Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-04-1986 AcaWft *d i0o 4tA) C3~ GouWC.~ 4 m Rte. i9,% 1 . AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March 4, 1986 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March 49 198b, at 5334 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be nonsideredt 5t30 p.m. 1. Receive a resolution from the City of Gaiasville to the City of' Denton Fire Department in appreciation of their assistance. 2. Discussion of request of Miller of Texas, Inc. for anaexati.ln of approximately 301.913 acres located between I-J5E and FM 426 (East McKinney) aad situated in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and the W, Durham Survey, Abstract 330 (A-38). 3. Discussion of a "no smoking" ordinance for the City of Denton. 4. Discussion of landscape/tree ordinance requirements. 5. Receive a presentation by the North Texas Fair Association of plans for relocation and construction of an Exposition Center. 61 Executive Sessiont A. Legal Matters Uuder Sec. 2(a), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. b252-17 V.A,T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S, Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March 40 19tsb0 at 7x00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be consideredt 7300 p.m, Consent Agandat Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will ba strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. City of Denton City Couucil Agenda March 4, 1986 Page 2 Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be appruved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 5.A9 and 5.B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #9576 - 4/0 Cable 2. Bid 09578 - Filter Media for Water Plant 3. Bid #9580 - Insecticides and herbicides 4. Bid 09582 - Water Slide 5. Bid 09584 Automotive/Industrial Batteries 6. Bid 09586 - 15' Hydraulic Mower 7. Bid #9588 - Pavement Marker 8. Bid #9589 - Refuse Packer Body 9. Bid 09590 - Police Sedans 10. Purchase Order 072232 to T.K.O. Equipment Company in the amount of $12,000.00 B. Final Payments 1. Bid 09433 - Oversize Participation Payment, Parkway Plaza Phase 1, Gunning Development corporation, 8" to 27" water line. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 2. Bid #9298 - Project Finalization - Panhandle Drainage Improvements 3. Bid 09531 - Oversize water line participation to Tony Raposa, Greenway Plaza 8" to 12" in the amount of $11,914.50. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 4. Bid #9410 - Spencer/Woodrow Connection 5. Bid #9410 - FY 85 Section A Capital Iaprovement Waterlines, - Dickerson Construction Co. in the amount of $24,249.53 ('The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) Y „City of Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1986 Page 3 C. Tax Refunds 1. Consider a tax refund to Denton Savings and Loan in the amount of $3,143.28 2. Consider a tax refund to Garland Cates in the amount of $961.76 D. Plats and Replats: 1. Approval of preliminary plat of Cooper Landing, Sect±on III, lots 1-4, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the Industrial School Addition, Lot 8R, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of preliminary replat of the summit Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 'l. Consider approval of a request by central business district representatives to close the 100 block of North Elms West Oak, North Locust and West Hickory (The Square) and Hickory from Bell to the railroad tracks on June 21, 1986 from 6:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. for County Seat Saturday. 3. Consider approval of a request by the Denton Lion's Club to solicit funds on March 15 and March 16 for the Lion's Organ and Lye Bank of Texas. 4. Public Hearings: A. S-186. Petition of Terry Walker, representing Robert Caraway, requesting a specific use permit on property presently toned Neighborhood Service (NS). The property is located at 1305 1-35E and shorn in the E. Puchalski Survey, Abstract 996. If approved, the specific use permit would allow the operation of an antique and coll'ctible shop in a neighborhood service zoning district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda . March 4, 1986 Pala 4 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a specific use permit at 1305 I-35E. B. Z-17b0. Petition of Rick Horn, representing H. loss Perot, Jr., requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 25.6 acre tract located on the south side of U.S. Highway 77 at its intersection with proposed State Highway Loop 288. The property is further described as a tract in the Nathan Wade Survey, Abstract 1407. If the request is approved, the following retail and office land uses will be permitted: office, hotel, bank, movie theatre, gasoline service station, public or private park or open space, parking lot or garage, medical center or hospital, convenience store, retail shops, and shopping center. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Z-1783. Petition of Tim Horner requesting a clanga in zoning from the agricultural (A) . classification to the light industrial (LI) district on a 3.5 acre tract located on the south side of U.S. Highway 380 approximately 1,500 feet east of Mooch Branch Road. The property is further described as a tract in the William Bryan Survey, Abstract 128. If the request is approved, the property may be utilized for any use permitted in the light industrial district by the City of Denton zoning ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on a 3.5 acre tract located on the south side of U.S. Highway 380 approximately 11500 feet east of Mooch Branch Road. D. Z-1788. Petition of Stephen Des Jardine, representing the James M. Brown Company, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 74.97 acre tract located at the northeast corner of the Interstate Highway 35N service road and Payne Drive. The property is further described as a tract in the Prances Batson Survey, Abstract 43. The following land rae$ are proposed for the j developments City of Denton City Council Agenda !larch 4, 1986 Page 5 Office - 16.75 acres Neighborhood Service - 4.00 acres Cluster Housing - 219 units on 18.34 acres with a density of 11.9 units per acre Single Family - 91 units on minimum 10,000 square foot lots on 27.74 acres with a density of 3.3 units per acre Single Family - 11 units on minimum 16,000 square foot lots on 6 acres with a density of 1.9 units per acre Park - 2.17 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission has no recommendation.) E. Hold a public hearing concerning the request of Teasley Road Associates and the City of Denton for proposed annexation of approxiaately 125.25 acres beginning at Kings Road and proposed Loop 2d8, south of Oak Bend Estates, and south of Silverdome Road (A-33). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase (of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state _law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving au easement abandonment (Southridge Village Shopping Center and J.W. Erwin deplat). (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval). D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an easement abandonment (Al McNatt Property). (Public Utilities Board recommends approval). E. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plitu annexing 765.1 acres situated in the N.E.P. & P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 1470; the E.F. Anderson Survey, Abstract 16; the E.A. Orr Survey, Abstract 983; the G.W. Anderson Survey, Abstract 12; the M.E.P. & P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 1502; and the T & P Survey, Abstract 1307, Denton County, Texas; being part of a tract known as the Golden Hoof Ranch and beginning south of U.S. Highway 3800 east of FM 1560 and west of Egan Road (A-32). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1986 page ti F. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan instituting annexation of approximately 614.6 acres being part of the E. Pickett Survey, Abstract 1018, the N. Britton Survey, Abstract 51, the J. Rogers Survey, Abstract 10849 the J. Rogers Survey, Abstract 10851 and the B. Rogers Survey, Abstract 11010 and beginning north of Old Alton Estates, south of Ryan Road, vest of FM 21810 and east of the G.C. 4 S.F. Railroad (A-30)., (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) G. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning the request of Bellaire West Partners for annexation of approximately 103.2 acres beginning adjacent and north of Jim Christal Road, south of U.S. Highway 380 West, approximately 1/2 mile east of Egan Road and 3/4 mile west of Underwood Road (A-34). H. Consider adoption of an ordinance settlug a date, time and place for public hearings on the . proposed annexation of certain property as described in exhibit "A" attached hereto by the City of ,Denton, Texas, and authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearings. 1. Adoption %f an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 85-119 to provide for a corrected legal description of the property thereby rezoned; and providing for an effective date (Z-1745). J. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the single family (SF-7) classification to the planned development (PD) district to permit the construction of office buildings on a 1.2 acre tract located on the east side of Carroll Boulevard approximately 500 feet south of Eagle Drive (Z-1764). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Resolution: A. Consider approval of a resolution accepting the donation of $120000.00 from Mr. Clordie Branch for the express purpose of aiding and contributing to the construction of a community recreational center. B. Consider approval of a resolution closing Oak Street (north side of the square) between Elm and Locust on April 18, 1986 from 7:30 p.m. until 12:00 midnight for a Sesquicentennial dance. I, . City P,f Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1986 Page 7 C. Consider approval of s resolution temporarily closing a portion of Pry Street between Oak Street and Hickory Street from d:00 a.a, until 6:30 p.m. on April 19, 1986 for the annual Spring lensissance. D. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a pipe line license agreement between the City of Denton and the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company. 71 official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal ;Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 81 New Busines;: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 9. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S, D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, o day of , 1986 at o'clock RETAIL? 2071C AGENDA EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March 4, 1986 The emergency necessitating this supplemental agenda. being the urgent necessity to honor Dr. Huey in conjunction with the dedication of the new Library at Texas Woman's University. 1. Consider approval of a resolution in appreciation of Dr. Huey and declaring March 7, 1986 as Mary Evelyn Blagg Huey Day in the City of Denton. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin boa d at the City Hall of the City woL/Denton, Texas, on the day of 1986 at o'clock CITY-SECRETARY a 2087C AGENDA EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March 4, 1986 The emergency necessitatirq this supplemental agenda being the urgent necessity to honor Dr. Huey in conjunction with the dedication of the new Library at Texas Woman's University. 1. Consider approval of a resolution in appreciation of Dr. Huey and declaring March 7, 1986 as Mary Evelyn Blagg Huey Day in the City of Denton. C E R T I F I C A 'P E 1 certify that- tae above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1986 at o'clock (a.m.) ZP.m. CITY SECRETARY 2087C AGENDA EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March 4, 1986 The emergency necessitating this supplemental agenda being the urgent necessity to proceed with the development of a multipurpose exposition facility, 1. Consider approval of a resolution in support of the North Texas Fair Association's concept of the relocation of the existing fairgrounds and the construction of a multipurpose exposition center. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin boar at the Cit Hall of the City of De'n`ton, Texas, on the day of 1986 at O'clock (a.m.) CITY- TS7,CRET-KRY 2087C/z AGENDA EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March 4, 1986 The emergency necessitating this supplemental agenda being the urgent necessity to proceed with the development of a multipurpose exposition facility. 1. Consider approval of s. resolution i,n Vlapporc of the North Texas Fair Association's concept of the relocation of the existing fairgrounds and the construction of a multipurpose exposition center. C E K T I F I C A T E I corti£y that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1986 at 01cl(•ck (a.m.) (p.m.) MYY- SECRETARY 2,8i C/2 f C~ AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL March 4, 1986 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council On Tuesday, March 4, 1986) at p.m. in the Civil Defiqnee Room of the • Municipal building at which the following items will be ' considered: 5:30 p.m. 11 Receive a resolution from the City of Gaineville to the City of Denton Fire Department in appreciation of their assistance. 21 Discussion of request of Miller of Texas, Inc. for annexation of approximately 301.913 acres located between I-35E and FH 426 (East McKinney) and situated in the uideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and the W. Durham Survey, Abstract 330 (A-38). 30 Discussion of a "no waoking" ordinance for the City of Denton. 4, Discussion of landscape/tree ordinance requirements. 50 Receive a presentation by the North Texas Fair Association of plans for relocation and construction of an Exposition Center. 6. Executive Sessions A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Keel Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A,T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 0. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T,S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, March 40 196b, at 7s00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considereds 7sOO p.m. 11 Consent Agendat Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorises the City Manager or his designee to implement each it** in accordance with the Staff recommendations. City of Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1986 Page 2 Listed below are bids and purchase orders to lie approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 5.A, and 5.B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orderss 1. Bid #9576 - 4/0 Cable 2. Bid #9578 - Filter Media for Water Plant 1. Bid #9580 - Insecticides and herbicides 4. Bid #9582 - Water Slide 5. Bid #9584 - Automotive/Industrial Batteries 6. Bid #9586 - 15' Hydraulic Mower 7. Bid #9588 - Pavement Marker 8. Bid #9589 - Refuse Packer Body 9. Bid 09590 - Police Sedans 10. Purchase Order #72232 to T.K.O. Equipment Company in the amount of $12,000.00 B. Final Payments 1. Bid #9433 - Oversize Participation Payment, Parkway Plaza Phase 1, Dunning Development corporation, 8" to 27" water line. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 2. Bid #9298 - Project Finalization - Panhandle Drainage Improvements 3. Bid 09531 - Oversize water line participation to Tony Raposa, Greenway Plaza 8" to 12" in the amount of $11,914.50. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 4. Bid #9410 - Speucer/Woodrow Connection 5. Bid 09470 - FY 85 Section A Capital Improvement Waterlines, - Dickerson Construction Co. in the amount of $24,249.53 (The Public utilities Board recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1986 Page 3 C. Tax Refunds 1. Consider a tax refund to Denton Savings and Loan in the amount of $3,143.28 21 Consider a tax refund to Garland Cates in the amount of $961.76 D. Plata and Replatss 1. Approval of preliminary plat of Cooper Landing, Section III, Lots 1-4, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the Industrial ScLool Addition, Lot 8R, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of preliminary replat of the summit Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider approval of a request by central busineas district representatives to close the 100 block of North Elms West Oak, Korth Locust and West Hickory (The Square) and Hickory from Bell to the railroad tracks on June 21, 1986 from 6s0O a.m. until 8t00 p.m. for County Seat Saturday. 3, Consider approval of a request by the Denton Lion's Club to solicit funds on March 15 and March 16 for the Lion's organ and Eye Bank of Texas. 4. Public Hearings: A. S-186. Petition of Terry Walker, representing Robert Caraway, requesting a specific use permit on property presently zoned Neighborhood Service (NS). The property is located at 1305 1-35E and shown in the L, Puchalski Survey, Abstract 996. If epproved, the specific use permit would allow the operation of an antique and collectible shop in a neighborhood service :toning district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) i City of Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1986 Page 4 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a specific use permit at 1305 I-355. B. Z-1780. Petition of Rick Horn, representing H. Rose Perot, Jr., requesting a change in zoning from -&he agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 25.b acre tract located on the south side of U.S. Highway 77 at its intersection with proposed State Highway Loop 286. The property is further described as a tract in the Nathan Wade Survey, Abstract 1407. If the request is approved, the following retail and office land uses will be permitted: office, hotel, bank, movie theatre, gasoline service station, public or private park or open space, parking lot or garage, medical center or hospital, convenience store, retail shops, and shopping center. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Z-1783, Petition of Tim Horner requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) clasaification to the light industrial (LI) district on a 3.5 acre tract located on the south side of U,S. Highway 380 approximately 1,500 feet east of Mascii Branch Road. The property is further described as a tract in the William Bryan Survey, Abstract 128. If the request In approved, the property may be utilized for any use permitted in the light industrial district by the City of Denton zoning ordinance. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in coning on a 3.5 acre tract located on the south side of U.S. Highway 380 approximately 10500 feet east of Masch Branch Road. D. Z-1788, Petition of Stephen Des Jardins, representing the James M. Brown Company, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 74.97 acre tract located at the northeast corner of the Interstate Highway 35N service road and Payne Drive. The property is further described as a tract in the Francis Batson Survey, Abstract 43. The following land uses are proposed for the developments r ;ss~- rm 3 S 7`i9{'.fi..h3f err? e.. ,..r. _ City of Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1966 Page 5 Office - 16.75 acres Neighborhood service - 4.00 acres Cluster Housing - 219 units on 18.34 acres with a density of 11.9 units per acre Single Family - 91 units on minimum 10,000 square foot lots on 27.74 acres with a density of 3.3 units per acre Single Family - 11 units on minimum 16,000 square foot lots on 6 acres with a density of 1.9 units per acre Park - 2.17 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission has no recommendation.) E. Hold a public heating concerning the request of Teasley Road Associates and the City of Denton for proposed annexation of approximately 125.25 acres beginning at Kings Road and proposed Loop 2d8, south of Oak Band Estates, and south of Silverdome Road (A-33). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 51 A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an easement abandonment (Southridge Village Shopping Center and J.W. Erwin Keplat). (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval). D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an easement abandonment (Al McNott Property). (Public Utilities Board recommends approval). E. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing 765.1 acres situated in the H.E.P. & P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 1470; the E.F. Anderson Survey, Abstract 16; the E.A. Orr Survey, Abstract 983; the G.W. Anderson Survey, Abstract 12; the M,E.P. & P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 1502; and the T & P Survey, Abstract 1302, Denton County, Texas; being part of a tract known as the Golden Hoof Ranch and beginning south of U.S. Highway 380, east of FM 1360 and west of Egan Road (A-32). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1986 Page 6 F. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan instituting annexation of approximately 614.6 acres being part of the E. Pickett Survey, Abstract 1018, the N. Britton Survey, Abstract 510 the J. Rogers Survey, Abstract 1084, the J. Rogers Survey, Abstract 1085, and the B. Rogers Survey, Abstract 1101, and beginning north of Old Alton Estates, south of Ryan Road, went of FM 1181, and east of the G.C. & S.F. Railroad (A-30). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) G. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning the request of Bellaire West Partners for annexation of approximately 103.2 acres beginning adjacent and north of Jim Christal Road, south of U.S. Highway 380 West, approximately 1/2 mile east of Egan Road and 3/4 mile west of Underwood Road (A-34). H. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings on the proposed annexation of certain property as described in exhibit "A" attached hereto by the City of Denton, Texas, and authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearings. 1. Adoption of an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 85-119 to provide for a corrected legal description of the property thereby rezoned and providing for an effective date (Z-1745). J. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the single family (SF-7) classification to the planned development (PD) district to permit the construction of office buildings on a 1.2 acre tract located on the east aide of Carroll Boulevard approximately 500 feet south of Eagle Drive (Z-1764). (The Planning and Zoning Commissioa recommends approval.) 60 Resolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution accepting the donation of $12,000.00 from Mr. C,tordle Branch for the express purpose of aiding and contributing to the construction of a community recreational center. B. Consider approval of a resolution closing Oak Street (north side of the square) between Blm and Locust on April 18, 1986 from 700 p.m. until 12sU0 midnight for a Sesquicenternial dance. w y _ • ...s s-t .R v ..sr . !ALf'•(T!`~T-.t vc-~yc yp{ City of Denton City Council Agenda March 4, 1986 Page 7 C. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing a portion of Fry Street between Oak Street and Hickory Street froJ 8:00 a.m. until 6:30 p.m. on April 19, 1986 for the annual Spring Renaissance. D. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a pipe line license agreement between the City of Denton and the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company. 7. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 8. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 91 Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(6), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under See. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1986 at o'clock CITY IC E ARY 2071C VffR: 03/04/" am COGNSIL Won ZQM TO: Kayor and Kswbers of the City Council * FRAM: Lloyd Karrell, City Kanager SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF REQUEST OF KILLER OF TEXAS, INC. FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROUKAT[LY 302.913 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN I-356 AND P.K. 426 (E. KCKINNEY) AND SITUATED IN THE GIDBON WALKER ESURVBY, ABSTRACT 1330, AND THE W. DURHAM SURVEY, ABSTRACT 330 (A-38) RECOMUNDATION: None available. BURNAM This is the site of the proposed extension of the Lakeview DOvelop wat concept. Kited use PD zoning will be requested, but a formal zoning petition has not been subs►itted. BACKGROUND: Killer of Texas, Inc. informad staff of their intentions to request annexation and zoning of this tract when the Lakeview concept was first discussed. PIMM, DEPARTKLNT8 OR GROUPS AFFECTED: FISCAL. IMACT i Undetermined Res lly su ted: Lloy Harrell Prejjarsd by City Manager David Ellison Senior Planner App gfg~~- Jsff Key Director of Planning aM DevOl,-stmt 01350 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March 4, 1986 SUBJECT: Discussion of Request of Miller of Texas, Inc., for annexation of approximately 301.913 acres located between I-35E and F.M. 426 (E. McKinney) and situated in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and the W. Durham Survey, Abstract 330 (A-38) SUMMARY: Miller of Texas, Inc., is requesting annexation for the purpose of petitioning for additional mixed use planned development (PD) zoning. A map is attached showing the relationship of the subject property to existing city limits of Denton Shady Shores and Corinth. The Denton-Shady Shores and Denton-Corinth extra- territorial jurisdiction lines are also shown on attached maps. The desire for additional mixed use PD zoning for this property was expressed when plans for the Lakeview development concept were originally conceived and discussed. The development review committee has held a preliminary meeting or pre-design conference based on the attached concept plan. A formal change in zoning petition has not been submitted for the property, but staff has seen "alternative" concepts devised by Miller of Texas and representatives. A 1.97 acre portion of this request is being annexed involuntarily= negotiations are reportedly underway for the purchase of this property. ACTION REQUIRED: Determine whether to begin the annexation process. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to begin process 2. Deny request to begin process ATTACHMENTS: 1. Maps 2. Land Use Concept p~ David Ell son Senior Planner 1464a 3 ~ r ~Aa Aitr L~MIXfL.1.A. x: :1 ~ oENTON-s sNORE9 A43A ENT E Ordlno o I~~-9s 1974 01INTON-00HINTH • or •H0e428 elowei AGREEMENT LINE ~1►~♦ Vol. 916 9r , qa ~a t 0 ensan otf y Uenlts DENTON CITY LIMITS and E.TnJ. Annexation Location Mop eNlss~o9>w.wx 0 fof4 RD AJ .k • r ~kr ~sw~*.wi w r. . i . . wr.. •wwwr. AQR Nr UNf w+ V ~ p.1 1T MR= Cw4n sh City Un"s CORINTH CITY LIMITS and E.T.J. Annexation Location Map wAet«or~.x 2 of 4 *~csrr~a~ JaN ~ Z zt : ..s= tiI i 3 ~ • AKb LOW18VILLN AGAEEMENT LINE I Qrdlnln0• 74 i August 20, 1;74 ; ,rte WARDS R w P w I I ii .w/sstnn W 0 0 H~A mamma 00^0 =SWOON Shady Shows 0111ey UmI64 SHADY SHORES CITY LIMITS and R.T.J. Annexation Looablon Map AmItwoxi:x 3 of 4 170 k I~ o ~A r , AK■ 6i[WISVIILLA r AGREEMENT LINE ordinance 0 74-33 August 20, 1974 x x.; f} H x AGREEMENT 1N o. 025, g. 447 Lenten City LWts Shady Shares City Limits' Corinth City Limits COMPOSITE CITY LIMITS and E.T.J. Annexation Location Map arn~o~srrws~ A1'IC~) n 4 of 4 own RBfEIV190 JAN .1 i 1986 ' Yil/NO.OL. ! I OOd~ORV'I/ \ L7v ~ I I X644 f - / WMII M_hf Iv llll r'/ 1 / `Y f~ - 1 I I i CJIV OF (00100N, i } LNWIRM "U&L 114 C naq i rN►w [~G°aal~Nl~ MtiI o®v®a.oa~oa~wev ooatooMPT J "i a TWA",, MtTION FOR ANNUATION 39 TO To PLANNING AND TONING COlMIASION AND CITY COUNCIL or TH3 CITY OF DRUM, TRxAS The ndersi WA does bareb petitio for annexation of ,.,3a-5 acres located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of t City of Denton, Texts. The pro ty is sore particularly described in the attached survey description and shown on the attached snap. r'ae undersigned also certifies that the following required information ooaceenicg the land and its inhabitants is reasonably accurate and assume responsibility for completion of said information prior to scheduled action on the request by the City of Denton. 1. Is petition being initiated by owner(s) or majority ek registered voters in area of request? Yes No If no, what is the status of the applicant? 2. How many dwelling un}.ts are located within the area requested for annexation? ~k _iS 3. How many businesses or nonresidential land uses are located within the area of the request? ~C Please provide a general description of these land uses including the new(@) of businesses, if known Does area of request include any territory within the city limits or extra- territorial jurisdiction of another city? Yee No > C - 5. Rstimated population of the area of request. _ Adults Children Number of registered voters? 6. At the tine of this petition, have any other annexation procedures been initiated for all or any part of the area requested in this petition? Yes No ~Z<If yes, please explain the procedures begun and their status. 7. Dote a water supply district lie within the boundaries of the area proposed for annexation? Yes No 8. What zoning, if any, of er than r ultural (A), is being requested under separate petition? 21j: -CJ _g e How much of territory proposed for annexation 1Q included in coning petition?~ a~ rra; Ft°'£~"._'~;.. +ro-. ,r-~r~,, ~ ~ :~v,'tr,-_ emu: ~c r'. .u n . s r • -a~',=.-.vs~~~++~~.a.. .e.' Patittoa far Anowtation Page I" , 9. What i~ the r ose of xatioa D'O w C 4r~ 10. Planed load use (if coning U being requested): Proposed Unit Category i Total Per Acre And/Or Proposed Aorsaae jguare tootgn a. Single family detached b. Single family attached (townhouses, cluster, eto.) a. Attached patio/garden/zero lot line d. Duplex e. Multi-fMily f. Office S. Neighborhood service h. General Retail 1. Commeroial 3. light industrial k. Heavy Industrial Proposed use(s) if specific use permit or planned development (PD) being requested. it. Have petitioner(s) familiarised themselves with the official annexation policy, land use policies, and the standard municipal service plan of the City of Denton? Yes No Name of Owner(s) elephone Signature(s) Date Address(es) is .C.S ~ Q 2 aa~ 1 If petitioner is not the owner of the property% Sous Petitioner Name(s) Telephone ( } Signature(s) Date Address(es) Rield Notes and Location Map for area proposed for annexation must be submitted along with completed petition before prooess begins. 08623 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Robert B. Hunter, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance Prohibiting Smoking DATE: February 14, 1986 At your request, we have prepared a draft of a proposed ordi- nance prohibiting smoking patterned after the Dallas ordinance now in effect. The provisions of this ordinance are summarized in the attached memorandum to you from City Attorney Debra A. Drayovitch dated January 9, 1986. Some significant concepts embodied in the ordinance are: 1. The City/County Health Department is designated to administer and enforce the ordinance. This seems logical inasmuch as this is a health ordinance and most complaints are likely to emanate from atrons of food establishments, familiar terri- to_., for City County Health Officers. However, the Department is not required to be a watchdog for individual violators. Once the Department has insured that the affected establish. ments have proper signs and the required written policies, violations of the ordinance will be processed only on the basis of individual complaints from citizens. 2. While the ordinance prohibits smoking in retail or service establishments serving the general public, and in public primary or secondary sch,,)ols, enclosed theaters, libraries and museums, it is a defonse to prosecution that the person was smoking in an administrative area. That term is defined as an area not generally accessible to the public and includes individual offices, stockrooms, employee lounges, meeting rooms, etc. Donald Postell, Assistant City Attorney for Dallas and author of the Dallas ordinance, informs us that the intent of this provision was to avoid stringent regulation of the work force at this time and to direct regulation at areas of public (as opposed to employee) use. 3. With regard to facilities owned by the City, the ordinance would prohibit smoking in "public service areas" which are defined as any area, other than administrative areas, to which the general pu;jlic routinely has access for municipal a D 1"'~' , • ar'°_ +v.. x: fi5 x- x. r x °c3 rw4 ~ b'ri . *.a.. t~"TA.F'~'-~[{4f'?fi. ,,c ' eR.y.~" Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council February 14, 1956 Page Two services or which are designated as public service areas in a written policy prepared in compliance with the ordinance. In addition, and more restrictive than in paragraph 2 above, smoking would also be prohibited in conference rooms and meet- ing rooms. Please note that this provision (Sec. 13-41(a)(3)7 contains blanks for exempted areas. Dallas had excluded Love Field, the Dallas Convention Center, Reunion Arena and common areas of city-owned theaters, concert halls and cultural facilities from the provisions of this section. There may be certain facilities you wish to specifically exclude. 4. The penalty for failing to prepare and implement written policies and designate smoking and nonsmoking areas with appropriate signs is a fine of not lass than $50.00 nor more than $500.00. The penalty for individuals violating the no smokin provisions of the ordinance is a fine of not less than $15.00 nor more than $200.00. 5. We have inserted the usual clause with respect to the effec- tive date of the ordinance and publication of the caption and penalty clause. If you wish to retain the different penalties in the Dallas ordinance, I recommend the entire ordinance be published. You may also wish to consider a later effective date after publication to allow time for various establish- ments to comply with written policy formulation and posting requirements. Respectfully submitted, RRH:js xc: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager Attachment APPROVED: .La&&O plg~ u e^~m..: :?..n+:-•: ;s+' q~'' ~ _ r,~- ...~.rw-.r ~ 3 r. r, ~;rsr ,jc'~,: r'"+`~' ~ 'i'.'s' e.4~..f t, 19- N0. AN ORDINANCE ADDING ARTICLE IV, "SMOKING," TO CHAPTER 13 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS, TO BE COMPRISED OF SECTIUNS L3-40 THROUGH 13-45; DESIGNAj1UG PORTIONS OF CERTAIN RETAIL AND SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, AND FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AS NONSMOKING AREAS; PROVIDING SIGN RrgUIREMENTS; PROVIDING POLICIES MIMPLSTANDARDS FOR NONSMOKING EMENTI G THIS ARTICLE; PROHIBITING REQUIRING IN DESIONATED NONSMOKING AREAS; PROVIDING EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING PENALTItS, PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the smoking of tobacco or weeds or other plant products has been demonstrated to have a detrimental effect on not only the smoker but others in close proximity to the smoker; and WHEREAS, it is the right of citizens to be able to choose for themselves whether to smoke either actively or passively; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City to encourage food establishments which have enclosed dining areas to provide adequate seating for those patrons who prefer a smoke-free environment; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Denton have demonstrated a desire to voluntarily comply with City ordinances which procect public health and welfare; and WHEREAS regulations regarding smoking can and should be enforced only on a complaint basis; and WHEREAS, such enforcement would be effective without substantial additional cost to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION 1. That Chapter 13 of the Coue of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended by addingg a new Article IV, Sectiuns 13-40 through 13-45, to read as follows: ARTICLE IV. SMOKING Sec. 13.40, Definitions (1) "Administrative Ares" means the area of an establishment not generally accessible to the public, including but not limited to individual offices, stockrooms, employee lounges, or meeting rooms. (2) "Director" means the Director of the City/County Health Department designated to enforce and administer this Articlo or the Director's designated representative. (3) "Food Establishment" means aay operation defined as such in Section 11-20 of the Denton City Code. ow f mw tr (4) "Hospital" means any institution that pruvides medical, surgical, and overnight facilities for patients. establishment ilwhich dsells r goods or Establishments" means any public. administrativec area, to which theanggeneral public other has access for municipal services or which is designated a public service area in a written policy prepared in compliance with this Article. Sec. 13-41. Smoking Prohibited in Certain Public Areas. (a) A person commits an offense if he smokes or possesses a hurning tobacco, weed or other plant product in any of the following indoor or enclosed areas: (1) an elevator used by the public; (2) a hospital or nursing home corridor providing direct access to patients' rooms; (3) any conference room, meeting room, or public service area of any facility owned, operated, or managed by the city; but does not include (4) any retail or service establishment serving the Fseneral public, including, but not limited to, any department store, grocery store, or drug store; (5) An area marked with a no smoking sign in accordance with subsection (b) of this section by the owner or person in control of a hospital, nursing home, or retail, or service establishment serving the general public; or (6) any facility of a public primary or secondary school; or an enclosed theater, movie house, library, or museum. (b) The owner or person in control of an establishment in which smoking is prohibited by subsection (a) of this section shall post a conspicuous sign at the main entrance to the establishment. The owner or person in control of an establishment in which smoking is prohibited in a specified area shall post a conspicuous sign at the entrance to the area. The sign shall contain the words "No Smoking, City of Denton Ordinance, the universal symbol for no smoking, or other language that clearly prohibits smoking. (c) Every hospital shall; (1) allow all patients, prior to elective admission, to choose to be in a no smoking patient room; and (2) require that employees or visitors obtain express approval from all patients in a patient room prior to smoking. PAGE 2 r'z r i s rr '.a ..r,„N,F> .r _ r K trr+,~,. .y~ (d) the owner or person in control of an establishment or area described in subsection (a)(4) or (a)(6) of this Section may designate an area, including but not limited to lobbies, meeting rooms, or waiting rcoms, as a smoking area; provided tnat the designated smoking area may not include: (1) the entire establishment; (2) cashier areas or over the counter sales areas; or (3) the viewing area of any theater or movie house. (a) It is a defense to prosecution under this section if the person was smoking in a location that was: (1) a designated smoking area of a facility or establishment described in subsection (a)(4) or (a) (6) of this section which is posted as a smoking area with appropriate signs; (2) an administrative area or office of an establishment described in subsection (a)(4) or (a)(6) of this section; (3) a retail or service establishment serving the general public with less than 500 square feet of a public showroom or so:vice space or having only one employed on duty, unless posted as a designated nonsmoking area In accordance with subsection (a)(5) of this section; or (4) a retail or service establishment which is primarily anga ed in the sale of tobacco, tobacco products or smoking implements. Sec. 13-42. Written Policy Required. 'rho owner or person in control of any Eacility or area designated as a no smoking area in section 13-42 (a)(3) or (4) of this Article shall: (a) have and implement a written policy on smoking which conforms to this Article; and (b) make the policy available for inspection by the Director. Sec. 13-43. Establishments. (a) A food establishment which has indoor or enclosed dining areas shall provide separate indoor or enclosed dining areas for smoking and nonsmoking patrons. (b) A nonsmoking area must: (1) be separated, where feasible, from smoking areas by a minimum of four feet of contiguous floor space; (2) be ventilated, where feasible, and situated so that air from the smoking area is not drawn into or across the nonsmoking area; a PAGE 3 71 ,T(3) be clearly designated by appropriate signs visible ::o patrons within the dining area indicating that the area is deal.gnated nonsmoking; and (4) have ash trays or other suitable containers for extinguishing smoking materials at the perimeter of the nonsmoking area. (c) Each food establishment which has a dining area shall: (1) have and implement a written policy on smoking which conforms to this Article; (2) make the policy available for inspection by the Director; and (3) have signs at the establishment's entrance indicating that nonsmoking seating is available. (d) Nondining areas of any food establishment affected by this section to which patrons have general access, including, but not limited to, food order areas, food service areas, restrooms, and cashier areas, shall be designated as nonsmoking areas. (a) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the food establishment is: (1) an establishment which has indoor seating arrangments for less than 50 patrons; or (2) an establishment in which more than 70 percent of its annual gross sales is from the sale of alcoholic beverages; or (3) a physically separated bar area of a food establish- ment otherwise regulated, Sec, 13 44. Smoking in Food Establishments. A arson commits an offense if he smokes or possesses a burn- ing tobacco, weed, or other plant product in an area of a food establishment designated as nonsmoking. Sec. 13-45. Penalties. (a) Any person violating section 13-41(b), 13-41(c), 13.42, or 13-43 of this Article, upon conviction, is punishable by a fine of not lees than Fifty Dollars ($50.00) nor more than Five Hundred Dollars (#500.00). Artl.cbe, Anerson conviction violating punsection ishablu 13-41(a by 4 a (fine of lnot 4le s of this than Twenty-five Dollars ($21.00) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.gG): SECTION II, That this ordinance does not require the owner, operator, manager or any employee of an establishment to report a violation or to take any action against any individual violating section 13.41(a) or 13-44 of Article IV, Chapter 13 of the Denton City Code as amended. Complaints against individuals violating the PACE 4 77 r- is aforementioned sections shall be made to the City/County Health Department for investigation and referral, if warranted, to the Office of the City Attorney for prosecution, SECTION III, That if in section, t ord+inanceonorparagraph' sentence, clause, phrase person or circumstance is held invalid bl!pyyy1any co rt thereof co petent remainingioportions ofdthinhhall not andtthee CitydCouncil tof the City of Denton* Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaininS portions despite any such invalidity. MM Iy, That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is h publishod ereby directed to cause the c 1tion of this ordinance to be newspaper of twice City h of Denton, Texas, Cwithin lton (10) days iof the dente of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1486. K CITY OF DirgTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEWTON, TEXAS BYl PAGE 5 . 901 CtTY C . IkASPORT, p:. 4 EV . TO: Mayor and McEWS of the City Council ' FROM: SUSJECT: Review Requirements for Landscape/Tree ordinance 11C, ON"I'", TIOK N/. SUMMARY: Review landscape/tree ordinances from other cities BACXGROUND: N/A PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: i N/A FISCAL IMPACT: !l /A Respectful!; submitted: b-y V Pr red b a e Br. nkman Title Director, Parks and Recreation ` Title .;Klk+r }ap.'.stcF g c:w, r,;y ,r' • aT y' Of ON NTON~ TEmit VVft OW"W / 42! t s, MbK ► / Dan"#% Tina" re"f M 6 M O R A V D U M Tor Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager PROM: Steve Brinkman, Director, Parks and Recreation DATE: February 12, 1986 8Ur,,JECTr Landscape C dinances We have summarized vai;ious landscape ordinances from other cities for your review. We will go over these at the Council workshop session on February 18, 1986, and discuss our options. Items we would like Council to consider are: 1) Percentage of open space within the development. 2) Percentage of landscaped areas within that open space. 3) Should a eras survey be required. 4) Restrictions on cutting trees. 5) Number of trees per square feet of open space. 6) Size of landscape setback along city thoroughfares. teve Brinkman MEM00505 ~~/.ealatil asd rs~re~ ' ' • ~Yarl~•o~tal ~olal • ~ OMnbn PW" and Reereall" / Don#W% TUOM I (Of 71 806M TO k, SMAKRY OF LANDSCAPE 0RDINANCF.8 City of Dallas Landscape Regulations Effective March 1. 1986 Landscaping regulations apply to all zoning districts with the exception of identified special. districts, sing U family zones, and duplex zones. Landscape plans are awarded points for inclusion of specified elements. K minimum number of points must be accumulated for site plan approval. The point requirements vary by zoning district and adjacency to residential lots. Lots located adjacent to residential property are required to provide a greater amount of landscaping. Landscaping Requirements 1. Buffering: Buffering is required between residential and non-residential lots and must be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width and six (6) loot in height and must extend the length of the lot. All other buffering must be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet in width. 2. Screenings Offstreet loading spaces must be screened from public streets and residential districts. Screening must be at least six (6) feet in height. Parking surface screening must be at least three (3) feet in height. 3. Parking Area Landscapings A minimum of 25 square feet of landscaping for each required offstreet parking space and one large tree for each 10 required offstreet spaces shall be provided. All spaces must be located within 80 feet of a t&ee. 4. Oeneral Requirementss All landscaped areas must be irrigated and protected from vehicular traffic by appropriate barriers. 5. Credits are available fors a) existing trees which are retained, credit is based on tree size. b) the provision of permiable pedestrian walkways. c) the inclusion of trees along public streets located within 30 feet of the curb spaced a maximum of 50 feet apart and covering a minimum of '151 of the total street frontage. Maintenances Landscaping must be maintained in a healthy, growing condition by the property owner. Main h, . Town of Addison Site Landscapins Effective August 41 1982 Landscaping is required in all retail, commercial, and industrial districts. The requirements vary according to zoning district. 1. Landscaped open space requirements by zoning districts: Local Retail (office) a 200 of total lot Local Retail Permitted Use a 13% of total lot commercial a 10% of total, lot Industrial s 5% of total lot 2. Landscaping is required in all parking areas that exceed 20,000 square feet as followss a at least 5% shall be landscaped b) a tree of 15 feet in height or 3 inches in diameter is required for each 2,000 !mare feet of parking area c) credits are given for larxdscaping along public streets 3. A landscaped buffer of at least 20 feet in width is required along all public streets. 4, All landscaped areas must be irrigated, city of Plano Landscaping Pegulations Effective March, 1986 r. Landscaping requirements apply to all non-residential developments. Requirements! 1. Landscaping is required on 5% of the total urea. 50% of the landscaped area must be provided in the street yard of the property. 2. Tree requirements: Vowly planted trees are required to be a minimum of 7 feet in height and 3 inches in diameter. The ordinance does not specify a minimum number or required location of trees. City of Austin Landscaping Reguicnen, t* Eff*ctive July, 1962 Landscaping requirements apply to all lots in''the City of Austin. 1. Landscaped open space requirements for street yards: a) 200 of street yard b) one tree at least 6 feet in initial height, either existing or replaced, in the street yard Additional tree requirementss -street yards of less than, 10400 sq.ft., one tree per 1,000 sq.ft. -street yards of 10,000-110,000 sq.ft., one tree per 2,500 sq.ft, plus 10 trees per area over 10,000 sq.ft. -street yards over 110,000 sq.ft., one tree per 5,000 sq.ft. plus 50 trees for more than 110,000 sq.ft. *Street yard is the area of the lot between the front wall line of the building and the public street right of way line. 2. Landscaped open space requirements for parking areas and vehicular use areas. a) 90 sq.ft, for each 12 narking spaces in the street yard b) 60 sq.ft. for each 12 parking spaces in non street yard areas c) no parking space shall be located more than 50 ft. fro: a landscaped area and landscaped areas shall be evenly distributed throughout the parking area All landscaped areas must be protected from vehicular traffic, irrigated, and must not obstruct the view of motorists. *Special consideration shall be given to the preservation of large oak, elm, and pecan trees. *Other credits are also considered for landscaping that is beyond the minimum requirements. CiU of Austin Tree Ord~in:nce Effective May# 1983 The tree ordinance provides for the protection of trees with a trunk circumference of 60 inches or core. Major provisions of the tree ordinance: 1, permission to remove a protected tree must be granted by the Austin Parks and Recreation Department (except when damaged and thereby creating a hazard to life or property). 2. All site plans must include a tree survey of protected trees and proposals for removal of any protected trees must include an evaluation and recommendation by an arborist. 3. Proposals for the removal of protected trees in city C.I.P. areas must include an evaluation and recommendation by an arborist. City of Santa Barbara, California Tree Ordinance Effective August, 1964 The ordinance provides a comprehensive plan for the planting, maintenance, and protection of trees along streets and within public areas of the city New subdivisions are required to include trees along all streets. The cost of planting and two years of maintenance remains the responsibility of the subdivider, and thereafter, responsibility is assumed by the property owner. Historical end specimen trees are protected under the ordinance. Landscape Beautification. Wilaette, Illinois Effective 1979 The landscape beautification ordinance applies to offstreet parking areas provided in all types of development with the exception of single family and duplex units. 1. Offstreet Parking Buffer Area Requirementse A three foot landscaped buffer is required around the perimeter of all offstreet parking areas. One tree per 35 linear feet shall be included in this buffer area. 2. Offstreet Parking Landscaping Requirements: Ten percent of the total parking area must be landscaped open space, and one tree is required for each 400 sq.ft, of the parking area. City of Alas, Michigan Tree Ordinance Effective June, 1980 The ordinance protects trees and shrubs in public places from damage or destruction and provides guidelines for planting trees in residential developments. In all new residential developments, one tree, at least 1-1/2 inches in diameter, is required for each lot with 75 feet of frontage or less, and two trees are required for lots in excess of 75 feet of frontage. Corner lots must provide one tree on each street. J a ,,A z city of Georgetown, Texas Landscape Ordinance (Proposed) The proposed ordinance applies to multifamily developments and offstreet parking areas. Multifamily Development Requirements One tree, at least one inch in diameter, and six shrubs are required for each dwelling unit, Offstreet Parking Area Requirementss Landscaping is required for ten percent of, the total parking area and shall include 20% trees, 30% shrubs, and 501 turf or groundcover, Landscaping may be caivided into a number of sections at the builder's discretion All areas must be irrigated and maintained by the property owner, .w. y.5 .A~'~P. .°S~. "~it~r4'~~ F°R'~1e.F v<.~,-~c't^F.(" _fiY eT i"P•. ~ e .c>.,.. L March 4, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT Consider Final Oversize Participation Payment - Parkway Plaza Phase I, Dunning Development Corporation - Bid 09433, 8" to 27" Water line RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February 209 1986, recommended to the City Council approval of $32,398 as the final cost of City's participation in the oversize water line from 8" to 2711. SUMMARY The developer had successfully installed the 27" water line along his property frontage according to City's standards and specification. The water line has now been accepted for City maintenance. This request is for the final payment for the oversize participation cost. BACKGROUND This oversize agreement and the corresponding bid opening were recommended by the Public Utilities Board and approved by the City Council. This water line is required by the City's Master Water Distribution Plan. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Denton Municipal Utilities, City Engineer, Developer and Citizens. FISCAL IMPACT Previously approved by tiie City Council Bid Opening - Bid #94330 City's Participation Amount $320398 This request for final payment to the developer $32,398 Source of Funds - Water Bonds Account 0623-008-0461-9138-7921 4186U:7 Prepared by: Resp tl ly Submitted, / Srini Sundaramoorthy o arre , Git a ager Civil Engineer APP BD, r7Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Participation Cost Tabulation II Location Map III Final Acceptance Letter IV Copy of Previously Approved P.O. V Minutes of PUB Meeting of 2/20/86 4lk86U:8 3' F: a7 BID %~33 BID OFBN Ht! Co Y ACCOUNT 1 Aff d) / 2a c ~ 7 o Goo. 3 00, ioso ~T ,eo ~7~Pa G~ Goc [F 8'' 8s /,Z ~o /o.I'i 40es, / lw 6► " 600. _#.s0 G i 0 X0000 Qp, EVA y o ~s'p 5' Qc4 8 It G i 4040, 800 coo .jo~~,/ .500. {•~'SD l /00. ~O ~i L/V. ~r~~~ e! VV~. ~O ~0 • 4919449,' 000, A01 Voooo ~ Al. S /o" 9, 40040, loeo. 4 'car~v. f t too, ;.t o o. 3 00, 3 600. Af o 00. ~Aodro / 9pip 2 400, 2 0 0 36d, 3b40 z140 2 ;F40 00 400, /O/A,.f0 Pao, 2000, zeoo (,0'09 95~/9~ /4040,/o.~ co Ir rARt~~tRA 40sr wu I 1 I I ► , r 1 1 • l 1 i.- / err ► 1 • i ► ` L ~ I i r ► ~ I 1 w r i r-- tNwR T CITY OF OENTON,TCXAs ALf MAT[ NO 3 cowuttR oaxMo. .w..+~►►,r "Da" a AA~Ow. w • ...r..rnw. r1• ~ w f p. i a ^a ~34p "',aS "7st+;'° 4 e4s~ r v rr ::Rini a M Dom% 70M MI NICiPAL O MLDINQ l 216 E, McK1NNEy 57. / DENTON, TMS 1~pf January 29, 1986 f` Utilityy Contractors, Incorporated 2720 Stemmons Freeway Suite 203, South Tower Dallas, Texas 75207 Dear J.T.: The water and sanitar sewer line improvements for the kwa plaza Add on ave een nspec ed and approved by "parZity~ De on ng veering personnel. Plans a -e from Wier do Associates, Incorporated dat*d October 1984. As-built drawings and a maintenance bond have been received and approved. Project valua~:$125,954.00. The improvements are hereby accepted with Cit Of maintenance beginning January 28, 1986, y Denton If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, A og r c an a Sr. Engineering Tech/Inspection Superintendent Water 6 Sewer 4'rOef~ n ece or. #0370E 877/504M D/FW MEM 43e.2M .mow.. .1 . , t ab i~;LIB..iC1~YCCi13,~t~.'df_'IWZIF7t:6.s„'lk.'-0 0. mumem DATE'V04" NO. ► OOC NAEwt TV: 6Bp13 olV~o~}i~.: CIO vadm :4p To.. RIDGCWAY PLAZA JOINT VG'NTURdS •UTiLITY AomiNISTRATION C/0 WICA L ASSOCIATES, INC. , COWIPMATi4N ONLY 3904 50UfM FRlEMAY 00'140T FOUPLICATE FONT wok Trio TX 7b330' REM ACOOUW NUMBER r. UNiT8 NUMBER.,.. DESCFOPTK)N BID NO. UNE AMOU, 01 623 008 046 V 9138 ; kdw l i 1 +r{w~.; .t 3 .PAA'TIfIPATION,.OYltS:216 09 623 OQA 0461,9130'. Life r 4 . M a- i ''32• S ' 1 i y... '.y'k .Y'/.~,44.iM•1 , '•I-.. !'.'I n .nr ~ ' •r''I .r' •I V' Thy City 0 Owton, Texas Is tax SxemPt • Hotm 8111 No. 20. TOTAL FOR P. o . 3 2 . J 9 o . i 11.11. Nuf w "Wft flow" osr Carona NfuaAw Aff*uM EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES February 20, 1986 5. CONSIDER FINAL OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION PAYMENT - PARKWAY WATbK LINE. Haar explained that the Utility Department Staff recommend approval of $32,398 as the final cost of City's participation in the oversize water line from 8" to 27". The developer had successfully installed the 27" water line along his property frontage according to City's standards and spelcification. The water line has now been accepted for City maintenance. This request is for the final payment for the oversize participation cost. This oversize agreement and the corresponding bid opening were recommended by the Public Utilities Board and approv6d by the City Council. This water line is required by the City's Master Water Distribution Plan. Ham explained the fiscal impact as follows: Previously approved by the City Council Bid Opening - Bid #9433, City's Participation Amount $320398 This request for final payment to the developer $320398 Source of Funds - Water Bonds Account #623-008-0461-9138-7921 Frady motion, Thompson second, to approve the final payment. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. i3Z.+R` •-a ts~;.n+t+~a s._ .~p.;... .tom..; .~t mi ~t T , , 41T1f M MWM% TEX" MUMOPAL MLDINO / 216 F. AkK/NNEY Sr. / DENTON, TLW 7W MEMORAHDLAI DATE; , November,8, 1985 T0; Jerry Clark, City Engineer FROM: Roger McDaniel, Senior Engineering Tech/Inspections SUBJHCTs Panhandle Drainagt Project The Panhandle Drainage Project was recently completed on September 16, 1985. Our records reflect 94 days over the 120 work days ~llottodd (214 total) for the project. The files were researched and Found that four `4) days were charged by mistake. These four (4) days should be adjusted to reflect 90 days liquidated damages to be charged; Changes based on the 1972 Texas Highway Department Specifications are 90 days x $210.00 a day . $18, 00.00. R.L. Roberts Construction was unable to document reasons enough to justify granting any further work days to this contract. A check in the amount of $840.00 should be released to Atkins Brothers Equipment Company, Incorporated to adjust the four (4) days charged in error. Original Contract Amount $7679616.57 Value of Work 783,044.19 Total Paid -764,77'.85 To be Paid 4 days x $210.00 8466000 Total Payable to Contractor 765,613.!:S Total With-holding for L. Damages 17,430.:,4 Cost Over-run $159427.62 Minus Liquidated Damages .171430 * 34 Under after Liquidated Damages .4D .11, . Roge`! McDaaie Senior Engineering Tech/Inspections is 00356E 1!T/ Q/fM1 Au'r110 4!!+4/20 ~:F 77 1 , u S , exao RECEIVING REPORT DATI KY1CNAq OMW No. PAOM/VINDpR TMIIARTMtNT , YMANACCT, N0. DILIVIRID W,.. ITiY N{NIItR OtICAI►TION IWANTITI/ MN" AMOUNT r' +I~ rl ❑ PAYMENT APPROVED r~ i PAYME AMIIDVtO ~Iwo raw rrw~M rMw, xN„ ~~~tM, ne, r .,3p4r' iiwY._!'«Wo., y{.gwe~~ '4 n , .i.. wsw- .f..}. ,.,rMep:sww`.s. ~*-twar:.~[~1sp -t r/,M a~a waT WNPALL a w MOE um 7W51 s►t.e No._ Final Psrlodto,.Account flu. #92,A P.O. N 64190 ob a 508 r:_ C~ tv °l Damon AJdrryK: 21E. Mai:lnnp► tsnton, ;tic. 762,31 ractortAtkins Bross, equiF. Co.. Inc* Address: 918 M. arshsll Graft? "n'.ris, Tx, act N:IM i (+a..ha..rl t ■ Dri ~s•~ : wnr.nv0,11 ent8 5.' - ~__._...Contract Mount: 76"bfb of Calendar (Worklnj) Days: 120 W,o. mac,, r n ~..,E---. of Contract C mplated Completed V41" DqacE$ptjft of I es s c csplsr:sd Coll ossls vslant 8Y 10702 10215 0 10213 4.9 6014,7 R e o rb d gutter LF 52? 497 Q 497 20.00 9940.4 ne rove r inlet 8a 4 6 0 6 1.00 9000.0 h• ve aono. box culvert LF 140 140 104 140 75600 1OS00. Unclassified Exuavat3.on C'l 6,470 6.470 0 6,470 8.00 51760.1 TYR! D as it patch tans 165 284 60 344 50,00 17200.E 4" Clans A conc. bottom Sy 3.720 3,385.5 291 3,677.5 42. Sp 156293. b" Clara A oono# wall 3Y 20570 2, S 99 32 2, 631 58.35 133,466. Claaa B conc.si fin` SY 10Q 100 p 103 316.66 12015.1 Metal Bean Guard ?'*no* Lip' 35 35 0 35 125.00 . 4375.00 lb" A.C.P. LF 87 132.5 C 13:.5 24.53 3223.73 24" c CV-CL Lr' 270 251 0 251 54.20 8584.20 27" R.C.P. or C.AP-CL L6' 185 180.5 0 180.5 45.28 7812.04 ved by: TOTAL AMOUNT OF ORYGIWU. CONTRACT P3r.Rp'O1MEp EXTRA WORK PERFORMED . ATTACHED STATEMENT led by: MATERIALS ON HAND - ATTACHED STATEMENT ad by: TOTAL VALUE OF WORK TO DATE fled Correct LESS: AMOUNT RETAINED x AMOUNT PAYABLE ON CONTRACT LESS: AMDUW Of PREVIOUS pAyNWS BALANCE DUE TWIS FSTIMATE 7 "x .7 WOW RPFWWVW m .tr No,~~i terlud,,_____itu ~Accoklnt c P.). # 64170 rob # 'SO(i 014 -Of Lentos ALldrer.cc 215 lc;inney Denton. 7k. 76201 aetor: Atkins Bros. .quip. Co, no. Addrose : 918 w. ~araha2l G.1u4 Prairie. Tx. cc N.~wec_-_~tiandle L'rsina~a Iapr;veeenta ~ Contract Amuntc 767,6 16.57 I C.ilendar (Working) (lays : 120 W.. ~a! r. o y _ air y o3ui'oT 19 JJIM io of It** of Contract COacpleted t•.oMplated laced Complett Dare: , jtUxiously Unit mar/ worig 30" P.os C.M.P.-C.L. V 326 407 0 407 31.02 20163.14 46" H.C.P.or C,M.P.- .L. 10 1,1.05 1,443 0 1,443 79,00 113997.00 4" Dias Manhole ec cover EA 2 2 0 2 ! .600. (?0 3200.00 6' Curb inlet fiA 7 7 0 7 24CO.00 15400.00 8' Curb inlet #A 2 2 0 2 x.550.00 5700.00 10' Curb inlet !r'A 1U 10 0 i0 3#230.00 32500.00 81 Curb inlet-e type I 9A 2 2 0 4100"600 2 _000.00 lv 'Curb inlet-apeo tp VI WA 1 1 0 1 4.400.00 4400.00 Rebuild inlet-Speo tp V1 4A 0 ,0 0 4600000 0 x Junction Box At Cover r.A 2 2 0 2 2.40u.00 4800.00 June. Box 6 cover special bA 2 2 0 2 6,600.00 13200.00 14 11 To li 350.00 3850.00 Inlet fc&Ae 6 cover HLIP267 Concrete Curb k tier 80 3 0 ~~8_~ '/.UO 5621.00 iod by:TOTAL AMOUNT OF ORrGINAL CONTRACT PZRFOR 0 EXTRA WORK PERFORMED - ATTACHED STATIMNT led by:MATERIALS ON NAND - ATTACHED STAT04ZXT :d by: TOTAL VALUE OF FORK TO DATE (led Carrect~_ LESS: AMOUNT RETAINED 2 AMOUNT PAYABLE ON CONTRACT LESS: AMOUNT or PR1:Vi0u8 PAYMENTS RALANCA DUE THIS P.STIMATE t wim raw ate 11o.~~`Porlod t°.--- Acco~~nt No. A'92'lii P.O. F 6j6190 Ab M 30b 2 1C. .4cltinne f onion. Tx. 76201 acgor: Atkins Bros. ul . 'Co wwftm~ at inc..."~,.AdJrees: 91. M. ,tirsmll Gsand Prairie. Tx. C t N.4461 ~ PanbAW le Drai a I,s rovesents ----.Contract Arownt: 767,616, 57 t..,lendar (Working) Days: 120 - ""-r W.04 Ira r, M n r Deecrl lop of item Of Contract CouPleted c Completed .,s~letod p a -u Cooplet b• Co croLe vesenL t s By 10 12 0 12 40000 460.0K " dews SY 10 27 0 27 26.00 702.00 Concrete sawout 245 MM, ft"-ft" 245 O 243 1420 294.00 x 2' conce box cu_vert LF J34 159 0 159 120000 19080.0 5yx 5' r nom box culvert a. 87 87 0 81 160.00 15660.0 6'-x S' Concrete box cul. IMF' 113 115 0 115 240.(,0 27600.cA a' X'-3' Concrete box ::ul, ly 45 45 0 45 340.00 AdJust 4" San, sewer ssrv FA 13 3 ,00, 0( 5 2 0 2 400000 800.00 Adjust water service LA 5 4 0 _ 4 400.00 1600.00 Remove, tjL%.g,.421, x 36* FA S 1 0 1 1600,00 1600.00 4' Chaln Link Fence LF 50555 1:537 39155.5 4,692.5 340 16423.75 Class A conc. (bottom) SY 10955 0 0 0 42.50 0 6" Class A conc. (wall) SY 1,220 0 0 0 58.33 0 ved by: TOTAL AMOUNT OF ORIGINAL CONTRACT PERFORMED EXTRA WORK PERFORMED - ATTACHED STATEMENT 1 ad h y s MATERIALS ON NAND - ATTACHED STATEMENT ad by: TOTAL VALUE OF woo TO DATE fled Correct LF.S5; AMOUNT RETAINED AMOUNT PAYABLE ON CONTRACT LESS: AMOUNT OF PREVIOUS PAYMTfNTS BALANCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE .,tv MO. 7trkAI . Ptrlwl,,,__ c"-of Donton encun, 'Px. Att:lne bros. .4ulp. o., Addrar:s: y; W, 'uratai.l ;;rand Frairles 'rx. ~t tt.ler: FanhaMrtla QralnaGe i,: r~vu.ienta_ "ontr.:.:t Arouunt• 'iG7,~; j.y' j* - '...r..~..~.... f C.,lefsdar (WorklnS) Days: I2u '4. 1. l:<<u n f-Irm,~*ca'v3d u.4Ti Dan 'TE.Ii" aTe`:~7 of Contract Complttrd (,oaplacod plated CoopI Ifteerl tlon of Item l10a6; ►i1int (t„y Yrtlviouxlvv, TI s Mu, NItt UnIt ?rice Work- 21,04, E: acast_ Co Ctsr:t 1 f t K l+~i , U!, r i I TOTAL A.M(ilNT OF ORIGINAL' CONTA"ACT PERF'Okn ?811158.Q7r, +/Wed by 2 fe EXTRA WO RA PF:Rr+)R,Mb.I) - A C."ACHLD STATWENT !vd by:0,%TEk1ALS ON IiA X - ATT,%+ Alej STATN4ENT ed by, 'AlTAL VALUE of WORK TO UATE fled f.orrect I.I:SS; jV.I()UtPf RETAItrED.~ AMOUNT PAYABLE ON C.0N•rRA!:'r 7e.3yQ44_aj9 -VS'Lf.M A.sIt)ONT OF PKINt ll'S PAY4ENTS PAI.W4CE DUE 11115 F:;TVIM ? (LeR#: Polti 19 740.o 94 oars aro 816034.08 Atk,ne brothers aqulpwmt Co., Irc. 918 W. Mars"ll Csand 1'ralris, Texas 75051 t47.aw :iwate lwo. Foul Period _r.oAccount No. 9298 P.O. Box 64190 tern City of Denton Address 215 E. McKinney itraetors ATkins Bros. Equip. Co. Inc. Addressi 916 W Marshall, Grand Prairie TX ),ject N"91 Panhandle Drainage Imprvoments 767,616.57 Contract Amount Jnlt Approved uantity quantity uantity !slue o Dusuription of Item of Contract ompleted Completed ospleted osrlst .WAL. 4uantlt revioual This Moo o Cate Unit Trio erk EXTRA WORK 4-90' bend 107.17 428.1 @-retaining glands 20.09 40.1 25' C-900 3.85 96.2 4.5 CY concrete 44.00 198A 22 hours labor 8.50 t81.d 10 hours backhos 35.00 350.0 plus 10% 130.C Total Extra Work 1886.1 1 10' Gate 118.00 118.1, Extra Gates 338.( Total A,aount Of Original Contract Performed ;.proved by s • Extra Work Perform&d - A ttachud Statement Xaterials on Hand- Attached Statement 't'otal Value T W-)rk To Date _ Lo3u: Amount ;etainsd Aawunt Payable On Contract Losss Amount Of Previous Payments+,_, ualance Due This liatisate i,a ~v P 11 e i R ei.. R. _tF~ nRC 2 '2.VP. _ h. F ',-Dept .II". *quest r ew cad approved by Dept. Dir.: • Sasturs 1. hfamation and 1081 vac_ t~s o All requests will be pprocessed in the order rsceived unless priority Ls ap roved by the City Manajer's Office. Priority Approvals-Sys o If the request requires a real property description, attach a corrsat TYPCWITTia description as a marked exhibit (9* 41 Exhibit "A") and i prepared on word processor include the docueeat ideatifiaatioa nuebec. t o It the request is for an eaes~dssento repeal or concerns a the Code of Ordinances, Cite the applicable ssatioa(s) of the Cods** of o It the r usat is for reviews interpretation *is or aeendeent to a aoatracts lease or other document(s), attach herete. Z• LUIS -A4 t tog R dad Inc Ode Or 49h A 11gessasy inforaat~io*a;s Ci +a - -cc~ 11.~11~.~ ~rrasaaasaaaaaaaw~aisaaraaaaasaaaaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaweassaasasSooamassessaaaaar or Lesal Denartmont Use only sate Received: - AssiRaed To: Debra Joe - ►ue Date: AssiRnaent Date: IA.iA• Out Date: ,*quest caaaot be processed because: '.owed Ay: Date: RECEIVED FES ~ ~ ~.q Y~*~~' z S ; f . , „PZ.~..w.-•,N..r•,~ - ts- ~s~e...Awi.~+,.QY~w~ C/TV Of DAVTW UZAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 216 E. MCkINNEY Sr. l DENTON, TEXAS ?W1 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 10, 1986 'r0: Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager FROA: Roger McDaniel, Senior Engineering Tech/Inspection and Jerry Clark, City Engineer SUBJECT: Panhandle Drainage Project In researching the files of both Panhandle Drainage and Panhandle Utilities, our findings are as follows: A. Paragraph N1 is accurate in reflecting the utility contractor was in the channel from the "no name street" to Fulton street. A section of 130' was available from the main channel to "no name street" that could have been accessed from the north. The contractor was working in the streets on the west and of the project laying storm sewers and building inlets, etc. Our records reflect at least S to 10 men were working on the project from August 60 1984 to September 6, 1s849 Giving the contractor complete benefit of doubt, we could say he was only So% efficient since he only laid storm sewer and ignored the 130' section of channel available to him with only 80' of forms on the job throughout the project duration, set up and pouring would have taken four days, five more likely. This means the contractor probably lost five days actual, lenient grant could be ten days based on a SUt efficient operation, B. Paragraph Z: As per daily reports, excavation had already occurred by Septeaber 13, since forms were being sst on September 14, for the channels east end. From September 10, to September 13, storm sewers were being installed on the west and. September 14, was not charged by the City due to a water break. Based on information from paragraph one, the SO% efficiency formula, and one day not being charged, a maximum of two days should be granted. •f?/SO W DlfW METRO 0 l c f r r, S', T .17r:9,. .:.'S r.. .rt";...- ra. °"h°TZ , "ems'. 4°,I- page 2 of 3 pages C. Paragraph w3: Assuming the dates involved are September 18, 19`4 to September 27, 1984, the following concepts should be considered. As per the dally reports, the utility contractor was out of this area by September 18, 1984 since we have a speed memo to the utility department asking that, meters be set. The contractor was pouring or setting forms on the channel on September 180 190 Z09 and September 25. They were laying storm sewer on September 21, 240 260 17, and September 28. Not only is the information (dates, types of work) submitted by the contractor incorrect but our records show he was pouring channel and laying storm sewer. His efficiency in those tasks is his responsibility not a City task. D. Paragraph 04: Regarding the statement, "The utility contractor had to la;- and test both water and serer to Pul,ton street before excavating west of "no name street", on September 18, 1984 J.W. Goin (City Inspector) sent our Water and Sewer Department a speed memo to set water meters from "no name street" to Fulton street. This meaning that all testing was complete and the contractor could start excavating, The meters were set and complete by October 10 1984* our records reflect the drainage contractor started excavating box culvert at Fulton street on November 6, 1984. Since the channel was available to excavate on October It 1984, the contractor could not have lost 21 days from October 4, 1984 to November 12, 1984 waiting to excavate. E. Paragraph 8S: The contractor was pouring box culvert on November 20, and November 21. From November 14, 1964 to November 27, 1984 no work days w+►re charged because of inclement weather and Thanksgiving Holiday. November 17, 1984 to November 30, 1984 the crew was working on the box culvert. At this time, the contractor could have excavated Ponder street and Fulton street boxes at the same time. Based on the aoove lnforr-Ntion, there is no way six days could have been lost waiting on the utility contractor. Also work on the two box culverts were available but not started. P. Paragraph N6: From December 10, 1984 to January 8, 1985 there was 14 work days that were not workable and not charged to this project. The contractor worked 10 days with full crews and was only charged for five so his comments of losing seven days isn't based on anything. In January 1985, Roger talked with R.L. Roberts and reflected to him, by speed memo, there was a lot of asphalt patch to be layed over the trench lines that were getting beat out and rough. He could have been working on this unrelated item before so it wouldn't all fall at the end of the job costing days he needed desperately. We feel like the 3 ty of Denton was conservative about charging work days to this contract. Although the utility contractor was in the channel, the drainage contractor could have been busy working on other items page 3 of 3 pages to be performed on this project during slower periods when he couldn't reach full efficiency, There were several days the crews did little or no work on the project, items 3u-.h as fence, building, clean-up, backfilling and etc could ;sad been performed when supposed channel delays started, In conclusion, the information submitted by the contractor this time isn't based on fact, Uur daily reports show most of the dates referenced are not correct or are conflicting with days they actually worked. Since the contractor has a copy of all our reports and information, this should not have been a problem. The contractor doesn't reflect in his correspondence that he was able to lay storm sewer during most of his down time at the beginning. To be lenient with him (if 501 efficiency is assumed) a maximum of 12 extra days could be granted. Since only two crews were ever on the job and the storm seirers were handled by the excavating crews, it seems like a poor argument to say they were losing days. This contractor had many other jobs in Denton and elsewhere that he was working on, Since those crews were either busy on those pprojects (Cooper Crossing, Airport, Morse Street Church, Robertson.Prairie, etc), it seems like the contractor was over extended. Penalty days were also charged on the Airport project reflecting similiar time management on that project, Every person from the Engineering Division who was on the project witnessed poor work habits by the workers. Materiais and farms necessary to keep the project going also seemed to be a problow. Eighty feet of forms were the maximum ever on the project. From January 1985, to March 1985, little or no work was done by the contractor except for minor repair work. A lot of days were rain days but those weren't charged. Other work previously referenced (cleanup, fencing, etc) were not vigorously pursued, The contractor did not keep records to justify any time delays. All his requests for extention are based on our daily reports and correspondence, It is our recommendation the ninety days penalty be maintained due to all the justification provided in this memo, If negotiations require some leeway, a maximum of twelve days should be granted as an extention. Since the contractor has proven that he doesn't have records to substantiate his claims in any of his correspondence, the project should be closed out and taken to City Council for final payment and project finalization, Senior Engineering Tech/Inspection City Enginetr is 003698 1 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Jerry Clark, Cir:y Engineer FROM: Robert B. Hunter, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Panhandle Drainage Project DATE: February 21, 1986 1 At your request, we have reviewed your response to the letter from Ricky Lemons on behalf of R. L. Roberts Construction in regard to the penalty days charged by the City for failure to complete the above-referenced project in a timely manner in accordance with the terms of the contract. We are of the opinion your reasons for refusing any extension on the contract are legally sufficient. Our opinion is based upon Cite following facts you have provided: 1. The City's daily records show the contractor was, in fact, working on the project many of the days he alleges he was unable to work for various reasons beyond his control. The contractor has no records which conflict with those of the City. 2. The contractor's contention that he had to wait for the utility contractor to finish in the channel before he could proceed is without merit because there were other areas of the project on which he could have been working at that time. 3. The contractor was working on other projects under other contracts during this time and failed to furnish sufficient manpower and forms to complete the Panhandle Drainage Project in a timely and efficient manner. 4. During the course of the project, the contractor was advised by the City of work which needed correcting and other items such as fencing, clean-up and backfilling which the contractor could have been performing but elected to leave until the end of the project, contributing to the delay. 5. The City did not charge penalty days for weekends nor for days of inclement weather when the contractor could not work. Jerry Clark February 21, 1986 Page Two We recommend that you give final notice to cho contractor of your decision, informing him that, in the absence of any documentation or proof to the contrary, ~rou have no alternative but to assess the full penalty. When you have v-.ur letter prepared, we will review it for potential legal prabtems prior to its mailing. Should you require anything further at this time, please advise. FAT 5 dSHs,~s xco Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager APPROVED: DEBRA W. AT1 ii Lt ATOM! Anms BRos. EQvipmLvT Co., INC, 911 W. MAMMALL • 6041M GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 76061 E REPLY TO FIELD OFFICE January 21, 1986 Jerry Clark City Engineering Dept. City of Denton Refs, Penalty days for panhandle Drainage Job Jerry: I have reviewed the situation again and tried to clarify„ the information you needed. I will greatly appreciate your consideration as you review this matter. We were charged twenty one days (8-6-84 to 9-6-84) at the becinning of the job which we were unable to work in the channel. These days were lost due to the, Utility Contractor working ahead of us. His utilities had to go in front of use He started at the intersection of Panhandle Street and the No Name Street. The utilities went down that street to the channel and then towards the west. As he went up the channel he had to bring in his pipe and sand benind him, thus making this a slow process. After he got started up the channel we removed the concrete channel lining below the No Name Street, At that point we lost four more days (9-10-84 to 9-14-84) while waiting for him to get to Amarillo Street. We had to stay one block behind at all times to allow him to bring in his pipe and sand as he went. He also had to do his testing before we could pfoceede At the point in time when he got to Amarillo we could begin excavating from 0+00 to a point between the No Name Street and Amarillo. Then ve lost five more days (9-28-84 to 9-27-84) while waiting for him to get out of Amarillo. He not only LW. AMIAS 1.i ATMIS ATKINS HRUS. EQUIPMENT CO., INC. PIS W. 1AAM U , 4474M BRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 75051 MKY TO MEIO OFF" had to get to Amarillo but had to tie in his services and do his testing, When he started above Amarillo we excavated up to Amarillo Street, At this point in time we lost twenty one flays (10-4-84 to 11-12-84} while waiting for the Utility Contractor to lay up to Fulton, He had to gat his tie-ins made and get "ts tests to pass. There again was the same situation as before, we could not come up any further than Amarillo because he would not have a way to get his pipe and raterials in. After he completed this block and the City put in their meters we excavated up to Fulton and excavated the box Culver# _n Fulton Street, During this time we were able to work on the Fulton box but, were not able to proceeds with the excavating from Fulton to the West, causing us to loose six days (11-20-84 to 11-30-84), The Utility Contractor had laid his line but we waited while he tested and the City put in their now meters. Then we excavated from Fulton to Ponder, 101hg17 we finished the excavation up to Ponder Street we lost seven Gays (12-10-84 to 1-8-85) because the Utility Contractor had problems getting his test to pass and then the City had to install their meters. Then when we started the excavation on this block we were in the worst part of winter and came in to the rainy season= spring. We worked on this block for months. We were charged eighty two days while excavating this one 900' block. Even though we weren't charged the days it rained or the days after, we still had to work and rework areas of the channel many times, I realize that weather is a factor you take into consideration when you bid a job, but had we not lost the sixty four days previously explained we would not have been in near as bad of the shape we wera in, R'W. A14NN} ~ J.i. ATKIN! ATK1Ns BROS, EQUIPMENT Co., INC. ti I W. MAUMAU • 647M" GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 75M1 4) REPLY TO PIED OFFICE Therefore, I am not requesting the full ninety four day extension. I am only requesting the sixty four days ex. plained here, I will greatly appreciate your help in this matter. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (817) 458-3157, Thank ou, C ' ons Ricky 71~ R,L, rt s Const, RL/DL cc Roger McDaniel March 4, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 'COs MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROMI Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT Consider Final Payment For City's Oversize Hater line Participation To Tony Raposa - Greenway Plaza - 8" to 12" Water line, In The Amount Of $110914,50 - Bid +9531. RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February 200 1986, recommended to the Council approval of the final payment in the amount of $11,914.50 to Tony Raposa for the above-mentioned oversize City participation. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND The oversize agreement was approved by the City Council February 19, 1985. Subsequently, the Bid #9531 opening was also approved by the City Council in the amount of $11,914.5U. The developer had successfully installed the 12" water line, and the City has accepted it as being complete. This request is for the approval of the final payment to the developer for City's participation. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDS Denton Municipal Utilities, City of Denton, Developer and Citizens. FISCAL IMPACT Actual construction cost difference $120041,22 (12" vs 8" WL) Exhibit II Previously approved cost difference $110914,50 (per bid opening) Final Payment Due (this request) $11,914.50 Source of funds - Water Bonds Account No. 623-008-0461-9138 *Note: It may be noted that the actual cost difference based on actual quantities installed is more than the cost difference bared on bid opening. However, this request is only for the payment of previously approved coat difference of $119914.50, 4186U0 Prepared byt 410ya ally Submait ted, Srini Sundaranoorthy rre , City anager Civil Engineer APP OV Dt -p. R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Location Map II Actual Cost Difference III M.Inutes of PUB Meeting, October 16, 1985 IV Acceptance Letter V !Minutes PUB Meeting of 2/20/86 4186Ut8 t ► * e w ~ ~ r • • ► e ~ e • ~ e r v ~ ~RFE,~Iw,~Y w Mr Ck W, . • ~ ~ ~ ~ Iun r p L, Ft~~ • AcrURL. VVLRSI LE W -L PFIRr: LPAriou cosr FRIG" PLR All) 0'1531 C DICXA;kAW taUML) LDWL31 wbo1A) [3UAA+r1f7f:Z ; iFS Vtmlelm My G17Y' 1A14pre ui tzpr"l 1 DID 4 i DID Oll&M ACCO!!i1'1' t -qR UNIT rot. TOM DI For"" ~w 1t" ►VC ML 1908•9 LF •A 21.36 i +qt?iPA-04 ~ XASS020 V PVG W L 1 sdr.6 LF M 13•SV N *ZlW - fI" D•f•P 104 Lit i 17.00 i Oil, 1!'' L?•hP /p4 L~' N fi•OB It bDL4 i 10 " MAE 1046- LF• 6i• It 1 t, t1#3•yal 14" WEE 84'1.x_ !!t0•DD A E.S10.0 20 JMXL. CAVAt6 idle L6: 116'•00 R 612 00 l~ M a /S OD t 1,960.00 F1TrlN65 FIR 12" WL L••5 6ssb•eo Sac:. F/771N8S I~fL e" W4 L.• S 343F ~o ~ Ii,Ow1.11 •i EXCERPT FROM MINUTE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING October 16, 1985 I.." 7. CONSIDER bID OPENING HID 19531 GREENWAY PLAZA WATERLINE OVERSIZE 0 RAP U k Nelson pointed out that the City Council has already previously acted on this item by their approval of the oversize agreement. Boyd made a motion to approve the lowest difference of $11,786 from B 4 F Construction as the City{s share in the Greenway Plazas waterline oversize participation. Second by Thompson. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. ► ► . r r r r . ► r ► r r ► ► . r • 01 DLMTOMe TOE" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY ST, / oENTON, TEXAS ?M December 13, 198S B A F Construction S03 Scorlett Oak Allen, 'texas 7SO02 Dear Oliver: The 12" water line improvements for the off-site Greenwa Plata Addition ave been inspected and approve~"bycity of. Denton Engineering personnel. Plans are from Burke Bng~neerfnQ Company dated July 3, 198S As-built drawings and a maintenance bond have been received and approved. Project value: $51,199,00 The improvements are hereby accepted with City cf Denton maintenance beginning December 11, 19960 If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, M f Rogeff__~Icaniel ro 4nn~ Senior Engineering Tech/Inspection Superintendent Water 8 Sewer ec. nspector sr 80333E i 81715064M D/FW METRO 434.2M r 1 EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES February 20, 1986 4. CONSIDER FINAL PAYMENT FOR CITY'S OVERSIZE WATER LINE iTEENWAY'Y'AZ7C~- -f-oo =r WATER EINE IN } AMOUNT OF 1, l4. '0. Ham explained that the Staff recommends approval of the final payment in the amount of $11,914.50 to Tony Raposa for the above-mentioned oversize City participation. The oversize agreement was approved by the City Council February 19, 1985. Subsequently, the Bid #9531 opening was also approved by the City Council in the amount of $11,914.50. The developer had successfully installed the 12" water line, and the City has accepted it as being complete. This request is for the approval of the final payment to the developer for City's participation. The Fiscal Impact is as follows; Actual construction cost difference $120041.22 (12" vs 8" WL) Exhibit II Previously approved cost difference $11,914.SO (per bid opening) Final Payment Due (this request) $110914.50 Source of funds - Water Bonds Account No. 623-008-0461-9138 OkNote: It may be noted that the actual cost difference based on actual quantities installed is more than the cost difference based on bid opening. However, this request is only for the payment of previously approved cost difference of $11,914.50. Boyd motion, Frady second, to approve the final payment. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. A t r ~ Y CITY of OENTMe 79XAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, MCKINNEY ST. ! DENTON. TEXAS M01 M E M 0 R A M D U M DATE: February 6, 1986 TO: Rick Svehls, Acting City Manager F1WMt Rojer McDaniel, Senior Engineering Technician/Inapection SUBJECTi Woodrow-Spencer Tie In We have received the final estimate for Woodrow-•Spencer Tie-In, The estimate is correct for quantities and payment. The contractor is Jagoe-Public Construction Company. This project was started in April 198S but was stopped in the early stages in May 1985 so we could acquire electrical easements to move power poles from the new roadway. A change order was submitted and approved to deduct lime from the low P.T. subgrade and add two inches of asphalt base and to add a driveway at the Seven-Up Bottling Company. This increased the original contract price of $86,412.19 to $93,135.65. We completed the project at a cost of $92,580.15. This was a cost savings of $595.50 or .60% under adjusted contract amount. The project was completed using twenty-five days from the thirty days allotted. Please advise if further information is needed. Roge@ McDaniel Senior Fagiaeering Technician/Inspection to 1 817/604=0 0/FW METRO 434-2620 r° MOMMY ESTIMATE :ype of Work Cob-,% Y ~♦1~ Estimate No. ~ r I~AL 'ro ject Nava ° r70&--j(1 - 1Y.Q gOWZk;Tn„ Contract Awarded From: To Contract Amount 11M.6r -stimated Period From:.. ~=,1,__,19 to ' Z 7 19 " Calendar Days :ontractor - ' Allotted ---A Q~ Used EM DESCRIPTION IT P11 E AMO w r of .2.66 f 4. I r• • r1 P 1/ II 11 , V le • O G• r1 r h • ROM- f . u O . / 02 -4 & -1jo- ail U, E49= ~J • „ fs 11A~L 79 00 lr~ 11 Its In • g i ~r tided Total Amount $ . q2-A'R D.1 S"' Correct $ Plus Extra Work ,tQ~,,, 17 -r 9 Total Amount of Lork Dore $ O . +prov/ Less E Retained $ ,teL: n Less Previous Pfa<ynants $ kd. f j Amount Due This Estimate 046000 $ yv% C/Tyo/"MT004 TUX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON* TEXAS 76201 TELEPHWC 18171 Sdd4= MEMORANDUM 11 DATE; October 18, 1985 T0: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent PROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer SUBJECTt Change Order Did 09410/$pencer-Woodrow Tie in Please present to the City Council our request for a change order for the above project. Two areas need to be addresseds 1. Since the PI of the soil was less than 120 lime stabilisation isn't effective. To insure a good solid I area At on a road that ill have very heavy traffic loads need~ately, we would I o to add extra asphalt base to the project. We feel this will insure the future stability of the road by providing a aveNent more resistant to the heavy truck loads. Enclosed is a letter from Jagoe Public showin the adjusted contract amount. Additional cost is $5,32 which s a 6.11 increase in the project total. 2. A driveway ■ay have to be funded by the City of Denton for the 7-Up plant on the west side of Woodrow Lane. Total additional cost for the drive will be X1,403.45 for 46.5 square yards. The new contract total will be '93,135.65 Pleas advise if further information is needed. Jerry Clar ' City Engineer sr 003448 JAGOR -PUBLIC COMPANY GENERAL OFFICES r. 0.wxW DENTON. TKXA8 16201 October 15, 1985 Mr. Jerry Clark, City Engineer City of Denton Municipal Bldg. Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Terry, in regard to our conversation pertaining to the cost of adding two inches of type (i HMAC to the Spencer-Woodrow Tie-In, bid ,/9410, we calculstp the cost to the City as foilowni Present contract amount $ 869412.20 Less Lime 6 Preparation (8,738.75) foil P.I, below 12 Add two inches of Ty "G" WAC lase d $30. per ton or 4,075 S.Y. 9 $3.45 per B.Y. 14j058,75 New Contract Amount $ 91,73 .20 The Trivera Cloth will cost about $2.00 per S.Y.9 but will not give you the extra strength that the two inches of hot mix will give you. O rely o s, 14 I t25;r A12 V.-Pres.-Finance March 4; 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd }carrell, City Manager SUBJECT Consider Final Payment to Dickerson Construction Co., In The Amount Of $24,249.53 For FY 85 Section A CIP Waterlines-Bid 09470: Locust Street, Bandera St WL, Georgetown Water Line. RECOAMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February 11, 1986, recommended to the City Council approval of the final payment of $24,249.S3 to Dickerson Construction Co., Celina, Texas. SUMMARY The Section A CIP Improvements consists of the following: 1. 1-35 Service Rd. new 1211 water line from University to Bandera St. 2. Replace Locust St. 4" water line with 10" water line - east to Maple. 3. Re lace Georgetown 61, water line with 811 water line - Amhurst to Bowling Green. The Contractor had satisfactorily completed the project and the City had inspected and accepted the project. This request is for the approval of the final payment. BACKGROUND The bid opening for these approved FY 8S CIP Projects were recommended by the Public Utilities Board and awarded by the City Council to the lowest bidder, Dickerson Construction Co., in the total amount of $200,727.50. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED City of Denton Municipal Utilites, City Engineer, Contractor and the Customers 4186U:O1 5 s FISCAL IMPACT Awd Bid Act Constr Previous Final Pyl Ant. Cost Paymt Due 1-35 Service Rd. 12" wl $461561,00 490943.90 409562,01 9,381,85 Rep Locust St. wl 1011 32,252.50 309899.10 27,809.19 30980.9; Rep Georgetown wl 811 121 914.00 ~117,0,777.30 1050999.57 11 777.73 $200'727:36 196,OZU.W 1749370;77 Final payment due (this request) $24,249.S3 Source of Fund: Water Bond Funds 623-008-0461-9114 623-008-0461-9138 It may be noted that actual construction cost is $2,107.20 les than total awarded bid amount. Resp ully Submitted, Prepared by: Srini Sundaramoorthy Maya Flar , a g Civil Engineer APPRO o Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Location Map II Final Estimate III Acceptance Letter IV Minutes PUB Meeting of 2/11/86 4186U:2 a r . , .w . • rl . Raw i own% do► s ; r 1 ( ~ atr i~s.r 1 .0. •x.11 't s. • r SC 226. tog! °7t lo. ~~~~Z~l.... ••'`..~e~.4!~!~s=~Cx'.-i. 177 ~ ~ S 'LT,? t,.:2 .1Y.~'~IL .~i LAC CIVAW Y 1' • ~ J y •JN J/V .r. r.. s f r raw q AMP" -~••...,...~..rr~ 1. JPRW U=T" r"R r mss r , } IA-M b f . 4 y ~r DIMP,SCC COXMCTIOM CONP;unt INC. F. pays Allowed 8. Box 131 used . Celina (2 Texas 75009 Days en sin ng ~21~) 382-2123 pays R - P3RIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR-PARTIAL FAYMD? Periodical Estiwats No Final Period..,- _ Name oit Om r Cit of Denton Address- QPnrnn--Tgxas 1983U ity CIP Sec. 8andera X4 Type of Projaotr id #9470 P_n_ aoAwn gatimated Contract Cost $ 298sj!,M item / Description Unit Quan. Cogdsted Unit Total to Date Price Aunt. W-1 6" PVC waterline l.f. 50 12 20. 240.00 W-2 8" PVC waterline l.f. 3120 -0- 20.4 0.00 W-3' 10" PVC waterlini l.f. . 631 -0- 22. 0.00 W-4 12" PVC waterline l.f. 561 601 25. 15025.00 f W-5 12" ductile iron l.f. 160 185 25. 4625.00 W-6 6" valve 4 box each 5 -0- 500. 0.00 W-7 8" valve A box each 6 -0- 650. 0.00 W-8 12" valve 6 box each 1 1 950. 950.00 W-9 6" fire hydrant each 3 -0- 850. 0.00 W-10 8" fire hydrant eac~~ 1 -0- 1000. 0.00 W-11 3/4" water service each 72 -0- 200. 0.00 W-12 1" water service each 5 -0- 400. 0.00 W-13 if" water service each 15 -0- 500. 0.00 W-14 conn. serv, to exist. meter each 92 -0- 150. 0.00 W-15 24" pore & casing l.f. 150 150 100. 15000-,00 104-A remove concrete pavement s.y. 50 -0- 25. 0.00 104-8 remove conc. curb A gutter l.f, 20 21 10. 210.00 104-C remove walks A drives s.y. 45 29.05 10. 290.50 ' 340-8 asphalt patch (type 0) ton 400 70 80. 5600,00 364 concrete pavement 8" s,y. 30 -0- 35. 0.00 421 concrete encasement c.y. 15 7 LooO 750 525.00 522 concrete curb 6 gutter l.f. 20 21 11154 315000 . 788,40 ✓ 524-A concrete drive S.Y. 63 29.2 27. 5 SP-2 saw cut existing concrete l.f. 350 168 840.00 SP-3 concrete headwall C.Y. 1 1 275, 275,00 W-16 cast iron fittings lbs. 0 2104 2. 5260.00 Total Value of Work Performed $ 49,943,90 . Y Materials on Noted 0100 GJ Total Value of Wi rk to Date 49,943.90 Legal Amotmt Retained -0- Le891 Amount of Previous PaPents CO 560 ~1 - MAJICE DUE THIS ESTIMATS ~„S 9.381.=9 . 4, 0 P.-O. Bo : ius Celins Texas 75009 (2Z) 382-2123 PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL ?A Periodical Bstimate 70 Final Period 12-3-~ To ,7,:n A._~..~_ C!it of Denton Address nentnn Texas, Kaale Of Owner r.-.,.~.~,. ? 19 Ut lity CIP See. Locust St. M 3Z,7S~ so' Tips or Project Bid_ #94701. ,,Q,, ~25.w._.. Estimated Contract Cost $ item Description Unit Quan. Completed Unit Total to Date Price Amt. W-1 6" PVC waterline l.f. 50 -0- 20. 0.00 W-2 8" PVC waterline l.f, 3120 -0- 20.4 p. W-3 10" PVC waterline l.f'. 631 630 22. 14175. W-4 12" PVC waterline l.f. 561 -0- 25. 01 W-5 12" ductile iron l,f, 160 -N 25. 0, W-6 6" valve & box each 5 -0- 500. 0, W-7 8" valve & box each 6 1 650. 6500 W-8 12" valve & box each 1 -0- 950. 0, W-9 6" fire hydrant each 3 -0- 850. 0, W-10 8" fire hydrant each 1 1 1000. 1000, W-11 3/4" water service each 72 4 200. SDO, W-12 1" water service each 5 1 400. 400, W-13 1}" water service each 15 -0- 500. 0.00 W-14 conn. serv, to exist, meter each 92 5 150. 750.00 W-15 24" bore & casing l.f. 150 -0- 100. 0.00 104-A remove concrete pavement S.Y. 50 20.5 25. 512.50 104-8 remove conc. curb & cutter l.f. 20 8 10. 80.00 104-C remove walks & drives S.Y. 45 157.9 10. 1579.00 340-3 asphalt patch (type C) ton 400 12.5 80. 1000,00 350 concrete pavement 8" s.y, 30 20.5 35. 717,50 421 concrete, encasement c.y. 15 11.4 75. 855.00 522 concrete curb & gutter l.f, 20 11.5 ,15. 172.50 524-A concrete drive S.Y. 63 172.8 27. 4665.00 SP-2 saw cut existing concrete l.f. 350 660,9 5. 3304,50 SP-3 concrete headwall c.y. 1 -0- 275. O,OQ W-16 cast iron fittings lbs. 0 95 2 55 237.50 r Total Value of ork Performed $ 30,899.10 _ Mavorials on Nand "r'otul Value of Work to Date 300899,10 _ Lessr Amount Retained.2.. n- nn Iris: Amount of Previous Payments $ 27.809.19 94LAtirm DUS THIS ESTIMATE 3 r .7ari wr:S~► CiOxmiCTIOi1 ~aMin it P. • 0. Son 131 Celinst 'texas 75009 (2%) 382-2123 PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT Periodical Sstimats No Final Period~l2-3`-8_5 To „8; Name of Owner City of Denton Address Qgnfnn Texas 1985 Utility CIP Sec. A Georget r~~-~4~ 7y7oe of Project Bid A 9LM P _ _.a~imated Contract Coat el Item Description Unit Quan. Completed Unit Total to Date Price Amt. W-1 6" PVC waterline l.f. 50 16 20-06 320.00 W-2 8" PVC waterline I.f. 3120 3100 20.4 3395.00 W-3' 10" PVC waterline l.f. 631 -0- 22.5 0.00 W-4 12" PVC waterline 11f. 561 -0- 25. 0.00 W-5 12" ductile iron l.f. 160 -0- 25. 0.00 W-6 6" valve & box each 5 6 500. 3000.00 W-7 8" valve & box each 6 4 650. 2600.00 W-8 12" valve & box each 1 -0- 950. 0.00 W-9 61' fire hydrant each 3 3 850, 2550.00 W-10 8" fire hydrant each 1 -0- 1000. 0.00 W-11 3/4" water service each 72 72 200. 4400.00 W-12 I" water service each 5 -0- 400. 0.00 W-13 1}" water service each 15 -0- 500. 0.00 W-14 Conn. serv. to exist. meter each 92 72 150. 0800.00 W-15 24" bore & casing l.f. 150 -0= 100. 0.00 104~-A remove concrete pavemmt S.Y. 50 3+} 25.0 8;.50 104-8 remove conc. curb & gutter I.f. 20 17 10.0 .170.010 104-C remove walks & drives S.Y. 45 . -0- 10.0 0.00 340-8 aspf.alt patch (type 0) ton 400 171.81 80.0 13744.80 360 concrete pavement 8" s.y. 30 3+j 35. 122.50 421 concrete encasement c.y. 15 -0- 75. 0400 - 522 concrete curb & gutter 1. f. 20 17 15.0 255.00 524-A concrete drive say. 63 -0- 27.0 0.00 SP-2 saw cut existing concrete 1.f. 350 20 5.0 100.00 SP-3 concrete headwall c.y. 1 -0- 275. 0.00 W-16 cast Iran fittings lbs. 0 260 2.5 650.00 Total Volje of Work Performed ,$117 27311..-.•.r,.~...-- riatorials on }fend 4 K Total Value of Work to Date 117,777.30-1- Aso v b Aso s Amount Retained a j . Less: Amount of previous Payments 105,999.57 BALANCE SUS THIS ESTI'MATS $ 111777,73 k- TA 'Offy Of OMW!** TNX" MUMOPAL VALWNO / 216 F. AbKINNBY S. l OENTON. nWS F1 January 9, 1986 Dickerson Construction Company Box 181 Celina, Texas 75009 Dear Lewis: The water lie Wrovements for the CIP Section "A" utilities have been inspected an '-approved by City-OT-Doraton nt Weer n8 personnel. Plans rre from City of Denton dated April 22, 1984. As-built drawings and a maintenance bond have been received and approved. Project valuc:$200,727.50. The improvements are hereby accepted with City of Denton maintenance beginning January 8 1986. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, 4V-4..' sue. oge C an a Bill Brown Sr ineering,Tech/inspection Superintendent Mater $ Sewer ro Oct napector 103708 MAW4 pO oifw METRO 43#a o 1.1 MI EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES February 11, 1986 4. CONSIDER FINAL PAYMENT TO DICKERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. IN THE M , BI70s LOCUST ST..EFT, BANDERA ST WL, GBOROETOWN WATER MITF7 Ham explained the Utility Department Staff recommends approval of the final payment of $24,249.53 to Dickerson Construction Co., Celina, Texas. The Contractor had satisfactorily completed the project and the City had inspected and accepted the project. This request is for the approval of the final payment. The bid opening for these approved FY 85 CIP Projects were recommended by the Public Utilities Board and awarded by the City Council to the lowest bidder, Dickerson Construction Co., is Lae total auount of $200,727.50. It may be noted that actual constructior;, cost is $2,107.20 less than total awarded bid mount. Frady motion, Boyd second, to approve the final payment to Dickerson Construction Go. All ayes, no nays, motion j carried unanimously. i L, .a ~ m:..,..: 3. :r'~r.., g.'rY, x.?-s nor. ///~/•j~~ /1. CffYo/DENrON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 5668200 February 26, 1986 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician THRU: William J. Anderson, Assistant Director of Finance SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund RECOMMENDATION: Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued. SUMMARY: Chapter 31, Section 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500,00. Denton Savings & Loan, paying taxes for Mr. Joe Belew, has requested a re- rund in the amount of $3,143.28 for overpayment of Mr. Belew's City tax account number 4400-00600. BACKGROUND: Denton Savings & Loan paid the total taxes due on Mr. Belew's original 1985 tax statement in the amount of $3,245.41. The Denton County Appraisal District changed the amount of acreage, and therefore, the taxable value of this property on Supplemental Roll #2, This change lowered Mr, Belew's total taxes due to $102.13. The dif- ference between the original tax paid and the corrected amount is the refund being requested. FISCAL IMPACT: $3,143.28 to be refunded. Respectfully submitted, Victor Sc eider Tax echnician Wi liam J. A derson Assistant b-frector of Finance r, i , Stets Property Tax 604 rd Tax Refund Application 31.11 (2/82) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Nacre Collecting Tax For: City of Denton Tax Department (Ming s 213 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Address City, State Zip Code r rr►rw •rr • r r r rr rr r r r w w r r r r r r r r •r r r r r w r r 1rr r r rr r r r rr w r r w w r r Iw r r r w ♦rw r r w Ir •r ww wr r In order to apply for A tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer. IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER: Name: Denton Savings Assocaition/for Joe Belem Address: Telephone 9-P, w"U92 nonjop- Texas 7020g er additional n orrma on is needed)-o#---(8 77-3 0 IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Description of Property: A00 A A -U- p P R.R Tract 14, Acres 0.190 tax-roll show ig 00 acres ress or oc on q roper : 803 `W"" cre Account Number of Property: 4400- or ax Receipt um er: 1 INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of Tax From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund rs~ steel is Re nested Tax Payment Taxes s Paid Requested 1. City of Denton 19 88 1 19 85 s 3p245.41 S 3,143.28 Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): flr~~i~ll hill maa ~amen ed by` "I hereby Apply for the refund of the above described taxes and certify t the information I have given on this form is true and correct." -a . g gna _ , xtl e d Application or ax"ltefund •rrrrrrrrrrrwwrrwrrwr•rrrrrrrrwrrwrwwrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrwrrwrr.wrrrrrrrrr DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval disapproval gna ure o Authorized officer e Signature o res ng OfFfter[sl o Taxing- Date Unit(s) for refund applications over $500 jiJ TAX STATEMENT ;OUR TAXES ARE aIE ocTOeER mo Of D"ioo r D.sartm,a1 '@ D BECOME DELINQUENT F SIDE RUARY t•t. SEE REVERSE xa.rory,iaarrdhir FOR PENALTY AND mTER• Drnoe,, r.,a 14wi ;r EST MEP b PRR~ TRACT 14. At RES 1900000 5A335 { a03 W* SY'CAM E Mug& i I I JOE BELEM 34323 F 206 HANN DENTON TX76201 AN 21 .CITY OF DENT01,1 TAX Of PT. ,4 4f►f#L[MtNYAL ROLL 42 PRd)ERTY TAX ROLL for: O"TOO' CITY (COS) YEAR 1985 PRIkTEOs 12/)0/95 O$t39AH hAGE , OWNER NAME AND ADD.WSS "OPERTY DESCRlFlK)N EKEMPTIONS f VALVF.S WNY IAx , A 1 TYPE AMOUNI li IYPE AAW If 1434x91 (110720) P 'LOCAL IDt 9520-00500 AO031A k. HEAUHUNT# TRACT 10# ACRES !LAND CURRENT VALUES I BARUCH# SHAUL Tk 3.9S9r 3.1/4071 ,13601 PRE,;TUN 8110 SUITE 709 SITUS: 2030 w U41VERSITT DR NHg t 5080739 TOTAL TAX E %4060#49 CARROLLTU iUKEk *EST IMPR NHS S 332#021 DALLAS# Tr ISR40 ENT M ESt GOIr COS# $05 4 TAXABLE LED S 84007601 I TAB a A40#760' ~ ~ 1 1 SUPP CODE: C - CHANGE ! +RA+A PREVIUUJ VALUES R+R+} )CHANGE LANU PRICEr ADD IMPS - PER ASSESSED S 301#7951 ~Ew TOTAL Ex $ 0 TAXABLE 1 301r795~ 9 +*R+A GAIN ()1~ LOS! *RRRR i TAXABLE 1 538#965 I I ' .r.......................00..0.0... r.r.......r. ) 4108190 (116655) LOCALES Sr Mk3~ ~ ILLCREST MHP# SPACE 7 DETROITER - •-r.rr.r....~r.r.....r. LOCAL 1DI ~S VDU-00,:3f) i A+AAA CURRENT ;VALUES AAA,►R E SI MI 07 HILLCREST MHP HS* S 4t608IIMPR HS S 4,608 TOTAL TAX 10.00 ) 2500 FT wnNyri Ok ad DA* S 0 'ASSESSED 3 40608 ! DENTON# Tx 76205 ENTITIES: G01# $050 COS TOT 1 4#608fTAXABLE s 0~ I SUPP CUDEI C - CHANGE ~ +RA+A -4RElOIOU VALUES RR*+Aj ADD 81,11 - PER LM 3 5,rlgt ( SSESSED S 40608 i~y.3 tUFAL X 0 xlAXABLE S 4#608 I A*A*A GAIN OF LUSS A*+R* ! A 70 -....rw TAXABLE S -40608 r..-. ~r...N..rr-.. r Y».r _ 934323 i27b39) LOCAL ID M # 1 0..rrAhARAr u-r0 r.►...r 4400-00600 A0925A EP R PRR TRACT 40 ACRES CURRENT ~ f 9ELEw, JOE 0.1900 5/335 206 MANN SITUSt 803 N SYCAMORE LAND HS $ 6#$40 TOTAL TAX 1102»!3 DEt:TON# TX 76201 7MPR HS b 10#220 >got NPR NHS S 250 1 ENTITIESt GOlo SOS# COS ASSESSED 6 17#310 ~1AXA8LE $ 170310 SUPP G)OEt C - CHANGE If ACREAGE CHANGE - Pkk VLk R**R* 12RE11OU VALUES ****4 f ASSESSED s 540#070 , TOTAL EX $ 0f TAXABLE s $500070 •*«RA GAIN 0 LOSS RhR+h i 3 t~ TAXABLE s .532#160 w+..0rrrr.-.rr.wr r............ r ..............r.0.wrw.n..........r .r..r•w0wrr. 0000 899991 ((13211 0.00.00...001..0 0.00....00000 000.000..0 0000.0• LOCAL IDs 9ur- 667e-1~ A1473A M.E.P. 9 P.R.R,O TRACT / RR+MRR PREV(OU VALUES ♦RhR BELLAIRE 84 3H P/S 2C(1?r ACHES 13.137 420 S CARPOLL ASSESSED s 3070051 TOTAL SUITE G ENTITIESt EX s T 1 DENTON* TX 7620TAXABLE x 30~r05 SUPP CUOEt D - DELETE RRRRR GAIT? 0 LOSS +RRRh I ACCT PLATTED AS AELLAIRE HEIGHTS TAXABLE 1 -3070041 PHASE III - PER CL r « rr..6......rrr.. ~w..rr0 wr,0r,.ww..r....., rr.rr0.rw0rrr.0rr 00.00.0..-.• 0.00.0 0.0.00.00000• .rO.Y.rrrO..r .r..0r...• ..0..r 4117818 {66397 LOCAL 10) ~~QS A0055A J. HROCKO TRACT 43A ACRES ' 9LACKfuRO, h w 0.081+ 0 "0~""~~ I A*+*A CUgRERT VALUES *h,Yh• 2520 CHAPPARAL A'w~ LAND NHS 3 221.464 ►OTAL TAX I 8111.54 ~c..~ni 1.n~~ r.. _ _ s~/.. ~ .11SSESSED f y64 I 1?/ 19/89 iIENION SAVINGS ASSOCIA1117N 1'nf:E f4 fAX PAiCt1 IM ANCFS c) ACCOUNT NOR COOT AMi ACCO(INi NF1R C00f AM1 ACCOUNT NAR COOF AMT At'f MRSI Nnp com- AM1 10-067169-6 _ 51 . . 575.43 30.0016100 3~ X1'4.01 50 o07R80-4 3~ 790.03 30 &1igill 51 X114 ?7 20-007714-0 34 497.39 20-007743-e 31 367.88 20l-007746-4 31 399.34 20 (x11790 4 31 189 ql { J002'007770-9, 31 342.21 20-00781?-0 ,31 492.21 20,007879-02Q 3! 33.48 20 Or)8019 8 31 6?(1.32 - OTF S 51 84 ?fJ dOS03l 3 5! 41-P 50-0090404 31 0,02 20 IX)OW 1 4 AI 48J. ry! 20.008069.2 31 319.0!1 20.008194.0 31 349,00 20-009284-4 21 64e.92 20 Utt6302 0 3t (109, t hi 0--g6691-4 31 338.31 20:008712.4 31 378. 1 20-ppgq87e7.0 31 90.46 20 008,737 2 31 307.24 id- 0363b=4 i 44 2 66 3Zi u0bii3'i 71 5i W N 53 ii 16166 4 1 i 1~ib 3~ a~ ri~ni~sa A 37^040161-2 31 180, t3 12 040164 4 it 332.88 AUTt1 1001 nR11Ur 077 I01AI. NnR 68 tOFA1. AMi 28,419.87 20.000100.4 31 141,14 20.000110-0 31 327,89 20 000111-8 31 399.10 70 (x)404'1 8 3} 418 Aq 20.006397-2 3f 751.P4 20-005039-.6 31 427,82 10.0056732 31 41.47 20 005078 4 31 239,19 3~-0089 4-~ ,i 9-16-46 56 CH)6419q 2 5i 148.18 10=666M'-g §i X3:36 3~ bt,*361 d 5i 813 ISd 20-000399-0 31 138.95 20~00e410 0 31 119,31 20.006429-2 at !61.85 70 ()1)6418-0 31 IR9 . U11 20'006479:6 at 236,62 20.009509-4 31 205.21 20 006558 0. 31 222.48 70 (x)051;9 6 31 !11,54 50-008690°0 3i 19B.K8 56,60-460A 31 i03,37 50009'993.4 31 1l1$. 7i 70 ix)85ri4 0 5i 188 tiA 20 0061996-6 31 138.11 70 00,7590 4 31 187.12 20.008898-0 31 191.12 70 (N)Q851.6 .11 tRp 45 20-000738-0 at 4 20.008748-4 31 180.08 20.906797-2 31 402.92 20 008604.4 31 VD Fit 50 ob6e66 a 5i 1.721).02 20 00,78'10 0 5i 60R.A1 WOOlO?5-0 5i i,626,?8' ?0 of-))6o 20-007090.0 31 1,1`13.84 20 007098-4 31 329.88 20.007110-0 at 617.44 70 au11114 q 31 nqq p0 2Q-007243-6 31 544,05 20.007272.4 31 707,t7 20-007344-4 31 663.23 20 0(1419.0 31 320.91 20-•007696-1 5i 6;1.28 20 CxMO 4 50 - 258 99 50 fki i51-4 31 4,11i.4i Sri gtj7g63 7 31 9ill.gg 20-007866.2 31 339,38 20•007905 2 311 692 74 20 007933-6 31 252.10 20 0n?ng5 0 31 148 42 20-007967-0 31 413,65 201008139-6 31 986.93 20.000214.9 31 460,83 20 (x)8228 4 31 $60.40 50 006212-0 31 88.21 70 6(iA3ne . 5i 174:53 20 0665'54:0 5i M. RA 70 1~(ia2~,9 6 it 29. Jd 20.008264-4 31 36.80 20-008283 6 31 133.23 20 008295-0 31 166.07 70 1xrP•115 6 31 107.77 '10-008?17-2 at 11.2.03 20-008332•4 31 t33,18 20•_009394-0 31 128,t5 20 (rj6490 0 31 892.50 5o-06e~(37=6 31 306,25 30 00!5608-4 5i ig§.3i 20-009;162 4 5i -116 49 70 01)9709 z 3i M U1 20-000756-4 31 209.98 20 008907-0 31 197.98 20-00e405 2 31 241.88 20 008?78-4 31 718,95 20-000939-6. 31 249,76 20-008940••4 31 204.36 20.009016.4 31 18,00 30 0?011?-4 31 172.33 30-020121-4 31 60,43 ao 030;53 5 it 179.33 30-050i5~-3 5i x5.54 56 070140 4 31 146.6i 30-070158-0 31 197.03 30.020f61.2 31 t61.64 30-020198.4 31 !61.0'1 30 0201713.0 31 171,84 ?9:9? 85-2 31 138.04 30-029M-2 r' 1 235.58 ;1 •020196-4 31 1,77 30 020202 0 3} 178,33 30-029i 2 ._51. 260.67 56:65064:4 4 i 135.40 53 "6565 io-8 5i , 86 16 65014 6 3 i i 10 ~ ) 30 02022020.4 31 179.47 32.04017,; A 3 t 773 77 32 040162.0 31 970, A9 32 rr401 it1 4 it 701), 03 32.040181-2 31 403,43 AU7N 1001. GROUP 028 TOTAL NOR •101, _TOTAL_AMT 38.1680,75 J 10-8-9 4086'4 31, 156.01 0 oo~~__4~3pp2 0 31 357,51 QO 004593 T' 31 2 8.08_ 20-,00929840 3? 1?4.70 6698 4 i ;35:00 0 oo~s733 31 233.63 5'0=ooi'si351=~ 5i .oi 36 no1y929 4 5i H5. ii 20.006974.0 31 781.67 70 95 6 31 lef.7 20.000227-6 31 7,202,08 20 006296 8 31 103.46 20-"304-4 31 88.05 - 2 -Oo(cj~380-4 31 7 4,62 20'008421 2 31 4p 33= 773:1.. 3r 35;5.05 =ei3~~tb:~. ..3i _ . i,16 5b (1i>Fii 4 5i 1 3 P 20.007025.2 31 217,40 20-001033-2 31 145,79 20.00705?-2 31 8,123.46 20 001129 2 31 884 19 20-00,7216-.4 31 654.90 20-007798.4 31 271,78 20.007301-0. 31 99.88 70 0(11324 4 31 1151.3,7 17.'10: n•. y t2/19/AR OFNfON %AVjfM% ASSOCIAiTON i'Mir 17 TAX RAiCII RAI ANCFS AC WtWt Nan CODE AMi ACCOUNT NRR COOF AMT ACCOUNT NAP COOF. AM! ACCOUNT PM ('0111' AMI ff~m3b98-4 51 393. AA 36.004343=6 31 331.31 30-664573:6 31 'Pi. d9 50 &lAio 4 3i 334,x`719 20-004470.0 31 339,20 20.00•,104-4 31 455.07 20.006364-4 31 154.92 ?0 (1.19478 4 31 570.97 QQ~~5430-0 31 239,25 20^0011528-4 31 139,91 20-005554-0, 31 375.45 20 W5594.0 31 199.11 ^008607-9 31 332.94 7U 005779 A 31 368.72 10 666H i .2 31 133.78 jJ(t iNrri*5A 4 3i 3BU a9 20.005917.2 31 128 7% 20 005986.4 31 f21,80 20-001028-4 at 1,427 65 20 (x.)9 t 4 at 135.46 70- 189.2 31 113,01 20-008289,0 31 385,50 29-00¢401-2, 31 259,90 ',Av ?Q .v :4 31 26, -3 31 7 i~7. Q-4 20 fN)84A0 4 31 ?Id, 92 20 008dAS3 • 31 250, 91 » ;'0(76 X39.36 ? 31 ~9f1 (jA 20-006791-11 31 188.79 20.006889 2 3! 73.00 20-0068916.4 31 563.7 26 20:t706969j 31 t7A 04 ` ?0-007024-4 3t 130.16 20.007070.0 31 246.36 20-007261.2 3t 142,$2,l 26 007lW4D 31 183.6% 30 66759175 5i 5617.49 70 W j'IAU 4 3 i 35d. 7a 30 007361 4 3 i -35i Wa l '29 6U'/ a i i l9 I I 70.007408.0 3t 1'73,02 20-0014.11-2 31 146.77 20-007477-2 31 301. 29-!)07 11 1110 '14 2Q ~07531-6 31 254,83 20.007545-'2 3t 261,05 20-007651-2 31 2 Ot)7f~ 31 117.18 30°569$94 b 31 31~9.13 20 067631°4 31 131.99 20 007436=4 31 2i. 7 (i!ii A 0 3i I,,3 jfi 20-007705-2 31 249.20 20 007111,0 31 129,29 20.001719-8 31 257. As 001 M 4 31 219 P9 2g po1784.4 31 188.17 20.007814-0 31 205.18 20.001889-2 31 319 20 UO7~j-2 31 797. It 3b iio3l a=ii 3 i 1143: 0 i 36 669c6d A 51 34111. v 38 3c190bz i3 31 8i -6 iHi1014 a 31 Hl i i. 20-007981.2 31 93.07 20.008016.4 31 198,87 20.008022-0 31 25 20 006014 0 31 1110 011 20006138-0 31 300.92 20-006172-4 31 328.54 2Q-008191.2 31 1 7 20-009220.4 31 287.27 06 661N 9 -i7 3"i 344 93 36''66n31V6 31 Bi.A9 10:009555'6 3i 141 30 ur4jF16 6 3i 712 44 20 000351 8 31 7,490,3% 20.008361 '0 31 150.30 20-008379-0 31 68.08 20 00191 6 at 245.70 29.008405-2 31 83,81 34-00858074 31 322,45 20-008619-6 31 801,07 20 006695 6 31 200.11 70 008734 0 3 1 $ / 65 20 6088 i9 d 5i i i'3. 40 30B9i39 d 3 i X31. d? 70 rFjNP j2 2 3 i f / f . 72 20 00900%-2 31 1391 .48 30 020170 0 31 268.20 32 040141#-7 111 104 Af 17 04oir9 4 71 2nn nd 32 040171-6 :11 2613.77 32,0401118-0 it 200.29 1 AU711 1001 gROUr' 023 10TAL NRR 94 101AL AMT 37,211.09 20.000108-4 31 257.91 20 004318 31 - 247.23 20.004881 6 31 387.83 20 W%273 2 31 386.29 20.609798-4 31 45i 43 20 W~I948 4 5i 78'1.39 36 6699469 2 di i, W biz 26 ekiel6 i4 g 2 i j j(i 14 20.006664-4 31 805.79 20-006149-0 31 191.41 20°(x70962 0 31 385.90 70 tx)1107 6 31 7 AnI n6 10-001189.2 31 152.86 20.007261.6 31 138,00 20-007430-0 31 129,18 20 007134 0 31 121.93 33°509741=3 3i 7114.44 M 6iNN-ii 5i 891 4T 20 W34A?•0 31 364,d3 ?b 00181,•3 11 'jjA aI 20.007059.2 31 558.15 20 007608.4 31 11515.44 20.00709010 31 11141.27 20 007109.4 31 76 68 2g,-007721-2 3f 810,63 20.001749-0 x31 388.36 2Q-001783.1 31 3,57 20 007911.2 31 133.52 3 -.66708i=d 31 733,E+5 36 i;~ 4145 4 tai lei AN 30,-007'341 9 3i i; $I'M zii ric*60 n Ii aid 64 20.008709.2 31 93.89 20 (Y.18339'6 3t 907.83 20 006389.2 31 68.20 20 00Al ,1 2 It I 7,x7'1 71 20-008832.4 31 623.154 20-008914-0 31 175.22 20-000954-0 31 1410,84 AUTN 1001. GROUP 0?4 TOTAL N6R 39 LOYAL AMT . 77,582.47 q -000WIS-2 3t 346.74 20.003599-0 V 300.67 20-003982.3 31 196,91 20 004234.0 31 204.63 - 333= 31 341.;%3 $A 664946-6 i 7i~n. $e 3b'oa~so0b=3 31 3253,''01 30 oiid~~)a fi z i iii a1 20-005624-4 at 223.49 20-00'0034.0 31 i80 65 20.006097-2 31 153,89 20 OOAt4,) 4 ;t1 nn 00 20-006312.4 31 214.72 20.006517-2 31 374 ,.0 20-901637-1 31 X75.2 20-OC$92-4 31 211.48 30 00154114 7 3i $16.17 23 tK1AA0(f 3 31 376.113 3q 004131 3 31 9.7 7$ 556531 8 31 04171.:1,1 20 007709.4 31 140.06 20-007215 8 31 293.79 20 007417.2 31 31069.t8 20 007444 4 31 707 Sri 20.007544-4 31, 48x,71 20.007583 6 31 203.93 20.00'1696 4 31 257.59 20 (X)1741 6 111 257 an I.r' I:1,'t1b UkNIUN SAYINGS A55UCIA11UN PAGE 13 IA% HATCH UALANCE5 033 A1,1,uUt4) fN1k 1,61,1 AMI A(1(;UIMIT NUR CUUk AMI ACCUUNI NHR COUE AMI ACCOUNT NHk CURE AMT 20 1X)IIb4.4 31 (26.21 20-007800-4-31 2213.86 20.007819-6 31 228 fit) 20.007884.4 31 260.58 21) tli,/if I() O 31 1,372.62 20.007927-A 31 250.68 20 007934.0 31 275,72 2000"32,4 31 307.86 77 6 31 163.81 20 008191-6 3t 84;66 20 008218.0 31 61 98 20.00!1244.4 it 301,U l1 2U 1B62t1 4 3t 3$1 84 20 00'9314-x.31,,. Z$.rl,99 W-60x371.6 31 337:Ci Wabi 343 .1 31 7=491' 296.39 20008694 0 31 174.12 20 008702 0 31 210.34 20-008723.6 31 703-` 2c1 1M)6'1'I 1 6 J I (311.98 20; 008789'_ 31 250. 0 _ 20.006827 6 3t 206.25 20'000917-2 31 98;91, aw~~ 20 (108934 0 31 831.133 20-ooea36- 3i 61ST. 1 3S ooea3e 4 31 63T.a2 20 po9oosa=3 31 221.26 30 3U U?01014104 4 4 6 3 31 it 2 201 801 8p 30 30 020123-4 31 203.34 30 020128.4 31'~ 198.02 30 620141-2 31 ;!68.28 020144-4 31 23 .75 30-020145.2 31 89.21 30••029160.4 31 (99,72 a0 019183-8 31 iii -ii W 6M ."Z 31 Ti ;2i.., 30-b?n188-6 31 261:!19 56,6100-14 31 184:77 36 020177 2 31 226.03 30.020188-4 31 223.78 30 020194.0 31 216.11 30.070195.8 31 194.30 30 020203 6 31 213.89 30-020215-8 31 139.15 32 040114.0 31, 5.4tl 32.040118•!1 31 235.87 J231 040640121 Z 31 1113.10 32 040126 0'~ 31 ....334:66 93-04013x•4 3'1' t 21 236,57 32.640ib8-w 31 346.93 04016/ 6 31 22b.13 32 040172.4 3f 20:.48 32 040183 6 31 12116.82 AIIIII IUU1 (AHU11N Wb '10(At Nil R 83 TOTAL AMI 24,61 x111 ~'rrF au 1100104 4 J1 2b 1 22 20 tx)JJ02 0 31 328.80 2.) 004b;0 6 51 3'74 11 20 004822-u 31 307.63 211 00'1471) G 31 226.78 20 0U5548 4 31 501 81 20 OOb726 0 31 619 02 20 Wb922-0 31 361.43 20 00611i1 6 31 224.98 26 009(92-4 31 361.08 56-66621i4 31 229 28 26-i)OH386-2 31 229. 14, 2t) 0064bb-6 31 2ib Ob 20 006461-2 31 142.80 20 006708 U 31 d 347 26 26 006769 6 31 216.18 21') 61,6914 U 31 1 , 248. 66 20 00'!084. 4__ 31 278.07 2Q-007160 4 31 t , 369,, 99 20 (X)7224 4 31 192.64 20 00'1120-4 31 437.14 20 0(17379.9 31 180:18 20.007440 4 31 242.37 20 6617 72-0 it 154,23 20 00 lbbb 4 A1 216.16 20 OU16b8-0 31 126.18 20 007677 2 31 174.26 20 007680 4 31 409.21 211 f10/h94 0 31 213 47 20 01)7730-0 31 178.75 20 0077b2.0 31 233 06 20 0)7'769 2 31 172.92 _ 21) 001791 6 31 218.7$ 26.067862-0 31 269:44 26.007666.5 31 160.28 20-607827-8 31 289.18 70 (io/b2U 2 31 260.92 20 007862-4 31 288.44 20-001869-2 31 :43,77 20 001922 0 31 169.41 lJO u0/436 0 31 226 74 20 007974 0 _31 232.03 20 008021 2 31 192.39 20-008029 2 31 265.70 26 008638 6 31 22B.3A 20 &8096-A 51 231.16 56.008084.4 31 23'1.10 20 01;808s 2 31 221:44 20 0U8t11 6 31 272.89 20 008228.0 31 205.40 20-008268.4 31 216.34 20.008297.2 31 ,29.69 211 Iu,HI) to 4 311 214; 88 JO 0()8681 1 Q4 4 2 00¢71 31 1??:? 2Q 1X "730.8 31 29Qs4'~ 70 otl"148 0 3I 229.20 26 c3oWd I ~d A4 3$-op9Z0t ~ 31 ~61.61 20-009033-2 3i 327.21 30 U«0131 b 31 246.84 30 020162-0 31 161.02 30 O2O17f) 0 31 297 88 30.020197 2 31 226.64 Ji 6:.(1211 4 31 147.19 32-040104.4 I 287.71 32 34-040119-8 31 29340 32 040131.6 31 223,9.1 , 32 0401151 -6 31 232.14 32-6401B4279.86 4-3i AU1H )001 (,"OUP 026 TOTAL NOV 70 10TAL AMT 20,222.32 20 1x)3440-4 31 272.11 20°003692-9 31 272.16 26-b63978°0 31 278.99 20 004087-6 31 374.61 20 004127°8 31 411.43 20.004252.4 31 471.62 20-004370-0 31 291.62 20 W4542-0 31 294.46 gg . ;eO 20 0046 62° 4 331 1 58(1 .23 20,004845-2 . 0 ]31 43'7.39 20-004924 -4 31 412.A3 20,004907-0 31 32212 .8 3i 4111:39 33-66Th-Z 31' 361:0 X20°668786.4 31 494.3'/ 20 ()(,5U45 2 31 496.76 20 006916 4 31 531.29 20.005921-2 31 339.21 20.006015.6 31 321,37 10 O(Ow gt 2 31 b02 67 20 906067-8 31 359.82 20-008225-2 3t 564,13 20-0062b4 ,O 31 689.21 30 01)6361 2 31 '240.71 20 A06597-2 31 366:87 X6-666681-2 51 451:61 50-108664-4 31 381,84 20 Os)6b2a 2 31 376.97 20.0()8769-8 31 820.48 20-008801.2 31 370.74 20100880512 31 48 161 20 01if.3 U :11 464.71 20 007019 8 31 446.69 2 -007116 4 31 844.75 20007$30 U 31 606.84 11/19/Sh 17/19/85 nFNION SAVINGS ASSOCIATif1N rAriE 1+5 PAX RAMP RAI.AWF14P ACCOUNT NBR CODE AM! ACCnUNT W R cone AMT ACCOUNT NBR COoE ANY Arrn1M11 NSA ronr AMP 36'-'60_75W_52 3"i. _ 119 , 3b:6me M_;5,_ fl 1ro.14 5i -"36:ai as 667%103 9 5i igA zo 20.007467-0 3i 2.17.40 20.007809-1 31 108,37 20-007868-4 91 143.19 20 001695 0 31 1 71 N1e 64 z 00436 31 178,28 20-008949.2 31.. 312 ,4¢ _ -1 31 3.72 20 009133-2 3, .2'1 X809 6 f. 47.Ig 20 008Z34•~ 31 iS~.b~J 5620-04!0°00955 53 7 3 1 31 9.15 20IIM53d 0 51 I 20-008397-2 31 1 Qj 70-008915-4 31 4 ru 34 20.006722-0 at 421.20 2O 008!.!29 Z 31 r~ . ZO°000030 0 3t 4f 20-0831-6 31 1 a 20:006833-2 31 03 2a 009958.0 31 941,.08-' aq rxti4gri8-e 3i "A'fi AST ti5 (i0870i37 `0 3i 1a,.S (12ni~ii'i 3 8 49 {t, r>365ia i 11 gal ail ADYA "10W ilffafif V34 TOTAL IM' 84 TbTA1 AIR 33. Ij i . 3~ 17 Y/ 4 r~ /e)/ 0 Jr,.. . ~0-U~1331 Z 3i 339.19 20 084199-6 3i ?93.90 70°bo4e?s ~ 31 W. id 20 fx)~2Q3 3 31 36i, Ai 20 005313-2 31 11133.87 20 005390.0 31 146,73 20.005437 2 31 318.38 20 (x)5914 0 31 194 at 29-005880-4 31 71,03 20.005858.4 31 454.88 20-005947-0 31 5.73 20 W0185.2 31 193,29 ~0-b5'M-6 31 iia.7A Ri:oog344:i 31 Oi:i4 36 trob433_i 3i 3:36 3o 6,1406 a 11 4o94 ;19 20.006497-2 31 144,81 20.006518-0 31 374.08 20-006582•0 31 407.29 20 (x)aR39 8 11 704,34 20-006640-4 31 X11-92,,. 20-008718.4 31 413.22 20-000528-4 31 00,10 2V V00949 2 31 121,14 ?f~ Qp891A-4 51 223.108 s ?0 ()08)!99 6 31 i09,23 56_664§W4 31 113.3A 71) iH)(,Oci 2 ,)1 09 ii 70.007031-8 31 1715.41 20 007112.4 at 126 34 70.007138.4 3f 497,57 70 001710 0 31 r,49 on 20-007299.6 31 189.65 20.001302.0 31 135.72 20.•007327-6 31 21 f8.18 20 001334 0 31 76 19 26•.007589.3 3i 53.9i 30 6615B4-i 31 3Ai} AO 20 o(J338'7 6 31 131.24 7(i (x!!41(1 ry ;{I 197 ii 20007457-2 31 228.38 20 007479-0 31 489,90 20,007644-4 31 103.83 70 gt)'ingq 9 31 Inn R4 10-007704-4 31 114.28 20-007811-6 31 547,15 20- W7840-4 3f 145.74 20 0(1888 4 31 118.19 20.079!9.4 51 f0A.7i ?d 659fg3•A i-- - a 1AA,91 20 OOH 194 -0 31 _-U.0 70 oO'2)I 'R 3i 143 A7 20-008303.6 31 100.03 20 OOR311 6 a 130,04 20 008324.4 31 88.17 70 0119:14ri 7 31 190 lA 20-000353--2 31 139.02 20-0083'13 2 31 101.53 20.9084138-0 31 80.49 20 900561 2 31 1 U9 91 50.008780 4 3 i i42 . ?ig 2U OUR904 4 3 i 1 12.93 20 008'937 3 3 ! `97.92 76 (jbOI646 0 7 1 3r)i 07 70-009020-4 31 12q.4g 10 020117-4~ if Ittq gf in 0201 A4 4 31 1f4.IR 12 (141) 1ap 4 it Ip1~ iq AUTN f001 nRoup 010 Tn1A1 NRR RR 101AL AMI 17 749 / 20-003566-0 32 377,27 20 0042 10 '108 10 20-00§483 b 31 113,'79 30 01•2 31 331,71 20-004307-0 31 152.92 ZU 004498 4 31 - 4971_4 31 „285.89 20; bbb~004991 2 131 410.88 20-005 38.0 31 116.04 20 005410.0 31 155,32 )3-8 61 Ali-16 20.003 Ti ai 3n0651;36i ai ii5,7o 20.005589-0 31 151,24 20.009910.0 11 461.18 20-008084-4 31 106.59 70 009709 2 31 97 37 20-V:256-4 31 142.70 20.008259-8 31 193,24 20-006400.4 31 470.61 20 ^06433 2 31 288.85 36- 416"_3 3i i87.90 $0-000691 2 31 8ii,11 iO-OOb93'a-i 3i ?11.73 10 04791 8 3i 19N.~9a 20-006936-4 31 53,80 20-007002-0 31 1.4 45.39 20-007133-2 31 1'('9,87 20 00 1138 0 31 401;.96 2 7104-4 31 465.83 20-007215-6 31 200.01 20-001280_4 31 100.85 20 007424.4 31 141.51 30= $-9 31 410,0'1 „$0 0'07/3g 4 1 1`i:7e 3o=iw'377S-a 3i __Wr:"9i ao o3l~ee o al isi gg 20-007635-6 31 100,81 20.007657-2 31 5,293.95 20-007717.2 31 308,47 20 007718 0 31 1504 '12 20-007177-.2 31 148.92 10-,007781.1 31 146.31 20-907013-2, .31j?. j8 20-00'1837.2 31 519.93 20-00181-d 31.. 9)5.36 26,_661W -4 D 470.0 20-007939.2 31 1.03 -20 1:>4,596 i7-2 3i 9a4.3i 10-000050.0 31 112.41 20.008131-6 31 447,30 20 )08142-0 31 100 RI 20 00111p3-6 31 546 49 20~ppoo 199-8 f 104,35 20-fws 18-A 31 160,40 20-000319:1. 31 8 5,73 70.008321.2 31 141.55 3b:03 3=3 f.. 17:31 30 661 474 3f 14:41 30-015138g.- ..31 4.61 15 6693664 3i 927 og 20.1708390-0 31 88.50 20.008961-2 31 106.42 20.008108-4 31 208.24 20 W8121,111 31 19q.00 20-008759-6 31 137.77 20 008803-6 at 183.81 20.009824-4 31 72.00 20 (W899 6 31 !'{74,71 1~~1a~pa 12/14/8!1 OF.NION SAVINGS A550C141TDN rAGF In TAX Fkt TCH FIAI ANCFS 1'~3 ACCOUNT NSR COOT AMI ACCOUNT NRR COOF. AMT ACCOUNT N8R COOF AMI Accoitm Nq9 rUnF AMI WMIM=o.. 5i, 33i: 0 3,676M51-6 31 43$:6W .Wo°o106:7. -31 -no. 56 id wi&Ai-A 3t 0416 20°008977.2 it 13R,1T 20-009021-2 31 418.31 30-0201SO.0 31 137.17 3n 0;0999.0 it a9 21 2A , 7R_fS.92 ✓ ~I AU1N 1001 GOMM 0'31 TOTAL NRR 703 1OTA1. AMT 20 003913-2 31 272.33 20.003914 0 31 400.56 10.003920.4 31 413,158 20 004218 0 at 34?,74 20_904414.0 31 323.27 20-004544-4 31 241.29 20-004713.2_ 31 34,66 20 004199-8 31 400.10 115-0-04964.0 3}. 273. Id 16 °(108328 4 31 301 7s0 1$-(108810.0 31 i,66 3rl IRAO7 6 8} 544 4 20-005629-2 3t 331.32 70-0056±59.6 31 499,16 20 008897-2 31 404.24 20 O()57gfl 4 31 341.10 20-005950-0 31 180.26 207NO048-4 31 371.56 2g-00009C .0 31 31462.23 20 00630(7 4 31 311. W 1$ 008316 2 31 i27 ?9 70 008179 0 3} 561.08 1008960.4 31 333.09 26 66r0 rit6 6 AT In13,001 20-006816-4 it 393.41 20 007128.0 31 523.55 10-007141-2 31 356.39 20 007733-7 31 M) 51 2Q-0O7297_2 31 538.29 20 007332:4 _.31 515,94 20-207358_0 3,1 3,63 20 007361 6 31 213.20 1 OWN 70 &iYa41•4 39..".381+.98 1"0 007606 i G1 3. i3 3U ooidyo d 306 64 o oii7i7e o` 20-007566-0 31 515.00 20.007605-2 31 51.90 20-007809.2 31 260.43 M007614-0 31 413fl 42 20•007624-4 31, 422.07 20.007669-2 .,-,3,1149,49 20-007678.0, 31 53,05 70 007710.4 31 1,044,94 2f)-0071d6-3 31 :1U8.A8 30 (507,441(2 31 6240.x3 36-66Y§34,-4 31 -p$ 27 7ti IWAj 2 ;I1 7R,i 16 20-007988.4 31 210.56 20-007999.6 31 638,00 20-008040.0 31 464,53 20 008013~2 39 297 11 20-006055-6 31 329,84 20-008101.2 31 317,70 30-008132;4 31 ,$9,35 20 008956-4 31 520,91 1fi Oi)61a 1 2' 31 439.99 20 W82i8 0 31 4. 1U 20 !)0(1794 b 3 f 398.97 2$ Op818p '4 X31 460,32 20.008309-2 31 148.57 20 008312-4 31 .1.009.95 20.0011520.4 31 367.22 20 008341 2 3t ;111.311 20-004386_8 31 299.80 20-008532.4 31 120,41 2U-C09040-0 31 348,74 20,008071-2 31 469,23 1$-006989.3 31 ?ziS, °JA ?0 (N?liT09 2 f 33'j, H. '20 008710 U 31 97,'11 ?U f)604 i ? 3 } 3r`)A I5 20.008742-0 3f 305.90 20 (X)8768 4 284,89 20 -008.184-2 31 306.18 20 OU87'15 n 3t 319 74 22.008793 2 3^ 327.29 20 008812.0 31 331.34 20-009019-6 31 212.09 32 040120 4 it 341.113 32 040165-0 it lFto 41 17 ndr'i}i1i1 l~ 3} 781,3? 1 AUTP iVibi efrildp (03 TUAC FAQ A3 TUAL AMI 6? If% 4 3i ~JO1 98 36-,w4 13=3 31 ~1i~1. 28 20 0b4391 8 31 ~ b.30 X10 O~d8 8 I 0, 8Z 20 iN)ea 12 4 20-004990-0 31 297,34 20.005117.2 of 167,13 20.008494 0 3t b63, t8 20 005526 0 31 530 N6 30:906533-2 31 281.49 20.005555-0 1.3f 607.39 20-005801-2 31 28.93 20 00553010 31 423.40 20.00504.7 51 616.06 70-66U66.7 'pi R1 m:6667 1 e a 3i 8.63 ab ~r~~ii9} ~ 3i 9i'1 64 20.001798-0 31 384.75 20.005912-4 131 $44,93 20-006189-2 31 •70.97 20 006230 0 31 268 60 2 ^006760_4 31, _ 181.55 20-008306-0, 3f 274.05_„ _ 20.009363-6 31 4 2.87 20 M04t4 Q 31 1155,98 20 71-6 31 4§1.91 70 006l~1A-4 31 1b8.04 10-0056B2-X 31 .19 2U 005570 0 3i i44 R4 20.006574-0 31 251.52 20-008887-6 31 229.86 20-0087159-0 31 208.42 20 OOfl823 6 31 640 01 700,48 20:W61139-0 31 089.33 fi01i2 7 31 b88.d5 7p 0~15 Q b6-3 31 ~8 '.§1F b-W7~i39°e 31 31io.39 20 p()J n50 v 31 n 7 20.007186-4 31 2f9,90 20 007219 6 1 787.13 20-007221-2 31 314.te 20 001283 6 31 800 45 29-2907267^6 „ 31 130,64 29,007291.6 31 1,103,41 20-90T292-431 t,4 9.51 20 007333 2 31 108.10 20-003414-0 3i 402.87 20 007493 3 31 911.30 20-oo91T1.8 31 1.07 70 U019i1 fl 31 101 1f) 20°007540-4 31 622.60 20°007567.6 31 85 87 20-001500-4 31 64.01 20 001597 7 31 1.00-1 19 Q 007596.0 31 1,471.2Q8 ZQpo 7599.6 31 1,454..3 20-..• 71p06-0 31 003. 20 007841-2 31 042.41 0=009649 3 3 T i 31~ . 30 c~o9709 1 3 } b37. ~7 2i5 9'l 9 `3 3 t i . 34 zo 6611914 6 5i I 1 44 20.007774-0 31 730.55 20,0077m M 31 858.87 10 001797.8 31 317.154 20 007194 0 31 455 Iw) 20-007809.2 31 242.00 20 001836-4 31 82.51 20-007838.0 31 -199.98 21) 001811 6 31 733 rR 17 /'a~ 1~. 12/19/66 DEMON SAVINGS ASSOCIATION rAOF I+ TAX MAIM( MAIANV..FS 71 ACCOUNT NOR COOF AMT ACCOUNT NAR COOF AMf ACCOUNT NRR COOF AMI ACC0DNt NAR COPF AMI 20-0 Il~fi;=~ ..~1.. 337.10 30 00'1879 a 3l 9119. e4 §0 60-79iS0-~ 31 13211 ?V 6047i a 31 iii rig 20-006012.4 31 731,66 20-008036-0 31 114,01 20-008073-2 31 1119.59 20-008081.6 31 2"!7 Al 20 61qp -4 31 4PI.28_ 20.006115-6 31 322.30 20-000124-4 31 291.91^ 20-00>d128-4 31 206.03 309~b6 9 31 35.99 2'O OQb~Bl7 1 3~ Z79,$t 30 0-'0 tA9 Z 3~ ~13.9A ?0 009190 0 a"s iiii -ti 20-008207-6 31 502.99 20.008221.2 31 572.71 20°008231-0 31 99.69 20 006789 2 31 144 Aq 20-008433-; , 31 264.44 20°0011575.6 31 322,65 20-008693.6 31 330,69 20,008628-4 31 210,4ri W-6ui! b-o sl M. z3 oa®~8i:o it PCwj ao 66V6i 5 3i 554.94 30-WAM ~ 5i iii . jk 20-008887-6 31 21634.41 20.0011920-4 31 262,74 20-008930-0 31 801.38 20 008992.4 31 1,071 49 20-0009 2 31_.. 302.29 20-008990.0 31 359.5f 20.009026.4 31 153.00. 30 070136 0 31 IMFI, 1 ibbi oa~'11i+ F) i3 Fa7ii F#AR ioa jlii'ri1 AM1 AfT,~~ ~n f ?O Ob33a374 _.3i 297.35 39 1)03999.9 3 375. ie 5-0,664-099-03 31 0 07.33 30 Ooh FA 6 3i ;x311 ')0 20-004340-4 31 200.55 20-004358-0 31 289.83 20.004362-0 31 335.09 20-0041,10-4 31 29q,95 20-004428-4 31 279.48 20-004437.2 31 307.9? 20-004709-2 31 290,88 20 004837 4 31 344.19 20 0a13tS0:1 31 '29$.93 20 1)05909 31 201).34 10-001998-4 31 339.21. 20 (x19433 4 3i 37', 39 70-005466-0 31 816.40 20 0093689 2 31 317.05 204()05737-j 31 350.01 20 OMSA71 2 31 390 12 20-005949.20 31 367.70 20-005952-4 31 401.59 20.006066-031292.40 20 006124 4 31 900.27 ?0-008190: 31 •330.12. _ 3U-~09217 31 u03.18 30~ 0t)1i11A-~ -3i '360.8._. 70 1!053ti'S ? 31 473 fig 20.006274-0 31 372.87 20.006215-8 31 354.62 20-006337.2 31 347.78 20 00"340 O nI 500.01 20.006446-0 31 321.32 20-008542.0 31 304.15 20-006576-4 31 491.36 20 000630 0 31 340. SO 70- 7 B:4 ai 304.98 56bl1fS'773 2 31 3.1)3 56 -008B9d-0 31 107.08 26 OOIrl49 3 ,I 3pA i7 20.007248-2 31 352.70 20.007319 6 31 63.79 70 007329 2 3f 401.31, 20 Q01401 0 31 7'15.14 20-007459-031 312.78 20-007948-4 331 1 za=00781 ~91 fU 20'007550-0 56 750 p 31 254-1 1~- 70 1001691 6 31 419.10 55-1 51 3igAi 55:667 7 i3 z C6 n 31 517 95 20-007846-0 31 344.42 20-007854-0 31 325.42 M001932 4 31 292.02 20 008070 0 31 341,69 20-008092.4 31 311,79 20.098119.5 31 164.08 20-008215-6 31 234.11 20.008110 0 31 315.27 r ?0-609812-0 31 319.99 30:006755 4 31 30x.04 M 664917-e 31 1e2,43._ 30 020108 4 3 1 3156 i3 30.020167-6 31 364.22 30-020116--4 31 353.78 30 02018t-2 31 309.01 30 020193 " 31 295.07 32.040107.6 31 246,14 32-040110-'0 31 96 32.040112.4 31 313.11 32-040113 2 31 310.31 aj:a181ie-6 -3i 351.88 3z=ni5i3~ a 3i 3i 3~3.7i3~. a ~4iII;1A 6 i 3~; 50 ~3~ 3i 040135 e 32.040143-8 3f 334.06 32 040163.2 31 3"0.13 32 040194.0 31 357.03 32 040150 4 31 310 27 A 11TH 1001 GROUP 034 107AL NRR Af 10TA1 AM1 27,015.05 20240-4 31 w 85026 20-004294-0 31 9 ,00 20-004459 -0 73/10_ 451.10 20-004411-6 31 691.47 , 20- 7 3- 31 2f5. Q8 20-_-884801-2 3f 63 IO 20004817 2 31 221.01 20-004936-0 31 500.00 38:00 5 3_: `__31__. - 1n 9e 369375--1 31 1406 15§5 H 20 6-06564-6 5' 13 20 6-09551-4 3 i 93 i . s 20-006688-4 31 428.04 20-006805-2 31 1 33 70-00"866.0 31 22.72 20'005923-6 31 471 92 10.006100-) 31 146.83 20.006127-6 31 330.91 20-000102-0 31 678,26 20006213-2 31 297 86 70 ooiilAa:~ 51 1H.3d 36:weSiB=e 31 . MAi 56 MA@if-i 3i 1,190,0'9_..._ 30 &CA03 A 3i 6A i7 20-000767-2 31 362,80 20-007`57-2 3f 1,664.54 20-007164-4 31 383.63 20.007109.2 31 '74 4" 20-007129-2 31 356.41 28-007342-0 31 110.19 20.027340-4 31 322.78 0-007405-.2 3f 71 1..06 115-004w7-# 91 - IN,J1 3~d-667$`7:e 5'1 945 28 20=567789.6 Si 446.33- 1666fli -1 3i 311 a() 20-008008.0 3f 594.66 20.006083-6 31 122.39 20-000093-2 31 341.51 20 008171 0 31 521,16 20-008227.0 31 441,99 20-008379-0 31 373.02 20.008300-4 31 313.02 20-008381-2 31 373.07 17/ iq/"1 t?/19/!1!1 OFNION SAVINRS ASSOCIA1Tt" rAOF fP 1AX 8AIC14 BALANCES 1133 ACCOUNT N6R COOS AMT ACCOUNT NRR CODE AMT ACCOUNT NOR CODE AMT ACMINT NAP Ct'11F AMT M-MAY16-8 .fb=b5398•idV ,11 'fin 59 '35'&4W:3 31 '~i:~8 20 oii8873 8 3i i~g. ~o 20"W"840-2 31 199.30 20-000990-0 31 240.90 20-006676-4 31 195.40 20 0081177 2 31 198.40 125,40 - jot ' 95. A6 26 4 20-0011911-4 31 95,4S 20 ~Dg8661 2 31 196-41? ' 7~ Si38I8l"~ 38-~3i 3 i ......8'. 8e6 3 3 i i .6 ~ . e4 696.4 31 1f8.40 20.008897.2 31 195,40 20 00A910 0 31 1.192 1!19 9.006692 ~ 31 1 .~ps955-6. , 31 40111[2 20-g4957-2. 167.01 20-0011905_? 31 1.93 20 006'0!66.1 31 223 10 =Wail 3i M.n7 36 i~a9:8 ~i 383:33 zu"0~90~`a z 31 8:25 ao 6WH•7 ii i4i 7i 20.009042.0 31 67.83 20.009049-2 31 218.31 20-009050.0 31 212.25 20 0080.)54 0 31 .19.47 20 009047.2 31 26,194.16 20.004061.2_ 31 37,14 20-009068.4 31 _91.77 30 020147 6 31 389,38 RUTH 1001 ROUE 0V35 TD1AL NOP 8o. TOTAL AMI 55,253.60 ✓ ~dt~~ ~t I .if /t,~ r,l,+l l ~'{1~/ rS ! ?.-003302.0 32 _ 253.7)328-003929-4 32 895,84 20-004543-8 32 88.18 20.004967-6 32 465.66 2~ oiiisi7~ 3 33 3do:~e J 1569W A 33 1196.5i 36:i)W84 4 32 3. iii 70 1X~6+~iia o 39 31`. Ni; 20.005601-2 32 906.08 20-0011629-2 32 477.33 20.005948.4 32 408.28 20 009NA8 4 32 407 99 29- 028-4 32 2,056.79 20.006306-0 32 394.82 20.010~6e361-2 32 30.12. 2(1 006410 0 32 171.89 30-0491-1 55 Otis 3o-6oe49z 4 33 567.78 z`.63Ai162-o a2 -mi. 65 56 bi-)Aikhq 4 32 i4 47 20.006629.2 32 543.09 20.005769.2 32 474.10 20-006829.2 32 950.67 20 006936 4 32 119 44 20.296969-2 32 184,46 20.007002.0 32 105.13 22;007001-2 32 1 8.15 20 001047-6 32 109.05 30=007576 a a5 4;c3,2§ z6.6693i8 5 32 596.3~ 30-007416-0 35 6.97 36 i,n7474 A 37 i6i.94 20.007439-6 32 106.06 20-007459 6 32 455.919 20.007540.4 32 196.99 20 0010;74 4 32 EU8.U1 20-0_07635-6 32 145.23 20-007645-2 2 101.64 20°007456-4, 32 11.41 20 007884 0 32 208.01 20-607678-6 35 I6.7;1 364kO1 Ofi 4 376463 26 66171)iJ 2 32 3. $5 70 iX0 Hii 4 37 ? ii; 93 20.007743-6 32 530.00 70.007788 4 295.92 20-007848.4 32 209.91 7f. 14119790, 37 48$ 80 20-007884-4 32 381-01 20-007688 4 32 1,030.49 2Q°007959-6 32 74.99 20 001971 6 32 174,45 26-664Of6:6 32 889.24 26 b68i)i6-4 51 139.79 20 ooa043.8 35 l1."s1 .Y)p!44 ? 47 5;iili 20-006218-0 32 89.29 20 W8230.0 32 644.10 20.008245-2 32 261.44 20 iK1821115 2 37 70R,73 20;000293-2 32 146.75 20-0982W 32 239.25 20-008337.2 32 125.73 20 008807 8 32 29'7.13 20.66MV-4 33 371.H 46*0066i8 8 35 574484 2d 068807-6 •12 -06.14 7(1 ~.K)NP';7 4 37 Al i4 20.006741-2 32 489.77 20.008767-6 32 131.58 20 008797 A 32 321.53 2G WA!18U 4 32 281.50 24 100685-2 32 2 1.50 g g-220130-0 32 2,69,07 30-0201$2-9 32 2 Q.'79 30 070183 6 32 325.52 33=63649-i3 33 1 2.96 a •026369.5 H W 00 3c) o5c5517=z 33 8.71 13 1Atil~i 3 h9 bna ia'i 92.040126-0 32 337.98 32-040164.4 32 479,29 AUTII 2001 nontir, 011 IOTA1. NPR 07 TOM AMT .12,gA9.641,7 70-003692.4 32 392.T01 7.0004471-8 32. 996. 19' 20.0046112-4 37 443,67 20 (()49984 32 489,70' 20-005104.4 32 655.81 ' 20-005397.2 32 982.25 20-005402-0 32 948.53 20 X)'3527.8 32 472 28 20-(109834-0 32 5?2 i7 20 009824 A ~3 32LS~9 50 0617828-4 32 3''37,75' 7p txi§i 1y 4 37 ~%4 U4- 70-005918-4 32 iS13.12, 20-000482.0 32 977.15 20-008189-2 32 162.81 70 0043713 2 32 471 94 20_006276.4 32 315 16'.._ 20-, M312-4 32 323.751 20.006337-2 32 443.84 ' 20 0¢468-0 32 131,63 ' 46-666439-A 35 376.01 26-008498-6 95 5A3 98' 20.068924-4 32 136.92 215 7 37 Aomij oil 20-CO8636-0 32 94,38, 20-00604v4 32 731. 031 ' 20-000'197-2 32 980.34 20 0 32 949 on 30 00'1936-0 32 I19'BA;L 20 MMO A 312 Q62.H 36:661093.8 3? 0.65 rr 1~}1 720 6 NMi$I i] U -f i '371 1tfS1 20-007544-4 32 705.51 20-007583-8 32 293.80 20.001614 0 32 671.98 20 007868 4 32 7, 183. 20- 20-9977,2,1 -A32, 1,254,26 20.007711.6 32 243,17' 20-007849-2 32 -135.20 20 007818.0 32 7718.rw 17; ,o~lla .rj Y I 7~' 1720 Cr_n^ L7 ;G.w~ ~ C33 x.,.~ w ...:,,,,n 4u CM i f rMr-t s. ~ ~w.eiK: d ~ . J ~ ~ ~ J ~ 1` f 1` J.. ~ ~ 1 "+~d..; 1:~)f"j . R l "f ~.ye ~T N+. y' j e~ I F , . ; 4; .j' O,c2 Cj"*jOLMTOM, rffJ i MUNICIPAL SUILDiNG / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.sm February 26, 1986 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician THRU: William J. Anderson, Assistant Director of Finance SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund RECOMMENDATION: Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued. SUMMARY: Chapter 31, Section 31,11 of the Texas Property Tax Cade requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing for refunds in excess of $500.00. Taxpayer Garland Cates, has requested a refund in the amount of $961.76 for a double payment of his City tax account number 3940-00800. BACKGROUND: Mr. Cates paid these taxes on December 31, 1985 and his mortgage company also paid these taxes on the same day. Our records show payments of $1,923.52 against a 1985 tax rase of $961,76, Difference to be refunded between the correct and incorrect amounts. FISCAL IMPACT: $961.76 to be refunded. Respyctfully submitted, VI-etor Schneider Tax Technician liam Anderson Asaistdiit Director of Finance Tex ft" Application' 31011 (2/82) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Namur' Collecting Tax For: : ,1 M n e ~yr, `TMG 0e . (Taxi "I units) WWI T -1 Cityo state zip' Code, r wwwww+wr wwwwww w~rwrr rr++r wMrwlr+++ww+wrwrw+wwrrwr+rwwrww ww+wrwwwwnw Y+rwr+w Yrw In order to apply for a tax refondg the following information must be provided by the taxdaye0Q IDENTIFICATION OF PROERTY OWNER: Name : Address: U34 200wa Telephwnt er (Ir a ona Information nee IDENTIFICATION OF MOPERTY: Description of Pr*rty: J Ad-dress r oca o o roper : Account Number of ,arty: or ax p er: INFORMATION ON PAY NT OF TAXES: Nan of Taxing Una Year for Amount of Tax From Which Refund Which Refund Data of the Amount of Tax Refund Is_Reguested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested 1. C'.L.. a,•l ~ti., rg ~1 3/ /19 -5 t S 3. w r+.r.nrw+ r.• rw~rr~wwr.w .w~rrwrrrr. Taxpay is reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): Z aQ_Nd nnr.~ to. Q~k CAL act "I hereby #pply for the refund of the above described taxes and certify that the !information I have given on this form is true and correct." 5',gna'ture Date of Application M-Tax-Refund w+wrrw wwrrrww~wwwrrwrr wwwrrrrrrrwwrr rrrwrrr rrrwrrrrrrrr rrrrrwrrwrrrrrr rr rr rrrrr DETERMINATION' FOR TAX REFUND: r__.. Approval Disapproval gna re o r ze officiF Date gna re o Presiding offlUrts) o ax ng Date Unit(s) for refund applications over SSW 6 - ~ L I~ + ri 3 L Z i~ A,NR`N ` t(+~~~ i MIY on Somm cAT" A rDL# swan rota 0e61.a, L r, 756 afoot SAWA WWKA PH. W-ISO Donow, row "ol PAY TO Tf* DRDfR Of $ N I ~~~Emh - +fi 61 001 to R 5 1,y Oentfon rs w. wavy b~9' 7' Dorton, Tar m~D-P1►39i~O^WeooD • a:~~i9p21~.4t: 0?560'239 6250' 8000000961?660 a ,i • J 'jk' .a u' t.. DATE: 03/04/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT D. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF COOPER LANDING SECTION III; PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLAT OF INDUSTRIAL SCH M IDDITION, LOT SR, BLOCK 1; AND THE PRELIMINARY REPLAT OF THE SUMMIT ADDITION, LOTS I AND 2, BLOCK 1 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the above referenced plats and replats. All plats and replats meet the requirements of the subdivision regulations and land development code. The preliminary replat of the Summit Addition is the only proposal with a recommended condition requiring City Council discretion. SUMMARY: In the order as listed above, the plats and replats will accommodate the following land uses as proposed: 112 4-plex units north of Windsor and east of North Locust; multi-family (MF-1) along the south side of Texas Street, west of Bell Avenue; multi-family north of Allegre Vista extension and west of Dallas Drive. BACKGROUND: Not applicable PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Res fully %u itted: arre 1 City Manager Prer red by' - ~t,(,l ason, en or anner App e x v , ector a lanning and Development CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March 41 1986 SUBJECT; Approval of the Preliminary Flat of Cooper Landing, Section III, lots 1-40 block 1 f SUMMARY: In April, 1984, a 127 acre mixed use planned development (PD-72) was approved for property along the north side of Windsor Drive, east of N. Locust. Sixty-one (61) acres of single family detached (241 lots) approved as Cooper Crossing, Section One is currently under construction. Cooper Landing, Section one, which consists of twelve (12) duplex lots on 2.30 beginning at the extreme northeast corner of N. Locust and Windsor is fully developed. The proposed preliminary plat contains 6.96 acres and 4 lots out of a section of the planned development approved for duplex/four-plex use. The total area approved for duplex/ four-plex use is approximately 28 acreat approved overall density is 12 units per acre. The developer is planning twenty-eight (28) four-plex buildings (112 total units for the 6.96 acres). An extension of Hell Avenue that will curve to the west and ultimately connect with N. Locust will provide primary access to this portion of the planned development. Sixty feet (601) of right-of-way and collector street standards (41' to 45' of pavement width) is planned for the Bell Avenue extension. The planned development conditions require sidewalks along both sides of Bell Avenue. Sidewalks are also required along both sides of Windsor Drive as a condition of this planned development. Comprehensive site plan approval is required prior to final plat approval and issuance of building permits. Proposed 10' sanitary sewer and 10" water lines along Bell Rvenue are adequate to serve this site. A drainage easement along the east side of the property is required to carry water down Windsor Drive. Adequate electrical, telephone, gaga and cable facilities are in place or available for extension. t x i ' ,4.,,+ -vas y.F,-rv -,-4* . '4 city council Back-up Summary Sheet (PD-72) March 4, 1986 Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. reduced preliminary plat 2. Overall concept plan 3. Copy of PD Ordinance ham dQv-M r* David Ellison Senior Planner 1571g ix "LEW x"D Ks* fMM va XONp A S r. UJIVG;UAL OJrV&4oMetar Coco. r swot s se' e> ar. f+ SCALE i'0100' t." A" I errs o •K e^o / ~ LOT 2 0 !o' loo' Sod I r/~ ~ o d I + JOE ULIW Z0N6D +4240D) lr% N►V6 tl.lM: ~ A% st'ii'tI" 7o S7e.134 of I i +a ~°c GCN(lAL No7td: I -r'J LOT ♦ c I l h ~ ~ ~ ~ - nro c,r/sriNy ft,Cacr~pC!. _ . . i.r,wK a Nt M,/,/bt raro¢dAMY ~,vrryt ,wrrcxllrto. - Vre Avr .P :ae• YCAt P[aoD PL4w, COOPER LANDING 11 - Y' III W I~ sNE1,1111"t PLAY.. b I Wr 1.4 CLOCK 1 I 000PER L AMM110 SEC; "REE •s7. ( M~MAI~`M1. "~1 Y/MIN/ WL4" Is TMf W, iwAW* t GSeh✓w I TING %fili AM 10 06- , M NMf . t~Rt~ yV/Na DIt1Yi, Alf Law. iii CsumrNx'wlKtt>t uKC ~ 1 OWN& JAR Ims" Ir NO AN ORDIMCL AMMING THE ZONIMG MAP 07 THE CITY Or DZN1'ON, TE7.AS, AS SAM WAS ADOPTED T" AN APPENDIX TO THE CODA OF ORDMKZS Or TU CITY OF DIET MI , BY ORDEMANCZ NO, 69-1, AND AS SAID NAP APPLIES TO APIAO:JUTELZ 127.484 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE A.B.S. i C MOR .IE.R.PACMAXY R is SURVEY CA2bE iN 1%AkDD nlLCt.Ais OUNTY AN Em6'M~VE DATE. THE COUNCIL Or THE CITY Or DZWMO TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. The Zooias Classification and Use designation of the following described property, to-wit: 1 1: All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the 548#50 i C•A.A. Company survey, Abstract No. 166 in the City and Counter of Denton. Texam; the said tract being all of a called 100.643 acre tract and part of, a called 40.891 acre tract, both tracts described in deed from J. Newton Rasor to Jesse Newton Rasor, at sl recorded in Volume 3410 Pale 6S4 And 633 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being more particul►rly described as followss BEGINNING for the northwest corner of the tract being described herein, at the northwest corner of the said 100.695 acre tr;ct, said point being in the east right-of-way line of T.M. Highway bicw. 2164 (North .'.ocust Street) at its intersection with the north linty of the s.id B.S.S. 4 C.R.A. Survey, northerly 26.3 feet from an irot rod found at a lento corner; B.ME south $9°28'26" east with the north line of the said 100.6695 acre tract and the north line of the said B.B.B. 6 C.R.A. Co. Survey and a distance of 1401.66 feet to an iron rod set for the most northerly northeast corner of the said 100.693 acre tract; TN8NICE south 01°18'34" was.: with the west line of the said 100.693 acre tract a distance of 25A .35 feet to a fence corner; .'HENCE south $$°02'08" east along a fence a distaace of 312.31 feet to as iron rod found at a fence corner for the most easterly northeast corner of the said 100.695 acre tract; THENCE south 01°O1'OO" west aluns an old fence line, passio6 at 497 feet the southeast corner of the said 100.695 care tract and the northeast corner of the said 40.891 acre tract, sad continuing along the saw courts, to all, a total distance of 1026.32 foot to an iron rod set for corner in the north line of Windsor Drive as sonment on the grrund; THENCE north 89°40'30" west with the isid north line of Windsor Drive a distance of 1709.48 fat to an iron rod found in the "at right-of-way line of T.M. 2164 (North Locust Street); TEMI north 00'23'00" east with the oast right-of-way line of F.M. 2164 and the vest lino of the said 40491 aers tract, passing at 565 its nor at corner, q; a, balag the southwest corner d$ the said 100.695 acre treat and t-ontioulal along the same course, is all a total diataace ei 1072.26 feet to as iron red "oKad at an aag a point in the said lino; TB~Ct north 01028146" east continuing with the "at right-of-say limo of T.M. 2164 and the west lima of the said 100.695 sere tract 'R;....~'a~.. •ezv. ran-: -tf..L c :w'r. x*. r.: _ a distance of 2S26.32 feet to the place of begimmia8 aid emeleeiaS 123.352 acres of land. It All that certain tract or parcel of land situated is the C.R.R. Company Surveys, Abstract NO- 186 is Cho City sad County of Denton, Tax" ; the said tract being a part of the called 40.891 acre tract described is the decd from J. Newton 1"Or to Jesse Newton Razor, at al recorded in Volume 541, Pap 653 of the Deed Records of Denton County , Texas; the said tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING for the southwest corner of the tract being described herein, at an iron rod set for the southwest corner of the said 40.891 acre tract, said point being in the east riSht-of-way line of P.M. Highway 2164 (North Locust Street); TRENCL north 00''23'00" east with the east right-of-w41 line of P.M. 2164 and the west line of the said 40.891 acre tract a distance of 410.97 feet to an iron rod set in the south line of Windsor Drive as moaumented on the ground; THIMI south 89a40'30" seat with the south line of Windsor Drive a distance of .''4.28 feet to an iron rod found in the vest line of the tract de..4vibed in the dead from Jesse Newton Razor, at al to Denton Independent School District recorded in Volume 533, Pate 558 of the said Deed Records; TIM = south 00°33'08" west with the west line of the said Denton Independent School District tract a distance of 413.71 feet to an iron rod found at an anSle point in the south line of the said 40.891 acre tract; THEM north 89°19'00" west with the south line of the said 40.891 acre tract and clan a fence part of the way a distance of 434.65 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 4.132 acres of land. is hereby chanted from ASricul~ural "A" District Classification Use to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas with the following conditions and specifications: 1. Sixty (60) foot of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Bell Avenue. 2. rinal utility layout, street alignment, curb cut and driveway locations, and overall plans for access shall be deterwined during the site plan approval and/or plat processing atate. 3. The floodway/open space area (with exeapins of the drainage channel), landscaped eul-de-seca and entries shall be privately maintained. The Cit} of Denton must review and approve a written proposal or agreement outlining specific maintenance responsibilities before building permits are issued. 4. Duplexes fronting Windsor Drive shall be sio#le story and must conform with normal Cit;i of Denton zoning ordinance requirements. 5. Single family section shall conform to SP-7 soning ordinance standards. 6. Unless otherwise approved as part of the PD proposal, the multi-family suction sha:l conform with ME-1 xoaLag ordinance standards- 7. Specific site plan approval is waived for all two fe"ii and single family land use; specific site plan approval is Z-162640= DIM-PAM fWO +1 Y sz. 4~~ r F`R;z; se- :fir.. .-_-•w~r'r~•..,. ~,r°~' 7~ 's'x required for multi-family, neighborhood service and garden home sections. S. Pedestrian bridge. extended across the floodway/open space by use of daa required for the detention pond. 9. Sidewalks along both sides of Bell Avenue.. 10. Sidewalks constructed by developer along both sides of Windsor Drive; sidewalks along one side of all interior streets shall be required throughout the dam lopsont. 11. The development shall conform with the approved PD concept plan. 12. If 25 percent of the development, with a ssiaLums of S percent single family, is not developed within five (5) years toning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) class~fioatiou. The Zoniag Man of the City of De.atos, Texat, adopted the. 14th day of January, 13169, as an Appendix to the. Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1, be., and the sane is hereby amended to show such change in District Classifica- ti.ac and Use subject to the above coaOttions and specifications. SECTION U. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a eoaprohensivo plan for the purpose of promotiag the onerai welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, saoag ocher things for the ch.Tacter of the district and fog its peculiar suitability or particular uses, &ad with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit La the. City of Denton, Tuns, and its citizens. SECTION M. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect Lmodi- ately after its psssage and approval, the required public hs,sriugs having heretofore been hold by the Planning and Zoniag Commission and the City Council of the City of Dmaton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ~ day of I' 1964. CI Oh NO TEXAS ATTEST: ~`ALLI . CZTFMCMIARt CITY 01 DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED A$ TO L29AL INN: C. J. U UM JR. CUT ATTORM CITY OY DQPRM 1i +'F ^s 1 i h. ~ *"4+h~4'. ="?~S S•iT'T`~.°. `."r*":+ t.'~..~,k§#?a rte. cz.7 1 tM.M MIIM * 11A QOM M ~r + 0" ~ SON" a NM/M► M" r NJ RAAKY r M ~rM Mom of.mow" A+ I / ll{ t 1 i rr • ftOOMAY/OPIIN SMACI , ASW OAIOlN FIOA/~ ~t>w ~t>trl►r •rroom wopsm rr ~ irk M W &Am"* #SAW f ....u...r.wam ' ti, t wltrs ~'~r' . I ~-ff VOWS' nNMpae ~wwr~rw. 11 0 cR*wL Fn^7`=y't~ a} FR±"'F .iMw..°= Vie. rt;5 OWL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March 4, 1986 SUBJECT: Approval of the Preliminary and Final Replat of Industrial School Addition, Lot 8R, Block I SUMMARY: The purpose of this proposed replat is to combine existing lots 8 and 9 into one lot. The existing lots are approximately 50' in width. The site is zoned multi-family (NF-1) and begins adjacent and south of Texas Street approximately SOU feet west of Bell Avenue, Multi-family redevelopment is anticipated, Existing 6" sanitary sewer and 12" water located along the Texas Street frontage of this property are adequate. All other public utilities and facilities are adequate, ACTION REQUIRED: Recommend approval RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ALTERNATIVE: Recommend approval ATTACHMENT: Reduced plats b a _ David Ellison Senior Planner 1572g 1 4 TtXA0 OTr"? Lowy, 00'90.L,m Wane onat i awr~~ I JI JL_ ~ 1 f I t f ' f N I u I y I q I rr I i LOTI IR 1 OL06R, Ir f YYppyy~f{{ 7G 1tof a 1kY►KIi f ~ I I ~ I 1' LOOATIOM YAr• 100' I N.f Y N rim I a w~~.rw n.ue rp ~ iI If I . X11 MMtL01M1A0T AORAf INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL ADDITION LOT OR. @LOCK I MM A 007tAT K 1070 0 AMO S. KOOK 11 MKMNMML me"" AOOMT M. 410110" 0 VOL. 00, h. 710. 0000 OOOOOUO, 0.0. T. F f+r ra am a .wwM fYaJYN wiw~al. aat a LO. 0 R on. 00. mmvt 4100 r•. Ono hOOrnm tlMMw MY 0 O ail d O- VI MAO 10lVIOTOIy INDUSTRIAL W OM AM"1011 oM►KtA LOT SW {LOCK 1 AML~R II7tIEYATh1NL KIVOTOKiIKT M 11 I= -0 PAW* a ~wir~raw Ns~ Ti/1 JO! fA1. a ~'~R Y tf 61 Ctr1O6 OM a TRts mLIT+ OF YfnYal t~fa/, f.ta i.tarrtl.rl ].aataaka r u. .ear W . tftct 04 wGnatWra tr L.L,, 6 C.I.A. aOa to d, 6oaool, wr o arbo Ira r 101~14"1 01 14"1 laCoveyoaae.a0teTaaw,, WAS W to bolos aft yiy 031. , a.ay/o1 « tr V.aW, 07 761 Y tr NM r aha« M lO r/04 etlaa0 I hers/ boxy W 6roo Traa, tr art. Woe rasa r Las 1 W 1, &,tH 1 .t Hr faMiwri ,tAwl UL cud 61 9404 raoraW la T.lm eft, {y. ,U H tho pN LyNo of rN r.rr/, ad bows bon td71 hrt+11M r Colima: A6wrs at to Ira 1694 tar the aw"w .orekwLL anav N IAa lraortlral teat. to tr aaaw _ rlptvt-ar lift of Twr Nt«t. rN P" N« boll ON Ke.~ Lt two 1. movehoom W tM 44ftr~tNW swuni«t arbor a< • trot of WW qW °Y~ of TVA$ 1TII MT LLtl7, t0' R.O.Y. 0% "Am ItT.I OA Attu Cwat/ A04 to w/ol t't`aTi1 u ]a R. ffhtaar. No &ad tw.r/W to Tatar 7tr • tLHItI0t1 Tra« $Aq c" kre a 31 afe"" SO wow* Rey. ors wr aaCaltal aaK Ur W rtl hata 7aatktttaaaw epaftnowt ~ IM ul tr "&"LW Mot Ito of SAW stM.p told, o tlarw W 10.71 bK Is ft left 1 M if" 1w of a Coto of lW0'"Alm art mom of t" MnL W tnWµ, borN ~ yy~ al. W W W Omm, Cawtr %=W trrw nt Irwr r 6" 1" 1 b n«rii tow Was, Il1r pfo i I "Mae North M /st.ot 71 LL«t" N pons Mae. old" tr 094+"04 oath SAM of am At" I«Warwrl i tr«t ad «N l.ta 6 W t, Mal" the aaa"W etrWny Carr of MW Aa w L CoUIr trot, eft oar t is fl N N MINA tnk poge W rNOUK war "of 4 Mtrot W Ira u to Nol C. I& QWa N 4"d rwor/W Is t r a i I Iqo 7n W eft for Ow" Uo C6•r so" oo Amara. "N"W" .aw mt sold yaw. is aft • "timitswo, I" a W. I"m 0" W or=. LOT 0 fey- 100.,7 f«t a a uw ".I tco tr Of a tr f moot of rah, low .ot c~ W eft wo"N rarrtLW cCOCt, ftf6 ~10 l« >K M ~t.rrya~~tirr 7 8= f _ I + f Tr,at Nonh ~ k WlwtrW arbor of a f con"a to W Firm And S K O rvh M brew. Lt/.rIK, by `^'4 boa. A. Hf I I rLt 119 aft t+ On r Lt.a. oterr And 6rwrai boa, fn.7f/ 0.424 ACgEa 6alr«a 70 atom" Is aon.6a Yaaa . tr .94."04 trot, W tow tat L, r the Ka"W "a ltao rN Ogtt of Oy MK llto t( o.N ,boro ragr«t1w1 i ft' f«1 on for tr wtAwat tour M the homm 6acrt1aa trot, bola i04 trw ►Wt,at a air Nat bows al" to 10.71 foot o ' I wwh rl -w-M llr W ow'ara ftrat! to dr atcolW f Thowa ,wth» _ fr "a"" M a""" Lao, aw " w o"A"aam Ito It am tort Ioaraatuml tract mod «N Lou A W 6! W the atwNoa ooatk ffel.t-otnry lw W MN Tay LerOt. a uKOWAS W 100.7r fM 4 W hlat W a Im W crtsl0lN 0,{71 ww 04 IW, ROY, T1tlpOM. IIIOY 1LL IWI N tT ilL7L r609fM: Tat I, IrWelu brow, Trrtao IW tear Ioarattaftl IaaCao W a. t, M 1 rrsM MwrflW HetaNY a Not 6f, block 1 M tr 1401011101 Sa"I WJONO" 060" " to Lbs Come" ~ #Lot W NoWt0'»'W w Way 661 cot to tr ps"It roo toowr the A"444,0 rI c at••.Ufa, a0arat. Mir thoa«. a V IL, Pa.tew w f7 ya.h AiNT" Iran or rLU, II i IWan a. the Mfonlat04 MwoT Mitt Co tM US" of rMr, s MO aft Mrrr7lr "p" M6r1a { R 7 j bra. Tram for 6w low"terot 1 owWaaa9. loam to a r be the WON, W« tar to oOlretW t• w 1 r I ` I I a "Al" 1"43 t ad wkaorlWp6 to r lMt r anstAf tr rr /W tr rorlor W a wbmti errata oalet«w awe to tM cyowtf oow, Olroo ewer of U" W weal ti offl<o Ots the for at a'I~- CW.CW of caaalWw aa►Iroa1 lUR Y.L_YOL9 CLtTf II ire 7t0Y 614 M LT TLLSL ML MI Tat 1. Raab" ltaa6taaaa, ltapOtWW ►n611t Sawrar, 4 hw*f wtttr ON two r7r W 660%Vttw nn 1rrlanl Ira r aterl W wwroa wwvo~ r W trawl W NW tr law "r wr trrw aw OWN oaor q WI►e.l►1r to ocaalaaco with tin w. a 'marry !f V A. S 3 J ■.fa. ms R-E 0 A. rA atw omis7 c1' M R~rOfll t` La A"J"Ll ~ •.1~4 A0~ ' L r a m w !110's A" I Lm a me L am 1 IROw~ ■ w~ aLM08. 11 9494•. r RECEIVED FEB 7 MINION Iwo alrmwrt:aMl u6► IariT ~ / ilt oat NI oat aaaa0n ~ wlm .mambo. i. t 5-., c" ..x„n . s. ~ ,-u • `a 4 r f."- a ~ a...~ 4 ' , ? g~+ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: March 4, 1986 SUBJECT: Preliminary replat of the Summit Addition, Lots 1 and 21 Block 1 SUMMARY: This tract is 13.7 acres in size and located at the southeast corner of Johnson and Daugherty Streets. The property is zoneO commercial (C), and multi-family development is anticipated. Allegre Vista, a collector street, must be extended approximately 1,050 feet west to a point perpendicular with existing Johnson Street. Existing Johnson Street is built to residential street standards, and is inadequate to serve high intensity and high density uses that are in place and planned. The Development Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission are recommending that the developers of this tract place curbing along the southern terminus of existing &'ohnson Street to prevent a future connection of Dallas Drive and I-35. If Johnson Street from I-35 to Dallas Drive is extended and connected in the future, an,9 already hazardous intersection at Dallas Drive and Johnson Street,.,,, will have to accommodate more commercial traffic. Daugherty Street and a railroad crossing are representative of other substandard transportation facilities in the vicinity that would also be impacted, if a connection is made. All other public facilities and utilities are adequate and available for extension. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of the preliminary replat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval with the condition that Johnson Street be terminated and turned to the west to form a 90 degree connection with Daugherty Street and that permanent curb be installed at developer's expense with plans for said curb submitted in conjunction with a final plat. Ire xn4.ari~r,~t'a~y c.~t aq=yc,•^:7' ;%~cs ,>rrl ~~"`r+.:rfa ~_;'r+'a~« fix. ~ City Council Buck-up Summary February A, 1986 Page 2 ALTL-'NATIVES: 1. Approval of the preliminary replat with condition as recommended 2. Approval without condition 3. Denial of the preliminary replat ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced plat 2. Letter of October 9, 1985 4WY David Ellison Senior Planner 13429%1 I AIIIA IO~T I I ~ 1 •1'► # SON" P, ry~ .t;rIay L.~ aM K Ot*a 1f1. r wow is ..yN •w t. C~ • ..N«...n.b WCkTY. MAP l aaraw ia'a0' ww A/ GO ,Lo auraartlr~tyw some JK awawaaT SMI'm ,yam . 5 i r r :V 'rrrc ra ~ ' 7WIT i NNW 117 aid mw" of O"To"In or ,~iiuwwla PRELNY AFB KPLAT SIM A. irt~ .auovdr AS` 00 LOTf f aal'': P , OaMk11: aIIYD ~ aIlOTL1~N11ati1 "r' . ` i►iT cAlrt a1; ~Htt ~ !D aana mom M ~ 110N aa! Nor I r L ' rM4*il4,rM 01 IMyM.[W . I. fed • ~ 3 b y~wyM~M db ~~iwRtwa rt•q ~ i ~ 1. ~ ~ r. . r awiai~a e11fN.1~lMYr1 S✓•~ a., .«2 =1;,r 'r; ,r;fi=4 ~y,: ^R~4'a~..i~yi`#.Ye ~_~i, t al.s i. _ _ _ ' - ..i~A6'1ka, isl.sdiclS.a.c.~., ..i ::!iuw...fJ.'.~'rri•~:$~'12aiwLrc~c. - ~itla'.a. ma'+uA c° ~M ar,.'I~~~s '.~~.°rS~. a,'~yv .~•~{4n..: <r,::+~r..e~.rv . ;,as. 'ft. 'tl y- 71URN CI y0fDAMON, rEXAi MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE 0171 560•82CO October 9, 1985 Mr. Robert Rayner 700 Dallas Drive Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Gtr. Rayner: RE: ROAD IMS~ROVEM NTS t:OR RAYNER SUBDIVISION AND REPC.AT OF THE SUMMIT ADDITION Jerry Clark, City Engineer and the Planning and Development Department have reconsidered plane tot transportation factlitiee in the area of the above referenced plate. we are prepared to recommend the followlag to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council: 1. Johnson Street will be terminated and turned to the west to form a 9o-degree connection with Daugherty Street. Permanent curb must be installed at developers expense and plans for said curb are needed in conjunction with a final plat. 2. Dedication of 60 feet of right-of-way and engineering plans for the proposed new section of Johnson Street, extending south from Allegro Vista to I-35 (to be funded at developer's expense) must be approved before acceptance of a final plat and issuance of building permits. The objective of the above conditions is to restrict traffic to be generated by future development along Johnson Street, north of Allegro Vista. Please submit zovised preliminary plat information for both the Rayner Subdivision and Summit Addition replat contistent with recommended plans for transportation facilitlas. Letter+i of commitment from all property owners involved in Johnson Sheet right-ot-way dedication and road improvements is also needed before the Planning and Zoning Commission considers a t aff recommendation. v4 Me. Robect Rayner October 90 1995 Pape 2 Of course, the recommended method of planning roads in :hts area may not.meet with your satisfaction. or the ?Ianhinq and Zoning Commission may choose to not accept the staff proposal. Please notify us tmr.*diately if there ace any questions, problems, or concerns. A letter confirming your position on this matter would also be greatly appreciated before any further sition is scheduled or taken, Respectfully, 01 David Ellison Senior Planner jd cc: Jecry Clack 1044] ♦ . R. , STATE OF TEXAS ~ TO THE RONORASLt CITY COVOCIL: ' CITY OF DE:HTON ~ NHiREASY this the Texas Solquicantennial year has been set aside to celebrate 150 yews of haritepe and tradition; and, WIIEREA3, the Central Business District (that area of the City of Denton located within the boundaries of Carr~11 Boulevard, Parkway, Bell Avenua, and Sycamore Streets) was once: the soe},al 4nd ccmmareta' canter o Renton County; and, NHBRtA,S we,'the merchants and professionals who currently cgntlnue to serve the"people.of Denton from withiA this historic dis- trict, wish to commemorate the spirit and tradition apt its past; and, WHEREAS, since 1594, the "Court Square" &vea vi%3 'transform- ed each Saturday from the seat of county govt+rnment into the Social gathdring plaed for its citizens; THE'REF'ORE, we, the undersigned of the Central Business District, wish to pptition for the sxnctlon and support of the City C,3unoil of the City of Denton to close those streets comprising the "Courthouse Square" (100 Block of- North Elm, 100 Block of Nest Oak. 100 flock of North Locust, 100 Block of iJeai Hickory),♦ -14 the haddighdaugawk- Idi Ii low to 4I'l vehitulAr traffic frpm 6100 a.m.,until a109 p.j*. on SaturdayR iune21, 1956, in older 'to provide a Safe and histbri location for "COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY," a Sesquicentennial celebration of this tune- honored tradition of our city's past. NAME BUSINESS St.GANIZATION ADDRESS _...,../I r,MI4_y~'~.r ....Ar.w:»~+:..wf;.l.t f ~ _-~f- l~ii-.»~:•~ . ~ t ~~w" ~....yLr~Lia1..:L.C' '~'i...._i.t:-..- jjI t' ~ _'/`f#"`~'e'''" el) ow, t l .b f~`jfyrf ~4-~!"~,d~*L; t3 c> Gar' ~1!'~+~'` .r/' , t r \ 1 ~ rr.^' it a~ of. t ,PETITIO~ - "COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY" Page _ SAME RUSIN£SS/ORGANIZAT_ ION ADDRESS ~ 1. 16, A c' 7- ~ 7"-'- -41 L-I- r f - v Oct. AGO Ile 07701- keL' St. PETITXO~ '•COUNTY SEAT SATURDAY" Page BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION ADDRESS N _ ♦o _ ~ M sW1.s.wwY_Ywr.n./r.r y f ..._..w-.w..rwww-..wwr.....r.r».»~.«..~ .,..,.,.-._.-+r..__~...w...........w~,r.~w_rr....,... ........Yw...-...._._..ww~..' ------Y. w-_-- ww--_---.----_--- wwa.rlw -wrw- -rT._www Wrww___w_---------w-Ywww MwrY ---wYYM.NYUw.Yw.r~.w-ww-~. r-w.ww- ----•w+•----•"~MrY'r+ .~.rww~M-.w.~/.Vwr.-rrinrsww-MNw.r~ M~.rMMM4r-w~w1Y. wTr.-MYw wwwMr.w .N..,.-www ---w1Yw r.11M MY-.r -w w .w.YT r-ww_r. ..b.Www.rw.r---- ------r-Y.------YU - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --...--~.....»w.., - --r•.......Y+.I..-----.--- Ms~L.---------w- --a. -V.M.-r-w.Y^ sw.- ---------.r.~w..r.Mw Y. M•w.Y--w wr.rwwr.rww -_----------w~.-Y.WY.rr.~ •yw~rVMwrwwrY.--ww-----.rwrwsVYw!_w -•Y. YIY M~~ww1W-IMMW+w- r-w.r-.-r w...-M-•w.MM•-.-rr.www--• Y--wr+r.W w-rr.r.r-+snrw-s~~-rrr.F -.wYyw---------~- -ww_--w..r~.w---w-w.w--...--w ~.w..««-+....+*rr.w- -....+w....o.•i++r. r..... ...-.r-.r+. - - --w ...-w..-... r.ww.. r'.r...-.wr.r..w...wwr-..rr....w...r ~_.w.h-+wr. w...........-~.......rrwnw.rr+ -----.-.w .r..~wr.r.Lw«._......a.wr.r...._r-~-r.r..rw... w........rw.....+.»....w~---rr.._~.-...r-^-._..w.....~._ w-.ww.r..~.~-~r......w,...r.- e.._.wr.-,-.......-....«. ~.r.r.w....-.._...,.«»..+.+ «.....~+w..~..~r,r.r„.r..rww-....«.. ~.n_»~.---- r.......~..----- w-__.rY_--rw _ - .....~...e ..r.w....~......+_.....-.«.~..~wr.w. -......~rw.w...r-.r... r.-.r._w-r,+..-.....~~.... ...r..----- r-- po, February 21, 1986 Thq Greater Denton Arts Council respectfully requests the nontop city CounciI to great permission to close Hickory Street from the east old* of Bell Avenue to the east side of the Railroad tracks Saturday, June 21 from 10 A.M. to 0 P. M. and Sunday, June 22 from 10 A.M. to 7 P.M. We are requesting this in order to provide safety for vlaltors to our Sesquicentennial Arts and Crafts Fair. The Greater Denton Arts Council wl11 Join tho celebration of Texas first one hundred fifty years. "Texas Lagoa [*a" Is a project with many eomponenets end *soy diversified interests. The Council has planned a two-day arts fad crafts fair Saturday June 21 end Sunday June 22. Jolning the "Texas Legacies Fair" Is "County Seat Ss'urdey", a historical reflection coordinated by the Denton Courthouse Sgvsre Museum and the merchants on the Denton County Square. Fair- gaers can stroll down Hickory Street, through a sidewalk art show to enjoy both the events or utilize the shuttle but service. In the Center for the Visual Arts will be local oreftsmen ortlsts, an outstanding exhlbltlon of fine art, as well as lecture/demonstations. lhoro will be spinning, weaving, pottery, quilting and candle-making. Highlighting the oroft demonstrations will be two Indian craftswomen from the Alaboms- Couchatta tribe In Llvingston, Tx. Adel Williams and Rosa Thompson will make beadwork and long loaf pine needle baskets. There w111 also be refreshments su!;h as loxes berbequo and entertelnment by fiddlers and square dancers. The locsl quilters will display their handiwork from the 27 foot walls of Festival flail and stltch a friendship quilt with fairgoers names. The quilt will be preserved In the archives to display 150 years from now. As a proceeding and contlnuing part of the Sesquocontenalal extrevageiize, the Arts Council proudly presents the work of outstanding contemporary American artists who have lived and worked In Denton. Opening Juno 10 and closing July 10, works from O'Meii Ford, Carlotta Copren, gyorgy Kopes, Ccrlos Merlds, Octavlo Medellin, James Prestlnl, Rosalle Fulton, Mike Cunningham, Oemlon, and Martha Robbins will be among those on display. The Canter for the Visual Arts building Is a floio example of an adoptive use of an eosentielly utilitarian structure of the late 201s. The Arts Center opened In April of 1965. Formerly the building was a city warehouse end machine shop. Carefully renovated to refloat the original Industrial uwa and southwostorn facade style with its Spanish Colonial Revival doteleing, the renovation project was the first sanctioned by the Denton Sesqueoehtennial Comm Itteo. The property occupants In the 400 block of East Hickory includes: greeter Denton Arts Council Representetlval Mary L. Ohs*, Ex soutlve Director Steve's Barbarque Representative: S+0 4-1008i, O a Hsrpool Seed Inc. .llgpreseAtetly ~ tas/ofs i Preaf Y Tim HUDGENS FUNERAL NONE INC. sio w. Luc • wx !!t4 1NN M. TUU 7M 41n4 SU4171 h FES 2 0 M r February 18, 1986 affil -J j anfr, Mrs. Charlotte Allen 218 E. McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mrs. Allen: 1, Richard C. Burton, Sr., of the Denton Lion's Club hereby request td go before the City Council on March 4, 1986. Governor Mark White has proclaimed the month of March, Texas Lion's White Cane Month. We, as the Denton Lion's Club would like to do our part to help Denton partioipate in this statewide event. On Saturday, March 18, 1986 and Saturday March 22, 1986 from 10:00a.m, to 4:00p.m,, we would like to so"icate funds on the following corners: Carroll Blvd. and Uni- versity Dr,, and Carroll Blvd. and Eagle Dr, All monies collected from these two days will be donated to the Lion's Organ and Eye Bank of Texas. Thank you for your time and consideration with this matter. Sincerely yours, Q. l~tli~Otlr4[ err ~ lt Richard C. Burton, Sr. White Cane Days Committee "MCAUU PS CARS" DATE: 03/04/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT , t TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Sri PROM; Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: S-186 f RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of 8-186 with conditions at it's meeting of January 8, 1986 by a vote of 6 to 0. SUMMARY: A specific use permit is required for an antique and collectible shop according to the Zoning Ordinance. The property ie presently zoned neighborhood service. BACKGROUND: The property has been used for a grocery store and for a boot shop. The existing structure is less than 4,000 square feet in size and conforms to neighborhood service zoning. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fifteen (15) property owners within two hundred feet were notified. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to general fund can be determined at his time. Res fu =8ut:t:;e. / L o d Harrell Prepared by::n City Manager ck ~ d 1.1 lAh.aA\,-..II, Cecile Carson Urban Planner Appr ed; Jeff Meye Director of Planning and Development 0130e i PLAMING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNC I L To: Denton City Council Case No.: 5-186 Meeting Date: March 4, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Terry Walker 408 Santiago Place Denton, Texas 76201 Status of Applicant: Owner of Proposed Business Requested Action: A request for a specific use permit on property zoned neighborhood service. The specific use permit would allow the operation of an antique and collectible shop in a neighborhood service zoning district. Location and Size: The property is located at 1305 I-359 at the northwest corner of Knight Street and 1-35 and is approximately 0,316 acres, Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - I-35 South - Residential (8F-7) East - General Retail (OR) West - Residential (SF-7) Denton Development Guide: Low intensity Area SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: This property has frontage on Knight Street, a local street, and the Interstate 356 service road, a primary major arterial, One driveway will be allowed in addition to existing joint access. Spacings and clearances will be shown on site plan. Utilities: This site is served by adequate water and sewer facilities. All other utilities are available at the site. Drainage: Drainage concerns are minimal at this site. (Caste 5-286) Page Two ANALYSIS This tract is located in a low intensity area which is currently over the standard by approximately 78% based on existing zoning. The ;property was previously occupied by a retail boot store of less than 4,000 square feet which is permissible in a neighborhood service zoning district. Although the proposed use of an antique and collectible stole requires a specific use permit, there will be no resultant increase in intensity in the area. The proposed land use is consistent in nature with the previous uses and will be utilizing an existing structure. The existing lot does not conform to the access requirement of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. No curb exists on Knight Street and the access on 1-35 exceeds the width allowed in the Regulations. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of 5-186 at its January 8, 1986 meeting with the following conditions: 1. Development will be consistent with the approved site plan. 2. All existing curb cuts on 1-35 and Knight Street must be closed, One curb cut located a minimum of 40 feet from Knight Street on 1-35 shall be permitted, 3. Nine parking spaces are required for this specific use permit. 4. Parking along the south side of existing building adjacent to Knight attest will not be permitted. 5. No display or storage of merchandise will be permitted outside the structure. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Specific Use Permit Site Plan 3. Reply Form Totals 4. Mailing List 5. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of January 8, 1986. 111.9 s . I sots, it - ISO 332,II zr.r . b w F::2 6 at 9 Iwo 1501 3 10 s ~ M F180' ~ ~ r N in 4'L • 4 11 4 37y4 I, I rp, 1°Q rso' 3 _ O S W w 2.2 , 8 12 . m 1 err > N 2 1 1110, Id0' 2 x Y 2.3 IL 0 6 13 r 1 ~ 2.3 211 22 2.1 2 d ■/SKENLEE 7 14 Z1136 14.1 14,2 12 11.2 144' - - 'OOCRAZ 09 0 A- 996 f.r~/~ s1Mr+ N p~ Hie r nl I p ~ ,r A, N d C s.F. f Nom` ~ C 00 w ll, a 1L ..v J r11 of A T ~ Or~M V `rruCCO b ~ J 0 4L ~vOf z0 wf1: Af~f'i'•'~iw:/ ~l.l1' ti, li ~1 ii rip oiWM'R~ 11Mpt/' ! /Ite~'Yste LOAArielr lHlfe~lvrt 7YAfr 1*t t fblt 7Nr ANlfomr Mo9AA i.+.r r-xr-nreFN AV'~, ,r fl'.Nr s• SRC +lI.l1G PROPERTY OWJER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL S-186 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Josephine Abbott Thomason None Received 409 Marietta Denton, TX 76201 Mrs. Rylan B. Crabb 1608 Greenlee Denton, TX 76205 XAME ADDRESS L(0'CAT I ON Robert J. Caraway 500 E1 Paseo Denton 76205 A0996A E. Puchalski Tract 333A, 336-0, Ac. 0.487, 1/3771 J,W. Peckham Route 1, Box 317 1210 Knight Argyle, Tx. 76226 1216 Knight W-S Knight Leta Allis Roach 2319 Fowler Dr. Denton 76201 1220 Knight /Rylan B. Crabb 1608 Greenlee Denton, 76201 1608 Greenlee Dew Properties P.O. Box 594 Denton, 76201 1619 Underwood /Lela Ford 1203 Avenue C Denton, 76201 Chapman, Block 3, Lot S; 4/377 AMY Puchalski 94 Alvin Alien Owens 12107 Avenue C Denton, 76201 1207 Avenue C James A. Popejoy 1211 Ave C Denton, 76201 1211 Ave C "Ivey Ben Oil Co. Box 1469 Denton, Tx. 76201 1207 Knight Josephine P, Abbott 409 Marietta Denton, 76201 1506 Greenlee c/o Josephine A. Thomason also Wayne Abbott 1219 Knight :,)v o Ail) ..~u. James R. Hunter 41.5--Knight Denton, 76201 1215 Knight Carriage Square Assoc. 2001 Bryan Tower 30th Floor 903-1115 Av,a C c/o Henry S. Miller Co. Dallas, Tx. 75201 /Thelma Willingham 1200 Avenue C Denton, 76201 1200 Avenue C 1204 Avenue C /Spencer T. Washington 700 Park Lane Denton, 76201 1208 Avnnue C Harry T. Riney Denton, 76201 Chapman, Block 2, Lot 1 ~aX 41/y~ 11/3 98/JE Puchalski 9' P i Z Minutes January 8, 1986 Page 5 Intensity areas are primarily residential in nature and generally accommodate low density conventional single fam- ily housing. The fact that most duplexes or,/ similar to traditional single family housing in character and design is evidenced h/ many existing developments, She added that the separation of duplexes through platting for owner occupancy and individual sale of units is a popular trend. She said single family development has taken plate in the area and there appears to be no reason why single family developments cannot ultimately occur at this site. She said the zoning ordinance does permit residentir! planned developments on t:is size tract; therefore, specific con- ditions beyond standard zonin and subdivision requirements cannot be Imposed, Some development conditions may be de- sirable for the protection of adjacent single family dwell. In s. She said that duple;t development seldom impacts the existing character of single family areas negatively and the scale of this proposal Is limited; however, staff would Prefer a planned develo ment to insure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood and recommends denial of Z-1785. Mr. Juren asked if the property remains sintl• family would there still have to be 50 feet of right-of-way ded- icated for the development of the street. Ms, Spivey said yes. No. Brock asked when the new planned development ordinance would be In effect. Ms, Spivey sold that staff is working on it now and that it still need approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. She added that two months would be the shortest amount of time for completion. Ms. Brock asked if this property could accomodate more than five units. Ms. Spivey said that the property could accomodate sixteen units, REBUTTAL: Mr, Hopkins said that there would be no sore an live units on this property, He said that the du- plexes are nice and new and much larger than the old du- plexes in the area. He said that he didn't believe that it would change the character of the neighborhood. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Claiborne stated that he had severe reser- ve ons about straight two-fsaily zoning. He added that a planned development would probably have some merit. He said that the neighborhood should be commended on mixing the old with the new housing. Mr. Escue moved to recommend denial of Z-1785, Seconded by Ms, Cole, Ms, Brock stated that this is a very nice older neighbor- hood that has been maintained and now revitalized. Unanimously carried (6.0), C,r'S-186. Petition of Terry Walker, representing ifo5M Carnway, requesting a specific use permit on property presently zoned Neighborhood Service (NS). The property is Located at 1305 1.358 and shown in the B. Puchalskl Survey, Abstract 206. If approved, the specific use permit would allow the operation of an antique and collectible shop in a neighborhood service zoning eistrict. P 6 Z Minutes January 8, 1986 Page 6 Fifteen notices were mailed to property owners within 100 feet; seven reply forms were received in favor, one reply form was received in opposition. Pour reply forms were received in favor and three reply forms were received in opposition from persons not on mailing list. PETITIONER: Terry Walker, representing Robert Caraway, 'sI'a'f"e'd that they wish to operate an antique and collect- ible shop. He said that they rented the building in Sep- tember and were unaware that a permit was needed. He said the property was in terrible shape and they have spent a lot of time to cleaning it up. He said that they do not intend to have a flea market type operation or display or sell items outside the building. He saia that they have invited the surrounding neighborhood to come and visit and review their operating procedures. He said that he believed this store would be an asset to the neighbor- hood, He added that he has been involved in other busi~ nose in Denton as well as the Antique Mall which is under their operation. Mr. Claiborne asked about the type of antiques they would be selling, Mr. Walker said it would Le an array from glassware to furniture. He said that he refinishes furni- ture in his spare time as a hobby. Mr. Pearson asked if the/ would he renting space to deal- ers within the shop. Mr. Walker said yes to about 11 to 15 dealers. He rdded that it is set up as an open show- room and that the dealers pay a certain amount for their space. Mr. Pearson asked where the dealers come from. Mr. Walker said that most of them are locals who do this part time. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated this 0.4 acre tract is Toca e n a low intensity area which is currently over the standard by approximately 781 based on existing ton- ing. The property was previously occupied by a retail boot store of less than 4,000 square feet which is per- missible in a neighborhood service zoning district. She said although the proposed use of an antique and collect- ible store requires a specific use permit, there will be no resultant increase in intensity in the area. The pro- posed land use is cunsistent in nature with the previous one and will be utilizing an existing structure. The shape of the currently developed portion of the property makes total compliance with current city parking and ac- cess regulations impossible; howoverI some improvements can be made. She said the service road drive approach should be reduced to a maximum of 14 feet in width and the northern portion of the Knight Street entrance should also be closed in. Parking and access re ulations can be com- plied with if tho western half of th~s tract is developed. She added that since the proposed land use will not result in an increase in the areas intensity, staff recommends approval of S-186 with conditions. Ms. Cole asked about the sign. 1'4. Spivey stated that there is an existing one that is detached. She said that the Commission can require the removal of it. Mr. Pearson asked for the definition of antique and col- lectibles. Ms. Spivey said that there is no definition of collectibles. She said that the definition of antique is more than 100 years old. P R Z Minutes i January 8, 1986 Page 7 Ms, Brock asked if there was assurance if this was ap- proved that they would not sell items outside the building. Ms. Spivey said that the Commission could attach a condition to that effect. She added that the Commission could attach a time limit to the specific use permit and review it at the end of the time period. Ms. Brock stated that she was concerned about this area. REBUTTAL: Mr. Walker stated that the building was an eyesor5 to the community, He said that the neighbors welcomed the than a and added that they would not dis- play or sell anytting outside the building. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Juren moved to recommend approval of S-186 su ec -to•the following conditions: Development will be consistent with the approved planned development site plan. 2. All existing curb cuts shall be closed. One curb cut a minimum of 40 feet north of Kni/ht Street on 1-35 shall be permitted and must meet Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. 3. A paved parkin surface shall be constructed north of existing building. Nine (9) parking spaces are required for existing structure. Parking slon the south side of existing building adjacent to Kn ght Street will not be permitted, Seconded by Mr. Escue, Ms. Brock said that she would like to add a condition that states there will be no display or storage of mer- chandise outside the structure and so roved. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne. vo~e was called on amendment and unanimously carried (6-0). Vote was called on original motion with the amendment and unanimously carried (6-0), D. REQUEST OF PAUL WALKER AND DEWAYNS CHARLESTON, represent- ng• n to or ange, to designate oap 235 as Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive. Fifty-five notices were mailed to property owners on Loop 288; no reply forms were received in favor, one reply form was received in opposition. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that there are S2 busi- nesses at would be affected on Loop 288. She said that signs would have to be replaced on I-3S and Loop 288 with a cost t the City of approximately $1,000 to $29000 es- timated by Mr. Clark, She said that basically what was needed from the Commission was a recommendation. She added that staff has no recommendation aither way. PETITIONER: Dwayne Charleston, representing United for +tn$e, stated that they were dedicated to social improve- ments. He said that he believed the changing of Loop 288 to Martin Luther King, Jr, Drive would be an honor and tribute to Martin Luther King, Jr. Mr. Claiborne asked if they considered anr other streets. Mr. Charleston said that they considered Rickory Street because it flowed into the heart of the black community and tf: Historic Landmark Commission recommended Loop 1346L ! N0. AN ORDINANCE: GRA14TING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR AN ANTIQUE SHOP; PROVIDING FOR THE NEFERiNC NG OF SUCH USE ON THE ZONING i4AP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDI- NANCF. NO. AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO Ai'PAOXIMATELY 0.318 • ACKEl, OF LAND IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BEING LOCATED AT 1305 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35E, AS IS MORE PAdTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $1;000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AoD DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That the Zoning Classification and Use designation of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorpo- rated herein by reference, which is classified as a Neighborhood Service "NS" coning district wider the compreher.rive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby granted for the use of such property a specific use permit for an antique shop, subject to the fallowing conditions and restrictions: 1. The property shell be developed, used, operated, and maintained in conformity with the site plan shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. The existing vehicular parking area shall be expanded to provide a total of nine off-street parking spaces. Such expanded parking area and spaces shall conform to City standards. 3. All existing street access and curb cuts to the pro- party shall be clocad by constructing and installing curbs in conformity with City standards, except that one curb cut shall be allowed on the service road of Interstate HighwMy I-35 for access to the required Varking and a joint access curb cut shall be allowed along Knight Street for purposes of allowing trash ppickup, all as shown on the site plan attached hareto. In no case shall the area on the east side of the huilding, where access is allowed for trash pickup, be used as a parking area. 4. No merchandise shall be displayed or stored outside the building. 5. All signs, whether existing or proposed, shall be constructed, maintained and used in conformity with present sign regulations. SECTION II. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of Jsnuaryo 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Taxaa under ordinance No. 69.1, shall be referenced to show the property herein described being granted a specific use permit for the use approved herein. SECTION III. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby finds that such use is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promot'ng thn general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of Iand for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens, SECTION IV. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of s permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION V. That if an section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word Ln this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid byy any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affact the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION VI, That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice i- the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the C,ty of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986, VCMD , CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTi CMENTE ALLER0 CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: lMi.. 8.186/PAGE 2 rrmr , 4-:ry - ~ • EXHIBIT "A" • 1 FIELD NOTES ALL THAT CERTAIN 0,.310 ACRES TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE E.F'U.HIILSYI SURVEY A98TRACT NO.9969DENTON COUNTY,TEXASISAID TRACT BEING PART OF A CALLED 41,H441:19 ACRES TRACT SHOWN by DEED TO HT:NCRY C. SHANIIFELT AND RECORDED IN VOLUME PAGE FULtUW81 95 DEED RECORDS DENTUN COUNTY TEXAdjAND BEING MARE FULLY DESCRIBED AS PROINNING FOR THE SUUTWAST CORNER OF THE TRACT w iNG DESCRIBED HEREIN AT T11E NORTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT SHOWN BY DEED TO MARVIN JOMSIAND RECORDED IN VOLUME 907 FACIE 695 DEED RECORD89SAII1 CORNER BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF KNIGHT STREET. THKNCEtSOUTH 75 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 42.29 FEET TO AN IHUN PIN FOR CURNERI THkNCBtNORTH 61 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCtt OF 66.53 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOR CURWRt THENCEtNURTH 50 UEGREES 37 MINUTES 1"10 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 54.75 FEET TO AN FUINF FOR CORNERt rHENCEtNORTH 32 DEGREES 51 MINUIEU UI SECONDS EAsr A UISTANLE OF 106.96 FEET TU AN POINT IN THE SOUTHWEST RIGHT-UF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIUHWAY 3591 TIIFNrEtSOUTHEASTLY WI1H SAID RIGHT--W-WAY ANI) A f:URVE In THE RIGHT HAVING A kADIUS OF 1540.00 FEET 1CHORr SFARINU SUUrH US VESPEES U7 MINUTES (19 SECONDS E,ASr 106.0 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 106.0 FEET TO AN IRON PIN IN THE WEST LINE OF 1.NI3Hr STREETS IHFW,E1SOUTH 00 DEGREES 07 MINDrE8 40 SUCUNDS WkSI' WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID HIR&9T A DISTANC9 OF 54,23 FEET TO THE POINT OF Off INNING. 07 FEDM AY 19f41µ S-186 Z.y PUCHAI S Su 6 1 P~F N f p G,,,~ .n o 0 1 ci Go N ~e V a ~ 1. v 'e' fA ~y % y r !WC71 N, 5r V !icai~ ff~plpiIV ✓ 'f!. 14 0 f Y Fit owowni mss e* /ltlhrto cNAr/.w rs,r ~hA/eAwn trAlp ~I~tt b Tw'r ANri4tte• m.+er. ir~r r-x~-,+w►w s~nvfuv, rx isae' 5-1a4 sl~.jfG DATE: 3/4/86 CITY COUXIL R&PQ'AT FORMAT TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-1780 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commissio» recommended approval of Z-1780 at its meeting of February 12, 1986 by a vote of 6 to 0. SU MARX: The property is located south of U.B. Hwy 77 at its intersection with the proposed Loop 288. According to the Denton Development Guide the property is located in a high intensity area that encourages commercial, industrial, and high density residential development. MSKGROUND: The planned development would permit a number of lend uses to be shown on the comprehensive site plan, including office and general retail uses. PROGRAMS,r DEPAMENTB OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Seven (7) reply forms were mailed to property owners within two hundred feet. FISCAL IMPACTt No impact to general fund can be determined at this time. Resp c fully submit ed: L oy arrel Prepared by: City Manager Cecile Carson Urban Planner App ve Jeff Me Director of Planning and Development 1463a ~ 't7a~sr..~c2 .:ir ^rw-z^w+RVS+ ..,-~-r...q _ .s.-, ..sr PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Cabe No.: Z-1780 Meeting Date: March 4, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Rick Horn of PAWA - Winklemann & Associates, Inc. 12660 Cott Road, Suite 200 Dallas, TX 75251 Statue of Applicants Planner Requested Action: Change in zoning from the agricul- tural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classification Location and Size: A 25.6 acre tract on the south side of U.S. Highway 77 at its intersec- tion with proposed State Highway Loop 288 Surrounding Land Use and zoning: North - Vacant, agricultuaal= A South - Vacant, agricultu;,als A East - Vacantl A, LI West - Vacant, Union 76 Truck Stop= A, C Denton Development Guide: High Intensity Area SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: U.S. Highway 77 and Loop 288 are classified as primary major arterials. Minimum corner clearances and driveway spacing shall be consistent with the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. Deceleration lanes will be required for entrances to Tract 1 on Loop 288 and tract 2 on Loop 288 and highway 77. One entrance will be permitted for each frontage unless ~ ,7w, (Case Z-1780) Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) traffic studies justify more. Sixty (60) feet of right-of-way will be required for U.S. Highway 77. Utilities: No utilities are currently available to serve this tract. A 16" waterline is proposed along Loop 288 and will be built in conjunction with the Loop. Sanitary sewer service must be extended from a proposed sewer extension at a proposed development several thousand feet east of this development on U.S. Highway 77. A 20 foot easement will be needed on Loop 288 and Highway 77 frontages for utilities. Drainage: Upgrading of culvert under U.S. 77 and necessary grading or detention for whole tract for a 25 year storm will be required, The developer should coordinate with the State Highway Department on plans for the culvert under Highway 7. The devel- oper will have to fund drainage im- provements if development occurs be- fore the Loop is built. ANALYSIS This property is located in a high intensity area. According to the Denton Development Guide, the I-35 and North Loop 288 Center is to be balanced between commercial and industrial uses. At maximum development, the area is intended to provide over 300 acres of commercial and industrial development and 5 000 jobs in the area. Furthermore, little control of intensity Is proposed for these high intensity areas. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1780 with the following conditions at its meeting of pb!ruary 12, 1986: 1) A comprehensive Site plan must be submitted for each parcel before platting is approved. The site plan must show all (Case Z-1780) Page 3 RECOMMENDATION (Continued) development standards including but not limited to lot dimensions, lot coverage, building height, parking, setbacks, ingress and egress, buffering/,screening, and signs. 2) A tree preservation plan showing all existing trees, all trees to be removed, and a.li to be planted must be approved by the !Manning and Zoning Commission and City Council to conjunction with the comprehensive site plan. 3) A detailed landscaping plan showing 20% of total area landscaped must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in conjunction with the comprehensive site plan. 4) Sidewalks shall be located on the south and west sides of all dedicated public rights-of-way to be constructed with other public improvements. 5) The following land uses only may be submitted as proposed uses in the comprehensive plan, office, hotel, bank, movie theatre, gasoline service station, public or private park or open space, parking lot or garage, medical center or hospital, convenience store, and retail and shopping center uses. 6) Maximum ?,uilding height shall be five (5) stories. 7) Maximum lot coverage shall be 50% by buildings and 80% by buildings, drives, and parking lots. 8) Maximum square footage will be 11000,000 square feet. 9) Developer shall submit a detailed General Development Plan prior to any platting and after approval of comprehensive site plan by city council, ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. PD Concept Plan 3. Mailing List 4. Reply Forms Totals 5. Minutes of February 12, 1986, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 1176] d 1 SITE 0 ~ ti~ `a y ins UNIVERSITY .J m N 4 O 0 1 y M r ~ X11 LOCATION MAP i Mo . r i 1 ti. __-~'~►y/```` ''rte TIIAOT I YCI \ oso ^I • At I 000 loom tot 60 OOML r. w •A y 1XI t11ACT ! ~ ` Otto" / /~~^u w.MwIM rVR ryyryw w..w. p•.. r,.. •i w k~~ L 011 H Mtwims". 41ve•, Nt11M wwrr.•rr..w~u !S rUosoo .u or~r~•rr~uwr~• ,..wr.rrrss,q nw :.1N,'-00 lots, 111. w,nrr u.vrw w+r w., 1 It^r~n w,•..•^..w+'. .may w•.r r WY x r w, r, WISPS" 1111 ZewlAV r 6Mt . n. urn Tny M'w. V1 r.,r. rti y •1 Sit YSrr ~"e+*~.+rZ =,CFe'4,' r ~p _ « ie ..a-fi:• PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORM CITY COUN!.'IL Z-1,180 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Ruth G. Kellum None Received 2016 Georgetown Denton, TX 76201 Cauble Enterprises P.O. Box 1926 Denton, TX 76202 1 1 i 7 r lee r, 5 For Wis. ? ' - q mp T" -47 Minutes Planningg and Zoning Commission February 12, 1986 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zcling Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, February 12, 1986, at 5:00 p.m,, in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building. Present: Euline Brock, Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Esc~se, Jr., Gary Juren and Tom Pearson Absent: Keith Appleton Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey, Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; David Ham, Assistant Director of Utilities; Jerry Clark, City En inner; Martha Fuiauski, Administrative Intern; and Susan Mitchell, Secretary Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order. L CONSENT AGENDA: It was moved by Ms. Cole, seconded by s, roc , an3 unanimously carried (5-0) to approve the consent agenda as follows: A. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the 288 Center Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. B. Approval of preliminary and final plat of the Berg Addition., Lot 1, Block A C. Approval of final plat of the Edwards Addition, Lots 1-5, Block 1, D. Approval of final plat of the Infinity Strata Addition. E. Approval of preliminary and final plats of the Redmon II Addition. F. Approval of final plat of the Western Vintage Estates Addition, Lots 1-8, Block 1. Mr. Claiborne arrived at the meeting. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2-1780. Petition of Rich Horn, representing H. Ross Perot, Jr., requesting a change in zoning from the agri- cultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 25.6 acre tract located on the south side of U,S, Highway 77 at its intersection with proposed R State Highway Loop 288. The property is further described as a tract in the Nathan Wade Survey, Abstract 1407, If the request is approved, the following retail and office land uses will be permitted: office, hotel, bank, movie theatre, gasoline service station, public or private park or open space, parking lot or garage, medical center or hospital, convenience store, retail shops, and shopping center, Seven notice were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; four reply forms w6re received in favor and no reply forms were received in opposition. PETITIONER: Rick Horn of PAWA-Winkleman representing oss erot, Jr,, said that this is a request for a planned developpment for commercial uses. Re said that staff recommended five stories in height and 1,000,000 square feet in floor area. He said that he would like .+!''`"p' ,ns xy.¢a:~.p`i rnc' • q 1'.~ r rv r aye ♦ . _a vx+. i t P 3 2 Minutes February 120 1986 r Page 2 to have i.S million square feet, He said that this property will not be developed Ile the near £+ature because Mr. Perot wants to wait, IN FAVOR: None present: OPPOSED: None present. Bill Gates, 3321 Westgate, asked if moving the road north is fact or just a proposal. He said that he would prefer it as north as possible to keep the area low intensity close to Westgate Addition. Mr, Claiborne stated that the Commission has had a study session and suggested moving the line 1,000 feet north. He said that there is an 800 acre node and suggested it become a 1,200 acre node. He said the Commission is taking a look at this area and that there was a 601 possibility that it would be moved north. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that this property is coat- ` eed in -a high intensity area, According to the Denton Developpment Guide, the 1.35 and North Loop 288 Center Is to be balanced between com,ercial and indus- trial uses. At maximum developmenc, the area is in- tended to provide over 300 acres of commercial and in.. dustrial development and 51000 Jobs in the area. Fur- thermore, little control of Intensity is proposed for these high intensity areas. She said that the devel- oper will have to extend the waterline down Highway 77 from present water tower to their site. She said that there is a bottleneck In the northwestern section and that the developer will have to extend the sanitary sewer fron Hinkle and Greenbrier to their property. She said that staff recommends approval of 7-1780 with conditions. Mr. Claiborne asked how much square feet of floor area originally, Ms. Spivey said 3 million. Ms. Brock asked what standards were applied in regards to the number of floors. Ms. Spivey stated that staff felt that if there was residential abutin this property ten stories would be excessive, Ms. Brocf asked if it is possible to eliminate any of the uses permitted. Mr. Ellison said yes. REBUTTAL: Mr. Horn stated that thev could meet all requ rements but that they would request 1.5 million square feet of floor area. Mr. Claiborne asked if the 1.5 million square feet of floor area is feasible within the S story requirement. Mr. Horn said yes. Mr, Claiborne asked if they had any problems with the rest of the conditions. Mr. Horn said no. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Claiborne said that the intersection is eiTTFor what is proposed. Mr. Escuo stated that he objected to raising the square feet of floor area, Mr. Juren moved to recommend approval of Z•1780 with the following conditions: r .~rt r+ ~~'.P~.~'~~..t,~'~''` 4ur"~,~°.- 4~~`~~e t.. :,r y r:., ;ts,Kav a'.~~'_ =t ~ ~.ty P 8 Z minutes February 12, 1960 ' Page 3 1. A comprehensive site plan mudt,be submitted for each parcel before platting is approved. The site plan must show all development standards including but not limited to lot dimensions, lot coverage, build- ing height, parking, setbacks, ingress and egress, buffering/screening, and signs. 2. A tree preservation plan showing all existing trees, all trees to be removed, and all trees to be planted must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in conjunction with the comprehensive site plan. 3. A detailed landscaping plan showing 2011 of total area landscaped must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in conjunction with the comprehensive site plan, 4. Sidewalks shall be located on the south and west sides of all dedicated public rights-of-way to b9 constructed with other public improvements. 5. The following land uses only may be submitted as pro- posed uses in the comprehensive plan: office, hotel, bank, movie theatre, gasoline service station, public or privets park or pen space, parking lot or garage, medical center or hoospital, convenience store, and retail and shopping center uses. 6. Maximum building height shall be five (5) stories. 7. Maximum lot coverage shall be 504 by buildings and 80% by buildings, drives, and parking lots. 8, Maximum square footage will be 1,000,000 square feet. 9. Develop shall submit a detailed General Development Plan prior to any platting and after approval of. com- prehensive site plan by City Council, L5econded by Mr. Pearson and unanimously carried (6-0). B. Z-1783. Petition of Tim Horner requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the light industrial (LI) district on a 3.5 acre tract located on the south side of U.S. Highway 380 approximately 1,500 feet east of Masch Branch Road. The property is further described as a tract in the William Bryan Survey, Abstract 128. If the request is approved, the property may be util- ized for any use permit ed in the light industrial district by the City of Denton ning Ordinance. Four notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; No reply forms were received in favor or opposition. PETITIONER: Dixie Ladehoff representing Tim Horner, stated that industrial is the highest and best use for this property. She said that this land was once used for a livestock auction facility. She said that the property will probably be used to expand the applicants' manufactur- ing company because it has access to a major highway along, with major development. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey said that this site is located in the or zontal zone of the airport. The horizontal zone is defined in the Denton Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations as a horizontal surface 150 feet above the established airport elevation of 640 feet above mean sea level. The maximum building height on this site may not exceed an elevation of 790 feet above mean sea level. The site is located in the Composite Noise Rating (CNR) Zone I as defined by the FAA. The CNR is used to determine the extent and severity of noise impact. Gen- erally, the noise levels generated will interfere with certain activities and some land uses are not recommended ' for these areas, including churches, schools, and hospitals. ` - ?~.r V~+*R .'~`°,_c r DATE: 03/01/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT c~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-1783 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1783 by t vote of 6 to 0. SUMMARY: The property is located in a moderate intensity area that encourages residential and business development. The area should include diversified land uses and should not be specialized. BACKGROUND: The area is predominately vacant and used for agricultural purposes. The site is located in the horizontal zone of the airport and light industrial zoning would be an appropriate zoning in this area, PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Four (4) reply forms were mailed to property owners within two hundred feet. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the general fund can be determin at this time. Res ful Vurbed: Lloy Harrel Prepared by: City Manager U 1 L G-h+ Y~ r Cecile Carson Urban Planner App r% ve ft, Jeff Meyor Director of Planning and Development 0129e °.~e `e'°aaexs,~c?t K .vas '~Y~r~' ~w,., x Rr n5. r •s 'a^_ 'S ..:.n7b PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1783 Meeting Date: March 4, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Tim Horner 3101 Justin Road Lewisville, Texas 75028 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action: Change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the light industrial (LI) district. Location and Size: 3.5 acre tract located on the south side of U.S. Highway 380 approximately 1,500 feet east of March Branch Road. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Agricultural, residential; A South -r Agricultural, vacant; A East - Agricultural, vacant] LI, A West - Vacant, plumbing and mechani- cal contractor; LI, At GR Denton Development Guide: Moderate intensity area a SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: This tract has frontage on U.S. Highway 380, a primary major arterial. The developer should seek joint access with adjacent tracts. Driveways should have a large (50 foot) radius. A sidewalk will be required along Highway 380. Utilities: A 12" water line is located several hundred feet east of this site on Highway 380; however, it is doubtful that adequate fire protection can be secured from this line. A 10" sanitary sewer line is also located several hundred feet east of this development. i (case 2-1783) Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Drainage: The eastern 10 to 50 feet of this property is in the floodway and the remainder is in the floodplain. Considerable off-site improvements will be necessary as there are no existing channel improvements in the area. AIRPORT REGULATIONS The site is located in the horizontal zone of the airport. The horizontal zone is defined in the Denton Municipal Airport zoning Regulations ds a horizontal surface 150 feet above the established airport elevation of 640 feet above mean sea level. The maximum building height on this site may not exceed an elevation of 790 feet above mean sea level. The site is located in the Composite Noise Rating (CNR) Zone I as defined by the FAA, The CNR is used to determine the extent and severity of noise impact. Generally, the noise levels generated will interfere with certain activities and some land uses are not recommended for these areas, including churches, schools, and hospitals. ANALYSIS The property is located in a moderate intensity area. These areas encourage commercial and related activities along the freeways and primary arterials however, these areas should develop in a manner to avoid creation of unsightly and inefficient strip-type commercial areas. Moderate intensity areas also encourage diversity and a mixture of land uses and should not be specialized, such as all commercial. This area includes a mixture of land uses but is predominately vacsnt and agricultural. RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of z-1783 at its meeting of February 12, 1986 by a vote of 6 to 0. I (Case Z-1783) Page 3 ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Reply Form Totals 3. Mailing List 4. Minutes of the February 12, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 013le - Me Not f Rd. Rd d01' • R OGO son La no ISM `Font o Mouth r ;r a Un r~ro _ x p n:` • t ~o t , o of v+ 0 ; , ' .w. rr almm, I C "~•1 ~A: IMF. A♦. • , r ~ , ~ ...0~ r., r; b :i :'s a '~Y rri,, a': g=s pSn ;'STe ir+,F° a i,. xr~enj X44 -_e^ES.~`.`;: PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CI'T'Y COUNCIL Z-1783 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received r~ . ~ r2H• ; i~ . .-;~;A'.C:`tt mf , r . r : , a ~ S.; ~~i Y. .--Fr.~'. 7-, S,3 oiAL Vic 65 A -1 let m Ask p 4 Z Minutes February 12, 1980 ' Page 3 A comprehensive site plan must,be submitted for each parcel before platting is approved, The site plan must show all development standards including but not limited to lot dimensions, to. covera e, build- ing height, parking, setbacks, ingress and egress, buffering/screening, and signs, 2. A tree preservation plan showing all existing trees, all trees to be removed, and all trees to be planted must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in conjunction with the comprehensive site plan. 3. A detailed landscaping plan showing 201 of total area landscaped must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in conjunction with the comprehensive site plan. 4. Sidewalks shall be located on the south and west sides of all dedicated public rights-of-way to be constructed with other public improvements, S. The following land uses only may be submitted as pro- posed uses in the comprehensive plan; office, hotel, bank, movie theatre, gasoline service station, public or private park or open space, parking lot or garage, medical center or hospital, convenience store, and retail and shopping center uses. 6. Maximum building height shall be five (5) stories. 7. Maximum lot coverage shall be 501 by buildings and 801 by buildings, drives and parting lets. 8. Maximum square footage will be 1,000,000 square feet. 9. Develop shalt submit a detailed General Development Plan prior to any platting and after approval of com- prehensive site plan by City Council. Seconded by Mr. Pearson and unanimously carried (6-0), B.~ 1783. Petition of Tim Horner requesting a change in F+ zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the ~ light industrial (LI) district on a 3.5 acre tract located on the south side of L'.S. ilighway 380 approximately 1,500 feet east of Masch Branch Road. The property is further described as a tract +.n the William Bryan Survey, Abstract 1.28. If the request is approved, the property may be util- ized for any use permitted in the light industrial district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. Four notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; No reply forms were received in favor or opposition. PETITIONER: Dixie Ladehoff representing Tim Horner, stated that lig-Tt industrial is the highest and best use for this property. She said that this land was once used for a livestock auction facility. She said that the property will probably be used to expand the applicants' manufactur- ing company because it has access to a major highway along with major development. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey said that this site is located in the horizontal zone of the airport. The horizontal zone is defined in the Denton Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations as a horizontal surface 150 feet above the established airport elevation of 640 feet above mean sea level. The maximum building height on this site may not exceed an elevation of 790 feet above mean sea level. The site is located in the Composite Noise Rating (CNR) Zone I as defined by the FAA. The CNR is used to determine the eytent and severity of noise impact. Gen- erall), the noire levels generated will interfere with certain activities and sme land goes are not recossaended for these mseas, includins ebu-tches, Schools, end hospitals. P 6 Z Minutes February 12, 1986 Page 4 The property is located in a moderate intensity area. These areas encourage commercial efd related activities in nodes along the freeways and primary arterials; how- ever, these areas should develop in a manner to avoid creation of unsightly and inefficient strip-type commer- cial areas. Moderate intensity areas also encourage diversity and a mixture of land uses and should not be specialized, such as all commercial. This area includes a mixture of land uses but is predominately vacant and agricultural. She said that the moderate intensity is not exceeded. She said that the property on both sides is light induBtrial and that it is too small for a planned development. She said that booster pumps are in the final stages at McKenna Park so adequate fire protection t-tan be provided, She said thct staff recom- mends approval of Z-1783, REBUTTAL: None offered, Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION; Mr, Escue moved to recommend approval of T" M-. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried 1(6-0). C. Z-1788. Petition of Stephen De- Jardins, representing fFe ames M. Brown Company, requ.3tingg a chaa in zoning from the agricultural (A) ciassificgtion to the planned development (PD) district on a 74.9. ecre tract located at the northeast corner of the interstate Highway 35N service road and Payne Drive. The property is further described as a tract in the Francis Batson Surv6y, Ab- stract 43. The following land uses are proposed for the development; Office - 16,75 acres Neighborhood Service - 4,00 acres Cluster Housing - 219 units on 18.34 acres with a density of 11,9 units per acre single Family - 91 units on minimum 10,000 squaw., foot lots on 27.74 acres with a density of 3,3 units per acre Single Family - 11 units on minimurn 16,000 square foot lots on 6 acres with a density of 1.9 units per acre Park - 2.17 acres Twelve notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; four reply forms vrere received in favor, no reply forms wise received in opposition, PETITIONER; Stephen Des Jardins, representing James Al. grown Zompany, stated there had been a few changes from the original plan to address the concerns of the neigh- bors. He added that most of them were in agreement with the plan now. Roger Barrett, Metroplex Engineering Corporation, stated that this request is a mixed use development, ke said that they had worked with the neighbors, He said that there is adequate access to each parcel, He said that each parcel is individual of the other and this gives the development a community within a community concept. He said that they have address the public scfety issue with the extension of Payne Drive. He said that there will be improvements to the sanitary sewer and that the developer is aware of the infrastructure improvements. He said that there is 9.9S acres dedicated to amenities and open space and that it makes up 13,271 of the devel- opaent. He added that it is a very likable concept and coaparable to Greenway Club Estates to the south. Mr. Claiborne asked if the proposed access is private. i'vir:.+g?h(ly p°'4sr s'F svrr.YF~«7{~Yn:f-''+.+ei Tf°'-'S--w'' ^e#'a; .wv: 00. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THB CITY OF DV1TON TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE N0. 69-1, • A14D AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO A4R6XIMATET.Y 3.5 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE WILLIAM BRYAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 148, UENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U. S. HIGHWAY 380 APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FRET EAST OF MASCH BRANCH ROAD, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USL DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL "LI" CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPER'T'Y; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $1,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVE,RABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Classification and Use designation ap;?icable to all or part of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference harsin, is hereby changed from Agricultur~ A District Classification and Use to Light Industrial "LI District Classification and Use under the Aomprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-11 be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. SECTION III. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximuw benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens, SECTION IV. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requireeents thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor yunishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION V._ That if an section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause„ phrase or word in this ordi:ance, or application thereof to an;, . person or circumstance is held invalid b any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby deciaros it would have enacted such remaining porticna despite any such invalidity. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of ,)enton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1486. RICHARD 0. 3"MMAKT, KAYM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON,pTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: 4 YY1 Irv," Z-1183/TIN HOMU/PAGE 2 -wpsi.. -,~2"+'¢,~•,C°,•~`s'~'"' the^.:.'1't Sr.'fE'rs~~'ar. 7'+',x-:-w -~,v r ~'~R EXHIBIT "A" All that certain 3.5 acre lot, tract or parcel of 1&nd situated in the William Bryan Survey, Abstract No. 148, Denton County, Texas and being part of a tract described in adeed from John Latham to Mildred Knight recorded in Volume 1025, page 293 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as followss Beginning at a 112 inch square iron pin set in the South right of way of U.S. Highway No. 380 at a point South 88 degrees 33 minutes east 418.72 feet from the northwest corner of said Knight tract; Thence South 88 degrees 33 minutes east with the south right of way of Highway 380 a distance of 302.7 feet to a 112 inch square iron pin set at the northwest corner of a 1.53 acre tract; Thence South 0 degrees 46 minutes 20 seconds east with the west line of said 1.53 acre tract a distance of 502.67 feet to a 1/2 inch Pquare iron pin set at the southwest corner of said 1.53 acre tract; Thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 10 seconds west with the south line of said Knight tract a distance of 300.66 feet to a 1/2 inch square iron pin set at the sout!%east corner of a 4.96 acre tract; Thence North 0 degrees 59 minutes 0 seconds west with the east line of said 4,96 acre tract a distance of 508.63 feet to the point of beginning. i Z-1783/TIt2 HORYJER/PAGE 3 DMf 03/0#/" C=I 2MUA MM MMAT Oz/ 1~../ 'P0. ldsyor and ltiembers of the City Council !M. Lloyd Harrell, City yanager SUDJRCT: 2-1788 RtCQMgjWIQ*: The Planning and Zoning Comadsaion considered this item at its meeting of robruary 12, 1986. No reooamendation was made because of a 3 to 3 tie vote. This site is located in a low intensity area. Those areas are considered the pcis ary residential areal, in the City. The Development Guide polinies for these areas include limiting the area to q acres of nonresidential use separated by a 1/2 silo, limiting apartomts to 200 units separated by a 1/2 mile, offering diversified housing, and requiring strict site design to i.n.ure neighborhood preservation. MMROM : Thk Planning and Zoning Comission has recoamnded denial of two precious requests on this tract in May, 1985, and in August, 1985, atGiing that the proposals im luded an "over allocation of high intensity uses." PROGM, DgPA[t'l M OR GROUPS A IPICT:D: Twelve (12) notices were mailed to property owners within two hundred feet. LUScA. -PACT : No impact to general fund can be determined at his time. Res fully sub ted: yd I1 City !tanager Prepared by : C-I b k~ n Cecile Carson Urban Planner J1FD Jeff Pwr Director of Plan.:.- amd *~relopseent OMW r s : s,.. rw ~x s ;.x 4"•'. f-• . r x.aYfz ` t, Y• m ~ . x - . PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: 2-1788 Meeting Date: March 4, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Stephen Des Jardine representing the James M. Brown Company 823 Douglas Avenue, Suite 1204 Dallas, TX 75225 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action: Change in zoning from the agricultur- al (A) district to the planned devel- opment (PD) classification for the following land uses: Office - 16.75 acres Neighborhood Service - 4 acres Cluster Housing - 219 units on 18.34 acres with a density of 11.9 units per acre Single Family - 91 units on minimum 10,000 square toot lots on 27.74 acres with a density of 3.3 units per acre Single Family - 11 units on minimum 16,000 square foot lots on 6 acres with a density of 1.9 units per acre Park - 2,17 acres Location and Size: A 74.97 acre tract located at the northeast corner of the Interstate Highway 35N service road and Payne Drive Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Residential, Agricultural; (SF-16), (A) South - Residential, Agricultural; (SF-7), (SF-10), (A) East - Vacantt (SF-7), (SF-10) West - I-35N Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity [ F r Wit; : ri~q rt s;;`c+~xre ,^p%RT:2.'M+tr Ts~, .*nTR ~asqai a v ^ aaa, v -'a e R~ 'y: s.^(Case Z-1788) Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation Payne Drive is a secondary major arte- rial requiring 80 feet of right-of-way and a 4 lane divided section. Westgate Drive is A collector street requiring 60 feet of right-of-way with a 41 f6ot street section. Perimeter street paving regulations are applicable to Payne and Westgate Drives. Offsite paving will be necessary from this tract to the intersection of Payne and Westgate. Number and location of driveways will be determined at the time of platting and will comply with the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. Sidewalks will be required on the south and west sides of all streets in the development. Utilities: Developer must extend a 16" waterline from University Drive along Bonnie Brae to property. The nearest sani- tary sewer is several thousand feet east of this project at Bonnie Brae and Payne Drive. Developer must extend the line across the frontage of this property. Electric, gas, and telephone service is available to the site. A 20 foot utility easement will be required along I-35. Drainage: Major drainage systems from the west and north will be needed. These are not addrei!sed on the site plan and will affect lot .layout. The private park area will also serve as a detention area. HISTORY The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended denial of a planned development on this tract at its May 22, 1985 meeting. The petition by the James M. Brown Company included the following land uses: Y,,; y • .v+° - 1 3;' (Case Z-1788) Page 3 HISTORY (Continued) General Retail - 18.9 acres Office - 12.3 acres Multi-Family - 20.0 acres Townhouses - S.8 acres Single Family - 16.0 acres The Commission stated that the proposal included an "overallo- cation of high intensity uses" and would cause "detrimental effects an adjacent property," The Commission also commented that the proposed zoning was inconsistent with the surrounding established neighborhoods. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of a planned development on this tract at its August 28, 1985 meeting. The petition by the James M. Brown Company included the following land uses: Office - 21.86 acres Townhouses - 21 acres (11 units per acre) Single Family - 28 acres (2.36 units per acre) Neighborhood Service - 4 acres The Commission stated again that the proposal contained too much office zoning and that additional single family and open space should be provided. A petition of the James M. Brown Company on a 239 acre tract east and northeast of this site was unanimously denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission at its July 10, 1985 meeting. The proposed planned development included commercial, light industrial, and residential zoning. The Commission concluded that the zoning was not compatible with the surrounding zoning and land uses in the area. ANALYSIS This area is residential in nature. The property north and south of this site is single family. The property to the east and southeast is zoned single family. This site is located in a low intensity area. According to the Denton Development Guide, low intensity areas should be reserved as our primary housing areas. Therefore, these areas should emphasize residential uses. The intensity area is under the intensity standard based on existing land use. The intensity study area consists of 491 (Case z-176b) Bags 4 LNALYSIS (Continued) acres of which 436 acres is presently zoned agricultural (A). This proposed development would generate over 13,000 trips per day with 360 acres still zoned agricultural. This 75 acrer proposed development represents 158 of the land in the area, but would generate 358 of the intensity standard. If the planned 11 development is approved, the remaining 360 acres would have to be zoned single family (SP-10) or higher not to exceed the intensity standard. As stated in an earlier section of this report the Planning and zoning commission felt that the non-residentiai uses on the tract were too excessive. The previous proposal included 26 acres of non-residential zoning or 358 of the planned development. In comparison, this proposal includes 20.75 acres of office and neighborhood service zoning or 288 for non-residential purposes. The Denton Development Guide states that office, commercial, retail and other non-residential uses should be limited to four (4) acres in a low intensity area and concentrations should be separated by 1/2 mile. Approximately six acres of multi-family and neighborhood sezviee zoning (offices) is located less than 1/2 mile to the south of this tract. The approval of an additional 21 acres of office/neighborhood service zoning will violate this policy. This proposal maintains the amount of single family (SP-10) zoning (28.0) acres in the last proposal. The townhouse tract on the previous submittal has been replaced with a cluster housing tract of 18.34 acres with a density of 11,94 units per acre and includes 6 acres of single family (SP-16) zoning. Strip commercialization of thoroughfares is strongly discouraged and the concentration of office and neighborhood service on I-35 could, in effect, create strip commercial zoning on the 1-35 service road. The Development Guide encourages diversified housing in Denton, but the developments should be well planned to insure that neighborhood integrity is maintained. The Guide suggests that no type of housing should be overly concentrated in an area and good site design transition between housing should be used, including greenbelts and intensity gradation. The existing zoning and development along I-35 is extremely diverse. Several single family neighborhoods, including southridge, Brier Cliff and Greenway Club Estates, abut the service road. The buffers along I-35 vary from office to duplex to fourplex to no buffer, that buffer being a side yard or rear yard of a single family house. In addition, apartment complexes along 1-35 have been constructed in the past twelve to twenty-four months, including Pace's Crossing (under construc- tion at Loop 288), woodhill (Teasley Lane) and Londonderry Village (Sam Bass Boulevard). 777 177777777 77" ,y art~R'asn', .,.3-..f 'c-.: ;v!.~ _C Y.. .n .v -._r. .-;~..,~,va .~rr.w~^tr.'u^w~.s.,yrya. •;~~.._r~w..v-~.. (Case Z-1788) Page 5 F.?lALYSIS (Continued) Staff recommended denial of this pro osal because of violation of the Development Guide policies. ~anton is experiencing a large vacancy rate in office space, according co the Denton Chamber of Commerce, but a need for townhomes. condominiums and apartments does exist according to MIFF Market rcesearch, Inc. The staff has recommended that other residential uses be located abutting I-35 with a buffering by gradation and zoning to the single family-16 to single family-10 on Westgate. RECOMMENDATION I The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its meeting of February 12, 1986. A motion to approve the request subject to the conditions listed below fatle,~ by a vote of 3-3. A subsequent motion to deny the req,Eest alsi failed by a vote of 3-3. 1. A comprehensive site plan must be approved by the Ylunning and Zoning Commission and City Council. 2. The cluster housing area is limited to eleven (11) units per acre with a maximum height of two stories. All other devolopment standards (setback, lot size, etc.) shall be consistent with the multi-family restricted (MF-R) zoning in the Denton Zoning Ordinance. 3. The neighborhood service, zoning shall be consistent with permitted uses in the Denton Zoning Ordinance. 4. The singly family (SF-1)) zoning shall be consistent with development standards (setbacks, lot size, etc.) in the Denton Zoning Ordinance. 5. The officc zoning shall be consistent with development standards (setbacks, list size, etc.) in the Denton Zoning Ordinance. The maximu,.t height for the structures in the office zoning shall be three (3) stories and other details must be shown on the comprehensive site plan. 6. 4 solid six (6) foot masonry and living fence shall be constructed along Lhe southern boundary of this tract, along the north and east boundaries of the neighborhood service area; along the north and east boundaries of the office area; along the north, east, and south boundaries of cluster area. 7. A landscape plan must be approved for the office, neighborhood service anA cluster areas befr.:e building permits shall be issued. 8. Access shall be shown on the comprehensive site plan. a i k- ;QP (Case $-1788) Page 6 RECOMMENDATION (Continued) 9. Sidewalks shall be located throughout the development on one side of all streets (south an-1 west sides). ALTERNA'T'IVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. PD Concept Plan 3. Reply Form Totals 4. Mailing List 5, Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of February 12, 1986 1446a ~w A ' E ~ S - 1 39 A i II i SF- SF-7 r .a ~~1Y MAY Y~ ~ rl rf.r! E L 1 A I „ I p PD- 86 ~ w r 1~ r r r 1. ~r PO-13 r E 11.1&,111_1 2- 6 x. ~ aa~tF 4., wrtta r ,►ooma+ f , 7IW .`1 OVA ; ~'•7; ~t' 7 :.Y t PAA 3 i R DEVELOPMENT PLAN JA MR M. ERCi AfM CM MUT$tcwmLux X78$ ,on cmAmncm „ate Koo VVCNTH C VG an owvrt*4 w 1 mm ~ao•rMa ~ a-~s-aa loo vtxmts E1/iEIVF:~i .,`c `'a. '-•a g'.fl'}„ 1'M1.z4~~.; .3 Jiw,. s. yy3. ,?JI.. mss _S% j v ~,°?-a °•v~s.'k ai*fae -~3,q•.A~ ,.-THSw',r:P~4C'is~';rsmyr fi.r~..a"se~- s°vm.•wts ra_j'ry n ~ - • ~jp PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1788 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Masterex, Inc. None Received 13601 Preston,Suite 709 Dallas, TX 75240 Carlo J. Farina, Jr. 5201 N. O'Connor Blvd Suite 360 Irving, TX 75039 Archie C. Payne 2603 Robinwood Denton, TX 76201 Cauble Enterprises P.O. Box 1926 Denton, TX 76202 i rY yS . ~,+sny~.«r:+^i-r .yq~r ; ..`~P .'"?•~'eF ~.:n ~'v~a;':: ~'r„~r`w;x ~="ST.. a+%`~ f Q Q .r...rr 7V 0. yo 00 Ito r T, r..~.+ -ODLe SIC A 1 ~r 000 -&A L Alin 0 (IVA , /3 G o Qla lei Lk Z5 e -o~ as 403r Nooz&. /Are Q~ now_ P 6 Z minutes February 12, 1086 Page 4 The property is located in a moderate intensity area. These areas encourags commercial afid related activities in nodes along the freeways and primary arterials; how. ever, these areas should develop in a manner to avoid creation of unsightly and inefficient strip-type commer- cial areas. Moderate intensity areas also encourage diversity and a mixture of land uses and should not be specialized, such as all commercial. This area includes a mixture of land uses but is predominately vacant and agricultural. She said that the moderate intensity is not exceeded. She said that the property on both sides is light industrial and that it is too small for a planned development. She said that booster pumps are in the final stages at McKenna Park to adequate fire protection can be provided, She said that staff recom- mends approval of 1-1783. REBUTTAL; None offered, Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Escue moved to recommend approval of Z-1783Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0). C. Z-1788, Petition of Stephen Des Jardins, representing R-e-James M. Brown Company, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) district on a 74.97 acre tract located at the northeast corner of the Interstate Highway 35N service road and Payne Drive. The property is further described as a tract in the Francis Batson Survey, Ab- stract 43. The following land uses are proposed for the development: Office - 16.75 acres Neighborhood Service - 4,00 acres Cluster Housing - 219 units on 18.34 acres with a density of 11,9 units per acre Single Family - 91 units on minimum 10,000 square foot lots on 27,74 acres with a density of 3,3 units per acre Single Family - it units on minimum 16,000 square foot lots on 6 acres with a density of 1.9 units per acre Park - 2,17 acres Twelve notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; four reply forms were received in favor, no reply forms were received in opposition. PETITIONER: Stephen Des Jardins, representing James M. rown ompany, stated there had been a few changes from the original plan to address the concerns of the neigh- bors. He added that most of them were in agreement with tho plan now, Roger Barrett, Metroplex Engineering Corporation, stated that this request is a mixed use development. He said that they had worked with the neighbors. He said that there is adequate access to each parcel, He said that each parcel is individual of the other and this gives the development a community within a community concept. He said that they have address the public safety issue with the extension of Payne Drive, He said that there will be improvements to the sanitary sewer and that the developer is oware of the infrastructure improvements. He said that there is 0.05 acres dedicated to amenities and open space and that it makes up 13,271 of the devel- opment. He added that it is a very likable concept and comparable to Creenway Club Estates to the south. Mr. Claiborne asked if the proposed access is private. w(# 1's~., rit..`A 3rcy es.`wR. V ^'t'-+R,.tN: r c.. kA . k: 7 etl P Q Z' Minutes Februa, y 12, 1986 , Page 5 Mr, Barrett said yes. Ms. Brock asked how much of the park area is in the flood. plain. Mr. Barrett said most of it and it will also be used as a detention area. IN FAVOR: Ray Wilson, 3106 Darby Lore in the Westgate Ait=on, stated that the petitioner and neighbors had come to an agreement. He said that he liked the fact that they will be taking the trafi'_c off Westgate and putting it on P erne Drive. Mr. Claiborne asked if the office and commercial uses would be a negative affect on Westgate Addition. Mr. Wilson said that there were a lot of changes in the meetings they had with the petitioner. Ile said that they now have SP . 16 homes abusing up to their homes for protection, Bill Travis 3111 Darby Lane, stated that he was in agreement with commercial uses and the buffer of their homes OPPOSED. J. V. Smallwood, 2709 Brookhollow of the red` a way Club Estates, stated that he was not consulted on the plan, He said that he was not opposed to devel- opment but an advocate of planning, fie said that this plan does not coincide between No residential areas. He said that a precedent will be set if this is approved. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey explained briefly the history o`fthis t'rect. She said that this area is residential in nature and the property to the north, south, east, and southeast is either s9.ngle family or zoned single family, The site is located in a low intensity area designated byy the Development Guide to be reserved as our primary housin areas. The intensity area is under the intensity standard based on existing land use. The intensity study area consists of 491 acres of which 436 acres is presently zoned agricultural (A). This proposed development would generate over 12,000 trips per day with 360 acres still zoned agricultural. This 7S acres pro- posed develpment represents 1S4 of the land in the area, but would generate 364 of the intensity standard. If 0e planned development is approved, the remaining 360 acres would have to be zoned single family (SF-10) or higher to not exceed the intensity standard, the previous propo- sal included 26 acres of non-residential zoning or 354 of the planned development. In comparison, this proposal includes 20.75 acres of office and neighborhood service zoning or 284 for non-residential purposes, This proposal violates the office, commercial, and retail concentration policy in a low intensity area. The Development Guide also discourages strip commericalizaticn in low intensity areas. Staff recommends denial and if the Planning and Zoning Commission is inclined to recommend approval, conditions are recommended by staff. Mr. Pearson asked if the staff had any data on what happens when a park area is used as a detention pond. Ms Spivey said no. She said that they are acconodating their needs on their tract and the City has no desire to maintain the ppark area, Mr. Pearson asked who would maintain this area. Mr. i:lark stated that if it is dedicated as a drainage ease- ment, tiion it becomes the city's responsibility. RBT,IUT„TAL: Mr. De Jardin stated that he recommended light ,n us r al uses in this area. He said that residentisl uses were not appropriate up against 1-35. He said that he has no prcbleams with ary of the conditions. He said that the office site is not out of line with the residen- tial in that it will be three stories with a brick resi- V .,e? _ a~ f h#., rA: r r.•~; P 6 Z Minutes February 12, 1986 ' Page 6 dential type roof, He added that they share the city's problem with the detention area and are open to sugges• tions. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Claiborne that this particular plan is an mpI~rvement and each plan is better than the other. He said that the develoPcr has addressed the neighbors con- cerns and worked with them. He added that he could live with this plan, Mr, Escue stated that they needed to lower intensity. Ms, Brock stated that she would like to see the cluster area as duplex and the office area as cluster. She said that multi-family is more reasonable on the inter- state than SF-10 or SP-16, Mr. Pearson stated that this is a very agreeable plan. Mr. Pearson moved to recommend approval of Z-1788 with the following conditions: 1. A compprehenst, ~ site plan showing development standards must bri approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council prior to platting. 2, 1%. cluster housing area is limited to eleven (11) units ger acre with a maximum height of two stories. All other development standards (setback, lot size, .etc.) shall be consistent with the multi-family re- stricted (Ml--R) zoning in the Denton Zoning Ordinance. 3. The neighborhood service zoning shall be consistent with those uses permitted in neighborhood service zon- ing district in the Denton Zoning Ordinance. 4. The single family (SP-10) zoning shall be consistent with development standards (setbacks, lot size, etc.) for SP-10 zoning district in the Denton Zoning Ordinance. S. The office zoning :ahll be consistent with development standards (setbacks, lot size, etc.) for office zoning district in the Denton Zoning Ordinance except the max- imum height for the structures shall be three (3) stories. 6. A solid six (6) foot masonry and living fence shall be constructed along the north, east and south boundaries of the neighborhood service area; along the north and east boundaries of the office area; along the north, east, and south baoundnries of cluster area. The fence along the eastern boundary of the cluster housing must be constructed before any building permits are issued in the cluster housingy areas, All other fences must be con- structed prior to 4ssuanco of certificate of occupancy or utility connection permitted. 7. A landscaping plan showing a minimum 201 ianlsca ing must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council with the comprehensive site plan. 8. Access shall be shown on the comprehensive site plan. 9. Sidewalks shall be located throughout the development on one side of all streets (south and west sides) in con- junction with other public improvements. 10. Offsite improvements on Payne and Westgate Streets must be constructed in conjunction w1th other public improve- ments. It. Developer shall submit a detailed General Development Plan prior to any platting and after approval of comprehensive Bite plan by City Council. 12. Compreheaaive site plan for SF-10 and SF-16 shall be de igned to accommodate the location of existing water, sewer or utility lines and easements. Seconded by Mr. Juren. y- P 6 Z Minutes February 12, 1996 Page 7 Vote was called: Aye - Claiborne, Juren, Pearson ' Nay - Brock, Cole, Escue Motion failed (3-3). Mr. Escue moved to recommend denial of Z-1788. Seconded by Ms. Brock. Vote was called: Aye - Brock, Cole, Escue Nay - Claiborne Juren, Pearson Motion failed (1-3), Mr. Claiborne stated that Z-1788 would be forwarded to City Council with no recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. i 'e v 777, DATts 03/04/66 CITY, MG1h UM lO1MAT / eo T0: Mst►ar and Kembers of the City Council • : Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUWRCT: HOLD A PUBLIC HRARINQ CONCRRNINO THR PROPOSRD ANNRXATION OF 125.5255 ACM LOCATRD AT UNGS ROW An PROPoen LOOP 288, sou" Or OAK am MATRS, AND SOUTH Or SILVXRDOMC ROAD. (A-33) RZOMMATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its meeting of February 12, 1986. This is primarily a voluntary request for annexation submitted by Teasley Road Associates. A 14.5 acre portion of the area between proposed Loop 288 and the existing city limits anu Kingston Trace Subdivision is involuntary. Teasley Road Associates is requesting annexation for zoninj and delivery of City services. The current conceptual land use plan shows 128 lots of tiingle family (SF-7) land use, 3.8 acres of commercial along proposed Loop 288, 9.6 acres of multi-family and a 10 acre school site. Planned development (PD) zoning is anticipated it annexation is approved. The existing city limits is at the right-of-way line of proposed Loop 288 above the fringe of the Kingston Trace Subdivision. j~C~JjOROUNb Not applicable R AMS . DtPAfiT(",EM OR Wl0UP8 A!IlMD : No existing housing or population is located within the area of request. The Oak Bend %states SutAivision abuts this tract to the north and approximately two to tour residents are surrounded by the subject site to the east along the unnamed county road. Roadway included in the proposed annexation includes approximately 1,200 toot at both sides of Kings Row; 830 toot of the east and west side of Farris Road and 780 feet of the west half of Farris Road; and approximately 915 feet of the south halt of Silverdone Road. i City Cot~ail #eport }'bras! (A-~ 9 ) Numh 19" Pap 2 FISCAL INPAM Undetermined su ed:er A4*Oyd Prepared by: David =llison Senior Planner Appro Jeff Key Direotor of Planning and Developaant 15155 i,; J" i ON TDAAYH00 A DRIQAAWA ORA 81711 3VITIT39HOD DHI'11300A 30NAHIaA0 HA ; 830mme AO 83I.199Ug 7113H4IUpS , &WAVAM 10 38AHOM SHT )10'1 UNIMOM OHA fIA0110 8aMUl 110 "U'TIa"3"S 3HT A01 gy ~I;0"111AVA0I bssalvdsl boo ba06091 ,brslollos sad Vs1D ads gBA2938W -glupa 'aI'~ldjs7aa ~irsasisn to ssadoxuq ads lot abld svlj2isgwoo 3o se7ubaaoYq ad3 dslw wnabYOboo agar snlb o e V11D boo w&J Hale tad asVolgmo besonglaeb a io xsganaM ~31D s43 l8ASA3HW ads sys abld bod,liosob nlsssd artj saris ba nommoosl boo bswelval liotolads ~bessllodva lasogoYq bIg" ads nll nwodelasooanlvYaa wso bna sagbul ViID sd3 n1 boblvoiq sad llonuoD X510 ads t8AMHW 7o ad oj lij segge rf`sollot viss beau asllgqus ut ,inaaglupa l~q alil baa bavoi ialrs ads bna ;nlaTad besgaaos aa=lupa= esonanlbYO to abrD ads to (t) 6E.1 noliose ~&MVERW nails *-so* to sesullbnops Ila vvojggs IlanuoD (jID odl Ads bna ;000, lads sY'tJpol nasimm T31D ads to 0.2 nol3as8 IBASASHW sbnutsana lbio vd ad llada~aaenbesdebnl to gnlsor in oo ads rlol lo MIAM0 MASH HOTH30 10 YTIO 3HT 10 J10H000 SHT ISA013J HT 4W% 011211238 sot abld baiodaun golwollot ads n1 vmJI beiedwn ads ssdT ■s sq afbevoiggs boo bsq oos Vdovod *isl~,olm7odlbodoasis l olsoogo tasrsil dous =ot sbld oldlenoga97 saswol ads gnlad MM aid TNUOVA Ao H3y ON A33 nttt13913 '111 b70 FEq me AAA a!, t.ttslfi rtar t u A~ t~ ►..,r1 A_r Maa no rra ! t.o% Ar! 0[Il_! ! i+eaeel~ll.23&4&U f ~...l.f.... _-••i_%62~A gtaQ__LAS ifl M_atp_tfE_! e'ty ~Flud~~ttn w►~alr IrA AmQ IT38 .II "01T=4 bsisdau.. ovods ads to lavo7ggs bas oonasgaoos adl d sadT ads Ito '302to ads asgaooa Ifs2 ads 4abld basilmdue ads to anvil of 8a9784 boo aassl dour 701 abld ads gnI3110dus snoaIsq nl asolvios 10 eallgqut ~snonglup* 481611slan ads saadD7uq aslslsnac:p absabnals genolisoltlosge .elms sdy dslw sonablooos blg ,euolsaslvni blg ads al btulasnon babsislaib91110994 bnaar,slslot boo oogoxq .III 140 T0I bus bav07ggr gnt3s1Wue anosyaqq boo (JID ads bluods srdT A 0301 yesne of dslw abld bol3lodus ads to box eawril be3grooa Et-A 3JUG3=8 NOI TI[xllM msj . sbntps 31mdu8 a8el .r$ yYSUn$L qv-Toad sbnops 3lmdu8 wl .et Y34unaL Y a8el •e y3su3d*v toalq bas *all JIDAMOD sol p std oll a8el . t Y1au7ds3 ololno340 baoosll ao3asQ 01 60l300 3uollam boa oo13on rialldu9 a8Q! yuu3ds3`'~ moil sbnsps almdu8 beer .Ol y=au3do+l v qu-Aosd sbasps 31mdu8 68el .Sl y=au3dfI-" asxam nolsalmmoO pal3sbnsmmoaoy asel .Sl y".su3deT nol pnl3ss4 ollduq 38=13 ablori Ilonuo:+ 1310 b8el .8l Y36uado+l ilbinoMD bsooss no3ata of solion 88el .el Y3603del .Iuollso bna sol3oa Aalldu9 b8el .lS y3su3d*% *931 abnops 3lmdu8 beet .!S y3su3dol qv-Aotd sbntps 31mdu8 bee! .aS y2su7dWI,. pnlasoA oildug bnoooa ablog llonuoO 1310 beef $A holaN " sell sbrsps 3lmdu8 aeel sw Aossm qu-Xoad sbnspa 3lmdu8 heel .Sl 407aM nollaxsnns ao3u3l3anl llonuoO y3lO see! .et rlosaM spnlbsooooq slolao3fio bioooa no3nsa o3 sonsnlb3O 89el 40S 403IN 9onsnlb4jo dolldu8 aeel .ES d*36N moil abases llmdue &Bel .lS IligA gu-.Toad abntps 3lmdu8 abet JS II3gA lslosgs 3s llonuoa y317 yd nol3os 1sn19 aeel es ll3gR pnl3tom btilso llonuoO 1310 oAl yd nollos so3onea paaeo LU,. te~un.tM S ~ 4 a8Q! ~S! ~YauYdeq -Ixo7ggs 3o nollsxenns bsaogo7q to laavo7ggs bnemmoooA .0Z-A .q dluo2 teelslai nollA..bl0 30 d17on gn.Ennige ae7as d.Aia ylelsm .bso7lisA .q.2 0 .0.0 3' lase bns ,181S Mq 10 leew bsoA nsyA Io ni bsbuloni ebso7 edl isdi belsle noeilla 7M :TAOgaA ggAT2 isdl bile elf .yli0 sdl yd berrislnism ad btuow noi3sxenns 21711 :boxenns ad muminim a is aniwollol edl lsdl abnemmoosi 11sla nolgmo0 b7sdo~A yd benoiiileq noil7oq Xislnulov e7os 271 aeTes M (E) bns ;5312 Ao178 emoA e7os 08 (S) ;nollug .L A bus .bsoA gssiD y7oA71H Io sbia dluoa edl gnolB .lneas7q enoM :AOVAq HI .1naesiq enoM ;Q320gg0 b6eogoiq Io Invoiggs bnemmoo97 of bevom aaTodisl0 7M :ZOI2I03a bI0 3o d17on gninniged 297os a.Ala yteismixo7ggs to nod s'- XORRs Io lass bas 1IBIS Mq Io lasw bsoA nsyA Io dluoa O2elslad nollA ylevominsnu bas suoea .704 yd bebnooe2 bsoiliaq .1,2 ~ .0.0 (0 a) bei-r rso eoTOB 2&2,ZSI 3o noiisxsnns beaocro7o 3o IsvoTggs bnemmoosA EE-A bne8 9sO 3o dluo2 ,88S goo.I Ls2ogo7q bna woA agniX is bsis5o7 ,bsoA emobl9v112 30 dluoa bna ,aelslaa T -xenns y7slavlov s 2i 2idi lsdi belsl2 noeill8 V :TROgHg ggAT2 edl lsdi bebbs sH aelslooaeA bsoA yelaseT yd iasupe7 no is elia Iood32 97os OI s 703 1slq y7anlm!I9Tq a bsliimdue ead Q2IG -Till s ead se7s Sidi lsdl bite sH noilaxenns beeogoTq aidl ni .Isilneloq lnemgoIsvs b Sno712 XI -sxenns aidl n! bebutoni al aelslaq bne8 IsO 11 bgAes nsTUL .7M .on bite noeilla 7M noll .lneae7q enoW :AOVAq 01 .lneasIg enoV4 :Gaaogg0 beeogo7q Io Isvo7ggs bnemmoosT of bevom iSoo78 . aIA : WONION bsaogo7q bas woA agn1X is belsool a9ios ZS2.2SI 3o notis"~` zen smobT9vI12 io diuoe bas ,aslsla3 bne8 IsO 3o dluoe K88S good .(0-6) bsi77so yIauomInsnu bas suoaa .•rM yd bsbnooe2 bsoA wetq saxvss~ aseYA bexannA ee7d3 sgsq euoeastteastM ..I beitslant ad tttw baboon a7edw sngta assn 19a71Bi (2) ev110e219 ad, tells sainom 8 jtnoxmaxenquas to n1dl1w (qID) MA7gotq lnamavo7gmI tsjtgao II -qu at jsdj nstq !sal evtl s to aiatanoo y110 ad$ to VO sdT -abtug Xottoq dour Xd bsstlt7ot7q at astq edT .lttseQ balsb :as seatl assts 7adlo o3 be7sgmoo as aeatviss lot basmoG (t) abultngsm nollmlugor to g1taneb no Xtltsq bassd bedattdsfes ,ssets 7adlo of betsgmoo ametdotq to bas selbuls taaotasslo7q bns abxsbasle lsotadoel .ae1l1aul7oggo to elats7~se7 tsotndoel 'to tstulsa .X*to edl to Xattoq dJwotp bsoastad 943 no losgmI (S) .eatmonooe (1to ttstevo no losgmT (E.) edl at gntnnstq qIO 701 be7ebtanoo ad tttw sets bexenns edT moil tasX sno nsdl 791not on ad tttw dotdw nstq qIO gatmooqu edl tsel gainnstq qID wan s141 nI nollAxonns to alsb odl emus e41 of %tgatbtooas bagbut ad tttw sets notlsxenns .Xlto edl to oasis tad*o its as stteltto bedsttdsles r nalg eotvxs8 aae7A bexennA owl egaq aleezle .7 avob7asad to 7tage7) alee7ts to eoaaaelatam YanegsemH (t) (.ale woll att2$7J 7o2 x7aeasosn 8e7usaem ,aelodioudo .notlaxenns to elab evttoalle aril no atged lltw edl at as etaad emae 041 no eonane*ntam satluoR (S) no Asia bexenoa edl at atged lllw ,X31o Ineee7q .notlaxenna to e2ab evtloolle ed* -allalent ,alee7*a to gatoat7use7 bna no1fou7*anooeA (E) to notlou7lenoo sellIllost eganta7b m7ole to note ,alnem^vo7gm1 7otam dour 7ed$o boa ,a7el*ug baa ad7ua galn7evop adl Xd beatm7elab at e7ots7edl been edl 8A bedelldatae adl 7ebau badatlgmoooa tad lltw ybod .111o edl 20 setotloq veotv7e8 aotloegsaI .0 y*lo ed* Xd bebtvo7q won seotv7es nolloegenl XnA (t) ,galeuod sag ,gatdmulq ,laol7loels ,gntbltud) ae7a aottaxenas ad* at ntged lltw (,ale ,no1IA$1aaa sa01Iaxenna to elAb evt*oelle edt no 3nlao3 bna gntnnslq H ytto edI to aollotbst7ut gataoS boa gntanalq edT (I) evtloette edl no ae7a bsxeana edl of baelxe Iltw 7911ae7edl Iltw gntnnalq V110 no1IaxeanA to slab .ae7a bexenna aril eaagmoone gatldgtd 199718 I -naladue edl at bellalant ed lltw gnlldgll 199718 edI dI1W eaaBb7oDDa at aas7a begoleveb Qf.latl ,Xllo aril to aetotloq bedetldasse notIae7adH L gntlatxe lla eau jam aeia bexenna edl to elnebleeH -Delis edl no ,sole ,el7aq 1891*tltaa1 lanollae7097 boa eb7abaAla emae edT nO1IaxeanA 20 Slab evil -lot ed lltw X11o laese7q ad$ at beau won eetalloq boa oua7go7q SanO11497097 edl gntbnagxe at bewol .yllo beg78lne edl at 8e11111aat notludt7lela ot7rae13 X lot noinea to ysn to eau e41 abnemmooe7 %Ito edT (t) .7ewoq 02710919 NoT MCI CIO YTI 0 A1RA (IRXZM R01 $0I VAU 10 RAM aotviss to nstq 2, lads seYtupe7 bobnems as AM stotlxA %8P.RR3gW 9onsatblo ns to e~,sssaq os 'ioizq 11ta s to lbod gata't9bboaa ;el d ASIA aseyatxaans as to aotlsxenas gatlstgmelaao 9t nosnsQ io 1110 ads %BAIR3H11' .notlsxonva besogoiq edl to qsm s no avroda as bebnuod at doldw suss Y'I'I0 3HT 10 .I 10HU00 YTI 0 3HT X8 Q3v1083R TI 38 , aaog3RZH WOM , H7M3Q '10 as sOTe etotliA to anolelvoiq ads of $nsuzIuq .t nodose bs9ogo'sq gds poi belgobs 1ea1VIealiolnslq~Batwollol 9abo ds0 se1s sxx*T aBtq 901viae olas8 .I soltoq A 7edlo bnm attso oaaea.~~7s8 beottogieat'uox (t) 19aaoa7eq saeaexq yiatau a svt$59 19 ads no bebtvoiq ad lttw jaemglup9 bas ;notlsxenas to slab 49201XIAM $99719 ,angle 0111a7l ,atsngte allta iT (S) beItsseat ad ittw soolvab 10'i140o oltlais iodlo bas elst7goigqs 1d b9dattdslabiabasle oillailebaA Xbule g'il'l , 8 -gtupe bns teanoeieq lneeeiq 9dl 1d uotla9loIq sill (1) bebtvo'sq ad ttnollnxenns VD11411 9111 941 to n ab evtloeiie edlno ate law .0 eau Sat7l9uba2 bns tmtoIsmrnoo otse9mob zoi 791s (t) 111o gatlslx9 moil ~melsos Milo Is bsbtvoiq ad 111v bns nollAxonas to sssb eviloeiis edl no seatl soasbiooos at bebassxe as asatt wen moil 7esiseaedl aril to 9boo edl to A xtbnegqs to eo.4 91otlts dllw .asxsT joinsa to 11!0 lowe8 Q besoeanoo ad 111w ameis boxonas edl at eetsjego7q (1) to e0.4 etotlzm dltw sonsbxooos at seait 7awee of .saxel' nolnea to 1110 adl to aboo edl to A xtbnegqs nolloetto0 sauiaR .3 -oiq won eotvisa nolloettoo sauie7 7stuge7 ymaa sdT (1) adl 03 bobnelxe ad tttw llto edl nldltw bebty evisoeiie ads 79s1s dsnom Sao aaollsxeans 10 Slab set WW a 1004 ta9it Beet .111 30*W"o , ct-A 0ff am tdtiq Iv 64at So tea114 so "619 also, 16161 goo ILA 0 t• tSI02 •di at bossyolt "1016 bah " aslesT !o 09696 %A114100, "flitdA 40310 g1w2 .a *AS to 0114 641916 • 8 sas111e2o'M4 tai a>•da .'4arlwt Nltl1 .i eAiw0A1N`t• wl%9oo6 laslil14 sbmfi 6oAslldssas oil a0ltut Vote 11111114 ad$ pa M9014 • 04 60!99300 se4s41is Vd sls2 ua• tali NrMwed do"* ad$ Al otttt MAIM 64" 40-96 Al .rw3w lo $ Irsvlut 010 hiss ads !s "it tls6pwd 40"N ads "led OW ts s let Saloq a as Mo3 te.tts !o °eMHlb a seas 010 '110 °te 161116% rJMSS? a 10'1 11104 6 es Mss! tt.ltlS Ze ea4aislb • .14109 'tt 'tt 00 a11sow`lea%** • 101 011104 a 03 Meat 69.6et' to owsslb t .last •E4 'Is ote ds1o94200VT s os Ms! lt.ett to ea44"It 0 4 awe 22017 s10a3ea • let it104 6 102 S11ae4 t as Meat I.tl► to etas0alb s .Mast 'tl '911 eq do3a PONT Mast 1161 at Sense* 011100 odo "led OWN 4ToVlM$ 11161402 614' 1 !sea lsM as to call rss6arlod bat 161100 s at enlttt ea16 0pte4 6!60 IVOIW i6pa~sasssl s6 ~A bses doses et.►It to wona sib s 6ea1 6160 at boo sepal two 6440 P416 sell" a t2Mae% 4113161 bias to 0elsoeasssal *do plod 110!69 bi ~ ee ai its Aslw bsel {wet win as WAN 0s "st 11.111 to oe0s11sib 6 41403 bass 1011 OVAt160 22mm set Sol" a 6 10! Sol" • oo seat tows !o soas11atb a 4aw Ott 'RtN dsM .can 440'nw0 "/11.1 61st 0161 to 0011, 46wad deg" eds at teat *0 01611 "led oast 14til 11e6as*" 4Ywaw 11323 *do to sail Ysi6AASd dtvW WSW to °saooolb 6 °eall %*vivo bias "*Is %saw 'tt 'te 146 AMYet =1740T Ios6stttoomll SOSUve60do swit '11"aboodda10M Mat 614 NaYI Oslo MAIM, Sit" asst pod Twill 6 east tt.tll► to aulba3 6 dSlw 1161 adS of ew1,a a !MU tt1°Mewd#lG4 8240151' 161100 0161 val"64 4096 '6S t to slop l•sm bass 'Paboved s 6 as taws S*"1 S 60.!ol" Ott fell !o SWA ots6ibit 1202 doso& a" toted saw %Ywaa Maas 116 Mt vy1 0360102 b!! M 9116 tel&"* a to" 090111 66 600011 "01 " took" Ot ou A111et oees01b10 rd) $000 061 '611 *0 1611109 630W to seaOOasitib A meil pol !e 0441 senses edi 00 aollol14 M• itiesestdSSoo see 10 . .!tot 0101 b06t !0 s o toy60 HOW "1416iia0 646 enlaaatOd !o sro6t4 0161 es soot f1.1 UTAIMB& i "W YaJUXT\tE-A 10ITAX3tKA e3e(A A,4 NO yRjIbAjH OI.IeUg YO _NOITON :TART BNOMS 03TUA3THI JJA OT H3YID YOLUN U 3DITCM not3axsrns osu3t3snt ol a•aoga7q saxsT ~no3aoO to T3lD sdT •d3 bbs o3 Y32D Was 3o s31all j *u d a4 3 16:11A S 3 a8n70NOoi3 bna wo-sed bsdos33s ,"A" 3 sdi 30 shat! olsTogioo •43 os ,nlo7•d sons otti xd baeQl3oC3t0 llonuo0 XS )3 693 0xo3sd boo Xd bled •d lllw gntaseH o11du9 A .-A ads no ssx@T nojns0 3o X113 sdi to to Csb a a si• 0 lloauo Y 0 as nl .q Y0010 '0 04:C 3a ,a$e! *nos qq !la Y03 , wel, nolnsa to x320 ads to gntbllu8 lsgl*tnuM bna aat3 bias 3A .nol2&x•nnx beaogo7q evods ads nl b•3an s3nl ad bns 0ssggs o3q I3ti fs a little oi douc 101a .b*Dal ison bs3s.&*lnt s fi , nlAs bna aiwsm bls nal3nsm ntsosd a7s33sm bns a3atd3 ads a! lioa •AAS ~si lllw ,beno 11a o0 '(32D •d3 *-Joao bns Yd bled ad 111w plYs•H olldu4 A 3o Cab 043 no ,asxsT ,noscoo 3o X110 063 3o a 0 s • as 0 llanuo T D sdi nl .M .9 :ioolo'o OO:C 3s 468el anosssqq Ila 101 ,ssx•T ,nolne0 40 T310 ed3 to gnlbllu8 lsglolnuM bna •s:l3 btss 3A .0013aYSnns bssogosq •vods sdi nl boas3ssn2 •d Dns Yssggs of 3d linlasvbas aos3yemobli Ilsa30ls.boosi ison b•ysne3n3 aaosysq ! 00cl3on 64s3 t!!w ,bsnol3nem nl•sed sYe33sm bns sgnld3 ed3 al UUT ,NOT ~4 '40 ID :TL3TTA $3TAIMaZA N►QA YSJWT\EE-A ~ ~~rr11 fr - r , 0 tow , 03TAT43 01MIS XAO . e • r r w r w r to t . • w MOM • J r w r' : r r * w • r I` OK ~41 ~to01 MY 'It V I r • r / AULU w w w, • r • YAW 9tA MI 1 f A w w 0 ~~w 1 \ Op _ _ r I r ~~~r Y t• ~ + rrr ' 4 111ANIX ' lOAIIT ' ` ,N r ~•t•OtMY ' I 2s-r~s ~Z ,tine P.114IA 3 885 ~~4.1 O ' =1 d1M f ~ .t r> co bA nud g tip 9I*113.m 0 lfo9 • yy o~ _ -OOP • 33JTRAH . bi•i~ •~If~o J ' -CIO T2 303ji q0 ABA baed ciao bA woA =Qn i~ ~ n0 BYttt ~ ~ gg++~~ oo sso~or4 -+d a s'!T . • • Oki ' r l IT U 1• 8 aol~axsnaA ~•taieulova2 'SOS aol~axsaM ~tsytruiaV ~r . POO- Yyaptmu8 qu~:iasfl ifonvo:! yjt~ dBQi ~A do7aM S epsq pnliseH oildug s bl.oH :Q3AIUQSA HOITOA notjBXenns dilw beeoolq . i : BaVITAHSi3TJA J89upol yoga qsM .i :8TH3MHDATTA naiq 9au bnsi IBUJgeoroD .S nosIlla bivsa xennsiq 7o2ne8 PEl81 AgH3~A 1IOHUOO YTIO THSH2 YRAMMUa qU-}BOAS a8ei dolaM :STAa DKITHaM bsaogoyq add lot pntisad ollduq s bloH Ma LHUa solos aase.2S1 Yl9jsmlxolggs to noldsxenns a9JsJsS bassa AsOtoodjuoa 188Stoo djuae abna l9 s .(EE-A) bsoR amoblevit2 yd b9JJtmdus noiJaxenna lot Ja9up9l a at atdT :YRAMMU8 6918 slob aJI A .89Jblo088A boon Y91869T bns yJl9golq a9JatoOBaA baoR y91849T n99wj9d yaoinulovni lot bsaogolq at 881 goof bsaogalq pnlisoupox 9xs al9noijiJ9q edT aoljax9nns YJID 10 yl9vtteb 9luani of pnix;os bags noldaxenns at nsiq eau unai lbuJg9onoo A .89otv198 yilmat aipnis to adol 8Si pnlwocia bodosjJs pnols Istolemmoo to solos 8.E %osu bnai (C-q2) ,yllmst-ljlum 10 a9los a.e ~88S good b9aogo3q insmgoiovab bannstq gjla toodoa glob Ol b bns ti beJa9upol ad yIsAll Jaom lilw pntnos (aq) Jnsbnegebnl noJnea 9dT bevolggz at nolioxanns Jsiq ylsnimitolq s bgJilmdue sod Jolljata toodo2 y uJn9male nA 9Jla loodoo slob 01 edi lot .bsaogolq at Alsq a19va of lslimle loodos pntjalxe to dJuoa bns Jngostbs anip9d ails aldT R9JsJa8 bne8 AsO sdJ nt dnomgolsvsb IslJn9bla9l pnlauod jstjn9bta97 lonolilbbs bns notatvlbdua 9dT Jase 9dJ of ails add yd bsbnuollua at aniped anti dtmll yJlo pnliaixe Ja9lsen add to Jaew bna d~W oa Jost 00 yl9jsmlxolggs pnola) joslj Jootdus add 30 9pbe nlsjaswdduoa .(nolalvibdu2 soslT nodapnIX grid to 9pnllt 9dJ i9olbq jootdu8 add to 9pb9 nl9da9wdJuos 9dT .yaw-to-Jdpll 88S good b9aogolq sJuda b9Jslsgoa atsJxsq owJ to adalanoo yJ39golq 9dT boon atlls4 bns ~bsoq 9moblgvjla ~woR apnIX yd mlot of djioM add of woR spalX Ito sodonsld JsriJ 99tJlsH booq b1914 99IJYsH dJiw noidoennoo a ddlon 911m t of A\E Yl9Jbmlxolggs at bsoR b1gli .Jaeupel 10 sole 911 10 I 1 formal written agreement as a result of the oceeptane:s, approvaL, and awarding of the bids, the City Maoager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bic; Proposal and related bid documents herein Approved and oacepted. SECTION IV+ That b the acceptance and a roval of the above numbered items of t~e submitted bids the City Council hereby authorises the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its pasaage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this _a day of wreh , IM. RIM= 04 096VAILT MA CITY or Dar" ~ TE~IAS ATT2$T% CKAJUAME ALIAM, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF Dl,NTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL IfOl f t DEBRA ADANI DRAYOVITCR9 CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS IV a y BID ITEM NUMBER NO. VENDOR NT ^9588 All Pave Mark CgER, 22.4U.JL0 9582 All _ Mtrtco waste Svstifols 10.420.00 9590 all Bill Utter Ford )42•G___~2,;G3 i ;a DATE: tlarch 4, 1986 C11Y COUNCIL REPORT 10: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #9576 4/0 CONCENTRIC CABLE RECO19EXUATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, Gra bar Electric, in the amount of $1.17 per foot for a total of 111450.00 for 15,000 feet. SUMM Y: This bid is for the purchase of a.approximately 120 days supply of 4/0 concentric underground cable. This material is replacement for warehouse stock. BKKIS V16 Tabulation Sheet PRQEM, DEPARIMTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Warehouse Inventory and Electric Distribution Department _I _IWACT: 1985/86 Working Capital Account 0710-004-6502-67be Respe u11y submit ed: L1 yd V, Marrell City Manager pared by: Nave: Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: Name: J. Marshall, C. .11. i>?~irt tSS~it~ Ag.t I I I I { I I ~ ; 910 1 9576 t ; 1 1 { 010 TITLE 410 CONC. UMDEROROUMD CARI I DEALERS I PRIESTER I CUMMIMS I 0RAYRAR 1 NELSON 1 MESCO 1 TEMPLE 1 0,E, I OPENED 214186 2 p,m, I ELECTRIC I I 1 I i 1 INN;, I R"LY I ACCOUNTI 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 f 1 1 I I 1 1 ................»__...________»___.__1-------------I-----_ 1 I 4TY I ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VEIM 1 KM I VENDOR I I - I - I I I . . _ 1 1 { 1 1 I 1 I I I { I fl 1 113500 FT 1410 Canc. Cable i 1153 1 1120 1 1.196 ; 1.17 I 1.181 1 1.20 1 l,2'S 1 1.166 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 I ~ I I I 1 1 I I I 1.26k 1 i 1.219 1 1,0915 I I I I I 1 { I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 I 1.138 1 1 1 1 I J I d - 111s11vs1y "112 Days` T 126 DIYi -I Mid March I Mid hatch 1 21-38 Days 1 35-42 Days 1 14-16 Mks 1 9-10 Mks I { I { 1 1 I { I 1 24-26 Nks 1 14-16 Wks 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 3-6 Mks 1 I I I I I I { 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I Is 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 121,000 ft I 1 1 { 1 I I I I i I01Riou { l 1 1 1 I I t I { i I I I I 1 f i ; 1 I I I I I i i 1 I { I I I DATE: March 4, 1985 CITY CMKIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: U oyd V. Harrell, City Manager SI ECT: BID #9578 FILTER HEDIA FOR WATER PLANT AECOMENQATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid meeting specification of BOS Sand and Gravel in the total amount of $58,982.00, Fob Denton, with delivery in 20 days after receipt of order. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of filter media to replace existing filters at the Municipal Water Production Plant. The lower price offered by Water Equipment fails to meet our opecificatlon in the size ranges of specific material. euxam ; Tabulation Sheet PleD6RA * R ARTMEIITS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Water Production Plant FISCAL IVAC7: I94618C Budget Funds Account Number for Water Plant Improvements Respe 'u"' 'u'mit .d.0,01 / oyd V, Harrell City Manager ZabLahe~ Name: Tan D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: Johrr J. Marshall. C.P.Q. I t k t I I I I E I / 1 ! t I 1111 ors I t I I 1 I i i I 1 i = { t Sol 11111 MIN M/rA I an I C MIll6 1 NIEAIW I M31p1ww t wmm 16001111 1 IMi1f16 I f1111M I OW 1 0 1 NMIIS I 01871 I 111tH I PNO Fokwry 11, 1111 1 p+. I (M. I CK I MVAM11 I fMIIMNlNI I IMP I 1 IIM. I61YIfI1NA1NIM1 MM 1~ 1 t 10601.91 t 7101. I law" 1 Atf11M11 1 FAMMCM I 1 1 t t 1 I I 1 1l1AtEl E I I t ~ 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 i I I 1 1 .i .........I.......... I1......~,...1. -..-»»f »._..«...1- -I. - -I- ..........I........ .I...........I............. -i- ..........I...........I............. ! I "m 1 71100 I 01m t r low 1 tE61M tom 1 7100 I W MM 1 W MM In" I IHMM f .I.._._..I 7---- ._.__...1............1. 1- .._.......l......___..1............1- _.........1...........I.....»......I............1 I. ~ 1 1 IN2 !F►Iln G+v+l ( 1 t 6.01 LN 1 I t 6.15 1 5.N I L% I L311 11.15 1 5.1111 t LN 1 2 1 1321 IFllhr 0m1 I I t 6.351 W 1 { t 1.51 1 3.31 1 Lit 1 11.111111 6.50 1 1.9371 i LSI I 3 1 1571 IFllln A+1lr6cil• twl 1 t 211416 1 I LO I 1.36 I I'll I I 5.21 I Lb 1 111.411 1.51 1 6.1110 I 1.11 I t I { 1 101 ~ I I I I I ! I I l 1 t I ♦ I w., I w I f .1 n r I 1 ~ I I .f . • { •I ..r I • ! • ~ i'' I 1 1 t I I I I t I I l t I I I 1 l i 1111 IFr11« W+vtl I 1 1 LM I 6.H 1 1 I 1.15 1 s.N I Lf1 1 1.21 I Lri r 5.1133 t S.N 1 2 1 1371 Iftllor 136+1 1 1 1 11436 I LN 1 1 I 6.361 5.141 Lit I IIA I 1.50 1 4.91261 LN I 3 1 7526 Ifrilow Mi1wKIN Cwl I 1 lN.11 I I L/I 1 11.361 Lil I I L" I LM I 5.11 I 1.51 1 610141 Lil I I I I 3Mt I 1 I I 1 I I t I { t t = t 1 I t ! I 1 I I 1 I I ; { t IEN+I A 6 1 I 11,137.71 1 I I 17,113.0 1 1 t 1 67,1".0 I 11,63'3." I M,0f;.N 1 311126." I 66711.1101 I 5105".111 1 ! I I I I ! 1 I I I r 1 I t i I I I I I { 1 I I t I I IILN I t I t I I 1 1 1 I E I I I I I tnllq t I I t r I I t ( I 1 I I t I 1 t I i ! 1 I Iklivay 110-ii Mp I 16 of" 1 M Mat I IS !Yp 1 36-" Mpl I Mys 1 30 toys 1 110 kit t 31 Mot 1 N toys 1 IS 6+ys 1 S0-" MY I I I I 1 t I 1 1 I I 1 I t t I t t ! I I I I I t I 1 t t I I I I k 1 I t I I I t I I t E I I t I i I t 1 ! I ! 1 I t I t i t ; 1 r I I I s' I I I I I I t I I I t ! i I I I I r 1 I ! t I t ! I 1 March 4, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL PROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT Consider Bid Opening - Bid 09578, Filter Media Water Treatment Plant (Phase I) Upgrade RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February 200 1986, recommended to the Council approval of the second lowest bid of Bos Sane: Company, Frankford, Illinois, in the amount of $58,982.20 to supply gravel, sand and anthracite coal for the replacement of existing filters 1 through 8 at the Water Treatment Plant. SUMMARY The bids were opened February 18, 1986, and the re,ults are as follows: Gravel, Sand Gravel $ Coal Only and Coal Sand 1. Water E uipment, Houston $579584.40 - 2. Bos Sand Co. Frankfort IL 58,982.20 - 3. Triton Environ, CA 620098.98 - - 4. Maintenance Eng. TX 62,741040 - S. Unifilt Corp, PA 56,210.99 - - 6. Sturgis Mfg. KS 790020.90 - » Cast -Ind ltl- rrod, CA• , 79; 7,24'. 97 8. Robert Palmer Co. PA 819773,00 - - 9, Carbonite Filter, PA - - $25,754.6( 10, Shamokin Filter, PA - - 27,021.4( 11. Centralia Coal, PA - - 295803.85 12. Southern Product, NC - $40tOOO.SO - 13, American Mfg. WI - 40,305.60 The lowest bid of Water Equipment, Houston, has taken an exception to the specification, t.~ereby does not conform to the particle size distribution. This exception is not acceptable to the Utility Staff or the Public Utilities Board. The second lowest bid of Bos Sand Co,, IL, though only $1,397.80 higher, does not have any exceptions to the specification. Hence, the Board and Staff recommend approval of the second lowest bid of Bos Sand in the amount of $58,982.20. BACKGROUND The replacement of existing filter media to dual filter media on filters 1 through 8 is part of Phase I construction of the Water Treatment Plant upgrade to 41SOU:17 4- r 30 MGD (from 24 MGD). This item was removed from the contract of Boswell Company (contractor for Phase I construction) through a change order, which the City Council has already appproved. The Utility Department will accomplish this work by in-house water plant personnel and this bid is for the purchasing of filter material. The change order resulted in $163,343 in cost savings, and by purchasing the material through this bid at $580992.20, and by accomplishing the work by in-house personnel, the City can save approximately $90,000 over the above material and labor. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUP'S AFFECTED: City of Denton Municipal Utilities, Contractor and Ci~izens. FISCAL IMPACT Recommended award to Bos Sand Company $58,982.20 Source of Funds: Water Bonds FY86 budgeted amount for Water Plant Upgrade $1,0000000.00 623-008-0460-9101 Resp ully Submitted, Prepared by: Srini Sundaramoorthy it, Civil Engineer APPROVED: VED: a so Director of Utilities BXHIBIT 1. Bid Tabulation II PUB Minutes 2/20/86 41SOU: 18 i Q I trst r mr6a ANOM Pow Wr►T[A' Md1YT. WAra UY ►I 111PY CW 0#10- PODW "POTRA A CMM. MMi1l1 #W L MAI s" tM Q Hp11TM1 17t GA~I. N►1! /A~ "004101 TX 1GAJlYRRM /R Itri 1' emm 6JMYl,. 1Msjt c" it P.m" I'* rwrat lIIwC 1!iD n ♦ f fD s T,iN Jw - - • i na Fsat.ee s s ie TIK•ee rAmtt Col. retA rr Jf i /l is, f". so V* W# 5.6* rpos-00 0A.8 fe errs Js ayswTss 1 ,r,>ZJwrt p,!!r'A • Ja,N9•i+ s s+,~f, r, • . / rnttlt &M U 1710 emit 1 l ao i Jl,sis•le 1 i•fI /~OMe+ 1f>v 1 044" pip Mu" IAWO Il1D n r Y'XC s %x" sp s Tt",,p 1 i•A,►' s I,Jfs•Il• -0ail Tats w frfAt, 7110 rr 1 s I► h,arr•se selN•N Iw - SI► NrNS•e►• on r s, ,Iw} f. ie • r .sev s. ti► s . is, ev r Apo",•Jt0 1 4J,le1 ~L NICE*'r~ ! .lIrJIN 10 t 1l0 1tI /O ! f1r! s Tt,TS~ et / N,sr1•H s 4e,ars-+r1 is,~0/ y, r'{ 1 r ~s~ C.wI. aid Aja/Ar /Af CA11160 nl sptrwx woopiT, TRIIdI1 AIVINW- J RUtrRT F"thim IA OLW1 b PA. NrfrA) N,4 GA• r oA 1 ' - - 66.19 A r0,bo•-60 • 6 ~1 1 0,877),s • Al" It, 911 N - - - i 6 tr A !,$07.10 t ~4 7,376•/d 0.11 10,714 rr^ slf~ r/~~>r ♦ s rr r 01,Iffj/ - - f•LO rf,I►r •A I %lb IWO 00 ' I rRtwn► ra487740 a r~ s11 r0 A..e~,ss7 als jr,r>, •r. I I - - - I~ J /1r i6f f IyKN• f r 41 • 17,610• - - - I ilo 1fliri 00 6 14 71s>6-SO IF r7 ro,ller047 1iM01%AMN► As~rr ars,a07t 046 Pik 1•w..n c•sa Iy,16~00 1 / Iwv t. N 16 fr d♦v 6 /tb rt~Y 6 a r1s0A•7•, • Is,nne« r 2r0Air IO r J~fMr,ee 6 4f,I~6.oo ♦ at,0i6•N• • =i,1tM 4r, ♦ 40,000 j0 l if,i+l•~► ~ 70,111 M ~ 1 , o • 4 v&l DID / ~t 9870-404M • •o •s sru+~a~ rMr47p vr►iei r uar • iID kS 2L ova ACCOul" I -t ♦t i• 1 77N 4• A do It 10,641, pop 4 $-A* t 7~ti~Mr ♦ .mow . y . • . • . s•N yt./►yi {-sfy AifM or '+•q i,rn et 9,10 1to loo,4• 0. Jto'I"ve 467 r4 su•42. • 9t+~y w r 17,yr4.1t+. i 3~~~rs.1~, _ r ♦F~0 to.ilyM 11,"140.0• • l•t'►, I N,1MK • ~.,r 1'Nrb iri Ibsst'i•N r L.R► ►,ria.s rMt 110^40 DYO. w+400 ro ,0 11,Moo It rt 1011W" / wt sw I0 of` 04 b A4,04.- rte v f . 0.^y 3 ~ seen ro t ,~,~t.•~a 6.,a,r 's4~" °mi`,$ 4%".Ty'r>Ff~h "e 't :!°i3 z£q~.R t.... n°°'.w a:'+j tA!'a i."°Sw•..r '4x'C` EXCERPT PUbLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES February [U, 1956 1. CONSIDER AWARD OF BIU #k9678, FILTER MEDIA AT WATEII PLANT Ham explained that the Utility Staff recommended approvai of tiie second lowest bid of Bos Sand Company, of Frankfort, Illinois, in the amount of $68.982.20 to supply gravel, sand and anthracite coal for the replacement of existing filters i through 8 at the Water Treatment Plant. The bids were opened February 18, 1986. Bos Sand was able to meet the specifications, whereas Water Equipment of Houston, the original low bidder, was not able to meet the specifications. The replacement of existing filter media to dual filter media on filters 1 through 8 is part of Phase I construction of the Water Treatment Plant upgrade to 3U MGD (from 24 MGD), This item was removed from the contract of Boswell Company (contractor for Phase I construction) through a change order, which the City Council had already approved. The U'Lility Department will accomplish this work by in-house water plant personnel and this bid is for the purchasing of filter material. The change order resulted in $163,343,UU in cost savings, and by purchasing the material through this bid at $613,982,20, and by accom- plishing the work by in- house personnel, the City can save approximately $90,ODU.UU over A% above maUr of and labor. .r Ham explained the fiscal impact as follows: Recommended award to Bos Sand Company $tics,982.20 Source of Funds: Water Bonds FY 86 budgeted amount for Water Plant Upgrade $1,UUO,000.00 Thompson motion, Boyd second, to approve the award of bid #9678 to Dos Sand Company. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. _ .a-.. Fr r..rs mss. I.^ F DATE: March 4, 1986 CITY 'PAMIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FQN: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: 81D #~9680 INSECTICIDES AND HERBICIDES RECp~TIp1: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification for each item as follows: Item 1 6 8 Estes Chemical Total $ 513.80 Item 2,5,6,79&9 Tri-Sentry Chemical Total $8,320.28 Item 3b4 Van Waters 8 Rogers Total 5 579,50 Total Bid $14,413.58 "MY This bid is for the purchase of insecticides and herbicides for use by the Parks Department. The quantities are an estimated one year supply. BAC106RQIgtO: Tabulation Sheet PRp6RA,NS, DEPAKTIgITS OR SI@M AFFECTED: Park Maintenance Department FIS~L iM~'~Y'. 1985186 Ludget Funds Account y#100,.003 0064-8105 Resper ully submitted: Ll yd Y. Ha rill City Manager P pared by., Names Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: Jan J. lbr.;hall, C.P.M. l r I I 1 ; I I BID 1 9580 1 ) i ) I ! I BID TITLE INSECTICIDES/NEANICIDES i ESTES I TRI-SENTRY I LESCO i LAS I CHEMICAL I VAN MATERS I OPENED 2120186 2 P,M. CHEMICALS I CNENICAL ) I CDHPANY 1 t T01' 1 4 ROBEAS I ACCOUNT$ I I CORP, I 1 ISPECIAm CO,) f i I I ! 1 i ; ...................................I-------------i.............I-------------I-------------1-------------I-----•--------1 1 1 DIY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 ----I---------I----------------------- --1-----....----I------------- I-------------i-------------I------------- ' I 1 ! Insecticides ! I I I 1 i i i 1 I I I I I 1 ) I I 10 4hitaire PT270 1 41.66 1 49.53 1 No Bid 1 41,15 1 1 43.21 1 ; i i I I I I I 1 I 1 Herbicides I I I I ! I 1 ! I i I 1 I I I ; 2 1 120 01 )Roundup 1 75.55 1 1042 1- 63.40 i ' 1 '1 Iti lbust I 335.48 1 346.90 1 1 350.00 1 345,00 1 320.00 1 4 1 1 Cs IStirflan 7SN I 54.30 1 ! i 1 $4.00 1 10.65 1 5 1 400 1b. IDyclout 46 1 51.08 1 1.01 1 I 1.25 1 1.05 1 1 6 1 100 lb. IAtrilide 00 N I 1 1.53 1 I I 2.67 1 1,89 I i ! I i I I 1 1 1 I I Mleceflaneoos i l f { I I i i 1 i I I i 1 1 i 1 1 4 81 lAtrlnal i $8.04 I 8 1 0 81 10rtho X-71 Surfacent 1 12,15 1 14,49 1 1 14.20 1 12.17 1 12.55 1 9 1 12 CA )Nutra Sal ; 4.00 ; 2.26 1 ! 1 37,90 1 2.30 1 1 1 ; i I I I i 1 {Delivery ! 5 Days 1 7-14 Days ; ; 10 Days i 1 3-5 Days I I I 1 I I l i I i 1 i 1 I ; i i ; 1 1 I 1 i 1 I 1 1 i I 1 f: . .'A' j~{T '3`~,~rt.-:-nom i„.,Ti.f r:sraw 7: µ y ..F T~, DATE: March 1986 CITY COUKIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager :A"CT: BID #9582 WATER SLIDE l RECQ0ME110ATIOM: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder, B.J. Park 6 Rec Products d.b.a. Slide-A-Ride, in the amount of $33,225.00 ($46,647.84 financed total price) including installation and delivery. SU MRi3Y: This bid is for the 48 month lease/purchase of a water slide to be installed at the iiunicipal Swimming Pool. BACKGROND: Tabulation Sheet PR0 MM, DEPARTMENTS OR 6JIOVPS AFFECTED: Parks and Recreation Swim Pool Operations FIVAi. IMPACT: This r4qu'ilition will be TuKded'fr$m'ABC* 'budget fund`s y` Account #E261-003-0062-9101 Recreation Special Fund. The lease purchase total price is 546447.84. Respec 11y Md: to V, Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Memo: Tom :1. Shaw, C. P,14. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: n flarshfi1, C.P~ M ~ts~hesl ` 1 1 ; I 9502 D. J. fq~m:" 13 J I? I l l IJ.- WO I ER C;l_ 1 UC i tlf 1lJC:iHI ! i (1. S , 1 £iE. T I)E: -A I fIPENU) 2''/10 96 is, F►~:,(;CJC~. I GAMl'-.8. I f'r1E)E: O(,AJ1I,)IJ r 0 I I i i #1 1 CSI Y I J.l'L.i l DI-5( RI I' I SUN VENDOR I VkrldJ->UR I VENDOR I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 Water' i No Did 1 I Ic> rai rJ I 2' ► 1ii<i, pi:► ; _ I I I I I 1 1 I Instal l atiaii I I i I I I I 6,8...►i,►,~iii , I i 1 I Frei qht I i I 11,625.00 I'I'atal MAtr-1 Qf1t F'Urchase I 1 I 3.3 I I 1 I r 1 I I I I I ; I 1.36 Month L Lase i I I 1, 214. 37 1 1 Month I I 1 I I i 43 'x`,57.:_:2 1 I I I I i .Eotal 1 I I I I I t I 1 40 Month (_eai~ e I I I 971.83 1 1 I 1 I ' Mor►t.h I J I I I I 469647.B4 I I I I I ITotal I I I I , I I I Deli vary I ( 1 30 Days I I I I I I 1 I :Fob E)er►t on 1 i i yaws 1 7%-W`7 ,.a r c s. 71 DATE: March 4, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AEPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SU&XCT: AID #9684' AUTOMOTIVE/INDUSTRIAL BATTERIES RECOMMTION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated Didder, Associated Battery Supply of Hurst. TX, for the evaluated low total of 4,030.83. For on estimated total not to exceed $12,000.00. SUWRY: The batteries are bid and evaluated on a 60 month high amp battery. The batteries are for replacement in our Motor Vehicle fleet and commercial use batteries. The bid is for a price each after applying tho bid discount, This bid may be extended after one year If agreed to by both parties at the same price, terms and conditions, BACKGRKW: Tabulation Sheet with evaluation PROWAns DEPARMUTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All departr"nts through Vehicle Maintenance ,~I l11. IIPAC Twe is no additional impact on the General Fund Respect I ly submitted: 00 w C'--~'~ Llo V. Harrell City manager Prepared by: Na John J, Marshall, C.P,11. 'Title: Purchasing Agent Approved: John J. Marshall. C.P.M. Tf(`' I I i I ! { 1 SIB 1 9581 { { I I I I I { 810 TITLE BATTERIES I ASSOCIATED I BRISCOE I SMS i RELIABLE ; CONTINENTAL I GOODYEAR I WAREHOUSE I OPENED 2118/86 2 P.R. I BATTERY I TIRE CO. I BATTERY 1 BATTERY CO, l BATTERIES I TIRE 4 I ,,ARTS ! ACCOUNT t 710-002-0580-5702 1 I { 1 I 1 BATIERY 1 I I I i l I I ; ..................I-------------I-°---..---._..I-------------I---° i I------------- I------.------I 1 1 QTY 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR ; --------1-------------------------I-------------I-------------I-------------I-------------I-------------I-------------l-------------I 1 1 (Group 24/60 No. 1 29,55 1 34.12 1 37,00 1 37,51 150/ 34,95 1 41,01 ; 42,95 1 7 ISroup 241160 No. 1 29.55 1 34.12 1 31,00 1 37.61 1501 34,95 1 41,01 1 42,95 1 3 1 l6roup 21/60 No, 1 35.50 1721 41.72 1 41.0 1 37.81 150/ 34,95 1 48.04 1 46,75 ; 4 1 16roup 27F/60 No, 1 35.50 1721 41,72 I 41,00 1 31.81 !501 34.95 1 48.04 1 46.95 1 5 1 IBroup 72-71/60 Mo, 1 32.85 1 34,12 1 31.95 170/ 37.81 150/ 35.95 1 43.53 1 44.95 1 6 1 Ito". 88124 No. 1 78.90 1 101,39 1 100100 1 100.94 1 89,95 1 110.66 1 118,95 I. I lEvaluate/ Total 1 4,030.83 1 41554.83 I 41799,16 1 41743,16 ; 51134.16 1 51538.50 1 51728,33 1 I I I I 1 I ! ! 1 l I i I I 1 1 I I l { I 1Av9 Monthly Replacement I I I I I 1 I I I I Cast 1 1.54 1 N. A. 1 1.83 1 1138 1 1.50 1 0.66 1 2111 1 I !Warranty 1 60 Mo./24 I 60 Mo./24 1 60 No,/24 1 24 No. ; 50 Mo./24 1 60 %,/24 1 64 Mo./24 I 1 1016count I 351/01P I FD/DP I List 1 40% 17600 1 1311509 1 No List I No List I I Ifree Replacement 1 90 Day 1 90 Day 1 ISO Day 1 90 Day 1 90 Day I 90 Day 1 90 Day I I lOolivery/F08 I Denton I Denton 1 Denton ! Denton 1 Denton 1 Denton 1 Denton I I ISrand I Power Pak ! Goodyear I Red Diamond ! Reliable I Continental I Goodyear I Not Given I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I ! , I 1 1 I ; 1 1 1 ! 1 ! I I I 1 ! 1 ! 1 l 1 I I 1 ! I I 1 1 l I ! i 1 1 1 I f 1 :-gg..;_ fxy4•ic7,11 i a ..=1 DATE: March 4, 1986 CITY C-MOCIL WW TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID 09686 15' HYDRAULIC MOWER lIIC ME.NQATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification, Watson Distributing Co., in the amount of $30,915.00. SUMM#RY: This bid is for the purchase of a 15' hydraulic powered mower for use by the Parks Department in the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities. The lessor price offered by Colonial Motors and Qoidwaites do not meet specifications in engine size, transmission requirements, cutting height and other miscellaneous areas. BXKGRM; Tabulation Sheet PNOBBAMS, DEPARYK TS OR GNDUPS AFFECTED: Parks and Recreation Department ~_FISCAL IKT: This-mower is -being funded as•a portion of the exist Ag' lease/purchase a,lreement. The rate is 7.39 APR with a 36 month payout. Res fully subs- ted: o Har 11 City Manager Prepared by: Name: Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: r - John J. Mtrshal l , C. P.11. k. 1 ! I I BID # 9 5 f36 1 L:C.)113113. aI I Wa%LSun 1 (301 dwo i ter:, ! 1tIE) fI'T'L.E: 1 ' Hydr•ALtlir.: HOW 0I 1 Mator° IDitestr ibutirty 1 of lv':as 1 OPENED 2--21.)- FJ6 "A OU p.m. I Cowpony I { 1 l C(-':fJL)N'I'# 10 i i -i iO3, 1) 0 6) 4 -l3 C)(3 I I I I ! 1 { I # I Q Y ( 17'1":.I1 liI .;JC;I c l T T UN I VENDDR 1 VENDOR I Vr, IDUR I I ! I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15F"'1' l lyi,.it---AUl i s llower 1 209 400. (ii) 1 310, 915. tj() I 19, o6g. no 1 1 1 I I 1 ! I Model I Jacubsr,,t I Howat I Excel I 1 I i I ! I 1 I DOI ivory I I ~Q day 1 10-20 day I 1 ! I I I i 1 I I ! I I DATE: March 4► 19$6 CITY LWACIL MOT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #9686 PAVEMENT MARKER RECWNVWTION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder Pave nark Corp., in the amount of $12,030.00 for the applicator and trailer, 6.5 tons of white marker. 3.5 tons of yellow marker at $7,905.50 plus 52,500.00 for glass beads and sealer. Total award $22,436.50. SU"RV: This bid is for the purchase of a pavement marking machine and associated supplies. This unit will be used to mark lanes, crosswalks and other traffic controls. BACXGROUND: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS, OEPARTWJITS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Traffic Control and Engineering ~F€SC . 1tB'AC3: 'Thi's uni t i s 'a Motor fool ' repi acameint' and wi 11 'be funded'"' - thru tiotor Pool Account /720-004-0020-8707 ($12,030.00). The supplies will be funded from 1985/36 budget funds for maintenance of streets account 0100-002-0012-8303. Restfully su fitted: o . Harrell City Manager P7 area ley: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: J hn J. Marshall, C.Q.M. ~lt5at i ~ . I I i BID # 5'500 I I DID f'ITLE. PAVEMENT IjAF~F:E,It ! I NAVE I OPENED 2-20-416 ~ f'. rel. I I HAR1' i ACCOUNT'# I l CURFF'. I I I I it I UT'Y I I I[ M J.)F ' i C R r, 11 ON I VE?dI>tJfi I VENDOR I _ 1 I I I 1 I 1 I averment Mao-k 1 iq I 1 1.21030. (10 ; I I App t i 1: or I i I I 1 I I I I I Tors I i I I I I 1 :3.5 Iycilluw markNrr Ton I I i I I I I I FUE1 I I Denton I I I I i I I i I I S I l i I I DATE: March 4, 1986 In COUKIL REPORT, TO: Maycr and Members of the City Council FNN: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SULIECT: BID 69589 REFUSE PACKER BODY REC~ATION We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder, Hartco Waste Systems, in the amount of $10,420.00. SUlM y: This bid is for the purchase of a 13 cubic yard refuse packer body to be mountitd on a 2 ton truck cab chassis. This unit w711 be used primarily for rural pickup in new annexed areas and for pickup of "missed" customers. B, gg@N=: Tabulation Sheet PROW M6 LVARTpEVS OF GOM AFFECTED: Solid Waste Collection FISCAL IMPACT: This unit is to be funded as a portion of the lease/purchase agreement approved by Council on Did #9549, Res tfully su fitted: U, L1 V. Harrell City Manager Prepare d by: Nam Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: a. t Y R J. FMn6411.21 C.F.R. .ft I 1 I t SID 4 9589 I I I I SID TITLE REFUSE PACKER BODY I MARTCO 1 DUNCAN i DASIC I OPENED 2120/86 2 P.M, 1 WASTE 1 EQUIPMENT I WASTE 1 ACCOUNT11 630-002-0801-9142 I SYSTEM i 114C. 1 SYSTEMS I I----------.--- I------------- I-------------I t 1 QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I I------- -i------------------------- I---------•---- I------------- I-------------I I 1 i I i I 1 I 1 113 Cu, Yd Side Loading 1 10,420,00 1 l1a Sid 1 No Sid I 1 ;Rufus# Packer I I 1 I I I 1 1 I i 1 I 1 i I i t0elivery 1 45 Dayu 1 1 i I I I 1 I I t 1 i I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 i ' 1 1 ' I I I 1 1 I I I I i i 1 I 1 I I I 1 I r I I 1 i i i I I t r ; 1 1 I 1 I r I I i I I I 1 I I 1 3 I I 1 r 1 i i i 1 I 1 I I I i I i I i 1 I I 1 i I I I I I 1 I I i I I 3 1 r I 1 I i I I I i 1 I I I l 1 I I ,~y~?♦x';g.~~ DATE: Narch 4. 1986 CITY CtWIL 1lEPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council FRDN: Lloyd V. Harrell. City Manager SUBACT: BID #9590 POLICE SEDANS IIECtiaENOULTVN: We reco+s w4 this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder. Bill Utter Ford, in the amount of #11.148.07 each for nine (9) police sedans. Total award ;102,672.63. SUIWV: This bid is for the purchase of nine (9) police sedans. These units along with the three additional units purchased earlier will make up the 12 units approved for the "police take home program." BACAVOM: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS, DEPARTNWS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Police Department and Rotor Pool FISCAL, IMPACT: These units will be funded thru an addendum to the existing lease/purchase agreement at the rate of 7.39% APR for a 36 month payout period. 4VRespe ful ly submitted: . Harrell City Manager P red by: <ZA Name: Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.H. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved : J;6 J. 1hreba11. C.P.M. titit . . BT D # 9590 { H.f1) TITLE POLICE SEDF)Oti 1 , DILL I IRIANC3l..E= I DAVE ' f:IPE:NE'D 2/25/86 2 f='. 1•1. 1 UI TER { CHEVROLET i S ACCOUNT# I F OR D i I:.F2AUE DODGE ; ' I ' i # I [J'i',' 1 iTEN Df.-.Sv Ir'TIC)N VENDOR I VENDOR { VENDOR I I 1 1 1. ; 9 IF'nliz-r~ ~iC'lieil)5 I I,t,µgf?.7 1 12,`i 2.68 1 114699.00 i 1 I I 1 I ~ ; 1 1 I I Del i very 1 60-91) D Ry!s { 9() Pa f '-0- I Pays 124 I)ay5 , 1 I I 1 I I 1 { ~ I { I 1 t-y is.=+~,d NO. AN ORDLMANCE PROVIDING FOR THE 6XPUD3TURg or FUNDS FOR OWAGENCY PORCMSSB Or HATERIALS, EQUIPHANT, SUPPLIRS OR SERVICES IM ACCORDAIICR WITH THE PROVISUM Or STATS LAW EMPTING SUCK PURCHASES FRAM REMUM40TO Or C01lP9TITIV1 BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AM Qrrr=zv6 DATTEE. WHERW, state law and ordinance require that certain contracts requir an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding 00000 be by competitive bids, .scept in the case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citisens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health, of the citizens of the cityr or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and WHERJW 0 Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Ci)uocil approve all expenditures of sore than $10,000; and WH ERZAS, Sect:ion 2.09 of the City Charrer requires that every act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the aoatre,ttiag of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THERZF01a, TLL COUNCIL Or THE CITY Or DE!l70N !HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public calamity that sakes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the ;property of the city, or to protect the publia health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for uaforseen damage to public ~~roperty, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase orders" attached Hereto, are hereby approved: i URCHASE ORDEK NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT 72212 FaUl ont CA ~12. .Qa sic -lon I2. That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the materials, equipsm nt, supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts therein sated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with ~:ks provisions of state law exempting such puraha"i by the City from the requirements of competitive bids. SECTION 149 That because of such eeergeocy ► the City Manager or designated *&ployee is hereby authorised to purchase the materials,, *quipeeats supplies or services as described in the attached purchase orders and to oaks payment therefore in the amounts therein stated,, such emergency purabeaes beiag in accordance with the provisions of state law examptiai such purchases by the City from tM requirements of aoepatitive bids. Sacruml lize That this ordinance shall become effective immediately u~an its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ._..4 day of m._~ 1986. CITY 01 DLNTOKj TEXAS ATTEST: mmm" XEM CITY 39 CITY OE DEMON,,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHv CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS BY: r WWI 17, DATE: March 4. 1986 CITY CONCIL REMIRT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FWM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #72232 T.K.O. EQUIPMENT CO. $129000.00 REC01lE1MMTIOM: We recommend this purchase order be approved for the rent of one 16 yard scraper and one c actor roller to be used in the excavation and lining of landfall refuse disposal cells. We also reconmend the Purchasing A6ent be authorized to extend the agrm*m t for one additional month at the same rate, SUM MY: In an attempt to better utilize rapidly diminishing landfill development bond funds. 'Ile Solid Waste Department has chosen to replace the excavation contractor with our own personnel and this rented equipatent for a 60 day period. We are attempting to determine the least expensive method of landfill development. : Wemo from Charlie Watkins to Tom Shaw PMXRAIT15. DEPARTIEIlT$ OR 610QUP5 AFFECTED: Solid Waste Landfill Operations FISCAL IMPACT: Landfill Development Bond Funds Account #631-002-0803-8502 4VRespec fu l y submitted: . Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Man : Tom D. Shaw. C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved! C~ 901.6 TEXAS STREET ~lli~ I DENTION, TX 76201 P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VEtQNQ, pp~ 79.r'A2 02/ 4 6 t_ANOff UMENT TYP TTT64600 VENDOR SHIP To, T.K.C. ScuTS pelwY CR. P.u. l11)x 153399 111ViN S fiK 730tS1 Of YI,; ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN' 01 631 002 0803 8502 1 615 SCRAPER 7.5CC.C 02 631 002 0803 4502 1 015 COMPACTOR M/8HEEPSr40T 4*SC0.0 03 631 002 C80J 9502 ROLLER .)4 631 002 0803 8542 LEASE PCA JAW MONTHS aft The City of Denton, Texas is tax exempt • House Bill No. 29. OT .O. t2•G00.C ieference P. 0. Number on all B / L, Shipments and Invoices. Ih ments are F. 0. B. City of Denton, or as indicated. By Send Invoices TO: Direct Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payale John J. Marshal It C. P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. kKhmey St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D. Shaw, C. P. M. Asst, Purchasing Agent (or as Indicated on Purchase Order) 817/566-b311 D/F'w Metro 257-0042 The City *f Denton Is an equal opportunity employer ,z r"q - 'Y a=i xa` 7m a " x .3 ..g ,9 r.s= ,.7x'+9 s+~ rtj . March 4, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT Consider Easement Abandonment (Southridge Village Shopping Center and J. W. Erwin Replat), RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of 2/20/86 recommended to the Council approval of subject ordinance to abandon subject utility easements. This item was also reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting of 2/26/86. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND Easements No. 1, 2 4 3 were assigned to City of Denton from Texas Fower 8 Light Co. These easements are no longer needed since the property has been platted. Basement No. 4 crosser, the J.W. Erwin replat property. The plat dedicated an easement. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Denton Municipal Utilities, Texas Power and Light Company, Legal Dept. FISCAL IMPACT not applicable Respe tfully Submitted/, Prepared by: 7A A Roger Wilkinson y a F1 I , Manager Right-of-Way Agent APP 0~D:n R E. eo Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Proposed Ordinance II Location Map III Minutes PUB Meeting of 2/20/86 IV Memo- PSZ Commission 4186U:3 f ' 1303L 140. AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EIECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas has determtaed that the hereinafter described utility easements are no longer needed for public use; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Texas Revised Civil Statutes, Article 542le-12, on appraisal of the fair market value of said easements has been obtained; and WHEREAS, in accordance with state law, said easements are being abandoned and vacated in consideration of the receipt of their fair market value by the abuttns property owner thereof; NOM, THExkXUX9 * THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the hereinafter described easements are abandoned and vacated as easements for public utilities: 1. Easement from R. G. Collier to Texas Power and Light Company of Dallas, Texas, dated June 10, 1949, and recorded in Volume 355, P&#* 67 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and being that same easement assigned by Texas Power and Light Cowponyy to the City of Denton, Texas, by instrument dated May 1I, 1972, recorded in Volume 1140, Pass 7680 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas. Y.. 2. Easement deed from J. Homer Kerley to Texas Power and Light Companyy dated June 26, 1959, recorded in Volume 448, Page 444, of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texas, and being that same easement assigned by Texas Power and Light Company to the City of Denton, Texas, by instrument dated May 11, 1972, recorded in Volume 1740, Page 768, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas. 3. Easement from Homer Kerley to Texas Power and Light Company, dated June 27, 1961, recorded in Volume 4720 Page 593, of the Deed Records of Denton County, 'taxes, and being that some easement assigned by Texas Power and Light Company to the City of Denton, Texas by instrument dated May 11, 1972 recorded in Volume 1746, Page 768, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas. 1.-• 4. That portion of an easement as described in that certain deed from Shade E. Erwin to the City of Denton, Texas, dated March 3, 1959, recorded in Volume 445, Page 1379 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, which lays within the boundary of Lot 2R, of the J. W. Erwin Subdivision plat or replat, filed on May 100 1985, recorded in Cabinet E, Page 96, of the plat records of Denton County, Taxes. a a • SECTION It. That said ease"nts are herein abandoned and vacated, and by operation of lax, the City of Denton's property interest in said saaements shall revert to the abutting property owner, whothcr one or more, and the City of Denton hereby releases any and all claims to the use of the property described in said easements referenced hernia for the purposes therein described. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ► 1986. itICHAM MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APP1tOVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS . Qp 5 l / F { 4 ti ~ , ~allrrrtf.b + ENTON -W we's 10 A Z.6 3B 01 1 sJ~, 30 'r ^ f I A r ► 510 vs • FOIIIr i 079 03 Voyflill 0 \`rJ~ ~ ~OTrT~r~ly / C GOP& ;i r• 1111 r. \ 1 10 11 P I 4 • ~~s~` Pockrus RC = a: I S.. ' . S°~ Al 1 .r M SHADY I f-. i. i 5,~+. SNORES' a ' Pop ~ . SUAS "d A , CORINTH' Pik If7 • M 00/ 4 f `k~ • . 1~11ot<11y, t.►aa1 A1• . • rl j rul0^ 00 ^ • p • a • • .~7+ a • /Old 10, 49 ' mac, ' - / • f L.xv Mly~ d Est • A,i » r µ .~I Fit ~ • ~ R... , ras ~~y HICKORY +.w w -v. T, a F; °i ai )W.~G •Y:'.. .y.f a:.;~y. FF,'< T] aFfpv-} T.. v.)t_ EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES February 20, 198(1 a. CONSIDER EASEMENT ABANDONMENT (SOUTHRIUGE VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER' AW070` . 'ERWIAEr . Tuilos explained that Athe Staff recommends the Board recommend to thq City Council approval of ordinance to abandon subject urility easements, Easements No. 1, 2 A 3 were assigned to City of Denton from Texas Power & Light Co. These easements are nto 'anger needed since the property has been platted. Easement No. 4 crosses the J.W. Erwin roplat property. The plat dedicated an easement. Frady motion, Thompson second, to eo prove the easement abandonment. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. i i_ P 4 Z Minutes February 26, 1986 B. Recommend approval of an ordinance abandoning and vacating certain utility easements as described herein; and declar- ~~.P T ) ing an effective date, (Southridge Village Shopping Center and J. W. Brwin Addition) S'TAF'P REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the Development Review Committee and the Public Utility Board recommended approval. She added that the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission will `)e forwarded to the City Council on March 4, 1986. DECISION: Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of an ordi- nance abandoning a;id vacating certain utility easements as described herein; and declaring an effective date. (South- ridge Village Shopping Center and J. 111, Erwin Addition) Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (4-0). March 4, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT Consider Basement Abandonment (Al McNatt Property). RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of 2/20/86 recommended to the Council Council approval of subjects ordinance to abandon subject utility easemont. This item was also reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting of 2/26/86. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND This )asement is not being used at this time, or with no plans in the future. At the time the property is platted and developed, any easements necessary will be required. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Denton Municipal Utilities, Texas Power and Light Company, Legal Dept. FISCAL IMPACT Not applicable Prepared by; Resp ctfully Su fitted, Roger Wilkinson o r e , y anager Right-o£-Way Agent APPROVED: R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Ordinance II Location Map III Minutes PUB Meeting of 2/20/86 IV Memo- P4Z Commission 4196U:4 xc t... ~ . a .+s },z, K~"h."Y7z.i f ~ 1313E r'. •1-^leR' { y y ws{++ s. ~ra*Y.~y '.crfrt l :'~,''-Riy NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ABANDOjjING AND VACATING A CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENT AS oCSCRiBF.o HEREIN; At`1D DECLARIdG AN EFFECTIVE DATE. determined bthate the thereinafter describes tilityteasement sishno longer needed for public use; and Civilil WHEREAS, i accordance with the provisions of Texas Revised market value of said easement has bean obtained; and being aE bandon d accordance vacated with state low, consideration of said receipt of its fair market value by the abutting property owner thereof; NOM, THEREFORE, THE t,,-UNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the hereinafter described easement is abandoned and vacated as an easement for public utilities: Easement from Richard H. Taliaferro and Norma Berry Taliaferro to the City of Denton, Texas, dated August 22 1973 and recorded in Volume 684, Page 228 of tiie Dead Records of Denton County, Texas. SECTI01J II. That said easement is herein abandoned and vacated, and by operation of law, the City of Denton's property interest in said masasunt shah revert to tt~ys gbu ing property owner, whether oqs or more ad the'"CiC o o% M ruby release any and all r, c}~iq<s to th use of the pprop j!"'described is said easement frrfaQcad hopth for the p Fposes thtsu~n desari 'ed. , ON I'll. * ?pajta ordinance sh411 becoms' effective immediately upon its paaaand approval. PARSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN CrTY-MCREMY CITY OF DENTON,,TUAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY Of DSNTON, MAS ,Y, vyue Wkw Y I a H ti old Old E N TON ~r Ts A . ' • • • ) t Caop~. _ I s.~ ~ C tt ~fA f r R ~ M L 40 •t J ` ti I U. J 1 - ~r 1 1 ~ ~ • 1 I~ 99 t9 i ° 1 s ~Fosfsr ES or 4: * t. ~'g * 03 • C ' ` •.'~ir~ ~ vpmrnunlty C c 50 ate. r, ~ +Rr+••~ ti+, ~ ~ ; P I • R 1 / * y d 1 Pockru SHADY r - :Il~ ~y 10 !;~40PES g oyg~C/~Allld ' • f Lses too r Rrss A . OQRIN'/H pop 4)1 • ✓ 1 nob "MA& 0 00 /04 d 'A as 1 0, • ~ • .A ~r / ~ ~ ~r r r rr * ~ 1~. f ~!!r~ s~''y.•,•... ~ ~ , ~>AS a ~ ~ M/i~GK4RY r f • ~ • 'i~ ~ / ' ~ ..M 4 arc .fi s a r. ry.ii IF.Sr sr" '°€4." "e _+f 1 7130 EXCERPT PUBLIC 'JTILITIES BOARD MINUTES February 2U, 1966 CON54_DER EASEMENT ABANDONMENT (AL MCNATT PROPERTY) Tullos expiainod that the Utility Staff recommends the board recommend to the City Council approval of ordinance to abandon subject utility easement. This easement is not being used at this time, or with no plans in the future. At the time the property is platted and developed, any easements necessary will be required. Boyd motion, Frady second, to approve the easement abandon- ment. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. _i x '.-•..~.,:~°P..r•iY '1, .ewe`. a, P Z Minutes February 26, 1986 C, Recorunend approval of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, abandoning and vacating a certain utility easement as described herein; and declaring an effective date. (Al McNatt Property) STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the Development Review omm -ttee and the Public Utility Board recommended approval. She added that the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission will be forwarded to the City Council on March 4, 1986. DECISION: Mr. Escue moved to recommend approval of an ordinance or the Uity of Denton, Texas, abandoning and vacating a certain utility easement as described herein; and declaring an effective date. (Al McNatt Property) Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unani- mousl,• carried (4-0). i . ..y-yi~a _pmot9, tom.. . F°:, ' f ? w _ _ ^t xx ea.i . er AIL. TOt wor and Members of the City Council M MI Lloyd Harrell, City Maaapr SUMOTi ADOPTION OP AN ORDtN4C2 AND SRRVICN PLAN ANNIZINO 765.1 ACRNS SMATND IM To K.N.P. A P.R.R. SQRMt ABSTRACT 1470; TO N.r. ANANNSON SQRVU, ADNTRACT 16; "it N.A. ORR SURVNY, AW"ACT 453; THR O.Y. AND90011 SURMO ASSSrACT 12; TO X.R.P. i P.R.R. SQIMv ABSTRACT 1502; AND THN T A P $VIM, ABSTRACT 1302, D*MTOM COUNTY, TIM ; BRIT. PART OF A TRACT klWV AS THR GOLDIN HOOP RANCR AND BNOINNINO SOUTH of Q.S. HIM&T 35 o U32 or P.M. 1569 AND YRST or MOAN ROAD (A-32) Q?t.QV: The planning and Zoning Comission recommends approval. : this is a voluntary annexation request by Killer of Texas, inc. The purpose of the annexation is to seek zoning. The site is located approxisately 11,000 feet or roughly 2 stiles northwest of the exist- ing rumW of the Denton Municipal Airport. The site is on the fringe of the general area controlled by the Airport Zoning Act, but outside of the area ocntrolled by the Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations. A conceptual develops►snt plan is attached, but a forral petition for zoning has not been mad*. PROGRAW. DRPAa!!U<NTS OR GROQPS AP1 MDt There are no existing structures, residences or population included in the area proposed for annexation. ►n$CAL WPACT: Undsterained Res tfur su tted: Prepnrsd by: L1 d roll Awv. City Manager Dsyid 912ison Senior Planner t Jeff Director of planniat and Derr lopzw►nt 1049s L . L- s c 1210L N0. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO WE CITY OF DKNTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LARD CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 765.1 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND TIEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BRING PART OF THE E. A. ORR SURVEY, AISTIMCT NO. 983; THE T i P RAILROAD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1302; US MEP i PRA CO. SURVV0 ABSTRACT NUMBER 1470; THE MEP 6 PRA CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1502; THE R. F. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 164 AND THE G. W. ANDMSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 12, DENTON COUN'T'Y TEW; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTB.ICT PROPERTY; 1MD DECLAAING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and WHEREAS an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the day of , 1985 in the Council Chambers for SIT interests persons o state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexatiou provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the day of , 1986 in the Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Taxes, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; ;MOW, TH16P.EF "o THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D040 HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Cho hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a art of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other citisens of said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of aaid City now in effect or which may hereafter be orActed aad the property situated therain shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as follows, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of lard aituatod in the E.A. Orr Surrey Abstract Number 983; the Th? Railroad Survey, Abstract Number 1302; the MEP to PRE. Co. Survey, abstract Number 1470; The MEP i PAR Co. Survey, Abstract No. 1502; the S.F. Anderion Survey, Abstract go. 16; and the G.W. Anderson Survey, Abstract Number 12, and beiag sore particularly described as follows: 320110MIC at a point in the present city limits as astabliawed by Ordinance No. 74-36, Tract V, said point ly14S at the inrersectioa of the West boundary line of said Tract V w th the South rigm-of-Way! line of state Highway u.8. 380; Ab32/9I14= OF TEM/PAGE OIR yx;y, yam,,, A i..-'40 t~?__ y Es, ~ S~ ~ Fj, a! :';![a '~ir'f T t,~~" RE ~Y 3`, a . xl n ~ e s~ x ' :•"3:. s . r ^~'i; xa-y r1 77! tn7 . . THEM South V 34' 44" Kest, along said present city limits, a distance of 450 feet to a point for a corner, THENCE South 83' 05' 16" East, Along said present city limits, a distance of 3,284 fast to the beginning of a curve to the left with a radius of 11,95.16 feet, a central angle of 20 39' 04" and a chord of South 84" 26' 41" Last, 553.31 feet; THZKCZT Easterly along said curve and city limits, an are distance of 553.36 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South 000 10' 27" West along and near a fence a distance of 10886.11 feet to a steel pin at a fence corner; TRUICE South 890 59' 47" East with a fence a distance of 1,174.8 feet to a steel pin in Egan Road; THENCE South 09' 03' 21" East with said Egan Roat a distance of 10400.0 foot to a steel pin at the intersection of Egan Road with Jim Christal Road, also being on the South line of said E.A. Orr Survey; THENCE North 890 55' 00" West with said Jim Christal Road and with the South line of said E.A. Orr and UP Railroad Surveys a distance (i£ 3,941.44 foot to a steel pin for corner; THENCE North 00° 05' 00" East a distance of 1,550.0 feet to a steel pin for corner; THENCE North 890 55' 00" West a distance )f 1,405.16 feet ::o a steel pin for comer; THENCE South 0010 05' 00" West a distance of 1,550.0 feet to a steal pin on the South line of said TO Railroad Survey and in Jim Christal Road; THENCE North 890 55' 00" West with said Jim Christal Road and with the South line of said TLP Railroad Survey and South line of said MEP i PAR Co. Survey, Abstract Number 1470 part of tho way a distance of 3,184.5 foot to a steel pin in the intersection of Jim Christal Road and Nail Road; THENCE Lorth 810 37' 14" West with said Jim Christal Road a distance of 901.0 foot to a steal pin for corner; THUMB North 780 12' 00" West with said Jim Christal Road a distance of 1,144.02 feet to a steel pin on a West line of said MEP i PRR ^.o. Survey, Abstract Number 1502 also being the East line of P.A. Collins Survey, Abstract No. 356; THENCE Morth 000 02' 13" East with said survey line and with a fence a distance of 353.5 feet to a fence corner at the North- east corner of said Collins Survey; THENCE North 880 57' 59" West with a South line of said MEP i PRR Co. Survey, Abstract. number 1502 and the South line of said Anderson Survey and with a fence A distance of 1,510.16 feet to a fenoo corner post on the southeast right-of-way of A.T. i S.Y. Railroad, and being 75.0 fast from the center of said railroad; THOM North 230 32' 21" East with said railroad right-ofway a dies a of 1,073.73 feet t,, a steel pin for corner; A-32/MILLU Of TUAS/PAGZ TWO a t .y~ _ n •~~Y a-r.~~. _y'. ,L''f.~ - r.'~A::. 'k- ,Rr„'~y~. 4 -,•-4{ .y.. ,y~.~ t _ ,e ~qna THENCE North 61° 01' 39" West with said railroad right-ofway a distance of 25.0 f.at to a steel pin, which is 50.0 feet from the center of said railroad; THENCE North 28° 52' 21" East with said railroad right-of-way a distance of 840.0 feet to a steel pin for corner; THENCE North 89° 32' 20" East along and near a fenc2 a distance of 2682.85 feet to a steel pin in Nail Road, also being on the East line of said Anderson Survey, and a West line of said MEP & PRR Co. Survey, Abstract No. 1470; THENCE North 00" 11' 16" West with said Nail Road and with the East line of said Anderson Survey which is a West line of said MEP & PRR Co. Survey distance of 400.01 feet to a steel pin at a bend in said road and being the Northoca t corner cf said Anderson Survey; THENCE North 89° 48' 44" East with said Nail Road and with a North line of said MEP & PRR Co. Survey a distance of 197.2 feet to a steel pin in a bend of said Nail Road also being the Southeast corner of U. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 14 also being an inner corner of said HE? & PRR Co. Survey, Abstract Nu..ber 1470; THENCE North 00° 11' 16" West with i West 1tnR of said MEP & PRR Co. Survey and with Nail Road a distance of 1,675.2 feet to point for a corner; THENCE South 83° 05' 16" East along the South right-of-way lime of said U.S. 380 a distance of 3,153.47 feet to the place of beginning and containing 765.1 acres of land more or less. SECTION II. The above described, property is hereby classified as Agricule%,-*al "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning iA4 of th. City of Denton, Taxas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION III. Should any section or part of this ordinance be held unconstituti:~aai, illegal or invalid, or the application thereof ineffective or inapplicable as to any territory, such unconsti- tutionality, illegality, invalidity or ineffectiveness of such section or part shall in no wise affect, impair or invalidate the remaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such remaining portion or portions, she same shall be and remain in full force Knd effect; and should this ordinance for any reason be ineffective as to any part of the area hereby annexed to the City of Denton, such ineffectiveness of this ordiaance as to any such part or parts of any such area shall not affect the effectiveness of this ordinance as to all of the reasinder of such area,.and the City Council hereby declares ,tt to be ita purpose to annex to the City of Denton every part of the area described in Section I of this ordinance, roSardlese of whether any other part of such described area is hereby effectively annexed to the City. Provided, further, that If there included within the general description of territory set out in Sect<~)n I of this Ordinance to be hereby annexed to the City of Denton any lands or area which are presently part of and included within the liaLts of the City of Denton, or which are A-32/MILLM OF TtX lS/PAGZ TM1 F~.a, ~ r ' a':P fr -o~a~x+.';si. ~S°-" -g.:-r +A..c i , a = 1, i!r:. ~'ti ~ .x" , y~ . y - 'y, , > pr"oatly part of and included within the Units of any other City. Town or Villass, or which are not within the City of Denton 's urisdictloa to anwx, the saw is hereby excluded and excepts ton the territory to be hereby annexed as fully as if such excluded and excepted area were expressly described herein. SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective issediateiy upon its Passase. Introduced before the City Council on the day of 1986. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of 1986. CITY Of DEMON, TIJUS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON,,T€XAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEMON, TUAS BY: A-32/WUM O! TWAS/!'AU PM T''+78~NT.~~"nrataar.ra.....-a..s.:......aw..+....a........~,...~.-m.--..--••~...~..-•----•-.._~ ..v..._. w , PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970& as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an ;,rea which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed, annexation. NOWO THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: I. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on 'Zhe effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and oth6 traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and, equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation, C. Water (1) mater for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09., of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D, Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 'C09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. ' rw v. a...a WrY.uM ai~... wrv r'.w%. e.4w ..\i ...i l... .I '4.ylYMw4~~ir••. } Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes. measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will beg+.n in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planniu3 and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area, I. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city. J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present.city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installecl, within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation, II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is u;~- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide. lines as; (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics, The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP plannJug year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. oC KRUM J ''OP a s o lvVT)l , ~oclclc ~ 'v Q. \ I~ • now I to . . . . ,~.•r'r'. ,~r~ • r ./nti~ •i i r•~j' r.r ; •.'•'r ',:r r,. rr; r, r'r, r,.~ r'r ,r•• . .'r'✓r•r'' •,r . Tfr;r • r r r• 'r r, r, •'r r .fir'. r. r,. . . . . . r r . . . r r r ,r,., r,r,r,r r r r r • '~'r'r'r•r•r•r'r'r'r•r r,r r to c I r r r r r r r r r r r r r IT r O•S . ~a Tom 'Col • e>~ Rd. °C ISM 41111111, Amyx Rd. • V P $ Z Minutes , January 22, 1986 Page 14 D. A-32. Proposed annexation of approximately 765,1 acres s tuated in the M.E.P. $ P,R.R. Survey, Abstract 1470; the E.F. Anderson Survey, Abstract 16; the E.A. Orr Sur- vey, Abstract 983; the G.W. Anderson Survey, Abstract 1Z; the M.E.P. 8 P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 1502; and the T$P Survey, Abstract 1302, Denton County, Texas; being part of a tract known as the Golden Hoof Ranch and beginning south of U.S. Highway 380, east of FM 1S6, and west of Egan Road. STAFF REPORT; Mr. Ellison said that this is a voluntary annexation request by Miller of Texas, Inc, The purpose of the annexation is t~'l seek zoning. The site is located approximately 11,000 feet or roughly 2 miles northwest of the existing runway of the Denton Municipal Airport, The site is on the fringe of the general area controlled by the Airport Zoning Act, but outside of the area controlled by the Municipal Airport Zoning Regulations, A conceptual development plan was included with the request for annexa- tion but a formal petition for zoning has not been made. There are no existing structures, residences or population included in the area proposed for annexation, Mr, Ellison stated that between 1-1-85 and 1-1-86 there was 1341.28 acres annexed by the City of Denton. He said that 405,84 acres were annexed involuntary and the balance by voluntary requests. He said as of 1-1-86 there are approximately 45.50 square miles of city limits and this is a 4.82% increase in square miles over a year period. He said that the City Council took action on 6 more annex- ations the night before. He said there is one annexation request per week, He said there is much speculation and that are a trend on the uprise, DECISION: Mr. Escue moved to recommend approval of pro- posed annexation of approximately 765,1 acres situated in the M,E,P. $ P.R.R, Survey, Abstract 1470; the E,F, Anderson Survey, Abstract 16; the E.A, Orr Survey, Ab- stract 983; the G.W. Anderson Survey, Abstract 12; the M,E.P, $ P.R.R. Survey, Abstract 1502; and the T $ P Survey, Abstract 1302, Denton County, Texas; being part of a tract known as the Golden Hoof Ranch and beginning south of U.S, Highway 380, east of FM 156, and west of Egan Road, Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (4-0), R. SELECTION OF FOUR MEMBERS of the Planning and Zoning aim ss on to serve on a Land Use Planning Committee, After a brief discussion, Euline Brock, Bill Claiborne, R. B. Escue, and Gary Juren volunteered to serve on the Land Use Planning Committee. Meeting adjourned 8:50 p.m, i x~ A-32 ANNEXATIUR SCHEDULE NovM,nner 26, 1985 Submit City Couj'cil agenda item Novemoor 27, 1965 Submit .ity Council agenda oacx-up uecomoer 3, 1985 City Council sets Uate, time and place for puolic nearing Ueeemoer 4, 1985 L'40tlca to Denton Record Cnronicle v Decemoer 6, 1945 Pu;alisn notice anti indilout v Decemoer 91 1985 summit City Council agenda item ,,~--Deceinoer lU, 19d5 suwmit city council agenda hack-up L-~Decelnoer 170 1983 City Council nolds first puolic nearing 4.-'/Decemoer 2U, 19d7 Notice to De,titon Record Cnronicle r/ Decemuer 27, i9d5 ouolisn notice and mailout eamoer 3U, 1965 Submit City council agenda item e/ueceinoer .311 1985 Submit City Council agenda OaCK-up 'r* January 7, 19d6 Clty Council nolds second public nearing ,i January 13, 1986 Submit City Council agenda item ✓'January 14, 1986 Suoinit City Council agenda aacK-up January 21, 19d6 City Council adopts ordinance and service plan instituting annexation proceedings L/ January 24, 1466 Urdinance to Dentun Record Chronicle 4/~January 26, 1946 puolisn ordinance cv' Feoruary l51 1966 Suo,nit City Council agenda item l,,-'Feuruary 26, 19d6 Submit City Council agenda uacx-up * Oarca 4, 1936 Adoption of final annexatiun ordinaace and service plan oy City Council * Denotes action oy the City Council U964g i , DATE: 03/04/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Meaabera of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AND SERVICE PLAN INSTITUTING ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 614.6 ACRES BEGINNING NORTH OF OLD ALTON ESTATES, SOUTH OF RYAN ROADO WEST OF FM 2181, AND EAST OF THE G.C. i S.F. RAILROAD AND SITUATED IN PART OF THE E. PICKETT SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1018, THE N. BRITTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 510 THE J, ROTERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1084, THE J. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1085, AND THE B. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1102 (A-30). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. SUMMARY: This is a 614 acre request with existing development ranging from scattered low density residential and agricultural to heavy commercial. The bulk of the area is undeveloped. The annexation request is voluntary on an approximately 21b acre portion and tho balance is proposed by the City of Denton. BACKGROUND: Staff informed the City Council of the need to consider annexation f of additional property in this area when annexation of 117 acres along the south aide of Hickory Creek Road was being considered. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Star C Ranch, a boat storage/abandoned vehicle/recreational vehicle storage business along Ryan Road, approximately four single family dwellings, are within the proposed annexation between Hickory Creek Road (north side) and Ryan Road (south side). One single family residence along the south side of Hickory Creek Road appears to be included. The south half of a bridge reconstructed by the County approximately two years ago is included in the proposed annexation. Approximately 4,200 feet of both sides of FM 2181 extending south from Ryan Road is included. Approximately 1,050 feet of both sides of Ryan Road is included in the proposed annexation. Beginning at the intersection of Hickory Creek Road and Hwy. 2181, 2,30n feet of the north half of Hickory Creek Road is included in the proposed annexationt continuing 20630 feet, all of Hickory Creek Road is included) continuing another 430 feet, the south half of Hickory Creek Road is included. The south half of a bridge on Hickory Creek Road is included in the proposal. City Council Report format (A-30) March 4, 1966 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACTS Undetermined R s tfully a tteds G1 yd arrel City Manager Prepared by; ~~Vr~ David Ellison Senior Planner Appr ed Jeff Mey Director of Planning and Development 0052k/2 i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATEi March 4, 1986 SUBJECT; Adoption of an ordinance and service plan instituting annexation of approximately 614.6 acres beginning north of old Alton Estates, south of Ryan Road, west of FM 2181, and east of G.C.i S.F. Railroad (A-30). SUMMARYs Inquiries regarding the development process and requirements for property along Hickory Creek Road persisted at a rate faster or as fast as any area of the City and its ETJ during the latter stages of 1985. Preliminary plans for the 63 acre Dunton Manor Subdivision prompted annexaticn of 117 acres along the south side of Hickory Road (A-27). The Dunton Manor project has not developed, but interest in this area continues. Richard Compton and Button-Ziff Properties, owners of approximately 80 and 75 acres, respectively, have petitioned for annexation. The City of Denton is the petitioner on the balance of the property. Both petitioners own property along the north side of Hickory Creek Road. Both either have or will petition for planned development (PD). A 217 acre tract south of Hickory Creek Road beginning adjacent and west of the recently annexed 117 acres has also been the subject of development inquiries. The Mayor has agreed to voluntary annexation of his 58.2 acres along the west side of R.M. 2181. Richard Compton has advised staff of information reportedly given to him by Acne Brick Company indicating that excavation work will begin or be intensified in the near future on 80 acres between Ryan Road and Hickory Creek Road. Annexation of the 614 acres in this request would form a logical boundary and extension of the city limits into an area seemingly in need of greater land use control, particularly, given its relatively close distance from existing city limits and existing City utilities. ACTION REQUIRED; Adoption of ordinance. RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ATTACHMENT: Map David Ellison Senior Planner 0052k/l .Scar""'a~~; , 'c. _ . •.,..a-~ ,.r.:- 1 ' - . ~TL NO. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 614.6 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE E. PICKETT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1018; THE N. BRITTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 51; THE J. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1084; THE J. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1085; AND THE 8. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1101, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SANE AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPL•RTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a request for annexation for the property described in Exhibit "A", a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the day of , 1986 in the Council Chambers for all-interested persona to a ate their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the day of , 1986 in the Council Chambers for all-in-fsrested persona to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective data, and after the public hearings; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the tract of land described in said Exhibit "A" be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a art of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in affect or which wayy hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein ■hall be subject to and shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by the City. SECTION II. The property described in Exhibit "A" is hereby classified as Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION I11. Should any section or part of this ordinance be held unconstitutioncl, illegal or invalid, or the application thereof ineffective or inapplicable as to any territory, such unconsti- tutionality, illegality, invalidity or inaffectiveneas of such A-30/COMPTON-BUTTON-ZIFF/PAGE ONE TT . section or part shall in no wise affect, impair or invalidate the remaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such remaining portion or portions, the same shall be and remain in full force and effect; and should this ordinance for any reason be ineffective as to any part of the area hereby annexed to the City of Denton, such ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any such part or parts of any such area shall not affect the effectiveness of this ordinance as to all of the reminder of such area, and the City Council hereby declares it to be its purpose to annex to the City of Denton every part of the area described in said Exhibit "A" of this ordinance, regardless of whether any other part of such described area is hereby effectively annexed to the City, Provided further, that if there Is included within the general description of territory eat out in Section I of this Ordinance to be hereby annexed to the City of Denton any lands or area which are presently part of and included within the limits of the City of Denton, or which are presently part of and included within the limits of any other City, Tocm or Village, or which are not within the City of Denton's uriediction to annex, "he same is hereby excluded and excepted Irom the territory to be hereby annexed as fully as if such excluded and excepted area were expressly described herein, SECTION IV. This ordinnnce shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Introduced before the City Council on the day of , 1986. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of 1986. RICHARD 0. bTEWART; KAYM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: MaME ALLEN CITY SECK2TMY CITY OF DENTON,oTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LWAL FORM; DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY. ,(il) ti r/lG ~f (It.J r7;%/c A-30/COMPTON-BUTTON-ZIFF/PACE Two HICKORY CAM ROAD ANNIKATIOM December 120 1943 llfl.D NOTJS TO A-30 All that cartel" tract or pates, of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, I:tate of Texas and being part of the S. 9lakett survey, Abstract 1011, the N- Stitton aucvey, Abstract $1, the J, Rogers survey, Abstract 1011, the J, Rogers sutveyt Abstract 1015, and the S. Rogers survey, Abstract 1101 and note particularly described as follows, SCQINMINO at a point lying in the intersection of the west R.O.M, line of P.M, 7111 with the south boundary line of NiCkory Cro*4 Road, acid point also being the Northeast cornet of A 12 sere treat described in Ordinance No. IS-7311 TV90CE Melt along said present City limits end the South boundary line of said road a distance of 2621.66 loot to a point tot a Corner. TNRNCf South 00 62' $00 Most along laid present city limits and seat boundary line of laid I. Rogers survey same being the West boundary line of the S. Venter sueveyt Abstract 1.15, a distance of 123.20 feet to a point, 220 West along atf1160.6feet0 the'southwest corner atdlaid yi11Venterasurvoyo Abstract a1315 and continuing for a total distance of 1436.49 foot to a tense aornec, 64110 being the southeast cornet of said S. Rogers survey, and the Northeast corner of laid J, Rogers survey, Abstract 10191 TNSMCC South 010 43' Most along the tart boundary line of laid J, Rogers survey nose a twee, a distance of 1763.6 feet to a steel pin at the fast Northeast earner of tract r-994 acquired by the Uss, Government, TNRNCS North 310 16' West :Acng said U,S. line 700.0 feet to a concrete monument, TNRMCi worth 370 23' West along amid U,S, tine a distance of 1560.0 foot to a concrete monument in the Npr'•0, line of laid J. Rayers, Abstract 1015, also being the South boundary lin' ,I the S. Rogers survey, Abstract 11011 T12KI 044th 190 37' West passing at 347.19 toot the Southwest earner of amid S. Rorots surrey, same being the Southeast Corner of laid J. Rogers survey, Abstract 1044 continuing along the South boundary line of amid J. Rogers surrey MM W4 O.S. lime a total distance of 412.91 feet to a concrete menumont, TRIM worth 290 94' Mast along said U.N. boundary lint a distance of 1100.0 feet to a oodsroto mand"fitt TRIM North l0 21' Cast a distance of 1755.74 feet to point for a corner laid point lying to the North boundary L no of amid J, Rogers surrey, Abst act A-30/CONnw-8n?m-zi rr/PAaL on I ?Laid Notes to A-10 Decoftor 12, 1905 Page 2 of 2 1001, pals being the south boundwty line of said M. Stitt*" survey, Abstract 51, Said point oleo Sylnq in an east and Meat toad "0" as Hickory Crook good, TMENCY South s4o 05' East along Said survey lines in said Mickory Croak road, a distance Of 412.70 feat to a point for a cornet) THENCE North, along the Most boundary line of a 79 acts treat convayad Volt ve at •1 to C. 8. Compton by deed dated May 60 1946 and recorded in Val. 324 111 Page 112 of by in the Deed Eocords of Denton County, T*Koa, Passing At 1115.75 foot the Northwest Cornet said tract, iaaM being the Southwest Carnet of an 40 acts tract conveyed by Tad ASltson ae alt to Aome Stick Co. by deed dated ton 30. 1911 and hoarded in Vol. 501 Pqe 141 if the Deed ltooatda of Denton County, TOSKSS, and Continuing for a total distance of 2611.10 feet to a point for a corner, raw being the Motthwost eerMr of said Acre stick Co. tract and in the present city limit Tina as established by Ordinance No. 77-5) THENCE North 000 07' East along the North boundary lino Of sold Aare Stick tract And said pra amt city limits 4 distance of 7011.50 feet to a point for corner in the lost boundary line of the said M. 6rltton sutvey) THENCE North 10 24' west Along pceeent city liettar passing at 2367,0 feet the Northeast. cornet Of said M. acitton survey Soae bring the southeast cornet of the T. Labor survey,- Absttaot 779, for A total 41St4Ln4a Of 1607.2 feet to a point tot a *ornate "so being the Northeast corner of the aid T. Labor survey, aid point also lying in the present city limits 48 estabitow by Ordinance 75-111 TEEMCE North $90 10' 56• East Along Sold present city limits and the P,4cth te"adary )law of the 8. Pickett sut"y, Abstract 1018 a dtstamCo of 1026461 feet to a point tot a oornet, said point lying in the present city limits as astabliehed by Otdiaence Mo. W241 THENCE South 00 He 444 East, along said present cloy limits, a distance of 1102.04 feet to a point for a corner) TMEMCS North 090 $1' East along aid present city limit lint, passing at 1295.50 teat the Meat 1,049, line of P.M. Jl OistAaoe of 1389,08 feet to a point corner and continuing for s total eatabliahsd by Ordinance No. 45-43 t1tr sum beingnthe, seat E.)O.Mltiiaemofs as P.N. 21011 Tafte South 010 17' East ale Posid t city 1laite, sage being the last E.o,M# line of P,M. 1101 414ist of 1201.0 feet to a point) TSEMCe sath 10 17' East AID" 'Id p ent city limits, A distance of 960.0 feet to a point tot corner) + Too= Meet ale" said pceant y, 1 s 9S.0 fat to lace of containing 61400 acres more at p beginning and 000ld1 :y+`r A-30/C0WT0M-P!T'1l1M-Z1"/!'AaZ TW i% PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNE%EO AREA CITY OF DENTON TE ME= WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of s,n area which is bounded as shown on a map of than proposed annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970% as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: 1. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation;. (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and tr►►ffic standards. B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09;. of appendix A of the code of the 'City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- 7ided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. e...~-+.►-e.+rrw.`ter-ar-.'4..-,7.'.._ Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, constructign of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. G, Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area. I. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city. J, Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present. city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. •.wp#nq`.r~9°vs...~m....+..r~..~. +r:.rrr+~.wrs..v.r. .s-. cwt. .:....:x,ew:-f?rkc.r,~+':L+s~:ri~Rfra~?7iRdi'r[i..rwx,Wwae. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 8 months after the effective date of annexation. II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics, The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. J. CoM. d. 2101 r • 1... W2 i y • ; r I en* Lon a it, Ryon d. _ bin eon Ow In + + op • Al n ' Q► low • .t t` f1 I z t d ~A 1 o n r r rcf 830 • M l a' o . SIT P $ Z Minutes j February 12, 1986 F. A-30. Recommend approval of proposed annexation of approxi- mately 614.6 acres beginning north of 01.4 Alton Estates, south 'DR of Ryan Road, west of FM 2181, and east bf G.G. $ S.F. Railroad. STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that the roads included in this annexation would be maintained by the City. He said that staff recommends that the following at a minimum be annexed: (1) 175 acre voluntary portion petitioned by Richard Compton and R. J. Button; (2) 80 acre Acme Brick site; and (3) 217 acres along the south side of Hickory Creek Road. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. DECISION: Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval of proposed annexation of approximately 614.6 acres beginning north of Old Alton Estates, south of Ryan Road, west of FM 2181, and east of G.C. 6 S.F. Railroad, Seconded by, Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (6-0)6 G. A-33. Recommend approval of nronosed annexation of 125.525 acres (orated at Kings Row and proposed Loop 288, south of Oak Bend Estates, and south of Silverdome Road. STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this is a voluntary annex- ation request by Teasley Road Associates, He added that the DISD has submitted a preliminary plat for a 10 acre school site in this proposed annexation. He said that this area has a fair- ly strong development potential. Mr. Juren asked if Oak Bend Estates is included in this annexa- tion. Mr. Ellison said no. IN FAVOR: None prestAnt. OPPOSED: None present. DECISION: Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of proposed annexation of 125.525 acres located at Kings Row and proposed Loop 288, south of Oak Bend Estates, and south of Silverdome Road. Seconded by Mr, Escue and unanimously carried (6-0). A- 30 f ANNEXATION SCHEDULE - January 13. 1986 Submit agenda item A anuary is, 1986 Submit agenda back-up NkrJanuary 21, 19RG City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing /January 22, 1986 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle r/ January 24, 1986 Publish notice and mailout January 27, 1986 Submit agenda item January 29, 1986 Submit agenda back-up February 4, 1986 City Couacit holds first public hearing v February S, 1986 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle v February 1Z 1986 Planning and Zoning commission makes, recommendation February 7. 1966 Publish notice and mailout February 10, 1986 Submit agenda item ' ✓'Febcuacy 12, 1986 Submit agenda back-up February le, 1986 City Council holds second public hoscing February 24, 1986 Submit agenda item L--February 26, 1986 Submit agenda back-up * March 4, 1986 City Councii institutes annexation proceedings March 6, 1986 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle March 9, 1966 Publish ordinance Match 310 1986 Submit agenda item Rpril 20 1986 Submit agoads back-up April at 1986 Final action by City Council at special called seating Denotes action by the City Council 09649 '?-',CV..:: TO: H yror and !tabors of the City Council SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCR SITTING A DATR, TUM AND PLACR FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS CONCERNING THR REQVW OF BMAIRR WIST PARTNERS FOR ANNEXATION Of APPROUKATILY 102.49 ACM BROINNING ADJACUT AND NORTH or JIM CHRISTAL ROAD, SOUTH or U.S. HIGWAY 380H, APPROXIKATRLY 1/2 KILT BAST Or ROAN ROAD AND 3/4 KILE WKST Or UNDRRNOOD ROAD FOR THE PURPOSE Or D3tTRRKINING tiWMMR TO GROIN THE ANNEXATION PROMS (A-34). RECO!'ItItNDATION : The Planning aM Zoning Comission recoumnled approval of the annexation at its meting of February 1.2, 1986. Start recosswnds that Public hearings be held on Karch 18 and April 1, 1966. IMIM. This is a voluntary request for annexation and light industrial soning. No specific plans have been revealed to date. The site is located north of existing city Baits along the south st" of its Christal Road approximately 3/4 to 1 wile west of the Municipal Airport. An annexation strip also *List@ north of the tract along Highway 38014. jAgIgam - Not applicable PROUAM. DE,PUMM OR GROUPS AFFRCTID: No existing housing structures or population are included in the area of request. MC 119 1 Undetemined Res 111 subdi ed: 'Le, I Prepared by: ~lr David Ellison Senior Planner Appr Jeff ftw t ~ Director of planning nand DDawelope nt v. a ~ I CITY COUNCIL AGUM BACK-UP @Ql W SHRn KR9TINQ OATM: March 4 1966 SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning the request of Bellaire West Partners fr•r annexation of approximately 102.49 acres beginning adjacent and north of Jim Christal Rood, south of U.S. Highway 380WO approximately 1/2 mile east of Rgan Road and 3/4 mile west of Underwood Road for the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation process (A-34). SUIMARY: This is a voluntary request with an accompanying petition for light industrial (LI) coning. The tract is located approximately 3/4 to 1 mile west of the Municipal Airport. The owners have not submitted any information regarding specific plans for the site. The nearest existing city limit line begins south of the site along Jim Christal Road and north along Highway 38M. No existing structures or population are included in the area of request. Jim Christal Road is a county maintained road. Perimeter street paving will be required along the entire width of the tract if developed regardless of the result of the annexation request. Some flood plain areR exists within the site. ACTION REQUIRED: Adoption of ordinance. RSCONKMATIONt The Planning and Zoning recommends approval of the annexation. ALTERNATIVES: Adopt ordinance or deny request ATlACHKKMTS : Map cr,ut~ GiQP~n David Ellison Senior Planner 1'~ 18811 r xA-7~A:~xy -F s e -x~:~~±nksF€- rr ~-r '-zsn~1 NO . AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of , 19860 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City-- uncil chambers o t a Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persona the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference heroin. On the day of , 1986, At 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the City-Mounc£1 Chi-- rs o t Municipal Building of the City of Danton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear kind be hoard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION 11. The Mayor of the City of Dorton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearings to be published once in a newspaper having geueral circulation in the City and in the territory described in Exhibit "A" not more than twenty days nor less than tan days prior cr the date of such public hearingr all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 97da, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION 111. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986. KLCF= 0. STEWARTO MAYOR CITY or DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: WM:ME ALLEN CITY SEMETARY CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEVTON, TEXAS BYt A-34/39LLAIRE WEST PARTNERS Y^ EXHIBIT "A" All that Cottalc tract of paces, of land lying and being situated in the Myare, Johnson, ltrummet and Croon Survey, Abstract 1699, said tract being part of a 176 acre tract No. 11 and pact of a Called 6S.e sots tract No, l0, shown by deed to N. T. Evers, a widower, recorded in Volume 399, + page S39, Deed AocOrds of Denton Couaty, Texas, and being voce patticulatly described as tollewsl 111 as es byQOrdinnaancat a point e No. 03-90,t sthe aid ppointt lycity ing in nanseast andaWesthed toad known as Jim Christal; THENCE North 00.11'40" Nest passing at approximately 2S feet. more or less, the North boundary line of said toad, same being the Southwest Corner of a 102.34 acre tract, said tract being part of the above mentioned Evers tract, and continuing along the Most boun4aty line of said 102.34 acre tract, a total saiddistance Northwestecocnersot said 102.34 tot &ore corner tract and lying in the South boundary line of 8414 barb survey; THENCE South 99024145" East along said tract North boun4sty line and said survey line, a 4istsaoe of 1,446.40 feet to a point tot cotter, sass being tho Northeast corner of said 102.34 sore tract and said 176 acre tract; THENCE south 00.11140" Cast along said tracts East boundary line, passing at 3,044.31 toot the southeast earner of said tract and a Northwest - Southeast gotta* lino, said point also beinv the Noceh rtght-ot-way of Jim Christai toad, and continuing a total distance of approsimately 3.090,5 toot, mots or less, to a point tot a cocnRC to the resent city limits as established in Ordinance No. 17-90, and to said toad; TMEMCi North 73000' Host along said present city limits and to said toad to At point tot oerner; THENCE North 82.10, Nest along said pcssant city limits a40 in said road a distanca of 337.63 toot to a point tot cornet; TONG! South 80040 Nest along said present city limits and in said road to the place of boginntag and containing 103.2 acres of land. M 11472 A-34/BLLLAIRE WEST PARTNERS 'a 1307E: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEMINGS .0[i PROPOSED ANiiEXATIUN NOTICE I3 HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTEAESUD PEdSUPS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings,to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1986, at 7100 o'clock P. M. in the CrEy-Touncil Chambers o the' Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 19860 •t T1U0 o'clock P. 'M. in the C t~ "'ounil C efi m~"rs of Me Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be neard, Of all said matters and things, a.ll persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice, XTCXUV'3: `5't'EWAAT 0 KAYaA CITY Of DE.TON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOM ALLEN, CITY b II A-34i82LLAIdE WEST PARTNERS n is EXHIBIT "A"' . All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Myers, Johnson, btuRast and Gtsea survey, Abstract 1699, said tract being part of a 176 so co ctaet No, 11 and pact of a called 6S.S acre tract go. io, shown by 4004 to w. T. Evers, a widower, recorded in volute 399, Pago $39, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, tad being tots particularly described as followed Slat WING at a point in the present city limits, as established by Ordinance Mo. 63-90, said point lying is an East and N,*st road known as Jig Christal; TN3m North 00011,40" Most passing at approximately 21 Cott, note or less, tbo North boundary line of said toad, fats being the Southwest cotaet at a 102.34 acre tract, said tract being pact of the above mentioned Evers tract, and continuing along the Most boundary line of said 102.34 acts tract, a total sadistames to$$, to a point said 102.34 f accs cocnec, and lying in the South boundary line of Said Barb survyy; THENCE South 09026146" East along said tract North boundary Line and said survey line, a distance of 1,466.60 toot to a quint tot oot"er, same being the Northeast cocaec of said 102.34 acre tract and said 176 act* tract= THENCE South 00.111'40" East along said reacts east boundary line, passia; at 3,044.31 toot the southeast corner of said tract and a Northwest - Southeast fames line, said point also being the Nocth tight-of-way of Jim Christal load, and continuing a total distaaoa of approximately 3,090.5 feet, noes or less. to a point for a oocaec in the present city limits as established in Ordinance No. 63_90, and in said toad; THEME North 73000' Meat along said present city limits and in said toad to a point for corner; THEifCE Worth 62.10, Most along said present city limits and in said toad a distance of 337.43 toot to a point for corner; THEIICR South 66.401 west along said present city limits and in said toad to the place of beginning and contaiaimg 103.2 40se4 of land, 11679 A-34/9MUIRE WEST PARTNERS I I_ y ~IVT~! aj ► V1 ~ T Ila r~ 4 C co ♦ E FA • P ~ • lift . y VI s 4 Mica • m . C istoi Ad is f'` ~ • E I r DEN TON I~ r • ~ F ~ ~ oc ~ r IIS►'S Tom •Co! • , 6 _T A Sp r~ As i dQ + R4~ Rd. ~t 1 11 7 e P i Z minutes February 120 1986 H. A-34. Proposed annexation of approximately 102.49 acres. STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this is a voluntary request with an accompanying petition for light industrial (LI) zoning. The tract is located approximately 3/4 to 1 mile west of the Municipal Airport and the owners have not submitted any information regarding specific plans for the site. He said that there are no existing structu,•es or population in the area of request. He said that this would e a benefit to the City and that there is a need to analyze these remote areas of the City. DECISION: Mr. 8scue moved to recommend approval of request o£~r annexation of approximately 102.49 acres beginning adja- cent and north of Jim Christal. Road, south of U.S. Highway 380 west, approximately, 1/2 stile east of Egan Road and 3/4 mile west of Underwood Road. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unani- mously carried (6-0). 1. Amendment to the city ordinance STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that with the present City o Denton ordinance, an operation for on-site sale can be within 100 feet. She added for the state it is 300 feet. PETITIONER: Margaret Johnston stated that the 100 feet specs or itself in that it would be too close to anyone's home. She said that tt has happened within 75 feet of their home, She said that she thinks the neighborhood needs protecting. She said that she would like to see it be 500 feet. Mr. Claiborne asked for her address. Ms. Johnston said 1115 W. Hickory. Mr, Claiborne stated that the business would stay evert if an amendment is requested and approved. Ms. Johnston stated that she knew this and would appreciate the Commissions' consideration. Mr. Claiborne and Mr. Pearson recommend to staff that It would be changed to 300 feet in conformance with the state law. Ms. 3rock, Mr. Juren, and Ms, Cole agreed. Mr. Morris asked the Commission if they wanted it the same for on-premise as well as off-promise, Mr. Claiborne said yes. He asked the staff for a cause and effect report on residences in close proximity to a tavern. or club, DECISION: Ms. Brock moved to recommend an amendment to the cl y-o'Rrinance that would permit a tavern or a club to operate within 300 feet of a dwelling as well as off-premise sale, Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (6-0). J. Park dedication ordinance and planned development ordinance. The Commission agreed to March 3, 1986 for a study session to discuss the p=anned development ordinance at 6:30 p.m. and the j place at staffs' suggestion. The Commission agreed tentatively to March 10, 1986 for a study session to discuss the park dedication ordinance at 6:30 p.m, and the place at staffs' suggestion, K, Joint Session The Planning and Zoning Commission agreed to Monday, February 24, 1986 for a joint study session with the, Historic Landmark Commission to discuss the proposed Nest Oak Street historic ` district at 6:30 p.m, and the place at staff's suggestion. '+y A'hl"'s:. f. ;•e 'w ^•.6'*},°# .t-we- --y-.. ~y:,, x r :'`E^r-we iqT',-; rr a :<.1 x '~,.c„-xv-'aS°a-.~. `7777M /TJ DATE, 03/04/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT • TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: A-40. Annexation. A proposed ordinance to set a date$ time and place for public hearings on a proposed annexation. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the ordinance. SUMMARY: The annexation is to protect against adverse development in Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction. BACKGROUND: Description and map are attached. PROGRAMS DEPARTHWS OR GROUPS AFFECTIM: City growth patterns FISCAL IMPACT: Unknown Resp 'ully itt oy r e city Manager Prepa d Jejye Appro% d: 91-40 K as lelf Meyer 34 Director of Planning and Development I354I. NO. AN OKDINANCe SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPEKTY AS DESCRIBED IN • EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO BY THE C11'y OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of , 1986, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City--Council Cham era o t e Municipal BuildinS of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. On the da of 1986, at :0 i'clk .M. i City n he City--Munci2 hsmWrF of th Municipal7Bu0 ildingo of Pthe hearingf giving Denton, al1T interested Council the right will hold a appear and public be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearings to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the territory described in Exhibit "A" not more than twenty days nor less than tan days prior to the date of such public hearings, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 970s, Vernon'& Texas Civil statutes). SECTION III. This ordi:iance shall be in full, force and effect immediately following i,rs passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986. r KICHARD CITYOF-aDE~ON, TEXASMAYUR ATTEST: CWLOTTE CITY SECKETUY CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: A-40/CITY OF DENTON d-r EXHIBIT "A" All that certain treat or parcel of lend lying and being situated in the county of Denton, State of texas and being a part of the J. Ayers Survey, Abstract 2, N. Burleson Survey, Abstrast 930 J. Burleson Survey, Abstract 9l, • S. M. Williawe Survey, Abstract 1262, J. Carter Survey, Abstract 231, W. Pogue Survey, Abstract 1013, and r. Jaime Survey, Abstract 664, and more fully described As follows KOINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point lying at the interseotioe of the seat boundary lice of the tract described in Ordinance e66-05 with the center line of an Cast and Nest toed known as gaotor hoed, said point also lying 350 toot Wt of and perpendicular to the eentor line of 1-35 and the North boundary tine of said J. Ayers Survey, sane being the South boundary line of the B. Burleson Surveys THCNCt South 660 40' Cast along said lines a distance of 606.71 teat, sore or loss, to a point for corner, saiA point lying in the center of said road, said point also Was a Northeast corner of said J. Ayers Survey, mw being the Northwest corner of said W. Burleson Surveil TRUCK South 69. 35' Cast along the Northern boundary line of said W. Burleson Survey a distance of 2,695,0 test, more or less, to a point for corner, said point lying in the center of said road, said point also being the Northeast corner of said W. Burleson Survey, the Southeast corner of the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract 65, and the West line of said J. Burleson Survey; THCNCC North 10 42' 30" Bast along the Cut boundary line of said S. Burleson Survey, sass being the West boundary lino of sold J. Burleson Survey, passing the North boundary line of said road and continuing along said lines to a point lying to the Bast boundary line of said B. Burleson Survey, said point also being the Northwest 00rnsr of said J. Burleson Survey, and tbo Southwest corner of tl,e William Bryant Survey, Abstract 1614, for a corner; THUCI South 690 07' 03" Cast along the North boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey, saws being the South boundary Line of said William Bryant Survey, puling at 2,639.74 feet, more or lase, the Northeast corner of said J. Burleson Survey, same being the Northwest corner of said S. William Survey, and oontinuing a total distenoe of 4,211.94 feet, more or less, to e point for corner, said point being the Northeast ouraor of sold S. Williams Survey, sacs being the Southeast corner of said WIlllem Bryant Survey, seas being the Southeast corner of the D. Goddard Survey, Abstract 462, said point also lying in the West boundary line at said J. Carter survey; TK4NCt North along the Cast boundary line of said D. Goddard Survey, sores being the West boundary It" of said Carter Survey, passing at 3300.0 toot, more OP less, the Northeast corner of said D. Goddard Survey, same being the southerly Southeast corner of the Killian Crawford Survey, Abstraot 260, end continuing a total distance of 3,145.12 toot, more or less, to a point for corner, said point being an tuner all corner of said Wllltam Crawford survey, man botng the Northwest ooraer of said J. Carter Survey; TNCNCY test aloes the North boundary lino of said J. Carter Survey, same being the South boundary lino of said William Crawford Survey, passing at 21753 toot, more or less, the Southeast corner of said Crawford Survey, sage being the Southwest corner of the W.C. Gillespio Survey, Abstract 1465, passing at 3732.96 foot, more or ins, the Northeast corner of said J, Carter Survey, son being the Northwest corner of said W. Pogue Survey, passing at 5243.92 tot, more or lass, the Southwest corner of said Gillespie Survey, sans being the Northwest corner of a 15 care treat of land u conveyed from G. t. Stookard to J. C, Stookard by eased dated November 10, 1972 and recorded to volume 661, Page 64 of the deed records of Denton County, Texas, and continuing along said boundary line a total distenae of 7,690.69 toot, more or less, the Northeast corner of said treat, sold point lying in the Cast boundary line of said Jaime Survey, same being the West boundary line of said William Cars- t Surveil A-40/CITY OF DENTON ?MCC South along the tart boundary line of said JaLsw Survey, save being the West boundary lieu of said Moromnt Survey a distance of 500 feet to a point tar Conner; TNKMCK '(eat 500 test South of and parallet to the Worth boundary Line of the above mentioned IS sore tract oonveysd to J. 1. Stochard, passing at 2097.0 toot, sore or lose, the hest boundary line of said tract assn being e point • in the easterly Vast boundary line Of said Jake Survey, ~and the last boundary line of said W. Pogue Survey, and coatinutn8 along matt Ito* 500 test South of and parallel to the Worth boundary line of matt W. Pogue Survey, Fascias at 3957.93 toot, more or less, the '(eat bountery line of matt Pogue Survey, saws being the last boundary line of said J. Carter Survey, and continuing along said lines a total Ustaeute of 7,190.69 feet, sore or lose, to a point for corner, said point lying 500 toot 8outa of Sad perpendicular to the Korth boundary line of said Carter Survey, matt point aloe lying 500 test last of and perpendicular to the West boundary line at said Carter Survey; TNOCK South 500 foot gut of and paraleled to the West boundary line of said Carter Survey, a distance of 3,757.12 tat, sere or loss, to a point for corner, said point lying 500 tat lost at and perpendicular to the West boundary line of said Carter Survey; TMC9 Korth 896 07' 03" West passing at 500 fat the West boundary Line of said J. Carter Survey, same the Rut boundary lino of said S. William Survey, and continuing along said line 500 toot South of and parallel to the Korth boundary line of said Williams Survey, psmekns at 2,087.11 feet, mare or 1e68, the West boundary line of maid William Survey, mows being the last boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey, and continuing along said line a total distance of 4226.85 feet, more or loss, to a point for corner, said point also lying $00 feet South of and perpendicular to the Worth boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey, said point also Lying 9OO Not last of and perpendicular W the West boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey; TRUCK South 10 42' 30" West along a line 500 feet last of and parallel to the West boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey to a point 500 tat South of and $00 feet last of the Northeast corner of the W. Burleson Survey, the Southwest corner of the B. Burissoa Survey, Car a oo nu r; TRUCI North 890 35' West passing at 500 feet the west boundary line of said J. Bur1M0n Survey, sass being the last boundary ltne of said W. Burleson survey and continuing along said line 500 test South of and parallel to the Korth boundary llae of said W. Burleson Survey, a distance of 3,191.73 tat, sots or leas, to a point lying to the West boundary line of said W. Burleson Survey, sass being an last boundary tine of maid J. Ayers Survey; TMKKCI Worth 88'40' West along a line 500 tat South Of mad parallel to the North boundary line of said J. Ayers Surrey, a dietanro of 772.26 feet, more or less, to a point for corner, said point lying $00 foot South of and parallel to a North boundary line at said J. Awe Survey, said point also lying is present city Halite as established by Ordinance 186-05; TMKNCK North 20 50, West $50 feet But of mad parallel to the center line of 1-35 for a distance of 501.33 fat to the plus at belinning and containing approxtsa:ely 22640 sores of land. i A-40 CITY OF DENTON Y ~PK'i4 a`4{r`i4 •~i),.. «""rzr .t''c g _.p t +ey `w. S., 141 13S4L NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS cy.V PROPOSED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described in Exhibit "A"s attached hereto and incor- porated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 19860 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti-y 'Council Cm era o t e Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persona interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 19860 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti-y council Clam era of- Municipal t e Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persona shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, wi:l take notice. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CRMTTE RLEN, CITY SECRETARY A-40/CITY OF DENTON gw+gtrj°j .zysr .,gs~rsr{.'w.aki' -2W'1 r 's .m 'lk k4Ta t-s :^r,s 'rpm!-'~ d EXHIBIT "A" All that certain treat or paroel or load lying and being situated in the county of Denton, State of 709" and being a part of the J. Ayers Survey, Abstract 2, W. Burleson Survey, Abstract 93, J. Burlesoa Survey, Abstract 91, • S. M. William Survey, Abstract 1202, J. Carter Survey, Abstract 237, W. Pogue Survey, Abstract 1013, and P. Jslss Survey, Abstract 664, and more fully desortbed as follows., 800IN11tNo at a point in the prevent city limits, said point lying at the Laterseotton of the last boundary line of the treat desovibsd in Ordinance 486-05 with the owntsr lint of an Cast and West toad known as Rector Road, said point also lying 350 toot last of and perPeadtaular to the center line of 1-35 sew! the North boundary line of said J. Ayers Survey, seem betel the mouth boundary line of the S. Burleson Survey; THINCI South 884 40' last along said lives a distance of 808.7t feet, sore or less, to a point for corner, 1914 point lying to the center of said road, uald point also being a Northeast corner of said J. Ayers Survey, same being the Northwest corner of said W. Burleson Survey; THINCI South 891 35' last along the Northern boundary line of said M. Burleson Survey a distends of 2,695.0 feet, more or less, to a point for corner, said. point lying in the center of said road, said point also being the Northeast corner of said W. Burleson Survey, the Southeast corner of the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract 65, and the West line of said J. Burleson Survey{ THINCI Worth 10 42' 30" last along the last boundary line of said B. Burleson Survey, arse being the West boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey, passing the North boundary line of salt road and continuing along said lines to a point lying In the last boundary line of said F. Burleson Survey, said point also being the Northwest corner of said J. Burleson Survey, and the Southwest corner of the William Bryant Survey, Abstract 1614, for a corner; THIWCI South 896 07' 03" last along the North boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey, same being the South boundary line of said Wtlllem Bryant Survey, passim at 2,619.74 toot, Nbrs or less, the Northeast darner of sold J. Burleson Survey, same being the Northwest corner o! said S. William Survey, and continuing a total distanoe of 4,211.94 feet, more or less, to a point for corner, salt point being the Northeast corner of said S. William Survey, same being the Southeast corner of said William Bryant survey, as*,& being the Southeast corner of the D. Goddard Survey, Abetreat 462, said point also lying in the West boundary line of said J. Carter Survey; TNINCI North along the last boundary line of said 0. Goddard Survey, game being the West boundary tine of said Carter Survey, passing at 3300.0 fast, wore or loss, the Northeut corner of said D. Goddard Survey, same being the southerly Southeast corner of the William Crawford Survey, Abstract 280, and continuing a total distance of 3,755.12 test, sots or loss, to a point top Cotner, still point being an inner all. corner of said William Crawford Survey, same being the Northwest corner of said J. Carter Survey; THINCl last 91009 the North boundary line of gall J. Carter Survey, same being the South boundtry line Of said William Crawford Survey, passing at 2779.5 feet, man or lass, the Southeast corner of said Crawford Survey, tam being the Southwest darner of the W.C. Gillespie Survey, Abstract 1465, passing at 3732.46 toot, acre or less, the Northeast corner of said J. Carter Survey, same being the Nortbwest uornar of said W. Pogue survey, passing at 5243.92 feet, more or less, the Southeast corner of said Gillesple Survey, east being the Northwest darner of a 15 acre tract of land as conveyed from G, 1. Stookord to J. I. Stookard; by deed dated November 10, 1972 and recorded in Volume 681, Page 64 of the dead records of Denton County, Texas, and continuing along said boundary ltne a total distance of 7,690.09 feet, men or less, the Northsu t corner of said treat, said point lying to the last boundary tins of said Jaime Survey, same being the West boundary kids of sail William Norment Survey; A-40/CITY OF DENTON i'` ' 4 ~ t''^' rmr iarv;}yi, . 's 3' st. , p5: >YUZ*•• e . swm_ a+`~r3r r: = ~N: rm'5.2m 1 era; x TRUCK South along the Ra:! boundary lino of said Jaias survey, saw betas the test b"b"ty line of said Norwnt Survey a distance of 500 feet to a point for corner; TRUCK Wet 500 toot South of and parallel to the North boundary line of the above osatieaed 15 veto tract conveyed to J. g, Btoekasd, passing at 2097.0 toot, we* or lees, the Wet boundary line at tatd tract, eon being a point In the easterly West boundary line of said him Survey, and the cast boundary 1Lne of said W. Pogue Survey, cal continuing along said tine 500 feet South of and parallel to the North boundary line of said W. Pogue surrey, passing at 3951.93 test, Non or less, the West boundary Has of said Pogue survey, sons betas the gas% boundary line of said J. Carter survor said Lines a total distmes of 1,110.89 foot, owes 'L„ep to a pointafoar cornier, said point Sytsy 500 feet South of am .?srpeedlonlar to the worth boundary line of said Carter surrey, said point also lying $00 feat test of and perpendicular to the West boundary tins of said Carter Survey; TRUCK South 500 toot cast of cad parateled to the West boundary line of said Carter Survey, a dlstaacs of 30755.12 toot, move or less, to a point for corner, said point lying 500 toot Bast of and porpondicular to the hest boundary lime of said Carter Survey; TRUCK north 090 OT' 03" West passing at 500 test the West boundary line of said J. Carter Survey, cow the gast boundary line of said S. William survey, and continuing along said line 500 toot south of and parallel to the North boundary line of said William Survey, passing at 2,081.11 feet, more or less, the West boundary line of said William Survey, gam betas the last boundary tine of said J. Burleson Survey, and continuing along said line a total distanoe of 4226,85 toot, more or leas, to a point for corner, said point also lying 500 toot south of cad perpendicular to the North boundary livae of said J. Burleson Survey, said point also lying 500 feet cast of cad perpendicular to the West boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey; THBNCC South 10 42' 30" West along a line 500 feet Bast of and parallel to the West boundary time of said J. Burleson Survey to a point 500 test South of and $00 toot Bast of the Northeast corner of the W. Burleson Survey, the Southwest corner of the N. Surleson survey, tot a corner; TRUCK North 89. 35, West passing at Soo toot the West boundary line of said J. Burleson Survey, saw betas the grit boundary Lino of said W. Burleson Survey and continuing along said line 500 test south of and parallel to the North boundary line of said W. Burleson Survey, a distance of 30191.73 foot, scare or lees, to s point lying to the Voot boundary line of said W. Burleson survey, saw betas on last boundary line of said J. Ayers Survey; TRUCK North 664 40' West along a line 500 toot South of and parallel to the North boundary line of said J. Ayers Survsy, a Alston" of ?72.26 toot, Note or less, to a point for comae, said point lying 900 toot South of sad parallel to a North boundary lice of said J. Ayers Survey, said point also lying to present city lLM is as established by Ordinance M-05; TRUCK North 20 50, Vest 350 toot last of and pavtllel to the *"tot tine of t-35 tot a distance of 501.33 test to the place of beginning cad doatataizg approximately 226.70 acres of land. A-40/CITY OF DENTON At1 . / tots 0•j41 11`~41 I At 0 t/Ai roll (AAsowL4... ~I Wft -.LI~.L N ` ` i~ ff ~ a" A4. ~ of 4 A•M 0 VS* s 4 ~ y 106 At ~ 1M4Y [(,p W d AVOWLV K q.1 At O't41n! 0f0. f Ac = Q~ A$4 li 4t 44 0f6.1 'ts ,L Vag y 4t,I As t 1 N O. C^W* A : /!416 t~ 41Z N ! IIL lj~ ~p itk ; V D r 1S fM6u 214, Is4c 1YRfJR ewv TgIL ` F N R Y M USA +~JAe ` 111 A.. 7J.I 14C 4 ~A~µ♦~ ' k ~ =x t ` v 10 tt Y MnM MrfL K MYM,W OWN At. frfr,WNr JIB f~ J r/Al /t ` N ~ w1/C VI" 60 WA, ~ CAtMIGt AWr. 4t ntak tt IA. 1tlk VS4 At. 6 C4VN.1t ' ,I41'N M4,('S.yAaL J64 1411 ~ 1 a F.M t W rk rlr .4N! /b At elf f Ac ""'t A'4,0f Af/LLJR t i764 Ac WSJ 4, r~WIL[ [M 1, • a M6 % krrv ~'IK lLIM 16L4AL SS6AI ti 64.6 At d e - K 94 v~RNil LJ 4 ty` '~'L 61. f k : y,, r i • r ~j V[ R~C[ D /46.9 Ac 0 t, Y r' ~3F if, fi u ll cuA CAU41L9 !Nr t ]i~f f r . y6 ~aL i« t ~r 4' t ~ N MIAI ' IQM'N OF SAN6[f! Mt ryeNU y} It 4c JP/ R TALL f It r4a 9 IILLY! 4411 SAC ~D ~y^ L ` 6M6 f~ O/mftt, A rS,4 4c ar Y ~'L JAS 0&4A14 M R M s, TA 9.441, •y ♦ h.11k ti ♦ © 101.4 J I IOL4 k 44. ti try DMC 6b."LL.. ~.1.._j• e tJAe K6 i ♦ Ma 11 16M1i Ilk ✓ONN AMRTfM S • S1RAtr r 9 . /Of Ac ` WWAW t',M 6IfIt /s6 ./.r Jat roc J/Ac we#r40M M J*"** by h d .4W6 Jt. 4 As a f It M/A6 h, 4 ti ♦ OtGAM „As 0J At • w Z I 4 • L i ti tidy' 048 JA& Lr AMn Keourrxv e Alf'" /tAen '"41 f 414 J Yew ♦ ~ 1JA 01410 w k WM J/IAl `+t4 9011iv 16. '110 ANULJI„t. APO Mt Y /n4 y c Aws, x J t t tt At 41 Ip !VJ/k. 41 P+IUI wVCMd, sg. t I tI A. 4 4' 7f 61411 ~p `46 *va i r A. ~ 1 1 100 4t ~ ~ 1 d t tvAMt ►J Ac t tAr ~ ♦ ♦ ♦r♦ .-r'• ~~'~O Y O R lrrttKO KlAI' ~ Ty K~t4a ~ Aa{I rA 411 `Y wti „4L Ar 0/ c uL 0 WrCM! X [l L410iAyflR C4CLAND RtDllt6 IJAS 4e is r ►4 t J14AC 7 1J1 NIA JJI64c 00.10 At {Y. ♦ « h I 4RLON0 twrON 1 ' cfppJy Ac Q ► r sr p-~i♦ 0 L 1,~11tS.Ik ♦~♦~0 ds. frceKARI Q L' yy R « Jwr L searvq » 3 116, rk !~A'r JA.~Mry[L ' w ' A [o[ 4I I Ac A WA~ 1 .tMw i % vJR s iiBBf[:i ♦e~ 4 rs.l~s Y Jwn,st ~ t • r A6t M. 'II hW00s r O t Q • R1 Jt4, sIaAc ♦ ~p ltsfAL 4♦* t* D + ro ♦JI IRJS K~ L-0 Mr ■111`~~ f JarMr 60 Or A& M06 4 goo OM i 2 tR«N f' ♦ M b = y r p~ ~ rJA: ,,n a I M /R/fr y t too /.e LpNt«►. f11 r!4 c 0 } JJI.6 A+, f.AMt to JIl Ar a66no L-JOEAIL-..A &A tft do 11 ± + x 6 w Ift ".8 ON w, a. ui 04 bi } .,w ~ afi+ sr+y,+ass . ',g ; 'z ^ .v: , -.e:• , 7tSg+i rc r._; v y s v pS x~ f D11'R s Q3/Odii6 CI?i' M MM rO1Mw i TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council rw- Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUMCT% Z-1745 (~iCO!l~1IDATIOII t The City Council approved an amendment to a planned development (PD-90) on June 18, 1985. An error in the legal description of 85-119 requires an amendment to correct the ordinance. BACKQ UNDt The petition of Dale Davis and Neil Nelles requesting an amendment to a section of planwid development for residential uses. PBQQR. DRU Tl4 M OR GROUPS AI"CT%D : No departments are affected. FISCAL M&CTi No impact on the general fund. Res tf 1 tt 1 d VAr"ll City Manager Pro red by. Cecile Carson Urban Planner Appr ed Jeff Mey Director of Planning and Development Oc"o 1 .1,f SY .;c ~.i,~ °3m4i.?~.. ~ aR rS'.:• r 1 ro" y# :R ,mss , . e.aT *.rz.•. 2 4t'{!FS r i MOL ; NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 85-119 TO PROVIDE FOR A ('ORRECTBD LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY THEREBY REZONED; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF 0EMON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section I of Ordinance No. 85.119, is hereby amended to correct an error in the legal description of the property thereby rezoned, so that the le al description contained in Section I of Ordinance No. 65-111 shall hereafter read as is shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto. SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance No, 85-119 so as to show t'ne correction hereby made. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. KICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; M7X,[O-TTT7 0 CITY3MTW CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY. _ Y 1!L y1/W1 Z-1745 f . r. ~Xf[IBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION NORTH PARCEL FIELD NOTES TO PD-90.1 Being all of that certain lot tract or parcel of land situated in the Samuel McCracken Survey, Abstract 817, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 3/4' iron rod for corner at the present intersection of the North right-of-way line of State Highway Loop 288 (a variably width right-of-way) with the East right-of-way line of Sherman Drive (FM 428 - a 100' right-of-way)i THENCE North 28051147' East, $28.29' with the East line of Sherman Drive to a 3/4' iron rod at the Southwest corner of the Massey 4 Wilson property; THENCE South 89052151" East, 999.22' with the South line of said tract to a 1/2' iron rod for corner in common cast line of the McCracken Survey and West line of the H.B. Williams Survey, Abstract 1417; THENCE South 010481510 west, 1,372.58' with said common survey line to a 3/4' iron rod for corner in the North line of State Highway Loop 288; THENCE North 526181120 West, 357.16' with the North line of the highway to a 5/8' iron rod for corner; THENCE North 58°00159' West, 500.00' with the North line of the highway to a 5/8' iron rod for corner; THENCE North 51035111' West, 446.46' with the North line of the highway to a 5/8' iron rod for corner; THENCE North 58043135' West, 147.69' with the North line of the highway to a 5/8' iron rod for corner: THENCE North 20043138' West, 79,11' with the North line of the highway to the place of beginning and containing 11110,879.143 square feet or 25,5023 acres of land. 0059k Z-1745 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SOUTH PARCEL FIELD NOTES TO PD-9011 Being all of that certain lot tract or parcel of land situated in the Samuel McCracken Survey, Abstract 817, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being sore particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 3/4' iron rod for corner at the present intersection of the South tight-of-w&y lane of State Highway Loop 288 (a variable width right-of-way) with the East right-of-way line of Sherman Drive (FN 428 - a 100' right-of-way); THENCE North 72014+3'r" East, 67.83' with the South line of State Highway 288 to a 3/4' iron rod for corner; THENCE South 5b°43135" East, 136.29' with the South line of the highway to a 5/8' iron rod for corner; THENCE South 62031128' East, 254.46' with the South line of the highway to a 5/8' iron rod for corner; THENCE South 640011310 East, 191.05' with the South lino of the highway to a 5/8' iron rod for corner; THENCE South 65008129• East, 403.11' with the South line of the highway to a 5/8' iron rod for corner) THENCE South 58000159' East, 400.00' with the South line of the highway to a 5/81 iron rod for corner; THENCE South 59055132" East, 216.66' with the South line of the highway to a 3/4' iron rod for corner in the common East line of the McCracken Survey and West, line of the James Coltart Survey, Abstract 288) THENCE South 01048151" West, 2,231.77' with the common line of said surveys to a 1/2" iron rod at the Northeast corner of the John Carter Survey, Abstract 274, and in Kings Row (no recorded right-of-way width)) THENCE North 88038133' West, 667.89' with the common line of the Carter and McCracken Surveys and with Kings Row to a nail at the Southeast corner of the Massey property) THENCE North 000171000 Ea,at, 105.06' to a point for corner in a ditch and at the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 88003100" and a radius of 60.001; THENCE around said curve and with the ditch and the East line of the Massey property, a distance of 92.21' to a point for corner; Z-1745 . 'wt -tt 'r q r ro ~e FIELD NOTES YO-90.1 Page Two THENCE North 87046000" West, 166.53' with the ditch and North line of the Massey property to a point for corner in the northeast line of Cambridge Square Subdivision, an addition to the City of Denton, Texas, and at the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 52016'00" and a radius of 101.9111 THENCE around said curve and with the ditch and Northeast line of the subdivision, a distance of 92.97' to a point for corner; THENCE North 356301001 West, 738.68' with the ditch and Northeast line of the subdivision to a point for corner; THENCE North 310301000 West, 214.941 with the ditch and Northeast line of the subdivision to a point for corner; THENCE North 35030000' West, 653.17' with the ditch and Northeast line of the subdivision to a point for corner; THENCE North 57°211000 west, 81.25' with the ditch and Northeast line of the subdivision to a point for corner in the East line of Sherman Drive; THENCE North 28051147' East, 1,571.70' with the East line of Sherman Drive to the place of beginning and containing 4,537,765.64 square feet of 104.1728 acres of land. i i 0059k z-1745 r S a ♦ ! vti.~ S` r f ~Pi :ay h3gk- ....~•;e'6"`4g n g i r... 03/04/66 F' DA". CITY CW-Clk 11221 MW 5TO Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning from single family (S!-7) to the planned development (PD) district for office use on a tract approximately 1,2 acre in size located on the east side of Carroll Boulevard approximately 500 feet south of Eagle Drive. (Z-],764) RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. SUMMARY: The City Council approved a planned develop;,int (PD) for office use on this tract in September, 1985, with conditions included in the ordinance. The Carroll Boulevard frontage of the property has been platted and building plans have been submitted for review. BACR~ ND: Not applicable. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined. Respect ]y submit ed: 4oZydHarrell Pr pared byi City Manager l David Ellison Senio► Planner App ve Jeff Me Director of Planning and Development 1465a r lima w4; ~.~~t+ti~;t°'R~v '~`,a 4j ae.=rsr -.wsss~} ~9 ",.saG.,'.,~ r. .e. sr .stiff °i 4_. 1S3SL 140. AN allDIRMCE AMENDING THE ZONING NAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON • TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX To THE CODE Oi 4 ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTOdo TEXAS by ORDINANCE N0. 69-1 AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID NAP APPLIES TO 1.1 ACRES OP LAND IACATE6 ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARROLL BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY $00 FE6T SOUTH OF EAGLE DRIV14, AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DtSCRIAW HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE- FAMILY "SF-7" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMM "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $100OO.~;C n a VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTIOV I. That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable to all or part of the property described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorpporated by reference herein is hereby changed from Single-Family "SP-711 District Classification and Use to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION it. That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any building within the planned development district, the following conditions shall be not: 1. No detached signs shall be permitted. 2. The development and use of the district shall conform and be in substantial compliance with the site plan shown in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Unless otherwise shown in the site plan, the district shall conform to all development standards and regulations appli- cable to office zoning districts as contained in Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, pro- vided, however, that no building shall exceed two stories in height. 3. No building permits shall be issued and no develop- ment shall begin in that part of the district shown as Phase II in Exhibit 'B" until a comprehensive site plan is submitted and approved therefore. A landscaping plan shall be submitted with the compre- hesiva site plan for Phase It. 4. No out in the Carroll Boulevard median shall be allowed for left turn access to the district for south bound traffic on Carroll Boulevard. SECTION III. The Zoning Nap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. f 9le2k ~ t d 1~'Nx -s' 1 ~ ar 3 x i.y a~T- 1£ Y' i ~ a ~ n- ] t r-~ ` f~ $ . 69-1, Le, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subJect to the above conditions and specifications. S"TION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the oaneral welfare of the City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of Land for the maximum benefit to the City of Dentor, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION V. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Ono Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of !,ts passage and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the capption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton 4tecord-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the data of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RICHARD T.79T CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CWLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECREMY CITY OF DENTON,,TEW) APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRA`.OVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS BY: tfVw 1 J Z-1764/PAGE 2 x A _4 JIM I 'gel LUX WOW MIL- ~ • LA NO ftANNrVO • 8LM"YVgQ eMAaM'BIM "eKlO" MMA,la~Allllr. N,Sn Awe, eel@gMMyr . 7732.2 FI2LD NOTES All that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the Alexander 3111 Survey A-623 in the City of Denton, Texas and being all of Lot 1 3loek 1 of the Carroll Point Addition, recorded in Cabinet D Page 202 Plat Recordu, the remainder of the ilyrtle Addition recorded in Cabinet B Page 231 Plat Records and the reminder of 9 tract shown by deed to Edna toys recorded It 7olume 709 ?age 29 Deed Records of Denton County, Two and being more particularly described as one tract as followss HOLUM at the Northwest corners of Lout 1 Block I of the Carroll Point Additions THESMF South 89 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds Bast with the :forth line of said Carroll Point Addition and continuing with the North line of said %ays track 338.13 feet to a point in the 'Meet right-of-way of ;dyrtle Street; THPVC13 South 01 degrees 34 minutes 17 seconds hest with the 'lest right-of-way of ;lyrtle treat and the Seat line of the ;:yrtle Addition 181.69 feet to the southeast corner of said ayrtle Addition; r-UNCE North 89 degrees 3.3 minutes 12 seconds ',feat with the South line of said 6lyrtle Addition 161.37 feet to Its' nost Southerly Southwest corner; T.`IE.WE `forth 00 de3r%tes 30 minutes 00 seconds 7.aet wit:s the most "astarly 14st line of asi1; lyrtle Addition a distance of 70.0 feet to the Southeast corner of Maid Carroll Point Addition; T'l,"NCC North 39 degrees 3J minutes 12 seconds West with the South line of said Carroll Point Addition 127.03 feet to its Southwest corner in the :lortheasterly right-of-way of Carroll Blvd.; T3VCZ North 22 degrees 00 minutes 43 seconds '!net with the Northeasterly line of Carroll Blvd. 121.0 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 1„055 acres of land. EXHIBIT "A" 1122 FORT WORTH ORVE • OEiNTON, TEXAS 78203 • 16171383-1416 • MQTRO 43O-le62 roraM6Aw FNUAK, eDWAM a AMWOATM INC. i P~ti~c r 5. t I tN • u, W • •waiac . . 1 • NI W WA 91 ♦I WII ♦Y♦ ~ TURE ,1 14, ,.M..M •a., I I aT1I "r nlf..gl `Iw , •~~1 1 I _'D 444 OWWWS W.. 1 , J I _ minutes Planning and Zoning Commission August 2s, 1915 The re ulas meetiag of the Planning and tominse Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Nedaesday, August 210 1915, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building, Present: Keith Appletons Buline Brock, Ruby Cole, R. B. Bscue, Jr., • Gary Juren and Tom Pearson Absent: Bill Claiborne Present from Staff: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Deveiopmeat; David Elison, Seaief Planner; Denise Spivey, Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; Dave 4am, Assistant Director of Utilities; Jerry Clark, City Engines; Ray Rumfield, Civil Engineer; Audrey Bachman and Susan Mitchell, Secretaries vice-Chairman R. B. Bscue, Jr, called the meeting to order, 1. CONSENT AGENDA: It was moved by Ms, Cole, seconded br Ns, Brock, an unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the consent agenda as follows; A. A proval of corrected final plat of the Sunburst Place Two Addition, B. Approval of preliminary and final plats of the Gardner-Pikes Addition, Lot 1, Block A. C. Approval of Robinson Road street dedication plat (Oakmont Estates). 11, PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Z-T1764. Petition of Bonny and Barbara Russell requesting Zf1[llge in toning from the single family (SP-7) classifi- acreotracttlocatednon theae~st sidePof CarrolltBoulevard approximately 500 feet south of Eagle Drive. if approved, the planned development will permit the construction of office buildings. Chairman asked for a motion to remove item from table; moved by Mr Pearson, seconded by Ms. Cole, and unani- mously carried (6-0). HISTORY: Ms. Spivey stated that request was tabled at the Is meeting to allow petitioner to submit a nev site plan relocating curb cut on Carroll Boulevard. She advised that notices were ressiled to twelve property owners within 200 feet; no reply foram were received in favor or in opposi- tion. Mr. Appleton asked if there were our other changes besides the curb cut. Me. Spivey replied that the moving of the curb cut has changed the alignment of buildings from ear- i tier site plan a little bit. Curb cut has be►a moved up to the northern boundary instead of center southern loca- tion so first proposed. This changes parking ctoafigurs- tion, but same land uco is proposed. r ! i Minutes AWU$ t 269 1085 Page 2 Mr. Pearson asked the purpose of this change, Ms. Spivey replied that changing the curb cut was to comply with major city policy of trying to control access along Carroll Boulevard as much as possible. It was felt also by moving the curb cut to a northern position that there was a possibility of joint access with property owner to the north which would limit the total number of curb cuts that would be required in the future. PETITIONER: Nanny Russell stated it was their under- 3t'Bfliling that staff wanted the curb cut relocated to allow possible joint access for this property and prop- erty Immediately to the north. He said there would be no additional curb cut, just a new location for the proposed curb cut. On question, he said their 24 foot curb cut could be widened by the property owner to the north when he is ready to develop, making one 3S foot cut for joint access, Russell Stogsdell, architect, stated that he not with t City Engineer after the last hearin , they discussed several options, and this seems to go an equitable solution. He explained that at the time the lot to the north is developed they can break the curb and widen it for joint access, that their coming in at an angle helps that situation. He said this does change layout of build- Ing and parking, On question, he said they don't control the area designated for future development, that owners of that property elected to join them in the request but it will be a different development, IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that this is a request !Ur a p'utoll office use, that Phase I is represented by specific fits plan presented, that future office develop- ment is prnposed on remainder of tract which is shown as future development on site plan. She said that the basic issue has been access point to property. She explained that one access point exists on Carroll for proposed office development to the south and one access point has been ap- proved on Myrtle Street for proposed restaurant south of Phase II, These curb cuts were worked out during zoning process for those properties. After the last meeting petitioner consulted City Engineer and has located the, Carroll Boulevard curb cut in best place possible for future joint access with property to the north to comply with city policy of limited access on major arterials. A curb cut is proposed on Myrtle Street for Phase 11 develop- sent. She continued that property is located in moderate intensity area, that area is over standard by 35 percent based on existing zoning. When petitioner came in with a request for zoning change they felt a more comprehensive plan rather than piecemeal development would be desirable and property owners fronting on Myrtle Street joined in the request. She said this is an example of a proposal that is positive from a site specific development but is not satisfactory from an intensity standpoint. She re- ferred to Development Guide policy of protection of older neighborhoods and adjacent residences stating that on the lots that are listed as future development there are exist- ing houses that are in rather poor condition. These are located in CDBG tar at area and may be eligible for reha- bilitat~ion. She said that staff cannot recommend approval of this request due to violation of intensity standard, however, staU is aware of practical considerations such { as surrounding losing and land use and suggests that if Commission is inclined to recommend approval that condi- tions ibould be attacked. 3 eF ! t t Minutes August 2S, 1915 Page 3 Mr. Juren asked about parkin ratio and Ks. Spivey replied that plan conforms with standards in zoning ordinance required for office development. On further qquestion, Ms. Spivey said this is a specific site plan for Phase I, that area shown as future development will require specific site plan approval by Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council before building permits can be issued. REBUTTAL: None offered. Public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr, Pearson moved to recommend approval of I-_T7FMubject to the following conditions: 1. No detached sins will be permitted in the development. 2. The developmon shall conform to the approved PD con- cept plan. Any development standards not addressed on the site plan will be consistent with standards of the office zoning district in the City of Denton Zoning ordinance. 3. A specific comprehensive site plan shall be approved forPhase tl before building permits as be issued. 4. Building height shall not exceed two (25 stories. 5. No break in the Carroll Boulevard median shall be permitted for left turns into Phase I. 6, The architectusl character of the buildings shall be compatible with residential structures in the vicinity. 7. Landscaping shall be provided consistent with the Phase I site plan and shall be included on the Phase 11 site plan. LSeeconded by Mr. Appleton and unanimously carried (6-0). B. Z-1762. Petition of James N. Brown Company requesting a in zoning from the agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification on 74,97 acres. The property is located east of 1.35, north of Payne Drive, and west pf Westggate Drive, The following land uses are proposed for tJ:a planned development: Office - 21.855 acres Neighborhood Service - 4.00 acres Townhouses - 11,00 acres Single Family (SF-10) - 28,00 acres Twelve notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; two reply forms were received in favor, one reply form was received in opposition. ' PETITIONER: roger Barrett, planner, stated that site plan was ormu ated through site analysis, concerns expressed at neighborhood meetings, comments from the earlier Plan- ning and Zoning Commission aeeting, and staff comments. He said they are providing a diversity of land use, that transportation system is in balance with land use. He said they are providing a public facility, that Payne Drive will be improved to 1-35 service road. They feel y this will help promote access and circulation in this part of the city. He agreed that proposal does not comply with Development Guide In one particular area, office area. ' Development Guide limits office development to four acres in a low intensity area however, thei feel becou a of site specifics, being adjacent to I-35 with 35,A0r vehic- les per day presently ttave:isg this highway, that this would be a sat back buffer u+.e. They are ploaning a 65 foot building setback from east property line of office desig- nation, they are trying to keep office area compatible with neighborhood, that structures will be one story with a restdostial type roof. He contisu" that landscaping is .as- ~(i' a€. e F:&`s r s'° '-+v-~' ~*r'?.~Stis..~ ..yp.s yfi. n;'~FTa,; 4:?» w~;7^; :~F . ,R :,.~k''~,€"f• 1355L 6AO R E S O ,L U T I O N WHERUS, Clordie Branch is desirous of donating the )um of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) to the City of Denton for the express purpose of siding and contributing to the construe- tion of a community recreational facility to be located at the intersection of Mortal Newton and Wilson Streets for the benefit of the citizens of Denton; and WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of accepting such Stft and acknowledgas that said sum of money shall be used in accordance with the express wishes of Mr. Branch; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton hereby aocopts the donition of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000,00) by Mr. Clordia Branch and hereby agrees that said sum of money shall be appropriated solely for the purposes of constructing a community recreational facility at the intersection of Morse, Wilson and Newton Streets, said property being more particularly described is follows: All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land out of the Jonathan Brock Survey, Abstract No. 55, Denton County, Texas; BEGIINING at tFa southeast corner of a tzaet of lend t;onvsyrd to J. B)mer Kerley, which beginning point is 161.5 ver:as east of the southwest corner of the Jonathan Brock Survey; THENCE west with the south boundary line of the Jonathan aro^.k Survey, 100 varas to the southeast corner of a 1-acre tract known es the Jerry Jackson Tract; THENCE north with the east boundary line oi' the Jackson Tract, 89.8 varas to corner; THENCE west with the north boundary line of tiie Jackson Tract 61,5 varas to a corner in the west boundary litte of the Jonathan Brock Survey; THENCE north with the west boundary line of the Jonathan Brock Survey, 135.7 varas to a corner in the north boundary line of a tract conveyed to Pemberton and wife to J. Honer Kerley; THEf1CE east with the north boundary lf.ne of said tract 153 varas to the northeast corner of said tract; THENCE south with the east boundary line of acid tract conveyed by Pemberton to J. Homer Kerley 229.5 versa to the place of beginning. SECTION II. The sum of Twelve Thousand Dollars (#12,000.00) shall be placed in Account No. 809-000-6776. 4, e$ i f • SECTION III. The City Council hereby sxprssss~, its appreciation to Mr. branch and the City Secretary is hereby directed to mail a copy of this resolution to Mr. Branch and Councilmember Mark Chew. SECTION IV, Th:t this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the r._„, uay of , 1986. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTONOjTEXAS SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO ',EGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Byl . Az PAGE 2 r Li 1 ="a 19S8L NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF1^ DENTON, • TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS BY ORDINANCE N0. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIL$ TO 1.1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARROLL BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUN OF EAGLE DRIVE AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TU PROVIDE FOR A CWGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM Slul',LE- FAMILY "SF-7" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION,' ESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $19000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable to all or part of the property described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated y reference herein is hereby chnnged from Single-Family "SF-711 District Classification and Use to Planned Development PD District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II, That pprior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any building within the planned development district, the following conditions shall be met; 1. No detached signs shall be permitted. 2. The development and use of the district shall conform and be in substantial ccmpliance with the site plan shown in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Unless otherwise shown in the site plan, the district shall conform to all development standards and regulations appli- cable to of.'ice zoning districts as contained in Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, pro- vided, however, that no building shall exceed two stories in height. 3. No building permits shall be issued and no develop- ment shall begin in that part of the district shown as Phase II in Exhibit 'B" until a comprehensive site plan is submitted and appprove' therefore. A landscaping plan shall be submitted with the compre• hesive site plan for Phase II. 4. No cut in the Carroll Boulevard median shall be L;Ilowed for left turn access to the district for south bound traffic on Carroll Boulevard, SECTION III. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. Y 9 f 4 y Fes: Frr . ~ ~ ya a'fl~7T~r!y. dF`~"41'T$',: ~~.14&`,t.:CF~Fif°~'w-.rL 7'a- '"CC.?.Nr ~.T "ms's-t P`:~~r r.^x^,+s 'y~i°* ~se'Y'4~a •gF}i+~;,..s. ..,."fir 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to sh,,w such change in District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications. • SECTION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas. hereby finds that such change is in secorcanee with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the L'ity of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things or the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens, SECTION V. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a ermir or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdeaeauor punishable by a fine not exceeding one Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record -Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City if Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1486. RICHARD 0. ST"ZOWAKTo MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEE ATTEST: CKARLOTTE XELKR CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON r rTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: Z-1764%PAGE 2 „x , :,'~a 5)h r.. z. a"`..yr "ci'a-y 4r+ix" POMPLEX ATRW w EN0INEERING • LAND PLA "NO • SURVEYN G STAVA"W" "KID- KALMTMAM% P.6.0 ows, "Mom er 7732,2 FI"L7 N 0 T 9 All that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the Alexander hill Survev A»623 in the City of Denton, Texas and being all of Lot 1 Block 1 of the Carroll Point Addition, recorded in Cabinet D Page 202 Plat Records, the remainder of the 11yrtle Addition recorded in Cabinet 8 Page 231 Plat Records and tho remainder of a tract shown by deed to Edna Kays recorded in Yolume 709 1111age 29 Deed ?lecords of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as one tract as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corners of Lot I Block 1 of the Carroll Point Addition; TUENCE South 89 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds East with the :lorth line of said Carroll Point Addition and continuing with the ;North line of said Kays tract 338.13 feet to a point in the 'Vest right-of-way of Myrtle Street; TIVENCE South 01 degrees 34 minutes 17 seconds West with the Kest right-of-way of Xyrtle Street and the East line of the Myrtle Addition 181.69 feet to the southeaut corner of said Myrtle Addition; TIMICE North 89 degrees 3:3 minutes 12 seconds West with the South line of said Nyrtle Addition 161.37 feet to its' most Southerly Southwest corner; T;,ENCC 'forth 00 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds "rest witiz the most Za sterly Nest line of said r'lyrtle Addition a distance of 70.0 feet to the Southeast corner of said Carroll Point Addition; Vfp",NCE Korth 39 degrees 33 minutes 12 seconds ;Jest with the South line of said Carroll Point Addition 127.03 feet to its Southwest corner in the Jortheasterly right-of-way of Carroll Blvd.; TME.tiCE North 22 degrees 00 minutes 43 seconds 'lest with the Northeasterly linrl of Carroll Blvd. 121.0 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 1..066 acres of land. EXHIBIT "A" 1123 FROM WORTH COWS • DENTON. TEXAS 766M • {8171 383-1416 • METRO .430-1882 raaNNaPLY 1 nm, MYAUG A ASMOATM INC. ` MM 1►I w IMN 1 066" blow$ \ MM«I We wrY J I w krA r+rq , i "W" WOO* 1Iw~~ r K E 8 0 L U T 1 0 N WHEttEAS, on Friday, April 18, 1986, the Sesquicentennial Committee is sponsoring a dance to be held on Oak Street (north side of the square) between the intersections of Elm Street and Locust Street; and WHEREAS, all abutting property owners of the street have given their peraission to ,he temporary closing of said street; and WHEREAS, the Sesquicentennial danco is open to the geneval public of of the City and County of Denton; and WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for the said dance and in order to protect the safety of citizens who attend, the City Council of the City of Denton deems it is necessary to temporarily close a portion of Oak Street between Elm Street and Locust Street from the hours of 7:30 P,M. untl 12:00 A.M. on April 1$, 1986; NOW, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D£MTON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Oak Street between Elm Street and Locust Street shall be temporarily closed as a strut or public thoroughfare of any kind or character whatever on April 18, 1986 from 7:30 P.M. until 12:00 A.M. for the purpose of holding a Sesquicentennial dance. WeCTION 11. Tikat the portion of the above described streets shall revert back to the City for noraal traffic activity immediately from and after. 12:00 A.M. on April 18, 1986. SECTION III. That tnis resolution shall take effect and ba in full force and effect: from and after the date of its passaga and approval. PASSES, AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1986. Ric-,HARD 0. STLrWAJLTp MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTF `A CITY OF DMON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LWAL FORM: DEW IDAMI DAAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS T. : 7*Y i . n. .yt:_. STt _v:?rav F'. Zi?sC Trs -cn. Ry!°.~•t~,y .e s+R.r _ y ;.rc d;TeiS,P• ^--•:E..> ff T R I A N G L E S 0 U A R,E S SQ U A R E D A N C E C L U B k "Triangle Squares Celebrates Texas Sesquicentennial" We the under signed businesses agree to close Oak Street (North side 40 of Square) between Elm and Locust on April 18,1986, 7:30 till 12:00 p.m. A Sesquicentennial Dance will be held with Denton and surrounding area people participating, 71 R.~ . ~ ...ELM 3's l q... g~s~~.~r_~oa WHEREAS on Sat.,rday, April 19. 1986, the SiSma Alpha Mu Fraternity is spoasoriog an SpriaS Renaissance to be held on Fry Street between the intersection of Oak and hickory; and WHEREAS, all abutting property owners of the street have • given their permission to the temporary closing of said street; and WHEREAS the Spring Renaissance is open to the general public of of the City and County of Denton; and WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate apace for the said Renaissance and in order to protect the safety of citiseas who attend, the City Council of the City of Denton degas it is necessary to temporarily close a portion of Pry Street between Oak Street and Hickory street from the hours of 8:00 A.M. until 6:30 P.K. on April 19, 1986; NOW, THEREFOAL, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEa)Ns TEXAS: BtCTION I. That Fry Street between Oak Street and Hickory Street shall be temporarily closed as a street or public thoroughfare of any kind or character whatever on April 19 1956 from 8:00 A.K. until 6:30 P.K. for the purpose of holding the Sigma Alpha Mu Spring Renaissance. SECTION II. That the portion of the above described streets shall revert back to the City for normal traffic activity immediately from and after 6:30 P.M. on April 19, 1986. SECTION III. That in the went of rain, said street may be closed on April 26, 1986. SECTION IV. That this resolution shall take effect and be in full force and efitect from and after the date of its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of Ka;ch, 1986. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CRMWM ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORKEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i r yrt S Feb g 86 We, the undersigned merchants of Fry Street, give our per- mission for the oloBing of Fry Street between Oak St, and Hickory St. on April Igth (rain date April 26th) from 8 00a•m, - 6 30 p.m• for the 7th annual Sigma Alpha Mu Fry St. Fair. Proceeds will benefit the United Way of Deovcon• \J 4, / ,'1 J~` ✓y ICJ GCT~ 5 • (,!/L„~~ C.t~'L~-Q..~`r..r l l ] G__-~~' ~f~ taw ~1. f~,~ `Q 8. g• I0. Feb 9 66 We.the undersigned owners of property on Pry Street, give our permission for the closing of Fry Street between Oak 5t. and Hickory Ste on April 19th (rain date April 26th) from 8 00a.m.. 613pp.m, for the 7th annual Sigma Alph Mu Fry St. Fair. Proceeds will benefit the United Way of Denton. 1. 20 3 40 ! 5 . A,, 6. 7. 8. A+55 r s.Tr•3't9 i,~ ri+Y -T§.ilf~3..'.x-'= r,.'ain .a r4]7F4 r ;i"Y° i. _'=_t . ~"'?~3't o O' A E S 0 L U T 1 0 N BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City of Denton, Texas, a Pipe Line License Agreement date, Kwech 1, 2986, between the City of Denton and the Missouri-Ktasas-Texas Railroad Company, relating to the construction, reconstruction, use, maintenance, repair and installation of one twenty-four inch (2411) sanitary sewer pipe line at Mils Post K-725,07, Denton County, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986. RICHARD 0, S-FEWART, MAYOR' CITY OF DENTON,TEXAS ATTEST: CF&=TTE ALLEN CITY SZCRETW CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS BY:IYl2 /AlLf tb► U 11 PIPE LINE LICENSE THIS AGREEMENT No +m& this 1ft day of March .19 86 between the MISSOURI•XI4*4SAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY, hereinafter called "Licensor", and :0 CITY OF QENTON•,TEXAS hereinafter called "Licensee", WITNESSETH; ARTICLS I. J=s This agreesent shall take effect the date hereof, and unless soc:ur terni- aated as provided herein, shall continue in force to tons as used for the purpose herein set out for a period of ten (10) years, or until terminated by either party giving the other party not less than thirty (30) days' advance notice in writing of an intention to terminate the same, the agreement to terminate upon the estpiration of such term or notice, whichever oceure first. Licensee is hereby given a renewal option at a price and term to be negotiated nc sooner than 120 days or less than 30 days prior to the expiration of this term. In the event the amount of renegotiated rental is not agreed to in writing by both parties, prior to the expiration of the term of this license, this license shall automati- cally terminate without notice, affective the last day of the expiring taiu. 2. Consideration ass/ DekApdoe: to consideration of ONE THOUSAND' 100E HUNDRED NINETY AND NO/100------------- - - (I - 1.390.00 ) DOLLARS receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and of the covenants of Licensee as hereinafter set forth, Licensor hereby grants a license and permission to Licensee to construct, reconstruct, use, maintain, operate„ repair and install by ` boring method, one pipe lines(s) encased in a carrier pipe not exceeding twenty-four 24,!•~ inches in diameter, to be used for carrying- - sanitan sewer across or along Licensor's propnrty at or near Denton gn the County of Denton and State of Texas _ For convenience, the said pipe line is hereinafter referrad to as "Grossing". The location of said Crossing is more particularly described as follows; Said twenty-four {24111 inch sanitary sewer pipe line crosses said Railroad Company's premises at an angle of 87 degrees, 30 minutes, more or less, measured to the right, tangent to curve, from the centerline of said Railroad Company's Denton Subdivision main track at Mile Post K-725.0.7, being main track valuation chaining station 1743 plus 23.6. distant 192.5 feet, more or less, measured southerly, along the centerline of said maim track from the south headwall of Bridge No. K-.725, chaining station 1745 plus 16.11. Said pipe line is not within the limits of a public crossing, I • 5:~~~. A 1 . r lei IL Licensee undertakes and agrees: 1. Soee ications: To instal said Crossing according to the speLirkations of the American Railway Engineering Asiwaation Part s. Pipelines. The Crossing shall be laid and maintained at the sole cost of Licensee, and in a rnaoner and with material satisfactory to Licensors Chief Engineer, .wth its topaz least five and one-half (1,J) feet beneath the base of the rail under the tracks and at least five sacs one-half(i-1/2) last below the surface of the ground elseAere, so it will not interfere with the safe operation of said railroad or cause damage to Licensor's property. Said pipe line shall be encased in a larger pipe where it passes tinder any railroad tracks and for at least twenty-five (2S') feet on each side of the center line of any such track. 2. Present Occupants: To make appropriate arrangements with any person or Legal entity rcupying the premises affected hereby pursuant to a lease or oth: permission granted by Licensor, so that Licensee's said Crossing will not unreasnnably interfere with the use of the subject property, or create undue hardship cn the person or legal entity occupying the premises. 3. UabiMy: Licensor shall not be liable for any damage to said Cr--wssingtorthe contents th; mof, howsoever such damage shall be caused, whether by the negligence of Licensor, its agents, employees, or otherwise. Licensee assumes the risk of, and shall protect, indemnify and hold harmless Licensor,from and against all liability for or on account of injury to or death of any and all persons or damage to property, including livestock killed or injured, resulting from or incident to liteconsiruction, maintenance, use. operation, relocation, reconstruction orexistence of said Crossing on Licensor's premises, or the removal thereof from said premises, or to the restrrstion of or failure to restore said premises to their prior or other condition as herein provided, whe►hrr such injury, death or damage shall be caused or contributed to by the negligence of Licensor, its agents, employees or otherwise, and Licensee will protect, indemnify and hold harmless Licensor and any others legally using its right of way, from all claims, demands, suits or actions growing out of any such loss, injury or demands, including investigation costs, court costs, and attorneys' fees resulting or in any manner arising from the risks herein assumed by Licensee. Licensee further agrees to immediately inv,--,:gate any such claims, demands, or suits and shall defend, settle, and, or otherwise dispose of the same at its sole cost and expense. In the event licensee settles any such claims, demands, or suits, it shall obtain a release which includes Licensor. Licensee shall not have or make against Licensor any claim or demand for or on account of any damage Licensee may suffer or sustain because of any failure of Licensee's title to the right of way and lands occupied by said Crossing or any part thereof, 4, Waiver: To welve all right to question the validity of this License or any of the terms or provisions hereof, or the right or power of Licensor to execute and enforce the same, ARTICLE 111. it is mutually agreed by and between the parties, as follows: V(s) Repairs and Relocation: Licensee will at all times maintain the Crossing in a safe and securt manner, and in a condition satisfactory to Licensor, Licensor ma request Licensee to change the location of the Crossing, or any part thereof, or to make reasonable repairs as in the judgement of Licensor shall be deemed necessary to avoid interference with or danger in the use or operation of Licensoe's railroad, or any of its present or future appurtenances, or telegraph, telephone, signal or other lines on Licensor's right of way, and in the event it is found necessary for Licensorto use its entire right of way, or any portion of it occupied by the Crossing, Licensee shall at its sole expense, and within thirty (30)daysafter notice so to do, (or upon shorter notice incaw of emergency), remove said Crossing, or as much of the Crossing as is located upon that portion of the right of way so required by Licensor. (b) If Licensee shall fail to perform any of its obligations contained in this agreement to the maintenance of safe conditions in and about said Crossing ores to the protection of wires from electrical interference on Liomnsor's property or to make any necessary repairs, or to relocate said Crossing, then Licensor may cause such condition to be made safe, orchange of location to be made, or repairs to be made, or Crossing to be removO from Licensor's property, Licensor acting as the agent of Licensee, and may perform such work as is necessary in the judgemet• i of Licensor, and Licensee shall, on demand, promptly reimburse Licensor the whole cost thereof, plus ten (IWO per cent theieon as a charge for supervision, accounting, and use of tools: or Licensor may terminate this License by giving to Licensee not !,.,u than ten (10) days' advance written notice of its intention so to do, 2. Termination: Licensor may terminate this License upon ten (10) days' written notice if Licensee fails to keep any of Licensee's covenants herein contained, or if the right of way is required for other purposes by Licensor, and no reimbursement shall be made (or Licensee's expenxs incurred in the removal of this crossing or the consideration paid for this License, No termination orexpiration shall affect the rights and liabilities, if any, of the parties hereto then existing, 3. Reaor. llon: Upon the termination of this agreement, whether in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Amick I, or Paragraph 2 or d of Article III, or otherwise, Licensee shall promptly remove said Crossing from Lieensor's right of way and stone fi- ie:: fight of way to its pnor condition, or to a condition wtisfooory to Licensor. If Licensee OwU fail to remove said Crossing within thirty (30) days after the termination of this asteemni Licensor may ritaim the saute, and charge the expense therefor to the Licensee on the bask provided In Paragra 1(b) of Article Ill. • " i/If "OT e e 4, 'Wkceibsuouw (a) This License and all of the provisions herein contained shall be binding upon the parties hereto. :heir hei-s, executors, administrators, successor and assigns, and Licensee agrees to supply notice in writing to Licensor of any i.ame changes, Licensee agrees not to assign Ihis License or any interest therein, without the consent of Licensor in writing, and any and every such attempted assignment without such prior written consent shall be void and of no effect. In the event of any assignment, Licensee shall at all times remain fully responsible and liable for the payment of the rental, ifany, herein specified and for the compliance of all of Its other obligations under the terms, provisions, and covenants of this License, (b) In the event rent is paid annually, Licensor expressly reserves the right to increase the above rental rate on any yearly anniversary date of this license by giving Licensee thirty(30) days' written notice, Licensor may increase the rental by the percentage that the Consumer Price Index has increased, published by the Department of Labor, since the last rental increase period, or the last anniversary date hereof. (c) The personal pronouns used herein as referring to Licensee shall be understood so to refer to Licensee whether Licensee be a natural person, a partnership, or a Corporation, or any combination thereof. iven Licensor to Licensee sall be deli a edn otiLicensee or his authoriizegd agent, or if posted on or if mailled po pad properly given known place of business, to Licensee at upon is last (e) No oral promises, oral agreements, or oral warranties shall be deemed a part of this License, nor shall anyaIteration, amendment, supplement, or waiver of any of the provisions of this license be binding upon either party hereto unless the same be supplemented, altered, changed, or amended by an instrument in writing, signed by Licensor and Iicen.w. (f) This License does not become binding upon Licensor until executed by Licensor's vice-president. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of thedayand year first ahorewritten. MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY By _ Vice. President CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS By Title Flavor Address; 21S E. McKinney St, Denton, Texas 76201, Fill; T-18753-8 -3- Or Al ~ cs 47 'lei - n~ c4 - - Br, /Y ° Tim 1 r ~¢f FJ S `vme ~ ~fv`_ `i~VJ CI`OOIr Swll < r Milt 06L hrrnm S}~}ian 'K , 07 ~ 174srt c IN #P # qtr `/fir r• ~~Jr 7~e '