Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-07-1986
City pr OULIA)CI Dc ~)Leo ~l 19 B l~ F 4 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 7, 1986 'l'our by the City-of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 7, 19869 at 1:13 p,m. to begin from th« City Hall parking I,)t at which the r following item will be considered: 1:15 P, in. i. Conduct a tour of the Loop 238 and Kings Vow area and receive status reports on zoning, development anA streets, work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesdovi October 7, 1986, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m. 1. Receive a report from Black and Veatch on the Lewisville Lake hydroelectric project. 2. Receive a report on the proposed Certificates of Obligation for the Det.ton Municipal Airport. 3. Hold a discLssion on the use of $25,000 in City funds from the RecrW.icn Fund to match funds solicited by the Denton Tennis Association for development of an office and restroom at the Tennis/Golf Center, (The Parks and Recreation Board recommends approval.) 4. Review of proposed electronic vol ing procedures for the City Council. S. Discussion: of s"aff reorganization in various City departments, 6. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters ,lnder Sec. 2(e), Art, b252-17 V.A.T.S. B, Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.A,T,S. L', Personnel /Board Ap c;intments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6'252-17 V,A,T.S. see item MS above) Regular i'vieeting of the City of D.inton City Council on Tuesday, October 71 1986, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p,m, 11 Presentation of charitable donations to Friends of the Family, Denton SPAN and Denton YMCA by the Southland Corporation, 2, Presentation of safety awards for the City of Denton from the National Safety Council and Texas Safety Association. Tf- City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Two 3, Appearance by Mr. Carl Williams to discuss Police Officers working as security guards while still in City of Denton uniform. 4. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 1, 1986. 51 Public Hearings: A. Z-1810. Petition of bill Foster requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classikication and approval of a detailed plan, including the preliminary plat of the Bill Foster Addition, Lots 1-4, Block A, on a 4.5 acre tract located on the north side of FM 1173 approximately 800 feet west of the I-3S North service road. The property is more particularly described as a tract in the B.B.S. and C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 141. If approved, the planned aevelopment will permit the construction of a four lot light industrial development. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 10 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a • change in zoning and approval of a detailed plan on a 4. S acre tract located on the north side of Fm 1173 approximately 800 feet west of the I-35 North service road. b, Z-1822. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, Trus*see, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-10 (SF-10) on 29.356 acres. The property is located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and B. hl. Rogers Survey 1101, If approved, the property may be utilized far any purpose permitted in the SF-lU district, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 29.356 acres located 2,500 feet west of FM 2191 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road, C. Z-1823, Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, Trustee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-10 (SF-10) on 13.410 acres, The property is located 4,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and B, M. Rogers Survey 1101. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the SN-10 district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Three . 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 13.410 acres located 4,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road. U. Z-1814. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn ufi c~ker, Trustee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-7 (SF-7) on 156,044 acres. 'the property is located 2,500 feet west of PM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the B, M. Rogers Survey 1101, J. Rogers Survey 1084, and J. Rogers Survey 1085. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose allowed in the SF-7 district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 156,044 acres located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road, B. Z-1828. Petition of Metroplex Lngineering requesting an amendment of an existing planned development and approval of a detailed plan, including the preliminary plat of Country Club Place, Lot 2, Block A, on an 18.543 acre tract located at the southeast corner of Fbl 1830 (Country Club Road) and Hobson Lane. The property is further described as a tract in the T. Martin Survey, Abstract 900, if approved, the amendment will permit the development of 220 attached residential units with a density of 11.9 units per acre► (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment of an existing planned development and approval of a detailed plan on an 18.543 acre tract located at the southeast corner of FM 1830 (Country Club Road) and Hobson Lane. F, Z-18330 Petition of j,V, Strange, representing eas ey Road Associates, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classification and approval of a concept plan oa a 50.5 acre tract located at the northeast c"•ner of Kings Row and Loop 288 (currently under construction). The property is further described as a tract in the J, Coltart Survey, Abstract 288, and the D, Culp Survey, Abstract 287, If approved, the planned development will permit the following land uses: City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Four Single Family Detached - 9.78 acres 27 units on minimum 10,000 square foot lots with a density of 3.4 units per acre Single family Detached - 31.5 acres 112 units on minimum 7000 square foot lots with a density of 4.4 units per acre General Retail - 7.7 acres Park - 1.47 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning and approval of a concept plan on a 50.5 acre tract located at the northeast corner of Kings Row and Loop 288, 6. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items B.A, 8.B, 8.C). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid N 9631 - Loop 288 utility crossing 2, Bid. N 9643 - Utilities Loop 288 30 inch waterline 3. Bid M 9647 - Water meters 4. laid N 9650 - CIP Utilities, Section f (water line improvements to Joyce Lane, Windsor Drive, Bell Avenue, Mingo Road and Westway Street) 5, Bid 0 9651 - Participation Flolbert-Wyatt waterline 6. Bid N 9653 - Bare copper/power cable 7. Bid 0 9b55 - Painting of Peach Street water tank 86 Bid 0 9658 - Printing of parks and recreation brochures City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Five 9. Bid # 9663 - Ambulance remanufacture 10. Purchase Order Y 75177 to Southern Hydroflow in the amount of $13,569.14 ' 11. Purchase Order 75209 to J$C Equipment Co. in the amount of $13,566.48 12. Purchase Order 0 75320 to J4S hquipment Co. in the amount of $14,092.25 13. Purchase Order N 75600 to Handar in the amount of $'22,845.00 B. Replats: 1. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the north one-half of Lot 2, Block 33, Original Town of Denton Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Change Orders and Final Payments: 1. Consider approval of Change Order 02, Bid N 9550, Water Treatment Plant upgrade (Phase 1), Boswell Company, to reduce the contract amount by $2,68'Z.54 and consider final payment to the contractor. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 2. Consider approval of Change Order 01 and final payment to Dickerson Construction Co., bid N 9667 for 1986 CIP State School water line. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) D. Tax Refunds: 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for K&M Enterprises in the amount of $1,161.55. 7. Consider approval of Bid 0 9654 for janitorial. service. 81 Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Six C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. D. Consider adoption of ordinance to amend the schedule of fees for zoning activities. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving Bid 0 9610 for the Lewisville Lake hydroelectric turbine generator. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) P. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing residential and commercial garbage collection charges. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing Article III of Chapter 13 (Health and Sanitation) of the Code of ordinances relating to massage establishments. H. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing Article III of Cnater 14 (Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions) OF the Code of Ordinances. I. Consider adoption of ail ordinance establishing rates fo.r the rental of aircraft hangar and tie-down space owned by the City of Denton and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into contracts for the rental of such property, (The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.) J. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting U turns on U. S. Highway 38J (University Drive) at its intersection with Hinkle Drive. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) K. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting the parking of vehicles on the east and west sides of Bonnie Brae Street from its intersection with Scripture Street to its intersection with Bonnie Brae Street between the hours of 10;00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) 91 [resolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing publication of notice of int4ntion to issue Certificates of Obligation of the City of Denton, Texas for airport improvements. B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the City to reimburse Arco Pipeline Company for relocaating ' ipes within right-of-way of Loop 288 as per contract between the City and the Stage. `city of Denton City Council Agenda ti October 7, 1986 Page Seven C. Consider approval of a resolution naming members to the Denton Committee for the Bicentennial of United States Constitution, lu, Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 110 New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B, Real Estate C. Personnel Board Appointments 134 Discussion of pending litigation against the City Including Gladden versus the City of Denton, Maverick Aircraft versus the City of Denton, and Okoli versus the City of Denton. 14. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V,A.T,S. (see item M 13) B. !teal bstate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 62S2-17 V.A.T.S, C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S, C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin Poard at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on t day of 1986 ' Y o'clock PP , m. s' 23970 k{ AGbNDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 7, 1986 'l'our by the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 7, 1986, at 1:15 p.m, to begin from the City Hall parking lot at which the following item will be considered: 1:15 P.M. 11 Conduct a tour of the Loop 288 and Kings Row area and receive status reports on zoning, development and streets# work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 70 1986, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 P.M. 1. Receive a report from Black and Veatch on the Lewisville Lake hydroelectric project. 2. Receive a report on the proposed Certificates of Obligation for the Denton Municipal Airport. 31 Hold a discussion on the use of $2S,000 in City funds from the Recreation Fund to match funds solicited by the Denton Tennis Association for development of an offico and restroom at the Tennis/Golf Center. (The Parks and Recreation Board recommends approval.) 4, Review of proposed electronic voting procedures for the City Council. 5. Discussion of staff reorganization in various City departments, V. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, b252-17 V.A,T.S, N. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A,T,S, L. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A,T,S. (see item M5 above) Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 7, 19860 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Presentation of charitable donations to Friends of the Family, Denton SPAN and Denton YMCA by the Southland Corporation. 26 Presentation of safety awards for the City of Denton from the National Safety Council and Texas Safety Association. City of Denton City Council Agenda •Uctober 7, 1986 Page Two 3. Appearance by Mr, Carl Williams to discuss Police Uficers working as security guards while still in City of Denton uniform. 4. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 1, 1986. 5. Public Hearings: A. Z-181b. Petition of Bill Foster requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classitication and approval of a detailed plan, including the preliminary plat of the Bill Foster Addition, Lots 1-4, Block A, on a 4.5 acre tract located on the north side of FM 1173 approximately 80u feet west of the I-35 North service road. The property is more particularly described as a tract in the B.B.B. and C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 141. If approved, the planned aevelopment will permit the construction of a four lot light industrial development. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning and approval of a detailed plan on a 4.5 acre tract located on the north side of Fm 1173 approximately 800 feet west of the 1-35 North service road. S. Z-1822. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, Trustee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-10 (SF-10) on 29.356 acres. The property is located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 ('Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and B. M. Rogers Survey 1101. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the SF-10 district. (Tne Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 10 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 29,356 acres located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road. C. Z-1823. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, Trustee, requesting a change in zoning from agriculture1 (A) to single family-10 (SF-10) on 13.410 acres. The property is located 4,SUO feet west of Fhl 0 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and B. M. Rogers Survey 1101. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the SP-10 district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Three 0 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 13.410 acres located 4,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road. D. Z-1824. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, Trustee, requesting i change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-7 (SP-7) on 156.044 acres. The property is located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the B. M. Rogers Survey 1101, J. Rogers Survey 1084, and J. Rogers Survey 1085. If approved, the property may be utilized for any puk,pose allowed in the SF-7 district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 156,044 acres located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south r;f Hickory Creek Roa,i. E, Z-1828. Petition of Metroplex Engineering requesting an amendment of an existing planned development and approval of a detailed plan, including the preliminary plat of Country Club Place, Lot 2, Block A, on an 18,543 acre tract located at the southeast corner of FM 1830 (Country Club Road) and Hobson Lane, The property is further described as a tract in the T, Martin Survey, Abstract 900. If approved, the amendment will permit the development of 220 attached residential units with a density of 11.9 units per acre. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment of an existing planned development and approval of a detailed plan on an 18.543 acre tract lccated at the southeast corner of FM 1830 (Country Club koad) and Hobson Lane. F. Z-1833. Petition of J.V. Strange, representing Teasley Road Associates, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development RU) classification and approval of a concept plan on a 50.5 acre tra%,t located at the northeast corns of Xings Row and Loop 288 (currently under construction), The property is further described as a tract in the J. Coltart Survey, Abstract 288, and the U. Culp Survey, Abstract 287, If approved, the planned development will permit the following land uses; City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Dour i Single Family Detached - 9.78 acres 27 units on minimum 10,000 square foot lots with a density of 3.4 units per acre Single Family Detached - 31.5 acres 112 units on minimum 7000 square foot lots with a density of 4.4 units per acre General Retail - 7.7 acres Park - 1.47 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) I . Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning and approval of a concept plan on a 50.5 acre tract located at the northeast corner of Kings Row and Loop 288. 6. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. . Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items B.A, 8.80 8.C). This listing is provided on the Consenr Agenda to allow council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Urders: 1. Bid # 9631 - Loop 288 utility crossing 2. Bid M 9643 - Utilities Loop 288 30 inch waterline 3. Bid 0 9647 - Water meters 4. bid 0 9650 - CIP Utilities, Section F (water line improvements to Joyce Lane, Windsor Drive, Bell Avenue, Mingo Road and Westway Street) 5. Bid 0 9651 - Participation Holbert-Wyatt waterline 6. Bid 0 9653 - Bare copper/power cable 7. Bid 0 9655 - Painting of Peach Street water tank 8. Bid N 9658 - Printing of parks and recreation brochures City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 • Page Five 9. Bid # 9b63 - Ambulance remanufacture 10, Purchase Order 0 75177 to Southern HYdroflow in the amount of $13,569.14 11. Purchase Order 0 75209 to AS Equipment Co. in t1..) amount of $13,566.48 12. Purchase order 0 75320 to JO Equipment Co. in the amount of $14,092.25 13. Purchase Order # 75600 to Handar in the amount of $22,845.00 B. Replats: 1. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the north one-half of Lot 2, Block 33, Original Town of Denton Addition. (Tho Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Change Orders and Final payments: 1. Consider approval of Change Order N2, Bid w 9550, Water Treatment Plant upgrade (Phase 1), Boswell Company, to reduce the contract amount by $2,682.5:; and consider final payment to the contractor. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 2. Consider approval of Change Order #1 and final payment to Dickerson Construction Co., did N 9667 for 1986 CIP State School water line. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) D. Tax Refunds: 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for K$M Enterprises n the amount of $10161.SS. 7. Consider approval of Bid 0 9654 for janitorial service. 81 Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. 71 City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Six C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive hids. D. Consider adoption, of ordinance to amend the schedule of fees for zoning activities. E. Consider adopption of an ordinance approving Bid N 9610 for the l.ewisvil.le Lake hydroelectric turbine generator. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) H. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing residential and commercial garbage collection charges. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing Article III of Chapter 13 (Health and Sanitation) of the Code of ordinances relating to massage establishments. H. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing Article III of Chapter 14 (Offonses and Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Coda of Ordinances. 0 I. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing rates for the rental of aircraft hangar and tie-down space owned by the City of Denton and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into contracts for the rental of such property. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.) J. Consider adoption: of an ordinance prohibiting U turns on U. S. Highway 380 (University Drive) at its intersection with Hinkle Drive. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) K. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting the parking of vehicles on the east and west sides of Bonnie Brae Street from its intersection with Scripture Street to its intersection with Bonnie Brae Street between the hours of 10:0U p.m, and 6;00 a.m. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) 91 Resolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing publication of notice of intention to issue Certificates of Obligation of the City of Denton, Texas for airport improvements. B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the City to reimburse Arco Pipeline Company for relocaa}ing pipes within right-of-way of Loop 288 as per contact. between the City and the State. City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Seven Cl Consider approval of a resolution naming members to the Denton Committee for the Bicentennial of United States Constitution. 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. ill New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters 81 Real Estate C. Personnel ll. Board Appointments 130 Discussion of pending litigation against the City including Gladden versus the City of Denton, Maverick Aircraft versus the City of Denton, and Okoli versus the City of Denton. 14. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. (see item N 13) B. keel Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec., 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I F I C A T E 1 ce:(:ify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin b and at the Ci Hall of the City off. Denton, Texas, 9n {p.m. day of~ , 198 o'clock 239.."C AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 7, 1986 'Pour by the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 7, 19860 at 1:15 p.m. to begin from the City Hall parking lot at which the following item will be considered: 1:15 P.M. 10 Conduct a tour of the Loop 288 and Kir,gs Row area and receive status reports on zoning, development and streets. work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 71 1986, at 5:30 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m. 11 Receive a report from lack and Veatch on the Lewisville Lake hydroelectric project. 21 Receive a report on the proposed Certificates of Obligation for the Denton Municipal Airport, 3. Hold a discussion on the use of $25,000 in City funds from the Recreation Fund to match funds solicited by the Denton Tennis Association for development of an office and restroom at the 't'ennis/Golf Center. (The Parks and Recreation Board recommends approval.) 4. Review of proposed electronic voting procedures for the City Council. 5. Discussion of staff reorganization in various city departments. 6. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.'C.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A,T, S. (see item 05 above) Regular Meeting of the City of Denton Cif•y Council on Tuesday, October 7, 1986, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 11 Presentation of charitable donations to Friends of the Family, Denton SPAN and Denton YMCA by the Southland Corporation. 26 Presentation of safety awards for the City of Denton from the National Safety Council and Texas Safety Association. City (%f Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 198tiN Page Two 3. Appearance by Mr. Car,: Williams to discuss Police Officers working as security guards while still in City of Denton uniform. 4. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 1, 1986. 5. Public Hearings: A. Z-1816. Petition of Bill Foster requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classification and approval of a detailed plan, Including the preliminary plat, of the Hill Foster Addition, Lots 1-4, Block A, on a 4.5 acre tract located on the north side of FM 1173 approximately 800 feet west of the I-3S North service road. The property is more particularly described as a tract in the H.B.8, and C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 141. If approved, the planned development will permit the construction of a four lot light industrial development.. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning and approval of a detailed plan on a 4,S acre tract located on the north side of FM 1173 approximately 800 feet west of the I-35 North service road. B. Z-1822. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn uT Re , Trustee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-10 (SF-10) on 29.356 acres. The property is located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of hickory Greek Road and shown in the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and B. M. Rogers Survey 1101. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the SF-10 district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 29.356 acres located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of hickory Creek Road. C. 7-1823, Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, Trustee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-10 (SF-10) on 13.410 acres. The property is located 4,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and B. M. Rogers Survey 1101. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the SF-10 district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 77' City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Three 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 13.410 acres located 4,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road. ll. Z-1824. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn 'tucke.r, Trustee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-7 (Sir-7) on 156.044 acres. The property is located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the B. M. Rogers Survey 1101, J. Rogers Survey 1084, and J. Rogers Survey 1085. if approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose allowed in the SF-7 district. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning on 156.044 Acres located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road. h* Z-1828. Petition of Metroplex Engineering requesting an amendment of an existing planned development and approval of a detailed plan, including the preliminary plat of Country Clu:. Place, Lot 2, Block A, on an 18.543 acre tract located at the southeast corner of FM 1830 (Country Club Road) and Hobson Lane. The property is further described as a tract in the T. Martin Survey, Abstract 900. If approved, the amendment will permit the development of 220 attached residential units with a density of 11.9 units per acre. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment of an existing planned development and approval of a detailed plan on an 18.543 acre tract located at the southeast corner of FM 1830 (Country Club Road) and Hobson Lane. F, Z-1833. Petition of J.V. Strange, representing Teasley Load Associates, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classification and approval of a concept plan on a 50.5 acre tract located at the northeast corner of kings Row and Loop 288 (currently under construction). The property is further described as a tract in the J, Coltart Survey, Abstract 288,, and the D. Culp Survey, Abstract 287. If approved, the planned development will permit the following land uses; City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Four Single Family Detached - 9.78 acres 27 units on minimum 100000 square foot lots with a density of 3.4 units per acre Single Family Detached - 31.5 acres 112 units on minimum 7UU0 square hoot lots with a density of 4.4 units per acre General Retail - 7.7 acres Park - 1.47 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) I. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning and approval of a concept plan on a S0.5 acre tract located at the northeast corner of Kings Row and Loop 288. 6. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thlareof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 8.A, 8.8, 8.C). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid M 9631 - Loop 288 utility crossing 2. Bid M 9643 - Utilities Loop 288 30 inch waterline 3. Bid 0 9647 - Water meters 4. Bid g 9650 - CIF Utilities, Section F (water line improvements to Joyce Lane, Windsor Drive, Bell Avenue, Mingo Road and Westway Street) 5. Bid w 9651 - Participation Holbert-Wyatt waterline 6. Bid N 9653 - Bare copper/power cable 7. Bid 0 965 - Painting of Peach Street water tank 8. Bid 0 9658 - Printing of parks and recreation brochures City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Five 9. Bid r 9663 - Ambulance remanufacti.!re 10. Purchase Order M 75177 to Southern Hydroflow in the amount of $13,569.14 11. Purchase order # 75209 to J$S Equipment Co. in the amount of $13,566.48 12. Purchase Order M 75320 to J$S hquipment Co. in the amount of $140092.25 13. Purchase Order 0 75600 to Handar in the amount of $221845.00 B. Replats: 1. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the north one-half of Lot 2, Block 33, original Town of Denton Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval ) C, Change Orders and Final Payments: 1. Consider approval of Change Orden #2, Bid 95500 Water 'T'reatment Plant upgrade (Phase I), Boswell Company, to reduce the contre,ct amount by $2,682.54 and consider final payment to the contractor. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval,) 2. Consider approval of Change Order wl and final payment to Dickerson Construction Co., Bid f 9667 for 1986 CIP State School water line, (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) D. Tax Refunds: 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for K$M Enterprises in the amount of $1,161.55. 7. Consider approval of Bid # 9654 for janitorial service. 81 Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award o£ contracts for public works or improvements, City of Denton City Council Agenda October 7, 1986 Page Six C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. D, Consider adoption of ordinance to amend the schedule of fees for zoning activities. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving Bid # 9610 for the Lewisville Lake hydruelectric turbine generator. (The Public Utilities board recommends approval.) N. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing residential and commercial garbage collection charges. G. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing Article III of Chapter 13 (Health and Sanitation) of the Code of Ordinances relating to massage establishments. H. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing Article III of Chapter 14 (Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Code of Ordinances. I. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing rates for the rental of aircraft hangar and tie-down space owned by the City of Denton and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to enter into contracts for the rental of such property. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.) J. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting U turns on U. S. Hi hway 380 (University Drive) at its intersection with Hinkle Drive. (The Citizen Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval. K. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting the parking of vehicles on the east and west sides of Bonnie Brae Street from its intersection with Scripture Street to its intersection with Bonnie Brae Street between the hours of 10:00 p.m, and 6:00 a.m. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support. Commission recommends approval.) 9. kesolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing publication of notice of intention to issue Certificates of Obligation of the City of Denton, Texas for airport improvements. B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the City to reimburse Arco Pipeline Company for relocaating gapes within right-of-way of Loop 288 as per contract. between the City and the State. City of Denton City Council Agenda October 70 1986 Page Seven C. Consider approval of a resolution naming members to the Denton Committee for the Bicentennial of United States Constitution. 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 11. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 12. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 13. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I F I C A T h I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1986 at o'clock (a.m.) (P.M.) 23970 SLACK & VEATC H ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS TEL. 19131339-2000 1500Me.ADOW LAKE PARKWAY MAILING ADDRe$S Ito. SOM No 6405 KAN$AS CITY, MISSOURI 64114 City of Denton, Texas B&V Project 10566 Lewisville Hydrolelectric Project B&V File 14.0200 Feasibility Review 41.0300 September 16, 1986 City of Denton Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Attention) Mr. R. E. Nelson Centlement Enclosed are two copies of revised Case 6 of the feasibility evaluation. This case is based on bonds at a rate of S percent. The following revisions have been made to the evaluation relative to the Case 6 transmitted with our letter of June 23, 1986. 1. The cost of spare parts, training program, and capacity/index testing has been added to the Turbine/Generator and Auxiliary cost. 2. A cost of $15,000 for a pump to boost the pressure of the water supply to the fish hatchery has been included in Miscellaneous Plant Equipment Cost. 3. A Corps of Engineers fee of 1 percent of Total Direct Costs for review of design and construction has been added to the Indirect Cost. 4. The average annual generation is based on operation 94.7 percent of the time. The previous analysis assessed a 5 percent ices of this generation for planned and forced outages. The evaluation has been revised to allow for planned outages during the 5.3 percent downtime. Forced outages have been included as 0.S percent loss of the average annual generation. S. Bond issue date is changed from October 10 1986 to November 1, 1986. 6. The FERC Fee has been increased from $I/MWh to $3/MWh to account for fees associated with headwater benefit costs as detailed in new rules issued in July 1986. •IACK • YEATC14 City of Denton 2 B&V Project 10566 Mr. R. E. Nelson September 16, 1986 7. The P.oyalty/Fee 02, which is the FERC administrative fee, has been increased from $1,160 to $10880 based on latest information from FERC, The results of the revised feasibility indicates that a positive cash flow can be achieved during all years of operation. Also enclosed is a Case 6A which estimates reduced energy and capacity costs that would result in absentially no income the first physical year of operation (the nine months of 1988) and positive cash flow thereafter. The determined values are 19.00 mill/kWh for energy costs and $12.90/kW-Mn for capacity costs. As did the feasibility evaluations transmitted by our letter of June 23, 1986, the enclosed revis►ad feasibility evaluation,' Indicate the project is feasible. Pleats review the enclosed and contact us if you have any questions. Very t ly yours, B VEAT H 1 D.6 Guuy4t SAAtrmi Enclosures cc: Mr, E. 8. Tullos bcct BAA, 9AA, WKC, RME, DFG, DML, JRy, MC, FILE i BVMCA City of Denton, Texas Projeetr 10366 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project Filer 41.0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6 September 16, 1986 Sheet 1 of 6 - Cost Data Costs Canting, Deprecia, FERC Account 11000 X Bases Remarka Aaltoesl 7CtRiaS■7etr,e s7leIIxaapxxaaa GaaLxaStx nnaaSCmme aaaCaai: .:tr tasCCgRdtasai4aetra~a Production Plant 331-Struct./Improvements Excavationibackfill 190 10 30 Powerhouse t9cj 10 30 332-Raser./Dams/Waterways Penstock & Access. 260 10 30 Tailrace/Stilling Basin 90 10 30 333-Water Wheels/Turb./Gen. Turb/Gen and Aux„ 1495 0 AC Not subj. to Escal. Turb/Gen installation 210 10 AC 3Z4-Access, Elect, Equip, 90 10 AC 335-Misc. Plant Equip. 115 10 AC Transmission Plant 35~ 5!ructr/1mprovoments -o "5.•-5'.ati0 0 Equipment 9 l0 AC 355-Polzs and Fixtures 2 l0 30 356-Overhead Conductors 10 3f, 337-Underground Conduit B 10 30 358-Underground Conductors 7 10 30 na=onsx== Subtotal Direct Costs 2,56ii Contingency 129 =aaa==aaa Total Direct Costs 21709 Indirect Costs 376 Not subj. to Escalr Escalation 99 AFUDC 0 =e3s~ese Total Project Costs 31184 41 %4 4 0 %4 ##0 #*1t#****4 4 4 4 16 11 ##%###*iF%k%#%%It It %#IF# Key Project Dates Indirect Ccsts,yr Cost Data Date 01-Jun-86 Licensing 0.4 Start Final Engineering 01-Jan-86 Engineering 810 Start Construction 01-Rep-87 Contt Mgt/Start 4.5 Commercial Uperation 01-Apr-88 COE Fee 110 Escalation During Consruction Appreciation Bases Annual Percentage Rate 4.5 AC a ACRS Interest During Construction MN = Level for NN years Annual Percentage Rate 0.0 Tax Credits Income Tax Rate,% 0 Investment,% 10 Other I% I1 ti BVMCA City H Denton, Texas Projects 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project Files 41,0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6 September 16, 1986 Sheet 2 of 6 - General Data Project Data sasnb:.massesabsasaaxxaaasaaacbssaaxssae Rated Project Cnpacity,kW 21799 Net Ave, Annual Gen,MWh 12,664 Dependable Proj. Capacity,kW 19306 First Year Generation,MWh 71158 Ave. Annual Generation,MWh 12,728 First Year Operation,lhonths 9 Force Outage Factor,''/. 99.5 Financing Data avsaaaaaebaeenaxbxe_cea_aaaaee_~xcmccac Reserve Fund,41000 329 Principal Repayment Equity Financing,% 0,0 5 Years at 2.0 Debt Financing,% 10010 Then at 4.5 Financing Fee,''/. 3.5 Wore i no Fund'WF! , i!+),}!1 i [ Gent rata Amount Ftnanced,11404 1 6Debt Term,Yrs, 25 Issue Date 01-Nov-86 Interast,APR 5.4 Revenue Data » easeaasc_ssca_eceacaxsxaaaacsnneeca=a . Interest on Unused Funds,APR 5.0 Energy Value,$/MWh 27,56 Level for I Years Thep Escalate at 5,0 X J Ca>>acity Value,t/kW-Mn 16.00 Level for 25 Years I Then Escalate at 0.0 % Operating aid Maintenance Data i azx,,x_acsasssacacaatcnaa.zzaaaxraacx_aa O&M £scalation,APR 5.4 First Year O&M Costs, 0,0 7. of Total Project Costs or S 501004 State/Local Tares, 0.0 7. of Total Project Costs or $ Insurance 0,6 % of Total Project Costs or S FERC Fee,V MWh 3.00 + Wear Escalate? no Royalty/Fee M i,S/MWh 1.00 + 4/Year 0 Escalate? yes Royalty/Fee A21$/MWh + V Year 1,880 Escalate? yes Project Admin,,3/MWh 0.0+) + t/Year 0 Escalate? no I f BVMCA City of Denton, Texas Projects 10366 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project f 1l et 41,0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6 September 16, 1986 Sheet 3 of 6 - Project Revenues Annual Energy Energy Depend. Capacity Capacity Total Ben. Value Revenues Capacity Value Revenues Revenues Year MWh t/MWh $1000 kW $/kW-Mn $1000 $1000 zaa==ante ==Max==,= .ca S.S~7~~ II~~==~~~~ C'GiC9 ~.iC9 CnasGC3a0 LS,GRRY.CiC A~C'6 SaCCL 1986 1987 1988 7,158 27.56 197 980 16.00 188 385 1989 12,664 28,94 366 11306 16,00 251 617 1990 129664 311,38 385 1,306 16100 251 636 1991 12,664 31.90 404 1,306 16.00 251 653 1992 12,664 33,50 424 1,306 16,00 251 675 1993 129664 35,17 445 1,306 16,(10 251 696 1994 12,664 36,93 466 1,306 16.00 251 718 1995 12,664 38.78 491 11306 16,00 251 742 1996 12,664 40,72 516 11306 16.00 251 766 1°Q' 1: ,fba aL, 541 06 16,1')1' 2J3 74 1948 12,664 44.89 569 1,306 16,00 251 819 1999 12,664 47,14 597 11306 16,00 251 848 2000 12,664 49,49 627 11306 16.40 251 878 2001 12,664 51.97 65B 1,306 16,00 251 909 2002 12,664 54,57 691 1,306 16.00 251 942 2i?'13 12,664 57.30 726 11306 16,00 251 976 21(14 12,664 60,16 '762 1,306 16,00 X51 1 013 2005 129664 63.17 800 1,306 16.06 251 1 051 2006 12,664 66,33 840 1,306 16,00 251 1 091 2007 141664 69,64 882 1,306 16,00 251 1,133 2008 12,664 7?, 12 926 1,306 16,00 251 1 177 2009 121664 76,78 972 11306 16.00 251 11223 2010 12,664 80.62 1,021 11306 16.00 251 1 272 2011 121664 84,65 1,672 11306 16, 00 251 11323 2012 12,664 88188 1,126 1,306 16.00 251 1,371, 2015 121664 1,182 1,306 16.00 251 1,43' 2014 12,664 97,99 11241 11306 16,00 251 11492 2015 12,664 102.89 11303 1,366 16.00 251 1,554 2016 12,664 108,04 1,368 1,306 16,00 251 f 619 2017 121664 113.44 11437 11306 16.00 251 1 ,687 BVMCA City of Denton, Texas Projects 10566 Lewisville Hyaroelectric Proj,,t Filei 41.0300 Hydra Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6 September 16, 1986 Sheet 4 of 6 - Project Expenses 0&M Taxes FERC Royalty Royalty Project Totrl Costs Insurance Fees Fees 01 Fees N2 Admin. Expe:is, Year $1000 $1000 $1000 41000 $1000 $1000 $1000 aem=ze¢nz nez=e=sa= a=a==as_n tSIIItQL=II= L=:=3aC=St 4SaC662== L==RlC4=A 6C9StC1;C 1996 1987 1988 38 14 21 7 2 0 82 1989 53 19 38 13 2 0 124 1990 55 19 38 13 2 0 127 1991 58 19 38 14 2 0 131 1992 61 19 38 15 2 0 135 1993 64 19 38 15 2 0 139 1994 67 19 38 16 2 0 143 1995 70 19 38 17 3 U 147 1996 74 19 38 18 3 0 151 1947 ;g 19 '9 19 (r; 1198 1q1 19 :B 20 U 161 1999 66 19 38 21 3 0 166 21)U0 90 19 38 22 0 172 2001 94 19 38 23 3 0 177 2002 99 19 78 24 4 0 184 2003 104 19 36 25 4 0 19() 2004 109 19 ~8 26 4 ) 195 2005 115 19 38 28 4 0 203 2006 120 19 38 29 4 0 211 2007 126 19 '.13 30 5 0 218 2009 133 19 38 32 5 0 227 J 2009 139 19 38 34 5 0 235 2010 146 19 38 35 5 0 244 2011 154 19 38 37 5 U 253 2012 161 19 38 39 6 0 263 2013 169 19 3B 41 6 0 27" 2014 178 19 38 43 6 0 284 2015 187 19 38 45 7 0 295 2016 196 19 38 47 7 0 307 2017 206 19 38 50 7 0 320 -7 -7 y AVKCA City of Denton, Texas Projects 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project Filel 41.0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6 September 16, 1986 Sheet 5 of 6 - Debt Service Begin. Princ. Int. on Debt Debt Int. on Net Debt Princ. Payment Princ. Reserves Invest. Unused t Service Year $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 aaacmxaax xtx_sesaa axaaneaaa asasean:: ===caw=s axaaxx=xe esaatzaaa aassaaexx 1986 31652 0 46 3,652 200 46 0 1987 31652 0 163 39452 21388 173 10 1988 3,652 73 183 11054 725 53 203 1989 31579 73 179 329 16 236 1491? 31506 73 175 329 16 232 1991 1,433 73 172 329 16 228 1992 31360 73 168 329 16 225 1993 31287 164 164 329 16 312 1994 31123 164 156 320 16 304 1995 21958 164 148 312 16 297 1996 21794 164 140 304 15 289 149' ,63r, 1E4 1'! 4b E° `?1 1998 21465 164 123 288 14 273 1999 21301 16.1 115 279 14 265 110 (1,) 2,137 164 107 271 14 258 2001 11972 164 99 263 13 250 2002 1,808 164 90 255 13 242 2003 1,643 164 82 247 12 234 2004 11479 164 74 238 12 226 2005 11315 164 66 230 12 219 2006 11150 164 58 222 11 211 2007 986 164 49 214 11 203 2008 822 164 41 205 l0 195 2009 657 164 33 197 10 187 2010 493 164 25 189 9 181? 2011 329 164 16 181 9 172 2012 164 164 8 173 9 164 2013 (0) (0) 0 0 (0) 2014 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 2015 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 2016 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 2017 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) i 9VMCA City of Denton, Texas Projects 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric project files 41,0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6 September 16, 1986 Sheet 6 of 6 - Income Analysts Annual Annual Operating Net Debt Net Draw on Net Revenues Expenses Income Service Revenues Debt Reser Cash Year $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 nascao==a a=oacxaa= =ae===ama =atasa=X= n=====e== ===a¢e=ea ncez=xsa= 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 0 0 0 15) (10) 10 0 1998 385 82 30.3 203 100 0 10i5 1989 617 124 493 236 258 0 258 1990 636 127 508 232 276 5? 276 1991 655 131 524 228 296 0 296 1992 675 135 54~) 225 316 U 316 199, 696 139 558 312 245 8 254 1994 718 14'1 576 304 271 8 280 1995 742 147 595 297 298 8 306 1996 766 151 615 289 326 8 3,14 5'97 79 1cc t' 1998 819 161 658 273 365 8 a93 1999 848 166 601 265 416 8 424 2000 878 172 706 258 448 8 456 2001 909 177 731 250 482 8 490 2002 942 184 758 242 516 8 524 2003 976 190 786 234 552 8 561 2004 1,013 196 816 226 590 8 598 2005 11051 203 847 219 629 8 637 2006 11091 211 880 211 660 8 677 2007 19133 218 914 203 711 8 720 2008 11177 227 950 195 755 8 763 2009 19223 235 988 187 801 8 809 2010 1,272 244 11028 180 848 8 657 2011 l,a`23 253 11070 172 898 8 906 2012 11376 263 1,113 164 949 173 19122 2013 15433 273 11159 (0) 11159 0 11159 2014 15492 284 19208 (0) 11208 0 1,208 2015 15554 295 15258 (0) 19258 0 11258 2016 11619 307 11312 (0) 11312 0 15312 2017 15687 320 11367 (QI 15367 0 11367 AVMCA I City of Denton, Texas Projettt 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project Flits 11,0300 Hydro Pro,lnct Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6A Saptember 169 1986 Sheet 1 of 6 - Cost Data Costs Canting. Deprecia, FERC Account $1000 L Bases Roaarks srsaszza"mrssassz9aa:x9asaame "80==9902 a2asn9asz a"msssars ssas9a=rse:"asa=stxa Production Plant 331-Struct./ImprDVenents Excavation/5acicfill 190 10 30 Powerhouse 190 10 30 332-Reser,lCams/Waterways Penstock & Access, 260 10 30 Tailrace/Stilling Basin 90 10 30 333-Water Wheels/Turb,/Gen. Turb/Gen and Aux, 1295 (3 AC Not subj, to Escal. Turb/Gen Installation 210 l0 AC 3'4-Access, Elect. Equip, 90 10 AC 335-Misc, Plant Equip, 115 10 AC Transmission Plant 35•-5tatian Equipment 83 10 AG 355-Poles and Fixtures 2 l0 34 356-0verhead Conductors ) l,) 30 337-Underground Conduit 8 10 30 358-Underground Conductors 7 10 30 z999xa=9z Subtotal Direct Costs 21581) Contingency 129 sa9meases Total Direct Costs 2,709 Indirect Costs 376 Not subj, to Escal. Escalation 99 AFUDi, 0 ssm Total Project Costs 31184 Key Project Dates Indirect Casts,'/. Cost Data Date 01-Jun-86 Licensing 0,4 Start Final Engineering 01-Jan-86 Engineering 810 Start Construction 01-Sep-87 Contt Mgt/Start 4,5 Commercial Operation 01-Apr-88 COE Fee 1.0 EscalatiD! During Coneruction Appreciation Bases Annual Percentage Rate 415 AC " ACRS Interest During Construction MM z Level for 40 years Annual Percentage Rate 0,0 Tax Credits Income Tax Rate,''/, 0 Investment,% 10 Other,% l1 i BVMCA City of Denton, Texas Projects ILiS66 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project Files 41.0500 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6A September 16, 1986 Sheet 2 of 6 - General Data Project Data es:essas:maasenarsxxnx¢samazmxssexxaa~ex Rated Project Capacity,kW 21799 Net Ave. Annual Gen,MWh 12,664 Dependable Proj, Capacity,kW 1,306 First Year Generation,MWh 7,158 Ave. Annual Generation,MWh 12,728 First Year Dperation,Months 9 Force Outage Factor,% 9915 Fin,ncing Data ate:sz:eaxszaaz=»zes=zzz=soza_»axczonzz7 Reserve Fund,S1000 :29 Principal Repayment Equity Financing,% (~,0 5 Years at 2,0 Debt Financing,'% 100,0 Then at 4,5 Financing Fee,% 3.5 W".inq FundiWF1~'.-` ;1 Dnbt Data Aal)unt Flnanced,i10OO bit Debt Term,Yrs. 25 Issue Date 01-Nov-86 lnterest,APR 5.0 Revenue Data xxszzcxxzc~z:..mccnzcssaszzaxsasoxzxxezn Interest on Unused Funds,APR 510 Energy Value,$/MWh 19,00 Level for I Years Then Escalate at 5.0 'G Capacity Value,$/kW-Mn 12.90 Level for 25 Years Then Escalate at 0.0 Y, Operating and Maintenance Data sazzzzxsazxxx~orzaeozzxzsxzzo-zzz»zscxx O&M Escalation,APR 5.0 First Year O&M Costs, 0.0 Y, of Total Project Costs or t 509000 State/Local Taxes, 0.0 of Total Prui ect Costs or f Insurance 0.6 Y of Total Project Costs or t FERC Fee t/MWh 3.00 + 3/Year Escalate? no Royalty/Fee M 1,t/MWh 1.00 + t/Year 0 Escalate? yes Royalty/Fee M213/MWh + Wear 11980 Escalate? yes Project Admin.,t/MWh 0.00 + f/Year 0 Escalate? no BVMCA City of Denton, Texas Projectl 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project filet 41,0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6A September 16, 1986 Sheet 3 of 6 - Project Revenues Annual Energy Energy Depend. Capacity Capacity Total Gen. Value Revenues Capacity Value Revenues Revenues Year MWh $/MWh $1000 kW $/kM-Mn $1000 $1000 as:amsamm =m==:=sca ==Raman== acc=mO=== =Zmmaaecc aacaaaasm mmwRX*2mm amnaamwsm 1986 1987 1988 71159 19,00 136 980 12.90 152 288 1989 12,664 19,95 253 19306 12.90 202 455 1990 129664 20.95 265 1,306 12.90 M 467 1991 129664 21.99 279 11306 12.90 202 481 1992 12,664 23.09 292 1,306 12.90 202 495 1993 12,664 24.25 307 1,306 12.90 202 509 1994 12,664 25.46 122 1,306 12.90 202 525 1995 12,664 26.73 339 1,306 12.90 202 541 1946 12,664 29.07 355 1,306 12.90 202 558 149 :2.b5~ .^.9,43 1.06 1 .911 U.. 575 199b 12,664 311.95 392 1,•305 12.90 202 594 1999 12,664 32.50 412 11306 12.90 202 614 2000 12,664 "4.12 432 1,306 12,90 202 634 2001 1216b4 Z5, 83 454 1,306 12.90 202 656 2002 12,664 37.62 476 1,306 12.90 202 679 2003 12,664 39.50 500 1,306 12.90 202 702 ,004 21664 41,47 525 1,306 12.90 202 727 2005 12,664 4:.55 551 1,306 12.90 202 754 2006 12,664 4`;,73 579 19306 12,90 202 781 2() 07 !2,664 48,01 608 1,306 12.90 202 810 2008 12,664 50.41 63E 1,306 12.90 202 841 2009 12,664 52.93 670 1,306 12.90 202 B73 2010 12,664 55.58 704 11306 12.90 202 906 2011 12,664 58.36 739 1,306 12.90 202 941 2012 12,664 61.28 776 1,306 12.90 202 978 2013 1 ,664 64,34 815 1,306 12.90 202 1,017 2014 12,664 67.56 856 1,306 12.90 202 1,058 2015 12,664 70.94 098 1,306 12,90 202 1,100 2016 12,664 74.48 943 1,306 12.90 202 1,145 2017 12,664 78.21 990 1,306 12,90 202 1,193 i 1 .J 8VMCA City of Denton, Texas Projects 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project Filti 41.0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6A Septeeber 16, 1986 Sheet 4 of 6 - Project Expenses 06M Taxes FERC Royalty Royalty Project Total Costs Insurance Fees Fees #1 Fees #2 Admin. Expenses Year $1000 $1000 #1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 ac=aaensa aemaaxaa_ zcasaszas zcaa:aaas sntxsaa:o aaasaaasa va:xaaaes navasssac 1984 1987 1988 38 14 21 7 2 0 82 1989 53 19 38 13 2 0 124 1990 55 19 38 13 2 0 127 1991 58 19 38 14 2 0 131 1992 61 19 38 15 2 0 135 1993 64 19 38 !5 2 0 139 1994 67 19 38 16 2 0 143 1995 70 19 38 17 3 0 147 1996 74 19 38 18 3 151 1907 19 10 1998 d1 19 38 20 3 0 161 1999 86 19 38 21 3 0 166 2000 90 19 38 22 i o 172 2001 94 19 38 23 3 0 177 2()02 99 19 38 24 4 0 184 2003 104 19 38 25 4 0 190 2004 109 19 38 26 4 0 196 2005 115 19 38 28 4 0 203 1006 120 19 38 29 4 0 211 2007 126 19 38 .fi 5 0 218 2(108 133 19 38 32 5 0 227 2009 139 19 38 34 5 0 235 2010 146 19 38 35 5 0 244 22011 154 19 38 07 5 1) 253 2012 161 19 38 39 6 0 263 2013 169 19 38 41 6 0 273 2014 178 19 38 43 6 0 284 2015 187 19 38 45 7 0 295 2016 196 19 38 47 7 0 307 2017 206 l4 38 50 7 0 320 WCA City of Denton, Texas Projecti 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project Files 41,0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6A September 16, 1986 Sheet 5 of 6 - Debt Service Begin. Princ. Int. on Debt Debt Int, on Net Debt Princ. Payment Princ. Reserves Invest. Unused # Service Year #1000 $1000 #1000 41000 #1000 #1000 #1000 =V2MZtCan WUMV200W= =3=92MOMW ea_esa::x Ca9C94=*V 10GOMOmaa UZZOW 0ifa ■oanaaa~2 1986 31652 0 46 39652 200 46 0 1987 31652 0 183 31452 21388 173 10 1988 31652 73 183 11054 725 53 203 1989 31579 73 179 329 16 236 1990 31506 73 175 329 16 232 1991 31433 73 172 329 16 228 1992 35360 73 168 329 16 225 199; 31287 164 164 329 16 312 1994 31123 164 156 320 16 304 1995 2,958 164 148 312 16 297 1996 2,794 164 140 304 f5 289 1497 17 1676 164 1'1 :q6 1` 281 1993 2,465 164 12' '189 14 273 1999 21301 164 115 279 In 265 2000 21137 164 107 271 14 258 2001 11972 164 99 263 13 250 2002 1,808 164 90 255 13 242 2003 1,643 164 82 247 12 234 04 1,479 164 74 ~38 12 ^IN I 26 2005 113I5 164 66 230 12 219 2006 19150 164 58 222 11 211 2007 966 164 49 214 it 203 200£ 822 164 41 205 10 195 2009 657 164 33 197 10 187 2010 493 164 25 189 9 180 2011 329 164 16 181 9 172 2012 164 164 8 173 9 164 2013 (0) 0 (0) 0 t) (0) 2014 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 2015 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 2016 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 2017 (0) 0 (0) 0 0 (0) BVMCA City 04 Denton, Texas Project: 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project Filet 41,0300 Hydro Project Feasibility Evaluation - Case 6A September 16, 1986 Sheet 6 of 6 - Income Analysis Annual Annual Operating Net Debt Net Draw on Net Revenues Expenses Income Service kevenues Debt Reser Cash Year $1000 $1000 $1000 $1000 41000 $1000 $1000 MUCK" Una 02OZZMaaa GaCG~O~LO Z=M2a=IDS: zsanass:m =C=CM==Z= CaSaCt3t.R aatga i'~ai 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 0 0 0 l0 (10) 10 0 1988 288 82 205 203 2 0 2 1989 455 124 331 2;6 95 0 95 1990 467 127 340 232 108 0 108 1991 481 131 350 228 121 0 121 1992 495 135 36) 225 135 0 135 1993 509 139 371 312 58 8 61 Vl) 1994 525 JU $ 8 304 77 8 86 1995 541 147 394 297 97 8 105 1996 558 151 406 259 117 8 126 1997 57~, 1c[ 4.q E 146 1998 594 161 433 ?7; 16(1 3 168 1999 614 166 447 265 182 8 190 2000 634 172 463 258 205 8 113 2001 656 177 476 250 229 8 237 2002 679 184 495 242 2`3 3 261 2003 702 190 b13 234 278 8 287 2004 727 196 531 226 305 8 313 2005 754 203 550 219 332 8 340 2006 781 211 570 211 360 8 368 2007 810 218 592 203 389 if 397 200b 841 7.27 614 195 419 6 427 2009 873 235 638 187 450 8 458 2010 906 244 662 180 463 B 491 2011 941 253 688 172 516 8 514 2012 978 263 715 164 551 173 724 2013 11017 273 744 (0) 744 0 744 2014 1,058 284 774 (1)) 774 0 774 2015 11100 295 805 (0) 805 0 805 2016 11145 307 838 (0) 838 0 838 11017 10193 320 873 (0) 873 0 673 i LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT rao~ ~ V.aah, E„~in..~AroAA.e1s KMiw My tM1tT1116 pw VANLr 4N/t TO F" POKMpr -aw"m I NtM IfJIfTpCfl Cvwfwm 11 U" cummw "hm rMlr,! "tw pootMOONCt !TM{1CTYK ewwvi LL 6' / .NIA ,a~iwir~rilai~www~ ~ t11117M1~ ~CtIM71 IOitf/N _ tMIt TIMO ONTLty CNAWdL I [tI1jTIN6 tMIfTINO PAR04ING LADY tL.,~o CL. sw,o I 0.,449.0 ft.~ Ano - 4 ',l MMFO' i?•i'Lf"7.Ti GENERAL SITE ARRANGEMENT r PROJECT HISTORY Black & Veatch Retained to Perform Ucensing Work October 1980 Feastbility Study Completed November 1981 FERC Application Filed October 1982 FERC License Received Mach 1984 Black & Veatch Authorized to Bid Turbine Generator January 19$5 FERC Ucense Extended February 1966 Turbine Generator Specifications Issued for Bids March 1966 Bids Received May 1986 Evaluation Complete June 1966 Negotiation Complete September 1966 llrah ~ V~MoA, EeNM+MeyAn~►11req Kaew Chy .ram ri .`,.--•71!r t7#~rEVI FTI,`T,jp s3s .g. 1 PROJECT FEASIBILITY EVALUATION SUMMARY Based on Dominion Bridge Sulzer Base Bid 2,789 kW Dependable Project Capacity 1,306 kW Average Annual Generation 12,664 MWh Project Capital Costs Bid or Awarded $1,636,000 Estimated Balance 10419,000 Contingency 1290000 Total $301840000 Financing Amount • Total $30652,000 Reserve Fund 329,000 Financing Fee 3.5% Interest Rate 5% Term 2S Years Payment Schedule 2.0% for 5 Years 4.5% for 20 Years Revenue Data Energy Value $27.56/MWh in 1988 Escalatable at 3% Capacity Value $16.00/kW-Mn Firm Fees FERC Administrative $1,880 Escalatable FERC Water Use $1/MWh FERC Headwater Benefits $2/MWh Dallas Fee $1/MWh ' , p, . , trr ..:^..,'1+a-' rq++Nr- iw'• a,~ ~q. •RF; ; : . ..y r. I~/~ W 20.0 $27.SWMWh 15.0 $16.00/kW-Mn 16.0 Cumulative Net 14.0 Operating Income 12.0 10.0 Net Cash 8.0 6.0 4.0 Cumulative Net Debt Service 2.0 0 1988 1592 19% 2000 20.-4 2008 2012 2016 Year 14.0 518.90/MWh $12.90/kW-Mn 14.0 12.0 Cumulative Net 10.0 Operating Income 8.0 Net Cash 6.0 4.0 Cumulative Net Debt Service 2.0 1988 1997 1996 2900 2004 2008 2012 2016 Year KEY NEAR-TERM ACTIVITIES • Authorize Project • Award Turbine Generator Contract • Release Black & Veatch for Final Design • Initiate Corps of Engineer's Review wok. Vow.,, I sl*motiArdismu Kovno a" FUTURE SCHEDULE Award Turbine Generator Contract October 1966 Black & Veatch Released for Engineering October 1966 Initial Corps of Engineer Meeting November 1985 Penstock and Valve Specification Issued for Bids February 1987 Awarded May 1987 General Construction Specifications Issued for Bids May 1967 Awarded August 1987 Start Onsite Construction September 1987 Commercial Operation March 190 Lewisville Lake Level Increased Much 1968 lM~eii k VMIafi, knOk►IIK►AroAiNob Krw~p CRY BID FEATURES SUMMARY _ achy at 60 ft Head Turbine Ave Annual Location of Rated Maximum Generation Tie Manufacturer kW kW MWh Allis Chalmers 2146 2358 120377 Horn USA Dominion Bridge-Sulzer Base 2131 2799 12, 728 Horz Switz. Alternate 2103 2332 12,556 Horz Switz. Ingerioil-Rand 2121 2164 120328 Incl Italy Voith Hydro Base 2218 2250 12,236 Ilorz W. Germ. Alternate 2205 2354 12,'182 Horz W. Germ. • Generator and Auxiliary Electric Equipment are All Manufactured in the USA. show M YoobA, Rea+M.•FA~sou c,w BID EVALUATION SUMMARY Total Total Evaluated Evaluated Total Costs - Costs - Comparative Limited Full Lump Sum Capital Capacity Capacity Bid Price Costs Credits Credits $1000J $1000 $1000 $1000 Allis Chalmers 1,535 1,513 10613 11814 Dominion Bridge-Sulzer Base 10,216 10308 1,:08 1,308 Alternate 1, i 15 10190 11240 10452 Ingersoll-Rand 10120 10218 1,394 1,621 Volth Hydro Base 1,394 1,307 1,470 1,197 Alternate 1,386 10299 10454 10657 Nook ~ VNleh, Enoh~erA►a1MMeb Kom" el" DOMINION BRIDGE - SULZER BASE BID VS ALTERNATE BID Base A.1ternate Lump Sum Bid Price $112150950 $1,115,000 Maximum Capacity 2799 kW 2332 kW Average Annual generation 12,728 MWh 12,556 MWh Fiow Range at 60 ft Net Head Maximum 630 cfs 530 cfs Minimum 175 cfs 115 cfs Lewisville Reservoir Safe Yield 270 cfs Dallas-Irving WTP Capacity 370 cfs Existing Lewlsvillie Reservoir Avmage Release and Level Will Increase Due to Ray Roberts Reservoir Flow Duration of Model 190 cfs or More 9s% 530 cfs or More 10% 630 cfs or More 8% 2 way a w.eoh, ~E.Ara~IMOn Komw Clay r ~ A, \ ~ r • l Rc7t4tilAr~~f ~ f , {JH,JYN MCWIYt.~ 7 lip" __tl_ • 1 I. .L_ - ---.I'-'^- E-lrOMe aaw •11..r.wr W.w1. ..p wsswa ~ _ _ I .4Nr ~i ~F ,1'!~n I •+nNa EMI ®IN r■+l{1y41}( _ - _ . ~u ._1 r JJl~~- ~ Y 8N1{ lwrll n ~ ~ f 1 PJ! M(IDW r[( 1,. w116w.1 y III I"1 h_-Ifl!SA@>•1 '~,'y Ias.rt An~~l 16 l%'1 'r .4 40" pl, to UAAMM& Ira. y{1 M H. I 1 ~r..,~ ~ ~hk1 ! #fML Of 1111 .fl iT~llll A• /Y!•'a TOW K Alf ON AAMNbAlmlm m~IM/.rt t a rar . /ufAMl[ - - - - - - - - - - A6 M 34 31 26 33 21 3. 6D "32 36A 36" / 71 70 72 I I ~ f . N2o 11 1 6 D 7 101269 ,l 7 M 31 1 99 91 u Slle6 Mss _ AM- 63 91167.1 - !OM 9 112 1o its 961561" 19 ♦0 ~ 93 ~~~ir rr.Yn n Iwrw Y rrY.+. Nr • .PNMI 1 I W~I N ryr Y rIYrM M r•Y.Y Y VY W 1 1 rMti NrNYN N~rNW Nx1 YNfIr1 1 r YU !I rNyl .1 bN Y rrW Y u YMn f ••YM 11 • uNY II IAYI i IYHY / .ryl•1 • Y I.YM i D i rxH 11 t ' ry/NI I rY,l rr Ny N ~ ~ rrN•r Y NrrYM Yrrw N}r r ~ ruYYl w N..Y.N NrNYl4 N r q rxlM Y Y nYrY Y N I+YY M ~ i4wl' 4 r zx Y rrYl y rMN/ • Y ryiM • Y rxM a! IiNM Y Y nYM N INYN N1~ ~ I yYl Y N IINM Y rNYY Y II rMM~ • Y IWrN x INYN N.yIH Y x oNY Y Y IMrrl Y rrMlO Y Nlw~ Y r rMY .I NYI H rrN'1 M IMM N tiM t V rMiY • Y riwrl i •+YY NYIYI 1*I 1 rWY Y. H rMrrl Y IrNlr N r..•Ix - YIM.Y I1~ YrM•.x N~WxI Ya11~1 r r r M ~~1Dt•yt111(r 1 ~•1t 1 UdlhtiW DAM ~ r rlyr LwJS4~6tlriy i M1 N rw.w~Yrw.wa •OINN , ~N6M61wro CffY 0/ Dff1f ON', T/'X" MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 70201 TELEPHONE MI 7) 500-8307 M E M O R A N D U M Oft e of the Oty Manager TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager PROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager DATE: September 12, 1966 SUBJECT: Airport Improvements The Airport Advisory Board met last T u e ay and discussed improvements to the airport. They discussed the airport grant as well as funding other improvements to work hand-in-hand with the grant. We have been advised that the grant will be offered. In fact, we have a resolution on the council agenda for such action Tuesday night, In conjunction with that, the Board felt that they should recommend to the council that additional financing be provided to provide access to the grant. facilities. They felt that this would enhance the development capabilities of the airport and they also felt that in two or three years, it would make the airport self-sufficient. Finally, they felt it would help us in persuading the FFA on future grant money. These improvements would also help us market our facilities to industrial prospects and help enhance our industrial development capabilities. As you can see from the minutes, they suggested that the Council consider $500,uou which would enable us to do ail the access roads and utility lines and develop all the new taxi-way areas. It would also allow us to make improvements to the terminal building, buy a small amount of equipment, and provide us with some funds to extend taxi-ways so that our leasing activity incentive can remain strong. If the council feels that a more conservative approach is needed, then they would recommend a minimum of $400,000 be funded through C.O,'s: If you or the council have any further questions, we will be happy to ry and answer then for you at the study session. Rick vehl Assistant City Manager sj 307SM IA,XIWAYS Tti~ 4 FGADS ~ I I I. I n t I 12 1 1 I~ t .I 6FACON y; r rl Ij ull I I 1rl ; 9 tpjJ)M(`'IIr Lal 2 d 3 ~ , 1 r °f DLNTON I MICI9AL A111P0*' Ubie I LAUD USAGE By ACREAGE • (AugUSt. 1964) ITEM I FLIGHT ACTIVITIES {AAcres) AEMAMIN IMG A 1NARD 1PAP , ASPACES e A- Runways, Taxiways, Cleat Zones 1&2 6 3~ 0 0 SUBTOTAL I 3904 0 210.0 0 0 ITEM II - DEVELOPED ACREAGE A* Ramp space 7.5 26 be Hangar areas 61 Co Property leased, but 6.2 65 65 not developed 17.79 0 0 d. Roads, parking, other 315 0 •-0 - SUBTOTAL II 31.9 20511 93 116 ITEM III - UNDEVELOPED ACREAGE Me west aide of Airport 122.0 0 be East Aid* of Airport 83.0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 111 205.0 GRAND TOTAL 638.0 93 116 The Denton Municipal Airport is comprised of 638 acres. Of that total, approximately 398 &(,res are dedicatmr .n flight activities, 31.9 acres have been developed and/or leased, and 20*,U acres remain available for development. (The flight activities total includes approximately 55 acres which have boe;j reserved for a future 1,000-foot utility runway 10000 feet west :,nd parallel of the exir:ing runway). There are 93 based aircraft and, with the opening of the new ramp in late August, 1905, 116 available tie-down and hangar spaces. All aircraft hangars remain full with a waiting ,.tst. .i Table 2 LEASE PROPERTY AND REVENUE sIfMMRY (1985/86 fiscal Year) G GROUND GROUND ISAKAR AREA LEASE LEASE TIE-DOWN :TEM I y AVIATION LtASES (Acr4s) RATE R6YENUE$ i FUEL FEES TOTAL a. City hangars .62 - - 3,040 5,040 be City Tie-down 5450 - 110520 11rS20 c. Maverick Aircraft 23.90 00.0084 # 90809 13,050 220859 d. Pox-51 C.B.O. 1.29 0.035 1,970 10500 3,470 e. Fox-51 Coswercial 0076 0107 2y310 - 2,310 f. Jay Rodgers .3.77 0.07 4 696 ..r 6x646 - LZ= SUBTOTAL I 35.84 0.016 20,785 131011051,895 (CTS/SF avg.) - ITEM II - OTHER REVENUE a. Agricultural lease 305.00 0.0003 4,916 - 4 916 be special events - - .31500 3,900 - SUBTOTAL II 305.00 0.00003 # 8,416 - 6,416 GRAND TOTAL 341.02 29,201 129,843 600311 Figures for City Hangars and Tie-downs are annual revenues based on full occupancy of six hangars at $70 per month and 24 tie-down customers at ~40 per month. Maverick and Fox-51 hangar and fuel fee estimates are based on 1985/66 totals. Ground Lease Rates represent cents per square foot per year. , is Table AIRPORT constS (1945/16 Fiscal Year) ITEM I - AIRPORT OpERATIONS AMOUNT as Personal services b• Supplies 048,223 C. Maintenance 20985 d• Services (Telephone, Electric, etc,) 8,450 to Insurance 13,601 f• Sundry 601 g• Fixed Assets (vehicles, machinery) 7 700 -~„IM SUBTOTAL I #81,246 'TEM II - DLOT SERVICE a• 1979 Runway overlay Project (#170,000 balance of Cityls #11,475 10% matching Share of FAA Grant) SUBTOTAL II 011,475 GRAND TOTAL #92,721 TOTAL AIRPORT EXPENSES - $920721 TOTAL AIRPORT REVENUES - 600311 BALANCE ($320410) Airport Operation Expenses based on 1985/86 Fiscal Year budget. Airport revenues from Table 2. Wl. l4M►14t 4 CONSTAMION COST SSTIMTBS ,pt1985''Yt)t or sW►tOR? FACILITY (Augustp ITBN I - RAIDS i TAUVAYS 30,000 lb. Pavesiant (3' asphalt, 100 (31(,' 000 lb, Go Pavement rock, 60 line) asphalt, 6• rock, f• lime} 6600 sqs yd. Asphalt 7,50 sq, yd. Rock 5,00 sq, yd. all sq, yd. Live 5.00 sq. yd. 1.40 sq, yd, Lime Prep. ,81 sq. yd. 1022 sq, yd. Excavation 1.60 sq. yd. 1.70 `q, yd. Eng. yd. 6 Insp. 1.64 *93 sq. yd• Cont, (56) ,_„9 sq. yd. #19.56 sq. yd. #16.66 sq, yd. ITS" II - ROADWAYS 24' WIDE PAVEMENT (2' asphalt, 60 lime) #4.00 sq. yd. Asphalt Al sqa yd. Lime 1.40 sq, yd, Lime Prep, 1.22 sq. yd. Excavation .74 sq. yd. Eng. i Insp, 940 sq, yd, Cont. ($1) #8.57 sq. yd. ITEM III - WATER i SEWIR LINES 8' Water main - 020.00 per ft. 6' Water line - $18.00 per ft. 10• Sewer line - 020.00 per ft. ITEM IV - MISCELLANEOUS Street lights #1,200 each Underwood road improvement - 31 asphalt 0 $6.00 per sq. yd. Ramp and Taxiway estimates are based on per square yard costs of constructing a 30,000 pound weight bearing wapscity ramp and taxiway in August, 1985. Roadway and water and sewer line construction costs are working estimates used by city street and water department. i I "t' 7 Table S i TAXIWAY COST ESTIMATES FOR FULL DEVCLOPMUT Of SOUTH CAST SIDE Of AIRPORT TAXIWAY DI No S1 ON MEIGNT BEARING TAXIWAY TAXIWAY MUNU R (LENGTH 6 WIDTH) CAPACITY TYPE COST 11 750 x 30' 30,000 lbs. Access 400900 2. 725 x 30' 30,000 lbs. Access 470270 3. 10180 x 30, 30,000 lbs. Access 76,936 4. 650 x 30' 30,000 lbs. Access 42,310 S. 6SO x 20' 15,000 lbs. Hangar 240064 6. 650 x 20' 15,000 lbs. Hangar 24,064 7. 650 x 201 1`,000 lbs. Hangar 24,064 8. 650 x 30' 30,000 lbs. Acceas/8angar 42 380 Total 17, 516 sq. yda. 03 Estimates of costs of City construction of all taxiways in the south east section of the airport. Access taxiways are main entrance taxiways to hangar areas which would iemain public easements. Hangar Taxiways are secondary taxiways within a hangar area. Table 6 ROADWAY COST ESTIMATES TO SERVICE PULL DEVELOPMENT OF EAST SIDE Of AIRPORT S ROADWAY DIMENSION ROADWAY TYPE (LENGTH 6 WIDTH) 10 1,3001 x 24' Entrance (John Carrell Road) 29,709 21 1,100' x 14' Hangar access roadway 27,610 3. 644' x 24' Fuel Farm roadway 14,700 41 1000' x 24' South entrance roadway 290709 5. 200' x 24' Hangar access roadways 4,571 TOTAL $1060309 Automobile Parking Atea 1. 230' x 50' East of New FAA ramp $ 100940 2, 230' Y. :J' East 4 New FAA ramp 10,940 TOTAL $ 21,880 GRAND TOTAL x:.128,189 Roadways ate of standard City design, two lanes, twenty-foir feet in width. Roadways include the main entrance road (John Carrell Road), the south entrance road and secondary hangar access roads. the fuel farm road is des.gned to allow fuel truck ingreaz and ogress to the fael farm without the need for backing or turnaround, Table I WATER, SEWER, AND MISCEL14WZOUS COST G57IMATtS S TO SERV % ICE FULL DEVELOPMENT OF EAST SIDE OF AIAPOINT ITEM I - Water Lines 1. 20600, on water 1401n with lire hydrants located parallel to Roadways 1 and 4 2, 3,430, 60 water "in with fire hydrants # 42,000 encompassing areas 8 and 0 _ 7_ 0,_, 740 TOTAL WATER LINES #112,740 ITEM II - Sewer Lines 1. 11300, l0' sanitary sewer line located north of and parallel to Roadway 1 2b, 000 2. 1,150, l0• sanitary sewer line located adjacent to hangar access Roadway 2 25 , 000 TOTAL SEWER LINES 51,000 ITEM III - Miscellaneo~:c 1. Street Lights - 12 Sta-Ndard Street Security Lights 2. Fencing Material - $ 14,400 Security chain link fencing 10,000 3, Underwood Road Improvements - 3' a--.halt overlay 17,066 4. Architect Design Standards Package _ 1_1L j' 302 TOTAL MISCF„LLANEOUS 52,766 GRAND TOTAL 226,506 Water and sewer lines to service FBO {fixed base operator) and large commercial hangars. Street lights to be placed along entrance roadways and adjacent to aircraft and vehicle parking areas. Fencing to be a chain link fence around aircraft parking areas and improvex*nt to wits fence along sieport boundary. Underwood road to be improved to support weight of fuel trucks and additional traffic. Table a TOTAL COST ESTIMATLS OF FULL DCVELOPMEMT OF EAST SIDS OF AIRPORT I, ITEM I - TAXIWAYS (Table S) Total cost of taxiways $33f3,058 ITEM II - ROADliAYS i pARXIMG (Table 6) Total cost of roadways and parking 1280189 ITEM III - WATER, SEWER i MISC (Table 6) Total Water, setter h Misc 2161506 GRAND TOTAL 0674,753 Grand total for the full development of the southkast side of the airport, Figures reflect City construction of all taxiways, roads water and Sewer lines. Table 9 POTENTIAL ANNUAL GROUND LEASE RVI:NUES FULL DSVELOPNENT OF SOUTHEAST SIDE OF AIRPORT AREA A - 200 x 700 ■ 140,000 sq ft (3,2 acres) # 140000 ground lease rate - 104 sq ft AREA S - 400 x 650 o 260,000 sq ft (5.9 acres) 260000 ground tease rate - 100 sq ft ARIA C - 460 x 775 ■ 479,160 eq ft (11 acres) 330541 ground lease rate - 071 aq ft AREA D - 325 x 775 • 271,450 sq ft (6,2 acres) ground lease rate - 07~i sq ft 19,002 AREA E - 145 'c 620 = 80,600 • 175 x 590 ■l30,250 184,440 eq ft (4,2 acres) 12,910 ground lease rate - 079 aq ft TOTAL 1,335,050 eq ft (30.65 acres) 105,453 Figures reflect potential revenues from airport land leases. Areas A through E are outlined on the attached ;ayout flan, Table illustrates dimensions of each area, size in square feet and acres, and suggested ground lease rate in cents per square foot per year, Table 10 PROPOSED IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT PLANS I, Taxiways Taxiway 1 # 48,900 Taxiway 2 47,170 Taxiway 3 76,936 One-Half Taxiways 3, 6, $70286 7 and 8 TOTAL Taxiway 0230,392 II, Roadways Roadway 1 # 29,675 Roadway 2 27,600 Roadway 4 34,280 TOTAL Roadways 91,575 111. Auto Parking Parking Lot 1 4-10j940 940 TOTAL Auto Parking 10,940 IV. water Lines with Hydrants 8' water Line 42,000 6' dater Line 701740 TOTAL water Lines $112,740 Y. Sewer Lines Sewer Line 1 26,000 Sewer Line 2 25,000 TOTAL Sewer Lines $ 510000 VI. Miscellaneous Street Lights 14,400 Security Fencing 10,000 Underwood Road Improvements 170066 Architect Design Standards 11,300 Package TOTAL Miscellaneous $_52766 G?.AND TOTAL $549,413 Proposed initial or immediate construction for development of southeast aide of airport, Plans call for construction of five Access Taxiways, Access Roadways 10 40 and Hangar Roadway 2, one Auto Parking lot, slater and Sewer lines serving the Commercial Areas and Security lighting and fencing. Table 11 COST PROPOSED IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WITH FAA PARTICIPATION TOTAL CITY COST 1. Taxiways Taxiway 1 480900 40890 Taxiway 2 47,270 41727 Taxiway 3 76,936 7 693 One-Half of Taxiways S, 6 57,286 17,310 7and8 TOTAL Taxiways X230- 392 74,590 II. Roadways Roadway 1 29,615 Roadway 2 27 600 Roadway 4 34,280 TOTAL Roadways 910575 112. Auto Parking Parking Lot 1 $ 10,940 TOTAL Auto Parking # 10,940 IV. Water Lines with Hydrants 80 Water ;.ine $ 42,000 6' Water Line 70,740 TOTAL Water Lines $1120740 V. Sewer Lines Sewer Line 1 26,000 Sewer Line 2 25,000 TOTAL Sewer Lines $ 51,000 VI. Miscellaneous Street Lights 140400 Security Fencing 10fU00 Underwood Road Improvements 170066 Architect Design Standard 11,300 Package TOTAL Miscellaneous # 52,766 GRAND TOTAL $3930611 The Airport has received federal assistance in the cost of constructing Taxiways to 2, and 3. Such assistanct in the form of an Airport improvement Grant normally provides for 901 federal funding. The City of Denton's share in this case would be 10% or $17,310. This would reduce the cost of the roiosed immediate development plans by $155,796 leaving a grand total of 39 , 611. Table 12 (PRESENT AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED) AIRPORT TERMINAL IMPROVEMENTS Terminal Upgrade: , ft ape and support Post Replaced Soo Insulation 936 (taint Exterior 150 Carpet Soo BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL # 20186 Terminal Porch: Enclose porch TOTAL $ 40022 AIRPORT TERMINAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL # 61808 The building improvements total represents funds to be used to upgrade the building's interior and exterior and extend its useful life into the late 1990's when major expansion will be needed, The terminal porch will provide shelter to the public during hours the terminal is closed and to increase insulation around the building to reduce utility cost, RAN, WAY :MPRCVEMENTS 750,000 ft,2 of aurface Two coats of sealer $ 4,000 Survey and Repaint Runway 141100 (a01060 ft,2 at $0.18 per sq. ft.) RUNWAY. IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL $18,400 The runway has deteriorated to the point that excessive aggregate is loose on the surface, This must be vacuumed up on a regular basis to prevent damage to aircraft using the field, Also there are numerous finger cracks that will only become more serious with the coming of another winter. The runway needs to be repainted in any case. The sealer will prevent a multi-million dollar overlay to be needed prematurely. GRAND TOTAL, $25, 208 TABLE 13 (PRESENT AIRPORT EQUIPMENT NEEDED) AIRPORT GROUNDS MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT Jacobson CW 224 Turfcat $ 9,639 72" Rotary Deck 20304 Caster Wheel Option 230 TOTAL $12,273 I There are 20 acres on the airport that must be mowed on a regular basis to promote safe operation on the airport. The present mower is six years old and cannot be expected to last another season. AIRPORT CONTINGENCY FUNDS FOR MAINTENANCE, DEVELOPMENT AND EQUIPMENT Contingency Fund $69,008 While we are constantly seeking other funding alternatives, there ire several problem areas at the airport which may require significant funds to resolve. One such problem involves the Northeast corner drainage channel which is rapidly erroding away and will eventually endanger the hangars in that area. we are attempting to secure federal funds for this works however, we are uncertain relative to the FAA's ability to finance these improvements in an appropriate time frame. A second problem area involves the sweeping of the airport runway which must be done on a daily basis to ensure that no accidents occur due to debris on the runway. Since our present equipment is over 20 years old and the City is liable for accidents caused by runway debris, we must be prepared to address this issue In the net- future. There are several other smaller projects, such as security fencing, lighting, etc., which may require attention in the next few years. Additionally, future development needs and federal grant offers requiring local matching funds will occur in the near future which will necessitate City funding. TABLE 14 (TOTAL PACKAGE A) 1. Immediate Southeast Corner Development 3930611 (TABLE 11) II. Immediate Airport Improvements $ 250208 (TABLE 12) III. Immediate Airport Equipment Needs $ 12,173 (TABLE 13) IV. Contingency Package $ 691008 GRAND TOTAL $5000000 Table IS ( TO'T'AL PACKAGE 5) I~ Imodiate 5autheast Corner Developsent (TABLE 11)393,b11 Ii. Immediate Airport Improvements Terminal Upgrade (TABLE 12) ; 2,766 III. Contingency Package 3 603 GRANTS TOTAL #400, 000 0073e SOUTHEAST AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PROJECTED GROUND LEASE REVENUE VS, PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS 1987 - 1997 110 000 99,000 D 88,000 0 77,000 L 66.000 L 55,000 A 44,000 R 33,000 S 22,000 11,000 000,000 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 - PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS - 1987-1997 - PROJECTED GROUND LEASE REVENUE - 1987-1997 AIR2 SOUTHEAST AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PROJECTED GROUND LEASE REVENUE VS, PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS 1998 - 2008 110,000 99,000 D 88,000 0 11,00n L 66,000 L 55,000 A 44,000 R 33,000 S 22,000 13,000 0000000 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20MB 2006 2061 2008 - PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS - 1998-2008 - PROJECTED GROUND LEASE REVENUE - 1998-2008 AIR2 :6006000 CITY OF KNT099 TEXAS COMINATION TAx 00 REYEISUE CERTIFICATES OF O&L.14ATIONO SENIES 1986 DATED: 13I 1/96 FIRST CPN WE: 2/15/87 PRINCIPAL DUE: : 2115 INTEREST OUEi 2/16 8/16 YEAR END PRESENT 11 500 000 ISSUE REOUi_RETS -THIS REST _ BRAND TOTAL T-- - " ' REOU1 1187 : 3,7766405 s ?5,000 = 30,656 i 1988 3,444,625 250000 3rs~0 666566 3,831.461 19A9 307610316 26,000 366000 so42,000 3.506.626 1494 360176560 25,000 336000 'nm 30821015 1991 2.889,528 259000 31,000 68,000 36016,650 1992 2,fS3,633 26.000 560000 2,9450628 1493 296436663 ?56000 29'0 541,000 ?•8070533 1994 20662,396 25 000 27'~ 52'000 2.6956663 1946 20343,696 260004 269000 O/~O/~O~ 606000 266126396 1996 20286.865 250000 23'~ 48,000 2,391.596 1997 2,063,193 25,000 `10~ 46,000 26332.866 93 l2,.1ro807,61840 1~0 106663;000 25 26s9000 15'000 244,000 °00 2040 10606,0000 26,000 130000 40•~ 10623,060 2001 1,2086000 266000 119000 36~~ 166436000 2402' 1,135,000 26,1000 1,241,000 2003 16070,000 25600~0 x7'0 34,000 10169,000 2004 7706000 2600/00 ,000 0 32,900 1101026000 2006 25,000 66000 30,000 800,040 2006 30000 289000 28 000 26,000 10000 266000 26,000 f 40,476097? $ $00000 $ 3910566 8910656 41,368,533 i INTEREST CALCULATED AT 80000% FOR PURPOSES OF ILLUSTRATION, ' i 1 SOUTHEAST AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PROJECTED GROUND LEASE REVENUE VS. PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS 1987 - 1997 110,000 99 000 D 88,000 0 77,000 L 66,000 L 55,000 A 44,000 R 33,000 S 22,000 11,000 0000000 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 - PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS - 1987-1997 - PROJECTED GROUND LEASE REVENUE - 1987-1997 AIR2 SOUTHEAST AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PROJECTED GROUND LEASE REVENUE VS, PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS 1998 - 2008 1101000 99,000 D 88,000 0 77,000 L 66,000 L 55,000 A 44,000 R 33,000 S 22000 11,000 0009000 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 - PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS - 1998-2008 - PROJECTED GROUND LEASE REVENUE - 1998-2008 AIR2 500 000 CITY OF D6W. TEXAS COMBINATION TAX AND REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OiLIBATION. SERIES 1986 DATED: 11/ 1/86 FIRST CPN DUE; 8/15/87 PRINCIPAL DUE: 2/15 INTEREST DUE: B/15 2/15 YEAR END PRESENT THIS 500 000 ISSUE GRAND TOTAL 9/38 , REQUIRE TS r„ REOUIREME~ NTS 1987 ; 3,775,!05 : $ 31,666 $ 31,566 $ 3,807,461 1988 3.444,526 26,000 390000 649000 3,608,525 1989 3061,316 269000 37,000 62,000 3,823015 1990 3,017,560 269000 35,000 609000 3,077,650 1991 29889,628 26,000 331,000 58,000 2,9479528 1992 2,753,533 250000 31,000 560000 2.809,533 1993 2,6439653 25,000 29,000 549000 296979653 1994 2,5629396 259000 271.000 52,000 29614,395 1995 2,343,596 25,000 25,000 509000 2,3931,596 19% 2,286,866 25,000 23,000 48,000 2034,865 1997 29063,193 259000 21,000 46,000 2,109,193 1998 1,6669840 25,000 19,0t10 44,000 1,7109840 1999 1,6839080 250000 17,060 42,000 1,626,080 2000 1116061000 269000 160000 40.000 1.6469000 2001 102060000 25,000 13,000 38,000 1,243,000 2002 1,136,000 300000 100840 40,800 191750800 2003 10070,000 30,000 8,400 38,400 1,108,400 2004 770,000 30,000 61000 360000 806,000 2006 300000 30600 33,600 33,600 2006 300000 19200 31,200 31.200 $ 40,476,977 $ 6009000 ; 425,556 $ 9259556 $ 41,402,533 INTEREST CALCULATED AT 8.000% FOR PURPOSES OF ILLUSTRATION, COPY M21f►Z'E$ AIRPORT AMSORY BOARD September 9, 1986 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 19660. AT 5100 P.M., IN THE TERMINAL BUILDING OF THE MUNICI- PAL AIRPORT. MMERS PRESENT- Arno, Carrell, Hayward, Keith, Smith, Williams, Wright MEMBEF~S ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT; Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manaqer; Rill Angelo, Assistant Director of Public Works; and Bruce Cardwell of the City Staff 1. The Board considered the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Au- gust 12, 1986. A motion was made and seconded to approve the Minutes as written. 2. The Board considered recommending to the cir.} Counr tance of the FAA Grant Al' 3-48-0067-03, The bear` was informed that because the Grant had to be awarded by September 300 but engineering was not yet completed on the pro}ect, the Grant would be awarded by the FAA by estimate. The Board was assured that if the estimate needed to be adjusted at a later date after the Grant was awarded and accepted by the City, the FAA would make arrange- ments to do so, A motion was made by John Carrell and seconded by C,ene Wright to recommend to the City Council the acceptance of the FAA Grant AIP 3-48-0.067-03, based on estimates. The motion passed unanimously. 3. The board considered recommending to the City Council the approval of financing the Southeast Corner Airport Development. The hoard was informed that the City Staff had met with the City's Financial Advisor Frank Medanich, from First southwest, and that financing was available for development of the Airport, The Board was presented with two financial packages for developing the Southeast Corner. The Board felt that as an absolute minimum a financing package in the amount of $400,000 should be issuedl however, they felt strongly that a package in the amount of $500,000 should be issued to cover the immediate development and equipment needs of the Airport, A motion was made by Gene Wright and seconded stating that in order to complete initial development of the Southeast Corner of the Airport, the Board recoamends to the City Council the AIRPORT ADVISORY DOM MIKMs September 9, 1986 Page 2 issuance of Certificates of Obligations in the amount of $400,000 to $500,000. The notion passed unanimously, 4. The Board considered the Airport Manager's Report. The acting Airport Manager stated that he had reconsidered and decided not to apply for the Airport Manager's position. The Board was updated on the automated weather system by Handar. The Board suggested that Bandar's system be purchased. The Port A Port System he:Agars were discussed. The board expressed an interest in seeing some of their buildings at other airports. Also, the Board suggested that steps be taken to locate Port A Port hangars on the South Ramp on a temporary basis to satisfy the immediate need for hangar space. 5. The Board considered any new business. The Board expressed concern about the filling of the hirport Manager position in a timely manner. They were informed about the procedures for hiring. The Board was again concerned with how they would participate in the hiring process considering the close working relationship between the board and the Manager. They suggested Oct informal interviews with the Board or their representative and the top candidates for the position migl-,t he apprnpr.iate, Rich S;<:!ls a „1' c!:eck this possibility and contact the Board Chairman at a later date. The Board suggested some changes in the wording of the job descrip-. tion for clarification. 6. The Board met in Executive Session to discuss legal and real estate matters. The Board reconvened in open session. With no further business, the Board adjourned at 7:40 P.M. air2 't CITY CON CIL_REPOR FORMAT TO i MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL mf" , , FROM4. LLOYD Vo HARRELL, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Solicitation Project by the Denton Tennis Association RECOtUNDATION: Approve use of $25,000 in City funds from the Recreation Fund to match funds solicited by the Denton Tennis Association. SUf1 %RY' This development will provide an office, restrooms, and a covered patio to get in out of the sun. Total construction cost is estimated to be $400000, and the City will be responsible for connecting all utilities, estimated at $5400. BACKGR4t1ND i The Tennis/Golf Center is used by the public seven days a week and 52 weeks a year. At the present time, we are renting a trailer to act as an office, and there are no restrooms or covered areas available to the public. PROGRAMS D PA TM T OR GROUPS AFFECTED i The Tennis Program would have increased facilities to better serve the public. ,SCAL IMPACT; $20,000 construction 5,000 utilities $25,000 total To be matched by $20,000 by the Denton Tennis Association. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: LLOYD V. HARRELL CITY PIANAGE,R PREPARED BY1 Steve Brinkman TITLE Director, Parks and R creation APPROVED; TITLE ton CITY of DENTON, TEXAS Civic Conhr / $01 Be rcKfnney / Donlon, 1oxaa 70001 M E M O R A N D U M TOt Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager FROM$ Steve Brinkman, Director, Parks and Recreation DATEo September 24, 1986 SUBJECT: Expenditures from Recreation Fund The Denton Tennis Association would like to undertake a fundraising project to help us pay for an office/pro shop. This would be located at the Tennis/Golf Center next to North Lakes Recreation Center. The 725 square foot facility would include room for an office, pro shop, restrooms,_ equipment storage, and would have a covered patio around the building. Total construction cost of the facility is estimated to be approximately $40,000, and they would tike us to pay for half of that cost. We would also need to pay for providing all utility hookups which would run about $5,000. This would make our total commitment $25,000. The Recreation Fund was set up to manage and account for all self-supporting programs. We have traditionally used the surplus funds from this account to help upgrade our facilities. We have approximately $150,000 in surplus funds that are available in the Recreation Fund balance which builds up because of programs like the Tennis/Golf Center. The facility will also enable us to expand our pro shop operation and get rid of the large trailer we are now renting at the site. Bec.iuse this expense was not a part of the budgeted amount for the Recreation Fund, we would need to handle this cost in a similar fashion as the development of the driving range. In that instance, we had Council authorize the purchase of the supplies and contractual work necessary from the Fund. The Tennis Association would like to begin their solicitations drive, and we would not make any expenditures until their fundraising project was completed successfully and bids had been secured. old Donlon Parka and Aecrostlon / Donlon, Toxas / (017) OB&ORM What we need to do at this point is to notify Council of the Denton Tennis Association's interest and get their approval to spend the funds if the fundraising project is successful. The Park Board has reviewed this request and supports the Denton Tennis Association in its effort. C-OL Stave Brinkman HEM00701 I ig%ro"tig CITY of DNTONt TOMS cwro OMW I $01 E. Mara+nor / DontOn, Taxes YOM CITY OF DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 25, 1986 5:30 P.M. SENIOR CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Campbell, Chairman Gary Kirchoff, Vice Chairman Rita Pilkey Catherine Bell Willie Hudspeth STAFF PRESENT: Steve Brinkman, Director, Parke and Recreation Joy Hesch,"Senior Secretary 11 MEETING CALLED ro ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mike Campbell, Chairman. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM LAST MEETING On a motion by Gary Kirchoff, second of Rita Pilkey, the minutes of the meeting of June 30, 1986, were approved. No meeting was held in July due to a quorum not being present. III. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BOARD MEMBER Steve administered the oath of office to Catherine Bell, new member. IV. OLD BUSINESS 1. Capital Improvements Projects Update: ' . • ' ~*L~CYY1.t~ ~l~ e.~~IGE'1~t2*.L /KL '%i'filL1~~ ' . . , . Denton Parks and Ronreatlon / Denton, Taxes / (817180404070 Parke and Recreation Board Meeting August 25, 1986 Page - 1 Steve distributed a summary of the projects that the Parks and Recreation Department would be involved with. After a discussion, the consensus of the Board was that three 20,000 square feet recreation centers as opposed to two 30,000 square feet centers would be preferable. Also, the Board was enthusiastic about the possibility of improving the athletic facilitiei and expansion of the senior center. VI. NEW BUSINESS 11 Athletic Program Changes: Steve told the Board of plans for the department to take over administrative functions of the youth sports leagues with the -exception of boys' baseball. The associations would still be heavily involved through their commissioners. Mike voiced the opinion that the City should give good reasons for taking over some associations and not others. He also felt that people from the associations should be invited to come before the Board. The discussion was taLled until the next meeting which the associations will be invited to'attend. 2. Beautification Update: Steve discussed a future landscape ordinance and said there would be a meeting with developers prior to drafting an ordinance. 3. Review Request to Developers: A paper was distributed which looked at one square mile areas and what is needed for park development. The priority areas included 37 sites and 311 acres. The suggestion has been made by the developers that they be allowed to make donations to the City which would do away with a mandatory dedication ordinance. The consensus of the Board was to look at all 37 sites to see what developers can come up with in 90 days. The developers should have a spokeperson meet with the Board within that 90 days. VI. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Election of officers: Rita moved and Willie seconded that hike and nary remain as the officears. The motion carried unanimously. Park• and Recreation Board fleeting August 25s 1966 Page - 3 Z. Tennis Building: Steve said the Denton Tennis Association would like to have a solicitation drive to raise funds for a tennis facility. The city would have to come up with $20,000 in matching funds and would have to handle utilities hookup if the Association can generate about X20,000-45,000. The Board concurred that this would be desirable. 3. Amphitheatres Steve reported that construction will be started soon on the amphitheatre in Civic Center Park with the $20,000 donated by the Denton Benefit League. we will need to go out on a solicitation drive for funds to complete the project. 4. Other Projects: Steve said the miniature golf course on I-35 is for sale, and the department is looking into purchasing the equipment with the idea of placing it in Civic Center Park next to pool. He mentioned also the possibility of developing a BMX course at North Lakes and softball/baseball automatic pitching machine for revenue producing projects. The consensus of the Board was that these are good ideas and should generate a considerable amount of revenue. VII. ADJOURN On a motion by Rita Pilkey, second of Gary Kirchoffs the meeting was adjourned. 1 I LEFT' SIDE RIGHT SIDE 13 a t ' r OPaN 0 PATIO ,a4 MsK D 13ATN RiGiPT10N 10 couwritR 1 I %A LL 1N cov6fiEa WOMEN j CoVitRit) ~0` PATIO 4ATF1 3 I grl0 ~ t p I o + ❑ I~ i0 i d ! ! OF'F1Cl j , V 10 LGt~N C.C i r Aft lsA ' e t ~ i I Al i ~ jlrJF?nG~ t I I CCV=IR E0 'D- OR I AREA H=A7,90 "la+• _«vtsa0Aav, 93:+ e.l.FN Orr/. 4 1, 3~ De)oR Sr-OSOUL'i L,qoM4ew S:H 1 3016$ A.,,. Ga►ia+o~A~o 8t A ~?R~.p ~ASS• MPa~yJ V1~Ha~.. ;..~:1 irw~.eAdn °f°'3'}, s V-,€m .f 5554".gY.'•9 5' 'V } r:'^"` 3 r. A,.f ..v. :Y':y October 7, 1966 TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL RELL CITY MANAGER Fti0fls LLOYD V, HAR SUBJECTS Review Voting Procedure RECEkt1EHDAT I Ott ; ' N/A ice: Various voting methods will be reviewed and discussed. ACKGRO_ Ms. Per Council request. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUES AFFECTED: City Council, City Secretary FISCAL IMPA Leas than $1,008. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: LLOYD V, HARRELL CITY MANAGER PREPARED BY: Steve Brinkman TITLE Director, Parks and Recreation APPROVED: M TITLE • M , OI T X W A<NTONr TEXAS ~ClVle CMhr / i! t MaKMw~ay / Ow~Mn, Tiiaa !8!4 t NNNNNO~ M E M O R A N D U M TO: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager FROM: Steve Brinkman, Director, Parks and Recreation DATE: September 24, 1986 SUBJECT: -Voting Machine for Council After investigating the alternatives for developing a system for voting by Council members, we have found that the most common include: 1) The existing method used by Council at this time. 2) A show of hands after an indication of yea, or nay by the City Secretary. 3) A voting machine with a voting system that identifies the voter. The Utility Department and Traffic Engineering have indicated that they can design and construct a system for less than $1,000. This machine could also include a system to let those who are addressing Council know how mush time they have remaining and when their time is up. We feel it would be possible to construct this system within 30 days. „w Steve Brinkman HEM0O724 Denton Parks and Roarestion / Denton, Texas 1817)000.8270 Oak"" mom i S 40 O O r roQ c.~t-w O C Mg. Ftt1 'Tt M1 E L! 6t4 r (1 a of) 1} Council watlts,the board tivisible to citizens and Council members. _2) Basic procedure (proposed) A. All voters vote at the same time. B. After all have had time to vote, the City clerk will push a button or switch which will display all votes (yes or no) beside each voter's name. C. The City clerk will then record all votes and cut the display switch off. A. The board is now ready for the next vote. 3) Another item the Council would like to have is a lighted time device for timing speeches. A. This device would allow for a time light displaying that there is one'thinute to finish a speech. Once the time is totally elapsed the buzzer would sound, ending the speech. 4) Bob Nelson stated that his staff can help. 5) Council wound like this project started as soon as possible. i 1 mrtig& 71) AdNl~ CITYe/DMION, MUS etwh wrier / sot jL ra kmwy / ocean, Thies rawt dmmm~ M E M O R A N D U M TOs Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager FROMs Bruce Henington, Superintendent of Building Operations DATES July 21, 1986 SUBJECTS Voting Procedure We have telephoned several cities to find out what type of voting procedure they use when voting at a council meeting. Almost all cities use some type of a mechanical system to tally votes and then displaying the outcome on a public display board, Only one city would recommend purchasing such a system due to the complex mechanical problems. The City of garland solved this problem (mechanical failures) by having their, own traffic department build and install their mechanical display system. The City of Carrollton has a very simple system which eliminates the purchase of expensive equipment. They just use a show of hands for the yes and no vote in a parliamentary fashion. First they have a motion, then a second, a call for all in favor (voting simultaneously), and a call for all not in favor (voting simultaneously). if necessary# we would be happy to assist our traffic department (which has the talent) to design a simple system to operate and maintain. r r Bruce Hen ngton 00667 ' • . . ~ ' • eJ ~CL~~~ ~5►4~ t/I~GE'aRti e,1~Q~ ~ ~~4'LJ'~rZ • • • 1 • ' Denton barks end Rsersstion / Denton, Tearss / (81 !J key-i!>'0 i CITY O DENr4N, 79"S Civle ft for i a: f & WOKMn y i a+r! T&x" 70801 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Betty McKean, Assistant city manager FROM: Bruce Henington Superintendent of Building Operations DATEt September 24, 1986 SUBJECT: Voting Procedure T have discussed the attached proposed board/procedure with Jerry Clark. He will, along with Bob Nelson's staff, -iesign another board/procedure as per the last request from CMO. He will have the City Manager and Council approve the new design and the new procedure before construction. Bruce Henington MEM00723 • 01 Do t n Parka and Aocroation / Denton, oxas / f 817) Otte•dl7n n SEP24FO September 23, 1986 Ms. Charlotte Allen City Secretary 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Ms. Allen, This is to confirm that the Denton 7-Eleven stores will be making a charitable presentation to Friends of the Family, Denton SPAN and Denton YMCA at the City Council meeting on Tuesd,,.y, October 7 at 7:00 p.m. We have already notified the organizations, and they will have representatives on hand to accept the checks. Thank you for allowing us to publically recognize these worthy organizations, I If you need to contact me for any reason, my number is 214/980-8055, Cordially, I STEVE PIERCE Public Relations North Texas Division of 7-Eleven SP/th cc: Terry Pack, District Manager Mike Callahan, Supervisor 7•Sieven Stores I Division 1649 One Forest Plaza / 12200 Park Central Drive ! Suits 600 / Dallas, Texan 78261 / Phone (214) 960.6066 CO" THE 866T'HUND l*3 C09POPIATION - ♦u i aM~ ri _ RC • _:4 f.. 1 -["(r7vaPx .r DATE: 00/13/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUSJECTt SAFETY AWARDS RECOMMENDATION: Propose and issue the enclosed certificates for the City of Denton, David Scott, Joan Davis, John Truitt, Lois Scobee, and Robert Morrison from National Safety Council and Texas Safety Association. 8U_ MMARY: All individuals named above have bran given awards for their tremendous efforts in traffic safety. Also, the City of Denton has received Awards of Honor from both organizations. BACKGROUND: This has been one of the best safety years in Denton. These awards reflect highest honors for all employees who have made these awards possible. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The morale of all. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. If pursued w'.th an active safety plan and program, the City could lower their insurance rates and premiums. Respectfully vubmitted: Lloyd Harrell Prepared by: City Manager J~4. 84a+ D. Litma , r. Emergency Management Coordinator Ap proved: / :2 Z Bil ng o Assistant Director of Public Works 1318/1 City Council Minutes July 1, 1986 The Council conves::,d into the Work Session at 5r00 p.m, in the Tivil Defense Roos. PRESENTr Mayor Stephenal Mayor Pro TOM Alfordr Council Members Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger City Manager, City Attorney, city Secretary ABSENTr None 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss an appointment to the Texas Municipal Power Agency Board of Directors. 2. Executive Session The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss an appointment to the Texas Municipal Power Agency Board of Directors. The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENTt Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tom Alford; Council Members Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger City Manager, City Attorney, Assistant City Manager ABSENT: None 1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 30 1986. McAdams motion, Chew second to approve the Minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. 2. The council was to receive an appearance by Mr. Carl Young requesting approval for an extension of the park curfew and the curfew for sound amplified equipment until 12.00 midnight at Fred Moore Park on July 4 and 5, 1986. This item was removed from the agenda by the petitioner, Mr. Carl Young. 3. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of Ana Rocco Pena requesting an amendment to an existing 14.057 acre planned development located on the east side of Riney Roar] adjacent and south of U.S. Highway 77 and north of Windsor Drive at a point approximately 220 feet east of the intersection of Riney Road and Windsor Drive. The current planned development parmits the development of thirty-one (31) single family dwellings and one retirement/recovery center. The proposed amendment would permit the development of a church on a 5.8 acre portion of the single family site. 2-1798 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Greg Edwards, Metroplex Engineering representing Ms. Pena, spoke in favor stating that the change in the site plan was the area designated on the overhead projection as church use. This was designated as a single family ores with approximately 81000 square foot lots on the earlier planned development. Under the present zoning ordinance, had the property been zoned SF-16, the church could have purchased the property, not filed a site plan, not restricted the area of the use, not provided large amounts of open, space and would not have to come before the council. As the property was zoned planned development, these proposed changes did have to come back before the Council. Several options were City of Denton city council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 19s6 Page Two available but this particular one gave the 04 the most control. Discussions had been held with the neighbors and his firm and client had tried to address their concerns. He felt this plan addressed and continued to address a lot of the concerns that were made in the initial planned development, The people on Riney Road had expressed, concern about the fast traffic on Riney Road. He felt that this amendment to the planned development would improve the traffic situation in the Immediate area of Riney Road. Another concern was the drainage. The initial proposal with the single family development would reduce the drainage problem by 10%. This proposal would reduce the problem by 20%. A church did have a contract to purchase the property Znd would be responsible tar the various improvements. Mr. Edwards summarized by stating that he felt this would be an asset to the community. Ms. Ana Rocco Pena, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that since the original planned development was approved in May, she had been through a hard time. The value of the single family property had declined and she was unable to sell 22 of the lots. Staff had requested land to use in back of the proposed nursing home for a retention pond, The Seventh Day Adventist Church has purchased 7 acres for a future church site contingent upon the approval of this zoning petition. The church would be located next to the proposed nursing home and would not disturb the Northridge neighborhood. Thar-, had been some small confusion with Mr. Dane regarding a drainage For Mr. Dane was requesting a statement in writing that his plan for the drainage would be used and she felt the engineering plan should be used. Council Member Chew asked it the purchase of the property was contingent upon the approval of this zoning amendment to the original planned uevelopment, Me. Pena responded yes, Mr, Bill Weist, representing the governing body of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, spoke in favor stating that his church held title to the property subject to this zoning, They were aware of the concerns and objections which has been raised and would willingly meet and work with the neighbors to solve any problems. The church was in need of a location for a new facility. Funds were available for the construction and he felt the church would compliment the YMCA, park area and residential uses in place, Council Member McAdams asked Mr, Weist why the church felt they needed to move. Weist responded that the current location was in a very highly commercialized area. Traffic was a problem plus the property was quite valuable and it was better to sell the lot and relocate the church facility to a less commercial area, council Member McAdams stated that the neighbors had been very concerned and had not had an opportunity to speak with representatives from the church, Mr Cordray, 1509 Riney Road, spoke in favor stating that his con^ern was the street and something must be done on Riney Road due to the YMCA and other developments. He felt this amendment would be an improvement. Mr. Paul Jones, 1409 Windsor, speaking for the Knights of Columbus, stated that he did not know if he was in favor or in opposition but rather was opposed to the planneu development as approved in May. The concern was regarding the closing and cul-de-sac on Riney Road. The Knights of Columbus aid not know of the petition as they are located more than 200 feet away from the zoning area. There was a dangerous curve on Riney Road leading to the Knights of Columbus hall and he felt the original planned development petition affected the traffic going to the hall. 7-7 city of Denton city council minutes Meeting of July 1, 1986 Page Three Ms, Eileen Lockhart, Northridge, spoke in opposition :Mating that when she built her hone in this area, it was with the intention of locating in a single family, well maintained area, she was now concerned about various intrusions into the neighborhood, traffic problems and water hazardsq The neighborhood was in the midst of.. institutionalisation with 11 churches and this was a proposal for yet another. The original planned development was to have single family dwellings. The neighbors had met with Ms. Pena and had finally agreed to the proposed nursing home. in addition to the proposed nursing home by Ms. Pena, there were 3 other nursing homes, a nutrition center, & day care center on Mingo Road, Evers Park, North Lakes, Evers school, the YMCA and the Optimist Gym in the area. These facilities all created traffic problems. The land had been badly disturbed by the widening of Windsor Drive and the neighbors wanted something in writing about the proposed drainage plan for this new amendment to the planned development, Mr. Ralph Morrison, Northridge, spoke in opposition stating that the neighborhood had been wrestling with this problem for 3 years. Representatives had met dith Me. Pena, without Ms. Pena, with the Planning and Zoning Commission and with the City Council. One primary concern was drainage, As of this date, they had not seen the proposed development plan in its entirety ano were concerned regarding future changes. The neighbors were also concerned about the church as representatives from the church had not met with theme They had no assurance that the church wocla actually be built or if yet another amendment to the original planned development would be requested, Council Member McAdams askeo if the neighbors coulo receive assurances that an ordinary church would be built, would there still be objections to the number of institutions In the area. Morrison responded yes. Mr. Donala Daves, 616 Northriage, spoke in opposition stated that his primary concern was the water run off. Council Member McAdams left the meeting. The Mayor allowed the petitioner 5 minutes for rebuttal, Mr, Greg Edwarda, Metroplox Engineering, spoke in rebuttal stating that there had been mixed responses in favor and in opposition to the church building. Also, regarding the change in Riney Road, this alignment had been approved to improve the safety. The proposal did meet the intensity standards as set by the City. Council member McAdams joined the meeting, Edwaras further stated that, 1f the developer could not meet standards on the drainage plan, it would not be approved by the City. An additional condition to the planned development had been added to take care of Mr. Dane's concerns regarding drainage, The developer had agreed to conditions to protect the neighborhood and the community, The Mayor closed the public hearing, Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that 26 reply forms had been mailed wich 1 returned in favor and 4 returned in opposition. In the analysis of the proposal, the one imp,)rtant factor was the intensity. This proposed amendment would replace 22 single family lots with the church facility. This did not violate the City intensity standard. Staff did have a question regarding Raney Road in that the original planned development as approved in May container, a condition for Medication of ;:fight-of-way and a cul-de-sac. The concern was that City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1986 Page Your these conditions would not be incluaed in the amendment request. Regarding drainage, there was a condition in this proposal as well as in the original planned development that drainage would not be allowed to flow across the north line of the Dane property. These problems were normally handled curing the platting process and any. drainage plan would have to comply with the City standards. The neighbors had expressea concern about what would happen on the remaining property. All changes to the original planned development woul.a have to go back through the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, Me. Spivey concluded by stating that she had no knowledge of any future plans. The orainance before the City council at this time was for the church only. Council Member McAdams asked if the original planned development as approved was for 31 single family lots and would this amendment take 22 of those lots. Spivey responded yes. Council Member Alexander asked if, since this would double the intensity of the area, would it still be permissible due to the vacant areas. Spivey responded yes, Council Member Alexander stated that it appeared that any future development on the vacant property would put the area over the intensity standard. Council Member eupxins asked staff to shave the relationship betwetr the Northridge rddilion and this development on the overhead projection. Council Member McAdams stated that her concern wan that the zoning and development of this area had gone on for a long time. A plan has finally been agreed upon, which was the plan in the current planned development, flow there was a consideration of going from 31 single family sites to 9. The original plan was being chipped away by one amendment afier another, She was also concerned about the fact that the people in the neighborhood had n°t had contact with the church, other than through Me. Peru. While the church should have been actively participating in these discussion, she could underntana the reluctance on the part of the neighborhood. Council Member Riddlesperqer stated tnat he remeribered that the council did practically promise the residents of Northridge to keep the area single family. He was disturbed to see so many institutions in the area, Council Member Alexander stateu that it the church was approved and was established, it would be difficult for the Planning and Zoning Comnission and/or City Council to refuse a child care center, etc. in the future, Mayor Stephens asked staff to explain why the plan fur realignment of Riney Road had been chosen. Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, stated that it would allow better eight distances with the 'T' intersection. Mayor Stephens asked it the renaming of the road was no,, an issue here. Svehla responded that was correct. Council member McAdams stated that the council must be aware that only a small portion of this parcel would be used for the church, This might suggest future changes to the planned development. She felt the neighborhood had a right to know exactly what to expect. i city of Denton City Council minutes meeting of July 1, 1966 page Five McAdams motion, Alexandei second to deny the proposed ordinance. On roil call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "nay," Alford "aye,' Rfadle9per9er "aye," Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried 6 to 1 with Council Member Hopkins casting the 'nay" vote. B. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of Edward Podoba, Janusz Podoba, aid Elizabeth podoba requesting approval of a site plan for a 2,8 acre tract located at the northeast corner of U,B. Highway 77 and Falb %adow street. The property is more particularly described is Unit One, Block One, of the Denton North Addition. The property is zoned planned development (PD-8) for general retail land use. If approved, the site plan will permit the development of a 25,100 square foot retail center. Z-1802 The Mayor opened the public hearing, Mr. Edward Podoba, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that this would be a 25,000 to 26,000 square feet facility and would be developed in three phases. The first to be developed would be the largest and it was possible that the second and third phase would be developed simultaneously. The developers wanted the project to blend into the community and the plan includeo well executed landscaping. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that this was a 3.0 acre tract requested for planned development z.ining, The general concept had been approved and the petitioners were requesting specific plan approval via this ordinance. Mayor Stephens asked regarding the curb cuts. Spivey responded that the developers were proposing 2 curb cuts on Highway 77. Assuming the proposed land use with gasoline pumps was approved, 2 curb cuts would be needed. It the gasoline pumps were deleted, only 1 curb cut would be necessary, The petitioners were also requesting 2 curb curs on Fallneadow, which was as residential area. Staff was recommending that; 1 of these be removed. The corner clearance was adequate to meet the subdivision rules and regulations and staff telt 1 curb cut would be enough. Council Member McAuams asked the petitioner why he telt he needed the 2 curb cuts on Fallmeadow. Podoba responded for safety and traffic reasons. One of the cuts would be used for delivery access. Signs would be posted at the regular entrance and exit. This dad comply with all the the City rules and regulations, Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, reported that the Planning and zoning commission had recommended the 2 curb cuts on Highway 77 due to the gasoline pumps. This was done to facilitate maneuverability around the pumps. However, Failmendow was a residential area and staff was recommending only the north curb cut for delivery only. 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a site plan for a 2.8 acre tract located at the northeast corner of U.S. Highway 77 and Fal?.meadow Street, The folle,wing ordinance was presentedi City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1986 Page Six NO. 86-12: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANkID DEVELOPMENT DETAILED PLAN FOR 2.8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF U. S. HIGHWAY 77 AND FALLMEADOW STREETt PROVIDING FOR A. PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM /.MOUNT OE #1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFt AND PROVIDING FOR AN E/dECTIVE DATE. Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance with one curb out on Fallseadow. On roll call vote, McAdams *ayer' Alexander 'aye,* Hopkins layer' Alford 'aye," Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'eye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. C, Petition of A. Ben Pinnell, Jr. requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the light industrial (LI) district on 11,437 acres and the removal of specific use permit (S-173) on the remainder of the 29.62 acre tract, The property is located east of Mayhill Road and north of Foster Road and is show:% in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the light industrial (LI) district by the City of Denton zoning ordinance. 2-1804 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Ben Pinnell, the petitioner, spoke 1,~ favor stating that he had concluded a land exchange with the City and had discoverer that the property was zoned for a wastewater treatment plant. He was asking for rezoning. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that this property was the alto of a land trade and had a specific use permit in place to overlay light industrial zoning, Mr. Pinnell was requesting liyht industrial zot,ing on the entire parcel. This did not violate Any Denton Development Guide p,~licies and the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval. The following ordinance was presented: NO. 86-122 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS, AS SAME SPAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NU. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 11.437 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE GIDEON WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT HO. 1330, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN= TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OLIO CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTYt PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $10000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF PROVIDING FOR A SEVERALILITY CLAUSE) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Chew motion, McAdams secono to adopt the or-,finance. On rol' call vcte, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander Oaye,' Hopkins 'aye," Alford *aye," Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens *&ye.' Motion carried unanimously. 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the light industrial (LI) district on 11.437 acres and the removal of specific use permit (S-173) on the remainder of the 29.62 acre track located east of Mayhill Road end north of Foster Road, City of Denton city council minutes Meeting of July 1, 1966 Page Seven D, The Council held a public hearing on the petition of Jay Balentine requesting a change In zoning from the planned development district (PD-60) to the single family (SF-7) district, The property is located east of Audrs Lane and north of Paisley Street and more fully described as Lot 220 Block B, Lee Meadows. Addition, Section 1. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the single family (SF-7) district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. Z-lbli The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr, Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, spoke in favor stating that this request was for that portion of planned development (PD-60) which was set as a green belt and his client was asking for single family (SF-7) zoning in order to request a day care center. This area had been designated for a private park but this could not be used. The Parks Department could not use the area for a city park. This rezoning had to be accomplished first prior to requesting the day care center use. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that this was a portion of PD-60 The ordinance stated that there must be a homeowner's association to maintain the park but this was unworkable. Three reply forms had been mailed with une returned in favor and zero returned to opposition, The following ordinance was presented; N0. 86-123 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, rS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-I, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO LOT 22, BLOCK B OF THE LEE MEADOWS ADDITION, SECTION I) TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIUNATION FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO SINGLE FAMILY "SF-7" CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $1,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFr PROVIDING POR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSEi AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, McAdams seconu to adopt the ordinance. on roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Alford "aye," Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew "aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. E. The Cuunc:l held a public hearing on the petition of Amos Schwartz Construction Company, Inc, requesting an amendment to a planned development (PD-60). The property is located east of Audra Lane and north of Paisley Street and is more fully described as Lee Meadows Adoition, Sections I and II. It the amendment is approved, the following changes will be made: Front Yard Setback - 25 feet Rear Yard Setback - 30 feet Side Yard Setback - Minimum of 6 feet Side Yard Setback - Minimum of 1 foot Minimum Separation Between Structures - 7 feet Eliminate Private Park Requirements Z-1805 The Mayor opened the public hearing, r. tea.-•'. ' i'. r . ; < City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1986 Page Eight Mr. Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, spoke in favor stating that the the intent of the request was to define exsittly where buildings could be located on the lot in the existing planet od development. No one spoke in opposition.. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that the original ordinance had been vague and a problem had arisen when the construction company had requested building permits, The project was currently under construction, There had been 17 reply forms mailed with 1 returned in favor. The Council considerea adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to a planned development (PD-60). (Z-1805) The following ordinance was presenteds NO. b6-124 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1F AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 13,4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED EAST OF AUDRA LANE AND NORTH OF PAISLEY STREET, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO PROVIDE FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THAT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CREATED BY ORDINANCE NO. 83-78 BY REDUCING THE ACREAGE INCLUDED THEREINI AMENDING THE CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO SAID DISTRICT, APPROVING A REVISED DETAILED PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICTI PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF] AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Alexander motion, Chew second to adopt the urdinance, On roll call vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander "aye," Hopkins 'aye," Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council held a public hearinq on the petition of Jay Balentine requesting a specific use permit for a day care center. The property is located east of Auora Lane and north of Paisley Street and more fully described as Lot 22, Block B, Lee Meadows Addition, Section I, If approved, the specific use permit would allow the operation of a day care center in a single family (SF-7) zoned area, S-190 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, spoke in favor stating that the property was located near the Robert E. Lee Elementary School, The petitioner felt a day care center in this area would be an asset. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that 3 reply forms had been mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 returned in opposition. This had been a complicated request intertwined with the two previous requests, Staff felt day care center use was reasonable and logical due to the location near a residential areal however, this should be closely controlled. Five criteria must be met. The area was 514 under standard by current use but 26 over standard by current zoning. The petitioner had lowerea the number of children Lo be kept in the day care center from 100 to 40. city of Denton city Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1966 Page Nina 1. The Council was to have considered adoption of an ordinance approving a specific use permit for a day care center on Lot 220 Block 6, Lee Meadows Addition, Section I. Debra Drayovitch, city Attorney, reported that this ordinance would, have to be considered at a future Council meeting so proper legal notification could be given. McAdams motion, Chow second to approve the request and to direct staff to bring the ordinance back to Council on July 15. Motion carried unanimously. G, The council held a public hearing on the petition of Hammett i Nash, Inc., representing Leon Kimes, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the light industrial (LI) district on a 10,54 acre tract located on the south side of East McKinney Street (FM 426) approximately 300 feet west Of Bellaire Sti;aet, The property is further described as a tract in the M. Yoachum survey, Abstract 1442. If the request is approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the light industrial district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. z-1801 Mr. Mike Pennington, representing the owners, presented a petition and spoke in favor stated that the request was for rezoning to light industrial, The surrounding area on one side of the property was currentl;/ zoned light industrial. Approximately 300 acres around the property was undeveloped so that this request would not put the area over an accaptabie intensity level, staff had asked his client to request a planned development; howaver, he had felt it would be detrimental to expend the funds to prepare engineering plans, etc. and then have the zoning request denied. No onb spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported tl,at 15 reply forms had been mailed with i returned in favor, 1 returned in opposition and 1 returned as undecided, The first basic issue with this request was thci intensity. The area was designated low intensity and was already over standard by 141 with existing zoning. Another concern of staff was potential land uses which could be utilized in a light industrial zoned districts the area was currently basically residential. The parcel was located at an entrance to the City and Council had expressed an interest in maintaining an attractive appearance at these points. The petitioner had first requested commercial zoning and then light industrial, staff had suggested a planned development but the petitioner did not agree. This proposed zoning, if approved, could result in detrimental land uses, Mayor Pro Tem Alford asked if staff had mentioned to the petitioner the possibility of various conditions attached to the zoning, Spivey responded that the parcel would have to be a planned development before conditions to development could be attached to the zoning ordinance, Riddlesperger motion, McAdams second to deny the petition. Ms. Jo Nash, realtor representing the petitioner, stated that staff had informer her client that a fee of $1,800 would be required to file a plat. This was not affordable so the request for rezoning had been changed from commercial to light Industrial. Motion to deny carried 6 to 1 with Mayor Pro Tem Alford casting the Onayo vote. city of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1966 Page Ten 4. The Council considered Acceptance and approval of Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for a five year utilities capital improvement Plan. Mr. Hill Claiborne, chairman of the Planning and zoning Commission,. introduced Mr. Roland Laney* Chairman of the Public Utilities Board, to present the recommendation. Mr. Laney reported that the 5 year Capital Improvement Plan for utilities was based on a projected growth rate of 5% in 1987 and 19881 41 in 1989 and 19901 and 31 in 1991. A major expenditure in the electric utility would be hydroelectric generating plants at Lake Lewisville and Lake Ray Roberts. Costs were being obtained to determine viability of the proposed units. She major expenditures anticipated in the water/wastewater utility were A new treatment plant for Lake Ray Roberts and an expansion of the existing plant in 1991. Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, presented an overhead projection listing the major projects and their associated cost estimates. McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation on the utility Capital Improvement Program projects. Motion carried unanimously. 5. The Council considered acceptance of Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for a five year non-utilities Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Bill Claiborne, Chairman of the Planning and zoning commission, reported that the commission saw the Capital Improvement Plan dollars being distributed to all parts of Denton to help the City. Input on potential projects had been received from citizens via a nail-out, from both universities as well as from the City executive staff. The Planning and Zoning Commission was recommending that no modification or reduction in the plan take place. The Planning and Zoning Commission had asked staff to categorize request and had encouraged staff to look at projects which might be completed by City workers. Capital Improven~.nts Projects were either funded by ad valorem taxes or by bond issues, A unique situation had developed this year in that the District Engineer from the State Department of Highways and Transportation had provided Input. A letter had been received which stated that, if the City of Denton would invest $3 to $4 million in street/bridge improvements in concert with the Highway Department, the net result would be $16 to $18 million worth of improvements. Claiborne then presentee an overhead projection of the various proposed projects, city manager Lloyd Harrell reported for clarification that the previous 5 year Capital improvement Projects would be completed in 1986 and a bond issue must be approved to replenish funds for any future impr,,)vements. There were various issues involved with these recommendations such as signalization improvemonts and new recreation canters. Staff would recommend that the Council accept these reports and appoint a citizens group to review the CIP program prior to bringing it before the voters. It was imperative to have extensive community input and involvement, Staff felt it was extremely important for Council to consider a broad based Blue Ribbon Committee to review the issues. McAdams motion, Chew second to accept the report and the comments by the City Manager and to schedule a work session on this issue. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Consent Agenda McAdams motion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. ti } city of Denton city council minutes meeting of July 1, 1966 Page Eleven A. Bids and Purchase Ordersc 1. Bid 4 9624 - Traffic signal controller 2. Bid t 9645 - One ton cab chassis 3. Bid 1 9626 - Contract - concrete work 4. Bid 6 9627 - CD80 paving improvement - Bushey Street 5. Purchase Order t 73736 to gone Engineering in the amount of $19,362.50 6. Purchase Order # 74022 to General :lectric Company in the amount of $450660.00 S. Plate and Replats: 1. A proval of preliminary and final replat of the Alex Robertson Addition, Lot 4, Block 15. (The Planning and Zoning Commisston recommends approval.) 2. Approval of preliminary and final replat of the Expressway Industrial Park ",edition, Lot it Block S. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of preliminary plat of the Keenan Farms Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of.. preliminary replat of the Kiowa Trail Estates Additione Lots 1-10, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.) 5. Approval of preliminary plat of the Northwood Addition, 12th Installment. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.) 6. Approval of final replat of the Pace's Crossing Addition, Lot It Block 1, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 7. Approval of final replat of The Residence 11 Addition, (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.) Ite•n 9.8 was moved forward in the agenda order, 9, Resolution: 8. The Council considered approval of a resolution approving a contract for the collection of delinquent taxes. John McGranee Director of Finance, reported that Requests for Proposals had been sent to B firms with responses received from 4. All proposals had been reviewed and the firms had been allowed to make oral presentations to staff. Staff was recommending the contract for collection of delinquent taxes be awarded to Heard, Goggaan, Blair, Williams and Harrison. Mr. Goggaan stated that his firm was the largest and most successful tax collection service in Texas. The following resolution was presented: 01 City Of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1986 Page Twelve R0$0LUT BE IT RESOLVED BY TUC COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS: That the Mayor be., and he is hereby authorized, to execute. on behalf of the City of Denton a contract for the collection of delinquent taxes between the City of Denton and Heard, Goggaan, Blair, Williams and Harrison. PASSED AND APPROVED this the lat day of July, 1986, PAY STEPHENSO MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE A L N, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SY: Riddlesperger motion, Alford second that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Alford "aye," Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew "aye," ano Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously, The Council then returned to the regular agenda order. 7. The council held a discussion of Stuart-Seline paving/ drainage project (Bic # 9609). Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, reported that a portion of this project had not been funded] however, a private developer was willing to assist, Council could designated 0100,000 from the street bond issue savings. Alford motion, Chew second to approve the funding concept. Motion carried unanimously, 8. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. The following ordinance was presented: NO, 86-125 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOREI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "eye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye,' Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously, B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for publ,r. works or improvements. City of Denton city council minutes meeting of July 1, 1986 Pegs Thirteen The following ordinance was presentedr NO. 86-126 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE 8108 AND PROVIDING FOR. THE AWARD Of CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTSI PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOREI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roil call Vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,' Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Notion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. The following ordinance was presented: NO. 86-127 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF brATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS CF COMPETITIVE BIDS: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. on roll call votes McAdams "dye,' Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye,' Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance naming a public park as Martin Luther King, Jr. Paris. The following ordinance was presented: N0. 86-128 AN ORDINANCE NAMING A PUBLIC PARK AS MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PARK; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. E. The Council considered adoption or an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 142 acres being part of the Morreau Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, and the Giaeon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and beginning approximately .9 mile east of Mayhill Road and ending approximately 2,000 feet east of Trinity Road. A-35 The following ordinance was presented: NO. 86-129 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE (CITY OF DENTON, TEXASI BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 142.0 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE MORREAU FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 417, AND THE GIDEON WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 13301 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTYI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. city of Denton city council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1986 Page Fourteen McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance, on roll call vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew *aye,■ and Mayor Stephens ■aye.' Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and' service plan annexing approximately 299,83 acres between I-35E and FM 426, and being part of the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 13300 and the W. Durham Survey, Abstract 330. A-38 The following ordinance was presented: N0. 86-130 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON$ ^EXAS1 BEING ALL THAT LOTo TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 299.83 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE GIDEON WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330, AND THE W. DURHAM SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 3301 DENTON COUNTY, TEXASI CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTYI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew 'aye,■ and Mayor Stephens 'aye." Motion carried unanimously. G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving the payment of an amount not to exceed $3,000 to the Texas Municipal League to pay the cost of intervening in litigation relating to Texas water quality standards. gob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this item was before the Council in June. Concerns had been expressed by council Members regarding the position of the Texas Municipal League in this litigation. The lawsuit had been reviewed and staff was recommending approval of the ordinance. Council Member McAdams stated that she had a problem with approving a carte blanch intervention of the Sierra Club's efforts. The Texas Municipal League and the cities were speculating and only looking at worst case scenarios. The following ordinance was presented: NO. 8b-131 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PAYMENT OF AN PMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,000 TO THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE TO PAY THE COST OF INTERVENING IN LITIGATION RELATING TO TEXAS WATER QUALITY STANDARDSI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Chew motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance as written with the 31000 limit. on roll call vote, McAdams 'nay,' Alexander 'aye, Hopkins "aye,' Alford `aye," Riddlesperger 'aye,' Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stephens "nay." Motion carried 5 to 2 with Council Member McAdams and Mayor Stephens casting the 'nay" votes, H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting the dedication by dead from G. C. Ledyard, Jr,, Trustee, of that portion of certain real property situated in the J. Scott Survey, Abstract 12221 Denton County, Texas, as described in saia dedication deed, to the City of Denton, Texas, for the use of said property as a public street. Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, reported that the next three ordinances would officially acctfpt dedication of the property and { ~k City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1986 Page Fifteen would provide street dedication so that bridge work north of the airport could begin. The following ordinance was presented: NO, 86-132 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION BY DEED FROM 0. C. LEDYARDr JR., TRUSTEE, OF THAT PORTION OF CERTAIt, REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE J. SCOTT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1222, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DEDICATION DEED, TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY AS A PUBLIC STREETS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aya," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "eye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens *aye." Motion carried unanimously. I. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting the dedication by Aeed from Ed Wolski and Larry W. Frank, Trustees, of Chat portion of certain real property situated in the J. Scott survey, Abstract 1r). 1222, Denton County, Texas, as described in said dedication deed, to the City of Denton, Texas, for the use of said property as a public street. The following ordinance was presented: NO. 86-133 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION BY DEED FROM ED WJLSKI AND LARRY W. FRANK, TRUSTEES, OF THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE J. SCOTT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 12221 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DEDICATION DEED, TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY AS A PUBLIC STREETS 4ND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams *aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye,• and Mayor Stephens *aye.* Motion carried unanimously. J. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting the dedication by deed from Connell Development Company of that portion of certain real property 8'tu3ted in the Meyers Survey, Abstract 1699, G. H. Barb Survey, Abstract No, 208 and the Wm. Wilburn Survey, Abstract 1419, Denton County, Texas, as described in said dedication, deeu, to the City of Denton, Texas, for the use of said property as a public street. The following ordinance was presented: No. 86-134 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION BY DEED FROM CONNELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE MEYERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 16990 G. H. BARB SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 208 AND THE WM. WILBURN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1419, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DEDICATION DEED, TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY AS A PUBLIC STREET AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford •aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." No,,-ion carried unanimously. City of Denton city Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1966 Page Sixteen 9. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution to adopt one personnel policy: Military Service Leave 111.04 City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that this personnel policy was consistent with current practice. The following resolution was presented: R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the management and staff of the City of Denton has presented a proposed policy regarding employee rules and regulations for the Council s consiaerationa and WHEREAS, the city council desires to adopt such policy as an ott!cial policy regarding employment with the Cityr NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THATr SECTION I. The following policy, attached hereto %nd made a part hereof, is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of Denton, Texas: Military Leave (Reference No, 111.04) SECTION II. The foregoing policy is attached hereto and mad.: a part hereof and shall be filed in the official records of the city of Denton with the City Secretary. SECTION III. The Employee Rules and Regulations of 1976 adopted by Resolution of the City Council on February 1, 19770 is hereby rescinded to the extent it conflicts with the foregoing policy and with any administrative procedures and directives issued under the authority of the City council implementing the policy hereby adopted. SECTION IV, ThJZ Resolution shall become effective tmmet'iately upon its passage and approval. PASSED At'D APPROVED this the lot day of July, 1986. RAY STEPHENS, AY OR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE A=N, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: ~q;, City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1966 Page seventeen McAdams motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, McAdams 'ale,' Alexander 'aye:,' Hopkina 'ayye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger aye,' Chew 'aye,' anu mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. C, The council considered approval of a resolution designating the Animal Control Supervisor as the l.ooel health authority for the purposes of carrying out the provisionb of the Texas Rabies Control Act and the applicable ordinances of the City of Denton. City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that this was a routine item. The following resolution was presented: R B S 0 L U T I 0 N WHEREAS, Section 3.02 of Article 4477-6(a) , V.A.T.S., provides that the governing body of each City shall designate one officer to act am the local health authority for the purposes of said statutes and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texaa wishes to comply with the provisions of said statutes NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. That the Animal Control Supervisor is hereby aesignated as the local health authority for the purposes of Article 4417-6(a), V.A.T.S. (The Rabies Control Act) to carry out the prov1,91ona of the Act and the applicable ordinances of the City of Denton. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become eftective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the lot day of July, 1986. RAY STEPHENS$ MAYOn CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTt CHARLOTTE A L , CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LCOAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEVTON, TEXAS BY : McAdams motion, Alford second that the resolution be approved, On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye,' Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye." Motion carried unanimously, D. The Council considered approval of a resolution asking the members of the Texas Senate and House of Representatives to honor the commitment made in the 1984 Special Session of the Legislature to repair and imprive the stato's highways, Rick Svehia, Assistant City Manager, reported that this resolution would aak the legislators for their support and to keep the funds allocated for thin project. k r city 99 Denton city council Minutes meeting of July 1, 1966 Page Eighteen The following resolution was presented: R E S O L U T I O N WhEREASF the Texas Legislature acted in a Special Session in the summer of 1961 ,to address a crisis caused by the. deterioration of the 72,000 mile state highway systems and WHEREAS, years of neglect resulted in Texas having more obsolete and substandard roads and bridges than any other state; and WHEREAS, lack of state highway funding made it impossible for the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation to adsqquately maintain anc expand roads to serve increasing numbers of vehicles; and WHEREAS, the state's deteriorating highway network threatened the safety, economic health, and quality of life of every Texans and WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature acted with courage and wisdom to address the highway funding crisis by increasing fees and taxes paid by Texas highway users; and WHEREAS, all of the increas4 in state highway funds came from increases in the state motor fuel tax, vehicle registration fees, and vehicle sales tax; and WHEREAS, Texas highway users supported these increases in fees and taxes with the understanding that revenues would be used to maintain and improve their roads; and WHEREAS, the diversion of revenues from fees and taxes paid by highway users from the State Highway Fund to general revenues is a breach of faiths and WHEREAS, Texas voters have consistently supported the concept that those who use the highways should pay for them; NUN, THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Oi DBNTON: SECT104 1. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas ask the members of the Texas Senate and Texas House of Representatives to honor the commitment made in the 1984 Special Session of the Legislature to repair and improve the state's highways. Essential highway improvement funds must n,t be diverted to other uses. Projects to prevent triffic ac,;idents, reduce congestion, and improve mobility of all Texans must be completed without delay. SECTION 11. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the lst day of July, 1986. RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTS CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTONF TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORV EY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY; City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of July 1, 1986 page Nineteen Council Member Alexander asked if the resolution could be changed to read 'would be a breach of faith" in the 8th paragraph. Consensus was to reword to "would be a breach of faith.' McAdams motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,$ Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chow "aye," and Mayor Stephens 'aye." Motion carried unanimously. E. The Council considered approval of a resolution appointing a member to the Texas Municipal Power Agency's Board of Directors. Council Member Alexander states that this was an important appointment as TMPA was a major entity in the state as well as a major budget concern for the City. Consideration had been given to appointing a member of the City Council to this board. Alexander motion to appoint Jim Riddlesperger. Chew motion to reappoint Roland Vela. Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he t4id not wish to accept this responsibility without the complete support of the City Council. This should be a united effort and he, therefore, wished to withdraw his name from consideration. The following resolution was presented: R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the term of office for Place 3 of the City of Denton, Texas on the Board of Director's of the Texas Municipal Power Agency will terminate June 30, 1986 ano WHEREAS, Roland Vela is heretofore appointed by the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas to Place 3 on the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency and shell serve as a Directors NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY. COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. Pursuant to the terms and provisions of Ordinance No. 75-22 of the City of Denton, Texas, Roland Vela is tereby appointed to the two year term of office to Place 3 on the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency. The term of office beginning July 1, 1986 and ending June 30, 1988. SECTTON II_ This Resolution shall become effective from and after its date of passage, and it is so ordered. PASSED AND APPROVED thiu the lot day of July, 1986. RA 3 E Ht. 3, A R CITY Oa DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i City of Denton city council minutes Meeting of July 1, 1966 Page Twenty APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY$ Riddlssl.arger motion, Alexander Second that the resolution be approved to reappoint Roland Vela to the TMPA Board of Directors bl acclamation. on roil call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye, Hopkins "aye,* Alford aye," Riddlesperger "eye," Chow *aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously, F, The Council considered approval of a resolution approving a letter to the Board of Trustees of Flow Regional Medical Center with respect to conflict of interest limitations for the new board, Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, reported that this resolution had been drafted at the instruction of the City Council. The following resolution was presented: R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton unanimously voted, on June 22, 1486, to send a letter to the Board of Trustees of the Flow Regional Medical Center expressing their concern about the conflict of interest limitations for the new Board and requesting that the new Board voluntarily adopt stricter standards= NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I That the City council hereby approves the letter attached h(reto and incorporated by reference herein and directs the City Secretary to deliver a copy of said letter to each member of the Board of Trustees of Flow Regional Medical Centers and that this letter shall be entered in the official records of the City of Dorton and attached to the Asset Transfer Agreement between the City of Denton, the County of Denton, the Flow Hospital Board of Directors and Flow Regional Medical center, SECTION II, That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 1st day of July, 1986. PAY STEP HENSt MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS )4PROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: McAdams motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, McAdams says,* Alexander "aye,' Hopkins •aye,• Alford •aye," Riddlesperger "aYv,' Chew "ay4," and Mayor Stephens *aye.* Motion carried unanimously. I city of Denton city council minutes Meeting of July 1, 1966 Page Twenty One 10. The Council considered confirmation of City Manager's appointment of Dr, Derrell StIlla to the Civil Service Commission. Alexander motion, McAdams second to confirm the appointment of Dr, Derrell Bulls to the civil Service Commission, Motion carried unanimously. 11. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that a meeting would be held on July 2 with county Commissioner Tanally regarding the Health Unit proposal. A report back would be made. 12, New Business No items of New Business were suygested by council members for future agendas. 13. The council convened into the Executive session to discuss legal matters, real estate, and personnel/board appointments. No official action was taken. With no further items of business, McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adjourn, Motion carried unanimously and the meeting was adjourned at 11:26 p.m. AXY E , MAYOR CHARLOM ALLEN] CITY SECRETARY 15498 -IINI DATE. 10/07/86 CITY COUNCIL REPoRT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council F11OM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBL?C HEARING FOR Z-1816 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Item at its meeting of August 27, 1986 and voted to recomme:d approval of Z-1816, by a vote of 5-1. SUMMARY: This is a request for a change In zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) district on a 4.5 acre tract located on the north side of FM 1173 and west of I-35. If approved, the planned development will permit light industrial land use on the property. BACKGROUND: This property was annexed In December of 1985 due to concern over existing and potential land uses In the area. This proposal violates the commercial strip policy of the Denton Development Guide as well as the four acre concentration policy In a low Intensity area, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: Tl i I.s no impact on the general fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Hr;:rell Prepared by: City Manager 011.1. .Qdr...,. Denise Spivey Urban Planner Appr ed: Jeff Meye Director of Planning and Development 03896/2 1 i PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL Tu: nenton City Council Case No.: Z-1816 Meeting Date: October 7, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Bill Foster 6409 I-35N Denton, Texas 76:,01 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action: A change in zoning from the agricultural (A) to planned development (PD) district, Approval of the detailed plan will permit the development of light industrial land uses on the property. Location and Size: A 4.558 acre tract located west of I-35 along FM 1173. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Agricultural, business, residential South - Agricultural, -iacant East - Agricultural, business, light industrial, commercial West - Agricultural, residential Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Property abuts a state road, FM 1173. Access points on FM 1173 are acceptable. Utilities: Nearest water service is existing 8" line at I-35N and Highway 77. Developer must request a water well permit for each lot. The 4evelopment must have adequate fire flow of 3,000 g.p.m. and if wells are used, a storage facility must be provided. c . (Cast., z-1816) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) If water storage facilities are not attached to structures, an amendment would be necessary. The 10" sanitary sewer line must be connected to a lift station to the north and across the frontage of the property, Drainage: Channel must have concrete bottom and oft-site permission will be required to move the channel discharge point, HISTORY The property was annexed by the City of Denton on December 51 1985. The reason for annexation was to control the development of this property and because of concern over existing and potential land uses on the 91,3 acres, INTENSITY The property is considered to be in a low intensity area, The property is adjacent to the nigh intensity area of Highway 77, Loop 288, and I-35, The boundary line currently follows the city limits line prior to the annexation described above. The land uses in this area include industrial, commercial, retail, and residential. The annexation added the following businesses to the City: Port-A-Stall, Foster"s Western Wear and Saddle Shop, Dozier Cabinet Works, W & W Auto Salvage, Border Cowboy Truck Stop, Howdy Loo0y Grocery, Cunninghams Photography Studio, Mini-Warehouses, and a building construction office. The businesses have frontage on the I-35 service road and Barthold Road, ANALYSIS The second item uf concern is the strip commercial (no residential) policy, The Development Guide states that a continuous strip is strongly discouraged in/or backing up to a low intensity area, This property, as well as the property to the south, is located in a low intensity area. Since this m (case. 2-1816) Page Three ANALYSIS (Continued) property does not abut the service road, the change in zoning would provide a strong indication that FM 1173 will also be stripped. The businesses fronting on I-35 are zoned commercial and light industrial. The other businesses are considered non-conforming uses. Many of the businesses and land uses listed above have a non-conforming status because the structures were in regular and continuous use at the time of annexation. The structures may be used for the same or similar user however, the structure may not be expanded or increased in size. In addition, if the use remains vacant for six months it is considered abandoned (Article 22 of the City of Denton zoning ordinance). The staff is concerned about the land planning for this area. The request does violate the four acre concentration policy in a low intensity area and does encourage a stripping of FM 1173 with four buildings for industrial use :located on the property. The Planning and Zoning commission elected to approve this request despite the above mentioned policy violations. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning commission considered this item at its'' meeting of August 27, 1986 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1816,,by a vote of 5-1. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Detailed Plan/Preliminary Plat 3. Development Standards 4. Reply Form Totals 5. Property Owner List 6. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of August 27, 1986 14969 I 1 • 1 I 1 r ~ GArlZER~RQ}~.._`"xrrx 1\ I 1 ,1 WI i! y' I r i 1 I 1 1 r /M 1816 _s~ -N- r t.Et.Ot a of Mool* W&JQVeY A 1A1 rlet► torts atrtrlrMM4tyMwlr All tWe a.gla trrt « 1 N lame uttrw 4 W 1.6,1. 6 0.t.►. Ca. E 11ia, 9...tf. +WIr«e InrWg l.C"'wttr 1 ar1K IAn Ytar« er«t r.. M +Ina to /yq« laagaty K' Trw ow"Ietme'tt ww t«t N a M 9tl N tW iwl Alnearlb N rha u rMar Lott, / ►nanr travel. taarl W ~µ(~Y ann«LIn6 M lnl4wt ~M atra kill 7tc~ ►r 0A1• M►lulM fme W onrtWaq wrlat a tar IfY.t Wt11 alntft lla Fitata a r I Icon lof tarty la sl.a., it rY a IIW,t tr ww." ewwr a th.'metals r1 er,.►.~t tart of L AOINCtLITUM !tt^" M Cfrk 401 x room '00 -77 N the Pow 11graa N kon mn bmee/, T•a« raatar b taltr MI, Iona Pt. atti ant•IM * with w RpY PHAAW PHA, VatN AGPIMULTURE IrMO" SWeN0 ae r WllttµiwW b w' N INt to w tru. Pon not to to t'r lit N _ /I,p,~, t«wt• r1eW-.t-r/ Ilr w ►ara.t►rtywa rtylrl w.w o "Into on U. Wit 1 p Tlwn Watt N Mptaa fr ala•tw 03 mart, WN _ wall aN 47 t.r -1 `~/i7. iA7!R Ad 11-_iA_ I' /r a ant tonter AMo N onu nynrt w ar/wraa on cy pMM a13.39 f Itr )to M It Flo" r N11 n«ti«•'4k'aW..t it., ro to r oA4t p* L~ T t ~ ~ u"mem'. 00 "bw tensJu,w taw tai I OMNI" tam theme, OW to, 'ho gar ro, w 'ho Jo •me+war ~1ret F!It. . 4G ` tW.r ►Ian a 6MW4 ►3 a1a11w 71 0.4114 rrt Mltn trl IIon► W /ar« t•a AG CIATIA" a, 1 .WG Y1,000 t a«+rn•a nr14 Uw Mid pact front ow eW A" it" a cW aaMla $ ;i •1 / Ot^.' ow AMA 611.39 t"t to the Not N &VIA IM trrrty 4.5so notion At jud. l rt4~~ tN r W/ ytt/Mto►t. Tar' *No Ims" tartlll to till r attr enr tr slat Wrong V a.ua Y r w aetrL nnrwr arita ta the pW 11 April Ism w non it LI a im. r ~'f too1 0, wA notation rwed6otat3M of tr pow F Am t«tpr, tw UIM •n, ~tt offift f "OVA DS M "SWO Yi «Mtwt M ow"ottt WA" as Yrt. M so IL at 'WSnWa i quantity N 1.11 ta«ana W nwa acettnrLl tnlrl•aw. ►Vt' ctrl tw Mand ~~..g ~ r 1nL r144 ton IINI rata t+ra MnMrr Ime to Auto"" M M rho wow, N'rwta•r rrMM ntar NflrrrYr W n W" 1 , lwrw«. At rlltlw wra " tW +1.tn 411111era, shot wcultato now, •r Hoar to A" Wray Mi w vlttwt r rMMI Matt) astir by tr tartar« ---'t"- - r w" tats form, ►6 OIMrtEMMNTA►L OA r►tAi>fEt 1YIY1M10 Yi0'0.4 s-1r11 *wmo lyy a 41rl4 MOMCUtTUtIE few" A 11t)fY►: I. rompow walac.Mr-Atlituanll 1 l~J , eaetwc r wtertttr l r' ital. nnr talon w r taaratrry u asaa«. ~ 1 • ~ 1 ' 1 t Al at11t►n w aeraar• is we t1q of pry. ' ♦ ~rD ar+apa ~ tt 1 {I MbY I IS n. rlnr pwwtw~Wa" room hrntalrn tr mom v .I6ppttt~ of prttrt metA~M0 « iA. /MAM Y1 N ti A4 W" Ar Name" meow" oomMt.. 1MAfE N H M UNION r tywrurlr la iod*XWt M rl (t l f l t1~l 1 coca a n 0N MAi► IrltOotrtrrtra In+n/ Irtyat oWSM 208100 AW"Oft wr f11NUhWYAAY PI AT 4 a aetotn ti a SAILED ■1" PLAN uEno tong w Omm Ow a _ `r► • PO A. 3r111 rye 7rpplt r►Ilotr MlYyMr twommmm" a r r Is► ' YN 3rwt IIA tlrptut nlrltln wrn.w rIr w•r ttlr Y- • 111100 LAM 01'r Es 'E' • utxle LIP* -a- - tsNpprlr ►W IM ' tltrlat! 1N - f Mc t~~wyµ`. BALM z • 07 August 1986 Job # 86-0186 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STATEMENT Bill Foster 1. Statement of _Intent A. To develop a four lot light industrial use development, as permitted by the zoning district. B. Development and marketing to coincide with established and future market demand. Construction to be accomplished by phasing. 2. Relation to Comorehansive Plan The proposed district is currently under study by the City of Denton. This development has been designed to meet the intent of the Development Guide. 3. Acreage Acreage - 4.558 acres i 4. Land Uses A. Existing.land use - agricultural, pasture - 4.558 acres B. Proposed land use: Light industrial -14.558 acres 5. Off-Site Infor tion As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 6. Traffic and Transportation As shown on the Detailed Site Plan A. Projected amount of traffic: 342 V.T.D. 7. Buildings A. Approximate location: As shown on the Detailed Site Plan B. Maximum height: 45-font, two-story C. Minimum building setbacks: 15 feet from property line 50 feet from right-of-way line minimum 20-foot separation between buildings n. Maximum total gross floor area: 62,400 square feet E. Number of dwelling units and units per acre: N.A. 8. Residential Subdiviaions N.A. 91 voter and Drainage As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 10, Utilities As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 11. Trees There are no tree masses located on the property with C 3 inches in diameter or greater. 12, Open Space • As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 13. Screening As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 146 Development 5c_hedule A. Phase I - Estimated start of construction: To Commence Upon Approval - 10/86 A. Phase I - Estimated end of construction - 12/86 C. Estimated phasing as shown on the Detailed Site Plan according to market demands Phase I 1986-1991 - Detailed Site Plan Submitted This Date Phar,e II 1991-1996 - Detailed Site Plan Submitted This Date Phase III 1996-2001 - Detailed Site Plan Submitted This Date Phase IV 2001-2006 - Detailed Site Plan Submitted This Date 15. Landscavin& Plan As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 16. Signs As permitted by ordinance 17. Sidewalks None required PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1616 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED James W. Owens Wesley Clark 2226 North Locust Route 1, Box 475C Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201 Baptist Foundation of Texas Loyd A. Wiley P.O. Box 1409 Dallas, TX '15221 o IJA ev~ 1/9 } mmi P 6 2 Minutes August 27, 1986 Page 2 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2_;,1816. Petition of Bilt Poster requesting a change in zoafng from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classification, approval of a detailed F Ian, and approval of the preliminary plat of the Bill ji Poster Addition on a 4.5 acre tract located on the north side of PM 1173 approximately 000 feet west of the 1-35 North service road. The propperty is more particularly described as a tract in the B, B.B. and C,R,R. Company Survey, Abstract 141. If approved, the planned devel- opment will permit the consrruction of a four lot light industrial development. Five notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received in favor, no reply forms were received in opposition, PETITIONER: Roger Barrett, Metroplex Engineering Corpora- tion representing Bill Foster, said that light industrial use is compatible with the surrounding land uses aad up- grading the area that presently exists. He said that the site is 1 000 feet north of the proposed Loop and approxi- mately 3.~ miles from Krum, He said that this area was designated as a low intensity area when annexed because the city limits were changed and the boundaries were not defined but that this area should be a high intensity area because of the surrounding land uses. He said his opinion is that the proposal meets the Development Guide and is an ideal place for the uses proposed, He said that it would be difficult to put single family on the lot because of the creek that runs through the middle of the property. He said that the lot will need a lot of fill to make it build- able and that they will be improving the drainage channel. He said that they will be extending sanitary sewer lines to the Border Cowboy Lift Station, He said that the pro- ject is in phases form east to west starting with Lot 1. He said that there will be common entries to limit curb cuts, very large setbacks and extensive landscaping. i Mr. Claiborne asked if there wou!,d be two drainage chan- nels. Mr. Barrett stated that they will have a 24 foot drainage and access easement. HA said that basically the parking lot will handle the open drainage and the service bay in the back will have a reverse curb which will dump into the major drainage channel to the north. IN FAVOR: Martin Poster, general manager of Fosters, sfa-fe47hat light industrial use on this property is good for the area, community and neighbors. He said that hous- ing would Le difficult for this property and this project is an asset to the community. H. L. Sanders, Krum, stated that he has no objections to the light industrial use and doesn't feel that anyone would want to build a house with a 6,500 trips per day on FM 1173, He said that light industrial is a good use and an asset to the community. Robert Sterdavent stated that this is a good place for truck repairs because of the traffic and the area. Jim Morris stated that light industrial is the highest and best use for the property. He said that this area is des- ignated in the plan guide for high intensity use for com- mercial and employment use. He said that this proposal is a viable plan and fits in with the Loop and I-35 land use and is supported by the traffic. He said that it is a plan of merit and he encourages support. NONE P i Z Minutes August 27, 1986 Page 3 • Gary Collins, Pitzner and Collins, stated that no develop- ment would want to put residential in this area. Mr. Claiborne asked why. Mr. Collins stated that the Denton Independent School Diorrict has the best school in the area and unfortunately Krum in comparison does not have a good school system. lie stated that one side of the road would be going to Denton and the other to Krum and it is a bad arrangement for developers. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT; Ms. Carson stated that the property was on- ne"iea by ffie City of Denton on December S, 1985 and the reason for annexation was to control the development of this property and because of concern over existing and potential. She said that the property is in a low Inten- sity area adjacent to the high intensity area at Highway 77, Loop 288, and I-35. The boundary line followed the city limits line prior to the annexation. The lend uses in this area include industrial, comercial, retail and residential. She said that the Commission may wish to table this item and consider establishing a specific boundary for this area. She sold that an item of concern Is the strip commercial policy. She said that since this property does not abut the service road, the change in zon- ing would provide a strong indication that PM 1173 will also be stripped. She said that the staff is concerned about the land planning for this area and the request does violate the four acre concentration policy in a low inten- sity area and does encouragge a stripping o4 FM 1173 with four buildings for industrial use located on the property. The staff also recommends that a minimum 201 of non-resi- dential areas be landscaped; however, this request does not indicate that amount and will have numerous concrete lined channels crossing the property, Since the area was annexed to prevent the continued development of strip com- mercial and non-residential uses in the area the staff concludes that the land use is unacceptable. She said that no water lines are located in the area and the devel- oper must request a water well permit for each lot that the development must have adequate fire flow of 3,000 gal- lons or minute and if wells are used, a storage facility must be provided. She said that if water storage facili- ties are not attached to structures, an amendment would be necessary, She said that there is a question in the area because there is no boundary line along the west side and staff recommends that the eas; sJdo of the property should be the boundary line for low inrensity, She said that staff recommends denlal of Z-1816, Mr, Claiborne asked how far away were the nearest city waterlines. Ms. Carson said over 1,000 feet, Mr. Claiborne asked if the waterline had sufficient capacity. Ms. Carson said yes. Mr, Claiborne asked If the other establishments In the area have a water well. Ms. Carson said yes but were placed in operation before the annexation or extension of the water line, Mr, Claiborne asked about the storage facility for the fire flow. Ms. Carson stated that it would have to be big enough to handle 3,UUO galloni per minute for 60 minutes for a light industrial use, Mr. Sundaramoorthy stated that the storage facility would have to handle 180,000 gallons of water. Mr. Claiborne asked if all four lots could use a common storage facility. Mr. Sundramoorthy stated that the Issue should be discussed with Bob Hagemann the Fire Marshal, WOMEN P 8 Z Minutes August 27, 1986 Page 4 Mr. Ellison asked Ms. Carson to briefly discuss the 201 itocreationgD apartmentts surveyed sstated that the urrounding cities r to de. teraine a precentage of land appropriated for non-resi- dential areas. She said a 201 landscaped figure was determined. asked • Ms. Brock is traffic a farm to market 1173. and is a main access to Krum. RSBUTTAL: Mr. Barrett, stated that the waterline has been a'ddress`ed by the Engineering Department. He said that they are asking for non-residential uses to create money to do infrastructure. He said that this use would create employ- ment, a tax base and add to the school system financially. He added that they are not starting strip activity because they have an excellent concept with four buildings that would upgrade and enhance the area. He said that the four acre concentration is slightly over but that it is not too much of a concern. Ile said that this area has potential for a high intensity node and this proposal is good land use for the area. Mr. Claiborne asked how light industrial was a transition. Mr, Barrett stated that light industrial is a lower traf- fic volume use. He said that there is landscaping In front. I Mr. Claiborne asked about the size of the well. Mr. Barrett stated that he didn't know but that they had talked with Mr. Hagemann and he stated that the fire flow requirement would need to be addressed at the platting stage. Ms. Carson stated that this is a detailed plan that re- quires a preliminary plat to be submitted and approved also. She added that if any changes are made on the plan, it will require an amendment. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Claiborne stated that he believed It would rake an 18-20 inch well to produce 3,000 gallons per min- ute for 60 minutes. He said that the petitioner makes a good point in that this area is not good for low density type dwellings. He said that the positive outweighs the negatives in this proposal, Mr. Kamman stated that he would not want a house next to a salvage yard, Mr. Glasscock stated that he felt there was no other use and is in favor because the land is better utilized with tb.1 s use, Ms. Cole stated that she was in agreement with no houses. Mr, Claiborne stated that land use Jntensity is a big issue. He said that the Land Use Planning Committee has not addressed this aroa but that Group 2 had talked about expanding the node to the west. Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval of Z-18160 seconded by Mr. Escue and motion carried (5-1), Ms, Brock voted no. ' 1589E NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 4.S ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF F.M. 1173, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF I-35 NORTH SERVICE ROAD, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZO:' 'ING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIV N AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the zoning classification and use designation of 4.5 acres of real property, described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use designa- tion to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordlnan:e of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. That there is approved for the district hereby established the "Detailed Plan", labeled as Exhibit 11811, attached hereto and incorporated by reference; so that hereafter the district shall be used and developed in accordance with the Detailed Plan herein approved. SECTION 111. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Coda of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69.1, as amended, is hereby amended to show such change In District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications. SECTION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change Is In accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION V. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements Z-1816/PAGE 1 thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000,00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of tts passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY STEPH NSj MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHAR OTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: a. cN~ i Z•1816/PAGE 2 EXHIBIT "A" All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the B.B.B. C.R.R. Co. Surrey, Abstract Number 141, Denton County, Toxmsl said tract being part of a tract shown by deed to Baptist Foundation of Texas and recorded in Volume 1017, page 911 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texasj and being more filly described as follower Beginning for the northeast corner of the tract being described herein at an iron pin found In piece, said corner being the southeast corner of that certain tract of land conveyed by dead to Wesley Clark and recorded in Volume 8941 page 375 of the Deed Accords of Denton County, Texas] Thence South 00 degrees 22 minutes 00 seconds West with and along the east line of the herein described tract 323.80 feet to an iron pin set in place on the northern right-of-way line of Fars-to-Market Highway Number 11731 of North said highway as5ervisconds dencedWon the herground and 5 feet feet to ran iron pin vat in place on said northern right-of-way line= Thence North 00 degrees 22 minutes 00 seconds East with the west line of the herein described tract 324.46 feet to a fence corner post for the northwest corner of this tracts Thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes 22 seconds Fast with and along the fenced and occupied mouth line of said Clark tract and the „orth line of the heroin described tract 612.59 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 4.558 acres of land. Z-1816 EXHIBIT NBN DETAILED PLAN FOR BILL FOSTER, CONSla'''ING OFt 1. Detailed Site Plan and Preliminary Plat (1 page)f and 2. Planned Development Design Statement and Development Schedule (3 pages). 41816 mn uYISE D R c. c n ry n Lw) cr) i i r1% 6 Bosoms a 00 none auptvmy A ~ 141 IILtf 6QttS Lteeef Ir L{Aly+y Lehr N All e►k terte4 efett k r IeeL NtekaL L 001111 . J C.1, A. ON 1 fwt4 tWt4er llR f1tMM Sertq. AblfMt 1Mraer 4l, a.,wp G.kr. rrl t wJr we °L • erkt enter M Jt{I e. telefst fetrwefee M tutr w rMMe+dAf 4 glttte IM), NMt fll N tMe Ak feteNe k 4e4. Mevf{N a ev!lewl Y. lummtl w ww eeee evil? tMtM.~Y ~ p,M. frol"leS L1W tM Mett{eeet WW of ne tewt Yely:=,.W ..roll. M M AOMCIILTIMa i»~ter.4i te4ewr?N i? e°°{Jwl M1y ar eekMeek erMtr k net rn,u I!I ~ At~'~ ~ )IS of the D.M Mw1° k Akr M{e PHASE p 11111-IML yye t{eek feetM ro eer«, 12 r..t a of meet tom 'ttM "A a"" 0. Nov l{k Af1RICULtIMt °eonMwiu r•iil -etiaent sett #A11 Lett 4 r Uwe I4 ut 4 Nit e r tM 4 .°y ls/ LM C M►tntetefw IILe1ty? foamier wil r.rr~ s Air/ ,w lI 'fir / nftk't ~'~t L~et~ l rN tf Lek '4ttA 1,0111 AM 1 01/ AO• AO 1,11116 AO I ,f•• 0t1* t.etlue .t pu 4ytart n M•stek r W ~°~r~y 6IM9 Lek to Aft QI SE 4_._y~ i-4.0040044111 _ it" OR in 4 ?ttu M ma. 6,tyMt rltytt.k.ee? lWl 1 ON ~'A r I AO tURe M u M"ime" t~ntee 3i 22 .414 14 t a e Lw taw et with Mt" eM J1r of w It. L L T 4 1 ..enter k eue trket terek LW tA• Merttek e y w l 4 JJL SqYL IMkt SeetA aL Ntrue krt« 27 terry Lett 'to eM " W AOIMCULYURK r t, MAO WOW j kaelet pmts ILM k a" C-..,* t'.4 .e1 tM ..rent ll°~ of w A TA l Bq.FI. 1 ~_~~,l,~~~.••-~µ-L( fJ~"' e6ee lW er.tt 411.N fek 4 tb Mitt k aMLnLN nt/ ta4lt {N at {.)31 tet°s r h• MJ v~ll{Y. M ekMMtw Aeee Aetey ektlf) to MII rekM tMw tY 14 sn M ktoll 00"" ft" k w At flue le teak fJ{e•1 06 4"1 loss earl t►k G fe e oftwom mad N1et+tt k tie e MMk r u /NMLJ//-- j..' _ i• . 'SrUM+IatW LAMWM " OW s to wa"Ut . toot e60 6ih lmowu enw M elw M r1I J te~_ a OMNM01, ~r' lrkltL of lent tWe4 Ar We amereettl t4aWM, plod, fAk Uy N ~'JY{J' MIA Plot tM W f1elJ M:ee tale pNtlrW tatilksto. far oleo et _ ht,f I teat.., w 4041tlN new Lt me M °l tl.e ferkM• ivuwt"er..went tLaWl .l tet. r4WHILM lY be tie ter"w M1414 Heft MteeM . ?etek K wit~M 14 April So A1INAINr111TAL 47/1 60"4^1030 (YMt// /aO.d. 3-W loot aert Mt %m ~M l f. ~ Ao3llsctu..tvRlt ,r .w~ :~is 4 1...... ~ A w NDY[J. i. Lgfe+M ffkr Lett-rkr"M f + 'I ` •,b ow" r "0111111.111111 ` f Y S. Awk MM MON NO DO Lrwtk.w r omftN4 '5 1 1 , • 73 PMQN3 RRrN1'T~ g10PCItp L. Ar re WV "ohm w w Gera ftM I 1 _ t fhlAtt . IL N A, rretlr freer WIN ►Me P010114110 0101601111 {r 1 t !1 ( IL~i _ L-~ fMAtt L )f wah & Mold". terwr r kIt w et~rMle{ VV ewe L)tt'tl ft" • 1 11 Mlt{err is q uOtWt4t am M LMOMt F'11Att MI ff Me AM lea do mowww WOW mww is m r WOW wwniyM► Mt N 14 20 ItviPW4 •t{eeMer• w I~1(I ~'`~t?}~ TOTK Lt » foetal ~1 !t\\l ~ ~ 1.11 TION MAP efarewak1f11a {nrnf LtIMp{tfMMl. ftrlMiL t011r14/N - r v "'MO~OrD , M su Poop 1tgY PLJ1T 11 Q,wtl~llta o~o/wortoRt fem. . t . - -r=te O NTA~t~ NITS PLAN ulftoo ~ --~+•~•t Stu t.l~.* o. w e N RIP - tot IrIre" 1rpL1" r : W isnaAt, ►rflL+r 111101110101 r~7t 10 Cdl/p1Aiftl11 sit aAtr{w 4Matfl `rt••t ..tet..w eutr teat Geer L' ffMf LSMI 1~~~ILA 1~a w -t'. - tslffllwf LlfW IN - tIM{+M{le Line ~ 77Ub7AATLfl~Tlf~i i7r7 .yA~,.- A fF hr{e hit r~{• f{I • r1f° IlPol y. eee-w.tt fRA.r 1•+IM' }-r -f1 ffffle 07 August 1986 Job N 86-0186 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STA_ Bill Foster 1. Statement of Intent A. To develop a four lot light industrial use development, as permitted by the zoning district. B. Development and marketing to coincide with established and future market demand. Construction to be accomplished by phasing. 2. RelAtI q_to gggyrehogsivo Plan The proposed district is currently under study by the City of Denton. This development has been designed to meet the intent of the Development Guide. 3. Acr**Ae Acreage - 4.558 acres 4. h2nd Uses A. Existing,land use - agricultural, pasture - 4.558 acres B. Proposed land use: Light industrial -14.558 acres 5. Off-Site Information As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 60 Traffic and Transnortatioa As shown on the Detailed Site Plan A. Projected amount of traffic: 342 V.T.D. 7. Buildings A. Approximate location: As shown on the Detailed Site Plan B. Maximum height: 45-foot, two-story C. Minimum building setbacks: 15 feet from property line 50 feet from right-of-way line minimum 20-foot separation between buildings D. Maximum total gross floor area: 62,400 square feet E. Number of dwelling units and unite per acrer N.A. B. Residential Subdivisions N.A. 9. Water and Drainaae As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 10. Utilities As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 11. Tr es There are no tree masses located on the property with Oaks 3 inches in diameter or greater. 12. Open Space As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 13. Screening As shown on the Detailed Site Plan 14. DeveloM2nt Schedule A. Phase I - Estimated start of constructions To Commence Upon B. Phase I - Estimated end of construction - 12/8(,rovai - 10/86 C. Estimated phasing as shown on the Detailed Site Plan according to market demands Phase I 1986-1991 - Detailed Site Plan Submitted This Date Phase II 1991-1996 - Detailed Site Plan Submitted This Date Phase III 1996-2001 - Detailed Site Plan Submitted This Date Phase IV 2001-2006 - Detailed Site Plan Submitted This Date 15. Landscaping Plan As shown on the Detailed Site flan 16. Signs As permitted by ordinance 17. Sidewalks - None required FLAMING AND ZONING COMNtSSION RECOM MUDAT I ON TO CITY COUNC I L To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1822 Meeting Date: October 7, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker 3141 Hood, Suite 330 Dallas, Texas 75219 Status of Applicant: Owners Requested Action: A change in zoning from agricultural to single family-10 (SF-10). Location and Size: The property is located west of Teasley Lane and south of Hickory Creek Road. The site is 29.356 acres in size. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Planned development (Z-1766) for single family, duplex, condominium, multi-family, recreation area, and general retail South - Extraterritorial jurisdiction; agricultural East - Single family-7 ($F-7); single family (Old Alton Estates) west - Extraterritorial jurisdiction; agricultural Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area (Casa Z-1822) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: The property has access to Hickory Creek Road; a primary maJor arterial. Hickory Creek Road is designated as a part of the Loop 288 system. The City of Denton has not received official approval by the highway department for Hickory Creek Road to be the location of the Loop. Right-of-way for the Loop will be 200 feet or more, but the City can require only 120 feet of right-of-way (601 from center line). Limited access will be permitted on Hickory Creek Road, a primary major arterial. Traffic signals will be spaced 1/3 mile apart. Sidewalks required on Hickory Creek Road and on internal streets. Utilities; The City of Denton plans to serve this area with electricity. The tract will require extensive water and sewer line improvements. The existing water line is north of this site at Lake Forrest Village on Ryan Road. The sewer line is located south at the Hickory Creek lift station. Drainage: Fletcher Branch is to remain completely natural with the entire floodway dedicated to the City. All ainor drainage channels should be concrete. The developer will be responsible for half of the culvert under Hickory Creek Road. HISTORY The property was annexed by the City of Denton on April 6o 1966. The property north of this proposal was zoned planned development in April of 1986. The City of Denton also approved a planned development at the northwest corner of Hickory Creek Road and Teasley Lane and single family-7 on the southwest corner of that intersection. A planned development abutting this tract on the north side of Hickory Creek Road was also approved this year. The Denton Independent School District is constructing an elementary school on Hickory Creek Road. (Case Z-1822) Page Three ANALYSIS The property is located in a low intensity area according to the Denton Development Guide. The adjacent property to the east is outside the city limits. Old Alton Estates, a small estate size lot subdivision, is located east of this request. The Development Guide states that the primary purpose of low intensity areas is to insure the overall land use balance is maintained by controlling the density and intensity in the area. These areas are the primary housing areas for the city of Denton and should emphasize residential use rather than commercial or employment uses. RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1822. by a vote of 6-0. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Change Exhibit 3. Site Plan Z-1766 4. Reply Form Totals 6. Nailing List 6. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July 23, 1986 0288s/1 ell 4ir ?D-tor Sr-g) -'I .04 ■ ~A-9~ ~D +?otldsn..r x~. ~ Z- 1"4 Z"1466 L , Ml t'u!1 tiAtr , >A~ ~y\ 1 •1tJ'J7'} .err. n Z- IW6 ' a 'I y -1 ,/0 most If l I ~ . ~w ~r r►~ra...~ww~~~~~.~wlr r.~~i~~~} ~ r.~~~•.ri.~ J I (fIMI II ~t [ 11 I A.. (rNwl.. (lyJ L u,. 4 Va wY YNM MN1b III, 1~1 1~ ?b ~ \ / \ ......r. M D N D. f....... - / rl v I~}'►, 114 i / d. 14N MIMVIM. ~ • V LC M~4/1 ed. r04 b 11. Sr- ►D AGREr> " 29 35E seuoom W. 6AHWU ' 1 n J r. M++NY ~ ra Nne.+ V 10" to oK R4YbUP J TU40f, 7141 up lute •3N ' Delos fWl/ MtN Z -1822 DATF1 SANDERS H.CAMPBELL a HAYWRN TUCKER <'x BURKE ENGINEERING WET ZONING CHANGE EXHIBIT + I SIT OF 29-356 acRSs S. LOCUST, SUITE (05 ocrrTa+, Ttixai 76201 um eas• 3711 '~s"n,5: r1Y'1,}•: lt~,ftl~~fi~~ :F♦ Ir ~•n.ww•.n Wq r rturr■r■!~ ■ r ~l!>.l"r■~~ i ~■rJJqql'+~rAr'■~lya■■ n+iIFE trllnu'nruirlruoaruruurNMltu1 - .~,r v 1.•.IS~'~~r!~ `7'jl M e `:'1 P;1'r~ r :/Jt.L/ y.'~ , L .l,r. ?dl t11 is tF (l ~,J ..1.~' .r r ` ~ 1 •1.V , 1' ~,.►1 i. r 5f l s'~ 1 rw'i1 L 1 St4 !r1-i ~ T r Ji:,!~ ( If+. ~~~~L~'t :~r•4I.Ny. ) err 1~ .,ly~r' w~1` X11 al r~yrs )y~ ''i..' '.i 1'};3 t4'~~ itbNli! 1 ~ I~~~ ,.r ~ iJ.l i 1 l ~yy ~`f'`r` 1 f i 'r 'Z , l4 yIt11V y'1. ',n ` ' 1 , r .iI•rF~L"Y~M~I f ii, I 111 ' 1 : f Y N/r M,'i~.~ fl 1`l TL ~I ♦ ~1 ~ 1 4l~ ~j I ~•~1~ r j I .'""~1Y4,1A~ VV 117r1`~ rr,.'r { H.ZiI 1•Y~ .r{i V7f 'l,t 1'}~~tt .l~f^~~'F' i4ll It C $ r ''f~ 1~•~'. ♦ ~ • ~r•1/ + r, L.. n. I ~~•'nr + +~~IS:% ~ 1 + ••S• j• ~1 . • f N •Fl,nti 1~f1' ~ 1* 1! ! r^ ~ w r ti L ~ yy Il pr •L ) , r •l' ~ItA. J ~I. 1 Y. 1•'.• I v l.y 1•'' q•XS 9.Y ~I ~ii JI ,~1~1},~Sr "I fr 1 Y ~ ,i. .r ~1' V 1 9~,. 1 1 1 •1 , " ' rt r, y~~Y ,S Sk , r Ott 11 tt a ,A 1 r\.,•pr Imo, ! 1 r T, 1 xl • / 1 r f, 1 ttiFJll ' ,1'• r fW P'. ■ f, 1,,.1.1 _ .I if - [y■•l6KiAL 4L'7AIL.. 1, tE.. ti.. :VJAYA. f ' ~*A~11b1~ 01 .~,ry~y 1 • r r • 1'1aM. Y/,4~, 1 1 It 9"' h I • ""I~. rd•1 ,l \G Ile ~ ) ..L ~~♦~c .,.~~lis. ' 1MItiIr i ~ ma~yy..--~«-• r. j ...___....~....wururrr Mrra......Irf■O■■■rMMrNrY■Nf,fMr■Nrfr■N■Mr■!■NO■■ PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1822 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received A6L-itD 3 3 0 7j'z OWN a ~AA d, 7 7 r P i Z Minutes July 23, 1986 Page S Ms. Brock stated that Z-1820 violated the intensity stan- dard, the density was decreased with the addition of a park, the proposal would add' traffic problems, and would have an impact on the Robert U. Lee School, She move to recommend denial of Z-1810. Seconded by Mr. Escue and motion carried (4-2), Ms. Cole and Mr. Glasscock voted no. B. Z-1811. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, r'F'uusstee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-l0 (SF-IU) on 29,356 acres. The (Teasley Lane) proper and i south a of d Hi2PSOO ckory feet creek west Road of anFM 2181 d shown In the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and 8, M. Rogers Survey 1101. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the SP-10 district. Five notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received in favor, no reply forms were received in opposition, PETITIONER: Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, stated that he'WTiasTeen working with the owners and Worrell Associates to develop a comprehensive land plan on the entire 200 acres. He said that the property was recently annexed and they felt It was time for a plan. He said that they are requesting SF-10 blanket zoning. He said that they intend Internal street distribution for all access to this seg- ment of land. He said that It will be a long time before platting and building so that Is the reason they opted for blanket zoning on all the tracts instead of a planned de- velopment. He said that they are physically Limited In • t what hat they recan do quest istwell ewithinatheSlowOinareas. tensity ystandard. He said to the southwest and northeast there is an electri- cal easement and the property to the southwest is the Corps of Engineers floodway. He added that there is an existing development to the east with no access through this land. Ms. Brock stated that this request with the others is a natural for a planned development. She said that if the Commission approves this r,~quest and denies the others, would there be an access problem, Mr. Burke said yes. He said that the request along with the other requests is a natural planned development but that it is a lot more ex- pensive when they don't know when they are going to devel- op. He said that they started with a planned development that had duplex and four-plex. He said that they dropped the duplex, four-plex and planned development and lowered intensity. Ms. Brock stated that the Commission and staff are con- cerned with the extension of the Loop and Hickory Creek Road in regards to satbacks, traffic movements, etc, Mr. Burke stated that they can comply when platting occurs with a 60 foot right-of-wsy on northern property line and an additional SO foot building line, Ms, Brock asked if there is any work being done to the west of this property. Mr. Burke stated that dirt work is being done on the school site. IN FAVOR: J. B. Jenkinson, resident of Old Alton Estates, state that he appreciates the SP-10 area and is in favor of zoning but that he is concerned about traffic from this request on Old Alton Drive. He said that he would like a condition to be incorporated to say that no access will be allowed from this request on Old Alton Drive and that the developer should use Hickory Creek Road for his proposal. P >F 2 minutes July 23, 1986 Page 6 • Mr. Ellison stated that the Commission cannot impose con- ditions on straight zoning requests but the access can be addressed at rho platting or subdividing stage, He said that he felt that there are no plans for access to Old Alton Drive. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the property was annexe y the City of Denton on April 8, 1986. She said that the City of Denton approved a planned development at the northwest corner of Hickory Creek Road and Teasley Lane and single family-7 on the southwest corner of that intersection. A planned development abutting this tract on the north side of Hickory Creek Road was also approved this year. She said that the Denton Inde endent School District constructing an lementar rr Creek Road. She said that s he recommended l that H all ot cases (2.1822 - Z-1826) be submitted as a planned develop- ment but the petitioner decided to submit straight zoning r located in equests on all the tracts. She said that the property is a low intensity Development Guide. Theadiscent property to the eastois outside the city limits. Re said that old Alton Estates, a small estate size lot subdivision is located east of this request. The Development Guide states that the pri- mary purpose of low intensity areas is to insure that the overall land use balance is maintained by controlling the density and intensity in the area. Theso areas are the primary housing areas for the City of Denton and should . emphasize residential use rather than commercial or employ- ment uses. She said that staff recommends approval of t-1822. Mr. Ellison asked if the Engineering Department agreed with the comments on the road. Mr. Clark said yes. Ms, Brock asked if the city had control over street access and alignments. Mr. Clark stated that the roads must meet the City of Denton standards and the City could deny the plat if they do not. REBUTTAL: Mr. Burke stated that in regard to the access to 01371ton Drive they are open for suggestions. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Ms. Cole moved to recommend approval of i-102Z.- Seconded by Mr. Holt and unanimously carried (__..(o -,0) . C. 2.1823. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, rTuitee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural p(A) to single family-10 (SP-10) on 13.410 acres. The Le) r and i south located of Hi4,500 ckory feet an anFM 2181 d shown (Teasley Creek e Road of ay the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and B. M. Rogers Survey 1101. If approved, the propperty may be utilized for any purpose permitted in the SP-10 district, Three notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received in favor; no reply form was received in opposition; one reply form was received undecided. PBTITIONEk: Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, stated that RR s the school tract and the school is presently pre- paring building plans. He said that they are preparing lan and Ha saidothatethetschool iswscheduledito opensine19g. No , n 1#3it, NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AS SAME RAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF • ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 20,356 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE J. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 108E AND THE B. M. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1101, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFI- CATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO SINGLE FAMILY "SP-10" CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $1,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING POP, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable to all or part of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use to Single Family "SF-10" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of tho City of Denton, Texas, S°,CT10N II. That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1 1s hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. SECTION III. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION IV. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the re4uirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate Issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION V. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any 2-1822/PAGE 1 1 , person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the data of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHULOTTE s CITY 9ECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: Z-1822/PAGE 2 77 -7 .77 EXHIHIT "A" FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the Jr Rotors SurveY Abstract Number 1085 and the B.,Mo Rogers Survey 1101, Donton County, Texas and being a Abstract Number part Of the 4 tracts described In the Deed conveying 50% interest from Rayburn Tucker# Trustee to SaDnend-- ern CAmpbatl recorded in Vnluma ton 673 rate 277 of the Deed Renords as Enllo" Ilowse of , Tnxas, the aubJect trant being more particularly described BEGINNING for the most Southerly Corner of the trant being described here- in, at an iron rod at the moat Southerly Corner of the raid Tucker-Camp-"ne the andlateocboingtin thetNorth line of$TrAcAid CartaaLittlexElmeReser- voir; THENCE North 50 Degrees 31 Minutes 04 Seonnda West with the South line of the said Tucker-Campbell Tract and the North line of Tract p.556 a dist- anoe of 731.,91 feat to a concrete monument at an angle ttointl THENCE North 37 Degrees 26 Minutes OS Seconds West continuing with said line a distance of 884.58 feet to an iron rod at the Northwest Corner of the heroin described traot, laid rod being in the Northerly line of a 75 foot Texan Municipal Power Agenoy assementl THENCE North 49 Dagreas 34 Minutes 36 Seconds East with the lne of the sAid easemont a distance of 1506,56 feet to an iron rod forttheiNorth- eant Corner of the herein described tract in the East line of the said S,M.• Ror.ers Surveys THENCE South 01 Degree 43 Minutes 00 Seconds West with the East li^e of thn said B,M,. Rogers Survey and the East line of the said Tucker-Campbell Tract a distance of 355.75 feet to a concrete monument at the Southeast Corner of the Aald 8.I-f. Rogers Survey and the Northeast Corner of the said J. Rogers Survey Abmtrant Number 10850 THENCE South 00 Dearnes 49 Minvtae 33 Seconds West continuing with the East line of the said Tucker-Campbell Tract and the East line of the said J,. Ro- ars Survey Abstract Number 1085 a distance of 1786.06 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 29.356 acres of land. Z-1822 Imp) >.~_.c.,.~ :;f !F'+ .:~r 5€,, ..'a s^ `i DATE: 10/07/06 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Councils 1,... i FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDINANCE - 2-1823 RECOMMENDA^.1ON: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,.,, by a vote of 6-0. SUMMARY: A request for a change in zoning from agricultural (Al to single family-10 (SF-10) on 13.41 acres. The property is the site of construction of a now school. BACKGROUND: The property is located in a low intensity area. A public school is a permitted use in a single family-10 district. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Three (3) property owners within two hundred feet were notified. All departments involved in the development process will be affected. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact can be determined at this timed Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Harrell Prepared by: City Manager L Cecile Carson Urban Planner Appro Jeff Meye Director of Planning and Development 0262o I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1823 Meeting Date: October 7, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Sanders Campbell and Ra}aurn Tucker 3141 Hood, Suite 330 Dallas, Texas 75219 Status of Applicant: Owners Requested Action: A change in zoning from agricultural to single family-10 (SF-10). Location and Size: The property is located west of Teasley Lane and south of Hickory Creek Road. The site is 13.41 acres in size. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Planned development (Z-1766) for single family, duplex, condominium, multi-family, recreation area, and general retail South - Extraterritorial jurisdiction= agricultural East - Single family-7 (SF-7); single family (Old Alton Estates) West - Extraterritorial jurisdictions agricultural Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area I (Case Z-1823) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: The property has access to Hickory Creek Road) a primary major arterial. Hickory Creek Road is designated as a part of the Loop 288 system. The City of Denton has not received official approval by the highway department for Hickory Creek Road to be the location of the Loop. Right-of-way for the hoop will be 200 feet or more, but the City can require only 12U feet of right-of-way (60' from center line). Limited access will be permitted on Hickory Creek Road, a primary major arterial. Traffic signals will be spaced 1/3 mile apart. Sidewalks required on Hickory Creek Road and on internal streets. Utilities: The City of Denton plans to serve thin area with electricity. The tract will require extensive water and sewer line i.nprovements. The existing water line is north of this site at Lake Forrest Village on Ryan Road. The sewer line is located south at the Hickory Creek lift station. Drainage: Fletcher Branch is to remain completely natural with the entire floodway dedicated to the City. All minor drainage channels should be concrete. The developer will be responsible for half of the culvert under Hickory Creek Rced. HISTORY The property was annexed by the City of Denton on April 8, 1966. The property north of this proposal was zoned planned development in April of 1986. The City of Denton also approved a planned development at the northwest corner of Hickory Creek Road and Teasley Lane and single family-7 on the southwest corner of that intersection. A planned development abutting this tract on the north side of Hickory Creek Road was also approved this year. (Case 2-1623) Page Three ANALYSIS The property is located in a low intensity area according to the Development Guide. These areas were designated as low intensity to insure the overall land use balance in the City of Denton. The balance in the low intensity areas is controlled by density and intensity of land use in the area. This site i::, the proposed location of a new elementary school on Hickory Creek Road to be completed by September of 1987. RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1823; by a vote of 6-0. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Exhibit 3. Rep1 Form Total 9. Mailing List 5. Minutes or Planning and Zoning Commission of July 23, 1986. 0288e/2 t , N ?-boom* 10 Ile 4111 L.4"f, -,,A#. IL It .974R Moab 22 Cl~ It 4e Lm Ot df. 1~ *==No inmw~~ 1 i NIr~ cr/wc rro ~~YY YY Mir, r 1 1 N " 11.41 !/p~I ITV. MID M. bstM. 111 YI 'C, V1UUiT1 N~ "TIM, i q71 l ~ `17 scuoo~ , ' W1p.IM ' W rJc AaZKO 13.410 1 M ' IMWMI S&WPPyy~~* W. cAMPM 1 a _ RAYC5t1P1.1 TWYJ!g ~ W W ]M ~1 Irmo 71M IC ~3'1d 1 p4l/6, tfW16 Y1411 . ? DATE SANDERS H.CAMSELL 8 RAYBURN TUCKER M UC BURKE ENGINEERING SHEET ZONING CHANGE EXHIBIT OF 417 LOCUST, SY1T[ 106 j 13.410 ACRES f OENTON, TEXAS 74201 1/17! 6M b7N °T ,%21: • 1 r`4 -,.,,-«-.,1.....-•. _ ....ry+ar 'n°' -r sF')e+..rk.;a...-•'4 ~fb`5~ n7A ~ 1 "z~~++, , s 1 $ 1-' ~ a~' na ~ ~a ~ I . , r ~ -~i"ai4,yFYY t t ~ 77 7 7' PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1823 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Nane Received None Received I 2 ~ ISo13 #4d , ~7V jc.- /GI 5! ' 8 9f~o~d Ql'o P i Z Minutes July 23, I986 Page 6 .fir. Ellison stated that the Commission cannot impose con- ditions on straight zoning requests but the access can be addressed at rho platting or subdividing stage. He said that he felt that there are no plans for access to Old Alton Drive. • OPPOSED: None present. 7 FF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the property was Annexot y the City of Denton on April 8, 1986. She said that the City of Denton approved a planned development at the northwest corner of Hickory Creek Road and Teasley Lane and single fs1$llr-7 on the southwest corner of that intersection. A planned development abutting this trace on the north side of Hickory Creek Road was also approved this year. She said that the Denton Independent School District is constructin an elementary school on Hickory Creek Road. She said that staff recommended that all the cases (Z-1812 - Z-1826) be submitted as a planned develop- ment but the petitioner decided to submit straight zoning requests on all the tracts. She said that the property Is located in a low intensity area according to the Denton outsidemthe cityolimits.adSheosaidrthattOldoAlthe tonoEstates, a small estate size lot subdivision is located east of this request. The Development Guide states that the pri- mary purpose of low intensity areas is to insure that the overall land use balance Is maintained by controlling the density and intensity In the area. These areas are the primary housing areas for the City of Denton and should emphasize residential use rather than commercial or employ- ment uses. She said tnat staff recomaends approva~ of Z-1812. Mr. Ellison asked if the Engineering Department agreed with the comments on tha road. Mr. Clark said yes. Ms. Brock asked if the city had control over street access and alignments. Mr. Clark stated that the roads must meet the City of Denton standards and the City could deny the plat if they do not. REBUTTAL: Mr. Burke stated that in regard to the access to Iron Drive they are open for suggestions. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Ms. Cole moved to recommend approval of Seconded by Mr. Holt and unanimously carried C. Z-1823. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, rus e, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural SiUIO f&@IIY-10 2181 acres. (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown In the J. Rogers Survey 1085 and B. M. Rogers Survey 1101. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in thhe SF-10 district. Three notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; one reply form was received in favor; no reply fora was received in opposition; one reply form was received undecided. PIi TIONfxt Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, stated that fAll school tract and the school is presently pre- paring building plans. He said that they are prepertnl plans for the water and sewer extension and street paving. e amid that the school is scheduled to open in 19870 He P 4 Z Minutes July 13, 1986 Page 7 said that there is specific performance requirements for both parties involved. He said that on the plat there is dedicated right-of-way and building setback. He said that a 41 foot back to back north/south collector street along east property line will be constructed. He said that this request is consistent with plans for the area. IN FAVOR; None present. OPF_ OS6: None present. STA F R PORT: Ms. Carson stated that the property is in e procs s of being platted, She said that this is the roposed location of a school to be opened in September of 94 7. She said that extensive utility improvements must be completed. She said that a school is allowed in all districts except a parking district. She said that the portion of land on the west side is for a ppark site. She added that staff recommends approval of Z-1813. 88UTTALt Mr. Burke stated that he is available for ques ons. Chair declared public hearing closed. M UBCtS-1- Ms. Cots moved to recommend approval of Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and unanimously carried L(6.0). 1s. Z-1824. Petition of Sanders Campbell ■nd Rayburn Tucker, TrTr-ui ea, requesting a change in zoninrr from agricultural (A) to single family-7 (SF-7) on 1S6.044 acres. The property is located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the B. M. Rogers Survey 1101, J. Rogers Survey 1084, and J. Rotors Survey LOSS, 1E approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose allowed in the SP-7 district. Bight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; two reply forms were received in fav%r; no reply forms were received in opposition. P ETITIONER: Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, stated that ' Fr t ss `req st is 156 acres of proposed SF-7. He said that physical constraints take up a great deal of the western edge of the property. He said that in regard to the in- tensity, this tract will be close to four units per acre. He said that they are interested In satisfying as to the I line, He said ntent with the 60 foot right-of-way and 50 foot building school plat. hehsaid hthaththere eare arlot doftvarlableshon andthisbetrcommiact asy,ith ahplannedcdavelopment. FAVOR: None present. UPP_a OOSgp: Linda Howes, Old Alton Bstates, stated that her concern was that 156 acres could yield a lot of SF-7 units. She said that Hickory Creek Road is a very small road and time. traffic of this areaibe SF11Qhbe- cause the lots next to this property have been approved Ear SF-7 use. STAFF ABP Ts Ms. Carson stated that it this tract of 156 Acres a roved along with the already approved 60 acres of SF-7 in area there will be 216 acres of SF -7 zoning In tent.treShe soldsthattstaffihads$ussated additleaalaIF-10 as Ms. Howes but so additional SF-10s F-e10 was provided. She 11, 7' 7' rY I339L 0 NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-19 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 13.410 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE J. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1084 AND THE B. M. ROGERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1101, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFI- CATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO SINGLE FAMILY "SF-10" CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTYi PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF 51000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN*ON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable to all or part of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use to Single Family "SF-10" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION Ii. That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1 is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. SECTION 111. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION IV. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each sucli person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion !hereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION V. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application ti:ereof to any Z-1823/PAGE l person or circumstancb is held invalid byy any court of competent juri diction, such holdin shall not af[ect the validity of the remaining portions of th s ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such Invalidity. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shell become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage and the City Secretary Is hereby directed to cause the capt[on of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY STEPHEN50 MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHAROTTE ALLEN, CITY SECMffM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: Z-1823/PAGE 2 111101 EXHIBIT "A" FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the J. nears Sarver Abstract Number 1064 and the 8,M, soarers Survey Abstract mWbor 1101, Denton County' Texas and being a part of the 4 tracts described in the Deed • 302 intsest from Irybutn Tudwo TrAtse to 4 wl t- Csepbell twndsd is tJUN 673 pop the Doed Records of Denton County# Texas, as reeofMised and oc ]TI of aroundi the subject tract being more particularly described as follows the B EOINNTNo for the Northwest Corner of the tract being described hereinp at an iron r&$t-rWodtset in County t road North X11 Tact in the sdddle of an knowno as Hf the ickorysaid Creek Road ) and in ng South 69 Drecognised North line of the said J.• Rogers Survey$ acid red bei Minutes 31 Seconds East a distance of 300,,00 feet from an iron rod found at Northwest Corner of t the he said Tueke r-Campbell Traetj THENCE South 69 Degrset OD Minutes 31 Seconds East with the North line of the said rAkft`Csspbsll Tract with the sdddla of the said road passing the East line of the sold J, Rogers Survey with the West line of the said L.lt, noxers survey a distance of 79040 feet to an iron rod set for the Northeast Corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 01 Deares 43 Minutes 00 Seconds West leaving said road at 34.83 feet nasaina an iron rod set in the occupied South Una of the said read in a fence and continuina along said course, in a11a a total distance of ?".I0 rest to an iron rod set for the Southeast Corner of the heroin described traotl THENCE North 99 Dogreas OS Minutes 31 Seconds West with a line 73e,00 feet South of and parallel with the North line of the said 790.00 feet to an iron rod set for the Southwest Cornlth~hroin dance of traotJ described THENCZ North 01 Degree 43 Minutes 00 Seconds Zest with a line 300600 fact Wt arall cassinnpam iron rod with n+~s"es pbsll Mi•t at M.9c feet set e in e a t feline of the said nce in the occupied South line of the said road and continuing along said course, in all, r, total distance of 739,30 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and anclosin6 13.410 so:as of land. Z-1823 DATE: 10/07/86 COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDINANCE - 2-1824 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approvw: by a vote of SwJ'• U~ MMARY: A request for a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-7 (SP-7) on 156.044 acres. The property is located west of Teasley Lane and south of Hickory Creek Road. BACKGROUND: The property is located in a low intensity area. These areas are the primary housing areas for the City of Denton and toe proposal is consistent with Development Guide policies. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS APNECTED: Eight (8) property owners within two hundred feet were notified. All departments involved in the development process will be affected. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact can be determined at this time. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Harrell Pre ared by: City Manager Cecile Carson Urban Planner Appr ed: 6 "61F^ Jeff Me er Director of Planning and Development C263o PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1824 Meeting Date: October 7, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker 3141 Hood, Suite 330 Dallas, Texas 75219 Status of Applicant: Owners Requested Action: A change in zoning from agricultural to single family--7 (SF-7), Location and Size: The property is locatel west of Teasley Lane and south of Hickory Creek Road, The site is 156.044 acres in size, Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Planned development (2-1766) for single family, duplex, condominium, multi-family, recreation area, and general retail South - Extraterritorial jurisdiction; agricultural East - Single family-7 (SF-7); single family (Old Alton Estates) West - Extraterritorial jurisdiction; agricultural Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area ~r (Case Z-1824) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: The property has access to Hickory Creek Roadt a primary major arterial. Hickory Creek Road is designated as a part of the Loop 288 system. The City of Denton has not received official approval by the highway department for Hickory Creek Road to be the location of the Loop. Right-of-way for the Loop will be 200 feet or more, but the City can require only 120 feet of right-of-way (60' from center line). Limited access will be permitted on Hickory Creek Road, a primary major arterial. Traffic signals will be spaced 1/3 mile apart. Sidewalks required on Hickory Creek Road and on internal streets. Utilities: The City of Denton plans to serve this area with electricity. The tract will require extensive water and sewer line improvements. The existing water line is north of this site at Lake Forrest Village on Ryan Road. The sewer line is located south at the Hickory Creek lift station. Drainage: Fletcher Branch is to remain completely natural with the entire floodway dedicated to the City. All minor drainage channels should be crnicrete. The developer will be responsible for half of the culvert under Hickory Creek Road. HISTORY The property was annexed by the City of Denton on April 8# 1986. The property north of this proposal was zoned panned development in A ril of 1986. The City of Denton also approved a planned development at the northwest corner of Hickory Creek Road and Teasley Lane and single family-7 on the southwest corner of that intersection. A planned development abutting this tract on the north side of Hickory Creek Road was also approved this year. The Denton Independent School District is constructing an elementary school on Hickory Creek Road. (Case Z-1824) Page Three ANALYSIS The property is located in a low intensity area according to the Denton Development Guide. The adjacent property to the east is outside the city limits. Old Alton Estates, a small estate size lot subdivision, is located east of this request. The Development Guide states that the primary purpose of low intensity areas is to insure the overall land use balance is maintained by controlling the density and intensity in the area. These areas are the primary housing areas for the City of Denton and should emphasize residential use rather than commercial or employment uses. Diversified residential uses are encouraged in low intensity areas. The staff had suggested the sinqle family-10 area at the southeast area be increased into this area. The petitioners stated that the utility easement is a logical boundary for the separation of single family-7 and single family-10. RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1824 by a vote of .-5" lL ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMEN'T'S 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Exhibit 3. Reply Form Totals 4. Mailing List 5. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July 23, 1986, August 13, 1986 and August 27, 1986, 0288e/3 I 'M NP'•~! • 'I J'~ r y. tzm- Z- 174 1 e F 1 x rsar ~ ~il ` z • 1606 11 ~ •1'iCN NJ•0 P t~ 24 J W I ~ i r. M1lfb• a 5~~~Z; A. I p. II ~Il 4 ~ ~ V 1`_ ~ II rrr~:iw y~~'~•IY'~ .~f~M • +MyM~+•Tr.r il~►Y rr~~Y r y e a zM3f R 'TIC I - I I 1~ • i 1lnYl . 'f 1 ~ MAx ( ~ / nllgrr ~ ` vNIIr~41.. 12 , .unr uv' I wl i 1 ~ f f.., 77 { ~ I 1. IlO M1U /)IW~ ~f v.nr KRi~ MIA w r. ~-182 1 0 ~7 I f i yy~~ { .PU KM • W1elw I ~ f lif~ T~_ l •;fIi'I':' II ChRaK!'ll fl NAYl41RN 1lICNGR ~.~C f7ME EMINEGf{tlR7 x. R[wYwtl r,an •.NU,a CIiANUY talrtu, p rAld beau 40 L~,Own$a 1_ nrrw,ttwt/tM11twrlMN S►N 5 PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1824 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received 1 1 L a AU N i 33,0 d1w.L~. 7S2r; it"Pt rA. ~~g e~ mamma" Eupora P 4 Z Minutes July 13, 1986 Page 7 said that there is specific performance requirements for both parties involved. He said that on the plat there is dedicated right-of- and building setback. He said that s 41 foot back to back north/south collector street along east property line will be constructed. He said that this request is consistent with plans for the area. • IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the property is in t e pT " roces`s~of being platted. She said that this is the proposed location of a school to be opened in September of 1987. She said that extensive utility improvements must be completed. She said that a school is allowed in all districts except a parking district. She said that the portion of land on the west side is for a ppark site. She added that staff recommends approval of Z-1813. REBUTTAL: Mr. Burke stated that he is available for quest oafs. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Ms. Cole moved to recommend approval of Z-1 3. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and unanimously carried (6-0). U, Z-1824. Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, Trustee, requestin a change in xoninyy from agricultural 0 (A) to single family-7 (SF-7) on 1S6.044 acres, The property is located 2,500 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the B. M. Rogers Survey 1101, J. Rogers Survey 1084, and J, Re ers Survey 108S. If approved, the property may be utilised for any purpose allowed in the SF-7 district. Bight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; two reply forms were received in favor; no reply forms were received In opposition. PETITIONER: Brian Burke, Burke bngineering, stated tha'r thhis request is 156 acres of proposed SF-7. He said that physical, constraints take up a great deal of the western edge of the property. He said that in regard to the in- tensity, this tract will be close to four units per acre. He said that they are interested in satisfyins as to the intent with the 60 foot right-of-way and SO foot building line. He said that there has been a precedent set by the school plat. He said that there are a lot of variables on this tract and would hate to lay out the project right now and be committed to the plan as with a planned development. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: Linda Howes, Old Alton Esistes, stated that her concern was that 1S6 acres could yield a lot of SF-7 units. She s4id that Hickory Creek Road Is a very small road and the traffic on Teasley Lane is getting heavier all the time. She suggested that some of this ores be SF-10 be- cause the lots next to this property hate been approved . for SF-' use. STAFF PORTt Ms. Carson stated that if this tract of IS6 acres s approved alonit Ath the already soproved 60 acres of SF-7 in area there will be 116 acres of SF-7 r.oning in one area. She said that diver,4ity in the area it i■por- tent. She said that staff had sus ezted additional SF-10 as Ms. Howes but no additional SF-10 was providrd. Sbe , i , Y 4 Z Minutes July 13, 18b6 Page a said that 120 feet of right-of-way is the maximum required by the city. She said that Mr, Compton has a condition to pave a 24 foot section of Hickory Creek Road and this de- veloper will only have to do perimeter street paving along the northern section of Hickory Creek Road along the fron- tage, She said that there are no technical violations but ' that staff is concerned about the amount o' SP-7 in the area. She added that staff recommends approval. Mr. Holt asked if the Loop goes down Hickory Creek Road, will it need 200 feet or more of right-of-way. Ms. Carson said a minimum of 200 to 220 feet. Mr. Holt said that the city can only require 120 feet of right-of-way, Ms. Carson stated that this is correct, She said with a planned de- velopment they could request a So foot building setback with n,) parking or building as a condition. She added that the state is hesitant to accept a road alignment if the right-of-way has not been guaranteed by the city. Mr. Holt asked about land uses on the southeast part of the Loop. Ms, Carson said that the property at Brush Creek Road on the north has open space for the right-of- way for the Loop throu~h the planned development. She said that the planned ovelopsent at Robinson kdad and State School has taken the 220 feet into consideration on their plan and the planned developments on Hickory Creek Road have a setback. Mr. Clark stated that there is a ;mall conflict in the area on Brush Creek Road across from the Jo Storer prop- erty because the property has already developed before the city knew that maybe the Loop would be going in this direction. Ms. Brock stated that the city can only require 120 feet of right-of-way with straight zoning but with a planned development the city can require more. Ms. Carson said that the developers had a concern that they could not meet the requirements of the planned development ordinance. RBBUTTAL., Mr, Burke stated that on density it is not pons a to achieve over 4 or 4.25 units per acre. He said that they are open about the dedication of the right-of-way and building setback. He said that it is advantageous for them to cooperate, Mr. Bscue stated that with straight zoning the Commission could only zone land not make conditions, Gene Worrell, Worrell $ Associates, stated that they would like to provide a street dedication ussement which would include-the 50 foot building setback as a separate Instru- ment which is an easement at this point. He said that this would establish the right-of-way dedication and the legal mechanism when property is platted to gain a dedication of the SO foot building setback. He said that the only reason they did not want to do a planned development iv because it is expensive and they are not sure when they are going to develop this property. Mr. Hunter stated to meat the legal department requiremerits the legal instrument would need to be done first with a re,- versionary clause. He said that the city cannot do con- tract or condition zoning in this case. Ms. Brock asked if the Comission could table until the docuaeat is filed and additional information is provided. - . July 23, 1986 page y Mr. Kamman asked if there is a conflict among staff. Ms. Carson said that it is not necessarily a conflict but a matter of when the best time or form to acquire the right-of-way and building setback needed by the city, Mr. Holt stated that platting could be put off for three years or longer. Ms, Carson said yes, Mr. Ellison stated that the petitioner could replat and • include the 2S foot building setback required by the ordinance. Mr. bolt asked if there is protection with the easement. Mr. Clark stated that the easement is a more definite commitment. Ms. Brock asked if there is a cost to the developer if the case is tabled, Mr. Ellison stated that it could be put on a subsequent agenda and would not be readvertised. Mr. Clark stated that the petitioner needed to file the document within two weeks. Mr. Hunter said yes. He said that this case is not contract or condition zoning but something the petitioner has agreed to do. He said that it is not dedicated to the city but that as long as there is a legal document the city has the right to use the easement. Mr. Worrell stated that they are trying to find a mocha- nism to assure the dedication of right-of-way and building setback. He said that it would cost Mr. Tucker money if tabled. . Chair declared public nearing closed. iIECiSIUN: Mr, Ellison stated that the Commission needed io 3edr with the land use of SF-7 and not get sidetracked on one issue. Mr. Escue stated that he personally did not object to SF-7 land use. He stated that there is a blab concentration in the area but that it is not unusually dense for this area. Ms. Brock stated that she did not object to SF-7 in that area but that she did not want to approve without guaran- tee of the road. Mr. Holt agreed. Mr. Halt moved to table Z-1824 until the next agenda. Seconded by Ms. Cole. Mr. Ellison stated that he didn't know if it was possible to do in two weeks. Ms. Carson stated that the Commission needed to table 2.1824 until the August 13 or August 27 meeting. Mr. Ellison stated that staff's concern is legality and practically in regards to the public because this case will not be readvertised. Mr. Holt ailed Ms. Cole withdr.,w their motion and second. Mr. Holt mSecondedtable Ms. Colo the August 13 1966 (6-0). Mr. Worrell asked how they would o about preparing this legal document. Mr. Hunter stated that the city can 0}`°"M °r""~.s~:F Sit July 1N3t,hlut: Page 10 prepare a legal document with a reversionary clause but that he suggested the petitioner's lawyer to prepare the document. Ms. Carson stated if it is nct legal, the Commission could remove the request from the table and vote at the August L1 31986 mueting. E. Z-1825, Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, 'f` rustee, requesting change In zonin from agricultural (A) to multi-family •I (MY-) on 10.99 acres. The prop- erty is located 3,B50 feet west of FM 2161 (Tcasley Lane) ar-l shown In the B. MRogers Survey 1101. If approved, the property may be u;, lized for any use permitted in the MF-l district. Ono notice was mailed to property owner within 200 feet; no reply form was received in favor or opposition. PETITIONEkt Orion Purke, Burke Engineering, stated that t e acres of multi-family is located on the collector street in recognition of factors of surroundin; pproperty. He said that they could not realistically abide by the one- half mile spacing. He said that this is the best- location with the best transition. He said that it would Se physi- cally impossible to construct over 200 units. He added that they have no frontage on the proposed Loop 188. IN FAVOR: Nona present. UPPOSEDt Mitchell fur nor, speaking on behalf of southeast e1 n` o ; stated that he is opposing the case for three rea- sons: 1) violates city planning policy, 2) setting up as a separate zoning entity instead of a planne4 development, ands) the density is objectionable. He said that this area needs to be confined to s low density area and curtail the current trends of the city. Linda Howes, Old Alton Bstates, stated that she agreed with Mr. Turner. She said that the area for the school will be overcrowded when built without the multi-family units. She said that multi-family units are all over town and there is no need for them In this area. STAFF RNPUAT: Ms, Carson stated that the property is 10- cate in a ow intensity area according to the Denton De- veloppwent Guide, She said that these areas are the primary housing areas for the City of Denton and should emphasize residential use rather than commercial or employment uses. She said that a sulti-family-l district requires a minimum 6,000 square foot lot and the maximum lot coverage by the buildin s is 401. She said that based on the standards provided considering minimum land aria that 479 efficiency units, 399 one bedroom units, or Vtwo bedroom units could be built and the buildings could be three stories in height. She said that the staff discussed the possibility of a planned development on this request and the request tionerewantedaihe flexibilit26allowed bysaid a that Toning request since according to tee petitioners they are market- ing not developing the property. She said that low inten- sity areas permit 200 units separated by one-half mile according to the Guide. While it is approximately one-half mile to the planned development (Z-1794) At Teasley Lane moderateointensity Rarea, wthehmulti-family 5In units the planned development (Z-1766) north of this project is only 1,400 to 1,500 fern away which is less than the ono-half mile separation. She said that staff recomenes denial of 6 L Minutes August 13, 1986 Page 11 V, CUNSIDERATIONS A, Z-1824, Petition of Sandera Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, ie`e, requesting a change in zoning from agriculture! prroo to single fsmily-7 (SF-7) on 156,044 acres, The Lane) arty and is south located 2,500 feet west of FM 2191 (Teasley B, M. Rogers survey Hickory Creek Road and shown in the . lIOi, J, Rogers Survey 1084, and J. Rogers survey 1085, If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose allowed in the SF-7 rfstrlcr. Ms. Brock made the motion to remove Z-1824 from the table, seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (5-0), ST FF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the petitioner re- tksoste that the itere be continued on ee the in ormation about tho easement dadicationlhasenotsbeen submitted. She stated that the wetback request may be ad- dressed as a condition to a pplanned development district or be requested during the plattin that the Commission and City Council pshould.notcosaid der the proposed easement as part of the land use and plan ning issue, She aid that if the Commission agrees that the land use is acceptable and the pp fare can be postponed, the Comm ission sayfwish toorecommend approval; however, if the Commission feels that the land use and thoroughfare planning should both be considered then the Commission may wish to recommend denial, The Commission may consider this item this evening or table the item until the August 13, 1986 meeting, DECISION: Mr Holt moved to table Z-1824 until the August 717TW meeting, seconded by Ms. Brock and unanimously carried (S-0), B• UBYBLUPMENT GUIDE POLICIES Ms. Carson stated that the staff is preoarln a letter from the Planning and Zoning Commission (o the City Council requesting a joint session on September 9 The letter will be forwarded to the City Council after6it is $i ned by the Commission. The letter explains to the Council the reasons for requesting tine t si to discuss the policies in Best Denton and the firsesst coonme, first serve intensity allocation, Ms. Carson Informed the Commission that two zoning requests at the intersection of Kings Row and Loop 188 have been ` submitted to the Planning Department, She added the peti- tioners have indicated an interest in established as a moderate Intensit havingg this area would create a node if both are epproved,and the requests Commission if they were Interested In conducting saestgaye session to evaluate the policy at Kings Row and Loop 288. The Commission decided to conduct a study session on August 20, 1986 at 5:OU p.m. Ms. Carson informed the Commission that Mr. Lacquement had made several changes in the concept plan for 2-1815 since i the Commission public hearing. She stated that the con- cept plan was an improvement over the plan the Commission and addresses most of theobiisactions staff had menti,ned at the Commission meeting, TTie City Council will receive a staff analysis of the revised request at its August 190 1996 meeting. Meeting adjourned at 11:50 p.m. f , . t4 r~ p b Z Minutes August 27, IVSO Page 18 V. CONSIDERATIONS RF7" A. Z1814, Petition of Sanders Campbell and Rayburn Tucker, `trustee, requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family-7 SSF-7) on 156.044 acres. The property is located 2,5 0 feet west of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) and south of Hickory Creek Road and shown in the B. M. Rogers Survey 1101, J, Rogers Survey 1084, and J. Rogers Survey 1085. If approved, the pproperty may be utilized for any purpose allowed in the SF-7 district. Me. Brock made the motion to remove Z-1824 from the table. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and unanimously carried (b-0). STAFF REPoKT: Ms. Carson stated that most of the items of c ncern-Ra4S been addressed as far as the land use ques- tion is concerned and that staff did recommend approval of SF-7 land use on this particular tract. She said that the Commission received a memo from Mr. Morris that stated specifically that the Commission should consider the land use issue at this time and that the other issues could be addressed during the platting stage, She said that staff has taken no action to confider any type of contracts or agreements because the other issues are not an item of concern at this time. She said that staff requests that the Commission make a recommendation on the land use issue as to whether the SF-7 is an appropriste land use or not. She added that the petitioner is aware of the situation, PETITIONER: Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, stated that M clients are in agreement. He said that they feel SF-7 is an a propriate land ute and asked that the Commission would give favorable consideration. DECISION: Mr. Bscue moved to recommend approval of Z-if2_T;r Seconded by Mr. Claiborne. Ms. Brock stated that this tract and the surrounding tracts should be a lanned development because of the problem with the other tracts that the Commission was unable to recommend approval. She said that she hated to see this tract approved withnut it being a planned development. Mr. Claiborne stated that he empathized with her point of view. He said that a planned development is used by the City to gain extra control. tie said that the number one question is if this is an appropriate land use. He sail that he realized as a citizen that money will have to be spent to obtain right-of-way. Vote was called and motion carried (5.1). Ms. Brock voted no. j "z 7 NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING NAP OF THE CITY OF DBNTON, TEX0.3, AS SAME WAS AP^PTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY UN DENTON TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SHAD MAP APPLIES TO APPRdXIMATELY 156.044 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED 2,500 FEET WEST OF P.M. 2181 (TEASLEY LAMB) AND SOUTH OF HICKORY CREEK ROAD, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO SINGLE FAMILY "SP-7" CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SA'D PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $10000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY 010AINSt SECTION I. That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable to all or part of the property Described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Inc orporated by reference herein is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use to Single Family "SP-7" District Classification r.nd Use under the Compre- hensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION 11. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the sane is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. SECTION 111. That the City Council of tk City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION IV. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding one Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be J-emed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or contittued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION V_ That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the Mate of its passage, and the City Secretary is 1-1924/PAGE 1 hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record -Chronicle, ti!e official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS ATTEST: CHMOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETAity CITY OF DENTON,jTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOU DEBRA. ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: Z-1324/PAGE 2 71"7 ^ tifNINIT all' , ' FIELD NOTES ':o all that oert4itT tract of tend situated is the R,lt. Rogers Survey Ab- straot Hu her 1101, J, RoprA Survar Abstract )umber 1084 sad the Jr Inters Swr"y Abstract Nsembor 1015, Deatas County, Tess mad beity 4 part of the 4 tr4ets dascrib- ad in the Dead *atva" SOX interest fr.ss Raybueu Twakor, Trustee to $&Were Camp- bell reearr;,;d in Volume 613 Paso 277 of the Dead Records of Denton Countyp Texas, the eubJ "t tract being note particularly described as follows SECINWM for the Northeast Corner of the tract being described herein, at a.pnint in the East line of the said Tucker-Caambell Tract in tN4 last line of the said D,N. AOgers Survey, said point being South 01 Do"* 43 Minutrs Best a distance of 10.00.. feet from A P,K, na11 at the Northeast Corner of the said Tuoker-Camoball Tracts e THENCE South 01 Doeres 43 Minute. 00 Seconds West continuing with the said East line 14nerally with,a (anee a distance of 2204,25 feet to an iron rod in the North line of a Texan Nsmicipal Power Altncy easements THENCE South 49 Degrees 34 Minuten 36 Sooaodo West with the North lisle of the Said 44e0ment a distanoe of 3504.56 feet to an iron cell for the soot Southerly Corner of the herein described tract, said iron.rod being in the Northerly line of Tract P- 536 of Ur4a-Little Elm Aeserveirs THENCE North 37 Degrees 26 Minutes 05 Secnnds Nest with the Northerly tine of the eaid reservoir a distance of 755.42 foot to a concrete mommagot at an anal* point thereinf THENCE North 89 D^gress 58 Minutes 05 Saonnda West continuing with said line passing the West lion of the maid S,y. Rooters Survey a distance of 883..J0 feet to a concrete monument at An Anal* point in said lines THENCE North 33 Degrees 24 Minutes 40 Seconds West continuing with the eaid line croAel" Fletcher Croak a distance of 1019,48 feet to a oonorete monument at the West-Southwast Corner of tho said Tucker-Catspboll Trash THENCE' North 01 Degree 43 Minutes 00 Seconds East with the Nest line of the said Tunker-Cass"bell Tract a distance of 1778«01 feet to a Doint for the Northwest Cor- ner of the herein described tract, said point being South 01 Deares 43 Ninutes 00 Soemnds Waat a distance of 80.00 foot from an iron rod at, the Northwest Corner of the said tract) THENC4 South 89 Degrees 05 Minutes 31 Seorinds East with a line 80.00 feet South of and parallel with the North line of the said Tuoker-Campbell Tract a distance of 300.00 feat to a point in the West line of a 13,410 more tract being a pronoAed school tracts THENCE South 01 Decree 43 Minutes 00 Seconds West with the Nest line of the sold school tract, 300.00 foot East of And parallel with the West line of the said Tuoker-Cawpbetl Tract a diatanne of 659.50 feet to en iron rod at the Southwest Corner of the said school treats THENCE SootE 99 Degrees 05 r„nutes 31 Seconds East with the south line of the said anhool tract a distanoe of 730.40 foot to a point in a curve to the left having a radius of 6:0.00 feet$ THENCE in A Southaasterly direction along the are of the said curve and are dist- ance of 351,01 Coat ( chord baArina of South 14 Degrees 19 Minutes 18 Seconds East a distance of 346.49 foot ) to a point at the end of tha said curve and the beginnina of another curve to the right havinA a radius of 57040 feet) THENCE in a Southeasterly direction Along the ►re of the said curve an are dist- ance of 159,.48 feet ( chord bearina of South 22 DeArota 16 Minutes 05 Seconds Eant a distance of 136.06 feet ) to a neint for a reentrant corner of the heroin described tract) THENCE Sasth 89 Degrees 05 Mir.utes 31 Seconds not a dist utae of 49944 feo^, to A Point far A reentrant enrn4e of the herein described tracts THENCE North 01 Degree 43 Minutes 00 Seconds East with a line parallel with the East line of the said Tucker-Campbell Tract a distance of 1140.000 feet to a point being $OWN loot South of the Notth line of the said Tucker-Cameuell Tract; TNENCI South 89 Degrees 05 Minutes 31 Stea O test with a line 90,00 fast South of and parallel with the North line of the said Tuoker-Campbol'; Tt"t a distanoe of 1374.38 foot to the PLACE Of 81n02NNINO mad "closing 156.0A4 acres of land, 1-1834 DATE. 10/07/66 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT } T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDIN WE - x-1828 RECOMMENDATION: The Planningg and Zoning Commission recommends approval by a vote of 6-0. SUMMARY: A request for an amendment to a planned development (Ordinance 85-256) and approval of a detailed plan on 18.543 acres. The amendment would permit the development of 220 attached residential units. BACKGROUND: The property is located in a low intensity area currently under the intensity standard. The original planned development permitted duplex, triplex and multi-family land uses with a total 198 units. The amendment would eliminate these land uses and replace the area with attached residential units and increase the density by a total of 22 units. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Nineteen (19) property owners within two hundred feet were notified. All departments involved in the development process will be affected, FISCAL IMPACT: No impact can be determined at this time. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Hariell Prepared by: City Manager Cecile Carson Urban Planner Appro d: Jeff Meye Director of Planning and Development 02610 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1828 Meeting Date: October 7, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Metroplex Engineering Corporation 1123 Fort Worth Drive Denton, Texas 76205 Status of Applicant: Engineer Requested Action: An amendment to a planned devoLopment and approval of a detailed plan and preliminary plat for the development of 220 attached residential units at 11.9 units per acre. Location and Size: An 18.543 acre tract located at the southeast corner of FM 1830 (Country Club Road) and Hobson Lane. Surrounding Land Use and zoning: North - Residential, agricultural South - Residential, agricultural East - Residential agricultural, single family-16 West - Townhouses, multi-family, retail, LI, PD Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Perimeter paving on Hobson Lane will be required and Hobson Lane would require a four lane divided section with 40 feet of right-of-way from center line. Fifty (50) feet of right-of-way is required on F14 18304 Utilities: An existing 16" water line is subject to pro rata charges. The sanitary sewer line must be installed to the Hickory Creek outfall. An oversizing of sewer line to 12" inches may be requested. (Case 2-1828) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION {Continued) Drainage: Drainage plans on plat are acceptable and additional review will be done with final plat to set finished floor elevations. Detention needs to be designed for whole basin if it is to be in line. HISTORY On June 14, 1985, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied a request for a mixed use planned development on this property and the additional nine (9) acres to the east and at the southeast corner of Hobson Lane and FM 1830. A, second petition was submitted, and the City Council adopted an ordinance zoning this property on December 18, 1985. The planned development includes general retail, multi-family-1 (21 units/acre), duplex (9 units/ acre), triplex (6 units/acre), garden homes (4 units/acre), townhomes (10 units/acre), and oY)en space. ANALYSIS The property is located in a low intensity area currently under the intensity standard. The approved planned development is predominately residential which is consistent with Development Guide policies. While the approved planned development provides diversity it could be argued that seven land uses on a 27 acre parcel is too much diversity. The petitioner upon reviewing the vast diversity and the physical appearance of the property decided to request an amendment to the planned development. The proposal would eliminate the duplex, triplex and multi- family uses and replaces the uses with 22G attached residential units. The total units for the approved planned development on this 18.54 acre tract are 198 units, and the proposal would increase the total by 22 units, Although the total units would be increased, the petitioner had an extensive tree survey for the property prepared. The detailed plan shows both the tree masses and existing trees over three inches in diameter measured six feet from ground level, The amendment if approved would allow for a majority of the trees on the property to be saved and additional open space to be provided. The density proposed of 11,9 un!,ts per acre does not violate the multi-family policies of concentration or separation because 12 units or more is considered multi-family. (Case # Z-1828) Page Three RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1828 with the following conditions; by a vote of 6-Os 1, Existing trees as shown on the detailed plan shall not be removed due to construction or excavating of the site, 2, Signs shall conform to City of Denton Sign Ordinance. 3. Maximum square footage of the recreational building shall be 4,500 square feet, ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1, Location Map 2, Detailed Plan 3. Preliminary Plat (Country Club Place) 4. Landscaping Plan 5, Development Standards 6. Ordinance 85-256 7. Reply Form Totals 8. Mailing List 9. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of August 27, 1986, 0260k s. - a of 8281", j..j... I- • .rte . ♦ ` f r ♦ . ~Mr~r~ r rrr~r rM~ 1 lie 1 w•ww+ O I r•~ +w Zo" l~rwr+r O (mil"••„ POOL APKA. c I O O O M-M 09M R& MAL I ~ O , Az-r2 A A30-32 t / 01-02 o ~I 838-12 O 220 LPM o Q o %cb PMOW MM 364 CAM ACW& PAMM NO CAM 00 IL M AMS f DEM9TY 11A iRRB/AG10 TWO GOURfs O A2 I , 1 1 ! 1 I r~ 1 .....r J 7 0 4 117tH. , MMs owr MI •NR Waft" L"M W r I II J} a "Im 00" N MTO L o f •NwUOVA777OM 0 ow O 711.;1..1 t o O I / r M RAM"111 NWOM 1r V . W Mm IN "M %U M 1AMM&OW a &M MM rw 1 + ` ~ I ~I ! O Pt+dl. AIWA M + * .u ' rr ~ ~.owrriww•n. • rwr~ r".{ RECEIVED AUG 2 7 1986 W.~ A N I E L S U R V E Y A- 3 7 8 ~ , 4 A IL ~ ~ 1 \ \ \ A[R G.l1UlE FOM[ / ~f ~ 1 , HCBSON LANE Z -W tam - - r / '1 i I M.M I / IkH N 1 i `BITE i MEA I 1( f ~ war i 1 r d .~1 lOT At l~ XL1111 I ~ 1 , ;o ~ II \ LOCATION Map a Rf ` ~ 4 ~ J IN, i I r try li f R 4 i III / / ll! I '`y' I SI/OIYMI~INNAI~Y I~N > an to 9 1- R 1 p N dig - Y f 1f U 414 07 Q. µ I / 1f1 V' ~ - - MoNf1 ~ ~ , + A.N;0110 I w oAm I NI wa Sholotpom V i A~ M V AOICVLTWL `[o1i1"'~ I 111116114,10 r 1 T. M A R T I N S U R V E Y A 9 0 0 l M YK Ipd11M101~Y19.oN[ ~ BILL tl~~~ M1111IM,1y1 RA1 Ct oNTPY CLUS PLACE 1t 0~y~~1V[~k[ CITY w 11100N,1NOtWOMYCpwy. TWO METNKKX DMINM"S ews"ATICM v*1Mm1N[ f KAMnw f [111vtYIM 21 firi /OMt h"TN NIIIVt 06n: ftfw n o~Ne _y y~ BCAIt DATE in ND. r..rwrr d1Et11[IR f.~.f, i~•1001 OWN 660316 n ilk) Y . 4n Y ff 42~4. - . c t Ira= . 1 z -vim i Plant List/Landscape Plan Legend Shade or Ornamental Trees LO - Live Oak B Pear - Bradford Pear CB - Cedar Elm Shrubs or Ground Covers TYH - Yaupon Holly DYH - Duarf Yaupon Holly DBH - Duarf Barberry WAX - Waxleaf Ligustrum PHOT - Photinia LIR - Lirope 09 July 1986 86-0146. PD PLANNED DEVE PM NT DFSIGN STATEMENT Bill Garner Equity Search Realty, Inc. 1. Statement of intent A. To develop a single family attached community, tennis and pool facilities as well as open apace. B. Development and marketing to commence upon final plat approval. 2. Relation to Comprehensive Plan The proposed district is in a low intensity zone according to the City of Denton Development Guide. This development has been designed to meet the intent of the Development Guide. 3. Acreage Acreage - 18.543 acres 4. Land Uses A. Existing land use - single house, agricultural, pasture - 18.543 acres B. Proposed land uses single family attached - 18.543 acres 5. Off-Site Inforntion As shown on the Detailed Plan 6. Traffic and Transportation As shown on the Detailed Plan A. Projected amnlint of traffic: Total - 22u. V.T.D. 7. Buil- diss A. Approximate location: As shown on the Detailed Plan B. Maximum height: 45-foot, two-story C. Minimum building setbacks: As shown on Concept Plan 30 feet along right-of-way 16 feet along property line D, Maximum total gross floor area: N.A. E, Number of dwelling units and unite per acre: 220 urjita - 11.9 d.u./acre 8. Reaid~ ew ti` Subdivigigns N.A. 91 Water and Drainage As shown on Preliminary Plat 106 Utilities . As shown on Preliminary Plat 11. Trees As shown on Detailed Plan, There are tree masses located on the property with Oaks 3 inches in diameter or greater. A maJority can be saved with the land uses proposed. 12. Open Space As shown on Detailed Plan - Minimum 30% 13. Sar~,geninA As r,hown on the Detailed Plan 14. Development Schedulg A. Estimated start of construction: 1986 8, Development to occur upon final plat approval September 1986. Compietion by'June 1987. 1284L E i r i NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TEXAS AS SAME WAS ZONING MAP OF THE CIiY OF DENTON, , ADOPTED AS ANAPPENDIX TO T • UkDINAiVCE3 OF THE CITY OF EDENTON D AS T HE CODE OF AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAp APPLIES Tp 27.2874y q~REgttO~F o ~ LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF F,M. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN TO P1830 OLOVIDED FORR A C LANE AS ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT C ASS IIN CATION M40 USE DESIGNATION TO Pt 11 TRIC - E CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION;NPROVIDINGpFOR A"PENALTY INA MAX F RIANMEFECTYVEFDATE~00'00 FOR VIOLATIOtiS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEJIA,q, HEREBY ORDAINS; SECT N I, That the toning classification and use designation of the following described property, to-wit; All ct of Abstract Numbern900ain thelC % ofuDenton,~ Denton County,STex&sg and being part of the called 40 more tract described in the dead from Allen Hadewell, at us, to J, W. Bovell, recorded in Volume ' 185 Page 127 of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texas; the subject tract being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING for the southeast corner of the tract being } described herein, at the northeast corner of the tract described in the dead from C. J. 8ova11 to A. H. Word, recorded in Volume 447, page 311 of the said Dead Records and being in the east line of the said 40 acre tract, 400 feet north from the southeast corner thereof; THENCE west with the north line of the said Word Tract a distance of 1292 feet to the northwest corner thereof in the east right-of-way line of F.M. 1830; THENCE north with the said east right-of-way a distance of 920 feet to a point fpr a corner Ln Hobson Road; THENCE east with Hobson Road a distance of 1292 feet to a point in the east line of the said 40 acre tract; THENCE mouth with the east line of the 40 acre tract a distance of 920 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 27.2874 acres of land; is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use designation to Planned Development "?D" District Classi- fication and Use destination under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City or Denton, Texas. SEC ION , That prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any building within the district, the following conditions shall be mats Is That the areas desigjnated for "du lax" use, ms shown on the attached site plane shell be developed and used in accordance with the toning regulations applicable to two-family dwelling mooing districts. 1 I .i':i: f 2. That the area designated for'"Ct,iplex" use, as shown on the attached site plan, shall be developed in accordance with the zoning regulations applicable to SF-7 zoning districts, except that the minimum lot sizes shall be 9,000 square feet. 3. That the area designated for "gardenhome" use, as shown on the attached site plan, shall be developed and used in accordance with the zoning regulations applicable to SF-7 zoning districts, except that each main building fo- each lot may be located so as to extend into one side yard setback fcr each lot, so long as such side yard setbacks being used for adjoining lots are not abutting. k. That the area designated for "townhouse" use, as shown on the attached site plan, shall be developed in accordance with the zoning regulations applicable to SF-7 zoning distric s, except that the minimum lot size shall be 2,700 square feet and the main buildings thereon shall be attached, 5. That the area designated for the "multi-family" use, as shown on the attached site plan, shall be developed and used in accordance with the zoning regulations applicable to Mfr-1 zoning districts. 6. That the development and use of the district shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan attached hereto, or any mite plan hereafter approved for all or part of said district, and any conditions herein contained. 7. That no detached signs shall be permitted in the district, 8. That landscaping plans must be submitted for the area designated as "general retail" and "multi-family" on the attached site plan prior to any development of that arms. 9. That sidewalks meetingy City specifications shall be constructed on one side of eaon scremt adjacent to or within the development. S&OTION 111. A. That the City Council approves the comprehensive site Plan for the areas designated for "duplex," "multi-family," 'triplex," "townhouse," and "gardenhome" use, as shown on the attached site plan, in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance. S. That prior to any development or construction within the area designated on the attached site plan for general retail (Ott) use, a comprehensive site plan for such rrsa shall be submitted for approval in accordance with the procedures required for approval of pl&onod development districts. C. That the approval of the district showing a general retail area on the attached site plan shall not be doomed approval of such designated area for any particular land use but shall be construed only to mean that uses allowed in genera retail zoning districts on the date such comprehensive site plan is submitted, may be considered as possible appropriate uses of such designated area at the time such plan is submitted therefore, the approval thereof to be determined upon consideration of such factors which slay include, but not be limited to the following: tits time slapsod from the effective date of this ordinance to the date such corehensive site plan is submitted for such area; the number mp o proposed buildings, dwelling units or proposed uses, the arrangement and design of tlir buildings, areas, utiregullitiesons ati ando b ropos ed a ~ Parking t oe ther develaosuch arrea, and the t SECTION aturiits • i~ 0~y APlied The Zoning Map of the City 14th day of January, 1959, as of Denton Ordinances of the CiC APArndix a to ' adopted the 69-lo -F, as amended, be, andithi nt1424 oas is under the Code of such char in District Cl above con di assificat ion and hereby amended nator chow and spec ificatione, rubJ*ct to the SECTION V~ That the City Council of the Clty Of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such Change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting city of Denton 'texas, and with reasonaible Cons welfare of the Other things for the character of the districts and o foramits peculiar suitability or particular uses conserving the value of the buitdin and with a view, to and encoura ins the coat e gs, protectin h maximum one it to the kos o proPriate uses of glandu forivthe City t Denton. Texas, and its citizens, SEC IOM VI. Any person who shall violate a or provision of this ordinance, fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a be guilty of permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall a misdemeanor unishable b One Thousand Dollars ($10008 Y a Fine nos exceeding Ported 'Do)' Each such person shall be portion gthareot durinep which anyevioletton each this ordina day or Cotmitted, or continued, and upon coyeviction of any violations such person shall be Punished within the limits above such 3ECTINVL That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) ds om the date of its hearyebyt directed to sa cause the capt L on end of this ordinance to be published twine !n the Dentonltroord the City Secretary is newspaper ofitsthepasyagrCity of~Denton, Texas, within lti Cho the date of n (10) days official PASSED MD APPKOVED this the p,~ day of 19$l ATT9STs CF OR D1ON, Teus CITY Or 09MTON,~TaXAg APPAOVLD AS TO LZQ" FORM, Dt"A ADANI OPAYOVITCk, CITY ATTOMjy CITY Of DXNTON, TLW 0,0 t. , IWO M a p M » N K ~ Aa a1 Y M r r K Y N if M ~f N N N . r ~ I "gr..rrrrR•"""vm,~,Vw • .tr'/. U~ N 1 of L»~ie '.a~uf r+plr . •i L1S ~ ~ t / &*ia L 1 i+ ~i V.bl ~ '.1 Iw1 MMay t~ , r 7lafarl ; 1 ~amr i 4.1 or"GOV Arm" PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL 2-1828 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received L`y I ,04 7 d o 9 S. wc,.,.~` aD 41 r r.rti~! 7 JJI 04 ~ G•f c ww~ / ~ iL P A Z Minutes August 27, 1986 Page 5 B. Z-1828. Petition of Metroplex Engineering requesting an F7 amendment of an existing planned development, approval of theeCountrypClub FlacepAddttionfonhanp18.543nacreptractf located at the southeast corner of PM 1830 (Country Club Road) and Hobson Lane, The property is further described as a tract in the T. MartJn Survey, Abstract 900, if approved, the amendment will permit the development of 220 attached residential units with a density of 11.9 units per acre, Nineteen notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; no reply forms were received fn favor or opposition. PETITIONER: Greg Edwards, Metroplex Engineering Corpora- tion, stated that this planned development Is an amendment. He said that a portion of the original planned development is being proposed for detailed site plan approval with slight modifications to the types of land uses that were originally proposed and approved, He said that the devel- oper was concerned about the marketing of duplex, tri-plex, and multi-family approved in the planned development. He said that there is substantial amount of existing trees plan. prHeaxa)dcrhat this plane Improvesithetbufferingntto the south and west and improves the sense of community. Mr, Claiborne asked how many units were they proposing in varlesnwithdaamaximumlof4sixteern. Edwards they number re the two story buildings with eight divisions. Ms. Brock asked about the density of tho remaining areas statedsthat they kgeremainedathetsame, H; said that the den homes are four units per acre and the townhomes are ten units or acre. Ms. Brock asked about the total number of units for the entire planned development, Mr. Edwards said 263. IN FAVOR: Bill Garner stated they were concerned about Tfie"'1'r es because the property was a nursery. He said that with majority of trees to be saved. He said that they received favorable assistance from the city staff. uPPOSBD; None present. Mary Tishner, 3301 Country Club Road, asked if there were any three story buildings, Mr. Edwards said no and that they had received favorable comments from the neighborhood, JLUF_REPURT: Ms. Carson stated that the property is locator- n a low Intensity area currently under the in- tensity standard. She said that the approved planned development is predominately residential and consistent with Development Guide policies, While the approved planned development provides diversity, the petitioner upon reviewing the vast diversity and the physical appear- ance of the property decided to request an amendment to the planned development. The proposal would eliminate the duplex, tri plex, and multi-family uses and replaces the uses with 220 attached residential units. The total units for the approved planned development are 198 units, and the proposal would increase the total by 22 units. She said that although the total units would ba increased, the petitioner had an extensive tree survey for the property P 6 Z Minutes August 27, 1986 Page 6 • prepared. She said that the amendment if approved would allow for a majority of the trees on the property to be saved and additional open space to be provided. She said that the density proposed of 11,9 units per acre does not violate the multi-family policies of concentration or separation and staff recommends approval of Z-1828 with conditions, Mr. Claiborne asked about the details of the maximum height of the buildings. Ms. Carson stated that it was maximum two stories, Mr. Claiborne asked about the signage in the general re- tail area, Ms. Carson stated that it is a separate issue, Mr. Claiborne asked if the rigns were for the advertise- ment of the residential development, Ms. Carson said yes and the signs would be located on Hobson and 1830. She said that the signs will conform to the Sign Ordinance, Ms, Brock asked about the buffering between the general retail and the residential area, Ms. Carson stated that they had no specifics about where the general retail building will be located but that there are tree masses and open space behind that area She said that the closest structures are the tennis courts, Ms. Brock asked about the pool areas and if they are re- quired with this plan. Ms. Carson stated that the site plan indicates the location of the pools but that there is nothing to force them to build them, he stated that the city can enforce the preservation of the trees. iti3iiUr'fAL: None offered, Chair declared public hearing closed. DOCISIONi Mr, Bscue stated that he thought that the plan was R improvement and that it iustlfied the increased number of units which was minimal in this case and pro- vid-id a much better appearance. Mr, Glasscock stated that this fa a pretty piece of proper- ty that Is well planned and will enhance the neighborhood. Mr, liscue moved to recommend approval of Z-1828 with the following conditions: 1. Existing trees as shown on the detailed plan shall not be removed due to construction or excavating of the site. 2. Signs shall conform to the City of Denton Sign Ordinance, 3, Maximum square footage of the recreational building shall be 4,S00 square feet, Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6.0). NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 8S-2S6 TO PROVIDE FOR THE APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR A PORTION OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT THEREIN APPROVED; AS SAID PLAN APPLIES TO 18.543 ACRES OF THE 27,2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT, AND BEING LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF F.M. 1830 AND HOBSON LANE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,00040 FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That Section II of Ordinance No. 85-2S6 is amended to read as follows; Section II. 1. That there is approved for 18,543 acres of land in said district, as described in Exhibit "A"", a detailed plan, labeled as Exhibit "B", said exhibits being attached hereto and incorporated by reference, so that hereafter the described land shall be used and developed in accordance with the approved plan. 2. That the area dosignated for "gardenhome" use, as shown on the attached "zoning change exhibit'", shall be developed and used in accordance with the zoning regulations applicable to SF-7. zoning districts, except that each main building or each lot may be located so as to extend into one side yard setback for each lot, so long as such side yard setbacks being used for adjoining lots are not abutting. 3. That the area designated for "townhouse" use, as shown on the attached "zoning change exhibit", shall be developed in accordance with the zoning regula- tions applicable to SP-7 zoning districts, except that the minimum lot size shall be 2 700 square feet and the main buildings thereon shall be attached, SECTION II. That Section III of Ordinance No. 8S-2S6 is repealed. Z-1828/PAGE ONE 7,i I S.BCTION III. That a co y of this ordinance shall be attached to Ordinance No. 85-256, showing the amendments made. SECTION IV. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000,00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY STEPHENSt MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CIMOTTE ALLEN CITY SMETUT CITY OF DENTON,oTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: D, f)nn Z-1828/PAGE TWO EXHIBIT "A" Ill that certain tract ur porcal of land sltuatud In the . L{u Survey, Abstract ract howna by f rti ha rt of it tract shown b , l)unton County, sairl tract b~rlm; 44+3, Ppga 291 y r xl to C.J. Aovell as resealed In Vol,una , end part of a tract Rhowa b rucurrled In Volume 41 L; Pnga 99 of y deed to J.D. flue»(( as fdH the Dead Ilacneds of Denton County, US, and 1x61113 more fully described ar fellows 3suitivitnR described IfareL,la xaidchpointnbuerrtiNUrthr39rde(rrees h 36 trnlcutes beilig seconds Fast, 202.OU fast from the northeast corner of skid C, J. Orwell tract, and also being in the south r(Ifit-of•rray title of 'lobsou La nu; Thence North 8) degrees 36 r,inutes 27, se oar line of said C,J. Oovell tenet, an,l the aautharight~ofnusy llina r of auirl Hobson Ln,,a, n distance of 433,;10 feat ri a point for the northe ast corner of the herein rleacriho,l tructt Thence South U7 degrees 35 minutes ail seconds Woat, J pansioR the south line of ve n,J. Dovell tract , the s;une belrta the north line of .ll. Dove I l tenet, In all n total liatanca of 552-63 feet to all ouale polntt RnLI 1'71,99 371,99 South U0 depress 20 minutes 43 RuconrlR 1snst, it distnnc9 elf ,99 fast to n point l'ur the southeeSt corner of tyre duscrfbad tracer said point at herein being in the south line of said J,14, . novel, tract, and in the north line of s tract shown by deed to (lord as recorded in Volume 447, Pane 91 Recurdas 1 of the Denton County Dead Thence ,South 89 degrees 38 minutes 40 seconds heat, along the Routh line of Said J.B. Aovall tract, and the north line t of said Nord tract, dlluetandesccs ofribed9G3t,rac04 feet to a point for the southwest earner of tiro s aaid) said Paint also being the southwest corner of said J,II. Anvetl tract, and the northweat corner of snid !lord tract, nod oleo being its the unst right-nf-way i(na of Farm-to-tlnrketload Number IIJJUI Thence North, along the west line of said J.A. Aovoll tract, and tho east right-of-way line of said Farm-to-tiarkst Road (lumber L9301 passing at 4W,20 feet the northwest corner of said J,D. M vall tract, the sank being the southwest corner of said C,J. Duveil tract, in all a total distance of 434,99 fat to a point for an ell corner( Thence North 89 degrees 36 minutes 22 seconds Bast, n distance of 202.00 feet to a point for on all corners Thence North, parallel with a 202.00 feat in and easterly direction from the west line of said C,J, Aovsll tract, and the nast right-of- way of raid Form-to-rlarket Road Number 1030, a distance of 483,21 foot to the Point of Deginning and containing 18,543 acres of land. 2-1828 EXHIBIT "B" DETAILED PLAN FOR COUNTRY CLUB PLACE, CONSISTING OF: 1. Detailed Site Plan (1 page) 2. Preliminary Plat of Country Club Place, Lot 2, Block A (1 page) 3. Landscape Plan and Plant List/Landscape Plan Legend (2 pages) 4. Planned Development Design Statement and Development Schedule, (2 pages) Z-1828 All I ~•Yr .w 0 *oo~ AIEA. tW TAMUTM1 O O O ~ Al-ft 09eK FETAL O A • At-A! •.ti 1 AWN :r d1-M O BI-" Q C ~ ~ / ~ q!-tt _ O rr tt0 Mrs aAnaFO F1eob ~ CA11t f O o 9-)C>O p 00 AC",K PAR" we CAN j t I&M AGM o course 1 r 000" 11! U/WAM O l 00 . «:i I. VAN am" ow I. ~ 1 L .-.1-ztix ~ 0 ad SMISAWROdow Noma ` i ..w....ollr.m.r 41LL Mw Mw r^" y ■ b»MMODFI OMIT At S 29 ++I PM AIWA O e~erTA RBCLSIVBD AUG 2 7 1986 R E TV - To. Lc. 0! AT -E D w•! A N I E L S U R V E Y A- 3 7 8 K _ ON LANE F-i M'mr F=( CL MI 1r ~ D~ I \ ,t r~ l l~j~ SItE ARE. E?o TV ~To + I `LOT l 4 I 11 f/ I LOCATION MAP I lh 1, 1 ~ y[lI I 18 / n 1 1 I I A t M ONIM V1' WMIA to xle~wr Txa A.N .Mpq f ~r 11I 1 rrllMr aNo UNI YO../Af ►0.11f O.R. I I m y pMMT o v AOnlq+ltl,Rt W4 j I l T, MART IN SURVEY A-900 LEA Mn M.M%11Rt~1 IIEr1S1014 MLf1rJIYIr Mt COUNTRY CLUB PLACE AorNk l0? L $LOCK A 1,7 OUMY MY OF O""K OWTOk 1UfA0 EMOLfI noo 0 Kim"" d soot sm lift MIT Krim mllr! ofaeluL few Ta01 IMAM AA - f1CALE DATE .10! 1rr~wrr r,. dtfQ I.EL ND. 1'-100' IVS/N 0601A6 a • I ~ ~ • III r _TM lFff Cab- Z . Plant List/Landeca a Plan Le end Shade or Ornamental Trees LO - Live Oak B Pear - Bradford Pear CE - Cedar Elm Shrubs or Ground Covers TYH - Yaupon Holly DYH - Duarf Yaupon Holly DBH - Duarf Barberry WAX - Waxleaf Ligustrum PHOT - Photinia LIR - Lirops 4 . ~yF.-IS:~.i¢-'F.a .a3 y.Y_. .v y. ...n ~N r.. 09 July 1986 86-0146.PD PUNNED DEVEtA~tlt T DESIGN ST' ~TOM i~Garne~ r Equity Search Realty, Inc. 1. Statement of rctect A. To develop a single family attached community, tennis and pool facilities as well as open space. Be Development and marketing to commence upon final plat approval. 2. Relation to Coawpreh r Plan The proposed district is in a low intensity zone according to the City of Denton Development Guide. This development has been designed to meet the intent of the Development Guide. 3. Ac~ross@ Acreage - 18.543 acres 4. LAa4 U s A. Existing land use - single house, agricultural, pasture - 18.543 acres Be Proposed land user single family attached - 18.543 acres 5. Off-Site Informat As shown on the Detailed Plan 6. Traffic and Trsnsportation As shown on the Detailed Plan A. Projected amount of traffics Total - 2200 V.T.D. 7, _Build~ inga_ A. Approximate locations As shown on the Detailed Plan B. Maximum heights 45-footo two-story C. Minimum building setbackss As shown on Concept Plan 30 feet along right-of-way 16 feet along property line D, Maximum total gross floor areas N.A. E. Number of dwelling units and units per acres 220 units - 11.9 d.u./acre 8, Res dlA tIgI Subdivis oas N,A, 9. Waster gad Drainage As shown on Preliminary Plat 10. Utilities, As shown on Preliminary Plat 11. Trees As shown on Detailed Plan. There are tree masses located on the property with Oaks 3 inches in diameter or greater, A majority can be saved with the land uses proposed. 124 Open SDaCa As shown on Detailed Plan - Minimum 30% 13. Sccr As shown on the Detailed Plan 14. D-mIgg Mat Shy A. Estimated start of constructions 1986 B. Development to occur upon final plat approval September 1986. Completion by",tune 1987. . ,71 t184L 1 ~,f . V r f 1 • A'`1 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZO GAP TEXAS, AS SANE WAS ADOPTED AS AN OF THE CITY OF DENTON • UADI&UACES OF THE CITY Of DENTON APPENDIX TO THE CODE 0~ AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID KAP TEAS BY ORDINANCE l10. 69.1 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER TO 27.2674 ACRES OF LANG MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBiw HL"il OP /'N• 1830 AND HOSSON LANE ' ZONING CLASSITICATIOIf FAON AGRICULTURAL mo TO PAOVIDE FOR A C HA E CLASSITID USt DESIGNATI011 TO P N DE" A" DISTAICTCSS IY C AMUNT ATION AMD USL DESIGWATION• PROVIDING 0~ PD40 D STRICT OF'1 000.00 FOR VIOLATIOtdS QTY IN A FOR AN EYFECTIVE DATL. THEREO/, AND PROVIDING i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAI;13t SECTI~ON . That the zoning classification following and use designation of the described property, to-wit: All that certain tract of land situated in the T. Martin S, from Abstract Npaber 900 in the City of Denton, Denton County urvey , Texas, and being part of the called 40 acre tract described in the dead Allen Madewell, at ux, 183 Page 127 of the Deed Recordsto J uof Denton Count recorded TSxas Value* I~ sub;ect tract being more particularly described as fellows: I BEGINNING for the southeast corner of the tract being described herein, at the northeast corner of the tract described in the dead from C. J. Sovell r to A, of , recorded in Volume 447, Page 311 of the said Word, treat, and being in the east line of the said said acre ract, 400 feet north from the southeast corner thereof; THENCE west with she north line of the said Word Tract a distance of 1292 feet to the northwest corner thereof in the east right-of-way line of F.,g. 1830; THENCE of 920 feed to is poi t sfor ornerg in Hobson Road; Rance THENCE east with Hobson Road a distance of 1292 fast to a point in the east line of the said 40 acre tract; THENCE south with the east Line of the 40 acre tract a distaao0 of 920 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 2742874 acres of lands is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use desigastion to Planned Development "PD" District Classi. fication and Use desljM Rion under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. 'CTION . for that uirio! as the issuance of say certificate of occupancy conditions shall bo building within the district, the following L That the areas destSeated for "duplex" use, as shown on the attached hed site plan, shall be developed and used is accardaaoe with f social disc icts* regulations applicable to two-family dwelling i 2, That the area designated for'" px" the attached site pine, shall be developed ins accoras on dancewwith except that theg minimum lot sizes shall be y 0000 square dfeeticts, r 3. That the area designated for " " on the attached site piano shall bin dovelo ped nand usedhoin se, as accordance with the toning regulations a districts, except that each main building lovable to lot zoning located so as to extend into one aide yard setbackc for each yloto so long as such side yard setbacks being used for adjoining lots are not abutting. 4. That the area designated for "townhouse" use, as shown on t he attached site plan. shall be developped in accordance with the except thaa t thregul air iaua lopplicabe to F-7 ning size shall be 2 700 squire districts, et sand the main buildings thereon shall be attached. S. That the area designated for the "multi-family" use, as shown on the attached site plan, shall be developed and used in accordance with the zoning regulations applicable to HF-1 toning districts. 6. That the development and use of the district shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan attached harstoo or any site plan hereafter approved for all or part of said district, and any conditions herein contained. 7. That no detached signs shall be permitted in the district. 5. That landscaping plans must be submitted for the area designated as "general retail" and "multi-family" on the attached site plan prior to anti ~.'avelopment of that area. 9. That constructed onsidewalks of * nn,.g soh straiity t adjacent atooor within the development. SfC`T„^IpH`~ II . A. That the City Council approves the comprehensive site Itriplexr" t townhouse,'d'ea and a"s ardenhoas"upuse,'+ as 'm shown f on lthe attached site plan, in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance. a. That prior to any development or construction within the area designated on the attached site plan for ganaral retail (01) use, a comprehensive site plan for such area shall be requireddfor approval of plannedcdevelopment thetricts.procedures C, That the approval of the district showing a general retail area on the attached site plan shall not be deemed approval of such designated area For any particular land use but shall be construed only to mean that uses allowed in general retail zoning districts on the date such comprehensiv4 site plan is submitted, may be considered as possi'u1e appropriate uses of such designated area at the time such plan is submitted therefore, the approval thereof to be determined upon consideration of such factors which say include, but not be limited to the followings the time alepaed from the effective date of this ordinance to the date such comprehensive mite laa is submitted for such area, the aumber of proposed builds, dwelling units. or proposed uses] ! arrsasemlat and deaida of the `r:aar utilities to be devilopmentnifstreets, Parking proposed re latureaj SECT • applied to such area. and the • N V The Zonias Map of 14th day of JCaurYr t 19690 City Of DAntan , Ordinances he Cit ► Texas 69-1, as amended Y of Dentoa I adix to adopted the the Code of such chan e r be and the aami i4x 4 under Ordinance No. and Usi amended to show above conditions Dand rspeciiications&tioa ~ SEC ION V subject to the That the Ci finds that suety Council of the plan for the h chants is in ce daarnce Texas, hereby City with n p other tic* thin a s ► purpose of of Denton Texas, and with romotin reasonable rasideration h e welfnre of the xmon Peculiar suitability or i ~or the chaeacter the district and for its coaservins the value of the r buildings, sea, and with a view to and eacbon# ins the most appropriate uses maximum baaelt Co the City f Protectias human lives Y o Denton, Tlxaa, and itland for citizlaa~ha HION V Any or ULU person who shall violate a therlot or Comply therewith or w~th vanion of Chia ordinance, be sullty c! a a ppermit or certificate lei +dt ththe ereunder, rlmints One Thousand miademeaaor unishable b shall deemed cellars (;1,000.00). Each by not exc!ldind Porttoa thereof durins such lne Person fh&ll guilty of a separate offense for each and ~vlr~yy day committed, or continued, be which any violation of and o r 7 day is violations such person shall sad upon conviction of an be punished within the 1',miany such above, • s I v , d That ays the date of ordinance its shall become effective fourteen (14) hereby fr directed to cause ehiascaSo a nod tLo the data of its tthe City Secretary is Published swine inPassasethe.Denton Keco tnis ordinanc! to be r Chronicle, newspaper of tae City of Denton, Texas the official lthia ten (LO) days of 1( w PASS$1! A►VD APP1i0VED this the day Of 19 OC ATTEST: CI Ol Di ON, TEXAS CITY OY OMTO00 01TS7CAs 1k APPAORD AS TO LSOAL r04f: CZ~ °I D"YOVITCH+ CITY ATTUMY INTOU, T&W BY: liw a M M N M M y N ~ ~v l • r•Iwr • .Iw.ew ,math i ~'+M/•{ Mull ~.K ~~~~KI•) ' Mob0 to.t 1 : i' I MIMfR aua...u., u!+• yra.. ~.1 .1..• y n DATE: IO/D7/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUDJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR z-1833 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at Its meeting of August 27, 1986 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1833, by a vote of 5-1. SUMMARY: This is a request for a change In zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planneE development (PD) district on a 51 acre tract locate& at the northeast corner of Kings Row and Loop 288. If approved, the planned development will permit single family detached (SF-7 and SP-10), general retail, end park lanJ uses. BACKGROUND: The proposal Is consistent with low intensity area policies with the exception of the retail concentration policy. The proposed 7.7 acres violates the 4 acre concentration policy listed In the Denton Development Guide. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Not appll:able. FISCAL IMPACT: There Is no Impact on the general fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Harrell Prepared by: City Manager nom, Denise Spidey Urban Planner J►ppr ed ;(l Jeff Mey Director of Planning and Development 0389e/l PLANNING AN7) ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case NO.: Z-1833 Meeting Date October 7, 1986 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: J. V. Strange Teasley Road Associates P. 0. Box 117 Denton, Texas 76202 Status of Applicant: Joint Venture Requested Action: Change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classification to permit the following 1:nd uses: 1) General Retail - 7.7 acres 2) Single Family - 31.5 acres, 7,000 minimum square foot lots 3) Public Park - 1.47 acres 4) Single Family - 9.78 acres, minimun, 1.0,000 square foot lots Location and Size: A 56.45 acre tract located at the northeast corner of the pr)posed Loop 288 extension and Kings Row. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential; outside City limits. South - Agricultural, vacant; outside city limits. East - Single family residential, mobile home park vacant; outside city limits. West - Single family residential; vacantt At SF-7. Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area. (Case Z-1833) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: The property has frontage on Kings Row, an unimproved collector,and Silver Dome Road. Perimeter street paving regulations will be applicable to Kings Row and Silver Dome Road. Sidewalks will be req uired along one side of all streets in the development. Utilities: Developer must extend the proposed water line from the existing line at Windsor Drive north along old North Road to and under Loop 288, then southeast to Kings Row, east along Kings Row and north along Freeman Drive to the north boundary of the project. Developer must extend 30" water line from Kings Row southeast along east right-of-way at Loop 288. An 18" sanitary sewer line must be extended from Windsor Drive north along Old North Road under Loop 288 and parallel to water line as noted above. An 18' sewer line will be extended from the existing 21" line to the east portion of this development. Electric and telephone service is available to the site. Drainage: A channel will be required along the western boundary of Section 1 and between Sections 2 and 4. The remainder of the property will drain to Kings Row and through culverts to Loop 288. 1 HISTORY On .rune 11, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of an earlier case at this location. The original submittal featured the following land uses: 11 General Retail - 3.8 acres 2) Multi-family - 240 units on 9.6 acres 31 Duplex - 3 acres 4) Single Family - mini),1m 7,000 square foot lots on 29.7 acres (Case Z-1833) P-mle Three HISTORY (Continued) 5) School - 9.9 acres 6) Public - 1.5 acres Strong neighborhood opposition to the multi-family land use was a significant factor in the denial of the case. ANALYSIS This property is located in a low intensity area. The Denton Development Guide designates these areas as the City's primary residential areas. The following is an analysis of this project by Development Guide policies: 1) Intensity - The area intensity standard will not be violated with approval of this proposal. 2) Office/Retail Concentration Policy - Office/Retail concentrations are limited to four (9) acres in size and these concentrations must be separated by one-half mile in distance. The 7.7 acre retail site )roposed violates this policy. This developer as well as another on the west side of Loop 288 are proposing general retail levels in excess of low intensity standards. Approval of both requests could lead to creation of a modei:ate node at the intersection of Kings Row and Loop 288. At a study session held on August 20, 1986, the Planninr,, and Zoning Commission voted to retain this area as a low intensity area. Approval of this retail tract would prohibit the development of additional retail land use in this area according to low intensity area policies. The following is an analysis of other planning issues involved in this proposal: 1) Buffering - At the time of original submittal, staff and neighbors voiced concerns over the issue of utilizing mir►imum 7,000 square foot lots to buffer adjacent Oak Bend Estates (16,000 square foot or larger lots). The new proposal features 9.78 acres of minimum 1U,000 square foot lots, a much more suitable buffer for the adjacent subdivision. A buffering issue of some concern in this case is the proposal to place the 7.7 acre retail tract adjacent to the single Gamily detached area in Section ::II. The developer is proposing a screening wall at the rear of the general retail tract to buffer the residential section from the retail development. 2) Location of Park/School Site - The 1.5 acre tract proposed for a public park is in itself too small to be utilized for ~~:.ase Z-1833).., f f Page Dour ANALYSIS (Continued) a park; however, the site is adjacent to a 9.9 acre elementary school site. This location fulfills the joint use of public facilities policy of the City of Denton and the Denton Independent School District. 3) Preservation of Trees - Approximately half of the land included in thi.a request is heavily wooded. Wooded areas such as these are part of Denton's c;tarm and add greatly to the quality of life in the city. The developer has provided a statement proposing to remove only those trees directly in roadways or those that cannot be saved during utility construction. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its meeting of August 27, 1986 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1833 despite the violation of the retail concentration standard by a vote of 5-1. The following were recommended conditions for development: 1) A detailed plan shall be submitted consistent with the concept plan, development schedule, and development standards attached. 2) Land uses permitted in the general retail area, Section 4, shall be all uses permitted in the general retail district In Section 7, Subsection H, retail and service type uses and the following additional uses permitted in the general retail district: amusement - commercial (indoor), theater - othcr than drive-in type, and new auto arts sales store, 3) Electric service for this developpment shall be underground. 4) A six (6) foot brick wall shall be placed along the northern boundary of the general retail tract before building permits may be issued on that parcel. 5) A minimum of 201 of the general retail tract trust be landscaped on the detailed plan for that parcel. 6) Sidewalks will be located on one side of all streets in the development. 7) Upon completion of the development phase, restrictions will be filed of record to prohibit removal of trees from developed lots without the permission of the Architectural Control Board. 8) Each residential lot must have a minimum of two (2) trees in the front yard and two (2) trees in the back yard of the home. - - - - (Ca sr Z-1833) Page Five ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHM ".1qS 1. Location Map 2. Proposed Concept Plan 3. Proposed Devolopment Standards 4. Previous Concept Plan S. Reply Form Totals 6. Property Owner List 7. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission ineeting of June 11, 1986 8. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of August 27, 1986 0188k . wogs cnun Rd: ~ z • ; . • ;3b O c \ t 1 • Sotto m.Circla W Rd. \r ' I A 1 , r . 1 • HARTLEE 4N 4 REA OF R _ EQUEST 1 p :I4a' Oak Bend Kf n9i now e~Rd 4 mom Try [to ' •r• V 4.5 380 3~T • Jr. FA P A 288 ~ C+ LE~i FIN i ~ I WrIAL)MM+ 1 I,rrw Mwl I n NMTN MYN WAY ~ /n I . ~ f ! eITY uMlf y • 1 ~1IMN~..wA.• r i NM M ",~(r LL ra~tvsr MAP ,s T MOT ` CD , w• ~ r~~,,,yy~ LX/sY/My TRIP! ' I~+ y~.Ir lw. Wn,rrw u.... .r~,rlrF" \ - a. . aim'' a YtMaKir ' \ i • QtI/14s NTIA~) Mllw rlw r,. / A)).Dr IlI , iRar r~L,r~1"a•' wl +T4fllr 410 I ~ W ±y. ~elirtl MIM I. ~~'•~i lt~i w ~ y~~ / 4 ~r• wlA rr •iw4. MM1.' wew kill, SCALe I'•Zoo C sun+.rLj ! Ya+•''!:"ti:....,• 8~_J If N M' y ~.("A.)'l.G. 6 ~~bmbm&ANWAR Ill/A 7 ~.N I'IIM NN.. t ' i~' f Q ju'~_ irfrrw twe.Ni~i...M `y/ ~ .c 40 MIN: 1~ 1!^ l Syr ~ ~ I 'M 1,11/. ~•b •I IN! Mr 1. ail Rl. f~fMM WY. 1nwII l~w.nW..llti. 11. Y. y81y • .K A ;Ir..r r I~[.~.~Y.IIr tMNM Mw riq. . W ~a~ W irI.N.M 1 ~.~1.... ..1... M l u+Vl ta.pl nw •'Ah• 1RIW M.I.I~RI J,~ ti; tt~~ n / w " 4'Mt►I. T err . ON or ~ QA ' ~ f ~ ~ ~wIA+YGI wra arnrea own C^f~e ~ r, a/r tw= r na IYI.t iLU+. lrLl. 111 H OM,M YYI LM Nth fil Y'I .NI'%ON ty11. . TCASLEY FWD AOO&IATCy, C /e MR -AV, $TRM11! Wx Nf CONT6141, TVAO 'utOC • >;rv,rr rnc~A{. RI(Crel,Vf/Aa. , I , aeY ~ Iae4, ~ I ~ ' DAN~sp'btde G~E~>JP~~LD wooDS BURKE ENGlNEERWG y ~~allloail . 'lK . IT. I'T ! 60"W66F T PLAIJ fteme7igw 13 A-0 P& n. . 4p i. LOCUYI'+ MNT[ 1~ , DEIROM, TWS 7r OI JIM 11" $714 I /Nf' t Teasley Road Associates P OL Box 117 Denton. Texas 78202 (817) 383.1620 August 14, 1986 GRELNPIELD WOODS ADDITION Planned Development Tree Conservation Approximately fifty per cent (508) of the land area at Greenfield Wood is covered by native trees of varying heights and caliper. It is the intent of the developer to remove only those trees directly in roadways (paved portion only) or those that cannot be saved during utility construction. Every effort will be made to coordinate construction of streets and utilities in order to save as many trees as possible. . Upon completion of development phase, restrictions will be filed of record to prohibit removal of trees from developed lots without the permission of the developers' Architectural Control Committee. A standing restriction will also require that each lot have a minimum of two (2) trees in each the front and back yard of the home. As in the past, the developer will relocate as many trees as possible during the development process. Our goal is to preserve trees, not to destroy them. GREENFIELD WOODS CONCEPT PLAN VISION GENERAL NOTES: 1. Statownt o Intent It is intended that this 50.45 acres, be zoned and annexed within the City limits of the City of Denton; and be subdivided as requested on accompaning Concept Plan above. Teasley Road Associates being the sole owners of the property, wish to designate a portion of sforfteattoaed abbdivision:tor a PUBLIC PARK. 2. Relation to Comprehensive Plan Be it known that this development is intended to meet or exceed the City of Denton requirements in direct relation to the City's comprehensive plan for this area of Denton, specifically the areas being designated for Educ- ation, Public Usage, and Preservation of Existing Natural Landscape and Foliage whenever possible. 3. Acreage: Total acreage- 51.07 Ac. gross Area Summary: Gross Area: 51,07 Street ROW: 2.13 T,P,&L. Esmtj 1.60 NET ACREAGES 47.34 4. Land Uses Density General Retail 7.7 Ac. 40% E.A.R. 3.08 Ac. SF7 31.5 Ac. 4.4 U/Ac. 112 lots S.F10 9.78 Ac. 3.4 U/AC. 27 lots Public Park 1,47 Ac. 50.45 Ac. 5. Off Site Information All adjacent property lies outside of Denton City Limits Zoned "A" except proposed Loop 288. 6. Traffic and Transportation Projected Traffic Amounts Trip Generation Acreage Level Avg. Trips Total Land Use Factor of Development Acre Trips Single Family SF-7 10 trips/D.U. 4.4 D.U./Ad, 44 1386 trips Single Family SF-10 10 trips/D.U. 3.4 D.U./Ac. 34 354 trips General Retail 60 trips/D.U. 17,424 sq. ft./Ac. 1.ni,5 8047 trips Public Park 10 trips/Ac. 1.5 Ac. 15 15 trine Total trips daily 9787 7. Buildings as See Concept Plan "Example" bb~ Maximum height- 2 story (cc) Setbacks- see Concept Plan above. (dd) non-residential total floor areas not to exceed 40% of 7.90 Ac.• 3.16Ac. continued- RBCBT1►Ril n►i^, 9 R 7004 e 711 GRFENFIMD WIOOI)S CONCEPT PLAN A.A&VISION GENERAL NOTES: (page 2) 8. Residential Subdivision (aa) 142 lots, for location see Concept Plan above (bb) see Concept Plan "Example" (cc) setbacks- see Concept Plan "Example" 9. Water and Drainage Site is out of 100 year flood plain. There are no ponds, creeks, or lakes. 10. Utilities Texas Power and Light Easement- see Concept Plan above. No existing gas lines on site. Proposed utilities: have been submitted 2-6-86 11. Ttpe„ s See Concept Plan above for limit of existing trees. 12. Open Space See Concept Plan above. 13. Screening Natural screening to be used wherever possible with berms and fences to be added between areas of different land use and adjacent property. 14. Development Schedule Section Detailed Plan Construction 1 Jan. 1987 ` Aug. 1988 2 Sept. 1988 Oct. 1989 3&4 July 1989 Aug. 1990 15. Minimum lot areas are 7000 sq. ft. for SF-7 and 10,000 sq. ft. for SF-10. 16, Proposed Sanitary and Water Lines are shown end will be sized and designed according to current subdivision ordinance requirements. e wo(eK wr ~rroicl i 1'~", I 1 (w n) All ft, MAP A& I.wZMTMIf"L ow ^ks 2-W.0~~r- &."I N Z~lK+M/ I'•~DO'~ SCALE At~w Nn a ~ IY~ +11 ~ MII I' L r V •MW Tf1[Wt &W aglAlo A of. J '640 OW \ OREEWIEwa WWs er, ZdIMNtt OMME EXHW j I _._~~iw Y•w=Y~YI'~~.rWYww ~wMwrl.. I yMNI1~W~w•'•wY V.1..11K...r1 ~.r. lr.~..~.~.__~ ~ Iw. •i !af ~ wl, rw.wrr rl~w~l~w•~~- .rw +.~.r ON'K~: ttAXtl' IIQIO A~lOp11[~ ~'`~~M~~~'w'`}Y y.., MI.M •.IY r. I. Wr.bM wWr 1•V 20L b, aw~t i'wwMM Yi 'uw li •a - CLMww~_r__i[.~,.,., r~~ Y 1~ .~rrw n.. lwl w.rrr... ww.lrw..w4w. FW w ~ MU IIM. • ~ ` t`Y wwlw l.'1• w "Ir ■i WIL w INi •••wl iii}.,.ra W W r.wr1Y 1. Y N I.I'Y w ~ w nM••ri "tr !-1t•µ AMA" Y'e'ti ...Y WYI 1~' Iw Ila Y wY.. II.Y ~'w~ • Il~r w rlb, i • K IIIIr YIII~ ~ w.q+w 1Y.•1 wommu~ W . 11 r .r ~11M ^"1 VZ ( M 1N w. ~lti1Y ~NM OIML ~IMr• I „w,,,, ~ r+! rwr~i+Mwrw s r . - ~,•r/"'K ,a,~ ~,r anti PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL 2-1.833 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received s i r r OfAlAoa 4~ AA e. la 7,6 76 ALA- S 177 r. -136 NAWAM Planning and iynutes 8 oning Commission June 11, IV86 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was heed on Wednesday, June 11, 1986, at 5:00 p,m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building. Present: Euline Brock, Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr., Judd Holt, Gary Juren and Tom Pearson Absent: None Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey, Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; David Ham, Assistant Director of Utilities, Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Susan Mitchell, Secretary 1. MINUTES: it was moved b) Mr. Juren, seconded by Ms. Cole and unan mously carried (7-0) to approve the minutes of the special called meeting of May 27, 198b. 11, CUNSENT AGENDA: it was moved by Mr. Escue,, seconded by Rs, o e an unanimously carried (7-0) to approve the consent agenda as follows: A. Approval of final plat of the D1SD-Farris Road Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. B. Approval of final plat of the Londonderry Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. C. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of Northwood Addition, 12th Installment, D. Approval of final plat of the South Denton Industrial Park Addition, Lot 10 Block 1. 11I, PUBLIC HEARIIIGS A. 3-16S. Petition of Harold HoIigan requesting an amend- men to Specific Use Permit No. 165, The property is a 39.3 acre tract in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330 and located at the southeast corner of Mayhill Road and Wards Road. rha current toning permitted the devel- opment of an existing 225 unit mobile home park. If ap- proved, the amendment will permit the development of an additional 25 mobile home lots, Mr. Escue made the motion to move S-)65 to the last item on the Public Hearings because the petitioner's repre- sentative wanted to be there to request that their case be withdrawn. Seconded by Mr. Pearson and unanimously carried (7-0). B. Z-1803. Petition of Telsley _Ad Associates requesting s am age in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) classification on a 61,3 acre tract at the northeast corner of the prorosed Loop 288 extension and Kings [low. The property is more particularly described as a tract in the James Coltort Survey, Abstract 288, and the Dwnie1 P. Cut,pp Surrey, Abstract if?. Ii the request is approved, the oianned devolopmerst will pare;lt the folloying land usesi General Retail - 3.8 acres Multi-Family - 9.6 acres, 140 total units School - 9.9 acres Public Park - 1.S acres Sinfle F "ilr - 19.7 Kcres, 70000 square toot O ftio : lots P $ Z ;Minutes June 11, 1986 Page 2 Six notices were mailed to propert ors withi 200 feet; two reply forms were received innfavors nonreply forms were received in opposltion. PETITIONER: Virgil Strange, representing Teasley koad their site, stated the school site, dfrom Windsor tand ' Old North Road. He salmi that they will us providing the annexation, platting, and zoning for the DISD school site. He said that the 1.5 acre park site is contiguous to the DISD tract at their request and this conforms to the City and school standards for joint use. He said that the DISD has commenced work on the property and hopes to occuppy the school by 1987. He said that they have an interest In the preservation of trees and will leave as many trees as pos- sible as well as replanting trees as necessary. He said that Kings Row will be the only m4) or intersection between Sherman Drive and Highway 380 on Loop 248. He said that n eedrforySFf7handimulti f ypamilyeinbthehnorttheastasection aof Denton. standardsHwithitrhe that this exception is of the quality totalrupitslinhthemeets multi-family section. IN FAVOR: None present. CPPUSED: James McDaniel, 233 Salado Drive, stated that he roars his area will become an asphalt and concrete-jungle with the destruction of the trees and construction of • apartments. He said that this rezoning will devalue the homes in the area and cause heavy traffic problems. Jim Gray, 2412 Salado Drive, stated that he thought Virgil Strange a good builder. He said that he had no problem with lot size and homes. He said that his obloction is to the duplexes and the apartments. He asked for the acreage currently zoned for apartments, Ms. Carson stated that the c,)uld not answer that question at this time. Mr. Gray stated that he would like the information in the future. He said that he was of the opinion that there is enough acreage In the City of Denton zoned for apartmerat use. He added that he didn't think that this area needed to be zoned for more apartments. He said if a neighborhood of SF-7 or larger is built in this area, he would have no obj.,etion. He asked for the occupancy rate of :partmemcs. Mr. Strange said 91-4St. Mr. Gray said that he believed it would ue more like 60-70t maximum. Mr. Pearson said that 90.911 for all apartments is correct, Mr, Gray stated that he expected His house to still be in good shape in 20 years and he believed that an apartment house would be run down by that time. He added that he knew of several examples of duplexes that are vacant or not taken care of by their owners, He asked for those in opposition to stand. Approximately 70 people stood up. Mr. Claiborne asked for the kind of land development he envisioned around the Loop, Mr. Gray statsO that he under- Mood there will be commercial, general retail, and multi- family. No added that they did not want the multi-far:ly at this particular intersect,ron. P 6 Z Minutes June Ill 1986 page ~ • Mr. Pearson asked if he understood that Kings xow will Increase in volume after the Loop comes In whether or not Mr. Strange develops. Mr. bray said yes. Beverly Strong, 1540 Quail Ridge Drive, stated that she lives approximately 400-450 feet from area of pi) that is proposed for apartments. She said that the people in this area share three things, 1) they pay taxes, 4) they voce, 3) and they are opposed to having 140 apartments being built in their backyards. She said that their concerns are: 1) devaluation of property with the duplexes and apartments, 2) traffic flow, 3) the possible land uses on 230 acres owned by EDS if this proposal is allowed, and 4) the investment return if they wanted to sell in the future. She added that they did not want the apartments and asked the Commission to consider their wishes in making a recommendation. Mr. Pearson stated that the apartments typically carry a larger tax burden than the single family homes. Ms. Strong stated that she preferred to pay higher taxes and write tnem off and be able to get liar investment back. Lyn Johnson, resident and president of Uak Bend Home- Owners Association, stated that they lied three stong reasons in objection to the zoning: 1) area adjacent to elementary school, 2) setting a precedent for zoning outside of. Loop 188, and 3) tree preservation. He said that they had four major problems with the proposal: 1) entire area is too dense, 2) traffic flow, 3) no tree preservation lxan in either staff or developer's plan, and 0 4) the 1.5 acre park is ;oo small. He said that their solutions are: 1) add larger lots, 1) changing the apart- ments to duplexes or four-plexes, and 3) a strong tree preservation statement. He added if these changes were made, they would be more apt to support the request. Bob Sikes, 29 Oak Bend, stated that during the annexation process he voiced his concern to the Council for the trees. He said that northeast Denton is quality home life and should he maintained, He said that they realize develop- ment will come but that their concern was the way in which it develops. He said that he supports the president of the homeowners' association in that this area should be singlm family not multi-family, John Eddy, 1320 Heather Lane, stated that he is against the multi-family dwellings and that studies show these areas breed crime, problems, and traffic congestion. He said that he Is tined of development destroying trees and disrupting their quality of life with construction. He added that no hoped this Commission and the city council would honor the quality of life, dyed Williams, 2401 Salado Drive, stated that kings Row is not in a bond issue. He said that Kings kow will cross Loop 288 and will be controlled by stop signs. He added that Kings Row is in bad shape and does not need the extra traffic. He said that he was in objection to the proposal as a whole. . Carl Mahnberg, 2518 Quail Ridge Drive, stated that he would feel really chested if an apartment complex goes in within 3uo feet of his newly built home. He said that he checked with several departments about this, arot! and got no indica- tion of multi-family in this area. Charles Saunders 2537 Quail Rid to Drivo, stated that the traffic flow will lacrosse with he Loop and will increase even more with the multi-family. He .tared that Dallas v $ Z Minutes June it, 19b6 Page 4 has single family along major roads and it is developed in a nice way, he said that his primary objectior, is to the multi-family. Ed Pearce, 27 Oak Bend, stated that he was asking for pro- tection of his investment. He added that he is against the zoning because of the uses proposed on the northernmost boundary. J. B. Sppalding, 16 Oak Bend, stated that th's area needs to continue with larger single family homes. Marsha Williams, 1545 quail Ridge Drive, stated that her objection is to the multi-family and that there is a lot of the Loop left to put multi-family that doesn't abut an existing residential neighborhood. STAFF REPORT, Ms. Spivey stated that this property is to- betvioolatediaithnapprovalarea tnls proposal. Sha saidnthat the 3.8 acre retail site proposed meets the office/retail concentration policy. She said that this proposal features two hundred and forty (240) units and the density on this tract should be reduced to comply with the multi-family concentration policy. She said a tnree acro duplex tract is used to buffer the multi-family area from the single family (SF-7) area. 'rho duplex section also provides housing diversity in the area which is encouraged by the Denton Development Guide. 'rho 1.5 acre tract proposed for a public park is in itself too small to be utilized for a park; however, the site is adjacent to a 9.4 acre elomen- Lary school site. This location fulfills the joint use of public facilities policy of the City of Denton and the Denton Independent School District She added that the planned development ordinance specifies that the developer provide a statement of impact of trees in existing develop' went. She said that the c,ommisston could require a tree survey. She said that staff recommends Approval of 2-1803 in that this proposal complies with Development Guide poli- cies for low intensityy areas. She added that conditions are also recommended by staff. Ms. Brock asked how a tree requirement would work when tho single family lots are sold off to Individuals. Ms. Spivey stated that each section of the planned development would require the approval of a detailed plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and 6 condition could be imposed at the time of detailed plan approval for tree presorvation. Ms. Brock asked if the Oak Bend area is in the city limits. Ms. Spivey said no. Mr. Pearson asked how lot size is determined. Ms. Spivey stated that staff proposed some larger lots but the peti- tioner elected not to do so. She said that it was staff's feeling that policies were being complied with except for the multi-family. She said that the size of the lots can be controlled but not the size if the house. She said that there can be quality housing on SF-7 lots but larger lots would be nicer. Mr. Pearson asked about intersections on the Loop. Ms. Spivey stated that there Are no other intersections exceppt for Sherman King Row, and highway 380 with the post bility of Windsor ive. Mr. Pearson asked about other arms along the Loop that will need access, Mr. Clark stated that tney would nave to get approval from the Highway Department. He said that the state would not allow them to have direct access and staff would not encourage direct access. P 8 G ,inures June 11, 1986 Page 5 REBUTTAL: Mr, Strange stated that they were quality type Mai~op addressingdtheirnconcerns.toHecsaidgthattthey have by contract sold the land'to the school district but they will only receive funds as they do various stages of ttherecwlllr be e traffic regardless of f as he deup veiGpient. He sa.! that they have a retail section at the intersection :nd the multi-family sits in back of the retail. He said that there are trees that block the two story multi-family project and give peopple an -)pportunity for peace, quiet and quality of life in northeast Denton in a multi-family area. He said that the SP-7 lots will be ouffered from the Oak Bend area by trees and only 10 lots will back up to the Oak Bend are:,, He said that these to lots are not visible to the Oak Jend area, He said that these SF-7 units will be deed restricted to no less than lboo s uare feet. He said that he has met with the neighbors and attempted to compromise with them. He said at this time there is no market for larger lots, He said that they intend to build a quality development around the school and added that tney do not create slums. He said with this development they are preserving trees and quality of life. He said that the development provides dive+rsity of housing and meets the Development Guide policies. Mr. Holt stated that he shared the concern for the trees with the people present, lie said that the developer should build the large lots in the area with the trees and the smaller lots in the area without the trees. Mr, Strange stated that if there was a market for that type of development he would certainly do so. Chair declared public hearing closed. uSCISIOMo Mr. Claiborne stated that the residents close to e roposed multi-family had a valid argument and the residents in the Oak Bend area had a good argument in regards to the SF-7. Mr. Holt said that there is no quest,on that if there is a need for apartments that they should be built. He said that the two new schools that are proposed to be built in Denton will be filled immediately without any kind of de- velopment. He said that Evers school had a 401 turnover and the reason is because of the apartments. He said that he had no objection to SP-7 but that this is not the place for SP-7. He said that his objection is with the apart- monts and their effect on the school syitan and the density, Ms. Brock stated that she wished she knew who would ulti- mately develop the property. She said that she would like to see tree preservation and larger lots because the Oak Bend area needs to be preserved. She said that she doesn't think this is the place for apartments. Mr. Juren moved to recommend denial of 1603, Seconded by Ms Cole and unanimously carried (7-U). C. Z-1809. Petition of Ed Green and kick Moore requesting a change in zonin from the agricultural (A) district to the two family (21) classification on a 7.366 acre tract located on the south side of fast Mclianey Street (Pit 416) ertypismmorerpalp200 foot rticularlyedescribedoasoa tract In therE N, P i z Minutes August 27, 1986 Page 12 • U, Z ag33, Petition of J.Y. Stange, representing Teasley Roa 78soclatgqs requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural `Aj district to the planned development (PD) ^ r. 7' classification and approval of a concept plan on a 50.4 R acre tract located at the northeast corner of Kings Row and Loop 288 (currently under construction). The property is further described as a tract In the J. Coltart Survey, Abstract 188, and the D. Culp Survey, Abstract 287. If approved, the planned development will permit the following land uses: Single Family Getashed - 9.78 acres 27 units on minlaum 10,000 square foot lots with a density o1 3,4 units per acre Single Family Detac'ied - 31,5 acres 112 units on minimum 7000 square foot lots with a densityy of 4,4 units P9r acre General Retail - 7.7 acres Park - 1.47 acres Six notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposition, PETITIONER: Virgil Strange, Teasley Road Associates, said tthaatune it a petition for a planned development on the same property was denied for two reasons: 1) 9.8 acres of multi-family near the Intersection of Kings Row and Loop 288 and 2) lot sizes near Oak Bend Estates. Frank Clements, land planner for Johnson, Johnson and Roy, stated that the plan was designed to meet the road system shown on the City of Denton tgoroughfare plan. He said that this first phase would ue a neighborhood unit with park, school, general retail and residential areas. Greg Raven, retail consultant for Henry S. Miller, stated that they feel there Is a noed for neighborhood retail ser- vice center between Hichway 380 and Sherman Drive. He said that at the Intersection of Kings Row and Loop 288 the northeast corner is an ideal corner for retail and that the retail should be limited to this corner. He said that It is a ggeneral rule that for every 1,000 per- sons there should be one acre of retail. He said that the owner is askink for 7.7 acres of retail and the tract would not down to S acres after the landscaping and right- of-way requirements are met. Mr, Strange stated that there are 27 lots of SF-10 that border Oak Bend Estates that will have a minimum of 1,800 square feet of living area, He said that there are 112 lots of SF-7 that will have a minimum of 1,300 to 1,400 square feet of living area. He said that these homes are not starter homes but high quality and a good transition to adjacent land uses. He said that the plan includes a 1L47 the@generalrretaildareahish7.7 acressthat Includes the road right-of-way and 201 landscaping and the general retail area will net down to approximately 5 acres of de- velopable land. He said they have worked with the noigh- borhood and addressed their concerns, He said that have relocated the multi-family to another phase, have put SF-10 abutting the Oak Bend Estate area have a tree ppres- ervation statement, and have provided &Aequate buffgring and landscaping for each section. He said that utli.i?ies have been designed or are under construction and construc- tion will be completed before the school sits is finished in 1987. P rF Z Minutes August 27, 1986 Page W Mr. Claiborne asked. if he had conaidered'mixing office use in the general retail area, Mr. Strange stated that there is really not enough pace but would certainly not object to office space. He said that there is general retail backing up against the SF-7 but the the home buyer will know this before buying. Mr, Ellison asked Mr. Morris if tho Commission could consider an office use on a concept plan. Mr. Morris stated that he saw no problem. Mr. Strange added that they designed their own thoroughfare system to carry thu people to the general retail site, Ms, Brock asked If the 1,800 square feet is legally bins: ing on the SF-10 lots. Mr. Strange stated that he would be filing subdivision restrictions. Ms. Brock asked if they would be legally binding to other builders. W Strange said yes and that an architectural control board with three members including him would be created. IN FAVOR: Tom Pearson, former member of the Commission, stated that when he was on the Commission, he said that he would support the plan if the lots adjacent t-) Oak Bend Estates were changed to SF-10 lots. He said that there has been a lot of comments about the commercial/general retail area and how it is not wanted in this area. He said that the Loop will be a man made barrier to Kli,gston Trace. He said that there is an economic need for general retail here and it provides convenience. He stated that in regarJs to the multi-f„oily in the next phase that it Js simp,y good planning u distribute multi-family around his research indicatedithatrinJtherDecember ofa1985tand January of 1986 occupancy rates were 90-911. He stated that Mr. Strange is concerned about the City of Denton, saving trees and doing a good job, Beverly Strong, 2530 Quail Ridge Drive, stated that she Is in support of Greenfield Words, Ste stated that she feels that Mr. Strange has worked with the neighborhood and taken their concerns into consideration. She said that he has gone over and above the requests of the neighborhood. She said that the general retail area is a little over the concentration but that they are faced with the fact that retail Is going to -ume and feel this is the appropriate place. J. B. Spalding, Oak Bend Estates, stated that he was Jm- pressed with the transportation study as well as the marketing study. He stated that he felt this Is a good plan and that it merits consideration, Fred Williams, 2401 Salado, stated that he is In sup- port of this proposal and is also xiiling to work with Mr. Curry on hJs project. Marlene Gray, Salado, stated that her family is In favor and that Mr. Strange has worked diligently with the home- owners, She said that she finds it comforting to know since she is a realtor that the buyers will know before- hand that there J: retail next to the house they are go- ing to buy. She stated that she Is willing to work with Mr. Curry but that she does not feel general retail Is needed inside the Loop. She said that she would like to see general retail at the intersection as pruposed In this plan. She asked the Commission to approve the plan as proposed. s P b Z Minutes August 17, 1986 Page 14 Mr. Claiborne asked about office use inside the Loop, Ms. Gray stated that she would not support office use inside the Loop because of the lighting and traffic that would take away from the qua.lJty of life that exists. She stated that she would prefer single family inside the Loop. Roger Williams, 2545 Quail Ridge Drive, stated that their • property directly faces the Qeneral retail tract. He said that his family has decJded fo support the development because of the developer and they feel the area will be developed and managed properly. uPPOSED: Lynn Johnson, Uak Bend Estates, stated that he recogn zed that Virgil Strange has taken many of the step* suggested such as the SP-10 adjacent to the Oak Bend Estates area, tree preservation plan, deed restrictions, and removal of the multi-family and duplex. He said that they are still concerned about the general retail area because it may not be the only general retail tract at this intersection. Gary Dunsmore, Oak Bend Estates, stated that development In the area around tho Loop is inevitable He !said that the most important considerations for their move to Oak Bend Estates was the large lots, trees and the semi-rural environment and ha would like to see the characrer Main- tained. He said that he would like the SF-7 ro be SP-10, He said that the area of Highway 380 north to Sherman Drive is a prize for any developer. He asked the Commis- sJon to take into consideration the future of this area and what effect and impact it will have on northeast Denton. 'gay Legpacan, S I verdome Road, stated tha he moved be- cause he liked the rural environment. He stated that he has a concern with the SP-7 and fools this type of housing will decrease the value on his property. Gabe Zanbram, 2553 Quail Ridge Drive, stated that the Commission should keep this area low intena" y and avoid setting a precedent. He stated that he a ir t agree that aultl-family is needed all over the city .,cause people buy homes to get away from the multJ-family. He said that he agreed the ovetall plan is good but felt that general retail should be closer to a main artery and that he didn't want to look at retail from his window. S located TAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that this property is standardd wi111notibeeviolatedPwithdapthe provalaofnthlsipro- posal. She said that the 7.7 acre retail site proposed saidathattapprovaleofdthisaretailetractiwou policy. She ethe development of additional retail land use In this area according to low intensity area policies. She said that this new proposal features 9.78 acres of minimum 10 000 square foot lots, a much more suitable buffer for tie adjacent subdivision. She said that the developer is proposing a screening wall at the rear of the general retail tract to buffer the .•vsIdontI:l section from the retail development. She said that the 1.5 acre tract proposed for a public park is in Itself too small to be utilized for a park; however, the site Is adjacent to a 9.9 acre school site and this location fulfills the effort for joint use of public facilities. She said that the de- veloper has provided a statement proposing to remove only those trees directly In roadways or ,hose that cannot be saved during utility construction. She said that although this plan is an improvement over the previous submittal in terms of buffering of adjacent properties, staff cannot rr,~ P 4 Z Minutes August 27, 1986 Page 15 recommend approval of Z-1833 due to the violation of the non-residential concentration policy in a low Intensity area, She said that if the Planning and Zoning Commission is Inclined to approve, staff recommends conditions. Ms. Brock asked if the staff lees any problems in the maintenance of the park site. Ms. Spivey stated that the Parks and Recreation Department Indicated to the staff that there would not be any problems. No, Brock asked how binding is the tree conservation • statement. Ms. Spivey stated that it would be binding If attached to the ordinance approved by the City Council. Ms. Brock asked 1,: the condition of the screening device could be changed to a brick will behind the general retail. Ms. Spivey stated that staff has no objection. REBUTTAL: Mr. Strange thanked those who spoke in favor or opFo_M-Ton and stated that he has worked with them. He stated that he has addressed the buffering of the single family and if the general. retail is confined most people do not oppose to it. He said that regardless of what happens in this area the re!idents will still have to look at the Loop. He said that concentration of retail on one corner of this intersection is good planning instead of fragmenting general retail along the Loop. He said that they will be building box culverts under Kings Row and the state has already built box culverts under Loop 288, He said that they had no objections to any of the suggestions and will coo promise with the staff, He s+,ated that he didn't feel ?he market was feasible for all SP-10 lots, Mr. Claiborne asked if ZO-2St of this general retail tract 1s restricted to office use would It be arceptable. Mr. Strange said yes. Chair declared the public hearing closed. DECISION: Ms. Brock stated that she did not feel that if tt s tract is restricted to office use that It would deal with the+ violation of the policy of the Development Guide. Mr, Claiborne stated that he agreed but that on the other hand looking at the particular developa.tnt he was inclined to see retail and office abutting a SP-7 area Instead of a single family detached area. Ms. 3rock stated that she wondered if this restriction would serve any real purpose. Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of 2-1833 with the following conditions: 1. A detailed plan shall be submitted consistent with the concept plan, development schedule, and development standards. 2. Land uses permitted in he Seneral retail area, Section 40 shall be all uses permitted In the general retail district in Section 7, Subsection H, retail and service type uses and the following additional uses permitted in the general retail district: smitsement - commercial (indoor), theater - other than drive-in type, and raw auto parts sates store. 3. Electric service for phis development shall be underground with the exception of major transmission lines. 4. A six (6) foot screening aevace shall be placed along the northern boundary of the general retail tract before building termite may be Issued on that parcel. dot L P # Z Minutes August 27, 19F.6 Page 16 S. A minimum of 20t of the general retail tract must be landscaped on the detailed plan for that parcel. 6. Sidewalks will be located on one side of all streets In the development. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Claiborne stated that he would like to amend the motion in that the land use in the general retail area would be 751 retail land use and 251 office land use. Ms, Spivey asked if he was talking about floor area. Mr. Claiborne stated that he was talking about total gross acreage, Mr. MorrJs stated that general retail permits office use. Mr, Claiborne stated that he would like the tract restricted so that 251 of the tract will bo office. Motion dies for lack of a second, Ms, Brock stated that she would like to amend the motion to include the tree conservation standards, She added that the condition of the six foot screening device be changed to a six foot brick wall. Seconded by Ms. Cole. Vote was called on the amendment and motion unanimously carried (6-U). Vote was called on original motion and motion carried Mr. Hscue voted no. E. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL RBPLAT Of THE H.VV.HENNON 00T4l'UW, "Lo t s-T-anaT-- STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this property is located s scent and east of North Locust approximately 100-120 feet south of Sherman Drive, He said that the property is zoned general retail (GA) and the intent of the replat is to add a 10 foot strip to the south property line of Lot 3 that was sold off of Lot 2 by metes and bounds. He said that plans for ingress-egress for these properties Is a major concern and the DevelopMont Review committee will use every efr"ort to Insure joint access prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy and building permit for redevelopment of the residence and the old Piggly Wiggly building. He added that the Developia~nt Review Committee recommends approval, IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: Nona present. Chair declared the public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. E:scue moved to recommend approval of the pre nary and final replats of the H. V. Hennon Subdivision, Lots 2 and 3. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0). F. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL RBPLAT OF THE WOODED ACRES S~JHD'.V LOT Zp rIOCK 4o STAFF REPORT: Mr. Ellison stated that this site is ' oca a etwson Dallas Drive, Alegre Vista Drive and Sombre Vista Drive. He said that commercial (C) zoning is in place and the purpose of the replat is to separste Lots 2RA and 2RD, No said that Kelly-Moore Paint store is s 1588E ~`/,,.P NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, ' TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 50,5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KINGS ROW AND LOOP 288, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFI- CATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAIN SECTION 1. That the zoning classification and use designation of 50.5 acres of real property, described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated heroin by reference, is hereby changed from Agricultural A District Classification and Use designa- tion to Planned Development 'BPD" District Classification and Use designation under the comprnhonsive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION 11. That the "concept plan", attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and Incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved as the concept plan for the district herein established, in accordance with the provisions of article 11 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II1, That the district herein approved shall be subject to the following conditions, restrictions, and limitations: 1. Land uses permitted in the general retail area, Section 4 shall be all uses permitted in the general retail district in Section 70 Subsection H, retail and service type uses and the following additional uses permitted in the general retail district: amusement - commercial (indoor), theater - other than drive-in type, and new auto parts sales store., 2. Electric service for this development shall be under- ground with the exception of major transmission lines, 3. A six (61) foot brick wall shall be placed along the northern boundary of the general retail tract before building permits may be Issued on that parcel, 4. A minimum of twenty (20%) percent of the general retail tract must be landscaped on the detail plan for that parcel, 5. Sidewalks will be located on one side of all streets in the development. 6. Upon completion of the development phase, restrictions will be filed of record to prohibit removal of trees from Z-1833/PAGE I developed lots without the permission of the Architectural Control Board. 7. Each residential lot must have a minimum of two (2) trees in the front yard and two (2) trees in the back yard of the home. SECTION IV, The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 19690 as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No, 69-1, as amended, is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications, SECTION V. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view '.o conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human liv:rs, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION VI, That this ordinance shall becomc effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY ST7FMPM-,-WT7Mr- CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CRAREOTTV CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA ADA141 DRAYOVITCii, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYt_~A`y]L~ Z-1833/PAGE 2 7,r:A~xbibit "A., Field Notes to 50.0 acres (more or less) for Greenfield Woods zoning; Field notes to all that certain tract of land situated in the James Coltart Survey Abstract Number 288, Denton County, Texas and being a part of the called 60,9975 acre tract described in the deed from Dora Lee Reese to Teasley Road Association recorded in Volume 1541 Page 167 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the subject tract being more particularly described as !:ollownt BEGINNING FOR THE Northwest corner of the tract being described herein at an iron rod at the most Northerly Northwest corner of the said 60,9975 acre tract, said point also being the Southwest corner of Block A, Oak Bend Estates Addi- tion THENCE North 89 degrees 17 minutes East with the South line of said Oak Bend Estates 766.00 feet to a point for corr.er; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 34 seconds East 208,60 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 33 minutes 05 seconds East 417.00 feet to a point for corner in Farris Road; THENCE South with the East line of the said tract in Farris Road 150.00 feet to a point for corner at the Northeast corner of a called 9,963 acre tract known as the Denton Independent School District tract; THENCE South:',89':da8r6er?.$O,:'ItnutAsnA:lsepohds Westr4ithothe1.Nftthv1ine ofr.the said D.I.S.D. tract 460.00 feet to a point at they beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 300,00 feet and a delta angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds; THENCE in a Southwesterly direction along the arc of the said curve an arc dis- tance of 471.23 feet (chord bearing of South 44 degrees 30 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 424.26 feet) to a point at the end of the said curve; THENCE South 00 degrees 29 minutes 36 seconds West,140.00 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 270.00 feet and a delta angle of 32 degrees 26 minutes 55 seconds; THENCE in a Southerly direction along the arc of the said curve an are dis- tance of 152.91 feet (chord bearing of South 15 degrees 43 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 150.97 feet) to a point for corner at the Southwest corner of the D.I.S.D. tract; THENCE South 88 degrees 57 minutes 40 seconds East 517.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 04 minutes 22 seconds East 258.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 88 degrees 55 minutes 21 seconds east 280.00 feet to a point for corner in Farris Road; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East along Farris Road 593.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 07 minutes 05 seconds West 1,976.00 feet along Kings Row to a point for corner at the right-of-way of Loop 288; Z-1833 THENCE North 05 degr6. 04 minutes West 25 feet along t.,,d right-of-way of Loop 288 to a point for corner; THENCE North 50 degrees 10 minutes West 286 feet along the right-of-way to a point for corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 05 minutes 07 seconds West 469.50 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds East 1,029 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 15 minutes 49 seconds West 287.50 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 46 degrees 00 minutes East 129.00 feet to a point for corner; .THENCE North 44 degrees 00 minutes West 134.82 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 15 minutes 49 seconds West 102.50 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 44 degrees 20 minutes East 159.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 45 degrees 40 minutes West 122-CO feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 44 degrees 20 minutes East 80.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 45 degrees 40 minutes West 113.66 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 31 seconds East with the West line of the said 60.9975 acre tract 226,96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and enclosing in all 50,5 acres, more or less. COLEMAN & ASSOC. SURVEYING 417 S. LOCUST, SUITE 106 • P.O. Box 686 • DENTON, TEXAS 70202-0888 (817) 585.8216 9.,78 Acre Single Family-10 FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the James Coltart Survey Abstract Number 288, Denton County, Texas and being a part of the called 60.9975 acre tract described in the Deed from Dora Lee Reese to Teas- ley Road Association recorded in Volume 1541 Page 167 of the Deed Records of Denton County; Texas; the subject tract being more particularly described as followst BEGINNING for the Northeast Corner of the tract being described herein at an iron rod at the most Northerly Northeast Corner of the said 60..9975 acre tract; THENCE South 00 Degrees 00 Minutes 34 Seconds East with the East line of the said 60.9975 acre tract at 208.,60 feet passing an iron rod at a re-entrant corner of the said 60.19975 acre tract and continuing along said course, in all, a total distance of 329 feet more or less to a point in the Northerly right-o£-way of Greenfield Parkway ( proposed THENCE South 89 Degrees 30 MInutes 24 Seconds (Jest with the North line of the said parkway a distance of 43,„0 feet more or less to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 330 feet and a delta angle of 44 De- grees 31 Minutos 02 Seconds; THENCE in a Southwesterly direction along the arc of the said curve and with said right-of-way a distance of 256.4 feet more or less ( chord bearing of South 67 Degrees 14 Minutes 53 Seconds West a distance of 250.,00 feet ) to a point for a corner] THENCE North a distance of 70,.,0 feet more or less to a point for a corners THENCE (Jest a distance of 71J3 feet to a point for a corner at the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 430 feet and a delta angle of 45 Degrees 21 Minutes 05 Seconds; THENCE in a Southwesterly direction along the are of the said curve, being 100 feet from and parallel with the Northwesterly right-of-way of the above- mentioned Greenfield Parkway an are distance of 340 feet more or lose ( chord bearing of South 22 Degrees 10 MInutes 57 Seconds West a distance of 331.5 feet ) to a point at the end of the said curve; THENCE South 00 Degrees 29 Minutes 36 Seconds Gast continuing parallel with said parkway a distance of 140 feet more or less to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 140 feet and a delta angle of 51 Degrees 59 Minutes 26 Seconds; THENCE in a Southwesterly direction along the are of the said curve and Para- llel with said parkway an are length of 127,.,0 feet more or less ( chord bea.r- ing of South 25 Degrees 30 Minutes 07 Seconds West a distance of 122.,7 feet ) to a point at the end of the said curve; Page 2 THENCE South 51 Degrees 30 Minutes West a distance of 152.0 feet to a point in the North line of a proposed roads THENCE North 39 Degrees 58 Minutes West with the North line of the said road a distance of 189.0 feet more or less to a point in the West line of the above- mentioned 6019975 acre tracts THENCE North 46 Degrees 00 Minutes Cast a distance of 129.0 feet to a point for a corners THENCE North 44 Degrees 00 Minutes West a distance of 134,42 feet to a point for a corners THENCE North 00 Degrees 15 Minutes 49 Seconds West a distance of 102.•50 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 44 Degrees 20 Minutes East a distance of 159;,,00 feet to a point for a cornerj THENCE North 45 Degrees 40 Minutes West a distance of 122,00 feet to a point for, a cornerj THENCE North 44 Degrees 20 Minutes Cast a distance of 80,00 feet to a point f^r a corner) THENCE North 45 Degrees 40 Minutes West a distance of 113,,,66 feet to a point for a corners THENCE North 00 Degrees 15 Minutes 49 Seconds West with the West line of the said tract a distance of 229►.27 feet to the Northwest Corner of the said tract, also being the Southwest Corner of Oak Bend Estates] THENCE North 89 Degrees 17 Minutes East with the South line of the said Oak Bend Estates and the North line of the said 60•4975 acre tract a distance of 766/,0 feet r,iorc or less to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 9„78 acres of land more or less,/, These Field Notes were prepared from record information only.,, Michael J. Kern RoRmS,., Nov 4158 ..1.11••1.•• Date H1~ 111 H1N.1. 1...1v...111 4W r!All J. 1 111=a1u.1.1, ,..I,n 006 % 4158 1rte aooI. c,lgrtati! COLEMAN ASSOC., SURVEYING 7 S, LOCUST, SUITE 106 • P.O. BOX 686 . DENTON, TEXAS 76202,0688 (817) 585.8215 11.,7 Acre Future Park FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the D. Culp Survey Abstract Number 287 and the James Coltart Survey Abstract Num- ber 288, Denton County, Texas and being a part of the called 60..9975 acre tract described in the Deed from Dora Lee Reese to Teasley Road Association recorded in Volume 1541 Page 167 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas. The subject tract being more particularly de- scribed as followst BEGINNING for the most Northerly Northwest Corner of the tract being described herein at an iron rod at the Southwest Corner of a called 9.963 acre tract described in the Deed from Teasley Road Association to Denton Independent School District ( also known as Farris Road DISD Elementary ) recorded in Volume 1801 Page 818 of the Real Prop- erty Records; THENCE South 88 Degrees 57 Minutes 40 Seconds East with the South line of the said DISD Tract a distance of 257 feet more or less to a point for the Northeast Corner of the herein described tractl THENCE South a distance of 350,0 feet more or leas to a point for a corner; THENCE South 44 Degrees 49 Minutes (Jest a distance of 48,68 feet more of less to a point in the North line of a proposed road= THENCE North 39 Degrees 58 Minutes West with the North line of the said road a distance of 428 feet more or less to a point in the Easterly line of Greenfield Parkway ( proposed ) in a curve to the left having a radius of 270 feet and a delta angle of 17 Degrees 08 Minutes 20 Sec- onds (chord bearing of North 40 Degrees 31 Minutes 25 Seconds East a distance of 80.46 feet; THENCE in a Northeasterly direction along the arc of the said curve on the East line of the said parkway a distance of 80.8 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 1,.7 acres of land. These Field Notes were-prepared from record information only.. efe"O. 09 "904S Michael J. Kern R..P..S.• No. 4158 bate COLEMAN & ASSOCe SURVEYING 117 S. LOCUST, SUITE 106 • P.O. BOX 686 . DENTON, TEXAS 76202.0686 • (817) 565.8218 7,7 Acre Retail FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the D. Culp Sur- vey Abstract Number 287, Denton County, Texas and being part of the called 60,9975 acre tract described in the Deed from Dora Lee Reese to Teasley Road Association recorded in Volume 1541 Page 167 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the s0ject tract being move particularly described as followsr BEGINNING for the Northeast Corner of the tract being described herein at a point in the West line of the said 60,9975 acre tract, said point being South 01 Degree 05 Minutes 07 Seconds Cast a distance of 330 feet more or less from a fence corner post at the West Northwest Corner of the said 60.9975 acre tract; THENCE North 89 Degrees 07 Minutes East with a line parallel with the North line of the said 60,9975 acre tract a distance of 1008 feet more or less to a point for the Northeast Corner of the herein described tract; THENCE South 00 Degrees 53 Minutes East with a line being the projection of the most Northerly-West property line of the said 600975 acre tract a dis- tance of 358 feet more or less to a point in the South line of the said 60.9975 acre tract in Kings Row; THENCE South 89 Degrees 07 Minutes 05 Seconds West with the South line of the said 60.•9975 acre tract in Kings Row a distance of 789 feet more or less to an iron rod at the most Southerly Southwest Corner of the said tract; THENCE North 05 Degrees 04 Minutes West crossing said Kings Row a distance of 25 feet to an iron rod in the ;North line thereof and also being in the Northerly right-of-way of Loop 288; THENCE North 50 Degrees 10 Minutes West with said Northerly right-of-way a distance of 286 feet more or less to an iron rod in the West line if the said 60.9975 acre tract; THENCE North 01 Degree 02 Minutes 30 Seconds West with the West line of the said 60.9975 acre tract a distance of 146.5 feet more or less to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 7.7 acres of land more or less. These Field Notes were prepared from record information only,. i!'.sw... " ,le~' a 9 X9156 Michael J. Kern R.-P.-Se Nov 4158 Date COLEMAN & ASSOC. SURVEYING +w~wwirw, wow- 117 S. ZOCoUST, SUITE 108 . P.O. BOX 888 . DENTON, TEXAS 70202-MM . (817) 565.8215 31..4 Acre Single Family-7 FIELD NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the James Coltart Survey Abstract Number 288 and the av Culp Survey Abstract Number 2670 Den- ton County, Texas and being a part of the called 60,0975 acre tract describ- ed in the Deed from Dora Lee Reese to Teasley Road Association recorded in Volume 1541 Page 167 of the Dead Records of Denton 0ounty, Texas; the sub- ject tract being more particularly described as followst BEGINNING for the Southeast Corner of the tract being described herein at an iron rod at the Southeast Corner of the said Teasley Road Tract at the inter- section of Farris Road and Kings Row; THENCE South 89 Degrees 07 Minutes West with the South line of the said tract in Kings Row a distance of 1187 feet more or lose to a point in the West line of Greenfield Parkway ( proposed THENCE North 00 Degrees 53 Minutes West a distance of 352 feet more or less to a point for a re-entrant corner of thet herein described tract] THENCE South 89 Degrees 07 Minutes West a distance of 1008 feet more or less to a point in the West lino of the said Teasley Road Tract; THENCE North 01 Degree OS Minutes 07 Seconds West with the West line of the said tract a distance of 329 feet to a fence corner post at the West Northwest Corner of the said tract; THENCE North 89 Degrees 03 Minutes 42 Seconds East with the North line of the said tract a distance of 1029 feet to a fence corner post at a re-entrant cor- ner of the said Teasley Tract; THENCE North 00 Degrees 15 Minutes 49 Seconds West with the West line of the said Teasley Tract a distance of 285 feet more or lose to a point in the North line of a proposed road; THENCE South 39 Degrees 58 Minutes East with the North line of the said road a distance of 1894 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 51 Degrees 30 Minutes East a distance of 15214 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the loft having a radius of 1404 feet and a delta angle of 51 Degrees 59 Minutes 26 Seconds; THENCE in a Northeasterly direction along the arc of the said curve 140 feet parallel to the West line of the abovementioned parkway an arc distance of 127 feet ( chord bearing North 25 Degrees 30 Minutes East a distance of 122.0,7 feet ) to a point at the and of the said curve; THENCE North 00 Degrees 29 Minutes 36 Seconds West a distance of 140 feet to a point for a corner at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 430 feet and a delta anglo of 45 Degrees 21 Minutes 05 Seconds; THENCE in a Northeasterly direction along the are of the said curve being 100 feet from and parallel with the West line of the said Greenfield parkway an are distance of 340 feet ( chord bearing North 22 Degreer. 10 Minutes 57 Seconds East a distance of 331.5 feet ) to a point; THENCE East a distance of 71.0 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South a distance of 70..,0 foot to a point in the North line of the said parkway in a curve to the right having a radius of 330.0 feet and a delta angle of 44 Degrees 31 Minutes 02 Seconds) THENCE in a Northeasterly direction along the arc of the said curve and the North line of the said parkway an are length of 256.40 feet ( t:hord bearing of North 67 Degrees 14 Minutes 53 Seconds East a distance of 250,..00 eeet ) to a point at the and the said curvet THENCE North 89 Degrees 30 Minutes 24 Seconds East continuing with the North line of the said parkway a distance of 43,0 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 00 Degrees 00 Minutes 34 Seconds East a distance of 120,30 feet to a iron rod at a re-entrant corner of the said Teasley Tract in its North line; THENCE North 89 Degrees 33 Minutes 05 Seconds East with the North line of the said tract a distance of 417.•0 feet to an iron rod at the East Northeast Corner of the said tract in Farris Road; THENCE South 14ith the East line of the said tract in Farris Road a distance of 150.00 feet to an iron rod at the Northeast Corner of a called 9,963 acre tract known as DISD Farris Road Elementary; THENCE South 89 Degrees 30 Minutes 24 Seconds West with the North line of the said DISD Tract in the center of the said parkway a distance of 460.,0 feet more or less to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 300,0 feet and a delta angle of 90 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds; THENCE in a Southwesterly direction along the are of the said curve an are dist- ance of 471.23 feet ( chord bearing of South 44 Degrees 30 Minutes 24 Seconds Rest a distance of 424.26 feet ) to a point at the end of the said curve; THENCE South 00 Degrees 29 Minutes 36 Seconds East continuing with said parkway and the (Jest line of the said DISD Tract a distance of 140..00 foot to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 270 feet and a delta angle of 49 Degrees 35 Minutes 11 Seconds; THENCE in a Southerly direction along the arc of the said curve an arc distance of 233.7 feet more or less ( chord bearing of South 24 Degrees 17 Minutes 59 Seconds West a distance of 226.45 feet ) to a point in the North line of a proposed road; THENCE South 39 Degrees 57 Minutes 48 Seconds East with the North line of the said road a distance of 478.0 feet more or less to a point for a corner; THENCE North 01 Degrees 44 Minutes 57 Seconds East a distance of 73..23 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North a distance of 35060 feet to a point in the South line of the abovemen- tioned DISD Tract; page 3 THENCE South 88 Degrees 57 Minutes 40 Seconds Cast with the South line of the said DISD Tract a distance of 260 feet to an iron rod at the Northwest Corner of a called 1,66 acre tract described in the Deed from Dora Lee Reese to Irene BwWilson recordert in Volume 1542 Page 35 of the said Dead Records; THENCE South 00 Degrees 04 Minutes 22 Soconds Cast with the west line of the said Wilson Tract a distance of 258,.0 feet to an iron rod at its Southwest Corner; THENCE South 88 Degrees 55 FIinutes 21 Seconds Cast with the South line of the 4aid Wilson Tract a distance of 280.•0 feet to ar. iron rod at the Southeast Cor- ner of the said tract in the middle of Farris Road and the East line of the said Coltart Survey; THENCE South with the East line of the said Teasley Road Tract in Farris Road a distance of 593 feet more or less to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 31,4 acres of land more or leas; 'hese Field Notes were prepared from record information only., rM•.., ,0g a7 X984,7 6 Michael J., Kern R„P.•S., Now 4158 `r,4~:• r.ft Date .x hiICFIA~L J. K-4RN ...x...,.•4288 A~~~C`SU~ 1~yo EXHIBIT CONCEPT PLAN FOR GREENFIELD WOODS, CONSISTING OF: 1. Conceptual Site Plan (1 page) 2. Tree Conservation Statement (1 page) 3. General Notes and Development Schedule (2 pages) Z-1833 ~J L r..' ' Y11r~y6 . ' Wow. r rr. W Yw ~V {rf,W 1• I. Wr 1r1 wr.r. w I _ 4rRYN RO44NRY I 1 CITY LlAAlr ,'~~~-~Iyw.t,• . 1 ~ ~ ~f y Yllill ~ YtY ~ bMl YNI t1rrrru.•ryr. M 1 ' ' sp. N' IPa. J/ ff b~ ,I . ~ IWI qf..Y/C/NItY MAP., t , n L - rR!NIYor 1.11rrw ~..JJ arrrrnrp r-4 ,me C • 66 'lc11111 04io , RwW •,ti Mu~jNY i...Yl. 1 `.y' M A .rtl IwMIW MFML, I.I MfW M S ~rW., YID ~ . I 1 SCALE I'•240 CA.pleunuRel, .r' k• KN' " 11 ~~M.l.~ . I. ~N1wrRY~YlY1 nw wwi` , ~ ~ ~ I 1E "w~^.1.~}"','.~Ti-''•ewufAT"i...rt.'. #10 " W rr/~ 1111011 /1n AO,O. * S F 1 ~ N tl•,~~nM fN1 1tN1 t111,Y~r1r~r. Ap. ' Y hog" or - % ' A ~ ~ ! ;C ~ uva.cr ~tw ltrttAt 2 W tr11r eta.. t..'1l 11. '1 I,wO1r1.1C,wr1« 1O1RM1. ti rr w W.11t wn. ~5 ` - 61'1.6. '+,/4~y N~nr A 61 ..M M~q / C~rtaa l .1. TeOLeY ROAD A0dZlA7e*A?S c% MR j.v. y,'RAN*r 1s P.O. sore !17 76101 ' Icrer[r rvhC.ta. IKCJnfJUrlA4. e ~ , for f [eet. 0ATtlsry,e6 AFtl5rWrIMP WOODS <z~x BURKE ENGINEERING xz> >aHC1t71 GaIJ Err PLtel..l Iz~vlSlau 4i7 A. Locus7, W n 1pe' e91070N, ttxAl 74201 44M 444• $714 = r 3 Teasley Road Associates P.Q. Box 117 Denton, Texan 78202 (817) 383-1320 August 14, 1986 GREENFIELD WOODS ADDITION Planned Development Tree Conservation Approximately fifty per cent (508) of the land area at Greenfield Wood is covered by native trees of varying heights and caliper. it is the intent of the developer to remove only those trees directly in roadways paved portion only) or those that cannot be saved during utility construction. Every effort will be made to coordinate construction of streets and utilities in order to save as many trees as possible. Upon completion of development phase, restrictions will be filed of record to prohibit removal of trees from developed lots without the permission of the developers' Architectural Control Committee. A standing restriction will also require that each lot have a l(ii,limum of two (2) trees in each the front and back yard of the home. As in the past, the developer will relocate as many trees as possible during the development process. Out, goal is to preserve trees, not to destroy them. z - f33 GREENF'IELD WOODS CONCEPT PLAN REVISION GENERAL NOTES: 1. Statement of Intent It is intended that this 50.45 acres, be zoned and annexed within the City limits of the City of Denton; and be subdivided as requested on accompaning Concept Plan above. Teasley Road Associates being the sole owners of the property, wish to designate a portion c sforemehtdon6d suibdivision.for a PUBLIC PARK. 2. Relation to Comprehensive Plan Be it known that this development is intended to meet or exceed the City of Denton requirements in direct relation to the City's comprehensive plan for this area of Denton, specifically the areas being designated for Educ- ation, Public Usage, and Preservation of Existing Natural Landscape and Foliage whenever possible. 3. Acreage: Total acreage- 51.07 Ac, gross Area Summary: Gross Area: 51.07 Street ROW: 2.13 T,PALE=gmt.: 1.6 _ NET ACREAGE: 47.34 4. Land Uses Density General Retail 7,7 Ac. 40% F.A.R. 3.08 Ac. SF7 31.5 Ac. 4.4 U/Ac. 112 lots SF10 9.78 Ac. 3.4 U/AC. 27 lots Public Park 1.47 Ac. 50.45 Ac. 5. Off Site Information All adjacent property lies outside of Denton City Limits Zoned "A" except proposed Loop 288. 6. Traffic and Transportation Projected Traffic Amounts Trip Generation Acreage Level Avg, Trips Total Land Use Factor of Development Acre Trips Single Family SF-7 10 trips/D,U. 4.4 D.U./Ad. 44 1386 trips Single Family SF-10 10 trips/D.U. 3.4 D.U.-/Ac. 34 354 trips General Retail 60 trips/D.U. 17,424 sq. ft./Ac. 1045 8047 trips Public Park 10 trips/Ac. 1.5 Ac. 15 15 trips Total trips daily 9787 7. Buildings aa) See Concept Plan "Example" ~bb) Maximum height- 2 story (cc) Setbacks- see Concept Plan above. (dd) non-residential total floor area., not to exceed 40% of 7.90 Ac.= 3,16Ac. continued- ~BC81PRn nir^ 9 R fQRq GREENFIELD WOODS CONCEPT PLAN REVISION GENERAL NOTES: (page P 8. Residential Subdivision (aa) 142 lots, for location see Concept Plan above (bb) see Concept Plan "Example" (cc) setbacks- see Concept Plan "Example" 9. Water and Drainage Site is out of 100 year flood plain. There are no ponds, creeks, or lakes. 10, Utilities Texas Power and Light Easement- see Concept Plan above. No existing gas lines on site. Proposed utilities: have been submitted 2-6-86 11. Trees See Concept Plan above for limit of existing trees. 12. Open Space See Concept Plan above. 13. Screening Natural screening to be used wherever possible with berms and fences to be added between areas of different land use and adjacent property. 14. Development Schedule Section Detailed Plan Construction 1 Jan. 1987 Aug. 1988 2 Sept. 1988 Oct. 1989 3&4 July 1989 Aug. 1990 15. Minimum lot areas are 7000 sq. ft. for SF-7 and 10,000 sq. ft. for SF-10. 16. Proposed Sanitary and Water Lines are shown and will be sized and designed according to current subdivision ordinance requirements. DATE: 10/07/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Farrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary and final replat of the north one-half of Lot 2, Block 33, Original Town of Denton Addition. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. SUMMARY: This is the site of the old Dairy Queen at 520 S, Elm. The property presently accomodates an automobile dealer- ship. Approval of the replat will permit the development of a storage/repair facility at the rear of the lot. BACKGROUND: A variance of water flow requirements for fire pTOtect.ion was approved by the City Council at its regular meeting of September 16, 1986. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: owner FISCAL IMPACT: undetermined Respectfully submitted: 1 1 yW f~a r rele l1 City Manager Pr ared by: David Ellison Urban Planner Appro Udd k4oa*~ e ey4t Director of Planning and Community Development CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-11P 40 MARY SHEET MEETING DATE: October 7,, 1986 SU3JECT; Approval of the preliminary and final replat of the north one-half of Lot 2, Block 33, original Town of Denton Addition. SUMKARY: This is a 0.619 acre parcel located adjacent and west of. South Elm Street betwtan Highland and Stroud. The property is zoned commercial (C) and is the site of an old Dairy Queen. A storage and maintenance building that will operate in conjunction with a used car lot is the proposed new use. Existing public facilities (streets, drainage, utilities) are adequate for the proposed use. Sidewalk has been requested along the property frontage. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the replat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ATTACHMENT: Reduced replats (preliminary and replat of record) 4, a. ~ David Ellison Senior Planner 1378s f"y tMl{LING Oull DING r i MOd 7 I, 9 3 CWKMD INVMMEWS y ~t s. Doe. INS S. [LM Sr. _ LOT I OCNTON,Tx mot _ - cglo~l l Vr ty f f rl ate', N w r0' Or' [ IDIOM' COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 21I.SS' lu It PIP 114 r0ti ~51Elect Eosemen! ~IrNACr✓ HM it r T [Ail w. uioerlt ,s ' SISIIthC[ I ,f. IA , ~ tt SaTON J - , T[ T1I01 10111 0MMlhC1AE DISTRICT AL 4050 [416TINO I1.00 O r y r CONC AirNAlr• `µ"1t, • 0! , ~te0:c r PAD r r itiv {fi49 ` Wt J) Y I ~ v,fN ~tl fl Ihew{I LOT 2 A ncl"rrv NAP u'+ 2000'1 eT. \ Ai rIWT~ fNNE HALF (IF LOl rr M S SMIRIR R1aoNIT ait. `M i' ''a r ° too"4.ANS 67• 2 WIN, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT [boll ETAL e[ KNNELL NTON ,T[xAr MW MALY OF LOT 2 $14 S. 11.10 ST. blNTON,TE%AS tr:ol JAM[S N. NORTON 34? 1141e1 [i[ MONI. ANOST KNM ,Tx 711a SM 3144 , w 3" 1411 PRELIMINARY PLAT 0.619 ACRES A REPLAT SENCN MARK, S.E. two? N 11"Wid S 10116 it 1'. T. or 41 G1N 3I"I 600,1 emtb NORTH ONE HALF Of LOT 2, BLOCK 33 a[v. 114.11 Mr.L. OR141NAL TOWN OF DENTON DENTON COUNTY ;TE'XAS "VISED NxISM [h- e14eREATN, M40LL a ASSOOIATIt, INC. D[vt40KRdOMM[RgAI STRUCTURLS a MiT1Rl011r INC. 10.0, 11" a" 420JOUTWOORx RevilmdWay 25,1946 L[W}MVILL[, TOW TS041 L[IWt&VLLIrTXTS067 SCALE.1%S0' 11141 411 6711 Il NI all "It G{M"MA gaUM • A.rNNn, Ira. ~.Ar~~.r rr s XCT cw«N0 tlryi1TN11Nn 1100. 111 It. I LN IT, LOT I IItNTON,YX r6tol 11R, no !0 01 t Most COAtrAAi ACIAL 0111fRIOT L 291.71' SP,. ~ 11.R. 1. [ a' E leer. EosarlerA ~ at ~ ,a, aRL w. o t 14NOaTt f r ►1com i:i LOT 2 q 17 'xll . ; tl 20"1"0 ~ C000 RCL1L OffrRICT I, (1•W V a, f ,t it J t JOHN IL I v 1's r) to SIMI NORTH vide HALF OF 00"A1p>A, tk11N9M0 dfURtAM,Me01LL ! AfTOC14tt1 , INC BLOCK 33 P. 0. PO« l»! TC=4p*m , LL*10119,19941 710!1 707 !!!1 I+tt1 N, NOA'fpf tpqt WNRI$d RtODNfT INC, 7Y YtC ad (tM dbd Litt f! NINILANO K `f• l LM ~ 2 HOO rr, TO,yt999yyyt M10~1 T9 10901 NNtLL MMOltR000WdACIAL STRUCTURES a lmicamn SK k I ARO = t` a~O t IAL 1TRlCT tuts 50 090 fOUTWOR« OINTOft,INt,T>< T6to1 .t I..' SOUTH ONE HALF OF LOT 2 LtwI1VlLLt,YM 15067 fir' yr !.UWtR's CAATI/IUH ANO Or0l Ctt shed ~t 1914) ttl 5511 frATp a fAAt , ok"" N oulooO NMfN4 N, NAArT htNEf torforAfetil, INC., Ara b?A',A Or 164AS , J' the 00"01 H A t1Nt Of treat of land •ItOAted !6 the tl, L4V1n9 C&"?v Of 0901000 Iwwrr heim"a Aw,Mf 117, 16 the City and CdeAty e! NALOA, 20"0,( holes t" "r!h 940-Mit At Let TV0 In sleet "Irty-tL011 Nfert the 0AN0119ned better ►oelle in And sot MA14 enuaty Anil "001411" to agA Afl9lNl f.. 4/ Wed[, Are 40.11 state " this day paraanalty IDtta014 IlAUy T, atA1y Am)" to M to ,tAI. PLAT To"a eed sales All ttAat ofsole tCNt of sannd eanveyt0 ey d♦.d to ens [bA mete nAN U rvll..erl0nd to Also fa0u1stns InYt rYrnt / p FINAL ' 1. W,aa ro Will ~ t~[A~leMinor O(AO/e ten aCOUnI/ fesaa~[bJ And hO aotnOt,UdgN to tM ghat M eNOUteJ lAa 1.10 fo[ Clio pdf peso O•e 1g AL`f1Eg MIN date tOnlatl arlr jeteNNd as to of Chi And 00ASl dt01t lent thaHln apyeated odd In r4pA[Ity ill il "is 6l6104, A REPLAT ustotde at N lt" fed tOVed lo[ NrNr in tAt'r01t IIA, at OIVtt lrptA soy MANO ANO ttAO Of OPTICS nn Chia tn. day of of SWAM at* $treat A - , Ms. WhAle ea.ti,.y having t $Atf-vsy of 10.0 NORTH ONE HALF OF LOT 2 9 BLOCK 33 feat said irlat Mfn9 tha AILtMeaa What at 0! eatd let said Mls~ ►elep also the Mrt"edt Nther at sAi4 made Lem) ORIGINAL TOWN OF' DENTON path, 11t,i1 tees .7th " 94 wet line et 64 14 eta terut ad AD COUNTY TEXAS N Y lea gold 10007 tef sot"[1 we rA~ , 6 an e a 13 Ou y 443 11M, DENTON COUNTY, Flows a @l l M 771.01 feat to 66 Iron too 10064 let my eotAt Ulen $470:1 thrwf to Not l(AO Of Iald Let is A 1 IOtVITOAV CLAT1TlCA19 , y 1ttrto ArU, lls,tt tool VILA "to Net Ilnt of 14W Lot I to an 1, W, ttOV64 Ollereath sai lered ►Wlle t4tearaf MOdgOf Mt, do Ira "it alt too seiner, Nld point 14169 the nee thwrt 000600 of herNy Cathy that this tower vet >totaled free An actual aorvar ~'sold ttl 1! 0440 on tAt 9fwed And dots te4u01Nly reprleant !hat survey Nbt 11 •it't• t Y o a Mt "Ito IIAA tt NId Let 1, M ( 1 rat td the rlhes wsafw AAA 1.69.76969 4.410 a4... , REV ISED , 'I• Neat, ""aft", new All Nee Or "IM Nss9o"t Rlvi56d+M0y 25, 1986 riot OUltl Ott" 80 0018", INC,~ M AAA the*"% tM AAde01l1 AOa Its self adt"tftod t9tat, AOA hoi,44 INst this plat NA19nallAl sittt /CALL' I~•104 t tea Nrote d/ootlh" I"Ma ar N t,At fA 111649 11 08191641 To" of , . „ b - small Do"" Codmi =4, 605 dNA k6fsfy, 4441 Ntd to tha "rri" W viii imptovaetsi{~i6"itatNSby the plame thtlNA sM aN..e~11t0~11~a ,t.dlagg. w ' 1 ~S~' ~_`+a+tsr Age QW. ~ul T. pis" DATE: October 7, 1986 t CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJEC'T': CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER 02, BID #9550, WATER TREATMENT PLANT UPURAI)h (PHASh I), BOSWELL COMPANY, TO REDUCE THE CONTRACT AMOUNT BY $20682.54 AND CONSIDER FINAL PAYMENT TO CON'T'RACTOR. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board and Utilities staff, recommend to the City Council approval of the subject change order and final payment. The change order (#F2) involves a reduction of $2,682.54 which is included in the final payment to Boswell Co. in the amount of $16,135.07. SUMMARY: The City Council awarded the low bid of $463,077 to Boswell Co. on January 29, 1986. Subsequently, February 18, 19660 the City Council also approved Change Order 41 to reduce the contract amount by $168,743,00 to $2990734.000 The Change Order N1 deleted the replacement of eight (8) filter media, which are presently being replaced by in house personnel and is 100% completed. During the course of construction, it was decided to eliminate chemical piping and the tie-in of the 36" filtered water line, as this can be efficiently achieved during Phase lI construction which is to be scheduled shortly. This elimination results in a cost reduction of $2,682.54 and thus the request for Change Order N2 to reduce the contract amount by $29b82.54. With the approval of Change Order M2, the revised contract amount will be $297,051.46. The contractor has successfully completed the revised scope of work. The request for final payment is in the amount of $16,135.07. O231n:l Change Order y2 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The Phase I construction involves the installation of serpentine weir on the basin to increase hydraulic capacity; the addition of potassium permanganate feed system at the raw water lake; and the installation of a 36" filtered water line from filters to clear well. This is Phase 1 of the expansion of the water plant from 24 M61) to 30 MUD. PROGRAMS, DbPARTMbNTS OR GROUPS AFFbCTLD: City of Denton, City of Denton Municipal Utilities, Freese & Nichols, Boswell Co., Citizens FISCAL IMPACT: Low bid, approved January 29, 1986 $463,077.00 C. 0. 01, approved February 18, 1986 -163,343.00 C. U. 02 this request . 2,682.S4 Revised Contract mount ~'9' oV51.40 Previous Payments -480 916.39 Final ayment, due this request 16',135.07 Source of funds: Water Bonds Acct 0623-008-U460-9101 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Harrell Prepared by: City Manager tf~' . `"D * av tram Assistant Director of Utilities Water/Wastewater Divisions Appro d: Nelson- Director of Utilities Attachments: Change Order 02 (copy) Final Payment Request Location map PUB Minutes 9/21/66 0231n:2 r I CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK ORDER PROJECT: Denton 'dater Treatment Plant Jp9rade - Phase i CONTRACT: No, 9550 OWNER: City of Denton CONTRACTOR: The Boswell Company CHANGE ORDER NO. Two (2) DATE: July 1, 1986 CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK TO RE PERFORMED 1. Delete 320 feet of 3-inch diameter schedule 80 PUC pipe ano appurt- enances for chlorine feed lines, Deduct ($4,094,00) 2. Provide and install 36-inch dished head cap for future (Connection. Alter pipe configuration. Add $ 11411,46 `ota) ($2,682,54) In* contractor hereby accepts Shin aa)ustaent at a final and cbaplete eourtable 4d)4staent In 101: accord and sac,stactlun Of at{ past, pres.nt and future liability orlgirut,ng under ano clause on the Contract by reason of the fact$ And CirCuesUnCes giving rose to this aOalfication, Previous Contract amount 5299,134.00 Net fhurAc*j(decreasi)incontract amount $ 2,682.54 Revised contract amount $291,051.46 Not(Increase)(docreoso)in contract time of completion N/A Revised contract time of completion N/A Recommended by Approved by OWNER FREEST: AND NICHOLS 1 gY--- pis)r)bvlion: Approved by CONTRACTOR 1.- Ilan, Enq (l` r~'✓~/) CONTR.ACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT OF BILLS PAID I~ STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS Personally, before me the undersigned authority, on this da.y appeared_.__ _ Jimmy Q. Bgswg3l who being duly sworn, on oath, says that he is the legal representative of___._Tbe_ Qos.wel I C_ompdny._ And that Contract No._ N/A_ for the construction of the project designated as Water Treatment Plant Upgrade has been completed in accordance with the Plan% and Slrcificaiiatt< rind (:unlr tct Documents, and that all bills for materials, apparatus, fixtures, machinery and labor used in connection with the construction of this project have, to the best of his knowledge and belief, bcen fully paid. 7-- . tative for the Contractor SWORN TO .4NT) SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this the. 29th.__day of. _ Aug us t~ 19.86. Notary PubL+ in an for firatos nty, Texat {SEAL) } r"IOMAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT Periodical Estimate No Seven Peri A a to Au ust 31 1986 The City of Denton erv ceCenter` , 9M -A 'tTexas-Str Name of Owner: -Address: Denton, Texas 76201 P. x 4G47, 1720 ara Lane Wame of Contractor: The Boswel 1 Company Address: Bryan, Texas 77805 Typeof Project: 14ater Treatment Plant Upgrade Estimated Contract Cost: S 299,134.00* Item unit uantftr Quantity Vs1w of No. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM of theieal Completed unit ~~p d Measure Estimate to Data Price Work 1. Mobilization L.S. 1 100 % $13,500 13,500.00 2. 36" Filtered Mater Line L.S. 1 100 % $40,354 40,354,00 3. Sernentine t'leir Pans L.S. 1 100 % $142,91 142,913,00 4. Potassium Permanqanate Feed System L.S. 1 100 % $71,140 71,140.00 5. Air Handlinq Unit L.S. 1 100 % $26,427 26,427.00 6. Replace Filter Ladders and Clean Under Filter Bottoms L.S. 1 100 % $5,400 5,400.00 "Contract amount includes C.O. N1 Deduction for Proposal Items 2,6, and 7 'r•! inderiiiped contractor acetifies that ill wort, indtidinq ^iaterials and enui;,®ent na^o, ccver!d by this e r midi sal Pdynient has Deem cu°oI eted dr delivered IM atuirda n to with the Contract Cc -w ts, Ihit all amounts 'dve teen paid by him for wore. Td ter N ls, and equl,imeiit for which yrev lOuS ni,r iodic al jsyi'entS were Issied and received from the Owner, and that the current payment s~Own nlttan'T'Stftiw-Sue. :ch19acroa The Boswell Comaany e__ - - _ __eau 8/29/8 fi SYDSCrlbtd and Sworn to blrore q! LhIS 2 -•~~day of Auyl!SL. 1986 , Votary NO It! ^ ' 1 My Coimisston ExpiresJun 9, 1989 Recommended for Payment by: Total Value of Original Contract Performed , , • , 2 4zL Q Extra Work Performed Shown Above or (21682.54) Freese and Nicho s Date Attached Statement l r)1 ~~r~, t °~)'~JaL Vaterials on Hand--Shown Above -0- Oats Attached Statement ' Total Value of Work to Date. . . . . • 297,051.46 Date Less: Amount Retained 0 96 -0- Net Amount Earned on Contract , . , , , , , , 297.051.46 Date 280,916.39 Less: Amount of Previous Payments . . . , Approved for Payment By: BALANCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE . . , , , , 16,135.07 Da te ANGE ORDERS; 'Change Order 2 - Delete 320 ft. of pipe and Install dished head cap $(2,682.54) Sub-Total - Work Completed M Change Orders ~~2682. 4) ' I t W LANr OGA~ N ~,wi 040m 65 ~V^ rG R? 1U~~~ fi. '1.~.. y F µ y 1• f 1 l Y Rr TON LOr \ iY It I I f ~ ~ 1 r ~~•11 _ } ~ 1 r , fly-~~~ w• ~lJ ~ ~ ~ r VICINITY MAP i EXCERPT FROM MINUTES OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD 09/24/66 13. CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER 02 BID N 9SS0WATER TREATMENT PLANT UFGkADE P10h 1) U REDUCE CONTRACT AM U B Has explained that the Utility Staff and Freese a Nichols recommend approval of the subject change order and final payment. The change order involves the reduction of $2,682.54 which is included in the final payment to Boswell Co. in the amount of $16,13S.07. Coos►es moved to recommend to the city Councii approval of the subject change order and final payment to Boswell Co. { in the amount of $16,135.07. Thompson second., All ayes, t no nays, motion carried unanimously. DATE; October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: N CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER 1 AND FINAL PAYMENT TO DICKERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. BID #96670 1986 CIP STATE SCHOOL WATER LINK. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board recommends to the City Council approval of the Change Order 01 in the amount of $4,780.00. The Public Utilities Hoard also recommends approval of the Final Payment in the amount of $10,372.18 to Dickerson Construction Co., Celina, Texas. SUMMARY: The original contract amount approved earlier by the City Council is $75,294.25. The contractor has successfully completed the work and the actual con- struction cost is $80,074.25 $4,780.00 over the original contract amount. This increase is due to about 1,755 pounds of cast, iron fittings that were used. Cast iron fittings is a zero quantity bid item, the actual quantity is generally determined during actual construction because of unknown field conditions. The contractor has been paid $69,702.07 so far and the final payment due, including the change order requested above, is $10,372.18. The Public Utilities board recommends approval of the final payment in the amount of $10,372.18. BACKGROUND: This is an approved 1986 CIP project. The existing 1411 feeder line to the town of Corinth and Lake Cities had an 811 bottleneck and this bottleneck has been removed by the installation of 29705 LF of new 1411 water line. PROGRAMS, PARTMkNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton Municipal, Utilities, City of Denton, llickerson Construction, Citizens 0231n:3 7,1 Change Order/Final Payment Dickerson Construction Co. Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Uriginal contract amount $75,254.25 Change order #1 4this request) + 4,780,00 Revised contract amount 9 x'5 Previous payments -69,4,V2.07 Final payment due JI :18 Source of funds: Bond Acct #623-008-0461-9138 Respectfully submitted: oy Harrell Prepared by: City Manager A41~ avt am Assistant Uirectur of Utilities Water/Wastewater Divisions Ap v )d, , R. b, e on Director of Utillties Attachments: Final invoice Location main PUB Minutes 9/24/86 0231n:4 - Y. V P0101mrCOIN DENTON, TEXAS 7 624 CITY OF DENTON PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT 817/566-8200, D/FW METRO 434-2520 Engineering Division 817/566-8358 Utility Department 817/566-8451 Periodical Estimate No. Finel Period 7/31/86 To 8/25/86 Contractor Dickerson Construction Co. Address P 0 Sox 181 Celina, Tx 75009 Project State School Rd. Estimated Contract cost $ Z~7;9450 Bid No. 9607 P.O. No. 33 No. Contract Work Days 60 Days Used I I f Unit I Quantity I Quantity I I DESCRIPTION OF WORK I of I Original I Completed I Unit 1 Value I Item I1 1 I Measure Estimate I To Date I of Completed I 1 2. 12.54 14" Ductile Iron Pipe 1 l .f. I I I Price I work I 12.12,8 I Cast Iron Fittings lhs. 1 2705 270 1$ 19,85 1$53,694.25 1 -0- 1 1755 1 2.50 1 4,387,50 I 1 2.12.20b 6" PVC Water Pipe 1 l.f, 1 23 1 12 1 20.00 1 240.00 1 12.131-A1 14" Gate Valve ea. 1 3 1 3 11,520.00 1 4,560.-C I 12.13.1CI 6" Gate Va;ve ea. 1 8 1 8 1 350.00 1 21800.00 1 1 2,13.2 1 1" Air Release Valve I ea. 1 2 1 2 1 500.00 1 1 2.14 1 6" Fire hydrant I ea. I 11000.00 1 4 1 4 1 650.00 I 29600,00 I 3-B Remove Curb & Gutter 1 l.f. 1 8 1 8 1 20.00 1 160.00 1 3- Remove Sidewalk do Dr. 1 S.Y. 1 95 1 95 1 25.00 1 2,375.00 I 1 5.7-B I Type D Asphalt Patch 1 ton 1 30 1 34 1 80.00 1 2,720.00 I 1 7.4 1 Concrete Encasement 1 c.y. 1 5 1 5 1 70,00 1 350.00 1 1 8.2.-A 1 concrete Curb & Gutter, l.f. 1 8 1 8 1 10.00 1 80.00 1 8.3 I Type A Concrete I s.y. 1 95 1 95 1 27 1 SP-2 concrete Sawcut I l,f. 1 420 1 418 .00 1 2,565,00 14" Ca I 1 5,00 1 2,090,00 I 1 1~ p ea. 1 -0- 1 1 1 250.00 1 250.00 i I SP-8 I 12 0.I. Pipe I 1, f. 1 -0- 1 3 I 17.50 1 52.50 1 1 1 1211 Cap i ea. i 1 1 1 I 150,001 150.00 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I ! I I 1 I I I I J I I u+-,it I Quantity I Quantity I I Value I I DESCRIPTION OF WORK I of I Original i Completed I Unit I of Completed ! item I Measure I Estimate I To Date I Price I Work ! ! I 1 I I ! ! I I I I 1 I I ! I 1 I ! I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I 1 I I I I f 1 I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I { I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I f I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I E 1 I I I 1 I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I i I I I I I ~ I I I 1 I The undersigned Contractor certifies that all work, including materials and equipment on hand, covcred by this Periodical Payment has been completed or delivered in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for work, materials, and equipment for which previous Periodical Payments were issued and received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now ,du/e4 CONTRACTOR Dickerson Construction Co.gyDate 08/26/85 Recommended f Payment by: Total Value of Original Contract Performed $80,C7;:.25 xtra Work Performed - Shown Above or .OC P ,et Inspector /Date Attached Statement E/2Z/9M aterials on Hand - Shown Above or .00 Insp tion Dept. Date Attached Statement '11 ITotal Value of Work to Date 80,074.25 Less: Amt. Retained -C- 3 .00 Net Amount Earned on Contract Approved for Payment By: Less Amount of Previous Payments 690702.07 0 BALANCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE $10,372.18 Utility Dept. or City Engr- Date 1232] DICKERSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. P. 0. 80X 181 • CELINA, TEXAS 75009 . (214) 382.2123 OR 382.2761 Extra C.I. Fittings: 12" X 14" Reducer 355 lbs. 14" 2 2210 390 " 14" - 11}° 395 " 14" X 14" X 8" Tae 615 " Total 1,755 lbs. 14" STAT(d' SCNddL VtF)T~R L1A.JE , rA r ;t € 3S G o a awo• ~ ct,r u uo+, o VICINITY MAP . EXCERPT rRON'NINUTEB or PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD 09/24/86 11. CONSIDEk CHANGE ORDER dl BID 09667 AND FINAL PAYMENT TO ' Has explained that the staff recommends approval of the subject change order in the amount of $4,780.00; and final ayment in the amount of 10,3'12.18 to Dickerson ~onstruction Co. Coos** moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the subject change order, and final payment to Dickerson Construction Co. in the amounts stated. Thompson second. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. 4,ti` TEX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8240 September 24, 1986 M D M 0 R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician THRU: William J. Anderson, Assistant Director of Finance SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund RECOMMENDATION: Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued. SUMMARY: Chapter 31,11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for re- funds in excess of $500.00. Taxpayer, K & M Enterprises, has requested a refund in the amount of $1,161.55 for double payment of property tax account 8900-00072. BACKGROUND: K & M Enterprises should have paid 1985 taxes in the am- ount of $1,161.55 instead of $2,323.10. Difference to be refunded between correct and incorrect amounts. FISCAL IMPACT: $1,161.55 to be refunded. Respectfully submitted: d~ ctor Schneider Tax Technician a A. An erson Assist nt Director of Finance - r. State Property Tax Board Tax Refund Application 31.11 (2/82) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Name Collecting Tax For: (Taxing tmitsj 215 E, McKinne Denton, Texas 76201 Address City State Zip Code .rrr...r..rrrr•rr.rrr.r.rrrrrrrrrr....rrrrrrrrrr rrr.rrrrr r..rrrr.rr rr r+..r...r r. In order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER: Name: K & if Enterprises/ for Hanna Khraiah Address: Telephone er (ir a one Information is nee e : IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Description of Property: A0421A J. Fisher, Tract `.Acres 12.094 ress~"or`~ Location o Property: N - Account Number of Property: ggo~0_pp_0~2~ or ax ece p Number: INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of Tax From Which Refund Which Refund Oate of the Amount of Tax Refund Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested 1. City of Din on 19 7'-25 /19 $ 1. 1 6y . 55 51.161_ , 55 3. C tv pis „Den on 19-31 /19~ S 1 , 6~ • 5a $ 0.00 / 19 $ Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation) : 'we_Paid taxes on property owned by Hanna Khraish on July -25, 1986 and these same taxes were again paid on July 31, 19 6 We request refund of overpaid amounts. "I hereby apply for the refund of the above described taxes and certify that the information I have given on this form is true and correct." gna urtV a e o ppll a lop or'TaxrRefund .rrrrrr.rr.r rrrrrrrr wrrrr,.rr •wrrrrrrrrrrrr r......ru......rrrrrr........ DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval 319FIture o u or ze cer Date gna re o Presiding OrficeF(s) o Taxing Date Unit(s) for refund applications over $500 4 x`11{ ti7. 090.;fIY I } GROOS BANK, N.A. 1.80 K > M CNTERMSES Po box 1330 3836 MEDICAL, Rl71T9 100 PH, 512.641.6161 SAN ANWNIO, WM 78295 SAN AN70N10, TEXAS 76229 86 ~0l/11/0 JULY 28, 19...._ Ot1F.' THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY ONE DOLLARS, X11' F1VE CENTS. O0LLAR8=.~ bl~ r.ITY OF DENTOM-TAX DEPARTMENT ' 215 EAST MCKINNEY 5. or DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ml: L40000g0!:_II'So2...0G?w311• f~'C1fl00LL 155 +f7t70 L80n' u f. S. J ~ of CITY al► DBNTDIw CITY OF DENT( N MUNIOPAS BWUNIOG DENTOK TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING OENTON, TEXAS] ~ , o ~ NUMBER ~pis ~ T +i. NAME 1lAIIf d AOIMI<! , A0~ uwlce N*V1N yt a," AOOIIIIS it cook' - ` fllilMMlEi LOO1 TA► UTILITY T CORD, fIRIMIT= LOOP TAf WMt am. SI uw bM. fMBa1► Siva IrrlEw ENaE 1NN~i Ste. COURT *viK f m IMBE. w#w ft w t 21& 11 W jgmal. I ♦ t ~.TOT rlr TM 1' F KIIP TM RICIIR fOR IR00f op V •►A P1100f OP, ►AYMSNT AND OtPOSET ROUND, 51249Y + - 513517 FORM 1411.7 1 MEMO IOIIM'. 1 tr1 MAKE CITY CNECKB PAYABLE T0; / MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE T0; OP OENTOk TAk bgF1ARTMENi CITY OF DENTON TAX DEPARTMENT h, J r r YOUR CANCEIIEO CNrCK ' fJ) YOYA NECfIM1' YOU, CANCELLjo cNgcx ' Is You* meit" 1 P LEASE RETUAN $ run PLEASE REtURN TNIS TUB WSTN PAYMENT' STUB WITH PAYMENT J MICA CITY Of DAMON, TKXAi PURCHASING DIVISION / 901.8 TEXAS STREET / DENTON, TEXAS 7=1 ME 40RANOUM TQs JOHN MCGRANE, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FROMs JOHN J. MARSHALL, PURCHASING AGENT DATEs OCTOBER 19 1986 SUBJECT: BID # 9634 JANITORIAL SERVICE The City of Denton sent out this bid first as Bid #9643 to receive bids on August 26, 1986. Bruce Hennington revised the specifications from previous bids. We examined the bid and specifications and did not forsee any problems. We received three bids ranging from a low of $96,281.00 to a high of $206,737.00. We had experienced some calls after the Inspection by the bidders but none that we could see necessitated an addendum. When we received the bids we evaluated them and found not only the dollar difference but a big difference in the hours required to perform the duties and the leadman and manager fan hours as well as the price paid per man-hour. We were especially concerned with the supervisory or manager man hours. We then rejected the bids on 09643. 1 have found when the difference In the bids are that great, the bid was not understood the same by the bidders. Therefore they were not being competitive. We then revised the specifications adding an Item for the bidder to list the furnishing of paper goods. We, In calculating and evaluating the rejected bids, probably could furnlsh the paper goods less cost than the Contractor. We received the bids for Bid #9634 on September 23, 1986 at 2:00 p.m. When we again evaluated these bids we found that we indeed could save by the City furnishing the paper goods. We then deducted this from the total and listed the eleven Items shown on the tabulation sheet with bids ranging from $109,176.00 to $1439760.00. After careful evaluating, we recommended the low bid to Pedus Building Services who has been our service for the past two years. I feel this evaluation and recommendation Is fair and just. Mr. B~rralmmerrevidently feels that we can go back to a bid after It has been Wecfn ° ! rnan -o l hours, not. supervision feel the second 1d is a more fair and equal bid as shown by and pr ce. 81711166.8311 D/FW METRO 267-M2 page -2- 10/1/36 I have enclosed some sample pages (3 of 19) of the bids received from Pedus Building Services and Apex Maintenance Services. You will note on the first bid #9643 that Apex's bid called for a total of 13,386 man hours and Pedus 19,980 man hours to complete the years service. When we rebid on bid #9634 the estimated man hours furnished by each bidder for our maintenance is nearer the same. You will also note on page 9 of 19 on bid #9643 for the janitorlal service for the Municipal Building, ' Apex bid 2,308 man hours and Pedus bid 6,381 man hours. Th6n on the corresponding page 9 of 19 on the other Bid #9634, Apex bid less man hours and supervisory time than Pedus did, Apex 3,710 man hours and Pedus 6,296 man hours. I have also enclosed a tabulation sheet for Bid #9643, the first bid. This can be compared to Bid 09634 the second bid. I have not shown the same parts of the other bidders because they were from different contractors/vendors. I I I ! I BID # 9645 1 PEDUS I JANE I APEX I I BID TITLE JANITORIAL SERVICE I BUILDING I KING I MAINTENANCE I I OPENED 0126/86 200 P.M. I SERVICES I I SYSTEMS I I ACCOUNT# I I I I ! I I I I I I I I ---------1-------------I # I GTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I I--------- 1------------------------- I------------- I------------- I------------- I-------------I I. 1 ICITY HALL I 41,496.00 1 52,300.00 1 17,053.00 1 I 2. 1 IPDLICE STATION 1 21,492.00 1 36,561.00 1 16,920.00 1 I 3. 1 IPERSONAEL/D.P. 1 31004.00 I 01772.00 1 41152.00 1 ! 4. 1 (SERVICE CENTER 1 15,576.00 1 23,152.00 I 121946.00 1 1 5. 1 IVEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 110B0.00 1 693.00 i 11306.00 1 I 6. 1 !VISUAL ARTS CENTEk 1 10,000.00 1 25,296.00 1 111BB0.00 I I 7. 1 !CIVIC CENTER 1 11,998.00 1 21,679,00 1 11,200.00 1 I B. ! ;SENIOR CENTER 1 4,764.00 1 61936.00 1 31260.00 1 I o, 1 IDENIA REC CENTER 1 9,156.00 1 14,732.00 1 61042.00 1 ! 10. ! INORTH LAKE REC CENTER 1 61576.00 1 139516.00 1 81042.00 1 I 11. I IENB/TRAFFIC 1 432.00 1 31120.00 1 688.00 1 I I I I i I I I I I I I i I I I I TOTAL ANNUAL BID 1 127,572.00 1 206,757.00 1 961281.00 1 1 I I I I i I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 51 CHECK I YES I YES I YES I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I ~q nutllNMt Qt1► N Gsn~oe, T~~t JANITORIAL SERVICES $10 WORK SHEET (Please complete and submit with aid) PsXrol~ 1 foor- All [4ciii wage Mane "a Total 1. Productive Manhours Szla x wage Rate 0.00 2. Leadwan Manhcurs %LqA~ x wage Rate ;3L8dS.00 3. opscstions Manager Man#ours - 1806 x wage Rate S~„ • $1Q.§16,00 4. paid Leave Manhoursx Wage Rate S- _ $ S . Prof i t-Overhead C'SA4.00 Total Payroll Manhours~ Total Payroll Amount S 80, 0,415, 00 Equipment and Supgliefs for All Facilities_ 10 Janitorial Supplies Cost $1.041.00 2. Plastic beg Liners Cost 0 3, ant Depreciation and Maintenance Cost 49 apex hoods 4 829.00 To a poent and Supplies Cost ,p t?~ 00 Subcontrscting Cost for All Facilities 11 Window Cleaning x 4 = . $3.410.00 2. Carpet Cleaning (Annum 40 Total Bid for All Facilities $ 9~„ 6,,,?81.00 wwww low to- ow 0604 0 t 0tv of 00"00. yen" J.MITORIAL SERVICES RID VORX MET (Please complote and submit with Bid) Pay-roll Wage nho s Rates Totals 1. Productive Manhours x Nage Rate $5.00 • # S . 219, 0 30 xeadman Manhours x wage Rate $1 000 ~0 39 Operation* Manager 396 Manhours x wage Rate ; 6.00 . $ 2.376.00 4. Paid Leave Manhours x Wage Rate 5. Profit-Overhead $=1. 0 Total Payroll Manhours'P Total Payroll Amount(;14.572.00 Muipmnent and Supplies 1. Janitorial Supplies Cost ;137.OQ_ 2. Plastic Bag Liners Cost 594.00 . 3. Depreciation and Maintenance Cost $ 4. Paper Coo s Total 8quipment and Supplies Cost $1,681.00 Subcontracting Cost I. Window CleAninq ) x 4 $800.00 2. Carpet Cleaning (Annual) $800.00 Total Bid for this Building (~='(Y HALL ) $ 17.853.00 'ao "uw»tR ;!~S4 SPECIFICATIONS PW 3 of 19 ft oK+ d OMtos„ TOM 0 3AHITORIAL SERVICES BID WORK SHXXT (Please couplet* and subuit with Aid) Payroll for All facilities Wage Manhou s Ra.%es Totals 1. Productive Manhovzs x Wage Rate ~ SmisL50 2'. Leadaan Manhours x Wage Rate $ 6. 60 SJR- x,00 3. Operations Manager _Rate $ Manhours 680 x Wage iao= 00 4. Paid Leave Manhours x Wage Rate $ 31 Pxolit-Overhead 0~1,00 Total Payroll Manhours 19`5,67.3 Total Payroll Amount $ 100,839.50 Ear meat and Supplies for All Facilities 1. Janitorial Supplies Cost 2. Plastic Bag Liners Cost $ Tam-no r-gulpahmat, Depreciation and Maintenance Cost 0 : -ft pa r Goods ~ 9 Total Equipment and Supplies Cost 5II.125.00 Subcontractini Cost for All Facilities ) z 4 « 0 1. Window Cleaning qqg 2. Carpet Cleaning (Annua 3,41000 Total Bid for All Facilities t 128.868.50 • jig 00 MOM " 9634 'SPECIFICATIONS %P 9 of 19 %I 0"I D"W"Now Cky of Owe. Taw F F • JANITORIAL SsRVSCXS sw MORR 8 or? (Please complete and submit With Did) pay-roll Wagla 33~, Totals 1. Productive Manhours x Naga Rate 2. Leadsan Manhours x Wage Rate = . fry 3. Operationu Manager Manhours 265 x Wage Rate ¢ IAN, oo 41 Paid Leave Manhours x wage Rate $ 5* Profit-Overhead $2 16 . Total Payroll Manhours 3710 Total Payroll Amount $ 3$0447.50 Egui~nt and Supplies 1. Janitorial Supplies cost $ t-17-nn 2. Plastic Bag. Liners Cost $ 594+_00 3. Equipment Depreciation and maintenance cost IrA AA 4. Paper Goods Total Equipment and suppl 4 es cost $ 2,181.00 Subcontracting Cost 1. Window C1eat:ing ( $.200 1 Q0 ) x 4 2, Carpet Cleaning (Annual) $ Room Total Bid for this Building ~I'CY N~~„ ) $236844.5 • N J ONP 3 19 MY of Wneenr7cX" P. 6; ( ~4 JANITORIAL SERVICES BID WORK SKEET (please complete and submit with Bid) Payroll for All Fa - . Wage Manhours Rates Totals productive Manhours 103 x Wage Rate FA . 2', Leadman Manhours J~ x Wage Rate $,-g&_ $,16,24. 3. Operations Manager , 1182 x Wage Rate Manhoure -2.00-- -in•M. 40 Paid Leave hanhours x Wage Rate $ S. Profit-overhead Total Payroll Manhour 1921Q 1 Total Payroll Amount Equipment and SuePlieS for All Facilities_ 11 Janitorial Supplies Cost $38_0. 2. Plaetic Bag Linst s Cost $ 3000. Equipment Depreciation and Maintenance Cost $ . 183 Tottaal..FQauipment and Supplies Cost Subcontracting Cost for All Facilities 11 Window Cleaning ($1 314. ) x4 ■ $ 2. Carpet Cleaning Wnual ~6240,__ Total aid for All Facilities $127*6724 00 WRA401 9643 SPEC11 ICATION6 9 19 PW WNW o., C" of o.M". Tox" JANITORIAL SERVICES DID WORK SHEET (Please complete and submit with Did) Pa rol Wage Manhours Rates Totals 1. Productive Manhours 3393 x Wags Rate $375 $ i2 7 4 te_ 2. Leadman Manho+ rs Z0888 x Wage Rate $5 0~ $ 3. Operation Manager Manhours goQx Wage Rate $9.00 • $~g,,~?;~,,,. 4. Paid Leave Manhours x wage Rate $ • - S. Profit-Overhead $ 1.0506 Total Payroll Manhour 6381 'Total Payroll Amount 2 3i . Muj.paaint and Supplies 1. Janitorial Supplies Cost $ 874. 2. Plastic Bag. Liners Cost 874. .3. E ui ment Depreciation and Maintenance Cost $ 874. 4. aerG 6 Total Equipment and Supplies Cost $ Subcontracting Cost 1. Window Cleaning 280 ) x 4 • 20. 2. Carpet Cleaning (Annual) Total aid for this Building $41,496. ,00 fR SPICIVICATIONS hM 3 Of . Pr►oMNiMOrpwp~Nt City of Dome, Tax" JANITORIAL SERVICES f C~ CC S 0 BID WORK SHEET (please complete and submit with Bid) payroll, tot Ail Facilities Wage Mannhhouurs Rates Totals 1. Productive Marthvurs x Wage Rate rim. ~ 2'. Leadnan Manhours x Wage. Rate Se. A=; fiw. 3. Operations Manager ~ Manhours 1.182 x Wage Rate ar~,10_ 638. 4. Paid Leave Manhours x wage Rate S. Profit-overhead Total Payroll Manhour 19 6 Total Payroll Amount $8Z.0 Equipment and Supplies for All Facilities 1. Janitorial Supplies Cost $3800, 34 Plastic Bag Liners cost $ 380 Equipment Depreciation and Maintenance Cost $1800 Total..Equipment and Supplies Cost $11,4- 00. - Subcont,rsctin~ Cost !or' All Facilities 10 Window Cleaning (3 19310. j x 4 S 5240. Z. Carpet Cleaning (Annua ~55 Totat Bid for All Facilities $119116. ~r~i Cky of DMN*o Temn ~Cv L ` G! -S JANITORIAL SERVICES BID WORK SKEET (Please complete and submit with Sid) Pa ro Wage Han~hours Rates Totals 1. Productive Manhours TIM X Wage Rate $_2 7w = 2. Leadman Hanhours 20m x Wage Rate $~nn 3. Operation Manager Manhours geo. x Wage Rate 4. Paid Leave Manhours x Wage Rate !S. Profit-Overhead Total Payroll Manhours 6296 i Total Payroll Amount jggmont and Supplies_ 1. Janitorial Supplies Cost $ A7a_ 2. Plastic Bag. Liners Cost $ 374--- 3o Equipment Depreciation and Maintenance Cost $ 4. Paper Goods Total Equipment and Supplier Cost $ 2.6220 Suu= actina Cost 1. Window Cleaning ) x 4 = $ 7 *n 2. Carpet Cleaning (Annua $„1- Tota 1 Bid for this Building $37,1791, i i APEX MAINTENANCE SYSTEM 4WI Kellar Spritpt Roo Sake 206 DaSu, Tom 75245 1! ! SEP 2 g (214) 3WI 1 S7 a i. September 26, 1966 City Manager Lloyd Harrell 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 SUVICTt. Janitorial Bid 19654 September 23, 1986 Janitorial Bid 19645 kuSust 7, 1986 Dear Mr. Harrell: As you may be aware the Janitorial Bids for August 81 1986 (19645) were rejected because of a large variance in the lowest bid and the highest bid. After readvertising the bids and adding minimum hours to each building, the new bids supported our previous low bid of $96,281,00 According to Bruce Hennington and John Marshall the minimum hours were guesses, at hest, and would not be enforced as long as the results were clean buildings. Having had experience in tha Janitorial service business and data to support our statement, we are confident that we can fullfill the contract by our original bid of $96,281.00. Knowing these facts, we would bring to your attention the possible waste of city dollars. I have enclosed data to support the current cost per square foot to clean commercial buildings. Please remove this item from the Consent Agenda so that the City of Denton will be best served. Sinc ely, AnAy reamer Coordinator Apex Maintenance System AB/vc Enclosure Cleaning Service. What 2 Do You Look For? As soon as you've orxxuptad your shiny raw quarter, you try to improve productivity by using new equipment, sup. confront a traditional... and andless.,,probtem: Keeping plea and procedures. them clean. If you find a contractor who's banded, insured and willing Normally, of course, arrangements are made ahead of time, to supply relerenoes, char4as are you've found a company With whom do you make them? And what is the oat? eager to protect Its reputation and pain your good will. Traditionally, a landlord contracts for cleaning service for Again in either case, there arse basic elements to be nu entire building, datwrmining specificatlono and considered in your negotistion, They Muds: whedulea. So cleaning coots become part of the grow a Specific areas to be cleaned rental cost for each tenant. a Frequency of service In some lnstancec bowever...often because of your own a Specifications for general cleaning, floor care, special particular requirements... the tenant hires his own cleaning -nuances setCO a C,eaeral conditions, including holideys, insurance The annual cost will be 54.80 cents per smons Wot, Coverage. regardless of whether it's reflected in your ma or Wondering what the typical OD ant per square foot clean. contracted for separately" part of a so-called "net deal" Ing coot looks like from the cleaning contractor's viewpoint? with the landlord. Actual cost will be determined by many They break it down like this; variables, among them size, portitionfrig and frequency of service. Worth bearing in mind is the fact that awn in the Amiss" of Clemslow Cab typical grate deal, in which the landlord is providing clean- s .t Labor Ing service, there's still room to negotlate, By comparing .OE Insurance and tries your cleaning needs with those the landlord intends to .03 Supplles provide, you can often "upgrade" the services at reasonable .OS Supervision costs, In a net deal the tenant should follow certain well- ,08 Selling, general and admin strativis established guidelines to assure satisfactory cleaning -&Q profit service. Best bet, for example, is to look for an established $ 180 and professional uWan►ng contractor. Like most others, cleaning is a competitive business, and good practitioners Typical Cleaning Specs ley sow wash In/etiw p"rtltfon glass and door glass to remove Sweep, dry mop or vacuum all floor eases A resilient, wood or smudge marks. carpet. Remove gum, tar, etc,. adhermq to the floor. Empty and Sweep all visit are", damp wipe all ashtrays and wane baskrs: remove all trash, in Scrub and recondition reeiliem floor areas. eluding bulk items such":sere-s, parking uses or surlier Neetkfir debris, Scrub and recondition nts"W floor areas using bsffable nonslip Dust all horizontal surfaces with treated dun cloth; this includes type floor finish. furniture, files, equipment, blinds, louvres, sec„ that can be Vacuum all ailing and wall air supply and es,'tauet d:flusars or reached without a ladder. grills. Damp wipe all telepho toto including dials and crevices. Spot wash Clean all area and roof drain. to remove smudges, masks and fingerprints from walk, equip. Wash all stairwell landings and treads. meet, doors. partitions, light switches, etc., within reach. Quesh"Iy brush all fabric covered chain with a lint brush, Nigh dust all horizontal and vertical surfaces, not reached in Wash water fountains, chalk boards. cafeteria tables and chairs. nightly cleaning such as pipes, light ftx:uree, door Item e, picture Damp mop &I1 nonrosilwrit floors such as concrete, terraato, from" and other wall hangings. ceramic tile, ac., using deter?ent divinlecfanb Vacuum or dust all books in place. Sweep all steps, sidewalks. exterior landings leading to building. Wash and polish vertical lerrasso or a,arble surfaces. Clean freight and paaunger elevator cabs and landing doors. Damp wash diffuser, vc,ttf, grills, etc., including surround. Empty and damp wipe all waste containers. inq wall or ailing are" that are soiled. Clean 411 wash and rase rooms. ltaaiii-A eiaefJy Clean mirrors, sup dtapensare, shelves, wash basins, sxpos~d Vac, vm blinds, cornices and wall hangings, plumbing, dispenser and disr.,*al container saaerion using Dust all storage are" including delves and Contents such as sup. dstergent d►slntectant and water. Damp wipe all ledges, toilet ply and si,:ck closets., damp mop floor ate". Matta and doors: rpot clean light Strip and refinish oil r"sl" floor areas uurq buffabie non-slip switches. doors and walls. Clean toilets and urinals with floor finish. detergent dstnlaetant, beginning with seats and working down, Arxwlly Pour one ounce of bowl cleaner into urinal "tat cleantnq and do Wash light fixhires, including reflectors. globes, diffu"ata and not flush. Refill all $oap, toilet tissue and towel dtapa+aaa. clean trim. off besebean!" Wash walls in corridors, lobbies, cl"artema, dasonWation Wash all blackkoatcls and clean *room. areas, Cowen", washrooms. wooisity clean ail Yon eel surfaces not attended :o in nightly, weekly, Sow clean Comm pains, quarterly or semt•a niial clo"W4. Wash plans m display windows, bw:dina diractery. entrance wash All inistrior and sss riot glue, bet- sidle, as needed. doom and tramea and show windows, both sides 1r,AK7li'~ O1pD~ l~ ti923[. NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES- PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIRM FOR AN C?FECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bide for the purchase of necessary materials, equ.p- ment$ supplies or services in accordance with the procedure6 of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and re<:ommended that the herein described bids are the equipment, supplies or services responsible as shown sin the "Bid Prop sales' submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials. equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; and WHEREAS, Se Won 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $10,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE-COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals ' attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: ITEM NU014'2t NO. VENDOR AMOUNT "9933"•"-' ALL AFPtIPE Iil1 St l_ M,990 9658 11 UM GKIP Icy _ . Zt 9663 MEN Mmm SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bide, the City aceepta the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specificrtione, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SL►C1'ION III. i That should the City and persons submitting approved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a PAGE ONE formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and award ''ig of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related b W documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That bq the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance- with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as autho;ized heroin. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon .its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 7_ day of f1CICNESt_ _ , 19E6 CITY OF DENTON, TEYA,R ATTEST: UMLOTTE r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PACE TWO DA,rEs October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrel, City Manager SUBJECT: Bid #9647 Water Aleters RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated bidder meeting specification as follows: 1. 5/8" Neptune 19.00 5. 3" Neptune 840.00 2. 1" Neptune 49.00 6. 4" Neptune 1200.40 3. 1 i" Neptune 135.00 7. 6" Neptune 2410.00 4. 2" Neptune 185.00 8. 2" Fire Hyd. Neptune 370.00 Estimated quantities for the year will be $114,990.00. SUMMARY: The lower price offered by Rockwell Is for the old style meter that does not allow for field exchange of damaged registers, and requires that a meter be removed from service dissassembled and reassembled In our shop. This is a time consuming and relativly expensive undertaking, The lower price for item 2 offered by Badger car? :es a qualification concertjing freight that Is not comparable to our r ulrements. Neptune Is the only bidder meeting specifications on Item 5,6 and 7. We require a metered by pass so service can be preformed on the large r.,eters without inter- rupting service to the high volume water users such as Flow Hospital, AMI Medical Center, NTSU, Peterbilt etc. Our evaluation and recommendation is based on compliance with specl- fications, cost, trade-in value, delivery, parts and service. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt These meters are purchased as warehouse inventory and utilized by the Water Meter Field Service Department. FISCAL IMPACT: 1986/87 Budget funds for Water/Sewer inventory purchases Account #710-004-0582-8709 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager bye Approved by: Tom w n a Assistant Purchasing Agent Pur Ing Agent AID N 9647 I NEPIUNE I BADGER I ROCKWELL I DID 717LE WAFER METERS I I i I OPENED 9/4/86 2:00 P.M. I J I ACCOUNT# i ! 1 ! i 1 I -------------i-------------I-----------•-1 N I OTY i ITCH DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 ----I A, i i HER METERS 1, i i5/8" i 19.00 i 19.25 : 18.95 i 2, 1 !1" i 49,00 1 46.60 I 41,50 1 3, !1 112' r 135.00 l 137,62 1 137.00 1 4. 1 12' i 185.00 1 131,54 1 180,00 i 5. 1 13' 1 840,00 1 769.00 1 790.00 1 6. 1 i4" 1 11700.40 1 10170,00 1 11200.00 1 7. i 16' 1 21410.00 1 21290.00 1 21300.00 1 8, 1 7, FIRE HYDRANT METERS 1 370.00 J - 1 390,00 1 i i I I 1 1 8. I I TRADE IN SALVAGE METERS I ' 1. 1 i5/8" 1 4,00 1 3100 1 4.00 1 2. 1 II" 1 8.00 1 8,00 1 7.00 i 3, 1 11 112' 1 15.00 1 12.00 1 12,00 1 4. 1 121 1 20.00 1 18.00 J 20.00 1 1 I I I r ! ' I l 1 lVANDALI2ED REBI57ER i I ! 1 I IEXCHANGE PRICES I I ! I I !5181 1 11.00 1 7.50 1 10.00 1 2. 1 lie I 18.70 1 7.50 1 16.00 1 3. 1 11 1121 i 16.70 1 7.50 1 10,00 1 41 1 12" 1 18.70 1 1.50 1 10,00 1 I 1 I I ! 1 i 1 1 I I D, ! !CHAMBER EXCHANGES PRICES I I I ! 1, I (5/8' 1 11,00 J 8.50 1 9150 1 2. 1 li" I 30,00 1 11.04 1 23.55 1 31 1 It 112' I 73.95 1 21,50 1 83.50 1 4. 1 12` t 101.36 1 44.00 1 102.751 I ! ! I 1 I r J J 1 1 i i DELIVERY I 30 DAY 1 i 30-45 DAY I DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Bid #9653 Power Cable REM194ENDATION. We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification, Cummins Supply, in the amount of $76,201.13 for item 1 and 3 360.00 for Item 2. For a total bid of $790581.13. SUiVARY: This bid is for the purchase of 500 MCM copper wire and 2/0 bare copper wire. This is for replacement of warehouse stock and will he utilized by the Electric Distribution Department. The lessor price offered by Wesco and Priester on item one do not meet our specification. The diameter of the wire is larger and the design Is different. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet PROGRAMS DEFART14ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Warehouse and Elect: is Distribution. FISCAL 111PACT: 1986/87 Budget funds for Working Capital Inventory Account #710-004-0580-8708. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager ared by: Name: Tom D.Snaw Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Ap roved: n NiaNt: Toth D. Shaw Titic 4*i tant Purchasing Agent I I 1 i 1 I BID I 9653 1 RESCO 1 CH!'AINS I TEMPLE 1 GRAYBAR I PRIESTER i NELSON BID TITLE BARE COFFER/POWER CABLE I I SUPPLY 1 INC. 1 ELECTRIC 1 SUPPLY I ELECTRIC 1 OPENED 9/16/86 2100 P.M. i i 1 i I 1 1 ACCOUNT# I i i i I 1 1 ' f 1 I 1 ».1------------- 1------------- I-------------I------------- I-------------1-------------1 4 1 QFY i ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDDR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 -...I».-.--...I.»__.»»_..__..-._..»..-°-I------------- 1------------- I----- I------------- I-----------.- i 1 I 1 1 i 1 I 1 I, 121,315' 1500 MCM COPPER CABLE i 3.40 1 3.575 I 3,63 1 4.2; 1 3.425 1 NB 1 i 1 manfacture I PHILLIPS 1 CABLEC I CABLEC I CABLEC 1 NONE I I i 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 2. 18400' 1210 BARE COPPER CABLE i .415 i 0,40 1 0.43 1 C.45 1 .4061 1 0.43 1 I 1 leanfecture I NEVRING I SERVICE 1 SERVICE I HOUSTON f SERVICE I VIACOH i I i I I I 1 ' I 1 i 1 1 I 1 i I 1 I DELIVERY 1 70/21 1 56128 1 56/10 1 2B/28 1 84/64 1 136 1 I 1 I f 1 3 I 1 i f 1 I I I I I ' I ' 1 I I I I I I I ' DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID# 9658 FIRWING Or PAWS " RECREATION iMCL'H.R1;'S RECO144ENDAIION: We recannend this lbd be awarded to the lowest evaluated bid for a change to three color, as recanmended by Steve Brinkren, to Group Graphics for printing 30200 40 page brochure at $7,343.80 each for the estimated yearly total of $22,031.40. SUIVARY: This bid was sent out earlier which was not clear to sorm bidders or at Jeast they did not understand fiat we wanted. That bid was rejected and this bid was received as shown on the tabulation sheet. The using Department has evaluated this bid according to their expected needs and have recannended the evaluated low bid, BACKGROUND: „Tabulation sheet Memo - Steve Brinkmn, Parks Department PROGRAMS, DEPARIMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The recreation actJvlties of the Parks and Recreation Department FISCAL I1iPACT: Budgeted resource funds No additional impact on General Fund Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V, Harrell City Manager Prepared by: P me: John J. Marshall, C.Y.M. tle: Purchasing Agent Approved: 0"-Z I ith ae:,,j n J. Marshall, C.P.M. 1)09; Purchasing hgent 1 I 1 I DID I 9658 WE88 I GROUP I I DID TITLE PRINTING-PARKS BROCHURES I k I GRAPHICS I i OPENED 9/30/06 200 P.M. : ASSOCIATES 1 ; I AUCOUNTI 1 I 1 ! l I i-------------1-------------I-------------i I I O1Y I ITEM DESCRIPTION i VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR i ----i--------- i------------------------- 1---- •1-------------I----- --I I. 132•FAGES 11987 WINIERISFRING 1 41800,00 1 5,137,00 1 1 140 PAGES 1 1 61210,00 I 61360.00 1 I i 1 I I 1 1 2, 132 PAGES 119B7 SUMMER 1 41080,00 1 51137.00 1 1 140 PAGES 1 1 61210.00 1 61380.00 1 1 1 I i i 1 3. 132 PAGES 11987 FALL 1 4,880.00 1 51137,00 1 I 140 PAGES 1 I 64210.00 I b,3BU,U0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! I 4. 1 !TYPESETTIN6 - PER HOUR 1 30.00 1 30,00 1 1 :PASTE UP - PER HOUR 1 20,00 1 20.00 1 : i I 1 1 51 1 !EXTRA COLOR - PER PAGE 1 10.25 1 450.00 1 I ! ! I 17.00 I LOT i I 6. i 11 - COST OF SOLICITATION 1 .195 1 .25 1 : 1 i ! i I I 7. 1 ICALENDAR DAYS 1 13 1 14 i I 1 i : i I I ti CITY 00ENTON, TEXAS Civic Cantor / "t t. McKinmy / Denton, Tsxss mot M E M O R A N D U M TOt John Marshall, Purchasing Agent FROMt Steve Brinkman, Director, Parks and Recreation DATE, October 1, 1986 SUBJECTt Printing Bid It is our intent to enlarge our brochure starting in the summer to 40 pages and go to three colors to make the brochure more attractive. If you consider a 40 page brochure with three colors, the bids aret Group Graphics $6,830/issue Webb & Associates $6,890/issue Group Graphics would provide the lowest cost in this instance. We also 4eel that Group Graphics has given us a quality product and met all their deadlines in the past. They have also demonstrated an ability to sell the ads which will help to lower our cost of the brochure. The difference in cost between the two bidders is so slight that we feel it would save us many hours of our time by going with Group Graphics who knows car needs rather than Webb & Associates. Stev Br n n MEM00739 Denton Parks and Recreation / Denton, Texas / 1017) 000.8570 FIT 1_ CITY COUNCIL REPORT DATE: 10/07l86 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BIDN 9663 PNBIlANM IRI~C M RECOWIENDATION: We recamxnd this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder Select Arbulance in the amount of $38,498.00. This bid is for a new 1987 one ton cab/chassis and a rervinafactured Mobil Intensive Care Unit. The cooperation between Select Pr, ,lance, City of Dallas and the City of Denton makes this transaction very advantageous to the City of Denton. We are very pleased to bring this proposal to the Council for your consideration, The estimated delivery schedule is two weeks. SUMMARY: This bid is for the replacement of and an old arrbulance with a remanufactured "box" and a new cab/chassis. The bid prices were determined by the City of Dallas in April of 1986 on their bid #1094. They bid 6 units plus options for 10 additional units. Through an arrange- ment with the City of Dallas and Select Prrbulance we are able to "piggy- bank" their bid as presented and accepted by the Dallas City Council June 4, 1986. The savings involved are approximately $8,000 and 120 days delivery by utilizing the arrangement. The bidding process for the City of Dallas mett all legal requirement:; far the City of Denton. BACKGROUND: Tabutation sheet - PROGRAMSt DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Motorpool Replacement Fire Department FISCAL 111PACT: 1986/87 Budget Funds Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Pr aced by: Name: Tan D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: ~i(~a►ei John J. Marshall, C.P.M. I 1 I I ! 1 RID 4 1 SELECT 1 EAGLE 1 COLLIN I i BID TITLE AMBULANCE-REIIANFACTURE 1 AMBULANCE I EMERGENCY 1 AMBULANCE I 1 OPENED 4130/86 CITY OF DALLAS 1 i 1 I ; ACCOUNT$ MOTDRFOOL 86187 1 I 1 I I 1 1 ! I 1 ! ' --••--------------°----------I-------------I---•--------- I I-------------I 1 1 QTY 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR I VENDOR ! VENDOR I VFNDDR 1 VENDOR I -.--I---------- 1-------------------------I------------- I------------- I-------------- I------------- 1-------------1 1. 1 1 1REMANFACTURE KNIT 1 22,896.00 1 28,678.00 1 15,600.00 1 1 ! 2. 1 1 !CAB CHASSIS 1 151600,00 1 14,727,(10 1 25,000.00 1 1 ! 1 ! I I 1 1 I 1 ! I I 1 ! I f I I TOTAL 1 38,498.00 1 43,405.00 1 40,800.00 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I ! I I I I 1 ! I 1 f 1 I I I 1 UY2s~ . _ NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; and WHEREAS, Section 2,36 (f) of the Code of Ordinancus requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $10,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the construction of, _ public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita- tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bide: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 9631 3.V, E8ffiT.~'/TF M" FD ASYTIA _S S 9a~9l~ jn 9643 DIGi . b16.99s.an 96 /1l1! 1115 CWTPOMM. lla.4to.ao 29.996.00 L. - gn ill MAIN CU4 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above compstitivo bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction o.f such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms conditions plans and specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein. PAGE ONE SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids avid authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7 day of CCTCM 1986 Y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CR=TTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON,jTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: I PAGE TWO DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Codncil FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 9631 LCCP 288 UTILITY CRC6 S1NGS SANITARY SEWER PARTICIPATION RECO101ENDATION: WE REC0445ND THIS PARTICIPATION BE APPFZ7M FZR THE LOAEST DID BE'TWE'EN THE 10" AND 18" SANITARY SEWER LINE BID BY DIQMR.SCN 02NSTRLCTICN OJ. ItC. IN TF£ AM: NT CF $30, 814.11. THE O N TRI CT WILL BE W17H J V STRANGE, TFASLEY ROAD ASSCCIATES, THRCLGi BRYAN BLIP:, P.E. SUMMARY: THIS BID INaJXE!D SEVERAL CROSSINGS WITH WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ETC. AT SC&E DIMYZ4r LCCATIONS. RAE ARE CfLY OMIDERI% THIS (NE AT THE PRESENT TIM!?. THERE WERE SEVEN BIDS, A GOM REFRESENTATION, CN THIS PROJECT. THE DEVELCIM, ENGINEER AWYCM TFE am pas AND THIS PROJECT IS WFARI% 0:7vI'I.ETICN. BACKGROUND: TAAULATICN SHEET _ UP I L I TY R8GN&UDq'r ICN AND UTILITY BARD REOJvTvP,TOgT ION PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: CAPITAL imiuv 4FNCS PRDJEcT -UTILITIES FISCAL 111PACT: 624-008-0471-9138 THERE IS N:) ACLIITICNAI. IMPACT CN THE COAL FtM Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: • ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. itle: Purchasing Agent Approved: a John J. Marshall; C.P.M. Title; Purchasing Agent I 1 I I 1 1 I I PID # 9631 1 DICKERSON 1 B t F I IDELA 1 L,E, 1 fENBUSCN I LONELL I C 41 W I CIRCLE C 1 PID TITLE LOOP 286 f11!U IY CR055iNG'CONSTAUCi10N 1C-0NSTRUCTION ;CONSTRUCTION 1 DLLEkIA 1 LXAVATING 1 B. ! UTILITY ;CONSTRUCTION 1 OPENED 6124186 2:00 P.M. I L6. u1Cl 1 CO. I CO. I 1 CO. ALLISON 1 1 CO. 1 pCCOUtIT# 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 . 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' - 1-----------_.1..--° -i------------- I------------' 1----•---------1-------------1 ----------~---__--------I # 1 OfY {TEN DESCRIPTION I VENDOR VENDOR I VENDOR I VENCOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR i 1 I•------ 1 ~ ~ 1 I 1 , I 1 ' 1 ~ 1 1 , I I I i 0EENFIELD OFFSITE SEVER 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [DIFFERENCE 10° TO 18" 1 30,814,11 1 811485,i'0 1 65,233.36 1 39,156,90 1 NB 1 51,564,12 J 61,460,44 1 41,302.52 1 1 1 1 1 I I i ! 1 I I 1 1 1 1 i I I 1 1 I I ! 1 1 1 ! I ! I i 1 I 1 I I I I I ! I I 1 i I I 1 1 I t 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 i 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 i I DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER BID OPENING, BID #9631, GREENFIELD WOOD SCHOOL SI'Z'E, OVERSIZE SEWER LINE, OWNER, TEASLEY ROAD ASSOCIATION. RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board recommends to the City Council approval of the lowest difference of $300814,11 (18" sewer vs 10" sewer) as the City's participation. SUMMARY Bids were opened June 24, 1986, and the results are as follows: City Part. 18" SS 10" SS 1811-10" SS Dickerson Constn. $124,387.75 $930572.64 $309814.11 L1; Deletka Constn. 1639268.46 124,111.50 39,156.96 Circle C Constn. 128,535.60 810233.08 47,302.52 Lowell B. Allison 141,346.02 89,781.90 51,564.12 C$W Utility Constn. 214,090.96 1520630,52 619460.44 Idela Constn. 1899458.40 124,225.04 65,233.36 B$F Constn. 1919404,00 1099919.00 810485.00 The Public Utilities Board recommends approval of the lowest difference of $30,814.11, the bid of Dickerson Construction. BACKGROUND The City Council approved on August 19, 1986, the oversize agreement from 18" to 10" sewer. The devel- oper needs a 10" sewer line whereas future development in the surrounding drainage area may require an 18" sanitary sewer. PROGRAMS, GROUPS OR DEPARTMENTS AFFECTED City of Denton Municipal Utilities, City of Denton, Developers and the citizens. 0231n;7 ,Greenfield Wood School Site Oversize Sewer Line Page 2 FISCAL SUMMARY City's estimated share approved August 14, 1986, along with oversize agreement: $790280.00 City's share based on bid opening (this request) $309814.11 Source of funds: Sewer Bond Funds- 624-008-0471-9138 Note: It may be noted that due to competition among contractors, the City's share is well below the approved estimate. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Harrell Prepared by: City Manager , CD,...e *L,--. David am Assistant Director of Utilities Water/Wastewater Divisions Approved: K. E. Nelson Director of Utilities Attachments: Bid Tabulation Location map PUB Minutes 9/24/86 0231n:N I r OVERSIZE $Ewalt tee t OYEABIZE sa:wER 04 7.1 . L.A too r. MINUTHS PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD September 14, 1986 btat[IERS PRESEN'r: Chairman Roland Laney, John Thompson, Edward Coomes, Kenneth Frady, Nancy Lloyd, Lloyd Harrell, It. E. Nelson STAFF PItliS6NT: John McGrane, C. David Liam, Ernie rullos, Mark McDaniel, Glenn Jaspers 0TI1 I(S PRESENT: David Guyot,, Stanley Arwbruster, Dr. Littlefield Service Center Training Itoom 6:U0 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. Regular Agenda f ~Q 10. LONSIDER BID UPENING BID #9631 OVERSIZE ;EIV;R LINE AT THE I(~ U ' fF L MOO Si:'-")()L " . Ham explained that the staff recommends approval of the lowest difference of $3U,814.11 as the City's participation in the oversize sewer line. Coomes moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the low bid of Dickerson Construction in the amount off $3U,814.11. Thompson second. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. DATE:October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL RETORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Bid #9643 C.I.P. Utilities Loop 288 30" Watermain REC0191ENDATIOM: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder of Dickerson Construction Co. in the amount of $616,985.00. SU VARY: This bid was advertised and notices were sent to twenty-five Contractors. We had thirty-two sets of plans picked up and received eleven bids ranging from $616,985,00 to $963,796.10. We feel that we received an excellent bid for this project. BACKGROUMD: Tabulation Sheet and Utility Department recommendation and Utility Board Minutes. PROGRAMS, DEPARTHENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: C.I.P. Projects FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Y. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: a 4Joh&nMarshal l Tit Purchasing Agent Approved: 969:Qkt4z~ a Jo fin Marshall Tjt1t1 Purchasing Agent ! I I I I I I I I I I BII I 9643 ! C F N 1 PAR I OSCAR I SABER I PILL I IES-COM I CALVERI I CNAIIIIEL I BICP[OWN 1 JAY-MAR iAPChIIECILIAL BID TITLE NP UTILITIES LOOP 2B8 I UTILITIES ICONSIRIMURS 1 RENDA I DEVELOPMENT I NAtELV00D I UIILIIf I PAVING ICUNSIRUCIIDN ICONSIRUCIION 1 COOP WILITIES OFERED 8119106 7100 f'.M, I I I CDNIP4CIIN6 I COOP t INC ! ! I CD. I CO. I IINC. ACCOUNII 622-000.041-9139 I I 1 CO. I I I I I r r I I r I i 1 I I r 1 I I - - - ,-°.-------r----------•--r-------------I....... .._..-.I------------- t------------- 1--- ----....I---------_---I------------- 1------------- 1 I DIY I IEEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDDN NEW - I.......... I............ -------------I-------------r-------------I............. I------------- I------------- I--------- - l------------- I------------- I------------- 1 I----.------- I ! I I 1 I I I I I I I I TIOIAL I 827,445.40 t 963,196.10 1 982,915.00 1 713,318.50 1 100,072.40 1 700,135.00 1 951,910,00 1 716,371.25 1 616,985,00 1 874,745.00 1179,794.00 I i I I I I I I I r I I r ! I PIP POND I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I YEA I YES I YES IVES I I I I I 1 ! I 1 ! I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I t r I I i I I I s I 1 I I I 1 I I i I 1 I t I I I I ! t I . DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER BID OPENING, BIb #9643, LOOP 288 McKINNEY TO UNIVERSITY DRIVh 30" WATER LINE. RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board and Purchasing Department recommend to the City Council approval of the lowest qualified bid of Dickerson Construction Company in the amount of $616,985. SUMMARY Bids were opened Aug. 14, 1986, and the results are as follows: Dickerson Constn. Celina, Tx $616098S.00 Bill Hazelwood Inc., Sherman'Tx 700,072.40 Tex-Con Utility, Garland, Tx 700,135.00 Saber Devel. Co., Dallas Tx 713,318.50 Channel Constn., Lake Da h as, Tx 7760371.25 Arch. Utility FW Tx 7790794.00 C$W Utility, besoto, Tx 8270445.00 Jay Mar Corp., Denton, Tx 874,745.00 Oscar Randa Const. Roanoke, Tx 892,945.00 Calvert Paving, Denton, Tx 9510910.00 Bar Constn., Lancaster, Tx 963,796.10 The Public Utilities Board recommends the approval of the lowest bid of Dickerson Construction in the amount of $616,985. BACKGROUND This is an approved 1986 CIP project. In FY 1986- 2411/20" water line was installed from the Water Plant to Loop 288 and north on Loop 288 to McKinney Street. In continuation with this project, in FY 1986, a 30" water line is being proposed from McKinney to US 380 on Loop 288. Anticipating the growth of Lakeview development and the proposed new Water Plant in the north part of town, and to extend services to the ETJ in the future, the Utilities Staff has upgraded the line size from 20" to 3011. In addition, it will also help reduce distribution loss in the system so as to efficiently pump 30 MGD in conjunction with the proposed Water Plant upgrade (to 30 MGD) 0231n:11 Loop 288 hcXinney to University Drive 30" Water Line. Page 2 In FY 86, budgeted amount for the 20" water line is $350,000, whereas the low bid for the proposed 30" water line is $616,985.00. In addition to the line being upgraded to 3011, the routing was also modified to meet field/easement situations, involving 1400 LF of extra length of pipe and bore across Loop 288 and US 280. PROGRAMS, GROUPS OR DEPARTMENTS AFFECTED City of Denton Municipal Utilities, City of Denton, Developers and the citizens. ' FISCAL SUMMARY The Public Utilities Board and Utilities Staff feel that the low bid can be accommodated for the following reason: In FY 860 $5000000 (water bonds) had been budgeted for oversize water lines based on anticipated growth and proposed oversize agreements. However, many oversize agreements have not yet taken place due to lack of interest from developers. Approximately $300,000 remains unspent in FY 86 in this category, which could be used for this project. In addition, as a followup r.genda, the Pu W c utilities board is recommending approval of a change order to the lowest qualified bid to change the specified 30" gate valves to 30" butterfly valves at a net savings of $41,250. (refer to followup agenda). The fiscal impact is as follows: FY86 budgeted Loop 288 Water Line $350,000.00 FY86 Oversize Water Line Unspent budgeted amt, $3000000.00 TOTAL FY 86 Available Water Bonds $6509U00.00 Recommended award (low bid) $616,985.00 Source of funds: Water bonds- 623-008-0461-9138 0231n:12 I Loop 288 McKinney to University Drive 30" Water Line. Page 3 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd arre Prepared by: City Manager avia Ham Assistant Director of Utilities Water/Wastewater Divisions Approved: E. M son Director of Utilities Attachments: Bid Tabulation Location map PUB Minutes 9/24/86 0231n:13 r PROJECT LOCATION 1 11 Am . I ti• urn 1' I MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD September 24, 1986 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Roland Laney,, John Thompson, Edward Coomes, Kenneth Frady, Nancy Boyd, Lloyd Harrell, R. E. Nelson STAFF PRESENT: John MrGrane, C. David Ham, Ernie Tullos, Mark McDaniel, Glenn Jaspers vmhRS PRESENT: David Guyot, Stanley Armbruster, Dr. Littlefield Service Center Training Room 6:0U p.m. to 11;30 p.m, Regular Agenda 7. CUNSIDER BID UPENING, BI ~Y63 LOOP 288 McKINNEY TO UNIVERSITY DRIVE WATER L Ham explained that this is an approved 1986 CIP project upgrading the line size from 20" to 30". Utility staff recommends approval of the low bid of Dickerson Construction in the amount of $616,985, Thompson moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the low bid of Dickerson Construction in the amount off $616,985. Frady second. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Bid 09650 C.I,P. Utilities Section F-JOrU3, WI DSCR, BELL, MifW, I&S7WAY STREETS RECOIiKENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder Albenesius Contractors for the total amount of $118,410.00. 5UIM1A This bid was picked up and sent to some twenty or more Contractors. We received seven bids ranging from the low bid of $118,410.00 to $278,391.00. Four of these bids were under $150'9000.00.as'shown on the tabulation sheet. Each of the bidders meet the bid require- ments and specifications. Mr.Albenesius has been awarded several contracts from the City prior to this one, and we have found him to be a reliable Contractor. This bid is for water lines on Joyce Lane, Windsor Drive, Bell Avenue, Mingo Road and Westway Street. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Utility Board Minutes. PROGRAMS, DEPART14ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: C.I.P. Project FISCAL IIiPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: e:' John Marshall tle: Purchasing Agent Approved: i M, J hn rshall Title; Purchasing Agent 1 I 1 ! i 1 1 ! BID I WO I DICKERSON 1 JOE 1 CALVERT 1 JAY-MAR I E.L, 1 AL6ENESIU9 ; CHANNEL I DID TITLE CIP UTILITIES SEC. F !CONSTRUCTION I BENSON 1 PAVING ]CONSTRUCTION ! DALTON !CONSTRUCTION i i OPENED 9118186 2100 P.M, I I I ! I i ACCOUNII I I i ! i i ! 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ----------------------------------------I-------------I------------- 1-------------I-------------I-°-----------i---------- 11 QTY ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR I VENDOR ; VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDDR 1 VENDOR ; 1. 1 iJOYCE B" 1 91545.00 i 154350,00 ! 91720.00 ; 10,302 00 I 11,217.45 1 7,048100 i 18,478,00 1 1 I I ! i I 1 I I 2, 1 1NINDSDR B" i 36,064,00 1 36,332,00 1 31,592.00 1 361740,OD 1 45,904,20 1 27,829.00 1 ]0,092.00 1 i 1 I 1 1 i i i 1 I 3. i ]BELL 12" 1 10,681,00 1 13,308,00 1 11,225.00 1 721209,00 1 16,710,00 i 81111.00 ! 24,314,00 1 I 1 I I ! I i ! I 1 4. i iMINOU 8" 1 379329.50 1 49,925,00 ! 33,757,00 1 36,080,00 1 40,022.00 1 38,320,00 1 74,492,00 1 ! I I I I I ! I ! I 51 1 INESTWAY B" 1 44,236.00 1 49,746100 1 42,704.00 t 48,956.00 1 62,757,10 1 36,502100 1 901235.00 I 1 i 1 I i i 1 I T I 1 I 1 i 1 I 1 1 I I i TOTAL 1 137,855,50 1 7641741,00 1 128,998.00 1 144,187.00 ; 176,610.75 I 118,410.00 1 2181391.00 1 1 i I I I i 1 1 i ! i i I I i i i 1 1 1 IBID BOND I YES I YES I YES 1 YES I YES I YES I YES I 1 f i I ! I i i I i ' i 1 ; I 1 1 I I 1 1 MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD September 24, 1986 hiF.MBEItS 1%bSEN'l': Chairwait Noland Laney, John Thompson, Edgard Coomes, Kenneth Frady,' Nancy Boyd, Lloyd Ilarrell, It. E. Nelson • S'rAFF PRESEN'r: John McGrane, C. David Ham, Ernie Tullos, Mark McDaniel, Glenn Jaspers U'1'111iRS PRESENT: David Guyot, Stanley Armbruster, Br. Littlefield Service Center Training Room 6:00 p.m. to 11:30 p.ni. Emerge icy Agenda Item CONSIDER BID OP0iNG FQK WATEIt LINE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NULL01111 G 5'1Kbh1'S: JU CE ANis, WINDSOR BELL, b11NGU ND V) W 11r Ham explained that his was an approved 1986 CI? project, and that these improvements wiII reduce maintenance cost, increase flow, and reduce distribution line loss. Staff recommends the low bid of Albenesius Contracting in the amount of 4118, 410. Coomes moved ~o recommend to the City Council approval of the low bid of Albenesius Contracting in the amount off $118,41U. doyd second. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. ...SiwY.+. u. ..r#h ...o o-. .l sa _ w..1.G.:.:~.r ...r a ..:f.+_. . Y'~ + . aa_w..+..MNwrlr.n.~.++1W'.. .r- ay,. Y DATE: October 7, 1986 f CITY COUNCIL REPORT I TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Bid #9651 Participation Holbert/Wyatt Oversize Watermain RECOKIENDATION: We recommend this participation bid be awarded to the lowest difference between a 16" watermain and the 8" watermain, of $29,836.00. SU14MARY: As there was some discussion about what size to be built and the size required, the bid was divided into three parts. Bidding the cost of 16", 12" and 8" watermain, the low differ- ence between the 8" required and the 16" oversize is the amount considered. The low amount is $29,836.00, this is for the participation only. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet and Utility Board Recommendation. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Utility Department FISCAL I18'ACT: There is no impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City hanager prepared by: ohn -Marshall itle: Purchasing Agent Approved: a ; John Marshall T41 o Purchasing Agent DID 1 901 1 JAY-HAR I DICKERSON I CRAWFORD i 1 1 HID TITLE PARIIEIPATE-HOLHERTIWYATTICONSTRUCTION ;CONSTRUCTION i UTILITY 1 i i OPENED 914786 2000 P.M. ; INC ! CO. ICONSTRUCTION 1 i i ACCOUNT$ I i i INC. i i ; i------------- I------------- i-------------I N i QTY 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION i VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR ; - -i -----I------------------------- I------------- I------------- i I------------- i-------------I 1. I ;TOTAL FOR 16' WATERLINE 1 67,516.00 1 70,760.00 i 72,596.05 1 J ; i i i I I I I i 21 1 !TOTAL FOR 12' WATERLINE 1 49,400.00 i 54,400.00 1 40,829.51 1 i i I I I 1 I I i i 3. 1 IIOTAL FOR 0' WATERLINE 1 371680.00 1 31,665.00 1 NB i 1 I i i 1 I i 1 CITY !OF ^F4TW -PARTICIPATION I I I i I I i 41FFERENCE 16' TO 8' 1 29,B36,00 1 39,095,00 1 NO I I { 1 i I I 1 I I 1 f i I i I { 1 i 1 i i I { i 1 ; I I { i I I I I , sr~:~t .'.n aw ,.{,n ..•-+..y..v.'.a+^asv-w r. ......eM,r v. a..... r wrxw r. ..r.r DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM RECEI 3 J 1936 TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER BID OPENING, B11)((09651, OVERSIZE WATER LINE- S" TO 16"0 HOLBBRT-WYATT ADD4TION. RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board recommends to the City Council approval of the lowest difference of $29,836 as the City's participation in the oversize water line from 8" to 16". SUMMARY Bids were opened Sept. 40 19869 and the results are as follows: City Part. 16" WL 8" WL 1611- 8" WL Dickerson Constn. $67,516,00 $37,380,00 $290836.00 Jay Mar Corp. 70,760.00 31,665.00 39,095.00 The Public Utilities Board recommends the approval of the difference of $29,836 as the City's participation. BACKGROUND The City Council approves August S, 1986, the oversize agreement from 8" to 16" with Holbert-Wyatt Addition— the developer. In order to serve the area containing this development and future developments in the area, a 16" water line is required. The proposed water line extends from west of Pockrus Road to and across development frontage on I35E. PROGRAMS, GROUPS OR DEPARTMENTS AFFECTED City of Denton Municipal Utilities, City of Denton, Developers and the citizens. FISCAL SUMMARY The fiscal impact is as follows; 0231n:14 *F"`.'.yp°°c`y~*ic' ara,{p.~q.f.w+r+µATkw4.i~•... -?..r- . ...:ar:rr.~--.v...... . .a _ .xw Consider Hid Opening, Hid ♦96S1 Oversize Water Line--8" to 16" Holbert-Wyatt Addition, Page 2 PY86 estimate as approved 8/5/86 $160191.OU Actual difference per bids (this request) $299836.00 In FY 86, $SOU,000 has been budgeted for various oversize water lines, Source of funds: Water bonds- 623-008-0461-9138 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd arre prepared by: City Manager 6avid am Assistant Director of Utilities Water/Wastewater Divisions Approved: R, E. Nelson Director of Utilities Attachments: Bid Tabulation Location map PUB Minutes 9/27/86 0231n:15 *W;t •:.:5 ~"°v-r ry. r~aa.. 7~. :A TT ADONTION all DOFF SITE OVERSIZE WATER LINE a' to ta• 0 • ~ f f a f• ~ t 1 , v ie 1 State 0' R RATA; OVERSIZE All NUTL'S PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD September 24, 1986 L~iDIBBRS PKESENT1. Chairman (bland Laney, John Thoiupson, Edward Coouies, Keunet.h Frady,' Nancy Boyd, Lloyd Harrell, It. E. Nelson - STAFF PRESENT: John McUrane, C. David Main, Ernie Tul'los, Mark McDaniel, Glenn Jaspers OTHERS PRESENT: David Guyot, Stanley Armbruster, Dr. Littlefield Service Center Training (loom 6:00 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. Regular Agenda it /q~ 9. CONSIDER BID UPEN1NG BID 89651 OVERSIZE WATER LINE AT THE U k,- WYATT . Ham explained that the staff recommends approval of the lowest difference of $29,836 as the City's participation in the oversize water line. Boyd moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the low bid of Dickerson Construction in the amount off $29,836. Cuomes second. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously. w w .r_ti'.-e..I:.a, . 4NwYa-.+ ~++..k4:. _..r.w .-....._...,w_ _-y.+-.....+.i.......... r; Pw+.r~.'.w.: _......i. . DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Bid 09655 Painting Peach Street Water Tank RECUIifNpATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder Don Owen Painting Contractors, Inc, in the amount of #35,500.00. SU VIRY: The painting of this tank was bid earlier and we received only one bid, which was rejected by the staff. We then revised our %eci~~ications, selected nine prospective vendors and sent the bid out. We again received only one bid. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet _ PRO(LRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Water Production Fi5CAL 111PACT: Budget Account #620-008-0460-8301 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: am : John Marshall Tit) Purchasing Agent Approved: *Oa:- John Marshall Tft Purchasing Agent b 1 ' 1 I 1 ' DID 0 4655 1 DUN L, I SHOINELL 1 ! 810 TITLE PAINTING PEACH ST TANK 1 LINEN I 1 I OPENED 9123186 200 P.M. i i I ACCOUNT$ 620-000-0460-8301 1 i i i ' I i ----------------------------------------1------------- I 1 OTY 1 1TEH DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR ! VENDOR I VENDOR i - 1-------•--1-------------------------I-------------1 - i-------------1 1 1 1 i 1 1. I ]SAND BLASTI'IG 1 331000.00 1 NB I I 1 I 1 i I 1 2. 1 ISTRUCTURAL REPAIR 1 29500.00 1 i ! 1 [ I I MURANCE 1 { 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I TOTAL 1 35,500.00 1 ! I I I i { I I I ISTART DATE 1 10 DAY ARD I I I 1 1 I I I I I [BID BOND I YES i 1 1 I I I I t I 1 1 I I 1 i DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Bid #9654 Janitorial Service RECOI#iERDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, including all eleven locations, to Pedus, for the yearly total amount of $109,176.00. Paid monthly. SUMMARY: This bid was first bid tend received on August 26, 1986 but was rejected, because evidently some items were not clearly understood and there were different interpreta- tions, therefore a big difference in prices. We re-bid and received three bids as shown, We will be furnishing the paper goods as we have in the past. The tabulation shows the totals without the papergoods, BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet (Item 1-11 totals underlined) PROGRAMS, DEPART14ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Building Maintenance FISCAL 11WACT: Budgeted item 1986-87 F^spectfully submitted: Lloyd Y. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: ~~Na o n Marshall Title: Purchasing Agent Approved: a oh Marshall I I I 1 ~ 1 RID 1 9654 1 CONIRACI I HARRIS 1 APEX 1 PIOUS 1 ! BID TITLE JANITORIAL SERVICES I CLEANING I BUILDINU I t 1 t OPENED 9123/06 2:00 F.M. 1 I 1 1 1 1 ACCOUNTI I I 1 I 1 I I 1 ! 1 I -----------------------1------------- 1------------- 1-------------- 1------------- 1----------- I I Illy 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 -1- I------------------------- I------------- I-------------t------------- 1------------- 1-------------1 1. I !CITY HALL 1 24,191.20 1 1 22,644.50 1 31,179,00 1 1 2. 1 IPOLICE 1 15,413.00 1 I 22,475,50 1 17,892,00 1 I 3. 1 - 1PERSOIIHELID.P. 1 61125,00 ; 1 71054,00 1 4,260.00 1 4, 1 !SERVICE CENTER 1 14,217.00 1 1 16,887.70 1 13,176.00 1 ! 5. I 1VEHICLE HAINTENANCE 1 21217.00 1 1 21212.50 1 1,020.00 I 1 6. 1 IVISUAL ARTS CENTER 1 11,946.00 1 1 111837.50 1 7,848,00 I 1 7. 1 !CIVIC CENTER 1 10,716.00 1 1 12,206.50 1 9,924.00 I 1 9. 1 ISENIOR CENTER 1 8,182,00 1 1 71150.00 1 41164.00 1 ! 91 1 IDENIS REC CENTER 1 91947.00 1 1 91865.00 1 7,764.00 1 1 10. 1 1NDRIH LAKE RU CENTER 1 91947.00 I 1 91212.00 1 51184.00 1 I It. I {ENOINEERIND/TRAEPiC 1 1,635.00 1 1 11213.00 1 765.00 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 I TOIAL 1 111,546.00 1 143,760.00 1 122,1340.00 1 109,176.00 1 1 1 I 1 t i I I I 1 !BID BOND I YES I MORE I YES I YES I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I ' U92 36 NU, AN OADINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUEDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMP'riNG SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PRUVIDINU FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding $IO,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of public calamity whore it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of ttie city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and WUKRKAS, Section 2,36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures oF. more than X10,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, ttie following emergency purchases of mn!:erials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR A1,10UNT 75177 ~OUTI@QN 11Y(jjOFLCIW S 13,562.1!' _ 75209 3, S, EC11.ItPA tff 00- 13,566.48 73320 ,1 1 5. EculPhr.K Co. 14.092.23 75600 FWM QO _ 226A45.00 SECTION it, That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids. DA,r-r AMR SECTION LL. That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the amounts ~.nerein stated, such emergency purchases :ding in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids. SECTION I11. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7 day of _ qCT1986. Y TE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: UAREOTU , CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAHL DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTJN, TEXAS BY: DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: P.O. #75177 to Southern Hydroflow RECOI,VIENDATION: We recommend this emergency Purchase Order for the purchase of a replacement for the 100HP Starbelt Series 5000 Rotary Blower for the amount of $13,569.14. SUMFIARY: This emergency, one source replacement is for the ourchase of a Series 5000 100 HP Rotory Blower. This is to replace a defective blower at the Waste Water Treatment Plant. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #75177, Memorandum and Quotations. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Waste Water Treatment Plant FISCAL IMPACT: Budget Account #620-008-0470-9106 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: ~tame:~ ohn Marshall Title: Purchasing Agent Approved: r , on : John Marshall (_f±`~ i ■ OF DYi~ T `t 1[R Ott WI N 901 6 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201 p,0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO, DOCUMENT Typo 75I7T 099/13/845 S07 SOU37500 t SHIP TO' VENDOR DENTON# SOUTHgRN tiYOROFLOW CITY OF tN£NT PLANT P.Q. 80X 3093 'ti/M TREATMENT TMENT 1,100 MAYNILL ROAD , DE SOTO • TX 751 15 LFNTONs TX 76203 r BID/REF. M :M ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUNT 620 008 0470 9106 1 lOla-5000 St1TOR91LT SLOWER 13.5699,!4 he City of Denton, Texas is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. T R .o. 1 3•569.14 reference P.O. Number on all B/L,Shipments and Invoices r.. shipments are F.O.B. Clty of Denton, or as indicated. By Send Invoices TO: Direct Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M, Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tam D. Shaw, C.P,M. Asst. Purchasing Agent (or as indicated on Purchase Order) 817/668.8311 D/FW Metro 287•u042 The City of Denton is an equal opportunity employer M E M O R A N D U M Tat Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities thru Ernie Tullos, Assistant Director of Utilities Fromt Asa Brown Dater September 9, 1986 SubJt Purchase of Replacement Sutorbilt Blower for North Plant P ease find attached two quotes we have recOlved for a replacement blower in the north plant. The only quote which we can accept is the one from Sutorbilt. The other quote from Roots, although highly cum'patitive, will not match the existing mounting skids and piping. The existing, defunct, blower is a Sutorbilt 1018-3200, but it is cost prohibitive to replace with the same unit. Sutorbilt recommends replacing the existing blower with a 1018-5000. The specifications are the same with the exception of the type of lubrication system. The new system is a splash rather than a force fed system. The total cost for the Sutorbilt Blower in $13,569.14 F.O.B. factory with a 14 week delivery time. The cost for the Roots Blower iv 3159655.00. The written quotes are attached to this purchase requisition. Since we are going to replace the existing Sutorbilt blower with another Sutorbilt, we recommend the purchase of the Sutorbilt blower 1018-5000 for the sum of $13,569.14. Since the delivery time will take 14 weeks and Sutorbilt has given the most cost effective quote, we resper_tfully recommend immediate purchase of this unit, waving the public bid requirement. Thank you for your support concerning this matter. rr r... rr •rr-rr--rr---r--rr-- AsarBrown,rSuperintendent Erniit Tullos, Wastewater Treatment Division for David Ham, Assistant Director, Waster/Wastewater cct David Ham Southern INCORPORATED P.O. Box 3097 • 1300 Brookside Drive • DeSoto, Toixiis 'l51 15 ;2141 223.0746 9 TX Wats 800,441-5 755 August 5, +986 City of Denton 1100 Mayhill Road Denton, Texas 76205 Attention Mr. Asa Brown Gentlemen: Replacement of a 100 HP Sutorbilt Series 5000 Rotary Blower The following is a quotation on the above. The 5000 Series will match up completely with our existing unit as to mounting dimensions and parts interchangeability in all typical maintenance areas, I have enclosed Sutorbilt Bulletin S-60B and Bulletin RMS 2 for your review and consideration. The unit cost of the Sutorbilt Blower is $13,569.14, F.O.B. factory. Freight would be prepaid and added with delivery time 14 weeks. Thank you for your continued support and the opportunity to work together on this project. Sincerely, Me ~t,L I " Enclosure EPB/rew PIPE 0 VALVES 0 FITTI~3S • PUMPS DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Purchase Order #75209 J.S. Equipment Co, RECOWIENDATiON: We recommend this emer ency Purchase Order to J.S. Equipment Co. for the amount of 13,565.48 be approved for payment. SUMPtARY:_ This unit #2525 is a Cat 973 used at the Landfill and the emergency repairs are for repairs to the undercarriage and tracks and for Preventative Maintenance. The type of material and soil conditions with continued use causes more excessive wear and frequent maintenance. Preventative Maintenance is made in other areas while these areas are exposed. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #75209,, Invoice #3755 PROGRAMS, KPARTHENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Vehicle Maintenance FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Maintenance #710-002-0580-8710 There is no additional impact on the General Fund. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: lev ame John Marshall Title: Purchasing Agent Approved: H*me: Jo n Marshall CA" OFUNTO "1•5 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201 P.O. NUMBER DATE VENDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYPE ?5209 09/15/86 CI 4 JJJ59500 ' SHIP T0; VENDOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Je 3 EDUIPrENT CO• CONFIRMATION ONLY 542 WILDLIFE PARKWAY DO NOT DUPLICATE .;RANr) PRAInIE@ TX 75050 BID/REF, q UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, UNE AMOUNT ~ ACCOUNT NUMBER 710 002 0880 8710 1 REPAIR TRACKOSSUNDER CARRIAGE 139566.48 TOTAL FOR PeO• 139566*48 e Cit of Denton, Texas is tax exempt • House -Bill No. 20, ference P.O. NumLsr on all B/L,Shipments and Invoices , hipments are F.O.S. City of Denton, or as indicated. 8y " 8#nd Invoices T0; Direct Inquiries T0; City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D. Shaw, C P,M, Asst, Purchasing Agent for as indicated on Purchase Order) 817/868.8311 D/FW Metro 267.0042 The City of Denton is an equal opportunit/ employer 7-1 I Nve) I CE r 375' 'J S E(-)UIPMENT SERVICE !NC - 602 WIL.DL:FE PA.RKWAy D4TE+ 'J9/1W; 96 GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 75250 .eta HOf V S % IUM7ER 1 14/ 62' -0211 Y(')UR P. i. + .i . AUTI-;QRIZED ~,Y. "IM BAE^ yi:)~,R ACCOUNT NUMSER+ 012,072 FOR Mr7DwL 7 CAT 9'71 r T TY DENT{:rN .r TS'(AS ST. S_R'. A_ NO. r 3217933 '0+ DENT(,)N TX 76201 EQ NO, r 2'9.9 y ,-HAUL MACHINE TO & FRom SHOP CLEAN UNDERCARRIAGE R & I TRACK PADS R ti ? RAI!- ASSEMBLIES R u I IDLERS u, I UNDERCAR.R,AGE R6LLERS` R, I CARRIER Rt1LLERS R $ I S?Rt.)CKF-T SEGMENTS SHOP LAB(JR ( 5a.00 HOURS REGULAR TIME' $ 1,624.00 ?ARTS AND OIL $ 1 t , 9m 0.33 WELDING $ 90.00 SALES TAX NGNE INVOICE TOTAL * 13,564.31! NOTI M !NVOICES ARE PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS. THERE WILL DATE: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell. City Manager SUBJECT: Purchase Order #95320 to J.S, Equipment Co. RECOKIENDATION: We recommend this emergency Purchase Order in the amount of $14,092.25 to J.S. Equipment Co, be approved. SUI*MRY: This unit #2500 is used at the Landfill, this repair is for repair of the undercarriage. This unit is used daily at the Landfill and under this kind of use the undercarriage will need a complete repair at least once a year, with some repairs during the year. DACKGROUND: Purchase Order #75320 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Vehicle Maintenance FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Repairs #710-002-0580 There is no additional impact on the General Budget. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V, llarrell City Manager Prepared by: : Jon arshal1 itle. Purchasing Agent Approved: ,nee. John Marshall 901.8 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201 P.O. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPI 753? p 09119/86 C14 S 111$9500 VENDOR SHIP TO: 1. S EQUIPMENT CO. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 602 AILDLIFE PAAKNAY COWIRMAYION ONLY GRAND PRAIRIE. TX 75050 DO NOT DUPLICATE 81D/REF. M M ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUNT 1 710 002 0580 8710 1 02500 REPAIR UNDERCARRIAGE 14.042.25, he City of Denton, Texas is tax exam t • House Bill No. 20. TOTAL FOR' P.O. 1 4, 092.25 reference P.O. Number on all B/L,Shipments and Invoices shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as indicated. By `J Send Invoices TO: Direct Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 218 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent for as Indicated on Purchase Order) 817/660.8311 D/FW Metro 267.0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity omployer CITY COUNCIL REPORT DATE: October 7, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Pi SE CFM # 75600 - FAW OD. RECOI01ENDATIOR: We, in concurrence withthe Airport Advisory Board, recmmen this purchase order in the armunt of $22,845.00 to Fiandar Co. be approved and the vendor be notified. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the purchase of an autorated weather reporting system for the Municipal Airport. MCKGROUND: Memo frcm Mr. Bill Angelo dated 9/30/86 riandar Quotation PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Airport Operations FISCAL IMPACT: $ 7,995.00 - 1986/87 Budget Funds 14,850,00 - 1935/86 Enctrrbered Funds $22,845.00 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager P epared by: Name: Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved; qN n J. Marshall, C.F.M. f~ 1 k 3k. CITY of DsE'NTON CZNTON, TEXA$ 78201 M E M O R A N D U M TOs Tom Shaw, Assistant Purchasing Agent FROMs Hill Angelo, Assistant Director of Public Works DATE: September 30, 1986 SUBJECTs PURCHASE ORDER TO HANDAR As you know, the City of Denton has been operating 1-he Unicom radio at the Denton Municipal Airport for the last fourteen moths u ing existing staff anJ temporary radio operati.nrs. The manual operation of this system puts quite a strain on the staff and on the Airport budgets thus, we have been attempting to secure an automated weather reporting system which will provide seven day per week, twenty-four hour per day coverage for the Airport users. In May, 1985, the City Council, based upon the recommendation from the Airport Advisory Board, authorized the issuance of Purchase Order #68500 for the purchase of such a system from Weathertalker, Inc. Shortly tizernafter, we discovered that this representatives from Weathertalker had misrepresented their product it that it had not been certified by the Federal Aviation Administration FAA) or the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for airport use and could not have been granted a frequency assignment. Naturally, we canceled our order with Weathertalker and have continued to operate the Unicom manually while searching for a certified system. In May, 1986, we discovered an automated weather reporting system produced by Handar, Inc. which was in the final steps of certification by the FAA and the FCC. At the time, Handar offered us a cut-rate deal on their system if we would allow other airport operators in the area tc observe the system on a periodic basis. This deal was dependent on the certification of the system which has recently been completed. The total cost of thi Handar system is $22,845 as indicated in the attached quotation. Funding foe this purchase will come from the PURCHASE ORDER TO H MDAR September 300 1986 Page 2 encumbered funds from the original purchase order issued to Weathertalker, Inc. (P. O. #68500) in the amount of. $14,850 with the balance of $7,995 coming from the 1986-87 Airport Budget, It is necessary to point out that the Handar Quotation will expire as of October 8, 1986, so it is essential to bring this item before the Council at their next meeting. Additionally, this product remains a single source purchase as there are no other such products which have received certificat'on from the FAA. My recent discussions with the FAA indicate that only one other company has applied for certification of an automated weather system and that this process will take a minimum of 90 days to complete. Since such a delay would result in the depletion of funds for the purchase due to the necessity funding from temporary Unicom operators, it is important that. „e move quickly on this matter. The Airport Advisory Board considered this matter at the meeting of September 9, 1986, and unanimously recommended the purchase of the Handar weather reporting system. Should you have any questions or comments on this matter, please let me know. • C Bil ngelo sA/sc air2 Attachment C WAIM I r nl"ar QUOTATION 1380 Borregaa Avenue Sunnyvale, Callffornla 94069 PAGE_ I OF_Z. PRO-FORMA DATE August 229 1986 f TO: Mr. Bruce Cardwell YOUR n401.1I8Y NO. DATE Acting Airport Manager Denton Municipal Airport 8-22-86 Route 1, Airport Road Denton, TX 76205 DELIVERY: 6n UAys After Receipt of Order TLEMEN: F,0,8,: _ Sunnyvale, CA We are pleased to quote price and dellvery on the goods as listed below: A NO. QUANTITY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1. 1 ! 575S AWOS I-1 System $20,650.00 a' $20,650.00 I j Includes: Data Collection and Processing Unit { Voice Synthesizer Telephone Modem i Two Digital Barometers ' Wind Speed and Direction Sensors l Temperature and Dew Point Sensors 1) Foot Tower Lightning Protected Signal and Power Distribution Units All Installation Hardware and Cables Sensor Simulator 2. 1 VHF Transmitter 3,000.00 31000.00 Includes: Antenna Cables Mounting Brackets 3. 1 Video Monitor 19550.00 1,550.00 Includes: Keyboard Dedicated Modem Interface Board Needs Dedicated Line to AWOS System SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM $25,200.00 Less, Demonstration Site Discount 41095.00 TOTAL, SYSTEM $21,105.00 r ' .ir t. ~lOTAT10f1 f+~MBER 1390 Bareoaa Avenue QUOTATION r--1O 1 Sunnyvale. Callibmia 94089 PAGE ...2 OF M NO, QUANTITY MODEL NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION ; UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 4. 1 Standard Installation (AWOS I) + $ 41800.00 # 4,800.00 Airport to provide: ! I * 110, 20 amp line to 10 foot sensor tower site * Proper concrete tower base i* Data lines between 10 foot sensor tower and I 1} Glide slope tower 2 Airport Managers office * Telephone line to 10 foot tower 5. , 1 Standard Maintenance (AWOS 1) 2,400/year ? 2,400.00 HANDAR.performs FAA required: I Semi-annual barometer calibration l* Annual AWOS site certification t SUBTOTAL, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE 7,200.00 Less, Demonstration Site Discount , 6,460.00 i , TOTAL, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE 19740.00 DOTAL, SYSTEM AND SERVICE 22 845.00 f I RKS (Exceptions, Special Conditions, Etc.) uotallon Is firm for 30 days and acceptance of this order must be~ only under the standard lerms and conditions set forth on the i4 anD ar a side of this form. 1380 Borrepas Avenue Sunnyvale, California 94089 TERMS OF PAYMENT TIC - Net 30 days after Invoice, suir)ect to credit approval, L~~ • krevoctle letter of credit for the fcdl Invoice value ex factory. BY: 8 ~2 DATE: In /17/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harroll, City Manager SUBJECT: Amendment of ordinance establishing zoning fees RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of ordinance. SUMMARY: Adoption of the ordinance will bring the city in line with the David Griffin study recommendations, BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted a five ykiar incremental plan to implement the David Griffin study. This is the fifth year of the plan. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFEC'T'ED: All departments of the city. FISCAL IMPAC'T': An additional $13,290.00 can be realized in the 1986-87 fiscal year by adopting the fifth year recommendations. The 1986-87 general fund only projects fees based upon the fourth year of the plan. Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Harrell w~~~ City Manager Prepared by: ~ D A& -AA 7e 1- Director of Plan ing and Development I"iSL NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF FEES PROVIDED FOR BY APPENDIX A AND B OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the fees provided for in Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances are hereby established as follows: A, Fees provided for in Section 4.22 of Chapter IV of Article III shall be as follows: 1. Preliminary, final plats or general development plans: (a) Less than S acres $ 200.00 (b) 5 acres or more $ 72S.00 2. Replats (a) Less than 3 lots $ 250.00 (b) All others $10450.00 3, Vacation of plat $ 175.00 4. Requ:st for variance to subdivision regulations $ 175.00 SECTION 11. That the feeQ provided for in Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton are established as follows: A. Fees provided for in Article 10 J for specific use permits $ 800.00 B. Fees provided for in Article 26 C for original zoning, or zoning amendment, which is not a planned development: 1. Less than 5 acres $ 800,00 2. 5 acres or more $1,100.00 Co Fees provided for in Article 26 C for planned development districts: Concept plan, detailed plan or amendment thereto: $10000.00, plus $50.00 per acre, or part thereof, to a maximum of $6,000.00 D. Historical Landmark Designation $ 65.00 SECTION III. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the pro- visions of this ordinance tecome effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective October 8, 1986. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE TWO Dr, (F.: October 7, 1986 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID/1961.0 IIMINE GNERATCR, LEWISVILJ.E H TWELI:C P1C PMJECT RECOWIENOATION: We reconn nd approval of this bid to Dominion Bridge- Sulzer, Inc, for $1,215,810.00 as evaluated and recawrended by Black do Veatch and approved by the Public Utility Board. SUMMARY: This bid was prepared by Black & Veatch and sent out by our Department. We received bids on Flay 8, 1986. Black do Veatch evaluated the bids and their documents are attacheu, Also attached are the minutes of the Public Utilities Board's meeting. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet - Black & Veatch Evaluation Public Utilities Board Meeting Minutes PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: FISCAL IMPACT: No additional impact on the General Fund Re,,pectfuily submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: N .,John J. Marshall, C.P,M. ►itle: Purchasing Agent Approved: Q/Lc#Ei.~cr~- o . Marshekli, C.P.M. WIT ~I~ } ih, C'~".'.U16 fS:.~C I `I r)~L`~r 1 ;rrlt"~il l!'ii li I~1.+~~1~~1'. - ~!'.~.I" [I'•~i~l>t i~a.li~•{ill i ~ IIL •i.Fflpi_ 4i«IC. %1., « a 1 (4 mill C~JI~E~~l~l~l ,~:~~~".II. ~~tllllfih Vt.I.UQII 1 1 i I I 1 i 1 I I ~ 1 I I I I I I r . I I i 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 ' ~ ~ 1 1 I I % 1 I I I I I 1 r 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I r I 1 ' I 1 ~ I ' 1 :r No. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE RIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid Invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; and WHEREAS, Section 2,36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $10,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the ",ouncil providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contra::ing of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the following competitive bids fnr the construction of, public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita- tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 96116 r`AUNICN FAinF.91 ER W_ Sj,~$~RIA.tei SECTION 11, That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works oi: improvements in accordance witi`h the bide accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein. I i PACE ONE i't1 E~. t' formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written 'contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved arJ accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective Lmmediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 7 day of OCTOBER K. , r RAY STEPHENS CITY OF DENTdN, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE e CITY SF.MMTM CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY1 PAGE TWO SEA' 1Y 1986 B L A C K & V E A T C H ENGINEt,RS-ARCHITE:TS TEL, 19131339-2000 IWO MSADOW LAKE PARKWAY MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX NO, 8404 KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 84114 City of Denton, Texas B&V Project 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project B&V File 14.0200 Turbine Generator 62.0200.00 September 16, 1986 City of Denton Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Attentiont Mr. R. E. Nelson Gentlement The negotiations with Dominion Bridge-Sulzer, Inc, for the Base Bid have resolved all outstanding items. The results of the negotiations would slightly decrease the Total Evaluated Costs of the Dominion Bridge-Sulzer bids as listed in bid evaluation in ouc letter of June 1, 1986. Therefore, the conclusions of the evaluation are still valid and the evaluation will not be revised. As a result of the successful completion of the negotiations, we recommend that the contract for furnishing the turbine generator for the subject project be awarded to Dominion Bridge-Sulzer, Inc. We further recommend that the terms and conditions of the contract be in a!:cordance with the enclosed draft letter of intent. Please provide formal acknowledgement and approval of our recommendation and the enclosed draft letter of intent. y y rs, 8 EAT S CGuyF.ot SAAijwa Enclosure cc: Mr. E. B. Tullos v. B L A C K & V E A T C H ENGINEERS- AWAITECTS TEL, (913) 339.2000 IIWOMEADOW LAKE PARKWAY NAILING ADORESS P.O. BOX NO. $405 AAFISAS CITY, MISSOURI 64114 City of Denton, Texas 80 Project 10566 Lewisville Hydroelectric Project B&V File 62,0200.00 Turbine Cenerator 14.0400 October 8, 1986, gominion Bridge-Suizer, Inc. 555 Notre Dame Street Lachine, Quebec, Canada H852B1 Attentions Mr, Thomas P. Taylor Centlement This is to advise that the City of Denton, Texas intends to enter into a contract with Dominion Bridge-Sulzer, Inc. for the purchase of the turbine generator for the subject project. The proposed contract for this work will be based on the specifications issued March 6, 1986 and your proposal dated May 14, 1986 and subsequent submittals thereto, as suc'! proposal and subsequent submittals have been accipted by the City and the Engineer. The Contract will be based on the Base Bid (1650mm). The Contract price is $1,216,810 US, develuped as follows Lump Sum Price (Item C.0 $1,215,850 VibrAtion Switch 960 $1,216,810 The following items will be Contract options to be selected by the City at prices proposed, Optional Performance Tests (Item C,1,10) Training Program Option (Item C.4) Spare Parts (Items C.5 and D,9) Synchronous Bypass Valve ($18,000 US, see Item 1 below) Cone Valve ($145,000 US, see Item 2 below) Control of Corps of Engineers valves ($41000 US) see Item 3 below). ULACK A YZATCH Dominion Bridge-Sulzer, Inc. 2 B&V Project 10566 Mr. Thomas P. Taylor October 8, 1986 The Contract will also include the following items which were reso,vtad during negotiations between Dominion Bridge-Sulzer 08-8) and Black & Veatch (B&V) on September 11, 1986. 11 The synchronous bypass valve may be deleted from the scope of supply for a deduct of $18,000 until February 1, 1987. 2. DB-S will supply a 48 Howell-Bunger cone valve including hydraulic operators, hydraulic pumping set and control panel for installation by the Owner for a price adder of $145,000 until February 1, 1987. 3. DB-S will supply control Logic and two redundant powar supplies to control the Corps of Engineers valves for a price adder of $4,000.00. 4. DB-S exception 1 regarding use of standard materials, as listed in the equipment data pages is acceptable as proposed. 5. DB-S exception 7 regarding use of standard water filtration system (dual basket strainers without automatic backwash) is acceptable as proposed except that a differential pressure switch will be provided by DB-S to alarm strainer pluggage. 6. DB-S exception 3 regarding location of thrust bearing and radial supports is acceptable as proposed. 7. Db-S exception 4 regarding no accumulator, for governor oil is acceptable as proposed. 8. DB-S exception 5 regarding generator design for runaway speed will be revised to reads "The generator will be designed to withstand the maximum turbine runaway speed." 9. DB-S exception 6 to schedule of submittal is acceptable, except the following revisions will be made. o Page 1A-8, Item 91 certified at 210 days. o Page IA-8p Item 15, preliminary at 90 days. o Page IA-9, Item 26, certified at 240 days. 0 Page 1A-10, Items 35 and 36, preliminary at 210 days BLACK A VXATCH Dominion Bridge-Sulzer, Inc. 3 B&V Project 10566 Hr. Thomas P. Taylor October 8, 1986 10. DB-S exception 1 regarding submittal of prototype Hill diagram is acceptable as proposed. 11. DB-S proposed new Clause GC.32 will be incorporated into GC.26 Guarantee, as follows. GC.26 GUARANTEE. The Contractor guarantees that the work herein contracted will be as specified and will be free from defects in detiign, workmanship, and materialo. If within the guarantee period the work falls to meet the provisions of this guarantee, the Contractor shall promptly correct any defects, including nonconformance with the contract documents by adjustment, repair, or replacement of all defective parts or materials. For correction of any defects, the Owner shall assume all responsibility and expense for removal and reinstallation In connection with the foregoing remedy. The same obligations and conditions shall extend to replacement items furnished by Contractor hereunder. Contractor shall have the right of disposal of items replaced b it. Owner shall grant Contractor access to the goods at all reasonable times in order for Contractor to determine any defect in the goods. The guarantee period shall begin on the date of final payment or the date of initial operation, whichever is later, and shall end 12 months laterl provided however, that in no event shall the guarantee period extend beyond 18 months from the date of final equipment delivery to the Jobsite. If manufacturer's field representatives are included In the contract, such services shall be furnished by the Contractor without cost for the correction of any defects. This guarantee shall be extended to cover all repairs and replacements furnished under the guarantee and the period of the guarantee for each such repair or replacement shall be one year after installation or completion. The Contractor will be given an opportunity to confirm the existence of the defect but he shall not delay the correction while making such determination. f Oi,ACK A VCATCH Dominion Bridge-Sulzer, Inc. G B&V Project 10566 Mr. Thomas P. Taylor October 8, 1986 If within 10 days after the Owner has notified the Contractor of a defect, failure, or abnormality in the work, the Contractor has not started to make the necessary rapairs or adjustments, the Owner is hereby authorized to make the repairs or adjustmenta or to order the work to be done by a third party, the cost of the work to be paid by the Contractor. In the event of an emergency wher-3, in the judgement of the Owner, delay would cause serious loss or damage, repairs or adjustments may be made by the Owner or a third party chosen by the Owner without advance notice to the Contractor and the cost of the work shall be paid by the Contractor, or by the surety. The Contractor and ita_ suppliers shall have no responsibility if the goods have been improperly stored, handled or installed, if the goods have not been operated or maintained according to their ratings or according to instructions in Contractor or supplier furnished manuals, or if unauthorized repairs or madifications have been made to the,goodt, THIS WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER wARRANTIES EXCEPT TITLE), INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, AND CONSTITUTES THE ONLY WARRANTY OF COMPANY WITH RESPECT TO THE GOODS. The forgoing states owner's exclusive remedy against Contractor and its suppliers for any defect in the goods or for failure of the goods to b43 as warranted, whether Owne s remedy is based on contract,, warrant failure of such remedy to achieve its essential purpose tort (including ne li ence indemnity or any other legal theory, and whether arising out of warranties, representations, instructions, inst,)llations or defects from any cause, 12. DS-9 new Clause CC.33 will be incorporated as follows, GC, 32 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Neither Contractor nor its suppliersi shall be liable, whether in contract, warranty, failure of a remedy to achieve its essential purpose, tort (including negligence), indemnity or any other legal theory, for loss of use, revenue or profit, or for cost of capital or of substitute use or performance, or for indirect, special, liquidated, incidental or consequential damages, or for claims by Owner for damages of owner's customers, SLACK * VLAYCH Dominion Bridge-SuLzer, Inc. 5 B&V Project 10566 Mr. Thomas P. Taylor October 8, 1986 13. Exception to Article 2E.2.3.2 will be revised to reads "Ductwork beyond the generator aLv exhaust duct flange at top of generator will :;e provided by the Owner and will have a maximum pressure drop of 1/2 inch water gauge." 14. Exception to Article 2E.2.3.2 is acceptable as proposed by 08-S. 15. Exception to Article 2E,2.3.11 will be deleted. 16. Exception to Articles 2E.2.5, 2E.3.6 and 2E.3,7 will be deleted. 17, Exception to Article 2E.3.1 is acceptable as proposed, 18. Exception to Article 2E.3.2 is acceptable as proposed with the addition of "e. Voltage imbalance" to part C. 19. DB-S will design the wicket gate operating Linkage buckling rods to withstand the worst 3xpected transient forces without buckling (Article 28,7), 20. BD-S will provide continuous monitoring of turbine flow by the Peck Method (Article 2C.2). 21. DB-S will provide a General Electric Series 6 programmable controller instead of the Could Modicon specified (Article 2H.3.8). 22. DB-S will provide a governor with the specified flow control mode (Article 2H.2.3). 23, DB-S will provide the specified power factor control capability (Article 2H.2.4). 24. DB-$ will provide a free wheel diode assembly to dissipate energy during transients instead of a field circuit brealter (Article 2E,3.7), 25. DB-S will provide diodes in aeries without fuses to meet the redundancy criteria for the rectifier (Article 2E.3.6). 26. Thyristor temperature rise will be measured at the base of the cooling fin connection to the heat sink (Article 2E,3,4), BLACK & VEATCH Dominion Bridge-Sulzer, Inc. 6 96V Project 10566 Mr. Thomas P. Taylor October 8, 1986 27. Metal oxide varistors will be provided instead of surge capacitors (Article 2E.3.6). 28. The following corrections to the equipment data pages will be made. Page D-9 CNM to 614M Page D-15 Oil pressure tank listing to N/A Page D-18 300 to 5,000 29, Access to the draft tube will be provided through the discharge ring, a manhole will not be provided. This letter of intent constitutes "Award of Contract" in accordance with Article 1A.6 of the specifications, which shall correspond to the date of this letter of intent. Accordingly, this letter initiates tha Schedule of Activities which are tied to "Award of Contract." All other schedule dates remain as specified. Following receipt of executed acceptance of this Letter of intent, contract conformance will proceed in accordance with this letter of intent. BLACK A VEATCH Dominion Bridge-Sulzer, Inc. 7 MV Project 10566 Mr. Thomas P. Taylor October 8, 1986 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The undersigned parties hereby agree to the terms and conditions of this letter of intent for furnishing the turbine generator for the Lewisville Hydroelectric Project for the City of Denton, Texas. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DOMINION BRIDGE-SULZER, INC. BY. By Title Title Date Date EXCERPT FROM MINUTES or PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD 09/24/86 2. RBC IVE PRESENTATION BY BLACK AND VEATCH CONSULTING Nelson reviewed for the Board the action taken at the last meeting. Nelson then introduced Mr. Guyot and Mr. Armbruster. Mr. Guyot and Mr. Armbruster reviewed the feasibility of the project for the Board. In the Black 4 Veatch feasibility presentation, they noted that when analyzing the Lewisville Hydroelectric Project as a profit center, the annual costs for debt service (based on 51 financing) and operations and maintenance would range from 2.85L/XWH in 1989 to 3.494/KWH 19959 and the value of power and energy would range from 4.8L/KWH in 1989 to 5.81/KWH in 1995 based on giving a $1640/KW/Mo credit to 501 of the unit's available capacity and assuming gas generated energy costs of 21/KWH in 1989 and escalating at S1 per year. This analysis indicates that the project would be profitable from the first year of operation. Nelson added that when analyzing the project as a cost center, the annual costs for debt service and operations and maintenance would be $$43,000 in 1989 and $5920000 in 1995 and considering the annual electricity produced is estimated to be 1207280000 KWH, the cost per KWH would be 4.270/KWH in 1989 and 4,65e/KWH in 1995. This is based on 10% interest rate on the estimated $3,184,000 debts Therefore the cost of this electrical energy is less than the 5.81/KWH energy from TMPA or from natural gas enerated energy wherein natural gas costs are in the 13080 to 4.20/00tu range. Denton's present contract gas rate is 13,40/MMBtud The Board discussed the need and desirability of the project and the relative merits of the additional capacity credits to the Denton syKtems Boyd expressed a concern about the substantial capital outlay for unnecessary generating capacity. The board determined that addittona.-l capacity would be required in four our five years, and that hydroelectric power is the cheapest long term power available. Thompson moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the purchase of the recommended hydroelectric equipment, to release Blac% 4 Veatch to proceed with the project and to approve negotiations for the pipeline and final design. Cooties second. All ayes, one nay (Boyd), motion carried. DAM 10/7/86 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T 91 TOr Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTt consider adoption of an ordinance establishing residential and commercial garbage collection charges. RECOMMENDATIGNt The staff recommends approval. SUMMARYr The ordinance establishes residential collection charges at $9.00 per 30 day period. Ten (10) rates are established for commercial garbage collection charges based upon cubic yards collected per 30 day period. BACKGROUNDt These charges were discussed during the budgetary process. The increases will enable tt~e Solid Waste Division to meet the revenue requirements contained in the fiscal 1986-87 budget. PROGRAMSC DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt Affects all residential and commercial solid wants customers. FISCAL 7.MPACTt The residential increase will raise approximately $84,000 and the commercial increase will raise approximately $73,808. The residential rate increases will cost our customers approximately $6.00 per year. The average increase to commer- cial dumpster customers is 6.81 and the average increase to our commercial roll-off customers is 8,79. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager P red byt a es S. atkins Superintendent, Solid Waste Approved by% i"11 ngelo- Assistant Director of Public Works sw13 1601L NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON ESTABLISHING RATES FOR THE USE OF THE CITY'S SANITARY LANDFILL SITE AND RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICES AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 12 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That the charges for residential garbage collection services as authorized by section 12-19(b) of article II of Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby established in the amount of Nine Dollars and No/100 ($9.00) for each individual family unit for a thirty day period. SECTION Ill That the charges for commercial and institutional garbage collection services as authorized by section 12.20 of article III of chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances are hereby established as follows: A. DUMPSTERS Cubic Yards Collected Rate Per 30 Per 30 Day Period Day Period 1-15 1.90 16-24 1,4S 25-40 1.28 41-199 1.21 200-399 1.15 400-499 1.12 SOO-S99 1.09 600-699 1.08 700-799 1.OS 800-Up 1:1001 B. OPEN TOP CONTAINERS AND COMPACTORS Service Change For Rent Once a Week PicLup Type of Container Per 30 Day Period Per 30 D& Period 20 cu. yd, open top 37.65 308:,00 30 cu. yd. open top S0,00 375.10 40 cu. yd. open top 55100 1442.20 12 cu, yd. compactor 83,00 194.70 15 cu, yd. compactor 85.00 216.70 20 cu, yd. compactor 110.00 2S9.60 25 cu. yd. compactor 110.00 312.60 30 cu, yd. compactor 150100 375.00 42 cu. yd, compactor 1168s00 514.80 A delivery fee of $50.00 per container will be charged to all-new customers for open top containers and compactors. SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CCTY OF DBNTON, TEXAS 1";ROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DbBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PACE 2 CITY OF DV?rrON MEMORANDUM TOt Bill Angelo, Assistant Director of Public Works FROMr Charles Watkins, Superintendent, Solid Paste DATEt September 29, 1986 SUBJECTt SOLID WASTE RATES 1. RESIDENTIAL RATES The residential garbage collection rate is proposed to be $9.00 per 30 diy billing period. The rate increase will provide for the hiring of two positions who will be responsible for litter collection as specified in the budget. Special pickup services will also be increased. The Solid Waste Division will collect up to seven (7) cubic yards of properly prepared brush or other unusual accumulations of waste at no charge and will collect up to four (4) appliances )r pieces of furniture at no charge. The limitation on the volume or number of items is to prevent the residential collection, unit from becoming the hauler for a commercial enterprise. i SOLID WASTE RATES September 29, 1986 Page 2 II. COMMERCIAL DUMPSTER RATES The current City of Denton Solid Waste Division dumpater rate is a flat rate which has enabled our competition to acquire the larger solid waste customers by offer- ing a price break to them. To enable the City to effectively compete, a declining block rate structure is proposed based upon the cubic yardage of refuse collected per 30 day billing period. This rate begins to recover our cost from our small customers and should enable the Solid Waste Division to compete for the large accounts. The revenue increase amounts to a 6.8%. Individual rate percentages are higher or lower for various customer classes. The impact of the rate increase is shown on Table 2. The following table shows the proposed rates for cubic yards collected per 30 day period: TABLE 1 CUBIC YARDS COLLECTED RATE 1 - 15 $1.90 16 - 24 1.45 25 - 40 1.28 41 -199 1.21 200 -399 1.15 40 -499 1.12 500 -599 1.09 600 -699 1.08 700 -799 1.05 800 - up 1.01 SOLID WASTE RATES September 29, 1986 Page 3 TABLE 2 The fallowing table compares current and proposed City of Denton commercial 6umpster rates with the proposed rates for the City of Garland and with the current rates of our competitor where available. 2 CUBIC YARD 1-X WK. 2-X WK. 3-X WK. 4-X WK. 5-X WK. 6-X WK. Denton Proposed $15.20 $23,20 $ 34,80 $ 40.96 $ 51.20 $ 58.08 Denton Current 13.86 21.67 30,48 37.29 45.10 52,91 Garland Proposed 41.00 73.00 106.00 139,00 171.00 204.00 TX Waste Mgmt. (Lewisville) Has no 2 cubic yard container, 3 CUBIC YARD 1-X WK. 2-X WK. 3-X WK. 4-X WK, 5-X WK. 6-X WK. Denton Proposed $22.80 $34.80 $ 46.08 $ 58,08 $ 72.60 $ 87.12 Denton Current 17,55 29.05 40.55 52,05 63.55 75.05 Garland Proposed 45,00 80.00 115.00 149.00 185.00 220.00 TX Waste Mgmt. (Denton) 20,00 38.00 TX Waste Mgmt, (Lewisville) 45.08 74.07 (Does not provide more than 2-X per week service for 3 cubic yard containers) multiple 3 cubic yard containers are at flat rate.) 4 CUBIC YARD 1-X WK. 2-X WK. 3-X WK. 4-X WK. 5-X WK. 6-X WK. Denton Proposed $23.20 $40.96 $ 58.06 $ 77.44 $ 96.80 $116.16 Denton Current 21.46 36.87 52.28 67.69 83.10 98.51 Garland Proposed 47,00 84.00 123.00 161,00 198.00 235.00 TX Waste Mgmt. (Denton) 25.00 44.00 TX Waste Mgmt. (Lewisville) Has no 4 cubic yard container. 6 CUBIC YARD 1-X WK. 2-X WK. 3-X WK. 4-X WK. 5-X WK. 6-X WK. Denton Proposed $23.20 $58.08 $ 87.12 $116.16 $145.20 $174.24 Denton Current (Interpolated) 30,62 53,74 76.86 99.98 123.10 146.22 TX Waste Mgmt. (Lewisville) 74,07 116.12 161.20 208.72 250.78 295.70 SOLID WASTE RATES September 29, 1986 Page 4 SEVEN (7) THREE CUBIC YARD DUMPSTERS SERVICED 3-X PER WEEK Denton Proposed $ 289.80 Denton Current 283.85 TX Waste Mgmt. - Denton 266.00 TX Waste Mgmt. - Lewisville 564.20 (Interpolated) Garland Proposed 805.00 TWENTY-THREE (23) THREE CUBIC YARD DUMPSTERV SERVICED 3-X PER WEEK Denton Proposed $ 836.28 Denton Current 932.65 TX Waste Mgmt. - Denton 836.00 TX Waste Mgmt. - Lewisville 1,853.80 (Interpolated) Garland Proposed 2,645.00 SOLID WASTE RAM September 290 1986 Page 5 ANNUAL REVENUE CURRENT PROPOSED RATE RATE $504,324 $538,905* * Assumes all existing customers are retained and no new customers are added. SOLID WASTE RATES Sel,tember 290 1986 Page 6 III. ROLL-OFF RATES An overall rate increase of 8.7% is proposed for roll,,off customers as followso OPEN TOP CURRENT RENT PROPOSED RENT CURRENT PROPOSED CONTAINER PER 30 DAYS PER 30 DAYS PULL ESE* PULL FEE 20 cu. yd. $ 37.65 $ 37.65 $ 70.00 $ 77.00 30 cu, yd. 42.50 50.00 85.25 93.76 40 cu. yd. 47.25 55.00 100.50 110.55 CURRENT RENT PROPOSED RENT CURRENT PROPOSED COMPACTORS PER 30 DAYS PER 30 DAYS PULL FEE PULL FEE 12 cu. yd. $ 83.00 $ 83.00 $ 44.25 $ 48.68 15 cu. yd. 85.00 85.00 49.25 54.18 20 cu, yd. 110.00 3.10.00 59.00 64.90 25 cu, yd. 110.00 110.00 71.00 76.10 30 cu. yd. 150.00 150.00 85.25 93.76 42 cu. yd. 168.00 168,00 117.00 128.70 A $50.00 delivery fee is also proposed for new roll-off customers. This will enable the Solid Waste Division to recover the cost of installing a new account, particularly short-term accounts, our competitors all charge a deliver!? fee in excess of $50.00. * Pull Fos - The charge for emptying the container. k SOLID WASTE RATES September 29, 1986 Page 7 The following is a list of our roll-off accounts which compares current charges with proposed charges, and shows what our competitors would charge for the same level of services CURRENT PROPOSED WASTE MGMT. BFI CUSTOMER CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES Acme $ 415,30 $ 445,83 $ $ Utter 273.28 292.30 CBS 463.55 501,61 Chili's 311,76 311,76 Poleyard 134.14 143.31 265.00 382,00 EMC 262.65 277.92 Flow 871,10 947.21 Gibbs 409.08 445.73 Mall 671.10 721.41 935.00 965.00 GTE 463,55 501.61 GTE 415.30 445,83 Handy Dan 293.78 306.35 440.00 485.00 Harpool's 451.58 488.23 760.00 980.00 Josten's 463.55 501.61 K-Mart 671.10 721.41 935,00 965.00 Kolmar 1,636.50 10789.15 Kno-Tech 115.82 123.15 Moore Business Forms 720.60 781.66 Morrison Milling 653.83 710.91 Nico 451.58 488.23 760.00 980.00 Ohio Rubber 296.78 317,95 Payless 671.10 721.41 935.00 965.00 Peterbilt 2,683.50 2,935.05 3,575.00 3,525.00 Peterbilt 11551.30 1,697.93 21740.00 3,412.00 Pillsbury 720.60 781.66 Record Chronicle 883.15 956.47 1,595.00 11605.00 Ruf-Nook 115.82 123.15 232.00 341.00 Russell Newman 1,025.90 1,117.49 Andrew 1,174.20 1,274.82 11595.00 1,605.00 Sally 671.10 721.41 935.00 965.00 Sears 671,10 721.41 935,00 965.00 Seventy-Six Truck Stop 463.55 501.61 Sheraton 333.29 351.62 605.00 645,00 Skaggs 10174.20 1,274.82 1,595.00 1,605.00 Target 201.24 221.37 264,00 256.00 Tetra Pak 31018.60 31320.46 41235.00 4,165.00 Tetra Pak 6,725.85 '7,385.69 12,180.00 15,084.00 Texas Sunshine 115,82 123.15 232.00 341.00 Union Carbide 419.55 444.71 605.00 655.00 Victor's 671.10 721.41 935.00 965.00 Victor's 479,40 522.62 Vintage 213.28 292.30 Westgate 1,124,. 1,226.28 Hickory St. 42.' 42.50 Cobble St, 42,50 42.:10 State School 1,875.38 2,058.66 1 SOLID WASTE RATES September 29, 1986 Page 8 ANNUAL REVENUE CURRENT PROPOSED RATE RATE $450,896 $490,123* * Assumes constant level of service throughout the year. OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor 8 Members of the City Council Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney SUBJECT: Repeal of Article III of the "Health 8 Sanitation's Chapter of the Code of Ordinances relating to the regulation of Massage Establishments DATE: October 3, 1946 Attached hereto for your consideration is an ordinance repealin Article III of the "Health $ Sanitation" Chapter of the Code of Ordinances relating to the regulation of massage establishments. The State Legislature enacted "Legislation effective January 1, 1986, which provides for liceoging and regulation of massage establishments by the state (Article 4512k, V.A.C.S.). As our ordinance providing that the Cit;► license and regulate massage establishments has been preemptea by state statute, I respect- fully recommend that those provisions of the Health Chapter relating to massage establishments Lwo repealed. Respectfully submitted, DRAYOVTT DAD:js Attachment lS9SL NO► AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE III OF CHAPTER THIRTEEN "HEALTH AND SANITATION" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, RELATING TO MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Article III of Chapter 13 "Health and Sanitation" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dente::, Texas, relating to massage establishments is hereby repealed. SECTION Ile That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986. RAY MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON,OTFYAS APPROVED AS TO LE:iAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TV: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney SUBJECT: Repeal of Article III of the "Offenses 4 Miscellaneous Provisions" Chapter of the Code of Ordinances DATE: October 3, 1986 As I have discussed with you over the past year and half, we are attempting to "clean up" our Code of Ordinances. Attached hereto for your consideration is an ordinance repealing Article III of the "Offenses & Miscellaneous Provisions" Chapter of the Code of Ordinances. This article contains such provisions as prohibiting a male person from annoying any female person, prohibiting loitering, prohibiting solicitation by prostitutes, and soliciting for money, clothes or food, as alms, in a public place. The ordinance also defines disorderly conduct and tres. pass as offenses, both of which are now addressed in the Texas Penal Code. As most of these provisions have been preempted by state law, I respectfully recommend that you adopt this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, DEBRA A. D19YOV DAD:js Attachment -17 mow' 1596L NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE III OF CHAPTER FOURTEEN "OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, RELATING TO PUBLIC MORALS AND CONDUCT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Article III of Chapter 14 "Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions!' of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, relating to public morals and conduct is hereby repealed. SECTION 110 That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY RXYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: MOTTE ALLEN CITY SECXETXKY CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: f CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT D11T81 10/1/86 v . TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMS Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTr Adoption of an ordinance establishing rates for the rental of aircraft hangar and tie-down space owned by the City of Denton and authorizing the City manager or his designee to enter into contrauts for the rental of such property. RECOMMENDATIONr The Airport Advisory Board considered this item at its regular meet'yg of August 12, 1986, and unanimously voted to recommend the approval of this o0inance to the City Council. SUMMARYr in essence, this ordinance establishes rates for rental of City-owned aircraft tie-down spaces on the north and south ramps and for the rental of City-owned open and enclosed T-hangars. These are the rates currently being charged as estab- liuhed by staff in consultation with the Airport Advisory Board. The rates are comparable with the rental rates charged by the existing FBO and with other such rates at similar airport facilities. Additionally, this ordinance authorizes the City Manager or his designee to enter into contracts for the rental of such property. BACKGROUNDS As a result of the amendment of the Aerosmith/Maverick contract last year, the City recaptured the northern half of the old Aerosmith lease which included 24 tie-down spaces on the north ramp and six T-hangars. Additionally, the com- pletion of the south ramp construction project resulted in the creation of 39 additional tie-down spaces owned and controlled by the City. While we established and began collecting rental fees immediately upon o}taining these facilities based upon discussion with the Airport Board and City Council, the City Attorney's office has advised us that it would be more appropriate to have these rates established by ordinance. PROGRAMSr DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDr Denton Municipal Airport. OrTY COUNCIL RBP0Rr FMOAT 10/1/86 FISCAL IMPACT: We estimate that the rental of these facilities at the proposed rate will generate approximately $16,000 is► revenue for the 1996.87 fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd V. Harrell M City Manager Prepared bys Bill Belo Assistant Director of Public Works Approved byi Bill Angelo Assistant Director of Public Works air2 r, NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING RATES FOR THE RENTAL OF AIRCRAFT HANGAR AND TIE-DOWN SPACE OWNED BY THE CITY UPON THE DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANA'SR TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS FOR THE RENTAL OF SUCH PROPERTY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the charges for the rental of the City's aircraft han ars and tie-down spaces upon the Denton Municipal Airport she l be as follows: A. Overni4ht Tie•down; 1. Single engine aircraft 2. Twit; engine aircraft 3.00 S.DUa B. Monthly Tle-doxn (North Ras 1. Single engine aircraft 2, Twin engine aircraft 140.0 11 SO.OOR C. Monthly Tie-down (South Ramp); 1. Single engine aircraft 2. Twin engine aircraft $30.00 • $40.00 D. 0 en T-Nan ars Monthl $50.00 E. Enclosed T-Hangars {Monthly; $70.00 "Where the wing span of a twin engine aircraft exceeds 40 feet, an addltlonal charge of $1.50 per foot shall be made for each foot in excess of 40 feet. SECTION il. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to enter into contracts for the rental of the City's aircraft hnigars and tie-down spaces at the rates set forth herein. 5,- ECTION_ III, f r That this ordinance shall become effective Immediately upon its passage and approval. ii PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986, CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS ATTEST: CHAAL CITY Or DONFUNO TEXAS APPROVED DEBRAADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY j CITY OF DDINNTONN o TEXAS BY: ~~lu l1 a THE STATE OF TEXAS AIRCRAFT HANGAR/TIE DOWN COUNTY OF DENTON LEASE AGREEMENT This lease agreement is made and executed this -P--, day of , 19 , at Denton, Texs.s, by and between the City of Denton, Texas, hereinafter referred to as "Lessor," and hereinafter referred to as "Le88ee." WITNESSETH: The parties hereto, for and in consideration of the rents, covenants and conditions contained herein, mutually agree as follows: 1. Leased Premises. Lessor does hereby demise and lease Ed Losses an, essee does hereby hire and take from Lessor, (designation o hangar/tie-down space ' situated on the Denton Municipal Airport for the storage of an aircraft identified as: (Number) (Type) (Color) (Registered Owner) together with the right of ingress and egress to said property, in common with others so authorized, of passage on the Airport property generally, subject to reasonable regulations by the City of Denton; and such rights shall extend to the Lessee's employees, passengers, patrons, and invitees. 2. Term, The term of this agreement shall be month to month, commencing on , 19 , and continuia for successive months unless earlier terminated under the provisions of this agreement. Either party may terminate this lease without cause by giving the other party at least thirty (30) days written notice prior to termination. J' I Ul 3. Rental. Lessee covenants and a reel to pay Lessor as casideration for this lease, the sum of per mouth, payable in advance, each and every month during the term of this agreement. 4. Use of Leased Premises. Use of the leased premises s a • e o tho atorage of the above described aircraft, and n,o other purpose, unless specifically authorized in writing by the Airport Manager. 5. Laws. Lessee shall comply with all current and ruture federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations which mar, apply to the conduct of operations contemp te including rules, regulations and ordinances promulgated by Lessor. 6. Chemicals. Lessee agrees to properly store, collect an spose of all chemicals and chemical residues, and petroleum products and residues; to properly store, confine, collect and dispose of all pai:ztincluding paint spray in the atmosphere, and paint products; and to comply with all local, state, and federal regulations governing the storage, handling- or disposal of such chemicals, petroleum products and paints. 7. Relocation of Aircraft. Lessee herein authorizes essor to temporar y move or relocate any aircraft or property on the airport for special purposes or needs, such as for airshows, special events, for the temporary accommodation of large aircraft or aircraft movements, for ramp or hangar maintenance purposes, for reasons of inclement weather, or for other reasons deemed necessary by the Lessor. Lessee agrees to cooperate with Lessor in the relocation of such aircraft. 8. Securing Aircraft. Lessee agrees to properly position an t • own its aircraft and property, and to adequately collect excessive amounts of oil or other fluids which may drip or leak from Lessee's aircraft or property. 9. Im rovementa. Lessee agrees that no improvements may be aae in or upon the leased premises without the written consent of the Airport Manager. All fixtures, improvements or additions made in or upon PAGE 2 the leased premises shall become the property of the Lessor and shall remain on the preaises upon the termination of this lease, for whatever cause, without payment of compensation to the Lessee. 10. Waiver of Liability and 10deanification. Lessee ur er covenants an agrees w not hold Lessor or any of Lessor's agents, officers or employees responsible for any 1004 occasioned by fire, theft, rain, windstorm, hail, or from any other cause whatsoever, whether said cause be the direct, indirect or merely a contributing factor in producing the loss to any airplane, automobile, personal property, parts or surplus that may be located or stored in the hangars, T-hangars, offices, aprons, field, or any other location at airport; and Lessee agrees that the planes and their contents are to be stored, whether on the field or in the hangars, at Lessee's risk. Lessee agrees to indemnify, defend and save airport, its agents, officers, representatives, and employees, harmless from and against any and all liability or loss resulting from claims or court action arising directly or indirectly out of the activities of Lessee, its agents, servants, guests or business visitors under this agreement or by reason of any act or omission of such person. 11. Ri ht of Entry. Lessor shall have the right to enter 'F-eYiased premises at any time for inspection or to make repairs, additions or alterations as may be necessary for the safety, improvement, or preservation thereof. 12. Assi nment Su_b_l_e_ttia . This lease agreaaent shall be Limited to parking and storage of the above-described aircraft and may not be assigned to any other person, firm or corporation without the written consent of the Airport Manager. Lessee shall not sublet nor furnish to any other person, firs or corporation any hangar, T-hangar, field storage privilege, or any other ri ht or privilege in or upon any airport property wittout the written consent of the Airport Manager. 13. Default. In the event of any misrepresentation or • au in the terms of this agreement by Lessee, Lessor shall have the right to ground all aircraft and padlock all hangar's of Lessee until such PAGE 3 default is cured. Lessor shall have the further right to immediately terminate this agreement upon written notice to Lessee, setting forth the reason therefore, and refunding a pro rata amount of the rental, if any, for the unexpired portion of the month following the date of such termination. Upon such termination, Lessee shall immediately remove the above-described aircraft from the airport. 14. Notices. All notices required herein shall be aW vaned to Lessor, in care of the Airport Manager, Denton Municipal Airport and, if to Lessee, at Lessee's mailing address as stated below. Lessee agrees to notify Lessor, in writing, of any change in the information furnished below. 15. Governing Law. The provisions of this agreement e a be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, 16. Binding. This agreement shall remain binding upon the h rs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the respective parties herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. LESSEE'S NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: REMENCE/BUSINESS- PAGE 4 CONTACT IN CASE or EMERGENCY : SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REQUESTS: LESSEE'S 9T=TME LISSUR S PAGE 5 NtMV'flt8 AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD August 120 1946 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DEWTON AIRPORT ADY.SOitY BOARD, TVESDAY, AUGUST 12, 1986, AT 6:00 P.M., Its THE TERMINAL BUILDING OF THE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT. Members Present: Carrell, Hayward, Xeith, Smith, and Wright Members Absent: Arno, Williams Others Present: Dante Ferrara. Clint Lynch, and Bruce Cardwell of the City Staff The Board greeted Dante Ferrara and welcomed his to the meeting. 1. The Board considered the Minutes of the regular meeting of June 10, 1986 and the special called meeting of July 8, 1966, A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes as written. Tho Board, at this time, recognized the outgoing Airport Manager, Clint Lynch. In appreciation of his achievements and hard work at the airport, the Board presented Mr. Lynch with a plaque,. 2. The Board considered recommending, to the City Council, the approval of an ordinance setting tie-down and hangar rental rates on the public areas o u the airport. A motion was made and seconded to approve the ordinance as written. The motion passed unanimously. 3. The Board considered the Airport Managers report as presented by the Airport Assistant. The Board reviewed the Revenue Reports for May and June. The Board suggested that a regularly scheduled check of the fuel flowage of the FBOV on the field be made. The development on the airport was progressing. W. P. Wills, the Consulting Engineer for the F,A.A. project, was on schedule and would have the design work completed by next week. The Board was informed that Bob Hunter had left the City and Joe Morris was the Attorney now handling the airport. Also, the City had a new Personnel Director, Tom Kl inek. Charles Willis was consulted about establishing the airport architecture, standards, rules and regulations for development on the airport. The Staff recommended to the Board that Charles Willis and Associates be hired for this undertaking. The City development of the roads and utilities will be pursued in a meeting with First Southwest on August 27, First Southwest is the financial advisor tot the City and will help pursue financing for the development. The Airport Assistant expressed his interest in the Airport Manager position and working with the Board in that capacity. Airport Advisory Board August 17, 1964 Page Two 4. The board considered any new business. The Board considered the Airport Managers position vacancy. A notion was made and seconded stating that the Airport Advisocy board expects to participate in the decision process in selecting and hiring of the next Airport Manager, The notion passed unanimously. The board considered the idea of individual hangar ownership as proposed by Port-A-Port. The Board reconsidered the Maverick Hangar building proposal, It was again tabled until the present situation is resolved. The Board expressed concern once again about the delays that Jay Rogers has had to deal with in developing his project. 5. The Board met in Executive session to discuss legal and real estate natters at 7:15 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 7:30 p.n. With no further business, the Board adjourned at 7:30 p.m. 0253k/2 1$~9L N0. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROHIBITING U TURNS ON U.S. HIGHWAY 380 (UNIVERSITY DRIVE) AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH HINKLE DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $200.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall make a U Turn at any time on U.S. Highway 380 (Universi~y Drive) at its intersection-with Hinkle Drive. SECTION YI. Any person adjudged guilty of violating the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY NAYOR CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE MEN CITY SECKETUT CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: i L page 2 of 8 pages TBM NU "U-TURN' SIGNS AT S.H. 380 AT HINKLE: Paul Iwuchukwu presented a viewgraph of the general area showing the T-intersection at University and Hinkle. Traffic from both approaches on University (the west-and eastbound approaches) have been making a large number of u-turns. 't'here are three major traffic generators on that approach - U.S. Bank, Clayton Royal Motel and the Gulf gas station down the street from the motel. The approach at Fulton would not be convenient to use for the motel. There would be no corner clearance for the driveway at U.S. Bank from the Hinkle intersection, Two things could result a right angle collision and a rear-end collision. The west bound approach would be critical for vehicles coming toward the bank. A u-turn movement would require more critical gap than a left turn movement. When people make u-turns, they are making them in haste not allowing enough perception- reaction time for approaching vehicles to make a safe stop. The staff was seeking permission through an ordinance to install "No u-turn" signs at the west and east bound approaches. Gilbert Berstein asked what would become of the left turn west bound lane. Jerry Clark said some modifications would have to be made. STAFF RECOMMENDED: Approval of ordinance COMMISSIONERS: Vivian Edwards made a motion to approve the ordinance. Virginia Gallian seconded the motion, Motion passed unanimously. John Tompkins asked the staff to look at other locations on University with the similar situation. ITEM #5 DEVELOPERS TO FUND NEW STREET NAME SIGNS: Paul Iwuchukwu said the staff was requesting an ordinance be passed that would require developers to fund new street name signs for new subdivisions. The rate of subdivision growth in Denton has far out- paced the budget for sign placement. A survey was taken of cities in the area to see what their policies were. The City of Arlington requires developers to pay a sum of $100 before final plat approval. The City of Carrollton, Plano and Grand Prairie require developers to pay for new street name signs before final plat approval by the Development Review Committee. Denton's problems do not only lie with funds but also with the lack of maintenance personnel. The Traffic Control Division has only two people who maintain traffic signs, e~a4~rs tv > u~ ~w CITY of D&%FTW DIATOM, TAM# re"I MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 1986 TO: CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION FROM: Paul Iwuchukwu, 't'raffic Engineer SUBJECT: U-Turns at Hinkle and U.S. Highway 380 A large number of U-Turns is being experienced at this T-intersection. Some of the east-bound traffic on S.H. 380 make a u-turn to enter U.S. Bank and some of the west-bound traffic make a U-Turn to enter Clayton Royal Motel or Gulf gas station. A U-Turn movement requires more critical gap than a left turn movement and therefore it is more dangerous, especially on a major arterial such as S.H. 380. Critica. gap is the amount of time it takes a driver to make a safe stop after perceiving an obstruction or impending obstruction downstream. A Vso, because this T-intersec ion is not signalized and there is very heavy traffic, on the major street (S.H. 380), these U-Turns worsen movemonts on Hinkle. The staff recommends that "No U-Turn" signs be installed on both the east-bound and west-bound approaches at this intersection. a 1 Iwuchukwu Traffic Engineer is 0413E J I77M 1►4 ~ooon~ F11 Ell 79 ~oooQ rAUM El 7 ooo❑❑oooa~ Ell -7 t " 114 K, r KLE / N UNIVERSITY 0 !F AY *4 . ~'a~W4ace4f4 -"A. ...~yl. . •wr"~'. wo U#* I EArfl~a~.H 1 _ .,4 r~ ari pnr WI"n4nr * tr$F,era d~;OL QUX. AEfRERr 0REEfE#t1M'MINNOW fRlll.., u r......... b,~ era,.... :il$ 1wM/r.: i A *...1 ..,,,,~,~E ;aim I ) MfM1t#ffr wre..,..r,rL~.~1i~k",Y,R✓....r~4S/.l'~~,1/ K . ,,t~~ 01 a, ~tlr, liwt IEO~ ,~+trta Yt~sE. ' ' i umrr ioEma fma fwr f«,or3J6~ fwf . ,N.LP,S~4 111EM ✓ I IF" As r fM rl!t}t dJ~ 11 .f/*!~//~' 11[lMII 1 { /t~! ~.....l~flft7 MAR. ..,p(7{/,r.. r. -1 no ? o r t .+A 111 not -y!'3 ,.:0.,.. ....,>.as'.~1..C1...>a, a...1 .a{A..sAi,; 3 ...,i . ❑ .0... I~.M... „ .7. ?'der . , ,,..r~J. WO 04 mom= Y ~4 , , , iK7 too" IM YOiIR P?VWO-IL$'I. . AMAOE TO ANY b F SON'S ►ROIERTY ! $250.00 OR MORE T# omkvfS QNO ` e p'"` t..t!irAs /cfr Q~...., A, ✓.I~SAE',Q. Nvl..S'E e7AW, ..........'rya cm".+1/~4i !~C IQ.. L RA01`bM OONREIIEIYTNM TO AOOf0E~11' , . • ' 1 i C3 o w.r wr rs.r.. n ❑ O r~yagrl ~Y IwL +l. C] ❑ r.w++ws ❑ j r eR C) O %ff o"r sA lw M rwr _ u O O t,rsry ws wr; Dow % wto tw* sor 11,O E]00MA w004mh dw, n.Cj C7 mllo W" r 1 f ❑ n wMiMw MIM " . n f~ My % tow N. ❑ E371. k D n as.tw twrrs %*w so* *00 Mw n ❑ ❑ a6~ fthow wrw• i r. mpow bm w 6 00 *C❑❑ r +y w r R 13 0 b M n 1!iMlt ~ d ❑ Mw lwn '1 l ; , Al i►.7. f.❑❑4e~M►w»rrMM ~i 0 t~/~l MwIW` Mt tYM a~ M few i $0 cktm fMt............` ..I.. l►rM.. ,fW.«........ I ff10M., wr...06144004 A6 « d lkllwr~,~3 U. .G.,.r..... a•" ~ ~1... X. s , f>Nfff►+Ee...r.. pIl~.....Gt~Q~D.:...,,.,..t..-t.3t-lr~,.,.,......« ~ s =T= 9A m ,r ~w r8+ ~1 Moft saw s ya , E ~ 1 ~tf 1I1M~M, 1 ~M~ i rrnrt m: A<M TjTrT We low M ~ r W,A- ' f ~ ow I , MO, MM111 IIMIM~ IAiRIt ~Mt MMII~. RN , r ' ~ ' t ' ,:o iy+?ti 1 ~ `i , ti ,y +5,1 ~.a.y-~. ~ ~t ~I~MY S~_ i~l!{ r, t'., It.,) i ~:h' ~.I ~t'. 'i t i1 r)'~'. 1 1 Ina UAWM w. ut IMNr wye 1► low Mi d w MW'~Illt ~M` R1111 NII MINIAN , * '•y 04, 1~ A4~MtlM1f" ANAL Mesa" / , Y roo It rs it x.17 r l ~ s, ~ 7777 . .nr. 7 1'Ce ,:.(t ys'. r . ,,r •nd .4i•. ~n! Jr,rl ,t+~,~ y.,r ly .q. 1 f'yt.: Fl "F r y .rl 1 ,)rr .1 y _ yrr7 JX ~ c _ r ' .r 1 Vin-: , ly 1 r { yi.r fr , y a 1 { da ~ o) r2 w ..u..r «r...... ~.......n r,n ,r u..._... , .w iwvr l ~+-...,.r 1 r'3o I , Lt 'izll i> iMfIdlf~ riUtiy e+tii ~ r' $rs ?a. titsA**% a w ~ r~ir awwrais>r w u.utr,t w. tUr, Of uow. Mull MrAm Fm 104" TO C3 0 MN M t111 1 Ir trlr. _ map, 0 tN ItM 20 woo uMt tat MtMJt ~t1 uwt._ art M+rrtr wt Ar M1 MCT01 C~3 Ff. O D 0 D M /r1AAwE TV" ML 1 t M i aw, tllClt MAAOAIt 111fA1A1101111~ Met twr. Mt. 16 Alt . "CCfld~lt 7". ~rft v' t11M1 ~ we ON. tart ratat r1. t wt ter; ~ N~P3 ,s Folio 1i /.II~,,, , ul yYj~? 77 INS POW t lla" 9.0 t+tCr iE1IGL~.~.iCpltAiMli Lew Ml1CM R U Iassm fdVM D qt IF MM. IItIM: e Mlltf , Va. 3 I M, i..4 11 nr . t nwi/r OMterwlt O MUTT AM o arl. ltttt, 1 Cs14 8 ,3v Twur MAN M,n LA mm&gW, y r TT 6 I mom V7 Sim Lxow Drr`~'Z~t9Si'3 r,/,/. UW W az M occ r TO STVbtWor uaaw p p . oRICa et ntt nMrtd rn pIp/MICtf ~1IMI mozzw owwtwA n N „ 101P tr rr~f =IT rtt r MERICLE/AMAU nw *SU N/ OPIUM RAW MO CCAVAN TO MOM" CTON ! i' "ATM [ r IN U MAU ~ CEICMIIt IIOAC CCMIrt1/Ni tMVt1tNATIt'f OiMNM► a~Mt1tM11 1 )1 t-MMtM rattT' iMA1K . iMI r1tiMMM "loa 1 t1Q11 v 11 4L'..., ' n it Nr M TMf tT W M UW 00.4 = n~obrrrf _ . o M win upoW YAMOAS W tY * YrJ~ifL11iY1~r fKN CrfAi1N . RAW, r.:.., MAMt ClYltr _ A inn AT rj AttT/It~ Zold lif IF Actwo I Gfl .~rRAMf4'. 7..~ L. ..I:vl It-Wpn rl h. l-rr :.q ro^et<"•-1IKAt :.r. 7Y ^.,A~..:'. E i ~ fem., ..~.y... , r- w me Mo of" few MR /M Im =MOW MMI M M r>tt r r A1r 1 IMIN MII/tM how so i OWN, RdNM x4so bMt Mf • IN tMM1U ►ilMrwMq rwf Irrr NJq MM rrwlr rrMlb a yrM sue, MrMemo M~b1 - A 4 W *1 1: Y" ? e.'c4um ~F~ a-. rYYI MMI. M. _ ~ 1 r;. rrj'S d4.~'!i d 3 ~Ak ~ F ` i~MIM ~M !IMI'' IrMIM v M 4~ ~41h MI~M. Mr~11.rY~ i/~u~~IM~~rIWI~, Iwaw r w.rl ~wlw w~ 1*tl rw r ,Nr..i, wtrrl r41IM It IMrL. IN am" Aft wr w ma _ A ~IIrIQw~ w ~rllrr M Pr. og o, * p f 9 gob a 1y f A M IR~P~11 _ IKi MIMIf Mi fW WON i; 1 MlIM III fwM :W or .yymay' Mos IIM~.~, MM XW Yrl w~n~I ' i • r t. y raw _ ~y vY~i1 i low, r 1 1f t cut eAwA~nwwellMlllMw+IMf1 tMfYAlflrAgo" Opal" "K? An to 1 M "m MAYAR n~II rf or low OIMAti11 M AA1 IIArr+rhtl {A"7A*11 AII,TIIMAt IMlf1 M OUIRAAI 0 MK MAl I i wiQ AT...Slop s'l.10.r..l0NiT..!! .T ~!.,~,d,N7~+V✓ed 'rro'r0 E i . L 1 + ,+v ~8kr ENE, a,,,.....4................ f FAMCSWMW n, F ii X,~ i ~IACtMMfelon"MA1t"go Af IM rinor t mar M1R 1. ~ 1 MM N~~ .a k AMw r A1111. w~ n. hIm a "w am. Awy lM M. r.Aw wr.I IoAr , It. Owwaft 41 VON* Y h "s Wow Room 1 11 St. F" r Mto" : f11M. ►M M A/IMMI 1 ICI N Tw WW r ftw d A . E . NO fto ~q{ , b. IMq r bow e LIM M. rim" fM1111 M, ~ one* ~M! w 12, ` !4 tMli h MA 41. ~MA~~ • wI Mr r g as" is $NWIN 1. ~ 014 T" h. ►MII i Ir1t N' brWw M. p11, - Cd tam a L& MArIw r M M urM ts. NM I$ fb~ r wI 1.;M~i v IN T~ ` e 1;Y+I=ry /1r r IMr MNk ttyNM~ M Mh1~1~ M, f y r i " ~wlNw~ ij' tMIiM ~ rh fry II~!!I . ~MMr~11r~ 1~ M~Mi1... 1 ' = e MN ON MW to 1s. I~ 1m ho few Owsm ~ Akio 31 F meet Mnwir;3"MU w ~w 1 M tI11AIpU~ M, hNli r AMI • A PwW r Imam" riot c l ~ h1 H' r1Y -il . IMAR IMIII MIME M'R ARtNMI1 M1MT $Td MI1, 1 H / y~~ ~of ~8"1 "Aftm Rw W ANA TR►►AOft AiLMRNT RoaaRR , , , <r.. , 1 wRlln ~Qu em U TM a4~ W • Atom /M mm" in IIMIry, ~ R d n ,.0 » ~ MIRA/ OTANM P" AMAMIff ThM Alm oft ! R M Ow "a Pill 11 liA1 8111 t r , JU 1)j W, A" M RR)t'Rlf 30 tupff dot wyMrlr -o FT. o C3 NR AY MIIM~IIRTIMI Din. M O O M M R1M hllAMi N MM. >IIIIM !IIAyIT A~- 1111!1 RA Ip, AC :awok RA9 -S A row I 'Off Woo ftv*fi Mole L... 04K' MMT u e e. AACE l • l in . 190"nw M110M RR l1RIaY[ RM1f1M M raw, No omm OF ~N. m' R11rYMR L1 IM MAIN MIYr RMINI~ =WAM TRA~ MRT SAM D 1ltAkCIiINT. G7 IMIRfMAN 13 \ "N' men, - , r. t • } NIIMII! t.. t : aw ~ Uum MAN.,.. I i ; ON mw uRMNR ~raR~`6~i`'+MM_Se~._ wr_roewAnRM L8/lR ' * 1qC! IINL'd M /1Af IIMIM M IrIO!/ICT► ~AIyIMM ~1NIIIIMII (3 R1I ❑❑1'd If.1y'1l. R~dy~iAM MNAM4TAA< ` 1 W AMIIAAMEE SA Y@IkIR iArA AATIIN loom to ITO TNAA i ` R' R CRINrtMM 1 1 1 ► i 1 1 1' j MRfAM 1 . 1 : ILtORMR A1A1011woR IMi1IfM'l NIUIIN~ UMrLM11T Ii1iAA/ L.L.L...J j,r,,*f 1+IUiMIN ~!/RR'T F{IIIli1 i~RT som MMM ~}y ~Mlt'AR1R fit'^!T i:r' ^•~T /R•1 14W / ry"MumomWM it US Aio1~11rAWLT MI At IiA~J:qt i MOM TO' M r ow ftw$?fAM1V?' )k trfle 'd Mo ILL 1 r RRT/N r AY M AeelRRrr . , 11~-I+qL' Q'Eyy'y„~y~-~-i Imemo" .ACCIIRMT 31 71 A', W11 Idlli~'Y~m IL~r 14rr,i F^, to"r'. ,p:N' ^^n4pt C' , P.¢; d•m, : pnr'q ,ter ..In. r:W.':n'~q!P. dnlF! u i , r f. n. iRi".^['3;_`~p.-~-^s~s5..:. 4^s.. . ~ r fig' :T.sr -•~y .e i wIt r11 tTllr IMIIMIII erw tll! wr TIMr t~lMtltT IID iw r+r r w .Mw a Pall N{{~pIMt~MMMIMriM ~w+M~ INIP tt ajolm .,mo 911. a.11 rMYfNlra•Mlrlrta if , Y, I' I 1Y g'w+~rN 'i,. *4100 ITM ~ r ar . ,oe a •a + ' . No"" . 40W 1 now" M 00" M 14M4 M u~lU *ft Y o"m m~MI~~ soML,z 46 44W" 041M ^ { . Nrl rK iagYM IIMa M. !00 0. 1 We l TAN ha, ' , par am =3 w ±!w 4" Mot ~ . '?i r,i `.i _ i r'. 4TH •1' ~ i ~erw l f l 111111. owl ALL SOYA 0 AlA M.; 0 ICCWMIt'{ KNN/MNYIIr1 I . e` ~ IIMIIT N 11{ ~ I IIMAM ti T ! i 71. 60 M ~r i, .I 9~11 mall ow Nwi Mfri,..: tA11AUT bIIMi ' tlw►s 04 C'i X IM MI WJM 77 + ~ i 11vt T{I t +NwMT !rM,M "W K" M pn~cN M WOW NO N M WIM ON" p 111! IMT T{11 sin , wM11+ lux "I.0 . M,C. Q n µ 1. 1 .C.AA.,,,44.Cb. .1~'~... ~6 f~J~ . . ,~1Xtk... p CC p.r.~ 7 . ~WP , ~ r4 6 A•a rri Alto C-4,4 kAOfA& ~~:~A!!'L' ~.'k'.~►.+f';4i'~r.i,. 1?tf~!~2.W..1Q,'tiA.. . ~ .l t,4S~,Qt. „ , fWW AM COMW" UM AAl nlvl~I AL&LI owl Wo t, Am" r Now • k am* H, 111YpIr IN t!rM1 1Mr{ r Tull M • 1Ma M II{ A. 111111 Y M 1rrNt+r1 IIIM M 47M IIIT • TAN M IV/arr. r rMl Mw M _ M'M[a1 r T~11 M~ • YYI l~ fiM11 M MMI MI~YIf .1 di N ft 11 wow C M" MM &M ~ yy~ IrM MOO of ~H " iMMW No" CMMM ld t~' ' tt. F" s er~F 11 r `NdwN Am M {w+i{ • "A !A , r Ti1rt►I~rr tMr MIWIr II a im T. MI{111rfs~ttl~1 f1. JIMan N rrlri~r~M 11 ►~M"wf~{woiMT1 111~Nt/~~ 1M IIr11Y1 t MI TA {fit ~ttl14. lYrl r Mrl~~ya M. ►wN1/ 1Y gMly • RM~1~1 MM 10 f t :put ri 11r~1 "sri.''1i wl~ 1iw fNiR All. at Ira M. ft" or =w Sued rlaalf~l~; j r rA1ry 11: ./r lrrl~aN rrwMW R. 1I M (1~1r IYr ~►~AM lllr► ` {IIj, IiiR ~ Ils. i O.. MM FM tow by M MrM11' r a ' ~ MMIN i • e, %'n ttitail l~ +9A = ,1 fimTaft,wT N, 1 11{ a* 01 M a1t111 r a gwwr~w~r NYIHetIM ~ IMI A r 4..-,. tl A1iMM y jl+yyl 7~L hflw&so1In►.,. N. 1wom rr1Y1 me T1l~aaseft . It too r 1Yr m • To owi mo ft" 61 vwft a ♦ 4 C1 ~ 'fJ r, 2F LYt".\ 1IM 41 • 11'~i l {Ifs. 1 ~ •I" F 1. r i/ ~1 1~ ! M1•V ply 4' 1' ~ Ix.• n 1' ix;:r a.~ a .a n., r... lb v>, .r 1, . 1RMM/MIIINIIMI t ~1IMr~MMtM>Itiyi,M}rN~,MrMp.A~ ` AM, 1 1 r a r, rani (Y yrr s.'+:1 r, a 'r r, , • 1 Y I r: w •r•,~. f ,r. , I, I . ZN Ot11 M 1/MM E tow i*m AOIMIw1 irM MMMRA,7 NiTi1MH 1 MMI MI1N Q O O M M MR.pEMI r 'Pa row, 1 ;T CAlI1tt. C7 y!i M~ AN On uiM 001, Ova, j ON OM lum 10 Nf Mr1 ctNM 0 rr. O Q O O w ow' S 1 1 w M NAL are NMAAt MIUNM AM* M MMAN 1M1. a K AIe. .wnMN. . 121Z W"' •1w1w. . ~m b 4 ►i~ I~SRf. rtI ,..yli it 1. c.~'~ ~-lae '.i.. r; MYMIMI 1 1 M Gi IWQtK~..!~ MM11 ,M1 MNIM'1 POW ~1SMNE ` llJr 0YyI~/E~~„-ip4..C.r.IL'i11MflM •r~ . ~ 1p~ 1 ~yy~~yy yy~1~y may; • , • i / MMMIt11MtIItM~lM ~ nwpl G "MCI Wi` b ,wlAUreutr o 1wasMwl d G O ' J rw A NQ 7w, fa 7AAo N~~~~ V Niles a.'. r r, rS1 . r wrS h G . %y~,`~'~~..fr';Ir •~ryv 11 II~~l.Li~e),~ /tf Iffm RJAIi111~~T1R~~ ma MAIM M m am 1w dOA1mv? LUM - O O Mt O 1M l1 MII, MWri ~I YMMtIrt UNK" eyEL V&VU IANA1 e R,►ni. WSU A N 0 NO r, Pow wimp rww« . MKUM UNA* 1-. ".y~►...` ouff 61MIMis, 1 1 1 ' ofto w wy awli Mt ~~N MN1M11 wow , cum LA , li~ I I I_""Aw 1d1LM/Noiw 64MIMEt-•a! ' 14W, 1 11 ! ' ~ ~ , I~M>A 1 ~ 7.IlMIw1 1 1 A WAA 1 yyFF n k rl = l Y.+..}V+Y t its.; 1" , P i i ! 1. N1 "M OF""$ go im AQpp~NP*041 MAY W*MM,M MW ~ Mtr IMt'lgfltl'i "IV a r 'v f1~f Td }.fro * r« :,-Ad A•J gffAm.1 ~'~FJ •7 e. l~m ate Ii. 7 u A r Now MM!!,_-• MF'ri""'r! ~L11'C~: aM~Mt+ZL~~ ~.d~. .,-~Ki A w, MAC. .-a iMt IMIMw Ir 1' ~ , . ~ r ' ' 11M! AAMMIN Af , • '.1 ' • } l _ t v I P N. ti ..i 1, •.1 i "r ~!s• I(l r.;. 1 r11 x. nt ,'v 1;"'JtMAI'~ i' Irn}'.A' A' 1N1d1 2" aM1.F 4✓tJ 1 7~ .°'d~ .b I.PM: bows sar Mr+~ !fir rMr hwfixim e O a 04 am* "No o 0 M" IW i L a . rwa w, ..;1 (i.'YA"7 my - Y 1 rr e. ~ $^'}i 1€ a i~il:ir t rM rI~M~YI r/1~'lM f"'jiiii (w Ilrtr, IM ~rr~! I~MM mw►. I, ~M . "Now T M N „t i rt M ;mlow"I IN! in! mll 141M WE i4w 1ltIM T AM >t ~ ~ 111M t MNM M /rr Ohl ~Aj ! p a,, ~r pb gal, • 1~ M i wpm ffqm~l T}1~ NMI !r< MR 1 MrN MI TiMI ; e ~III~ N +r n 1 I ; cow" IM Am MAC" fla" UKAL1/ ANMII WW An +r Ate]. 9': rr M li+ 1+ M11R{TIIATI! ! MAIMINI MMMM M MMAT MAMlII~ p AIIIIIINAL f11~Tf M !!NlIAlq WW'D M! tiM1} 1M ON ~►.!r.'`.!, ..sraPS ,4~',t`.,,.N.i.,.~~.IR,..pa~7., ~1~4.~.~1J~+~,c+rY.. "'r " W uN+v'~r..c,rY ~@.P.~1R1r~r...... PO ~'u~J LC P~-...A.wC'A ..L►►...ua~.u ~wr.+y. , . P, rAm..... LfeP5.. 4 -T1~.1r !1~~~, rn~A)G..... TO . ..-Mmt~). .RAG. +.t.t~i1,l111~{?~~.•1,7. 4Y~,~fiY.„~ U. 4.....W.1D, ~s .tV.lr tzt.Er,.y s i i w T."O _.STO....TP-A%jmw .4 i,- ski Al e Mtn low', NMI ~ ~ ~ , • ~ 1. rrrl M AM • llr~ Y !T. 1MM r TIM No • TrMI! U! a` . ~ K pow am" rllllAf~ r *rM M W r "W rM • Jii !U 1MN1 r ~rgl iw ! AIi11 •A~r r, ipE r~ g Mn -''i ■ riy1~•n!~!~ t} tyt erw'Mr ii • r:wr„!M!, it r A~l~r w r wMi~r Imma F" 01 cow A". own !~!Mlrr 1rq „1 s C wb amwo n ' x N r is 0 1, am iw tow rt Lff Trw u.w !1 IYr! r wr r to N rr l.. n 7w X11 Ita 11r r wi4 amok lyrr r i1r~N N t~w1 ! { O , wr t E wwwamma a N~ ~!wM lair r ,N`. wM I~r~r t 20, 6" Willow r ERMA . ft _...P, 03 _ !w!l.......~ .M~wr v r A rIN' M *re a fa' r N J.4 ..r ) a r 4 mel YAlll X N ~$~t r'N C3 0 i i e I t lII~IR't 141"W OOM tY i~ 1!1 M NYi to 4w. rri N .a a ttttttt~ 4 ` ULN&A .00 to M /tMN ' tttNlr i /0~R <Mt tYitM tNy Lfrllt Q d L1 M tMRAtt tItTAMt! /Mtl MIANItT riMtl Im"m tt t t • ~ 1... . ,a 1.. 13 A2" -I- Sam la laws 1 m.. 1111IMF~ ' wrr~►~I«rtwte w a R. Q o❑ d w N t t x IF WL MM riiitit ~iNiiNitltli ilNwt •i awwwr - i IM. 1~ K Ili. (0 At ZO'"} paw 3.r Nrwtt... N 1 tniew•NttiNNi~+iN w OM rt [ti, twaiNE w G 1I~M1frtl~lltlwli'' Nii~hrlN•th I<1MCMtiMT l w , • t (3 mm d ° +wttt+wN ° / Q(,Q U a1r~a J'~ w~ a~ N~ uaNn ` r ~ ' Nwt »t :.p • 1, UMMY o Saw G, j„ „ © tgpM1! AMt GMN11NNt ~tNM~i~M1M t MMMMI Now 14WLSO ~CI1~r i Mlllft f U ~ :wMim a f r AAMMA~ T'NNI , ~ ~ ~ ~i1at )iNwM r ~~wn► +n►e~!w T NI AT tM11 F -v; t• Q tNww r cons MAiI! . , - MIMM At Ali MIS M or Aft o~rpty" i11 1B' o: ~,r dwt : lY iE a.. r'>•a .rr,rrrrr.~ AM. .y7y'.' 4' MRr+`I f., .,,iNVaia+1 d. or) Wit ,v•,IA* Fr. 1 iN y VW "m - 0~ NOW dW 0500 IMMOOM 0 MOM @Wlft'%*W 000 0 *AWO 6~ 6 MOK OM W M&AM 11 NOWN.- W "0=1aft www ow. low m ow URI% RNIMPIL MIIWR is lj A""L alm ow AM *Wft" dko AV 0 W IF ow wm~ 0"Aw the, -tow ;00. Ao 4~ Lf W& A two 1 1 --7 I . 4 1 . . I . l.. I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ftwilmwo-faft"I K FEW or film" tow um w vN %No Lop OL go OL WW- in 10 ts k6ow vote age 6w •a ~ • r Ji" V' I Fr. .Yf H. 1 (10!u v?, Yv d f/,r ' ifISL 1 F:!lF t . r, ~ . ~ ~ d,Y M • .4M~Y WNMC, IUI ~111;,M~ A k*' •n+w+ ~i ..i.Y1rArW1r.Y5.W,W,~lai rr Pf~~7~li• ,vr r wag M ~ I wwiw. sr" awr a.. NIT I. T M1laMCt C) OL V I r w err r• w roe kft OF t ter w irk tlr+ a4 M I f 14 ill pc [ Iw Y , i . 1 _N A MM wMrt, 3Ts'7G' . , r »v~.ZRlt4 rM Mnr - R wwa . am- rl1rL/~ is r wtnt Cr C. P. 1 ievzo&i w kit% 0 C. Or" . ' j ~M~,yCf ~P/IEtll M 1U[ lIIM1M MI LMM n rq C] MRS M rM, MICME 0 ~ ,L I ~ w, wnw+raMar~b nuw o iwura~tr o ~MTwtw 0 wart." ' MMMt I MIA /s ..'I 77 um N INA ' UCMM Sam Rte,-L-...a0i.„IRiIMM1NIM N~ rr ` ` rl.. t 1llRM IR M o, I O rte' Nt ~~~w~~ IhlAlt~AhN Li NI J 16 J'. =lip WfW" toy r I .4 , ate OMNf~II 1 li.,.,.4t , . IMF, ~t (~AI111~M'4MMN r 1 I jW_ i~` I~M~M f~llww~~ ~I ~M~Iw~I ~1C '}1J rNFf hl ~ lrs,r aA/ll~urY t Be ap jr ; N~ Ralf ftkt t M To Alq M 's _ ra I vo I e,u„apE . I ~11~f~r Ir'~{ r Ndl `l a11, i tlyr .,ha F wrt aa S W b $NAM a Ia t 1 CIIMf ~rr~. r 410" ~ ~.r~rrrr ..rl~•'- CMA~~rrlrr+i . ~F ~ s pm~ tvM t /SS'' ,v lHt r } no :t% I.f , eF 'tl• rfa . tr -•LN f '.w4}1 awo AT am r Ci ' yk' wwww, Mt r Y1 F#n rtr4 t IIcT a r H w.,a,A 1_.O rraYC%to Al:a Rr re ~.1.'i r; Fz+#, wx. t rnx''.ti i, ,~Mf rr Y kIY :k7. m.4 I Ms*; 17 r r.- W'r CY 1, )Ohl KY~f X EsRS INN • N-•'M4 F'iF.xV4 I Y1y i r,77; .rtei.+r a " . a• p+v I . .~,x„e.w; a ~r•.y,R.f Owl- ~~~a~~ A~f~wM~111M1w~ ~•IAq iw111 A ~~111 Nr111M w"MM t 09 sub POM wooft M 00 ~i. MOM YMw JW dmw no-61 am OL KYt;;cg tl at bum *0 rMaIfMIMWAw~i~llll . . yy)~,y.,. . w 10 f YNRY 1~1~. mm"NowGiftw44WNW "pow : ULU. IM11 PAW MW P" low t ~P~ all e I ter ~ w 1 MIMr ~w lna S, ; ; r , ' s ~AO . • ,t~ .A'. rig: , , , 1 1~1 LC T CAriA1lYl1111t~W! IM~l111 Wr11111A1MIAM' : "a, T11! r pry r~ An ~ "is* wow, 11NM N ~1 tll L 11V wommon bwR11~ NOW ~ 41W r7j r I . RI' /1'4M~+1~.~'.~/~... UPKR~/AOA~ /I 21 G 110 TO FM" AN CON UM NO PIN"Woo-ig 'as .1 t~11MM~~ ru .-s 111 1AA M~ YI tAClr[O~Yw1 tNMlrgw 0 rAl~ }A i ~~ANII1~ t , ~ rm ~ WIIAL , ~ , n n A. MR"T Z i.+ .(II?'.~' oil i~',r, ~ 7 ~t 0~/1,. , I' Y~y ~ 1 l11,.~ 111AF 1!'~ IM. ~1~r~M- - \k i S >1 Mw lar' tIIM IwM Nw f 'r IM~ NII RR M• i ftwL; rdw Is ?"j f 111M p QkllR >a~~~~ S ~ 'r na.:.~+!e f MIp r MMM ~ ~ f MUIM~MMwMIy a~~ Am: r 11 MM FOR W. uM „T3. -tiOr 11 oq j s +S° . Ax "All 1 .N. E S v? ' - wrrWU!M"TIrM/MI .YYf. .i.r.yi~`~.~ \pm-..iM.q mot Isomm PM 1*1000 r 3 y ; ia+, Vt46~,'rf-Ard s~+^•! 'A%• gNtC.2nst. ii'xeoi yet.} tr! rf N • w i I iwlY. All eq.i_ rr ,I+sM•M { - ►►we r I ~ ~%P*Aft OW AN I r+~l ~ ' 111 ~ • • ~ 1.{ 4;1 7) + N` . ~wb V:.j 1 rN.r l~! I~.~YAI~ W appm 'iRi . ~yy •~N z IMF NMI UAW 410 Iwo tl~N~ ~~1 • rq.f gIIK11 ~ MI Now 6-col Y* umw 3.f ,)7 raM..r,l... M.,Mn... Snl lMwtibeii` • 71 7l mama ~IA ih trA 1 1. ..N. p.. :4 r ~1 y A4 dP N USM `"`1~~ r # T. { ~,.4 .t ' • y1L~t ./p. •1•'fT•.i' 1 {f . ? b .4 rle t.... u t N toe @ ..Aims.,.. N~~ r0R{: f fYf 'I ,N. m . lot) '0 DAMS[ 10 A1~Y OIIE fERS6M'S ►~01'iR1 LSSO.iIO Ofd MORSE O t; r ' ~AV >,,r...42tN., . !4?+rt.:,..,~ErKLI~. « rte, ~k M!O . e+ 1~~ a*~'?l .1..►+~.I~~..L,c}:~4!~1~~,~,.:~,r r,:~'Rrrr~l. r,~'!~1!...~kE:::wa~... 'u~l."".'•:.,.~~C~lrA+l~~::f IA 10.1. T~t .~I > N N• NN, .N N.....V..11~1/I... ~ /Y'f~'T ` 1~......WLI...•..;.A%~.al...rAP ~ .o►!~ .,t rN r~ l.N~~.... 1 ' Ar 1 d Old ....arr t R 1 _ _ i; o ✓ .r,. I N.M.»..... 1 NIIIN1 .......YNI......... • r. rr. rn S r pv W+.>ts i l ~ NnMw MY *0 t13 0bm&dmrr.srr 11~. Q yl a rr n k' y✓ rrrr t~~441MMMAbiWi kpQ 111 N "•'""y.. KI M 0= IL ~nrMwll~s+sirA r 11. Ysirs Mi Q D ~ it . E} 1+aAs lfllkrlA IN' <(!+b', ti r ;.1 1,0LJft1vW be ad So N.❑ {111 It, a MMM" 9 (3 0 M A* 4"W" Owft It "S" "mono Aai~iQIrw~lr+w..l/e5i~r .>i► 14Q 4' ,1.►.w,a,A,l.r: 1 ! +y Q u MIMMA woo"** r IIIY 11 PMIYIIr g!t., .,J*04114 .,...F:........!~l!~ r , > -"PT' N »N 1 w NW •ry {r{IT w{as rw real e.aa. TAN _ 40 ~~11,,11awa {►{i»a>`k..»...,'..,...N.N~~ .N all~..',i~a ..ci~.I..u,!b.,......... .{uo/ saw ~."yyi~ ye~~~yy ' N N , qtr i t } A((f > P~ aw.N ..u M.. w..L.. ~ PN J~ I. YI I• ~N) ! •r!lGN. f t•}~4•~•~2~,;:)f.~(+,~^~~•_ u.. w. y...~~..:.. . `~TYG .".1 .:...............N N..... Oft . ROW 4101"M I in I !d! Vvi } yam. now t rra car-mmaw AND AV memo MII~ ~Ikl~ MQI 1 3 III ice' ~1[ Mlt mom s 1 3 4 µr en M' ,a tn~ 41 Fl+i Jri~h /1k'trr 1 ' C t rIRNb!• J!n/~t✓ i S u;. 4 a low ,JOIN } ~I~ 'y.tYMd O&I ~astn e a )jk 1. f itn 1: q ~r 14 • lift y~ cowl 11,41"m Y ~ 1. f.. (1 _ r '1Ti I )f 4411U YWA 38)9 M ~ , ~ u.,4sa ~r MIMRIIM M ~Ia Mr NIA, La i 'Olt) ~ IOC/ow Alen►ottna. i ail ~rsan~/ ~raaS u0.0a ;.rsm~rs<~FpHS_ fe'23+7'l,^~t~", e>Yly?Sa11H:krr'~°N!= E t IF PAWILAW low me" w II~I~I PM AI~MML/MiM AMIIp ~ Mb ~ r - ' • t _ t4 A AQ" "XI j1111Mf14S y' 1EiY-1u.1 Mt,c -77 64 ,s•~. 4~ bai 7 3" ob , POW. 1004er 04 if# l .S ~f ) .r , 9M'rs 75, vi~f ,a "'?vWxT 5=r-r!wr'fa+z a=.`, R4 EY^:..r+-®zy*gy r. , w CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager FROM: Hugh Lynch, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Drug Awareness DATE: September 18, 1986 Denton Independent School District Led by Larry Mankoff (38i-3446) The DISD has taken a step forward by setting up a complete training program for their staff on how to recognize the drug user and what steps to take regarding counseling. They have written new policies, and every campus has trained counselors. The Denton Lions Club, Denton P.T.A.'s and Texas War on Drugs, as well as the Denton Crime Prevention Unit, are working together to %ducate the students of Denton. gh Lynch Chief of Police 4 • y4 1 3» a., v, Ah sr-'6 it y- i ) s •'R THE WHITE HOUSE U_ 7f~'r WABHINOTON September 21 1986 clef ni. Elfy ~e~rr~~rFrt , Dear Mayors Last month I announced six major goals I intend to pursue in a national crusade on illegal drugs in our nations ensuring drug-free workplaces= securing drug-free schools; ° providing effective treatment for drug usersl improving international cooperation to combat drug trafficking; strengthening drug law enforcement; expanding public awareness and prevention. If America is to rid her communities of this scourge, we must work together at all levels of government to make the use of illegal drugs unacceptable in our society. In many ways, the role of local government will be more crucial and far-reaching than that of federal government. I have enclosed my recent statement in the hope that you will share with me any efforts you are already undertaking to attack this problem. In particular, I would welcome your s aglina out and lettina me know of at least one sinesss, educational Jnstitution . Qr common ty- ased organization within_ onr~ C, ,n{ha has ao uccess seducing-the prevale ~a of #legar3-get As our effort proceeds, I look forward to active consultation with the nation's mayors toward achieving the goal of a drug-free America. I hope you will join Nancy and me in this effort. Sincerely, Enclosure MEN ;c--I nz .,w ....,..,r,.. ; R e 1 THE WRITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary or sane • ate Release August : Y 1, t I .r+khgxs. •y$Y Tax tPUrS I DEN'i' t, AND QUESTION AND ANSWER SRSSION WITH REPORTERS i ,.'h. ~ _ ~8rie~Lin Robes..: , 3tO~ p.X.'dDT THE PRLSIDENTe Good afternoon. During one o press cony'%renees as President, I pledged that fighting drug abuse "would tie 'a `"jCt' "11-'VSf ,:Ou9 adai'nietratidn* Nam*,-(had already made it `hi'r mil jtir1 te1t. I°"ai prood 4f-`:the enormous etiort, ,thst'r tksep; . made in"`tbd'sa ~.'1'a/t ,,5+1/1 years to t:tollow through an that,, P 9a Wet' 'Wagad &Otodd'figbto' Tlf4:~sii tiary;faaoss,i~sve Ors ~i ,1.Y,' reduced drug use by 67 percent. We've been on the offensive attaching the peddlers, the transporters, the smugglers$ the growers eiibtyofid wh6 is a' part, of 'the international twtwQrk, that channels drugs `into AAettca0't'nei'ghb0rhdods and e~oti'aunities.,.. Ars~sts are , confisdations arCuop cooperation with other nstions' lw~s incteas got sbah halt been aeoomplished and I • as em"usaged that so marl 'othats from every, walk,of life are. now Joi*J,6g,.;tbU ts, F>la. 'And `Y6t`- lr04,'u!e '"n'tiAlleat,and Iits -o#onsegaettees. soajatse,rso many oletiit ' in~l2~idia9 pcotfsi;ng yodng 6ttileteslr IaInol btimgigg sQa pw and h4irtb teak into bas~ts 'aotaiu~ our crountisy, ; DSgg ;usm ,,ths tsns, ;the health'''asfdl *Atety of,,millions ~,bf:Amerieansi , itr.extr,agts 4ahi#.A;;R0_ ;a:xs the dZS'#t of at Este ° aEamslag-~ from des ugs t the ; cost ~,*f ds,gg-ri0,2 health".2ft6ble"'t the cost a: in,')produvtjvityj the(,:ooatv,ja,~Mw„Qu6~,~ty, of Xii4r'ic lf -1Mand'fActUt6d goods its% wmc:aompeto ofii)tbe wwr)d ::N+►s(kg :rt cut most of all, the cost in lives. Druga, in one w#►Y !ox rthlr;pkar ;ace victimising all of use o w to4ays To; sang ®rg TA Am, Q tt,ta wls l be t!►e±finssfta~pe.-an art g a1i !'hat wa lfmpe stt' V*jV,1lta,*radicatet~,ftYAT~labnse..r~' I should point out that each of these goals inciuAes a n4rsabe df f 7 ides+al 1i ry, opt'ioelr flat I ;will ~1►eltti~pn- as we go along. got' as ytftti-kti4wy; hart:' always„insistad them W4b„step!i b!1; h~,,.l~~•act of a full di*cuss Lou, And, dsite,rwi.thintthe omrbs q Any final deeisione are made. So, I will talk today of goals an a number of specific steps, and we'll have further announcements in the very nea: future. But I want you to know that our announcement* will not deal 4r will deal not just with what government will do, but what all of ass will do and must do. 77 1 r 2 r For the key to our anti-drug strategy BY very reason `fdc being here this afternoon - is not to announce another short-term government offensive but tW Ralf, A*t444.,4ak; a national crusade merica of this against ,drugs a zinj tftut to rid society against this scourge by mobilizing every segment Of O drug abuse. Hut, as I say, the solution does not lie simply within the realm of governmrint, federal or state. It's time to go beyond government. All the awdimoott oni Land law enforcement in the world will not cure this plague as long as it is kept alive by public acquiescence. So, we must now go beyond efforts aimed'; Only;.%t;G affecting the supply of drugst we must affect not only supply, but Z •blzf~e~1'e we o.ve ;cow ttr►~ a~b~ e~ ~el .J~•4. ~c~~ are'Willing, to, sake. it~'al.ea trb~et X1-1 drug seµ41 'Muse" no 'li ra m.+ tolaratled.,' , a time ! .Mhen we ;.will take %hgse ..-*tnPf nedkss+lr to sidOA:sbricalof " Wa !deeply disrvptit*,;*g%4 s~,Ve evil. Soy startting today', bauvycrusade to 40ri4s tbR drag peddlers and Suppli,er&r Of 't'thtit anstamsers becomes Amer ica4'S ct%Agade. we , man . to reach out ; to the drug nser t a~ad we, Bean to Prevent ; btl~tr s from becoming userse our goal is not to throw users in jail, but to ftoo'th" 'ftoo dtudsl:l1,We Will, offer a'belping;baudt but we will also pt"'dUre tyre VMW at -school aed is► ,the. wotkp~a4o~A . ~ st;44494*011ugr to ¢et°rdl n.+ ttiiwii,l<r+eftiN'a ILet dsnq. usesti q #e► JWOOTiRFAon otb4rat'Jim',`will, f nsLotr 'telex tsakeT,respoANib litY '~~#r th* i~ RlmA r,., 1, aotldht,;"Aw finally,~yet,Ifi,rst andogossagiatr wR;,MixxA.0tP metiss+ge ito t1W pdnential met bbat drug..use fwild. , l4~!g!F`; ~ , ! tolitit t.bak ttbey-,musts :leam to, "3ustsay;! Po•o ,,N+~Y;:rspok!1 kl~ose wCfrde in'ciilkLand -QaLiaormis`` jusar,a "#ew:: yRa#s sQq RA 1, , Yt.s.F s e eie nc~~yt,iy l"tCe`'tbas 10im 4just"Say' CP alubp awnj,,;Pognmg l9 P! D. e all 'adi+d'attf'lt~lCima~i'f r. I? ;,I 11 f'i If this battle is to be won and it must each and every one *fit as, has--to take' a stutd'and get inrolVedL , Leadership and eomait"Nit:'ghostt,Ibci*viderit, not- Only in .tbowlWo v u*#" , j* ~S4~ate Souse, but also in the pulpit, at. the work at4lry.i3k, t#ms:,amn„.. in opt schools, and in the mediae lf,~w'ate to- defeat this sn~my~ ..we'Ye; :49t tD :?o i k' as; one ia,us~pose, ~ahd': ittedtp~~giotr4~.tX• ; pei la jl toiliithsi' aniteid (,p I vidt6iy in, this, aawAtt af' draqy~fr:e ger~ratit~n• :r';, i , l.i;1(:1lf. ~9i~.•E113 26~f f~`)b~ F(SY'. q J :lY~,t'r•i iifE .';I f~Sl'J11:f O fl i s o .1L`.S If1 w'C,!'t ~W; Jt~'i J ~..tW .ZfI'rfl;lt`3'1VtJ[t f.l~ 1 {-,f (Y! rsf.{ tilt: C.'.5:') .(f ~1Y E';i+.':iila ~J ~S l1f11 1('j k'.. C1 `r' r f 1:i tax - 3 , country grsderstsnd that-OnfI tbl. .~hoee.whc: knr. khl,g American people not their' aind01- ti6 "i6lwihiko t0att: t~::~aotbillg,~!e can't &Q#o*8Xiso1• Precg A4y p*esuse. the realizstio>s is finally : takisgf=bOI4I thAt drub testis obt'hdit'ift; ne'ighborboods, and faniiiet,,-k1~e time b# ~d0" #o~ s n tio;►►a'1 Mobi~lisstiots, mne,_'tbak striklst ear, at IF b1k,k t ` ts! th'elrleu. Io., ag re r 3uagad our'tirst' strategy a klder:~l sulk+gY,•. x1vi; ld. .i n{! Adot it" a hatitanal strategy. 140% "ptoo 81. * s `trot o~tid4L ipgfl aik iriitfst'i~i:toi ui~4 Pa,, wbht:, ve! ve 0c0 uir tdw&kd 'a druq**ltreal, :AAex ica,., . P~, ~P~. =r~~dr • 1 Out. !list gbsi` is to trsek a drug-'free worhplaw fat e1X 1►s~erialpi.` r Yx"rY .a ki rus, is 'h6o td-' bo prate"; woslr3~r►gr. P!P-Ple .kk dad bt; ic..an , t~O nor` ntr 'tlsi prdducbiwiby ol1(oW,XQWt.4R`YR 1 is particularly i octant'"t3ritt "Obektt'i1 lit "naisiwi oceupsRiau R clear-minded and tree from thee" iflifti" tit' 1111e40l, Atagavo 10, scscvsp this M1 to create Pr o ses a drug-free workplace for all li, ~ , feral ~ l0at t0, en~itiegi"ft'ate Ind local' goverment to follow the feger," 9014, t4 OSI s~'lits ttt sotiait acasits"at~s:;ttoa,, , goaess lnt., aonk~ Ctdrs to `ast bush d~tuli trod work mobil ed~►lroas Mfs Eto i dd f':bbr' vadtrft in t1~e prLwate sector ; 91;19, mobil ~ t M! A=* proi#1 1 this 1 ~ "t> r<:. t,r a, Our' second goal is deuq-free sebeat$ # fsoe+ -grule schogis through uni~gere kier lour za jbr steps are being cans.ide red's eniis ing, tbe.,be p of local eduestbts ands school offiai&lst,rak#q- qes l te *ra ; lhirs agiliditt diettiWitlAg dtugs.rlA==qr, nnt+F 3,,! scbobis ar kinowri tied 'irsydtenth'''i~► CoOphtat,lolrtni#h, 3e + , s y i;pies encouraging local school districts to, 6*0afid theLa'idx,~l.g #AeseU;e ; educatipn;as rk of on overall health curriculuxt ^*'...ng a ,,oc"i anat. r 1oc and''stafu e~b1►Mrntseht to xeguiei. schools within their;:,] e ' . to 04,%dtug-fx i. ~ Ra2fb dnnoeirK ~poseio, by drug's are inorelf in9lY abbai the public io, pra ,id~en li t¢ 'g !v.o,~*,invq v~ lpdrugs 'ata t'rosted`. ThrN, steps +atio ug4o;+1,13 , cocald•;ati,otls, ` e'ocottri tho iitates and casrswniti*S "ta Akvolop . ~y~yy~~ et si of is dl` elated heal tW.pzob>x rtrr, i `f .1 .-'il i .3 :"7J4 ;1; i 'S`:~4• .i. td k~ ,1 .'=(1';. :311 f, ;.l Y .r rgrk[ :4- impgavi resaiscb its h4RA4h-zl,;ated areas, including drug testing, bo st"JAq-- medical, 11apd. #.04, b,,,V> o"q `sited'at' prOv"tion, lbartb~is i~~~~~ioua.~ o4wPl~dtida. Ni txat'-twildor:, what weave already a 1.4ahi t.,a to b. dh'w ll,'. ttrlijiAbis)year I raised the priority of druq,OU f V d$dlar 04 i'C a thireaht`>tb fiu national security. Now our goal ii nothing 1446 tin thi'~fu'13 and active support and cooplratioo; of,,,#a~, ,VWA , w tb which the United states Mdlt:..' lc: to de#~at, 10 Or ' drag i ficki". To a ire biat oao~l b ah ~ theirs 'No can } t#►k ~~yt~~' e!"tffitkllsw lit and lffOrsiii is+'atisslnq,': or attackiq rn~tobtJi J the o,oznreer continue Vice President iui s inii i ~t +>fN-to"irtit+teae'i~ t.In wppart given -by; thee. United $t4"*. ■tili,tary to, dr law unftnrdeft oft opt ions wh4~oq~ i ap~sgpr' atet~' is si efforts ,J y~~~ ~r 111 K '~.j1~ tb `resat 'naxioos Ni pticlt bsyolo ''by furs " d Y. transaet'iaus'!aoAdufto4 ;wig 4r+~ ~e7f• J ' +tyur, ti f t h goal is st,F.+~ngxheAirp$ XaM eri'lbrteme~ft : P"hiMlt if` agsin -vuarh has beeo~: aco~lish*d, bit, r,r► . caA ~~ild ' 4 dzq.tk► tsil 0*$id slue! of ~,Pu 'poM'. Tho $C+41~Qs+# &-it r "0 , ~ ;o! thins insisting that the criminal ]ust severe punishment to drug peddlers, the big guys and trig'°IiteleAqulyss direetirnq law adfordewent otwrdinatisng coamittees " U.s, attorneys to prds d ate ttnoso who sell 4rvgs Or O a 4 ty to the fbliaet extant of the , lawn i►n#tsvpt a the, Yis~ ~ pt l1 ` t' arid'' Att6t"Ay-1 Clewral to orcpedite,a:o olopst n f c f`,66r+ tb& ~t~l,'; bb.aet, tsomPla ltliyti~! Ff00 , ilM&l ,drug entry WA ohs ; United Qua z t ca %%a, sixth goalz, i+► ; pr.islaty. Ne , jw#t J p awareness ' and prevention. Now, w.' ye,,,g~►!M a {fix' "fi`~t Attit~ndus are changing, so now ire the t me to ern ~ib4ii' whd" wa; havx- yeti to' 'loin .the fight., Noda t#*, bYj, tehinq out to all 4'~ ~ awareness and Aixr!ic4wh' , ,rod askiagr thnep t:o+ Jot 1 preventidit cafrpaigos, ,taktrtq a Mtaad: in .oysry ,oA i; i1i'lsge in this diamtry andf mak4ag aeg a►ia„4;r! ~ ~ rnd~t'i d'tii~sir binge.: 1.. i itair~~r fellow citao+rns- credible and accurate information about tine da id' h!~`t3ya Users should know we are concerned, and understand there is a legitimate reason to be concerned, sn these next few weeks, the administration will be preparing for an action campaign, based on many of the points I've made here today, to be iaunohed when the kids start returning to school in the fall, go this is chapter one, more to come. And thank yon. fi 1S97L N0. AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THc" EAST AND WEST SIDES OF BONNIE BRAE STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH SCRIPTURE STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH BOKNig BRAE STREET BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 P.M. AND 6:00 A,im,; PROVIDING A SBVER,;s:'i,ITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a vehicle between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. upon the following street in the city of Denton to-wit: The east and west sides of Bonnie Brae Street from its intersection with Scripture Street to its intersection with Bonnie Brae Street. SECTION II. The provisions of Section I prohibiting the parking of vehicles shall apply the times specified to that portion or part of Bonnie Brae Street designated therein except when it is necessary to stop a vehicle to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the direction of a pol♦tce officer or official traffic control device. SECTION III, Any person adjudged guilty of parking a vehicle in violation of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), SECTION IV. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holdinj shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions o this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986. RAY 8TEPHENSp MAYOR CITY uF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN~Ci 7 SECRETARY CITY OF DBNTON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY Ala PAGE 2 page 7 of 8 pages John Tompkins asked Mr. Moore why his were on the street. Mr. Moore said the lots were so small and the driveways so narrow that a truck could not maneuver, The trucks would do more damage and spend more time than they presently are. Mr. Moore said Jackie Doyle with Building Inspection Division encouraged property owners to pour concrete pads at the edge of their property for dumpsters. The parking congestion was making it impossible to dump them. STAFF RECOMMENDED: No parking remain on Fry as previously approved by the commission COMMISSIONERS: Wayne Autrey made a motion that the staff recommendation be accepted. Vivian Edwards seconded the motion. Motion passed with Vivian Edwards, Wayne Autrey, Mike Amadore, and Gilbert Berstein voting in favor of the no parking ordinance on west Fry street. Virginia Gallian and John Tompkins voted no. ITgM_#7 NO PARKING ON OLD RONNIE BRAG AT THE WEST END OF MCKENNA PARK: ~r Paul Iwuchukwu said a petition was received from Ms. Doris Gray of 1300 Scripture and the Denton Parks Department requesting that both sides of the section of old Bonnie Brao bordering the west end of McKenna Park be designated "No Parking" between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. She complained that some individuals make a point of coming there every night to drink beer, play loud music and yell. She has called the Police Department frequently to disband them. They litter the streets requ;ring the City to clean them. The quality of life for the occupants of that street is being jeopardized. STAFF' RECOMMENDED: Approval of a "No-parking" ordinance as specified above COMMISSIONERS: John Tompkins made a motion to approve the staff recommendation. Mike Amadore seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ITEM M8 GENERAL BUSINESS: A: Obs ruc~`tion it Sunvalley and Buckingham - to be presented at next meeting 3 ••~No ~ 1 1 o 4,e,1~4 '4400"4 kxt4 .,cd ~c.~`a lle mac., tom., x ~ W r ~LCICx 1~} MO/lTl~ l120~ t } ~ SIDS 1fgT ilDi =il/'! i2'D~ t } M~Na JIDOII~a FOR AQMM 1`~ MY of DANTON Dwnym, rms 7eso t MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 1986 TO: CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION FROM: Paul Iwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: No parking on old Bonnie Brae from Scripture to Bonnie Brae on both east and west ^ides of the street A petition has been sent in by Ms. Doris Gray of 2300 Scripture and the City of Denton Park6 and Recreation department requesting that both sides of the section of old Bonnie Brae bordering the west end of McKenna Park be designated "No Parking" between 10:00 p.m, and 6:00 a.m. Her reason is that people park there during those hours playing loud music, yelling and carrying out vandal activities. This occurs on a regular basis and the police have been taped upon to disband them on several occassions. Presently there are two signs in the immediate area that say: "Park closed 10:00 p,m, to 6:00 a.m. - Ordinance 15 - 8". The Police department has said they cannot enforce these signs. To allow the situation to remain the way it is would require the City to hire additional Police that would be patrolling this area every night to disband these vandals, No harking" signs have always been effective in solving this type of problem. When tickets are issued one or two times, it discourages most offenders from violation. The staff recommends approval of the ordinance, Paul Iwuchukwu Traffic Engineer 1s 0413E FILJ oo°~i~' o~ L~~Q C71 El~oLJy ~ALSY Li L oo~~ooooo00 oar r7 rm-1 - VI T7 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, -FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON z CITY OF DENTON : WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable that Notice of Intention to Issue Certificates of Obligation be given as hereinafter provided. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONi Section 1. That attached hereto is a form of "NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS", the form and sub- stance of which are hereby adopted and approved. Section 7. That the City Secretary shall cause said NOTICE, in substantially the form attached hereto, to be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, the date of the first publication to be at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date tentatively set for the passage of the Ordinance authorizing the issuance of such Certificates of Obligation, THE STATE OF TEXAS a COUNTY OF DENTON c CITY OF DENTON s NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS THE CITY OF DENTON, in Denton County, Texas, hereby gives notice of intention to issue CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION in the maximum principal amount of $500,000 for the purpose of paying all or a portion of the City's contractual obligations to be incurred pursuant to contracts for the construction of improvements to the City of Dent,ion Municipal Airport, to wito additional access roads and utilities, and paying all or a portion of the contractual obligations for professional services of engineering, architects, attorneys, and financial advisors in connection with such improvements and certificates of Obligation. The City proposes to provide for the payment of such Certificates of obligation from the levy and collection of ad valorem taxes in the City as provided by laws, and from revenues derived by the City from the operation of the City of Denton Municipal Airport. The City Council of the City tentatively proposes to authorize the issuance of such Certificates of Obligation at 7:00 p.m. on the 2nd day of December, 1986, in the City Council room at the Municipal Building, Denton, Texas. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS By Charlotte Allen City Secretary 1S90L R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, on July 25, 1978, the City of Denton ("City") entered into a contract with the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation ("State") to procure right-of-way for the construction and extension of Highway Loop 288; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said acquisition and construction, ARCO aide Line Company ("ARCO") is required to relocate Its pipeline; WHEREAS, in accordance with said agreement, the City is obligated to initially reimburse ARCO for the actual cost of the pipeline relocation subject to reimbursement by the State for ninety percent of the eligible cost for relocation as paid by the City to ARCO; and WHEREAS, the actual cost of the ppipeline relocation is estimated tc be in the amount of $52,960.00; NOW9 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized, in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid contract, to reimburse ARCO Pipe Line Company, upon completion of the relocation of its pipeline, the eligible actual cyst for such location, the estimated eligible cost thereof being in the amount of $52,960.00. SECTION II. That tnis ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986. RAY ST NSI MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: GRGEOTTE ALUM CITY SFCKETA1Y CITY OF DENTON,)TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL 1ORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCII, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: V' t~ ( ± SEP 1 t 1 086 I COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF WGRWAY9, . FNOMIEER DgiEC70R ROBERT C, LAMER. CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OMOK 0. GOODE ROBERT M. BASS P, 0, Box 3067 RAY STOKER, JR. Dallas, Texas 75221-3067 September 10, 1986 Utility Adjustment, U1-2053 ARCO Pipe Line Company Denton County CSJ 2250-02-002 8018-1-57 SH Loop 288: From US 380, North and West To West of 17M '128 Mr. Lloyd Harrell City Manager City of Denton 215 Fast McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr. Harrell.: We are pleased to advise that the subject Utility Adjustment is eligible for State cost participation, You are requested to advise ARCO Pipe Line Company to proceed with their work, A few clays before they plan to start work, they should furnish written notification to our engineer as to the date when work will bertn. Likewise, they should furnish written notification as to the date when all work has been completed. Written notification must be furnished to our resident engineer advising him of the time and place where he may inspect materials removed from the project which are to sold as scrap or disposed of as ,junk. Prior to or at the time of final billing, we will need executed copies of Form D-15-24A, Utility Joint Use Agreement, Mr, Dwight Bird is our engineer in charge of this project, He may be reached by telephone in Denton at 817-387-11114. His mailing address is P. 0, Box 2023, Denton, Texas 76201, Mr, Bird should be contacted concerning any changes in the approved work, ours very tr ly, Robert L. Yie di g District Eng ne r AW cc Dwight Bird w/attachments , I yea - or. Tl~t.,~+onr 3tb 331i3J',. ~ ~ 3 ~ !g~ Land t r i;h5 of Way June 25, 1986 State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Attn: Ms. Ann Kuehn P. 0. Box 3067 Dallas,, Texas 75221-3067 De~Ms. Kuehn; Re; Relocate approximately 600 fset of 8-inch pipeline and install approximately 350 feet of casing to accommodate extension of Loop 286, J. Coltart Survey, Abstract 288, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas. Our File; U. D, Job No. 180. Enclosed for your further handling are five copies of Forms D-15-Ul and D-15-48 which have been executed by ARCO Pipe Line Company. Attached to these form: are copies of APL's easements pertain- ing to this property and APL's estimate of cost, in the amount of $32,960.00, for the subject adjustment of this pipeline. Please be advised that the rights obtained in the Agreement Amending Right of Way Easement(s) dated February 4, 1986 (Listed as No. 3 on page 2 of the Af`adavit) have not been exercised, therefore, it will not be necessary to relocate any fiber-optic cables. This Company would, however, like to reserve the right to install a cable or cables at a future date. As I had discussed with you in our phc•, co!iversation on this date, the Utility Joint Use Agreement (Form D-15-24A) will be executed and returned for your handling after this office receives a resolution from the City of Denton stating that the City will reimburse ARCO Pipe Line Company for the total actual cost in making the subject adjustments to our pipeline, Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter and if I can be of anv further assistance, please call me at (316) 331-1300 Ext. 608, Yours truly, BILL SMO T BSre Lr,c. J State DepErtment of Highways and Public Transportation June 25, 1986 Page 2 CC: Mr. Lloyd Harold (W/copy of Forms) City Manager, City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Mr. Rogger Wilkerson.--' City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas. 76201 Mr, V. P, Driski Mr, F, L. Neeley, Attn: C. A. Staton Mr. B. J. Murray (W/copy of Forms) s