HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-09-1986
F1 cotro dFi
C~ oar t~~ON
~4Ec 9 8
~
AGENDA
CITY UP DBNTON CITY COUNCIL
December 9, 1986
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
December 1986, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
1. Review Senior Citizen Opportunities Committee
discussions.
2. Receive an update on City Council goals:
Goal # 9 - beautification
Goal #12 - user fees
Goal # 5 - City image
3. Discussion of contract for leased office space.
4. Receive a report on automated voting by the City
Council.
S. hxecutive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 62!;2-17
V. A. C. S .
b. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.C.S.
C. Personnel/board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.C.S.
Regular Neeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
December 9, 1986, at 7:0U p.m. In the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of August 5, 1986; the Regular Meeting of
August 19, il~86; the Special Called Meeting of August
260 1986; the Regular Meeting of September 2, 1986;
and the Specl.al Called Meeting of September 9, 1986.
2. Public Heartngs:
A. Z-1838. Petition of Bellaire North Joint Venture
requesting a change in zoning from the
agrtculturat (A) district to the planned
development (PD) classification and approval of a
detailed plan, including the preliminary plat of
Bellaire North Addition, on a 31.5 acre tract
located at the northwest corner of Audra Lane and
Mockingbird Lane. The property is further
described as a tract in the William Lloyd Survey,
City of Uenton City Council Agenda
December 9 1986
Page Two
Abstract #773. If approved, the planned development
will permit the development of 135 lots for single
family use ranging In size from a minimum of 6,000
square feet to a maximum of 17,570 square feet. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
planned development zoning and a detailed
plan on 31.5 acres.
B. Z-1843. Petition of Richard Cushman requesting a
change in zoning from the single family (SF-7)
district to the general retail (GR) district on a
0.913 acre tract located on the south side of
U.S. Highway 380h (University Drive)
approximately 350 feet east of Ruddell Street.
The property is further described as a tract in
the J.U. Lilly Survey, Abstract 762. If tho
request Is approved, the property may be utilized
for any purpose permitted in the General Retail
district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
(The- Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
denial.)
3. Consent Agenda:
Bach of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purcha,c orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up Information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 4.A0 4.B0 4.C). This listing is
provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to
discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Bid # 9670 - CIP Utilities Section N (included
are Texas Street, Austin Street,
Schmitz Street and Willowwood.)
(The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
Bid 0 9672 - Retube feodwater heaters
Bid # 9674 - Utility Pole Treatment and
Reinforcement
Bid 1 1675 - Power rescue tool system
Bid 9676 - Modular computer room
81 0 9677 - Police sedans
City of Denton City Council Agenda
December 9, 1986
Page Three
Hid # 9678 - Pickups and one ton chassis
Bid 0 9680 - Uniforms for City employees
Bid # 9683 - Liquid ferric sulfate
Purchase Order #76529 to Wang Laboratories, Inc.
for annual maintenance service in the amount of
$20,880.00
B. Plats and Repla.ts:
1. Consider approval of preliminary and final
replat of the Victoria Square Addition, Lots
1R and 2R, Block 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
2. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the
Northwood Gardens Professional Office Park
Addition, Lot 1, Block A, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the
Skyfab Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
4. Ordinances;
A. uunsider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment„ supplies or services.
8. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements,
C, Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance; with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids.
U. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
issuance of Certificate of Obligation for airport
improvement4 and all matters incident thereto.
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Chapter 10 of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Denton, Texas, to provide Cor the adoption of
the Uniform Fire Code, 1985 Edition; providing
T
City of Denton City/ Council Agenda
December 9, 1986
Page Four
for amendmients thereto, repealing certain
provisions of Article ill said chapter
relating to the powers and duties of the Fire
Marshal; repealing the provisions of Article IV
of said chapter relating to liquif.ted petroleum
gas; adopting a new Article IV e..tftled "Alarm
Systems", to provide for the installation of
smoke detectors in certain dv!elIfng untts;
repealing Article IV ("Burning of Trash and
Rubbish Restricted") of Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances; and providing for a penalty in the
maximum amount of $1,000.00 for violations
thereof.
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the number of persons authorized to be employed
in each classified position in the Police
Department for the City of Denton, Texas; and
repealing alt ordinances and resolutions in
conflict herewith.
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the office (0) and
commercial (C) districts to the planned
development (PD) classification and approval of a
detailed site plan on a 20.550 acre tract located
on the south side of Audra Lane approximately 300
feet west of Loop 288. (Z-1813)
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning an
unused portion of Mills Road and Price Road
located east of Trinity Road and being part of
the M. Forrest Survey, Ab3tract No. 417. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning a
drainage easement between Lots 16 and 17, Block
h, Northwood Estates Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
vacating certain utility easements located within
Lot 1, block 40 Southridge Bast. (The Public
Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval.)
K. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
vacating certain utility easements located next
to the Paige electric substation. (The Public
Utilittes Heard and Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
December 9, 1986
Page Five
L. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
vacating certain utility easements located within
the Gazebo Apartment complex. (The Public
Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval.)
5. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution affirming
support by the City Council for the Services
Program for Aging Needs (SPAN) application to the
United States Department of Highways and Public
Transportation for assistance for Nandi-Hap,
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City of Denton to apply to the Texas Rental
Rehabilitation Program Fund for federal funds for
rehabilitation of privately owned rental property.
C. Consider approval of a resolution approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and the
Denton Independent School District regarding the
use of common polling places for elections.
6. Consider appointments to the Flow Regional Medical
Center Board of Advisors.
7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
8. Consider appointments to the Flow Memorial hospital
board of Directors.
9. New business:
'Phis item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
to. official Action on Executive Session Items;
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel and/or Board Appointments
11. Discussion of status of transfer/lease of Flow
Memorial Hospital.
12. Executive Session;
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(eArt. 6252-17
V.A.C.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V,A.C.S. (see item Olt above)
C. Personnel/Hoard Appointments Under Sec, 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.C.S. (see item f8 above)
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the t~} day o£, 1986 ato'clock
(a.m.) ( ,m97
2476C
CITY COUNCIL AGIiNDA ADDENDUM
December 9, 1986
1. Appearance by Mr. Louis Smith requesting City Council
endorsement for a celebrity golf tournament fund
raiser. -
C h k T I F K A T E
I certify that the above notice of weeting was posted on the
bulletin boa at the City all of the City of, Denton, Texas,
on the~~ day of ► 1986 at r ` o'clock
(a.m.) p. )
2476C/7
AGBNDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
December 9, 1986
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
December 9, 19869 at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 P.M.
1. Review Senior Citizen Opportunities Committee
discussions.
2. Receive an update on City Council goals:
Goal N 9 - beautification
I;oal #12 - user fees
Goal # 5 - City image
3. Discussion of contract for leased office space.
4. Receive a report on automated voting uy the City
Council.
5. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.C.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.C,S,
C. Persunnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.C.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
December 9, 1986, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of August 59 1986; the Regular Meeting of
August 19, 1986; the Special Called Meeting of August
26, 1986; the Regular Meeting of September 2, 1986;
and the Special Called Meeting of September 9, 1986.
2. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1838. Petition of Bellaire North Joint Venture
requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) district to the planned
development (PD) classiffcation and approval of a
detailed plan, including the preliminary plat of
Bellaire North Addition, on a 31.S acre tract
located at the northwest corner of Audra Lane and
Mockingbird Lane. The property is further
described as a tract: in the William Lloyd Survey,
y of Denton City Council Agenda
December 91 1986
Page Two
Abstract #773. If approved, the fanned development
will permit the development of 15 lots for single
family use ranging in size from a minimum of 6,000
square feet to a maximum of 17,570 square feet. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
planned development zoning and a detailed
plan on 31.5 acres.
B. Z-1843. Petition of Richard Cushman requesting a
change in zoning from the single family (SF-7)
district to the general retail (GR) district on a
U.913 acre tract located on the south side of
U.S. Highway 3808 (University Drive)
approximately 350 feet east of Ruddel.l Street.
The property is further described as a tract in
the J.U. Lilly Survey, Abstract 762, If the
request is approved, the property may be utilized
for any purpose permitted in the General Retail
district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
denial. )
3. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda, Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 4.A, 4.13, 4.C). 'Phis listing is
provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to
discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Bid M 9670 - CIP Utilities Section N (included
are Texas Street, Austin Street,
Schmitz Street and Willowwood.)
(The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
Bid N 9672 - Retube feedwater heaters
Bid # 9674 - Utility Pole Treatment and
Reinforcement
Bid M 9675 - Power rescue tool systom
Sid Y 9676 - Modular computer room
laid 0 9677 - Police sedans
City of Denton City Council Agenda
December 9, 1986
Page Three
Bid # 9678 - Pickups and one ton chassis
Bid # 9680 - Uniforms for City employees
Bid # 9683 - Liquid ferric sulfate
Purchase Order #76529 to Wang Laboratories, Inc.
for annual maintenance service in the amount of
$20,880.00
B. Plats and Replats:
1. Consider approval of preliminary and final
replat of the Victoria Square Addition, Lots
1R and 2R, Block 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
2. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the
Northwood Gardens Professional Office Park
Addition, Lot 1, Block A. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
31 Consider approval of preliminary plat of the
Skyfab Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
4. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids.
D. (;onsfder adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
issuance of Certificate of Obligation for airport
improvements and all matters incident thereto,
L. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Chapter 10 of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Denton, Texas, to provide for the adoption of
the Uniform Fire Code, 1985 Edition; providing
Gity of Denton City Council Agenda
Decewber J, 1986
Page Four
for amendments thereto; repealing certain
provisions of Article III of said chapter
relating to the powers and duties of the Hire
Marshal; repealing the provisions of Article IV
of said chapter relating to liquified petroleum
gas; adopting a new Article IV entitled "Alarm
Systems", to provide for the installation of
smoke detectors in certain dwelling units;
repealing Article IV ("Burning of Trash and
Rubbish Restricted") of Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances; and providing for a penalty in the
maximum amount of $I,000.UU for violations
thereof.
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the number of persons authorized to be employed
in each classified position in the Police
Department for the City of Denton, Texas; and
repealing all ordinances and resolutions in
conflict herewith.
G. Lonsider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the office. (0) and
commercial (C) districts to the planned
development (PD) classification and approval of a
detailed site plan on a 20.550 acre tract located
on the south side of Audra Lane approximately 300
feet west of Loop 288. (Z-1813)
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning an
unused portion of Mills Road and Price Ito ad
located east of Trinity Roa,' and being part of
the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning a
:drainage easement between Lots 16 and 17, Block
E, Northwood Estates Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
vacating certain utility easements located within
Lot 19 block 40 Southridge bast. (The Public
Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval.)
K. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
vacating certain utility easelo?ts located next
to the Paige electric substation, (The Public
Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval.)
City oi` Denton City Council Agenda
December 9, 1986
Page Five
L. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
vacating certain utility easements located within
the Gazebo Apartment complex. (The Public
Utilities Hoard and Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval.)
51 Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution affirming
support by the City Council for the Services
Program for Aging Needs (SPAN) application to the
United States Department of Highways and Public
'T'ransportation for assistance for Handi-Hop.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City of Denton to apply to the 'texas Rental
Rehabilitation Program Fund for federal funds for
rehabilitation of privately owned rental property.
C. Consider approval of a resolution approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and the
Denton Independent School District regarding the
use of common polling places for elections.
6. Consider appointments to the Flow Regional Medical
Center Board of Advisors.
7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
8. Consider appointments to the slow Memorial Hospital
Board of Directors.
9. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest i±ems for future agendas.
10. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel and/or Board Appointments
11. Discussion of status of transfer/lease of Flow
Memorial Hospital.
12, Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.C.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252 17
V.A.C.S. (see item 011 above)
Personnel/Hoard Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 625 2 17 Y.A.C.. (see item #8 above)
C E R T I F I C A T H
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day, of 1986 at o'clock
(a.m.) (p.m.)
CITY SECKEFARY
24760
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ADDENDUM
December 9, 1986
1. Appearance by Mr. Louis Smith requesting City Council
endorsement for a celebrity golf tournament fund
raiser.
C h R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1986 at o'clock
(a.m.) p.m.
CITY SECRETARY
2476C/7
i
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT December 1, 1986
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Q
FROf1; LLOYD V, NARRELL, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT senior Citizen opportunities Committee
RECOMMENDAT ON;
N/A
SUf Y
This committee w4a established to review the needs of senior citizens
in our community.
BACK6 UN_D
A number of seniors from across the community were selected to participate
in a committee that would discuss and review opportunities for seniors.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GRQUU AFFECTED:
The City of Denton and all groups, agenc~ej, or individuals that serve
senior adults in our community.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
R1:SP FULL Sgj!
'~ITTED
LLOYD V► NARRELL .
CITY PANAGER
PRE ED BY;
NAME Steve Brinkman
TITLE Director, Parks and Recreation
OVEDS
TITLE
SENIOR CITIZENS OPPORTUNITIES COMMITTEE
November 21, 1986
Purposes To identify program interests and areas of needs of
Denton's older population.
Memberships
1) The Senior Opportunities Committee was organized at the
request of the City Council and was chaired by Mayor Ray
Stephens.
2) Committee members consisted in part of elected representatives
residing at Fairhaven, Good Samaritan Village, Heritage Oaks
Apartments, Lake Forrest, The Vintage, and elected
representatives from the Domino Club and Denton Senior Center
and other additional at-large members (see attachment A).
3) City of Denton support staff was provided through the services
of City Manager Lloyd Harrell and the following Parks and
Recreation staffs Steve Brinkman, directors Beth Stribling,
program coordinator; and Diana Perez, Senior Center supervisor.
Summary:
The Committee met on September 11, 25, and 30. Ident.ifi:ation of
specific areas of needs were made at all three meetings.
Transportation was prioritized as the number one need by the
Committee. Following is a list of needs and, when applicable, the
action taken at this times
1) Transportation
A. Evening/Weekend Transportations
Roberta Donsbach, executive director of Services Program
for Ageing Needs (SPAN, was invited to address the
Committee and reported that the cost of providing evening
and weekend transportation within the City of Denton
would cost over $460000 annually, that SPAN had received
funding cuts this year, and that without additional
funding it would be impossible to provide the services.
Jeff Meyer, director of City of Denton Planning and
Community Development, was contacted, and the
evening/weekend request has been referred to the Human
Resources Committee.
Page - 2
B. Public Transportation
2) Leisure/Educational Programs
A. Enlarge Senior Centers
Steve Brinkman reported to the Committee on the Capital
Improvement Program and the Senior Center expansion.
B. Senior Citizen Golf Tournaments
Denton Senior Center will sponsor a Senior Citizen Golf
Tournament on April 3 at the Sheraton Golf Course.
Complete information will be available in the 1987
Winter/Spring Parks and Recreation Brochure.
C. Seminar and Discussion Groups:
A list of 14 seminars/lectures compiled by Denton Senior
Center staff was presented to the Committee by Diana
Perez with an invitation to either attend these at the
Senior Center or to make arrangements with Center staff
for seminar to be presented at their own facility.
Topics ranged from "Brown Bag Prescription" to "New
Fishing Rules and Regulations" to "Denton's Black
History." A complete listing and scheduling will appear
in the 1987 Winter/Spring Parks and Recreation Brochure.
Joella Orr, director of Emily Fowler Library, presented
to the Committee information on speakers for book reviews
and discussed literature available for the visually
impaired.
3. Street/Traffic
A) Traffic light on University and Hinkle.
B) Drainage problem in front of Good Samaritan.
C) Peach Street needs to be swept and grass cut.
4) Accessibility
A) Wheelchair accessibility in downtown Courthouse Square
area.
5) Housing
A) Subsidized Housing for Seniors:
Page - 3
Marion Hamilton, director of Heritage Oaks Apartments,
represented Denton Housing Authority and informed the
Committee of critical need for low cost housing for older
people. Heritage Oaks Apartments currently has over 200
names on its waiting list.
6) Social Services
A) Hot Line/Support System for Elderly with Emotional/Mental
Problems
It was reported by Joan Floyd of Good Samaritan that the
Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) is in the
beginning stages of implementing a national program
called "Oasis" whose purpose is to provide mental health
counseling to older adults through the use of
volunteers. Initial target group is the older residents
residing in nursing homes.
7) Advocacy
A) Senior Citizen Advocacy
B) Financial Assistance for Silver-Haired Legislative
Representatives
Denton Senior Center Advisory Board has indicated
interest in this project and fundraising plans are under
consideration at this time.
8) Economic
A) Part-time Employment Referral Clearing House for senior
Citizens
B) Senior Citizen Craft Shops
A Senior Citizen Craft Shop is a long-term goal of the
Denton Parks and Recreation Department. Plans are in the
process to expand the Senior Center's Blue Ribbon Bazaar
and open it up to more older craftsmen. J
C) Seminars on financial assistance, consumer fraud, and j
insurances
Information is available on a Medgap Seminar in the 1987
Denton Parks and Recreation Department's Winter/Spring
Brochuro.
9) Nutrition
A) Status of Elderly Nutritional Needs in Dent
on
Page - 4
10) Future Projections
Mayor Ray Stephens indicated to the Committee that a possible
meeting would be held within the year. The Denton Parks and
Recreation Department is in the planning stages of organizing
a Denton Council of Senior Citizens with senior citizen
representation from Denton senior citizen organizations.
CITY OF DENTON
SENIOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Name Address Phone
Juanita Long 2905 Briercliff 387-6226
John L. Carter 1027 Ridgecrest Circle 382-9801
Mark Lockhart 1317 Linden Street (Domino Club) 387-1678
Lera McFarland 3901 Montecito #122 565-9099
Lake Forest Village
Wm. B. Henry, Jr. 3901 Montecito #610 387-0095
Lake Forest Village
Marian Hamilton 900 Sierra Drive 383-1506
Heritage Oaks
Obie O'Brien 2423 Emerson 382-4800
Virginia Foster 205 north Bonnie Brae 387-8482
The Vintage
A. L. Gilbrath 205 North Bonnie Brae 387-8482
The Vintage
Joan Floyd 2500 Hinkle 383-2651
Good Samaritan
Leona Ewing 2400 Bell 565-0908
Fairhaven
Wesley Jordan 2400 Bell 566-0198
Fairhaven
Ray Stephens 619 Ridgecrest 387-3340
Mayer, City of Denton
Lloyd Harrell 37 Timbergreen 382-4343
City Manager
Beth Stribling Parks and Recreation 566-0270
Diana Perez Parks and Recreation 566-8281
Otha Bingham 2501 Sell #225 387-3989
Heritage Oaks
Edith Bachman 2501 Bell #135 387-3166
Heritage Oaks
Johnnie Christian 2500 Hinkle 387-5426
Good Samaritan
JoAnn Newman 1320 Cromwell 387-4737
Ruth Mohair 528 Ruth Street 382-6893
Charlcie Barr Lake Forrest Good Samaritan
ggRr6 0 g&
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS Civic Center i 321 No McKinney i Denton, Texas 76901
CITY OF DENTON
SENIOR CITIZENS OPPORTUNITY COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1986
7:00 P.M. CIVIL DEFENSE RM.
A G E N D A
I. Introductions
II. Opening Rei,Arks/Purpose
III. Discuss Needs of Community
IV. Solicit New Ideas
V. Discussion of Future Meetings
VI. Other Business
VII. Adjourn
a 4 *0.4
Denton Parks and Rsor"don i Denton, Texas 1 (a 17) Off-#& TO
l l bl
0ENIOR CITIZM OPPORTUNITIES COMMITTEE MEETING
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1966
7sOO P.M. CIVIL DEFENSE ROOM
The first meeting of the Senior Citizen Opportunities Committee was
meld in the Civil Defense Room at 7pm on September 11. The meeting
was opened by Mayor Ray Stephens. City Manager Lloyd Harrell and 14
senior citizen representatives and/or staff attended the meeting.
The Denton Senior Center, SPAN, Vintage, Domino Club, and Denton
Newcomers' Club were named as positive things in the community.
The following areas of aging programs/services needs were identified:
1) Senior Citizen Golf Tournament
2) Enlargement of Senior Center
3) Protection against fraud as that which occurred at Lake
Forrest
4) Nighttime and weekend transportation for the elderly
5) More subsidized housing for the less affluent
6) Need for a hot line to help with emotional problems of the
elderly
7) Seminars and discussion groups (foods, styles, exercises,
insurance policies)
8) Public transportation
9) Senior Citizen advocates
10) Senior Citizen craft shop
Mayor Stephens requested that John Henry, Jr. and Leona Ewing
explain possibilities of beginning seminars, lectures, and
discussion groups at different senior citizen facilities.
Next meeting date was set for September 25 at Good Samaritan,
With no other discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
p~}
ONA
CU*;ULI
CI TY o! D&WOM, TtXAS Civic Contor ! 3219, McKinney ! Donton, Tomas 70201
CITY OF DENTON
SENIOR CITIZENS OPPORTUNITY COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1986
7t00 P.M. GOOD SAMARITAN
A G E N D A
I. Introductions
II. Restatement of Purpose of Committee
III. Continuation of Determination of Needs of Aging
Population in Denton
IV. Set Goals and Priorities
V. Initiate Work Toward Action Plans for Goals
and Priorities
VI. Future Meeting
VII. Other Business
VIII. Adjourn
• eJ1" e'y~ e./~Z~!?.t•LQti e.~~I~G "f►'~%17i1t~/~ .
Denton Parks and Recreation / Dentont Tomas ! (817) 600.8270
SENIOR CITIZENS OPPORTUNITIES COMMITTEE MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 1986
GOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE
The meeting opened with introductions of those present at the meeting.
Last meetings needs were discussed and emphasis was placed on trans-
portation being available during weekends and at night.
Steve Brinkman, Denton Parks and Recreation Director, reported on the
upcoming Bond issue and the status of the Capitol Improvements sub-
committee regarding the expansion of the Senior Center. Mayor Ray Stevens
encouraged committee members to voice opinions and provide input to
Mr. :3rinkman on any needs they would like considered in the expansion.
Committee members returned to their respective areas and brought to the
meeting the following additional needs:
* Transportation
* Peach Street ieeds to be swept and grass cut
* Concern that hospitals are dismissing people before they
should be dismissed
* Drainage problems in front of Good Samaritan
* Need for traffic light on University and Hinkle due to
heavy traffic
* Need for support for those suffering from emotional
problems (It was reported by Joan Floyd that RSVP is
coordinating a program to address this concern)
* Need for Seminars concerning Financial Assistance,
Insurance and Consumer Fraud.
* Need for more housing for elderly - there are waiting lists
at most facilities.
* Suggestion that a Golf Tournament for Seniors would be
successful
* The status of nutritional needs in the community
* Possibility of looking into a part-time employment
referral clearing house for Denton
It was also mentioned that Jim Riddlesperger, silver haired Legislature
Representative for Denton and Collin County, is having to pay his own
expenses for travel. Ideas for possible Fund Rasing were discussed.
Mayor Ray Stevens summed up the meeting by as%ing committee members to
set priorities on needs mentioned previously. The utmost priority was
the need for more transportation. Mayor Stevens will invite Roberta
Donsbach, Span Director, to attend the next meeting.
In order to provide additional programming for those facilities seeking
rlore activities, the Senior Center staff will provide committee members
with a list of seminar choices and then help coordinate these programs.
The next meeting will be held at Heritage Oaks Apartments, 2501 Bell Ave,
at 7:00 p.m.
Meeting was adjourned.
CITY OF DENTON
SENIOR CITIZENS OPPORTUNITY COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 1986
7:00 P.M., HERITAGE OAKS
AGENDA
I. Introduction
II. Literature for Visually Impaired - Joella Orr, Director,
City of Denton Public Library
III. Capital Improvement Project - Steve Brinkman, Director,
Parks and Recreation Department
IV. Transportation - Roberta Donsbach, Executive Director, Spann
V. Alternative Housing for Older People - Joe Gordon, Director,
Denton Housing Authority
VI. Workshop/Seminar information - Diana Perez, Center Supervisor,
Denton Senior Center
l
SENIOR CITIZENS OPPORTUNITIES COMMITTEE MEETING
OCTOBER 30, 1986
HERITAGE OAKS APARTMENTS
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ray Stevens.
The minutes were approved by the committee as written.
Mayor Stevens introduced the first speaker on the agenda, Joella Orr,
director of the Emily Fowler Library. Ms. Orr presented the various
literature available to the visually impaired through the public
library. Handouts regarding elgibility for the program were passed
out to committee members. Also, anyone interested in book reviews
were asked to contact the library for contact names.
Next on the agenda for the evening was Steve Brinkman, director of
Parks and Recreation Department. Mr, Brinkman presented an overview
of the Blue Ribbon Citizen's Committee five year capital improvement.
He highlighted the major areas of concern that would take place with-
in a five year plan. Major areas of concern were the streets and
drainage, athletic field developments, community recreation centers,
and the expansion of the Senior Center. The bond election has been
set for Saturday, December 13. Those interested in more detailed
explanation were asked to contact Mr. Brinkman, the City Manager or
the Mayor.
Mayor Ray Stevens informed the committee that a committee of citizens
would be appointed to monitor the program and report to the citizens
of Denton on an annual basis.
Mayor Ray Stevens then introduced Roberta Donsbach, executive director
of SPAN. Ms. Donsbach addressed the question of weekend and evening
transportation. She reported that originally SPAN offered weekend and
evening transportation, but there were not enough requests for this
service. Ms. Donsbach felt perhaps this was due to families being
around on the weekend. She also mentioned that for those requesting
transportation to church on Sundays the churches themselves often
arranged for transportation.
Ms. Donsbach also covered the funding of SPAN, the procedure for
purchasing new vans, and the possibility of opening up routes to the
public. She said it would cost over $46,000 annually to provide
evening and weekend transportation. She added that with the funding
cut they have received this year, it would be impossible to include
this in their program service without additional funding.
Joe Gordon, director of Denton Housing Authority was unable to attend;
Marion Hamilton represented the Housing Authority instead. Ms. Hamilton
mentioned that there was not enough low cost housing for older people.
Heritage Oaks Apartments currently has 200 names on its waiting list
and has never gotten below 150. Phoenix Apartments were also mentioned
as another possibility for housing. Ms. Hamilton stressed the importance
of shared housing for this area.
Senior Citizens Opportunities
Committee Meeting - Page 2
Diana Perez, Denton Senior Center supervisor, introduced Joann Newman
of The Day Home and Ruth Mohair, vice president of the Christian
Women's Organization. Ms. Newman gave a brief description of services
offered at The Day Home.
Ms. Perez then distributed handouts listing several workshops/seminars
scheduled to begin at the Senior Center in January. Anyone interested
in having one of these seminars offered at their facility was asked to
contact staff at the Senior Center.
Dude Hingham, committee member, expressed concerns over the inaccessi-
bility for wheel chairs on the square. Other locations presenting a
problem were brought up. Mayor Ray Stevens informed Ms. Bingham they
would look into that problem area.
Lera McFarland, committee member, invited everyone to attend the Lake
Forest Village Health Center Grand Opening, December 7, 2-5 p.m.
Mayor Ray Stevens then expressed his gatitude to everyone for their
time and interest. The Mayor mentioned that perhaps the committee
would meet again to touch base within a year or so.
Meeting was adjourned. Heritage Oaks then provided refreshments.
cs
Cff y of D!'Aff", rSXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i DENr0K rVAS 70201 TELEPHONE (W) "O-Mf
oHke of No city Maaaoa
M b M. O R A N D U M
TO: Lloyd laarrell, City Manager
FROM: Kick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
DATE: November 20, 1986
SUBJECT: Beautification Goals Update
After our discussions with the Council, we have gone back and
inserted several key points and items that they asked for. These
include some tiring changes on the urban design section in terms of
. direction from the Council. We also included a review of parking
requirements and tax advantages to be gained under the improvement of
the appearance of the City. If
We are continuing to cove forward on the impitmentation stages of
other are at the Council has approved,
c ve a
Assistant City Manager
ji ,
Goal: 9 CITY BEAUTIFICATION
Committee Members: Bill Angelo Julia Moore
Cecile Carson Steve Brinkman
Joella Orr Rick Svehla
Carol Short Debra Drayovitch
Chuck Carpenter Jeff Meyer
SUB-ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN
1. 'Code Enforcement -Establish training for new people Julia Moore Aug.-Sept., 1986
-Implement reorganization Bill Angelo Oct. 1, 1986
-Conduct evaluation of code enforcement Bill Angelo Oct. 159 1986
problem Rick Svehla
-Implement Action Plan Bill Angelo Nov. 19 1986
Rick Svehla
-Establish new goals and projections Julia Moore Nov. 15, 1986
for performance 1986-1987
-Present goals and projections to Julia Moore Dec. 9, 1986
Council
-Make tie-in to Denton Appraisal Dist. Julia Moore Jan. 1, 1987
and obtain access to their data
-Complete move of personnel to S.C. Julia Moore Jan. 1, 1987
-Keep statistics on court'acwtivity Julia Moore Ongoing
2. Park Dedication -Receive update from Parks Dept, and Steve Brinkman Oct. 28, 1986
Planning and Community Development on
status of proposed ordinance
-Staff meet with developers to discuss Steve Brinkman Nov. 1S, 1986
the material received describing Jeff Meyer
future park needs of the City and park Betty McKean
development fees
rage Two
-Hold Park Board meeting to receive a Steve Brinkman Nov. 249 1966
report from developers regarding
voluntary dedication of parks
-Developers submit their proposal Steve Brinkman Jan. 151987
to most the dedication needs' '
-Park Board reviews proposal and Steve Brinkman Jan. 26, 1987
decides how to proceed
-Report t.o a joint meeting of the Steve Brinkman Feb. 39 1987
Councii and P and Z and receive
recommendations on how to proceed y
-Consider ordinance process-minimum to Steve Brinkman Feb./March
consider development fee and/or mandatory
dedication if developers proposal is
unacceptable (Park Board, P and Z,
Council)
3. Urban -Conceptual discussions with Park Board Steve Brinkman Oct. 27, 1986
Design and methods to proceed
(tree planting
and replacement; -Staff develops preliminary standards Steve Brinkman Dec. 1 1986
landscaping; and discusses the problems Cecile Carson '
open space in a Jeff Meyer
development;
set-backs for -Review preliminary standards with Steve Brinkman Jan. 1, 1987
buildings, signs, developers Cecile Carson
sidewalks, etc.; '•s' Jeff Meyer
sidewalks
-Receive comments regarding the Steve Brinkman Feb. 10 1987
preliminary standards from
developers
-Hold a joint meeting of P and Z and Steve Brinkman 1st meeting in
Park Board and get staff direction Jeff Meyer March
-Hold a study session with Council Steve Brinkman st meeting in
for briefing on the direction the Jeff Mayer Aril
staff is moving.
i
Page Three
-Draft a proposed ordinance Debra Drayovitch April
-Continue ordinance process (Review Steve Brinkman April/May
by Parkh,,P and Z and Council) Jeff Meyer
4. Pro ram for -Consider reinstitution of Litter Bill Angelo April
citizen clean- Round-Up Day Steve Brinkman
up
Review and expand the beautification Steve Brinkman April
program
5. Establish -Designate all major thoroughfares Rick Svehla Nov. 1, 1986
volunteer within the City t
organizations
to promote the -Contact major organizations within the Chuck Carpenter Nov. 1S, 1986-
permanent City such as women's group, athletic Bill Angelo March 1, 1987
maintenance of associations, sororities and Steve Brinkman
major thoroughfares fraternities, Chamber of Commerce, Julia Moore
Adopt A Road Universities, churches, neighborhood Joella Orr
associations, etco to establish
volunteer programs
-Institute an "adopt a Street" program Bill Angelo March 1, 1987
using Chamber, Realtors, etc. for kick- Julia Moore
off
-Establish locations for each Bill Angelo Jan. It 1987
volunteer group and make appropriate Julia Moore
siggns designating areas'tp.,be Transp. Engineering
maintained by specific groUpb
Program for -Review efforts of the Beautification Steve Brinkman Nov. 15, 1986
improvement to Committee
appearance of the
City -Receive report on activities of the Cecile Carson Nov. 1S, 1986
realtors within the City Steve Brinkman
-Consider appointing a Blue Ribbon City Council Jan. 1, 1987
Committee to establish mechanisms for
improvement of the major entrances
to the City
Page Four
-Review existing ordinance for Cecile Carson Dec. 1, 1986
setback and spacing requirements Charlie Watkins
-CrW e a brochure on wall sign Cecile Carson Jan. it 1987
regulations, implement distribution Charlie Watkins
through permitting and CO process
-Review billboard standard9 Cecile Carson Dec. It 1986
Charlie Watkins
-Rov.tew portable si ns and Cecile Carson Jan. It 1987
requirements inclu~ing licensing Charlie Watkins
if mobile
-Review requirements for olitical Cecile Carson Jan. It. 1987
signs, consider establishing Charlie Watkins
timetable limits for set-up
and removal
-Provide proactive stance, Code Enforcement Ongoing
visit with candidate to explain Planning
rules and regulations as Jackie Doyle
candidates file
-Review parking requirements in Debra Drayovitch Jan. 1 1987
residential areas '
-Review and recommend ways~to offer tax Jeff Meyer Dec. 1, 1987
advantages to entities that Improve
the appearance of their prdperty.
7. Litter Control -Continue the "Street of the Week" Bill Angelo Ongoing
program in Solid Waste Charlie Watkins
Julia Moore
-Implement the 1986-87 budget proposals Bill Angelo Jan. 1 1987
for litter collection crew Charlie Watkins '
-Look at ways to maintain or expand the Steve Brinkman Jan. 1, 1987
litter barrel program on major
thoroughfares
Page Five
Implement a publicity program to Julia Moore March 1, 1987
positively enforce clean-up efforts and
ordinance enforcement.
-Construction clean-up requirements Bill Angelo Jan. 1, 1987
Debra Drayovitch
-Review existing litter ordinances to Bill Angelo Feb. 19 1987
allow for easier enforcement Debra Drayovitch
Julia Moore
Explore with the.Judge sentencing Rick Svehla Dec. It 1986
people for cleanup Debra Drayovitch
-Establish construction clean-up Bill Angelo Feb. It 1987
ordinance and requirements tnclWing Debra Drayovitch
requirements for waste containers Julia Moore
-Provide training and emphasis of the Rick Svehla Jan. 1, 1987
goal to police department to encourage
enforcement
8. Mowing -Review existing reporting and Steve Brinkman Dec. 150 1986
scheduling procedures Rick Svehla
-Set new goals and projections Steve Brinkman Feb. 11 1987
Rick Svehla
-Present new projections en~,goals to Steve Brinkman Feb. 39 1987
the Council Goals Meeting
11-19-86
3122M
Goal: 12 USER FEES
Team Members: Bob Nelson, Team Leader Gary Matheson
Jay Anderson Paul Reed
Steve Fanning Paul Leslie
Joella Orr Jerry Clark
David Ham Srini Sundaramoorthy
Glenn Jaspers Bill Angelo
SUB-Is6ub WHAT BY WHOM WHEN STATUS
A. What services are * Develop a list of services for All members 12-08-86
provided? which there are currently no
user specific charges.
* Develop a list of existing user fees All members 12-08-86
and revenue supported services
H. What existing or * Provide copies of Griffith's Fees Jay Anderson 11-25-86
new servi.%-es could For Services: A Cost/Revenue Stud
be fur►ded by user ummary 9-
£ees?
* Develop list of possible changes or All members .Jan-87
or new user fees not covered by
Griffith's Study
(Privatization) * initiate an update of the Griffith's Jay Anderson Apr-87
Study, and determine which fee
analysis to be used in second
Griffith's Study
* Determine which fee analysis to be Executive .Apr 87
used in second Griffith's Study Committee
* Conduct study o~ water and wastewater David Ham Mar-87
capital recovery fee issue
* Develop Police/Fire Alarm Permit Gary Matheson Feb-87
ordinance
Page `l oft
r
Goal: 12 USER FEES
SUB-ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN STATUS
C. What services * Review complete list of services Department Feb 87
should we no and list possible modifications or Director;
longer provide? elimination and consequences Executive
Committee
Council
D. What is the * Contact other cities and selected All members Mar 87
experience of departments for exampples of user
other cities fees. Check with COU.
regarding user
fees'? * Review suggested user fees with All members Mar 87
personnel in other cities and
report feedback received.
E. What impact would * Develop criteria for assessing impact All members Mar 87
user fees have on
current life * Analyze each proposed fee for impact All members Mar 87
styles and various
population groups?
F. What impact would * Analyze financial impact of: proposed All members Mar 87
user tees have on fees
budget and future
bond issues?
G. What are the legal * Review and address legal issues Legal Dept. Apr 87
constraints associated with proposed user fees
H. How do we implement * Develop strategy and action plans All members Apr 87
any proposed new for implementing proposed new user
user fees? fees. (i.e., selling the concept)
0 254n
Goal: J5 Improve city image
Committee Members: Mark McDaniel Annette Watkins
Michele Henchy Ralph Klinke
Jeanette Scott Bob Tickner
Hope Guajardo Charlotte Allen
Cnarlie Watkins Lloyd Harrell
SUB ISSUE WHAT i BY WHOM
A. HOW CAN WE MOTIVATE ALL OF OUR EMPLOYEES To ACCEPT A PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR BEING FRIENDLY0
COURTEOUS AND HELPFUL TO ALL CITIZENS?
1. Develop motto or Mission Statement Executive staff 3/87
and Publicize it
2. Assist Employees to Recognize - Promote wearing buttons City Image Task 4/87
Rolo with motto Force under CMO
- Posters
- Lapel pins
- Employees Newsletter
3. Awards Program for Employees - Identify exemplary employees City Imago Task 5/67
Force (wider CMO)
- Establish reward and recoy-
nition programs and
activitiest i.e.,
(a) fellow employees
nominate employee
of month or quarter
(b) promote wearing buttons
(c) publicize favoraklle
letters
(d) po4t items on bulletin
boards (how to demonstrate
our motto
SUB ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN
(e) motto on trucks
(f) employee recognition
program
(g) recognize employees who
demonstrate good image by
present of button, ribbon,
etc.
(h) citizens fill out cards on
helpful employees
(i) monetary prize along with
recognition
drawing at end of year for
trip
(k) recognition by annual awards
banquet
(1) recognition by city council
(m) recognition at Boards/Com-
mission banquet
4. orientation/Training Programs - Establish an organizational CMO/Executive Committee
environment which indicates
citizens relation training is
important and serious business
- Establish guidelines for CMO/Operation Analysis
dealing with citizens
- Consider developing an Tom Klinck Budget
audio-visual orientation discussion
program on dealing with 1987-1988
citizen relations
- New employee orientation Tom Klinck
program to reflect citizen
relations training
SUB ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN
- Continue Customer Service/ Tom Klinck
citizen relation training
program
- Training session on public Tom Klinck
contact
- Orientation for division Division Heads
- Toward excellence training Exec Committee 2/87 to 7/87
program
5. inclusion of Accountability on - Review to see if on Personnel/ 3/87
Employee's Performance performance review forms Departments/
Evaluation Divisions
B. HOW CAN WE AS AN ORGANIZATION INSURE THAT CITIZEN CONCERNS ARE PROKPTLY AND EFFECTIVELY ADDRESSED?
Is Better Identify and improve - Create and distribute internal Michele Henchy In-place
Identification of Functional, phone list/ready reference by Bryan Stuart (Final Stages)
Areas function to all employees 2/1/87
Revise telephone book (GTE) Michele Henchy 2/l/P7
listing/# reference Gary Collins
Evaluate need to rename Bill Angelo 2/1/87
functional areas and develop Ann Bingman
implementation schedule if
necessary
Proposals for external Bob Tickner 3/1/87
facility signage Charlie Watkins
Bruce Hennington
i
SUB ISSUE WHAT r By WHOM_~`r-~ WHEN
- Proposals for indoor Bruce Hennington 3/1/87
facility signage Charlotte Alien
Michele Henchy
Denise Spivey
Mark McDaniel
Dave Ham
Bill Angelo
2. Revise Policies Where Necessary - integrate Goal M2 as a mom Klinck 3/1/87
performance criteria on
all performance reviews
- Develops policies for handling operations Analysis 4/1/87
citizen/customer requests and
complaints
3. DeveL,7p Internal System To - Job-Line (Determine Tom Klinck 2/1/87
Effective Track Citizens Concerns feasibility/desirability)
- Hot-Line program, ombudsman Operations Analysis 4/1/87
and/or in-house telephone
referral program (Evaluate
feasibility and desirability)
4, Receiving Feedback on Performance/ - "Let's Hear About it" (CMO) Michele Henchy in-place
Institution of Follow-up on Request
- Feedback tool for divisions - Michele Henchy 3/1/87
City-Wide (Determine Mark McDaniel
desirability/feasibility) Charlie Watkins
Develop respective feedback
instrument if necessary
- Bi-Annual Citizen Survey Bryan Stuart in-place
5. Eduoate Employees About Other - implement stronger program for Tom Klinck 1/1/87
Functions/Operations Within the training about functions of
City other departments (orientation)
SUB ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN
- Implement division tour program Tom Klinck 3/1/87
- Participative orientation Tom Klinck 3/1/87
among related department/
division
- implement re-orientation Tom Klinr.k 6/1/87
program for senior employees
C. HOW CAN WE INSURE EMPLOYEES ARE SENSITIVE TO CITIZEN'S PERCEPTIONS?
1. Feedback to Employees - Feedback to all personnel Personnel 1/1/87
(a) Form designed to recognize (Hope Guajardo)
excellent work
(b) Send a memo announcing 2/1/87
program to Distribution
Gist 11 II, and III
(c) Prepare memos and forms CMO 2/l/87
as excellent work occurs
- Feedback of citizen's surveys CMO January
related personnel via newsletter Newsletter
2. Orientation and Training - Counseling/professional. Personnel As needed
Progr.ims development sessions
(films/speakers)
- Training sessions Personnel on-going
- Supervisory training Personnel On-going
- Educate work crews Direct Supervisors On-going
- Orientation sessions and Direct Supervisors on-going
department sessions
- Interviews (employment) Personnel on-going
SUB ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN
D. NOW CAN WE BETTER EDUCATE TOR CITIZEN ABOUT THE WAY SERVICRS ARE PERPORKRD BY OUR EMPLOYEES?
1. inform Public About - Consider producing a Steve Brinkman Budget Process
City Serv,lces citizen newsletter or Administration/ 1987-88 Budget
magazine council
- Newspaper Column - weekly City Council/ on-going
Administration
Bryan Stuart,
Coordinator
- Employee of the Month in Committee develop- To be
the Record chronicle ing an award program determined
for employees by committee
- Ad in newspaper Everyone placing Following
incorporating City motto a City ad adoption of a
motto
- Determine possibility of CMO 1/1/87
having a regular City
program on Channel 25
- Place motto on all City Vehicle Maintenance Following
trucks/City Stationery Purchasing adoption of
official
motto
- Investigate institution of a operations Analysis 5/1/87
volunteer program
- Encourage management Administration/ Budget Process
visibility in community city council 1987-88
by pa " nq civic club
memberanips
- Annual performance report Finance Department 3/1/87
- one sheet data on basic city Betty McKean 2/1/87
information (developed monthly)
1 SUB ISSUE WHAT BY WHOM WHEN
2. Tours and Exhibits - Open house tours Appropriate Upon the
of City Hall and departments opening of
city Facilities any new
facility
- City Government week with All City depart- Friday p.m.
exhibits and tours ments and agencies and Saturday
a.m, on date
to be deter-
minded by CMO
3. Speaker's Bureau - Compile list of City Hope Guajardo 1/1/87
speakers and topics Becky Beeler
- Announce availability of Hope Guajardo 2/1/87
speakers and topics to a,ll Becky Beeler
service clubs
4. Coffee with Mayor - Organize evening coffees Mayor and manager 1/29, 4/29,
and Manager at neighborhood centers 10/29
5. Institute Mayor-For-A-Day Program - Work with school district and Lloyd Harrell Spring 1987
institute program Mark McDaniel
6. Develop Slide Show About Basic - Study possibility of producing Administration/ Budget Process
city operations council 1987-88
1685s
-.:.v s~~.rrr.. r -s ._.c. R w5 ;iSMiE"3 t
: r
CITY of DENTON, MMS aiwoo Canter / on i AL mwkwoy / Tiip 7el4 t
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Betty McKean, Asr+-i ant City Manager
FROM: Steve Brinkman, Director, Parks and Recreation
DATE: December 3, 1986
SUBJECT: Data Processing/Personnel Agreement
The existing rata Processing/Personnel lease agreement between Joan
Cohagen and the City will expire December 31, 1986. As you know, we
have reached 4 new six year agreement with Ms. Cohagen. This
agreement is different than the pout agreement in that we pay one
set monthly fee, no tax increase/adjustment, and no ii,surance
increase/adjustment. The lease allows 0s. Cohagen a six percent
(61) cost of living increase the first year and a 5.5 percent annual
increase thereafter for the term of the contract. These increases
are in line with the price index stated in the Statistical Abstract
of the United States 1986 Edition.
We also have done a comparison of other rental spaces and have
determined that this new agreement is fair and even lower (cost per
square foot) than many surrounding lease buildings.
LEASE COMPARISON DATA
AS OF AUGUST, 1986
(61465 sq.ft.)
Office Area MonthW Rate/Rate Per Sg.Ft. Annual Rate
Data Processing/
Personnel Lease Space 51430.65/0.84 65,167.20
U. S. Post Office
101 E. McKinney 5,365.9S/0.83 $64,391.40
t4a"4Wsa4'VvatAwAdoA*a4d Winn"
r
z... a
1 h~ ems.,, r i r ;n: r
5
Off i,ge Area Monthly Rate/Rate Per 8 .Pt. Annual RaLt
Bell place
$00 Bell 8,081.25/1.25 $96,975.00
The McKinney Building
522 McKinney 71046.85/1.09 $84,562.20
Victoria Square
North Locust Street 60982.20/1.08 $83,786.40
Clear Creek
North Elm 51883.15/0.91 $70,597.80
Commerce Center
w. university Drive 6,465.00/1.00 $77,580.00
North Elm Center
North Elm Street 91115.65/1.41 $109,387.80
Average per sg.ft. $1.08
The lease comparison data (August, 1986 rates) does show that our
new agreement of $.89 per square foot the first rental year (1987),
$.94 per square foot the second year (1988), $.99 per square foot
the third year (1989), $1.04 per square foot the fourth year (1990),
and $1.10 per square foot the fifth year (1991) are figures less or
equml to the community average (August, 1986) lease rates. Only in
the sixth year (1992) does the square foot rate climb above the 1986
average rate. The 1992 square foot rate will be $1.16.
This new agreement allows us to rent 6,465 square feet of lease
space in the 199019 at today's average rentI rate for this area.
This is not as cost effective as building but probably the best
lease rate we can secure in Denton at the prear,t time.
Steve Brinkman
MEMO0803
r 1~: l,1 j.~{e
City Council Minutas
August S, 1986
The Council convened into the Work Session August S, 186 at 5:30
p.m. in the Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tom Alford; Council
Members Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and
Riddlesperger
City Manager and City Attorney
ABSENT: None
11 The Council received a report and discuss the status of the
lease agreement and litigation between the City of Denton and
Maverick Aircraft, Inc.
This item was taken under the Executive Session.
2. The Council reviewed and continued the seiection process
for the municipal Judge.
1'liis item was taken under the Executive Session.
31 The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters and personnel/board appointments. No official action
was taker..
The Council then convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m, in
the Council Chambers of the Muntctpal Hut lding at which the
following Items will be considercd:
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tom Alford; Council
Members Alexander, Chew, hopkins, McAdams and
Riddlesperger
City Manager, City Attorney'and City Secretary
ABSENT: None
The Council moved agenda item Y2 ahead in the order.
2. The Council r.,)nsidered approval of a resolution in
appreciation of the Denson Record-Chronicle for their support and
promotion of the Crepe Myrtle planting in conjunction with the
Carroll Boulevard Beautification Project.
Mr. Fred Patterson of the Denton Record- Chrontcle was present to
receive the resolution.
The following resolution was read by Mayor Stephens:
=r
t1~ ,S :i,; any 'nj'k4 i,• `:i J is!: .yi • r:. v;:
I
City of l,enton City Council Hinutex
Meeting of August so 1986
Page Two
RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION OF THE
"DENTON RECORD CHRONICLE"
WHEREAS, the Denton Record-Chronicle -
provided support and
promotion of the Carroll Boulevard Beautification
Project, Crepe Myrtle planting; and
WHEREAS, the Project solicited contributions from businesses
and private citizens to purchase Crepe Myrtle Trees to
complete the beautification project started in 1979;
WHEREAS, The Project, Co-sponsored by the City Beautification
Committee, Chamber of Commerce and the Denton Record-
Chronicle, received donations which totaled $5,977.43
and nighty Crepe Myrtle trees were planted between
Fort Worth Drive and Sherman Drive;
NOW9 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
that the Council of the City of Denton, texas, actin
on behalf of the citizens and staff of the City of
Denton, wish to acknowledge, with grateful
. appreciation, the support and promotion provided by
the Denton Record-Chronicle which has made the Carroll
Boulevard Beautification Project a success.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the Sth day of August, 1986,
CITY GF DENTON
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLhNp CITY SECRETART
CITY OF DbNTUN, TEXAS
A PPRUVhD AS '10 LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A i RA U , CITY ATTOMY
CITY OF UNTON, TE)LKS
Alford motion, Riddlesperger second that the resolution he
approved. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,"
Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye," Chew Faye," and
Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanilmously,
t~ t •N uQ,t kf 4'r ~r i'.' _e4Y st L..,
v ag ,.n ,'^.2•..a^^arfr~+~~ '7x nx%w ,y~r'. .}.r, +rz~ .ice ,a,r _
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August S, 1986
Page Three
The Council moved agenda item 13 ahead in the order.
31 The Council held presentation of awards for benuti£ication
effort to the City to Mrs. Mildred Hodges in the residential
category and Mr. Jack Bell for Victoria Square in the commercial
category.
The Mayor presented the awards which were accepted by Mr. Monte
Mason of Jack Schmidt and Sons Funeral Home in the commercial
category (a previous winner) and Mr. Jack Bell of Victoria Square in
the commercial category. Mrs. Mildred Hodges was not present to
receive the residential category award.
The Council then returned to the regular agenda order.
11 The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of June 10.
Alexander motion, McAdams second to approve the Minutes as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Public H6arings
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
The Nelson Corporation, represented by Craig Curry, requesting a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned
development (PD) district and approval of a concept plan on a 52.9
acre tract to the Stephen Hembrie Survey, Abstract 643. The
proporty is located on the north side of Robinson Road approximately
800 feat west of state School
Road. If the planned development is
approved, the following land uses will be permitted:
Cluster Homes/Patio Howes - 9.S acres, S2 total units,
with a density of $.S unit6 per acre
Duplex - 13.4 acres, 80 total units,
with a density of 6 units per acre
Multi-Family (MF-1) - 10.7 acres, 193 total units,
with a density of 18 units per acre
Multi-Family (MF-1) - 8.0 acres, 144 total units,
with a density of 18 units per acre
General Retail (Gil) - 2.7 acres
General Retail (Gil) - 8.6 acres Z-17321
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Craig Curry, from the Nelson Corporation representing the
applicant, spoke to favor. His client was seeking approval of a S2
acre planned development. This petition was initially heard by the
Planning and Zoning Commission on March 26 where the proposal was
tabled for study of an intensity node. On April 9 the Planning and
Zoning Commission held a workshop on a changa in the intensity a.nd
on April` 43 a change to a moderate intensity node was approved. Mr.
Curry',,t'hen displayed various exhibits including an aerial on the
~ ''h=.. Yp #r r i. ii Y. E t L,fk!'r~ r
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Pour
entire Oakmont community, located on Loop 288. Mr. Curry pointed
out the proposed locations for arterial !,treats and various types. of
housing units on a conceptual site plan, kips of current and
proposed zoning were also discussed. Mr. Curry concluded by stating
that he felt the land uses were appropriate for the area as well as
the road system.
Mr. Mitchell Turner, 2118 Stonegate, spoke in opposition stating
that he was speaking on behalf of the people in southeast Denton,
he was a member of the Land Use Committee and had been shocked. At
the present time the City was divided Cato 5 areas each with
approximately 20% of the population. In 2S years 3S1 to 35% of the
population would be in the southeastern part of town which would
overload every major road. This did not have to happen if the City
Council would roverse current zoning trends. This trend had been
during recent time; since 1984. Tho petition being discussed w1s
originally recommended b the Planning and Zoning Commission as a 30
acre moderate zone and now was S2 acres. It could have an adverse
impact on the area as it was too diverse and was not a compatible
land use. The proposal would not spread the density all -rel the
City and was - too much multi-family. Growth needed to be
controlled. 'This petition slid not meet the criteria for medium
density and would only benefit the developer.
Council Member Chew asked Mr. 't'urner if he was speaking as a member
of the Land Use Committee or as an individual.
Turner,responded that he was spe3king as an individual.
Mr. George Olufsen, 2901 Santa Monica, spoke in opposition stating
that Oakmont lI would have multi-family housing next to existing
single family housing with no transition. Denton did not need any
more apartments. If the election was any indication, the citizens
did not want more apartments.
The Mayor closed the public ;gearing,
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that this petition had been
before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council in
the form of a change to the inten;:ity node. An update to the Denton
Development Guide had adder' two m,)derate intensity nodes which was
approved via resotutiop by the Ciry Council in May. The proposal
did present problems as it was split between the City of Denton and
the City of Corinth. The main concerns during planning were the
location near Texas Power and Light easements and lack of buffer
zones (multi-f.amtly and retail next to single family) as well as the
alignment of Loop 288. Staff was concerned rega,•ding right-of-way
for the proposed extenbion of the loop; however, if the loop was not
extended in this area, the reguireAient for 50 feet jet backs could
be eliminated from the planned dev,.*t opment ordinance. Regarding off
site improvements, State School. Road was in poor repair. The
Council could recommend- improvrixents to State School Road from
h
tl) r J Y r 1 i J v " ^t L 1 .$ie u._ r.». ~ t~•. .1,~_ . ~7G".r ~e~. r ~h .,y ~ flaw IY « r. tr. .:J~\~.
! \
i2 ~~7 i'F r'- . ,S •gfrt .i ""f :F ~'w(^~2>'w:v `7"ri
3
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
rage Five
Ike-358 to the northern boundary of the property. There were 8 reply
forms mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 returned in opposition.
The Mayor allowed S minutes for rebuttal.
Mr. Craig Curry, representing the petitioner, rebutted stating that
opposition had not been previously heard at the Planning and Zoning
Commission meetings. Thtm was one case where Oakmont had shown the
City Council that they were trustworthy and would stand by their
word. All street improvements have been done at the expense of
Myers Development. It was a unique piece of land and densities, on
the whole, were not high. Adjacent area was currently toned for
duplex and fourplex development. There was some concern about the
condition requiring 201 of the area be landscaped.
Carson responded that the percentage of area for landscaping in the
ordinance was consistent with current requirements but could be
reviewed during the next step of development.
i. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in tontng and approval of a concept plan on a
52.9 acre tract located on the north side of Robinson Road
approximately 800 feet west of State School Road.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 66-143
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. .
69-19 AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 52.9 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDS OF ROBINSON ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST OF STATE SCHOOL ROAD, AS IS
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR, A CHANGE
IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING
FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FUR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $100')4.00 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, mcAdams second to adopt the ordinance with the Planning
and Zoning Commission recommendations, On roll call vote, McAdams
"aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye", Rtddiesperger
"aye,;' Chew "ayeand Mayor Stephens "aye,„" !lotion carried
unanimously.
B. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Paul M. Haywood, Jr. requesting amendment of a detailed site plan on
a 2.1 acre general retail section of an existing planned development
(PD-4I) located at the southwest corner of East McKinney Street (Flt
i SJ' 1 ~ t 3 .1 Sa Y "S r ar)ra t{„y, r it4 ;~'3 s S~ f Fri .~~~5 SS r) ~ aZtl[''^=~'TiVq
RW17W411rY3A rig,
City of Benton City Council Minutes
Meetin of August S. 1986
Page Six
426) and Loop 288. The property is further described as a tract in
the M. Yoachum S+irve , Abstract 1442, if approved, the amendient
will Chan a the design of a proposed curb cut/driveway on Loop
2880 Z-1$90
The mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Tom Jester, representing Paul Haywood, spoke in favor stating
that one traffic median at the location was not acceptable to the
state. His client did not really care one way or the other,
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that 4 reply forms had been
mailed with O returned. This was a Z acre tract on the southwest
corner of Loop 288 and East McKinne/ Street. Zoning had bath
approved for retail use, A detailed site plan had been approved kby
the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. One
feature included was a curb cut on Loop 288 which did not meet the
subdivision rules and regulations for corner clearance distance.
This request forwarded to the State Highway Department and was
rejected. The w3w design reflected a "driveway" effect which the
City Engineer felt would create a hazardous condition.
Council Member Alexander asked for alternatives.
Spivey responded that the design which the developer had agreed upon
had been rejected by the state; however, the design before the
Council was the one which the state had suggested.
Jerry Clark, City Engineer, stated that the turning ratio for the
first proposal violatei state standards. The curb cut could either
be removed or used as a standard driveway,
Council Member McAdams asked if the location of Vat curb cut could
be moved or must it be eliminated.
Clark replied that spacing on a major arterial should be 200 feet.
Council Member Hopkins asked if there was a curb cut to the property
on McKinney Street,
Clark responded yes.
Mayor Stephens asked it the curb cut on McKinney and Loop 288 corsld
be consolidated.
Clark responded that the maximum width wanted would be 35 feet.
Mr. Jester stared' that they had been wbrkin on this project over a
year. They had been to Planning and Zoning Commission, City
Yar~tl s~
E~
~uY4.~i1i~iY.fdl7t u~~t41d.
rr :fix
47
IL
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Seven
councfi, Development Review Committee and Citizens Traffic Safety
Support Coaaission. They would strongly request council not to
el minate the curb cut as it would have a very detrimental effect on
the center to not have access from Loop 288.
Council Member McAdams stated that she felt people would turn both
ways at this access point.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving amendment of a detailed site plan on a 2.1 acre general
retail section of an existing planned development (PD-41) located at
the southwest corner of East McKinney Street (FM 426) and Loop 288.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-144
AN ORDINANCE ANENDING ORDINANCh N0. 86-91 TO PROVIDE FOR
APPROVAL OF A REVISED DETAILED PLAN FOR A PORTION OF THE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO.
82-83, AS SAID PLAN APPLIES TO 2.1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAST MCKINNEY STREET AND HIGHWAY
LOOP 288; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF
$10UOO.UO FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
kFFECTIVE DATh.
Alexander coition, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "nay," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye",
kiddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "nay". Motion
carried 5 to 2 with Council McAdams and Mayor Stephens casting the
"nay" votes.
C. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Jo Storer requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the
planned development (PD) district and approval of a concept plan on
164.31 acres located at the southeast corner of Brush Creek Road and
U.S. highway 377. The property is more fully described in the H.
Haggood Survey, Abstract S17; W. Hudson Survey, Abstract 586; and
George Iv. Laughtery Survey, Abstract 3Si. If approved, the planned
development will permit the following land uses:
General Retail - 17.28 acres
Private School - 2.36 acres
Single Family Attached - 10.48 acres, 117 total units,
with a density of 11.2 units per acre
Multi-Family - 11.21 acres, 200 total units,
with a density of 17.8 units per acre
Single Family Attached - 18.82 acres, 218 total units,
with a density of 11.60 units per acre
Single Family (SF-10) - 35.60 acres, 102 total units,
with a density of 2.87 units per acre
Single Family (SF-16) - 60.76 acres, 122 total units,
with a density of 1.01 units per acre
f Open space (private) - 7.80 acres Z•1791
gg < t ;
p`
'i Et r v k# ^~rr a *
City of Denton'Ctty Council Minutes
Meetin of Aurist 5, 1986
Page h ght
The Mayor openod the public hearing.
Mr. Greg Edwards, Metroplex Engineering representing Ms. Storer,
spoke in favor stating that the parcel was located southeast of two
arterials. There was a rai:road track on the west of Highway 377
and east was the Denton Country Club golf course. His firm had
tried to follow the Denton Development Guide regarding buffering
higher intensity and less desirable land uses on the west side.
There was a creek on the northern portion of the property which
would provide permanent buffering . The required right-of-way would
be provided for the proposed Loop 288 extension should it come down
Brush Creek Road.
Ms, Jo Storer, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that the
development would be very open and hoped the Council could grant
approval.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that this was a planned
development of approximately 164 acres in st:,e and was located a
considerable distance from any developed area of Denton, The
petition was for a planned development aad was in a moderate
intensity area, No additional set backs had been requested along
Brush Creek Road. The Argyle/Denton issue regarding utilities had
been addressed and the petition did not violate the Denton
Development Guide. There had been 5 reply formes mailed with 0
returned.
11 The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change to zoning and approval of a concept plan on
164.31 acres located at the southeast corner of Brush Creek Road and
U.S. Highway 397.
The following ordinance was presented;
NO, 86-145
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
UkDiNANCba OF THh CI'T'Y OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 164.31 ACRES
OF LAND LUCAThD AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BRUSH CREEK ROAD
AND U. S. HIGHWAY 779 AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HbRBIN; To PROVIDE FOR A I.HANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AGRICULTURAL "A14 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
14SIGNATION, To PLA14NED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL
OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOK SAID DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 000, 00 FOR VIOLATIONS
THERhOt; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFPBC IVg DATE.
LL"
r~ ,•r a, ,e:;' ` a W,-
7Y17
F
City of Lenton laity Council Minutes
Netting of August S, 046
Page Nine
McAdams notion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins 'lave," Alford
kiddlesperger "aye," Chew "ayes" and Mayor Stepher's "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
D. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Metroplex Engineering Corporation requesting a change in zoning from
the office (0) and commercial (C) distracts to the planned
development (PD) classification and approval of a detailed site plan
on a 20.550 acre tract located on the south side of Audr.t Lane
approximately 301 Feet west of Loop 288. The property is further
described as a tract in the M.E.P. and P. Railroad Company Survey,
Abstract 927. If approved, the, planned development and site plan
will permit the development of 472 multi-family units. Z-1813
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Greg Edwards, Retronlex Engineering representing the owners,
spoke in favor stating that this was a portion of an existing
planned development. The developers were interested in 11 acres of
multi-family. The current planned development was for multi-family
and the petitioners were requesting a detailed site plan for this
0 area. There was a problem with encroachment on office and
commercially zoned area. Il,e request was for 20 acres of
multi-family with parking and landscaping. The request was actually
for down zoning and would lessen the intensity.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Urban planner, reported that 6, reply forms had been
mailed with 1 returned in favor and r; returned in opposition. In
May of 1980, three zoning changes had been approved by the City
Council; commercial zoning on 12.3 acres, office zoning on 2.9 acres
and a multi-family planned development on 11.1 acres. The
developers were planning to develop a portion of the commercial and
office as multi-family, which they could do under cumulative
zoningo kavher, they had asked to add this multi-family to the
planned development and site plan. The tract was located in a low
intensity area by current zoning but also was under standard in
actual land use. The only concern was the concentration of the
units which would be a violation; however, a planned development
with a site plan was preferable . All isrues had been reviewed and
were in compliance. The Planning and Zoning Commission had
recommended approval.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to approve the petition. Motion
carried unanimously.
44
ju~
y
City of Menton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August S, 1986
Page Ten
B. The Council held a continuation of the public hearirtg
on the petition of Dr. Bill Cudd requesting a change in zoning from
the single family (SF-10) district to the planned development (PD)
classification on an 18.24 acre tract located at the northeast
corner of U.S. Highway 380 and Old North Road. The property is
further described as a tract in the Caswell Carter Survey, Abstract
275, and the R. B. Longbottom Survey, Abstract 775. If the planned
development is approved, it will permit the development of an office
p. Z-184,
The mayor opened the public hearing.
Mayor Stephens asked staff to provide background information.
Denise Spivey, Urban Plenner, reported that there had been one
previous zoning case in 1984. The request was for a change from
single family to a planned development with 104 acres of
neighborhood services, a 2 acre park, 6.5 acres for warehouse use,
S.4 acres of cluster housing and 2.8 acres of zero lot line
housing. This request had been dented. There had been another
zoning request on property located to the west of this parcel.
. The Mayor continued the public hearing.
Dr. Cudd, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that his request
was basically for a 3,000 square foot office complex. He had been
with not hborhood representatives regarding the development and had
not race ved any negative input. Drainage would not be a problem at
MI.tywood and he did not want a large portion of multifamily
housing in the parcel. He would maintain a private roed open to the
public and was willing to put this commitment in writing. The
parcel would be developed in S phases with the drainage concerns
addressed first.
Council Member McAdams asked how and when the drainage problem would
be rosolved.
Cudd responded that the land would be professionally maintained and
contain concrete, sod and trees. A six foot fence would be
installed for buffering.
Council Member McAdams stated that there were a number of areas in
Denton with vacant offices. What was the guarantee that this
project would proceed if the first five acres of the offices did not
sell.
Cudd replied that he would be selling the majority of the buildings
rather than leasing and, in that regard, there was virtually no
competition on tae market.
Council Member McAdams stated that a third party could purchasethe
building %ad than lease space.
Y ~1) '?fa 4J ` P' .sly ' r•" ` ~f rhS7 I it ° `1 *+J Ji S~i i ~5 r : 3.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August S, 1986
Page kleven
Cudd responded that he would set a limit on the percentage of the
property which could be leased.
Council Member McAdams asked how this would be done.
Cudd replied through deed restrictions.
Council Member McAdams stated that the City could not enforce deed
restrictions.
Mr. Roger Barrett, Metroplex Engineering, spoke in favor and
presented a graphic layout of the proposed development. He further
stated that there was neighborhood support for the project. The
problem was buffering. No parking would be allowed on the road
going into the project for safety reasons, The landscaped 30 feet
of drainage easement would help the neighbors to the north and the
residential type architecture and landscaping would be compatible
with the neighborhood. It was planned to realign the existing
drainage channel to the property,
Mr. Greg Edwards, Metroplex Engineering, spoke in favor stating and
presented a slide of the existing subdivisions with single family
homes. Mistywood was locatea on the south side cf the property.
The City's master drainage plan called for water to drain on down to
the creek, In fact, the water drained into the bark yards on the
south side of Mistywood and then into the street and cul-de-sacs and
into the yards. There was a high point in the street and a 30 to 40
acre tract which drained into the bal-k yards, Development of this
parcel would pick up the drainage onto Dr. Cudd's property. These
drainage problems would be eliminated by this development, His firm
had taken a look at the entire area and the major drainsgge channel,
If the property was developed, it would add S acres of Elow to the
railroad track, The flow would be reduced upstream by So gfs.
Mr. Sam Rosson, 2516 Freedom Lane, spoke in favor stating that he
was a volunteer lead block captain to look after the best interests
in the neighborhood. He had come to the conclusion that the
property was not suitable for single family dwellings, Dr. Cudd was
willing to expend large sums of money to improve the drainage
situation on Mistywood and the architectural style would be
compatible. The schools in the area were already overcrowded and
both single family or multt-family housing would only add to that
problem. As the office units would be purchased rather than leased,
there would be some pride in ownership. Dr. Cudd was planning to
have his own office in the complex.
Mrs. Virginia Blair, Foxcroft Circle, spoke in favor stating that
the neighborhood block captains had been organised to protect the
neighborhood but were to favor of the petition. ,
Mr. Gene Atkin, 116 Old Mill Pond, spoke in favor stating that he
had contacted all 13 homeowners and 11 were in favor prior to the a
hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. J
City of Denton city council minutes
meeting of August S, 1986
Page Twelve
Mr. Charles Mayfield, 2491 Bast University, spoke in favor stating
that he would prefer a horse pasture but that would not happen. He
felt the intersection was a traffic hazard.
Ms. Barbara !toss, 2728 Mistywood, spoke in favor stating that they
neighbors had fought drainage problems. This petition was the best
which had been proposed. If the project took care of the drainage,
the neighbors would get the 20 feet easement back.
Ms. Lathy Ulatoskt, block captain, spoke in favor stating that she
had worked for two years regarding this property. The proposal was
not for commercial development but rather garden offices. Other
developers were watching to see what happened. The neighbors felt
this was what their neighborhood needed and would be the highest and
best use of the land.
Mr. 'fom Collins, Mtstywood, spoke in favor stating that he also wa,
a block captain and his interest was the drainage situation and the
20 feet easement. He hoped the Council would approve the plan.
Mr. Bob Gorton, 2414 Emerson, spoke in favor a presented a petition
signed by 22 residents. The block captains had worked with the
developer and the neighbors had been given the opportunity to voice
their opinions. He asked the City Council to consider all of the
issues.
Mr. Tony Lewis, representing the block between Old North Road and
woxcroft, stated that this block was also in favor of the petition.
Ms. Larlene Guthrie spoke in opposition stating that it took three
minutes to get across Old North Road now and it was a dangerous
intersection. This development would add to the traffic problem.
Mr. Mark Frost, 14i.ll Pond, spoke in opposition and presented a list
of those in opposition to the development. Those in opposition
wanted single family development.
The Mayor allowed l`r. Cudd five minutes for rebuttal.
Mr. Ron Hayes, representing Dr. Cudd, stated that his client had
begun with a small proposal on 2 acres which had been expanded to
the present 18 acres at the request of the neighborhood. Twenty
reply forms had been mailed with 15 returned in favor and none in
opposition. Seven block captains had spoken in favor of the
petition. The proposal was not commercial but rather garden
office. Dr. Cudd would dedicate a public street if the Council so
aestred. While the number of units was high, they would be
residential in appearance. Any violations' of density were the
outgrowth of trying to meet the needs of the neighbors.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Thirteen
Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, reported that this Particular zoning
case had generated much discussion. The parcel was located in a low
intensity area which was designated by the Denton Development Guide
as primarily residential. The traffic generation stady took into
account the entire area. While this development would generate more
traffic than single family uses, it did not violate the standard for
the entire area, Approval of this petition woul~ be a gross
violation of the Denton Development Guide, The neighbors would wo
able to reclaim the 20 feet easement and Dr. Cudd had met with the
neighborhood and incorporated their suggestions into the plan. Old
North Road and Highway 380 had been approved for a traffic signal.
Funds were in a futur,i Capital Improvements Program bond issue and,
if approved, would be included in the first year, The Planning and
Zoning Commission had recommended denial by a vote of 3 to 1, if
approved by the City Council, staff recommended the inclusion of all
suggested conditions to the planned development. It would require 6
affirmative votes to overturn the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommendation for genial, Dr. Cudd would maintain the private road
as the City had no enforcement power on private streets. The City
also could not enforce any deed restrictions with Dr. Cudu might
place on the structures.
Council Member McAdams stated that she felt the neighbors should
know that when Dr. Cudd sold the units, he waz no longer responsible.
Debra Drayovftch, Gity Attorney, reported that the City could not be
involved with deed restrictions; the primary concerti was land use.
Council Member Hopkins stated that she assumod an officeowner
association would play the same role as a homeowners association, in
which members were bound by vory strict rules.
Riddlesperger motion, Alexander second to approve.
Council Member McAdams stated that she felt this was something the
neighbors would regret. There would be ten times more traffic than
now existed. while she could sympathize with the people regarding
the drainage problem, she felt this development would impose on the
entire neighborhood.
Council Member Alexander stated he felt it was a dangerous precedent
not to listen to the neighbors and developer who had worked together.
On roll call vote, McAdams "nay," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,pp
Alford "aye," Kiddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens
playa.'' Motion carried b to 1 with Council blember McAdams casting
. the "nayp" vote.
F. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Mel. R. Lacquemont requesting a change in zoning from the
aggricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD)
classification and approval of a concept plan on a 412.12 acre tract
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Fourteen
in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract 1288. The property is located
on the west side of FM 2164 approximately 1,850 feet north of
Hercules Lane. If approved, the planned development will permit the
following land uses:
Tract I - Townhouses - 21.50 acres, 215 total units,
with a density of 10 units per acre
Townhouses, 14.71 acres, 147 total units,
with a density of 10 units per acre
Townhouses - 21.17 acres, 211 total units,
with a density of lU units per acre
Neighborhood Service - 2.77 acres
Tract, II - Single Family (zero lot line) - 33.64 acres,
168 total lots, with a density of 5 units per acre
Uffice - 19.01 acres
Tract III - General Retail - 20.74 acres
Multi-family - 30.94 acres, 618 total units,
with a density of 20 units per acre
Townhouses - 12.96 acres, 129 total units,
with a density of lU units per acre
Tract IV - Townhouses - 22.48 acres, 179 total units,
• with a density of 8 units per acre
General Retail - 7.88 acres
Tract V - Multi-Family - 18.26 acres, 292 total units,
with a density of 16 units per acre
Single Family (zero lot line) - 43.88 acres
219 total lots, with a density of 5 units per acre
Single Family (7,500 square foot lots) - 68.16 acres,
259 total lots, with a density of 3.8 units per
acre
Single Family (10,000 square foot lots) - 29.51
acres,
88 total lots, with a density of 3 units per acre
Neighborhood Service - 3.01 acres
Upen Space (detention) - 13.31 acres Z-181S
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Council Member Hopkins left the meeting due to a conflict of
interest.
Mr. Mel Lacquemont, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that he
was a planning and zoning consultant representing Sweeney
Thiebeaux. He commended the City staff for their work with him on
this case. The parcel was locate in north Denton and was 412 acres
divided into two sections being split by Loop 288. There was a
"noise corridor" due to the Loop and approximately 62 acres of the
land was unusuable. The Denton Development Guide called for the
area near Loop 288 and Locust Street to be moderate and low
intensity areas. The moderate intensity area would have to be
increased with retail and other transitions. Utilities in the area
would meet the requirements of the City. The water situation was
acceptable; however, sewer service was a Problem. The developer
i City of Benton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Fifteen
would have to install a parallel sewer line and extend such to the .
property. There was good thoroughfare access due to Loop 288,
Locust Street and Highway 77. The internal thoroughfares would be
collector streets. In trying to address the comments and concerns
expressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the multi-family
portion had been reduced to 200 units. His client also concurred
that there should be no through street and would reduce the
multi-family from 20 to 18 units per acre. The plan included 7.8
acres of retail use but this included the transmission line
easements. The 10 units per acre of townhouses was felt to be
excessive which only left two pieces of property which would have to
be developed at SF-10. The lower density could be transferred from
the property to two parcels. The development would be residential
in nature and of moderate intensity.
Mr. David Evers Tripp, representing the family, spoke in favor
stating that there had been some concern at first regarding the
development but the issues had been addressed.
Mr. Phil Phillips, attorney representing Sweeney Thiebeaux, spoke in
favor stating that he had contacted Mr. Dave Brown and he was
O satisfied with the plan. There were no objections to the plan by
the neighbors.
mr. Floyd Gaston, pastor of the North Elm Baptist Church, spoke in
favor stating that he felt this was a good plan for the area.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that this was a complicated
issue. The Planning and Zoning Commission had considered the
petition .end a split vote resulted. Therefore, the Commission had
no recommendation to forward to Council. The Item has presented to
the Council by the petitioner was not the same as seen by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff had rajviewed this plan.
Mayor Stephens asked if the petition should be referred back to the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, reported that while the changes
might be substantive, they appeared to be less dense; however, if
the petition as presented was different from the one which had been
advertised for the public hearing, a referral back to the Planning
and Zoning Commission might be in order.
Council Member McAdams stated that the overall density was
decreased. Perhaps it should be referred back to staff for review
rather than the Planning and Zoning Commission.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August S. 1986
Page Sixteen
Lacquemont stated that prior to submission to the Planning and .
Zoning Commission in June, staff had included a list of
recommendations. All of those items had been discussed at the
Planning and Zoning Commission and were resubmitted to staff. At
this point, they were talking about a conceptual site plan.
Council Member Alexander stated that the issue appeared to be with
the conditions of the plan and not major changes. While he would
prefer to see exacting wording, he did not feel the petition should
be referred back to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Council Member Chew stated that no ordinance was being considered at
this time • only the concept of the plan.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that he felt sympathy for the
petitioner and felt the staff would look more favorably on this plan
as given; however, this was a procedural question. It was not the
policy to make changes in a plan on the City Council floor. Staff
would prefer to review the plan and report back to the Council.
Debra Urayovitch, U ty Attorney, reported that this item could be
placed on the next City Council agenda and perhaps the ordinance
also be Included.
Council Member Alford stated that It was frustrating that a group
could prepare the plan, go before Planning and Zoning Commission
only to have the Council table the item.
Lacquemont stated that he did not disagree with the review as there
would be a time delay between the approval and the passage of the
ordinance in any case, However, his client would like to have a
consensus on approval from the Council so action on the property
could begin,
kiddlesperger motion, Chew second to approve the petition dependant
on the concurrence by staff.
Motion was withdrawn.
Alexander motion, McAdams second to Instruct staff to prepare an
ordinance for August 19 incorporating the changes as presented by
Mr, Lacquemont, with staff review and report to Council prior to the
passage of the ordinance, motion carried unanimously,
G, The Council held a public hearing concerning the
proposed annexation of approximately 132,64 acres of land being part
0 of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and part of the W.
Durham Survey, Abstract No. 3U09 and beginning at, a point
approximately one mile south of NM 426 (East McKinney) and l 1/2
miles north of I.3SE. A-37
3
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August S. 1986
Page Seventeen
Council Member Hopkins joined the meeting.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
David hllison, Senior Planner, spoke in favor stating that this was
the path of the proposed thoroughfare for the proposed Lakeview
development. One reply form had been mailed with zero returned.
There were no housing units or population in the parcel. The second
public hearing would be held on August 19.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing,
Chew motion, Riddlesperger second to continue with annexation
proceedings. Motion carried unanimously.
H. The Council held a public hearing on an ordinance
amending Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton,
Texas, by amending the provisions relating to participation and pro
rata reimbursement agreements for water and sewer facilities to
provide that such agreements shall terminate within one year thereof
unless construction of the facilities has begun.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, spoke in favor stating that the
City should not lock up funds for more than one year due to these
pro rata and participation agreements.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
11 The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton,
Texas, by amending the provisions relating to participation and pro
rata reimbursement agreements for water and sewer facilities to
provide that such agreements shall terminate within one year thereof
unless construction of the facilities has begun.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86.146
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HY AMhNDING THE PROVISIONS
RELATING TO PARTICIPATION AND PRO RATA REIMBURSE14ENT
AGREEMENTS FOR WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES TO PROVIDE THAT
SUCH AGREEMENTS SHALL TERMINATE WITHIN ONE YEAR THEREOF
UNLESS CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITIES HAS BEGUN; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. '
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meatin of August 5, 1986
Page B ghteen
McAdams motion, Riddlesperger second to ado?t the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
5. The Council considered taking vote of record on proposal to
consider a tax increase for FY 1986-87.
John McGrane, Director of Finance, reported that a public hearing
must be held and notice must be published regarding a tax increase.
Staff was recommending the public hearing be held on August 26 at
7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell further reported that the information
furnished by the Finance Department was not required by law and did
include the $221000,UUU in bonds. Staff was suggesting this notice
be added to the official notice which was required.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the tax rate could be lowered but
not raised.
McGrane responded yes.
McAdams motion, Chew second to proceed with the adoption of the 590
tax rate, on roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,"
Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and
Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
6. Consent Agenda
McAdams motion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agenda:
A. Bids:
11 Bid N 9630 - C1P Utilities Section C
21 Bid f 1.535 - Metal building
3. Bid 0 9639 - Meters, current transformers,
meter sockets
S. Plats and Replats:
1. Approval of preliminary plat of the Bonnie brae
Addition. {The Planning and Zoning Commission
. recommends approval.}
20 Approval of preliminary plat of the Denton
Nursing Center Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The
Planning and Toning Commission recommends
approval.)
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Noetin of August 5, 1986
Page N neteen
3. Approval of preliminary plat of the Golden
Triangle Mini-Mall Addition, Block A. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
apl, -&-ova l . )
4. Approval of preliminary plat, of the Medical
Center Addition, Section 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
S. Approval of final replat of Montecito Del Sur
Subdivision, Phase I, Lots 14-16 and 25-34, Block
A; Lots 5-8, Block D; Lets 2-110 Block E; Lots
1-18, Block N; Lots 1-20, Block G, and Lots 1-7,
Block H. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
C. Change Orders and Final Payments;
14 Consider approval of Change Order #2 in the
amount of $1,211 and final payment in the amount
of $24,424.69 to Advance Tank Texas Inc., for
the 2 MG ground storage tank. The Public
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
20 Consider approval of final payment to Dickerson
Construction in the amount of $38,508.53, Bid 0
9557 - 1986 Section B CIP, water and wastewater
improvements (water lines on Bolivar, Tulane and
Northridge and sewer lines Bolivar and forth
b1m). (The Public Utilities Board recommends
approval.)
31 Consider approval of final payment to Dickerson
Construction in the amount of $10,772.46, Bid 0
9592 - 1986 CIP Section G, water lines. (The
Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
4. Consider approval of final payment to Roy4Willis
Electric Company for an ovorview signal bore
project, Bid 0 9608, Purchase Order 0 73558.
D. Pro Rata Agreements;
14 Consider approval of a pro rata agreement with
Holbert-Wyatt Addition, owner Holbert-Wyatt
Volkswagen Inc., and/or their assigns, for a new
water line. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
7. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August S, 1986
Page Twenty
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-147
AN ORDINANCE ACCEP'T'ING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PUR.HASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES
OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR 0 EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "$ye," Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
Council Member Chew left the meeting.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
for public works or improvements.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO, 8614$
AN ORDINANCh ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR
THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORXS OR IMPROVEMENTS;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger "aye," and mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of ordinance setting a
date, time and place for public hearings concerning the annexation
of approximately 23.6420 acres of land being part of the Gideon
Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and beginning adjacent and north of
hdwards Road approximately 6.5 mile east of Mayhili Road and .S mile
west of Swisher Road. A-41
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported staff was recommending the
first public hearing be hold on August 19 and the second public
hearing be held on September 2.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-149
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS
DESCRIBED HEREIN BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THIS MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOT{CE OF
SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August S, 1986
Page Twenty-One
Alexander notion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
"aye", kiddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered adoption o£ an ordinance
approving a specific use permit in a single family (SP-10) zoning
district at 623 hctor Street for the operation of the Jane Marshall
School. S-18S
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-150
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE JANE
MARSHALL SCHOOL; PROVIDING FOR THE REFERENCING OF SUCH USE
ON THE ZUNING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS
ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-11 AND AS SAID
MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE CITY
AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BEING LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SENA AND ECTOR STREETS; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM
PENALTY OF $19000.00 FUR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR
A ShVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) to the
commercial (C) district on 4.024 acres located on T-35 South, south
of Pockrus Road and south of the M,K.&T. Railroad, Z-1812
Council Member Chew joined the meeting.
The following ordinance was presented:
N0. 86-151
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON
TEXAS, AS tiAME wAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 4.024 ACRES
OF LAND OUT UP THE GIDEON WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330
AS IS MOkh PAkTIGULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A
CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM
AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO
COMMERCIAL "C" CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY;
PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $1,000 FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Twenty-Two
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye",
kiddiesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to enter into an agreement between the City of
Denton and Deloitte, Haskins, and Sells as auditors for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 1986.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-152
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DULOITTE, HASKINS,
AND SELLS AS AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER
30, 1986, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
"aye", Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Notion carried unanimously.
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance of the
City of Denton, Texas, amending Chapter 10 (Fire Protection) of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas by the addition of
Article V hereto to be entitled "Alarm systems'"; requir:n; the
installation of smoke detectors in certain dwelling units.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-153
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C OF DENTON$ TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER
10 (FIRE PROTECTION) THE CODE OF Ok1;INANCES OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE V THERETO TO BE
ENTITLED "ALARM SYSTEMS"; REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF
SMOKE DETECTORS IN CERTAIN 114E LING UNITS; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $19000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
"aye", Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a contract for the City's participation in the cost of
installing an oversized water main.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this water main was
for Holbert/Wyatt Volkswagen at a cost to the City of $16,191.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Twenty-Three
The following ordinance was presented:
NCO. 86-154
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF INSTALLING AN OVERSIZED WATER
MAIN; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT:
APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE' AND PROVIDING
FUR AN hFFhCT1Vb DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
Riddlesperger "aye," chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Matiun
carried unanimously.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a contract for the City's participation in the cost of
installing an oversized water main.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-155
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF INSTALLING AN OVERSIZED WATER
MAIN; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT;
APPROVING THE hXPENDITURE OIL FUNDS THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew secona to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
J. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
prohibiting the parking of vehicles on the west side of Fry Street
between the intersections of West Oak and Scripture.
Jerry Clark, City Engineer, reported that the residents had
initiated this request and 80k of the property owners had signed a
petition in favor of the action.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-156
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING ThE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE
WEST SIDE Of FRY STREET BETWEEN THE INTERSECTIONS OF WEST
UAX AND SCRIPTURk; PROVIDING A SEVERAEILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCI,ED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Twenty-Four
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance, On roll call
vote McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
kiddiesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye," Motion
carried unanimously,
X. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting the dedication by deed from Barworth Corporation of
certain real property situated in the V.B. Gailor Survey, Abstract
No, 4521 Denton County, Texas, and recorded in Volu:ie 513, page 351
of the deed records of Denton County to the City oV Denton, for the
use of said property as a public street.
Jerry Clark, City Engineer reported that this dedication was for
right-of-way for necessary for the Stuart Street project,
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-157
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THh DEDICATION BY DEED FROM BARWORTH
CORPORATION OF CBRTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE V. E.
GAILOR SUkVbY, ABSTRACT N0. 4520 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND
RECORDED IN VOLUME 5130 RAGE 351 OF THE REED RECORDS OF
DhNTON COUNTY, TO THIS CITY OF DbNTON, TEXAS FOR THE USE OF
SAID PROPERTY AS A PUBLIC STREET AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance, On roll call
vote McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddiesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye," Motion
carried unanimously.
L. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving an amendment to the agreement between the City of Denton
and Freese and Nichols for engineering services in regard to the raw
water discharge/ pump station structure for Ray Roberts Reservoirs
.Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that approximately l8
months earlier, the City had entered into an agreement with Freese
and Nichols for this study. A realtor had assisted in looking for
potential sites with one of the primary issues being cost, Freese
and Nichols had then completed a flow analysis and staff had
relooked at the locations. The end result was a need to amend the
agreement and pursue sites further to the north. The cost of the
amendment would be $26,000,
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-I58
AN ORDINANCh APPROVING AN AMENDMhNT TO THE AGREEMENT
ENGINhERINGE SF.RVIChS DIN TO REGARD F TO TH B8 N ANOLSWA ER
DISCHARGE/ RUMP STATION STRUCTURR FOR RAY RODARTS RASBRVOIR,
AND PROVIDING F" AN SPIliCTIVB DATA.
.:.x+ r>;~i'. '±fi-,.,'. ^"~T f... ;3y +5 e•:i~r y.,. ;..:fi r~~{~
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of Au ust S, 1986
Page Twenty-F ve
Alexander motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdam; "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
M. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving an agreement between the City of Denton and Management
A licattons Consulting, Inc. for consulting services in connection
w~ h the 1986 rate study for electric, water and wastewater services.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that it was anticipated
that a 9% to 9.S; increase in water rates would be forthc)ming
during the year due to Lake Ray Roberts. There was also a need to
continue looking at electric rates due to co-generation and other
factors. Staff was recommending an outside consultant be retained
to insure that the rate structures were established in a prudent and
correct manner. The fee for the study would be $39,000 with a
completion date in September. Staff would also request that the
council appoint members to a steering committee for the rate study.
The following ordinance was presented:
Nu. 86-159
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
DENTON AND MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS CONSULTING, INC. FOR
CONSULTING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE 1986 RATE STUDY
FOR bLECTR1C, WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES, AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
14CAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
N. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with the cities of
Garland, Bryan, Greenville and Brazos Electric Power Cooperative,
Inc. relating to the sale of electrical power to Texas New Mexico
Power Company.
Bob Nelson, I,lrector of Utilities, reported that this ordinance
would authorize the sale of capacity to Texas New Mexico Power
Company, who did not generate electricity. The four TAjPA cities had
sold to Texas New Mexico and over the next six month period, the
city of Denton's portion of the sale would be approximately $400,000
to $430,000 with the possibility of a higher dollar figure for the
next year.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-160
AN ORLINANCL AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
WITH THE CITIES OF GARLAND, BRYAN, GREENVILLE AND BRAZOS
ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. RELATING ~0 TH~ gALB OF
ELECTRICAL POWER TO TEXAS NEW MEXICO POW COS ANY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE*
i,,F...
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August S, 1966
?Age Twenty-Six
McAdams notion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call voto McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye*"
Motion carried unanimously,
0. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to enter into an agreement between the City of
Denton, City of Bryan, City of Garland City of Greenville and
Enserch Gas Company for the sale of natural gas.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that, coupled with the
sale of power to Texas New Mexico Power Company, the City needed to
assure itself of low cost natural gas.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86.161
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LlTY OF DbNTON, CITY OF BRYAN, CITY
OF GARLAND, CITY OF GREENVILLE AND ENSERCH GAS COMPANY FOR
THE SAyb OF NATURAL GAS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATb.
0 Hopkins motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
P. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment. No. 1 to the Texas
Municipal Power Pool and interchange agreement by and between the
cities of Garland, Denton, Bryan, and Greenville and Brazos Electric
Power Cooperattve, Inc. relating to pool system operations.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this amendment
provided that if any member of the Pool did not have the required
reserve, no other member of the Pool would sell capacity to the
extent that the entire Pool did not have sufficient reserves. The
Pool member who was deficient would have the right to purchase
supplemental capacity from the other members.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-162
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT N0.
1 TO THE ThXAS MUNICIPAL POWER POOL AND INTERCHANGE
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITIES OF GARLAND, DENTON,
BRYAN, AND GkhENVILLE AND BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE
RELATING TO POOL SYSTEM OPERATIONS; AND DECLARING AND
EFFECTIVE DATED
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Twenty-Seven
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
kiddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
8. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution for
approval of sewer pipeline boring license for Pockrus Road sewer
line from Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company.
The following resolution was presented:
R h S 0 L U T 1 U N
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on
behalf of the City of Denton, Texas, a Pipe Line License Agreement
dated March 19, 1985, between the City of Denton and the
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company relating to the
construction, reconstruction, use, maintenance, repair and
installation by boring method, of one sanitary sewer line encased in
a carrier pipe not exceeding eight inches (811) in diameter at Mite
Post K-725.77, Denton County, Texas.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the Sth day of August, 1986.
RAY SIEMENS, RITUR
CITY OF DENTON,TEXAS
ATTEST:
CUROTTE o CITY SECRETM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
McAdams motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye," ktddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
. B. The Council considered approval of a resolution
approving a letter agreement with Heard, Goggan, Blair, Williams $
Harrison for the collection of delinquent utility accounts in
bankruptcy.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of August 5, 1986
Page Twenty-Eight
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, reported that this item had been
discussed at the July 1 meeting. A tax contract had been awarded;
however, the City Attorney was still handling utility bankrulftcy.
This would provide for one centralized handler,
The following resolution was presented:
Rh S 0 L U T I O N
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That the Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas be, and he is
hereby authorized, to execute on behalf of the City of Denton a
letter agreement for the collection of delinquent utility accounts
in bankruptcy between the City of Denton and Heard, Goggan, Blair,
Williams $ Harrison.
SECTION 116
That this resolution shall become effective immediately
upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the Sth day of August, 1986,
CITY OF DBNTON,ATEXAS
ATTEST:
H A "N, GUY S RU
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FURM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Chew motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesper$er "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens
aye. Motion carried unanimously.
91 Tabled Items
A. The Council considered the table item of the petition
of Don M. Bryant requesting a variance of provisions of the City of
Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations requiring
sidewalk, paving, curb and gutter, and drainage improvements for
City of Denton City council minutes
meeting of August S, 1986
Page Twenty-Nine
perimeter streets adjacent to proposed subdivisions. Two 3.0 acre
lots located adjacent and west of Hickory Hill Road between Gibbons
(toad and FM 1830 are proposed. The property is located in the City
of Denton 's area of extraterritorial jurisdiction (81'J) and single
family development is anticipated. V-30
The item removed tabled.
100 The Council considered nominations to be forwarded to the
Denton County Commissioners Court for an appointment to the Denton
County Housing Finance Corporation.
Mayor Stephens stated that Chris Hartung had resigned from the
Denton county Housing Finance Corporation to make roam for his
successor.
Chew motion, McAdams second to appoint Lloyd Harrell to the Denton
County Housing Finance Corporatton. Motion carried unanimously.
11. There were no miscellaneous matters from the City Manager
reported.
12. There were no items of Now business suggested by Council
Members for future agendas.
13. The Council considered appointments to the Board of
Advisors of Flow Regional Medical Center.
Debra -Drayovttch, City Attorney, reported that this was not a City
board and consideration of appointments could not be handled under
hxecutive Session.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he felt this item should be
resolved. A list of nominees from the Blue Ribbon Committee had
been produced and had been altered. Classifications had been
added. The Commissioner's Court had not acted. These nominees had
been chosen by the physicians at Flow Hospital; however,
substitutions could be made. The Council could not know who the
Commissioner's Court would appoint but 85 names had been submitted
and placed on the list.
Consensus of the Council was a continuance of this appointment
process with Council Members Riddlesperger and Alford dissenting.
14. Consider appointments to the Special Citizens Advisory
Committee on capital improvements.
This item was taken ender the Bxecuttve Session.
15. The Counc:l reconvened into the bxecutive Session to
discuss legal nutters real estate, personnel and board
appointments. No offtctai action was taken.
a
City of Denton City Council minutes
meeting of August S, 1986
Page Thirty
160 iio official action on kxecutive session items was taken.
With no further item of business, the meeting was adjourned,
CHARLOTTE r CITY SECRITUY
i
23270
i
CITY county MINUTES
August 19, 1946
The Council convened into the work Session at 5:30 p.m. in the
Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens, Mayor Pro Tom Alford Council
Members$ Alexander, Hopkins, MCA4ams and
Riddlesperger
ASSENT: Council Member Chew
I. The Council received the final version of the 1986
Denton Citizen's Survey and discussed the results.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager stated that this was a traditional
projdct done by the City which in the past had yielded some
very valuable information, He introduced Dr, Jim Glass to the
Council who was to give some formal results of the 1986 survey.
Dr. Glass reviewed the results of the survey with the Council
noting various areas where the results warranted comments. He
stated that areas of concern for Denton citizens were parka,
electricity, and utility billing. He noted that there was
significant support for bond programs with the majority of the
support going for streets/drainage rather than for parka, etc.
Renters were more willing to support the bond projects rather
than homeowners, Beautification was more specific this year
than others and sidewalks received more support than attractive
entrances,
Council Member Chew joined the meeting,
Glass concluded by pointing out that the citizens felt that
growth in the City was too fast but they supported different
types of growth. The citizens were willing to pay for services
--even adding new services,
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that the overall results
were encouraging--that the citizens were interested in what was
happening in Denton.
Council Member Alexander stated that the fact that the citizens
noted that the streets were improving was encouraging and
appreciated the effort that was done on the survey,
The Council then convened into a joint meeting with the Cable
TV Advisory Board at GOD p.m. in the Civil Defense ;zoom.
1. The Council and the Cable TV Advisory Board held a
discussion of procedures to be utilized by the Cable TV
Advisory Board in examining the new franchise for cable TV
service in the City of Denton.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephensl Mayor Pro Tom Alfordl Council
Membersr Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams, and
Riddlesperger
ABSENTS NOne
The Cable TV Advisory board was introduced with the following
members prosenti Gus Seligmann, Darlene Whitman, and
Charlie McNeill. The other members could not attend the
meeting.
Seligman:i stated that the TV Board would like to get some
dirdction from the Council regarding procedures for
re-negotiating for franohisement and why a consultant was
needed for the negotiations.
F
;.T ~s7;^ s*--xc~fa~-,, q , .mw~sa-.--•rc ,YFI+*', w_";'"T y l . .a e.. _ ;m;. ~ ~ v - .7:
City of Denton city council minutes
August 190 1986
Page Two
Julia Moore, Administrative for Public Works was introduced to
the Council and spoke for the Cable TV Board. She stated that
there were five items to consider during the negotiations.
Those areas were service evaluation, financial analysis of
present process, consumer market survey to see that new
services were needed if any, and legal aspects. A time frame
for this process would be 6-6 months. Due to the amount of
time required to properly address all of the issues, the Cable
TV Advisory Board was recommending that a consultant be hired
to assist in the process. Three proposals were currently being
looked at and a selection had not yet been made. It was the
feeling of the Cable TV Board that they wanted the Council to
give them the go ahead before they contacted one of the
consultants.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked how many years the franchise
was.
Moore replied it was a 10 year agreement,
Counci] Member Riddlesperger asked about the City about looking
into the possibility of owning the Cable TV company,
Bill Angelo, Assistant Director of ruolic works, stated that
the City of Denton was in a better position than other citie&
to own a cable company, There was a possibility that the City
could look into owning the company but at this time it was not
a very viable alternative.
Council Member McAdams asked when the current franchise ran out.
Moore replied in 1989,
Council Member Alexandsr asked what the Cable TV Board needed
from the Council.
Moore replied that the Board needed some direction from the
Council regarding what to do about a consultant.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked that would be gained from a
consultant,
8eligmann replied that the consultant could look at other areas
such as equipment, kinds of services, rather than just at rates,
council Member Hopkins stated that she felt the services of a
consultant was in order.
Council Member Chew agreed with her statement.
Council Member Alexander stated that he felt a full service
consultant was more desirable than a limited service consultant.
Council Member Chew asked to hear what the other Cable TV Board
members felt about the issue,
Ms, Darlene Whitman stated that a consultant was necessary
especially in the area of adequate legal advice.
Ms. Charlie McNeill stated that the Board should talk to the
cable TV company itself and get their ideas and their requests.
Mayor Stephens stated that it appeared that the consensus of
opinion of the Council was that a consultant would be in order.
8eligmann stated that the Board would like the authority to
hire the consultant and that they were not in favor of the
previous consultant that was hired,
City of Denton city council minutes
August 190 1986
Page Three
• Seligmann continued that CTIC has many errors in its
presentation and did not give good service. The Board did not
gEt what it had paid for. At the time the company was hired,
it was all-right but not at this time. His preference would be
a comprehensive company,
Debra Drayovitch, City Attornoy, stated that the contract would
have to go to Council since it would by for more than $101000.
The Cable TV Board could make the recommendation for which
company to use and then the Council would consider it.
Council Member Alexander stated that he would like to see the
Cable TV Board take an active role and develop recommendations
for the Council,
2, The Council conv6nod into the executive session to
discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel/board
appointments. No official action was taken,
The council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7100 p,m, in
the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENTI Mayor Stephenal Mayor Prn Tom Alford, Council
Members: Alexander, Chow, Hopkins, McAdams and
Riddiesperger
ASSENTI None
1, The Council received a gift from Mayor John Tilley,
Tea Tree Gulley, South Australia, presented by Rev. Roger
Hollar of Denton. Rev. Hollar presented Mayor Stephens with a
book dealing with the settlement of Toa Tree Gl.tlloy. flayor
Stephens thanked Rev. Holiar for the hook and stated that it
would be sent to the Library for everycno in the City to enjoy.
2. The Council received a presentation of the
Dollar-A-Bay awards to City of Denton employees.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, introduced Paulette Owens-Homes
who was the staff person in charge of the 'DAD' program.
Holmes stated that the program was deoi-ned to receive input
from City employees on how the City could save money. It was
created from the current fiscal situation at hand. It would be
run annually. Those employees receiving awards included
Ms. Pat Strickland, Mr. John Lobaugh, Mr. Greg Muirhead and
Ms. Marsha Williams,
Mayor Stephens thanked all of the winning employees and all of
the employees who participated in the program for their
efforta, and congratulated the winners on their money saving
ideas,
3. Public Hearings
A. The council held a public hearing concerning the
petition of Donny Doeter requesting approval of a specific use
permit is a single family (BP-10) Zoning district to permit the
development of a 208 bed nursing home on a 4.9 acre tract
located on the west side of Carroll Boulevard approximately
11500 feet north of U,S, Highway 380 (University Drive). The
property is further described as a tract in the R, Beaumont
Survey, Abstract 51.
Before the public hearing began, Mayor Stephens presented to
the audience the rules regarding speaking before the Council
during public hearings.
r
City of Denton city council minutes
August:l,), 1986
Paqe pou.
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Mr, Donny Doster spoke in favor of thL petition. He stated
that there currently was a nursing home located on the property
and that they wanted to expand the facility. Currently they
were at 981 capacity and were sending patients to Dallas. He
requested that the Council approve the specific use permit,
Mr. Lee Keith, Denton County Veteran Service Representstivc,
spoke in favor of the petition. Mr. Keith stated that the
present nursing home provided economical beds for people such
as the veterans he assisted. He encouraged the council to pass
the petition.
Mr. Greg Edwards, Metroplex Engineering, spoke in favor of the
petition. He stated that the developer had completed all of
the needed requirements and asked the Council to vote in favor
of the petition,
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Urban planner, stated a specific use permit was
granted by the City council for this property in 1969. At that
time there was no ordinance adopted, or site plan adopted for
that specific use permit. Over the years a nursing home
facility developed and currently there was a facility existing
containing 148 beds, The application would be two fold. One
to request an additional 60 beds and second, the granting of
the specific use permit would legitimise the existing
facility. The proposal complies with all of the requirements
of the Development Guide and the zoning ordinance, The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of tho
proposal with a 6-0 vote.
11 The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a specific use permit to permit the de.teiopment of a
206 bed nursing home on a 4.9 acre tract located on the west
side of Carroll Boulevard approximately 10500 feet north of
U,S, Highway 380 (University Drive).
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO, 86-163
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CYTY OF DENTON, TEXAS, GRANTING A
SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A NURSING HOMEI PROVIDING FOR
THE REFERENCING OF SUCH USE ON THE ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY OF DEN:ON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPT:,D AS AN
APPENDIX TO THE COPE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND
AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 4,9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF CARROLL BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY
11500 FEET NORTH OF U. S. HIGHWAY 380, AS IS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINI PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM
PENALTY OF 010000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFI AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFCECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "a,re," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye," Rtddlespergar "eye," Chek 'aye, and Mayor
Stephens "eye," Motion carried unanimously.
i • i- +ia' "i"w° ,',,,+'7F~..'`"-°-e' F r{.;~ ..-..'mow mo.'s aR_ -Fi` W° r f
z City of Denton city council minutes
l August 19, 1986
Page Five
B. The Council held a public hearing concerning a
petition of Dimension Development Company requesting an
amendment to a planned development (po.19/PD-82) and approval
of a concept plan for the single family single family
(SP-7), cluster housing and park areas located east of Lillian
Miller Parkway at the intersection of Teasley Lane (PM 2181).
The 161.7 acres was zoned planned development by ordinance
84-109 and permits the development of cluster, multi-family,
general retail, single family - 10,000 square feet, single
family - 7,000 square feet, office, perk and a community
facility site.
The amendment would change three areas:
19.00 acres - Pror;r cluster housing with a total of
120 units
To: Single Family with a minimum lot
size of
7,000 square feet
30.39 acres - Proms Single Pamily with a minimum lot
size of
10,000 square feet
To: Single Family with a minimum lot
size of
7,000 square feet
28.93 acres - From: Cluster housing with a total of
314 units
Tor Cluster housing with a total of
339 units
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr, Rick Neff spoke in favor of the petition, He asked the
Council to approve the usage changes that they were suggesting
and approval of the concept plan which would give a better idea
of exactly what kind of development was going to take place.
Council Member Riddlesporger asked if the developers planned to
pave the other two lanes of Lillian Miller Parkway,
Neff replied no.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that part of the problem
was in terms of access and wondered why the paving of Miller
was not in the plan.
Neff stated that it was not in the plan at this point and did
not know if it would be in the future.
Council Member McAdams asked if there was going to be
right-of-way left for the paving.
Neff replied yes that the right-of-way was already dedicated.
Mr. Jerry Cott spoke in favor of the petition. He stated that
at the beginning of this development, an 8' stone or brick wall
was to be built between his property and the developing
property, He wanted to make sure that the wall wad in the
petition and would be built. He also stated that all of the
property in that area was zoned on a first-come, first-serve
basis. SP-16 zoning was the only zoning available that would
not go over the City's Development Guide.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
August 19, 1986
Page Sir
Me. Claudia Brown spoke in opposition of the petition. She
asked that if the petition was approved it would increase
traffic and that it was very difficult now to get in and out on
Lillian Miller Parkway.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, r an Planner stated the the planned development
was already approved and in place by ordinance 84-109. This
wA3 an amendment to that ordinance and a request for approval
of a concept plan. She stated that additional right-of-way had
been provided by the developers to construct the additional two
lanes of Lillian Miller Parkway. She stated that in the
original ordinance there was not a condition that a fence be
built between the two properties in question, Technically, the
problem of the fence whould be addressed during the detailed
planning stage and not at this point in time, Overall change
does not change the intensity or density in the area. Planning
and Zoning approved the petition by a vote of 5-1. Nine reply
forms were mailed with one returned in favor.
Mayor Stephens asked that the density would not be changed,
Carson replied that certain areas would increase but the
elimination of the cluster housing and the reduction to single
family (SF-7) caused a significant reduction in that area.
Mayor Stephens asked now the development would affect the
property to the south.
Carson replied that it would provide additional flexibility to
developers in the future. The surrounding zoning would be
looked at when considering a new proposal in that area.
Mayor Stephens asked about the property to the north.
Carson replied that the property to the north was single family
with 10,000' lots. The density was not significantly altered
with the change.
Mayor Stephens asked No. Carson to address the question raised
by No. Brown concerning the traffic problems.
Carson stated that the intensity was not going to be changed so
the traffic generation would stay the a&A*,
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, added that Lillian Miller was a
part of the Capital Improvement Program that was filed with the
Council by the Planning and Zoning Commission, it called for
funding to complete Lillian Miller to a four lane section,
Council Member Alford asked that in regard to the buffer wall,
was it included in the amendment.
Council Member McAdams stated that it was not included in the
amendment.
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that the appropriate
time to insert the requirement for the screening would be in
the detailed site plan approval stage.
Council Member Alford asked how they could be assured that it
would be there.
ITF
4• T r ff
City of Denton amity Council Minutes
August 190 1086
Page Seven
Carson explained that the amendment did not affect the entire
southern boundary of the project, it affects only one small
part of the project, There could be more problems if the wall
were to be required before the detailed site plan was worked
out than to wait until the entire plan was developed. The
letters and statements from Mr. Cott and the noted conditions
in the minutes of the Planning and Zoning meeting, and in the
city Council minutes would assure that the wail would be noted.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving an amendment to a planned development (PD-10/Po-82)
and approval of a concept plan for the single family (8F-10),
single family (SF-7), cluster housing and park areas.
The following ordinance was presented.
1 NO. 86-164
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TE%AS► APPROVING A
REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 84-109, AS SAID
PLAN APPLIES TO 161.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED EAST OF
LI6LIAN MILLER PARKWAY AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH
TEASLEY LANE, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN= AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance as
presented and to add as a note in the minutes that council
desires that a'c the time of the review of the detailed site
plan, a solid fence along the southern boundary be incorporated
into the detailed site plan. on roll call vote, McAdams "aye,"
Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger
"aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
C. The Council held a public hearing on a petition
of Jack Price, representing First Texas Medical, Inc.,
requesting approval of a detailed plan and preliminary plat on
4.849 acres of a planned development (PD-1). The property is
located at 2026 West University and shown in the Robsrt
Beaumont Survey, No, 31. If approved, the development of a
psychiatric hospital would be permitted with standards as shown
on the detailed plan.
The mayor opened the public hearing,
Mr. Bob Gladney► Psychological Institutes of America, spoke in
favor of the petition, He stated that the development Of the
hospital was a joint venture between First Texas Medical and
Psychological Institutes of America, it would be run and
managed by Psychological Institutes of America. He stated that
there was a need for thiP service in this area and would
provide benefits to the community in the form of approximately
150 jobs in the area,
NO one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that the site plan had
been approved by the Council. It was a formar osteopathic
hospital And would not change intensity/density. All of the
former conditions had been removed except that the site plan he
submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Council
for approval. The plan conforms to all City ordinances. Seven
reply forms were mailed with 1 returned in favor and 1 returned
in opposition. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the
plan unanimously.
rTATIM Xi 4 :r
r
r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
August 190 1986
Page Eight
1. The Council considered an ordinance adoption of
an ordinance approving a detailed plan and preliminary plat on
4.849 acres of a planned development (PD-1).
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 06-165
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A
DETAILED PLAN FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS SAID PLAN APPLIES
TO 4.8 ACRES OF LAND 1,0^ATED AT 2026 WEST UNIVERSITY
DRIVEr AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $1,000.00 FOR
VIOLATIONS THERBOPI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye," Hopkins 'aye,'
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and mayor
Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
D, The Cuuneil held a public i.earing to consider a
petition of Whisonant Properties requesting a change in zoning
from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned
Oevelopment (PD) district and approval of a concept plan on a
60.2 acre tract located on the south side of East McKinney
Street (FM 426) approximately 650 feet west of Loop 288. The
property is further described in the M. Yoachum Survey,
Abstract 1442, and the Mary L. Austin Survey, Abstract 4. If
approved, the planned development will permit the following
land uses:
Parcel A - Garden Office - 5.77 acres
Parcel B - Two Family (Duplex) - 14.21 acres
- 130 total units with a density of 9.15 units per
acre
Parcel C - Single Family Attached - 40.02 acres
478 total units with a density of 11.95 unite per
acre
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Jim McElhaney spoke in favor of the petition. He stated
that the developers had been before the Planning and Zoning
Commission three times and had been denied three times. He
presented to the Council a map detailing the development. He
stated that in May the developers presented to the Planning and
zoning Commission a concept kith lower density and that concept
was denied. Staff recommended lowering the dwelling units and
eliminating the general retail. He stated that there was a
need for this concept plan in Denton. They were not asking for
zoning, they were asking for approval of their concept plan.
Mr. Gwendyl Mulkey spoke in favor of the petition. He stated
that lie and his family had formally owned this property and
still owned yroperty next to the proposed development. He
stated three reasons for approval of the development: the
property met the Denton Development Guide for moderate
intensity, the property would be more useable than it is now,
and he personally felt that it would benefit Denton in the area
of increased taxes and jobs.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
77t
City of Denton City council Minutes
August 190 1906
Page Nine
Denisa Spivey, Urban Planner, stated that the property was
located in a low intensity area being primarily residential in
nature. The area was already over the intensity standard and
this development would further intensify the intensity. The
office parcel exceeded the standard, Another question dealt
with the compatibility of the development with surrounding land
uses, There currently existed a S! subdivision, a PD-66, and a
platted subdivision. The surrounding land uses were designated
single family. She stated that since planning and Zoning had
denied the petition, there would be needed a 6 out of 7
favorable vote to pass the petition. Eight reply forms were
mailed out with 5 returned in favor, zero in opposition.
Council Member McAdams stated that she would like to see this
property developed with single family detached houses. The
area was overloaded with apartment complexes and the additional
office space was not needed.
Council Member Alford was concerned with the fact that three
times this particular developer had gone to Planning and Zoning
and had been denied three times, He questioned if it would be
appropriate to send this proposal back to Planning and Zoning
for a further look at the situation of first-come, ftrst-serve
which appeared to be happening here.
Chew motion, McAdams second to accept the recommendation of
Planning and Zoning Commission for denial, on roll call vote,
McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,' Alford "nay,"
Riddlesperger "nay," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion to deny passed 5-2 with Council Member Riddlesperger and
Mayor Pro Tom Alford casting the "nay" votes.
E. The council held a public hearing on a petition
of City of Denton requesting an amendment of an existing
planned development (PD-60), and approval of a revised detailed
plan, on a a 12.08 acre tract located on the east side of Audra
Lane approximately 152 feet north of Paisley Street. The
property is further described as a tract in the Jonathan Brook
Survey, Abstract 55. if approved, the amendment will change
the rear yard setback from a 30 foot minimum to a 15 foot
minimum buildings setback.
The mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The mayor closed the public hearing.
M
Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, stated that the original planned
development was approved as a basic zero lot line development
with a private pack area. The development was recently amended
to provide front/cezr/side yard setbacks to define building
separations which wens not presented in the original plan as
wall as to eiiminatt the private park area from the proposal.
The building plans included a 30' rear setback, The new plans
submitted by the developer had lesser setbacks which required
the latest amendment, The 15' yard setback was consistent with
other developments. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval by a 5-2 vote,
Council Member McAdams asked why there was a change in the size
of the setbacks.
Cpivey stated that the developer stated that the houses with
larger square footage were doing better in the marketing
.S " City of Denton City Council Minutes
August 190 1986
Pays Ten
Surveys and designed larger houses for some of the remaining
lots, The larger houses would have encroached into the 30
setback and all of the houses now planned would work with the
15' setback.
The following ordinance was presentedt
NO. 86-166
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
APPROVED BY ORDINANCE N0. 86-124 FOR 13.4 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED EAST OF AUDRA LAMB AND NORTH OF PAISLEY
S
TREET, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN) TO
PROVIDE A IN REAR YARD I
PROVIDINGF FOR A PENALTYOIN THE A MOUNT OF $1,000.00A OR
VIOLATIONS THEREOFI AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "eye," Hopkins "aye,'
Alford aye, Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and mayor
Stephens "ays," Motion carried unanimously.
F. The Council held a public hearing concerning the
proposed annexation of approximately 131,64 acres of land being
part of the 0. Walker Survey, Abstract No, 1330, and part of
the W, Durham Survey, Abstract No. 300, and beginning at a
point approximately one mile south of FM 426 (East McKinney)
and 1 1/2 miles north of I-35E. (A-37)
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, stated that this was a City of
Denton initiated annexation. The purpose was to have all of
the property that would be included within the proposed
thoroughfare for the proposed Lakeview Development in the City
of Denton. The Parke and Recreation Department requested
additional acreage be added to the request for annexation for
their planning purposes. There had been no objection to this
annexation as proposed.
No one spoke in opposition.
McAdams motion, Chew second to continue annexation process.
Motion carried unanimously.
0. The Council held a public hearing concerning the
proposed annexation of approximately 23.6420 acres of land
being part of the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 13300 and
beginning adjacent and north of Edwards Road approximately .5
mile east of Mayhill Road and ,5 mile west of Swisher Road.
(A-41)
David Ellison, Senior Planner, stated that this was a voluntary
Petition for annexation. The staff saw no objection to the
annexation. One reply form was mailed, zero in response, A
second public hearing would be in two weeks.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to continue the annexation
process. The motion carried unanimously,
4. The Council received a report on a staff analysis of a
revised concept plan on the request of M41 R. Lacquement for a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the
planned development (PD) classification. The property consists
of 412.12 acres located on the west side of FM 1164
approximately 1,850 feet north of Hercules Lane. (Z-1815)
~ t`Y
kt' ~.f.. i",.`&vF a£' iR °n 9=, •3 g`. ys* .iyasn -..rr .;a,"'.. sm s~ Y!
-"ili~rr-"T%xe.-°E`y'#! V a' 71,
City Of Denton City Council Minutes
August 19# 1986
Page slave"
• Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this was the item that
was before the Council two weeks ago. At that time, staff
stated that they would analyse the AS and get an
ordinance prepared for this meeting. The planning staff was
ready to give a complete analysis of the proposal but the
ordinance was not ready due to problems in the legal
descriptions provided by Lacquement.
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that at the Wednesday
night Planning and Zoning meeting the field notes were
furnished, Thursday afternoon a req.rest was submitted) and due
to the work load of the staff, it was not possible to prepare
the ordinance.
Council member Hopkins removed herself from the meeting,
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, presented the staff report. She
stated that there were four changes that the developer had made
from the time that tha development was presented to the
Planning and Zoning Commission and when it was presented to the
Council. Those items were requests that the staff had made to
the developer prior to the recommendation to the Planning and
Zoning Commission and were not made until the Council meeting,
Those items concerned the northern collector street which the
staff had requested be term:nated because of a problem with the
113 mile separation betwe(,n the intersection of FM 2164 and
Loop 288, The 1/3 spacing was necessary for any collector
street to most in order for safety reasons and for
signalization. It was terminated and no access would be
permitted from the office area on to the collector streut. The
second change was concerning the multi-family density in the
moderate intensity area which would in effect be expanded if
the proposal was approved to slightly over 100 acres. The
multi-family in question was reduced from the proposal
presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission of 20 units per
acre to 18 units per acre, This would provide additional
flexibility for anyone requesting additional multi-family in
that moderate intensity area because 750 is the maximum
amount. The intensity in that moderate area would still be at
capacity if the proposal was approved. The third change was
with the multi-family use on the western border of the
proposal, The property abuts a light industrial area and was
requested as a transition between the single family and the
light industrial. The total number of units was reduced to 200
wnieh did not violate the multi-family concentration. The last
change was a reduction in the townhouse area in the northwest
corner of the proposal. This property was part of the low
intensity area to the south, The concentration of one type of
land use was not recommended by the Development Guide. :his
would still remain as one type of land use being townhouses)
the change would be in the density that was being proposed.
The proposal as shown would reduce the overall density by 127
units by changing one area to 8 units per acre, the area to the
east would be 6 units per acre and the third parcel would
remain as a 10 unit per acre, The changes as submitted did
make the proposal much better as for as land planning was
concerned. T approved, the request for the low intensity area
and the moderate intensity area would be at capacity. The
staff did receive a proposal for the two adjacent properties to
be coned and they were in the process of going to Planning and
Zoning. A number of conditions were recommended by staff to be
added to the proposal if the Council approved it. The
conditions covered transportation situation which the proposal
could not develop unless the transportation improvements were
made.
.r y3C •-x;94 p~°'-f.,`sK§,",i`f.T'~i✓,;;~, ,~'1}"r~~" :9~F,r~~~p°` °r =.a,~ 'v w.},a y
e
city of Denton city council Minutes
August 12, 1986
Pago Twelve
Council Member McAdams asked that it the area was at capacity,
would the a,d,jacent property be zoned SF -7,
Carsons replied that the remainder property in the low
intensity area would be required to be toned Sr-10 so as not to
violate the intensity standard, It would be looked at as a
compatibility of the surrounding property.
Council Member McAdams stated that the Council should look at
the area now so that subsequent requests could be dealt with
fairly.
Alexander motion, Chew second to direct staff to prepare and
bring back an ordinance and include the recommendations staff
had made. The motion carried unanimously,
Council Member Hopkins returned to the meeting,
5, consent Agenda
Chew motion, Alexander second to approve the consent Agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agendas
A, aide and purchase Ordersi
1. P.O, 074672 - Robert Filters Corporation -
$14,101.10
2, P.O. 074752 - General Electric Company -
$32,596.00
3. aid 09640 - Repair cooling Towers
B, Plats and Replete:
1, Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Denton Square Shopping Center Addition, (The
Planning and zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
2. Approval of preliminary plat of the Green and
Moore Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary plat of the
Holbert-Wyatt Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
4. Approval of final replat of the Riowa Trail
Estates Addition, Lots 1-30, Block A. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
C. Contracts
Consider approval of a lease between the City of
Denton and Doris M. Shiflet for office space at
110 W. Oak.
6, Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bide and providing for the sward of
contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or
services.
>d , ~V 'r." },..y . y~:.r s€ra;•- ay+~}:.^..a , s ~ - s .x. ; <n- "RY c^
MIV11-11W, 11
a City of Denton City Council Minutes
August 19, 1986
Page Thirteen
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-167
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS" RQUIPMENT,
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES1 PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye,** Riddlesperger "aye,' Chew "aye," and Mayor
Stephens aye. Motion carried unanimously,
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements,
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-166
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING
FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR
IMPROVEMENTS] PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFOR! AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Alexander motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye,"
Alford *ayi," Riddlesperger *aye,' Chew "aye," and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion curried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
that authorized an increase in the number of c;ertifiod police
officers.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this ordinance was a
Civil Service requirement that once positions in the Police
Department were approved, the City Council must authorize
additional strength, Fuur of the positions had already been
filled. Two other positions were currently being tested for
and those should be filled moon after October 11 1986.
The following ordinance was presentedr
NO. 86-169
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE NUMBER OF PERSONS
AUTHORIZED TO BE EMPLOYED IN EACH CLASSIFIED POSITION
IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXABI REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IN
CONFLICT HEREWITH, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams *aye,* Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye,*
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew *ays,* and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered approval of an ordinance
for proposed oversize agreement with Greenfield-Woods Addition,
Owner Teasley Road Associates, Denton, Texas, and/or their.
Assigns for a new sanitary sewer line,
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that this ordinance
was for an oversizing between and 18" and a 10" sewer line.
The area was near the new Loop 288 project. Total cost for the
city was $79,280. The Public Utility Board recommended
approval,
c '°~S;C1",u''''' .,-.,'S. j~'yi`1°' a' jl°s °~s- r3 ~-@'f';9u:'s,i:-. 5• -w .-y:, x.*z, i+
2., 1
City of Denton City council Mint,tes
August 190 1466.
Page Fourteen
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 66-177
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF INSTALLING AN OVERSIZED
SEWERMAIN; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
CONTRACTS APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
' THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance, On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins 'aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "dye," Chew "aye, and Mayor
Stephens "aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
7. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
requesting that the Federal Communications Commission expedite
its hearing process in the allocation of MHz bands 821-825 and
886-870 for use by public safety agencies,
Bill Angelo, Assistant Director of Public Works, stated that
several 800 frequencies were becoming available by the FCC,
Many cities felt that these frequencies should be reserved for
use by public safety agencies. He recommended that the Council
adopt this resolution in support of that position.
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, additional emergency radio frequencies are
urgently needed for City public safety use in order to promote
the health and safety of the publict and
WHEREAS, the City Council has been advised that the
city of Mesquite has requested that the Federal Co.munications
Commission allocate MHz bands 821-825 and 866-870 Cor public
safety user
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OENTON, TEXAS:
IIECTI I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton urges the
Federal Communications Commission to expedite its hearing
process in the allocation of MHz bands 821-825 and 866-870 in
order to mutt urgent needs of public safety units.
SECTION 11.
That the City Council of the City of Denton urges that
in the Commission's determination, effect be given to the
Congressional intent of Public Law 98-214 and that MHz bands
821-825 and 866-870 be allocated to public safety use.
SECTIQN III.
That the City Secretary is hereby directed to forward
a copy of this resolution to the Honorable Mark e, Fowler,
Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission and to
Brunhilde Nystrom, Mayor of the City of Mesquite, Texas.
s •:t4 `.>.wr:s.
" :qty 717
r
.z
City of Dentoo city council minutes
August 190 1986
Page Fifteen
SECTION IV.
That this resolution take effect immediately from and
after its passage as the law in such cases provides,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of August, 1986.
RAY RTE ENS, RAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
A TE LEN, I SEER-31M
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEDAL FORM:
DHSRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DZNTON, TEXAS
BY:
Alexander motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved.
On roll call vote, McAdam,. "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins
"aye," Alford "aye," Riddlea(,erger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor
Stephens "aye.' Motion carriad unanimously.
0. The council considered approval of 9 resolution
in support of Denton filing for an application for a grant from
the Texas Wuter Development Board to study regional water needs
for communities and non-incorporated areas in Denton county and
supporting Denton serving as the administrator for such grant
on behalf of the "Water for the Future Committee for Denton
County."
Bob Nei.son, Director of Utilities, stated the this grant would
allow various communities to study the needs of water supply
fot the entire Denton County area, The County would be the
administrator but could not apply for the grant, Denton was
provider of water which was one of the stipulations of the
grant.
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the Texas Water Development Board has funds
available for grants for studying regional water supply issues:
and
WHEREAS, the Water for the PutUre Cosueittee of Denton
County has been exploring water supply issues for cities and
non-incorporated areas of Denton county and desires to acquire
such fundingi and
WHEREAS, the offices of the Denton County
Commissioners Court have provided the administrative services
in coordinating these study efforts and in receiving
engineering proposals for conducting such study: and
WHEREAS, the Water Development Board funds aro only
available to existing water utility entitiest and
•
TIM
City Of Ponton city Council Minutes
August 190 1986
page sixteen
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is empowered and
authorized to operate a water system pursuant to Article 1108,
Tex. Rev, Civ. Stat, and other applicable laws; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN TON:
SECTION I.
That the City of Denton, on behalf of the Water for
the Future Committee of Denton County, desires to submit an
a plication for funding assistance for a study to investigate
alternatives for providing water supplies to cities and
unincorporated areas of Denton County.
SECTION II.
That the City Manager of Denton is hereby authorized
and directed to make application for such funds,
SECTION III,
That the City of Denton desires to serve as
administrator of said grant on behalf of Water for the Future
Committee of Denton County, provided that the administration
costs be proportionately shared by members of the committee.
ffjCTION IV.
That funds for preparing the application for subject
grant be supplied from pledged funds collected from member(s)
of the subject committee.
SECTION V.
That a certified copy of this Resolution shall
constitute an application and request on behalf of the City of
Denton to the Texas Water Development Board pursuant to
5355.1060 Texas Administrative Code, for approval of the
funding described in Section 1 of this Resolution.
SECTION VI.
That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval,
PASSED AND APPROVED this 19th day of August, 1966.
R , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTf
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRITARY
CITY OF DENTON,tTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
i
F.
t~5y r. , _ .
city of Denton City Council Minutes
August 19, 1986
Page seventeen
McAdams motion, Alexander second that the resolution be
approved. On roil call vote, KCAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,'
Hopkins 'aye,' Alford 'aye,' Riddlespergor "aye,' Chew 'aye,"
and Mayor Stephens "aye.' Motion carried unanisously,
C. The Council considered apppproval of a resolution
for condemnation of approximately 0.5011 acres (located in.
South MCCracksli Survey, Abstract No, 817) needed for Stuart
Road Right-of-Way between Juno and Loop 288 from Joseph J.
Tallal Development.
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, stated that the City had
tried to negotiate with the developer in this area for the
right-of-way so as to extend Stuart Road. The developer had
not agreed to what the city considered a fair market price so
staff recommended approval of this resolution.
The following resolution was presentedt
R E S 0 L V T I 011
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton has
herotofors determined the necessity for and ordered the
acquisition by the City of Denton of the hereinafter described
right, title and interest in the land hereinafter describedt and
WHEREAS, the City ,f Denton has been unable to agree
and cannot agree with t'ae owner upon the value of the
hereinafter described right, title and interest in the
hereinafter described land situated in the City of Denton,
Denton County, Texas, NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, THATI
SECTION It
The City Council hereby finds and determines that it
is necessary to acquire the hereinafter described vighte, title
and interest in the hereinafter described land, and that it is
necessary thEt it authorize proceeding in eminent domain to
acquire the right, title and interest in the hereinafter
described property.
SECTION II.
The City Attorney of the City of Denton, Texas; is
hereby aW,horized and directed to bring condemnation proceeding
to obtain the fee simple title, including all improvements
thereof, to the following tract of lane: situated in Denton
County, Texas:
ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and
bring part of the S. McCracken Survey, Abst. No. 817, and also
being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Denton 185, LTD
to Joseph J. Tallal, Jr.. Trustee by deed January 18, 1965
recorded in Volume 1718, Page 219 of the Deed Records of Denton
County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the southwest corner of the south tract, said
point lying in center of Stuart Lane;
THENCE north 06 091 east along the west boundary line of said
trait and in Stuart Lane, a distance of 705.0 feet to a point
for a corner;
THENCE east a distance of 13.0 feet to a point for a corner;
qr..:e., r^A+"s `a.., #5' fr 'Y im T -i ~e i t «..n.. S.n,i, -°c ftvpYPti'
t
city of Denton city Council Ninutes
August 190 1986
Page 6igbteon
THENCL south 5' 43' east a distance of 205.43 feet to a point
for a corners
THENCE south 00 09' west, 34 feet east of and para',iel to the
west boundary line of said tract, a distance of 501.0 feet to a
point for a corner, said point lying in the south boundary line
of said tracts
THENCE north 89' 18' 10" west, along the south boundary line of
said tract, a distance of 34.0 fast to the place of beginning
and containing 0.5011 acres of land, more or less, of which
0.1780 acres lies within Stuart Road for a net of 0.3231 auras.
For street and utility purposeal with the title thereto vesting
in the City of Dentoni however, there is excluded from said
prcperty to be condemned all the oil, gas and sulphur which can
be removed from beneath said land without any right whatever
remainin
fromrthof said 6 surfacelofgsaidnlandsulphur the ingress
of exploring, developing, drilling or mining the same.
SECTION III0
This Resolution shall become effective from and after
ita date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of August, 1986.
RA S EP ENS, Y R
CITY OF DENTON
ATTEST:
CRXILOTTE LLE , CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DLNTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.
Hopkins motion, Alexander second that the resolution be
approved. On roll call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander 'aye,"
Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye," Riddleeperger 'aye," Chew 'aye,'
and Mayor Stephens "aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
8. The Council considered approval of a proposal to allow
the Mayor and the City Manager of the City of Denton to approve
and sign the promulgation statement and the City of Denton
Emergency Management Plan in accordance with the Texas DisasLer
Act of 1975 and City ordinance 465-48, civil Defense (chapter
7).
Bill Angelo, Assistant Director of Public Works, stated that
this was a major revision of the emergency management plan
which was last revised in 1980. The major change was that the
program would remain a joint venture with the City and the
County but there would be two separate plans for emergencies.
Chew motion, MCAda.is second to approve the proposal. Motion
carried unanimously.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
August 19, 1986
Page Nineteen
Tabled item
Bryant requesting Cau va tacoesid ed the Petition of Don M.
Denton Subdivision and Land Development provisions nse r quiring
sidewalk, paving, curb and gutter, and drainage improvements
for perimeter streets adjacent to proposed subdivisions. Two
3.0 acr4t lots located adjacent and west of Hickory Hill Road
• between Gibbons Road and !M 1830 are proposed. The property is
located in the City of Denton's area of extraterritorial
jurisdiction (ETJ) and single family development is anticipated.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to remove the item from the
table. K)tion carried unanimously.
Debts Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that Dick Kelsey had
met with her and ,roe Morris on two occasions and tried to work
out the problem with th~< variance. She continued that there
was a very good and honest disagreement as to whether or not
the law requires that a piece of property in a situation such
as Mr, Bryant's be platted and subject to thane requirements.
We explored the possibility of obtaining an Attorney General's
opinion on the case and have a contract between L. a city and
M
favor of r, Bryant whareby the Attorney General's pinion caste down in
an would escrow
improvements he ThCityp ere was he
by the Attorney " General
that subdivision rules applied to those developments within the
City limits as well as in the ETJ.
Council members Hopkins asked if it was correct that because
the location of the property was a certain distance from the
city and :loser to the City of Argyle that it would be legally
within our rights to grant a variance.
Drayovitch answered yea, in her opinion,
Council Member Chew read from a memo from the City Attorney, 'I
would offer the comment of legalities aside, r believe that in
view of the distance of Mr. Bryant's property from the city
limits, r certainly think it would be a reasonable decision for
the City Council to grant the variance, r might add that upon
review of the conditions set forth and the regulations that
must be met to warrant a variance, it is my opinion that they
are overly strict. I requested Joe to take a good look at
these criterias and his revision of the regulations and to
draft some revisions to this particular section,'
Council Member McAdams stated that she was unclear about the
phrase 'legalities aside",
Drayovitch replied that she felt it was almost impossible for
anyone to meet those criteria, She stated that it was not a
legal decision, it was a factual determination by the council
as to whether or not those criteria are met,
Council Member Alexander asked the Attorney that was it her
opinion that granting of the variance would not make it more
difficult for the Council to enforce the requirements in other
situations.
Drayovitch replied yea, that was her opinion.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that it was the position of
the staff that in view of the City Attorney's finding, that
indeed there was some question on both sides concerning the
enforcing of these standards. Staff would suggest that the
Council look at this as an individual item and that if the
~.rs„. , r"^ ~ •c'F f Y +++qs~ s~'~` .e.s+ ~ . .-sz„^ R°'+ ~:z v; 'tom..;-'T~S'~e~h a.q v~+.car ra.., _~~i`~,';
r< rX City of Denton city council minutes
August 19, 1906
Page Twenty
Council found that because of the individual circumstances that
this did warrant a variance, then grant the variance.
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to grant the variance.
Notion carried by a 5-2 vote with McAdams and Stephens casting
"nay" votes.
10. The Council received a report on miscellaneous matters
from the City Council.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell stated that there would be continued
budget hearings on Saturday. These -4ouid be held in the Civil
Defense Room.
11. New Business
No items of New Business were suggested by Council
Members for future agendas.
12. The Council considered an appointment. to the North
Texas Higher Education Authority.
Mayor Stephens stated that the reason for the need of an
appointment according to Ms. Nita Stallings, was that the
position from North Texas would soon be vacant.
McAdams motion, Chew second to select Mr. Lindsey Keffer.
Motion carried unanimously.
13. The Council considered authorizing the mayor to
establish a senior Citizens Opportunities Committee,
chow motion, Alexander second to authorize the Mayor to
establish a Senior Citizens Opportunities Committee. Motion
carried unanimously.
Emergency Agenda Item
Tt,e Council considered a resolution in support of not
cutting funds to higher education.
The following resolution was presentedt
R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, at this critical Juncture in the Select
Committee on Higher Education's study, as the Legislature meets
in a crucial e?ecial session to consider issues of extreme
importance to his State, the City Council of the City of
Denton is of the opinion that any attempt to solve the deficit
pproblems facing the State solely by reducing expenditures would
be short-sighted, and most detrimental to the future of higher
education in Texast NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP DENTON, TE%ASt
i
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton. Texas
calls upon the Legislature to consider favorably a combination
of judicious spending reductions and the enactment of
legislation providing for additional sources of public
funding. By following this equitable and reasonable course,
the Legislature will assure our colleges and universities of
continued support and our citizens will be assured that public
education of the highest quality will be preserved and not
allowed to deteriorate.
R '
City of Dsnton City Council Minutes
August 19, 1986
Page Twenty one
BRCTIONIII
That the Cityy Secretary is hereby directed to forward
a copy of this resolution to the Governor of the State of
Texas, the Lieutenant Governor of the State of Texas, the
Speaker of the House of the State of ttxa8f and the Select
Committee on Higher Education of the State of Texas.
• SECTION III.
That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of August, 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SURSTARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS
9Ys
Alexander motion, Hopkins second to adopt the resolution. On
roll call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins *aye,*
Alford "aye,' Riddlesperger *Aye,* Chew "aye," and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
13. There was no official action on executive Efession
items of legal matters, real estate, personnel or board
appointments.
14. The Council reconvened in the Executive Session to
discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board
appointments. No official action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting wrs adjourned.
gay SEephena, Mayor
Jennifer mr e, Deputy
City Secretary
0384e
a-
ya''~.;t m r-r: w#"+'T~!. zr't}.s a-....n r.pr,; s5 rt ,.rrhTt S~^ rga.i °r~z
City Council Minutes
August 260 1986
The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at 4:o0 p.m. in
the City Manager's Conference Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephena; Mayor Pro Tote Alfordt Council Members
Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger
ABSENTt None
1. The Council considered a review and continuation of the
selection process for the Municipal Judge.
This item was taken under the Executive Session.
2. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
personnel/board appointments. No official action was taken.
The Council convened into the special Called Meetingat 600 p.m. in
the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building.
PRESENTS Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro UP Alford; Council Members
Alexander, Chow, Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger
City Manager and City Attorney
ASSENT: None
1. The Council held a review and tentative resolution of major
policy issues of the 1986-87 annual program of services.
The council then convened into the Special Called Meeting at 7:00
p.m, in the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tom Alford; Council Members
Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENT: None
1. The Council hold a public hearing on the proposed tax
increase and approval of a date for the tax rate vote.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Jesse Coffey stated that he was against any tax increase. Mr.
Coffey then presented some figures involving the growth of Denton.
These figures were obtained from the City of Denton Finance
Department and also from General Telephone. In 1980 there were
26,435 connections for the phone company; in 1985 there were 34,725
which was an increase of 311. These numbers did include commercial
telephone accounts and did not necessarily refltact the number of
residential telephone users. North Central Texas Council of
Governments information showed the population on Denton in 1980 to
be 48,218; the population in 1985 was 550022 which was an increase
of 141. City of Denton information showed the population in 1980 to
be 48,063; based on land use projections, the population in 1985 was
60,000 which was an increase of 251. There were an estimated 17,000
electrical connections in 1980 and 25,000 in 1985 for a 471
increase; 140500 water connections in 1980 and 16,500 in 1985 or a
141 increase. Based upon these figures, a 201 increase in
population would be approximately correct. Mr. Coffey stated that
he owned an apartment complex and there had been a 761 increase in
city taxes on those apartments over a five year period, The
electrical bill at the apartments has increased 1001 with a 121
increase in usage, the water/sewer bill had increased 146% with a
.31 in usage. rf the City owned the utilities and if the utilities
were to support City operations with no tax increase, it was not
working. County taxes had increased 831 and the school taxes had
increased 571 during the same prrriod of time. The number of city
employees had increased by 251 and the amount of total salaries had
e~*~, `k~" -,~~"e~~`#,~.'~R mb ,;,3.,, +:r.9e: r n ,.rF. N, :2ca5R P.. + Zf~
City of Denton city Caunell' minutes
meeting of August 26, 1986
Page Two
increased 908, The City budget in 1980 was $40,775,605; the
proposed budget for 1966-67 was $110,078,332 which was a 1708
Increase, This was a tremendous increase, The Federal, stats,
County, School District and City were all talking about raising
taxes, Mr, Coffey concludes by asking the Council to please put a
cap on taxes] the increase in population did not justify an increase
in taxes.
Mayor Stephens stated that the Council wet not looking at the
$110000,000 budget but rather the General Fund of the City. The
utilities were governed by rates,
Mr. Floyd Martin stated that he was retired and had paid taxes to
the city for 38 years and felt he would be "ripped off this year.'
The Tax Appraisal District had raised the evaluation on his house by
381 and on his property by 608, Now the City was talking about
raising his taxes 54%. During the 38 years he had lived in Denton
he had asked the City to do two things; when his street was repaved,
the curb and sidewalk in front of hi!, home had been torn up and he
has asked for it to be repsired. Last year he had tried to get the
City to abate a weed problem on a lot.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell responded to Mr. Martin by reported that
the City did not have anything to do with the assessment of property
values. The council was considering keeping the current tax rate of
591. This tax rate, coupled with the reassessment completed by the
Tax Appraisal District, would result in an average increase in City
of Denton taxes of approximately 101.
Mr, E. N. Craven spoke stating that he had lived in Denton since
1964 and had checked the tax rates prior to relocating. The first
year his property was taxed as a lot; the second year it was taxed
as a residence valued at 068,814. This year, after the reappraisal,
the value was set at $84,903. The citizens and elected official had
to understanding that this could not continue to go up. Mr. Craven
concluded by asking the Council to do their utmost to hold down the
taxes. Retired and middle r!.aes residents could not continue to pay
taxes which increased by 101 each year.
Mr. M. Co Burch spoke stating that he felt the tax board should look
at the assessments. Regarding annexations, real estate brokers
asked people if they wanted to buy property and would then get the
property annexed and zoned. If the property did not develop, the
City should collect back taxes on the higher zoning. Regarding
franchise taxes, Mr. Burch stated that he would hate to be the
victim of double taxation.
Mr. Jesse Coffey directed his comments to the City Attorney asking
If the proposed increase in revenue would exceed the legal limit
which would cause a roll-back election.
Debra brayovitch, City Attorney, responded that it vis her
understanding that it did.
Coffey asked if this would be posted in the paper with time limits,
given the amounts and how much it exceeded the limits; would this
become public notice?
Drayovitch responded that all of the requirements for the property
tax code would be met. After this meeting, there would be a notice
stating that the City Council had conducted a public hearing on a
proposal to increase the property taxes by the percentage of the
increase over the effective tax rate.
Coffey requested a letter from the City Attorney outlining the City
council's action and the amount by which the tax exceeded the legal
limit if a public notice was not required by law.
_'k4
T`r, Y,FY '#fy'j
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of August 26, 1966
Page Three
Drayovitch asked if Mr. Coffey meant the effective tax rate.
Coffey responded yesj at what poirlt would a roll back election is
called.
Drayovitch responded chat it was at; the City was at 10,11,
Coffey asked if the City of Denton, as owner of the utility system,
had to file their rates with the Pub1Ao Utility Commission and have
them approved.
Drayovitch responded no.
Coffey asked if there was any remedy under law for citizens to
protest 1001 and 146% utility increases over a period of five years.
Drayovitch suggested Mr, Coffey contact an attorney because the only
remedy she knew of was to go to court. Thor* were certain instances
wherein the Jurisdiction of the Public Utility Commixeion could be
invoked, she did not believe rate setting was included.
City Msnager Llovd Harrell reported that the proposed City budget
was very conservaLive. Thera were problems on the revenue side due
to lower sales tax revenues, lose of revenue sharingg and a decrease
in building permits. There was an expected shortfall of *11,000tooo
in the General Fund. Regarding the comments regarding the Increase
in the number of City employees, the percentage increase was less
than the increase in population Denton had experienced. Regarding
salaries, the City of Denton was still below the market average of
other cities,
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that the state set standards for
City fire and police personnel bat did not furnish any funds to help
meet those standards,
Council Member McAdams stated that even in Dallas, with a large
industrial base, was experiencing major budget problems.
Council Member Alexander stated that there was a close relationship
between the cuts in federal funds being returned to the local level
and the increases in local, state and school taxes.
Council Member Ridd.lesperger stated that the Human Resources
Committee had been forced to recommended increases in City of Denton
funds to offset moneys not being received from the federal and state
sources.
Council Member Hopkins expressed her appreciation to those attending
':he public hearing and giving input,
Council Member Chew stated that the proposed budget was the beat
prepared and most conservative one he, had seen in his five, and one-
half years on the City Council. The funding responsibility had been
past down from the federal to the local level. The City was trying
to provide services and the name quality of life to its citizens but
with less dollars, The Council would consider both the 571 and $91
tax rate during this budget process, Taxes would be reduced when
the industrial tax base wan broadened.
Mayor Stephens stated that the council Members were also taxpayers
and as such, would scrutinize the expenditures of the City. During
budget time, people had a variety of interests (parks, recreation
programs for youth, the Senior Center, etc.) for which they sought
continued or increased funds, Quality economic development was
needed to assure the continuation of the quality of life which
Dentonites had come to expect.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
9
1
' ~ {y T W F4.~ F _.i ^zgdlGesg' ' JFr_~ ~ 77-ATF fm7.F Tt ~T.'e~'3,.('^AV3 fPg},f 'tt 4 £ X is v+f ~t~ Tf
l
J
r City Of 006ton city council minutes
meeting of August 260 1986
Page lour
Alexander motion, Chew Second to take the tax rate vote on September
g, 1886, at 7300 p,m, in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building, Notion carried unanimously,
2. The Council reconvened Into the Executive Session to
discuss legal matter, real estate, porsonnel/board appointments, No
official action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting was adipurned.
RAY STEPHSNOt NAM
ZHARLOTTE ,
1662a ,
,
,k sp` Yea-'~° S :i'^1" s Z*S`d aTr?~sa~, '9r_ t.' .r +a~^;t_`$q.A'a a T,: r * ,4t ,7- s7 Y-._ ,rn a+
• NOTICE OF PUBLIC MAKING
ON TAX 1NCRBA35
The CITY OF DENTON will hold a public hearing on a
proposal to increase total tax revenues from roperties
on the tax roll in 1985 by 10.11. Your individual
taxes may increase at a `rester or lesser rate or even
decrease, depending on the change In the taxalle value
of your property in relation to the change in taxable
value of all other property.
The public hearing will be hold on August 260 1986
at 7:00 P.M. at the City of Denton Council Chambers,
215 E. McKinney Street.
FOR the proposals
AGAINST the Nroposal:
AASBNT and not voting:
The following is the proposed distribution of funds
provided from the $,59/$100 valuation:
Maintenance and Operations $6,4370000
General Fund*
Payment on Principal and Interest
for debt of the City 307760000
Additional Amount for Capital
Improvements or payment on
debt service for capital projects 205.000
TOTAL COLLECTIONS $1U.418.000
*Includes expenditures for Police, Fire, Municipal Court,
Genera? Government, etc.
1
s
y
1
y-~'~F*w:?R.S.•,+M 'k, n. T;r, r... n a"4.'IC1S'R,'$:F
CITY or DBM i 51TY CQVUSIL NIMUTaS
Sept*Aber 2, 1936
the Council Convened into the work session at 5.30 p.m. in the
City Manager's Conference Room in the Municipal Building.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephensl Mayor Pro Tom Alfordi Council
Members Alexander, Chew Hopkins, McAdams, and
Riddlesperger
ABSENT: None
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to
discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel/board
appointments, No official action was taken,
The Council convened into the Regular Netting at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building,
PRESENT: Mayor Stephonal Mayor Pro Tom Alfordt Council
Members Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams, and
Riddlesperger
ABSENT: None
Agenda item 12 was moved forward in the agenda order,
2. The Council received the presentation of awards for
beautification effort to the City.
Bob Ticknor, Superintendent of Parks, presented the awards.
The winner in the residential category was Ann and John Garling
and the commercial category winner was Ms, Gloria Burck for San
Jacinto Plaza.
Mayor Stephens presented the award to the Garlings.
Mrs, Garling stated that it was a great honor to receive the
award. She wanted to thank America for giving them the
opportunity to buy just a small piece of this great country.
Mayor Stephens presented the award to Ms. Burck.
Me, Burck expressed her gratitude and stated that it was a team
effort.
The council then returned to the regular agenda order.
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Special Called Meeting of June 19, 1986 and the Special Called
Meeting of June 26, 1986.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to approve the minutes as
presented, Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Stephens presented the rules for public hearings.
3. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing on the proposed
1986-87 Annual Program of Services.
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Greg Taylor addressed the Council. He was concerned about the
firefighters wages and referred to the general pay plan for the
City of Denton. He stated that only the firefighters (Civil
Service employees) did not have step raises. A program was
submitted by the Fire Department to include step raises for the
i
Y _ a r~rr +~[3; ~.r.;r~' .g, H .,y7.',*~,F . ,i sr'nn •"Sc,'~ .t T ,b 31.n •r.F' .^a : +s+' s 3. ^,5:
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Septkaber I, 1984
Page Two
firefighters but it was not accepted. He asked the Council to
look at the inequality of the pay plan, Sven the civilian
employees of the fire department received step raises. He
asked to try and equalize the pay plan for the firefighters.
Baxter Ireland addressed the council. He stated that the City
needs to out back--that the budget could be smaller. With the
new residents in town, the tax base is larger, Hold the line
on the budget--don't increase it.
Dan Wall addressed the Council. He stated that even though
things seemed tight, he had found some inconsistencies in the
City, for examplo, when he wont through the North Lakes park,
he found the lights were on the driving range and the tennis
courts and no one was there. He felt that if mono? IN tight,
there had to be a better way to spend money than to save the
lights on with no one there, if the City was tr inq to show
the citizens that they are trying to 'reep the budW in line,
the citizens would not be so opposed to paying taxes.
Karen Conner, a member of the Human Resources Committee, spoke
to the Council. She referred to the Ljot that in the current
budget recommendation the money for HUA11`1 Resources Committee
agencies be kept at last year's level. She stated that the
State and Federal governments had already made cuts and had
flans to make more. The Federal and State governments ex ected
Ehe local governments to assist more in the support of social
service agencies. She continued that the moderate increases
that they were making for would in no way make up for the cuts
already felt by the State and Federal governments, If the
funding were to remain at last year's level, grant money would
be in jeopardy. In addition to the Federal and State outs, the
population of Denton had been growing rapidly and that increase
was causing a greater demand for services,
Council Member Riddlesperger complemented Ma. Conner for her
work on the Human Resources Committee.
Peggy Keller, R,S,V,P „ addressed the Council. She stated that
the agency was funded by a variety of sources but that most of
those sources had already made ruts in their funding. She
stated that the local government was making cuts to local
people not just faceless people, If the services were cut, the
fat was not being cut from the programs, the necessities were.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he felt strongly for
R.S.V.P. IL was not asking help for itself, it we.a asking help
for others.
Council Member McAdams felt that not all the programs hac+ been
given equal time. She mertioned Nandi-Hop/Span. If a cut was
made there, a possible cut was being made for people to obtain
jobs. She compared the benefits for the young in the day care
centers with the benefits for the old in SPAN, R.S.V.P., etc.
Barbara Lewis, asked the Council to remember the priorities
that every one of these agencies need. That cuts could effect
the quality of services of not only the day care centers but
the other agencies as well.
Barbara Naplin addressed the Council regarding cuts in the
budget to the Human Resources Committee agencies. She stated
that the state funding depended on sustained local funding.
i
al,
, , _ -'vt
:.X fP`R,4~` , .•gn> e i .'F9 sf t re -<F: z z: "I
City Of Denton City Council Minutes
September 2, 1994
Page Three
Roberta Donsbach of SPAN addressed the Council. She stated
that the 'message they are now getting from the Federal `
Government is that the local communities are wanting to support
these he agencies. oih life that s is t fiery gshe would look
at y good. She would
rather have to pay more taxes than not have the services
available.
Counr,il Member Chf- defended SPAN Saying that tt was a top
quality operation an] really added a lot to the quality of life
in Denton.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that both facets of serving
the young and old were important. He complioented the Human
Resourere Committee on the wonderful job they had done.
Council Member Alexander stated that the comments presented had
made an impression on him and that he would take them into
consideration when finalizing the budget.
Council Member McAdams Stated that the SPAN program had been
viewed as 1 model to other communities and states in that they
provided the quality of services that they do wits `he amount
of funding they received.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Council Member Hopkins stated that tier silence has not meant
that She was not taking into account all that wrS being said.
She appreciated the concerned citizens coming to speak to tie
Council.
Council Member Alford stated that the Council did know what was
toktng place and that the next two weeks would bu filled with
lots of thought and concern.
Mayor Stephens stated that the Council appreciated the
presentations that everyone had made and that the council would
take comments and suggestions into account when finalizing the
budget.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager addressed the Council regarding
some ht plights on the budget. He stated that this budget
would a~low the City to tread water, with no giant steps
forward in improving the quality of life in the City out also
not slip back. The only new positions for staff would be
.Avenue producing positions or positions that were mane4ted by
previous legislation. The City was asking its employees to do
more with not as great of pay. It would be a challenge for
dr;artments to operate this next year with all the items that
hGve been squeezed down to the minimum, He stated that
revenues were a problem for the city and that sales tax growth
had had a major drop-off as had building activities. He
referred to the problem of the firefightesa pay plan. He
stated that they were trying to fund a comprehensive look at
the entire pay plan but there wasn't the money to do that,
Financial realities dictate thct the City wait another year or
two to du this cornrehensive look at the pay plan. He agreed
that something needed to be looked at in regards to the
lighting remaining on at the recreation facilities when no one
was there. He stated that procedures wound be changed if
needed to correct this problem, In the social service areas,
Harrell stated that while it was important to fund those
agencieki, the budget was tight and had to cut some in those
areas to be equitable for all departments. Harrell concluded
by saying that the budget was vhry wall prepared and that much
thought h td gone into it.
city of Denton city council minutes
September 21 1986
Page your
S. The Council held a public hearing concerning the
proposed annexation of appeoxi" tely 23.642O'
3,6420 aaces of land
being part of the Gideon Walker Survey, Apstrac• 13301' and
beginning adjacent and north of Edwards Road approxi-1~ely .5
mile east of Mayhill Road and .5 mile west of Swisher Road.
(A-41)
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
David Ellison, Senior Planner# stated that this was a voluntary
petition acid was the second public hearing. It was a
reasonable request. The institution of annexation proceedings
would be at the special called meeting of September 23, 1986,
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
4. Consent Agenda
McAdams motion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agendas
A. Bids and Purchase Orderar
1, Bid 09632 - Underground duct bank system
2. Bid 19644 - CIP utilities Airport Road
sanitary sewer
S. Plate and Replate:
1. Approval of preliminary and "inal replat of
the H. V. Hennon Subdivision, Lots 2 and 3.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
2. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Wooded Acres Subdivision, Lot 21 Block 4.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recoy.:mends approval.)
C. Change Orders:
1. Consider approval of Change order 01 to Bid
# 9609, Purchase Order 0 73633 for the
Stuart-Seline Project,
5. OrJincnces
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements,
The following ordinance was presented:
N0. 86-171
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTIt:9 COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING
FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR
IMPROVEMENTS PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
i
c !s r ,,4.~C§s{.Fs'.t aH^~ sis?S r3 "k'i"`3[!$s xa5 i'.'•s- A.~ *r .;._'t t' t r +',r'Y...'r.'i; .;.+.P:w .r::;..E'Ta.'S'T T° ..f uF' i~ r. 5 iF;; c/:t ",..k.
City of Denton City Council minutes
September 21 1966
page Pit,e
Riddlespetger motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. on
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
B, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a request for a change in zoning from the single
family (SP-10) district to the planned development (PD)
classification on an 16.24 acre tract located at the northeast
corner of U,S. Highway 360 and Old North Road. The property is
further descriLed as a tract in the Casueli Carter Survey,
Abstract 275, and the R. B. Longbottom Survey, Abstract 775.
(Z-1814)
The following ordinance was presentedr
NO. 86-172
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
DENTON$ TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND A.S. SAID MAP
APPLIES To 18.24 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380 AND OLD NORTH
ROAD, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN# TO
PROVIDE FOUR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM
SINGLE-FAMILY "SP-10" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD' DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION: PROVIDING FOR
APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICT: AND
PROVIDING felt AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Alexander motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. on roll
call vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'ays,' Hopkins 'a,,e,'
Alford 'aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew 'aye," and M.agor
Stephens "aye," Motion carried unanimously.
C. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a request for a agricultural (A) district to theng pin zoning from the
planned development (PD)
classification and approval of a concept plan on a 412.12 acre
tract in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract 1286. The property
is located on the west side of PM 2164 approximately 1,850 feet
north of Hercules Lane. (7,-1815)
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-173
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 412.12 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF F,M. 2164, APPROXIMATELY 1,850 FEET NORTH OF
HERCULES LANE, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN: To PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT "PD' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIONATIONI PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN
FOR SAID DISTRICT: AND PAt)VIDING FOR All EFFECTIVE DATE.
„3 r + ^f. ~..a'gt„'±RF*F+r• i€ -c' r£.. t. . r -,.py <•r
city of Denton city Council Minutes
September It 1936
Page' six
Alford motion, chow second to adopt the ordinance. on roll
call vote, McAdams "ays,• Alexander *aye,* Hopkins "aye,"
Alford mays," Riddlssperger "aye," Chew 'aye," and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
D. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
abandoning and vacating certain utility easements.
Bob Nelson, Director of (Itiiities, stated that this was a
utility easement which Brazos used as a transmission line for a
new power plant, This was a quit claim and was giving the
property back to the residents in the area.
The following ordinance was presenteds
No. 86-174
AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY
EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED HEREINI AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Riddleapsrger motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander may*.* Hopkins "aye,'
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew •aye,• and Mayor
Stephens "aye," Motion carried unanimously,
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending water rate schedule W3 ("Water Sale for Resale to
C.OVernmental Agencies, Division, or Subdivisions'), as adopted
by ordinance No. 84-137, to provide for a revised cats for such
sales made by contract after June 10 1986.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities stated that the rate needed
to be applied to the ws,ter sale. The rate consultants had
looked at the rate and recommended it along with the Public
Utility Boaro,
Mayor Stephens asked if this was treated water.
Nelson replied yes that it was treated water that Came from
Dallas.
Stephens asked if this would affect the water treatment p14nt
as the Cit} had more of these types of stiles.
Nelson replied yes and that this contract with Lake Cities was
an interim contract which would allow Lake Cities to buy a
piece of the new water plant and be a joint owner with the City.
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 86-175
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING WATER RATE SCHEDULE W3 k'WATER
SALE FOR RESALE TO GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, DIVISIONS OR
SUBDIVISIONS'), AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 84-137, TO
PROVIDE FOR A REVISED RATE FOR SUCH SALES MADE BY
CONTRACT AFTER JUNE 1, 19861 AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DAME.
Hopkins motion, OcAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, NcAe,tms "aysjO Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye,'
Alford "aye,' %iddlespergar "aye," Chew "aye," and mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
r t
r~,a,~{tea, .,...~";u••~cq~~~ `~:;.t`s n-~, 3~+ zrF c.~tu ,~•f ,3"..~,,,. h .--tQ.-'~'..x"4~' ..tz _-'s-,~:
City of Denton city council Minutes
Sept" ber 20 1900
Page Seven
F. The Council considered adoption of An ordinance
approving a contract for the City's Participation in the cost
of installing an oversised mower main.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that the school
district was proposing an elementary school on Hickory Creek
Road. They needed to extend a sewer line which required only a
10" line but the regional area required a 15" line. The Public
Utility Board recommended approval.
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 86-176
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF INSTALLING AN OVERSIZE
SEWER MAINi AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR To EXECUTE THE
CONTRACTi APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE of FUNDS
THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Hopkins aecond to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor
Stephens "Aye." Motion carried unanimously.
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
providing for one-way traffic west bound on Highland Street
from Welch Street to Avenue A and on Highland Street from
Avenue D to Avenue E,
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager stated that At the August
meeting the Traffic Safety Support Commission reviewed the
request from North Texas. The present traffic flow was
confusing and the Traffic Commission was recommending that
Highland become one-way.
Mayor Stephens asked if the Commission was aware of the impact
that was going to be made at the corner of Welch and Avenue A
if a traffic light was not installed at the same time as the
change in traffic flow.
Svehla replied that staff looked at the fact that if Highland
was one-way going west that one of the conflicting movements
was eliminated.
Stephens motion, Chew second to table the ordinance for further
study. Motion failed on o 5-2 vote with Alexander, Alford,
Riddlesperger, Hopkins, and McAdams casting the "nay" votes.
Mayor Stephens stated that he felt an overall study should be
done before any action was taken and to look at the overall
area before changes were made.
Svehla stated that there was a signal at Eagle and Welch being
planned. The commission looked at the directions that occur in
that area. There were conflicting movements in the area which
could be atreaMlined by making the street all. one-way or all
two-way. NTSU had asked to make the street all one-way. A
traffic count sad not been done but it probably would not meet
the standards required for a Signal.
Council Member Alexander stated thi, he would like to go on the
recommendatfon of the Traffic Safety Committee. They had
reviewed it and the Council should defer to their judgment.
i
;f
~ s n,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
septenbex 21 IM
Page sight
Hopkins notion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance
with the Amendment that it not be inyieiaented until the new
signal at welch and Eagle was operative. Hopkins amended the
motion directing the City Attorney to anlnd the ordinance as
stated above, on roll call vote, MoAdans •aye,• Alexander
'aye,' Hopkins *aye," Alford 'aye,• Riddleaperger. •a~e,' Chew
'nay,' and Mayor Stephens 'nay." Notion carried with s 5-2
vote,
H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
prohibiting the parking of vehicles on the west side of Austin
street from its intersection with Pecan Street to its
intersection with East Oak Street,
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, stated that this request
was from Mr, Joe Hopkins who owned the property adjacent to the
request. This ordinance would remove the parking along the
side of his building where the underground parking garage was,
The Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended approval.
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 66-177
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON
THE WEST SIDE OF AUSTIN STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION
WITH PECAN STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH EAST OAK
STREETI PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS1 AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTSVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins 'aye,"
Alford "eye," Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew ■aye,' and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
6. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
appointing the Special Citizens Advisory committee on capital
improvements.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this resolution would
formally appoint the Special. Citizens Advisory committee on
capital improvements. There were approximately 51 individuals
on the committee which would take the capital improvements
program as submitted by the Planning and Zoning Commission,
review the document, make suggestions to the council for
modifications,
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
SECTION I.
In accordance with the Resolution of the pity Council
adopted on the 15th day of July, 1986, the follrvring
individuals are hereby appointed to serve as members of the
Special Citizens Advisory Committee on capital improvements:
Karen Abernathy Elinor Hughes
Hugh Ayer Dave Krause
Geneva Berg Jo Luker
Homer Bly Da:.1a McDade
Bill Brady Jack Miller
i
I 71,111"f
city Of Denton city council minutes
September 20 1986
r page Nine
Darrell Bulls Allis Miller
Lucy Campbell Ralph Morrison
Mike Campbell Clovis Morrisoe, Jr.
Bill Claiborne Bettye Myers
Jski Craven Kathy Orr
Bob Crouch Lisa Patterson
Bill Crouch Fred Patterson
Frank Davila William P. Phillips
Roberta Donsbaeh Harold Reed, Jr.
George Edwards Larry Reynolds
John anlow Richard Salazar
Hazel Frederick Joe Short
Robbie Gober Chuck Smith
Bob Gorton Sue Smith
Halan Hailey Don Smith
Tom Harpool Denny Snider
John Harris Donna Tramm,41
Lloyd Hindman Ed Wolski
Joe Holland Donald Wright, President
Ann Houston A. E. Wyatt
John Hughes
SECTION II.
That it Shall be the charge of said Committee to make
recommendations to the City council on the manner of iag•lamenting
the City's five-1,ear Capital Improvements PlAn.
SECTION III,
W That this resolution shall become etfective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of September, 1986.
RA STEPHENSt MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
CHARLOTTE MN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
McAdams motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye,'
Alford "aye,' Riddlesperger "aye,' Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously,
7, The Council considered approval of sanitary sewer
service outside the City limits for Mr. Ray L. Eaker,
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that Mr. Baker lived
in the Forest Ridge area had requested sewer service. There
was a sewer line directly behind his property that c,r.ld easily
serve the property. The Public Utilities Board recommended
approval.
/ h
d
1.%u
.:5~~^..'°tr-n4T ~.i.` ~r r n rfisw. ^r~a'~` ✓i a.-~ 'n rf,i, c-c , t . s .a :.r
City of Denton city council Minot*$
September T, 1986
Page Ten
Chew motion, l;lexander to approve the sanitary sewer service
outside the City limits. Notion carried unanimously. '
6, The Council considered approval of sanitary sewer
service outside the City limits for Me, Norma Harrison.
Bob Nelson, Director of; Utilities, stated that this was the
exact situation as Mr. Baker, in fact, Me. Harrison was a
neighbor of Mr. Baker's. The Public Utilities Board
reoommanded approval.
Riddlesporger motion, Alexander second to approve the sanitary
sewer service outside the City limits. Motion carried
unanimously.
9, The Council received an update on Flow Memorial
Hospital.
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that shl. was pleased to
report that the attorneys met last Wednesday for approximately
1 hours and reached a tentative solution so that the issue of
the deed could be resolved, It was unfortun❑te that some
statements had been made that the attorneys had stalled the
agreements and that it had been deliberate. She felt that each
attorney was doing his best to represent the interest of his
respective clients. With respect to the deed, the City was of
a different interpretation then the hospital's attorneys, A
compromise had been reached and it involved the fact that the
City and the County wcald have the option to purchase the
hospital property in the event that the hospital ceased to be
operated as a non-profit corporation provi4:ng hospital
services. The option to purchase would take place with nominal
consideration, 1.e. $160 but would be only able to be exercised
after the city and county had given notice to the hospital
corporation that they were not in compliance with the
conditions of the deed. When the negotiations took place,
everyone aareed to present to his :espective clients, deadlines
within wisioh the hospital would have the right to recommence as
a non-profit corporation and/or provide hospital services as
the case might be, The City felt that a lengthy period in
which the hospital would have an opportunity to curer the
defaults, would not be necessary bacause you either nad
non-profit status or you had u letter from the IRS saying you
are not A 501C3 corporation. Moreover, if hospital services
were being provided on the property by a physician, nurses, it
doesn't intail that every single unit or room be operational,
but that hospital services of some sort are being provided on
the hospital property. For those reasons, the City did not
feel that a long notice period was necessary, .f was her
understanding from her attorneys, that the hospitax attorneys
had asked that as long as the huspitnl corporation was using
due diligence to cure the alleged default, the City and the
County could not exercise it's option. This was something the
Council had to decide on. It was not really a legal issue, it
was a question of how the council would like to proceed on this
matter. It should be pointed out that even with resolution of
this matter, there would still remain a nui.ber of steps
necessary that must be taken prior to the closing of this
property. The only actions that remain necessary on the part
of the City and the County are the appointment of the Hoard of
Advisors and two other steps which would takb place right at
closing (a list of all outstanding malpractice claims and a
determination of whether or not to use Hill-Burton eligibility
standards).
i
' a{ ~i..r7
77. .i ,x+~r1777"'777 City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 2, 1486
Pro" Sloven
Council Member Alexander asked it the difference in what the
City had anticipated would be the case and what the hospital
attorneys had reaommonded, was that a due diligence clause was
added to the agreement, was that the only real difference
which would have the effect of a longer of period of time, in
all probability, before the City and the County could make the
repurchase.
Drayovitch replied yes. She went on to explain that it went a
little bit further than that, The City also wanted to insert a
due diligence clause, but the City felt that there should be a
time limi" un that of perhaps six months to a year. The City
felt that with.n a year some sort of nospital services Could be
offered even if the entire facility were destroyed. The result
of the open-ended clause as opposed to having a fixed limit,
like six months or a year, was that at any point if the City
wished to exercise the option and the hospital was not in
agreement, we would be forced into litigation which would
possibly go on for a goon long while.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the hospital was not in /
agreement with the time limit.
Drayovitch responded that the hospital Colt that so long as
they could 8rover that they were using due diligence, that the
option would not be triggered,
Council Member McAdams stated that in effect the hospital could
be operating with the IRS having said it was no longer a
non-profit corporation but tb.y could continue to operate and
the City in effect would nos "eve any option for however long
the hospital said they were sing diligent in trying to get
that opinion reversed,
Drayovitch stated that that was exactly sight.
Council Member Alexander stated that this mechanism would also
require the City and County to come agreement to &ctually file
the suit.
Drayovitch stated yes if the City were denied the option to
repurchase, This still did provide for 4 very strong remedy in
the case of non-compliance or a violation of the covenants. It
was the strongest remedy she thought the City could have,
Council Member Alexander stated that the primary argument for
the uue diligence clause without time restrictions on the part
of the attorneys for the hospital was that that kind of
provision would enhance the ability of the hospital to provide
financing.
Drayovitch stated yes for the option to repurchase as opposed
to an automaric reverter.
Alexander asked wily the hospital was unwilling to put on a
reasonable time limit. What was the logic and argument behind
their side of that position.
Drayovitch replied that she felt that if she were o.. the other
side, she would fight for the very same thing. She would
negotiate to give as much flexibility and as much protection as
she could.
Council Member McAdams was troubled by the face that if the
intention of the three groups was to salvage the hospital and
do this as quickly as possible, why was it being fought out as
s
yaw.iN L7 tys ,"`y +-..fi `5' 7Li t IY .~`r'z ,J. 1. _t. '}n
7«
r `s
{ _ 7
City of Denton city council Minutes
September 20 1966
Page 'helve
though we were toes and demanding every, possible protection in
terms of them having as long as possile to hang on to that
rather than having it revert it it Ceases to operate as a
non-profit institution.
Drayovitch stated that she had articulated that same thought at
Wednesday's meeting. Going back to the very first charge of
the Blue Ribbon Committee, the thread throughout all of these
past months, was the rsaaon why the City and County were not
selling to a for-profit institution was beonuse of this group's
pledgqe to continue to operate a non-profit hospital providing
publia health care services.
Council Member McAdams stated that it was very clear to her
that neither the City not the County wanted to operate the
hospital and that was why they were trying to pass it on to
someone else. Why would the hospital corporation think that
the City would want to take it back.
Drayovitch stated that that was another reason why the option
to repurchase was favorable to the City because it need not, if
the City or county did not wish to exercise it, they were not
bound to it. But at the some time, it something were to happen
and the continuation of those services were in jeopardy, if the
governments) bodies decided that they wished to continue, they
would have the opportunity.
Council member Riddlesperger stated that he felt this was an
examQle of how the lawyers had been arguing for three or tour
months. Lay people cannot understand why these three set of
lawyers can't get together in a concept that the Council and
the Commissioners Court had agreed to the basic concept, why
they can't get together and do it. The city was allowing the
hospital to bleed to death while arguing over incidental
matters. The agreement was simple enough that they would
return the hospital, they would give us a chance to buy it back
if it did not operate as a hospital. He felt that was all that
was necessary to put in there. He would recommend that the
City sncept the concept presented here and go ahead and fix the
cor'ract.
Cu,uncil Member McAdams stated that sho had a real concern that
the County and the City were in agreement on the issue that
they don't really want the hospital back. However, If it would
cases to be a public-type hospital, the City wanted to make
certain that they could get that facility back it they desired
and somehow provide that service to the people in the County.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he felt at times that
the lawyers were trying to kill Plow. The doctors and the
people that the City were depending upon were saying that the
V.ty was not doing its job.
Council Member Hopkins asked the Attorney if she felt the
hospital would accept any type of time frame or were they
again.vt any time limit.
urayovitch stated that it was to be open ended.
Hopkins asked if Drayovitch felt the City was protected enough
in this instance since it could possibly go to litigation.
Drayovitch replied that it was a more significant protection
then what was originally proposed.
i
k, i 7
C!.ty of o" ton City council Minutes
1epkepber 20 1916
page thirteen
Council Member Alexander asked the attorney if the Council
needed soxw type of motion or action to give hor direction.
Mayor Stephens replied that the Council could not give her
motions as the item w!9 just to receive an update.
Drsyov,ttah asked if the council was willing to accept the
proposal of Mr. Butterfield on behalf of the hospital.
Council Members McAdams and chow replied no.
The Council considered the agenda addendum before them,
Agenda Addendum
It The Coj.ncil considered adoption of an ordinance
authorising the purchase of ,3231 acres of real property for
street improvement purposes, said property being situated in
the City ^f Denton, Texas and being part of the n. McCracken
Survey, Abstract No. 817.
The following ordinance was presentedr
NO. 86-176
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF AN EASEMENT
FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS! SAID EASEMENT CONTAINING
APPROXIMATELY .3231 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE S.
ACCRACKRN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 817, IN THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS AS IS MORS EARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREiNJ AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE; DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "eye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger 'aye," Chew 'aye,' and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
The council then returned to the regular agenda order.
10. The Council received a report on miscellaneous matters
from the City Manager.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that the City task force
had been appointed to monitor the Health Department and how
that i.asue was progressing. The task force was attending a
briefing that evening being held by the Commissioners court,
11. New Business
No items of New Business were suggested bi Council
members for future agendas.
12. The Council convened into the Executive Session to
discuss legal matters,, ;eal estate, and personnel/board
appointments.
The Council reconvened into open session in the city Manager's
Conference Room, Municipal Building.
Debra Dr.ayovitch, City Attorney stated that she had been in
contact with one of the hospital's attorneys and had discussed
the open-ended part of the contract. she stated that he felt
that 6 months would be acceptable if open-ended with a total
deutruction. he was not speaking for &ny of the other lawyers
but only for himself.
i
r
City Of Denton city council winutea
Sspt"Ibsr 21 13ti
P490 trourt"n
It War the Consensus of opinion of the Council to move on this
agresmo0 and sss what Would develop,
With no ~urthsr items Of business, the mesting was adjourned.
M , MAYOR
JENNIFER IMRIE
DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY
02420
I
r
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 9e 1986
The council convened into the joint work session at 500 p,m. with
the Planning and Zoning Commisaion in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building.
PRESZNTJ Mayor 8tephonsr May Pro Tom Alfordl Council Members
Alexander, Chew$ Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger
Planning and Zoning Commission Members Holt, Cannon,
Brook, Claiborne, Cole and Escue
ASSENTI None
1, The council held a discussion of intensity policies in
eastern Denton between U.S, 380 and I-35,
Cecile' Carson, Urban Planner, reported that the staff had been
looking at land use planning in the five quadrants of the City for
growth, current trends, haw this growth and trends would affect
Denton in the future and how to change the policy to best suit
Denton. She gave some projected growth figures for Denton in the
areas of population, housing and transportation. It was staff's
recommendation that three moderate intensity nodes be developed
along the following areast U.S. 3800 McKinney Street, and I-35,
The petitioner had submitted a land use re uest for five moderate
intensity nodes in this area. Staff had objections in that as the
fivq nodes developed they would enlarge, join and soon overlap.
There ware problems associated with the five nodes in that thece
might be a shift in growth to the eastern quadrant with less
interest to develop in other areas of the City, The CiLy would
still be responsible for those services in other parts of the City.
From the utility standpoint, the City would also be forced to build
in that section of town because of the cost for the oversizing.
There would also be a need to increase the sewer plant, Streets
would also be a consideration as collector streets would receive
more traffic and would need upgrading,
Commissioner Claiborne asked what kind of fiscal impact the five
nodes would have on the CIP program.
Carson replied that there would be an obvious shift in demand for
services by higher density/intensity areas but that the funds would
have to be balancea so that other areas would not be neglected.
Claiborne asked hew the average rate payer woulo be affected if
development and growth in this area were greater than other parts of
the City.
Carson replied that she did not know. She stated that projections
would have greater density in one location but that the population
growth would be for the whole City, Other arose would have less
population.
Council Member Alexander asked for a projected time frame f,.)r the
development.
Carson replied that no final plan had been submitted but that the
original development has a 20 year plan for total build-out,
i
prsrs-~T•er!~=,.,~---..,~, , . _ :its
ITT
City or Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of Bepteaber 9, 1986
Page 2
Claiborne asked Carson to describe the workings of the Land Use
Planning Committee.
Carson replied that they had had a aiap planning session mapping
growth for the City,
Claiborne asked about Pecan Creek drainage west of'Loop 288.
Carson re lied that th[are was A natural flow alonj the creek and
would need the flood area to remain so that the creek could flow
into that area, some additional building would be needed to
redirect/rechannel the water elsewhere to insure n> flooding,
Mayor Stephens asked if 1:he FSMA maps were accurate.
Carson replied that the actual maps may be accurate but that the
final development may change and thus change the maps,
Council Member Alexander askso if the developer was rteponsible for
the development of the drainage so as to be sufficient for present
needs and needs in the future.
Carson stated that the drainage was a very technical aspect which
reqquires a study on how the drainage would affect their development
any] how it would affect other developments,
Council Member McAdams stated that the basic system was the place to
start. It would not •.rork to go back and put the utilities in
later, The basic system had to be funded first.
Council Member Chew stated that he would recommend balanced growth
in all parts of the City.
Commissioner Claiborne recommended three nodes of growth, This
would distribute the fis&al impact on the City,
Mayor Stephens asked if there would be a commercial strip similar to
University Drive,
Claiborne replied that a five node system may creato another
University Drive.
Council Member Chew stated that Some commercial strips were
necessary for help with utility bills,
Council Member McAdams stated that nodes of commercial businesses
wouJ.d be fine but no strip of commercial businesses,
Commissioner Brock stated that the commercial development would not
be reduced but rather distributed throughout the area and not
concentrated in one area,
Consensus of the Council was to limit the area to three nodes of
development,
2. The Council hold a discussion of the first come - first
serve intensity allocation proceduro,
Steve Fanning stated that traditional district zoning system is
probable as much individual policies as anything, it had boon
written in 1919 with broad system categories, Currently staff was
trying to look at individual developdrs and specific individuals.
However, the system was written to do something difterent,
city of Denton city Council Minutes
Meeting of September 90 1966
Page 3
He offered the following ouqgestionat start with work sessions
before formal advertising, 11>ok at planning with allocations, if the
current intensity is already over standaros look at ways to
accommodate planning instead of getting hung up on numbers, and if
not over standards, do other types of planning.
Claiborne stated that now the first in with the most get the beat
and would recommend immediate discontinuation of this practice.
Mayor Stephens asked that if each individual case was looked at, how
would you keep from over building the area,
Claiborne replied that the Denton Development Guide policies would
have to be reinforced and to look more at specific planning areas,
Holt stated that first come - first serve could not be done away
with entirely. Eventually you would have to say no more intensity
is left for your proposed development but he did not have a specific
plan,
Council Men,ber Riddlesperger suggested that the developer be called
in to see what others in the area were going to do. He also
suggested a group meeting with the nevelopers in the area to see
what would be developed.
Holt suggested that perhaps the undeveloped owners could be notified
as to what was going to be built around them,
3. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel/board appointments. No
officiat action wav taken.
The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7t00 p.m, in the
Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENTi Mayor Stephensg Mayor Pro Tom Alfordt Council Members
Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger
ABIENTt None
11 Resolutions
A. The Council considered adoption of a resolution
allocating $42 on the tax rate to the General Debt Service Fund
only.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this resolution was a
written expression of the intent that the proceeds from the
additional $42 tax rate would be specifically earmarked ana placed
in the loneral Debt Ratiromerit Fund of the City and would not be
available for any kind of General operating Expenses. If some of
the issue were not approved by the voters or if the Council decided
at a later point to not go forward with any kind of bond issue
proposal, '.a proceeds from the levy would remain in the Debt
Retirement Fund and would be available for the following year to be
able to reduce the debt retirement levy.
Council Member Riddlesperger complimented the Manager for the
excellent job he and his staff had done on preparing the budget.
i
City of Renton city council minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1986
Page
Council Member Chew stated that an excellent job had been done and
commanded the Manager and Mayor for the upcoming resolution,
Council Member Alexander stated that the resolution made very good
sense, He too complimented the Manager and staff for putting
together an excellent budget document,
The following resolution was presentedt
R E 6 0 L U T I Q N
WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has moos its
recommendation for a five year Capital Improvement Plan to the city
councils and
WHEREAS, the city council has eetablished a Citizens
committee to review the proposed capital Improvement Plan together
with other proposed Capital improvements and make recommendations to
the Planning and Zoning commission and city council relative
theretol and
WHEREAS, a bond election and bond sale may be necessary to
provide funding for the Capital Improvements Programs
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONs
SECTION I.
That if a $0.59 tax rate (per one hundred dollar valuation)
is approved by ordinance of the City Council, $0,57 (per one hundred
dollar valuation) of said $0.59 would be necessary to provide
funding for the City's current 1986-87 maintenance and operation
budget and the existing debt service requirements of tlsanl year
1986-87.
SECTION II.
That the proceeds from the additional $U,02 tax rate (per
one hundred dollar valuation) will be placed in the City's General
Debt Service Retirement fund in order to halp defray the COOLS of
any additional debt service requirements needed to fund a Capital
Improvements Program,
SECTION 111.
That, in the event no program is recommended, or the voters
fail to approve the construction of the proposed capital
improvements, the proceeds from the additional $0.02 (per one
hundred dollar valuation) will remain in the General Dobt Service
Fund, and be available to pay future year debt service requirements
on existing outstanding debt, and allow reductions in the debt
service levy of f,ture years,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 9th day of September, .1986,
R STMENS, RAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1986
Page 5
ATTEST;
CITY OF DENTON# T29AS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORN4Y
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY ;
Chew motion, McAdams Second that the resolution be approved. On
roll Call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,'
Alford 'aye,' Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "eye,' and Mayor Stephens
'aye." Motion carried unanimously,
2, ordinanoes
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
setting the tax rate for fiscal year 1986-87.
The following ordinance was presentedt
NO, 86-179
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING THE AD VALOREM TAX OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE YEAR 1986, AT THE RATE OF $0.59 PER
$100.00 ASSESSED EVALUATION ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN
THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY ON JANUARY 11 1986, NOT
EXEMPT BY LAW) PROVIDING REVENUEb FOR PAYMENT OF CURRENT
MUNICIPAL EXPENSES, AND FOR INTEREST AND SINXING FUND ON
OUTSTANDING CITY OF DENTON BONDS; PROVIDING FOR LIMITED
EXEMPTIONS OF CERTAIN HUMESTEADSI PROVIDINO FOR ENFORCEMENT
OF COLLECTIONS) PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE) AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chow motion, McAdams second to awupt the ordinance, on roll call
vote McAdams "aya,' Alexander "aye,' Hopk;.ns "aye," Alford 'a~e,"
Ridd~esperger 'aye,' Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Mo Ion
carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan instituting annexation of approximately 132,64 acres of
land being part of the 0. Walker survey, Abstract 1330, and part of
the 4I. Durham Survey, Abstract 3000 and beginning at a point
approximately one mile south of FM 426 (East McKinney) and one and
one-half miles north of I-35E.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this was the institution
of annexation and the final action would be October 21, 1986,
The following ordinance was presented;
No. 86-
AN ORDINANCE 4NNEXINO A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS; B£INO ALL THAT LOT,
TRACI OR PARCEL of LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 132.64
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BLUING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE 0. WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1330 AND PART OF THE W, DURHAM SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 300, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS] CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS
AGRICULTURAL 'A" DISTRICT PROPERTY) AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
t
city of Denton city Council minutes
Meeting of September 9e 1966
page 6
McAdams Motions Chew Second to adopt the ordinance, on roll call
vote, McAdams "eye,w Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye,' Alford ways,"
Riddlesperger "aye,' Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens `aye.' motion
carried unanimously,
3. '@he Council considered authorizing the Mayor to establish a
Denton Bicentennial of the United States Constitution Committee.
Mayor Stephens stated that this would be part of a national
committee, The committee was just beginning and would last until
1989. He suggested that the chairman of the committee be
Dr, John Kincaid.
Alexander motion, Hopkins second to approve the authorization.
Motion carried unanimously.
4, The council received a report and held a discussion on the
reorganization proposal for the County Health Department.
Paulette owene-Holmes stated that clinical and environmental
services would have the same assessment. Health service fees had
been increased significantly. This had caused a lower per capita
rate resulting in lower assessment rates for all participating
municipalities, Contracts would be submitted by the 15th of the
month, The contract would be presented at the next meeting.
Council Member Chew commended the task force for its outstanding job,
Council Member McAdams expressed home concern that while the amount
that the city was paying was going down, someone else was paying for
the difference. The intent was to provide basic services to
everyone and perhaps now everyone may not be able to pay for those
services, she expresses concern that perhaps people would not get
their children immunized now because of the increased costs to them.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the City's 151,000 figure
was probably an interim atop and! may inuresso in the future,
The Council convened into the work Session in the Civil Defense Room
of the Municipal Building
1. The Council received a report on the 1986 City Council
goals and priorities,
The first report received was on Flow Hospital.
Debra Drayuvitch, City Attorney, stated that Choy were following the
ach,:dule as planned and would report back when the dates came up.
She stated that the list on Flow showed the outstanding steps that
still remained, The deed was being prepared and will be sent out on
Wednesday the 10th. The hospital attorneys have the option to look
at it and make any changes they felt were necessary, As soon as
this is done, the other steps would be started. She stated that an
approximate completion date would be in a maximum of 8 weeks,
council Member Riddlesperger stated that the delays were very
painful to Flow and pressed to get all the steps done as quickly as
possible.
i
iiJ
i±
City of Denton city Council Minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1966
Page 7
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he had spoken with a
retired doctor in the community and he appreciated the way the C4ty
was pushing to save Flow.
Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager, presented the report on
Economic Development. She stated that this was a preliminary
report, that the committee had met two times. The report was an
organization of the committee's brainstorming. The committee had
taken into account policies of the City that Pay hamper development,
the research by the Cott Committee, and participation in a study for
economic development. The Economic Development office at the
Chamber of Commerce should be ready by January. McKean continued
that before the next elections and retreat a final report would be
ready as well as a master plan.
Council Member Stephens stated that he felt the committee should
have at least one Council member and one Public Utilities Board
member on it.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that the make-up of the
committee had been recommended by the Public Utilities Board.
Stephens felt that more than one council member was needed for
monitory situations.
Nelson stated that the Council was important and that he could
approach the Public Utilities Board and 3ok to substitute a Council
member for one of it's members,
Stephens stated that two representatives from the city was
inadequate and there should be at least 1/3 of the committee members
from the City if not more,
Harrell replied that there were staff members also on the committee
and that he would make the list of staff membets available to the
Council.
Harrell replied that there was a delicate balance between the
Chamber and the City, The chamber wanted to keel, the commil so more
in the realm of the Chamber and not too much with the Clty,
Stephens asked if it was the consensus of the Criuncil that the
make-up of the committee be one Public Utilities Board mo-mber, the
City Manager, the two Assistant City Managers and two Couneit
members,
Council Member Alexander wanted to stay sensitive to the Chamber of
Commerce, He indicated that perhaps the council could suggest the
make-up rather than mandate tl,e make-up,
Council Member Hopkins concurred with Alexander.
Stephens stated that the chamber may welcome the added interest by
the Council,
Council Member Chew stated that he did not think this would be a
problem for the Chamber,
Council Member Alford stated that in all likelihood not all Council
Members would be able to attend at the same time anyway and thus the
Council would always be represented if there were two members to the
Committee.
City of Denton City Council minutes
meeting of September 1986
Page 8
MCXean then gave a report on the separate steps outlined in the
backup for Economic Development, Some additional steps that were
suggested were to host an annual city breakfast for local industry
heads to discuss Denton and economic forecasts, participation in the
National Institute of Trade to help exporting of local goods
produced here in Committee would continue to meand t AsJd expansion
report the f opindings The
council.
Mayor Stephens reported that the Texas Economic Commission would
hays a representativol Phyllis McMahn, here in Denton on Tuesday,
the 36th to discuss what the Economic Commission could do for Denton.
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parke, presented the report to the
Council on Space Needs. He stated that City Hall and the Police
Department had already used up all available square footage. The
committee had discussed both short term and long term decisions,
The committee felt that future efforts should be to build rather
than to rent. Short term needs included expansion of City Hall,
build a new law/court facility which would free-up the old police
department for additional space. Future optinns would be to have
professional help to assist in a long term plan.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that it would be wise to hire a
consultant to study space needs. He wondered about a second floor
for the present City Hall.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that staff had had some similar
conclusions, He also suggested branching of utility aepartmehts
throughout the City and to look aheau for office complexes in
downtown Denton for long-range plans.
Council Member Alexander asked what* a new police department woula
be,
Brinkman replied that the location was not as critical as for the
fire department but should probably be along one major street. He
stated that the committee would continue to look at options and
report back to the ^ounoil,
2. The Councirl received a report on miscellaneous matters from
the City Manager,
City Manager Lloyd Harrell stated that he would be going to
Greenville for a TMPA meeting, Those Council members interested
were invited to attend also. They would be leaving at 800 a.m. and
would be back by 200 p.m,
Due to an annexation schedule, it would be necessary to meet on the
23rd for a short special meeting, The meeting would begin at
500 p.m, and would be very short.
He asked which Council members would be r.ttending TML in Houston,
He stated that in conjunction with the TML meeting there would be a
special trip to Austin on October 30 for the Select Committee
Meeting on Education,
He also asked if anyone would be interested in touring the Gibbons
Creek Power Plant, Plans were not made at this time,
I
1-4k11 rte.:...
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1966
Page 9
3, The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal Mattera, real estate, personnel/board appointments, -No
official action was taken,
With no further items of business, the meeting was aujourned,
JENRIPER TRITI, DEPUTY
CITY SECRETARY
1579s
HATE: 12/09/86
CITY COUNCIL SSPOAT rostmT, ,
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Mani+ger
SUBJECTS PUBLIC HEARING FOR 2-1838 and ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE
RFCOMMENDATION2
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of December 9, 1986 and voted to recommend approval of
z-1838.
SUMMARY:
This is a request for a change in zoning Prom the agricultural (A)
district to the planned development (PD) classification on a 31.5
acre tract located at the northwest corner of Audra Lane and
Mockingbird Lane. If approved, the planned development will permit
133 single family detached lots ranging in size from 6,000 square
feet to 17,570 square feet.
BACKGROUND:
This proposal is compatible with existing zoning and land uses in
the area and will result in only a slight increase in the violation
of the area intensity standard.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GF.OUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund*gsit ub edt
Prepared bys City manager
Deni Spivs
Urban Planner
app ve
Jeff Me
Director of Planning
and Development
2000g/l
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1836 Meeting Date: DeoQmber 9, 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Bellaire North Joint Venture
420 S. Carroll Boulevard
Denton, Texas 76201
Status of Applicants Owner
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) district to the
planned development feD) Classifica-
tion. If approved, Lite planned
development will permit 135 single
family detached lots ranging in size
from 61000 square feet to 17,570
square feet.
Location and Size: A 3105 acre tract located at the
northwest corner of Audra Lane and
Mockingbird Lane
Surrounding Land Use
and zoning: North - Vacant; single family
residential; A
South - Single family residential; A,
PD-1.1
East - Single-family residential; A,
PD-64
West - Vacant; single family
residential; PD-811 A, SF-7
Denton Development Guides Low intensity area
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: This property has frontage on Audra
LanejU and Mockingbird Lane, collector
streets. Perimeter street paving and
thirty (30) feet of right-of-way from
center line will be required on both
streets. Silewalks will be provided
along Mockingbird, Audra, and
Oakshire.
(case 2-1838)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMR,TION (continued)
Utilities: Existing 80 water line on Mockingbird
Lane has sufficient capacity and fire
flow to serve the proposed develop-
ment. Existing sanitary sewer has
capacity for this project. Pro rata
charges will be requirid on bath
water and sewer lines. The existing
sewer line in the interior of the
project will be rerouted. Electrical
facilities in the development will be
"nderground.
Drainage: A major drainage channel will be
contained in a 50' drainage easement
running west-east through the center
of this property. Box culverts will
carry the water under Audra and
Mockingbird lanes,
ANALYSIS
This property is located in a low intensity area that is
currently over the standard by approximately 10 based on
existing zoning. When the intensity standard for the area is
violated, the next step is to determine the least intense, most
logical land use for the site. Planned developments with 61000
square foot or smaller lots are located to the east, weet, and
south of this property and the developer originally proposed
61000 square foot lots on this tract. Due to the intensity
violation and the over-concentration of small lot sixes in this
area, staff requested that the developer revise the request to
meet. SF'-7 standards (minimum 7,000 square foot lots). After
further study and negotiation, the developer submitted a new
plan featuring a mixture of lot sizes ranging from 6,000 square
feet to 17,570 square feet. The lot size distribution is as
follows:
Lot n,; ea of Lots 4 of Total Lots
6,000 15 11
61001- 6,500 38 28
6,5o!- 71000 11 8
71001-~ 7, 570 71 53
...~.•,..ey.i:yra'
""~?F` .-•-y . ?t7. 5 1.. roq;, v u'Fe a'l3'w s?~assk+ x j.
r.
(Gee Z-1839)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
In summation, this proposal is compatible with existing zoning
and land uses in the area and will result in only a slight
increase in the violation of the area intensity standard.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of November 12, 1986 and voted to recommend approval of
Z-1838iby a vote of 5-0.
ALTERNATIVES
7
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with conditions
3. Deny petition
ATTACHMENT;
1. Location Map
2. Detailed Site Flan and Preliminary Plat
3. Design Statement
4, Reply Form Totals
5. Property Owner List
6. Minutes of the PlanninV and Zoning Commission meeting of
November 12, 1986.
0423e
H lull
PD'I~
r-- rrr~rr L rr rrr rr
S w r
• PH4 A i Ct.
rr wrrr
PD~ t SF
~ t
PJ '
' ~rrw.rr• ' i
A
s,5 SF-10
00 r.r •.♦w-~GB
' rrrrrrrr i
pom?3 i
rrrrrr PO-34 ; .
rr r .w r rr r rr rr w r
r
Poo
PDdO A ` L f
rrr.. r
r
r•r rrrrrr rrr
~ .rrrrr.71 tr
1& t,L
+ z
SF*?
T••-~°• Nv~~'.S~/1'I1MK1 Mli 1 4Y Gl r i
~'I. ~ ~ M . AN II!/Wtt/, 1 I:N'~IfA p/y r y,
rrr ♦
a~~MIY~ .~rpt t/4WAf ►.+14 I
• i I/Y~y / i rllr/Y
At' is, 44. jk__
•111 r3 r n.f n 'A, ! A T 4 f 4, , .t '
^
GIItRf/R MFCws / , ' '"'ll • IT hRM _.Y
to NrO A 1+'rM1
AM-
/r I»I ~r} I y
bl
STRE~7` ~ sr ar
+a _ y • xFr aN I
Sol ` W
j IA x N 1/ r ~6 II 41 Ll ! L s of Y
IL
rjy M
N / 1~~. 1 ~ ~ -I e ~ 11
Oryrl
nl
GL4iMd N MM'TfN ~ d ~ J/ ` , ` ' • N ' ' NI N
S r IL 1= 3' y y j.. l' 1 1
lit
' --7trY o 'i ' M
. ~ - - x' a r I r~ 11" - -
-1
...,1 ~ r . r 1/ , r. I . TRTt• /NO.C~ I ,may 11.1.
+WM NYf~AMyr. Fr ~ 1.b RYNM f ~ W~ 14rp I ♦M~/I I_ ~ • ! 1. r
'.O etM, , 1^VfIiW ' 11Yr //Ar/►flu IY,yr
G1~«~• d all b ~ . - -
tnrr' A ~c",1 ir]
MAN
i~~ F+ KI Nx M lYN N r ' r ~ „ ' Yy~ - - I r /~~Yy1 ~ '
YMIYW 1 ~.y y• N MI11Y «II.Ib 1Y111~1•rrl'r r~Ir..Y
..II. ,a`E:r r"Yz'~iY,♦ I , 1rl,lllrxFl. /,•IY rlrtirN ..1 • . ~rI- -A^FZ)' , YY}
V
~MWM WxIW ~f 41xi.I H«r Y~r~
~ Yrl
'wry flll Y 11 ,r~ Yyyy~Iylr
„~~1'Y~ Y1/ ~Nr~H YM 1 F ~ ~ Ir. MIW. Y N~ FI 1111r1i 11' IY W."Illrl I•IIIIY ^ MI ~ rT
. ,.1,~:,,~' I~Cbl1A1R•C MoRi~~ nvorricr
.1,. "w Iwlnrl.'Y1~L.j'~Iy.r..I,IM;ai~ 3r,S/~Ijlr;?55h~/ri l
II` IMIYYI« 7.985NPI /+~'RP./i Irl rllr. crr`r nno
~ 1.. ~ .OIpl7•Y />P (lllrl''rrr 1Er[✓. '
1
w ~1 r/I M 111 rV F«IyI Y Hlr /r_ I . 1
• 1w~Y yY xY 'YY I M VIrY I 1. 1
Y,YrI BURKE ENGINEERING
~nll~• . ,.i YI 11 : W.1 4 rrxY 4Yr. aw 1 -'NpI/~tlL I~( I/',/ r~Y ~~/y M/ ~~~y ~1~y/~
~r.1Y~Y IX~111 rw rw.l +Y 1 .rl IY wn• n ..r.1. i, • .r IXr~L~~/. Minr~~~JJ/~I ~~rv/1//fC.. Pw~ OVn144,~Gi 1
.w ♦iYr ~I Y'I~•.yw~.r,yYPA.war "Y xl, I,• r..r, walr CON?]ULT1q CIVIL EN911EI1
AO 'P'4
tIMOM, /TIW IMI tM•MM
liar !4a/hl r T ;1
It C. C C. IT D • I /1II, 1 lot)
~15!4'-'6T#~dP Ft*'~r f? r f 1 , F xa,'~:... n .~i.y~. ~,i+.y "'~4` •f y..~`5'~3°mrC:::;~+' r Ifn
f
wVRLA
Geserol Notes$
1. Statement of Intent - It is intended that this land be xoned and platted
within the City Lial.ts of Denton, and be subdivided as indicated on the
Concept/Detail Plan and Preliminary Plat. The Owner will also be the
Developer, The lots are to be used for individual Single-Fasily hares.
2. Relation to Comprehensive Plan - This development in intended to provide
4.5 dwelling units per acre (considering net area) of detached Single
Family housing in an area designated as 'Low-Intensity' by the Develop-
ment Guide.
3. 'Ares Summary
Cross Ares • 31.50 Acres
Perimeter Road Basements • 1.23
Pipeline Basement . 0.42
NET AREA . 29.85 Acres
4. !.and Use - The only land use proposed for the entire tract is doacn.d
Single-Family. A total of 135 lots a;e proposed within two sections. The
overall density is 4.5 units per acre considering net ores, or 4.3 units
per acre considering gross area.
5. Off-Site Information - ,
Drainage - The bloater Drainage Plan has been consulted and the drainage
easements proposed are consistent with our estimate of what will be
necessary for the required drainage capacity. Additional offsitr analysis
is necessary to prevent dowantream proble".
Access - All access will be via Audra Lane and Mockingbird Lane (Old North Anad),
the only existing roadways.
Utilities - Refer to the drawing for locations of adjacent existing waterlines
and sanitary sewer lines.
6s Traffic and Transportation - Estimating the total trips based on 10 trips
per day per dwelling unit, the completed development would produce 1,350
trips per day.
7. Buildings - Individual houses will be located as indicated on the detail,
The maximum structure height will be two stories. Building setbacks are •
proposed as 25' for fronts, 10' for backs, 15' for sides at an intersec-
tion, and 6' for interior side lot lines.
8. Residential Subdivision -
Dansity ■ 4.5 dwelling units per acre
Total number of lots 135
Minimum lot area will be 6,000 sq.ft.= minimum lot depth will be 86 ft.=
and minims lot width at front building line will be 58 ft.
9. Tress - The existing tree locations are shown on the plan. Most will
probably need to be removed during construction.
10. Opea Space - No park dedications are proposed. The only open space anti-
,+e, °„«F'Y.R''Sy° .fr. e']L~c n"'°l..t,'`;:d}y$at fc " !TM'°.*t`'r~8°kM '*s!"yryr:?° ':g"P'Cz"4.'c •I'•'. S•AT. !',RS`+. lxM.
RIP
cipeted WilA bo the drainage am I" pip line 0"001 to, and aeither of
these will be intended for public use.
11. Screening - No screening device is considered necessary and none are pro-
posed.
12. Utilities - Existing and proposed utilities are indicated on the plan. A
portion of the existing 10sanitary sewer line will be rerouted through
Newcastle Lane.
13. Development Schedule - It is anticipated that construction will commence
on about 1 Her 1987 and be completed on about l Feb 1988. Section Two
construction is expected to commnnce on about 1 Apr 1988 and be completed
on about 1 Mar 1989.
14. Signs - No permawat signs are proposed for the developmient.
15. Sidewalks - A new 4' wilds standard City of Denton sidewalk is proposed
along the North side of Audra and along the West side of Mockingbird and along the
south side of Oakshira. No other sidewalks are proposed within the subdivision.
16. Landscaping - There is no common landscaping proposed within the subdi-
vision.
17. Lot Sin Distribution Summary -
Lot Area (sq.ft.) No, of Lots % of Total Lots .
6,000 38 28
6,001 - 6,500 41 30
60501 - 10000 14 11
70001 - 17,570 42 31
135 100
18.. Driveway Acceas Direct driveway access will not be permitted to either
Audra or, Mockingbird.
19. Channel to be built wil.n Section One.
20. Underground electrical system to be installed according to city specifications.
!
Z~1838
-s. n t e i ";.~Ti",," } q ,a p Q: .•.,q. .9m't .7 r'.y 4c` J^' 'sf v` eq;:i .,wrv.2g~+. szy VK-
L. W
PROPERTY OW= RMY FORM
CITY COUNCIL
~-1838
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Del Morton None Received
777 East 15th
Plano, TX
. t3
,z
w,
did Jjjl&V
JAC
Gti
i
i
MMMOVAN6
i
.I .j
r
Will
AAA
\ ' V
wommuft
II /
I ~ a
WMWWAft~
MMWMNNNENNMM
r
1
Jura
I
i! ~~~}11r 1 11f ,I
~~h3'at5L1 <.:f~ti h.YY'4~!'IIf~F
. ? C+^~:';# x+ ru3 d^W4n t,J•xrF,r ,;nk, T, w,
y
-If Agea
Noun=
.
"3 f X1 3 rl~~rn
V
dAl
A
\ J~
\ V
1
S
9
`4g1"~r.•,a
r
Oa~
r
man
•-.t a 'A~.. "'~S~"'~t^ ti .iT'.t°^'~' .~~4 n X h: n ~3 :a.n x~ ~ r:_'k ~"`y 'ii r Sy 'r'.d, r --'tt7,.'~~ ~a , c
Ne"aber 12, 1044
r
Page 5
BCi5I4 Mr. Claiborne stated that It seems that they
ave a net hbor versus the City of Denton standards and
the subdivision regulations are designed to protect the
residents of the city. He said that channels are not
always aesthetically pleasing. he said that the real
issue is two-fold, first is the detailed plan consistent
with what has already been approved and the answer is
yes. The second is whether the drainage is serviceable
and coopatible. He said the channel is not serviceable
' and probably preferable rather than compatible. He said
that he would favor the detailed plan but not the narrow
bottom channel.
Mr. Kamean stated that the propposed would require more
maintenenee and felt the net`hborhood in the lon run
would appreciate a channel that is more serviceable.
' Mr. Claiborne moved tr, approve Z-1836 and eliminate the
drawings for the drainage improvements.
Seconded by Mr. Escue. Motion carried (S-'i). Mr, Holt
voted no.
Mr. Claiborne stated that the drainage issue will be
addressed at the platting stage which is later on the
agenda.
Mr. Gorton stated that he had to leave at this time and
asked that when they consider the final plat of Dr. Cudd's
to consider the drainage as proposed.
B, Z-1838. Petition of Bellaire North Joint Venture re-
quest ng a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
district to the planned development (PD) classification
end approval of a detailed plsn, including the preliminary
plat of the Bellaire North Addition, The property is a
31.S acre tract located at the northwest corner of Andra
Lane and Mockingbird Lane and further described as a tract
in the William Lloyd Survey, Abstract #773. If approved,
the planned development will permit the development of 13S
lots for single family use ranging in size from a minimum
of 6,000 square feet to a maximum of 17,570 square feet.
Mr. Holt left the meeting stating that he had a conflict of interest.
Thirteen notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; one reply form was received in favor, no reply forms
were received in opposition, one reply form was received
undecided.
PSTITI_QNER; Brian Burke, Burke Engineering, stated that
t ey concurred with the staff report. He said that the
planning constraints on the property include a major drain-
age essement, an existing gas pipeline, frontage along
Audra and Mockingbird, and topography. He said that they
have been working with staff for quite some time and un-
derstand the ramifications for requirements of the public
improvements. He said that they have proposed a land plan
that will address all concerns. He said that Phsse I will
include all the drainage improvements to the west property
line and part of the perimeter street paving Improvements.
Phase II will finish the perimeter street paving improve-
ments.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
Richard Cushman, 1551 Mingo Road, asked about the im-
provement of the roads. Mr. Burke stated that the Im-
provements will be concrete with curb and gutter and 17
feet of asphalt.
~ X"~$ t', s• 5 t ';'h `+XF~ .3{ sera i'` k ~TF` a~.<5 H r oiTr._.wy"~~ ~*F, ~Th 'i:'~R '°k f'f n aPs
2 Minutes
November 12, 1986
Page 6
Rusty Callaway 3001 Weston Drive, asked about a light
system at the Intersection of Mockingbird and University.
Mr. Clerk stated that the project is in the bond issue.
Mr. Claiborne stated that this would be done if the Capital
Improvement Pl+1n Program is approved by the voters.
Mr. Calloway asked about the bridge in this area that is
being proposed and will It be improved. Mr. Burke stated
that it would be widened by 6-8 feet.
Mr. Claiborne asked if the bridge would be a box culvert
situation. Mr. Burke said yes, probably.
R E ORTi Ms. Spivey stated that this property is
te n a low intensity ores that is currently over the
standard based on existin zoning; therefore, the least
int,pnse, most to ical lani ust for the site must be con-
sidered. She ss1d that planned developments with 6,000
square foot or smaller lots are located to the east, west
and south of this property and the developer originally
proposed 6,000 square foot lots on this tract. Due to the
intensity violation and the over-concentration of small
lot sizes in this area, staff requested that the developer
revise the request to meet SF-7 standards. After further
study and negotiation, the developer submitted a new plan
featuring a mixture of lot sizes ranging from 6,000 square
feet to 17,570 square feet, She said that in summation,
this proposal is compatible with existing zoning and land
uses in the area.
REBUTTAL; Mr. Burke stated that he was available to
answer questions.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
BCiSIUNc Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried
(5-0).
Mr. Holt returned to the meeting.
C. Z-1841. Petition of The Nelson Corporation, representing
ysT ems-Development Corporation, requesting an amendment to
a planned development and approval of a concept plan. The
property is booted south of I.3SE and southeast of State
School had and is approximately 43.4 acres in the G.W.
Walker Survey, Abstract 1330. If approved, that amendment
would permit the maximum het ht of the structures to in-
crease from 2 1/2 to 15 stories and provide for a one
parking space to 300 square feet of floor space ratio
rather than a one space to 200 square feet ratio.
Three notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposition,
Ms. Carson stated that the petitioner has requested that
the height be limited to eight stories rather than fifteen
stories but all other information would be the same as for
as floor area ratios and parking are concerned. She said
that the Oakmont Developrent which is a 725 acre project
in southeast Denton was before the City Council for public
hearings in 1985 anJ due to some complications in technical
requirements the ordinance was not adopted until 1986. She
said that during the time between the public hearing and
the actual ordinance being drafted there was a conflict
between the staff and the developer's interpretation of
the requirements that were submitted to the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council. She said basically
this concerned the height requirement. She said that the
staff recommendation and then the recommendation from the
Commission to the City Council was based on the height
being limited to two and one half stories In a commercial
district. she said that the petitioners were under the
assumption that the area was a }'cumulative planned devel-
opment" and that the regulation coacming height in the
%~i s -:f 3, .:~~:w e,^r +r ~q, a ~Y,xn ~f'~PE a,.r~`~,~ r xi"S' y~, i ''~ydi,€~i,'is `~s. MAO
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE N0. 69-1,
AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 31.S ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AUDRA LANE AND MOCKINGBIRD
LANE, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A
CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD"
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR
APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $11000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the zoning classification and use designation of 31.5
acres of real property, described in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby changed
from Agricultural "Al' District Classification and Use designa-
tion to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use
designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
That there is approved for the district hereby established
the "Detailed Plan'i, labeled as Exhibit "B", attached hereto and
incorporated by reference; so that hereafter the district shall
be used and developed in accordance with the Detailed Plan
herein approved.
SECTION III.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
lath day of Jai:uary, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No.
69-1, as amended, is hereby amended to show such change in
District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions
and specifications.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
i
'g«t-z-=z
City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
other thing, s,. the character of the district and for its
peculiar au'.ty for particular uses, and with a view to
conserving t'e vaiue of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encouraging the most aypropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
Any person who shall violate a provision of`tti<. ordinance,
or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements
thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fino nDt exceeding
One Thousand Dollars ($1,00 .00). Each such person shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or
portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is
committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such
violations such person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION VI,
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14)
days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of
the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day 7f , 1986.
RAY 3'r EFHEtS',
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
9
Z-183#/PAGE 2
•Y,r-.'m -4"~'hg.!G ~'a 3ra. ~e r_ i-a,.y.„~. :k~*^.'iw ze a:rw+~.'-i~~~ ~j•~.i',eie i-' -rv 'z~s;._ ~ .f. ~
~ A
BEING a description of s tract of land in the William Lloyd Survey, Abstract
Number 7730 City and County of Denton, Texas; and being more particularly
described as follows;
BEGINNING at an iron rod at the point of intersection of the South line of
said Lloyd Survey (the centerline of Audra Lane) with the centerline of Mock-
ingbird Lane (North bound from said Audre Lane);
THENCE North 89 degrees 59 minutes 36 seconds West along the South line of
said Lloyd Survey (the centerline of Audra Lane) 10940.08 feet to an iron rod
at,the Southeast corner of a certain 12.091 acre tract;
THENCE North 46 degrees 49 minutes 11 seconds East along the Southeast line
of said 12.091 acre tract (mostly along a fence) 969.89 feet to a fence post
for a corner at the Northeast corner of said 12.091 acre tract;
THENCE South 89 degrees 43 minutes 58 seconds East 28.72 feet along a fence
to an iron rod;
THENCE North 46 degrees 54 minutes 04 seconds East 465.66 feet to an iron rod
for a corner;
THENCE North 89 degrees 15 minutes 44 seconds East mostly along a fence 829.62
feet to an iron rod in the centerline of said Mockingbird Lane;
to2anminutes
ssaaidMockingbirddegrees
angle pointseconds
thealong
the East SlineBoffeet
tract the describ-
ed herein;
THENCE South 01 degrees 27 minutes 31 seconds East along the said Mockingbird
Lane 430.09 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and enclosing in all 31.5 acres.
Area Summary:
Gross Area • 31.50
Perimeter Road
Easements • 1.23
Pipeline Ease-
ment ' 0.42
NET AREA 29.85 Acres
Z-1838
7 TIM' 'I
.Y`}}.r ,,'.3i~"+tSCg'rswrei.".TA 'f~aa„y?' a ws`r,3~"?+ r 's'r7 ":r:x r x t
EXHIBIT "B"
DETAILED PLAN FOR BELLAIRE NORTH, CONSISTING OF:
1. Detailed Site Plan and Preliminary Plat
(1 page), and
2. General Notes and Development Schedule
(2 pages).
Z-1838
s
r I ,1y ~ i{pj~'3 r. r'JMNe Iu r l' .';,us l •
~~1 ~''r'; •AkiN/MS~.r, rlaH',IlAM/ :-.I A'1~ q 1/r. s.
/nrprp f N %4M'M4 f `
a
alnr ! a u M 11 A r b s. s i`! ~M,,
{OMfO A ~ .l~W
Y M~ jlpA
~
' 1 3 I } t~--•x+'71 ~~y ~n.~ J
. IoM
A N li
y
~•c 1'14INIf( Mw0, ,rJa ` q 1.11'1 ` Y to 17 1 r °wl
6 . ?61 c t..
L to
is, Id. N4 r rw I Hr
% M ra IQ r1 ~e y {rl LI LL
1f /t _
le / a/ 1 M { N
to 'f~'PIGgL ` ~ \ . i c! 1 1 , t w a { ~ r
6UI6VIN4 "~E P.+lC.K ~ 7 1 ! nr _ nr`r4-'!
r et -T + -r, {
10
AIWIN u f'INf,+N r1 r'p. ~ 6 . A ~ CN/ "fit-'•. ~i • 1. Y I, Y - I
ae+krlra.a it. 3c, L .r y ` I y ,I
v loo
r.
.E
1 'r
l r;~ ti o ~ 1
1 r
~ , I t
r .rr
ff/I1 /r~.O~f Ir f
N„•Y x+rrl.l..1n ! ! N rtalM6 'r I ye , •"64"• ='L LAJV f yr"p, q/I/{ 'BMW W W"N + lAljO .
',w 4. u1 ra, .I.
w nyyl{L111,Y. „I I ~...I u~W1y1 N - _ ! rlr~ WAY ~'I
•,Y~IY YIW n. N' iui.i lM. II Y 111 V.r r.. INr I. 1Y .NN'I . n I I . •11A~ `'11l f ~~~~Q~ Y Ld~
ANY M I N.N I ~r~ r 1.
NAAMA
1. N X11 yy Nol I Ml~l I" r .IM. i. 1...1 . {
•'N' I .11.1+. 3LS0~l7O55lk
I IIY ; .h. .I
`.:1 '1 N"N~" i'.i ? 9,B511E'i
mow. ~ .1.. L.. lY QC`J k17~NB GI7•Y AND _
r - . r~ GnuNfti' nn ))GII{hpl, I><YA/i f
BURKE ENGINEERING
11 A",
ru. N I ..1 1.. 11 1 ..1.1. ' oNMM1• I
~..I
1 . ~,o.r SWAI!?E~11!JO1 1'i~6iflT7lNfi 81MAN BUA%E,PE.
.!N •+N '.a r -..11„ COtl FItt.TN(1 CIVIL. EtBiiNEEN
I.~T MYwrW.rr ..u 11,f.
~r/"•. 1K/A'.. /Lrr r j'k g4^It. w?1
0[N}pN, fl>«{ Itllil'1{t•~f/l
w.r1l~.iy
~ 1
sin
~S i .l{"`'. fa :.Y''w :.rz s~ ,"k. ,~A •,`'i.''^q':,. sY l rr+k ^eep""~f.,+p. ..y-pry S At..Y_.
MUM p
NOM
General Notes:
1. Statement of Intent - It is intended that this land be zoned and platted
within the City Limits of Denton, and be subdivided as indicated on the
Concopt/Datait Plan and Preliminary plat, The Owner will also be the
Developer. The lots are to be used for individual Single-Fiudly homes.
2. Rvlation to Comprehensive Plan - This development is intended to provide
4.5 dwelling units per acre (considering net area) of detached Single-
Family housing in an area designated as 'Low-Intensity' by the Develop-
ment Guide.
30 'Area Summary
Gross Area • 31.50 Acres
Perimeter Road Easements • 1.23 "
Pipeline Easement • 0.42
NET AREA w 29.85 Acres
4. Land Use - Tho only land use proposed for the entire tract is detached
Single-Family. A total of 135 lots are proposed within two sections. The
overall density is 4.5 units per acre considering net area, or 4.3 units
per acre considering gross area.
5. Off-Site Information -
Drainage - The Master Drainage Plan has been consulted and the drainage
easements proposed are consistent with our estimate of what will be
aecessary for the required drainage capacity. Additional offsite analysis
is necessary to prevent downstream problems.
Access - All access will be via Audra Lase and Mockingbird Lane (Old North Road),
the only existing roadways.
Utilities - Refer to the drawing for locations of adjacent existing waterlines
and sanitary sewer lines.
6. Traffic and Transportation - Eatissring the total trips based on 10 trips
per day per dwelling unit, the completed development would produce 1,350
trips per day.
7. Buildings - Individual houses will be located as indicated on the detail.
The maximum structure height will be two stories. Building setbacks are
proposed as 25' for frontal 10' for backs, 15' for sides at an intarsec-
tion, sad 6' for interior side lot knee.
8. Residential Subdivision -
Density • 4.5 dwelling units per acre
Total number of lots . 135
Minimum lot area will be 6,000 sq.ft.1 minimum lot depth will be 86 ft.;
and minimum lot width at front building line will be 58 ft. ,
9. Trees - The existing tree locations are shown on the plan. Most will
probably used to be removed during construction.
10. Open Spats - No park dedications are proposed. The only open space anti-
Ufa ~t. -r'` a
t ~ and spa p 001ine ,easement,, and r thtr of
these VilI be intended for public use.
11. Screening No screening device is considered necessary and none are pro-
posed.
12. Utilities - Existing and proposed utilities are indicated on the plan. A
portion of the existing 10 sanitary sewer line will be rerouted through
Newcastl* Lane. '
13. Development Schedule - It is anticipated that construction will commence
on about 1 Her 1987 and be completed on about 1 Feb 1988. Section Two
construction is expected to comments on about 1 Apr 1988 and be completed
on about I Her 1989.
14. Signs - No permanent signs are proposed for the developsient.
15. Sidewalks - A new 4' wide standard City of Denton sidewalk is proposed
along the North side of Audra and along the West side of Mockingbird and along the
south side of Oakshire. No other sidewalks are proposed within the subdivision.
16. Landscaping -There is no common landscaping proposed within the subdi-
visian.
17. Lot Size Distribution Summary -
Lot Area (sq.ft.) Not of Lots 9 of Total Lots
6'000 38 28
60001 - 6,500 41 30
6v501 - 7,000 14 11
70001 - 17570 42 31
135 100
18. Driveway Access - Direct driveway access will not be permitted to either
Audra or Mockingbird.
19. Channel to be built with Section One.
20. Underground electrical system to be installed according to city specifications.
. r
Z-1838
an 3+ m i" [ 4'l s*'"s- ca x^r-72 '4 `r .L •..:'~c~ j
9R?is 12/09/u
CL!" COCIICIL N"T FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council k
FROM% Lloyd W toll, City Manages
SUBJECT 3 PUBLIC M"aING FOR Z-1843
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of November 12, 1586 and voted to recommend denial of z-1843,
SUMMARY:
This is a request for a change in zoning from the single family
(SF-7) district to the general retail classification on an 0013
acre tract located on the south side of U.S. Highway 380 (University
Drive) approximately 350 feet east of Ruddell Street.
BACKGROUNDS
This request violates the intensity, offioe/retail concentration and
strip commercial policies of the Denton Development Guide.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDI
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no impact on the general fund.
Reape lly submi t d:
Llo Bartell
Prepared by: Cit Manager
Den se 8pieey V
Urban Planner
Apps ads
Jeff Mey
Director of Planning
and Development
2000g/2
v
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ANPORT TO THE CITX COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1843 Meeting Date: December 9, 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Richard Cushman
1551 Mingo Road
Denton, Texas 76201
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the single
family (SF-7) district to the general
retail (GR) classification.
Location and Size: A 0.913 acre tract located on the
south side of U.S. Highway 380E
(University Drive) approximately 350
feet east of Ruddell Street.
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Vacant, Single family
residential; SF-10
South - Vacant, Single family
residentialt SF-7
East - vacant, Single family
residential; SF-7
West - Bowling alley, restaurant) C
Denton Development Guides Low intensity area.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: The property has frontage on U.S.
Highway 3808, a primary major
arterial. Joint access should be
provided for this tract and the
remaining portion of the owner's
property with U.S. 380 frontage, A
sidewalk will be required along the
Highway 380 frontage of the property.
ryc~C: i a _ u 5.
(Case Z-1043)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Utilities: Existing 16" water li~,a has
sufficient capacity for this
development. An existing 8' sanitary
sewer n located approximately 1,250
feet east of this project at the
intersection of University Drive and
Redwood street may have capacity for
this project. A 10" sewer must be
extended from this linoi kcrove
University Drive property frontage.
Drainages This tract is located at the top of
the drainage basin so no significant
improvements will be required.
Natural drainage patterns should be
maintained. Ideally, a general
development plan should be done to
analyze the drainage for the owner's
entire 22 acre tract.
ANALYSIS
This request violates toe following three major policies of the
Denton Development Guide:
1. Intensity - The property is locate' in a low intensity
area that is currently over the standard based on both
existing zoning and land use. Approval of this request
would lead to a further violation of the intensity
standard for the area.
2. Office/Retail Concentration - The Development Guide
limits office/retail concentrations in low intensity
areas to four (4) acres in size and these conventrations
must be separated by at least one half mile. Over four
acres of retail and commercial zoning is already in
existence at the intersection of Ruddell Street and U.S.
Highway 380. Approval of this request will result in a
violation of the office/retail concentration policy for
low intensity areas.
3. Strip Commercial Policy - The Development Guide strongly
discourages any! form of continuous strip commercial
zoning or land use backing up to low intensity areas.
The property in question is located in a low intensity
area itself and the rest of the tract is likely to
develop as residential land use. Approval of retail,
zoning at this site would establish a commercial strip
along U.S. Highway 380.
r .yeri+K'fY:'r4?^w,, ::n ; .._.3w - a sb",'-., 7.'j +a rrmv++ ~Yt( ys tzp tRy' ; F" r;# -,..s .,.mod-F~e; 4
(Case Z-1843)
Page Three
RECOMMENDATION
i The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of November 12, 1986 and voted to recommend denial of
Z-1843 by a vote of 6-0.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Reply Form Totals
3. Property Owner List
4. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
of November 12, 1986
19478
4
w
kkkk
i
10 ITIM
1 W-P
MF-l
M !
T ~ 1 I~j1 .
Lij
010 rrrr, TTr, PD-
owl PO
_ I PD-111
/
MP-2 • MF-2
l^J
PO
H-28 A, _
I
PD-34
v
FVi0
+-'tN M1, -'F`771'°
mza ' "-tt amt.,. 'PROP91TY OWNER RZPLY Foln
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1843
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION
C. E. Curry None Received
1411 Last University
Denton, TX
Richard Cushman
1551 Mingo
Denton, TX
~3
4a
ZKS7 A
\
C
S
1
A J-446 X&JA LA
r
L
U
d
O
r
Widni
~4 i T sr wW'e s-`!~[ r. '^e..'r» f. p `5' 'fs"3' l rtyR .k.,_. . vy v:
1 3 ,
d
IiovsH~er iZ, 19t6
Page ~ i~
f
Mr. Holt stated that he felt the Commission would be run-
ning a risk if the request was approved if the property
was sold or developed br another person in regards to
parking. He said that he was concerned about the aesthe-
tics in that there could be an isolated tell building. He
said that he would not like to be living next to an eight
story building. He added that he would vote against the
amendment because of aesthetics.
Mr. Escue moved to reconead denial of Z-1112. Seconded
by Mr. Holt and motion failed (3-3). Mr. Claiborne,
Mr. Glasscock and Mr. Keenan voted no.
Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of Z-1811.
Seconded by Mr. Kasman and motion failed, (3.3). Ms. Cole,
Mr. Escue and Mr. Holt voted no.
Chairman Bill Claiborne advised that Z-1812 would be for-
warded to the City Council with no recommendation from the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
D. Z-1.443. Petition of Richard Cushman requesting a change
n zoning from the single family (SP-7) district to the
general retail (GR) district on a 0.913 acre tract located
on the south side of U.S. Highway 380E (University Drive)
approximately 3SO feet east of Ruddell Street. The prop-
erty is further described as a tract in the J.D. Lilly
Survey, Abstract 762. If the request is spproved, the
property may be utilized for any purpose permitted in
the General Retail district by the City of Denton Zoning
Ordinance.
Six notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; one reply form was received in favor, no reply forms
were received in opposition; a petition with 29 names not
within 100 feet was received in opposition,
PETITIONER: Richarl Cushman, 1551 Mingo Road, stated that
e as een trying to tell the property. He added that he
lives on the property right now. lie said that no one wants
to develop as SF-7 as currently zoned and live next, to
apartments or a bowling alley.
IN FAVOR; None present.
OPPOSED; Janice Collvins, 2011 Boyd, stated that she
lives in the neighborhood east of the request. She said
that this zoning request has come up on approximately one
acre of land that is joined by several businesses to the
west, ;equoia Park to thu east and Idiot's Hill to the
north est. She said that this zoning request is in vio-
latie.,i of tle intensity standard for this area and the
cona,,ntration and se sration policies for general retail.
She aid ths: general retail exists within a half mile
west and is «pproximately four acres. She said that the
rezoning would impair the residential development of this
area and encorrage strip cosercial into an established
residential area. She said that the access to Highway 380
is very limited and the property should remain Angie
family. She said that retail in a residential area
downgrades the quality of the homes and can bring about
slum areas. She said that requests of this type make the
people feel as if there is nowhere in the city that one
can be free of developers and speculators. She said that
staff recommends denial of the petition because it is in
violation of the Development Guide that was adopted by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council and urged
the Commission's support to deny.
Kelly Briones, 1506 Seminole, stated that one of the main
reasons she selected a home in this ores is because the
area was quiet and would be conducive to family living.
She said that the resomiar would be detrimental to all
r
yy 1~r!'i nY '•~ti F'r Ij~'I~ -
.VIY",v;a'P $.`Y T,':: Y_Te£4q.sw•
71
P 4 Z Minutes
November 12, 1486
Pass 10
residents that live in this area. She s yd 8th t( the
• notice was not posted on the property. ~h! asked for
those in opposition to !tand,
Approximately 20 people stood up.
Joe Moore, Sequoia Addition stated the he would like to
$ee the property remain as ~F-7,
Rosemary Wright, 2025 Glenwood, stated that right now they
cannot get OLt to Highway $80 and make a left turn at peak
hours. She said they have to to around to a-tr,tfic
light. She said that she feels if approved the traffic
would be horrendous.
Bert Hamilton, 1506 Choctaw, stated that if the property
i
will s toned commercial it will have a domino effect which
said thateeasttandewestethereeare nowlateralastreets run-
ning from Ruddell Street across that property. He said
that they cannot access to Ruddell Street because it is
already full of apartment buildings. He stated that in
years to come he felt this property would be open to sin-
gle residences and city will be forced to open streets.
He said if this property Is approved commercial then the
access to Highway 380 will be closed and then there will
be traffic problems on Mingo Road.
ST REPORT: Ms, Spivey stated that this property is
oeate in if low intensity area that is currently over the
standard based on both existing zoning and lend use.
Approval of this request would lead to a further vtolrti-~r:
of the intensity standard for this area. She said that
over four acres of retail and commercial Lining is already
in existence at the intersection of Ruddell Street and
U.S, Highway 380 and approval of this request will result
in a violation of the office/retail concentration policy
for low intensity areas. She said that the Development
Guide strongly discourages any form of continuous strip
commercial zoning or land use backing up to a low inten-
sity area. The property in question is located in a low
intensity area itself and the rest of the tract is likely
to develop as residential land use, Approval of retail
zoning at this site would establish a commercial strip
along U,S,.Highway 380. She said that staff recommends
denial of Z-1843 due to the violations of the Denton
Development Guide policies.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Cushman stated that this property is
t really
really shouldn't 0affectfanyone. He said ifdhave t to it
as SF-7 those roads are going tc be flooded by a lot
more traffic than a fresldentialedrivesaon Highway e38said 0. Heasaid ethat
one piece thin size shouldn't affect anyone. He said that
as Bonn as Highway 380 is widened there should be no prob-
lem. He said that he would sell the property for what it
has been appraised.
Chair declared the public hearing closed,
DECISION: Mr. Fescue stated that the violation of the
sp r t and intent of the Development Guide are rather self
evident as has been advanced by the staff,
Mr. Holt moved to deny Z-i813. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock
and unanimously carried (6.0).
F. rR
KE"UN ELIMINART AND FINAL REPLAT OF THE ORICiNA TOWN OF
, par a o , oc 23.
STAFF REPORT:
Mr. Ellison stated that thts property is
located a the northwest corner of Sycamore Street and
South Elm and the property is tewW central brtlness (CD)
and the proposed use is expansion of ala stisting buildly
J
° -,.-:...S.a.-..`may,, :.r .r . n.:;.~4
rEF p1; 1 VIF r=-fig~s~. r
t
CITCOUNCIL
REPORT FORMAT , A
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of: preliminary and final replats of the
Victoria Square Addition, Lots 1R and 2R, Block l;
preliminary plat of the Northwood Gardens Professional
Office Park Addition; preliminary plat of the Skyfab
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1
RECOMMENDATION: The P1inning and Zoning Commission recomme.ids approval
of tha above referenced plats and replats.
SUMMARY: The replat of the Victoria Square Addition entails
splitting the existing one lot office/retail devel-
opment at the northeast corner of N. Locust and E.
Prairie into two separate lots.
Northwood Gardens Prufessional Office Park Addition
is the first phase (one building) of a recently
approved planned development (PD) for office use at
the northeast corner of Old North Road and Hwy. 380
East,
The Skyfab Addition is a seven (7) acre tract in the
ETJ adjoining F.M. 2181 across from Hickory Cr ek
Mobile Home Park. The City Council instructed staff
to initiate annexation action and If the plats are
approved it appears that construction of an aluminium
fabrication business will be well underway before
the annexation process runs its course.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Property owners
FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined
Resp fully s b fitted
Prepared by: '
_AAA, A -
David L. Ellison
Senior Planner
Apph4i$tM
e
Director of Planning
and Development
.
qtt
..~it,i~ti tip, a soffit +~.t _ ~t__:_.. - -
r':~2x~y+ y.. n'~i,y nsvx.: =_FU -.•:3r u•'1± 'y ~Tir'g 'c'H{&r SY r.rs-x 'a4'-xr! asst a.w^°-i?'kT4,.Y,h +~g n.: * s..W-
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-SUP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATES December 91 1986
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary and final replats of
the Victoria Square Addition, Lots 1R and 2R,
Block 1
SUMMARY: This 1,661 acre parcel is located adjacent and
north of East Prairie Street between South
Locust and wainwright. The property is zoned
commercial (C) and is the existing Victoria
Square redevelopment. An abandoned automobile
dealership was in place before redevelopment
occurred. The purpose of the replat is to
resubdivide the property into two lots for
financial reasons.
Adequate utilities, streets, drainage, driveway
access and other public improvements are in
place and adequate.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replats.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary and final replats
o
Davili Ellison
Senior Planner
1670s/2
Now
i
'y f OINK[ ►Wt
LOT zR t
o. OCK i uea a.
fat ;IX 1Wn NF.
eanrL nw Tp01
a
d ► rd.. Y
I M N'N• t~111, x M M'N' Itt.N'
tmw tlt
1 N ~!t? lil►
~ I ~ it ~ytt~tlpl p ~1 ~ ~ 1~1
f I ACFWq','', t I
f ' 1 d~ ~.~'ry, AP"U,LOCATION IN•YLN
II r: rd lr 7j1 I FUXMAIO FfA CITY W CtWM
Al.
r
?i.:. f~
STANFORD "Aivy"Am
f i f I aNlMe:r m'm"' " I
' 1 unYM RN~t t[bIt[N s t[n [Nt
Wow
VICTORIA SOUARE
LOTS IR C ?A, /LOS _
ow 1.0% ONE tN YMt wltfr LM7N Now. rsw
LOCATION NAP
Nwl r oomm Fp too ONO$ [t 1' M' q [1017
' o 't i` h r .;'mot ¢z! _ y •
0ea1cAT 1014
STATE Of TV-U
COUNTS! OF overom
1PR6R0A4, I"A ANt [mewr"ne trio/. Ye Y w e.eN mf o onml of Joel tIl"W H mm wWW
le. W Smrrof• AMnM Mmwow PIP. Doom Coo", To", 04WAS eN K TM% 1 1►nmte / M0:0"
o e MN q 1w M1L rNwNe 4 Vim= I4M tell 03. Dad Roq"r of "w rosy. W Mot rM of o
4^t10x tomfl drwH1N Is 1 lni N oA a/. ermtel o YOer IItO. hM 11, DI" Ro101M of to" "11rT, 01111
( V.~"'o'ttAt 4ol nom twlWWir 4ww*so Y Aommi
cotworwa Y ► foM 7!♦IM OW Mr a w YMaMW of ow it" dowIwp M WI hWM fuw
4 1111,34, 10. ! .M' n.► " 60 tw Orfistintoittiog, r l1 VON" 1 4W Rome Lam" rMr M• aw Rrw,k W ow too" IM wMww mow N rN
1,mn 3,
I I g TNoAN 14111111 With w "M rI~W wy or no Le" i0ol l Akmbft Af IARO too "e fowl 11Ii1A
y lo" W " w be*"" - of am "OIL 00"" 01 Yoh 1110. rlim 07, Dmo Dotlr -
+ LOT 2P Si 1 7400 t101" It m OW" M mYY w 11MNMm 112ft" to 48 tool I/♦lo" Moto ill
wr BLOCK 1 N V::m 14 rrarw ON IAOw w 1,0161 14 ..umrw art it "It. I.w.MI N
0,87! Acres k TWO" MA04AIPrla.Wwf9.WOWVOWMNo"APOW-W"wlwwW~oWMI
""e" 101001 M N 1 femw 1Re"A wr iY for
wmmN
O rime" " " I t t It mw N abler A "mpY 0Nw a domm e" 01' Imse' feel 10 1 too" 7t' o eoeww
lie, fw me"
I Tom" MoA a dw"w of NIA fee a m few" Iron rrl tw M"
= L Li'. l1iLPltt.iflt..,~ ..f
p M 0436' 10' 11 W M • •r^f' n4 MIA M ioNmmr 31 mNemlwM looms" II" 1 iNNM" N.if fM M 1 loeM I/I•Im" toPN Ne
$ Y Se. 10, 0 li7.0' N M M'06' M IN,M' red for Witter.
p Thmoo I"m M Mtn" O WrmO M mmrerll 1"mf A tftMOO of IIUt fro 0 t foe11 oomort 1e1 a IM
~ilpp ( 8 0 own f1*44. mrmt rN Wl ftobm m*
* w,.r~pt i r".". moth H Ielew m Mot" A "ma 1Y" M► w W* rlt►fef-wy w N11►nMA S~ 1
I ii fNNw if 1 no tM to w f W rf M"Wq w o*01MM N "I IM I w" of k"
LOT J,A C MOM', r1m1Rrm& KN07 AFL" WSIT TIgY fRUVM
D 7401 " A"I CmOrewoe• I". AM "N►Ar ltew this 00 M i",Im lM eon" t""lb" wr"nr 4
Lw
BLOCK A 9 IA. 11! Noltk 1, t~ La u, Nw t i *1mm.tM I"n " it City « D"0e, 0"W Coorstoga 111
tim m " lel M
n 1 I Mk" I forHw W M a Mi nMwmoto IhN'l n"wA.
IN. M emi. L
0.790 Acres = Out 0411
s ^ STATe Or TLXAS
4 DrtM ry t4 mMMiMm NNmr MM for rho Into sf THS, "1 IYh toy Mn"olly n0"eN I"k
O IYr GOV. hawwo 16 M 10 be IM nlNm wM MW M Imk^u"t le IN f"rMlel 1"emw"t 1M
1 g 1Meer401N to d t41 4 rmMW W Itwr lw t4 rmfrM mM m"Ilttnllm" 14NI1 ImrlMwd 1M it
tm' NyfRp„ IIIL. o IN "emm4ly MWIL
r " 01.re m mMi ■ y hood mN wl o! effcr rW tM MT" .101{,
r.a M ",36'00' M 106.69' IM Wood
elt" 0 - \Y HN
Cwotlo HMeK
Au■r0,re>ti sjRTlrlcAre
1[NCAr ALL 13M 6V TII4R MtNNfTk
TW 4 ftdwA owsor1K RA11N"" how 40 open. M Mbr MMfr If" rN1 rW W Aw"MeYm
RLrLA7 wr"A wrwollYr Y eMMMM N" w wPftM , 1N IYr 14 Ym Mm W+e
~,~TVICTORIA BOUAFlE NM ~ "A" /y'
MINI A ROUT ap im I.. A 1 a VMIM IA 1N4MK Ifl ~ Mir µ
TW NILIIAN LOVIe IIIRVIT. A-T6R 0f7T AND COWtt M 4110CM MW liiwtmmilk
APO WM 1.01 9M T~ Rootipter" hub
w. Noll amm""a .Oros
f6'YI4tON4
ROKA f
VICTORIA SO~~}I11i.AW
16i LOTS IR &
0 4A X ~ R 1lTI~LDI OWWnn en
WAY N
t0f yM LOW
1111" OW loft low 1661tlTYR6
wt7t0
It% 2111
LWA
to. COS. YON MA' MWOM, WAS mot ALr 0• W.
gpow m Seek sot n wit 1' * AO' Ot ~Nlq..l~
e°' t!T /n{ r
Iris { ;
',.f It
V N
u
ry ~ u.-
vV , x r:. YtM1
77"
r/ - I
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: December 9, 1986
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Northwood Gardens Professional Office Park
Addition, Lot 11 Block A
SUMMARY: The Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council recently approved a planned development
(PD) for an eighteen (18) acre clustered office
development at the northeast corner of Old North
Road and U.S. 380 E (University Drive). The
plat for Phase I consists of 3.491 acres.
The general development plan for the entire 18
acre proposal was approved by the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council on October. 29
and November 4 respectively. The owner agreed
to, and the Planning and Zoning Commission and
City Council accepted, a general development
plan that included the following public
improvements in conjunction with Phase i.
1, installation of the drainage improvements
along the north property line to serve the
whole tract
2. installation of sidewalks on Old North Road
3. a deceleration lane on U.S. 380
4. extension of a watermain and service from
old North Road through Phase I
5. extension of sewer from Mingo Road to Phase I
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat of the
Northwood Gardens Professional Office Park
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
ATTACHMENTS Reduced preliminary plat
1663a
Y 'TF,
i ~
plr.lgmµtnlti rsf la ~ I '
w.U. q.A I 1 ~ I+
1r- r SIMJtrgIU•Ir
y I"" O ~ J~ lun/ 1 orur. o.f
v11 Nr.1f.W 1Y
e ' G t. V ~1 f •r iMiP lvrvll n1'1
v11 "1' rq. 36 1riM11011 h1, Iw. r1.r1I a a.
] ! i r ~r tCYlr VaW,Nrrlf7 ~~...'.k`.
l K j,
y=am"`( 4 !i i~l ! `rr r . • lKwirp•U
r1~
•1•
! / M.1~ 'W.7r ICn 11I1v1r 1.+• 1r .
1 ~I•W~n!'gq/~ • Jn r i~ .rlwr
ii rw •M Y:aWF n~n
10,
A! I ' w Nwil w~ la rr.a i
f~ 1 ~ f~-~+ 1 w ttN+w N whir
1~.~~r~ J r~JJ1JrJJ •JV1 +.::,r.rrvp«.rWwlllyrMwrfVr11r11R1r. i:! jYlnl.11'
%IlA VIwnvrµw RMP4 NJ . rww1 71 i I
t ✓rN•~. ~J r~r J,{\~ r 1 v
('~~~~~.~,..►Ny1 :1E. r~,''1l r= 1 Y1Y1M w4 Y4 1111 n
~r r ^-j ~W j,~1~1 \ I~ r wt:~+urWrr rJr ►+nIM .111r 6 r
/ ml:einii',., 1W M1i/IIrn11n►1r►rrMMa ~EiAI.»~ SI L PLAN
r" ~r LJ/ 1 tit rn r W ..R R p vwr
44 ~ •v04tlq•1 .rr Jf''.r"".~.r.~rJ 1-/l S~~.,l~i MM1rn111•wft , I..'
. : r^I41l1 nW ~ fr M IMr tires
♦.Y .Yr r.•WfnY MN r!•:WMgMK •+MN. l1YL.J SM.
alY~ 0 caawrr of aerie! row . r%„7 rltua wyfllfaw«w...r 10 `
9
i~CCEtq~D;:~4i 0 7
~~V S ED
4 t'-
.~Ii.y , r` .r,r * , i .I~l¢` ~.t`' S•.S rx ~ I. (~c~•Id'~•~~`r~ey ,.,~I';941 ~r`t/r1.;Als~'~'v'L~~; ,,alr ~:~r s ~I ~ c t
s y, .+"r«r_«rv.+r 7n ,P am.. q'.,..r bE °:?r<Ys'.`i".5Al sra ssi rrr1--rz i W_ i .v y`€' 'r. *'4~.ai"y~(''laa r .te*- +r ,ig
kpw kf-.. !n i '
41iY ~~uwl,l~
8AC&-UY SUMMARY Shbbi
MEETINU DATL: Decomber 9, 1986
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Skyfab Addition, Lot 1,
Block I
SUMMARY: This tract is 7.336 acres located south of FM 2181
approximately 1.1 miles from Hickory Creek Road and
adjacent to Hickory Creek Mobile Home Park. This
tract is more fully described in the A. E. Cannon
Survey, Abstract 232, Denton, Texas. The property
is o,atside the city limits, and a light industrial
development is anticipated.
The plat does not conform to the minimum require-
ments of the Denton Subdivision and Land Develop-
ment Regulations with respect to flow requirements
for fire protection.
Article 4.07 of the City of Denton Subdivision and
Land. Development Regulations states that adequate
minimum capacity shall be 3,000 gpm for high inten-
sity commercial and industrial areas. The Public
Utilities Hoard concluded at its November 19, 1986
sooting that the 30000 gpm standard must be met
before Skyfab Addition could tie into the City of
Denton water service but it did not deal with the
fire flow issue.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat of the Skyfab
Addition with the condition that the 3,000 gpm
flow standard be met prior to final plat approval.
The developer is contemplating requesting a vari-
ance of the flow requirement prior to final plat
action.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Reduced plat
2. Public Utilities Soa.;d Minutes - 11/10/86
h /~4iu'21WtL;Zir&.i!:.,i.`.;d116P'.n ..'L - u, .:t3i.t1i:,.t~r;i:S `i.:.~ t .'✓✓'f1.,.1 f.. ,s ,1~ wkJ~lEd1c? "i~~S r,: ,Y~_.t.1 _ _ .r ..i'
"Ala T 19 2 tsrsMi r MAYO Lm
t~ i' Nq~t y
0, ilpLm L" ~NM.A'f/iQYALM
1. tNino m Law o stum I •r11ar
no 70 i rirJ 511 •i•Q• i i. i. I
i, 111p t1 ~7N 'Ills
is am w 40
I x
4. ~1I iotai ie Sm ML M Mw I LOCATION MAP
O~tT.11' MN.MiI. f4 am Nm ftvag 1.>SI[ i ~ / 4 . /IDLY
I PARL Lunt? SLAT
W7w.7N1 I.OQA7Y !'tWl..
or Ni17 rNtralr Lan ~ .d. SKYPA9 ADDITION
V n 1, K= 1
7.30 wo
I I ~ A,i, Q~ w 'fiuKn'.wfr ..ao
H. a. THOMPSON Ywlr x Qs11aL TMxr
r.Yi ti.a MR, I r k_212
I ~pyEY
OMNEA
C AY-MAN ADDITION 1120 eJ rEm STW.q
un 1, coat 1 LEWISVILLE, 10AS
i 1
I
rl.~ j ~ I
J I wwrtwrnn~ naslY i
I , ~',M tlplLi
N w-iir w
,
rr
~~t~~~ '-'•I r+N!o►tlioa wAroR irinM ALnNNAtw0
\ 1. MINIM r wows*" nm us" r w1W IIIN
fa ( I NAetrwnN aNey iii' NN aim" a rm, `
Y. DAN od"m WOW M ON NMI OPWAV MM ""a" only. iIN. MOQ YI~I~I!/ my If t"I"
I
SKYPA AWI ION
aotMSYrOF OM~A► T&M 9
SPOIL, slow OM
11.S:AF WNaA ,.,Wr I!.
L, `1~11A ~4 "V 01 Wk
DATE: November 19, 1946
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AGENDA ITEM
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
FROM: R, E. Nelson, Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: CONSIDER WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE, AND
ENFORCEMENT OF FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS, FOR SKY-FAS
ADDITION. SKY-FAB, INC., OWNER, 1120 SOUTF. TZXAS
STREET, LEWISVILLb, TEXAS 75067 AND/OR THEIR ASSIGNS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Utility staff recommends approval of outside city
limits service for Sky-Fab Aldition, The Utility
staff and Fire Marshall also recommend that fire flow
requirements of 39000 gpm be enforced for this
commercial/industrial development,
SUMMARY:
r w_rwwr~
An existing 8" water line is on the south side of HWY
1181 on adjoining property to the East of this develop-
sent. An existing 15" sanitary sewer is approximately
50 feet South of this development. Utilities for this
proposed addition are less than 200 feet away.
BACKGROUND:
This proposed development is on the South side of the
East•West portion of FM 1181, and East of the North-
South portion of FM 1181 across from Hickory Creek
Mobile Home Park. An additional concern to this
development is fire flow. The subdivision rules anot
regulations (Article 4.07(e)) state that 3,000 gallons
per minute is required for high intensity commercial
and industrial development. Fire flow from an
adjacent hydrant gives 440 gpm. The developer con-
tends that his development sits alone with no other
tommerclal or industrial development nearby.. The
developer is not asking for a fire flow variance, only
Public Utilities Board interpretation of high
intensity.
The Utilities staff and the Fire Marshall both feel
that since annexation is imminent for this develop-
ment, the metal fabrication plant could bi, followed by
other industry of a sim'Llai usage, the 3,000 gpm fire
flow requirement should be enforced. The developer
wishes to address the Public Utilities Board
personally.
1
y i f. 9,,: of p. I 1 f V f ii fill
iu
77 _7 7
X3
Sky•kab request
Page z
b
PKOGRAMS , DBPAXTMkiNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton Municipal Utilities, City of Denton,
the developer, future developers, and the citizens.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No cost to City of Denton
Respectfully submitted:
Nelson
Prepared by: Director of Utilities
C, David Has
Director of water and Wastewater. Utilities
Approved:
W~
'C David Director ofmWater and Wastewater Utilities
Attachment 1: Letter requesting water and sanitary sewer service
Attachment 2: Location map
0237n:7
I gig III as
NOPL
.w.... ENGK%eEP &1"Gi • LAND PLAN YONG • SUFNEYN G
enwrw•owA VM ' MMUt•TMA#^ P.r.. OWS, POSSOMM
OS November 1986 86.0455
Mr. David Haar
Assistant Director of Utilities
Water and Wastewater Division
City of Denton
Denton Service Center
501 Texas
Denton, TX 96201
Re: Utility Service Request Outside City Limits
Sky-Fab Addition (Fig-Art, Inc.) p1ANNING DEVELOPMENT
Dear Mr. Ham: DEpARIMENT
Our client (Fig-Art, Inc.) owns a tract of land on Farm-to-Market Road 2181 so!jth
of Denton's City limits. There are existing water and sewer lines Immediately
adjacent to the property which were extended by Jay-Mar Corporation and Holigan
Development, Inc. back in 1984 (see attached preliminary plat). The proposed land
use for this development calls for the construction of a 5.000 ft3 office building and
a 1 000 fts aluminum metal _.,Since this property lies outside
Denton s y m s, we art making a formal request for water and sewer utility
service.
The development and land uses are similar to the Jay Mar Addition which was
platted In 1984. Enclosed are copies of Development Review Committee (DRC),
Public Utility Board (PUB), and City Council meetings which approved service
outside City limits and final platting for this development.
Please schedule this service request on the next available PUB agenda.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Regards,
Tim Fisher
TF/sm
enclosures
11ta t•+t:]RT WOMN m oPwF.. * OENTC7tV, TEXA, 70008 • 101 303.441E • METl1O 4 1
2150 SOUTH 0T9N*VK" • W;" 300 • UPA46VLL.E, TEXA8 11 7 • 1~'~i Qg7'Q41~
z'' : $ Nr ' ;dr4
f
_c
D
• 0 UK
LOCATION MAP
S - 2 MILES
SKYFAB ADDITION
LOT Is BLOCK !
7.336 ACRES
out of the
A,E. CANNON SURVEY A-232
COUNTY OF OEMTON, TEXAS
OWNER
SKYFAB INC.
1120 S.TEXAS STREET
LEWISVILLE* TEXAS
75067
,:J
a r pv
a 107*w- k7v
[.t
MINtI'l7s8
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
November 19, 1986
MEMBERS pRRShNT: Chairman Roland Laney, John Thompson, Edward
Coomes, Kenneth Frady, Lloyd Harrell, R. E.
Nelson
ABSENT EXCUSED: Nancy Boyd
STAFF PkBSLNT: Co David Ham, Ernie Tullos, John McGrane,
Glenn Jaspers '
OTHERS PRESENT: Tin Fisher, George Arthur et al
City Council Chambers 6:00 p.m, to 9:15 p.m,
Page 3
7, CONSIDER WATER AND SANITARY SbOLR StXVICE AND ENFORCEMENT
OF FIRE FLOW RL;4UIAbNhNTSs FOR SK FAB ADD ION. KY AB
IN U%NL 1 0 L W S I LE E
has introduced Mr. Tim Fisher, engineer for the Skyfab
Addition, Mr, Fisher explained that fire flow requirements
could not be met due to financial considerations, and
pointed out that at present the development was outside the
city limits and therefr,re did not require City fire pro-
tection. The Board discussed the request of Skyfab and
attempted to determine whether a "special and unique
exception" to the fire flow requirements existed in this
case, The Board ultimately decided to make the following
motion:
Thompson moved to recommend to the Planning and Zoning
Commission approval of the request for utility service
outside City limits, if the develo0 r could meet the 3,000
gpm fire flow requiremernts.
Coomes spoke in favor of the motion. Coomes stated that if
the required fire flow standards are unreasonable or im-
proper, it is the ultimate responsibility of City Council
to make such a determination.
.ii
'O'.'f1JO,i 71 •F-~l f Zr,^, i.
_~t~ltei ~~5.?,.rn~~.NO~„,v,~4._. , o'~;i rf~.. al f : _..i, -`.~hnt_- •.z ~
0923E
N0.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed snA recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies
or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has go in the City Budget
for the appropriation, of funds to be used for the purchase of
the materials, equipmont, supplies or services approved and
accepted herein; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$10,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2409 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid
Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as
being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BID ITEM
NUMBER N0. VENDOR AMOUNT
Avoedals tndust►° it.% a~
m Prey i n- Inc 40 OAO _ M
967.1 El {b ra us 19.258 AA
__%7fi_ ALL
SICTIO0
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitten= the bids for such items and agrees to
d ij. h r, 'iyy ~ ~ ; Yr LIi4~t il~u~3.Irie a wi61, :r Li ! Y /~l{1f'61
~1~,A'. ;k.'TJx., h b~`,»'Y 9 .,iYlA lau. "1.
F
77
CONTIM ATION SECTION I.
BID NUMBER ITEM N0, VENIVR AM"T
9677 ALL Bill Utter Ford $21994"4.00
9678 29394 Dave Krause Dodge 1699417.20
9678 510 54 Dower AIC 54.183.69
9680 ALL Dickie Mork Clothes 209WO.OC
9683 ALL F E 39 Inc. 57.6OD.00
~ iw9
w k'•
purchasa the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
acd for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
SECTION 111.
That should the City and persons submitting approved and
accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his
designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the
written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums
contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein
approved and accepted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contrac~ made pursuant thereto as authorized .;rein.
SECTION V&
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 9 day of _ December 1986.
RAY
MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CfiAtEUTTE AL , MY 91CRETUY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
BY: I
PAGE TWO
l
1 .i 1 . j ti.' bait.4~ll~aid lbL 'ti .I. J ♦ t L { 4 1' a ~'S.e 4 3 • i.
_ t n., - S .L.. S!~P r3.A•7,..1 .i. J;f, : .R.v~. e,. i.. •_N11.t •
' DATE: December 9, 1986
JQTY COUpCII. REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BIN 9672 - RETUSE FEEDWATER HEATER
ff$N 'I TI : We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of
Avondale ndustries in the amount of $50,255.00.
• This bid is for the materials and labor to rutube the feedwater
SU ea er• on Generating Unit N4 at the Municipal Power Plant.
BACIWl0~1,MID: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, OEPARTIOTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Maintenance of Power Plant
FISCAL 111PACT:
1986/87 Budget Funds ACCTli 610-080-0251-8339-E312
Maintenance of Power Generating Equipment
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Pr ared by:
Name: Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
,
n
Name: John J. Marshall, C.P.M.
TftJ1: Purchasing Agent
1 I f I I I
HID 1 9672 ISWTHNESTERN I AVONDALE I GENERAL I I I
DID TITLE RET50E FEEDNATER NEATER I ENGINEERING I INDUSTRIES I ELECTRIC I I 1
OPENED 11/18196 2111 P.M. I CO. I I CO. I I I
ACCOUNTI 618-191-!251-8339-E3f2 I 1 TULSA I I I I
I I f 1 I I
----------------------I-------------I-------------I-------------I-------------I
1 I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
----f---------f----------------- °_-----I-------------i-------------I-------------i-------------I---°.-------{
! I I I 3 I f I
1. 1 LS IRETUDE FEEDWATER HEATER 1 64,831.11 1 511255.16 1 58,192.10 1 1 I
I I i f I I I I
J I I 1 I I I 1
! I DELIVERY 1 21-21 NKS 1 1 56 DAYS I I I
! ! I 1 I I f I
! I i I i I I I
I I i I f I 3 I
I 1 f I I I I I
I f I I I 1 ! I
I I I 1 I ! I I
DATE: December 9, 1986
CITY CDINICILT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BIN 9674 - UTILITY POLE TREATMENT B REINFORCEMENT
RECMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest complete
bid meeting specifications, Osmose Mood Preserving, Inc. of Waxahachie, Texas
for an estimated total cost of $409000.00.
AWRY: This bid was sent to the only known Contractors providing
this type of service in this area. We received two bids and the bid from
Osmose is the only complete bid providing for the treatment as requested as
well as bidding the reinforcement of existing poles. With the above Osmose
is the only bidder meeting our specifications and bidding all items. We have
again as in the past budgeted for a specified amount and have assigned specific
sections of the City to be inspected, treated, reinforced, etc.
BACKED: Tabulation sheet
PROMMl DEPARTFENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
This is an ongoing yearly project in the Electric Utility
Department. Account N 610-080-025?-8339.
FISCAL. IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund.
Respee,tfully submitted:
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name: o ars a . . .
Title: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Maw : Jdhn J. Marshall, C.P.M.
T1L1l:Purchasing Agent
! I I 1 I ,
BID 4 4674 1 CENTRAL I DOMOSE I I 1
210 TITLE POLE TREATMNT i REINFOROTI UTILITY ! NOOD I I I
OPENED 11/18186 21111 P.N. I SERVICES I PRESERVING I I I
ACCOUNTI 6!1-181-1262-8339 I 1 CO. I I I
I f I I I
1-----------•--I-------------I-------------I-------------I
1 1 QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
----I---------I- ------------------------I-------------1-------------1-------------I-------------1
I I I I i I I
1. 1 IPOLE INSPECTION i 1REATMTI I I I {
A. I I TREATED POLE 1 11.61 1 13.76 { 1 I
b. I 1 REJECTED POLE 1 11.11 1 12.93 1 1 t
c. I I REPORTED POLE 1 1.81 1 1.90 1 I I
U. 1 1 SNIONTER INSPECTION I NO BID 1 3.41 1 1 I
a, 1 1 ROLLON HEART INTERNAL 1 4.11 1 6014 1 1 I
f. I i FUMIGANT TREATMENT 1 7.111 1 8.13 ! 1 1
Q. 1 I TREATED REJECI POLE 1 11.51 1 14.36 1 I 1
h. I 1 WORK SUMMARY 1 NC.3.111 1 1.14 1 1 I
{ 1 I ! I I 1
1 1 1 I I I I
I IPOLE REINFORCENEN7 I I I I I
t, I I REPORTED POLE 1 00 1 17,11 1 1 I
b. I I REJECTED POL! i NB I A/C I I !
to I I REINFORCED ME 1 91 1 211,11 1 1 I
I I I 3 I I 1
I f 1 I i I I
I I I f I 1 1
DATE: December 9, 1986
CITY g MIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FRON: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID/ 9675 - POWER RESCUE TOOL SYSTEM
RECOI~EM- TION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bit meeting
specification of Sunfire Apparatus in the amount of $12,258.00.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a hydraulic power rescue
too or use by the Fire Department.
The lower price offered by Russell Brothers is for a heavier
unit with less pulling force and a smaller spreading capacity.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet
PROGU M15. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Fire Department
FISCAL IMPACT:
1986/87 Budget Funds ACCTN 100-060-0051-9104
Fire Dept, Capital Improvements Vehicles A Equipment
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
1 ~
ti
Name: Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
4m: John J. Marshall, C.P.M.
Tjtl#; Purchasing Agent
I t I I ! I I
BID 1 9615 1 MDODY-DAY I SUN FIRE I CRASH I RUSSELL I RUSSELL I 1
BID TITLE POKER RESCUE TOOL I I I RESCUE I BROTHERS I BROTHERS I 1
OPENED 11119/98 2t11 P.M. I I I EQUIPMENT I OF TEXAS I OF TEXAS I I
ACCOUNT! 11!-168-1851-9181 1 1 1 SERVICE I I I I
I I I I I ALTERNATE I I
-----I------------- I............. I------------- I-------------I- -----------I-------------i
1 I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
----I---......{----------- .-------------I-------------I-------------I-------------I---._--------I-.--_..------I-------------I
I I 3 I I I I I I
I. 1 1 IMODEL 31C SPRFADFR I NO BID 1 11181.0 1 NO BID 1 1,61b.25 1 31111.11 1 I
! r I I I I I I I
2. 1 1 IMODEL 25 CUTTER 1 1 21116.16 I 1 21216,25 1 21041.0 1 !
I I I 1 I I I 1 I
3. 1 2 IMODEL 31 RAMS N/BASE I 1 21392.0 1 1 21511.51 1 21621.11 1 I
1 I I I I 1 I I I
1. 1 1 INODEL 1118 POWER UNIT 1 1 31881.16 1 1 3}681.25 1 2,696.11 1 1
I I t I I I I I I
5. 1 1 IAUX HAND OP PUMP 1 1 651.11 1 1 552.56 1 512.11 1 I
i I I 1 I I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I TOTAL 1 1 12~258.It 1 1 12,139.15 1 111604.11 I I
I I ! I I I I I I
I I DELIVERY 1 1 31 DAYS I I I I I
I I I I I I I 1 I
l I I I I I I I I
1 I I I { I { I I
s'
DATE: December 9, 1986
CITY COU116IL REPORT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9676 Modular Computer Boom at Power Plant
REC WT1!N: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder W.W. Cannon Co.
of Dallas for the total amount of $20,933.00.
SUMMARY: This bid was sent to several prospective vendors. We received three good
reliable bide. W.W. Cannon Company is the low bid an for the complete project.
This room is for the Computer Controls at the Power plant and must be constructed
as such with a raised floor sound deading and insulated walls. This bid includes
everything including electrical wring, except air conditioning and if required
floor covering.
8ACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS. DEPARTIJEWS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electrical Utilities Production & Distributior.
FISCAL IMACT: Budgeted Finds 610-080-0251-9213
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name; JohA Marshall
Title:' Purchasing Agent
Approved:
NeeNt: John Marshall
T}Ill:' Purchasing Agent
I I I I I
BID 1 9616 1 M.C. I N.N. I W. A. I I
BID TITLE MODULAR COMPUTER ROOM I EQUIPMENT I CANNON I 1AYLOE I I
OPENED 11/18186 2111 P.M. I CO. I CO. I CO. INC. I I
ACCOUNTI 611-181-1251-9213 1 1 1 1 I
i I I I I
I............. I------------- I------------- I-------------E
1 1 QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
---I---....-.1-------------------------I------------- 1-------------I------------- I-------------1
I I I I I I I
1. I L.S. I MODULAR COMPUTER ROOM 1 25,999.12 1 281933.11 1 23,266.18 1 I
I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I
I I DELIVERY I 1-B NKS I 6-1 NKS 1 6-8 NKS I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I i
I I I I I 1 1
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
1 I I 1 I I I
DATE: December 9, 1986
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9677 - POLICE PATROL SEDANS
RECOMIENDATION: we recommend this bid be awarded to Bill Utter Ford in
the amount of 112,193.00 each for 18 sedans. Total bid package $219,474.00.
SUMMITRY: This bid is for the purchase of eighteen (18) Police Patrol
Sedans. Six units are motor pool replacements and 12 units are additions
to the fleet. The motor pool replacement units are normal annual replacements.
The fleet addition units are for continuation of the "assigned office program."
Bids were solicited from four qualified local bidders. Chester Morris Chrsyler
Plymoi(th and Dave Krause Dodge were forced to "no bid" due to Chrysler Corporation
relocating their rear wheel drive assembly plant. Triangle Chevrolet chose
not to reply to our bid solicitations for unexplained reasons.
BACWAMD: Tabulation sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPART1ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Motor Pool as,d Police Deapr+.ment Operations
FISCAL IMPACT: 12 units will be funded through a tease/purchase agreement
to be prepared for Council action at a later date. 6 units will be funded in a
combination of Motor Pool funds $47,913.00 and 198¢/87 Budget ACCTN 100-070-0043-9104
in the amount of $25,245.00.
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name: Tom Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
N4W : John J. Marshall, C.P.M.
134; Purchasing Agent
t I I I I 1
BID 1 9677 1 BILL I DAVE I TRIANSLE I CHESTER I I
BID TITLE POLICE SEDANS I UTTER I KRAUSE I CHEVROLET I MORRIS I 1
OPENED 11/25186 2111 P.R. I FORD I DODBE I I CHRYIPLY I 1
ACCOUN14 I I i ! i I
I I 1 I I I
I............. 1.........---•I------------- I------------- I--.----------I
4 I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR l
----1---.._..I------------------------- 1-------------f------------- I------------.I------------- I-------------1
I I I I I ! I I
I, 1 16 1 POLICE PATRDL SEDANS 1 17,193.11 1 NO BID 1 MO REPLY I NO BID 1 I
1 I I 1 1 I 1 I
I I I I { I I 1
I DELIVERY 1 61-91 DAYS I I I I 1
I I 1 f I I I I
1 I WARRANTY 1 425.111 1 1 t I I
I I i 1 I I I
f I I I I ! I I
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I
I t I I I I 1 I
I
,CAS
DATE: December 9,1986
CITY COIMCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell. City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9678 - PICKUPS AND ONE TON CHASSIS
RECOMIEIMAIION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting
specification as listed below.
ITEM UAN. DESCRIPTION VENDOR PRICE EXTENDED PRICE
1. NOT TO BE PURCHASED AT THIS TIME
2. 5 ton 9WB pickup eve rause Dodge $ 9,049.00 $45,245.00
3. 9 } ton LWB Pickup Dave Krause Dodge 9,149.00 82,341.00
4. 4 3/4 ton LWB pickup Dave Krause Dodge 10,387.00 419431.20
5. 3 1 ton Cab/Chassis SWB Dower GMC 10,797.67 32,393.01
5a. 2 1 ton cab/chassis LWB Dower GMC 10,895.34 21,790.68
6. NOT TO BE PURCHASED AT THIS TIME
TOTAL BID AWARD - $2239200.89
Dave Krause Dodge total award - $169,017.20
Dower GMC total award - 540183.69
NOTE: Due to the specific uses by some departments a variety of optional
equipment will be added to some vehicles. None of which is significant
dollar value to alter the low bid recommended award.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of 23 pickups and one ton
chassis -for ur by the City of Denton. Five units are fleet additions for:
Water and Sewer (1), Electric Distribution (1), Electric Metering and Sub
Stations (2), and Wastewater Treatment (1). The other 18 units are motor
pool replacements.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGIULIS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Motor Pool Fleet and the various using departments
FISCAL IMPACT:
This purchase will be funded from Motor Pool funds and
budget funds from the various using departments.
Motor Pool - $114,998.48
86/87 Budget- 1085202.41
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd V, HaFrell
City Manager
page •z.
December 9, 1986
BID# 9678
Prepared by:
Name: om aw, ;
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Name:,-Jo J : Marshall, ,
Title: Purchasing Agent
! I I I 1 I
61B t 9671 1 PILL 1 00 1 TRIAMBLE I DAVE I I
818 TITLE PICKUP/ i 1 TON CHASSIS i UTTER I OX I CHEVROLET I KRAUSE I 1
OPENED 11/25/66 21ll P.M. I FORD I I 1 DOD* I I
ACCOUNTO I I I I I I
I 1 I I I I
I-------------I-------------I-------------I------------- I-------------I
t 1 OTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR t
--_.I---•---..;---------------- ---------I-------------I-------------I------ 1-------------I-------------I
1 i I I I i I I
i. 1 1 1112 TON MID SIZE P/U 1 61174.0 1 11651.91 1 NO REPLY I 6964.3.0 I I
1 I I I 1 I I I
2. 1 S 1112 TM FULL STZE P1U $01 91191.0 1 91167,24 1 1 9,149.00 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3. 1 9 11/2 TON FULL SIZE P/V Lai 9,955.0 1 91334,11 1 1 99149.0 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
44 1 4 1314 TON FULL SIZE PIU Lai II,B36.101111 1 11,632.69 1 1 119367.81 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5, 1 S 11 TON CA6/CHASSIS 1 111945.11 1 11,797.67 1 1 111696.11 1 1
5A. I I ADD FOR LONG IMIEEL 9ASE 1 1 97.67 1 1 1 1
6, 1 1 1314 TOM CARED VAN 1 12,476.N 1 11,657.33 1 1 110996.0 1 I
! ! i I I I I I
I I I I I I I ►
I I DELIVERY 1 61-91 DAYS I 75 DAYS I 1 91-151 DATE I 1
I I i I I I I I
I I I I I I I 1
I I I I I I I !
"•yc"%h', M~^. 4 ~.a. ~m .x~~rtgm N _'A'^T:,a H 'F f ~rA.',4 ~n _~l 'd 4'j`F ~ ...g T^'~`_ • t fY a
t.
DATE: December 9, 1986
CITY COMILREPOR_T
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM= Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SL"CT: BIN 9680 - UNIFORMS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
NOW
NDA I K: We recommend this bid be awarded to the overall low bidder
fora items rental and/or purchase to Dickie Work Clothes, This award at
the prices indicated on the tabulation sheet. The low overall total of $70.26.
Estimated total usage of $20,000.00.
Y: This bid was sent to several vendors in the Denton and Metro-
p ex area. We received six bids, three complete and three for sale of items
only. The low for both rental and purchase is Dickies, therefore we are awarding
to the low bidder for all items, The uniform policy is in the Drocess of
being rewritten and approved. This may change so that some uniform shirts
may be rented and some may be purchased. It is the intent of this bid that
all winter coats or jackets will be purchased. The award as above should
provide for all items at present. Any major changes could require another
bid.
BACKGROM:
Tabulation Sheet
fVfflo RiPARTNIFJITS OR 6R~1lIP,E AFFECTED:
Uniforms for City Employees as budgeted.
f,ISCAt FACT:
There is no additional impact on the General Fund.
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd Y. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name: John J. Marshall, C.P.M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
John J. Marshall, C.P.M.
>~Iti Purchasing Agent
f I ! 1 1 I 7 t
/I8 4 9681 ! FACTORY I DICKIES I DONIVAN I PREFERRED 1 1 1 K 1 TEXAS I
BID TITLE U1IFORMS-07Y EMPLOYEES I SALES I NORI( I UNIFORMS t UNIFORMS t SERVICE 1 INDUSTRIAL I i
OPENED 11113186 2111 P.M. I I CLOTHES I I I I SERVICE I t
ACCOtM1T4 I 1 I { I I { )
I I I 1 { I I i
+1- t `-DIY .rl--- ITEM DESCRIPTION I . VEINNIR..-I VENDOR----1- -VENNQA-- •1-` VENDOR.-~ I---VENDOR ---I---VENDOR I---V-----ENDOR
I..,_•-..--I I-°-----...... I-------------i I------------- I-------------1-------------1-------------1
I I RENTAL I I I I I 1 1 t
I I I I I I I I I I
!I ISHIRTS 111% COTTON 1 1 2.41 1 1 1 4.25 1 3.35 1 I
1 1 i 1 1 I I I f I
1. 1 ISHIRTS b5135 MEN 1 1 2.15 1 1 1 2175 1 2.45 r f
1 I NOMEN 1 1 2.21 1 1 1 2,75 f 2.45 1 {
I I { I I { I 1 I r
I I PURCHASE I I I I I I ( {
I I I ! { 1 1 { i I
3. 1 ISHIRTS )III COTTON 1 11.45 1 8.61 1 II." 1 11.11 1 12.0 1 11.16 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4. 1 )SHIRTS 65133 MEN 1 7.15 1 8.13 1 9.N 1 9.25 1 1I.N 1 11.95 1 1
i { MEN I 9.15 { 1.3b 1 8,11 I 9.25 i II.M I I1.95 I 1
I I I I I I I ! I I
5. 1 ININTER JACKETS 266 1 23.51 1 18.86 1 18.95 1 22.95 1 25.N 1 21.N I I
I I I I I I I I 1 1. 1
b. I ININIER JACKET 1 74.51 1 19,65 1 19.95 1 24.95 1 26.N 1 21.11 1 I
I i 1 I t J I 1 1 1
I I i I I t I 1 t I
I ITOTAL 314,516 1 76.45 1 63,51 1 65.91 I 77.11 1 83.0 1 73.16 I I
I I ! 1 1 t I 1 { I
I ITOIAL 11213,41516 1 1 71.26 1 1 1 92,15 1 11031 1 I
i I f I 1 I I I i I
I I I I t I I I ! I
DATE: December 9, 086
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TG: Mayor and Members of the City Council
I
FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BIO/ 9683 - LIQUID FERRIC SULFATE
NOMFiElIOATI011: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting
specification.of FE3, Inc. in the amount of $128.00 per ton for the annual
estimated use of 450 tons. Total bid award is estimated to be $57,600.00,
SIMMOT: This bid is for the purchase of an annual supply of Ferric
Sqlfate~for use in water treatment at the Water Production Plant, The annual
usage is estimated to be 450 tons and will be ordered on an as needed basis
during the contract period.
BAC10iiRO1M Tabulation sheet
Memorandum - Jerry Roush
PRO WAMS. DEPARTIEN?S OR AROUPS AFFECTED:
Utilities/Water Production Division
FISCAL IMPACT:
1986/87 budget funds ACCTN 620-081-0460-8105
Water Treatment Chemical Supplies
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd V. Harrell
6!ty Manager
P aced by:
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Titie: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved: `
Nate: Jo 'J. i4arshall, C.P.M.
Tull; Purchasing?""t
a
I 4 1 I I I I
BID 1 983 1 STAIIFFER I DALUM I NALCO I FE 3 1 DIXIE I f
810 TITLE LIQUID FERRIC SULFATE I VNICAI I INC. I CHEMICAL I INC, I PETRO I I
OPENED 11/25186 2111 P.M. I I I I I CHEMICAL I i
ACCOUIT$ I I I I ! I !
1 I I I i I I
............................•.------..--I-------------I- -----------I-----.-------;.............I.......-----I........-----I
f OTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I YEW I VENDOA i
5------...I-y-----------------------I-------------I............. I-------------I-------------I- -----------I-------------i
I l I I I i 1 l f
1. 1 451 19% SOLUTION LIQUID I NO 110 I NO 119 1 461.11 1 12818 1 135,76 1 I
1 TONS IFERRIC SULFATE I I I I I 1 I
I I k I I I 1 I i
I I I 1 I I I I I
I I DELIVERY t I 1 14 DAYS I I DAY 1 7 DAYS I I
I I ! I I I 1 1 I
I I I i ! ~ I 1 1
I I I I 1 I I I 1
i I I I I I I 1 t
I = I I I 1 I I k
1 I I I I I I I
1 } I I I I 1 I !
I I 1 I I i I I I
1 I ! i I I I 1 1
:a.... +F ,z~'x _T~Erx a s 4A ;,.r: Ste. a.r rf~ '~rwss.~a±
Cl" of DENrON DENTON, rEXAS 70201
MEMORANDUM
"a= mm mm m mm m
TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FMN: Jerry Pbush, Water Production Superintendent
DATE: November 26, 1986
SL JWT: Bid Evaluations, Ferric Sulfate
Bid Nuntw 9683
Fe 3 Inc. has the lamest bid on 450 tons of Liquid Ferric Sulfate and meets
all specifications. Utilities/Water Production Division ro=monds award of
the contract to Fe 3 Inc.
J Lam.
erry ftuW,
Water Production Superintendent
JR/se
co: Dave Hmn, Director Water/Mote Water Utilities
C"
M
All
r. •'~i X17 r
i~LL
V ~o
,m ~•r..~.-,~+ra~+~',-szwwq~w t ,T,. y...;:~,s a~ r; rN; -'c,
0923E
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the City has solicited received and tabulated
competitive bids for the construction of public works or
improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and
City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
received and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals
and plans and specifications therefore; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$10,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2,09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
-NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the following competitive bids for the construction of
public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita-
tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and spec.'fications attached
hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest
responsible bids:
BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
9670 Joe Bensda Construction t 6 n`n,
SECTION 11,
That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive
bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the
person submitting the bid for construction of such public works
or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person
shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to
Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and
' r a.. An`"
furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification
of the award of the bid.
SECTION III.
That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all
necessary written contracts for the performance of the
construction of the public works or improvements in accordance
with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such
contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and
Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the
terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards,
quantities and specified sums contained therein.
SECTION IV.
That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive
bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and
improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized
contracts executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 9 day of December 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE MEN9 CITY SECRETM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY :
PAGE TWO
DATE: December 9, 1986
CITY COLA UP REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID/ 9670 - CIP SECTION "N" WATERLINES 6" AND 8"
RECQR MDATIOM: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest
bidder, Joe Benson Construction in the amount of $156,692.00.
The Public Utility Board recommend approval.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the construction of 6" and or
- water lines for Texas, Austin, Schmitz, and Wiliowwood Streets.
These projects are approved C.I.P. improvements and the bid
price is within engineering estimates,
~J1CI~BROIq Tabulation sheet
Public Utilities Board's Minutes 11/19/86
f R068AI S DEPARTIENT5 OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Utility Department Capital Improvements
FISCAL, IMPACT:
1986/87 Capital Improvement Program Funds
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd Y. Harrell
City Manager
7&red by:
Mama: Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Name: John J. Marshall, C.P.M.
7) !~O3 Purchasing Agent
t•
I I I I I 1 I I I } 1 }
fill 1 9611 1 ;ALVEAT I .LIE 1 RICKEASON I IN I CIRCLE C i MUM 1 1. MAY I m I NII"IN9 I ILL I JAV-LIAR I
111 111LE 80 CIF UTILITIES o!C "N" I PAVINTI I PENN ICON9TRUC1101h lCOVIOXTINl1 ICB11111MCTION ICON IMKIION lCONSINK11011 IC1NBiRII III I MM"NE
I NElow I COW. '
OPENEO 11113186 2i" P.N, I COIN' fCON91AKTISN I CO. I I CO. I Co. I CO. I cl I SERVICE I I I
ACCOMIll I I 1 1 f { } } I I i
I I I t I I I 1 1 I I ~
...............................!-------------1-------------I---.-..-..---I-------------3-------------t-------•-----I----••-------
I I ITV I ITER KIKRIFTION I VEM10R I VENDOR I VEROOR I VENDOR I VEN10R I VEMM I VIM" I VEtf1/R
I VEWA I VENDOR 1VEMIR f
_...1.._ -•I- - I------------- 1------------- 1------------- I------ I------------- 1------------- 1------------- I............. I............. 1-------------
I I I { I I I 1 I I I I 1 1
t. I ITEIAS 91, NATERLINE 1 4f,545,11 1 29,312.3f I 36,/if.00 t 421286.0 1 41 ,8154.1 I 36,277,5# 1 31,119.11? f 35,441.0 1
0,416.0 1 3405M.fNl 141,934.0 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 '
2, I IAUSTtN 91. NATERLINE f 125,442.0 1 0,917.9 1 115,213,15 I 148,667.64 1 1269122.51 1 113,103.11 1 111,211,11 1 I0,426.1111 1 1270182,61
1 113,791.11 1151,229.301
I I I I I I I I I I I = I }
3. 1 15CPAIll 91, NAURU* 1 11616,0 1 39169." 1 6106.11 I 9,"9.#4 i 1,91.01 I 6,111.#4 I 1,#43." i 1,/21,1 I 1,346,21
1 71#46,01 111,134.1'
I I I I 1 I f I I I i I I 1
4, 1 IN1LLOMMOOO 91, NATERLINE 1 43,413.1 1 32,643.111 1 39,111.58 I 51,6A31 1 41,8821.31 1 3794fN1.51 1 37,993.11 1 33,164,0 1
419651.32 1 34,623.0 1461613.11 1
f I f I 1 ! I t I I I I I !
5, I I TOTAL 1-4 1 218,146," 1 166,692," 1 111,173.23 1 256,111.36 1 21,673.0 1 1/0".1111 211,11.11 1 11,157,10 f 217,115.23 f
111,#41.11 1256,911,511
t I ! I I I ! 1 I 1 1 I I I
I I I 1 f I 1 1 I t } ~ ~
1 1 818 8011 I TED I YE9 I no I its I MEI I ml I us I I" 1 YE1 I no 1 0 1
f 1 f ! I 1 I ! I I I i t }
I I ! f 1 I r 1 I I 1 I I 1
I I 1 I I ! ! f I 1 I I ! f
r I 1 ! I f I I I t I ! I I
?[MT-s srin .-3^.,ru +g°ss+rs _ .i
MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOAR ID
November 19, 1986
MENDERS PRES MT: Chairman Roland Laney, John Thompson, Edward
Coomss, Kenneth Frady, Lloyd Harrell, R. E.
Nelson
ABSENT EXCUSED: Nancy Boyd
STAFF PkbShNT: C. David HAS, Ernie Tullos, John NcGrane,
Glenn Jaspers
OTHERS PRESENT: Tim Fisher, George Arthur et al
City Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. to 9:1S p.m.
Page 2
3, 40NSIDhR FINAL PAYN13NT TO BARRETT COMMERCIAL BUILDERS FOR
z .
Tullos explained that the work had been inspected and
accepted by the staff. The staff was recommending approval
of the tinal payment.
(:Oomes moved approval of the final payment to Barrett
Commercial Builders Thompson second. All ayes, no nays,
motion carried unanimously.
4. CONS DER bID OPbNING BID 09631 FOR UVhR5IZE SEWER LIMB AT
M Ham explained that the stay recommends approval of the
•
lowest cost difterence of $SO,B14.11 as the City's par-
i. r^7 tfcipatton for the oversized sewer line from 10 Inches to
18 Inches,
Accordtn to Ham, the City Council approved the oversize
N agreement August 2S, 1986. The proposed development re-
quires a l0" sewer line, whereas the anticipated growth in
the surrounding drainage areas requires 18" sewer line.
'A- Approximately 5,015 LF of 18" seksr IIhe will be installed.
GJ .n
Thompson moved approval of the lowest cost difference of
$30,814.11 submitted by Dickerson Construction. Frady
second. All ayes, no nays, motion carried unanimously.
5 SAN WE y~OPhN ING. BID r9660i_FOR hAbl h Uk! VB RhL lhF
Ham requested that this item be pulled pending submission
of new bids, '
6. CU 5IL BID OPE W%1,11111190,70, FOR Tb S AUSTIN, SCHMITZ
w ,
Has explained ,hat the staff recommend award of the low bid
of Joe bensou Construction in the amount of $156,692,00
According to Ham, these are approved CIP improvements,
Thompson moved t9 recommend approval to the City CcLuncfl of
the low bid of Joe Benson Construction in the amount of
$1$6,692.00. Frady second. All ayes, no nays, motion
carried unanimously,
Y
M.
17
"s s
I
N0.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW
EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain
contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an
amount exceeding $10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the
case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at
once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the
citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is
necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the
city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property,
machinery or equipment; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$10,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires gnat
every act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW9 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby determines that there is a
public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to
appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or
to preserve the property of the city, or tj protect the public
health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen
damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason
thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials,
equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase
orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
76529 Yang Laboratories. Inc. S ,2Q.$80.00
i
"a '9471F t~~' e 't'i#,`--; 'Tr' i~ t _T`^t ,l. "-i i ~jx: ♦ a '
? 1 y
SECTION II*
That because of such emergency, the City Manager or
designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the
materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the
attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the
amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in
accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such
purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 9 _ day of December 1986.
RAY STEPRENS9 MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
ALLEN, CRULOTTE CITY SECRITXAT
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE Two
v t =rte Tr?f„ '"F,T i."^~'e""f':v ~rc;-,;,yrs-a F 1*`y9;
DATE: December 9,1986
CITY MWILAW
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell. City Manager
SWECT: PURCHASE ORDER / 76529 - NAN6 LABORATORIES
C li ITIOII: We recommend this purchase order to Wang Laboratories
in to amount of $20,880.00 be approved for payment.
Slion This purchase order is for the annual maintenance
r'>IeVvi a on the Wang processing hardware and software in the
Word Processing Center. This contract will be in effect from
October 1, 1986 through September 30, 1987 and includes all
repair service and software upgrades.
BACKGROUND: Purchase Order 76529
Wang Invoice OU141682
PROGRAMS. DEPARTIiE,lITS OR OROUPS AFFECTED:
Word Processing Center
FISCAL IMPACT:
1986/87 Budget Funds ACCTN 100-036-0006-8341
Respectfully submitted:
Lloyd V, Harrell
City Manager
Poi ared by:
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Joan J. Marshall, C.P.M.
T10t; Purchasing Agent
- -
mono
n;,.
"`iR
901.8 TEXAS STREET KM ORDER
DIRStTQN, TX 76401
P.Q. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCr1MENT TYi
r.
7662 9 1112610,06 $ to
WAN49000
VENDOR SHIP TOc
WhNG LABORYTIRS• INC*
POO• BOX 9111519?
04LLAS9 TX 75288
_ ao~ReP. 6
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOUN
01 too 036 0006 8341 1 WANG SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 20 r 8800 00
he Citx of Denton, Texas is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20, o. 209000000
eference P.O. Number on all B/L,Shlpments and Invoices i
hlpments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. By sn~:l
Send Invoices TO: Direct Inquiries TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent
216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
(or as Indicated on Purchase Order) 617/666.63`11 D/FW Metro 2670042
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
i
7? ?F7; Tr
7X Um
ORIGINAL INVOICE - MAINTENANCE
91621 09/18/86 =09/24 /36 OU141"2
rNoplo Po 12/12/83
2
049033
SOLD CITY OF DENTON
To ATTNI MANY AAMSEY 10/01/86 09/30/37
213 E MCKINHEY ST
DE1fT0li Tx 76201 NET 30 DAYS
mmm gym
tNVALLOD 'CITY OF DENTON
MAINTENANCE '
At ATTHS MARY RAMSEY
215 MCKINNEY ST 31LLING ONLY
DENTON Tx 76201 Jill,
10101196 TKRU
AN
REST PREPAID START 10-Q1-86 ABF 717LH, 78
31010
um MODfL
NOt; NUtN ; Otl$QNSMTIpN / OtLL. AWNTNLY
MO OTY : P@gC0 AMOt1NT
x ;
6340 Y2067 SERIAL NU
5577 24312
5505-3 MASTER H7879
5506-2 F8224 K81613 01658 K31783 K31792
32227 KS1778 MZ3061 NLOO22 NL3695
AWS-4 MASTER IR6149 IR7961 LE7101 LE7463 LW2676
W2677 LW2679 LW2680 MY2463
6381W 1303 KK1304 01303 KF2205 LD1013
6581WC 29566
6581WR 6371
TSF-31 P2974 L01331 MG0725
5536=4_._ 4004 -KM6225-M6268'KM6293
6340-45 MASTER 51390
6540-3 DISK 491
6565 IN518O
6300-OIS-64 7399
****'t****** COMMENTS
EF 717ZH, 783H3,
86D53~,266G79CAo 175HDo 176HD, 751MV
y~AAlf gor~resppo~nAdonar Owuid refonome Invoke "mbar. Direct all Inqulm to: WJWWAL ,
qE North 3lroot iw~gMwY, MA 01871 SAL= TAX
TEL: 0'17-000-OW76 NIN11f0mw
NE! TOTAL ,
±Oam-1016 2 0492 0-10-12 0 04M 192 MOO 2. OF 3
ri ?^a rs.c` ,:TZ s r F^,- >a ~'A.. -s ;Rwq' L~ y:?ra w. ,F,. c-rf°?Y.r:3yr` c
ha~`,r rAr .
OJ►LRAf. YX. 7M
ORIGINAL INVOICE - MAINTENANCE
AM NMI 1, NA, 3 11m
No PO 12/12/65 916ZR 09/18/86 09/24/86 OU141682
049033
801.0 CITY OF DENTON
TO ATM MARY RAMSEY 10/01/86 09/30/87
215 E MCKINNEY ST
DENTON TX 76201 NET 30 DAYS
TYR.
11STALLED 'CITY OF DENTON MAINTENANCE
AT ATTN: MARY RAMSEY
215 E MCKINNEY ST BILLING ONLY
DENTON TX 76201
13701786 T1UW
ANNUAL
1
REST PREPAID START 10-01-86 REF
717zH9 783HJ,
UNE MODEL . " / . " MONTHLY.
Mo.
bafo: NUQNLR . " b~t~11I~fIDN
6340 11 LA . D N 14 RAP
5577 192-40 CPS RIGA DENSITY MATRIX 12 1 56.0 672.00
5505-3 P SYSTEM 5 MODEL 3 MASTER, 12 1 SO. 600.00
CONSISTING OF:
5505-3 MASTER I MASTER FOR 5505-3 SYSTEM
5506-2 10 WORKSTATION
AWS-4 4K ARCH WKST W-STAND KY6D 12 9 52. 5616.00
CONSISTING OF:
AWS-4 MASTER 9 ARCHIVING WORKSTATION MASTER
65811+ S CPS DAISY OUTPUT' PRINTER 12 3300.00
65SIRC S CPS WIDE CARR DAISY PRTR 12 1 55.0 660.00
63$1WR EMAN. 35 CPS DAISY OUTPUT 12 1 55. 660.00
TdF-31 IN SHUT FEEDER FOR 6581W 12 3 23. 828.00
SV36-4 4K (IT-KEYBOARD WORKSTATION 12 4 31. 1488.00
6540-3 IS 140 MODEL 3 MASTE1, 12 1 280. 3360.00
CONSISTING OF:
6540-45 MASTER 1 CPU W-DISKETTE
6540-3 DISK 1 PHOENIX DISK 80.4 MA +
6565 PTIONAL 275 M8 DISK DRIVE 12 1 266. 3192.00
6300-0I8-64 LECTRONICS FOR OIS GRAPHIC 12 1 21. 252.00
wAN wM *nc::0 Mind rofmn4 Involoo number. Direct ail Inquires to: IUMT"
i7i Nirth~ reM, t+wlrtwryr, MA 01876 SALES TAX
TEL! SGT-N1i-g7ti MM/MIIRI01"
M TOTAL
041 "ll - tftbe 2 0482 5-19-12 9 04m 192 tt9" 1 ~ R
uCffYO/ 01ffAON, TtX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / OENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (617) 666.6307
Odice of the City Afans"r
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATE: December 5, 1986
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION FOR THE AIRPORT
This item was placed on this agenda due to the Notice of
Intention to Issue the COs which we were required to publ!sh in
the newspaper. However, we are awaiting further information
from our tinanci.al advisors pprior to the actual issuance. As
some Council action will be required on December 9, we
recommend that a motion for continuance to December 16 be
approved.
Thank you.
rQL~ 0C4-'1'
oOyOV. arre
ca
2481C
M E M' O
DATE: November 17, 1988
TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Robert Hagemann, Fire Marshal
i
SUBJECT: Ordinance of Firs, Code Update
We have chosen to present the Uniform Fire Code, 1985 Edition. This rdition of
the code will update the code that we ar3 currently using, the Uniform Fire Code,
1982 Edition. With this update the fire rode will be compatible 'with the Building
Code. The 1985 Code Update will help us to stay current as our City continues
to grow ,
Attached to this memo is an Ordinance Amending Chapter 10 of the Code of Ordin-
ances of the City of Denton, Texas, to provide for the adoption of the Uniform
Fire Code, 1985 Edition and Amendments.
R6bert ogemann
Fire Marshal
RH /ec
r ,
°iiz N --s-c;A, a ms~.':r
•
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 Of THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE
' UNIFORM FIRS CODE, 1915 EDITION PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS
THERETO; REPEALING CERTAIN PROVISI NS OF ARTICLE III OF SAID
ct,'ArTBR ABLATING TO THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE FIRE MARSHAL;
Risvi .LING THE PROV13IONS OF ARTICLE IV OF SAID CHAPTER RELATING
TO LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE IV ENTITLED
"ALARM SYSTEMS" TO PROVIDE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SMOKE
DETECTORS IN CERTAIN DWELLING UNITS; REPEALING ARTICLE IV
("BURNING OF TRASH AND RUBBISH RESTRICTED") OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM
AMOUNT OF $I,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A
SIVERABILITY CLAUSE; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSs
SECTION 1.
That Article I of Chapter 10 of the Code of Ordinances is
amended to read as follows:
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL
Section 10-1, Uniform Fire Code--Adopted.
There is hereby adopted by the City of Denton, Texas, for
the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions
hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion, that
certain Code and Standards known as the Uniform Fire Code,
including Appendices I through VI, inclusive, and the Uniform
Piro Code Standards published by the Western Piro Chiefs Asso-
ciation and the International Conference of Building Officials,
being particularly the 191S editions thereof s.nd the whole
thereof, save and except such portions as are hereinafter
deleted, modified or amended by Section 1.02 of this ordinance,
of which Code and Standards have been and are now filed in the
office of the City Secretary and the same are hereby adopted and
incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein, and from
the date on which this ordinance shall take effect, the
pprovisions thereof shall be controlling within the limits of the
City of Denton, and within 51000 feet thereof, where specified
therein.
Section 10-2. Amendments.
The Uniform Fire Code, adopted in Section 10-1, is hereby
amended as follows:
a, By the deletion of the following provisions:
1, Section 2.103, "Fire Prevention Bureau".
2. Section 2.104, "Fire Prevention Engineer or Fire
Marshal".
3. Section 71.103, "Bonds for Fireworks Display Required".
• b. By the addition thereto of Article IV of this Chapter.
c. 81 the amendment of the Uniform Fire Code as followss
•~,a. wiu.` t°`'T~^~~w: •;nv.F7-- `
w'r e
7k
.
(1) The amendment of Section 2.107, Right of BntrY, to
read as follows.
Sec. 2.107, h f Ent Whenever necessary to
make an lnspec op to ea once any of the provisions
of this Code, or whenever the chief or his authorised
representative has reasonable cause to believe that
there exists in any building or upon any premises any
condition which makes such building or premises un-
safe, the Chief or his authorised representative say
enter such building or promises at all reasonable
times to Inspect the same or to perform any duty lm-
posed upon the Chief by this Code. If such building
or premises be occupied, he shall first present proper
credential and demand entry, if such building or pre-
mises be unoccupied, he shall first make a reasonable,
effort to locate the owner or other persons having
charge or control of the building or premises and
demand entry. If such entry is refused, or, if no
owner or other person having charge or control of the
build in or the premises can be located, the Chief or
his authorised representative shall have recourse to
every remedy provided by law to secure entry.
"Authorized Representative" shall include the officers
named in Sections 2,105 and 2.106 of this Code.
(2) The amendment of Section 2.108, Liabilit for Damages,
by adding a second paragraph to rea3"as o ows:
All regulations provided in this Code are hereby
declared to be -governmental and for the benefit of
the general public. Any member of the City Council,
any City Official or employee, or any member of the
Building Code Board, charged with the enforcement of
this Code, acting for the City in the discharge of
his duties, shall not thereby render himself person-
ally liable, and he is hereby relieved from all
personal liability for any damage that may occur to
persons or property as a result of any act required
or permitted in the discharge of his duties. Any
suit brou ht against any such official or employee
because ofd such act performed by him In the enforce-
went of any provisions of this Code shall be defended
by the City of Denton through its designated attorney
until the final adjudication of the proceedings.
(S) The amendment of Section 2.201 (a), ns ection and
Unsafe Buildings, to read as follows:
(a) The Fire Marshal or his designated representative
shall inspect annually all buildings or premises
or portions thereof, used for of nonresidential
roup occupancies, including hotels and lodging
~out*$, as defined by the Uniform Building Code,
and at other times all other buildings and pre-
mises as may be necessary, including such other
hazards or appliances as the Chief may designate,
for the purpose of ascertaining and causing to be
corrected any conditions which would reasonably
tend to cause fire or contribute to its spread
or any violation of the purpose or provisions 01
this Code and of any other law or standard
affecting fire safety.
FACE 2
i
° ~rsz`+' ms~ez'r,y~..`:"-'4:~ z Sr . :,_t .m, ~s~r..~g v • ` f*t 'r e
s
F F-7
(4) The amendment of the last sentence of Section 2.201
(b), Inspection and Unsafe Buildints, to read as
ollows:
All such unsafe buildings are hereby declared to be
public nuisances and shall be abated by repair,
rehabilitation, demolition, or removal in accordance
with the procedure specified in the "Minimum Housing
and Building Standards Code" of the City of Denton.
(5) The amendment of Section 2,3020 Board of Appeals, to
read as follows:
Sac. 2.301. ADneal_,s to_ by Idiot Code Board. In
order to deters me t He su a t-ity oof t*rnste
materials and type of construction and to provide for
reasonable interpretations of the provisions of this
Code, the Building Code Board as created and or``anized
under the Buildings Chapter of the Code of Ordi.ances
shall pass upon all pertinent matters. Whenever the
Fire Marshal disapproves an application or refuses a
permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the
provisions of this Code do not apply or that the true
intent and meaning of the Code have been wrongly
misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant
may appeal from the decision of the Fire Marshal to
said Board within thirty (10) days from the date of
the decision appealed.
In addition to such board , the Fire Marshal may
request that additional members be appointed for a
sppecific ruling' or interpretation. Such members
shall be voting, ex-officio members and appointed by
the Chairman o;f •the Building Code Board to assist in
the determination and /or ruling of a specific issue
or case, Such appointment shall be temporary until
the ruling is rendered. No more than two (1) members
shall be appointed at such time, each having exper-
tise In the matter of question. The Board shall adopt
reasonable rules and regulations for conducting its
investigations and shall render ■ll decisions and
findings in writing to the Fire Marshal with a dupli-
cate copy to the appellant and may recommend to the
City Council such new legislation as is consistent
therewith.
(6) The amendment of Section 3,1010 Unlawful Continuance
of Fire Hazard, to read as follows:
Sec. 3.101. Unlawful Continuance of Fire Hstsrd.
(a) Any person operating or maintaining any occu-
pancy, premises or vehicle subject to this Code
who shall permit any fire hazard to exist on
premises under his control or who shad fail to
take immediate action to abate a fire hazard when
ordered or notified to do so by the Chief or his
duly authorized representative shall be guilty of
a separate offense for each and every day or
portion thereof during which any violation of any
of the provisions of this Code is committed or
continued. A person convicted of a violation of
any provision of this Code shall be guilty of an
offense punishable by a fine not to exceed one
thousand dollars (;1,(100.00).
PAGE 3
. "z ?,~;?..ti :~y':S t :e !"i~4.~ -e":`uy {,~o'r.'~y>w.s"'3•.7 ~',x ~r'» 5 .a. '7'~w.rv a...~~~rw,+-.+s.r.
(b) When any vehicle is found in violation of any
provision of this codes such fact shall consti.
tuts prism facle proof tkat the person in whose
name said vehicle is registered is guilty of a
violation of this Code.
(7) The amendment of Section 4.1011 Permit Rogul rod. by
adding a new provision to read as FoTlowss
40. A omat! F e Al rm at c it Bxt s -
lag s s n a em o aea ,
cons rue , ■ y ar reconstruct any 'autog& tic
fire alarm system, automatic tire extinguishing
system or standpipe system; provided however that
the permit required herein shall not apply to the
installation of smoke detectors in "dwelling
units" as defined by Article IV of this chapter.
(a) That the definition of "Bureau of Fire Prevention"
contained In Section 9.104 is amended to read as
follows:
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION is the Office of City
Fire Marshal.
(9) That the definition of "Chief or Chief of the Fire
Department" contained In Section 9.105 is amended to
read as follows:
CHIEF OR CHIEF OF THE FIRS DEPARTMENT is the Chief
of the Fire Department or the City Fire harshal.
(10) That the definition of "Jurisdiction" contained in
Section 4.112 is amended to read as follows:
JURISDICTION is the City of Denton, Texas.
(11) The amendment of Section 10,107, Fire Apparatus and
Access koads, (a) to read as follows,
(a) General. Fire apparatus access roads shall be
prov ed and maintained in accordance with the
provisions of this se...,tion, which shall govern
and control over any other provision of any ordi-
nance relating to the same subject matter, to the
extent of any conflict thereof..
(12) The amendment of the first paragraph of Section 10.301
(c), Water Supply, to read as follows;
(c) Water Su 1 . An approved water supply capable of
supp y ng required firs flow for fire protection
she ? be provided to all premises upon which
buik legs or portions of buildings are hereafter
constructed. When any portion of the building
protected is -in excess of 300 feet from a water
supply on a public street there shall be provided,
when required by the Fire Marshal, on-site fire i'
hydrants and mains capable of supplying the re-
quirsd fire flow. The requirements of this Code
rolatin to water supply shall be in addition to
any other requirements rf any other ordinance
relating to water supply.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2.302
any appeal made from a determination of the fire
PA02 4
t..
01
7, J_
C'
Narshal under this section of the minimum water
supply required for a pr osed development, plat,
plan or rapist submitted for approval pursuant to
the provisions of the Denton Development Code,
shall be made in accordance with the provisions
4 and procedures of the Denton Development Code.
(13) The amendment of Section 71.102, Permit f r Manu-
facturins, Sale and Dischar~, to :ea as o owes
(a) Sxcept as hereinafter provided, it shall be
unlawful for any person to possess, store, to
offer for sale, expose for sale, store, sell at
retail, ■anufactura, or use or explod4 any fire-
works within the City limits or within five
thousand feet (500001) thereof.
(b) A person may puke use of fireworks for the purpose
of a public fireworks display upon the Issuance
of, and in accordance with, a permit issued for
such display pursuant to the provisions of article
S.43 of the Texas Insurance Code, as wended.
Section 10-3. Arson Reward.
The City will pay a reward of two hundred and fifty dollars
($250.00) cash to any person furnishing and providing the City
with information leading to the arrest and conviction of any
person for the offense of arson within the corporate limits of
the City.
Section 10-4. Fire Inspection and Permit Fees,
(a) Fire Safer Inspection Fees, The occupant, lessee or
person making use o any building or premises, or portion
thereof, required to be inspected annually, in accordance
with Section 2.201 (a) of this Code, as amended, shall be
charged, and pay within thirty (30) days of being billed
therefor, as a condittun to continued lawful occupancy of
the building or premises required to be inspected, a fire
safety inspection fee based upon the amount of Interior
square footage of the building leased, occupied or used
by such person. The fee shall be charged no 2oore than
once per year for each building inspected, re~ardless of
the number of Inspections or reinspections, and shall be
in an amount established, and as from time to time
amended by ordinance of the City Council, a copy of
which shall be on file with the City Secretary. Inspec-
tion fees for common areas of such buildings or premises
shall be charged to and paid by the owner in accordance
with the square footage inspected as provided for herein.
(b) Foes Imposed for P ■its Required b Article of the
U ifor re ny permit requ • y c e e
Uniform re code, as amended harming shall be Issued only upon
payment of a permit fee in an emount established, and as from
time to time amended, by ordinance adopted by the City Council, a
copy of which shall be kept on file with the City Secretary.
Sections 10-5-•10-17. Reserved.
sac Ion II.
That Section 10-33 of Article III of Chapter 10 of the Code
of Ordinances is amended to read as follows:
FAGB 5
*Tv ='#r`-. *~`'R''ayt~.s~.n°?~rx~~A.:: t.h F.v-.w. y~.,ry n~~ >ye+e,_. r^ay wr . a€ r"-+1¢a. s.r°€~.'r?E!Fr 'i
Section 10.33. Duties of fire Marshal.
The Fire Marshal shall have the primary duty of administering
and enforcing the Uniform Fire Code.
SECTION Ill..
' That the provisions of Sections 10-34 through 10-43 of
Article Ill of Chapter 10 of the Code of Ordinances ore repealed.
SECTION IV.
That the provisions of Article IV of Chapter 10 of the Code
of Ordinances are repealed.
S CTIOM V.
That there is enacted a new Article IV of Chapter 10 of the
Code of Ordinances to read as followss
ARTICLE IV. ALARM SYSTEMS
Sec. 10-S4. Definitions
(1) Sodr om means any room which is designed with the intent
at t be used for sleeping purposes.
(2) oxri or means a passage which connect] parts of the
dwelling unit.
(3) Dweilin Unit means a hose, mobile home, duplex unit,
apartment Unit, condominium unit, or any dwelling unit
in a multi-unit residential structure. It also means
one or more roots which are subject to a single rental
agreement and which are rented to a tenant or tenants
for use by persons as a permanent residence.
(4) Landlord mesas the owner, lessor, or sublessor of a
dwelling unit. A managing agent or leasing agent,
whether residing or officing on-site or off-site, shall
be considered the agent of the landlord for purposes of
notice and other communications required or allowed
under this article. Otherwise, a manager or agent of
the landlord shall be considered a landlord under this
article only if the manager or agent purports to be the
owner, lessor, or sublessor in the rental agreement.
(5) Smoke Detector means a device which is (1) designed to
std-' ect visible or invisible products of combustion, (2)
designed with an alarm audible to the bedrooms it ser-
vices, (3) powered by either battery, alternating cur-
rent, or other power source, (4) tested and listed for
use as a smoke detector by Underwriters Laboratories,
Inc., Factory Mutual Research Corporation, or United
States Testing Company, Inc., and (S) in good working
order.
(6) Te ant means any person whc is entitled to occupy a
we ng unit to the exclusion of others and who is
obligated to pay rent for the dwel?,ins unit under a
written or oral rental agreement.
(7) 1!9%,o Smoke Detector moans the performance of the act
or a4 ceof manufacturer of a smoke: detector
recommends for that particular model of smoke detector
as a simple test of whether 1)r not the smoke detector is
in good working order.
PAGB 6
S'ry
T
P
a n y
tit.... , . - a ~f' i
''b K+ ` r s' n v`i°'R 'F'#r;Zc s..s 'r , a` iT` a p*3j.rrr eaaT'.°4 v X 7
. "n ^ Y=
.
(8) Units Con u ted After a tember 2 1081 ■esaa any unit
R OF a u a e• as saue after September
w4ich9B iii occupied as buildi a resi pdence for I the d ti o time
after September 10 I981.
• (9) Un s Co OR e ed on o foe a be 1 98 mesas
aA un o W MI a u a8 per-M-17 was saue on or
before September 1 19810 or which was occupied as a
residence for the first time on or before that date.
Sec. io-SS. Duty to Install Smoke Detectors in Certain Dwell-
ing Units
(a) New units constructed after September 1, 19819 at least
one smoke detector shall be installed by the landlord
outside of each separate bedroom in the Immediate
vicinity of the bedroom, except that:
(1) where the dwelling unit is designed with the intent
that a single multi-purpose room be used for dining,
living, and sleeping purposes, the smoke detector
shall be located inside the room rather than outside;
(2) where the bedrooms ore served by the same corridor,
at least one smoke detector shall be installed in
the corridor In the immediate vicinity of the bed-
rooms; and
(S) where one or more bedrooms are located on a level
above the cooking and living area, the smoke detector
for the bedrooms shall be placed at the center of
the telling directly above the top of the stairway.
(b) A smoke detector required by this section shall be in-
stalled prior to commencement of possession of the dwelf-
Ing unit by the tenant in accordance with manufacturer's
recommended procedures, subject to the following:
(1) a smoke detector shall be Installed on a ceiling or
wall;
(2) if installed on a ceiling, the smoke alarm shall be
installed no closer than six inches to a wall;
(3) if installed on a wall, the smoke detector shall be
installed no Closer than 6 inches to the ceiling and
no farther than 12 inches from the telling;
(4) a smoke detector may be located elsewhere if
permitted by the Building Code; end
(S) if a smoke detector is electrically operated rather
than battery operated, the power system and instal-
lation procedures for the snake detector shall comply
with the Building Code,
(b) 4iistiA Units. For all dwelling units constructed on
or before September 1, 1981, at least one smoke detector
shall be installed by the landlord is accordance with
subsection (a). A smoke detector required by this
subsection shall be installed In accordance with the
location and installation procedure requirements of
Subsection (a).,
PAGE 7
. k~ c ''y s'~.'.ar"~'JR:'~ ra ,1.-r~.^"v5'n r+6.. ;•::v.~'"a-;+ e r e w-c., rt!~: .4r^ .~~gwr -.s K € 'R''AR~ ?S' ..fir ~ °.~~F - ~
,
t~ n
SOC- 10.56. Duty to Inspect and Re~alr,
(a) Upon commencement of a tenant's possession of a dwelling
iinit containing a smoke detector, the landlord shall have
a duty to test the smoke detector to verify that it is
In good working order. Upon installation of a smoke
detector by a landlord after commencement of the tenant's
possession of a dwelling unit, the landlord shall have a
duty to test the smoke detector at that time to verify
that it is in good working order.
(b) During the term of the rental agreement or any renewal
or extension thereof, the landlord shall have a duty to
inspect and repair a smoke detector only if the tenant
has given notice to the landlord of a malfunction or made
a request to the landlord for inspection or repair. The
notice of the landlord need not be in writing unless
written notice is required In the written rental agree-
ment. The laodlard shall comply with the tenant's
request for inspection and repair within a reasonable
time, considering the availability of material, labor,
and utilities.
(c) A landlord shall not have a duty to inspect or repair a
smoke detector if the damage or malfunction is caused by
the tenant or the tenant's family, guests, or Invitees
during the term of the rental agreement or any renewal
or extension period of the rental agreement. provided,
however, a landlord shall have a duty to repair or
replace a smoke detector covered by this subsection if
the tenant pays is advance for the reasonable cost of
the repair or replacement, including labor, materials,
taxes, and overhead.,
• (d) A landlord shall have satisfied his duty to inspect or
repair a damaged o'r malfunctioning smoke detector if,
after a test of the smoke detector, a test indicates
that the smoke detector is in good working order.
Sec. 10-57.
(a) A erson commits an offense If as landlord of a dwelling
unit he:
(1) fails to install a smoke detector in cumpl.iance with
Section 10-55; or.
(2) fails to test or repair a smoke detector in
compliance with Section 10-56.
SECTION VI.
That the provisions of Article IV (Burning of Trash and
Rubbish Restricted) of Chapter 12 of the Code oil Ordinances are
repealed, said article being reserved for future use.
SECTION, VII_
That if any section, subsection, pare raph, sentouce, clause,
phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
person or circumstance to held invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordiaamee and the City Council of
the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted
such remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
PAGE g
_70k 77 MA : y _f` ~,iY+r
SECTION VIII.
That the repeal of any ordlnance or any portion thereof by
the ppreceding sections shall not offset or impair any act done
or right vested or accrued or any procsedias suit or prosecution
had or commenced In any cause before sua repeal shall take
• offsctt but every such act done, or right vssted or sccrued, or
pprocesdin s, suit or prosecution had or commeacod sksll remain
in full forco and affect to all intents or purposes as if such
ordinance or part thereof so repealed had remained in force.
SECTION IX.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance,
or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements
thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding
One Thousand Dollars ($1,00 .00), Bach such person shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or
portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is
committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such
violations such person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION X.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (11)
days from the data of its passage, and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of
the data of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
A , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,.TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORN:
DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Max 9
4
Yr
R y
I
N0.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE NUMBER OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO
BE EMPLOYED IN EACH CLASSIFIED POSITION IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
FOR THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That, until otherwise determined by the City Council, the
following number of persons shall be authorized to be employed
in each classified position in the Police Department:
1 CHIEF OF POLICE
3 DIVISION COMMANDERS
6 LIEUTENANTS
9 SERGEANTS
68 POLICE OFFICERS.
SECTION ON 11.
That 911 ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith are
repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
MOLUTTE ALLEN- CITY SECF1TW
CITY OF DBNTON,0TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
By
A
NC <iF V! M ja.n> Pfr`~E.. F_' ITS # P
FRI
7 '
\E ^a
WV2 4
C/rYOf DN lrTCW, rEX" MUNICIPAL WILDING ~ DENTON, r AGtfS 4817) 5"-M
MEMORANDUM
DATES November 21, 1986
TO: Charlotte Allen, City Secretary
PROM: Gary Matheson, L-vision Commander
SUBJECTs ordinance Amendment
Please place the attached ordinance amendment on the next council agenda.
This is necessary in order to reflect the addition of (1) one police officer
and (1) Police Sergeant position which were approved in this years budget.
i r___j
Gary Matheson
Division Commander, Police
£F .r TF * ] T.. ~ R"y' C7~°.@ , TF .4."7" r+F+P ';7A 4-• - -a t .qe t. sy wa~t.r~'' a
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Captain Gary Matheson
FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Ordinance Authorizing Classified Positions
DATE: November 13, 1986
Per your request of November 11, 1986, attached is a copy of the
above-referenced ordinance. Should you have any questions
relative to same, please advise.
TCR
DAD:js
xc: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
Attachment
{
t''~ ' ~..,-.c + -.r~ ,.mss _ r w r
3
DATI1 12/09/10
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 4 n
TO: Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTt ORDINANCE ADOPTION FOR 2-1813
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council approved this item at its meeting of August 5, 1986.
SUMMARYt
This was a request for a change in zoning from the commercial (C) and
office (0) districts to the planned development (PD) classification
and approval of the detailed site plan for that tract as well as the
existing 11.1 acre planned developments
BACKGROUND:
The detail plan is consistent with Zoning ordinance standards for
multi-family developments and the conditions of the original planned
development.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt
Not applicable,
FISCAL IMPACT.t
There is no impact on the general funds
Respect ly submitte04
L oyd rrslis
Prepared by: City Manager
.A1ddL 5 ~~L
Denise SpiQeyt!
Urban Planner
Appr ed
Jeff Mey+
Director of Planning
and Development
0374o
i
°d
f e
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS
SAID MAP APPLIES TO 9.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
AUDRA LANE, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WEST OF HIGHWAY LOOP 2889 AS IS
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN
ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM OFFICE "0" AND COMMERCIAL "C" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD"
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL
OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR 20.E ACRES OF LAND AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
$1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the zoning classification and use designation of 2.20
acres of real property, described as Tract II in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby
changed from Office 110" District Classification and Use designa-
tion to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use
designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas.
SECTION 11.
That the zoning classification and use designation of 7.18
acres of real property, described as Tract III in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby
changed from Commercial "C" District Classification and Use
designation to Planned Development "PD" District Classification
and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of
the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION III.
That the "Detailed Plan", attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and
incorporated herein by reference, for the 20.5 acres of real pro-
perty described in Exhibit "A", is approved and adopted as the
detailed plan for the property, in accordance with Article 11 of
Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, so that hereafter the
property shall be governed by, used and developed in accordance
with such plan.
SECTION IV.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 19690 as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Donton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, as amended, is
hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and
v
Use subject to the above conditions and specifications.
SECT
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability for particular o,!ses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION VI.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or
fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof,
or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand
Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a
separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during
which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued,
and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be
punished within the limits above.
SECTION VII.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton Texas within ten
~ ~ (10) days of the date of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
R STEP , MA
CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
77 MU"OPLEX ENMMUN IN0 COMPORATION
ii~r►~,r ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING •
SURVEYING
r~
fTANROAp "fYD" N e YATMANN. A.~., R►fr 1•r>A~IHOfNt
J.O.a► 7705.5
Ford Builders
24 October 1986
FIELD NOTES
Tract I
All that certain tract of aarcel of land situated In the MEp & PRR Co. Survey,
Abstract Number 927, Dontua County, Texas; said tract also being part of a tract
shown by deed to H.J. Hay's as recorded In Volume 1717, Page 406 of the Real
Property Records, Denton County, Texas, and being more fully describers as follows:
Beginning for the northwest corner of the tract being described herein ; said point
also being the northwest corner of sold Hayes tract, and In the center of Audra
Lane;
Thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes I I seconds East, along the north line of said
Hayes tact, and the center of sold Audra Lane, a distance of 279.01 feet to a point
for the :ortheast corner of the herein described tract;
Thence South 00 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds Nest, a distance of 9000 feet to an
ell corner of the herein described tract;
Thence South 89 degrees 12 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 220.12 feet to a
point for the northern southeast corner of the herein described tract; said point also
being an ell corner of said Hayes tract, and also being the northwest corner of a
tract shown by deed to North Texas Nursing Home of Denton, Inc, as recorded in
Volume 753, Pag•a 951 of the Denton County Deed Records;
Thence South 00 degri:cs 45 minutes 18 seconds West, along the western cast line of
said Hayes tract, and the west tine of sold Nursing Home tract, a distance of 470.08
feet to a point for the southeast corn'm of the herein described tract; said point also
being the southern southeast corner of suid Hayes tract, the southwest corner of said
Nursing Home tract, and also being In the north line of a tract shown by deed to
Channel Two Foundation, Inc, as recorded in Volume 1491, Pago 545 of the Denton
County Real Property Records;
Thence North 89 degrees 0 ^iinutes 41 seconds West, along the southernmost line of
said Hayes tract, and the north line of said Channel Two tract, a distance of 497.44
foot to a point for the southwest corner of the herein described tract; said point ni9o
being tho southwest corner of said Hayes tract, and the southeast corner of the
Audra Meadows Addition as shown of rooord In Cabinet E, Slide 371 of the Denton
County Plot Records;
Thence North 00 degrees 33 minutes 00 socohds East, along the west line of said
Hayes tract, and the east line of sold Audra Meadows Addition, a distance of
1372.50 feet to the Point of. Beginning and containing 11.17 acres of land.
11123 FORT WOAT'H ORVE • 0EN70N. TEXA>9 78205 • (9171383.14119 • K4ETRO X430-9eM2
am rM tjTH STEK vtON9 • SLATE 3M • t.EWOVK.LE., TEXAS 7W O-9 • W41221-9418
1 .1.F? i;~ L•~~fit ril~,~~r,.:~'~~7 fA' ,~a. , di. .•la i: ~i ~n~
W~t6~1i'i2. S.l., ti: ~L:~~.IZti.,. iLLl. t'- .;s~,iia~i3 ;•,Y
°.rw e•:., a4•`~Cg 'Tti x~af N s,. _ ..w ,4
Ma I1111QPLUX ONGINOWAINO CCAPOAAdn0N
tcNGNEEFUNG • L.ANO RLAI r$W-4Q • SURVEYING
OTANPOPM Hsu*" MAIJATMANN, P.m., RIM, Mwamew
J.O.► 7705,7
Ford Builders
24 October 1986
FIELD NOTES
Tract
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated In the MEP & PRR Co, Survey,
Abstract Number 927, Denton County, Texas; said tract also being part of a tract
shown by dead to B.). Hayes as recorded in Volume 1717, page 406 of the Real
Property Records, Denton County, Texas, and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning for the southeast corner of the tre.et being described herein; said point
also being the eastern southeast corner of said Hayes tract, the northeast corner of a
tract shown by deed to the North Texas Nursing Home of Denton, Inc, as recorded
in Volume 753, Page 951 of the Denton County Deed Records, and in the west right-
of-way line of Loop 288;
Thence North 89 degrees 11 minutes 02 seconds West, along the northern south line
of said Hayes tract, and the north line of said Nursing Home tract, a distance of
129.36 feet to an angle point;
Thence South 00 degrees 46 minutes 42 seconds East, a distance of 3.27 feet to an
angle point;
Thence North 89 degrees 12 minutes 54 seconds West, along the northern south line
of said Hayes tract, and the north line of said Nursing Home tract, passing at 358.44
feet the northwest corner of said Nursing Home tract, in all a total distance of
578.56 feet to a point for the southwest corner of the herein described tract;
Thence North 00 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 180.01 feet to a
point for the northwest corner of the herein described tract;
Thence South 89 degrees 12 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 425.03 feet to a
point for the northern northeast corner of the herein described tract;
Thence South 01 degrees 19 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 110.01 feet to a
point for an ell corner of the herein described tract,
Thence South 89 degrees 12 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 288.31 feet to a
point for the northern southeast corner of the herein described tract; said point also
being in the east line of said Hayes tract, and in the west right-of-way line of said
Loop 288;
Thence South 03 degrees 58 minutes 14 seconds West, along the east line of said
Hayes tract, and the west right-of-way line of said Loop 288, a distance of 66.91
Pert to the ?oint of Beginning and containing 2.20 acres of land.
1123 pMT WCMWrH C)mVe_ * 08WCIN, T6XAS 7ft2M • tOI713631410 + METRO 430-16M
=0 SMITH ®1 • sTE 30G • LEWtlVIL.t.1E, TEXAS 7t'K307 • 79"j"
Q@1-Q416
A
t
s~' "I",
r m~~ ~.S=9ii'n --•sw~sq sJ", .TSB. ~l Y, °...4."~ °n.a .k.'Fr. c[ln .'..jZ l°.
• lVlsiiitTliQ L K ■iA tNiisi~111M0 C0111111 MATMN
am ENGINEERNG • LANG aLANNIPI 3 • SURVEYNG
ATANROPM MUG" MAWPTMANNo PA., WIG, rg1laMMMV
J.O.M 7705.6
Ford Builders
24 October 1986
FIELD NOTES
Tract 111
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the MEP do PRR Co. Survey,
Abstract Number 927, Denton County, texas; said tract also being part of a tract
shown by deed to B.J. Hayes as recorded in Volume 1717, Pole 406 of the Real
Property Records, Denton County, Texas. and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning for the northwest corner of the tract being described herein, ;aid point
boars South 89 degrees 53 minutes I I seconds East, 279.01 feet from the northwest
corner of said Hayes tract, and also being in the center of Audra Lane;
Thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes It seconds East, along the north line of said
Hayes tract, and the center of said Audra Lane, a distance of 435.01 feat to a point
for thy- northeast corner of the herein described tract;
Thence South 01 degrees 19 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 729,98 feet to a
point for the southeast corner of the herein described tract;
Thence North 89 degrees 12 minutes $4 seconds West, a distance of 425.03 feet to a
point for the southwest corner of the herein described tract;
Thence North 00 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 724,89 fact to the
Point of Beginning and containing 7,18 acres of land.
9123 r-OA I WORTH ORIVE • OENTtSN, TEXAS 70205 • W71383-1418 • METRO 4317-1692
250 NTH STEMNIONS • BUTTE 300 • LEWOVA.LE. TEXAS 75087 • f~21.41 QQQi I.0418
4.,' '~°w.~;llfp..TCS']-,'*.3-`~,},~'.q.~~,"',°S3.r~`,' s'Lo :s"i aR.f,~.. .r «;~aa : ar•.+-rs;~~ ~a+rH..~~.-'m 'Tp` .k-r .y~y.'..
r' 2
EXHIBIT "B"
Detailed Plan for Audra Lane Apartments Consisting o£:
1. Planned Development Design Statement (3 pages);
2. Detailed Site Plan (1 page); and
3. Landscape Plan (1 page).
-1813
. 3^''g t ` f~ T. Ycf.._x Z-KV R~ -a' FTx' MM Ci! R~'4'-3~"'~:~'.... W ;~`.'~'E~ r`:~'.l~€ ~ •~X~°"}: tea ~.F
PD-7705
PLANNED D - noWVarr DBSIGN S'TATB M
or
AUDRA LANE APARTMENTS
1• State ant Of Insect
A. To develop an apartment community
district. as permitted by coning
Be Development and marketing con coincide with established and
future market damand. Construction to be accomplished by
phasing.
26 All tion to Coax°~~iVM
A detailed site plan of approved zoning districts located in a
low intensity area according to the City of Denton Development
Guide.
3. Ac-!
Phase I - 10.62 acres
Phase II - 9.93 acres
4. Land Use
A. Existing land use - agricultural. pasture -20,55 acres
Be Proposed land uses
Phase I - apartments - 10.62 acres
Phase II - apartments - 9.93 acres
50 Off-Site Info tion
As shown on the Detailed Site Plan
6. T of jig sn4 Tr r
As shown on the Detailed Site Plan
A. Projected amount of traffics
Phase I - 1.920 V.T.D.
sip
Phase II - 1.856 V.T.D.
Total - 39776 V.T.D.
000 0~
'r-"s=•e.w.'w€ ; `tea';?sTwy`'g `.~^+'r per;. «-c+rr,a~s':- a,a'° rr :v'te~t u-. q,',rxwr-"~ti;
} WPM
FL"
~I
f
7. 8ui
A. Location: As shown on the Detailed Site Plan
8. Maximum heights
4S-footo two-story
Co Minimum building setbackas
25 feet
D. Maximum total gross floor area:
Phase I - 191,528 S.F. - (including clubhouse)
Phase II - 191460 S.F.
S. Number of dwelling units and units per acre:
Phase I 240 dwelling units - 22.60 d.u./acre
Phase II -r 232 dwelling units - 23.36 d.u./acre
8o ftsiftntlil Subdivisiong
N,A.
9. Water and Draiaaae
As shown on Detailed Site Plan
10, Utilities
As shown on Detailed Site Plan
11. Trees
As shown on Detailed Site Plan. There are individual trees
located on the pro4arty with Oaks 3 inches in diameter or
greater. A majority can be saved with the land uses proposed.
12. fly"
As shown on Detailed Site Plan
Phase I - 37.75 - 4 acre open space, private
Phase II - 37.75 - 3.75 acre open space, private
13* kr.Lwinll
As shown on the Detailed Site Plan
•h' .'t it ci r7y
MV Vt -W-IIZ
"Rim
14* byAjopwnt-Sc had ttlo
A. Estimated start of construction: To commence upon approval
(1986)
Bo Estimated phasing as shown on the Detailed Site plan
Phase 1 1986-1987 Detailed Site Plan submitted this date
Phase 11 1988-1990 Detailed Site Plan submitted this date
t
I
• f % F , , Y1C1NS" NA/
1~ I .w ~ fsmlq weN
1
sC. ~ ' .K i ~ rw ss.
*+qw ..r
rw %W fr+
/ , + rr 1, M wr "am M eq+r •fw r M+•q MMMIM.
pp 1 r Y W M ft M Wu ■ fir 0►frr.
S, erNe fur$^ifso" freow ftm" . rrrrsre,e. qr.w.
W N memo w r f.r r.
.'y' qv, r• Mtlt MYw1! AIM mw 11. r It. om
+1... ~ . ~ ` ' ~ rrar wl NO rrrr w en+.ea tlYR . flr
11M0 UK uat ..r.
a
r0•R K1fe O.M. 6.Y./k
wig I le.619 !N !!.r 1
tl W+qM+ YYM . MI e M 1
f K 11 e. e>. m wx I i ,y 7 •e rrr rns W r r r r
y+ I werfr.Yr+. r M fr w
to+q n !ee sM r.n 1 w..u, e+ w w w r
e.e•rw. ~.r !
..r rn:an Il,fr er e..n y' 1
i +
J!!m I i
' r.o'~ A~ COMdi1T~Cti1
20N1N0 r . OgNSr~lllN . ftinrgYe .
'w..~,.~,_ ~.ni fr•rrfrf/Iq r.a q~sgr
be IqLp OVA:= UR PLO
It-ire
04W WW
t
\.A 7E
.r
a
I
~ " .rrl v ~.I .',r r",.[
n x;
v
i `
5i
40
,tr
r
Ti 1 !q I
ti
I
Cm .9
'J Jam. ' ,'J,~ { LRONNO
f SXISTINO Tpees
:y . .'c SHAOS B ORNAMSNy'A
Tpee•
SeASONAL COLOit
SHRUBS TVPICAL ON ALL $LOGS.
eVlrRORiRSNs
"NO SCARE PLAry
AUCRALANK APARTMENT8
rm-F W91 IL me
mw low
{e ~ `x : T.e s _''t~i R 3` yv- r. ae:. a , ix i 9~~y'3•"ps. _
NOS
AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS AS
DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas has
determined that the hereinafter described public streets are no
longer needed for public use; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HERESY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described publi streets are abandoned
and vacated as public streets as shown on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION II.
That said public streets are herein abandoned and vacated,
and by operation of law, the City of Denton's property interest
in said public titreets shall revert to the abutting property
owner, whether one or more, and the City of Denton hereby
releases any and all claims to the use of the property described'
in said easement referenced herein for the purposes therein
described.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall ~ecome effective immediately upon
its passag( and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
f~
ALLEN, CFRLOTTE l
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORbI:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS
F" Y
e"~,-.wz*s>.,,.r -•R3~~'•~w-°7!'rryva'C V%S[
EXHIBIT "A"
ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, U at: of Texas, and
bein part of the M. Forrest survey, Abst. No. 417, and more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the southwest corner of the tract being described
herein, said point bears south 87024123" east 259.131from the
northwest corner of a tract conveyed by deed to Tor Prouty,
Trustee recorded in Vol. 1666, Page 781, of the Deed Record: of
Denton County, Texas, said point also lying in the eastern
right-of-way line of a sixty foot (601) road dedicated to Dei►ton
County recorded in Vol. 213, Page 282 of the Deed Records of
Denton County, Texas;
THENCE north 43054133" east, along the east right-of-w+y of
said road, a distance of 37.83' to a point for a cornet, said
point being the southwest corner of a tract conveyed to PMK
Limited Partnership by deed recorded in Vol. 1630, Page 889;
THENCE south 8702S'S1" east, along the south boundary line of
said PMK tract, a distance of 2S09.88' to a point for a corner,
said point being the southeast corner of said PMK tract;
THENCE north 2016144" east along the east boundary line of
said PMK tract, passing at 658.80' the northeast corner of said
PMK tract, and cont'auing a tot*al distance of 668.28 to a point
for a corner, said point bein] ~*.he southwest corner,, of a tract
conveyed to Tor Prouty, Trustee by Deed Recorded in Vol. 17SS,
Page 49S of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE north 89059110" east, a distance of 93.42' to a point
for a cor;ter;
THENCE south 34002102" west, a distance, of 37.11' to a point
for a corner, said point being the northeast corner of a tract
conveyed to Tom Prouty, Trustee by deed recorded in Vol. 1770,
Page 404 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, said point
also being a U.S.,Povernrent Monument Number Q-311-W;
THENCE south 89059010" west, along the north boundary line
of said Prouty tract, a distance of S.61' to a point for a
corner;
THENCE north 5017024" east, a distance of S.6S' to a point
for a corner;
l 4t t ~ r i.;, t4 4. t t 3 f .S f r . 1v ~t
.1'ty.: 4r 'tt sls~ '.,.f;.~1~v;~:Md:.,~3vi.Li~._~~~•aCi 3'r '.1 i..
.«•yI~II .k... +y .x, y'Iy::.+tr^T.,',"y .trF, fs °9±`aa~: : ;i Yr n:r ,.z ~g _ ,T-}~ Fah{,4
°J
THENCE north 84049132" west, a distance of 40.24' to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 2039149" west, a distance of 264.28' to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 102514S" west, a distance of 58.50' to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 200139" west, a distance of 335,65' to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 87041136" west, a distance of 1195.97' to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 87050109" west, a distance of 196.75' to a point
for a corner;
THENCE south 202S146" west, a distance of 11.70' to a point
for a corner;
THENCE north 87024123" west, a distance of 1171.22' to the
place of beginning.
8
~r _ 1. 1 II , i
r~ivri:}3e:4V&.~''. r l
Planning and izoning Cumrission
November 12, 1986
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Denton Texas was held on Wednqsday, November 12 19860
At 5100 p.m., in the Council Chamber uF the municipal Bud ding.
Present: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr., Judd Holt,
Ivan Glasscock and Mliliar Kaman
Absent: Buline Bruck
Present from Staff: David Ellison, Sen'.or Planner; Denise Spivey,
Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Joe Morris,
Assistant City Attorney; Dave Ham, Director of Water/
Wastewater Utilities; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Ray
Rumfleld0 Civi1 Engineer; Martha Davidson, Pla,"ting
Technlcian; and Susan Mitchell, Secret
Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order.
1. MINUTES: it was moved byy Mr. Escue, seconded by Mr. Kamman
uWa-d7unimuusly carried (6.0) to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of October 190 1986.
II. C&2 TT AGENDA: It was moved by Hr, Escue, seconded by
Ms. u e ancT`unanimuusly carried (6.0) to approve the consent
agenda as follows:
A. Approval of final plat of the Gulden Triangle/Michael's
Addition, Lot 11 Block 1.
By 'tecummend approval of abandonwent of an unused portion
of Mills and Price roads located east of Trir:lty Road
and being part of the M. Purest Survey, Abstract No. 417.
C. Recummend apprutiul of abandunaent of a drainage easement
between Lots 16 and 17, Block E, Northwood Estates
Addition.
D. Recommend a royal of abandunaent and vacation of
certain utipp lity easements located within the Gazebo
Apartment cumplax.
E. Recommend am oval of abandunaent and vacation of
certain util~tyy easements located within Lot It
Block 40, Suuthridge East.
F. Recumwend appruval of abandonment of an easement
next to Paige Electric Substation.
111. PUBLIC HBARING
A. ;-1136. Petition of Dr. Bill Cudd requesting approval
u a etailed plan, including the preliminary pplat of
Nurthwuud Gardens Professionals Office Park, the prup-
erty is a 3.49 acre tract located at the northeast corner
of U,S, Highway 380 and Old North Road and is further de-
scribed as a tract in the Caewell Carter Survey, Abstract
275, and the R.B. Lungbuttum Survey, Abstract 775. The
pro party is tuned planned davalupmant fur uffice use and
the detailed plan provides Information concerning the
first phase of the development,
Nineteen notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; three reply forms were receive] in favur, one reply
fu."r waa received in opposition.
i
P 4 Z Minutes
Novomber 120 1984
Page 2
PS ITIONER: Roger Barrett Matroplex Engineerin Corvoru-
on, stated that the doceferatiun Iona on U,S, Highway
380 will be constructed in Phase I, He said that the two
story line has not changed and nu parking will be allowed
on the private drive thruuQh the canter of the pyroject.
tie said that they, have worked with the nalghborhoud to
eliminate the savers traffic problem at Old North Road and
U.S. Highway 380 and this develupment will help the situa-
tion. Ile sold that they ore propusing a 30 foot drainage
and landscape aasament, a six foot screening wail on north
yruyarty boundary In Phase I, large building setbacks, and
residential type architecture. He said that the project
is to have a residential typo feel and be as natural as
possible but still solve the drainage problem.
Mr. Holt asked if the street would connect to Mingo (load
in Phase I, Mr. Barrett stated that the street would not
connect to Mingo Road until Phase It. Mr. Holt asked how
many years before Phase 11. Dr. Bill Cudd said appruxi-
mately two years.
Greg Edwards, Matruplex Engineering Corporation, stated
that one of the very Important parts of this particular
development in regards to the odjecont pruperty owners and
this overall concept was the inclusion and committment to
solve a major drainage prublow, lie said that in the
planned daval4pment process they )An,,~~rr..~~ the opportunity to
create their own rules in davei ng the yruperty. He
said that they hove provided a drainage and landscape area
with extra width to provide fur drainage and landscaping
needs. He said that staff is concerned because the dra m-
agge cruss-section proposed dues nut meet the requirements
uf. the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations lit
that It dues not contain a 10 year st,)rm within the cun-
cretu lining. He said that they era proposing a concrete
trickle channel. He said that the tuj, width of the con-
crate Is 8 feat top to top, inside to inside and back to
back would be about 9 foot. He said basicallyy the depth
of the concrete of the channel is one foot. Ile said that
fur a 10 your storm it would be about 2 feat uver the con-
crate lining and for :Ldu l00 your storm it would be about
the same elevation of the city standards. fie said that
they felt the 8 feet channel would be adequate enough
fur the city equip}~aunt and wainte«anca. Ifs said that
either system wuuid provide flood protection within thu
easement with one foot of freeboard between all the exist-
ing huuses that are not within the floodpluin. Ha said
that landscaping is four times greater with the channel
they have proposed.
Mr. Claiborne asked how much water would the channel curry
uy to the top of the cutterete, Mr. Edwards said una-third
of a 10 year flood would be contained within the concrete
lining of the channel. Mr. Claiborne asked how much water
would the City of Denton standard channel carry in the
concrete lining. Mr, Edwards said a full 10 year storm.
Mr. Holt asked if there was a better chance of flooding
with the proposed drainage channel. Mr. Edwards said no.
IN FAM i Charles Mayfielde lives across the street from
1 0 vaiupment,' stated that they thought this area was
wing to fo like a park and than they start luukingg at an
8 foot drainage channel and feel like they ore being
taken advantage of. Ile said that if the proposed channel
bill hold the water and look residential, It Is what the
neighbors wan Ne stated that he felt the city standard
channel luuke5 like a giant skateboard park.
I
I
~MORREAU gU
1••f•e A0. I ' ~~i~
commuftity
~POCb«• 44 I
i. 'SHADY SHORE t
fig, $0 r
LOCATION MAP
y aap
60' R.O.W. DEDICATION to / '4 ow0e
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS K
Vd6me 213, Page 282 DR , PM
.r MILL8 ROAD
(NOT IN USE)
P
N 43064'33' E
37.83'
N 09424'23' W 2 9.13' 4S
x
Gum
s
N 87.24'23' W 11 %1,22'
29.42'
6W R.O.W. DEDICATION to
Gam, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
Volume 212, Pape 692 D.R.
Ocy'Ok
Issoo 624 0,1k.
0 Sol 91 i
00` dkoe 42l to
~S,E
a USe~°' ~~a
w
-too X666. P
15681,
No.
AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING A CERTAIN DRAINAGE BASEMENT
AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas has
determined th•±t the hereinafter described drainage easement is
no longer needed for public use; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Texas Revised
Civil Statutes, Article 5421c-12, an appraisal of the fair
market value of said easement has been obtained; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with state law, said easement is
being abandoned and vacated in consideration of the receipt of
their fair market value by the abutting property owner thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION _1_4
That the hereinafter described easement i.s abandoned and
vacated as an easement for drainage facilities:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and
being part of the C. Carter Survey, Abstract No, 275, and being
part of Lot No. 16, Block E of the Northwood. Estates Addition,
an addition to the City/County of Denton conveyed to Robert
Eugene Campbell and wife, Judith Gale Campbell by deed dated
August 30, 199S and recorded in Volume 1712, Pa a SSO of the
Deed Records of Trenton County, Texas, as more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Lot 16, Block B, same
being the southeast corner of Lot 17, Block E, said point lying
in the west right-of-way line of Craig Lane;
THENCE south along the east boundary line of said Lot 16, same
being the west right-of-way line of Craig Lane to the south
boun ary line of a 20 foot drainage easement for a corner;
THENCE west 20 feet south of and parallel with the north
boundary line of said Lot 16, same being south boundary line of
said Lot 17, to a point lying in the east boundary line of a 16
foot naAment for a corner;
THENCE north with the east boundary line of said 16 foot utility
easement to the north boundary line of said Lot 16, same being
the south boundary line of said Lot 17, for a corner;
THENCA east along said line to the place of beginning.
SECTION Il.
That said easement is herein abandoned and vacated, and by
operation of law, the City of Denton's property interest in said
easement shall revert to the abutting property owner, whether
one or more, and the City of Denton hereby releases any and all
claims to the use of the property described in said easement
referenced herein for the purposes therein described.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 198b.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF n6NTON, TEXAS
BY:
Planning and Zuaiag Cuswission
November 12, 1916
The rr ular meeting of the Planning and tuninl Comrlssion of thy
City u1 Denton Texas was hold on Node sday, November 12 1916,
at ;0 pose, In the Cuuncii Chamber u~ the Municipal Building.
Present; Bill Claiborne, Rubrr Cole, 1, 1. Blcue, Jr., Judd Hutt,
Ivan Glasscock and Millias Kaaman
Absent; Buline Bruck
Present from Staffs David Bllisun, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey,
Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, urban Planner; Joe Morris,
Assistant City Atturney,, Dave Haa, Director of Water/
Wastewater Utilities; Jerry Clark, City Bnglneer; Ray
RusfioldI Civil Engineer; Martha Dovidson, Planning
Te;hnician; and Susan Mitchell, Secretary
Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order.
1. MINUTES; It was suvod byy Mr. Escuo, socundod by Mr. Koasan
aand'VR'anlmuusly carried 16.0) to approve the ■inuteA of the
regular meeting of October 29, 1916.
11. ON-S p_ It was moved by ilr. EtCUe, seconded by
a. u e and unanimously carried (6.0) to approve the consent
agonda as fulluxs;
A. Approval of final flat of the Golden Triangle/Michael's
Additi.un, Lot 19 Bruck 1.
B. Recommend approval of abandunuont of an unused purtiun
of Mills and Price roads located east of Trinity Rudd
areJ being part of the M. Purest Survey, Abstract Nu. 417,
C. Rocummend approval of abandonaent of a drainage easement
between Lots 16 and 17, Block E, Northwood Estates
Addition,
D. Recuasmend r ruval of Mbandunment and vacation of
certain utility easements located within the Gdzabu
Apartment complex.
B. Recuwwond a ruvdl of abandonment and vacation of
certain utilityy odsements located within Lot 1,
Block 40, Suuthridgo Bast.
P. Rocumwend approval of abandonment of on easement
next to Palle Electric Substation,
III. ELI ~Aa
A, Petition of Dr. Bill Cudd rvquesting ppappruval
Northwoodi0nrdinsnOrvfe~siunrlsi~0 iceiPark, 7hutprup-
V n4; is a 3.49 acre tract located at the nurthwast corner
u 6'~.S. Highway 310 and Did North Road and is further de-
scribed as a tract in the Casweli Carter Survey, Abstract
275, and the R.B. Lungbuttua Survey, Abstract 775, The
property is zoned planned devolupment for office use and
the detailed }elan provides i.nfuraatiun concerning the
first phase ut the development.
Ninetee!s notices wore t,;ildd to property owners within 200
feet; three reply furors were received in favor, one reply
form was received in uppusitiun.
WINNE
P 8 Z Minutes
Noveal er 12, 1986
Page 2
~s Roger Barrett t Metruplex Engineerin Curyura-
33180 wi11 bedconstructedein1Phaseo1.1 He said.thatitheatwo
stony lime has nut changed and no parking will be allowed
on the private drive throlk the coat*( of the pyroject.
He said that they have worked with the net hburhood to
eliminate the severe traffic problem at 01 North Road and
U.S. Highway 310 and this development will help the situa-
tion. 1{e said that they are proposing a 30 foot drainage
and landscape easement, a six foot screening wall on north
pro arty boundary In Phase I
y y , large building setbacks, and
residential type architecture, He said that the project
is to have it residential type feel and be As natural as
possible but still solve the drainage ptublea.
Mr. Holt asked if the street would connect to Mingo Road
In Phase I. Hr. Barrett stated that the street would not
cunnact to Mingo Ruud until Phase It. Hr. Holt asked how
many years before Phase It. Dr. Bill Cudd said approxi-
watoly two years.
Greg Edwards, Matruylex Engineering Corporation, stated
that one of the very isyyurtant parts uE this particular
dovelupment in regards to the adjacent yropertpy owners anJ
this overall concept was the inclusion and committment to
solve it major drainage problem. He said that in the
planned devalupment process they hrtcr the opportunity to
create their own rules in dove pillns the property. Hn
said that they have provided a raina8e end landscape urea
with extra width to pruvide fur drmind r and landscapingp
needs, He said that stuff is concern"I because the draln-
a a cross-section pruposad dues not meet the requiraaants
u the Subdivision and Land 0ovvlupmont Re ulutiuns in
that it fuss not contain a 10 your stun w~thin the con-
crate lining. He said that they are proposing it concrete
trickle channel. No said that the top width of the con-
crate is / foot top to toy, inside to Inside and back to
back would be about 9 font. Hu said basicullyy thf! depth
of the concrete of the channel is one foot. fie said that
for a 10 year stunt It would be about 2 feet over the con-
crete lining and for a 100 yyear storm it would be about
the same elevAtlon of the city standards. He said that
they Cult the 8 fart wide channel would be adequate enough
for the city aquayyaent and mdintenance. He said that
either system would provide (loud prutectiun within the
easement with one fuot of frerbuard between all the exist-
ing houses that era not within the flood Iola. He said
that landscaping is foot- times graatsr with the channel
they have prupusad,
Me. Claiburne asked how much water would the channel carry
up to the top of the concrete. Mr, 3dwards said ono-t it'd
of a 10 your flood would be contained within the cuncrotd
lining of the channel, Mr. Claiborne asked how mutt; water
would the City of Denton standard channel carry in the
concrete lining. Mr. Edwards said a full 10 year storm.
Mr. Holt Asked if there was a batter chance of flooding
with the proposed drainage channel. Mr. Edwards said no.
tQ
IH V j Charles Mayfield -"lives aeruss the street from
` 1TV opaentj stated that they thought this area was
fwing to be like a park and then thenr start luukin at an
1 foot drainage channel and feel Lika they ore being
taken advantage of. He said that if the proposed Channel
will hold the water and look residential, it Is what the
neighbors want. He stated that he felt the city standard
channel looked Lika it giant skateboard park.
iy✓~ arlt Mtt A. , 4NyM
' • Y.e ' AM.w, i•At•n fA.,M r, a[rrC
V Vry~
' / * uldM J q '//~7~0/ Irrl : ~1:Ia ~ t1r N' 1Y 4. 1,w
/!1/I !!JO/ y.t•" +.w , tit. of r•+r, 'wA, At av
/
/vrn, N' 11' I?• t /1•Ir.ev M atf
1,011 42,111,
/ AQ MIM •n• 1 Ntirl
j ".w• t M^ M' n" t r All IO.1• s' 11
l17 t! 144 W m ilt•tt. 6,11,11,414,11, a 1N. r+Aa dNp / al
ell~) pn g, i/1 s1 IlftrN .rrld MI of S%, M NN N Of uM
/ I IV I f,
A
t'enc• i W 1t' As' t. rlt'A... M 'IF
1-77 / YI /ll rvvlt [••t•r:.. M tw rl.nl AIwI A .i
U'.ut rr. n' St tt "t to if /ol At lot n s
1.
J( p vannn S I 'ta Ir v r e4tnv/",
/ls7~
7/~ '•~r t M' IfY V1A dHtwn MfIK
i+;,- f Or try tT v. dl.lnrr of It
t //r+ rt 010
tvnee d d fs' tr' I/ . /Ittwrr M Ix
t //I 1 N N `nrrtn / 1!r It' 4)" t , of$~ n! !
LL I I T' i l ~S' i• Y e 4{41.044, II
dlflra A! It
LM t III ?7~Y•d f! ' y I1.. 60 4I Witt lot A li Wt
L101
tlrwt. II } tf t . elttwf N 1111111
It' 11' ! rlw t'IS tilt"
!/O ///J lr.N r%rt . altr f rover;
/U.
I' lIf I/ I/ 14,11 MI.t •11t• tn1.11. to flr yr[ .104• . elr
I f,4{ I.At to r -lot :•r A a IY li' Ir t A e1dWw H
W 11' 1))' v elw I r /III
Mr/h. r soo .
A w 11' v • fl tt.w. r1 M
the loft o1.. ttt
f 14{,41 fat M A r1A1 fM o e
riw O If o1w .M AIntlK
uwMrt of ~ntd Alnn 1+bnr Vl•Li1 1},If odnN.
~ fl tl 1 ~ r al r', rl•r~r.I at nr^ if n:nr nlur"
4q l! if 1 tl0 rtrg r f1. awh I1.'t 0.
j„t ~r ft 1 drlll.n. a....ti,o, oA M IN (1lr 41 ';nwh.
+1 . !f I ItrNP 1'N nnl.nn M Mt. MIYL ""I'
1 { t 0,/; t~ nll H II n Htl.. MIIII M M WO nr n
rlV MVI(f. .~Jf \ V H.1r/ 111 M Y/t +f Mry !u'I/I N. Ihl.r.-
! k1.1~~• _ ,I he dMttlrtl tr.,Alntr nAnnA M lflff l el Wu
+ 1 j~ ) ~t//~1 ~y 1 r' MHI •.t I'1 i4,. vrn IM fln}t V IMr.
}'AI r r r'1 ' V M.IrutLIMry.MAl/ueSIMl I., lu
Wt^r'1 rl 1'141 1Y, .1 1 "1 Mr lift s
` l r
n I , r HQ(f 1, //•je t f GµdM thl. ~~YY of
to &V 0
S t
14
r", ! 1 I r /f •
I Iht4 ~I II R!
L / , f IWI I'LL Ie4 iA of6I~ wt Mnlly, A Mr
I Irk RMIIP'M. b., tAa.w to o to Oil, jr I Y YMtl.t fM IkO to, IN 1,",
V.
vY'll "A" N9 11011 Or Arfltl, 11,11
~ f h Ir~ ~ / .fl ,//rrllfn/ft+~
~i ,t I / IJ } i1 t N'
C { 1 f 0`K lyelr
AL if d" If IA y !s II 1041 f ! / • It ~I~ /11~I
9 U ~ ~ h.dN~ir~l/ UL 114 M fill( Mall tttl
If I I/s I ~,r Al I, I'~Mlh "(W. do MIM cord"
n} • 1. th•I IN c",io. I.M~t6 ~ Ill.l.nn
lau-
k t• r 7 ttt~~1
Y
c'"I M ICfM
K"Ir Y., 14 uW,sr"W oftwitll h'rl
Wtl li/•14 1. x111, IAefo to r Of M 104 Aal
M 0441 'w Yf:.l•e km 1.r• IN IN AfMM
~~~I/4.-•.•. 11
iii••~~~~""" • ~ ~ Urtl V'Nl `t 11041{ kd 1W M M/ltl, eh1 R f r
/ rfY %n~ 4 j If
uf_
J !v /4?q,H' vnuyu
d/•1mo tell Ott a
_ al►4 .'1 im ' n!b/~rH/voov ES r<r rfJ Adar ON I.
WIN 10114111" 01E1-1100N, reXA
tic, ;.vc lAeYiNa, r~Xlas t.
_ ..ti'{ .nlt4)1f1~
~...-..e, r «t.:. Y . q:. n , _ ....,-rte _ . r.
DATE: *A~GM F 9 $ 8 6
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ORPINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY
EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN LOT It BLOCK 40 SOUTHRIDGE EAST, AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board at its meeting of October 22, 1986,
recommends approval of the Lot 1, Block 40 Southridge East
easement abandonment for the following reasons:
1. Builder wishes to build on part of easement. Because the
builder's lot is a corner lot, the front building line,
side building line and easement do take up a lot of space.
2. Since easement is for secondary service to only one
customer, feel ten (10) foot easement is adequate for
Electric Distribution.
3. No facilities are located in the six (6) foot section to
be quitclaimed.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUNDS
Easement was granted to provide service to next door neighbor.
Standard width of a utility easement is sixteen (16) feet.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMEN'T'S OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Ui.ility Department, Sammons Cable Televison, ,:nd
General Telephone Company
]Usement Abandonments
Southridge East
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Cost to process paperwork.
Respec lly Submitted:
Llo V. Harrell
A repared By: City Manager
B. Tu os
Director of Electric Utilities
Approved:
_~a
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
Attachments: I - Proposed ordinance
II - Location Map
III - PUB Minutes of 10/22/86
IV- P&Z Minutes of 11/12/86
1'$OIL
s
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING A CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENT
AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas has
determined that the hereinafter described utility easement is no
longer needed for public use; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Texas Revised
Civil Statutes, Article 5421c-12, an appraisal of the fair
market value of said easement has been obtained; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with state law, said easement is
being abandoned and vacated in consideration of the receipt of
their fair market value by the abutting property owner thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SBCTION I.
That the hereinafter described easement is abandoned and
vacated as an easement for public utilities:
ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and
being part of the John McGowan survey, Abst. No. 797, and being
part of Lot No. 1, Block 40, of the Southridge sst, Phase I
Addition, an addition to the City/County of Denton, and also
being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Interwest Savings
Association to Southridge Place Joint Venture by deed dated
6-01-84 and recorded in Volume 14189 Page 28S of the Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described
as follows:
BEING the west 6 feet of an existing 16 feet communications and
utility easement along the east 16 feet of said Lot 1 and Block
40.
SECTION II.
That said easement is herein abandoned and vacated, and by
operation of law, the City of Denton's property interest in said
easement shall revert to the abutting property owner, whether
one, or more, and the City of Dentor hereby releases any and all
claims to the use of the property described in said easement
referenced herein for the purposes therein described.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of r , 1986.
RAY STIPHEN59 MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CRARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECIRTM
CITY OF DENTON,OTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
•
.7:. -a 111 Mf
la qtr
e
!A
l
•
Lv a
•
~ ror~r r" ~ 1i `
Pro?osfd 40
be Abondonad
I
1 1
~ 1 r
. fir. kL
r
r
f
i
r
..v
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
MEETING OF OCTOBER 220 1986
7. CQNSI1LbK HDINANCB ABANDONING AND VACATING A CERTAIN
UTILITY bli N 1' LuLAThD A LOT Is O LM 0 i
AS DkLLAXING AN OFECTIVh N-11
Tullos explained that the alectric utility staff recommends
approval of this easement abandonment be^ause the builder
wishes to build on part of the easement. Sufficient space
(10 feet) will be left on the easement, and this is
Aa pnomtn for nlnctric distribution.
Page 5
Thompsvn roved to recommend approval of the easement
abandonment to the City Council. Frady second. All ayes,
no nays, motion carried unanimously.
Y
P 4 Z Minutes
k M November 12, 1986
Page 2
11. CONSENT A$BNDA: It was proved by Mr. Escue, se,.;ondec: by
sWi7c"ole 4nd unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the consent
agenda as-S ollows:
A. Approval of final plat of the Golden Triangle/Michael's
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
B. Recommend approval of abandonment of an unused portion
of Mills and Price roads located east of Trinity Road
and being part of the M. Forest Survey, Abstract No. 417.
C. Recommend approval of abandonment of a drainage easement
between Lots 16 and 17, Block B, Northwood Estates
Addition.
D. Recommend approval of abandonment and vacation of
certain utility easements located within the Gazebo
Apartment complex,
E. Recommend atp rovol of abandonment and vacation of
certain utility easements located within Lot 1,
Block 400 Southridge Bast.
F. Recommend approval of abandonment of an easement
next to Paige Electric Substation.
5 1
al
r, 1 ~
Y
DATE s * e 8 6
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TOs MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTs EASEMENT ABANDONMENT NEXT TO PAIGE ELECTRIC SUBSTATION
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board at its meeting of October 22, 1996,
recommends that the easement bo abandoned for the following
reasons:
1. Easement is no longer in use.
2. A promise was made to the owner of the property that aft9r
he granted the needed easement to 1-35, and the old
easement was no longer needed, the City of Denton would
abandon the old easement.
S►.'.4wy s
The easement being abandoned currently has no aul.ive City of
Denton utilities located in it. Originally, a sewer line was
in it, but it was relocated to a new easement.
BACKGROUNDr
The easement woe acquired to locate exit feeders from Paige
Electric Substation on 1-35. The reason the TMPA easement and
Paige Road were not used is that TP&L had an existing line on
Paige Road which would have required joint construction.
Construction would have been very difficult due to existing
facilities and street alignment. Width of Paige Road might
change in the future and require relocations.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton, City of Denton Municipal Utilities, and
R. J. Button#
To"
-.3
Easement Abandonments
Paige Electric Substation
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACTt
Cost to process paperwork.
Respectfully Submittedr
4LloV, Harrell
repared By: City Manager
Tu oa
Director of Electric Utilities
Approved:
R. E. Neison
Director of Utilities
Attachmentst I - Proposed Ordinance
II - Location Map
III - PUB Minutes of 10/22/86
IV- P$z Minutes of 11/12/86
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING A CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENT
AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WNBREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas has
determined that the hereinafter described utility easement is no
longer needed for public use; and
WHEREAS, In accordance with the provisions of Texas Revised
Civil Statutes, Article 5411c•12, an appraisal of the fair
market value of said easement has been obtained; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with state law, said easement is;
being abandoned and vacated in consideration of the receipt of
their fair market value by the abutting property owner thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION 1. t
That the hereinafter described easement is abandoned and
vacated as an easement for public utilitlesi
A 16 foot wide easement for the purpose of installing,
operating, maintaining and replacing if necessary sanitary sewer
lines on, under and across a certain tract of land in the MEP 4
PRA Company Survey, Abstract 9SO, end the Gideon Walker Survey,
Abstract 14300 In Denton County, Texas, said easement extending
from a tract deeded by the said Roy A. Bentleyr and wife, One
Frances Bentley to E. C. Potter, at al by deed dated November
169 1968, recorded in Volume 578, Page 347 of the Deed Records
of Denton County, Texas, southeasterly to the south boundary
line of the gentler tract, the center of said easement being
more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a fence line on the southeast line of the said
tract deeded to Potter, at al, at a point south 400031 west 8
feet from the eastern most corner of said Potter, et al tract;
THENCE south 48.30' east across the Bentley tract 40$.0 feet to
the south line of the Bentley tract In the middle of a public
road at a point approximately 780 feet west of the southeast
corner of the Bentley tract.
SECTION II.
That said easement is herein abandoned and vacated, and by
operation of law, the City of Denton's property interest in said
easement shall revert to the abutting property owner, whether
one or more, and the City of Denton hereby releases any and all
claims to the use of the property described in said easement
referenced herein for the purposes therein described.
SECTION 111.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED thla the day of 1906,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
t
i
CITY Of DENTON,tTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DE1lRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
syl W%*"
PAGE
•7 a y .FHj~T. m v~' c. 4 T^ % y - ~`..2.. M t _`~F .F T _ 'iS
s1 ♦ ♦ a it rte...
10
oe-le x r
M ,011110
A~
.00
10
/ k
/
s
.00
i ~y
00/ ti ~oe
Qom/
it
/000
4
r
010,
1 1
YMVx y♦ Yx~Y ~r~I
/ w•
10
A.
•'~~a .n. r 'z;^y. cseC~c'aSm +..~±1 S}A'• spa{}&N -~'~,4'... fy,~i
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
MEETING OF OCTOBER 220 1986
Be CONSIDER OKDINANCh ABANDONING AhD VACATING A CERTAIN
UTILITY EASE-AhNT LOCAThD N
Tullos explained that the electric utility staff recommends
Approval of this easement abandonment because the easement
is of no value to the City, and the owner wishes to clear
the title. The easement currently has no active City
utilities located there.
Thompson moved to recommend approval of the easement
abandonment to the City Council. Coomes second. All ayes,
no nays, motion carried unanimously.
P 4 Z Minutes
November 12, 1986
Page 2
IT. CONSENT AGENDA: It was moved by Mr. Escue, seconded by
s. Cole M unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the consent.
agenda as follows:
A. Approval of final plat of the Golden Triangle/Michael's
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
B. Recommend approval of abandonment of an unused portion
of Mills and Price roads located east of Trinity Road
and being part of the M. Forest Survey, Abstract No. 417.
C. Recommend approval of abandonment of a drainage easement
between Lots 16 and 17, Block E. Northwood Estates
Addition.
no Recommend approval of abandonment and vacation of
certain utility easements located within the Gazebo
Apartment complex.
E. Recommend approval of abandonment and vacation of
certain utility easements located within Lot 1,
Block 40, Southridge East*
F. Recommend approval of abandonment of an easement
next to Paige Electric Substati no
i
DATES Wh, 86
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TOr MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROMr Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS CONSIDER ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY
EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN THE GAZEBO APARTMENT COMPLEX AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board at its meeting of October 22, 1986,
recommends approval of the Gazebo Apartment Complex easement
abandonment for the following reasons:
1. Easement not in use.
2. Owner needs to clear title for sale since building is
located On top of easement.
3. To encourage individuals to dedicate easements in the
ftture for the utility system.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUNDt
The City of Denton previously required easements to locate
electric facilities in commercial/industrial developments.
This practice was discontinued five years ago by making owner
responsible for conduit.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS- OR GROUPS AFFECTEDs
Electric Utilities Only
''+`i'ix . ,s'.§vey3'.3:,, r tr . r::~•- : T? f a q <
F l 1 ~ - 1F Y A
Basement Abandonments
GAZebo Apartment Complex
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Cost to procesn paperwork,
Re full , ads
(//.J
8y: Lloyd V. Harrell
japarad
City Manager
B. Tullos
Director of Electric Utilities
Approveds
R. R. Nelson
Director of Utilities
Attachments I - Proposed Ordinance
II - Location Map
III - P M notes of 0 '2/86
IV-PAZ Minutes o 1 12/86
7'a@"3~^: rid ~`_.~r'.. '#+;C es rt,,~r~a:~e'X^`..~`n'~P.'S`i"."~~X "`""+'h;3'~-•
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING A CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENT
AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas has
determined that the hereinafter described utility easement is no
longer needed for public use; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Texas Revised
Civil Statutes, Article S421c-12, an appraisal of the fair
market value of said easement has been obtained; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with state law, said easement is
being abandoned and vacated in consideration of the receipt of
their fair market value by the abutting property owner thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described easement is abandoned and
vacated as an easement for public utilities as shown on Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 11.
That said easement is herein abandoned and vacated, and by
operation of law, the City of DentoAls property interest in said
easement shall revert to the abutting property owner, whether
one or more, and the City of Denton hereby releases any and all
claims to the use of the property described in said easement
referenced herein for the purposes therein described.
SECTION III$
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
,r `'a• ^'1 kr rt ~'E ? ^ , r. sin r~ yir -a. t > vk . yzva. z d" . i
P?gSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
oCHARLOTTE KLLENp CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CI'T'Y ATTORNEY
CITY OF DUNTON, TEXAS
Z) A
BY:
w-.7+#, °t_j r~•+{tw a 'xro ,ra~g`u"'°..rv .,k r+ -i!1x 98g+~n
7
EXHIBIT "A"
TRAM
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the William Loving Survey Abstract Number 759 in the
City of Denton, Denton County, Texas and being a part of the
called 3.140 acre tract described in the Deed from Joe Below and
Ernest P. Simpson to Gazebo Apartments, Ltd recorded in Volume
945, Page 461, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described
herein, at a point in the north line of a public utility
easement described in the deed from Joe A. Below and Ernest F.
Simpson to the City of Denton, recorded in Volume 836, Page 780,
of the said Deed Records, said point being south 89 degrees 40
minutes 40 seconds west a distance of 16 feet and south 00
degrees 41 minutes 18 seconds west a distance of 170 feot and
south 89 degrees 51 minutes 32 seconds west a distance of 12.40
feet from the northeast corner of the said easement, same being
. the northeast corner of the 3.140 acre tract;
THENCE south 00 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds east with the east
line of an apartment building part of the way, passing its
southeast corner, in all a total distance of 21.30 feet to a
point for the southeast corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE south 89 degrees 51 minutes 32 seconds west a distance of
2.14 feet to a point at a re-entrant corner of the said easement
for the southeast corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE north 00 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds west with the west
line of the said easement passin the south line of the said
apartment building a distance of 21.30 feet to a point at
another re-entrant corner of the said easement;
THENCE north 89 degrees Sl minutes 32 seconds east with the
north line of the said easement a distance of 2.14 feet to the
PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 46 square feet of land.
TRACT II.
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the William Loving survey Abstract Number 759 in the
City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being a part of the
called 3.140 acre tract described in the deed from Joe Below and
k . ~°5"+x4F.•-"a `s.M. aka p€ *•s^s?' t••£R°±.. RZO~„'V .'?„5rx r '4 ;:sT~-.c ,gym:-`•}v..s~ zr c xaky}~e
z
Ernest F. Simpson to Gazebo Apartments, Ltd recorded in Volume
945, Page 461, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and
being more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING for the most southerly southwest corner of the tract
being described herein at, a point in the west line of a public
utility easement described in the deed from Joe A. Below and
Ernest F. Simpson to the City of Denton recorded in Volume 836,
Page 780 of the said Deed Records, said point being north 00
degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds west a distance of 87.20 feet from
the most southerly southwest corner of the said easement, some
being a re-entrant corner of the said 3.140 acre tract;
THENCE north 00 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds west with the west
line of the said easement entering an apartment building a
distanco of 17.80 feet to a point at a re-entrant corn.)r of the
said easement;
THENCE south 89 degrees S1 minutes 32 seconds west a distance of
10.00 feet to a point at the most westerly southwest corner of
the said easement;
THENCE north 00 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds west with the west
line of the said easement a distance of 16.00 feet to a point at
the most westerly northwest corner of the said easement;
THENCE north 89 degrees 51 minutes 32 seconds east with the
north line of the said easement a distance of 13.70 feet to a
point north of the northeast corner of the said apartment
building, for the northeast corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE south 00 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds east with the east
line of the said apartment building a distance of 33.80 feet to
its southeast corner;
THENCE south 89 degrees Sl minutes 31 seconds west with the
south line of the said apartment building a distance of 3.70
feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 28S square feet of
land.
I
•
z ° r
R l.NRldt1r, •-«..•..~..w........w. ,Y At .t 91.1
l, Old
16 :1 0 oa, 40 t lot
A 1' ~:JLL ~ S : .
10,
Not
T rra '
7 ~ • r fr
• sf
• M .
f7
47 lot
44
M'i 1 t14.,0A1N0 4Ir,LrJ" 1!1
Y w
♦ r I Y 1 1/I
k
I'•~y ,.LAUNOAY +
ol-
'qq I O i
t v ~ r~ • f I
lop
O V~ ~1 I / M. 1ti,11 0' '
• CJLL J11.?I~ N
4•t r ar,,..e ~F+.. k of
8 p
J iSf>nQlr ~Ir • 19 f , r
•
+N r 7 ' • •
T Ir !
• , .
L.4 do
a / 1C ; .J
~,!•t
If
all.
. r v !e9 114! I =
if ARSS O MOL
RAN ) f ~ Q
~.~w • eP
•a. so4 Z Z •
iog` , • Z i 1 ,1 T
` M♦ I .
10
Ids.
M a'
Nf4N L... -Iefah hf' '
1 t t Ot• a• It w o.!' ~IRIY' f' • . ~
ALL •111)' Ot♦r♦♦•1 Frft •
HIGHLAND
IrfYtfflN rIN/M{T ;gNs,N p • • I V
rw. r ♦ L wrRwr le,l rar, e• nrRFf,t
• fal• tY.•e R.. ,.r.,111 pNtla 100-WMJM 1aN 001,
"t to" r..lrol,0 rrl, I.t.1 to tln
I"" of tl.• ,A bl , RorwMY1 t
ra• Ja► b Awbr rM o'roo,t ,I,qq„ hOT1 All of Pilo er41e011 $how* I'll •ilarll loaf C ' 1'•„
O FU F••• p" of tiro sale 1•.q 1Fp,e 0 to 40 910101 t1#60,09 I e♦ ar+na4 if Rlsnl •t•.tatf
Tart "a• 44 '*tow AM Malt! P. S1 014re Net. e0XIM041f1 04011 N4 4101104 1,011 t
7!/ Pow LfY H tlra 0414 F•M 1~•fq
Y114 A. MSw 4104 F""Cr F. 410/440 on
40 01 K the fat# 00" ea•a(rl•1
s r ,
}
I." 4d
~';{~~~$Fi~ _p.~[.n•;~ M ~ .4'n~,. d~'f~'r`s °e~y 9xlr Y`f'em,Wy; » .'ns 4 Tom, a~ t,~~~
4 I
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
MEETING OF OCTOBER 22P 1986
6. CONSIDER ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING A C#RTAIN
i ~y i (.A hU H H A b A Mh
CURPL
auo explained that the electric utility staff recommends
approval of this
• is of no value to the l,ity.
Thompson moved to recommend approval of the easement
abandonment to the City Council. Coomesrhse second, All ay est
no nays, motion carried unanimously.
required easements to ca electric f practice was
commercial/ industrial developments*
discontinued five years ago by making the owner responsib'.e
for the electric conduits.
r '~`7~~N ;ayraf`t..~""` * * %%a:+1~3 `e '~3 e~:T*mcF• ra•:~~'~~" . ,'7-3 ~ '4~ ~w3r'y~~' ` .
P 4 Z Minutes
November 12, 1986
Page 2
II. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Mr. Escue, seconded by
fps`` Zoo a an u~taralmously carried (6-0) to approve the consent
agenda as follows:
A. Approval of final plat of the Golden Triangle/Michaelts
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
B. Recommend approval of abandonment of an unused portion
of Mills and Price roads located east of Trinity Road
and being part of the M. Forest Survey, Abstract No. 417.
Co Recommend approval of abandonment of a drainage easement
between Lots 16 and 17, Block A, Northwood Estatbs
Addition.
D. Recommend approval of abandonment and vacation of
certain utility easements located within the Gazebo
Apartment complex.
E. Recommend approval of abandonment and vacation of
certain utility easements located within Lot 1,
• Block 40, Southridge East.
F. Recommend approval of abandonment of an easement
next to Paige Electric Substation,
1
p
,4 "i
7` f
, AB
FR ""`^}T AP
l
DATE *112/2/06
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell
SUBJECT: Farxii-Hop Resolution
RECOMMENDATION: The staff reoom w4s approval.
SUMMARY: This resolution affirms the Council's support
for services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN).
BACKGROUND: This resolution was prepared at the
request of Roberta Donsbach, Director of SPAN.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: No
other groups will be affected by this resolution.
.I
FISCAL IMPACT: T'here will be no impact on the
general fund.
k ,
Respectfully submitted:
' y
P pared by:
01
-
Ap oved:
i
1106 ~ 00
yawom, T"u 701
MEMORAN"
DAMk Deoember 50 1986
TO: Lloyd Farrell, City Manager
FROM: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning & Cxrm ity Development
Awl Resolution of support for SPAN
Roberta Dansbach requested the passage of this resolution.
it will be included in SPAN's application for Section 18, Rural
Transportation funding. The resolution will provide eviderre of
community support for SPAN. Funding allocated under Section 18
could be as much as $274,500.00 and will be used for operating
expenses and capital investnmzts. No additional funding is being
raquested from the city. The services tIAt will be provided by
SPAN utilizing the new funding will in no way adversely effect
their current service to the elderly of Denton.
J
p
1
~rai ' Q'i>SSAt~" fr3si
.r~~.`C+z.ai;Y6CxgyS~-Y'.
±+a~~.~7
~ M1 s
I643,
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N
WHEREAS, the Denton City council was instrumental in
bringing Services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN) into being in
February, 1974, in an effort to most the acute transportation
needs of elderly citizens of the City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, the Denton City Council, through the years, has
participated actively in shaping the scope of Services Program
for Aging Needs (SPAN) services to citizens of Denton; and
WHEREAS, after careful consideration, the SPAN Board of
Directors has submitted an application to extend its services to
enable persons of all ages to ride on established SPAN routes
throughout Denton County, through Section 19 of the United
States Department of Highways and Public Transportation; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I.
That the Denton City Council hereby affirms its support of
Services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN) application for Section
18 assistance.
SECTION II.
That this resolution shall be effective immediately after
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DMA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
1
BY: ~Lddl iw, J 01
3{M1b v>l.r .Js'•`;<ti ,.Ytir. ,i~ 1 (':ts, .ti. r
F w
DATE: 12/1/86
t>
CITY COUNCIL ANFORT FORMAT
T0; Mayor and Mewbers of the City Council
PROM: Lloyd V. Harrell
SUBJECT: Rental Rehabilitation Program Application Submission
RECOMMENDATION: Staff re=woxls approval
SUMM AR Y t The Planning Department through the Camxanity Development
Block Grant Officer request: this approval to submit an
application to the Texas Rental Rehabilitation program in
or& r to receive federal funding for Denton's Rental
Rehabilitation Program.
BACKGROUND; This program is currently set up with funding provided
fmn tl,o Texas Department of Community Affairs. The program
was funded for both the 1984 and 1985 years.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED;
The Co mnnity Development Block Grant Office will administer
the program. Building Inspection Office will be involved
in inspection of rehabilitated units.
FISCAL IMPACT: The C a=mity Development Block Grant office will
be used to administer the federal grant funding. The*q
will be no impact on the general fund.
i
Respectfully submitted;
Pre ared by:
Barbara Ross ►
i
Community Development Coordinator
Appr ve
q1ff l'~IAt .cM.GS V,
R S S 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, it is necessaryy for the Council of the City of
Denton to authorize the submission of an application to the
Texas Rental Rehabilitation Program Fund for federal funds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such
funds and desires to apply for federal funds administered by the
Texas Rental Rehabilitation Program Fund; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, as an entitlement City has
prepared a program for utilizing its share of the funl for
rehabilitation of privately owned rental property to be used
rimarily for residential rental purposes in the amount of
100,000; and
WHERBAS, the City of Denton desires these funds to support
the rehabilitation of privately owned rental property; NOW
THEREFORE$
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DBNTON:
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas
authorizes the City Manager to sign and submit to the Texas
Rental Rehabilitation Program Fund• a grant application and
appropriate assurances for entitlement funds under the Housing
and Community Development Act of 19740 as amended.
SECTION II.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas
authorizes the City Manager to handle all fiscal and
administrative matters related to the application and the
assurances required therefore.
SECTION 1114
That the City Secretary is hereby directed to forward a
certified copy of this Resolution to the Department of Housing
and Urban Development.
1, t. I:. 1 N~•
PASSED AND APPROVED this the , day of Docember, 198;
RXY r MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRET M
CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
J rF;}4
u J..`s'x#'¢S r' kFtil~.:e!i..la~,'~r,
1i ak • . grs.7R`Nr'. . `F::4.9` r r 1F , rt a ' .,-.T-+~
F L
R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, Chapter 271 of the Texas Election Coda authorizes
political subdivisions to conduct joint elections; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Denton Independent
School District have requested the City Council of the City of
Denton to conduct its regular election to be held April 4, 19870
jointly with the School District election; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, having given due deliberation to
the proposal for a joint election, is of the opinion that
designating common polling places for tho April 4, 1987 election
could adequately and conveniently serve the voters of the City
of Denton and facilitate the orderly conduct of such elections;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an agreement
between the City and the Denton Independent School District
providing for joint polling places in the 1987 regular municipal
election, a copy of such agreement being attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION II.
That this resolution shall take effect and be in full force
immediately upon its passage and approval.
RAY STEPHENS, R
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DE3RA ADANI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
i
1
'S +650L
THE STATE OF TEXAS S
COUNTY OF DENTON S AGREEMENT FOR CONDUCTING
JOINT ELECTION
This is an agreement by and between the City of Denton, Texas
(CITY), and the Denton Independent school District (SCHOOL).
WHEREAS, article 978b, Texas Revised Civil Statutes and
Chapter 271 of the Texas Election Code authorize cities and
school districts to conduct joint elections; and
WHEREAS, CITY and SCHOOL represent that they have each
adopted resolutions authorizing the terms of this agreement:
electionsTfor nofficeOrsLand ntheroi. shold teir ues Jointlyr ngeneral
4th, 1987. together oAApril
2) CITY and SCHOOL agree to jointly designate the same
polling places within the City. These polling places shall be:
a) American Legion Hall
629 Lakey Street
Denton, Texas
b) Fire Sta+ion No. 3
2110 Sherman Drive
Denton, Texas
c) North Lakes Recreation Center
2001 West Windsor Drive
Denton, Texas 76201
d) Denia Park Recreation Center
1001 Parvin
Denton, Texas
3) CITY and SCHOOL agree to designate the £o.1lowing polling
places for voters living within the School District but outside
the City:
a) Non-city voters in County Precincts 1R, 3B, 3D, and
3G: Dania Recreation Center
b) Non-city voters in County Precincts 1B, 1C, 2M, 4M and
4N: Fire Station 14o. 3, Sherman Drive
F
~ U N r t f. r°4' M Ll•.2I: . ~ ~1 r ly "Y i 4 ~k J` tia .e a+ ~ 1 q .S' t
~r
e) The CITY and SCHOOL will each provide their own separate
ballots, poll lists, tally sheets, returns and ballot boxes.
CITY and SCHOOL will each and separately post election orders and
public -election notices. Each entity will separately receive
applications for place on the ballot, assure eligibility to run
for office, draw for places on the ballot, prepare expenditure
and contribution reports, and handle other matters relating to
candidates.
S) CITY and SCHOOL agree to each separately appoint election
judges for all voting boxes located in the City at the polling
places specified in Section 2 hereof. Absentee voting shall be
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Texa;i
Election Code at the Office of the City Secretary at City Hall,
215 Bast McKinney, Denton, Texas. The parties agree that the
City Secretary shall be designated the joint absentee voting
clerk for absentee voting and one or more of the deputy absentee
voting clerks shall be designated by SCHOOL. School's regular
absentee voting clerk shall receive applications for absentee
ballots to be voted by mail and shall complete the remaining
procedures for absentee
voting by sail.
6) Each party shall be responsible for bearing the costs of
its election and for the tabulation of its own election results.
7) CITY agrees to provide space for absentee voting for
School District at the Municipal Building.
8) SCHOOL agrees to utilize the punch card voting system and
will secure the necessary equipment from the Denton County
Clerk's office and shall be responsible for any computer
programming related thereto.
9) CITY agrees to place signs at all polling places inside
the City on the day of election and to retrieve and store same
after the election. SCHOOL agrees to place County-owned voting
booths and other election materials at each voting box within the
Cite on election day. SCHOOL further agrees to return the booths
to the County after such election.
10) Should a run-off election be required, the party requiring
a run-off will be solely responsible for conducting such run-off
election.
11) Each party shall be responsible for any liability
resulting from its election should a recount be requested for the
City election, the City Secretary shall represent the City.
Should a recount be requested for the school election, the
Superintendent or his designee shall administer the recount on
behalf of SCHOOL.
PAGES 2
r
n., 6; • , 3; ;f':i , , b~ _ ~A~v~n~36~.i'r1f~"i`.1~4.'~~..!.tai:S~nL"s.,~,l l„ ~.t~C?'~ ,rrrx..x~5 ~
MV,
12) This agreement shall be effective upon approval of the
United States Attorney General pursuant to Section S of the
Voting Act.
EXECUTED this the day of~ , 2986.
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DENTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DISTRICT
BY: BY:
LLOYD V, HAKRELL CITY MOXG',At TWICROUCH, PRESIDENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE 3