Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-21-1986 AGLNdA Q~ o~ o bit a 19 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 21, 1986 . Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, Uctober 21, 1986, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m. 1. Hold a discussion on proposed preliminary plat of the Fig Art Addition, a development planned on 7 acres beginning adjacent and south of FM 2181, across frora Hickory Creek Mobile Home Park, approximately 1.1 miles south of Hickory Creek Road within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Denton for the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation process. 1. Hold a discussion regarding future membership in the North Texas Commission. 3. Consider giving staft direction regarding engineering work on the Uak-Hickory street improvement project. 4. Receive a report on the Utility Department Management Study by Dr. Littlefield. S. Executive Session; A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, Uctober 21, 1986, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building' at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 11 Consider approval of a request by the Jane Marshall School to place a banner across a public street to advertise a Children's Fine Arts Series. 2. Receive a report from the CIP Committee and topsider approval of a date to hold a public hearing regarding the proposed CIF program. 31 Appearance by Mr. Carl Williams to discuss Police Officers working as security guards while still in City of Denton uniform. City of Denton City Council Agenda October 21, 1986 Page Two 4. Public Hearings: A. Z-1834. Petition of Paul Hastings, representing Golden Triangle Joint Venture, requesting approval of a detailed plan including the preliminary plat of Golden Triangle/Michael's Addition, on a 3.2373 acre tract which is included in a planned development (PD-6). The property is located on Colorado Boulevard northwest of Loop 288 and shown in the J. S. Taft Survey No. 1256. If approved, the property may be utilized for 37,850 square feet of retail and restaurant space. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a detailed plan on a 3.2373 acre tract which is included in a planned development (PD-6). B. Z-1835. Petition of Burke Engineering, representing Bill Roberds, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) to the planned development district and approval of a concept plan on a 58.662 acre tract located west of North Locust (Fbt 2164) and northwest of Hercules Lane. The property is more fully described in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract 1288, if approved, the planned developmont would permit the following land uses: General Retail - 2.84 acres Multi-Family - 11.10 acres, 190 total units, with a density of 17.1 units per acre Garden/'Townhouse - 7.27 acres, 74 total units, with a density of 10.2 units per acre Single Family-7 - 18.64 acres, 76 total units, with a density of 4.1 units per acre Greenbelt - 18.81 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change to zoning and concept plan on a 58.662 acre tract located west of North Locust (FM 2164) and northwest of Hercules Lane. 5. Consent Agenda: • Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. City of Denton City Council Agenda October 21, 1986 Page Three Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 6.A, 6.80 b.C), This listing is provided on the consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid 0 9652 - Precast wall construction 2. Bid # 9656 - North Locust Street paving id drainage 3. Bid 0 9659 - Concrete poles 4. Purchase Order 0 75417 to R $ P Properties, Inc. in the amount of $27,560.50 5. Purchase Order 0 75735 to General Electric Company in the amount of $19,230.00 6. Purchase Order M 75742 to Thermo Tech Inc, in the amount of $16,662.00 . 7. Purchase Order Y 75803 to Xerox Corporation in the amount of $20,043.OU B. Change Orders: 1. Change Order N 1 to Bid # 9643 - CIP utilities Loop 288 30" waterline - to reduce the contract by $41,250.00 6. Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. D. Consider adoption of ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 132.64 acres of land being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 13300 City of Denton City Council Agenda October 21, 1986 Page Four and part of the W. Durham Survey, Abstract No. 300, and beginning at a point approximately one mile south of FM 426 (East McKinney) and one and one-half miles north of I-35h. (A-37) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing a fee for defensive driving courses taught by and administered by the City of Denton, Texas. F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and the Denton Chamber of Commerce providing for a program to promote economic development. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing fees and charges for the Emily Fowler Public Library. (The Library Board recommends approval.) 7. Resolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution designating the official newspaper of the City of Denton. 81 Consider authorization to solicit bids for the sale or trade of a 0.462 acre tract of public land situated north of and abutting Windsor Drive and west of Sherman Drive and more fully described as Lots 10 and 11, Meadowbrook Subdivision. (D-39) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 9. Consider authorizing the Mayor to establish a task force on drug abuse information and prevention in cooperation with programs offered by the U. S. Conference of Mayors and th3 White House. 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 11. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel and/or Board Appointments 13. Discussion of Ali-Alkafaji versus the City of Denton and Maverick Aircraft versus the City of Denton. 14, hxecutive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.C.S. (see item N13) City of Kenton City Council Agenda October 21, 1986 Page Five B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.C.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.C.S. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of ~1986 at '.:3(ef) o'clock (a. m. (p.m.) L_ JM~ CI'T'Y SECRETARY • 24060 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 21, 1986 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 21, 1986, at 5:30 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m. 1. Hold a discussion on proposed preliminary plat of the Fig Art Addition, a development planned on 7 acres beginning adjacent and south of FM 2181, across from Hickory Creek Mobile Home Park, approximately 1.1 miles south of Hickory Creek Road within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Denton for the purpose of determining whether to begin the annexation process. 2. Hold a discussion regarding future membership in the North Texas Commission. 3. Consider giving staff direction regarding engineering work on the Oak-Hickory street improvement project, 4. Receive a report on the Utility Department. Management Study by Dr. Littlefield. 5. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 62S2-17 V.A.T.5, B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f)9 Art. 6252-17 V. A. T. S, C. Personnel/hoard Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art 62SZ-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 21, 1986, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal building at which the following items will be considered: 7:UU p.m. 10 Consider approval of a request by the Jane Marshall School to place a banner across a public street to advertise a Children's Fine Arts Serics. 2. Receive a report from the CIP Committee and consider approval of a date to hold a public hearing regarding the proposed CIP program. 3. Appearance by Mr. Carl Williams to discuss Police Officers working as security guards while still in City of Denton uniform. City of Denton City Council Agenda October 21, 1986 Page Two ' 4. Public Hearings: A. Z-1834. Petition of Paul Hastings, representing olden Triangle Joint Venture, requesting approval of a detailed plan including the preliminary plat of Golden Yriangle/Michael's Addition, on a 3.2373 acre tract which is included in a planned development (PD-6). The property is located on Colorado Boulevard northwest of Loop 288 and shown in the J. S. Taft Survey No. 1256. If approved, the property may be utilized for 37,850 square feet of retail and restaurant space, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption at an ordinance approvin a detailed plan on a 3.2373 acre tract whic9 Is included in a planned development (YD-6). B. Z-1835. Petition of Burke Engineering, representing Bill Roberds, requesting a change in zoning frum the agricultural (A) to the planned development district and approval of a concept plan on a 58.662 acre tract located we9t of North Locust (FM. 2164) and northwest of Hercules Lane. The property is more fully described in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract 1288. if approved, the planned development would permit the following land uses: General Retail - 2.84 acres Multi-Family - 11.10 acres, 190 total units, with a density of 17.1 units per acre Garden/Townhouse - 7.27 acres, 74 total units, with a density of 10.2 units per acre Single Family-7 - 18.64 acres, 76 total units, with a density of 4.1 units per acre Greenbelt - 18.81 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning and concept plan on a 58.662 acre tract located west of North Locust. (FM 2164) and northwest of Hercules Lane, 5. Consent Agenda: Bach of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendati,nns. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee vo implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. City of Denton City Council Agenda October 21, 1986 Page Three Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 6.A, 6.B, 6.C), 'Chas listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid 0 9652 - Precast wall construction 2. Bid # 9656 - North Locust Street paving and drainage 3. Bid 0 9659 - Concrete poles 4. Purchase Order N 75417 to R $ P Properties, Inc. in the amount of $27,560.50 5. Purchase Order 0 75735 to General Electric Company in the amount of $19,230.00 6. Purchase Order 0 75742 to Thermo Tech Inc. In the amount of $16,662.00 7, Purchase Order t 75803 to Xerox Corporation in the amount of $20,043,00 B. Change Orders: 1. Change Order N I to Bid N 9643 - CIP utilities Loop 288 30" waterline - to reduce the contract by $41,250.U0 6, Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. C, Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. D, Consider adoption of ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 132,64 acres of land being part of the G, Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, City of Denton City Council Agenda October 21, 1986 Page Four and part of the W. Durham Survey, Abstract No. 300, and beginning at a point approximately one mile south of FM 426 (bast McKinney) and one and one-half miles north of I-35b. (A-37) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing a fee for defensive driving courses taught by and administered by the City of Denton, Texas. F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Dentin and the Denton Chamber of Commerce providing for a program to promote economic development. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing fees and charges for the Emily Fowler Public Library. (The Library Hoard recommends approval.) 7. Resolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution designating the official newspaper of the City of Denton. 8. Consider authorization to solicit bids for the sale or trade of a 0.462 acre tract of public land situated north of and abutting Windsor Drive and west of Sherman Drive and more fully described as Lots 10 and 11, Meadowbrook Subdivision. (D-39) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 9. Consider authorizing the Mayor to establish a task force on drug abuse information and prevention in cooperation with programs offered by the U. S. Conference of Mayors and the White House. 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 11. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Ufficial Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B, Real Estate C. Personnel and/or Board Appointments 13. Discussion of Ali-Alkafaji versus the City of Denton and Maverick Aircraft versus the City of Denton. 14, Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under :ec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.C,S. (see item #13) City of Denton City Council Agenda October 21, 1986 Page Five B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.C,S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.C.S. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1986 at o'clock (a.m.) (p.m.) CITY SECRETARY 2406C DATI: 10/21/86 CIZZ COMICIL RSPORT tORMAT vg~c' 30 P TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE PROPOSRD 00 SEVEN (7) ACRES LOCATED ADJACENT AND SOUTH OF F.M. 2181, ACROSS FROM HICKORY CREEK MOBILE HOME PARK, APPROXINATELY 1.1 MILES SOUTH OF HICKORY CREEK ROAD WITHIN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION (ETJ) OF TRI CITY OF DENTON FOR THE PURPOSE OP DETERMINING WHETHIR TO BEGIN THE ANNEXATrON PROCESS BROMMENDATION: The only advantage to annexing this property at this time would be to prevent the proposed land use. If the property is annexed the development process would be delayed, If the City Council feels that the potential economic benefits of the proposal are more important than the potential affect on lanC. use patterns along F.M. 2181 it is staff's suggestion that we expand the annexation study to provide a more detailed analysis of the impact of extending a minimum 500 foot strip along 2181. We could include additional isnannexed property. This would also give the owners time to plat and develop. If the City Council is concerned about prevailing negative land use patterns occurring along the F.M. 2181 corridor, annexation and zoning should be given strong consideration at this time because the development of this property may perpetuate the problem. Metroplex Engineezing Inc. presented a conceptual plat to the Development Review Committee to behalf of Fig-Art Corporation . for a proposed light industrial use at the above referenced location. An attached letter from George Arthur, the president of the corporation outlines the nature of the proposed business and specific plans for the project. Land use patterns along P.M. 2181 south of Hickory Creek Road have reached the point were there shot.]d be strong concern about yet another of our once attractive entrances to the City becoming an unsightly and inefficient (from a transpor- tation standpoint) commercial strip. Platting requirements do provide some measure of control over how things develop in the ETJ; however, land uses can only be evaluated if the property in annexed and zoned. Land use along this portion of the F.M. 2181 corridor became a prominent issue when the developers of the Hickory Creek Mobile Hoare Park applied for plat approval and extension of City of Denton utilities in 1984. Permission to extend off-site water and sewer facilities was granted and the decision was made to not annex the mobile home park after the developer pledged that it would be built to City of Denton standards. The fir'l plat of the 61,121 acre mobile home park was approved on Agri.. 24, 1984. The Jay-Mar Addition, a 5.663 Sore plat for commercial plumbing office and shop that adjoins the Fig-Art site to the east was approved in October, cc lorwat page 2 1985 without annexation. Development of comiAarcial buildings and placement of mobile homes on other tracts in the area has become a comson occurrence in the last couple of years. HAMORO, URD : A finger or annexation strip along P.M. 2181 is located approxi- mately 2,500 feet north of this site; if a minimum 500 foot strip were extended from this point to the Denton/Corinth agreement line, approximately 3,700 linear feet and 43.04 acres would be affected. PROQRAMB, DF,PARIM UTS OR ORQUES AFPBCT&R, It annexed, all City of Denton departments or operations responsible for providing basic services; owners of property that would be included in the annexation. FISCAL IMP-ACT: Undetermined Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Ha ell Prepared by: City Manager David Rllison o2,!i" Senior Planner App ed. Jeff Me e Director of Plann ng and Development 18878 ~t I 63-maw ' ~ all,Ip ~j ~kY.~M Wtf k kµ► ~ . . 1i=NA of $co• /OOp~ soo, Lr'Met 1-11~1E 1 • ! '550 ?t6X)' lac /rr~rra t i `3. o FM, 2181 % 1~ '3700 :~C Soo' ~ ~f3 , o+~ q G _ t' UNTW j~ r LIN C ~i lei=•2UUc~F ~ \ \ r MAN'= Fig-Art Corporations .sii.l l t(? 22(1 10 1 t,;, West 15th Street Plano, Texas 73075 'iemtr:~mber 29, 1986 City of Denton PI anni ng and Commune ty Deve1 opmpnt Di vise on 215 E. hlr.k:il;rlpy St. Denton, TX 76205 Attentions Mr. David Ellison Director References Zoning - Fig--Art Addition Ger)t l omen s The Fig-Art Corp., owners of land located South of Denton City limits, and as per prior submitted drawing, dated 2-15-86, prepared by Metroplex Engineering Corporation, requests a "light industrial" zone permit so development can begin no 1 a-tter that) 10-15-86. The following items are some of the resamons we ur•yently reqL(L?gt expedient decisions. 1. Figley Corporation plans a 5000 SGlc,lare foUt steel building and a 1300 Square foot office building on the 169.Z' X 429.4' portion of the property. To meet current delivery schedl.cles, Figisy requires a building start date no later than 10-15-06. Fiq.l(ay Corpor•.Ation employe approximately 15 {.)gople. Because of an increased bztcklorg h orlinning tho first cl(_(arter of 1987, employment will he i nr.rea-,ead to 20 - 25 persons. 3. Skyfab, Inc. plans a 1c),001a square foot atrsol building, with 2 temporaty nffic,e buildir)cJS until siuch time that permanent offices can be con-..structed. This steel bc.lilding is schedulers to start on or about 12-1-86. The offices will be at one end of the Steel l)uildingq containing approximately 2000 square feat. 4. E-)kyfab, Inc. currently employs 17 peoplre, with a prig je(:-.- ed 20 - 23 in 19137, dependent on sa.le5. Figley Corporation f~tbrirates small miScellaneouS Steel items such as angle, bar, and flats c.cs-ied in the constre.lction industry. %,.yfcAb, Inc. dcasaigns, Prlgineeers, and Fawbricates custom aluminum wall Systems, which are used in conjunction with glass, et.c. in the construction industry. Both r_nmra<anie~:~ c:i.rr-runk.ly have naUc3nol distribution. t+ath busi rrc?SSes q as out f i riod a[j()vct, c r Hate iin e tremS~ Y small fire hmFzoard and nc) emisssion pollutants c~ro releAgod. Please consider the above and advise of yaor• decision on cjr• bef oru I Q-115-136. Very tr tit y yours A G~~sv t3eorg Arthur Fiy - Art Corporation Fr(,ini dent cc Metroplex Eng. Cu.-Tim Fisher Figley Corp. /I 36-IV OU Z October 15, 1986 Mr. Lloyd Harrell City Manager City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, TX 76201 k Dear Lloyds Thank you for your letter of October 9 requesting the opinion of the chamber regarding the City of Denton's renewal of its membership in the North Texas Com mission. • Ffrst, I would point out that the opinions expressed in this correspondence reflect my own personal viewpoint and should not be considered an official statement of the Denton Chamber of Commerce. As you know, &H official positions of the chamber ore determined by its 26-member board of directors, and I would not want to presume the feelings of the board individually or collectively. In theory, I personally approve of and support those things the North Texas Commission stands for and represents. No doubt, there needs to be an entity which unifies and promotes, the diverse collection of communities known as the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. An obvious point for debate would then center around whether or not the Council in fact considers the City of Denton a viable part of the Metroplex? Originally, the North Texas Commission was organized to market the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airportl it then made an attempt to serve as a major economic development umbrella organization. Over the years, both of these roles have been diminished significantly, and subsequently I understand one of the Commission's major areas of emphasis has now been directed toward developing and promoting the High Technology resources of the area. The Commission has recently hired and contracted with individuals who are considered experts in this particular field. DEMON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ACCR[WT&D O 414 PARKWAY P. o. DRAWER P DENTW TEXAS 76202.1719 TELEPHONE 817.30244M S~:J. Lloyd Harrell October 16, 1966 Page -2- Part of the Commission's program for accomplishing the aforementioned High Technology mission Includes a consortium of all institutions of higher learning In the Dallas-Fort Worth area. J understand that Dr. Al Hurley, president of North Texas State University, was involved In the initial task force to study and implement this program. If you have not already done so, I would suggest that you also solicit his opinions on this matter. I feel that it is also important to point out that organizations such as chambers of commerce, and the North Texas Commission in particular, are quite often misunderstood and rarely given credit for their efforts and accomplishments. For the most part, funding Is dedicated to general operations and a staff to provide a basic structure through which many different issues and needs can be addressed. By design, non-profit staff executives tend to remain behind the scenes and low key in their presence. One of the measures of our success is based on our ability to assemble the appropriate delegation of volunteers to "make things happen" if you will. Structurally the North Texas Commission is much like a chamber of commerce, however it has obviously built Its reputation and power base on key individuals from the cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. Traditionally, the suburbs and outlying cities have not had much of a voice In the overall policies and direction of the Commission, Personally, I have no quarrel or concern with this particular practice, but 1 am aware that it is perhaps offensive to some. I do, however, feel confident that Denton's visibility and economic Impact In the future will eventually give It more recognition within the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Although I am concerned about the $4,400 price tag, especially with our many needs for specific services right here at home, I would not want to appear defensivd when I say that now Is not the time to withdraw financial support for promotional organizations. The Denton Chamber Is presently facing some abnormally high membership attrition problems, even though its primary focus, as you know, Is to promote and sustain a local climate for sound and quality economic growth. Everyone benefits from the creation of new jobs and an expanding tax base, both the results of an effective economic development program. As a matter of record, I plan to recommend that the Denton Chamber of Commerce retain its $100 membership in the North Texas Commission in the 1987-88 Annual Budget. As I ;understand the dues schedule, all chambers of commerce pay the same minimum amount. In addition, I would also recommend that the City of Denton retain its membership in the North Texas Commission, but at a much lower rate. If acceptable by both parties, the Council might want to consider $190000 with the understanding that this figure would be re-evaluated when the City Budget Is more capable of supporting a larger amount. Lloyd Harrell October 15, 1986 Page -3- lather way, I certainly understand and appreciate the questions presented by the City Council and will be happy to respond further on this math if requested. Sine e , Char es . Carp-en er President do t3ener I Manager CWC/ms r I, 1 THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; COUNTY OF DENTON This Contract and Agreement made and entered into On the let day of May, A.D., 1986, by and between the pity of Denton acting by and through A. Ray Stephens, its duly authorizeJ Mayor, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and the North Texas Commission acting by and through its duly authorized President, North M. Blake, hereinafter referred to as the "Commission", WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, the Commission is an Independent, non-profit corporation established under the laws of the State of Texas for the purpose of developing and Implementing a comprehensive marketing program for the North Texas Region which Region includes Denton County and the City of Denton, Texas; and WHEREAS, the success or failure of the Commission's purposes and objectives has a direct Impact upon the health, comfort, safety, peace, good government and welfare of the citizens of the City; and WHEREAS, the City is charged with the responsibility of promoting and preserving the health, comfort, safety, peace, good government and welfare of its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties do hereby covenant and agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 The Commission shall commence the services contemplates to be furnished and performed hereunder on the let day of May, 1986. ARTICLE 2 The term of this contract and agreement shall be for a period of one year from the 1st day of May, 1986, ARTICLE City of Denton agrees to pay to the Commission as compensation for services rendered hereunder the sum of Four Thousand Three Hundred Fifty- Four and 00/100 Dollars 34,354.00) per annum, payable as follows; Annually ARTICLE 4 The Commission covenants and agrees to: (a) Design, develop and implement a regional narketing/comminieations campaign that will position the Region, and as such the City, pos- itively in the minds of a carefully selected audience of national and International business and governmental e;ceoutives, As the marketing program is totally regional in nature, the City's name may or may not be listed in related marketing literature. How- ever, It is the Commission's policy to make every reasonable effort to publicize the City's name in all literature within the Commission's control. (b) Design, develop and implement a routine, regionally-oriented pro- cedure for responding to qualified Inquiries. This procedure would provide for, but not be limited to, inclusion of a City developed and produced (Commission approved) response piece, (c) Design, develop and implement a pro-active regional aviation development program targeted toward fostering the continued devel- opment of DFW International Airport and all Metroplex aviation facilities. (d) Make available to citizens and residents of the City such mater- ials, including economic research, as it has and may develop, gather or produce for enhancing the economic health and well-being of the North Texas Region, (e) Develop and Implement a marketing/communications strategy to increase the region's, and where appropriate the City's, Interna- tional image, (f) Furnish periodic economic-type and comprehensive NTC news-type reports to the City's Chief Administrative Officer with the under- standing that such reports may also be furnished to the local news media for dissemination to the general public. (g) Continue its current successful programs and implement such new and Innovative programs as will further its corporate objectives and those in common with the City's interests and activities, (h) Advertise, where appropriate and practical, for the general promo- tional aid tourist attraction of City and its vicinity. ARTICLE It is covenanted and agreed that the Mayor of the City shall be an ex- offieto member of the Board of Directors of tht, Commission and, as such, is the City's designated representative to vote the city's membership shares at all official elections of the Commission, if the Mayor is unable to serve, his position on the Board will be filUld by the City's Manager. ARTICLE b The Commission agrees to assume and does hereby assume all responsitil- ity and liability for damages sustained by persons or property, whether real or asserted, by or from the carrying on of work or in the performance of services performed and to be performed hereunder. The Commission coven- ants and agrees to, and does hereby indemnify and save harmless the City and all of its officers, agents, and employees from all suits, action or claims of any character brought for or on account of any Injuries or damages, whether real or asserted, sustained by any person or property by or in consequence of any neglect, omission, act or conduct of Commission, its agents, servants or employees. ARTICLE_Z Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 2 above, it is agreed this contract may be cancelled and terminated by either party upon giving thirty (30) days written notice so to cancel or terminate to the other party hereto, The terminal 30 days shall commence upon receipt of such notice by the addressee and shall conclude at midnight on the 30th day thereafter. In the event this contrael terminates under the provision of this paragraph either unilaterally or by agreement of the parttes, if not otherwise stipu- lated, it is agreed only the pro-rata portion of the terminal monthly installment for service shall be paid on the Ist of such terminal month. Upon payment or tender of such amount, all of the City's obligations here- under shall be discharged and terminated and no action shall lie or accrue for additional benefit, consideration or value for or based upon the ser- vices performed under or pursuant to this agreement, ARTICLE 8 Commission shall pay all taxes, royalties, and expenses Incurred In connection with services under this agreement, except as provided in Article 3 here[n. ARTICLE Commission shall observe and abide by all applicable federal laws, state statutes and the Charter and Ordinances of the City, and all rules and regulations of any lawful regulatory body acting thereunder in connec- tion with the services performed hereunder, ARTICLE 10 No member of or delegate to tha Congresn of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this contract or to any benefit arising therefrom, ARTICLE 11 No member, officer or employee of the City or of any local public body, during this tenure or one (1) year thereafter, shall have any Interest, direct or indirect, In this contract or the proceeds thereof. This prohi- bition is not Intended and should not be construed to preclude payment of expenses legitimately incurred by city ftloials in the conduct of Commis- sion business, i ARTICLE 12 Venue of any action brought on or under this agreement shall lie exclu- sively to Denton County, Texas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be signed by their proper corporate off!cers as first above specified, and have paused their proper corporate seal to be hereto affixed the day and year first above written. CITY OF DENTON BY: A. Ray Stephens Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney NORTH TEXAS COMMISSION Date Worth M. Blake President ATTEST.-. Arthur L, Ruff Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Hal Thorne General Counsel _ . 4 W" of DAWT0N DRNTON, TRUS YS"I MEMORANDUM DA'L'E: October b, 1986 TOt Rick Svenla, Assistant City Manager FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer SUBJECT: DESIGN OF WEST HICKORY-WELCH TO BONNIE BRAE The design concept of Hickory has several considerations. Our descriptions are for the project length only. They do not reflect off-site conditions. If the entire length is ctianged to one-way operation (Oak would be also) the pavement requirements would be for a 37 foot atroet. This will provide for three full traffic lanes. If the road remains in its (~xiating configuration: one-way from Welch to Avenue C, two-way from Avenue C to Bonnie Brae,, the requirements would be as follows, 3/ foot street - Welch to Avenue C 45 foot street - Avenue C to Bonnie Brae This will provide for three traffic lanes in the one-tray area and four traffic lanes in the two-way area. A concept with the whole langths of Hickory and Oak being one-way will create a safer, more efficient traffic system that will better be able to handle larger flows in the future. Signalization costs are reduced along with accidents since some of the most dangerous conflicting movements are elimi- nated. Cost savings will be realized from Avenue C to Bonnie Brae byy eliminating one traffic lane. The total savings will be about $60,000 for Hickory based on eight inch asphalt pavement. This money could be used for extra d;:pth asphalt, turn lanes, or other design features if used on this project. The other issue in question addresses the one-way section from Welch Street to Avenue C. Existing pavements range from 36.5 feet to 41 feet of street, Most ,,t tail area has parking except for the ro cent restrictions between Fry and Avenue B on the south side. A bike-lane has been located in the area where narking was removed. The roads currently have two eight foot parking lanes with two 11 foot or 12 foot travel lanes. These widths vary slightly de- pending on the exact location. If all parking is removed, the three lanes kick Svehla October o, 1986 Page l will carry traffic. If one or more parking lanes is a permanent solution, the design thickness of the pavement should be reduced from s g t inches to four inches. For a one parking lane, reduction to a four inch thickness, these savings are about $11,000 for the 2,000 foot section. To keep two parking lanes and two travel lanes, a 41 foot section is needed. Savings by using a 37 foot section for 2,000 feet are $17,500. in summary, long range goal for the most efficient and safe traffic system would involve making Oak and Hickory one-way from Carroll to Bonnie Brae to create a couplet. There are quite a few side streets both between and to the nortn/south to allow easy turnarounds. 't'here are many obstacles to overcome to allow that to happen. lmmediate construction savings from the 37 foot section are about $60,000 on the 5,250 foot project. We recommend this option if possible. A second alternative that we recommend is the 37 foot section in the one-way section between Welch and Avenue C. Cost savings on that will total $17,500 if all parking is removed so the 41 foot section does not have to be built. If parking lanes are approved, cost savings from a reduction in pavement thickness from eight inches to four inches will save about $110000 for the2,UOU foot section per lane. The second parking lane being added results in a negative tb,50U, since the street has to be widened. ?lease advise if further information is needed. errs ar k(J as 1583s L___j L___j I JL_~j LJL ~=EJEA Ll ~oEJ ICI ~ °~0 QEJ 000 o o~ooo ~ Cl~i1A F1 li AWITOMM FL EARL EMOOO~O ~ ° ;Lo F-I li F Svc "Soc --PAO Ila FIE D4 li 4 -MCC-- 1 a El __J U Ui • L___J Uhl __J L.__a~___j Lum. ~'o U LL-ij I ' ~r Ll7=nQ[nC~d~ J _ Lj.J n ~cmrtul►[ J n nad~ Ir_ - _ ~Onn Il._ nQVSt P ~ I C PEARL aM~ 13 13 lid rr- ! tLRR I1IIf_ ~ _ - ;i 1Ii 1If _ n L. 7"~". n Srr SYCAMORE ~ E 11 D 0 a ~~C3J LI PRA-R[ J L I FRAME n + =MAW ~r 71 IE Q ~ 1 Vl I I I HfrgI AND IL L-JL _-J MWV - 14W>04 Lam-] 1 "'i LWA HAK n ~ ncnEl 0 F7 1 e JOINT CITY COUNCIL, G PUISLIC UTILITIES BOARD AGENDA ITIM! 44 TOs MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FRONS Lloyd Harrell, City Manager REs Utility Department Manageoreut Review ACPION KEQUIKED Receive Utility Department Management Review, SUMMARY The purpose of this Management Review has been to turn up opportunities for improvement of management practices in or related to the Denton Municipal Utilities, and to suggest possible directions for constructive action and further study where needed. The focus has not been on problems faced; indeed, it has been the position of the Public Utilities board that the Utility Department was already functioning well and the question has been, "How can this well-run entity be made to function even more effectively and efficiently?" A strong effort has been made to incorporate, and keep in balance, the following: Utility board guidelines and inputs throughout the Study. Utility managers' perception of needs and ideas for improvement. Support departments' responses and suggestions for effective working relationships, City Manager's review and general suggestions. I wish to thank the Public Utilities Board for their guidance and direct contributions to the Management Review. Prepared by: Respectfully, Dr, C. L. Littlefield ~k4mapj ~ ~ W~ Management Review Coordinator oy e , y gr. APPROVED: ~zt_... it. E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT is Final Report- Utility Management Review 4517U0 (separate cover) Executive Summary October 1, 1986 City of Denton Denton, Texas 76201 Honorable Mayor, City Council and Members of the Public Utilities Board At your request, and with the cooperation and assistance of City of Denton personnel, the 1986 Management Review of Denton Municipal Utilities has been completed. I am pleased to present the findings. The focus of this study was upon finding opportunities for improvement of management. practices wherever these were found to exist. A sale-evaluation approach was utilized, with active participation by utility managers, representatives of support departments, and Public Utility Board members. The process of working through the self-evaluation was itself worthwhile. Utility managers were able to use the study as a vehicle for offering suggestions to higher administrators and heads of support departments, who, in turn, had opportunities to explain `hair ruints of view and operating constraints. The resulting dialogue was highly constructive and marry times led to mutual understanding and accommodation. I would like to express ury appreciation for the time and interest of the many managers and employees who contributed to the study, and I am especially indebted to the Public Utilities hoard for the guidance provided during the conduct of this assignment. I will be pleased to commer,i on or clarify any information presented herein, ind riease feel free to call on !i,a. Respectfully submitted, CO a. Littlefield, PHD ;ianagement Consultant - F 71 PARF'wtig , Denton, in 1905, acquired for the grand sum of $6590000 the electric system then serving the City. In the intervening eighty years, the utility system, including water distribution and treatment, wastewater collection and treatment, as well as the electric system, have grown to have a present net wc:th of $71 million, ihiring this time, operating under three successive and different systems of city government, the Utility Department has performed efficiently and served the people of this community with these essential services at reasonable cost and with reliability. This must be emphasized. The Public Utility Hoard, when it came to consider the Management Audit required by the City Charter after reviewing the audits made in 1962 and 1977/1978 and interviewing several applicants, began to realize that the conventional management study normally conducted did not fit the present needs of the Utility Department. It was, therefore, determined to recommend the employment of a coordinator with expertise in management to guide an intensive self examination of the Utility Department, its operations and its relationships with other departments. The survey involved the Public 'itility Board, the Utility Staff and sta"f from City departments serving the Utility Department and, because of the dialr;jue thus created, proved to be beneficial, not only to the Utility Department, but to the other City departments as well. No attempt has been made to evaluate long-term planning strategies, capital recovery fees, future generation needs, water supply sources, etc., although these realities are recognized in statements by individual board Members in Part VI of this report. .s' Ro and Lane , Chairman P blic Utility Board EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The members of the Public Utilities Board were faced with a requirement in the City Charter that a management audit of the Utilities Department should be conducted at least once every ten years, and the most recent management audit had been completed in 1978. The Board studied alternative approaches and decided to recommend to the City Council that a preliminary study be carried out in order to derive the maximum benefit from the required management audit, and that this study should utilize a self-evaluation approach that would focus upon opportunities for improvement of management practices, with the utility staff members and the beard members actively participating in the study. The board also recommended retaining a professor of management from a nearby university to provide advice and serve as coordinator for the Management Review. The City Council approved, and the study was begun in October 1985. The main sources of information were the Utility Director and his staff, each member of management in the Department, the heads and certain key personnel of other departments providing support services, the Coordinator and the Board itself. Questionnaires and interviews were utilized by the Coordinator to obtain information from utility management personnel and from supporting departments. The head of each utility division and each support department then made a presentation to the Public Utilities Board in which he described the organization and operation of his unit, offered suggestions, responded to questions, and entered into general discussion with the Board. PAGE 3 Much constructive discussion resulted, and the participants seemed to welcome the opportunity to take a fresh look at management practices and to discuss working relationships with other managers. Policies and procedures that had been set up to meet earlier conditions were often found to be no longer appropria?c: or needed. In many instances, the dialogue led to mutual understanding and accommodation. One manager commented; "The process may have been gust as important as the product." The scope of management areas examined was broad. The principal findings and recommendations are presented in the body of the report. More detailed information from the divisional and departmental presentations and discussions with the Public Utilities board are included in the excerpts from Minutes of the Board for the meetings in which the Management Review was discussed; these are presented as Appendix C to the report. The principal recommendations for improvement and for further study are summarized below. Organization 1. in order to ensure that the Utility Department is effectively managed, the City Manager, the City Council and the Public Utilities board should; a. Hold the Utility Director and his staff accountable for certain key results, and agree upon the key result areas and upon how these results can be reported and monitored. b. Delegate to the Utility Director and his staff the effective control over resources needed to achieve the desired results in view of the unique needs of the Utility Department, and screen decisions now made in central staff units in the City government with a view to decentralizing these decisions where there is sufficient evidence that they could be made more effectively within the Utility Department. PAGE 4 ` . . 2. The position of the utility Director should be elevated to the sans organisational level and salary as the Assistant City Manager positions and the Assistant Directors over the Electric and the Water add wastewater Treatment departomts should be made Directors with corresponding salaries. These changes are justified by the budgetary and service responsibilities carried, the managerial and professional skills required, and the salary levels paid by other cities for these positions. 3. The Electric Production superintendent position should be developed into Electric Production Manager, with appropriate reclassification, and the Assistant Production superintendent position should be retained, because of the need to include the management of power production and procurement of power from alternate sources. 4. The Secretarial Pool for utility management personnel in the Service Center should be dicentraliced because of needs for personalised secretarial and clerical service. Further study should be devoted to the organisation best suited to needs. 3. Three new staff positions are now justified and are recommended within the Utility Department to meet present and evolving usedss r ao bU et and Rate Anal stt Needed to assist with forecasting, planning, rate studies and providing better information to division aanageres b. Systems Anslnt for Utilities.' Needed to provide special help with computerisation of several major systems within Utilitioul including work orders and schedulings cost control, productivity studies, plant maintensace, rata studies, and other areas that appear to be over-due for system updating. PAGE 5 Cs Energy Management Specialist: Needed to combine and head the functions of on-site energy audits, energy conservation information, and meter audit support to the Customer Service Department. Planning, budgeting and Operations 1. The complexity and volume of long-range planning activities for electric, water and wastewater treatment services seem to justify a planning staff to forecast needs, plan for new facilities, and make other related plans. It is recommended that the Utility Director in consultation with the Assistant Directors, should develop a proposal and a time table for the organization of such a unit to cope with present and future needs. 2. The development of the Master Plan each year is viewed as a very serious undertaking, and the plans of the different operating divisions are pulled together effectively. There appears to be need to provide improved cost-benefit analysis to aid in decisions such as proposed plant modifications and equipment replacements, calling for better accounting information. There is also need for more systematic follow-up on action plans; this is already recognized and merely needs to be scheduled. 3. Budget preparation seems to go smoothly except that both division managers and Board members express a need for more lead time for study of the budget, and Board members feel that their review of the budget could be facilitated by receiving a budget summary in narrative form. 4. For budget monitoring throughout the figcal year, managers need more specific and timely information from Accounting on project costs, purchase order encumbrances, vehicle maintenance and other expenditures. PAGE 6 S. Aanagers feel that they should be allowed somewhat more flexibility in transferring funds between accounts than the present "lock-out" procedure permits, in view of the responsibility delegated to them and the uncertainties of budget estimates. 51 There is need for greater support to division heads in computerization of work orders and scheduling, productivity analysis, cost control., inventory control and fixed asset accounting. Team study is needed, with managers participating and being assisted by a coaputer systaas specialist who has sufficient time dedicated to this work to take initiatives and work with operating managers while systems are redesigned and implemented. It is recommended that the Utility Uirector and the Assistant Directors should constitute one or more of such teams and give them the needed charge and support. 7. Mapping needs of the Utility divisions should be studied more systematically than has yet been possible, starting with basic elements for which software may be available for microcomputers at relatively low cost and which might be feasible in the near future, and proceeding to larger systems that might be feasible later, perhaps in conjunction with other City departments. it is recommended that the Utility Director and the Assistant Directors should constitute a study team to carry out such a study and support its efforts. 8. A general recommendation is made that the Utility Department managers shout-' be allowed a higher level of control over the resuurces needed in their operations than they have been allowed in the past, and they be allowed and encouraged to compare costs of internal staff services with costs of the same services where available externally and make such choicits. PAGE 7 It IgtAms with Support Departments --Data Pry M 1. Tan strongest need is for more support to the Utility Department in regard to systems analysis of present and potential. data processing applications, using both mainfraw and microcomputers. Such help might take the form of either (1) Data Processing assigning more staff time to actively encouraging and assisting with systems changes in Utilities, or (2) Utility Department assigning one staff member to systems analysis for Utilities, either creating a new position for, this purpose or raking part-time use of an individual who is alrmady an employee of Electric Production and who has special background in computer systems analysis. 2. In view of growing demand on the part of Utility managers for microcomputers to handle special-purpose applications, more help should be given in regard to effective usage, linkage and access to the mainframe, and software acquisition and adaptation. 3. In general, Utility mangers would like to see Data Processing r provided with resources that are needed to function in a more active and innovative mode with regard to systca improvements for Utilities than has been possible under the present organization which was established primarily as a hardware and software operations and maintenance group and approved by the city Council in 19814 --Finance grad Accounting 1. There is a high degree of agreement between Utility and Finance managers on the need for a teas approach to redesign the accounting system for Utilities, and for giving such an effort high priority. Such a study group should include representatives from the two departments and from Data Processing, as a minimum. The study group might first be asked to develop a conceptual framework of a utility accounting system that would meet the following criteria: PAGE 9 k ♦a r a. Provide information on costs and revenues for each division that would show profit or loss for each fiscal yeare be Provide information for each project as needed for holding managers accountable, monitoring productivity, and controlling budgets, co Provide information on costs and revenues by user categories that will provide a valid bast for %ate determination# d. Provide information on individual fixed assets that will include cost of purchase, repair costsp and replacement cost. The some group might then be asked to serve as a task force in carrying the project through to completion. The question of whether outside consulting assistance in Utility Accounting is needed should be addressed by the task team. Z• The financial reporting system should be developed and made to provide timely information for utility managers on expenditures and revenue's, cumulative expenses on projects of long duration, and budget encumbrances for purchase orders. Improvements of these types would be facilitated by the redesign of the accounting system and they should be worked out in discussions between representatives of Utilities and Financ6o 3e became of past problems with availability of funds for motor vehicle purchases mad because of the involvement of several departments in the use of the Motor Pool Fund, the City Manager has instituted certain task team studies that are intended to improve the functioning of this fund. The Utility manglers wish to suggest that among the results that should be sought in the haadlimg of this fund are the followings adequate authorisation of expenditurest charges against proper budgets, PAGE 9 Provision for, a fair return on investment to departments providing funds, and current monitoring and reporting of balances. --Personnel Department 14 The time required to fill job vacancies is often three to four weeks or longer and when units work shorthanded , operations suffer and customer service is impaired. Good applicants often take other jobs rather than wait out the formal hiring procedure. The assignment of an additional person to preliminary interviewing seems to warrant early attention. !letter communication by utility division heads regarding special needs is also suggested. 20 Recommendations for promotions must clear the in-house advancement procedure which often takes a considerable amount of time. The policy and procedure may need to be made more flexible, and utility managers need to do a better job of communicating with Personnel regarding recommendations for promotions and chains of promotions. 30 Discharge and disciplinary action are among the most difficult of problem areas for utility supervisors, and Utility managers would like to see Personnel search for ways of allowing supervisors a higher degree of freedom and discretion in dealing with such problems, while remaining at a reasonable level of conformance with legal requirements. At the same time, Utility managers should take full advantage of a training program on documentation and disciplinary action that is now offered by the Personnel Department. 4. New positions become necessary because of increasing workload, changes in technology, and other reasonsf and Utility managers feel that new position requests that clear the budgeting process should not require approval by the Personnel Department as they do now, even though they require classification end other processing by Personnel. This issue seems to justify the attention of the City Manager. Also, the lengthy time periods PAGE 10 Involved may justify the assignment of additional staff to the job classification process during the peak load of activity after the new budget becomes effective. 5. The job classification system is not well understood by the Utility managers. The philosophy and guidelines of the system should be explained more fully by Personnel, and the managers should be encouraged to take advantage of the job specification and classification seminars that are offered annually by the Personnel Department. In the classification process, it seems likely that more input regarding lschnica, aspects of utility jobs are needed, and pooled, rather than individual, judgements should be utilized. A comprehensive review of the fob classification system is recommended. 6. Salary administration is a major problem area for Utility managers because of the growing need to compete for employees with other utilities and private companies in the Metroplex for people with similar skills. Salary surveys should be directed awiinly to such employers in the Metroplex, and they should include jobs for which skills are scarce and competition keen such as engineering; then, the realities of pay at premium levels to hire qualified people with scarce skills should be recognized by the City Council and City administrators. The Utility Department is now at a serious disadvantage in filling engineering, lineman and other technical positions and in holding employees in these positions; and it is paying a high price in terms of lost opportunitiese 7. There is need to shorten and simplify the performance review procedure and to make it sore meaningful. This procedure is now under study by the Personnel Department, 8e Utility managers feel that they consistently have received good support in the Training area from the Personnel Department. PAGE 11 There are continuing challeuges to provide 'opportunities for employees to learn and to make training methods more effective. Asnagars feel that they must provide much of the needed technical training internally and must continue to have the option of sending employees to programs offered by universities and other external agencies. 9. There is now a "gap" period in health insurance coverage between the time when some employees are eligible to retire, of ter twenty-eight years of service, and the time when they become eligible for Redicare. This is causing some to Peel that they must continue working during this period. The insurance package should be reviewed with particular concern given to medical coverage after retirement. --Purchasing and Inventor Control 11 A better inventory control system is needed to serve the needs of the Utility divisions, which use more than three-fourths of the materials purchased and stored for the City. A manual system i:, now used, and it is no longer adequate for maintaining supply of needed materials and protecting against shortages. There is general agreement that much of the system should be computerized, covering especially inventory levels, ordering quantities, reorder points, follow-up with suppliers, materials costs related to jobs, and related information. Because of the widespread dependence of all City departments upon Purchasing and Inventory Control, it is recommended that the City Manager authorize the formation of a task team to develop criteria for an inventory control system and to work with Purchasing in obtaining or designing a system that will most current and future needs. The task team should include representatives of Purchasing, Data Processing, Utilities and other using departments. ?AGE 12 1. There is need for better coordination of work orders and materials requirements, with Utilities supplying information on jobs and projects coming up and Purchasing having materials available when needed. Informal discussion regarding information needed and procedures to be followed should produce the improvements needed. 3. Training of warehouse personnel in identifleation of technical materials used in the Utility divisions seems to justify the joint attention and effort of the two departments. --Vehicle Maintenance 1. The City Garage has many demands upon Ito facilities and personnel by the various City departments, but Utility managers believe that the priorities of the Garage should more accurately reflect what is at stake in downtime of Utility vehicles--service opportunities lost, costs of labor and equipment, and delay of other activities that depend upon utility service. 'l. More study of private maintenance service alternatives seems warranted, with more information provided to Utility managers. 3. Provision for minor servicing of vehicles within the Utility Department appears to have good potential for assuring preventive maintenance as needed, detecting repair needs before major problems occurt minimising delays and incoavsnience, and quite possibly reducing long-term costs. PAGE 13 Cuatomsr and Community Relations 1. Substantial improvements have been achieved during the past year in billing accuracy, follow-up of customer complaints, promptness of handling of customer orders and requests, and collection of past-due accounts. Further improvements are planned through procedures improvement, job broadening, employee training, and improved follow-through with customer requests. 21 The .:ustomer Service Department needs technical support in field follow-up of customer complaints regarding high bills. This function is related closely to energy audits, energy conservation programs, and public information services now provided by the Utilities Department. It is recommended that the Customer Services Manager and she Utility Director should explore possibilities for a merger or combination of these functions that might justify a sufficient number of technically-qualified persons to follow up on high bill complaints and to pursue a more vigorous program of on-site inupections for improved energy consumption. Major Policy Issues Now Facing Utility Department and Public Utilities Board Certain major policy issues now face the Utility Department and the Hoard. Members of the board agreed that for their own guidance and for the information of the City Council, the City Manager and interested citizens, a carefully formulated statement of these issues should be developed as a part of the Management Review. Areas selected by the Board for concentration include: o Utility Services to be Provided and Areas to be Served o Utility Kates o Relations with the Texas Municipal Power Agency o Future Power Supp.'.y o Water and Wastewater Treatment Supply and Demand o Alternatives for Meeting Denton's Capital Funding Needs These statements regarding policy issues constitute the final section of the Management Review Report. PAGE 14 Ct.BA44 Y JANE MARSHALL SCHOOL AND EVALUATION CENTER P.O, Box 2881 • Denton, Texas 74202 Phone (817) 585-1976 yVIA s Sharon K, Morris 1 ~ 1 ,i Director CI MA AGRRS 1r September 15, 1986 Mrs, Charlotte Allen 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mrs, Allen, The Jane Marshall School will sponsor a Children's fine Arts Series in Denton this year. The performances are scheduled at NT4IJ Concert Hall on the following dates: February 14 Folk Singers from Canada March 7 Yankee Doodle Dandy, the Broadway Production April 11 Aladdin and His Magic Ifamp, National Marionette Co, We would like to request a place on the City Council agenda to ask permission to place a banner (comparable to the one used for Spring Fling) across from Kibler's to the Texas Department of Human Resources in order to publicize the events. Thank ynu for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Sharon K. Morris Director SM/lw Board of Directors Victor Alvarez,M.D. • Bill Atkinson, D.V.M. • BobbleCata • DonCluils • dackleHavenhlN • MarjorieKeele,WD. • Hampton Miller,M.D. • Bob Powere • David White • Michael Wiebe, Ph.D. • Donald Wright ~.4 o-9, ClTYof DENMN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 70201 / TELEPHONE (817) 500-8307 ot1106 o/ tho City MRno"r M E M O R A N D U M. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Hugh Ayer, Chairman of the Special Citizens Advisory Committee on Capital Improvements DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEE REGARDING PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM The committee is pleased to forward to you the attached information and our recommendation for a proposed Capital lmprovements Program for the City of Denton. We have deliberated for several weeks on this issue and unanimously approved this plan at our meeting on October 13. Subsequent to that the plan was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 15 and again was given unanimous support, We stand ready to discuss these recommendations with you on October 21. Thank you. Hugh e r c_ ca 2415C BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMFNDATION FOR CITY OF DENTON FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 15, 1986) 1986-1987 PROJECT COST East Community Center 1,2001000 Lillian Miller Parkway Widening 450,000 Taylor Park Drainage 300,000 Woodrow Bridge 250,000 Turn Lanes 230,000 Animal Control Center Expansion 185,000 Upgrade of Carroll & University Signal Systems 170,000 New Signal Installations 145,000 Pecan Creek Drainage 110,000 Audra Lane Drainage 90,000 Burning Tree Drainage 640000 Signal at Loop 288 and US 380 640000 Stuart/Selene 50,000 Athletic Field Development 50,000 Evers Park Sidewalk 40,000 Study Drainage Regulations 25,000 Traffic Study 25,000 Sidewalk on Hercules 15,000 TOTAL $3,463,000 15908 BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE; RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY OF DENTON F..*.VE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 15, 1986) 1987-1988 PROJECT COST Senior Center Expansion $ 750,000 Athletic Field Development 550,000 Improve Woodrow Lane 525,000 Rebuilding of Existing Bell Avenue 450,000 (with present alignment) Nillow Springs Drainage 3370000 Malone Street Drainage 250,000 Mingo Road Traffic & Drainage Improvements 250,000 Teasley Lane 200,000 Burning Tree Bridge 150,000 Traffic Study, Phase II 75,000 Teasley Lane Drainage 500000 Traffic Signals 25,000 TOTAL $3,612,000 15900 BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY OF DENTON FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 15, 1986) 1988-1989 PROJECT COST Neighborhood Center $10300,000 Fire Station 500,000 Update Master Drainage Plan 425,000 Land Acquisition/Parking Development 400,000 for Library Expansion FM 2181 (Teasley Lane): Four-Lane divided 250,000 from IH-35E South to Ryan Road Athletic Field Development 250,000 Fire Equipment 200,000 Plans for Law Enforcement/Court Complex 200t000 Davis Street Paving 500000 Avenue E Improvements (Eagle Drive to IH-35 Service Road) 40,000 TOTAL $3,615,000 15908 BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY OF DEN'rON FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 15, 1986) 1989-1990 PROJECT COST Loop 288/Local Participation: Four-Lane $2,2001000 divided from US 380 aouth to near IH-35E Loma Del Rey Drainage 625,000 US 380/Local Participation: Six-Lane 600,000 divided from US 77 (Locust) to Loop 288 Expansion of Nottingham. (from US 380 500,000 to Mingo Road Law Enforcement/Court Complex 500,000 Stuart/Sunnydale Drainage 350,000 Drainage improvements in Holly Hill area 300,000 US 380 Right-of-Way Acquisition 250,000 TOTAL $5,325,000 15903 BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY OF DENTON FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 151 1986) 1990-1991 PROJECT COST Law Enforcement/Court Complex $1,900,000 Neighborhood Center 11400,000 Fort Worth Drive (US 377): Four-Lane 1,0650000 divided from IH-35E to FM 1830 Library Expansion 6000000 Athletic Field Development 450,000 Reconstruction of Oriole Street 117,000 Fort Worth Drive/James Street Drainage 90.000 TOTAL $5,622,000 15908 Ae BLUE RIBB N CITIZEN'S CO!!MI LE R C MEN AT pN FOR F~_YEAR CAPITAL ROVBMgNT PLAN 1986-1987 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Project Cost Neighborhood Center, Southeast Denton Loma Del Rey Drainage $10,8001000 Lillian Miller Parkway Widening 825,000 Bridge on Woodrow Lane 450,000 Reconstruct Oriole Street 2500000 East McKinney Street Culvert 1170u00 Sidewalk on Hercules 250000 TOTAL $3,482,000 BLUE RIBBON CIP COMMITTEE Project cost East Community Center Lillian Miller Parkway Widening 11200,000 Taylor Park Drainage 450,000 Woodrow Bridge 300,000 Turn Lanes 2500000 Animal Control Center Expansion 2300000 Upgrade of Carroll & University Signal Systems 1850000 New signal installations 170,000 Pecan Creek Drainage 145,000 Audra Lane Drainage 1100000 Burning Tree Drainage 90,000 Signal at Loop 288 and US 380 64'000 Stuart/Selene 64,000 Athletic Field Development 50,00Q00 Evers Park Sidewalk 5000 Study Drainage Regulations 40,000 Traffic Study 25,000 Sidewalk on Hercules 250000 15,000 TOTAL $3,463,000 Cost below Planning and Zoning recommenoation Suggested funding level for $.59 levy 190000 3,500,000 i 1590s BLUE RIBBON CITIZE_N,s COMMITTEE RECOMMEN ATION FOR FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IkPjtOVEMENT PLAN 19677,-1.9986 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Pro ect Cost Bell Avenue Relocation iFirst-, half? $104000000 Senior Center Expansion 750,000 Improve Woodrow Lane 525,000 Willow Springs Drainage 337,000 Stuart Road/Selene Drainage 3200000 Athletic Field Development 200,000 Plans for City Hall Exp&nsion 200,000 Animal Control Center Expansion 150,000 Signals Loop 288 and US 380 64,000 Traffic Signals _ 25,000 TOTAL $3,571,000 BLUE RIBBON CIP COMMITTEE Project cost Senior Center Expansion $ 7500000 Athletic Field Development 550,000 Improve-Woodrow Lane 525,000 Rebuilding of Bell Avenue 4500000 Willow Springs Drainage 337,000 Malone Street Drainage 250,000 Mingo Road Traffic & Drainage Improvements 250,000 Teasley Lane 200,000 Burning Tree Bridge 150,000 Traffic Study, Phase II 75,000 Teasley Lane Drainage 50,000 Traffic Signals 25,000 TOTAL $30612,000 Cost above Planning and Zoning recommendation 41,000 Suggested fundinl level for $.59 levy :3,600,000 15908 BLUE CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RE OMMENDATION FOR FIVE YEAR C- I R" LAN 19 -1989 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Project cost City Hall Expansion $1,100,000 Fire Station 500,000 Drainage Study 450,000 Drainage 350,000 Taylor Park Drainage 300,000 FM 2181 (Teasley Lane): Four-Lane divided 2500000 from IH-352 South to Ryan Road Athletic Field Development 200,000 Fire Vehicles 200,000 Burning Tree Bridge 1500000 Oversize Paving 1500000 Burning Tree Draina,,je 64,000 Avenue E improvements (Eagle Drive to IH-35 400000 Service Road) Davis Street Paving _15,.000 TOTAL $3,769,000 BLUE RIBBON CIP COMMITTEE Project Cost Neighborhood center $1,300,000 Fire Station 500,000 Update Master Drainage Plan 425,000 Land Acquisition/Parking Development 400,000 for Library Expansion FM 2181 (Teasley Lane): Four-Lane divided 2500000 from IH-35E South to Ryan Road Athletic Field Development 2500000 Fire Equipment 200,000 Plans for Law Enforcement/Court Complex 200,000 Davis Street Paving 50,000 Avenue E Improvements (Eagle Drive to IH-35 Service Road) 4(1x.000 TOTAL $3,61'i,000 Cost below Planning and zoning recommendation 154,000 Suggeeted funding level for $.59 le,;y 3,800,000 15904 BLUE RI 0 CIT N'S COMMITTER P.ACOMMRNDATION FOR FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPRQV~MEN _LAN M9_1990 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Pro ect Cost Loop 28d,'".ocal Participation: Four-Lane $2,2000000 divided from US 380 south to near IH-35E US 380/Local Participations Six-Lane 105000000 divided from US 77 (Locust) to Loop 288 City Hall Expansion 10100400 Drainage Improvements in Holly Hill area 300,000 US 380 Right-of-way Acquisition 2500000 Athletic Field Development 200,000 Audra Lane Drainage 90,000 TOTAL $5,6400000 r'.UE RIBBON CIP COMMITTEE Pro ect Cost Loop 288/Local Participation: Four-Lane $2,200,000 divided from US 380 south to near IH-25E Loma Del Rey Drainage 625,000 US 380/Local Participation: Six-Lane 600,000 divided from US 77 (Locust) to Loop 288 Expansion of Nottingham (from US 380 500,000 to Mingo Road Law Enforcement/Court Complex 500,000 Stuart/Sunnydale Drainage 350,000 Drainage Improvements in Holly Hill area 300,000 US 380 Right-of-Way Acquisition 250,000 TOTAL $5,325,000 Cost below Planning and zoning recommendation $ 315,000 Suggested funding level for $,59 levy $4,4500000 15903 ;-q I BLUE RIBB N CITI 8N'S CO MI TE RECOM NATION FOR 1990,_1991. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Pro ect Cost Recreation Center $1,800,000 Bell Avenue Relocation (Second half) 115000000 Fort Worth Drive (US 377): Four-Lane 1,065,000 divided from IR-35E to FM 1830 Athletic Field Development 600,000 Library Improvements 250,000 Traffic Study and Implementation 100,000 TOTAL $5,315,000 BLUE RIBBON CIP COMMITTEE Pro ect Cost Law Enforcement/Court Complex $11900400 Neighborhood Center 1,400,000 Fort Worth Drive (US 377); Four-Lane 10065,000 divided from IH-35E to FM 1830 Library expansion 600,000 Athletic Field Development 4500000 Reconstruction of Oriole Street 117,000 Fort Worth Drive/James Street Drainage 901,000 TOTAL $5,6220000 Cost above Planning and Zoning recommendation 307,000 Suggested funding level for $.59 levy 5,500,000 15905 STREE",S AND TRAFFIC REPORT FROM THE STREET CIP SUBCOMMITTEE The street subcommittee finished up its meetings on October 2, 1986. The main issues that confronted the committee were as follows$ 1. Should sona substitutions be made because of the $900,UU0 worth of surplus funding for U.S. 380 and because of the deletion of the oversizing? 21 Should the Bell Avenue rerouting be included in this bond proposal? 31 Should all of the projects be included in one proposition on the ballot? Substitutions were made for the excess funding that was available because of the deletion of the oversizing and because of the o verfunding of U6S. 380. The oversizing was deleted because the Council indicated in the budget that they wanted to increase the amount of developer participation in streets that were larger than residential, The Council has instructed that staff to rewrite the oversizing participation regulations. This regulation will require a maximum of 45' of paving from a developer versus the existing 34' of paving from a developer, These new regulations will virtually eliminate the need for oversizing funds on any facilities built by developers, It would require the developer ~o build up to four lane facilities without any participation from the City, 't'hus the $1509000 that was recommended by Planning and Zoning for the fiscal year 1988-1989 was deleted, The subcommittee was also able to take advantage of excess funuing for the U.S. 380 joint project between the State and Denton, ofe DeCity nton of total the last bond iimpr1981, ovements itand right -of -way acquisition to U.S. 380. In 1981, the State Highway Department indicated that U.S. 380 would be begun in 1984. Therefore funding was sot aside for that project. As we draw nearer to 1984-1985, the Highway Department indicated that the design of U65. 38U had been delayed and that they would not do U.S. 380 before 1986 or 1987, Subsequently, they have set it back to 1989 and 199U. When staff was informed of this, we conveyed this information to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the C:,ty Council. Rather than let that money sit idly in our invested funds, it was suggested that Planning and Zoning move some other projects up from later years in the CIP that were not funded. Planning and Zoning did this in 1984 and suggested that a number of proje.ta which would Improve traffic i r Street Subcommittee to port October 6, 1986 Page 1 movements throughout the City be the main focus of that $9000000. They further agreed that in the next bond issue, they would again reallocate Money for U.S. 380. The Council reviewed that recoamendation and approved it. This year while staff was having discussions with the bond council and financial advisors about using excess CIP fundu for additional projecte, the discussion moved to U.S. 380 and that plan to wove funds. During the discussion, the financial advisors asked us how the proposition had been phrased on the election proposal. We found that this particular $9UO,000 had been specifically called out for U.S. 380. After further consultation with thee, they advised us that since the wording in that particular proposal explicitly set out $900,000 for U.S. 380 it could legally be spent only for, U.S. 380. Staff immediately informed the Council. We not aside $9000000 for U.S. 360 and it in sitting in out separate CIF interest bearing accounts. All of these discussions occurred after Manning and Zoning had made the new recommendation to the Council that included total funding for the U.S. 380 project as indicated by the Highway Department. (As you will note, the Highway Department's estimate has changed from a construction cost of $700,000 to a construction cost of $1.5 million) Si•ace Planning and Zoning had recommended full funding and since the financial advisors and bold attorneys had indicated that the original $900,000 could not be spent, we in essence either had existing or recommended funding for a total of $2.4 million for U.S. 380. Since the indication, from the highway Department was that the total construction cost would be $1.5 million, we then have the excess of $900,000. It is this Money that was in the recommendation that the subcommittee chose to substitute for knd those substitutions are included in the first year of the subcommittee recommendation. The second major point that the subcommittee considered was whether the rerouting of bell Avenue should be included in this bond issue. The subcommittee received numerous calls, letters and comments from a number of people about the project. The overwhelming majority of these contacts were negative. Most of the people thought that this bell Avenue project should not be built and further more that the existing bell should not be closed. The subcommittee also considered the past Bell projects and alignments that had negative effects on prior bond issues. Taking theme factors into consideration, the subcommittee felt that this issue should be deleted froc this bond election. Street Subcommittee Report Octobor 6, 108b Page .1 The last major issue that the subcommittee reviewed was whether all of the•rest of these recommendations Should be considered as one proposal on the bond issue or as separate or packaged proposals. The subcommittee decided that all of these street improvements should be considered as one total package. The following is a list by year of the recommendations of the street and traffics subcommittee. 1086.1987 Cost in r(illions 1. Sidewalk on Hercules $.015 (Stuart to Buckingham) This was a small project which was included is the original Planning and Zoning recommendations. It was in response to neighborhood requests tc help school children in the Cinnings area get to school on sidewalks rather than in the street. 2, Lillian Miller Parkway widening $.450 This is the second pair of lanes for Lillian Miller. It would allow us to improve the facility to a four lane divided structure with left turns at major street intersections, The first two lanes and all of the drainage improvements were built under an assessment program to the developers in this area. Theme last two lanes would be at the City's total expense. 3. Evers Park sidewalk $,040 (Windsor to Evers School) This is a substitute project for the overfunding of U,S, 3bU. The sidewalk runs along the north aide of Windsor from Locust Street to Evers parkway and on the north side of Evers Park from Locust to the school. This is an attempt again to provide some safe walking areas for students that are attending Evers School, 4, 't'urn lanes $.230 (Dallas Dr, and Teasley, Carroli and Eagle, 135 and Lillian Miller) This project would build turn lanes to help improve traffic movements at the three intersections mentioned. At Dallas Drive and Teasley lane, these would be left turn lanes on Dallas Drive. At Carroll and Eagle, it would be a free right turn for south Carroll onto weetbouad Lagle, At 135 and Lillian Miller, there would be three free right turn lanes for northeast bound Lillian Ailler turning onto the southbound frontage road, for southwest bound Loop 288 turning right onto the Dallas Drive or business 77 frontage road or northbound 135 frontage road, and for the northbound frontage road turning northeast on to Loop 2886 This project is also a substitute project for the overfunding on U.S, 38U, Street. Subcommittee Report October 6, 1986 Page 4 5. New signed irstallationa '.145 (Mulberry and Carroll, Old North Road and U.S. 3800 Windsor and Sherman) These installations would be at the intersections mentioned. They would allow us to install new poles and state-of-the-art controllers and signal Pqulpment. This is also a substitute project. 61 Upgrade of Carroll and University 9.170 signal systems (Controller replacements ate Carroll and Hickory, Carroll and Parkway, Carroll and Congress, University and Alice, Carroll and University, Bell and University, Locust and University, Lim and University, Carroll and Cak) As noted, this would replace all of the controllers at the above mentioned intersections. it would allow us to replace them with state-of-the-art controllers that would be able to be linked to a central computer that is suggested to be funded in fiscal 1987-1984. This is also a substitute project. 7. Signal at Loop 288 and U.S. 380 9.064 This project hat, been moved up. It was part of the staff recommendation that was requested by Planning and Zoning. This would allow us to build a diamond interchange to facilitate the new construction at the overpass at Loop 288 and U.S. 380. 8. Traffic Study 9.025 This was a staff recommendation for the Planning and Zoning request. The study will allow us to do an appropriate review of all the new installations on Carroll and University, it will suggest timing schedules for different periods during the day. It will make suggestions on how the whole system should run and how it should be tied to the central computer. This was a substitute project from the excess funding levels on U.S 380 and it was also part of the recommendation that staff made to Planning and Zoning at their request. 198----+7-1--'}88 Cost In Hil 1. Improve Woodrow Lane 9.525 (McKinney to Spencer Road) This project would build a four lane divided facility from McKinney Street to Spencer Road and tie it to the existing Spencer-Colorado connection that leads to the mall. It would be built in conjunction with the Woodrow Lane bridge which is recommended to be built in 1986.1987 by the drainage subcommittee. it was an original recommendation from she planning and Zoning Commission. Street Subcommittee report October 6, 1986 Page 5 2. Teasley Lane =,l00 (Dallas'Drive to 135) Tnis funding was s recommendation from staff. It was recommenced in response ,to Planning and Zoning's request for additional proposals. Teasley was originally funded in the $10 million bond issue. In that issue we estimated or stretched our project to match Highway funding and to include this section of Teasley which was not included in the original state proposal. Since it is a Farm-to-Market road, the State has fined authority over design and review. We originally estimated the cost of this to be $17U,UOU. because we will be required to build it under traffic, move utility lines, and remove some concrete structures that have been built over the years and also acquire additional right-of-way at the Intersections, our new estimate is some $370,000. Therefore, va axe requesting an additional $200,000 to meet these requirements. 3. Traffic Signals $1025 (Replacement of one controller) This was an original recommendation by Planning and Zoning. It would allow us to replace our most mechanically deficient controller in the system when we get to this year, 4. Traffic Study Phase II $,075 (computer and tie-in to systom on Carroll and University) This will be the actual computer and the tie-in to the University and Carroll system, This was a staff response to the Planning and Zoning request for additional projects. This tie-in computer will allow us to analyze traffic instantaneously throughout the systems on University and Carroll. It will allow us to make each of these systems respond to pre-planned timing sequences or it will allow us to change signal operations individually as the need arises. it will also give us a dully history of the operation of each signal and help us to provide appropriate information to the police and legal departments on any claims lodged against the City for liability dealing with the signals. 5, Traffic and drainage improvements to $.250 Mingo Road This project is a substitute for the Bell Avenue deletion. It will allow us to make some basic improvements to Mingo Road between Ruddell and Hell Avenue. We will spend this money to make drainage replacements at Mingo and the channel crossing at the TWU golf course, Also drainage improvements to the intersection of Ruddell and Mingo, It will also allow us to make road widening@ to accommodate left turn lanes at Ruddell and possibly at the service Center and Frame street intersections, Any money that is left will also allow us to look at signalizing the intersection of Riddell and Mingo. Street Subcommittee Report October 6, 1986 Page 6 6. Rebuilding of bell Avenue $.450 (from Mingo to U,J, 380) This is also a substitute project for the deletion of the bell Avenue improvements. This would allow us to rebuild the existing bell Avenue from University to Mingo Road, It will also us to replace some curbs along this entire length where they used to be rebuilt. We will also look at minor improvements to the intersection of bell and Mingo and possibly U.S. 380 at bell Avenue. 198--- 88 1989 Cost ir, Millions 1. Avenue E improvements $,040 (Eagle Dr. to 135) This would project a two lane facility from the frontage road west of Avenue D and I35 to the intersection of Eagle and Avenue E. It would provide easier access to North Texas State from any place on the west aide of the campus directly from 135. This was an original recommandation of Planning and Zoning. 2. Davie'Street paving $.050 This is for a two block area of Davis Street. This project would run from Ruddell to Jennie Street. It is a residential street and an original recommendation from Planning and Zoning. It will provide a regular residential section and curb and gutter, 3. FM2181 - Teasley Lane $,250 (from 135 to Ryan Road) This additional funding is needed because of cost increases as indicated by the Highway Department. It will be to make Teasley Lane four lanes from 135 to Ryan !load. This is the original highway project and the funding ratio is approximately 4 to 1, that being the State's 4 to the City's 1 dollar. 198..- 9r---19 0 Cost in Hilliou-4 1. Loop 288 $2,20 (from U.J. 380 to Colorado Blvd,) This would make a four lane structure on Loop 288 from U.S. 380 to Colorado Blvd, It would provide for intersection improvements at major intersections such as dcKinney. rhis will be a state participation project. The cost benefit ratio is approximately 7 to It 2. U,S. 380 - University $4600 (from Locust to Loop 288) This would provide a six lane facility from Locust Street to Loop 288 with intersectiou improvements at major intersectione. This is the project that we eliminated $900,000 from since it was double funded after we received the information from the financial advisors and the bond attorneys, Street Subcommittee Report October 60 1986 Page 7 3. U,S, 380 right-of-way acquisition, $,250 This will fund the right-of-way acquisitictm for the above project. A will provide us with money to match the state for any right-of-way acquisition. The funding ratio will be $10 of state money for every $l.of ours. 4. Extension of Nottingham $.500 (from U,S, 38U to dingo Road) This project will provide for four lane improvement from U.S, 38U to Mingo Road. It will provide intersection improvements at Nottingham and University and at Mingo and Nottingham. $5U,000 worth of funding for right-of-way is included in this project and also $50,OOU for signal improvements at Nottingham and U.S, J60. The committee further made a recommendation that only $50,000 be spent on right -of -way and that if further right -of -way is needed then assessments should be made to property owners on both sides to cover the additional costs. This project is also a substitution for the Bell Avenue deletion. 1990-1991 Co in`~'J.8 1, Reconstruction of Uriole Street $.117 This project has been rescheduled. It was an original recommendation from Planning and Zoning, It is rescheduled because the Loma del Key drainage project will be done in connection with the Loop 288 construction and part of the main trunk line for system runs on Oriole Street, It will provide a residential street and new curb and gutter where needed. 2. Fort Worth Drive $1.065 (from 135 to FM 183U) This is another state project. It will provide for a four lane facility with intersection improvements at major crossings, It is a state matched project. The approximate match is 4 to 1 in favor of the City, la conclusion, the total cost of these projects is $7.736 million. The committee originally had some nine and a quartor million dollars worth of funding available to it, They voted turn approximately $1,3 million back to the chairman and the rest of the group to help fund other subcommittee overruns or other projects the whole committee felt were needed, They did, however, make one other suggestion that should be reviewed by the full committee, They suggested that as a number one priority for additional funding if funds are available, Ruddell Street. This would provide $300,000 for improvements to allow for a small amount of widening on Ruddell, The widening would provide for a median and some true left turn bays from Univar:;.i^y Drive to Mingo Road, It would be contingent on acquiiin,y the right-of-way from TWU, Street Subcommittee kleport October 8, 1986 Page 8 This concludes the final report of the Street and Traffic Subcommittee. We would be happy to discuss any further questions the committee chairman or the committee as a whole may have at the October 8 and October 13 meetings. ac MIIIe 911 rouc 311 UA ji DRAINAGE W' of WNtoN MWTON, TUUS F8801 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 6, 1986 rot Blue Ribbon Committee PROM: Bill Clairborne, Chairman of Drainage Committee SUBJECT: Pinal Project Selection and Timing - Drainage Tha memo showing the projects, their costs, and date of construction is enclosed. Each project will be briefly described below. 1986-87: A. Pecan Creek - This project involves about 1400' of concrete rli'nin for the channel through the Phoenix Apartments. Maintenance and flooding problems precipitated the request. B. Woodrow Bridge - This bridge is required to replace an existing low water crossing that experiences flooding of five to ten feet creating a dangerous situation. This is more serious since the route to the mall has been connected. C. Stuart/Selene - This will fund the large pipe necessary to cross the State right-o£-way of Loop 288 for me project now being completed with the Stuart/Pershing paving improvements, D. Drainage Regulation Study This will allow the consultant to update our drainage design manual and subdivision regulations to make them consistent with uther cities in the area. E. Taylor Park Drainage - This project includes S separate collection systems to get the water from the residential areas now being flonded to channels that will carry it away. page 2 of 3 pages F. Burning Tree Drainage -This will fund four collection M o n, 1 on Burning Tree, 1 on Old Lee Court) that should alleviate flooding caused by streets exceeding their capacities and running into homes that are lower than the street, G. A_udra Lane Urai,nage - Most of the system was built in lye 2. ome pippes were not able to be extended up Audra Lane and Old Paisley to the required locations withcrelationnto deep,'iflat'borrow ditchespthat hold water. 1987-88t A. Willow S rings - Culverts under Dallas Drive will be proper y s ze as will the culverts at Duncan Street and Willow Springs. The existing channel will be shaped to the proper section and a partial concrete bottom installed from Dallas Drive to the railroad culverts south of Kerley Street, 3. Teasley Lane - This will fund the drainage associated with the e Teasley Lane reconstruction between Dallas Drive and I35$. Funds will be placed with the street Issue. C, Malone - This pipe system will address the current fioo;3rng on Cordell and Malone just south of University, The water will be collected in inlets and piped to the channel east of the Newton Razor School, D. Burning Tree Bridge - The current bridge was constructed a out-'' years ago. 'Phis sizing Is inadequate which restricts the water In Cooper Creek, Cooper Creek has experienced ~t rest deal of development which has used up most of its capacity. This means the backwater created by the bridge ca~jses more problems than it should on a properly sized channel, The bridge does get under water and catch a great deal of debris. 1988.89: A. UDdate Master Drainage Plan - These funds will expand the master plan to 133 square miles so that the pity can properly review and plan for ultimate drainage. The recent development boom had tracts outside our current plan almost weekly, Both the City and developers will be able to properly analyze drainage at a much more reasonable cost. The committee has recommended that the plan have a charge attached to its use that will recoup some of the costs of its creation. Page 3 of 3 pages Stuart/Sunn dale_ A pipe system is needed to collect water ~r a n-"ort~h of Ki nga~ Row off Sunnydale, Valley View, and Stuart Road. The water will be piped to Cooper Creek on the east side of Stuart Road, 1989.90: A, HaILXhhilll/Lo_ _ngridge - A major storm pipe system needs to run up Longridge from Teasley Lane to Hollyhill to collect the large amounts of water coming out of Southridge. This project will not build all the other collection storm lines (an additional $300,000 is needed), It will address the most serious part of the current flooding problem. B. Loma Del Ke - 1'he entire Singing Oaks Subdivision between Mockingbird and Loop 288 from Kingfisher down to Hummingbird was built with no storm sewer systems. The street damage and home flooding on Oriole, Hummingbird, Cardinal and Kingfisher streets show the amount of water that, currently flows above ground through these areas. This project has to be coordinated with the construction of Loop 288 in the same year since the drainage outfall will need to run down Loop 288 to just south of McKinney. The State will not allow construction rior to that which could adversely effect their dpesign. Therefore, the outfall will be pro erly incorporated into their plans, the size o? their project will provide economies of scale. 1990-91: A. James Street - The culvert on James Street is greatly under sze3: The State will be rebuilding Ft. Worth Drive the same year. They will upgrade the under sized culvert there which will allow more water to reach James Street faster. It will be a necessity that the James Street culvert be upgraded at the same time, Hopefully, if funds allow, some channel shaping can be done to create the proper sized earth channel from Ft, Worth Drive south past James Street. 0418E N:M OFTY Of DENrOM DOII VN# TMS ?#So1 MEMORANDUM DATE: September )9, 1986 'r0: Blue Ribbon Citizens Committee FROM: Drainage Subcommittee SUBJECT; Final Recommendation for Bond Issue The meeting of September 17, 1986 was the second by the Drainage Subcommittee. A consensus recommendation was reached to keep the original 3.461 million dollars. The grouping of those projects by the proposed year are as follows: 1986 - 87 Pecan Creek $ 110,000 Woodrow bridge 250,000 Stuart/Selene 50,000 Study Drainage Regulations 250001) Taylor Park l00,OU0 Burninfa 't'ree 640000 Audra ne 90 0U0 1987 - 88 Willow Springs 337 000 Teasley 50,000 Malone 2SO,O00 Burning Tree Bridge 1S0 000 $`'1S'1'WW W 1988 - 89 Update Master Drainage Plan 41500OU Stuart/Sunnydale _ 3S0 000 J page 2 of 1 pages 1y89 - 90 Hollyhill/Longridge $ 3000000 Loma Del Rey. $ 6~Z625,000 1990 - 9'. Ft. Worth Drive/James Street 90100000 TOTAL PACKAGE $3,461,000 The committee agreed to spread out the projects over 5 years more evenly provided the first year is not touched or adjusted. Bill Claiborne, chairman, will make the presentation to the Blue Ribbon Committee with drainage as a separate $3,461,UUU bond issue. 0413H LIBRARY/CITY HALL/LAW BNFORCBMENT/COURT ~IM+~ Cj'~ N rOlplfl~OM, TtXAS MUNICIPAL WILDING / 215 F. MoIUNNEY ST. l DENTON, TEXAS AM M E M O a A N D U N TOs Hugh Ayer, Chairman, CIP Committee FRONs Joe Holland, Chairman, CIP Sub Group DATES October 2, 1986 SUBJECTS CIP Recommendation for Space Expansion/Library We feel the City should move on the space expansion issue as soon as possible and that the first consideration should be the building of a new Law Enforcement/Court complex which would meet most of our immediate needs. Alter a tour of the existing police facility, we feel that they have no options for future growth at their alto. Due to inadequate parking, no room for future office growth, and limited jail area, we feel there is an immediate need for a new complex. This woulds 1) Give the police an adequate facility and room for future growth and expansion. 2) Reduce the crowded conditions at City Hall by allowing City employees to use the 22,000 square feet freed up at the existing police station. 3) Enable us to get out of all of our rental contracts and move those departments to either City Hall or the existing police station. After such discussion and review, we would like to unanimously recommend the following facilities and year of considerations lot Year Law Enforcement/Court Complex *2.6 million 86-87l~ 3rd Year Land Acquisition/Parking Development $ .9 million 11-85 for Library Expansion Sth Year Expansion of Library .6 million 90-91 TOTAL $3.6 million 81715004M D/FW METRO 434-25W This request is an increase of $950,000 over the original $2.65 million suggested in the CIP recommendation. Our increases are as gOIIowa I ' 1) Added $350,000 to the =350400 originally set aside for the library expansion. The total $600,000 would allow a 10,000 sq.ft, expansion at the library, 2) inserted $400,000 for the purchase of land and the develop"nt of that land as parking tot the expanded library. By expanding the library we could lose up to half of the existing parking. This land purchase would provide for that lost parking as well as provide the expanded parking necessary to cover the larger facility. 3) Added $200400 more to the $2.4 million set aside for. expansion of city facilities to allow for the. construction of a new law enforceserkt/court .complex _at $2.5 million and the regovation.of the existing police station at $100,000 for "city off ioes. The committee felt that the most logical location for this new facility was the McKinney/Woodrow Lane area. It is suggested that this be built as close to the county's law enforcement center as possible. oe Holland NZM00743 LAW S iroac iMTIMS SMILt N ° Cost for court and offices (approx. 30000 sq.ft.) Finish out cost $65-$70 per sq.ft. c cost for police offices (approx. 21,500 sq.ft.; Finish out cost $60-$65 per sq.ft. ° Cost for new jail (approx. 30500 sq.ft.) Finish out cost $904105 per sq.ft. ° Renovation of old cell area (approxe 1,645 sq.ft.) Finish out cost $40-$45 per sq.ft. ° Renovation of entry Finish out cost $100000 to $15,000 ° Total cost for new building (approx. 28,000 sq.ft.) Minimum cost $1680 million Maximum cost $2000 maximum ° Total cost for renovation of old building minimum cost $1001000 Maximum cost $1100000 ° Land (10 acres at $50,000/ache) #5000000 o Parking lots (150) $1008000 o Estimated Total Package minimum cost $2.5 million maximum cost $2.7 million Pros Cons ° Cost savings from ° Land purchase womld be needed elimination of least ° Location needs to have dual space street exit/entrance o Provide space for immediate ° Parking is limited at the needs located close to the existing police station City Hall ° Renovation of the existing ° Previous renovation investment police station of police headquarters is ° More police office area secured and put to use may be needed KO~, ° Centralisation of police and o courts Nkm building can be 6esigned !or luture expansion of both Clio* and courts ° bljoves some traffic and people congestion at City Hall ° Have marketable to oitisens ° Leaves open the option of expanding City Stall or moving to another location ° Solves vehicle parking probles for polio* .a ATHLETIC FIELDS/NEIGHBORHOOD AND SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS " TV 01OtNT0Mi TEXAS CIyIb CMMr / 821 ILAft9f= / OwMWy TetN 7020! M E M O R A N D U M TO1 Hugh Ayer, Chairman, CIP Committee FROM$ Kathy Orr, Chairperson, CIP Sub Group DATES September 29, 1966 SUSJXCTs CIP Reeossssendation for Recreation Facilities Recreation facility expansion was discussed by our group and was felt to be an important part of this Capital Improvements Program. After a presentation by the Parks and Recreation staff detailing the overcrowding and lack of existing facilities, we brought in many athletic groups, neighborhood groups, and senior citizen organisations that echoed those same concerns. Our group decided to recommend three new centers due to the tremendous need for recreation facilities in our community. These would be 20,000 square feet facilities which would be built in the northeast, east, and southeast areas of town. We also recommend expanding the Senior Center by 10f000 square feet and developing additional parking and outdoor areas at that location. Athletic fields were also considered a priority, and our final recommendation and the tonal cost of these was increased from $1.2 million to $1.3 million to allow for one lighted soccer field at North Lakes Park. The rest of the development includes two new soccer fields at Dania and renovation of the softball fields at Dania. Five new soccer and four new lighted softball fields at North Lakes Park. Lighting four baseball and tw.) softball fields at Evers Park, modify the softball field to baseball, renovate field /7 and develop field $8 also at Evers. After such discussion and review, we would like to unanimously recommend the following facilities and year of considerations tHsnbn Mrka M►tl AseCrHtls~n / Onnbn, Tixsws I (017j ti0.0l~0 hy~ 2 lot Tiger East Community Canter $1.2 million "..67 Athletic Field Development .25 million $1.45 million 2nd Yg%r senior Center lspansion 4 .75 million IT--" Athletic Field Devielopment .35 million 41.10 million 3rd Year Community Center 41.3 million . SO-89 Athletic Field Development 2S million $1.35 million 4th Year Athletic field Development 4 .25 million '99-90 Land Acquisition (S acres) .25 million = .50 million 5t Year Community Center $104 million ~ Athletic Field Development .20 million $1.60 million 90-91 TOTAL $6.20 million This request is an increase of $650#000 from the origihil- W SS million suggested in the CIP recommendation. Our increases are as f0.1. lows s 1) Added $100,000 to the amount for athletic fields for lighting one soccer field at North Lakes Park. 2) Changes the original two center concept to three and increased thu funds for their construction (4300,000) from $3.6 million to $3,9 million due to inflationary adjustments during the five year period. 3) Added $250,000 for the purchase of land during the fourth year so that there will be a center site available when the third center is built in year five. The group is also concerned about the marketing of these issues and would be happy to assist the Council after a decision is made on what to include and when. RathXJUS HEM007 3 3 n r a SUMMY 1MYOMT100 SHUT Aec~ on C._., =_s Costs A1.2 million for lot year, $1.3 million for 3rd year, $1.4 million for 5th year $250,000 for land acquisition in the 4th year Sizes 20,000 sq.ft.. Locations Northeast Denton, Last Denton, Southeast Denton Descriptions Centers would include a gymnasium, multipurpose room, gamerooa, sooting rooms, offices, storage, and other areas as funds permit. Benefits of Recreation Center Expansion 0 Additional gymnasium space could permit expansion of athletic leagues, open play, and therapeutic recreation opportunities which will have a positive offset on revenues and participation. 0 Additional centers would provide greater service area. for community al Lowing sore individuals to have- greater' access to centers and programs. 0 Community education classes could be offered at centers allowing for expansion and continuity of scheduling. 0 Cultural, arts area could be incorporated into one of.the centers allowing for expansion in this program area. 0 Dance area could be incorporated into one of the centers allowing for expansion in this program area. 0 Additional space would allow for therapeutic recreation programming at canters which would evenly spread the program throughout the community. 0 Additional meeting room space would provide more opportunities for service organizations and clubs to utilize facilities. 0 Gymnastics room would enable growth in this program area and allow for creation of a team. 0 Additional multipurpose room space would allow for the expansion of neighborhood special events programs. 0 Additional multipurpose room space would allow for teen center and expansion of programming for this age group. 0 Additional classroom space would allow for the expansion of outdoor education classes in area in which we are currently deficient. 0 Additional multipurpose and classroom space would allow for the expansion of the pre-school program which currently operates at maximum. Beni. at Centel- Costs $7500000 sizes 100000 sq.fts expansion Location: Hell Avenue Descriptions The expansion would include a large multipurpose room, cafeteria style kitchen, gamoroom, arts/crafts room, sooting rooms, health services room, and offices. The cost will also allow for expanded parking and an enlarged patio. Benefits of Senior Captor Expansion G Could pro0 do work areas that could accommodate representatives from various social service agencies such as Social Socurity, Human Resources, RSVP, Legal Services, and Income Tax. o Allow the reading room to be expanded. o Provide large covered patio area for outdoor activities, breakfast program, and reading area. - - o Commercial kitchen could provide for rentals, special events, and lunch program additions. 0 Gym/fitness area could provide space for exercise, volleyball, self defense, walking, and dance programs. o Separate classrooms which could be used for adult classes and meetings only. o Area for cultural or craft programs such as ceramics, pottery, jewelry. o Increased storage availability. o Increased office space, current office space is extremely inadequate. O Additional meeting rooms could provide more space for club meetings, rentals, and departmental meetings. o Would provide more opportunities to tap the resources of the olderly by creating more opportunities for them to find new roles and to develop latent or new skills. o Provide better environment in which seniors will feel safe to test new ideas and behavior. o Would provide for the needs of the Domino Club. o A separate gameroom would provide for a tremendous amount of increased play which is interrupted now by many other activities and limited by other space needs. Athletic Fields costs $14 million Locations Evers Park, Donis Park, And North Lakes Park Descriptions Light and renovate fields at avers, develop softball and soccer fields at North Lakes, renovate softball fields and develop soccer fields at Denies 7 new soccer fields (1 lighted) 4 new lighted softball fields 2 new baseball fields Light 4 baseball, 2 football fields Bensfitjof Athletic Field Expansion o All youth and adult sports programs will be able to grow at least 50% with new and lighted fields. C All sports programs will have such more available practice time if this expansion takes place. At thi's time, areas for practice are' at a premium. o New alternative leagues can be started to get more individuals involved with our sports programming.. o All league play will be moved from neighborhood park fields so neighborhoods are. not bothered by noise, cars, and litter. r ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER/FIRE STATION/EQUIPMENT DOW"" WTY of WNTON MWON, rKUi 76001 October 6, 1986 Mr. Hugh Ayer C.I.P. Chairperson 425 Mimosa Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr. Ayers In order to provide fire and emergency medical service protection to the citizens of Denton and surrounding areas, I will address three (3) areas of consideration. The first is the present Capital Improvements Program which includes one (1) new fire sub-station at a cost of $450,000, hopefulAy thi3 station will be put in service in 1988, The second area is the upcoming capital Improvements Program which includes one (1) fire sub-station at a cost of $500,000 and a new pumper apparatus complete with eggipment at a cast of $200,000, The justifi, tion for the need of the new fire sub-stations and neces- sary apparatus and personnel has been provided in the recent packet, this justification is based on the recent study made by Public Technolo- gy, Inc. on station needs and site location. The two (2) site locations being Bonnie Brae and Windsor and Teasley and Lillian Miller Parkway. We plan to pout in service these two (2) stations in this manner. Complete and occupy the two (2) statione in 1988. Locate one (1) new station, new pumper apparatus, and twelve (12) new personnel at Bonnie Brae and Windsor. Locate one (1) new fire station at Teasley and Lillian Miller Parkway with one (1) pumper and twelve (12) personnel from Central Station. What this will do is put six (6) fire stations in operation with six (6) fire engine crews twenty-f..)ur (24) hours a day along with a complement of ambulance and aerial truck crews. The third area I want to mention is a need that will have to be ad- dressed very soon. ;'eep in mind that new apparatus has approximately fourteen (14) months delivery time from order date. A piece of appara- tus that will be needed soon is an aerial for each 35,j00 population or a fraction thereof. cur population is fast approaching the need for a second aerial apparatus since we already have one. This need is nit only for satisfying the State Boc-d of Insurance, but for the protection of lives and property. The prQsent aerial apparatus has a 75 foot Mr. Hugh Ayer October 6, 1986 Page 2 reach, the next one should be not less than 100 feet in order to reach a greater distance. The source information contained in this letter comes from several people, namely, Paul Reed, Acting Fire Chief; Jack Jarvis, Motor Pool Administrator; James Thomason, Emergency Medical Coordinator) and State Board of Insurance Rating Schedule. Attached -ou will find a time schedule that could be followed in order to accomp.Lish thesm needs. Mr. Hugh Ayer October 6, 1986 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION D'ENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE SUB-STATION ANO EQUIPMENT First Priority 1988-89 New Fire Sub-Station (1) $5000000 New Fire Apparatus (1) 2000000 TOTAL $7000000 Second Priority I998-89 Replacement Fire Apparatus (1} $200,000 From Operational Budget Replacement Ambulance (1) 50,000 From Operational Budget TOTAL 5250,000 Third Priority 1990-91 New Aerial Fire Truck (1) £400,000 TOTAL $400,000 NOTE] One (1) Fire Sub-station has already been approved for $450,000, Recommendation is that it be built in 1988-89. Mr. Hugh Ayer October 6, 1986 Page 4 FUNDING OF PROPOSED ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXPANSION The following information represents the total financial impact on the City for the proposed expansion of the Animal Control Center should Denton County and the Denton Humane Society choose not to participate in the expansion. New Facility Expansion $1939104 Existing Facil ty Improvements 9,000 Fencing and Aw•.,ngs 80000 Architectural and Engineering Fees 1510()0 Sub-total $225,104 Adoption Center Construction $ 60,000 TOTAL COST $285,104 City of Denton Contribution $185,104 Denton County Contribution 400000 Humana Society Contribution 60,000 TOTAL $285,104 The Denton Humane Society has been receptive to our proposal on the Adoption, Center construction and we feel that arrangements can be worked out to secure their involvement in this project, in addition, Denton County has included $40,000 in their 1986-87 budget for their contribu- tion to the Center expansion. Given the critical need ILr the Center expansion and the fact that the County has appropriated funding this fiscal year, it is the recommend4- tion of our sub-.:ommittee that this project be included in the first year of the plan. Additionally, we feel that it is essential the City include a minimum cf aIc5,104 in the plan for the expansion of th,n Center. M.". Hugh Ayer October 6, 1966 Page 5 Should you have any comment,e or questions on these matters, please let me know. sob Gorton C.T.P. Sub-Committee Chairman SG/sc pw3 DATE: 10/21/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell$ City Manager SUBJECTt PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE - Z-1834 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, SUMMARY: A request for a detailed plan on 3.2373 acres which is included in PD-6. The property is located on Colorado Boulevard northwest of Loop 288. BACKGROUND: The property is part of a retail section of PD-6 and the proposed retail center meets all requirements of the City of Denton. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUP13, AFFECTED: Five (5) property owners were notified. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact can be determined at this time. Respectfully submit d: Lloyd Har 11 Prepared by: City Man ger Cah-►~ r 0'-. Cecile Carson Urban Planner ,App ve Jeff Me Director of Planning and Development 03200 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1834 Meeting Date: October 21, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Paul Hastings 4435 LBJ, Suite 607 Dallas, Texas 75244 Status of Applicant: Architect Requested Action: Approval of a detailed plan and preliminary plat on a tract which is included in a planned development (PD-6). The property may be utilized for 37,850 square feet of retail and restaurant space. Location and Size: A 3.2373 acre parcel located on the northeast side of Colorado Boulevard northwest of Loop 288. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Light industrials vacant south - Planned development (PD-6) East - Planned development (PD-6) west - Planned development (PD-6) Denton Development Guide: High Intensity Area SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Colorado Boulevard is a primary major arterial, Driveways should have 40 feet of stacking room and be separated by 200 feet. The plans for the median cut and left turn lane on Colorado Boulevard must be approved with ~.he final plat. Utilities: An existing 8" water line along Colorado Boulevard has sufficient capacity and an existing 10" sanitary sewer along the railroad can be utilized. Electric service is available. , n .'.,tTMIAl'c .°er~ f 3 'Y S..'l: 7i,g"f. sr r(F] r.r ti.n.Y (Case 2-1834) Page TWO SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued) Drainage: Finished floor elevation must be provided. Final plat and engineering plans must address the storm sewer plan. A Swale over the culvert must be designed to handle the 100 year flood. HISTORY Planned Development-6 was approved in 1969. The planned development permits retail, multi-family and residential land uses. ANALYSIS The planned development permits retail land use, and this property abuts two retail establishments and the Golden Triangle Mall. The property is located in a high intensity area that encourages this type of land use. The project is scheduled to be completed in two phases. Michael's would be completed as Phase I in May, 1987 and the remaining retail space would be completed as Phase II in October, 1989, The preliminary plat conforms to all City of Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The detailed plan meets all requirements of the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance and Planned Development Ordinance. Staff would note that 9.7% of the property is proposed for landscaping for this project. The staff requests 20% land- scaping as a standard for all nonresidential areas; however, in this case a reduction may be considered acceptable. The adjacent tracts have little or no landscaping. This project includes landscaping around the buildings and in the parking lot which gives the appearance of more open space. RECOMMENDATION Plann,in and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1834. by a vo?e of 6-1. NOUN (Case Z-1834) Page Three ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Detailed Plan 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Development Schedule 5. Reply Form Total 6. Mailing List 7. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of September 10, 1986. 0275k 1 1: i ~ 00 / 10 op 1 00 10 I i i L l w- r • I~ F'D 55 ,Y LL r { r ITA J -A PD-6.1 1010 O f ~ 10 Y ~ /m7 00 PO 8 I PC) -49 PD F, 91 i U r - ~ pry.. SF~ 00 op~ IN /PC a/ kr- i -T- N" 1 MILYKq AMoof Sp FJMf Wd.pl ~)1'.w1I1~.,1(I~Y1(I. ~ ~ ~~•~"~"~}'1~}I'^I'~I'^~7~~ ~~~~`+j~p~~,~.~{~ / ~ ` I • ' ' , ~1 1 1 1 1 ' ! 1 1 I 1 { ( LJ ~..w.. I I fY. I , ry Hoe ZOWO rod 'r•.~• .qty IL t •run.• u•w.q~, ZP'~EG ~•G d ' . 1'rlrhwl ~ w"y ~ RyaQ~ ~ •y, 1? •1.ArNOI.w .Hw (111LL Me" {MM VW M^) DETAIL PLAN' 1 /KAN'fY AM• OMIIdIr~010CM1RIMIDI~/JOIMf YfNNM 1 ! / ~ • ~1 ~ • LAND MA-IMAM at FAA &n rw MO MM KW. ARG W._ . I6A00 W om M V200 a! RITAIL LUK AREA _ _ ._te !64 E6 cm at I/l00 af. RBOMMAW LiA$t AMA._....3AW ; ECM ut MOO LL . 1"► ~~M »•4~ V~ AM go$ ft" fm IM" y pb,S F, D I.- a a J Z. ~P3lt,r . mpg r "MM OMT I! on" 11 W MRMI OF A 4.[1[1 ACM 1MAp siflafm~ N J. r MAI AM A PAfMM 7 "Vitt N M MSfRllfO iN OIt MiRfA/ Mj 4OLAftnW? 10e 1M, AM• 1111 went=" OF nftld c0ON1, T/1p, MOM AIMMtA/ MN1N{ M f~1 0, N11i//I, 10010. Ali !MM MM[ fAMT100,A1L[ 0,010 M NTp M IV" AM fOLL"I I/IMIW 0At M 40 WAS1f0L1 COMM 0► L•T 1, I OF M IM" fMMfrOi, Al AMIfIM M M CI" OF OO4fO1, MOM COMM, YOM, At MPS M M IAAf MOM I OOM 0 COMO 'Y', F•I/ M0 JUNE A T9 y w~ ~ 40 M NIP RICCR/ 10 OMm C.OIIfV, TWO 4AM MM U110 IM M onrMf lttW.WMAT LIP! 01 1110 '.A:iiiiw.irAi XA J M1401MI, AAMM [ +eRA/ M11YN (A, A.O f. R.M. )1 t1A/ ro A''/ s-N AL 14r roe K1f r< IIeI, 11e IfM1r►f LIN OF SAIi IAffA1 AMI110Y, A 01STAIf/ d ri.M FlA[T ~ . A." WA L "W" UW N Ir W CW AM CoNf 11110% ALOM M NMgOLT Llle r> SAM IAMAT AWTICK A MttA/ff OF !1.11 [II, to A IVA.^ NuL to tLMO/I J loft RA/R4MN • MM[Y ,OIAA 01A 1S' WV AM f%U*"M M PAfMMV LMf tIF LM 1~ [0411011, A DO f1AW OF 114.11 fm to A'7. A." 01 Ft* u0m, It' OM' Y/11 JIO M 01001111[ LIPf d SAID tN14[O 4IDft101. A DI LiiUy 01 1•.11 lltt 1 •/AM 4/y' AMTIO • I f0A ^f.%.' MIL 10 CORff IM PON IMMkf Rf011f.410 MW LIN OF CtRAM10 I0L[VAO (A IN./ AM RIbM- 1 ' ! ♦ d-40), APf M 0SM OM OF A OAW m Me lt" fILN11M A C!•AAL Mau IV IY fir Clv AO A woo v fmi "amp *o* pow m 1 111110, AMf1 ALAIM MM OMM b M LM A 0141Ap OF 4".N 1KT fO A A510 fall .'dRMR IN "f yyDWidf 4 wom, R 01 fPR1 •1'\~ ! ` A L M OW 01 rW CA/'Tf W #Mlf)Oh M[ Arifra 00 M CIn t1 MINIM, DMM011 UL1I/, 111:1110111 A[C~II{ f0 ♦ PA41 Mmom PftOR10 w ov -so, PM "I or we 1/11 R[CMOS OF Dora t.0•NT, cowl r 4w.IRA4I 111114 I 11M(/ 1fMM,N Is' Wt AR PUAO MM M S0110"MMILT LIN[ Y SLID CMP" -W 00Mf1011, A OIsfA1Q X11 L. K ~1e N, "on 400 M.0 y \ r IF OM.SO PVT fe A POW R11 UMfO ON M YOMSAIO %IMVMt tIW-0P40Y LM/ CIF M MOO.$ V R.R., yFP `I Fy/y ...r.+wf +.r.wr scum tie " at. fA0/ Ali 1pLL(1N/M MM ,fstALr 16 11111I A<rr ff IJ SAID M.[.! 1. R.A. A OHiMM/ ♦ ~ ~ " • `r • r.~«I«'i +.~r.N r.11 uV 111.a rar FO nt rw1 a wul+lls AM [aPrAMala IrK% Is I.w. \ Fr LAW y ACOtf ! 4M I aR/R I • ~ ♦ ~ Nlr nefAOlf ral 11eM ifA Mflr PAelres: I ` f~ N.Y.• . f'1~M~Pl,wfw~ t ' MtMRI' ANIfIM tf•f A~1 YpItuft r10[S 40[M AMM MIS PUS. O/S110M11N ♦ • • y~ frww .rw IIf• rw e.rMf'r AARf MOO I 4y~ YW,N,,, 1,L, ~t 4~ M 0 O0 SCiI M1 !r' /Nf LS A[O11119 , ON Amlf,y 1 fN CIIV 9NROM. ♦ • 'f itAAR, M P41111111 OIfItAf! ro M NMLIC USE Ip1eKA, ry 4[11[[15 Ali 1A~1 Wool "MOM. .~_:.__ltl _1_~. pf ~•-`~jA AMM r.. fi Arr 4 % 11I! LA0 A Awl NOr11T 0. lrtaRW, KAIIAM 11 8 1 6 10 110 SIAr[ 7 tvw a Y 'Y M {YIS[! - « 1R•l. 001NM (00111 OF OM/IOI r (A sss q wOl 111 ~H~_.•__•.•.•- Z1APR •f, M UpA51Ul01pIAA1 P51LIC IN P/i 1tlA CpJIIV, q r*, ]I MIS DAY P[R50N1l LT 4ATGM[0 t_ Q R1111TLM10 _ Una Io rf fo X tie of" ~ NAN 2---._~ry- is 4MC IIfD~it !NA IM N'b [I(AA[P(A fo q 1011 tl(t CTCCVfro M SAC PfM me KAPW A LOO109PU1rOf INWIN fOMSSM AO IN M WACIf1 MMIN, 01N11 VO[ll IN NNp AIO wx (It off ICS Mt, - M4 V o ..11..11 4R+raw' ~ ~ • 411,111'11 CRM1101CM11 ANN MY 101 M TWU Me UPON r1Mt• 11 mvio 41TAQ, W41itym F11LIC "KtINA, Do 100 IN CfPfltr MAf 1 *0WI) M'S Mt Pie 40 /IROR f RUN Wo ACSL,AL A• 4CCIIAII VAWV OF Iff L410, 40 •4%f M IOMTe rp0S %bQW M"VVw AM "M ,ADAM 'R/A/•R 1M1,LIIMA• AIMTfM ` NT MM,OwA 1.•t0v151f1 IN ACCoftwo wIM M CIADINAUs'A ht rltT M Jow( 1. COMMTARM 10 1 \ ]Avl Kt 4 slip 7 IC I vw;r,rT V. Nflr PRELIMINARY PLAT `4°A GOLDEN TRIANGLE / WCHAEL'S ADDITION UN S AN MWTION ro THE Wy OF 00CM tN:NTdI COl~N1'Y/ 1'tX/ti SA10"m a" of mm 09fta": MUSS ft ti 070 00111110" IMAM am MMAM ~If I ~ R1016C 5111/1 -0011 M101K:7lIMt+lf•O1l1 h /w . 1*40 REV S HASTINOS & 7MMO DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE GOLDEN TRIANGLE/MICHAEL'S September 15. 1966 Oats Description 8/12/86 Submit Detailed Plan, and Preliminary Plat to the City Wait one week 8/19/86 Meet with Development Review Committee Revise drawings as required 8/21/86 Resubmit before 10 am 8/26/86 Most with Development Review Committee 8/26/86 Apply for P 3 a' detailed Plan and Preliminary Plat Appoval Minimum 2 weeks prior to the meeting 8/27/86 Start Construction Documents three weeks 9/10/86 P d Z meeting Apply far City Council Hearing 9/25/86 Submit plans for Building Permit for Phase I Five weeks checking time 10/3/86 Apply for P d Z Final Plat d Engineering Plans Approval Minimum 3 weeks prior to the meeting 10/14/66 DRC review of Final Plat and Engineering Plans 10/16/86 Revised plans due by 10 am 10/21/96 ORC review of Final Plat and Engineering Plans 10/21/86 City Council Hearing for Preliminary Plat d Detailed Plan Approval Prepare Construction Documents for Kew 1 10/29/66 P b Z meeting approval of Final Plat and Engineering Plans One Day 10/30/86 File Final Plat b Obtain Building Permit One Day 11/1/86 Start construction on Phase I Fifteen weeks construction time 2/13/87 Michael's Is Substantially Complete Ten and a half weeks 5/1/87 Michael's opens This project is part of PO-6. Projected traffic generation for this project Is estimated at 650 trips times 3.2373 acres or 2,104 trips. It is our belief that this proposed project Is In compliance with the Oentnn Development Guide and the requirements of PD-6. The Owner's intent upon City approval is to build the i8pOW sf. Michael's store immediately. The attached 19,850 retail/restaurant shell space Is currently planned to be ready for occupancy in October .3f 1989. The future retell market and economic conditions will ultimately determine the exact schedule for Phase II construction. Construction Documents for the Phase 11 sitework will be completed concurrently with Phase i Construction Documents. i PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1934 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received 7 ~ S 1A a tt C C/O 6ownL hill -r-r n A A J% Pa S s~ Pd r 1c 0 Ilia 9, 17 7P ~ r . moon • I P i Z minutes September 10, 1986 Page 4 Is a collector street with 60 feet of right-of-way and perimeter street paving is required. She said that an existing 11 Inch waterline on Mayhili Road at Edwards Road must be extended 4,100 feet east to this site. She added that ah 18 to 21 inch sanitary sewer several hundred feet to the west will provide adequate service when extended. minedaduringtplattingoprocess, rSheisaidathat staff recoe- • mends approval of Z-1817. REBUTTAL: None offered. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. fiscue moved to recommend approval of Z-1817. seconded by Ms. Cole. ' Mr. Claiborne said that he encouraged the developer to pre- serve some of the nature on this property. Ms. Brock asked about the Impact on Mayhill Road when this site develops, Ms. Carson stated that the developers of Southern Hills will improve Mayhill Road including rerout- ing Mayhill Road and doing new construction of the entire road that runs basically from railroad tracts to State School Interchange. She said that the small portion not improved will be improved as soon as developmont occurs or if Incorporated into the Capital Improvement Program. She said that the plat has been approved for road construction of Southern Hills and that they are now working on a speci- fic use permit for a batch plant to begin construction. Vote was called and motion unanimously carried (7-0). B. 'Z- 1834. Petition of Paul Hastings, representing Golden T'rionale Joint Ventu.e, requbstinp approval of a detailed plan, including the preliminary plat of the Golden Triangle/Michael's Addition, on a 3.2373 acre tract which is a part of an existing planned development (PD-6). The property 1: located on Colorado Boulevard northwest of Loop 288 and shown In the J. S. Taft Survey No. 1256. If approved, the ropperty may be utilized for 37,550 square feet of relall and restaurant space. Five notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; no reply forms were received In favor or opposition. PETITIONER: Paul Hastings, architect, stated that he was ova a e--for questions. Mr. Holt asked about the land use on the property. Mr. Hastings stated tho.t the project would develop in two phases. He said that the first phase Is an 18,000 square foot Michael's store and the second phase is 19,850 square feet of retail/restaurant lease space. He said that the Michael's store Is scheduled to open in May of 1987 and Phase Il is scheduled for October of 1989 dependent upon marketing conditions. IN FAVOR: None present, OPPOSED: None present. STAFF KEPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the planned devel- opment permits retail land use, and this property abuts two retail establishments and the Golden Triangle Mall. The property is located in a high intensity area that encourages this type of land use. The preliminary plat conforms to all City of Denton Subdivision and Land Ds- vo lopment kegulations. She added that the datafled plan I t 4'i6UZiks September 10, 1906 Page 5 meets all requirements of the City of Denton Zoning OrdJ- nance and Planned Developpment Ordinance. She said that staff would note that 9.71 of the property is proposed for • landscaping for this project while staff recommends 201 landscaping as a standard for all nonresidential areas. However, in this case a reduction may be considered accept- able, because the ad) acent tracts have little or no land- scaping. She said that this project includes landscaping around the buildings and in the parking lot which gives the appearance of more open space. She said that staff recommends approval of Z-1834 REBUTTAL: Mr. Hastings asked that the Commission -pprove the detailed plan and preliminary plat. Mr. Claiborne asked if he had dealt with landscaping requirements in other cities. Mr. Hastings stated that the Citr of Dallas has a landscaping ordinance that is very difficult to understand and he has no specifics or requirements in other cities. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of Z-1834. Seconded by Mr. Escue. Mr, Holt stated chat he went to Port Collins, Colorado over his vacation. He said that this city has an 18 to 201 landscapin requirement. He said that everything has landscapping and it Is beautiful, He said that it is un- bellevable how important we feel about our city ■nd how it looks. He said that he had no problem with the property grid plans. He said that the Conolssion should consider these kind of plans and let people know that the City is going to reqquire landscaping and it will pay off in the long run. lie said that there is no reason why Denton can not be like Port Collins. He said that the city should act quickly on establishing an ordinance. Vote was called and motion carried (6.1). Mr. Holt voted no- C. Z-1835. Petition of Burke Engineering, representing 9TTI- oberds, requesting a change In zoning from the agricultural (A) to the planned development district and approval of a concept pplan on a 58,662 acre tract located west of North Locust (NM 2164) and northwest of Hercules Lane. the property is more fully described in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract 1288, If approved, the planned development would permit the following land uses: General Retail - 2.84 acres Multi-Family - 11.00 acres, 190 total utiits, with a density of 17.3 units per acre Garden/Townhouse - 7.20 aces, 74 total units, with a density of 10,3 units per acre Sin it Family-7 - 18.50 acres, 76 total units, wfth a density of 4.1 units per acre Greenbelt - 19.12 acres Eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposition. PETITIONER: Brian Burke, Burke Engineering representing gill Aoberds, stated that theyy have been before the Com- mission and are back with modifications. He said that they have had igoetings with Ms. Carson, Mel Lac uement, with MUSTstafpf report, Heasaidethatdtheyahave provided adequate transition and feel it is consistent with zoning 1614L NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A DETAILED PLAN FOR A PORTION OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-3S9 AS SAID DETAILED PLAN APPLIES TO 3.2 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON COLORADO BOULEVARD, NORTHWEST OF HIGHWAY LOOP 2881 AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That for the 3.2 acres of land, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, being part of the planned development established by Ordinance No. 69-3S, there is hereby approved, in accordance with the provisions of Article 11 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, a detailed plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, so that hereafter said land shall be used and developed in accordance with the detailed plan herein approved. SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance No. 69-35, showing the detailed plan herein a~,,nroved. Any provision of ordinance 69-35 which conflicts with the provisions of this ordinance or the detailed plan adopted herein is hereby repealed. SECTION III. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sun not exceeding One Thousand Pollars ($1,000.00); and each day and every day that the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in addition to and cumulative of, any other remedies as may be available at law and equity. SECTION Iv. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is Z-1834/PAGE 1 hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986. RAY STEPHENSp MAY W CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE AELER, CITY SECRETX17 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: Z-1834/PAGE 2 EXHIBIT "A" G01 TRIANG LE 1 L' TRACT BEING 3.2373 ACRES SITUATED IN THE J.S. TAFT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 12560 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND A PORTION OF TRACT 4 AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 986, PAGE 913, DEED RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM GIBRALTAR SAVINGS TO HERBERT D. WEITZMAN.. TRUSTEE, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND 80UND$ AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 10 BLOCK 1 OF THE TARGET ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DEMON, DENTON COMITY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN CABINET "B", PAGE 263 OF THE MAP RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; SAID POINT BEING IN THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE MISSOURI, KANSAS, 6 TEXAS RAILROIAD (M.K.6 T. R.R.); THENCE SOUTH 470 55' WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TARGET ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 76.0 FEET TO A "P.K." NAIL FOR CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 190 36' EAST AND CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TARGET ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 31.39 FEET TO A "P.K." NAIL FOR CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 470 55' WEST AND FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TARGET ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 314.12 FEET TO A "P.K." NAIL FOR CORNER; THENCE NORTH 890 28' 04" WEST AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TARGET ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 56,67 FEET TO A "P.K," NAIL FOR CORNER IN THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COLORADO BOULEVARD (A 100.0 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY), AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL P;GLE OF 38' 22' 01" AW) A RADIUS OF 700.0 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT A DISTANCE OF 432.09 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE C.QrET MoAx ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN CABINET "D", PAGE 221 OF THE MAP RECORDS OF DEHITON COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE NORTH 47° 55' EAST AND FOLLOWING THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID CARPET MAX ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 264.56 FEET TO A POINT FOR CORNER IN THE AFORESAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE M.K. 6 T. R.R.; THENCE SOUTH 420 05' EAST AND FOLLOWING THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID M.K. 6 T. R.R. A DISTMN;E OF 395.0 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 3.2373 ACRES OF LAND. Z-1834 s.~r f EXHIBIT DETAILED PLAN OF GOLDEN TRIANGLE/MICHAEL'S, CONSISTING OFs 1. Detailed Site Plan and Preiiminary Plat (2 pages); and 2. Development Schedule (1 page). Z-1834 7 '1 Ml 1dNe4 po 1 ~ f~ . ZOMM Mr. ! !1 v 7Mi ~ ~ . -err ~ { INk .v \ ¢ ..1N IwM .LM - .I I ~ y '___~1 _ ~ h ems' ~ ~ • .1...,, ~ ~ -c~----mow R y. y, ~ II ` ~ • fKµL h ` ~l DETAIL PLAN 3' • r11Wrr .I.w (Mµ OwrW 411M w.r rsn.~ ONMERI OOIDftN 1flw~NOlf/JdNf VENTURE ~ ~ . ~ J ~ '"C~ Frpp }1=r LANG AREA _ t_ » AcREa _.11i,011at FAR in ~l IANDSCAP11M0 0.7Yaf N!.1rw i3 r!; MICHAELS KW. AREA 19)00 ~ ° `ra~ 90 aan at UIW RETAIL LEAN AREA_.._.._IAW $6 an at 1/200 Lc RESTAURANT LtASEAREA __VW an 560 206 RICD YwWVMrfi •'~r•~• ra,r~wr 207 SHOWN r" "4'►..wa,+w ~t is r. ~ . 1tMI d /qw ` La1fNr aY aeon mow' 11 )fes4 7 . I.)I)I .[1f 'MR 1 IiT1e4t® ~ijil'f{~, 'rlN~i~If. RW. MO 4 nN1Mw IF roil K DRftllfau IM .1I~ 4RJM •ASt 511, An orc'm v :CAM ::MIRY, tt W, 'tl1 41"Ift"A 1W0is tt '1AIMI )litO10k ISOM, M t1L• 1OM AYr(ICIaA)tI Dllt fW M fRf 40 imam As IRauil "&I M At fte 4m`"""fRT Co' M s'Of I, SM 1 Y !N "AM +0010[0., 10 4WITI06 M 11A 41" Y AM101, DC,101 ;6IIl, 'RAM, AttOMYM 10 M MS 'I/ACW 41C'aw,D .171 ri101N11 IV. M14 161 dr M MI W,3011 )1 awm =oon. few, "W off M14i 1N .K ist"Lf flowI w•a" L;rt 40 tSSMI" KANSAS S TEXAS MIAMI *$111" , CIS" 4 M" "ILA" a.L.l 1. A. u, r>•Q A" W ■sl %as M •w,/ tv trK Y LAM fWXt AMINO, A J111WI Y •1. A A11': 1 - - TO A MIL " :700, fIMtI An" Lr rA' tw *0 Z wI%w(%6 Vi► M KtNt►f .1K Y Lrl) fAOLt As01TI(SI, A DISTWA W am SWOO1 . SWAY Y )Lit M7 t0 A IV R.- 4a16 "A ;J"A; ' ~ ,t,Ll f, IAI♦N14r Mme.-+_.-~+ rot! '.`.4M %I- 1 !11 W to Y'-4 'St MN tr .ill 1 silo I.yf[T 4oiit,wo A ]ISILII Y 114. 11 'sft 70 A Mll '(A 1400, ~~-4..~..~ I '~I P«! 'QM I{A it, fSt LO 'OFCILI .[;.+wrSAID 'MI.R '001,1 T. 1 Ai'V[S A 16.0 ntt *vmw 1Cttau: 10 A'Y.A.^ WIL •y :4rM A114 US"Af r rAt W• UMaM I I r 4 I :fL 4011 I.Aii.IY "A .;).)'Mt 414-1, + 4 rur.M' Of+MrI, Wet 7K1+4MK At 4 '-'&A A ,t •o /IS 1NI1t . 'naw 4e4A Y 111 :1• Ir' r0 , L•1U1 r r-•rn'f •w IC t I I sk9~ lr.. ANT, 'N' • N&41"M L114 CWQ TO M LtM 4 )$%1,011 W .17. M R[t 4 MrW „y :WMA !M M dWnW.17 r!0L1 _ S a) I LIK'Y TV CART 4W AITIOM, M AyirrIM 11 %C n Y I!t 1, e1ly. "AMT , '!t?7 4L: sMIAG a..w 4ar 1I! N I I j r% 14 AM Tho"M !Cane'N UAWT'7", ti/ n1 0 M W iGt An f ""A .lM~. , V 4N II 1M~'~r r I 4 I 40?" W W WIT *0 lra L'Mft ,M .-'!v A ..OIT, ~I , A >IS pip 1 •IOQK I'.. ! j ~A r "M r1.'. A •tn TO A ~»1N► "w ,eta rLM 1rru isriN ; Ir ~t~ r i,r ~t'e +t ..R,. I.. 4.. Blau Nr 1 • 1T I a......r. 4.1.00 4•'1tl M .}1 1f• T IY r)IL~.wN ~ 71 Y.M, ..V Y ~ 1D I 4 • 4.4. A JIs,*" s ^ • I MA ' 101I"1 IO D! Aj" 71 kWo"W M t7IMxIK r ~t•f ..-CS Y ..r0. ~i4 = tiL♦ [~+Gj• a w...+. ~wL. r.r r1n LAO ti % w ~ • ~-•--•1,` 'ir i 7 1 ar i ueA 1 •ol r•ar/Or ear r.E1s we w "TIM wevelm. 1I61 •r44 V.M 1 wr +..trr ! I.MI rMANtlty,QOI► Nir1_IR VIS tAtar 'CY)Ir 'rtS A'.Lr. x:l.1T'rl. N 414. aw I+Arr r1...4r♦ a ` 4T1.AA, I~ lr,P I+rri►•Y ON i4» M. INk 0® Y/'fA. As ' •414M.1. i•'M M of IJ1'~ ;:fT Y %1I r T, ` , ; mow, •1w . ; TCM. *0 b "Win ASICA11 10 M AkA/t M °)*I", It r3urls NC !As"""s ~'"*Co. 1,4.0•_ • ~ a0e► 1w.4 ~ ; ~ reAau r.♦ A- AL .L, 1aa WPM q, 'K -O¢01t N0.WMV OALIC 14 Ve .7Mti, •T•4LS, A ^•1S ;)r '1S51MLLt 1M WDI V4111 D t 't Kh.11 ~Ifiit YVM 'of •r-...-.-~ mot- L ir1e '4I ~ a1'i ~C Ai L`(Mt~ 'wl ^!1 !.f_'M '1f iJA Eev "t ^'L'• 4a.AMt *0 :74 tOW441 144 .rrC414 L MD. w T'V !4AW, '.fwtr1 . w J., WML Raw yr o" ArO I4.IL .Y sAIL1 -+x - At Y . U4. ,O IN Am -w ~ +A,eTOll-s mnlrlun rA♦ trwf. 11 W10 r[•Hl, I/OII-r M 1iL1: Ao 40t)f '!aril- '•M} 1414tJ ^•1, L11 'ql W auto Aa.$ ACT'.AL WD 2:.4rt iJ.tT It 44-40, 40 '+.i If W-7 •#OS M •t1: H 1At -.WED _W* • 104.11N 'NAMRI' .INfM ` 41P !CA S71N Ylr1vl51a '.V A:C01400" 11'Sr y Aw Avst(s 'S 'f ':_t Y .CI17A. PRELIMINARY PLAT GOLDEN TRIANGLE/MICHAEL'S ADDITION i;, « * OEM AN A001T1ON TO THE M" Cf DEMON ' OENTCII OOIJMTY, MAN REVISED f ko%T R' o" of," ,M MAIL": ~ I.W1ell CA ' WMIS Ca011'rUM M AM am IAYAN 111 it Od4WrTY11AI nW* XL6A$.rt,w "fit "lot IWIM-UT, A,Vd ti41`wwo as HASTINGS & TREVL .O DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE GOLDEN TRIANGLE/MICHAEL'S August 20, 1986 Date Description 8/12/86 Submit Detailed Plan, and Preliminary Plat to the city Wait one week 8/19/86 Meet with Development Review Committee Revise drawings as required 8/21/86 Resubmit before 10 am 8/26/86 Meet with Development Review Committee 8/1,6/86 Apply for P d Z detailed Plan d Preliminary Plat Approval. Minimum 2 weeks prior to the meeting 8/27/86 Start Construction Documents three weeks 9/10/86 P b Z meeting Apply for City Council Hearing 9/16/86 Submit plans for Building Permit for Phase I Five weeks checking time 10/1/86 Apply for P d Z Final Plat " Engineering Plans Approval. Minimum 3 weeks prior to the meeting 10/21/86 City Council Hearing for Preliminar-, Plat and Detailed Plan Approval Frepare Construction Documents for Phase 1 10/22/86 P 6 Z meeting approval of Final Plat d Engineering Plans One day 10/23/86 File Final Plat d Obtain Building Permit One day 10/24/86 Start construction on Phase I Sixteen weeks construction time 2/13/87 Michael's Is Substantially Complete Ten and a half weeks 5/1/87 Michael's opens This Project is part of PD-6. Projected tr6ffic generation for this project is estimated at 650 trips times 3,2373 acres or 2,104 grips. It Is our belief that this proposed project is in compliance with the Denton Development Gulde and the requirements of PD-6. The Owner's intent upon City approval is to build the 18,000 sf. Michael's store Immediately. The attached retail/restaurant 311811 space is currently planned to be ready for occupancy in October of 1989. The future retail market and economic conditions will ultimately determine the exact scheaule for Phase II construction. Construction Documents for the Phase It sitework will be completed concurrently with Phase I Construction Documents. NL' . S •~y1yY drat.;! AN. OAQINANtt AMENDIN# TMt tONti~r~ ` y ` f[llAi At SAK R'AS ADOPTED AS Alt AP t ORDIN CES Of THE CITY Of DENT _ ~ XA>1: i1' daAOII1ANCt NQ 6P•1► ANb AS SAID MAP APPIit T4►CNTAIN PA r~, CITY LOTS 11 AND 1 OiN01g1 A 4 Of City BLOCK t8JCITY AND CITY LO B13CITY L K S ' t 7 iO IY P CIT Ts NTY 1 #c Tt SHOWN S ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP Of THr CITY OtNTON DINT610 6E0. TEXAS. AND MORE PARTICULAALV DCSCAtl 0 HEREIN; AND OCCLARINO AN EFFECTtYt PLAT INCilIIPOr~ATt~ Tlj. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEl1AS, NLROY OADAtNit That the Zoning Map of the Cfp ad January 140 1969, as an AppendYxr'ot Dept oA~ Toxes adept: Of the City of Dentono Texas, undh, to 104, Code a*Orr~tne«ees. ance NO. 69-1, boo an the the Rrevisions of s4aM is-Ae,,•~ OrdtN: All the hereinafter described 1~ amended°a1 followpt. 4 property • to from the "A" A Mri►y~rwe~ref •'";.gricultural District at 1hewn ' Maos and all so sefd Zom11160.. a., provisions of Ordinance NO'; d10-1 adopted the, 14th day of January, 1969, as 1Mended'' to said property as "PD" ' shall htreel'tar apply , Planned Development District 4ccordln9 to, and subject to ► the below conditions and ri- quireaonts, and to the plat attached hereto and Made a part hereof for all Purposes $ and being 9enerallr described as all that certain lot, treat or parcel 6f land situated to the City and County of Dentofr°o Tax&$' known as City Lots 11 and 12 Ot City Black 286; City Lots 1 2 3 and 4 of City block 283 and city Lot 13 of City V ock 21610 as shown this date 'Go the Official Tax Map of the City of Denton, Tex,,s► and being. the slime property described in the attached plat (located in the 1100 11ock of 011142 Drive), which conditions and regvir,i., Monts are as follows; to No building or other structure shall aeestructed on or across existing tut lines shown on the attached plot and on future raplats; nor be closer them the front, side and rear yard requirement stated in the 20"log Ordinance. The ♦t~ • ' • JL i .4 V f . Or~jst+Mn tt~ta' a11r shM►•~~~t1E . •ri' ~1E o►: f aa~, iMielr• 'stt>w . ~ di 7 a• tires wiOfa tole ettaehod Plat. 04 'tot lines shall be chsng•e only by r* Subdividing of replatOot in the Oanner pro sided by the Subdtvtsion Re9als- tionso to Article 13,03 of Appendix A to the Cede of Ordin- aaCee. 3. When a tract or parcel of land it ressNivided or replotted- any and all additional rights of ray and easements which ore deemed necessary by the plsssing sod losing Con- 41{sibs shall be dedicated by the person rossbdiridfng or re• ptatti•g the land the saw as it the tract or parcel were be. Jet originally subdivid*4. 4. Each lot or tr ,t shown orgy the attacked Plot Shall be Hilted to one structure only regarAials of the ss*'indiest- ed in the plate until tone is further platted within the de- 1lseat*d areas shown on the attached Plato oad each such plot shall show all proposed building sit*$# building set back tines from each street and abutting property* all Ottlitys streetp alley and access rights of wale and drainage wars# upon the dedication to the City of all needad streets- alley kart or sassments to serve sent and upon the completion of the paving of all streets abutting such propertys and needed to into access therotoo as ■ay be required by the Planning and Zoning Commissiono such plat shall be filed of record slang with tho general plat attached hereto upon Its approval by the plasreing and Zoning eommi!tsien. 101dinq permits will only be issued for these area% shown on the detailed plat as building areas within the set back lines. 5. When a tract or parcel of !asst is ressbdivided or platted as described In the paragrepb above, say and all addi- ti*nal rights of way and tssewoots roeuir*d or 6*0"d necessary by the Planning and zoning Commission shall be dedicated by the NpNm ►espldlirfliy or piattt r' Portal- M*rq ►~fisg ortgfnally iV►dlrfdod.• i r r -A l provfOrns of Ordlnamce t or Ordfm• . aneo) of the City of Denton shall apply to the property O thlm the attached neat to permit the 206189 uses Indicated thereon, by shadfn9 or otherwise, and no other restrictfons than these found for each such use district shall apply, nor shall any other use than those permitted by the respective roping dfst• riot be permitted within the areas so desf9nated on the attach. ed plate and the zoning district areas to doffned shall not be Changed except by amendment of this ordinance. N platting or replotting of any area shall not affect the uses permitted within the respective districts shown on the attached plat, r All the streets, easements, alleys and rights of ray tndieated on the attached plat have been properly dedicated, or are now hereby dedfcoted, to the City of Denton, 4114 the sane are hereby accepted by sold City for public purposes. 8. All streets shall be paved as required by the Planning and Porting Commission prior to the issuance of any building permit, and all paving shall be done according to the spacffi. cations on file to the office of Community Development, and under its direct inspection and supervision, The paving width within the desfgnatod street rights of way shall be as requfr• ad by the Director of Community Development, provided that the usual standards for seas be followed. 9, All ordinances of the City of Denton and laws of the state of toxaa shall be compiled with, and all regulations ro. Harding the subdividing of property ore hereby expressly made applicable hereto, 10. No buildf6g permit or certificate of occupancy will be Issued until the pertinent conditions stated herein have boom comptfed with. , to c it. th following building and use rest ctioes shall $poly to 011 tats designated fop 111"ls feifly resideAtlet also o-ly 00 the attached plat, and same shell be 10C1u4e4 as 4ea4 restrictions on such lots. alo"g with any others isrosed by the developer consistant with the intent hereof, and with all applicable laws and ordinances; provided that the following restrictions are deemed minimal only, and any greater restri- ction imposed by the developer shall prevail; to wit: a. All lots I'. the "single family" designated area within the attached plat shall be used for single family residehtia'r purposes only, constructed upon concrete foundations, with single garages or carports attached, and necesseey outbOi drags for single family use only; provided, however, that double or triple garages may be detached from the residence but shall not be closer than 100 foot to th'e front lot line; b. No residential structure shalt be erected or plated on any of the lots in such residential area having less than 1200 square feet of floor space. exclusive of garage and porches, c. No buildfng shall be iocated nearer than eight feet to any side lot line nor nearer than thirty five foot from the front property line, nor roarer than 15 feet to any side street line; d. No trade, business or commercial activity shalt be carried on or lucated upon any lot in such designated area, nor shall anything be done thereon which may become An annoyance or nuisance to other residents in the save a !a, e. Water and sewerage connections shal be made it tr,e property tine, f, No chickens, turkeys or other fowls, cow, cattle, hog or hogs, horse, or horses, or soy other live1,t0cx of Arty Class- ification shall ever be kept or permitted on any lot or lots in such area, q, No trailer or temporary structure s` I ever be placed upon any lot in such area or used as a reside: ,s ~n such arcs, h. These rove" ants are to run wfth the ,rs and ,ha~1 be binding on tho area lot owners, their suc~os, ,e Moir heirs executors, admfei~trators and assigns fora -cod of ten years from September 23, 1969s continuing until Se! "ter 2i, 1979, inclusive, at w~irr, time such covenants shel' a autor.atlcally extended for sucr1~110ve periods; of ten vears less b/ a vote of the majority cf the then owners of the des ^Ated lots, it is agreed t;► Change said covenants In whole c In flart, i, if any r„ner of a lot or lots in sail designated area, or their heirs or aW Ins shall violate or at -pt tr notate any of the covon.ints or restrictions herein c -tained, then it shall be lawful 'or say ether yarvon owning r - s! prope•tr in said designated area, to prosecute any procee; ngs, io law or in tQuity, agatn;t such vi*lators ar attempted v+alators of said covenants, a:1 to either orevent h41► or them from to doing, or to recover for such viollttans. lnval.d w C n of any 0 these caveman.. by ;udgrent or court order, %4.fi! tr. nowise arfatt any other ;ro:isio,is 'ereof, which shall ro%atn :r full farce and effect. •31~ <_L The Owner ano/or develow 0 the laof dasertb" is the attacked plats for and In ceasiderstion of the trantiay by the city Council of this zoning classification on the sofa propt•rty, does hereby bind itself, its successorst executors, adiilnis- traturs and assl4ns to fully comply with Ili of the above des- cribed terms and conditions for tPe use of said land as long as this ordinance shall remain in effect, and the sold developer and/or owner understands that without full and complete comoll- ance on his port vith the said terms and conditions the uses permitted herein and hereby would otherwise be prohibited under the coning Ordinance of the City of Denton, and in order to secure this amendment to the Zoning Map to matt such use of the aforesaid land, dots hereby covenant that It will fully and completely comply with the terms and conditions herein mentionedq that this covenant shall run with the land* and shall be binding upon itself. its heirs, successors, e%ecutors, administrators and assfgns, that upon breach of this covenant this Planned Development District may, at the City Counci's discretion be made null and void and thereupon said property shall once more become subject to the regulations applicable to property in the 4V - Agricultural Toning Aistrict under the terms of the Ton- ing Ordinance of the City of Denton without a-ly right on the part of itself, its }.sirs, successors, execul.>rs, administrators or assfgns to continue the devalopment of sa!! premises a, dunned. SECTION 11. that the City Coun.-il of the City of D#-.ono Texas, hereby 'finds that such Planned Development District -s In accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of aroatoting the left- oral welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and With reasonable consideration, a-tong atner things, for the co-,iracter of the land and for its oaculfar suitability or peculiar uses and with a view to Co"J*rvlnq the Value of the hones and bufidinlS in the vicinity, protecting human lives- and encouraQfal the loft appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton 404 its Citizens. .j. S.SCTIOM Ill. (hat this ordinance shall be in full force and effect iarsedfately after its aasaage and wrevals the r"ofred public hearings having htretofor0 been hold by the planning and Zonin! Commission and the City council of the City of Dea 4fts Texas, after giving due notice there'. PASSED AND APPROVED this the dap of Saptamber. A. D. 1969. i CITY Of DeNTOii. TEXAS ATTEST: ///,z .t 41 CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS 10 LEGAL FOAM; . Oa Of OINTONe TEXAS I k { DACE : 10/21/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and members of the *:i ty Counr,i I FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE Z-1835 kECUMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. SUMMARY: A 58.662 acre tract located west of North Locust and northwest of Hercules Lane. The proposed concept plan for the planned development includes retail, multi-family, garden homes, single family-79 and a greenbelt. BACKGROUND: The property is located ip a low intensity area; however, expansion of the moderate area to include the retail and multi -fami ly areas is justified, PROGRAMS,-DE PARTMENTS OR GROUPS-AFFECTED: Eigiat (8) property owners within two hundred (200) feet were notified. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact can be duiu rmined at this time. Respectfully submitted: -LIo Prepared by: City M ngger G_ Cecile Carson Urban !Tanner ~ho App v Jeff -M - Director of Planning and Development 188:~g ~a" a„ ~`fg~~°~,-mg,"'~ °.'e._ . a .f``r wh :e+• ~.E +Y.~ ,:R_, i~ s t•qa= PLANNING AND ZONING COMM►SSION RECOMMLNDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1835 Meeting Date: October 21, 1986 GEVERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Bill Roberds Roberds Investment, Inc. 5956 Sherry Lane, Suite 1810 Dallas, Texas 75225 Status of Applicant: Owner RequeLted Action: A change in zoning from the agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) district. The planned development would permit the following land uses: General Retail - 2.84 acres Multi-Family - 11.10 acres, 190 total units, with a density of 17.1 units per acre Gardenhome - 7.21 acres, 74 total units, with a density of 04 2 units per acre Single Family - 7 - 18.64 acres, 76 total units, with a density of 4.1 units per acre Greenbelt - 18.81 acres Location and Size: A 58.662 acre tract located west of North Locust (FM 2164) and northwest of Hercules Lane. Surrounding Land Use and zoning: North - Planned Development (PD) Sough - Single Family (SF-7) and Planned Development (PD) Fast - Single family (SF-lU) and Agricultural (A) West - Agricultural (A) and Planner) Development (PD) Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area L Z! (Case Z-1835) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: FM 2164 (N. Locust) is a primary major arterial. Hercules Lane classification is a collector street, A 24 foot section of Hercules Lane mast be completed with this development. All access to the general retail should be off Hercules Lane. Sidewalks will be required on one side of all public streets. Utilities: An existing 12" water line on FV 2164 should be sufficient for project and the City would be interested in coversizing to a 16" water line. An existing 15" sanitary sewer line is approximately 21600' south and 2,900' east of Stuart Lane. An oversize agreement for the sanitary sewer line will be required by the City. Drainage: Drainage is a major issue with this tract, Detention will be required because of location in the Cooper Creek drainage basin. HISTORY In June of 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of a planned development that included: 2.84 acres - general retail, 302 multi-family units, 140 townhouse units and a greenbelt. Two requests by Mel Lacquement on the property north and west of this tract were denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, A third request by Mel Lacquement was approved by the City Council on September 2, 1986. The planned development includes general retail, office, multi-family, townhouse, zero lot lines, neighborhood service, single family-10, and single family-7,5. A 59.14 acre tract south of this property was approved on September 16, 1986 by the City Council for single family-7 zoning. ANALYSIS The property is located in a low intensity area according to the Denton Development Guide and currently under the intensity (Case Z-1835) Page Three ANALYSIS (continued) standard. The low intensity areas are the primary residential areas of the City and were created to insure the overall intensity balance in the City. The intensity standard for both the low and moderate areas is at capacity because of the Lacquement request (Z-1815) being approved. The intensity standard for the moderate area would not be violated if the general retail and multi-family areas are added to the moderate node. The single family - 7 and gardenhome areas would be added to the low intensity area and would be a logical land use for this planning area, The planned development, if approved, would provide a transition of land use from the moderate area to the low intensity area on the west and south, The general retail and multi-family areas would need to be added to the moderate area, in order to not violate policy, but these two areas would provide a transition from the substation to the residential area to the west. The gardenhome and single family - 7 areas would be compatibla with the townhouses and single family to the north and single fancily to the south. The proposal includes 2,84 acres of general retail. Two parcels, a .84 acre and a 20,74 acre, are zoned general retail at the intersection of Loop 288 and EM 2164. The general retail area in this proposal violates the 4 acre concentration policy and 1/2 mile separation between non-residential uses if the area is included in the low intensity area. However, an expansion of the moderate area to include this area may be justified. The multi-family area includes 190 units which violates the concentration policy for multi-family in a low intensity area, because a limit of 200 units separated by a 1/2 mile is the policy of the Development Guide. However, if this area is added to the moderate area, the 750 unit concentration will not be violated. The property does have a planning constraint caused by the Texas Municipal Power Agency easement and the City of Denton electric substation. As stated in the History secti:)n, 412 acres of property to the north and west has been approved for a planned development by the City Council. The petitioner in this case has attempted to match the zoning on the property to the north and west. The Planning and Zoning Commission stated at the June 11, 1986 meeting that the planning constraints on this property did appear to justify the expansion of the moderate area to the easement and the easement would form a logical planning boundary for the moderate area. However, the staff is concerned about the general retail abutting the single family (SP-10) zoning to the east, but this is the only planning issue that the staff is concerned about in the case, (Cage Z-1835) Page Four RECOMMENDATION The Planni.ng and ~~4~nq,.YCo:gm~ a.ai ~t~ ` r®oAlamer~de r dpprs~~ta~ by a vote of,.7t0 Ww tb the following conditions: 1. Land uses in the general retail area shall be all uses permitted in the general retail district in Article 7, Section H - Retail Service Type Uses rind the following additional uses: gasoline service etation, nu-w auto parts sales stores, and auto laundry. 2. The single family - 7 area shall be consistent with the single family - 7 district in Article 7, Section B - Primary Residential Uses and all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Concept plan 3. Development Standards 4. Reply Form Total 5. Mailing List 6. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commissicn meeting of September. 10, 1986. 0250e i + + Z OWN kkk 1835 A ± Spl0 I E PD-7x SF A MF-l I (01 14;0 I ~ f IMF-R; El PO-25 PO 53 I 1 i ! I MF-A .-r RV F _ s ' tl' 'ryiYrj •r~,1 ~ . } 1 wr ! ! f, Wi{~1 M wwrill N~4.M r. r~ ~Y~ k Nr •fr~~ _ , f / ~ N~~ 1~ 1~ 1~1~wNwrNw 1 N .S /J ` IY wlNwwl MwFw .N«. N .rMNAI I V X11111["~ •'R • ~w~ • 1, ~ilill.►.~1 ~wwrl~ ~ Y} ! YIIN «NY IY A~'yl Q- Llm~v , rwINr« 4+r jk NI ratom Nw~rW" MM IN% .h MW W~,+rM~wy w w 1r ir~•K I~ r ~1 Ti~~ir IZTwrrT.riZy~rN IoW ~NM~ /yll}H rrl/ T ~~1 •,5!+rllr►w~P~IA~MU►r «rN , 1 w Irl~•Irrr« Ni ITYNr N 411 r K W • Y'[~*'0r +wrlw Mw r 1 ~ f ~ 1~ ~ i • i•~ r•• ,r~1 Wir•' +i Nrill IM Ii11 1101(.rr•) Iii~wJr.•%MI IIIMMI f I ~7 w ww+Y+I Na rri~1~'I Ii;~ iM j',1P1NNN FA 1Y • M •rr•w w 141rA I.NI NMY A M ~.r. 7 HI l ~ rr.Yr 1.11 10 [ Id II JI H •wLM4 N.11 }•bl. L.w 1,w S f11 }I+ y~ }w fowurR) s t N! Nt W w +M 4:1005 Iw _.ey„ ~,ri sp1 M TKpI. N1Rs I1[{'r11 SE.Kt .Ira J OWN ~ p ~ .il ' 11 w~l ►t ~ ~ [s 1r ~ ~ ~ /IM[1 +.0+ +IIM r{ yf % IiA V 1111 y/« ~ 11 1~ ~ ,ssM'r pf ~rrlc~ ~Irr~_wf"' W ~ i A "".M , J - I M. w 11.'1'1«{ w rt IAN ZONING CONCI=P►' PL~4lt 4"W U~ . of re[ r.lai.la OW.U* Ta" IOPM . (WI4W6Vp A PP1'T 10 t/,~+M1 Ir[ M rr ww.) o, IV /J +~Ilrl.ll 1j M N I 1 w11• f,M 1N . Iw414w Wrll • /.1 lrllywrl. "To'k/'/er ROb~RPh iIJ1lE5TM T5 IIJG. BURKE ENGINEERING >O ' 19F~ h 1 11 1♦ • 1 1+ 1 1 I r V. I I I I• Ialn• I GENERAL NOTL9t i, Proposed density for the M-F section is 17,1 units/ac., yielding a total of 190 units. Proposed density for SF-7 is 4,1 unite/ac., yielding a total of 76 homes, 74 Garden Homes are proposed at a density of 10.2 snits/ac, 2. The M-F section will be limited to two-story structure height, The Garden Home section will be limited to two-story structure height, 1. All interior public streets will have 50' right-of-way, 4, 'rhe GR and M-F sections will conform to all applicable zoning and sub- division regulations for these respective classifications, 5, The Garden Rome section is proposed to provide either zero lot line de- tached single family, or conventional structure placement residential use, in individual Garden Home ynit may have a side on a lot line, (Please refer to the typical detail on this sheet,) Minimum proposed lot width for these lots is 75' at the front building line and miminum lot depth is 100'. The minimum lot area for each will be 4.900 sq. ft, Front setbacks dre proposed to be 251, side setbacks of zero along one side (if utilized as a Zero Lot Line) and 8' on the opposite aide, or 6' on each side if not used as Zero Lot Line, and 10' rear setback, 6. Building shapes are subject to determination with preparation of final architectural designs, y. Thla land is currently designated as low intensity by the Devulopment Guide. The anticipated development schedule for completion of each section is; Section Detailed Plnn Construction SF-7 Aug, 1987 Nov. 1988 Garden Home/Townhouse Aug. 1987 Nov, 1988 General Retail Nov, 1987 Nov, 1988 'tulti-Family Nov, 1988 Mar. 1989 5;, All waterlines and sanitary sewer lines will he designed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Denton. 0. The General Retail building structure will be setback 110' from the F.M. 2164 R-O-W and 50' from the Hercules R-O-W, The M-F building structures will be setback 35' from the Hercules R-O-W. r+. No structure, other than a single project sign, is proposed for the 75' Greenbelt along N, Locust, The neximum building area at the GR is 49,400 sq. ft. The structure will be ono-story high. A clubhouse and pool are planned for the 11-F area and the Greenbelt will be utilized as much as allowed by the T.M.P.A. for recreational use. y. Screening will be indicated on the Detailed Pldn, a. All access to the General Retail section will be from Hercules. I i i i LAND USE TRIP GENERATION AREA (acres) (trips/ac./day) TRIPS/DAY General Retail 2.84 650 Multi-Family 11.10 199 19846 Gar.Nm. 19529 7o27 SF-7 18,64 100 720 Greenbelt 18.81 41 759 Totals 58.66 40854 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY LAND USE AREA (acres) NO. of UNITS UNITS/ACRE Gen. Retail 2.84 Multi-Family 11.10 190 - Gar.Hm. 7.27 17.1 SF-7 18.64 74 10.2 Greenbelt 18.81 76 4.1 Totals 58.66 3<i0 Averaga Gross Density . 6.1 Units/acre. PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1835 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received L.i ~a r 1~ AI WML~ <~a 10 e, ee~zfL, I IV 74 144 r r CGI ay P Z Minutes September 10, 1986 Page 5 meets all requirements of the City of Denton Zoning Ordi- nance and Planned Development Ordinance. She said that staff would note that 9.71 of the property is proposed for • landscaping for this project while staff recommends 201 landscaping as a standard for all nonresidential areas. However, in this case a reduction ray be considered accept- able because the adiacent tracts have little or no land- scaping, She said that thin yroject includes landscaping around the buildings and in the parking lot which gives the appearance of more open space, She said that staff recommends approval of Z-1834, REBUTTAL: Mr, Hastings asked that the Commission approve tff_e_1etailed plan and preliminary plat. Mr. Claiborne asked if he had dealt with landscaping requirements in other cities. Mr. Hastings stated that the Cityy of Dallas has a landscaping ordinance that is very difficult to understand and he has no specifics or requirements in other cities. Chair declared public hearing closed, DECISION: Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of Z-1834. Seconded by Mr, Escue. Mr, Holt stated that he went to Fort Collins, Colorado over his vacation. He said that this city has an 18 to 201 landscaping requirement, fie said that everything has landscapping and it is beautiful, He said that it is un- bellevable how important we feel about our city and how it looks. He said that he had no problefa with the property and plans. He said that the Commission should consider these kind of plans and let people know that the City is going to require landscaping and it will pay off in the long run, a said that there is no reason why Denton can not be like Fort Collins. He said that the city should act quickly on establishing an ordinance. Vote was called oad motion carried (6.1). Mr. Holt voted no. C. Z•1835. Petition of Burke Engineering, representing ST TNoberds, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) to the planned development district and approval of a concept pplan on a 58.662 acre tract located west of North Locust (PM 2164) and northwest of Hercules Lane, The property is more fully described in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract 1288. If approved, the planned development would permit the following land uses: Ueneral Retail - 2.84 acres Multi-Family - 11.00 acres, 190 total units, with a density of 17.3 units per acre Uarden/Townhouse - 7.20 acres, 74 total units, with a density of 10.3 units per acre Sin le Family-7 - 18,50 acres, 76 total units, w th a density of 4.1 units per acre Greenbelt - 19.12 acres Bight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposition. PETITIONER: Brian Burke, Burke Engineering representing bill Roberdso stated that they have been before the Com- mission and are back with modifications. He said that they have had meetings with Ms. Carson, Mel Lacquerent, and Mr. Tripp. He said that they understand and concur with the staff report. He said that they have provided adequate transition and feel it is consistent with zoninp P f z tlt'autq September 18, 1986 Page 6 on the north, west, and south. He said that their concern is the S 10 and possible residential on the east side of North Locust. He said that there is a 100 feet of right- of-way plus an additional 50 feet of greenbelt on their property. ke said that the SP-10 surrounds a drainage feature and feel with all this a fairly effective buffer is obtained, Mr. Claiborne asked where the drainage channel is In relation to this property, Mr. Burke stated that it is across the street. Mr. Claiborne asked if their property is abutted by the Swinney Tebo tract on the north and west. Mr. Burke said yes, Mr. ,the asked If the property on the other side of the easement belongs to Mr. Tripp, Mr. Burke sold yes. Ms. Brock asked if the additional land uses In the gen- eral retail area were added at their request. Mr. Burke said the service station use was added at their request. Ms. Carson stated that the other uses were added because the nature of the market is to combine land uses, for example: 7-11 store and Chief's Auto Parts and Mobil service station and a car wash, IN PAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAPP KEPORT: Ms. Carson stated that this property is lucare n a low intensity area and currently under the intensity standard. She said that the intensity standard for both the low and moderate areas is at capacity because of the Lacquement request (Z-1815) being approved. She said that the intensity standard for the moderate area would not be violated if the general retail and multi- family areas are added to the moderate node. The single family-7 and gardenhome areas would be added to the low intensity area and would be a logical land use for this planning area. She said that the planned development, if approved, would provide a transition of land use from the moderate area to the low intensity ,res on the west and south. She said that the property does have a planning constraint caused by the Texas Municipal Power Agency easement and the City of De ton electric substation, She sold that the Planning and Zoning Commission stated at the June 11, 1986 meeting that the planning constraints on this property did appear to justify the expansion of the moderate area to the easement and the easement would form a logical planning boundary for the moderate area. She said that staff is concerned about the general retail area abutting the atingle family (SP-10) zoning to the east, but this is the only planning issue that the staff Is concerned about in the case, She added that staff recommends approv- al of Z-1835 with conditions, REBUTTAL; Mr. Burke stated that he was available for ques on`s. Chair declared the public herring closed. DECISION: Mr. Claiborne stated that at the last public Hearing the petitioner was working with the constraints of the property, He said that the Commission stipulated to the petitioner o reduce the multi-family area to less than 200 units and it was done. He asked if the garden- home area is to be single family detached. Ms, Carson said yes. Mr. Claiborne stated that at least this would break up the concept of the feeling of apartments. sit F i' t Mf6ures September 10, 1986 Page 7 Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval of Z-193S with the following conditions: I. Land uses in the general retail area shall be all uses permitted in the general retail district in Article 7, Section H - Retail Service Type Uses and the following additional uses: gasoline service station, new auto parts sales stores and auto laundry. The single family-3 area shall be consistent with the single family-7 district In Article 7, Section B - Primary Residential Uses and all reqquirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Seconded by Mr. [ammen. Ms, Brock stated that the constraints were not put on the property by the city after It was purchased. She added that this proposal has 340 dwelling units. Mr. Claiborne asked about the overall unit per acre ' density. Mr, Holt said 5,795 not taking into consi- deration the intensity from the retail, Mr. Claiborne asked for the density minus the retail. Mr. Escue said eight units per acre. Mr. Holt stated that he would vote for this proposal but probably would be the last time. He said that this is a prime example of what occurs out of the first come, first serve policy. He said that he thought in the future this area would become the most dense area in the City of Denton if it ever develops. He said that the Commission needed to look at the overall area, He added that he had no problem with the particular plan. LVote was called and motion unanimously carried (7-0), D. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL RHPLAT OF THE ONSLEY PARR ADDITION, Lot IOR, Block , STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this is a 0.546 acre tract zoned ■ulti-family (MF-1). Multi-family development is planned and the purpose of the replat is to remove ex- isting lot lines between lots 10.12. An existing frame apartment building will remain. The property is located at the northwest corner of Bonnie Brae aad Louise Street. He said that the Development Review Committee recommends approval. PETITIONER: Greg Edwards, Metropiex Engineering Corpora- U of n, sUA-Ted that the replat meets all requirements and they would appreciate approval, IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present, Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Escus moved to recommend approval of the pelmTary and final replat of the Owsley Park Addition, tot IOR, Block 9, Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and unani- mously carried (7-0), V. CONSIDERATIONS A. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF THE THETFORD ADDITION, Lot 1, Block A, STAFF REPORT: Mr, Allison stated that this is an 0.424 act¢ tract local4d at the northwest corner of U,S. Highway 3805 and Cooper Creek road; property Is zoned light Indus- - a-ir 1615L NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 58,6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF NORTH LOCUST STREET (F.M. 2164) AND NORTHWEST OF HERCULES LANE, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION At;D USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the zoning classification and use designation of S8.6 acres of real property, described in Exhibit "A", attached here- to and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use designation to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use designa- tion under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION I.T. That the "concept plan", attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved as the concept plan for the district herein established, in accordance with the provisions of article 11 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION III. That the district herein approved shall be subject to the following conditions, restrictions, and limitations: 1, Permitted land uses in the area shown as general retail shall be restricted to those uses shown in the schedule of uses of Article 7, Section H ("Retail and Service Type Uses") of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, and the following additional uses: gasoline service station, new auto parts sales store, and auto laundry. 2. The area designated for single-family (SF-7) use shall be developed and used in accordance with the permitted uses and regulations applicable to the single-family (SF-7) zoning Z-183S/PAGE 1 . .rte districts as provided for in Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. SECTION IV. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-10 as amended, is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications, SECTION V. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the waximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY STEPHENSt MAYOR- CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: ^~f 1n :Mrs Z-1835/PAGB 2 All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Thro ma Toby Survey, Abstract No. 1288e Denton Countle Teasse and being part of a tailed 65.00 acre tract described in a decd recorded In Volume 819, Page a4, Deed Reeoris Denton County, Takaa, and being wore particularly described as toll ass beginning at a steel pin at the northeast corner of said 65.0 acre tract, also being on the west right--of-voy of xars-to-Karket load 21641 Thence South 01.29127" West vith the west right-of-tray of told Fate-to-Market Road, a distance of 412.38 feet to a steel pin at the northeast cotter of a tract deeded to the City of Denton, recorded in Volume 752, page 972; Thence North 89'29'54" west with the north line of said City of Denton tract e dis,taace of 300.04 feet to s steel pin at the northwest corner of said City ;tractl rhtnee South 01'19'20" West with the west line of sold City tract a distance of 279.60 feet to s steel pin at the northeast Irner of s tract deeded to 71SPA as recorded in Volume 1116, Page 423, Deed ecords$ Thence North 89'36157" West with the north line of said TKPA tract4 distance of 450.0 feet to a steel pin at the northwest corner of said TMPA tract= Thence South 01`19011" West vith the west line of said 7M?A tract a distance of 284.05 feet to a steel pin at the southwest corner of sold TRPA tract, also being on the south line of said 6540 acre tractl 71hrnce North 89'42'09"' West with a fence and with the south line of said 65.0 acre tract a distance of 764.38 feet to a steel pin at a fence corner ;wigt to 7b esice North 89'31122" Wert with the south line of said 65.0 acre tract a distance of 1404.48 feet to a steel pin at the southwest corner of said 65.0 acre tract; Thence North 01'20136" East with the west line of sold 65.0 acre tract a distance of 977.7 feet to a steel pin of the northwest eor»er of said 650 acre tract; pence Sovth 89132156" East with the north line of Najd 65.0 acre tract n dlstehr,e of 2918,99 feet to the Point of Acginning containing is all 58.652 acres (if kind, more or less. I s COLEMAN S►. ASSOCe SURVEYING 317 S, LOCUST, SUITS 108 • P.O. BOX 686 • DENTON, TEXAS 76202-0688 • {817) 5658215 2,•84 General Retail FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the Thomas Toby Survey Abstract Number 1288 in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas and being a part of the called 58..662 acre tract described in the Deed from James F. Lunsford, Trustee at al to Roberds Investments, Inc. Trustee recorded in Volume 1705 PaAe 163 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Tex- as; the subject tract being more oartieularly described as followss BEGINNING for the Northeast Corner of the tract being described herein at a steel pin at the Northeast Corner of the said 58.662 acre tract in the Best line of FM Highway 21641 THENCE South 01 Degree 23 Minutes 27 Seconds West wtih the East line of the-said 58;.,662 acre tract and the West line of the said highway a dist- ance of 412.08 feet to a steel pin at the Northeast Corner of a City of Denton Tract recorded in'Volume 732 PaRe 972 of the said Deed'Recordsj THENCE North 89 Degrees 29 Minutes 54 Seconds West with the North line of the said City of Denton Tract a distance of 30044 feet to a steel pin at the Northwest Corner thereof) THENCE North 01 Degree 19 Minutes East a distance of 412..A feet more or less to a point in the North line of the said 58.662 acre tracts THENCE South 89 Degrees 32 Minutes 56 Seconds East with the North line of the said 58.•662 acre tract a distance of 300.6 feet more or less to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 2,,84 acres of land, more or less., These Field Notes were prepared from record information only-. Michael J... Kern R..,R.S., No„ 4158 Date a0 F a~ ....i ...............►..i►,. MICHAEL J, KERN 4158 .eG~~ aea~~b 66Oz 7 COLEMAN & ASSOC. SURVEYING 417 S. LOCUST, SUITE 108 • P.O. BOX 886 • DENTON, TEXAS 762024" (817) 585.8215 141 Multi-Family FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the Thomas Toby Survey Abstract Number 1288 in the City of Denton, Denton Coun- ty. Texas and being a part of the called 58.,662 acre tract described in the Deed from James F., Lunsford, Trustee et al to Roberds Invest- ments. Inc. Trustee recorded in Volume 1705 Page 163 of the Deed Re- cords of Denton County, Texas the subiect tract being more partic- ularly described as followsl BEGINNING for the Northeast Corner of the tract being described here- in at a point in the North line of the said 58;.1662 acre tract, said point being North 89 Degrees 32 Minutes 56 Seconds West a distance of 300.,0 feet from the Northeast Corner thereof] THENCE South 01 Degree 19 Minutes West at 412 feet more or less pass- ing the Northeast Corner of a City of Denton Tract recorded in Vol- ume 732 Page 972 of the said Deed Records and continuing along said course# in ally a total distance of 634 feet more or less to a point in the North line of a 60 foot easement described in the Deed from James F,. Lunsford, Trustee to Brazos Electric Coop recorded in Vol- ume 749 Page 395 of the said Deed Recordsl THENCE North 89 Degrees 33 Minutes West with the North line of the said easement a distance of 764 feet more or less to a point for the Southwest Corner of the herein described tract] THENCE North 01 Degree 19 Minutes East a distance of 634 feet more or less to a point in the North J.`ne of the said 58(.,662 acre tract for the Northwest Corner of the harain described tractl THENCE South 89 Degrees 32 Minutes 56 Seconds East with the North line of the said 58,.,662 acre tract a distance of 764 feet more or less to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 11.1 acres of land more of less( These Field Notes were prepared from record information only.., IKWA~ Mi hael J..• Kern R-.,P,.,S., No, 4158 Da e OF MICHAEL 1. KERN ,dt 4158 SUR COLEMAN& ASSOCe SURVEYING 417 S. LOCUST, SUITE 106 • P.O. BOX 686 . DENTON, TEXAS 76202-M • (897) 585.8215 7..27 Garden Homes/Town [louse FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the Thomas Toby Survey Abstract Number 1288 in the City of Denton, Denton Coun- ty, Texas and being a part of the called 58,.,662 acre tract described in the Deed from James Fm Lunsford, Trustee et al to Robards Invest- ments, Inc, Trustee recorded in Voli:me 1705 Page 163 of the Deed Re- cords of Denton County. Texasi the subject tract being more partic- ularly described as follows: BEGINNING for the Northsgegt Corner of the tract being described here- in at a point being the most Northerly Northeast Corner of a called 14..,56 acre easement described in the easement from James F.. Lunsford, Trustee to 'luxas Municipal Power Agency recorded in Volume 1097 Page 352 of the said Deed Records, said point also being South 89 Degrees 33 Minutes East a distance of 1356 feet more or less from the North- west Corner of the said 58.,662 acre tracts THENCE South 89 DegreeR 33 Min+►tes East with the North line of the said 59.,662 acre tract a distance of 500.,0 feet more or less to a point for the Northeast Corner of,the herein desoribed tract= THENCE South 01 Degree 19 Minutes West a distance of 634«0 feet more or less to a point in the North line of a 60,foot wide easement de- scribed in the Deed from James F. Lunsford, Trustee to Brazos Elso- tr.,io Coop recorded in Volume 749 Paee 395 of the said Deed Recordsl THENCE North 89 Degrees 33 ftutes West with the North line thereof a distance of 500.0 feet more or less to a point in the East line of the said Texas Municipal Power Agency Easement for the Southwest Corner of the herein described tract; THENCR North 01 Degrees 19 riinates East with the East line of the said Texas Mun- icipal PioAe4- Agency easement a distance of 634 feet mace or less to the PLACE OF BE- GI*= and enclosing 7.27 acres of land, more or leas. These Field Notes were prepared from record information onlvo Mic'oael J., Kern k.,PrvS., Na„ 4158 Date OF ~~'~'fs r~~~K1ISMAEL J. KERN... .,.t..... 4158......... 00 . ~ f COLEMAN & ASSOC. $UAVEYING 417 S. LOCUST, SUITE 106 . P.O. BOX 888 . DENTON, TEXAS 76202.OON . (817) 585.8215 18..,64 Sin81e-17amily-7 FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the Thomas Toby Survey Abstract Number 1288 in the City of Denton, Denton Coun- ty, Texas and being a part of the called 58;.,662 acre tract described • in the Deed from Jamen Fr., Lunsford, Trustee et al to Roberds Invest- mentsp Inc, Trustee recorded in Volume 1705 Page 163 of the Deed Re- cords of Denton County, Texas; the subject tract being more partic- ularly described as foilowst i BEGINNING for the Northwest Corner of the tract being described here- in at the Northwest Corner of the said 58,4,662 acre tractf THENCE South 89 Degrees 32 Minutes 56 Seconds East with the North line of the said tract a distance of 1281 feet to a point at the most Northerly Northwest Corner of a called 14:.,56 acre easement described in the easement from James F,., Lunsford, Trustee to Texas Municipal Power Agency recorded in Volume 1097 Page 352 of the said Deed Records; THENCE South 01 Degrees 19 Minutes West with the West line of the said easement a distance of 634 feet more or less to a point in the North line of a 60 foot wide ease- ment described in the Deed from JamAS F,., Lunsford. Trustee to Brazos Electric Coop recorded in Volume 749 Page 395 of the said Deed Recorder THENCE North 89 Degrees 33 Minutes West with the North line of the said Brazos Electric Easement a distance of 1281 feet more or less to a point in the West line of the said 58,.,662 acre tract for the Southwest Corner of the herein de- scribed tract; THENCE North 01 Degree 19 Minutes East with the said West line a distance of 634 feet more or less to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 18.64 acres of land more or less; These Field Notes were prepared from record information onlym., 111 c ael J;., Kern Now 4158 ate 1}! MICHAEL, I XERN ..1....1 H.1..I.. N..... N.. 4158 1 COLEMAN & ASSOC. SURVEYING 417 S. LOCUST, SUITE 106 ROO BOX 686 . DENTON, TEXAS 78202-0688 • (617) 565.6215 18,81 Acres Greenbelt FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the Thomas Toby Survey Abstract Number 1288 in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas and being a part of the called 58.662 acre tract described in the Deed from James F., Lunsford, Trustee et al to Roberds Tnvestmentap Inc... , Trus- tee recorded in Volume 1705 Page 163 of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texas the subject tract being more particularly described as followst BEGINNING for the Southwest Corner of the tract being described herein at the Southwest Corner of the said 58,662 acre tract; THENCE North 01 Degrees 20 Minutes East with the West line of the said 58.662 acre tract a distance of 342 feet more or less to the Northwest Cor- ner of a Texas Municipal Power Agency Easement; . ' THENCE South 89 Degrees 33 Minutes East with the North line of the said easement s distance of 1281 feet more or less to an angle point in the said easement; THENCE North 01 Degrees 19 Minutes East continuing with the said easement a distance of 634 feet more or less to a point in the North line of the said 58.•662 sore tract; r THENCE South 89 Degrees 33 Minutes East with the N(,rth line a distance of 75.00 feet to a point in the East line of the said easement; THENCE South 01 Degi2as 19 Minutes West with the said East line of the said easement a distance of 634 feet to'an angle point in the said easements THENCE South 89 Degrees 33 Minutes East continuing with the North line of the said easement a distance of 1264 feet more or less to a point in the East line of the said 58••662 acre tracts THENCE South 01 Degrees 19 Minutes West with the East line a distance of 050,00 feet to a re-entrant corner of the said 58••662 acre tract; THENCE North 89 Degrees 37 Minutes 00 Seconds West with the South line of the said tract a distance of 450.•00 feet to a re-entrant corner of the said tracts THENCE South 01 Degrees 19 Minutes West with the East line of the said tract a distance of 284 feet more or less to the South Southeast Corner of the said 584662 acre traots THENCE North 89 Degrees 29 Minutes Wast with the South line of the said 58.662 acre tract and the South line of the abovementioned easement a dis- tance of 2170 feet more or less to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 18.81 acres of land, more or loss.. These Field Notes were prepared from record information only.., Michael J.• Kern R,p.S« No.. 4158 Date w EXHIBIT "B" CONCEPT PLAN FOR ROBERDS INVESTMENTS, INC., CONSISTING OF: 1. Conceptual Site Plan (1 page) 2. General Notes, Development Schedule and Development Summary (2 pages). 2-1835 a ME,' 1. I i{. YIi LY rI.Yt^.I~rr 4•.r~lrYY . . ~ ' 1 i . YYIIYW WY~.AM4.~ IYIr h 1'IwIYY~ YL:=C 1f Rq. ` yyy ly ~y . E fi w«..r .I. ~~J~.« ~li t~I f i • r. ~ ~ {I": ~III~ I I + , ,II -kill t~ I. µ~r.~ ~ ~TIb~A~~'f~Y~Ydd'.n Yr1A 1 / . III ,~1, IIYIb ~Y fJ/f~1w 411teM eir er Y• ' IYMM .1 ♦L~eOM/IMIIIL~ M~MYIIiar~i1 11*M ' .I •I •Y. 1 ~ ` ~Aw. MIIYIMY 1 y. •J , I I I y, l 1W ItlMf IIIMW~1.111 "Mos I ~ 1wo a~_ fr M l wLM1`Yr. TOM LAW AM IM"It w ~IYI ©T'~^~"M I?x+ *.1 I 10' t tM M a sm" Aaa I~ y w r ~ rl~ C t Yl..t r cA ~ L@lltr 'rtes tn.■ en . r=ta►~.rr uwa.4tMltdll~ IMAM _ A~eL 40 WFW N wr ILA - l +1 wtatw ' on e+~""I r Lr ~r ~A !I►r!J'!! A rA' ' Ids I nMael I Fiw~vr ZDNfNG_CQNCEPf PLAN *Ib Aaa1lll M y t ' • WILP%4!op ADPIT.MoY)_ ov;o a"r"'> tr.ra anw~r OSU.A101A ll!PM Z'~ * M Y, f '~;f9 .1 MLM Y t 1 I 1MM ' Iwl. f1,Y it r MIS M•w IY Mf • /.1 Yr.I.I, °"t`I''/'/M RO6ERG5 IIJV~~~YM 1~a IIJG. BUWE ENGINEERWG KZ> ~N ~u~M YMY 1 19F\ .9" 1 f 1 I I Al 664 . I Lr V.. ~I 11 M ..M I k~. Tom' g , r• - ' `-'3 rrc. _ ~ ` r GENERAL NOTES; 1. Proposed density for the M-F section is lt,i unite/ac., yielding a total of 190 units. Proposed density for SF-7 is 4.1 units/ac., yielding a total of 76 homes, 74 Garden Homes are proposed at a density of 10.2 units/Ac. 2, The M-F section will be limited to two-atory structure height. The Garden Noma section will be limited to two-story structure height, 3, All interior public streets will have 50' right-of-way, 4, The CR and M-F sections will conform to all applicable zoning and sub- division regulations for these respective classifications. S, The Carden Home section is proposed to provide either zero lot line de- tached single family, or conventional structure placement residential use, An individual Garden Home yW, may have a side on a lot line. (Please refer to the typical deteil on this sheet,) Minimum proposed lot width for these lots is 35' at the front building line and mimtnum lot depth is 100. The minimum lot area for each will be 4,900 sq. ft. Front amtbacks are proposed to be 25', aide setbacks of zero along one aide (if utilized as a Zero Lot Line) and 8 on the opposite side, or 6' on each side if not used as Zero Lot Line, and 10' rear setback. 6. Building shapes are subject to determination with preparation of final architectural designs, 7. This land is currently designated as low intensity by the Development Guide, The anticipated development schedule for completion of each section is; - Section Detailed Plnn Construction SF-7 Aug, 1987 Nov, 1988-- Garden Home/Tornhouse Aug, 1987 Nov. 1988 General Retail lov, 1987 Nov, 1988 Multi-Family Nov. 1968 Mar, 1989 Q, All waterlines and sanitary sewer lines will be designed in accordance -4ith the requirements of the City of Denton. D. The General Retail building structure will be setback 110' from the F.M. 2164 i►-0 W and 50'from the Hercules R-0-41, The M-F building structures will be setback 331 from the Hercules R-0-41. No structure, other than a single project sign, is proposed for the 75' Greenbelt along N. Locust. ' The maximum building area at the GR is 49,400 sq. ft. The structure will be ono-story high. A clubhouse and pool are planned for the 14-F area and the Greenbelt will be utilized as much as allowed by the T.M.P.A. for recreational use. y. Screening will be indicated on the Detailed Plan. All access to the General Retail section will be from Hercules. LAND USE AREA (acres) TRIP GENERATION (trips/ac./day) TRIPS/DAY General Retail 2.84 Multi-Family 11010 650 1 t 846 Gar. H4. 7,27 139 1,529 SF-7 18.6 4 100 Gninbelt 18.81, 41 720 759 Totals 58.66 4,854 DEV=PWM SUMWy LAND USE _ AREA (acres) N0. of UNITS UHITS/ACRE Gen. Retail 2.84 Multi-Faaily 11.10 ' Gar. }m' 7.27 190 17.1 SF-7 18. 64 74 10.2 Greenbelt 18.81 76 4.1 Totals 58,66 340 Average Gross Density . 6.1 Units/acre. I DATE: October 21, 1986 QTY COURC I L~R, MT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: P.O.f 73417 - R 8 P PROPERTIES, INC. RECTO, TI We recommend this Purchase Order be approved to pay R 6Pies, Inc. for participation construction of Summerwind Addition Mack Drive in the amount of $27,560.50. SUNKRY: This Purchase Order covers the difference due to the developer or a construction of Sumnerwind Addition, Mack Drive with one inch extra depth and 7 feet extra width. I do not have copies of a contract to submit w;th this, but I do have a memorandum of approval from Jerry Clark, City Engineer, We have reviewed the quantities with the prices on our Bid #9607 for like participation at that time and have calculated the total partici- pation to be $27,560.50, as indicated on the attached. BACKBRM: Purchase Order Price Memo Memorandum - Jerry Clark PR06RAMSo DEPARTf+ MS OR CROUPS. AFFECTED: Street Development and Participation, Street Dept. FISCAL IAPACT: Budgeted funds 2986 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. H ell City Manage r C~ Prepared ry: ~Naa&r` John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent Approved: s ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. j1;a ; Purchasing !1 gent } C" icy Dom"o ra 911-9 TEXAS STREET PURCHABS ©RD$R DENTON, TX 74201 P.O. NUMBER DAT%NIW1NO. gTRtit*~t C1tNt TM X41'7 12RR48001: VENDOR SHIP TO: R i P PROPERTIE11e - INCe ATTN2 REX SCOTT Pe Ce MOX 276 RRAPEVINE• TX 76201 BID/REF, 0 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, UNE AMOUN 61 100 002 0033 8303 1 STREET PARTICIPATION 279560,50 02 100 002 0033 8303 SUMNERMIND The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt - House BIII No. 20. TOTAL FOR PeDe ZZ.560,50 Reference P.O. Number on all 8/L,Shipments and Invoices Shipments are F.0.8. City of Denton, or as Indicated. By Bend Invoices TO: Direct Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Manhail, C.P.M, Purchasing Agent 216 E. MoXinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D, Shaw, CAM, Asst. Purchasing Agent (or as indicated on Purchase Order) 817/666.8311 D/FW Metro 267.0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer CffyDf 01WON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 6664200 NENORANDUN DATE: September 23, 1986 TO: JERRY CLARK/JIM CORBIN FROM: JOHN J. MARSHALL SUBJECT: CITY PARTICIPATION - SUMMERWIND ADDITION, MACK DRIVE I. Bid. 9607 for prices 2. P.O. N 75417 3. Account 0 100-002-0033-8303 4. Approved by Council 5. Cost of 0 ty Participation as per Bid, A. Lime stabilization & preparation (17#) 1361 sy @ 2.25 = 3,062.25 B. 6" HMAC Asphalt 13611 sy @10.50 = 14,290.50 C. 1" HMAC Asphalt 5833 sy @ 1.75 = 109207.75 TOTAL $270560.50 PURCHASING DEPARTMENT DIFW METRO 26700/2 ^3W Fi"34h 'a' YXC~•'NA. ...rye i`Y -'F:] r Y... Y CITY of DENTON DENTON, MAS 76901 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 18, 1986 TO: John Marshall, Purshasing Agent PROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer SUBJECT: Summer Wind Addition The Engineering Division has reviewed the participation quantities submitted by Jagoe Public. Both the quantities and calculations seem to be correct. Please review the prices to see if they are at or below your bid on file. Call if we can be of assistance. Jer ak Ci ngi eer 0413E 9EP 2 3 1986 ~ON MMiCNA~ No 0 JAQOZ- PUBLIG COMPANY M GENERAL OFFICES "RS CEIVEp , f l 1P.0. BOX no , DENTON, TEXAS TOM July 11, 1986 Mr. Pete Piatakt V.-Pres. E-P Ptoperties, Inc. P.O. Box 278 Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear Pate, Below are the quantities and prices for the City of Denton's participation on their part of Mack Drive of Summerw H*K Additions City Participations 7 foot by 1750 L.P. with 6" HHAC 30 foot by 1750 L.F. with l" HKAC Lime and Preparation (170) 1,361 S.T. $ 2.25 per S.Y. $ 3,062.25 6" MAC 1,361 S.Y. @ $10.50 per S..Y. 14,290.50 1" HMAC 5,833 S.Y. @ $ 1.75 per S.Y. 10 207.75 $ 27, 0.50 I an forwarding a copy of this billing to Jerry Clark's office, so that he might get it approved for payment. 4 S MC y o s, ia V-Pres.-Finance DATE: October 21, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: 8100 9643 LOOP 288 30" WATERLINE CHARGE ORDER I1 RECOIMDATION: We recommend this Change Order be approved to reduce the contract in the amou►it of ;41,250.00. This would make the contract total reduced from $616,985.00 to $575,735.00. SUMMARY: This bid was approved by the City Council on October 7,' 1986.' We are changing, as recommended by Utilities,.from using 30" gate valves to 30" butterfly valves on this line thereby reducing the price of the total contract by the $41,250.00. This change order has been approved by the Public Utilities Board. BACKGROUND: Publi: Utilities Board Minutes Change ORder N1 PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Utility Capital Improvements FISCAL 111PACT: 'here is no additional impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. fl ell City Manager Prepared by: lit rZr' 11n marshal P.M. itie. Purchasing Agent Approved: 00 .4 n 'J. arshai C.P.M. iftl>e; Purchasing Agent DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL PROM: Lloyd harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER #19 811) #9643, LOOP 288 30" WA1'hR LINE RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board recommends to the city Council approval of the Change Order 01 reducing the total amount of the contract by $419250. If approved, the revised contract amount will be $615,985 - $410250 $575,735. SUMMARY The Utilities Staff is recommending a change order 01 to use 30" butterfly valves in lieu of 30" gate valves, A 30" butterfly valve is $7500 installed, whereas the cost for a 30" gate valve is $11,250. As a result, with 11 valves in the proposed system, a net reduction of (11 x $3750) $41,250 is being requested in the original contract. BACKGROUND This is an approved 1986 CIP project, The project is for a 3011 water line on Loop 288 from McKinney St., to University Drive, PROGRAMS, GkUUPS OR DEPARTMENTS AFFECTED City of Denton Municipal Utilities, City of Denton, Developers and the citizens. FISCAL SUMMARY The fiscal impact is as follows: Original contract amt, if approved: $6169985.00 CO Ill- Net Reduction (this request) (41,250.00) Revised contract amount $5759735.00 Change in contract complete date- NONE 0231n:16 Consider Change Order 81, bid 89643 Loop 288 30" Water Line Page Z Source of funds: Water bands--623-008-0461-9138 Respectfully submitted: oy r Prepared by: City Manager CoDa`y i d ham Assistant Director of Utilities Water/wastewater Divisions Approved: R. b. Nelson Director of Utilities Attachments: CU 01 Written quote from Lowest Bidder Location map PUB Minutes 9/24/86 0231n:17 Mot A111111111 WAM WAY0 ►AOACT: Loop 288 Waterline--1986 CIp .r CONTRACT: Bid #9643 OWNEIt: City of Denton CONTRACTOR: Dickerson Construction, Celina, Texas CHANGE ORDER: #1 DATE: 9-12-86 C14ANQ1e AY r NTRA WORK TD U pEpuag` Delete Item 2-13G 30" Gate Valve Qty, 11 @ $11,250,00 -$123,750.00 Add 11- 30" Butterfly valve at $7,500,00 +S 82 500,00 Total reduction - 411250.00 PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT: $6161985.00 MET i`Qm~ W~ (DECREASE) IN CONTRACT ' AMOUNT: 41$250.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT: 575,735,00 REVISED CONTRACT TIME OF COMPLETION: NO r CSAUGc APRUVED BY: ~ 2:~~ 4 CITY ENGINEER ASST. DIR. OF UTILITIES OIR, OF UTILITIES APROVED BY: CONTRACTOR 'IF 7 771-,'r 777 17 DICKERSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. P. 0. BOX 181 - CELINA, TEXAS 76009 - (214 382.2123 OR 382.2761 September 9# 1986 City of Denton Attn: David Hem 215 E. McKinney St. Denton, Texas 76201 Re: 1986 CIP Utilities, Loop 288 30" Watermain Oear Sir, This letter is to confirm that the price for the 30" flanged butterfly valve in lieu of Bid Item No. 2.135 30" gate valve will be seventy- five hundred ($7,500,00)dollars each. If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to call. Cordially, Lewis 0. Dickerson President/CEO LD:fl r rl r PROJECT LOCATION 7/1 J f MINUTkiS PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD September 24, 1986 MEMBhRS PRBSENT: Chairman Roland Laney, John Thompson, Edward Coowes, Kenneth Frady, Nancy Boyd, Lloyd Harrell, R. E. Nelson STAFF PRIiSENT: John McGrane, C. David Ham, Ernie Tul'los Mark McDaniel, Glenn Jaspers ' O'TIChRS PRESI~NT: David Guyot, Stanley Armbruster, Dr. Littlefield Service Center Training Room 6:00 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. Regular Agenda 8. CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER 01, BID 9643, LOOP 288 b1cKINNEY TO It LOB, Ham explained that this is a recommended reduction of the contract amount by $4192SU, thereby reducing the total contract amount from $616,98S to $S7S,73S, Thompson moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the subject change order. Boyd second. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. NO, AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATZRIALS, EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES OR SERVICES- PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ihEREFORE; AND PROVIDIN6 FOR AN ZFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solinited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- went, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHER AS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materiale, equipment, supplies or servic`o approved and accepted herein; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinaaces requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $10,000; and WHULAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposalsh attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: RID ITEM NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 9659 ALL T.F. SEARS CO. $18.818.00 SECTION IL. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the parsons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Did Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and P~roons submitting approved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a PACE ONE r formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorised to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; rrovided that the written contract is in accordance with the torus, conditions, specifications standards, quantities and specified sums' contained in the aid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepteds SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorises the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorised herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this _ 21 day of _QCTOBER , 1986. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYs PACE TWO DATE: October 21, 1986 CITY CgMIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID !9659 - CONCRETE UTILITY POLES RECOM EJ'WVITIOM: We recommend this bid be awarded to the single bidder meeting specification, T.F. Sears Co. In the amount of $18,818.00, SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a series of concrete utility poles for overhead electric construction when the required space for dead-end pole guys and angle pole guys is not available. (Golden Triangle Mail area). BACKIiROINfD: Tabulation Sheet Memorandum - Donald L. McLaughlin ' PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Utility Overhead Distribution FISCAL IMPACT: 1986/87 Budget Funds for overhead construction Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Pre red by: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: ,rw.r Nom,:/ Jahn J. Marshall, C.P.M. pW 1 t I I i I I I BID I 9659 1 VALMONT I T,F, SEARS { PRIESTER I I 1 BID TITLE CONCRETE POLES I INDUSTRIES I CO, INC. I SUPPLY I i i OPENED 1811186 21BB P.M. I i I i ► { ACCDUNTI I i I 1 i I 1 I i i-------------i-------------i-----------•--I-------------I-------------► 1 1 QTY 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR i { I- - I------------- I------------- I-------------I I i 1 i i 1 I i 1, 1 LOT I TOTAL I 8,888.88 1 18,818,10 i 51945.80 1 1 I 1 I I I i I i i I i ► i I ► I i 1 i I I I I i i i i I i i I I I 1 1 i 1 I I I i 1 i i I i I 1 1 i i I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 i I i i I 1 ► 1 I I I I CITY OF DENTON Avy"J"" FD ,4 ME ILO R A N D U M .r...rr.... .r....araMw~r~r.~r- TOs Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROMs Donald L. McLaughlin, Senior Electrical Engineer DATES October 13, 1986 SUBJs Bid #9659 Concrete Poles The Electric Utility Department recommends acceptance of the high bid by T. F. Sears Company Inc. Other bidders did not meet specification for free-standing (no guys) on deadend poles and angle poles. Regards, Donald L. McLaughlin DLM: nb 4 l I w• L 1 1/li V..ffVj ~ i ~~%jr NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THL AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC ORBS OR IMPROVEMENTS' PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVID W FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $10,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.04 of the City Charter requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness ,hall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the fallowing competitive bids for the construction of, public works or Improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita- tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached ' hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: BID NUVBFR CONTRACTOR AMOUNT _26.52. JAN-L CONSTRUCTION CO. S 09~992_no 9 ATKINS BROTHERS EQUIPMEHT M. IHC. 489.150.20 SECTION 11. That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and ;:he person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved until such person shall comply with all requirements specifiaJ in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Did Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifyx.l the terms conditions plans and specifications, standards, quantities anu specified sums contained tLiroin. PAGE ONE formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Hansger or his designated representative is hereby authorised to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terns, conditions, specifications standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bij Proposal sad related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and a roval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorises the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 21 day of OCTOBER , 1986. RAT 51UHM, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CRARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SEMMTM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE TWO ¢rz6~r1'Ar~.4,A_ .3w~, s. s v.~ n . „e ,.srf'c -y rs. ,9vm, . DATE. October 21, 1 CITY IL REPORT TO: Mayor and Mowers of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BIM %52 - PRECAST WILL CONSTRUCTION RFCIITION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of Jan-!. Construction Co, in the total amount of $99,952.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for the construction and installation of eight feet high concrete walls around the perimeters of the existing Hickory and Kings Row electric substations. These walls will serve as sight and sound barriers as well as security purposes. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet Memorandum - Josef Cherri, Electrical Engineer PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS. AFFECTED: Electric Meter and Substation Department FISCAL IMPACT: Electric Utility Bond Funds Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: Naiae: Jo>ii J. Marshall, C.P.M. Title; Purchasi ;r; I 1 I BID # 9652 1 JAN L. 1 FORT I BIITERCREEK I BID TITLE PRECAST WALL CONSTRU010NICONSTRUCTION 1 DALTON [CONSTRUCTION i i OPENED 9/16/86 2180 P.M. I CO,,INC, I CO. 1 CO. I I ACCOUNT# I i i I 1 I I I -----1------I------------- i-------------i---- # I OTY i ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I I I I I I i -------------I 1, 1 LOT IHICKORY ST. SUB STATION 1 38,972,00 1 39,000.06 1 41,133.48 1 i i I i 1 I I i 2, 1 LOT WINGS ROW SUA STATION I 60,981.00 i 70,487,10 1 64,308,11 1 i I I 1 ! 1 I I I I I i 1 1 i i I TOTAL BOTH PROJECTS 1 99,952,11 1 189,487.00 1 105,341,40 1 I 1 I + 1 I I I 1 I DID BOND 1 YES 1 YES i YES i i I i I I 1 I I I f I , I I I I I I I 1 ~ I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I i I 1 I I q~ D CITY OF DENTON U7! 4 MEMORANDUM .~~...wrwrw...~ 'M)c Tom Shawp Purchasing Agent PROMO Josef Cherri, Electrical Engineer DATEc September 24, 1986 SUHJECTc Precast Wall Construction for Hickory and Ktngsrow Substations, Sid 09652 The bid invitation for 4" precast wall construction is awarded to Jan L. Construction Co., inc., P.O. Box 410, Marlow, OYI,homa 73055. are ckft- JCcvw I 1~. TR e ti+ Uzi srP 2 5 1986 MY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON PURCHASING DEPT, WOWING 00% DATE: October 21, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID# 9656 - NORTH LOCUST STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE RECOMENDATIONt We recommend this bid be awarded to the asphalt low bidder Atkins Brothers Equipment Co., Inc. for the amount of $489,150.20. SUMIA Y: This bid invitation was sent to thirty-two contractors' and twenty-five bids were picked up. We received tehn bids as shown on the tabulation sheet. The two low bids for asphalt were $489,150.20 and $497,031.00. The two low bids for concrete were $510.318,50 and $613,324,30. See attached memorandum which states that the low bid for asphalt is under our estimate. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet Memorandum - Jerry Clark PROGRAMS, DEPART14ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Capital Improvements Funds FISCAL 111PACT: Tkese is no additional impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. arreli City Manager Prepared by: .Johr. J. Marshall, C.P.M. / itle" purchasing Agent' Approved: 7ohn J. Marshall, C.P.N. ~''..?lilts :_pw~r!t~i iraa.~►a.~tt I I I I I I I r I I BID Il 9656 1 JAODE I J. L, I APAC I TEXAS I ATKINS 1 TISEO I CALVERT i BOB I JAY-MAR 1 AUSTIN BID TITLE NORTH LOCUST ST P & 0 1 PUBLIC I BERTNRAM 1 TEXAS I BITULITHIC 1 BR01HER9 I PAWNS I PAVING ; MOORS 1 CORPORATION I PAYING OPENED 11/7/86 2101 P.M. I CO. ;CONSTRUCTION i INC I INC. I I I ACCOUNTI I I CD. I I 1 1 i 1 I 1 I ! I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 h_..._...._..1------------- I...........--I-....----...._I------------- ' ---..-.__....1 -I------------ I QTY 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENUOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR i.,..._- i-------------I-_._._---...-1...-------._.._.._.__._._.._ ._._........--I------------- 1 I 1 i I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1. I 101 i TOTAL ASPHALT 1 587,262.85 1 NO BID I 616,343.61 I NO BID 1 49 9,151.21 1 NO BID I 491,131.15 1 622,326.51 1 566,161.32 1 613,881.11 1 I I ; I I I I 1 1 1 ; I i I i ; I I 1 I 1 1 2. 1 LOT I TOTAL CONCRETE 1 NO 010 1 6221165.19 1 NO BID 1 682,311.98 1 NO DID 1 613,324.31 1 511,318.51 1 Q BID I NO BID I 615,ft t I I I I I r I I I I I I I bid bond I yes I Y06 I yes 1 yes I yes I yes I yes 1 yes I yes i yea 1 I I r I I I I I 1 I I I r 1 I I I 1 I I I I i 1 i I 1 I I I I r I 1 I E I i 1 I 1 I I I r C/TY of DMON DMXTONt TMXAS TORO! MEMORANDUM DATE: October 13, 1986 TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent PROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Bid #96569 Locust Street Paving and Drainage We have reviewed the low overall bid of Atkins Brothers on the Locust Street Project. Their bid of $489,150.20 is almost $100,000 under our estimate for an 8" road. All line items, seem reasonable with no mistakes evident. The savings of 20,000 of asphalt over concrete seems enough to further L3tify approval of the Atkins Brothers bid. Please submit the bid for approval by council on October 21, 1986. Call if questions arise. 0Q6--~ J r VEne k, P .E. Gar U418E OUT '14 198 CITY OF `'DENTON ~ ~ DEPT. o9~3r. N0. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVI`ES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EZVNPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding $101000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate stoney to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Or6inances requires that the City Council approve all expenditurf~s of more than $10,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, nr to preserv the property of the city, or to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE OkUER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT 7S735 General Electric Company 190230.00 75742 Thermo Tech, Inc. 16,662.00 75803 Xerox Corporation 1200043,00 SUCTION U. That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated employee is hereby authorised to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services as descrihvtd In the attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the requirements of Competitive bids. SECTION 111. That this ordinance shall become effective iamedl.ately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 21 day of OCTOBER , 1966. CITY SOP DFE.ft," FXAB MUM CHARLOWE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO MAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITE ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: 1 198a DATE: October 219 CITY COUMCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: ONE SOURCE/EMERGENCY P.O./ 75735 - GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. RECONNE TION: We recrA mend this emergency Purchase Order M 75735 to General Electric Co. be approvr;d in the amount of $19,230.00, This emergency Purchase Order is for the use of a technical sere ceman to inspect and supervise the maintenance and overhaul of the N3 steam turbine. This is a one surce technical service that we have received in the past under these same conditions. The expected time and amount is detailed on the Purchase Order, as an estimate. Unless there is a major problem, the amount stated wo,ild cover the project or be less, BACKGRW: Purchase Order PROM NAM v DEPARTM ATS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Utilities - Electric Production FISCAL. IMPACT: Acct.ll 610-080-0251-8339-E510 There is no additional impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. arrell City Manager Prepared by., i ame: ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. Tit W. Purchasing Agent Approved: t \ 0 J. Marshall, C.P.M. PWrC asi t , 1014 RAAS ST11W IURCHAW OROM Doffom, Tx 76901 P.O. NUMiER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT 1 75735 10/11/06 305 GEN7350U VENDOR SHIP TO: GENERAL ELECTRIC CnMPANY CITY Of DENTONg 8101 S'TEMMONS FRFeWAY ELECTRIC PRODUCTION Poo* UOX 225821 1701-A SPENCER ROAD DALLAS• TX 73222-5821 DENTON• TX 76205 . 61D/REf >s ITEM ACCOUNT NUMIER UNITS NUMSIR DESCRIPTION SID NO. LINE AMOUI 011 610 080 0251 3339 11510 30 DAYS FEES TECHNICAL SERVICEMAN 186480.01 011 610 060 0251 S339 5510 SUP11RVISE03 TURBINE GENERATOR 03 610 090 02MI 8339 9510 MAJOR INSPECTTON 6 OVERHAUL 04 610 060 0961 8339 15510 30 DAYS TRAVEL 750.0! The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • Hcuse Bill No. 20. TOTAL FAf2 p.0. a Reference P.O. Number on alt B/L,Shipments and Invoices Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as indicated. By Send Involoss TO: DOW Inquiries TO., City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaer, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent (or as Indlestod on Purohas. Order) 617/661:•6311 D/FW Metro 267.0042 The Cite of Dental is an equal opportunity employer DATE: October 21, 1M f CITY MIL ILEPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: EMERGENCY P.O.# 75742 _ THEO= TECH, INC. RECOMMENDATION: we recommend approval of this emergency Purchase Order to Thermo Tech, Inc. for the amount of $16,662.00 for the removal of ceiling asbestos insulation at the Water Plant. SUMMARY: The removal of asbestos from public buildings and facilities has veen a very important topic for the past several years. It must be removed and properly disposed of before we can start to work on Phase II expansion of our Water Treatment Plant. For this reason we are presenting this as an emergency agenda item. Purchase Order B~fA ,RJ,R : Memorandum - C. David Ham Proposal - Thermo Tech, Inc. I,;:.urance Certificate PROGRAMS, DEPARTIENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Utilities Department Expansion FISCAL. IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the Genrai Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. rell City Manager Prepared by: T!t~le,PurchasingrAgent' C.P.M. Approved: ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. . s `Tit, ti~u !1a t. 9014 TVA SnW FURC HAN OMM 01WON4 TX 16201 P.O, NUMBER DATENENDOR NO. DOCUMENT T 7374$ 101!!!x4 319 ! TNt~S8001 ~ • I VENDOR SHIP Tot THERl40 ; T!►CHr INC. UTILITY ADMINISTRATION 12787 FEAT11914WO7D OR*. 215 6 ""I"Nl1Y 6"MT 80ITiS 125 DENT00#0 TB!XAS , 76201 HOUSTON9 TX 77034 BIO~REI'. ~ tTEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNI AMOUR 01 623 008 0460 5101 1 :ASBESTOS RKWWAL AT WATER. 16466904 02 623 006 0460 9101 TREATMENT PLANT r 1. . 1 I ! Tho_ City of Denton, Text is tax exempt • House 8111 No. 20, YOTAIM PMR P Reference P.0, Number on all B/L,Shlpments and Invoices Shipments ore 11,019. City of Denton, or es Indicated, By Sand Invoices TO:' Direct Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Psynble John J. Mai shall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. McKinney At., Denton, TX 76201 Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M. Met. Purchasing Agent (or as indicated on Purchase Order) 617/566.8811 0/FW Metro 26'1-0042 The City if Denton is on equal opportunity employer q ~ CITY OF aSNTON Y71Llri N2 K 0 R A N 0 U M rrw.rrrrrrwr wr rw rr r.•ar+rrrwwrw.w......rr.rrrrrrr wrr r.rwr r.rrr.~w.rrrrr..ww......w r TOt John Marshall, Purchasiny Agent` FROM: C. David Hans, Assistant Director of Utilities DATES September 18, 1986 SUBJECT: Asbestos Removal at Water Treatment Plant Enclosed please find the proposal for removing asbestos at the Water Treatment Plant roof ceiling. The proposal is from Th9rmo Tech, Inc., Houston, Texas. This work has to be accomplished before the Phase II expansion can start, which is scheduled to begin in three months. Additionally, the work is very special in nature and only a few companies have '.he required insurance and approval from EPA. Due to these reasonings, it is requested that it be approved as an emergency and special work, and be awarded to Thermo Tech, Inc:., Houston, Texas. Please advise me for further clarification. CDH:gb Enclosure cc: R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities Howard Martin File SEP 2" 1986 CITY OF UENJON PURL ONG DEPT. n V 'T XT, r. ~ r "Mm ftbo Int. 12rt/ R..rMrwood dM • wM. t!e • ►lowaa 1Mw rnu • CM) 4WW FAX (rM MW*M September 5, 1986 TT2-Q86-3551. City of Denton 215 E. McKinney St. Denton, TX 76201 Attention: Mr. Howard Martin Reference: Asbestos Removal Office 1 S 2 Entry Corridor Control Room Back Lab, Stair Well Lecture Room and Office 3 City of Denton Water District Gentlemen: Thermo Tech, Inc. is pleased to submit it's proposal to furnish all supervision, labor, material, tools, equipment, supplies, scaffolding, warehousing, and on site facilities necessary to properly remove the asbestos on the ceiling for the above referenced project, as follows. We have examined the area by our Mr. Mikes Stevenson. The scope of work as defined within these documents is the basis of this proposal, except as otherwise clarified within this quotation. (See Clarifications) This proposal is for your acceptance for thirty,,, (30) calendar days from the above dates of this proposal, and is based on the assumption that one contract will be awarded for all labor and material on the entire project, as shown in our pricing section. The prices quoted are firm and therefore are not subject to adjustment for changes in labor and\or material cost..through December 30, 1986. i t ~f City of Denton TTZ-~Q86-3551 Asbestos B Val City of Denton Water District Page 2 Total Lump Sum 6160662.00 We appreciate the opportunity extended to us, to be of service to your company and sincerely hope our prices, terms and conditions merit your full consideration in the award of this contract. We have endeavored to submit a proposal as responsive and comprehensive as possible. Should you have any questions pertaining to it, please do not hesitate to contacot this office. Very truly yours, THERMO TECH, INC, 9J. 4r. Munson Projects Manager JFM/ nt City of Denton TTY-Q86-3551 Asbestos Removal Water District CLARIFICATIONS A. Commercial 1. Our proposal is based on performing the work utilizing an eight (8) hour work day, five (5) days per week. However, should it be necessary to employ more hours to maintain the given schedule through no fault of Thermo Tech, Inc., a price adjustment will be required. 2, our prices are based upon providing Thermo Tech's total package insurance coverages. A certificate describing this coverage is in attached brochure (occurence). 3. Thermo Tech, Inc. will indemnify the owner and/or contractor against losses or damages only in cases which are solely due to our negligence. Contractor and/or other subcontractor, must obtain written permission from Thermo Tech, Inc. before utilizing any scaffolding, erected or not, and/or any equipment belonging to or rented by Thermo Tech, Inc. 4. Thermo Tech, Inc. will not be responsible for any services or work performed by others, without documented authorization by an on-site representative. 5. At the present time, Thermo Tech, Inc. does not intend to subcontract any portion of this contract, other the mentioned above, however, should we elect to do so, we would obtain permission from your project Manager. City of Denton TTZ-Q86-3551 Asbestos Removal Water District Page 2 B. Technical 1. Our price includes the insulation of all welded or bolted joints, should we have to leave welds or bolted joints open to facilitate testing and cleaning, we would charge this portion of the insulation and jacketing at the hourly rate attached. 2. We have assumed that an adequate clearance has been provided for the insulation thickness required for piping through grating, next to structural memebers, other piping, etc., so as to eliminate the necessity of trimming or reducing the insulation thickness or the shape of the weatherproofing. 3. Additional supports, clips etc., installed in the field and not shown on drawings will have to be charged as an extra. 4. Our price does not include any piping below grade, protective pipe saddles, or insulated pipe shoes. 5. This proposal is based upon all piping remaining at ambient temperature and in a nonoperative condition while insulation is being applied. 6. our price does not include any fireproofing, painting or wFilding. 7. Our price includes ceiling asbestos only and clean up of all areas involved. Iwt IMr /Mt a1M M a~MMrf eel meM aerM / I Muhq tiNlM MIN• ~ {~ANIO A1~ OOYAS~ AATMA JL OAU ACHIN i 00, (Bermuda U P•0. 902 1000 A Rutual Indearit Led. Rami2ton 3o iermuda i / %mtford Ins w ce Caowry 1e Me ASKES 0 *0000 40~ SRA.4Z INSV&ATZ(WS INC. C 1450 Renaissance briva sw. 0 Park Rides. IL 60068 u~w ' E ti N is aauly tMum" d leww►w Im" it(" Mw b"m i/sum w us 1"mmd and mwe am am 4 hm • frs ow ~Iq !1q N I~MMMrI ie~Nt Millrel ~ ain M~IN{1 lls' 401.16 w». A • z~t.d indsmity P:Ucy 3-1-87 a r awn.t ~*t always to Ole rstN.w..aw terbna and oon!litiaes of 1MArtw "WON"" ~ PONW N• wMw~ ■ra telimeku IMA MI m wm m ' 1 ~r Mai M%imm too S MR. w.Mw. Ulder Kwer Auto only 3-1-87 ~ 5,000 51,000 ~ WW - flfr ~,Nw YYIIAI' ssestos Abatement Liability Coverage ~NUti awr at rr aMw NfW" M #0614f bm" to wind" do wftlf, Ia/W~11 will sub" I's "0 minmornm ~ 10 WON 1rad ~ • 11 WOO bU ~aWf Mart raw* chill loom IM w l"U sNl «.w • u1 DATE: October 21, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: EMERGENCY/ONE SOURCE P.O.! 75803 - XEROX CORPORATION RECOMENOATION: We recommend this Purchase Order be approved to Xerox Corporation for the preventive maintenance of our duplicating equipment for one year in the amount of $20,043.00. SUMMARY: The City of Denton owns or has on lease/purchase a total of five Xerox duplicating/copy machines. The required maintenance of these machines is provided by Xerox at the Government rate and we have received this service all this time. This is a one source service/maintenance. The maintenance on this type of electronic equipment is necessary and this service is not offered from other sources, BACKGROUND: Purchase Order PROGRAMS, DEPART1+ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All departments of the City operation FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Working Capital Item 710-043-0582-8341 Respectfully submitted: L1o d V. rrell City Manager Prepared by: alai ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. Tit1 .Purchasing Agent Approved: a~i: John J. Marshall, C.P.M. it •Purchas#n nt WY OF DENT N, TEXAS 901.11 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201 P.O. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT 75803 10/11/e6 Cl 6 xER46000 VENDOR SHIP TO: XEROX CORPORATION CENTRAL STORES P.O• BOX 11985 CONFIRMATION ONLY SANTA ANA9 CA DO NOT DUPLICATE 92711 BID/REF. N ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOU! 01 710 043 0592 R34t 12 MN MAINTENANCE 3600/840-101996 3*000001 02 710 043 0582 8341 12 MN MAINTENANCE 104s/C40-129987 10020001 03 710 043 0582 8341 12 MN MAINTENANCE 1048/C40-129329 975001 04 710 043 0582 8341 12 MN MAINTENANCE 1075/CSM-111334 49656.0( 05 71A 043 05E92 8341 12 MN MAINTENANCE 1078/C55-107973 4.392.0( 06 710 043 0582 8341 12 MN MAINTENANCE 9500/685-014295 60000.Oa i The City of Denton, Texas is tax exempt • House BIII No. 20. TOTAL FOR P.O. 20.043000 Reference P.O. Number on all B/!.,Shipments and Invoices Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. By Send Invoices TO: Direct Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom 0. Sh$W, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent (or as indicated on Purchase Order) 817/688.8311 D/FW Matto 287.0042 The City of Denton is an equal opponunlty employer DATE: 10/21/86 CM CauglL REPO" rgaw TO% Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJR(T: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AND SRRVICR PLAN ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY 132.64 ACRES OF LAND BRING PART OF THE 0. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330, AND PART OF THE W. DURHAM SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 300, AND BEGINNING AT A POINT APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE SOUTH OF F.M. 426 (EAST MCKINNRY) AND ONE AND OUR-HALF MILES NORTH OF I.H. 359 (A-37) RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission rsoommends approval of the annexation as submitted. SUWABX : The property in this request is owned by the Corps of Engineers, and the annexation petition was precipitated by the need to have all land that will be affected by the proposed mayor thoroughfare for the proposed Lakeview Development annexed within the City of Denton, The Parks and Recreation Department requested annexation of additional property for their planning purposes. The City of Denton is the petitioner of this proposed annexation. AfiCKGROUND: Not applicable PROORAMS, DgPARTMRN' OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton, Corps of Rngineers, Miller of Texas, Ina. FECAL IMPACT: Undetermined Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Ha ell_ Prepared by: City er A~A1J~ David Ellison Senior Planner Appro i Jeff Meye Director of Planning and Development 1626a iL NO. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 132,64 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BRING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330- AND PART OF THE W. DURHAM SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 300, DENTON COUN~Y, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a request for annexation for the property described in Exhibit "A", a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of The City of Denton, Texas; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the 'V412S day of A v s f- 1986 in the Council Chambers for all- interes a persons o state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the /~9I4T day of ~4vn.,s* 1986 council Chambers present evidence bearing Interested to state provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has boon published in full at least one ties in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW9 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS., SECTION I. That the tract of land described in said Exhibit "A" be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other citizens of said city and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear Its prorate part of the taxes levied by the City. SECTION it. The property described in Exhibit "A" is hereby classified as Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION III. Should any section or part of this ordinance be held u ineffective nconstitutional, illegal or invalid, or the application thereof tutionality,oillegalityl Invalidity any ineffectiveness of such A-37/CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS/PAGE ONE section or part shall in no wise affect, impair or invalidate the remaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such remaining portion or portionz, the some shall be and remain in full force and effect; and should this ordinance for any reason be ineffective as to any part of the area hereby annexed to the City of Denton, such ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any effectipart or veness ofa this oordinance such to all shall of the tremaffect ainder the such area, and the City Council hereby declares it to be its purpose described oinnsaid tExhibit Ci"All of Denton nordinance, art of the regardless area whether any other parr of such described area is hereby effectively annexed to the City. Provided, further, that if there is included within the general description of territory set out in Section I of this Ordinance to be hereby annexed to the City of Denton any lands or area which are presently part of and included within the 11mits of the City of Denton, or which are presently part of and included within the limits of any other City, Town or Village, or which are not within the City of Denton's jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby excluded and excepted from the territory to be hereby annexed as fully as if such excluded and excepted area were expressly described herein, SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Introduced before the City Council on the _J_.. day of 5ep4e"i ve r 1986. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of 1986. RAY STIMIR CITY OF DENTON, PEA' AS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECIEMY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY; L~ A•37/CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS/PAGE TWO EMISIT All that Certain lo., tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the v, walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and Abstract ]30, Denton County, Tax u, part of the W. Durham Survey, And mono Particularly described as follow r st"MM3N0 At a point in the peasant city 1[mits as established by Ordinance No, 05-210, Tract 1, said point also lyin4 Dorms Survey, ease being in the west bounder the east boundary line Of the 0. Walker Surv♦ poise also being a U.S, Army Corps Of engineers Monuswnt p-250 wlino vo the W. Y, said THENCE South 19. 05, east along said peasant city limits passing at 1,116.57 fast the Southeast corner of said Tract 3, continuing for a total distance of U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers Kanuaent V_2 N1 TM;NCE Southeasterly Along the U.S, Army corps of engineers Boundary the following six 14) Courses and distances, (1) South 10 441 east, 12340 foot to a U.S. Army Corps of Englnoors Monument P-252+W, {2) weac, 690.0 lest to a U.S. Army Corps.of Snginoars Monument P-2S3.N Army Corps of engineers Konumant p-154-W, (I1 wee) South, 420 teat to a U.S. Corps on engineers Monument P-255-W) (5) So tf 196,0 test to a U.S. Army Point [or corner, said polo! being a U.E, South 3! 3S cost 622,4 loot to a p--W, (,6)ArmSoutyhCor Sps Ss 211 Seat, 562.a IoatmtoCArPoint toe cornlro said point bei2n3g6 a tl,s o! Engineers Monument P-257-W, TNENCE South 34a 461 S9' West c90181n9 the Corps Tract and the Pocon Crook Pork of Lake Lewisville, a distance of 943.71 foot to a point toe corner, point being a U.S. Army Corps of tnginj,ors Monument P-234-W, Bald TNeNCS Northwesterly along the U.S. ArAy Corps of engineers boundary the following sixtoon (14) courses and distances, (1) North $04 101 West, 177,5 fast to a U'S, Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-1JS.W, (2) South $20 We'at, 244,D fast to a U,S, Army Corps of engineers Monumen! Month 211 /S west # North w # 10162.1 feet to a U.S. ArmC neersW, (4) North 67' 431 wasl, 310,04 foot to & U, S, Army Monument tngineers Monument p-23S,W, (51 South 02• IS, West, 236.4footrto atU.S. Army Corps Of Engineers Mo;idaent P-239-Wl (6) South 40 351 west, 556.5 toot to a U-S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-240-W, (7) North 3s• 59, Most, 1,140.5 foot to a U1,84 Army Corps of 5B tngineers Monument P-241-w, (S) South • 12, Wast1672.9 test to a U.S. Army Corps at Engineers Monument P-242-W, (9) North $S• SI1 Nast, $47.2 toot to a U.S, Arty Corps of Engineers Monument P-243-*j (10) North 170 12, West, ]41.1 feat to a U,S. A•my Corps of Englnaera Monument p-244-", (11)North 279 411 test, 1e4,7 toot to a U.S, Army Corps of tngineers Monument P-245-W# (12) South So SI1 east 932.1 last to a 44, Army Corps of tngineers Monument P-246-W, (13) North sit $9/ easy 665.0 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers MOnL„ant P.217-W, (14) North O1~ SI' east, 15340 foot to a U.S. Army Corps of engineers Monument P-246-W, 115) East, 1,164.1 feet to a U.S, Army Corps of engineers Monument P-249-N1 (10) North 000 241 Meat, 45.5 feet to the point of beginning and containing 132.64 acres Of land. I A-37 PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the propoHod annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: I. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas. E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation, (2) Routine maintenance on the sang basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvement's, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompai;s the annexed area. 1. Street Lighting; (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city. J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power, Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plaa is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. (2) Imp,%ct un the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the cfty. E t "JA • ' ll'r 1 Si ~ ~ r+~ Lo *d I Aw3 o' r\ ; pf ~ ~I ! SHADY si Sri op Q 7"MORU~F#~Ann Polopawry ri -f-71 1 ~~y U 1 7 IIQ1lS~ Lowi.vILLE LAK■ A~ A-37 ANNRXATtON SCHEDULE July 7, 1966 Submit City Council agenda item July 9, 1986 Submit agenda back-up * I.-July 15, 1986 City Council sets date, time and place toe public hearing July 22, 1986 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle L--July 25, 1986 Publish notice and mailout &--'July 28, 1986 Submit City Council agenda item ✓July 30, 1986 Submit agenda back-up for City Council * August 5, 1986 City Council holds first at regular meeting public heating ✓August 6, 1986 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle ,August a. 1986 Publish notice and mailout '~Auqust 11, 1986 Submit City Council agenda x'August 13, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission makes recommendation ✓ August 13, 1966 Submit agenda back-up ✓ August 190 1986 City Council holds second public hearing at regular meeting ,i August 25a 1986 Submit city Council agenda item August 27. 1986 Submit agenda back-up *(September 9. 1986 City council institutes annexation proceedings at special called meeting -~'September 11. 1986 ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle September 14a 1986 Publish ordinance October 13, 1986 Submit City Council agenda item October 14, 1986 Submit city council agenda back-up * October 21, 1986 Final action by City Council at regular meeting * Denotes action by the City Council 09648 .x Ml nut as Planning and Zoning Commission September 10, 1986 ifte regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton Texas was held on Wednesday, Sepptember 10, 19861 at 5:00 p,m., In the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building. Present: Hullne Brock, BJ11 Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr., Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt and William Kamman Absent: None Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey; Urban Planner; Cecile Carson Urban Planner Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; David Salmon, CivN Engineer; Srini Sundaremoorthy, Civil Engineer; Martha Davidson, Planning Assistant; and Susan Mitchell, Secretary Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order. I, MINUTES: It was moved by Mr, Escue, seconded by Ms. Cole and Hififa"ously carried (7-0) to approve the minutes of the special called meeting of August b, 1986, It. CONSHNT AGENDA: It was moved by Mr, Escue, seconded by Mr, 41iscck and unanimously carried (7-0) to approve the consent agenda as follows: A. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the New Place Addition, Block A, B. Approval of preliminary and final plat of Ronnie Brae Point, Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. ill, ANNEXATIONS A. A-37. Proposed annexation of approximately 132.64 acres or-land being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and part of the W. Durham Survey, Abstract No. 3000 and beginning at a point approximately one mile south of F.M. 426 (East McK)nney) and one and one-half miles north of I.H. 358. 5'fa/PN REPORT: Mr, Ellison stated that this annexation Is being requested by the City of Denton for property that is awned by the Corps of Engineers. He said that the precip- itating factor was the need to have all land that will be affected by the proposed major thoroughfare for the Lake- view development annexed within the City of Denton. He said that the Parks and Recreation Department requested annexation of additional property for their future plan- ning purposes, He said from the standpoint of impact of services there is none for the City. He said that the staff does not make recommendations on annexations Mr, Holt asked if this annexation would have an ad- verse effect on the city if Lakeview did not develop. Mt. Ellison said no. Ms. Brock asked if the Corps of Engineers had any objec- tions to the annexation and If they knew about the annex- ation. Mr. Ellison stated that they are notified as a courtesy and the staff has heard no objections. Ms. Brock asked If there Is any other Corps property in the city limits. Mr. Ellison said yes north of Highway 380 and that this annexation would no! set a precedent. He said that the city has had no official problems as a result annexing Corps property. J P 4 2 Minutes September 100 1986 Page 2 BCISIUNr Ms, Brock moved to recommend approval of A-37 an stated that this annexation Is very appropriate and right at the place where a park could develop. Seconded by Mr, 133cue and-unanimously carried (7-0). B. A-41. Request of Tommy Corporation for annexation of approximately 23,6420 acres of land being part of the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and beginning adjacent and north of Edwards Road appproximately S mile east of Mayhill Road and approximately S mile west of Swisher Road, STAFF REPORT: Mr, Ellison stated that this is a voluntary anne~Ton request by the Tommy Corporation for the purpose of developing the pro arty in accordance with the City of Denton's standards, He said a petition for mingle family (Sir-7) zoning has been submitted in conjunction with this annexation request, He said that a 60.8 acre tract of land adjoining this parcel to the west was annexed and zoned planned development (PD) for mixed residential land use In January, 1986 at the request of the Tommy Corporation. He said that no population is affected and the only impact on city services would be to the fire department if they had to respond to a grass fire, He said that farther west alongg the west and of Edwards Road there is a specific use pars it for a mobile home park. He stated that the one propert ownor that was contacted had no objections to the annexation. Ms. Brock asked about the 17 feet of perimeter street pav- ing, Mr. Ellison stated that perimeter paving with curb and gutter would be required with developers part of tract and the city would participate in 7 feet to total a 24 foot section of improved road for this development, He added that the other side of the road would be improved when the property developed, Mr. Holt asked if the balance of the road would be unim- proved, Mr. Ellison said yes until others developed or a Capital Improvement Program is designated for this area. Ms. Cole asked about the extension of the 12 inch water- line, Mr. Ellison stated that it is the developer's responsibility. Mr. Holt asked about an oversize agreement. Mr. Ellison stated that the ordinance says depending on fund avail- ability the city may enter into an oversize agreement if approved by the City Council. Mr. Claiborne asked If there was an Improved road to this property, Mr. Ellison stated that it is mostly unimproved, Ms. Carson stated that it Is Improved along Edwards Road abutting the mobile home park, Mr. Ellison stated that there would not be a complete road from Mayhill Road to this site. Ms, Brock stated that this is a more appropriate matter at zoning but that the road is a very serious matter. Mr. Claiborne stated that the city must assume maintenance if annexed. Mr. 13111son stated that prior to the mobile home park de- velopment the road and utilities were very poor in this area but Improvements have been aide since the construc- tion of the mobile home park. r ;ty 5 NEW DATE: October 21, 1986 CITY COUMCIL RBPORT FORMAT 1.00: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 8UHJECT: ORDINANCE INCREASING THE FEE FOR THE DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSES TAUUH'T AND ADMINISY'ERED BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DA'Z'E. RECUMMENDATION: To increase the present fee from $15.U0 to $20.00 per student. SUMMARY: In order to keep pace with inflationary costs of teaching the course, the fee of $15 should be raised. Certification cost have increased twenty-five (25%) percent, and we also anticipate an increase in film rental fee cost. BACKGROUND: Presently, the City of Denton features the lowest fee for the Defensive Driving Course in the four (4) county area. For at least the past year, most other agencies charged twenty ($20) dollars and some charged as much as twenty-five ($25) and thirty ($3U) dollars per student. Since fees for certification have increased from $2.00 to $2.50 per student, and film rental is increasing an unknown amount this fall, it behooves the City of Denton to keep pace with the minimum amount of $2U. FISCAL IMPACT: We project that the new rate will increase revenue by approximately thirteen thousand five hundred ($13,500) dollars. This additional revenue will assist the Defensive Driving Fund in meeting its commitment to transfer $57,000 to the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V, arrell City Manager Prepare by: Har3an L. erson D.uministr t ve Assistant pproved: ohn F. McGrane Director of Finance HLJ: of 1429F NO, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PEE FOR DBFBNSIVE DRIVING COURSES TAUGHT I,ND ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND PRO- VIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: US ION I, That a fee of Twenty Dollars ($20.00) shall be charged to each person enrolling in the Defensive Driving Courses taught and administered by the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION IIy That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS ATTEST; CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: l i '✓o & G rp DATE: 9- l 5-86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: ECONOMIC DEVELCPMENT OFFICE CONTRACT RECOMMENDATION: Staff pecommends that the City Council consider the adoption oa contract in order to establish an Office of Economic Development to be administered by tht Denton Chamber of Commerce, SUMM AR Y: This contract will create an agreement with the Chamber which will create an office cf Economic Development. The City agrees to provide one-third (1/3) fundinu. This financial arrangement is renewable on an annual basis. BACKGROUND: Resulting from the Economic Development Task Force research and recommen a ion in partial fulfillment of one of the City Council goals, this contract has been prepared for consideration by the City Council in order to establish an Office of Economic Development at the Chamber of Commerce. The purpose of this office will be,to encourage and promote economic development and industrial growth in Denton, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED, The Utility fund will provide the necessary funding, FISCAL IMPACT; $339438 Rio specttti IIy subrnlttea: 4eTil re Lloyd Harra , C i ty Manager n oar Brya t Assista Administrative nt Ap ed: Name *Stant Title Ass y Ma nager 1616L NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE DENTON CHAMBER 00 COMMERCE PROVIDING FOR A PROGRAM TO PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That the attached agreement between the City of Denton and the Denton Chamber of Commerce providing for a Program to Promote Economic Development is hereby approved. SECTION II. That the expenditure of funds in accordance with the Agree- ment is hereby authorized. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of~ 1985. RA? STEPRENS, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLENt CITY SECRETUT CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITC110 CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DhNTON9 TEXAS BY: 1(1 ~,-v,n 1616E THE STATE OF TEXAS S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON COUNTY OF DENTON S AND THE DENTON CHAMBER OF COhNERCE This Agreement is made between the City of Denton, Texas, ("City"), and the Denton Chamber of Commerce ("Chamber") for the purpose of providing for a program to promote economic develop- ment through the joint effort of the parties hereto, who, in consideration of their mutual promises, agree as follows: 1. Office of Economic Development Created. During the term of this Agreement, the Chamber s a create and maintain an Office of Economic Developpment. A Director of Economic Develop- ment ("Director"), shall be hired as a full-time employee of the Chamber to perform the duties of the Office. 2, Economic Development Committee Created. In order to promote a program or economic eve oilmen , he parties agree that an Economic Development Committee ("Committee") will be established. The members of the Committee, who shall represent the diverse interests of the community, shall be appointed by the Chamber's Board of Directors, but shall include one member of the City's Public Utility Board, two members of the City Council and two employees of the City, as designated by the City. The Committee shall approve the appointment of the person to serve as Director of Economic Development, and act in an advisory role to the Direct+:r apoointPa. 3. Duties of Office. The duties of the Office of Economic Development s a nc u e the following: a) Preparation, in consultation with the Committee, of a written comprehensive Economic Development Plan ("Plan") to be approved by the Chamber's Board of Directors and City Council, b) Annual review and amendment, as necessary, in consultation with the Committee, of the Plan, To become effective, any amendments to the Plan shall be approved by the Chamber's Board of Directors and the City Council, c) Maintenance of a liaison with the Texas Industrial Commission and other public and private agencies and organizations that would promote the purpose of the plan. d) Preparation and maintenance of a comprehensive fact book and other publications that would provide information to Interested persons as to the City's population, employment base, private and public iustitutions and facilities, and other significant characteristics and resources of the City, e) To initiate and maintain contact with, and make presentations to, desirable industrial prospects so as to promote their interest in locating within the area. f) To advise the City of the progress of the Plan at such times'as requested by the City. To this end, the Office will provide monthly program reports to the Chamber Executive Committee, the Board of Directors and the City Council. Quarterly reports that include the sources of expenditure of funds, major projects, number of industrial prospects who visited Dentun and industries locating in Denton will be presented to the Denton City Council, Public Utility Board and such other groups as the parties may determine. 4. Support Services and Funding. The Chamber shall provide the office space, equipment an support staff necessary to the operations of the Office of Economic Development. The City shall, during the first year of this Agreement, provide funding in the amount of Thirty-three Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-nine Dollars ($330439)0 when, and if, matching funds from other public or private sources in the amount of Sixty-six Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-six Dollars ($66,876) or more, are provided to the Office of Economic Development. Thereafter, the City shall provide annual funding in the amount appropriated for that purpose by the City Council. Any funds provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be retained in an account separate from the Chamber's general operating fund and shall only be used for the purposes provided for in this Agreement. The Office of Economic Deve- lopment shall keep current and accurate records of all funds received and expended, which shall be subject to inspection by the City at all reasonable times. A monthly financial statement showing all current revenues and expenditures of the Office shall be provided to the City. 5. Status of Office. The Office of Economic Development created Under this greement shall be under the direct super- < vision and control of the Chamber and all personnel of the Office shall be considered employees or agents of the Chamber. The Chamber shall be responsible for the payment of all benefits or liabilities of such employees or agents, including the PAGE 2 rKn: NONE withholding or payment of personal income or social security taxes, as provided by applicable law, and the payment of workers compensation premiums. The Chamber shall maintain policies of insurance in the minimum amounts required by law to protect against liability arising from the operation of any vehicles used by employees of the Office and the Chamber agrees to defend against, and indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim arising from any negligent act of such employees. 6. Term; Termination. This Agreement shall be effective for a term of one (1) y -ear from the execution hereof, and shall be automatically renewable for successive period of one year with- out the necessity of any action on the part of the parties hereto, unless during any successive term, the City shall, after the initial funding provided for herein, fail to appropriate funding for any successive year, in which case this Agreement shall terminate. In any case, however, either party may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the other thirty (30) days advance notice, in which case any unexpended funds provided by the City shall be returned to the City. Executed this day of 1986. RAY-STEPHENSO A CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLER CITY SECUTARY CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: DENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BY: PAGE 3 7! DATZ: 10/31186 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Joella Orr, Library Director SUBJECT: Implementation of $10 Per Day Fine for Overdue Videocassette Players. RECOMMENDATION: The Denton Library Board recommends the approval of a $10 per day fine for overdue videocassette players. This amount is the minimum amount set by the North Texas Library System for member libraries making use of the videocassette players made available through funding from the Texas State Library. BACKGROUND: The Emily Fowler Public Library is a member of the North Texas Library System, one of ten libary systems which are governed by the Texas State Library, and through which state funds are received. The Texas State Library has recently made two videocassette players available to member libraries in order to make the videocassette collection available to patrons, and also to allow staff to check for damaged tapes. Loan periods may be determined by the system member library; however, the overdue charge must be at least $10 per day in order to participate in this program, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Library department is the only department that will be directly affected by the circulation of the videocassette players. They will be available for check out by department heads and staff, subject to current Library policy and procedure. The circulation of the videocassette players will make the videocassette collection available to all patrons that own a television. FISCAL IMPACT: THERE IS NO IMPACT ON THE GENERAL FUND Respectfully submitted: :11 Joel~ Orr, Library Director Prepared by: 'eaa Cathie I:riok, Sr. Sacretary Approved: qt kp~ k A Yetty c cn se s y r. I~ 7r, Sr,7 16OBL NO. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES VOR THE EMILY FOWLER PUBLIC LIBRARY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, SECTION I. That the Resolution passed and approved by the City Council on January 18, 1983, setting fines for overdue books and materials for the Emily Fowler Public Library is hereby amended as follows: 1. Non Residents of Denton County An applicant who is not a resident of Denton or Denton County, but who is a permanent resident of an adjoining County may be issued a library card with full privileges upon payment of an out-of-county fee in the amount of Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) per year beginning with the data of application. 2. Fines a.id overdue Charges Fines for overdue books, record albums, vertical file materials, will be ten cents (10¢) per day, fines for tape cassettes, video games, polaroid camera, art prints and sculptures will be one dollar ($1.00) per day, fines for overdue due video cassette recorders will be ten dollars ($10.00) per day and fines for microcomputers will be twenty dollars ($20.00) per day exclud- ing Sundays and holidays. SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986, RAY S EPHE , AYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: ~ C M E M O R A N D U M TO: BETTY McKEAN, ASSIS'TAN'T' CITY MANAGER FROM: JOELLA ORR, LIBRARY DIRECTOR SU[3J: APPROVAL OF DINES FOR VCR USE DATE: September 30, 1986 Tho Library has received two video ctasaotte recorders from tho North Texas Library System. They are to be usod in-house to check damaged video ctarar+ettos and/or be circulated in order to make the video cassette collection available to patrons. The Denton Library Board has directed me to ask the City Council to approve tho overdue fine for the failure to return the v',deo cassette recorders at ton dollars ($10) per (lay. This amount is the minimum amount gat by the North Texas Library System in its video equipment gui.del.inos to member libraries. Attached you will find a cop; of the Library Board minutes of the meetings in which this issue was discussed and the recommendations made, along with a copy of the contract to be signed by the Library patrons, and a copy of the guidelines to be used by the staff in handling the circulation of the video cassette recorders. The Board would appreciate this being placed on the first convenient agenda for City Council approval. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. C, 14-- j- Joe Orr, Library Director ci 0887H attne)imonto DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY VCR CIRCULATION CONTRACT accept full responsibility for the use of the Denton Public Library's video cassette recorder. I agree to accept the responsibility for seeing that any person, myself included, has read the instructions for using the video cassette reoorder and has a good working knowledge of the proper operation and care of the machine while it is in my possession. I understand that the overdue fee is $10 per day and I agree to pay this fee for each day or part of each day that I keep the machine past the date it is due back at the Library. I understand that the responsibility for damage rests with myself, and that I am responsible for any charges for the costs of repair and replacement (plus shipping and handling). date name (patron number address phone number FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THE TERMS OF THIS CONTRACT MAY LEAD TO FUTURE LOSS OF PRIVILEGES AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LIBRARY DIRECTOR. 0886H 011586 rev093086 DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY VCR CIRCULATION PROCEDURE 1. Video cassette players have been made available through our membership in the North Texas Library System. 2. Video cassette players will be used in-house to check damaged video cassettes as needed. 3. Video cassette players will be circulated when not needed for in-house checking of damaged video cassettes in order to make the video cassette collection available to all patrons. 4. Video cassette players may be borrowed by any person 18 years of age or older who possesses a val'd library card with the Denton Public Library. 5. Loan periods will be for two (2) days or one (1) weekend. 6. The overdue fine will be ten dollars ($10) per day. 7. Video cassette players will be returned to the Circulation desk during library hours and the patron will bo responsible for any and all overdue fines at this time. 8. The patron will sign a contract stating that the borrower is responsible for the borrowed equipment and will pay for the cost of repair and replacement (plus shipping and handling) should any equipment be lost or damaged while in their charge. The Library will be responsible for routine care and maintenance of the equipment. 9. Neither the Library, the City of Denton, or the North Texas Library System will be responsible for any damage incurred to the patron's software or hardware. 0886H n T ~.T,aS~a'=°~" ~+~'"•'~~=•rors+: ,r r•.. > fir. e + -~r ~Ne NOR"111 •1'f.XAS HHRA.RY SYS]VM Ncninp Ilie Noilh I':rlti l,n mio of \Irlivi, Il;ryln. L'hildu•ti, (hq, ('nnlc. lkvuuu, 1101111, luurd. 1111n1alu+nl, Ilnod, IdrA, Ilirr,un. 41inlnl'nc, 11;111: I'mio. P.11k 1, Nolllrlvlll. 1.111,0111. 1\illl;ul•ci, Wiu. Widdla, Yourlu. NTLS VIDEO OBLIGATION FORM The following guidelines will be incorporated in some form in our NTLS system contract; 1. These videocassette players are to be circulated by the member libraries in order to make the videocassette collection available to patrons, and also should be used to check for damaged tapes. 2. The videocassette player may be borrowed by any person 18 years of age or older who possesses a valid local library card in good standing and who has completed the contract Materials and Equipment Agreement. 3. Loan periods will be determined by the system member library. Overdue charge for videocassette players will be $10.00 per day. 4. The system member will require that all users return the equip- ment to a designated point during library hours within the specified loan period or pay and and all overdue fines. 5. The system member will be responsible for the maintenance of borrowed system equipment and will pay for the cost of repair and replacement (plus shipping and handling) should any materials or equipment be lost or damaged while iri their charge. 6. Neither the system members or NTLS will be responsible for any damage incurred to the library patrons software or hardware. RECEIVED AUG 121966 ' 44 CITY OF UFNTOrI DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY Main Office (817) 335.61176 IN N. University, Stille 232 PH in Service (817) .335.6090 Pori Worth, Texas 76107 DENTON LIBRARY BOARD March 27, 1986 The regular meeting of the Denton Library Board was held in the Board Room of the Emily Fowler Public Library on Thursday, March 27, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. PRESENT: R. Hutton, chairman; S. Lockhart; D; Speck; A. Lookabaugh; L. Gonzalez, R. Stephens and J, Orr. ABSENT: None 1. Approval of minutes. Al Lookabaugh moved, Lupe Gonzalez seconded, that the minutes of the January 23, 1986, meeting be approved as read. Motion carried unanimously. 21 Reading Interest Survey. A copy of the "Reading Interest Survey" conducted by Dr. Gregory tuck's Public Library class from North Texas University was distributed. The survey was conducted to establish the reading interests of the library patrons. Patrons were asked what type of material they used in the library and also in what areas of the collection they would like to have more material purchased. The survey revealed that the 'Library has a very satisfied clientele and strong support amon6 {ts clientele. The survey showed that the material in greater demand by the patron is heavily book oriented and that magazine use is relatively high. The survey revealed that the largest user group for the adult collection is from 26 to 39 years of age and that the library is serving its largest possible user group. This survey showed that current fiction was chosen most often with the specific areas of mysteries, romance and science fiction the top three choices. In the non-fiotion categories, history ranked first, 'followed by health and medicine, and biography, A letter of thanks to Dr. Zuck, expressing appreciation for the survey will be sent on behalf of the Library Board. 3, Transaction fee. The Board suggested a maximum of two days check out of the portable video cassette recorders, or a weekend check out period. No further word has been received from the System in regards to obtaining the recorders, however. 4, Texas Library Association Conference. TLA will be held in Frrt North, April 8 - 11. Joella and several of the professional staff will be attending different functions. Library Board membere are welcome to accompany library staff to the conference if they wish to attend. 5. Old business. A letter of resignation was read from Victoria Roberts, dated October 7, 1985, and just recently received at the Library. Victoria submitted the following two names to be considered for replacement: Mary Jane Barnett and Glenda Broughton. Al Lookabaugh moved, Lupe Jonzale7, seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. J DENTON LIBRARY BOARD January 23, 1986 The regular meeting of the Denton Library Board was held in the Board room of the Emily Fowler Public Library on Thursday, January 23, 1986, at 700 p.m. PRESENT: Rodney Hutton (ohairman), Al Lookabaugh, Lupo Gonzalez and Joella Orr. ABSENT: Ray Stephens (ex), Sarah Lockhart (ex), David Speck (ex), Georgia Caraway (ex) and Victoria Roberts. 11 Approval of minutes. Al Lookabaugh moved, Lupo Gonzalez seconded, that the minutes of the October 24, 1985, meeting be approved as read. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Resignation of Georgia Caraway. Rodney Hutton read a letter from Georgia Caraway and the Board accepted her resignation with regrets. 3. VCR Circulation Policy and Contract. The Board reviewed a proposed VCR circulation procedure and contract recommended by the North Texas Library System for the possible acquisition of video cassette recorders to be made stocessible to the public. The Board asked that steps be taken to obtain approval of the ten dollar ($10) per day overdue fine required by the Texas State Library for institution of this service. Lupe Gonzalez moved and Al Lookabaugh seconded the proposal to have this item placed on the City Council agenda for approval. 4. Space Needs Report. The Board members reviewed a report prepared by the Library staff for the Parks and He Department on loLg term space needs and a report prepared for the City Manager's office on the Lakeview Impact. 5. Quarterly Report. The Board members reviewed the Quarterly Report prepared for the Assistant City Manager. Based on the figures in this report, the Board advised that the video cassette collection be built up quickly using the percentage of use increase figures in the report. There being no further business, Lupo Gonzalez, moved, Al Lookabaugh seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p,m, DENTON LIBRARY BOARD February 27, 1986 The regular meeting of the Denton Library Board was not held in February. The Library Board hosted a reception for the new City Manager, Lloyd V. Harrell, along with past members of the board. r i r M t , OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor $ Members of the City Council Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager Charlotte Allen, City Secretary FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney SUBJECT: Official Newspaper DATE: October 8, 1986 Both state law, in Article 1025, V.A.C.S., and Section 14.03 of our City Charter provide that the City Council shall annually select and designate the official newspaper of the City in which all ordinances and official notices shall be published. The Legislature has defined the term "newspaper" in Article 28a (2), V.A.C.S,, which provides: (2) The term "newspaper" shall mean any newspaper devoting not less than twenty-five percent (25i) of its total column lineage to the carrying of items of general interest, published not less frequently than once each week, entered as second class postal matter in the county where published, and having been published regularly and continuously for not less than twelve (12) months prior to the making of any publication mentioned in this Act, except that an weekly newspaper shall be allowed to omit two (2~ publication issues in twelve (12) months and still retain its status as a newspaper eligible to make any publication mentioned in this Act", As we generally use the Denton Record-Chronicle to publish our notices and ordinances, I recommend that this be formalized and attached for your consideration is a resolution designating a newspaper. When a motion to adopt the ordinance is made, the movant should state the name of the newspaper, Should you have any questions relative to this matter, please advise. Respectfully submitted, L Y, /IP n ,DEBRA A, DRAYOV DAD:js Attachment 11 R E S 0 1 U T I O N WHEREAS, Section 14.03 of the Charter of the City of Denton provides that the City Council shall annually select and desig- nate the official newspaper of the City in which all ordinances and official notices that are required to be published shall be published; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby designates and appoints the as its official newspaper. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY N , MAYOR~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLENx CITY R TAR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: ry DATEt 10/21/06 CITT COWCrL ARM MM T0: Mayor and Ksmbers of the City Council PRAM: Lloyd Harrell, City Kaaager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DISPOSITION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 10 AND 11, MEADMROOK SUBDIVISION (D-39) PSCOK£MATIOIi: The Development Review Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission recooend approval of the disposition. This property was transferred to the City of Denton on July 23, 1975 by the Denton Loan and Investment Company as part of a drainage easement. The easement is no longer required and the Development Review Committee sees no additional public need for the land, The Planning and Zoning Commission accepted the findings of the Development Review Committt* and recommend disposition at its meeting of September 24, 1986. BACKGROUND : This disposition was considered in 1985 but incorrect lot numbers were listed in the official documentation. PROOMM, DKPARTKKWTS OR GROUPS AYlECTE : City of Denton and individuals that will bid on the sale of public property if disposition in approved. FISCA IKPACT: Undetermined. Respectfully submitted: G?L.LC Prepared 'by: Lloyd Ha 1i , wWj City N!s er C_ David Ellie-in Senior Planner Appro Jeff lbra Director of Planning and Development 1602s ~ t ,:t rl f!a 1' 1`:' c d7J o Y!^,'r-d: re "h: i, i,S ti` CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: October 21, 1986 SUBJECT: Disposition of public property described as Lots 10 and 11, Meadowbrook Subdivision SUMMfARY: This is a tract of 0.462 acres situated north of and abutting Windsor Drive and west of Sherman Drive and more fully described, as Lotkp and 14 as shown in the Meadowbrook Subdivision, City of Denton. This tract of land was transferred to the City on July 23, 1975 by the Denton Loan and Investment Company as part of a drainage easement. The easement is no longer required for the proper use and development of land in this area. The existing City easement on-site would need to be abandoned before disposition of the property can be effected, This property disposition was approved by the City Council in 1985. The incorrect lot numbers were listed in the official documentation. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the disposition. RECOMMENDATION: The Devwlopment Review committee determined that this property is no longer suitable for public purposes and recommended approval of the disposition. The Planning and Zoning commission recommended disposition at its meeting of September 24, 1986. ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny disposition of Lots 10 and 11, of the Meadowbrook Subdivision. ATTACHMENT, Reduced map David Ellison Senior Planner 06578 f 041P 40 1 f M.. MN Nn • . ♦ M A q/y MAO voY r MI .YNI M♦M f3 N a Or e o 10 0 'Jti• w NJ • rtiw .ti. ~,A M i P. t• 48 5 ~ II (1 A • "t + P lot 4 a o r JAO*~ 1 M w . IU. 4 a !0 ; .44 .i 1 00 •~.pN /I r r,y at 10 t 11 a ~y}1 J, / N b yu~ r !'frh3 I / +i 10 .1 1 4 1 l r'4 r y . Al a MEADOWBROOK SUBDIVISION' JOHN GARrFR SVRV(Y luli'I CARL~ SURVE r AYS1 RAI,r r.'.I ASS fRACr 1(AV ' AN 4001 floM ro rue cirt or MN fON, rI IAq ' O(YfON lOAM ANO !NY(l rMflSr COMPANY oWf.(R ~ {LOCO C, D. MONN WARMAN Anb 'MtlIw1Y( 6u4014 1 t ' Ow NI r3 OLUI Y. A C !ol A inu ~ { I W C PAPMIMI Omoml for I IB M% Y l CL . I P t Kiputes Septesber 21, I946 Page 2 STAFF REPORT: Ns, Carson stated that thm City Council, at its eet ng o September 16 1946, had granted a variance of water low requirements for fire protection purposes. She said that the replat meets the tequirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations on all other rounds and that the Development Review Committee recommends approval. P TI IONER: Dan Trammel, attorney representing Harry T. Riney, state tit he was available for questions. IN FAYI)R: None present. OPPOSED: None present. 1 Chair declared the public hearing closed. \ DECISION: Mr, Kansan moved to recommend appruval of the ?eTiminary and final replat of the Original Town of Denton Lot 2, Block 33, Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (7-0), IV, CONSIDERATION D-39. Request for disposition of city property described as rot- 10 and it, Meadowbrook Subdivision. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that this is a small tract Mated "wesf of Sherman Drive in the Meadowbrook Subdivision, She said that the land was originally trap furred to the City as part of a drainage easement. She state that the City Council had approved the disposition in 194S but the lot numbers had been listed incorrectly as 9 and 10 instead of 10 and 11. As a result of this error the City is redoing the disposition process for this property. She further stated that there is no need for the easement and the abandonment of the easement will not cause a hardship for the City, The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Mr, Claiborne asked if the west side of Lot 10 had an open channel. Ms. Carson stated that there is an area that has drainage but she was unsure If it is a dedicared easement. Mr. Claiborne stated that there is surface drainage down Bluebonnet and that the City might need to retain a drainage easement if there is not a pipe system In place. Greg Edwards, Metroplex Engineering, stated that the Capital Improvements Program had previously installed a pipe system and made drainage improvements In the area, Ms. Carson stated that there is an existing easement on Lot 9. Ms. Cole moved to recommend approval of D-39. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (7-0). Meeting adjourned at S:3S p.m. r ~u