Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-09-1986 4WD N C~ C~u,n~C11 x,194 ~ f I AGENDA ' CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL is September 9, 1986 Joint Work Session of the City of Denton City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, September 9, 1986 at 5:30 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the 1unicipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p. M. 1. Hold a diacussion of intensity policies in eastern Denton between U.S. Highway 380 and 1-35. 2. Hold a discussion of the first come - first serve intensity allocation procedure. Special Called .Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, September 9, 1986, at 7:00 p,m. in the Council Chambers of the Junicipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7:UU p.m. 1. Resolutions: A. Consider adoption of a resolution allocating $.02 . of the tax rate to the General Debt Service Fund only. 1. Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the tax rate for fiscal year 1986-87. a. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan instituting annexation of approximately 132.64 acres of land being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and part of the W. Durham Survey, Abstract No. 300, and beginning at a point approximately one mile south of FM 426 (East McKinney) and one and one-half miles north of 1-35E. (A-37) 2. Consider authorizing the Aayor to establish a Denton Bicentennial of the United States Constitution Committee. 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the reorganization proposal for Lite County Health Department. Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, September 9, 1986, in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: City of Denton City Council Agenda September 9, 1986 Page Two 1. Receive a report on the 1986 City Council goals and priorities; Y6 Flow Hospital 2nd half #+2 Economic Development #4 Space 2. Executive Session: A. Legal ,Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. b252-17 V.A.T.S. - Discussion of legal issues concerning indigent care order Art. 4438f. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V. A.I.S. C. Personnel/ Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 3. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters 0. Real Estate C. Personnel/Board Appointments C E K T I F G A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City o/fjventon, Texas, on the day of 1986 at o' clock (a.m.) (p. m.) v-+ C Y S.C.ETAKY 23710 r EMEKQENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA SEPTEABEK 9, 1986 The necessity of this emergency addendum being the urgent public necessity of hiring a municipal fudge. 1. Consider the selection of a municipal judge. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin boa d at the Cit Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of %~1GP~ 1986 at cP-'~10 o'clock Z77' CIT 5 RSTAKY '13760 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL September 9, 1986 Joint Work Session of the City of Denton City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, September 9, 1986 at 5130 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considereds 5:30 p, m, 11 Hold a discussion of intensity policies in eastern Denton between U.S. Highway 380 and I-35. 2. Hold a discussion of the first come - first serve Intensity allocation procedure. Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, September 9, 1986, at 7100 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considereds 7tUO p.m. 1. Resolutionss A. Consider adoption of a resolution allocating $.U2 of the tax rate to the General Debt Service Fund only. 2. Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting the tax rate for fiscal year 1986-87, B. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan instituting annexation of approximately 131.64 acres of land being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and part of the W. Durham Survey, Abstract No. 300, and beginning at a point approximately one mile south of FM 426 (East McKinney) and one and one-half miles north of I-35L. (A-37) 1. Consider authorizing the Mayor to establish a Denton Bicentennial of the United States Constitution Committee. 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion on the reorganisation proposal, for the County Health Department. Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, Septe sber 9, 19865 in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal building at which the following items will be considereds City of Denton City Council Agenda September 9, 1986 Page Two 1. Receive a report on the 1986 City Council goals and priorities #6 Flow Hospital 2nd half #2 Economic Development i4 Space 2. Executive Sessions A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. - Discussion of legal issues concerning indigent care order Art. 4438f. b. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.'Y.S. C. Personnel/board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 3. official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel/board Appointments C E n T I F 1 C A T E I certify that the above uotice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at. the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1986 at _ o'clock (a.m.) CITY SECRETARY 2371C 6''3D DATE: 09/09/86 j CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT fu: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJE~[: Uiscussion of intensity policies in eastern Denton between U.S. Highway 380 and I-36 RLCUMMENOATIUN: The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a study session on August 6, 1986. The Commission concluded that three moderate nodes should be created. The nodes would be established at U.S. Highway 38U, McKinney Street, and 1-35. The Commission requested that the recommendation be forwarded to the City Council in a joint study session. The Land Use Committee's preliminary recommendation indicates no more than three (3) moderate nodes in this area. SUMMARY: In early 198b, the City Council considered a zoning request on 703 acres. Two additional requests ahutting t4 703 acres were submitted to the City but were withdrawn by the petitioner prior to a Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. BACKGRUUND: On June 2b, 1966, representatives of Miller of Texas, Inc. provided staff with a revised land lan that included all three zoning re- quests oit property from U.,. Highway 38U to Paige/Pockrus Road. The staff reviewed the proposal and provided the Miller of Texas repre- sentatives with the staff comments on the proposal. One conrment stated that the Commission and Council must establish policies for this area before staff could make a recommendation on the land use question. 'fhe petitioner suggested establishing a continuous moderate node trom north of Paige/Pockrus Road to north of McKinney Street (353 acres), a moderate node at Mills Road (ZO3 acres), and a high intensity area at U.S. Highway 38U (220 acres), and the petition suggested adding Corps of Engineers' property (not in the city) to the areas to reduce the intensity. This position does not conform with any Development Guide policies, including the size of a moderate area which may be expanded to a maximum of 260 acres. Prior to the June 25, 1986 meeting, the staff and petitioners had negotiated for months to design moderate nodes that would conform to city policies. In addition, since the scheduling of the study session with the Commission, the staff has received a request to schedule Z-1800 and Z-1801 for public hearings as soon as possible. CC Format Sheet Sep'.A..5er 9, 1986 Page 2 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All departments involved in the development process, individuals residing in this area, and the citizens of Denton. FISCAL IWAC't: The fiscal impact is difficult to assess due to phasing of any possible developpment and the economic situation at the time of development. fhe City of Denton would experience both costs and benefits; however, increased growth in the eastern quadrant could impact the development in other areas of the city which could affect the need for additional city services and capital improve- ment funding in those areas. Res ectf ully submitted: l~ oy areI City Manager Prepared by: Ueci le -Carson Urban Planner App ved, et y Director of Planning and Development I y♦Nrr.~ -YYY. ••I R r-r V $LAG 41p,d Me nn! _ NNE 4♦ ;'t = t , f4$ 426 7' 't' !v!• d MOyhill_. communitf. '(C 0 " ),0 bl,V 2161,::. , Ploakrub it CHORE '.IPP 343 :i i•• ! •too sk Rd: ow l l~ ' t CORI T'H POP ~S1 / • Old 3s INTENSITY POLICY EASTERN DENTON t. LOW INTENSITY AREAS These areas are 43% higher or more intense in Denton than in other cities (based on standard neighborhood). 11. MODERATE INTENSITY AREAS 't'hese areas are 100% under or less inten<e; in Denton than the typical four corner commercial intersection of other cities. 111. WUH INTENSITY AREAS These areas are consistent with high commercial and employment centers in other cities. 1V. EASTERN DENTON - UNIVERSITY, 1-35, BELL AVENUE QUADRANT A. Population 1985 - 11,337 2010 - 28,577 Second largest area with a 201 growth factor. B. Land Use 1985 Single family 616 acres Multi-family 88 acres Commercial/retail 165 acres industrial 110 acres institutional "22U acres transportation/other 385 acres 2010 Single family 853 acres Multi-family 121 acres Commercial/retail 228 acres Industrial 152 acres Institutional 304 acres Transportation/other 533 acres V. LAND PLAN/GUIDE POLICIES Policies are enforced by staff in recommendations to Planning and Zoning Commission and Commission recommendations to City Council. Intensity Policy Eastern Denton Page 2 VI. RECUMMI;NDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the establishment of three (3) moderate nodes located at University Drive, McKinney Street, and I-35. other options given to the Commission were to have no nodes but the consensus was that this was not good planning. Another option was to create five nodes but the Commission felt this would create a strip moderate node from University Drive to 1-35. VII. OTHER CoNSIDERATIONS A. Shift-Land Balance to East Denton The growth policy of the City of Denton would be shifted from one of balanced growth In all quadrants to one that emphasizes growth in the eastern quadrant. As indicated by the Commission the mail area has already shifted growth from downtown and University Drive to the Loop 288-I-35 area, B. Uversize Utilities The more intense and dense the area the more need for oversizing lines and adding facilities. If the area receives an excess amount of public funds then improvement in other areas will be delayed. The utility improvements are also directly tied to the balance of growth. C. 'rransportation The thoroughfare plan indicates that Mills and Blagg Roads are collector streets. Colorado Boulevard is a secondary major and McKinney Street is a primary major arterial. Moderate areas are typically recommended at the intersection of two primary major arterials. 1346j P $ Z Minutes August 6, 1986 Page I. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT UP THH 11OLBHRT-10YATT ADDITION, Lots 1 and STAFF REFORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this is a 6.114 acre paiC-ar-TUF-is located adjacent and east of 1-35E approxi- mately 588 feet south of Paige Road and west of the MK6T Railroad. A request foP commercial (C) zoning has been ap- proved by ,.:,e City Council. 'rho owners are proposing an automobil•. dealership and are seeking plat appruval for site preparation purposes. He said that a 12" water main extension is proposed across the property frontage; it will connect to an existing 8" water main north of Paige Road. An existing 14" sanitary sewer line runs through the property and will provide adequate service. On-site detention will be required. A Lou foot Texas Municipal Power Agency easement and transmission line bisects the property. Trees and shrubs over 15 feet in height and structures over 20 feet in height are prohibited within 50 feet oi` center line of the transmission line. Ile said that the Development Review Committee recommends approval. Mr. Claiborne asked how they could tie Into an 8" line with a 12" line. Mr. Ham stated that they could not legally make them put in a 16" Inch as proposed ip future roaster plan. Mr. Kammen asked about the on site detention. Mr. Salmon stated that there would need to be detention downstream and this is the purpose for the culverts under the rail- road and pond in the back of the propety. DHC131UN: Ms. Cole moved to recommend approval of the pre- TTmrary plat of the Holbert-Wyatt Addition, Lots 1 and 2, block 1. Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (7-O) 11. WORK SESSION A. D15CUSSIUN OF INTENSITY POLICIES IN EAST' DEN'rON between ~(3 U79`Hig way 38Vand- aTge7Yocfcrus`koa-ra-T ng proposed north/south arterial in Lakeview project (Z-1779, Z-1800 and Z-1801). S'1'AFh RhpuR'r: Ms. Carson stated that the 1980 Development UU-Me cons ered Mayhill Road as the boundary for develop- ment; however, the Guldu states that property not desJgna- ted at a high or moderate area is a low area unless the Commission recommends and Council creates a high or moder- ate area. She added that there has been property annexed in this area but the area includes a large amount of unan- nexed property also. She said that the Commission needed to look at the distance between the moderate areas and their locations. She said that the east quadrant of the city is between University, I-3S, Bell Avenue and the lake, She said that the population in the area for 1985 is ap- proximately 11,000 and the population estimated for the year 2010 is approximately 29,000. She said that the area is estl w ad to have a 204 increase and will be the second largest area in the city. Sbe said that the land use for the year 2010 in acres is the following; 8S3 acres of sin- gle family, 121 acres of multi-family, 218 acres of commer- cial/general retail 1SZ acres of industrial, 304 acres of institutional and Sh acres of roads, parks, schools, etc. She said that the low intensity areas in Denton are 431 In Jntensiry higher than in other cities and the moderate In- tensity areas are 1001 lower in intensity than the four cosrner neighborhood and shopping areas in other cities, She added that the Development Guide designates four high intensity areas and they are located in the northwest quad- rant, the airport, the downtown area and the Loop/1-35, Z Minutes August o, 1986 Page S Mr. Holt asked about the property proposed for light In- dustrial purposes in this area. Ms. Carson stated that the property between Woodrow Lane and the Loop is included in the eastern quadrant. Air. Holt asked about the land use in the area at present. Ms. Carson stated that east of Mayhill and north of McKinney there Is presently a school site existing devel- opment on Pockrus Road includes a mobile home subdivision, to the south Is single family, there is scattered commer- cial development along Highway 380, and the remainder Is scattered residential and farms, but substantial develop- ment ends at Mayhill Road. She said that the land use fig- ures for 1985 are as follows: 616 acres of single family, 88 acres of multi-family, 165 acres of commercial/general retail, li0 acres of industrial and 605 acres of institu- tional, roads, parks, schools, etc. She said that the City of Denton thoroughfare plan shows Blagg and Mills roads as collector streets, McKinney and Colorado streets as primary major arterials and highway 380 as a major ar- terial. She said that there are zoning requests In this area and staff needs direction. She said that the Commis- sion had four options: to make three moderate areas, let current trend prevail, make it less than low or encourage no development in this area. She sold that the southern part of the Miller of 'fexas project was withdrawn from the agenda on May 28, 1986 and on June 25 Miller of Texas presented the staff with a proposal that cyanged the entire proposal from north to south, She said that staff would recommend that no action be taken on the proposal until the policy had been established and informed the petitioner that the staff would recommend a study session. Ms. Brock asked if a moderate area meant a node, Ms. Carson said yes, a 30 acre node that can be ex- panded If diversity is provided to a maximum of 250 acres. Mr. Holt asked about distance and policy, Ms. Carson stated that the moderate areas should be located at two major primary arterials. Ms. Brock stated that they are trying to establish policy because of the pressures in this area. lie. Carson stated that they would be establishing policy for the Development Guide but the Land Use Planning Com- mittee may decide to recommend a different policy. She said that If the Commission approves a policy of higher intensity the need for utilities and oversizing would increase the cost to the developer and the city. She added that roads would need to be improved or upgraded if nigher intensity and density are proposed. Ms. Brock asked about lowering Intensity. Ms. Carson stated that it is difficult. She said that the only me- thod to decrease is enforcing the curb cut ordinance, not oversizing utilities or spending C1P funds in this area. She said that this can only be done if a coordinated ef- fort Is made throughout the city. Ms. Brock stated intensity is fairly high with the Devel- opment Guide and she would like to see intensity reduced whenever possible, She stated that she is concerned about the change in uses and therefnre increases in Intensity such as the proposal for the psychiatric hospital even though a hospital was existing, they now have more em- ployees which means more traffic. Ms. Carson stated that P 8 'L Minutes August o, 1986 Page 4 it is not a significant difference. She said that the Land Use Planning Committee had an all day session to consider and establish policies and the Committee showed three or less moderate areas along the north/south arterial on what could be considered a moderate area. She added that the staff Initially recommended three areas as moderate. Mr. Holt asked how long before the Land Use Planning Com- mittee is finished. Ms. Carson said six months. Mr. Holt asked about coordinating efforts, Ms. Carson si,ated the Commission may consider the preliminary results of the Land Use Planning Committee. Mr. Holt asked about the present growth of the city. Ms. Carson stated that the southeast is the fastest growing with the east and northeast second and third, respectively, She said then the northwest from Highway 77 down to Scripture. She said that the southwest is the slowest In regards to growth. She said that the Commis- sion should decide If this area needs more moderate nodes which weans more population, residences, multi-family units, commeroial and industry. She said that it is a matter of trade-off because growth would be taken from other areas of the city and added to the east. Ms. Brock stated that there are more apartments in the city than single family according to information given to the Commission, Mr. Holt asked if the population included the students and the dorms, Ms. Carson said yes because the unit exists even If the student changes. She said that it is difficult to determine if the student lives here or commutes. Mr. Holt asked about the occupancy of apartments, Ms. Carson stated that Council of Governments figures are broadly based and not up to date. She said that the most recent COO study of apartments In the city is 92% befor- the addition of Mack Place, Pace's Crossing and Sunburst 11. She said that the larger complexes offer more ameni- ties which tends to reduce the occupancy rate of small apartment complexes. Site added that 750 apartments could be built in a moderate area. She said that the apartment issue is some what scattered and the emphasis of the Committee is to decrease apartment units for a variety of reasons. Mr. Holt asked about the taxes paid by those in apartments and those in single family homes, Ms. Carson stated that an in-depth research had not been done, Ms, Brock asked to what degree did land go up in value with apartments. Ms. Carson stated that there is a dis- crepancy with the tax appraisal district because they base taxes on location, not land use, Mr. Kamman asked about the cases being considered (Z-1779, Z-19UO and Z-1901) and what the Commission needed to do, Ms, Carson said that the Commission needed to determine if moderate intensity areas are needed In this area. She said that three moderate areas were considered and the possible addition of two more is an alternative of five areas; how- ever, staff felt the five areas are less acceptable. Mr. Claiborne asked where the land intersected with 1.35, Ms, Carson said at the Shady Shores Bridge. She said that the petitioner is proposing an outer Loop to connect with the City of Corinth, Mr. Holt asked if expansion of the moderate areas would be recommended to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City P i Z Minutes August 6, 1966 Wage 5 Mr, Claiborne asked about the Land Use Planning Committee's projection for this area. Ms. Carson stated that only one group discussed specific policies for this at-ea. Mr. Claiborne stated that the city has two areas that arfi becoming very intense; one, along 1-35 from the truck stop at Highway 77 to Lake Dallas, and the other from Foster Road south to Robinson Road, Mr. Persaud stated that Group 3 had light industrial, single family and a park. Group 1 had single family and commercial on Highway 380 and multi -family,single family and commercial on McKinney, Group 1 had single family.on McKinney and commercial and multi-family on 1-35. The remainder of the property was indentified as single family by all groups. Mr. Holt asked how do they know if the proposed moderate nodes will redirect growth from other areas to the east. Mr. Claiborne stated that the Golden Triangle Mall area is an example of a pull. Mr. Kamman asked if it would be a policy pull or develop- ment pull. Ms. Carson stated that it depended on the transportation, utilities and capital improvement program in the area, Ms. Brock stated that policies set in the past were not followed and that policy decisions are made by the City Council on recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Ms. Carson stated that it is the trend in some areas to vary the policies but that most of the time the policies have been followed, Mr. Claiborne asked for the uses in the moderate areas as to commercial or general retail, Roger Barrett, Metroplex Engineering Corporation, stated that present uses in the general retail don't cover some of the commercial uses. He said that they need some of the commercial uses to create diversity, gg mercialszoningtis easierctoimarketobutethatethe land uses proposed are actually general retail uses. She said that the June 25 proposal had high intensity at Highway 390 and the new road and moderate area at Mills, McKinney, Colorado and I-3S. Ms. Brock stated that they were not looking at specifics but desirable land use policy. Mr, Barrett stated that they would like specific wording because the petitioner is trying to get an appraisal to do the road. He said a commercial class in an appraisal has a higher value. He said they need this classification to obtain bond money ti start the road, Ms. Carson stated that for a Road Utility District the city gives preliminary approval of the alignment of the road before the state can accept the proposal. Ms. Carson stated that the petitioner wants the highest and best use for more taxes. She said that the bonds for the Road Utility District are based on the value of the land. Ms. Brock asked if they were voting on th& policy, Ms. Carson said that it is an option. She said that the Commission could make a recommendation to be presented to the City Council in the form of a resolution. P 4 Z Minutes August o, i9ab Page 6 Mr. Holt stated that if they left it low intensity then Miller of Texas would not have a plan. Ms. Carson stated that three of the moderate nodes are justified but that the additional two nodes would put all the nodes in close proximity. Ms. Brock stated that with five nodes they would be • creating a large moderate strip, Mr. Haw stated that this would have an effect on utilities because the master water plan shows development out to the Loop, not beyond, lie said that Lakeview would have to put in utilites and the city would participate In oversizing. lie said that the master sewer plan does extend to the lake. Mr, Claiborne asked if it would have an effect on other quadrants of the city. Mr. Ham stated that based on the current uniform plan of quadrants they will be building a future water plant and an addition to the sewer plant. He said extension and trunk lines would be most affected, but improvements in the eastern quadrant would redirect growth in this area. Mr. Kamman asked if the lake forming a boundary would af- fect development. Ms. Larson stated that there Is a lot of land left to develop and it would have to be divrrse. Mr. Claiborne stated that it was easy to control growth with utilities and roads. Ms. Brock asked about the remodeling of Downtown Denton and development in the older neighborhoods. Ms. Carson stated that the Land Use Planning Committee gave these items high priority on the responses to the questionnaire. She said the Committee stated that the activity centers should be dispersed throughout the city, the downtown area needed revitalizing, and the older neighborhoods needed improvements. She added that over 90% wanted balanced growth in all quadrants of the city. Ms. Brock stated tnat she felt the lake has a tremendous pull but the Increased development would be creating a suburb of Dallas. Mr. Claiborne stated that he agreed that the area as low intensity is not wise but that he had misgivings about too many moderate nodes. He said that he wished the case could wait until the Land Use Planning Committee had completed its revision but realizes that a decision must be made. He said that he ' favor three moderate nodes at University, McKir,.._ and 1.3S. He said that he would have a hard time approving moderate nodes at Edwards and Mills . Dir. Escue stated that he would encourage lower density if possible and not high intensity land uses. Mr. Ham stated that the three moderate nodes would Impact the utilities and city as a whole. Mr. Claiborne moved to request a joint study session with the City Council for development of interim policies in the eastern quadrant of the city. Mr. Escue stated that he would agree on the three moderate areas. Mr. Holt stated that he felt there is a need for three moderate areas with the remainder as low intensity. Motion was seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried DATE: 09/09/86oZ CITY COUNCIL REPORI FORMAT TU: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Discussion of the first come - first serve intensity allocation procedure RECUMMENUATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a study session on August b, 1986 and recommended a procedure to eliminate the first come - first serve intensity allocation practice. SUMMARY: The Denton Development Guide is based on intensity policies or the traffic generated by specific land uses in an area. In several areas of the City one tract of property has been zoned causing all of the intensity to be used in the intensity area. In the areas where intensity is over the standard, the remaining land owners must zone their property the least intense land use not to increase the intensity problem. uACKUNUUND: The Development Guide contains a provision stating that the Planning and Zoning Commission should conduct a study session to focus on the intensity question and the need and impact of changing the standard or allocating all the intensity. The attached document provides an approach to eliminate the first come - first serve practice. NROURAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All departments involved in the development process, developers, land owners, and citizens. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact can be determined at this time. Re ectfu ly submitted: ~V/l 449611W 4--- City Manager Prepared by: Cecile Carson Urban Planner ,App ed4 Jeff Neyer'3 -3 am Director of Plan'n ng and Development tIEYIWW Of INTENSITY ALLOCATION 'traditional zoning system Use of zoning; i.e., to zone because of individuals or specific development solution Change zoning system - Land Use Planning Committee will consider alternative zoning methods Alternative Solution "Band aid" approach - Based on current system A. Intensity allocation question Step it - If a zoning request involves a substantial question about intensity then, according to the Development Guide, the request should be tabled by the Commission or staff should inform the Commission about the question prior to the public hearing. Step t2 - The boundaries of the intensity area should be examined. Step d9 - The planning procedures for entire study area should be reviewed. The reserve could be increased, No first come, first serve policy exists in current Development Guide. Step N4 - If area is zoned over the intensity standard, this is a red flag for planning. The land use should be the least intense land use that is possible. The area can be controlled with the capital improvement program, utility planning and subdivision regulations, specifically curb cuts and transportation access to the area. B. Emphasize concentration and separation policies, multi-family and nonresidential. C. Consider other Development Guide policies. dotes Intensity is a planning system and not a computer system, therefore, it is not exact. Intensity is an estimate of the traffic generation based on existing land use and zoning. Separate policies or standards my be necessary for areas that are predominately built and for those that are predominately vacant or zoned agricultural. The development sohedule, available infrastructure and existing land use should be considered. 1505s Y 6 2 Minutes August 6, 1986 Page 7 DISCUSSION 0' CRITERIA to use to eliminate the first come, first ve`f-RTerff?fy-allocation. Ms. Carson stated that there is a somewhat non-existent policy of first come, first serve, She said that the problem occurs when a proposal uses up all the intensity but does not exceed the intensity, She said that staff recommends approval because it does not technically vio- late the Guide. She said that there is no specific solu- tion but that they could try a "band aid" approach or staff could do in-depth re-search on the subject prior to another work session. Mr. Fanning stated that they are using the traditional zoning system that was written in 1917 which is design specific. He said that the problem of the system is that the city is zoning individuals instead of land, He said that the solution is to change the zoning system and the Land Use Planning Committee Is looking at alternative zoning methods. He said that staff is recommending a "band aid" approach that current policy be followed. He stated If a zoning request involves a question about in- tensity then, according to the Development Guide, the re- quest should be tabled by the Commission. He added that an intensity question could be reviewed prior to the pub- lic hearing. He said that the second step is to have a work session and examine the boundaries of the intensity area. He said that the third step is to look at planning procedures for the total study area. He sold that the in- tensity reserve allocation could be increased. He added that no first come, first serve policy exists in the Guide. He said that step four states that if the area is zoned over the intensity standard this is a red flag for land planning, he said that development in the area can be controlled by capital improvement funds utillty planning, and subdivision regulations, specifically curb cuts and transportation access to the area. He added that the Commission should emphasize concentration and separation policies for both multi-family and non-residential uses and consider other Development Guide policies, Ms. Brock asked if it is possible to change the system. Mr. Fanning stated that in Colorado some cities have a permit system. He added that there are several different approaches to take to start the change. Ms. Brock asked what.they as a Commission could do now. Mr. Fanning stated that they should take the dramatics away from the meeting and gather all information that they can before the public hearing, Mr. Claiborne said that he encourages each Commissioner to go to the City Council and argue the land issue. He said that the Commission needed to make sure the developer is concerned about growth and committed to Denton. He added that the city staff must abide by the Guide, Ms. Carson stated that in the past the staff did not en- force the Guide policies and because of that numerous problems are being encountered today, Mr. Claiborne stated that when he was appointed to the Commission Mr. Meyer encouraged first come, first serve . He said that it is more practice than policy but the staff had encouraged the practice until recently. Mr. Holt stated that if the development doesn't violate the intensity policy but uses up all the intensity maybe the Guide is being misinterpreted. F Y Z Minutes August 6, 1986 Page d Ms. Carson stated that the Development Guide allows flexi- bility and the staff did not plan for what was left in an area when a case was considered but now the staff is raking an effort to point out all the facts to the Commission In the reports. Mr. Fanning stated that the system is set up by mathemati- cal calculations to provide flexibility and not Intended ' to be an answer. He said that the intent of the numbers Is to give a red fla to the Commission that there might be a problem in the future. He said that if the area Is zoned over the intensity standard, this is a red flag.for land planning. He said that the land use in those areas over the standard should be the least Intense land use that is reasonable. He said that the area ran be con- trolled with the capital improvement program, utility planning and subdivision regulations. Ms. Brock asked if there are examples of cases where one corner gets all the intensity and it is legitimate planning. Mr. Fanning said that the Commission might want to reserve the floodplain areas as natural areas and therefore give an increase in the intensity to preserve the area, Mr. Holt stated that with the "band aid" approach, the Commission could have staff bring a problem to their at- tention and have a study session. Mr. Fanning stated that it would be an automatic table, Mr. Holt asked if they could table two or three items and have a study session, Ms. Carson said it might be possible to delay the public hearing until the study session is held. Mr. Holt asked If this would help development, Ms. Carson stated that some developers had forced the staff to proceed with a request before it was ready, She said that she felt it would help everyone because the petitioner would under- stand the policies and decisions for planning in the area. The staff would benefit because the petitioner would be re- quired to wait until the study session before the public hearing is scheduled which would eliminate confusion at the public hearing. Mr. Fanning stated that the Commission could discuss the area before the public hearing and vote on the policy and this way the developer would know where he stood. Ms. Brock stated that, for an example, Mr. Button's property on the northwest corner of Hickory Creek Road and Teasley Lane used up the intensity , She said that a good plan was presented for the intersection of Teasley Lane and Loop 288, but she voted against it because Mr. Button had used the intensity. Ms. Carson stated that the staff preferred a residential development next to old Alton Estates and Old Alton Estates wanted protection from the city, therefore, the idea was to put the intensity on the north side of Hickory Creek Road. She added it was more intense but another staff member had negotiated with Mr. Button prior to the submittal and requesting a reduction would have presented some problems. Mr, Fannin stated that the whole area needed to be taken into consideration and all types of factors, that other staff members had also interfered with the process. Ms. Brock stated that the Commission and staff were under a lot of pressure. P 6 Z minutes August 6, 1986 Yage 9 Mr. Fanning stated that they could buy zoning, backzone, or put time limits on planned developments. Ms. Carson stated that in areas,where zoning is in place and no development has occurred the staff could review areas over the standard to remove the decision from the political arena and recommend fo rezone for planning reasons. Mr, Holt asked if the City could zone on its own motion. Mr. Claiborne said that the city could. Ms. Brock stated that there was a controversy over that issue the last time. Ms. Carson stated that when property is annexed it does not have permanant zoning and the city should initiate zoning. She added that the property owner in the case mentioned by Ms. Brock was in agreement. Mr. Fanning stated that as a general rule zoning does not have much vi.lue. Mr. Holt stated that a lot of contracts were contingent upon use and value. Mr. Escue suggested a sliding scale premium and that it would be a fairer method than the other methods. Mr. Fanning stated that staff needed direction. He said that the Commission needed to look at intensity and over- all planning. Ms. Brock stated that the property ad scent to PD-41 is over intensity based on zoning and as ed how can it be controlled. Mr, Fanning stated that if the capital improvement program funds are needed in the area to deny it. Ms. Carson stated that the Planning Commission doesn't see the oversizing agreements for utilities but thAt is another way to control development. Mr. Fanning stated that zoning is the first evil and then the cost to do other Improvements. Mr. Claiborne stated that the practice of the band nid approach in that If the development poses a question the Commission could request the proposal be tabled and con- vene to a closed session. He said that he believed it would get a message across to the developers. He said that he would like to have a conference with the City Council to put an immediate end to the first come, first serve unwritten practice. Mr. Holt stated that the Commission needed to get policy from the City Council. Mr. Fanning stated that the Guide provides for the study session review now. Ms. Brock stated that each individual case could be re- viewed and discussed and the Commission could reject the proposal. Mr. Fanning stated that staff is recommending all four steps as an interim solution. He said to modify first step to look at all planning issues because the Commission may need more time to look at a proposal. , P li 2 Minutes August o, 1986 Page 10 Ms. Carson stated that staff may need support from the Commission but staff could bring the concern to the Commission under new business on agenda to set a date for a study session. ids. Brock said that it could be brought to the Commis- sion's attention before being scheduled as a public hearing. Mr. Claiborne asked how far in advance does the staff know this information. Ms. Carson stated that typically early because of the Development Review Committee process. idr. Claiborne said to give a premium to the first person but no more than 101 of reserve, Mr. Escue stated that maybe with a sliding scale the Commission could review and give consideration to a 101i or some percentage increase. Mr. Holt moved to recommend that staff do the following: 1. Intensity question be brought to the attention of the Commission prior to notification proceedings and a study session requested; 1. Staff examine boundaries of intensity area; 3. Staff should review planning for the entire area; 4. If the area is over the standard, the staff should consider the least intense laud use for the area based on the land use and toning in the area. He said that these requests have been made because the Commission is trying to eliminate the practice of first come, first serve. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unani- mously carried (7-0). Mr. Kamman asked about the time frame on these proposals to be brougQht to the Commission, Ms. Carson stated that the staff is aware of the problem with the Item at the Development Review Committee meeting and informs the petitioner of the problem with intensity. Mr. Claiborne suggested that they delay the public hear- ing on cases until 7:00 and have work sessions at 5;00. Ms. Cole stated that she believed it would pose a problem, Ms. Carson said occasionally it would be okay because the number of requests has significantly reduced; however, it might cause some confusion if the meetings were delayed on a regular basis. Ms. Brock moved to recommend that the first come, first serve practice be terminated by the City Council and notify Council to discontinue the practice unless some legitimate planning reason exists. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (7-0), III. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING Mr, Claiborne vacated chair. Ms. Carson called for nominations for Chairman. Mr. Escue nominated Bill Claiborne for Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Seconded by Mr. Holt. 15a2L ' r ~d~~ 1 • T'"1 R B S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has made its recommendation for a five year Capital Improvement Plan to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a Citizens Committee • to review the proposed Capital Improvement Plan together with other proposed Capital Improvements and make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council relative thereto; and WHEREAS, a bond election and bond sale may be necessary to provide funding for the Capital Improvements Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON; SECTION I. That if a $O.S9 tax rate (per one hundred dollar valuation) Is approved by ordinance of the City Council, $O.S7 (per one )undred dollar valuation) of said $O.S9 would be necessary to provide funding for the City's current 1986-87 maintenance and operation budget and the existing debt service requirements of j fiscal year 1986.87, SECTION II. That the proceeds frou the additional $0,02 tax rate (per one hundred dollar valuation) will be placed in the City's General Debt Service Retirement fund in order to help defray the costs of any additional debt service requirements needed to fund a Capital Improvements Program. + SECTION III. That, in the event no program is recommended, or the voters fail to approve the construction of the proposed capital Improve- ments, the proceeds from the additional $0.02 (per one hundred dollar valuation) will remain in the General Debt Service Fund, and be available to pay future year debt service requirements on existing outstanding debt, and allow reductions in the debt service levy of future years. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY HATOR CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS AftEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRrMY CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: 1 DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i HY s 0357L (36L) NO, AN ORDINANCE LEVYING THE AD VALOREM TAX OF THE CITY Of DBNTON, TEXAS, FOR THE YEAR 1986, AT THE RATE OF $0.S9 PER $100.00 • ASSESSED EVALUATION ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY ON JANUARY 1, 1986, NOT EXEMPT BY LAW; PROVIDING REVENUES FOR PAYMENT OF CURRENT MUNICIPAL EXPENSES, AND FOR INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON OUTSTANDING CITY OF DENTON PROVIBONDS; PROVIDING ENFFOR ORCEMENTLIMITED OF EXEMPTIONS COLLECTIONS; CERTAIN PROVIDING FOR HOMESTEADS; SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EPrECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I, That by authority of tho Charter of the City of Denton, Texas, and the Laws of the State of Texas, there is hereby levied for the year 19860 on all taxable property situated within the corporate limits of the City of Denton on the first day of January, 1986, and not exempt Ly the Constitution and Laws of the State of Texas or by Section 2 of this Ordinance, a tax of $O.S9 on each $100.00 assessed value of all taxable property. SECTION II. That of the total tax, $0.4067 on each $100 of assessed value shall be distributed to the General Nund of the City to i fund maintenance and operation expenditures of the City, SECTION III. That of the total tax, $0,1833 on each $100 of assessed value shall be distributed to pay the City's debt service as provided by Section 26,04(e) (3) of the Texas Property Tax Code, SECTION IV. That pursuant to Article VIII, Section 1-b or, the Texas Constitution, $S,OO0.00 of the assessed value if resident homesteads, shall be exempt from City ad valorem taxes. i SECTION V. That pursuant to Article VIII, Section 1-b of the Texas j Constitution, $16,000.40 of the arsaesied value of resident PAGE ONE homesteads of persons sixty-five (65) years of age or older, shall be exampt from City ad valorem taxes. SECTION VI. That for enforcement of the collection of taxes hereby levied, the City of Denton shall have available all rights and remedies provided by law. SECTION VII. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity, SECTION VIII. That this ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of Septemhet, 1986. R , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LBGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS BY: QU12 Ad Af 49 PAGE TWO u., DATE: 9/09186 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 1'Q el fU: Mayor and Members of the City Council Age FROM: Lloyu Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan instituting annexation proceedings on approximately 132,64 acres of land being part of tree G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and part of the W. Durham Survey, Abstract No. 3UO, and beginning at a point approximately one mile south of F.M. 426 (East McKinney) ana one and one-half miles north of I.H.-35E (A-37) RECUMMENUATIUN: A Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation will bQ forwarded at a later date. SUMdARY: The property in this request is owned by the Corps of Engineers, and the annexation petition was precipitated by the need to have all land that will be affected by the proposed ma or thoroughfare for the proposed Lakeview Development annexed wit in the City of Denton. The Parks and Recreation Department requested annexation of additional property for their planning purposes. The City of Denton is the petitioner of this proposed annexation. BACKURUUNU: Not applicable NRUuP*jS, DEPARTMENTS UR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton, Corps of Engineers, Miller of Texas, Inc. FISCAL ImPALT: Undetermined ctfu ly submitted: + o e Pr ared by: City Manager David son Senior Planner .App ve e e Director of Planning and Development lb2ba O L NO. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LkID CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 13'!.64 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330; AND PART OF THE W. DURHAM SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1009 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS{ CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, a request for annexation for the property described in Exhibit "A", a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of The City of Denton, Texas; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the day of -)}u u s f- 1986 in the Council Chambers £ot aIT interested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the ~q'~ day of A4 /elV.s t , 1986 in the council Chambers for ali intereste persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That the tract of land described in said Exhibit "A" be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the some is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by the City. SECTION II. The property described in Exhibit "A" is hereby classified as Agricultural '•A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION 111. Should any section or part of this ordinance be held unconstiturional, illegal or invalid, or the application thereof ineffective or inapplicable as to any territory, such unconsti- tutionality, illegality, invalidity or ineffectiveness of such A•37/CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS/PAGE ONE section or part shall in no wise affect, impair or invalidate the remaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such remaining portion or portions, the some shall be and remain in full force and effect; and should this ordinance for any reason be ineffective as to any part of the area hereby annexed to the City of Denton, such ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any such part or parts of any such area shall not affect the effectiveness of this ordinance as to all of the remainder of such area, and the City Council hereby declares it to be Its purpose to annex to the CitjyY of Denton every part of the area described in said Exhibit "A" of this ordinance, regardless of whether any other part of such described area is hereby effectively annexed to the City. Provided, further, that if there is Included within the general description of territory set out in Section I of this Ordinance to be hereby annexed to the City of Denton any lands or area which are presently part of and included within the limits of the City of Denton, or which are presently part of and included within the limits of any other City, Town or Village, or which are not within the City of Denton's jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby excluded and excepted frum the territory to be hereby annexed as fully as if such excluded and excepted area were expressly described herein. SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon Its passage, Introduced before the City Council on the day of , 1986, PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of 1986. R , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN CIT? SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: A-37/CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS/PAGE TWO G . EXHIBIT ,V All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated In the 0, Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and part of the W. Durham Survey, Abstract 330, Denton County, Texas, and mote particularly described as follows] 6 89GINNINO at a point In the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 85-210, Tract It said point also lying in the Nest boundary line of the W. Durham Survey, same being the Cast boundary line (it the a. Walker Survey, said point also being a U.$, Army Corps of Engineers Monument f-250-Wr Ti(CNCI South $96 05' Cast along said present city limits passing at 1,116.57 feet the Southeast corner of said Tract i, contaiuing for a total distance of O,s, Army Corps of Ingineets Monument P-253-W1 TNCNCI Southeasterly Along the U,B, Army Corps of Engineers Boundary the following six (4) courses and distancesi (1) south 10 40' East, 823.0 feet to a 093. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-252-W1 (2) Westp 69000 feet to a U,3. Army Corps.ol Engineers Monument P-253-WI (3) South, 420 feet to a U.3. Army Corps of Inglneers Monument P-254-Nr (4) West, 196.0 feet to a U.B. Army Corps on Engineers Monument P-255-W; (5) South 356 351 Cast 622.4 feet to a point for corner, said point being a U.C. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-256•0r (6) south 586 21' East, 562.0 fast to a point for corner, said point being a U,S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-257-wi THENCI South 384 46' 596 West crossing the Corps Tract and the Pecan Creek fork of Lake Lewisville, a distance of 943.72 feet to a point for cornerp said point being a U.3. Army Corps of Engineera Monument P-234-Wr THENCI Northwesterly along the U.S, Army Corps of Engineocs boundary the following sixteen, (16) courses and dlstancesf (1) North $06 10' Weat, 477.5 feet to a U.S, Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-235-Wi (2) South 82' 21' West, 244.0 feet to a U,B. Army Carps of Engineers Monument P-234-W: (3) North 216 45' West, 1,162.6 feet to a U.S. Army Cops of Engineers Monument P-111-W, (4) North 676 430 Waste 310.06 feet to a U„¢, Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-238-Wr (5) South 026 1S' Weatp 236.4 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Ingineers Monument P-239-Wr (6) Sour 696 35' Weet, 556.0 feet to a U,S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-240-Wi (7) North 300 59' West, 10140,8 feet to a U.3, Army Corps of Ingineere Monument P-241-W) (0) South 56, 12' West,67249 feet to a U.B. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-242-W) (9) North 106 $6+ West, 547.2 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-243-Ws (101 Notth 176 12' Westp 341,7 feet to a U.E. Army Corps of ArmynCorpsMooof 11-244-Wo 41' Cast# 164*7 foot South so; 59, casto912~01 Sfoot to a U.C. Army Corps of Inginoora Monument P-246-Nr (13} North $61 59' Cast 660.0 feet to a U,s, Army Corps of Engineera Monument P-247-Wt (14) North 026 $4' East, 153.0 feet to a U.3. Army Corps of Inglneers Monument P-240-W1 (15) Cast, 10484.4 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Inginoors Monument P-24"I (16) North 000 24' West, 450 foot to the point of beginning and containing 132664 acres of land. A-37 PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: I. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services. using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B, Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation, C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09., of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, D, Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, E, Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation, Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area, I. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in 'che substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city. J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city, K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City conis!,sts of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas b„,red partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. r' It 1 1 1 f r ♦ W 1 ~~`1 JOW i • R c'y I • 11 r Rd. H ,CI I ~ • ~ I cam.. ,q_ woo „ r 37 ~p I I \`a j SHADY ! ' . '`ti • _ 7 I d j r r II .Z, LAlCIVIEW ) 11V~TMlN ~f XI-N r AASA AP /ICAO t LNWINVILLN LAKE rr rMIi'1M f FW1 A-37 ANNEXATION SCHEDULE July 7, 19e6 Submit City council agenda item July 9, 1986 Submit agenda back-up * ~.~Juiy 15, 1986 City Council sets date, time and place tot public hearing ! July 22, 1986 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle L."July 25, 1986 Publish noti^e and mailout July 28, 1986 Submit City Council agenda item ✓JuIy 30, 1986 Submit agenda back-up for City Council " ✓ August 5, 1986 City Council holds first at regular meeting public hearing ✓Auqust 6, 1986 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle August S, 1986 Publish notice and mailout 'August 11, 1986 Submit City Council agenda August 13, 1986 Planning and Zoning commission makes recommendation ✓ August 13, 1986 Submit agenda back-up ✓ August 19, 1986 City Council holds second public at regular meeting✓ August 25, 1986 Submit City Cot(ncil agenda. item ✓`Auqust 27, 1986 Submit agenda back-up IN September 9, 1986 City Council institutes annexation pcocesdings at special called meeting September 11, 1986 ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle September 14, 1986 Publish ordinance October 13, 1986 Submit City Council agenda item October l4, 1986 Submit City Council agenda back-up * October 21, 1986 Final action by City Council at regular meeting * Denotes action by the City council 0964q d (dyT+~€? tom! 7 CIT~► Of DLMTON, TZX48 MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MOKINNEY ST. l 9ENTON, TEXAS 75201 M E M O R A N D U M T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager DATE: September 3, 1986 SUBJECT: RECENT COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATION PROPOSAL I Recently members of the Health Department task force along with other interested municipalities, met with county health officials to discuss the most recent County Health Department reorganization proposal approved by the County Commissioners Court August 25 (refer to attachment). Details of that meeting are summarized below. f 1. A new per capita fee of $.82 has been established that would significantly reduce each participating municipalities' assessment for the fiscal year 1986--87. Utilizing the new per capita fee, the City of Denton would be responsible for total payment of $51,742 for environmental and clinical services compared to $152,071 when using the $2.41 per capita fee proposed by the county in May. The new per capita fee is the direct result of a significant increase in fees. 2. An interlocal contract will be negotiated for each participating municipality and is to be submitted to the County Commissioners Court by September 15. The County strongly contends that it will not provide environmental services to any municipality that does not contract for this service (refer to attachment for sample contract). 3. The new proposal io based upon several assumptions: at All cities in Denton County will contract for health services) b. Fee revenue will meet the county's projectional c. Denton County does not have roll back. It is important that we keep in mind that tho proposal will be reevaluated, including increasing the per capita rate, if any of these assumptions prove to be inaccurate. a171656&''d0 DIFW METRO 434-2520 r Harrell, page 2 The proposal appeared to be well raceived by participating municipalities attending our meeting, however, we still do not know the final level of financial commitment required of all those involved in this issue. At this point our counterproposal that offered $125,000 to the County for environmental and clincial services is invalid. We will be responsible for paying only the $51,742 for environmental and nlinical services for fiscal year 1986-87. This amount is substantially lower than the amount of $1520071 proposed in May. However, according to Ruth Tansey, we may be asked by the county to pay an additional amount if all the participating municipalities do not accept the new proposal. It is unknown at the present time what that amount would be. Since the County has established September 15 as the deadline, it Is my recommendation that we submit our contract to the County for $51,742 for fiscal year 1986-87. In the meantime, we will continue our in-house study of feasibility for a City health operation. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. e cKea Ass, ant City Mana er attachment: Memorandum to Betty McKean Letter to Mayor Sample of Health Services Contract CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-SM MEMORANDUM DATE: August 26, 1986 TO: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager FROM: Richard Poster, Energy Information Specialist SUBJECT: COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATION On Monday, August 25, 1986, the Denton County Commissioner& Court discussed the reorganization of the County Health Department. Commissioner Ruth Tansey has scheduled regional meetings for the evening of Tuesday, September 2, 1986, (Lewisville 6:00 p.m., Denton 7:30 p.m.) to meet with representatives of County municipalities and present the County's propc:ial for funding the County Health Department through FY 1.986--1987. Commissioner Tansey stated that she needed some direction from the Court so that she would be able to present a proposal to the municipal representatives at the above mentioned meetings. Commissioner Tansey presented the Court with three options. Options 42 and N3 both involved various cutbacks of services, facilities and/or personnel. After lengthy discussion, the Court approved Option ((1 as the proposal Commissioner Tansey should take to the meetings. Option M1 consists of main- taining ell current levels of cervices, facilities and staff. Inspection and application fees would be increased, and county residents (or the munici- palities in which they live) would be assessed a per capita fee of $.82 to make up the difference between expenditures and revenue. The numbers look like this: Anticipated expenditures: Approximately $627,234 Anticipated fee revenue: Approximately $370,699 Anticipated state revenue: Approximately $ 78,000 Difference between expenditures and revenue: $627,234 - 448,699 $178,535 -1- Betty McKean August 26, 1986 Page Two The projected (COG) population for Denton county (excluding Carrollton, which contracts with Dallas County for these services) is 217,356. By dividing the projected deficit by the projected County population, one arrives at a figure of $.82 per county resident to balance the Health Department budget. These figures, however, are not only projections, but are also dependent upon all municipalities in the County (except Carrollton) agreeing to participate. The Court also approved a motion directing the County's legal representative to begin drawing up contracts for use between the County and the various munici- palities regarding these services, fees and assessments. My overall impression of the meeting was that Commissioner Tansey, Pat Griffith, her Administrative Assistant, and various personnel of the County Health Department had worked hard to make this presentation to the court. They seemed well prepared, and the Health Department was well represented. After the Court had recessed for lunch, I had a brief conversation with Commissioner Tansey, Pat Griffith and attorney Jim Allison. They indicated that they were still interested in acquiring the $125,000 the City of Denton had offered the County in our counter-proposal to the $152,000 assessment the County had originally requested. If, however, we apply the County's newest per capita assessment of $482 to Denton's projected population of 63,100, we arrive at a figure of $51,742. This is $73,256 less than the ;125,000 we offered in July. Also, the issue of double taxation for City residents was neither mentioned not discussed. A letter detailing the Court's action and the revised proposal should he sent to Mayor Stephens on August 26. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me. Richard Foster Energy Information Specialist od 02490 I -2- RUTH TANSKY LEE WALKER PRECINCT 1 PRECINCT 3 (817) 382.4608 (811) 484.1410 BANDY JACOSS SIGN COURT S. E. SWITZER PRECIN072 PRECINCT4 (214) 438.3721 (811) 482.3413 BUDDY COLE, JUDGE 401 W. HICKORY (817) 666.8686 DENTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT BUILDING 712 W, SYCAMORE, DENTON, TEXAS 78201 (817)383.8349 o(1817') 383.04H August 27, 1986 Dear Mayor, As you are aware, Denton County is in the process of reorganizing the Denton City/County Health Department by establishing the Denton County Health Department. This move was taken to comply with Article 4436b (V.T.C.S.) which was adopted in 1983 and gave counties one year to come into compliance. We regret that this has been a confusing issue to some of you. However, this process was more complex than any of us imagined. Enclosed please find an updated and revised proposal for public health services as agreed upon by Commissioners Court on August 25, 1986. This is only a proposal and is subject to change if assumed circumstances change. We will conduct three regional meetings with the municipalities to answer any questions you might have. The meetings will be as follows: Lewisville Government Center - Sept. 2, 6:00 P.M. Commissioners Court Building - Sept. 2, 7:30 P.M. Sanger City Hall - Sept. 3, 7:00 P.M. The enclosed sample contract was approved in open court on August 25. We will only be able to provide environmental services to those cities who choose to contract with us. If there are questions concerning this revised proposal, please call Commissioner Tansey (817-383-8399) or her assistant, Pat Griffith (817-382-4508 or 383-8399). Si erely you/r~s, 1 Buddy Cole County Jud e BC/pg Encl. -3- PROPOSAL DENTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT in open session on August 25, 1986, Denton County Commissioners Court chose the following proposal in connection with the reorganization of the health department: 1. The enclosed fee schedule was adopted to be effective October 1, 1986. These fees will be charged to the user except clinical services when the user is unable to pay. 2. The enclosed proposed city assessment is based on a per capita rate of $.82 for both clinical and environmental health services. (The combined per capita rate on our previous proposal was $2.41.) 3. An interlocal contract will be negotiated for each city choosing to use the services of the Denton County Health Department. We will not provide environmental services to any city that does not contract with us. A sample contract is enclosed. 4. The services to be provided are indicated in the contract. We will continue to maintain six clinic locations. 5. This proposal is based upon the following assumptions: a) All cities in Denton County contract for health services; b) Fee revenue meets our projections; c) Denton County does not have roll back. If the assumptions prove to be inaccurate, the proposal will be reevaluated. -4- PROPOSAL DBNTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT BASED ON $.82 PER CAPITA* C1~ ~Y POPULATION AS8E8Sl4ENT Argyle 10400 $ 1,148 Aubrey 1,300 1,066 Bartonville 805 660 Copper Canyon 888 728 Corinth 21800 2,296 Corral City 112 92 Cross Roads 380 312 Denton 63,100 51,742 Double Oak 11950 10599 Eastvale 545 447 Flower Mound 11,800 91676 Hebron 111 91 Hickory Creek 2,050 11681 Highland Village 50050 4,141 Justin 1,100 902 Krugerville 701 575 Krum 1,250 11025 Lake Dallas 31600 2,952 Lakewood Village 197 162 LewiHViIle 37,200 30,504 Lincoln Park 38 31 Lfetle Elm 1,150 943 Marshall Creek 507 416 Nor.thlake 169 139 Oak Point 853 699 Pilot Point 2,550 21091 Ponder 325 267 Roanoke 11300 1,066 Sanger 31850 3,157 Shady Shores 10050 861 The Colony 17,150 14,063 Trophy Club 21750 20255 w $627,234 FY86/87 Budget -3700695 Projected Fee Revenue (See Attached Fee Schedule) 78 000 Revenue From State Contract site 35 .217 356 County Population Excluding Carrollton Per Capita _g_ FEE SCHEDULE DEN'TON COUNTY HEALTH DBPAR"IENT REVISED EFFECTIVE 10-1-06 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOOD SERVICE RESTAURANTS $ 50 SASE + $10 PER TABLE {NO MAXIMUM) GROCERY STORES $50 BASE + $35 PER CASH REG. (NO MAXIMUM) APPLICATIONS $100 + $1 PER 100 SQUARE FEET SEPTIC SYSTEMS INSPECTIONS $100 REINSPECTIONS $ 50 LOAN INSPECTIONS $100 LOAN LETTERS $ 20 HEALTH CARDS $ 15 POOLS $150 WATER WELLS $ 50 DAYCARES $ 25 + $1 PER CHILD (BASED ON LICENSE CAPACITY) CLINICAL HEALTH IMMUNIZATIONS $ 5 PER CHILD HIS $ 7 GAMMA GLOBULIN $ 8 OVERSEAS YELLOW FEVER $ 20 CHOLERA $ 10 TYPHOID $ 10 VD $ 10 TB $ 4 DIABETES SCREENING $ 5 LICE CHECK $ 5 PER FAMILY BLOOD PRESSURE $ 1 ALLERGY $ 5 -6- STAT8 OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR HEALTH SERVICES Whereas, the Denton County Commissioners Court, pursuant to Article 4436b, "Local Public Health Reorganization Act," V.T.C.S., has organized the Denton County Health Department, hereinafter call *Department"; and Whereas, the Denton County Commissioners Court has designated Dr. W. H. Cripe, a licensed physician, as director of the Department and Health Authority for the County; and Whereas, Denton County and the City of , Texas, mutually desire to cooperate in providing public health services to the citizens of the City of and Denton County, Texas; and Whereas, Interlocal Cooperation Agreements between counties and incorporated municipalities to provide public health services are authorized by Article 4413(32c) and Article 4436b, V.T.C.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, Denton County, Texas ("County") and the City of , Texas, A Municipality located within Denton County, Texas ("Municipality"), hereby enter into this Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for Health Services and mutually agree upon the following terms and conditions: I. The effective date of this agreement is October 10 1986, and this agreement shall automatically terminate on September 30, 1987 unless extended or renewed by written agreement of the parties. r. .7- . II. For the purposes and consideration stated herein, Denton County, through the Department, shall provide the following public health services for the citizens of the Municipality to the maximum extent authorized by this agreement, without regard to race, religion, color, age, or national origin; to wits (1) Environmental Health Services including restaurant and grocery store inspections, septic system inspections, food handler health card inspections, swimming pool inspections, water well inspections, day care facility inspections, school inspections, foster home inspections, rabies inspections, citizen complaint review, and all necessary administrative services; (2) Clinical Health Services including immunizations and injections including HIB, Gamma Globulin, Yellow Fever, Cholera, Typhoid, well-child clinic, prenatal clinic, venereal disease clinic, TB, diabetes, lice, blood pressure, and allergy screening, and all necessary administrative services. III. The Municipality hereby designates Dr. W. H. Cripe, or his successor a's Director of, the Department, as Health Authority within its jurisdiction and authorizes Dr. Cripe and the Department to administer and enfc:ce all state statutes and local ordinances pertaining to public health within its jurisdiction. The Authority and the Department shall not exceed its authorized budget to enforce local ordinances. IV. The Municipality agrees to pay the County for the full performance of this agreement the total sum of „r tit l . . i Dollars 1 payable as follows: on or before October If 19861 $ on or before January 1, 1987; on or before April 1, 1987; and $ on or before July 1, 1987. V, The County agrees to utilize all sums received from the Municipality and all sums received as fees for services solely to provide the above-described public health services through the Department. The County agrees to assess fees for services according to a uniform schedule throughout the County and shall not deny services because of inability to pay. VI. The undersigned officers hereby certify that they have been properly authorized to execute this agreement on behalf of the parties hereto and that all necessary resolutions or orders have been duly adopted. Executed in multiple originals on the day of 1986. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS CITY OF , TEXAS By: By: Honorable Buddy Cole County Judge Denton County, Texas Approved: Dr. W. H. Cr pe i -9- GOAL - TRANSFER OF FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ACTION STEPS WHO WHAT WHEN 1. City Council Appointment of Board of Advisors ASAP County Commissioners 2. Flow Obtain purchaser and determine terms of Prior to Filing payment for bonds to be issued for Declaratory Judgment validation suit. Action 3. Gardere 4 Wynne Preparation of brief., convening a meeting Brief Prepared of Denton County Health Facilities Corpora- Other Items Still tion to authorize issuance of debt, a Not Completed prerequisite to filing lawsuit. (a) Flow Obtain a written evaluation of the Prior to Filing hospital from Eppler, Guerin & Turner Declaratory Judgment Action 4. Flow Advise the Department of Health and Human Prior to Closing Services regarding the proposed transfer so that the Hill-Burton obligations can be reviewed, (a) Flow, Gardere 8 Wynne Prepare a resolution for the Flow board Prior to Closing to adopt assuming the Hill-Burton obli- gations of the hospital pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Transfer Agreement. S. Flow, Gardere & Wynne Addition of certain conflict of interest Prior to Closing provisions to Flow's bylaws pursuant to Section 4.6 of the Agreement. GOAL - TRANSFER OF FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ACTION STEPS WHO WHAT WHEN 6. City Council, Advise Flow of elig'.bility standards to be Immediately Prior County Commissioners used if Hill-Burton is not desired. to Closing 7. Gardere & Wynne Preparation of instrument of assumption Prior to Closing pursuant to Sections 1.2 and 1.7(b) of the Asset Transfer Agreement, 8. Flow, Gardere $ Wynne Receipt of Flow's section 501(c)(3) status Prior to Closing determination. 9. Floa7 Receive release of City and County from Prior to Closing bondholders or pay and redeem bonds. 10. Flow, Gardere 6 Wynne identify and obtain necessary permits Prior to Closing and licenses required by government authorities to own and operate the hospital. 11. City Council, Written schedule of medical malpractice One week prior County Commissioners claims pending. to closing. 12. City Council, Closing 45 days from date County Commissioners of filing lawsuit. All Lawyers ED CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 6664307 OIHos of thr City ManapK M B M U R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager DATE: September 4, 1986 SUBJECT: Update on City Council Goals - ]Economic Development and Long Range Facility Space Issues The task forces involved with both economic development and long range facility space issues have begun their meetings and are ready to provide updates concerning the progress in each area. Atta:;hed are the outlines of issues which will be discussed at Tuesday's work session. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. e TT-r- MCROAM Assistant City Manager sj 3U65M September, 5, 1986 Goal: 4 SPACE Committee Members: Bruce Henington Bill Angelo Steve Brinkman Ernie Tullos Betty McKean Hugh Lynch Richard Foste. SUB-ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN A. Determine utilization - Short Term: Space Recommendation Space Committee Completed and project need. - Long Term: Space Study Space Consultant October 198, B. Lease or Own - Recommend getting rid of current Space Committee Completed lease arrangements and constructing City facilities for all office: needs in the future. C. Develop a Plan (Short Term) 1. Law Enforcement/ - Present concept to CIP Committee Steve Brinkman September Court Complex Hugh Lynch 1986 or City Hall Expansion - Review and approval by Council CIP Committee October 198E Develop plans for marketing to Steve Brinkman October/ public. November 1986 - Develop RFP. Steve Brinkman As dictated Hugh Lynch by Capital Imp ovements Hire architect. Steve Brinkman Program - Accept final plans. Council - Begin construction. Steve Brinkman Hugh Lynch Supervise construction. Steve Brinkman Hugh Lynch SUB-ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN 2. Old City Hall - Development plans on who moves Steve Brinkman As dictated (If Law Enforcement/ into the vacated space. by Capital Court Complex is Improvements Program selected) - Prepare to move existing police offices. Undertake transition. Renovate old jail area for Data Processing. - Move appropriate departments/ divisions into Old City Hall. - Review and approve recommendations. CMO/Council February 1987 - To involve all City facilities. D. Develop a Plan (Long Term) . This plan will discuss proper Steve Brinkman October 1987 office surplus, timing expansion projects, centralization vs decentralization, district operations, proper design of facilities, land acquisition, parking and traffic requirements, City Hall expansion and marketing. E. Education of Public as to - Short Mange 1986 CIP CIP Committee/ October/ Costs Council/Staff November 1986 - Long Range Space Consultant October 1967 Goal: 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Committee Members: Betty McKean, Chairperson Bob Nelson John McGrane Bryan Stuart Jeff Meyer Rick Svehla Jack Miller (Ex Officio) Economic Development Director SUB-ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN A, What is Denton's -Develop a list of policies that could John McGrane October - 1986 economic develop- hamper economic development and suggest ment plan? revisions -Review Cott Committee data Betty McKean Ongoing pertinent to Cities Task Force uses -Participate in 1CMA Consortium Betty McKean Ongoing with Universities -Designate an Ombudsman to be Jeff Meyer Ongoing assigned to each industrial prospect to ensure facilitation of procedures -Make report of City's pan to the Lloyd Harrell November - 1986 Chamber Economic Development Team -Establish a Department of Economic City Council September 9, 1986 Development, headed by a Director of Economic Development: -Obtain 1/3 financing from PUB Bob Nelson Completed -Prepare draft of contract CMO Completed -Staff review and review of CMO/LEGAL August S, 1986 contract by City Attorney -Present to City Manager Betty McKean August 26, 1986 -Present contract to City Council Lloyd Harrell October 21 1986 Page 2 of 5 Goal: 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUB-18SUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN -Appoint one Utility Board and Economic Development one City Council member to Team represent City on Economic Development 'ream -Obtain funding Chamber January 1, 1987 -Fill Director of Economic City/Chamber January 1, 1987 Development Position -Final report of City Task Force Betty McKean/Mejabers April 1, 1987 to City Council. Report on of Task Force specific tasks will be part of overall report to Council B, What type of -Determine the feasibility cf attract- Betty McKean September 1, 1986 industry/ in the "entertainment" industry to resources? Denton -Analyze the strengths and resources Bob Nelson October 15, 1986 attractive to industries. -Profile of the types of industry we Bryan Stuart October 1S, 1986 currently have in Denton -Profile the degrees of the graduates Bryan Stuart October 1S, 1986 that come from NTSU 4 TWU and try to use this profile to attract industry -Determine what type of services and Bryan Stuart October 15, 1986 research the Universities can provide -Analyze the local labor force Betty McKean/ October 15, 1986 Bryan Stuart -Determine the feasibility of attract- Betty McKean September 1, 1986 ing the "entertainment" industry to Denton -Identify industries that may not Betty McKean/Jeff Meyer November 1, 1986 be compatible with Denton's goals Page 3 of-5 Goal; 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUB-ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN -Identify University land that is Jeff Meyer November - 1986 available for development -Identify "campus" type or "Las Colinas" Jeff Meyer November 1986 type land areas in Denton C. Extend -Review current policies regarding the Bob Nelson January 15, 1987 Infrastructure City's stance on extension and con- streecs 4 struction of infrastructure for pro- utilities. motion of economic development and prepare a position paper for the City Council with recommendations for im- provement (See Cott Committee Research Data) -Dovelop ideas for structuring the John McGrane/Finance March 1, 1987 financing Committee D. What Is City role? -Establish an Economic Development Chamber/Council January 1, 1987 What is Chamber office of C-)mmerce role? -Establish priorities for targeted Eco. Director/Chamber January 1, 1987 Industrial recruitment Eco. Dev. Team -Analyze what other cities are Eco. Director March 1, 1987 doing to attract and retain industry -Identify potential areas for develop- Eco. Director March 1, 1987 ment -Identify target Industries Eco. Director March 1, 1987 -Explore the possibility of hiring a Chamber/City June 1, 1987 development consultant for specialized st49ies -Establish pro-active programs in order Eco. Director Ongoing to solicit new industries Page 4 of 5 Goal: 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUB-ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN -Contact local industry and try to Eco. Director Ongoing attract suppliers to our area -Support the Chamber, County $ Council $ Staff Ongoing Regional econ. development efforts. -Maintain & continuing reporting, Executive Group Ongoing monitoring, $ and updating process of Denton's economic development plan. -Develop economic develop five-year Eco. Bev. Team June 10 1987 master plan E. Maintaining -Train DRC participants in promoting Jeff Meyer January 1, 1987 existing pro-active relations with i.ew industry industry. -Host first semi-annual breakfast for Mayor/Manager To be announced local CEO-s to meet with City officials to improve communication and generate more ideas -Cultivate industrial relationships Mayor/Council/Managers Ongoing -Review internal procedures for Jeff Meyer Ongoing Development Review. -Tmpr.ve communication with boards by Lloyd HarrelliC°ty Ongoing holding periodic joint meetings Council -Pursue the feasibility of hosting an Betty McKean annual banquet to present financial/ economic forecasts -Study the feasibility of participation Jeff Meyer December 25, 1986 in the National Committee for Development Trade Institute Page 5 of 5 Goal: 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUS-ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN F. What role will Take steps to implement the Master Plan Rick Svehla October 1, 1987 the airport play in Denton's economic development? G. What are our -Conduct a study to determine the Bob Nelson January 1, 1987 financial feasibility of a public/private alternatives`! alliance to create industrial parks. Prepare a position paper to be presented to the City Council. -Explore joint ventures with the John McGrane March 1, 1987 Universities. UDAGs. -Consider continuation of 1/3 funding City Council September 1, 1986 for economic development fiffice based on results -identify available money and determine John McGrane January 15, 1987 restrictions -Pooling of financial resources -Tax increment financing -Municipal Utility District bcs 09/04/86 3017M i M AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL September 9, 1986 Joint Work Session of the City of Dentcn City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission on Tueadal, September 9, 1986 at 5:4-,U p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the iiunicipal 8uild'ng at which the following items will be considereds 513U P.M. 1. tiold a discussion of intensity policies in eastern Denton between U.S. Highway 38J and 1--35. 2. Hold a discussion of the fir,tit come - first serve intensity allocation procedure. special Called Aieeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, September 9, 198b, at 7100 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7100 P.M. 1. Keaolgltio'ns: A. Consider adoption of a re30lUtion allocating $.02 of the tax rate to the General Oebt Service Fund only. Urdinancea: A. Consider adoption of at, ordinance setting the tax rate for fiscal year 1986-87. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan instituting annexation of approximately 132.64 acres of land being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and part Of Lhe W. Durham Survey, Abstract No. 30U, and beginning at a point approximately one mile south of FM 426 (East McKinney) and one and one-half miles north of 1-35E. (A-37) 2. Consider authorizing the Aayor to establish a Denton Bicentennial of the United States Constitution Committee. 3. Keceive a report and hold a discussion on the reorganization proposal for the County Health Department. Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, September 9, 1986, in the Civil Defen©e Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: x - City of Denton City Council Agenda September 9, 1986 Page Two 1. Receive a report on the 1985 City Council goals and priorities$ #6 Flow hospital 2nd tialf #2 Economic Development #4 Spare 21 Executive Sesei,onj A. Legal clatters Under Sec. 2 (eArt. x252-17 V.A.T.S. - Discussion of legal ib ue.a concerning indigent care order Art. 4436f. be Real Estate Under Sec. 2(fArt, u2:1••l~ .A.I.S. C. Personnel/Hoard Appointments Under Snc. 2(g Art 62521-.17 V.A*T.S. 3. Official Action on Executive S^esion ILems; A. Legal MaLrers Be Real Estate C. eareonnel/Hoard Appointments C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting wan posted on tLe bulletin board at the Cit; hall of the CLty of Denton, Texas, on the day of 19016 at o clank (a. m. ) C(p. m. ) k?A "741A, -nI SECRETARY 2371C