The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986 - 1992 i I Y. CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL EWWWO / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (817) 888.8307 QfNoe of the City Manager M1F M0 ~2AE~7Y7L7M Tot Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FRoMt Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manages. DATEt July 14, 1992 SUBJECTS Cost of Good Samaritan improvements The revised CIP plan now shows two projects for Good Samaritan Village in the list of projects submitted, Neither of these projects are currently in the proposed five year plan, Staff has done cost estimates on the original project which would have enclosed the open channel in a box culvert from Headlee all the way to the south end of Good Sam property at the main channel. The cost of this project with the pertinent inlets and other structures is estimated at $351,000. Also, a revised project has been submitted, This project would enclose the existing open channel in a box culvert from }ieadlee to just south of the main driveway, It would also include channel work from this entrance to the main channel to facilitate better slopes, This project is estimated by our Engineering Department to be $222#000« The request seems to address aesthetics and quality of life issues such as standing water, Unsightly weeds and grans were also cited. Flooding complaints have only come recently which may have been caused by a temporary dam used by our drainage crews for protection of their work area, If you or the Council has further questions, I would be happy to try and answer them, Rick Pv4eh Deputy City Manager RStbw AMM00178 1 1993-97 CAPITAL, IMPROVEMENT PLAIN' OENERAL GOVERNMENT ANN FVDIWHCTS PRAI134`f Alu J MDOND IN AP itND SUBMITTED PROJR(7f_kAMH OT114R ANp 1?UNUS, CANSTRUCTtoN TOTAL JrJAxNUNA No DRAINAGE lN~ss ANA 0014-90 moorl1~fp 1liA J3 c~?NN13CT1UN E - 159,000 DRAINAGE 08112 8QUOIA PARK DRAJNAQH 159,000 J 17RAINAo~ 48~Q»13' TNUNDIIRIItp NAOE 1,041,000 1 1,041,000 4-14 DAPIIHLSIFT, WORT}I DRIVE DRAINAGE 84,000 >aRAINA AQ9 t3R b610-tb C(1RRIN~IOAUR 930,000 330,000 RAE DIUVI3 DRINAGE 1,53jj04 . 1,003,W0 RAINApE 0810 17 b!, WORTH 531000 D 537 03IS1~1ti : ,000 Nd11'El;?ATk:>?AJNAa~f' DRAINAGE 0810 19 ,C61T STREET D1tA1NAdB 4064' 000 X4,904 12RA~N~IQE 0810»20 1t4Ul iiiq N 1'~rAp~ISONA PRA1NAgf~ 480,000 Pxmt4 R 0810-22 HIGHLAND PARK ROAD 162~7'~ 162 ,000 BRA"tNAq.~ 431c1~~3, . 13A~'}' H}A'K~ItX sTR't'.p1tA1NAtJH 143,0 ,000 162,oon DRAWAO 0810 24 50ciTN RUIitiE},L ST, DRAtAINA 143,OW W p►tAWAa 0ti1 0^25 .F94A1~1 S~1EE~1C » ~tralyt)gu; To WA4pgpW - 1!752,000 257,000 DRAINAGE 0810-26 OAKLAND STREET I)RAIN4Oi3 185,000 1,185,000 kI1EAINAp Qi14}"27A1T1{p.taRAXNApS 40/,pOtl D RAWAa iJi 0810-28 STIt1CK}.ANU JUNIOR }ilol} 004 z34,A00 0?9AINA08 0ilA~29 (MS?R SAMIAIi~~A~1' Vt~,X, og 79,004 79,000 I.'J DI;AINAOH 0810.2911 GOOD sAMARUI'AN VILLAGE-RUV1SHD 2000 ~oo. QRATI~Aa~ 431430: EV~kS 1~A1ilG1Ve~X l~1tAlNAttE 222220,000 2j24,000 DRAINAGE 0810.31 SHAD OAKS DRAINAC's 17,E 17,000 pl►WAt~I 4110-24Il9 S~ 117C ~RApl 5 565,000 AIRPORT 041906 CONSTRUCT 14,046,1 1, APRON 611 1~ ARPAtt~' Q1?19Q7 91000 86, 6 ~~113 ACpu,~tTlaN ~4~ 13'49': ~ixN Not{x6i 1x9;944 noD AIRPORT 001908 EX113NDlID N6R* RUNWAVICAXIWAV 1500' 45,0, !,252,900 91, 195000 117501,0(* 11945, ODD AIRPI)1tT 00!909 .4X~CI1`!'IY~ 18i 'pARK.IN~# A,P~34N I0o'7t154 f RPORT 061916 COMMERCIAL S13RVICB APRON 480'XISO' 2'41400 218,000 242o00 PI.AIgNING 041S07 6RAUI 10AX!(JJ~{a~ N1VERSf YORE- It 17b,000 196,000 PLANNING 091511 IiIGHWAY 77 BEAUTIk6A' TION 378'0 395,000 5 ,000 LIBRARX 007003 110RARX PJJ Sn II 276 000 278 ,OW 556,000 20,UU PARKS 006205 lx,,i(A CENTER EJfPANSION/RENOVATION 1,700,000 1,7QO,000 284 001 '.1,250,000 1)25(1,000. 7,50( Hl/1.9/1}~ EJB, tl,4£J; 1 027 566 07.36; Canferencn of Mayors Page 3 SENT BY~ XEROX Tolocopier 70171 1-28-92 4~02PM 99.4 VIA SUREFAXI# 31 d A `I RAY TO GO" A Sum)y of City I11683tracture/Pub11c Works projects please complete, using as MAY pagers as na:essary, and return by Tuesday, yel,rusry 4, to Judith HurMU at The United $tatas Conferenee of Mayors, 1620 Eye Street NW, Washington, D,C, 20006, Pax 202.293.2352, phones 202.293.7330, None otMayor Mayor BOO Castleberry Denton, 'T'exas City Contact for 1FoUow•up Rick Svehln IM ut City pfnttngajr Phone (817) 566-8307 ]FAX (817) 566-8236 't'ype of Project Total Cost Funds Needed Number of (brief description) of project In 1992 1992 Jobs Created Nottingltnut Street Now Coils trnettoll $ 400,000 $ 400,000 20 - 25 Jlobeott Bridge Reconstruction $ 115,000 $ 115,000 15 - 20 Cooper Creek bridge Reconstruction $ 120,000 $ 120,000 15 - 20 City-wide S:ldewnik RaconstrUotiott $ 1,250,000 $ 1,230,000 20 hi.rpori: briway Overlay $ 1,068,000 $ 11068,000 20 Airport Mummy fxLettsioo (11100') $ 112501000 $ 1,250,000 30 5tuarL/Sunnydale. St. Uriiinage. (Now Construction) $ 227,000 $ 227,000 15 Longridgo St. Drainage (Now Construction) $ 485,000 $ 485,000 J5 damns Street Drainage (New Construction) $ 146,000 $ 146,000 10 sor Syr xwx ?6,ecooiee 701); i-28-92 com 99« vfa Sr~RrFax a 3,. a WADY To rJON ' A surrey of City IQ&"9ructurUt+ublic Works Projacts I P1ea.a complete, uiln~ ae "=Y pagai as nocasa acy, and return Fry i, to Judith 8arNg at The Unitacl Stater Conftrencd ofMeyyaan,'1620 Eye9~trtat NW, 'a"hinaton, A,C, 70006, Foxy 10240,79Ka, Phoney 102M507~60, Nams Of HAYgr 11oh CnWuburry C 41Y OuUtou, TUXIIa o~ C*a ad ftr >Poiiow.ttp Joollzt Orr pbo" 817/383»7717 FASO 7 . 2 ~.es~r..wuwrrr.. 't'ype of Project Totsi Cwt Funds NasdW of (brief da,tcription) of project in xm Number 199 Jabs Cunatruotion of a 15,000 uquaro foot ~1,125,00t~,00 library branch located in southouot $625.000,00 .30 40 Banton at Taaaloy Lane & Lillian I Miller Parkway } SENT BY; XEROX TofecoQler 70171 1-20-92 1 4102PM y 99 VIA 5UREFAX4 31 4 "MARY TO Gb" A Survey of City In&UtructureM'Ifte Works Projecu please compteta, using as many pages as necesssry, and'retu= by Tuesday, Pebr wy 4, to Judith Burrell at The United States Conference of Mayors, 1620 4e Street NW, Washington, D,C, 20006, Paxi 202.293.2332, Phones 202034330, 1 I a NVA4 of mayor Bob Castleberry City City of Denton Contact Mr 'Follow-up phone (817) 566-8270 VAX (817)_566-8 236 Type of Project 7 Total Cost Funds Needed Number of (brief description) of Project In 1992 1992 jobs Created 1 ' Upgrade, renovaie, and repair $2,000,000 $10000,000 15 to 20 existing park system (15 parks approximately 600 acres) Upgrade abandoned railroad $200,000 $200,000 10 into a trail system Develop a greenway .vilong $1,0000000 $11(100,000 10 to 15 Pecan Creek with trail system 111/1✓I JL Ull, 11,,11 I .~.i .wu ui.Ju, fdll!ltid' ulluu Ul I1/li)L1PS it1yG c. Y SENT 9Y: XEROX Telecopler 7017: 1-26-92 4 01PM ; 99-, VIA StJREFAX,q 21' c 01 . THE UNITED PATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620 BYE S7)iti" :qOATH"ST WASK-413TON, p,C, 2M TRUPHON2 (302)297'73$0 PAX (202) 293'2352 MYNOND pIY!7N ~ _ ltiya,ol o,ron fQZ Ugly" 28, 1992 ~j 1'Ip1 LLfiel lk.Ltt #ilip!a1.10iYNAl'1 .»f,+.wluL1.e Ul2Ci13NT MHMUI#ANptJM ' AO~~iaf~aJM do Jprlnl, - lei3 0Ic 1'ql k'37l1~aielaWIpwaoa ~1(,yaielo.y&Yt6 IrR1 f TIiOMAS COCHHAtV wM~u i~fi~non n~, 7o v,1 A RJrf 1NPRMTRUCrJP. X 9tMVEV. PUSUC WURKs pRo)ECTS ,RRAI0y TO GOI' ntl~a hn>i/e ACTION NEED11) NOW ON QY EsTIONNAIRE ~idre~u~nlmMrt AIVAAO 6p. UV r XC,oCAALt This memo Is my foffowwp to the letter I cant earlier today. 41+4DlNl4 w'N 1fAlIW~01 u~ N' 11 wilvw Pi NybN~unl With the Adoption of the United Statcs Conference of Mayors 1992 MUNAAIo~ ,,l o ° Emergency jobs and Artq•Recessionary initiative at our 60th Winter 8leeting (wet ~~1,4><I.!week, and with the growing Congresslanal inamentum for enacting an economic Y 6 m "m 1I( 1 stimulus package, we are sreklnq help froth your clry to build our case for `u14%loypimi, , W taiC federal assistance, )j1l iKI te?'1P0>,,,, V!tI f~;pr ~ At the concluslon of the Winter Meeting last week, Conference President 17~0„X1M1U Raymond L. Flynn of Boston told the mayors, "We need to provide our Senators i "l+fawa'dud and BMpresentatlves with a list of what can be done to put, people to work, and t"" we need is as wan as you can get Jr to us," pn9a tou ~ "',`1,l'"1°I'fl fR~7tls Attached Is our "ItUDV TO 001 surveey This survey will answer the most "f4ls la1°s1` Important and consimently.Asked questions In Woshlngtan over the last monthr 1tl.~lii~lU~}~'iw°MUad Styy4 NlilN 01~41r pA1ry TON rMO`IY ffn''1P10!i Oeel Lp1 A1t11:N 8fA61/~ ■V \id I~t .t t'nJ~,t~'/olMind.oA p0 1)IIJf37 lt~Nd OIkX1.VJ h01 a77dNl,.N'b!4 tth 1161kAb &AY WON a pf>~O,ltlD~ IIUW MLtG?u~ la nW~rly~IyN~f~#yV~ff,4~.n I'I' r~7'~}..~.+.~''i'1~'~9g pT~tECr,~ p~Ny9W d~yplbA NiM!'T$*LMA6q 1!`Yare}tx,nawS2$t Tl7BJ'tP.~hULn nampump 'IIro t~ John ao~ 'M Y 4~ul„ Include xnd Idantlfy as many finds of lnfrutruature/publlc works projects xA~fVlel~1ddy..0_A as posslblel street, road, bridge, public transit, sewer, housing, schooi Ill.`1~tfTx fr..~xlA construction, economic development, and any others, ~Ql , t" Tux We ask that you respond As fully as quickly ~'w9a~11~5,wt # h' possible and return the it ;A completed sutvty form to us by nett Tuesday, February 4, For any addltiotw vP It Infotrrtttlon oC qutlttlatts cancettitJng nur "RJIAt>'Y TO pq" survey, "Afb me or Judith >rturrell here At The Conference, Resporms the am by taxiact ZWAl' u9~1 " (202) 293,23521 by overnight delivery or mall) 1620 Ilya Street, NW, Washington, II,C, 20006. A1vNw,v aMan i 01/29/92 08:0212; 1 017 %6 02361 voliftwelici of Mayors 11t1ffc 2 SENT W XEROX Telocopior 70171 1-28-92 112109PM 99~ VIA SUREFA.X14 2, 4 CO?v~ , NN THE UNITED STAFFS CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620 0n $nuH71 NOWrt EST WAWNaroN, Ot 20M 9 PL6PHONb (202) 2937330 FNS (202) 2932332 re~~N~at' p,~YMtlNU 1, FLY}M {d1y014f RNN/+ `I VitoPnoil4mp aariuary 28, 1992 w4;elot1r( PUS 111140 15 t15 IOM11dG ~pIMF ;058111 61mnS6 C 1 ONO iaesl7~ria ricer Mayan a The United States Conforgnao of Mayors Z''XAautive M.t I Committee, Advisory Hoard and standing Committee %Iiimbarr ""M assembled cart weak at our 80th 19inter Meeting and 1cCl~Y040A1unanimbusiy adopted rocommandrd smex~gahay stimulus MIFSwyo o1CtJtie initiatives for congress to act upon immediate'i so that to W"f,'Aau H peaplm throughout', the nation can find jobs within our r ;lWlov°Mwk„~ cities, Attaohed you will find "The United stares ngIm,1e~1~uu conference of Mayors' 1,992 Emergenoy Cob.% and Anti- ~$u Recessionary initiatives" Y have aunt to congress today a i ~ vi WO, 4MM "OPM The massags from our member mayors -W both a ruw at Democratic and Republican here in wadhington was MOW" Do" olearr a national plan to provide ~oba to our oitizons a~~Ri~rie u~~ in cities oorosu the nation is needed now, vllyor of uuuv~e HKC1011l1109oa conggressional leaders have asked tor our M+yal a~{~n'~w reaommondations and our leadership htis respaaided. s' ;ay~6 tW Yesterday Conference President Raynand My»n tarwardod ~fdw't°an'ti «Your recommendationo to Hausa anal senatw leadeva, tDO~~y is oa Now, we nand' your help w" I r1a Wig city U C1AY 0104 + ;,uu~,~i,pUU sa , please contact your senators and House auto MKK'"Members immadihgaI2, Urge thorn to support our emerg6hoy PyisuiofhaVRyna initiatives to got the country moving r uin and provide a1;;y~ CUILAU~ift jobs for our unemployod, The attaohad ~nitiativor have n",'~AYK%P,arwiln than bipartisan support from our mayor. We need ' Please mend a letter 01Allm oml bipartirarl support i7lthin Congress. tw° r°atirOia today and provide mo a copyo toc~ vy ' tHIM6'i1H~a0" ~f thi19 wenk yo>a will qeb a short and simple a(~ questionnairs from no asking you to proV,ida us t7~?SkNHA` int'orma>»ian an thw number of public works pro loots that ou have "ready to go*" Ww need this informablon as wo. Ar+~s°yYei'o{iw Notify the need for immediate action now, ANNA AlIg la~r~~l0lM1~k~Ya Mtya}a Cot V l fHtl1lAS000IIRAH i 01/29/92 60.83.02; I Qt7 966 0236; C011rCI-nr0 ❑f Matj(3rs Paue 3 SENT 0: XEROX TDI M0lsr 7017 1-20°92 12:09PM 99" VIA SUREFAX4 3/ 4 aar►uary 29, 1992 Page Two your immediate assistance on these two action items is key, Ma ors, already on the front lines of this national recession, are united and ready to support and implement bold national aconomio recovery initiatives. nurinq the ninety days ahoad, we can be successful to gain Con ressional and White Houso juj,)port for our ehtergmmoy bipartisan logyalativ action that will provide jobs to our unemployed located within our cities, Act now, We need your help. Sincerely, Thomas Cochran Executive Director Attachment f, F- .ti II JAN V HE'D I' wry of omrom,, MXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 I M E M O R A N D U M Toi Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager FROMt Corrie oil, Management Services Administrator DATEI January 9, 1992 SUBJECTI 1992-97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM KICK-oFF The 1992 CIP kick-off will be held Wednewday, January 22nd in the City Council Chambers at 2130 pm. Those individuals who work directly with your departmentPs CIP budget process are encouraged to attend. Lloyd Harrell and John McGrane will give an introductionj and information packets will be distributed along with the CIP calendar. I look forward to this new budget season and hope to see you at the kick-off. AF'FOOI21 r f i 8111566,8200 DIPW METRO 434,2529 lam/ 01rY Of DENrON, rEXAS MUNICIPAL. BUILDING ! 215 E, MCKINNEY ! DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 9, 1991 1 To: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Jahn F. Mcarane, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: 1492 C1P FUNDING i 1 A preliminary review of the debt issuance for the Capital Improvement Program has been completed. The outlook for CTP funding has improved because of the action taken by the City of not_ is~Uin~ _new ciP debt fq the snag "o~ ~s 6 Attached as Exhibit A ig a sohe ule of existing`eb~ service on current outhe decreases to 95, ao7aA.U in 199293. T~tha tax base o City remaTne the same, or increases, then an additional amount 0f debt could be issued with no effect in the debt service portion of the tax rate. T have also included Exhibit a which shows the amount of 1986 authorized bonds that have not yet been issued. As you can see from the exhibit the total unissued amount is $10,922,000, There is now some flexibility for a sale of bonds. The suggested amounts to be sold in early 1992 are as followat streets $1,500,000 . ge 938,000 Airport (CO's issued as a match for FAA grants) -137,000 TOTAL S2 ~7~000. It is also recommended that since there are sufficient funds from previous saxes to allow for proceeding with the drawing of architectural rlana for the Library and Law Enforcement centers that those proceed accordingly, It may be possible to issue the remaining $575 0 and $21400,9 00 r__ esneot,~vely either in late 1992 or early 1593. 8171566-8200 DIPW METRO 4342529 p Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell December 9, 1991 Page 2 Also, from lilt to e, you will note that there is still. is in addadd ,000ition still t there o be issued for a second recreation center and in has been a previous $1,3000000 issued for an additional ce,nter, It would be our recommendation to allow the Parke Board to Proceed with their discussions and public hearings on the possibility of the utilization of those funds. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please advise. JFMCGlaf Attachments AFFOOODF 4 COW e 'f k 1 Bxh i b,it A OXTY OF DENTON - DEBT eOHEDULE Fisoal Year OUTSTANDING 0, Bo = 1991/1992 $ 5,4880704 1992/1993 5, 1993/1994 007,434 i 1994/1995 4f402148.1. 1995/,1996 3r961~031 1996/Z9A7 3429,846 3, 1997/1948 536,836 .199©/1999 2198819';3 1999/2000 21858,593 2000/2001 2,494,&00 2001/2002 2,151,488 2002/2003 2,039,253 2003/2004 1,931,603 2004/2005 1,593,8.63. 2005/2006 780,763 2005/2007 732,663 2007/2008 677,7tl0 2008/2000 439,000 .-.113 1 000 TOTAL Z i`~ FIRM 1 iE t F 1 P E b~~ g j AMOUNT OF BONnS AUTHORIZED 130T UNISSUED ~ • Streets $4,7321000 • Drainage 11365,00o • Library 575,000 • Law Enforcement 2,400,000 • Athletic Fields/Neighborhood Ctr, Roo Center (14M) Athletic Fields (450,000) 1,850,000 TOTAL j 1 s i { wry of oENTON, r!lXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM I DATEi ~ December 9, 1991 ~ TOr Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM; John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: 1992 CIP FUNDING A preliminary review of the debt Issuance for the Capital Improvement Program has been completed, The outlook for cip funding has improved because of the action taken by the City of not '.issuing new CIP debt for the Exhibit A is a schedule of existing two years; Attached as outstanding G.o. Bonds, As S serv.tce an current 1991-92 is $5,486,704 and this d you can see, ecreases to $51,007,,434 inpayment 1992-93. If the tax base for the City remains the same, or increases, then an additional amount of debt could be issued with no effect in the debt service portion of the tax rate, I have also _included E xhibit d which shows the amount of 1986 authorized bonds that been have issue total nunis ued amount isd $10,, 92yI00oa an see from the exhibit the There is now some flexibility for a sale of bonds, The suggested amounts to be sold in early 1992 are as followss • Streets $105001000 • Drainage • Airport (CO's issued as 938,000 a match for FAA grants) - 137,000 TOTAL "J21az It is, also recommended that since there are sufficient funds from ~ previous sales to allow for architectural plans for the LibraryeandnLawiEnforthe cem nt drawinCe ters that those proceed accordingly, It ma be the remaining $575,000 and $2,400,000 possible to or early 1993. either in latee1992 8171566.8200 DIPW METRO 484.2529 04 Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell December 9, 1991 Page 2 Also, from Exhibit 8, You will note that there is still is $1,400,000 still to be issued for a second recreation center and in addition, those has been a previous $1,30o,oo0 issued for an additional center, It would be our recommendation to allow the Parks Board to proceed with their discussions and public hearings on the possibility of the utilization of those funds, if you have any questions, or need any additional information, please advise. aF'McG saP Attachments AFFbOObF i , i F Exhibit CITY OF DENTON - DEBT SCHEDULE L Fiscal Year OUTSTANDING ~--30L G, 0_ BONUS 1991/1992 $ 5,488,704 1992/1993 51007,434 1993/1994 41402,481 1994/1995 3,961,031 1995/1996 31829,846 1996/1997 31536,836 1997/1998 2,,988r873 1998/1999 2,8581593 1999/2000 2,494r600 2000/2001 2,1511488 2001/2002 21039,153 2002/2003 11931,603 2003/2004 1,5931863 2064/2005 780,763 2005/2006 732,663 2066/2007 677,700 2007/2008 439,000 2008/2009 _13,000 TOTAL 4 AMOUNT OF BONDS AUTHORIZED BUT UNISSUED • Streets $4,732,000 • Drainage 1,3653 000 • bibrziry 57stoo0 u Law r;nforoetwnt 21400,000 • Athletia Pielda/Neighborhood Otr. ReO CHnter (1.4M) RthlOtio fields (450,000) 1,85 .000 TOTAL 0, 22.000 j , . r 4 AMOUNT OF BONDS AUTHORIZED BUT UNISSUED 1 • streets $4,7320000 • Drainage 11365,000 • Library 575,000 • Law En£arcemen+' 21400,000 r Athletic Fields/Neighborhood-Ctr Roo Center (1.4M) 850, OOQ - Athletic. Fields (450j000) TOTAL „10,9„ 2.000 SUGGESTED BOND SALE FOR 1992 • Streets $1, 500; 000 • Drainage 11365,000 • Airport (C.O.'a) 137,000 ♦ Law Enforcement Center 2,4001000 • Library _Z5.29.4. Subtotal $5,977,000 isst%anca and other costs TOTAL ,~iOU.000 i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS-PROPOSED $10,920,000 G.O.SONDS $10,920,000 LESS; NET FISCAL YEAR OUTSTANDING DATED CONSTRUCTION DEBT SERVICE .0, gnht1S EEB,1,199 f0Q EA6NINQ$ ~~EMENTS 1991/1992 $5,488,704 $5,488,704- 1992/1993 61007,434 $1,044,226 $682,966 6,488,704 f 1993/1994 002,481 1,037,100 6,439,681 If 199411996 3,9611031 1,281,860 612221881 199811096 3,829,946 1,266,083 5108009` 109611997 3,638,838 1,218,250 41753,086 { 19971.1998 2,,,988,873 11177,438 0661311 1998/i998 90666,693 111381826 3,997218r- 199917000 2,494,600 1,0990813 3,614,413 200017001 2,1511488 1,086, 000 30'237,488 ' 2001/2002 2,t'891183 -1,046,600 3008063 2002/2003 1,931,603 1,006,000 2,939,p03 200312004 1,593,683 884,600 2,659,3E33 i 3 2004/2006 780,763 924,000 1,71)4,783 j 200612006 7321883 8831600 1,A'16,163 4 ?00812007 877;700 943,000 10620,700 200712008 439,000 802,500 1,241,900 200812009 21 X10000 762,000 976,000 2009/2010 721,500 721,600 S 201012011 681,000 6810000 i 8 0 00 I i , ASSUMPTIO (1) 20 YEAR SCHEDULE AT 6,76% INTEREST FIATS (2) 6,0% IN'FE AE?SY EARNINGS c , +.in~Y\rYUL.~~ u+.H $10,920;000 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1992 DATEDO 2/ 1/92 FIRST CPN DUE; 1/ 1/93 PRINCIPAL DUE; 7/ 1 INTEREST DUE, 1/ 1 7/ 1 YEAR END PRESENT THIS $10,920 000 ISSUE GRAND TOTAL W~30 RE UIREMENTS PP I P L ~_.:IN ~ LL Ofi R1 U1RFEMENT ; 1992 $ 61488,704 $ $ $ $ 55488,704 1993 5,0071434 1,044,225 1,444,225 6,061,659; 1994 41402,481 300,000 737,100 1,037,100 5,439,5$1 1995 31961,031 545,000 MAO 1,261,860 50222,881 1996 3,829,845 675400 680,063 1,266,063 5,084;909 { 1997 3,536,$36 575,000 641,260 11216,250 4,763,086 1998 2,988,$73 675,000 602,438 1;177,438 4166,31( 1999 21858,593 675,000 563,625 11138,625 3;997,218 2000 2,494,600 676,000 524,813 1;099,813 3;694,41,3 2001 2,151,488 _600,000 486,000 1,0861000 31237,488 2002 21039,163 600,000 445,500 1,0451500 3,0041653 2003 1,931,603 600,oo0 405,000 10006,000 - 2,936,603 2004 1,593,863 1100,000 364,600 964,600 2;558,363 2005 780,763 600,006 324,000 924,000 1,7041763 2006 7321663 600,000 283,600 883,600- 15616,163 4 2007 677,700 600,000 243,060 8430000 1,620,700` 2008 439,000 6000,000 202,500 002 too 1,241,50.0 2009 2139000 6001060 162,000 762,060 975,000 2010 6005000 121,500 721,600 721,600 2011 600,000 91,000 681,000 681,000 2012 600,000 405500 640,600 640,600 $ 46,1271631 $ 10,920,000 $ 81669,364 $ 19,689,364 $ 64,716,995 INTEREST CALCULATED AT 6"750% FOR PURPOSES OF 1LLUSTRAtioN, <r~°el14 iEXAS MUNICIPAL REPORTS 1385OENTON, CITY OF Page 3 ' OUT SERVICE R(QUIRENENIS o' 6 i ~e, r/% DEBT SERYtCC AEQtlIAE)fENTS YA ENOG TOTAL SANITATION YR ENDA TOTAL 9.30 PRINCIPAL INTEREST REQNTS INCL IN TOTAL 9.30 PRINCIPAL INTEREST REQNTS 1991 2,845,000 2,168,461 5,013,461 202,266 1991 670,000 109,261 179,267 4992 MOMS0 -6010,154._...._...192r141- 1992 425,000 63,650 4710 S60 I 2,800,000 1,156,d59 41665,659 185,056 1993 425,000 28,715 451,175 1994 2,810,000 1,532,481 4,402,481 179,367 1995 2,650,000 11311,031 3,961,4p1 144 'WS TOTALS 1,521,000 189,592 1,209,592 , 1996 2,735,000 1,094,816 3,629,&6 160,08 1997 2,65S,000 061,836 3,936,836 144,423 OUT SEAYICE FUND NAMACa)te Join 1998 2,305,000 ,6$7,873 2,986,813 IIO,b7g 1999 2,360,000 498,693 2,8598,699 110,616 0.0. Debt Sorvide Requlr*wnts for ffscal year 2000 1,065,808 1,428,192 2,494,600 106,150 endfn9 9-30-91 ° (6,797 128, 2001 945,700 1.2 9,788 2,16 ,4r18 4,350 165 Funds all 0.0. 144s~ws 9.30.90 P )22 4)d 2utl2 888,)28 1,1b0,425 2,03,163 19,45) 1990 I&S Fund Tax 9 90s 3,649,237*A 2003 847,47 1,064,146 1,931,(103 14,900 2004 11.7 ,0 7 820,626 1,693,U63 53,900 +ln4lud4s daht servlco requir41tents on the ContraCtual a\ 2DOS 6114pp 0 160,763 180,763 Oblf9ations. 2006 611,0(0 117,653 732,663 "Debt sorvlce r40freeents on the Systee, 0,0. debt paid 20 Or)O 71,100 6}),700 dlreotty fro, thA Sanitation Fund, Debt service reGu pomonts 72,000 439,000 on the Serfes 1989 C/011 and the contractual obligetlons 2009 20 WO 13,000 m.000 Pafd from the Internal service Fund (motor Pool). TOTALS 31,161,730 18,029 037 49,210,167 1.863143i W01VTATIN OF $MF-SYPPORT1i KAY AIRPORt Y3 S+nltatfon (NCL IN TOTAL yearaendedsYe10p.90 flab3e for fiscal 1565,052 Last ROV000 Dond Debt Service 1992 (4' S for Year ending 9.30-91 g• IH4 440,350 Belem awllabl4 556S,052 I"S 41" p~;~~ System 0.0. Oabt Service for 1991 416"" year endlnrt99 9.30.9T 202,246 Percentage of Syst4r 8,0. Debt 4~22'ppp SO f•Supportfng 100E 1999 40;350 SMITATION SYST1i1 OF[1t YM walb" The following Condensed 23ae5ei ;~6 stat""It have been O0oMpcilid uefAU acdountm pprincfPlee ~ 12~ Cust4arrly awployed LO the deterid notion of fat royinues 5~p available for debt sarrfoe, and fn all instances dxdlude Ip~a 31,730 f6ent i ed to pitol. debt service Paywnb an4 exponditures 2004 J0, ldentffiM to taP1uL 200 it;6 p Pis~aI ycor Ended ~ 9.30.90 930 89 930.88 9.30.87 Revenws 53,412,961 $3,102, 16 J3,14$,9 1 $2 9 4q9g1 TOTALS 415,050 ExPMSas 2,847 88999 2 699949 2300,333 2;281,}20 SU APPENDIX (OR ACCAE71014 TABLE Net Incom 1 666,Us2 S 692,426 S 865,618 t 669,2}} DETAILS OF KWA 118L18AT1011 Kr UJIM ORItAndlt SM #MONItill Mir lollaE0 Date of Alaotxlt islued OITSTANOItlO Auehdeflklon Purpose Aathoriedd to Date wisswil Limited NolAtenance tax 2116,191 ; 12.13.16 St A $ 1,731,000 (3,004,000 ! 4,}32,000 11}iNI FVA,P PIRTYIFIMAKE CONTRACTUAL OBLI0t1 12.13.66 Trafflo Tap 11 " R r Eo a IMP 2,I, 1, 65,ppp 3.01.11 JIJ 1 {118.00341 (Will IfA•Ab ftsil) 12.13.8¢ ParRe 4,1 , ~ >~1 12.13. 125, 61S,OpD NTYS 1.1 12-13.86 LwrEn~oru• S.16t DotiCnat 5210,000 Wt Court N60 on Opkl CaaPlnx 2,600,000 200.000 2,100,000 11,260!11 POD PpOPEATY MAW CONTRACTUAL 081.1811 Totals 520,162,000 (9,830,000 (10,912,000 UR'90QTt0) ¢1r051:~0I93 13) 1 (3!•1) (1091 (FR•ROINSRD) tPE~N3'OI~aFUkDOLtN1l[TtireAll and ousl11*101101 itm oliyt"i If 1.h$ untClpil t Pt11rA of ff 6,30% 42611 97/ 51,260,000 U 5{ Segiit badupltylp 9, I µt;j,~tayaes 6110 PdrtfClPatA 10 the Non Optional C4vere0 $4116y"s Of the City of WWII Contribute 6% of gross TOTAL covered salary, The City's COAWWtio8 Is detonined annually 51,520,000 byy Utuarlal study A$ a Pdrdeet of frost covered payroll, For PAYING MENT/R6OISTAM tM Mender year of 1991, this rate Is 6,38%, (31.1) NCN1 Tax$$ IRtlons) Dank, Fort North 1X1.00341 AaMHtrwse Texas N,A., Dallas n W Y of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TCXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) EQ6•SaV OfRoo of the CIty Manager M E M 0 X A N D U X j Tot Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager rRoMt Rick Svehla, Doputy City Manager DATE$ December 6, 1991 SUBJECTt Update on Existing CIP Council asked for an update on the existing t85 and $86 bond issues, We have attached a list of projects in each issue, a1id we have also added a shoot showing the exceptions. The 1985 issUo is complete with the exception of two projects, Locust street from Congress to University for $682,000 and Elm Street from Highland to Eagle for $314,000. We have used a small amount of funds from these two projects to do inlet work both on Elm and Locust near Pecan Creek. Council might recall that these two projects were set aside since the State came in and rebuilt those two sections right after the issue was passed, Since then, the Council has taken action to reserv4 these funds to provide the $1 million worth of match money that will be needed for the U.S. 77 project. In the 1986 issue, all of those projects have also been completed with the exception of the followings F.M, 2181 (Teasley ;Lane)' U.S. 3'77 (Fort Worth Drive), U.S. 380 (University Drive) and Loop 2R8, Council may recall that there are also four bui,ldings'on hold, Those being the law enforoement/oourt aompp16x, library and two recreation centers. Finally, the athletio fiold improvements at North Takes Park have not been completed yet# As ;a footnote to these, we have also included the latest indications from the Highway Department on letting schedules for the highway projects, 7 am sure Council will remember in our discussion about the Moore Building in recent weeks, and we believe that will incorporate Police and the court complex. Finally, z am surer Council also remembers the recent announcement for the half million dollar grant that Parks and Recreation was able to obtain, This will be used in conjunction with the funding that in left for the improvements to`the North Lekes to aco,amplish all of the goals set during the discussions for the 1986 bond issue, Council may also remember that last Tuesday they awarded the drainage bids for the Nottingham project. Since our Street Department will be the general contractor for that project, that does conclude all of the M { Lloyd V. Harrell December 5, 1991 Page 2 street programs in the 1966 issue with the exception of the above mentioned highway projects. If you or the Council has any further questions, we would be happy to try to answer them at you leisure. Ric Sve la Deputy City Manager RSSbw AMMOOO86 Attachments i i r ;i 9. r IS PROPOSITION NO, 1 19901991 S7RemitTRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC CONTROL ParlWorlhbrlvefJame+Slrealtlralnege 1_.ge.uu . 1066 sod I TOTAL 19,4ta,mo LIIlion M111erParkweYWldenln0 S 450,000 4A: Wl06 290000 PROPOSITION NO, 3 Or+daT1s11fOBlgnaleaC+ttall8oullvard 10'000 ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXPANSIONI land UnlvetellY 01Ivs 145,000 New 8ig"i Instaltallon! 64,000 1966,1969 S16neNIt4o0p266endU,S.080 26,000 AnlmalControl Canler0xpanefon 1^„165.000 ttdHe sludy 40,014 Evom hril Sidewalk . 16,000 . TOTAL 1 MOW 81d**Alk on keraulas 11,199,000 t969.1988 PROPOSITION NO. 4 Woodrow LeoWldentngendlmproveminte A26i00 FIRE STATION AND EQUIPMENT )sbulld Flung I1e11 Avenue 1966.1980 (with prNAnt ollonmanr) 1M,1>DO Mingo ROMT1e111eAhdOr+laa0elmprovemIntl No Bt+ilon 1100'00° Toss* LanslmotovelMMS 20000 Pita e4ulpmenl 200,000 Tfil sight dynehrdnlallon 900,000 TrA1fk sl6nala 61,626,000 TOTAL weai9e9 PROPOSITION NO, 5 P,M,2111(TSU1eyLsrssl:Four lsrl6Dlvidw 260'000 ATHLETIC FIELD8INElGIMSARH04D Win 1011,11 to Davis $treet feis$ 00PAvln9 hnprovsment/ south 91)yen Row t'a,96u AND SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS Algol 8 [mi ro rontats(bola DdvA to IH486Arv104 flew) 40,000 16161061 / ,0401000 10161910 Cost rkorNflldrr Center! ' I t 200 iM0 R4 P00 000 AlhNtlo Y Irld DAWIo0r11sAt,"' Loop 11y~00N P1r(blaelim Pour Will Dlvfdad it 1,160,000 ' Prom UA. 0fq {out i0 flouNvrrd' 600,000' t0A9.106A ! i useerwftblo•(wm l w AdW 1•raw U.s. (I.oeu/,y to L6of 2tM seller Cent4lr 4EIlpenruon 1 160.o°D 1 puna10r1efNotlin0ftfun(PrqM U;s,0601oMM1/e11o~0)r' fI000t70; A4fiNIkf"bwMo"Fit MOW U.lla66lMgtno(•'f++p Aa(ul+ItkA, ~~111300,Orb `Yloo-t/61 loftbioe6 ~ )solution Cantsf 61,0110,900 Pon weAh Dtwo,N's, 3m: Pout LI MO,vlded r ~s00~i AIhlelro MW Wwbprnerll 260000 Prom IN46u to P.M. 1600 ~t 61660000 oundruollon of 0"Is almost 61,181.OdJ 1000149t p,166AOD f4or6mlofi Contort 61, TOTAL A"W PWid Wrelop"t PROPOSITION NO, 2 6,,/6a,aoo ORAINAGE TOTAL 1!1'10,000 !066,19'9 6x;606 PROPOSITION NO, 8 ta~inrowkbroln•p! LIBRARY IMPROVEMENTS yioodfow BddOS 110,o00 Peden CINk brAlneOe 60000 1666.19116 Avdrx t.Ane DiA1114940 N,000 1400,060 8urnlnGGTreebtelde0+ WON wtNoNexpe tion,PhNel Study OelintalnaR► 26,000 199bi091 61 t - - 0f FloguNlilldn! 6IW,1100 Com91e1bnof LlbrAryExpenllon 1069.1966 TOTAL; 61,090,906 wdloAonltngloi'lnP9e 6 MOW PROPOSITION NO, 7 Wnnlag No flee if tO snatel0e 160naga 000 Sul 600 LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTJyg1COURT COMPLEX loolwYtome br+ine0e j 969,000 t966•l969 Pltnl lot LAW Bnloramenl CantorlCowl Complex 5200,000 IONA1969 ~ undale rd a slot ofiiAage Pion 1 '26,000 1989.1690 !'691990 U y Enforasmanl Cenlerldoun Complex, Phsee 1 6 600,000 S 1 1690• IRAs h Loa,abniueyDanape 625,000 DlA,n! 060,000 Completion of Low it, EnlorGemeMCenteuCourlOompiex S},200, Srna NfSunnYdall Dlaroaprrn,albvltnPnlxnNolly.FlNlArra ~~'wo t0T7tL 112'00'000 I 11,296,009 it it 1 EXCEPTIONS 1986 BOND ISSUE HIGHWAY PROJECTS o Pa-Mil 21819921 (1-35E to 2 mi. South) Late Summer, Early F o U.S. 380 (Locust to Loop 288) 1995 or later 1 n U.S. 377 (1-35E to P.m. 1830) 1994-95 o Loop 298 (U.S. 380 to I-35E), 1995-2000 DRAINAGE o Stuart/Sunnydale o Hollyhill o James Street BUILDINGS o Law Enforcement Center/Court Compiox o Library o Recreation Centers ATHLETIC FIELDS v North Lakes 1985 STREET BOND ISSUE o Elm - Highland to Eagle o Locust Congress to University I ?1 r: OVERLAY 1985 ` Boundaries Street Name From _ 10 CaAt Miles Avenue C Mulberry Oak 15,798 20 Bolivar Congress university 40,054 .80 Bln Prairie Highland 7►899 410 Magnolia Now Asphalt Hinkle 14,445 125 Elm Congress Oak.` 26,588 SO Stuart Kings Row Coronado 340667 .`60 910 Mulberry prairie 150798 .20 Hercules Picadilly Sheraton 17,334 .'SO Locust Hickory Oak 5,628 .05 Withers Oakland Mingo 17,334 .30 Robinwood Everson University 34,668 ,60 tisley. Woodford Hattie 8,085 120 Locust' Oak McKinney 41431 0S Paisley Pratte Ruddell 13,857 .40 First Bolivar Locust 8,467 .15 Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywood 40,445 .70 Kin Row Sherman Yorkshire 230118 30 Mockingbird McKinney Oriole 1001 28,889 :50 Locust McKinney Congress 150798 20 Emerson Freedom Wilsonwood 86,669 1'.50 Austin McKinney Mulberry -81666 15 Audra McKinney End of Divide 29,480 .30 Locust Mulberry Hickory 1 5,628 .05 McCormick ParVin Willowwood 17,334 ,30 Hollyhill Ridgecrest Tennyson 630557 1610 Avenue D Highland 1H•35 14,445 25 Total Overlay $595,282 9.85 t t W;i REPAVE L Street Name From Boundaries To Colt Mile Hillcrest Scripture 47,Qi8 Carroll Northridge Rossy- X65 Oak 290940 Austin Bolivar .,50 Hercules Redstone Stuart 17424 S Stuart Hercules Kings Row 260112 ;Z Mingo Withers Mockingbird 116,160 .20 Old North Road University Mill Pond 270720 2.20 .3S Pratte RR:( -S, McKinney 17t424 Nottingham University Windsor 57,869 X30 Greenwood Cherrywood Sherman ..8 Locust Univergit 12,616 0 glm y Sherman Drive S 66! University Congress ' Paisley Nettie 55,440 .70 Pertain Mingo Rudd ell 4,356 ,16 Hobson Lane Teasley Wayne 4$56 .10 Congress Oakland PM-1830 50,094 ills Locust Oa Eagle Ponder 55,176 95 Mulberry 47,916 50 Total Repave 596,783 9.45 { 1 r# RBp i 19.9.5 Straet Name Boundaries Fr°-° To Stuart Selene C- Miles Hickory Hercules Pershin Carroll Cedar 1230595 30 Locust g Stuart Atlas 105,045 Hickor Sherman 790020 Hickory Teasley 10 Cedar _ Orr 4730218 •20 Dallas Dr, Austin 116,950 .55 1.70000 20 1130 198b Hickory Avenue C Hickory Avenue C Bonnie Brae 372,479 Avenue C Welch .70 llenwood Windsor Mulberry 200o547 .40 Welch Mulberry University 1 .70 Hickory 38,5.~73.tt 7,6~r,~'t49 . 70 1,5/~rL4~ Z -10 / 1987 Oak Bolivar Magnolia New Asphalt .tagoe 961, 140 Bolivar Northridge Bolivar P 176,941 1.00 fry Scripture University 471 615 `30 West oak ae Oak ;740 .r0 Dallas Lane Blasannie BrDriva Ja$tle 113s740 X20 RYan Road 10 70 ,00 Bonnie Brae Windsor i Bonnie Brae University University Audra End of Dfvide Scri ture 3Q1,S57 ( Bernard Paisley 899,984 X90 Locust Port Worth Dry ,6I►244 , 7S ! Congress 6I0302 .10 University 682 095 ;yp 2 r0, 1 2. 1 8g Bonnie Brae Riney; Scripture IH»35 Windsor Wrist Oak IH-35' Bonnie Brae 397;876 Avenue A Highland 547,907 X65 131m Highland McCormick 2070876 ,30 Engle 210,028 31 SI6 . 55 2198M 1 2 ;`I; r' } i , CITY ~ COUNCIL r_ r . ~~~~O~~Qo f D A N~ i ~Q~O ra v t m+~~p ' * b~~CCCO G .4111, M f } f -CITY F y= COUNCIL. 1 bO~°°npo 000 ~ b~ _ I~ O M co~c ti . CONSIDERATIONS FOR alp FACILITY H{AWAaZ LENT CIP COSTS* 1. Library Phase 11 (20r000 sq.ft., includes 2.50 mil. ^ furniture) 2. Library Land Phase 11 (7 acres) $00,000 3. New Roofs 614,428 Civic Center 121,180 Senior Center (old) 27,068 North Lakes 50,000 Dania Library (if not done with 120,000 112G increase) Visual Arts 121,180 Service Center 1-75,000 4. ADA Renovations Unknown 5. Nette Schultz Courts (,if not approved 39,000 this year, $35,000 now + inflation) 6. New Parking Lot - Civic Center 175,000 7. City Hall Fire Sprinklers 105,000 8. Energy Management Systems 250,000 9. Paint 6 Buildings 200,000 10. Remodel Fire station #1 in to Offices, 205,000 (10,000 sq.ft, x $15 + $55,000 Roof) 7,1. `rear Down Fire Station 01 300,000 ($20 x 16,000 sq.ft.) 12. Phase 11 of Spade Master Plan 7..3 mil. * Estimated l2/6/9L t, CONSIDERATIONS VOR OIp piRX8 AND RECREATION The following protects are not ranked in order of priority. This will need to be done by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, CIPP CSTS* _1. Civic `Center Pool Renovation/Expansion $7.. 0 mil. 2. Indoor Pool with DISD (1/2 cost) 2.588 3. Additional Funds for Northeast Cantor mil, 0 4. Upgrade Existing Park System .80 mil. 50 mil. 5. Develop Practice Fields on DT,D Pro cart 1. Rayzor,,Horman, Oinnings p y .225 5 mil, 6. Additional Funds for Southeast Center 7. North Lakes Park Development .80 mil, 2 lighted softball, 3 soccer, 1.70 mil. 2 multipurpose, 4 tennis 8. Northeast Community Park (20 to 30 acres) 75 mil 9. Southeast Community Park (20 to 30 acres) 75 mil. 10, Neighborhood Park Development (10 to 15 notes) .25 mil, Teasley, Briarcliff, Rayzor, McNair, Ginnings, iiinkel 11, Neighborhood Park Acquisition (10 to 15 acres) .30 mil. Mockingbird, Teasloy, Township 11 12. Evers Park Acquisition/Development 4 lighted baseball, 2 lighted football, 75 mil. parking, trail syntem, concession/ restrooms, 5 acre addition 13. Denia Park Acquisition/Development 2 lighted softball, 4 softball 1.50 mil. trail system, concession/restroomsrktng, 25 acre addition 146 Dania Center Renovation 15. North Lakes Center Renovation •25 mil. 16, North Lakes Amphitheatre and Perkin ,25 mil. 17. Pecan Crook Greenbelt Development 1,00 mil 75 mil. 18. Evers Park Expansion (Tripp Property) X50 mil. 19. Mack Park Acquisition/Development . 2 lighted baseball, parking expansion, .75 mil. 10 acre addition 20. New Community Pool (does not include land) 2,00 mil. 21. North Lakes Center Expansion (8,000 sq,ft.) 1,00 mil. and Renovation 22. Denia Center Expansion (8,000 sq.ft.) and 1.00 mil. Renovation 23, Pilot knob/Huht Property pavalopm®nt (park and outdoor education center) 1,50 mil. 24. Golf Course (18 holes and clubhouse) 3.50 roil. 25, Denton Branch Rail Trail Development .2u mil, k V 5 Page 2 CTP COS9"~* 26. Avondale Park Acquisition/Development .10 mil. 27. Trail Development 25 mil, 28. Civic Center Park improvements 2.00 mil, Estimated j a i } l2/6/9i CONSIDERATIONS FOR CIP ` FACILITY MANAaEME2IT Q2p COS Sik 1. Library Phase 11 (20,000 sq.ft., includes 2.50 mil. furniture) 2. Library Land Phase 11 (7 aches) 5000000 3. New Roofs 614,428 Civic Center 1210580 Senior Center (old) 27,068 North Lakes 500000 Denia Library (if not done with 120p000 Visual Ark/24 increase) 12 Service Center 1,180 175,000. 4. ADA Renovations Unknown 5. Nette Schultz courts (if not approved 39,000 this year, $35,000 now + inflation) 6. New Parking Lot - Civio Center 175,000 7. City Hall Fire Sprinklers 105,000 8 Energy Management Systems 250,000 9. Paint 6 Buildings 200,000 10. Remodel Fire Station ,#1 in to offices 205,000 (10,000 sq,ft, x $t5 + $55,000 Roof) 11. Tear Down Fire Station #1 300,000 ($20 x 15,000 sq.ft.) 12. Phase 11 of 51,aoe Master plan 1.3 mil. * Estimated 12/6/91 r s, CONS:{DERATIONS FOR OIP PARKS AND RECREATION The following projects are not ranked in order of priority. This will need to be done by the harks and Recreation Advisory Board. CIP C057,~5* 11 Civics Center Pool Renovation/expansion $1.88 mil, 2. Indoor. Pool With DISD (1/2 cost) 2.50 mil. 3. Additional Funds for Northeast center ,80 mil, , 4. Upgrade Existing Park System 1.50 mil, 51 Develop Practice Fields on DISD Property 25 mil. Rayzor, Borman, Ginninga ' 6. Additional. Funds for Southeast center 480 mil. 7. North Lakes Park Development 1.70 mil. 2 lighted softball, 3 ooccer, 2 multipurpose, 4 tennis 8. Northeast Community Park (20 to 30 acres) 75 mil, 9. Southeast community Park .(20 to 30 acres) .75 mil. 10. Neighborhood Park Development (10 to 15 acres) ,25 mil, Teasley, Briarcliff, Rayzor, McNair, Ginnings, Hinkel 11, Neighborhood Park Acquisition (10 to 15 acres) .30 mil. Mockingbird, Teasley, ToWnshi.p it 12. Evers Park Acquisition/Development .75 mil, 4 lig'.tod baseball, 2 lighted football., parking, trail system, concession/ restrooms, 5 acre addition 13. Dania Park Acquisition/Development 1.50 mil, 2 lighted softball, 4 softball, parking, trail system, concession/restrooms, 25 acre addition 14, Dania Center Renovation .25 mil, 15, North Lakes Center Renovation .25 mil. 16, North Lakes Amphitheatre and Parking 1.00 mil. 17. Pecan Creek greenbelt Uevelopmont 75 `mi'l. 18. Evers Park Expansion (Tripp Property) .50 mill 19, Mack Park Acquisition/Development .75 mil. 2 lighted baseball, parking expansion, 10 acre addition 20, New Community Pool (does not include land) 2.00 mil. 21. North Lakes Center Expansion (81000 sq.ft.) 1,00 mill and Renovation 22. Dania Center Expansion (8,000 sq,ft.) and 1.00 'mil. Renovation 23, pilot Knob/Hunt Property Development 1.50 mil. (park and outdoor education center) 24, Golf Course (18 holes and clubhouse) 3.50 mill 25, Denton Branch Rail Trail Development ,20 mil. 12/6/71 i Page _ 2 CO ;Sit 266 Avondale Park Acquisition/Development I 27. Trail Development ,10 mil, 28. Civi4 Center Park improvements .25 mil 2.00 Mil. * Estimated f 12/6/91 r de4b I ~P,f~dN. OFF=CF. OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Claiborne, Chairman, Planning & zoning Commission FROM: Joe D. Morris, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: OPINION NO. 88-03--Approval of Revised Utility CIP by Planning & zoning Commission DATE: March 180 1988 You have requested this Department to address whether the City Council may legally approves revisions to the q proved utility Capital Improvements Plan (CIP as recommended by the Public Utility Board ("Board") without first sobmittiog those propposed revisions to the Planning and Zoning Commission ("Commission") for its review and recommendation, We understand that your question was prompted by the following events. In the latter part of 1987, the Board recommended that some utility projects previously approved in the 1987-99 utility CIP be deferred to subsequent years. The Board's recommenda- tions were forwarded to and approved by the Council without. the review and recommendation of the Commission. You question whether, under the Charter, the recommended revisions of the utility CIP could be approved by the Council' without being submitted to the Commission for its review and approval. The powers and duties of the Commission in are set forth in Article X of the Charter. In reference to the CIP, section 10.03 (a)of that Article provides in part as follows; (a) The Planning and Zoning Commission shall: (6) Submit annually to the City Manager, not less than ninety (90) days prior to the beginning of the budget year, a list of recommended capital improvements which in the opinion of the Commission ought to be constructed during the forthcoming five (S) year period (Such list shall be arranged in order or proferenceo with recommendations as to which year, and the Cityy Manager shall forthwith furnish a copy of such recommendations to each member of the council), } OPINION N0, 88-03 MARCH 18, 1988 PAGE TWO The powers and cluties of the Hoard are set forth in rtl X11 Of the Charter. In reference to the CIP, section 1l.AUBiofethak article provides in part as follows: Sec, 12,08 Power and Duties of the Public Utilities Hoard . . (e) The board shall submit annuall and Zoning Commission (for y to the Planning Incorp report), not l(sss than one hundredratwent in its days prior to the beginning of the budget y (120) list of recommanded capital 'i in the opinion of pthe arprgveatents ywhich, construi:ted during the forthcoming'fivet to be period. Such list shall be arranged in order ear preference, with recommendations as to which projects should be constructed in which year. The cit:ed provisions of the Charter aontemplar:e that the five year CIP approved by Council will be made after receiving the report of the Commission, which will contain' the respective recommendations of the Commission and the Board, Since the Hoard is required to prepare and make its recommenda- tions on the utility Cip for 'line orporrition" in the Commission's report, it is apparent that the Commission and Board are to prepare separate reports. The Commission is to prepare a non- utility CIP and the Board is to prepare a utility CIP. The final CIP report: of the Commission to be given I;o the Council is to contain the recommenda- tiona of both entities. To answer your question, we must determine whether the Charter. intended that the Commission would have the responsibility duty of revie~ling and approving the Board's report andrecomr mendations on the utility CIP, prior Co sending the final CIP report and recommendation to the Council, Obviously, if the Commission has no duty to review and make any recommendation ort the Board's utilityy CIP recommendations, therea would be no reason for the Commission to review the Board's recommendations on revisions of the utility CIP. } OPINION NO, 88-03 MARCH 18, 1988 PAGE THREE i Although the provisions of the Charter elating to t he recommendations by r the Commission and 8aerd relating CIA does ( not specifically provide £or the Commission to review s approve the Board's recommendations for the tility Clp, We must construe those particular provisions in ure£erenoe to general review of the whole Charter so as to ascertain the overall intent of the Charter. Article X of the Charter also 'provides that the Commission has the duty to make, amend, extend and addto the master plan for the physical development of the city." [section 10.03 (1)J. The "master plan is described in sec, provides that the ''muter plan for, the physical development which the city shall show the Commission's recommendation for the development of the city", things, "the general location handlext ntY fnolude, among other The Powers of the Commission in reference topimplementationso£ the 'master plan" are set forth in section 10.05, in part, as followst Sec, 10,05 Legal Effect of Master Plan No street, park or other public way, no public building or structure andnorbublicrutilit, whether publicly or privately -owne , s a e constructed or authorized in the City, nor shall any real property be acquired by unloss the location and extentthethe reof shall have been submitted to an approve ~y the commissien~ that in case of diaapproval, the;commiss'ionrUahall within thirty (30) 'days communicate its reason to the council, which shall hava the power to overrule such disapproval,' and, upon such overruling, the council or the appropriate office, department or agency shall have poirer to proceed, (emphasis added) These Provisions of the Charter relating to the master plan and ' the physical development of the City clearly recognize the planningg furiction of the Commission, exerc.isi,ngg its duties as a Planning CThe Commi, ommis i ns,a~ has when responsibility under the Charter for recommending and reviewing those policies and actions that impact the physica.i development of the City, including approval of the location and extent of public utility projects. OPINION NO. 88-03 MARCH 181 19813 PAGE FOUR 1 TC would be i.m o. P Bible to reconcile respective provisions re the Chartthe er regarding the duties the `of the Commission as they relate to master plan and to the CIP, it it were contended that the powers of the Commission do not lu the conten ~ f make ity recOm om to app;mendd Ove the utilit utility report. The f;harter athoizes igcudthe n the ardIs tiOno concerning the commission public utilities" "location and extent of for the master „ plan, and requires he Commission to approve the location and extant" of all public authoriz including public utility projects authorization or construction of those projects, , prior to We conclude therefore, that since the Charter requires ' Commission approve that the tho "location and extent": of all public utility pro,jetcts contained in the utility auth- orization or construction of those proje s, any revitsions of the approved 'utility CIP which affects the CIP Prior o of any tutili+ty projects previously ap location or extent" must also bra submitted to the Cmmissiondfor its review land approval. Although it would be correct, as a matter of say that the Charter does not: specifically procedure, prohibit the Council iron approving revisions to the utility CTP without first` 1 submitting the revisions that would affect the "locatio extent" of public utilit n and recommendation and approval, j~~sinceo the C Charteron requires Commission ~ippproval of those revisions 'prior`to authorization or construer,iOno we fail to see any benefit by following such 'a procedure, In any case, the revised utilit required to approved by the Commission y projects are or construct:ion. prior to authorization SLIM ARY The City Charter requires the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve thro location and extent of all public utilities prior to authorization or construction of those utilities, Any revisions of the approved utility Capital Improvements Plan, which would affect the location and extent of projects pl°eviously approved by the Commision in pzhei ClpC must also be submitted to the Commission for ttsa approval prior t authorirat:l.on or construction of those projects, Whether those r j; 4 OPINION NO. 88-03 MARCH 180 1988 PAGE FIVE revisions are to be approved by the'Commisvion prior to or after approval by the Council, is an administrative determination. JT D. MORRIS JDM,. Jw xc1 Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager /Robert E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities Frank Robbins, Executive' Director of Planning and Community Development APPROVED DEB . 0 27711 F; TASK MASTER RESPONSIBILITIES A. Speaker's Bureau 't'ask Master Jack Miller Assistant Task Master - Lisa Patterson Staff Liaison , Betty McKoan 1. Recruit lay speakers 2, Contact all clubs and get on programs 3. Inform lay speakers of obligations 4. Coordinate with Assistant City Manager Betty McKean , B, Fund Raising 'Cask Master - Keith Appleton r Staff Liaison - Lloyd Harrell L Work With Campaign Chairman to finalize a budget 2. Raise the required funds C. Special Interost Group Representatives j ; 1. Meet with group and inform about the issue 2. Hncourage to vote for all issues _ ' 3. Insure group leaders contact members 4. Insure group organizes a "get»outi vote" effort 5. Prepare post cards promoting the election 6. Special groups a. Athletic Groups Task Master Mike Campbell Staff Liaison - Steve Brinkman b. Senior Citizens, Retirement C'entvrs, High Steppers Task Master - Hazel Frederick Staff Liaison - Steve Brinkman ` C. Humane society Task Muster - Roberta I)onsbach Staff Liaison - Bill Angelo d. Friends of Library Task Master - Georgia caraway , Staff Liaison » Joella Orr e. Drainage lioraoowners Task. Master » Don Smith f. Domino Club Task Master - Les Holiand Staff Liaison - Stove Brinkman g. Ministers 't'ask Master - Bill Croucli h, Benefit Longue Task Master - Donna Trammell t` rt Task Master Responsibilities page 2 D, Media kepresentntive Task Master - hill Claiborne Staff Liafson - Rick 5vohla 1. brief media about the issue (Channel 25, Denton Record Chzonicl~-) University Papers) 2, Coordlna os'coverage and appropriate presentations 3. Recruit individuals to write "letters to odItor" in support of the issue. h, Public Relations Director Task Master - Joe Holland Staff Liaison - Detty`McKoan 1. Devolop a campai n slogan and committee name obtain approval from steering committee 3. Develop campaign material as re4uired h, Letters from Council Members Task Master - uob Gorton Staff Liaison - Lloyd liarroll 1. Obtain personal letters and markod lists from Council 2, Arrange for private typing 0f all letters 3. Arrange for mailing of all letters by 12.8-86. G, (Open House Task Master Tom Harpool Staff Liaison » !tick Svehla 1, coordinate with City staff regarding arrangements. 2. Arrange publicity for event 3. Arrange for refreshments, etc. 3160M/111089 I 7e 1 i TENTA'T'IVE CALMAR OF EVENTS f C1P 0014D ELECTION 12-13.86 Res>onsible Responsible Pro act Person Grou Matt Date 11/7 o Finalize election tasks, approve Steering Committee calendar, develop list of potential task mr,:iers, and approve tact sheet r l'1/i1 o Finalize fact street and reproduce David iillison kick Sbehla Lloyd Harrell o Finalize list of task masters Hugh Ayer 11/12 o Letter from Hugh Ayer to all CIP Hugh Ayer Lloyd ilarrell committee Members ; t o Meet with all task masters, outline Hugh Ayer Lloyd ilurrell' campaign, and review calendar Betty McKean 0 Schedule orientation for staff liaisons Staff y 11/13 o Develop campaign slogan and committee Steering Committee Betty McKean name and Public Relations 'Task Master P}nalize slide show and script City Staff Betty McKean 11/14 0 List of voters to C}ty Council Staff Lloyd Harrell { 11/14.18 0 'c'ask masters recruit helpers '.Cask Master o begin scheduling presentations to Civic Speaker's Bureau Betty McKean clubs 11/17 o Training soss}on for speakers Speaker's Bureau Lloyd Harrell and City Staff Betty McKean o Hold press cottlerenco - announce slogan, Hugh Ayer committee n,anie and various task masters available for presentations Hugh Ayer and fund- Lloyd Harrell 0 Finalize campaign budget }wising Task Master I i j f S Tentative Calendar of Events UP Bond Election 12-13°86 Page 2 4 Responsible Responsible ]late Project erson roue to - 11/17-12/1 o Task masters hold sessions with special 'task Masters interest groups 11/18 o Letter from Mayor to all City Board Members Ray Stephens Lloyd Harrell 11121 o Steering Committee Session - 7:00 a.m. Hugh Ayer Lloyd Harrell y o Meet with all media about press coverage Media Task Master Betty McKean 11/23 0 Open house at facilities Open House Task Rick Svehl"e s Master and Staff 11/24 0 Personal letter and marked list due from Council Letter Council 't'ask Master Lloyd Harrell 11/24.12/7 o Letters typed for Council Council Letter Lloyd Harrell Task 'Master 11/25 0 Recruit individuals to writo lottery to -Media 't'ask Master Rick Svehla editor 12/1 o Steering Committee Session - 7:UU a.m. Hugh Ayer Lloyd Harrell 12/5 o Steering Committee Session - 7;00 a.m. Hugh Ayer Lloyd Harrell 12/7 o Open Houses at facilities Opon House Task R ck Svehla Master and Staff o Letters signed by Council Council Letter Lloyd Harrell Task Master 12/8 o Mail letters from Council Council Letter Lloyd Harrell Task Master 12/13/86 0 ELECTION .3159tit/111U86 REPORT FROM THF. STREkg' C1Y SUHCOtt[(1T'1'FB { The street 1986; subcommittee finished The main issues that confronted meetings tin a follwsi g on October Z, committee were as 1• Should some substitutions b the $900000 worth of sur lue made because of 380 and because of t P $ funding for U oversizing? he deletion of the 10 Should the Bell Avenue reroutiltg be ed this bond proposal? included in 3• Should all of the projects be included in one Proposition on the ballot? Substitutions were i esa funding that was available because of tile edelfor etlanhop t h e e o of the overfunding of U,S, 380, verslzing and because because the council indicated in'the budget that increase the amount The oversizing was d of developer he elated were larger than reside,ltial, Participation in streets Y wanted to staff to rewrite The Council has ins tructed the This regulation will tle oversizin8 partici versus quire a maximum Pation regulationst developer These rsus the exstiag 34' of of 45 of paving new regulations - Pavin from a' oversizin will virtuall g from a developer, would required the for ny facilities y bunk min byatedevelop dovea lope to ild ers, it without any participationrtrorubuthe up to four lane facilities that was recommended by YJ,anni a City. Thus the 1988.1989 was deleted, g and Zonin $ J.50,000 6 for the fiscal year The subcommittee funding for the U,5war Was also able to take advanta'e 380 tt:e L'ity of Denton. In th~oint Project between t of excess of Denton voted a total Gfaat bond Issue, in 1981 State and right-of=way acquisition to $900,000 for im ro , cizitens Highway Department Indicated P vements and U, S, 380, In that 19811984. Therefore funding U. S, 380 would 'bar b° State drew nearer to 1984-1.98was set aside for that egAs we the design of U.S, 380 hadtbeni8 a ad project, As at do U,8, 380 before .1986 or e987, y h©pn that indicated that Y and , they would not it back to 1989 and 1990. S'ubaequently, Choy have sat conveyed this information to When staff was Informed of this, we Planning and tl,e City L'ouncil, Rather g and Zoning Commission ur invested funds Chan let that money sit id1Y'to omove some other ' it was suggested that Planning and zoning pro,jeets up from later were not .funded, Planning and Zonin years in the ClP that suggested that a number of r g dil this in 1984 and P J ects which would Improve traffic Street Subcommittee Report October 6, 1986 Page 2 movemeuts throughout the City be the main focus of $9001000. They that .further ;agreed that in the next bond issue, they would again reallocate money for U.S, 380, reviewed that recommendation and a Tile Council staff was hang PProved It. This year w in dis:_ u hide g uasioas finanolal advisors about using excess ClPefundsaforoadditional ! projects, the discussion moved to U.S. 380 and that plan to move funds, luring the discussion, the financial 'advisors asked us how the proposition had been 'phrased on the election proposal. We found that this particular $9U4,000 had been specifically called out for U. 61, 380, After further consultation with them, they advised us that since the wording in that particular proposal explicitly set out $900,000 for U.S. 380 it could legally be spent only for U.5. 380. Staff immediately informed the Council. We set aside $900,U0U for U,S, 380 and it is Bitting in out separate CIP interest bearing I accounts, All of these discussions occurred after Planning and Zoning had made the new recommendatiou to the Cnuncil that included 'total funding for the U,3, 380 project an indicated by the Highway Uepa.:tment, (As you wl tl note, the Highway L'epartmant Ia estimate hau nhaudeo from a tons truet.ton cost of $700,(100 to a couseruc'lou'cost of. $1,5 mi.ilion) Since Planning and Zoning had recommended full fv-iding and since the financial advisors and boas at.;orne,ys had ladicated that the original $900,000 could not he `spent, ws in essence either had aIlatiug or recommended fuuding for a total of $2,4 million for U.S.380, Since the indication from the Highway Department %s that the total construction coat would be $1,5 million, we then have the eycess of $900,UOU. It is this money that was in the recommendation that the subcommittee chose to substitute 'or and those substitutions are included in the first year oi the subcommittee recommendation. The second major` point that the subcommittee considered was whether the rerouting of bell Avenue should be included in this bond issue. The subcommittee received numerous calls, letters and comments from a number of people about the project. The overwhelming majority of these contacts were negative. Most of the people thought that this bell Avenue project ahould not be ` built and further more that the existing bell should not be cloned. The subcommittee also considered the past !tell projects and alignments that had negative effects on prior bond issues, Taking these factors into consideration, the subcommittee felt that this issue should be d.ietad from this bond election. 1 Street Subcommittee Report October 6, 198b Page 3 The last major issue that the subcommittee reviewed was whether all of the rest of these recommendations should be considered as one proposal. on the bond issue or as separate or packaged proposals. The subcommittee decided that all of these street improvements should be considered as one total package. The following 1s a list by year of the recommendations of the street and traffic subcommittee. 1y86•1y87 C.ost In Mils 1. Sidewalk on Hercules (Stuart to Buckingham) $ 015 This was a small project which was included in the original Planning and Zoning recommendations. It was in response to neighborhood requests to help school children in the Ginnings ar.a get to school on sidewalks rather than in the street. 2. Lillian Miller Parkway widening This is the second pals of lanes for Lillian Millar 4ia would allow us - to improve the facility to a four lane divided structure with left turns at major street intersections. The first two lanes and all of the drainage improvements were built under an assessment program to the developers in this area These last two lanes would be at the City's total expense. 3, Evers Perk sidewalk (Windsor to Evers school) 3.040 This is a substitute project for the overfundiag of U.S. 380, The sidewalk runs along the north side of Windsor from Locust Street to Pavers Parkway and on the north side of 13vers Park from Locust to the school, This is an attempt again to provide some safe walking areas for students that are attending Evers School, 4. Turn lanes (Dallas Dr. and Teaslsy Carroll and Eagle, $.230 135 and Lillian Miller] i This project would build turn lanes to help improve traffic movements at the three intersections mentioned, At Dallas Drive and Teasley lane, these would be left turn lanes on Dallas Drive, At Carton and Eagle) it would be a free -night turn for south Carroll 'onto westbound Eagle, At 135 and Lillian Miller, there would be three free right turn lanes for northeast bound Lillian Miller turning onto the southbound frontage road, for southwest bound Loop 288 turning right onto the uallao Drive or business 77 frontage road or northbound 135 frontage Load, and for the northbound frontage road turning northeast on to Loop 288. This project is also a substitu overt to undin project f g on U. S, 38U, or the. w 011 street subcommittee Report October 6, 1986 knge 4 5. New "4041 installations (Mulberry and Carroll, Old North Road and Ph $,245 I O,S, 380, Windsor and Sharman) These installations would be at the They would allow us intersecti new mentioned, c to install This ontrollers and signal equipment. poles and state -of -the -art project. i s also onas substitute 64 Upgrade of Carroll and University signal systems (Controller, replacements att x,170 Carroll and Hickory, Carroll and Parkway, Carroll and Congress, University and Alice, Carroll and University, Hell and University, Locust and University, Elm and University, Carroll and Oak) As nuted, this would replace all of the controllers` at the above mentioned intersections, It would allow us them with state-of-the-art controllers that to replace linked to a central computer that is would be able to suggested to be funded in n fiscal 1987.1,988, This is also a substitute Project. T, hi a Signal at Loop 288 and U.S. 380 Project has been moved up. It was $+064 recommendatioa that was requested by Planning and part Zo khe staff would allow us to build a diamond interchange tofacilitatelthe new construction at the overpass at Loop 288 and li 380, 8. Traffic study This was a staff recommendation for the Plannin x'025 request, The study will. allow us to do an a view ppr g and re vi ew of all the new installations on Carroll and Unoipveia rrstierety, It will suggest timing schedules for different peri day. It will make suggestions on how the whole ode during the run and how it should be tied to the central computer. Ith:a was a substitute system should project from the excess funding levels on U,g 380 and it was also part of the recommendation that staff made to Planning and Zoning at their request. 1587 -198ti ' 1• Improve Woodrow Lane Coa~ 1 _1_ M ] lone (MOKinneY to Spencer Road) $.525 This pro,jeat would build a four lane di, MoKinney Street to Spencer sided facility >rom Spencer-Colorado connec ion thatd leand i.0 It to t existing ads tto the mall,he It would be built in conjunction with the Woodrow Lane bridge which is recommmended to be built uboittee, aome ed It in 1986-1987 by the drainage Plnnning and Zonin was 8s original recommendation from the B Commission. Yi t y Street Subcommittee Report October 6, 1986 Page S 'l. Teasley Lane (Dallas Drive to 135) s $.?00 This funding was a recommended in recommendation from staff. It was additional response to Planning and 7.oning's request for proposals. Teasley was originally funded in the $1U million bond issue. In that issue we estimated or our project to match Highway funding and to inc ude t hed section of Teasley which was not included in the on nal this proposal, Since it is a Farm-to•Market glaesta final authority over design road, the State has estimated the cost of and review, We originally required to build it t under his to be $170,QOU, because we will be traffic, some concrete structures that, have been l built over the years and q Y lines, and also ac q additional right-of-way at the intersections, our new estimate ia'some we are requesting an additional $37 0,000. Tharefore, requirements, $200000 to meet these 3, Traff`icr Signals (Replacement of one controller) ,025 This was an original recommendation by Planning and Zonings it would allow us to replace our must mechanically deficient couteoller in the system when we get to this year, 4. 'traffic Study Phase 11 (computer and tie-in to system on Carroll $,075 and University) ' This will be the actual University and Carroll s computer and the tie-in to the the Planning and Zoning re ystem, quest for sadditionaltaff response to tie-in computer will projects. ffia instanGaneoual allow us to analyze Instant; it y throughout the systems on Universityaaan will allow us to make each of these systems respond to pre-planned timing sequences or it will allow us to change signal operations indi.viduall as will also give us a dail Y the need Sri eS. It signal and help us to daily history of the operation of each tion to the police and legal departmentsdonaanyo claims 1 dgedg against the City for liability dealing with the aignals. 5. Traffic and drainage improvements to Mingo Road $.250 This project is a Substitute for Ghe Bell Avenue deletlor.. It will allow us to make Some basic improvements to Min between kuddell and Hell Avenue, We will spend ad this mogoney Ro to make drainage replacements at Mingo and the Channel crossing at the TWU golf course. Also drainage improvements to the Intersection of kuddell and Mingo, ll: will. also a1J,ow us to stake road wideuings to accommodate left turn lanea at Ruddell and possibly at the intersections. a Any motley that Is t Service Center and Frame Street look at signali2ing the intersection loftltuddell and Mingo, us to will also allow Street Subcommittee Report October 6, 1986 Page 6 6. Rebuilding of Hell Avenue (from Mingo to U,S, 380) 3.450 This is also a substitute project for the deletion of the Bell Avenue improvemente• This would allow us t existing Bell Avenue from University to Mingo Rogdrebuald the also us to rep).aco some curbs along this entire length t where they need to be rebuilt, We will also look at minor improvements to the intersection of Hell and Mingo and possibly U,S, 380 at Bell Avenue, 148 9I Cost la Millions 1. Avenue E Improvements (Eagle Dr, to 135) $.U40 This would project a two lane facility from the frontage road west of Avenue D and 135 to the intersection of Eagle and Avenue E. It would provide easier access to North TPxas State from any place on the west side of the campus directly from t5. This was an original recommendation of planning and Zoning, 2. Davis Street paving $.050 This is for a two block area of Davis Street, This project would run from Ruddell to Jannie Str'eet,' It is a residential street and an original recommendation from planning and Zoning, It will provide a regular residential section and curb and gutter. 3. Fs42181 - Teasley nano $,250 (from 135 to Ryan Road) This additional funding is needed because of cost increases as indicated by the Highway Department. It will be to make Teasley Lane four lanes from 135 'co Ryan Road, This is the original Highway project and the funding ratio is approximately 4 to 1, that being the State's 4 to the City's 1 dollar. 1989 i 9 o Gosh in -Millions 1. Loop 288 (from U. S, 380 to Colorado Blvd,) $2. 2U ~ This would make a four lane structure on Loop 288 from U.S. 380 to Colorado Blvd, It would provide for intersection improvements at major: intersections such as iicXianey. This will be a state participation project. The coat benefit ratio is approximately 7 to 1, 2• U.S. 380 - University $.600 (from Locust to Loop 288) This would provide a six lane facility from Locust Street to Loop 288 with intersection improvements at major intersections, This is the, project that we oliminated $900,000 from since it was double funded after we receivrnd the information from the financial advisors and the bond attorneys, Street Subcommittee Report October 6, 198b Page 7 3. U.S. 38o right-of•way acquisition, 'This will fund the right-of-way acquisition for $the0 above I Project- It will provide us with money to match the state for any right-of-way acquisition, The funding ratio will be $10 of state money for every $1 of ours. 4, gxt6tsion of Nottingham (from U.S. 380 to Mingo Road) $•500 This project will provide for four lane improvement from UPS. 38U to Mingo Road, It will provide intersection improvements at Nottingham and University and at Mingo and Nottinghfim, $50,UOO worth of 'funding for right-of-way is included In,th.ts project and also $50,000 for signal improvements at Nottingham and U.S. 380. The committee further made a recommendation that only $50,DU0 be spent on right-of-way and that if further right-of-way is needed then assessments should be made to property owners on both sides to cover the additional costs, This project is also a substitution for the Bell Avenue deletion. 1990-1991 Coat iq tfillious 1. Reconstruction of Oriole Streot $.117 This project has been rescheduled, it was an original recommendation from kianning;and Zoning, It is rescheduled because the Loma del Rey drainage project will be done in connection with the Loop 288 construction and part of the main trunk line for system rune on Oriole Street, It will provide a residential street and new curb and gutter where needed, 2. Fort Worth Drive $1.065 (from 135 to FM 1830) This is another state project, It will provide for a four lane facility with intersection improvements at major crossings, lc is a state matched project, The approximate match is 4 to l in favor of the City. In conclusion, the total cost of these projects is $7,736 million, The committee originally had some nine and a quarter million dollars worth of funding available to its ThZy voted turn approximately $l.3 million back to the chairman and the rest of the group to help fund other subcommittee overruns or other projects the whole committee fait war needed. "hey did, however, make one other suggestion that shuuld be reviewed by the full committee, They suggested that as a number one { priority for additional. funding if funds are available, Ruddell Street, This would provide $300,000 for improvements to allow for a small amount of widening on kuddoll, The widening would provide for a median and some true left turn bays from University Drive to Mingo !toad, It would be contingent on acquiring the right-of-way from TWU. i a Street Subcommittee Report October 81 1986 Page 8 This concludes Subcommittee, the final report of the Street and Traffic ~ We would be happy to discuss any her questions the committee chairman or the committee as a whole may have at the October 8 and October 13 meetings, c leer it ` n1 Hill Crouc 311UH di { f i } WrYof DENrON, rEXAS mumciPAL SUILDINO / DENTON, TEXAS 7020t / TELEPHONE (9t 7) 5d6-a307 Office ct the 01V Aimnager M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager DATE: July 221 1986 SUBJECT: CI^ Projects and Scheduling of the Projects Since the original suggestions for projects and timing was made to Planning and Zoning, a number of events have taken place. These events have caused us to reconsider several Items in terms ,f need or implementation. We would suggest that the following `information be given to the members of the Special Citizens Advisory Committee for Capital Improvements on the following projects. Recently because of some legal requirements we have been advised that we could_ not reschedule some of the originalU.S. 380 money. That moans for this year's existing CIP Program there is not enough money to complete all of the st nal renovations, It also means that we will not need the 11.5 million to make the final' improvements to U.S. 380 in year 1988-1989, since we cannot use existing funds, they will have to be used for the U,5, 380 project. We will only need an additional $600,000 in 1988-1989 for U.S, 380, However, we will need $170,000 to upgrade the Carroll Blvd, signal, system, $145,000 for signals at Teasley and Londonderry, i;arroll`and Mulberry, and Windsor and Sherman, and $230,000 for turn lanes' and Carroll, and Bogle, Teasley and Dallas Drive, and I35 and Loop 288 intersections. This equals a need of $545,000. In order to keep the signal pproggram moving ahead we would suggest that this be funded in 198b-1987, Also iii 1986-1987 we can eliminate the east McKinney culvort at a cost of $25,000, This elimination is brought about by some developments on east McKinney, The developers were required to build this structure instead of the City since they chose to develop now, CIP Memo July .22, 1986 Page 2 In 1987-1988 we could eliminate the Seline drainage system. This project was originally scheduled at $320,000. We were able to do this project now because of a favorable bid that we got on the rebuilding of Stuart Road, some development activity, In the area and some additional existing C,IP;money that was not earmarked for any 'special project. In 1987-1988 we will need an l additional $50,000 to extend the drainage line on Stuart from J its existing terminus across the right-of-away of the proposed i Loop 288. We would also suggest a new drainage project on Pecan Creek. This would be channel improvements sear the Phoenix Apartments. The cost is estimated at $140,000. A second new project would be funding of fireequipment for the new station, A nev engine woulc cost $200,000. Also in that year there is a need for a proposc,d signal at U.S. 380 and Loop 288. The amount for this signal improvement is $64,000. We have been advised by the Highway Department that these signal impprovements must be made with the first section of Loop 288. This would necessitate moving this project up to 1986-19870 Finally in fiscal year 1988-1889, we have $4500000 slated for an update to the drainage study. We would suggest that `$25,060 of this money be spent earlier for "Phase I" which will upgrade our drainage manual and revise our design critai-ia, We would recommend doing this in fiscal year 1986-1987. Also in fiscal year 1988-1989 there is an existing recommendation for $150 000 for oversize stroet paving, The Council is currently considering an ordinanco that would eliminate most of the funding of oversizin by the City. If this ordinance passes we estimate that that $1500000 would not be needed. If this is the case, we would suggest that other alternatives for the $1500000 be considered. In particular we would suggest the money be earmarked for replacement of signal controllers within the City. it is my understanding that there has also been some discussion about considering using the $3.6 million for three recreation centers rather than the two. If that is done, it appears that some reshuffling in the first year in the amount equivalent to about $600,000 could be done. In conclusion, if all of these recommendations and suggestions were accepted by the Committee, you would have the following impact an each fiscal year: 1996 - We would need an additional $545,000 for signal and traffic improvements. $64 000 for the signal at U.S, 380 and Loop 288 and $29,000 for the Phase I of the drainage study. The total for the additional projects is $634 000, This could be off-set by a change in the recreation center strategy which would eliminate the need for $600,000 in the first year, We also suggest eliminating the $25,000 culvert on east McKinney. CIP Memo July 22, 1986 Page 3 1987 - We would drainage system and eliminate $3'10,oo0 for 380 and Loop 288 that was For the signal Selin(~e recommend adding was moved forward, at t1, s' would the Stuart drainage sy •$SU,000 of that to ae extend that the Council considex adWe Would also recommend We experienced a great deal of flotwo gne ects, Year along Pecan Creak in F proj Apartments, We estimat e that area OL In the`last would cost a t drainage me the Phoenix on the fiscal proximate, year y $140,000. Improvements The total effect elimination of $384%000 1887-1988 would additional worth of es, the Seline and $50000 o00 worth of drain xpenditure age improvements at Pecan The net effect would bon e a peccan Creekofould be added, 1988 - We would recommend decreasing the 1f '000, there by $150,009 in fiscal However, we would su the Oversize need for replacin ggest that that category, real fiscal impact tonf the controllersm oey be used be total reduction of needs to :1988-1989e only drainage plan would be 525,000 if Phase I ofw~the moved up to fiscal 1986-198t 1989.1990 - We re In funding for would 'j-8- 380, mmend a $900.,000 information that did This was due to the legal existing funds now, not allow the City to recommendation Of We have Spend the Original recommended char if and Zoning as g es for your review. tine You well as If or the Committee questions, the or staff and I the council has any additional i would be happy to tr any further nformation that you may need, y and provide Ric ava Assistant City Manager ji 3008M PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1986-1987 Neighborhood Center, Southeast Denton Mil-- J~ \ "a Del Rey Drainage $1.800 i Lillian Miller Parkway Widening .825 ,ridge on Woodrow Lane 450 Reconstruct Ortol,e street .250 east Mcx in n' ey Street culvert. .117 s Sidewalk on Hercules 1025 40 115 $3.482 198~gg8 Sell Avenue Relocation (Ei 0n-a i Senior Center Addition ret half) $1.000 Improve Woodrow Lane .750 Willow Springs Drainage .525 Stuart Road/selene brain,,, .337 Plans forcity Hall Expansion .320 Athletic Field 200 Animal Control Center Expansion .200 Signals Loop 288 and US 380 .150 Traffic Signals 064 i .025 $3,'S 7a ' 024le i Planning and zon9 Commission Recommended Capital Improvement Man Page Two 1988-1989 I City Hall Expansion. Mf 2lfons Fire Station $1.200 Drainage Study •500 Stuart/Sunnydale Drainage •450 Taylor Park Drainage 4350 FM 2182 (Teasley Lane): Four-Lane divided from 6300 IR-35E South to Ryan Road .250 Fire Vehicles Athletic Fields `200 Oversize Paving .200 Burning Tree Bridge - .250 8urning Tree Drainage 4150 Avenue E Improvements (Eagle Drive to 18_35 .064 Service Road} ,040 Davis Street paving $3.769 1989-1990 Millions 1 Loop 288/Local Participation: Four-Lane divided II from us 380 South to near 18.356 $2.200 US 380/Local partlcipatlon: Six-Lane divided from U5 77 (Locust) to Loop 288 11500 City Hall Expansion E Drainage improvements in Holly Hill area 1.200 US 380 Right-of-Way Acquisition .300 r .250 Athletic Fields Audra Lane Drainagge 200 i ..090 0241e $5.640 i 'r t. Planning and 2onl Commission Recommended Capital Improvement Plan Page 'three 1990-1991 Millions ► Recreation Center $1.800 ,r Bell Avenue Relocation (second half) 1,500 Fort Worth Drive (Us 377); Four-Lane divided ~ 1,065 from TH-35E to FM 1830 Athletic Fields Library improvements 6600 X 'traffic study and rmplementation 250 .100 $5,315 I i 02419 SUGGESTED REVISIONS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COWIISSION'S RE OMh1BNDED CAPITAL rMpROVgMENT PLAN 198` 6-1987 MI II 1 ions Neighborhood Center, Southeast Denton Loma Del Rey Drainage $1.800 Lillian Miller Parkway Widening x825 Bridge on Woodrow Lane .450 i Reconstruct Oriole Street 1250 East McKinney Street Culvert •117 Sidewalk on Hercules (gliminate) ,025 015 $3.482 Suggested Implementation Changes Carroll Upgrade New Signals 170,000 Turn Lanes 1450000 Signal - Loop 288 and U,S, 3g0 2301000 Phase 1 Drainage Study 64,000 25,000 Total Additions Deletions 6340000 Total Effoct 25,UUU ' 609,000 9 Recgomested mendedeCapital to Planning and Zoning Commissions 19888 Bell Avenue Relocation (First millions Senior Center Addition half) - Improve Woodrow Lane $1 000 .750 Willow Springs Drainage .525 Stuart Road/Selene Drainage Plans for City Hall l3xpanssicr, (Ellminate $270,OOU) '337 Athletic Field ,320 Animal $200 Control Center Expansion .200 Signals Loop 288 and US 380 Signals Traffic Sig (Moved to 86.87) .150 .06q $3.571 Fire Equipment Su ested Tm lamentation Chan as pecan Creek Drainage 2000000 000 Total 140 Additions Total Deletions Total Effect 340,000 334oo 6#000 RecommendedeCapital t Plannin page 3 provemong planzoning Commission's 198` 9 City Hall Expansion Mill s lire Station r-! Drainage Stud $1.100 Stuart/S,unnydale(Delete $25,000 _ Moved to 86- .Soo Ta 2or p rainage 87) .450 y ark Drainage PM 2181 (Teasle X350 IH~35E So y Lune): Nour,Lane divided from •300 uth to Ryan Road lire vehicles .250 Athlettc Fields Oversize Pavin.200 Burning Tree Br8i (Possibly delete by ord, change) •200 dge Burning Tree Drainage •150 Avenue B Improvements •1S0 Service Road) (Eagle Drive to IH.35 0064 Davis Street Pavin, •040 - 015 $3. 769 Update Signal Su ested Im lamentation Chan Controllers e9 Total Additions 15-y~ Total Possible Deletions 1so,uoo 17 5, 000 Suggested Revisions Recommended Capital t to o Planning Plan Imp 8 Page q Commission's 198.- -:g.1gr90 1 Loop 288/Local Participation: Millionsi from us 380 south to Four-Lane divided near IH-355 $2.200 US 380/Local 'Participation; from US 77 (Locust) Six-Lane divided to Loop 488 (Delete $900,000) 1.500 City Hall Expansion Drainage Improvements in Holly Hill area 1.100 US 380 Right-of-Way Acquisition 6300 Athletic Fields .250 Audra Lane Drainage .200 -40,90 Total Delption $5.690 WtooU 1990-199, Mt ong Recreation Center Hsll Avenue Relocation (Second half) Fort Worth Drive $1 800 (US 377)r Four•Lane divided 1,500 from IN-35h to Fhj 1830 1.065 Athletic Fields Library Improvements X600 Traffic Study and Implementation 0250 _..100 $5315 30101 CfTY of D1SNT4N gBgQW¢~~ MEMORANDUM DATE; March 24, 1986 T0; David Ellison, Senior Planner ~ FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer SU8JE=t PROJECTS CONSIDERED FOR 1990-91 CIP The Public Works Department has compiled a that need Commissiont,o A1be1conss tiedered by the Plannitt list of g and zoningajects he this proyeote need immediate attenti~tt, but leaserpl~ae seems inothe pianning i available Capital Improvements Program public hearin funding, Please and zoning packet for the g 1, oia _UA Dra_..irta~. - $500,000 The Subdivision was built with no drains e i some severe flooding m g ro occur p vementS, S In large storms, 2' L 1i~tl. f:. er k .p$y,i~q $460,o00 Tt4tfLo has atreadV made the level of service drop drastically, The signal. at Loop 288 and I-36 is a major reason, but the road is already reaching capaoitY, This Would fund completion of the road from 135 to Teasley as a four-lane, divided thoroughfare, 3, KID-'100t i~lg_#'_ay-filq - $460,000 Windsor needs to be upgraded to a four lane, divided thoroughfare to handle the increased traffic expa'rieneed since the connection from Loouot to Hinkle has boen made, A lot of development (zonin tion) has been occurring which g' Platting Wil construe- 'norease the traffic in this area lb a y Y 1 19990.-1991, David Ellison March 24, 1986 Page 2 4, C~muletion of Loncridge Drainage ~itidae~ _ $325,000 The first half of this system Was approved by. Planning and Zoning last year, This $325,000 mill allow the entire system to be built, _ 5.~tr_ 9lQna1 1mCr0~men s $50,000 minimum with $100,000 needed Denton's growth has put a very heavy load on the traffic Control s etem, if this item is not continuously budgeted into the GIP, out streets will teach an unacceptable level of service. i For next years consideration; 6. Participation in Loop 288 reconstruction from two-lane to six-lane, divided urban section. City participation for outside curb and gutter with longitudinal drainage will be at least 1,1 million dollars, which will essentially require the entire cip budget. CCL_ Jerry .1ar~ at 1496a 1 _ 11MON W. rR[ES1, P.E.' ~~11 f1 ....n /,Q JAMES R. NICHOLS, P. t. 0060T L ~1t..i.L.l~1..L: ~l~11Y n log LLERS.CR[SSINPE S, P.i,. ✓ ROEERT S. OOOCH, P.R. FREESE AND N ICH0il51 INC. JOE PAULJONE1. P.R. ROSIRT A. THOMPSON III, P.Y. C O N S V l 7 1 N G E N G I N E E R 5 JOHN N. HOAUN. P.1, V. ANTHONY Rl101 Pt. OARV /L RIYVRS, P.Y. JOE S. MAPES, P.E. 1 W. ERNEST C1.90,1I144 P. E, EL41N C• COPELANO, P.E. June 1986 A, LEE HCAO IN III. . O,PE, A. LEY Pt. RONNIE M. I.tMONS, P.E. MICHACLO, IIORRISON, P.E. C. OIANE PALMEN. P.L. RORERT P, PENCE, Pd. LYO A, OOTSON, P.t, OAVIOR. OATTlE JOHN L. JONts, P.4 Mr, Jerry Clark, P.E, City Engineer City of Denton 215 E, McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 Re: Schedule of Work for Updating the Master Drainage Plan Dear Mr, Clark: In response to your request during our meeting on May 270 1986, and our telephone conversation of May 30, 1986, we hove prepared a generalized schedule of work for the proposed project. This schedula is based on beginning work in October of 1988 as you suggested and assumes that the work is done progressively by a team of two engineers and two technicians which vmuld result in a work effort of approximately two years in duration. This schedule does not allow for major time lapses between phases which could lengthen the time frame. If desirable the time frame could be shortened by approximately six months by placing another engineer and technician on the project, Very truly yours, FREESE ANDNINICHOLS, INCI I Robert L. Nichols,-P,E, Executive Vice President RLN/CDP:jk xc: Rick Svehla Jerry Fleming Hill Mann Gary Reeves 911 L A M A R 91 RktT FORT WORTH. I R X A 8 79109 T C L 9 PH 0 NE a 1 7 a9•T 1 91 MEIr R0 01 7 4 99. 1 ADO f r SCHLOULE OF YORK iOp uPOAtC~NASiCIFARXIHAf PLAN 1988 19 &T--Aav W6 n e r r 1990 P Y n o ug P r &c n e r Dr y PHASt I: ROM DRAINAGE CNITMA ar RAUlew 1916 Manual xx b. Neel with StafUOauncll xx c, Public HeerlP9s xx xx PHASE Ili REYISt DRAINAGE MANUAL Ax xx PHASE TTI] UPDATE ORAINADE PLAN a-t,, place Base Naps an CAD xx xx xx xx xx xx ` t•M, Prepare Drainage DeSlgn xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xR xx xx xx xx xx xx PHASL M EVALUATE DETENTION PONDS xx xA xx xx i i 1 tIMON W. FRCEtt, PA' JAMtt R. H(ONOLE, P-f. ROORRY L. 14108OL9, F.E. LEt t. PREEEt, 0 C. ROttRT b. 0000. P EH'IiEY,tiB ~1~lh NiGNQ1)8 1NC, JOtROtPPRY A, fN%%PIHOMPI, OW A. ON Ill, P.E. JOHN H. COON, PC ( O N S U L T N G E N G N E E a S / AN HONY RCIONP6e OARY H. RCEVE1. P.O. Jot t. MAPEt, PX W. LRHEtT otfMtNT. P.C- RECEIVED JUN ~ ELVIN C. COPEIANO,P. t. 1K,C +n(~C AJ9RAY . Ltt L. rLEMINO. P-E. U +JQL} A. Ltt HCAO AO IN. PC ' June 5, 1.986 RONHIt M. LEMONS P.t. MICHAEL O. MORAItON. P.E C. WANt PALMEP, P E. NOEERT P. PENCt. 11 . E. LCO A, OOTEON. P.C. OAVIO R. OATTIt JOHNL JONE91 P.E. Mr, derry Clark, P.E. City Engineer City of f,,nton 216 E, McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 Re: Evaluation of Effort Required to prepare Master Drainage Plan for Upper Hickory Creek Dear Mr, Clark: As per your request on May 30, 1986, we have taken a look at the areas west of Denton along Highway 390 with regard to selecting the first phase of the work effort in preparing the update of the Master Drainage Plan which could possibly be funded from existing budgeted funds, Within the area for which the City 1s obtaining new orthophotographic mapping, thirty two (32) sheets of the the original 100 sheets cover the areas for which you have a pressing interest for development. Since these sheets are in the upper watersheds of the areas in the proposed scope, the drainage plans for these areas could be prepared first without' affecting the work effort on the rr:maining sheets and could be initiated before October of 1988, The work entailed in revising the Drainage Manual would be completed before the drainage plans of Phase 1[I would be initiated, With our present knowledge of the scope of work, we would propose to do the following work effort, A fee and approximate time frame of work for budgeting purposes is also estimated. Also enclosed are the U.S.G.S. maps covering this area which wero used for this estimate, Work Effort Approximate Estimated Time Frame Fee Phase 1: Revise Design Criteria 2 months $ 81000 Phase 11: Revise Drainage Manual 2 months $ 14,000 Phase 111; Drainage Plans (32 Sheets) a, Digitize Base Topo Drawings 2 months $ 41,000 (32 sheets)' 811 LAMA R OT H E I[ T F 0 h T W 0 A r H, T 11 T 8 1 0 Z Fe tl 81 7d 2 g, 1 9 b 0 ?ELEpHbN6 817 3387 181 1 Mr. Jerry Clark, P.E. June 5, 1986 Page 2 b, 'Prepare Drainage Designs 4 months (32 Sheets) 5104000 Phase IV; Research Hickory Creek Hydrology 1 month Total Initial Effort 11 months $t6~,oaD If we can be of further service, please advise us, Very truly yours, rREESE AND NICHOLS, INC, Robert L, Nichols, E. Executive Vice President RLN/CDP:jk Enclosures s PROPOSED PARKS AND RECREATION i DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 1986-1990 1986-87 Zone 4 Recreation Center 1.60 Senior Center Expansion .75 Soccer Complex 1100 Evers Park Renovation .30 Upgrade Existing Parke 35 Total 4.00 1987-88 Zone 2>Recreation Centex 1.80 Zone 2 Swimming Pool 1.00 Enclose Pool 50 Softball Complex 480 Land for Centex X50 'Dotal 4.60 1988-89 Lone 6 Recreation Center 2.00 Zone 6 Pool 1.00 Denia Park Renovation .30 'Dennis Center Renovation .20 North Lakes Center Expansion .50 Total 1!.00 1989-90 Civic Center Renovation ,40 Denia center Renovation 50 Renovate Civic Center Pool .25 Upgrade Existing Parks .65 Land Acquisition/Development 2400 Total 3.80 DOCU0550 ~f - ti o n u s N ti c J r .A N 't ai .c f n F t j a~ ;p C T i u Vi` 1. 41 04 FO h'~ M 1 v ry n ~ g + !a F4 Z b ab W i 10 ' e 20, N b 3 i jj 1, rim ~H! N Jjif14 p Y. 0 1 0 0 q ~~pp ! i b r a~, r gq ` y M T i V, t y y i ME a w _ ~ ~ `eWi .Na N !J i U app] •o b~ { U c4_4 z r r E N N r'-y te, r i ®N a n o `t7 : . ot IN 0 1 LA r 1 ,I kA H { yy ~ V• Y ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXPANSION "I T , JUSTIFICATION FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER DIVISIONAL NEEDS, I, PRIMARY NEEDS A. Existing facility capacity, 4,067 animals per year Number,of animals sheltered, 1995-86 , ,61*12$ animals Resulting in overcrowded conditions which: 1, Creates undesirable living conditions for animals. 2. Increases the potential for the spread of diseases. 3. Reduces holding time available for owned animals, 4. Reduces potential for animal adoptions, 1 5, Reduces productivity and effectiveness of staff. f 1 B, Quarantine Holding Area for only 10 animals. `I Resulting in the farming out of quarantined animals to local veterinarians whichi 1. Substantially increases cost to animal owners, 2. Reduces productivity and effectiveness of staff, C. Compliance with State Standards. Resulting in violation of State regulations whichr 11 Increases potential of legal action against the City. 11, SECONDARY NEEDS A. Heating and ventilation system inadequacies. Resulting in unbearable living conditions for animals during periods of extreme cold and heat whichi 1. Increases potential for death of the animals, 2. Increases potential for,legal, action against the City. 3. Reduces productivity and effectiveness of staff. S. Employes working conditions inadequacies. Resulting in undesirable working environment which= 1. Creates poor employee morale. 2. Reduces productivity and effectiveness of staff. 3, Inoreasee potential for turn-Over. an3 ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXVANS10N COST ESTIMATES New Facility Expansion $193,104 Existing Facility Imfrovementc 91000 Fencing and Awnings. 81000 Architectural and Engineering Fees 15,400 I TOTAL COST $225104 Denton County Funds $ 40,000 City of Denton Funds 185,104 TOTAL COST $225,104 City of benton Funds Required $185,104 Original City Funding Allocation 150,004 DIFFERENCE $ 35,104 an3 CITY OF DENTON ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER PROJECTIONS FOR ANIMALS SHELTERED AND HOLDING SPACE R89UIRUT) CITY OF HOLDING DENTON HOLDING TOTAL DENTON SPACE COUNTY SPACE TOTAL HOLDING SPACE ANIMALS REQUIRED ANIMALS REQUIRED ANIMALS REQUIRED YEAR SHELTERED __K /FT SHELTERED 5 /FT SHELTERED S /FT 1985-1986 4,591 1,996 11529 665 61120 21661 19V,-1987 5,283 21297 1,797 781 7,080 31078 1987-1988 51975 20598 20065 848 8,040 3,496 1988-1989 61667 2,899 2,333 1,014 9,OOo 31913 1989-1990 71359 30199 2,601 10131 9,960 4,330 1990-1991 8,051 31500 2,869 1,297 10,920 41748 1991-1992 8,743 3,801 3,137 1.,364 11,880 5,165 1992-1993 91435 41102 31405 11480 12,840 51583, 1993-1994 10,127 41403 3f673 11597 13,800 6,000 1994-1995 10,519 41704 31941 11713 14,760 6,417 1995-1996 11,511 51005 4,209 1,830 15,720 6e835 1996-1997 12,203 51306 4,477 11946 16,680 71252 1997-1998 12,895 5,607 4,745 11898 17,640 7,670 1998-1999 13,587 5907 51013 21180 18,600 8,087 1999-2400 14,279 61208 5,281 2,296 19,560 81504 i NOM Pro3eations based on 22% growth rate In number of animals sheltered, an3 oven% r S` r ; f v 2 7 r,i p : I ~ 41~ ~ 4' 19 1- f0 1 }i :J =r i, 9 ( A rq Y T 1~ C~Q2) p yrl o z r ) P tM l b' N C f` ti '9 ~ p r L a 'A J T p +0 kI N 4 N 3 ~ 10 ~ M '7 o G~ i J ' r 0 0 • r~ L ~y N A pJ~ r+ p p~ 1. O 0i •7 N ]M § yy4~~ O O O (N~ O OD O O 00 M`r 'ti ~'y I4 q r.~ A q Q 10 10 q n t0 H yr p I r N ~ O J A IJ oai O d N O m 0 w N P 0 b ~``•6~ .~.1 1•y~ wA~ r.O~ K+•~11 rgrr~1A.1 ~.71 by1 y ' N ~1 H ~ ri H H H ;1 ♦1 ri ~ r Fy ~1 ~aaff It fi~rr(L ititittitit r r I L 1 tittittlit I! k ,r 3 r 1 F L. ,:rr , 1 little is l By the year 1990 the population of Denton is expected to have risen to about 78,000 residents. During this projected period of increased population, Denton will be facing a severe strain on city services and facilities if preventive measures are not taken, To aid the city in meeting future needs, Denton City Council members have called for a $21.7 million capital improvements bond election on Saturday, December 13. The entire five year capital improvements program can be approved without any additional increase in taxed._ Denton's participation in the Metroplex's i recent development boom has placed a strain on its street and drainage 'infra structure, In many areas, the travel times across Denton have doubled and tripled. citizens of Denton spend many hours waiting at traffic signals or slowly creeping along clogged traffic arterials during rush hours. When this bond issue is approved, the State i of Texas will provide matching funds on a four to one basis to the City, 1., ~I i Four roads will be expanded starting in 1990. They are Teasley Lane, Fort Worth Drive, University Drive, and Loop 288. The sections to be built are those currently experiencing the moat congestion. The program will also solve critical turning lanes to intersections that experience long traffic delays. Th !je intersections area 135 at Lillian Miller, 135 at hoop 288 Teasley Lane at ballas Drive Eagle Drive at Carroll Boulevard Traffic signals play an important -role by coordinating the times allowed for side street movements across the major roads. Many of Denton's signals are controlled by equipment that is not capable of providing the complex control movements necessary. The program will modernize the signals along Carroll between Eagle Drive and University and along University Drive between Loop 288 and 135, s -2- r y r s Four new signals will be added to solve the congestion and safety problems. Those area Loop 288 at University Old North Road at University Mulberry at Carroll Windsor at Sherman A computer controlled system to coordinate these signals so traffic does not have to stop t at each signal will allow constant monitoring of I the signals, immediate notification of signal malfunctions, and even changes to be made to handle special events or seasonal peak traffic flows. There are city streets that also need expansion, new construction, or to be reconstructed. Lillian Miller parkway, is an essential thoroughfare that must be expanded o` a four lane street. WoOdrOw Lane has become critical as pathway to the Mall. i Mingo Road and 13011 Avenue will be. reconstructed to incorporate necessary draina;e improvements and int ers 0clion modifications. ~3» 4i Nottingham will be extended from University Drive to Mingo Road creating a future north/south thorou hfare r and Davis, Avenue E, and Oriole Streets are smaller projects that a:e also included to tills bond issue. Sidewalks will be added at the Evers schcol and Ginnings School to help provide safer schcvl routes for the children. Two bridges are needed to carry traffic across pecan Creek and Cooper Creek. Both are - low water crossings that reqularly are flooded i and dangerous to the public, The new bridges it would span these creeks safely. All the projects included will correct problems in older parts' of the city. ;e v drainage in these areas currently follows earth swales and paths to roads where the culverts are generally undersized. t The major projects arei s Taylor Park Pecan Creek Willow Springs Malone Longridge/Hollyhill -4- 9 E t To prevent future problems, the bond issue also requests funds to update the current drainage regulations and to expand Denton's Master Drainage Plan. This will greatly help reduce the number of drainage problems Denton will inherit as the city limits expand in the years to come. Within the next 15 years older adults will be the largest popul$t,ion gro"p in our country, To prepare for that growth, we must be ins posit:io n to continue. to expand our programs and. facilities serving this age group. Denton's senior citizen program is ane of ~ the largest programs offered by the sparks and Recreation Department. We cooperate with many other agencies to provide a full range of special servioeL-„ Health screening, transportation, meals, volunteer services, counseling, plan educational and recreational programs are a portion of tho services provided. y5~ f i The Senior Center, located on Bell AVAnuer is currently too small to serve the needs of our senior adults. The facility was constructed as a part of the 1975 bond issue. After a few years of usm, we started experiencing our first real needs tor expansion. 'today our need for space is even greater due to the extensive list of programs and services provided. j The existing facility offers a small multipurpose room which also serves as 'a i gameroom, classroom, and kitchen. The space in I this room cannot accommodate many of our large ; 1 special events and dances. Plans call for a 100000 Square foot expansion which includes the addition of a multipurpose room twice the size of our existing area. I Other areas will includoo,..., 1 a separate gameroom so tflble games can be played at any time, a fully equipped arts and crafts studio, yb_ i, a large cafeteria style kitohen, and a health screening room which would provide space and I privacy for health and counseling services. i Outside development will include a large patio at the rear of the building and expanded parking. This expansion will facilitate the growth of many new programs, activities, and services and will provide the space necessary to serve our rapidly growing senior population. The rapid growth experienced by the police f Department over the past five years is expected to continue. All available space` has been filled. New police officers will continue to be added to the forcer new equipment will be needed, and protection and prevention programs will be expanded with no room for growth. The department is gUickly outgrowing the jail facility as the population increases and the crime rate rises. Parking for both public and police vehicles is barely adequate, and the situation will grow progressively worse each year. -7- t: A law enforcement/court complex similar to those in other cities in the metroplex will help to meet Denton's growing needs. The facility will be designed to accommodate expansion in the future. The complex will also furnish adequate parking areas. i The combined complex will provide police officers with easy access to the courtroom, -prosecutor, and court personnel. The new facility will free up space at the existing police station and save the City more j than a million dollars in rental costs over the next 15 years. The cost to build a new 28,000 square foot law enforcement/court complex and renovate jail area at the existing police station will be 2.6 million dollars Construction would be scheduled to begin in 1990. Use of the Emily Fowler Public, Library is growing with circulation increasing 35 percent r over 1985 j There is no floor space left for new shelving in the junior and teen area 1 , 1 Programs for pre-school children are popular, and at times children are being turned away due to the crowded conditions. When required shelving is added in the adult section, no study or reading space will be available. According to Texas Library Association standards, the Emily Fowler Public Library Is presently inadequate by 20,000 square :feet to serve Denton's population. The proposed 10,000 square foot expansion will be a step toward solving our needs for more space. Denton residents have indentified -recreation centers as their number one recreation facility priority. More than _a half million uses were made of the facilities in 1985. r t , The recreation centers are being used to capacity, Intense scheduling has drastically reduced drop-in time and rental use. -9- i Many children are now unable to participate because they cannot walk or bika to a center. The key to offering a well ro-.:aded program for all Denton residents is t:: have recreation centers in each area of the cft,. The first center will be con, truoted in east Denton and is included 'in .he initial year of the bona program. Centers in northeast and far southeast Denton will be includedin the third and fifth years of the program. Each of the new 20,;00 square foot facilities will be similar to existing centers and will include... .a full sized gymnasium :or athletic events i and activities -a multipurpose room with sitchen facilities for large group meetings -a separate game roon for children to participate in board and tazle games -and classrooms and meeting rooms for instructional programs and neighborhood meetings. ~10~ .r i i The three recreation centers will cost i approximately 1.3 million dollars each over the next five years and will provide thousands of additional Denton residents the chance to participate in hundreds of new programs and classes. f ' Due to the popularity of sports programs and Denton's rapidly growing population, our athletic programs have outgrown our facilities. The Parks and Recreation Department Master plan has identified athletic fields as one of Donton's greatest recreational needs. The bond program will include 1.3 million dollars to provide five new soccer fields at North Lakes, one of which will be lighted, and two new soccer fields at Denia, Four lighted softball fields will be constructed at North Lakes Park and two girls softball E fields will be improved at Denis, i l , i Lighting for four baseball fields; renovation of an existing softball field for baseball, and improving two existing baseball f.ieldb at. Evers, i And lighting two football fields at Evers. t ..l l~ r }Y The new facilities will help move league play out of the neighborhood parks where they are an inconvenience to residents due to the increased noise and traffic created by participants, Athletic field development will help to handle an expected 50 percent increase in sports programs participation over the next five years. The bond program will allow for the construction of a now fire station. This new station will complement a station that was funded in the last bond election and is in the planning process. The first station, which is already funded, will be located in Northwest Denton at Bonnie Brae and Windsor. The second station, which s will be funded in thim program, will be located in Southeast Denton in the golden Triangle Mall area at Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane. One fully equipped fire engine will be 3 needed to provide service from one of the hew fire stations. This new apparatus will reduce the present response time, -12- i 'R {i After an extensive review by a 51 member Blue Ribbon Citizens Advisory Committee, the ' City Council and a growing number of citizens groups and businesses are 3oining together to endorse this bond issue. (QUOTES FROM ONE OR TWO SUPPORTERS WITH TRANSITION IN BETWEEN) The Denton City Council is asking all registered voters in Menton to cast an informed i vote in the December 13 bond election. Voters may give their approval to one or all of the seven propositions appearing on the ballot. Voting will be held from lam to 7pm in the Denton Civic Center. Absentee balloting will begin November 24 in the city secretary's office in City Hall and continue through December 10. Absentee ballot applioations will also ba available at the Denton Senior Center. Cast your vote in favor of Denton to ensure our city keeps pace with the future and never i outgrows the quality of life that makes Denton, rt second to none. { 1 ~13- 141(5. y jl. CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E, MCKINNEY Sr, ! `DENrON, TEXAS 76201 October 10, 1986 Dear ; Enclosed are the following itemet - 1) agenda for October 13, 1986 meeting; 2) memo from the City Manager summarizing annual financial limitation for the capital improvement program; 3) memo from Hugh Ayer, Committee Chairman reoommending Wustments to Subcommittee recommendations (which were approved by Subcommittee chairpersons); 4) list of proposed annual alp expenditures reflecting the above reoommendationat and, 5) reports of the five Subcommittees, 1 met with the ohairpersoa or a representative of each 01P Suboommittee on October 8 for careful study of each report and recommendation. The quality of the reports and recommendations made our task a much more comfortable one to perform, and two ma6or funding issues emerged in terms of satisfying the preferences of each group. Hirst, our vecom ended C1P program totaled $22,287,104.00, an amount that exceeds the funding level that would sooornmodate a $.59 levy by $11139,104.00 (Flnanoe Department estimate of $21,150,000.00). 8coend, some Subcommittees reoom ended shifting projects to the first year of the program because many improvements were needed yesterday. However, the result is that too many dollars were requested in the first year in particular. We took the Subcommittee recommendations, the original Planning and Zoning Commis- sion recommended program, and the targeted total and yearly funding levels and put together a package that we feel will work quite well. We will elaborate and respond to any questions or concerns at the meeting of the full Committee. Please give the enclosed material careful consideration because we will actively solioit the views of all Committee members. Thanks again for all you have done, and we look forward to meeting with you on October 131 1966. Hugh Ayer, Chairman Blue Ribbon CIP Committee eb Enolosure 0395e/0323k 8171666.6200 D1FW M8rR0 4342620 i , M1 M Since the original suggestions for projects and timing was made to Planning and Zoning, a number of events have taken place, These events have caused us to reconsider several items in terms of need or implementation, We would suggeat that the following information be given to the momberci of the Special Citizen's Advisory Committee for Capital Improvements on the following pro jeots . Recently because of some legal requirements we have been advised that we could not reschedule some of the original U,S. 380 monoy, That means for this year's existing CIP Program there is not enough money to complete all of the signal 'renovations, It also means that we will not need the $1,5 million to make the final improvements to U.S. 380 in year 1984-1989. Since we cannot use existing funds, they will have to be used for the U,S. 380 project. We will only need an additional 4600,000 in 1988-1989 for U,S, 380, However, we will need $170,000 to upgrade the Carroll Blvd, signal system, $145000 for signals at Teasley and Londonderry, Carroll and Mulberry, and Windsor and 5herm3n, and $250,000 for turn lanes and Carroll and Eagle, Teasley and Dallas Drive, and 135 and Loop 280 intersections, This equals a need' of $545,000. In order to keep the signal program moving ahead we would suggest that this be funded in 1986-1987. Also in 198E-1987 we oAn eliminate the east Mokinney culvert at a coat of $25,000. Thin elimination is brought about by some dsvololmonta on east McKinney. The developera woro required to build this structure instead of the City since they otiose to develop now. In 1987-1988 we could eliminate the Saline drainage aystem. This project was ES originally scheduled at 4320,000, We were able to do this project now because of a favorable bid that we got on the robu11.dIng of Stuart Road, some development aotivity in the area and souse additional existing 0IP money that was not earmarked for any apecial project, In 1987-1988 we will need an additional $50,000 to extend the drainage lino on Stuart from its existing terminus across the right-of-way of the proposed Loop 288, We would also suggest that a project on Pecan Crook be included, Thia would be ohannel improvements near the Phoenix Apartments, The oast is estimated at $140;000, This project was also a recommendation from Planning and Zoning that was to be substituted for the $900,000 of U,S; 380 money, Another project would be the funding of fire equilanent for the now atation; A now engine would oost $200,000, Also in that year there is a need for a proposod signal at U.B. 380 and Loop 288, The amount for this signal improvement is $64,000. We have been advised by the Highway Department that those signal improvements mus t be made with the first section of Loop 268, This would nooessitato moving this project up to 1986-1987, Finally in fiscal year 1988-1989, we have ~t450,000 elated for as update to the drainage study, We would suggest that $25,000 of this money be agent earlier for "Phase I", which will upgrade our drainage manual and revise our design criteria. We would recommend doing this in fiscal year 1986-1987, Also in Pieoel year 1986-19139 there in an existing recommendation for $150,000 for oversize street paving, The Council is currently considering an ordinance that would eliminate most of the funding of oversising by the City. If this ordinance passee we estimate that that 41.50,000 would not be needed, ej In oonolueion, if all of these recommendationo and suggestions were accepted by the Committee, you would have the following impact on each fie oal years 1986 - We would need an additional $54.5,000 for signal and traffic improvements, $64x400 for the signal at U.S. 380 and Loop 288 and $25,000 for the Phase I of the drainage study. The, total for the additional projects is $634,000. We would also sugges t adding i $110,000 for "',he Paean Crook drainage work. This could be offset by rescheduling of the Loma del Ray drainage ayatem, 1987 - We would eliminate $320,000 for Seline drainage system and I $64000 for the signal at U,S. 380 and Loop 288 that was moved forward. We would recommend adding or using $50,000 of that to extend the Stuart drainage eye tom. We would aleo recommend that the Council consider adding two new projects. We experienced a great deal of flooding in the last year along Paean Creek in the area of the Phoenix Alartments. We ootlmate that drainage improvements would ooet approximately $140000. The total effect on the fiscal year 1987-1988 would be the elimination of $384,000 worth of expenditures. An additional $50,000 worth of drainage improvements at Seline and .$140,000 on Pecan Creek would be added. The net effect would bo a_reduction of $194,000. 1989-1090 - We would reoommend a $900,000 docroaso in :funding for U,u. 380. Thio was due to the legal information that did not allow the Ci by to a Pend exis ting funds now We have inolludod tho original recommendation of Planning and Zoning as well as the reoomrnonded changes for your review. If the auboommitt e has any further questions, the staff and 1 would be happy to try and provi(to any additional information that you may need, R1ok Svehla Assistant City Manager 3071M ,j q