HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-21-1986
A6tndr~
ZL Qc)tinxl
oo-) 1 192
4%w A
Y
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
January 11, 1986
Work, Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
January 21., 1986, at 5:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Roos of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:00 P.M.
1. Consideration of conditions and economic impact
analysis on Z-1779 (Petition of Miller of Texas -
Lakeview Development).
2. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
January 21, 1986, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
11 Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of December 17, 1985.
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed bolow are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
9.A and 9.B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ordinance.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 21, 1986
Page Two
1. Bid N 9570 - Fire Department Uniforms
2. Purchase Order 0 71270 to Alamo Transformer
in the amount of $15,500.00
3. Purchase Order # 71712 to Joan Cohagen In
the amount of $65,223.00
4. Purchase Order 0 71918 to Motorola in the
amount of $50,568.00
8. Plats and Replats:
1. Approval of preliminary plat of the Chad
Miller Addition, Lot 10 Block 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
2. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Snider Additioi;, Section II, Lots 1, 29
31 20, 21, 22 and 23, Block 6. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
Mrs. McKennon's Addition, Lot 6, Block 1.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
4. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Northside Addition, Lots 10 and 11,
Block 2. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
S. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Golden Triangle Industrial Park
Addition, Phase V, Lot 2, Block 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
6. Approval of preliminary plat of the
Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Home
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
31 Consider approval of request by Girl Scouts of America
to hang a banner across Carroll Boulevard at
University advertising the Girl Scout cook sale.
I
3
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 21, 1986
Page Three
4. Receive a recommendation on city funding of utility
costs for the Community Food Center in the Razor
building for the remainder of fiscal year 1986. (The
Human Resources Committee recommends approval.)
5. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 34.68 acres situated in the M.
Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, and beginning
approximately 250 feet south of and perpendicular to
the centerline of FM 4269 approximately 2,000 feet
east of Mayhill Road (A-14). (Te Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
6. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 150 acres situated in the D.
Hough Survey, Abstract 6469 and beginning west of
Mayhill Road, approximately 4,000 feet north of I-35
(A-17). (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
7. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 60.38 acres situated in the G.
Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and beginning adjacent
and east of Edwards Road approximately 1,000 feet east
of Mayhill Road (A-18). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
8. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1725. Petition of R. 0. McDonnell requesting a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD)
district on a 39.4 acre tract located on the
south side of FM 426 (Bast McKinney Street)
approximately 2,000 feet east of Mayhill Road.
If approved, the planned development will permit
the following land uses:
5.9 acres - general retail
33.5 acres - duplex
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
a change in zoning on a 39.4 acre tract
located on the south side of FM 426 (Bast
McKinney Street) approximately 2,000 feet
east of Mayhill Road.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 11, 1986
Page Four
B. Z-1727. Petition of Hammett $ Nash, Inc.
requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the planned
development (Pit) district for light industrial
(LI) uses on a 50.1 acre tract located on the
west side of Mayhill Road 4,300 feet north of
Interstate 35 North. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
a change in zoning on a 50.1 acre tract
located on the west side of Mayhill Road
4,300 feet north of Interstate 35 North.
C. Z-1742. Petition of Tommy Corporation N.V.,
represented by Metroplex Engineering Corporation,
requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the planned
development (PL) classification on 60.38 acres.
The property is located north and east of Edwards
Road and shown in the Gideon Walker Survey,
Abstract No. 1330. The following land uses are
proposed for the planned development:
Single Family (SF-7) - 2S.0 acres, density 4.5
units per acre, total units 113
Zero Lot Line - 13.0 acres, density 6.1 units per
acre, total units 79
Multi-Family - 13.7 acres, density 1S units per
acre, total units 205
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
a change in zoning on a on 60.38 acres tract
located north and east of Edwards Road
9. Urdinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids.
City of Dentoi. Lity Council Agenda
January 21, 1986
Page Five
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing 136.588 acres beginning
approximately 500 feet east of the centerline of
U.30 Highway 377 and south of Brush Creek Road,
and being part of the George M. Daugherty Survey,
Abstract 351 (A-11). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 93.67 acres beginning
350 feet south of and perpendicular to the
centerline of U.S. Highway 380 and east of
Geesling Road (A-13). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 42.35 acres situated
in the S, Huizar Survey, Abstract 5149 and
beginning approximtely 500 feet north of and
perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Highway
380 and west of Masch Branch Road (A-15). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan instituting annexation of 765.1 acres
situated in the M.B.P. & P.R.R. Survey, Abstract
1470; the B.P. Anderson Survey, Abstract 16; the
B. A. Orr Survey, Abstract 983; the G.W. Anderson
Survey, Abstract 12; the M.B.P. & P.R.R. Survey,
Abstract 1502; and the T $ P Survey, Abstract
1302, Denton County, Texas; being part of a tract
known as the Golden Hoof Ranch and beginning
sou~t.h of U.S. Highway 380, east of FM 156, and
west of Egan Road. (A-32)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings on the
proposed annexation of approximately 614.6 acres
being part of the B, Pickett Survey, Abstract
1018, the N. Britton Survey, Abstract 51, the J,
Rogers Survey, Abstract 1084, the J. Rogers
Survey, Abstract 1085, and the B. Rogers Survey,
Abstract 1101, and beginning north of Old Alton
Estates, south of Ryan Road, west of FM 2181, and
east of the G,C. $ S.F. Railroad (A-30).
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
use of compensatory time under certain conditions
for employees governed by Article 12690,
V. To C. S., as amended.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 21, 1986
Page Six
10. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
Hospital Board to execute an easement to Ensearch
Corporation for the constuction and maintenance
of pipelines and appurtenances.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for
a Juvenile Police Officer.
C. Consider approval of a resolution approving the
nomination of Dr. Jim B. Pearson to Place 6 on
the North Texas Higher Education Authority, Inc.
11. Hold a discussion of request for annexation of
110.5255 acres located at Kings Row and proposed Loop
288, south of Oak Bend Estates, and south of Silver
Dome Road, for the purpose of determining whether to
begin the annexation process (A-33)6
12. Hold a discussion of petition of Bellaire West
Partners for annexation of approximately 102.49 acres
beginning adjacent and north of Jim Christal Road,
south of U.S. Highway 380 west, approximately 1/2 mile
east of Eagan Road and 3/4 mile west of Underwood Road
for the purpose of determining whether to begin the
annexaton process (A-34).
13. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
8. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
14. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Meabers to
suggest items for future agendas.
15. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 62SZ-17
V. A. T. S .
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. hoard Appointments Under Sac. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
CtTYOfD!'AII1pMITSX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 7e201 / TELFPNONE(sf7) 50043o7
ofNoe of IM Gtr Man"W
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMI Rick Svehla, .':,zing City Manager
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Lakeview Financial Information
Attached you will find an analysis of all the departments that
will be affected by the Lakeview development. Each division or
department had to make decisions and assumptions in order to
arrive at the numbers. The numbers have changed slightly from
the report of Dr. Bill McKee. There are a number of reasons
for this. Our population was a little bit larger because the
final build-out numbers changed somewhat because of better
information on the acreage in the tracts. Dr. McKee used
average salaries for personnel and we used a more detailed
analysis going through our job family steps. After having more
time to refine the information, we found we would need more
facilities or equipment than we had indicated earlier to Dr.
McKee. And finally we made some interpretations and estimates
in the support services departments that Dr. McKee did not
make. We estimate our total expenses caused by the development
to be $170804.464.00. We estimate the revenues from the
development to be $31,972.578.00.
With any new development there are also some intangibles that
are hard to measure. There will be more maintenance calls,
complaints, and requests for actions. However there will also
be benefits derived from this development that we have never
seen before. The six lane divided thoroughfare from 13S to
U.S. 390 follows the suggestions in the draft report from the
County thoroughfare plan. In addition to this the City has
tied down many off-site improvements to Blagg, Trinity Mills
and Mayhill Road. Added police and fire personnel as well as
structures will not on?" serve Lakeview but also the
undeveloped area between Mf,;•,,ill and Lakeview as it develops
and is inhabited by new citizens. The development of this
project will give us options in the Utility Department as well
as the ability to serve a large area north of 380. Library
r~rsA".,
Lakeview Financial Momo
January 17, 1985
Page 2
facilities mentioned would also be able to be used by the rest
of the city. The land dedication for parks and the additional
grant money given will be the first of its kind by a
development within the City. It would certainly help- us set a
precedent for future development.
Staff will continue to work on the numbers and if we find any
discrepancies we will continue to forward that information to
you.
c ve a
Acting City Manager
Attachments
ji
2757M
U
LAXEVIEW DEVELOPMENT
PRO FORMA
REVENUES:
Ad Valorem Taxes $26,896,806,00
Sales Taxes, . 1,5060125,00
Fines and Fees 69, 500.00
Solid Waste. 20218.147.00
Utilities. 1,2811900 00
TOTAL $319972,578.00
EXPENDITURES:
Traffic Control. $ 86,000.00
Animal Control . , . . . . . SOS0708,00
Police 6, 303, 889.00
Fire 10OS7061S.00
Parks and Recreation ,
Administration 1300000.00
Recreation 3809000.00
Parks. 4909000,00
Building Operation 60,000.00
Library, . , , , . 372,900,00
Solid Waste. . ,
Residential, 19357,249.00
Commercial 4489967,00
Utilities. 10281,900.00
Miscellaneous. 609,989,00
TOTAL $1300849217,00
C.PITAL AND OTHER NON-OPERATING EXPBNSES:
Capital Improvements . , , , , $1306000000,00
Debt Service , , , , , . , , , , 11120,247.00
TOTAL $14,7209147.00
NET GAIN (LOSS)
PINAkCLAL INPACT PON LAIMItli DrAM M81T ON AN KU OWMOL
87-88 88-89 89-90 90-91 91-92 02-93 93-94 94-9S 9S-96 96-97 97-98 90.99 99.00 00-01 01-02
"T5
Labor 0 200 300 400 SOO 1,000 189379 20,217 12,239 24,463 26,909 29,600 659120 '1,632 780795
U}erations 0 1,000 I,SOO 1,750 2,000 2,SOO 4,000 7,300 70800 8,300 8,800 10,000 20,000 21,000 22,000
Fixed Assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 160500 S00 0 0 10000 0 8,000 1,000 10000
Ucbt Service 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,S00 12,500 11.500
7UTAL 0 1,200 1,800 19150 2,500 3,500 389879 28,017 30,039 32.763 36009 39,600 1PS1620 106,132 11,299
SWI' 1w
(Additional 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Persowl) AGO ACD
IiwFa1T
(Additional 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
P.quiptent) Patrol Unit
Patrol Unit
tk11I1rIN(iS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20000 C 0
sq. ft. keimel space
k~VENU6S 0 $300 $400 $SOO $600 $800 $40000 $4,500 $40700 =5,000 $S, SO $60000 $11,000 $12,500 $129700
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF LAKWIM DE MIWERT AOR VAPFIC COKMOL
87-88 80-99 8990 90.91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99.00 00-01 01.02
OOS75
Labor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0
Uiarations 0 21000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,500 S,000 59500 6,000 70000 8,000 9,000 9,S'10 10,000 10,500
Fixed Assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 _ 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 21000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 7,000 81000 9,000 9,500 100000 104506
:;,nk.FF LNG
(Additional 0
Pbrsorm1)
IN4ENT
(Additional 0
Equipeen t)
BUILUIN(iS 0
ME: Costs expressed are for signal, signage, and working maintenance and include labor and materials.
POW CUL IMPACT Fm LAKIIBIM Mmam Mr OM poLICS
87.88 8tl•89 89-90 90.91 91.92 91-93 93-94 94-9S 95-96 96.r 97.98 98.99 99^00 00-01 01.02
1%kiTs
Labor 14,086 SO,SVI 55,639 85,189 93,818 117,387 1610101 2530336 3030918 3S90SS7 4200761 611,491 6830750 911,397 958,066
Operations 33,701 30.152 15,939 46467 32,335 51.948 S%606 82,013 73.769 79,579 65.445 147,469 148,854 183,OOS 128,419
Flied Assets
Debt Service
9UTAL 57,787 89,733 81.Sn 130,757 116,154 179,335 221,708 335,350 3779688 439,136 506,204 7580960 8324605 100040403 1.0860486
STAFFING
(Additlonal 1 P.O. I P.O. 0 1 P. 0. 0 1 P. 0. 1 P.U. I P.O. I P.O. 1 P.U. 1 P.U. 3 P.O. 3 P.O. 3 P.O, 0
Personnel) 1 Supv. I Supv. i Supv.
1 Cler. Sup 1 Cler. Sup, 1 Clem Sup
(Additional 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 3 4 0
Fpui P"t)
1WILDINGS
IUTAL CL161S
Labor S,1030186
Operations 1,214,M
,317,891
FIIMKIAL IM"ff FOR LAKEVIEW DF.Vb401119f1 ON PIRG
87.88 88-89 89.90 90-91 92-92 92.93 93-94 94-9S 9$-96 96.97 97-98 98.99 99.00 00-01 01-02
CUM
Labor 0 0 0 1,043,164 1,116,186 1,194,319 1,1779921 1,367,376 1,463,092 1,S65,SO8 1,675,094 1,792,350 ;,051,062 1,195,706
Operations 0 0 0 74,800 740800 740800 740800 74,800 74,800 74,800 74,800 74,800 74,800 74,800 71,800
Fixed Assets 0 0 0 213,583 2211581 211,583 211,583 2119583 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
llebt Service 0 0 0 85.000 85.090 85.000 85.000 85,000 85.000 85,000 SLOW 85,000 85,000 85.000 85.000
TVTAL 0 0 0 1,414,547 1,487,569 1,56S,7O2 3,619,304 1,738,7S9 1,612,892 1,715,308 1,834,894 1,9S2,150 1077,615 1,211,062 1,3SS,SO6
STA.PF ING
(Additional 0 30
Pvrsomel)
MOMENT
(Additional 0 3
Fiquipwnt)
BUILDINGS 0 1
9
9°•°. .'°4~+i mac.;-n_g ~,a <+xn+'xg . n
URBAN SERVICES ANALYSIS
. PARRS AMP RECREATION
1. What Park and Recreational facilities are currently serving this area or
are capable of serving this area if annexed and/or developed (federal,
state, local)? Our existing facilities are at or near maximum
use. This area would need its own facilities,
2. what capital projects and/or equipment will be needed to adequately serve
this area if annexed and/or developed based on the master plan or similar
standards.
Lquipment/Project
Q28crintion Estimated Cost Fiscal Year, Standard Used
See attached information
3. Now much additional funding will be needed for maintenance if annexation
and/or development occurs as proposed? See attached information
A. Will additional Personnel be needed to properly serve this area if annexed
and/or developed? Now many and, what
type Sew attached information
Additional comments:
~ 1 1
Person to contact it thore are g4tations Data
1129r,/2
Lakeview information
Median Acreage 6+ acres
School/Park Acreage 12,56 acres
7.20 acres
8.06* acres
27.82 acres
* We have asked the developer to consider donating an additional two
- acres at this site if the Corps of Engineers does not lease us
their property adjacent to this site*
Adjacent Corps of Engineers Property
Timber Creak 20+ acres
Cooper Creak 90+ acres
Pecan Creek 100+ acres
Proposed use of these areas might included
Pecan Creek
Golf Course
1 Outdoor Education Center
Beach
Boat Launch Facilities
marina
Day Use Areas (picnic, play)
Cooper Creek
Athletic Fields
Recreation Center/Pool/Tennis Courts
Picnic/Play Areas
Nature Area/Trail System
Timber Branch
Nature Area/Trail Q)Jtem
Picnic/Play Areas
Amphitheater
tt is possible to lease this Corps of Engineers property by assuming
the maintenance costs. We feel that we can start working on the
'.ease of the Pecan Creek area and, as the development takes place,
add the Cooper Creek and Timber Branch areas.
A typical lease with the Corps of Engineers would last 25 years and
could then be renewed for another 25 year increment. Environmental
impact studies will need to be undertaken for any major developments
we may undertake.
• Because the Corps of Fngineers would continue to own these areas,
grant funds from the state would not be available for development.
There is a possibility that funds could be redirected from Ray
Roberts or existing commitments on Lewisville, but at this time, the
chances of this cannot be determined.
Mandatory Dedication .
A mandatory dedication ordinance at the present levels would have
required 6496 acres.
Land standard: 3 acres/1,000 population or
1 acre/150 dwelling units
Total 9,699 dwelling units ■ 64.6 acres
Due to the high density levels, this development factors high
for population impact. Using the avetage service area of one
half mile radius from a neighborhood park, the development needs
at least three neighborhood park locations if there is safe
access across the major thoroughfare. We would also recommend
that, because of the high density within the park service areas,
the parks be between 10 and 15 acres in size. This development
should also contain a community park which would provide
athletic facilities, large picnic and play areas, and room for a
• recreation center and pool*
our requirements for parkland would, therefore, bet
3 neighborhood parks of
10 to 15 acres in size 30-40 acres
1 community park 20 to 30 acres in size 20-30 acres
All 64.6 acres would be required for this project in four
separate location.
Due to this development's location adjacent to Corps of
Engineers' property, we feel we can help most park requirements
by leasing their land if the developer provides access points
and some school/park sites.
Donation of Development Funds
The developer has also indicated that they plan to donate $250400
for the development of these park areas. we feel that this is .i
very positive move and the first time we know of that a developer
has made this type of donation.
~ariil
4:I
t
PARK AND RECREATION STANDApDS
200000 pop. Estimated
Outdoor Facilities Goal Standard Cost
Soccer Field 114,000 510 5000000
Football Field 1/100000 2.0 200,000
Picnic Shelters 1/2,500 8.0 200,000
Picnic Areas 1/11000 20.0 20,000
Baseball Diamond Lighted 1/60000 3.0 5000000
Softball Diamond Lighted 1 ?,000 3.0
Tennis Courts 1%2,SO0 8.0 5000000
250,000
Basketball Courts
1/5,000 4,0 40,000
handball/Racketball (4-Wall) 1/8400 2.0 20,000
Play Areaa 1/2,000 1010 100,000
Golf Course (18 hole) 1/250000 0.8 2,000,000
Swimming Pool 20,000 110 1,000,000
Shuffleboard Lighted 1/5,1000 4.0 500000
Horseshoe Lighted 1/5,000 4.0 20,000
Volleyball Lighted 1/50000 4.0 20,000
Amphitheatre 1/500000 0.4 250,000
Park Acreage 3ac/10000 60.0 3,000,000
Iad r facilities
• District Recreation
Center (with gym) 1/150000 1.3 2,000,000
Senior Center 1/500000 0.4 8000000
Swimming Pool 1/50,000 0.4 100000000
Outdoor Education Center 1/500000 0.4 400,000
Personnel Growth (200000 population)
1986 1987 2488 1989 1990 1995 2000
2002
Administrative Add 0 1 1 0_ 1
Total 0 0 1 2 2 3- 4 0
1
Recreation Add 0 0 1 0 1 3 k
Total 0 0 1 1
2 5 6 6
6
Parks Add 0 1 2 2 1 2 2
Total 0 1 3 5 0
6 8 10 10
Building operations Add 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 2 2 2
TOTALS 0 2 8 11 14 25 26 22`
Budgobt Growth (20,000 population)
1986 Dollars
Administrative Add $1971.586 0 30.000 40.000 0 70 000
30 000 p
Total $197,586 $1970586 $227,586 $2670586 $2670586 $2970586 $3270586
$327,586
Recreation Add $717.505 0 30-000 50.000 50.000 200 000 110.000
Total 0
;7170505 $717,505 $7470505 $7970505 $8470505 411,047,SOS ;1,0!70505 $10097,505
Parka {
Add 57072657 40 000 100 000 100 000 50,0 0 100.000 100,000
Total $7070657 $7470657 $847,637 $9470657 0
building $9970657 $1,0!7,637 ;1,117,657 ;),))7,657
ty operations h,$638,264 0 0 0
30.0010 30 000 0 0
Total $631,264 $638,264 $638,264 $6300264
$668,264 56980264 ;698111264 $698,264
TOTALS 62,261,012 $2,301,012 $2,461,012 $2,651,012 0,781,012 $3,141o012 $3,121.012 $3,321,012
Capital Needs (20,000 population) 1966 Dollars
Millions of Dollars
1966 1967 1968 1969 1990 1995 ipOg 2002
Land Acquisition L.O*
Park Development 0.5 2.5 2.5 1.0
Recreation Center 2.0
Pool 1.0
Golf Course 2.5
TOTALS 1.5 0.0 2.5 1.0
*If Corps of Engineers property is not leased
• • 1
Xax0RAIDUX
"t BMI XoKW o ASSISTANT CITY XAXA0=R
FROM JOILLA ORR, LIBRARY DIMTOR
owl IWACT Of LAKWIM MJ=CT ON LIBRARY SBRYI0R8 An RACILITIRS
DATE: January 15, 19%
The City's Library presently has a facility of 25,000 square feet, a staff
of 6 professionals and 22 olericals, and a collection of 96,146 hated To provida
the currant level of service to residents of Lakeview, the estimated costs would bee
Building space (8,000 sqa fta) # 600PCO0a
Staff (2 professiona; d 7 clericals) 147,500.
Operating budget 225_ a M@
TOTAL 9120900.
Using the fornnlas provided by the Taxes State Library in Austin for
adequate library servioeo space s=+quiresents are calculated at .75 time the
population served; staff at 1 professional per 10,000 and 1 clerical per 2,000
population servedl and sateriais at 1.5 tisss the population servedo based on the
our at population astisate of 610300 our Library should presently have facilities
of 45,979 square feet (a deficit of 20,975 square feet), a staff of 6 professionals
and 30 clericals (a deficit of 8 olerioals)o and a collection of 91.950 hens.
.;z r Y aiy t.c ;;..~.,-.a~ a ,T •-.pay ,1 . ,:.e'-sar a.s _ -c v ,
MEMORA"" TO BETTY KcKEAV
LAKSYIEif PROJECT IMPACT
Page -2.
By the year 2000, and bared on a population projection of 105,200, th,e
City's Library will require 78,900 square feet of facilities (added 53,900 square
feet), a staff of 10 professionals and 52 clericals (added 4 professionals and 30
clericals), and 157,800 items (added 61;654 items) to meet the demands of itu users.
The Lakeview project would significantly impact the Library's services and
facilities when it reaches its proposed completion in the year 2002 and the esti-
mated population potential of 209000, The Library should then add an additional
150000 square feet of service area, a staff of 2 professionals and 10 clericals,
and an additional 30,000 items in the collection to meet the demands of that patron
sector. This could most ideally be not by a branch location in that stator. The
budget impact would then be:
Start-up Costs:
Building (15,000 sq, ft: 0 *75/0q• ft.) 1,1250000.
Materials for start-up (30,000 items 0 $20/item) 6000000,
TOTAL 1,725,000.
Operating Budget Expenses:
Staff (2 Professional, 10 clerical) ~ 189,650.
Annual book budget 500000.
Maintenance, Utilities 310500.
Supplies, Miscellaneous 30500.
TOTAL 274,6500
Joe is Orr, Library irector
of/0733!/nv
o Rick Svehla
Jeff Meyer
John No0rane
1
17' V117w7rq" 77'r
I
CITY OF DENTgt
MEMORANDUM
'POs Hill Angelo, Assistant Director of Public Works
FROMr Charles Watkins, Superintendent of Solis! Waste
DATEt January i5, 1986
8MDJECTr FISCAL IMPACT OF LAKEVXEW ON T" SOLID WASTE DIVISIOy
Attached is uy assessment of the cost and revenues of the Lrkeview Devel-
opment for the Residential and Comsercinl sections of the Solid (taste
Division. The method used to estimate the impact on Residential is
self-explanatory. The method to estimate the impact upon the Commerciax',;,
section was moderately complex and I can go into detail on the mathodolo•°
gyp if you desire.
It appears that the development would be self-supporting and has the
potential to be profitable for the commercial services.
Charles S. Watkins
CSW/sc
sw9
Attachments
a
,a
1
;ry
r' 1-
SOLID WAM DIVISION
RZSIDXMrAL SZMCE
The Solid Waste Division currently operates twelve (12) residential
routes per week with six (6) vehicles. The Residential section current-
ly averages approximately 1,000 housinq units per route. To calculate
the cost of providing residential solid waste service, the following
estimate of labor, operations, and fixed onsets was mode for the re-
sources needed to operate one (1) vehicle on two (2) routes or 2,000
dwelling unitat
Vehicle Cost $ 34,667
Labor Cost 500230
Refuse sags 8,ti33
Fuel Cost 5,833
Maintenance 14rC00
Disposal Cost 10,437
Annual Cost to Serve
2,000 Dwellings $124,318
The number of units to be served by the Residential section includes all
dingle family units and all cluster units with a density of eight (8)
units per acre. Cost figures on the attached page were derived by
calculatinq a per unit cost and multiplying by the cumulative number of
units. Revenues were computed by using the existing $8.50 per month
rate x 12 months x cumulative number of units.
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE
SUMMARY REPORT
CUMULATIVE '
DEW rrR18
YEAR UNITS TRUSFU SERVICE UNITS LABOR COST OPT ASSETS TOTAL
COST COST REVENUES
1987-1988 0 $ a s o o $ 0 $
a
t a s a s r.
1988-1969 92 1,221 1,080 92 2,287 1,830 10601 8,019 9,384
1989-1990 147 19951 1026 239 '?042 4054 4,160 20,834 24037P
1990-1991 1r:1 2,190 1,937 404 10445 80036 7,031 31,290 41,20A
1991-1992 197 2,614 2013 601 14,943 110955 10,460 52,389 61002
1992-1993 241 3,198 2,829 842 20,935 16,748 141655 73,396 85,884
1993-1994 239 31172 2,806 10081 26,876 21,502 18,814 94,230 110,26
* 994-199'3 181 2,402 2,125 1,262 31,378 25,102 21,965 1100008 128s724'
1995-1996 181 2,402 2,125 1,443 35,878 28,703 250115 125,786 1470186
1996-1997 174 1,778 1,S73 1,577 39,210 31068 27,447 137,467 160,854
1997-1998 46 610 540 1,623 40,354 32,283 28,248 141,476 1650546
1998-19'►9 46 610 540 1,669 41,498 33,198 29,049 145,487 170,238
1999-2000 0 0 0 1,669 41,498 33,198 29,049 145,487 1700238
2000-2001 0 0 0 10669 41,498 33,198 29,049 145,487 170,238
1001-2002 0 0 0 1,669 41,498 33,198 29r409 145,487 170,238
i
~7s 7-," 71TV7 IM- " '?.-esa• _r.. . fie.. a•'M .a -.t+p, tea' w !T'r;~.rst ;1."`tr'r7, ^ t `'g7fjps~% 3 :k 1+'7
SOLID WASH pIVZ8I0V
COMMRCIAL SZMCL►
Multifamily, retail, and office land uses are serviced by the Cosssercial
section of the solid Waste Division which must coapeto with private
service providers. ror the purpose of estimating Dosts and revs nie, it
was assumed that the solid Waste Division would capture 5Ot of the
ccmreercial solid waste business for each of the land use categories.
Based on current trend in the Cowm rcial section, it would require all
of the resources to operate one (1) commercial solid waste vehicle to
service 504 of the available business when ultimate development occurs.
Incremental costs are expressed as a proportion of ultimate cost as
follows:
Annual Vehicle Cost $35,966
Annual Labor Cost 23,000
Annual Fuel Cost 7,500
Annual Maintenance cost 17,333
Annual Disposal cost _13r270
• TOTAL $97,069
Cost figures were arrived at by dividing the cast of operating one
vehicle ($97,069) by the number of services per week. Revenues were
calculated by using formulas to determine the number of dumpsters and
number of dumpster services needed for each type of land use and multi-
plying by the current rate.
}
COMMMIAL smwrCE
SLJlI WY RMRT
. CLWAATIVE
!I>LEIf
DEBT LASOA AE81Cli TOTAL
BAR TRAINFLR BERVICB COST T COeT COST REVLTRIES
2987-1988 S 0 g 0 $ 0 0 $ co g o g a
1988-1969 392 347 695 ,130 1491
3,855 4,b7I
1989-1990 941 633 1,796 2,918 2068
9,256 21,215
1990-1991 998 884 10905 3,095 2,936 9,818 21,896
1991-1992 1,055 935 20014 3,272 3,104 10080 12,577
1992-1993 1,112 986 2,123 3p449 3m.272 10,942 13,258
1993-1994 1,515 1043 3,097 5,032 4,774 15,761 19,235
. .994-1995 1416 1,963 4,293 6,976 6,619 22,068 27,303
1995-1996 2,839 2,514 5433 9,154 80685 28,825 35,587
1996-1997 3,498 3,097 7,148 11,616 11420 36080 440911
1997-1998 4,364 3463 8,675 14,097 13074 44073 54 514
r
1998-1999 4,701 4,261 9,403 15,280 14,497 480042 59x017
1999-2000 6,536 5,785 12,905 20,970 190895 660091 800889
2000-2001 6,371 7,409 160406 260660 25,293 84,140 102,761
2001-2002 10,206 9,033. 190908 32051 300691 1020189 124,633
ti.' B_`#aas °.-<3 r -.g .cs,;,.^_ e•°4°' icy day s' + ~ ._p yy. T'l?~: 'Y,.
+ c ':...x r- y R
C/Ty'o10tMTgN, TtXAi MUNWAL BUILDING DENT(W TWS ?0201 r&EpWNE n»1 6e0-0s07
ONW of fM City Manama
M E M 0 R A N D U M
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Backup for Utilities Information on Lakeview
Development
The backup information on the potential cost of the Lakeview
development to the Department of Utilities was still in draft
fora as of Friday afternoon, January 17, 1986. The backup will
be provided to you by staff Tuesday night at the Council
meeting, If you have any questions in the meantime, I would be
happy to answer them.
C e a
Acting City Manager
ij
1760M
VIM !:w v;sv: 1p}" i+^ x.yrR.+ lr nr lr mrjr - ;am -f• y_ v+ sr i ,".y -..+w x r-;r <di1t*1Ryt`. a i" '
6
City Council Minutes ^
Meeting of December 170 1906
The Council convened into the Work Session at S:oo p.m. in the Civil
Defense Room.
PR$SLNTt Mayor Stewart] Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins: Council Nombers
Chew, McAdams, and Riddleaperger
Acting City Managers City Attorney and City Secretary
ASSSNTt Council Members Alford and Stephens
The Council considered the emergency agenda addendum item,
1. The Council held a discussion of the final report of the
Blue Ribbon Committee on Flow Memorial Hospital.
Mr. James Ki111ngsworth introduced the Blue Ribbon Committee
subcommittee chairpersons. Mr. Killingeworth reported that the
recommendation from the committee had originally to lease the
hospital assets to the 501 (c)(3) corporation. The committee now
was recommending a complete transfer of the assets of Flow Memorial
Hospital to the corporation. Also called for was a community based
board structure and full service management contract. The committee
was asking the Council to take two actions: (1) approve of the
concepts of the Blue Ribbon Committee recommendation! and (2)
impower the City Attorney and Flow Memorial Hospital Board of
Directors to proceed with preparation of the legal agreements, in
conjunction with the County Commissioners, to set the 501 (c)(3)
corporation in motion.
Mr. Sennett Kirk, Capital Formation Subcommittee Chairperson,
reported that the best plan was to transfer the assets of the City
and County to the foundation, This would give the corporation funds
and the authority to run the hospital and would also release the
City and County from liability. Flow would dedicate 31 of the net
revenue for the care of indigents.
Mr. Ken Newman, Management Subcommittee Chairperson, reported that
his group had looked at proposals and studies done by the previous
task force. He further stared that the City Council and
Commissioner's Court should be given credit for realizing the
problem and taking action. His subcommittee recommended that there
should be a 501 (c)(3) corporation, there should be a board of
advisors to receive citizen input, and there should be an actual
board of trustees with legal authority.
Council Member Stephens joined the meeting.
Mr. Newman summarized by stating that his subcommittee felt
professional management should be brought in.
Mr. Frank Davilla, Admission, Subcommittee Chairperson, reported
that they felt there should be a clear cut arrangement for indigent
care. Indigent care would be under Senate Bill {1, which was the
same as the Hill-Burton act. This was the philosophy which the
committee wanted to keep.
Dr. Don Holt, Institutional Development Subcommittee Chairperson,
reported that they had looked at future health care needs and
recommended an expanded role of the foundation to have a salaried
person in charge of the foundation. This person would be an idea
person and in charge of raising funds, Grant monies were
available, Another idea cunsidered was to form an insurance plan.
This was being looked at locally and would include large and small
employers,
Mr. Killingsworth asked for direction from the Council.
. Mayor Stewart stated that thla was a sensible approach which would
keep politics out of the process.
rK.vc, *'°4T traL'Y
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Two
Mr. Killingsworth stated that the Blue gibbon COMittee had done its
best work and felt the basic concepts and ideas were sound. They
were recommending I more function which was to assist in a consensus
fashion with the City and County for the initial appointments of the
advisory and trustee boards.
Council Member McAdams stated the report spoke of foregoing
subsidies from the City Council and County Commissioner's Court and
asked if this included indigent care.
Council Member kiddlesperger responded nor this could not be
answered now but rather left to future legal advise and opinion.
Mr. Sennett Kirk further stated that the city would be giving up the
assets and must have some consideration. This would be a clean
break. The level for indigent care had been act at 31.
Mr. Ken Newman stated that 31 would take care of indigent care as
defined under Senate Bill 1. This was all Flow Memorial Hospital
Could do and still grow.
Council Member McAdams stated her concern in giving up the right to
other subsidies.
1.ouncil Member Riddlesperger stated that this was the legal language
which must be used according to state law. if the actual indigent
care oosts were over 3t, the payment would be settled in court.
The Council returned to the regular work session agenda.
1. The Council received an update on the Affirmative Action
Plan.
Betty McKaan, Assistant City Manager, reported that the plan had
been updated and provided for Council approval and discussion.
Consensus of the Council was to approve the Affirmative Action Plan.
Council Member Chew left the meeting.
The Council lent the regular agenda order.
3. The Council received a report concerning land to be
included in poss.tble annexation of 296.97 acres being part of the I.
Coy Survey, Abstract 21 W. Burleson Survey, Abstract 931 B. Burleson
Survey, Abstract 2491 and the K. Johnson Survey, Abstract 6661
(proposed extension of city limits 3 1/2 miles along I-35N). A-26.
Acting City Manager. Rick Svehla reported this report was on the
annexation to process neir Sanger.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that if the annexation strip
was adjusted to be 500 feet wide it would only affect 1 business
(Love's), 5 to 120 feet of the Smith Brother's Roping front building
and about the same amount for 1 single family residence. The 750
feet strip would subtatantially impact 15 out of 18 businesses in the
annexation area. Ii' a decision was reached prior to January 71
there would be time to adjust the field notes and readvertise the
annexation for 500 feat.
Council Member Chewy joined the meeting.
Mayor Stewart. stated this report was for informatiot, only and the
Council could decide o» January 7th.
Council Member Alford joined the meeting.
The Council returned to the regular agenda order.
px
MENIMM
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Throe
. 2. The Council considered status of Land Use Planning
Commtttee.
Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported
that staff would like to add representatives from the following
cities to the Land Use Planning Committees Corinth, Argyle, Shady
Shores, Hickory Creek and Sanger.
Hopkins motion, Chew second to approve the suggested additions to
the committee. Motion carried unanimously.
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. No
official action was taken,
The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7;00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers.
PRESENTt Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins; Council Members
Alford, Chow, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
Acting City Managers City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENTt None
The council considered the emergency agenda addendum item.
1. The Council considered approval of the final report of the
Blue Ribbon Committee and endorsement of the concepts contained
therein.
Mr. James Killingaworth stated that the final report was the result
of work done beginning in September. The firsL 5 weeks were spent
reviewing options. The committee had chosen a nun-profit community
based corporation concept, Standards had been reviewed. It was
recommended that there by a transfer of assets which would be
complete and irrevocable, There would be an autonomous board of
trustees and a full service managemen*, contract would be entered
into. Institutional development issues would be addressed in
relation to long term needs for Flow. The Blue Ribbon Committee had
attempted to produce a forward looking recommendation. The
committee had held long deliberations and felt very strongly that
this was the best solution to the current hospital problem. The
committee was asking for a motion to accept the concepts presented
in the report and for authorization to proceed; authorization to
impower legal counsel to draw documents which would enable the
process to proceed.
Riddlesperger motion, Hopkins second to accept the concepts and to
authorize the preparation of the necessary legal documents to
proceed. Motion carried unanimously.
The Council returned to the regular agenda order.
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of November 19, 19851 the Special Called Meeting of
November 26, 1985= and the Regular Meeting of December 3, 1985.
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to approve the Minutes as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda items 2.A.8 and 2.A.9 were removed from the agenda by
staff.
. McAdams motion, Hop!.ins second to approve the Consent Agenda with
the exception of items 2.A.8 and 2.A.9. Motion carried unanimously.
z
a+,;"`'~~,rffr, ~ -YES;.;" r-..: - -s.. f::..:..: s•.:..3 s a ~°r'~,rss;.,r.r3gr »Y3'; ~.,-r~~sy~r.,... "fit `3",r'~r`~,. rs-. "ti
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Four
CUnaent Agenda:
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid 1 9542 - Pickups and vans
2. Bid 1 9543 - Loader backhoe
3. Bid 1 9545 - Refuse truck
4. Bid 1 9546 - Roll-off truck
5. Bid 1 9548 - Distribution transformers
6. Bid 1 9552 - Addition to Hayworth panel system
7. Bid 1 9553 - Derrick/line body
REMOVED BY
STAFFt 8. Bid 1 9554 - Sewer flushing truck
REMOVED BY
STAFF: 9, Bid 1 9556 - Radio maintenance
10. Bid M 9559 - Underground pulling unit
11. Bid 1 9564 - Wooden transmission poles
12. Sid 1 9565 - Enclosures and switchgear
13. Purchase order 1 71109 to IBM in the amount of
$38,034.00
14, Purchase Order 1 71501 to TRES Corporation for
annual maintenance of. Utility Billing System and
Meter Records system in the amount of $18,600.
(The 'rata Processing Advisory Board recommends
approv.
8. Plats and Replete:
1. Approval of preliminary and final replats of the
Wooded Acres Subdivision, Block 4. (The Planning
and zoning Commission recommends approval.)
2. Approval of final repiat of the Sun Valley
Addition, Lot 14, Block A. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Public Hearings
Agenda item 3.B. was moved forward in the agenda order.
B. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Tom D. Jester, Jr. requesting an amendment to a planned development
(PD-18) on a 5.3 acre tract located at the southeast corner of
Cooper Greek Road and Mingo Road. The property is further described
as the Safety Kleen Plant site. The amendment to the planned
development will permit the construction of an addition to an
existing warehouse, the construction of a loading dock, and an
addition to an existing boiler/still room facility. Z-1776
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Tom Jester, representing Safety Kleen, spoke in favor stating
that his client was trying to build a small office building and
expansion of their existing facility, The Council had previously
approved incustrial development bonds for this project. It had
,.gam iC^44~_~'•." t • y ~ .y. x in/ Y -t" ` i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of DOCCIRber 17, 1985
Page tive
subsequently been discovered that this Zoning was a planned develop-
ment and the proposed expansion had to be brought before the
Planning and Zoning Commission. A problsas existing with the time
frame. Industrial development bond projects must be built within 6
months and 2 months of the time had already lapsed. There were no
traffic or utility problems at the site.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor Closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that 4 reply forma had been
mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 in opposition. The Council
had approved the industrial development bonds for thw project and
the use was compatible with existing land uses. The Planning and
zoning Commission had voted 7 to 0 in favor of the petition with
conditions.
Stephens motion, 4opkins second to approve the petition. Motion
carried unanimously.
The council then returned to the regular agenda order.
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
George Hopkins, representing Tom Fouts, requesting a change in
zoning from the single family (SF-16) to the planned development
(PD) classification on 3.173 acres located east of Conway Street,
west of Lillian Miller Parkway, and south of I-35. The property is
more fully described as lots 6, 7, and 8, block 1, of the J. W.
Erwin Addition. If the planned development is approved, the
development of office buildings will be permitted. Z-1772
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Mr. George Hopkins, representing Mr, Tom Fouts and Mr, Cauble, spoke
in favor and presented an area map of the surrounding land uses. An
independent firm had been hired to complete a traffic impact study
of the area.
Mr. Sheldon Johnson, Barton, Aschman and Associates, spoke in favor
stating that his firm had prepared a traffic impact study. The
results had shown that the expected traffic generated by this
development would be 75 vehicles in the morning and 60 vehicles in
the evening which was very minimal for this general area. His firm
had looked at the traffic on Lillian Miller Parkway at the I-35
interchange. One could expect approximately 220000 vehicles per day
at this particular interchange with a decrease in vehicles further
south. His firm felt the traffic from this development could be
accommodated at an acceptable level of service. The office
development would generate less than 3% of the total traffic if the
entire area was developed. The staff report stated that the area
was already over the acceptable traffic densityl however, his firm
felt this was based on the moderate traffic area designation. The
Skaggs business in the area generated more traffic than would the
proposed office development. This area had developed into a high
intensity area and was a regional retail area, which was appropriate.
Mr. George Hopkins stated that the Provident Bank located on 6 acres
on Lillian Miller Drive and 1-35 was the first commercial zoning use
in the area, There was 14 acres owned by Dunning Development which
was zoned as general retail. In 1982, Mr, Fouts and Mr. Cauble had
requested general retail zoning for their property on the west side
of Lillian Miller. Staff had recommended to request office zoning
and to resubmit the petition. The property was zoned single family
(SP-16) at that time, The petitioners were led to believe that a
planned development for office uoe would receive favorable
consideration at a later date. on this basis, Mr. Pouts and Mr.
Cauble had paid their portion for the paving of Lillian Miller
1 17.
~a`+~'X~' `.i°54`:°i'A"d! s"*,p,.Tr, ,4-Fl : _T 'TF.Fi nri .'~T,.y °4 •m i ? a. R.Y'+~r s+;~n.:. •r. air
s
rte. .
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting pf December 17, 1985
Page Six
Parkway And for the extension of utilities. No action had been
taken ors the original request for zoning. A new petition was for a
plannoi development for office use was submitted and staff had
recom;nended two 2-story buildings on the ectt and two 1-story
buildings on the west. None of the adjacent property owners had
objections and several were in favor of the petition. This would be
a suitable buffer for the single family area and the high use
colamercial which was in place. Utilities were in place on the
west. The traffic density was exceeded only because the area was
designated for moderate intensity end was, in fact, a high intensity
use. His clients would add 2 lanes on the east of Lillian Miller
Parkway and extend the water line.
Mr. Mitchell Turner, 2118 Stonegate, spoke in opposition stating
that at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of November 20,
Mr. Hopkins had stated that there was a need for office buildings in
this area. Mr. Turner had obtained a listing of the office space
available at this time and there was presantly 171,000 square feet
available in Denton, An additional 277,000 egnare feet would be
available in the spring. These figures, added to building permits
for office space which had been issued, would bring the total amount
of office,space which would be available in Denton to approximately
1,018,000 square feet. He felt that there was ample office space
either currently available, zoned for office, or in the construction
process.
Mr. Bob Woodin, 2240 Stonegate, spoke in opposition stating that the
traffic was a critical issue. There currently was a terrific
bark-up of traffic on Lillian Miller and 1-35. Across from this
proposed planned development was an entrance and exit to Southridge
Village. Conway Street was not a dedicated street and once off of
the property, there would be a problem turning to the left. The
Provident Bank did not have a curb cut on the south east portion of
their property. Perhaps they were in favor of this petition because
they intended to direct their traffic into this lot and then out.
An office development would add approximately 817 vehicle trips per
day while single family would only add approximately 200.
Mr. R. B. Escue, Jr., 707 Riagecrest Drive, wished to speak in
opposition.
Mayor Stewart asked Mr. Eecue if, as a member of the Planning and
zoning Commission, he had voted on this petition when It was before
the commission.
Mr. Escue responded yea.
Mayor Stewart consulted with the City Attorney and stated that the
attorney felt Mr. Escue was out of order and should not be speaking
before the Cou,.cil,
Mr. Eecue responded that he had asked for a ruling on this issue
prior to the meeting and had been informed by Mr. Meyer of the staff
that there would not be a conflict.
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, reported that Mr. Escue did not
live within the notification area of the zoning change and,
therefore, would not be prohibited from voting on this petition at
the Planning and Zoning Commission, However, speaking at the public
hearing before the City Council, gave the appearance that Mr. Escue
was representing the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Council Member McAdams left the meeting.
Mrs. R. B. Escue, Jr, spoke in opposition stating that the intensity
on Lillian Miller would be increased. People needed homes and would
O not want to look at a 2-story office building adjacent to their
property.
iq
City of Denton City council minutes
meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Bevan
Ms. Margaret Fletcher, 615 Ridgecrest, spoke in opposition stating
there had been senseless destruction of trees resulting from
development. There were beautiful residential areas in Denton and
she did not wish to see the trees removed. The site plan for this
particular petition showed that the only trees which would be saved
were around the periphery of the property. Replanting of trees
should be required and the destruction should be stopped.
Council Member McAdams joined the meeting.
Mr. George Christy, 2416 Southridge, spoke in opposition stating
that the Council should not be deceived by the label but rather lank
at the package, if this petition were approved it would amount tc
overturning the whole basis of zoning and cast doubts on the entire
area. If the property were currently zoned commercial, the idea of
a buffer zone would be appropriate but who would purchase property
in an area where single family (SP-16) had been rezoned to
commercial. The City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission had
approved a plan for this area two years ago, If the petition were
approved, the council would not be lending credence to any of their
future actions,
Dr. Roland Vela, 729 Ridgecrest, spoke in opposition stating that
those who built their homes in this area did so becajee of the
natural beauty. Deed restrictions were in place to maintain the
character of the neighborhood. Residents had invested much money
and love into their homes and had been before many City councils to
defend this neighborhood and had been compromised. Dr. Vela further
stated that he felt a deception was being brought before the
Council. Office zoning had been promised on 3 acres in this area,
but not this 3 dares. The Denton Development Guide called for the
City to try to preserve the natural beauty of Southridge and the
entire area. He did not buy a home in this part of town to be
. surrounded by commercial development, apartments and traffic
problems. The residents were not against progress, but rather
wanted to preserve their neighborhood. Office space might be needed
but not in this area and there were other locations more suitable.
the traffic congestion was a real problem. He felt the original
developers had single family uses in mind and not to strip all of
the trees and concrete over the land. Adding to the traffic burden
was not in the best interests of anyone.
Mrs. Joe Skiles, 1407 Ridgecrest, spoke in opposition stating that
her husband had been the developer of Southridge and had chosen the
location because of the trees and beauty of the area. She hoped
that it would not be ruined by having the trees cut down. The
neighborhood and surrounding area was of great interest to her.
Me. Claudio Brown, 315 Ridgecrest, spoke in opposition stating that
she had recently moved to Denton and due to the traffic congestion,
it now took her longer to get to work that it had in Houston,
The Mayor allowed the petitioner 5 minutes for rebuttal.
Mr. George Hopkins, representing the petitioners, stated that the
area was protected and cut-off from Southridge. The cress would be
left around the periphery. In response to the statements regarding
the amount of office apace in Denton, much was combined with
office/warenouse and some was still under construction. He did not
believe that traffic would be a problem. Office use wan generally
regarded as a buffer between commercia; and single familyy, There
would be little activity associated with an office bui'iding after
working hours and would not disturb the residents. Single family
was not an appropriate use of this parcel.
Council Member Stephens asked if Mr. Hopkins and his dlients were
aware that the property was zoned single family (SF-16) at the time
>f the purchase,
Mr. Hopkins responded yes.
a
T' ''Y'.; .r;-+. .s° .~,ys.~. ~.,,.~g•.k;; ."Gimp
City of Denton City council Minutes
Meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Eight
The Mayor closed the pub°,ic hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that in 19$1 the Planning and
Zoning Commission had recommended denial of a petition for office
use, A xoning change had been recuestod on 4 aeparate occasions for
this parcel and had beer. withdrawn by the petitioner prior to
presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. There were 62
aoros abutting this property. The development would infringe on
Hobson ind Teasley Lane and should be monitored very closely. The
traffic study was presented r,t the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting and staff had not had an opportunity to study it. The Pit
had recommended approval by a vote of 4 to 3 with a number of
conditions. Staff would ask the Council to add 1 more condition
which was that no parking be allowed on front yard set-backs.
Council Member McAdams stated that she regretted tee hear Mr. Hopkins
speak of discussions and conversations which had taken place between
the owners, staff and others. Other entities could not make
commitments for the city Council. Dealing with verbal assurances
was asking for troubl,.. The traffic in this area was currently a
problem which would ii:crease when the Provident Hank was operating
at full: force.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he wished the developer had
made peace with the people in the area. In regard to zoning
changes, the Council looked to the neighbors for their opinions.
Council Member Stephens stated that plana were made for zoning in
particular areas so that when people bought property, they knew what
the zoning was. if the petition wer* approved, it would mean
further encroachment into an existing residential area and that
Lillian Miller Parkway Mould have to be expanded. A compromise had
been worked out fur the area to remain residential. The Skaggs
business was a result of a pre-existing usn for the Honda Shop. He
felt the move of commercial uses into residential areas should be
stopped. As in any other established neighborhood, the plan for the
area should be followed.
Acting City Manager Rick Svehla stated that he would like to respond
Lo several of Mr. Hopkins's comments. The developerP had been
approached and had agreed to donate right-of-way and pay for a
portion of the paving on Lillian Miller Parkway. All zoning changes
must go through the proper channels, Staff had advised Mr. Hopkins
and/or his clients that a request for a planned development on this
particular parcel would have a better chance of approval due to the
fact that s»ecifiC conditions could be attached to the petition.
Chew motion, Hopkins second to deny 2-1772.
Mayor Stewart stated that one of the most important aspects of the
quality of life in Denton was to maintain the character of the
neighborhoods, He ilso questioned curb cuts on arterial streets.
Mayor Pro Tem Hopkii;s stated that he believed a compromise had been
worked out when acce9s had been needed for Southridge, This
compromise included keeping the west side of Lillian Miller as
residential. This office building should be on the east aide.
Council. Member Chew stated that Lillian Miller Parkway should be the
dividing line.
Motion to deny 7-1772 carried unanimously. °
C. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of 1
Reward Joint Venture requesting a change in xoning from the single
family (SP-7) district to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 2.3 acre tract located on the south side of U.S.
Highway 380 Eaet, approximately 250 feet west of Redwood Street.
The property i,+ further described as a tract in the J,D, Lilley
Survey, Abstract 627. If approved, the planned development will
permit the construction of a two story 34,800 square foot office
building. 2-1777
City of Denton city Council Minutes
Meeting of December 17, 19es
Page Nine
. The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Mr. Preston Curry spoke in favor stating this this property was
owned by his parents,
Ms. Norma Curry spoke in favor stating that the Curry's had
purchased the property in 1948 with acreage on the north side of the
highway and built their home on the north side of the highway in
1950. The property was annexed by the City of Denton in 1952 and
all of the area to the north was zoned single family (sr-10) and the
area to the south was zoned single family (8l-7). The property had
been purchased because of the rural atmosphere but a need for change
and development had now been recognized, The Curry's had been
approached by developers over the years and believed that this plan
would offer the least amount of disruption to the neighbors. A firm
had been retained to work out any problems with the neighbors.
Mr. Mark Satey, real estate broker, spoke in favor stating that
steps had bean taken to work with the neighbors. Two neighborhood
meetings had been organized and held. The developers were going to
leave as many trees as possible and had agreed to construct a 6 foot
fence to buffer the office building from the residents. Every
effort hau been made to alleviate noise problems. Commercial or
restaurant uses had been ruled out for this particular property.
The neighbors were concerned about how the office building would
affect tneir property values but studies had shown the development
would not have a detrimental effect. Any concern about being able
to view the 2-story building would be handled by the trees, which
were taller than the building. Also there would not be a problem
with people being in the building after dark.
Mr. Roger Barrett, consultant, spoke in favor stating that a site
plan had been developed and an extension of landscaping was included
along Highway 380, The si►e presently was 100• forrested with some
trees being of a 2-story size. The developer was trying to save as
many trees as possible. There would be 30 feet set-backs on the
adjacent residential side. It was felt that this site was unique
and was a 'left out' or "hard to develop' lot. The present zoning
was for single family (9P-7). An attempt was being made to
eliminate single family use on a major highway and access streets
onto Highway 380. The possibility of standard residential use on
this property was remote. He did not feel that the traffic
generated by an office building would flow through the residential
area. Also, an office building would be vacant after 5:00 p.m. and
on week-ends,
Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that single family (SP-7) zoning was
current in place and asked Mr. Barrett if the office use was the
only development concept he could see.
Mr. Barrett responded that due to the configuration of the parcel,
^nly 1 or 2 homes could be constructea on this site.
Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated that this property could be combined
with the tract to the south and developed as a whole. If only this
portion were developed, it would close off access to the southern
property.
Ms. Carolyn Cushman responded that approximately 379 feet of
frontage on Highway 360 would be left.
Ms. Janice Collvins, 2011 Doyd, spoke in opposition stating that she
felt this office building would lower property values and could not
be made to appear to be residential. If developed for office use it
would also increase the traffic and would pose an additional hazard
to children. It would remove the existing noise buffer provided b
the trees and would create litter, drainage and crime problems.
There was no need to procure land in a residential area for an
office building. Other office space in the area had not be utilized
so why build more in their neighborhood.
ad r' °m'?'4 ;?3/ "•s3fi w a.r v € „ a t~.
City of Denton City council minutes
meeting of December 17, 1965
Page Ten
Mr, James C01141na, 2011 Boyd, spoke in opposition stating that the
neighborhood was united against the petition. There were no funds
currently in the budget to eliminate drainage problems caused by the
development and no drainage system was in place. water would have
to be funneled somewhere. There were only 2 streets shown on the
map and if highway 380 were widened to 6 lanes, there would be
traffic problems. The planning and toning commission had voted to
deny the petition and the neighborhood wanted the petition denied.
Mr, Don Wright spoke in opposition stating that his concern was in
ragArd to the parking lot. The US Bank had a similar size parking
lot and for the first few months it was a gathering place for high
school students i, the evenings. Since then, it had been a meeting
place for undesirables which had resulted in litter on the lot as
well as fights. The bank had hired an off-duty police officer to
patrol the parking lot. The parking lot at the proposed office
building would naud to be well lighted to avoid a similar situation.
Mr. Elda M. Bryant, 1911 Shawnee, spoke in opposition stating that
he enjoyed the peace and quiet and felt this development would
create problems for the neighborhood, The traffic was already
increasing and nn office building would only add to the traffic
problem.
Mr. Joe Moore, 1505 Cteck, spoke in opposition stating that his back
yard would join the of'cice building property, any drainage overflow
would be dumpeu on his lot.
Me. Debra Wright, 1513 Creek, spoke in opposition stating that the
Denton Development Guide stated support of older neighborhoods The
Guide had been established in an effort to keep Denton attractive.
Mr. Charles Muirhead, 1502 Greenwood, spoke in opposition stating
that the street had been scheduled to be widened but had not. This
ceva'.opment would only aggravate an existing problem. He was
opposed to spot zoning for this office development.
Ms. June Middleton, 1804 Creek, spoke in opposition staefi g that the
neighborhood was a stable area and that should be considered in the
decision process.
Mr. Paul Wright, 1513 Creek, spoke in opposition stating that he had
purchased a home in the neighborhood 7 monthi ago but would not have
moved to this area if he had known an office building was to be
built.
The Mayor offerea the petitioner 5 minutes for rebuttal.
Mr. Mark Batey, real estate consultant, stated that the traffic
intensity was addressed in the staff report to Council. The traffic
did not have to flow through the neighborrood nor did the drainage.
Retention systems and downstream work would be needed but could be
worked out. Regarding the concerns about the parking lot, this was
not the same situation or location as the US Bank. Another more
suitable use for the property could not be found.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that 13 reply forms had been
mailed with 2 returned in favor and 7 returned in opposition. Some
147 forms had been received in opposition but were not from within
the 200 feet notification area. The tract was located in a low
intensity area and was primarily residential. This area was
currently It over standard basau on existing land use and 227t over
standard based on existing zoning. The Denton Development Guide
limited office use to 4 acre concentrations in a low intensity area
and there currently were 3 acres of office use in the area. If the
additional office building was developed, it would violate the 4
acre rule. On the pro side, access to higher intensity uses Should
i
a
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Kee h nq of December 17, 1985
Page Eleven
• be from Collector streets or larger. Access to this development
would be from Highway 3801 however, staff could not may that no
traffic would ever be funneled through the neighborhood. The site
plan had several positive features. The set-backs of 30 feet were
generous and more than required. Many of the trees on the property
would be retained. Staff had worked with the developer in the
design of the site plan but at no time was the developer assured of
approval by the Planning and toning Commission or the City Council.
Council Member McAdams stated that this was a stable neighborhood
and the development offered nothing to accrue to the neighbors.
McAdams motion, Chew second to deny Z-1779.
Council Member Stephens stated the proposed development would change
the nature of the existing neighborhood,
Council Member Alford stated that Mr. and Mrs. Curry were good
people and he was sure that they did not envision these problems.
Motion to deny carried unanimously.
request of.Miller ofo Texas fort voluntary annexation of o$01.705gacres
situated in the M.E.P. i P.A.R. Survey, Abstract 14701 the E.P,
Anderson Survey, Abstract 161 the E.A. Orr Survey, Abstract 9831 the
G.W, Anderson Survey, Abstract 121 the N.E,P. 6 P.R.A. Survey,
Abstract 15021 and the T i P Survey, Abstract 1302, Denton County,
Texas; being part of a tract known as the Golden Hoof Rench and
beginning south of U.S. Highway 380, east of PM 156, and west of
Egan Road. A-32.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, spoke in favor stating that this was
a voluntary request for annexation. Staff had no additional
information to add. The next action would be the holding of the
second public hearing on January 7, 1986,
Mr. Gerald Mitchell spoke in opposition stating that his land was
contiguous and would like for the Council to request a preliminary
development proposal prior to annexation.
Mayor Stewart suggested that those interested in the development
aspect of the property could attend the Planning and Zoning
Commission meetinys.
Chew motion, Hopkins second to proceed with the annexation process.
Motion carried unanimously.
E. The Council held a public hearing on an ordinance
amending Article 3,07(A) of Chapter 1 of Article III of Appendix A
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas relating to
requirements to be met before beginning construction in new
developments; providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of
$200.00 for violations thereof; and providing for an effective date,
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that the City Engineer had
requested this item for the agenda,
Mayo Pro Tem Hopkins asked how this ordinance differed from the
existing ordinance.
Ellison responded it provided more precise language.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
oy°.~y-•1z`w`r..: ~a..a ~+~"%'4A? Fr; ~ avt B..~1,.: r,m f~•~-: x Pei. ter.,. s~,~TVU h'r"p_`.
City of Denton city council minutes
Meeting of December 11, 1985
Page Twelve
1. The Council considered suoptii?n of an ordinance
amending Article 3.07(A) of Chapter I of Article III of Appendix A
Of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas relating to
requirements to be met before beginning construction in new
developmontal providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of
$200,00 for violations thereof; and providing for an effective date.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-253
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 3.07(A) OF CHAPTER I OF
ARTICLE III OF APPENDIX A OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS TO BE MET
BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION IN NEW DEVELOPMENTBt
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $200.00
FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roil
call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Stephens `aye," Alford
'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stewart 'eye.'
Motion carried unanimously.
F, The Council held a public hearing on an ordinance
amending Chapter 2 of The Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton,
Texas by adding a new Article V to provide for procedures for the
sale of city-owned real property; providing for a severability
clause; and providing for an effective date.
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
David Ellison, Senior Planner, spoke in favor stating that this had
been needed for a long time in order to establish procedures.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Chapter 2 of The Code of Ordinances of the City Of Denton,
Texas by adding a new Article V to provide for procedures for the
sale of ci~:y-owned real property; providing for a severability
clause; and providing for an effective date.
The following orainance wLa presented:
N0. 85-259
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE V TO
PROVIDE FOR PROCEDURES FOR THE SALE OF CITY-OWNED REAL
PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Alford
'aye," Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
G,. The Council held a public hearing on an ordinance
amending Article 29 of Appendix b-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Denton, Texas by raising the maximum fine to
#1,000.00 for violations of the Zoning Ordinance; providing a
severability clause and declaring an effective date.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, spoke in favor stating that the
maximum fine currently was $200.00 and this ordinance would raise
the amount of *1,000.00
City Of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Thirteen
No one spoke in opposition.
The '.,,yor closed the public hearing.
1. The Council consider adoption of an ordinance
amending Article 29 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Denton, Texas by raising the maximum fine to
4loOOD-00 for violations of the Zoninq Ordinancel providing a
severability clause and declaring an effective date.
The following ordinance was presenteds
NO. 85-255
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 29 OF APPENDIX B-ZONING OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY
RAISING THE MAXIMUM FINE TO $1,000 FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCES PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'eye," Hopkins lays,' Stephens "eye," Alford 'aye,'
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
4. Ordinances
The Council moved item 4.J forward in the agenda order.
J. T change uncin considered
zoning re from the adoption agof an ordinance
approving a
ricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 27.29
acre tract at the southeast corner of FM 1830 and Hobson Lane
• 2-1756.
The following ordinance was iresentedt
NO. 65-256
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-11 AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 27.2874 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF F.M. 1830 AND
HOBSON LANE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO
PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM
AGRICULTURAL "A' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATIONS PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY
IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $10000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF!
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye,' Stephens, 'nay,' Alford "aye,'
Riddlesperger 'nay," Chew 'aye," and mayor Stewart 'aye," Motion
carried 5 to 2~ with Council Members Stephens and Riddlesperger
casting the nay votes.
The Council returned to the regular agenda order.
A. The Council co:►sidered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and for the purchase of materials, equipment, sfor the upplies ore services. ntracte
The following ordinance was presented;
•
City Of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Fourteen
NO. 85-257
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, BQi1IPMEM AWARDING
EA
OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFOR91 AND PROVIDING FOR AN CFFECTIVE DATE.
Chdw motion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart 'aye.'
Motion carried unanimously.
B. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
providing for the expenditure o,f funds for purchases of :materials,
equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of
state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive
bids.
The following ordinance was presencedr
NO. 8b-258
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW
EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE
BIDS; AND PPOVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
MCAdama motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens 'aye,' Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "Aye,* Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Chapter 21 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for the
prevention and abatement of litter upon public strestai providing
for a maximum penalty of two hundred dollars (#200.00) for
violations thereof.
The following ordinance was preeented:
NO. 85-259
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING CHAPTER
21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR THE PREVENTION
AND ABATEMENT OF LITTER UPON PUBLIC q =r-"T91 PROVIDING FOR
A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR V;OLATIONS
THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE= AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye," Hopkins "aye,' Stephens 'aye," Alford 'aye,'
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
D, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan instituting annexation of 136.58E acres beginning
approximately 500 feet east of the centerline of U.S. Highway 377
and south of Brush Creek Road, and being part of the George M,
Daugherty Survey, Abstract 351 A-11.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO, 85-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; HPING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY '36.58
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEl.NG PART OF THE GEORGE W.
.,{i` .+~i n:,c ~,z-a9 s. kr++.. n •w.: w* - C's: ?a Fs- °.'~v ,,.,V
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Fiftesn
DAUGHERTY SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 3511 DENTON COUNTY, TEXASI
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'A" DISTRICT PROPERTY;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote McAdams 'aye," Hopkins 0V*1 0 Stephens "aye,' Alford "aye,'
Riddlesperget 'aye," Chew "aye, and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan instituting annexation of approximately 93.67 acres
beginning 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of
U,S. Highway 380 and east of Geesling Road A-13.
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 85-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT GOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 93.67
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE M. FORREST
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417, DENTON COUN"t, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING
THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DIL 'RICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
council member Alford left the meeting.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye,* Hopkins "aye,' Stephens "aye,' Riddlesperger
"aye,' Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart 'aye." Notion carried
unanimously.
• F, The council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan institutinq annexation of approximately 34.68 acres
situated in the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, and beginning
approximately 250 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline
of FM 426, approximately 2,000 feet east of Mayhill Road A-14.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 34.60
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE M. FORREST
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417, DEMTON COUNTY, TEXASI CLASSIFYING
THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A' DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance, on roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Riddlesperger
`aye," Chew says,' and mayor Stewart "aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan, instituting annexation of approximately 42.35 acres
situated in the S. Huizar Survey, Abstract 514, and beginning
approximately 500 test north of and perpendicular to the centerline
of U.S. Highway 380 and west of Masch Branch Road A-15.
The following ordinance was presented:
{
J
a
y x a~ `Y`r "~',~t'6`1.- e ~ .,7'st'.' ra s.'Wl~k >d'x~ 's `s ♦
city of Denton city council minutes
Nesting of December 17, 1905
P"19e Sixteen
NO. 8S-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXANt BEING ALL THAT LOT
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING Ol APPROXIMATELY 44.36
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND 481140 PART OF THE S. NUZZAR
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 514, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING
THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'Al DISTRICT PROPKRTYj AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. on roll
call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Hopkins "aye,' Stephens "aye,' 'aye,"
Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye.' Notion
carried unanimously.
H. The council conaidered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan instituting annexation of approximately 150 acres
situated in the D. Hough Survey, Abstract 646, and beginning rest of
Mayhill Road, approximately 4,000 feet north of 1-35 A-17.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS) BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 150
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE D. HOUGH
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 646p DENTON CGUNTY, TEXABI CLASSIFYING
THE SAM$ AS AGRICULTURAL. "A' DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance, On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Hopkins lays,' Stephens "aye,' Riddlesperger
"aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart 'aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
I. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan instituting annexation o! approximately 60.38 acres
situated in the G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and beginning
ad,acent and east of Edwards Road approximately 1,000 feet east of
Mayhill Road A-18,
T'le following ordinance was presented;
NO. 85-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 60.38
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE G. WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 13300 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS)
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'A" DISTRICT PROPERTY1
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aya," Hopkins 'aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Riddlesperger
"aye,' Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stewart 'aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
K, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Ordinance No. 85-160 to provide for a corrected legal
description of the property thereby rezoned; and providing for an
effective date Z-1759.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that this ordinance was
required to correct the field notes on Z-1759.
'pie
city of Denton city council minutes
meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Seventeen
The following ordinance was presented:
NO, 85-260
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 00. 85-160 TO PROVIDE FOR A
CORRECTED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY THEREBY
REZONED: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATP.
Stephens notion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye,' Stephens 'aye," Riddlesperger
"aye,' Chow 'aye," and Mayor Stewart 'aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
L. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance for
abandonment of easements in Southridge Village Shopping Center.
Ernie Tullos, Assistant Director of utilities, reported that these
were 5 easements, some of which dated back to the 19309x. When the
property was replatted, there was no reason for the City to keep
them.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-261
AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY
EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Riddlesperger
"aye," Chew "aye," and mayor Stewart "aye,' Motion carried
unanimously.
. M. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting the proposal of Arkwright -Boston Insurance Company for
boiler and machinery insurance.
John McGrane, Director of Finance, reported that this was a
reissuance of the current policy. There were some changes such as
the deductible for the turbines had been reduced. The increase in
the rate was in line with ol,her current insurance rates.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-262
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL OF ARKWRIGHT-BOSTON
INSURANCE COMPANY FOR BOILER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR.
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye," Hopkins "aye,' Stephens 'aye,' Riddlesperger
"aye," Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart "aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
51 Resolutions
A. Consider approval of a resolution approving year-end
budget adjustments for Fiscal Year 1984-85.
John McGrane, Director of Finance, reported that this was an audit
housekeeping item.
The following ordinance was resolution was presented:
WPM
City of Denton city Council minutes
Meeting of December,li, 1985
Page Eighteen
M E S 0 L U T I 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
The budget adjustments, as indicated on Exhibit A, attached
hereto and included by reference herein, for the fiscal year 1984-85
are hereby, in all things, approved and ratified.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 17th day of December, 1985.
RICHARD , MIYON
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
HA L T E XLLIP, CITY SECRYM
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO ISGAL FORMS
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
McAdams motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,° Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." motion
carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered approval of a resolution
adopting Six (6) personnel policies:
1. Identification Cards 102.12
2. Employee Fuel Gate Access Cards 102.13
3. Problem Solving 115.02
4. Dress code 108.07
5. Sexual Hnrassment 108.20
6. Death in Family Leave 111.06
Kathryn Usrey, Director of Personnel, reported this was the same
process as before. The first 5 policies were new ones and the
policy on leave for death in the family was a new one in that it had
been expanded to include step-family.
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHERE the Director of the Personnel/~ioployee Relations
Department for the City of Denton has presented proposed policies
regarding employee rules and regulations for the Council's
consideration] and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such policies as
official policies regarding employment with the City=
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
The following policies, attached hereto and made a part
• hereof are hereby adopted as official policies of the City of
Denton, Texas:
ice
City of Denton City council minutes
Meeting of Decunbee 170 1985
Page Nineteen
102.12 Identification Cards
102.13 Employee Fuel/Gate Access Cards
115.02 Problem Solving
10N.07 Dress Code/Personal Appearance
108.10 Sexual Harassment
111.06 Death in Family Leave
SECTION II.
The foregoing policies are Attached hereto and made a part
hereof and shall be filed in the u.ficial records with the City
Secretary.
SECTION III.
The Employee Rules and Regulations Of 1976 adopte- by
Resolution of the City Council on February 1, 1977, are hereby
rescinded to the extent they conflict with the foregoing policies
and with any administrative procedures and directives issued under
the authority of the city Manager implementing the policies hereby
adopted.
SECTION IV.
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 17th day of December, 1985.
RICHARU . S r R
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,/TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Hopkins motion, Stephens second that the resolvt:'on be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens 'aye," '
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
C. The council considered approval of a resolution
reaffirming the goals of the Plus One Program.
Glen Jaspers, Administrative Abststant for the Utility Department,
reported that this item had previously been before the Council.
There had been renewed interest and activity with the Plus One
Program and the Public Utilities Board and staff felt it was
worthwhile to bring it back before the Council for a reaffirmation.
Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked how ;,uch money had been collected for
this project during the last year.
i
Jaspers responded approximately $10,000.
John McGrane, Director of Finance, reported that advertisement would
be done to remind citizens of the program and its function,
C'+.' ~-~.s .F ~y. ~ -~.r-., x.. t. ~ xt.T; '.~,n w'N:= ...~.r, P,,fw1
City of Denton City Council minutes
meeting of December 17, 1985
Page 'Awenty
. The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the "Plus One" program sponLiored by the City of
Denton has in the past provided needed energy assistance relief to
citizens: and
WHEREAS, the objectives of "Plus One* progr+.m are. held in
high esteem by the Pe,blic Utilities Board anal City Council, NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TLXAS, THAT:
' SECTION I.
The City Council does heraby reaffirm and pledge its
renewed commitment to the "Plus Ono" program to provide charitable
energy assistance re?,ief to City of Denton residents who meet
established eligibilit;t requirements,
SECTION II.
The City Council does pledge its support to the development
of neif and innovative programs designed to provide energy assistance
relief to qualified Denton citizens, which meet legal and Charter
requirements.
PASSED AND APPRO'+ED this 17th day of, December, 1985.
RICHARD . STEWARTp MAYOR
CITY OF CENTON, TEXAS
. ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALL ENO CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF :ENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Hopkins motion, Ridalesperger second that the resolution be
approvad. On roll' call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins 'aye,* Stephens
"aye," Riddlespel'gtlr "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered approval of a resolution
authorizing the City Manager to make payment to Delhi Gas Pipeline
corporation in connection with the relocation of certain pipelines
and facilities.
Acting City Manager Rick Svehla reported that the resolution would
authorize payment to Delhi Gas Pipeline Corporation. Once this was
accomplished, plans could proceed for the extension of Loop 288.
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, on July 25. 1978, the City of Denton entered into
a contract with the Texas Department of Highway's and Public
Transportation to procure right-of-way for Lhe extension of Highway
Loop No. 288 from the present north terminus of U.S. Highway 360,
north and west to Interstate Highway 351 and
a
a
City of Denton city council minutes
Hosting o; December 17, 1985
Page Twenty-one
WHEREAS, pursuant to the acquisition of such right-of-way,
it is necessary that Delhi Gas Pipeline Corporation relocate certain
pipelines and facilities] and
WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Highways and Public
Transportation has approved a contract between Delhi Gas Pipeline
Corporation and Gulf Interstate Engineering Company in the amount of
$57,492,28 for Gulf to perform engineering consulting services in
connection with Delhi's relocation of utilities, including the
preparation of construction drawings, surveys and project cost
estimatesi alid
WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Highways and Public
Transportation has agreed to reimburse the City of Denton 90 percent
of the Delhi/Gulf contract cost after the City has paid Delhi's cost
for the samet
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City manager is hereby authorized, in accordance
with the City's contract with the State Department of H.ghways and
Public Trtinsportation for the extension of Highway No. Loop 288, to
make payment to Clelhi Gas Pipeline Corporation for its actual costs
incurred under ito contract with Gulf Interstate Engineering Company
for engineering consulting services iii an amount not to exceed
$57,492.28, the actual costs to be submitted,- determined and p:id to
Delhi as the work progresses upon receipt by the City of invoices
from Gulf to Delhi.
SECTIUN II,
. That this Resolution shall become effective immediately
upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 17th day of December, 1985,
"IC ARD 0, STE ART, MA
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEto4':
CH R OTTE A LEN, CITY SECRET
ARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
McAdams motion, Chew second that the res,)lution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye,• Hopkins "aye,• Stephens 'aye,'
Riddlesperger 'aye,• Chew "aye,' and Mayor Stewart "aye,' Motion
carried unanimously.
6• There was no official action on Executive Session items of
legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments.
7. The following items of New Businoss were suggested by
Council Members for future agendas:
a. Council Member Stephens stated that he had received a li
communication from the Historic Landmark Commission regarding a
'°~s ,F-i • .^:4e n". .f _ 'Ati ' k5, Y`,: :A IV
City of De.iton City council minutes
Meeting of December 17, 1985
Page Twenty-Two
proposed tree preservation ordinance and requested that this be
placed on the January 7 agenda for discussion.
b, Council Member Stephens requested the city Attorney to
prepare a written statement regarding the ruling that Mr. tscue was
out of order during the public hearing during this Council meeting.
c. Council Member Riddlesperger requested the City Attorney
research ordinances from other cities which limit/prohibit smoking
in public places and to prepare a draft ordinance for Denton.
a. The council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
AICHUIY-
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY-S-BUFTM
i
llaej
.r
VATS: 1/21/86
CITY COUNCIL REPOT FORMAT elf, i6,
TO: Mayor and Members of the City council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Chad Miller Addition, Lot 1, Block 1
Preliminary and Final Replat of the Snider Addition,
Section II, Lots 1, 2, 30 20, 21, 22 and 23, Block 6
Preliminary and Final Replat of Mrs. McKennon's Addition,
Lot 6, Block 1
Preliminary and Final Replat of the Northside Addition,
Lot 6, Block 1
Preliminary and Final Replat of the Golden Triangle
Industrial Park Addition, Phase V, Lot 2, Block I
Preliminary Plat of the Cumberland Presbyterian Children's
Home Addition, Lot 1, Block 1
R ~O999NDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission,at L , meetingfof
January 8, 1986, recommenced that the above listed plats
and replats be approlred.
SUMMARY:
BACKGROUND:
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS 4YFECTED:
FISCAL IMPACT:
Re ec ully ub itted:
o- A
i e
Prepared by:
Denise pi y
Urban Planner
Appr red:
Diracto o
and Cosamity Ownlopment
i w- -
2el~ _i mu ffi
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 210 1986
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Chad Miller Addition,
Lot 1, Block 1
SUMMARY: This tract is 0.1 acres located on the west side
of Austin Street, 125 feet south of Oakland
Street. This tract is shown in the B.B.B. and
C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 185, Denton,
Texas. The property is zoned multi-family
(MF-1), and multi-family development is
anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ATTACHMENTS: Reduced plat
Denise S iWA4
v y
Urban Planner
00600/1
z
'iii I t / i
W AUSTIN
s • ~ .1
~ ~TRCtr oc I , ' ~ i ~ ,
' ~ wttpnr wr
ti,
cxistIN I \ F I
BE I 'I I !f
I
B I i:, ~ 6 V
i ,
ACRE-.167
R08ERT G 9TQRRIE t ) WRTIB BAOLCj,!& S'
t m:~ URLAIN
MF-I ONlNG-MF•1 M -1 !j
QTY a wry (w WRY* TH%At
ALLIE MN ER LOT It BLK4 CHAD MILLER A00moN
OWNER: ALLIE MILLER
.I IOfR.BL W)w4w
1
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOT 6 SDI, AO
MVOL.1113 PAGE JO A DEEORECCRD
BURKE ENGINEERING
4s
i '
I ~I t. DATC• FI/~ltM
VLu Ljc
v
Y
.
. gg
ZIMP
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 21, 19b6
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Replat.s of the Snider
Addition, Section II, Lots 1, 2, 31 20, 21, 22,
and 23. Block 6
SUMMARY: This tract is 1,06 acres located at the
northeast corner of Brooke and Gardenview
Streets. This tract is shown in the B,B,B. and
C.R,R, Company Survey, Abstract 186, Denton,
Texas. The property is zoned planned
development (PD-63), and single-family
development is anticipated,
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available,
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
The purpose of the replat is to correct several
errors in the bearings and distances on the plat.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replats
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ATTACHMENTS: Reduced plat
,
J~
hLUN u .
Denise S ve?
Urban Planner
00600/2
iree; 144)1't.1
w
t ► to w at Ww6, mm- Implant
• / •RURIt ICAtt
Rtt C nt rCCt
w
3 R 1 rt
111 101
• trRrt RAtA
of
7e C~
W t t ~ ' of to aN• tf•
r lol tltr MAP, Rt! u tw uaw ~i•w•~ aIN M•w•Ir
I I it t. ♦ of t l • iM' iia' w w a' •'w~ ' m•s.
it 6
I R 1t Ir"' RI R t0 R Ir RN
Via
1 LOSS
ZONMi PO-63
• t C D Or +jj1. j1. P. R .walhmmo `wrl'n 611406041 . i ~'.1►r i,~lx'i
r 1041
am" NMI
k. tu.... w' me Poor flow Wa,
twww tlr yYm fm Vitt of low Iwtlrw,
f: M aolte.wwf Wyw. .
1, tw••.Mt•t Not" to.".
i
, I
%w.. C • 1
PRELM"Y REPL.AT
SMDER ADDITION
an r 6dlt3M, m 1
SURn MOWN"
tlifrtON. Tt1tAR tRffl Rq-titN
na.emus am- Brat or
I' 11~f~~I(L~10
I is' bill
ON It
i H ,141
a,l s pROOxE $
TA o
Lot
1, 1.1, 41- '
or 6 Zia'
IN. lI1~N w , 'Wt'
s~f/l1~ IA, aNInM w+ CURVE IATA ~
Vito of 11 YA, • : In tt111i N4 `0~(,4~1 ~.'I'. iwN ~,.••i
If ~.M►e
0 1 111 Y •1vN If! qa 01' of f, 111•Ii'r1't
,r i
4 N Z !t t J' ~ , , 1 - IIA Je' N• li r .,r H ✓ 1 y
r ._.i ^ if...l'p II rl ....1 1,
11 M!,'H' •OM 11'1,'1
raA 6
it' 1$ u vl tk ti r r+r~ II t 1' 10! Y~~1{ 100
w 41'r_
r fVlwdlf Ive,_.*_tlf I_ S__.
d
1 4 1 { I toe 1 0 •A1{•. U4. 144, In, NM M .111 M of 41 NI w
is 1,+.411, y4A 1111 "I"', ,N 1MWItl4N 41Ai11
,1, IfN114rYr,1
I ~ ~ $ N, O E t0r1~4,
..I ,..r 1t L..,
<nn nr nrt: '
r I Vol It 14 ant
"Ir I n
wom", •.\IMt M1'llllr'1141 I; Ml 11 IN Wrl t 111 11„' rn/Illn Ila:l 1111 fC1'. 1.1111 IYI ~ MI ,.•1 rllh 1!Y I.Ir1 11"+1 !..11
rf Irnl allnJtN In 11✓ 1,'.L f, tllllln.l fn TMl III... p
❑r 11 x11 1r11M.'1 I. +1 II'.: i t.q tr p Ir v\ h A I'. 11-1 rn.r pl r
il I.,. )
Ir.r [III Ot ,V111MI II of f.nml v;, .rr I.1 fllnr a' nl nr. Irl111 :1•,!11 rl'IN11,I It.". It, Ilw..
.I )~Ir, 1.1111.1'., I1..I
eN )I In 11Mh I. vl 1,11.1 bN l '..I nl 1.+. ,1.nw 1r n.' N11 r, , r \L'a Ir.1 - .-I Vr A. Nrr••r rrn11
1 rfo•+I rMnMW In fN•L~1 t 111 11 r 11. I,
I", ••„1 II r11 fn.IM Cnrnl 1111111 P,111. rl r n' - 1 Ja W,1 YIIA I4. +..in I;r• wl In1f r 1 Ir.+ • 1 •rl+ r r I.n ntw•I It'll
+rl.: II b;1M1 if Ml YhrC n1•' pVll'M NIr A-+1111 !1 In 11nN1 1-11 o t , 1 Ir +4111, lu~•-1 I ,b. 1 11.1 v♦ nl 11 • /.a lw 'HI ro IIMW 'wl•f
AIt H11wr
/Pil""1'N IN 11N 1TrI M'N f.N n'r of III vl Ir r d•y. r4 •J y`L1 IL' HVI P1 p r 1111YI W tnl In ''R Ptw\ .1 lln lr b s,. 1.... • a`. r'r n n..
pr l)n r..rr wl Ilr [III M Nw1 M.IP II.
0,11 ax
Ifw11^1 r1 qr tn•1t4v,1 fnpx'1 YI 11...11.1 Int I xw Yn' b0. 14Nf f al _
I`n ll.,n1 Y•!IM n1 11+' 4lr 111 llnn r.l ';1+1,4.1^.'llrnl .111111w 1.1\I IIM 1111 ~,n „r 1'11.
nl r+ 11 ba 11
' III. IL1'J tI 11 x- _ '1)11
1111a[1.dW 41 N1, 1'rlror n., 111n1 vIA 1'+fnl llnr of b..A+ r4,~r
b Mfl 1,., I r• Y.0 IlM of 11.1 1 I, 1._1 d f "'If 1.1 1, an 111+, 111 11 1ltf %1 1 .1'x1 411 - t r.v 1•q1 1'll fl .L.Ir•1'Y/ I`+ '4j
IN MIIn.1M of . nHaw In 1 1114 1 Hwf a r allnl nl )'S, rl f .11 1 1 1 1 ♦J+d n n rl, , 1 . 1 . Ir. ,T 1111 1/a aN 7» U1Yl •
nl r•Ile {I afvgfl, 0,. 41 Ibr: 11 11 elr .I•I 11 Ir .'..n, In be f.'ar, rll ay wl I, fAf~•I
jHVr iqv+aaf 1111 t'Ial lhrlnl. r11h IM /.1U 11w of h'+.`e r11 r..1 wl, vIP1 n. ...I n.c q. glra,r 1n 11... ; - 1 1....1 r'•, ,....r flJ.r...f .Ya ra /d.lv
Mr
In Jm oM,ll. n1 1:1.01 1•••1 ! /MI MAIM ,m le 1x,•1.nF wn Lx ~i
W 111 ~lr Wm✓.1 S.',y. r 41.uwn M I!l. nl III I 1 1.. rA 11M ^•4I••~~
rW p nW wY -oJ r•I 11M. n 111 rn11+ nA 11r. 11 0..,,, It I
ry I•'r oar loll 1 rMlm wr y, 11.+11 C•,~»,~„~„`~l'.,, -
1M)f 1m rN.•Lflt Y1W Ib v. ,l Ilea .,r 11.1 . I,t .1 i.wt I". MW ..nln :1.1 m till, nr•.11 ..1 ..11. A E Y t A T
n+ u• LM,Ih of 1A„+f Ir..l f +1.114 f-a'1•r .+l to : nrv.'r xl Nr+'nrr r~ r~ 1y C J1
N YHM, ta•1 A 4 11anr of M,,1 F.", I In » vYI 4A It p.r .W wl :•r M
CO♦ 1 S I , Z 3 LD C If 1~ G
L a 3
la1 nn,1 ant IM ML1MInd of o ♦JI-I r4 •nl born In 1M Irh MPlnr • IaA1N "r'xf ` , 'm M1•IP•'1'•' 1 i 1 .r r . q I 1 ..r1
x1111. 11 11. tw1,n'. 111\',M'uel l.~b,11 n1.r11.1,•1 1Iwrl I•.11+',bN-^n~.1
. .rn.. 11.. 11.n IN. f°I•". la rl r..l W 41....1:-.I 4' m in11 r+ . arrf P..1 BLOCK ' 6
141 r 1... f....... ,.1 r..• 1I „ I , ..1 ...1 I, 1,•.. . , ..4..,n of, 11.11 .1rfl IIh 111. I+M Ilo nl ".h dr trrl »I 1 411ti \.IA <wre
SNIDER ADDITION ,A Jff Ir+Rl )III) f\rf I r4n4 loIM, Ff no r"frMl t'1 lwnrrl 51
••w, 11 1 141If .'Mr If 11.11 1-1 111, » If 1-111 IIN 1n, 111. 11 (1111 of r.,1 l„ny 'x I'llI LAl, Vol A •^111, , SECTION TWO
1^r fa be Ill 1,t'lMnr rnr~., y P••w•e•14 A4. nl..l u.1111
' CITY a COUNTY OF DEM'lON
)'r of vnH M IWIrr1 4r 411.x.ra a ..I. I•n M14 1 r v..n. llwl M ,r,
H1•a 41,
11.N4n. '•1 Inl.ll lw.q L.p 111'•. rwl a11M .W llr pl,l.ow, 1 M .a..r 1•Id• r.l 1r .I~~ 4af
- 1' tYIY[f{111
.I ..11, nr1 y. / 0. OOR NO
Of NT.OY, itkAJ 7~t01
1A,«N 111 Of Stt•ttl!
01
v r
`•Y:Y
y
Cal
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 21, 3.986
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Replatn of Mrs. McKennon's
Addition, Lot 6, Block 1
SUMMARY: This tract is 0.23 acres located on the north
side of Hickory Street, 163 feet west of Denton
Street. This tract is shown in the William
Aeill Survey, Abstract 971, Denton, Texas. The
property is zoned multi-family (MF-I), and
multi-family development is anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
The purpose of the replat is to relocate a lot
line.
ACTION REQUIRED: Appxoval of the preliminary and final replats
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Ccrnmission recommends
approval.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
en se ` y
Urban Planner.
00600/4
9
eF-'7 MF-y •1
My f✓rNNNiIN \N. YffNM RO WTTNKI
• N q NwMp r0777~q ~ ~ eCALt (y!0'
r aa0ar0 ! 4000" To RAT or
Alut0i+o00 !AWN".
al MF-I W-1 MF•I I
LOT • I VIOIWITY MAP
6.eT T R A00111" DoT e
. sArl NOIO 1.1 it N'MR
AA~YiI/N Y r' from" an
101, Re6, e0e
40
, LJIiNYMA
w J I
/1Y
VOIR W
lilaM'f 1. MMTfV t
/ b F1 TWK A019 MAW MAXM
6 CRUM" a TOPOORAlItY
.M
is
R
j
NICXOW 00, cx IM' ' mwhw ma
v '
Cayes OC1IV* •RCIJMNMY RAT <::>< GURKE ENGINEERNG R(YIeg11e'
MRS. MCKENNON' S A D eNtT
owner JAMES RUSSELL- WIL KING m LOCUST, QUM IN
or qT/ a COUNTY Of UeNTON,T£%M lenF ml • eefl OLMfoN, Te11AS MCI M'. OW "N
i
11111. M 911AI,
III ( rMRrry or IX1rTml
r{ I C 10 to RIII 00 10111RFAK, pill hill 1. o,oi 1111711 jJ*r,
.rlr 11,. nunwl\ A, 4ll fir rr1111n
~y7 + 1li. UCt 01 1141 nl.u 1'A O In n IPI` 0117141 an S'rl/ vn1 A1uA rl h,N.1 9fE L1
• I Cllr 1,1 7wnI Mr1 trnl:w Mwr,, L 1.1. Iml • p.lll ,l Int h of !M S.
1' Y^16~WS'S AM.1171M In loll or.. .r 1. at a. coma, br ILn p141 ll.r,tor te•
6 R A I M!C 1 C A L t carton In V.1,1rv J FAAn .14 1,1 11+ wr.1 r. r•qf. of IwMm, r... a,N, Tew%, A"
A _ h IX 11117 M'IM4 111 of ILa r.Illod q,:r '1, IInr1 Ill.I rL,\I to ILr Iwool Isla Cost, FAle/ 16
- d 14'TK F. rl'iol I1, ANl Iltrl of so. IP1. roc.,, h.; lu ,'a l'wi Ihip rAfn )•,1 1,r ltm LAIR
..A Iron, .I•. 1,... ..,"111' "I" 6-.or ••I" ull. n.l.ltl Aru
'V
•~lAld r/i 111fuu.lyyy 1' r Y llm,l 1. fnl lnu.r
0 ~ i II I rI.SIP:I1f. Inc 1h^'.rv1ILw r..1b1 1,l 41,1 11...1 h,lnr 01" 11 I'll LrMIn. At au
Q11sI Il.m I'd I..'" :I
. Ibr I.rn... 'I" vrld Ina 6, uA bl
M " n rnrnr, Lal•16 In tr'r rrrnrnlnY tnl1,i If.,. 1,l l',•µ Nlrbll, Nt"'t,
1rwR411µµI
41. N
AA[RLOR
i•- we 41U11R+IL
•`_11-1 _..~IrOr( Ir v lop fit 10"? Ve01 11116[1 Fnl l1, lup lu^rl:+f 114 'N..d n. lop •er ^..I. U1111 vlth lop, rrtor,Alled nrlt
FA 4l CA Rrf RI[A-. Ilnr A It U Anl IM 1'411 I,1,. ,.I rnl r .i 411:,1 nnrl of 1541•X9 feel to a
V 1 C 1 Al I T Y M A F V.Ut 1 I1! 114.olrrl 'A' fa.tml in Inc InI. -1 . A 1.11 lot Ili. Rmil,lroll Cnlnrr of Ibr
RO ICAAL i. • ,Q ,y rpy 7.nsa M! 14 laid K'45114 ahd IIK 11.1111
Srgslope
11I1LhYr. fall el In III, 11CgAlIr.1 ",I'. fit,, u' lr.r sAid 01 '45JI 1. aM Rite TrArl A
AItII 11 N ANAIMII d1t RRwe if II fool In A no rFA'V" f ...m-0 In I1,^ lop at a rook uAl1 (nor IM
Anrlh*hol Impostor of Ihn uIff H".'.r rl aM Plot, fl A,rl
WILL 1 A M NEIL A. SURVEY mt+rr t.r,ts lM m rroel tm " r .r. . rA1t .llh ri,n rrra6n,,.d rlu Ian.
I( Ina lAI4 flrrA,J. Ana tow. II off'' '1 it., P11,1101 Will, Ill. anal Ilne of too
tall UI 6 A Alntar to AI Y,n.P• 11.11 In nn I.,N rod fatlnl At I10 ternr,.lted Saturn-
wit Corner or arm ,for LU•Lll 1. A^I /If4 it its, ballot in the Faith Iine or Inc A7,we.
nAnNmM t1Ue'1 I
.S TIILYCC 6--t Yft', U.A "1tol Ilow I t6^ It 1 1111-1 A dial woo
A 9 S T R A C T N O 9 7 f 1,x rt A• L 1,1 Arr.• 1,l 1,,r n L, .=r n. n.. 1,r I Ina. of 6l. u1, lone is
L,':N: All "J'1 'A' la•.'1 Irr J":
dl split us, !r•v. rln.rrl, 1. ,1 Ir1r1 t1. tl,l,, hr n1r Ad.ry-l till. plAl ,IoVI,,,llnf
ek In,. I.AtrlLrd r. I,rtll ,l put ,l I'll 1. flo<u 1, 110,, 4rLmOU•S
,119.If1dS In ,Le fall .'1 I+now. 11 Ao,. . 111.41 And J'r',,IIL,v doJ It \tI le ln0
p~.oll re UM Ia.•r%or tole 111111 II11'A r•^I •v u. ,.I P"bl lc eAl.q,•nll IMxnl!,Irm".
REPLAT OF PART OF ^
OrORdr R /1011 ROSA 1 Lrrnlal
r III c ud LOT 4 BLOCK I v A U. rrA,
MRS, MOKENNON'B !A"1: Acv. n.-lrrul. L cn;
A001 T ION STATr nr TrrAS
CtH':Tf or tr91n\
0.280 ACRE ptsl IK, role bndrr.lrooq •>.I 1,r r; IJr r, ..1 far Ill'I Cw,n'v and cute on
rb W tU tide dal rerlnnAl ll' Apr" 114._-_..,,... - . brl-I f.. en t1 L1 Ir.1
pm Iron yr.al• aa.r it 4d,p f.S-•I I, IIr r,pryn.1,r Vollran 1,l I,.: Jtolnuir4rei
1.I' fl :i. • t.!,; li (1 )f ' 8,} 7 (Y le pool loll heJlh^/!!.^r 1,l^r.rt^n Y.^ 1. for 1'.1, fooar1,r 191 r^n N<11AIInn
O r 1. i+ l l Q 41.1101", 01rN11rA, An -1 In u., r...e•I 1'1_o .',,rrAl
r,
fl ° Lt n a tnr•; ,;me on rs•.n A•.. ann.
11, or
g
44 q )•11\' "1•.111 In lr^'1 ..r ..I 1.•
13
I• t
li ao' .",..l o.lm fy.tn til
W '711, 1'I Tlcas
.0. 8. k q,p'111 411 1.1•.14,;
'
.
Pro , r,\ I
L fl hl"I ''I, 1,.. ,u. t.l rlrn.~A ,rv Inc +.11.1 r;muR .,1,A rut' on
or t-.I1 d1„ "1111,..11 to Ipl'• a...i inn." In IV t• h. Ile
WLfT 1-1'11, Plot". 1,.+w- I. •4l. I'.! - f, I,, , 11. lu.Inrrn' nn-0 arrnnul
. . w 413.0 1~^ • In n Ihll 1.1 (.•.rth^r •e .r r,. ^ r.nlr And rnr 'CeA
WI n.^, ran r.nr,. ..1. lend In^n... , r. ,rn•,.tr „1.11111 inn
ri rl IN t•. 4,R '1Y I, I ..I, , ISR1r
WEST HICKORY STREET \rt.11."1'111
to' R, o. or, rwf . k11 A M PART OF LOT 6 ,BLOCK I
RS. MIKE NNON'S
j'~'14 141Af AI.I. !R'Y AY 111651: IAJ"IINhl1
"iltl............... , a' TXA1 li 1411111,1171. .I, if XIrr., raid il' ..of l of Moo d4 fill^I rrlllfr •.•'ll Ihll A 1 DDITION
plot. IrAA pr eparrd h1,. An 40 An1"Al 1111 I. . Ill, 1,r .,NVr ar d.• IA "I ,1,A uVA1 I;.
•,•41'AI .~.,~j RwM'+nNfr tha h.InaN wan ImNN III pli.-A NrHnf w dltlrlbm 1n.1 luyrvl Al"
CITY OF 0£NTON
d'4M11•, 111 In A.vmdalNS Irllh floor XrAlnAnrr. 1,1 L1..1 011' .f I+•xlnn, TYe H.
K OENTON COUNTY TEXAS
Lar 1'. P.r N Oat 0a a 10 0 a
Xlrherl J. Iryn No to S, hA. FISA..•«~• jylr..•_. da1RY of: mot COLEMA1f 0 ASSOC1AT
r' ro' fIJRvE 1111x/
1 11 N t.'1, 0 tOK AO~
• uarw rl pt[frfOMA T11RA1 t{~/
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 21, 1966
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Replats of the Northside
Addition, Lots 10 and 11, Block 2
SUMMARY: This tract is 0.2 acres located on the west side
of North Elni Street, 10U feet south of College
Street. This tract is shown in the B.B.B. and
C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 185, Denton,
Texas. The property it zoned office (0), and
multi-family development is anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
ACTION REQUIRED- Approval of the preliminary and final replats
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommenda
approval.
ATTACHMENTS: Reduced plat
L'
Deniue Si v
Urban Planner
0060o/3
a
{ y i fi s,tln I
~ i
a .;r - ALLEY AS OCG1f O l , ~xl I +ti
IF M. I l••~_ _
1!!!jjj' 1111
9-29-85
~w
ALLEY AJOWMALLY
a 1
VIMNl !y zLwtO ztL0 FILE fLATTCO
.y1 zO LAT 6 ze fl
b CITYa Y 0~ CENTOII, rIxis c7
AC'S Q.202 ALLM MILLER I ! STATE FARM
I 1
ZONINGS OFFICE J, r
~ ww r w.wnw N,r MO
I
Nw,M• Y`II Nam Ir1Y Y'IIN Nr,M1M,lIIWrI
I I II
If o I 11? j ~I l1 I
owrrt~R I
'~LTrIIRR u W KING ~Cj r i
REPLAT OFD LOT it AND NORTH I
HALF Of LOT 10i BLOCK 2 f ,
NOM SIDE ACW'fM AS RECORDED
IN VOL. 4 FA09 E• DEED RE40RD a za' t n. i I
• ~ i I
UDI2~ Ni.M i 1
_T
BURKE ENGINEERING
aIpAM awaE, P.R.
I
CCNItLRT1Ata CIVIL tNCINfla Ilr'4 i, w,~. ...t ILmm~
a~rIrRNW MMaN•NN
1 U
Iw N~YA'
DEC 0 4 1965
11 ' l 111 "I
'lalr YI Irtl.
r"rl I r1a r,
lYl r'ly In•nf II' .II ~ wl nr 11,r 1111 H.1 1• I•• 1.1,
rlSl+.N t I/Ir^rr Ire. r ,IIrr 'r. , ~ ' .11 1.5 rn 11 F+r ' x111 ni11 •1 I.nlnn, I.III/
$TIY~ ;r,Fy ~I i~ ♦a y. l.( lu_. 111 •.r 1,.1111•.p.l I•, I1. ,1 , 1,_Il:r •I •.I I•', Ilbl 1 nr Ir. \IIIIt
1 ' In 1 11 I - I,a 1 la 1 r r 0 I r..nn. e
yy ° j\Ml \ f A.1+~ 0 t} '/0 100 1. '1 f I I „r r r 1 l 1 1 1, t p.H 1 1 ]•rl /1
•w~. fy!`~ II „I N 1 1 11 1 1 , 1 IIl -t - H r 1 L II/ 11 \IS . 1 II rr . 1
KF d `,_y.'1[ Pq r r I I I I 1 1 1 V 11 , w 1 -1 n r I 1. a
Src/ ~ L.. . _-•W r l+ Ir I rl1 Hi l 4 Y 1 t 1 l hM 1 I 1
.1^•l}V-k I
•t 1Mryt 1 6 11 41r1[ /t llt 1 T I Anl 1 Lr Inl IIIS I,I IICw 4
1
• .fl 1~ If / 1 v r I I1 11111 1 1 II
1 I 11 latf 1 r :wr 1 ..r J rl 1 1 Mu I 1 i. b 1 p IrM rA V
M'll I_• ~I+/ ~YI' }~I 11/' ..1, ••rl. r • is •..r ,r1.. .,.vN a/Il ll•. nl •.^II/
+nwl . Y'}. a l'' r
~r~„w ~ I 1, v,._'I , ,r.._~ ,.rr/.. :I Y rc,1. I. .l I ~ . \I•.• 1.....11.11 r • Iln. n, I•.
T lil t.t 11, Yr Iw.l llrr l'I, I1.. 'r . ~.t I w.l •`I I • Irll In,r `IV S/11I, 1`• 41l
..1_l ~.r f L'•!, m .w 1.1 Ir ,I 14n -r Ills.. • vl I•.. In11H• 11 i•111e~. lq
.I1. r plll n. It iLI L~. I•• . II r. r.l I/I,u V. rw.Mwl`t t+r •'1 nl H. wr•
H Inty
Ylt IMIt 1 If 1► C Q E a w E ,111 •rl ,
of, It"f l In• •
nm ♦1 rv......, 'r1,~V, , nyl , N, 1 Ibn q..µv r,l
y S THE E T 1
_ 11• /I 1•.1.1. ,.t 1 ' • 1 fll
t at•.rl •.•r.r .r•Ir.. l.• rl•/ w1 Vr111^ nl //`r. Ir ln1
r Ir l•• Ir1411!I.r11
' r•'t t. r 1 n ....r , . 11 t'. i lenl ` rr 11 /I
.ly I e vl rnt I l Inl r
+111, I 111. 11. rl h• I.. rl Ill,' .w. II /
' I ~t l• n l`I I /I/1'w y•~ 11 • 4
• a-r -I••L /.1! 1,.. 1111
1. r .I q\ 1. •'lr 1l. n,l„ er el'. 1 / ..4 Ir.. r .1 ..I n .1
t1f ra .r, 11'. ,Iryr nl "1'.Il.t i r .
nl^ •I 11a'
/D
lun .\ryp1 N\
rt /r011 • 101 1
I a L►Q~ I
1 1 r r r
II)r ff
o `J! rlY 111'N•1 17/IE• 1
II 1 •J Y / IQ
1 l ~ r
LOT IIR 19LOCK 2
NORTHSIDE ADDITION a
~ N
o o.:fss u 2
1' t f!' f Is rl, off r 11 ..,I.
1 I~ - of, I IF I} s 1 ter.
J ~ ~urll YµlI1/
1 ' 11/1 11J1 "
III ~ 7 L,._
.._..__.v__.._ REPLAY OF
LOT 11R ,BLOCK 2
m NORTHSIDE ADDITION
fr f;, r.^+u.••1•. lr r1,1, CITY OF DENTON
_~1(1l•~~ DENTON COUNTY 1 TEXAS
1/ y,r 1 1. I vlltllll I 11. I
i' 4.1111 .H rrr lrr , 1 1 IP H 1. I1~11 H1...10 /1
5'i'i rl '11tH 1•n.r bar. 11 L\ • •1i' C0t 1MAof a AI10c II t[1
''h•In'Nir , / 1i. 1 Iln_ /YA Y[Y}M1
:,'t i•aj\• rw:rr•. lfbr Ilr 1 ! 0 sox •01
•w' G1~IIt 1. in r l F l' JN :[.JU II '_-~I, 011 too, T[[A/ Mot
off. 1111S. off$
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK--UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Replats of The Golden
Triangle Industrial Park, Phase V, Lots 2C and
2D, Block 1
SUMMARY: This tract is 2.9 acres located on the northeast
corner of Kimberly Drive and Morse Street. This
tract is shown in the M.E.P. and P,R.R. Company
Survey, Abstract 927, Denton, Texas. The
property is zoned light industrial (LI), and
office/industrial development is anticipated.
city services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations,
The purpose of the replat is to subdivide a
large lot into two smaller lots.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replats
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
D 1ise S44 yy
Urban Planner
0060o/5
its
pf'swAsrow
ZONED PD41
I
1 lee.t~
VICMTY KA►
TAACT I TAavOTt
I.914 ACII I.M ACS ;~T~`r•"'f
y1 WM M i
LOT 2
BLOCK I
~h b
pRELOAW RY REPLAT
LOT 2C 6 M BLOCK
tbt-~-= ramm TPldWU INDUSTRIAL PARK ADOITKkI
4 c L • wt la
"t~TreMAA vll , "MATES
. t
ORSE STREET - S ALMS IM TIM CITY S COWTV or ocNTal Tow
BURKE ENGINEERING
ORION Dome. 01-IL
co"Mma elvft dwell
M, InyK 1 M.HM.IfW «IIIMMMN
OECLIISOII to, lose
f IJJf
I "•1~ 11 I'n
It
\1 '.1111 N 10 l V
0 {0 t00 700 100 n 1i I.H •1
r ~ -1 AI°nll.r ;'I'1. 1nIP uno 1.u . II I1... r.rl .•1 •111!11 frlul• Irlel M
Ir 111' IV"• Y. \ r. 4.I IInH Ir.y 1..1 1r.1 .4111 r1114r1Mn JI
p 1 r u.1.r. • . 1., au•, r.hwp+. 1 Mrl r1. tnl 1r .I«\ I• fwla4 It Ifw11. 14•
1 1~ OIA►M It 6 C4 1. 1 i,.b111 rnq 1... rnrnaIn IIIr +11rn.M U.r"nn 1w Hu
1.4 ~~y~ / 11 IY II f 1 Ir,nrg r •r•,r1 1 Iri...r ' .11 V I1. n1. r1.. t1. It lnnlli n1. F4Vi fMllr
r~j.~l~l~l }.n 11'- 1-1 1•'•.. ..•I r1. .'rr ,1'r"rl rr ll r •III4r.l fl r.ll~fl
too I Ir.r rlr. w ..,.....:..Ir .•.r rrr .r nr. a.n I.nf 411nIN4 Wool.. it
1 . Ilnr 1.1 b'rvl n •'r u•ro.rln4 1.M11rv1 Lxnn H 1114 41 1. II IM
l•~' ~r ,•'lIA Ilr rf 'w.•r •v. 1, 1111 rM .In ln.I.,1 IM /N1•nu1 farr J
1 ate. 1 Ln Ir nf., 1 .r wF. blrri Ir' .u110 .'1 lu,r IIJp 11 n Innw M IAr
y Ir• 1.,1• na irolbl
rat d.. x'01 ~`.1 rnl u.l•_I Lr,i'ri I4 r r, .I ri Plot
Ix'4n n, ,1 1..r••-• U 4'wgn 111owN 1.11 Ni IY al yYlr.4 ,44 a•
r.1. r1 u . N 14• all l •J ! I Al u.1n r wr H 4 H f v l u 411 b r M
V I t I M I f T Y AP
66 Hltf 1+:+1 . 'rly^ n• yr r.1. + ...A L.r „ wr 41M PI •M'MHI Iwr•
.rr n1. r. , r.r.e 1.11.•1 I,r II
INI \•.I \w1411 n 1111. r. 11 4 r.rl. r•I 4I1! IN Ir[K1I 0.1 •'r l♦
Ilnr N r .r111~1•r 1.NIY'rn n1. IILM1r Lml M M IIM IM LoM N IM
Yf►NN ►f I1. Ip ►f If 1114.•'1 tn+v •1 , • tllrl 1.1"+! to 1. IM 111114
♦ JH ♦ 1 1 nm n 1«r•H•.r . rrx, 111 1!1 Ira,x nN glnelul 91mul Ir•
1
1 1•r H.lu Yn H'. N'.1 Im 411 111 Ilt M.i r.r n1. rif n1. hMr UwNn fa
WIMI
I 1/ Ilr• V11 411\ fV to a,n11r1
nr Is lol l.•+.• r !1111 111 of 11,rj Ir 1.i YA U1 111 1• IM logo
1 1. r. , r..1. ..,1 41.11 Mr p 11. . If A Lf. Inn W W4
T,~ 1' n114r1 ra. n1.'+p.a r II °vo•In 11 blrl.rl. I,, L44 pf
I. 1' k' ra L..r 1 r r.111 rrx Ilwr nr n., ,,.r, «4nmN •„n. An.'u
T L 1Ynry 1nr"r n <r." r1. r1. mlLf ;1 ItI ..a nYr IIY 1ngY llr+ d HI
ult 4anr, 1 « 11111 11
1.4• •.•In' I.M +I uH I n ! 11PI N•r 41 ?M.0 11-1
, f q IM Illfl M PYIIHY. rA •rd Vn•IAr !r'1nr npl 41 1'M.
4,i
l Y
!Ijr ~ F i i ;V' JEC4 ,
~ 0 f 7C ti
• ' y ,11 ••1 • t r 1 r ;.1'• L• 1111 r'.tr '.lwrua ne It11
~y- r I •.1 111 1'1. f!tlf\
-$-,.A_-~y. GLr 110 AOi~7--
r 1•. .•1 6 1•I
~r ~GJ 111 1 LCr I n~ v .r to W~ 4111. 0If
111-1
1411YItf I,Mbfllt IIM
01.0 40",
►Jf 1. 1 ~ .r 1 n'•rltgr
Il.F'.71. 8 11. 1t,ltr CAA117A14Y 5111tli,k11 - FINAL PLAT
A118711ACT• If Uelf /1t;If 9£i OR
LOTS ,2C A 20 , BLOCK I
A AFJLAT OF PANT OF LOT 2 1 BLOCK
GOLDEN TRIANGLE
INDUSTRIAL PARK
M1111'•11 fllll111C111
PHASE
All Nr 111, 1111•.1 MII1r41 SE V
'",-1` to 4. IMIrt1"Mr. wlp
4 pill l Ill. IlM 10, CITY Ot< OENTON
rnIf n Ir ,,I I -.Ir1'111 1 r ,llM DENTIN COUNTY 1 TEXAS 41011104
1041. n AlhM fo, „ + I1 N-' .11 M n1. r.. a1r•I h t,I 110 1., fill 11 V IYf EOLt"AII . AISOCIATff
Ir 111$T• t.lrl: a.r- ~.'-SF!7 "iC•""-' J►f It,, I ~ JI1'1N ►UA VC TIM{
II 1114 n r 0. {OK
r1 a 0lA1pMr if III AS 1`11101
1.u,r,a + 411.5{S•{f IS
I
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK--UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Cumberland Presbyterian
Children's Home Addition, Lot 11 Block 1
SUMMARY: This tract is 17.3 acres located at the
southwest corner of Bernard and Greenlee
Streets. This tract is shown in the A.N.B.
Tompkins survey, Abstract 1246, Denton, Texas.
The property is zoned Specific Use Permit
(S-167), and development of a gymnasium is
anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
eolid waste are available,
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ATTACHMENT: Reuuced plat
Ap,„~ A
Denise Spivek
Urban Planner
00600/6
E. P U C H A L S K T S U R V E Y A- 9 g 5
O •
+ w l
i
d3~t. 'i MI pK
ft *A t
x411%0 \
M
• , `
w
~ A
EARL. 91REEt L T ! L !
~ e
- J
_ E ST.
e•
i
8111611414111
00"21 ~r t
~
Ard i W-0 a"
It ra~
A , N. B . T Q M P K I N S S U R V E Y A- 1 2'4 6
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
FROM: Charlotte Allen, City Secretary
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Agenda Item Y3
I received a call from Ms. Susan Terrill requesting permission
for the Girl Scouts to display a banner across Carroll
Boulevard at University. The banner is in conjunction with the
annual Girl Scout cookie sale. No written back-up material was
submitted for this item.
'_11 'Xil
r o e en
2036C
DATE: l/e41~Fb
CI'ry COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO, Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting C i t y Manager
SUBJECT; camxuiity Food Center Utilities
RECO14MENDATION:
The Hunan Resources Ccrtmittee recam ends approval
of city funding of utility costs for the Ccmrnuiity
Food Center in the Razor Building for the rest of
fiscal year 1986.
SUMMAR Y;
The Comm mity Food center requested that the city
pay the cost of their utilities in the Razor Building,
BACKGROUND: 'Ibe Food Center is being relocated to Razor Building
by county. The building is currently being used by
danino players and the city is paying the utility bill.
There is one meter which serves the area used by the
players ..M the area. to be used by the Food Center.
PROGRXAS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED.
The Planning & Cc munity Development Department will
absorb the cost of the additional utilities.
F ISCAL IMPACT:
None
Re pect 'ul ly ubr fitted:
ruck !93V~ehra'
Acting City Manager
Prepared by:
El.z Ev
C ity llevelop mmt Mamger
Approved:
L-WhA
Jeff Meyer
Director, P1 ty Development
Unapproved Minutes
Human Resources Cormittee
January 13, 1986
Present: Trudy Foster, Fannie Gaupp, Betty Kreps, Donald Pickens,
Irene Price, Norrie Rawdon and Rudy Rodriquez
Absent: Linda Brock, Karen Connor, William Crouch, Bob LaPorte,
Ruth Tansey and Jim Riddlesperger.
Present Elizabeth E~wis, Comity Development Managert
from Barbara Ross, Camxrnity Development Coordinator and
Staff: Penny Black, Clerk.
I. Chairperson, Fannie Gaupp called the meeting to order at
4:30 p.m. Ms. Gaupp then explained that the reason for
the meeting was to discuss the Camunity Food Center's
need for funding from the city for payment of the utilities
used at their new offices in the Razor Building.
II. Ms. Kreps asked Ms. Evans to 1-_.ief the committee on the
organization.
f Ms. Evans explained the Camumity Food Center was an or-
ganization tkAt purchased and distributed camadities to
needy persons. SN-~ alp., mentioned the food service receives
referrals from agencies, churches and volunteer 9LTA v .
The city has paid for the utilities in the Razor Building
for the domino players and the Food Center needs utility
services also,
III. Ms. Gaupp called for a recce mwwdation for funding of utility
costs in the Razor Building for the Camlmity Food Center
for the remainder of fiscal year 1986.
Ms. Kreps made the motion for a recommendation, Mr. Rodriquez
seconded the motion, 7 in favor - 0 opposed.
IV. The meeting adjouLivd at 5:10 p.m.
1
1
t
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svohla, Acting City Manager
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Agenda Items 5, 6 and 7
Agenda items 5, 6 and 7 are ordinances which are the final
action for annexation. These ordinances have been placed on
the agenda for approval prior to the public hearings for zoning
on the properties.
11 " / at
C Ye
ca
2035C
IT41"
DATE: 1/21/86
CITY COUNCIL REPO T ]FORMAT
Vim
T0:
Mayor and Member of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City !tanager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND
APPROXIMATELY 34.60 ACRES IN SIZE SITUATED IN THE M. FORREST SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 417 AND BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET SOUTH OF AND
PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTER LINE OF F.M. 426 AND APPROXIMATELY 21000
FEET EAST OF MAYHILL ROAD (A-14)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended annexation and zoning
at its meeting of March 13, 1985.
SUMMARY:
This is one of six annexations being reprocessed due to an error in
publication procedures.
Final action is scheduled for January 21, 1986.
The purpose of the annexation is to extend City Control of
development and land use into this area. A petition for a change in
zoning for duplex and commercial land use was submitted and approved.
BACKGROUND:
A final plat has been approved for this site per regulations of the
City of Denton. The plat conforms to the planned development site
plan.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AVPECTEIS:
If annexed and zoned, all Ci:y departments providing basic services
(Police, Fire, Solid Wasted etc.) future residents and businesses.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined.
tRe ily s itb~s
Prepared by: • Rick Svehla
ou Acting City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App ve
Jef f Me
Director of Planning
and Development 06958
1
03k M + r.,,• rr,,F..g xs'^'a {t `~;x +-cs}.., _a. .,--N j',^q^"`T `''s,'.
N0.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BEING ALL THAT CAT, TRACT OR PARCEL
OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY ?5,60 ACRES OF LAND LYING
AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DFATON, STATE OF TEXAS A1CD
BEING PART OF THE K. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 417, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of R. 0. McDonnell; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was forded e a pu lie hearing
held for that purpose on the . day o? o blip m Ir , 1985
in the Council Chambers for a interests persons to state
their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was Aefforded, at a publ}c hearing
held for that purpose on the day of Wt- a e.,*16P V , 1985
in the Council Chambers for-all interests persona to state
their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Taxes,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW,
THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made hereby a pant of said City and the land and the
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citirens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate
part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby
annexed is described as follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part
of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, said point lying in
the present city limits As established by Ordinance No. 83-134,
said point also lying 250 feet south of and perpendicular to the
center line of F. . 426 (East McKinney) and in the west boundary
line of a tract of land conveyed to R. 0. McDonnell by dead
recorded to Volume 1200, Page 462 of the Deed Records of Denton
County, Texas:
THENCE south 68°18'50" east along the present city limits, 250
feet south of and parallel with the centerline of F.M. 426 (East
McKinney), a distance of 319.22 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 64°33'48" east along said lines, a distance of
424.31 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 63°44'11" east, along said lines, a distance of
316.39 feet to a point for a corner;
A-14/R. 0. MCDONC16L1./PAGE ONE
,,,4,
ur
77
THENCE south 0°10'40" west, a distance of 664.96 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 1°00'46" east, a distance of 798.58 feet to a point
for a corner said point lying in the south boundary line of
said McDonnell tract;
THENCE north 89°30'13" west, alono the south boundary line of
said McDonnell tract, a distance oc 812.67 feet to a point for a
corner, same being the southwest corner of said McDonnell tract;
THENCE north 1°00'46" west, along a west boundary line of said
McDonnell tract a distance of 798.58 feet to a point for a
corner;
THENCE north 88°07'49" west, along a south boundary line of said
tract, a distance of 158.15 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 1°00'54" east, along a west boundary line of raid
tract, a distance of 692.37 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 0°14'47" west, along a west boundary line of said
tract, a distance of 321.99 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 1°11'58" west, Along a west boundary line of said
tract a distance of 78.75 feet to the place of beginning and
containing 34.60 acres of land, more or loam.
SECTION 11.
The above described pruperty is hereby classified as
Agricultural A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION 111,
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the 1 day of
PMLer , 1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1986.
RICHARD 0. 3TEM~ MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECKETARY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
A-14/R. 0. MCDONNELL/PAGE TWO
PLAN Or guava FqR A AREA. C DENTON Tmw
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
sexing an aroa; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THL&EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(8) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09. of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
B. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- '
vided within the cimy will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
ry
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures nettessary for traffic flow, etc,
will begin on the effecl;ivo date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annex6+1on.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
0. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection servi.es now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Servtca' Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1.) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a live year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plap is prioritized by auch 1olicy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
i
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan., which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
~ i.:..~ ,g' , , i +s f;p•.r~ ktT.F! r,y s.ayj.5
r
r
r
r ~
r
000
mope ililillilljllllllllllillillillillill"I
L
"MW 0
INK!
.
.
Wei
. t •`~,y
A-i4
ANNUArlom SCASOUL4
v-,'Octooer 2d, 19dS Suumit agenda item
L..,,e'Uctooer 19, l~d> :~uomit agenda bacx•up
v~ Nov&moor 5, l9d5 CttY Council sets date, time and place
for puolic nearing
,/rlovemoer 6, 1985 NOticO to Denton Aecord Cnronicle
"November d, 19d5 Puolisn notice and mailout
✓ Novemoer 11,19d5 Suoinit agenda itoto
kO"~Novemoer 12,19d5 Suomit agenda uacx-up
Novemodc 19, 1~0d5 City council nolds first puolic nearing
✓o oveawor 2U, i9j* notice to Denton decord Cnronicle
✓ ,Voveawer 22, 1986 Pu411an notice and "ilout
,./elovemwer 15, 1985 Suomit Agenda item
veinoer 26, 19d$ Suomit agenda odcx-up
L$--"Dece►aaer 3, 1985 City Council nolds second puolic nearing
~Decemoer 9, 19d5 Suomit agenda item
4/Decemoer lu, 1985 Suomit agenda oack-up
LI~Decameer 17, 1946 City Council institutes annexation
proceedings
t/ Oecemuer ld, 19d5 Ordinance to uentun Aecurd Cnronicle
✓uecemwer 2J, 1985 Puolisn ordinance
January 13, 1946 Submit agenda ite4a
✓ januacy 14, 19d 6. Suomit agenda DOCK-Up
* January 11, 1986 final action oy City Council
* Denotes action by the City Council
09649
Planning and Zoning Commission
March U, I98s
the Cilo DmiatoaM, Tixasavaa lsaldgooni• CO issi a off
at 3;00 p.m., 'a use Council Chamber of the Municipal hBuuildiing.
Present: Bill Claiborne, R.D. Escue, Jr., Gary Jurea,
Robert Worte, Tom Pearson and Andy Sidor
Absent; Ruby Cole
Present from Staff; David Ellison, Senior Planner; Demise Spivey,
Urban Planner; Caeile Carson Urbuc Planer; Tina Hill,
Intern; Joe Morris, Acting C Attorney; Jerry Clark,
City Ea sneer; Rocrosh 01yai, Transportation Ul Laser;
Ray Rue field, Civil Lngi"er; and Debbie Soydaton,
secreeary
1. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting of
February 27, 1985.
Mr. Worts node a notion to approve the minutes of tee
regular meeting of February 27, 1943. Seconded by Mr. Sidor
and motion carried unanimously (3-0).
Mr. Eecus arrived at the meeting.
11. Considerations
A. r Racotmmend approval of the paCitioa of R. 0. MaDoaneV,
for annexation of approximately 34.b acres of land
situated is the M. arrest Survey, Abstract 417, Gad
bsgi_sniag approximately 230 feet south of mad perpen-
dicular to the centerline of FM 426 and approximately
29000 fast east of Mavaill Road (A-14).
Mr. XIILaoo stated this !s end petition of
R.O. McDonnell for annexation of approxinicaly 34.6
acres of land situated 230 feet south of and parpen-
dicular to the aeacerline of FM 426 and approximately
2,000 feet east of Mayhiil Road. He stated the request
is voluntary. This is the site of the requsst for two
family "a general retail land use witn retail/ware-
housing permitted. He added, a portion of the overall
sits is currently located vitain Cho city limits. Staff
recommends approval of this request.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of R.O. McDonnell for annexatioc of approxi-
mately 34.6 acres of land situated in the M. Forrest
Survey, Abstract 417, and be ianiag approximately 230
feet south of Gad perpaadieu~or to the centerline of
rK 426 and approximately 2,000 feet east of Me hill Road
(A-14). Seconded by Mr. LaPorte and unsnimoualy carried
(b-0) .
I. Recommend approval of the petition of Hammett is Nash,
Inc. and the City of Denton for annexation of approxi-
mataly 150 acres of land located vast of Mayhill Road,
approximately 4,000 feet north of I-359 and adjacent and
north of tae MKkT railroad (A-17).
Mr. Ellison stated this request is for approximately 130
aarea of land located west of Mayhill bad approximately
i 40000 feet north of 1-33 and sdjaceat and north of the
1 MAT Railroad. He stated Hammett and Naga, lac., have
submitted a voluntary request for entisxatioa ;ad lignt
induatrial sonift on a 30 acre portion Of this site.
<<
f t(J i
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM '
TO: Mayor and hembers of the City Council
PROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Agenda Items S, 6 and 7
Agenda items S, 6 and 7 are ordinances which are the final
action for annexation. These ordinances have been placed on
the agenda for approval prior to the public hearings for zoning
on the properties.
ve
CA
20350
1
s r ...af$'w fre:_ a..,;
~ ifZlhi
CM C"CU RNPW t0NOT l
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM., Rick Sve.hla, Acting City Manager
SUE,YECTt ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND
APPROXIMATELY 150 ACRES IN SIZE LOCATED WEST OF MAYHILL ROAD
APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET NORTH OF I-35 (A-17)
REC2WENDATI ON :
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its
meeting of March 13, 1985.
SUMMARY:
This is one of six annexations being reprocessed due to an error in
publication procedures.
Hammett & Nash Engineers and Surveyors, Inc. submitted a request for
annexation and light induztrial zoning on a 50 acre portion of this
site. The change in zoning process will also be repeated. Staff is
recommenling annexing the additional 100 acre4 to incorporate all of
the area west of Mayhill Road. High intensity Development Guide
j Policies are .applicable,
No development has occurred to date.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
All departments responsible for services and programs guaranteed to
City residents (Police, Fire, Solid Waste, Library, etc.) One
residence and an estimated 2 persons are located in the nubject area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
undetermined
espe tfully ubagl~ted:
.t4
Prepared by: S a
~-Acting City Manager
l.
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Appro :
I
4,r
Jeff Meye ''G
Director of Planning
and Development
1055g
.?F+-:c t):....: fMnv T4'yH?'Y^ _ .3~. h-'e -.a1f'~ wAe 'r s acrt ;qy`~ .;-c sT r
r
w
r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT
TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR
PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 150 ACRES OF LAND
LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF
TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE D. HOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 646,
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A"
DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS* the requeet for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of Hammett & Nash, Inc. and the City of
Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was e,gorded, at a publi hearing
held for that purpose on the ~1~r~'S+day of Alo c°rn pY', 1985
in the Council Chambers for a'il interaste persons to state
their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a publiq hearing
held for that purpose on the day of b0'✓, 1985
in the Council Chambers for a interaste persona to state
their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton,
Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public
hearings; NOW,
THEREF1RE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is wade hereby a art of said City and the land and the
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the sots and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate
part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby
annexed is deb,,ribed as follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the Countyy of Denton, State of Texas, and being
part of the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. 6460 and more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in present city limits as established by
Ordinance No. 81-94, said point lying in Mayhill Road at the
northeast corner of the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. 6460 some
being the southeast corner of the J. Brandon Survey, Abstract
No. 1515;
THENCE west along the north boundary line of said Hough Survey
same being the south boundary line of said Brandon Survey,
passing the southwest corner of the said Brandon Survey, same
being the southeast corner of J. W. Cheek Survey, Abstract No.
324, a distance of 2640 feet, more or lass, to the northwest
A-17/HAMMETT & NASH, I17C./PAGE ONE
rS
e:a ~ .r~£.:.'.:'aF'- ~ F 1 i °SN ~'S ,s2t ~ ~ v}M; i .Y.v~ K ~.p -sYSF T+•,r
corner of the said D. Hough Survey, same being the northeast
corner of the J. White Survey, Abstract No. 14330 said point
also being a corner of the present city limits as described in
Ordinance No. 84.17;
THENCE south along the said present city limits, same being the
west boundary line of said Hough Survey and the east boundary
line of the said White Survey to a point for a corner in the
southwest right-of-way line of the M.K. 4 T. Railroad;
THENCE southeasterly, along said present citq limits, same
being the southwest right-of-way line of the M.K. 6 T. Railroad
to a point for a corner at the intersection of the east
right-of-way line of Mayhill Road with the southwest
right-of-way line of the H.K. & T. Railroad, said point also
lyfngg in the present city limits as established by Ordinance
No. 78-38;
THENCE north 78°41'20" east along said prevent city limits,
crossing said railroad right-of-way, a distance of 100.0 feet
to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 54°31'50" east along said present city limits, a
distance of 88 feet to a point for a curner;
THENCE north 31°41' east along said present city limits, a
distance of 66 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 10°51'09" east along said present city limits, a
distance of 46.68 feet to a point for a corner, same being a
corner in the resent city limits as described in Ordinance No.
78-38 and 83-16;
THENCE north 4°13'44" east along the present city limits as
described in Ordinance No. 83-16 same being the west boundary
line of the 0. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330 and the east
boundary line of the D. Lombard Survey, Abstract No. 784 and in
Mayhill Road, a distance of 719.12 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 2°25'30" east along said present city limits, same
being the west boundary line of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract
No. 1330 and the east boundary line of tho D. Lombard Survey,
Abstract No. 784 and the D. Hough Survey, Abstract No. 646 and
in Mayhill Road, a distance of 1140.8 feet to a point for a
corner, aame beingg the northwest corner of the tract described
in Ordinance No. 83-16;
THENCE north 2° east continuing along said lines and in said
road a distance of 1746 feet, more or less, to the place of
beginning and containing 150 acres of land, more or less.
SECTION It.
The above described propertq is hereby classified as
Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION III.
T;-.is ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
pasaege.
A-17/HAWETT 6 HASH, INC./PAGE TWO
i
a 'jR'~ !u .?^f :may ~~~{rvT-MS~`jL°.+iF .Xrq ac '!x+^ 3'+*M >~F~++WR. .-.e° T$F~:[~i.':.I +t;r4 a. '..,d-.°s as
Introduced before the City Council on the day of
_je se h1 bef , 1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1985.
RICHARD U. UTEWARTO MAYUK
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.
A-17/HAMMLT7' & NASHO INC./PACE THREE
i
Dams. TMW
ng§»`1HEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an )rdinance
sexing an area; and
WBEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY Comm OF Two CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a ao
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service;
1. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present perscnnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of they fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) hater for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service new pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
kPIK zra :r s: ^yg ?A}T Ft, s9 'w y1 2£ 'i"f f ?rd iW ,h3c'cd~ 3•k `
4 q c +
Annexed Areas
page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardow
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of they city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereaft,Rr
encompass the annexed area,
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Y; ~i ' '~F3kv',' ~~"~,y`.;R ~r§.': •1 y~y ..v r w 5ar.,.h `f -5 r for _a_.+gA97Y 3.y':; y t..... v'~-y~ y:,?{rf. +YT,c._~ r7i ,S
s". R
~t~nrr Pisa -
Laaesed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up=
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be ;Judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
ly~i
rn. _
4. 7~
•
1
t
w
' I
-a.
'LIN
A-17.
w
,p ,n Fa<sd-° -"ri'¢s y jms R. ~..;r. • '<e Z?.: .+"$r . _°t ~y ° °s: vn "~d,° ^ r a S ^ ?k a~S ,'y'~' m+o rosin
ML7
ANNEXATION SCdADUC,g
✓ octooer 180 19dS SuDAit agenda item
✓bctooer 29, 1985 Suumit agenda bacx-up
Novemoor 5, 19d5 City Council gets crate, time and place
for public nearing
4e---W0vem0er 6, 1988 Notice to Denton Record Cnronicle
✓Nove;nber 8, 14d5 Pubiisn notice and mailout
L.--'Novemaur 11,1985 Submit agenda item
L,/c9ovemaer 12,19d5 Submit agenda oacx-up
~ Novemuer 190 19ul City Council holds first public nearing
November 2u, llda Notice to Denton Record Cnronicle
Novemoer 11, 19d5 Pu+olisa notice and mailout
vtvovemoer 25, 19d5 Suumit agenda itam
✓ Novemaer 16, l9d3 Submit agenda oaCK-up
December 3, 19dS City Council nolds second public nearing
December 9, 1985 Suumit agenda item
U.--~Dec*Awdr lu, 19d5 Submit agenda oack-up
v,rDecember 17, 1386 City council instxtutes annexation
proceedings
4--'Dacember id, 19d6 Ordinance to Denton Record Cnronicle
,/6ecemoer 2U# 19da Puolisn ordinance
January 13, 198r Submit agenda item
vJanuary 14, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
* January 21, 19d6 Final action oy city Council
* Denotes action oy the City Council
U964g
"3nift -ITT. r. •p}, q}~-•r: n -n -Rr" .z ..h /~#'1 rsNry ` t ;+r :rM 9Y 4 .t
Minutes
Planning and zon Commission
March 13, I983
The regular swetiag 2f the Plano ng sad Zonia Co foal oft
ate Taxes
Present: Bill Claiborne, R.B. Escus, Jr., Gary Juren,
Robert Worts, Tom Pearson and Andy Sidor
Absent., Ruby Cole
Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey,
Urban Planner; Ceaile Carson, Urban Planner; Tina Hiil,
Intern; Joe Morris, Acting City attorney; Jerry Clark,
City Engineer; K.oorosh Olyai, Transportation Engineer;
Ray Rumiield, Civil Engineer; sad Debbie boydaton,
secretary
1. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting of
February 27, 1985.
Mr. Lalorte made a motion to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of February 27, 1983. Seconded by Mr. Sidor
and motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Mr. Escue arrived at the meeting.
II. Considerations
A. Recommend approval of the petition of R. 0. McDonnell
for annexation of approximately 34.6 rcres of land
situated in the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, and
beginning approximately 230 foot mouth of and perpen-
dicular to the centerline of PM 426 and approximately
2,000 foot east of Maynill Road (A-1+).
Mr. Ellison stated this is the petition of
R.O. McDonnell for annexation of approximately 34.o
acres of land situated 230 feet south of and perpen-
diaular to the centerline of FM 426 and approximately
29000 feet east of Maynill Road. he stated the request
is voluntary. This is the site of the request for two
family aaa general retail land use witn retail/ware-
housing permitted. He added, a portion of the overall
si"e is currently located within the city limits. Staff
recommends approval of this request.
Me, Sidor aaoa a motion to recommend approval of tltr
petition of R.O. McDonnell for annexacion of approxi-
mately 34.6 acres of land situated in the M. Forrest
Survey, Abstract 417, and beginning approximately 250
feet south of and perpendicular to Cho centarline of
FM 426 and approximately 2,000 feet east of No hill Road
(A-14). Seconded by Mr. LaForce and unanimously"
nanimously carried
(6-0).
8. Recommend approval of the petition of Hammett 6 Nash,
Inc. and the City of Denton for annexacion of a proxi-
macely 150 acres of land located west of Maynill Road,
approximately 4,000 feet north of 1.350 and adjacent and
north of the MK6T railroad (A-17).
Mr. Ellison stated this request is for approximately 130
acres of land located west of Maynill load approximately
4,000 fast north of I-33 and adjacent and north of Cho
MKUT Railroad. He stated Hammett and Nash, Inc., have
submitted a voluntary request for annexation and light
industrial zoning on a 50 acre portion of this alts.,
~ ~ ~''t"~3i'•y'#~, a~ Y' , ~ay~j7 s-.~ ~ Qar.~:~~x •-r gm- ~ ,z. ~ st- -rn..?' `et [ 5'= . +j+
x
=13, 198s
aq
Staff is recommending annexing the additional 100 acres
to incorporate all of tno area vest of Mayltill "ad.
He added nigh intensity Development Guide policies are
applicable to this area.
No. Mason Haggard, an area property owner, asked if it
would be required for the developer to build a fence.
Chairman Claiborne answered that will be discussed on
the coning case which will also be heard at this meeting.
Mr. Ellison added City Council will consider all of the
annexation requests on March 19, 1985.
Mr. Escus made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of Hammett k Nash, Inc. and the City of Denton
for annexation of approxiaately 150 acres of land
located west of Mayhi11 Road, approxiaately 4,000 feat
north of I-35, and adjacent and north of the K"T Rail-
road (A-17). Seconded by Mr. Sidor and carried unan-
i~a ysly (6-0).
III. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the staff and approval
thereof will be strictly on the basis of the staff raeou
mendation, Approval of the consent agenda authorises the
Director of Planning and Community Development or his desig-
nee to proceed with each item in accordance with the staff
recommendation.
A. Ra•iommand approval of preliminary plat of the
Creekaide Addition.
8. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the
Kslsoe-Pitner Addition.
Mr. Latorte made a motion to approve the Consent
Agenda. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously
carried (6-0).
IV. Public Hearings
A. r;g72 tins aschis the etition of 1. 0. ange In zonint from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (FD) district
on a 39.4 acre treat located on the south side of EN 426
(East McKinney Street) approximately 2,000 feet east of
Mayhill Road. If approved, the planned development will
permit the following land uses;
5.9 acres - general retail
33.5 acres - duplex
Ms. Spivey stated there were five reply forms mailed
to property owners and none were returned.
Mr. Brian Burke stAc%d as discussed at the previous
meetin , he is reliresmnting the petitioner and has
don,, to preliminary etagtueering including a preliminary
plat. He stated Choy would like to nave frontage alon
McKinney Street. He stated they are requesting general
retail/office. He continued the warehouses will nave
office fronts with storage in the back. He stated
Mt. McDonnell, petitioner, would also like to have a
cabinet shop, wholesale co butlders with rear delivery
and shipment.
,,a `s.+C # s;~z't'a4":_. n x ca •fiv r. - '~"iR" ae '.'.t ~S
✓ a. n
l f
1
CITY OF DBNTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Agenda Items S, 6 and 7
Agenda items S, 6 and 7 are ordinances which are the final
action for annexation. Those ordinances have been placed on
the agenda for approval prior to the public hearings for zoning
on the propertiess
x1c
CA
20SSC
CI ?if CIL ARM ~9ftT
TO: Mayor anJ Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND
A^PROXIMATELY 60.30 ACRES IN SIZE SITUATED IN TAN G. WALKER SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1330, AND 8891NNING ADJACENT AND BAST OF EDWMS ROAD (A-18)
RECMMOATIeN:
The Planning and Zoning wommission recommended annexation and zoning
at its meeting of March 13, 1985.
SUMMARY :
This is one of six annexations tieing reprocessed due to an error in
publication procedures.
The petitioners submitted a request for annexation and zoning) both
were approved. Edwards Road Is an unimproved dirt road that must be
upgraded at developer's uxpense when development occurs. Low
intensity Development Guide policies are applicable to this site.
BACKGROU D:
This site abuts property approved for mobile home park use
(originally called Allan Estates). Existing Andrew Corporation
facilities and property is located south of the tract. Development
Guide policies for low intensity areas are applicable. Current land
use patterns along the Mayhill Road corridor range from low and
moderate density residential to the City Wastewater Treatment Plant
and new Landfill and light industrial.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTrL'NTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
No existing housing or population will be affected by this proposed
annexation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
spec lly 41 m1 d:
Prepared by: Rick vehla
Acting City Manager
i A4,son
David Senior' F `,Annex
Approv
Jeff Meyer
Direutor of Planning
and Development 1056g
,Yy t ~
N0.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT WT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXINATRLX 60.38 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTOl1, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
PART OF THE G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 13301 DENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the petition of Redditch Investments, Corp.; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the 4~, day of o ✓a sw ! v , 1985 in the
Council Chambers for all~n[ereated persons to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity wee afforded at a p blic hearing held
for that purpose on the day of ~rrc. tv , 1985 in the
Council Chambers for all n erested persons to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW,
THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the Game is
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by
the acts and ordinances of said City now In effect or which may
hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be
subject to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes levied by
the City, The tract of 'kand hereby annexed is described as
Follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the G.
Walker Survey, Abtract No. 1330 and more particularly described as
follows.
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point being
the northeast corner of the tract described in annexation
Ordinance No. 83-16, teats being the northwest corner of a tract of
land described in Volume 297, Page 584 of the dead records of
Denton County, Texas;
THENCE south 86°53' east along the north boundary tine of said
tract, a distance of 1412.5 feet to a point for a corner, same
being the northeast corner said tract;
i
THENCE south 2°14' west along the east boundary line of said
tract, a distance of 1867.0 feet to a point for a corner in an
A-18/R1iDDITCH INVESTMENTS, CORF./PAGE ONE
} _ .L .a ~&~A`%~~i"~ .f~"~1_-: ~ K^.. e.J,s•-' _ _e RYd!% ~ i \ )at' .44' 4 L
• ;r ce' v hz 3 ~ y . t^ g 45 rr ^7 £ u~, xy . ¢v3r ^ 3 x ? s a z -"'v '
%
n
east and west portion of a county road known as Edwards Road, same
being the southeast corner of said tract;
THENCE north 86408' west along the south boundary line of said
tract and in said road, a distance of 1331.3 feet to a point for a
corner, same being ttui southwest corner of said tract;
THENCE north 10°22' west along the west boundary line of said
tract and in said road, a distance of 505.5 feet to a point for a
corner;
THENCE north 3°27' east continuing along the west boundary line of
said tract and in said road, passing at 203.4 feet the southeast
corner of said tract described in annexation Ordinance No. 83-16,
and continuing along said lines and city limits for a total
distance of 1357.8 feet to the place of beginning and containing
60.38 acres of land, more or lose.
SECTION II.
The above described property is hereby classified as Agricul-
tural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map
of the City of Denton, Texas, which nap is hereby amended
accordingly.
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the !7 N ' N ' day of e jer ,
1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1986.
RICHARD 0. TMKkT-0-RM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,9TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
9Y:
A-18/REDDITCH INVUTMENTS, CORP./PAGE TWO
X !'tom ' A11 .1.. I~ . M A lA, CITY as `0 . TEXAS
~t l Y .tt♦ti~ ~ 81.111 r~
M-1-1 S, Article 970& as amended requires that a plan of service
'e adopted by the governing body of & city prior to passage of an ordinance
nexinE an area; and
I/BERBAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as Shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
ascended, Texas Code Annotated, these is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area to* following plan of service:
1. Baltic Service Plan
A, Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
S. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equi,p-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. 'dater
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in ac^ordlance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city wt.ll be extended to the
annexed area within one mouth after the effective
date of annexation.
VOIi*...,.$~'F• F ) J A M 'ill 1'. t
e Plan
Arced Areas
Page two
y, Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
Go Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
S. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will theres.fter
encompass the annexed area.
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annev..tion, The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational progr&L and
facilities in .,he enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city xecomm4nds the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
.s:" .i2.^,.-.•e. F-:.lam <<. ,l.`
.~'~`~ij ,c°°i "F?Fc~,. ^x's` S,`'t.e' °:ta: , b r, . .w "-s`3^
,E
t MAIN . a" Are'"
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1,) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up»
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
H ~ i.~., t ♦ .f` 4ai~ •}'r, ti1 ` JYRr,A~' ,ei„ ,M Y. t1~ Iw _ti t ~ 'i+a=
g
>a9P".r n 'vrcS'r :.,i ik " -gyp
w
0 mesa
i A-18 . .
.
.
1
4.sagp'7t.
A-1d
ANNEKAPtON Scd@D(jLS
Oetooer 18, 1985 Submit agenda item
woo--~Octouvr 494F 1gd5 saomit agenda oack-wp
November 5, 1985 City Council sets date, tiAt and place
,for public hearing
A-eolovemoer 6, 1945 Notice to Denton ,8ecard Chronicle
''~Novembmr at 1945 Puolish notice and mailout
v'' Nuvemoer 11,1985 Sunmit agenda item
L./ O vemaer 12,1985 Suoatit agenda back-up
Novemoer 19, 1945 City Council nolds first
public hearing
wovem,oer dU, 1985 NOcics to Denton Record Chronicle
v November 210 1985 Puolisn notice and mailout
C--~Ovemaer 251 198S Sunmit agenda item
&ttrvemoer 26, 1995 Sunmit agenda aacx-up
Decamcer 3 1985
City Council nolds second public hearing
✓ t)ecembrr 91 1940
submit agenda item
✓uecemoer lU, 19do Suoniit agenda baeK-UP
'-*'Decemoer 17, 19do City COu"cii in;titutea annexation
proceedings
/~aceinoer ld, 1985 Urdinance to Denton Record Chronicle
December 2U, 19d5 Puolisn ordinance
✓January 13, 1946 Submit agenda item
January 14, 1986 SUbmit agenda bacx-up
* January 21, 19d6 Final action oy City Council
* Denotes action ay the City Council
09649
i
-.~y.~ ~5;,_> y i s mY .N s 4 V :~[N+;~sy .y,~"33~`dY,s°+1~~ ••~!"rS~',fSt'.s?w'°~y~#§:.
i
t Minutes
Mauch 13, 1983
page 10
Match Branch Road. Zoaiag and
sere office site has been rev#ew~dtaCity Council. adpxtx+pctil, The
In# aad Zoning Commission aA
Ci tdr byi-tree
Plasut ,a City CStruct directed staff to sAaex tie satire Tr
tool
S gZ Structures
Amaexattoa of , ;AC., property lm October, 1984.
gas balance of the parcel was delayed
pending the submission of a proper legal description.
theaPropertydded
obloctt&de to tdate,aQYever,
Mr. Sidor made a motion to rseowt the
peattt104 of the City of Denton for aAAexaapproval
end tioa of of approx-
imtely 4t.3S acres of load situated in the S. Hui:ar
footenorthsOfaAnd SDdrpendicuioratog the C*bt+rliai of0
U.S. H1 hway 380 and west of Reach Branch Road (A-IS).
Seconded by Mr. LaPorte and unanimously carried (6-0),
D. Recommend approval of the petition of Redditch
Iavestaants GQrporsttoa for aansxatioa of approximately
60,36 acres situated in tam G. Walker Survey, Abstract
1338, and beginning adjacent and east of Edwards Road
(A-18).
Mr. Ellison stated the petitioners have submitted a
request for voluatw:y AAaexati*a to the Planning and
COmmttatty Dsvelopmeat Department. Tail site is adjacent
and east of Edwards Road sA uAIMproved dirt road that
aunt be upgraded. City will be responsible for main.
tanence aad paviag of this dirt road unless development
occurs
pp Low intensity
DevelopmeatrQuid* policiessarenaiPlicable co tsis site.
He c°atinued, the Allan Estates ,bOuilo Home Park site
(S - ley) is located adjacent and west of Edwards Road,
Existing Andrew Corporation facilities and property is
also located in this vicinity. Current land use
patterns along the Mayhill Road corridor range from low
and moderate density residential to the City Wastewater
Treatment Plant and new landfill and light industrial,
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of Redditch Investments Corporation for an-
nexation of approximatly o0.38 acres situated in the
G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and beginning adjacent
and east of Edwards Road (A-18), Seconded oy Mr, 83cue
and.unaniaously carried (0.0),
E. Recommend approval f a resolution adspttng the
taadard S eciflWilv! s for public Works Construction
or antra
o ° w spublic pworks, water utility,iand
private develOpment projects for the City of Denton,
Texas.
Deacon is axmemberdofatheeNOrth TexasdCouncilacf Govera-
meats. Rick Svenla, Assistant City Manager, helped put
the specifications to/ether. Mr. Jim Riddlesperper is
a member of several NTCOG Committees. He gave A list of
cities wno nave already adopted tae specifications. He
LOAttAued, there are L lot of contractors comnontln
that everytime they come co Denton, they find sometfing
different regarding specifications' He state,
would like to adopt a set of standards with fewtvQ~.epty
tions or variations to serve as a legitimate 8u
He added, the NTCOG uss an errasiom control char in
ca*tr storm mamalawat soctiop, aAa we world i9Xe
~ ~ Pe~to4 art
Ift
` y . 1"I ere►Amm e
.7 x -1WWW- .j'„
F
OA'R: 01/21/86
CITT CID RKPORT TOMAT V i
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
RW4 Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUMCT: PUBLIC HRARING ZONING CASZ Z-172'
uggJ12Mp ? ION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of December 4, 1985, and voted to recommend approval of
Z-1725.
j_qH ARY:
This is a request for a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 39.4
acre tract located on the south side of R. McKinney Street (P.M.
1426) approximately 2,000 feet east of Meyhill Read,
BACK4R4M,
This item is being reconsilered because of a technical problem with
the annexation.
PROGRAM, HBO= QR GROUPS WICTRD:
Five (5) property owners within 200 feet were notified.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
R peotf lly s~Pmtt~ed:
Prepared by: Rick e
ti Acting City Manager
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Appr edJe'f Mey
Director of Planning
and Development
1009a
.gj
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1725 Meeting Date: January 21, 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: R. 0. McDonnell, McDonnell Enterprise
P. 0. Box 50239
Denton, Tx 76206
Status of Applicant: Owner/Developer
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) district to
the planned development (PD)
classification
Location: South side of East McKinney Street,
(FM 426) approximately 21000 feet
east of Mayhill Road
Size: Approximately 39.4 acres
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North Vacant, S-174 (mobile home
park); A
South Vacant, agricultural; outside
city limits
East - Agricultural, single family
house; outside city limits
West - Agricultural; At outside city
limits
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated low intensity.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Utilities: The developer will need to extend a
16" water line along FM 426 from
Mayhill Road across property
frontage. A 12' sewer line will be
required to be extended from the
Hickory Creek outfall line through
this property to the Meadow Addition.
Electric, telephone, and qas service
is available to the tract.
i r 4 r>~ ~ s^ 4+ ~T. ~ 4"r" r~.°a, N(.~ ~3 t 'ti Y'~,• \.R lR.~ r c 44
(Case Z-1725)
pace Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Engineering: Drainage is a significant
consideration at this site.
Detention and off-site discharge
points will be required. Culverts
and underground drainage pipes may
also be required.
Transportation: Access to East McKinney Street
(FM 426) will be limited as per
Subdivision Rules and Regulations.
A collector street will be required
down the center of the tract for
access. Sidewalks will be required
along East McKinney and the collector
street.
HISTORY
The property was part of an annexation approved by the City
Council in June of 1985. Due to a technical problem with
advertising, staff is resubmitting the annexation and zoning
petitions to the Planning and Zonisag Commission and City council
for .:onsideration. The zoning was approved by the planning and
zoning Commission by a vote of 6-0 and by the City Council on
June 41 1985. The final action of the annexation is scheduled
for January 21, 1985.
ANALYSIS
This site is contained in a low intensity blob on the overall
concept plan of the Denton Development Guide but is not located
in a specific intensity study area. The area is relatively free
of development at the present time; therefore, a general inten-
sity standard for the area would not be exceeded if this request
were approved. Duplex or two-family (2-F) housing is consistent
with low intensity area policies as these areas are set aside as
the main residential areas of the city.
This request was considered at the Planning ind Zoning Commission
meeting of February 27, 1985 and approved as a planned develop-
ment for duplex and general retail land uses. The petitioner's
original request for commercial use wav modified to general
retail with office/retail/warehouse privileges at the above
mentioned meeting. Staff decided to readvertise the request as
a second public hearing in order that it be more adequately
advertised. Development Guide policies restrict office/retail/
commercial concentrations in low intensity areas to four acres
in size: approval of this request would slightly exceed the
limits established by the Development Guide policy.
31 N)gw ptm a:v af.s. .,fw. . r y3. '3~ 'a '+.r rr -.ae-r .a.
-min
(CASO E-1725)
Page Three
RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1725 at
itd December 41 1985 meeting with the following conditions #votes 6-0)
1. A sir (6) foot solid wood fence be erected along the
southern boundary of the general retail section
24 Office/retail/warehouse facilities will be permitted
in the general retail section of the planned development.
3. A comr,,rehen.sive site plan must be approved before plate are
appzovcd by the Planning and Zoning Commission ane City
Coranci 1.
ALTERN,ITIVES
~y
1, Approve petition
2. Approve petition with cunditions
3. Deny petition
{
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map
2. PD Concept Plan
3. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the meetings of
February 27, 1985 and March 13, -1,985
4. Reply Form Total
5. Mailing List
6. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the meeting of
Pecumber 4, 1985
0682s
7.''.'z y'~"!M', • ; F .z. i-:s.rx i„ =~+F.m.. to 't l .x arN%~..
r
f~
T! ~
I ,
r ~ r r I
I'
Tom, WOPOIP
law!
~I
618 A:x~d ,
r
Z-1725
1 1
. Iw INM4. MII MfI n♦~Nn • IN•whW..
S rMwv.♦n «IMrNI w♦, wr, AN ,.bnw!
/1 •'••pi~tlli~•wff• wAr r,/•ra.l 1{y,♦•na 1,/n IN -•wwN••r..
i' ■ • exit l/fl•••IN~•fll••Il 1!•tl wr'w••NNw M w,I,MI w w/ N"»•I .•w•
` ~ 1 , 1 •~'77nW+► ,M M•.Y M MI IM1wNH r 1•A[ !•'GI•
lT l 11/ N/•;
s ♦ •"w♦ wIr
w. ~ ti . Mn Nrl
y, f \ Ywr bww•w~rwM MM•wrN r»•
~ rwrww•1••ww
l f wrrw
'I Nw ti Iy~l~i 1 Md11fTY tw
31 ! I I ty rw MlUMINAQV FLAT ANO
+ •
/I OCKVW IELL W44W PLAN
WW
y ~•a 0~ ooNrvetL HMICANDS
\ ".fe.rll pn.r•+lti.a Ilf11.17CM
I . wwy
• 1111 ~ , y~ ~r •4l MA. t.. M•Br. MItY r.+flr
~S 1 • t ~ ~ .f rrt•U•11•••Nf M•41M
PF F,
•
~ 1 J
\ 1 • ~ t f l tit -i !
1 rrr,
~r ~ ~ _ •+y ~ nt _ i'" r " sl
J1 1 9
00
1
t,~ , ~l t to
41
t l l 1 1 ~ t
N I 1 • I
1 / w•~
~i 31 t " / I '1 r~
P i Z Mlmutt:
Ptbrus " 27, 1983
Page 2
III. Public Hearings
A. r L. 171S. This is the petition of R. 0. McDonnell
requesting a change in toniq from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) district
on a 39.4 acre tract located on the south side of PM 426
(East McKinney Street) approximately 2,ooo feet east of
Mayhill Road, If approved, the planned development will
permit the following land uses;
S.9 acres - commercial
33.S acres - duplex
As. Spivey stated there were two reply forms mailed to
property owners; none were returned.
Pablo Rubio of Burke Engineering, stated he is repre-
senting Mr. McDonnell and McDonnell Enterprises. He
stated he is proposing 5.9 acres of commercial along the
frontage of the property and 33.S acres of duplex. He
stated the proposed commercial development on the east
will consist of a church and on the west side, office-
warehouses.
Chairman commented staff is recommending some type of
storm drainage retention.
Mr. Rubio stated there is an existing stock tank where
the retention pond would be. He explained the location
and intent of the use of the pond.
No one spoke In favor or in opposition to the request.
As, Sppivey continued with the staff report that this
site is contained in a low intensity on the overall
concept plan of the Denton Development Guide, but is not
,ocated in a specific intensity study area. The araa is
relatively free of development at the present time;
therefore, a general intensity standard for the area
would not be exceeded if this request were approved.
She stated duplex or two-family (2-F) housing is
consistent with low intensity.srea policies as these
areas are set aside as the main residential areas of the
city. Tiie second portion of this request contains
approximately six acres of proposed commercial develop-
ment. She continued Development Guide policies restrict
office/retail/commercial concentrations in low intensity
areas to four acres in size. Approval of this request
would violate that policy. General retail or neighbor-
hood service zoning would be a more appropriate buffer
between the adjacent property proposed for two-family
use and East McKinney Street. Staff recommends approval
of 2-t715 with conditions.
Mr. ,McDonnell stated he is the owner of the addition
shown on the transparency map. He continued, on the
first tract, he is proposing a 60 foot wide concrete
parking lot for regular retail stores and will build a
fence between duplexes and the shopping area; on the
west side, retail warehouses. He stated there will be a
10 foot walk or covered porch in front of the shopping
strip, which will be a nice area with brick veneer.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
A r. LaPorte commented he would not be in favor of
approving the request ay is, and wondered if it could be
restricted to general retail with office/warehouse use.
P * 2 Minutes
hbruary 21'', 1985
Page 3
Mr. Morris stated the Ccssiissioa could ispose any
restrictions they wish.
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-1725 as a planned development to include gsnirai
retail with office/waretu►use use.
Mr. Ellison asked Mr. McDbnnell to explain the
office/werehouae section.
Mr. McDonnell stated the officer will front the street
and have windows and front doors, telophoaes, ust like
an office and will be atroactive. He stated t~s.y will
consist of electricians, plumbers, and carpet people,
mainly wholesale dealers.
On question frost Mr. Sidoc, Mr. McDonnell stated they
warehouses will be serviced from the back, but in a
common building with the offices,
Mr. Esau* ascondad the motion. Voce was called, and
( motion carried unanimously (7-0).
B. Z-1727. This is the petition of Hammett i Nash, Inc.
requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the light _ndustrial (LI) district on
a 50.1 acre tract located on the west side of Mayhill
Road 4,300 feet north of Interaeate 3$ North. If the
zoning change is approved, the property may be used for
any use permitted in the light industrial district by
the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
Ms. Spivey stated there were five reply forms mailed to
property owners; none were returned.
Ms. Mason Haggard and Mr. Don Cunninghan stated they are
property owners in the area and did not receive notices,
On question from chair, Ms. Spivey stated the roperry
is located 4300 fast north of 1-359, outside tie city
limits.
Mr. Ellison stated staff has a Joint petition for
annexation.
Ma. Haggard asked for the names on the mailing list.
Chairman Claiborne stated she could meet with Ms. Spivey
after the meeting to see the names on the mailing list.
Hardy Burka, an area attorney, stated he is representing
Hammett and Nash and he said as mentioned, they ure also
requesting annexation. He stated this changs from
aggricultural to light industrial is consistent with what
tl~e city plans aro for the area and the master plan for
light industrial. He stated Andrews is in the area and
there are utilities available and would ask for Commis-
sion's approval.
On qyuestion from chair, Mr. Burke stated no, there are
no definste plans. The property is located near the
railroad and we feel light industrial zoning would be
suitable.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Burke said no, all
utilities are not available, we will have to extend
lines for the sower.
t rf7
P i Z Minutes
March 13, 1965
Pa=s 2
• Staif is recommending anaexic$ the additional 100 acres
to incorporate all of the area vast of Mayhill Road.
He added high intensity Development Guide policies are
applicable to this area.
Ms. Mason Haggard, an area property owner, asked if it
would be required for the developer to build a fence.
Chairman Claiborne answered that will be discussed on
the zoning case which will also be heard at tnis meeting.
Mr. Ellison added City Council will consider all of the
annexation requests on March 19, 1985.
Mr. Escue made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of Hammett s Nash, Inc. and the City of Denton
For annexation of apppproximately 150 acres of land
located west of Mayhill Road, spproximatalyy 4,000 feet
north of I-35, and adjacent and north of the MKfmT Rail-
road (A-17). Seconded by Mr. Sidor and carried unan-
imously (6-0).
III. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the staff and approval
tnereof will be strictly on the basis of the staff recom-
mendation. Approval of the consent agenda suthorizee the
Director of Planning and Community Development or nis dsaig-
nee to proceed with each item in accordance with the staff
recommendation.
A. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the
Creekside Addition.
8. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the
Kelaos-Pitnec Addition.
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to approve the Consent
Agenda. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously
carried (6-0).
IV. Public Hearings
A. 1rL. 725. This is the petition 'of R. 0. McConnell
requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) district
on a 39.4 acre tract located on the south aide of FM 42u
(East McKinney Street) approximately 2,000 feet east of
Mayhill Road. If approved, the planned development will
permit the following land uses:
5.9 acres - general retail
53.5 acres - duplex
1.1s. Spivey stated there were five reply forms mailed
to property owners and none were returned.
Mr. Brian Burke stated as discussed at the previous
meeting, he `s representing the petitioner and ties
done the preliminary engineering including a preliminary
plat. He stated they would like to have frontage alon
McKinney Street. He stated tnay are raquestin# general
retail/office. He continued the warehouses will nave
otfice fron'Cs with storage in the back. He stated
Hr. McDonnell, petitioner, would also like to have a
cabinet shop, wholesale to builders with rear delivery
and shipment.
c*$
. S
P M Z "taut"
March 130 1985
Paige 3
.
Mr. Ellison replied, a Cabinet shop could not be
permitted, as it would require commercial zoning.
He added, Me. Spivey will explain what is required
to allow a cabinet shop.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Me. 3pivey stated, as Mr. Burke has indioated, this cede
was discussed at the last Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting. She continued, staff has readvertised the
zoning request to insure that proper notification of all
owners of land has been done. She stated the request is
basically the ease proposal as presented at the previous
meeting. She continued this site is in a low intensity
area, but is not located in a specific intensity study
area. The area is relatively fro* from development at
the present time, therefore, a general intensity stan-
dard for the area would not be exceeded if this request
were approved. She continued, she has talked with
Burke dngineering, and informed them that according to
the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance, a cabins. shop is
permitted in a commercial zone but not in a general
retail district, Staff would not be in favor of grant-
ing this additional exception to land uses permitted in
the general retail tons, as we feel it wou13 set a presi-
dent of commercial land uses at khts location which are
not suitable buffers for the duplex land use portion of
this r.equer,t. She stated staff recommends approval of
the ov&rall proposal with two conditions.
Mr. Burke offered no rebuttal, but commented he is open
to the Ccmmission desires and warts to 'oe consistent
with the regulattans.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-1725 with the following Conditionsi
1) A six (6) foot solid wood fence be erected along the
southern boundary of the general retail sections
2) office/retail/warehouse facilities 4ili be permitta.i
in 'Che approved planned development.
Mr. LaForte also commented he would not be opposed to a
cabinet shop, but feels petitioner shouli come back at a
later date with that change.
Mr. Bacue seconded the motion.
Mr,. Sidor asked for clarification. He stated he
understood petitioner had asked for commercial and the
Commission denied that and now he is asking for jeneral
retail in lie-x of commercial and Mr. Burke says their
intent all along wed for commercial uses. Staff is
recommending approval for general retail, and aske.i are
we recommending approval tar a cabinet shop?
'•fr. ^..ecue answered no.
Mr. LaPorte stated hs feels petitioner should come back
with that request.
was called and motion passel unanimously (6-0).
gar-+LR T'-rxj41'y is Zj ,!°P: N4^7 ;;iY°.ri. .'wvJIM
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1725
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION tIlDECIDED
None Received None Received
. ~Y
. , ~~.eL.ldXc..
1
i
S ~ ~ J
7 ~
i"-
t Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
December 4, 1915
The regular meeting of the Planninl and Zoniny Commission of the
City of Denton, Texas was held on Nednesday, December 4, 1985, at
5:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Keith Appleton, EuIine Brock, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr.,
Gary Juren, and Tom Pearson
Absent: Bill Claiborne
Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey,
Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Steve
Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation; Joe Morris,
Assistant Cityy Attorney; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Ray
Rumfield, Civil Engineer; and Susan Mitchell, Secretary
Vice-Chairman R. B. Escue, Jr. called the ■eeting to order.
1. MINUTES: It was moved by Mr. ,;uren, seconded by Ms. Cole,
'a-n-T 'unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of November 6, 1985.
II. CONSENT AGENDA: It was moved by Ms, Cole seconded by
r1 . rosrson and unanimously carried (6.01 to approved the
consent agenda as follows:
A. Approval of final plat of the Forrestridge Addition,
Section III, Blocks P, G and H.
111. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(R Z-1725. Petition of R. 0. McDonnell requesting a change
T Toning from the agricultural 'A) classification to
the planned development (PD) district on a 39.4 acre
tract located on the south side of FM 426 (East McKinney
Street) approximately 2,000 feet east of Mayhill Road,
if approved, the planned development will permit the
following land uses:
5.9 acres eneral retail
33.5 acres - uplex
Five notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposi-
tion.
PETITIONER: None present.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this property
was part r"an annexation approved by the City Council
in 1985. He said that due to a technical problem with
advertising, staff is resubmitting the annexation and
zoning petitions to the Plannin and Zoning Commission
and City Council for consideration. He said that zoning
was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission by a
vote of 6-0 and b the City Council on Jone 4, 1985. He
stated that the Final action of the annexation is sched-
uled for January 21, 1986. He added that staff recommends
approval.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Pearson atoved to recommend approval of
Z=TTT"ubject to the following coo4itions: 6
..tea ,+r^+,a-~ ~v e~:;,,.~r'•'~l,',:'~t:'g4 r, wear ~r aw=•, +:-r~g3yrs'S,•~4, - `",~e~ngr;,,,: y3.4 r , .<i ~r ' s
~ sn,r
P 1 Z Minutes
December 4, 1985
Page 1
t
1. "A six'(6) foot solid wood (once be erected aloi-g the
southern boundary of the general retail section.
2. Office/retail/warehouse facilities will be permitted
in the general retail section of the planned develop-
ment.
3. A comprehensive site plan must be approved before
plats are approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council.
Seconded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (6-0).
8. Z-1727. Petition of Hammett 8 Nash, Inc. requesting a
~Iw in zonin from the a ricultural (A) classification
to To planned levelopment IPD) district for light indus-
trial (LI) uses on a 50,1 acre tract located on the west
side of Mayhill Rued 49300 feet north of Interstate 3S
North.
Two notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposi-
tion.
PETITIONER: None present.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this property
was pa o an annexation approved by the City Council
in June of 1985. He said that due to a technical prob-
lem with advertising, staff is resubmitting the annexa-
tion and zoning petitions to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council for consideration. He said
that zoning was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission by a vote of 6.0 and by the City Council on
June 4, 1985. He stated that final action of the annex-
ation is scheduled for January 21, 1986. He added that
staff recommends approval.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Pearson moved to recommend approval of
Z-17V gubject to the following conditions:
1. The following land uses shall not be permitted in the
approved planned development.
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip or
Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete latching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln ov Tile Plant
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sapp, Caliche, Stone, Clay or
Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatch^ry, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery and Sales and Storage
Home ,or Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric
Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding elant, Pont or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for tags or Machinery, etc
C:..y,~" ~y w.,..V, ,...,+ei,~--Fn' ; .`+"f.-I=r, ,;}••,-rqT-ye,~: .'.~Y,'
NO. ORDINANC
AMENDtAG
THE
CITY
DENT AS SAME WAGE ADOPTED AS ANZONING
APPENDIX TO TNR CODE OF ORDINNANCRS OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCR no. 69-1, AS AHENDED, AND
AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 39.478 ACRES OF LAND LOCATRD ON TU SOUTH
SIDE OF F.M. 426 (EAST MCKINNEY STRRET), BRING ,APP1t03UK4TELY 2,000
FEET EAST OF MAYHILL ROAD. .t8 IB MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CPUA'p6 IN ZONI*I CLASSIFICATION FtOM
AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT 174M62FICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLABSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR PENALTY IN A KUIMUM AMOK OF
'1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the zoning classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-wit:
TRACT All that certain tract or parcel of laud sit"ted in
oc of the Morreau Forrest Survey, Abstract Number 417 Denton
County, Texas; the said tract being a part of the called 86.768
acre tract described in the deed Zrom }teary S. Miller Company to
R. 0. McDonnell, at ux recorded in Volume 1200, Page 462 of the
Dead Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being sore .
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING for the most southerly southwest cotaer of the tract
being described herein, at a fence corner post for the most
southerly southwest corner of the said McDonnell Tract save being
a re-entrant corner of the tract described in the deed from Felix
Callahan, at ux to Ann C. Stark, at al recorded in Volume 1023,
Page 630 of the said Deed Records and being on the occupied south
line of the said M. Forrest Survey and the north line of the
Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract Number 1330;
THENCE north 01°00'46" west with the vest line of the McDonnell
Tract and along a fence a distance of 798.58 feet to s fence
corner post at a re-entrant corner of said tract;
THENCE north 88°07'49" west along a fence a distance of 158.15
feet to a fence corner post at the swot westerly southwest corner
of the said McDonnell Tract sea being the southeast corner of
the tract described in the Deed to N^xshal Eugene Mauihaa, at ux
recorded in Volume 997, Page 777 of tft: said Dead Records;
THENCE northerly with the west line of the said McDonnell Tract
and along a wira fence the following 3 calls:
1. north 01°00'54" east a distance of 692.37 feat to an
Rpparent angle point;
2. north 00°14'47" west a distance of 321.99 foot to an
apparent angle point;
3. north 01°11'58" vast a distance of 294.35 feet to as
iron rod found at a Peace corner oo the south right of
way of F.M. 720, as occ"iod, for the northwest corner
of the sal'' MaAon"ll Tract, the said iron rod Wag 3
feet northerly ".roes another few* a'oraer poet;
THENCE, southeasterly with the southerly right of way of r.M. 720
and the northerly line of the McDonnell Tract the following 3
calla;
1. south 86°18'50" rant a distance of 430.47 feet to an
iron rod set at en angle point in the said line and
being near an iron rail fence;
2. south 46°33'48" east &long and near the said iron rail
fence a distance of 411.+0 feet to a right of way
marker at an angle point in the said line;
3. south 63°44'11" east along and near the said fence a
distance of 219.92 feet to an iron rod set for the
northeast corner of tho herein described tract;
THENCE south 00°10'40" west, severing the said McDonnell Tract,..a
distance of 867.64 feet to an iron rod set for an angle point in
this line;
THENCE south 01°00'46" west, continuing across the said McDonnell
Tract, and passing at 137.19 feet to an iron rod not for the
northwest corner of a certain Tract 11 of 0.334 of an acre, and
continuing along the same course, in all, a total distance of
798.58 feet to an iron rod set near an old wire fence on the south
line of the said McDonnell Tract; same being the south line of the
said M. Forrest Survey, as occupied:
THENCE north 89°30'13" west with the said south line of the
McDonnell Tract and along the general course of tho said old wire
fence a distance of 812.67 feet to the place of beginning and
enclosing 39.478 acres of land;
is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification
and Use des..tgnation to Planned Development "PD" District
Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning
ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION 11.
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of any building within the planned development district, the
following conditions shall be met!
A. a six (61) foot solid wood fence shall be erected
slon ;he southern boundary of the general retail
sect on;
B. That the area designated as Sections 2 3 and 4 on
the attached site plan for two-family dwellings
shall tie developed in accordance with the zoning
regulations applicable to two-family zoning
districts insofar as such regulations aro not
inconsistent with the attached site plan for such
area and use.
SECTION 111.
A. That the City Council approves the comprehensive site plan
for the area designated as Sections 2, 3 and 4 on the
attached site plan for two-family dwellings with the
conditions and regulations herein stated.
Z-1725/PACE 2
I That prior to any development or construction within the
area designated on the attached site plan for general
retail (OR), a comprehensive site plan for such area shall
be submitted for approval in accordance with the
procedures required for approval of planned development
districts. The proposed comprehensive site plan for the
area designated as general retail shall be restricted to
proposed uses for retail and office-showroom warehouses.
C. That the approval of the district showing a general retail
area on the attached site plan, shall not, and in not
intended to, be deemed approval of such designated area
for any particular land use, but shall be construed only
to mean that uses allowed in general retail zoning
i districts on the date such comprehensive site plan is
II submitted, may be considered as possible appropriate uses
of such designated area at the time such plan is submitted
therefore, and approval thereof may be determined upon
consideration of such factors which may include, but not
be limited to. the time elapsed from the effective date
of this ordinance and the date such comprehensive site
lan is submitted for such area,, the number of proposed
buildings, dwelling units or proposed uses; the
arrangement and design of the buildings, streets, parking
areas, utilities and other development features; and the
proposed regulations to be applied to such area.
5ECT10N IV.
That the development of thr property shall be in substantial
c,>mpliance with the comprehensive site plan attached hereto or any
comprehensive site plan hereafter approved for any part of the
district and made a part hereof for all purposes,
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, as amended,
be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District
Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and
specifications.
SECTION V,
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the ppurpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION Vt.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or
faile to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof,
or of a permit or certificate Lssued thereunder, shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand
Dollars (41,040.00). Each such person shall Us deemed guilty of a
seiarate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during
S whch any violation of this ordinance Le committed, or continued,
and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be
punished within the limits above.
2-1125/PAGE 3
I
SECTION VII.
That Ordinance No. 85-152 is hereby repealed,
SECTION VtII.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passaSs, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this nrdinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, ,he official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
DEBRA ADAMI DHAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY s Q {,-~.~1~~,
v-1725/PAGE 4
wwr • rMM.wiw"., wr/w~' +rw'• .M+//
j` /l`.'.~,•+~ seam"
^'9 IIYM.w r0 M'h M M ,MYti=IM
/ 1A.1 11/1.
1 4 I I tit /n/wg11
{N 11...d w.n Iw.I Nr Nfwa w...1
r 1 Y uwww
I
/~1 1 1~ rr S rM1/111/M/ /<A1 am
mama M~ft~
. f'v' I NM. /MIwY YrF1/11.114 M~1
•f 1
' ~f ~ i 1 1 ~ 7
nl:
11l 1,' ` •n . 11 o14
1
l 1 /
h 1 1 . . 1 1 ~ \
• . 1 (1 » a
f V I ~ it
rr.,
+ f i 1 1 • ~ 1 r 1 ,
/ / V r 1 /IIV
1 1
' t 1 r1 ~ r { M i
41
1
i
Y
1 f;.1
DATE: 01/21/86
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ZONING CASE Z-1727
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of December 41 1985, and voted to recommend approval of
Z-1727.
SUMMARY:
This is a request for a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
to the planned development (PD) district on a 50,1 acre tract on the
west side of Mayhill Road approximately 4,300 feet north of I-35N.
BACKGROUND:
This request is consistent with the Development Guide policies for
high intensity areas. The planned development will enable the City
to restrict certain "undesirable land uses" in this area and ensure
more efficient planning of the infrastructure of this portion of the
city. Due to a technical problem with the annexation of the zoning
case is being presented for reconsideration.
PROGJRAMS,, DEPARTM$NUIS_ OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Two (2) property owners within 200 feet were notified.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
t :
e
R pectf lyt
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
Prepared by:
0 U6 Qh ab,~-
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Appr ed
Jeff Key
Director of Planning
and Development
0900]
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z--1727 Meeting Date: January 21; 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Hammett and Nash, Inc,
223 W. Hickory
Denton, TX 76201
Strit'us of Applicant: Engineer
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) classification
to the planned development (PD)
district
Location: West side of Mayhill Road,
approximately 4,300 feet north of
1-35N
Size: Approximately 50,1 acres
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surroundi«g Land Use
and Zoning: North - Agricultural, vacanto A
South - Agriculturalo A, outside city
limits
East - Vacanto S^165 (Allan Estates
Mobile Home Park),
agricultural
West - Vacant
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated high intensity,
L
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: It is recommended that detention be
used to handle large amounts of
run-off,
(Case Z-1727)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATIO14 (Continued)
Utilities: water line on Ma hill Road
ronta a is too small t Road
liter
or th s developmen . rlp e
water line extension on Shady oaks
and south along Loop 288 to Spencer
Road may be tied onto and extended
west along Spencer Road to Mayhill
Road and south across this property
frontage, A proposed 12" water line
will extend to the southeast corner
of this development. Sewer service
is currently not available in this
area. The Pecan Creek outfall line
crosses Mayhill Road approximately
4,000 feet north of this site.
Electric service is available to the
site.
Transportation: Perimeter street paving regulations
will apply on Mayhill Road. Interior
streets should match proposed streets
in the planned development tracts to
the west and the south. The proposed
southern alignment of Loop 288 will
run through the eastern end of this
tract. The Thoroughfare Plan shows
an east-west collector street runnint
through the center of this tract.
Sidewalks will be required on all
collector sized or grsater streets.
HISTORY
The property was part of an annexation approved by the City
Council in June 71 1985. Due to a technical problem with
advertising, Staff is resubmitting the annexation and zoning
petitions to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council
for consideration. The zoning was approved by the Planning and
Zoning Commission by a vote of 6 to 0 and by the City Council on
June 4, 1985. The final action on the annexation is scheduled
for January 21, 1985.
ANALYSIS
This fifty acre tract is located in an area designated as one of
three high intensity or mayor activity centers. Little ur no
(Case 3-1727)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (Continued)
control of intensity is proposed for major activity centers. In
general, high intensity areas area expected to be the major
industrial, commercial and employment centers of the City. More
particularly, land use diversity is encouraged in these areas.
The Golden Triangle Mall major activity center is identified as
the dominant center for the City in the Denton Development Guide.
Late last year, a 300 acre planned development for light
industrial, commercial and multi--family land uses was approved
to the west and the south of this site, A request for
unrestricted zoning on that tract was denied by the City
Council. The approved planned development will enable the City
to restrict certain "so called" undesirable land uses in this
area and ensure more efficient planning of the major roads,
drainage and utility systems for this area. The light
industrial (LI) land use requested on this fifty acre tract is
compatible with surrounding zoning and Denton Development Guide
policies for high intensity areas.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of
Z-1727 at its December 4, 1985 meeting with the following
conditions,by a vote of 6-0.
1. The following land uses shall not be permitted in the
approved PDc
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go--Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or
Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for Rags or Machinery, etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
(Came z-1727)
Page Dour
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stabla, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Outside a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
2. A comprehensive site plan must be approved by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council before plats will be
approved.
3. A 6 foot solid wood fence shall be erected between the
petitioner's property and the Mason Haggard property. The
fence shall be erected before any construction or
development occurs.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Approve PD with conditions
3. Approve petition with additional conditions
44 Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map
PD Canc.pt Plan
3. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the meeting of
March 13, 1985.
4. Reply Form Totals
5. Mailing List
6. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the meeting of
December 4, 1985.
0683s
i
f
PO- TO 1
i
00
t~
A r ' LI SM
I f
Z -1727
1 '
S-163
I / l
♦ 1
P0.20 ~
I~
i
/
1 12
f A ~ S-11f~
1111,111 1, IMI
M 111,1
n" tNN N W rim WWI 11 m N1n ams lowo, W 1Nft
W. NNN tM11~ 1141.
W NII 4001.10 Moo a INfll a IM INNNI N w WII
1 MOO WWI,. I44"1 W. Witt 1MN. INn, "M W N 1
1f11/1( nNIN IfY1Nl W" Y! Ifilit fU W N nN 1. N~1, A.
1 11 lm M{lfl IN .III N M 1111 W N / 1111, WNW
N MAIN NI. 1W IN, ON MOM N 141%1 l . NN t w1
N 1116., 11µ1N1 N MN NYI YINI N t I fµ,11. I
.1NIIt, 11 n N YM 1, NIIW M NN ❑W NNW 1 M
IN NI N NI INq NINNI N n1W 111. P.1 ln. IN
INN6N INN 1t1IN. IN NIt Nt1 ,111 NNIIIII N
IM IIMI
^YZ
wI I' If ti MINYI If11n N 411 f/, N III, NY 11 II
~ IIw 411 ~~IIW lIN N M I. IWI Mff1 AN N 0N111
rolel INN II 111 0011 1111LT1 11 fNNN NII RN I Net I
.F "f~ 1 .•..IN11N 1111.4611roYlIN n.i
V y~
f 11111 NMNn N IIIIVAI N wNN InI I INfNn n
y .pa~IT.•NItT 4 Y"Off 111n
.y IM IIY f1 M 1NN HN N Nn N ILN
-._.W..____.k
J ' n 4 1 W" 11 I 1NN11 of 111Nf1 oi wo" NII YK [A,IN
I j1l I ~ lYllln IM 611µf1 N 1111.11 Ilf, 0 N a Y IW Ilp
INII "04 01 N1NI1 N.INNI N IMNN fill I IINNII N
.»,I nit w N IM it.,
YY WNI NM it fNM1 II IIw11 N MnN1 µf1 I NIfN[f M
1( III3, Mt N Y INI In 11 M Wf NNNI1 /1t N VN 1.
INN Nf111 09 MMILL Willi
,INI MfI1 06 WWI " N MItNN A NII L.11 Nn
ii■ ,i1T'el' ,INN IM Y N1n NY 1 f11fltt/ M "a 6 W P9,
I N Y INI IN
ACIIE9 N1t w ffNNN tINN N u11 u YN »
WWI INn of ww/ N 04,11111 N f11w If11 YNf NMII
INN AY M 1111 WMAl Ilff a NN I. Nef MNI t
.IINMI N Pon a Itll N fill NIN M W1.1% In 1NINIINt
LqM M It 1111 4111 m
41 0 M1f/1N1 !U+'1' NkM
"1'
follow I
Akio
AMMEAiOIgv 6 1gWAK7 ASAI
Nil
MAMAICTi E NASNI N1C bpMlT! Ao+K The
,.__.._.._._~_r __.._..u. AI11J. ANy~
off (gNlUl TINE (Ilp/[l.R~ d 1/(C1~IB 0" Hk* 'n Nod -
t,111M1 It I.iy IttINOII, ffflM NM roi 1lef _ ~ TMN 1~ •
Mw-
b•17~7
p is Z Minutes
February 27, 1985
Pass 3
Mr. Morris stated the Commission could impose any
restrictions they wish.
Mr. L4Forte made a motion to recommend approval of
2-1725 as a planned development to include general
retail with office/warehouse uoe.
Mr. Ellison asked Mr. rcDonnell to explain the
office/warehouse section.
Mr. McDonnell stated the offices will front the street
and have windows and front doors, telephones, uat like
an office and will be attractive. He stated tAs y will
consist of electricians, plumbers, and carpet people,
mainly wholesale dealers.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr, McDonnell stated the
warehouses will be serviced from the back, but in a
common building with the offices.
Mr. Escue seconded the motion. Vote was called, and
motion carried unanimously (7.0).
R.. 2-1727. This is the petition of Hammett it Nash, Inc.
requesting a change in zoning from the aggricultural (A)
classification to the light industrial (LI) district on
a 50.1 acre tract located on the west aide of Mayhill
Road 4,300 feet north of Interstate 35 North. If the
zoning change is approved, the property may be used for
any use parmittad in the light industrial district by
the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
Ms. Spivey stated there were five reply fot,-%s mailed to
property owners; none were returned.
Me. Mason Haggard and Mr. Don Cunninghan stated they are
property owners in the area and did not receive notices.
On queation from chair, Ms. Spivey stated the property
is located 4300 feet north of I-35E, outside the city
limits.
Mr. Ellison stated staff has a Joint petition for
annexation.
11s. Haggard asked for the nanos on the mailing list.
Chairman Claiborne stated she could meet with Ms. Spivey
after the meeting to see the names on the mailing list.
Hardy Burke, an area attorndy, stated he is representing
Hammett and Nash and he said as mentioned, they are also
requesting annexation. He stated this change from
agricultural to light industrial is consistent with what
the city plane are for the area and the master plan for
light industrial. He stated Andrews is in the area acid
them are utilities available and would ask for Commis-
sion a approval.
4n cuestion from chair, Mr. Burke stated no, there are
no definate plans. The property is located near the
railroad and we feel light industrial zoning would be
suitable.
Un question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Burke said no, all
utilities are not available, we will have to extend
lines for the sewer.
P A Z Mie.utes
February 27, 148S
Page 4
Mr. Sidor commentad to Mr. Burke, staff is recommendin
a planned development and asked if he or his client hal
any objections.
Mr. Burke said no. Mr. Nash said he would prefer this
be zoned light industrial and if there's anything the
Commission would want to exclude, we could discuss it.
Mr. LaPorte asked if this request could be approved as
a planned development for llyht industrial uses and with
the restrictions as suggested by staff.
Mr. Ellison commented conditions could not be required
for straight zoning.
Mr. Pearson commented the loop 288 extension is supposed
to come in front of this property, and asked about ease-
ments.
Mr. Ellison explained at the time of platting the proper
easement would be required or dedicated.
Ms. Mason Haggard stated her property joins this
property on the north and would like to ask if apart-
ments are going to be built that a fence be built
between her property and the proposed for protection of
their animals and satli children.
Ms. Spivey stated this 50 acre tract is located in an
area designated as one of the three high Intensity or
major activity centers. She stated little or no control
of intensity is proposed for ma or activity centers.
She stated last year City Coune~l approved 300 acres of
multi family, commercial, and light industrial with a
list of undesireable land uses in this area. She stated
straight zoning is consistent with the Development Guide
policies, but staff is recommending a planted
development.
Mr. LaPorte asked it tabled, what would the cost to the
city be to readvertise this request.
As. Spivey stated she couldn't give an exact amount, but
it would be minimal.
Mr. LaPorte asked if the Commission could vote on the
request as a planned development and readvertise before
it goes to City Council.
Mr. Morris stated the Commission could vote on a planned
development for light industrial uses with all the
provisions for light industrial with the exceptions
provided in the staff's report only if the petitioner
agrees.
Mr. Burke stated he has no rebuttal and would agree to
a planned develoent for light industrial with the cond-
itions provided for by the staff and a fence if apart-
ments are proposed to be built.
Mr. Morris commented the proposed plannea development
ordinance does require a proposed site plan.
P Z Minutes
February 27, 1985
Pav S
Brian Kurtz a city employee for the Parks and
Recreation bepartment and a graduate student of North
Texas State University asked if the newly annexed
property owners would be allowed to speak,
Chairman Claiborne said as Mr. Ellison explained,
notices will be sent to property owners prior to and
no final action will be taken before annexation.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. lightiindustrialtconing iasnit is less restrict.tva tthan
commercial.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to rscommand approval of Z-1727
as a planned develoqppment for light industrial uses, with
the following conditionat
1) The following land uses shall not be permitted:
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dormitory, 8oardin or Rooming Houso
Dump or Sanitary F111 Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Ssnd, CaLicha, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway Louse
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Storagga Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic. Narcotic or
Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for hags or Machinery etc
Petroleum Collecting ur torage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
SLnd caravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stabie, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Outside a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
2) That a six foot (61) solid wood fence be urrected
between the residential area and Ms. Mason Haggard's
property on the north, before any development or
construction takes place.
Mr. LsForte made a motion to amend the original motion
that a six foot (b') solid wood fence be errected only
if residential uses are proposed. Seconded by Mr.
Pearson.
P 6 Z Minutes
February 27, 1983
Page 6
Mr. Morrie stated he would auggeat a specific site plan
be approved by this Commission.
Mr. Sidor accepted the addition to the motion. Vote was
LS lled and motion carried unanimously (7-0).
C. Recommend approval of final replat of the Owsley Park
Addition, Block 11, Lot 12A.
Mr. Persaud stated this is a tract of 0.36 acres
situated north of and abutting Prairie Street and
east of Bonnie Brae. He stated athe tract is zoned
residential multi-family (MF-1) and multi-family develop-
ment is anticipated. Thfput ose of the re let is to
remove the existing lot ine o create one wilding
site. Development Review Committee recommends approval.
Mr. Rubio stated he is representing the developer and
the purpose is to make one lot out of two.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition Vo the request.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte made a notion to recommend approval of the
Owsley Park Addition, Lot 12-A Block 11. Seconded by
Mr. Eacue and unanimously carr~ed (7.0).
D. Recommend approval of final replat of the Thompson
Addition, Phase 1, Lot I.
Mr. Persaud e.tated this is a tract of 1.79 acres
situated west of and abutting Old North Road, north
of U,S. Highway 380 . The site is zoned for multi-
family development and residential multi-family develop-
ment is anticspated. He continu®d, the purpose of the
replat is to abandon an existing easement which is not
required to service tnis development. Development
Review Committee recommends approval.
No of.e spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
C,fair declared the public hearing closed.
Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend approval of the
final replat of the Thompson Addition, Phase 1, Lot 1.
Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried (7-0).
E. Recommend approval of a proposed ordinance that would
repeal paragraph B of Article 21 of w~nendix B-Zoning of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Vinton relating to
the approval by the City Council of plats of subdivisions
within an area where annexation proeiedings are pending;
and providing An effective date.
Mr. Persaud read paragraph B, Article 21, of the Zoning
Ordinance, "The Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Denton shall not approve any plat of any subdivi-
sion within any area where a petition or orJinanee for
annexation to Cha City of Denton is pending before the
City Council, unless and until such plat shall have been
approved by resolution of the City Council.
He cont:nuod, under provisions in Article 974 (a) of
Texas Revised Civil Statues, the Planning andLoing
Commission shall have the power to approve plats of
subdivisions, within 30 days of their filing unless,
P 4 Z Minutes
March 130 1955
Page 4
• a. 21727. This is the petition of Hammett i Nash, Inc.
requesting a change in toning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PO) district
for light Industrial (LI) uses on a 50,1 acre tract
located on the west side of Mayhill Road 4,300 feet
north of Interstate 35 North,
Ms. Spivey stated there were two reply forms mailed to
property ownerst one was returned in favor and zero in
opposition.
Mr. Hardy Burke stated originally this was a request for
light industrial zoning and it has now been changed to a
planned development for light industrial uses with a
List of prohibited uses He explained the tocatton of
the property and the railroad which cones in on a spur
to this pproperty. He commented if developed as a
residential area, we would construct a fence between
this property 1 the Mascn Haggard property as per Ms.
Haggard's rec ,at.
Chairman asked Mr. Burke if he would consider
constructing a fence regardless of the land use.
He asked about a six (6) foot screening device.
Mr. Berke stated they would prefer a chain link rather
then a wood fence as it would require less maintenance.
Me. Haggard stated she resides adjoining this property
and she plans to reside there, therefore the reason for
requesting a fence.
On question from Mr. LaPorte, Ms. Haggard stated yes,
she would like a wj(>d fence.
Ms. Haggard indicated on the map the location of her
property and said they are requesting a zoning change on
part of her property. She also indicated on the map
where she would like the fence to be constructed.
Ms. Spivey stated staff has readvertised the zoning
request to insure that proper notification of all owners
of land has bean done. She continued, this 50 acre
tract is located in an area designated as one of threo
high intensity or major activity centers. She stated
little Dr no control of intensity is proposal for major
activity centers) in general, hi ;h intensity areas are
expected to be the major industrial, commercial and
employment centers of the city. She added the light
industrial land use requested on this 50 acre tract is
compatible with surrounding zoning and Denton DeveLop-
ment Guile policies for high intensity areas. She alea
added that condition number two could be amended to
read, "any land use" rathnr than limited to construction
if residential uses are proposed. Staff recommends
approval with two conditions.
Mr. Sidor commented someone should define Ehe necessity
for the fence. He asked if residential .fevelopment
occurs on the south side of this 50 acre tract, Yhoul9
a fence be constructed on the north side. Chairman
answered yes.
Mr. Sidor asked if the petitioner is proposing
residential use. Mr. Burke answerei no, they are not.
a
P 4 Z Minutes
March L3, 1985
Page 5
Mr. Burin offered no rebuttal, but added he would like
to request a chain link or wire fence with metal posts
as it would be 1000 maintenance. He stated if any of
the tract is used for residential purposes, they will
construct a fence.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Chairman Claiborne commented he feels the issue is,
what type of fencing should be required. He continued
it would appear for the privacy of the adjoining land
owners, they may want a solid wood fence with any land
use.
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of
1 Z-1727 with the following conditions:
1) The following uses shall not be permitted in the
approved PD:
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Aspnalt or Concrete hatching Plant (permanent)
Brack Kiln or 'file Plant
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Zrea
cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Natchary, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or
Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pons or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Oalvage Yard for Rags or Machinery, etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Privatu Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand Gravel or L'arth Sales or Storage
Stabia0 Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Uutside a Building
Theater, Drive-1n
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
2) A six (6) foot solid wood fence shall be erected
between the petitioner's property and the Mason
Haggard property if residentia) uses are proposed.
The fence shall be erected before any construction
or development occurs.
Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (6.0).
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1727
IN FAVOR III OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received None Received
to,
r
Wy~
f 'r ox ~y
NEW
P 4 Z Minutes
December 4, 1985
Page 2
t•
1. "A six (6) foot solid wood fence be erected along the
southern boundary of the general retail section,
2. Office/retail/warehouse facilities will be permitted
in the general retail section of the planned e'evelop-
ment.
1. A comprehensive site plan must be approved before
plats are approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council.
econded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (6-0).
t-1727. Petition of Hammett A Nash, Inc. requesting a
in aonin` from the a ricultursl (A) classification
to"t a planned `development (PD) district for light indus-
trial (LI) uses on a 50.1 acre tract located on the west
side of Mayhill Road 4,100 feet north of interstate SS
North.
Two notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposi-
tion.
PETITIONER: None present.
INY FAVOR, None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
TAPF REPORT. Mr. Ellison stated that this property
waspa part an annexation approved by the City Council
in June of 1985. He said that due to a techniq,ol prob-
lem with advertising, staff is resubmitting thct annexa-
tion and toning petitions to the Planning and Uning
Commission and City Council for consie%ration. Pe said
that toning was approved by the Planning and Zoniti
Commission by a vote of 6.0 and by the City Counc?1 on
June 4 1985. He stated that final action of the annex-
ation Is scheduled for January 21, 1986. He added that
staff recommends approval.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Pearson moved to recommend approval of
7=T777-Tubfect to the following conditions:
1. The following land uses shall not be permitted in the
approved planned development.
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip or
Commercial Racin
Asphalt or Concrete fetching Plant (permanent)
trick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone, Clay or
Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
HLuline or Storage Cosny
Heavy Machinery and Sapales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric
Patients 1
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Savage Yard for Rags or Machinery, etc
`.s„M4gKW s-'a° --•)c, r-..,y t .a a
i
P 8 Z Minutes
December 4, 1985
Page 3
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand Gravel or Barth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Ss199 of Furniture or Appliances Outside
a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
2, A comprehensive site plan must be approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council be-
fore plats will be approved.
3. A six (6) foot solid wood fence shall be erected be-
tween the petitioner's property and the Mason Haggard
property. The fence shall be erected before any con-
struction of development occurs.
Seconded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (6-0).
C. Z-1742. Petition of Tommy Corporation N.V., represented
By Fields, Edwards 4 Asso-~~tes, Inc., requesting a change
In Boning from the a rice ,ral (A) classification to the
planned development (PD) classification on 60,38 acres.
The property is located north and east of Edwards Road and
shown in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract No, 1330, The
following land uses are proposed for the planned develop-
ment:
Single Family (SP-7) - 25,0 acres
density 4,5 units per acre, total units 113
Zero Lot Line - 13,0 acres
density 6,1 units per acre, total units 79
Multi-Family - 13.7 acres
density 1S units per acre, total units ZOS
Eight notices were mailed to property owners within 100
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposition,
PRTITIONER: None present,
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
Sidi REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this property
WT-3 ar o an annexation approved by the City Council
in 1985. He said that due to a technical problem with
advertising, staff is resubmitting the annexation and
toning petitions to the Planning and Zoningg Commission
and City Council for consideration. He seid that zoning
was ap- Droved by the Planning and Zoning Commission by a
vote of 6.0 and by the City Council on June 4, 1985. He
stated that final action of t'ne annexation is scheduled
for January 21, 1986, He added that staff recommends
approval.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Ms. Cole moved to rat-ommead approval of 2-1742
O6jecf to the following conditions:
1. A comprehensive site plan must be approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
y
.c f,i .~F <f k. 1 `•34•; SF ilT "-'7R' P [l .tt rj ^ 1 '^Y R f.. ..P'ril..
11.34E go 0
NO,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
A
THE
S SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF Of DENT AS SAIDYMAP APPLIIEES TOO 50.1576 RACl1NE8 Of LAND4LOCATED AMENDED,
WEST
SIDE OF MAYHILL ROAD 41300 FEET NORTH OF INTERSTATE 35 NORTH, AS
M
ZONING
ORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN CLAS CLASSIFICAT ONSIANDAUSE DESIGNATION~TOC PLLA tNNEED DEVAIILOPMEDISTR
"ppT
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIONATION; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ;1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS!
SECTION 1.
Tnat the zoning classification and use designation of bne
following described property, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the David
certain u(aalf ) Abstract 4S 30 aare, tract deed dtyby Fred N, Stones, l Jr. of
to
Lynn Mallow and wife on the 31st day of January 1455, recorded in
Volume 4070 Pass 236, Deed Records of said County, and a part of a
certain (tailed) 40 acre treat deeded by C. G. !laggard, a widower
Kaya1947,M recorded in Volms wife ?a * 430p Deed Records of said
County, and being more fully describe as follows:
BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said 45.30 acre tract in the
east boundary Iii:.* of the D, Hough Survey and in Mayhill Road;
THENCE south 87°53018" west near a fence a distance of 1821.56
feet to an iron pia;
THENCE north 02°0000" east a distance of 1080.0 feet to an iron
pin in the south line of said 40 acre treat;
THENCE north 81°42'00" *set along common property line a distance
of 1141.37 feet to an iron pin;
THENCE north 01°58'30" seat a distance of 320.0 feet to an iron
Pin;
THENCE north 87°42'00" east a distance of 680.63 feet to an iron
in is the east boundary line of said D. Hough S~Arvey in Hayhill
Road;
THENCE south 01°58'30" west along said survey line and said road a
distance of 320.0 feet to an iron pin being the southeast corner
of said 40 acre tract,
THENCE south 02'00100" west along Mayhill Road and the east
boundary line of said D. Hough Survey a distance of 1086.0 feet to
the point of beginning and containing 50.1576 acres of land.
is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Class ifisation
and Use designation to Planned Development "PD" District
Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive toning
ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION 11.
That prior to the beginning of any construction or development
within the district created herein; and prior to the iseusaae of
di - 701
E. n
. . .sip
I
• any building permits for buildings therein, the following
conditions shall be nett
A. A comprehensive site plan for the district shall be submitted
for approval in compliance with Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning
of the Code of ordinances. None of the following listed land
uses shall be pormitted in the district and no such uses shall
be shown as proposed uses on such comprehensive site plan:
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip or Commercial [lacing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tilt Plant
Dormitory, Boardin or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Calichs, Stone, Clay or Gravel
FairfL'ounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
I Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Store • Company
Heavy Machinery ales and Storage
Hose for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric Patients
E Livestock Auction
I Livestock reading Plant, Pont or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
open Salvage Yard for Rags or Machinery etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
i Rodeo Grounds
Sand Gravel or earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of furniture or Appliances Outside a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire its-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Case or Mobile Hass Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
t Used Auto Parts Sales
B. A six (6) foot solid wood fence shall be erected between the
petitioner's property and the Mason Haggard property. The
fence shall be erected before any construction or development
occurs.
C. That the approval of the district showing a designated light
! industrial use on the attached site plan, shall not, and is not
intended to, be dewed appproval of any particular land use is
such district, but shall be construed only to swan that those
uses, otherwise permitted in light industrial soniag districts,
exclusive of the listed prohibited uses in this ordinance, may
be considered as possible appropriate uses for the district at
the time the comprehensive site plow in submitted therefore,
the approval thereof being based upon relevant factors which
may include, but not be limited to: the time elapsed from the
effective date of this ordinance to the date the co~rehensive
site plan for the district is submitted; the number o! proposed
buildings or dwelling units and proposed uses; the arrangement
and design of the buildings, streets parking area, utilities
and other development features; and the proposed regulations to
` be applied to the district.
1 SZCTIGN III
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with Zia-
he final compretwosire site plan hereafter
Z-1727/HAMKICT AND MASER, INC. f FAGt 2
70M 'IT
approved and made a part hereof for all purposes anrl the regula-
tions, conditions, and provisions herein contained.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of Jsnuary, 1969, as an Appendix to the rode of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No 69-1, as amended, is
hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and
Use subject to the above conditions and specifications.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the genaral welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildiags, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or
fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof,
or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Ono Thousand
Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a
separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during
which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued,
and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be
punisned within the limits above.
SECTI N VI.
That Ordinaace No. 85-153 is hereby repealed.
SECTION VII.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the data of its passa e, and the City Secretary is hereby di-
rooted to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.'
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
CRUMUM =21 CITY WRITZKY
CITY OF DENTOK,0TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAXOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAB
By 66&
Z-1727/KAIMET AND NAMO INC./PACE 3
Yr
A.
rr w r rIy r rY w ww1 www. Irr..
w ~ rr, w.
r.~rww~i M+~.
+rar r ww r r rw r r y~
A Z 'www S : ',II,yY
• $ w....Yi 4 Ynn w wwili'iYIY~ Yw Yr . wY r
P yI~, a wA". I w. OYIIw r..ww r.rl.Y w 1 w
..o
w a
Yww w 1, rlYl1 M Y~,1 r rMq Yp y rt✓1
M.nn IMY , MIYF, w ,YI ri IN. n r W
~ _ 4 Mnr Yw.w Mrn M.MY. Y,Yw11 iM.Y.M1 Y
N I, -r.r r YrMy --I YII I Y~~
Y
Yw MM rlrr11Y1 w M11 1
MYYwY Yw
-n N wYr1 Y Yw,11 r rw. Add Yn
ItI M -.'rY ,w M rr...a Y Y1.1Y1 4. Ad Iw
b~ ~.a1~ -Iwln I.r1 Y VI. Y M M.,
~ V YIrY "Y wM1 r YwYI r IY.rI ,AA AAA
rw,.
Aovo
y ,wl~.,iy'1=11YIY WYyYI MH. Y1 yr
Ate. t.Y/'t*w r.r,r
Q
b
\~w
tT.~iin « rLt~. «r•qM ..»Ibl. '1r ~.Ilrlrq, mow oft
1
~i
I~Ltir~l~ttlli:Le.~. F~i{!i 1 !ik!
sr~}e ms r^ rrr „ s. a ,r`2T i'si .iK YS~ _~i'^.fx. 's i`- 1~~4 ~^,rv sgPv?-+*
t.
VMM11 01/21/46
CITT COUNCIL SUM rQWAT
TO: Mayor end. Members of the City Council
!RO[t: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUWICT: Z-1742
RSC;oWMWDAIXONI:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1712 at
its meeting of December 4, 1985.
SW2VM:
This is a request of a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to
planned development (PD) with the following land uses: single
family (S!-7) - 25,0 acres, zero lot line - 11.8 acres, and
multi-family - 13.5 sores.
BACKGROUND :
The 60.38 acre tract was annexed by the City of Denton at its
meeting of June 4, 1985. Due to a technical problem with
advertising the annexation and zoning are being reconsidered.
PRQ4 , DS___ P/&RTM M OR aROUPS &FPSCTKD:
No programs or departments are directly affected. Reply forms were
mailed to eight property owners within 200 feet of this property.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact to the general fund.
Res otfu,ly su tted:
c hl
Acting City Manager
Prepared by::
C, C. U Ca h'" "Y%_
Carson
Urban Planner
f,ppr ed
•
Jeff Meyer
Director of Planning and
Development
10544
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: z-1742 Meeting Date: January 21, 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Fields, Edwards, and Associates
1123 Fort Worth Drive
Denton, Texas 76205
Status of Applicant: Engineer
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) to the planned
development (PD) classification. The
following land uses are proposed:
1. Single family (SF-7) - 25.0
acres, 114 lots, density 4,6
units per acre.
2. Zero Lot - 11.8 acres, 70 lots,
density 5.8 units per acre.
3. Multi-family - 13.5 acres, 200
units, density 14,8 units per
acre,
Location and Size: 60.38 acres located east of Mayhill
Road and north and northeast of
Edwards Road.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Srirounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Vacant
South - Residential, Vacant
East - Residential, Vacant
West - Residential, Allan Estates
Mobile Home Park, Industrial,
Vacant
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Edwards Road is a collector street; 6
feet of right-of-way and perimeter
street paving is necessary. Sidewalk
will be required on Edwards Road.
m.., ~W.,.,a..,f.._.s.;„lyn.,s
(Ca" 4-1742)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Drd"nt.'s Two channels meet on the property and
detenti,en should be strongly
considered. The use of channels
versus detention will be weighed
especially with concern of an earth
or concrete drainage facility. Some
of the property shown may not be
developed since it is in a floodway/
floodplain. The feasibility of
development will require additional
studies.
Public Utilities: Electric service is available from
the City of Denton or Texas Power and
Light. An 8 inch water line must
be extended along Edwards Road.
Sanitary sewer lines are available.
HISTORY
The property was part of an annexation approved by the City
Council in June of 1985. Due to a technical problem with
advertising, the staff is resubmitting the annexation and zoning
petitions to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council
for consideration. The zoning was approved by the Planning and
Zoning Commission by a vote of 6-0 and by the City Council on
June 4, 1985. The final action on the annexation is scheduled
for January 21, 1986.
ANALYSIS
The tract is located in a low intensity area that is under the
intensity standard. This development would generate approxi-
mately 4,560 trips per day and the intensity standard would not
be exceeded.
Low intensity areas represent the primary housing areas for the
City of Denton. The proposed development includes a diversity
of housing types, single family and multi-family.
The concentration of multi-family in a low intensity area,
according to the Denton Development Guide, is limited to 200
units. This development includes 200 units with a density of
14.8 units per acre.
The proposal does not violate any Development Guide policies and
the proposed land uses make an adequate buffer between the Allan
Estates Mobile Home Park to the west and the agricultural land
to the east.
°F Mv 7C3'7177`r'y.'. $t
p7r
(Case 3-1742)
Page Three
RECOMMENDATION
Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1742 at
its December 4, 1985 meeting with the following conditions?,
by a vote of 6-0t
1. A comprehensive site plan must be approved by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council.
2. The multi-family (MF-1) and single family (SF-7) area shall
be consistent with the development standards (setbacks, lot
size, lot coverage) in the City of Denton Zoning ordinance
and with Article 7, Section B, Primary Residential Uses, of
the Zoning ordinance.
3. The zero lot lines will have a minimum of 51000 square foot
lots (50 x 100) and shall be consistent with the development
standards for single family (SF-7) unless othertrise shown on
the comprehensive site plan.
4. A landscaping plan for the multi-family area must be
approved prior to building permits being issued.
5. No front yard parking will be allowed.
6. A 24 foot section of Edwards Road will be constructed on
south and west sides of the development.
7. A tree preservation plan showing existing trees and trees to
be removed must be approved prior to building permits being
issued.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with conditions
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
3, Deny the petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Map
2. Concept Plan
3. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of June 12, 1985
4. #t lriifgr~rr t ~ c )gip~j i,(jat mi)ra~~, askoembo /A 1983
5 00
6. ya k ?:*A d Zoning Commission minutes of December 40 1985
0912]
.
q
1. / .
1
1 ~
r.
"SWIM
w
-Ong=
j r• ~ i
Le 4=00*.
Z-I
it
.
EDwaRDS RD,
i
4F 00
r<rr
ri i1NINL
1
` i
!
r \ 1
n-i Al r MA011{,♦ Itn M! , rqf !
n4/ 710
ff •~1 r M ♦1
~ IM
/ rl !1 M`
n 1
lot
~ rr r:y K
♦ ~ 1 ! r ~ f t
I I 1
IF l
O 1 r rr
1Np♦fW COAp. 1 1 0 4
1 1 tnolr. i I' I
11 l ~ C i~ ! • v
~ ~ r g ne 11
I
1 ~
f
7nlIIIIn CnrlcrrT rLAN
CAL)-FD 60.383 ACRl:3
I" " 200' r,InFON WALKER SURVEY A`f330
OFNtON COUNTY, TEXAS
CO. tTMLN1'~N.V.
•#e~p 1 Z minutes
June 12, loss
Page 4
DECISION: Mr. LaForte moved to recommend approval of
t=T7iti-Tubject to the following conditions:
1. Development standards for the duplex area shall he
consistent with standards listed for the 1-F district
in the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. These stan-
dards shall include lot size, lot width, lot depth,
lot covers setbacks, parking requirements, and
permitted `e, land uses.
2. Development standards for the tri-plax area shall
conform to City of Denton Zoning ordinance standards
for the SF-7 district, except that minimum lot size
shall be 90000 square feet,
3. Development standards for the gardenhome area shall
be consistent with City of Denton Zoning Ordinance
standards for the SF-7 district, except that one
building wall may sit on a side lot line,
4. Development standards for the townhome area shalt be
consistent with SF-7 district standards, except that
structures shall be attached and minimum lot size
shall be 2,700 square feet,
S. Developpment standards for the multi-family section
shall be consistent with standards for the MF-1
district.
6, Development standards for the general retail section
shall be consistent with Zoning Ordinance standards
for the general retail district,
7• No datec ad signs shall be permitted in the
development.
8. Landscaping plans must be incuded with specific site
plans for the general retail and multi-family areas.
Seconded by Mr, Pearson.
Chairman commented that he has reservations about the
general retail area and thinks it should be about two
acres. He also expressed concern about multi-family
concentration. He said, however, that petitioner has
made an honest effort to protect residents of Forrestridge.
Mr. Juren said he objects to retail and multi-family
concentration.
Mr. Sidor commented that he questions the need for so many
apartments in area, also the need for additional retail.
He suggested that petitioner revise his plan to include
more single family and zero lot line and reduce the number
of apartments.
Vote was called on motion:
Aye - Cole, LaPorte, Pearson
Nay - Claiborne, Eseue, Juren, Sidor
Motion failed 3-4.
Mr. Juren moved to recommend denial of Z-1740.
Seconded by Mr. Sidor.
Vote was called: Aye - Claiborne, Escue, .Iuren, Sidor
Nay - Cole, LaForte Pearson
Motion carried 4.3.
C.f'ZZ-1742, Petition of Tommy Corporation N.V., represented
by Fields, Edwards 6 Associates, Inc., requesting a change
in zoning from the a ricultural (A) classification to the
planned development ~PD) classification on 60,38 acres.
The property is located north and east of Edwards Road and
shown in the Gideon Walker Survey Abstract No. 1330, The
following land usbs are proposed for the planned develop-
ment:
~ ;a-+a,~rR +.m.e'cn?.~ y 'acs *s,~.w ~r :~.,-..-xsv~sr,¥T":,~n•rr; a..rn - x=. , s:.w ~.e. „g,:~
~7d
1► i S Mlnutrs
June 12, 19SS
Page S
Sint14 Family, SP-7) - on 1S,0 acres
wit A a densty of 4.5 units per acre
total of 113 units
Zero Lot Line - on 13.0 acres
with a density of 6.1 units per acre
total of 70 units
Multi-Pamily - on 13.7 acres
with a density of 1S units per acre
total of 205 units
Eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; one reply form was received in favor, none were
received in opposition.
PETITIONER: Greg Edwards, representing the Tommy Corpo-
ration, s ated they are proposing a mixed residential
development, with multi-fsmily uses adjoining Allan
Estates Mobile Home Pork and the Andrew Corporation,
and single family uses on the east side of the creek.
They are tryin to leave the flood plain area intact
to act as a buffer separating the higher intensity uses
from the lower intensity uses,
IN FAVOR: None present,
OPPOSED: Mr, Simmons of the Andrew Corporation stated
they are concerned about having adequate water for fire
protection considering this particular development and
Allan Estates Mobile Home Park which could bring in an
additional 600 units. They have seen no plan to provide
water and their insurance carrier has told them there is
barely enough water for their own use. They are also
concerned about having only a two lane road. He said he
assumes the city is planning to provide better roads and
adequate water.
Mr. Ham explained that the mobile home park is building a
12" line to tie onto line which serves Andrew Cor oration
which is a 11" line going down and across I-3S, said
that a 11" line will be provided next year with CIP funds
which will eliminate any inadequate water supply exper
lenced by Andrew Corporation. He further stated that at
no time is Andrew Corporation considered to have inadequate
pressure for fire protection. On question, he said Andrew
could experience some decrease in water pressure in peak
morning and evening hours, however, most of Andrew's work
force is during the day. On further question, he stated
that by the time development occurs the bottleneck will
be solved.
Mr. Ellison advised that at time of platting, city will
require adequate water supply.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated property is located in
s o"7"w fnf~R31ty area, that subdivision regulations will
apply to this property and any problems will be addressed
during platting stage, She said that multi-family con-
centration policy is n^t Uuing violated by this pproposal,
Staff recommends a,rprovai with chnditions as no Develop-
ment Guide policies are being violated.
Mr, Pearson questioned condition about no front yard park-
ing and Ms. Carson explained that parking in required front
yard setback causes traffic problems and staff tries to
eliminate that problem in a PD.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Edwards stated that Andrew Corporation's
concern about A& ter supply is being addressed by CIP and
will be reviewed during the subdivision process. tie said
June 12, 1!!s
Pass 6
the road issue will also have to be addressed by developer,
' that traffic capacity is going to have to be provided by
developer.
DECISION: Mr. LaPorte moved to recommend approval of
Z-1742 ;ub)ect to the following conditions:
1. The multi-Eamily (MF-1) and single family (SF-7) area
shall be consistent with the development standards
(setbacks, lot size, lot covers e) in the City of
Denton Zoning Ordinance and wit Article 7, Section B,
Primary Residential Uses, of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. The multi-family area shall be landscaped.
3. No parking will be allowed in the front yard setback.
d. The zero lot lines will have a minimum of 5,000 square
foot lots (SO x 100) and shall be consistent with the
development standards for sin is family (SF-7) unless
otherwise shown on the compregenslve site plan.
5. A 11 foot section of Edwards Road will be constructed
on south and west sides of the development.
t✓S*eonded by Mr, Sidor and unanimously carried (7-0).
D, Z-1750. Petition of L. A. Nelson, representing James F.
Mason and Robert W. Jones, requasti ng a change in zoning
from the agricultural (A) classification to the light
industrial (LI) classification on 95.265 Ages. The
property is located west of 1.55W pproximately 3,500
feet south of Airport Road (PM 1SISI and shown in the
0. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract No, 56, and the T. W.
Daugherty Survey, Abstract No. 356, if the toning change
is approved, the property may be utilized for any land use
permitted in the light industrial (LI) classification by
the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
Six notices Aare nailed to property owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or in
opposition.
PETITIONER: Mr. Nelson representing the owners of the
grope Fty7stated that light industrial uses exist in the
general area, that property adjacent and south is occupied
by Hoore Business Forms Systems. He continued they believe
the application to be consistent with the existin zoning
in that particular area. He said in area annexation pro-
ceedings, it was their thinking that more property should
be annexed and at that time their 90 acre tract was brought
into the city. He said the northern portion of the tract
is under contract for immediate purchase by a Fortune 500
company contingent upon zoning. He added that whatever
utilities are needed will be provided,
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that property is located
in a"fi gig Intensity area, that site is included in the
Economic Development Fact Book as a recommended site for
industrial uses. She clarified availability of utilities
by saying that a waterline extends to the northern boundary
of this property which would have to be continued southward
along the property frontage and tract is served by sewer
facilttIas. Request is compatible with Development Guide
policies and staff recommends approval.
REBUTTAL: None offered.
Public hearing closed.
~3 F `°1.9~„ ~::'ts :f§-.k2s l• . a 5i . :Yr;•.. 't : 'T~' :
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY F10 MS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1742
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Richard A. Baria None Received
Route 7, Box 88
Denton, TX
1
r
>D/
13
Ada
V
rr
C
l
i
MIX i A
e
AU 7
sT
P 8 Z Minutes
December 4. 1985
page 3
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances Outside
a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer ramp or Mobile Hoare Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
2. A comprehensive site plan must be approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council be-
fore plats will be approved.
3. A six (6) foot solid wood fence shall be erected be-
tween the petitioner's property and the Mason Haggard
property. The fence shall be erected before any con-
stru.:tion of development occurs.
Seconded by Mr. Appleton, and unanimously carried (6-0).
C. Z-1742. Petition of Tommy Corporation N.V., represented
6y Fields, Edwards fi Associates, Inc., requesting a change
in zoning from the a ricultural (A) classification to the
planned development ~PD) classification on 60.38 acres.
The property is located north and east of Edwards Road and
shown in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330. The
following land uses are proposed for the planned develop-
ment
Single Family iSF-7) - 25,0 acres
density 4.5 units per acre, total units 113
Zero Lot Line - 13.0 acres
density 6.1 units per acre, total units 79
Multi-Family - 13.7 acres
density 15 units per acre, total units 20S
Eight notices were nailed to prop ray owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposition.
PETITIONER: None present.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this property
wa partoof-an annexation approved by the City Council
in 1985. fie said that due to a technical problem with
advertising, staff is resubmitting the annexation and
zoningg petitions to the Plannin and Zonin Commission
and City Council for tonsideratfon. He sa d that zoning
was ap- proved by the Planning and Zoning Commission byy a
vote of 6.0 and by the City Council on June 4, 1995. He
stated that final action of the annexation is scheduled
for January 21, 1986. He added that staff recommends
approval.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Ms. Cole moved to recommend approva). of Z-1742
3uo jocc to the following conditions:
1. A comprehensive site plan must be approved by the
Planning and Zoning Com62:sston and City Council.
5r _
.A'
i.J
r_,~zy-x= t n r : wn r" ;e2`R 3: -e >-r
P A Z Minutes
December 4, 19;A5
Page 4
R.
2, "The multi-family (Mr-1) and tingle family (SF-7)
area shall be consistent with the development stan-
dards (setbacks, lot site, lot coverage) in the city
of Denton Zoning Ordinance and with Article 7, Sec-
tion s, Primary Residential Uses, of the Zoning
Ordinance.
3. The zero lot lines will have a minimum of 5,000
square foot lots (SO X 100) and shall be consistent
with the development standards for single family
(SF-7) unless otherwise shown on the comprehensive
site plan.
4. A landscaping plan for the multi-(;oily area must be
approved
roved prior to buildln ppermits being issued.
S, a yard parking wilf be allowed.
6. A 24 foot section of Edwards Road will be construc-
ted on south and west sides of the development.
7. A tree preservation plan showing existing trees and
trees to be removed must be approved prior to build-
ing permits being issued.
Secor-ded by Mr. Pearson, and unanimously carried (6.0).
D. Z-1779. Petition of Miller of Texas, Inc. requesting
plaNilSd development toning on 690,84 acres presently
toned agricultural (A). The property is described as
beginning approximately 600 feet south of U.S. Highway
310 and extending to approximately 10100 feet south of
FM 426 (Post McXinney Street). The property is further
described as being a tract in the M. Forrest Survey,
Abstract 417, and the M. Durham Survey, Abstract S30.
If the planned development is approved, the following
land uses will be permitted:
a) Cluster housing - 282 dwelling units on iS.70 acres
with a density of 18 units per acre - attached
b) Multi-faintly - S37 units on 22.37 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
c Office - 8.78 acres
d General Retail - 17.94 acres
e) Multi-family - 385 units on 16,05 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
f) Cluster housing - 137 units on 11.47 acres
with a density of 12 units per arse - attached
S) Community Facilities - 13,39 acres
h) Single Family (10) - 137 units on 10,000 square foot
lots on 39,30 acres
with a density of 3.5 units per acre
i) Single Family (10) - 249 units on 10,000 square foot
lots on 71,01 acres
with a density of 3.5 units per acre
Cluster housing - 452 units on 37,30 acres - detached
with a density of 12 units per acre
k) Office - 7.70 acres
1) Park - 8.40 acres
m) General Retail - 21.52 acres
n) Multi-family - S 393 units on 107.85 acres
with a density of 50 units per acre
o) Cluster houttng, - 115 units on 14.41 acres
with a density of 8 units per acre - attached
p) Community Facilities - 9.21 ccres
q) Single family - 331 units on 1000 square foot lots
on 92,1S acres
with a density of 4 units per acre
r) aelghborhood Service - 4.40 acres
S) Sin I* Family - 285 units an 7000 square foot lots
on 11,62 acres
with a density of 4 units per acre
t) Cluster Housing - 184 units on 22.99 acres
with a density of 1 units per acre - attached
rX
ATTIr z, .1
r NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMMING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDI-
NANO OF THE CITY OF DENTON TE:.AS AV ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS
AitZMMo AND AS SAID MAP APPLW TO 60.36 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
NORTM AND EAST OF EDWARDS ROAD, AND IS MORE PARTICUL"RLY
DESCRIEED NXREIN, TO PROVIDE FOR A CXMX IN ZONING CLAfSIFICA-
TION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLA"IFICATION AND U8E
DESIGNATION TO PLANNID DgnW M W "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
AND USE DESIGNATIONr PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PRX"TY OF $1 000.00
FOR VIOLATIONS THERkOF' PROVIDING FOR A SIVERASILITY Cat-, AND
PROVIDING FOR AN IFFEC4IVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREIN ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the zoning classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Gideon
Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, Denton County, Texas, being part
of a (called) 61.67 acre tract described in • dead from O.R.
Sullivan to H.B. Rhine on January 5 1900 recorded in Vol=@
2970 Page $84 Deed Records of said ~ounty anc! Being more fully
described as follows:
SEGINMING at a steel pin at the Southeast corner of said 41.67
acre tract in Edward a Road, this corner being rrr:;mimately
North 10,450 feet and East 50450 feet frog the Southwest corner
of said Walker Survey;
THMCE N. 86°08' W. with the South line of said tract in
Edward's Koad a distance of 1331.3 feet to a steel pin at a turn
in said road;
THENCE N. 10°22' W. in Edward's Road a distance of 505.5 feet to
a steel pin on the best bounder y line of said 61.67 acre tract
and on the West line of said road;
THENCE N. 3°27' E. with the West line of said tract and of said
Edward's Road elong and near a fence a distance of 1351.8 feet
to a steel pin at the Northwest corner of safe 61,67 acre tract;
THENCE S. 86°53' E. along and near a fence a distance of 1412.5
feet to a steel pin and fence corner at the Northeast corner of
said 61.67 acre tract;
THENCE S. 2°14' W. along and near a fence a distance of 1867.0
feet to the place of beginning and containing in all 60.383
acres of land;
is hereby changed frost Agricultural "A" District Classification
and Use designation to Planned Development "PD" District
Classification sad Use designation under the comprehensive
zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
That the district shall be developed in accordance with the
following conditions:
A. That the are" designated for single family ($F-7) use on
the attached site plan shall be developed and used in
accordance with the zoning regulations appliesble to 3F-7
zoning districts.
ply,
p S,p. t'4 Ihi (M'r." {Y fi= Ri , I.°;v.. { Y. ..S ~r .iW .,ifi Fv3 !v fir. .r f.. 1A SYF :ly
g. That the area designated for "to lot Itne use on the
attached site plan shall be 4aaeloped and used in
accordance with the sowing rolulatiaas applicable to SF-7
zoning districts, axe*
pC that the lots may have a minimum
area of 3,000 square lost, a minimum width of 50 fat, e
minimw depth of 100 fost, and there shall be a zero side
yard setback for one side of each lot, provided that such
zeta side lard setback does not abut another sero lot
lice setback on as adjacent lot.
C. That prior to any development or coastruetion within the
areas designated on the attached site plan as multifamily
(NF-I), a comprehensive site plan for that Area shall be
submitted for approval in occordancs with the procedural
required for planned development districts. The
comprehensive site plans submitted for that area shall
neat the following requirameatr and conditions:
1. A landscaping and tree preservation plan shall be
submitted.
2. The comprehensive site plan shall not contain any uses
inconsistent with the uses permitted in MY-1 zoniag
districts.
3. The comprehensive site plan shall show a 25-foot front
yard and 10-foot side yard building setback and ahrll
not contain any parking lots, areas or spaces therein.
D. That the epprov..l of the district showing a designated
multifamil (W-1't area on the attached site plan, shall
not, and s not intended to, be doomed as approval of
such area for any particular land use, but shall be
construed to scan that multifamily (KF-1) use will be
considered as a possible appropriate use of the area so
designated at the time the comprehensive site plan for
such area is submitted, the approval thereof to be
determined upon consideration of such relevant factors,
whiL:h may include but not be limited to; tha time
elapsed from the s hoo Live date of this ordinance to the
data t"te comprehensive site plan for such area is
submitted; the number of proposed dwelling units; the
arrangement, design of the buildings, streets, parking
areas, utilities and othar development features; and the
proposed regulations to he applied to such area.
E. That the portion of Edwards Road on the south and west
aiues of the district will be coastru,red to a width of
24 feet prior to occupancy of the district.
SECTION III.
That the development of the property shall be in substontiel
compliance with the final comprehensive site plans attached
hereto or any comprehensiva site plan hereafter approved for say
part of the district as required herein and made a part hereof
for all purposes and the regulations, conditions and provisions
contained herein.
The Zoning Mal of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 169, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordf~aoco No. 69-1, as amended,
be, am the saw is hereby amended to show such ehanle in
District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions
and spscificstions.
99cT p IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Terms, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
d
2-1742/TOWY CORtORATi011/ftal 2
plan for the purpose of Ad thM ieneral welfare of the
City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
other things for the character of tm district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular u is, &ad with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and ancourailing the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, sod its citizens.
ECTIO!! V.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance,
or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements
thereof, or of : permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor ppunishable by a fine not exceeding
One Thousand Dollars ($1f00 .00). Each such person shall be
doomed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or
portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is
committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such
violations such person ,hall be punished within the lisits above.
SECTION VI.
That if any section, subsection, pareraph, sentence, clause,
phrase or wordy in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance and the City Council of
the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted
such remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION VI..
That Ordinance No. 85-154 is hereby repealed.
SECTION VIII.
That this ordinaaoe shall become effective fourteen (14)
days from the data of its passage, and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of
the date of its pasaage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
RICHARD 0.
KAYOF
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CKUWM ALUM CITY BEMMTM
CITY Of DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORN:
DBDRA ADAM DRAYOVITCII, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTO[1, TLW
BY.
z-1742/TOMW couORATION/lAGi 3
r
5"'_'.:;:~-~.; `~rs"a ~'1` :~;:.sh s,' r 'r.„,.ex °c...- ~~.•-vx. {e a
raM~rta ~'.t1M►MiM1~ ~ ~ ~
C*~JiMb tr f1M/INrf,i rf
A/r'NwIMA'tKV MIN• ~ ~ ' ~~~'1
14
F
.M /J I
AI I AI r MAt11LF IIrrMP.Alt
Ilal !f0 /
a ue ;n„I 1 ~ ~ 1 , ~rl ~ a ~r
se
r . ~ I a ~r
l ♦r M'
.r
1 0 wool
1 ~
V '
{ 1(K x
45
~ 1 1 a~
r '
~ I 1 r
, 'tJ
t
I
tron~~w cogs. ~
L r en~rr I11 ~t' a „
1 ~ ~ [r
POOMM
11,
'
/re I I I~Ib ~ ~ r r l ♦ lr
f
1
x
• 71U1 111g CntilrFri f 1_AN
CALLED 50.383 ACRES
2001 r,Inr.ON WALKER SURVEY A•1330
DFNTOM COUNTY, FEXA!%
own
'.C INY~lTNWT CO. N~V. _
rc
~ . n
S€" s r, SSl''. 1°h` rvs' r.,y r •msa .FZ t P t
DATE: January 21, 1904
CITY CM IL REPORT
!r ~
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9670 FIRE DEPARTMENT UNIFORMS
Mm TI : We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, J.B. Battle
Uniform Co., for the total bid amount of $12t573.66.
St ow:: This bid is for the annual purchase of Fire Department
uniforms. We received four bids and the bid of J.B. Battle
was the lowest bid. We have purchased from this company before
with satisfactory results.
BAfr Tabulation Sheet
PROSRAMS, DEP'ARTTS OR 6ROM AFF'ECl'E[t:
Fire Department
FISCAL IMPACTS Budget Funds #100-006-0051-8108
Res 1iy su fitted:
• 9
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
Prepared by:
. Marsha 1, C.P.M.
a: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
r . !R J. Mrs"] ,C C. P N.
f 1tU: Fmhesing Agewat
r
1fID ! 9570
DID TITLES FiRF DFPARTmEw UNiFngms
LADD J. B. ti0N0Y.AN FACTORY GARLAND
OPENED January 7_._ 98f 2UNIFORMS BATTLE UNIFORM SALES UNIFORMS
CO. UNIFORM CO. UNIFORM
ACCOUNT N 100_OOfi-0051-9IQ$ CO. CO.
VENDOR
Pply Nn Rid 25.95 3 3. - r,
31.99 30. an
2 Pants 3 Shirts -
--mas 13.00 11a20 i 10.95
4 106 Shirts -Long Sleeve 12.45
5 20 Officers Shirts SS 10.45 14.00 11, 2C 10.95
6 27 Jacket --Heavy Duty
AL09- 79.95 -68.75 -1-M.00
7 15 Firemen's Uniform Ca
19.85 .10, Qu
8 3 Officers Uoiform Ca s .5
Deliver
Tot 1 12,573.68
t
~ y e' 9FS~e ° zs°r~ va;. ^^•,s:° js ",',~a}'*"..3 . M<s$:7' ..fin . w... ye^p p;R zr, r ~c r
'z
NO.
AN OR00ANCL ACCZFTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CowRACT .
FOR TRZ PuicusZ of MATERIALS, bQUIP'HM SUPPLIZS OR SRVICta; .
PAWIDXW FOR TU EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS Tk6BUi; AND P&OYIDING
FOR AN FF/KMYZ DATC.
WHZRFAS, the City has solioited, reauived and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary saterials, equip-
sent, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
WM MUS, - the City Manager or a dosiinated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the asterials,, equipment, supplies
or services as shown in the f P Bid Proposals submitted therefor;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City budget
for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of
the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and
accepted herein; and
WBZRJUS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$10,000; and
WHX ZASp Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THZREF0RZ9 THE COUNCIL OP TRZ CITY OF DUTON HOMY ORDAINS:
SXCT121 I.
That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
proposalst' attachedthersta, are hereby services,
and approved "Did
being the lowest responsible bids for such itsmr:
BID ITEM
NUMBER 140. VENDOR AMOUNT
9570 All J. 0. Battle Uniform Co. $12,573.65
SiCTY~~:
That bi!! the acceptance and pproval of the above numbered
items of go submitted bids, theaCity accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terss, specifications, standards quantities
and for the • cified suss contained in the lid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents,
SECTION III.
That should the City and persons submitting approved and
accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter iota a
*'.r Rv^.. ,?+?''a7-t yi"x ~wa's. P^aay~t^F'~l '.`~"~y"E^'rmTt svg'~'t f~~'a-~ ..'sr
f
formal written agreeeent as a result of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the city Manger or his
designated representative is hereby authorised to *=cuts the
written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
the written contract is in eacordsaes with the tame ,
conditions, specifications standards, qusmtities and specified
suns contained in the DU Proposal and related bid documents
heroin approved and accepted.
SECT20If Iv.
That b the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of I submitted bids the City Council hereby authorises
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount cad in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract ud4 pursuant thereto am authorised heroin.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 21 day of „wary 1986
CITY Of DEtR'OM, TEXAS W. ATTEST:
cM=TTz ALLEN, MY SEMMY
CITY OF DEfMHO TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHO CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Ol DLIfM, TEXAS
BY*
~ Tllp
Y
DATE: January 21, 1986
CITY COI WIL
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla► Acting City Manager
SU9JECT: PURCHASE ORDER #71212 JOAN CONAGEN
.n We recommend this purr,hase order be approved in the amount
of $66,223.00.
SUINW: This purchase order is for the 12 month rent of 326 E. McKinney
(Personnel and Data Processing Offices) at $5,435.23 per
month as per the Contract Agreemnt. This is a $440.23
increase for this year over last.
gAC»ig181p; Purchase Order 11212
P itAMS, OEP`AR71iFMT5 OR SW AFFECTED:
Personnel, Data Processing W General Government
FtM 1NiACT: 1985/86 Budget Funds Account Number 100-003-0002-8518
General Fund Rent of Buildings
Re ect lly su fitted:
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
Prepared by:
LM FIVE,
ale Tomb. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
T e: 'urchasing AWt
3Y4~'i~~j u;; t' .-,c 4 r•,a•~ • r-•~,. _ ~e-sxrs'fi~S+ ' ' .~,'3'~'l~F,,`an
04 TEXAS MEET I? HAf100101 ! DENTON, TX 76XI
P. 0. NUMBER DATE/ VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TV
71732 01/09*4 304
CON49000
VENDOR SMP TO:
JUAN CONAGEN CITY ON DENTON♦
318 tda OAK PARKS i RECIitAT ION
DENTON• Tx 76201 321 Ea NCKINNEV .STREET
OENTONe TX 76201
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION 810 NO. LINE AMOL*
01 100 003 0002 aai a 12 *014THS UNT FOR 3269a MCK WHEY 650a2304
The City of Derrbrr, Taxes Is tax exempt • Hausa BIII No. 20. TGTAI. NOR P.G.
Reference P. 0. Nuatber an all B/L, Ship raers<s and Invoices,
Shipments are F. 0. B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. By
Sand Invoices T0: Direct Inquiries T0:
C,1ty of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C, P. M. Purchasing Agent
215 E. kKkwrey St., Denton, TX 76201 Toga 0. Shaw, C. P, M. Asst Purchasing Agent
(or as Indicated on Purchase Order) $11/366-IJ11 D/Fw Metro 267.0042
The City of Denton is an equal oppodwity egrtoyer
BATE: January 21, 1986
CITY COMIL 811MT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 971270 ALAMO TRANSFORf1ER
RIE ! W-TION: We recommend this pur-: ase order be -approved in the amount
of $15,500.00 to Alamo Transformer for 21 reconditioned
transformers.
SlrPAWY: This purchase order is for the emergency
Distribution transformers to meet deadlinesrforsinstallations
of new services. Some of these units will serve as backup
to units in service until the new units on order are delivered.
New units have 120 delivery, reconditioned have 21 to 35 day
delivery.
Purchase Order #71270
Y' ! DEPARTIlFJM OR i~0UM5 AFI:ECTF.D:
Electric Distribution
1985/86 Budgirt Funds Account 0611-008-0252-9222
Re ctf ly su it
y
Rick Svehla '
Acting City Manager
pared by:
Aan., om V Shaw. C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent I
Approved:
-All
rsMt ! C.P. q.
t1a; si~rg Agent t;x
40
c: _
IL4
RF2
40M! TEXAS CO)
1ONX 76201
P. O' NUMBER DATE /VE ~ DOCUMENT ~
1l era TYF
it 71
VENDOR
-
ALA 14U TNAN:1N+114MER c ,n SHIP TQt .r t rr. r'
A9J1 Jsl'Is~;p' (,GNtlai fJN rt „i"GVNN~NI;A ION{A1i1i1111,~1+t11~'_., •
t T ON4Y.>~, Sri's
SAN 1!N1UNi1J♦ 1'X 73218 'Do NN,,pDWiL.IGAtR;r
A f TN J nl{ ~.fiAreLfzu , r ',r '~tlr I '
4 4
I ~ 1 ~ llI + 12 Ir r•I 1 r t; ~ I f~~ 7 I ( :j~"'ty~ ~LLTy0~ ir•R I L
' - !I~' I, i, •~~.~,~,Ii ,-I tlS Sri, ~~r i~..~yl I,
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION 'BID NO t.INE AMOUN'
'bl fill' OdlJ 04'52 g299 1' 509VA PAONUUNF1 762'deasedY Q ~I.'9'o~><t~t .~i
ug oil 00ti joau `sIaJJg J,' B 7.>SKVA PAVI*QVNt 'l (Itl.4
0000
i Aa t ,r 6 Ihtl y
Y f r jj j fi
' II I J P !t'. r. IV'. : d 1 tl rl'' ~T,Y Yr'1^'
n
y 1 r ' I i, I w' r o I♦ y.. r
f
1 { )
'Ip r r I ' 1 1 11 + it~ I f~ ' r' • y"i 1' f~ 4•r `JL 1.', r
L~•1s 1 II . I, r 11 ~ 9r ~V' 'I + 3,i1 k ~ ~ ~~YLFjM '71 i
1! II R 1.11 I 1•;l 1 ~r 'r ti If r I..AI r r, . 'I,i }1+j 1r~ ,r,.'h' r It li
r r 1 4'/.' y 1! , F 1' i 1 y• rr t F j~y~ a.'T V „ 1 1 4 {E,'
f~ !+~I, r I r.r• Y`L i+, I., Y .:'I. . n' ~I'~r,~ l ty,}I11~f p}~~` I'. ~S. rILMr'I ~~~~',lf}~ r ' ~Y~ r 1 ~~+(~I.I `y
1,0
r , It , r r I l~,r) fi 'i ' + .R.,t ry ! r a,
I ' rl .I + r I yy i
1 ~ L fi. ~f• ~1 / 5~,. ,,~r ~~I+I 1 VI r.l rf ll. III t. 111' ~~.~~1 L~r, 1~1 ,.f
,'Ir {1'
r 1~ ~.r f~ ~ I r r I « ~ ~i,~ t Yr tr L~~ ..L r. I''t "'~f f~{ a I''~ ~ 1 ~r
rI .~^ya ll,° 4n kli_ if ~.r't ~~.~~..II r 1 rl ' t r i~.,'~II R'~~t~r ~'I'z'»J ~Rtii<i'' }}rr'V I.uy'r~,riv~"y►j r,{I~III,,I .,,II
L i II. i, 1 q," 1 { r Tri .,•.:i ►SR~r.'I,A;'. T
w r f t{I 11t,a 7: I r1 ' r~'r ~ ' I I ii I I r ~.1y i"' ' , r t fa w W a{1 I•t .,~1~
t r I 1 , L. I „ I I r ! r' I S r rn , ! Ir: Y R b 1.
`,1 1 CIA 1, r I rt.: I: I i' r } f' '1 Or'fR t:, t, wf+ AI r I
r 10,
t.1 lr R
► I !15 Y..' 'r. ±I '1 I rl r.. r,1 Ii let yll. e F t~
,1 {I 115 I/ I. l r~' 1 tili~7~MC0. ylrr 0. Vw~ll'
t r I r l i A'. I r~
• h~.r d f r. 1 I I I r 11 I 1 : r l 'r. r
fie
40. Jm '1 ` 'ti rt r ,t°i,Z'> It f}Y♦'r +1~
14 d. ~I ~,•,,rl :p~ r i..rL 1 , 6 I Ir / RIr LI d I 11 ji. r+ r i t { 1 1
,I , h 1 t I , 1~ r't r-t A., ILA-;Q•, a~
h'1( t,Ir •r I ` is /d s rtt I.:. t^ Y~J~i+f'7 1 j 1.{~ r
0 1e~,iRa
YII iiM /,L 'r fl rY r 15, Ir i!t
M r 1 d r'
It'I}r. '•~:Ir I~ 1 r ~'t~$~ ~r~~J r't~'~~~i~~l..f i.Ittl {s~
Ij~t tl+i~~lty >>'f r-r~3~~
'7
W~~,~~
.,1 ty I r - t ,lr•r I R I1 r .W ' 1 ~ '
L .r' ~1 1 r . .I V I' I ar! fl 1'J 1.' r. _ y .n F7'
Y~iy~~ I ~ ' • y 1 ' j ~ t 11' ~ •14 It ? T ~-ar t.~,i JiiR~ Ii,f1r. 11
C~ CF ^ r :a I ' r R1 r' ~ ~ r~~ ~ 4 1 I , f f.' r • !'I ~'I - IiR .R, +/l i. l~~r
r d 111 1. ,,,,y ^ rl)h y 1 " rill + 7 1 "lr: G r1t [I~h.F°•_ r* a r,
Y ♦Il~j R 1 I,I I r 1' aCe~ 1 , 1 1
N'N-L~ i• .r r 'r I • 1 / I, ri ! kli•. ra i r ~t•"'
Vi , ri r ~ t' ~ 1 1 jF.x ~t I,1r, w , 1r1 1 njp~~S rt .t~M.f zt+ w ti•r
.ajar t ri ll iyl I. II'lr I I ~tia .:r+.. r r~ r;.. 1t/ ~l~r'~r .J' i •'Y .iV ~.~~.t~, Mr,:~..,
~l Trt
. '~~yar» ^ 3 I ~I +dd f Mall~yj, ~M 4;~~ A„~
•..I'I w~, t~ R11! 4 , ! , r r , irM 'I I ~r:f+/ •F7 4T': i
.1t ~1 'I
/ r ~p 1'f ICI r ~'y 14 r~'11 '•.r41 'f1 ,R, FI t~~},I~ 1 l''la~T f •I {j~ IV1i r'
t+ ,Ir,~lla'fi'~ t`: I~rt~,,~,, r 14 wt . 1; t1r A.. 'f a r
!4 4
R , + 7 ff kA I r fi r ,f I~.' t tl 't' - I .311 i.' r:'FI ( I 'I .'~I'Y~:
Irk fIr ~..~~N' 1'#'•r'A~Yti'I~+')ILe,' :I~_ '1 N'tlgl t'r'~.a ilayl ~,tf ~~tX✓;1
I t
Ir } I Mrl ' ' I } i M+1 } 1r'.' I.+ rJ i'I~ I/ Y yf. 'r 11
ry L•r~r~r.1,, ' I. Ir f.I 'I' I 1 l~ I 1~.'' nl.l IR{•All
111111 ~ 1 1 ~11 RRR , M~~ rl
he City of Denton, Texas is fast exempt 1 HOUSe Bill No. 20, ra N.n,' ! 3 !{C r r
o i l
9R~.1 !~~f1ti'},.
hrence P1O.11►epber on all B Shlpe~ents end Irntolces I {;i1 r } ) F
Ip~efJb ele.RI0,'B I Gity G( WPI)M, tW 1ai,IndlCetedl
! -t r I ~;I ~~1 I~r
I
Itt.Nwww 1' ' Items Received Date Fvotoomr Number`-{ ~Aatot~n
+L''tr.'/ I' t.• r 1 1 } ~ I ~~Wyn t''1' ~ Ir' tl' N''I"11! 1e3'. ~ / t+~'I'
.1
r. ,
I
1, Al
f ..~TTr^?F't Lt s,~• s. .1 r n w r.. -.F ...aiw.i nL 9. 9h r}I ~aSr.'. 'r.k ~~r• a
All
DATE: January 21, 1986
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCH*SE ORDER #71918 MOTOROLA
tEC01 TION: We recommend this purchase order be approved as recomended
by the Utility Department in the amount of $60,668.00.
Y: This purchase order is for a centralized electronic control
system designed to monitor the waste water lift stations.
BACWROU110: Purchase Order 071918
Memo from the Utility Department
PMORRM9 DEPARTNOM OR 6RMM AFFECTED:
Waste Water Treatment
FISCAL IMAO: 1986/86 Budget Funds Account 0624-008-0470,9110
Res ctfu y su itt
Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
aced by
To0i D. Shag, C. P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
t
&Nn J. 116"hail, C.! m.
-ills: Pttt'Chtsl~ A,~eir
lot~# TwW STREET IDENmo TX 7"1
P. 0. NUMBER DATE /jENDQ NO.
71910 0 /14.0 507 DOCUMENT TYl
MoTaiaSaa
VENDOR SNIP TO..
MOTOROLA CON10MICATIONS CITY OF DENTON*
3320 BELT LINE M/K V49ATME IT PLANT
DALLA30 TX 70234 1100 MAVHI" ROAD
ATTN2 JAMES MANTOS DIENTOMs TX 76205
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN'
01 624 008 0470.9110 1 01593 COMPUTER. INTERFACE 60600004
02 624 008 0470.9110 1 TDN7167 MSC3 COMPUTHA CENTRAL 80300.04
03 624 004.0470:.9110 1 TDN6932 UPS POW98 SOURCE 10990*64
04 624 004 "70-0110 1 CL96469, RADIO INTERFACE CA" 12400'
05 624 004 04'10' 9110 i L23TS03100 N MAXAR BASE STA 10100001
00 624. 008 0470 9110 580 A613"U TRANSMISSION LINE 247041
07 624 OOS 0470 9110 40 TDN6677 *-KALE CONNEICTOAS 920001
OB 624 404 0470 9110 11 MX4034A A/C SURGE PROTECTORS 600091
09 624 008 0470.9110. 11 ST-707 LIGMNINuG A11514STORS 353354
10 624 004 0470. 9110 10 TDE6630 MAGI ANTENNA 742094
11 624 000 0470:.9110 10 P6253 MRU INTRAC UNIT ?24 000001
12 624 004 0470:9110 2 W978 ANALOG INPUT MODULE 10.050001
13 624. 008, 0470 9110 2 V116 4-CON"OL EXPANSION 520001
14 624 000 0470 .9110. 10 11226 NENA-4X HOUSING 101100404
15 624 000 0470 9110 10 FLN5760 PARAMETER SETTING ORD 950001
16 624 004 0470.9110 1 KK"588 TEST SET CABLE 27004
17 624 000 0470 9110 1 OPTIMIZATION COSTS 475.00 X 2 980044
in 624 00a 0470-9110 1 LICONBE APPLICATION ASSISTANCE 250006
The City of Denton, Texas Is in exempt • House Bill No. 20. .O. 50 564001
Reference P, 0. Number on all B / L, Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments us F. 0. B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. By
Send Invoices TOc Direct Inquiries TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C. P, M. Purchasing Agent
215 E. IkXbMey St., Donlon, TX 76201 Tom D. Slaw, C. P. M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
(or as Indicated on Purchase Order) 817/566x8311 D/FN Metro 267-0042
The City of Denton is an equal opportunity * plover
M •.f%:l,i
CffY01 DtN'PQAI, IWX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.82'00
Datem January 9, 1986
Tot R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities
Through David Ham, Assistant Director of Utilities
Water/Wastewater
Froms Asa Brown, Superintendent, Wastewater Treatment
Subja Emergency Purchase of Monitoring and Control Radio
Equipment for ten (10) Remote Sewage Lift Stations from
Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc.
The City of Denton has seventeen (17) remote sewage lift
stations. Presently, there is no way of monitoring these stations
as to their proper operations except by their physically being
checked on by a lift station operator. In the past we have had
problems at lift stations which have contributed to the lift
stations overflowing. The overflowing of the lift stations are
caused by pump malfunctions or obJect:s clogging pump impellers.
When this occurs, the lift station operator physically must go to
the lift station location, shut off the improperly operating pump,
and turn on a back up pump.
By purchasing a radio control and sonitorinq system, we would
be able to reduce ~Lhs time pumps were not pumping. In addition
the lift stations could be monitored from the wastewater treatment
plant which would allow more expeditious dispatching to the lift
stations where overflowing was occurring. Also, pumps could be
deactivated and backup pins activated. This would reduce the
time the remote iift,stations were overflowing.
This emergency purchase wet Id allow us to expedite the
correction of this environmental pollution source by alerting a
dispatcher that there was raw sewage overflowing, the location of
the lift station and also control to activate a backup pump. In
addition to the sewage overflow bwing a stream contamination
z
~ k5
,
source, it also is a public health and public nuisance problem.
There are lift stations which ara close, in proximity, to private
citizen's property. Because of this, the raw sewage overflows
cause odor problems and odor complaints. The emergency
installation of this monitoring and control system would help us
expeditiously reduce the following problemss
. Sourcfs of stream pollution
. Publ;kr health hazard
. Public nuisance
Odor problems
The City of Denton is encouraged to reduce these problems by
State, Federal and Local Public Health Officials as well as
pollution control agencies, such as the Environmental Protection
Agency and the Texas Water Commission. It would improve our
public relations to expeditiously purchase and install this
system.
Asa Brown, Supterintendr-nt, David am,
Wastewater Treatment Assistant Director
Division Water/Wastewater
Wit/ I
P
fr.~~.,:: s'~s^ r, . `X?~r 5 ~.^r rVrw ~ i_ . ;x t• r rv`r,~,".
ri
.mss r;.
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR TNZ ZXPENDITURZ or ►UNDS y0R
SMZRGEM PURCRRASZS OE MATZRLALS, EQRIIPm=T, supp rj OR
SZRVICZS IN ACCORDANCE WITH Tag PROVISIONS OP STATZ LAW
MVIDI CK PUAC l~ac~fROM RRZQIUUXM WS Of CONFXn %vS BIDS
AND WNZRZAS, state law and ordinance require that certain
contracts requiring an expenditure or pa~wat by the City in an
amount exceeding 100000 be by coar trove bids, except is the
case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at
once to appropriata money to relieve the necessity of the
citizen, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is
necessary to protect the public health of the aitisaas of the
city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property,
machinery or equipment; and
WHKJW , Station 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinanaas requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
=10,000; and
WRRERZAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the council providing for the expenditure o.f funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness small be by ordinance;
NOW ► T ► Tic COUNCIL Or TRRZ CITY Ol DZNM many ORDAIM:
SZC'f~ ION x.
That the City Council hereby determiaea that there is a
public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to
appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the aitixens, or
to preserve the property of the aity, or to protect the public
hs th of the %siti,sana of the city, or to rovida for unfotseen
r to public pmaah inrry or equpmeat by reason
t~reof, the following tsergrcy pa~rahasrs 'Of~ msteriais,
equipment, supplies or services, as described in the Purchase
orders" attached hereto, are hereby approveM
PURCHASE
ORD.~ ,AST
71212 Joan WAM 65.223,00
71270 A_rq JwsfoR';A r $15.600.00
71918 ~bW*n1a 160,38.00
i
SZC'xI011 II.
That because of such emergency, the City Manager or
designated employer is hereby authorised to pornhase the
materials, equipmmat, supplies or services as described in the
attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the
amounts therein stated, such tmirrgency purchases being in
sceordaoce with the provisions of state law exrmptin` such
purah"es by the City from the requirements of nampetitive Wa.
BZCT~II.
That because of such ewergency, the City Manager or
designated euployee is hereby autthhoorised to purchase the
"terial•, equipment, supplies or services as described in the
attached Purohasa orders and to slake paysent tbarsfors in the
*somata tberein stated, such anorgeacy purchases beia$ in
accordance with the provisions of state law ezaapting such
purohases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids.
St. -10 IIIo
That this ordinance shall beoome effective inoediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSZD AND AFF&OM this the 21 day of jeOVLro r 1986.
CITY Or DOMN, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY Of DXNTON, TLUS
APPSOVO A$ TO LSOAL FOM
908A ADAMI Dhh;AlOMU O CITY AT'rMW
CITY Of DRIP' MO TEXAS
MY:
TOI r and Members of ~
Maya the City Council
PROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECTt ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND 8ER"IC8 PLAN ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND
APPROXIMATELY 136.588 ACRES IN SIZE BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 500 F. OT
EAST OF THE CENTB'R LINE OF US HWY 377 AND SOUTH OF BRUSH CREEK ROAD
(M-11)
RECOMMENDAXION t
The Planning; and Zoning Commission recomtrends approval.
SUM Ys
This is one of six annexations being reprocessed due to an error in
publication procedures; final action is scheduled for January 21,
1986.
This is an involuntary petition for annexation initiated by the City
of Denton. :1 172 acre development including predominately single
family housing, townhouses, six acres of commercial, and approxi-
mately 3 acres of retail and multi-family is proposed. This tract
is approximately 2 miles south of the urbanized area of the City.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council directed staff to initiate the annexation process
at its meeting of July 3, 1984 The Council took final action on
June 4, 1985, but the process is being repeated because of an error
in the public notification process.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTKENTS OR QW'PS AFFECTED:
Two (2) reply forms were wiled to owners of property in the
affected area. None were returned.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
R pec ul a itteds zz~
Prepared by: Ri k Svehla
&6_n'1 Acting City Manger
F~1111.1k
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App ved•
M
Jeff Me t
Director o! P1ann ng
and Development
0782s
Z"! I
.,s'•.~.:. :tom.' 'T;s, w ire -3~ ~ht art vi' .>.r sy*:,.,u :gam
171
N0,
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LJT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 136.58 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTOM, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
PART OF THE GEORGE W. DAUGHERTY SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 351, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Reoeting the request
of the City f Council annexation
regular
of t he City of introduced
Denton,lTexas,
on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity ig afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the 'i/`y~' day of o ✓.v.,r7b4'r, 1985 in the
Council Chambers for all n erested persons o eta-to their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity a afforded, at a public hearingg held
for that purpose on the 3 _ day of c b y✓, `1985 is the
Council Chambers for all-tn'Firested persona o sae their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW,
THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEMON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the some is
made hereby a part of said Citq and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by
the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may
hereafter be enacted and the property situated :herein shall be
subject to and shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by
the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as
follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of lead lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the George
W. Daugherty Survey, Abstract No. 351, H. Haggood Survoy, Abstract
No. 5171 and the W. Hudson Survey, Abstract No. 586 and more
particularly d,jrcribed as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by
Ordinance No. 69-40, Tract III, said point lying 500 feet east of
and perpendicular to the centerline of U. S. Highway No. 377 and
in the north boundary line of the George W. Daugherty Survey,
Abstract No. 351 and the south boundary line of the James Severe
Survey, Abstract No. 1164, said point also lying in an oast and
west county road know,, as Brush Creek Road;
THENCE north 89°41'40" east along said survey lines and in said
county road, a distance of 1624.94 feet to a point for a corner;
THEXCE south 0°33'1,3" west a distance of 805 feet to a point for a
Corner;
A-11/ARK (377 SOUTB)/PAGE ONE
'A .1
Al.
r
THENCE north 89°15'26" went a divtanca of 163.8 feet to a point for
a corner;
THENCE south 0°51'55" east a distance of 394.5 feat to a point for
a corner;
THENCE south 2°59'17" west a distance of 919.7 foot to a point for
a corner;
THENCE north 89°38'13" west a distance of 1452.9 feet to a point for
a corner;
THENCE south 0°13'16" west a distance of 1032.26 feet to a point for
a corner;
THENCE south 79°08'04" west a distance of 1789.01 feet to a point
for a corner, said point lyingg in the present city limits line as
established by Ordinance No. 64-40 Tract III, said point also being
500 feet east of and perpendicular to the conterline of U.S, Hwy.
377;
THENCE north 27°28' east along said present city limits, 500 feet
east of and parallel to the centerlino of said highway, a distance
of 3907.86 feet tc the place of beginning and containing 136.58
acres of land, more or leas.
SECTION II.
The above described property is hereby classified as Agricul-
tural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map
of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended
accordingly.
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon ita passage.
Introduce, +efore !he City Council on the 12~ day of ,Dec., ,
1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1986.
RICMD 0. STEWART* WO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF ViNTON, TEXAS
BY:
A-ll/WOODCRM (377 sour)/PACB Tao
ti
g-, L
..mot.
> W,. t lf., ;4kS a " "+.r 1
v
low
SAS, Article 970a as amended requires that s plan of service
I%o adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
nexing an area, and
~'IDiREA&, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NQw, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS :
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic ^ontrol devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fj e
(1) Fire protection by the presea46 personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial uPe
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on he effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with articZ:e 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
e
T
~FA~ p +z -~1 •"t Y' i - •11 V rt... ~'r. 'J. R,;i 1-iLIF"y;C n .yi ' - i _k
r
8elviC! A2
Annexed Artaml
page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardou
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis an in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
i
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 8 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
.1
&AJ
~a
•E•A-ti
\
I~ s
if
IJ
1
i
. ~ 1
4
1
• f
f
.L
ANNEXAPlON:SCHEDULS
✓ Uctooer 28, 1985 Sunmic agenda item
v-' OctOber 29, 14d6 Suomit agenda OacK-up
r.--4 November y, 14d5 City Council seta date, time and place
cor public nearing
✓ Nuve,noer e, 19d5 Notice to Denton Record Cnronicie
November d, 1965 Puolisn notice and mailout
✓ November 11,19d5 Suomit agenda item
✓lovember 12,14d5 Sub,nit agenda baex-up
!i" November 19, 1945 City Council nolds first public nearing
4,--/Noveiwer 2U, 1965 Notice to Denton Record Cnronicie
i/Novemner 22, 1985 Fuolisn notice and mailout
November 25, 1985 Sunmit agenda item
1/Novetnber 26, 1985 Submit agenda bacK-up
c~ Decemaer 3, 1945 City Council nolad second public hearing
Decamoer 9, 14d5 Sunmit agenda itacn
,/December lU, 1985 Sunmit agenda UacK-up
✓A uecamber 17, 19d6 City Council institutes annexation
proceedings
L.eeemuer ld, 19d5 ordinance to Denton Record Cnronicie
✓ / Decomu er 10, 1985 Puolisn ordinance
w- January 13, 1986 Submit agenda item
c/ Jdnuary 14, 1986 Sunmit agenda nacK-up
* January 21, 1986 Final action oy City Council
* Denotes action by the City Council
0964g
P i 3 Minutes •
March 13, 1945
Page B
Mr. Bell stated he did not recently save onto this
channel, he has been therm for five years and stated he
did not have a water drainage Problem until developers
business since sia1951. to Atdevelop*
this p location, there a has beenn
a beauty shop and a Horse Shoe Inn. He stated he is not
a developer, but a contract plumber and his inten-
tions are not to go in and divide this tract up into
lots for sale.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to approve the petition of
Robert Bell, requesting a variance of Article 4.19 of
the City of Denton Subdivision and Land Developaen~,
Regulations, with respect to drainage requirements, on
a development consisting of a one acre tract located on
the west side of Duncan street between Smith and Dallas
Drive (V-12). Seconded by Mr, Juren.
Mr. Sidor commented that apparently the city has had
problems previously with other developers. He asked
if they have put up their money for drainage improve-
ments and we grant a variance, how will they foal,
Mr. LaPorte commented if those developers wanted a
variance, they should have come and asked for it. He
added, he doesn't know their particular case or even if
they would qualify for a variance.
Vote was called and motion passed unanimously (6-0).
d. Consider recommending approval of preliminary and final
replat of the John A. Hann's Addition, Block 2, Lot 4-R1.
Ms. Carson stated this is a tract of 0.749 acres east
of Austin Street and south of Hann Street. The site 13
toned multi-family and multi-family 3evelopment is anti-
cipatod. She added the problems with Building Inspec-
tions have been worked out and Development Review
Committee recommends approval.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Chair ieclared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of the
preliminary and final replat of the John A. Hann's
Addition, Block 2, Lot 4-R1. Seconded by Mr. 4scue
and unanimously carried (6-0).
V. Considerations
A. Recommend approval of the petition of the City of Denton
for annexation of approximately 136.58 acres beginning
approximately 500 feet east, of the centerline of V.S.
Highway 377 and south of Brush Creek Road (A-LL).
Mr. Ellison stated on July 3, L984, the planning and
Comaunity Development Department reported plans for a
proposed 172 acre development cor isting of predomcn-
ately single family housing, townhouses, six acres of
commercial, and approximately three acres of retail and
multi-family. No stated this property is a good example
of why we have developed the Subdivision and Land De-
velopment Regulations. ResiientiaL development does not
pay for itself especially in the area of water and
sewer. The site is currently located in the extra-
territorial jurisdiction of the City of Dontoo and the
P i 2 Minutes
March W. Im
Page 9
City Council directed staff to begin annexation pro-
cess. He continusd due to delays in obtaining 4 proper
legal description, changes in Staff responsibilities,
arid Of the annexation concerning
petittiion utilities
has tbeen s slower f then processing
usual.
He added electric service is available from both the
City of Denton and TP&L. Mater service must be planned
in conjunction with Argyle, because it too is in a dual
service area and extending City of Denton Bain is not a
feasible alternative. Sower servico is to be provided
by the City of Denton. The Development Review Committee
has reviewed a preliminary plat of the proposed develop-
ment, Woodcreek Subdivision and has withheld a recommend-
ation of approval pending comments and acceptance of the
Argyle Water Company for requested sale of water.
Mr. Li80rts made a motion to recommend approval Of the
petition of the City of Denton for annexation of approx-
imately 136,58 acres beginning approximately $00 feet
east of the centerline of U.S. Highway 377 and south
of Brush Creek Road (A-11). Seconded by Mr. Sidor and
unanimously carried (6-0).
9. Recommend approval of the petition of the City of Denton
for annexation of approximately 65.L2 acres beginning
350 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline
of U.S. Kighway 380 and east of Gees Ling Road (Capricorn
Mobile Home Park and surrounding properties) (A-13).
Mr. Allison stated the HoLigan Development Corporation
wishes to expand and improve the existing Capricorn
Mobile Home Park. The existing park is situated on
approximately 30 mares and an additional 63 plus acres
is proposed for mobile home land use st approximately
6 to 7 units per a;,re. Upgraded utility service to the
existing mobile hone park is a potential plus of the
proposal. He continued, a preliminary plat of the area
proposed for expansion has been submitted for review.
The City Council issued a directive to staff to initiate
the annexation process of the existing park and proposed
area of expansion 1t its meeting of December 18, 1984.
He added the P inning and Zoning Commission, the Public
Utilities Boar* and the City Council approved a request
for the extension of City utilities to the site. He
added, the city will have to provide water, sewer, and
police protection.
On question from Mi.. Sidor, Mr. Ellison stated the
Sewer would be extended from Geosling Road across to
Capricorn. They are currently usin3 septic systems.
Mr. Jucan made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of the City of Denton for annexation of ap-
proximately 65.12 acres beginning 350 foot south of and
perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Highway 380 and
east of Geesling Road (Capricorn Mobile Home Park and
surrounding properties) (A-13). Seconded by Mr. Sidor
and unanimously carried (6-0).
C. Recommend approval of the petition of the City of
Denton for annexation of approximately 42.35 acres of
land situated in tho S. Huisar Survey, Abstract 514,
and beginning approximately $00 feet north of and
perpendicular to the concertina of US Highway 380
i and west of Masch Branch Road (A-LS).
Mr. CLlison stated this annexation rep:esencs the
balance of the Tri-Steel Str=turre, lac., proputy
DATE: 1/31/66
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FQRMAT q' D.
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY
93.67 ACRES OF LAND BEGINNING 354 FEET SOUTH OF AND PERPENDICULAR TO
THE CENTER LINE OF US HNY 380 AND EAST OF GEESLING ROAD (CAPRICORN
MOBILE HOME PARK AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY) (A-13)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its
meeting of March 130 1985,
NUMMARY:
This is one of six annexations being reprocessed due to an error in
publication procedures.
The Holigan Development Corporation proposed expansion and
improvement of the existing Capricorn Mobile Home Park to
precipitate this annexation petition. The existing mobile home park
is situated on approximately 30 acres and an additional 63+ acres
was proposed for mobile home land use (approximately 6-7 units per
acre projected). Upgraded utility service to the existing mobile
home park in a potential plus of the proposal. Continuation of the
pattern of concentrating manufactured/mobile home park land use in
east Denton was a major factor and policy quebtion. A strip of the
existing park and property along 380 frontage is already in the city
limits. The plans for Holigan Development's expansion of Capricorn
Mobile Home Park have not been followed through on to date.
BACKGROUND:
A preliminary plat of the existing and proposed expansion area was
submitted for review by the Development Review Committee. The City
Council issued a directive to staff to initiate the annexation
process at its meeting of December 18, 1984. The Planning and Zoning
Commission, Public Utilities Board, and City Council approved a
request for extension of City water to the site.
As stated earlier, plans for expansion of the existing mobile home
park have not continued to date. The engineering firm for Holigan
Development corporation has informed staff of no request for action
or ad& tional work during the past eight months.
I
A-13
Page 2
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Building Inspection, Solid Waste, golice and Fire would have to
provide services immediately upon annexation. Tnere are
approximately 150 residents of Capricorn Mobile !tome Park.
Projected population if original plans for development ever occurs
as proposed is 1,625.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Re ectf ly au itt
kick Svehla
Acting City Manager
Prepared by:
~n
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App
Jeff MeySr---,- •C__+..
Director of Planning
and Development
10549
1013L
0
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL
OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 93.67 ACRES OF LAND LYING
AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND
BEING PART OF THE M. FORREST SURVEY, ASSTRACT NO. 417, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was Afforded, a.t a pub }is hearing
hold for that purpose on the day of V O rv1 0P V , 1985
in the Council Chambers fora intereaLed persons to state
their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was,afforded, at a pub is hearing
held for that purpose on the Alday of e'rn be -Y , 1985
or aII- interested persons to state
in the Council Chambers for-
their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW,
THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which mayy hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate
part of the taxoa levied by the City. The tract of land hereby
annexed is deac:ibad as follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part
of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, and more
particularly described as follows:
Tract I: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as
es3- erred in Ordinance No. 69-40, Tract V, said point lying 350
feet south of and perpendicular to the center line of U. S. 380
and in the east boundary line of Lot 4, Block A of the
subdivision of srid Forrest Survey, same being the east boundary
line of a tract conveyed to FSCS Company by deed recorded in
Volume 1099, Page 923 of the Dead Records of Denton County,
Texas;
THENCE south 1°40' west, along the east boundary line of said
lot and tract, a distance of 339.51 feet to a point for a
A-13/CAPRICOMI 16PN//PAGE ONE
IWI -7 77
I
corner, same being the southeast corner of said lot and tract;
THENCE north 87°07'30" west, along the south boundary line of
said lot and tract, a distance of 545.26 feet to a point for a
corner, same being the southwest corner of said tract;
THENCE north 1°03'40" west, along the west boundary line of said
tract, a distance of 227.9 feet to a point for a corner to the
said city limits;
THENCE north 81°26' east, along said city limits, 350 feet south
of and parpendloular to the center line of said U.S. 380, a
distance of 564.97 feet to the place of beginning and containing
3.59 acres of lane!, more or less.
Tract II: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of a tract of land
conveys to FSCS Co. by dead recorded in Volumo 1197, Page 564
of the dead records of Denton County, Texas, same being the
northwest corner of Lot 10, Block A of the subdivision of the M.
Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, said point also lying in the
east line of a north and south county road known as Geesling
Road;
THENCE north 87°04'17" east, along the north boundary 11,ne of
said tract and lot, passing the eouthweat corner of the above
described Tract I, a distance of 1485.18 feet to a point for a
corner;
THENCE north 86°56'59" east, continuing along said lines, a
distance of 1379.92 feet to a point for a corner, samo being the
northeast corner of said FSCS Co. tract and Lot 11, Block A of
said subdivision;
THENCE south 2°53'35" east along the east boundary line of said
FSCS tract and Lot 11, a distance of 379.39 feet to a point for
a corner, same being the southeast corner of said FSCS tract;
THENCE south 86°59'04" west along the south boundary line of
said FSCS tract, a distance of 2527.35 feet to a point;
THENCE south 87°18'40" west, continuing along said south
boundary line, a distance of 338.60 feet to a point for a
cornar, same being the southwest corner of said FSCS tract and
in the east line of said county road;
THENCE north 1°45'51" west along the west boundary line of said
FSCS tract and the east line of said county road, a distance of
379.69 feet to the place of beginning and containing 24.96 acres
of Land, more or leas.
Tract III: BEGINNIIG of the northwest corner of a tract of land
convoys to James H. Russell, Jr. by dead recorded in Volume
5780 Page 515 of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texas, same
being the southwest corner of the above described Tract II, said
point also lying in the east lint of a north and south county
road known as Geesling Road;
THENCE south 89°32'49" east along the north boundary line of
said Russell tract, some being the south boundary line of the
above described Tract II, a distance of 338.12 feet to A point;
THENCE south 89°50'58" east, continuing along said lines, a
distance of 2526.83 feet to a point for a corner, same being the
southeast corner of said above described Tract II;
A-13/CAPRIC•IRN MPH//PACE TWO
THENCE south 0°17'1'," aast, a distance of 663.40 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 89"56'21" west, a distance of 712.0 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 89°24'39" west, a distance of 728.48 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE south 0°07'52" east, a distance of 985.11 feet to a point
for a corner, said point lying in the north line of the east and
west county road known as Slagg Road;
THENCE north 89°54'30" west along the north line of Blaga Road,
a distance of 719.56 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north 0°05'30" east, a distance of 365 feat to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 89°54'30" west, a distance of 36.28 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 46°13'49" east, a distance of 43,10 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 89°59'49" west, a distance of 549.5 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 40°27'41" west, a distance of 255.8 feet to a point
for a corner, said point lying in the east line of Geesling
Road; and the west boundary line of said Russell tract;
THENCE north 0°00'11" west, along the west boundary line of said
Russell tract and east line of Geesling Road, a distance of
459.04 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 89°54'18" east, a distance of 337.0 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 0055115" east, a distance of 538.17 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 89°27'34" west, a distance of 337 feet to a point
for a corner in the east line of said Geesling Road;
THENCE north 0°30'22" west, along the east line of Geesling
Road, a distance of 59.37 feet to the place of beginning and
containing 65.12 acres of land, more or less.
SECTION II.
The above described property is hereby classified as
Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the 17 1t- day of
~ac.embe+; 1985.
I
A-13/CAPRICORN MPH//PACE THREE
a
PAFJSEL AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1486.
RICHAR15 0. SMART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY ETAR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
A-13/CAPRICORN MPH//PAGE FOUR
nr a
m M-1 C A A A DENT ON, LriXA$
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that * plan of service
q adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
ndxing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
1. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
Lad equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established hstappropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C . Wat er
(1) Waster for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will bet provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the Annexed areas will be connected
tc sewer lines in Accordance with article 4,09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas.
E. Refuse C"ollect ion
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
slate of annexation.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardoum
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
a. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the,effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the clty.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation, The same standards and
policies now used in the present.city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
R. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
v
Servies Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 8 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide.
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on,density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in tho
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP p'aaaing year the
annexation area will be fudged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
i
a
07
♦ J
i
all
i. i, ~ ~r • ~ I
-tw
1 48%,
1. ~
~ 'T, ! ln` ~ f~ ~'1 rr • .....rte'
it .
t
,I a
I .
•
1
• I ~
flit
•
I
•a
A-13
ANNSXAI'100 S%:ddOULd
✓ Oetobur 14, Isd6 Submit agenda item
✓Octooer 291 Idd6 Submit agenda uacK-up
t/e Nova~nuar 5, 19dti City Council sets date, time and place
for puulie nearing
tl oovemoor b, 19dy Notice to Denton Record Cnronicie
November d, 19d5 OU011sn notice and mailout
._,-4ovaiAoer ll,i9d6 Summit agenda item
✓November 12,19dd Submit agenda bacK-up
L-4' November 19, 1946 City Council nolds first public nearing
ova,nuar 2U, 19d6 Notice to Denton Record Cnronicle
t-- November 12, 1986 I)uolisn notice and mailout
L-'Ovamber 25, 1965 Suomit agenda item
41, NOVOIAUer 181 19d6 Submit agenda JACK-Up
DecelnOer 3, 19d3 city Council nolus second public hearing
December 90 19dy Submit dgdnda ita►n
✓becember lu, 1986 Suomit agenda uacK-up
Deeambar 17, 19d6 City Council institutes annexation
proceedings
/~cemo er id, 19dd Ordinance to canton Record Carooicle
Dece,noer 10, 1985 Puciisn ordinance
✓ January 13, 19dd Suomit agenda iLe.n
✓January 14, 1986 Suomit agenda baCK-up
* January 21, 19dd final act wn. by City Council
* Denotes action by the City Council
M 4g
p i = 1~1AUtq
"Arab 130 19x!
Page 9
City council 4ireeted staff io begin annexation pro-
eess. He continued due to delays in obtaining a proper
legal description, changes in staff r s ponsibilities,
and questions concerning utilities servicer processing
of the annexation petition has boon slower than usual.
He added electric service is available from both the
City of Denton and TPiL, water service must be planned
service Ac" and extending Ciitybecause
Of e0eit t it ntonuine nis not la
feasible alternative. Sewer service is to be provided
by the City of Denton. The Development Review Committee
has reviewed a preliminary plat of the proposed develop-
ment. woodcreek Subdivision and has withheld a recommend-
ation of approval pending comments and acceptance of the
Argyle Water Company for requested sale of water.
Mr. I,alorte made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of the City Of Denton for annexation of approx-
imately 136.58 acres beginning approximately $00 feet
east of the centerline of U.S. Highway 377 and south
of crush Creek Road (A-11). Seeondd by Mr. Sidor and
unanimously carried (6-0).
0. Recommend approval of the petition of the City of Denton
for annexation Of approximately 65.12 acres beginning
350 lest south of mad perpendicular to the centerline
of U.S. Highway 380 and east of Geeslinq Road (Ca ricorn
Mobile Hose Park and surrouading properties) (A-13)0
Mr. bllison stated the Holigan Development Corporation
wishes to expand and improve the existing Capricorn
Mobile Hose Park. the existing park is situated on
approximatsly 30 acres and an additional 63 plus acres
is proposed for Mobile hose land use at approximately
6 to 7 units per acre. Upgraded utility service to the
existing Mobile home park is a potential plus of the
proposal- He continue4, a preliminary plat of the area
Th pCity Council issued has diceetive to tstaff to review.
the annexation process of the existing park and proposers
area of expansion at its meeting of December 18, 1984.
He added the Planning and Zoning Caanission, the Public
Utilities Board and the City Council approved a request
for the extension of City utilities to the site. He
added, the city will have to provide water, sewer, and
police protection.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. illison started the
sewer would be extended from Geestiny Road 4crosa to
Capricorn. They are currently usln4 septic systems.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of the City of Denton for annexation of ap-
proximately 65.12 acres bafinning 350 loot south of and
perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Highway 380 and
• st of OeesLinq Road (Capricorn Mobile Home Park and
surrounding properties) (A-13). Seconded by Mr. Sidor
and unanimously carried (6-0),
C. Recommend approval of the petition of ere City of
Denton for annexation of approximately 42.35 acres of
land situated in the S. Huitar Survey, Abstract 514,
and beginning approximately 500 lest north of and
perpendicular to the centerline of US Highway 380
and west Of Meech Branch Roan (A-15).
Mr. Ellison stated this annexation represents the
bmlaaeo of the Tri-Steel Steecturee, fee., property
bm¢~AN~ till AOts~leai
at t
i t< .te4
r . r~s , ' DAZ'R .t
l/Zllii
CI'T'Y COUNCIL RRPORT l0pi{i1T
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council '
PROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECTi ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND APPROXIMATELY
42.35 ACRES IN SIZE BEING PART OF THE S. HUIZAR SURVEY, ABSTRACT 514
AND BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF AND PERPENDICULAR TO
THE CENTER LINE OF U9 HIGHWAY 380 AND WEST OF MASCH BRANCH ROAD
(A-15)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.
SUMMRY i
This is one of six annexations being reprocessed due to an error in
the publication process.
This site represents the balance of the Tri-Steel structures, Inc.
property beginning north of 380 West and west of Masch Branch Road.
Zoning and plat approval for a five acre office site was approved by
the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
No development has occurred to date.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council directed staff to annex the entire Tri-Steel
Structures, Inc. property in October 1984.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDi
No population or housing exists at the site
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Re ctf ly su itt :
Prepared by:, ick S h a
00ji U= Acting City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
ApprovIV
Jeff Meyer
Director of Planning
and Development 06938
NU.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL
OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 42.35 ACRES OF LAND LYING
AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND
BEING PART OF THE S. HUIZAR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 514, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of Tri-Steel Structures, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was fforded, a a public hearing
held for that purpose on the /VZAday of 1985 in
the Council Chambers for all ntereated persona to state their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a pu lic hearing
held for that purpose on theta day of ec.e-m Y, 1985 in
the Council Chambers for All Tnterested persons to state their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW,
THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made hereby a part of said Citq and the land and the
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter bot enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate
part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby
annexed is described as follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of
the S. Huizar Survey, Abstract No. 514, and more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as described in
Ordinance No. 74-36, Tract 5, said point lying 500 feet north of
and perpendicular to the center line of U. S. Hwy. 380 and in
the west boundary line of a tract of land conveyed to John F.
Brown by deed recorded in Volume 1092, Page 748 of the Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE north 0°49'16" west along the west boundary line of said
Brown tract, a distance of 969.60 feet to a point for a corner,
same being the northwest corner of said Brown tract;
THENCE north 89°02'33" east along the north boundary line of
said brown tract, a distance of 2090.55 feet to a point for a
A-15/TRI-STtZL STiU1CTURES, INC./PAGE ONE
i
~r
corner, same being the northeast corner of said Brown tract,
said point lying in the west line of a north and south county
road known as Masch Branch :toad;
THENCE south 1°23'18" east along the east boundary line of said
Brown tract, same being & west line of said county road, a
distance of 555.7 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 88°35'24" west, a distance of 390.89 feet to a
point for a corner, said point lying in the center of a creek;
THENCE southerlyy along the center line of said creek the
following five (5) calls: (1) south 12 54008" east,, 95.07 feet;
(2) south 56°16'35" west 178.4 feet; (3) south 8748'54" west,
106.69 feet; (4) south 20 57'02" west, 132.88 feet; (5) south
51°07'11" east 218.41 feet to a point for a corner in the said
present city limits;
THENCE north 89°21'56" west, along the said present city limits
c distance of 1587.90 feet to the place of beginning and
containing 42.35 acres of land, more or less.
SECTION II.
The above described property is hereby classified as
Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION M.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage.
Intro used before the City Council on the day of
_2ec t'mreyo , 1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
, 198f.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.,
A-15/TRI-STEEL STRUCTIlM9 INC./PAGE TWO
PLM OF FOR HEM ARM C 9MM1 Tan
WHEREAS, Article 970& as amended requires that a plan of service
9 adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
sexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOWp THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CrTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texaa Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established•by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effect v a date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) hater for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09. of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
777
too Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardou
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(Z) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
0. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
R. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning Jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially deveioped arena in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive plate of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present. city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
lectric power.
Service pt",
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
i '
I
A.15
i
Ln
A-15
ANNEXATION SCdSDULS
Oetouer 2d, 1985 Saomit agenda item
Octooer 19, 19dj Suomit agenda oACK-up
C-,*Aovamoar 51 19th City Council Seta date, time and place
for puoiic nearing
y--t 4amner u, l9d5 Notice to Jenton Record Cnronicle
9-1 Sovemoer d, 1985 Vuolien notice and mailout
Nuvemoor 11,19d5 ,Suomit agenda item
Novemuer 1101985 Suomit agenda oaCk-up
Nuvetwer 19, 198* City Council nold$ first punlic nearing
~ovemoer ZU, 19d5 Notice to Denton Record Cnronicle
✓ Novelnoec 22, 19d5 8uolisn notice and mailout
i-~1,4ovamuer ?5, 1985 Suomit agenda item
L.-ttttivemver 16, 19dy suumit agenda oaeK-up
a*~Decembar 3, 1985 City Council nolds second public nearing
t/ Decemoer 9, 19d5 Suomit agenda item
t,.e,6ece,noer IU, 1985 Suomit agenda back-up
~Decemver 17, 19d6 Cicy Council institutes annexation
proceedings
L.-"camoor Ids 19d5 ordinance to uentun Record Cnronicle
W.Xuecemoer lU, 19d5 puolish ordinance
January 13, 19" Suomit agenda iteia
`fJanuary 14, 19d6 Suoinit agenda bacK-up
* January 21, 19dti Final action oy city council
* Denotes action oy cne City Council
09649
71 s.~ ..r WF "p' 4~i ` .-t
r a = 111nates
March 13. 19i5
Page 9
City Council directed staff to begin annexation pro-
case. He continued due to delays in obtaining a proper
Legal description, changes in staff COSpensibilities,
and queetLons concerning utilities savviest processing
of the annexation petition has been slower than USUAL,
He added electric service is available from both the
City of Denton and TP"v Mater Service Must be plannrd
in conjunction with ArgyLs, because it too is in a dual
service area and extending City of Denton mains is not a
feasible alternative. Sewer service is to be provided
by the City of Denton. The Development Review Committee
has reviewed A preliminary plat of the proposed develop-
ment, Woodcreek Subdivision and has withheld a recommend-
ation of approval pending comments And acceptance of the
Argyle Mater Company for requested sale of water.
Mr. Lalorte made A motioei to recommend approval of the
petition of the City of Denton for annexation of approx-
imately 136.58 acres beginning approximately 500 feet
seat of the centerline of U.S. Highway 377 and south
of Brush Creek Road (A-lL), Seconded by Mr. Sidor and
unanimously carried (6-0).
1. Recommend approval of the petition of the City of Denton
for annexation of approximately 65.12 Acres beginning
350 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline
of U.S. Highway 380 and east of OesSLing Road (Capricorn
Mobile Home Park and surrounding properties) (A-13).
Mr. Ellison stated the Holigan Development Corporation
wishes to expand and improve the extAting Capricorn
Mobile Home Park. The existing park is situated on
approximately 30 acres and an additional 63 plus acres
is proposed for mobile home land use at approximately
6 to 7 units par acre. Upgraded utility service to the
existing mobs a home park is a potential plus of the
proposal. He continuer!, a preliminary plot of the area
proposd
Council issued a sdireen ectiv eto t ssdtaff for review.
einitiate
the annexation process of the existing park and proposed
area of expansion At its meeting of December 18, 1984.
He added the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Public
Utilities Board and the City Council approved a request
for the extension of City utilities to the site. He
added, the city will have to provide water, sewer, and
police protection.
On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Ellison stated the
sewer would be extended front Oeesllnq Road across to
Capricorn, They are currently using septic systems.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of the City of Denton for annexation of ap-
proximately 65.12 acres beginning 350 feet south of and
perpendicular to the centerline of U.S. Highway 380 and
east of Oeasling Road (Capricorn Mobile Home Park and
surrounding prcparties) (A-13). Seconded by Mr. Sidor
and unanimously carried (6-0).
C. Recommend approval of the petition of the City of
Denton for Annexation of approximately 42.35 acres of
land situated in the S. Huizar Survey, Abstract 5140
and beginning approximately 500 feet north of and
Wrpendicular to the centerline of US Highway 380
and west of Mooch Branch Road (A-15).
Mr. Bllison stated this annexation represents the
balance of the Tri-Steal Structures, Inc., property
beginning at the northeast si"ner o9 3" '""t said
` ~z z ' •3'~.- +r. ,n c ~p"y'x-F t. `.y..z` °~'y" a °a~a~e. ev*s. ,~asd` H'.FS~'p•.Y,,~kFT.t~Ss.'t..+ C s '~'~`'~.°.b!i
s k>I~~~~ 1` 3 , r
March 13, lost
lase 10
MasCA Branch Road. Zanfng mad let a
acre office site has bash rsv,)Owed andpaeceptaj for by the
e
Planning and Zoning Co•missioli and City Co. T
City Council directed stagf to man uncil
ex the entire Tri-
Steel Structures, Inc., property the October, re T
p nding theosubeisiloanoE af proeparcel was delaye on.
He added this is an involuntary annexation; nawerer,
the property owner has not objected co date.
Mr. Sidor Made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of tae City of Deatba for annexation of approx-
imately 42.3S acres of land ``situated in the S. Huisar
8 approximately 300
feetenorthsotct faandSporpendicuiarnto the centerline of
U.S, Highway 340 and west of Masch Branch Road (A-lg).
L-$m,conded by Mr. LaForte and unanimously carried (6-0).
D. Recommend approval of the petition of Redditch
Investments Corporation for annexation of approximately
13308 andebeginning dadi the jacent G. a east ofrEdwardssRoadt
(A-18).
Mr. Ellison stated the petitioners have submitted a
request for voluntary annexation to the Planning and
Community Development Department, Tuis site is adjacent
and east of Edwards Road an unimproved dirt road that
must be upgraded, City will be responsible for main
tanebCe and paving o? this dirt road unless development
occurs before annexation is final. Low intensity
Development Guide policies are a
He continued, the Allan Estates 4ouile*Homotoparklssitite'
(S-10S) is located adjacent and west of Edwards Road.
Existing Andrew Corporation facilities and property is
also located in tuis vicinity. Current land use
patterns along the Mayhiil load eorrLior range from low
and moderate density residential co cao City Wastewater
Treatment Plant and new landfill and lignt industrial.
Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of the
petition of Redditch Investments Corporation for An-
nexation of approximatly 00.38 acres situated in the
4. Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and beginning adjacent
and east of Edwards Road (A-18). Seconded by Mr, Escue
and unanimously carried (0-0).
E. Rc+ndardd Saecifications for Public IaVorktin" thructionand
ort satra exas as t e spec cat ons or use in
'Tt
c c u ore public works water utilit
priv ate development projects for the City of Denton,
Mr. Clark explained tae request for adoption and stated
Denton is a member of the North Texas Council of Govern-
meats. Rick Svenla, Assistant City Manager, neipea put
the specifications to etner, Mr. Jim a member of sev3ral N COG CoaMictees. RHedgaveeaglistsof
cities wao save already adopted the specifications. He
continued, cnere are a lot of contractors commenting
that everytime tney come to 1?e,1ton, taey find soaething
different regarding specifications. He stated tae city
would like to adopt a set of standards with few excep-
tions or variations to serve as a legitimate guide.
He added, the NTCOG uas an arrosion control chapter in
tneir storm management section, and we would like to
include that. He pointed out cne sampie ordinance for
Cagissioa to view saa would rec.ogepd
tlteae # aid#. 88A±f t
`fd'+ -artwn.-t .r[t+gSt3"='^3_*' ~c+ y'€..:. ra. ~w : 9. ~Ra~. TM^Nrst^. m.: w. -s~i 'rr qYS _g~yihy "~'H''Tr.l
v ,ir
CITY COUNCIL RBFOR'Y FORMAT
9.~
TO: Mayor and K*Mbers of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN INSTITUTING AMXEXATION OF
801.705 ACRES SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. i P.R.R. SURVEY, ABSTRACT 14701
THE E.F. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 161 THE E.A. ORR SURVEY, ABSTRACT
9831 THE G.W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 121 THE H.E.P. i P.R.R.
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 15021 AND THE T a P SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1302, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXASI BEING PART OF A TRACT KNOWN AS THE GOLDEN HOOF RANCH
AND BEGINNING SOUTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 3800 EAST OF F.M. 1560 AND MEET
OF SG" ROAD (A-32)
RECOMMENDATION:
A Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation will be :suede on
January 22, 1986.
BACKGROUNDS
This is a voluntary annexation request by Miller of Texaa, Inc. The
purpose of the annexation is to seek zoning. The site is located
approximately 11,000 feet or roughly 2 miles northwest of the
existing runway of the Denton Municipal Airport. The site is on the
fringe of the general area controlled by the Airport Zoning Act, but
outside of the area controlled by the Municipal Airport Zoning
Regulations. A conceptual development plan is attached, but a
formal petition for zoning has not been made.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
There are no existing structures, residenc6s or population included
in the area proposed for annexation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
spec 4W
Prepared by: Rick Svehla
~u Acting City Manager
ll
David Ellison
Senior Planner
App ved
Mey
Jeff
Director of Planning
and Developmz~nt 10499
Alf,
d.' ♦ ~_m v.gfgas-•-_~"~".TW. T` .r'^.i .st ~ri iF,r+ a~ i-s r '9Fi.~RS.^~s~'4' _ i' `y."{
r•.
1270L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL
Of LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 765.1 ACRES OF LAND LYING
AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DBUTONO STATE OF TEXAS AND
BEING PART OF THE E. A. ORR SURVEY, AIS ACT N0. 983; THE T to P
RAILROAD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1302 TU MEF Ny PRA CO. SURVEY,
ABSTRACT HUMBER 1470; THE MEP i PRi CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
1502; THE E. F. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 00. 16; AND THE G. M.
ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 12, DENTON COUNTYs TEXAS, CLASSIFYING
THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS an opportunity was al%rded, at publi hearing
hold for that purpose on the day of e ,
1985 in the Council Chambers for aIT iataresta parsons to state,
their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at & _public hearing
held for that purpose on the 7-Cb day of y ,
1986 in the Council Chambers for a interested parsons to to e
their views and present ovidenee bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
S6C'Z'ION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
sam is Wade hereby a part of said City and the land and the
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the sets and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which say hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate
part of the taxes levied by t City. The tract of land hereby
annexed is described as follows, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated iu the E.A.
Orr Survey Abstract Number 983; the T&P Railroad Survey,
Abstract Number 1112, the MEP i PRA Co- Survey, abstract Number
1470; The MW i PAR Co. Survey, Abstract No. 1502; the E.F.
Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 16; and the G.W. Anderson Survey,
Abstract Number 12, and being sore particularly described as
follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established
by Ordinance No. 74-360 Tract v, said point lying at the
intersection of the West boundary line of said Tract Y with the
South right-of-way line of State Highway U.S. 380;
A-32/9ILLE1 OF TUAS/PIGS ONE
a
aw-,_v ::.fix rs-^'1:: ,.y.i•Ygs: Y-~S ;5• Sl4z easy _ _.u ~a:,Y ,.,,r+''*x-T, `F°x 7$yw,..
y` N
THENCE South 6° 54' 44" Hest, along said present city limits, a
distance of 450 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE South 83° 05' 16" East, Along said present city limits, a
distance of 3,284 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left
with a radius of 11,959-16 foot, a central angle of 2° 39' 04"
and a chord of South 84 261 41 East, 553.31 feet;
THENCE Easterly along said curve and city limits, an are
distance of 553.36 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE South 00° 10' 27" West along and near a fence a distance
of 1,886.11 feet to a steel pin at a fence corner;
THENCE South 89° 59' 47" East with a fence a distance of 1,174.8
feet to a steel pin in Egan Road;
THENCE South 09° 03' 21" East with said Egan Road a distance of
10400.0 feet to a steal pin at the intersection of Egan Road
with Jim Christal Road, also being on the South line of said
E.A. Orr Survey;
THENCE North 89° 55' 00" West with said Jim Christal Road and
with the South line of said E.A. Orr and TiP Railroad Surveys a
distance of 3,941.44 feet to a steel pin for corner;
THENCE North 00° 05' 00" East a distance of 1,550.0 feet to a
steel pin for corner;
THENCE North 89° 55' 00" West a distance of 1,405.16 feet to a
steel pin for corner;
THENCE South 0010 05' 00" Wait a distance of 1,550.0 feet to a
steel pin on the South line of said T4P Railroad Survey and in
Jim Christal Road;
THEM North 89° 55' 00" West with said Jim Christal Road and
with the South line of said UP Railroad Survey and South line
of said MRP i PRR Co. Survey, Abstract Number 1470 part of the
way a distance of 3,184.5 feet to a steel pin in the intersection
of Jim Ctriatal Road and Nail Road;
THENCE North 81° 37' 14" West with said Jim Christal Road a
distance of 901.0 feet to a steel pin for cornea;
THENCE North 78° 12' 00" West with said Jim Christal Road a
distance of 1,144.02 feet to a steel pia on a West line of said
MEP i PRR Co. Survey Abstract Number 1502 also being the East
line of P.A. Collins purvey, Abstract No. 356;
THENCE North 00° 02' 13" East with said survey line and with a
fence a distance of 353.5 feet to a fence corner at the North-
east corner of said Collins Survey;
THENCE North 88° 57' 59" West with a South line of said MEP S
PRR Co. Survey, Abstract number 1502 and the South line of said
Anderson Survey and with a face* a distance of 1,510.16 feet to
a fence corner post on the southeast right-of-way of A.T. L S.F.
Railroad, and being 75.0 feet from the center of said railroad;
THENCE North 28' 52' 21" East with said railroad right-of-way a
distance of 1,073.73 feet to a steel pin for corner;
A-32/MILLER OF TEXAS/PACE TWO
1 ZJy#P f"'.`~ x€ x°4 a4;AAaa9N `•s~#..y~ ry6r.{7
ytTHENCE North 61° 07' 39" West with said railroad right-of-way a
distance of 25.0 feet to a steel pin, which is 50.0 feet from
the ceater of said railroad;
THENCE North 28° 52' 21" Bast with said railroad right-of-way a
distance of 840.0 feet to a steel pin for corner; alon
near THENCE North feetsto 32' 21
a steels pin in Nail R ad, alseo cbeing lon the
EaaL line of said Anderson Survey, and a West line of said MEP 6
PRR Co. Suiiey, Abstract No. 1470;
THENCE North 00° 11' 16" West with said Nail Road and with the
East it line of said PRR Co. Srvey distanceuofe400.01hf oo t to as steel epin ati
MEP a
bend in said road and being the Northeast corner of said
Anderson Survey;
THENCE North 89° 48' 44" East with said Nail Road and with a
North line of said MEP 6 PRR Co. Survey a distance of 197.2 feet
to a steel pin in a bend of said Nail Road also being the
Southeast corner of U. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 14 also being
an inner corner of said MEP 6 PRR Co. Survey, Abstract Number
1470;
THENCE North 00° 11' 16" West with a West line of said MEP it PRR
Co. Survey and with Nail Road a distance of 1,675.2 feet to
point for a corner;
THENCE South 33° 05' 16" East along the South right-of-way line
of said U.S. 380 a distance of 3,153.47 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 765.1 acres of land more or less.
SECTION II.
The above described property is hereby classified as
Agricultural A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION ^ M.
I .
Should any section or part of this ordinance be held
unconstitutional, illegal or invalid$ or the application thereof
ineffective or snapcable as to any territory, such unconsti-
tutionality, illegality invalidity or ineffectiveness of such
section or part shall Ln no wise affect, impair or invalidate
the raaaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such
remaining portion or portions, the some shall be and remain in
full force and effect; and should this ordinance for any reason
be ineffective as to any part of the area hereby annexed to the
City of Denton, such ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any
such part or parts of any such area shall not affect the
effectiveness of this ordinance as to all of the remainder of
such area, and the City Council hereby declares it to be its
purpose to annex to the City of Denton every part of the area
described in Section I of this ordinance, regardless of whether
any other part of suah described area is hereby effectively
annexed to the City. Provided, further, that if there is
included within the general description of territory set out in
Section I of this Ordinance to be hereby annexed to the City of
Denton any lands or area which are presently part of and
included within the limits of the City of Denton, or which are
A-32/MILLER OF TEXAS/PAGE THREE
~yc,~-a x `~'r~?Ss±a n.~,;'.f •f: h .~.p-r sr _r,+; 's .r,, > R,: -~;rr- v~~~s~.e.+r!';.. u-rps n
presently part of and included within the Baits of anyy other
City, Town or Village, or which are not within the Cit of
nton
De's jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby ascluded and
excepted from the territory to be hereby annexed as fully as if
such excluded and excepted area were expressly described herein.
SECTION IV.
This ordioanoe shall be effective immdiately upon its
passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the day of
1986.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
.1986.
CITY OF DENTOH, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DiAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF D6NTON, TEXAS
HY:
i
I
A-31/NILLER OF TEXAS/PADZ FOUR
"'Wlaw 7.11K,
PLAx or SERVICE h'OR ANN= AREA. CITY OF DMITM, T88AS
I
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEM ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09.. of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
F. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within tte city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
77.
service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jv:risdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation, The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will br,, fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K, Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends she use of City of Denton for
electric power.
x ""ri F~ ~ e• rs`•a~;s .hl~,' '4~snr iT .~:;5' ` ~y'7 f?~"'r'.^ ~.~r a r .
service Plats
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In thijq new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
F
_ r+y
i
KRUM 1 00
I-pop 4 $6 0 4 1%, s
~•vrl+
~ t
% "'Q6 eke
'
C^►
FAP r.
. • • • • . • • • • ! r 1
r~ •~r . v i .iii • •A• AAA! • •a••
b.
16
N • ,.001 1o
Tom 6..,01 • -
•o ~
Rd•
Annyk ft do
Alec
f
►i►~y►.» ~ awiia
1
Il \ VON-"
awns w W-90
1
►•Ia ;
. we ni.
CkVIVIN A.,
A1
C%HW.4cL ROAD \,"J
poll
MROPLJEx
alwoumaKFUNo
COAPOAATION
~+as err wo~nK ow~t
cww"3K HIP
ris~s+~ two err
1 ,
A-32
ANNBxArtuW SCHEDULE
Nove,wer 26, 1985 auomit City Council agenda item
Novomaer 170 i9d5 Suamit amity Council agenda oacK-up
~f Uecamoer J. 1985 City Council acts data, time and place
for puolic nearing
Jeee~,oer 4, 1985 Lvutic+a to Denton Record Cnronicle
Decamoer 60 1965 OUOlisn notice and mailout
December 91 1985 Suornit City Council agenda item
;/Deceinoer lU, 19d5 Suo,ntt City Council agenda oack-up
Decesw er 17, 1986 City Council nolds first puolic nearing
i✓Dacember 2U, 1967 Notice to Denton AeCOrd Cnronicle
t/ Ueceinuer 27, 19d5 duulisn nutice and m4ilout
4,--'OeComoar 3U, 1985 Suoinlt City Council agenda item
~ecemoer,31, 1965 Suomit City Council agenda oack-up
January 70 19d6 City Council holds second pun,ic nearing
January 13, 19x6 SuaInit Citx' Council agenda itam
,✓January 14, 1986 Suo,r,it City Council agenda oack-up
* January 21, 1966 City Council adopts ordinance anu
service plan instituting annexation
proceedings
January 24, 1986 Crdiou nce to Dentun Record Cnronicle
January 26F 1986 Nuuiisn oruinance
Peoruary 25, 1986 Suoinit City Council agenda item
Feoruary 26, 19d6 Suu,nit City Council agenda oaCK-up
* march 4, 1936 Adoption of final annexation urdinance
and service plan oy City Council
* Uenotds action oy the City Council
09649
CM COUNIL 1002? 70MA!
n
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE 80TTING A DATE, TINE AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS CONCERNING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 614.6
ACRES BEGINNING NORTH OF OLD ALTON ESTATES, SOUTH OF RYAN ROAD, WEST
OF FM 2181, AND EAST OF THE G.C.d S.F. RAILROAD (A-30)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the public hearings be held on February 4 and
February 18, 1986.
SUMMARY:
This is a 614 acre parcel including existing development ranging
from scattered low density residential and agricultural to heavy
commercial. The annexation request is voluntary on an approximately
160 acre portion and the balance is involuntary on the part of the
City of Denton. Preliminary plans for the Dutton Manor Estates
Subdivision along the south aide of Hickory Creek Road has led to or
represented only a small portion of overall rumors and inquiries
concerning development along the Hickory Creek Road corridor. This
annexation appears to be a logical and necessary extension of the
city limits into an area that is already within reasonably close
distance of existing utilities.
BACKGROUND:
Staff informed the City Council of the need to consider annexation
of additional property in this area during the time that Council was
considering annexation of 117 acres along the south side of Hickory
Creek Road.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt
All City departments responsible for delivering basic services.
Owners and residents of property within the area of proposed
annexation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
espec ully J'X
Prepared by: /l•~Rick Svehla
Acting City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
AP ov
Director of Planning
and Development 0052k/2
CITY CUUNC'i, AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance setting the date, time,
and place for public hearings concerning the
proposed annexation of approximately 614.6 acres
beginning north of old Alton 13states, south of
Ryan Road, west of FM 2181, and east of G.C.$
S.F. Railroad (A-30).
SUMMARY: In the last stages of 1985 rumors and develop-
ment inquires for property along Hickory Creek
Road persisted at a rate faster or as fast as
any area of the City and its 11TJ. Preliminary
plans for the 63 acre Dunton Manor Subdivision
prompted annexation of 117 acres along the south
side of Hickory Road (A-27). The Dunton Manor
project has not developed, but interest in this
area continues.
Richard Compton and Button-2ii'f Properties,
owners of approximately 80 and 75 acres,
respectively, have petitioned for annexation.
The City of Denton is the petitioner on the
balance of the property. Botts petitioners own
property along the north side of Hickory Creek
Road, both either have or will petition for
planned development (PD). A 100+ acre tract
south of Hickory Creek Road beginning adjacent
and we,;t of the recently annexed 117 acres has
also been the subject of development inquiries.
Staff has had numerous discussions with the
owners cf the 200 acres, but no preliminary
planning has been done to date. The suggestion
that annexation be requested for the 200 acre
site has not been followed through on by the
owners.
Richard Compton has advised :;taff of information
reportedly given to him by At-.me Brick Company
indicating that excavation w)rk will begin or be
intensified in the near future on 80 acres
between Ryan Road and Hickor;( Creek Road.
.
t
City Council beck-Up'
January 21, 1966
Page 2
Annexation of the 614 acres in this request
would form a logical boundary and extension of
the city limits into an area seemingly in need
of greater land use control, particular given
its relatively close distance from existing city
limits and existing City utilities.
Hickory Creek Road and a small portion of the
C.'t. $ B.F. Railroad would be included in the
annexation as currently proposed. Existing
development located within the 614 acre area
ranges from scattered low density residential
and agricultural use to heavy commercial. Old
Alton Estates is not included in the annexation
as presently proposed.
ACTION REQUIRED: Adoption of ordinance setting date, time, and
place for public hearings.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the publiz hearings be held on
February 4th and February 18th.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Ordinance
2. Deny Ordinance
ATTACHMENT: Map
av d E" son ~a
Senior Planner
0052k/l
i
r
l
NO.
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND ?LACK FOR FUBLIC HEARINGS
ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DEiCRIBED IN
EXMIBIT "A" ATTACHO HERETO BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND
AUTHW.IZI4G AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH
PUBLIC HEARINGS.
f
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HMay ORDAINS:
SUCTION I.
i
i
On the day of , 1986s at 7:00 o'clock P. M.
{ in the City-7 ouncil Chambers o t e Municipal Building of the
City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public
hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be
heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of
the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein.
On the day of , 19660 at 7:00 o'clock P.M.
in the City--T- onc£1 Chambers of Me Municipal Building of the
City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public
f hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be
heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of
the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
I incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION II.
The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorised
I and directed to cause notice of such public hearings to be
published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the
City and in the territory described in Exhibit "A" not more than
twenty days nor less than tea days prior to the date of such
public hearinggs all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation
Act (Artiale 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes).
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
following its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
RICHARD 0. STEWART~ MAYOK
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DWON,tTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LZ W. FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
j CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
E a
BY: L' '.r1.ls. i.
1
A-3O/COMPI0N-Kn7ON-ZIFF
.
.Y- u~... . ps ..rL.. r f.i(~ `?~L` F .'.i :i s' ^""i.. ~'y~€r ..fine
8=9001 can WAD AMMt"'T100
oeaesbt t2, 0940
?'"D NOM TO A-30
All that Certain treat or pareol of land lying and being situated in the
County at DOnten, state of Tares and being pact at the S. pickett survey,
Abstract 1010100/,, tM the JN. Drittan atvey, Abstract 9tr the J. Rogaca survey,
Abstract . Ro*ecs aevey, Abstract 10091 and the S. Rogers SurV@V,
Abstract 1101 and note partiaulsrly described as tollowa)
Dtarmtoo at a point lying in the intersection of the MOM 10O.N. line of
F.N. 2101 with the south boundary line of Riokoty Cgeek Read, said point also
hot" the Northeast corner of a 22 Seca treat described in Ordinance No.
09-230)
TXBKV Nest along sold present City limits and the south boundary line of said
road a distance of 3426.44 toot to a point tog a comer.
THENCE South 00 42' 50' Nest Ole" said present city limits and east
boundary line of raid Be Rogers MCVOY same bet" the Meat boundary line of
the a. venter survey, Abstract 13110 a distance of 023.20 toot to a point)
TMENCI
said
limit& at 1160.1ufootothe'SoatbwOot c41000 orner of "idYS. Vontoeasur of the war, Panting
and continuing tee a total diatameo of 1031.60 foot to a to eAco nate laut
being the Southeast aorner of said 0. Rogers 0utveY, and the Northeast cornet
of said J. Rogers survey) Abstract 1041)
TttNCS South 010 43' Nest alaag the Last boundary line of said J. A"ers
survey near a fence, a distance of 171360 test to a steel pin at the east
wortheast cognor of tract F-550 .squired by the U.S. Government)
TMENCR North 610 111 Most along said U.S. line 700.0 flat to a concrete
monument)
THSOCE North 370 23' Nest along said U.S. line a distance of 1640.0 tat to
a concrete monument In the North line of said J. Rogers, Abstract 1015, same
being the South boundary line of the D. Mcgora survey, Abstract 1101)
THENCE South 090 67' **at passing at 307.43 feet the Southwest cornet of
said t. Rogers survey, same being the Southeast corner of said J. Rogers
survey, Abstract 1004 continuing aloof tbs South boundary lint of said J.
Rogots survey amd said U.S. line a total distanao of 002.91 feat to a concrete
monument)
TNUM North 190 19' West along said U.S. t."basty line a distance of 1100.0
toot to a aMccote monumentt
TmIM Nortb t0 21' Seat a dlstanso of 1763.71 t"t to point tot s a0rnet
Said point lying in the Notth boundary line ne amid J. Rogers away, Abstract
e-30/COMeM-Sumner-Z1JT/rAGL ONE
h
.
i
=ham ~'{13eepnt r4.2'j +n,~.r,~.}a .w s l - Y`S a _ 'aM'~yT 1 c.•::a
r
Field Notes to A-30
December 12, 1945
Page 2 at 2
10840 saw wing the South boundary
510 said line Of said N. /tttaon wrvey, Abstract
poise also lying in an last and West road kno" see Ntohery Crock C"41
TURC8 South 490 051 Vast 4110" said survey lines in said Bickory Creek
road, a distance of 432.70 feet to a point tot s ooroorl
TMSNCS North$ along the meet boundary line of a 79 Chat'" Bragr4" at 41 to C. B. C " act*
ttso cenvpss by
to Vol. 324 Pogo 332 of the 000 Reset dsbot° °'t'° My 6, 1946 and recorded png 1315.75 feet the Northwest corner said tract*ssomt*ft e be ngY,
a SouO weest st co at
of an 80 won tract eonvtyed by Ted Allison or sl iAa the Southwdead
dated October 140 1943 and rooocded in vol. $01 P" to Arnie /thaw DeCo.
ad by area
of Denton County, Taxes, and ;dntinuing for a totalsdi143 of stance t of 2i31.50rfeet
to a point tot a cornet, same being the Northwest cornet of said Arta brick
Co. tract and to the pCeoont city limit lino as established by Ordinance ro.
77-51
TNSNCi Nncth 840 070 Last along the North boundary line of sold Acrd Brick
tract and said present city limits a distance of 2611.50 feet to a point for
cornet in the loot boundary line of the sold No Britton survey;
TNXK1 North 10 260 West sic" present city lietts, passing at 2287.8 test
the Northeast owner of said N. Britton survey same being the Southeast corner
of the T. Labor survey, Abstract 779, for s total distance of 1607.2 feet to a
point for a corner, acme being the Northeast Cotner of the said T. Labor
survey, said point also lying in the present City limits as established by
ordinance 75-311
TnWKS North 890 3s$ S6" most along said present city limits and the North
boundary line of the Be Pickett surwY, Abstract loll a distance of 1026.65
feet to a point tot a corner, said point lying in the present city Upits as
established by Ordinance No. 65-26;
TNSNCi South 00 010 440 East, along said ,resent city limits, a distance of
1102.64 foot to a point for a corners
TNtNCi North 890 53' Cast along said present city limit line, passing at
1299.88 fret the West R.O,W6 line of F.M. 2141 and continuing for a total
distance of 1349,84 toot to a point for a corner in the preeenL city limits as
by Ordinance No. 45-43 111, sass being the cast R.O.W. line of
P.M. 21411
TNtNCi South 020 170 last along said pcesant city limits, some being the
Cast R.O.W. line of p.m. 2161 a distance of 3202.0 feet t0 a points
TBmNCR South 10 170 Vast along said present city limits, a distance of 960.0
test to a point tot aornerl
Tna" vast slag mid present city limits 9900 toot to plate of beginning and
containing 414.4 awes mere or leas.
00894/1
A.30/COHrm-1UTT0m-ZI F/1PAQ1 TWO
.r
ws'a4'3'1 c+: '`7? ~R.a'~.e,: F'.~ 'S '1Y "".n{',' n..: r:`Tw ..~'ar. ;+r `~'R~"Ti(•.~ ;w~
~ r
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTF.RESTEL PERBONg THAT,
The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
procsedinga to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the
territory described in Exhibit "A", attached ereto and
incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the
City of Denton.
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of
19660 at 7.00 o'clock p. M. in the CLTy r*uncil Chambers o the'
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
lace all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested
in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
A Public Hearing will be hold by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of
1986, at 7:00 o'clock P. N. in the ClEy rouncii ChiAiS;rs o t i
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
place all such persons shall have the riant to appear and be
heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested
in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
Rpm 0-. -37prar-mm
CITY OF DLNTOH, TEXAS
ATTEST:
•
i
A-30/COMPTON-BUTTON-ZIFF
F,. g$ .y.~ch ♦ s: 1 'a~..i spa,, 2~°'° ~.'Y'di' ? ,s' f:' n v ~
.M 2
I
HICKORY Ca"A ROAD ANNEXATION
oeeeai+er !2, 194!
MELD "MME TO A•30
All that certain tract or parcel at land lying WGWf being situated in the
County of Denton, State Of Texas and being part et the t. Pickett survey,
Abstract 1014, the N. &CLtton Survey, Abstract S1, the J. Rogers survey,
Abstract 1044, the J. Rogers survey, Absts4e4 1045, sad the S. Rogers Survey,
Abstract 1101 and got- particularly described as tollowst
894200roo at a point lying in the intersection of the meet R.O.W. line of
P.N. 2141 with the South boundary line of Vickery Crfsk Road, acid point also
being the Northeast Cornet Of a 22 data tract described In Otdinanco No.
05-2341
TNRNCE Nest along Said present City limits and the South boundary line of Said
road a distance of 2420.44 toot to a point for a corner.
TNRNCE South 00 42' SO• West along Said present City limits and test
boundety line of said S. Rogers Survey Sams being the VsSt boundary line of
the 1. Venter survey, Abatraet 1315, a distance of 123.20 feet to a points
THENCE South 10 SS' 220 West along Said City limite
. at 1160.4 feet the Southwest Corner of ;aid S. Venterasurvey$ Abstract a1315
and continuing for a total distance of 1434.69 feet to a fence corner, Same
being the Southeast 009009 Of Said E. Rogers Survey, and the Northeast corner
of Said J. Rogers survey, Abstract 10151
TMINCI
J. loq*ts
survey nearha0tseco, aedistanoa ofe17Eas boundary 41tf feet to a tin*
pin said
the cast
Northeast corner of tract t-554 acquired by the U.S. Covernmentr
THENCE North 510 14' Vast along "Id U44. line 700.0 feet to a concrete
monuments
THENCE North 370 23' West along said U.S. Iino a distance of 1610.0 feet to
a concrete monument in the North line Of said J. Rogers, Abstract 1065, same
being the South boundary line of the R. Rogers survey, Abstract 1101;
THENCE South 490 57' West passiaj at 367.8S feet the southwest cornet of
said S. Rogers autvey, Same bel,iq the Southeast Corner of said J. Rogers
auryay, Abstract 1014 continuin ,%.lonq the South boundary line of said J.
Rogers Survey and Said O.S. Tina, a vital distance of 112.95 test to a concrete
monumentl
TEENCR North 290 SS' West along said U.S. boundary line a distance of 1100.0
feet to a Concrete meneaalatl
THENCE North 10 all East a distance of 1755.74 toot to point Not a corner
Said point lying in the north boundary line of sail J. Rogers survey, Abstract
30/C0WM-8 TTTON-ZItF/PArW ONE
yr€ „ " s
s r r,, 1, F
?told Notes to A-30
December 12, 1f1S
page 2 of 2
1016, Ad point the ySouth j bouMary
S1 It" of said No Brletom atltYBy, Abstract
, saint also 1yf11g in an 1442 and Most road known as stakary Cr904 roads
T1110Ct south if° 050 teat along acid survey lines in Said Nickoty crook
road, a distance at 632,70 feet to a point for a Corners
TN1NCS North, along the Mast boundary line at a i9 acre tract Conveyed by
Charles soagra+: At sl to c.
in
i Val. s. Compton by deed dated Nay 6:. 1166 and recorded at
3.7$ 326 Pago 332 of the orne Bgold t of Denton county, Texas, passing at
I3315 last the Northw*h corner said ra0e, acne being iouthvest corner the
of an 80 sera tract conveyed by Ted Allison at al, to Acme Briet Co. by deed
of t0 ntonCCounty# Texa1963 ccoontinuing tVol, ot agtotaledistame of 22$J1.30 Net
to a point for a corner, salve being the Northwest corner of said Acme brick
Co, tract and in the present city limit line a 48tablisMd by Ordinance No.
77-SS .
TH1MC1 Moreh 880 07' last along the North boundary line of said Acme brick
tract and said present city limits a distance at 2631.50 feat to a point for
corner In the last boundary line of the said No Britton surveys
ThRNC1 North 10 26' West along present city limits,
the ncthaast corner of said N. Britton Survey "me bepassing .a
t" tat 22thea testst of the Labor survey, Abstract 779, tot a tal distaaca of 2607.2 test ~toa
point fo,, a corner, saoo being the Northeast corner Of the old T. Labor
survey, P.sid point 4180 lying In the present city limits as established by
ordinance 75-311
TNCNC2 North 990 34' !60 last along said present city limits and the north
boundary line of the s. Pickett survey, Abstract 1010 a distance of 1026.65
feet to a point far 4 Corner, said point lying In the present city limits as
established by Ordinance No. M-211
THINCC South 00 Olp 660 Last, along said present city limits, a distinct or
1102.61 toot to s point for a corners
TH1NC1 North 990 53' last along acid present city limit line, passing at
1299,11 Net the West R.OoM, 111;4 of P.M. 2181 ind continuing for a total
distance of 1,189.81 feet to a point for a corner In the present ;ity limits as
established by Ordinance Woo 6l-13 ,!2, same being the rase R.O.W. line of
P.M. 21111
TH1MC1 South 020 17' fast along said present city limits, acme being the
last R.O.W, lino of ?,M. 2111 a distance of 320260 feet to a points
THINCS South 10 17' Cast along said present city Italtap a distance of 960.0
feet to a point for Cotner,
TN9*Ci Most along said present city limits 95.0 fast to place of beginning and
containing 611,6 oarea more or loss.
001le/I
l
A-30/COMMN-AUTTON-ZTFF/PAG2 TWO
f
dop
Com d4
memo
~ y + e one Lone w
IP Ayon ;d.; . ...1
Z , • . * binsan
I d,
t ~I #
A~-3
h •ek . ~ ::~owlin
'Al fP
{ C . r
06
cn °
Fib . ~ ~ •
; • .
• s • M I c' k of
-+III~III.. . r q 4-.-_ ~ay °1 urn, -
I
I
CrrV 0f DtXT0N, r!'XAi MUNICIPAL BUILDING I DENTON, TEXAS ?#Rol i rELEVHONE (pr7)eee-tsor
Oltk» of the ary Manaerar
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Members of the City C0Lncil
FROM: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
DATE: January 17, 1986
SUBJECT: Back-up Information for Item 9H.
We are trying to make changes to all pertinent policies that
would be affected by allowing comp. time to Civil Service
employees. At this time there are still some questions as to
. the appropriate legal forms that this must take. You will
either be receiving back-up material Monday or we will pull the
item from the agenda.
Rick ve a
Acting City Manager
761M
i
r-
i:^!t>~:st
/00
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, Ensearch Corporation desires to obtain an easement
to construct and maintain pipelines on the real property of Flow
Memorial Hospital; and
WHEREAS, the Denton County-City of Denton, Texaa Hospital
Board (Flow Memorial Hospitawas created and operates under
the provisions of Article 44941-1 V.A.T.S.; and
WHEREAS, said statute requires that the City of Denton and
that County of Denton approve by resolution any conveyance of
t.4a,. property by the Hospital Board; NOW, THbREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONg TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton hereby authorises
the Denton County-City of Denton, Texas Hospital Board to execute
an easement to Ensearch Corporation for the purpose of
constructing and maintaining pipelines and >ppurt*nancsx, as
described in that easement attached hereto.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
RICHARD 0, bT ARTs MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,0TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
%ITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
.MaeV:_°`~.t'+"..r=rvt^
fete Mo. to
EASEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS f
COUNTY OF DENTON KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTSs
f
That for and in consideration of Ten and No/W Dollars (S10.0o) and other
good and valuable consideration to the ur+dersigned, (herein styled GRANTOR,
whether one or more) paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the said
GRANTOR does hereby GRANT, SELL and CONVEY unto ENSERCH CORPOR.
ATION (c/o Lone Star Gas Cornpany, 301 South Harwood Street, Dallas, Texas
73201), a corporation (herein styled GRANTEE), Its successors and assigns, a right
of way and easement ten feet (101) In width to construct, inspect, maintain,
repalr, operate, replace, relocate, change the size of, all within the easement
herein described, and remove at will, in whole or in part, pipelines and
appurtenances thereto, cathodic protection equipment and aerial markers over and
through the following described land situated In the State of Texas, County of
Denton, to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated In the City of Denton
and County of Denton, State of Texas, Part of the R. Beaumont
Survey, Abstract No, 31, being
more fully described in deed from Gerald Stockard, County Judge of Denton
County, et al, to The City of Denton, a Municipal Corporation and The County
of Denton, Texas, a political and subdivision of the State of Texas, recorded In
Volume 331, Page 232, Deed Records of said county, to which reference is made
for further description..
The right of way and easement herein conveyed shall be ten feet (101) as
shown on the Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a put hereof.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto said GRANTEE, Its successors and assign;,
so long as such fines, appurtenances and related facilities thereto shall be
malntalrned, with Ingress to and egress from the pretr,.ws across thwt adjacent
lands of GRANTOR, for the purpose of this grant. GRANTOR "I not
construct or permit to be constructed any permanent structure upon the
easement strip herein conveyed which would interfere with the exercise of
GRANTEE'S rights and GRANTOR further agrees rot to change the grade,
remove dirt from the surface of thou easement or Impound water over the
easement without prior approval of GRANTEE.
GRANTEE hereby agrees to bury all pipe to a sufficient depth to as not
to Interfere with cWti:ration of soil and to pay any damages which may arise to
=i
t y.
- ~ _ _ jam, Y.
~'rn r.~'a~,q'~.r +aq~v!ts T?`~" v *..:~%?°"{i . '''T'i • ,~-.d.~ >•r rf ..~ur *s w ~+s~ss ~~2s ~ ,
i+
growing crops and fences from the eonerruetion, mainteaaaee sad operation
of pipelines and related facilities constructed under the terms of this
grant. The consideration received for this easement includes payment
for the normal iamages caused by the initial construction of d.s pipeline
and its appurtenances.
The consideration first above recited as being paid to GRANTOR b,t
GRANTEE is in full satisfaction of every right hereby granted. All coven-
ants and agreements herein contained shall extend to end be binding upon
the respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of
the parties hereto and is further assignable in vhole or in part.
It Is hereby understood that the party saciwing this grant in behalf
of GRANTEE is without authority to make any covenant or agreement not
herein expressed.
WITNESS THE EXECUTION HERSOP, on this the day of ,
A. D. 1986,
DENTON COUNTY-CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
HOSPITAL BOARD
BY;
s
_ .Zr,.
F:ar `.`S'i "3.ltsr{. _ s m l syi'~ 'y. !`°'s'.. ° c•~ +.''y . .r 14W,
TM STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DCNTON r
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for
the State of Texa■, on this day personally appeared
Chair*sn of the Denton County-City of
Denton, Texas Hospital board, own to sN to be the person whose new
Is subscribed to the foregoing instrutaant, and acknowledged to w that
he executed the sane for the purposes and consideration therein expressed,
in the capacity therein stated, and ■r the act and deed of said corporation.
GIVEN UNDER MY NAND AND SEAL OF OPFICE, on this the day of
1486.
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS
MY COMMISSION EXPIRESs
i )'tl 4. j
t
.s
.
EXHIBIT "A00'
:1 E:.
CA~'~ESS M~r"/Qe%/G
J~ASP/T.~L
SCE'/~T//. E SMA
W
y
s
FLtJd✓ MG''MOk'/r✓G NLtSP/TAG
/9/O S'Ca°~E S'T,E'EET
eS/7i Scf7 - Jga /
oENr N MUM,
TF~r.9.s
ds GE-/OP
M
am"L
L
l NTON, TE.t.~5
~w► w.
Alm I r ssre/ ON swa
di f 9d
JCR- - M- 14% 66
rk .
-W . f ~t t'
/LJ' I j
t
I
R E S 0_L_tl_T 10 N
i
WHEREAS, it is necessary for tho Council of the City of
j Denton to authorize the submission of an application to the
Texan Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for a
Juvenile Police Officer to augment the City's Juvenile Law
Enforcement Program; and
r
WIVARAS, A. acle 4413 (32a) V.T.C.S. was amended to enable
the Criminal Justice Division oI the State of Texan to allocate
grants and administer criminal justice programs on a statewide
level; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such
funds and desires to promote the pubiid safety and well-being of
its citizens through increasing the effectiveeess of the Denton
Police Department is its law enforcement relating to juveniles;
NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON0 TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council of tla City of Denton, Texas,
certifies that the City in eligible to receive a funding
allocation from the Texas Crimin^1 Justice Division for a
Juvenile Police Officer to augment the City's Juvenile Law
Enforcement Program and hereby authorizes the staff to submit an
application for such funds.
SECTION I1..
That the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City
Manager, or his designs*, to represent and act on behalf of the
City of Denton in working with the Criminal Justice Division in
regard to such grant application.
SECTION III.
That a copy of this Resolution shall be 'forwarded to the
Texas Criminal Justice Division and the North Texas Central
Council of Governments.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day.of 9Ab.'
i
RICHARD 0. STEWOrl M
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CMUMME ALLEN,
CITY SIMMMM
CITY OF DENTON,TUO.
k' APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAM! DkAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: 7' , y
~,>C
r .
R E S 0 T 1 0 0--
i
W. EREAS, Mr. Melvin Gougs, member of the Board of Directors
of the North Texas Higher Education Authority, Inc., Place 6,
resigned effective September 30, 1985; and
North Texas Higher January ion 19860 Author ty, board Inc. t noaLnated DirectorsDrof Jithe
m
B. Pearson to Place 6 on the Board, NOW, THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI'.'.'Y OF DENTON, THAT:
k SECTION I.
The Council hereby approves said nomination and appoints Dr.
Jia B. Pearson to Place 6 on the Board of Directors of the North
Texas Higher Education Authority, Inc. for the October 1, 1985
through eptember 300 1987 term.
l
SECTION II.
This Resolution shall become effective Irom and after its
date of passage.
IE PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of December, 1986.
RICHARD U.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLENj CITY SECRETARY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
DEBRA ADAMI DFAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
i
'
swam
CM COMIL IMPON JUM?
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Coun..il
FROMs Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION OF 110.5255 ACRES LOCAT:-) AT
KINGS ROY AND PROPOSED LOOP 2881 SOUTH OF OAK BEND ESTATES, AND
SOUTH OF SILYERDOME ROAD FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER TO
BEGIN THE ANNEXATION PROCESS (A-33)
RECOMMENDATION:
A Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation will be forwarded
at a later date if City Council directs staff to initiate the
annexation process.
SUMMARY:
This is a voluntary request for annexation submitted by Teasley Road
Associates. The total area of request is 110.5255 acres separated
into two parcels and located along Kings Row, Silverdome Road, pro-
posed Loop 288, and an extension of Kings Row which turns northward
to form a connection with Hartlee Field Road. The purpose of the
annexation is to provide for zoning and delivery of City sarvices.
The current conceptual land use plan exhibits 128 lots of siitle
family (SF-7) land use, 3.8 sores of commercial along propos--d Loop
288, 9.6 acres of multi-family and a 10 acre school site. Planned
development (PD) zoning is anticipated if annexation is approved.
The nearest existing city limit line begins approximately 400 feet
south and west of the subject property along the fringe of the
Kingston Trace Subdivision.
BACKGROUND:
Not applicable
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
No existing housing or population is located within the area of
request. The Oak Bend Estates Subdivision abuts this tract to the
north and approximately two to four residents are surrounded by the
subject site to the eaat along the unnamed county road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
R Q lly s Prepared by: 'Rick 3fthla
1 Z & Acting City Manager
`David Ellison wY
Senior Planner
App Nxeyk~xn=_
e -
Director of Planning
and De"lops snt 15159
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Discussion of request for annexation of 110.5255
acres located at Kings Row and proposed Loop 288,
south of Oak Bend Estates, acid south of
Silverdome Road for the purpose of dfiterminingg
whether to begin the annexation process (A-33).
SUMMARY: This is a voluntary request for annexation
submitted by Teasley Road Associates. The
petitioners are requesting annexation and
zoning to insure aeliver of City services.
A conceptual land use plan is attached showing
128 lots of single family (SF-7) land use, 3.8
acres of commercial along proposed Loop 288,
9.6 acres of multi-family, and a 10 acre school
site. Planned development (PD) zoning will most
likely be requested if annexation is approved.
This site begins adjacent and south of existing
residential development in the Oak Bend Estates
Subdivision and additional residential housing
is surrounded by the site to the east. The
nearest existing city limit line begins
approximately 400 feet south and west of the
southwestern edge of the subject tract (along
the fringe of the Kingston Trace Subdivision).
The southwestern edge of the subject part.el
abuts proposed Loop 288 right-of-way.
The property consists of two parcels separated
by Kings Row, Silverdome Road, and an unnamed
county road that branches off Kings Row to the
north to form a connection with Hartlee Field
Road, Hartlee Field Road is approximately 3/4
to 1 mile north of the area of request.
There are no existing structures or population
located within the proposed area of annexation.
A resident of Oak Bend Estates contacted staff
to advise that the majority of the property
owners are not in favor of annexation of their
subdivision.
=j
City Council Back-up Summary
January 21, 2986
Page 2
ACTION REQUIRED: Determine whether to begin the annexation
process.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to annex area of request only
2. Direct staff to annex area of request: and
additional property
3. Deny request for annexation
4. Table for future consideration
ATTACHMENTS: 1, Map
2, Conceptual land use plan
3. Copy of petition for annexation
a~"v3T~Sf~'f'son
Senior Planner
1S13a
P,.,
~ ~ !Nora h d: ~Q
tee, ~ ~ , ~ ` , ' • ~ m .
1
I • Bottom.Circl• W
Rd$
HARTLEE
•Hart104 lpield Ids _
4 18
ac OF EtT;QIJFST f ~ f •
, f4Q Oak Fiend
f
' e*Rd ~p
Kf 426 Row or.
110
on i
' inge
.G Tre p C
L 380 boom
vow
37
w ~Ap
MOW
ie ty
A rj.n
i uwtowlr
OAK MEND EBTATEB
I,r \
, Uwt ON10 , Y • • ~ • i ~
Y' r W '
r.
M MI
r J
M #
Y
i _ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ 10.0 A!t'M ~ ~ I
w t
fCN004 NT6 1 i, uwrowrgi
M
S1 I -v r 14 "m )~_j
•
L7
P. 9.4 d 6
/ r!r + tWtt'1 • IYNW • r r r t
1
ebb,
Romeo A r l,At b/N N/ A r r ,
• r ~r r r~ 'Y f~` I
MAW-- s
Q
'KINGOTON
TAAO! I t uwtoNfo r
sown sp-r f~ / } I , I
rC}} l,Ow[r A
I UNtONED~ - ~
r I, { tij
1 59acres
LOOP 288 ~ KINGS P()1V
PSTITION
FOR n
AMXATION
TO THI PLANNING AND ZONING COlMXSStON
AND
CITY COUNCIL
or
THN CITY OF DRNTON, TNXA8
The undersigned do*s hereby petition for annexation of 11 0 5255
at tt i n9' s now z unnnimBd Loon 288 r - r gyres located
in the ♦xtraterri'orial jurisdiction
of the City of Denton, Texas, The property is more partioularly described in
the attached survey description and shown on the attached mn,'. The undersigned
also certifies that the following required information conav:ning the lr.nd and
its inhabitants is reasonably accurate and asmumos responsibtlity for
completion of said information prior to scheduled action on the request bW the
City of Denton.
1. Is petition being initiated by owner(s) or majority of registered voters in
area of request? Yea X No If no, what is the statue
of the applicant?
2. How many dwelling units are located within the area requested for
annexation? None
3. How many businesses or nonresidential land uses are located within the area
of the request? None Please provide a general description of theme
land uses inoluding the name(s) of businesses, if known
t. Does area of request include any territory within the city limits or extra-
territorial jurisdiction of another city?' Yes - No X
5. Satimated population of the area of request. None Adults
Children Number of registered voters?
6. At the time of this petition, have any other annexation procedures been
initiated for all or any part of the area requested in this petition?
Yes No ___X If yea, please explain the procedures begun
and their status.
7. Does a water supply district lie within the boundaries of the area proposed
for annexation? Yes No X
8. What zoning, if any, other than agricultural (A is bring requested under
separate petition? to be proposed separately
Now much of territory proposed for annexation is included in zonkng
petition? all 110.5255 acres
Petition for Annexation
Pap Two
9. What is the purpose of annexation? Subject property is to be
d•yeloaed and will require services from City o Denton or
~awer.~water. electricity,etc.
10, Planned land use (if zoning is being requested);
Proposed Unit
Category g Total Per Acre And/or
Proposed AQre Sduare Footage
a, Single family detached
b. Single family attached (townhouses,
cluster, etc.) _
o. Attached patio/garden/zero lot line
4. Duplex
e. multi-family Zoninq to be proposed separately
f. Office
g. Neighborhood, service
h. General Retail
1. Commercial
J, light industrial
k. Heavy Industrial
Proposed use(s) if specific use permit or planned 4evelopftnt (PD) being
requested.
1 Have petitioner(s) familiarized themselves with the official annexation
policy, land use policies, and the standard municipal service plan of the
City of Denton? Yes _ X No
Name of owner(s) d Associates Telephone (817 } 383-1520
signature(s) Date November 15, 1985
Address(* P_ o
panton. Texas 76202
If petitioner is not the owner of the property: Status
Petitioner
Name(s) Telephone ( )
Signature(s) Date
Address(se)
' Pieid Notes and Location Map for area proposed for annexation must be
submitted along with completed petition before process begins.
0862)
OM: 01/21/66
giTY COUNCIL RRPM 11000
To: Mayor and Membrrs of the City Council
FROM; Rick Svehlat Acting City Manager
SUBJECTI DISCUSSION OF PETITION OF BRLI,AIRt WEST PARTNERS FOR ANNEXATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 102.49 ACRES BEGINNING ADJACENT AND NORTH OF JIM
CHRISTAL ROAD, SOUTH OF O.S. HIGHWAY 38OW9 APPROXIMATELY 1/2 MILE
BAST OF %GAN ROAD AND 3/4 MILE MIST OF UNDERWOOD ROAD FOR THE
PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER TO BEGIN THE ANNEXATION PROCESS
(A-34).
R$CQMNDATION:
A Planning and Zoning Commiesion recommendation will be forwarded at
a later date if the City Council directs staff to initiate the
annexation process.
may:
This is a voluntary request for annexation and light indus`rtal
zoning. No specific plans have been revealed to date. The site is
located north of existing city limits along the south side of Jim
Christal Road approximately 3/4 to I mile west of the Municipal
Airport. An annexation strip also exists north of the tract along
Highway 38OW.
BAC6GROUND:
Not applicable
PROQRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUP AFFECTED:
No existing housing structures or population are included in the
area of request.
FISCAL TRACT:
Undetermined
aoe fly 16 bmi :
Rick vehla
Prepared by: Acting City Manager
David 911 tson A-e"
Senior Planner
Appr ed•
Jeff ftr
Director of Planning
and Developmat
1sx6sia S r}
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Discussion of Petition of Bellaire West Partners
for annexation of approximately 102,49 acres
beginning adjacent and north of Jim Christal
Road, south of U.S. Highway 38014, approximately
1/2 mile east of Egan Road and 3/4 mile west of
Underwood Road for the purpose of determining
whether to begin the annexation process (A-34).
SUMMARY: This is a voluntary request with an accompanying
petition for light industrial (LI) zoning. The
tract 14 located approximately 3/4 to 1 mile
west of the Municipal Airport, The owners have
not submitted any information regarding specific
plans for the site.
The newest existing city limits begin south of
the site along Jim Christal Road and north along
Highway 380W. No existing structures or
population are included in the area of request.
Jim Christal Road is a county maintained road.
Perimeter •V,-',street paving will be required
along the entire width of the tract if developed
regardless of the result of the annexation
request, Some flood plain area exists within
the site. Based on present conditions, water
service would have to be extended approximately
6,000 feet north and 2,000 feet west,
Information on sewer availability is not clear
at this time.
ACTION REQUIRED: Determine whether to begin the annexation process
ALTERNATIVES: 1, Direct staff to begin process for area of
request only
2. Direct staff to annex area of request and
surrounding property
3, Deny request
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Map
2. Copy of annexation petition
David E son 4.9!-.
Senior Planner
1618g/l
FAS
'i
• a
` O A004104 T O
(PVT1!'
1 ~aek c
• a t \
:9 M
~ FAP ~ a 'I~,4.• " C ~ ~ a
* rliver
1.4
. v , y`. J..
Atli
CNTON
k~,WUNI C !PA L(
;WA
. 1
To m •C 1a° ~StS
U A J~ fir- 1
.
SpOn •sidQ' RG ~
kd.
%,k
PlTITION
POR
ANUZZATION Q .
TO THN PLANNING AND ZONING COlMMION
AND
CITY COUNCIL
or
THt CITY Of DNNTON, TKXAS
The undersigned does hereby petition for annexation of JQ?. 49 acres located
at Jim Ch riRtal Road in the extraterritorial jurisdiction
of the city of Denton, Texas. The property is more particularly described in
the attached survey description and shown on the attached slap. The undersigned
also certifies that the following required information concerning the land and
its inhabitants is reasonably accurate and assume responsibility for
oosspletion of said information prior to scheduled action on the request by the
City of Denton.
1. is petition being initiated by owner(s) or majority of registered voters in
area of request? Yes X No If no, what is the status
of the applicant?
2. How many dwel~Ing units are located within the area requested for
annexation? hone
3. How many businesses or nonresidential land uses are located within the area
of the request? one Please provide a general description of these
. land uses including the nbme(s) of businesses, it known
4. Does area of request include any territory within the city limits or extra-
territorial jurisdiction of another city? Yes No X
5. Betimated population of the area of request. Nnna Adults
Children Number of registered voters?
6. At the time of this petition, have any other annexation procedures been
initiated for all or any part of the area requested in this petition?
Yes No X If yes, please explain the procedures begun
and their status.
7. Does a water sttpply district lie within the boundaries of the area proposed
for annexation? Yes No
8. What zoning, it any, other than agricultural (A), is being requested under
separate petition? I.Jghf, _rndlIatL1l &I
How much of territory proposed for annexation to included in zoning
petition? A)1
Petition for Annexation
Page TWO
9, What is the purpose of annexation? Extension of utilities and
ggry ces u the the property-ma,, _ be d evelope
10, Planned land use (if zoning is being requested);
Proposed Univ
Category & Total Per Aare And/Or
Upgos AUAM Square Footage
a. Single family detached
b. Single Contly attached (townhouses,
cluster, eta,)
a. Attached patio/garden/zero lot line
d. Duplex
e. [`Multi-family
f. Office
g. Neighborhood service
h. General Retail
i. Commercial
J. light industrial 2. 1q '
k. Heavy Industrial
Proposed use(s) if specific use permit or planned development (PD) being
requested. NQne
11. Have petitioner(s) familiarized themselves with the official annexation
policy, land use polloioe, and the standard municipal service plan of the
City of Denton? Yes No
Name of Owner(s) Bellgire West Partners Telephone (81'7}555-1104
Signature(s) Date
Address(ee) 420 S. Carroll Ste. 0
Denton TX .76201
If petitioner is not the owner of the property: Status
Petitioner
Name(s) Telephone ( )
Signature(s) Date
Address(es)
1
" Field Notes and Location Map fer area proposed for annexation must be
submitted along with completed petition before process begins,
0862)