HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-22-1986
A co dA
lob A)
Cif ~U~
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
. April 220 1986
Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesduy April 22 1986, at 6:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room
of the Tuniclpal building at which tho following items will be
considered;
6:00 p,m.
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
supplemental agreement between the City of Denton and
the City of Corinth. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
21 Consider approval of a designated voting representa-
tive to the General Assembly of the North Central
Texas Council of Governments,
3. Receive a report on annexation A-40, approximately
226,70 acres being part of the J. Ayers Survey,
Abstract 2; W. Burleson Survey, Abstract 93; J.
Burleson Survey, Abstract 91; S.M. Williams Survey,
Abstract 1282; J. Carter Survey, Abstract 237; W.
Pogue Survey, Abstract 1013; and the P. Jaime Survey,
Abstract 664, and beginning east of I-35 north and
continuing in an easterly and northeasterly direction
generally along Rector Road to a point approximately
2,500 feet west of FM 2164.
4. Receive a report on the Public Technology, Inc. fire
station location study.
5. Receive a report on past and future financial trends.
6. Review the results of the City Council budget
questionnaire.
7. Receive a presentation of the single audit by the firm
of Arthur Andersen and Company.
8. Review and discussion of the proposed Denton Citizen
Survey'.
94 Discussion of the proposed North Point project and
procedures for reviewing other major developments.
10, Executive Sossion:
A. Leggal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V,A,T.S.
B. peal Estate Under Sec, 2(£), Art. 6252-17
o.5.
C, Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A,T,S,
D, Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art
6152.17 V,A,T.S.
tom.. ,
. City o2D#ntOA City Council Agenda
Parigel 22,
Two '
11. Official Action on Executive Session Items.
As Legal Matters
8. Real Estate
C, Personnel
D, Board Appointit nts
12. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas,
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin boa at the City Hall of the City o Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1986 at 440036 o'cloc,k
(a.m.) .m.
i 2144C
AGENDA
CITY aN DENTON CITY COUNCIL
April 22, 1986
Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council an
Tuesday April 22 1980, ut 6:00 p,m. in the Civil Defense Room
of the Municipal wilding at which the following items will be
considered:
6:00 p.m.
11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
supplemental agreement between the City of Denton and
the City of Corinth. (The Public Utilities Board
recommends approval.)
2. Consider approval of a designated voting representa-
tive to the General Assembly of the North Central
Texas Council of Governments.
31 Receive a report on annexation A-40, approximately
226.70 acres being p~% t of the J. Ayers Survey,
Abstract 2; W, Burleson Survey, Abstract 93; J.
Burleson Survey, Abstract 91; S.M. Williams Survey,
Abstract 1282; J. Carter Survey, Abstract 237; W.
Pogue Survey, Abstract 1013; and the F. Jaime Survey,
Abstract 664, and beginning east of I-35 north and
continuing in an easterly and northeasterly direction
generally along Rector Road to a point approximately
2,500 feet west of FM 2164.
4. Receive a report on the Public Technology, Inc. fire
station location study,
S. Receive a report on past and future financial trends.
6. Review the results of the City Council budgit
questionnaire.
7. Receive a presentation of the single audit b,, the firm
of Arthur Andersen and Company.
8. Review and discussion of the proposed Denton Citizen
Survey.
9. Discussion of the proposed North Point project and
procedures for reviewing other major developments.
10. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V,A,T,S,
H, Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A,T,S,
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T,S.
D, Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art
6252-17 V,A.T.S.
CitY of Denton City Council Agenda
April 22, 1986
Page Two
11. official Action on fixecutive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Yersonnol
D. Hoard Appointmonts
12. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C H R T I F I C A T h
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1986 at o'clock
(a.m.) p.m.
CITY SBUREMY
21440
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MWERS OF THh CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT
Consider Amendment to Sewage Disposal Contract with Town of
Corinth.
RBCOMMBNDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of March 19,
1986, recommended to the City Council approval of subject
Amendment to the Sewage Disposal Contract with the Town of
Corinth to allow for a second discharge point into Denton's
trunk sewer system.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND
Major developments are underway in the western area of Corinth
wherein sewer service is required in the subject area.
Corinth has requested a second discharge point into the City
of Denton's 21" trunk sewer line located between State School
Road and IH-35B.
The main issues are:
1. Corinth receives a second discharge and metering point at a
location more convenient to Corinth,
2, Corinth pays for all connection costs and metering and
deeds same to Denton.
3. Corinth would allow Hickory Creek to participate in a major
lift station and sewer line and would provide, through a
contract with Denton, pumping for up to 2100 Hickory Creek
customers.
4. Rates for this discharge point would include proportionate
capital and operating costs of Denton's wastewater trunk
and treatment system, but would not include costs from the
existing Corinth lift station since these costs will be
allocated to sewer service provided at that location.
0149n:7
S, Denton does not have a capital recovery fee for wholesale
wastewater customers.
6. No additional renegotiation of the Corinth/Denton sewage
disposal contract is contemplated as a prerequisite to this
amendment,
PROGRAMS DBPARTMEN1'8 UR GROUPS AFFECTED
Denton Municipal Utilities support services, City of Corinth,
City o Hickory Creek, citizens.
FISCAL IMPACT
Increased utilizatie)n of existing wastewater plant and line
capacity will aid in paving fixed costs. Additional
wastewater plant and line capacity will have to be added in
the future. However, these additions will be required under
the existing contract regardless of this additional discharge
point. Allowing this discharge point at this location would
use up the capacity of the 21" sewer line from a point near
Paige Road to this discharge point location earlier than
without allowing this discharge point.
Respectfully submitted,
Lloyd yarr-F-1-10 city manager
Approved',/
e son
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Proposed Amendment
MinutesgPUBwMeetingpofa3/19/86act
ordinance
U149n:8
1412L
NO.
• AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL AGRERMUNT BETWEBN THE CITY
OF DENTON AND CITY OF CORINTH, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSi
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the Citpp of Denton hereby approves a
supplemental agreement between the C1ty of Denton and the City of
Corinth to provide for Denton receiving sewage from Corinth at a
sewage discharge connection in accordance wit,, the terms thereof,
said agreement being attached hereto.
SECTION I1.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1986.
RAY STEFHENS-~-MMr-
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
I
CITY OIL DENTON,OTEXAS
i
APPROVED Ay TO LEGAL FORMi
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
f By ~
f
THE STATH OF TEXAS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY Of
COUNTY OF awrON UNTON AND CITY OF CORINTH
Supplemental Agreement made between the City of Denton, here-
inafter referred to as "Denton" and the City of Corinth, herein-
after referred to as "Corinth",
WHEREAS, Denton and Corinth have an existing contract to
provide for Denton receiving sewage from Corinth at a sewage
discharge connection; and
WHEREAS, Denton and Corinth wish to amend said contract to
provide for additional sewage discharge connections;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
promises of the parties hereto and by consent of such parties,
that certain agreement entered into .between Denton and Corinth,
dated March 25, 1971, is hereby amended, modified and changed in
the following respects:
By adding thereto the following Sections 2A, 2B and 2C which
shall read as follows:
Section 2A, Interim Oakmont Discharge Connection,
In addition to the sewage discharge connection provided
for in Section 2, Denton shall allow Corinth to tempo-
rarily connect to and discharge sewage from facilities
constructed to serve 148 residential units to be con-
structed in Section I of Oakmont Subdivision, into
Denton's existing Wimbleton Lift Station until such time
as the sewage interceptor line referred to in Section 2B
of this amendment is constructed, at which time the
sewagge received from the residential units referred to
in this Section 2A shall be received through such sewage
interceptor line by constructing and connecting the
necessary sewage lines and facilities serving those
units to said interceptor line. The interim dischargge
connection provided for herein shall not, however, be
permitted for a period of time in excess of two years
from the date of this amendment, unless extended in
writing by Denton,
Section 2B. Additional Connection and Discharge Location.
In addition to the sewage discharge connection provided
for in Section 2 of this agreement, Corinth shall here-
after be permitted to make one additional sewage dis-
charge connection to Denton's existing twenty-one inch
(2111) sanitary sewer line at the approximate Point where
Denton's line crosses the existing Arco gas line, as
shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by
reference. Corinth agrees to construct the sewage lines
and facilities necessary to provide for the connecting
line within two years of the date of this amendment.
Upon completion of said interceptor line and connection
to the Denton sewage system, the sewer discharge con-
nection provided for in Section 2A of this supplemental
agreement shall be discontinued.
Corinth also agrees, as part of an effort to provide for
a regional planning approach to serving the future
sanitary sewage needs of the areas around Corinth, to
allow the Town of Hickory Creek and other entities in
the immediate area of Corintn to connect to and make use
of the Interceptor line to be constructed by Corinth as
provided for in Section 2B of this amendment, and agrees
to receive the equivalent discharge of sewage from a
maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling units, subject to
the willingness and ability of the Town of Hickory Creek
and other entities in the area to pay a reasonable and
proportionate share of the construction costs of said
lino and any necessary,lift stations or other associated
sewage facilities, proposed to be located as shown on
Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
Section 2C. Costs and Rates for Additional Discharge
o .Mts.
All connecting lines and facilities, including manholes
and metering devices at the connecting points provided
for in Sections 2A and 28 of the agreement, shall be
subject to the provisions of this agreement relating to
costs, construction, maintenance, operation, monitoring,
and rates charged for sewage received, as are applicable
to the discharge connection point provided for in Section
20 provided, however, that the extended sewage lines
necessary to provide for the connections in Sections 2A
and. 2B of this agreement shall remain the property of
Corinth.
It is expressly agreed by the parties that this cuntract is
supplemental to the contract of March 15, 1971, which is by
reference made a part hereof, and all terms, conditions, and
provisions thereof, unless specifically modified herein, are to
apply to this contract and are made a part of this contract as
PAGE 2
though they were expressly rewritten, incorporated, and included
herein,
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this supple.
mental agreement on the day of , 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
ATTEST:
CRXRLOTTE ALLEN kRY
CITY OF DENTON,jTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY C
r
TOWN OF CORINTH, TEXAS
BY;
MAYOR
ATTEST;
PACE 3
I~
I~
IgAIIER r~ , IAA" ! ~i eil,♦0
F + J !TA 111
i
fl" SIAIL SCHOOL RU !
wi;"y cm 1A
MN 1! Iwts
!1A IUO.44.0
LL Ht.U! EL MO M
M10FM D
co min
AM=
w a w ~ccr w
Ir1/1Tuff"T M rwue utarrK
. _ u #ua1 .j CRt o► tit tom. TaXA4
MMUIT
wlr.~r.nw~w,••,
tl~ r
L•,, rim SAM, Stw. OENTON
.
r^ v . r r 1 h' 1 , .r I
. '1
0SCAM M"
r
\ -
of
• ..1, , ~ r ~ ~ 1 L ~ • , • ~ M - ~',r~~~r may.
01
lot
fte,
PR F
Pit T%`~I 1 t
r. t A 1 r i ,
'M
•
Lim
141, •r
dft
' • 1 !
gob
CORINT rr
•,~}FNTON !"•QPROP. ;veNr auk
a '
01
Ova 1.4 "lot
• tl rid,, r
41
to/
PAT N',*
i ow
OOM
1 .
1 r ti ,
41
-,404 w
U6 AV :4
WEST C4RIIVTM .
SANITARY SEINER SYSTEM
PMOPO880 SYSTEM LAYOUT IE
o development of contracts
o resolving claim against and by the city
o interpreting the constitutional issues involved with
personnel terminations
With regard to the Claims Against and by the Utility,
Drayovitoh explained that about 401 of those are sewer
backup complaints oVainst the city, 201 are damage claims
caused by utility vehicles or power outages, and the
remaining would include claims by utility for damage, ito.
Drayovitoh pointed out the utility damage claims are most
expensive when electricity is involved.
Drayovitoh than went on to discuss the constitutional
rights of employee terminations and how heavily involved
her department is in that and other issues for Personnel,
Drayovitoh summarixed by saying two areas that her
department is not participating in are delinquent utility
bill collections and atten!ance at PUB meetings.
Coomes asked what the legal requirements for a capital
recovery fee are and Drayovitoh promised to provide the
Board with a legal opinion in the next agenda packet.
The Board than proceeded to discuss insurance requirements
of local governments and how situations such as wrongful
terminations and misconduct can cause litigation costing in
the millions of dollars,
Drayovitoh expressed her appreciation to Nelson for the
Utility Department's payment of her expenses associated
with her travel to an APPA legal Conferenoe.
The board expressed its interest in getting the Legal
Department to expand its activity in collections.
The Board and Nelson expressed their appreciations for the
excellont work the Legal Department is doing.
ls. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO CORINTH 6 WEB CONTRACT. PUS MrNVT", 3/19/86
This item was originally presented to the Board on November
20th, 1986, and the Board directed staff to develop subject
amendments
A
4217Utb
I
Nelson advised that the contract in the board Agenda includedt
14 Authorising A new motoring and discharge permit for
Corinth's sower into Denton's system,
2s provision requiring Corinth to allow participation by
Hickory Creek in a proposed new lift station and force
main in the western portion of Coantyl
3. A two year temporary authorization to allow Corinth to
discharge wastewater from 148 residential units in the
Oakmont subdivision into Denton's Kimbleton Village
Lift Station,
4. A provision for Corinth to take over operation and
maintenance of the existinK lift station,
s. A provision for providing a capital rooovery fee
payment to Denton in the event Denton ever imposes a
capital recovery fee within Denton.
Nelson expressed that Corinth had desired to delay a decision'
on accepting operating and maintenance of the existing lift
station until they, had studied the economics further and
Corinth had expressed they would noc be able to onter into the
contract ammendmant agrerwent with this particular capital
recovery fee provision. Nelson advised that the Denton City
Attorney also wanted to study this provision further. Nelson
then expressed that by removing paragraph 2 of section 3 and
paragraph 1 and 3 in section 4, that the document could serve
to provide for the temporary discharge of the 148 residential
developments coon to be underway in the Oakmont section of
Corinth* Without the authorization to discharge into the
Wimbleton Lift Stationp the developer could discharge into the
existing Corinth Lift Station which would utilise station
capacity and energy for pumping. After ep:oh serious debate
relating to capital recovery fees in such wholesale contracts,
Thompson motioned, ready second to recommend to the City
council approval of oubject rmendment with the condition that
paragraph 2 in section 3s paragraph 1 in section 4 and
paragraph 3 in section 4 be omitted. All ayes, one nay
(Coomes)p motion, carried.
4217M
OCT 30
Mal ` wrw
CTOWr't cj c_ R
n0uq g, SOOa gOYTM COIMN1w
sexton row tssos
NI rl Nral K
Tol lob Nelson (Director of Utilities)
R•1 To re-cep our convermstion of the meting held in Corinth concerning
our wastewater improvements study on October LO, USS.
We discussed Denton not requiring the Town of Cot ath to re-negotiate a
new contract by creating s new point of discharge on our wastewater system.
He. Nelson replied that there wouldn't be any reason for rs-nagotiating a
new contract Just because we have extra point of dellvery, at each point
we would amend the present contract only to include the new point of
wastewater discharge.
We discussed the taking over of the Denton lift station too the North of
Corinth and lines thereof, The Town's answer was that IV we were going to
consider taking the lift station over along with granting the instate and
esrees to Denton on the lift station, we would 1--, to have all cost esti-
mates of sewer cost >o paper in written farm b, a any decision could be
made.
Mr. Nelson indicated that as soon as time would have it, theme figures would
be written down and given to the Town of Corinth for consideration.
We discussed an impact fee being imposed on either the Town of Corinth, or
the Town of Corinth's developers for the upgrading or oversizl,ng of lines for
the Denton system. Mr. Nelson replied that he could not talk for Council or
the Utility board but he didn't think an impact fee would be charged.
We discussed by going to another point of discharge which was gravity flow
rather than through the pump lift station whether our rates would go down
or not. Mr. Nelson indicated that he would do some figuring and get back
with us abort how much it might be.
If there are any corrections to the agreements listed above, please correct
and send back to the Town of Corinch for review and for better understanding,
We appreciate your help in these and other matters cons rning our two systems
and lock forward to working together for many years to come to serve our►
and other areas with to much unity as possible.
Thank you
R Mike Daugherty
Director of Public Works
Town of Corinth
THE STATE OF' TL+XAa
CITY OF D!NT4)V SEWAOC DISPOSAL CONTRACT
TOWN OF CORIIITH
THIS AORENNINT made as of this jj~ day of March.,
19711 between the City of Denton, Texas, A. Municipal Corporation
of the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as Denton, and
the Town of Corinth, Texas, A Municipal Corporation organised
under the general laws c" the State of Texas, hereinafter re-
ferred to as Corinth,
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHyREAS, the public health, welfare and safety of the real-
dents of Corinth and the residents of Denton require the develop-
ment of adequate systems of sewage collection and disposal, the
elimination of water pollution and the preservation of the fresh
water resources of the area; and
11HEREAS, Denton is engaged in developing and operating a
oewage disposal system accessible to Corinth, and Corinth is de-
siroua of a sewage oolleotior system for its rosidents; and
WHEREAS, Corinth desires to deliver sewage oollected by its
system to Denton for diapossl; and
WHSRF.;S, to provido fcr the disposal by Denton of sewage
co113ctod by Corinth it is necessary that s contract be now en-
tered into establishing certain rights and duties of the par6ics
thereto;
NO',J, TicRCCORE, in consideration of the mutual oovenarnta con-
tained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows:
Se n 1. Dalivery and Ac.rntunce_ofewarn
Car_-. ahzll deliver to De:titon all of the sowsgo and in-
duttri:,. .;:,tta collected by Cor!nOi and Denton shall acoopt the
so'r:aCo and ~:aste delivered for tvzntmont and disposal na hore.Jn-
aftor providod subjoct to ouch renoonoble eulor and rCCulotions
nn may be Adopted from tine to tine by the City CouneJl of Donlon.
i
Denton shall not directly accept sewage or waste from any per.
son, firth, corporation or governmental agency which is located
within the boundaries of or is delivering its savage into the
local sewage facilities of Corinth without the written consent
of Oorinth, provided, however, that in the event that any portion
of the extraterritorial area of Corinth shall bt annexed to or
incorporated within said City, suc,r consent shall not be required
as a condition for the acoeptanoe of such sewage or waste from
such annexed or incorporated area,
Section 2. Connection of Corinth Sewage Facilities to the
Denton Sears a Facties.
Local sotirage faoilities of Corinth shall be connected to the
Denton So'..rage Sys:om at a point located along Interstate Highway
35E said point being further described as the intersection of the
extraterritorial Jurisdictional iirit line of both the Toarn of
Corinth and the City of Denton, said point being approxi:iately one-
half mile northwest of the corporate limits of the Torrn of Corinth,
Such connection shall be acoompltohod at the expense of Corinth in
accor'''.nce with the requirements of Denton cnd at such other points
of connection as shall be deterained by ~aonton, Corinth shall con-
struct and dedicate to the City of Dento-1 11 necascary s^traf;a
fteilitloz loeat:d ,ri';,in the City Ll.rnlt: o, Dorton nd th,. r
6. t a-
torritorial juriadiot.ional area s:hich r..a;; 1~c requirel to deliver
Corinth scro26e to tho prn3ontly czisting ?•;rton Sr:; Sycteo. Such
right to connacs to Dontnn's SESr717; obligates said ;odn of
Cori.rtth to rrAli.l4 the right, of +!ay, e.1sc:°=nts, cnd/or other con-
veyancos r.r_ess5ry for the eanst:-J~tion Of ,'aid I'noillt;ios, And,
COCInth .r-111 restore all the er.l;,zing struoturct: and/or in,pro:e-
eicnts 1; in:* in t';;e : Atht of stay or construction, to as good a con-
dition a* t. Toro thm construction took place; and shall savr: harr,-
lu.te, the C:•,y of U::ntnrt Crom ^.rt;; nd all tinbllity, cl,tlns, cult:,
actionz or c;.uecn of actlun;, a4ti.cnz Car dana en rot' inJu[r106 Or
otherwise by season of the construction work hereinabove provided
for, Any such facilities constructed, maintained and operated
under this station shall remain in perpetuity the property of the
Oity of Denton and shall not be operated or maintained by any other
than the employees of said City or its authorized representative.
It is expressly understood that Corinth will be reaponsibile
for the delivery of its sewage to said connection and Denton shall
obligate itself to construct additional sewage facilities as reason-
able for growth of the load on the sewage system, however, the deter-
mination to construct any of such facilities shall remain within
Denton's sole discretion.
Section , Construction of Corinth Facilities.
It is understood that Corinth shall construct, acquire or
otherwise secure the right to use all facilities required for the
looal collection of seara5e delivered to Denton pursuant to this
agreement and shall perform all survices required for the mainten-
ance, operation, repair, replacement or ir'provement of said local
system for delivering aeuage to the Denton System, includinC any
additions in betterment thereto, Corinth ehall, in its sole dis-
cretion, but with the advice, and consultation of Denton, determine
rho nitur^, location and type of construction of the Corinth Suw-
o6o Syeter,
Secti^n i! P, a; It for So',r Dlr,r,e^1
All se+:al;e taken into the Denton Sc:.aga System shall be measur-
er] by mol;irs installed at the points of delivery, LA 11 meters shall
be fu-:..;}',ed and !nstalled by the City of Denton at the expense of
the :o,an Corinth. The City o^ Denton a;,,reos to maintain said
moto:a to caus^ such ropaivs and/or adjuntmonta as may from
time to ::•_a be ncaesnary and to be properly maintained, Such re-
pairs C1iall be made nt the exponea of the My of Denton, unless
it can be uhown that thu oecoao Uy for such repair; wnc.brou,.ht about
by ;,n lmpro,cr act or norloat on the part or Corinth. Corinth acrorc
i
to accept DoAtonOs catimatoe of yuanitibes of sewage entering the
Denton System during all periods in which the motors fail to mea-
sure correctly such intake of sewage into the Denton System, pro-
vided there is a reasonable basis for such estimates.
For the disposal of towage hereafter collected by the Tot-in
of Corinth and delivered to Denton, Corinth shall pay monthly dur-
ing the term of this agreement a sewage disposal charge of 22.50
per one thouoand gallons of sewage delivered to the Denton Sewage
System. The Town,of Corinth agrees to pay for disposal of said
sewage at such rates as the City of Denton may establish from time
to time, it being mutually understood that such rates shall always
be reasonable in relation to the costs incurred by Denton for the
d.teposal of such sevraZe. The City of Benton shall give ninoty
days notice of any change in rates and ou:h notice shall be ir.
writing and shall be delivered in person or by mail to the Town
Clerk of the Town of Corinth, Bills for s^lrage disposal shall br
rendered mont'lly and delivered to the Torn Clerk of the Town of
Corinth and shall be payable on or before the duo date shoini thereon
which shall bo not less than fifteen (15) clays from such delivery.
There shall bq a further charge of ton (11)",) per cent of the amount
of the bill 1!' ;;at hat on or ~Wfore t;: dntz. Al' d::llnquent
balances ror.!!inin; ur,pa!d for one year or rors shr.ll ~o subject to
the addlzlona' char,;e ;f Night M'0 pcr ccr;t por annum until paid.
In addit.cn to the abc've co:%nudity chancy there will also bo char,;-
ed a rster rca:d n; and sbrv!CI nc chargo in tho amount of T' cnt,-
Fiv3 pzly month. Said e,lll be includrd in
t}lo ul.lir'~ 5tater,4nt. 3chr4,c di;po.al services to tho
To'rrn ;:r!nth may be di.sconti:',uod if any bill is not paid within
sLzty ( days of the duo date. The Tch'rrn of Corinth horcby valves
any and all nlal..ia for' da"+ar;cc ro:culcin,,; f:-on tlro diocontinunnoL'
of such co-v!ee,
-II_
An additional charge may be trade for sewage or waste of un-'
usual quality or Composition requiring special treatment, or Denton
may require pre-treatment Of such sewage or Waste, An additional
charge may be made for quanities of storm or ground waters enter-
ing the local sewage facilities in •x1645 of the maximum amount
permitted pursuant to City of Denton standards.
Sect on Responsibility Cf„.Carlnh,
The Town of Corinth shall be responsible for the delivery
to the Denton Sewage System of sewage oollooted by Corinth, for
the construction, maintenance and operation of local sewage faoili-
ties, and for the payment of all Coate incident to the collection
of such sewage and its delivery to the Denton Sewage System.
Section 6. Records.
Permanent books and records shall be kept by Denton and Cor-
inth of the respective rates established, the volumes of sewage
delivered and diacharacd into the Denton .:.;wage System wherever
such volumes e:°C measured, and the number of residential customers
and residential cvs'.omer equilivents reported. In addition, Denton
shall keep complete books of accounto showinj all costs incurred in
connection with the Denton Sow a&. System and Corinth shall keep
complete records showing the amount billed to each of its customers
,or'e~,er cervice and the balls used for such billing including
seu.age rlovi and water consumption for each ;ustomer .'here applicable.
The records required by this parr,;raph shnil be ,available for exami-
nation by either party at any reasonablc tin:a.
Sect'-n 7. Li^b111ty for D-iire,;.
A.% aability incurred by D.:,ton as a result of the operation
of tte ;n Se::ago System shall be the sole liability of Denton
and a .;ability incurred by the Tewn of Corinth as a result of
the opor~ti=:s of its looal sowa;;e facilities shall bo the sole
77ah;lity or Corinth. Xowcver, iL la further unduratood and agrocd
'fit' _ , ,x • .:-sr...n; rr.. i*
the approval or inspection of Corinth facilities by Denton shrill
riot relieve Corinth from full responsibility for the conformance
of finished work with acceptable standards,
9e2ti~a8. Assignment.
The Town of Corinth shall not have the right to assian this
agreement or any of its rights and obligations hereunder either
by operation of lair or by voluntary agreement without the written
consent of the City of Denton and neither party may terminate its
obligations hereunder by diesclutior or otherwise without securing
the writtoo :onecnt of the other party and this agreement shall be
binding upon the parties and inure to the benefit of the respective
successors and assigns of the parties horoto. In the event that
the municipality of Corinth whould be idesolved or should no long-
er be authorized to operate sewor facilities, the local sewer
facilities owned and operated by ouch municipality shall be as3ign-
ad and Cranuferrod to Denton subject to any outstanding debts of
said transferrin; muunicipality which havo hoer incurred for the
specific purpose or constructing or aeouirin,; such facilities and
subject to the acc^ptonoe by Denton of tie obliriation to continuo
to provide ssrr.: gorvioc to the reiidr..tz aivved by such local faei-
11ties upon rayr•,a: t r; ;r ;staid rest'ent of sc+:nro disposal %harilca qs
may be subSa;uLrnl'!y .Ist:r,7ined.
$ectlon_ 4. Cr.'nn~~1 d-Ite to .)r coY tr'lct
This racr;~;tit shall be in fu;.l rers:~ and ert'act a:r.t bindin,
upon th. .rticz i~ar:to upon the ox.cutirti .f this aZrcomont and
shall c.:. :nue in u)l f5ree and cffont fnr a period of thoUty (30)
years.
11huna^2r to Chic sZ:roor.ent notice is r'.,luired to bo Tien the
'ane Shall bo rtv^.n by :criatorad nail addreaned to the ro;pectlve
r,artio:r at the 1'ollowin nddre
I
. r„
0ityy a"rotary, City of Denton, Municipal Ouildin~, 215 East
Hog W, Denton, Texas 76201;
Town Clark, Town of Corinth, City Nall, Corinth, Texas;
unless a different address shall be hereafter designated in writ-
ing by either of the parties.
The date of giving such notice shall be deemed to be the date
of mailing thereof. Billings for and payments of sewage disposal
costs may be made by regular mail.
Section 11. Execution of Documents.
This agreement shall be execu'sd in duplicate, either of which
shall be regarded for all purposes as an original, Each party
agrees that it will execute any and all deeds, leases, instruments,
documents and resolutions or ordinances necessary to give effect
to the terms of this agreement.
Section 12, Vaiver,
No valver by either party or any tarn or condition of this
agreement shall be deemed or construed as a uaiver of any other
term or condJ,tlon, nor shall a waiver of any breach be deemed to
constitute a waiv:r of any subsequent breach ohether of the same
or a different provision of this agreement.
Suction 1". Rey^e;:ics.
In addition to the romodles provided by Irtwo thia agreement
shall bE specifically enforceable by either party.
Section 14. cnt!rot,•,,
This e~rex.~;a ner`o> and super:9de3 all prior neCotiationa,
repro ,r,:a::o;t; a„rep;,entn L;t;raen the parties hereto relating
to t)•,4 1t,;,,aet r_a',:tcr hereof and conet4tutca the entire contract
bets t-- -r parties.
I;. h;+JiitJSOPO the parties hereto have executod this
aGrcemont a3 of the date and year, rJrst above written.
CITY OP UCN.01
CITY OJ+ UI:N'i(1 J, 1 lS.tfi
.
' I 1
ATTL'8 s
40
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPRO
1~ VED 7 LEQAL FORM,
CITY ATTOMEY
CITY OF D-!-;= ,TEXAS
TORN OF CORINTH
BY: 4/ L
ATTEST;
J,j
T01,11; Of'
i
Mw 7
Cmbw Tf= if 6MMMM6
V - 1
P n tlrhrver COO Arlington, Tern 70MB-8988
00,
F AY: BIII Pltstick, Executive Director DAT1t: April 16, '1986
TO: NCTCOC Member Governments
CT: Designation of Official NCTCOG Veer" Repr+:!rsnesUwW, 1961,- W
the Bylaws of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, each
r government Is entitled to one voting re resentatlve on the General
Assembly . The r'aP must be call eiead oflricilid frass the
9f► of the arMStber gover,iiseset. The voting representative serves
as liaison between the local government and the Council of Governments,
receives special publications and announcements from NCTCOG, and is eligible
to vote on proposed Bylaws amendments and for candidates to serve on the
Executive Board. A city or county official must be a designated voting
representative In order to b^ considered for service on the Executive Board,
Since some voting representatives may have retired from office - or some
member governments may wish to select a different representative from the
one now serving - It has been NCTCOGrs practice to attempt to recertify
voting representatives from member governments on an annual basis, 1 his
has usually been done laati edlately following the municipal elections In April
(pending any necessary runoffs). Therefore, we are requesting the official
designation of your voting representative to NCTCOG for 1966.87. Tho apd=
Its avaWft to JIM gear esdstft {'ePoissildiedve - wWmd hrmaii nappoiiMownt
unkm he ar she is = lalrger In elA m.
Pies" Indlcste the official designation of your voting representative on the
enclosed form, and return to NCTCOG by Redlnemt Y& Aprf 30, if possible.
This designation will be Incorporated in NCTCOG's 1986-67 itegiliml Directory.
Your current voting representative, according to NCTCOG's records, Is indicated
on the attached page from NCTCOG's 1966-86 Regional Directory,
~E~ -
IFIII tst
ah
Enclosures
CenterpWnltwo 01691xFIKpDr1w DsH@WFOnWWM Me"617/M0-3M
NOM CKNTM TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Mwnbim GowKnnmt D*Wgm m of Vb** Ro emplaft 190647
cm"
As a nnnrbor of ffm Nash COOW %mdQ COWWN of Oowrn+i Mo
Clip of hanby dwgnNw
11i
~ TMNphd~Ir
0 Saw a ft WW" NoMWNWW to *0 NOW0 ON" ASSWw* AN IN"t
8ON&
rNo.
oa.:
flolam 1a
NCrcoa
P. CI Omwr C4a
'MS.o ~oa~aea
r.
cz~rY C0R1NCitt RW E!~ORE~RIIT BAR:
i
TOt Mayor and Rsabers of the City Council
r' KI Lloyd Warrell, City Manager
OMICTt ADOPTION Or AM ORNNANCR AND SSRVICI PLATE INSTITUTING AMNxIATION Or
APPROXMATZCLY 226.70 ACM BMINO PART Or Tm J. AYBRS SUM,
ABSTRACT 2, W, DURLBSON SURYSY, ANTRACT 930 Je DURLUON SURVEiY,
ABSTRACT 91, S. M. WILLIAMS SURVERY, ABDTRACT 1252, J. CARM SnVfiY0
ABSTRACT 2371 w. POGUR SURVtY, ABSTRACT 1013, An TEQ r. JA=
SURVSY, ABSTRACT 661, AND K4INNING ZAST Or I-SSW AND CONTIjMING IN
AN &ASTIRLY AND NORTUASTZRLY DIRIRCTION OMPALLY ALONG RRCTOR ROAD
TO A PONT APPROXIMATRLY 2,500 FIXT WIST Or r.M, 2164 (A-40).
NUQlMVDATION :
Approval of the ordinance.
:
The annexation is to protect against adverse development in Denton's
extraterritorial jurisdiction and to increase potential for control
of area surrounding the City of Denton's future water resource.
Staff has reviewed the creek as a possible boundary and still
considers the annexation more logical as presently proposed because
it follows survey lines and roads. Using the creek as a boundary in
this instance would benefit a particular property owner but would
not prove advantages from the standpoint Of a legal description.
J& 4ROUNDt
Description and slap are attached.
,QRAMS, DSPARTHRUTS OR GROUPS AFFICTElD.
City growth patterns
n5qAL 6GI t
Undetermined
Respectfully substittedt
,
Prepared by: Lloyd dell
cI~dL .LU hen City Manager
David Allison
Senior Planner
Amo I
Jeff Meye -
Director of Planning
and Develop"at
01S7e
AL
,v0 .
• AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A rKACT Of LAND CONTIUUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
OP LAND CONSISTING ~ OFEAPPROXIMWAG ATTELYL22THAT LOTO 6.70 ACRES ROF T L.40O(j PARCEL
1) LYING
Af0 BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE Of TEXAS AiiD
BEING PART Of THE J. AYER9 SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 2, W. BURLESON
S. M. WILLIAMSTSURVEY3o ABSTRACTSNON S 282 Y,
J. CARTEA URVEY,
ABSTRACT NO, 251, W. POGUE SURVEY, ABSTRACT no. 1013 AND F. JAIME
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 664- DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSEFYIdU THE
SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'T, DISTRICT PROPERTY; MD 0ECLAA1AG AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEKEAS,I a,regt,est for annexation for the property described
in Exhibit A , a copy of which is attached hereto and incor-
porated by reference heroin, was introduced at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the
petition of the City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was fforded, at a public hearing
hold for that purpose on the ~~~~y~~Lday of t9,, 1„ , 1986 in
the Council Chambers for all-interested persons to state their
views and present evidence hearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
hold for that purpose on the ff, day of _ , 1986 in
the council Chambers for all nterested pers na to state their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation pcc:vided
by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official nowspapor of Cho City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
UUW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEdTON HERESY ORDAINS;
SECTION I.
That the tract of land described in said L,xhibit "A" be, and
the same is hereby annexed to the C1,ty of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made noreby a part of said City and the land and the
pre-ent and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall boar its prorate
part of the taxes levied by Cho City.
SECTION It.
The property described in Exhibit "A" is hereby classified
as Agricultural "A" District attd shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION III.
Should any section or part of this ordinance be hold uncon-
stitutional, illegal or invalid, or the application thereof
A-40/CITY of DENTON/PAG:C ONE
r
tutionality,ollleaility0 invAUdltynort Ineffect~ivesuch nessuof nsuch
section or part shall is no wise affect, impair or invalidate
the remaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such
remaining portion or portions, the same shall be and remain in
full force and effect, and should this ordinance for any reason
be ineffective as to any part of the area hereby annexed to ttie
City of Denton, such ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any
such part or parts of any such area shall not affect the
effectiveness of this ordinance as to all of the remainder of
such area, and the City Council hereby declares it to be its
purpose to annex to the City of Denton every part of the area
described in said Exhibit "A" of this ordinance, regardless of
whether any other part of such described area is hereby
effectively annexed to the City. Provided further, that if
there is included within the General description of territory
set out in $action I of this Ordinance to be hereby annexed to
the City of Denton any lands or area which are presently part of
and included within the limits of the City of Denton, or which
are presently part of and included within the limits of any
other City, Town or Village, or which are not within the City of
Denton"s jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby excluded and
excepted from the territory to be hereby annexed as fully as if
such excluded and excepted area were expressly described herein,
SECTI_ JN IV_.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the day of
1986,
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1986.
AX
CITY OF MITON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
ALLEN, MLOM
CITY SECRETAaY
CITY OF DENTON,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADeGMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
/li6iL L(6a w~ '
A-40/CITY OF DENTON/PAGE Two
i
EXHIBIT "All
All that certain treat or paroe! of land lying and being situated in the
Bounty of Denton, Stets of Texas and bring a Part of the J. Ayers Survey,
nAbmtraSurvey, t 1;12TeJt C13, 4' ererr 9uewy0n AbSurvey, rtrac; Abstract 91,
• SyrM! 1lllliars t3urvey, Pogue
Survey, Ab as Tot lOl3, and I►, Jaime Survey, Abstract 664, and rare fully
dwarlbed as otlowsi
8101KNINO at a point in the present atty llmitr, said point lying at the
Intere•otton of' the last boundary line of the treat doeorlbed In Ordinance
06-05 with the oenter line of Or, last and WOrt road known as Rector Road,
said point also lying 350 tees last of and perpendicular to the center line of
t-35 and the North boundary line of said J. Ayers Survey, same being the South
boundary line of the B. Burleson Survey{
THINCI South 886 40, last along said lines a distance of 808,71 feet, roes or
less, to a point for corner, said point lying In the center of said read, said
point also bete{ a Northeast corner of said J. Ayers Survey, same being the
Northwest corner of maid W, Burleson Survey]
THINCI South 89' 35' last along the Northern boundary line of said W. Burleson
Survey a distance of 2,695.0 feet, more or less, to a point for corner, said
point lying in the oenter of said road, said point also being the Northoart
corner of said W. Burleson Survey, the Southeast corner of the I. Burleson
Survey, Abstract 65, and the West line of said J, Burleson Survey;
THINCI North to 42, 30" bast along the last boundary line of said B. Burleson
Survey, safe being the West boundary line of raid J. Burleson Survey, passing
the North boundary tin* of said road and•oonttnuing along said lines to a
point lying In the last boundary line of said B. Burleson Survey, said point
also being the Northwest corner of said J. Burleson Survey, and the Southwest
corner of the William Bryant Survey, Abstract L614, for a corner;
THINCI South B90 07' 03" last along the North boundary ltne of said
J. Burleson Survey, some beint the South boundary line of said William Bryant
Survey, passing at 2,639.14 feet, sore or Lose, the Northeast corner at said
J. Burleson Surrey, same being the Northwest corner of said S. William
Survey, aMt continuing a total distance of 4,211,94 feet, more or less, to a
point for corner, said paint being the Northeast corner of said S. Williams
Survey, tame being the Southeast corner of said W411lam Bryant Survey, same
being the Southeast corner of the 0. Ooddard Survey, Abstract 462, raid point
aLse lying In the Wert boundary line at said J. Carter Survey;
THINCI North along the last 'Joundary line of said D. doddned Survey, same
being the Volt boundary llna -it said Carter survey, passing at 3300.0 feet,
more or lose, the Northeast corner of said D. Goddard Survey, sore being the
southerly Southeast corner of the William Crawford Survey, Abstract 280, and
continuing a total distance at 1.755.12 feet, more or less, to a point toe
aoraee, said point being an lnr. ell corner of said William Crawford Survey,
safe being the Northwest corner of said J. Carter Survey;
THINCI last along the North boundary line of sold J. Carter Survey, sore being
tootSomorebor line of said
Southeastiooraer Crawford
Of 94 d Crawford pSurvoy, at
being
the Southwest aorner of the W.C. Otllaspte Survey, Abstract 1465, passing at
3732.96 toot, more or leas, the Northeast corner of said J. Carter Survey,
awes being the Northwest corner of said V. Pogue Survey, passing at 5243.92
foot, more or leas, the Southwest aorner at said Oillrspie Survey, oafs being
the Northwest oorner of a IS mare tract of land as oonveyed teat 0, t. Stookard
to J. I. Stookard by deed dated Novoebor to, 1972 and recorded In volume 661,
Pete 64 of the dead reeorde of Denton County, Texas, and continuing along said
boundary line a total distance of 7,690.89 toot, more or less, the Northeast
ooeMr of said tract, held point lying in the toot boundary line of maid Jaime
Survey, sate being the West boundary line of said William Neemptj% Surveyj
A•40/CITY Of OUTON
THRNCR South Along the Rn9t boundary line )f sold Jaisw survey, same being the
West boundary line of s41d Narmeht Survey a distance of Soo feet point
top corner; to •
TNBNCB Vest 500 feet South of and parapet to the North boundary line of the
above srntioned 15 mare tract aanveyed to J. B. StookArd, passing at 2091.0
feet, more or less, the West boundary line of said tract, saws being a point
In the easterly . West
Line at ssid ld W W. bcundsry lino Of laid JaIM Survey, and the Cast boundary
►egue Survey, AM continuing along sad line 100 foot South of
and Mattel to the North boundary Itne of said W. Pogue Survey, Passing at
3957.93 feet, mere or less, the Vest boundary tine of said Pogue Survey, sw
briny the tact boundary it" of said J. Carter Survey, and eoattoutng slang
said lines a total distando of 10190.19 foot, sore or loss, to a point for
corner, said point lying 100 test South Of and perpendicular to the North
boundary tins of said Carter survey, said point also lying 100 feet last of
and perpendicular to the Wet boundary line of said darter Surveys
THBNCR South $00 toot Rost of aM paral,elsd to the West boundary lLne of said
Carter Survey, a distance of 3,795.12 toot, were or less, to a point for
corner, said point lying 500 toot Bast 3f and porpondLoular to the West
boundary ltne at said Carter Surveys
THCNCB North S9. 07' 03" Vest pasted a 500 toot the Vest boundary line of
said J. Carter Survey, saw the tart boundary tin* of said S. Williams Survey,
and contlnuiny along said line 500 f"t South of and parallel to the North
boundary line of said Wtllia ns Survey, passing at 2,09F.11 foot, more or less, bou Lineyattsa d J. Burlesonf Susaid rvey,, OA aoosnttauing along b setd
tins,aototal Mary
distance of 4226.11 feat, more or less, to a point for corner, said point also
lying 500 toot South of and perpendicular to the North boundary line of said
J. Burteeo„ Survey, said point aloe lying 500 Coat last of and porpendloular
to the Vest boundary line of said J. Burleson surveys
THBMCC South to 42, 30" West along a line 500 toot last it and paratlsl to the
West boundary line of sad J. Burleson survey t0 a point, 500 feet South of and
300 feet last of the Northeast corner of the W. Burleson Survey, the Southwest
corner of the B. Burleson Survey, for • corner;
THBNCR North 19. 35, West passing at $00 !est the west boundary line of said
Survey AMacont nuing the "at
500 lhr South e at fvA sail W. V%rall lssllto othe
North boundary line of said W, Burleson Survey, a distance of 3,191,73 fact,
mars or loos, to a point lying in the Welt boundary time of sa:d V. Surleson
survey, saw being an last boundary tine of said J. Ayers Survey;
THBMCR North 140 401 West along a line 100 foot South of and parallel to the
Worth boundary Lino at said J. Ayers Survey, a distance of 772.21 feet, more
0r lest, to a point for comer, said point lying 500 toot South at and
parallel to a Worth boundary line of said J. Ayers Survey, said point 4190
lying In present city limits AS est0 Llshed by Ordinance $06-05;
THBMCR North 20 $0' West 350 test last of and parallel to the center line of
I-35 for a distance of 501.33 feet to the place of beginning and contsinlna
approximately 226.70 acres of la•d.
I
A-40/CITY Or OENTON
w
PLAN OF SBRVIC'S_FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF D N„, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Artiole 870& as amended requires, that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
MMREAS, tha City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09, of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
i
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to newer lines in accordance with article A.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
E, Refuse ' Collect iron
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
Na.w .r~ ♦-`rlA ri ~W~~~ywYK~~Mr ..I M...r 'u. • ..'.r r...-..•r 4r•~. Nr. ~Y
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
-as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
1. Recreation
r(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the uue of City of Denton for
electric power.
,r
a .
r
Servioe Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
it, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will, be considered for CTP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city,
P. It *00" 4 1
or Aw A' . i • e len Aa
141
Pe"I CrtoM Rd to
7
• NON • R „ r ►t`.R ~ • • . r • • i~■~ ~ ~ 1.! w
• • :7• i . r •
• • lost • wLe,e •M~' 1'
alp OL
1 I : ' • ' y • s M
0 of
Of % •i . .
•r4' w or
,
b ~e n • N •
• do • to • vl. O ; ~ .he ier• a ers ~ . uo iz'ss sett an
~ •u a°~ • f fMun Un.an Mtl RA .ly Rpe old,
• cry 44 vot
;00 0 :0 11% 0
few ' p BOA Cr R~, • . w 'MCROynefOf Rf ~~~~'at•=~`'-•'•
out% of
•
hM r Rd (took
ld Go f f et
ISO
w soft
I.e •,/r : • Miih•1t 0n R0 • mar
• rq` Pilot set* RA Ascltr A~ ~ wt k"
i
ewe Vraerr • ~ ~ j •
e • rt Sllt••t/ RA. • •
RI. .t t r• , SN 6~~ • ~i Tiess~~e+r "a.ar
L.A
w • 1
• •
lorl# • RAC. ' r'• 1 •r~~ ~.l• • '
rat
v at
A-40
ANIt UTICON SCUOULR
w--"T*bruacY 24. 1906 Submit agenda item
vlebruacy 24. 1966 Submit agenda back-up
* X&toh 4. 1906 City Council sets Batso time add place
for public hearing
March s, 1966 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
March 7, 1966 Publish notice and Bailout
March 100 1906 Submit agenda item
March 12. 1986 Submit agenda back-up
* i March 18, 1906 City Council holds first public hearing
March 19, 1906 Notice to Denton Rscocd Chronicle
March 21, 1906 Publish notice and Bailout
March 24, 1966 Submit agenda item
March 260 986 Submit agenda back-up
March 260 1106 Planning i Zoninq Commission makes
recommendation on proposed annexation
April 1, 1906 City Council holds second public hearing
April 7, 1906 Submit agenda item
April 9, 1906 Submit agenda back-up
* ---~Apel1 1906 City Council institutes annexation
4p. / iproceedings
April 17. 1966 OrdLnanoe to Denton Record Chronicle
April 20, 1906 Publish ordinance
May 12, 1906 Submit agenda itea.
May 140 1906 Submit agenda back-up
* May 20, 1906 final action by City council at cequlac
meeting
* Denotes action by the City Council
09649
F w
,
CITY of DENTON, MXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ~ DENTON, TEXAS 70201 ~ TELEPHONE (811) 604.8907
Office of the City Minew
M E M 0 R A N U U M
TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1986
SUBJECT: Funding for Fire Stations
Tuesday we will be presenting the information to the Council on
the fire stAF10n locations. The information and
recommendations were based on a software program from PTI
called Fire Master, The software allows us to divide the City
into a number of zones, enter data on distances and travel time
between zones and then use the computer to determine the
optimum locations for such stations. A number of locations
were used. The optimum locations were at Bonnie Brae and
Windsor and at a location near the intersection of Lillian B.
Miller and Teasley Lane. Included in the report is data for
each of those locations separat and then for stations at
both. The study group did rr :end the optimum solution as
being a station at both ons with some reshuffling of
manpower from Central to r rf-set the costs.
Costs are the main cor ,rn at this point. We have discussed
staffing levels and equipment needs. Even building just one
station and equipping it will require a substantial amount of
funding. A bare minimum staffing of three men and an engine
would require us to hire 12 firemen and to purchase a new
engine. Labor and equipment costs at this level of staffing
would be approximately $525,000. This does not include all the
equipment, miscellaneous and sundry types of materials that
would be needed to make the station completely operable
#Vith funding requirements of this type and with the
uncertainty of some of our revenue sources now, I would
suggest that we finish the budget process before we begin
building one or more stations. Since we are concerned about
the sales tax and other revenue sources, we must be much more
comfortable with the revenue projections before providing a
station and bearing the operating costs associated with it.
Dire Station Funding Memo
April 18, 1986
Page 2
In conclusion, we would suggest to you that we advise the
Council of the study and the information it provided. I
suggest a hold on construction until current and future revenue
projections can be studied and verified. Jack and I and some
of his staff members will be at the meeting Tuesday night to
answer any questions that the Council may have.
I . )
c ve
Assistant City Manager
ii
2877M
REPORT
ON
FIRE STATION LOCATION
STUDY
JANUARY 17, 1986
i
4 ~~'i' i .7~7'S r P`•€g . X - r T", c"q7. ' ..w4
Fire Station Location Study
January 17, 1986
Page 1
During the past year a study has been conducted to determine the
most advantageous site(s) to locate new fire station(s). This
study utilized a series of computer programs known as Firamastar
that enable the study team to compare resulting response times
for numerous sites.
In order to utilize this Firemaster software package it was
necessary to establish certain sets of criteria and determine
fire demand zones (FDZs) meeting these criteria. These sets of
criteria consisted of risk level requirements, initial response
time requirements, full response time requirements and equipment
requirements. The study team at the direction of management
established seven risk levels, two initial response time goals
and two full response time goals.
The seven risk levels established consisted of low density FDZs,
medium density FDZs, high density FDZs, Industrial FDZs,
commercial FDZs, university campus FDZs and undeveloped FDZs.
The elements used in determining ,oe various FDZs were the
concentration of people, property valuatton, mobility of people,
and storage of hazardous materials or other high risk factors.
In establishing both the initial and full response time
requirements all FDZs with the exception of undeveloped land have
an initial response time rsoal of 3 minutes and a full response
time goal of 5 minutes. In the cases of undeveloped FDZs an
initial response time goal of 5 minutes and a full response time
goal of 7 minutes were established. By utilizing the Fire
Department-Is logs and by 'timing real and simulated runs to
various locations the study team was able to provide travel times
fot all of the routes travelled by the fire equipment.
Since all full response calls requires the dispatching of
equipment,from the Central Fire Station, it became obvious in the
early portion of the study that improvement in full response
times were not possible without placing additional equipment and
personnel at numerous .existing locations at significant increases
in costs. With this fact in mind and at the direction of
management the study team concentrated upon locating the fire
stations to minimize the time of the initial response time to as
many FDZs as possible. Exhibit A chows the results of locating
neu fire. station(s) at various locations and the resulting
reduction in the number of FDZs not receiving coverage in the
desired initial response time goal. As can be seen from Exhibit
A the best conditions are constructing new stations at Windsor
and Bonnie Brae and Lillian Miller and Teasley along with the
four existing stations. The building of these two stations at
these locations gives the City of lenton the raximum coverage of
all the sites that were investigated. It should be noted that
this study confined itself to the existing city limits and does
not account for the effect new development such as Lakeview would
have on the Fire Department's resources.
I
1
r I
Fire Station Y,u'cation Study
January 17, 1936
Page 2
In Exhibit B that is attached you can see the projected costs for
each of the proposed situations through the fiscal year 1991192,
These costs are based upon starting these projects in the current
fiscal year and having the building of the fire station(s)
completed and ready for occupancy during the first half of next
fiscal year. Since any new fire station requires that personnel
and equipment be available 24 hours 7 days a week the cost of
personnel associated with a new fire station quickly exceeds the
capital expenditures. As can be seen from Exhibit B the costs
associated with two new stations at Windsor and Bonnie Brat and
at Lillian Miller and Teasley vary by approximately by 2.0
million dollars over the next seven years. This variance is due
to the savings in personnel and equipment oosts associated with
moving ono company from the Central Fire Station. This same
exhibit shows that an additional cost of approximately 736
thousand dollars over this same time frame provides maximum
coverage over the next best alternative of 2 new fire stations
and the closin8 of an existing fire station. Finally Exhibit B
shows that an additional cost of 1.39 million dollars over this
same 7 year time frame gives the maximum coverage of 6 fully
manned fire stations over the least amount of additional coverage
with the location of 1 new fire station at Windsor and Bonnie
Brae.
It is the recommendation of the study team that the' City of
Denton build 2 new fire stations. These two fire stations should
be located at Windsor and Bonnie Bras and at Lillian Miller and
Teasley with the relocation of one company from the Central Fire
Station to one of these two sites. If the City of Denton due to
fiscal constraints can only build one fire station at this time
it is the recommendation of the study group that this station be
built at Windsor and Bonnie Brae on property already owned by the
city,
J~ Gentry Gary A. Collins
re Chief Director of Data Processing
E X H I B I T A
Page 1
EXISTING 4 STATIONS
Low Mad High Indus Comm Univ
All Dense Dense Dense trial ercial Campus Ualleveloped
FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS
Total FDZS 150 60 23 7 9 19 6 26
No, of FDZS over response time goal 99 57 14 5 8 11 1 14
Percent of FDZS not meeting goal 66 62 61 71 89 58 17 54
EXISTING 4 STATIONS PLUS A NEW STATION AT WINDSOR - BONNIE BRAE
Low Ned High Indus Comm Univ
All Dense Dense Dense trial ercial. Campus Undeveloped
FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS
Total FDZS 150 60 23 7 9 19 6 26
No, of FDZe over response time goal 75 32 13 4 7 10 1 8
Percent of FDZe not meeting goal 50 53 57 57 78 53 17 31
Percent of improvement over existing stations 16 8 4 14 11 5 0 58
No of FDZe over 110% cf goal 62 28 11 2 7 9 0 5
Percent of FDZe not meeting 110% of goal 41 47 48 29 78 47 0 19
Percent of improvement over existing stations 25 15 13 43 11 11 17 69
EXISTING 4 STATIONS PLUS A NEW STATION AT LILLIAN MILLER - TEASLEY
Low Ned High Indus Comm Univ
All Dense Dense Dense trial ercial Campus Undeveloped
FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS
Total FDZs 150 60 23 7 9 19 6 26
No. of FDZs over response time goal 78 28 14 5 8 11 1 11
Percent of FDZs not meeting goal 53 47 61 71 89 58 17 42
Percent of improvement over existing stations 14 15 0 0 0 0 0 46
No of FDZs over 110% of goal 63 23 10 4 8 9 0 9
Percent of FDZe not meeting 1',0% of goal 42 38 43 57 89 47 0 35
Percent of improvement over existing stations 24 23 17 14 0 11 17 54
F; X H I B I T A
Page
EXISTING 4 STATIONS PLUS STATIONS AT WINDSOP - ..1w 4NIE BRAE AND LILLIAN MILLER - TEASLEY
Low Mod High Indus Comm U:iiv
All Dense Dense Dense trial ercial Campus Undeveloped
FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZ3 FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS
Total FDZs 150 60 23 7 ? 19 6 26
No. of FDZs over response time goal 75 32 13 4 7 10 1 6
Percent of FDZs not meeting goal 50 53 57 57 78 53 17 23
Percent of improvement over existing stations 16 8 4 14 11 5 0 31
No of FDZs over '.0% of goal 56 28 9 2 7 7 0 3
Percent of FDZs not meeting 110% of goal 37 47 39 29 78 37 0 12
Percent of 1%6iprovement over existing stations 29 15 22 43 11 21 17 42
TRANSFER EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL FROM AVE A - MCCORNICK STATION
TO 1 OF 2 NEW STATIONS AT MESA - US 380 OR TEASLEY - SAVANNAH
Low Med High Indus Comm Univ
All Dense Dense Dense trial ercial Campus Undeveloped
FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZS
Total FDZs 150 60 23 7 9 19 6 26
No. of FDZs over response time goal 68 29 11 3 8 9 3 5
Percent of FDZs not meeting goal 45 48 48 43 89 47 50 19
Percent of improvement over existing stations 21 13 13 29 0 11 (33) 35
No of FDZs over 110% of goal 55 25 7 3 8 8 2 2
Percent of FDZs not meeting 110% of goat 37 42 30 43 89 42 33 8
Percent of improvement over existing stations 29 20 30 29 0 16 (17) 46
TRANSFER ONE COMPANY FROM CENTRAL STATION
TO 1 OF 2 NEW STATIONS AT WINDSOR - BONNIE BRAE OR LILLIAN MILLER - TEASLEY
Low Med High Indus Comm Univ
All Dense Dense Denso trial ercial Campus Undeveloped
FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZ3 FDZS FDZS FDZS FDZ3
Total FDZs 150 60 23 7 9 19 6 26
No, of FDZs over response time goal 65 24 13 4 7 10 1 6
Percent of FDZs not meeting goal 43 40 57 57 78 53 17 23
Percent of improvement over existing stations 23 22 4 14 11 5 0 31
14o of FDZs over 110% of goal 46 18 9 2 7 7 0 3
Percent of FDZs not matting 11OZ of goal 31 30 39 29 78 37 0 12
Percent of improvement over existing stations 35 32 22 43 11 21 17 42
J~
1
E X I U I B I T B
EXISTING 4 STATIONS PLUS A NEW STATION AT WINDSOR - Bonnie Bray
FY FY FY FY F'Y FY FY
Manpower 85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 91/92 Total
` Captains 3 59,043 126,352 135,197 1440661 1.54,787 1650622 7850662
Drivers 3 47,895 102,495 1099670 117,346 125,561 134,350 637,316
Firefighters 6 84,285 180,370 192,996 206,505 2200961 236,428 1,121,545
~i Capital 105,000 595,0OO 70O,OU0
FY Total 1050000 186,223 409,217 4370862 468,513 501,308 5360400 3,244,523
EXISTING 4 STATIONS PLUS STATIONS AT WINDSOR - BONNIE BRAY AND LILLIAN MILLER TEASLEY
FY FY F'Y FY FY FY FY
Manpower 85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 91/92 Total
!
Captains 6 118,086 2520105 270,394 289,322 3090574 331,244 10571,325
Drivers 6 95,790 204,990 219,339 234,693 251,121 26807OU 102740632
Firefighters 12 168,570 360,740 385,991 413,011 441,922 472,856 21243,090
Capital 2320500 1,317,500 1,5500000
FY Total 2320500 1,699,946 8189434 815,724 937,025 I,UU2,617 1,U720800 6,639,046
}1
TRANSFER EQUIPMENT AND l'ER.50NN> L FROM AVF: A - NaCORMICK STATION
TO 1 OF 2 NEW S'TA'TIONS AT MESA US 380 OR TEASLEY SAVANNAH
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Manpower 85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 91/92 Total
Captains 3 59,043 126,352 135,197 144,661 1540787 165,622 785,662
;E Drivers 3 47,895 102,495 109,670 117,346 1250561 134,350 6370316
Firefighters 6 84,285 1801,370 192,996 206,505 220,961 236,428 1,121,545
Capital 202,500 101470500 1,3500000
FY Total 202,500 1,338,723 409,217 437,862 4680513 501,308 536,400 3,894,523
v;
TRANSFER ONZ COMPANY FROM CENTRAL STATION
TO I OF 2 NEW STATIONS AT WINDSOR - BONNIE BRAY OR LILLIAN MILLER - TEASLEY
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Manpower 85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 91/92 Total
Captains 6 118,086 252,705 2700394 289,322 309,574 331,244 1,571,325
Drivers 3 47,895 102,495 109,670 117,346 125,561 134,350 6310316
Firefighters 6 849285 1800370 1920996 2060505 220,961 236,428 I,1210545
' Capital 1951000 10105,000 1,300,000
FY Total 195,000 103550266 535$69 573,059 613,173 656,095 701,022 40630,18
r•
DATE: April 169 1986
f CITY COUNCIL AMRT FORRAT
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: SINGLE AUDIT
SUMMARY: Presentation of the Single Audit by the firm of Arthur Andersen d Co.
BACKGROUND: The audit is required by the federal government for the purpose
of auditing grant monies received by the City of Denton.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
'Respectfully submitted:
oy . arre:.I
City Manager
Prepay bys
44,64
Ann Forsythe
Senior Secretary
Approved:
n oGran~e
irector of Finance
1429F
a M may.
i
f ,
[ S YY
hh`.r S~'~ 1 ~
'G`kmkr A~128
For IV Year ER" &pkM&r 30, 1 QA t i0k
Ate,, l?
~ a
}
~Ao
J9
CITY OF D&NTON. TEXAS
OND CIRCULAR A-128
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL REPORTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 342 1985
INDEX
Paae
Auditors' Report on Internal Accounting Controls 1
Auditors' Letter on Compliance 3
Auditors' Report on Statement of Selected Grant Activity 5
Statement of Selected Grant Activity 6
Notes to Statement of Selected Grant Activity 8
Schedule I - Schedule of Noncompliance and Other Findings 9
-i-
ARTHUR ANDERSEN & Co.
DA 1, LAS, TEXAR
February 3, 1986
AUDITORS' REPORT ON INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROLS
To the Honorable Mayor, City Council
and Acting City Manager,
City of Denton, Texas:
We have examined the combined 1.1-llicial statements of the City of
Denton, Texas (the "City"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 1985,
and have issued our report thereon dated December 20, L985. We have also
examined the City's statement of selected grant activity for the year ended
September 30, 1985, which is included elsewhere herein, As part of our
examinations, we made a study and evaluation of the system of internal
accounting control of the City to the extent we considered necessary to
evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards, and,
for the purposes of this report, the standards for financial and compliance
audits contained in the U.S. General Accounting Office's Standards for Audit
of Governmental Organizations, . Programs, Activities and Functions (1981
Revir,ion) and Office of Manageme:it and Budget Circular A- M,Compliance
Supplement for Single Audits of State and Local Governments. For the purpose
of this report, we have classi"ied the City's significant internal accounting
controls into the following categories:
o Payroll Cycle
o Expenditure (other than Payroll) Cycle
o Revenue Cycle
o Treasurv Cycle
o Financial Reporting Cycle
Our study included all of the control categories listed above. As a
result of our evaluation of the accounting controls in the Financial Reporting
and Treasury Cycles, we determined that substantive audit testa, which were
performed for these Cycles, were more cost effective. The purpose of our
Rudy and evaluation was to determine the nature, timing and extent of
performing the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the
City's financial statements and statement of se cited grant activity. Our
st,%dy and evaluation was more limited than would be necessary to express an
opinion on the system of internal accounting control taker as a whole or on
ary of the afarementioned categories of controls.
-1-
ARTHLTR ANDERSEN & Co.
DALLAS,TEXAs
Honorable Mayor, City Council February 3, 1986
and Acting City Manager,
City of Denton, Texans
Management of the City is responsible for establishing and
maintaining a system of internal accounting control. In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assest
the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures. The objectives
of a system of internal accounting control are to provide management with
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against
lose from unauthorized use or disposition, the City is managing its federal
financial assistance programs in compliance with laws and regulations and that
transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and
recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of the inherent limitations in spy system of internal
accounting control, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be
detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the system to future periods
is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the procedures may
deteriorate.
Our study and evaluation made for the limited purpose described in
the first paragraph would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses in
the system. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion an the system of
internal accounting control of the Pity of Denton, Texas taken as a whole, or
on any of the categories of controlo identified in the first paragraph. We
have issued to the City, in connection t.ith our regular combined financial
statement examination, a Management Letter. None of the items included
therein were considered to be a material weakness in internal accounting
control. These conditions were considered in determining the n.::ture, timing
and extent of the audit ttets to be applied in our examination of the City's
1985 financial statements and statement of selected grant activity, and the
Management Letter does not affect our report, dated December 20, 1985, on the
City's 1985 financial statements o;~ our report, dated February 3, 19864 on the
1985 stal-ement of selected grant activity.
This report is intended solely for the use of management, the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (the cognizant audit agency), and
other State and Federal audit agencies and should not be used for any other
purpose.
"t
_2-
rc
ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.
DAW Ad,'fgxAs
February 3, 1986
AUDITORS' LETTER ON COMPLIANCE
To the Honorable Mayor, City Council
and Acting City Manager,
City of Denton, Texas:
We have examined the combined financial statements of the City of
Denton, Texa.R, as of and for the year ended September 30, 1985, and have
issued our report thereon, dated December 20, 1985. We have also examined the
City's statement of selected grant activity for the year ended September 30,
1985, and our report thereon, dated February 3, 1986s is included elsewhere
herein. Our examinations were made in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, and, for the purposes of this report, the standards for
financial and compliance audits contained in the U.S. General Accounting
Office's Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs,
Activities and Functions (1981 Revisiun), the provisions of the Office of
Mwnagement and budget's ("OMB") Compliance Supplement for Single Audits of
State and Local Governments (1985 Revision), and Accordingly, included such
tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances.
In connection with the examinations referred to above, a represen-
tative number of charges to Federal programs were se:.acted to determine if
federal funds are being expended in accordance with the terms of applicable
agreements and those provisions of Federal law or regulations that could have
a material effect on the financial statements or on the programs tested. We
also tested that the federal financial rLports to the respective operation
agencies presented fairly the information required to be set forth therein.
The results of our tests indicate that, for the items tested, the Ci.y
complied with the material terms and conditions of the Federal award
agreements, except as described in the Schedule of Noncompliance and Other
Findings. Further, for the items not tested, based on our examination and the
procedures referred to above, nothing came to our attention to indicate that
the City had not complied with the significant compliance terms and conditions
of the awards referred to above, except as described in the Schedule of
Noncompliance and Other Findings.
_3-
Honorable Mayor, City Council Febru& ry 3, 1986
and Acting Cite? Manager,
City of Denton, Texass
This roport is intended solely for the use of management, the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (the cognisant audit agency), and
other State and Federal audit agencies. This restriction is not intended to
limit the distribution of this report, which upon acceptance by the City of
Denton, Texas, is a matter of public record.
i
-4-
ARTHUR AwDrR$EN 8r CO.
DAI.I,A* TEXAS
February 31 1986
AUDITORS' REPORT ON STATEMENT OF SELECTED GRANT ACTIVITY
To the Honorable Mayor, City Council
and Acting City Manager,
City of Denton, Texaw:
We have examined the combined financial statements of the City of
Denton, Texas (the "City"), as of and for the year ended September 30, 19859
and have issued our report thereon, dated December 20, 1985. Our examination
was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and,
accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other
auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the eircumetaiiees.
Our examination was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on
the City's combined financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying
statement of selected grant activity of the City of Denton, Texas, for the
year ended September 30, 1985 (the "Statement"), is presented for purposes of
additional analysis and is not a required part of the City's financial
statements. The information in this Statement has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the examination of the combined financial
statements and, in our opinion, is fairly 4t&ked in all material respects in
relation to such financial statements taken as a whole.
;
Ciry OF Ow". MW
SUMMIT Of SUMTO QUW ACTIVITt
7"M TMt fkAR p"t ItgggP# 30, 1915
Lelasca Mveeuea NLssee
laptaher 30, NttasMr I0,
7urrrr Oy Ap' ~l!!4 riders! BIMte Cl tp ttaerit,rna ~9~5
Departaaat of Nowtq esd UThes 9ewlopsent 122,342 1 217,262 1 - 1 - 1 417,07 1 132,977
Ueprtsrat of the Tnaa4ry - 401,921 - - !7),131 217,0)
U.B. paPartarot of Traaaportattoa - 441,441 274 317,73! -
Other Arutlty alaaelu 14,3" •47,007 I7=447 «.,U4,jq 44,247
fntei Orant-balatxd prolrasa 1 '1,743 I1, 132; 1471 111,777 11,l71,1S5 : 327,117
Tin accoopanylnt norm to 419cted Oraat Activity eta M lslytal Part et this atata t.
-1-
CITY OF DENTONt TEXAS
STATEMENT OF SELECTED OR4NT ACTIVITY
FOR T11E YEAR ENDED_ BEPTEItBEE_ 30, 1915
Federal Balance
Granting Agency/Grant Program/ Catalogue September 30, Revenues Groot - - MSeptelambake
Number September 34,
Number 1984 Federal _ Slat* City weUfteses 1063
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOpMW, 14.218
Direct Federal payments -
Community Development Block Grants-
First Entitlement (B84NCA80036) !22,342 ! 267,262 ! - !
Second Entitlement (88485WA N036) ! 3150062 =124,142
Total De - 32,135 32,633
Department of Housing amp.
Urban Development $22,342 $ 287,262 1 - !
! 417,697 !1529977
DEPANTMEJR OF THE TREASURYt ~~..Nr.
Direct Federal Payments -
General Revenue Sharing Program 21.300 ! - ! 403.928 ! - ! -
533,821 !129,6!3
Tota). Department of the Treasury ! 403,928 !~-w i____~
...N.» .N..M.1.. 333,821 1129,893
U.S, DBPARlNENT OF TRiWSPORTATIONe
Direct Federal Payments -
Airport Development Aid Program 20,102
Federal Aviation Administration
Airport Development Project (34800670184)
Master Plan Update and Esviroosuatal ! ! 440,255 ! - !48,916 ! 489,171 ! -
Impact Assessment Report (85134840670285) - 21,226 -
_ 2,338 23,584
Total U.S. Department of Transportation
! 461,411 ! !51,274 51207SS !
OTHAI GRANTING AOENCIG9t .w.~..
State Orsow
Texas Rehabilitation Commission (DDS134) !12,6$1 ! 4s,012
Criminal Justice Division- ! 320391
Crime Prevention Unit/3 (SF83AO19004) 3,238 12,936 7,422
Criss Preventloo Unit/4 (SI'83A019309) 150120 - -
Juvenile Low Faforcement Officer/1 _ 4,270 10,754 200045 50621
(SF640026992) 9,141 9,141 Juvsmile Low Eaforcesent Officer/2 - -
(818SC0292K) w~-- 200714 60656 34,205 6 433
Total Other Granting Agencies l14M-y - !47,011 !37,4!3 $ 1140362
.....r.r.r w.■.er »....r r.wrr,..,r ! MP267
(1) Tdeee programs are not covered by the 00 !Terse Bm !emit.
the sccompasying notes to Selected 0140t Activity are am Integral part of t►is stotamamt.
-7-
CITY OF T W§
NOTES TO STATEMENT OF SELECTED GRANT ACTIVITY
SEPTEMBER 30. 1985
(1) ORGANIZATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
The City of Derton, Texas is the recipient of certain federal
and state grant funds. The grant programs ore adm!nistered by various
departments within the City. The activities of these organizations are
monitored by City staff to ensure compliance with the requirements of the
underlying grants.
The accounting policies of the City conform to generally
accepted accounting principles for local government units as prescribed
by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Basis of Accounting-
The grant accounts are maintained and the accompanying
Statement of Selected Grant Activity has been prepared on the cash basis.
Under this method, revenue and expense items are recorded as they are
received and disbursed, respectively.
City Contribution-
Certain grants require Ghat a percentage of the total funds for
the program be provided by the City or other sources. Matching funds
from the City are provided to cover any expenses in excess of funds
received. Also, the City covers any expenses for costs incurred in
excess of total funds budgeted for individual grants.
Indirect Costs-
Indirect costs are allocated ';o ct:tain of the State funded
grants, based upon arktual direct cost incurred.
(3) FINDINGS OF NONCOMPLIANCE:
The findings of noncomplicnce identified in connection with the
1985 examination of grant activity area disclosed on Schedule I.
-9-
SCHEDULE I
CITY OF DEMs TEM
SCHEDULE OF NONCOMPLIANCE AND OTHER FINDINGS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1985
Potential
Reimbursement
Effect
Finding Source Findings Over (Under)
General The City does not have have a centralized
grant administrator. The grant programs
and administered by various departments
within the City. The City's Finance
Department disburses substantially all
funds for prngram expenditures upon
receipt of tho appropr{.ate supporting
source documentation. However, records
of grant disbursements maintained by the
departments responsible for administering
the grants are not reconciled to the
records maintained by the Finance
Department on a timely basis. The
records of the department responsible for
administering the grant activity should
be reconciled to the Finance Department
documentation on a monthly basis.
Community Planning and administrative costa of the $9s854
Development first entitlement period exceeded 20% of
Block Grant the grant entitlement.
Program
Texas The City's contribution during fiscal
Rehabilitation 1985 was 28% of the total funds expended.
Commission The grant requires that 30% of the total
funds be provided by the City.
i
* The reimbursement effect of these findings is nominal or not readily
ascertainable.
_9-
SCHEDULE I
CITY DENT N, TEXAS
SCHEDULE OF NONCOMPLIANCE AND OTHER FINDINGS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 304 1985
Potential
Reimbursement
Effect
Finding Source Findings Over (Under)
Texas Criminal These grants were not selected for single e
Justice Division audit review. However, during our review
of Criminal Justice Division grants
completed in October 1985, (Texas
Criminal Justicn Division Grant Nos.
SF84CO289929 SF82AO176499 SF83AO18313 and
SF84BO48506 for the periods from
October 1, 1983 through September 30,
1984; March 1, 1982 through February 28,
1983; March 1, 1983 through February 29,
1984; and September 1. 1983 through
August 31, 1984, respectively) we noted
that adequate documentation supporting
all grant activity was not maintaired.
The reimbursement effect of these findings is nominal or not readily
ascertainable.
DATE: 4/16/86
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the Citv Council
FROM: 'Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: 1986 Denton Citizen Survey
RECOMMENDATION;
SUMMARY: Annual review and discussion of recommendationa for the
19e6-Denton Citizen Survey instrument.
BACXGROUND: The City-has conducted this sure-ey since the mid-. 1970'x.
The Denton Citizen Survey is conducted annually to
assist management and Council in strategic planning
and to determine issues of importance to the,,,''04+•4;xehs
of Denton.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The results of this survey are used in planning by
all City departments.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Respectfully submitted:
, PC
par Llo v. Harrell <A"
City Manager
e Bryan C. 3 uart r
tle Administrative Assistant
YA d
T"is
Na• t mcwein
Tit a Ass etant City Manager
D)<M!'OM CIYIUN I NM 19"
( Respondent's Telephone
I
I Coatact made on call number 1 2 3 4 3
I
I Interview date
I
I Hello, my name is I'm working on a project for the City
I of Denton and I would like to talk with any female/male age 18 or older.
(TO RESPONDENT) We are conducting a survey for the City of Denton re-
garding citizens' feelings about services provided by the city. The
questions that I wish to ask you will take only a few minutes and your
answers will be useful to the city staff and city council as they
de- velop the budget for next yedr. All of your answers will be kept con-
fidential, Will you please take the time to help us?
I
1. First, how long have you lived in Denton? (DO NOT READ RBSPON86S)
I
I 1. LESS THAN 3 MONTHS (TERMINATE INTERVIEW)
2. 3 MONTHS BUT LESS THAN ONE YEAR (ASK Q la)
{ 3. 1-5 SPEARS
( 4. 6-10 YEARS
5. MORE THAN 10 YEARS
9. NO RSSPONSE/DON'T KNOW (NR/DK)
I i 14. FOR THOSE WHO RESPONDED 3 MONTHS BUT LESS THAN ONE YEAR.
( I What was the primary reason you moved to Denton?
f # 1. JOB
I 2. STUDENT NTSU/TWU
I I 3. RETIREMENT
( 4. DENTON AS A PLACE TO LIVE
l f 5. OTHER, SPECIFY w - _ -
I ( 9. NR/DK
I
I 2. In terms of cleanliness, quality of houses, and general,
appear- ance, how would you rate the condition of your neigh')orhood? Is
the condition excellent, good, fair, or poor?
I
I 1. Excellent 3. Bair
I
I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
iw -
f 3. I would I ke to ask you a quastion about streets in the city.
I Now would you rate the condition of the street and road surfaces
I in Denton? Are they in good condition all over, mostly good, but
i but with a few bad spots, or are there nany bad spots?
i
I 1. Good all over 3. Many bad spots
2. Mostly guod 9. NR/DR
I
J 4. Have you or any member of your family used the Denton Public
} Library during the past year?
I
J 1. YEA (ASK Q. 4a) 2. NO 9. Hit/DK
I
I 14a. How would trou rate Denton"s library services? Would you
J } rate them as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
~ I I
J J 1. Excellent 3. Fair
} + 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NN/DK
I
J 5. Have you or a member of your family used any of Denton's park or
J recreational facilities during the past year?
f
J 1. YES (ASK Q. 5a) 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I
15a. Now would you rate Denton"s park and recreational facil-
ities? Would you rate them as excellent, good, fair, or
I } poor?
{ I
I I 1. Excellent 3. Fair
} J 2. Good 4. Poor 9. PH/DK
J 6. How would you rate Denton's trash and garbage service? Would
J you rate the service as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
I
J 1. Excellent S. Fair
2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
( 7. Would you be willing to accept a reduction in the number of
J garbage pickups from twice a week to once a week, if they money
J saved from the reduction in pickups ware used to pay for
J city cleanup and beautification programs?
I
} 1. YES 2. NO 9. HA/DK
f,
J S. I am going to read you a list of actions the city could
J undertake that might make Denton a more beautiful and
I pleasant place in which to live. As I read each item, please
tell me whether you think the city should begin the program
I or activity mentioned.
I YES No NR/DK
I 1. Improve existing sidewalks 1 2 9
f 2. Add more sidewalks 1 2 9
f 3. Develop more attractive
{ entrances to the city 1 2 9
1 4. Put up new "welcome to Denton"
I signs 1 2 9
I S. Landscape street medians 1 2 9
I 6. Plant trees and shrubs 1 2 9
# 9, Have you or any oamber of your family requested the services of
! Denton"s Police Department during the past year?
I
1 1. YX8 (ASK Q. 9a & b) 2. NO 9. NO/DK
# 194. Now would you rate the services provided by the Police
# I Department? Would you rate theca as skeo llent, good, fair,
I I or poor?
# I
1 { 1. Excellent 3. Fair
1 { 2. Good 4. Poor 9. N9/DK
{ 19b. How would you rate the job done by the officer who responded
# 1 to your request? Did he or she do an excellent, good, fair,
( # or poor .fob?
I I
# 1 1. Excellent 3. Fair
1 # 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
1 10. Are you aware that the Denton Police Department sponsors a
1 neighborhood watch and other crime prevention programs?
I
{ 1. YES (ASK Q. 10 alb, & c) 2. NO (SKIP TO Q. 11) 9. NR/DK
I 110a. During the past year have you participated in any of
Denton's crime prevention programs?
I i
I f 1. YES, ASK: which program 2. NO (ASK 1Ob,c lnd Q. 11)
I I _
1 { (THEN ASK Q. 10b & c, 9. NR/DK
I I THEN SKIP TO Q 12)
# 110b. Since you know crime prevention programs are operating in
{ # Denton, how safe do you foal in your neighborhood? Do you
1 # feel safer than you did before the programs started, do you
# 1 feel about as safe, or do you feel less safe?
I I
I I 1. Safer 2. Same 3, Less safe 9. NR/DK
I 110c. How were you made aware of Denton'% cruse prevention pro-
f # grams. Did you learn of them through radio, newspapers,
{ ( crime watch signs in neigborhoods, a police officert or
! I through some other means?
I !
I I 1. Radio 3. Signs S. Other,
# 1 2. Newspaper 4. Officer 9. NR/DK
I I
{ 11. Would you be interested in learning more about Denton's crime pre-
vention programs?
I
1 1. YES 21 NO 9. NR/DK
i
! 12. Now sate do you feel Walking alone in your neighborhood at night?
! Do you feel very safe, somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe, or vary
I unsafe?
{ 1. Very safe 3. Somewhat unsafe
! 2. 84fe 4. Very unsafe 9. NR/DR
I 13. Tha Denton Police patrol all of the neighborhoods in the city.
I How often do you see a police patrol in your neighborhood? Very
often, often, seldom, or never?
1. Very often 3. Seldom (ASK 13a)
I 2. Often 4. Never (ASK 13a) 9. MR/DX
!
! 113.s. Does the fact that you seldom or never see a police patrol
I I in your neighborhood concern you a lot, a little, or not at
I I all?
! I
f I 1. A lot 2. A little 3. Not at all 9, MR/DX
I 14. Have you or anyone in your household called the fire department
for assistance with a fire in the past year?
1. YES (ASK Q. 14a) 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I 114a. Now would you rate the service provided by the fire depart-
ment? Would you rate it as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
I I
1. Excellent 3. fair
I 2. (food 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
I 15. Have you or anyone in your household called the fire department
I for an ambulance during the past year?
! 1. YES (ASK Q.15a) 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I 115x, How would you rate the ambulance service? Would you rate
I I it as excellent, good, fair, or poor?
I I
! I 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
! 16, ~ We have talked about~a number of city services to far, Now I am
I going to mention some of these services again. After I read each
service please tell me whether that service needs much, some, or
I no improvement.
Much Some No
Improvement Improvement Improvement NR/DK
)Garbage Collection 1 2 3 9
)Street Maintenance 1 2 3 9
ILibrary Serviceu 1 2 3 9
IParks and Recreation 1 2 3 9
(Police Protection 1 2 3 9
Ifire Protection 1 2 3 9
191actric Services 1 2 3 9
(Water Services 1 2 3 9
IBawer services 1 2 3 9
)!utility Billing 1 2 3 9
I 17. Now 1 am going to read the list of services again. This time
I please tell me which of the services you would be in favor of
( reducing it that were the only way to keep taxes and rates at
I their present level. After I read each service Just say yes if
I you would favor a reduction and no if you would not favor a
reduction.
I
Yes, Reduce No, Don't Reduce NR/DK
I
IGarbaae Collection 1 2 9
(Street Maintenance 1 2 9
ILibrary Services 1 2 9
(Parks and Recreation 1 2 9
)Police Protection 1 2 p
Ivire Protection 1 2 9
(Electric Services 1 2 9
)Water Services 1 2 9
ISewer Services 1 2 9
)utility Billing 1 2 9
I
I 18. During the past year have you called the city about a loose or
stray animal, or some other animal control problem?
f
I 1. YES (ASK Q. 18a) 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I
118a. How would you rate Denton's animal control services?
I Would you rate the services as excellent, good, fair, or
I I poor?
I I
I 1. Excellent 3, fair
I I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. HR/DK
I 19. Municipal bonds are often used by cities to pay for capital
I improvement construction projects for such things as straats,
( park and recreational facilities, and drainage improvements.
I Sometimes they require a tax increase, but payments are
spread over many yearn. Would ywr support a capital improve-
ment program financed by the sale of municipal bonds for any
( of the following? Just answer "yes" or "no" as I read each
I item.
YES NO HR/DK
( Street Improvements 1 2 9
I Drainage Improvaments 1 2 9
I Park and Recreation
( Development 1 2 9
I
( 20. Have you had any questions about your utility billings in the past
I year?
I
I 1. YES (ASK Q 20a, b, & c) 2. NO 9. MR/DR
f
120a. Whet question did you have?
I I
f I INCORRECT BILLING
1 { 26 METKR READING ERROR
1 1 3 PAYMENT NOT CREDITED
I I 4. RECEIVED DELINQUENT NOTICE ERRONEOUSLY
I I 5. OTHRAj SPECIFY
I f 9. NR/DX
{ 120b. Who did you contact about the question?
I I
{ { 1. CUSTOMER SERVICES
I 1 2. UTILITY DEPARTMENT
1 1 3. CITY MANA698'S OFFICE
( I 4. OTHER, SPECIFY
I 1 9. NR/DK
1 120c. Was the question satisfactorily resolved?
I I
1 ) 1. YES 2. NO 3. RESPONSE NOT COMPLETE 9. NR/DX
+ 21. Now I would like to ask you about contacts you have had with city
1 officials for reasons other than questions about utility bills.
1 Have you or any member of your household contacted the City of
1 Denton about a complaint, a request for service, or for informa-
tion during the past year?
I
1 1. YES (ASK Q 21 a,b,&c) 2. NO 9. NR/DK
1 121a. Who in the city (what person or office) did you contact?
1 1
{ { 1. OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
+ { 2. MAYOR OR CITY COUNCIL 7. SANITATION
I 3. POLICE S. ANIMAL CONTROL
{ 1 4. PLANNING/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 10. OTHER,
{ { 5 UTILITY SERVICES 9. NR/DX
I I 6. STREETS
1 I
I 12)b. Were you generally satisfied with the results you lot, or
I I not?
I I
1 { 1. Yes, satisfied 2. Not satisfied
1 { 3. Response not complete 91 NR/DK
I I
I 121c. Ware the people you contacted courteous and helpful when
{ 1 when you called, or not?
1 I
1 1 1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/DK
I 1
1 22. Overall, how would you rate the way the City of Denton is operated?
{ Would you rate the way Denton is operated as excellent, goods fair,
1 or poor?
I
{ 1. Excellent 3. Fair
1 26 Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DX
( 23, Generally, do you think that you get enough information about
! issues +ind problems facing the city and its citizens?
{ 1. yX9 2. NO 9. NR/DK
J 24. Denton has been experiencing growth in the number of houses,
+ apartments, commercial stores, and office buildings and I would
I like to ask you about this growth. Do you think the growth rate
J Is too fast, about right, or too slow?
I
I 1. Too fast 2. About right 3. Too slow 9. MR/D9
I 25. Denton is made up of several types of developments--businesses,
residential, and so forth. I'd like to list a few kinds of
{ development and ask your opinion about future development in
I Denton. The first is "retail stores." Would you want more
+ retail stores in Denton or not? Would you want more "fast food
I restaurants" ur not? (ETC.) YES NO NR/DK
I Retail Stores 1 2 9
I Fast Food Restaurants 1 2 9
I Other Restaurants 1 2 9
Hotels and Motels 1 2 9
I Single-family Housing 1 2 9
Apartments and Rental Housing 1 2 9
Entertainment Establishments 1 2 9
I Offices 1 2 9
i Industry 1 2 9
26. Based upon your experience driving in the City of Denton, do you
I think traffic is a very serious problem, a problem, or not a prob-
lem?
1
J 1. Serious problem 2. Problem 3. Not a problem 9. NR/DK
I _ _
I 27. At the present time, do you think traffic signals are set to
pro- mote the orderly flow of traffic?
I
J 1. YES 2. NO 9. HR/DK
J 28. Do you think the city is doing enough to attract economic devel-
opment?
I
I 1. YES 2. NO 9. HR/DK
1 29. Have you used the free energy audit program provided by the
J City of Denton?
{ 1 YES (SKIP TO Q 30) 2 NO (ASR Q 29a) 9. NR/DX
1 129m. Are you interested in participating in the energy audit
I 1 program?
I ! 1. US 2. NO 9. NR/DK
J 30. Would you favor a tax to help support glow Hospital?
I 10 YES 2. NO 9. NR/OK
:t
1 31. Do you subscribe to cable telOvision service in Denton?
J 1. 798 (ASK Q 31Aa 2. NO (SKIP TO Q 32) 9. NR/DK
131a,~Please Ytell me whether you have experienced any of the
J I following problems with the cable TV service.
I I YES NO NR/DK
I I Installation 1 2 9
I I Response to complaints 1 2 9
J ( Repair work 1 2 9
I I Picture reception 1 2 9
J I Billing 1 2 9
I f
32. Generally, how do you rate Denton as a place to live. Is it ex-
I callent, good, fair or poor?
J 1. Excellent 3. Fair
I 2. Good 4. Poor 9. NR/DK
I . _
J 33. Now for the last few questions I would like to ask you several
J things about yourself. First, do you own your home or do you rent?
I 1. Own 2. Rent 9. NR/DX
34. Into which of the following ago groups do you fall?
J 1. 18-23 2. 26-35 3. 36-45 4. 46-60 S. 61 and over 9. NR/DK
J 35. How man
y years of education have you had?
I 1. LESS THAN 8 3. HIGH SCHOOL GRAD 5. COLLEGE GRAD OR MORE
I 2. BOMB HIGH SCHOOL 4. BOMB COLLEGE 9. XR/DK
1 36. In what city do you work?
I 1. DENTON 3. FORT WORTH 5. CARROLLTON
f 2. DALLAS 4. LEWISVILLE 6, OTHER, 9. NR/DK
J 37. ~ I am going to read you several different income categories. With-
out telling roe your exact income, into which category did your
J total household income for the past year fall?
1 1. Under $5,000 4. 15,000-24,999 7. 50,000 and over
J 2. 59000-99999 5. 259000-349999 9. NR/DK
3. 10,000-14,999 6. 359000-49,999
I 38. To what racial or ethnic group do you belong?
I 1. WHITE 2. BLACK 3. HISPANIC 4, ORIENTAL 9. NR/0K
I_
39. Are any members of your household physically handicapped?
I 1. YES 2. NO 9. NR/DK
J 40. What do you think can be done to sake Denton a better place to
J live?
JThank you very much for your time and cooMrstlon, We believe this pro-
Jjact will help city officialo provide better services to all citizens.
I_
JINTERVIMRi RECORD SEX Of RESPONCENT
1 FBMALS 2. MALE 9. MR/DK
I ~
DATE: 04/22/86
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SU$Jli(:r: Discussion of Z-1793
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommende,; denial
of the zoning request at its March 26, 1986 meeting,
SUMMARY: A 412 acre tract located in a low and moderate intensity
area. The project is predominately non-residential and
violates numerous Development Guide policies.
BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of
a similar request on January Z2, 1986.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Four notices were mailed to
property owners wi n wo hundred feet. All departments
and programs involved with the development review process
will be affected.
FISCAL IMPA_C_T: The actual impact on the general fund cannot be
determined at this time with the information available;
however, a number of costs as well as benefits could be
anticipated.
Respectfully submitted:
oy
City Manager
Prepared by:
Cecile arson
Urban Planner
Appro d:
~ ye
Director of Planning
and Development
feF. x T,.. e.T- .."F•!..~~.~_-x~..-R`~. T T...
GENERAL INFORMATION
Tract Is - Li ?ht Industrial on 27.76 acres
lb - Weighborhood SerViCe on 2.77 acres
Ic Office/Showroom on 20.52 acres
Id - General Retail on 6.33 acres
Tract Ill - Office/Showroom on 33.08 acres
IIb - Professional Office on 11,19 acres
Ilc - General Retail on 4.79 acres
Tract Ill& - General Retail on 25.72 acres
IIlb - Office on 23,01 acres
IIIc - Multi Family-R, Townhouses,
147 dwelling units on 12.30 acres
with a density of 12 units per Acre
Tract IYa - General Retail on 7.33 acres
IVb - Multi-Family, Apartments,
418 dwelling units on 17.43 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
IYc - Single Family, 183 lots with a minimum
size of'6,000 square feet on ;6.62 acres
with a density of 5 units per acre
Tract 1Vd - Multi-Family, Apartments,
323 dwelling units on 16.17 acres
with a density of 20.0 units per acre
IVe - Light Industrial on 28.56 acres
Tract Va - Single Family, 194 lots with a minimum
size of 7,5UO square feet, on b1.18 acres
with a density of 3.8 units per acre
Vb - Open Space/Park on 10.45 acres
Vc - Single Family, 128 lots with a minimum
size of 7,500 square feet, on 31,59 acres
with a density of 3.8 units per acre
Yd - Neighborhood Service on 2.95 acres
Tract VI - Loop 288 right-of-way, 4U.37 acres
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Provoaed Land Use
Light industrial 144 Nonresidential 474
commercial 134 Single family 304
General Retail 114 Multi-family 119
Neighborhood Service 14 Open Space 24
Office 84 Right of Way 104
Multi-family 34 I'
Multi-family (MF1) 84
Single family (6,000) 94
Single Family (7,500) 214
open Space 2•
Right of Way 1,,1lot
F,
durrounding Lund Use
and Zoning: North - Agricultural; outside City
limits
South - Single family, multi-family
(SF-160 MF-l, PD-80 PD-63)
East - Agricultural; residential
(PD-72, SF-10)
west - Agriculturali light
industrial
Denton Development Guide: Low intensity with a moderate
intensity node at FM 2164 and
proposed Loop 288 intersection.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Loop 288 is a primary major arterial. As part
of the overall thoroughfare planning in the
area staff has proposed a collector along the
eastern boundary of the light industrial
zoning; however, a secondary major arterial may
be necessary because of uses proposed in this
request. The City will not participate in any
interior collectors and arterials. A traffic
study is needed to size the roads and determine
where and what type of signalization is
needed. The Engineering Department requested
revised information about the traffic study
which has not been submitted. Additional right
of way for turn lanes may be necessary.
All roadsvonnecting to the arterial along the
west boundary should have 1/3 mile spacings.
Several of the roads should be realigned to
meet this requirement and the realignment could
alter the design of the site plan. The traffic
consultant for the project and the planner were
notified about the changes and a new site plan
was not submitted. The State Highway
Department has not accepted ti,e proposal for
service roads and the reversal of ramps at
Locust St. and Loop 288. The adjacent property
owner to the west has stated that they are not
interested in developing service roads. In
addition the traffic study provided by the
petitioner indicates that the intensity of this
proposal cannot be supported unless the ramp
reversals are constructed.
Utilities: Gas, electricity, and phone service is
available. A 16" water line is located in
Riney Road. According to the Master Plan for
the City of Denton a 16" water line should be
installed on the four extension sides of this
proposal. Sanitary sewer lines are
inadequate. An 18" line must be extended
approximately 6,000 feet east to the existing
Cooper Creek relief line.
Drainage: Detention may be necessary and improvements to
existing channels.
HISTORY
# 19.6 acre piece of this property was annexed by the City of
Denton on January 7, 1986.
The Planning and Zoning commission recommended denial of a
request on this property at its January 22, 1986 meeting the
following land uses were proposed:
Tract Is - Light Industrial on :7.76 acres
lb - Neighborhood Service on 2.77 acres
Ic - Multi-Family, 492 dwelling unite on 20.52 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
Id - General Retail on 6.33 acres
Tract Ila - Townhouses, 97 dwelling units on 8.08 acres
with a density of 12 units per acre
IIb - Commercial on 25.00 acres
IIc - Office on 11.19 acres
Ild - General Retail on 4.79 acres
Tract IIIa - General Retail on 25.72 acres
IIIb - Office on 23.01 acres
IIIc - Multi-Family, 270 dwelling units on 12.30 acres
with a density of 22 units per acre
Tract IVa - General Retail on 7.33 acres
IVb - Commercial on 17.43 Acres
IVc - Townhouses, 215 dwelling units on 21.50 acres
with a density of 10.0 units per acre
IVd - Multi-Family, 302 dwelling units on 15.12 acres
with a density of 20.0 units per acre
IVe - Light Industrial on 44.73 acres
Tract Va -.Single Family, 194 lots with a minimum size of
7,500 square feet, on 51.18 acres with a
density of 3.8 unite per acre
Vb - Open Space - 10.45 acres
Vc - single Family, 128 lots with minimum size of
7,500 square feet,, on 33.59 acres with a
density of 3.8 units per acre
Vd - Neighborhood Service on 2.95 acres
Tract VI - Loop 288 right-of-way - 40.37 acres
Proposed Land Use
Light Industrial 186 Nonresidential 481
Commercial 101 Single family 218
General Retail 111 Multi-family 194
Neighborhood Service 11 Open Space 31
Office 81 Right of Way 91
Multi-family 121 TM
Multi-family (MF2) 71
Single Family (7500) 211
Open Space 311
Right of Way 91
MAT111 RVA1.7ATI0N
I I I I I
Development Guide Policy I GnaooeptiMe J Aoo.ptable I Not Applicable j
I -I
I I. Overall intensity J i I
standard eased on land J
use and/or toning. I I J
12. Concentration am j I E I
separation policy for I I
! multi-twill 200 units - I I ~ I
I low intensity 750 units - I I
moderate intensity. I I
I separated by 1/2 wile or I
50% of intensity area
I length. I !
I I ~ I I
13. Concentration sad I
separation policy for j I I I
retail, commercial, and I I I I
1 office in a low intensity I I I J
I area. Four acres I I I I
separated by 1/2 mite or I I I
50% of intensity area
length. i j
Access to collector i i I I
streets or larger. I I J
k k
I S. Housing diversity enoour-
! 0404 to insure netaw)r-
I hood tn'j*Srity. Coasibr J
I 0uoh pl.anntag poliateen I I I I
I M to mmity gradation I I I J
I transportation design
" open space
I ~
6. Protection of existing I
I housing. Yeiahborhood I I i J
l preservation.
I k
17. Access to open space am j €
parts. E I
k I I J
I I
I I I I
a. Diversified land uses,
9. suffering of .xtstt%
land uses gad toning. I I
10. Melahborhood input.
It. c~h.r ypliaabl. polioies.j I I
6, -FU AL CA,
al, r•
It. Ov.rail ratt". 1 l
•
. F
.
I
.
Zen/7?uT
I
19
-
q
r
-go gl.
~r M F-t . F- 7
N -D N -o
I DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS
M.
-s i R}~~'ya ADO i.~'•. lNh wM gwy now 0.6. CAA
W NNi lye ow 60"ty`
1 • lY114 L1 11018 1101M1A•AL t/ 16'
A 0173 011 NVAL A.ht 01'
Mj ' r l r r .heir " 0 w lf.Orl 0 'O1T~lN01YMIOtM &W f0'
I-d I i b n* o "OngltlMAL O►nM O.ul. W
M • IL11 00 MEAL 01// 31
4 b !1131 O OfFRx W M'
-b \ • f% Wo lowwo m u.uAO 141 'N'
111 • 1.32 011 MTAL
55 l.atl lr
b 9.43 W AMRTMEW ff.NAO fM fr
N-b • 36.41 V loft FAMILY-140• /.aAQ 163 !6'
s "M W APAXR Mfl' IWAU 3f! !6
C rt ` 6 ls.s6 U Uaw 11011/ "AL t1 36'
Yw /t/1 ir f110LE ►AMLV fff•M 7 NAO M4 w
► 11.x1 OF 00010ATOO "m
SL„ Of ~ ~1NM MAO .t» L!P W
.
f«~:n
r a.. ; , • a 66.31 A" m
r i -O 1 4f.17i - p•~ a+wuw ww. I WIN at!! w +++a f 3,300" aaaM wwrr
16T is R MMUff L 4016
oil" coumviewwo"VA IL3
19.66 111ML 1111
1 ~I~\ 60.31 flaunt ML a.l
IL41 to
1 ' 46
.31 M101RYAYID PAN Isom
44.12
IV-d
r w•e• raver
I wA A•P+ICr•w wln MIKr
w wen 1AAwr
•~'A we~w1,' s 6R16s
0 6wur••1an
' ; Y IMIR •Mw•1MaL
V-d a ma "awsa omm"m PROPOSED ZONNVG -PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
NORTH Poom
1r•• KMe •wMr r war 1w••rr a N wove 1ww wwwa w"••, OENTOK TEXAS
~n N0f i "a wr•i
sA.. Man" . s" M►» SVIIINNEY/ TEB4 INTEREST
M. MOO" MYMq
~ •arw ~atirw aue, Mw•~r••Yawww rw.
w ~.u I U~'Ylf
RECEIVEO JAN 3 1
.
P i Z Minutes
January 220 1986
Page 4
Mr. Escus asked about PD-24. Ms. Spivey said that PD-24
Just west of the four-plex section consists of a multi-
family complex. She slid PO-24 extends to south side of
Windsor Drive which is another development with some
single family detached structures and zero lot line
structures which were approved in the original PD. The
southwest quadrant of this area is included in this PD as
green space and recreational type area. It also includes
apartments to the west and to the development south of
Windsor, the area now proposed as four-plex and park area.
Mr. Claiborne asked about PD-2S. Ms. Spivey said that it
is a series of existing duplexes and four-plaxes that
extend west of the apartments on Olympia and Wolftrap.
Ms. Brock asked if the lower section of this proposal was
green belt for the other PD. Ms. Spivey said yes.
REBUTTAL: None offered.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Juren stated that the cast of improvements
WoUld not warrant single family use. He said that he
didn't want to let 19 acres set idle in this area. He
said that the traffic situation would be handled when the
Loop is extended. He said that it came as a shock to him
that the four-plexes that are proposed in the southeast
are taking up the green space that was originally proposed
for this area.
Mr, Claiborne said that as far as density is concerned it
is not so bad but that a lot of traffic would be put onto
already crowded arterials.
Mr. Escue said that he thought the SF-7 needed better
protection than this plan is showing.
Ms. Brock said that there is a need for green space and
open space. She said that the other PD got approved
be~-ause of the green space and now they are putting four-
ploxes there.
Mr, Bscue moved to deny Z-1773. Seconded by Ms. Brock.
Mr. Juren said that he didn't think the developer should
give up. He said that Lhere is a lot of positive aspects
to this plan. He said that four-plex backing up to SF-7
s negative.
Motion carried (4-1). Mr. Juren voted no.
B. Z-1786. Petition of Mel R. Lacquement requesting a change
In zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the plan-
ned development (PD) classification on a 412.12 acre tract
in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract 1288. The property is
located on the west side of FM 2164 approximately 1,850
feet north of Hercules Lane. If approved, the planned
development will permit the following land uses:
Tract Is - Light Industrial or. 27.76 acres
Tract lb Neighborhood Service on 2.77 acres
Tract le - Multi-Family, 492 dwelling units
on 20.52 acres with a density of
24 units per acre
Tract Id - General Retail on 6.33 acres
Tract IIa - Townhouses, 97 dwelling units on 8.08 acres
with a density of 12 units per acre
P z Minutes
January 12, 1986
Page 5
Tract 11b - Commercial on 25.00 acres
Tract llc - Office on 11.19 acres
Tract lid - General Retail on 4.79 acres
Tract Ills - General Retail on 25.72 acres
Tract lllb - Office on 13.01 acres
Tract Il1c - Multilamily, 270 dwelling units
on 12,30 acres with a density of
• 11 units per acre
Tract IVa - General Retail on 7.33 acres
Tract IVb - Commercial on 17.43 acres
Tract IVc - Townhouses, 215 dwelling units on 21.50 acres
with a density of 10.0 units per acre
Tract lVd Multi-Family, 302 dwelling units on 15.12
acres with a density of 20.0 units per acre
Tract lVe - Light Industrial on 44.73 acres
Tract Va - Single Firmly, 194 lots with a minimum
of 7 500 square feet, on 51.18 acres withza
density of 3.8 units per acre
Tract Vb - Open Space - 10.45 acres
Tract Vc . Single Family, 128 lots with a minimum size
of 7,500 square feet, on 33.59 acres with a
density of 3.8 units per acre
Tract Vd - Neighborhood Service on 2.95 acres
Tract VI - Loop 288 right-of-way - 40.37 acres
Three notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposition,
PETITIONER: Mel Lacquement, Planning and Zoning Consul-
tant, stated that the property is located to the northwest
sector of Denton, east of the TI site with an electric sub-
station and single family to the south. He said that a
portion of this property was recently annexed into the
5 City north of Loop M. He said that they looked at the
environmental and physical constraints on the site. He
said that the site is generally flat with two drainage
shed areas. He said the site has some existing and some
;proposed utilities. An existing 12 inch water line is
located along FM 2164. Sanitary sewer must be extended
1,000 to 2,000 feet and there are some constraints due to
capacity and downstream inadequacies of the sewer. He
said that there is existing electric on the site (Brazos
and TMPA) and there are easements for both the city of
Denton and TMPA. He said that there is 20 acres dedicated
right-of-way for Loop 288. He said that the Development
Guide designates this area as low and moderate Intensity
at the intersection of Loop 288 and FM 2164, lie said that
they asked themselves these questions: How do we transi-
tion from high employment area on our west to low Intensi-
ty residential? How do we honor existing single family on
south and transition to a high intensity corridor (Loop
288)? He said that their proposal is less populated in
comparison with Guide. He said they knew there were traf-
fic considerations but how do they address constraints:
1) overhead electricity lines: 2) high employment area to
the west; 3) interchange on Loop 288; 4) interchange to TI
and this property. He said that they were focusing high
Intensity on Loop 288 and transitioning down. He said
that the developers were proposin to construct service
roads from FM 2164 to the propose T1 interchange and to
dedicate to the state 11 acres of right of way. He said
this would set a stanlard to provide service roads along
the Loop. He said that there are 7S foot building setbacks
on both sides of Loop 288 and there are three places that
are dedicated for open anJ gretn space. Community faclli-
P 4 Z minutes
January 22, 1986
Page b
ties are needed but less with thin roposal than with Guide
policies, This proposal would prov de higher taxes than
with Development Guide standards. He said that this pro-
posal is not a corridor strip type development and that
they have tried to transition land uses.
Richard Larkin, PAWA-Winkleman, stated that they had
looked at existing zoning of this proposed development.
lie said they calculated number of trips on a peak hour
and daily basis that can be generated by the uses that are
planned under the present zoning, He said based on trip
generation factors taken from 1 E trip generation manual,
would translate to a total daily trip of 43,459. Utiliz-
ing this total daily trip number and dividing by total
acreage, there would be 106 trips per day based on zon-
ing. He said that there is a need for additional access
than what is currently planned. Currently there are 3
interchanges between, 1-3S and PM 2164 1-35, PM 2164,
U.S. Hwy. 77 with this development and TI development
to the west, we feel we have good justification to go to
the Texas Highway Department and have them implement an
interchange at the proposed collector roadway that forms
the boundary between the TI site and our particular devel-
opment. U.S. Highway 77 and PM 2164 are a little over 2
miles apart in which the Texas Highway Department likes to
maintain 1 mile spacing between interchanges and that this
collector falls in that allowance. Developer is proposing
to construct overpass over Loop 288 about midway between
proposed interchange and interchange at PM 21640 this
should help alleviate traffic congestion.
Mr. Claiborne asked about the time frame to develop this
tract of land. Mr. Lacquement said that they haven't set a
specific time frame for development but he believed their
program is approximately ten years away to have Loop 288 in
this section of Denton. He said tyat if they had a Phase I
s it would start with residential and move up towards the
Loop but until something is definite with Loop 288, it
would be difficult to put a development phase into effect
because this development keys to Loop 288. He said that
they have contacted and di,;cussed this project with sur-
rounding property owners. He added that they are willing
to work with anyone to facilitate this plan and will try
to accomodate all concerns.
Mr. Appleton asked if the developer would incur the cost
of the overpass. Mr. Lacquement said yes. Mr. Appleton
asked if the developer wanted the state to incur the costs
of the interchan;e. Mr. Lacquement said yes.
Mr. Claiborne asked for the approximate cost of the over-
pass. Mr. Larkin said that the cost for the proposed in-
terchange to hopefully be funded by the state would be ap-
proximately $1.8 million including ramping. He said the
approximate cost of the overpass and service roads proposed
by the developer is $3 million excluding the proposed in-
terchange at the collector roadway.
IN FAVOR: Bob Tripp, 109 M. Hickory stated that the de-
ve o er ad plans for single family In the southeast cor-
ner which abuts his property. He said that he had no ob-
jections to the uses and believes that this development
will be a credit to the City of Denton. He said he would
be glad to help with access to Locust Street through his
property.
OPPOSED: None present.
P 8 2 Minutes
January 22, 1986
Page 7
TAFF REPORT
p o : Ms, Carson stated that 19.6 acres of this,
Pe y wa annexed by th
1 e City of Denton on January 986 and that the remainder of this property has been in
the city for a number of years. She said that the proper-
IentoniDevelopment Guidenandsinyaamoderatedesignated
located the
the Intersection of Loop 288 and FM 2164, She said that
the purpose of a moderate area, according to the Develop-
ment Guide, is to encourage balanced City-wide growth and
to insure the long range land use balance indicated by the
City's concept plan. These areas are limited in size to 30
acres; however, if a diversity of land uses is proposed the
area may be expanded to 250 acres. She said that most of
this property is located in a low intensity area and the
primary purpose of these areas is to insure the overall
land use balance by controlling the overall density and in-
tensity in an area. Therefore, low areas should emphasize
residential use and represent our primary housing areas.
She added that the moderate and low intensity areas would
be over the standard by 701 and 801 respectively if this
proposal is approved. She said that areas I-c and I1-a on
the north side of the proposed Loop 288 and areas III-c and
IV-d on the south side of the proposed Loop 288 violate the
apartment concentration policy and the number of units al-
lowed in a low intensity area which is 200 units and they
must be separated from other high density housing by 1/2
mile. She said that all areas proposed for light industri-
al, commercial, general retail, and neighborhood service
violatu the policy of the size which is limited to 4 acres
and the separation policy of a 1/2 mile. This proposal in-
cludes 157.31 acres of non-residential use in the low in-
tensity area. She said that moderate intensity areas were
designated by the Land Use Planning Committee to encourage
centers of activity rather than strip commercial. The De-
dveilveopment Guide
along theccorridorstwith cnon-residential cseparat-
ed by other land uses. She said that diversified housing
patterns should be well planned to insure the neighborhood
integrity is established and maintained. Considering the
size of the project, the location in a low intensity area,
and the adjacent land use and zoning, additional diversi-
fied land use should be provided in this project. She said
that this proposal includes 30,45 acres of open space along
a drainage easement in the southern section of the propos-
al. Based on the percentage of one acre for each 150 dwel-
ling units, 11,32 acres of open space would be necessary.
Staff would suggest that open space be provided in the pro-
shouldabarprovided. that traffic study provi-
ded to the developer was delivered to staff at 5:00 .m. on
Friday, January 17, 1986 and has not been reviewed by on
staff. She added that the site design for the roadways is
not acceptable to the City Engineer. She said that consid-
erable improvements will have to be made to the sanitary
sewer, She said that this proposal violates numerous
Development Guide policies as well as numerous planning
considerations such as buffering, transition between
residential and non-residential uses, and good site-
design. Staff recommends denial of Z-1786.
M
what r, Has stated that this was the first time he had seen
said thatdthelMasteraPlanoForewater shows the whole area
ringed with 16 inch water lines. He said In addition to
that, the fact that the Loop goes through this develop-
ment, there would be a need to put lines on both sides of
the Loop since it is a state highway. He said that there
is a lot of industrial zoning in this development which
does require 3,000 gallons per minute fire flow and that
to .
P 4 Z Minutes
January 22, 1986
page 8
equates out to about a 16 inch water line, He said with
regards to sewage there are no sewer lines in the immedi-
ate area that would be capable of handling this proposal.
He said that the developer mentioned he was going to go to
the right and tie into a sewer line which is presently in-
adequate based on other developments in the area. He said
that a parallel line would have to be constructed to the
Cooper Creek Station which would be expensive or to go down
south along the western boundary down to Hinkle Drive. He
said that on Hinkle Drive there is a CIP for a parallel
line starting at Greenbrier and going south to Crescent
Street by the high school. The program has not been
started because there is no development in the area. He
said that this development would have to run sewer line(s)
down as for as Greenbriar.
Mr, Ellison stated that staff respected the fact that
Mr. LacGGuement did make an attempt to look at the Devel-
opment Guide policies. He said if the Planning and Zoning
Commission is inclined to consider this request that condi-
tions should be attached to the recommendation.
Mr. 6scue asked if they approved this request would the
light industrial section be restrictive, Mr. Ellison
said yes. Ms, Carson stated that a comprehensive site
plan would be required and the Commission would have an
opportunity to review land uses for the light Industrial
section but that any use allowed in that district could be
requested.
Mr. Claiborne asked if the park and open spaces were
acceptable to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Ms, Smith said yes.
REBUTTAL: Mr, Lacquement stated that the staff comments
arebased on the Development Guide policies, He said that
the comments are based on this land being developed in a
low intensity and 30 acre moderate intensity area, He
said that it is very difficult for this plan to fit into
those guidelines. He said that they feel that it is not
feasible and that the 30 acre node should be increased,
He said that they feel other factors other than land use
and intensity need to be evaluated. He said that there
will be a traffic problem with the Loop 288 corridor but
that with the service roads, interchanges, and overpasses
proposed a lot of traffic congestion will be alleviated.
He said that they can comply with all city requirements
relating to parks, streets, utilities, etc. He said that
they are in thou process of writing covenants for an
Architectural Control Board for this project that will
review all plans before they reach the city for review.
He said that he believes this project will be a benefit
for the city.
Chair declared public hearing closed,
DECISION: Mr, Claiborne stated that he saw a high con-
centration of commercial and light industrial uses along
these thorouW ares with traffic congestion, He said that
perhaps a moderate intensity node is justified in this
area, He said he has some reservations because of the
congestion it would create.
Pa. Brpck stated that she would like to commend the devel-
oper for a thorough presentation. She said that she would
like more information on tax impacts and cost to the citi-
zens of Denton from the developers. She said that the De-
velopment Guide is not ritid and inflexible but that their
job is to apply it to individual cases and that they are
beint asked to depart drastically from the Guide. She
P i t minutes
Jsnusry 22, 19#6
Page 9
added that the Land Use Planning Committee is starting a
revision of the Guide and that the changing of the policy
should be done by this group.
Mr. Appleton Rated that he agreed with Ms. Brock in giv-
ing the Land Use Planning Committee the benefit of the
doubt. lie said that this area should be moderate intensi-
ty and that hL totally disagreed with residential on the
Loop or major thoroughfare, He said that the developer
has an excellent plan in regards to the traffic situation.
He said that he feels like recommending approval but would
like to consider conditions. He added that the developer
and staff have done an excellent job of presenting the
case.
Mr. Juren stated that there is sympathy towards changing
this area to moderate intensity and that the Commission
could not wait until the Land Use Planning Committee made
a decision for this area.
Mr. Juren moved to recommend approval of Z-1786. Seconded
by Mr. Appleton.
Mr. Juren said that he wanted to add conditions that stated
that a comprehensive site plan be submitted for approval
and that no parking would be permitted in the 75 foot
setback.
Mr. Appleton asked about the overpass. Mr. Juren asked if
he meant the one at Locust Street or between their proper-
ty and the TI property, Mr. Juren said that he thought
the overpasses could a handled at the comprehensive site
plan level,
Mr. Bscue said that it should be required now,
Mr. Juren asked about the northern street. Ms. Carson
stated that according to the thoroughfare plan, this
street is totally illogical. Mr. Clark said that the
street was strictly for their use and that it should be
for public access.
Ms. Carson said that there was no traffic study to justify
the primary major arterials in this proposal.
Mr, Juren said that he thought the conditions could be
worked out between the petitioner and staff, Ms. Carson
said that if the Commission is inclined to approve this
request, conditions needed to be made at this time.
M5. Claiborne said that fie had four conditions thus far:
1A comprehensive site plan must be submitted before de-
velopment occurs; 2) There will be 75 foot setbacks along
the Loop with no parking therein; 3) Development will occur
according Lo City standards for that particular land use;
and 4) An ov~,rpass at Locust Street will be constructed at
the Developer's expense.
Mr. Juren said that the overpasses at the north/south
thoroughfare and west property line will be constructed at
the developer's expense and the other one will be funded
by the state.
Mr. Juren stated that he felt the conditions should be
worked out between the petitioner and staff for the fear
that the Commission would leave out a condition that would
be necessary. Ms. Carson stated that staff would add con-
ditions before City Council action if the Commission recom-
mends approval of the proposal.
Z Mihute•
January 22, 1986
Page 10
Mr. Juren moved to amend motion to include conditions as
follows!
1. A comprehensive site plan must he submitted before
devolopment occurs,
2. 75 foot setbacks along Loop 288 would be in effect and
no parking would be permitted therein.
3. Develop according to City standards for particular
land use.
• 4. Overpass will be constructed at developer's expense on
the proposed north/south thoroughfare through approxi-
mate middle of development and also at the western
property line upon completion of 601 of the develop-
ment.
5. The east/west thoroughfare in the northern section
will be along the northern boundary line of property
with details to be worked out in comprehensive site
planning stage.
Seconded by Mr. Appleton.
Vote was called on the amendment and unanimously carried
(5.0).
Mr. Bscue stated that the nor.-residential uses were a
little bit too high for his to recommend approval of
Z-1786.
Vote was called on original motion including the amendment:
Aye - Appleton, Juren
Nay - Brock, Claiborne, Bscue
Motion failed (2-3).
Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend denial of Z-1786.
Seconded by Ms. Brock.
Vote was called!
Aye - Brock, Claiborne, Bscue
Nay - Appleton, Juren
i. Motion carried (3-2).
! Mr. Juren stated that he didn't want this area to remain
1 low intensity.
jl Mr. Claiborne said that he thinks this area warrants mod-
erate intensity but that this proposal violates officially
adopted policies. He said that there needs to be more res-
idential type uses and added that he was a bit reluctant to
go against the Guide. He said that there is time for the
Land Use Planning Committee to make a decision for this
area.
C. Z-1790. Petition of Paul M. Heywood requesting approval
d`f~a omprehensive site plan for a portion of a 112.88
acre mixed use planned development (PD-41) located at
the southeast and southwest corners of Loop 288 and. Bast
McKinney Street (FM 426). This 3.12 acre tract anproved
for planned development/general retail land u56 ;s located
at the southwest corner of Loop 288 and Bast )wX inney
Street (FM 426). The proposed site plan coat•;ins the
following information:
Land Area - 89,000 square feet
Building Area - 18,000 square feet
Parking Provided - 97 spaces
Lot Coverage - 20 percent
Building Hei ht - 37 feet
Signage - 40 square feet maximum area,,
40 feet maximum height.
t
P t Minutes
March 26, 1986
Page 4
Ms. Brack asked how much do we want to became an apartment
city, She added that the Commission needed to keep this
in mind,
Motion dies for lack of second,
Mr. Escue moved to recommend denial of Z-1781 as current
conditionu exist. He said that he would reconsider if a
study session 1s held,
Seconded by Mr. Pearson.
Mr. Pearson stated that he could see no negative impact
unless in regards to the traffic.
Mr. Curry stated that he is willing to work with the city.
Mr. Pearson withdrew his second.
Seconded by Ms. Brock.
Vote was called:
Aye - Brock, Claiborne, Escue
Nay - Cole, Juren Pearson
Motion failed (3-~).
Mr. Pearson moved to table Z-1782 until a study session can
be held. Seconded by Ms, Brock.
Vote was called:
Aye - Brock, Cole, Escue, Juren, Pearson
Nay - Claiborne
Motion carried (S-#),
Mr, Ellison stated that the case would not be presented by
staff at the study session. He said that the study session
will examine the intensity area only.
8. Z-1793. Petition of Mel R. Lacquement requesting a
theplannedodevelopmenth{PDirclassificationdontai412.12
acre tract In the Thomas Toby Survey,' Abstract 1288,
The property is located on the west side of PM 2164
approximately 1 85U feet north of Hercules Lane, if
approved, the panned development will permit the
following land uses:
Tract la - Light Industrial on 27.76 acres
mac - Neighborhood Service on 2.77 acres
matt c - Office/Showroom on 20.52 a.res
mac - General Retail on 6.33 acres
Tract s - Office/Showroom on 33,08 acres
Tract - Professional Office on 11,19 acres
matt lc - General Retail on 4,79 acres
Tract - General Retail on 25,72 acres
fact IIb - Office on 23.01 acres
ec t - Multi Pamily-R, Townhouses,
14 wa ling units on 12.30 acres with a density
of 12 units per acre
Tract IVs - General Retail op. 7,33 acres
rat - Multi-family, Apartments,
418 we Ting units on 17.43 arses with a density
of 24 units per acre
Tract IVc - Single Family, 183 lots with a minimum
size o 6,000 square feet on 36.62 acres with a density
of S unite per acre
T
371 ract IVd Multi-Family, Apartments,
we ng units on IC.17 acres with a density
of 20.0 units per acre
P Z Minutes
March 260 1986
Page 5
Tract 1Ve - Light Industrial on 28,56 acres
matt '_V_9 - Single Family, 194 lots with a minimum
size o S00 square feet, on 51,18 acres with a
density of 3,8 units per acre
Tract Vb - Open Space/Park on 10.45 acres
ract c - Single Family, 1x8 lots with a minimum
3Tse 5 S00 square feet, on 33.S9 acres with a
density of 3.8 units per acre
Tract Vd - Neighborhood Service on 2.95 acres
Tract - Loop 288 right-of-way, 40.37 acres
Four notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; no reply forms were received in favor or opposition.
PETITIONER: Mel Lacquement, planning consultant represent-
ng w nney Tebo , stated that during the first request in
January there wss considerable discussion about the Loop
288 corridor, land uses and Intensity. He said that the
original proposal for the 412 acres was to make the area a
moderate Intensity node. He said that this proposal is low
intensity south of the Loop and moderate intensity north of
the Loop. He said that there is a moderate 30-60 acre node
at the intersection of the Loop and FM 2164. He said this
proposal it a good type of development for this area. He
said major thoroughfares have high intensity areas and lean
more towards higher intensity uses. He said that their
proposal is 1,000 trips per day higher than the Development
Guide and that there in oxtenuating circumstances that need
to be evaluated by the City. He said that there are no
slope or drainage problems and no 100 year floodplain on
their property. He said that they Will be extending the
water and sanitary sewer to their property and are willing
to comply with staff on support facilities. He said that
their proposal will benefit this area traffic wisp and that
this alone has specific merits, He said that they have
been very restrictive in regards to the floor area ratios,
building heights, building geLbacks, and parking, He said
that they are providing access to adjacent property and
that all roads will be finished before a building permit
will be issued. He said that he doesn't tht:; this is a
premature pro act and feels that they are living up to the
guidelines. a said that he feels this is a very signifi-
cant plan.
Kr. Claiborne asked how many acres did they went to in-
crease the node by at the intersection of Loop 288 and FM
2164, Mr, Lacquement said 90 acres on the north and 260
acres on the south.
Mr. Ellison stated that this project would be a considera-
ble distance in the future. Mr, Lacquement stated that the
plans for the extension of the Loop are in the first phase.
He said that from Sherman Drive to Highway 380 is out to
bid and that from Sherman, Drive to Highway I-35 is a:qlci-
pated in two years. He sold that the Loop is vary lmpar-
tant to the project.
IN FAVOR: Bob Tripp stated that more development is needed
on the north side of town.
Ben Pinnell stated that construction of the Loop would
begin within a few months. He added that they are greatly
in favor of the service roads.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF R1dPORT: Ms. Carson stated that a 19.0 acre piece of
tthi property was annexed by the City of Denton on January
7, 19N6, She said that the Planning and Zoning commission
P 4 1 Minutes
March i6, 1986
Yaps 6
recommended denial of a request on this property at its
January 22, 1986 meetin , She said that this property is
located in a low intens ty area as designated by the Denton
Development Guide, and in a moderdts node located at the
intersection of Loop 288 and PM 2.164. She said that the
purpose of a moderate area, according to the Development
Guide, is to encourage balanced City-wide growth and to
ensure the long range land use balance indicated by the
• City's concept plan, These areas are limited in size to
30 acres; however, if a diversity of land uses is proposed
the area may be expanded to 2S0 acres. The proposed site
plan shows approximately 31 acres of eneral retail and 11
acres of office on the west side of the intersection alone,
therefore, this area should not be expended in size. Most
of this property is located in a low tntenslty area that
includes a variety of land uses including single family
(SP-16 and SF-7), duplexes, multi-family and a small amount
of commercial and general retail zoning. The primary pur-
pose of these low intensity areas is to ensure overall area
land use balance by controlling the overall density and in-
tensity in an area, Therefore; these areas should empha-
size residential use and represent our primary housing
areas. Since this low intensity area is adjacent to a high
intensity area it is extremely important to maintain this
as a residential area. She said that areas III-c IV-b and
IV-d on the south side of the proposed Loop 288 violate the
size and separation policies in regards to apartment con-
centration. She said that all areas proposed for light in-
dustrial, commmercial, general retail, and neighborhood
service violate the size and separation policies in regards
to the retail, commercial, office, and light industrial
concentration, This proposal Includes 152.31 acres of non-
residential use in the low intensity area. She said that
the Development Guide discourages strip commercial by
encouraging diversity along the corridors with coammercial
separated by other land uses. The north side of Loop 288
has only non-residential uses proposed. She said
considering the size of the project, the location in a low
intensity area, and the adjacent land use and zoning,
additional diversified land use should be provided in this
project. She said that staff would suggest that open
space should be provided in the proposed apartment areas
and that minimum amenity or recreational areas should be
provided and that the park area be increased in size, She
said that Loop 188 is a primary major arterial. As part
of the overall thoroughfare planning in the area staff has
proposed a collector along the eastern boundary of the
light industrial zoning; however, a secondary major
arterial may be necessary because of uses proposed,in this
request. A traffic study is needed to size the roads and
determine where and what type of signalization is needed.
The Engineering Department requested revised Information
about the traffic study which was not submitted. All
roads connecting to the arterial along the west boundary
should have 1/3 mile spacings, Several of the roads
should be realigned to meet this requirement and the
realignment could alter the design of the site plan. The
traffic consultant for the project and the planner were
notified about the changes and a new site plan was not
submitted. The State Highway Department has not accepted
the proposal for service roads and the reversal of ramps
at Locust Street and Loop 288, The adjacent property
owner to the west has stated that they are not interested
in developing service roads. In addition the traffic
study provided by the petitioner indicates that the
intensity of this proposal cannot be supported unless the
rasp reversals are constructed. She said that this
proposal violates numerous Development Guide policies as
well as numerous planning considerations such as buff.er-
r r`
P ; L Minutes
March 26, 1986
Page 7
ing, transition between residential and non-residential
uses, and goad site-design, therefore, staff recommends
denial.
Mr. Ellison stated that it would be very unwise to have
another high major activity center in this area.
Mr. Pearson asked about the neighboring properties.
• Mr. Ellison stated that the 239 acres of James M. Brown
Company ties directly into the Tl property and has prop-
erty in the designated high Intensity area.
Mr. Pearson asked how many acres does TI own and when it
was zoned. Mr. Ellison said 200 acres and in 1979. He
said that the concern is the moderate node at the inter-
section of Loop 288 and FM 2164. He said that if this is
approved, there will be no consensus with the citizens of
Denton. He added that one should wait and see what happens
in this area given what already exists.
Mr. Pearson asked about land uses envisioned to the east of
TI. Ms. Carson stated that the policies indicate residen-
tial development with a moderated intensity to serve four
neighborhoods.
Mr. Pearson asked if staff expected single family to abut
light industrial. Ms. Carson said that light industrial
should be bufrered by homes. She said that the transition
could be light industrial, open space, multi-family and
single family.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Lacquement stated that the low intensity
area as 90 trips per day and added that this is not high
intensity. He said that they are asking that the moderate
intensity node be increased by 90 acres. He said that they
needed input by the Commission on diversity. He said that
they have no problems with the extension of utilities. He
asked the Commission to make recommendations to the Council
and that they will work out conditions with the staff. He
added that this project will support itself.
Mr. Pearson asked if the plan could be changed. Mr. Morris
said that it could be reduced as long as it was not a sig-
nificant change.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Claiborne stated that he was sympathetic
with staff's concerns, about the multi-family concentration
south of the Loop. He said north of the Loop he agrees
with developer in regards to the office/showroom that it
will be a warehouse type facility so that it will resemble
a community type development. He said in regards to the
service roads, he feels this is a good idea. He said
though that he did not think Denton was ready for another
LBJ.
Mr. Pearson stated that part of this plan he had a hard
time with but from a technical standpoint it is good land
use planning.
Mr. Bscue stated that his major concern was with the high
concentration on the north. He said with approval they
would merely be approving a high intensity area,
Mr. Pearson stated that he was sympathetic with the staff
in that they supported the Guide. He said that he would
recommend that the petitioner reduce intensity and add
more single family.
I f'
l ! i, rkC y a
'q
P i Z Minut,as
March 26, 1984
Page 8
Ms. Brock stated that they should have appropriate devel-
opment along the }.nap, Shp said that LBJ has not only
residential but single cam ly, She said that it is
acceptable to have residential on the Loop,
Mr. Juren stated that he didn't think that they were too
for off from At good plan, He said that the work places
need to be put by the roads to get them in and out at
eight and five.
Mr. Claiborne stated that his concern in approving this
plan was the 1200 acre high intensity area to the west.
Mr. Juren moved to recommend approval of Z-1793. Seconded
by Ms, Cole.
Vote was called:
Aye - Cole, Juren
Nay - Brock, Claiborne, Hscue, Pearson
Motion failed (2-4).
Mr. Pearson moved to recommend denial of Z-1793, Seconded
by Mr, Claiborne.
Mr, Pearson stated that he was not in total opposition to
the plan.
Mr. Juren stated that the higher intensity areas such as
the multi-family, general retail and commercial needed to
be reduced with an increase of single family housing.
Vote was called:
Aye - Brock, Claiborne, Escue, Pearson
Nay - Cole, Juren
Motion carried (4.2).
C. Z-1796. Petition of Mhisenant Properties requesting a
cc's g in toning from the agricultural ('A) district to the
planned development (PD) classification on a 60.209 acre
tract located on the south side of FM 420 (Bast McKinney
Street) approximately 650 feet west of Loop 288. The prop-
erty is further described as a tract in the M. Yoachum Sur-
vey, Abstract 1442, and the Mary L. Austin'Survey, Abstract
4, if approved, the planned development will permit the
following land uses:
General Retail - 2,83 acres
Office - 2.94 acres
Multi-Family - 608 units on 25,37 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
Single Family Attached - 249 units on 21 acres
with a density of 11.9 units per acre
Park - 4.64 acres
Single Family Attached - 40 units on 3.43 acres
with a density of 11,9 units per acre
Twelve notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; three reply forms were received in favor, no reply
forms were received In opposition, one reply form was
received undecided.
PETITIONER: Jim McElhaney representing Mhisenant Proper-
ties, stated that they agree with the conditions and are
very excited about the project.
Rogor Barrett, Metropiex Engineering Corporation, stated
that this 60 acre tract has six different type of uses.
He said that this particular plan has two clubhouses, two
swimming pools, park, and open space. He said that they