HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-03-1986
AC~~ Nd~
0 r040 lu
Lei: cbu to
7:Sv ox 3.19 8!~
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
June 3, 1986
Work Session of t4ho City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
June 3, 1986, at 5:s0 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
1. Hold a discussion on the City of Denton's position
regarding financial responsibility for indigent health
care.
2. Hold a discussion and consider approval of request for
proposal for independent auditing services.
3. Receive a report on ,roposal from Denton County Tax
Appraisal District regarding tax collection for the
City of Denton.
4, Hold a discussion on calendar of available dates for
follow-up meetings on City Council retreat goals and
objectives.
51 Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S. (see item #11)
is. Real Estate Under 'Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17
V.A.T,S. (see item 012)
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A,T.S. (see item #13)
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
June 3, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of May 2U, 1986.
2. Consider approval of a resolution in appreciation of
Thomas Chastain.
31 Consider presentation of awards for beautification
effort to the City.
4. Consider presentation of the proposed budget for Flow
Memorial Hospital.
City of Lennon City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Two
5. Consider approval of Kappa Sigma Fraternity holding a
''barbecque and reception at 2026 west Oak on June 21,
1986 dtrom 6:30 p.m, until 11:00 p.m. and allowing tin
outside loudspeaker to be used.
6. Appearance by Mr. Chris Caudle regarding drainage
problems on Old Lee Court.
t-
7. Public Hearings:
A. S-167. Petition of the Cumberland Presbyterian
F LTi Tc7ren's Home requesting an amendment to
Specific Use Permit (5-167). The property is
located at the southwest corner of Bernard and
C' Greenlee streets and is further described as 1304
Bernard Street, Lot 1, Block 1, of the Cumberland
Presbyterian Children's Home Addition for a total
of 17.327 acres. If the request is approved the
amendment will allow the construction of an
activities building that is not included on the
original site plan, (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
an amendment to specific use permit (S-167).
B. Z-17U9, Petition of Burke Engineering,
representing Tri-Steel Structures, requesting a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the office (0) classification.
The tract is five (5) acres of land situated west
of and abutting Masch Branch Road and north of U.
S. Highway 380 and more fully described as lot 1,
block 1, Tri-Steel Headquarters Addition. If the
zoning change is approved, the property may be
utilized for any land use permitted in the office
(U) classification by the City of Denton Zoning
Ordinance, (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
a change in zoning on a five (5) acre tract
of land situated west of and abutting Masch
Branch Road and north of U. S. Highway 380.
C, Z-1798. Petition of Ana Rocco Pena requesting an
amendment to an existing 14.057 acre planned
development located on the east side of Riney
Road adjacent and south of U,S, Highway 77 and
north of Windsor Drive at a point approximately
220 feet east of the intersection of Riney Road
and Windsor Drive. The current planned
development permits the development of thirty one
(31) single family dwellings and one retirement/
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Three
recovery center. The proposed amendment would permit
the development of a church on a 5.8 acre portion of
the single family site. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance approvin an
amendment to an existing 14.057 acre planned
development located on the east side of
Riney Road adjacent and south of U.S.
Highway 77 and north of Windsor Drive.
8. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 9.A and 9.B). This listing is
provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to
discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids:
1. Bid 0 9607 - CIP Utilities/State School
waterline
2. Bid #9621 - Lease of scraper
B. Plats and Replats:
1. Approval of final replat of Blocks 8 and 9
of the Hillside Addition; Lots 1, 21 7, and
8, block 4, of the G. M. Greenlee Addition;
and all of Block 1 and part of Blocks 2, 4,
and 5 of the Hinson and Vanden's Addition
(Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Home
Addition). Me Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
2. LApproval ondonderry oAddition, preliminary y1, plat 1, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Four
3. Approval of preliminary plat of the Whitney
Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of preliminary plat of the South
Denton Industrial Park Addition, Lot 1,
Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
C. Final Payment:
1. Approval of the final payment to Jo Storer
for the Hobson Lane/ 377 waterline oversize
participation agreement in the amount of
$50,578.70. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
9. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan instituting annexation of approximately
66.42 acres situated in the Moreau Forrest
Survey, Abstract 417, and beginning adjacent and
east of Geesling Road, south of U.S. Highway 380
Past, and west of Trinity Road. (A•36)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
amendment of planned development (PD-12) on an
approximately 78 acre tract located on the west
side of Interstate 35h approximately 2,SOO feet
south of State School Road, (Z-1705)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting the
conveyance of deed from the trust for public land
of 16.0455 acres of land located in the H. Carter
survey, Abstract No. 2810 City and County of
Denton, Texas. (The Parks and Recreation Board
recommends approval.)
F. Consider ado}~tion of an ordinance providing for
one-way traffic from south to north on the oast
frontage road of Interstate Highway 35 between
Highway 380 and Highway 77, and for one-way
traffic from north to south on the west frontage
pia
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page give
road of Interstate highway 35 between 380 and
F.M. 1173; providing for a penalty in the maximum
amount of 200.00 for violations thereof. (The
Citizens traffic Safety Support Commission
recommends approval.)
.G. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting the
dedication by plat of a drainage easement from
Ali A1-Khafaji.
10. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily
closing Pembrooke and Lynhurst Streets at the
intersection of Pennsylvania and Longridge on
July 12, 1986 from the hours of 4:00 p.m. until
10:0U p.m. for the purpose of having a
neighborhood block party.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
Mayor to approve requests made through the County
Commissioners Court for extension of services and
requests for the naming of streets in the
extra territorial jursidiction of the City of
Denton.
C. Consider approval of a resolution agreeing to
contribute a proportional share of the cost of
updating the Greater Dallas Mobility Study.
D. Consider approval of a resolution changing the
date of the regular City Council meeting ofg June
17 to June 10, 1986.
11. (receive a report and discuss the status of the lease
agreement between the City of Denton and Maverick
Aircraft, Inc.
12. Receive a report on the status of the proposed asset
transfer of Flow Memorial Hospital,
13. Consider approval of an appointment to the North
Central Texas Council o[ Governments's Executive Baard
of a regional citizen rei.osentative.
14. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
15. New business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Six
16. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
C. Personnel/board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
17, official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. board Appointments
C E R T I F I C A T E
1 certify thal. the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of De ton, Texas,
on the s day of - , 1986 at 4`9 o' clock
(a.m.}
U111 bhL;KhLAKT
2211C
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
June 3, 1986
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
June 3, 1986, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
1. Hold a discussion on the City of Denton's position
regarding financial responsibility for indigent health
care.
2. Hold a discussion and consider approval of request for
proposal for independent auditing services.
3. Receive a report on proposal from Denton Cuunty Tax
Appraisal District regarding tax collection for the
City of Denton.
4. Hold a discussion on calendar of available dates for
follow-up meetings on City Council retreat goals and
objectives.
S. Executive Session:
A. Legal, ;clatters Under Sec, 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S. (see item #11)
8. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S. (see item #12)
C. Personnel/hoard Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. (see item #13)
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
June 3, 1986, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7: 00 p. at.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of May 201 1986.
2. Consider approval of a resolution in appreciation of
Thomas Chastain,
3. Consider presentation of awards for beautification
effort to the City.
4, Consider presentation of the proposed budget for Flow
Memorial Hospital,
xis
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Two
5. Consider approval of Kappa Sigma Fraternity holding a
bxrbeque and reception at 2026 West Oak on June 21,
1986 from 6:30,m, until 11:00 p.m. and allowing an
outside loudspeaker to be used.
6. Appearance by Mr. Chris Caudle regarding drainage
problems on Old Lee Court,
7. Public hearings:
A, S-167. Petition o.: the Cumberland Presbyterian
Children's Home requesting an amendment to
Specific Use Permit (5-167). The property is
located at the southwest corner of Bernard and
Greenlee streets and is further described as 1304
Bernard Street, Lot 1, Block 1, of the Cumberland
Presbyterian Children's Home Addition for a total
of 17.327 acres. If the request is approved the
amendment will allow the constructior of an
activities building that is not included on the
original site plan. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
an amendment to specific use permit (S-167).
B. Z-17U9. Petition of Burke Engineering,
representing Tri-Steel Structures, requesting a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the office (0) classification.
The tract is five (5) acres of land situated west
of and abutting Masch Branch Road and north of U.
S. Highway 380 and more fully described as lot 1,
block 1, Tri-Steel Headquarters Addition. If the
zoning change is approved, the property may be
utilized for any land use permitted in the office
(U) classification by the City of Denton Zoning
Ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
a change in zoning on a five (5) acre tract
of land situated west of and abutting Masch
Branch Road and north of U. S. Highway 380.
Ca Z-1798. Petition of Ana Rocco Pena requesting an
am n ment to an existing 14.057 acre planned
development located on the east side of Riney
Road adjacent and south of U.S. Highway 77 and
north o Windsoir Drive at a point approximately
220 feet east of the intersection of Riney Road
and Windsoir Drive. The current planned
development permits the development of thirty one
(31) single family dwellings and one retirement/
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Three
recovery center. The proposed amendment would permit
the development of a church on a 5.8 acre portion of
the single family site. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance approving an
amendment to an existing 14.057 acre planned
development located on the east side of
Riney Road adjacent and south of U.S.
Highway 77 and north of Windsor Drive.
8. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended 'by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment. under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-v- information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 9.A and 9.B). This listing is
provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to
discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids:
1. Bid # 9607 - C1P Utilities/State School
waterline
2. Bid #9621 - Lease of scraper
B. Plats and Replats:
1. Approval of final replat of Blocks 8 and 9
of the Hillside Addition; Lots 1, 20 7, and
8, Block 4, of the G. M. Greenlee Addition;
and all of Block 1 and part of Blo,.-ks 2, N,
and 5 of the Hinson and Vanden's Addition
(Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Home
Addition). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
2. Approval of preliminary plat of the
Londonderry Addition, Lot 1, Bloc,% 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Four
30 Approval of preliminary plat of the Whitney
Paris Addition. (The Piannin and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.1
4. Approval of preliminary plat c` the South
Denton Industrial Park Addition, Lot 1,
Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
C. Final Payment:
1. Approval of the final payment to Jo Storer
for tho Hobson Lane/ 377 waterline oversize
participation agreement in the amount of
$500578.70. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
9. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
B, Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
C, Consider adoption of ai, ordinance and service
plan instituting annexation of approximately
66.42 acres situated in the Moreau Forrest
Survey, Abstract 417, and beginning adjacent and
east of Geesling Road, south of U.S. Highway 380
Bast, and'west of 't'rinity Road. (A-36)
D, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
amendment of planned development (PD-12) on an
approximately 78 acre tract located on the west
side of Interstate 35k approximately 2,500 feet
south of State School Road. (Z-1705)
1S, Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting the
conveyance of deed from the trust for public land
of 16.0455 acres of land located in the H. Carter
Survey, Abstract No. 281, City and County of
Denton, Texas. (The Parks and Recreation Board
recommends approval.)
F. Consider ado tion of an ordinance providing for
one-way traffic from south to north on the east
frontage road of Interstate Highway 35 between
Highway 380 and Highway 77, and for one-way
traffic from north to south on the west frontage
y
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Five
road of Interstate Highway 3S between 380 and
F.M. 1173; providing for a pcaalty in the maximum
amount of $200.00 for violations thereof. (The
Citizens Traffic safety Support Commission
recommends approval.)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting the
dedication by plat of a drainage easement from
Ali Al-IKhafaji.
10. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily
closing Pembrooke and Lynhurst Streets at the
intersection of Pennsylvania and Longridge on
July 12, 1986 from the hours of 4:00 p.m. until
10:00 P.M. for the purpose of having a
neighborhood block party.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
Mayor to approve requests made through the County
Commissioners Court for extension of services and
requests for the naming of streets in the
extra-territorial jursidiction of the City of
Denton.
C. Consider approval of a resolution agreeing to
contribute a proportional share of the cost of
updating the Greater Dallas Mobility Study.
D. Consider approval of a resolution changing the
date of the regular City Council meeting of June
17 to June 10, 1986.
I1. Receive a report and discuss the status of the lease
agreement between the City of Denton and Maverick
Aircraft, inc.
12. Receive a report on the status of the proposed asset
transfer of Flow Memorial Hospital.
13. Consider approval of an appointment to the North
Central Texas Council of Governments's Executive Board
of a regional citizen representative.
14. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
15. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
1
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 3, 1986
Page Six
16. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(a), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. S.
C. Personnel /Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
17. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on he day of , 1986 at o'clock
(a.t) p.m.
2211C
.
10
.ry vi.Sr .Y~r`,` }r? ~t4
112
Cf'yof Dfirf oN, TSXAa MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
Office of the City Manager
M E A U R A N D U M
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATE: May 30, 1986
SUBJECT: UENTUN COUNTY COMMUNICATION DATED MAY 2U, 19d6
REGARDING INDIGENT CARE EXPENSES
By means of the attached correspondence, Uenton. County has
officially asked the City's position regarding funding for
indigent health care. As Council is aware, the City of Denton
has, from time to time, provided capital improvement funds for
Flow Memorial Hospital but has contended tnat the indigent
health care cost was a County responsibility. with the passage
of senate Bill 1 , this position has been called Into question
by the County and some contend that the City is now legally
responsible for a portion of indigent neaitn care costs.
As tnis issue has been discussed from time to time during the
last several months, individual Council Members nave taken a
position that indigent health care should remain a function to
be funded by the entire County and snould not oecome a City
obligation. It has been recognized that tnis position might be
subject to legal challenge but it was felt to be a position
which was legitimate and proper.
Tnerefore, unless Council Members nave second tnougnts auout
this position, it is recommended that the position be restated
in a form approvea by toe City legal counsel and transmitted to
the county Commission.
,e4442~
oy marrell ~~~44-
ca
2219C
wstns rev Lq MAALM
n11aMCr 1 M WCM10
p+7) 362-400e 417) 4647410
MAIN !r .1ACOM ' s. a. Mwnim
PRECINCT 2 PRECINCT 4
(214) 436.3721 (617) 462.3413
SUDIN COt,a, JUDGE
401 W, HICKORY
Istr) 5664585
09NION COUNTY COMMMSIONE" COURT DUILMNO Z t E W, SYCAMORE, DENTON, TEXAS 76901 0 ltif4f+2p pr (E} n U344"
May 20, 1966
2 2
Honorable Ray Stephens, Mayor
City of Mon
21.E E. McKinney i,.
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mayor Stephens:
As you are probably awaro, the Indigent Health Care and Treatment Act, adopted as S.B. 10
first Called Session, 69th regislature, defines responsibility for certain medical
services for indigent persons. Basically the Act requires a public hospital to provide
either inpatient or outpatient hospital services, or all services provided in the
cVerating year proceeding January It 198S, whichever is greater. These services must be
provided to eligible residents as (Defined, either in the Act or by eligibility standards
4in existence during the operating year proceeding January It 1985, whichever is greater.
t appears that Flow Memorial Hospital is a public hospital as defined in. the Act.
Section 1.2.03 of the Act provides that "each governmental entity that owns, operates, or
losses a public hospital shall provide sufficient funding to the hospital to provide
the health care assistance required by this Act." Section 14.01 of the -Act provides
that "notwithstanding any other provision of law, if a public hwpitai owned, operated,
or leased by a governmental entity is sold or leaned to another person on or after
January 1, 1965, the lame or loss* of the pudic hospital does not offset the
governaental entity's obligation to provide the health cars services the public hospital
provided during that period." Those provisions are effective September It 1986.
Since these provisions place financial obligations upon governmental entities that owTn,
operate, or lease a public hospital, the Commissioners Court is attempting to determine
the County's obligations, if any, for the next fiscal you, for indigent health care. In
that regard, it would be helpful if the City of Denton would indicate its position on
the financial responsibility, if any, of the City of Denton after September It 1986, for
indigent health care. As we are presently preparing the County budget for the next
fiscal year, your prompt response would be appreciated.
Sincerely youre,___.
be R• tv
Acting ty stodge
*A/bb
DATE: May 299 1986
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Me*ers of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR INDEPENOEW T AUDITING SERVICES
SUMMARY:
Engagement for fiscal audit services
BACKGROUND:
Annual Audit Reports
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Budget impact
J
Respp'C'Itf fly subm t d:
J G~C✓'.-/ o errs
City Manager
ar by:
Prep
A0 F r e
Senior Secretary
Approved: ks; ~
JW F. C ra e
rector of Finance
1429F
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
FOR
INDEPENDENT AUDITING SERVICES
MAY, 1986
7111
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Nature of Request
The City of Denton is requesting proposals from certified
public accounting firms to perform financial and compliance
audits for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1986, and ending
September 30, 1987. Please note that the intent of the City of
Denton is to engage an auditing firm for a maximum period of
three (3) consecutive years.
City of Denton - General ln£ormation
The City of Denton is a rapidly growing community and
county seat located in the center of Denton, approximately forty
(40) miles northwest of downtown Dallas. The re are
approximately 46.8 miles of land included in the City't
corporate boundary, and the estimated population at October 1,
1985, was 60,000. (The 1980 Census was 48,063).
The City was incorporated on September 26, 1886 and
operates under tho Council-Manager form of government. The City
Council is comprised of a Mayor and six (6) members. The laity
Manager is appointed by the Council and as chief administrative
officer is responsible for appointing and supervising the i,eads
of City departments.
Services provided by the City under general governmental
functions include office and fire
p protection, health services,
planning and engineering, code► enforcement, street maintenance,
z
traffic control, parks operation and maintenance, recreation and
library services. In addition, electric services, water and
sewer services, and solid waste collection and disposal services
are provided under an Enterprise Fund concept, with user charges
set by the City Council to ensure adequate coverage of operating
expenses and payments on outstanding debt, with participant fees
covering the cost of providing the programs. Equipment
maintenance, printing, interoffice mail delivery, central
warehouse services, and property and casualty insurance services
are provided through Internal Service funds.
Approved 1985-86 budgets for the City's major operating and
debt service funds are presented in Exhibit I.
The 1985-86 City budget provides for 834 permanent,
full-time employees in all funds.
Other statistical information is presented in Exhibit 11
attached.
Accounting Process - Related Systems
The City's accounting records for general governmental
operations are maintained on a modified accrual oasis, with
revenues being recorded when available and measurable, and
expenditures being recorded when the services or goods are
received and the liabilities are incurred. Accounting records
for the City's enterprise funds are maintained on the accrual
basis.
3
mom
The general ledger accounting system is automated through
utilization of the City's mainframe computer IBM 4361. The
mainframe computer and a central Data Processing staff also
support the following automated systems:
- accounts payable
- accounts receivable
fixed assets account (currently being implemented)
payroll
-utility billing
warehouse inventory control
tax collections
A new fixed asset accounting system is presently being
implemented which will provide significantly greater management
control and information than the present manual recordings.
Urganizational Responsibility for the Accounting Function
The City of Denton Accounting division falls under the
general supervision of the Director of Finance, who reports to
the City Manager. The Assistant Director of Finance reports to
the Director of Finance and is the head of the division. The
present staff of the Accounting Department consists of ten O U)
positions as follows:
Assistant Director of Finance
Senior Accountant
Accountant (3)
Account Clerk (S)
Secretarial support is accomplished through Finance
Administration with large tasks processed through the Word
Processing Center.
4
GENERAL. CONDITIONS - SCOPE OF AUDIT
Scope of Audits
For each of the three (3) fiscal years covered by the
proposal, the audit shall include an examination of the
financial. statements of all accounts and funds of the City.
Such examination shall be made in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards promulgated by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in accordance with
the laws of the State of Texas.
In addition, as required by regulations of the U.S. office
of Revenue Sharing, Office of the Secretary of the 'treasury, the
annual audit engagement shall include an examination of the
City's Revenue Sharing funds administration. Specifically, the
examination is to be performed in accordance with generally
accepted government auditing standards, and is to include a
financial report on all funds, a compliance audit of revenue
Sharing funds, an auditors' report on the study and evaluation
of the City's internal accounting controls, and should address
any other applicable requirements that the Office of Revenue
Sharing may prescribe. The City has complied with audit
regulations relating to the use of Revenue Sharing funds through
the fiscal year ended September 30, 1985. The City has been
notified that the Revenue Sharing program comes under the
purview of the Single Audit Act of 1984 as the law becomes
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 1984.
This engagement is to include examinations to comply with the
Single Audit Act.
S
Current Federal and State Grants as of May 309 1986
U. S, Departanent of Housing 4 development
Rental Rehabilitation $113s578
Mental Rehabilitation 1U00000
CDBG FY 87 4709384
CDBG FY 86 677,918
CDBG FY 85 6149918
Uffice of the Governor
Criminal Justice Division
Crime Prevention 5 8,402
Crime Prevention 4 13,407
Texas Rehabilitation Commission
Recreation Services 4 Training Model $75,485
Recreation Services 4 'training Model 700000
FAA Airports Division, Department of Transportation
Airport Improvement $468050U
Airport Master Plan Study 340691
Office of Revenue Sharing, Department of Treasury
Revenue Sharing $4799502
The city may, at its discretion, request the Auditor to
perform other audits or reviews not specifically provided for in
this section. If such a request is made, the Auditor shall
submit a separate proposal for completing the engagement, along
with a proposed fee,
6
Reports Required
At the conclusion of each year's audit, the following
reports are to be provided by the auditor:
1. The Auditor shall provide two hundred (200)
copies of the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report (CAFR), bound and printed on regular
letter-size (8 1/2" x 1111) paper. The CAFR
shall be prepared in accordance with the
most recently issued Governmental Accounting
and Financial Reporting Principles (GAAFR),
as promulgated by the Governmental
Accounting Standar(ts Board (GASB) of the
Financial Accounting Foundations, and in the
format and with the content necessary in the
opinion of the Auditor to receive the
Certificate of Conformance in Financial
Reporting issued by the Government Finance
officers Association of the U.S. and Canada
(GFOA).
The CAFR shall include the Auditor's report
on examination of the financial statements
of the City. All financial statements shall
be prepared by the Auditor. The letter of
transmittal, which shall be addressed to the
Mayor and City Council and the City Manager
from the financial officer of the City,
7
r'§f -~..-.-i.......-eta _ ; r - _
shall be prepared by the City. The
Statistical Section of the CAYR Shall be
prepared by the City, subject to review and
approval by the Auditor.
The CAfR cover design and printing shall be
performed by the City. Printing and
binding/assembly of the entire report shall
be performed by the Auditor.
2, The Auditor shall observe the adequacy of
the City's system of internal control. if
deficiencies are noted, or if in the
opinion of the Auditor comments and
recommendations for improving internal
control should be made, such comments and
recommendations shall be included in a
separate management letter. This letter
shall be addressed to the Mayor and City
Council, but shall be reviewed in draft
form with the Director of Finance and the
Assistant Director of Finance before it is
prepared in final form. The Auditor shall
provide twenty (20) copies of the final
Management Letter,
3, The Auditor shall provide twenty (20)
copies of a report of determination of
8
compliance and opinion of same relating to
the General Revenue Sharing program in
conformance with the requirements of the
Office of Revenue Sharing.
4. The Auditor shall provide twenty (20) copies
of a report of determination of compliance
and opinion relating to the OMB Circular
A-128 (Single Audit Act) in conformance with
the Act.
S. The Auditor will provide at least one
copy of all work papers to be provided witnin
thirty (30) days after completion of 'AFK
delivery.
Exit Conference
The Huditor shall meet with the Director of Finance, and
the Assistant Director of Finance upon completion of all field
work to review all audit adjustments to financial statements and
management letter findings, This meeting shall take place prior
to preparation of the draft management letter,
Statements and Records to be Provided by the City
The City shall have closed and balanced all accounts and
have computer generated preliminary financial statements,
subject to subsequent client and audit adjustments, for all
funds to be examined by the Auditor, including the following:
9
'.;?Y-~i,"!py^rt' axi'Tf-r F.at 77,, ' 717W~
ylr• } _ ..s t
1. Combined statements:
a. Combined balance sheet for all fund types
and account groups;
b. Combined statements of revenues,
expenditures, and changes in fund
balances for all governmental fund types;
C* Combined statement of revenues,
expenditures, and changes in fund balance
(budget and actual) for general and
special revenue fund types; and
d. Combined statements of revenues,
expenses, and changes in retained
earnings (or equity) for all proprietary
fund types.
2. Combining statements of each particular fund
by fund type:
a. Combining statements (balance sheet and
statements of revenues, expenditure/
expenses and changes in fund
balance/retained earnings) for all fund
types for which the City maintains more
titan one fund.
Service Ntiraished to the Kuditor
The City shall provide the space and facilities necessary
for the Auditor to conduct the examination. In addition, all
information, data, reports, and records necessary for carrying
lu
. ,mss +.a*
out the work shall be furnished to the auditor without charge,
and the City shall cooperate with the Auditor in every
reasonable way to ensure timely completion of the audit.
Work Schedule
It is anticipated that the City's financial records for the
prior fiscal year will be ready for the Auditor's examination
beginning in mid-November, with the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report and all other final audit reports to be
presented to the City Council by the end of December.
With these dates in mind, a proposed work schedule for
completion of the annual audit process has been prepared and is
attached as Exhibit III. The proposal shall include a response
to this proposed work schedule, including recommended changes if
the schedule is not acceptable,
Ai gnment.of Auditing Staff and changes in Assigned Staff
it is understood by the City that the individuals specified
in the Auditor's Proposal are the individuals who will actually
do the work associated with the City audit.
The City reserves the right to approve or disapprove any change
to the assigned staff named in the Proposal, whether such change
occurs prior to or during the engagement. The City shall be
provided with a resume of any proposed substitute and shall be
given the opportunity to interview that person prior to its
decision to approvo or disapprove.
11
Certificate of Achievement
The City has earned the Certificate of Achievement in
Financial Reporting awarded by the Government Finance Officers
Association of the U.S, and Canada for two (2) consecutive
years, for fiscal year 1982-83 and 1983-84, and has applied for
fiscal year 1984-85. It is the intent of the City to remain in
receipt of the Certificate and expect the audit firm to assist
whenever possible and comply with GFOA's high data and
presentation standards necessary for the continued attainment of
the Certificate.
AUDITOR SELECTION CRITERIA
Final selection of the Auditor will be made by the Den-'on
City Council. Although not intended to be all-inclusive,
following is a list of factors which will be considered in
making the selection. All data presented in response to this
RFY is required to specifically address the experience of the
firm's local office.
1. Extent and quality of the governmental
auditing experience of the firm, basad on
information provided by the firm as well as
references of former and present clients;
2. Experience, and qualifications of person who
will be assigned to do the actual work;
3. Existing and future time commitments of
persons assigned to the project;
12
4. Proven ability of the firm to meet work
schedules and communicate effectively with
government officials;
5. Completeness of the project approach outlined
in the Proposal;
b. Auditor's demonstrated understanding of the
City's requireme,:ts and the Auditor's plan
for meeting them;
7. Degree of assurance by the Auditor that audit
procedures will minimize disruptions of the
City's normal activities and ensure timely
completion of the audit;
8. Degree of assurance by the Auditor that
technical assistance and advice will be
available to the city when requested
throughout the engagement period subject to
limitations mutually agreed to;
9. Proven ability of the firm and the persons
assigned to the project to assist former and
present clients in successfully obtaining the
Certificate of Achievement as awarded by the
Government Finance Officers Association of
the U.S. and Canada; and
13
~•Yp al~~T~4 v. .9~~ ~:-.'x:,_ .r r Ti'SO w,_ x, k ~-;q
10. Proposed cost shall be prepared on a basis on
a estimate of hours with a provisions for an
annual maximum fee. Any unforeseen or
anticipated cost must be approved by both
parties in advance.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSAL
Proposal Submission
Firms interested in responding to this Request for proposal
should mail proposals to:
John F, McGrane
Director of Finance
City of Denton
215 R. McKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Or, as an alternate, proposals may be delivered to the
office of the Director of Finance in the Denton Municipal
Building, 215 H. McKinney Street.
Proposals must be received no later than 5:00 P.M. on
Friday, June 13, 1986.
14
K
. e r ^r
Suggestions for Pre~parit Proposals
Interested firms are encouraged to use their own preferred
style and format in preparing a Proposal. However, it is
suggested that the Proposal include at least the following
(arranged accordingly):
1. A full description of the audit approach and
procedures which will be used.
2. A response to the conditions and requirements
outlined in the RFP, including the proposed
work schedule. Any reservations or
exceptions to the RFP (including the
proposed work schedule) should be fully
explained.
3. A listing of present and former governmental
clients for whom the firm has performed
auditing services similar to those outlined
in the RFP, including names, addresses and
phone numbers of persons who may be
contacted for references. It is particularly
important that the listing include present
and former governmental clients of the
firm's local office.
4, Professional resumes on all employees of the
firm who will bt assigned to this engagement,
indicating specific auditing experience to
is
date, with a clear indication as to what
specific responsibility each individual will
have.
5. Information as to what time commitment or
workload is presently assigned to each person
who will be working on this engagement.
Selection Process
Proposals submitted by June 13 in response to the RFP will
be reviewed by the City Manager, Director of Finance, and the
Assistant Director of Finance. Based on this review, interviews
may be scheduled with the firms considered to be the best
qualified, although interviews will not necessarily be scheduled
with all firms responding to the RFP,
Foliw!ing this initial screening process, recommendations
will be made for interviews. This committee will make
recommendations to the City Council which will make the final
selection. It is anticipated that the selection will be made on
or about July 15, 1986.
In all interviews held with the auditing firm, the proposed
Project Ma,~ager for the City's engagement and the individual who
will have on-site responsibility for the audit (if a person
other than the Project manager) should be present.
1
16
Compensation
The cost of services provided by the Auditor will be a
factor in making the selection. However, it will not be the
final determining factor.
Acceptance/Rejection of Proposal
The CiLLy reserves the right to accept the proposal
considered to be the most advantageous to the City and to reject
any and all proposals.
City Contact
Questions concerning the RFP or requests for additional
information should be directed to:
W. Jay Anderson
Assistant Director of Finance
OR
John F. McGrane
Director of Finance
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
(617) 566-8320
A copy of the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 19850 is enclosed.
17
ANNUAL BEIOOET.,`
EXHIBIT I
BUDGET SWIMARIES
1986-86
1984-86 1985-86
Estimate Proposed
REVENUES
General Fund $ 1708589302 $ 2000469712
Sanitation Fund 20004,888 2,6700486
Utility System Fund 839217,654 860347,929
Working Capital Fund 212739683 2,165,055
Recreation Fund 2040000 257,000
General Project Fund 512,580 ?63,702
Revenue Sharing Fund 529,121 264,561
General Debt Service Fund 2,553,063 - 30625,525
TOTAL REVENUES $10901530491 $0601409970
1984-85 1985-86
Estimate Proposed
EXPENDITURES
General Fund $ 18,1859606 $ 2000460712
Sanitation Fund 2,0199360 205700486
Utility System Fund 7598180963 86,5309161
Working Capital Fund 2,4129822 29765,055
Recreation Fund 1580050 243,019
General Project Fund 506,743 2630702
Revenue Sharing Fund 5290121 2640561
General Debt Service Fund 2,257,107 390540425
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $10198870771 $1140738,121
CITY OF DENTON 31
4
trs
Table 16
EXHIBIT I I
• CITY OF DENTON. TLXAB
MISCELLANEOUS STATISTICAL DATA
SEPTEMBER 30, 1,285
Form of 3overnmsnt Council-#4nager
Area 46,8 square miles
Tate of Incorporation September 26, 1866
Miles of Street* 220 miles
Number of Street Lights 49058
Fire Protections
Number of stations 4
Number of firemen and officers
(exclusive of volunteer firemen) 97
Police Protections
Number of stations 1
Number of policemen and officers 91
Municipal Electric Department:
Number of consumers 28,557
Electric production 685,890,000 KWH/year
Average Daily Consumption 1,7740860 KWH
Miles of electric line 327 miles
Municipal Water Departments
Number of consumers 16,373
Average daily production 90920,000 gallons
Average Daily Consumption 8,766,000 gallons
Miles of water main 300 miles +
Seweras
Sanitary sewers 275 miles +
Storm sewers (1)
Building Permits Issued 1,163
Recreation and Cultures
Number of parks 13 with 787 acres
Number of libraries 1
Number of volumes 95,000 (approx.)
Employees
Exempt 125
Nonexempt 668
Total 793
use
(1) Not Available
-121-
L , r Vin. . QIIIBIT III
CITY OF DUTOE
AMLL AUDIT PROCESS
PROPOSED WORK SCSEDULN FOR
COMPLETIOX Of 1985-86 AUDIT
City of
Date Denton Auditor
Engagement Letter to Council July 15► 1986 x
Begin interim field work July 21, 1986 x
Provide listing of any required
audit working papers August 49 1986 z
Draft statistical schedules September 15► 1986 x
Complete closing, including all
required manual journal entries November 1, 1986 x
Complete computer generat4d
year-end closing statement November 11, 1986 x
Begin final field work November 17, 1986 x
Complete audit working papers December 5, 1986 x
Hold exit conference, discuss all
audit adjustments to financial
statements and management letter
findings, Complete initial draft
report December 10, 1986 x x
Conclude review of working papers
and provide complete final draft
of financial reports for City of
Denton and Single Audit. December 16, 1986 x
Discuss draft management letter December 19, 1986 x x
Deliver final printed oopies of all
financial reports and required
copies of final management letter December 19, 1986 x
Acoeptan.ae of CAFR, auditor's
report, and management letter
by City Council December 23► 1986 x
Work session with City Council to
discuss audit findings (if necessary) January 6, 1Q87 x x
1911F
5/22/86
DATE: Yry 299 1986
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: ,PROPOSAL OF DENTON COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT TO COLLECT CITY OF
DENTON TAXES AND COST ANALYSIS
SUMMARY :
See attached memorandum to John McGrane
BACKGROUND:
See attached letter from Joe Rogers
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Cost to collect Ad Valorem Taxes
Rsspec ly submitted:
r re
City Manager
Pr ar d by:
Ann Forsythe
Senior Secretary
Approved:
~c
Q26 ,
40n rave
irector of Finance
1429F
CITY Of Ddl11TOhM, 71=8 MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MoKrNNEY Sr, J DENTON, TEXAS 78201
MEMORANDUM
■ a■ r a r a■■ a
DATE: May 27, 1986
TO: John F. McGrane, Director of Finance
FROM: W. Jay Andersors, Assistant Director of Finance
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL OF DENTON GOUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT
TO COLLECT CITY OF DENTON TAXES AND COST ANALYSIS
The Denton County Appraisal District (DCAD) charges the City of Denton an
annual fee that covers the cost of certain items. They are:
1. An Appraisal Roll
2. A computer (machine readable) tape of data
3. Supplemental Rolls
4. Change of ownership list
5. Exemption list
6. Agricultural exemption list
7. Certain State required reports--primarily the
"Effective Tax Rate Calculation" report
Our budgeted cost for this service has been as follows:
Appraisal District
Fiscal Year COD Budd _ Budget
1980-81 $ 866000 $ 8930215
1981-82 1020000 918,025
1982-83 1010354 100280975
1983-84 101,636 996,425
1984-85 1529200 194549378
1985-86 1679820 1,563,998
19PA-87* 1960216 1,886,022
*Proposed
81715004M D/FW METRO 4344M
,a f
Memo to John McGrane
May 27, 1986
Page two
In addition to the above items, for an additional fee certain other services
can be performed and would be charged accordingly:
1. Preliminary roll 9 $.09 per page
2. Tax statements @ $.32 per tax statement
3. Duplication of reports 9 $50.UU per hour computer time plus the
cost of paper
The City of Denton has chosen to use only the basic services at the fee
indicated. The fee is calculated as a percentage of Use total prior year tax
levy of the entity and then applied to the operating budget of the appraisal
district as proposed for that year. The City of Denton fee for Fiscal Year
1985-86 is calculated as follows from the 1985 tax levy:
Tax levy of City (divided by) $ 6.8480814
Total tax levy $61186091?6
Equals 11.01%
Times budget before outside services 19b24,246
(Total Budget is $1,553,9981
City of Denton fee $ 167A?j
The DCAD is now proposing to perform tax collections for the City of Denton at
a fee that would be in addition to the fee(s) indicated above. The fee
indicated would be 1% to 1.5% of the Jurisdictions levy as indicated in the
letter to the City Manager dated May 16, 198b from Joe Rogers, DCAD Chief
Appraiser. He also indicates this can be done in the 1987 tax year which is
our fiscal year 1987-88. In my visit with him on May 169 1986, at the DCAD
Board Meeting, he indicated he was not sure what the fee would be and it would
depand on the number of taxing Jurisdictions that would participate. He also
indicated that they would need eight (8) to ten O U) entities and that they
would need to include the major entities to be cost effective. The county
participating, the following schedule would indicate what this would mean in
terms of dollars based on FY 1986 figures.
Tax Levy 1985 $608080814
1.0% fee $68,088
1.5% fee $102,132
t ~ , "re° . ~F ~ .ten ` t ' z i . ,;.--F~ -'-'=~4•:s~'
Now to John McGrane
May 27, 1986
Page three
The budgeted cost for the tax division for fiscal year 1984-85, which is
ce-wparative data, was $64,675 or roughly equivalent to a 1% appraisal district
fee. This does not count any costs associated with our data processing or
casniering departments. The 1985 Griffith Study would indicate there are
associated costs. Total cost of service would be between the 1% and 1.5% fee.
As you know, the Tax Uivision does more than collect tastes. They maintain
special assessments, hotel/motel taxes, and do other analysis and reporting as
required. We are also expanding into auditing reporting entities to confirm
our information and keep up with legal actions. Therefore, even if the
Appraisal District would take over collections, the City's tax division costs
would still have to be budgeted.
In summary, our cost to perform tax collecting and it's other services,
internal and external, to the City is roughly equivalent. If the City should
go to the HAD for its services, it will still need to maintain the other
fiscal services. Therefore, there would no offset to the City's current
costs. My recommendation would be to enhance the tax software or replace it
and retain the tax division. ~ feel we can better control our collection
costs and collection efforts by maintaining our own office. This would also
allow us to keep our systems of checks and balances on the DCAD by keeping
these efforts in-house.
W. Jay Berson
WJA:af
1917F
I
ti t=
C1L".
DgNTON COUNyV to"ONSAL Mai W =T l f
sent wo~ss~a~rte~tT MAY r.o, pox nts g
oe~i'Ow,
Gil 6 ,q I" F-c
~17.6Et
jo . WORNS, CTA/R/A , ,CITY M1f~1~
. ems.
,Nov W1ttT[ f
GR AMMNtR A W OAOi. tkeNTA + k
JON UCK
JAMCS WAM
may 18, 1988
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Tx.
Attn: City Manajer
Dear Sir:
The Denton County Appraisal District will have the
ability to offer tax collections for the 1987 tax
year. Many of the taxing jurisdictions have been
interested in the collection package; however, at
this time none of the jurisdictions have committed
to the Appraisal District for collections, We feel
that part of the reason for a lack of commitment is
the Uncertainty of the cost of collections. As a
general rule, we have stated that 1% to 1.5% of the
jurisdiction's levy will cover the cost of collections.
As we approach the 1987 tax year, many of the cost
factors for collections can be identified and defi-
nitely determined. If we can get commitments from
several of the taxing jurisdictions, we can determine
a definite price per account for collections.
If several of the taxing jurisdictions, including some
of the larger ,jurisdictions, will allow the Appraisal
District to collect, the price per account can be
ioduced. The ball park figure of 1% to 1.5% of the
levy may be reduced to a much smaller percentage. At
this point, without commitment we cannot determine how
large or small this percentage will actually have to
be to cover the cost of collection,
We hope that there will be enough jurisdictions turning
collections over to us, in order to make the total pack-
age cost effec~;ive and to reduce the percentage to less
than 1% of the levy.
Thank you for your help in this matter. Please let
us know at your earliest convenience, if you are
willing to make a tentative commitment to Appraisal
District collections. At that time, we can estimate
the cost per account for the 1987 tax year,
,Sincere/
Joe D. ogers
Chief Appraiser
JDR/vs
CITY of DLNTON, TUX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAd rem / rELEPNONE (017) 0615.0307
ONke of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
DATE: May 30, 1986
SUBJECT: 1986 City Council Retreat Goals Update: Tentative
Meeting Schedule
The attached sheet is the tentative meeting schedule for City
Council retreat goal updates. Thes-i dates will be brought
becore the Council for their approval on Tuesday, June 3, 1986,
at the 5:30 p.m, work session.
1
etty Inc Kean
Assistant City Manager
lj
Attachment
2936M
e
DENTON CITY COUNCIL RETREAT GOALS UPDATE
TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE
Tuesday, June 3, 1986
Tuesday, July 29
Tuesday, September 9
Tuesday, October 28
Tu wday, December 9
Tuesday, January 27, 1987
Tuesday, March 10
Meetings will begin at 5:30 a.m. and goal updating will
begin at 7:00
* meeting at 5;30
~`71q' s .°yST R,~-• a 6° , ..R *P ~s:,.j r . s , '
City council Minutes
May 20, 1996
The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7100 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of the Municipal Building,
PRESENTt Mayor Stephens; Council Members Alexander, Chew,
Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENTt Mayor Pro Tom Alford
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of May 6, 1986.
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to approve the Minutes as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Stephens announced that items 3.A.1 (Bid ( 9609) and 3.A.4
(Bid 1 9618) had been removed from the Consent Agenda by staff.
Also item 4.H had been removed from the Ordinance section of the
agenda by staff.
2. Public Hearings
A, The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
the City of Denton requesting a change in zoning from the
agxieultural (A) classification to the single family (SF-7)
classification. The tract is b2,474 acres located at the southwest
corner of Hickory Creek Road and FM 2181 (Teasley Lane). The
property is shown in the Venter Survey, Abstract 1315. If the
zoning change is approved, the property may be utilized for any land
use permitted in the single family (SF-7) classification by the City
of Denton Zoning Ordinance. 2-1806
The Mayor opened the public, hearing.
Mr. Bob Carraway spoke in favor stating that no one representing the
landowner had appeared at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
on this petition because the property, at that time, was in
foreclosur!. Since that time, he had purchased the property and was
in favor of the change in zoning.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Martha Fujauski, Planning Intern, reported that 5 reply forms had
been mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 returned in opposition.
The primary concern by the City of Denton to initiating this r,~uuest
was to eliminate any future zoning [problems on the property. Staff
was recommending permanent zoning to obtain low intensity uses for
this area. Agricultural use zoning we:~; only temporary. If coned
single family 7 would establish a low density trend.
Chew motion, McAdams second to approve Z-1806. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. The Council held a public hearing concerning the
proposed annexation of approximately 66.42 acres situated In the
Moreau Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, and beginning adjacent and east
of Geesling Road, south of U.S. Highway 380 East, and west of
:,rinity Road. A-36
The Mayer opened the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, spoke in favor reporting that 8 reply
forms had been mailed with 0 returned. This was the second public
hearing on this annexation. The major portion of the annexation
parcel was at the request of Miller of Texas for the Lakeview
development.. Council had instructed staff to expand the annexation I
size to fill in any gaps which might be left, Staff had spoken to
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of May 20, 1986
Page Two
some of the resident property owners who would be affected by this
annexation regarding City services, etc. It was the recommendation
of staff to proceed with the annexation.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
McAdams motion, Chew second to continue the annexation procedure.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Consent Agenda
Chew motion McAdams second to approve the Consent Agenda with the
exception ort Bids 4 9609 and 9616. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agenda:
A. Bids and Purchase Orders;*
(REMOVED BY
STAFF) 1. Bid 4 9609 - Stuart Pershing paving/drainage
2. Bid 4 9616 - Driveway for Paige Road substation
3. Bid 4 9617 Lamps, HPit
(REMOVED BY
STAFF) 4. Bid 1 9618 Refuse containers
*~iid 1 9549 (Third party lease/pur7haae financing - addendum 11) was
inadvertently left off the Consent Agenda. The bid was listed and
approved as part of Ordinance No, 86-100,
B. Tax Refund:
1. Approval of a tax refund to Campus Square
Apartment, Ltd. in the amount of $2,911.51.
4. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-99
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENTr SUPPLIES
OR SERVICES= PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE? AND PROVIDING POR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye,` Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Riddlesperger
"aye,' Chew *aye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
a. The Council considered adoption of an oruinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
for public works or improvements.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-100
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR
THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROIEMENTS1
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR1 AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
01
srngC*; ,v w-^pxr ..S .r.-s~ . S 5 "+nm r. v S `-;4mc.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Muting of May 20, 1946
Page Three
McAdams motion,, Chew uecond to adopt the ordinance with the
exception of Did 1 9609. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,'
Alexander 'aye,, Hopkins 'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and
Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 239.17
acre tract located west of Bonnie Brae Street, east of Westgate
Drive, north of Payne Drive, and south of U.S. Highway 77. Z-1789
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-101
AN ORDINANCE; AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 239.17 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF BONNIE BRAE STREET, EAST OF
WESTGATE DRIVE, NORTH OF PAYNE DRIVE, AND SOUTH OF U. S.
HIGHWAY 77, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO
PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM
AGRICULTURAL "A' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVPLOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATIONS PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY
IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF;
AN[, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mcl.aams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Riddlesperger
'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
D. The council considered adoption of an ordinance and
3P~vice plan instituting annexation of approximately 142 acres being
part of the Moreau Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, and the Gideon
Wa1Xer Survey, Abstract 13300 and beginning approximately .9 mile
east of Mayhill Road and ending approximately 2,000 feet east of
Trinity Road. A-35
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT Of LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXA5I BEING ALL THAT LOT,
1RACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 142.0
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTUN, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF [hE; MORREAU
FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417, A14U THE GIDEON WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS]
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT' PROPERTYf
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Alexander motion, hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye,"
Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
E. The council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan instituting annexation of approximately 299.63 acres
between I-:5E and FM 426, and being part of the Gideon Walker
Survey, Abstract 1330, and the W. Durham Survey, Abstract 330. A-38
The following ordinance was presented:
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meetinq of may 20, 1966
Page Four
NO. 86-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO TH6 CITY OF DENTON# TEXASI BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATFLY 299.83
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATE[ IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING P"T OF THE GIDEON WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1330, AND THE W. DURHAM SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 3301 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAbt CLASSIFYING THE
SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'A" DISTRICT PROPERTYI AND DECLARING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye," hopkins "aye,' Riddlesperger
"ayes' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye," Motion carried
unanimously,
F, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan annexing approximately 103,2 acres beginning adjacent
and north or Jim Christal Road, south of U,S. Highways 380 West,
approximately 1/2 mile east of Egan Road and 3/4 mile west of
Underwood Road. A-34
The following ordinance was presented
NO, 86-102
AN ORUINANC£ ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DEN1'ON, TEXASI BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 103.2
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PACT OF THE MYERS,
JOHNSON,• BRUMMET AND GREEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 16991
DENTON COUNTY, TEXASI CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL
'A' DISTRICT PROPERTYI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, chow second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye," Riddlesperger
"aye,' Chew 'aye,' and mayor Stephens "aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending the schedule of feel provided for by Appendix A and B of
the Code of Ordinancest repealing all ordinances in conflict
herewith and providing for an effective date,
Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reporteb
that a new planned development ordinance had approved which would
give the City a better grip on development, The new process was
more complicated and required more staff time, The fees proposed in
this ordinance would allow a larger portion of the cost of providing
the service to be recouped.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-103
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING THE
SCHEDULE OF FEES PROVIDED FOR BY APPENDIX A AND I: OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCESI REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
hEREWITh AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins 'aye,' Rlddlesperger
"aye,' Chew "aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
1
I
1
City of Denton City Council minutes
hosting of may 20F 1985
Page Five
H, The Council was to have considered adoption of an
ordinance amending Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Denton, Texas, by amending the provisions relating to
participation and pro rata reimbursement agreements for water and
sewer facilities to provide that such agreements shall terminate
within one year thereof unless construction of the facilities has
begun.
This item was removed from the agenda by staff.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving an agreement providing for the lease of office space at
324 East. McKinney Street.
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation, reported that the
ordinance would approve an agreement to extend the existing lease
for 8 months. This would allow time to negotiate with the owner on
costs and also to look at other options.
Council Member Chew stated that he felt the citizens of. Denton would
us losing by leasing otfiee apace at this higher rate.
Council Member McAdams stated that leasing other office space which
might be less expensive had been discussed. She did have a concern
about the time involved in relocating the Data Processing equipment
from this present location.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that modifications had been made
to this building for the Data Processing equipment. A thorough
study must be completed before a move was accomplished, Staff was
recommending to extend the lease at 324 East McKinney at the present
rate. This would be an interim step and would allow time to
complete a study.
Council Member McAdams stated that perhaps it would be wise to move
the Data Processing equipment to City facilities and move other.
operations with less complex relocation problems to leasea apace.
The hollowing ordinance was presentedi
NO. 85-104
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR THE ;EASE
OF OFFICE SPACE A1' 324 EAST MCKIN14EY STRELT, AND DECL.',RIHO
AN EFFLCTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew secona to adopt the orainance.
Council Member Hopkins asked if it was necessary to extend the lease
until the end of the year.
Brinkman responded that time would be needea to negotiate for the
required space. Any new lease would not take effect until January
It 1987.
On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye,'
kidalesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Notion
carried unanimously.
5. Resolutians
A. The Council considered approval of a resolutiun
amending the Denton Development Guide, as revised, concerning
intensity policy at Robinson Road and Loop 288.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that this amendment was the
result of the Oakmont zoning request in early 1985. The Oakmont
planned development violated the intensity policy for that area as
MEN
, ry;.. .r-re.~.: yr .r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of May 20, 1986
page Six
not by the Dantoa Development Guide. Because of those violations of
the Guiae, staff could not recommend approval of the planned
development petition. An analysis was performed which concluded
that, due to the Loop 280 extension in this area, the intensity
policy should be amended.
Mayor Stephens asked how large was the area being amp:nded.
Carson reppondRd approximately 30 acres,
The following resolution was presented:
R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
Whereas, the Denton Development vulde, as amended, was
adopted as the official aR use an eve opmeat guide for the City
to be u!ad in conjunction with planning, development and land use
decisiorsr and
WHEREAS, the Guide provides for a procedure to implement
policy changes in regard to vurrent land use decisions; and
WHEREAS, a petition for the rezoning of land at the
intersection of Robinson Road and proposed Highway Loop 288 would
violatn the intensity policy for the area as provided in the Guide;
and
WHF:REAb, the Planning and Zoning Commission, after due
consideration and study, has recommended that the Guide be amended
to provide that the intensity policy for the intersection of
Robinson Road and proposed Highway Loop 288 be changed from a low
intensity to a moderate intensity area; and
WHEREAbp the Ci.y Council has received the recoomendation
of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and, after due consideration
of the currant and prulected land uses and zoning for the areal the
current and projectea design capacities for transportation
facilities, utilities, and other public facilities in the area; the
need for the proposed changer the impact such change would have on
the overall growth pattern of the area; whether such change would
maintain the concept of balanced growth between all quadrants of the
City; and the overall planning goals and concepts contained in the
Denton Dever ment Guider NOW, THEREFORE,
BE 11' RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I,
That the Denton Develo ment Guid , as revised, be hereby
amended by changing He Overa 11 Co•cept Flan' and 'Lana Intensity
Areas" maps of the Guide for the in'Irsectlon of Robinson Road and
proposed Highway Loop '168 from a low intensity area to a moderate
intensity area so that hereafter all existing policies of the Guide
applicable to moderate intensity areas shall be applicable to such
area.
SECTION II.
That a copy of this Resolution be attached to the Denton
Development Guide, as revised, showing the amendment herein made.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 20th day of May, 1966.
RAY ST 'P ENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DL-NTON, TEXAS
i
City of Denton city Council Minutes
Meeting of May 20, 1986
Page seven
ATTEST:
CHARtO.TE ALLEN, CIT 7' 8 CRETARY
CITY UP DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCh, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DL"NTON, TEXAS
HY:
Alexander motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved.
0i, roll call vote, McAdams "Aye,* Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins "aye,'
Riddlesporger "aye," Ch3w 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
6. The council held a discussion of granting authority for
Mayor to approve requests made through the County Commissioner's
Court for extension of services in the city of Denton
extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Mayor Stephens stated that the County Commissioner's court was
requesting approval from the Mayor prior to extending any lines
(water, telephone, etc.) into the extraterritorial jurisdiction. He
had received several such requests but had not been given the
authority given by Council to sign the forms.
Debra Urayovitch, City Attorney, reported that a resolutiunn enabling
the Mayor to sign such forms would be prepared for the next City
council meeting.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that staff would review the
requests and forward to the Mayor for signature, as appropriate.
McAdams motion, Chew second to instruct tie City Attorney to prepare
a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign such requests following a
review and recommendation from the City Manager and appropriate
a staff members. Motion carried unanimously.
The Council considered approval of an appointment to fill a
vacancy on the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Chew motion, Hopkins second to appoint Mr. Jadd Holt to the Plrnning
and Zoning Commission. Motion carried unanimously,
a. The Council considered approval of an appointment to fill a
vacancy on the Cable TV Advisory Board.
McAdai.;o motion, kiddlesperger second to appoint Mr, Joe Fearing to
the Cabl: TV Advisory Board. Motion carried unanimously.
9. The council considered approval of an appointment to the
North ^entral Texas Council of Government's Executive Board of a
regional citizen representative.
This item was listed on the agenda to be discussed in the Executive
bession under personnel/boara appointments.
10. The Council --jeivea a report and discussed the Etatus on
the lease agre-sment between the City of Denton and Maverick
Aircraft, Inc.
This item was listed on the agenda to be discussed in the Executive
Session under legal matters.
11. The Council received a report on the status of the proposed
asset transfer of Flow Memorial Hospital.
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of May 200 1986
page Eight
Council Member Xiddlesperger reported that the Committee which was
working out final details on the contract had met on May 15.
Significant progress had been made toward the solution of some of
the serious problems which were faced in filling in the details of
the contract. Another meeting would be held May 22, hopefully to
finish all of the deliberations and arrive at a final plan which
would be presented in due course to the city council.
Oebra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that a short report had been
included in her status report.
Mayor Stephens asked the City Attorney to brief the audience on the
outcome of the May 15 meeting,
Drayovitch reported that the new hospital board of Directors was
formed, elected their officers and designated their negotiating
team. The City was represented by mayor Stephens, C!iancil Member
kiddlesperger, Me. Drayovitch, and Mr. David Petruska From the law
firm of Fulbright and Jawokaki. The County was represented by Judge
Cole, Commissioier Tansey and their legal counsel. Also present
were two attorneys on behalf of the new board. The Board was
represented by Mike Whitten, Ken Newman and Jim Killingsworth. A
new agreement was proposed which, in some ways, put things back to
where we started in February prior to having a lot of the changes
being agreed to. Fourteen of the changes which were outlined in a
cover memo from the attorneys for the new Hospital Board included ,n
number of legal issues as well as business. It was the intent of
the parties to make a concerted effort to resolve the business
issues, the main one being consideration. Substantial progress was
made in this regard. The county had been concerned regarding the
issue of consideration, much more so than the City. The City was
partictilarly concerned about some provisions about representation,
the provision deleted from the agreement that required that they
continually maintain an emergency room and provide some of the other
type services that they are now. The commitment of this transfer by
the City envisioned a public hospital, simply for no other reason
than that was the motive of the Council Members behind ic. This was
communicated to the new Board who felt that they did not want to be
tied down by a requirement that they have an emergency room. After
about an hour of negotiation, it was determined that the hospital
would continue to offe. the same level of services that it is
offering now as well as those services which are offered by
community based non-profit hospital. In the future, if it is
proposed to delete any of those services, consent must be obtiinad
from the County and the City, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld. The next discussion item was the
consideration. A great seal of time was then spent discussing
conflict of interest. The County's attorneys h~,d drafted very
strict language concerning conflict of interest for the new Board
Members, Basically, it was much like the City Charter which
prohibits a Council Member from contracting with the City. This is
a very strict requirement. The County came back around and revised
the language prior to the time of the meeting. The new conflict of
interest provision allowed that if a Board Member had a business
interest exceeding y10,000, he could not enter into a contract with
the hospital. If the interest was less than $10,000, it woulo be
[permissible ,as long as the member abstained from voting, It was
felt very strongly by the new corporation directors that this was
unacceptable. After a protracted discussion in which the public
officials relayed the constraints under which they work, a
compromise was suggested to be presented to the council and the
Commissioners. The compromise was that as long as the Board Member
did not own more than 101 of the business and did not vote, it would
be okay to have that Board representative contract with the
huspital. Everyone was very dedicated to resolving these
outstanding issues, Tnere were a couple of items which it was
agreed to wait on which involve time deadlines under which the
County Judge and the city's Finance Director have to examine certain
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of May 20, 1966
Page tine
records of the hospital. The City and County would maka an account
proposal in that regard that will be satisfactory. Sums of the tied
issues were whether or not the City and County should make
representations and warranties with respect to the agreement. The
City's position all along had been that this is not an arm's length
business transaction and would not be putting them out a like sum.
In fact, there was a possibility that there would not be any money
ttansferred depending on how things went. Because this was not an
arm's length transaction, and because each representation and
warranty made by the City as to the condition of the hospital
constituted a potential liability that could in fact cause money
damages to be expended by the City and County, it had been her
understanding that the City and County did not look favorably on
such a position. This issue h!d been delayeti for further discussion
until May 22. It was also pointed out at the meeting that the day
before the transfer and the day afterward, the same people would be
operating the hospital. The reasoning involved was that there was
really not a severe need to warrant from yourself to yourself.
These were some of the issues which would be discussed on May 22. A
full and final agreement was expectod.
Council Member Chew asked about the conflict of interest policy. '
4rayovitch responded that the lawyers had been very severely
instructed that they were not to make these decisions. This was a
compromise which was agreed to be submitted to the Council. This
was purely a Council decision as to what was felt to be appropriate
and what could be tiorked out between the two groups.
Mayor Stephens stated that the summaries by Riddlesperger and
Orayovitch were on target. It was his fl rat time to meet with the
group on Thursday night and he was quite impressed with the int!reist
of all parties to try to work out something which would be to the
best interest of the community - a community based hospital. He had
been particularly impressed by the fact that the City and County
representatives were almost in total agreement. The hospital
representatives were watching the wording closely they did not want
to take on a contract to do a job unless they could set the
conditions to their liking. He felt they were going a little
overboard to the extent of wanting to have a provision that$ in case
things got bad in the future, they could still come back to Lhe City
and the County for bail cut.
Rrayovitch reported that, under the agreement which had been written
all throughout, tt wab anticipated that the 3% would not address all
the indigent care needs.
Riddlesperger stated yesl that was true on indigent care. It was
hoped that the problem of indigent care would be limited to A of
the net revenue. The agreement was that we settle the Issue of
indigent care beyond that 3%. The City did not agree with the
county representatives on this position on that particular item.
This issue woul7 probably be left for future determination.
Mayor Stephens stated that there had been some disagreement on the
issue of the 3%. Even the city's representatives were not in total
agreement on the figure. That had not been settled and when It came
back in the norm of a contract to discuss, the Council could look at
that particular subject. In reference to Council Member Chew's
question regarding conflict of interest, the City represer;.atIves
had mentioned the Charter requirement that a Council Meobot could
not do business with the City.
Drayovitch repotted that, basically that was what the City and
County had drafted originally. She further reported that, in order
to negotiate and to try to work towards a final agreement, the
provision of $2,500 had been added. The City charter went even
further than state law. It was then asked to change that from
$2,500 to $10,000 and that was then changed to 10%.
i
i
1
.
City of Denton City council minutes
Meeting of May 20, 1966
Page Ten
Stephens stated -that it was Attempted to make the conflict of
interest policy follow state law. 1`hat was pyrt of the whole
consideration which had to come back to the Council. He had raised
the question about Hoard Members serving and their companies doing
any business with the hospital.
Riddlesperger stated that the basic idea was that it would follow
state law and to do something like was done by the City Council.
When an item came up in which a Council Member was personally
involved, the member would walk out and not participate in that
discussion. The contemplation of the state law here was to be in
that order and this had been fully discussed. He did not feel that
there were any insurmountable problems but felt that the group
should be allowed to continue their discussion and come to some
conclusion before the City tried to make their decision for them.
He thought that best not to attempt to dictate to that group what
they should do at this time.
Council Member Chew stated that he had a problem with the conflict
of interest.
Drayovitch stated that it was some different because there were no
Council Members who have a financial contract with the City. The
point of the Board was that they were not public officials, but
rather would be operating a business.
Mayor Stephens reiterated what Council Member Riddlesperger aa:s
saying was that if thj Board Members had a conflict of interest,
they could abstain. The discussion at the meeting had not dealt
with that question but rather one of could the Board Member make
sales to the hospital corporation once the transfer was made or be a
part of a company that sold to the hospital. This was where the
proceedings had gotten somewhat heated.
Drayovitch reported that an agreement was reached that the 3% be
raised to 4% at such time as there was a $5,000,000 increase in
revenues to the hospital. Accordingly, if revenues went back down
that percentage would go back dawn to A.
Council Member Chew stated that this basically could mean a sliding
scale.
Mayor Stephens stated that the Council should think about this as
there was still time before the final agreement was reached.
12. New Business
No items of New Business were suggested by Council Members
for future agendas:
13. No items or miscellaneous matters from the City Manager
were received,
14. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel/board appointments, No
official action was taken.
with no further items of business, the sneetiny was adjourned,
RA TEP S, MAYOR
CH RIOT ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
1240]
IMF,
ohm"
Id amm""Of
"gksmos R. Zkostela"
w9m.141 rhomes R. Chastain is retiring after forty-&)e years
of dedicated service to the City of Denton since hie
employment on April 1S, 1915 and
WaaRSAS, during his Career With the City, Thomas R. Chastain
hlu consistently maintained an attitude of owperation
with and dedication to the stated goals of the Denton
Municipal Utility Department of the City of Dentoni and
NHSRBAS, Thomas R. Chastain has exhibited outstanding expertise,
dedicating much elms and effort in assisting With the
work of the Utility department and has shown graat
spirit in encouraging community involvement in the
best interests of the citisess of Dsaton~ and
wliaRRAS, Thows R. Chastain has always served above and beyond
the mere efficient discharge of his duties and has
responded to his duties in a loyal, trustworthy and
extremely faithful manner, in a spirit of ooopers-~ion
with his follow employees, and in eh,* best Interests
of the citisens of the Community)
mow, TusRspon, as IT Assova ar rar CowaL of rlJa CITY or DBMTON,
TRXASh
That the sincere and warm appreciation of the City
Council be formally conveyed to Mr. rbcmas R. Chastain
in a permanent manner by spreading this Aasolution
upon the official minutes of the City Counoii and
forwarding to his a true copy hereof,
PASSED AND APPROVAD this 3rd day of June, 1986.
C e~
RAY Sra NS0 MA FOR
:...,;;Y';,•~ r CITY OF Ask", rVxAS
i r.y A•r' ~
h;nnrM' ~
1Trssrh
Cl~R?OPM AUNN, CrrY AIRY
Crrr op Dzmm, raus
APPROVED AS TO LIG" FOANr
ME ISO BuRP1r / CTrr Ar WWP
Cfrr or aw", rum
i
~•x-x y
IDA„~
CITY COUNCIL RE°ORT FORMAT May 27, 1986
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LLOYD V. HARRELL♦ CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Presentation of Beautification Awards
RECOMMENDATION:
The Denton Beautifi~v P,A on Committee wishes to award Mr. Jack Starling
recognition for hia ;property improvement of landscaping his hime at
3609 Granada Trail.
SUI MARY
Mr. Starling was nominated for the award by the Beautification Committee
and selected by a panel of judges.
BAC ON:
Mr. Jack Starling, 3609 Granada Trail, has spent many hours perfecting a
variety of plant material at his home. This personal effort is certainly
a credit to the surrounding neighborhood and the Cite as a whole. Through
his efforts h has made a nosi ive influence on others and has contributed
PROS Ii' Z DEPARA 10 x CT :
FISCAL IMPACT:
RESP TPULLY S ITT
LLOYD V, HARRELL
CITY MANAGER
ED BY:
PREPAR
el)
A AL
M Robert K. Tichner
TITLE Suner.intendent of Parks
APPROVED:
i
i
j
TITLE
DATIE#
CITY QQUNCIL RE2QRT FORMA]` May 27, 1986
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: LLOYD V HAR!RELL, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Presentation of Beautification Awards
RECOMMENDATION:
The Denton Beautification Committee wishes to award the Taco Bueno 02,
1815 Safest University Drive, recognition for significant improvement
through landscaping.
surWRI
,Mo. Kelly McKeon or -060 representative has made significant improvement
in the area of University brave at the Taco Dueno Restaurant. The
landscaping adds greatly to the aesthetics of the facility and has
continued to be maintained since installation,
~ ACKCRO.UI 0:
This facilit%,? was nominated by the Beautification Committee and selected
by a panel of judges$
pMRAMi DEPARTMENTS OR CROUPS AFFECTED:
FISCAL IMPACT:
i`
RESP FULLY SU ED: /
LL YD V. HARRELL
CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: i
E Robert-K. Tickner
TITLE Superintendent of Parks
AP ED i
ITLE
fi.
P' %,W MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
MANLGEMENT PLAN
FISCAL YEAR 1987
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. OPERATING BUDGET . . . . . l
II. STAFFING . . . . 7
III. CAPITAL BUDGET . . . . . Addendum
FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
INCOME STATEMENT
FISCAL YEAR 1987 BUDGET
Revenue from Patient Services
Inpatient (Page 2) $ 19,581,600
Outpatient (Page 2) 2,967,600
Total Patient Revenue $ 229549,200
Deductions from Revenue
Contractual Allowances (Page 3) $ 3,156,880
Bad Debts (Page 3) 2,609,000
Other (Page 3) 186,900
Total Deductions $ 6,552,780
Net Patient Revenue $ 15,996,420
Other Operating Revenues 781,290
Total Operating Revenue (Page 4) $ 16,1771710
Operating Expenses (Pages 5 & 6)
Salaries $ 7,079,930
Benefits 10109,100
Professional Fees 2,721,270
Supplies 2,232000
Other 21004030
Total Operating Expenses 15,146,930
Net Income Before Depreciation $ 1,630,780
Depreciation 950,000
City Capital Contributions 250,000
Non-Operating Revenues 40,000
Net Income $ 970,780
-1-
TIM
FLOW MEMORIAL' HOSPITAL
PATIENT REVENUE
FISCAL YEAR 1987 BUDGET
INPATIENT OUTPATIENT
Medical/Surgical $ 2,148,940
Med/Surg - Pediatrics 273,750
Med/Surg - PCU 295,650
Postpartum 684,370
Nursery/NICU 895,640
ICU/CCU 5699400
Nurse-Midwifery 1319490 215,500
Labor & Delivery 457,430 50,830
OR/RR 714,000 222,010
Emergency Roum 143,700 628,860
Central Supplv 19831,000 260,000
Pharmacy/IV 3012,500 2349330
Laboratiry/Blood 2,352,040 272,840
Cardiopulmonary 2,280,060 62,890
Radiology 817,110 502,930
Behavioral Medicine 1,342,300 -0-
Anesthesia 550000 122,050
Physical Therapy 165,900 50,800
Home Health Service -0- 341,680
Social Service 16,320 2,880
Total $ 19,581,600 2,9679600
,
- 2 -
FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
DEDUCTIONS FROM REVZNUE
FISCAL YEAR 1987 BULGET
Percentage of Percentage Contractual/
Total Revenue Collectible Write-Off X
Medicare 28 Z 60 X 40 X
Medicaid 7 60 40
Commercial Insurance 35 95 5
Blue Cross 6 95 5
Self-Pay 17 44 56
Hill-Burton 2 0 100
Indigent 4 85 15
County Psychiatric/Jail 1 85 15
Contractual Allowance
Revenue Budget $ 22,549,200
Medicare/Medicaid Revenue Percentage 35 X
Medicare/Medicaid Revenue $ 7,892,200
Contractual Allowance Percentage 40 %
Total Contractual Allowance $ 3,156,880
Bad Debt
Revenue Budget $ 22,549,200
Commercial + Blue Cross Revenue % 41 %
Commercial + Blue Cross Revenue 9,24 5,
Bad Debt Percentage 5 X
Bad Debt Amount $ 4629300
Self-Pay Percentage 17 %
Self-Pay Revenue 3,833,400
Bad Debt Percentage 56 2
Bad Debt Amount $21146000
Total Bad Debt 2,609000
Other
Revenue Budget $ 22,549,200
Hill-Burton Revenue Percentage 2 X.
Hill-Burton Obligatlon $ 451,000
Indigent Revenue Percentage 4 %
Indigent Revenue $ 902000
County Payment at 85 % 766,700
Indigent Deduction $ 135,300
County Psych & Jail Revenue Percentage l X
Revenue $ 22k.500
County Payment at 85% 191,700
Psych & Jail Deduction $ 33,800
Administrative !reductions 166,800
Total Other Deductions ; 7860900
3
FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
OTHER OPERATING REVENUE
FISCAL YEAR 1987 BUDGET
Fiscal Year 1986 Fiscal Year 1987 Variance
Estimate Budget _ Percentage
Cafeteria 1111900 $ 115,800 3.5 1
Record Abstracting 5,600 6,000 7.1
Gift Shop 29,600 33000 11.5
Educational Serviced 58,940 96,890 64.4
Recovery of Bad Debts 4690960 472,600 .6
Miscellaneous2 24}670 57,000 131.0
700p610 781,290 11.5 2
1. Educational service will ncrease with the additional programs of Be Trim,
Smoke Stoppers, and SmartCard (medical identification cards).
2. Miscellaneous will increase due to sale of used beds and furniture.
-4-
FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
OPERATING EXPENSE COMPARATIVE
FISCAL YEAR 1987 BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR VARIANCE
COST CENTER 1986 BUDGET 1987 BUDGET PERCENTILE
Nursing Administration $ 187,080 $ 204,040 9.1 %
Medical/Surgical 685,440 877,710 28.1
Med/Sung - Pediatrics 303,300 222,370 (26.7)
Med/Surg - PCU 309,600 306,460 (1.0)
Postpartum 2809750 305,830 8.9
Nursery/NICU 457,660 480,460 5.0
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) 338,770 131060 (2.1)
Labor and Delivery 548,240 487,500 (11.1)
Operating Room/Recovery Room 411,850 422,080 2.5
Emergency Room 579,240 6069240 4.7
Central Supply 1047,480 785,300 (25.0)
Laboratory/Blood Bank 872,800 914010 4.8
Cardiopulmonary 394,070 376,960 (4.3)
Radiology 638154U 495070 (20.5)
Pharmacy/IV 659,500 720050 9.3
Behavioral Medicine 505,280 503,760 (0.3)
Anesthesia 286,260 262,140 (8.4)
Physical Therapy 121,800 125,490 3.0
Medical Records 173,210 190,600 10.0
Dietary/Nutrition 5900880 655,460 10.9
Plant/Security 363,480 350,350 (3.6)
Housekeeping 270,960 277,100 2.3
Laundry 137,520 170,400 23.9
Nurse-Midwifery 1479480 431,150 192.3
Fiscal Affairs 267,200 305,750 14.4
Business Office 7B8,360 840,640 6.6
Administration 2189640 333,610 52.6
Purchasing 73,200 819490 11.3
Personnel 70,300 76,440 8.7
Health Promotion 114,650 177,930 55.2
Quality Assurance/ Risk Mgmt 82,560 114,030 38.1
Home Health Services 179,880 230,880 28,4
Auxiliary 31,800 41,670 31.0
Social Service 19,200 69000 260.9
Marketing 99,840 144,050 44.3
Pre-Admission Planning -0- 699450 -0-
Utilities 665,040 538,000 (19.1)
TOTAL 12j921,840 4 13027,830 4.7 %
- 5 - ~ .
I
~rrrr.►,
FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
FISCAL YEAR 1987 BUDGET
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Variance
1986 Budget 1987 Budget Percentage
Employee Benefits
FICA $ 457,200 $ 503,500 10.1 x
Unemployment Insurance 27,500 300000 9,1
Health Insurance 364,000 418,600 15.0
Pension 9%190 104400 7.0
Workmen's Compensation 49,580 - 53400 6.9
Total Benefits $ 995,470 1111090100 11.4 z
Fees
Consultant & Management $ 344,200 $ 300,000 (12,8)%
Professional Liability 115,100 2010500 75.0
Other Insurance 381000 66,500 7510
Total Fees $ 497,300 $ 568,000 14.2 X
Other
Interest Expense $ 100,200 $ 280,000 -0-
Rental/Lease Equipment 81400 86,000 6,2 Z
Dues 35,000 40,500 15.7
Postage 351500 39` ~Op 9.9
Total. Other 251,700 445,500 77.0 %
_6_
FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
STAFFING - FTE' S
FISCAL YEAR 1987 BUDGET
January 1986
to Fiscal Year Actual
March 1986 1987 Budget Variance
Nursing Administration 6.9 6.5 (,4)
Medical/Surgical 35.6 34,8 (.8)'
Medical/Surgical - Pediatrics 7.7 7.7 _
ICU/PCU 20.4 .1916 (.8)
Postpartum 12.0 11.7 (.3)
Nursery/NICU 16.4 16.2 (.2)
Labor and Delivery 15.1 15.1 -
Operating and Recovery Room 11,7 12.0 .3
Emergency Room 9.2 9.2 _
Total Nursing 135.0 132.8 2.2
Central Supplies 5.0 9 4,0 (1-0)
Cardiopulmonary 11.1 10.3 (.8)
Radiology 7.8 8.0 2
Pharmacy 6.8 6.0 (.8)
Behavioral Medicine 20.8 18.5 (2.3)
Physical Therapy 3.4 7,0 (,4)
Medical Records 7,4 8,4 1.0
Dietary/Nutrition 26.6 25.0 (1.6)
Plant/Security 11,2 11.8 .6
Housekeeping 20.8 15.5 (5.3)
Laundry 1.0 - (110),
Fiscal/Business Office 41.5 36.7 (4.8)
Administration 3.2 4.2 1.0
Quality Assurance 3,5 4.0 .5
Auxiliary .6 .6 -
Purchasing 3.3 3.3
Personnel 2.0 2.0
Health Promotion 3.2 3.0 (.2)
Marketing 1.8 210 .2
Social Services 1.0 _ 3.0 2.0
Total Non-Nursa,ng 182.0 169,3 (12.7
Total FTEat 317.0 301.1 14,9
Pre-Admission Screening Service - 2,5 2.5
Roma Health Service 4.6 6.5 1.9
GRNAs 5.0 3.0 (2,0)
Nurse-Midwives 3.3 _ 9.0 5.6
Total Hospital FTEst 329.9 323.1 6.8
rTEs/Patient Day • 4.6
FTEs/Adjusted Pt Day a 3.4
-7-
q.
FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
1987, 1988, 1984
Three Yea: Capital Equipment Budget Summary
CAPITAL BUDGET
DEPARTMENT NAME
Priority/Quantity 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989
MEDT.CAL/SURGICAL
A 4 BP/pulse/temp IVAC monitor $ 8,600
A 1 Shower Room 3,000
$ 11,600
LABOR & DELIVERY
A 1 Blanket warmer $ 3,500
B 2 Fetal monitor 110000 $ 11,000
B 2 Labor t nsport bed 21800 2o800
B 1 Neonatal. resuscitator 80500
B 1 Delivery/surgery table 12,000
C 1 Flash sterilizer 14,000
B 1 Imex dopplar 11100
A 2 Vital signs monitor 4,900
$ 310800 $ 39,800
EMERGENCY ROOM
A 1 Surgical stretcher $ 4,000
B 1 External pacemaker 2,995
B 1 IVAC vital signs monitor 21150
B 1 Adult stretcher 3,980
C 1 Autotransfuser $ 16,960
$ 13,125 $ 16,960
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
8 2 Vital signs monitor $ 4,300
B 1 Cardiac output monitor S,512
$ 9 9i2
Flow Memorial Hospital 2
Capital Budget - 19879 19881 1989
DEPARTMENT NAME
Priority/Quantity 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989
RECOVERY ROOM
B 1 Blanket warmer 3,000 $ $
C 1 Ice machine 5,000
B 1 EKG monitor 7,950
B 1 Pediatric stretcher 3,000
$ 6,000 $ 5,000 $ 7,950
OPERATING ROOM
B I Flash sterilizer $ 16,500 $ $
C 1 Cystoscopy table 25,O00
B 2 OR lights 79500 7,500
C 1 OR table 17,000
B 1 Rolling sitting Atool 650
$ 24,650 $ 329500 $ 17,000
PROGRESSIVE CARE UNIT
A 1 Base monitor b 8 telemetry
units $ 35,000 $ $
B 1 Vital signs monitor 2,150
$ 37,150 $ $
PEDIATRICS
A 6 Steel cribs $ 8,280 $ $
A 1 Youth bed crib 10880
C 1 Vital check 21150
B 1 Digital scale 1400
$ 14,110 $ $
POSTPARTUM
B 1 Adult wheelchair $ 800 $ $
B 1 Vital check 29150
A 1 HP fetal monitor 11000
$ 3►950 $ $
Flop Memorial Hospital
Capital Budget - 1987, 19880 1989 3
DEPARTMENT NAME
Priorit uantit 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989
NEONATAL NURSERY
A 2 Neo Tech Monitor $ 6,500 $ 6,500
B 1 Ohio I.C. Incubator 6,8OC
A 1 Auto Syringe 2,000
B 1 Mini Bili Light 1,300
$ 16,600 $ 6,500
NURSERY
A 1 Portable Radiant Warmer $ 3,700
A 2 Armstrong Incubator $ 3,500 $ 39500
B 1 C-100 D-W Isolette 6,000
B 1 Phototherapy Light 1,200
A 1 Bili Dosemeter 2,100
$ 13,000 $ 3,500 $ 3,500
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
A i Carpet for hallways &
patient rooms $ 21,000
A 1 Ceramic Kiln 650
B 1 Washing Machine 850
B 1 Heavy Duty Dryer 750
B 2 Refrigerators $ 1,000
B 1 3 Seat Lounge $ 10500
B 1 2 Seat Lounge 1,200
B 2 Lounge Chairs 1 500
$ 23,250 $ 1,000 $ 4,20
HEALTH PROMOTION
B 1 VCR Monitor with Time Lapse $ 10895
B 1 Opaque Projector 800
A 1 16mm Projector 1000
B 1 Recording-Anne $ 1,600
A 2 Reausci-Anne 1,200
B 1 Anatomic-Anne 450
$ 3,995 $ 3►250
c
Flow Memorial Hospital
Capital Budget - 1981, 1988, 1989 4
DEPARTMENT NAME
Priority/Quantity 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989
PHARMACY
A 1 Night Pharmacy Cart $ 21500
8 1 Cadet U/D Machine 3,000
$ 5$00
RADIOLOGY
B 1 600 MA Generator
Photo-time chart $ 27,939
A 1 R 6 F Equipment 125,779
8 1 Room IV Equipment $ 400,520
S 1 Portable X-ray Unit 14,000
B 1 Film Processor 17,000
$ 153,718 $ 431,520
DIETARY
B 1 Mini (wick Tray Line $ 280000
B 5 Patient Tray Carts 10,000
8 2 4 Well Steam Tables 4,000
B 1 Starter Unit 10000
B 1 Unitized base heater
dispensers 4,000
$ 47,000
CENTRAL SUPPLY
A 2 Thoracic Aspirator 1 600
$ 1,600
RESPIRATORY THERAPY
A 1 Blood Gas Analyzer $ 38,000
B 1 Pulse Oximeter 4,000
A 4 Pressure Monitor 7,200
A 1 Prrcussor 2,000
A 2 02 Monitor $ 1,650
B 1 Ventilator 180000
C 1 Co-oximeter $ 149000
B 1 Ventilator Monitor 2$00
$ 51,200 $ 22,150 $ 140000
Flow Meawrial Hospital
Capital Budget - 1981. 1988, 1989 5
DEPARTMENT NAME
Pr~ iority Quantity 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989
E.K.G.
B I EEG Machine $ 25,000
B 1 Stress Test System' $ 50,000
A 1 Panasonic Monitor 700
C 1 EEG System $ 180000
A L Treadmill Belt 500
$ 51,200 $ 150000 $ 180000
PHYSICAL THERAPY
A 1 CPM Lower Unit $ 3,200
B 1 Ergometer 900
B 1 Typewriter 10100
B 1 Portable Ultrasound 10200
B 1 Podiatry Whirlpool $ 3,400
B 3 Tens Unit 19800
B 1 Tilt Table 1,100
B I Cold Pack Unit 10900
B 1 Hot Pack Unit 10400
3 1 Tall Boy Whirlpool $ 2,400
B I Adjustable Chair 600
C 1 Treatment Table 19600
C 3 Tens Unit 2,100
$ 69400 $ 7,600 6,700
HOME. HEALTH
B 1 Typewriter (Data Entry) $ 1,200
B 1 Patient Transport Vehicle 20,000
B 3 Automobiles 24,000
$ 45►2OU
DATA PROCESSING
B 1 Decollator 3 000
$ 3,000
MEDICAL RECORDS
B 1 Microfilm Cabinet $ 10200
A 1 Word Processor Acoustical
Covers 10000
B 1 Micromatics Dictating System 450370
$ 20200 $ 45,370
Flow `Memorial Hospital
Capital Budget - 1987, 1988s 1989 6
DEPARTMENT NAME
Prinri~ Qugntity 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989
ANESTHESIOLOGY
A 2 Auto SP Monitor $ 5,000
B 2 Auesthesia Machines 160000 $ 160000
A 2 Fluid Warmer 1,360,
A 4 Hypo-thereto Units 4,250 4,250
B 8 Oximeters 29320 11160 1,160
$ 28,930 $ 2L ; 1, x60'
QUALITY ASSURANCE
B I Typewriter $ 900
C 1 Printer 10000
C 1 Tape Backup 50000
$ 6,900
MAINTENANCE
A L Steam Generator $ 3!,000
A 1 Convert Double Duct 103,000
A 1 Seal/Repair Circular Drive 2,000
B i Seal/Repair Visitor lot $ 9,720
A 1 Seal/Repair Director lot 7,020
B 1 Replace Copper Wiring 79000
B 1 Unloading Dock Door 1,890
A 1 Rebuild Air Handler 10500
A 1 Motorized Tube Brush Machine 11500
B 1 Transfer Switch Generator $ 20,000
A 1 Mad/Surg Nurse Call 219000
B 1 PCU Nurse Call 8,283
8 1 Pediatrics Nurse Call 16,070
B 1 O.B. Nurse Call 8,230
B 1 L&D Nurse Call 8,478
C 1 OR Nurse Call 90050
A 1 Repaint Window Awnings 40,000
A 1 Repair Roof South Wing 22,000
B 1 Roof over Dining Room/L&D 12,860
C 1 Roof over ER/OR/Maint. Shop 11,930
B 1 System Vacuum Pump 4,100
A 1 Upgrade T.V. Antenna 4,500
C 1 Double Duct Air Handler 65,000
B 1 Van 15,000
$ 256,520 $ 78,681 $ 96,930
Flow Mozorial Hospital
Capital Budget - 1987, 1988, 1989 7
DEPARTMENT NAME
Priority Quantity 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989
PATHOLOGY
A 1 Body Lifter $ 10500.
A 1 Weight Scale System 31800
$ 5,300
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
Renovation of E.R. $ 400,000
Renovation of Cafeteria 20,000
Patient Room Renovation 20,000
Doctors Lounge 15,000
Facility Renovations 200,000 150,000 150,000
$ 6559000 $ 1500000 $ 1500000
PHYSICIAN REQUESTS
A 1 Olympus GIF-2T10 $ 9,600
A 1 Olympus Heater Probe 5000
A I Olympus CLV-10 Light Source 5,700
A 1 Olympus JF-IT10 10,400
A 1 Olympus CF-IT101, 90950
A 1 Olympus GIF-X010 9,400
A 2 Surgical Stretcher 80000
B 1 Cataract Irrigation/Aspirator 12,000
8 1 Bipolar Cautery 1,000
B 2 Recliner for outpatient area 2,000
C 1 Back-up Instruments 5,000
$ 78,050
$1,559,760 $ 890,241 S 336,440
A PNnsy Nowrs OmwV
May 8, 1988
13.1886
1
`!.1 q
Me. Charlotte Allen CITY rr ,raw; ;
City of Denton
Ref; Agenda for City Council Meeting
Dear Ms, Allen:
I represent the Alumni Association of the Kappa Sigma Fraternity. Each year our
organization hosts a golf tournament, barbeque, and awards presentation somewhere In
the Metroplex vacinity.
Since the Sheraton has reorganized and upgraded the North Texas State Golf Course,
we have decided to hold our tournament at North Texas State this year, Hopefully this
will become an annual event,
Our organization would like to hold our barbeque and awards presentation and reception
at our fraternity house, located at 2026 W. Oak Street, on June 21, 1988. It will take
place between the hours of 6:30 p.mo and 11:00 p^ We Intend to have a band for
entertainment at this awards presentation,
After discussing this matter with the City Attorney, he Informed me of the Denton
City Code, Section 14-21, Paragraph 2 which basically states that any outside activities
using a loudspeaker which takes place after 10:00 p.m. is unlawful unless It is exempted
by the City Council, We would like to be put on the Agenda for the next City Council
meeting to get approval for our barbeque, & awards presentation to be held at our
fraternity house, If you need any further information, you may reach me at (214) 233-
$112. 1 appreciate your help in bringing our alumni back to N,T,S,U.
Cordiaq
ici t H ogarth
al Chairman
Kappa Sigma Alumni Associacion
MH/jj
okt+omm corpwsow, lMooopo itan Plus H, 13749 Nwt w Itt, N200. 0111ar, TX 75244 (214) 23"112
s "~s _
W77"?
' ,
DATE: June 3, 1 *6
CITY COUNCIL. REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: S-167
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered
this request at its meeting of April 23, 1986
and recommended approval by a 6-U vote.
SUMMARY: This is a request for an amendment to S-167, to allow
the construction of an activities building that 1s not
Included on the original site plan.
BACKGROUND: This area is 22 percent over the intensity standard
based on existing land use and 36 percent over based
on current zoning,
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the general fund.
Res fu1 u d:
freh
City Manager
Prepare d by:
ary as er
Plan ng Technician
Appr d
ref f
Director of Planning
and Development
7777 I a x.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: S-167 (Amendment) Meeting Date: June 3, 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: James Gilbert - Cumberland
Presbyterian Children's Home
Statue of Applicant: Administrator of the Cumberland
Presbyterian Children's Home
Requested Action: Amendment to specific use permit 167
(S-167), to allow the construction of
an activities building that is not
included on the original site plan.
Location and Size: Southwest corner of Bernard and
Greenlee otreet; further described as
1304 Bernard Street. Sizes 17.327
acres.
Surrounding T,and Use
and zoning: North - Singly, family structures;
single family (SF-7) zoning
South - Single family structures,
commercial zoning
East - Single family structure and
vacant lot, planned
development for multi-family,
and single family (SF-7)
zoning
West - Single family structures;
single family (SF-7) zoning
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as moderate
intensity.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Existing streets are adequate to
serve proposed development. No
access will be permitted to I-35
service road. Future service drive
entrance that iL proposed for Bernard
Street on the site plan, will not be
permitted.
(Case S-167)
page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Utilities; The sewage line on Bernard Street
running south to Lindsey street,
should be used for the sewage
generated by this development. If
this project is connected to the
northern sewer line on Bernard
Street, the City of Denton must
construct a relief sewer on Eagle Dr.
from Cleveland to S. Elm in the CIP
program, before this project can
connect to the system. It appears
that adequate water service is
available for this project.
Telephone, cable, and electric
service is available.
Drainage: The drainage channel along the south
property line must be improved.
HISTORY
On April 5, 1983, City Council approved the 6.pecific use permit
(5-167), to allow expansion of the existing Cumberland
Presbyterian Children's Hone with the following conditions:
1. Uses and facilities stall be limited to those incidental
or related to the Children's Home and shall conform to the
approved site plan.
2. All applicable development codes of the City of Denton
(zoning ordinance, building permits, etc.) shall be
enforced.
3. The Children's Home use shall be limited to the 17.359
acre tract exhibited on the approved site plan.
ANALYSIS
The Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Home is a legal
non-conforming institutional use that has existed at its present
address, 1304 9ernard Street, since 1939. The Children's Home
is classified as an institution of religious or philanthropic
nature by the current City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
(Case S-167)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan and
setbacks are adequate, This area is 22% over the intensity
standard based on existing land use and 36% over, based on
current zoning.
It is beneficial for the general welfare of the City of Denton,
for developers to provide their own recreational facilities.
While staff cannot recommend approval of this request, due to
the violation of intensity standards, the City Council may wish
to consider this request as beneficial to the City of Denton.
The request for an amendment to 5-167 is to allow the construc-
tion of a recreational building, The attached site plan shows
the existing facilities, as well as proposed development at the
site of the Children's Home. The scale and scope of the pro-
posed structure appears to be reasonable.
RECOMMENDATION
Due to violations of intensity standards, staff could not
recommend opproval of this request. However, the scope and
scale of the proposed structure appears to be reasonable. The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of 5-167 on
April 23, 19860 by a vote of 0-0, subject to the following
condit iorks %
1. Uses and facilities shall be limited to those incidental
or related to the Children's Home and shall conform to
the approved site plan.
2. All applicable development codes of the City of Donton
(zoning ordinance, building permits, etc.) shall be enforced.
3. The Children's Home use shall be limited to the 17.359 acre
tract ..xhibited on the approved site plan.
I
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Amended site plan
3. Approved site plan
4. Approved specific use (5-167) ordinance
S. Reply form totals
6. Property owner list
7. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of April 23, 1986
.iNI
I 1
7 T1
i P
I'
I
~ I ~ 5-162 I
MF-I
S•l l 9.120 I ~•7S .
MF•t
1
1 fry 4
5.69 870 /,r- •a `
opoll,
42 F
t.. ,
o- lob
it r!
lop I
4 on
H I 41
i ~ r r ~ r.rrlr~
a FOP
NSF E6 ,
III I ~ w.
f i I r.1~1~1 7
+II I ~..I wow O
' I I
10
om _ ~ C
r ~ a
w. Nlwn ~I ~ Irlew000
ft.
I ~ RIB
\
MI.M' Ols,y MpF/M11M lIOl11rN'! 1~~ 1NC.
"
!1 0 9 e111 !0N 1 ! N !lfll~LO1~MIwo"
+ e } ~ an r
I r +
,
5 167
' 1111«I{A~l, •I.11 ~rr~,g IIYY~'1 MI.
I
r
1
O ~if1 //tl~Irra
I w««.«I« w~N,1
O Rw j«y~yiw~w
TOTAL W rIH llrfr • IW.1 .r«. f
8 Mary Jv,
O rlMr MN« Ipal.y IM MN ~
Nt"""'I O W~W ~ 1~ 11
Nw«M W «w WIN
I pie ' - . I O Wr1. Ny4
r @ ".00i tom
L~ 4 ' f
O I ' p ".w.rl.
I
I f O ►I+Mr MIM«Y "««yr
01"14 rlnl
1
if 1
1 I ® (01 01"14
Q ~ I ~ t►IU r ve1►
W ILL Q , % 1) 1 Semi I SMr 1 01~ r .,r.
r1p
1 ~
• . Z^.• t 1 NM N«.11 r««r carry W W. NIR
1v , r r r'«r1 NIM/W 1«N~y
M / ~~~1 Ir I, ;0~~
• f1117r1) I 'I ~'J ar.lr IWI w+lti (IM~1 ~N,
O ...w rl«.,.W w~
to No,"
a ® • I ; o MIN NMN W..« «r NI I
1.
1 ,yY s.,
's
s
No.
Ail ORDINANCE GRAM' 1*G A SPECIFIC USX PERMIT AND AMENDING THE
ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DEN'1'ON, TEXAS, As SAME WAS ADOPTED AS
AN APPENDIX To TEE CODE OF ORO MAMCEs OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXASo BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-i, AND AS SAID NAP APPLIES TO
APPROXIMATELY 17.359 ACRES OF LAMD, AND BEING LOCATED AT THE
NORTHMEBT CORNER Of BERNARD AND GRMNLEE, AS SHOWN ON THE TAX
RECORDS OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION 1,
The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the
following described property, to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Eugene
Puchalski Survey, Abstract No. 996, and the A.N.B Tompkins
Survey, Abstract No. 1246, Denton County, Texas; being a part of
a certain (called) 22.20 acre tract deeded by the General
Ass+embly$& Board of Ministerial Relief of the Cumberland
Presbyterian Church to the Board of Trustees of the Cumberland
Prosbyteriv Children's Home, Inc* on the 7th day of April,
1941, rec.. ..ad in Volume 368, Page 494, Deed Records of said
County, and being more particularly described as followas ,
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said 72.20 care tract at
the intersection of the south right of way of Greenlee Street
and the west right of way of Bernard Streetr
THENCE south 01.52129' wort along the west right of way of
Bernard Street a distance of 871.01 feet to a chain link fences
THENCE south 89039145" wes's along a fence a distance of 661.49
feet to a point in tht suukh line of said 27.20 acre tract and
the southeast corner of a (called) 2.92 acre right of way tract
deeded to the State of Textia and recorded in Volume 3480 Page
390, Deed Records of Denton 1'm.nty, Texas;
THENCE north 47426100" west alviij said right of way a distance
of 658.93 f•►Ist;
THENCE north 02001106" west alon(i said right of way a distance
of 60.0 feet ho a point in the south right of way of Earl Street)
THENCE north 07458154" east along the south right of way of Earl
Street a distance of 390.96 foot to a fence corner post;
THENCE north 00409108" west along a fence and the %ast right of
way of Central Street a distance of 331.61 feet to a point in
the south right of way of Greenlee Street;
THENCE south 83418101" east along the south right of way of
Greonliia Street a distance of 787.89 foot to the point of
beginncng and containing 17.359 acres of land.
which is classified as single Family "SF-7" District Classifi-
cation Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas is heroby'ahanged and a Specific Use Permit is
hereby granted for the use of said property for expansion of the
existing children's h1me, subject to the following special
conditions and restrictions, to-wits
2, Uses a d facilities shall be limited to those
incidental or'related to the children's home and
shall conform to the approved site plan;
PAGE ONE
TIM*
77
20 Ali applicable development codes of the City of
Denton Ironing ordinanas, building permits, etc.)
shall be enforcedt and
3. The children's home use shall be limited to the
17.359 acre tract exhibitd on the approved site
plan.
in addition to all uses authorized in a single ramify "Sr-7"
District. The development of the property shall be in
substantial compliance with the site plan attached hereto and
made a part hereof for all purposes.
14thT day2oof gJanuary! 1969ci as can DAppendixe to the Cod* tof
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No.
69-1, be, and the sage is hereby amended to show such change in
District Classification and Use.
HCTION II.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of ieomoting the general welfare of the
City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
other things for the character of the district and for its
peculiar suitability of particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting' human lifts,
and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City o Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
P4910-11 U.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been hold by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the Clty ci Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the S.day of , 1983.
CI Or NTON, TEXAS
ATTEST
V
CITY Or DENTON,00TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL roams
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Or DENTONo TEXAS
SYl
i
PAO2 TWO
ei
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
S-167
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Roy E. Payne None Received
1214 Bernard
Denton, TX
Mrs. R. E. Rector
13.02 Greenlee
Denton, TX
M1~ 4 a
loo
0
/ -
0/000
L411;W -214Q1
l 70/
O)OUD
2
ti
~r
5 ~a
Y „ .~i d , ' YR ~ tY ,il"fp' ♦ ,?h~~4 4`M ~q ~ 1 ~"?j
.wn.~
^01 u
JjLLb)
15 sav
ol~oo
AL/
7 '
""-4 4UMMI
I)Aq
Y)L
,Avf1 ~
z
r
J,
n
Two, W,
SrAdAl
SDI
•
LdApj~
.~+rrr
it J-/ IL
- 0033 r
w
M w
Od
-Af
-ter
1
0 700
!5
loolf)
i
dr
P ; Z Minutes
April 23, 1946
Pale 2
devsloPMont anticipated this year. Mr. Burke said that
they plan to break ground on the utilities this year.
Mr. Claiborne asked if an old farmhouse is located on this
property. !4r. Burke said yes.
Mr. Claiborne asked how such property back to the east that
is not developable, Mr. Burke stated that there is a 12
acre band that is not developable unless channel:zed but
the owners would rather not channelise.
IN 7AVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present,
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Crum stated that a technical error in
a3vettl M was made when the site was originally annexed
in 1985 ans that on January 21, 1986, the annexation was.
again processed to most legal requirements. She said that
the Air ort Zonin Act and the Denton Municipal Airport
Zoning ~rdinance 10rdinsnce 81.1) control the uses allowed
on this property. This site is within the approach zone
of the Airport and it is situated approximately 8,50U feet
north of the northern extremity of the runway and in line
with the extended runway center line. Section 4 of the
Municipal Airport Zoning ordinance limits the height of
buildings to one foot for every 50 feet of horizontal dis-
tance. Considering that the site is 15 feet higher in el-
evation than the runway, the maximum building height to be
allowed on the site is 1SS feet. 't'he ordinance section
concerning noise would also be applicable to the use and
development of the site in the future. She also stated
that this proposal does not violate any Development Guide
policies. She said that the Planning and Zoning Commission
considered Z-1709 at its meeting on November 28, 1984 and
voted 7-0 to recommend a pprovsl subject to the applicable
provisions contained in ~he Municipal Airport Zoning
Ordinance. She added that staff recommends approval.
REBUTTAL: None offered.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Ms. Brock stated that she realized it is a tech-
nicality that this case was brought back to the Commission.
She said that she was assuming at this point that this case
could be denied by the Commission.
Mr, Morris asked for the reason why the staff brought the
zoning request back to the Commission, Mr. Ellison said a
technical error in the annexation process and that the
thinking is that if the annexation Is not valid then the
zoning is not valid, Mr. Mnrrls asked if the case went be-
fore the City Council. Mr, Ellison said yes. Mr. Morris
said that the commission can take any action they desire.
Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of Z-17U9, Seconded
py Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (6-0).
B. 167, Petition of the Cumberland Presbyterian Children's
Me requesting an amendment to specific Use Permit
(5-167), The property is located at the southwest corner
of Bernard and Greenlee streets and is further described
as 1304 Bernard Street, Lot 1 Block 1, of the Cumberland
Presbyterian Children's home kdditloa for a total of 17,317
acres, If the request is approved the amendment will al-
low the construction of an Activities building that is not
included on the original sits plan.
p ; L Minutes
April 23, 1946
page 3
Twenty-three notices were sailed to property owners within
200 feet; one reply form was received in favor, no reply
forms were received In opposition.
PETITIONER: Greg Edwards, Metcoplex Engineering Corpors-
on, sa that there are two differences from original
site plan:
1) Activity center has been relocated, and
2) A future cottage has been added.
He sold that the Commission has seen the go plat
and approved it. He said that they will be processing the
final plat.
Mr. Claiborne asked if this building will be replacing the
ball field. Mr. Edwards said yes.
Mr. Juren asked if the activities buitdin is the same size
as the first one that was proposed. Mr. Idwards said yes.
Mr. Juren asked about the nature of the cottage,
Mr. Edwards said the staff necessary for expansion of the
facilities will use the cottage.
Mr. Juren asked why they felt It was necessary to move the
building. Mr. Bdwards said because of drainage considera-
tions in the old location.
Ms. Brock asked if there would be a change in activities
or number of children involved. Mr. Edwards said no.
James Gilbert, Administrator, asked if the sidewalk
issue is resolved and if not is a sidewalk required.
Mr. Claiborne said that sidewalks will be required on
Greenlee and Bernard unless the Commission decides to
omit the requirement, Mr. Gilbert said that existing
sidewalks are located on the corner of Greenlee and
n,rnard Streets. He said that there is a sidewalk on
the east side of Bernard Street in front of Kamsgate
Apartments, He said that when one leaves the sidewalk
on Greenlee there are only residences.
Mr. Ellison asked if there are sidewalks on their side of
Bernard and Greenlee. Mr. Gilbert said no. Mr, Ellison
stated that staff is recommending sidewalks, Mr. Gilbert
stated that he ob}ects to sidewalks. He said that they
,have sufficient sidewalks internally for the children to
ride bikes, skate, and other various activities. He -aid
that they have sidewalks on Bernard where it is not fenced
in and do not see building more sidewalks will benefit.
Mr. Claiborne stated that the proposed activity building
is some distance away and asked if the children are
proposed to be walking on the streets or parking lots.
Mr. Gilbert stated that they have no inside traffic and
could foresee no hazard.
Mr. Pearson asked for an explanation on the moving of the
building. Mr. Gilbert stated that they were too congested
where the building was originally proposed. He said that
they needod more open space. He said that the ball field
has been moved to the left of the proposed building.
Mr, Pearson asked if the building is strictly for the use
of the home. Mr. Gilbert said that occasionally groups use
their facilities. He said that they will have an addition-
al staff Verson to be In charge of recreation. He said
that their present gym is not idequate.
,t. 4^r -`'.-.,'y~,,'.'' t a ;,y _:,,1•.pt
P a Z Minutes
April 23, 1966
Page 4
Mr. Ellison asked that they not show the service drive on
the plat. 11r. Gilbert stated that at one time they had two
en rances into their can us for be ter flow of traffic. He
so d that he can see no lrealon to orfett the drive.
IN FAVOR: Ron Arrington stated that a definite need exists
for a new gyrt facility. He said that he sees sidewalks as
an extra and that the money could be better spent In other
areas to benefit the children,
OPPOSED; None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms, Paster stated that the Cumberland
Fro yto Children's Home is a legal non-conforming
institutional use that has existed at its present address,
1304 Bernard Street, since 1939, The Children's Home is
classified as an institution of religious or philanthropic
nature by the current City of Denton Zoning Ordinance and
a specific use permit was approved in 1983. Sho said that
the request is for an amendment of S-167 to allow the con-
struction of a recreational building. The scale and scope
of the proposed structure appears to bo reasonable. She
said that the Development Review Committee has reviewed the
site plan and setbacks are adequate, She said that this
area is over based on current zoning, She said that while
staff cannot recommend approval of this request, due to the
violation of the intensity standard, the Planning and Zon-
ing Commission may wish to consider this request as benefi-
cial to the City of Denton. She added if the Commission is
inclined to approve that several conditions are recommended
by staff.
Mr. Clark stated that the reason staff suggested sidewalks
is because of the school type atmosphere. He said that ne
did not hzve a problem with the service drive but that the
drive muss; conform with the subdivision regulations.
Ms. Brock asked if there is adequate access for fire
vehicles. Mr Clark said yes.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Gilbert stated that he was having a hard
t m+fe understand'nq all the rules and regulations and that
they seem to change every time a new building or change is
proposed.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
UECiS1ON: Mr, Buren moved to recomend approval of S-10
wwit following conditions;
1. Uses and facilities shall be limited to those Inciden-
tal or related to the Children's Home and shall conform
to the approved site plan.
2. All applicable development codes of the City of Der;ton
(zoning ordinance, building parmlts, etc.) shall be
enforced.
3. The Children's Home use shall be limited to the 17.359
acre tract exhibited on the approved site plan,
Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6-U).
C. H-35. Petition of Mr, and Mrs. Ken Bradley requesting
TI-storic landmark (H) designation at SUS 9olivar Street.
The property is further described as all of lots 4 and 5
and part of lot 3, block 4, of the Bacon Addition.
Twenty-two notices were mailed to property owners within
200 feet; no reply form.i were received In favor, three
reply forms were received in opposition,
is
' Was
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT GRANTED UNDER
ORDINANCE N0. 83-36 TO PROVIDE FOR A, REVISED SITE PLAN,, AS SAID
PERMIT AND PLAN APPLY TO 17,359 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BERNARD AND GREENLEE STREETS; PROVIDING FOR A
PE}:4LTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000,00 FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That Ordinance No, 83.36, approved on April 5, 1983, providin
for a specific use permit for a children's home on 17,359 acres of
land ^i described therein, is amended by adoption a revised site
plan therefore, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated
herein by reference, so that hereafter the development and use of
the property shall be subject to the revised site plan.
SGCTION II.
That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance
No. 83-36, showing the amendment herein wade,
SECTION III.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance.
or a provision of Ordinance No. 83-36, incorporated herein by
reference, or fails to comply therewith or w1th any of the
requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued
thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine
not exceeding One Thousand Dollars (51,000.00), Each such person
shall be deemed uilty of a separate offense for each and every
day or portion t ereof during which any violation of this ordi-
nance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such
violations such person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION IV.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the city of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the data of
Irs passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
50LOTTE ALLEN CITY SIGRETMEY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL POW
DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: nA\ r~eCt
~ti
rz.
I
I I _ .
~ Ir try, t I ~ r/~r
41
F ~ y I
r_
4m YM
f i
r
i
~ ? 'rw .434 x°4'a?'+..`°~i 'w ~p-. "r ..tea i ~ e r.. ~s~ra r rW .$yaryrr+ M m;r p?. m
DATE: June 3. 1 W6
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: "L-1709
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this
request at its meeting of April 23, 1986 and it was
approved with conditions.
SUMMAV : This is a request for a change in zoning from
agricultural to office district on a 5 acre tract
situated west of and abutting Masch Branch (toad
and north of U. S. Highway 380 (University Drive).
BACKGROUND: A technical error in advertising was made when the
site was originally annexed in 1985. On January 21,
1986 the annexation was again processed to meet legal
requirements.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicatfle
FISCAL IMPACT: There 1s no impact on the general fund.
Resp ull~u d: iCity Manager
Pr a by:
c rum
Planning Assis ant
Appr e
Jef Me
Director of Planning
and Development
. it } ly,{ u' Gk a ,L .'+k
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1709 Meeting Date: Tune 3, 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Burke Engineering
For Tri-Steel Structures
1400 Crescent, Denton, Texas 76201
Status of Applicant: Owner - Developer
Requested Action: Establish zoning as office district
(0) classification
Location and Size: A tract of 5.00 acres situated west
of and abutting Masch Branch Road and
North of US Hwy 380 (University Drive)
Surrounding Land Use
and zoning: North - Vacant, agriculture; A
South - Vacant, agriculture; A
East - Vacant, agriculture; A
West - Vacant, agriculture; A
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: The site abuts Masch Branch Road
recommended for 60 foot right-of-way
width (collector street) which
connects to US 380 (University
Drive). Perimeter street paving
regulations are applicable to Masch
Branch Road. No access will be
permitted from Highway 380.
Sidewalks will be required as per
subdivision regulations.
4' z'r ,..?Prr3' ' i
pr'r, .fi : 1:.n "v r r' }a 4 r n^'7~.Xa'tr` r' °t'3 f-._ a ._'.1 # 71TV7~ 7M
(Case t Z-1709)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Utilities: There is need for a 12' diameter
water line and a 10` diameter
sanitary sewer line to be extended
across the frontage of the property
and connect to existing facilities at
Ranch Estates (approximately 10680
feet).
The required water flow for fire
protection is 11500 GPM, and 2,477
GPM is available. Fire hydrants will
be required every 300 feet. Telephone
and electric services are available,
Drainage: The western part of the site falls
within the flood plain, FEMA regula-
tions will be applicable to drainage
improvements. An improved channel
will be needed on this site.
H T' 'CORY
A technical error in advertising was made when the site was
originally annexed in 1985. On January 21, 1986, the annexation
was again processed to meet legal requirements.
ANALYSIS
The use and development of this site will need to satisfy the
requirements of the Denton Development Guide and the Denton
Municipal Airport Ordinance. (Ordinance 81-1)
According to the Development Guide, this site falls within a low
intensity area. The primary purpose of a low intensity area is
to provide for overall land use/transportation balance by con-
trolling the density and intensity to 75 trips/day/gross acre.
Development in these areas, therefore, emphasizes residential
uses. At the same time, however, diversification of land uses
is encouraged but limited to the following conditions:
1. Strict site plan control within one block of existing low
density residential areas (development should maintain
character of area, architectural, landscaping, etc.) At
this time, there is no low density housing within one block
of the bite.
a.
P~° w e .rvm'~?- .3'-:: "H.';. '3.".Y" ~.;°+~a: 3r ~ x ~a y e FT,e ,•a ,ks cn.sv r
(Case # Z-1709)
page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
2. Traffic planning insures access by collector street or
larger and not through local low density streets. The site
abuts Masch Branch Road, which connects to US Hwy. 380, a
primary major arterial.
3. The overall density/intensity standard is not violated.
Most of the land in this low intensity area is currently
zoned agriculture (A)l however, office development on this
site will generato a moderate 1,750 intensity units.
4. Sufficient green space, recreational facilities and
diversity of parks are provided. This condition is not
applicable to office zoning.
The Development Guide also restricts o,Efice/retail type of
development to 4 acres or 2,600 intensity units. The limit of 4
acres applies directly to retail uses which generate 650 t/d/ac
yielding an intensity unit of 2,600 t/d/ac. Office development,
however, will generate 350 t/d/ac which in this case will result
in an intensity unit of 1,750 t/d/ac. The proposed office dis-
trict (0) classification of this site is, therefore, compatible
with the policies of the Denton Development Guide.
The site is located within the "controlled area" as defined by
the Airport Zoning Act and the use and development of land in
this area is regulated by the Denton Municipal Airport Zoning
Ordinance.
The site is within the approach zone of the Airport and it is
situated approximately 8,500 feet north of the northern extrem-
ity of the runway and in line with the extended runway center
line. Section 4 of the Municipal Airport Zoning Ordinance
limits the height of buildings to one foot for every 50 feet
of norizontal distance. Considering that the site i., 15 feet
higher in elevation than the runway, the maximum building height
to be allowed on the site is 155 Feet. Section 7 of the ordi-
nance would also be applicable to the use and development of the
site in the future,
.4
"7 t"
(Came # Z-1709)
Page Four
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission reconsidered 2-1709 at its
meeting on April 23, 1986 and voted 6-0 to recommend approval.
The following provisions contained in the Municipal Airport
Zoning Regulations (ordinance 81-1) are applicable:
1. Buildings on the site shall not exceed two stories in
building height.
2. The provisions contained in Section 5 of the Municipal
Airport Zoning Ordinance (ordinance 81--1) ars applicable
to the future development, and use of the sii,e.
3. The owner of the site and/or buildings and appurtenances
in question will allow the City to install, operate, and
maintain at the expense of the City of Denton such markings
and lights a3 may be necessary.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map
2. Property owners list
3. Reply form # ; J.s , <t....,.
4. Planning anc~ 1onfng Commission minutes of April 23, 1986
0952a
MW M
4
f ,
1
_ I 1
` A F
SF
SF
-34
SF• 7
I '
ZOO 17
,6R
PD-13 r.•.:----
MOM"• I 11
PD-84 I 11
• 1
Ll C
1
1
C ' Il
A 1
i 1
1
1
• L l
\ 11111
1
0-85 i
L l
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1709
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
John F. Brown None Received
Route 1, Box 362E
Denton, TX
Billie Barry and
Myron Borth
P.O. Box 38
Krum, TX
i
5 ~
t
Z
-A51i Z-4
AOt
1
I Xgmg
•
217 A&Mjl/
r ~rr
L13w) /1, 4
71gj~l
Minutes
planning and Zoning Commission
April 23, 1986
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Comoission of the City
of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, April 23, 1986, at S:00 p.m.,
in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Euline Brock, Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr.,
Gary Juren and Tom Pearson
Absent: None
Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey,
Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Taryon Paster,
Planning Technician; Stacey Crum, Administrative Intern;
Martha Fujauski, Administrative Intern; Joe Morris, Assis-
tant City Attorney; Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and
Recreation; David Ham, Assistant Director of Utilities;
Jerry Clark, City Engineer; and Susan Mitchell, Secretary
1. MINUTES
A. It was moved by Ms. Brock, seconded by its. Cole and
unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the minutes of the
)oint study session of the Planning and Zonin Commission
and the Parks and Recreation Board on March It, 1986.
B. It was mnved by Mr. Juren, seconded by Mr. Escue and
unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of March 16, 1986,
C. It was moved by Mr. Juren, seconded by Ms. Brock and
unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of April 9, 1986.
11. CONSENT AGENDA: tt was moved by Mr. Juren, seconded by
s. Cole an unanimously carried (6-:)) to approve the consent
agenda as follows:
A. Approval of vacation of the Business Center 188 Addition,
Phase 1.
B. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the LISD-Farris
Road Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
C. Approval of amended plat of Lhe Med-Tex Subdivision,
Section 11, Lot 3, Block A.
111. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A, r Z 1709. Petition of durke Engineering, representing Tri-
5 e I-Structures, requesting a change In zoninj from the
agricultural (A) classification to the office `0) classifi-
cation. The tract is five (S) acres of land situated west
of and abutting March Branch Road and north of U.S Highway
380 and more fully described as lot 1, block 1, Tri-Steel
Headquarters Addition. If the zoning change is approved,
the property may be utilized for any land use permitted in
the office (0) classification by the City of Lanton Zoning
Ordinance.
Seven notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were rec:aived in favor or opposition.
PETITIONER: Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, stated that
t 5e p`urpose is to allow them to extend city utilities at
their expense, plat the property and build an office
building for the Tri-Steel headquarters..
Mr. Ellison asked if there is any development now.
Mr. Burke said no. Mr. Ellison asked if there is any
v
fiC+ l~+£ ' .'I PR R t k°'•'a R } ? i c?a
yea}'
p 1 Z minutes
April 230 1946
Pap 2
development anticipated this year. Mr. Burke said that
they plan to break ground on the utilities this year.
Mr. Claiborne asked if an old farmhouse is located on this
property. Mr. Burke said yes,
Mr. Claiborne asked how much property back to the east that
is not developable. Mr. Burke $toted that there is a 12
acre bend that is not developable unless channelized but
the ownnrs would rather not channelize.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: As. Crum stated that technical error in
a vert"TsTn`was made when the site was originally annexed
in 1985 an that on January 21, 1966, t,,e annexation was
again processed to most legal requirements. the said that
the Airport Zonin Act and the D nton Municipal Airport
Zoning Ordinance Ordinance 61.1) control the uses allowed
on this property. This site is within the approach zone
of the Airport and it is situated approximately s,SOO feet
north of the northern extremity of the runway and in line
with the extended runway center line. Section 4 of the
Municipal Airport Zoning Ordinance limits the height of
buildings to one foot for every SO feet of horizontal dis-
tance. Considering that the site is 1S feet higher in el-
evation than the runway, the maximum building height to be
allowed on the site is lSS fftet. The ordinanr:- section
concerning noise would also b• applicable to the use and
development of the site in the future. She also stated
that this proposal does not violate any Development Guide
policies. She said that the planning and Zoning Commission
considered 2.1709 at its meeting on November 28, 1964 and
voted 7.0 to recommend appProval subject to tho applicable
provisions contained I. the Municipal Airport Zoning
Ordinance. She added that staff recommends approval.
REBUTTAL: None offered.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION; Ms. Brock stated that she realized it is a tech-
nicality that this case was brougght back to the Commission,
She satd that she was assuming aE tnis point that this case
could be denied by the Commission.
Mr. Morris asked for the reason wny the staff brought the
zoning request back to the Commission. Mr. Ellison said a
technical error in the annexation process and that the
thinking is that if t'ie annexation is not valid then the
zoning is not valid. Mr. Morris asked if the case went be-
fore the City Council. Mr. Ellison said yes, Mr. Morris
said that the Commission can take any action they desire.
Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of Z-1709. Seconded
by Mr. Escuo and unanimously carried (6.0).
B. S•167. Petition of the Cumberland Presbyterian Children's
go-We-requesting an amendment to Specific Use Permit
(S»167). The property is located at the southwest corner
of Bernard and Greenlee streets and Ls further described
as 1304 Bernard Street, Lot 1, Block 1, of the Cumberland
Presbyterian Children's Homo Addition for a total of 17,31"
acres. If the request is approved the amendment will al-
low the construction of an ct vlt es building that is not
included on the ori=tnal site plan.
{ 1047E
r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
' TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1,
AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 5.00 ACRES OF LAND
SITUATED WEST OF AND ABUTTING MASCH BRANCH ROAD AND NORTH OF U.
S. HIGHWAY 380, AND MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 19 BLOCX 1,
TRI-STEEL HEADQUARTERS ADDITION; TO PROVIDE_ FOR AN OFFICE 110"
DISTRICT ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR SAID
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS!
SECTION I.
That an Office "G" District Zoning Classification and Use
designation is hereby established for all of the property
described below under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Denton, Texast
All that certain tract of land situated in the S. Huizar Survey
Abstract No. S14, Denton County, Taxes, and being a part of the
called 69.198 acre tract described in the deed from Lorene
Sheppard Darrow, at al to John P. Brown recorded in Volume 1092,
Page 748 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said
tract being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described
herein, at an iron rod set in the east line of the said Brawn
Tract south 0102301810 east a distance of SSS.7 feet from the
northeast corner thereof and being in the west line of Masch
Branch Road;
THENCE south 01.13118" east with the east line of the said Brown
Tract and the west line of Masch Branch Road a distance of
406.26 feet to an iron rod set for the southeast corner of the
herein described tract;
THENCE south 88°36124" west across the said grown Tract, passing
at 541,84 feet to an Iron rod set on the east bank of a dry
branch and continuing along the same course, in all, a total
distance of 569.68 feet to a point in the centerline of the said
branch for the southwest corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE northerly up the said dry branch the following south
meander calls:
1. North S1007111" west a distance of 144.35 feet;
2. North 20157102" east a distance of 132.88 feet;
3. North 8748154" east a distance of 106,69 feat;
4. North S6616135" east a distance of 178.40 feet;
S, North 12054108" west a distance of 9S.07 feet;
to a point for the northwest corner of the herein described
tract;
THENCE north 88°36124" east leaving the said dry branch, and
passing at 34.0 feet, an iron rod set on the bank thereof and
continuing along the sane course, in all, a total distance of
390.89 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 5.040 acres
of land.
SECTION II.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under ordinance No.
69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such District
Classification and Use.
SECTION III.
That the City Council of the City of Denton. Texar, hereby
finds that such zoning is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonahle consideration, among
other things for the character of the district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and oncouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTIGN IV,
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
Immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been hold by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE , SECRETARY
CITY CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.
'YYl ~
Z-17091PAGE 2
ra,a'
Mumma
af°?5~n iy°$¢v,aC+7y+.r'r g nq•'FS:; ''-T Y, r ,S
VATSs 6/3/66
CITY C2"CIL RNPORT .FORMAT
~ f
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUW9CT: Public Hearing for Zoning Case Z-1798
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of April 23, 1986 and voted to recommend approval of 2-1798
by a vote of 6-0.
SUMMARY:
This is a request to amend An existing 14 acre planned development
located Along the east side of Riney Road, adjacent and south of
Highway 77 and north of Windsor Drive at a point approximately
220 feet east of the intersection of Riney Road and Windsor Driva.
Thirty-one single family detached lots (SP-7) and a 38,000 square
foot retirement/recovery center are permitted in the planned
development.
BACKGROUNDS
This request would eliminate 22 of the single family lots and
replace them with a 5.8 acre church site. While approval of the
amendment would not violate the intensity standard for this low
intensity area, it would double the intensity on this tract.
PROGRAMS. DEEMTMENT$ OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
R a tf mitt
L1 d Harrell
Prepared by: city Manager 7
Denise Spivey
Urban Planner
Approv
77eff Meyer-
Director of Planning
and Development
0171k
rv arfi ,
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1798 Meeting Date: June 3, 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Ana Pena
4300 Valley Crest
Arlington, TX 76010
Stttus of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Amendment of an existing planned
development.
Locat{.on and Size: 14.07 acre parcel located along the
east side of Riney Road, adjacent and
south of Highway 77 and north of
Windsor Drive at a point approximate)
220 feat east of the intersection of
Riney Road and Windsor Drive.
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family; SF-16, A
South - Single family; SF-71 SF'-10
East - Single family, vacant; A
West - Single famil~, park,
Y.M.C.A.;
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: The entire planned development has
approximately 1,700 feet of frontage
along Riney Road, an unimproved
collector. The proposed church site
has 471 feet of frontage along Riney
Road. The developer must dedicate
appropriate right-of-way and provide
pavement, curb, and gutter
improvements to one-half of Riney
Road. Access for the church lot must
s , RMV.i °r e~'" r, 7aj:;,~, .T wey •e. ?L r+w,. Ye" ?S. F t? sfi' .:s*;
(case a-1798)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
comply with subdivision rules and
regulations concerning width and
spacing of driveways on collector
streets.
Utilities: Adequate electrical, telephone, and
gas service is available for
extension to this site. There is a
16" water line in Riney Road on the
west side of this tract and a 6"
water line in Highway 77. There is
an 8" sanitary sewer in Highway 77
along the northern boundary of the
planned development.
Drainage: Drainage is a major consideration for
the entire planned development. The
approved plan can be designed
satisfactorily if adequate green
space and other on-site facilities
are properly designed. Detention
will be required on the southern part
of the property. Culverts will be
required under Riney Road to carry
water to the west.
HISTORY
The city council denied a request for a change in zoning from
the agricultural to the planned development classification for
118 multi-family and 41 two-family units on this site in May of
1983. The City Council also denied a request for a change from
agricultural to planned development for single family housing
(15 lots with a typical size of 80' x 1101), single family
attached (townhomes - 56 units), and duplexes (13 lots with 26
units) in February of 1984. Considerable opposition from the
Northridge community appeared to be a factor in the Council's
decisions. In May of 1985, the City Council approved a request
for a change from agricultural to planned development that
permitted 31 single family detached lots (SF-7) and a three
story, 38,000 square foot retirement/recovery center.
1
St `r.~su, r"i ~
(Case Z-1790)
Page Three
ANALYSIS
This property is located in a low intensity area. The Denton
Aevelopme,it Guide designates these low intensity areas as thQ
primary residential areas of the City. Thirty-one (31) single
family detached lots are provided in the approved planned
development. It the amendment is approved, twenty-two (22) of
these lots would be eliminated and replaced by a 5.8 acre church
site. A comparison of traffic generation figures rec•eals that
single family detached (SF-7) land use generates 47 trips per
day per gross acre, while a church land urge generates 85 trips
pec day per gross acre. While approval of' the amendment would
not violate the intensity standard, it would almost double the
intensity for this tract.
In addition to intensity, neighborhood input is the crucial
issue in this request, The history section of this report
reveals that neighborhood opposition was a determining factor in
the two earlier zoning requests that were denied. After many
months of meetings the developer and the ne~!.ghborhood reached an
acceptable compromise. Some neic~,borhood residents have asked
if there is a limit on the number of times a neighborhood is
expected to defend against zoning that is perceived as a
potential detriment to the character of its area. A landowner
or a prospective developer has the right to request a change in
zoning so long as policies and procedures of the City of Denton
are followed and permit them to do so.
Another area of concern is the improvement of Riney Road
guaranteed by the original planned development. The approved
ordinance contains the following conditions "The developer
shall dedicate appropriate right-of-way and p; wide necessary
off-site street and d►:ainage improvements along half of Riney
Road from Windsor Drive to the beginning of the proposed new
alignment of Riney Road, The developer will be zequired to pay
the total cost for that section of Riney Road within the
development. Existing Riney Road shall become a cul-de-sac at
its northern terminus to prevent direct access onto Highway 77.
Plans for installation of the cul-de-sac are required at the
time of plattinV. Actual cul-de-sac must be installed when
initial development, occurs." The Planning and Caning Commission
has recommended that this condition as well as all conditions of
the original ordinance be incorporated into the amended planned
development.
i
1
(Case z-1798)
Page Pour
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its'
meeting of April 23, 1986 and voted to recommend approval of
Z-1798 by a vote of 6-0 with the condition that all conditions
or the original planned development will be incorporated into
the amendment.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Proposed Amended Site Plan
3. Appr;;,ved Site Plan
4. Approved Planned Development Ordinance
5. Reply Form Totals
6. Property Owner List
7. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of April 23, 1986
0137o
i~
LI t
I
~ I
i
y I
1 , a I
t
I; RINEY ROAD
j ( PD.$
S 13y I~ k
-1798
1 I
DSOR
KNOW ram*
1\ w •ti
1
1, if f Locrr ~+ur MM L wlYi~sportrar n %AmpV* o 40
S ' / h. .G I" V TW TaWi eft AKiOInN
mw#A % k11LplNo rcOOR ,A11II~(A IN
!D~` • SOT 4. B OBI{ A 7NALL MOt CNCCED
LOT 7
►r 1117 R bum 0
a~
w
2~ M10[
~~r fl if •
1 I /
/ '.II MrK11lRAlf 704E
I
1748
I 1 / I ~ N
O/rlfrL M'M O4 ! . _IIMM ' I / / I ^ M
i I '•e f'
unc us ' N narfll•.r wAe
!.o OR / 1 AfORTNRILAE HE""
I / I + CAUD II,700 AM
/ M.N.6ww'Nmema *Rwv 4kd
/ b tITV II ewwv OF pew?"' mm.
trx..•"I
I
. ~ f /SL/oc~ ALL-- J1.
Inv
(f►li r•' r
~ 7- I afrt
MMIk c riff. AM{'~
1 1t aSllt _ nrtad►M .
I ~ MIAIA ►!W fa.ffl• 1•w•N •n•tw lflt
- w,.,•... •:r,dp AdrflR dlfl .wp w.
A A-Md1Mr7 7MwW w ow^ 1N,
r • Mx' ussm r~♦
Anew f ~c1~1
1 w ~
• \
00
BLOCK ♦ ; Q
J ♦
* \ ; 1 EMT 4 1 CE \
wrf a~
'pr f
N 1
I •
,I le H p
I '
~ o
~ I
&L J"p
~ I 1
r rr . rr
r 7 •l, ♦
r
f I - ~y. Re ~
~4 ~ I
1135L
NO. -1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DEN:-V TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORD11; .gCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND
AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 14.06 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ALONG THE EAST
SIDE OF RINEY ROAD, ADJACENT AND SOUTH OF U.1 S. HIGHWAY 77, AND
FEEETMEAST OFWINDSOR
THE INTERALCTIONAOF POINT
RINEY BKpAD AND WINPROXIMATELY DSOR DRIVE, 220
IS MORE PARTICULARLY UESCRIBED °EREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN
ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICA-
CLASSIFICATION A
IAND USE DEIGNAION;NPROVIDING PFOR At1PENALTY INC
MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TLrXAS9 HEREBY ORDAINS:
9ICT1014 1,
That the zoning classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-wit:
'rKACT 1: All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the
97-T -Reisenheimer Survey, Abstract 610, Denton County, Texas,
beinb all of a certain tract described in a deed from C. C. Smith,
at ux, to horacio Pena, at al, on the 12th day of October, 1976,
and recorded in Volume 808, Page 920, deed Records of said County,
and being more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at the northeast corner rnf said Pena Tract at a steel
gin
pin at a fence corner on the south boundary Line of U. S. Highway
THENCE south along and near a fence on the east boundary line of
said Pena Tract a distanco of 804.83 feet to an iron pin at a
fence corner at the northeast corner of a tract described in a
deed from Cleora Parker to Melvin R. Da"e on the 27th day of June,
1964 and recorded in Volume 511, Page 596, Deed Records of Denton
County, Texas;
THENCE south 89°17'06" wust with the north boundary line of said
Dane Tract a distance of 196.0 feet to an iron pin at a fence
corner at the northwest corner of said Dane Tract;
THENCE south 0°01'47" west with the west boundary line of said
Dane Tract along and near a fence a distance of 318.5 feet zo an
iron pin in the middle of Old Sanger Road at the southwest corner
of said Dane Tract;
THENCE south !17°40'26" west with the middle of Old Sanger Road a
distance of 42.88 feet to a found iron pin at the southeast corner
of a tract described in a deed from Grady R. HcEuin, Jr., at ux to
J. A. Miller and recorded in Volume 921, Page 485, Deed Records;
THENCE north 0°10'56" east with the east boundary line of saia
Ailler Road a distance of A17.97 fast to a found iron pin at the
northeast corner of said Miller tract;
THENCE south 89°53'45" west with the north boundary line of said
Miller tract a distance of 109.96 feet to a fence corner post at
the southeast corner of a tract described in a deed from Patrick
E.4 Parker and recorded in Volume 667, Page 591, Deed Records of
Denton County, Texas;
77
fir
THENCE north 0'49'10" west with a fence on the east boundary line
of said Parker Tract a distan%:e of 98.28 feet to a feces corner
post;
THENCE mouth 88°53'29" vast with a fence on the north boundary
line of said Parker tract a distance of 139.20 feet to.an iron pin
in the middle of Riney Road;
THENCE north 81°26'52" west with the middle of Riney Road a
distance of 659.95 feet to an iron pin at an angle point in said
road;
THENCE north 27°1.3'51" west with the middle of Riney Road a
distance of 544.54 feet tj an iron pin;
THENCE north 48°17'27" east a distance of 24.73 feet to a found
iron pin at the southwest corner of i tract described in a deed
from Robert J. Moon, at ux to Charles Melvin Cunningham and
recorded in Volume 632, Page 217, Dead Records of Denton County,
Texas;
THENCE nor.;h 48`17'27" east with the southeast boundary line of
said Cunningham Tract a distance of 274.94 feet to a found iron
pin at the southeast eornor of said Cunningham Tract on the south
right-of-way of U. S. Highway 77;
THENCE south 59°34'29" east with the south right-of-way of U. S.
Highway 77 a distance of 251.25 fast to a found iron pin;
THENCE south 58°50'46" aast with the south boundary line ofoU. S.
Highway 77 a distance of 454.97 feet to the point of beginning
containing in all 14.0734 acres of land.
TRACT II. BEGINNING at a steel pin in an old fence corner at the
intersection of the east boundaryy line of Riney Road and the south
boundary line of U. S. Highway 77;
THENCF south 59°22147" east w{th the south right-of-way of U, S.
Highway 77 a distance of 239.72 feet to a found iron pin at the
northeast corner of a tract described in a deed from Robert J.
Moon, at ux to Charlie Melvin Cunninggham, at ux and recorded in
Voluwa 632, Page 217, Dead Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE; south 47°09'33" west with the nort+i boundary line of said
Cunningham Tract a distance of L26.37 feet to a found steel pin at
the northwest corner of said Cunningham Tract on the east boundary
line of Riney Road;
THENCE north 28°38'43" west with the eaut boundary line o1! Riney
Road a distance of 237.04 fast to the point of beginning,
containing in all 0.3333 acre of land,
is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification
and Uea designation to Planned Development "PD" District
Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning
ordinance oft the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION 11.
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of any building within the planned development district,, the
following conditions stall be met;
1. The overall density level of the entire tract shall not ex.ead
7.9 units par acre,
2. The retirement/recovery center shall be limited to 80 units,
3. The developer shall dedicate appropriate ri ht-of-way and
provide necasemrv off-site street and drainage prove"ots in
accordance with' City of Denton requirements along half of
Riney Road from Windsor Drive to the beginning of the proposed
,
l,NA/ PA4iE 2
R A ,a
new alignment of liiney Road. The dwelop4r will be required
to pay total coat for that section of Riney Rod within the
devclopaont (no city participation in oversising).
4. All singla family detached lots shall be a minimum of 9,000
square feet in size.
5. A six foot solid wood fence shall be erected along the
southern boundary of the retirement/recovery center tract.
6. Care of alcoholic or narcotic patients is prohibited.
7. The use of the building designated as "retirement/recovery
center on the concept plan will be limited to providing
lodging, meals, and nursing care for ill or elderly persons
only.
S. If the single family e.gellings are two-story, no windows on
the second floor will face existing developed property.
9. The Single family dwellings and retirement center shall be of
masonry construction.
10. When the property is subdivided and developed, drainage will
not be allowed to flow across the north line of the Dane
property.
11. All dwellings shall be a minimum of 1,600 square feet in size.
12. Existing Riney !toad shall become a cul-de-sac at its northern
terminus to prevent direct access onto Highway 77. Plans for
installation of cul-de-sac are required at time of platting.
Actual cul-de-sac must be installed when initial development
occurs.
SECTION III,
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made a part
hereof for all purposes.
day ofe JaZoning nuary, Map of
aseaniAppendixDenton, the Texas, Code of. Ordinances 14th of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, as
amended, is c,Qrsby amended to show such change in District
Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and
specifications.
4ECTION IV.
findshthathsuchichangenislinfa athe City of ccordance with Denton, a compreTeas hensive eplan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the cnaracter of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to t
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or
fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof,
or of a permit or certificate issued tnereunderJ shall ba guilty
of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand
Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person snall be deemed guilty of a
separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during
which any violation of this ordinanoa is committed, or continued,
and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be
punished within the limits above.
Z-1730/ANA ROCCA PEW PACE 3
-Wrl"T'r-, 117 _1177-
T,
SECTION VI.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its paasals, and the City Secretary is hereby di-
rected to cause the caps on of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton OAcord-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) lays of the date of its
passaso, 74.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985.
' v
;r1uWv Q)45TEWMW7v. ijkY
CIr OF D. ESTONO TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: ,
DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Z-1130/,ANA ROCCA P'E;NA/P^46. 4
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1798
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Chiping Lee Grady R. McEvl.n, Jr.
3100 Donna 1804 Linden
Denton, TX Denton, TX
Ralph Cordray L. 0. Maxwell
1509 Riney 706 Northridge
Denton, TX Denton, TX
E. Deats Headlee
418 Magnolia
Denton, TX
r
i
I
2
o~G Q'7Zo6 wo
ZIA
b ~
.6
41
A-C
f
r
i~
Qloo
' L-
i
3 x ~baa/
-Tp
O-r
411 Aj
.a
a'?n, s z,~r[i•Tl ,-5 .r rs ..e ..t r ^z.r^,s
I-
r~
s
/
r 0
Ahwi
l
DIY
P 4 Z Ninut('f
April 23, 1916
Page 5
PETITIUNER: Ken Bradley, 805 Bolivar Street, stated that
his fio`use is built on the site of the former Egan Farm, a
working farm located in what is now downtown Denton. He
said that this land belonged to Denton County Sheriff Egan
and was the site of the first permanent building ever built
in Denton County. He said that a summer house now stands
at that exact location. He said that history says that
Sheriff Egan was a personal friend of outlaw Sam bass, and
that Bass often visited Egan, HR said that the property
was purchased by Mr, and Mrs. David Barrow, a local
Chevrolet dealer, who served on the City Council and
School Board. He also was president of the Chamber of Com-
merce. He said that the existing house was built by Clyde
Carpenter in 1940 and several prominent citizens helped
with the house, He said that the house is heated by a
steam boiler and there is hardwood throughout the house of
which some was from the property. He said that the nouse
was once known to be a Denton showplace as a site for wed-
dings and parties. He said that it is a total point of the
neighborhood and is referred to as "the big house on the
corner", He Said that he was surprised that three people
were in opposition.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that lot 8, 703 Bolivar,
s a rev ously approved landmark, Ms. Spivey stated that
Article 28 A-1 of the City of Lenton Zoning ordinance de-
fines a historic landmark as any building, structure, site,
district, area of architectural, historical, archeological
or cult,3ral importance or value, which the City Council de-
termines shall be Protected, enhanced, and preserved in the
interest of the culture, prosperity, education and general
welfare of the people. She said that the Historic Landmark
Commission recommended approval of H-35 by a vote of 9-0 at
its meeting of March IU, 198o and felt that the property
and structure met seven of the criteria for historical (H)
zoning designation.
Mr. Claiborne asked if the external facade had been left
intact, Ms. Spivey said yes.
Mr. Juren asked if the documents required by Historic
Landmark Commision had been satisfied, Ms. Spivey said
yes and added that she believed that based on the reply of
one person in opposition she feat the individual had been
misinformed about historic designation.
REBUTTAL: None offered,
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION; Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval of
1;-35.-seconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried
(b-0),
U. x2.1798. Petition of Ana Yens requesting an amendment to
an existing 14,US7 acre planned development located on the
east side of Riney Road adjacent and south of U,S. Highway
77 and north of Windsor Drive at a point approximately 2Z0
feet east of the intersection at' Riney Road and Windsor
Drive, The current planned development permits the devel-
opment of thirty one (31) singgle family dwellings and one
retirement/recovery center, The roposed amendment would
permit the development of a church on a 5.8 acre portion
of the single family site.
P 4 Z minutes
April 23, 1966
Page 6
Twenty-three notices were mailed to property owners within
200 feet; three reply forms were received in favor, two
reply formi were received in opposition, one reply form
was received undecided,
PETITIONER: Greg Edwards, Metroplex Engineering Corpora-
l on-I nj stated that basically it was not the intent of the
petitioner to change the whole planned development. He
said that original planned development included a S.8 acre
area with 22 lots for sinaia family use. He said that they
are revising the 22 lots Into one lot so that the Seventh
Day Adventist can utilize this area for a church site. He
said that this will enable the petitioner to do public im-
provements contained in the original planned development.
He said that they are aware of the drainage conditions in
regards to the Dane property . He said that they have done
preliminary studies and feel that the 16 foot drainage
easement as proposed will meet those conditions and if a
larger easement is needed it can be arranged. He said that
they feel the church use is less drainage intense and a
better proposal than earlier one. He said that the staff
report states that the church will double the intensity on
the tract, fin said that the church would have significant-
ly less traffic than a residential or commercial use. He
said that they feel this use basically assures public im-
provements, helps church relocate and helps owner get on
with her plans.
Ana Rocco Pena, owner of property stated that one person
should be responsible for the drainage improvements to as-
sure that it will be constructed from the north to the
south, She said that the Seventh Day Adventist Church
needs to relocate because at their present location they
are surrounded by commercial. She said that this is a
benefit in all matters.
IN FAVOR: Bill Waist, Treasurer of Texas Conference of
:5-eventhi Day Adventist, stated that they are the land hold-
ing corporation for the church, He said that they purchase
and hold property for a local congregation. He said that
it is necessary for the church to relocate because of sur-
rounding development. fie said that it is historic that
they improve the general locality and that it will be true
in this case. He said that they are very happy to cooper-
ate with the city and that this proposal will enhance the
north side of Denton along with the retirement center and
the YMCA.
OPPOSED: None present.
Ron Arrington, 620 Northridge, asked if proposal is
approved will future land uses have to be approved,
Mr. Claiborne said yes because it is a planned devel-
opment district.
A concerned citizen asked about the building material.
Mr. Waist said that it would be brick veneer.
Eileen Lockhart, Northridge stated that there is already
an overconcent ration of retirement homes and churches in
this area.
Mr, Claiborne asked Mr. Dane if the drainage is satisfac-
tory. Mr. Dane stated that he wanted it in writing so
that It will be binding.
Ms. Lockhart stated that the lots that face Windsor are
higher and so the property behind gets most of the drain-
age. Mr. Clark stated that David Leingeber owns the lots
i
P 3 Z Minutes
April 13, 1996
Page 7
• that are behind the property. He said that if the origi-
nal guidelines such as the rear entry garages were followed
they could cargyy the dralna/0 to the low points. He said
that Mr. Leingeber has fought with the city over access and
has placed himself in a leggal dispute with the residents of
this area. He said that tRa people concerned with the
drainage need to request legal assistance to deal with his.
He said that these issues are not a public facility issue,
Mr. Pearson asked if the Lots were platted originally with
an alley in the back. Mr. Clark said yes and that negotia-
tions were made in that he also got driveways cn Windsor.
Mr. Pearson asked if there is anything that the city can
do. Mr. Clark stated that it is a civil matter between
Mr. Leingeber and the property owners. He said that the
drainage problem can be solved regardless of the alley.
Mr. Arrington stated that his main concern is drainage.
Mr. Clark etated the Mr. Leingeber's property was original-
I lplatted with a private access easement, not a dedicated
11 y,
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that several requests
avebeen ■~a on this property such as suit;,-family, two-
family, single family, townhomes and all were denied by
the City Council. She said that considerable opposition
from the Northridge community appeared to be a factor in
the Council's decisions. She said in may of 1985, the
city Council approved a request for a change from agricul-
tural to planned development that permitted 31 single fami-
ly detached lots (SF-7) and a three story, 38,000 square
foot retirement/recovery center. She said that this prop-
erty is located in a low intensity area. She said if the
amendment is approved, twenty-two of the thirty-one lots
would be eliminated and replaced by a S.8 acre church site.
She said a comparison of traffic generation figures reveals
that single family detached land use generates 47 trips per
day per gross acre, while a church land use generates d5
trips per day per gross acre. She said while approval of
the amendment would not violate the intensity standard, it
would almost double the intensity for this tract, In addi-
tion to intensity, neighborhood Input is the crucial issue
in this request. She said chat the neighbors have asked
how many times are they going to have to defend against
zoning that it perceived as a potential detriment. Another
area of concern is the improvement of piney Road guaranteed
by the original planned development. She said if the
church does not wish to install the required off-site im-
provements, it is staff's opinion that the developer should
petition to dissolve the planned development and allow the
zoning to revert to an agricultural classification which
would permit the development of a church. She said that
staff recommends denial of Z-1798 but if the Planning and
Zoning Commission is inclined to approve this re uest,
staff recommends that the original ordinance conditions be
incorporated in the amended planned development,
Mr. Pearson asked for types of insttrutional uses.
Ms. Spivey said retirement centers, sthools, day care
centers and universities.
Ms. Brock asked about the over concentration of institu-
tional uses in this area. Ms. Spivey said that it is a
concern of the staff,
Ms. Cole asked if they would have to come back to the Com-
mission to operate a day care center. Ms. ';piney said yes.
i
P 6 Z Minutes
April 13~ 1986
Page 6
REBUTTAL; Mr. Edwards stated that they meet the Develop-
sent Guide requirements and do not violate the intensity
standard. He said that he feels a church use will not in-
crease traffic intensity. He said that they feel a church
is a good neighbor to A residential area. He said that a
church can locate anywhere.
Mr. Pearson asked about the statement of a church can lo-
cate anywhere in the City of Denton with no restrictions.
Mr. Edwards said that A church could locate in an Agri-
cultural or single family zoning district as long as it
meets building codes and standards.
Mr. Pearson stated that within a planned development, they
need site plan approval.
Mr. Edwards stated that It is not because a church is not
acceptable but that it did not conform to the site plan.
Mr. Morris stated that this is a planned development dis-
trict and the Commission can approve or disapprove the
land use or any land use.
Mr. Pearson asked if the church organization is willing to
put in the streets. Mr. Edwards stated that the church is
purchasing the property and the petitioner will finance Im-
provements with funds made from the sale.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
• UHCISION; Mr. Escue stated the proposed amendment is
acceptable and Mr. Juren agreed.
Mr. Bscue moved to recommend approval of Z-1798 subject to
the original planned development conditions as outlined in
r-:d:nance #85.165. Seconded by Mr. Juren and motion car-
ried '4.2).- Ms. Cole and Ms. Brock voted no.
E. Z-1806. Petition of the City of Denton requesting a change
in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the
single family (SF-7) classification. 'fhe tract is o2.474
acres located at the southwest corner of Hickory Creek Road
and FM 2181 (Teasley Lane). 'fhe property is shown in the
Venter Survey, Abstract 1315. If the zoning change is ap-
proved, the property may be utilized for any land usa per-
witted La the single family (SP-7) classification by the
City of Denton Zoning ordinance.
Six notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet;
one reply form was received in favor, no reply forms were
received in opposition.
Mr. Pearson asked if the city was initiating the request.
Ms, Pujauski said yes. Mr. Pearson asked if the cityy owned
the land. Ms. Fujauskl said no, Mr. Nearson asked if the
property owners were in agreement. Ms. Fujauski said that
they were In question in regards to the request.
Mr. Pearson asked if this was a new practice for the City
of Denton. Mr. 8ilison stated that it is not illegal. He
said that it would eliminate future uncertainty in regards
to areas that have been annexed around this property. He
said that it is a right of a city and in fact the city will
be doing some more in the future. He said that the city
needs to impose permanent zoning. He said that the proper-
ty owners may come back at any time and rezone. He said
that a preliminary plat for SF-1 has been approved.
1139E
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDED SIZE PLAN FOR THE PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORrINANCE NO. 85-165 AS SAID
SITE PLAN APPLIES TO 14.0$7 ACRES nF LAND LOCATED ALONG THE EAST
SIDE OF RINEY ROAD, ADJACENT TO AND SOUTH OF U. b. HIGHWAY 77, AS
IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO PROVIDE FOR A CHURCH
SITE ON S.8 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN 'HE DISTRICTi PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF =1000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS;
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 85-16S, approved August 20, 1985, providing
for the establishment of a planned development district for 14.0S7
acres of land, being more particularly described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is amended
by adopting a revised site plan therefor, attached hereto as
Exhibit 8 and Incorporated herein by reference, so that the deve-
lopment and use of the property shall be subject to the revised
site plan.
SECTION 11.
That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance
No. 8S-16S, showing the amendment herein made.
SECTION III.
Any person who shalt violate a provision of this ordinance,
or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements
thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000,00). Each such person shall be deemed
guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion
thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed,
or continued. and upon conviction of any such violations such
person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION IV.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of tho date of
Its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986.
RAT STEPHENS9 MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHAALOTTE ALrEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,'TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY uF DENTON, TEXAS
By t
Na,.e rm vvw
Q
031111IT A
All that certain tract or portal of land situatej in the N,l1.
Meisenheimer Survey, Abatrect Number 810, Denton County, Texas, being
all of a certain tract described in a dead from C.C. Smith, at ux to
Horatio Pena, at at on the 12th day of October 1976, and recorded in
volume 808, page 920, Deed Records of Denton County, and being more
fully described as followat
Beginning at the northeast corner of said Pens tract at a steel pin at
a fence corner on the south boundary line of U.S. Highway 77;
Thence South along and near a fence on the most boundary line of said
Pena tract a distance of 804.81 fort to an iron pin at a fence corner
at the northeast corner of a tract described in a 4emd from Cleora
Parker to Melvin R. Dane on the 27th day of June 1964, and recorded in
Volume 511, page 596, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
Thence South 89 degrees 17 minutes 08 seconds west with the north
boundary line of said Dane tra : a distance of 1%.0 feet to an iron
pin at a fence corner at the northwest corner of amid Drat tract;
Thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 51 seconds East with the west
boundary line of said Dyne tract along and near a fence a distance of
299.12 feet to an Iron pin on the north boundary line of Old Sensor
Road;
Thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 38 seconds West a iistance of 43.36
feet to a found Iron pin on the southeast corner of the Pont tract as
described in a deed from A.R, Pena, Donald Bailey and wife, Silvia
Bailey to the City of Denton, Taxes and recorded In Volume 1179, page
64 on the 19th day of November 1982, Deed Records of Denton County.
Taxass
Thence North 00 degrees 04 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 97.54
found
in feet to
pin at th McEvint Jr,ataux torJ,A.oMillermanddrecorded
in Volume 921, page 4650 Deed Records of Denton County, Taxes;
Thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 44 seconds Nat with the north
boundary line of said Millar tract a distance of 109.96 feet to a
fence corner post at the southeast corner of a tract described in a
deed from Patrick E. Parker and recorded in Volume 667, page 592, Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas;
Thence North 00 dogmas 49 minutes 10 seconds Nest with a fence on the
east boundary line of :aid Parker tract a distance of 98.28 feet to a
fence corner post$
Thence South 88 degrees 53 minutes 29 seconds West with a fence on the
north boundary line of said Parker tract a distance of 139.20 feet to
an iron pin in the middle of R+.ney Road;
't'hence North 01 degrees 26 minutes 52 ssconda West with the middle of
Riney Road a distance of 659,95 feet to an iron pin at an angle point
in said road;
Thence North 27 degrees 17 minutes 51 seconds West with the middle of
Riney Rood a distance of 544,54 feet to an iron pin;
Thence North 48 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 24.73
feet to a found iron pin at the southwest corner of a tract described
in a deed from Robert J. Moon, at ux, to Charles Malvin Cunningham and
recorded in Volume 6320 page 2170 Deed Records of Denton County,
Texas;
Thence North 48 degrees 17 ml,nutes 30 seconds Zest with the southeast
boundary line of said Cunningham tract a distance of 174.94 fat to a
found iron pin at the southeast corner of said Cunningham tract on the
south right-of-way of U,S, Highvey 77;
Thence South 59 degrees 14 minutes 29 seconds East with the south
right-of-way of U.S, Highway 77 a distance of 231.23 fat to j found
iron pin=
Thence south 58 dqq:ems 50 minutes 46 seconds Zest with the south
boundary line of U.S. Highwy 77 r distance of 454,97 feat to the
Point of Beginning and containing is all 14.037 acres of land,
Z-1798
Wom aft~
e •r
1
r
wewr•s-/ # r
► ~ r
~a
1
i
I~Ile1r r~~~.~~y~•. ~
pw MAP a"
I h~r111'gj'^II177T1'IjK►
Kam
1 1 A,•` 1 Ii'p ►MCd flWt MOt/fKrtO
UT 1
~ M 1 1
60 A•Ma
b" LAW
I
LIM
1
Or•flt ~a ' ' / / / , ~ N
ua Mt. P""'► ~
URC O ' M Iwr.r. ■11
/ P.0
/ j I MOM71Mi11( M 1e1. M
tk/h N N► Ape
MY "W"Mmum ftom A.M
/ : my 1 awry a ►►Irrw, 71f1i
f I Illf(
I. i
I
/ l.~~1•r 11111
lop1 r
ANNA ►1MA •111•I• 60.0
1lallr w•`
4mlUmdUUU
L - - _ +It rry AMwr"Bom faii,
r • IIi paUq up
1
DATE: 06/03/86
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Q
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council U
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJ EC T: FINAL REPLAT OF BLOCKS 8 AND g, HILLSID'_ ADDITION; LOTS 1, 2, 70
AWL 8, BLOCK 4 OF THE G. M. GREENLEE ADDITION; AND ALL OF BLOCK 1
AND PART OF BLOCKS 2, 4, AND b OF THE HINSON AND WANDEN'S ADDITION
(CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S HOME ADDITION)
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE LONDONDERRY ADDITION, LOT 1, BLOCK i
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE WHITNEY PARK ADDITIOA
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE SOUTH DENTON INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION,
LOT 1, BLOCK I
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the above
referenced plats and replats.
SUMMARY:
The above plats and replats all conform to minimum requirements of
the City of Denton Regulations and Land Development Code,
BACKGROUND:
Tne Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its
meetings of May 27 and May 289 1986.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton and property owners.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined. i
Res a fu i subm ted:
Prepared by:
y arre
City Manager
a»` of t i n
Senior Planner
App ed
Director of Planning
and Development
0242e
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: June 3, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the Cumberland Presbyterian
Children's Home Addition, Lot It Block 1, being
a replat of Block 8 and 9 of the Hillside
Addition, Lots 1, 2, 7, and 81 Block 4 of the G.
M. Greenlee Addition and all of Block I and part
of Blocks 2, 4, and 5 of the Hinson and Vanden's
Addition.
SUMMARY: The purpose of the replat is to remove several
existing single family lot lines to establish
one 17.327 acre lot. The Cumberland
Presbyterian Children's Home is located on this
property. A specific use permit has been
approved for the Children's Home use. A request
has been made to amend the specific use permit
to allow development of a gymnasium that was not
shown on the original site plan.
All streets, utilities and other public
facilities are in place and adequate.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the replat.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Approval.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced replat
Dav d E list on
Senior Planner
1203]
olareArull
•
19 MII. M I'M ~~I,.M Y p ff a
M 1Mt ICY I'y i a 1.Iw .p/IR/ ■~r. wm IN MAW
~I No 0 .wMra twrl
OWNWHON to m"09
LL is ko 10 Q%= 0~
a=w"swlm" ma
no 1. r MA scowuwrp. At
I I - _ IfNdt~ Sti!- - _ -I I~~ ~a t1i11«~'~._
-
u.rlw..wa
j~
I LNI r~i.ewit1111 I w f f ~ r"0 ~.11w~i.r 1"~'r.w.1~..'v r.~wr
I •N.11.Ip. 11 r iv 111 w11 sm
' I 1 I 1 I I f I w~ rr~. jw ur i moor 10
r i,1
I I I I tlL 11..0w m I I
ew I r1 : rT1it N 1r r«~%. M. MI rM.t' i wi Y
I I I •e I or11MY. wre w. IIr w w.r~r w u. r allrpaw nawv
Imo.--~ r'c»../.,,'.,
SEA y. ! I t.. rw. «Il.ww «r.~r
I w. r,.. raw r /u r..sn1 ~«{rwrwl
6ro W1.IM4rti"Lt
r~1 1=0 ii wMLAIr' i11r.11'r 1.~
rr w1 Sam a..+ww
f r11...
.rrre+n r I,R
!y Pua+A~eu I lN,RVEr ~ I A-YOe AwM IMM k"4. v
*zoom m
fF' _ - w f M WM w Limit rMrrlM»I.Ar M..M f1
- ' r•• ~ ~ M.rw~1111M1 . I.r N i~1Y IIy M IIYIII
Krt S M ~wN.MYY.. IY~° a~w1 i a~rw r.t
+y I I ~ew w ri . ~ r"~'w'w31 rarer." ~ ww
M poem IN w
A.M.l. di aZ TONPItIN9 sLoweY A-040 w« Iraw.."~«w. r.
.I~.A.'i1r-t
1»R r t.M ..R/MI'1 pi i/.
.rte I I tM »I.1... WNW ON wra r wW r
"w1
w w 11
.r. w M NII m w
m
•I1M11M. IYll.r to
f . ~ii ri{R+ wIMIM pat.
I
=
y ~ f ~ ffe,l. Fan luorru:l ' I 1 .
VOW rn ~ i I' llrwcra calrviCA~..r..w...
I I
LJL.f
I.WI 1LL AOI aw tlrr I,t~ll/t
WOWS =W%=n~oWOM"*I=nrj~L&4
. MII
Q
s-
AC MAT
f7.lp AOKI IN rnt U11101LA1O m cuum't "m m mION
L Pueftm SS OV, Air A A,M.I. 1'aMKSSM lUIv A-UY La L a= !
CIwNu"m pN:lrYw" ammo, Wont. 2NC., pMlN IR1llatfx owfmTm
SS1l ! 1rIM RUl rM'N
100MTif W# P
~r fit/ C~ ,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
HACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: June 31 1986
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Londonderry Addition
SUMMARY: This is a 4.288 acre parcel located adjacent and
north of Londonderry Lane between Sam Sass and
Jason. The property is zoned light industrial
(LI) 4nd multi-family development is proposed.
The property was zoned light industrial (LI)
before the effective date of the ordinance that
changed the cumulative zoning structure.
Storm water runoff will be directed to
Londonderry Lane. Londonderry Lane is an
existing improved street. Service will be from
an existing 8" line along Londonderry and an 8"
ex~ension from the north and east. Water
service will be from an existing 6" liner an
internal loop system will be designed and two
(2) additional fire hydrants will be added to
the line.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Approval of the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
Davi Ellison
Senior Planner
1352s
,Ill 14 ,It M
no. 4 to IM lit M`-Hat NN If
44 ~1Sit.1A6144 114411"lik. 61"o, lot. all tot
=l~ltf^ttf•.
i CY`+t14 tot MI LlllrlI alitliitlf j
t 1f lql►OAt1/N!o t to a hill t{1/►6 #Iasi at 64 in IIIIfj t $$A r 114
MIINII►M NYIt't tt1900of 1µ1!90014N NL1045481118t111(114001 4.11411 3110 Af6oO to f."."t 00 It1$1iitool tool a Kl1<►t/111o tot
51114ml fool"/ M It tell, 11 11111:00111 Is t silo 111 s4tioll
HI1.1 f Iailt1 M also!. lot. Hi11111111NYol fib, Intl Ito.
1114 11900" M Hlll# to"Ill
101"1 /Nta 1 Msoaaf N 41NIIf W 11 Nt►N4 oft, s 41111001
H N4.►1 oil t1 M foal poll
• NOW { ■ afI•00 }rn 1,Y~ ,0019 4 1G 11NIi{It slNr'"1111l 1st b/411{11 646141st
`ll r , 4~f of, MM ,Y 1{1totl H to" 1400 ftl,
1001{1 !MIN to 000111 it 4110111 L1141 oft ?Bill fill 41111/ft
to 19900Y fill to to IHY PIN is lot off a 4~N1.►n YG9 4
s, fS4Sillliyfl111tIN of to ttNl1l lot MIIY 111of Itit1 ollA Mot 11
S11`f111'171 IlftNi"i a Ito* 1111,1111111! NNte{ Its of Waa 1
(KI stiff N NWt/ rf toll!!{ IN 1f 1110011 Ill} a orll Nfr
b
or 14.0 oIt r4 100 rn,r.tf.Htmut w to 11 u4 41164 44 if
m 1 H YYp.
a
}pN 100 e1/001 14b 14100 Nf of IH1{1 1UpyN IIN{{ Y1~►
7' 4r spy ' 141 '►iif 4giuN+fNts~144 qil lilll 4lil1I ii1i1111'i~ 1911tN~t
'~fy b 111 1 tub NIN oit N1 111119 rl t fl}iil roil rt wi1111igiii
VA, ad iltlth sit iiilmvs stilt MIIN,
l+.f ` a I~N 11~Ly
L WILL ( Alffl4af as plot
("allow it
1 vk .
111141 of, 141 osm"14"11,11,1 r00i14 II 111 Qt 11111M411
/"11111111i1N0 cN'IHItILMiYltt tliil/list 1{{1!fast, INC.
. r
l1 141 ( i 11110$11►/si111ii 100/11h Won11►I Mti,l lit
yy 11/64111 fYtorif 110110
11110 soots at pan 01 Wl to $41111 fall too or
a a W111aAMf ' i• t w ~I~rr a1a . L_
nosily i"m
"..saw n WtoffN41,f"1114"f
fMM'1MM OM • use to" Ri 1 NN INN 0(t 14 MN M1Ntltr
tteNt 11001111, of
44a M 1141 1, seat Wolff 0(91;11010 r 1
614(if a tlM" 1st ff9of of h 111!1011` test #It 00 H►N 41 111111 ifl
y I'M M IoM. too 14x1 IN $1100 110{ !MN n11114
Ol rillt1 YMgo rfHLSIo 1014!014100 10 II Ntt0011111 0114 114
flfL~ `alt ~ MNNI N IM l M M MNIOf,
NMI IwwINI N~ %"'~"j,~ Ipf?:'HNtT~,`T.t:t`/liT)
~nwgpo ON "book
" ••s 111 tYb 101 ►MIMM
' 11(llaplf t,~~OMI
Fox RAT
►l■ KAMM " & OAK PC AVOW
iaH 1d/4VN. M MY1Al/ 00"IL1MM lWF1dtM AMaa.1o10
l1Mp1 It~IMI,tOS1 !p
K"". -raft 9101 +W
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: June 31 1986
SUBJECT: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of the Whitney
Park Addition
SUMMARY: This is a 9,527 acre site zoned single family
(Sr-10). The site is located adjacent and south
of Longridge Drive approximately 700 feet east
of Teasley Lane.
Thirty (30) residential lots are proposed, An
adjoining tract between the proposed subdivision
and Tizasley Lane is owned by Denton Independent
School District and is the site of a future
school. Sidewalks are required along both sides
of all streets within one block of a school site,
A portion of this site is In the 100 year
floodplain and downstream culvert improvements
are required. Lynhurst Lane and Savannah Trail,
both residential streets, are proposed for
extension„ Lynhurst Lane will be cul-de-sated
at the property line where it abuts the school
district property.
Adequate watOr, sewer and other public
facilities are in place or available for
extension.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval
ATTA::HMENT: Reduced map
ewl
David Ellison
Senior Planner
1350s
bourNRloaE Ann,
VICINITY MAP
\
rkl .5 ts~°~, ~
+n 9 t4•-Ar• v - ^t _ ` J J '04'ii't. SCUTHh:W ADD.
- ' • C 440 ,'0?'t. I
F-
I
wvrt. 00 r
no .a Y ~ r
~ ~ ciso
s
IY s 1 IO ~
i PRELIMINARY PLAT
I a°i I~R~M WHITNEY PARK ADDITION
tt« 0ItOWNEI! 7[ASILY R0 ASbOC.
b.00444" 2 111 NTeN Tt. f6Z01
- - 4l.aY IN TN[ CITYA COUNTY Of DENTON
. I
-NO MAJOR PROPOSED CNAt/AE
s011V r IN TOWORAPNY ANTICIPAT O.
{11Orasv t•utu. I 4
I (eat t!t1Y4MT0a ~ ~ W
'a`im Mtr►• _ ( -AR[A.9M?ACREbS6 30 R[b. LOTS
-TNIS DEVELOPMENT AND AM04MY
y H, w 4r AWLA ZONED SP-10
I ` • b b 1 -~1L1 LOTS TO DE MA00 $Q F T, WSMUM
CAVIL 1.21.90
- TIMgERZJAKS 'ESTATES tcokW 2-AS
u.1.04{-*A *
BURKE ENGINEERING
BRIAN SURKE,PE.
1 CONULTM CIVIL EMSINEEI!
~ oatloN,tttAb anNebA.b1M
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACX-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: June 3, 1986
SUBJECT: Preliminary plat of the South Denton Industrial
Park Addition, Lot 1, Block :l
SUMMARY: The tract is 10.558 acres in size and is
located adjacent and west of U.S. Highway 377
(Fort Worth Drive) and adjacent and south of
the Texas 8 Pacific Railroad. The property is
zoned light industrial (LI) and warehouse
development is anticipated, A preliminary and
final plat was approved, but never filed, in
1985, The new plat shows a utility and access
easement that has been relocated.
Adequate water and sewer, street drainage,
electrical, gas and telephone facilities are
in place or planned.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the prelimnary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval of the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
David hillson
Senior Planner
1570a
E
1
• 1
I ,
~ I
T 0...tf....
otTILK, +IOT ro Rou.t
A. HICKMAN SURVEY A• 321
.y IRVINO VICIN PARTNERS ,
LjfMT IMONITRAL tort
+ /
f
I? Lo 64
f /Mi ~t qt iT
.IY' rfMOOMRO-+-~
a~ rt r « /
t r uONT INO NfM qtR~Lt~Tp 1w C. "LOT 1 ' - 5 C I lC1MT'bi Adt AMR.
_ 1MUrI w Warn u - ~ w P
e. a. a. 4 .R.a. eo. w vcY A 146
110 13
~ b
JAGOC • PU50C CO. /
UfMT mommAL Low , • L4CAT;ON MM
l0of' 11
MMS t IMO ?MM "M1 W hit atlttR
"to" waLn w "Om
A. Yym" wMm"d MMyM
PMMOnIR um TAC K*LOUr
LatAT1e60 WITWN TMR TIIACT.
L. f W 0"A OYTUM 1440AM 00111000
aaaM W CI mm",
NRIIWMAitY MM
SOUTH bE1J70N 111DUSTi1UL DARK ADDITION PMILOPLR
JACK M" CAW, Co.
LAIT I lLL" 1 "14 E. Ak KINNLY Oil
10.366 ACRCS yWTCMI, Tk, 7201
"lli, It d.RIC.CO.LLINVLYA•ft
CITY R COUNTY OF CLNlOIJ, Ttwm
0011111111
wRrRaItRN M WN
! r; IOIRM 1 momi. Mt LIAR
lay , as" I
moo I POOL
ACV, ICU "on
7- FIM~
June 39 1986 •r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT
Consider Final Payment to Jo Storer, Hobson Lane/US 377
Water Line Oversize Agreement in the Amount of $50,578.70
RECOMMENDATION
s
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of May 219
1986, recommended to the City Council approval of payment
of this amount to Jo Storer for final payment toward City's
participation on the subject oversize 16' water line.
SUMMARY
The developer has installed the line on Hobson Lane and the
City has accepted the line for operation/maintenance. This
request is for the approval of final payment.
BACKGROUND
The City Council had approved the oversize agreement Au ust
21, 1984. Subsequently, the bid opening for this protect
was also approved October 20 1985, in the amount of
$569241. However, the actual cost difference after
construction is only $S0,S78.700 and this request is for
the payment of $50,578.70.
PROGRAMS, D1PARTMBNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Municipal Utilities, Purchasing Department,
Developer, contractor, citizens.
FISCAL IMPACT
Previously City Council Approved City
Participation Amt per Bid Opening $56,241.00
ACTUAL: City participation Amt. after
Construction (this request) $500578.70
Source of funds: Water bonds- 623-008-0461-9138
4316U:7
r
Prepared by: Respectf Oly submitted:
45~;~e4'41 41-'
16y a jrr e ~itj% Ain er c,' ~
Srini Sundaramoorthy
Civil Bngineer
Appr ved by:
'E. Nelson
Director of Utilities'
Water/Wastewater Division
Attachment
bxhibit I - City Participation Cost Tabulation
II - Location map.
Ill - Minutes PUB of 5/21/86
43160:8
~9p• - - ~,1y/~' ~ •9~ •`~•.Ar - r Iva
' r I 1 a parr a . r A ~ ^ 1 i'► .
roe -L.20% lo
1 ''"rte' ~1'' ' ~r~
~.1• I Y i• YT ^.•r.r arrr•rara••M•1+ i
NCO
' } r I ~.r.rara*1 1'•ill' 1 ; ♦ r w s
• ' r 'r rmrr
r~op
ti •S . . ' ••r 4 y\ y
• 7 r
r ;
m
, 1114
00*0660.6
I ~ ~ S ~ r :i.
,q 4 ~ Za
*4400 00
~v
441
\
elk Ji
fir
7r
}
BID 0 9510 ROBSON LANE/US 377 16" WATERLINE
OVERSIZE COST DIFFERENCE
Description Qty Unit Price Extended Total
Difference (City's share)
16" Vs 10" D1 waterline 315q LF. $ 9.30 $ 290378.70
16" Vs 10" Class 50 535 LF. 11.00 51885.00
16" Vs 10" Gate Valve 5 Ea. 2,000.00 100000.00
16" Ve 10" 45' Bend 1 Ea. 350.00 350.00
16" Vs 10" 22Y Bend 2 Ea. 380.00 760.00
16" Vs 10" 114' Bend 1 Ea. 380.00 380.00
30" Vs 16" Casins 80 LF. 40.00 3,200.00
16" Vs 10" Plus 1 Ea. 250.00 250.00
16"x12" Tee Va 10"x10"
Tee W/10"x 12" increaser 1 Ea. 345.00 345.00
City's Share $500578.70
Quantities as verified by City Inspector and unit prices per Bid 09510.
hXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
May 21, 1986
CONSIDER FINAL PAYMENT TU JO STORER HUDSON LANE US 377
.
Ham explained that the utilities staff recommends approval
to the public Utilities Board of payment of this amount to
Jo Storer for final payment toward City's participation on
the subject oversize 16' water line.
According to Ham, the developer has installed the line on
Hobson Lane and the City has accepted the line for
operation/maintenance. This request is for the approval of
final payment.
The City Council had approved the oversize agreement August
21, 1984. Subsequently, the bid opening for this project
was also approved October 2, 1985, in the amount of
$560241. However, the actual cost difference after
construction is only $50,578.70, and this request is for
the payment of $50,578.70.
Previously City Council Approved City
Participation Amt per Bid Opening $56,241.00
ACTUAL: City participation Amt. after
Construction (this request) $50,578.70
Source of funds: Water bonds- 623-008-0461-9138
Boyd motion to recommend approval of the final payment to
Jo Storer. Thompson second. All ayes, one nay (Coomes).
Motion carried.
DATE: June 3, 1986
CITY COUNCIL RENT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FRO11: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9621 RENTAL OF SELF-LOADING SCRAPER
RECOOENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid
meeting specification of TKO Equipment in the amount
of $7,500.00 per month for a total of $22,900.00 1,icluding
pick up and delivery.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the three month rent of a 15 cubic yard
self loading scraper for use in the excavation activities
at the landfill. The bid offered by Ward Masengale II and
Plains Machinery are for 11 cubic yard machines. These units
are too small and are under powered for the particular use
intended.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PRO MS0 DEPARTIOTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Solid Waste Landfill Operations
FISCAL IMPACT: This rental will be funded from Landfill Development Bond
Funds Account No. 631-002-0803-8502.
Respectfully submitted:
9
Lloyd Y. arrell
City Manager
Prgpared by:
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
f
ZIA,
N ohn T Marshall, C.P.M.
on" AA~ft#
F,
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials equipment, supplies
or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals S' submitted therefor;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget
for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of
the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and
accepted herein; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$'.0,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
materials equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid
Proposals' attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved ae
being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BID ITEM
NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
9621 A~1 TKO Equipment 522.400,00
SECTION II.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bide, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
SECTION III.
That should the City and persons submitting approved and
accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his
designated representative is hereby authorised to execute the
written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
the written contract is in accordance with the terms,
conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified
sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents
herein approved and accepted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 3 day of June , 1986
RAYS PHENS
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CIT? SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM.
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
FAGZ TWO
I I i 1
11 ~tL ;}.It? AI f ':E:f-LLikililib Ngl'.EIlC<t'_t i'h3a~l1G3L~. kl]J1;'IE'IF 1 !11_liillEri cltulFNFlli ;
liiil
i.l,u'i11 I ~ I
Ilan iFlFilLill t`If'L[• ![Id;r(iG, C1;pL{. UtllblJl; 1'rhGLife
al UI CfapEr 1 i!~'r'.j r:Ll jii FIJI I Ili) i ~r!f119,7{1 r~'jryll~{Nr ;
I t I I
'r iI!E11'/B''I i i i ~'I11V1Ij I~1 ('n 11.E 1
I I i i I
!If 11 1 1 i rj?I, (I?r Fe:Jl Qtl Illd i
t 1 1
i r r ~ 1 1 I I
I I f I
1 I I 1 I I 1
;11v~el 1 NCO On [.at ~ [at iIDtpr natioil aI [at
11G-fiP ~lZP 1 815 ~1.P ~ G!5 1
I 1 I
I I ~ I i 1
1Gu8ii iard [goad tv ~i II 15 11 ! 13
1 I 1 1 I
1 1 ~ I I
I 1 1 I 1 r
I 1 1 I 1
I { I 1 1 1 1 I
DATE: June 3, 1986
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9607 STATE SCHOOL WATERLINE
REIC MENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to low bidder of the
four bidders meeting the specifications, bid requirements,
and proposals, Dickerson Con:,truction Co. of Celina for
the amount of $15,294.25.
SUWARY: This bid was sent to and picked up by several of our vendors.
We received response from then of these vendors. However,
only four of these proposals met our bid requirements. We
used these four to evaluate our low bid. The non qualifying
bidders included in their bid an estimated amount for
cast iron fittings which were not supposed to be included
thereby rendering their bids unacceptable, (See Tabulation
Sheet Item 1).
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
Utility Board Minutes
Utility Recommendations and Project Location
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Utility C.I.P. Projects
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund.
Resp~Ctf lly submitted:
Lloyd V. H r 11
City Manager
Prepared by:
Yme: John J. Marshall, C.P.M.
tie: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
me: ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M.
ftle: Purchasing Agent
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited received and tabulated
competitive bids for the construct on of public works or
improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and
City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, trA City Manager or a designated employee has
received and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or Improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals
and plans and specifications therefore; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$10,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS.
SECTION I.
That the following competitive bids for the construction of
public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita-
tionv", "Did Proposals" or plans and specifications attached
hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest
responsible bids:
BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
9607 Dickerson CoayAruction75 94 ZS
SECTION II.
That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive
bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the
person submitting the bid for construction of such public works
or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person
shall comply with all requirements speaillAd in the Notice to
Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and
furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification
of the award of the bid.
SECTION III.
That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all
neceosary written contracts for the performance of the
construction of the public works or improvements in accordance
with the bids accepted and approved !a rein, provided that such
contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and
Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the
terms conditions, plans and specifications, standards,
quantities and specified suss contained therein.
PACE ONE
ti MION IV.
Th4t upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive
bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and
improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized
contracts executed pursuant thereto.
SECTI0N V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 3 day of June 1986
RAY STE HENS
CITY OF DENTGN, TEXAS
A'T'TEST
CM=TTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMo
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITQ13 CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PACE TWO
6111 h y~di i UENESIUS CAi.','Enl 1 w„'r1,1N dJE I Dir c i+Ul'r I kILHIIA i°,F liI r r;:uu Iit Iho
bib TIII E 1466 c 1 f. U11cITIES i CONIRAGTIN6 iAVINb I Ulbl. to, 1 BENSON i UIILi1I LUIfSI. Uii. CUNIR, L{+;iSi, iiDII ,Ntill!IU
NNG ,
,TAIi ~LHbOI who-LIHE l Cb115:, GU C.U.
I i i LMl~fi Ilt~il i
I.-ENEII AYti it IJ. IYnS rl M.
1 I ' 1 i
I I I I ~ I i
iiL JI1N1~ ~ i
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
V~IIJUt'+ 11, Iilli I)L~lF,illliild i VENDOR i 4tN6DA
I ~Li~uiih ~ IlclrllUN i ;rEIIUUk ~ ~,'ci-hC~.i ~ nctdlillb I It{Iluilff ,
~ ~ I I 1 I i j I i i
I ;yi elp S( !4 f ofl h4l Pl line i /1f4,'ly i IIV )G, 19, 50'tll) ;`,!SN.i,J :IY,'C4J i
vl ernsle 19,33G.40 ! '7 .465.0) D 16,:0.4.54 I 1B,ilii,GU i [1, 6: S,uii I :5154 .V!f i 610.GU
lctal of the TI+D 97,i131.bO ! I~a,idk+.)R i 9b,i08.46 1 96,56,i+il l 110,50.60 1 I 85v.S0 ? 13'19Ji.5i.1 1 1441'66.11U i3.`i"r,JilIG.2~9,Gil
i
!Bid 6Gnd i yef i 4tl5 i 4P? i YPS i cnwer5 CI: i Ye5 Yea ND bor'd i yes 4P: i
I I I I I , ,
I ~ 1 1 ~ I I I ,
I I , I 1 I , , it These didaers did rn0t bid as soecilieu,
I 1liereforP, llle aidE riere nal Mtbloered in the e,ralualion.
I
i ;
i
I
June 3, 1986
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT
Consider Bic Opening, Bid 096070 State School Water Line.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of May 21,
1986, recommended to the City Council approval of the
lowest bid of Dickerson Construction in the amount of
$75,294.25,
SUMMARY
The bids were opened Aprii 15, 1986, and the results are as
follows:
Dickerson Const, Celina, Tx 759294.2E
Watkins Const. Corsicana, Tx 1780439.09
AI'benesius Contracting $78,588.00
Atkins Bros, Grand Prairie, Tx $890967,4:;
BACKGROUND
This is an approved CIP project to remove the existing 8"
bottleneck along I-3S at State School Road and install a
new 14" water line. This will provide adequate flow to
meet existing and anticipated growth in Corinth and Lake
Cities, Dallas.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Municipal Utilities, Purchasing Department,
Developer, contractor, citizens.
4316U:1
FISCAL IMPACT
FY 86 CIk Budget Estimate $48,QOOR
Recommended Award to
Dickerson Construction Co. $7S,294.25
Source of funds: Water bonds- 623-008-0461-9138
"It may be noted that the budget estimate was based on
existing drawing that showed only about 1800 LF of 8"
bottleneck. However, during excavation for design
purposes, it was actually found to be 2705 LF. Hence, Che
bid price is because of this expanded scope of work.
Prepared by: Respectfully submitted:
S.ini Sundaramoorthy oY e
Civil Engineer City Mannagager
Appr~"e by-
K. e son
Director of Utilities
Exhibit I - Bid Tabulation
II - Location map.
III - Minutes PUB Meeting of 5/21/86
4316U:2
~r
~ 1. ~ •
ff !
11 r •
I
~ awl I
lit
ova Im
'
PROJECT LOCATIONAIIIIIII
j r ~,1 :a;.•. r
3
-a+ l
D
T
CITY 00 UNTON, TtXA1 •
PUB MINUTES 5/21/86
4. RECEIVE UTILITY DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN.
Chairman Laney recommended that the Board review this
document and bring any questions or concerns they had to
Nelson's attention.
S. C
WATER LINE OVERSILhU AURM-MbST IN THE ANUUNT OF ONSIDER FINAL P YMENT TO JO STORER HOBSON LANE/US J77
.150,575.707
Ham explained that the utilities staff recommends approval
to the Public Utilities Board of payment of this amount to
Jo Storer for final payment toward City's participation on
the subject oversize 16' rater line.
According to Ham, the developer has installed the line on
Hobson Lane and the City has accepted the line for
operation/maintenance. This request is for the approval of
final payment.
The City Council had approved the oversize agreement August
210 1984. Subsequently, the bid opening for this prof
was also approved October 20 19850 in the amount
$56,241. However, the actual cost difference after
construction is only $50,S78.70, and this request is for
the payment of $50,578.70.
Previously City Council Approved City
Participation Amt per Bid Opening $560241.00
ACTUALt City participation Amt, after
Construction (this request) $SO9S78.70
Source of funds: Water bonds- 623-008-0461-9138
Boyd motion to recommend approval of the final payment to
Jo Storer. Thompson second. All ayes, one nay (Coomes).
_ Motion carried.
✓6. CONSIDER BID OPENING. BID #9607, STATE SCHOOL WATER LINE* y
Has explained that the utilities staff recommends approval
to the Public Utilities Board of the lowest bid of
Dickerson Construction in the amount of $75,294.25.
Has explained the bids were opened April 15, 19869 and the
results are as follows:
Dickerson Const. Celina, Tx 750294.25
Watkins Const. Corsicana, Tx 780439.09
Albenesius Contracting 780588600
Atkins Bros, Grand "Prairie, Tx 1890967,45
According to Ham, this is an approved CIP project to remove
the existing 8" bottleneck along I-3S at State School Road
and install a new 14" water line. This will provide
adequate flow to meet existing and anticipated growth in
Corinth and Lake Cities, Dallas.
FY 86 CIP Budget Estimate $48,0000
Recommended Award to
Dickerson Construction Co. $750294.2S
Source of funds: Water bonds- 623-008-0461-9138
*It may be noted that the budget estimate was based on
existing drawing that showed only about 1800 LF of 8"
bottleneck. However, during excavation for dosign
purposes, it was actually found to be 270S LF. Hence, the
bid price is because of this expanded scope of work.
Thompson motion to approve the low bid of Dickerson
Construction. Frady second. All ayes, no nays. Motion
carried unanimously.
7. UTILITY DIRECTOR'; UPDATE.
Nelson reviewed for the Board the details of a recent
lawsuit filed by the Sportsmans Club, the Sierra Club, and
the Environmental Defense Fund against EPA. EPA is accused
of failure to uphold the Water Quality Act (PL 92.500) in
the regulation of phosphorus and other toxics in waste
water, and in the regulation of storm sewer water quality.
Implications for the City of Denton, according to Nelson,
are additional facilities and higher sewer charges.
Nelson explained that bids for hydroelectric machinery for
Lewisville have started to come in and are currently under
review.
Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Next meeting scheduled for June 11, or 2S, 1986.
-3-
0173
~..r ~ ...r, ~„~~a~4er~ `a`.. v{ ssre t+3:i~.~„ ~~.v .1 +Y~° _:*raw;. ~r i-'-3a~i-. 3.~[-r •t . =may:
VAM : 04/03!84
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT '
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE INSTITUTING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 66.42 ACRES SITUATED IN THE
MOREAU FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRArT 417, AND BEGINNING ADJACENT AND EAST
OF GEESLING ROAD, SOUTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380 EAST, AND WEST OF
TRINITY ROAD (A-36)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval at its
meeting of May 27, 1986.
SUMMARY:
Miller of Texas, Inc., has requested annexation of approximately 60
acres and the balance of the proposal is being considered for
involuntary annexation by the City of Denton. The involuntary
portion of the request will fill in gaps between Miller of Texas
property and an existing annexation strip along Highway 380E. The
purpose of the Miller of Texas request is to seek zoning in
conjunction with the Lakeview development plan.
BACKGROUNDt
The City Council instructed staff to begin the annexation process
for the Miller of Texas property and the involuntary portion at its
meeting of February 18, 1986.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Several mobile home units in the Capricorr: Mobile Home Park are
included in the involuntary portion of the proposed annexation.
Approximately 5-8 residences and 10 total structures are located
within the proposed annexationf these structures are clustered
around the intersection of Trinity Road and Highway 380 east.
There are no businesses or dwellings on Miller of Texas property.
Approximately 1,146.75 feet of the west side of Trinity Road and
approximately 300 feet of the east side of Geesling Road is included
to the area of proposed annexation.
S t2 -p_
(A-36)
June 3, 1986
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACTS
Undetermined
eR u au tted: r
Pre Arad by* Lloyd Harrell
as City Manager
David Ellison
Senior Planner
Appro d:
Jeff Meye
Director of Planning
and Development
15516
'71-1 7-
NO.
• AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL
OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 3,10 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
"
eART SING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
COUNTY, F TEXAS; THE MCLASSIFYING THESSAMEYAS ABSTRACT AGRICULTURAL 'At'1~DISDENTON
TRICT
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, a request for annexation for the property described
in Exhibit "A", a copy of which is attached hereto and incor-
porated by reference herein, was introduced at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the
petition of Miller of Texas and the City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
.44
held for that purpose on the
day of M a ti , 1986 in
the Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; nd
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
held for that purpose on the ad tA day of 16 in
the council Chambers for all-interested person to state98their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the tract of land described in said Exhibit "A" be, ind
the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the propert!
situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate
part of the taxes levied by the City.
SECTION 11.
The property described in Exhibit "A" is hereby classified
as Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SEr,TION III,
Should any section or part of this ordinance be held uncon-
stitutional, illegal or Invalid, or the application thereof
A-36/MILLER OF TEXAS/PAGE ONE
ineffective or inapplicable as to any t, ritory, such unconsti.
tutionality, iileg0lity, invalidity or ineffectiveness of such
section or pert shall In no wise affect, impair or invalidate
the remaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such
remaining portion or portions, the same shall be and remain In
full force and effect; and should this ordinance for any reason
be ineffective as to any part of the area hereby annexed to the
City of Denton, such ineffectiveness o1 this ordinance as to any
such part or parts of any such area shall not affect the
effectiveness of this ordinance as to all of the remainder of
such area, and the City Council hereby declares it to be its
purpose to annex to the City of Denton every part of the area
described in said Exhibit "A" of this ordinance, regardless of
whether any other part of such described area is hereby
effectively annexed to the City. Provided, further, that if
there is included within the general description of territory
set out in Section I of this ordinance to be hereby annexed to
the City of Denton any lands or area which are presently part of
and included within the limits of the City of Denton, or which
are presently part of and Included within the limits of any
other City, Town or Village, or which are not within the City of
Denton's jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby excluded and
excepted from the territory to be hereby annexed as fully as if
such excluded and excepted area were expressly described herein.
SECTION IV.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the day of
1986.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1986.
MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CPARLoTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADA.MI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
A-36/MILLER OF TEXAS/PAGE TWO
~ x-.' -n .~q:+#-r~nr~.ts~+~--2"}.$~°¢'oT'p.~ • r_"$. ` y . -r wpx •e . -r- ,+pr:.,;
EXHIBIT "A"
TRACT A
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the Moreau Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, Denton
County, Texas being part of a tract conveyed by deed to Ralph
T. Bullard and recorded in Volume 1521, Page 948 of the Deed
Records, Denton County, Texas (being also girt of Lot 6 and Lot
7, Block A of the subdivision of said ',Inreau Forrest Survey
according to the plat recorded in Volume 50, Page 236, Deed
Records) and more fully described as follows;
BEGINNING for the Southeast corner of Tract A described herein
at a point in the present city limits as described in Ordinance
85-110 same being in the renter of a North - South public road
known as Trinity Road;
THENCE South 890 SS' 221' west along said present city limits a
distance of 1390.89 feet to a point for corner, said point being
the Southwest corner of said Lot 7 and the Southeast corner of
said Lot 6;
THENCE North along the present city limits .s established by
ordinance 84-98 same being the East boundary line of said Lot 6
and the West boundary line of said Lot 7, a distance of 886.18
feet to a point for corner said point lying, In the present city
limits as established by ordinance 69-40, said point also lying
350 feet South of and perpendicular to the center line of U.S.
380;
THENCE North 790 17' 1111 East along said present city limits,
350 feet South of and parallel to the center line of U.S. 380, a
distance of 1,411.63 feet tr. T point for corner in the center of
Trinity Road;
THENCE South 000 05' 36" East along the center line of said road
a distance of 1,146.73 feet to the place of beginning and
containing 32.39 arses of land.
TRACT B
All that tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the
Moreau Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, Denton County, Texas, being
part of a tract conveyed by deed to Ralph T. Bullard, recorded
in Volume 152!, Page 948 of tl.e Deed Records, Denton County,
Texas (being also part of Lot 61 Block A of the subdivision of
said Moreau Forrest Survey according to the plat recorded in
Volume 50, Page 236, Deed Records) and being more fully
described as follows:
COM1MEN"TNG at a point in the present city limits as established
by Ordinance 84-98 said point also being the Southeast corner of
said Lot 6;
THENCE North 890 52' 1111 West a distance of 500.0 feet to the
point of beginning, said point also lying in the present city
limits as established by Ordinance 84-98;
being present
establi hedhby90rdinance 8552101 a me the
the South city limits as
line of the above mentioned Lot 6, a distance of 889.2 feet to a
point for corner;
A-36/MILLER OF TEXAS/PAGE 1 of 3
. THENCE North 00• 071 49" East, a distance of 627.84 feet to a
point for corner, said point lying in the present city limits as
established by Ordinance 69-40, said point also lying 350 feet
South of and perpendicular to the center line of U.S. 380;
THENCE North 794 184 OS" East along said present city limits 3S0
feet South of and parallel to the center line of U.S. 380 a rne insthecpresent c~ ty limitso as established by Ordinance$4.98~ying
THENCE South along said present city limits a distance of 797.58
feet to the place of beginning and containing 14.54 acres of
land.
TRACT C
All that tract or parcel of land lyln and being situated in the
pMo
art reau Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, lenton County, Texas, belndQ
Moreau of Lot 5 and
Survey to cordingkto A of the the platsubdivision
recorded min Volume
S0, Page 2360 Deed Records, and more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING for the Southwest corner of Tract C described herein
at a point in the present city limits as established in
Ordinance 86.21, said point also being the Southwest corner of
said Lot S;
THENCE North 1' 40' East along said present city limits, same
being the West boundary line of said Lot S, a distance of 339.51
feet to a point for corner, said point lying in the present city
limits as established by Ordinance 69-40, said point also lying
3S0 feet South of and perpendicular to the center line of U.S.
380;
T'AENCE North 7S° 44' $4" East (by Ordinance, North 790 18' 18"
last) along the present city limits 3SO feet South and parallel
;o the center line of U.S. 380, passing at 1,413.71 feet the
east boundary line of Lot 5, same being the West boundary line
of said Lot 6 and continuing for a total distance of 1,469.75
feet to a point for corner;
THENCE South 004 07' 49" West, a distance of 627.84 feet to a
point for corner, said point lying in the present city limits as
established by Ordinance SS-210j same being the South boundary
line of said Lot 6;
THENCE North 890 52' 11" West along said present city limits, a
distance of SS feet, more or less, to a point for a corner, said
point being the Southwest corner of said Lot 6, same being the
Southeast corner of said Lot S;
THENCE South 86° 66' 59" West along the present city limits as
established by Ordinance 86.22 same being the South boundary
line of said Lot S, a distance of 1,319.92 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 15.79 acres of land.
TRACT D
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the Moreau Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, Denton
County, Texaa, being part of Lot 4, Block A of the subdivision
of said survey according to the plat recorded in Volume 50, Page
2360 Deed Records and more fully described as follows;
A-36/MILLER OF TEXAS/PAGE 2 of 3
i
,
• BEGINNING at a point In the present city limits as established
in Ordinance 86.22, said point also being the Southwest corner
• of said Lot 4, same being the Northwest corner of Lot 10;
THENCE South 20 4S' $1" East along the present city limits as
established by Ordinance 86-22, same being the West boundary
line of said Lot 10 and the East boundary line of a North -
South public road known as Geesling Road, a distance of 214.44
feet to a point for corner;
THENCE South 870 141 09" West to a point for corner, said point
lying in the center line of said road, said point also lying 660
feet South of and perpendicular to the center line of U.S. 380
and in the present city limits as established by Ordinance 65-43
1;
THENCE North 20 45' $1" West along the center line of Geesling
Road and said present city limits a distance of 313,0 feet to a
point for corner, said point lying in the present city limits as
established by Ordinance 69-40, said point also lying 350 feet
South of and perpendicular t0 the center line of U.S. 3801
THENCE North 790 18' 05" East along said city limits to a point,
said point lylna in the East boundary line of Gessline Road,
said point also lying in the West boundary line of said Lot 4;
THENCE North 790 IV OS" East along said present city limits 3SO
feet South of and parallel to the center line of U.S. 380 a
distance of 9SS.84 feet to a point for corner, said point lying
in the present city limits as established by Ordinance 86-22;
THENCE South 10 03' 4011 East along said present city limits a
ins the epres present cityfeet limitsaas point for established by corner, Ordinance t86lying
.22,
same being in the South boundary line of said Lot 4;
THENCE South 87' 04' 15" West along said lines a distance of
939.92 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3.70 acres
of land.
A-36/MILLER Of TEXAS/PAGE 3 of 3
i
°Kt a i _ r±.{ , s nx- e Y Y`i r+s*fi"'e ;T 4. R: a. v%- rl T' ,'a;^>.a . c
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
ue adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a soap of the'proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to,the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by thy, present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial anu industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Proper%ies in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F, Streets
(1) Emergegcy maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation, The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
sr
Service Plan
Annexed AreAd
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consi,=ts of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of rroblems compared to other areas, established
tecl-aical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics,
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
. , h pp
• ~ 1
w
✓ A ~ E
M fir. 1r w _
w '
V r
IL
Hartle•~ Field
)~Om- ~-.-s
• T = -
.r/ _
_ r r r ~r w..
I r ~ _ _
IL
mob
.mow
I *r .1P. tTR •
t ,
Lt . 340
dMM
C
2 8 8 / G"~.~
-VIA
r~r
1 r•r
r It„ F'4 .S 4 6 ' ! -
Cw r 0 t 1
14-36
11NN UT ION 6CRDU411
r/' April 70. 1.966 Submit City Council agenda item
✓Apcil'9. 1966 Submit agenda back-up
" April 1S. 1986 City Council sets date, time and place
!oc public heacinq
April 160 1986 Notice to Denton Recocd Chronicle
April 23, 1986 Publish notice and mailout
Apr11 28, 1986 Submit City Council agenda item
!/April 300 1,986 Submit agenda back-up
" May 6, 1966 City Council holds first public heacinq
at regular meeting
May 7. 1986 Notice to Denton Recocd Chronicle
L--.Mary 9. 1986 Publish notice and mailout
May 12, 1986 Submit City Council agenda
May X14, 1986 Submit agenda back-up
✓May 1986 Planninq & Zoning Commision makes
recommendation on pcoposed annexation
Of ✓ May 20, 1986 City Council holds second public
hearing at regular meeting
" May 26, 1986 Submit City Council agenda item
,._-May 28, 1986 Submit agenda back-up
June 3, 1986 City Council institutes annexation
proceedings at regular meeting
June S, 1986 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle
June 8. 1986 Publish ordinance
June 30, 14'6 Submit City Council agenda item
July 2. 1986 Submit City Council agenda back-up
" July 8. 1986 Final action by City Council at cequlac
meeting
" Denotes action by the City Council
09648
DATE: 06/03/86
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTi Z-1705
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council held a public hearing on January 15, 1985 and
recommended that an ordinance be written.
SUMMARY:
The proposal includes oluster, single family, commercial and
multi-family on approximately 78 acres located on I-35E southeast
of State School Road. The property is part of a 725 acre develop-
ment located on the southeastern edge of the City of Denton.
BACKGROUND:
This ordinance was submitted to the City Council on May 6, 1986 for
adoptions however, the petitioners requested that the ordinance bo
withdrawn from the agenda.
The petitioners disagree with the height limitation placed on the
commercial area of the planned development. The staff report in-
cluded specific standards and requirements for each section of the
planned development and that information was taken directly from
the petitioners' zoning submittal. The minutes of the City Council
meeting of January 15, 1985 indicate that the Council recommendation
was based on the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation, and
the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission of December 12,
1984 indicate that the Commission recommendation was based on the
staff recommendation and conditions. 's'he petitioners claim that
the commercial area requirements should be consistent with the
office area requirements because of a statement in their submittal
that the land uses are cumulative in this planned development.
However, no office area was recommended in the City )f Denton;
therefore, no standards other than those outlined in this ordinance
were considered by the Staff, the Commission or the Council.
The Legal Department has been informed about this situation and has
reviewed the recommendations and concluded that the height require-
ments and standards in the ordinance are the requirements considered
by the Council. According to the Legal Department, if an increase
in the height requirement or variance of other standards that in-
oreases the intensity of the commeroial area is requested, then the
item must be resubmitted for public notification and hearing before
the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
S
City Connell ltei ort Format
June 11, 1986
Page Two
PRWRAXSP DEPARTMBNTS OR MUDS ABFBCTBD:
No departments or programs are affected by the zoning at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact on the general fund.
Rea ctf yll witted
'~l loyd Barr 1
Prepared by: City Manager
C)0,b aii~
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Appro
Jeff Meyer
Director of Planning
ane Development
1714g
fI
3
II~I•i~ . :tY~ A F- nth C, 4 ~ a~ X1.9'3 r
t
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAMP WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF OHE CITY OF DEKTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE 69-1, AS,
AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 74.8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 35-E, APPROXIMATELY 2,500 FEET
SOUTH OF STATE SCHOOL ROAD, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREATION OF A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT FOR TNg LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN, SAID LAND BEING PART OF
THAT PLANNED 4'VELOPMENT DISTRICT CREATED BY ORDINANCE NO.
80.36; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIKUW AMOUNT OF $1000.00
FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted
the 11th day of. January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No.
6q-1, as amended, and as said map applies to the real property
described in gxhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, is hereby amended to provide for the creation of a
new planned development district for the land herein described,
said land previously being part of that planned development
district created by Ordinance No. 80.36, so that hereafter the
land described herein shall be governed and controlled by the
provisions of this ordinance; the provisions of Ordinance No.
80-36 as they apply to the lmnd herein described being expressly
repealed.
SECTION II.
That the site plan, attached hereto as Exhibit 8 and
Incorporated herein by reference, is approved ps a preliminary
site plan for the district. Any comprehensive Site plan
required to be submitted herein shall not be inconsistent with
the development concept site plan. Any amended concept plan
submitted for approval shall show and include the whole district.
SECTION 111.
That the district herein approved shall be subject to the
following conditions, restrictions, and limitations:
1. Prior to the beginning of any development or construction
within the district, or of any parcel of land or phase thereof,
or the issuance of any building permits therefore, a detailed
coarrehenslvc site plan for the parcel of land for which
development is proposed, whether one or more, shall be submitted
for approval In accordance with the provisions of Appendix
B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances and the requirements of this
ordinance. The comprehensive site plans required herein shall
be submitted in the manner and form acceptable to the Department
of Planning and Community Developa•nt and shall show or contain
irformati0n as to all proposed land uses, development standards
and regulations to be applicable therein, including, but not
limited to, the location of all buildings and structures,
streets, parking and loading areas, recreation, open spaces, and
¢qark areas, as or utilities and drainage facilities; the aaximp's
#I ht of ai~ buildings and structures; the dimensions of
building lots; the maximum lot coverages and building setbacks;
all buffering and screening cress and devices; the locstitn,
size, and types of detached signs mad the regulations to be
applied to all signs; and such other information is may be
required by the department.
2, Any comprehensive site plan required to be submitted
herein for approval for any parcel of land as shown on Exhibit b
s
total hall be in substantial compliance with the acreage densit and
definedn lndr uses dwellin
requirements shown
shown on Exhibits D-l an~ the
U-4, said Exhibits being attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference.
SECTION IV,
That the proposed land uses for the district as provided for
herein shall be considered perm.;ted uses, subject to approval
of the required comprehensive site plans showing the design,
location, and arrangement of the buildings, structures, lots,
streets, parking and loading areas, open or common spaces, set-
backs, buffering and screening devices, and all other
development features required to be contained therein, as
required by this ordinance.
SECTION V.
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the final comprehensive site plan hereafter
approved and made a part hereof for all purposes and the regula-
tions, conditions, and provisions herein containod,
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
14th day of January, 1964, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No.
69-1, as amended, is hereby amended to show such change in
District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions
and specifications.
SECTION VI,
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is In accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
other things for the character of the district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encovrging the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texts, and Its citizens.
SECTION VII,
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance,
or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements
thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding
One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), Each such person shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or
portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is
committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any 9yich
violations such person shall be punished within the limits above,
SECTION VSII,
That this ordinance shall beco►le effective fourteen (14)
days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary Is
Z-170S/PAGE 2
.
hereby directed to cause the cslticn of this ordinance to be
published twice in the Denton ecord•Chronicle, the official
• newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of
the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLER CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,*TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
{I
I
Z•170$/PAGE 3
ry
eK
•e .
rMIDIT "A"
• FIELD NOTES
YricFT
BEM a tract of land situated In the C, W. Walker Survey,
SO- 9501 CliylofODentonhe0enton.Count ,RTexas,Sandebeingsmoret
• particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the easterly line of Block 1 of
Wimbleton Village, plisse T, an Addition to the City of Denton,
Denton Count Texas said point being 77, bhe
northerly line of Winston Drive, measured Along otheeayterlyhline
of said Block 1, said point also being in the common city limits
line between the City of Denton and the City of Corinth, a point
for corner;
THENCE S2802a'E Ind ep9pinuin along the a sterly line of
Block 1 of $aidd Additon, 359 84 0 the beginning of a Curve to
the left having a radius of 895.0014 a central angle of 17 S6139"
and a chord bearing of S77136 ':0"E, a point for corner;
THENCE in a southeasterly direction and along said curve,
2E0130' to the end of said curve, said point being the beginning
of a second curve, said second curve being to the right having a
radius of :562.211' and a central angle of 2008'43", a point for
corner;
THENCE in an easterly direction and along said curve, 95.93'
to the end of *aid curve, a point for corner; the Left having a5radius of02672,21', a beginning of a ofu2a08'o Sthand
a chord bearing of NSS030123"W, a point for corner;
THENCE in a westerly direction and along said curve, 99,95'
to the and of said curve, said point being the beginning of a
Second curve, said second curve beinr, to the right having a radius.
of '85.00' and a central angle of 3I057,401,a point for corner;
THENCE in a westerly and northwesterly direction and along
said curve, 43',89' to the end of said curve a point for corner;
THEY-. N34037plop 302.90' to the beginning of a curve to the
left having a radius of 960.00' and a central angle of 1011'45",
a point for corner;
20, THENCE in a northwesterly direction and along said curve,
04 to the end of said curve, a point for corner;
THENCE N41021'E, 739,29' to a point for corner;
THENCE 1442051'E, 698.40' to a point In the southwesterly line
of lnterstale Highway 35E (a 300 R/i5'), a point for corner;
THENCE S47007'E with the southwesterly line of said Highway,
2178,42' to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius
of 5879,64' and a central angle of 3016', a point for corner;
THENCE In a southeasterly direction with the R/1S line of iaiJ
Highway 33E and along said curve, 335,'." to the end of said :urve,
a point for corner;
THENCE 5;0023'E and continuing along the southwesterly line
of Interstate Highway 3SE, $00.52' to a point for corner;
THENCE SSO033'E and continuing along the southwesterly line
of said Highway, 91,30' to a point In the common city limits line
between the Citv of Denton and the City of Corinth, same being in
the southerly line of the G. It', Walker Survey, Abstract No, 1330,
a point for corner;
4.1705
• h '
MISIT "A" (Continued)
• PfFl,n NOTF<
rra ontinued
THENCE ,V84000.W w'th the common city limits line between the
City of Denton and the City of Corinth, same being along the
southerly line of the G. W. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1
3an06d8..75' to the place of beginning and containing 70,:81 acres of
l
Tract 4
BEING a tract of Land situated in the 4,E.P A P,R.R. Co.
Survey, Abstract No, 9$0, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas,
and beingg more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING at a point in the northeasterly line of State
School Road (a 60' R/W) , said ppoint beinj In the southwesterly
line of Block 14 of Wimbleton Villa e, phase VI, an Addition to
the City of Denton, Denton County, exas said point also being
1.10.06' from the southwesterly line of Winston Drive, measured
along the R/W line of State School Road, a point for corner;
THENCE X480300E with the boundary line of said Wimbleton
Village, 1;6,90' to the beginning of a curve to the right having 11 a radius of 180,00' and a central angle of 65019Ill , a point for
corner;
THENCE in a northeasterly, easterly and southeasterly direction
with the boundary line of said Addition and along said curve,
20S•21' to the end of said curve, a point for corner;
THENCVEiSl6a600ge71PhasE
VI,tt99.91 to°Chetbeginningroflancurve
to the right having a radius of 180,00' and a central angle of
20°02'20", a point for corner;
THENCE in a southeasterly direction with the boundary line
of said Addition and along said curve, 62,95' to the end of said
curve, a point for corner;
THENCE, S4600SIE with the boundary line or said Wimbleton
Village, Phase VI, 217,00' to the beginning of a curve to the '.-rt
having a radius of 480.00' and a central anttle of a'
point for corner;
THENCE in a southeasterly direction with the boundary lint)
of said
curve, Addition
curve, .174.51 to the limits lineebetweenlld
the City of Denton and the City of Corinth, a point for corner;
THENCE SS007'W with the said common city limits line, :3,39'
to a point for corner;
THENCE S830121W with the common city limits line between the
City of Denton and the City of Corinth, same being aton. a northerly
line of the Levi Young Survey, Abstract No, I451, 61'.:3' to a
point in the northeasterly line of the aforementioned State School
Road, a point for corner;
THENCE NIS0321W with the R/W line of said State School Road,
124.82' to a ppoSnt for corner;
THEXCE N39 53'W with the northeaster) line of said State
School Road, 278,63' to the place of beginning and containing
1.351 acres of land.
S•1705
f
t
r.
Z-1705
i
Apartments
14.3 As. IM
r
LA Commercial shopping
`l 13.10 Ac.
CLUSTE 1
HOMES {1
19.50 Ac. ~e/
1.55 Ac. %
SINGLE
FAMILY
Cluster Hoa~ea
single Family "owes ow
•
~ r
rtmental
c
16.0 Ac
n.i
AJQA1~ R~wr114 Yww.w• • .y
EXHIBIT "C"
USE ACRES DEN. NsrTY TOTAL UNITS
Cluster 11,50 6 u/a 75
Single Family 4,55 4 u/a 18
Commercial 43,40 NA NA
Multi Family 14,30 24 u/a 343
Z-1705
LXKIBIT "1i-Z"
cLarrsu IIOM=s .
a=rzNZ:zar:
Single family detached units.
8=11=M=NTS i
height R,~uirem, *ntS% Two (2) stories in height.
Area tteauirements:
F ron_._,_ t_ Y_ - Minimum twenty-five (25) feet.
d Ya - Minimum five (3) feet. A side yard adjacent to a
street shall. :got be less than ten (10) feet.
ar Yard - Minimum ten (10) feet.
Lot Area four thousand five hundred (4,500) square feet.
Lot W_i_d, - Minimum fifty (50) feet.
Lost D,e~ath - Minimum ninety (90) foot.
Minimum Dwelling Sig* - The minimum floor area of any dwelling unit
shall be one thousand two hundred fifty (1,250) square feet.
Got Coverage - Maximum sixty (60) percent by buildings.
Parking ?tequiroments: Minimum two (2) spaces per unit.
Building Materials: All dwelling units shall be constructed of
masonry, stucco, or of a glass building material of the kind usually
used for outside wall construction, to the extent of at least
seventy-five (7S) percent of the area of the outside walls.
Res,, identia-mss.jjj;
Dl~nsi_ty - Maximum 6.0 dwelling units per acre.
Z-1705
EXHIBIT "D-2"
asMare t~tr~x„
ausNSTSa~:
Detached housing.
REQUIRINUTSs
Height Reetuirementsr Maximum two and one-half (2-1/2) stories in
height.
Area Require-Pontat
front y4rd - Minimu k twenty-five (25) feet.
d Yar - Minimum five (5) feet. A si4e yard adjacent to a
street all not be less than fifteen (15) feet.
Rrar_ Y,Lr4 - Minimum twenty (20) feet.
Lot Urea - Minimum seven thousand seven hundred (7,700) square feet. '
Lot Width - Minimum seventy (70) feet,
2!o DUth - Minimum one hundred ten (110) feet,
Minimum Dwa3lEna Qty. - The minimum floor area of any dwelling unit
shall be one thousand five hundred (10500) square feet.
Lot Coverage - Maximum forty-five (45) percent by buildings.
Pa rkinc ,I_ uirei m_sn+ = A minimum of two (2) off-sLreet parking spaces
shall be provided for each dwelling unit,
Building Materialsi All dwelling units shall be constructed of
masonry, stucco, or of a glass building material of the kited usually
used for outside wall construction, to the extent of at least
seventy-five (75) percent of the area of the outside walls.
Residential Dense ys
De,,-nsity - Maximum of 3.5 dwelling units per acre.
Z-1705
I
EXHIBIT "D-3"
COMMERCIAL SHOPPING
PERMITTED USES:
All uses as permitted in the commercial and office zoning
districts, except that the following uses shall not be permitted:
"Amusement, commercial (outdoor) drag strip or commercial
racing
'Asphalt or concrete batching plant (permanent)
'Brick kiln or tile plant
'Cemetery or mausoleum
'Dormitory, boarding or rooming house
'Dump or sanitary fill area
'Extraction and sale of Sand, caliche, stone, clay or gravel
'Fairgrounds or exhibit area
'Go-cart track
'Half-way house
'Hatchery (poultry)
'Hauling or storage company
'Heavy machinery sales and storage
'Home for taro of alcoholics, narcotic, or psychiatric
patients
'Livestock auction
'Livestock feeding plant, pens or yards
'Mining or storage of mining wastes
'open salvage yard for rags, machinery, etc.
'Petroleum collecting or storage yard
$Priv.ate utility shop or storage yard
'Rodeo grounds
'Sand, gravel or earth sales or storage
EXHIBIT "D-311 (Continued)
'Stables, .boarding
'Stables; commercial rental
°Stables, private club
*Storage and sales of furniture or appliances (outside of a
buildin3)
*Theater (drive-in)
*Tire retreading or recapping
*Tool or trailer rental
*Trailer camp or mobile home park
°Trailer rental or sales
*Used auto parts sales (inside of a building)
REQUIREMENTS:
tieightt _Requirements: Maximum of two and one-half (1-1/2)
stories,
Area keguireaents:
Front Yard - Minimum twenty-five (2S) feet
Side Yard - Minimum fifteen (1S) feet
Rear Yard - No rear yard is required
Landscaped O eon Space - Five (S;) percent of the total
of area s a e maintained as landscaped open space.
Lot Coverage,- Maximum fifty (SO%) percent by buildings.
Floor Area Ratio: Maximum 1:1
Building Materials: The main building exteriors shall bu
constructs o glass, stonm, brick, tiles, cement, concrete,
or similar materials, or any combination thereof.
ParkinjL_ Requirements: One (1) off-street parking space
snail be provide =r each two hundred (200) square feat of
floor space.
Z-170S
UIDIT "D-4"
►~~~rnico~co~Mrrso~s
csilNrTloNt
Multi-fi'mily. The struGtucos will range from two (2) units per building
to sixteen (16) units per building.
RsQOIReM6NTNt
me ht e u rune s: Two and one-half (2-1/2) stories in height.
Area Requirements:
front Yard - Minimum twenty (20) feet.
8 e YAW - Minimum ten (10) feet. A building separation of
fifteen (15) feet shall be obse reed between ettuctures. A side
yard adjacent to a street shall not be less than fifteen (15) East.
Rear Yard - Minimum twenty (20) feet.
Lot Area - Minimum sixteen thousand (16,000) square feet, ,
Lot width - Minimum ninety (90) feet.
Lot De.~nh - Minimum ninety (90) feet,
Minimum bwell n Size - The minimum floor area of any dwelling unit
shall be five hundred 1500) square feet for flats (single level
units) and seven hundred fifty (750) square feet for studios (two
level units).
Lot Coverage - Maximum fifty (50) percent by buildings and paving.
Parking ReguiraZents: A minimum two (2) parking spaces per dwelling
unit.
Building Materials: All dwelling units shall be constructed of
masonry, stucco, or of a glass building material of the kind usually
used for outside wall construction, to the ext@nL of at least
seventy-five (75) percent of the area of the r;utsidA walls.
Residential Density:
De sitY W Maximum 24.0 dwelling units per Acre.
Z-1705
1 ltee! v ~v r~ i r.♦ C E r.^, ry i t l E.
MMt o! Jas►uary 1S, 1l+3
Page Piro
3. P*iic Nea=ings
A, The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Myers Develo nt corporation reguestin on amendment of planned
development PD-123 on an approximately A acre tract located on the
west side of Interstate 35-8 approximately 2,3o0 feet south of State
School Road, The currently approved planned development perwits the
following uses: Motel and Restaurant Site, Office Sits, Rec7,06tion
Area, Cultural Center, The proposed amendment includes the
following land usest
Cluster Homes - approximately 00 units on 13.2 acres
with a density of 6 units per acre
Single Family - approximately 21 units on 5.2 acres
with a density of 4 units per acre
commercial Shopping - approximately 44.5 acres
Multi-Family approximately 360 units on 15 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
Z-1705
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Curtis Holly spoke in favor of the petition stating that the
development would be a joint venture. Mr. Myers of Myers
Development Corporation had developed several country clubs in
Texas. Mr. Holly then showed a slide presentation of various
country clubs and golf courses which Mr. Myers had constructed.
Mr. Craig Curry, with Nelson Corporation representing Mr. Myers,
spoke in favor stating that this petition was a proposal to amend
PD-12. The total project would cover 770 acres bordered by the
IH-35 and Shady Shores interchange, State School Road and would tie
into Robinson Road. Major points of access would be via the
proposed realignment of Post Oak Drive, Lee Drive which was an
existing road, the county road on the west and Lake Sharon Drivn.
Mr. Curry then presented a large msp of the proposed development and
pointed to the location of the proposed, golf course which ran
through the entire development. A large area to the north of the
development would be reserved for commercial shopping. Other land
uses would include condominiums and cluster hoEising, apartments and
5 acres of single family dwellings.
Council Member Stephens stated that the Council had received citizen
input regarding other developments on the need to keep as e;tny trees
as possible.
Mr. Curry responded that the center line of the property would be
cleared for the golf course and the developer's staff was hand
selecting trees which would be left in place.
Council Member Stephens asked if the developer could transplant
those trees which had to be moved.
Mr. Curry replied that discussion were being held on replanting of
the trees.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Harry Persaud, Development Review Planner, reported that 16 reply
forms had been mailed with 0 returned. Staff had looked at the
entire Oakmont development during their evaluation, The dual
jurisdiction between the citie3 of Denton and Corinth was a
problem, The Denton Development Guide called for moderate intensity
development along Loop 2981 however, high intensity uses were
already in place. Traffic would pose a problem due to the proximity
of the development to the Golden Triangle Mall, The traffic impact
would be addressed at the time of platting.
a
_ a e .I'..
city of Denton City council Minutes `
Meeting of January 150 loss
Page six
Denise spiVey, Development Review planner, reported that staff had
worked wit$ dyers Development Corporation, the City of Corinth and
City of Denton engineers for several months and felt that a Suitable
traffic plan had been attained,
Persaud further reported that me golf course would account for 20%
of the development and the Denton Development Guide did speak to the
need to preserve natural green belt areas. Oakmont would provide a
variety of housing types and the size of the development would allow
for coordination of one total project as opposed to smaller parcel
developments. Seventy three percent of the total project had
already been approved by the City of Corinth, Whether the petition
was approved or not by the Council, the development would have an
impact on Denton. The Planning and toning Commission had
recommended approval with 3 conditions,
Stephens motion, Chew second to approve with the conditions attached
by the Pia. Motion carried unanimously, .
4. Ordinances
A. The council considered adoption of an ordinance ,
accepting competitive bids and providing for tiie award of contracts
for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or servicest
providing for the expenditure of funds therefore► and providing for
an 'effective date.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-12
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE 8108 AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES
OR SSRVICESt PROVIDING FOR THE. EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. 0on roll call
vote, McAdams "aye,' Stephens 'aye," Alford "aye,' Riddlesperger
"aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
a. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials,
equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of
state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive
bidat and providing for an effective date,
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-13
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDINQ FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW
EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE
BIDS: AND PROVIDING FOR A3 EFFECTIVE DATE,
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance, On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger
"aye.' Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye., Motion carried
unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to
the commercial (C) district on two tracts totalingq 18,8 acres
located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 2500 feet south
of last McKinney Street (FM 426) x-160
~I
,
,t
U t
i
UTY COUNCIL RE0,091 FORMAT tday 27, 1986
TO; MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FRO!1; LLOYD V, HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT; Acceptance of Lar.:l for Park Purposes
BECOMENDATIOR:
Passage of ordinance to accept 16.0455 acres of land for the purpose of
a park.
Approximately 16 acres of land was donated by thc. Foxworth.
$ IMAL
Galbraith family to the Trust for Public Land for the eventual contribution
to the Citv of Denton as a park. This land has been held by the Land
Trust until the City secured a development grant from the State of '11axas
using the land value as an inkind match for the grant.
BACKGROUND: The nrojoct was started when the land was made available in
December, 1984. An application for developmental funds wc.s submitted on
Januarv 31, 101'15. A City Council resolution supporting authorizing
the City to seek funding for this part: was adopted on Feb,,-uary 5, 1905.
A resolution of support has also been adopted by the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board of t Ci v
PROGRQN~S, AE1 ARTt1E T 0 ..URDU S AFFECTED ;
The nark will be a neighborhood oriented park serving primatIly residences
within a half mile radius. Also, it is adjacent to Woodro- {iilson
Elementary School and will be available for their use.
FISCAL IMPACT: Qevelonment of the site will be undertaken by a $71,000
grant from the State as a match for the value of the land. Additional
State funds will be received by matching inkind labor and equipment use
values of City employees and City equipment during construction. Total
construction cost is estimated to be $160,000.
RESP FULLY SUB ITT
G/
LLOYD V. HAR ELL
CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY. 17
M Iabert K. Ticknea
TITLE Suoerintendent of Parks
APp D
AM
TITLE
1431E
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE CONVEYANCE BY DEED FROM THE TRUST
FOR PUBLIC LAND OF 14.0455 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE H.
CARTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 281, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON,
TEXAS{ AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the deed from The Trust for Public Land, a California
nonprofit corporation, a copy of which is attached hereto, be
accepted by the City of Denton, Texas, conveying the above-
mentioned property, legally described as set forth therein.
SECTION 11.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986,
R-
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
CHINOTTE ALLEN, MY SSCRITM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
BY. r
I~
r
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEEP
THE STATE OF TEXAS}
} KNON ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF DENTON )
That THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAA9, a California nonprofit corporation of the
Countyy of San Francisco and State of California, as a gift for no consideration,
has GRANTED AND CONVEYED, and by these presents does GRANT AND CONVEY unto the
CITY OF DENTON, an incorporated city, of the County of oENTON and State of
TEXAS, 811 of the following described real property in DENTON County, Texas,
to-witl
All that certain tract or parcel of lend situated in the II. Carter Survey,
Abstract 281, City and County of Denton, Texas, heing a part of a (called)
153.86 acre treat described in a deed from roxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co.
to Builder's Development Co. and recorded in Volume 503, Page 640, Deed
Records of Denton County, and beinq more fully described as followst
6EG2NN2NG at the Southeast corner of Lot It Block C of AOWdale Addition,
Saction One as shown by the plat recorded in Volume 30 Pege 26, plat 11e-
cords of Denton CountynTNEWS N. 25 54' t, with the Bast boundary 44no)
of Avondale Addition a distance of 785.44 foot to a steel pin at the
Northeast cognac of Lot Op Slock C1
THENCE A. 74 20, Z. with the South boundary line of Avondale Addition,
Section Threat a distance of 462.10 feet to a steel pint
THENCE 41 141 E, with the South boundary line of said Addition a
distance of 369.0 foot to a steel pint
THENCE with a curve to the right having a central angle of 53° 461, a
radius of 315.61 fast, a chord of N. 74° 07, E. 285,17 feet ante an
arc distance of 296.11 feet to a steel pin,
THENCE S. 79° 001 E. with the South boundary line of Section Three a
distance of 186.80 feet to a steel pin at the Northwest corner of
cot 240 61ogk D of Avondale Addition, Section Threat
THENCE 8, 2 481 10" W. with the Nest boundary line of Lot 24 n
distance of 204,22 feet to a steel pin on the South boundary line of
Devonshire Daives
TRO Cs N. 87 121 W. with the South boundary line of Devonshire Drive
a dlstaaoe of 21,97 feet to a steel pin atthe Northweet corner of
Lot lit elnk s of Avondale Addition,
TIIENC11 S. 1 561 20" S,with the west boundary line of tat 0 a distance
of 196.40 feet to a steel pin at the southwest corner of fat 17, on
the North boundary lima of Lot 2, aleck t, of wnr.t(nohom woods Additions
THENCE S. a7 471 W. with the North boundary line of Nottingham Woods
Addition a distance of 161.97 feet to a steel pint
THENCS S. 62 571 N. a distance of 421.12 feet to a steel pint
THENCE a. $60 001 W. a distance of 233,35 foot to a ottel pint
THENCE S. 50° 29' N. a distance of 249.09 feet to a steel pint
711ENCS a. S7° 53, N. a distance of 200.49 feet to a steel pint
TREKS S. 25° 161 N. a distance of 110.45 feet to a steal pin on the
North boundary line of Hanover Drivel
THENCE N. 62 271 38" l4, with the North boundary line of Hanover,
Drive a distance of 373.75 feet to the place of beginning and con-
taining in all 16.0459 acroe of land.
This conveyance is Subject to any and all restrictive covenants, reservations
and easements thereon of record In the office of the County Clerk of Penton
County, Texas,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the sold premises, together with all and singular the
rifts and privileges and appurtenances thereto in any manner belonging unto the
said grant", its succesisorso heirs and Ash s foreverl and It floes hereby hind
Its successors and assigns to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND all and singular the
said preteises unto the slid Pantee, its successors and assigns, against every
person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the saws or any part thereof.
Wells
EXECUTED this 4th day of April, A.D. 1966.
THE TRU
bill!" -
• •
• 8y e5ird•" f
Titles Assistant Secretary
State of California
County of San Franclscoiss.
On this 4th day of April, In the year 1986, before as Ellen P. Rosenbluth,
the undersigned Notary Public,
me lly appeared Nartin J. Rosen and Stephen
proved - to w personaor
E. Thompson, personally known to
(
saeistaetoay esrieace) to be the person(s) who executed the within Instrument
corporationtthand ereinsnamedtandcacknowledgedeto ltot hattthe half of the
corporation executed
it.
nor~r►oeuc.oxae,r,n
cm~ocowmau~~+a~sro
My comissioo expires January 6, 1990
000
oa'
hip"
r+wl t~,hry
4hrnf4lrON Alta
MWltlrf/J~i~/ ~,Ife Tail
IrY~"
~ CITY
or
SCMOO~`
• h,Hcr
1
R t S 0 L U T 1 0 N
A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF DENTON DESIGNATING
CERTAIN CITY OFFICIALS AS BEING RLSPONSIDLE FOR, ACTING FOR, AND
ON BEHALF Or THL CITY or DENTON LN DItALING WITH THE TEXAS PARRS
AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE
LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT Or L965; CERTIFYING THAT THE
CITY Or DENTON IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER SUCH
PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has passed the Land and
Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578), auchorit-
ing the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial assistance
to states, and political subdivisions thereof, for outdoor
recreation purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has adopted Article 6081r,
V.A.C.S., for the purpose of allowing the State of Texas, and its
political subdivisions, to participate in the federal program
established under said Public Law 88.578, or such other programs
as are hereinafter established by the Federal Government; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is fully eligible to receive
assistance under this Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton is desirous of
authorising its administrative staff to represent and act for the
city in dealing with Texas Parks and Wildlife Departsent concerning
this Program; NMI THEREFORE,
BE is RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I:
That the City Council of the City of Denton hereby certifies
that the City of Denton is eligible to receive assistance under
Public 88.578; as augmented by Article 6081r, V.A.C.S.
SECTION II:
That the City Council hereby authurLses and directs its City
Manager to represent and act for the City of Denton in dealing
with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for the purpose of
PAGE 1
this Program. The City Manager is hereby officially designated as
the City's representative in this regard,
SECTION III:
The City Council hereby designated its Director of finance as
the official authorised to serve se the City's fiscal officer to
receive Federal funds for purposes of this Program.
SECTION IVI
The City Council hereby specifically authorises the City
officials herein designated to make application to the Texas Parks
and Wildlife DepwAs nt concerning the tract of land known as
Northeast Park in the City of Denton,
INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED by the affirmative vote of the
City Council of the City of Denton, on this day of
1985,
Nja
1
CI OP D N, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHAKWTTL ALLEN CITY 5L
CITY OF DENTOW,~TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORN:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
BY: ►1Iw+
PACE 2
ci
r
Resolution of support
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING, THE PARTICIPATION Of THE DENTOW PARRS
AND RECREATION DEPAATMUM IN THE GRANT PROCEis roR rLgm
ASSOCIATED MIT" THE LAND AND MATER CONSERVATION rM AND LOCAL
PARK ruND As CONDUCTED lY THE STATE Of TEXM THROWN THE TEXAS
pAAKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTYSII'1',
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department to responsible
for the planning, organising, and operation of all
City recreation programs and the construction and
maintenance of all city owned open space, parks, and
cemeteriesr and
WHEREAS, we believe this grant application reflects sound
s and
the City of of Donthe tons and
Recreattionr Department on the part
WHEREAS, the land which will be secured will greatly impact
the area of Denton where it will be locatedt and
WHEREAS, we believe that funding this application would result
in increased outdoor recreation opportunities for the
citizens of Dentoni
St IT RESOLVED THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY DOW Or
THE CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS, states its enthusiastic support for
needed he Land Parks and and Recreation rConservattiion rFundsfor effort
Local tPark
and acquire belief
Funds for desSred development at a new northeast park siteb
s • amp • ,
a roan
VAc • a one, x e r Ronnie Robortep
QOOC G I i .
ark Of ti0 oard !wee •r ro n rave no',B'o-ard member
71 '7!777747~ _7 i
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE 8171 566.8200
CITY OF DENTON
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 1985
5:30 P.M. SENIOR CENTER
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Campbell, Chairman
Ronnie Roberts, Vice-Chairman
John Traveile
STAFF PRESENT: Steve Brinkman, Director, Parks and Recreation
Joy Hesch, Senior Secretary
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mike Campbell, Chairman.
II. APPROVAL OF MINU:'ES
On a motion of Ronnie Roberts, second of John Travelle, the
minutes of the meeting of December 12, 1984, were approved.
III. OLD BUSINESS
1. Discussion of Mandatory Land Dedication Ordinance:
Steve told the Board the proposed ordinance is still in
the city Attorney's office for approval. When that
approval is received, the ordinance will be taken before
the City Council at its workshop meeting. Prior to the
meeting with the City Council, the Board will have a
special meeting to review the ordinance.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
1. Discussion of Land Donation in Northeast Denton:
Steve announced the donation by Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber
Company of 16 acres in northeast Denton for a park site.
The appraised value of $245400 is being used to apply for
a grant from the State for development.
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT / 811.387.6146, 566.8270
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting
January 30, 1985
Page - 2
Steve presented two resolutions for consideration by the
Boards one for the City Council and one a resolution of
support by the Parks Boards supporting the participation
of the Department in the grant process for funds from the
State of Texas for development of the proposed park site.
Steve said the donation cannot be accepted until the
process has been completed through the State. John
Travelle moved and Ronnie Roberts seconded the motion to
support both resolutions. The motion was passed by a
unanimous vote.
V. OTHER BUSINESS
Steve reviewed the proposal for devel,o men*, , ns•
• dt;T~bol /park and
school/center sites. The Board agreed with the concept and
encouraged the Department to proceed with developing the
proposal through the necessary channels.
Steve said the Department had received an opportunity to
develop a lighted driving range at North Lakes Park with a
minimum investment. The first year should generate enough
revenue to pay for the development and in ensuing years should
provide a good source of revenue for the Department.
VI. ADJOURN
On a motion by Ronnie Roberts, second of John Travelle, the
meeting was adjourned.
MINU0013
s. 1444E
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR-ONE-MAY
TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TO NORTH ON THE BAST FRONTAGE ROAD OF INTER-
• ONE-WAY TRAFFIC M 3FROM NORTH TO SOUTH ON NB WEST HIGHWAY
FRONTAGE ROAD FOR OF
INTERSTATE
BETW::BN HIGHWAY 380 AND P.M. MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 00. 0 FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION I.
That he e intersection with Highwaye340atooitsnIntersectionhwith3Highwayl77
is hereby restricted to one-way traffic from south to north.
i
SECTION II.
That the west frontage road of Interstate Highway 3S from its
Farm-to-
Market 11173 Highway inter ne-iway with
north to south.
SECTION II1.
That when signs are in place giving notice thereof, any per-
son who shall violate the provisions of this ordinance shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two
Hundred Dollars ($200.00),
SECTION IV.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record -Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton. Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of
its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
RAT STEPRENSO MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST.,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVBC AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADANI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
81
. T I1 I1~M
MINUTES
April 7, 1986
PRESENT: Gilbert Berstein, Chairman - Doris Chipman, Gene
Gohike, Dan Martin, John Tompkins, Wayne Autrey,
Virginia Gallian, Bruce Chamberlain
ABSENT: Vivian'Edwards .
The meeting was called to order by Gilbert Berstein at St30
p,m,, on Monday April 7, 1986, Wage Autrey made a motion to
approve the minutes of March 3, 186 and Dan Martin seconded
the motion, Motion passed unanimously,
ITEM 02 CONSIDEK CKHATINNG O,NE-WAY SERVICE ROADS ON I-3S FROM
Joe Thompson, 'traffic Foreman, presented viewgraphs
showing the traffic flow, He reported in 1V83 there
was 41 accidents, 1984 - 34 accidents and since the
beginning of 1986,12 accidents.
Gilbert Berstein asked if anyone was present to speak
in favor or against the proposal.
Hunter Warrell, residing at 2115 Greenway Drive, came
forward to spook in opposition of the request. he
said it was .3 stiles to 380 from sits home if changed
it would be 1.8 miles longer, Mr. Warrell asked if a
curb cut could be made at orge of the south streets,
such as Greenway Drive, to get to 380, In that event
he would have no objection,
Pete Hale, owner of the Shell service station at Mesa
and 380 came forward to speak in opposition. He said
Mesa Drive was already overloaded, If the service
road were made one way, it would direct more traffic
up Mesa Drive. Eighteen wheelers often block Highway
38U and traffic flows up the service road,
Dave Bligh came forward to speak in opposition of the
request. He said if the lights were synchronixe4iit
would solve the problem, Presently, he was only 3
blocks from the hospital if changed he would be 2-3
miles from it,
Dan Martin asked how many residents lived in the
area, Mr. Bligh said 40-50 houses, some townhouses
plus a new development to the east,
pa=e 2 of 4 pares
Roy Metzler owner of Metzler's Grocery, at the
corner of ISS and 380 said it would cost a lot of
money to advertise a new route to the hospital.
Being next to the Shell Station, his customers have
to go out 30 feet to go up 3d0, If they hit a red
light, it would be a long wait, Gravel trucks and
eighteen wheelers, would cause a greater stack up,
Roy Metzler said McKinney had a similar situation at
380 and 7S. 'I'hey have double stop signs, Gilbert
Berstein said he believed those were one way service
roads which now are signalized.
John Miller, District Engineer, from Dallas District
McKinneywayin eraartmnt ction c was forar, similar He sa135/380
intersection, The frontage roads in McKinney were
two way for a long while. There was flashing lights
but the difference was you stopped at both
intersections. The distanco from the intersection in
McKinney was further than 135/380. McKinney finally
after a long period of time, decided to change the
frontage roads to one way. At that time, the state
started plans to signalize that intersection and a
diamond intersection further south of 75. The change
over caused no major problem. McKinney seemed to be
nappy with the signalization.
John Miller said the Highway Department wanted one
way frontage roads for many years and it has been a
policy of the district not to signalize a diamond
intersection on road access as long as there are two
way frontage roads going one direction out of the
intersection and one way frontage roads going another
direction which is the situation. He said, the
Highway Department had told the laity of Denton a
number of years ago as soon as that section of the
frontage road was one way they would initiate actions
to cause full signalization to go in at that
location, It was his understanding the frontage road
in that section would be going one way, The question
was when, The City Council already passad the
resolution stating the frontage road would change to
one way, The latest date would be when the bridge was
built over I3S in conjunction with the seconJ phase
of Loop 288 construction which is estimated to be
roughly 4 years off, That section of frontage road
would have to change to one way. The intent was to
try and change the frontage road before that time and
to get fully actuated signals. Mr. Miller said
inquiries had been received from the Governor's
office concerning the intersection. Citizens of
Denton had written the Governor's office in Austin
complaining and asking why there wasn't signals at
page 3 of 4 pages
the intersection. The Highway Department had to do a
history sumation on the intersection in response to
the Governor's request. That was what brought.it up
again about six months ago. It has been the Highway
Department's intent that one way frontage roads are
safer on any controlled access facility. Accident
soatiiniprove that. Mr. Miller said they would like
tLate plans for signalization at the
intersection as soon as possible but couldn't do so
until son& commitment from the City was made to
change the frontage road to one way.
Wayne Autrey asked if 135 was going to be widened and
was the overpass at 380 going to be widened. If so,
would that affect the signalization that was put in.
Mr. Miller said at the time signalization was put in,
they would look at future plans and try to put
signalization in that could be reajusted or they
would locate things so it wouldn't affect it later.
John Tompkins asked how far north the loop over I35
would be. Mr. Miller said the bridge would be closer
to 135 and 77 intersection.
Gilbert Berstein asked the staff how the accident
rate compared with other areas in the City. Joe
Thompson said it was in the medium range.
Dan Martin asked Mr. Miller why the State wouldn't go
ahead and signalize the intersecton. Mr. Miller said
the State wouldn't consider the additional money to
signalize the intersection with two way front age
roads knowing just a few years down the road it would
be going to one way frontage roads.
Mr. Miller said there was one other option, to ahead
and make both sides all way stop at both
intersections in an attempt to cut down accidents.
This would cause stack up and delay.
STAFF RECOMMENDED: Approval
COMMISSIONERS: Gone Golke made a motion to accept the City
Staff recommendation. Doris Chipman
seconded the motion. A roll call vote was
taken. Doris Chipman, yes - Gene Golke
yes - Wayne Autrey, yes • Virginia Gallian,
yes - Gilbert Berstein, yes - John
Tompkins, no - Dan Martin, no Bruce
Chamberlain, no. Motion passed to approve
the change to one way service road.
ITEM N3 CONCNSSI~DER
RRAAFFIC STUDY TO ELIMINATE MCXINNEY AT
TUC SIGN L
This item was postponed due to the traffic study not
coming in.
Cl'1'1~ of Dffn No TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 216 E. MoKINNEY ST, I DENTON, TEXAS 70201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 7, 1986
TO: Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission
!FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consider creating one-way service roads on 135 from
Highway 380 to Highway 77 business route
There has been a fairly high accident rate at Highway 380 at
135. The intersection is only partially controlled by flashing
yellow and red beacons. These function well when proper
degrees of courteous driving are used. During peak hours, the
traffic loa6s the intersection now handles is great enough that
stacking occurs. This reduces the drivers desire to act
courteously and accidents result,
Without the service roads being one way north of Highway 30.u,
the intersection can't r.e signalized. A traffic signal can
only handle one way tra.ff.~.c facing a signal beacon both legally
and in practice.
Other access now exists to the Greenway Club Estates area.
Payne Drive has now been linked to Thunderbird creating a route
to Highway 380 down Bonnie Brae. Those people nave adequate
access now both for fire safety and comfortable driving
distances without the two-way service roar'.
Persons on the west side of 13S have access from Mesa Drive to
all the side roads. Since Mesa has recently been resurfaced,
it is a good quality access.
In summary, to solve existing problems, (Highway 38U at 13S
Intersection) while also planning for the future (widening of
135 to 6 lanes from Hickory Creek to Highway 77 Business -
currently under study by District 18) the service roads should
be changed to one way travel. The staff definitely recommends
approval since the recent connection of Thunderbird to Westgate
eliminates the remaining access problems,
j ry 1 rk, P.E.
C ty E neer
00387E 817/6064200 D/fW METRO 430.2820
W!"1~ 0/ O~LNTON DtMTOM, TtXA~ Ttl01
Karah 18, 1986
Dear Property Owners/Business Owners/Residents:
R!: MAKING S[RVICR ROADS 0118-WAY 09 I-35 fROK HIGHWAY 380 TO HIGHWAY 77 BUSINKS9
The City of Denton is very Interested in making the service roads on I-35 work as
one-way access from Highway 380 to Highway 77 Business Route. There are two major
reasons for wanting to change from two-way to one-way operation.
First, the intersection of I-35 with Highway 360 needs to be signalised. Until the
service roads are one-way, the traffic signal cannot be installed since the signal
heads have to face traffic. The traffic at the above intersection has greatly
increased over the past two years as have the accidents. The State Department of
Highways is interested in installing the signal if the service road problem can be
solved.
Second, the State Department of Highways has funded a study to look at expanding
I-35 to six (6) lanes from Hickory Creek (at Lake Lewisville) north to Highway 77.
For this classification of major highway, the service roads have to be one-way to
allow proper signalisation for capacity at intersections. If the intersections do
not have proper capacity, the entire road will function then at the lower level of
service.
Your input and attendance is requested for the Traffic Safety Commission meeting on
Acril 7. 1986, at 5:30 flat. The Commission has specifically requested that all
interested parties come and give their input through participation in the meeting.
Sincerely,
LC r,.
r
Je ry C rk
City gngineer
se
12594
Traffic Accidents
I-35/Highway 380
Total - 163
100
90
80
00
70 66
'g 60
F4 50
0 41
40 34
30
x 22
20
10
0
1983 19Ai 1fl9! 1986
4 y~ ~ • .rte
1 nl `r~. Ire 4! i '
lot,
N r' ,
moo"
44. 1"
' ' I w
tai J
+ • fiI
~ I .
• p
's
RECEi.~3 1 1 a tgSd
COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENGINEER.OIRECTOR
RO/ERT C, LANIER, CHAMMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MARK 0. OOODE
RASERT H, DEDMAN P. 0. Box 3067
JOHN R. SUTLER, JR. Dallas, Texas 75221-3067
February 6, 1986
IN REPLY REFER f0
FILE NO.
Control 195-3
I.H. 35 Frontage Roads with U.S. 380
In The City of Denton
Denton County
Mr. Jerry r;lark, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Clarke
This office conducted a traffic study of the above intersections in December 1974. This
study indicated that the installation of flashing beacons would be beneficial to
motorists. The flashing beacons were funded and installed by the State and turned on
July 17, 1975. A before and after accident study showed a total of 27 accidents in the
year before July 17, 19751 and 16 accidents in the year after the flashing beacons, were
installed.
In September 1978, the City of Denton requested traffic studies at various locations
including the above intersections. Our letter to the City dated October 3, 1978, stated
that the intersection of I.H. 35 frontage roads with U.B. 380 would not be signalize)
until the frontage roads north of U.S. 380 are converted to one-way operation. This
conversion would require the passage of an ordinance by the City of Denton,
The City responded that because of a subdivision located to the east of I.H. 35 and to
the north of U.S, 380 that only had access to the east frontage road of I.H, 35, they
did not wish to change the frontage roads to one-way operation in this area until
another access to this subdivision was opened.
Our letter to the City dated July 3, 1979, stated that we will be unable to signalize
the interchange at this time, but will restudy the interchange when both frontage roads
are one-way.
t
f
Mr. Jerry Clark, P.R.
February 6, 1986
Page 2
We have recently received new requests to signalize these intersections, and we have
reason to believe that another access to this subdivision was opened in the past few
weeks.
Therefore, we request the CAty of Denton to pass an ordinance at this time changing the
I.H. 35 frontage roads to one-way operation from U.S. 380 to the north intersection with
U.S. 77 Business Route.
When the ordinance is passed, the State will change the signs and pavement markings to /
convert to one-way operation in this section.
We would also, at that time, proceed with the planning and plan preparation to install
full traffic actuated signals at these intersections by contract as soon as yossible.
If we car, be of further assistance to you on this matter, please contact Mr. John H.
Miller, Jr., District Traffic Engineer, at the above address or by telephone at
214/320-6236.
Yours very truly,
Robert, Ynding
District En
M ,
M
Z
~ N
l~
1
- 380 EAST
38p WEST
rr
Y
PROS
.31 a
r
-60
~ t
a 1
I
i
mx~
38n BAST
390 WEST
-Now
. 400 ..fo
~l
' x
Y
YVaST LNG
AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTIN43 THE FRONTAGE ROADS OF I.H. 35 BETWEEN THE
NORTHERN CITY LIMIT LINE AND U,S, 77 TO ONE•wAy VEHICULAR TRAFFIC,
PROHrarTING TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TO NORTH ON THE WESURN FRONTAGE ROAD
AND FROM NORTH TO SOUTH ON EASTERN FRONTAGE ROADS PROVIDING A PENALTY
OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($240.00); PROVIDING A
SEVEWILITY CLAUSES AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the frontage roads of I.H. 35 between the northers, City
limit Line and U.S. 77 are hereby restricted to one-way traffic, so
that the western frontage road between the said limits be limited to
traffic from north to south and the eastern frontage road between
the said limits be limited to traffic from south to north.
SECTION II.
That the frontage roads of I.H. 35 between U.S. 77 and U.S. 380
will be restricted to one-way traffic upon completion of Loop 288.
$ECTIOti z I.
That when signs are in place giving notice thereof, an individual
adjudged guilty of violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars
($200.00).
3£CT*ON IV.
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause,
phrase or word in this ordinance, or applicat;on thereof to any person
or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent ".:risdiction,
such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this ordinance, and the City Council of ~-hc City of Denton, Texas,
hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite
any such invalidity.
SECTIQN V.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
dire^ted i:o cause the n^n*tzr .,e «}"4: ^f A+
4TS•Pk+:-`. +'z..c,..? a a'~xl i; . , TF.'.: r - }v. %Y ~ ^iY?`; '
• twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the Official newsPaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its
passage.
T~
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1983.
~ r
1 WART, MAYOR
CI OF DE ON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
-17 d
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, .EXAS
BY:
OFFXCE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney
FROM., Joe D, Morris, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Ordinance Accepting Drainage Basement Dedicated by
Alt, Al-Khafaji. by Plat
DATE: May 28, 1986
As you know Sunburst Development, Inc. is proposing to use the
natural drainage channel extending from Dallas Drive to Duncan
street to handle storm drainage from its apartment project at
1030 Dallas Drive, known as Sunburst Place II. In order to
properly handle the increased water flow, the drainage channel
will need to be improved. Although the drainage channel has
existed for several years, the property covered by the channel
has never been recorded as a public drainage easement, We are
presently working with Sunburst to obtain the necessary easements.
In 1984, Ali A1-Khafaji platted his property located near Duncan
Street, which included a portion of the drainage channel in
question. By plat, Mr. Al-Khafaji dedicated a fifty-foot drainage
easement to the City. Since a dedication by plat is a mere offer
to dedicate, the City must take some affirmative action in regard
to the offer before the easement becomes a public easement. The
action required to make the dedication affective may be either by
entry and use or by formal acceptance. Since we presently have
litigation pending with Mr. Al-Khafaji concerning required drain-
age improvements on the platted tract, I believe it would be wise
to formally accept, the offered dedication by ordinance before we
enter the channel to awake the necessary improvements, The
proposed ordinance accepting the drainage easement is attached.
Respectfully submitted,
w~ J7 D, MURK15
JDM:js
Attachment
1
f
,
I
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ACCEPTING THE
DEDICATION BY PLAT OF A DRAINAGE BASEMENT FROM ALI AL-KNAFAJI;
AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SBCTiON I.
That the Clty of Denton, Texas, hereby accepts that drains e
i easement as dedicated to the public by the final plat of t9e
AL-KHAFAJI ADDITION, LOT 1, BLOCK It City of Denton, Texas; said
easement being situated in the S. C, Hiram Survey, Abstract No.
i 616, Denton County, Texas, as shown in said final plat filed of
record in Cabinet D, rage 316 of the plat records of Denton
County, Texas, so that hereafter said easement shall be known as
a public drainage easement to be hereafter used by the public
for any purpose permitted by law,
SECTION 11.
I That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
+I PASSED AND APPROVED this the r day of , 1986.
I
RAY STEPHBNS~ MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
i
WILOTTE ALL CITY SECRENRY
CITY OF DENTON,oTEXAS
I
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY; .
f
i
{
R'
R 6 S 0 L U T I 0 N
WHEREAS, Zane Lemon has requested that Pembrooke and Lynhurst
111 Streets at the intersection of Pennsylvania and Longridge, public
streets within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas
be temporarily closed to public vehicular traffic between the
hours of 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m, on July 126 1986, for the purpose
of having a neighborhood block party; and
WHEREAS, Zane Lemon has assured the city Council that all
t residents in such block have agreed to the teuporary closing of
i Pembrooke and Lynhurst Streets at the intersection of Pennsylvania
and Longridge; and
WHEREAS, Zane Lemon has further assured the City Council that
no alcoholic beverages will be served at the above-mentioned block
party;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
SECTION I.
That Pembrooke and Lynhurst Streets at the Intersection of
Pennsylvania and Longridgo, public streets In th:, corporate limits
of the City of Denton, Texas, be temporarily closed to vehicular
traffic from the hours of 4:00 p.m, to 10:00 p,m. on July 12,
1986, for the purpose of having a neighorhood block party.
SECTION It
That the City Manager shall direct the appropriate City
Department to erect barricades at Pembrooke and Lynhurst Streets
at the intersections of Pennsylvania and Longridge at 4:00 p.m. on
July 12, 1986, and to have the same removed at 10:00 p.m, on said
date.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of June, 1986.
t
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLENO CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: 4.14 4'2,w7~k
r.'.,{ p
ism
e145SL
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, on a regular basis the Mayor is asked to approve
• requests to install utility lines within the extraterritorial
jurisdiction of the City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, from time to time, the Mayor of the City of Denton
is also requested to approve "Applications to Name Streets"
within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Denton;
and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council, having discussed these
requests, have determined that these requests should be reviewed
by the City staff prior to execution by the Mayor; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the Mayor of the City of Denton is authorized to
execute, on behalf of the City of Denton, approval for "Requests
for Permission to Install Utility Lines" and "Applications to
Name Roads in Denton County", upon the recommendation of the City
Manager, who shall have his staff review said requests and
applications prior to making his recommendation,
SECTION II.
That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986.
RAY STIPH05, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE LLIN; CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: 6A
f ti a•t .7: 'fTL"y, 3';tsµtr .rte
ED
CITY Of DE#nVN, TJIXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 10201 / TELEPHONE ($1?) 000.0307
ONIce of the Oty Mane0er
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
i'RUM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
llATB: May 28, 1986
SUBJECT: Resolution for Greater Dallas Mobility Study
Attached is a resolution indicating the support of Denton for
the update to the Greater Dallas Mobility Study and the
lobbying efforts that will be made at the State Legislature
during the next session. 1 visited with Vic Boyer of the
Dallas Chamber and he has assured us that the County
Transportation flan as well as Denton's needs would be included
in this lobbying effort. When you met last week with Bob
Yielding, the District Engineer, you said he also indicated
that the way to get more projects was to get approval and
endorsement in regional kinds of efforts as well as our own.
This lobbying effort by the 114etroplex Mayor's Committee will
help us get our projects before the appropriate committees at
the Legislature.
This mobility update and lobbying effort will include a new
transportation update by Huitt-Zollars, a noted traffic firm in
Dallas. Included will be the latest regional transportation
plans from COG. It will also include other studies that are in
process such as the County Transportation Plan and our latest
update from the Development Guide Review Committee if they are
available. The Dallas Chamber has been successful in retaining
Huitt-Zollar's at a very low cost ($50,000) for the entire
study. This firm along with representatives from the Metroplex
Mayor's Committee will be doing the lobbying at the State
Legislature.
The contributions for the mobility update are based on 1980
population and includes approximately 40 cities. Our cost
would be $10335. We would suggest that the funding come from
the existing capital improvements funds.
If you or the Council has any further questions we would be
happy to try and answer then at the meeting on June 3.
c
Assistant City Manager
ji/2929M
v 9'fi rte-'; r'1r -v-... .~-6. r+t tom'.,- rP, ~-rx +s w.ar,*i° +
1445E
IIr
I .
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the Metroplex Mayors have created an executive
committee on State Highway Finanncina, whose primary function
will be to lobby for a greater share of state highway funding
I for the Metroplex; and
WHEREAS, as part of the lobhying effort, it is essential
that the 1982 Greater Dallas Mobility Study be updated to
f include DART, new thoroughfares, fr<eways and tollroads; and
WHEREAS, the Executive Committee has recommended that the
$50,000,00 cost of updating this Mobility Study be apportioned
anions the participating cities on the basis of their 1980
populations; and
WHEREAS, Dentonas resulting share of the cost of updating
this important Study is estimated to be $1,335,00;
NOW9 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of
DBNTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby expresses its support for the
efforts of the Executive Committee on State Highway Financing.
SECTION II.
That the City of Denton hereby agrees to contribute its
proportit~na1 share toward the cost of updating the Greater
Dallas Mobility Study.
SECTION III.
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and
after its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
I
RAY STEPHENSj MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I
ATTEST:
3
CRULOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECKITM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVIT~H, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
BY:
.
APR 0 1986 r1
April 28, 1986 IrV~~fMS10,v -1
Ofifl~„
The Honorable A., Ray Stephens
Mayor, City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mayor Stephens:
Thank you for your attendance (or your representative's attendance) at the
April 24 meeting of the Metroplex Mayors Committee. We were extremely pleased
with the turnout, as it indicates the high level of interest in the region for
solving our transportation problems.
1 would also like to thank you for your city's support for our highway
lahbying efforts, and its commitment to join with other cities to fund the
mobility plan update. Your city's contribution should he forwarded to Vic
Boyer, Manager, Community Affairs, The Dallas Chamber, 1507 Pacific Avenue,
Dallas, Texas, 75201 by May 15. Checks should be made payable to "The Dallas
Chamber - Transportation Funds"
Again, thank you very much for your support. Please find attached:
1. Minutes of the April 25 meeting.
2. A list of funding amounts for each city.
Best regards,
U
John Davis Worley
Chairman
Metroplex Mayors Committee on Highway Finance
Attachments
cc: City Manager
JOW/VB/af
1507 Pacific Avenue 0 Dallas, Texas 75201-3481 0 (214) 954-1111
AprLl 24,.
Mayors: Starke Taylor, Jr. Dallas
Ray Stevins Denton
Ernest Roberts Desoto
Russ Kent Duncanville
Randy Elliott Frisco
Bill Tomlinson Garland
Jerry Debo Grand Prairie
Jim Ledbetter McKinney
Brunhi2to Nystrom Mesquite
Martha Ritter Richardson
Bill Payne ROW1816t
Larry Holden Sachse
Don M. Houseman University Park
D. G. O'Donnell Waxahachie
City Representatives: Jack Hatchell Allen
Mozelle Strain Balch Springs
William Vaughn Balch Springs
Don Penny Carrollton
Bill Lindley Cedar Hill
Paul Veltman Cockrell Hill
Jim Raid Dallas
Lloyd Harrell Denton
Kerry Sweatt Desoto
Robert Warren Frisco
Mack Bouchard Frisco
Wayne Kurfees Garland
Bob Blodgett Grand Prairie
Tony R. Tramel Grand Prairie
Jerry Bevel Irving
Sandy Cash Irving
Charles Owens Lewisville
Don Paschal Moi'inney
Bob Buffington Plano
Bob Hughey Richardson
John Milford Rowlett
Lloyd Henderson Sachse
Robert Sanders Sunnyvale
Robert Sukoll Waxahachie
Other Attendees: Jack Worley Chairman
Clarence Dougherty Collin County
Dave Fox Dallas County
Adlene Harrison DART
Michael Morris NCTCOG
John Richardson The Dallas Chamber
Jim Richards Dallas City Council
Frank Skipper Executive Committee
Forrest Smith The Dallas Chamber
Sid Stahl The Dallas Chamber
Gordon Shunk NCTCOG
Bob Yoilding SDHPT
i
Vic Hover
pctsndin s Marilyn Ha1•
Call to order and IntrodixgtoY~ sntq
1' to order and spoke
mayor Starke Taylor called trio osed ihighway lobbying effort.
about the importance of the pr p
Discussion of the Mobility Pian U date
discussed the history of the Dallas Area
Tack Worley Financing and presented
Executive Committee on State Highway and a proposed schedule
its mission Statement (Attachment I)
for financial contributions from mamber cities (Attachment
II).
3. presentation of the Pro osed Work lan
Larry Cothran of Huitt-Zollars discussed aaproposed planning
and workplan for the mobility update
effort.
4. Appraval of rundi naf•..-rth the Mobili~ y~t'
Mayor Dabo of Gran e moved that the mayors committee:
Grand Prairie t to th
endorse the mot levels p for u date participating articipating and : cities,omml. provided
proposed funding levels
Dallas Chamber will collect the funds Maa Yyidrrebatep
that Th
sec any
The t I
unused positions back to the member cities.
unanimously.
seconded the motion. Notion carried
5. 5tr~ ate~g planning Effort
John Richardson, Chairman of The Dallas Chamber transporta-
tion strategic planning effort, discussed the various goals
ortunities for this $200,000 project to be jointly
and
funded d by The Dallas Chamber, the City of Dallas, and DART.
6. Address b Re resentative David H. Cain
Representative David H. Cain, Chairman - Texas House of
Representatives Transportation mexistingdiscussed
ofh
to lobby highway
to lobby aggressively Y to protect
funding.
7, Adio~nt
CITY 1980 POPULATION PnCLX'P CONTRIBUTION
. AMOUNT
NT
Addison 61620 .37 $185
Allen 8424 .48 $240
Balch springs $390
14,122 ?8
Carrollton 40,673 2.25 $1,125
Cedar Hill 7,043 .39 $195
Coppell 3,839 .21 $105
Dallas 902,184 49.96 $24,980
Denton 48,218 2.67 $1,335
De Soto 160224 089 $445
Duncanville 27,811 1.54 $770
Farmers Branch 26,400 1.46 $730
Flower Mound 3,67; .20 $100
Forney 31065 .17 $85
Frisco 31410 .19 $95
Garland 139,237 7.7 $3,850
Glenn Heights 10438 108 $40
Grand Pra•,rie 71,026 3.93 $1,965
Grapevine 11,943 66 $330
Highland Park 8,917 .49 $245
Hutchins 21960 .16 $80
Irving 1090909 6108 $3,040
3,anoaster $410
14,807 82
Lewiaville 24,511 1.36 $680
McKinney 16,585 .92 $460
Pees ite
Midlothian 67'348 3.73
3,846 .21 $1,865
$105
Murphy 1,119 .06 167
Parker 11196 .07 $67
Plano 72,901 4.04 $2,020
Richardson 72,692 4.03 $2,015
Rockwall 7,090 0.39 $195
Rowlett 7,885 0.44 $220
Sachse 1,719 1110 $50
Seagoville 3,921 .22 $110
Sunnyvale 1,342 ,07 $35
Ths Colany 12,017 .67 $335
University park 220258 1.23 $615
Waxahachie 14,584 .81 $405
Wilmer 21547 .14 $70
1,805,701 $50,070
,j . ~r~ 4 }P r tY' ; S' . r i ,c l . ' ~ 1! i ~A sib l~Ey V y{^f(.!, iLLArt.♦ l>'1'7h 4 +J,.Y. ~~7 if :kldCd~~~~(•:
~.i
F1lef4^+'a l ,T -D"-tea zi:
1
R ES JLU7. I~O0N
WHEREAS. a majority of the Council will be out of the City
of Denton on June 17, 1986, and it is necesss.ry that the Council
meeting for such date be held on June 10, 1986; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ABSOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I.
That the regular Council meeting to be held on June 17, 1086
be held nn June 10, 1986.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 3rd day of June, 1986.
f
RAY STEPH, , KAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ,CITY EfARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
E
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
• Ii CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
`I BY: 1
W01 tow Cood of Ms
C
P. O. 0►IIwN COO Arlinptewi, TAM Te00B-681~~,
APR28
FROM: Gary Bennett, President, NCTCOG DATE: April 25, 1986
TO. Selected County Judges and City Officials in North Central Texas
SUBJECT: Recommendations for non-metro Regional Citi!on Representative to
serve on NCTCOG's Executive Board for 1986-87
A Nominating Committee has been hard at work developing nominations for
the elected positions for NCTCOG's 1986•-87 Executive Board. You were
recently forwarded "a request for nominations" memo and form as part of
that process. Additionally, the Committee has the responsibility of recommending
two regional citizen representatives to the Board - one representing Dallas and
Tarrant Counties, and one represerting the remaining 14 anon-metro counties.
We are soliciting recommendations from selected local government officials for the
non-metro regional citizen position.
For your information, citizens who have filled this position during the last
several years, Include - Ken Ure of Parker County, Herschel Winn of Johnson
County, Jamie Vick Gibson of Parker County, Roy LeTourneau of Rockwall
County, Ted Peters of Hunt County, and Herb Silverberg of Navarro County.
Therefore, if you •nish to recommend a prospective citizen appointee from your
county to serve on the 1986-87 Executive Board, please forward your suggestion
to me to be considered by NCTCOG's Nominating Committee, A form is enclosed
for your convenience.
Any citizen is eligible to serve, however, the citizen representative recommended
should be a person of vision with a broad and objective understanding of the
problems,
governments, and economics of the region. Care should be taken
not to recommend citizens who would represent only local or special interests.
t,
Thank you for your cooperation In this Important undertaking. We will look
Iforward to a recommendation from you, If you have a suggestlon, we would
appreciate hearing from you as soon as possible.
GB:cf r i e t
Enc.
C"*mm*A Tm of aft Flaps D" Dui 04 Waft "0 81 ?M01.&%0
r,R
7, 1
of £ r
FROM: DATE: _r,_
ame
to
oca GoverW-ment Represented
TO: Gary Bennett, President, NCTCOG - Chairman, Nominating Committee
SUBJECT: Recommendation for NCTCOG non-metro Regional Citizen Representative
to the 1986-87 Executive Board
I would like to recommend:
Name
Business or Professional Xffillation
I Mailing dress
to be considered by the Nominating Committee for service on the NCTCOG 1986-87
Executive Board.
Additional supporting comments:
Signed:
(Please attach other information pertinent to this nomination.)