HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986
a
r. ,
0
HEAD' TH19 Pit.,,',
it
'
i
z
H
i
y
r. o
i,
•
a
•
f
1
It$$ BOND AUCTION TINA TAAbi
July 1s City Council passes resolution creating
a Special Citizens Advisory Committee to
implement Capital Improvement Plan
September t City Council appoints fifty-one member
citizen committee
September 4 First Blue Ribbon CIP Ccmmittes meetings 1I
sub-committees appointed
September 4 30 Sub-committees collect facts, most with
citizen groups, study needs
October 4 Sub-committee reports forwarded to blue
Ribbon Committ+s Chairperson
October I Sub-committee chairs and Blue Ribbon chair
reduce project list and finalize proposed
projects for each year j
October 13 full Blue Ribbon CIP Committee votes
unanimously to approve final CIP list
October 15 Planning and Zoning commission unanimously
approves blue Ribbon CIP Committee report
of five year plan ,
October 21 City Council received the Blue Ribbon CIP
committee report of five year plan
ootober as City Council held a public hearing on the
proposed CIP recommendations
1 November 4 City Council passed an ordinance calling
for a bond election on December 13
p November 17 Press conference held
Deosaber 11 Voters approved all seven propositions of
the bond election
el ~ • •
•
0
r
tLECIIUN ACTIVITIES
A. Prepare Fact Sheet
B. Prepare Slide Show (15 minutes) and script
C, Lettet to all Boards and Commission Members Eros the Mayor
with Fact Sheet
D. Letter to all Boards and Commission Members from Hugh Ayer
with Fact Sheet
E. Presentations to all Service Clubs and appropriate special
interest groups
o Service Clubs o Chamber of Commerce
o Firefighters o Realtors
o Police o School Teachers (TSTA 4 DCT)
o Bar Association o Black Community
o State School o Hispanic Community
o Dental Society o Benefit League
o Medical Society
F. Fund Raising
G. Special Interest Groups (contact, inform, get out vote)
o Athletic Groups o Retiremer• Centers
o Senior Citizens o Uomino Club
o Humane Society o Ministers
o Friends of the Library o fifth Steppers (Senior
o Urainage Homeowners Citizens Dance Group)
H. Media • Record•Lnronicle, University Press, CATV
1. Speakers bureau
1. Lay persons
a 2. City staff
J. Letter from t.ity Council to friends
A. Tours of Police, Library, and Animal Control
L. Letters to thojdttor
3I M/111986
' I
r, .`•,y` , ' ~
•
•
i ra
v
TASS KASTEP. RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Speaker's Bureau
[ask Master • Jack hiller
Assistant Task Master - Lisa Patterson
Staff Liaison - betty McKean
1. Recruit lay speakers
2. Contact all clubs and get on programs
3. Inform lay speakers of obligations
4. Coordinate with Assistant City Manager Betty McKean
B. Fund Raising
'task Master - Leith Apppleton
Staff Liaison - Lloyd ilstroll
1. Work With Campaign.Chairasn to finalize a budget
2. Raise the required funds
C. Special Interest Group Kepresentatives
1. Meet with group and inform about the Issue
2. kncourage to vote for all issues
3. Insure group leaders contact members
4. Insure group organizes a "get-out, vote" effort
S. Prepare post cards promoting the election
6. Special groups
a. Athletic Groups
Task Master - Mike Campbell
Staff Liaison - Steve Brinkman
b. Senior Citizens, Retirement Centers, High Steppers
Task Master - Hazel Frederick
Staff Liaison • Steve brinkman
c. Humane Society
• Task Master - Roberts Donsbach
Staff Liaison Bill Angelo
d. Friends of Library
Task Master - Georgia Caraway
Staff Liaison Joella Orr
e. Drainage homeowners
Task Master • von Smith
• f. Domino Club
Task Master - Les Holland •
Staff Liaison • Steve Brinkman
g. Ministers
Task Master • Bill Crouo'+
h. Benefit League
Task Master • Donna Trammell
S
F 1
Task Master Responsibllittes
Page 2
D. Media hepresentative
Task Master • Bill Claiborne
Staff Liaison • Rick Svehla
1. Brief media about the issue (Channel 25, Denton Record
Chronicle, University Papers)
2. Coordinates coverage and appropriate presentations
3. Recruit Individuals to write "letters to editor" in
support of the Issue.
t. Public Relations lliirector
Task Master • Joe Holland
Staff Liaison • Betty Mclean
1. Develop a campatan slogan and committee name
Ubtain approval from s eertng committee
3. Develop campaign material as required
F. Letters from Louncil Members
Task Master • Bob Gorton
btaff Liaison • Lloyd harrell
1. Obtain personal letters and marked lists from Council
2. Arrange for private typln`` of all letters
3. Arrange for mailing of all letters by 12.6.86.
I
U, upon house
Task Master • Tom Harppool
Staff Watson • ittck Svehla
1. coordinate with City staff regarding arrangements.
2. Arrange publicity for event
3. Arrange for refreshments, etc,
{i
3160M/111007
• 0 § !
0
s
= PAOPOSITION N0, T
SIREETSRAANSPOATATION/IRAFFIC CONTROL oWa w
rat warn arwir.,. ur4w o-,:1.0.
U-4101/I wIEM1rry r01►Aw TOTAL 1 9a 000
Twm U I 9 I7p,000 13 deG ox
u11MITrNtI41WrW,"„y~,rywa ix ~ PROPOSITION! NO. 3
Mwlro ~r irnwiillwall , ANIMAL CONTROL CV-.31111 EXPANSIONI
f94" a ,4l 01
LOq OM rrI Y { 1b
nMk IIN9 64 000 111 toll?
I1tIw,M l+erawl 0' 411-4 CO11rs, Gnl w I,wI b1
,wM 01 MMNM do 000 7,.000 1 1b 000
TOTAL
I,130.000 1 rN.000
W4 MT 4"
awarun wle" old fmp, wltl , PROPOSITION NO.
01411 m,0^{hnA^1uI on D00
1.141 w,a. dw WOO III STATION AND EQUIPMENT
m W1O"WI }
tMewy Lefto m WWw ~mMiG` ^pI'm°rwMM•kl a0, 00[ mms 40
tNrk DWA 414"Ola ilol am am RIMNwbl
tnlfw ow," if Ox 1 700.000
/ln lOrrWmMl We~
11!!9.000 TOTAL 1 x90,000
►F 1 rMrW Lr M 1,0 NOT, WON M.00 PROPOSITION NO
Ire- IWy/ II W 11oeW
. S
D%I rof►wnglap"'I tl0m ATHLETIC FIRLDSMEIGH86 AH000
M0 w ""'111 D"^"'"+Iwael L+lm 9 zo AND SENIOR CRI2EN CENTERS
1 3-4 =
TM IM t11{tMr
Lo" Em/ w MwpltwL PAM LW w wel WOO"- MR Cwtfal 9p 000
/ram Y L 0M G" M f;Ifp,M LatAe,wy UM.000 AIPWW Iyy 0, 912m so rweemwy
Y 1 >tN.eIW Mlc"M t NI Lift 0111040
~'p1r9m YL 1 IT p~ 0, Le01 M !00,001 I J90,000
Lem "4f Wry~iLapP Y.I IIOMYInyl llpa II BVW G1Yr[4M14n 144? oft
}`,_0.000 ATTIF" OpoopnW4 f 190.000
tl.7W0,90 X000
1Ml ltl1 It.p0.000
/M WweI oft al AL IT1RFm lMl OlvIaIW Ir,ptl,0a1 1111
11lowit"0"", r11W
Ira- 1N11 N IT Y. 7170 AInMe IeY OeNe►mwe H,J00,000
Ileoawtnreflel w x7011 {IrMf , i 1 am am
1i11p mp
TOTAL III Woos
IT 171.00 Fkc ee" Camw t"a l"l
PROPOSITION NO.2 AIn1"r.nweon.larI 1,400.001
DRAINAGE 11 ~wo
x1000 747.1` tl No III
Tree p" awwla
•%d0wCMO Mdji NOON" ' MAX ~PROPOSITION NO. S
wIryy Lam IwWy, flow LISRARY IMPROVEMENTS 10.11411
IhrtAwww DOW rr~rra,[~'eI 64111 "aim
&I*awry!lrNl w. low UbWV bnw*%Wwll 1 Am 000
fllr 7111 1 tll000 CON Off L" lowly! fmim I
DVnw Lard
ledIlls am '0am PAOPOSMON NO, 1 Il ool.om
T WWI so me LAW ENPOACEMENT CENTEAlCOIfRT COMPLEX
1 ml01 IIL►tW11 lmle • O
YIWWIIIWoawflpgln 1 4mw 17w,IMlw[nkrawtr11O"olcOwtawe/lu 1 won
'Loft l*
Do A" 0r,kllye 1M►tM0 1 M,aM ELM A owloc ill- phmr
0w 1 100.0M
tllagll
C.wrpw M 1MGrrlerr00er1 Owa1f14 ft PA,
L4)
11,!1[,000
tl.L10.001
0 , c
0
c>
0
NO.
December 13, 1988 '
(13 dlclambro do 1988)
City of Donlon Bond Electlon
(Cludad de Oanlon Elocclon Para 801108)
SAMPLE BALLOT
NOS
(80lETA TA MUESTAA)
Place In Ina squire bell • Slalorm me we de
co UI`41 enl Icuad'onp O
'ado do Is Ir l'* put inelu aTue Don na "R" el e11
War l amana'a en Que Qu,ere voted !
RRO►OSITiON NO, 1 (PROPUaiTA N0. q a
tOR,A HYOR Dll I
I TNI OaUANCI OF SP ?lime Or STREET AND '
1110"C IMPROVIAIINf $0403 it !U FMiS10h
DI !ON Ll OF If rr =IAN. M[JOM! I
AGArNST 114 wNTRA) I CALM v CONEIOL Do TRAFICOI
PAY PROPOSITION
104 . PROPOSITION N0. S (PAOPUISIA N0. S) •
on
)THE ISSUANCE •f] Ar ooa Or ORAINAOl
I IMPROYFMIh1 a- M FV+ON
N, MS-O PAAA OI
ADp Or! 4OJ MUORAS
A
NIT IIN CONTRA, ) I
r~A MOPOSITION N0. S hRO►U[aiA j
IA slide D•, I NO. 7)
I TNI ISWANCI Or 1'r
10401D 'ma eARA INT.00OMDF VoteiA~s Guide4
! IONp1 DE I'm am RAM DlNTRp 01 !
4UNST,14 COI CONTROL of ANIMALIJI
PROPOSITION NO, a (►RO►UIITA NO, n about your bond Issue
TOR I A PANOR 00 1
I TNl rAOUANCI Of oTWOM OI r,Rl ATATION
eOMpe
,TA M1,L fMre10N DI IONOS of Ino.OOp
AOAIMAT 114 CONTRA, i ; RAMCIONU DI IOMIlAOS1
AOA U PAO►OSITION NO, 1 (PROPUEITA NO, S)
rAV04 M r
1 '41 ISMIANCI of r Ila OX DI PRAIA
I IMPROYIMINT TNLVId I+1LD AND
1 NIroMIDIbpOp LND IIMICR CITANI
CON Oupon CIMTIRI IONOa ILA IMISION
N iilb~VlfOKAMIN me MOA fTCOV Z~y"
0 i SOCIAL Of VICI
A NDAo r CRlDADAN,)l 'I
OA:NAT 24 Dow" I
FOR IA FAVOR pgamoN No.1(PRO►UISTA No. n
1 WMp ~L!,I'Of F a' OW XQ OF L11RARr
FOAMS? N IPAPA LIR"THAI cc 40NOO Of 1, ow am
R CON? MI I
PROPOSITION NO, r(PAO►URITA NO. 1)
ruR IA rAVDR oA
O 1 eN►O"RCC11,ch t~ D OOOOVDRTT 11 nLOINNO • O
IENDI "a'd, DO PONOG DI el am me
.dA 0"1001 Ckr Coencp
iA 17 "OI fJICVC* # Of Level Blue A boon C1:laen9
IMST IIN CCNTMI r ° 0 Advb" Canmflt"
FUA'Vni 8 IDnIn1 Conllnllska
DL
0
W
0
r
lty cC Den::,n
F1 ve Yeer .eyd:e1 I7 P-ZVQmare Fre, rn=
tL 71:,OOG .
' n~JC~pO
Absentee
Voting
Municipal Building A t''000
215 E. McKinney ~6 , t3506=
Nov. 24-Dec. 0 s tina nc
B a.m.-S p.m. L ammo
Monday through Friday tnmoooo {
rima~aa
nomaoc
tW100
11111
W-81 o67aa 11006 4a peo-oa rwo o -
FiKal Yonr
Aeuul)ioW '3 m jewoo omo - £4 g0A0 310A
1.9t 'ON Pwied
alVd
aoeisod 'S 'n 10t91 legal 'uolu•Q
31YU ?fine Aauuixow *a Sta
A 9~Ao
Urm
x S. •
A ep
vn~
e
0
I
1
e
TO THE CONCERNED C)TVIVIS OF DENTON: WIN IN n/ mile" aserr be sorts oe at olwM wh1"n ed,drllwrlr rlnebn C+nlwa n,adrdr the December fJ, 1988 bond election lot
the pro Nn, rho 21 rmdHOn Solarawill lurd l en raw prngyhe and l poropn of ...+NNNIII~~~
phalli live Year capital improvement program is one of IMAulnollled bona.wltl N IMd Nr Viol the file boede win MIN Ihn" are omigi r Iwo nc.al Nn Cri In oe.nonn.rn and
Ira m0111 Crucial issues facing our community today We .11 uMill lool Iuu1hw611 41461 or IM Ddy Heavy e•p+ln has occuved m'he lest.
Mnna,t, to
11ANiaf the two ii el l are M Dow fu
have responded to twenty two Qr.a9t10ns that appeal 10 Nwr illhe rlp«NNr11edaIM"life ll.r milli" dNwlrooman 4 the m,rlmwn, Ind man, rrul+n And approve Phil annul will
or biro
be parllcululy imporNnl while eoalUing that ereryques ppmrrel l'Inlpo^I°un ell Dolma 4ll out ADwp.N N IN Dab issue will Slow
lion, no moiler hopes big or lini dtlserves on eneWBL M Clq to NIN 1 rollllm cenlw to Nrve I'll Ilia of
Me our
Ile el Ile city ill levy or leeM1211 IAPOZ y I e'unfil l1,
ny of Ihase questions wise asked by members of 1 (Vp+l,ee1„Ih Ia 1ru1.m.M N aanlrnu d«l IM i ol, dolres Whn1d NH.er
the City Council, Citizen's Wolfe Ribbon Advisory Com. Me born fDucrulld ro Ill IMP, will N M Inprrtn, In this amount tall, N rep«+Nn N the senpsr CNNrly Co-grow Nano
males and planning Ind Zcning Commission upon W rnn 1,0111, ,pgtm Co. he ll " trMpm, ire me..,,. n1
blrltm'I olli WDulsllon [ontlnoN ID grow Ind Mum, lot IDwe
Rlal revlew Of the recommended program Several public Piping OM we be tun hall wy aynoir all be else to he 11"4.4 pls. lord I[IMINI Walfr IM Avpowm A Iwgs or l W,pol+raaD
And 111
healings hove been held and error eight months of Ill poor$ w rM crap«elo wI epp...df pn«, terns room. Poll 24 Clair roplll, n lih I[," I11yg loom, m«une
tense planning and study. Our groups unanimously the Coy Cc pen he, I'll suo r« t 6101olk, the frowshal a room, a" uIlk" I'll D19r a W M IN t arro avpanslal
II
Waal ell that all seven propositions and Each s ecific Pro. 1,0,04 (I4 1 a mnmuwug we'd Nwnbwl or the due detrain Fended w«ll Val Wpunwr llhllNl rIX aka N wovlCed find
0 sCdv+n I sd.r, Or, Commdl« win N ,pppnled Ip Its build bcwN test lip Dwnlro clue a14 N wlil it earl evil IM tool l Nf
wot 1s needed to help Soros problems that eels" today m4 to Vi lamNa. wills Me prober .r Illy! group will rwnaln
Wp de Alex, quite pleased to announce that the capitol In mw a over IM obi rd, rip it ptue. sun caw 0IIAWI o1 wogn,l a" ars IN« opNN MN Illrgo , ~to NONayp
rnprovemen! prugrem eras bean slreicluied e0 that Ile to- Ii win N heir puurkh 11 Nnl ma 1 ire 11 marl ullm II 1M pointer, me Wry Hmlred aMpstN r111n1«, W4 N ton Whop
mwI field,
dRlonal llleroase In 1114 tea levy Is req U'I •.'110 fund the hard i I Wle a W.Iim"~ led lNUre srpoebo Mnlo ova Nl N+U
.I11 b e Drr9ram rwdbpsf Irwin Laa,rlry, co lNepn. or olNr cups, of cov,,mi lore oudy"I W hope you POll study the facts c vole u rs$ ef A le million
million h 111r,e I D,M New ~+Mwfs this aa4 ISM would ovoid, panel Funds N 11yM four tai Nlebalr
on i on December IJ ca donw h«rlognmwal a,rdln Vega Meg of And two lT ro~ fN41 N two is win u in"@me«s.l,u son
o all seven proposiUOns on December 1.1 w eh«tm.proreminla Nn D«n med. alklM proplAmyepnnmulg bell MN Is NNWIl InnulMg flow No i, 114"miolrg Illd NOs
S,ncefe thinill and app,etiallon, wcaalp In fcnWale
four IO lrpDled tell will f0wd, wId 1M fps leech Il+ld", me of .1rkl w IN
N IlpMed all the dnpopsd N }fogD Lose Whom Two m lips All
. l J . • IePr~NP~ M N n n * Iw Arerww hla
w,dM ft ,1mor aM IrNlk I"44-4i rte N IMVM*d And Vol, M eoccor Helda win N de•N~ of
will{ hA, }MN MrPrCHRIMl1 ill alai 141 IM 9'owll w aria q1M
liar Sl9phens, Mayor NO Huwen,, IM I.lpnN Imprur+mini Proof" imlopol Wilde to Mppir
III AvOl ma sell Avernus, In it,;,N l location Irvin win, load to
Unb+.wq dhe Alto l 4i Pelf Inn sell Annul traffic rill N Poll y M &6mwdl M awwo had M,o 0vd N Dpslww in h eastern,
'r 1 r i I rrMred eV Tome r.r IM elhw vet0k Imlonmol propoale In IM hod *beat ay Iwpsllw'Ne of.New tNeM oni NI Vol NNNetw w
Ifwe imluding rlta110 N NorlingNm Dd, Ind HmfoorMnN IV
Mile. aged MapsNoo lie b" "Hump
il'olh Ayet, Chalrnyn vN pur4" NN aOwOred red M a,1111W Nolbr in will 1n, mpnt
Ago IN y
E Mien's Blue Ribbon Advisory Committee Crop Pot Ind INe ell M N#.wsma~N vs Flat oil IedwN It M M occourl W IM IINbn all N Cone rvc ed In teed A we,
N al M u s In lfwt *we lNNq, MN to e 310 linewr emdy he$aM., IN Nwew too pro llanpneM wow to Comply .nn
sir, prNel/ M WIP sWwmdo b mob" hard a 1slpo^N came or 11. it m1%1,,
1618 bad iNUO w10 pal, fu., 1111114 .lean fill would 1I«
lr !
011 IN C . , ch I / 61Mr N tmIIN w of luili pl F~,denl MI nwItyo/yrpl win N N Ducat w nu rho Prig Nw eelpnt olll N located In the mill sure
Pllid, nmen "pent w InI prpfoct fill $'On {I DD Chen Womb by I" 711P of Denton WIN imu el w«+ W IN one
Planning g slid Zoning LOmrDIs!On
low ore ba IeNee« =10 The 0.anh", Cw Nd Cww on war M4
Iffe ed s 1ouNM N M N's .l/
OOND ELECTION Inodrwrogs yr Ormglcil lo rr w+Mlledbeudo worI Inote" Np 1" oepile Naeen/
pprenllN Imp11 Vol, IN, graMll nuheAw N n0.Nnb IN 111, all 111 pip her mrmMf N Nlli lolrq -ro I N tM [MIS rips ose ve a sr,
0 UES Tf0 N S AND ANSWERS ion Io:lutled M fine Program fit this 0a..Nr on I.wpt of o5\ N N «uMing M 1101410 I,1111Mwn Overarm M M
i91s tM C11HT I CW its ps riled all *Me NI001nlrvwls IN, Pew
Wit M tit low a Low IMovNMNya ea h voc,p Cpmpwr "I end tM shl"Id 114 Meg 0-MM N 01-dW 11 InWpwlI tlldfilNno
A whir N Meg Mapelw 4141 Not Pat DI«nmrM f«I IoM Ile ft npril we Ce, NIII b~ Paid old" Indwlklr, N severely Iklllit 61 a rail
A On car Ill ar 11. fill 40 III he alb a rnIrq IN the Cul .0 Nnlph rIll LM polka ptpwtri na•Id Mlo IM nnoyalw ew erh Hill Wlwlrq
ra .
hem ni • Crenh1u Ip r1K N wMMw I it I m114pr supply a psi s, Improve In 196713 Wrote w61 I dGltleal heed N CIHN mall J♦II aM Nlk, , ififis ashy, H Imet ewe wmn 11«11
p,m pi N Napved N peke le a, Vu611,11 C14Hwnr ire unlatched, how •w oil a IM M Any.ktn Library Mawlllbn wed hips LM•17 AeWCI+INn Mai
e whet N " Capital omfte Ml p1 they IN&1 01 the odd C41y Help Wlwme is MI VUba, aril aM IN HqM 1IndAr Wd me 4 r
e9' kr«II w61 flat Ni,g od In wCalrmuallt lump N IM aiml We or t egulrl Past Of Nortry ri amit N M.d.d D+ go,".
A I anGN rmwmrmlm p'' am I 1 yloop Of Pulh ll M rill it tD puce G lmynl lwl w ow Worry us 1s ow 64.11,11 NN ww tested con Fur ptlpotarkn or so
rl My 1KOyIIIna Prafilm MIwm{Npplh[w {pace IN Mldrr
rrt nomuffpepOdra and Wall If /unpurrnn Curve rmprowem, f rani Ind,WUn made 9m[l fool , Ind numpU N Nrk 1. 1 IN IarN m r.04I, inuldiMlbrlN lir *1 47 PC ON qu~M1 INIrar r
0)NAvailable ova
II n 11 11 Vol La 101 li,, 01,. Ins wed pp'I,, P,l an d w u lpmnrl I1nMl his mcnllap gum to la t01 oil Melt wo plane to add mat N
• drrews ,I nw 11. loldI type k4l urf and 0.1.111 IVw, smile Ward hag to lap we rein prof era lk Misr till., IM Los lnfcrcrmanl Ir I yowl A erg "ailed 1 A/nved. IM 15,000
equals all pew
w, pry C,nlwlcnaH ctwbpla will lbe IN cv,wl Clowdln .NI all" Is, o0rl or 11om m,ndod slanEw,
y
die lulus ou In Cpordi.,km a IM Ire Onlwcill hw rou kpN
r1M evi l ell pMkrllrr warecle of Io0Wlllnt are N N YHIed Carr, Iu1cI.OhI rIH tiro N aMa ed roc M {Meg dmnlI N Avaer41d M rIa 1 Pond NMOry N ewes M
ao In IN Ili Aw uNNI tmwwemMl NW. if w"Neuey are Irap ImpaMnl 10 [a r,,1 !M Iwl ill IN times am 1pp MH,l
n,r p, ld„qi+nnmer.bl t he Crary Lou',, n t he ll.nm.y In l zpn.lg 1-110110 nM 01 Fur unv11091 me an Iti' 0 IN IN /rM eve Illy nn aril p,o AI 6i11hM4 NM
e r Ap 1A rile C•mpmml D1.111"g 10 9 / AvI b", Do 10 M 01"I N hurry end iM Poor elk Sol
,rdu'ro IM n rr
O m <e,n ofed la O Nnod of wmusl it Y«rf NI1, eonslruenpn thi o M 1 ore Wit enord 4Nf
Inlhw pill.
L1 . rna no in prrdwl IN mile no+d 11Iw m14 eD1e IN
•<r •m~ r a Iq• ,,.IrorvW Vila nlsn.•p nrwlf a•paffea 01 IM Nvol N NOW scMdulw le Wherein wnnl cep Mee ere IM rI N
a r n•:,m qn gr.wnl pubnr ",a...tsv u+d g.mrpl .epvfnldmp Vial M rN echod IW N Nam unlH IMf11N tl CH O
i.ylD~.hr.rMl aummwMr apmrvariunl ar.rr Deero1<uI I'll set rill we Poetry Ill I'd W CH, 0400 OwMry 1IN PMa is,Udw Mw N to MbwN It Nlh aCpumCH has
n r car (nuhnl ry0 P,r mmw:.l.nn vnobrmrrtl sun r. l L N4 ep dp Nne 0psn N Mq b" If, sun
eMhl and MM m 8 N a IN 1Mxemww co pcerrl *"We, aHn. 11" 00 etude Mw proem n leunkq eM s lfinar dw loon 4r, N
I it k.ncm C.b;rn IdrOA t&,n Advgtuy Cummdl« wN rulm,p iM hhc gbnp IM old trlr tail Dulla rrwN allw ton"ulring IN lerwl kwd, Iran" W IM llblry, wed
If , n,dri, Gunmom,r can Iff,,rd. and bwmrng and ronmg Cr,m M MnwrN 44 edded file 16 t plow Inlw oiled clhno{ IL 1'ospf
an, l n~ 11.1 rlpm. ll yowl will M rcl nl..r I p„ r.ma nWanU 414 hylalanl Ignakol I'm of lM On, N Mnlpn IMI *111
Iwdlnul pep N Ill Ia COP puvpoN I Ind Wit, of Dofun prawn
•rnU am<H, owned Wwl N IN I'll old N NPrpemmelry hr, ow while N 1 ea to 0.41
Hpr SIN IN ,,yi Imlwlment woe'em so Illustrated, and 11 red raltam Mel this Of Of Old IM,Na 10m111Klb1 VI IM Los
.1 11 r
r ell I.Imn, p, wNo1tW br In, Vohs 9wyrgr ahi'l EnlacoiNi c,nlwlcal ClrNr real elNwcl rumllo, Ino" A IM C.I y of Mnlot l Crniw Wwlne war" I11.11 Nvp mn+
J. + II IN Iola r'4 the vrl. wd, cal she hill lapel rev M wad to Dole I,. $il l fig Hot da Mt mar a large Imuunl p, pVbik our N on DrcwnNl 11, Mee bell, Pat I cc a m and
1 N p m
. her p w 1f I unp1r M man Ohio IN old C.IV Hall p,n^a dl NorlM IM munkr N [,l lung
soi d' n rov,nf N4 be,, rood t ,rip D
y "r r d Hu~1 I:y r metal Imprn rphe~4 rM ll pi hill {bl ' rW IwN 41111 Ib het w de0011e, n61ded IpwO led parting w MI
I l p.,s.ar , m I,.,. win row w I~r.fule aril inn r, .nruanl ny an, wunklNl eundmp 1YM ea 1 t«I1I k I Nn mw ewslNN Nets MI 1oM NMm
. r„oil l•aetoo- rr beV Pe r sum nm r aDIw .srJa dung c.mlwl IM city sairei I onto ad 56111101 to IM Frolmmg
Ir.l Mretnpn,rlnl poipwlrMnt /i sp 1150
Y_~ , . r•...r..• .wwrr. r.I
b Q
•
Q
•
r
l i"L
R E S O L U T I O N {
SECTION 1.
In accordance with the Resolution of the City Council adopted
on the 15th day of July, 1986, the following individuals are
hereby appointed to serve as members of the Special Citizens 11
Advisory Committee on Capital Improvements:
Karen Abernathy Elinor Hughes
Hugh Ayer Dave Krause
Geneva Berg Jo Luker
Homer Bly Darla McDade
Bill Brady Jack Miller
Derrell Bulls Allle Miller
Lucy Campbell Rat h
Mike Cam be12 P Morrison
P Clovis Morr}sson, Jr.
Bill Claiborne Bettye Myers
Jake Craven Kathy Orr
Bob Crouch Lisa Patterson
Bill Crouch Fred Patterson
Frank Davila William P. Phillips
Roberta Donsbach Harold Reed, Jr.
George Edwards Larry Reynolds
John Enlow Richard Salazar
Hazel Frederick Joe Short
Robbie Gober Chuck Smith
Bob Gorton Sue Smith
Helen Haley Don Smith
Tom Harpool Benny Snider
John Harris Donna Trammell
Lloyd Hindman Ed Wolskl
Joe Holland Donald Wright
Ann Houston A. E. !+yatt
John Hughes
SECTION 11.
That it shall be the charge of said Committee to make recom-
mendations to the City Council on the manner of implementing the
City's five-year capital iaprovvments plan.
SECTION III.
That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of September, 1086,
•
k~Y
CITY P DENTO,N, TEXAS
• ATTEST: ~ • ~
C OF TON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
e .
ct'
•
r
ISU,L
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Charter of the City of
Denton, Texas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted
a list of recommended capital Improvements to be undertaken in
the next five years; and,
WHEREAS, implementation of the capital improvements plan is
an essential element of the goal of maintaining the quality of
life of the community by providing for the necessary
infrastructure, improvements and services to adequately serve
the community; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be
advisable to create a Special Citizens Advisory Committee to
provide recommendations on the manner of Implementing the
capital improvements plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY
RESOLVES:
SECTION f.
That a Special Citizens Advisory Committee shall be
appointed to make recommendations to the City Council on the
manner of implementing the City's five-year capital Improvements
plan.
SECTION 11.
That the Special Citizens Advisory Committee shall be
composed of such persons of the community as specified by the
Council and shall perform Its functions in accordance with the
intent of this resolution, as directed by the Council.
SECTION Ill,
That this resolution shell become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the /,6_ day of July, I906
0 ALFORD, OA PRO TEM
/CS Y F DESiT ,TEXAS
ATTEST:
,,,,~~yy~~~ • •
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY TA.RY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r
APPROVED AS T'0 LEGAL FORM:
JOE 0. MORRIS, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Br:
1'1107'000PY
No.
Doeembar 13, ISM ~
10 d1clembre do is"
MY of Donlon Sand Mellon
Pudkd do Donlon Elecclon Pars Bores)
SAMPLE BALLOT o
(BOLETA UESTRA)
pwo an 'x' k% tM sgmm bolas nr mistw m kw"We
1M•ay NeA,~oyo}I./IafANpMwo'A"Ncum"0t o
M k INN OW kdka a d, w' "*A qvW* WsNd
rN~~wrVrt !.'lij ~►RY~v~irn wV,~l , L y I.l
IOMYj 0 wtA qi~ 1, Fi 'x~'t{~rr~•.
" M~WNNO.l~If)QNV~oti1rMA>N i+'•'I:.i3n rfj ~~a"'. ,zw",'~-G•
IdN'(ilivt/1E4~' y,, J: .y `,t? 2~ ~ l.r~",~,',~j~.•J, h~
. _ k1D.< ND.~..'.. ~ y . n•q F „ trgt,-y;i'~i t6 ` it,
►aala /i~~l• r f ~tiiy~ h' ~ n t1v. L r
NIIOPO~IIOM NO ~ ~ .
raM1Jl~MatS; '~f111ONittlnlltRM ,a ~ .rul '
*A.y. Ww~!{"r 1 Lip 1J Y ~ 1 `
r
t•, if i 1•~
r l' a< E • #d , ~Y W r
si /AOa •N fl'~IOMlWIN t
"Aw a" COW"
OS1ifDf1 f ID f / Nfx 1► ' f . n e f ~ t' '
FW r< r rM0~06
oia~rra' auw
MMbrPOOMrJIIy
1%
r LJ1 Q
L r)
P1I0"I'OC(1!'1'
PROPOSITION NO. 1
STREETftV NMFITPnONnJtA*nCCONTROL
w, wotn a,w~rw
ws w anw r",ft.. 1 SUN
Lpittit /i.4~ ,w+~\ 1 dm= totes p.4elym
~P° "11°r"1ia''mme PROPOSITION NO. 3
~IJt 05%04, 'L-W"boa*ne ,dhow ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXPAN8;ON1
Tim W 7V r4f tl.\ 1fe e4.me '
wrr4ma C4•nr bOrW.
Ld~r4A 4. t4rMn
14,I,I,pw tYL4~ I IM,Aa
wet on
vombo" 4 NI . t.,«.w. pub PROPOSITION NO.4
4rae e+4we erre.l MCC FIRE STATION) AND Ft,01119Mt(T
ry.,,,r frtl4: rfp„ry,t~ar„r,p i
m, wl►re
i~ la bra ri asrh
N1eL ` ; i Ift'm
/.Y lwf leek /4r OMM. f .w. I ,
swtl~r'"" IaM11 i i` iF0 O>f1 1
C T
OntitY~al ' 4I '~"r 4
M
. MGM McAM.bMV.Ir P{1A , { 4~ ~i f f ~ ~ ,
r,t J r• 4 ~q'~'~~51, v T x! 4Y t pr i
1.4 4 r 11 i 4+~
WiMA Itl4e lab y, 16\R~4'N~ 'r4, !L s
*up Y n~
V~r wM ~wI+M4M. C~}7'
IM ~iI.*MII~
t y~ y ,~+tk
, r yr , . f
41, '
►M11etMOt~k1►i11114~►rrtw,EYew ;.r~ ~*„I' M !~~`R° hf r a /
VOL
PN.NQ.l,
wM t F , 7 r ~';'jlelll
he~1ow*0 FwpP~
1w on
Oak"
r...rl... a +ww
nrlM ~ Y / t C M~AI I
w/Aie4 w44/~IY\y,IIYe r. I . ( w/r'I. ' akk~~ ~y~~ Sy ~~I ~ it>~ ~ ~ 1
iw nr/4r b*4v t/!UI\, r e lfr "I^^"M' Qe 1 x t r I'~fWx.
~►~4 41M►I44~ 1Alk, r,~r~ f
R ~ 4 t • ; l1 Ilk a~ Ct f,
f ~~4 'Ivy i. l
ay
0
a
0
r
1
G•
ti
O
Voter's Guide:
22 QUESTIONS
8z ANSWERS
about your bond Issue
Denton City Coundl
Blue Albbon Citizen's
• Advisory Committee
Punning at Zoning Commiss
J .t r
o ~ , o
0
0
•
i
TO THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF OENTON:
The December 13, 1988 bond election for the pro-
posed five year capilal improvement program Is one of
the most crucial issues facing cur community today. We
have responded to twenty,two questions that appear to
be particularly important while realizing that every ques-
tion' Mno matter how any of those Questions were asked by members of
the City Council, Citizen's Blue Ribbon Advisory Com•
millee and Planning and Zoning Commission upon In*
filial review of the recommended program. Several public
hearir tense gpla have eandhstu dy, sour groups unanimously
agree that all seven propositions and each specific pro
Jack is needed 10 help solve problems that exist today. also Imp oeementprogramhasbeen structured sothalnoad-
dillonal increase in the tax levy Is required to fund the
entire program,
e'hope you will study the taco carefully and vote
W
Sincere thanks and appreciatioe,emOPr 13.
S
! / 11 4
Ray Stephens, Mayor
Hugh Ayer, Chairman
Citizen's Blue Ribbon Advisory Committee , s r
/
e ~1
Bill Claiborne, Chairman 1 i^~; " ,y
Planning and Zoning Commission r
BOND ELECTION
OUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
0 "I Is e.lne proposed Sole +01.01
A. On Decernntr $3. IDee, It rtginned refers in the City of Denton will
haw a LMnct to decide Orrin Mr a 21 ? mllliun door C01*1 Imprar
rient program should bo epprored.
I
what N t Dep1YI Imprortm eoll pro"ml r
pro ed, p mde uppfadedr lend belief runolsonllrp pvDik limpaie Imr+le
IVCh as 1116411, 11a 11C signals, fire and poliCS 18 1111164 and Nulpmml, I
skeolli nnlallC livid* nnghborhood and sai Citizen centul, and
dranage
two
whe decld64 which pertltvlar pr9164te r Pr"nf D r ona Don1 4S we V W Mxhrb
ad le Ind rM Year Carl" Imprew"ani pegnm l
The final dacluon is made br tM Gay Covncll, Toe Pisnoing and zonli
ro
Gomm~rlion mitiHp ins IfvfYam copllal Imprdromtht piano! p '
case once a iear fly 1onCillna end co0akrinq MSd1 aprseeod In
d,.Iduai uliure, the general pubnc,and mlareertd groups represdir g
pyr nt;pntoorl'ooi oommunNY 0rgaalznl0ns, and bufineeset 71,116
Yeu IM Otte" ounGll toll IMI mpe Clifton Invotgmenl was needed and
a 51 person nun laNtCRltr~GOUaeU, was lwoi it"
m Surd Plans ng and zoi Ui
- ,aAin bon Gam
a Pt all all,sed an IM City Co VMe Ilut will to rated an in Std 11rtd
How win iwi tM Itrlaaaedl
H VA gpllat holprerareenl Proanla
II the poposl11one ers apporto by yr mire, eonrel t=ig
ponds w111 to fold and Ine prptaedo 01 "bond Was ■HI ee YW'~ i i
I,nanct the p,011KIt, TradltloMHy, tM CItItYM hall Men Ileaod (0 t * I
poll Dosed nsuu for CAPlel ImpalmM6 about Wiry l„ AI Y
in line with me~nodoira Selo l0 b "I paceew ll, our up+ ll lnoedlrlAValtY IM only
0 O
•
a
•
Will IM 21.F million "Ian be epee on at once? s
No. 14 21 If million dolls re *1 11 fund a fl w year D rog ram and a Damon at
iM aulhcrlM DOnds will be told facts year. The final ponds tow not W
Sold until 10
How win ml lean W elfeclM N IM anon 71.1 million dollar problem h
ePProved?
Currerlry. 271 or One air roe lery 01 As per 1100 valuation i1 dev0lod
l0 wrd rlbremanl of as sting 0601 The 21.2 million dollar bond iNUs
her been Jlruclu4d so that there win be no increase in this evi
Tnq enure Program Can De approved wrlhoul 0 lee mcraase
Mow ern wt Dt ton that the money will be used la its amended pup.
Poles N the broposoll an apPrease?
The City COWCII hill tueady stall a resolullon that establishes a
scac al C11isnI mortaring board. Members of the Slue Fiction
Citizen I li COmmdlee will 04 OPPCIMIOd 10 the board because
Ihey a*1 mOSI IamdiAr wrln the Dialects This citizens grOUD toll remain
m ple0e o161 Iha 111110 We of Ina program and a slat,$ and prOgres4
report will as made Pubhcy et 10411 once 1 year or more often it in,
need arises.
Akin' we recently apprevs a begat league fer ShM sal
Yee A 10 million dollar elreet pngram was approved in j%4. Many of '
the great Improvemenla nave been moos and the program Ia conti l
arco,amll to schedule,
i
le IM proP0lal to to routa Ill Arenue Included M IM 1'featl and Mflk j
prot70eltlont l
No MPwlver, Its Capita! Improvement Program includel funds to e
rebuild amhfing Buell Avenue In 111 Present location from VIVO }load 10
Univemly Drive. AUO, it it felt that II Avenue Inllic will be Partially
relieved by soma Of the OPrer traffic Improvement propONls in ten bond
issue, including extension of Nottingham Drive and Improvements It,
M.020 Road,
Will the city pay the total coal of Improm,~to $0 state and federal
roads such as leap 20& D.S. 2T? (pan worth Density lied D.S. Sad (USI" •
Illy DnaelT s
No. The U33M-US, 777 end LOOP 254 I110rW101Vnto Can be paid for in ; t
such a way IMI 91but 14 90 of Stelag or Federal Hiplwly Funds will tie t« t
spans on the Project for wary 6100 Contributed try Me CltVol Denton.
Nato wars 1M epfclpt MlrlagO Prgech soteeled7
The dmiroge Moiscte men salKted based on Immodtals needs end the ;
p0lori Impact on Ins greeted number of relid"Jo. On pact, all Pro ~f x
leaf Included In the program lit this descnptlon.
. r .7
Pone Ddo we epanm mood eMhsl Sam r into IN nnwated~a2d~ KID NWMV1
the Pollee Depanmenl moved Into IM ranovalagd old City Hill building
in 19U 9. That was 1 cri6Cal read fa Crests Mora All and OFlco space
as quickly as DOJJIOIe Conditions have Improved, however, sit or this
SCOCI 11 IM Iid City Nall building VI cl uesble area end the building
I sac f was n0! it l q •ed to ICCOm mod6h some cf I M speclll naade 01 a
Pollee DrDenr}hml Lack 011WCO Is still t efobhnl In 14"1 of bolh Pulp
'
rOhl and futywa needs Since tySt, ten number of officers and total W.
sooner has Increased or" 75 to 104 and there WO Piano to add Mon ofnctis to past; pact will our public solely needs. rho Law 11101colrent
CamferlCOUn Cori will 90114 IM currentMating Problem and hen.
dIt lutuee geowll Coor0lnatlon of the law onforeement and mumieipU
Cowl functions *111 8160 be enhanced.
11 it 4100 Imponan110 Con Oder In* IKI that the
rM~p pMlon of [his pro
lack wirl not ran unlit tggt. TM ON111111 Pollca Feclnty will Mvl Doha
used la a period of almost 10 years paled OOnelMChon begins On this
Orelecl
Sul what SOON hool to the old city MIN SuN Me Poke Dopi
rent moves le a law [nfsroomMM COnIsdCourt ompi
FanOvlbng IM old city hall building pnasnsd and svlded life to a
valuable and hill0ncalty significant also} of ten Clty of Denton that will
cchtinue to De used fp City purpoea/. The City of Denton prssoli
e
Family Pon City nd 4 Is contain tha tthi s Ipl M04 wilt l chafe COnilruNl~on 0 ~ theO LAW
Enlaument ContanCotm MPIIM would eriow City Purtthha such so
• mo e I loe the olld City pi euildl Oa Mo~ ep he mumUpailewn fund
l
bons wilt 6160 free UP desPerelely headed apace and Peeing at IN
Municipal S,IIding
l
"All
1
r
Why In addlllauf ntnelldn sen4n leeda07 f
There are
r present
s Oly Iwo rocs ign call In dte northwest and
Southwest areas Oily
1 the city. NISri growth Mt ocCU"ed in IM Wfw
In CM m mulate',mumand southeast The two asbNeq cen4n an boll
tran nq
, Ind many Mlldren and Others Ihel cannot welt' 0r ryrb
Spo"Arom are being left out, Approval of the bond Issue will allow
Ins Chy 10 Il a recession CamiR 10
community NM each VN W Our
Why to apenaion *1tM So nice CNleerw Cmlw ho ...W
Cenlo a olderly pop,lalion COnfnual to grew and diamonds. fa spay.
and Ituwnisa justify t4 Maroon, A I+rga mulls-purpose
torn, gonna room. alto end crafts a from and kit.
roam room, MNU P. nlnqesFOi fpanalon MaNOq
, and offices are 04nnN at pee of IM pro it
the ba locndiedal ar Domino lot park Ds Club u will and cubicle atllrlt4a will sls.0 f» providedand
bit allowed la mope Into the facility,
Why an IMN alhrslk dead Impnvamanla gl"$slryT
S`O otOnffs
tiMtUtreedp' limited alhlatk P601114111, and 1I this Ilex, thee} fields
ire S wllh tea room err lutun hDeneion. Conlin at1O M t foal"
4cditiN Shan Lewnvllle, Cenolllon, Or other oftlee 01 comparable Ilse
Ind tbond Ij sue wOUld provide enough funds to Ilghl Pow (11 o eDad
ball fall to MNM%,elmpro ingrfie d No 7, and developingcNsid No q,
Four (1)fghtsd Softball fields and liva ip ta[1r fields, 0M of which wlll
be lighted 0111 be developed at North Laaa1 p1nL Two (27 fns Softball
fa1d1 wlll Dt Improwwd and two M KKoer NOWS will a* d0
r .marg. TheN Imp"Mema will atl0w for Ire growth of thraoirrtal
I
An adraltfontl free Iloilo" end egr*WN M his lolled ke
ep~~
Weeny IM 0"Rrucd" of another stair" 'hot has pt it he Pr
proved In a prlAUtr1 sk I aleetlenT be Du1N e}
Yee. Funds ware approved fir an Idditfonel Rol ion In IOU The rtoMy
HsluIdn anNaNsc0unhot Ind IM ItNtl0n sell be con llrueled In INB, A roc"f
Y wn IM need of two Net valianS In Order tO OoTpy wry f
netianal anndardl jar COWnge and 1 rea00nN II"N Of 710 INny1H,
tht bond laaua will provide funds fa 1 Second Stallon that w0u
De built in to" The two Mw Stations will be id Vitro
haled In tM ^C+thwN1
and IoulnNSI areas a, It* CI, r,
The exll::7 AnM41 Central Center rH Dul% and ddOUplad he 11M; whir
w
do we needto $spend pt' I$MKY le to"T
The number of Sm"1111 SMhened at the Cams, hot Increased On an
aversCe
19A5-Eft. 01 a5X Nr yen nsWtinq fn a total of 0,224 an test aced gi d In
TM center's cIDICItY n rated R only 4200 NjmRs qt' thew,
The animals are Doing e11001ad 10 Crowded and inadequate Conditions
and Staff prddur lhllY 1%Nwenly llm'ded 111 result.
Why sa w4 head mss Merely spots? .
7114 American Library association and 74111 Library Alsaiatjdn have
determined that 75 Ipuere feet of 110rary Space I$ needed per 111re0n,
Our library has 24000 Square feet and based on Ow pOpeTSM" of pro.imelely R!,000. a 10111 01 17,2M squad f ed! of Ipa[e 4 nHf a.
ap '
Fun01 for an ydlDa+11 10,000 equal seat IMt will not be histlable have
to ! years II Nl,g requested , 11 approved, IM 76000 aquaee Fc01 aolal
will Rllt fall Short of reCOmmanded standards
Will the:pfroee
the lunch 6, In Aa ed ryTbo Npendad « rtif 1 branch NDryrp >te bunk r
IM
At this time e.palo bee Of the awletinp Ilbrery and the Dearth Concept
Ra both good Ideas. The ONIC lead is for mare IpD~e the Initial phase
phase II not Schedufled scheduled o D4irt onballMtlgp r t~ and IM Filet
dMldod IMt it is DU1V IO 0`40 Dvlh aI a Cduncq has
Clow time 00 afAir how growth 4 ocaurrl open as this 11"14 this will
III altar conlulhnq the LiDr 111rd I final d"llon"A be
Olhar interested ail iaene end pro p~ and, do"$ of IM Library, and
whom 00 1 go is vote?
A' D14 o city mbar er t7 Damon bCNIC e. . cant
on 0a emr bull"O baled atm721 E MCKInMy
, 1986, ta" Nn 'I'm . Ind 700 p,
Who Can f 0"4c, M I MM nldrs gwad"11D/Inf %+1 DOnA NaW}
please contact the city Maria It Oflke a1 588
I'd Oowaloitm4n1 01pol eel It yeB Akre, Or IM fNannIng
i
•
- O
O
r
1
a
city oC Dencon
Five Year Capital Improvement Program
14000.000
'.:YAA00
Absentee Iu~~
Voting le,ytocpo
Municipal Building 9 $4400"
215 E. McKinney siwixm
Nov. 24-Dec. 9 hoMAW
8 a.m.-5 P.M.
Izwoooo
Monday through Friday Izaoaooo
It,wa,ooo
I+,aooport
ISO4aoo
1
1 tcm~ roes-0e gee~9
. Faecal Year tt790-Ot
+ e r
~ ~ ...r..... aawl Mrs on..
0v
i
I
4
•
I~ 40
i
o ~
• c^ PLC , - f ig A4 e_r l ao~w
• ,~~,u cc~ A~-.`A P cnrco Sk' pPpor ~
lrNOaGi b0.SCLI ,
f
• C. 41 c c CO. - ~+xl~Cl ~oQ Out Is
L-7 Cl i cow-.,P,
z
0% a
ciryof DEWON TEIUS MUNXC AL 6U!~CSN' "'.y~,,
r CDO / DfNrdA;~AAS 78701 /TELEPHONE (917) 5E8•8907
office of fde Cify Manager
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Catherine E. Tuck, Administrative Assistant
DATE: February 10, 1993
SUBJECT: 1986 Bond Issue History
In anticipation of the Capital Improvement Program, city staff had
been preparing needs for a bond issue for some time before the 1986
bond issue went to the voters. Staff had identified needs and had
a list of potential projects ~Faiting for funding,
in 1985, the voters had approved a $10 million street bond election
to build approximately 14 1/2 miles of street and repair an
additional 20 miles of street. However, this did not meet all of
the street needs nor did it address any other city needs.
blue Aibben CIP cit1m1A Adviaorv Oga.ittes
in July 1986, the City Council passed a resolution creating a
special citizen advisory committee to provide recommendations on
implementing the City's five year capital improvement plan as
proposed by the Planning and zoning commission. A committee of
fifty-one citizens was appointed in September with Hugh Ayer as the
leader of the group which came to be known as the Blue Ribbon
citizens CIP Committee.
Proieot selection
Five sub-committees were formed to study the five separate parts
• of the CIP. The sub-committees were as follows and wcre chaired
by the following persons:
Streets/Traffic Jack Miller
Drainage Bill Claiborne
Library/Law Enforcement/ Court Joe Holland
Athletic Fields/Neighborhood and • 0
O Senior Citizens Center Kathy Orr
Animal Control Center/Fire Station Bob Gorton
The sub-committees began with the city's five-year Capital
Improvement Plan. %ring three weeks of intensive study, each sub-
committee held many meetings, conducted fact gathering
• 0
0
c~
0
consultations, and made numerous field trips. The five sub-
committees met with citizens and city staff to determine the needs
in each of these areas. Final reports were drafted by each sub-
committee in early October. The reports were pared down slightly
and submitted to the full Blue Ribbon Committee on October ll.
A report of the proposed bond issue from the Blue Ribbon Committee
was presented to the City council on October 21, 1986. The process
that the committee used was explained as well as how the projects
were narrowed down and placed into each year of the five-year s
program. Additionally, the Blue Ribbon Committee suggested that
E*w a citizen committee be formed to ensure that the bonds are a
spent according to the use approved by the voters. The bond issue
was also predicated on a no-tax increase promise to the voters.
The City Council called a public hearing for October 28 on the CIP
proposal. On November the City Council passed a resolution
calling a bond election on December 17.
Election Aotivities
Beginning in October, a series of articles were submitted to the
Denton Record-Chronicle each week explaining different aspects of
the citizen committee, CIP process, and bond proposals. The City
Council, Blue Ribbon CIP members, and city staff contributed to
these articles.
The same Blue Ribbon CIP Committee became the election committee
and worked with volunteers on a publicity campaign. Blue Ribbon
Committee members headed different task groups including a
speaker's bureau, fundraising, special interest group
representatives, media representative, public relations, letters
from Council Members, and open houses. A list of the
responsibilities of each of these task groups is attached.
A fact sheet and a slide show were prepared. A speaker's bureau
was organized and citizens spoke to service groups and a host of
other community and special interest groups. Each special interest
group was also a-signed a citizen to meet with the group and ensure
that information was provided. Special interest groups were
subdivided into athletic groups, senior citizens and retirement
centers, Humans Society, Friends of the Library, Domino Club,
ministers, Benefit League, and drainage homeowners, The special
interest task group made sure that leaders of the interest groups
were informed, coordinated "get out the vote" drives, and sort a
post card campaign.
p Another group of citizens worked on fundraising efforts. This + a
group finalized a budget and raised funds to accomplish the tasks
outlined in the budget. The media representative coordinated media
coverage and recruited individuals to write letters to the editor.
Media representatives were briefed on the bond proposal and the
publicity campaign. A press conference was hold on November 17
explaining the availability of speakers, announcing the open
i
0
houses, and recruiting volunteers. The Public Relations group
developed campaign materials.
City Council Members also launched a letter writing campaign to
encourage individuals to vote yes for the bond proposal. The x
Council wrote personal letters to citizens from the list of voters
in the last election. Typing was coordinated for this effort. The
open house committee ensured publicity and coordination of two open
houses at each of the facilities targeted for expansion: the
Library, Police Station, and Animal Control center. '
The bond election was held on Saturday, December 13. Approximately
2,100 citizens voted. The ballot had seven propositions and each
one passed.
IIroDO_ s"Al margins
Streets/Traffic 4:1
Drainage 4.1
Animal Control Center 2:1
Fit.,) Station 4.1
Athl.~3tic Fields/Neighborhood
and Senior Centers 2:1
Library 2:1
Law Enforcement/Court 01
Dr. Ayer felt that the success of the 1986 bond election was the
broad offering of propositions. There were items on the election
that were important and beneficial to most every citizen in Denton.
Additionally, the Blue Ribbon Committee concentrated a large part
of its efforts on selling the proposals to specific interest
groups. That helped ensure that citizens would be out to vote for
at least the specific proposition of interest to them and would
hopefully vote on all the other issues as well, Dr. Ayer also felt
strongly that the idea of a "watchdog" citizen committee gave
everyone confidence that the bonds would be spent the way they were
outlined in the proposals. The voters must be able to count on the
city to spend the funds for the projects approved by the citizens.
This is a summary of activities coordinated to ensure the passage
of the 1986 bond election. Attached please find copies of the
resolutions appointing the Blue Ribbon CIP Committee, the bond
proposals, questions and answers about the bond olection, task
force responsibilities, election activities, and a timeline of
activities.
Please advise if I can
provide additional information.
c 4.a
Catherine ~E. Tuck
Administrative Assistant
•
•
jl` ;i NOY 1510
October 28, 1991
Mr. Jerry Clark
215 E. McKinney -
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr. Clark,
Several months ago I sent you a Survey questJonnaire
regarding your city's latest bond election. I want to thank
you again for your input, and I am sending you the completed
paper summarizing my findings.
This information gas compiled from nine cities in the
metroplex. I hope you will find it useful.
The paper has been submitted to X4~Town for
publication and will be in their December 1991 ed!tion. If
you wou1= like any more information or more detail, please
contact No and I will be happy to provide it.
Again, thank you for your participation.
Sincerely,
MeryE11 iff, F. Mikes
1634 Clarendon Drive
Lewisville, TX 75067
(214) 221-3841
•
Q
•
r
I
Strategies for Winning Voter Support for Bond Referenda
b} MaryEllen F. Miksa
This article is based on a paper prepared for a course on
Finsr:cial Accountability in Governmento offered as a part of
the Masters in public Administration progra~ at the
I' Universtiy of Korth Texas.
p
0
INTRODucTION
When A Texas city decides to issue general obligation
bonds to find city improvements, it faces the problem of
convincing its citizens to vote "yes." Asking voters to bock
increased services or capital improvements with tax dollars
is akin to gelling a preluct sight unseen. Many voters have
a problem "buying" on faith, especially in tough economic
times.1 Lawrence W. Pierce likens a bond election to a blind
date. The results of saying "yes" will not be known
immediately. Additionally, he rays, bond elections have an
aura of mystery about them that. Jurisdictions must take the
time to diEpel.2
For this study, 58 individuals who participated in bond
task forces in nine cities were surveyed to answer the
following questions: How did these cities go about securing
"yes" votes from their citizens? What did they do right, and
just as important, what did they fail to do? How many
propositions should the ballot have? What tactics must be
used and which ones lead to failure? Finally, how much time
does it take to educate the voters on the bond propositions?
Results show similarities in the strategies used to
promote a bond referendum. There were also some surprising
differences. I realize that no general conclusions can be
drawn from a limited sample of nine, yet there is still much
Y we can learn from their experiences.
t
0
to
0
GETTING TO "YES"
The targeted individuals in the cities surveyed realize
the importance of informing the voterE. A few individuals
said that the bond propositions should be written by the
citizen's bond task force with guidance only from the city
council and city staff.
Under Texas law, the city staff may not actively promote
a bond referendum, nor can there be any use of public funds
to advertise. The city staff merely provides information
(i.e., facts and figures) and the citizens solicit
contributions from community groups and business
{
organizations to pay for supplies and advertising. The city
belongs to its taxpayers. They are the people who decide
I
whether or not they will go into debt and If they will back
that debt with higher tares.
Cities have used mane tactics to reach their voters--
everything from buttons and T-shirts with slogans, to slick
professionally printed brochures, to paid consultants,
Penelope Lemov, has identified eight wily waya to win a
bond referendums: "make people aware of what is going on; make
a clear statement of purpose; develop a good track record;
•
educate the voters on the issues; gain support of the
government agencies affected by the bond; distribute the
bond's brnefits throughout the area; finance the bond
• campaign adequately; and work with the hews media to gain
their support (riot to mention free publicityl,"J After
surveying the nine cities, I would add one more strategy--
2
i
make sure the city council publicly supports the referendum,
MAKE A CLEAR STATEME'Nr OF PuRPOSL:
The bond task forces in all nine cities realized the
need to educate the voters. Yet a successful bond referendum
revolves around more then Just education; it depepds op
con~1~cin~g_ votc~g_of _e ~~e41.._
The necessity of taking on debt must be clear. If the
voters do not understand the propositions or are not
thoroughly educated on the need for the improvements, the
bond referendum is doomed to failure. One task force
volunteer said, "Our bond election failed because a very
small but active anti-tax group put out a pamphlet on the day
of the bond vote that was full of outright lies and half-
truths. Since it was too late to find out what the facts
were before voting, voters took the safe way out and turned
it down. Very few people who vote actually know the facts of
tho issue they are voting on." Apparently, the task force
hnd not sufficiently or thoroughly made their case with the
voters. To wit, they had not presented a clear statement of
purpose. If they had, an eleventh hour pamphlet would not
have been able to sway voters to the extent it did.
Another important point is to stress the benefits to
citisens from the bond package. When presenting their bond
package, one city surveyed in this study included a new city • •
hall because of staff overcrowding. One bond task force
Volunteer stated that they should have stressed a more
3
•
0
•
efficient, service oriented f9cility for citizens. Many
citizens will value improving the services to themselves but
will riot attach too much importance to the comfort of staff.
GETIING THROUGH TO VOTERS
The methods for educating voters in a bond referendum
are similar to the methods used In any election. However, a
bond election, if passed, takes on a more lon4-term
obligation than electing someone to city office. Citizens
cannot take back their votes or change their minds and not
back the debt.
All of the respondents in this study realize that
community leaders are the best resource in educating voters.
If citizens put together a bond package and claim ownership
of it, other citizens have more faith in it. All the
1
respondents suggest involving a citizen bond committee from
the start. They suggest that the need for facilities and
improvements be stressed. Most respondents stressed the
importance of showing both aides of the debate and the
estimated tax impact so that it does not appear as though the
city is hiding something.
All of the nine cities took full advantage of the media,
•
especially public service newspaper articles and letters to
the editor. Among the respondents, five cities used paid
newspaper advertising and three of these had ICOX of their
• total bond package approved. On the other hand, of those • •
solely using free news articles, only one city had all of
its propositions approved. These results do not definitively
4
r.~~a..w. -J... ...y , • rrr~~M~. IY.li~f nirlr 1
p
show that a city is more successful with paid advertising.
One council member from a city using paid advertising said
she would not use that method again. She believes that
letters to the editor get more attention and, of course, are
free.
DEVELOP A GOOD TRACK RECORD
Developing a good track record means not gust delivering
what you promise but delivering it on time as well. This
reputation will help with voter trust. "When you build
something, whether it is a coliseum or a school, and folks
see the project is effective and sufficient, they have
confidence to vote for a bond issue the next time around."4
TAKE TIME TO EDUCATE THE VOTERS
Educating the voters as to the necessity of a bond issue
takes varying amounts of time. Based on '.he responses to
this survey, voter education takes anywhere from one to
fourteen months depending on the complexity of the issues,
Most respondentr recommended two to four months. They
cautioned not to take so long that your message loses Its
punch. Moat of the respondents (76%) believf- that the time
it takes to educate the public as directly related to the
difficulty of the issues acid the number of propositions on
• the ballot. .
S
r~.~... ~r~._.~ 1 Y y~ur~YWLfy', • i.Y - 1 ~
1
•
v
a
e
FORMULATING THE BOND PACKAGE
The bond package 1s the "candidate" running for
election. The composition of this package will contribute
largely to its success or failure.
The cities surveyed held their bond elections between
1984 and 1991, The average number of propositions in these
packages was eight. When asked if they believed that a city
could overwhelm voters with too many issues, 43% responded
affirmatively.
In addition to the number of propositions, several
respondents offered these sugveations: group like issues
together; do not try to put popular issues in the same
proposition with unpopular ones. One task force member
said, " lone) proposition failed because it combined the
expansion of the Senior Citizens Center (a popular project)
with an outdoor swimming pool Ian unpopular project)."
Another important factor is to distribute the bond's
benefits throughout the area, It is easier to win a bond
referendum when the benefits are geographically distributed,
Citizens like tn think that there is something for everyone,
When formulating a bond package, one respondent
• recommended keeping quality-of-life issues such as parks,
libraries, and public buildings separate from atreot and
drainage issues, In tough economic times voters gat bogged
down with the qualJty-of-life issues and vote "no" on • •
•
meceasitIea, surf as infrastructures.
6
i
p
i
r
The committee building the bond package must take
ownership of the package and present it as the commnunity's
propositions, They should keep from putting In too many
issues that resemble a "wish list."
Finally, the committee should break down each
proposJtlon's tax impact for a home of average value for
that community. Such a breakdown is more easily understood
by the average citizen. One survey respondent noted that
"voters always have some hesitancy to 'give city hall a blank
check,' Knowing the cost of each item may prevent voters
Inclined to be negative on several propositions from turning
down all [of theml."
TIMING
Timing is another important factor in the decision to
hold a bond referendum. A city should avoJd scheduling a
bond election during a general election. With all of the
campaign literature distributed during this time', the
information for a bond election Is likely to go unnoticed. A
city also should check with overlapping governments to
Ascertain when they plan to schedule a bond election. Too
mnny elections asking for citizens to pledge tax dollars for
long-term debt in the same time frame will certainly doom one
or all of them to failure. In addition to watching for other
0 elections, a city should avoic' holding a referendum i
immediately preceding or following major holidays, such as
Christmas, when people are very aware of money and how much
7
O d ,
1
o
e
r i
they are spending.
WHAT WORKS
Most respondents stressed the need for community
involvement, But how does a city go about soliciting 1
{
involvement? First, it involves recruiting respected
community leaders who can get the job done and inspire
others. Forming committees and allowing them to form the
propositions will help motivate citizens to push for
something they believe in. This incentive generates
enthusiasm for the referendum, and the citizens then can
approach voters with excitement. Some cities formed a
speakers' bureau that targeted civic organizations that held
regular monthly meetings to ensure that they would have an
audience. Some cities found that word of mouth, "Dear
Friend" notes and friend to friend contact, encouraged voters
to vote
One respondent said that their success stemmed from
"carefully do-.-eloped propositions that are known to have a
strong basis of support, Do not try to sneak in things that
are promoted only by some small interest group, Our
carefully selected, 60-member, community-wide task force was
• a mmJor reason for our success." The citizens directly
affected by the issue or those with a vested interest, then
"become conscientious about explaining the bond to the
e general public in very real, not abstract, terms," , •
r
8
,
Q
•
t
WHAT DOES NOT WORK
The respondents from one city admit that they made a
mistake in assuming that all propositions would pass. They
had a weak to non-existent advertising program, Other
respondents advise, "stay away from slick hype, pushiness,
and 'cute' promotional gimmicks." Another respondent says a
bond issue may fail if it appears to be staff endorne.i. The
bond package must be in the city'a best interest. The
individual citizen should be able to see what he/she will be
gaining from it. Without this reassurance, the bond
referendum will likely fail.
Support of the city council is critical to success,
One city council in the survey chose to provide no overt
support for their referendum. In the words of one
respondent, "as a city councilman, I did not fee] 1 should
endorse any particular issue, but (,just) encourage the
vote." The civic leaders went to considerable expense in
printing fancy trochures and even hired a consultant to help
promote the bond issue. However, without support from the
council, the referendum was doomed before It began. The
research found that this city's council members believed it
• to be unethical to "stuiap" for the referendum. The council
did not promote the referendum one way or the othe.~i they
merely explained what each proposition was to do, Taxpayers
• will hardly feel confident to vote for something that the
council is neutral on,
This city has learned a valuable lesson. After only 26%
4
• 0
I
i
•
i
y ~
}F
Of the propositions passed, the bond steering committee made
the following recommendations to the council: "The council
needs to give clear direction on the size of the total
program and needs to actively support the propositions; do
not hold the election following the Christmas holidays; keep
citizens involved throughout the process (not just at the
needs identification phase); have fewer propositions,
possibly with more frequent elections; and promotional effort
should be planned from the beginning. At least 60 days is
needed to adequately promote the referendum."
CONCLUSION
Selling A bond referendum takes money, time,
expertise, and commitment on the part of all Involved. A
city's citizens Are its most valuabJe resource. They hold
the purse strings And they also wield the influence to sway
their neighbors to vote Affirmatively. The respondents to
the survey used many similar tactics. They all agreed on the
use of respected community leaders to form a "Slue Ribbon
TAsk Force," They all agreed on the use of newspaper
articles and mAny have found that it is not necessary to pay
for advertising. The most successful strategies used were
• those that planed the community leaders at the forefront
stressing improved services and better conditions for each
and every citizen. The 1eAst successful were those that
singled out a specific group, were flashy, slick or full of
s ~ •
gimmicks, and appeared to be for the benefit of the city
staff and not the citizens.
10
• 0
•
p
•
r
of
E N D N O T E S
1. Lewis, Geoffrey, Puka.iSeln_t,uni_SRC_l4S_42, 4Rti'etiimgni,
(Business Books, London) 1973, p, vlil
2. Pierce, Lawrence W. "Selling the bond before the bond
Sale: Elements of a Successful Bond Referendum"
4Q~SLtSBent Fin~RS_c k~Yl~~, June, 1987, p. 7
3. Lemov, Penelope, "How to Win (or Lose) A Bond
Referendum," ~,ogeCIIing, February 1990, p. 34
4. Ibid.
•
e ~ e 41
11
.
c►
0
k
8 December 1486
Editor
Denton Record-Chronicle
Denton, T% 76201
Dear Editor: {
The capital improvement program which voters will have an
opportunity to approve in Saturday's bond election is of vital
importance to the future of Denton. However, the program is
designed to address current conditions rather than to meet
future needs. Every item in the proposed list of improvements
will either correct an existing problem or fill an immediate
need.
The streets, traffic and drainage projects all address current
needs of critical dimension, as do the proposed expansion of the
library, administrative facilities, and animal control center.
Existing athletic fields are severely overburdened; the senior
citizens' center is overflowing; and community centers are
non-existent in three major population areas of the city.
Expanded firefighting facilities and equipment are essential to
both personal and economic security--and to the maintenance of
reasonable insurance rates.
A great amount of thought and study went into the development
of this program, which has the unanimous endorsement of a
fifty-one member citizens' committee, the Planning and Zoning
Board, and the City Council, Scheduling of the various projects
over the next five years was carefully planned so the previously
approved tax rate will be sufficient to service the debt.
Furthermore, to insure that the bond funds are expended for the
designated projects, the Council has appointed a six member
citizens' committee to monitor the individual projects and make
an annual report to the connunlty.
An affirmative vote for all seven propositions on December 13
will enable the city to address a variety of existing problems,
and thus help to maintain the quality of life that we all expect
Denton to provide.
51n erel ,
X71, 0_ a AIN
CIP i tizens CowrMano
l ttee
r. 0
•
ry
t
L
PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL, 21 OCT. 1986
I
1. Introduction
II. Thanks to--
A. Committee Members
B. City Staff
C. 6 Especially to the 5 sub-committee chaits-- 1
1. Jack Miller Streets 6 Traffic
2. Bill Clairborne Draina;e
3. Joe Holland Libtary/City Hall/Law Enforcement/Court
4, Kathy Orr Athletic Fields/Neighborhood 6 Senior C%tizen Centers
5. Bub Gorton Animal Control Center/Fire Station 6 Fjuipment
111. Review of Procedures
A. Organizational Meeting, Sept. 4
1 Received charge
2. Agreed on 5 sub-committees
3. Set calendar of deadlines
B. Sept, 4-30 a period of intensive work--meetinga,
field trips, informatiun gathering, discussion, etc.
C. Sub-Committee Repc.ts all in by Oct. 2 studied, reviewed, etc.
D. Met with Manager 6 Staff, Oct. 8
E. Met with Sub-Committee Chairs, Oct. 8 —recommendations
to reducing dollars and revising annual schedule.
• Unanimous agreement.
F. Full Committee Meeting, Oct, 13 much diocussion,
questions, etc.
UNANIMOUS AGREEMENT,
G. Presented to Planning 6 Zoning, Oct. 15--Ataln much
• discussion, questionind followed by UNANIMOUS APPROVAL • 0
THUS, THE REPORT I SUBMIT TO YOU THIS EVENING HAS 1HC
CAREFULLY CONSIDERED AND UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT OF BOTH
THE CITIZENS' COMMITTEE AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD,
e
0
Ya
p.2
1V. Review of Recommended Capital Improvements Program
A. General Comments
1, No fluff or padding--all items are badly needed to
maintain the quality of life that Denton has come'
to represent,,.,
2. Need to remember that we are talking about a program
that will not be completed until well into the '90s
Our recommendations are very sim?',: to the CIF
originally proposed by P 6 2--but with some changes
4. Total A.mountr 21.637 million, 510K lower than P 6 1. plan
BUT WELL WITHIN LIMITS SET BY FINANCE DIRECTOR
FOR SERVICING WITH THE 591 TAX RATE.
5. The scheduling of projects over the five-year period
is based on three important considerations--
a. Priority needs (eg „ Community Center for S.E. Denton)
b. State Flans (eg. Loma Del Rey drainage coordinated
with Loop 288 construction)
c. Funding Facts, is established by Director of Finance
'86-871 $3,463,000 (3,500,000)
'87-88t 3,612,000 (3,600,000)
'88-89r 3,615,000 (3,800,000)
'89-903 5,325,000 (4,750,000)
'90-911 5,622,000 (5,500,000)
B. Highlights of Proposed CIP (maybe use transparencies)
1. St:eets 6 Traffic
a. Several new turn lanes
b. Several new signal lights
c. Sidewalks in school areas (Ginnings 6 Evers Park)
d. Major Street/Highway Projects
1) Lillian Miller Pkwy (4 lanes)
1) Woodrow Lane (4 lanes, McKinney to Spencer)
3) Teasley Lane (Dallas Drive to 135--ad4 itional needed) e 0
O 4) Teasley Lane (I35 to Ryan Road 4 lanes State 4-1)
5) Loop 288 (380 to Colorado - 6 lanes- state 10-1)
6) Ft. Worth Dr. (I35 to FM 1830 - 4 lanes - state 4-1)
7) Nottingham (3B^ to Mingo)
8) Bell Avenue (;80 to aineo)
9) Mingo (Bell to P,ddell)
1
.
•
a
~ I
1
P.3
2. Drainage
s
a) Update master plan --to 133 sq. miles
b) 86-871 Pecan Creek, SCUart/belene; Taylor Park
c) 87-881 Teasley Lane (reconstruction); Burning Tree Bridge;
Malon(Newton Rayzor)
d) 88-89: Update master plan (to 133 sq mi), Stuart/Sunnydale
e) 89-90: HolIyhill/Longridge; Loma Del Rey
f) 9U-91t James St,eet/Ft North Drive (F. W Drive construction)
3. Library/City Administration Facilities
a) Increase Library Expansion funds to $1,000,000
(includes $400,000 for parking fanility--which
will serve both Library and City Hall)
b) !2.6 million for Law Enforcement/Court Complex
4. Athletic Fields/Community Centers/Senior Citizens' Center
a) Athletic Fields
2 new soccer fields at Denia S renovation of
softball fields at Denia
5 new soccer fields 6 4 new lighted softball
fields at !North Lakes Park
Lighting for 4 baseball 6 2 softball fields
at Evers Park; also modify softball field to
baseball, renovate field #7 and develcp field 08--at Evers.
Light one soccer field at (North Lakes
b) Community Centers: 3 new community centers, with
highest priority to East (@1.2 mil)
C) Senior Citizens' Center Expansion) $750,000
5. Animal Control Center/Fire Station t; Equipment
a) Expand Animal Control Center ($I85,000)
(County has budgeted $40,000 for this; and
bunane Society likely to provide $60,000
for Adoption Center)
b) Fire Sub-Station d5 S new Pumper Truck
0 J. Additional Recommendations 0
A. That the Council conduct a public hearing prior to
calltrg the bond election
0 1
•
P.:
Y
z
b, That a cocunittee of S or 6, selected from the present
citizen's committee, be appointed to remain in existence
for the duration of the CIP, to meet at least once each
year to review and evaluate the progress of the scheduled
projects, and to report to the citizens.
Might be called CIP '86 Committee.
t'
C. That the Council consider the following list of
propositions for the bond election--
1. Streets 6 Traffic
2. Drainage
3. Animal Control Facilities
4. Fire Station 6 Equipment
5. Athletic Fields/CommunLty Centers/Senior Citizens' Center
6. Library Expansion
7. law Enforcement/Court Complex
Finally, the members of the committee have indicated their
willingness to assist in anyway they can with the carrying
of the message to this bond issue Lo the people.....,
•
a ~ • o
%
TT I—'
r
j -A,
•
I d
0
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 560-8307
Office 01 the City Manager
M E M U R A N D U M
TO: Hugh Ayer, CIF Committee Chairman
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
LATE: October 15, 1986
SUBJECT: LIST OF ATTENDEES AT OCTOBER 13 CIP COM14ITTEE
MEETING
According to the sign-in sheets, the following persons attended
the meeting on October 13:
h'illiam C. Crouch
Tom Harpool
Frank Davila
Ann Houston
Bob Crouch
Joe Holland
Roberta Donsbach
Ralph Morrison
Jack Miller
Hazel Frederick
Jo Luker
Helen Hailey
Mike Campbell
Elinor Hughes
Hugh Ayer !
Lisa Patterson
Lloyd Hindman
bill Angelo
O Bob Gorton
A. E. Hyatt
Allie 1. Miller
Geneva Berg
Harold Reed
Lucy Campbell `
Rick Salazar
~ Fred Patterson O O
Bill Claiborne
;t
1
I
`r' M . w
Sr
tP
1..
Memo to Ayer re 10/13 CIP Committee Meeting
October 15, 1986
Page Two
Further, the following committee members indicated that they
wculd be willing to work to help pass the bond issue; some also
noted special contributions which they could make as follows:
Fred Patterson (advertising)
A. E. Wyatt (law enforcement)
Jack Miller ✓
William C. Crouch
Rick Salazar
Lisa Patterson ✓
Tom Harpool
Lucy Campbell
Hazel Frederick r"
Roberta Donsbach
Jo Luker
Helen Halley (as helper)
Mike Campb±ll v' (Park, and Recreation Board)
Bob Gorton %.i
Frank Davila
kalph E. Morrison
Bill Claiborne ✓
Joe Holland (video tape presentation with film
divided to discuss each item on
ballot in depth)
Aga n, Hugh, thanks for the good work which you and your
committee nave done.
r ~
oya tarre
City Manager
ca
o r. .
24070
Q
•
r
I
I
I
I
r SLUE RIBBON CIP COMMITTEE
AGENDA
OCTOBER 13, 1986
I
I. Call to Order
II. Introduction - Hugh Ayer
III. Subcommittee Reports
IV. Questions and ;.iscussion
V. Consider a Recommendation to the City Council Regarding
CIP
VI. Discussion of Packaging of the Various Issues
VII. Consideration of Recommendation to the City council to
Allow the Committee to perform an Annual Review of the
Projects in the Capital Improvements Program
VIII. Discussion of Methods Which Can Be Used to Promote the
Issue and Circulation of a Sign-up Sheet for Individuals
Willing to Help With Campaign
IX. Adjournment
•
e • e
15916
•
'I
o II
r 1
II
AGENDA: CIP COMMITTEE MEETING, 10/13/86
1. Call to Order 7:00 p.m.
Ii. Recognition/Introduction of Council Members
Mr. Joe Alford, Mayor ProTem ( for a few words)
III. Introduction—
A. Thanks to--
1. Committee members for their superb work
2. Sub-Committee Chairs for their leadership
3. City Staff for stellar assistance
Note: i really didn't think you could meet the deadlines I set
on Sept. 4--but here we are within 4 days of that schedule.
B. Review of Work to Date
1. Sept. 4-25: A concentrated series of meetings, field
trips, consultations, fact gathering activities, etc.--
but you know all about that, and as Dizzy Dean put it,
"it ain't braggin if you done it." AND YOU DONE IT:
That was when the real work got done.
2. Sub-Committee Reports: Began arriving by Sept. 26, and
all were in by Oct. 3. A careful reading of those
reports indicated:
a. That for the moat part the recommendations prepared
by P 3 Z had received your endorsement.
b. That you also exercised your collective judgement
`t to recommend some changes, in general as follovs:
1) Deletion of some projects
•
2) Addition/substitution of other projects
3) Revision of some projects
4) Additional funds: 3 sub-committees increased their
requests; one was unchanged, and one (thankfully)
p recommended a reduction. • O
vR
• 0
I
i ~
0
2.
3. Two Problems Became Evident_
a. Requests exceed available funding bL 55=700K
Finance Director had said $21.150 mil. could be
comfortably finarced with the 59Q tax rate;
the P & Z CIP plan totalled 21.777; the total t
requested by the 5 sub-committees totalled 22.281--
510K above P & Z, 787K above Fin?nce Director.
b. Requests for YEAR ONE too high
In a memo included in your packet, the Finance
Director has reported that in order to fund the
CIP with the 591t tax rate, the annual expenditures
must begin at approximately 3.5 million in year
one, and gradually increase to 5.5 million in
year five.
The sub-committee reports requested a cumulative
total of 6.263 in year one.
4. After studying the reports, I met with Mr. Harrell
and others rembers of the staff on the afternoon of
Oct. 8. And with their aid and advice, I formulated
some recommendations to submit to the meeting of sub-
committee chairs that evening. A copy of those
recommendations is in your packet--
a. Delete two items, totallying 650K
1) Land acquisition for 3rd community center (250K)
2) Aerial fire truck (400K)
Ifevi're1 IWA-1: ,11,637
b. Make a number of adjustments in the scheduling of
projects--to make the debt servicing schedule work.
There is food logic for some of the changes; others
are sin,;, expedient.
The list of projects, by year, in your packet reflects
0 these proposed changes,
5. Meeting of Sub-Committee Chairs, Wed. evening, Oct. 8
A thorough discussion of all reports, numerous
questions about what was reconmended and why, etc. ,
The group then voted, unanimously, I believe, to
approve the changes I had recommended to them. • 0
l;
THUS, what you have before you f,, consideration this evening
! is the five sub-committee reports, as modified by the
changes which 1 have recommended and which were endorsed
by the chairs of the five sub-committees.
• 0
•
•
i
s
3.
i
IV. Reports of Sub-Committee Chairs (or Rep.)
A. Streets & Traffic: Jack Miller
B. Drainage: Bill Claiborne
C. Library/City Hall/Law Enforcement/Court: Joe Holland
D. Athletic Fields/Neighborhood & Senior Citizen Centers: r l;
i
E. Animal Control Center/Fire Station/Equipment: Bob Gorton
V. Discussion/Questions r l
V1, Act on Recommendations
NOTE: Any recommendations that are approved here this evening--
1. Will be submitted to P & Z on Wednesday (15th)
2. To the City Council next Tuesday--for public hearing j
3. And election to be called for early December
VII. Discussion of Packaging of the Various Issues
The meeting of sob-committee chairs agreed on the following
list for recommendation to you--
1. Streets & Traffic
2. Drainage
3. Animal Control
4. Fire Station/Equipment
5. Athletics/Community Centers/Senior Citizens Center
b. Library Expansion
7. +.aw Enforcement/Court Complex
•
Vill. Consideration of Recommendation to the City Council to Allow the
Committee to perform an Annual Review of the Projects in the CIP
IX. Discussion of Marketing Procedures/Techniques
(Circulate sign-up sheet for those willing to help) • 0
X. A )ournment
1
CA
0
REPORT TO P S Z I b- /f- fG y
1. Hest Citizens' Committee I've worked with....
50 highly motivated, public-spirited citizens
5 superb sub-committee chairs
II. Peceiv, 3 S studied CIP resulting from long 6 hard
work of this Board--and city, staff t
III. More than 3 weeks of intensive study, discussion, etc--
numerous meetings, field trips, fact gathering consultations
Agree with P & Z on the broad spectrum of needs
to maintain the quality of life of our community.
IV. The Report --some changes, some additions, some deletions.-,
The highlights--
1. Reduces the total request to 21.637--$510,000-
2. Deletes the re-routing of Bell Avenue--
Recommends insteadr Rebuild present Bell from Univ. to Mingo
Improve Mingo
Extend Nottingham to Mingo
3. Significant increase of funds for Library expansion
4. Endorses the concept of constructing a new Law
Enrorcement/Courts Complex
5. Adds a third community center
6. Lights for one soccer field
7. Increased number of traffic improvements --signals, trurn lanes
I, i ~l kf e~, ih Tiw)'Jq~//.feIV44^c,1.~ "f' y)1Jerb
We appreciate the opportunity to be involved in this mostl
important work of the city, and we thank lyou for this
opportunity to present the results of our deliberations to you.
s
Sub-committee chairs, as well as staff members are here
to respond to any questions you may have.
O ~ 0 0
i
u
0
yi
a h
y
CITY Of DENTON / 215 E, McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201
MEMORANDUM
F
fu: Hugh Ayer, Chairman
and Members of the Blue Ribbon CiP Committee
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
GATE: October 8, 1986
SUBJECT: C1P Funding information
Mr. Jonn McGrane, Finance Director, has reported that the following
funding level will accommodate a capital improvement program with a
targeted tax rate of $.59 per $100 valuation. These amounts include
the financing costs:
1986/87 - $ 3,500,000
1987/88 - $ 3,600,000
1988/89 - $ 3,800,000
1989/90 - $ 4,750,000
199U/91 - $ 5 5001000
12113-T1 DVD
fne Planning and ZonJng Commission recommended a program totaling
$21,777,000. 1'he CIF Subcommittees recommended a program totaling
$11,191,104.
1
L1 y~iiarre - r
sro
0 Attachment
10
1• r~ r rr n:.iClYi r G L a-. . _ e
4 x•N, l1 '.Y e
s
0
~)r~ahitd Eo)-u Mee •
WELCOME S THANKS for your willingness to serve. -
OUR CHARGE: To study and evaluate the Capital Improvement
Program recommended by the Planning and
Zoni:tg Board, to su;;jcst any deletions,
additions, or changes we deem desirable
or advisable--and then to recommend a
final package tgo the Council.
OUR CHALLENBL: Is to perform this task with complete
objectivity and with a total commitment
o! our collective judgement, so that
tie recommendations we formulate will
be in the best interests of the entire
city.
SOME POINTS TO NOTEt
14`~t.S I. Both the staff and the Planning and
t?~~ \tl~bt Zoning Board members have devoted
tt~a a great deal of time and expertise
1\~a1~ to preparing the package before us.
l
aV.4-It 2. The needs are extensive, numerous,
and complex; there is no way that
all of them can be met at once.
We must make careful choices.
Time is short. The work rust be
done quickly. We need a concentrated
effort.
GENERAL PROCEDURESt
i propose that the work be cone through a group
of sub-committees--one for each of the five
ur.oad program categories represented .n the
proposed program. Because of the complexity
of the proposed program and the size of the
committee, I believe this approach will help
to expedite the work. tl
sub-
0 Hopefully, by the end of September each/committee
can have a report ready for submission to the
full committee.
fk
If this approach meets with your approval, i,e
thinking--as this session continueq--about which
of the program areas you would prefer to w,rk
O with. Later this evening you will be ct : an 0
o{;portunity to list your ;,references.
k..
f
•
1
THIS EVENING'S PROCEDURESs
A. Review of Capital Improvement Program to date--
Mr. Bi1L Claiborne, Chairman, P 6 2 Bd.
B. Overview of proposed Capital Improvement
Program City Manager Lloyd Harrell and
members of the staff.
O. Distribution of sub-committee preference sheets
PROPOSED TIMETABLE FOR COM14ITTEE WORK
1. Sub-committees appointed and notified
by Monday, Sept. 8
2. First meeting of each sub-committee
by Sept. 12
3. Additional meetings, field trips, staff
work, etc., as scheduled by each sub-committee
Sept. 15-25
4, Sub-committee reports due
Sept. 30
5. Meeting of full committee to consider reports
Oct. 9
NOTES Copies of each sub-committee report
(condensed, if too lengthy) will be mailed
to all co^nmittee members prior to the Oct.
9 meeting.)
i
G~
1
AuENVA
SPECIAL CITIZENS ADVISORY CummITTEE
UN CAPIIAL IMPROVErit,irb
September 4, 1986
urganizational Meeting of the Special Citizens Advisory
Committee on Capital Improvements on Thursday, September 4,
1980, at 7:uu p.m. In the City Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:uu p.m.
1. welcome and introductions by Mayor Stephens
2. review of Cnarge and uutline of Evening's Activities
by Mr. Hugh Ayer
3. xeview of Capital Iutpcovement Program to Date by Mr.
Bill Claiborne
4. overview of Proposea Capital Improvement Program:
A. Intrcduction by Lloyd Harrill, City Manager
V. ureiuaae by Jerry Clark, City Engineer
C. dtreets and Traffic by Rick Svehla, Assistant
City nanader
L. AtaLetic rields by Steve Brinkman, Uirector of
Parks and Recreation
t. neignbornood and Senior Citizens Center by Steve
BrLnKman, Director of Parks and Recreation
r. Library by JoeLla Urr, Director of the Library
U. Animal Control by Bill Angelo, Assistant Director
of Public worxs
H. City Hall/Law Enforcement Center by Steve
Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation
O 1. Tire atation anu Equipment by Paul deed, Acting
Fire Chief
J. Selection of Subcommittee Desires
C E R T I F I C A T E
• 1 certify tnat the auove notice of meeting was posted on the O
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on
the day of 1986 at 00 OCK (a.m.)
(P m.1
CITY SECRETARY
23670
0
0
® I
r
I
a
f
i
I
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
A
t
STAFF PRUJECf YEAR MILLIONS CATEGURY
Drainage
Sveula/ Bridge on Woodrow Laue 1986-1987 .25U 1
Clark East McKinney Street Culvert 1986-1987 ,n25 I
Loan Del Key Uratuage 1986-1967 .825 1
Willow Springs Drair.3ge 1987-1988 .337 1
Stuart Road/Selene urainage 1987-1988 .310 1
Drainage Study 1988-1989 .45U 1
Stuart/S wrnydale Drainage L986-1989 .35U i
Taylor Park Drainage 1988.1989 .300 1
burning free uridge 1988-1989 1SU 1
Burning Tree Drainage 1988.1969 .064 1
Drainage Improvements In 11011y dill area 1989-1990 .3UO I
Audra Lane Drainage 1989-199U .990 1
3.461
• 0
Streets and Tralfic
Sventa/ reconstruct Urtole Street 1986-1987 117 2
C1arK Sidewalk on mercules 1986-Iq87 .015 2
Lillian Mtllcr parkway hidening 1986-1987 .450 2
e
0
•
Planning and Zoning Cenunissiua
Recomu:ended Capital lrnprovenleflL Plan
i
Page two
SfAPf Pit OJLX I' YLAK MILLIONS CAI LGOxY
Streets and .raffIc --continuatioal
i
5vehIa/ Signals Loop 288 and US 3bU 1987-1968
064 2
Clark Traffic Signals 1987-1988 .025
2
dell Avenue relocation (Pitst half) 1987.19b8 I.Uut
1
Improve Woodrow Lane 1967-1988 .525
2
Prl [181 ('!'easley Lane): Pour-Lace
Oversize Paving 1988-1989 1SU
Avenue L• lruprovemenLs (Lagle Drlve to 2
111-35 Service Road) 1988.1989 .040
Davis Street Paving 2
1988.1989 UIS 2
divided from 111-35L South to Ryan Road 1988-1989 LSO
Loop 288/LUCJl Yartitlpation: Pour-Lane 2
e dfvideC from US 360 south to near
]n-35L 1989-199(1 2.100
Nell Avenue RelUta.ion (Second half) 19b9-199U
l.SUO 2
US 36U/Local Participation: Six-Lane
diviaed from US 77 (Locust) to
e Loop 2bb 1984-199u 1.5Uo
US 3bU Might-of-Way Acquisition 1969.199(1 2
.250 2
Fort Worth Drive (U.1 377): Four-
Lane divided trom 111.35E to NM 183u 199(1-1991 1.005
traffic Study and lmpl^wientation 2
1990-1991 IOU 2
9.266
i
• j
i,
~ i
•
r
I,
I
' I
Planning and Tuning Uommission
Recommended Capital Improvement Plan
rage Ytiree
S I'AFF I!hUJtil
YEAR MILLION CATEGORY
I
Athletic fields
Brinkman Athletic Fields 1987.1948
2UU 3
Athletic fields 1988-1989 .200
Athletic Fields 3
1y49-199U .20U 3 I
Athletic Fields 1990-1991 .600
S } •I
1.200
Neighborhood and Senior Citizens Center
Brinkman Neighborhood Center, Southeast Denton 1986-1987
1.800 q
oeniur tenter Addition 1987-19d4 .750 Kecreation Center 4
• 1990-1991 1.800 q
4.35U I,
Libt1a
Urr Library IRPprovements 199U-1991
.25U S
ZSO
I
~ n
/
Y1ai~ning and ~ouu+g Cowmission
Recommended Capital Improvement Plal+
Page four
rSTAFF PR UJECT YEAR MILLIONS CATEGURY
Animal Control
Svenla/
Angelo Animal Control Center Expansiou 1987.1988 ISO
p
A SO
City Hall/Lax Entorcement Center
Brinkman Plans for City Hall Expansion 1987-1988 2UO 7
City Hail Expansion 1988-1989 1A UO 7
City Hall Expansiou 1989-199U 1.100 7
2.40U
1
Fire Station and EYutpment
Reed Fire Statlou 1948-1989 SUO 8
0 Fire tiehicles 1988-1989 too 8 0
.7UU
T 0 T A L 21.777
• 0 ( y.,
•
ra
•
•
Planning and Zoning Commission
Recommended Capital Improvement Plan
Page rive
3
Category l Drainage
Category 1 Streets and Traffic
Category 3 Athletic Fields
Category 4 Neighborhood and Senior Citizens Center
Category 5 Liurary
Category 6 Animal Control
Category 7 City call/Law Lnfurcement Center
Category 8 Fire Station and hquipwent
•
O p
[3bic
r
0
c~
0
. {I
c,
t
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 568.8307
Office of the City Manager
i
% L M U R A N U U M
7o: Planning and Zoning Commission
txUn Rick Svehla, Assistant testy Manager
DATt: August L6, 1986
SUdJECf: Modifications to the original CIP recommendations
Almost two months ago Planning and Zoning met and recommended a
hew CIP program to the CoutlcII. The program included a
continuation of the existing program and also recommended a
nuiber of additions to toe original schedule. You may also
recall, the staff mentioned that there were some pre-existing
bond covenants to deal with as well as some other scheduling
problems that might occur. Indeed several of those have
occurred, Consequently, we wiil be discussing these items with
the Citizens Committee for Capital Improvements. Uur purpose
in talKing with you was an interest to keep you informed and to
seek any further comment iron the Commission,
Let me start with the changes that would reduce the cost of the
program. In the first year of the program, you have the East
Mckinney Street culvert which is estimated to cost iis,uuu.
This culvert has been eliminated because the developers of the
~,ummerwind development had to make oft-site drainage
improvements that will eliminate this culvert. In the next
year, 1987-1968, we have also eliminated the need for one major
• project. That is the Stuart-Seline drainage ysten. The cost
of tats project 15 f11U,000 and the developer has joined with
the City in ouilding this system. fie will share a part of this
cost and the City will share the rest of this cost. Ne were
able to fund our shares from existing surplus CIP money and the
money that was slated for the Stuart Street renovation under
the $LU million street bond program. The next savings could be
realized in 1988-1969. Tnat is for street oversize paving. In ~ • •
this years budget, the Council is considering modification of
the oversize regulations that are contained in the Subdivision
kules and Regulations. It would eliminate almost all cost of
oversizing and taus we are suggesting that we re-allocate the
• 0
o
v
ClP Moditications memo
August 26, 198b
Page 2
515u,000 that was aliocated for this project. Finally in ,r
198v-iv90, we originally proposed $1.5 million for U.S. 380.
'tile Planning and Zoning Commission may remember that originally
you had rescheduled $900,U00 of this money to do projects this
year. because of the way the bonds were voted on originally, a
this original $900,000 cannot be used for other projects. Un
advice of our bond attorneys, they have suggested that we not
spend this money but rather re-allocate some of the money
recommended by the Commission. Therefore, instead of
allocating $1.S million for U.S. 380, we would recommend
allocating $bu0,0uu for U. S. 38U. The combined result of all
of these reductions would mean a savings of $1,395,000.0U.
Because of some of the rulings and changes in our needs, staff
has also been looking at other changes that would add
additional cost to the bond issue. These additions are as
follows. As mentioned earlier, bond covenants do not allow us
to spend the $9UU,tiOU for 0.5.380 that you re-allocated last
year. Because of that we have had to put a hold on the
following projects that were originally scheduled: Pecan Creek
improvements near the Phoenix Apartments for $110,000; the
tvers School sidewalk for $4u,uuu; the turn lanes at several
locations within the City for $230,000; signals at Old North
Road, mulberry and Carroll, Windsor and Sherman for $145,000;
and upgrading the signal system on Carroll Blvd. plus adding r
turn lanes at Carroll and Uaiversity for $17U,u00. The total
cost of these Items is $695,000. We also mentioned that Stuart
and Seline would not have to be built with the CIF money.
Basically that is true. However, we have been advised by the
higliway Department that we will have to change some of our
original design where this system crosses Loop 288. We are
projecting the cost of $5U,000 to make these adjustments. IOU
also had Davis Street in your original recommendations. The
cost of that was for $15,000. This was for approximately bUU
feet of paving. We have re-analyzed that cost and found it to
be low. We are projecting the need of an additional $3S,u0U to
complete Davis Street.
• Since we last visited with you we have also been in discussions
with the County on animal control problems. The County has
agreed to pay us $4U,uuu to help us expand the Animal Control
Center. You may recall that the original C1P recommendation
was for $1SU,UUU. To incorporate the County Into our program,
the space required would be off-set by the $40 000. However,
when we do that we will also be required to add an Isolation
0 area for animals. We would be required to do this in • 0
approximately 3.4 years or whenever our population reached
75,uuo. f would suggest adding an additional $35,000 to our
original $15U,000 to be used with the County's $40,UO0 in
providing us a facility that will meet our projected needs to
the year 2000.
• - 0
s
r~
a
.r
f,
C1P Modifications Memo
August 26, 1986
Page S
we navy also talked to the people at the Library and we have
found that $2513,000 will not go very far toward providing any
kind of sufficient space to be used as a branch facility. In
light of this and after discussions that Joelia Orr has held
with several architects, we are suggesting that this portion of '
your recommendation be expanded by $3SOt000 to a total of
$6uo,Uuo for a brancn facility.
We hr.ie been advised by the Highway Department that the section
of Teasley Lane from 1-35 to Dallas Drive will have to be built
according to all their specifications and bid according to all
their procedures. Uriginaily this part of Teasley was
scheduled to be built with the southern part of Teasley. The
original funding for all of was projected to core from the $10
million street bond issue that was passed a couple of years
ago. You may also recall that you funded a small portion of
tnis, approximately $L5U,0000 to oft-set additional changes In
cost estimates that the State gave us. Mith the new
requirements that the State is making on us, our original
estimates have gone from $170,000 to approximately $380,000.
We are suggesting that we increase the Teasley Lane funding
from $25u,000 to $45U,000 to off-set this change in plans.
Finally, I would like to discuss some other ideas that the
staff has had that we are recommending. They are twofold. The
first of these is, after receiving some Input from the
neighburhoods as well as looking at the needs of the community,
we have gone back to the drawing board and feel that smaller
recreation centers could be built for approximately $L.2
million. We Will be exploring the Idea of changing from a two
center strategy to a three center strategy to help off-set the
needs throughout the community as well as following up on input
from the neighborhoods.
6econdly, we have been looking at alternatives to the $2,4
million recommendation for the expansion of City Hall. As we
mentioned to you, staff nas been conducting a space needs stu.ly
for a year. After reviewing all of the results of that survey,
• we find that the public safety sector of our operations
continue to grow at a very fast rate. This has caused us to
look again at our recommendation and we are now looking at an
alternative that would build a Police and ;Municipal Court
services building rather than an addition to the City Hall. We
would be talking approximately that same amounts of money to
proviae space for the Courts and the Police Department and
O would be able to then convert the old Police building into 0
offices to be used by City Ilrll personnel. There is some
$30,UOu left over from the savings sfJe of the ledger from your
original programs and we would suggest that this $30,OUO be
0 0
•
1
1I
{
CIV Modifications Memo
August 26, 19do
Page 4
allocated to either the City }Fall expansion or to the MunicipaL
Court and Police Building depending on which option the Council
decides upon.
We will also be discussing and continue to discuss scheduling
with the Committee and the Council based on projections that we
continue to get, particularly frao the Highway Department.
with the concern for state funding and the discussion of
possible cuts of highway funding there may be some projects
that we would suggest moving forward or back depending on when
the funding can be realized.
We look forward to discussing any and all of these projects
with you Wednesday evening and we will be happy to try and
answer any uestions tnat you might have concerning any of them.
is Yehla
Assistant City manager
ji
3uS3M
•
i•
e
1 c•
0
I
1
ADDI'ilUNS ANL OELET1UNS
AUDITIONS i
Pecan Creek $110,000
Evers Sidewalk $40,000
Turn Lanes $230,000
Tnree Signals $145,uuu
Upgrade of Carroll $170,00u
Stuart-Seline $SO,OVO
Uavis Street $3S,000
Animal Control $35,UUu
Library $350,000
Teasley Lane $20U,u00
City Hall Addition $3U,(Ou
JuTAL $1,395,000
DELETIUNS
E. McKinney Bridge $251000
Seline-atuart Drainage 132U,uUO
Oversizing LSO)OOu
U.S. 3bu 900000
TUTAL $1,395,000
•
i
• 0
I
i
•
4?
O i
t
CIP COMMITTEE
STREETS AND TRAFFI:'7'UB-COMMITTEE
Staff Liaison: Rick S;ehla
Bill Crouch Hugh Ayer, CIP Chairperson
408 Magnolia 425 Mimosa
Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 362-2946 Home Fhone: 387-1136
Work Phone: 382-5478 Work Phone:
Frank Davila
2408 Fowler
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-7946
Work Phone: 898-2040
Robbie Gober
734 Wilson
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 3d3-1354
Work Phone:
Tom Harpool
Harpool's Seed, Inc.
420 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-8622
Work Phone: 387-0541
Lloyd Hindman
2313 Vanderbilt Court
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 566-2622
Work Phone:
Allie Miller
RFD 1 Denton, Texas 16201
Home Phone: 362-5067
• Work Phone: 387-9501
Jack Miller, Sub-Committee Chairperson t...
Victor Equipment Co,
P.O. Box 1007
Denton, Texas 76202
Home Phone: 387-2461
o Wor% Phone: 566-2000 • •
15328
0 0
e
e
STREETS AND TRAFFIC SUE-COMMITTEE
Staff Liaison: Rick Svehla
Page 2
Ralph Morrison
716 Northridge
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-4974
Work Phone:
Fred Patterson
2412 Rayewood
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-8594
Work Phone: 387-3811
Larry Reynolds
Southmont Baptist Church
2801 Pennsylvania
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 566-2532
Work Phone: 566-3313
Joe Short
KDNT Radio
1440 Wheeler Drive
Denton, Texas 76205
Home Phone: 387-8619
Work Phone: 382-2552
e
e ~ ~ e
1532a
s
i
•
O
•
CIP COMMITTEE
LIBRARY AND CITY HALL
Staff Liaison : BetOty M Kean,U J el la Orr, Hugh Lynch
Derrell Bulls Hugh Ayer, CIP Chairperson
1428 E. Windsor 425 Mtmosa
Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 383-1754 Home Phone: 387-1136
Work Phone: 898-2111 Work Phone:
John Enlow
205 Industrial
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-6897
Work Phone: 566-2901
Hazel Frederick
309 Panhandle
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-8638
Work Phone:
Joe Holland, Sub-Committee Chairperson
Denton Bicycle Center
1700 North Elm
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 362-4645
Work Phone: 387-9314
Elinor Hughes
1821 Linden
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-2867
Work Phone: 565-3487
Dave Krause
1801 Southridge
• Denton, Texas 76205
Home Phone: 382-7334
Work Phone: 382-5481
Clovis Morrisson, Jr,
2310 Santa Monica
® Denton, Texas 76205 • 0
Home Phone: 387-5017
Work Phone: 565-2900
1532s
• 0 .
1
i i
i
e i
•
r i
LIBRARY AND CITY HALL LAW ENFORCEMENT SUB-COMMITTEE
Staff Liaison: Betty McKean, JOella Orr, Hugh Lynch
Page 2
Sue Smith
1819 Crescent
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-1016
Work Phone:
Bennie Snider
North Texas Savings and Loan
321 W. Oak
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-4841
Work Phone: 382-9676
A. E. Wyatc
2731 Robinwood
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-5919
Work Phone: 566-2220
•
j
1S32s
• r r~ ar rd.R1Y S' v 'r ie.- , , ~ S .4 ` , a S ' ,
•
•
CIP COMMITTEE
DRAINAGE SUB-COMMITTEE
Staff Liaison: Jerry Clark
Bill Brady Hugh Ayer, CIP Chairperson
P.O. Box 1307 425 Mimosa
Denton, Texas 76202 Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 362-6858 Home Phone: 387-1136
Work Phone: 387-3505 Work Phone:
Lucy Campbell
636 Wolftrap
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 383-4084
Work Phone: 565-7384
Bill Claiborne, Sub-Committee Chairperson
2103 Westwood
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-7227
Work Phone: 565-7179
Bob Crouch
601 N. Locust
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-4107
work Phone: 382-6707
William P. Phillips
2200 Southridge
Denton, Texas 76205
Home Phone: 382-3000
Work Phone: 566-7010
Harold Reed, Jr,
1614 Scripture
Denton, Texas 76201
• Home Phone: 387-5020
Work Phoney 387-5655
Richard Salazar
Weathertrol Supply Company
600 I-35 East
Denton, Texas 76201
• Home Phoney 383-3371 • •
Work Phone: 382-9622
1532s
f
DRAINAGE SUB-COMMITTEE
Staff Liaison: Jerry Clark
Page 2
Don smith
2107 Emerson
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-5126
Work Phone: 565-2011
Ed Wolski
2205 Pembrooke Place
Denton, Texas 76205
Home Phone: 566-3370
Work Phone: 566-0215
4
1532e
J
,a
• ` 11 4 r 5 f
y'
•
•
i~
ATHLETIC FCIP COMMITTEE
SENIOR CITIZENSDCENTERSHpgHCOD AND
Staff Liaison: Steve SBrinkmITTEE
Karen Abernathy
1264 RIO Grande Blvd.
Denton, Texas 76205 H4ugh Ayer, CIP Chair
Home Phone: 387-4 25 Mimosa Person
Work Phone: 876 Denton, Texas 7: Home Phone: 6201
Mike Work P 387-1136
Campbell hone:
924 Imperial
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-3276
Work Phone: 565-3402
George Edwards
519 ParkIane
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-5604
Work Phone: 383-331,
Helen Halley
814 Kings Row
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone; 387-785I
Work phone: 382-4621
John Harris
Tetra Pak
3330 Airport Road
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-0004
Work Phone: 565-8800
Jo Luker
1213 Piping Road Lane
Oentonr Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-8559
Work phone:
Darla McDade
2502 Sherwood
Denton, Texas 76201
Nome Phone: 383-3078
Work Phone;
• • 0
1532s
• 0
1
•
Q
CI2 COMMITTEE
ATHLETIC FIELDS, NEIGHBORHOOD AND
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTERS SUB-COMMITTEE
Staff Liaison: Steve Brinkman
Kiren Abernathy Hugh Ayer, CIP Chairperson
1204 Rio Grande Blvd. 425 Mimosa
Denton, Texas 76205 Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-4876 Home Phone: 387-1136
Work Phone: 896-2111 Work Phone:
Mike Campbell
924 Imperial
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-3274
Work Phone: 565-3402
George Edwards
519 Parklane
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-5604
work Phone: 383-3312
Helen Hailey
814 Kings Row
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-7851
Work Phone: 382-4621
John Harris
Tetra Pak
3330 Airport Road
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-0004
Work Phone: 565-8800
Jo Luker
1213 Piping Road Lane
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-8559
Work Phones
Darla McDade
2502 Sherwood
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 383-3078
• Work Phones • 0
1532a
ATHLETIC FIELDS, NEIGHBORHOOD AND
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTERS SUB-COMMITTEE
Staff Liais,;n: Steve Brinkman
Page 2
Bettye Myers
2913 Croydon
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-2043
Work Phone: 898-2575
Kathy Orr, Sub-Committee Chairperson
2205 Woodbrook
Denton, Texas 76205
Home Phone: 566-0098
Work Phone:
Lisa Patterson
Golden Triangle Mall
Denton, Texas 76205
Home Phone: 382-5660
Work Phone: 566-6023
Donald Wright
U.S. Bank
P.O. Box 2226
Denton, Texas 76202
Home Phone: 387-0659
Work Phone: 382-6701
•
1532s
~ , . ~ .r~~r ~OiYfY•". , Y - _.--O ~ f`, i ,1, r ~r ~ Itr,iW ' ~ J~ i~~~l
'b~r 6~ SA
L
•
•
CIP COMMITTEE
ANIRE STATION
ANDMEQUIPMENTLSUB-COMMITTEE
Staff Liaison; Bill Angelo, Paul Reed
i Geneva Berg
Locust Street Grill H
ugh Ayer, CIP Chairperson
425
104 N. Locust Street Den en min*
Denton, Texas 76202 home Phone: Texas 7-113
Home Phone; 382-5174 me Phone: 387-1136
Work Phone: 566-3617 Wotk Phone;
Homer Bly
First State Bank of Denton
101 S. Locust
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 382-3070
Work Phone: 382-5421
Jake Craven
801 Liveoak
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-1595
Work Phone: 382-5016
Roberta Donsbach
2701 W. Oak
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-1592
Work Phone: 387-4341
Bob Gorton, Sub-Committee Chairperson
Physical Therapy Department f 11 h"+k f
Flow Hospital LD 4wkti
1310 Scripture
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 387-3691
Work Phones 383-6571
A Ann Houston
Re-Max 216 W. Mulberry
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone: 566-1174
Work Phones 565-0855
• r • e
1532s
z
i
O
O
i
ANIMAL CONTROL/FIRE STATION AND EQUIPMENT SUB-COMMITTEE
Staff Liaison: Bill Angelo, Paul Read
Page 2
John Hughes
Morrison's
319 E. Prairie
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone:
Work Phone: 387-6111
Chuck Smith
Peterbilt i
3200 Airport Road
Denton, Texas 76201
Home Phone:
Work Phone: 566-7100
Donna Trammell I
2209 Hollyhill Lane
Denton, Texas 76205
Home Phone: 367-0418
Work Phone: ,
I
i
0
1532s
.e
.
fir..
i
1
C6"Nlft I~ep~yts
STREETS AND TRAFFIC
I
• e o
w .a ra.we~ . i
ti Y r l ~ } R~
0
0
dEPOnT FKOS THE STREET UIP SUBCOMMITTEE
The street subcommittee finished up its meetings on October 2,
1986. ';he main issues that confronted the committee were
follovat
as
1. Should some substitutions be made because of
the $900,UDU worth of aurplus funding for U,S.
380 and because of the deletion of the
overslsing?
Z• Should the Bell Avenue rerouting be included to
this bond proposal?
3. Should all of the projects be Included lit one
proposition on the ballot?
Substitutions were made for the excess funding that was
avallable.becouse of the deletion of the oversislag and because
of the overfunding of U.S. 380. The overatsing was deleted
because the council Indicated In the budget that they wanted to
Increase the amount of developer participation in streets that
were larger them residential. The Council has Instructed that
staff to rewrite the overslsing participation regulations.
This regulation will require a maximum of 45' of paving from a
developer versus the existing 34' of paving from a developer.
Theme new regulations will virtually eliminate the need for
oversislag funds on any facilities built by developers. It
would require the developer to build up to four lane facilities
without any participation from the City. Thus the $150,000
that was recommended by planning and Zoning for the fiscal year
19b8-1989 was deleted.
I'he subcommittee was also able to take advantage of excess
funding for the U.S, 380 Joint project between the State and
the City of Denton. In the last bond issue, in 19810 cisit-as
of Denton voted a total of $900,000 for improvements and
0 right-of-way acquisition to U.S. 380. In 1981, the State
Highway Department indicated that U.S. 380 would be begun in
drew that proect. As the design of U.S. 380 had beta delayed and that they would not
do U.S. 380 before 1986 or 1987, Subsequently, ty have et
It back to 1989 and 1990. Whom staff was Informedhof this,swe
conveyed this information to the planning and Zoning Commission • 0
and the City Council. Rather than let that money sit idly In
our Invested funds, it was n'; :,g±atsd that planning and Zoning
move some other Projects up from later years in the CIP that
ware not funded. Planning mail Zoning did this In 1984 and
suggested that a number of projects which would improve traffic
0 0
O
0
•
I
Street Subcommittee Aeport
~I
October 6, 1986
Page 2
1
movements throughout the City be the main focus of
39UU,000. They that
further agreed that in the next bond imaue, F
they would again reallocate money for U.S. 380. The Council
reviewed that recommendation add approved it. This year while
staff was having discussions with the boad council add
financial advisors about using excess CIP funds for additional
projects, the discussion moved to U.S. 380 and that plan to
move funds. During the discussion, the financial advisors
asked us how the propositioa had been phrased on the election
proposal. We found that this particular $900,000 had been
specifically called out for U.S. 38U. After further
consultation with them, they advised us that since the wording
to that particular proposal explicitly met out 1900,000 for
U.S. 3dO it could legally be spent only for U.S. 38U, Staff
Immediately informed the Council. We met aside S900,U00 for
U.S. 38U and it is sitting In out separate CIP interest bearing
accounts.
All of theme discussions occurred after Planning and Zoning had
made the new recommendation to the Council that included total
fuading for the U.S. 380 project as indicated by the Highway
Department. (As you will note, the Highway Department's
estimate has changed from a construction cost of 1700,000 to a
construction cost of $1.5 million) Since planning and Zoning
had recommended full funding and since the financial advisors
and boad attorneys had indicated that the original 4900,000
could not be spent, we to essence either had existing or
recommended funding for a total of $2.4 million for U.S. 380,
Since the fadication from the Highway Department was that the
total construction cost would be 51.5 million, we then have the
excess of =900,000. It is this money that was in the
recommendation thet the subcommittee chose to substitute for
and those substitutions are included in the first year of the
subcommittee recommendation.
The second major point that the subcommittee considered was
} whether the rerouting of bell Avenue should be Included In this
bond issue. The subcommittee received numerous calls, letters
and comments from a number of people about the project. The
♦ overwhelming majority of these contacts were negative. Most of
the people thought that this bell Avenue project should not be
built and further more that the existing bell should not be
closed. The subcommittee also considered the past Bell
projects and &ligaments that had negative effects on prior bond
Issues. Taking these factors into conaiderati,d, the
subcommittee felt that this Issue sbould be deleted from this
bond election. k' • •
•
Q
•
Street Subcommittee Report
Uctober 6, 1Y86
Page 3
The last major issue that the subcommittee reviewed was whether
all of the rest of theme recommendations should be considered
as one proposal ate the bond issue or as separate or packaged
proposals, The subcommittee decided that all of these street
improvements should be considered as one total package.
The following is a list by year of the recommendations of
street and traffic Subcommittee. the
i
lytl6-lyy7
Cost in Millions <
1. Sidewalk on Hercules
(Stuart to Buckingham) 3.015
This was a small project which was Included in the original
Planning and Zoning recommendations. It was in response to
neighborhood requests to help school :h1ldres is the Gtnaings
area get to school on sidewalks rather than in the street.
2. Lillian Miller Parkway widening
This is the second pair of lanes for Lillian Miller. 4it would
allow u■ to improve the facility to a four lane divided
structure with left turns at major street intersections. The
first two lanes and all of the drainage improvesents were built
under am assessment program to the developers in this area,
These last two lanes would be at the City's total espeose.
3. Evers Park sidewalk
(Windsor to Evers School) $.040
T
his is a substitute project for the overfunding of U.S. 3aU.
rhe
StreestidetwoalEkverrusnsPaalong t and north
on t tho side of
north side s of from
EversLoPark
from Locust to the school. This is an attempt again to provide
some safe walking areas for students that are attending Evers
School.
4. Turn lanes
(Dallas Dr. and Teasley, Carroll and Eagle, ='230
*35 and Lillian Miller)
This project would build turn lanes to help improve traffic
• m
and
ovements at the three intersections mentioned. At Dallas Drive eas Drive, At Carroll and Eagle, would b would be turn
free lanes on turn Dallas for
south Carroll onto westbound Eagle. At 135 and Lllliam Miller,
there would be three free right, turn lanes for northeast bound
Lillian Allier turo.tog onto the southbound frontage road, for
southwest bound Loop 288 turning tight onto the Dallas Drive or
Business 17 frontage road or northbound 335 frontage road, and •
for the northbound frontage road turning northeast on to Loop
2bb. Thia project is also a substitute project for the
overfunding on U.S, 380.
0 0
•
c>
•
I
® j
I
I
I
I
Street Subcommittee Report
October 6, l9db
Yege 4
a. I
i
New signal Installations
y and Carroll, Old North Road and l•145
U.S. 3801 Windsor and Sherman)
Tnese Installations would be at the intersections mentioned.
They would allow us to install new poles and state-of-the-art
controllers and signal equipment. This is also a substitute i
project.
I
6, signal eSyof Car:oll and stem$ (Controllarvreplaceaenta ate
=.170
Carroll sad Hickory, Carroll and Parkway,
Carroll sad Congress, University and Alice,
Carroll and University, Bell and University,
Locust and University, Elm and Uaiversity,
Carroll and Oak)
As noted, this would replace all of the controllers at the
above mentioned intersections.
them with state-of-the-art controllIt ulllow us to rlce
ersothatawould be ableetoabe
fiscal 1987-1980. Thismistalaohatsubstitutesuggested to be funded is
project.
7. Signal at Loop 288 and U.S. 380
This project has been moved up. It was part of ~•the4
staf
that was requested by Planning and Zoning. This
would allow us to build a diamond interchange to facilitate the
new construction at the overpass at Loop 288 and U.S. 380.
i
8. Traffic Study
This was a staff recommendation for the Planning and Zoning
request. The study will allow us to do
an 811 the new installations on CarrollandppUniversity. it
will suggest timing schedules for different peri*
day. It will make suggestions on how the wholeosy during the
uld
run and how it should be tied to the central computer, shThis
was a substitute project from the excess fundin
380 and it was also part of the recommendation thatvstaffnmade
to Plaaaing and Zoning at their request.
i
1981g88
Cost is Millio~•
• 1. Improve Woodrow Lane
(MCKiaeey to Spencer Road) 1•323
This project would build a four lane divided facility from
AeXtaney Street to Spencer Road and tie It to the existing
Spencer-Colorado connectioa that leads to the melt. It would
be built in conjunction with the Woodrow Lana bridge which is
recommended to be built in 1986.1967 by the drainage
• subcommittee. It was as origimal recommendation from the • 0
Planming and Zoning Commission.
i
i
+i
i
• O a
•
Street Subcommittee Report
October 6, 1986
Yage 5 p
2. Teasley Lane
(Dallas Drive to 135) S.200
Tnis reco funding vas a recommendation
m ended in respo from staff. It was
areddciotmional proposalsase to "A"109 and Zoning,s re ues[
. Tealsey was originally funded In
the $for
10
project to match bond issue. In that issue we estimated or stretched
our ch Highway funding and to Include thl
proposal, s
section of of Teasley which wan not Included in the origia•1 state f 5iace It Is a Farm' to-,61arket , $Late ham 1
final aut4orlty over design road the
estimated the cost of and review, we originally
required to build it thin to be =110,000. Because we will be
remove some coacrete structures that haves beealbuiltiover the
years and also acquire additional right-of-way at, the
Intersections, our new estimate IN some :370,000. Therefore
r
we are equirement~4uesticg as additional X100,000 to reet these
3. Traffic Signals
(Replacement of one controller) 1.023
This was an original recommendation ng, It
would allow us to replace our by Planning and Zoni
controller In the system when we go mtost aechamics to this year.
lly deficiat
4. Traffic Study phase 11
(computer and tie-lq to system on Carroll 1.075
and University)
This will be the actual computer and the tle•in to the
University and Carroll system. This wan a staff response to
the Planning sad Zoning request for additional projects. This
tie-in computer will allow us to analyze traffic
Instantaneously throughout the systems on University ■nd
Carroll. It will allow us to make each of these systems
respond to pre-planned timing mequeaces or It will allow us to
change signal operations individually as the mead arises. It
will also give us a daily history of the operation of each
signal and help us to provide appropriate information to the
police sad legal departments on day claims lodged against the
City for liability dealing with the signals.
• S. Traffic and drainage Improvements to
111080 Road =,ZSO
This pro,ect IN a substitute for the Ball Avenue deletion. It
will allow us to make soma basic lmprovsmeate to Mingo Road
between Ituddell and Bell Avenue.
make drainage replacements at MlaBo~aadwithe ll spend channel this money to
at
the TkU golf course. Also drainage iaprovameats to • O
® interasctioa of Ruddell and Minio• It will also allow ustto
make road widoalags to accommodate left turn laces at Ruddell
and possibly at the Service Center and Frame Strait
Intersections. Any money that is left will also allow us to
look at sigaaliaia8 the Intersection of Ruddell and Mia80.
• O
•
c,
•
' r
Street Subcommittee Report
October 6, 1966
Page b
6. Rebuilding of bell Avenue $.45J
Cfrom Mingo to U.S. 3841)
This Is also a substitute project for the deletion of the Bell
Avenue improvements. This would allow us to rebuild the y
existing Bell Avenue from University to Mingo Road. It will
also us to replace some curbs aloug this entire length where
they need to be rebuilt. we will also look at minor
Improvements to the intersection of Bell and Hfago and possibly
U.S. 38U at bell Avenue.
19b8-1989 Cost in Millions
1. Avenue E improvements $.040
(Eagle Ur. to 135)
This would project a two lane facility from the froatage road ,
vast of Avenue D and 135 to the intersection of Eagle and
Avenue E. It would provide easier access to North Texas State
from say place on the west side of the campus directly from
135. This was an original recommendation of Planning and
Zoatas.
2. Davis .Street paving $.050
This Is for a two block area of Davis Street. This project
would run from Ruddell to Janata Street. It Is a residential
street and an original recommendation from Planning and
Zoning. It will pruvide a regular residential section and curb
and gutter.
.
3. PM11bl • Teasley Lane $.250
(from 235 to Ryan load)
This additional funding is needed because of cost increases as
indicated by the Highway Department, It will be to make
Teasley Lane four lanes from 135 to Ryan kosd. This Is the
original Highway project and the funding ratio is approximately
4 to 1, that being the State's 4 to the City's 1 dollar,
1989.1990 Cost In Millions
1. Loop 28b $2,20
• (from U.S. 380 to Colorado Blvd.)
This would make a four laae structure on Loop 288 from U.Sa 380
to Colorado Blvd. It would provide for intersection
Improvements at major Intersection& such as dcKfaaay. This
will be a state participation project. The cost benefit ratio
is approximately 7 to 1.
• 2, U.S. 380 • University $.600 r •
(from Locust to Loop 288)
This would provide a six lane facility from Locust Street to
Loop 288 with Intersection improvements at major
intersections. This is the project that we olimloated $900,000
from since it was double funded after we received the
information from the financial advisors and the bond attorasys,
i
e
ca
0
Street 5ubcaumtttee Report
October 6, lybp
Page 7
3. U.S. 38U right-of-way acquisition.
This will fund the right-of-way acquisition for ;theU above . 2 5 project. It will provide us with money to match the state for
any eight-of-way acquisition. The fundin
state money for every $1 of ours. g ratio will be 910 of
4. Extension of Nottingham
(from U.5. 38U to ,dingo Road) 9.5aD
380 o Mingo It
Thistproject Road.pr vid'eill or four lane improvement from U,c
At Nottingham and Umiveralt»Provide intersection improvements
$5U,000 worth of funding for rig
o sad Nottingham,
and at ht-ofewa intI@ Inled in this
project and also- $50,000 for signal improve entscatd Nottingham
and U.S. 380. The committee further made a recommendation that
only $50,000 be spent on right -of -way and that if further
eight-of-way is needed then assessments should be made to
property owners on both sides to cover the additional costa.
This project is also a substitution for the Bell Avenue
deletion.
1990:199
Coat illong
1• Reconstruction of Oriole Street
This project has been rescheduled. 4.117
recommendation from Planning and Zonin It was an original
because the Loma del Rey drainage project Iwill be adoneulin
connection with the Loop 288 construction and part of the main
trunk line for system runs on Oriole Street. It will provide a
residential street and new curb and gutter where needed.
2. Fort Worth Drive
(from 135 to Fri 1830) 41.065
This Is another state project. It will. provide for a four lane
facility with intersection Improvements at major cromefnge. It
is a state matched project. The approximate match is 4 to 1 in
favor of the City.
14 conclusion, the total cost of these projects is 47.736
million. The committee originally had some mina and a quarter
million dollars worth of funding available to it. They voted
turn aPProximately 41.3 million back to the chairman and the
e rest of the group to help fund other subcommittee overruns or
other projects the whole committee felt were needed. They did,
however, make one other ouggestiom that should be reviewed by
the full committee. They suggested that as a number one
priority for additional funding if funds are available, Ruddell
Street. This would provide $300,000 for improvements to allow for a small amount of widening on Ruddell. The widening would r
~ Provide for a s e 0
University Drive tolaMingod load • Ituswouldt be u contingentfron
acquiring the right-of-way from TWU.
i
•
•
f
Street Subcommittee Report
October 8, 1986
Page a
This concludes the final report of
Subcommittee the Street and Traffic
. We would be baPPY to discuss
may questions have at t the committee 8 c adrthe and further
October 13 meetings. committee as a whole
Jac ITT-e
Bill roach
31104
1!
•
• ~ 5 S r r - ti 4`
k
O
I
VRAINACE
l
I
I
1
0 j
IVA
r
•
p
0
Y U~.
r
.
Cl rY of ONNTON DEN70N, rms 70901
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October b, 1986
f0: Blue Ribbon Committee
FROM: Bill Clalrborne, Chairman of Drainage Committee
SuBJECr: Final Project Selection and Timing - Drainage
The memo shoving the projects, their costs, and date of
construction is enclosed. Each project will be briefly
described below.
1986-87:
A. Pecan Creek - 1'his project involves about 1400' of
concrete fTning for the channel through the Phoenix
Apartments. Maintenance and flooding problems
precipitated the request.
0. Woodrow Bridge - This bridge is required to replace
an existing low water crossing that experiences
flooding of five to ten feet creating a dangerous
situation. This is more serious since the route to
the mall has been connected.
• C. Stuart/Selene - This will fund the large pipe
foreSthe to
project tnowStbeinglgcompleteydofwithp t289
he 1
Stuart/Perching paving improvements.
D. Uralnage Regulation Studv - This will allow the
consultant to update our drainage design manual and
0 subdivision regulations to make them consistent with • 0
other cities In the area.
E. Ta for Perk Drains e - This project includes 5
separate co ect on systems to get the water from the
residential areas now being flooded to channels that
will carry it away.
• 0
• i
i
o
I
r -
page 2 of 3 pages
tr_
F. Burnin free Drainage -This will fund four collection
Sys ens
on -Emerson, I on Burning Tree, 1 on Old
Lee Court) that should alleviate flooding caused by
streets exceeding their capacities and running into
homes that are lower than the street.
G. Audra Lane Drainage - Most of the system was built in
AudraBLane Sand pOlpd not abl to be the required locations
withcrelation to deep,ilflat sborrow ditchespthae area
water,
1987-88:
A. Willow Springy - Culverts under Dallas Drive will be
properly ze as will the culverts at Duncan Street
and Willow Springs. The existing channel will be
shaped to the proper section and a partial concrete
bottom installed from Dallas Drive to the railroad
culverts south of Kerley Street.
B. Teasle Lane - This will fund the drainage associated
w t r e easley Lane reconstruction between Dallas
Drive and 13SE. Funds will be placed with the street
Issue.
C. Malone . This ipe system will address the current
How ,g on Cp0rdell and Malone just south of
University. The water will be collected In Inlets
and piped to the channel east of the Newton Razor
School.
D. By rninn Tree Brid e - The current bridge was
constructe a out t years ago. This sizing Is
Inadequate which restricts the water in Cooper
Creek. Cooper Creek has experienced a great deal of
development which has used up most of Its capacity.
flits means the backwater created by the bridge causes
more problems than it should on a properly sized
channel. The bridge does get under water and catch a
great deal of debris.
1988-89:
A. Update Alaster Drainage Plan - These funds will expand
the master plan to 133 square miles so that the City
The recentl development boom hadr tractsstoutside sour r O e
current plan almost weekly. Both the City and
developers will be able to properly analyze drainage
at a much more reasonable cost. The committee has
recommended that the plan have a charge attached to
its use that will recoup some of the costs of its
creation.
ti O
Page 3 of 3 pages
' y
d. Stuart/SunnXdale - A pipe system Is needed to collect
water trom nort of Kings Row off Sunnydale, Valley
View, and Stuart Road. 'The water will be piped to
Cooper Creek on the east side of Stuart Road.
198Y-90:
A. Hollyhill/Long j Le - A major storm pipe system needs
to run up Longridge from Teasley Lane to Hollyhill to
collect the large amounts of water coming out of
Southridge. Ihis project will not build all the
other collection storm lines (an additional $300,000
Is needed). It will address the most serious part of
the current flooding problem.
B. Loma Del dez - The entire Singing Uaks Subdivision
e'ween'tbM'ockingbird and Loop 288 from Kingfisher down
to Hummingbird was built with no storm sewer
systems. The street damage and home flooding on
Uriole, Hummingbird, Cardinal and Kingfisher streets
s
ground how the amount of water that currently flows above
coordinated Lwith hthe construction of Loop project 288 sin othe
same year since the drainage outfall will need to run
down Loop 288 to just south of McKinney. The State
will not allow construction prior to that which could
adversely effect their design. Therefore, the
outfall will be pro erly Incorporated into their
plans. 'r he size of their project will provide
economies of scale.
i 19YU•Y1:
A. James Street - The culvert on Janes Street is greatly
under Meet
The State will be rebuilding Ft. Worth
Drive the same year. They will upgrade the under
sized culvert there which will allow more water to
reach James Street faster, It will be a necessity
that the James Street culvert be upgraded at the same
time Hopefully, if funds allow, some channel
• shaping can be done to create the proper sized earth
channel frog Ft. Korth Drive south past Janes Street.
0418E
~ a
w
i ~
MY of DdINroN D/NrON, MUS ?e201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 19, 1986
TO: Blue Ribbon Citizens Committee
FRUM: Drainage Subcommittee
SUBJECT: Final Recommendation for Bond Issue
The meeting of September 17, 1986 was the second by the
Drainage Subcommittee. A consensus recommendation was reached
to keep the original 3.461 million dollars. The grouping of
those projects by the proposed year are as follows:
1986 - 87
Pecan Creek $ 1109000
Woodrow Bridge 250,000
Stuart/Selene SO,OO0
Study Drainage Regulations 251000
Taylor Park 3000000
Burning Tree 64,000
Audra Lane : 9~ p~tl0 0p
1987 - 88
Willow Springs 337,000
Teasley SO1000
• Melone 2S00000
Burning Tree Bridge ISO 000
$ 1988 - 89
o Update Master Drainage Plan 425,000
Stuart/Sunnydale 3S 00
$
e
q
•
Page 1 of 2 pages
lyB9 - g0
Hollyhill/Longridge $ 300,000
Loma Del Rey $--4.90
1990 - 91
Ft, North Drive/James Street
TOTAL PACKAGE $3,461,000
The committee agreed 'o spread out the projects over 5 eaors
more evenly provided the first year is not touched r
adjusted. Hill Claiborne, chairman, will make the presentation
to the Blue Ribbon Committee with drainage a$ a separate
$3,4611000 bond Issue.
U413B
•
Y+
P'a
_ . rivtYi-,• 4 iM_.. r; t E":• `,v t_^i Vr.U~'i.n~~
•
a,
•
I
i
LIBRARY/CITY HALL/LAW ENFORCEMENT/COURT
1
•
0 0 P L r'9 n ?.~.YA~. bra
y
Q
M
CITy of DMON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL SUILOINO ! 215 E. MCKINNEY ST. ! DENTON, TEXAS 7820
K E H 0 R A N D O K
TOs Hugh Ayer. Chairman, CIP Committee
FROK3 Joe Holland, Chairman, CIP Sub Group
DATE% October 2, 1986
SUBJECTS CIP Recommendation for Space Expansion/Library
We feel the City should move on the space expansion i•sus as soon as
possible and tLat the first consideration should be the building of
a new Law Enforcement/Court Complex which would meet most o! our
immediate needs. After a tour of the existing police facility, we
feel that they have no options for future growth at their site. Due
to inadequate parking, no room for future office growth, and .limited
jail area, we feel there is an immediate need for a new cosplex.
This wouldi
1) Give the police an adequate facility and room for future growth
and expansion.
2) Reduce the crowded conditions at City Hall by allowing City
employees to use the 22#000 square feet freed up at the existing
police station.
3) Enable us to got out of all of our rental c ncracie and move
Pi 411 those departments to either City Hall or the existing police
4i~ station.
After much discussion and review, we would like to unanimously
recommend the following facilities and year of considerationo
1st Year Law Enforcement/Court Complex $2.6 million C
86-87
• 3rd Year Land Acquisition/Parking Development $ .4 million
88-89 for Library Expansion 0 0
Sth Year Expansion of Library $ .66 million
90-91
TOTAL $3.6 million
81715688100 D!FW METRO 134.2320
• 0
i- a
0
This request is an increase of 1950,000 over the original $2.63
million suggested in the CIP recommendation. Our increases are as
follows
1) Added $350,000 to the $250,000 originally met aside for the
library expansion. The total $600,000 would allow a 10,000
sq.ft. expansion at the library.
11 Inserted $400,000 for the purchase of land and the development
of that land as parking for the expanded library. By expanding
the library we could lose up to half of the existing parking.
This land purchase would provide for that lost parking as well
as provide tt.. ixpanded parking necessary to cover the larger
facility. '
3) Added $200.000 sore to the 12.4 million not aside. for expansion
of city facilities to allow for the. construction of a new law
enforcement/court -complex at $2.5 million and the regovation_of
the existing police station at $100,000 for 'oity offices. The
committee felt that the most logical location for this new
facility was the McKinsey/Woodrow Lane area. it is suggested
that this be built as close to the county's law enforcement
center as possible.
oe Holland
10:M00743
•
t
O
D
O
a1
LAW EWrORCENUT/COURT BUILDING
° Cost for court and offices (approx. 30000 sq.ft.)
finish out cost 165-170 per sq.ft.
° Cost for police offices (approx. 21,500 sq.ft.)
Finish out coat 160-165 per sq.ft.
° Cost for new jail (approx. 3,500 sq.ft.)
Finish out cost - 4904105 per sq.ft.
° Renovation of old cell area (APProx. 1,645 sq.ft.)
Finish out cost $40-445 per sq.ft. .
° Renovation of entry
Finish out cost 110,000 to $lS,000
0 Total cost for new building (approx. 28,000 eq.ft.)
Minimum cost 11.80 million
Maximum cost 12.00 maximum
o Total cost for renovation of old building
Minimum cost 4100,000
Maximum cost 11101000
° Land (10 acres at 150,000/acre) 15000000
° Parking lots (150) 11000000
o Estimated Total Package
minimum cost 12.5 million
Maximum cost 12.7 million
Pc0s cons
o Coat savings from ° Land Purchase would be needed
elimination of lease ° Location needs to have dual
O o space street exit4encrance 0
Provide space for immediate o Parking is limited at the
needs located close to the o existing police station
city H111
° Renovation of the existing
Previous renovation inveatment o police station
of police headquarters is more police office area
secured and put tq3 use may be needed
Pros`
Cons
o Centralization of police and
o courts
Mew building can be designed
f= .=sture expansion of both
° police and courts
Relieves eome traffic and people
o congestion at city !fall
More Rarketable to citizens
° Leaves open the option of
expanding City Nall or moving
o to another location
Solves vehicle parking problem
for police
O .
•
to
0
ATHLETIC FIELDS/NEIGHBORHOOD AND SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS
•
7~.' ~L { (,fib'. . r
1
i
s
LDE)) M
CI rY o/osNSON, r<XA8 civic Conte. 1381 reminner I Denton, rrxas 70lOt
M E M O R A N D U M
TOs Hugh Ayer, Chairman, CIP Committee
FROMe Kathy Orr, Chairperson, CIP Sub Group
DATES September 29, 1986
SUBJECSs CIP Recommendation for Recreation Facilities
Recreation facility expansion was discussed by our group and was
felt to be an important part of this Capital Improvements Program.
After a presentation by the Parks and Recreation staff detailing the
overcrowding and lack of existing facilities, we brought in many
athletic groups, neighborhood groups, and senior citizen
organizations that echoed those same concerns. Our group decided to
recommend three new centers due to the tremendous need for
recreation facilities in our community. Those would be 20,000
square feet facilities which would be built in the northeast, east,
and southeast areas of town. We also recommend expanding the Senior
Center by 10,000 square feet and developing additional parking and
outdoor areas at that location.
Athletic fields were also considered a priority, and our final
recommendation and the total cost of these was increased from $1.2
million to $1.3 million to allow for one lighted soccer field at
North Lakes Park, The rest of the developcoat includes two new
soccer fields at Dania and renovation of the softball fields at
Dania. Five new soccer and four new lighted softball fields at
North Lakes Perk. Lighting four baseball and two softball fields at
Evers Parke modify the softball field to baseball, renovate field t7
and develop field 18 ilso at Evers.
After much discussion and review, we would like to unanimously
recommend the following facilities and year of considerations
0 . 0
' ~lnl~tal Vold tit e+ t
i'edal t~iawtd A4M"
Denton Parke and Roerorllon / Denion, rexas / (017) 800.0170
. p
Week
,
Q
v
I
I
a
;age - 2
I
let Year East Community Center 11.2 million
86-87 Athletic Field Development .25 million 11.45 zillion
2rd Year Senior Center aspansion .75 million
87-$8- Athletic Field Development .35 million 11.10 million
3rd Year Community Center 11.3 million
88-89 Athletic Field Development .25 million 11.55 million
4th Year Athletic Field Development 1 .25 million
"9-90- Land Acquisition (S acres) .2S million 1 .50 million
Sth Year Community Center 11.4 million
90-91. Athletic Field Development .20 million 1.60 million
TOTAL 16.20 million
This request is an increase of $650,000 from the origihil'$S.5S
million suggested In the CIP recommendation. Our increases are as
followsm
1) Added 1100,000 to the amount for athletic fields for lighting
one soccer field at North Lakes Park.
2) Changes the original two center concept to three and increased
the funds for their construction (1300,000) from $3.6 million to
$3.9 million due to inflationary adjustments during the five
year period.
3) Added 1250,000 for the purchase of land during the fourth year
so that there will be a center site available when the third
center is built in year five.
The group is also concerned about the sarketing of these issues and
would be happy to assist the Council after a decision is made on
what to include and when,
th Zr
MEM00733
4'
•
c►
o
0
SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
Recreation Centers
Costs
$1.2 'Billion for lot year, $1.3 million for 3rd year,
=1.4 million for Sth year
3750,000 for land acquisition in the 4th ear
Sizes 20,000
Y
stt.
Locations Northeast.Denton# East Denton, Southeast Denton
Descriptions Centers would include a gymnasium, multipurpose room, N
gamerooms meeting rooms, offices, storage, and others
areas as funds permit.
Benefits of Recreation Center Expansion
° Additional gymnasium space could permit c
on of athletic
expansion open plays and therapeutic recreation o
will have a positive effect on revenues and pportunities which I
participation.
° Additional centers would provide greater service area. for
community allowing more individuals to have- greater' access to m
centers and programs.
o Community education classes could be offered at centers allowing
for expansion and continuity of scheduling.
° Cultural arts area could be incorporated into one of the centers
allowing for expansion in this program area.
° Dance area could be incorporated into one of the centers allowing k
for expansion in this program area.
° Additional space would allow for therapeutic recreation ;
programming at centers which would evenly spread the program
throughout the community.
° Additional meeting room space would provide more opportunities for
service organizations and clubs to utilize facilities.
° Gymnastics room would enable growth in this
for creation of a team. Program area and allow
is
° Additional multipurpose room space would allow for the expansion
of neighborhood special events programs,
° Additional multipurpose room space would allow for teen center and
expansion of programming for this age group.
ti
Additional classroom space would allow for the expansion f
p outdoor education classes in area in which we are currentoly • •
deficient.
0 Additional multipurpose and classroom space would allow for the
expansion of the pre-school program which, currently operates at
maxlmim.
• 0
• I
R
•
1
Senior Center
Costs $750,000
Sigel 10,000 sq.ft. expansion
Locations Bell Avenue
Descriptions The expansion would include a large multipurpose
room, cafeteria style kitchen, gameroom, arts/crafts
room, meeting rooms, health services room, and
officts. The cost will also allow for expanded
parking and an enlarged patio.
Benefits of Senior Center Expansion
° Could provide work areas that could accommodate representatives e
from various social service agencies such as Social Security,
Human Resources, RSVP, Legal Services, and Income Tax.
o hilow the reading room to be expanded.
° Provide large covered patio area for outdoor activities, breakfast
program, and reading area. v
° Commercial kitchen could provide for rentals, special events, and
lunch program additions.
0 Gym/fitness area could provide space for exercise, volleyball,
self defense, walking, and dance programs.
° Separate classrooms which could be used for adult classes and
meetings only.
° Area for cultural or craft programs such as ceramics, pottery,
jewelry.
° Increased storage availability.
° Increased office apace, current a' .e is extremely
inadequate.
° Additional meeting rooms could r0 space for cltifi
meetings, rentals, and departmental i. I
• ° Would provide more opportunities t, he resources of the
elderly by creating more opportunit.: ttAe■ to find new role
and to develop latent or new skills.
o Provide better environment in which seniors will feel safe to test
new ideas and behavior.
• ° Would prcvide for the needs of the Domino Club. = ` (s
o A separate gameroom would provide for a tremendous amount of {
increased play which is interrupted now by many other activities
and limited by other space needs.
,
• 0
i
_ a
f
. S
Athletic Fields
3
Cost, 11.3 million
Location, Evers Park, Denis Park, and North Lakes Park
Description, Light and renovate Fields at Evers, develop softball
and soccer fields at North Lakes, renovate softball s
fields and develop soccer fields at Denia.
7 new soccer fields U lightei)
4 new lighted softball fields
2 new baseball fields
Light 4 baseball, 2 football fields
Benefits of Athletic Field Expansion
0 All youth and adult sports programs will be able to
500 with new and lighted fields. grow at least ,
0 All sports programs will have such sore available practice time if
this expansion takes place. At this time, areas for practice are'
at a premium.
0 New alternative leagues can be started to get more individuals
involved with our sports programming.
0 All league play will be moved from neighborhood park fields so
neighborhoods are not bothered by noise, cars, and litter.
O
1
1
• 0 <t1A
s: ~tb , td
r
i
i
I '
,Y
k-
ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER/FIRE STATION/EQUIPMENT
•
• 0 t { , i Us e;:~ * ~ ~ ~ d .,.318 kc'.~i ~
•
4a
•
CITY Of DENTON {
DENTON, TEXAS 76201
Dctoter 6, 1966
Mr. Hugh Ayer
C.I.P. Chairperson
475 Mimosa
Denton, Texas 76701
Dear Mr. Ayers
In order to provide fire and emergency medical service protection to the
citizens of Denton and surrounding areas, I will address three r3) areas
of consideration. The first is the present Capital Improvements Program
which includes one (I) new fire sub-station at a cost of $450,000, s
hopefully this station will be put in service in 1988. The second area
is the upcoming Capital Improvements Program which includes one (1) fire
sub-station at a cost of $500,000 and a new pumper apparatus complete
with equipment at a cost of 5700,000.
The justification for the reed of the new fire sub-stations and neces-
,h
sary apparatus and personnel has been provided in the recent packet,
this justification is based on the recent study made by Public Technolo-
gy, Inc. on station needs and site location. The two (2) site locations
being Bonnie Brae and Windsor and Teasley and Lillian Miller Parkway.
We plan to put in service these two (2) stations in this manner.
Complete and occupy the two (2) stations In 1988. Locate one (1) new
station, new pumper apparatus, and •-*lvs (12) new personnel at Bonnie
Brae and Windsor. Locate one (1) new fire station at Teasley and
Lillian Miller Parkway with one 11) pumper and twelve {12) personnel
from Central Station. What this will do is put six (6) fire stations in
operation with six (6) fire engine crews twenty-four (24) hours a day
along with a complement of ambulance and aerial truck crews.
The third area I want to mention is a need that v_ rt have to be ad-
dressed very soon. Teep in mind that new apparatus ha.i approximately
fourteen (14) months delLvery time from order date, piece of appara-
tus that will be needed soon is an aerial for each 35,40 population or
a fracticn thereof. Our population is fast approaching the need for a
p seccnd aerial apparatus since we already have one. Thim need is nct • •
only for satisfying the State Board of insurance, but for the protection
of lives and property. The present aerial apparatus has a 75 foot s
Y,
c
• 0
•
•
r
Mr. Hugh Ayer
Cctcber 6, 1926
Page 2
reach, the next nne should be not less than 100 feet in order
greater distance. to reach a
a,
The source information contained in this letter comes from several
peoPle, namely, Paul Peed, Acting Fire Chief, Jack Jarvis, Motor Pool
Administrators James Thomason, Emergency Medical Coordinators and State
Board of Insurance Pating Schedule.
Attached •-ou will find a time schedule that could be followed in order
to accomPlish these needs.
O
•
r
O
1
i
Mr. Hugh Ayer
October 6, 1986
Page 3 ;.:F.
RECOMMENDATION
DENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIFE SUB-STATION AND EQUIPMENT
{
First Priority
- 1988 89
New Fire Sub-Station (1) $500,000
New Fire Apparatus (1) 200,009
TOTAL 5700,000
Second Priority 1988-89
Replacement Fire
Apparatus (1) $200,000 From Operational Budget
Replacement Ambulance (1) 50,000 From Operational Budget
TOTAL 5250,000
Third Priority 1990-91
New Aerial Fire Truck (1) S", 000
TOTAL 5100,000
NOTEI One (1) Fire Sub-station has already been a
Recommendation is that it be built in 1988-89roved for 5450,000,
•
r
1' • r WrMr ~L i - rte.... 1
• ~ - J tJ1A e 6 •",r+i z,~ ris
C>
Mr. H„gh Ayer
Octcber 6, 2936
Page 4
3g~
it
FUNDING CF PROPOSED "r
ANIMAL CONTPOL CENTEP EXPANSION
The following Information represents the total financfrel impact on
the
City for the proposed expansion of the Animal Contol Centet
should
Denton County and the Denton Humane Society choose not to participate in
the expansion.
Ne- racility Expansion
Existlny Facil-ty Improvements $190,104
Fencini an.! A%-;.ings 9,000
Architectural and Engineering Fees 8,000
15,000
Sub-total $225,104
Adoption Center Construction
S 60,000
TOTAL CUST $285,204
City of Denton Contribution
Denton County Contribution $185,204
Humane Society Contribution 40,000
60,600
TOTAL $285,104
The Denton Humane Sc,ciety has been receptive to our proposal on the
Adoption Center construction and we feel that arrangements can be worked
out to secure their involvement in this project. rn addition, Denton
County has Included $40,000 in their 1986-87 budget for their contribu-
0 tion to the Center expansion.
Given the critical need far the Center expansion and the fact that the
County has appropriated funding this fiscal year, it is the recoru enda-
ticn of our sub-committee that this project be Included in the first
year of the plan. Additionally, we feel that it Is essential the City
include a minimum of $185,104 in the plan for the expansion of the
Center. 0
p
•
Mr, Hugh Ayer
Cctober 6, 1986
Page 5
SC
Should you have any corcnents or questions on these matters, please let
me know.
Y
5
I
Bob Gorton
C.I.P. Sub-committee Chairman
BG/sc
F" 3
j
I
I
IIII
i
II
I
i
I
II
•
i
•
533
City Council Minutes
February 12, 1985
The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at 7:00 2.m. in r
the Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tem Chew; Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, and Riddlesperger
City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary 3
ABSENT: Council Member Stephens
1. :he Council received the recommendation of the Bond
Committee regarding the proposed street bond election.
Mr. Keith Appleton, Chairperson of the Street Bond Committee,
reported that the committee had been working in four groups, one for
each quadrant of the city. A study had been done of the streets in
each quadrant and a value for distress points had been assigned to
the streets as well as a cost for repairs. These streets had then s
been ranked by each subcommittee according to use and importance.
The entire committee had reviewed the ranking, made changes and made
a final list for recommendation to the Council. The committee was
recommending a total bond issue of $10,000,000 which would allow
approximately 14 1/2 miles of streets to be built and 20 miles of
streets to be repaved and overlaid. This amount would not require
an increase in taxes, had no political ramifications and all four `V
districts of Denton were included. (A copy of the Street Study
Ranking is attached to and made a part of these Minutes.)
r
Mayor Pro Tem Chew stated that his only concern was that $10,000,000
would not be adequate to meet the street repair needs.
-F
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that this would be a good start
and that perhaps other means of funds would be accessible in the
future. The intent was to arrive at a point where the repairs could
be done on a "pay as you go" basis. Future Councils might have to
approach the voters again for another bond issue.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the $10,000,000 would get things
going and the Council could consider an increase the the street
budget over the next few years.
Mayor Stewart stated that this bond issue would be a start. with
normal expansion and growth, more funds could be dedicated in the
budget in the future which might offset the need for a future bond
issue.
Mr. Appleton stated that everyone on the committee as well as the
Council would have liked to have repaired or rebuilt all of the
streets, but the situation had to be viewed realistically and in
conjunction with the upcoming school bond election.
Council Member Alford stated that this had been a very good working
committee on the street problem and hoped that it might be the
beginning of more community involvement with city issues.
Council Member McAdams stated that the Council should keep in mind
that funding for projects without a tax increse was a normal
operating procedure. The bond issue would allow the city to do more
with the street sooner and was a good way to operate.
• Council Member Hopkins stated that a long term concern was that the
city was going to need a north/south and east/west corridor. These
cross-city thoroughfares should be considered soon. This was not
the intent of this particular bond issue but should be kept in mind,
Mr. Appleton stated that the street committee did not took at
extensions of streets, only repairs. e
Hopkins motion, Chew second to receive the recommendation of the x
Bond Committee. Motion carried unanimously.
ZN.
e
~3y
City Council Minutes
Meeting of February 12, 1985
Page Two
2. The Council considered setting a date for a street bond
election.
+
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that staff had checked
with First Southwest Company, the city's legal advisors, and the
City Attorney's office regarding advertising requirements prior to
the bond election. An ordinance calling the bond election could be
placed on the February 19 Council agenda. The earliest date on
which the election could be held would be March 16. The Bond
Committee's recommendation was to hold the election as soon as
possible and there was a legal requirement that the election must be
held within 90 days from the date the ordinance was approved calling
the election.
Council Member Hopkins stated that he wanted to be sure that all
those concerned with the bond election were absolutely ready to go.
lie further stated that staff should proceed with taking bids to
expedite the actual repairs.
Council Member McAdams asked if an election date of March 16 would
give the Bond Committee ample time to advertise and promote the
election.
Mr. Keith Appleton responded that March 16 was the first day of
Spring Break for the public schools and the two universities. The
consensus of the Bond Committee was that March 30 would be the b?st
date.
Council Member McAdams stated that March 30 was only one week before
the City Council election on April 6 and felt there was some merit
to a larger spacing.
F
Council Member Hopkins asked for the thoughts of the other Council
Members on having both elections on April 6.
Council Member Stephens joined the meeting.
Council Member Alford stated that he did not believe the bond
election should be held with the Council election.
City Manager Hartung stated that the bond election should not have
political overtones.
Council Member Stephens stated that the street bond issue was a
political one and would it not be more objectionable to spend money
for two elections rather than just one.
Council Member Hopkins stated that a recent seminar hosted by the
National, League of Cities had stated that holding this type of joint
election was not advisable.
Mayor Pro Tem Chew asked about holding the bond election in
mid-April.
Council Member Hopkins stated that this would coincide with the
income tax filing deadline and might not be an appropriate time for
the bond election.
e Mr. Appleton stated that if held in mid- to late March, the Bond
Committee would endeavor to reach students and faculty and encourage
them to vote absentee if they were going to be away during Spring
Break.
Dr. Darrell Bulls, member of the Bond Committee, stated that the
emphasis would be on reaching those voters who were interested In y
the streets and encouraging them to vote absentee.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to set the date for the street bond
election for March 13.
r
0 -)7
•
C)
STREET STUDY RANKINGS 81
Boundaries Distress
Street Name From To
d~~a Costs PoTlnts -
Hillcrest Scripture Emery 47,018 60 11N6rw
Avenue C Mulberry Oak 15 798 44
Bolivar Congress University 40,054 44
Kings Row Stuart Sherman 40,445 44
Elm Prairie Highland 7,899 46
Magnolia New Asphalt Hinkle 14,44S 47
Elm Congress Oak 26,S88 50
Stuart Kings Row Coronado 34,667 52
Elm Mulberry Prairie 15,798 55
Hercules Picadilly Sheraton 17,334 S5
Carroll Northridge Ross 29,040 S7
Oak Austin Bolivar 17,424 61
f Hercules Redstone Stuart 26,400 62
Stuart Hercules Kings Row 25,112 66 l
Locust Hickory Oak
5,628 42
Withers Oakland 'dingo 17,334 43 >
Robinwood Emerson University 34,668 44 `
Paisley Woodford Hettie 8,085 45
Locust Oak McKinney 4,431 46
Paisley Frame Ruddell 13,857 46
First Bolivar f.ocust 81657 46 °
i Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywoid 40,445 37
Kings Row Sherman Yorkshire 23,118 49
Mockingbird McKinney Oriole 100' 28,889 51
Locust McKinney Congress 15,798 51
Emerson Freedom Wilsonwood 86,669 52
Austin McKinney Mulberry 8,666 S3
Audra McKinney End of Divide 29,480 S4
Locust Mulberry Hickory 5,628 SS
Mingo Withers Mockingbird 116,160 58
Old North Road University Mill Pond 27,720 S9
Frame RRX S. McKinney 17,424 61
Nottingham University Windsor 57,869 62
Greenwood Cherrywood Sherman 11,616 64
Locust University Sherman Drive 5,662 64
Elm University Congress 53,440 66
Paisley Nettie Ruddell 4,356 66
Pertain Mingo Wayne 4,356 66
McCormick Parvin Wlllowwood 17,334 49
Hollyhill Ridgecrest Tennyson 63,SS7 S1
Avenue D Highland IH-35 14,44S S4
~Fobson Lane Teasley FN-1830
~9C / onnie Brae Riney Windsor 3978 6S
7?(4o,2-1 / 8onnleBraeWindsor University 301,SS76
7 771 ,70 Bonnie Brae University Scripture 899,984 90 /s
I Scripture IH-35 Bonnie Brae 347,907 99 ~o
West Oak 1H-35 Y 207,876 114 ,30
HickoryAvenue C Bonnie Brae 372 479 1 0
2 Oak Bolivar Jagoe 461,440 70 /oo
3 Hickory Avenue C Welch 200,547 72 ,40
2 Magnolia New Asphalt Bolivar 176,991 74 .3o
Bolivar Northridge University 471,615 76 .7o
2 Fry Scripture Oak 113,740 78 to
$5 2 Stuart Selene Hercules 1Z3059S 78 J>
85 Hickory Carroll Cedar 105,045 79 ./o
X z Weicft Mulberry Hickory 53,694 79 ./o
• 85 2 Pershing- Stuart Atlas 79,020 97 ,to
gb 44 Avenue C 1H-35 Mulberry 556,781 85 ,70
3 Locust
8S Sherman Orr 4730218 19
3 Audrs End of Divide Paisley 61,244 83
3 Glenwood Windsor University 387,739 85 ,70
gQ 4 Avenue A i, Highland McCormick 110,028 75 ss
$b 4 Acme pp~.Bernard Fort Worth Dr. 61,302 94 r
O lfl,f aElm ; Eaghtand Eagle 314.516
8S -f, • O
$~;2,I West k r~Bonnie Brae MMulbe ulberry 321,295 71 7o
33~i +~ot+tress-~ 6P Oakland Ponder S5 176 69 9S
e6,,?3 Hickory-/ iCedar Austin 116,950 74 ,20
$4,4 Teasley Lane Dallas Drive Ryan Road 11000,000 12,e4
EB'3 Congress University 492,095 A2 ,70
Total Street Cost for Rank 01 $9 735,044
20.0 Miles Repave and Overlay 14.45 Miles Rebuild
• 0
•
c►
STREET STUDY RANKINGS 01
o n. Street Name Boundaries Distress
From To Costs o'i Tnts
Hillcrest Scripture Emery 47,018 60
2 Avenue Mulberry Oak 15,798 44 to~
zi 98livar Congress University 40,051 44 ao
Kings Row Stuart Sherman 40,445 44
z ZIA. Prairie Highland
Magolia New Asphalt Hinkle 7,899 db
y0~
as~
2( Congress Oak 14,44S 47
26,588 50
t .30
a t Kings Row Coronado 34,667 S2 ,40
~ IIJL- Mulberry Prairie 1S,798 55 .20
t Herculpj Picadilly Sheraton 17,334 S5 .30
Carrot Northridge Ross 29,040 S7
Oak Austin Bolivar 17,424 61
Hercules Redstone Stuart 26,400 62
Stuart Hercules kings Row 23,112 66
9 L Hickory Oak j
3 Oakland Mingo 17,334 43 r
' Robinwood Emerson University 3
Paisley Woodford Hrttie 8,085 45 20LOCUS& Oak 1
IJ Paisley Frame McKinney 4,431 46 45-1
0
3 Ruddell 13,857 46 .40
First Bolivar Locust 8,667 46 1-r
i3 Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywood 40,445 47 7a;
3 Sherman Yorkshire 23,118 49 314I
.3 MoC na bg if rd McKinney Oriole 100' 28,889 So'
!.3 Locust McKinney Congress 151798 51 .to
3 Emer on Freedom Wilsonwood 86,659 52 iso
3 Austin McKinney Mulberry 8,666 S3 /S
.3 Audra McKinney End of Divide 29,480 54 30
3` Locust Mulberry Hickory 5,628 55 of
Mingo Withers Mockingbird 116,160 S8
Old North Road University Mill Pond 27,720 59
Frame RRX S. McKinney 17,424 61
Nottingham University Windsor 57,869 62
Greenwood Cherrywood Sherman 11,616 64
Locust University Sherman Drive 5,662 64
Elm University Congress SS,640 66
f Paisley Nettie Ruddell 4,355 66 a
Pertain Mingo Wayne 4 3S6 66
.}t .S rm ck Parvin Wiilowwood 17,334 49 .30
14 HollyhIll- Ridgecrest Tennyson 63,557 SI //o I
4, ayenjig D- Highland IH-35 cn ~.Zf
Hobson one Teasley FM-1830 ~~oi S4
Bonnie Brae Riney Windsor 56
59 Ufa 7S L
Bonnie Brae Windsor University 301,SS7 77
Bonnie Brae University Scripture 899,984 90
Scripture 1H-35 Bonnie Brae 347,907 99
West Oak IH-3S Y 207,816 114
Hickory Avenue C Bonnie Brae 372,479 72
I Oak Bolivar Jagoe 461,440 70
Hickory Avenue C Welch 200,547 72
Magnolia New Asphalt Bolivar 176,991 74
Bolivar Northridge University 471,615 76
Fry Scripture Oak 113 740 78
Stuart Selene Hercules 123,595 78
Hickory Carroll Cedar 105,045 79
Welch Mulberry Hickory 53,694 79
• Pershing Stuart Atlas 79,020 97
Avenue C iH-35 Mulbeiry 556,781 8S G
Locust Sherman Orr 473,218 79
Audra End of Divide Paisley 61,244 83
I Glenwood Windsor University 387l739 8S
f Avenue A Highland McCormick 210,028 7S
Acme Bernard Fort Worth Dr. 61,302 94
p Elm Highland Eagle 314,S16 8S • Q
Locust Eagle Mulberry 47,916 S7
West Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe 111,11S 71
Congress Oakland Ponder S5176 69
Hickory Cedar Austin
74
Teasley Lane Dallas Drive Ryan Road 1 000 000
I I Locust Congress University ~682~095
82
Total Street Cost for Rank 11 $9 73S,044
10.0 Miles Repave and Overlay 14.45 Miles Rebuild
• O
•
c~
Wye
STREET STUDY RANKINGS 01
Boundaries
Q ° Street Name Froi To Distress
I ~ HCo sts Tnts« oiMarw
est Scripture Emery
Avenue Mulberry Oak 47,018 60 Gs
Bolivar Congress IS,798 44
Kings Row Stuart University 40,OS4 44
Elm Prairie Highland 40.445 44
Magnolia New Asphalt Hinkle 7'699 46
Elm Congress Oak 14,445 47
Stuart Kings Row Coronado 26,588 SO
t Elm Mulberry Prairie 34,667 S2
Hercules Picadilly Sheraton IS'798 55
Z Carte Northridge Ross 17,334 SS
2' -9R1L_ Austin 8°livar 29,040 57 Sol
He---rte Redstone Stuart 17'424 61 'Zol`
Stuart Hercules 26,400 62 u'
Locust Kings Row 23,112 66 ,4o,
Withers Hickory Oak
Oakland Mi 5,628 42
' R
Paisl obinwood ngo Emerson Universit! 17,334 43 i
Locusty WOOdford Hettie 34,668 44
Oak gloss
rame McKinney 4,431 45
Paisley F
Ruddell 4,431 46 5
First Bolivar 13,851 46 P
f a Greenwood gLocust
Laurel Wood 8,667 46
Cherryuood 40, s
Mockingbird Sherman Yorkshire 23,118 37
Y Oriole 100 ,118 J9
Locust McKinney Congress 28,889 S1
Emerson Freedom Wilsonwood 15,798 SI i,
Austin McKinney Mulberry 86,669 S2 i.
Audra McKinney
Locust Mulberry End Of Divide 29,480 Sj
H!°k°[
3j Withers y 5,628 SS
~3 i o t Road University WMocknbi ill 1Pond rd 116,160
60 - L
SB ta
27 16,1 720
3 F am RRX S. McKinney 17 424 S9
i Afott~np~_ University Windsor 61
3 Ssee__ nod Cherrywood Sherman 57,869 62
a
2 11,616 64 aEo
University Sherman Drive
University 5,662 3! 64 iv
Hettie Ruddell ALLUL Congress 55,440 66 ,70
II=r 4,3S6 66 iD
McC oal~k PMingo arvin 3lawwo 4,356 66 ,io
Hollyhill Wi
Rid ecrest od 17,334 49
Avenue D Highland Tennyson 63,SS7 S1
~4 Hobson Lane Teasley IH-35 14,445 54
Bonnie ran Rine 30 _S~.Ii94_ 56
Bonnie Brae Windsor Windndso 397,876 7S
Bonnie Brae Universit University 301 557 77
Scripture I y Scripture 899,984 90
West Oak IH--35 3S Bonnie Brae 347,907 gg
Hickory Avenue C BY° 207,876 114
Oak Bolivar Jagonfe e Brae 372 4479
40 7)
Hic k o r y Avenue C Welch 7O
Magnolia New Asphalt Bolivar 100,547 72
Bolivar Northridge University 176,991 7q
F 7
ry Scripture Oak 411,615 76
Stuart Selene Hercules 113,740 78
Hickory Carroll Cedar 123,595 78
WeEch 105,015 79 r
Per shin Mulberry Hickory S3,694
79
• Avenue Stuart Atlas 5579 020
IH-35 Mulberry 6 781
97
Locust Sherman Orr 85
Audrawood End of Divide Paisley 473,218 79
Glen Windsor University 61'244 83
Avenue A Highland McCormick 387,739 gS
Acme Bernard Fort Worth Dr. 161,302 y`
Elm Highland Eagle
85
O Locust Eagle Mulberry 314,516 57
West Oak Bonnie Brae 71
Congress Oakland Jagoe 311,295 Hickory Cedar Ponder 55,176 69
Teasley Lane Dallas Drive Austin 116,950 74
Locust Congress Ryan Road 1,000,000
University 6821095 82
Total Street Cost for Rank 11 $9 735,044
20.0 Miles Repave and Overlay 14, 45 Miles Reboil Id
~y
0
0
I
BOND PROJECTS
PROJECT PROJECT EXPENSE
Residential St.
Assessment Paving $ 786,218
South Carroll Blvd.
Hickory to 1.35 S39,S02
Sherman Dr.-
Locust to City Limits 1,348,272
Drainage Study 182,110
Signal, Intersection
Revision 249,876
Bell - Industrial
McKinney - Eagle 839,842
Ave. E - Oak to 1.35 470,813
Bonnie Brae-
Scripture to 1.35 434,598
Windsor Drive
(Bonnie Brae to
Hinkle) 307,373
East McKinney 823,0.5
Cenral Fire Station 609,708
Duncan Signals 48,336
***Bell-Mingo Signals 39,963
,%'*Library Parking Lot 98,780
• "*"Library Channel 8210629 • 0
Y1
e
o
Bond Projects
Page 2
February 7, 1985
PROJECT PROJECT EXPENSE
"""Windsor Drive
(Locust to Hinkle) 401,950
Right-of-Way 99,787
"Carroll Extension (Deleted by the
Council after recommendation from
the Denton Development Guide Committee 12,000
Mingo 82,561
Loop 288 221,354
Police Building :,090,491
"Assessment Paving {Deleted by Council
after no requests were received for
four years 200,000
idewalks [13,249
"""i'eterbilt 46,985
D. 1. 1980 173,249
"""McCormick 101,393
Peach Street 39,235
NorthrJdge 300,538
Total, of 1973-1974 and
1977-:978 Bond ?ssues $109439,000
Total Cost of Above Projects $10,SB2,728.00
Bell-Coronado,
Paisley St., and
Ponder St. Drainage 612,436
• Panhandle Drainage 767,617
""R,O.W. for U.S.380 200,000
""Stanley, Thomas, Ector
Drainage 1,124,000
'r G A'
~ a~t~
i
•
1
•
i
I
I
i
I
I
i
Bond Projects
Page 3
February 7, 1985
PROJECT PROJECT EXPENSE i
"Signal improvements (Eagle-
Bell Intersection) 100,000
"Prairie (Bradshaw to {
Lakey) Drainage 166,000 ,
"Update Signal Equipment 10,000
""Yellowstone, Sheraton i
Drainage 724,000
i
""Reconstruction of I
U.S. 380 700,000
"Projects proposed which were not com,.eted, j
""These items are proposed improvements which are pending.
"""Additional projects that were built usi-ig bond money. j
210::
I
I
i
i
I
i
•
1
i
i
I
~ r
•
I c)
•
,
L
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Funding Scnedule
i
1983 - 1984
,;r.anley, Tnonas, Ector Drainage
Parts I and II $ 1,124,000
a.S. 380 R.O.W. Acquisition 200,000
$ 1,324,000
1984 - 1985
Prairie Street Drainage $ 166,000
'cllowstone - Sneraton Drainage 714,000
L'pd.+te Signal Equipment 10,000
$ 900,000
1985 - 1986
::Itcling F,cnds for U. S. 380 S 700,000
Eire 5uostatJon 450,OUO
$ 1,150,000
1986 - 1987
!D-.a Uel Ray Drainage $ 525,000
6riC,ge on Woodrow Lane 250,U00
??construct Oriole Street 117,000
sidewalk cn Fig^cules 15,000
Sidewalk near ?roposed School (Windsor) 30,000
raffic Signals 25,000
•
$ 1,262,000
1987 - 1988
Iaprove Woocireu i.ane $ 523,000 '
• Stuart Roaa - Selene Drainage 320,000 • •
:i11ou Springs Uraina5e 337 UOU
Fratfic 6ignals _ 25,000
1,207,000
05d:ab
u/2/83
0 0 If
wr_ '
c,
0
s
$1,000,000
QTY OF DEN1w TEXAS
FlmFCM am W 08E.fCraIQ no
SERIFS 1985
DATED: May 1, 1985 FIRST CPN DICE: 5/1/86
PRINCIPAL DUE: 5/1 INTFRFST DUE: 5/1 11/1
YEAR
9/30 REWBUF2427Ig LFA.L _ O, , LSSUBTREMENS
1985 $ 2,318,907 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 21318,907
1986 2,158,025 50,000 147,500 197,500 2,355,525
1987 2,027,857 50,000 92,500 142,500 2,170,357
1988 1,967,906 50,000 87,500 137,500 2,105,406
1989 2,333,322 50,000 82,500 1320500 2,465,822
1990 1,642,145 50,000 77,500 127,500 1,769,645
1991 1,566,813 50,000 72,500 122,500 1,689,313
1992 1,482,269 50,000 67,500 117,500 11599,769
1993 1,421,719 50,000 62,500 112,500 1,534,219
1994 1,389,062 50,000 51,500 107,500 1,496,562
1995 1,224,283 50,000 52,500 102,500 1,326,783
1996 1,165,256 50,000 47,500 97,50 1,262,756
1997 982,688 500000 42,500 92,5 . 1,075,188
1998 632,938 50,000 37,509 87,5UO 720,438
1999 597,626 50,000 32,50 82,500 680,126
2000 562,126 50,000 2/,501 77,500 639,626
2001 307,813 50,000 22,50 , 721500 380,313
2002 284,688 50,000 17050) 67,500 352,188
2003 261,563 50,000 129500 62,500 324,063
2004 50,000 7,500 57,500 57,500
2005 50,000 2,500 52,500 52,500
$ 24,327,006 $1,000,000 $1,050,000 $2,050,000 $ 26,377,006
LY1MV.ST rALCULATFD AT 10.0% FUR KPIF-6FS OF ILLUSTRATION.
• 1984/85 Taxable Assessed Valuation $1,154,036,258
Average Annual Requirements, 1986/2005:
New Debt---------------------------------------------- $ 102,500
Total Debt $1,202,905
0 • •
.JFHcG:ab
1321F
0 0
T.
•
C3,
•
1
1.
DEBT SERVICE REXPIRBiNPS
OMED ON A 9.875% CgOM FAC'1CA
ESTIMTW A`f PX SWr
ASSESSET 00UECfION OD J~1LON5 DEBT
YEAR VAUJE _ VAUJE PL 1/S SERVICE DLFTE FTa
1985 1,154,036,258 1,107,414,801 2,' . 063 2,318,'M 1219,98')
198b 1,267,997,338 1,217,277,444 2, ,5 ',42 2,158,025 3 179917
1967 1,393,212,075 1,337,483,592 2,1'0,441 2,027,857 b92,584
1988 1,539,791,7+8 1,4b9,`.00097 2,989,085 1,967,906 10021,179
089 1.1-61,957,455 1,b1404)/9,156 3,284,257 1,183,321 1,500,935
19`90 1,848,051?,753 1,774,128,122 3,608,577 1,692,145 1,91b,432
•
r • a
XICG:ab
1323E
1
G~t:w 1
i
O
1
•
•
Y,
gMEOAI IDIM:-4AN NAT
poili ll Awl IMIEAESI Ar O03mi11EMi5
1%/-95
Amount /rlnllpal 6 Interest 1.9u1refe1te toe
Isla Ma turIt7 Interest Awl Outlt4rtln 3%A-IS e,
ilea Oita _ Ale _--0ate of Iti,4 p.tOber 1, I~ I7M T-Il--TternT TZZ
1960 Street !Wovement 1-I5-60 r-IS-01 7.50 to 7.15 ( 600.0110 S 25,000 { 75,000 I 26,%1
T
1662 Street Ir -overnt 3-15-67 1-1547 2.75 ON I.:^ 500.000 60,000 70,000 1,100
1963 General 0 Vtlon 3.15-rd 3-31-11 7.50 t0 1.25 50O.Dou 10,000 20,000 11760 22,260
ISlreel I, semen!, fire Static
1966 Gel l OW An, 1-15-66 I-IS-56 3.30 to 5.00 I.t".000 120,000 60,000 I'm 13,150
ISI-eel, , . LI Ilep. Civic Ce 90,11
1967 Street trepri II-IS-61 6-15-19 4.2S 600, D00 150,000 30,000 1,775 U,375
1961 Street impr6. 2.01.61 1.1111 1.00 t0 5.00 I,OOO,D00 225,000 50,000 1,100 50,600
1762 Street 1wreve.mnl 1-111-59 1.15.09 $.ill to 6.54 1,205,000 33',100 70,000 11,190 17.590
1370 Stet! Impronrnt 9-IS-10 3 15-91 5.70 to 1.00 1,010,000 350,M0 50,000 19,150 19,150
1974 Street Invoo meet 7-IS-74 1-15-M 5.:S to 7,25 1,100,000 1,000,100 1003,00 $7,200 117,200
1671 6, 0, lefun6ln (ones 1.15.15 105-94 S.3s to 7.23 935,000 Sm. Xq SO,D00 HAD 71,6w
(North IAN Is I
1176 Cowell J61'10Uan 1-15-16 f-14S 4.50 W 6.60 1.300.000 1,125,000 125,000 11,150 201,2S0
13trett lnt, 14rls1
, 3,CC)D,DOO 7
1971 4nerN 111,111W" 1111,111W" 6 01-07 6-Ot.41 1.00 to 6 W
,100,OOD ISO.Ow 100,100 260.700
(Street Improvement, /arttl
111 1 0•4atel. of WIt9a110n -61-16 1.01.90 S. Ss I25,OOu 15.000 10,000 6,600 11,60
' Dams $"i
H.9 Ctnermi 01,111at1on 3-15.79 1 IS-O2 $.IS to 7.M. I,100,Ow 3,600,000 2.25,00 145,063 410.063
ISlnel, fire 6lel$co Spttone, tl6rtr.l
War CerllricOlee of O611pet1on 10-DI-19 t-ul-V 6-1S 170,000 1701OCo 0 11,675 11,115
(Al poet Iegrovemeatel
• 1579-A CertImates of 0511patl0n 12.07.77 0.01.37 7 Us 73,000 '175.000 0 11 ,IS6 11,656
Utelrll Fire Sta-lurl
1560 Certificates e.' 0011qattar 4-IS 07 4.15-PS 9.90 to I1 Al ,250,000 750,000 0 25,000 75,001,
Ill61q,) C.panslnnl
1110 tlertrlc Pllllly lint parr 5-m 10 5-01.15 10.00 x)0,000 62,150 62,150 6,116 H,07f
(leap 261 Mlntnlro71
19M) feM-al 1L11041bo 115-01 1-15-03 1,711 t0 `).00 1,74!,00 5. 6, Ow 27!.00 311,950 127,950
ISlreel, Drl'ne9e, ILe SVtlOnl
1910 Certificates )1 (51190101 1 IS 14 "5181 6,00 m k)O 54.7,000 0 66 am
-_a-d Om
{I6, IDl~1S0 1 1,277 ! 11016.157 i fa1}Isk)
8 - 0
,
a I
I
c>
•
EM(,'f OF IIdCR HWAI. MUSE IN ITS FROMM TAR RATE
A4SSLSSED MPiX'IY Tax Increase for One (1) Year
VALLE ^ $V01 $_05 $`.10 3`15 $ .20
1. $150,000 $15 315 $150 $225 $300
2. $Iou,OOO $IU $5U $IUU $150 $200
3. $ 50,000 $5 $25 $50 $75 3100
•
JFMc:ab
1324F
s
c+
•
I
i
I
I
i
1
1
EFFECT OF DXR04WAL R RMSE IN nlE FROMTY TAX RATE
ASSESSED PROPERTY Tax Increase for one (1) Year
VAllTc '
$----Ul $_-05 $`lp $i15 3,20
1. $1.~O,OW $15 $75 $150 $125 $300
2. $100,000 $10 $50 $loo $150 $200
3. $ 50,000 $5 $25 $5U $75 smi
•
O • 0
JETtc:eb
1314E'
J
S.
•
•
•
{
IM llkXME kUlt $20,00,00() 8CVD SALE
ows r (AsC swmio)
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990
MACE Al'I'ti: PAM U
Rl'. lX1K};vr hil i stxvlcs 111: $U $ s1/,9W $ 692,000 $1,U21,000 $1,50U,90U $1,916,440
j_"1,UUU,(W
AAl"UU, I)Ldl' AutVit;E: $U I,gw,uuu 2,650,000 2075(),000 2,650,000 2,550,000
rN, KtA,JLSt7)
I'li, $1UU Uk
ii.6L W VAIIIArlai: $ u $.2984 $.1613 $.1176
$.9112 $.0357
l I J Assin~~ d 9.tS1>l, Sruw[II li,~~tur.
O
s •
Jr. k 6:,.d,
1 I~4F
r.
--....~~~.r~.,+. • . r~.~.r near ,r,~.._
i
•
C)
O
r '
x
t
=10,000,000
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
PROPOSED GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
SERIES 1985
DATED: May 1, ;965 FIRST CPN DUE: 5/1/86
PRINCIPAL DUE: 5/1 INTEREST DUE: 5/1 11/1
YEAR
END CURRENT THIS 310 000 000 ISSUE GRAND TOTAL
9/30 REQUIREMENTS 1UTAL REQUIREl4ENf5
1985 $ 2,318,907 $ O $ 0 S 0 3 2,318,907
1986 2,158,025 500,000 1,475,000 1,975,000 4,133,025
1987 1,027,851 5UO,000 925,W0 1,425,000 3,452,857
1988 1,967,90o 5OU,U0 815,09 1,375,000 3,342,906
1989 2,333,1c2 500,OUO 825,000 ;,325,000 3,058,322
1990 1,642,145 500,000 715,000 1,275,000 2,917,14S
1991 1,5bb,813 500,000 125,000 11225,000 2,791,613
1992 1,482,269 500,000 675,000 1,176,000 2,651,169
1993 1,421,719 500,000 625,000 1,125,000 2,546,719
1994 1,389,062 500,000 575,010 1,015,000 2,464,062
1995 1,224,283 SOO,OU4 525,000 1,025,000 2,249,181
1996 1,165,256 500,000 415,000 975,0011 2,140,256
1997 981,b88 500,000 415,000 925,000 11907,Ld6
1998 632,938 500,000 375,000 d75,000 1,601,938
1999 597,626 500,000 525,000 825,000 1,422,626
2000 562,126 500,000 276,000 775,000 1,337,126
2001 307,811 500,000 225,000 115,000 1,032,813
2002 284,688 500,000 175,000 675,000 959,686
1003 201,561 500,000 125,000 625,000 880,563
2004 U 500,000 75,000 575,OOU 575,000
1005 _0 500,000 _ 250000 525,00 _ 525,000 j
324,527,OUo $10,000,000 $10,500,000 320,500,000 $44,827,006
INTEREST CALCULATED AT IU.OY FOR PURPOSES OF ILLIISTRATION.
O 1984/85 Triable Assessed Valuation $1,154,036,258 • •
Average Annual Requirements, 1986/2005:
New Debt $1,025,000
JFMcG:ab
1358F
0032E
O 0
e
e~
0
BOND SALE REQUIREMENTS (310,000,000)
YEAR
END BEGINNING INTEREST* $.02 FROM TAX ENUINC
9/30 SERVICE BALANCE EARNINGS OPERATIONS COLLECTIONS BALANCE
1985 $2,318,907 $285,826 $502,000 SY13,000 $2,253,063 $934,982
1986 4,133,025 934,982 550,000 243,000 2,475,942 70,699
1987 3,452,857 70,899 395,000 267,000 2,720,441 483
1968 3,342,906 483 200,000 293,000 2,989,085 139,662
1989 3,0d,31c i39,697 1U5,000 323,000 3,284,257 193,597
1990 2,917,145 0 0 - -
1991 2,791,813 - 0 0
1392 2,657,269 - 0 O
1993 2,546,719 - 0 0
1994 2,464,062 0 0 -
1995 2,249,283 0 0 -
" Earnings are based Ln a five-year program witn a $2,000,OUO projected
yearly expenditure.
ADDITIONAL TA-Y INFORMATION
DEBT SERVICE
YIELD FROM FOR EVERY
TAX INCREASES $1,000,000 OF
DEBT ISSUED
e YEAR ANNUAL
$.01 3,02 RE UIREMFNT
1985 $106,500 $213,000
$ 0
1986 111,500 243,000 197,500
1987 133,500 267,000 142,500
e 1988 146,500 293,500 137,500 e
1989 161,500 323,000 132,500
JFMcG:cD
1361E
D032F
417 ,
•
it
j {
r
1
I
s
I
li
i
GROUP 1 BOND ISSUE STREET DATA
i
REBUILD COSTS RANK
Hillcrest 47,018 1
West Oak (Bonnie Brae to Jagoe) 201,583 I
Bonnie Brae (Riney to Windsor) 397,876 1
Bonnie Brae (Windsor to Univ.) 301,557 1
Bonnie Brae (Univ. to Scripture) 899,984 1
Scripture 135 to Bonnie Brne) 347,907 1
West Oak (135 to Y) 207,876 1
TOTAL COST FOR RANK 11 $2,403,801.00
Sctipture (Thomas to Jagoe) 11,600 2
Masch Branch 81,200 2
TOTAL COST FOR RANK 02 $92,800.00
Bellmead
11,556 3
Thomas 413,225 3
Marshall 330,646 3
Mesa 23,200
3
• • d
TOTAL COST FOR RANK /3 $7780627.00
,,yy~~,?1~,ti~'..,``M ~'r A,y*ya
v7
i r r. argil,
Q
w
Group ]-Bond Issue Street Data
Page 2
January 22, 1985
Stanley 28,889 4
TOTAL COST FOR RANK 14 $28,889.00
Linden 20,300 5
Emery 20,300 5
Greenway 19,265 5
Thunderbird 19,800 S
Payne 196,517 S
Hampton 462,964 S
Cindy 251,097 5
Los Colinas 3,853 S
Colonial 80667 5
Brook Hollow 99,815 5
Cordell S,800 S
Lariat 32,670 ;
TOTAL COST FOR RANK /5 $1,741,OS8.00
2092M
~ . r~ _ rC~iLt"Y.~ ~fr» i ii 1~ t 1•.
•1' r S~NtytiP,~f~~,`~f~+t r~1 a(Y..s{~y1}f`~+t~.~1~'
i
e
i 48
i
I
.~T
STREET STUDY.
QUADRANT 2
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total 156
Street Name Quid. No. From To~ 411e1Class Costs Costs Quality Points Eng. and Cant.
Welch 2 Hickory ask 0.10 R30C 5,001 - 40 12114/84
Mulberry 2 Elm Bernard 0.40 C36C 24,654 2 40 12112184
Bradley 2 Sena Oak 0.25 R25C 10,107 1 40
Yellowstone 2 Sun Valley Rings Row 0.30 934C 11,334 - 2 41 11/16/84
Mounts 2 Congress Oak 0,30 R34C 11,334 2 41 12107/84
Colt 2 Westway Congress 0.70 R34C 40,445 - 2 41
Coronado 2 locust Bell 0,30 C34C 17,334 3 43 11/28/84
Scripture 2 3agoe Bryan 0.20 C3DC 10,013 2 44 12105/84
Georgetown 2 bowling Green University 0,70 R30C 35,047 - 2 44 11/28/84
•
Avenue C 2 Mulberry Oak 0.20 R46.50 15,798 2 44 12/12/84
Alice 2 Congress [gar 0.10 030C 5,001 0 44
Bolivar 2 Congress University 0.80 C30C 40,054 - 4 44
• Crescent 2 Malone Bolivar 0.90 RUC 69,353 - 1 44 e
Kings Raw 2 Stuart Sherman 0.70 C30C 40,445 1 44 11/08/83
MdnSattan 2 Sherman Stuart 0.30 134C 17,334 ! 44
Anwrlllo 2 Gregg Panhand7elIDO' 0.40 R34C 23,112 1 45
0977p
i
i
'Y
it
•
•
t
f
•
Street Study
Quadrant 2
Page Two
Boundaries Length Street Drafnage Riding Distress Total a 15S
Street Wan Quid. No, From To Mlles Class Costs Costs Quality Points En9, and Cont.
Avenue B 2 Oak Mfckory 0.05 A40C 3,467 1 45
Faileeadow 2 Hwy. 77 6ardenvlew 0,30 R34C 17,334 1 46 11/28/84
ETa 2 Prairie Highland 0,10 A45C 7,899 2 46
Egan 2 Malone Bolivar 0.80 R34C 46,223 - 1 46
Linden 1,2 Malone Bonnie Brae 0,35 C44C 46,235 - 2 46 12/07/84
0,25
Emery 1,2 Bonnie Brae Malone 0.35 A34C 34,667 - 1 46 12/07/84
T.
Magnolia 2 New Asphalt HInk Te 0,25 R34C 14,445 47
Atlas 2 Redstons Hercules 0,30 A34C 17,334 - 2 49 11/16/81
Ectoe 2 Scripture University 0.80 C4r✓ 55,478 2 49 12/05/84
Alice 2 Egan University 0.14 R34C 43,334 2 49
Dover 2 Sherman Avon 0.15 114 C 71,659 - 1 49 11/08/83
Anna 2 Panhandle Universfty 0,60 R34C 34,667 2 50 12/01/84
O ETm 2 Congress Oak 0,30 ASDC 26,188 2 50 0
Headlee 2 Hinkle Bolivar 0150 R34C 28,889 2 51 11/28/84
Sunset 2 Anna University 0,35 R34C 20,223 1 61
Scripture 1,2 Thomas 74 goo 0.50 C30C 11,600 2 ST 12/05/81
13,433
0
i
i
i ~
i
i
i
Street Study
Quadrant 2
Page Three
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total + 1SS
Street Name Quid. No, From _ To Mlles Class Costs Cgst1. 9ua1fty Points Eng,_ and Cont,
Gofer 2 Cordell Scripture 0.60 A34C 34,667 - 2 52 12/05/84
Stuart 2 Kings Row Coronado 0.60 C34C 34,667 52
Hfghland 2 Elm Welch 0.60 030C 30,040 - 2 54
Sycamore 2,3 Welch sell 0,60 C3OC 25,x037 - 1 54 12114/84
0,30 20,030
Sena 2 Malone Ettor 0,3S R34C 20,223 2 95 12/07/84
Elm 2 Mulberry Prairie 0.20 A45C 15,798 2 55
Hercules 2 Picedilly Sheraton 0,30 C34C 11,334 1 SS
Bryn Mawr 2 Nfnkle Amherst 0.20 034C 11,616 - 2 56 11128/84
Denton 2 Crescent Hickory 0.15 A34C 4,350 - 1 %
Y Mimosa 2 BOTIVAr Hinkle 0,55 A34C 31,944 - 2 56
Pander 2 Oak linden 8100' 0.50 Utc 29,040 1 56
Carroll 2 Northridge Ross 0,50 A36C 29,040 2 57 11/28/84
Denison 2 Sherman Headlee 0.40 A34C 23,232 69 e
6 '
Normal 2 Oak Scripture 0,15 434C 6,712 - 2 59
Denison 2 Sherman Unfrerslty U.10 A34C 5,808 2 60
Emery 2 Fulton 4200' Carroll 0,35 A34C 20,328 - 2 60
Scripture 2 Bryan Ponder 0.10 coos 7,234 2 61 12/05/84
5
r
r
e
Street Study
Quadrant 2
a
P-;a Four '
~a
k
Boundaries _ length Street Or& nage Riding Distress Total s 15%
Street Name Quad. No. From Te Miles Clars Costs Costs Quality Points Ell. and Cont.
Fry 2 Oak Hickory 0.10 R34C 5,808 61
i
Oak 2 Austin Bolivar 0.20 ASOC 17,424 2 61
Ccrdell 1,2 Hillcrest Malone 0_10 k44C 7,920 - 2 61 12/OS/84
0.30 23,160
Hercules 2 Redstone Stuart 0.25 C60C 26,400 - 1 62
Stuart 2 Hercules Kings Row 0.40 C34C 23,112 66
Cedar 2 Mulberry McKinney 0.20 R34C 11,616 2 68
Westway 2 Bolivar Fulton 0.45 R34C 26,136 - 2 69
Congress 2,3 Oakland Ponder- 0.76 C34C 31.944 2 69
0.20 23,232
0 Oak 2 Bolivar Jigoa 1.00 A36C 336,334 91,800 2 70 451,440
Pearl 2 Denton Carroll 0.10 R34C 39,781 0 1 70 45,749
Lovell 2 Scripture Egan 0.10 R34C 43,398 0 2 11 49,908
West Oak l,t Bonnie Brae Jagoe 0.45 A36C t21,79S &91-4 2 11 321,295
p 0.25 15,536 0
Hickory 1,2 Avenue C Bonnie Brae 0.40 A45C 323,895 2 72 372,419
1.30
Hickory 2 Avenue C Welch 0.40 A36C 148,263 26,125 3 72 200,547
Ragnolia 2 New Asphalt Bolivar 0.30 R34C 108,495 45,410 3 74 176,991
• Q `j' i c. k iGR4"f'.,i c .'eC~,'; t :F a'air.i .
lr w ~r ,r ~~~'K@y t]
%
• I
A I
® i
T
i
. r
;MCI
Street Study
Quadrant I
Page Five
I
i
Street time uad. No. Froe Boundaries
To length Street Drainage Aldine Distress Total ♦ 155
M11es Clssf Costs, Cosh ualt P~Ints (Mg. and Cont,
Hickory 2,7 Cedar Austle
0_OS A67C 101,645 2 '11
0,15 116,950
lollvar 2 Northridge JnlrersltY 0,10 A3/C 260,388 149,712
2 16 111,615
Fry 2 Scripture Oak 0,20 1310 77,155
21,150 2 TB IN,740
Stuart 2 Selene Hercules 0,30
101,411 0 T8 123,595
Hickory 2 Carroll Cedar
0.10 A36C 77 ttl 18,160 2 79
Welch 105,045
2 Mulberry Hickory 0,10 270 31,066 15,625
Avenue C 74 53,694
2,4 I8-35 Mulberry 0.70 C55C 119,347
0.40 3- 2 85 556,741
Pershing 2 Stuart Atlas
0.20 134C 66,713 0 1 v
97 79,020
•
1
O ~
,J
4. a
• f~.,Y",r 1b1
va
•
-
•
LAU
STREET STUDY
QUADWT 4
Boundaries Length Street Orainage Aiding Distress Total 155
Street None Quad. Na From To Miles Class Costs Costs Quality, Points Eng. and Cont.
Central 4 Eagle Highland OAS R34C 8.667 - 1 40 12/12/04
Dudley 4 McCormick Jacqueline 0.10 R14C 5,778 1 40 12/14/84
Oakwood 4 Mercedes Cul de sac 0.10 R34C 5,778 2 40 12/14164
McCormick 4 Wlllowood IR-35 0,65 R34C 37,556 2 40 12/14/84
Wisteria 4 Willowwood Golf 0.10 034C 5,718 2 40 12/14/84
Chasevood 4 Pe4rooke WoodDrook 0.10 R34C 5,178 1 40
Rmdolph 4 Willowwood IH-35 0,50 R34C 28,890 2 41 12/14/84
Collier 4 IH-35 Eagle 0.30 R34C 17,334 1 41 12/12/84
Savannah 4 Teasley Looprldge 0.40 A34C 23,112 2 43 12/28/84
•
Welch 4 Eagle Highland 0.15 C4DC 10,402 2 43 12/12/84
WoodDrook 4 Pennsylvania IN-35 0.80 R44C 61,647 2 44 12/28/84
Willowood 4 Mctorelck Bernard 0.30 C22S 10,393 3 44 12/14/84
A Travers 4 Hopktns Drive Piping Rock 0.05 R34C 2,889 1 44 10/11183 •
Willowwood 4 Bonnie Brae Highland Park 0.40 USS 16,179 2 /S 12/14/84
Westwood 4 P4rvin Willowwood 0.35 134C 20,223 1 45
Aldgeceest 4 Pennsylvania Aldgecrest 1.80 A34C 104,002 2 46 12/28/84
D913g
• Q I! t Y
I
%
Ir
• 1
C)
a
• i
i
1
i
i
I
1
Street Study
Quadrant 4 "
Page Two
Boundaries Length Street Drainagr. Riding Distress Total a 15%
Street Hame Quad. No. From To Miles Class Costs Costs Quality Points Erte. and Cont. 3
I
Myrtle 4 Daugherty Collins 0.25 R34C 14,445 - 2 41
I
Jacqueline 4 Parvin Villowood 0.40 R34C 23,112 - 1 49 12/14/84
Mccormick 4 Parvin H111owood 0,30 R34C 17,334 2 49 12/14184 I
Hollyhtll 4 Ridgecrest Tennyson 1.10 R34C 63,551 2 SI 12/28/84
Milshlre 4 Avenue C Avenue D 0.10 R34S 5,778 - 2 54 12/12/84
Avenue 0 4 Mlghland I4-35 0.25 R34C 14,445 - 2 54
Avenue B 4 Maple Underwood 0.30 03DC 03.020 - 2 55
Camden Ct. 4 Londonderry cul de sec 0.05 R34C 2,889 2 55
Willow Springs 4 Shady Oaks Kerley 0.20 C34C 11,556 2 55
Hobson Lane 4 Teasley FM-1830 III; c2SS 50,094 2 $6
Locust 3,4 Eagle Mulberry 0120 AS4C 19.166 - 2 67
0.30 28,750
S. Locust 4 IM 3S Eagle 0.0 R255 4,355 3 60
Pembrooke 4 Longridge Fairfax 0.65 434C 37,752 3 62 12/28184
• Bernard 4 Willowwood IM-35 0.10 036C 5,808 3 6S
Bernard 4 Hickory Eagle 0.60 A30C 31,680 2 68
Prairie 4 Avenue E Bonnie Brae 0.45 R34C 139,235 0 2 73 160,120
Avenue A 4 Highland McCormick O.SS R34C 182,633 0 2 7s 210,028
•
4a
•
•
,-.n,,, v....:r. ~terry r..,r.•.'r' . r...... h.
.
Y
' e
1
Street Study
Quadrant 4
Page Three
_ Boundarles Length Street Drainage AI ding Distress Total f 155
Street Name Quad. No. From To Mlles Class Costs COStf u311tj Points Eno. and Cont.
Bonnie Brae 4 FM 1515 Santa Fe Tracks 0.80 US$ 338,611 13,335 3 15 416,045
Kingswood 4 Londonderry Cul de sec 0.05 R34C 18,082 0 2 15 20,794
Maple 4 Avenue D Bernard 0.70 034C 251,346 0 2 81 289,048
Rosel W 4 Ft. North Dr, City Omits 1.35 R2SS 601, 669 131,398 2 85 849,928
Elm 4 Highland Eagle 0.15 A416 93,242 180,250 85 314,516
S. Locust 4 South End IH 35 0,20 025S 65,290 0 2 86 15,083
Spencer 4 Woodrow Loop 288 1.40 A25S 512,502 206,850 2 92 896,253
Acme 4 Bernard S. Locust 0.25 025S 61,612 25,000 2 94 122,604
Avenue E 4 IN 35 Eagle 0.05 C34C 36,806 0 2 102 42,321
100E 4 Eagle Highland 0.15 R25S 83,161 0 3 110 96,326
James 4 Massey Ft. North Dr. 0.70 A25S 241,513 68,395 4 125 344,963
I~
•
4a
•
a
STREET STUDY RANKING
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress 'I Total 158
A~j Street Name Quad. No, From To (Mlles Cl1si Colts Costs Que1f~ Points r [Mg, and Cont.
1 M111cnst I Sr 'pture Emery 0,65 A40C 47,016 - 2 60 12/05/84
1 Avenue C 2 Mulberry Oak 0,20 846.50 15,798 2 44 12/12/84
1 1a 11var 2 Congress University 0,60 C30C 40,054 4 44
1 Kings Row 2 Stuart Sherman 0.70 C30C 40,445 1 44 11/DB/83
1 Elm 2 Prairia Highland 0.10 A45C 7,e99 2 46
1 Magnolia 2 New Asphalt Hirkle O,2S A34C 14,445 47
1 Elm 2 Congress Oak 0.30 ASOC 26 S88 2 50
I Stuart 2 Kings Row Coronado 0 60 C34C 34,667 62
1 110 2 Mulberry prairie 0.20 A45C 15,798 2 65
• I Nercules 2 Pludllly Sheraton 0.30 C34C 17,334 1 65
1 Carroll 2 Northridge Pass 0.50 A36C 29,040 2 67 11128164
1 Oak 2 Austin Bolivar 0,20 ASOC 17,424 2 61
1 Hercules 2 Redstone Atvart 0.26 C60C 26,400 - 1 62
• I Stuart 2 hfrcules Kings Row 0,40 C34C 2J,112
66
I Locust 3 Hickory Oak DIOS A63C 5,628 2 42
1 Withers 3 Oakland Mingo 0,30 A34C 17,334 1 43
I Robinwuod 3 Emerson University 0.60 A34C 34,668 2 44 It/02/64
- . ..L..~.r...WreiT'rr R,..._. nti. Yi;.;~a+¢ tlt L'- \~~~wi .~rr~y.~~r~i
• ~ Y ~7
i
1
S
i
I '
.
Street Study Ranking n
Page 2
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total • 156
Rork Street Now Quid. No. From To Mlles Class Costs Costs Qualftl Points N. and Cont.
1 Paisley 3 Woodford Mettle 0.20 C24$ 0,085 3 45 tl/01/84
1 Locust 3 Oak McKinney 0.05 ASOC 4,431 3 46
1 Paisley 3 Frame Ruddell 0.40 C225 13,651 2 46 11/01/84
1 First 3 Bolivar Locust 0.15 034C 8,867 - 1 46
1 Greenwood 3 laurel Wood Cherrywood 0.70 R34C 40,445 2 47
1 Kings Row 3 Sherman Yorkshire 0.30 C44C 23,118 49 11/06/83 1
1 MockingbfrJ 3 McKinney Oriole 1D0' 6.50 034C 28,889 1 61
YI
1 locust 3 McKinney Congress 0.20 AISC 15.798 2 51
35
1 Emerson 3 Freedom WIIsonwood 1.50 134C 86,669 2 St 1110084
I Austin 3 McKinney Mulberry 0.15 134C 8,666 2 53
•
1 Audra 3 McKinney End of Divide 0.30 CS5C 29,480 1 54
1 Locust 3 Mulberry Hickory 0.05 ASOC 6,628 2 65
1 Mingo 3 Withers Mockingbird 2.20 R30S 116,160 2 58
Q 1 Old North Road 3 University Mill Pond 0.35 C44C 27,720 1 69 72/20183 1
1 Frame 3 RRK S. McKinney 0.30 134C 17,424 - 2 61
1 Nottingham 3 University Windsor 0.60 A40C 57,869 - 2 62 '
1„.
i Greenwood 3 Cherrywoad Sherman 0..0 R34C 11,616 - 2 64 r
I Locust 3 University Sterean Dr. 0.10 A34C 6,662 2 64 p'
_ t l dT', w c t ;;x r'G t s ~
t R a I~
•
ca
e
0
e
Street Study Ranking
Page 3 4.
t:
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total r 151 1
Rank Street Nao! Quad. No. From To~ IN11ea Claw Costs Costs Quality Points Eng. and Cont.
1 110 3 University Congress 0.70 A45C 55,440 2 66
1 Paisley 3 Hettie Auddel1 0.10 C-45 4,356 2 66 11/01184
I
1 Pertain 3 Ntngo Wayne 0.10 R25S 4,356 2 66 11101104
1 Mctonslck 4 Parvin WiI1^wwood 0.30 134C 17,334 - 2 49 tt/14/64
I HollyhI11 4 Aidgecrest Tennyson 1.10 034C 63,557 - 2 $1 12128/84
1 Avenue D 4 Highlanr IH-35 0.25 A34C 14,445 2 54
1 Hobson Lim 4 Teasley FN-1830 1.15 C25S 50,094 2 S6
I Bonnie Brae 1 Riney Windsor 0.65 C25,t 345,979 0 3 75 397,676
1 Bonnie Brae 1 Windsor Univtrsity 0.70 C25S 247,824 14,400 3 71 301,657
1 Bonnie Brae I University :,crtpture 0.75 C45S 372,970 409,625 3 90 899,981
1 Scripture I IH-35 Bonnie Brae 0.50 C22S 226,338 76,190 3 99 347,907
1 West Oak 1 IH-35 T 0.30 AM 156.512 24,250 4 114 207,876
1 Hickory 1,2 Aven.n, C Bonnie Brae 0.40 A45C 323,895 2 72 372,4?k
1.30
1 Oak 2 Bolivar Jagoe 1.00 AM 336,334 91,800 2 70 461,440 0
1 Hickory 2 Avenue C Welch 0.40 A36C 148,263 26,125 3 12 200,547
1 Nagnol U 2 %04 Asphalt Bolivar 0.30 034C 108,495 45,410 2 74 176,991
7 Bolivar 2 Northridge lnlversity 0.70 A34C 260,386 149.112 1 76 471,615
1 Fry 2 Scripture Ork 0.20 934C 77,755 21,150 2 78 113,740
•
0
Street Study Ranking
Page 4
Boundaries Length Street Drainage AE41119 Distress Total ♦ 1S%
Rank Street WaaK (Zyad. No. From
To AE Class costs costs uali Points Eng. and Cont.
I Stuart 2 Selene Hercules 0,30 107,474 t, 78 123,595
1 Hickory 2 Carroll Cedar Olio A36C 73,227 18,160 2 19 105,045
1 Welch 2 Mulberry Hickory 0.10 27a 31,066 15,625 79 53,694
1 Pershing 2 Stuart Atlas 0.20 R34C 68,713 0 1 97 79,020
1 Avenue C 2,4 IN-35 Mulberry 0.30 CSSC 419,347 27y775 2 85 556,781
0.40 37,035
1 Locust 3 Sherman Orr 0,55 A34Y 306,718 104,775 3
79 413,218
1 A64ra 3 End of Divide Paisley 1,00 ( 83
1 Glenwood 3 Windsor University 0,70 R34C 264,004 13,160 ' 2 BS 387,739
1 Avenue A 4 Highland McCormick O,SS 134C 182,633 0 2 7S
210.028
1 AC me 4 Bernard Fort North Dr. 0.26 R255 81,612 25,000 t 94 61 302
r
• 1 Elm 4 Highland Eagle 0.15 A41C 13,242 180,250 5 85 314.616
2 Masch Branch I University JIM Christal 0.75 A22W -81,200
2 Mulberry 2 Elm Bernard 0.40 C36C 24,654 - 2 40 12/12/84
2 Alice 2 Congress Egen 0.10 R30C 5,007 0 44
s -
2 Alice 2 Egan University 0,75 R34C 43,334 2 49
2 Scripture 2 Bryan Ponder 0,10 C40S 7,234 - t 61 11/05/84
2 Fry 2 Oak Hickory 0,10 R34C 6,808 61
2 third 3 Bolivar Locust 0,30 R25C 15,020 1 41
{
OMENS
•
b
0
e"
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
Street Study Ranking
Page 5
?k ,
I
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total + 151
Rank Street Name Quid. No. From -To (miles) Class Costs Costs sli Points Eny. Ind Cont.
i
2 Churchill 3 Burn Tree Nottingham 0.10 R34C 5,778 44 11/29/83
2 Hanover 3 Windsor Emerson 0.25 934C 14,445 - 1 45 12120183
2 industrial 3 Hickory sell 0.20 04DC 13,669 - 1 45
2 Forcroft 3 Emerson Emerson 0.70 034C 40,445 - 1 41 11/02/84
2 Churchill 3 Windsor Nottingham 0.35 R34C 20,223 - 1 52 11/29/83
2 Mlstywood 3 Vottingham Woodhaven 0.45 R44C 34,676 2 65
2 Archer Trill 3 Emerson Emerson 0.45 A34C 26,136 - 1 56 12/20/83
2 Cardinal 3 McKinney End 0 65 134C 37,752 3 60 11102184
2 Walnut 3 Austfn Cedar 0.10 A34C S,BCB - 2 60
2 Linwood 3 Sherman Crestwood 0.25 R34C 14,520 - 2 64
O 2 , , 4 Eagle Highland 0.15 R34C 8,667 - 1 40 12/12/84
2 Dudley 4 McCormick Jacqueline D.10 A34C 5,118 - 1 40 12/14/84
2 Oakwood 4 Mercedes Cut de sac 0.10 R34C 5,778 2 40 12/14/84
2 McCormick 4 W111owwood IH•36 0.65 A34C 37,556 2 40 12/14/84
O •
2 Wisteria 4 WIIIowwood Golf 0.10 034C 5,778 2 40 12/14/84
2 Chasewood 4 Perorooke WoodErook 0.10 034C 5,778 - 1 40
2 Kendolph 4 Willowwood IN-35 0.50 R34C 28,690 2 41 12/14/84
2 Collier 4 IH-35 Eagle 0.30 A34C 17,334 - 1 41 12/12/84
Q
0
Street Study Ranking
Page 6
Boundaries length Street Drainage Rlding Distress Total + 159
Rank Street Name quid. No. From To Milea Class Costs Costs Quality Points Eno- and Cont.
2 Savannah 4 Teasley longrfdge 0.40 A34C 23,112 - 2 43 12/28/84
2 Welch 4 Cagle Highland 0.15 C40C 10,402 - 2 43 12/12184
2 Woodbroak 4 Pennsylvania EH-35 0.80 R44C 61,647 - 2 44 12/28/64
2 Wlllowwood 4 McCormick Bernard 0.30 C22S 10,393 3 44 12/14/84
2 Travers 4 Hopkins Drive Piping Rock D.OS 134C 2,889 1 44 10/11/83
2 Wlllcwood 4 8onnle Brae Highland Park 0.40 ass 16,170 - 2 45 12/14/84
2 Westwood 4 Parvin Willowxood 0.35 034C 20,223 1 45
2 Aidgecrest 4 Pennsylvania Ridgecrest 1.80 134C 704,002 2 46 12/28/84
2 Myrtle 4 Daugherty 011ins 0.25 0340 14,445 - 2 47
2 Jacqueline 4 Parvin Willowoad 0.40 A34C 23,112 - l 49 12/14/84
2 Wilshire 4 Avenue C Avenue 0 0.10 R343 5,776 2 64 12112184
2 Willow Springs 4 Shady Oaks Kerley 0.20 C34C 11,556 - 2 55
I
2 Pembrooke 4 longridge Falrfaa 0.65 A34C 37,752 - 3 62 12j28/8/
2 Bernard 4 Hickory Eagle 0.60 A30C 31,680 2 68
2 bell 3 Unlversfty Shersaan 0.30 C31ca 75,083 0 3 BO 86,346 O 11
1 r
2 Hickory 3 Austin AR 0.00 ASSC 182,325 81,450 2 91 310,211
3 Bellnead I Emery Thow 0.20 134C 11,656 3 49 12/05/84
3 Mesa 1 Barcelona University 0135 A34C 20,400
7
,5 1
A
C
•
r
Street Study Ranking
Page 7
.n
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding 011tress Total a 1St
Rink Street Nave Quad. No. From To (Miles) Cim Costs Costs Quality Points End and Cont.
3 Welch 2 Hickory Oak 0.10 A30C 5,007 40 12/14/64
3 Yellowstone 2 Sun Valley Rings Row 0.30 R34C 17,334 - 2 41 11116164
3 Coronado 2 locust Bell 0.30 C34C 17,334 3 43 11/28/84
3 Scripture 2 Jagoe Br/an 0.20 C3DC 10,013 - 2 44 12/05/64
3 Georgetown 2 Bowling Green University 0.70 R30C 35,047 2 44 11/28/84
3 Crescent 2 Malone Bolivar 0.90 R44C 69,353 - 1 44
I
3 Ector 2 Scripture University 0.60 C40C $5,476 - 2 49, 12105184
i
3 Dover 3 Sherman Avon 0.15 R44C 11,559 1 49 11/08/83
3 Heidlee 2 Hinkle Bolivar 0.50 R34C 28,889 2 51 11128184
3 Denison 2 Sherman University 0.70 R34C 5,808 - 2 60
• 3 Westway 2 Bolivar Fulton 0.45 R34C 26,136 - ; 69
3 Royal lane 3 Mistywood Rockwood 0.20 R44C 15,412 - 1 44 11/09/64
3 Avon 3 Stratford Neither 0.15 034C 8,657 - 2 44 11108183
3 Dunes 3 Windsor Old Orchard Rd 0.25 R34C 14,445 - 1 44 7t/29183
• 3 W111fimshurg 3 Nottingham Jamestown 0.20 R34C 11,556 - 2 4'
3 Oak 3 RR Austin 0.30 ASSC 26,480 2 52
3 laurelwood 3 Kayewood University 0.45 R34C 25,136 2 68
3 Keyewood 3 Crestwood Greenwood 0.55 934C 31,944 - ; 62
i
•
ea
•
Street Study Ranking
Page 8
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Total a 15%
Rank Street Name Quid. No. from _ To (Miles) Cuss Costs Costs Quality PofntjEng. and Cont. r
3 Rockwood 3 Emerson Laurelwood 0.30 A34C 17,424 1 64 11/02184
3 Neither 3 Stratford Oxford 0.40 A34C 23,232 - 2 65 11/16/84
3 Locks7ey 3 Emerson Nottingham 0.25 A34C 14,520 - 1 67 12/20/83
3 Wood 3 McKinney Texas 0.50 R34C 29,040 - 2 67
3 Bernard 4 WfIIo.rood IN-35 0,10 A36C 6,808 - 3 65
3 Thomas 1 Oat Emery 0.85 134C 329,101 30,225 2 73 413,225
3 Marshall 1 Hwy. 380 Harwton 0.60 A2SS 266,280 21,238 2 76 330,646
3 Pearl 2 Denton Carroll 0.10 R34C 39,781 0 1 70 45,749
3 Mlstywood 3 Woodhaven Robinwood 0.20 144C 107,965 117,000 2 70 258,709
3 Oriole 3 Mockingbird Cardinal 0.35 034C 94,029 0 3 145 108,131
3 locust 3 Congress University 0,70 A31C 404,776- - 183,260 -,92-_682,095-
. !r
3 Maple 4 Avenue D Bernard 0.70 A34C 251,346• '0 2 83 289,048
4 Stanley 1 Emery Panhandle O.SO 034C 28,889 1 55
4 Colt 2 Westway Congress 0.70 R34C 40,445 - 2 41
• 4 Manhattan 2 Sherman Stuart 0,30 R34C 11,334 2 44 0
4 Avenue 8 2 Oak Hickory 0,05 1400 3,467 - 1 45
4 Atlas 2 Redstone Hercules 0,30 AMC 17,334 2 49 11/16/b4
4 Gober 2 Cordell Scripture 0.60 034C 34,661 2 62 12/05/84
t
•
1 4Ll
e
•
Street Study Ranking
Page 9
Boundarfes Length Street Drainage Rfdfng Distress Total 1S9
Rana street New Quid. No. From To Miles Class Costs Costs Quality Points Eng. and Cont.
4 Sena 2 Malone Ector 0 35 R34; 20,223 - 2 SS 12/07184
4 Denton 2 Crescent Hfckory 0.75 934C 4,350 1 56
4 Mimosa 2 Bolivar Hinkle 0,55 R34C 31,944 2 56
4 Denison 2 Sherman Heodlee 0.40 134C 23,232 S?
4 Emery 2 Fulton 3200' Carroll 0.35 R34C 20,328 - 2 60
4 A u t t f n 3 Oakland Parkway 0.70 R25C 28,299 - 1 44
4 Frame 3 RR Tracks Grove 0,25 034C 14,445 - 1 44
4 Palmwood 3 Glenwood Kayewood 0.05 R34C 2,889 - 1 46 11/02/84
4 Campbell 3 McKinney Paisley OAS 034C 20,223 - 1 45 11/01/84
4 Pecan 3 Cedar Austfn 0,10 R,OC 6,935 2 45
• 4 Bradshaw 3 Paisley McKinney 0.30 034C 17,334 1 16
4 Lire Oak 3 Sherman Robinwood 0.20 R34C 11,656 2 48 11/16/84
4 Third 3 Locust Oakland 0.20 30C 10,013 48
4 Crawford 3 Texas McKinney 0.30 134C 17,424 - 2 64
e 4 Woodland 3 Cherrywood Shervan 0.50 134C 29,040 - 2 69 •
4 venue B 4 Map?* Underwood 0.30 R30C 15,020 2 65
4 Camden Ct. 4 Londonderry Cut de tae 0.05 A34C 2,889 2 66
4 So. Locust 4 iH 35 Eagle 0.10 125S 4,356 3 60
. S
• O 1~
O
Q
r
e
Street Study Ranking
Page 10
I
boundaries _ Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Total a 1St
Pink Street Name Quad. No. From To {Mlles Class costs Costs ualit Points Eno. and Cont.
4 Cherrywood 3 Greenwood Woodland 0.20 R34C 75,946 0 2 77 87,338
4 Woodhaven 3 Mlstywood Emerson 0.30 A34C 83,179 0 2 77 95,656
4 Rose 3 Paisley Texas 0.15 A2SS 37,014 0 2 89 42,572
r,
4 tingswood 4 Londonderry Cul de sac 0.05 4340 18,002 0 2 75 20,794
5 Los Colinas I Mesa IN-3S 0.05 R44C 3,853 1 46 02/21/84
5 Colonial 1 Augusta Thunderbird O.1S A34C 8,661 1 46
5 Greenwsy 1 Augusta Brookhullow 0.25 R44C 19,265 1 51 02/27/84
5 Thunderbird 1 IM-35 Greenway 0.2s R44C 19,800 1 56 02121184
S lariat I Hampton Marshall 0.75 USS 32,670 1 67
S Bradley 2 Sena Oak 0.25 R2SC 10,107 1 40
5 Mounts 2 Congress Oak 0.30 R34C 17,334 2 41 12/07/84
S Amarillo 2 Gregg Panhandle/100' 0.40 934C 1J,112 1 45
S Fallmeadow 2 Hwy, 17 Gardenview 0.30 A34C 17,334 1 46 11/28/84
5 Egan 2 Malone Bolivar 0.80 034C 46,223 1 46
5 Anna 2 Panhandle Unfverslty 0.60 R34C 34,657 2 60 12101/84 0
S Sunset 2 Anna Universlty 0135 R34C 20,223 - 1 61
5 Highland 2 Elm Welch 0.60 A30C 30,040 - 2 54
S Bryn Mawr 2 Hinkle Amherst 0.20 A34C 11,616 9 54 11/28/84
+11i
I
111
I
Street Study Ranking
Page 11
Boundaries _ Length Str -Ot Drainage Aiding Distress Total + 155
Rank Street Nerve Quid. No. From To IMlles Class Costs Costs ualit Points [no. and Cont. 1
5 Ponder 2 Oak Linden 6700' 0.50 A34C 29,010 - 1 56
s Norsral 2 Oak Scripture 0,15 134C 8,712 - 2 59
5 Cedar 2 Mulberry McKinney 0.20 134C 11,616 - 2 68
5 Mill Pond 3 Emerson [merlon 0.50 R34C 28,890 - 1 41 12/20/83
5 Boyd 3 University Mingo 0.35 A34C 20,223 - 1 44 11/01/84
5 Darts 3 RuddelI Crawford 0,10 R34C 5,778 - 1 44 11/01184
5 Robin Circle 3 Nottingha+a Cul de sae 0.10 R34C 5,778 1 44
5 Ruddell 3 Paisley Willis 0,20 C22S 6,929 - 4 44
5 Old Lee Ct. 3 Burning Tree Cul de sac 0.05 R34C 2,889 3 46 11/09104
1 5 Audra 3 Mockingbird loop 268 0.50 ass 20,213 3 46 11/02/84
• 5 Cromwell 3 Wellington Yorkshire 0,20 134C 11,556 2 47 11/16/61
5 Mockingbird 3 Audra Paisley 0.50 C25S 20,213 41
5 Yorkshire 3 Kings low Shemosn Drive 0.30 A34C 17,334 - 1 5o tl/08183
5 Virginia 3 Hwy. 380 North End 0.10 134C 5,778 - 3 52 11/16/84
5 Mockingbird 3 RR Audra 0.30 C255 12,12d - 62
5 Woodford Ct. 3 Woodford Dead end 0.05 A34C 2,889 - 2 54 11/01/04
10
5 Frame 3 Woodland University 0.10 A34C [,808 - 2 61
5 Hann 3 Oakland Locust 0.10 025C 4,356 - 2 62
i
•
Street Study Ranking
Page 12
Reny Street Name Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total • 15t 'F
uad. Na: From To fM1}ea class Costs Costs Quality Points Eng. and Cont. '
v
5 Edge wood 3 Northwood Crestwood 0.10 R34C 6,808 1 63
5 Northwood ter 3 Edgewood Cul de sat 0,10 A34C 5,806
t 65
S Sawyer 3 Oakland Locust 0,15 R25C 6,534 1
5 Barrow 1 Westgate Darby 0,10 134C 29,380 0 4
16 ]3,787 ~
S Payne I Bonnie Brae tH-35 1,20 R20S 571,501 120,130 3 77
796,521
S Hampton 1 Marshall Marsh Branch 0,75 A25S 350,602 $1,980 2 79 462,964
5 Cindy I Hwy, 380 Hampton 0.55 R25t 191,605 25,740 2 95
251,091
5 Brook Hollow 1 Oreenway End 0,10 134C 86,7% 0 t
105 99,815
S Lovell 2 Scripture Egan 0.10 R34C 43,398 0 !
71 19,908
5 Roberts 3 Northwood Bel) 0.35 A34C 141,043 121,552 2
73 301,984
5 Texas 3 Auddell Crawford OAS R25S 39,174 19,650 7
• 92 74,278
5 prairie 4 Avenue E Bonnie Braa 0,45 034C 139,235 0 2
73 160,120
5 Bonnie Brie 4 FM 1515 Santa Fe Tracks 0,80 A25S 338,617 75,335 ]
75 476,C45
S Rose}awn 4 Ft, Worth Dr. City Limits 1.35 R25S 60t, 669 137,398
2 85 849,928
• 5 S. Locust 4 South End IN 35 0,20 1255 65,290 0 O
! 86 75,063
S Spencer 4 Woodrow Loop 288 1.40 A255 572,502 206,850
2 92 896,255
5 Acme 4 Fort Worth Dr. S. Locust 0.15 USS 81,612 25,000 2
91 61,]02
5 Avenue E 4 IN 36 Eag11 0,05 C34C 36,806 0 2
102 11,321
4
%
•
•
a
Street Study Ranking
Page 13
ti
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Rlding Distress total ♦ 151
Rink Ctreet Name wd. No. F Me To (miles) Class Costs Costs Quality Points Eno. and Cont.
6 IOCF 4 Eagle highland 0.15 R255 83,761 0 3 110 96,325
5 James 4 Massey Ft. Worth Dr. 0.70 025S 241,573 58,395 4 125 344,963
1,1 locust 3,4 Eagle Mulberry 0__20 A54C 19,166 2 57
0.30 28,750
1,1 West Oak 1,2 Bonnie Brae Jagoe 0.45 A36C 227,795 21,961 2 71 321,295
0.25 15,536 0 0
1,2 Congress 2,3 Oakland Ponder 0.75 C34C 31,944 - 2 69,
0.20 23,232
2,1 Hickory 2,3 Cedar Austin 0.05 A63C 101,695 2 74 116,950
0.15
2,3 Scripture t Thomas Jagoe 0.50 C30C 25,033 2 51 12/05/84
2,3 Sycamore 2,3 Welch Bell 0_60 C30C H,037; - 1 1
2/14!84
0.30 20,030
v 5,2 linden 1,2 Malone Bonnie Brae 0_35 CM 46,235 2 16 12/07/84
• 0.25
5,4 Cordell 1,2 8111crest Malone 0_10 R44C 7 920_
0 30 2j 7f : ak 12/05/84
'F'ta
5,5 Every 1,2 Bonnie Brat Malone 0.35 034C 34,667 - 1 46 12/07/84
• 0.2f
098 Dg
I
, . ..~~Y.. ~wi+.-. ter.- i
• b rtiwA',x,° a ,
i
i
•
Group Three
-Bond Issue Street Data ,
I
REBUILD COSTS RANK
Glenwood 387,739 1
Locust 473,218 1
Audra (Paisley to Divide) 578,851 1
Paisley 4,356 Y
Pertain 4,356 I
Greenwood 11,616 1
Nottingham 57,869 1
Frame/RRX/S. McKinney 17,424 l
Oak 17,424 1
Old North Road 27,720 l
Mingo 116,160 1
Locust/Eagle/Mulberry 47,916 1
Locust/Mulberry/Hickory 5,628 1
Congress $4,890 1
•
Audra 29,480 1
Austin/McKinney,Mulbe.rry 8,666 1
Emerson 86,669 L
• Mockingbird/McKinn y Criole 18,889 2 A •
Locust/McKinney/Congress 15,198 1
King's Raw 23,118 I
•
I- 47
•
E
Group III-Bond Issue Street Data
Page 2
January 22, 1985
Greemwood 40,445 1
Locust/03k/McKinney 4,431 1
Paisley 13,857 1
First 8,667 1
Paisley 8,085 1
Robinwood 34,668 1
Withers 17,334 1
Locust/1 ckory/Oak 5,6:8 1
TOTAL COST FOR RANK 11 $2,130,902.00
Bell 86,346 2
Hickory 310,241 2
Hickory 116,950 2
Linwood 14,520 2
Cardinal 37,752 2
Walnut 5,808 2
Archer Trail 26,136 2
14istywood 34,676 2
•
Sycamore 45,067 2
Churchill/Windsor/Nottingham 20,223 2
Foxcrcft 40,445 2
• Industrial 13,869 2 •
Hanover 14,445 2
Churchill/Burning Tree( Nottingham 5,778 2
11
• 4)
5
Q
A
Group III Bond Issue Street Data
Page 3
January 22, 1985
Third 15,020 2
TOTAL COST FOR RANK R2 $787,276.00
Locust 6820095 3
Mistywood 258,709 3
Oriole 108,133 3
Wood 29,040 3
I
Heather 23,232 3
Rockwond 17,424 3
Kayewood 31,944 3
Laurelwood 26,136 3
Dover 110559 3
Williamsburg 11,556 3
Avon/Stratford/Heather 80667 3
Dunes 14,445 3
Royal Lane 15,412 3
0 TOTAL COST FOR RANK I3 $1,2389352.00
a
Cherrywood 87,338 4
Woodhaven 95,656 4
0 Rose 42,572 4 •
Woodland 29,040 4
Crawford 170424 4
Live Oak 110556 4
•
i a
•
Group III-Bond Issue Street Data
Page 4
January 22, 1985
Third 10,013 4
Bradshaw 17,334 4
Campbell 20,223 4
Palmwood 2,889 4
Pecan 6,935 4
Frame/RR Tracks/Grove 14,445 4
Austin 28,299 4
TOTAL COST FOR RANK #4 $383,724.00
Texas 74,978 5
Robe,cs 301,984 S
Sawyer 6,534 S
Northwood Terrace 5,808 S
Edgewood 5,808 5
Hann 4,356 5
Frame/koodland/Unly. 5,808 S
Woodford (Circle) Ctr 2,889 5
•
Mockingbird/RR/Audra 12,128 5
Yorkshire 17,334 5
Cromwell 11,SS6 S
• Mockingbird 20,213 S • 41
Old Lee Court 2,889 5
Audra 20,213 S
• iii i. i
• 4 t ♦ . n x,.74
r
q
M
Group III-Bond Issue Street Data
Page 5
January 22, 1985
Robin Circle 5,778 5
B''yd 20,225 5
Davis 5,778 5
Mill Pond 28,890 5
TOTAL COST FOR RANK I5 $553,167,00
2091M
e r.
I
•
r
STREET STUDY RANKINGS 11
Boundaries Street Distress
Street Name From To Costs Points
III IIcre st Scripture Emery 47,018 60
Avenue C Mulberry Oak 15,798 44
Bolivar Congress University 40,954 44
Kings How Stuart Sherman 40,445 44
i
Ella Prairie Highland 7,Q99 46
Magnolia New Asphalt Hinkle 14,445 47
Elm Congress Oak 26,588 So
Stuart Kings Row Coronado 34,667 52
Elm Mulberry Prairie 15,798 SS
Hercules Picadllly Sheraton 17,334 SS
0 Carroll Northtidge Ross 29,040 57
Oak Austin Bolivar 17,424 61
Ilercules Redstone Stuart 26,400 62
{
Stuart Hercules kings Row 23,112 66
6 Locust Hickory Oak 5,628 42 0
Withers Oakland Mingo 17,334 43
Rvbinwood Emerson University 34,668 44
Paisley Woodford Ile ttIe 81085 45
Locust Oak McKinney 4,431 46
Paisley Frame Ruddell 13,857 46
i
i
•
•
a
•
e
First Bolivar Locust 8,667 46
Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywood 40,445 47
Kings Row Sherman Yorkshire 230118 49
Mockingbird McKinney Oriole 100' 28,889 51
Locust McKinney Congress 15,798 S1
Emerson Freedom Wilsonwood 86,669 52
Austin McKinney Mulberry 8,666 53
Audra McKinney End of Divide 29,480 S4
Locust Mulberry Hickory S,628 S5
Mingo Withers Mockingbird 116,160 58
Old North Road University Mill Pond 27,720 59
Frame RRX S. McKinney 17,424 61
Nottingham University Windsor S7,869 62
Greenwood Cherrywood Sherman 11,616 64
Locust University Sherman Drive 5,662 64
Elm University Congress SS,440 66
• Paisley lie ttIe Ruddell 4,356 66
Pertain Mingo Wayne 4,356 66
McCormick Parvin Wlllowwood 17,334 49
lloIIyhi11 Rldgecrest Tennyson 63,S57 SI
Avenue D Highland lH-3S 14,445 54
0 Hobson Lane Teasley FM-1830 504094 S6
Bonnie Brac Riney Windsor 397,876 7S
Bonnie Brae Windsor University 301,SS7 77
Bonnie Brae University Scripture 8999984 90
Scripture 111- 35 Bonnie Brae 347,907 99
West Oak I11-35 Y 2079876 il4
Hickory Avenue C Bonnie Brae 372,479 72
• ;
0
•
s
Oak Bolivar Jagoe 461,440 70
hickory Avenue C Welch 100,547 72
Nagnolla New Asphalt Bolivar 176,991 74
Bolivar Northridge University 471,615 76
Fry Scripture Oak 113,740 78
Stuart Selene Hercules 123,S9S 78
Hickory Carroll Cedar 105,045 79
Welch Mulberry hickory 53,694 79
Pershing Stuart Atlas
79,020 97
Avenue C III-J-5 Mulberry 5S6 78!
Locust as
Shaman Orr 473,118 79
Audra End of Divide Paisley 61,244
Glenwood 83
Windsor University 387,739 85
Avenue A Highland McCormick 2100028 7S
Acme Bernard Fort Worth Dr. 61,302 94
Elm Highland Eagle 314,516 85
Locust Eagle Mulberry 47,916 57 4
West Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe 3210295 71
• Congress Oakland Ponder SS1176 69
Hickory Cedar Austin 116,950 74
Teasley Lane Dallas Drive Ryan Road 100004000
Locust Congress University 682,095 82
• Total Street Cost for Rank 01
$9,735,044
21014
i
l
0
~ 4a
0
1 /4
STREET STUDY RANKINGS 02
Street Name From Boundaries To Street Distress
r
Costs Points
Masch Branch Universtiy Jim Christal 81,200
Mulberry Elm Bernard
24,654 40
Alice Congress Egan 5,007 44
Alice Egan University 43,334
Scripture 49
Nryan Ponder 7,234 bl
Fry Oak Ifickory 5808 Third , 61
Bolivar Locust 15,020 43
Churchill Burning Tree Nottingham 5,778 Hanover Windsor 44
Emerson 14,445 qS ~
industrial Hickory Bell
• Foxcroft 130869 45
Emerson Emerson 40,445 47
Churciiiil Windsor Nottingham 20,223 Mist wood 52
Y Nottingham Woodhaven 349676 55
Archer Ttall Emerson Emerson
Cardinal 26,136 S6
McKinney End 37,7S2 • Walnut Austin 60 0
Ceder 51808 by ~
Linwood Sherman Crestwood 14,510 64
Centrdl
Eagle Highland 8,667 40
40
Dudley McCormick Jacqueline S o778 Oakwood 40
Mercedes Cul de sac 50778 40
i
7
• o j
W
1
McCormick Willowwood 111- 35
37,556 40
Wisteria Willowwood Golf 5,778 40
Chasewood Pembrooke hoodbrook
5,778 40
Kendolpli Willowwood 111-35 280890 Collier 41
IH-35 Eagle 17,334 41
Savannah Teasley Longridge 230112 43
Welch Eagle Highland 10,402 '
Woodbrook 43
Pennsylvania I11.35 61,647 qq
Willowwood McCormick Bernard 10,393
Travers 44
Hopkins Drive Piping Rock 21889 44
Willowwood Bonnie Brae Highland Park 16,170 45
Westwood Parvin Willowwood 20,213
45
Ridgecrest Pennsylvania Ridgecrest 104,002 46
Myrtle Daugherty Collins 14,445 47
Jacqueline Parvin Willowwood 230112 49
Wilshire Avenue C Avenue D S,778 54
Willow Springs Shady Oaks Kerley 11,556 55
Pembrooke Longridge Fairfax
37,752
Bernard Hickory Eagle 31,680 61
Bell 68
University Sherman 86,346 80
Hickory Aust111 RR 310,241
94
Scripture Thoma!. Jagoe 25,033 51
Y Sycamore Welch Bell 4S,067 •
S4
Total Street Cost for Rank 12 $1,315,316
2101M
I
a
•
ar
STREET STUDY RANKINGS I3
q
i
Boundaries Street
Street Name From Distress
To Costs Points
Beilmcad
Emery Thomas ,
Mesa Barcelona 11,556 qg
University 20 400
Welch Hickory '
Oak 5,007 40
Yellowstone Sun Valley Kings Row
Coronado Locust Bell
17,334 41
Scripture Jagoe 17'334 43
Bryan 100013 44
Georgetown Bowling Green Universit
Crescent Malone y 35, qq
Bolivar 69,3353
53
Ector /4
Scripture
University S5,478 49
Lover Sherman
Avon 12,559 qg
ileadlee Hinkle
Denison Bolivar 28,889 51
Sherman University S808
Westway Bolivar ' 60
Fulton 26,136 69
Royal Lane Mistywood
Rockwood 156412 44
Avon Stratford
Heather 8,667 44 0
4! Dunes Windsor
Old Orchard Road 11,445 44
Williamsburg Nottingham Jamestown
Oak RR 11,556 46
Austin 26,480 52
Laurelwood Xayewood
University 26 136
Kayewood Crestwood ' S8
Greenwood 31,944 62
~rrr ...y 1 ~ rte. wra V~IY J4 't • r!Y i
O
Rockwood Emerson
Heather Laurelwood 17,424 64
Stratford Oxford
Locksley 23,232 6S
Emerson Nottingham
Wood McKlni.e 14, 520 67
y
Bernard Texas 29,040
rd Willowwood 67
Thomas Oak Emery 51808 65
Marshall Emery 413,125 73
mxy. 380 Hampton
Pearl 330,646 76 r
Denton Carroll
Mistywood Woodhaven 45,749 70
Oriule Robtnwood 258,709 70
Mockingbird Cardinal
Maple Avenue D 108,133 145
Linden Malone Bernard 189,048 83 y
Bonnie Brae 46,23S 46
Total Cost for Rank 03
$2,030,323
2101.4
O
O
i
o
o
e ~
1
i
i'
STREET STUDY RANKINGS 04
Boundaries Street Distress
Street Name From To Costs Points
t
Stanley Emery Panhandle 28,889 55
Colt Westway Congress 40,445 41
Manhattan Sherman Stuart 17,334 44
Avenue 8 Oak Hickory 3,467 45
Atlas Redstone Hercules 17,334 49
Gober Cordell Scripture 34,667 51
Sena Malone Ector 20,223 SS
Denton Crescent Hickory 4,350 56
Mimosa Bolivar Hinkle 31,944 56
• Denison Sherman Headlee 23,232 S9
Emery Fulton-200' Carroll 20,328 60 0
Austin Oakland Parkway 28,299 44
t
Frame RR Tracks Grove 14044S 44
Palmwood Glenwood Keyewood 2,889 4S
• Campbell McKinney Paisley 20,223 4S Ob
Pecan Cedar Austin 60935 45
Bradshaw Paisley McKinney 179334 46
Live Oak Sherman Robinwood 11,556 48
Third Locust Oakland 10,013 48
~ O
•
I- a
•
1
Crawford Texas McKinney 17,424 64
Woodland Cherrywood Sherman 29,040 69
Avenue B Maple Underwood 15,020 SS
Camden Court Londonderry Cul de sac 2,889 55
So. Locust IM-35 Eagle 4,356 60
Cherrywood Greenwood Woodland 87,338 77
soodhaven Mistywood Emerson 95,656 77
Rose Paisley Texas 42,572 89
Kingswood Londonderry Cul de sac 20,794 75
Cordell Hiilcrest Malone 31,680 61
i
Total Street Cost for Rank 14 $700,676 }
2101M
X
`4 • 4
P
p
r ~
p 0
_ _ _ ..,,_k
BUND ISSUE STREET DATA
MILES COST/MILE TOTAL COST
34' Wide 45' Wide
OVERLAY 93.10 $ 58,000 3 79,000 $ 2,647,600
REPAVING; 27.25 4 581UUO $ 790000 $ 11373,900
RE8U!LUINU 24.5 4397,000 $518,232 $150178,000
TOTAL STREET
A MAINTENANCE
NEEDED $Iy~13g~q
O d
2017M
. S:: .r 'i 'n'4 ,+i ir,.•.;'. F'7 A IFT V' . tai 1 { C,il;
♦ Y,
d
MATGMING FUNDS FOR STATE PROJECTS
Loop 2tid $250,000
Ua 38U
$900,000""
FM 2lbI $1,0000000'
U3 377
$700,000•
" Project is not in any program. No funds have been allocated.
AR Project in Capital Inprovement Program. No bonds approved.
0
2U7oM
7
aV
•
p
r
•
#7
Table III
DISTRESS POINTS 40 69
Boundaries Length Street Orainip Afding Distress Date List Rated
Street Name From To Miles CIA$$ Costs Costs ua11 Points Mo. Oar Yr.
Central Eagle Highland 0.15 R34C $ 8,661 1 40 12112/84
Dudley McCormick Jacqueline 0.17 R34C 5,778 1 40 12/14/64
Oakwood Mercedes Cut de sac 0.10 R34C 5,778 2 40 12/14/84
MCC"ick W1llowwood IH-35 0.65 R34C 37,556 2 40 12/14/84
Welch Hickory Oak 4.10 930C 5,007 40 12/14184
Wisteria Will( wood Golf 0,10 R34C S,778 2 40 12/14/64
Mulberry Elm Bernard 0.40 C36C 24,654 - 2 40 12/12/84
Bradley Sena Oak 0.25 R25C 10,107 1 40
Chasewood Pembrooke WoodbrooK 0.10 R34C 5,778 1 40
• Yellowstone Arn Yalley Kings Row 0,30 R34C 17,334 - 2 41 11/16/84
Kendolph Yillowwood IH-35 0150 R34C 28,890 2 41 12114/84
Collier IM-35 Eagle 0.30 R34C 11,334 1 41 12/11/84
i
O Mounts Congress Oak 0.30 R34C 17,334 2 41 12/01/84 O
Colt Westway Congress 0.70 R34C 40,445 2 41
Nf11 Pond Eorrton Emerson 0,50 R34C 28,890 - 1 41 12/20/83
locust Hickory Oak 0.05 A63C 5.428 2 42
Page Total 264,956
. I
•
_ a
•
Street Study
Table 111
Page Two
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Name From _ To Mlles) Class Costs Costs all , Points Mo. Day Tr.
Corona m locust Bell 0.30 C34C $ 17,334 - 3 43 11/28184 L
Savannah Teasley Longridge 0.40 R34C 23,112 2 43 12/28/84
HelCO Eagle Highland 0.15 C4DC 10,402 2 43 12/12164
a .
Third Bolivar Locust 0.30 R25C 15,02U 1 43
'S
kithers Oakland Mingo 0.30 R34C 17.334 - 1 43
i
Boyd University Mingo 0.35 R34C 20,223 - 1 44 11/01184?
Scripture Jagoe Bryan 0.20 C30C 1D,013 2 44 11/05/84
Woodbrook Pennsylvania 14.35 0.80 R44C 61,647 - 2 44 11128/64
Georgetown Bowling Green University 0.70 R30C 35,047 - 2 44 11128/84
Millowwood McCormick Bernard 0,30 0225 10,393 3 44 12/14/e4
• Davis RuddelT Crawford Olio R34C 6,118 1 44 11/01/84
Royal Lane Mistywood Rockwood 0,20 R44C 15,412 1 44 11/09/84 11
Avenue C Mvloerry Oak 0,20 R46,50 1r,798 - 2 44 12/12/84
k
Robinwood Emerson Lnlverstty DAD R34C 34,668 - 2 44 71/02/84
O Alice Congress Egan 0.10 R30C 5,007 44 •
Austln Oakland Parkway 0.70 RISC 28,299 - 1 44
Avon Stratford Heather 0.15 R34C 81661 2 44 11/08/83
Page Total $334,154
•
c
•
s
i
1
Street Study i
Table III
Page Three
Boundaries Length Street Cralnage Riding Distress Date Last Rated 1
Street Name Frog To Liles Class Costs Costs Quality Points No. Cay Yr.
ii
Bolivar Congress University 0.80 C30C 40,054 4 44
Churchill Burn Tree Nottingham 0.10 R34C 5,778 - 44 11/29/83
Crescent More Bolivar 0.90 R44C 69,353 1 44
i
Dunes Windsor Old Orchard Rd 0.25 R34C 14,445 - 1 44 11/29/83
Frame RR Tracks Grove 0.25 R34C 14,445 1 44
Kings Row Stuart Sherman 0.70 C30C 40,445 - 1 44 11108/83
Nanhattan Sherawn Stuart 0.30 R34C 17,334 - 2 44
Rcbin Circle Nottingham Cut de sac 0.10 R34C 5,118 1 44
Riddell Paisley Willis 0.20 MS 6,929 - 4 34
Travers Hopkins Drive Piping Rock 0.05 R34C 2,889 1 44 10/11/83
•
Palmwood Glenwood Kayewood 0.0', R34C ?,989 - 1 4S 11/02/84
Paisley Woodford Hattie 0.20 C24S 8,085 - 3 45 11/01/84
Campbell McKinney Paisley 0.35 R34C 20,213 1 45 11/01/84
f
• Willowwood Bonnle Brae Highland Park 0.40 0155 16,170 2 45 12/14/64 0
Amarillo Gregg Panhandle I1DO' 0.40 R34C 23,112 1 45
Avenue B Oak Hlckory 0.05 R4DC 3,467 - 1 45
Hanover Windsor Emerson 0.25 R34C 14.445 1 45 12/20/83
Page Total $305,841
m
•
I
I
I
I
i
Street Study j
Table III
Page Four
I
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated
1
Street Name From to Miles Class Costs Costs Quality Points Mo. Day Yr. j
I
Industrial Hlckory Bell 0.20 R40C 13,869 1 45
Pecan Cedar Austin 0.10 R40C 6,935 2 45
Westwood Parvin killowwuod 0.35 R34C 20,223 1 45
I
Las Colinas Mesa IN-35 O.OS R44C 3,853 1 46 02/21/84
Old Lee Ct. Burning Tree Cut de sac 0.05 R34C 2,889 3 45 11/09/84
Falimeadow Hwy, 77 Oardenview 0.30 R34C 17,334 1 016 11/28/64
Linden Malone Bonnie Brae 0,60 C44C 46,235 2 46 12/07/84
Colonial Augusta Thunderbird 0.15 R34C 8,667 1 46
Ridgecrest Pennsylvania Ridgecrest 1.80 R34_ 104,002 2 45 12/28/84 L
Locust Oak McKinney 0.05 A50C 4431 3 46
Elm Prairie Highland 0.10 A45C 7,899
2 46
Emery Bonnie Brae Malone 0.60 R34C 34,667 1 46 12/07/84
Paisley Frame Ruddell 0.40 C22S 13,857 2 46 11/01/84
♦ Audra Mockingbird Loop 288 0.50 C25S 20,213 3 46 11/02/84 •
Bradshaw Paisley McKinney 0.3D R34C 17,334 1 46 `
Elm Prairie Highland 0,10 0
Egan Malone Bolivar 0.80 R34C 46.223 - 1 46
Page Total $36e,631
O
l
•
Street Study
Table III
~e
r
Page Fire
Boundaries length Street Drainage Riding Distress
Street Name From To Nlies class Costs Costs Quality Points Date Last Rated
No. Day Yr.
First Polfvar locust 0.15 R34C 8,667 1 46
Williamsburg Nottingham Jamestown 0,20 R34C 11,556 - 2 46
Fovcroft Emerson Emerson 0,70 R34C 40,445 1 47 11/02!84
Cromwell Wellington Yorkshire 0.20 R34C II,S56 2 47
11/16/84 a
Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywood 0.70 R34C 40,445 2 41
Magnoila New Asphalt Hinkle 0.15 R34C 14,445 47
Mockingbird Audra Paisley 0.50 C255 W. 213 47
Myrtle Daugherty Collins 0,15 R34C 14,445 2 47
Live Oak Sherman Robinwood 0.20 R34C 11,556 2 48 11/16/84
Third Locust D;Aland 0.20 R30C 10,013 48
• Jacqueline Parvin Willowwood 0.40 R34C 23,112 1 49
12/H/B4
Bellmead Emery Thomas 0,20 R34C 11,556 - 3 49 12/05/84
Atlas Redstone Hercules 0.30 R34C 17,334
2 49 11/16/64 ~
Ector Scripture University 0,80 C40C 55,478 2 49
• ~ 12/05/64 O
McCormick Parvin Wflsonwood 0.30 R34C 11,334 2 49 12/14/84
Alice Egan University 0.75 R34C 43,334 2 49
Dover Sherman Avon 0.15 R44C 11,559 1 49 11/08/83
Page Total $363,048
y
p
s
Street Study
Table III`
Page Six
i
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Lest Rated
Street Name From To W715 Class Casts Costs Quality Points Mo. Day Yr.
i
Kings Row Sherman Yorkshire 0.30 C44C $ 23,118 49 11/08/83
Anna Panhandle University 0.60 R34C 34,657 - 2 50 12/07/84
Elm Congress Oak 0.30 A5DC 26,588 2 50
u
Yorkshire Kings Row Sherman Drive 0.3D R34C 17,334 - 1 50 11/08183
i.
Greenway Augusta arook h011ow 0.25 R44C 19,265 I 51 02/21/84
Hollyhlll Ridgecrest Tennyson 1,10 R34C 63,551 - 2 51 12/28/84
Headlee Hinkle Bolivar 0.50 R34C 28,889 2 51 11/28/84
Scripture Thomas Jagoe 0.50 C30C 25,033 - 2 51 12/05/84
{
Mockingbird McKinney Orfocet 100' 0.50 R34C 28,889 1 51.
Sunset Anna University 0.35 R34C 20,223 I 51
• Locust McKinney Congress 0.20 A45C 15,798 - 2 51
35
Oober Cordell Scripture 0.60 R34C 34,667 - 2 52 12/05/94
Emerson Freedom Wilsonwood 1.50 934C 86,669 - 2 52 11/02/84
• Virginia Hwy. 38U North End 0.10 R34C 5,778 - 3 52 11/16/64 •
Churchill Nfndsor Nottingham 0.3S R34C 2D,223 1 52 11/29/83
J Mockingbird RR Audri 0.30 C255 12,128 - 52
Oak RR Austin 0.30 ASSC 29.480 2 52
Page Total $492,306
•
i
1
i
• it
{
Street Study
Table III
Page hwen
Y
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Name From To Miles Class Costs Costs Quality Points Mo. Day Tr.
!`S
1 -
r
-
Stuart Kings Row Coronado 0.60 C34C j 34,667 52
Austin McKinney Mulberry 0.15 R34C 8,666 - 2 53
Woodford Ct. Woodford Dead end 0,05 R34C 2,889 - 2 54 11/01/84
Wilshire Avenue C Avenue 0 0.10 P34S 5,178 - 2 54 12/12/84
Syca::Yre Welch Bell 0.90 C30C 45,067 1 54 12/14/84
Audra McKinney End of Divide 0.30 CM 2g,480 1 54
Avenue 0 Highland IM-35 0.25 R34C 14,445 2 54
3
Congress Oakland Carroll 0.95 C34C 54,890 - 2 54
Hfghiand Elm Welch 0.60 UDC 30,04D - 2 54
Sena Malone Ector 0.35 R34C 20,223 2 55 12/07/84
Elm Mulberry Prairie 0.20 A45C 15,798 - 2 55
Avenue a Maple Underwood 0.30 R30C 15,020 - 2 55
4fr
Locust Mulberry Hickory 0105 ASDC 5,628 - 2 55
Camden Ct. Londonderry Cul de sac 0.05 R34C 2,889 - 2 SS
Hercules Picadi)Ty Sheraton 0.30 C34C 11,334 1 SS
A Mistywood Nottingham Woodhaven 0.45 R44C 34,616 2 55 •
Stanley Emery Panhandle 0,50 R34C 28,889 - 1 55
Willow Sprfngs Shady Oaks Kerley 0,10 C34C 11,556 2 55
Page total ; 377,935
12
Total Overlay (40-55) ,521,504
• 4 -
•
a
•
Street Study
Table I[[
Page Eight
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Rldfng Distress Date Last Rated
Street Name From To Miles C1~ss Costs Costs Quality Points Mo. Jay Yr.
Bryn Mawr Hinkle Amherst 0.20 R34C $ 11,616 - 2 56 11/28/84
Thunderbird IH-35 Green way 0.25 R44C 19,800 1 56 02/21/84
Archer Trall Emerson Emerson 0.45 R34C 26,136 1 56 12/20/83
Denton Crescent Hickory 0.75 R34C 4,350 - 1 $6
Hobson lane Teasley £M-1830 1.15 0255 50,094 2 56
Mimosa 9olfvar Hinkle O.S5 R34C 31,944 2 56
Ponder U,k Linden 8100 0.50 R34C 29,040 1 56
Carroll Northridge Ross 0.50 A36C 29,040 - 2 57 11128/84
Locust Eagle Mulberry 0.50 A54C 41,916 2 57
Laurelwood Kayewood University 0.45 R34C 26,136 2 58
• Mingo Withers Mockingbird 2.20 8305 116,160
2 58
Denison Sherman Headlee 0.40 R34C 13,232 69
Normal Oak Scripture 0.15 R34C 8,712 2 59
® Old North Road University Mill Pond 0.35 C44C 27,720 - 1 59 12/20/83 O
Hillcrest Scripture Emery 0.65 k4OC 41.016 - 2 60 12/05/84
Cardinal McKinney End 0.65 R34C 37,151 l 60 11102184
Page Total $$36,666
• 0
•
o _
•
i
i ,
i
•
*3.
Street Study
Table 111
Page Mine '
Boundaries _ length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date last Rated
Street Name Frog To Mfles rless Casts Costs Quality Points Mo. Dal Tr,
,
Denison Sherman University 0.10 R34C 5,808 2 60
Emery Fulton 6200' Carroll 0.35 R34C 20,?73 2 60 k
So. Locust IH 35 Eagle 0.10 R25S 4.~;6 - 3 60
Walnut Austin Cedar 0.10 R34C 5,808 - 2 60
Scripture Bryan Ponder 0.10 C40S 7,234 2 61 12/05/84
Cordell Hlllcrest Malone 0.40 R44C 31,680 2 61 12/05/84
Frame RRX S. McKinney 0.30 R34C 17,424 - 2 61
Frame Woodland University 0.10 P34C 5,808 2 61
Fry Oak Hickory 0.10 R34C 5,808 61
• Oak Austin Bolivar 0.20 ASOC 17,424 2 61
Pembroake longridge Fairfax 0.65 934C 37,752 _ 3 62 12/28/64 ;
Audra McKinney End of Divide 0.30 C55C 28,750 1 62
Hann Oakland locust 0.10 R25C 4,3S6 - 2 62
• Hercules Redstone Stuart 0.25 C60C 26,400 - 1 62 •
3t
Kayewood Crestwood Gre nwood 0.55 934C 31,944 2 62
Nottingham Artlyerslty Windsor 0.80 A40C 57,869 - 2 62
Edgewood Northwood Crestwood 0.10 R34C 5,808 1 63
i
Page Total $314,551
i
IJI~
•
I c•
•
r
Street Study
Table III
Page Ten
8oundarlas _ Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Lest Rated
Street Name From To Miles Class Costs Costs Quality Points Mo. Day Yr.
Rockwood Everson Laurelwood 0.30 R34C 17,424 1 64 11/02/84
Crawford Texas McKinney 0,30 R34C 17,424 2 64 s
r
Greenwood Cher.'ywiod She rea1 0.20 R34C 11,615 2 64
Linwood Sherman Crestwood 0,25 R34C 14,520 2 64
Locust University Orr 0.65 A34C 37,752 - 2 64
Heather Stratford D~ford 0.40 R34C 23,232 2 6S 11/16/B4
Bernard willowood SH-35 0.10 R36C 5,808 3 65
Northwood Ter Edgewood Cut de sac 0.10 A34C 5,808 - 1 65
Elm University Congress 0.70 A45C 55,440 2 66
Paisley Hattie Riddell 0.10 C24S 4,356 2 66 11/01/84
•
Pertain Mingo Wayne 0.10 R25S 4,356 2 66 11701/84
Stuart Hercules Kings Row 0.40 C34C 23,112 66
Lariat Hampton 4arshal1 0.75 R25S 32,670 - 1 67
• Locksley Emerson Nottingham 0,25 R34C 14,520 1 67 12/20/83 -
Wood McKinney Texas DISC R34C 29,040 - 2 67
Bernard Hickory Eagle 0,60 A30C 31,680 - 2 68
Page Total $328,758
y: V
0
c>
0
0
Street Study 1
Table III
Page Eleven
Boundaries length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Name Frpa_ To _ Niles Class Costs costs Quality Points Mo. Dar Tr.
Cedar Mulberry McKinney 0,20 R34C 11,616 2 68 j
Sawyer Oakland Locust 0.15 A25C 6,534 - 1 68
Congress Oakland Ponder 0.95 C34C $5,176 2 69
kestwey Bolivar Fulton 0.45 R34C 26,136 2 69
ti0061and Cherrywood Sherman 0,50 R34C 29.040 - 2 69
Page Total $ 128,502
Total Cost Repave X56.701 $1,308,483 ~
{I
1. Overlay Total • 2,521,504
Estimate - Ss Cont. _ 126,075 7
2,647,579
2. Repave - Total 1,308,413
5% Cont. 65,424
1,373,907
B r I
09578
i
i
. , oe.V,as•.~r- sw,^`-.._.. 0 ~ i,.- . y ..b :l a`,t r~ r+ 'r`;'l ,~,:.ik ,
%
i
i
0
i
Table IN
DISTRESS POINTS 70 -
REBUILD
n
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total • 155
Street Name From To Niles) CIO%$ Costs Costs Quality Polnts Eng. and Co t.
Mistywood NOOdbaven Robinwood 0.20 R44C 101,965 117,000 2 70 $ 258,709
Zak Bolivar dagoe 1.00 A36C 336,334 91,800 2 7D 461,440
Pearl Denton Carroll 0.10 R34C 39,781 0 1 70 45,749
Lovell Scripture Egar 0.10 R34C 43,398 0 2 71 49,908
Nest Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe 0.70 A36C 221,795 43,500 2 71 321,295
Hickory Avenue C Bonnie Brae 0.70 A45C 323,895 0 2 72 372,479
Hickory Avenue C Welch 0.40 A36C 146,263 26,125 3 72 200,547
Thomas Oak Emery 0,85 R34C 329,101 30,225 2 73 413,225
Pralrie Avenue E Bonnie Brae 0.45 034C 139,235 0 2 73 160,120
•
Roberts Northwood Bell 0.35 R34C 141,043 121,552 2 73 301,994
Hickory Cedar Austin 0.20 A636 101,695 0 2 74 116,950
Magnolia New Asphalt Bolivar 0.30 R34C 108,495 45,410 2 14 116,991
• Avenue A Highland McCormick 0.55 R34C 182,633 0 2 75 210,028
Bonnie Brae FM 1515 Santa Fe Tracks 0.80 AM 338,617 15,'15 3 79 476,04'
BOnnle Brae Riney Windsor 0.65 C25S 345.979 0 3 75 397,076 '
Kingswood Londonderry Cut do sac 0.05 434C 18,082 0 2 75 20.794
Page Total $3,984,14r
• Y ',a. L.., r ,ice `4T ~~Y~,^~''e ..la 6rh.+' :..i~~.,, y
J,
d
I
Q
o
I
o
I
i
-1
Street Study
Table IV
Page Two
I
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total ~ 1Ss
Street Name Fro* to Milesl Class Costs Costs uail t~y Points Eno, and Cont.
Barrow Payne Darby 0.10 R34C $ 29,380 0 4 76 : 33,787
Bolivar Northridge University 0.10 A34C 260,388 149,712 2 76 4;1,615
Marshall Hwy. 380 Hampton 0.60 R25S 266,280 21,238 2 76 330,646
Bonnie Brie Windsor University 0.10 C25S 247,824 14,400 3 11 301,551
Cnerrywood Greenwood Woodland 0.20 R34C 75,946 0 2 77 81,338
Payne North Leg 18-3S 1.20 A20S $72,502 120,130 3 77 796,527
Woodhaven Mlstywood Emerson 0.30 R34C 83.179 0 2 77 85,456
Fry Scripture Oak 0.20 R34C 17,155 21,150 2 78 113,740
Stuart Selene Hercules 0 101,411 0 78 123,595
Hickory Carroll Ceder 0.10 A36C 73,227 18,160 2 79 105,045
Hampton Marshall Marsh Branch 0.75 R25S 350,602 51,980 2 79 462,964
Locust Sherman Orr 0.55 A34Y 306,718 104,775 3 79 413,218
Welch Mulberry Hickory 0110 270 31 066 15,625 79 $3,694
sell University Sherman 0.30 C31C* 75,083 0 3 80 86,346 O
O
Texas Auddell Crawford 0.05 125S 39,174 49,650 3 82 74,918
Audra End of Divide Mockingbird 1.00 379,449 123,900 83 $78,851
Maple Avenue 0 Bernard 0.70 R34C 251,346 0 2 83 289,048
Page Total ;4,178,605
i
Q
Street Study
Table IV
Page Three
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total s 155
Street Name From To Miles- Class Costs Costs alit Points En?. and Cont.
Avenue C IH-35 Mulberry 0.70 C55C E 419,347 64,810 2 85 556,781
Glenwood Windsor University 0.70 R34C 264,004 73,160 2 85 387,739
Roselawn Ft. Worth Dr. City Lioits 1.35 RZSS 601, 669 137,398 2 85 849,928
S. Locust South Ird IH 35 0.20 RZSS 65,290 0 2 86 75,083
Anse Paisley Texas 0.15 R25S 37,014 0 2 09 42,572
Bonnfe Brae University Scripture 0.75 C4SS 372,970 409,625 3 90 899,964
Spencer Woodrow Loop 288 1,40 425S 572,502 206,850 2 92 896,255
Acme Bernard S. Locust 0.25 A2SS 81,612 25,000 2 94 122,604
Hickory Austin RR 0.30 ASSC 182,325 87,450 2 94 310,241
Cindy Hwy. 380 Hampton 0.55 R25S 192,605 25,740 2 95 251,097
•
Pershing Stuart Atlas 0.20 A34C 68,713 0 1 97 79,020
Scripture 1H-35 Bonnie Brae 0.50 C22S 226,338 76,190 3 99 347,907
Avenue E IM 35 Eagle 0.05 C34C 36,806 0 2 102 42,327
Q Brook Hollow Greenway End 0.10 A34C 86,796 0 1 105 99,61S Q
IOOF Eagle Hfgnland 0.15 R25$ 83,761 0 3 110 %,325
West Oak IH-35 Y 0.30 A64C 156,612 24,250 4 114 207.876
Page Total $5,26S,5S4
s
~ 6s
•
i
4
Street Study
Table 1V
Page Four
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Total • 15%
Street Name From To Miles Cuss Costs Costs Quality Poin;s- ink and Cont.
dames Massey Ft, Worth Dr. 0.70 R25S $ 241,573 58,395 4 125 ; 344,963
Oriole Mock IngbIrd Cardinal 0.35 934C 94,029 0 3 145 108,133
Locust Congress University 0.70 A31C 404,176 la3,m - 82 682,095
Elm Highland Eagle 0.15 A41C 93,242 180,250 85 314,516
Page Total $1,449,707
Rebuild Total 15,178,006
GRAND TOTAL $19,199,492
•
o a
09579
• 0 7 ',^~t eye"l~ ~.i
•
c>
STREET EXPENDITURES
DIVISIONS MATERIAL
BUDGET
NEAR PATCH DRAIN CONST TOTAL PATCH DRAIN CONST TOTAL
74/75 610,422 -
166,473
75/76 746,375 179,801
76/77 $291,453 $165,634 $335,997 793,084 203,106
77/70 272,515 215,914 348,651 837,060 283,541
70/79 250,050 148,113 348,309 746,472 $ 91,31C ; 10,638 $110,346 220,300
79/80 285,637 185,?i2 298,050 769,189 98,460 9,460 86,683 194,603
80/81 354,102 178,637 269,058 801,797 141,388 814 47,108 189,310
61/82 365,627 216,011 353,107 936,745 111,761 50,845 120,653 283,259
82/63 382,154 224,706 466,372 1,073,232 134,836 25,173 68,640 228,849
83/84 464,061 229,955 508,078 1,222,094 159,600 12,016 70,429 242,045
84/85• 660,853 286,622 586,657 1,734,132 497,997 27,440 235,206 70,643
*Proposed
STREET AND BRIDGE ACCOUNT
82/83 $113,569
83/84 140,347
e ~ • 0
• f lkti. if ~~,~2 ~1 n iG 4.~r9 .`S'W ati'-~.
•
•
F
MATERIAL EKPENDITUPE
1000
[ 900
E H
% 800
P
E T 700
N H
0 0 600
1 U
T S 500
U A
R H 400
E D
5 300
200
100
0-
74/75 75/76 76/77 77/78 78/79 79/80 80/81 81/82 82183 83/P4 84/85
• FISCAL YEAR
e • e
0 t; a t i ~ .tip yam;"~t•;a re`.T.
i
' 4r
0
t
f',1
Y
A
STREET STUDY RANKINGS 05
Boundaries Street Distress
Street Name From To Costs Points
Los Colinas Mesa IH-35 3,8S3 46
Colonial Augusta Thunderbird 8,667 46
Greenway Augusta Brookhollow 1,4,265 S1
Thunderbird IH-35 Greenway 14,800 56
Lariat Hampton Marshall )2,670 67
Bradley Sena Oak 10,107 40
Mounts Congress Oak 17,334 41
Amarillo Gregg Panhandle-100' 23,112 45
Fallmeadow Hwy.77 Gardenvlew 170334 46
Egan Malone Bolivar 46,223 46
Anna Panhandle University 34,E 7 50
Sunset Anna University 20,23 sl
Highland Elm Welch 30,040 54
Bryn Mawr Hinkle Amherst 11,616 56
• Fonder yak Linden-loll 29,040 S6
J Normal Oak Scripture 8,712 59
Cedar Mulberry McKinney : ,616 68
Mill Pond Emerson Emerson 280890 41
Boyd University Mingo 20,223 44
0
0
C~
s
Davis Ruddell Crawford S,778 44
Robin Circle Nottingham Cul de sac 5,778 44
Ruddell Paisley Willis 6,929 44
Old Lee Court Burning Tree Cul de sac 2,889 46
Audra Mockingbird Loop 288 20,213 47
Cromwell Wellington Yorkshire 11,556 47
'ockingbird Aurda Paisley 20,213 47
Yorkshire Kings Row Sherman Drive 17,334 50
Virginia Hwy. 380 North End 5,778 52
Muckirigbird RR Audra 12,128 52
h'oodfo-1 Court Woodford Dead End 21889 54
Frame hoodland University 5,808 61
Mann Oakland Locust 41356 62
Edgewood Northwood Crestwood 5,808 63
Northwood Ter. Edgewood Cul de sac 5,808 65
Sawyer Oakland Locust 6,534 68
Barrow Westgate Darby 33,787 76
Payne Bonnie Brae IH-35 796,527 77
•
Ilamptoa Marshall Marsh branch 462,964 79
f.1ndy Hwy. 380 Ham ptoii 251,097 95
crook Hollow Greenway End 990815 105
Lovell Scripture Egan 49,908 71
P Roberts Northwood Bell 301,984 73 0
'rexas Ruddell Crawford 74,978 81
J Prairie Avenue E Bonnie Brae 1600120 73
Bonnie Brae FM 1515 Santa Fe Tracks 476,045 75
Roselawn Ft. Worth Drive City Limits 849,918 85
I
• 0
•
r,
4a
4
r
i
S. Locust South End lH-3S 75,083 86
Spencer Woodrow Loop 288 896,255 92
Acme Ft. Worth Drive S. Locust 61,302 94.
Avenue E lh-3S Eagle 42,327 102
Emery Bonnie Brae Malone 34,667 46
10OF Eagle Highland 96,325 110
James Massey Ft. Worth Drive 344,963 125
Total Street Cost for Ranking /5 $5,641,266
2101M
•
e e ,I
a
1
E.
O
B
STREET STUDY SAN3INGS 11
Iaunderles Distress
Street None From To Costs of nnt$
Hlllclost Scripture Emery 47,OL1 60
AreA41 C ,lulberry Oak 1S,798 44
Bolivar Congress University 40,054 44
flags Rov Stuart Shona( 40,445 44
Elm prairie Highland 11699 46
Michelle New Asphalt Hinkle 14,445 47
Ell Congress Oak 26 ill so
Stuart hogs low Coronado $4,667 !a
Its Mulberry Pfeifle' 15,794 SS
Hercules Plcadtlly Sheraton 17,334 SS
Carroll Rot tbrldce Rase 29,040 57
Oak Austin Bolivar 17,424 61
Hercules Redstone Stuart 26,400 62
Stuart Hercules Rings low 23,112 66
Locust Hickory Oak 5,621 42
Withers Oalisnd Mingo 17,334 43
Robinwood Emorsom Unlrersity 54,661 44
totally Woodford Nettle 1,015 4S
Locust Oak McKinney 4,431 46
paisley Frame RuJdsll 13,IS1 A6
First Bolivar Locust 1,667 46
Greenwood Laurel Woad Cherryvaod 40,445 47
elml s low Sher6e6 Yorkshire 23,ILI 49
Me lelblyd ACKIRAey Oriole 100' 24,149 $1
Locust Well ahoy Contrast 15,791 $1
Eaersal Freedom Wllsonvood $6,669 52
Austin Mc$lnney Nulbsrrr 1,666 0
Andre McKinney End of Divide 29,410 34
Locust Mulberry Hickory 5,121 SS
Mln10 Withers Mockingbird 116,160 SI
Old Mort% Road University Will Fond 21,72( S9
Items RAI S. McKinney 11,424 61
Nottingham University Windsor $7,469 62
Greenwood Charrywood Shaman 11,616 64
Locust UnIwitslty Shoran Drive 5,662 64
[is University Conl:mas S5,440 66
Paisley Haltle Ruddsll 41356 66
ferule Mingo WaI~ ne 4,$so 66
McCormick h rvln Wlllowood 17,33/ t9
Aallyhll! Ald1ectest Tennyson 63,157 S1
dissue D Hll~land IH•31 14,445 54
Hohoon, Lane Teasley FM-1830 50,094 56
sonnle Irse RIASy Windsor 397,176 71
lonnle Icme Windsor University 301,IS1 77
lonnte eree Un!verstty Scripvture 199,914 90
Scripture IH•SS lonnle Brat 547,907 49
Wast Oak IK-IS T 207,116 111 1
Hickory Avenue C Donnie Iran 372,479 72
Oat Bolivar Jetoe $61,440 70
Hickory Avenue C Watch 200,547 71
Magnolia Nw Asphalt Bolivar 176,991 74
Bolivar Northridge University 471,6115 7v.
Fry Scripture Oak 313,140 14
51uart Selaa6 Hercules 123,593 74
Rlckory Carroll Cedar 101,041 10
• Watch Mulberry Hickory $3,694 To
Perehln Stuart Was 71,020 $1
Avenue IN-35 Mulberry 156,111 IS
Locust Sherman Orr 473,211 71
Audra Ind of Divide /6111% 61,244 43
4lenwood Windsor L0two lily 317,139 IN
Avenue A Hltklaad McCormick 110,021 11
Aces Whird Fort Worth Dr. 61.302 14
fie Hijklend Is~1t 314,111 li
O tucust Eetle Mu,harry 47,116 ST • 0
West Oak lonnle Icae 16506 $21,201 11
Controls Calling loader !5,116 11
HtcE01, Ceder Austin 116,150 74
?am1toy Lane Dallas Drive RyaA geld 16000,000
Locust Cons To is Unlve.loo6ty 612,011 42
20 OIMIIiie04pavi to 1 Ifloy `~~?I5 Wilma Iebwlld
I a
e
Group Three Band Issue Street Data
REBUILD COSTS RANK
,)Glenwood ;87,739 1
/Locust 473,218 1
Audra (Paisley to Divide) , I
//Paisley 4,356 I
/Pertain 4,356 1
✓Grecnwood 11,616 L
i
Nottingham 57,869 1
/Frame/NRX/S. McKinney 17,424 1
QO)a 17,424 1
O 14 TFot Elf-Re,~ 27 , 720 1
✓ Mingo 116,160 1
/Locust/Eagle/Mulberry 47,916 1
/Locust/Mulberry/i{ickory 5,628 1
/Longress 54,890 1
/Audra 29,480 1
/'Austin/McKinney/Mulberry 8,666 i
✓ Emerson 86,669 1
VMockingbird/McKinney/Oriole 28,889 1 .
""Locust /McKlnney/Congress 15,798 1
/King's Row 23,118 1
0 0 >
i
Q
Group Ili-Bond Issue Street Data
Page 2
January- 22, 1985
" Greemwood 40,445 ]
Locust /Oak/McKInney 4,431 ]
✓ Paisley 13,857 ]
/First A,667 ]
Paisley 8,085 ]
/Robinwood 34,668 ]
Withers 17,334 ]
/Locust/Hickory/Oak 5,628 ]
TOTAL COST FOR RANK 11 $2,130,902.00
/ )cell 86,346 2
Hickory 310,241 2
/Hickory 116,950 2
Linwood 14,520 2
/Cardinal 37,752 2
Walnut 5,808 2
peoArcher Trail 26,136 2
/Histywood 34,676 2
Sycamore 45,067 2
/Churchill/Windsor/Nottingham 20,223
/Foxcroft 40,44S 2
• /Industrial 13,869 2 •
✓Hanover 14044S 2
urchin /Burning Tree/Nottingham 5,778 2
...rr~~...... ,n I s •r~~~ra~ rim G
` y
W
r
iq
i
F 1
Group III Bond Issue Street Data
Page 3
January 22, 1985
A hind 15,020 2
TOTAL COST FOP RANK 12 $767,176.00
r/Locust 682,095 3
./Mistywood 258,709 3
✓ Oriole 108,133 3
✓ wood 29,040 3
✓ Heather 23,232 3
✓ Rockwood 17,424 3
✓ Kayewood 31,944 3
✓Laurelwood 26,136 3
D v e r 11,,59 3
r Iiamsburg 11,556 3
✓ Avon/Stratford/Heather 80667 3
Dunes 14,445 3
/Royal Lane 15,.12 3
0 TOTAL COST FOR RANK 03 $),238,352.00
'✓Cherrywood 87,336 4
✓Woodhaven 95,656 4
d /Rose 429572 4
• 0
Woodland 29,040 4
✓ Crawford 17,424 4
✓ Live Oak 11,556 4
j
Q Q ~r
° d tv~ uu n 7, r
.s
r
e
Group III-Bond Issue Street Data
Page 4
January 22, 1985
,/Third 10,013 4
Bradshaw 17,334 4
✓ Campbell 20,223 4
Palmwood 2,889 4
✓ Pecan 6,935 4
/Frame/RR Tracks/Grove 14,445 4
✓ Austin 28,299 4
TOTAL COST FOR RANK #4 $383,724.OD
,/Texas 74,978 5
✓ Roberts 301,984 5
/Sawyer 6,534
5
✓ Northwood Terrace S,808 S
Edgewood 5,808 5
/Hann 4,356 5
/Frame/Woodland/Univ. S0808 S
✓h'oodford (Circle) Ct. 2,889 S
♦ ✓ Mockingblyd;RR/Audra 12,128 5
/Yorkshire 17,334 5
/Cromwell 11,556 S
♦ ,/Mockingbird 20,213 S
✓ Old Lee Court 2,889 5
✓ Audra 20,213 S
Q t
1
Group III-Bond Issue Street Data
Page S
January 22, 1985
J Robin Circle 5,778 5
✓Boyd 20,223 5
✓Davis 5,778 5
t Mill Pond 28,890 S
TOTAL COST FOR RANX 05 $SS30167.00
2091M
i
I
a
•
i
1 ;
Street Name From To Length
1, Linden Malone Bonnie Bra-e-6 ~0 - Q - ~ow.w«H~S
2. Emery Bonnie BraMalone 0.60__ 06-f ipO~,_
3. Bellmead Emery Thomas 0.20
--___1_q6~ _ 3.___►?_
4' adds;
_,rtrle
teo 64
. Oreenway Augusta Brookhollow 0,29 may-- r }l~,",
56. Scripture Thomas Jagoe 0.90 L~ej~~!--
Neods otrol
7. Stanle H Y
Y Emery Paxhand16 0,50
~;1hr Q /lrPels O r
8. Thunderbird IH-35 Greenway 0.29 -y - -
9. Hillcrest Scripture Emer O.b oy!- 1t ~dPt~~
Y 5 - -
10 Cordell Hillcrest Malone o,- ~--4 "d~
fIPP4._~ r
11, Lariat Hampton Marshall 0,7-~Q~_
12. West Oak Bonnie BraJagoe 0170
13. Thomas Oak Emery ----T- -~Si ; wi f T~ se~_
14. Bonn le Brae Riney Windsor p, 65 -4Jt2eLt~_ s tutor Ileed!~5a~h!N
e0IT
15. Marshall Hwy, 380 Hampton 0.60 - -41 ~"d* t0 fr ~+''rtrr'r
~
16. Bonnie Brae Wiadsor University 0,70 v l,~ir ~Ye~ls .Qr.Ff1 t4i
I V-
17. Payne tforth Leg IH-35 i.
• 18. Hampton Marshall Marsh Branch0,75 Ve
7 f? nd s~~k Nat k,hrf'I( f.• ,vlf Atr~~ r ,r
19. Bonnie Brae UniversityScripture 0,75 vtry ter r " /
20, Cindy Hwy. 300 Hampton 0.55
V& ~f Y 14 -7
I l 'rrALle Ircls
VIN lt' bl ~-1 - lrL~ew~-.~ DI
21. Scripture IH-35 Bonnie Brae 0.50 _._f~~ _ ?f Qo1.~ L~_.Or+ y -
22. West Oak IH-35 Y 0.30 Ma~er'T i 1 erreble 5lA~~ /
° ~Nom'
- rr
/ 21 M+,i~.` QlgraH Sti~+, (4~<<~al ~ H s.ir>~o~
Q or w,da.uk t.t' ~ N euJ c Ovir~.(iy
1
~utV~~~ui ~,,+4t~o ~ki~•.~(~v'•,t~ t fit- ~"9Ar s
~',tl l1 1i '~,i f=1i~ .),{Q L,q~,r S P1o 'FrrAir~ /1lPf~e'!J &67 a-
ti;
• 0
•
J
I
I
ill
I
Poup
Aor
rt~.~o ~X r,~ I
u3~
I
•
.~rr.~an.-..~ ..t' i r rrr~~ilWeW T'.• VY1L..., ' M i ~ ~ 5 1 ,
M ,v x ~f
• d Y ' ~ ~ c R 1 ~ ~~~L t ~ ' ' ic'+iM ~,}{i Mi.~~' T
~ ti
1
I
P
f
i
I
s .
r-
sGND ISSUE STREET DATA
RF,RUILD
Street Name Distress Points
Costs Rank
f
nlenwood 85
387,734 1 ~
Locust 7A
473,218 2 1
Audra P4-D,~w.~x 83
"'~'1~ 578,95] 3 j
sell 80
A6,346 q i2
Hickory 94
310,241 5
Hickory 74
116,950 6
Locust 82
682,095 7 3
Mistywood 70
258,709 8 3
Cherrywood 77
87,338 9 41
T•roodhaven 77
95,656 10 q/
Oriole 145
108,133 11 3
°ose R9
Texas 42,572 12 y
f;2
74,978 13 ~y
Roberts 73
30- - 84 14 5
Total $3,604 81 30
•
o ~ ~ e
• 0 ..K
%
Q
•
w
RO" ISST15 STRREm DATA
gr,RITITT)
Sheet Mame Distress Points Costs Rank
rlenwoorl AS 147,73q 1
T,OCUSL 7n 473,21R 7
Audra 83 578,A51 3
Roll 80 86,346 4
Hickory 94 310,241 5
Hickory 74 116,950 6
Locust 82 682,095 7
,listywood 70 2580709 R
"herrywood 77 87,339 9
!,'oodhaven 77 95,656 10
Oriole 145 108,133 11
loses qo 420572 12
Texas 82 74,978 13
Roberts 73 301,984 14
Total S3, 6041910
• ii~
i
:i
i w
•
l
•
table III t"
i
7
DISTRESS POINTS 40 - 69
iBoundarfee length Street Dralnage Riding Distress Date Lost Rated
I d Street Name Quid. No. From To !Miles Class Costs Costs uaiit Points Mo^ Day Yr.
5 ,Los Colinas I Mesa IM-35 0,05 R44C 3,853 1 46 02/21/84
5Colonia1 1 Augusta lhunderblyd 0115 R34C 8,667 - 1 46
If Bellmeod 1 Emery Thomas 0.20 R34C 11,556 ] 49 12/05/84
6 Greenway 1 Augusta Brookhollow 0.25 R44C 19,265 I 61 02/21/84
d Stanley 1 Emery Panhandle 0,50 R34C 28,889 1 55 y
'SThunderbtrd I IM-35 Greenway 0,25 R44C 19,800 1 56 02121184
14111crest I Scripture Emery OAS R40C 41,018 2 60 12/05184
Lariat S%A.Ak HamptoA Marsh 11 ~a D, 7S pRtb 6 p8/~u t 67
;t ANAA.U elc 2 is ory Oak aa41 0=10 P30C` 5,007 - 40 12/14/84
•
2 Mulberry 2 Elm Bernard 0.40 C36C 24,04 2 40 12/12/84
J Brad Tey 2 Sena Oak 0.25 R26C 10,107 1 40
3 Yellowstone 2 Sun Valley Kings Row 0.30 034C 17,334 - 2 41 11/16/84
• Mounts 2 Congress Oak 0,30 A34C 17,334 - 2 41 12/07/84 •
T Cait 2 Nestway Congress 0.70 R34C 40,445 2 41
Coronado 2 locust sell 0,30 C34C 17,334 3 43 11128184
Page Total $303,933
• b s
O
I ~
•
1
j.
Street Study `
Table III "d 1
Page Two
r. ~
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Name Quid. No. Free To {Mlles [1ss Cafes Costs ualf~tr Points Plu. Day rr.
3 Scripture 2 Jague Bryan 0.20 C3DC ; 10,013 a 44
12/05/84
3 Georgetown 2 Bowling Green University 0.70 030C 35,047 2 44 11/28/84
i
A6vue C 2 Mulberry Oak 0.20 1146,50 15,798 2 44 12/12/84
C2 Alice 2 Congress Egan 0,10 R30C 5,007 - 0 44
/ Bolivar 2 Congress University 0.60 C30C 40,054 4 44
3 Crescent 2 Malone Bolivar 0.90 R44C 69,353 1 44
Xings Row 2 Stuart Sherman 0,70 C30C 40,445 - 1 44 11/06/83
Manhattan 2 Sherman Stuart 0.30 R34C 17,334 2 44
,j Amarillo 2 Gregg Panhandle/lOG' 0.40 A34C 23,112 1 4;
y Avenue B 2 Oak Hickory 0,05 R40C 3,467 1 45
rfollmesdw 2 Hwy, 77 Gardenvlew, 0.30 034C 17,334 • I 46 11128/94
Elm 2 Prairie Highland 0,10 AISC 7,899 2 46
7 Egan 2 Malone Bolivar 0,80 R34C 46,123 1 46
• Magnolia 2 New Asphalt Hinkle 0,25 034C 14,445 47
d Atli$ 2 Redstone Hercules 0,30 R34C 17,334 2 49 11/16/84
Page total 1362,865
_y----•r , - . ...~..W..~-I . JCL.,.. ,
Y O
•
r
•
Street Study
t
Table 111
Page Three
t
_ Bwndarles 1019th Street Drainage Aiding Distress Date Last Rated h
Street Name Quad. No, From _ To Kills Class Costs Cosh all Points Ma. Day Yr.
3 Ector 2 Scripture University 0.80 C40C j 55,478 2 49 12105184
.Z Alice 2 Egan University 0.75 R34C 43,33 2 49
3 Dover 40,5 Sherman Avon 0.15 A44C 11,559 1 49 11/06/83
Anna 2 Panhandle University 0.17 P 34C 54,661 2 50 11/07;x4
Elm 2 Congress Oak 0.30 ASOC 26,588 2 50
headhe 2 hfnkle 6olivar 0.50 034C 28,889 2 51 ll/2P/84
Scripture 2 Thomas Jagoe 0,50 00C 2$,033 - 2 51 MOM
~j Sunset 2 Anna University 0.35 R34C 20,223 1 51
H GoDer 2 Lrdeli Scripture 0.60 R34C 34,667 - 2 52 12/05/84
Stuart 2 Kings Row Coronado 0.60 C34C 34,667 52
• Highland 2 Elm Welch D.60 R.70C 30,040 2 64
Sena 2 Malone Ector 0.35 R34C 20,223 2 55 12/07/84
Elm 2 Mulberry Prairie O.tu A4 SC 15,798 2 55
• / Hercules 2 PieadIIly Sneratoo 0.30 C34C 17,324 1 55 O
S'6ryn Mawr 2 Hinkle Amherst 0.20 P34C 11,616 - 2 S6 11/28/84
i( Denton 2 Crescent Hickory 0.75 R34C 4,350 - I 56
Page Total j4U,466
i
•
o _
r
Street Study
Table III
Page Four
Boundaries Length ;tratt Drainage Riding Distress Date List Ratcd
Street Name Quid. No. _ From To~ (Miles) Cuss Casts Costs Quality Points No. Day Yr. }
y Mimosa 2 Bolivar Hinkle 0.55 R34C 31,944 2 56
Pander 2 Pak linden 61 DO' 0.50 R34C 29,040 1 66
Carroll 2 Northridge post 0.50 A36C ",040 2 57 11/28/84
Denison 2 Sherman Headlee 0.40 R34C 23,232 5g
Normal 2 Oik Scripture 0.15 R34C 8,712 2 59
3 Denison 2 Sherman University 0.10 A34C 5,808 2 60
Emery 2 Fult.un 6200' Carroll 0.36 R34C 20,32e - 2 co
scripture 2 Bryan Ponder 0.10 C40S 7,234 - 2 F1 12/05/84
Fry 2 Cak Hiclory 0.10 R34C 5,808 61
Oak 2 Austin Bolivar 0.20 A50C 17,4A 2 61
•
Hercules 2 Redstone Stuart 0.2s C60C 20,400 1 62
Stuart 2 l rcules Kings Raw 0.40 C34C 23,112 66
Ceder 2 Mulberry McKinney 0.20 R34C 11,616 2 68
It 3 westray 2 Bolive, F0 ton 0.45 434C 26,136 2 69 O
Mill Pond 3 Em.,s;n rmerson 0.50 R34C 28'890 1 41 12/20/03
Page Total j294,724
o a
i
•
o
Street Study
i
Table III
Page Ffvw
i
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date List Rated
Strtet Name Quid, NO. From To (M17e0 Clsss Costs Casts Quality PaInts Mo. Day Yr.
/ locust 3 Hickory Oak 0.05 A63C S,628 2 42
y Third Bolivar locust 0.30 R25C 15,020 - 1 43
f Withers 3 Oakland Mingo 0,30 134C 17,334 - 1 43
S Boyd 3 University Mingo 0.35 R34C 20,223 1 14 11/01/84
i
Davis 3 Ruddell Crawford 0.10 934C 5,778 1 44 11/01/84
~j Royai Line 3 Mistywood Rockwood 0.20 WC 15,412 1 44 11109/84
l Robinwood 3 Emerson University 0.60 A34C 34,668 - 2 44 11/02/84
Austin 3 Oakland Parkway 0.70 125C 28,299 - 1 44
3 Avon 3 Stratford Heather 0.15 R34C 8,661 - 2 44 11/08/83
Churchill 3 Burn tree Nottingham 0,10 R34C 5,778 44 11/29/83
Dunes 3 Windsor Old Orchard Rd 0.25 R34C 14.44S 1 44 11/29/93
10
T Prase 3 RA Tracks Grove 0.25 134C 14.445 - 1 44
Pobin Circle 3 Nottinghae Cul de sac 0.10 R34C 5,718 - 1 44
Ruddell 3 Paisley Willis 0.20 C225 6,929 - 4 44
7 Paimwood 3 Glenwood Rayewood 0.05 034C 2,889 - 1 45 11102184
J Paisley 3 Woodford Nettle 0.20 C24S 0,085 3 45 11/01/84
Page Total ;209,378
i
r ~
0
/
•
Street Study
Table 111
Page Six
1oundarfes length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last sated
Street Nase ~Quad. No. From To (Miles) Class Costs Costs alit Paints Mo. Dart Yr. r
4 Campbell 3 McKinney Paisley 0.35 R34C 20,223 1 45 11/01/84
Hanover 3 Windsor Gerson 0.25 434C 14,445 - 1 45 12120183
Z Industrial 3 Hickory Be11 0,20 140C 13,869 1 45
Pecan 3 Cedar Austin 0.10 R4DC 6,935 2 45
Old Lee Ct. 3 Burning tree Cu) de sac 0,05 A34C 2,889 3 46
11/09/84
1 locust 3 Oak McKinney 0,05 A50C 1,431 3 46
j Paisley 3 Frame Auddell 0.40 C22S 13,857 - 2 46 11/01/84
Audra 3 MoCkingbfrd loop 288 0.50 C253 20,213 3 16
11/D2/84
rf Bradshaw 3 Paisley McKinney 0,30 R34C 17,334 1 46
j First 3 Bolivar locust 0.15 A34C 8,667 - 1
• $ Williamsburg 3 Nottingham Jamestown 0.20 134C 11.556
2 Ib
1. Foscroft 3 Emerson Emerson 0.70 A34C 40,445 - 1 47 11102184
Crwnwe11 3 Wellington Yorkshire 0.20 134C 11,556 - 2 41 11/16/84
• Greenwood 3 Laurel Wood Cherrywocd 0.70 134C 40,445 2 47
b Mockinghlyd 3 Audra Paisley 0.50 C25S 20,213 47
Y Live Oak 3 Sherman Rob IrrAod 0.20 134C 11,556 2 48 11/36/84
I! Third 1 Locust Oakland 0.20 A30C 10,013
- 48
Page Total $268,647
•
Q I
•
I
i
I
I
I
Street Study
Table III
Page Seven
_ i
i
I
8oundarfes Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Name Quid. No. from To (Miles) Class Costs Costs -Quality Pofntt No, Day Yr. j
1 Kings Row 3 Sherman Yorkshire 0.30 C44C ; 23,118 49 11/08/83
Yorkshire 3 Kings Row Sherman Drive 0,30 AMC 17,334 - 1 SO 11/08/83
j Mockingbird 3 McKinney Oriole 100' 0.50 A34C 28,869 1 61
j Locust 3 McKinney Congress 0.20 A45C 15.798 - 2 51
35
l Emerson 3 Freedom 10116onwood 1.50 R34C 86,669 2 52 11102/84
Yfrglntt 3 Hwy, 380 North End 0.10 R34C 5,178 - 3 52 11/16/84
Churchill 3 Windsor Nottingham 0,35 R34C 20,223 - 1 52 11129183 l
O Mot Dfrd RR Audra 0.30 C155 12,128 52
Od 3 RR Austin 0,30 ASSC 26,480 - 2 52
• Austin 3 McKinney Mulberry 0.15 R34C 8,666 2 53
Woodford Ct. 3 Woodford Dead end 0,05 R34C 2,889 - 2 54 11/01/84
/ Audra 3 McKinney End of Divide 0.30 CSSC 29,480 - 1 54
f Locust 3 Mulberry NJckcry 0.05 ASOC 5,628 2 65
• ,Z Mlstywood 3 Nottingham Woodhaven 0.45 A44C 34,616 2 65
Archer Trail 3 Emerson Emerson 0.45 A34C 26.136 - 1 56 12120183
hge Total $343,092
i
i
Islas
•
•
/
•
Street Study
Table 111
Pale Eight
Y
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Name Quad, No. _ From To CMilea Class Costs Costs 44ality Pofnts Mo. Day Tr.
3 laurelwood 3 Kayewood University 0.45 A34C 26,136 - 2 58 w
Mingo 3 Withers Mockingbird 2.20 A3DS 116,160 2 68
3 Old North Road 3 University Mill Pond 0.35 C44C 27,720 1 59 12/20/83
a Cardinal 3 McKinney End 0.65 A34C 37,752 3 60 11/02/84
y Walnut 3 Austin Cedar 0.10 A34C 5,808 2 60
Frame 3 VAX S. McKinney 0.30 034C 17,424 2 61
Frame 3 Woodland University 0.10 034C 6,808 2 61
>!j Hann 3 Oakland locust 0.10 0250 4,356 • 2 62
3? Kayewood 3 Crestwood 6reemmod 0.55 R34C 31,944 2 62
• / kattingham 3 University Windsor 0180 A40C 57,869 - 2 62
J5 Edgewood 3 Northwood Crestwood 0.10 934C 5,808 - 1 63
Q Rockwood 3 Emerson Leurelwood 0.30 R34C 17,424 1 64 11/02184
Crawford 3 Texas McKinney 0.30 114C 17,424 2 64
• 1 Greenwood 3 Cherrywood Sherman 0.20 A34C 11,616 - 2 64
Linwood 3 Sherman Crestwood 0.25 A34C 14,526 - 2 64
{ locust 3 University Sherman Or. 0.10 A34C 6,662 2 64
Heather 3 Stratford Oxford 0.40 A34C 23,232 - 2 65 11/16/84
Page Total 5426,663
MEMNON
e
0
Street Study
Table Ill
Page Wlne
Boundaries Length Street Drainage kidlr3 Distress Date List Rated
Street Name Quad, No. From To Miles Class Costs Colts Quality Polnts 11o. Day Yr.
< Northwood Ter 3 Edgewod Cul de sac 0,10 R34C 5,808 - 1 55 ?
`E10 3 University Congress 0,10 A45C $5,440 2 66
1 Paisley 3 4ettfI Auddell 0.10 C24S 4,356 - 2 66 11/01/84
/ Pertain 3 It Ingo Wayne 0.10 A25S 4,356 2 66 11/01/84
locksley 3 Ererson Nottingham 0.25 034C 14,520 1 67 12/20/83
3 Wood 3 McKinney Texas 0.50 134C 29,040 2 67
S Sawyer 3 Oakland Locust MIS 025C 6,534 1 6a
a~ Woodland 3 Cherrywood Sherman 0.60 934C 29,040 - 2 69
R Central 4 Eagle Highland 0.15 134C 8,661 - 1 40 12/12/84
/2 Dudley 4 McCorelck Jacqueline 0,10 A34C 5,778 - 1 40 12/14/64 f
• f
r~ Oakwood 4 Mercedes Cul de sac 0.10 R34C 5,178 - 2 40 12/14/84
McCorwlck 4 Nfllowood IN-35 0,65 R34C 37,556 2 40 12114/84
w~. wisteria 4 Willowwood Golf 0.10 034C 5,178 2 40 12114/84
• a Chasewood 4 Peadrooke Woodbrook 0.10 134C 5,778 1 40 0
gR Kendolph 4 W111uwood IM-35 0.50 034C 28,890 - 2 41 12/14/84
99 Collier 4 IN-35 Eagle 0,30 A34C 17,334 1 41 12/12/84
Savannah 4 Teasley longridge 0.40 134C 23,112 - 2 43 12/26/84
Page Total 1287,765
• 0 r~
e
b
O
r
I
I
"w
Street Study ,
Table III
Page Ten
f8oundarles length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated V
Street has Quad. No, Fro, To (Miles) Class Costs Costs Quality Points Mo. Day Tr.
i
/Z Welch 4 Eagle Highland 0.15 C4DC f 10,402 2 43 1202/64
Woodbrook 4 Pennsylvania IH-35 0.60 R44C 61,647 2 44 12/28/84
a,Willowood 4 McCormick Bernard 0.30 C22S 10,393 3 44 12/14/84
Z Travers 4 Hopkins Drive Piping Rock 0.05 A34C 2,889 - 1 44 10111/83
w111owood 4 Bonnie Brie Highland Park 0.40 C25S 14.170 - 2 45 12/14/84
Westwood 4 Parvin Willowwood 0,35 034C 20,223 - 1 45
R Ridgecrest 4 Pennsylvania Aidgecrest 1.80 A34C 104.002 - 2 46 12/28/84
i
Ot Myrtle 4 Daugherty Collins 0.25 034C 14,445 - 2 47
'Z Jacqueline 4 Parvin Willowwood 0.40 134C 23,112 - 1 49 1211404
McCOrvick 4 Parvin Willowood 0,30 R34C 17,334 2 49 12/14/84
•
1 Hollyh111 4 Ridgecrest Tennyson 1.10 R34C 63.557 2 51 12/28/84
Wilshire 4 Avenue C Avenue D 0.10 R34S 6,778 - 2 S4 12112184
Avenue D 4 Highland iH•?5 0.25 034C 14,445 - 2 64
0 y Avenue B 4 Maple Underwood 0.30 R30C 15,020 2 65 O
Carden Ct. 4 Londonderry Cul de sac 0.05 034C 2,889 B 6S
v2 Willow Springs 4 Shady Oaks Kerley 0.20 C34C 111556 t 55
{
Page Total $393,662
1
y i
- ex
j
11I
• I
r
{
i
Ia
Street Study j
Table IN
Page Eleven
o
i
Street NaaK Boundarfes tengtA Street Drainage Riding Dtstrass gate last Rated
wd. No. From To (Miles) Class Costs Costs Quality Points Mo. Day Yr.
1 Hobson tine 4 Teasley FM-1830 1.15 C25S 50.094 2 56
'I
7 So. Locust 4 I4 35 tagle 0.10 R2SS 4.356 - 3 50
Pembrooae 4 longrldge Fairfax 0.65 R34C 17.752 - 3 62 12/28/84
3 Bernard 4 N111owood }H•35 0.10 R36C 5,808 - 3 65
a~ Bernard 4 Hickory Eagle 0.50 A30C 37.680, t 68
linden 1,2 Malone Bonnie Brae 0.35 C44C 46,13T; t
y 46 12/07/81
0.26
Lmery 1.2 Bonnie Brae Malone 0.35 A34C 34.667 0Vqe 1 46 12/07/84
0, 25 ~
1ordell 1,2 Hl llcrest Malone 0,10 R14C 7,920 2 61 I2/05/04
y 0.30 23,760
• -FASycanore t.3 Welch
Be}1 O~bJ C30C 251031 1 54 1tl14/84
0.30 20,030
JyCongress 2.3 Oakland Ponder 0.5 C34C 3 .941 t 69
l 0.20 23.232
• Locust 3.4 Eagle Mulberry 0`20 A54C i- wa 2 67
0.30 28.760
Page Total 1390,431
i
1;
•
a
•
Table IV
DISTRESS POINTS 70 -
Multi)
Boundaries- Length Street Drainage MICRO Distress Total + 165
Street Hue Quad. No. Froo To Wiles Cljss Costs Costs
~L a1f Points Eng, and Cant.
,~3Tnomas 1 Oat Emery 0.65 P34C $329,101 30,225 2
73 (I {13,225
1 Bonnie Brae I Riney Windsor 0,65 C2i5 345,979 0 3
is 307.876
Barrow 1 Westgate Darby 0,10 134C 29,380 0 4
• 76 33,78)
3 Narshall I Hwy. 380 Hampton 0.60 AM 266,280 21,238 2 76
330,646
Bonnie Brae 1 Windsor University 0.70 C25S 247,824
14,00 3 77 301,55)
S PayM I Bonnie Brae EH-35 1,20 A20S $72,502 120,130 3 77 ?96,627
• j Hampton 1 Narshall marsh Branch O.J6 025S 350,602 61,980 2 79 462,964 i •
Bonnie Brae 1 University Scripture 0.75 C45S 372,9;0 409,625 3
90 899,984
s Cindy I Hwy. 380 Hampton 0.55 A26S 192,605
25,740 t 95 251.09)
Page Total f3,88),6G3
0
a
e
Street Study
Table tv
Page Two
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total • 154
Street Name Quid. No. From To Miles Class Costs Costs Quality Points End. and Cont.
/ Scripture 1 CH-35 Bonnie Brae 0.50 0225 226,338 76,190 3 99 f 347,907
Brook Hollow 1 Greenway End 0.10 A34C 86,796 0 1 105 99,815
West Oak 1 IH-35 T 0.30 A64C 156,612 24,250 4 114 207,076
/ Nest cat 1,2 Bonnie Brae Jagoe 0.45 A36C 221,795 21LI 4 2 71 321,295
0.25 15,536 0 0
Hickory 1,2 Avenue C Bonnie Brae 0.40 A45C 323,895 2 72 372,479
1.30
/ O)ak 2 Bolivar Jagoe 1.00 135 336,334 91,800 2 70 461,440
3 Pearl 2 Denton Carroll 0110 A34C 39,781 0 1 70 45,749
S Lovell 2 Scripture Egan 0.10 A34C 43,398 0 2 71 49,908
( Hickory 2 Avenue C Welch 0.40 A36C 140,263 26,125 3 72 200,547
• / Magnolia 2 New Asphalt Bolivar 0.30 A34C 108,495 45,410 2 74 176,991
/ Bolivar 2 Northridge University 0.70 034C 260,388 149,212 2 76 471,615
/ Fry 2 Scripture Oak 0.20 134C 77,755 21,150 2 78 113,740
/ Stuart 2 Selene Hercules 0.30 107,474 0 IN 123,595
•
Hickory 2 Carroll Cedar 0.10 A36C 73,227 18,160 ! 79 105,045
/ Ne1ch 2 Mulberry Hickory 0110 27e 31,066 15,625 79 53,494
Pershing 2 Stuart Atlas 0.20 034C 64,113 0 1 97 19.020
Page Total 13,230,716
•
p
•
i
•
w
Street Study
Table IV
Page Three ^~.1
8e.1d4ries length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Total • 1S%
Street Wane Quad. No. From To Milos [lass tests Costs Qua 11ty Points Eng. and Cont.
Hickory 2,3 Cedar Austin 0.05 A63C 101,695 2 14 116,950
1 0.15
! Avenue C 2,4 1H-35 Mulberry 0.30 CSSC 419,347 m775 2 85 $56,181
0.40 37,035
3 Nistywood 3 Woodhaven Robinwood 0,20 044C 107,965 117,000 2 70 258,709
,dt7 Roberts 3 Northwood Bell 0.35 R34C 141,043 127,552 2 73 301,984
s Cherrywood 3 Greenwood Woodland 0.20 R34C 75,946 0 2 77 87,338
Y Woodhaven 3 Mfstywood [person 0.30 R34C 83,179 0 2 77 95,656
Locust 3 She,-marl Orr 0.55 A34Y 306,718 104,775 3 79 473,218
Bell 3 University Sherpan 0.30 C31C• 75'083 0 3 80 86,346
S Texas 3 Ruddell Crawford 0.05 AM 39,174 49,650 3 e2 14,918
• ! Audra 3 End of Divide M c In9 rd 1.00 ?7f-,i49 l2?;9BB 87 4i91697
Glenwood 3 Wfndsor Univeo.fty 0.70 034C 264,004 73,160 2 85 387,739
4 Rose 3 Paisley Teals 0.15 A25S 31,014 0 ! 89 42,512
Hickory 3 Austin RR 0,30 ASSC 182,326 87,450 2 94 310,241
O
3 Oriole 3 Mockingblyd Cardinal 0,35 R34C 94,029 0 3 145 108,133
Locust 3 Congress University 0.70 A31C 404,176 183,350 82 682,095
a>~Profile 4 Avenue E Bonnie brae 0,45 R34C 139,235 0 2 73 360,120
Page Total X4,321,7}1
S
+a
I
. . 61
Street Study
Table IV
tP
Page Four
1
1
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total + 152
Street Nave Quad. No. From To (M1 }as) Class Coats Cnsts Quality Points in. and Cont.
Avenue A 4 Highland McCormfck 0.5S 034C 182,633 0 2 75
/ 3 2}0,028
58"M11 Brae 4 FM 1515 Santa Fe Tracks 0.80 R25S 338,617 75,335 3 75 476,04S
! XinIJswood 4 Londonderry Cul de sac OAS R34C 18,082 0 2
75 20,T9i
3 Maple 4 Avenue 0 Bernard 0.70 434C 251,346 0 2 83 289,048
5 Roselawn 4 Ft. Worth Dr. City Lfrlts 1.35 R25S 601, 669 137,398 2 85 849,928
`J S. Locust 4 SouM End IN 35 0.20 A25S 65,290 0 2 86 ?5,D83
r
.l Spencer i Woodrow A Loop 288 1.40 A25S 572,501 206,850 2 92 896,265
1 14 C4WA4 01 S'At j 8 ~d5.flflat •
feawuMd~ej . Locust 0.25 R26S 81,612 25,000 t 94
. ii3et
M
<Avenue E 4 IH 35 Eagle 0.05 C34C 36,806 0 2 102 42,321
6 Iov 4 Eagle Highland 0,15 425S 83,761 0 3 110 96,326
•
S1aaKa 4 Massey Ft, Worth Dr. 0.70 A25S 241,513 SB,39S 4 125 341,963
Elm 4 Highland Eagle 0.15 A41C 93,242 180,250 BS 314.516
Page Total $3,731,916
q
s
n
0
•
a;
Table fII
DISTRESS POINTS 40 t9
_Boundaries _ Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Name Quid. No. From io (miles) Class Costs Cosh Quality Points Mo. Day Yr.
Los Colinas 1 Mesa IH-35 0.05 R44C 3,853 - 1 46 02/21184
Colonial 1 Augusta Thunderbird 0,15 034C 8,667 1 46
Bellmead I Emory ihoma1 0.20 R34C 11,556 - 3 49 12/05/84
Creerwvy I Augusta Brookhollow 0.25 R44C 19,265 1 $1 02/21/64
Stanley I Emery Panhandle 0.50 034C 28,889 1 55
Thunderbird 1 IH-35 Oreenway 6,25 R44C 19,800 1 S6 02/21/84
Hlllcrest 1 Scripture Emery 0.6S R4DC 41,018 - 2 60 12/05/84
Lariat 1 Hampton Marshall 0.75 R26S 32,670 1 61
Welch 2 Hid ory Oak 0.10 R30C 5,007 40 12/14/84
I Mulberry 2 110 Bernard 0.40 C36C 24,654 2 40 12/12/84
Bradley 2 Sana Oak 0.25 025C 10,107 1 40
Yellowstone 2 S n Valiey kings Row 0.30 R34C 17,334 - 2 41 11/16184
O Mounts 2 Congress Oak 0.30 034C 17,134 - 2 41 12/01/44
Colt 2 Nestway Congress 0.70 R34C 40,445 - 2 41
Coronado 2 Locust poll 0.30 C34C 11,134 3 47 I1128184
Page total $3rJ,933
•
4D
i
i
Street Study
table 111
Pape Two
Street Name Quid. Boundarfes Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated
No. From To (Miles) Class Data Casts alit 20-n I. Mo, Day Tr, -Qq Scripture 2 Jagoe Bryan 0,?0 C30C { 10,013 -
2 44 12/05/84
Georgetown 2 Cowling Green University 0,70 R3DC 35,047 2 44 11/28/84
Avenue C 2 Mulberry Oak 0.20 046.50 15,798 2 44 12/12/84
Alice 2 Congress Egan 0.10 R3DC 5,007 0 44
Bolivar 2 Congress University 0.80 C30C 40,054 4 44
Crescent 2 Malone Bolivar 0.90 R44C 69,353 1 44
Rings pow 2 Stuart Sherman 0,70 63DC 40,445 1 44 11/06/83
Manhattan 2 Sherman Stuart 0.30 034C 17,334 - 2 44
1 A"a f I I a 2 Gre g Panhandle/100' 0,40 R34C 23,112 - 1 45
• Avenue B 2 Cak hickory 0,05 ROC 3,467 1 45
iallneIdow 2 Hwy. 77 Gardenvlew 0.30 034C 17,334 - 1 46 11/28/84
Elm 2 Prairie Highland 0.10 A45C 7,E9g 2 46
Egan 2 Malone 8olfvar 0.80 R34C 46,223 - 1 46
• Magnolia 2 New Asphalt Hfnkle 0.25 134C 14,445
41
Alfas 2 Redstone Hercules 041) R34C 17,334 2 49 11/16184
page Total $362,665
ID O
I
• I
ca
•
•
Street Study
Table III
Page Three
_ Boundaries _ Length Street 0ratnege Aiding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Nave Quad. No. From To (Mllesl Class Costs- Cots ue11tY Points Mo. DeY Yr.
Etter 2 Scripture University 0,60 C4CC f $5,478 2 49 12105184
Alice 2 Egan University 0.75 434C 43,334 2 49
Dover 2 Sherman Avon 0.15 R44C 11,559 1 49 11108/83
Anna 2 Panhandle University 0.60 134C 34,667 2 50 12/07184
Elm 2 Congress Oak 0,30 A50C 26,588 2 50
Headlee 2 Hinkle Bolivar O.SO A34C 28,889 2 61 11128184
Scripture 2 Thomas Jagoe 0160 C30C 25,033 2 51 12/05/64
Sunset 2 Anna UntreraIty 0.35 134C 20,223 1 51
Gober 2 Cordell Scripture 0.60 A34C 34,667 - 1
! 62 1!/DS/B/
Stuart 2 Kings Pow Coronado 0.60 C34C 34,667 52
•
Highland 2 Elm Welch 0.60 A30C 30,040 2 54
Sena 2 Malrne Etter 0.35 A34C 20,223 - 2 65 11/07/84
Elm 2 Mulberry Prairie 0.20 A45C 15,798 - ! 55
• Hercules 2 Picadilly Sheraton 0.30 C34C t7,334 1 SS 0
6ryn Mawr 2 Hinkle Amherst 0.20 A34C 11,616 2 56 11/26/64
Denton 2 Crescent Illckory 0175 A34C 1.3x,0 I 56
Page Total 1414,466
•
4a
•
1
I
I
i
i
i
I
I
Street Study
Table III
Page Four
I
i
_ Boundaries Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Date Litt Rated
Street None Quad. No. Fro _ To (Niles) Class Costs Cuts uitl Points No.
Mimosa 2 Bolivar Mlnkle 0.55 A34C 1 31,944 2 56
Ponder 2 Oak linden 8100' 0.50 134C 29,040 1 56
Carroll 2 Northridge poll 0.50 A36C 29,040 - 2 57 ITY20/84
Denison 2 Sherman Meadlee 0.40 034C 23,232 59
Normal 2 Oak Scripture 0,15 R34C 8,712 - 2 59
Denison 2 Sherman University D.10 R34C 5,808 2 60
Emery 2 Fulton 1200' Carroll 0,35 R34C 20,328 2 60
Scripture 2 Bryan Ponder 0.10 C4DS 1,234 2 6t 12/05/84
Fry 2 Oak Hickory 0.10 R34C 6,808 61
Oak 2 Austin Bolivar 0.20 ASOC 17,424 2 61
• Hercules 2 Redst0Me Stuart 0.25 C60C 26,400
1 62
Stuart 2 Hercules Kings Aunt 0.40 04C 73,112 66
Ceder 2 Mulberry McKinney 0.20 R34C 11,616 2 68
• lie Itoly 2 Bolivar Fulton 0.45 R34C 26,136 2 69 •
Milt Pond 3 Emerson Emerson 0150 R34C 28,890 1 41
Page Total 1294,724
0
4a
i
e ~
I
I
1
{
~ I
Street Study
Table III
Page Fives
D
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date Last Rated
Street Mane Quad, No. Froal To (Miles Class Costs Cotta Quality Points Ma. Day Tr.
a.
Locust 3 Hickory Oak 0.05 A63C ~ S,62B 2 12
Third 3 Bolivar Locust 0.30 A25C 15,020 i 43
Withers 3 Oakland Mingo 0.30 A34C 11,334 - 1 43
Boyd 3 University Mingo 0.35 ANC 20,223 1 44 11/01/84
Davis 3 Auddell Cravf>rd 0110 R34C 5,778 1 44 11/01/84
Royal Lane 3 Mistywood Rockwood 0.20 R44C 15,412 1 44 11/09/84
Aobinwood 3 Cnerson University 0.60 A34C 34,668 - 2 44 11102184
Austin 3 Oakland Parkway O.7D 025C 28,299 1 44
Avon 3 Stratford Neither 0,15 A34C 8,667 2 44 11/06/83
Churchill b Burn free Nottingham 0,10 034C 5,718 - 44 11/29/83
Dunes 3 Windsor Old Orchard Ad 0,2S ANC 14,445 - 1 44 1112916?
Frank 3 All Tracks Grove 0.25 ANC 14,445 - 1 44
Robin Circle 3 Nottingham Cul de sac 0.10 R34C 5,778 1 44 0
•
Ruddell 3 Palsley Willis 0.20 0225 6,929 4 44
/ Palmwood 3 Glenwood Kayewood O,OS 034C 1,889 1 45 11/02/61
Pa lsley 3 Woodford kettle 0,20 C241 61085 3 IS 11/01/84
Page Total 1209,318
„I
•
45
I
I
i
J
I
I
I
Street Study
Table III
Page Six
t.
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Date List Rated
Street Name Quid. No. From To Miles C1 ass Costs Costs Quality Points Mo. Day Yr.
Campbell 3 McKinney Paisley 0,35 AJ4C 20,!23 - 1 45 11/01/84
Hanover 3 Windsor Emerson 0.25 034C 14,445 1 45 12120183
Industrial 3 Hickory Bell D,20 140C 13,869 1 45
Pecan 7 Cedar Austin 0.10 R40C 6,935 - ! 45 I
Old Lee Ct. 3 Burning Tree Cut do sec 0,05 034C 2,889 - 3 46 11/09/84
Locust 3 Oak McKinney O.OS ASOC 4,431 3 46
Paisley 3 Frame Auddell 0.40 C22S 13,853 - 2 46 11101/64
Audra 3 Mockingbird Loop 288 0.50 C25S 20,213 3 46 11102184 !
Bradshaw 3 Paisley McKinney 0.30 134C 17,334 I 46
First 3 Bolivar Locust 0.15 034C 6,667 7 46
• W1111amsburg 3 Nottingham Jamestown 0.20 034C 11,856 i
- ! 46
Foacroft 7 Emerson Eeernm 0,70 R14C 40,445 - ! 47 11102184
Cromwell 3 Wellington Yorkshire 0.20 134C 11,656 - ! 47 11/16/04
• Greenwood 3 Laurel Wood Cherrywoud 0.70 A34C 40,445 2 11 •
Mockingb0 d 3 Audri Paisley 0,50 C25S 20,213 17
live Oak 7 Sherman Robinwood 0,20 134C 11,656 - 2 48 11/16/84
Third 3 Locust Oakland 0,20 1300 10,011 48
Page Total =268,64?
j
• O ?M
0
•
•
Street Study
Table III
Page Seven
Boundaries _ Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date test Rated
Street Wax Quad. No. From _ To {Miles Class Cots Costs all Points Mo. Day Yr.
Kings Now 3 Sherman Yorkshire 0.30 C44C 3 23,118 - 49 11/08/83
Yorkshire 3 Kings Pow Sherman Drive 0.30 A34C 11,334 - 1 50 11/08/83
Mockingbird 3 McKinney Oriole 100' 0.50 034C 28,889 1 61
Locust 3 McKinney Congress 0.20 A45C 15,198 2 51
35
Emerson 3 Freedom Wllaonwooo 1.50 934C 86,669 2 52 11/02/84
Virginia 3 Hwy, 380 North End 0.10 A34C 6,778 3 52 11/16/84
Churchill 3 Windsor Nottingham 0.35 A34C 20,223 - 1 52 11/29/83
Nxkinn,Lird 3 RA Audri 0.30 C25S 12,128 62
Oak 3 AA Austin 0,30 ASSC 26,480 2 52
• Austin 3 McKinney Mulberry 0,16 A34C 8,666 2 63
Woodford Ct. 3 Woodford Oead end 0.05 134C 2,889 2 54 11/01/84 1
Aud+a 3 McKinney End of Divide 0,30 cm 29,480 1 64
Locust 3 Mulberry Hickory 0,05 ASOC 5,628 2 65
O O
Mistywood 3 Nottinghem Woodhaven 0,45 A44C 34,616 - 2 55
Archer Trail 3 Emerson Emerson 0.45 034C 26,134
1 66 1220/83
Page Total $343,892
•
45
s
•
t'
Street St-jdy
Table 111
Page Eight
8ounderles
Street Nerve Length Street Drainage Riding Oistress Date Lest Rated fi
road. No. Eras To (Kilts) Class Costs- torts alit Points Mo. :av Yr.
tourelwood 3 Kayewood University 0,45 034C ; 26,136 2 58
Mingo 3 Withers Mockingbird 2,70 R305 116,160 2 S8
Old North Road 3 University Kill Pond 0.35 C44C 21,720 - 1 59 12/20/83
Cardinal 3 McKinney End D.65 A34C 37,752 3 60 11/02/84
Walnut 7 Auttln Cedar 0.10 P34C 5,808 Y 60
Frame 3 RRK S. McKinney 0,30 R34C 17,424 - 2 61
Frame 3 Woodland University 0,10 R34C 5,608 - Y 61
Mann 3 Oakland Locust 0,10 02SC 4,356 2 62
Kayewood 3 Crestwood Greenwood 0.55 R34C 31,944 2 6t
Nottingham 3 University Windsor 0.60 A40C 67,669 t 62
fdgewood 3 Northwood Crestwood 0,10 034C 5,808 - I 63
Rockwood 3 Emerson Laurelwood 0.30 134C 17,424 1 64 11/0!/64
Crawford 3 Texas McKinney 0.30 134C 11,424 t 64
• Greenwood 3 Cherrywood Sharman 0,20 034C 11,616 Y 64
Linwood 3 Shermah Crestwood 0.25 R34C 14,520 t 64
locust 3 University Sherwin Dr, 0.10 A34C 5,661 - ! 64
Neither 3 Stratford oxford 0,40 R34C Y3,t3t t 65 11/16/64
Page Total ~42b,b63
4
e
0
•
•
C
Street Study
Table Ili
Page Nine
Boundaries length Street Drainage Riding Distress Date lest Rated
Street Name Quid. No. _ From To, Mlles [Iss Losts Cots Quality Points Mo. Day Yr.
Northwood Ter 3 Edgewood Cul de sac 0.10 R34C 5,808 7 65
Elm 3 University Congress 0.70 A4SC 55,440 2 66
Paisley 3 Nettie Ruddell 0.10 C24S 4,356 2 66 11/01/84
Pertain 3 Mingo Wayne 0.10 R25S 4,356 - Y 66 11/01/34
locksley 3 Emerson Nottingham 0.25 P34C 14,520 1 67 12120183
Wood 3 McNlnney Texas 0.50 034C 29,040 - 2 67
Sawyer 3 Oakland locust 0.15 P25C 6,534 - 1 68
Woodland 3 Cherrywood Sherman 0.50 P34C 29,040 - 2 69
Central 4 Eagle Highland 0.15 A34C 8,667 1 40 12/12/84
Dudley 4 Mc Cormlck Jac Quellne 0.10 R34C 5,778 1 40 12/14184
•
Oakwood 4 Mercedes Cu) to sac 0.10 P34C 6,778 - 2 40 12/14/64
NcCoripick 4 Nlllowwo0d IH-35 0.65 934C 37,656 - 2 40 12114/84
Nisterls 4 W111anood Golf 0.10 R34C 6,778 - 2 40 12/14/84
• Chesewood 4 Pembrooke Woodbrook 0.10 R34C 5,778 - 1 40 0
Randolph 4 Wlllowwood I8-35 0.50 R34C 28,890 - 2 41 12/14/84
Collier 4 IN-]$ Eagle 0.30 R34C 17,334 - I 41 0/I2/84
Savannah 4 Teasley longridge 0.40 034C 23.112 2 43 12128184
Page Total f2B7,76S
1
Gf
•
1
a
•
I
Street Study j
table 101
Page Ten
I
_ Boundsrles _ Ltngth Street Drainage Riding Dtstress Date Last Rated
Street Name um d. No, -From To _ M!1el Class Costs Costs ua11t Points No. Day tr
1
Welch 4 Cagle Highland 0.15 C40C [i 10,402 - 2 43 12/12/04
Woodbrook 4 Pennsylvania IN-35 0.60 R44C 61,647 - 2 44 12/28/84
W111owood 4 McCormick Bernard 0.30 C22S 10,393 - 3 44 12/14/84
Travers 4 Hopkins Drive Piping Rock 0.05 R34C 2,889 1 44 10/11/83
Wlllowwcod 4 Bonnie Brae Highland Part 0.40 C265 16,170 2 45 12/14/84
Westwood 4 Parvln Willowood 0.35 R34C 20,223 1 45
Aidgecrest 4 Pennsylvania Rtdgecrest 1.80 R34C 104,002 - 2 46 12128/64
Myrtle 4 Daugherty Collins 0.25 A34C 14,445 2 47
Jacqueline 4 Parvln Wlllowood 0.40 R34C 23,112 - 1 49 12/14/84
McCormick 4 Parvtn W111ewobd 0.30 R34C 17,334 2 49 12/14/64
Holiyhill 4 Aidgecrest Tennyson 1.10 034C 63,552 2 ST 12/28/84
Wilshire 4 Avenue C Avenue 0 0,10 R34S 5,776 2 54 12/12/84
Avenue 0 4 Highland I4-35 0.25 A34C 14,445 - 2 54
Avenue B 4 Maple Underwood 0,30 AMC 15,020 - 2 55 •
Camden C t. 4 Londonderry Cul 6e sac 0.05 A34C 2,689 - ! 65
Willow Springs 4 Sha* Oaks Kerley 0,20 C34C 11.S56 2 65
Page Totes X393,862
•
A
•
Street Study
Table 111
Page Eleven
8oun4arios length Street Drainage Plding Otstress Date Lest toted
Street N!w Quid. No. Fran To Miles Class Costs Costs Q aIIty Polnts No. Day Yr.
Hobson Lane 4 Teasley FM-1830 1.16 C255 ; $0,094 - 2 56
So. Locust 4 IH 35 Eagle 0.10 025S 4,356 - 3 60
Pombrooke 4 Longridge Fairfax 0,65 A34C 37,752 3 62 12/28/84
Bernard 4 Nlllow%ood IM-35 0,10 A36C 6,808 3 65
Bernard 4 Hickory Eagle 0.60 A3CC 31.880 ! 68
linden 1,2 Malone 6unnle brat 0;35 C44C 46,235 2 46 12/07/84
0.25
Emery 1,2 Bonnie Brae Malone 9.36 134C 34,687 - 1 46 12107164
0,25
Cordell 1.2 Hll?crtst Malone 0.10 A44C 7.920 2 61 12/05/84
Y -N !3,760
• Sycanwre 2,3 1e111 Bell 1,61 CIOC 142 1 54 12111/84
0.3n 20.030
Congress 2,3 Oakland Ponder 0,75 C34C 3_i.944 2 69 i
0,20 23.232
Locust 3,1 Cagle Mulberry 0.20 A54C 19.166 - 2 57
43! O, s0 26, 750 •
1
Page Total 1390,431
J
1
• / W 1• ~Y..~Y•.. . • Y rte... 1.
e
4C)
e
i
i
Table IV
DISTRESS POINTS 70
REBUILD
Ii
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total M
Street Name ucd. No. From To Miles Class Costs. Costs Qua IIty points Eng, and Cont.
Thomas 1 Oak Emery 0.05 R34C $329,10: 30,226 2 73 413,221
Bonnie Brie I Ainey Windsor 0.65 C7SS 345,979 0 3 75 391,87E
• Barrow 1 Westgate Darby 0,10 034C 29,380 0 4 76 33,787
Marshall 1 Hwy. 380 Hampton 0160 MS 26F,2B0 21,236 2 76 330,446
I
Bonnie Brae 1 Wlndior University 0.70 C25S 247,824 54,400 3 71 301,551
Payne 1 8onnle Brie IM-35 1.20 A205 $12,502 120,130 3 71 196,521
e Hampton 1 Marshall Marsh Branch 0.75 P25S 350,402 61,980 2 79 462,964 e
8onnle Brae 1 University Scripture 0.16 C45S 312,970 409,625 3 90 899,984
Cindy 1 Hwy. 380 Hampton 0.65 A25S 191,605 25,740 2 9S 261,097
Page total X7,487,463
• O
e
0
0
1
e
Street Study
Table IV
Page Two
BounGaries length Street Ora1n„ge Rlding Distress Total a 153
Str!!t Name Quad. No. From To _ 191les) Class Costs Costs Quality Points £no. and Cont.
Scripture 1 IH•35 Bonnie Brae 0.50 C22S 226,338 76,190 3 99 j 347,907
Brook HOIT.w 1 Greenway End 0.10 A34C 86,7% D 1 105 99,815
West Cak 1 IN-35 Y 0.30 A64C 156,512 24,150 4 114 207,876
West Oak 1,2 Bonnie Brae J820e 0.45 A36C 221,795 27,964 1 71 321,295
0.25 15,S36 0 0
Hlrtory 1.2 Avenue C Bonnie Brae 0_40 A45C 323,895 2 72 372,479
1.30
Oak 2 Bolivar Jagoe 1.00 A36C 335,734 91,800 2 70 461,440
Pearl 2 Denton Carroll 0.10 A34C 39,781 0 1 70 45,149
Lovell 2 Scripture Egan 0.10 03 V. 43,39e 0 2 71 49,908
Hickory 2 Avenue C Welch 0.40 A36C 148,263 26,125 3 72 200,547
a Magnolia 2 New Asphalt Bolivar 0.30 R34C 108,495 4S,410 2 74 176,991
a
Bolivar 2 Northridge 11niveasity 0.70 P34C 260,388 149,712 2 76 411,615
Fry 2 Scripture Oak 0.20 A34C 77,755 21,150 2 78 113,740
S
Stuart 2 Selurt Hercules 0.30 107,474 0 78 123,595
6 ~e
Hlcvory 2 Carroll Cedar 0.10 A3fC 73,277 18,T60 2 79 105,045
Welch 2 Mulberry hickory 0.10 27• 31.066 15,615 79 53,694
Pershing 1 Stuart Atlas 0.20 034C 68,713 0 I 97 79,020
Page Total j7, 230, 716
•
4ti
•
Street Study
Table IV
Pape Three
s
Boundarfes length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total a 153
Street keae ad. Nc. From To _ (Mlte~ LAM Costs Costs Quality Points Eng. and Cont.
Hickory 2,3 Cedar Austin 0_05 A63C 101,695 2 74 $ 116,950
0,15
Avenue C 2,4 111-35 Mulberry 0.30 C55C 419,347 27,775 2 85 556,781
0.40 37,035
Mis tywood 3 Woodhaven Robinwood 0.?0 R44C 107,965 117,000 2 70 258,709
4
Roberts 3 Northwood Bell 0,35 R34C 141,043 121,552 2 73 301,984
Cherryvood 3 Greenwood Woodland 0.20 R34C 75,946 0 2 77 87,338
Woodhaven 3 Mistywood Frierson 0.30 R34C 83,179 0 2 77 95,656
Locust 3 Sherman Orr 0.55 A34V 306,718 104,775 3 79 473,218
Bell 3 University Sherman 0.30 01CO 75,083 0 3 80 86,316
Texas 3 Ruddell Crawford 0.05 R255 39,174 49,650 3 82 74,978
• Audra 3 End of Ofvfde Mockingbird 1.00 379,449 123,900 83 678,851
Glenwood 3 wfndsor Unfversity 0.70 R34C 264,004 73,760 2 85 387,739
.v
Rose 3 Paisley lens 0.15 P25S 37,014 0 2 S9 42,572
Nfcdcry 3 Austin RR 0,?0 A55C 182,325 87,450 2 94 310.241
43!
Orfole 3 Mock fn9bIrd Cardinal 0,35 R34C 94,029 0 3 145 108,133
Locust 3 Congress University 0.70 A31C 404,716 183,350 82 682,095
Prairie 4 Avenue E Bonnie Crae 0,45 R34C 139,235 0 2 73 160,120
Page total =1,321,711
`1
s
o
•
Street Study
Table IV
Page Four
_ Boundaries Length Street Drainage 11009 Distress Total + 151
Street Wame Quid. No. Fran To (Miles) Class Costs Costs ,Qwtltz Points Env, and Cont.
v
Avenue A 4 highland McCormick 0,55 A14C 182,633 0 2 75 = 210,028
Bonnie Brae 4 FM 1515 Santa Fe Tracts 0.86 R25S 338,617 75,335 3 75 476,045
kingswood 4 Londonderry Cul de sec O.OS A34C 18,082 0 2 76 20,794
Maple 4 Avenue D Bernard 0.70 R74C 251,346 0 2 83 289,048
Aoselawn 4 Ft, Vorth Or. City Limits 1.35 0255 601, 669 137,398 2 85 849,928
S. Locust 4 South End 1" 35 0,20 A25S 65,290 0 2 86 75,083
Spencer 4 Woodrow loop 268 1.40 A255 572,502 206,850 2 92 896,255
Acme 4 Bernard S. Locust 0,25 PISS 81,612 25,000 2 94 122,604
Avenue C 4 IH 35 Eagle 0.05 C34C 36,806 0 2 102 42,327
i
fOCF 4 Eagle highland 0.15 A25S 83,761 0 3 110 96,325
•
James 4 Massey Ft. Worth Dr. 0,10 R25S 241,573 58,395 4 125 344,963
i
Fie 4 Highl4nd Eagle 0.15 A41C 93,242 190,250 BS 3T4,516 1
Page Total 13,737,916
i
• 4 , ~ 1
•A
•
N
1
1
I
e ,
i
STREET STUCT :41dtIMG
i
Boundaries length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total a 151
Rant Street Name Quad. No. From To (M11et ; fast costs Costs Quo 11 t-V Points Eno. and Cont.
1 0111crest l Scripture Emery 0.65 R40C 47,018 3
- ! 60 ft/05/84
1 Avenue C 2 Mulberry Oak 0.20 046.50 IS,798 2 44 12/12/64
1 Bolivar 2 Congress University 0.80 C30C 40,054 4 44
1 kfi,gs ACV 2 Stuart Sherman 0.70 C30C 40,445 1 44 11/08/83
1 Elm 2 Prafr!e Highland 0.10 A45C 7,899 2 46
1 Magnolia 2 New Asphalt Hinkle 0.25 R34C 14,445 47
1 Elm 2 Congress Oak 0.30 ASOC 26,588 - t 50
I Stuart 2 kings Row Coronado 0.60 C34C 34,661 52
1 Elm 2 Mulberry Prairie 0.20 A45C 15,738 - 2 SS
I Hercules 2 picadflly Sheraton 0.30 C34C 17,314 1 55
1 Carroll 2 Northridge Ross 0.50 A36C 29,040 2 S1 11/28/84
1 Oak 2 Austin Bolivar 0.20 ASOC 17,424 2 81
1 Hercules 2 Redstone Stuart 0.25 C60C 26,400 t 62
e O
1 Stuart 2 Hercules kings Pow 0.40 C34C 23,112 - 66
i 1 Locust 3 Hickory Oak 0105 ASX 5,628 2 42
1 Withers 3 Oakland Mingo 0.30 434C 17,334 1 43
I Robfnwood 3 Emerson University 0.60 134C 34,668 2 44 11/02/84
4a `
•
Street Study Ranking
Page 2
-F Boundaries Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress Total • 15i
Aank Street Name Quid. No, roal To (Miles class Costs Costs
111t~ Points End. Ind Cont
1 Paisley 3 Woodford Nettie 0.20 C24S 8,085
3 45 11/01/84
i tocust 3 Oak McKfnmay 0.05 AMC 4,431
3 /6
1 Paisley 3 Frame Ruddell 0.40 Ct2s 13,857
2 46 11/01/84
1 First 3 1.11var Locust 0.15 A34C 8,661
' 1 46 ~
I Greenwjod 3 Laurel Wood Cherrywood 0.70 R34C 40,445
! 4) 1
1 Kings Row 3 Sherman Torkshire 0.30 C44C 23,118
19 11/08/83
I Mockingbird 3 McKinney Oriole )DO' 0.50 R34C 28,889 _
1 51
i locust 3 McKinney Congress 0.20 A45C 15,798 ,
51
35 2
I Emerson 3 Freedom W1lsonwood 1.50 A34C 86,669
2 52 11/02/84
1 Austin 3 McKinney Mulberry 0.15, RNC 8,666
• ! 53 {
1 Audra 3 &Klnney End of Divide 0,30 CSSC 29,480 1
54
1 locust 3 Mulberry Hickory 0.05 ASOC
5,628 2 65
1 Mingo 3 .ithers Mockingbird 2.20 A3O$ 116,160 - g
58
® 1 Old North Road 3 University Mi11 Pond 0.35 U4C ?7,720 •
I 59 12/20/03
1 crane 3 PAX S. McKinney 0.30 034C 77,424
t 61
I Nottingham 3 University Windsor 0.80 A40C 61,869
! 62
1 Greenwood 3 Cherrywood Sherman 0.20 R34C 11,616
! 64
1 Locust 3 University Sherman Or, 0,10 A34C 5,662 ,
2 64
i
4A
•
•
w=
street stuly Ranking w
Page 3
i
Bounaaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total 152
Rank Street Name Nod. No. From _ To MiTes Class Costs Casts Quality Points Eno. and Cont.
1 Elm 3 University Congress 0.70 A45C 65,440 2 66
1 Paisley 3 Hettie Ruddel1 0.70 C24S 4,356 2 66 11/01/84
1 Pertain 3 Mingo Wayne 0.10 A25S 4,356 - 2 66 11101/04
1 McCormlck 4 Parvin WiIIowood 0.30 A34C 17,334 2 49 12/14/84
1 HollyhI11 4 Aidgecrest Tennyson 1.10 R34C 63,557 2 51 12/28/84
1 Avenue D 4 Highland I4-35 0.25 934C 14,445 2 54
1 Nobsnn Lane 4 Teasley FM-1830 1.15 C25S 50,094 2 S6
1 Bonnie Brae 1 Riney Windsor 0.65 C25S 345,979 0 3 75 397,876
I Bonnie Brae 1 Windsor University 0.70 C25S 247,824 14,400 3 77 301,557
1 Bonnie Brae 1 University Scripture 0.75 C45S 372,970 409,625 3 90 899,984
• 1 Scripture 1 IM-35 Bonnie Brae 0.50 CM 226,338 75,190 3 99 347,907
1 West Oak I IH-35 T 0,30 A64C 156,512 24,250 4 114 207,676
1 Hickory 1,2 Avenue C Bonnie Brae 0.40 A45C 323,895 2 72 372,479
1.30
43 1 Oak 2 Bolivar J19ae 1.00 A36C 336,334 91,800 2 70 461,440 Q
I Hickory 2 Avenue C Welch 0.40 A36C 148,263 26,125 3 72 200,547
1 Ma9nolia 2 New Asphalt Bolivar 0.30 R34C 100,495 45,410 2 74 176,991
7 Bolivar 2 Northridge University 0.70 R34C 260,386 149,712 2 76 471,676
1 Fry 2 Scripture Oak 0,20 R34C 77,155 21,150 2 71 1'3,740
1
i ' `1
•
•
{
1
Street Study Ranking
Page 4 4
r
Boundaries Length Street Oralnoge Riding Distress Total a 15%
Rank Street Name Nail. No. Prom - 10 (Miles) Class costs costs -Qua If Points Eno, and Cont.
1 Stuart 2 Selene Hercules 0.30 107,474 0 78 123,595
1 Hickory 2 Carroll Cedar 0.10 A36C 73,227 18,1tJ 2 79 )05,045
1 Welch 2 Mulberry Hickory 0.10 27a 31,066 15.6F5 79 53,694
1 Pershing 2 Stuart Atlas 0,20 A34C 68,713 0 1 97 79,020
I Avenue C 2,4 IN-35 Mulberry 0.30 C55C 419,347 21,715 2 85 556,781
0.40 37,035
1 Locust 3 Sherman Orr 0,55 A34Y 306,718 104,775 3 79 473,218
1 Audra 3 End of Divide Paisley 1,00 83
1 Glenwood 3 Windsor University 0.70 R34C 264,004 73,160 2 BS 387,739
1 Avenue A 4 Highland McCormick 0.55 A34C 182,633 0 2 75 210,028
1 Acne 4 Bernard Fort Worth Dr, 0.25 R25S 61,612 25,000 2 94 61,302
• 1 Elm 4 Highland Eagle 0.15 A41C 93,242 180,250 5 85 314.516
I
2 Masch Branch 1 University Jim Chrsstal 0,75 A22W -81,200
2 Mulberry 2 Elm Bernard 0.40 C36C 24,654 2 40 12/12184
Q 2 Alice 2 Congress Egan 0.10 0XIC 5.007 0 44 •
-
2 Alice 2 [gap University 0,75 034C 43,334 2 49
2 Scripture 2 Bryan Ponder 0,10 C40S 1,234 - 2 61 12/05184
2 Fry 2 Oak Hickory 0.10 034C 5.808 61
2 Third 3 Bolivar Locust 0.30 R25C 15,020 1 43
,A _
r
•
Street Study Ranking
Faye S
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riling Distress Total ♦ 15% F
Rink Street Name Quad. No. From To (Miles Class Costs Costs alfU Points fng. and Cont. cF
2 Churchill 3 Burn Tree Nottingham 0,10 R34C 5,778 44 11/29183
2 Hanover 3 Windsor Emerson 0.25 R34C 14,445 1 45 12/20/83
2 Industrial 3 Hickory Bell 0.20 R40C 13,869 1 46
2 Folcroft 3 Emerson Emerson 0.70 R34C 40,445 1 47 11/02/84
2 Churchill 3 Nlndsor Nottingham 0,35 A34C 20,223 1 52 }1/29/83
2 Mlstywood 3 Nottingham Woodhaven 0.45 A44C 34,676 2 55
2 Archer Trail 3 Emerson Emerson 0.45 R34C 26,136 - 1 56 12/20/83
2 Cardinal 3 McKinney End 0.65 R34C 37,752 3 60 11/02/84
2 Walnut 3 Austin Cedar 0.10 R34C 5,808 2 60
2 tfnwood 3 Sherian Crestwood 0.26 A34C 14,520 2 64
. 2 Central 4 Eagle Highl and 0.15 R34C 8,667 1 40 12/12184
2 Dudley 4 McCormick Jacqueline 0,10 A34C 5,778 1 40 12/14/84
2 Oakwood 4 Mercedes Cul de sac 0.10 R34C 5,778 2 40 12/14/84
2 McCormick 4 Nillowwood IH-35 0.65 A34C 37,556 2 40 12/11/84
F 0
O 2 Wisteria 4 W11}owood Golf 0.10 031C 5,778 - 2 40 12/II/84
2 Chasevood 4 Pembrooke Woodbrook 0.10 A34C 5,778 I 40
2 Kendolph 4 W111owwood IN-35 0.50 A34C 28,890 2 41 12/14/84
2 Collier 4 IH•35 Eagle 0,30 R34C 17,334 1 41 12/12/84
t.
O
O
i
I
O
i
street Study Ranting
Page 6
Vr
e .I
_ Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total ♦ 15%
Rank Street flame .Quad. Wo. From 10 Miles Class Costs Costs slft Points Eno. and Cant.
2 Savannah 4 Teasley Longridge 0.40 A34C 23,112
2 43 12/29/84
2 Welch 4 Eagle Highland 0.15 C40C 10,402 2 13
12/12/84
2 Woodbrook 4 Pennsylvania IN-35 0.60 A44C 61,647 _
2 44 12/28/84
2 Willowood 4 McCormick aernard 0.30 C22S 10,393
3 41 12/11181
2 Travers 4 Hopkins Drive P1D1n9 Rock 0.05 a
R34C 2,884 - 1 1011110
2 Mfllowood 4 Bonnie Brae Highland Park 0.40 C25S 16,170 - 2 45
12/N/84
2 Westwood 4 Parvfn Wlllcw%ood 0135 R34C 20,223
1 /5
2 Rldgecrest 4 Pennsylvania Rfdgecrest 1.80 R34C 104,002 _
2 16 12/28/84
2 Myrtle 4 Daugherty Collins 0.25 R34C 14,445 2 47 :r
2 Jacyueifne 4 Parvfn Willowood 0.40 A34C 23,112
3 49 12lU/81
2 Wilshire 4 Avenue C Avenue 0 0.10 R31S 5,778
• - 2 51 12/12/84
2 Willow Springs 4 Shady Oaks Kerley 0.20 C34C 11,556 - 2 55
2 Pembrooke 4 Longridge Fairfax 0.65 034C 37,752 - 3
62 12/28/84
2 Bernard 4 Hickory Eagle 0.60 A30C 31,680
2 68
O 2 Bell 3 university Sherman 0.30 C31C• 75,083
0 ] BO 66.346
2 Hickory 3 Austin AA 0.30 A55C 182,325 0.450 l p
9+ 31o,2a
3 Bellmead I Emery Thomas 0.20 0340 11,55a s...
S 49 12/05/81
3 Mesa 1 ed,, •.a University 0.35 134C 20,400
l
•
0
•
•
Street Study Ranking
Rage 7
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total a in
Aunt Street Name Quid. No. From To (Miles) Class costs costs Quality Points Env. And Cont.
3 Welch 2 Hickory Oak 0110 A30C 5,007 _ 40 12/14/84
3 Yellowstone 2 Sun Valley Rings Row 0.30 R34C 17,334 2 41 11/16/84
3 Coronado 2 Locust Bell 0.30 C34C 17,334 3 43
11128184
3 Scripture 2 Jagoe Bryan D.20 C30C 10,013 2 44 12/05/84
3 Georgetown 2 Baling Green University 0.70 R30C 35,047 2 44 11/28/64
3 Crescent 2 Malone Bolivar 0,90 R44C 69,353 1 44
3 Cctor 2 Scripture University 0.80 C40C 55,178 2 49 12/05/84
3 Dover 3 Sherman Avon 0.15 A44C 11,5S9 1 19 17/08/87
3 Headiee 2 Hinkle Bolivar 0.50 R34C 28,889 2 SI 11/28/84
3 venison 2 Sherman University 0110 R34C 5, BOB 2 60
• 3 Nestway 2 Bolivar Fulton 0.45 R34C 26,136 2 69
3 Royal Lane 3 Mistywood Rockwood 0.20 R44C 15,412 1 14 11/09/84 i
3 Avon 3 Stratford Heather 0,15 134C 8,667 2 44 It/06/83
3 Junes 3 Windsor Old Orchard Ad 0.26 034C 14,445 1 44 11/29/83
ID 3 Williamsburg 3 Nottingham Jamestown 0.20 R34C 11,556 •
2 16
3 Oak I RR Austin 0.30 ASSC 26,480 2 52
3 Laurelwood 3 Kayewood University 0.45 934C 26,136 2 58
3 ayewood 3 Crestwood Greenwood 0.5, R34C 31,944 - 2 0
~ a
•
•
Street Study Aankfng !y
Page 8
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total a 15%
flank Street Name Quid. No. From To
(Mlles) Class Costs Costs Qualftr Paints Eng. and Cont.
3 Rockwood 3 Emerson laurel wood 0.30 A34C 17,424 1 64 11101/84
3 Heather 3 Stratford Oxford 0.40 934C 23,232 - 2 65 11/16/81
I
3 Lock sIey 3 Emerson Nottingham 0.25 834C 14,5?0 1 67 12120183
3 Wood 3 Mc9Inney Texas 0.50 034C 29,040 2 67
3 Bernard 4 Yillowwood IH.35 0.10 136C 5,808 - 3 65
3 Thomas 1 Oak Emery 0.85 A34C 329,101 30,225 2 73 413,215
3 Marshall i Hwy. 380 Hampton 0.60 8255 ?66,280 21,238 2 76 330,646
3 Pearl 2 Denton Carroll 0.10 R34C 39,781 0 1 70 45,749
3 Mistywood 3 Woodhaven AoDirwood 0.20 R44C 107,965 117,000 ? 70 258,209
3 Oriole 3 Mockingbird Cardinal 0.35 R34C 94,029 0 3 145 108,133
C 3 locust 3 Congress Uiiversfty 0.70 A31C 404,776 183,350 - 82 682,095
3 Maple 4 Avenue D Bernard 0.70 w34C 251,346 ' .5, c ' 2 83 289,046
4 Stanley I Emery Panhandle 0.50 934C 28,689 I 55
I
4 Colt 2 Westway Congress 0.70 034C 40,443 2 41
49 4 Manhattan 2 Sherman Stuart 0.30 034C 17,334 2 44 •
4 Avenue B 2 Oak Hickory 0.05 R40C 3,467 1 45
4 Atlas 2 Redstone Hercules 0.30 134C 17,334 - 2 49 11/16/84
4 Got+er ? Cordell Scripture 0.60 134C 34,667 2 52 1?/05/84
I
•
s
I
Street Study PankingPage 9
I
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total a 151
Rank Street flame ad. No. From To (Miles) Class Costs Costs Quality Points En. And Cont. t
4 Sena 2 Malone Ectcr 0.35 R34C 20,223 - 2 55 12107/64
I
4 Denton 2 Crescent Hickory 0.75 R34C 4,350 - 1 56
4 Mluosa 2 Bolivar Hinkle 0.55 R34C 31,944 - 2 56 I
i
4 Denison 2 Shervan Headlee 0.40 R34C 23,232 - 59
4 Emery 2 Fulton 1200' Carroll 0,35 934C 20,328 - 2 60
4 Austin 3 Oakland Parkway 0.70 R25C 28,299 - 1 44
I
4 Frame 3 RR Tracks Grove 0.25 A34C 14,445 - 1 44
I
4 PaInk"d 3 Glenwood Kayewood 0.05 R34C 2,889 1 45 11102184 j
I
4 Campbell 3 McKinney Paisley 0.35 A34C 20,223 - 1 4S 11/01/84
i
4 Pecan 3 Cedar Austin 0,10 R40C 6,935 2 45
4 Bradshaw 3 Paisley MCKlnrey 0.30 R34C, 17,334 - 1 46
•
4 Live Oak 3 Sherman Robinwood 0.20 R34C 11,556 2 48 11/16/84
4 third 3 Locust Oakland 0.20 030C 10,013 48
4 Crawford 3 Teas McKinney 0.30 R34C 17,424 2 64
Q 4 Woodland 3 Cherrywood SMrman 0150 P34C 29,040 2 69 0
4 Avenue B 4 Maple Underwood 0.30 R30C 15,020 2 55
4 Camden Ct. 4 londonderry CUT de sec O,D5 P34C 2,889 2 55
4 So. locust 4 lH 35 Eagle 0.10 A255 4,3S6 - 3 60
~ 0 ,
e
v
e
Street Study Ranking v
Page 10
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Riding Distress Total • 15%
Rank Street Mane Quad. No. Frce To (Miles) Class Costs Costs Quality Points Eng. and Cont.
4 Cherrywood 3 Greenwood Woodland 0.20 R34C 75,946 0 2 77 87,338
4 Woodhaven 3 Mistywood Emerson 0.30 R34C 83,179 0 2 17 95,656
4 Rose 3 Paisley Texas 0.15 R25S 37,014 0 2 39 42,572
4 91ngswood 4 Londonderry Cut de sec 0.05 R34C 18,082 0 2 75 20,7.44
5 Los Colinas I Mesa IM-35 0.05 R44C 3,853 1 46 02121184
5 Colonial 1 Augusta Tnunderbird 0.15 R34C 8,667 1 46
5 Greenway 1 Augusta Brookhollow 0,25 944C 19,265 - 1 51 02/21/84
5 Thunderbird 1 IM-35 Greenway 0.25 P44C 19,800 - 1 56 02/21/84
5 Lariat 1 Hamptun Marshall 0.75 025S 32,470 - 1 67
{
5 Bradley 2 Sena Oak 0,25 R25C 10,107 1 40
i
e 5 Mounts 2 Congress Oak 0.30 034C 17,334 2 41 12/01184
5 Amarillo 2 Gregg Panhandle/100' 0.40 A34C 23,112 - 1 45 iI
5 Fallmeadow 2 Hwy. 77 6ardenview 0,30 A34C 17,134 - 1 46 11/28/64
5 Egan 2 Malone Bolivar 0,80 034C 46,223 1 46
e 5 Anna 2 Panhandle University 0,60 034C 34,667 - 2 50 12/07/84
5 Sunset 2 Anna University 0,35 034C 20,223 - 1 51
5 Highland 2 Elm Welch 0.60 A30C 30,040 - 2 64
5 Bryn Mawr 2 Hinkle Werst 0,20 034C 11,616 - 2 56 11/28/64
i
e Q
•
C~
O
•
StrLit Study Ranking
Page 11
Boundaries Length Street Drainage Aiding Distress total + 151
Pink Street Max Quid. No. From To Mlles! Class Costs Costs Quality Polots Eng. and Cont.
5 Ponder 2 Oak linden 6100' 0.50 R34C 29,040 1 56
5 Norval 2 Oak Scripture 0.15 134C 8,712 2 54
S Cedar 2 Mulberry McKinney 0.20 034C It.616 2 68
5 Mill Pond 3 Emerson Emerson 0.50 R34C 28.890 } 41 12120183 $
5 Boyd 3 University Mingo 0.35 034C 20,223 - 1 44 11101/84
5 Davis 3 Ruddell Crawford 0.10 R34C 5.718 1 a4 11102/84
5 Robin Circle 3 Nottingham Cut de sac 0.10 R34C 5,778 } 44
5 Ruddell 3 Paisley Willis 0.20 C22S 6,929 4 44
5 Old Lee Ct. 3 Burnfrg Tree Cut de sac 0.05 134C 2,889 3 46 11/09/84
5 Audra 3 Mockingbird loop 288 0.50 C25S 20,211 3 46 11102184
5 Cromwell 3 Wellington YorMshfre 0.20 R34C 11,556 2 41 11114/84
•
5 N ird 3 Audra Paisley 0.50 C25S 20,213 47
5 Y.r."q' v 3 Kings Row Shermn Drive 0.30 034C 17,334 1 50 11/08/83
5 Virginia 3 Ny. 300 North End O.1D 134C 5,778 - 3 52 11/16/84
0 5 Moclingblyd 3 RR Audra 0.30 C25S 12,128 62 4
5 Woodford Ct. 3 Woodford Dead end 0.05 A34C 2,RAO 2 54 11/01/84
5 frame 3 Woodland University 0.10 R34C 5.608 2 61
6 Kann 3 Oakland locust 0,10 126C 4,356 - ! 62
•
c,
•
r
•
t 4w
Street Study Ranking
Page 12
Boundaries length Street Drainage Aiding Ofstress Total + 16%
Rank Street Name Wad. No. From to Miles Ctas's Costs Costs Quality Points Enq. end Cont.
5 Edgewood 3 Northwood Crestwood 0.10 R34C 6,808 - 1 63
5 Northwood Ter 3 Edgewood Cul de sac 0.10 A34C 5,808 - 1 65
5 Sawyer 3 Oakland locust 0.15 R25C 6,534 - 1 68
5 Barrow I Westgate Dirty 0.10 R34C 29,380 0 4 76 33,787
5 Payne 1 Bonnie Brae 1H-35 1.20 R20S 572,502 120,130 3 77 796,527
5 Hampton 1 Marshall Marsh Branch 0.75 R25S 350,602 51,980 2 79 462.964
5 Cindy 1 Hwy. 380 Hampton 0.55 R25S 192,605 25,140 2 95 251,097
i Brook Hollow 1 6reenway End 0.10 134C 86,196 0 1 105 99,815
f Lovell 2 Scripture Egan 0.10 034C 43,398 0 2 11 49,908
5 Roberts 3 Northwood Bell 0.35 R34C 141,043 IE'1,652 2 73 301,984
5 Texas 3 Ruddell Crawford D.OS A2S5 39,174 49,650 3 82 74,978
5 Prairie 4 Avenue E Bonnie Brae 0.45 A34C 139,235 0 2 73 160,120 if
j
5 Bonnie Brae 4 FM 1515 Santo To Tracks 0.80 R255 338,617 75,335 3 is 416,045
5 Roselown 4 Ft. Worth Dr. Clay Limits 1.35 R25S 601, 669 137,398 2 as 849,928
• 5 S. Locust 4 South End lH 35 0.20 R255 65,290 D 2 66 75,063 0
5 Spencer 4 Woodrow Loop 288 1.40 R25S 572,502 206,850 2 92 896,255 {
5 Acme 4 Fort Worth Or. S. Locust 0.2S 12SS 81,618 25,000 2 94 61,302
5 Avenue E 4 211 35 Eagle 0.05 C34C 36,806 0 2 102 42,321
{
0
I
0
•
Street Study Ramkimg
Page 13
AAnk Street Name ad, k'o. fro* Boundaries
TO Length Street Drainage Riding Dlstnss Total a 16%
IMiles class Costs Costs all Points Emil, and Cont.
5 100E 4 Eagle Highland 0,15 R255 83,761
0 3 110 %,325
5 James 4 Massey At. Worth or. 0.70
A255 241,573 ~ 58,395 ~ 4 125 344,963
1,l Locust 3,4 Eagle Mulberry 0`20 A54C 11,M! _ 2
0.30 37
28,750
l,l West Oak 1,2 Bonnie Brae Jagoe 0.45 A36C 227,795 27 964
0,25 1 2 71 321,295
15,5;6 6 0 0
1,2 Congress 2,3 Oakland Ponder
0`75 C31C 3.1,941 It 69
0.20 23,232
2,1 Hickory 2,3 Cedar Austin Oy05 A63C 101,695
0,15 2 74 116,950
2,3 SCrIpture 2 Thomas Japoe 0.50 C30C 25,033 _
2 51 !2/05/84
2,3 Sycamore 2,3 Welch sell
0.60 C VC 2 r 1 54 12114184
0,30 20,030
• 5,2 Linden 1,2 Malone Bonnie Brae 0_35 C44C 46,235 - 2 46 12107181 J
0.25 I
5.4 Cordell 1,2 xillcrest Malone
110 044C 71920,: ! 61 12/05/64
0.30 23,760
5,5 Emery 1,2 BonnN Brae Malone 0.35 034C 34,667
0 0.25 l 46 12/07/84 0
!r I
Ali ,
II ' ~ i 1
0 Q re n- ,r. 'n,y" k,; t0~eaysrq r<^ ~'J
0
0
v
BOND ISSUE STREET DATA
RESURFACING
Street Name Distress Points Costs Rank
Woodland 69 29,040 1
Sawyer 68 6,534 2
Wood 67 29,040 3 3
Paisley 66 4,356 4
Pertain 66 4,356 4
l i
Heather 65 23,232 5 3
Northwood Terrace 65 5,808 5 s
Locust/Unit//Orr
Linwood 64 14,520 6
Crawford 64 17,424 6
Rockwood 64 17,424 6
Greenwood 64 11,616 6
Cdgewood 63 518U8 7,S'
Nottingham 62 57,869 81
Kayewood 62 31,944
Hann 62 4,356 8 8 15
6'
Frame/RRX/S, McKinney 61 17,424 9 1
Frame/Woodland/Univ, 61 5,808 9 /
Oak 61 17,424 9
Cardinal 60 37,752 Walnut 60 51808 110 12
0
Old North Road 59 27,720 t
3.1 f
Laurelwood 58 26,136
. Mingo 58 116,160 12 %
Locust/Eagle/Mulberry 57 47,916 131
Archer Trail 56 26,136 149
Mistywood 55 34,676 1501
Locust/Mulberry/Hickory 55 5,628 151 • 0
•
Congress 54 54,890
Woodford (Circle) Ct. 54 2,889 16~
Sycamore 54 45,067 16A ,
Audra 54 29,480 161
•
yl
•
i
w
,
Street Name Distress Points Costs Rank
Austin/McKinney/Mulberry 53 8,666 171
Emerson 52 86,669 181
Mockingbird/RR/Audra 52 12,128 18;50
Churchill/Windsor/NottinE am 52 20,223 18A
Mockingbird/McKinney/Oriole 51 28,889 19 1
Locust/McKinney/Congress 51 15,798 191
Yorkshire 50 17,334 20 $
Dover 49 11,559 21C
King's Row 49 23,118 211
Live Oak 48 11,555 224
Third 48 10,013 22Y
Croiuell 47 11,556 23 ,S'
Foxcroft 47 40,445 23A
Greenwood 47 40,445 23 1
Mockingbird 47 20,213 23 q~
Old Lee Ct. 46 2,889 24
Williamsburg 46 11,556 24L?
Audra 46 20,213 24
Bradshaw 46 17,334 24
Locust/Oak/McKinney 46 4,431 24
Paislt,y 46 13,857 241
First 46 8,667 24 1
Paisley 45 8,085 251
Campbell 45 20,223 25-4
Palmwood 45 2,889 2514
Industrial 45 13,869 25jR
Pecan 45 6,935 254
Hanover 45 14,445 25
Robin Circle 44 5,778 26 1
Avon/Stratford/Heather 44 8,667 26
Churchill/Burning Tree/Nottingham44 5,778 264
Dunes 44 14,445 2613
p Robinwood 44 34,658 26
Royal Lane 44 15,412 263
Frame/RR Tracks/Grove 44 14,445 26+
Boyd 44 20,223 26 C
Davis 44 5,778 26 6'
Austin 44 28,299 26,f
p Withers 43 17,334 27 1 ' O O
Third 43 15,020 27.E
Locust/Hickory/Oak 42 5,628 281
Mill Fund 41 28,890_ 29f
Total $1,526,363
0
c~
O
i '
1
END
i S
f+
f~
f -
4
a'
A
f
0 F
0
FILE 0 0
i I
Ii