THEREFORE be it agreed that acquisition of such right of t,ay shall be in accordance
with the terms of thic contract and in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws
governing the acquisition policies for acquiring real property, The State hereby autho-
rizes and requests the City to proceed with acquisition and the State agrees to reimburse
the City for its at ire of the cost of such right of way providing such acquisition and
reimbursement are accomplished according to the provi>'xons outlined herein and agreed to
by both parties hereto.
LOCAATAGN_ SUR YS AND PREPARATION OF RIGHT OF NAY DAThe Statr,, without cost to the
City, will do the necessary -preliminary engineering end title investigation in order to
supply.to the City the data and instruments necessary to obtain acceptable title to the
desired right of way.
QETERMIINATION OF RIGHT OF HAY VALUES! The City agrees to make 2 determination of
property values for each right of way parcel by rethods acceptable to the City and
to submit to the State's District Office a tabulation of the values so determined,
signed by the appropriate City, representative. Such taLulations shall list the parcel
numbers, ownership, acreage, and recommended compensation. Compensation shill be shown
in the component parts of land taken, itemization of improvements taken, damages, if any,
(offset by enhancements, jLf any,) to the remainder, if any, and the amounts the total
compensation will be reduced if the owner retains improvements. This tabulation shat'
be accompanied by an explanation to support the determined values, together with a
copy of information or reports used in arriving at all determined values. Such work
will be performed by the City at its expense without cost participation by the State,
The State will review the data submitted and m,.y base its reimbursement on the values
as determined by this review. The State, how..ver, reserveA the right to perform at
Its own expense any additional investigation deemed necesseryr including supplemet,tal
• appraisal work by State emiloyees or by employment of fee appraisers, all as may be
necessary for detarmik4 tion'of values to constitute the basis for state reimbursement.
(See attached short w.teh is made a part hereof.) ,
Y
Peg 2 x,
Rev. 7'-77 .
If at any stage of the project '<;evelopment it is determined by mutual agreement
between the State and the City that there should be waived the requirement that
the City submit to the State property value determinations for any part or all
o: the required right of way, the City will make appropriate written notice to
the State of such waiver, such notice to be acknowledged In writing by the State.
In instances of such waiver, the State by its due processes and at its own ex-
pense will make a determination of values to,constitute the basis for State
reimbursement.
I
NEGOTIATIONS: The State will notify the City as soon as possible do to the State's
deter- mi~ nation of value.' Negotiation and settlement with the property owner will be
the responsibility of the City without participation by the State; however, the City
will notify the Mate immediately prior to closing the transaction so that a current
title investigation may be made to determine if there has been any change in the
title. The City will deliver properly executed deeds which together with any cura-
tive instruments found to be necessary as a result of the State's title investiga-
tion will properly vest title in the State for each right of way parcel involved.
Va costs incidental to negotiation and the costs of recording the right of way
instruments will be the responsibility of the City. The cost of title investiga-
tion will be the responsibility of thR State.
CONDEMMON: Condemnation p+uceedinga will be initiated at a time selected by the
City and will be the City's responsibility at its own expense except as hereinafter
indicated. The City will obtain from the State without cost current title inform&-
Lion and engineeting data at tt:~: time condemnation proceedings ere to be initiated.
Except as hereinafter set forth the City will concurrently Me condemnation pro-
ceedings and a notice of lis pendens for each case in the name _f the State, and in
` each case no filed the judgment of the court will decree title to the property con-
demned in the name of the State. The City will accomplish the legal procedures and
curative matters found to be necessary as a result of the State's title investiga-
tion, fulfilling the obligation to properly vest title in the State of Texas. The
City may, as set forth herein under "Excess Takings," and where it is determined
to be necessary, enter condemnation proceedings in its own name. Property acquired
in the City's name must comply with the requirements set forth in the engineering
data and title investigation previously furnished the City by the State at such
time.se the City conveys said property to the State.
COURT COSTS, COSTS OF SPEC M C "ISSIONERS' BEARINGS AND APPRAISAL EXPENSE: Court
costs and costs of Special Commissioners hearing9 assessed against the State or City
in condemnation proceedings conducted on behalf of the State and fees incident there-
to, will tie paid by the City. Such costs and fees, with the exception of recording
fees, will be eligible for 90 per cent State reimbursement under the established
reimbursement procedure provided such costs and fees are eligible for paymtnt by the
State under existing State law. Where the City uses the State's appraisers employed
on a fee basis in Special Commissioners' hearings or subsequent appeals, the cost of
the appru.iser of updating his report, of preparing new reports, preparing for court
testimony and appearing In court to testify In support of his appraisal, will be paid
direct by the City, but will b1i eligible for 90 per cent State reimbursement under
established reimbursement pre.:edure provided prior approval for much appraiser has
been ohtained from the State. The fee paid the appraiser by the City shall be in
accordance with the fee schedule oft forth in the appraiser's contract for appraisal
services with the State.
• •Rev. i~yr
EXCESS TAKINGS I In the event the City desire@`0 acgnire land in excess Of that re-
quested by the State for right 'of way purposes, the Statews cost participation wil be
limited to the property needed for right of way purposes. -if the City elects to it-
quire the entire praparty, in2luding the excess taking, by i,single instrument of con-
veyance or in one eminent domain proceeding, the pro arty involved will be acquired in
the name of the City and that portioo,requested by t~a State for right of way will be
conveyed to the State. When acquired by negotiation, the Statewa participation will
be based on the state's approved value of that part requested for right of ray pur-
poses, providing sueh approved vi%Iua does not exceed actual payment made by the City.
When acquired by condemnation, the Staters participation will be in the proportionate
part of the final judgment amount computed on the basis of the relationship of the
State's approved value to the State's predetermined value for the whole property.
IH.PRO~ St Property owners will be afforded an opportunity in the negotiations to
retain any or all of their improvements in the right of way taking. In anticipation
of the owner desiring to retain his improvements, the Staters approved value will in-
clude the amounts by which the upper limit of State participation will be reduced for
the retention. It is further agreed that the upper licit for the State's participa-
tion in the Cityts cost for an improved parcel will be reduced as shown in the State's
approved value whore the owner retai:,s an improvement which to to be woved by either
the City or the owner. In the event the improvements which are, in whole or part, a
part of the right of way taking are not retained by the owner, title is to be secured
in the name of the State. The State will participate in the acquisition of a structure
severed by the right of way line if the part of the house, building or similar struc-
ture outside the right of way cannot be reconstructed adequately or there is nothing
but salvage left, provided the State's value is established on this basis and provided
title to tit entire structure is taken in the twme of the State. The State shall dis-
pose of all improvements acquired. The net revenue derived by the State from the dia-
• position of any improvements sold through the Board of Control will be credited to the
cost of the right. of way procured and shared with the City.
RELOCATION OF UTI:LITIES% If the required right of way encroaches upon an existing
utility located in its own right of way and the proposed highway construction requires
the adjustment, removal or relocation of the utility facility, the State will estab-
lish the necessity for the utility work. State participation in the cost of making
the necessary change, less sny resulting increase in the value to the utility and less
any salvage value obtainable, may be obtained by either the "retigal cost„ or "lump
sum,( procedures. Reimbursement under "actual cost" will be reads ,subsequent to the
City's certification that the work has been completed and will be words in an amount
equal to 90 per cent of the eligible items of cost as paid to the utility rimer. The
"lump sum's procedure requires that the State establish tie eligibility of the utility
work and enter into a three party agreement with the owners of the utility facilities
and the City which sets forth the exact lump sum amount of reimbursement based on a
prior appraisal. The utility will be reimbursed by the City after proper certifica-
tion by the utility that the work has been done, said reimbursement to he on the basis ,
of the prior lump sum agreement. The State will reimburse the City in win amount equal
to 90 per cent of the firm comitmant as paid to the utility owrner. Tho foregoing is
subject to the provision that the individual lump sum approved value e411 not exceed
$204000, except as specifically approved by the Ctate. In those cases irhere a single
operation is estimated to exceed $20,0001 the trausactton will be brought to the atten-
tion of the State for determination of proper handling based upon thew circumstances
involved. Such utility firm commitment will be an appropriAte item of right of way.
Tt:e adjustment, removal or relocation of any utility line on publicly awned right of
way by sufferance or permit will not be eligible for State reimbursemew:. The term
"utility's under this contract shall include publicly, privately, and cooperatively
owned utilities.
'v." 2 k E x Y , x
~ to ^4, e. lsn i .,.y ~ .K N Sa '~-~fa
Page: 4 b"t 5
Revs' 7077
FENCING M UIREMKISc The City may either pay the property owner for his existing
right of way fences based on the value such fences contribute to the part taken and
damagep for an unfenced condition resulting from the right of way taking, in whith
case the estimated value~of such right of way fences and such damages will he In-
cluded in the recommended value and the approved values or the City may do the
fencing on the property owner's remaining property.
Where the City parfurmsiight of way fencing as a part of the total right of way
consideration, neither the value of existing right of way fences nor damages for
an unfenced condition will be included in the recommended value or the approved
value. State participation in the City's cost of constructing right of way fencing
on the property owner's remainder may be based either on the actual cost of the
fencing or on a predetermined lump sum amourt. The State will be given credit
for any salvaged fencing material and will .,.,t participate in any o~,erhsad coats
of the City.
If State participation is to be requested on the lump sum basis, the State and
the City will reach an agreement prior to the actual Accomplishment of work as to
the necessity, eligibility, and a firm commitment as to the ro.it of the entire
fencing work to be performed. The foregoing is subject to 6e provision that
the lump sum approved cost shall not exceed $20,0000 except as specifically
approved by the State. In case the fencing is estimated to exceed $20,000, the
transaction will be brought to the attention of the State for determination of
proper handling based upon the circumstances involved.
REIMSURSIWNPt The State will reimburse the City for right of way acquired
after the dar^ of this contract in an amount not to exceed 90 per cent of the
cost of the rigl;t of way acquired in accordance with the terms and provisions
of this agreement, The State's reimbursement will be in the amount of g0 per
cent of the State's predetermined value of each parcel, or the Fiat cost thereof,
whichever is the lesser amount.
If condemnation is necessary and title is taken ea set forth herein under the
section headed "Condemnation", the participation by the State shall be based on
the final judgment, conditioned that the State has been notified in writing prior
to the filing of such suit and prompt notice is also given as to all action taken
Oerein. The State shall have the right to become a party to the suit at any time
for all purposes, including the right of appeal at any stage of the proceedings.
All other items of cost shall be borne by the State and the City as provided by
other provisions of this agreement.
If a lump sum fencing or utility adjustment agreement has been executed the state
will reimburse the City in the amount of 90 per cent of the predetermined lump sum
cost of the right of way fencing or utility adjustment.
If the City prefers not to execute a lump sum agreement for either fencing or utility
adj.stments the State will reimburse on the actual cost of such adjustments. The
City's request for reimbursement will be supported by a breakdown of the labor,
materials and equipment used.
GENERAL: It is understood that the terms of this agreement shall apply to new
right of way authorised and requested by the State Department of Highways and
Public Transportation which is needed and not yet dclicated, in use, or previously
acquired in the name of the State or City for highway, street$ or road purposes.
10 This agreement shall also apply, as to any existing right of way, to outstanding
V:I
^rh~'' i+ t 4a. yt .A r ^reT', a#.:, ,tly5 l rJ,~
Form A-X5.37
Page S of
Rev. 7-77
property interests not previously acquired iind to eligible utility adjustments
not previously made, as authorized and requtated by the State Department of Highways
and Public Transportation.
It is understood that this contract shall bo effective from and after the date of
full execution by the State of Texas,
it is further understood that if unusual circumstances develop in the right of way
acquisition which are not clearly covered by the terms of this agreement, such un-
usual circumstances or problems will be resolved by mutual agreement between the
State and the City.
CITY OF TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS
BYs - Certified as being executed for the
yor purpose and effect of activating and/or
carrying out the orders, astabUshed
policies, or work pr,)gra" heretofore
approved and authorised by the State
Highway and Public tr&nsportation
Commies 3
By
St to Engineer-Director f Highways
and Public Transportation
Executed and approved for State HS&hway
`i and Public Transportation Commission
under authority of Commission Hinute
70104.
ATTESTi RECOHNENDED FOR APPROVAL
strict Engineer
7 Program Engintl r
Chief Engineer of Highway Design w,-
kit of Way Engineer
y; 31 l.
• In accordance with Paragraph #2, under the heading "DETERMINATION
OF RIGHT OF NAY VALUES", herein, the County hereby raquests, and
the State agrees, that the State, by its due procestoo and at
its own expense, will make the determination of vatu-se to ccn-
stitute the basis for State reimbursement.
(Attached Sheet)
1
i
.•'1., ',11A Y a I~ i`. ls4,1 rl.. 64•~ i•.1
S.Y.
1
. 1
' Ti 0: til'AITI 01: 7F 4S
'COll,YIY OF DINIUM
MY 01.0 DWI
I, Brooks liolt, City Secretary of tiro City of'Acnton, Tcxns, do
• hereby CSR'' fY tlhati the attached is a tnre and correct copy of '
passed and npv(xi by the
ty a g o ty"ol-Fcrrto», foxrrs, on the clay (Nr.
19 , as Smilro appears ofi 'cord in my
Off icer~, - 14 no
In Witness Micrcoi, I havo hereunto sct roy-lnna and lho of 'cia
• seal of the City of Denton, T'cxas this do) of ,
A.U• 19-2y-.
rc~ohs• dolt ,
City Sccretaary
+ City of l)cnton, Texas
.
1 '
•
,
,
.
0 U , N
r4 a
PIP 00 W
/1 1
Q y O
co 0
N O kk~
r W 1
A +7 (s. u r 41 14 W H ca 00
0 0 'O N W O 'f{ r1
d o o 3 u 0 A4 .0 P
A o
9 V A N o X00 u U d
x a o u p
to W 41 p x b w 9 z
0 (1 1 V)
4 C)
O OI N u O 60
q
N 1 A
.0 0
4 z ►-+I N u ~ a to O H W
H p N O a0 ro F-+ p
z O HI u ° N a N pC ro
o Z o l b a A. ,u 00 44° 44 £ A
41 41 10
A a o u 0 01
41 41
• ± ~ ~
of a
N 1 w q p ro a, y
aoi ~ H b N ro
t: d W f >
A ro J.1 60 ro •b
3 u Ln 44 4- a a O
H O W
LL U 4 41 y M O V t-1 r.{ A O
O '
~ ~J ro u •O pq
u
z •a .+C CI x u' cd ~C ro O W
ro v d
H U e0 •aD to 3 ~ N N
W d CO 4.1 W y yyv~~~ W
o r. 41
U
►y v o u • ',t oo a~ u N u H
w ro a k W u 4j u A aO
~x u O u P 41 W A 4' O u vi ' H N
,c0 p 0 o qp O A
d A. ' 4 H z O 'O i u LO l x k. A
< JA
~ ~~,,y r. 'f.fl4 a .'Y ~ F~ n ;f6` r., •h. ,4' l r
~
d 1220E i
cam'. ~ i
R E S 0 L U T 1 0 H
WHEREAS, the City of Denton and certain businesses located in
Denton recognise the need for the improvement of the southbound
frontage road of Interstate Highway 35-H from Airport Road south
to its terminus and to the intersection of Airport Road and the
frontage road to enlarge the turning radii to aliL;w for tractor
trailer turning movements as well as the need for an entrance ramp
from the frontage road onto southbound Interstate Highway 35-WI
NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP
DENIM
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas does hereby
petition the State Highway commission to appropriate funds and
authorize tha construction of the aforementioned improvements;
AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Secretary is hereby
directed to forward copies of this Resolution to the members of
the State Highway Commission,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
RICH D 0. - AAT, M Y R
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESP3
CORM AMEN, ECRSTARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO !.FOAL FORM!
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYs
11 XIV,
October 198S
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBrRS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consider Final Particin:tion Cost for Water Line and Sewer
Line Oversize Agreement-Meadows Mobile Home Park-Holigan
Development.
R6COMMENUATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September
180 1985, recommended to the City Council approval of
amount $53,764.08 for water and $6,446.30 for sewer as the
City's share of the oversize agreement.
SUMMARY
The Utility and the Purchasing Department staff have worked
out the City's share in cost based on cost difference in
material used in this project. Per the attached table, the
dollar amount worked out to be $53,764.08 for water and
$6,446.30 for sewer. The construction of the line is
complete.
BACKGROUND
The oversize agreements were approved by the Public
Utilities Board and, suL•sequently, by the City Council at
its meeting of January 8, 1985. When the City was in the
process of receiving bids for this project, it was found
that the developer had already started the construction.
Hence, the bid was pulled off and at a meeting wfth the
Developer, it was decided to calculate cost difference in
material only for payment. It is believed that it is only
fair to do so in the absence of no-comparable previous bids
on such project. Subsequently, at the time of project
completion, the City Inspector checked the quantity of
materials and the material cost difference was calculated
per attached exhibits.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Denton Municipal Utilities, City Engineer, the developer,
and citizens.
3934US20
[ wl~ N .,.y ti~
..FISCAL IMPACT
Eater Line Oversize
F1 85 budgeted estimate 8" to 16" Water
Line, 4,560 LF $47,880.00
Actual cost to City (8" to 16" Water
Line, 4,768 LFA) $S30764.08
Source of funds: Water bonds- 623.008-0461-5138-7919
Aactual quantity installed is more than estimated quantity.
Sewer Line Oversize
FY 8S budgeted estimate 10" to 12" sewer
line, 5,420 LF $10,840.00
Actual cost to City (10" to 12" 6 15" c.ewer
line, 2,785 LF) $6,446.30
Source of funds: Sewer bonds- 624-008.0471-9138-9745
"actual quantity installed is less than estimated quantity.
Pre pared by: R p@c idly ub ted,
Srini Sunderamoorthy c ve a
Civil Engineer Acting City Manager
Ap uved
R. E. Nelson
Dir^ctor of Utilities
Exhibit
I Cost Tabulation- Water Line Oversize
11 Cost Tabulation- Sewer Line Oversize
III Approved schedule of pipes and fittings installed
IV Location Map
V Minuf^t PUB Meetins of 9/18/85
VI Reso.a, =ion
39340:21 ,
• MEADOWS MDIULC FIOM6 PA IL
>~•TO 11•" wn1U LIAI_. C OYETt pARTIGjrp~o~a
ITEM DFSCRIPrioAj VOWT Gorr 7617AL air cosr vlrrcRtmer
.Z, 416" PIPE, ♦'Ta4 L.F' d Is•Ta 7'5,141.6!
4i Z4'/'4Q
tti ! t" r11i 47a4 1-F fi b•9o 3 20 84'T•20
R J !i' XfL" ~'SE f CAC11 5y1•SS 641.36
80. r a'' X S` TEE iiml „_391 ^3 y" _
16p.po Ibooo
r to 1i 6" Tir 7~!'ACII .~Sl.pn 3R16•bo
00. WE , .INo•oo ; ~ 980'00 -
11 ✓ 4" IC 04" RlOVCIR 4 LACH ~oi• $16 do
IIQ / NOT A►PNLAffLIr - • --slatA_Q_ .
rr 64t 4e
1i 06" X 16P CAVIL I 9.A6N 64q-49
11S•oo 19ti e0
IS 1 iwni 1 74" CAS!VCs 611 LF rjybb•OD
~o•4d x IwZ~op
130. bG17L' 1 11i" , G1S1NC~ 69' LF i - _ . _
3>1•so „ 3C 1e-no
r.....•. 44x1...\_-_
15 / I L" PI.vG+ 1 CAC 1+ 11Fy
I
tZ 11ry~!
11; A• r s" PcuA, I crf~If - .....C :11..
34,1tir Mfir
IL" 6ATF VALVE 6'CAM
(h l7~t•ID /O1lylp So9PO0
g5aao ~,yno•oo
a
y ' WAI. .~3,7a4.o6
• yllliRiN~i
r•. fitrr i11r !•a..r.T It,heIL to it 1aso A
i-,
® MEADOWS M0126114 H Ara PARIL
!OY' TA I2 rj" 9mIWg OVERSItE
NIM DI SC/l!1!!ON Co>;Y DI►CS Rsuti
UIUIT mr TOTAL GO'.Y
Ia." Vs It" b'S
I 1s" saR 35 PYG Iepg 9177LF ! at 40 12:1 111. o0
Y I,7bl• 00
la 10" Sort is 777 LP' of-60
2 1611 D• T,• f GA6101 loo LI: 9y pp - =1}pn.pp y ~O.OO..
1a It f 7 100 LA 7I OU 74101 _
3 17" sort 315 P. ]2 e.7 axLIF Ib oo 4 3!,3t2.4
n ~~.glt 3D
3a Io" salt iI pvc. 2i07.45 l.rn I~r•o~l t 3o, 107. 1o _
'~G4k6. 30
W
a '
16" Water Liss to Ksadors Mobile 60411 Perk
WIT MAMMY ZXT1N§ION
• f
1. 8" X 8" Tapping Sleeve i
~ Valve
16" pips 660.00 1 each 660.00
pipe 15.76 LF 4700 74x072.00 /
16" Cate Valve 6190 LF 165 LF 11138.50
`2" Blowol! Valve 10794'00 6 ditto 10,794.00
✓g• 69'
8" Cate Volvo 10 2 •~c 170.00
+~J 6" Cate Valve 269.00 2 each 538.00
/8. 16" X 16" Tee 176.19 7 each 11233.33
l6" X 6" Tes 541433 1 each 541.351
1010:
fire Rydrant 498.00 7 each MUM..,
. 8" X 16" Reducer 430.00 7 each 3j130.40
16" X 16" Cross 206.50 4,esch 026100/
g) 70649.48 1 each 649.48 ✓
3. Bore under McKinney (24" casin
14. Mister Motor Vault .00 LF 68 LP 4,760.00 ✓
434 16" Plug 2.500.00 1 each 20500.00
16. Sand 6.00 14 *00 1 each 144.92 /
17. $onda Cy 300 CY 18800000
I$- Labor b Equipment 1183 Manhro 2.51 $1330436.84 3,255.00
$14230.93 Equip 237 Brw$11839.13=$230118.26
Alternate
2s. 8" hater Line 6.90 4700 LF
U. 8" Tte 150.00 1 each 329430.00
904. 8" X 6" Tee 140.00 7 each 150.00
Us, Not necessary 980.00
12e. 8" Cross 195.00 1 each
13s. Bore under McKinney 14" Casing 38.50 LF 68 LP 195600
1304. 8 Plug 34.15 1 each 21618.00
178. Bond 39,15
2.51
Items 2+8+9+i, + 12 + 13+ 15 + 17 •
$87,934.15
Items 2a + Be + 9& + lla + l2a + 13a + 15a + 17a . -382465`15
Total difference 8" to 16" $499269.60
Total cost of 16" Water Line (No profit for RDI) $133.436.84
Coo
t .
I
J~J
rr Niai~';_,ZT~ 1
6565 61*YdnO ft Ftsswsly I Suits 800 1 South Tower 1 0811 . Tex" 75247 1 (214) 6,314031
July 310 1965
John Marshall
Purchasing Department
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, TX 76201
REs McDonnal-Meadows outfall Sanitary Sever
Alt A - actually installed
7. 15" SDR 35 PVC 577' a $21 $12,117
2. 16" Ductile iron 100' 1 $24 2,400
V): ~~12" SDR 35 PVC 2209' 6 $16 35o344
4. ~sVj, SOR-3S-PYC 0:1 P 60' a $12
720
5. 48" Manholes 9 0 $1250
11,250 ,
6. Concrete Encasement b Pitting 11000
i
$62,831
. Alternate S
1. 10" SDR 35 577' 8 $18 $10,386
2. 12" Ductile iron 100' 6 $21 2000
3. 10" SDR 35 PVC 2209' B $14 30,926
4. 8" SDR 35 PVC 60' 0 $12 720
8" manhole 9 e $1250 1};
oncrate Encasement b Pitting
1156,382
Actual Inatalled $62,831
Required by City 55,382
Amount of
participation
by City $ 7,449
Sincerely,
f I
8-T. Sanders
HTS/cbe
Nldd~
11 4 • • r r
• vi • . F
tj %:a Be ll, k 1
00 41
•r , ` . ■ ;
• _ Y
ON 0 411
C L
0.6
✓ W r1 ! 1
,
%
1
~ ~ •1'l~'rr ' , r
t
w. •
• r i r, V 1~ • , •~i,
♦ 1
dINDO
1 • Iii= ' 04
• -i' • 41 '
• •
foo'
J t I;N~•
.t 1 *40
1 jo
00
do, 49
• •
1.~
. y
1 Jw.. Y r , ~11
I M.
to,
.
• •ow* 11•I• / •r 7I.~w.,r ..•rw • T+1r w•,'L
k
d
21-
y
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING
September 18, 1985
CONSENT AGENDA:
as Consider Proposed Oversize Agreement with WINDSOR
WEST ADDITUN W,H. SMITH OWNER AND/OR HIS
for a new Water line.
Thompson made a motion to recommend approval, Frady
seconded the motion. All ayes, nn nayes, motion
carried.
b. Consider proposed Water Line Pro Rata Agreement
with WINDSOR WEST ADDITUN W.H. SMITH OWNER AND/OR
H1S 5 M.,
Motion was made by Coomes. Boyd seconded the motion.
All ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
c. Consider Particippation cost {CERTIFICATE OF FINAL
COST for Water Lime and Sewer Line 0"vers ze
Agreement, MEADOWS MOBILE HOME PARK,_ HOLIGAN
DEVELOPMENT-M,
Thompson made motion, Motion was seconded by Frady,
All ayes, no nayes, motion carried,
d. Consider Final Payment CIP Project 85-S-9 WOODROW
LANE SEWER fo-31US CONSTAUCI'ION in the Mount
o , ..r
Coomes made motion. Boyd seconded motion, All ayes,
no nayes, motion carried.
e. Consider Final Paarme_n~t, GIP Project 85-WP-6 HIGH
SERVICE PUMP fr-T9 ALLATTQN TO RED RIVER CONSTRUCTM
IN THE U T OF 4I 515.
Thompson made motion. Seconded by Frady. All ayes,
no nayes, motion carried,
R