HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 8, 2012 AgendaAGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
May 8, 2012
After determining that a quonim is present, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas will
convene in 2"d Tuesday Session on Tuesday, May 8, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Worlc
Session Room at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas at which the following items
will be considered:
NOTE: A 2"d Tuesday Session is used to explore matters of interest to one or more City Council
Members or the City Manager for the purpose of giving staff direction into whether or not such
matters should be placed on a future regular or special meeting of the Council for citizen input,
City Council deliberation and formal City action. At a 2"d Tuesday Session, the City Council
generally receives informal and preliminary reports and information from City staff, officials,
members of City committees, and the individual or organization proposing council action, if
invited by City Council or City Manager to participate in the session. Participation by
individuals and members of organizations invited to spealc ceases when the Mayor announces the
session is being closed to public input. Although 2"d Tuesday Sessions are public meetings, and
citizens have a legal right to attend, they are not public hearings, so citizens are not allowed to
participate in the session unless invited to do so by the Mayor. Any citizen may supply to the
City Council, prior to the beginning of the session, a written report regarding the citizen's
opinion on the matter being explored. Should the Council direct the matter be placed on a
regular meeting agenda, the staff will generally prepare a final report defining the proposed
action, which will be made available to all citizens prior to the regular meeting at which citizen
input is sought. The purpose of this procedure is to allow citizens attending the regular meeting
the opportunity to hear the views of their fellow citizens without having to attend two meetings.
1. Receive a report and hold a discussion concerning the Denton County Transportation
Authority's A-train service schedule, bus operations and public transportation services.
2. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the request to name
the Rail Trail pedestrian bridge over Loop 288 after Martin Luther King, Jr.
3. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding activities relating to
the City's Gas Well Inspections Division; Phase II amendments relative to the City's
drilling and production regulations; and the enacted gas well moratorium.
Following the completion of the 2"d Tuesday Session, the Council will convene in a Closed
Session to discuss the following:
1. Closed Session
A. Consultation with Attorney - Under Texas Government Code Section 551.071,
Deliberations regarding Economic Development Negotiations - Under Texas
Government Code Section 551.087.
1. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding legal issues on matters
regarding the leasing of land and financing of a City facility on University
of North Texas property located at I-35 and North Texas Boulevard where
such discussion presents a conflict between the duty of the City's
attorneys to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of
Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas and the provisions of the
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 8, 2012
Page 2
Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code.
Also hold a discussion regarding the leasing of land and financing of a
City facility for economic development purposes on University of North
Texas property located at I-35 and North Texas Boulevard, including
financial information related to such activities from a business prospect.
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of ineeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the
City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 2012 at o'clocic
(a.m.) (p.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ROOM IS
ACCESSIBLE 1N ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT.
THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE 1NTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING
IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED
MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 349-8309 OR USE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-
RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED
THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY' S OFFICE.
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: May 8, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Transportation Operations
ACM: Jon Fortune �
SUBJECT
Receive a report and hold a discussion concerning the Denton County Transportation Authority's
A-train service schedule, bus operations and public transportation services.
BACKGROUND
Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) staff has requested the opportunity to brief the
Denton City Council on proposed service level revisions for the A-train. Over the past several
months, DCTA staff has reviewed ridership data and conducted rider surveys in an effort to
identify options for expanding A-train service and provide more transit opportunities to Denton
County citizens. The ridership data suggests the current orientation of the late night service,
promoting later trips south bound from Denton to Dallas, is opposite of ridership demand.
DCTA staff is recommending a tweak to the A-train service to allow riders to return from Dallas
north bound to Denton by aligning the A-train service to linlc up with the last north bound DART
Green Line train to Trinity Mills. This would allow DCTA to respond to ridership feedbacic
indicating a desire for later north bound service with north bound A-train service departing
Trinity Mills between 12:30 am and 12:45 am. DCTA staff is also recommending the addition
of mid-day train service during weelcdays and discontinuing the current mid-day bus service.
DCTA staff briefed the DCTA Board on these proposals during the April 26, 2012, DCTA Worlc
Session and indicated that proposed service level enhancements are financially sustainable in
their five-year forecast. DCTA staff has targeted Augtist 20, 2012, as the effective date should
any revisions to service be approved. To meet this schedule, the DCTA Board will need to
consider the proposals at the May 24, 2012 DCTA Board meeting.
The DCTA presentation will also provide the City Council an update regarding bus service in
Denton. DCTA staff will facilitate this report with a PowerPoint presentation. The presentation
was not available at the time this document was prepared, but it is expected to cover the
following topics:
Agenda Information Sheet
May 8, 2012
Page 2 of 2
A-train
• Options for Friday night service
• Proposed Saturday service revisions
• Adding mid-day service
• Integration of Stadler Rail Cars
• Fare Boundary
Bus Operations
• Bus Ridership
• Bus to Rail Connectivity
• Bus Maintenance Facility
EXHIBITS
DCTA Board of Directors Memo dated Apri126, 2012
Respectfully Submitted:
f��� �- ����
Mark Nelson
Transportation Director
�C�Ci4�'s��",�``,�`I�)i�l ��!.
� �
� I
�
x � ` � „ �'^ 1� , � ' . � d � i
����gr��r��
I�� C��c�r��i�r, ��TA� ����at��d ���rvi�� �I�;n t�i�� is��I���I'�d ���ri�� c�� r��ocr�rr����t�i�ti��rs
f�ar i����A-t��r� ��rvic�� i��°r�r���r��r�t�. �"h���; �r��ar�����rtt� i�c�l�d�c� in�r���ir�� th� ���n
�F ��r�r�� or� �h� �gtr�ir� �r�� ir���rca�ir�g �����1�ctic�r�� ��t�v���� t��r7�it r�r�����. ��i�, t���r�
cr��������� � c�a���i�i��r��t� vvi�e� �urv�e� t� �����r ;� b�tt�r �nd�r�t�r��ir�� �f t��r�sit r�e�c��
���c� pri��iti�� T�i� r��u8t�. ��y fir�c�ir��� �r��f g�r�p����l �����r�s vv��� �r��c�s�tl�ci t�� t6��
���bl�c �t � r���n� r�f p�bl�c rr7��:tin� it1 ��rl,y fl��r�h. A�ur�rr���ry r�f �I�� ���r�r����t�
r���i��� �rr��� tl�o�;� r���ti��g� i� �tt�cl��d.
��s�d �n th� p��k�li�. f��d��c4� ��c�i��d �r��, �P�� r�vi��r �f t�� ���h�rit�'� fir��nc�i��
c;�p��;ity�. C��T�, �t�f� �� g�arc����ir�� �i�� ��allc��rin� ��t �f �������� f�r �r����t�t�a� t�a th�
���rr� ir� �pri��, �:yr�ti��r�t�t����s t� �h� p�a�alic ir� E��y �nci �ci��ta�r7 k�� tY�� k�o��d i� �i��:
E��T� ����f i� pr�p��ir�� ��� f�ll�v�ic�� ��tir�r�� f�ar ir�plerr����t�ti�rM �n ������� 2C�, �C���
� ���irni�� ��r�n��ti�rb t�pparku��tw�:s 9����+e�;r� ��F�m� �r�d ���`A �rrd' �st�rir� �h�
���� �y���r� vvith�ut n����r��6� �rr������r�g fh� Ic�e�6 �y�„t�rr�.
� �tic�dify ��t�r��y �ch�d�l� t� prc�nel� �n ��rli�r iriq �ithc��G� �c��ir�� c�����ti��
�����.
�'��ave f�r� b�tar�d�ry tc� Trir�i�� �ill�.
�cl�f �nid�d�y ,�-t��ir� s�rvi�� �i�rd �€ic�ir��t� IU6i�-��y �t��i�r7 �hu���e.
��r�t�n�.�� �ri��y n��ht ��r�ic� €��at r��a�fi���e t� k�e�'t�r rr���t ���rr�����1.
���,� st�f� v�i11 c�ar��ir�u� tr� �tu�� �c�r ir���l��n���7t��ic�n �r7�1 �����c1ir�� in F`�'1.�
�,�dditi�ari�l bu� s��vic� �r� C��r��c�n �nc� L��ris�rill� tc� iA���r��� cc�r�c���fi��� ����I
����7� c�� ��rvi��
��;T,� �t�ff n���� � rr�ii�irrry���� c�f 7� �i�y� �ri�� t� th� irn��l�rx��n��tEC�i� c�f s��vic� c�������
�a �h�t �����r�c��r� ir���rm�tic��� rr��t�r��9s �;�n i�� ��d�t�� a�i� c�i�tr��ut�c9.
�d�:�t����d ���
�id-d�� ��tr�ir� ��1r�vi�� �rill ir�c�r���� rid���hi� �n�, t��tt�r rr���� �t�� r����'� �F ���
c�rr�-��r7��irr� �ur��ic. Cv��di�i��ti�rr� �� ��id�� r�i�l�� �r�� ���ur��y rr��r��i�c� °,�ill �r�vi�� b�tt�r
trrp ��a��rt�tr�i�t�� ��� �i��r���r���r� �r��r�C��� ��� �r� t��� I�r�g 't�rrn ��aL�il� ��T�"� r������r
rid�;r�hip b���. Fri��� ni�t�t ��rvi�;� {�� ��arr�r�tl�r �c�nfi�ur�d} �� r��� p�r�c�rr��r�t� a� vv�IC ��
�r�t��.���t�� irr t�rr�� ca� ri�i�r�hip. F�i�t�ri� d�t� �i��� 1C�1�l����€ i� �������d ����� �vit�� �
�����rr��ry ��pl��°���i�r�, i�i� r�r�r�rn��c��c� �I�n i� tr� r��lign t�t� ��e°�i�� tc� r���:t
id����ifi�c� �r��c�� �nc� ���-��� �i����.
l��i� i� h���ir�� �u��i�; ����tir��� ir� (�t� A�ri�/��r�y ���. Ciir��ti�f� f`��c�r�� ih�; ����. ���r��
c�f �}ir�c��r� �� �t��d�t� t� �II�� s1.�ff �c� ����r��;� t�i� �i��l r���r�rr��n��kic�r�� t� tl�ac� ���lic�
f�r th� �u���t ��, ��i�� ��rvi�� c�7�����,
-�s-
�l`tilc�r�����ic�s7 �d
F����r��i�l ����ct
��a ��c�r�nr���d��c th��; ��9�iitic�rG caf rr�i���d�y �-�r�in ��rv��� crs� Aa.�����ti �C�, �C�1�, �i�
��r��r��r��r�� t� ���� �`�i:� k���d��t i� r���ir�� l+� �rc���w�r�����t� t��� �r����i�r�ai ����ra�����
�c���s. �i�� c�l��r���� t� �ric��y� �r�� ����rc��y c�� r��i ir�����t tl�� budc��fi. ��h€� �°��i��d �;��h
flc��,+ r�r����l, �i�cu�s�ci ir� it�rr�r �c, ir�c,c�r�c�f��t�� th��� I�v�l� c�f �c�rvies� v�rhi�� rr���n��in����
���fA f���rr�;i�l ��licy �t�r���rc#�.
��a��a��r�d��i��
ii�i� i� � cii�c��s��r�r� it�rr� c�r�ly.
� ���
�ir��� ��vi��nr: �`���_,��.� ��'�`'�
��'�� �.���
�6ic�� Pr��i��rdk
�, ��� �� �1 � ;,
,�,��rc�v��: � ���,.��=' �'�°�..��._._ j,
.
J� rr��� �. ��ir��, J��., �.�
��id�r�t
-76-
�V������������ ��
�� '�" �� F��„f �.�� �� � �� �- ��� ��.��&i� ���wr�r��, �+����� �c��� ��� ����
�����r
��im��y ���r��n ��r�ai�e
� F r°nvic�ir�c� rrii�md�y s������;� shc�ul� ��e #��� tc��� �rr�c�rity.
6 �'r�avid�s �d�ifi�r��! t�i�.� c�ppca�t�r�i�i��� f�rv �tu�i�r7ts.
- �r���ric��� �dditii�n�G i1��i�ility to� �����drz �v���iin� i� c�a t� C��II�� ��r lunc�l�.
��t�ri��d ��°id��f����rd���������i ���rY��
- ��a���ir��;r l�al�rilc�in� � ����e�d�.�l�� th�� �Il�v�s pec��l� t�a �2t�.n�i �t���� �r�c� �t9a�e�ri�4�� ��r���� �t
th� �rr��r�c�n Airiin�� �ent�r.
- F��r� s�r�i�� f�t�i� r�r� �ric��y� �r�c9 ��taai�c��y r�i�i�t�.
a Pr�vid� ���-vi�� c�rr �unc�ay� F�r sp����l c�v�r���.
. �CT� ����a�d rt�n ��eci�l ir��n� fc�r- �v�nt� iif�� �3�� ���;nt�ri �n�� l�rts �nc� J���.
- �A�� ��tvic� c���;� n�t rr��rr�r ��tr�ii� ���Tvic� �c� ��c��l� ��r�'t r��t �c� ��u�r�;.
�-t���� ����cital�
- ���c�uv re�c��r�hi� �t kh�� r���t �-r���t�r�g tc� c���r�c�e�istr�t� v�h�r� ��r��l� ��� i���a�i€r-�-�.
- �:C�i� �.m. �e���� fr� ��� fca� ��rl� tc� st�rt s�r�ir�,
- �:O�i �.r�. is n��c�e� e�pe�;i�ll� f�r p���l� lr�u�lin€,� ir� Fe�rt �'��r�l�.
- ��;ti�r ror�r���iic���s v�rith �AF��i�.
� :��r�� c�f th�: C3A�Tf,�-�r�in c��c��t;�:i�r�� �r� t�� �i�l�t,
= lf C�,��� i� runr�an� I�t� �nd rr�i���� �h� c;�nn��:ti�n v�i�h the �-ic���r�, tl��n p����r�e��r�a
sc�r��ti�r��� h�v� t�a w�€t ov�r an �r���,
- L�t�r �r��f���y t��u�� fc� ��rv� �ic�t�t �:I����s
_- �ervic� durinr� �f�e ��� h�e�vv��r� f�.�C7 �,r-�. �r�c� 8:Q(� �a.rm.
f�r��������;y i� r�d����d tcr� queckly �r� t��� ���rr��,�r� �e�&�. C7�T�'� ���4� ne�ca� t� ���; e�rii�r ia
��;r-v� ��ni��rsity �iud�t�t� k��.it I�t� �r��ugh i� ��rv� c;amrr�����r� cc�rr�ir�� b��k fr�i°r� C��61��,
- ��rii�r �aturei�y �r�i�r.
��� ����i��
a ,�t�ci rr�c�r� ��rvG�� in ��nt�r�.
g ��tt�� �c�r�r�����c�o°a� �� ��i� �n� the A-tr��n.
- C����r��� �caut� � �II y�:=.�r ��rc�un�i �an�i �li ��y.
a t��i� r���d� rr��ar� �r�c7�ency.
� �3�tt�r �n-tir�� {a�r���rm�r�c�
- ��r��°��ctic�r�� ���uv�er� k��a� rc�u�e� r���d i� �a� �rnp�c�v��.
- ���A �G.��e� ��7d t�-�is�s �hcsuid rr��et ��n���ctie�n�� �r�, h�1�riE��e.
�����r���r ��°��ri�r���I����r��to��Bl�sfc�rr����c���
rrip pl��r�ir�� t��ibil� ����iir�t�t��
_ ��II ��nte�r anc� tr�n�it c�r��en c���r� r��=�� kc� �r�irr�a�� r���r�tin� hc��.ir�
��I! ��nt�r r����is ��i�itic����l I�n�� �r �t�f��r�. �I�c�c�e� ��� c��t�r� E�u�y �r �a�s����� �� g��
tl�r��,��1�.
_ ��II ��nt�r �t�ff r����� ��ei��� �uv�ren��s t�f vsri���r� b���€�� �ns� �r�i��a� �r� �vl��r� t�7�y �r�
��sr���ir�c� ��t��r�r� sch�:�lul�.
R�d�r ���r�� r���;�) C� �+�r�t�r��� �� �c�r�c� �� t��� ��rvi�,� i�; I��hin�9 ��I��dul�.
- �r�v��d� t��i ri��r ����E���.
- ��E���I r��rth -- ��uCl� wiE�d�����r��.
- 1�€�d r��frc�c�rr�� �r��i ,r��t�r� fc���r�t�ir;�.
-��-
�CJf'�C�a��>fC�f� �C�
- ��,���r cc���r��sura��;�ti�n ��iw��:�� ��AF��� �at�� L��Ti\ w��et� C�6��T i� �LL�.�rr�r�ie�c� I��t��.
- 1itl�F� ca�� t� ��ns �r�� hi�4>��.
r �ik� lid.� �r7c� �cJc��ticar��l �icy��l� �rr���r�t6�� �t tfry�� �t�tic�rr.
� Th� tr�iE�� �re pr��iCic�n�c� ir�� tf�F� r��E��l� c�f �i�c3 ��1�ti�e�rr� a��i ����I�: 6��v� �� �al� �li th� !�t�y
�r�w�r�� th� e��rci� �� th� ��I�tfc�rrr�.
- ��he�lufe ����alic �n��tin�� �� t�r�� univ�r�iii�s.
- �4�Ic� r�c;yeling r�����i�ci�� t� �r�r��it c������r �an� �t�tiz��rj�.
_ �'e�c� rn�ny hc�rr7�l��� ic�it�r �rc��e�sc� t.he k�-�r���� c�r�ter.
m H�i�di��� ��r��� ���i�t t���tt�r�� a� C��a��.
�����ir� ��h"r����
_ �il�� t�r� n��t�l��� c�f e��rr�rrt F�[���.
- ��i��i��l �xc�te��r�t fi�r i��� +��h��cl��.
������f��c�ari��
� ��;c�pC� dr��°� th����tgh� th� ts��� I��n� �t f�����l�r�c9 Vill���/I��utirisvill� ���� �t�ti��i.
. �ett�r ���s�eri��r pi�k��aE�/�9r�a� �ff ��c������ �a� Hic�l�l�n� `�il����11_�v�i��rill� Lak� .����i�rr,
_ �7i�fic��ity turn�r�c� c��� �� F�i�hl�nc�'�ili��cl��wi�vill� ��k� �f�ti�r�.'+/issk�i�ity ca� c�n��c�n�in� c���s
i� ��ffic�alt.
_ f��i�A �h�uld ali�e+r.r ��� c-�vcr�f�ht ����inc� fc�� �i�a�in�s� �rips �nd �c� tl�at �ass�r7r�er� ca��
c;r�rnpl�t� th� I��� ��ctf�r�� af tr�ei6� tro�.
- 1�i�y�ide h�rr� �t ��c��� F�aint.
_ ��f��y �t ��gl� h csi��� �;rca��ii��.
- Fi����6� th� tr�fFic I�c�f�� �E ��Ic�r�c#ca.
F�r� �d��B���� ��1��
- 4�f�r7t it� l�� �I�I� t� I���y ������� firc�M�r� i�C��.A �v�i� �f rny �r°��I�yer is i� C��II�s ��ui�t�,
a TI�e ��rr�r�t r�;g�c�r��i f�te ��r�er��ent ���s r��t ���t� ��a k�� f�i� tc� L7C�T�.
- I�ART bu��� �in� r���t �cc��atir�g ��TA f�ar��.
- �ffer f�r� vc��,�ci°��rs fc�r sc�c;i�l ��rvic� a��r�����.
� �fi�r w��k�r�d ���ni6y ������.
��h�� ��r���� �r���
��r���� tr� �e�rt V11�r�F�
- ��r��t cc�r�r���ii�rr i� TF�� �rfGhc��a� I��vi«� t� tr�r�sf�r to t�r��rT� Lin�.
� ��i�, ��rv��� tt� ��altl� ��rvic�� c�f i�+�rth i�x�� in ����t��.
-� P��� s�rv�ce t� ��v� �i�°��Ic��.;rr���rt r����� [Jr�ic,c�rr� L�k�.
- �t�iic�r� ir� �ake �iti��.
� ��rrr���tir�ro �� �rr�tr�k.
_ �����€i�r ��r�v�ic� G��k tc� L€�v�i�;viil� ��c�i��r �a��t�r.
-�s-
y � f- � � ' �` , I ' ( �� � .
}w� iU, Ai �V
3���; ��' �
__ _
. _
���ii�1� UV�F1�G7�Y T�T�L �F�I(�A�t 1`�i�L �Ai`�I���"�
ViIEEI«F �i��I��R'Y �t���,�iF�l� F��I�AY �AS�/��i19� �'/q1�R�` ��,��R��Y �A���/`f�klP �'r'b11�1�*
J"'��.0 ., C11{3� ��F .... 15.3_.___ L3 ���/C3 JL}C} _____. _ JJ 1�„°iC3Id
�°�y (°� - .,... y q —____ { ...._ �ry_�7 _-
1..V 1.��.4 ���, �3tt� �'CJ �� ..... �,J �41��(i �l.J'� �� 11�tr�0
_ j` � �... ry qy /
1 f`Ll�� ''�, CJk..!'.l.J� �-� .... .diJ�� 6L1 �����FS� 1.11/� L}�. 1.�C>�!� .
,?�} _....�7�..�- �ry� .... ry �'y ('� ^7 [�/� p { ry /
..__/__... — ..
�. ...
6.�}�'��� p(,�� � �'„F '-�tK"J .L4J �JJ!(J .Ltl`4�J �� 1Y�4I1?
..��.� .� .. ___ . ..u.�..,...
�1-�rt i.l{)� 3� 4�3 1f� 3C��, �47 3� �3��°,f�
7 P��sv ���� 2� — 4"I � 31�/� 79� 4<i 1��%,
__ _ m.__. ��... �
14-�ca�r i 1���3 ?��� E`�t� � 7I��'� �3� �i _ �.��`%�
�...�_ _ -- - •
�l-�tcsv 4t71� 1f� �1 �S �4% 5J7 �.P �`��I%5
_ � _ _..._.�: ___mm________. . —
2� (�dCtu Ca�`�(7�3 �al 113 �� 72°/n �33 [.� ��"'i�
.�
�} (..'} -ry �»""_�.n._ . - _-- �y('� k .�.... ' 7 ... _ ....�y�.j..�.��.,,»..�, ....,. {
�'°l1��.. ���1.��J �! �L �� '-64I�b ...3�1 1C) LJ���C}
_...
�� ��.'G ��i�� ��3 �� �r ����i �{�� � % �t�r'�a
�.���7�t: �`t'3�� �.�5` �i �� l�aflo ���t �i q�il�n
2�-(��� 2�3�1 -- �� �� � ��%a �;85 -- �3 �4t�"l�
_�.�.fm... p �} -7fa _ ry �q `'�9 'pry q/'� �
G_JC�� �`i-�:J� ��� ' .L°i �B �.`-F�iQ �/1 �7L .._. . t.11��fC} ,.
i
._...� ...... �,,.,�... -""---- - - -
�-.�clll ,�'.3��� �� �� % �`C?'°✓a� '�A.�.�_. �,� 1.�.�'�b°�)
, . �� � - --,�-'�°'.� ....
��i-i�3f1 ���Q �� �% � ��°,�a ��i� �f �}�°fii
� ___,.. ��..........._ _ _. �..
��-'.�c'3[`I ��..�� .�?� � �.� �"�" �.��/t� %�� �� ��.�S�fi
„_.�...... ... ��.... . _. _.— �.�. � ._. _.-----
�{� J�n 69`�6 32 5� IC ���rE, 49;' 2:� 871�
_- - .�... .. � ....
�-��� ���� �z �:� �� �r���� ��� z� �or�
1����k� . G�i7 3l fCl 1� 38`l� �44 �� �i2%
p�}__ w_.��g{y �... '7 _..[ry ry(y �yry �{p g ---- �5
�L..l3`��� � ��.� � f GJS .J,�, �.`i .L4J 3L��9 '-f 3..J.. �� �H�I�O
[q/�'p ,,�_.�. -. . _ �w„ ..... � � _.. ._ - (�
L ! � �; � ��.. � 11 lJ Ci � f�.,. � b. �. U' ..) � /!� � G.] d J G3 A. ..k. 7 €�O
�-14��r 115C7 3� �7 � �l S�`%'� ��� l� �4°1,
. _. ._ -
l�-6��� , ���� ?� �� l� �(ll, ���i �C� �.�l�l,
. _r.. _
��-�tl�r .�'2t�5 33 41 � 25°� 5�0 33 1�Q�fi�
ry�� ''p_°��.'.t._.. ^�ry }�g / ^ ) (�,
��-9VIr�',r lG..V��� �� �� 13 �?"�pd�4 '-P�.�A __ �,`t ��fl�G
��1�/�t-W��kc��y Ft�c:iership
-79-
�
�
�
� � ����a � ��� � '
��� �� �� ����� � ���f�
�
� � � �
� � ��� ���� ���� ������ �¢ ��� �
���
�
�
0
�
� �������j � �� ����$ ���
� ��� � ������ � � �� �
� �� �������� ����� ��� ����
— � ������ ������� ��¢��� ��� �������'�
� �� ����� ���� �S e�S ��� �`����
�
� �
� � ������ �� � �� �� �� ��,� �
��
� �� � � �
� �� ����� � �� ��� ���
� �������� ������� �� �
� �� � ����� ���.��� ��� �
� ����`����� ����� �� ��� ��
������ �� �� ��� � �����
� ��������� ��� ����� ������������
������ ��������.
� �� ���� e ������ ����������i� ������
��������. ���� �� ����s� ���
��� ���� �� n������� ���������
�r��k�.
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: May 8, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
�,
�;;
ACM: Fred Greene
SUBJECT
Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the request to name the Rail
Trail pedestrian bridge over Loop 288.
BACKGROUND
At the May 1, 2012 Council meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Kamp aslced for a staff update on the status
of a request from former Council Member Charlye Heggins to name the 900 linear foot Denton
Branch Rail Trail pedestrian bridge the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Bridge. The contract to
constnict the bridge has been placed on the May 15, 2012 consent agenda for Council approval. If
approved, constniction on the bridge is expected to begin late June 2012.
PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions)
On October 19, 2010, a Professional Services Agreement was approved with the engineering
consulting firm of Locicwood, Andrews & Newna�n, Inc. for the design and specifications for the
constniction of a Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge over Loop 288 as part of the Denton Branch Rail
Trail proj ect.
FISCAL INFORMATION
The policy states that the party requesting the naming is responsible for all costs associated with
signage unless City Council waives this requirement.
EXHIBITS
None
Respectfully submitted:
��������
Emerson Vorel, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: May 8, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Planning & Development
ACM: Fred Greene <��'
SUBJECT — SI12-0005 —Denton's Gccs Well Tccsk Force ccnd Gccs Well Inspections Division IJpdccte
Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding activities relating to the
City's Gas Well Inspections Division; Phase II amendments relative to the City's drilling and
production regtilations; and the enacted gas well moratorium.
BACKGROUND
Gas Well Task Force
On January 31, 2012, the staff updated City Council regarding the malce-up, status, and progress
of the Gas Well Taslc Force. Since that time, the Taslc Force held eight (8) additional weeldy
meetings to continue discussing the identified Focus Area topics. Meeting minutes,
presentations, comment cards, and additional resources are all currently posted on the City's
website at: http://www.cityofdenton.com/gaswellinspections. The Task Force meetings served
as a means to further engage the citizens of Denton regarding the pending Phase II updates to the
City's drilling and production regulations.
In addition to the Task Force meetings, the University of North Texas' Department of
Philosophy and Religion Studies Professor, Dr. Adam Briggle, and the Denton Stalceholders
Drilling Advisory Group (DAG) also held a series of gas drilling related meetings. Via panel
discussions, DAG presented pertinent drilling and production information to the public. The
DAG process assisted the City by serving as an additional fonim for capturing public input that
will greatly contribute to the Phase II revisions. City Staff inet with Dr. Briggle on November
10, 2011 to share and discuss information and core principles that should be considered during
the Phase II draft. Public input received via comment cards and verbalized comments during the
multiple Taslc Force meetings, written statements, technical publications, industry participation,
and research papers were also used by staff to draft revised ordinance langtiage.
City staff is currently in the drafting, editing, and revising stage of the Phase II ordinance
amendments. The final Task Force meeting to discuss the Focus Area topics concluded on
Monday, March 26, 2012. After that meeting, staff accepted the taslc of drafting the ordinance
amendments to capture the Task Force's recommendations, comments provided by Denton's
citizenry, state and federal governmental policies, and City staff's lcnowledge and research
findings in accordance with City Council's previous leadership and direction.
The next stage of the Phase II ordinance amendment process will be to generate a draft that can
be sent for review by the legal and scientific advisory members of the Taslc Force. The legal and
scientific advisory members will review the draft ordinance and offer suggested language
changes to ensure the proposed ordinance draft maximizes acceptable technical and scientific
standards, could pass legal challenges, and was drafted in accordance with current state and
federal niles, laws, and regtilations. The timing of review by the outside legal and scientific
advisory members is anticipated to talce approximately three to four (3-4) weelcs. If the legal and
scientific reviews produce additional langtiage changes, City staff will once again meet to
incorporate those suggestions into a draft that will be presented to the voting members of the
Taslc Force.
The Taslc Force will hold another public meeting to review the draft generated by staff and
scnitinized by the outside legal and scientific advisory members. This meeting will provide City
staff with an opportunity to present the draft ordinance to the voting Task Force members and
describe the processes used during each stage of the Phase II ordinance amendment process.
This upcoming meeting will once again be scheduled in the City Council Chamber and open to
the public. Advertisement and announcements of the final Task Force meeting will be conducted
in advance of the meeting to ensure attendance and participation by both the public and voting
Task Force members. Some langtiage revisions reviewed by the Task Force during this meeting
may not capture the anticipated draft langtiage of each member. To provide City Council with
multiple options for revision, Taslc Force members will be encouraged to provide substitute
recommendations to address the issue. The proposed draft ordinance, along with any substitute
Taslc Force recommendations, will then be scheduled for public hearings by the Planning and
Zoning commission and City Council to review, amend, and/or approve the Phase II
amendments.
Gas Well Inspections Division Update
The Gas Well Inspections (GW� Division inspects each Drilling and/or Production Site and
every well under the City's jurisdiction. The GWI Division currently maintains records for 267
producing, drilled, or permitted wells within the corporate city limits (COD), and 188 wells
within the Division 1 area of Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). The GWI Division is
currently worlcing with Technology Services to create an interactive web-based mapping system
for each Drilling and/or Production Site and every well. The map will be available online once
the system is developed. Frequent updates to the map will be performed by the GWI Division to
ensure the public map viewer provides the most up-to-date information to the general public.
In 2011, the City began the annual inspection program to ensure on-site physical inspections of
each Drilling and/or Production site and administrative reviews of each well are performed at a
minimum of twice per year. This annual program helps the GWI Division maintain accurate
records of each facility and provides the means to field verify well status and condition, site
layout, and regulatory compliance.
The annual inspection fee amount was established at $850 for wells within COD, and $580 for
wells within the Division I ETJ. The City billed operators half of the respective fee amounts per
well in 2011 since the City only had the capability to conduct one of the two annual inspections.
In addition to the reduced fee, additional wells were voided due to multiple factors such as
plugged wells, wells permitted and not drilled, or permitted dry holes. The City mailed invoices
totaling $175,750, voided $27,105 worth of fees, and collected $148,645. The collection
percentage, accounting for voided invoices, equated to a one-hundred (100) percent collection
rate.
In Febniary 2012, the City mailed the 2012 invoices to the respective operators. The 2012
original invoiced total was $336,260. Additional invoices totaling $123,760 were sent to various
operators to account for corrected and voided invoices. The voided amount is currently
$132,530. As of May 3, 2012, the amount remitted was $279,190, which equates to an
approximate eighty five (85) percent collection rate. The outstanding balance of $48,300
remains unremitted. The majority of the outstanding balance, $44,550, is carried by one
operator, Eagleridge Operating. If Eagleridge submitted full payment, the 2012 collection rate
would increase to approximately ninety nine (99) percent. The increase in voids froin 2011 to
2012 was mainly the result of removing six (6) permitted Devon wells that were not drilled as of
the original invoice date. To correct the six (6) wells, Devon's entire invoiced amount,
$102,540, was voided and re-invoiced at the corrected total of $97,980. Devon's corrected
invoice accounts for approximately seventy eight (78) percent of the total voided in 2012. The
GWI Division is worlcing with the respective operators to account for the outstanding balance.
The GWI Division commenced the City's inspection program in April 2011. From April to
June, the Division performed well identification inspections to field verify the RRC data.
Beginning in July 2011, inspectors performed compliance checics of each Drilling and/or
Production Site. In 2011, the GWI Division performed 1,592 inspections and issued 2,344
notices of violation. The Division's webpage includes the attached 2011 inspection summary.
In addition, the monthly inspection results for January, Febniary, and March are also available
online and included in the exhibits. The GWI Division performed 296 total inspections in
January, 224 in Febniary, 331 in March, and 299 in April.
Gas Well Moratorium
On Febniary 7, 2012, the City Council approved Ordinance 2012-024, which imposed a
moratorium on the receipt, processing and approval of applications for oil and gas well permits
that would authorize Mineral Activities within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, and
any applications for specific use permits, site plans, development plans and plats of any nature or
type, pursuant to the Denton Development Code as they relate to Mineral Activities, or any part
thereof, in the City of Denton. The purpose of the moratorium is to maintain the stat�is quo
within the corporate limits of the City.
Per the aforementioned ordinance, the moratorium shall remain in full force and effect upon its
passage and for a period not to exceed 120 days, unless terminated prior to that time by action of
the City Council. During the moratoriuin, City staff was directed to complete those studies and
analyses necessary to determine what, if any, regulatory changes to the ordinances of the City of
Denton are reasonable and necessary to permit the Mineral Activities without disproportionately
impacting the interest of surface estate owners and citizens within the City.
One objective of the moratoriuin was to afford time for the City staff to complete their worlc and
malce their recommendations to the City Council within one hundred twenty (120) days. If staff
determined the one hundred twenty (120) day time period was not feasible, they were directed to
report bacic to the City Council with a proposed calendar in which they will complete their worlc.
This agenda item provides the opportunity to report bacic to City Council with a proposed
calendar.
CONCLUSION
Staff is actively involved in drafting, editing, and revising the Phase II ordinance amendments.
The final Gas Well Taslc Force meeting to discuss the Focus Area topics concluded on March 26,
2012. The next steps in the Phase II process will enable staff to worlc with the outside legal and
scientific Taslc Force advisory members to devise a draft ordinance that will be presented to the
voting Taslc Force members during an upcoming public meeting. The proposed draft ordinance
will then be scheduled for public hearings by the Planning and Zoning commission and City
Council to review, amend, and/or approve the Phase II amendments. In addition, the GWI
Division will continue inspecting the drilling and production facilities located within the City's
jurisdiction. The accepting and processing of oil and gas well applications will continue in
accordance with the adopted moratorium as long as it remains in effect.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1— Gas Well Task Force Voting Summary
Exhibit 2— 2011 Annual Inspection Invoice Summary
Exhibit 3— 2012 Annual Inspection Invoice Summary
Exhibit 4— GWI Division 2011 Inspection Summary
Exhibit 5— January 2012 Inspection Summary
Exhibit 6— Febniary 2012 Inspection Summary
Exhibit 7— March 2012 Inspection Summary
Exhibit 8— April 2012 Inspection Summary
Exhibit 9 — PowerPoint Presentation
Prepa�ed by:
��
Ma�lc A. Cunningham, AICP, CPM
Planning and Development Depa�tment Director
Respectfully submitted:
Fred Greene, Assistant City Manager
Exhibit 1
ACTION ITEM VOTING RESULTS
5 Voting members: Don Butler (DB), John Siegmund (JS), Vicki Oppenheim (VO), Tom La Point (TL), and Ed Ireland (EI)
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 1
AIR QUALITY
(1-9-12 and 1-23-12 meetings � 17 Items)
1. No electricity generation on-site
a. Approved, 4-1 vote (AYE - DB, JS, VO, and TL � NAY - EI)
2. Vapor recovery units
a. Approved, 5-0 vote
3. Green completions
a. Approved, 3-2 vote (AYE - DB, VO, and TL � NAY - JS and EI)
4. Best practices for gas drilling and production
a. Approved, 5-0 vote
5. Air monitoring as a compliance tool through a monitoring program
a. Approved, 5-0 vote
6. Reference other applicable local, state, and federal rules, laws, and
regulations
a. Approved, 5-0 vote
7. Incorporate compliance timetables
a. Approved, 5-0 vote
8. Appropriate valves and fittings, plus pipeline pressure monitoring and
shut-off valves
a. Motion to include under °Best practices for gas drilling and production"
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
9. Regulate compressor stations, collection stations, or tank farms in City
a. Motion to not follow DAG's recommendation as originally presented -°No
compressor stations, collection stations, or tank farms in City"
b. Approved: 4-1 vote (AYE - DB, JS, TL, and EI � NAY - VO)
c. Second vote with modified language, as written
d. Approved: 5-0 vote
10. Air quality analysis and monitoring
a. Motion to include under °Air monitoring as a compliance tool through a
monitoring program"
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
Page 1 of 13
Exhibit 1
11. Outfit City staff with necessary equipment to carry out Task Force goals
and ensure they are trained properly to utilize the equipment
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
12. Proper actions for regulatory infractions regarding emissions
a. Motion to include under °Reference other applicable local, state, and federal
rules, laws, and regulations"
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
13. Consider requiring operators to submit evidence of compliance with state
and federal air permitting regulations, upon request
a. DB motioned to combine the presented °Baseline analysis for air" and
°Summarize impact pathways" AIs.
b. VO seconded; motion presented for vote
c. Approved: 5-0 vote
14. EIAs for each site, plus TIAs required and Ongoing air quality monitoring
a. Motion to take no action
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
15. Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) recommended emission reduction
measures
a. Motion to include under °Best practices for gas drilling and production"
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
16. Updates to ordinance document
a. Motion to include under °Reference other applicable local, state, and federal
rules, laws, and regulations"
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
17. Best available technology, monitor VOC emissions, fewer drill sites in City
and ET7, pipeline pressure monitoring and shut-off valves, vapor recovery
units, and eliminate flaring
a. Motion to move past all six action items
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 2
WATER
(1-30-12 and 2-6-12 meetings � 17 Items)
1. Require closed-loop systems in the City and ET7.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
Page 2 of 13
Exhibit 1
2. Used drilling fluids should be temporarily stored and reused for drilling,
when possible. Surplus uncontaminated drilling mud may be applied to
surface of agricultural land which is not subject to run-off.
b. Motion to include items with closed-loop recommendation
c. Approved: 4-1 vote (AYE - JS, VO, TL, and EI � NAY - DB)
3. No saltwater disposal wells allowed in the City or its ET7.
d. Approved: 4-1 vote (AYE - DB, JS, VO, and TL � NAY - EI)
4. Expand best management practice requirements to minimize sediment
runoff.
e. Approved: 4-1 vote (AYE - DB, JS, VO, and TL � NAY - EI)
5. Use existing Action Item language for similar newly proposed actions.
f. Approved: 5-0 vote
6. The City gas well inspector, or his representative, should be given joint
inspection/enforcement jurisdiction over existing and future City water
quality ordinances, that are under the purview of other City Departments
or inspectors.
g. Approved: 5-0 vote
7. Require operators to submit private water well testing results of those
wells within a 1,500-foot radius for property owners who agree to the
tests and that the costs shall be borne by operator and testing conducted
by independent, certified third party.
h. Approved: 5-0 vote
8. Require proximity maps to surface waters and surface drainage
assessments with the emergency response plan.
i. Approved: 3-1-1 vote (AYE - DB, VO, and TL � NAY - EI � Abstain - JS)
9. Require operators to provide verification that site personnel are trained in
and in compliance with the submitted emergency response plan.
j. Approved: 5-0 vote
10. Investigate additional casing monitoring inspections and regulate findings
accordingly.
k. Failed: 2-3 vote (AYE - VO and TL � NAY - DB, JS, and EI)
11. Establish a methane monitoring program as well as isotope testing and
regulate accordingly.
I. Failed; no second to approval motion
12. Require water recycling technologies, where applicable.
m. Approved: 5-0 vote
13. Postpone possible action regarding setting water use limits until after the
City Council vote on the water plan.
n. Motioned to postpone
o. Approved: 5-0 vote
Page 3 of 13
Exhibit 1
14. Update water quality and quantity standards as best practices and laws
change.
p. Motion to include with previously approved Action Item
q. Approved: 5-0 vote
15. Provide the City information on impact pathways for water quality on at
each site and the practices and measures that will be implemented to
address these impacts.
r. Motion to include with previously approved Action Item
s. Approved: 5-0 vote
16. The operator must disclose how much water it will require, what source of
water it plans to use, and options for reducing water use.
t. Motion to include with previously approved Action Item
u. Approved: 5-0 vote
17. The operator must use municipal water and no municipal water may be
transported to any pad site not specified in the plan. No municipal water
may be transported outside of Denton and its ET7.
v. Motion to not forward as a recommendation
w. Approved: 5-0 vote
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 3
COMPLIANCE/INSPECTION FOLLOW-UP
(2-13-12 meeting � 9 Items)
1. Establish procedures and a timeline for bringing unpermitted/platted
wells and related facilities into compliance based on legal review.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
2. Operator shall provide testing data as required by the City of Denton.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
3. Motion to combine three Action Items to state: Establish reasonable time
period for operators to respond to City after receiving notice of violations
from the City and clarify enforcement penalties for non compliance.
a. Action Item Number 1: If a gas well does not meet City standards for location
or other issues, what happens to well?
b. Action Item Number 2: Establish reasonable time period for operators to
respond to City after receiving notice of violations from the City.
c. Action Item Number 3: Establish deadlines for correcting violations for
different types of violations (depending on type, threat to public safety,
seriousness, and threshold level).
d. Approved: 5-0 vote
Page 4 of 13
Exhibit 1
4. Motion to combine two Action Items to state: the City will investigate
trigger mechanisms for compliance modifications.
a. Action Item Number 1: Establish trigger mechanisms that require non-
conforming gas wells to upgrade to conformance based upon current
ordinance. These mechanisms may be based upon the types of changes made
to a facility or by percentage.
b. Action Item Number 2: Establish trigger mechanisms for requiring upgrades
to existing conforming gas wells.
c. Approved: 5-0 vote
5. Disclose inspection results to residents and public on City website either in
list or on map; possibly establish a report card system.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
6. Require plan on how operator will respond to violation and the time
period.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
7. From DAG Report - Take the recommendations of the Task Force and see if
DDC Sections 35.1.10.4 and 35.22 could be revised to be specifically
tailored as applicable to gas drilling and production.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
8. Revise code by inserting a paragraph that acknowledges Denton's
appreciation of the benefits of gas production.
a. Motioned to not consider the proposed Action Item at this time
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
9. Delete the portion of the ordinance that state shall be screened by 8' high
or other opaque decorative masonry wall.
a. Motion to include with On-Site Requirements Focus Area
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 4
OTHER GAS DRILLING RELATED FACILITIES
(2-20-12 meeting � 9 Items)
1. Encourage the City review the pipeline ordinances from The Town Flower
Mound and Grand Prairie for applicability, to the City of Denton in regards
to public health safety and welfare.
a. Approved: 4-1 vote (AYE - JS, VO, TL, and EI � NAY - DB)
2. Require enhanced emergency preparation for City departments and
coordination with pipeline companies, as well as emergency drills.
a. Motion to move past the item
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
Page 5 of 13
Exhibit 1
3. Require GIS as built drawings for flow lines and gathering lines and others
related to Gas Drilling Facilities that are permitted by the City.
a. Failed: 2-3 vote (AYE - VO and TL � NAY - DB, JS, and EI)
4. Require soundproof enclosures for all compressor stations (later clarified
to mean all compressors).
a. Motion to postpone noise discussions until the On-Site Requirements Focus
Area
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
5. Restrict compressor stations to industrial and/or exclusively commercial
zoning districts and require enhanced setbacks from residential districts.
a. Action Number 1: Motion to move this Action Item to the On-Site
Requirements Focus Area; failed without second
b. Action Number 2: Motion to move past this proposed Action Item
c. Action Number 2: Approved: 5-0 vote
6. Require reporting to the City on equipment testing and maintenance
programs for these facilities.
a. Action Number 1: Motion to include this Action Item with previously approved
Action Items and not consider individually
b. Action Number 1: Failed: 2-3 vote (AYE - VO and TL � NAY - DB, JS, and EI)
c. Action Number 2: Motion to move past this proposed Action Item
d. Action Number 2: Approved: 5-0 vote
7. Require BTEX units on all dehydration systems.
a. Failed: 2-3 vote (AYE - VO and TL � NAY - DB, JS, and EI)
8. Review requirements in Flower Mound and other cities with enhanced
requirements for compressor station locations.
a. Motion to move past proposed Action Item
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
9. Enhanced review of gas storage facilities.
a. Motion to move past proposed Action Item
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 5
INSURANCE AND BONDING
(2-27-12 meeting � 2 Items)
1. The amount of the security instrument (irrevocable letter of credit or
payment bond) should be increased to $100,000 for a single well and
$200,000 for multiple wells on the same pad site.
a. Proposal credited to the DAG group
b. Motion to postpone
c. Approved: 5-0 vote
Page 6 of 13
Exhibit 1
2. Require all items for discussion and vote must be presented and explained
by a Task Force member.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 6
PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS
(2-27-12 meeting � 5 Items)
1. Require operators to meet with the public prior to the Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting for any SUP applications. Require notification (via
regular U.S. mail) to residents, property owners, and businesses within
1500 feet.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
2. Require notification to surrounding neighborhood of any re-fracing
activities. Require notification via regular us mail to residents, property,
owners, and businesses within 1500 ft.
a. Failed: 2-3 vote (AYE - VO and TL � NAY - DB, JS, and EI)
3. Require operators to notify surrounding neighborhood for any new drilling
activity or gas related facility, even if only requiring a gas drilling
development plat or site plan. Require notification (via regular U.S. mail)
to residents, property owners, and businesses within 1500 feet.
a. Approved: 4-1 vote (AYE - DB, VO, TL, and EI � NAY - JS)
4. The City shall hold at least two public meetings, advertised in local media
and paid for by the operator, for purposes of answering citizen questions
prior to the solicitation of signatures on gas lease documents.
a. Motioned to not take action on this item
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
5. Request that City hold candid public meeting by senior City staff, council
member, and/or mayor to outline for Denton citizens the positive benefits
and negative problems experienced to date resulting from gas well
operations in the City of Denton and the ET7.
a. Motion that staff prepare an annual report summarizing Denton's gas drilling
h i sto ry
b. Approved: 5-0 vote
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 7
LEASE PROCESS AND PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS
(3-5-12 meeting � 1 Items)
1. No Action Items presented for this Focus Area.
Page 7 of 13
Exhibit 1
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 8
ON-SITE REQUIREMENTS
(3-5-12, 3-12-12, and 3-19-12 meetings � 13 Items)
1. Evaluate current gate and security requirements for gas drilling and
production sites.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
2. Evaluate creating maximum levels for low frequency outdoor noise levels
at building walls of protective uses, possibly at 65db, and equipment that
would be needed and testing procedures.
a. Approved: 3-2 vote (AYE - JS, VO, and TL � NAY - DB and EI)
3. Require an ambient noise study for every site and a noise mitigation plan
demonstrating compliance with the study site, but allow for 3 dB
nighttime exceedances and 5 dB daytime exceedances over ambient when
measured 300 feet from the boundary of the gas well drilling or production
site or 100 feet closer than the nearest receptor.
a. Failed: 2-3 vote (AYE - VO and TL � NAY - DB, JS, and EI)
4. Evaluate requirements for a reclamation plan at the time of application
and incorporate future requirements and identify the current condition.
This action combined two proposed Action Items into one recommendation.
a. Two Proposed Action Items:
1) Require a Surface Reclamation Plan for all gas drilling and productior
sites. The Surface Reclamation Plan shall include:
i. Proposed stages and projected timing of operations, including
phasing of drilling and production operations, and phasing if
more than one pad site on subject property;
ii. The proposed stages of reclamation, including a reclamation
plan illustrating and outlining the stages;
iii. Elements in reference to the City of Fort Worth ordinance; and
iv. The plan shall also reference all other site closure requirements
at the State and Federal level. The State and Federal plans
shall be provided to the City at each stage of reclamation.
2) When an Operator decides to abandon a gas well and associated
facility, a Reclamation Plan must be approved by the proper
authorities of the City of Denton. The Reclamation Plan must include
all State and Federal requirements in effect at that time as well as
specific additional requirements imposed by the City of Denton at
that time to accommodate specific situations related to the well and
facility to be abandoned. If a Salvage Company is owner of the
facility at the time of abandonment, identical requirements remain in
effect excepting that the required insurance coverage is reduced to
$10 million. Any well casing remaining in place after abandonment
shall be cut and removed to a depth of at least five feet below
surface.
b. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
Page 8 of 13
Exhibit 1
5. Require screening at all gas well production sites, in accordance with DDC
Section 35.13. This action combined three proposed Action Items into one
recommendation.
a. Three Proposed Action Items:
1) Require screening walls at all gas drilling and production sites in the
City.
2) Require landscape screening buffers at all gas drilling and production
sites.
i. The landscape screening buffer of 30 feet shall be installed
within 30 days of spudding of the first gas well or within 30
days of the gas-related facility being installed. There may be an
exception to this time period if the plantings would occur during
the extreme heat of summer months, and as determined by the
Director of Planning.
ii. The landscape screening buffer of 30 feet shall be a
combination of evergreen and deciduous trees and bushes from
the approved plant list.
iii. The trees and bushes must be planted according to current
landscaping standards in the Denton Development Code.
Some of these screening requirements may be installed along
the right-of-way of the pad site property instead of immediately
around the pad site. The street buffer may be reduced to 10
feet. This determination will be done on a case-by-case basis,
as deemed appropriate by the Director of Planning in evaluating
current right-of-way conditions and site characteristics.
3) Remove the current Ordinance requirement that wellheads and
related equipment be screened with an 8-foot opaque masonry wall
and substitute the requirement that the facilities be enclosed with
good quality rust protected chain link or metal stake fencing of 8-
foot height that permits sight of the enclosed equipment. Such
transparency is important for effective monitoring of activities inside
the enclosed area. Landscape screening should not be permitted for
the same reason as well as the fact that such landscape plantings
will require significant water resources at a time of water
conservation. In addition, the surface where such landscaping would
be located is private property.
b. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
6. The operator shall paint and maintain all production equipment at all
times, including wellheads, pumping units, tanks, and buildings or
structures. When requiring painting of such facilities, the director of
planning and development services shall consider the deterioration of the
quality of the material of which such facility or structure is constructed,
the degree of rust, and its appearance.
a. Motion to move past item
b. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
7. Require operators to bring drilling and production sites up to current
equipment and operational standards when re-fracturing a well.
a. Motion to move past item
b. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
Page 9 of 13
Exhibit 1
8. Require operators to hire third-party companies to conduct baseline soil
testing of gas drilling and production sites. If there are any spills or
contamination on-site, require the operator to conduct follow-up soil
testing at gas drilling and production sites and provide these test results
to the City of Denton. The operator must provide post-drilling testing
results as well after abandonment.
a. Motion to move past item
b. Approved: 4-1 vote (NAY - VO)
9. Require a maintenance plan for hatch seals of storage tanks. The plan
must be provided to the City of Denton as well as yearly maintenance
reports.
a. Motion to consider hatch seal maintenance already included under previously
approved Action Items, as applicable
b. Failed: 2-3 vote (AYE - VO and TL � NAY - DB, JS, and EI)
10. Look into requirements to prevent pooling water and mud on driving
surfaces on-site.
a. Approved: 3-2 vote (AYE - JS, VO, and TL � NAY - DB and EI)
11. Review DDC Section 35.22.5.A.2.K to make sure it is adequate to keep mud
and rocks off public roads and Rights-of-Way.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
12. Review and clarify the definition of a lightening arrestor system.
a. Approved: 5-0 vote
13. As a policy recommendation to the City, review and discuss the
appropriate location of the ET7 Division I/II boundary line both internally
and with Denton County.
a. Failed: 2-3 vote (AYE - VO and TL � NAY - DB, JS, and EI)
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 9
CITY INFRASTRUCTURE
(3-26-12 meeting � 4 Items)
1. Require review fee schedule and road damage remediation agreement, as
appropriate.
a. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
2. Review the City's Drought Plan and provide recommendations on gas
drilling and production operators' water use during the different stages of
the plan.
a. Motion to move past item
b. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
Page 10 of 13
Exhibit 1
3. Request operators utilize surface waters from private lakes and ponds to
the extent feasible for drilling and frac water especially during periods of
Denton water-use restrictions.
a. Motion to move past item
b. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
4. Within the Gas Well Drilling and Production ordinances in Subchapter 22,
the City should consider cross-referencing other City ordinances specific to
other Departments' requirements that are outside that of the current Gas
Well Drilling and Productions ordinances yet are germane to gas well
permitting, drilling, operations, abandonment, etc.
a. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
FOCUS AREA TOPIC 10
SEISMIC TESTING
(3-26-12 meeting � 2 Items)
1. Require an Oil and Gas Exploration Permit for seismic surveys.
a. Motion to review the types of seismic surveys to promote the best available
technologies and require a permit for impact based exploration.
b. Approved: 4-0 vote (DB absent)
2. Request staff to provide hard copy to each DTF member of draft of the
complete Drilling City Ordinance III prior to submission to City Council.
Following a realistic period of time for DTF members to study the draft,
schedule a DTF meeting to discuss.
c. Task Force in consensus of this item and forwarded as a recommendation
without vote
Page 11 of 13
Exhibit 1
APPROVED ACTION ITEMS
Air Quality
1. No electricity generation on-site
2. Vapor recovery units
3. Green completions
4. Best practices for gas drilling and production
5. Air monitoring as a compliance tool through a monitoring program
6. Reference other applicable local, state, and federal rules, laws, and regulations
7. Incorporate compliance timetables
8. Regulate compressor stations, collection stations, or tank farms in City
9. City staff is outfitted with necessary equipment to carry out Task Force goals and
they are trained properly to utilize the equipment
10. Consider requiring operators to submit evidence of compliance with state and
federal air permitting regulations, upon request
Water
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16
Require closed-loop systems in the City and ETJ.
No saltwater disposal wells allowed in the City or ETJ.
Expand best management practice requirements to minimize sediment runoff.
Use existing Action Item language for similar newly proposed actions.
The City gas well inspector, or his representative, should be given joint
inspection/enforcement jurisdiction over existing and future City water quality
ordinances, that are under the purview of other City Departments or inspectors.
Require operators to submit private water well testing results of those wells within
a 1,500-foot radius for property owners who agree to the tests and that the costs
shall be borne by operator and testing conducted by independent, certified third
pa rty.
17. Require proximity maps to surface waters and surface drainage assessments with
:
19.
20.
21.
the emergency response plan.
Require operators to provide verification that site personnel are trained in and in
compliance with the submitted emergency response plan.
Approve a well upgrade incentive program for drilling and production sites.
Require water recycling technologies where applicable.
Consider requiring operators to submit evidence of compliance with state and
federal permitting regulations, upon request.
Compliance/Inspection Follow-Up
22. Establish procedures and a timeline for bringing unpermitted/platted wells and
related facilities into compliance based on legal review.
23. Operator shall provide testing data as required by the City of Denton.
24. Establish reasonable time period for operators to respond to City after receiving
notice of violations from the City and clarify enforcement penalties for non
compliance.
25. The City will investigate trigger mechanisms for compliance modifications.
26. Disclose inspection results to residents and public on City website either in list or
on map; possibly establish a report card system.
27. Require plan on how operator will respond to violation and the time period.
28. Take the recommendations of the Task Force and see if DDC Sections 35.1.10.4
and 35.22 could be revised to be specifically tailored as applicable to gas drilling
and production.
Page 12 of 13
Exhibit 1
Other Gas Drilling Related Facilities
29. Encourage the City review the pipeline ordinances from The Town Flower Mound
and Grand Prairie for applicability, to the City of Denton in regards to public health
safety and welfare.
30. Require enhanced emergency preparation for City departments and coordination
with pipeline companies, as well as emergency drills.
Public Input Process
31. Require operators to meet with the public prior to the Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting for any SUP applications. Require notification (via regular
U.S. mail) to residents, property owners, and businesses within 1500 feet.
32. Require operators to notify surrounding neighborhood for any new drilling activity
or gas related facility, even if only requiring a gas drilling development plat or site
plan. Require notification (via regular U.S. mail) to residents, property owners, and
businesses within 1500 feet.
33. Staff will prepare an annual report that summarizes the history of gas drilling in
Denton.
On-Site Requirements
34. Evaluate current gate and security requirements for gas drilling and production
sites.
35. Evaluate creating maximum levels for low frequency outdoor noise levels at
building walls of protective uses, possibly at 65db, and equipment that would be
needed and testing procedures.
36. Evaluate requirements for a reclamation plan at the time of application and
incorporate future requirements and identify the current condition.
37. Require screening at all gas well production sites, in accordance with DDC Section
35.13.
38. Look into requirements to prevent pooling water and mud on driving surfaces on-
site.
39. Review DDC Section 35.22.5.A.2.K to make sure it is adequate to keep mud and
rocks off public roads and Rights-of-Way.
40. Review and clarify the definition of a lightening arrestor system.
City Infrastructure
41. Require review fee schedule and road damage remediation agreement, as
appropriate.
42. Within the Gas Well Drilling and Production ordinances in Subchapter 22, the City
should consider cross-referencing other City ordinances specific to other
Departments' requirements that are outside that of the current Gas Well Drilling
and Productions ordinances yet are germane to gas well permitting, drilling,
operations, abandonment, etc.
Seismic Testing
43. Review the types of seismic surveys to promote the best available technologies and
require a permit for impact based exploration.
44. Request staff to provide hard copy to each DTF member of draft of the complete
Drilling City Ordinance III prior to submission to City Council. Following a realistic
period of time for DTF members to study the draft, schedule a DTF meeting to
discuss.
Page 13 of 13
2243655 ADIaNS RL CORP ... 52695
2243671 ATMOS PIPELINE-TEXAS 52696
2243671 ATMOS PIPELINE-TEXAS �� � 52696
2243680 BEND PETROLEUM CORP ��� 52699
2243680 BEND PETROLEUM CORP ��� 52699
2244308 BFL,INC ��� ��� 52697
_ ..... ..... ..... . ......
2244308 BFL INC 52697
_ ..... ..... ..... . ......
2244308 BFL,INC 52698
_ ..... ..... ..... , ......
2244308 BFL,INC 52698
_ ..... ..... ..... . ......
2244308 BFL,INC 52698
2244308 BFL,INC ��� ��� 52698
2243727 BRADEN EXPLORATION, LLC �� � 52700
2243727 BRADEN EXPLORATION, LLC 52700
2243735 BRAMMER PETROLEUM INC �� � 52701
2243858 DARK HORSE OPERATING CO , LLC 53711
_ ..... ..... ..... . ......
2243874 DEVON ENERGVPRODUCTION 52693
2243874 DEVON ENERGVPRODUCTION��� 52693
2243874 DEVON ENERGVPRODUCTION 52694
2243874 DEVON ENERGVPRODUCTION��� 52694
2243891 DUNE OPERATING COMPANV �� � 52704
2243891 DUNE OPERATING COMPANV �� � 52704
22439IX3 EAGLE OIL & GAS CO . 52705
2243911 EAGLERIDGEOPERATING LLC 52707 10/7/2011
_ ..... ..... ..... . ..... . .........
2243911 EAGLERIDGEOPERATING LLC 52707 11/18/2011
_ ..... ..... ..... . ..... . .........
2243920 ENCANA OIL & GAS INC 52708 10/7/2011
_ ..... ..... ..... , ..... . .........
2243920 ENCANA OIL & GAS INC 52708 10/7/2011
_ ..... ..... ..... . ..... .........
2243920 ENCANA OIL & GAS INC 52709 ; 10/7/2011
2243920 ENCANA OIL & GAS INC 52709 10/7/2011
_ ..... ..... _ _ ..... __......
2243938 ENDEAVOR ENERGV RESOURCES 52710 10/7/2011
2243938 ENDEAVOR ENERGV RESOURCES 52710 10/7/2011
2244009 HEP OIL COMPANV 52715 10/7/2011
2244009 HEP OIL COMPANV 52715 ; 10/7/2011
_ ..... ..... ..... , ..... . .........
2244017 HILLWOOD O& G OPERATING CO 52717 10/7/2011
_ ..... ..... ..... . ..... . .........
2244017 HILLWOOD O& G OPERATING CO 52717 10/7/2011
2244017 HILLWOOD O& G OPERATING CO 52717 1/12/2012
2244017 HILLWOOD O& G OPERATING CO ; 52717 : 1/12/2012
19
106
6A5 WELLINSPEC�IONS
2011 BILLIN6
850.00 ..... ........
,550.00 ��� �����
870.00 ..... ........
425.00 ..... ........
290.00 ..... ........
� ��� 580.00�
425.00 ���.�'..
850 00 ... 425.00
2 8, 47 5.00 ..... ......
24,070 00 .... .....
1,700.00 ..... ......
425.00 ..... ......
15,72500 �� ��
290.00 ..... ......
:1 11
850.00 2 COD WEI15 �$425 EA
_ _
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
2,550.00 6 COD WEI15 �$425 EA �
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
870.00 3 ETJ-1 W ELLS �$290 EA ���
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES__
425.00 1 COD WELL �$425 EA _
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
290.00 1 ETJ-1 W ELL @$290 EA ���
2011 6A5 WELLINSPEC(REVISED)��
580.00 2 ETJ-1 W ELL �$290 EA ���
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES �
425.00 1 COD WELL �$425 EA
_
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
2,030.00 7 ETJ-1 W ELLS �$290 EA ���
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES �
580.00 2 ETJ-1 W ELLS �$290 EA ���
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES �
425.00 850.00 1CODWELL�$425.00 SCRU665
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES �
28,475.00 67 COD W ELLS �$425 EA ���
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
24,070.00 83 ETJ-1 WELLS �$290 EA �
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES__
1,700.00 4 COD WELL �$425 EA
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
._.. ..... __
425.00 1 COD WELL �$425 EA
15,725.00 37 COD W ELLS �$425 EA
..... .._ ____
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
._.. ..... ____
290.00 1 ET11 WELL@ $290.EA ......
2,975.00 7-CODWELSTRANFERREDFROMTRIO
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES � �� �� �
14,450.00 1,275.00 37 COD W ELLS �$425 EA ���
_
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
1,160.00 4 ET1..1 W ELLS @$290 EA ......
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
7,225.00 17 COD W ELLS �$425 EA ���
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES __. _.
2,550.00 850.00 8 COD WEI15 �$425 EA
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES �
5,950.00 5,100.00 26 COD W ELLS �$425 EA ���
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES __. _.
580.00 - 2CODETJIWELLS�$290EA(RE-BILL)
Exhibit 2
Page 1 of 3
2244033 JOINTRESOURCES 52718
2244033 JOINTRESOURCES ��� 52718
2244295 KROCANENERGVCORP ��� 52719
2244295 KROCANENERGVCORP ��� 52719
_ ..... ..... ..... . ......
22442ff7 LEGEND NATURAL GAS IV, LP 52720
22442ff7 LEGEND NATURAL GAS IV, LP 52720
2244287 LEGEND NATURAL GAS IV, LP �� � 52721
2244287 LEGEND NATURAL GAS IV, LP �� � 52721
2244105 PIONEER NATURAL RES USA, INC , 52724
2244210 TEJAS WESTERN CORP 52727
2260797 TELEO OPERATING,LLC 52728
2260797 TELEO OPERATING,LLC ��� 52728
_ ..... ..... ..... . ......
2244236 TRIOCONSULTING&MANAGEMENT : 52729
2244236 TRIOCONSULTING&MANAGEMENT 52729
2244236 TRIOCONSULTING&MANAGEMENT 52730
2244236 TRIOCONSULTING&MANAGEMENT 52730
2244236 TRIOCONSULTING&MANAGEMENT 52730
2244236 TRIOCONSULTING&MANAGEMENT 52730
2244244 VANTAGEFORTWORTHENERGV 52731
2244244 VANTAGEFORTWORTHENERGV 52731
2244244 VANTAGEFORTWORTHENERGV 52732
2244244 VANTAGEFORTWORTHENERGV 52732
2243997 WAVNE HARPER.. ..... 52713
_ ..... ..... ..... . ......
2243997 WAVNE HARPER 52713
_ ..... ..... ..... , ......
2243997 WAVNE HARPER 52714
_ ..... ..... ..... . ......
2243997 WAVNE HARPER 52714
2244279 XTO ENERGV INC 52733
2244279 XTO ENERGV INC �� � 52733
2244279 XTO ENERGV INC �� � 52734
2244279 XTO ENERGV INC �� � 52734
106 ! ... 1,275 00
106 ���'... ..... 425.00
1 11
425.00
850.00
350.00
1 11
850 00
870.00
850.00
6A5 WELLINSPEC�IONS
2011 BILLIN6
:1 11
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
1,275.00 3 COD WEI15 �$425 EA �
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
425.00 - 1CODWELL�$425EA ���
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
9,775.00 1,700.00 27 COD W ELLS �$425 EA
..... .._ __
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
290.00 1 ETJ-1 WELL @$290 EA ���
4,060.00 RE-BILL 14 ET1-1 WELL @$290 EL
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
290.00 1 ETJ-1 W ELL @$290 EA ���
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
2,125.00 SCODWEIIS�$425EA �
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
4,675.00
425.00 1,700.00
290.00
425.00 1 COD WELL �$425 EA
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
850.002CODWEIIS�$425_EA __
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
5,100.00 4,250.00 22 COD W ELLS �$425 EA __
425.00 RE-BILLICODWELL�$425.00EA
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES �
290.00 1 ETJ-1 W ELL @$290 EA �� �
580.00 RE-BILL-2 ETJ-1 WELLS �$290 EA
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES �
7,650.00 18 COD W ELLS �$425 EA
..... .._ __
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
1,450.00 5 ETJ-1 W ELLS �$290 EA �� �
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES �
850.002CODWEIIS�$425_EA __
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
870.00 3 ETJ-1 W ELLS �$290 EA �� �
20116AS WELLINSPEC�ION FEES
850.00 2CODWEIIS�$425EA �
20116AS WELL INSPEC�ION FEES �
2,030.00 7 ETJ-1 W ELLS �$290 EA �� �
Page 2 of 3
6A5 WELLINSPEC�IONS
2011 BILLIN6
Page 3 of 3
2012 GPS WELLINSPECTION FEES �X� 1+✓ 1 l. .7
Gas Well Inspections Division
2011 Inspection Summary
April - June*
Number of Violations 0
Number of Inspections 590
* Well ID inspections only
July & August
Number of Violations 671
Number of Inspections 217
September
Number of Violations 272
Number of Inspections 143
October
Number of Violations 347
Number of Inspections 179
November
Number of Violations 225
Number of Inspections 176
December
Number of Violations 829
Number of Inspections 287
SUMMARY
Total Violations 2344
Total Inspections 1592
1/23/2012
Exhibit 4
Page 1 of 8
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
C
2011 Inspection Summary
April - June* July & August September October November December
*Well ID inspections
Number of Inspections Number of Violations
Page 2 of 8
Overview Summary of Inspection Findings in City of Denton and ETJ Division I
Gas Well Inspections (GWI) Division Activities
590 well identifying inspections to confirm status only, no compliance inspections
- non-compliant signage
- equipment not painted
- unsecure equipment
- tall weeds and grass
- non-compliant secondary containment
- unkempt site
- unsecure site entry gates
- access road/site repairs required
- no level controllers on tanks
- no drip pots
- site repairs, e.g., tank leaks, worn seals, no safety equipment, thief hatch open/missing, worn/corroded equipment
- no HAZMAT plan or MSDS sheets filed with City
- no flow line markers installed on-site
- require foam line repairs
- soil contamination, clean-up required immediately (5 in COD � 2 in ETJ DI)
- ponds require remediation, i.e., frac pond and liners not cleaned after use
- no site access provided
- no notification of work
- pondsnotfenced
- wells being plugged, plugging plan requested
- unauthorized release
0 - total violations
April to June 2011 Page 3 of 8
Overview Summary of Inspection Findings in City of Denton and ETJ Division I
Gas Well Inspections (GWI) Division Activities
22 operators received a Notice of Violation (NOV)
217 total notices sent (some notices contained multiple violations, but were issued per inspection)
159 - non-compliant signage
104 - equipment not painted
83 - unsecure equipment
54 - tall weeds and grass
43 - non-compliant secondary containment
42 - unkempt site
38 - unsecure site entry gates
29 - access road/site repairs required
24 - no level controllers on tanks
23 - no drip pots
17 - site repairs, e.g., tank leaks, worn seals, no safety equipment, thief hatch open/missing, worn/corroded equipment
13 - no HAZMAT plan or MSDS sheets filed with City
8- no flow line markers installed on-site
8- require foam line repairs
7- soil contamination, clean-up required immediately (5 in COD � 2 in ETJ DI)
5- ponds require remediation, i.e., frac pond and liners not cleaned after use
4- no site access provided
4- no notification of work
3 - ponds not fenced
2- wells being plugged, plugging plan requested
1 - unauthorized release
671 - total violations
July and August 2011 Page 4 of 8
Overview Summary of Inspection Findings in City of Denton and ETJ Division I
Gas Well Inspections (GWI) Division Activities
14 operators received a Notice of Violation (NOV)
143 total notices sent (some notices contained multiple violations, but were issued per inspection)
44 - non-compliant signage
33 - equipment not painted
18 - unsecure equipment
45 - tall weeds and grass
8 - non-compliant secondary containment
6 - unkempt site
18 - unsecure site entry gates
35 - access road/site repairs required
15 - no level controllers on tanks
5 - no drip pots
12 - site repairs, e.g., tank leaks, worn seals, no safety equipment, thief hatch open/missing, worn/corroded equipment
2- no HAZMAT plan or MSDS sheets filed with City
16 - no flow line markers installed on-site
2- require foam line repairs
3- soil contamination, clean-up required immediately (5 in COD � 2 in ETJ DI)
2- ponds require remediation, i.e., frac pond and liners not cleaned after use
0- no site access provided
3- no notification of work
4 - ponds not fenced
0- wells being plugged, plugging plan requested
1 - unauthorized release
272 - total violations
September 2011 Page 5 of 8
Overview Summary of Inspection Findings in City of Denton and ETJ Division I
Gas Well Inspections (GWI) Division Activities
14 operators received a Notice of Violation (NOV)
179 total notices sent (some notices contained multiple violations, but were issued per inspection)
50 - non-compliant signage
27 - equipment not painted
23 - unsecure equipment
75 - tall weeds and grass
12 - non-compliant secondary containment
8 - unkempt site
21 - unsecure site entry gates
44 - access road/site repairs required
34 - no level controllers on tanks
9 - no drip pots
8- site repairs, e.g., tank leaks, worn seals, no safety equipment, thief hatch open/missing, worn/corroded equipment
6- no HAZMAT plan or MSDS sheets filed with City
8- no flow line markers installed on-site
3- require foam line repairs
4- soil contamination, clean-up required immediately (5 in COD � 2 in ETJ DI)
3- ponds require remediation, i.e., frac pond and liners not cleaned after use
0- no site access provided
5- no notification of work
4 - ponds not fenced
2- wells being plugged, plugging plan requested
1 - unauthorized release
347 - total violations
October 2011 Page 6 of 8
Overview Summary of Inspection Findings in City of Denton and ETJ Division I
Gas Well Inspections (GWI) Division Activities
15 operators received a Notice of Violation (NOV)
176 total notices sent (some notices contained multiple violations, but were issued per inspection)
32 - non-compliant signage
15 - equipment not painted
11 - unsecure equipment
44 - tall weeds and grass
10 - non-compliant secondary containment
8 - unkempt site
7- unsecure site entry gates
23 - access road/site repairs required
20 - no level controllers on tanks
9 - no drip pots
15 - site repairs, e.g., tank leaks, worn seals, no safety equipment, thief hatch open/missing, worn/corroded equipment
15 - no HAZMAT plan or MSDS sheets filed with City
5- no flow line markers installed on-site
1- require foam line repairs
2- soil contamination, clean-up required immediately (5 in COD � 2 in ETJ DI)
2- ponds require remediation, i.e., frac pond and liners not cleaned after use
0- no site access provided
3- no notification of work
2 - ponds not fenced
0- wells being plugged, plugging plan requested
1 - unauthorized release
225 - total violations
November 2011 Page 7 of 8
15 - operators that received inspection report
287 - site inspections completed
SIGNAGE: 14
Reflective lettering or proper lighting 4
LETTERS: 2" 4
Operating Company Name 4
Site Address - 20
Well Name 4
RRC Permit and Well API Numbers 27
Emergency 911 Number 87
Company 24-hour Contact Phone Number 14
"DANGER NO SMOKING ALLOWED" (4" Letters) 4
STREETS:
Streets free of dirt and debris from site operations 7
ROW appears to be in good condition and not damaged 37
FENCI NG:
Secure and locked gate 30
8 foot masonry wall installed, if required 0
Security fencing or 24-hour on-site supervision 17
EQ UI PMENT:
Painted and maintained 87
Layout as specified per permit, site plan, or plat 0
Permanent equipment less than 8 feet in height, as applicable 9
ELECTRICAL LINES:
Safe distance from site and equipment 0
Located compatible to surrounding areas or subdivision 0
PIPELINES:
Adequate markers for indentified locations 7
PITS: (Where applicableJ
Liner(sJ & fencing in place 0
Liner(sJ free of punctures or other damage 1
MISCELLANEOUS:
Erosion control in place 134
Secondary containment in place - Steel or Concrete with liner 10
Drip pots at all disconnect points 30
Accessible emergency shut-off valves 0
MSDS sheets stored on site, as required 0
HAZMAT Management Plans on file with City 0
Storage tanks equipped with a level controller 60
Lightening arrestor system installed as required 84
Site lighting does not affect adjacent properties or ROW 0
Property free of trash, debris, weeds/brush, pools of liquid 134
Odors, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration controlled or mitigated 0
Total s29
1- Citation issued
December 2011
Page 8 of 8
11 - operators that recieved inspection report Response Codes
296 - site inspections completed 1= low, 2= normal, 3= immediate
Violation Description Code COD ETJ ` Total
Street or ROW: not free of dirt and debris from site operations - COD 3 19
Street or ROW: does not appear to be in good condition and not damaged - COC 3 1
Sign: not posted at entry - COD/ ET! 2 31
Sign: no reflective lettering or proper lighting - COD 1
Sign: 2" letters not installed 1
Sign: operating company name not listed - COD/ ET! Z
Sign: site address not listed - COD 2 118
Sign: well name not listed - COD/ ET! Z
Sign: RRC production number(5J and API number(5J not listed- COD Z Z
Sign: Emergency 911 is not posted - COD Z 4
Sign: company 24-hour contact phone number not posted- COD/ ET! Z
Sign: "DANGER NO SMOKING ALLOWED" (4" �etters) not posted - COD Z
Sign: H25 not posted - COD Z
Fence: no secure and locked gate - COD Z 17
Fence: 8 foot masonry wall not installed, if required Z
Fence: no security fencing in place or 24-hour on-site supervision - COD Z 4
Site: trees being removed - COD/ET! 3
Site: lighting does affect adjacent properties or ROW - COD Z
Site: not free of trash, debris, weeds/brush, pools of liquid - COD/ET! Z 44
Site: odors, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration are not controlled or mitigated - COD 3
Site: unauthozised discharge of a subastance present - COD/ ET! 3
Site: gas vented near a residential area - COD 3
Site: in an ESA or flood way - COD/ET! Z
Site: erosion control not in place, rock coverage not adequate - COD /ET! Z 49
Site: not on less than a 10 percent slope - COD/ET! Z
Set backs: requirements are not meet from the site boundary- COD 1
Equipment: not painted and maintained - COD 3 Z9
Equipment: layout is not as specified per permit, site plan, or plat - COD / ET! Z 1
Equipment: not less than 8 feet in height - COD 1
Equipment: automated emergency valve not present - COD/ET! 3
Equipment: emergency shut in valve not present between wellhead and flow line - COD/ET! 3
Equipment: heater present on site - COD 1
Equipment: compressor present on site - COD/ ET! 1
Equipment: internal combustion compressor installed - COD 1
Equipment: lightening arrestor system are not installed - COD/ET! 1 1
Equipment: foam line connection no tistalled and flow lines not located - COD/ET! Z
Tank Battery: tank(sJ are not equipped with a level control device - COD/ET! 2 14
Tank Battery: tank(sJ are not anchored for stability - COD/ET! Z
Tank battery: drip pot(sJ are not at all disconnect points - COD/ET! Z
Secondary Containment: not in place with Steel or Concrete with liner - COD/ET! Z 3
Secondary Containment: does not have adequate capapcity - COD/ET! 3
Electrical Lines: not a safe distance from site and equipment - COD 3
Electrical Lines: not located compatible to surrounding areas or subdivision - COD 1
Flow & Gatheirng Lines: not adequate markers located where line crosses street or road - COD 1
Flow or Gathering Lines: flow lines running in a right-of-way - COD 3
Structures: structures are built above a flow or gathering line - COD 3
Drilling Mud: not a freshwater-based system - COD/ET! 3
Drilling: mufflers are not present on internal combustion engines on drilling site - COD 3
Drilling: not platted and/ or permitted- COD/ET! Z
Pits: located within 200' of water way lined - COD/ET! 3
Pits: not fenced and secure - COD/ ET! 3
Pit Liner(s): punctures or other damage exist - COD/ET! 3
Pit: substances in reserve higher than allowed - COD/ET! 3
Exhibit 5
0 - Citations
January 2012
Page 1 of 2
11 - operators that recieved inspection report Response Codes 0- Citations
296 - site inspections completed 1= low, 2= normal, 3= immediate January 2012
Page 2 of 2
17 - operators that recieved inspection report Response Codes
224 - site inspections completed 1= low, 2= normal, 3= immediate
Violation Description COde COD ETJ ` Total
Street or ROW: not free of dirt and debris from site operations - COD 3 0 0 0
Street or ROW: does not appear to be in good condition and not damaged - COD 3 32 7 39
Sign: not posted at entry - COD/ ET! 2 8 9 1�
Sign: no reflective lettering or proper lighting - COD ], 0 0 0
Sign: 2" letters not installed ], 0 0 0
Sign: operating company name not listed - COD/ ET! 2 0 0 0
Sign: site address not listed - COD 2 0 12 12
Sign: well name not listed - COD/ ET! 2 0 3 3
Sign: RRC production number(5) and API number(5) not listed- COD 2 0 6 6
Sign: Emergency 911 is not posted - COD 2 3 6 9
Sign: company 24-hour contact phone number not posted- COD/ ET! 2 5 0 5
Sign: "DANGER NO SMOKING ALLOWED" (4" �etters) not posted - COD 2 2 2 4
Sign: H25 not posted - COD 2 0 0 0
Fence: no secure and locked gate - COD 2 ZD 8 Z8
Fence: 8 foot masonry wall not installed, if required 2 0 0 0
Fence: no security fencing in place or 24-hour on-site supervision - COD 2 15 6 21
Site: trees being removed - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Site: lighting does affect adjacent properties or ROW - COD 2 Z 0 Z
Site: not free of trash, debris, weeds/brush, pools of liquid - COD/ET! 2 29 33 62
Site: odors, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration are not controlled or mitigated - COD 3 0 0 0
Site: unauthozised discharge of a subastance present - COD/ ET! 3 3 0 3
Site: gas vented near a residential area - COD 3 0 0 0
Site: in an ESA or flood way - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Site: erosion control not in place, rock coverage not adequate - COD /ET! 2 33 17 50
Site: not on less than a 10 percent slope - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Set backs: requirements are not meet from the site boundary- COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: not painted and maintained - COD 3 z4 18 4z
Equipment: layout is not as specified per permit, site plan, or plat - COD / ET! 2 0 0 0
Equipment: not less than 8 feet in height - COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: automated emergency valve not present - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Equipment: emergency shut in valve not present between wellhead and flow line - COD/ET! 3 4 10 14
Equipment: heater present on site - COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: compressor present on site - COD/ ET! ], 0 0 0
Equipment: internal combustion compressor installed - COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: lightening arrestor system are not installed - COD/ET! ]. 6 14 20
Equipment: foam line connection no tistalled and flow lines not located - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Tank Battery: tank(sJ are not equipped with a level control device - COD/ET! 2 9 5 14
Tank Battery: tank(sJ are not anchored for stability - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Tank battery: drip pot(sJ are not at all disconnect points - COD/ET! 2 8 8 16
Secondary Containment: not in place with Steel or Concrete with liner - COD/ET! 2 7 10 17
Secondary Containment: does not have adequate capapcity - COD/ET! 3 3 12 15
Electrical Lines: not a safe distance from site and equipment - COD 3 0 0 0
Electrical Lines: not located compatible to surrounding areas or subdivision - COD ]. 0 0 0
Flow & Gatheirng Lines: not adequate markers located where line crosses street or road - COD 1 Z 3 5
Flow or Gathering Lines: flow lines running in a right-of-way - COD 3 Z 0 Z
Structures: structures are built above a flow or gathering line - COD 3 0 0 0
Drilling Mud: not a freshwater-based system - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Drilling: mufflers are not present on internal combustion engines on drilling site - COD 3 0 0 0
Drilling: not platted and/ or permitted- COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Pits: located within 200' of water way lined - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Pits: not fenced and secure - COD/ ET! 3 Z Z 4
Pit Liner(s): punctures or other damage exist - COD/ET! 3 0 Z Z
Exhibit 6
6 - Citations
February 2012
Page 1 of 2
17 - operators that recieved inspection report Response Codes
224 - site inspections completed 1= low, 2= normal, 3= immediate
6 - Citations
February 2012
Page 2 of 2
21 - operators that recieved inspection report Response Codes
331 - site inspections completed 1= low, 2= normal, 3= immediate
Violation Description COde COD ETJ ` Total
Street or ROW: not free of dirt and debris from site operations - COD 3 0 0 0
Street or ROW: does not appear to be in good condition and not damaged - COD 3 40 10 50
Sign: not posted at entry - COD/ ET! 2 10 15 25
Sign: no reflective lettering or proper lighting - COD ], 0 0 0
Sign: 2" letters not installed ], 0 0 0
Sign: operating company name not listed - COD/ ET! 2 0 0 0
Sign: site address not listed - COD 2 2 8 10
Sign: well name not listed - COD/ ET! 2 Z 0 Z
Sign: RRC production number(5J and API number(5J not listed- COD 2 Z 4 6
Sign: Emergency 911 is not posted - COD 2 Z 4 6
Sign: company 24-hour contact phone number not posted- COD/ ET! 2 Z 0 Z
Sign: "DANGER NO SMOKING ALLOWED" (4" �etters) not posted - COD 2 2 2 4
Sign: H25 not posted - COD 2 Z 0 Z
Fence: no secure and locked gate - COD 2 16 12 28
Fence: 8 foot masonry wall not installed, if required 2 0 0 0
Fence: no security fencing in place or 24-hour on-site supervision - COD 2 10 3 13
Site: trees being removed - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Site: lighting does affect adjacent properties or ROW - COD 2 0 0 0
Site: not free of trash, debris, weeds/brush, pools of liquid - COD/ET! 2 40 24 64
Site: odors, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration are not controlled or mitigated - COD 3 0 0 0
Site: unauthozised discharge of a subastance present - COD/ ET! 3 0 0 0
Site: gas vented near a residential area - COD 3 0 0 0
Site: in an ESA or flood way - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Site: erosion control not in place, rock coverage not adequate - COD /ET! 2 40 14 54
Site: not on less than a 10 percent slope - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Set backs: requirements are not meet from the site boundary- COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: not painted and maintained - COD 3 28 13 41
Equipment: layout is not as specified per permit, site plan, or plat - COD / ET! 2 0 0 0
Equipment: not less than 8 feet in height - COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: automated emergency valve not present - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Equipment: emergency shut in valve not present between wellhead and flow line - COD/ET! 3 6 6 12
Equipment: heater present on site - COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: compressor present on site - COD/ ET! ], 0 0 0
Equipment: internal combustion compressor installed - COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: lightening arrestor system are not installed - COD/ET! ], 12 16 28
Equipment: foam line connection no tistalled and flow lines not located - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Tank Battery: tank(sJ are not equipped with a level control device - COD/ET! 2 8 8 16
Tank Battery: tank(sJ are not anchored for stability - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Tank battery: drip pot(sJ are not at all disconnect points - COD/ET! 2 6 6 12
Secondary Containment: not in place with Steel or Concrete with liner - COD/ET! 2 9 12 21
Secondary Containment: does not have adequate capapcity - COD/ET! 3 4 10 14
Electrical Lines: not a safe distance from site and equipment - COD 3 0 0 0
Electrical Lines: not located compatible to surrounding areas or subdivision - COD ]. 0 0 0
Flow & Gatheirng Lines: not adequate markers located where line crosses street or road - COD 1 0 4 4
Flow or Gathering Lines: flow lines running in a right-of-way - COD 3 0 0 0
Structures: structures are built above a flow or gathering line - COD 3 0 0 0
Drilling Mud: not a freshwater-based system - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Drilling: mufflers are not present on internal combustion engines on drilling site - COD 3 0 0 0
Drilling: not platted and/ or permitted- COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Pits: located within 200' of water way lined - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Pits: not fenced and secure - COD/ ET! 3 0 1 1
Pit Liner(s): punctures or other damage exist - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
EXhlblt 7
1 - Citation
March 2012
Page 1 of 2
21 - operators that recieved inspection report Response Codes
331 - site inspections completed 1= low, 2= normal, 3= immediate
1 - Citation
March 2012
Page 2 of 2
21 - operators that recieved inspection report Response Codes
299 - site inspections completed 1= low, 2= normal, 3= immediate
Violation Description COde COD ETJ ` Total
Street or ROW: not free of dirt and debris from site operations - COD 3 0 0 0
Street or ROW: does not appear to be in good condition and not damaged - COD 3 17 0 17
Sign: not posted at entry - COD/ ET! 2 Z Z 4
Sign: no reflective lettering or proper lighting - COD 1 Z Z 4
Sign: 2" letters not installed ], 0 5 5
Sign: operating company name not listed - COD/ ET! 2 0 0 0
Sign: site address not listed - COD 2 0 8 8
Sign: well name not listed - COD/ ET! 2 0 0 0
Sign: RRC production number(5J and API number(5J not listed- COD 2 0 12 12
Sign: Emergency 911 is not posted - COD 2 0 4 4
Sign: company 24-hour contact phone number not posted- COD/ ET! 2 0 0 0
Sign: "DANGER NO SMOKING ALLOWED" (4" �etters) not posted - COD 2 0 5 5
Sign: H25 not posted - COD 2 0 0 0
Fence: no secure and locked gate - COD 2 6 6 12
Fence: 8 foot masonry wall not installed, if required 2 0 0 0
Fence: no security fencing in place or 24-hour on-site supervision - COD 2 0 4 4
Site: trees being removed - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Site: lighting does affect adjacent properties or ROW - COD 2 0 0 0
Site: not free of trash, debris, weeds/brush, pools of liquid - COD/ET! 2 11 15 26
Site: odors, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration are not controlled or mitigated - COD 3 1 0 1
Site: unauthozised discharge of a subastance present - COD/ ET! 3 1 1 2
Site: gas vented near a residential area - COD 3 0 0 0
Site: in an ESA or flood way - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Site: erosion control not in place, rock coverage not adequate - COD /ET! 2 13 10 23
Site: not on less than a 10 percent slope - COD/ET! 2 Z 0 Z
Set backs: requirements are not meet from the site boundary- COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: not painted and maintained - COD 3 14 8 ZZ
Equipment: layout is not as specified per permit, site plan, or plat - COD / ET! 2 0 0 0
Equipment: not less than 8 feet in height - COD ], 0 0 0
Equipment: automated emergency valve not present - COD/ET! 3 16 6 22
Equipment: emergency shut in valve not present between wellhead and flow line - COD/ET! 3 3 6 9
Equipment: heater present on site - COD ], 3 7 10
Equipment: compressor present on site - COD/ ET! ], 11 5 16
Equipment: internal combustion compressor installed - COD ], 6 0 6
Equipment: lightening arrestor system are not installed - COD/ET! ]. 6 8 14
Equipment: foam line connection no tistalled and flow lines not located - COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Tank Battery: tank(sJ are not equipped with a level control device - COD/ET! 2 6 12 18
Tank Battery: tank(sJ are not anchored for stability - COD/ET! 2 Z 0 Z
Tank battery: drip pot(sJ are not at all disconnect points - COD/ET! 2 7 4 11
Secondary Containment: not in place with Steel or Concrete with liner - COD/ET! 2 0 12 12
Secondary Containment: does not have adequate capapcity - COD/ET! 3 4 8 1z
Electrical Lines: not a safe distance from site and equipment - COD 3 0 0 0
Electrical Lines: not located compatible to surrounding areas or subdivision - COD 1 Z 0 Z
Flow & Gatheirng Lines: not adequate markers located where line crosses street or road - COD 1 0 0 0
Flow or Gathering Lines: flow lines running in a right-of-way - COD 3 0 0 0
Structures: structures are built above a flow or gathering line - COD 3 0 0 0
Drilling Mud: not a freshwater-based system - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Drilling: mufflers are not present on internal combustion engines on drilling site - COD 3 0 0 0
Drilling: not platted and/ or permitted- COD/ET! 2 0 0 0
Pits: located within 200' of water way lined - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Pits: not fenced and secure - COD/ ET! 3 0 0 0
Pit Liner(s): punctures or other damage exist - COD/ET! 3 0 0 0
Exhibit 8
1 - Citation
April 2012
Page 1 of 2
21 - operators that recieved inspection report Response Codes
299 - site inspections completed 1= low, 2= normal, 3= immediate
1 - Citation
April 2012
Page 2 of 2
�
�
�
�
V
L
0
L�L
�
N
�
—
—
a�
�
�
c�
�
�
i
0
�
�
a�
0
�
0
0
0
�
N
�--I
N
�
�
�
�
�
�
i
0
—
.N
>
._
0
�
�
0
—
V
a�
�
�
�
—
—
a�
�
�
c�
�
a�.�o s� a s�
sa ua o� n u � aa
.
2 Wate r 11
0
Other Gas Dri I I i n Related
�
Faci I ities
2
7
Lease Process a nd Pro ert
p Y
Ac u isitions
q
C��
9 Cit I nf rastructu re 2
y
�
�
■�
�
�
�
�
O
■�
�
■�
�
�
au� n uo�s��a
. ..
�
�
■�
�
�
■�
�
�
�
�
■�
�
O
L
�
�
�
�
O
■�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
O
■�
�
■�
�
■�
�
�
O
■�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
suo� �a su �n u u
.
suo� �a su �n u u
.
suo� �a su a�u�� uao
. .
�u� ��.� uo� �adsu /C uo -
.�i 1 .� I I�I� W Z � OZ
ua n �.� o�.� o
.
ua n �.� o�.� o
.
au � aua � a�ua �xo.�
. . .
�
�n.� a a�u �
.