Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-20-1987
AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL Jonuery 20, 1487 i Work Session of the city of Penton City Council on Tuesday, January 20, 19870 at S:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the , Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: i 5:30 p.m. 7 1. Receive an audit report by Deloitte Haskins and Sells, 2. Receive a report on a State Implementation Plan to c^ntrol ozone in Denton County. 3. Receive a report on the 91 emergency telephone system. 4. Executive Se.ision: 1 A. Le al Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 62S2.17 V..T.S. B. Real Esta'e Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 t' V.A.T.S. a C, Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252.1" V./.. T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, January 20, 19870 at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: p 7100 p.m. i. Consider approval of the minutes of the special call a ! meeting of December 16, 1986 2. Public Hearings A , v} A. 2.1847. Petition of Bat-Moody Investments 1~ .r = requesting a change in zoning from multi-feebly (MP-1) to planned development (PD) and approval of a detailed plan. The b.209 acre tract is ° located at the southeast corner of Scripture and Pty streets and shown in 4he E. Puchalski Survey, Abitract 996. If approved, the planned F development will allow medical office land use. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) a A. Consider adoption of ordinance approving a change in toning and spproval of a detailed plan on a 0.209 acre tract, 1 ' , ~y.. ..,m.e...,w .,r..A W..x ~v.. y..&p aOM r.«.mJ., ,nbY.p.f'f~y ~ } t of ~ Y J. n City of Denton City Council Agenda January 20, 1987 Page 2 3. Consent Agenda Each of these itoms is recommended by the Staff and approval *iereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authors:es the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 3.A, 3.B,). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: k, 1. Bid 19682 - Consultation and chemical water treatment (power plant) 2. Bid 19695 - Self Leading Scraper r f ' 3. Bid 19696 - Wire and Cable 4. Bid 19697 - Refuse-Containers 30 YD 5. Bid 19698 - Streetlights 6. P,O. 176753 - 1.B.M. for hardware ($20,000) 7. P.O. 177032 - Trans-Tex Supply for $12,640.00 B. Change Order: 1. Change Order 13 to Atkins Brothers Eouipment Co. for Stuart/Pershing paving and drainage h in the amount of $43,500.00 ' C. Plats and Replats 1. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Denton Pilgrim Addition, Lot 1, Block A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission t i recommends approval.) 26 Consider approval of preliminary plat of the is Whitney Park Addition, Phases I and 11. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) i . °~•:3:ti i ;:4p{iy.A:1 . VrK.~"+11fa4p1Mji'r V+"n KWJ~4tR~s' i, % N .4 i City of Denton City Council Agenda January 20, 1987 Page 3 4a ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids, vin " C~ Consider pt1 of an Change order 03, Bid 1960ordinance Stuart-Pershing Paving and Drainage. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving P.O. #76753 to I.B.M. for hardware. F, Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and establishing a school safety speed :one around t... the Robert F. Lee Elementary School. (Citizens Traffie Safety Support Commission recommends approval) S, Resolutions A, Consider adoption of a resolution in appreciation of Charlotte Allen. Consider ado tion of a resolution for intensity B, ' sttoeation (first cone, first served). (The Plannin and Zoning Commission recommends -rr approval.) C. Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to 'x sign a contract with Port - A - Port. ' D, Consider a resolution authorizing a committee to assist the Public Utilities Board and the City ~p Council in their consideration of capital recovery fees, 8. Consider a resolution adopting one (t) personnel poltcl08,03 Use of smoke and smokeless tobacco A! c ' i ~ a rr.•,-..,_, . ........r....,„:...«.-,.... _ awe's..-;. M4'x+1 '-iniaAfi't ~ ` de 41 ^ City of Denton City Council Vends rYj' January 10, 1987 Page 4 i 6. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 7. New Business I This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 8. Hold a discussion to consider the appointment of members to the Beautification Task Force. 91 Hold a discussion on fob specifications for the City 1 Secretary position. lo. Official Action on Executive Session Itemst A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate s C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 11. Executive Session: 1 ~Y. A, Leggal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252.17 V,A.T.S, 3 B. Peat Estate Under Sec. 2(fArt. 625217 r C. Personnel/Board Apppointments Under Sec. 1( Art 6252-17 V,A.T,S. (see item 17 and 18 above) CERTIFICATE s I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin boa0 at the Ci y t f the ity ton, Texas on the 16 day of l9 o'cloci of, 3r} -0 2S32C y 1 l AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL January 20, 1987 Work Session of the City ppof Denton City Council on Tuesday, January 20,Buildingt at30which Ithehefollowingfeitemsoowill the Muicipal cone deredt 5:30 P.M. Receive an audit report by Deloitte Haskins and Sells. 2. Receive a report on a state Implementation Plan to control ozone in Denton County. 3, Receive u report on the 911 emergency telephone system. Y 4, Executive Session: ! A. Leggal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252.17 V,A,T,S. B. Real Estate tinder Sec. 2{fArt, 6252.17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Apppointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art 6252-17 V,A.T,S, Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, January 200 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7.0 P.M. 1, Consider approv,+t :)f the minutes of the special call k meeting of December 16, 1986 rti, 2. Public Hearings A. Z-1847. Petition of Ball-Moody Investments requesting a change in toning from multi-family (MP-1) to planned development UP) and approval located eat it he southeasthcorner0 ofaScripturet and v Pry streets and shown in the V. Puchtheki planned Abstract 996. If approved, ax development will allow medical office land use, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 1 A. Consider adoption doE aede~ailcdn plane onga in zoning and approval 0.209 acre tract, v4 lur.'n wv lKk^!4ao v~}F4 .4' . r' I City of Denton City Council Agenda January 20, 1987 Page 2 i 3. Consent Agenda Poch of these items is recommended by the staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations, A proval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in a;cordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to he approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information 1s attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 3.A, 3.B,), This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: ` I 1. Bid 19682 - Consultation end chemical water t treatment (power plant) 2. Bid 19695 - Self Leading Scraper b n~ 31 Bid 19696 - Wire and Cable rF 4, Bid 19697 - Refuse Containers 30 YD S. Bid 19698 - Streptlights 6, P.O. 176753 - 1,B,M, for hardware ($20,000) ` 71 P,O. 177032 - Trans-Tex Supply for $12,640.00 A. Change Order: f 10 Change Order 13 to Atkins Brothers Fquipment Co, for Stuart/Pershing poving and drainage In the amount of $43,500.00 t C. Plats and Replats 1, Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Denton Pilgrim Addition, Lot 10 Block A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission 'a recommends approval,) 2. Consider approval of preliminary Whitney Park Addition plat of the f Phases I and II, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) F. 2 a ~r; .r. . . E9'$a'1`H.Y"~M~'.YW!!~dPay+R:u..c«,.. ,.+..k .,a• bW I=Xd +.l M t.Sau'4.vntE ~o.,C4iF#rv+,}'1:. i.Nrv4Jb Lam.. r..:q y f+Y rv Yarr«. . } T 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda January 10, 1987 Page 3 s q, Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. C. Consider adoption of an ordin Stuart aPershinis ' Change Order 030 Bid #9609 1 R. Paving and Drainage. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving P.O. 176753 to I.B,M. for hardware, j' E. Consider adoption of an ordinance desigr.ztina and s k;y establishing a school safety speed zone around li the Robert E. Led Blementary School. (Citizens r t Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval) Resolutions A. Consider adoption of a resolution in appreciation of Charlotte Allen, B , Consider ado tion of a resolution for intensity F first (first come, first served). {The Planning and tolling Commission recommends approval,) C. Consider a resolution authorising the Mayor to sign a contract with Port - A - Port, r t; D, Consider a resolution authorizing a committee to 4 ~ . Council the Putheir Uticonsiderati n of thcepItaI all recovery fees, E, Consider a resolution adopting one (1) personnel polio s 108103 Use of smoke and smokeless tobacco f ~ r r r City of Denton City Council Agenda January 20, 1987 Page 4 6. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager, 7. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 8, Vold a discussion to consider the appointment of i members to the Beautification Task Force, 'R 96 Hold a discussion on job specifications for the City Secretary position. 10, Official Action on Executive Session Items: ffi A, Legal Matters 1 B. Real Fstate C. Personnel ° D, Board Appointments ll. Executive Session; A, Leg al Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252-17 N ~3 V. A.T.S, B, Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252.17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2( Art 62S2-17 V.A.T,S. (see item 07 and 18 above C F R T I F I C A T F Icertify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the ^se bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Penton, Texas on the day of _ 1986 at o'cloci • (a.m.) psm. s I CITY SPCRY?AFY a~ is 2SS2C t . ,....+.w +,.:.s t.,....~a-...e„ .w 4"ovwAY YAM+w.. t 3 V liv J,I3 CIT1+ofOffh7M, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TE fPHONE (811) 846.8301 p f Nice of the City 14anap t M E M O R A N D U M E I TOi Mayor and Members of the city council lROMI Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager s ~,r 4'a DATE) January 16, 1987 SUBJECTt January 20 Council Meeting ; Each of you received an audit report several weeks ago in your ? agenda packets, The audit report is by Deloitte, Haskins and Sells and is to be discussed at the 5130 p,m, session of the City Council meeting scheduled January 20, 1967. please bring your copy of the audit report to that meeting. a ` L10 y V, Earr ll " ~ City Manager .y 3266M i ' err .w'.♦ ~ fir' 'S ~,nr'i i .~:'1dNW{iNc!"». ...,,.•..,-......«a.Wrs'.n+•a.'m o-.....,.... .••,,,n,9►uw,aV~a~rwFSa+u,«Hd+-~•.,+.:~.«N:eN~irW'Yf;+r1!:,imJ ~w,1'ar~++rw+. «,w»....n...v....«-.-_.- " r i r ' t t a ~M C2 , h " CITY of DENTON / 215 E, McKinney / Denton, Texas !6201 Ik MEMORANDUM r Dater January 15, 1987 Too Mayor and City Council F'roms Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Development r Subjects Air Quality ,a'la Attached is the proposed air quality implementation plan for tk Denton County. Also attached is the public hearing schedule. The Texas Air Control Hoard will expect cities in the county And the county government to take a policy position regarding the proposal. i Je Or 's JMlab Attachments 'w l4 , I I:r 1 Ir ss ~ .r Ct y X. L , k1 .J~..•.,xM.:aa orlr bfoY`.{L:P.IM4.YM1rrqA'Mww+a...r,. -~y r, ISSUES PAPER STATE IFPIEQNtfATION K" REVISIONS DENTON COUNT! • INTRODUCTION The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has called for the development of State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to i reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in Denton County. These controls are required because ozone levels measured at tho one Denton County monitor have exceeded the National Ambient Air Qaality Standard (NAAQS). Ozone is formed in the atmosphere when VOCs react with oxygen and nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight. EPA has required increasingly more stringent ozone control strategies over the past 15 years in most major metropolitan r` and industrial areas in Texas. Despite past efforts, however, ozone levels above the NAAQS continue to be measured. The ra most recent SIP revisions were submitted in September, 1985 ? for Dallas and Tarrant counties. EPA now proposes to extend controls into adjacent areas. 4 REQUIRMENTS FOR DENTON COUNTY ` In areas where the ozone standard is exceeded, EPA requires 7t.E sufficient VOC controls to be implemented to demonstrate attainment of the standard or that all reasonable efforts are being made to reach attainment. The following controls, which have been considered reasonable in other areas of the state, are being evaluated for Denton Countyn A- Annual vehicle emission inspection/maintenance (I/M) programs, s - Transportation control measures (TCMs) such as improve- r,. - ments in public transit and reductions in traffic congea- tion, s, t? - Restrictions on industrial growth by requiring new sources of VOC to obtain equivalent emission reductions ` from existing sources, Controls on gasoline marketing, - Controls on degreasing operations, Controls on industrial surface coating operations, k^, - Restrictions on the use of cutback asphalt in road I i construction, I a. - Controls on solvent-usage operations (dry cleaning, 4 printing, eto.), T s i 1. ~ If an approvable SIP revision is not submitted or is not pro- porly implemented, EPA may promulgate and enforce unilateral federal control strategies and/or impose sanctions including$ - Withholding of federal highway funding in Denton County j (this could be as much as $2 million in FY87 and $13 million in FY88,) - Curtailing of industrial growth involving VOC emissions, - Withholding of federal funds for air pollution control programs (amounts at EPA discretion), - Withholding of federal funds for sewage treatment facilities (not anticipated). Fj"NCTATIOMS AND DECISIONS Through circulation of this paper and by conducting public meetings in Denton County to discuss the issues, the Texas Air Control Board (TACB) staff hopes to solicit public involvement in the SIP revision process. As part of this involvement, we are seeking comments on the work being conducted and ideas which may help produce the most effective and economically f feasible plan for the area. , Fk Comments and suggestions received will be considered in the X development of draft SIP revisions and associated regulation changes which will be brought to a public hearing in Denton p County next spring. The concerns and desires of local elected officials, citizens, and community leaders can influence the scope and nature of these revisions. t; 0100 MDMM IUNG IM DEMTOM COUNTY In June, 1984, EPA Region 6 notifiod the TACB that a SIP revi- I X'q Sion would be required to address high ozone values measured at a monitoring site in Denton County. Peak ozone concentra- tions exceed the NAAOS of 0.12 ppm some two to sixteen days per year with the highest values reaching 0.17 ppm. This monitor was originally sited in 1981, five miles north of the Dallas/ Denton county boundary, to satisfy EPA criteria for ozone monitoring downwind of the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. It was not intended to be representative of the air quality 'n affected by sources located in Denton County. In fact, wind trajectory analyses indicate that sources in Denton County may Wa,. have contributed to high ozone values on only two of the ten 1 days with the highest ozone levels recorded (0.16 ppm and 0,13 ppm) in Denton County from 1983 through 1985. Even for these two days, however, meteorological records indicate that j the air mass had passed over the Dallas/Fort Worth area on the previous days. Analyses indicate that controls applied in Denton County may not change peak ozone concentrations moa- cured at the Denton County monitoring site, and attainment of the ozone standard will be dependent upon emission reductions in Dallas and Tarrant counties. -2- a .G}w F.a r.,r a~.,v .r. l~ . I In July, 1984, the TACO requested further clarification of EPA policy and provided documentation indicating that a SIP revi- sion for Denton Cotinty would be ineffective. EPA, however, maintained its position that a SIP revision was necessary. on Octc'jer 4, 1985s the TACO staff submitted a formal request to EPA that thu call for a SIP revision for ozone in Denton County be rescinded. In May, 19860 EPA notified the Governor of its denial of the rescission request. EPA stated that the frimary reason for requiring a SIP revision in Denton County s'not because of locally generated emissionat rather because commuter traffic from "Denton County is directly linked to the nonattainment problems in Dallas and Tarrant counties" and Denton County "must contribute to the solution." The North Central Texas Council of Governments (N:TCOG) staff has esti- mated that commuter traffic from Denton County contributes 3.28 of the total vehicle miles traveled in Dallas and Tarrant counties. Therefore, implementation of the vehicle parameter I/M program in Denton County may reduce VOC emissions by 407 of the 440868 tons per year (0.91) needed to demonstrate attainment in the two adjacent urban counties STATUS OF THE DALLAS AND TARRANT OOUVff SIP REVISIONN EPA has proposed approval of the regulations included in the latest SIP revisions for Dallas and Tarrant counties. However, y °t those controls can not achieve sufficient VOC emission reduc- tions to demonstrate attainment of the ozone standard. In order to satisfy EPA requirements for such circumstances, the L. TACO has committed to evaluate additional control options and to implement all measures conuidered reasonable. One of the suggested national strategies is the expansion of VOC controls f "o impplemented in urban counties into surrounding rural counties. I Whits no specific requirements have been provided to the TACO, it is possible that the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, with all k, of its adjacent counties, may ultimately be addressed under E one comprehensive control plan. D19TENUMATION OF THE AMOUNT O! CONTROLS RMUIRED 01 EPA guidelines specify that the days with the highest ozone levels recorded during the most recant three-year monitoring a; period be evaluated to estimate the percentage of VOC emission reductions required to demonstrate attainment in the area. r The reduction percentage must be based on a day when the emis- siond contributing to the elevated ozone levels are generated in Denton County only. Preliminary results indicate that VvC emissions must be reduced by approximately 19-201 in Denton 1 County in order to demonstrate attainment of the ozone ' tcendard, The TAGS performed an inventory of VOC sources in Denton Cw my for 1985. An evaluation of vehicle travel, using county- specific information in computer projection models, estimated` -3- i y W yy f i highway emissions to be 4,743 tons/year (T/Y). Other mobile source emissions from aircraft, boats, trains, and off-highway { vehicles contributed another estimated 1,103 T/Y. Only one major stationary source was identified, with emissions of i 107 T/Y. Combined minor and area source emissions are esti- mated to be 3,582 T/Y. Therefore, total Denton County VOC ` emissions in 19850 from all source categories, were approxi- mately 9,535 T/Y. As identified by computer modeling, the 1985 Denton County ! base inventory must be reduced by 19-20% or approximately 1,860 T/Y (from 9,535 T/Y to approximately 7,675 T/Y) in order to demonstrate attainment. The fo?lowing control measures may be expected to reduce VoC emissions as indicateda Reduction Estimates Control Measure 1987 1992 1997 Federal Motor Vehicle 837 T/Y 1,249 T/Y 1,554 T/Y { Control Program (FMVCP) Vehicle Parameter -0- 828 588 t ;a Inspection/Maintenance f F! Program (I/M) n of Regulations t Ex •nsio F' to Denton Countyi a' Surface Coating -0- 150 150 Degreasing -0- 198 239 E Dry Cleaning -0- 130 157 W Stage I Vapor Recovery -0- 399 412 t' Cutback Asphalt -0- 19 19~ r TOTAL 837 T/Y 2,973 T/Y 3,119 T/Y Mr` Additionally, control measures must also compensate for the ! estimated increase in area and minor source emissions of 995 T/Y by 1992 and 1,776 tone by 1997 resulting from popula- tion growth. Therefore, while attainment can be demonstrated x by 1992, continued growth is expected to overshadow potential emission reductions by 1997. w ' 1992 1997 P r ,,k Required Reductions 2,855 T/Y 30636 T/Y ! Expected Reductions 2 973 T /Y 3,119 T Y Difference 118 T/Y 517 T/Y' s (Excess) (Shortfall) .4- 31i, .ti ¢ 1.. f J" u. ;may d dW „ a,... aV .,.F t,:,'µ~,'.'y i i EPA is considering a national policy regarding seve4a1 addi- tional controls which could further reduce VOC emissions in Denton County if they are implemented. These includes . Stage II vapor recovery at gasoline service stations during vehicle refueling, - On-board carbon cannisters for the control of evaporative emissions and vehicle refueling, and Seasonal limitations on the volatility of gasoline j stored or marketed in the metropolitan area. EI COSSOL HMUXTS AID COSTS If f Ozone is a pungent, colorless gas which in high concentrations may cause respiratory irritation, headaches, and fatigue and } i can damage vegetation and cause deterioration in tubber, fabrics, and other commercially important materials. EPAY established the national standard for ozone at a level which , presumably would protect the most sensitive individuals from ~r adverse health effects. Research is continuing to document the health effects of ozone in a.der to properly assess the Fa . validity of the current oze:.a standard. The traditionally accepted method of reducing ozone by con- trolling VOC has had a questionable impact on monitored ozone levels. Ozone concentrations in Texas and other areas have sr not improved even after the implementation of extensive and 5 " costly VOC control measures. ?i while no clear correlation to ambient ozone reductions is apparent, VOC cc.atrols may be beneficial in reducing emissions of materials which cause documented health effects. For exam- ple, the vehicle I/M program may help to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulates as well as carcinogens (1,3-butadiene and benzene), irritants (aldehydes, acids, hexane, etc.), and other odorous and undesirable sub- x. stances. In addition, a substantial cost credit may result s. from the product recovered as a result of come VOC vapor con- trol requirements, such as controls on gasoline terminals, gasoline tank trucks, industrial degreasing operations, and other solvent-usage industries. f° The TACO staff has estimated the cost of implementing control meacu:es which may be considered for Denton County. The cost 4 of the stationary source controls was determined to be reason- able in the develop.aent of the previous SIP revisions and has been adjusted to reflect county-specific information. Vehicle I/M program costs include approximately $771,000 in annual administrative costs and approximately $2,671,000 in repair costs for individuals who fail the inspection. While the resultant cost/ton of an r/M program appears hig's, the program z will likely be required for EPA approval of the SIP revisions. ? y i r Control Measure Annual Cost Cost/Ton FMVCP -0- -0- Parameter I/M Program $3,442,000 $4,157 Extension of Regulationse Surface Coating 13,350 89 Degreasing 22,770 115 Dry Cleaning 670080 516 Stage I Vapor Recovery 78,600 197 Cutback Asphalt -0- -0- IE TOTAL With Stationary Controls Only $181,800 Average $203 TOTAL With I/M $3,623,800 Average $20102 AGMIES I111 MED IN DEVELOPING THE DE1"N ODUNTr SIP REVISIONS In addition to any control efforts determined to be necessary ` by the a en y g cy, the TACB responds to EPA requirements, state legislative initiatives, and local requests as part of its program to protect air quality. This includes the development of SIP revisions and regulations in accordance with EPA guide- lines and the coordination of state actions with local offi- cials and citizens, The North Central Texas Council of Governments is the desig- nated metropolitan planning organization for the entire ballas/ Fort Worth area, including Denton County. It assists the TACB in preparing emission inventories, analyzing transportation controls, conducting various public information activities, and coordinating the participation of local officiaas. The Department of Public Safety (DPS) is responsible for the ` implementation and administration of the parameter I/M program in any area required by the SIP. If the parameter program is expanded to include Denton County, tho DPS would train and regulate authorized inspectors, monitor and report inspection 01 results, enforce program requirements, and assist in public awareness activities. f~ The Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation pro- video vehicle travel data to assist in estimating emissions frcm vehicles in a county including the number of vehicle YS; > miles traveled, as well as the mix of vehicles by model year and vehicle type. err ADbITIOMM IM MATION rot mire detailed information, please contact Mr. Russ Baier, Regulation Development Section, Texas Air Control Board, 6330 Highway 290 Last, Austin, Texas 78723, (512) 451-57110 Ext. 283. a; -6- 4 1 i r TEXAS AIR CONTROL BOARD 6330 HWY. 290 EAST AUSTIN,TEXAS 78723 JOHN L, BLPIR 51211513711 VITTORIO K. ARGENTO, P. E. ChtirTtn BOB G. BAILEY CHARLES A.JAYNES FRED HARTMAN Vlo Chairmen `'j 0. JACK KILIAN, M. 0. s OTTO R. KUNZE, Ph. 0,. P. E. ALLEN ELI BELL R. HAL MOORMAN Executive Director HUBERT OXFOR0,111 i ' ANNOUNCEMENT OF PUBLIC MEETINGS BY THE TEXAS AIR CONTROL BOARD ON PROPOSED REVISIONS } TO THE STATE IMPLEMENTATIOW PLAU The Texas Air Control Board (TACO) will hold public meetings r 4r in February to discuss proposed revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone in Denton County. The meetings are cosponsored by the TACB and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). The meetings will be held at the following times and piacesr February 10, 1987 700 p.m. February 11, 1987 9100 a.m. Lewisville Recreation Center City of Denton 191 Civic Circle City Council Chambers Lewisville, Texan 215 East McKinney Street M Denton, Texas The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has called for 1 the development of SIP revisions to reduce emission of vola- tile organic compounds (VOC) in Denton County. These controls are required because ozone levels measured at the one Denton County monitor have exceeded the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The TACB and NCTCOG staff will discuss the reduction potential and estimated costs of possible VOC control measures at these meetings. Preliminary estimates indicate that VOC emissions + in the county must be reduced by 19-20% to satisfy EPA re- t quirements for an attainment demonstration. Reduction of VOC g emissions car, be accomplished by implementation of a vehicle parameter int~pection/maintenance (I/M) program, control of evaporative emissions from service stations (Stage I), and control of process emissions from surface coating, degreasing, dry-cleaning, and cutback asphalt operations. Sufficient re- ductions may be available to demonstrate attainment by 1992. i •e ' I Y } rA Celebest6q 150 Yeen of Tt%&s lodependeect 1836 • 1986 '1~1 Y'S7Q$~.:~:-~r4.•.~,... ,.•am.i.~ a'.: ..o r'd1~a . i i PAGE TWO ' The total annual cost of implementing these controls is approximately $3,623,800. -j ' The TACB staff anticipates that, due to the proximity of the Denton County me-nitor to the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, " attainment of the ozone standard in Denton County will be dependent upon control strategies applied in Dallas and I Tarrant counties. However, other benefits associated with VOC emission controls (reduction of specific potentially toxic materials) will be discussed and considered. n Comments received at the public meetings will help the TACB staff develop SIP revisions to satisfy EPA requirements and respond to the concerns of the public and local elected offi- cials. An issues paper has been prepared which presents and discusses information pertaining to the procedures, emission reduction benefits, and costs associated with implementing control measures in Denton County. Copies of this paper may be obtained from the TACB Fort Worth regional office, 6421 ' Camp Bowie Boulevard, Suite 312, Fort Worth, Texas 76116 (817-732-5531), or from the TACB central office, 6330 Highway 290 East, Austin, Texas 78723 (512-451-5711). Issued in Austins Texas on this the 12 th day of January, 1987. ^ ! z r Men El Bel Executive D actor ;l Texas Ai ontrol Board t y6 i., Irk 4+llf l,nV , ~T ! i ra 1. M1r mi . 5!: 3 I I .v a- 2'~1 yy ^ t - - s... ..4 l:u}n'ff], lar¢.iii Y ~8wr. sly ♦ 5✓'`'i.....✓.-. i Yl Yfrfr3 ifPrM... .v D OF R'I'CE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO. Councilmember Jim Alexander Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney SUBJECT: 911 Legislation; art. 1432e, V.A.C.S. DATE: January 9, 1987 ' Pursuant to our conversation earlier today and in accordance with ■y earlier conversations with Rick, I have examined art. rc 1432e-I V.A.C.S., to determine the method of appointment of members to the Board of Managers of an Emergency Communication District. As you stated, two voting members are appointed by the Commissioners Court and two voting members are appointed jointly by all cities lying wholly or partly within the County. As I explained earlier, I believe the best way to accomplish rr these appointments is to have each city council or commission in the County adopt the same resolution. I have attached a form F for such appointments. While the appointment could be made without a formal resolution and by means of a minute entry, it will be much cleaner and the attorneys will be much better off in preparing submission to the Attorney General, etc., if there is a formal document. You have also asked who calls the elections. Sec. 11(a) and (d) > of art. 1432e state that the board shall call an election to ' confirm the creation of the district. aka The cost of the election shall be shared on a per capita basis based upon the most recent U. S. Census bureau population data between the incorporated cities within the County and the County population o£ all unincorporated areas. Thus it appears we would divide the costs, each city bearing a stare, based upon its 1980 census population, with the County bearing the remainder xf of the costs, I doubt that this would entail an expense of over $5,000 for any of the cities and thus, would not entail the pass- age,of an ordinance or resolution. An election budget should be prepared and initial contributions could be made based upon those d , r ,gpja xw..._, ,.,~a:, t;v .i i✓ d^'r YrL4 .y .".it> As.,#, cw a4. ~ a s Councilman Jim Alexander January 9, 1937 ` Page Two figures and any adjustments made post-election if the actual expenses are different. Should you have any other questions relative to this matter, please advise. gW Respectfully submitted, J S` KATQYOFCH DADSjs xci Lloyd Y:' Harrell, City Manager` $tl Y 1'. Ys4 x.. ~ f+l i . a s - _~~jr},lrlBElrJ17W "'j'4,•rw .r~:YW-:.,'A,,Yi~7s.iCYi.MSa:.hY':t'n,K.i{,»Y,'.~it'ir.9 JrJe: Mnei..J..•'~NM~°i 4+,aMw...r.,,. .ir wr ~ f 19431 RESOLUTION NO. w A RESOLUTION APPOINTING TWO MEMBERS TO THE INITIAL BOARD OF MANAGERS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION DISTRICT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Article 14320, V.A.C.S. provides that two voting members of the initial Board of Managers of an Emergency Communication District shall be appointed jointly by all cities and towns lying wholly or partly with the district; and WHEREAS, the City of wishes to a`'= make such appointments; ` NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF SECTION I. ` hereby appoints That the City of an Y as mess era to the n t a oard o anagers o the 'Emergency Communication District of Denton County. A; „s SECTION II. r That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon ti 5 , t,r its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989. r} M MAYOR CITY OF yea , r ATTEST : SECRETARY CITY OF { APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF BY: r' 11 e y<4 Pi.a .r, r...... 5 ~ t. o iIf, 'r r b, y: 19431 P RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPOINTING TWO MEMBERS TO THE INITIAL BOARD OF MANAGERS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION DISTRICT; AND ` DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, Article 1432e, V.A.C.S. provides that two voting . members of the initial Board of Managers of an Emergency Communication District shall be a pointed jointly by all cities i+ and towns lying wholly or partly with the district; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas wishes to make such appointments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF < DtNTONs TEXAS: SECTION I. That the City of Denton, Texas hereby appoints and as ■ea ers to the initial oar of Managers o the mergency Communication ' District of Denton County. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become eff;ctive immediately upon its passage and approval. 1 , Ogf • PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987. i a rrc t 't'F 1AY 1~ 6 ' MAYO-V ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMr „r DEBRA.ADAMI DRAYOVITCF1j CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r,r~+ Sys P M S ' ue~ yy c y The Work session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday. December 16. 1966 at S:00 P.M. in the Civil Defense Room of the t Municipal Building. PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Council Members Alexander. :r Hopkins. MCAdaae, and Riddleslecger. i ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tea Alford: Council Meeber Chew ~ j The following items were Considered: a' 1. The Council received an ovecview reps,, on the proposed utility Cate adjnstant. t Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, Introduced Mr. John Wagner r who was one of the consultants on the pcoJect. John Magner gave an overview of how the Cate changes would affect the different types of users. Wastewater would have no change: electric would have a dettease: water, an Increase. Ht r stated that about S1 Was needed tot the short term revenue requirements and the cost Would be tog tutute cevsnue !B coquicaments. Council %taber Chow Joined the meeting. Mayor Stephens asked that it the residential was down, would the small user in residential category also have a decrease. Magner replied that there was no change In the structure of the Cealdeatial Gatos. Mayor Stephens eeked for a compaction between the business and vr residential rates. Nelson stated that with a stall business, the first Skw had no charge. A small tee dance paid approxiuteiy 1 1121 pet kW and a small busin*ae paid depending on the Cara neags. He also t, 4 stated that on an Investment basis, industry was paying mote and the cesideatial customer was not .1111 to the Same rate. The y, tats adjustment would try to get that note in line. Mayor Pro Tom Alford joined the meeting, H Nelson showed the Council an ovethead regarding the effects of { the Caviled Proposed Cates on selected t pea of services. He r stated that the Public Utilities Board had tacoamondad the rate sdjusteont. It was brought to the Council tonight tot CwUW and Would soon come to the council in ocdinaace tots. The Council hold discussions With State aspreeantitive Jim Horn ! } at 10 p.m. in the Civil Det+mat Room at the Municipal ! Suit fig. The Council hold discussions with State Repceaentattve Jia Horn regarding Various issues. Among that, tested Were (1) the NLC n proposal of bead+nlnq sales tax, (2) state income sue, (1) City/County hospitals, (4) the hdseetead pmends+nt, (S) Tare h reforms, and (6) the police retirement system. x 2. The Council convened Into the Executive Station. ` The Council then convened Into the Spacial meeting at 6100 p.m. + in the Council Chambers, PRESENT, Mayor Stephens; Mayot Pro Tom Altords Council M1abaft AteaandeC, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams, and RiddtesDKget ,p o AESENTt Nona r ' ` r ~n Jdm iiuL T 1 r,.. ' . a City of Denton City Council Mlautes December 14. 1916 I Page 2 The tollowing items were constdeteds I (tea 63 was moved ahead to the order. 3. Consent Agendal rr Each of these items is recommended by the Start anA approval thereof will be ■ttictly on the basis of the Start recom- mendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorixae the City t Manager of his designee to taplasent each item in accordance i with the Staff toconendationt. t` Listed below are bide and purchase otdecs to be approved tot payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information to attached to the * ordinances (Agenda items 4.A, and 4.8). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Masbate to a discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinanc6. r A. Bids &Rd Purchase Otdeter 1. Bid 0 9464 - Extension of bid for mobile radios 2. Bid N 961S - Luse/putchaslnq financing 3. Bid N 9616 - lidtaq mowera i 4. Bid 0 9611 - Nest Hickory and Watch street paving and dtatnage S. Bid B 9619 - Painting office complex/ , r, `r warehouse .7 Riddlespotgot motion, chow second to approve the consent Agenda as pteseated. Notion cattied unanimously. 3 1. Otdiniaceft F` A. The Council coafideted adoption of ran ordinance. accepting competitive bids and providing tot the award of eoateaea toe the purchase Of ut6tialt. a9uiDmeat, supplier of y, u[chau 6efvioes. p The following ordinance was considered: • NO. I6-241 AN O1D(NANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE 9105 AND ANARDING A C^NTRACT TOR THE PURCHASE Of MATERIALB, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SB1sI0E61 PROVIDING POE THE EXPENDITURE Of PUNDS THE2E101E1 AND PROVIDING !OR AN LIfLCTivE OATS. NSF . McAdams motion, Altord second to adopt the oediaance, On toll y" call vote, McAdams Maya," Alaaandet 'aye." Hopkins wsY6,0 • Alford ways.' Riddlesperget "aye," Chew •aye,• and Mayor Stephens •sys.• Votion carried unanimously. 1. The Council eonaidited adoption of an dtdinance accepting competitive bids atd prov14tnq tot the award of contracts tot public works or imptovements. ; The following otdinance was cdnsidoteds `r NO. 66-249 l; AN OlOtHANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BtDB AND PROVIDING POR THE t ANASO Of CONTRACTS TOE PUBLIC NORKS OR iMPROVEMEN161 PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURt OY tUNDS THEREy0R1 AND PROVIDING Vol AY LltmtvE DATE. } . n I i 11 r i f City of Denton city council Minutes December 16, 1916 Page 3 McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ocdinancs. On Cell call vote, MCAdaa,s "aye," Alexander "aye." HOpkine "aye," Alfotd "aye." Riddlespecgec "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayo[ q, + Stephens "aye." Motion cactied unanimously. ' C. The Council considered adoption of an ocdinancs canvassing bond election teturns. { The tollowiny otdinance was considered: i NO. 16-250 i THE STATE OF TEXAS = COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OP DENTON WHEREAS, the City Council of said City o[doced an ' i election to be held in said Clty on DECEMBER 17, 1966, on the PROPOSITIONS hereinattet stated: and WHEREAS, $aid City Council has investigated all ; Y sattate pettaining to said election, including the ordartnq, giving motive, officers, holding, ■nd making ratuens of said election: and WHEREAS, the election ofticats who held said election have duly sad* the r,etucns of the [e salt thereof, and said teturns have been duly dellveted to this City Council. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OT DENTON HERESY ORDAINSt 1. That the City Council officially finds and detetmines that said election was duly ocdeted, that peo ppc { notice of said election was duly given, that ptopet election ottlcete veto duly appointed prioc to said election, that said election vat duly held, that due cetucas of the eesult of said election have boon suds and dsliveced, and that the City Council has duly canvassed $oil totutae, 411 in accotdanee with law and the oediasoes calling said election. 2. That the City Council ttlciatly finds and t tetetmines that the following votes veto cast at said election on each subsitted PROPOSITION, by the cesident, qualified sloctots of said City who voted at the election: t # PROPOSITION No. -I t" 1676 VOTES: FOR I s )THE ISSUANCE OF 17,716,000 )OF STREET AND TRAFFIC CONTROL ) IMPROVEMENT sONDB 428 VOTES: AOAtWST ) 2 ,4^ • P1OHO4lt101( NO. I~J 1644 YOf68t FOR ITHE ISSUANCE OF 1114440000 OF )DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT BONDS ? 472 VOTESt AGAINST ) PAOPOSITIOM MOy,I, 1157 VOTE62 FOIL I )THE ISSUANCE of $ISS.000 OF )ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER BONDS w, 610 VOTES: AGAINST ) r , r;r l ; City of Denton city council minutes December 16, 1986 S Page 4 SROPOSITION NO. 4 i 1651 YOTEB: FOR I )nM ISSUANCE OF (7000,000 OT )MIRE STATION BONDS y 411 VOTES: AGAINST PROPOSITION NO. S i, 1414 VOTES% FOR ) • )THE ISSUANCE OT 0,950,000 OF )PARK tMPROVE1lENT (ATHLETIC )YIELD AND NEIGHBORHOOD AND )SENIOR CSTtttN/ COMMUNITY x; )CENTER) BONDS 611 VOTE9: AGAINST ) PROPOSITION NO, 4 1397 VOTES: FOR I e- )THE 166VANCE or S1,000,000 It )LIBRARY BONDS 69S VOTES: AGAINST ) F PROPOSITION NO. 7 1419 VOTES: FOR THE )LAM EISSUANCE or 2..000 NFORCEMENT fAND6COURT of )BUILDING BOND4 642 VOTES: AGAINST 1 J'," fl 1. That the city council officially tInds, ~C detetminss, and declares the result of said election to be that t the toregoing PROPOSITIONS so submitted have received a i favorable majority vote in all t4speets and have cartied• and that the bonds voted thereunder may be issued in a0e0t96nce 'r',• with law. Alexander motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordt:ance. On "a roil call vote, Whdaas Nays," Atoxandet '8Y4,' Hopkins "eye," Altard Karam Riddlespotger Nsye.N Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stephens "are." notion Carried Unanimously. Mayot Stephens departed from the agoods to issue a `.4 procluation. The proelevation was presented toe National „ Drunk and Drugged Driving Awareness Meek, Deceabot 1s-21, lslt. The ptaelamation was road by Mayor Stophons and presented to teprasentatives of the talk force. D. The Council censtdated adoption of an otdlnanc4 authorislag the Mayor to execute an agt4aaent with Haywood Jordan McCowan and Gary Jutem Atchiteets And Company foisting " • to the rendering of ptofesalenal architectuent services tot the design of a eoamunity building, ` The following otdinaneo was aonsidezed: No. esasl AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH HAYWOOD JORDAN MCCOWAM AND OKAY JUREN ARCHITECTS t COMPANY RELATING TO THE RENDERING OF rROtlSSiONAL ARCHITECTURAL BEBVICEB FOR THR DE110N OF A COMMUNITY CRNTERI AND PROYIDttld t' rot AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 4° 4 r Debts Dravovttch, City Attorney, stated that an aaemdment to the Contract had been dlsttibuted to the Council and was to be adopted as part of the motion. Vii.' a= t . y' . y, ' 6 [ City Of Denton City Council Minutes i December 16, 1986 Page s Lloyd Hactell, City MAnagec, stated that the Amendment W36 A clarification in more precise lanquage, the relationship between the City and the architectural tics if the firm was f!` + used tot the second and third community oentecs which veto pact of the bond package. Chew motion, MCAdaRA second to adopt the motion. On toll call E'k vote. McAdams *aye,* Alexandet •ayt," Hopkins "aye," Alford i "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens l "aye." Motion carried unanimously. E, The Council considered adoption of an ocdtna,ice •i authorizing the City of Denton to contract with CTiC Associates tot cable televlsicn cefcanchisement consulting services with f a tht amount of the contract not to excred 127,810.00. i Tba following ordinance was considetedi N0. 86-252 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON y j AND CTIC ASSOCIATES FOR P80YESSlONAL SEBYICL"Si APPROVING THE } it EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORES AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE GATE. Alexander motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Altocd "aye,' RIddlesPerget "aye," Chew "aye." and Mayoc Stephens "aye." Motion. catrled unanimously. F, The Council considered adoption of an otdieance approving an agreement providing for the lease of office space s'.. at 126 East McKinney Street. The following ordinance was considecedi 8l NO. 66-2sl I AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR UE LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE AT 226 EAST MCKINNBY STREET, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Lloyd Hatcelt, City Manager, stated that the lauguay, in the coattact dealing with the City's tight to terminate the lease it ducted had been improved. The lust could be terminated with a 6 month notice. 'r ) McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance, On toll call vote, Mc Adamt "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins may@,• Tr, Alford "aye," Riddlespargat "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye," Motion carried unanimously. G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance establishing a loading tons located at Ili Sycamote Street and providing tot a penstty in the u tlmu■ swouat of 1200.04 tot violations theeao . The tollawing ordinance was eensideeedt 6"+ NO. 16-256 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A I LOADING ZONE LOCATED AT Ili SYCAMORE ITREETI PROVIDING FOR A I PENALTY IN THE MKIMUM AMOUNT OF 1200.00 FOR VtOLATtONS t „ THE0E0F1 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. a` Rick Svehla, Assistant City Managet, stated that this woo a f standard ordinance tot A loading tone And providing tot a penalty tot people who packed there who wete.not authecised. was tot the road Bank and would be ne tee tot The loading iono, the i r 04 i. K , *41 'S t. v City of Denton City Council Minutes D-4ceabet 16, 1966 Page 6 McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On Coll Call Vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aYe.' Hopkins "aye," 1'd Alford "aye,"" Riddlaapsrget "aye." Chew "aye," and Mayot Stephens aye. Motion carried unanimously. H. ttem vas pulled by the Mayor at the start of the meeting. ' I. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing as agreemeat wit4 Camp. Dgeeser and MCKea relating to a feasibility study for watat/6wox fees, I ' The following ordinance was conaidered; NO. 86-26% AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OT DENTON AND CAMP, DRESSER AND MCIIEE FOR ENGINEERING SERViCES1 APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OT FUNDS THEREPORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' Bob Nelson, Dttectot of Utilities, stated that the study was dealing with the cost of new Customers On the water/smwet teas. The study would be divided into two distinct segments. The first was to analyze and do a feasibility study on the ! ' impact that new customers had oa the infrastructure. The f i second segmeat would be development of Cass is accordance with that impact. Y 4t, y~ Riddlospetgor motion, McAdams second to adept the ordinance. On toll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexandet "aye," Hopkins StapRenal"aye,"a Motionicalrried unanimously nw "aye," and Mayor P. S. Resolutions r' R. Item was pulled by the Mayof at the start of the stating. appeoving an agreementcibetveenidthe deity tot Dantom and othe iVL Roses of Texas Repeater Association tog emergency communications assistance. The following resolution was tonsidotedt t A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON 3 AM THE YL 108E8 OF TEXAS REPEATER ASSOCIATION FOR EMERGENCK ai COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANCE, AND PROvi01NG FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ROLVTHEREFORE. THE COUWCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY { ~yi x+ P RWS ,rt 'c BECTtON J.L r That the Mayor and City Secretary are hetaby authottsed and directed to execute and attest, uspactivaly, art agreement between the City of Denton and the YL Rosa Of Texas Repeater Association tot emergency assistance uader the totes Ana conditions being contained in said agreement which to attached hereto and made a part hereof. ~k .r ~ 1~ ti~~'.,t.~3~.ai,(»v;~,u , r:v . .a .,n .bv w c n-; ,u¢ . . is Imoy.. -r - r, City of Denton City Council Minutes December 16, 1946 i Page 7 t SECTION it, aA That this resolution shall become effective t' immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSLD AND APPROVED this the 16th day of December, t RAY BTEPHENB, MAYOR 3 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY Y~ CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS 117 '1PPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: CITYAOF AKI R,YOVITTCH. CITY ATTORNEY BY: ,pl Rick Svebla, Assistant City Managet, stated that the agreement S5'.' "-r would allow the group to use out radio lover with their equipment and formalized tbs requlatLons so that everyone i involved would know what the ragutattoas vote. McAdaas motion, Atezandet second to approve the resolution. On toll to I vote, McAdams ",ye,W Alexanaat Nay$,• Hopkins •ay4,n Altord °&y6,0 Liddlespetget •aye,4 Chew Mays,' and Mayor Stephens MaY4.0 Notion eatti6d unanimously. r ~ C. The Council considered adoption of a tHOlutton approve construction 81144 tot sit the highway traffic Signailftls. The following resolution was oon4ideted: ti a a 0 t, U T 1 0 N BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASt . 'n SECTION I. ~r That the attached agrNaent between the State of Total t, and the City of Denton tot the installation, ronsttuotion, 4xlsteac4, vas, op4ratioa, and uinteaan04 of certain highway traffic signals/itlualnattOn at the location(s) shown on Exhibit 1, attached heteto and made a part hareot, in the City of Denton, be and the same to netoby approved. That the City Manager is hereby suthOttlid to exeoate laid contract On behalf of the City Of Oeaten and to t96h42tt the 24114 to the State of Texas tot apptopriat4 lotion. eA 'I i i ray i q n { City of Denton city council minutes December 16, 1966 i{! Page 6 j SECTI01t llr. i f That this resolution shall become eftective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1966. j RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR CITY OM DENTON, TEXAS + ATTESTi CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 5+; APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORNI DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OY DENTON. TEXAS r ~ ''rte Sy t bk i , Rick Svehla, Aselstant city Manager, stated that this u s$ a µ4w formal approval allowing the City Manager to sign plant for an upgrading of the signal at U.S. 77 and Windsor, Hopkins motion, Aletsnder second to adopt the resolution. On roll Call vote, Massa gays," Aletandee wa e,w Hopkins w Alford ways." Riddlespeeger waye.s Cho Ywa and aye, Stephens waye.N Motion carried unanimously, Y Mayor ~j Item F. was moved ahead in the agenda. The Council Considered approval of a resolution authorielnq a Committee to aafist the public Utilities Boned 4 `„s the City Council in their consideration of capital zocovery +4"~ The toltowing resolution was cohsidereds ERa0LUT I OH NWMA6, the City Council has, upon the recommendation of the public Utility Board, allthotigod Camp, Deadest and Mcltee I to conduct a feasibility and iaplementstion study for the EI r = NtabtiahmeIL of capital resovery 160111 and NHEREAB, such study contemplates the appointment of I eititans committee to provide input and sea stance to the consultants and the City[ Now# THEREFORE, r. q t City of Denton city council Minutes December 16, 1966 Page 9 3 t BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OY DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. ` That the tollowing individuals ate neteby appointed to constttute the "Capital Recovery toms Citizens' Coamittw. . y' At Lace Representative City Counall Member E4 , Public Utilities Board Member 7 , Public Utilities Board Membet I Chambst/Soatd of Realtors Representative University Reptesentattve League of Women Voters Representative Home Owner 17; . Home Owner Retired Home Owner Engineering vita Representative k . Apartment Dvellet (possible student) Homebuilder Association Representative SECTION it. That is hereby appointed as the r{f ij chairman ot each Committee. SECTION Ill, That the Committee shall coordinate vith Ca■p, Dresser and McKee and the Public Utilities Board and shall report its r' findings to the Public Utilities Board. SECTION 1V. V That this resolution shall beccae etteetive iamedistely upoh its passage and approval, t PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986. RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS ` ATTEST t CIUIRLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED A$ TO LEGAL FORMS DMA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS RYt _ _ t Sob Nalson, Director of Utilities, stated that in conlunottoo with the aetviess eoatract with Camp, Meese, and Me sea the Public Utilities Based recoae:endad that A pinions committee be appointed to help guide/direst through the ptociae, The PUR gave consideration to a efoss eeotton of the public vhteh might serve let r.,•,♦ u w t<w'w.:r. ~yy,?,,.+,+e ,,,.,d . r.•<'-;r.:W i City of Denton City Council Minutes December 16, 1966 Page 10 on such a committee. The committee make-up would be 11 members: one member at-large: one Council Members two PUB membet a one member etas either the Chamber of Commerce of the board of Bealtocss one member from the Univecsitys one member b team the League of Masan Voteees three homeowners, an* catireds an eagineering tics tepresentatives an apartment dvelltr, student it possible: and a member teas the Homebuiidees Association. This was a suggestion as to the sake-up to the Council. Council Member McAdams stated that she noticed that a position had been left open tot someone from Texas wasam's University and wondered about having a reptesentative, from North Texas f State Univetsity. I r Council Xembet Hopkins asked it the number of cepcesentstivos could be increased another person at take away the j eepeteentative at-letge so that both Universities veto i represented, Nelson replied that both Universities veto represented otigihsliyy but that the balance of the membership as looked at by the PUB via that a Univetsity would have a different i potspectLyt than that of a homeowner and thus only one s university needed to be represented. Debts Dtayoviteh, City Attorneys asked it the Council Members had names submitted in their copy of the resolution. Mayor 8t•phens replied that the Council was only approving the concept vltb the names to be included with the recommendation by the PUB. ~a Nelson stated that the 1amee of the committee members would probably by submitted at the next council meeting. s' Mayor Stephens stated that the Council was acting just to estabtlin the committee. Duyovitch stated that the Council would not actually pass the resolution because the resolution names the appointees and at that teas there WCG no names. i, Lloyd Ha[Ce11/ City Manager, asked Iselson it the Board was A looking tot the Council to supply the names of the committee umbett. Nelson replied yes. 1441yot Stephens meted how the Council was going to appoint the ' committee members. Did the Council want to approach the various otganltatios and ask them tot a tecoomendstlon of r appoint the members tbemeelvee. .a' Consensus of the Council was that it there was An identifiable group the group would be approached tot 6 wetal 1411141 and the Couno;l would pick a member. The members would be Picked to r the following utnets the Council would pick the it-latgs member and the City Council seabee, the PUB already had pieked i i their members, the Chamber would be a0.ed tot a representative, council would pl%k the University member, League of Mossn's Voters would be s;locil Would at pick a the Council could choose from, the o the r" f the Hor bu;ldsts As detattqqea would ti emilked rtos ubmislt2 t0t I asset tot consideration, Council Member Chew asked it 'the number of representatives could be raised team 11 to ib to Include a homeovnes team each dlsttiot, , i City of Denton City Council Minutes December 16, 1986 Page 11 Mayot Stephens 691064 and stated that the other tepraaentacive Could cone from the other Vnlveralty to help balance that out. He also asked if any other group had been overlooked. He asked about a small businessman to be included in the committee. a Consensus was that the number of tepeeeentativas would be raised Eros 17 to 1S with the additional reptememtatives coming i (too a homeowner and a small businessman, 0. The Council considered approval of a resolution a. nominating the Mayoc tot appointment to a National League of cities committee. The tollowitg resolution was eoaaldetedt h' a a 8 0 L V T 1 0 H u + WHEREAS, the City at Denton, Texas, is a member city of the National League of Cities$ and WHEREAS, nominations tot National League of Cities committee memberships ate ptesontly being accepted by the Texas Municippal League for its recommendation to the National League of cltlssl And t WHEREAS, the City council wishes to nominate Mayor Ray y.`I 8tephens to a candidate tot membership to the National League of Cities Policy Committest and WHEREAS. Mayot Ray 8tephens, having held an elected 4., otttce for at least oho year and having privioualy served on Texas Municipal League's legislative pdiicy committles, meets T t the Texas Municipal League's quallticaticas tot recommendation As a Candidate for the Policy Committee of the National League r` ys of Cittest and nt WHEREAS, Mayor Stephens would be an able proponent in 61 coptosenting the interests and values of the Texas Municipal . Los us to conaidettag and a4dtassing tedacal and municipal poliey issues of a National League of Cities Policy committee i members NOW, THRRRPORE, ° RE IT RESOLVED RY THE COUNCIL Ot THE CITY OP DRUM, TExASI q ~ f 8RCT10N 1, 4 That Mayor Rey Stephens, having set all of the criteria tot recommendation by the Texas Municipal League fat s pointmaht to the Policy Committee of the National League of Cities, is hereby nominated as a candidate fot the Conittae. 1 4 8 ECT ItN1 I f . That the City 8ecretity to hereby directed to fotVatd a copy at this Resolution to the Texas Municipal League by ti omondatlona lfoecandidates too tits Poll y iCommittee omaking National League of Cities, SECTION Ill, That this resolution shall become eftedttvo immediately upon its passage and approval. e r~ {y5 ..n r~ r~e~ iC• .re. r:<,.a-+ . >a r+or,.:~..n am y.r 6. 0'ti 31k. .ed .'r.I er,: ye• ,en F Y City of Denton city council minutes Decetbot 16, 1986 Page 12 PASSED AND APPROVED this 1986 the 16tH day of December, , rT 9 ~ . • RAY STEPNENs, MAYOR ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS p E ATTESTt " CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED As TO LEGAL FORM: ` DEBRAOTDAMI DS,YOVtITTCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY DETON t{r-, RYt ' Alexander notion, McAdams second to adopt the resolution. oa toll call vote, MCAdsme may*" Alexander "aye," Hopkins "ay6," } Altotd `aye," Riddleeptcgel Kaye," Chev may*," and Mayor Y Stephear aye." Motion carried unanimously. H. The ameadiag a t6 olutionnadoptedaD*e~ beid1. 1915 relating to the a' e01ployt6nt of the City Attorney, 6~ The following teeoluttoa was considered: .J v' ; RESOLUT tQN WHEREAS, on December 2, 1915, the City Council adopted a t6eolutio telating to the Employment of Debra Adati Deayoviteh as City Attorney fat the City of Dentoni and WHEREAS, the City Council is d6strous of emending said Rsolution$ WOW, THRREtORR, 4 ' RE iT RESOLVED EY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TRXAS: p t i SEC4IOW t. StO 1915 is hereby amended to provide Ras follovstadopted Dacembec 1, c.1 "Diaybvltee,forAehietietvic6il An tannual bail 6eelaly eOf !55,900 payable in inetstlmente at the eam6 time is other etployees of the City eta paid end in Automobile x - allowance of $200 pet nonthl provided, hoveVet, the Council 66Y from time to time adJuet said olely after rr conducting the City Attorhey'a Annual pettormancs review's IECTtow try That this tarolution shall take offset JAnuaty 1, 1917. + r; , 0. 'C PPM~'1 r Y 1 4a • i a~,.ni a t. ...yya. r , city of Denton city council Minute } December 16, 1916 i Page 17 1916PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of December, . rat RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS ATTESTi p. , ~,•CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY f, CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS A APPROVED AS TO LEGAL rORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS f " BYt It , tt ' Riddlespetget motion, McAdams sorted to adopt the resolution. On toll call vote, MCAdsas "aye," A1Oxsadet "aye," Hopkins ' "aye," Alford "aye," Rlddlesperget "aye," chow •sya," and Mayor ttephena "aye., Notion carried unanimously. 6. The Ceuaeil coaaldered an approval of as amendaeat to the employment a9teeaent between the City of Denton and the city Mata;et Increasing annual compensation to 176,100 7J' etfecttvr January 1, 1917, Alexander motion, Hopkins sacond to approve the amendment. On " tall Calt vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander mays," hopkins "aye," Altotd "aye," Rlddtespetget "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye.■ Notion Cattied•unantmouely. 7. Mileallanacus matters team the City Manager. `w . Lloyd Hattell, City Managet, presented the following ttesst 14 The tetvice Awards Banquet tot City eaployade a, would be held on Januaty 11, 1917 from noon to 1100 p.m. In the silver eagle Suite at Nolth Total State vntvetaity. The Mayor would be making th openiaq temacks and Council Member Chow pteeating the Invocation, y t. A schedule of the EPA heatinga had been passed out with a spot lal note an the heat lag on Januaty 1 at Is00 a.m. In the Couadil Chamblee. @ t, ' 1. A memo tram Buddy Cole had been given out Indicating that Denton County would be asking in this $*Won of the legislature to have a charge In the totes tat law whtch would allow them to submit to the voters Of the County it they j d. desired, the ptoposittoa to tncteaso the falls tax by 1/10 and have a Coreeponding dsrfease in the ptOptoty tat. Cuetently Denton County was ptohibited from dotal this becaeee two cities within the County, Caetoilton and tlowtf Mound, Wage eatved by DART. Staff did not see any hats in amending the law in this teelset. Council Meabot Chow stated that he supported the County in this Watt, No opposition was failed by the Council, rf Colinas Member Rlddlesperget left the Nesting. F~ sr, 1 .,.,r 6.+,+...10. we..~; S IF 1! asessessm 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes December 16, 1916 Page 14 tfR S. Nov Business The following items voce presented as new bYSIUSIS: 1. Mayor Stephens Stated that a casolution was needed at the earliest possible foment appointing the moattocing r coswitttie, CtP 191. He also asked It the cooittes would fonltot the Match 145 Attest bond Issue. The Council rtitueaed to tui it to the sgendA eider. ` F: 1. The Council received a ptesentatton of the ,s Sesquicentennial Donton Book, Mt. Plank Davila and Me. Denise Spivey presented the li with a copy of the sesquicentennial Denton Book. The Mayor thanked Mt. Davila and NO. Spivey tot all the work that they had dohs. Mc. ii Davila, topCesentstive of the Denton sesquicentennial fi Coamittes• gave a beret Aufuty tepoet of the committee's . activities cueing the year. He also chankod all those who helped with thaw activities. He then presented the Council with the 64640:4ot8anlal Book and a few other elemental trot s, the Sesquicentennial. 2. The Coun Al etieelved bids tot the putchese of 1S00,000 City of Denton, T,,Xas Certificates of Obligation, td6u4 1917, Lloyd Rattail, city Managet, introduced Mr, Prank Medanich of First Southwest who reoalVed the bide. fr1 r.;I Medanich stated that he had tour bids and asked it Mt. Rattail had any in his possession. Hattell teplted no and asked Mt. John Mcoeana, Director of Pinaacs, if he possessed any bids. Neocene Copllsd no. ti Medanich opened the bids 86 tollow s (1) Data. Witter R6yaolds, e tea. with an effective interest rats of 1.112443. (2) first 1t+ southwest Company with An effective interest Cate of 7,14, (1) lausehet Pierce latdnts, Inc. with in at(sattVe lntatest Cate of 61 and (4) Rotan Moyle with sa W eetiw interest rate of 6.4776. ttem 043. was Consldsred fto/ the agenda critic. F~ 4. ocdlnaaees J. The Council Considered adoption, of ark otdinenc• allthatitirg the Issuance Of 11100,000 City of Denton, TeRas Cettifteatea of Obligation, tatted 1417 and ApPeoving and authotislag indttuments end pcacsdu us relating thereto. .a The following otdlnsni was pteesnted( rs NO. /6-256 i ,r DIDINAMCI; AUTHORUINO TUN 116UAMC1, SAM AND DUIV11Y Of CITY Of D1NTOM C1RT111CAT1S Of OBLtOATIOM, Hatts 1917, AMD APPROVIMO 00 AUTHORtsINO tUSTRUMINT6 AID PROCIDURII RgUittMd TH111TO a_ T960 Medanich stated that the bid trc■ lauschtie Plsrot Refsnes Ina. WAS the winning bid at 4,91011114 not effective lntateat rate and suggested that the Ctty areappt the bid, Mt, Paul Hlttoo alto tatted that the City thou id accept the bid and would pfici the City with all necessary ptperwotk. e r , r 1 .v s'1[x`°~:•.•.,. , . .r r.,.aia ru ..v ..e y:!.yax. r_s,ia q. r,,.av~... ~Y, ...x.. .r. yIA"Idk 1 x, t } City of Denton City Council Minutes i December 16, 1966 Page 1S vote, Mckdn assisecond moxandec Mite;*diHopkins Oft layc,' call Hopkins Altocd "aye", Chew "aye." and Mayor Stephens "aye." Notion _ accied unanimously. ` The Council reconvened into executive session oint>!n s ss legal matters, call a tote. personnel. and bated app The Council teo0nvened into Open 9461:00, Item +5D was considered. Resolutions D. ehNaYodat l execute eradLsau~ 1►9ceetteor between itbe the Regional Medical authorising kt center tatt the lease County Hospital. The following rea0luti0n was coasidetedt ~ u s a n 1. to T l 0_H 1MERtAB, the City of Dantoa through its City Council and the county at Denton thtough its Commisaiaaets court, have C'. given umlaut eonsidaeation to the ptesent tad tutv.ce health case needs of the tesidents of the camauniCY served by flow INaotlal Hospltalt and f MHBRRASa the City and the couqunty desire to assuca the j availability aitlansith Cat nq to Icovide such carateiaA~ats and the NOV r> MNERtA6. the City and the County have tegust+d a Slue Ribbon Coamittee to study the Hospital and its future: tad z ti NHER8A6, upon andet he atCothe phave LdatacalaedRlthat All t; Coaaitt66, the City sigalticaae ahangae at* ecru ury to assure the future viability of the Mospiu l: and Mri; wHtRRAt, the City and the County have detetata+d that cola ing into a Lease A9ceeaeat with the low Corporation to leave assets of flow H6emoci+l Noapital is in the best latecestoe of the tuidtats of the County of Denton and the City x~ Denton: and p NHtRtAS, entry into such Luse 1L99eaae°t Is contingent tlniltaon- ppioliLl~ydi°lacourt rstorytludozontsputiuiatdto T11. IRV. CIY,STAT.AMN art. 1170-2 Wet collie Bull. 19661 upholding the legality and validity of such Lease W46166ntt NOM, THRRtfDRt, i,a / 8t IT ORDAlygo DY THE COWCtL Of TH8 CITY Ot 09VTOMt P, ae~T That sub act to the °oatingen°iev set teeth above at cond willMayo&ar to h reby oautAO ilod me asescuto the LeastAA9ri6aent „ flow Womatial } between the City of Daatoa, the County at Denton, c4atat and tlow Regional Medical , Hospital Board of Diceetocs Hospi rt tot the leave at the asut$ of flow Memotial tal t to o Flow toral cent er. Aietto tndedic la pat here substantially the totm es attached clf. Rade Y That this resolution $ball be°oia 6tteative taatdiately upon its postage and approval. r. u , PA I I l4. i C City of Denton City Council xinut40 December 16, 19x1 Page 16 PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of December, 1916. CITYSOF DENTON. TEXAS • ATTESTt. CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA RDAMI LRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS a: Sy l Debra Dtayoviteh, City Attothey, Stated "as noted in the papet and as ptesented to the Council via the new corporation's attorney, the seveoth dealt of the Idaee document between the paetiea to this transaction still had levetal total that Veto unacceptable to the new corpoeatlon to the eateht that the City k rv°+ has been advised that the transaction would not go through unless the City and the County capitulated on these demands. r'F There has been some discutsions with aoabets of the new board, new eat potation and certain of the public officials and it we,11 Just go down the lease real quicklyp and talk about what it does. A primary purpose of the lease is to satisfy concerns expte4eld by the Attorney General's Office when a declatatoty judgment was tiled in accordance with the peovillons of the Resat Transfer Agreament. it the council will recall, out attorneys advised us La February that the most legal way to r handle this transaction Val a lease agteesent, hoWSV*t At that time it was not acceptable to cettaln of the other parti*$ and ten months later we find outeelveo here with a Rase. The y Uue is dratted so that it estimate sl such as possible the substltiv4 agtearents negotiated at by the ;part os over the course of tout months last aptinq. To that and it to a tottY-yeat 14406 that ptovidme tot a tatty-yest option that Viii alloy the new hospital to have access to capital to censttuet now impeoVements to insure the continued viabit; h• of k ? Flow. The 14446 now does contain provisions that allow new corporation the tLght to construct othat facilities in o.aion a County and ramovm anything that it mot affixed to the test ptepetty to such facilities as long as it i4 returned to the City and the county and the Trust by the end of the tells. The Course of negotiations With the Attorney GeneraIIS Ottiue also ~asF. revelled that tot tatty Yeats the trust has alto been An owner of the hospital and this has caummd certain *that tovitione to be made in the document to the extent that that trust does hold t title to Flow Mosoriat Hospital as a co-owner. The prdp0446 loosest and Flow did demand that the City and county delete d lease obligations to Carty Malpractice insurance and •ertein other liability insurance in order to ptotset the cots„ration and the City and County. Today tL494 Val a Comptomlst reached } by the patties that will provide that flow shall catty Maiptactice insurance and liability insurance and other types } of Insurance ndtmally regsited tot an operation such so a hospital in amount$ that ace ts40onably and Custom40ilY carded by other hospitals of comparable miss ehd providing comparable services. Thirdly, the lessees had demanded that the City and the County and the Trust could not tataiMte the 16640 even when flow was in datault of the Lease provisions unless that$ were certain coacesttoas made with respect to any debt itsu4d w;r by the latest. The attefnaya tot the City and the Couuty in response to this concern and because they ttuly dosild and ate i. j :..a i .r„-tie...>, ...y .R? w.. w,.. " 4 i l I 2 E.I. l" City of Denton City Council Minutes December 16, 1966 Pape 17 ,r desirous met this transaction being ons that will allow the j hospital to obtain financing so that it may continue to be a viable institutton, have dratted language to protect the eights of a lender and to that and it would allow the lender to come in and operate the hospital it there was a default by Flow on the terms at any indebtedness that will be issued in the art future. The lease was dratted to provide that the hospital j would have the eight to sublease pottloas of the existing Flow y' property for medical offices, a flavor shop, gitt shop, tF Ihataacy, launder. and other activities which Flow detarminot ■re supportive of and ors not to competition with Flow. The { parties have agreed to allow the hospital to sublease the entice facility without the prior written consent of the City, w. the County and the Trust so long as it is tot these purposes, j and the present document reflects that. There has also been discussion and negotiations with the tequltement in the lease that a de:totatoty yudgment be obtained prior to tir.aliming transfer of the property from the City and the County ao9 the Trust to the new cotpotatton. All patties have rgcaed, at best we know, that the declaratory judgment is a necessary proceeding in order to protect the tights of the City and the County and most especially the Trust and to assure that this notion that's being taken by the City and the County and the Trust meets all legal tequicaments. The corporation is 5'• cogatxant of the assay and ham agreed that that tequireseat " stay within the lease. The coeparetton bit also made s demand ai that IS67.000 be paid by the City and County prior to closing. { The patties have agreed and the County Comalsitoners ye.tetday, j and the City Council, I think, and it I've atestatel, please advise, that this issue to a separate distinct issue from the 'lease peovlstons and should not be included In the leaso. Representatives at the now cotporation have agreed that that is A separate issue and should not be considered as pact at the i. adoption of the lease. The lessees were desirous of deleting the language that provtdas in aecotdahca With WWI Bill 1. that price to cueing to provide any of the services currently provided by Flow, that the consent of the losects be obtained and the consent cannot unteasonable withheld. In the event that Flow dotscainee that thu City and County or the Trust ace being uateasonab U, the leaam provides tot arbitration, the results ,e which will be binding upon the patties. This language is 9 designed to aid the County and the City in cospltaace with the statutory tequicaments and yet to provide as such maximum protection to the hospital as necessary because of the changing s, technology of the health toes industry, which indeed is reflected in the lease documents. Finally, the patties have agreed to abate any obitgattna of the cocpotatlon to pay cant In the event of damage at destruction or forced seat its. It to my undessteading, and we'll go through the tease real quickly, that a motion to approve the least, it *no to made, will include language to instruct the City's attorneys to draft language that makes that not as open-ended abatement at cent with a 90-day limitation and such extensions as may bi b4ce6161y In order to comply to the peovisione of the lease. i think that covets about all the substantive issuer before the Council with respect to this lease. This loses was entered into and Indeed in the spirit evidenced by the Blue Ribbon Comatttes in their many sonths of deliberation and concern into tnruting the continued viability of flow Meeotial Hospital and the lasso incorporates those ideals. I'll be pleased to j respond to any questions." f Council Member Alexander asked it a motion would be in order at this point. Mayor ttaphens tafli•,d yes. Alexander gotten, McAdams second that the teselutlon be adopted with the conditions desocibod by the Ctty kttotaey, Oa tell rail vote, McAdams. "aye," Alexander mays," Nopkinr "aye.' S Attoed "lye," Rlddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," end Mayer ' Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. k r, Cal : i , y, S City of Deaton City Council Minutes December 16, Is66 i Page is 1113 1 Council Member McAdams stated: •1 Would Just observe that the " Council has bent over backwards in an attempt to negotiate a f" lease that Ls fair and ace that protects an asset that is owned by the citizens to that In the event of whatever to the future, that that asset would not have been simply squandered me it is, as we hold It in public trust and I tbdnk we have an obligation to cry to instre that tha citizens get the benefit of that j facility, ■nd that's what waive tried to do in this ordinance. You know 1 thick the Counoll as a whole certainly believes very 1I strongly in the need tar a public hospital In Denton county and that's what we have endeavored to provide for. ' Council Member Alexander stated 1114 ' I think it's important that the Just like comment that County realize that this has been eaDU of Demean and Deaton process that has bees a +r= toaq and difficult one, but that the City and nd the County, in my J this uaYment and particularly since I have been associated with Countyr have worked very laconstructively months. City try the achieve the desired end. And I %titak It's important that 4 V, people understand that rues hat b•ea an essential agreement r between the City arl Coua,y now for several months and that w pK. ace now to the process of bringing this thing to conclusion and l point to be ac that 1.0 very pleased, but 4 do think that's an Important entitles had been • that the political process between the two % positive and that's it worked rather wall in the process. r, Mayor Stephens stated : shell this have been a, truly a sp[cit of cooperation between the City and the County as joint owners h of the Lospital. In seeking to find some means tot this faciltty to temaia a oosmunity-based hospital. There's been a but I motive, there's been a guide and because of that I think that a. we have bent over backwards to attempt to achieve some wotkiaq agreement with the new bard and so we've said before and a certainly it is still true, because no one knows just what the outcome of this is going to be, it's a leap of faith. we just hope to much that it will work out because we want so desperately to have a visDle eoaauniiy-based health cat* facility in Denton County, that wait* willing to take this chance. We're assured that without this action, Flow Hospital ' would not exist as it currently dots, to taking that on good £ word of those who gave it, then we hope this will east that k particular problem 40d Flow remain alive and healthy in the { y. Yt, CouneLiman McAdams stated: +L Just night add that x think that F r i it's Important tot the public to understand that this is not the first lease of a public hospital of this natu a and that there are leases that are tar more ustcictive than the one that we, et %t the County and the City has agreed to here, so that, that n have not In an Way. I think, tied hands, we have Jounc:ir endeavored to provida lease that provides some ptotertion, while At the seat time affording a based the fceedos to operate well and cettainly this Board has a lot Sore a•, freedom in Its Lease than does a couple of other hospitals that are currently operating as doing quite wail with their lease agreements. j Mayor Stephens stateds "1 was just so pleased that the Denton ~k County C000:6010n6 N' Court and the Dsntdn City Council have " been in close working attangemant and agteeaent for the last coupla of react on this cutter and I think that that's a SAJat L',•. step, Once We get this beh W us, let's sae what other Joint antetpeises we can approach and conquer, Couacilun Chew stated that he wanted to mention that Mr. Riddlaporger was absent and tint he was auto that he would applaud this oppottusLty to vote tot the hospital, hale worked so diligently on that. M J y ~3'.' " , City of Denton City Council ll n::tes Deceaber 16, 1916 Page 19 Council Member Rlexandar stated that he was going to comment along the lase tines and appreciated Councilman Chw raking the Comment, but that woe important that Ji■ be recognited as having played an active roll in this process Cron the beginning and knew he would have liked to have been here to cast this j vote. i E. The Council considered approval of a resolution establishing eligibility standards pursuant to the lease R agreement between the city. County, and Ftov Regional Medical Center. y The following resolution was considered: R E S O L U. T 1 0 N WHEREAS, the Lease Agfeement among flow Regional Medical Crater, the County of Denton. Texas, the city of Denton, Texas and the Board of Directors of Plow 1Nmoeial 3i Hospital requ.res the County of Denton and the City of Denton to advise the Nov Corporation of the initial eligibility standards to be utilised in determining the Value of satvlees to be provided to indigent patients; and WHEREAS, Article 44311, VornaaIa Annotated Texas Statutes, the Indigent Health Care and Treatment fret, deflate " the responsibility of counties to provide health care services to lndigeat residents: and 1 WHEREAS, said Article 44361. V,R.T.S., also determines the pecoons who are eligible fat health care assistance; NOW, '.y THEREFORE, 7 { BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP DEWTOM. TEXAS: JECTIOM 1. i That the City Council pursuant to the aforementioned i Lease Agteement, hereby advise that the initial eligibility ) acaadards to be utilised in determining the value of services to be provided to ladigent patients ate: 1) The standards established by the Texas Department of y ` Human letviess (DHS) pursuant to Section 1,06 of the Indigent Health Coca and Treatment Act, Reticle 441St, V.A.?.$., an such eligibility standards say be changed z from time to time. Theta standards ate available team DHS or the county Auditor: 2) EXCEPT that residents who were eligible tot assistance from TIOV Memorial Hospital during the fiscal year siding f September 30, 1944 $hall be eligible tot astiotaoce if r 'r they continue to root the eligibility standards that were in effect during the fiscal 1914, the Hill-urtoh categoryyA standards stott1404,1as attached. f 'rk section it. That the City Secretary it hereby directed to forward a copy ant of this Retoiution to Mike Whitten, Pessidont of Flow Regional icodical Center Board of Directore. J( fir b r~ r _,.xr:5r :rem ~ _ n g c ,a City of Denton City Council Minutes December 16, 1966 Page 20 9lSS.19_n ttl. } That the Resolution shall take effect and be in full t0r0e inmediatelY uPon It$ Passage and approval. a PASSED AND APPROVED THts THE day Of 1966. S' 'r RAY STEPHEN, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS e_ e . 1 ATTEST: w ' CHARLOTTE ALLEN. CITY SECRETARY ~F CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS t' hPPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM! DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHa CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS BY: Debra btayovitch, city Attorney, stated: one of the provisions in the asset traaafar agreement considered by the parties last spring and accordingly carried over into the laces agreement ptovides that the County and the City adopt as of ~3 ! eligibility standards operating fog the hospital a part j the consideration fog the lease. The catolution that adopts ! standards is set forth in your packet. It to identical to the r voeding in that sate document passed by the Commissioners In October, except to the degree that it retlects a 1e664 agreement as opposed to asset transfer. It provides that oy standards will be as set by the indigent beslth cat* and treatment act, except tot those people that were eligibla trr ' 4'y; a yl setvinss ttom flow in 1984, shall be eligible tot assistance, r It they continue to meet the atN aligibility standards that wets in operation in 1981. 1011 be pleased to respond to any questions. f ` J. - '~,•r chew motion, Altoed second to adopt the resolution. On call ~ call vote, McAdams ■sye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye," • Altord 'aye,' Chew ".ye.' and Mayor Stephens "aya." Motion ti retried unanleouely. L` r;M Lloyd Martell, City Manage! •mt. Kayor, Members of the Council, I think as most of you ate aware, sines verve talked about this sutjoct from time to tine In the past few week, the t' Cityy did receive a communication from the hospital Adainistratot asking us to make up the hospital do licit tot the month at October to the amount of between $260-2110,000, That r request was given to the city in my understanding, from one talk with the hospital a4miaistcetot a similar totter vas seat to the County. The thought bring that between the two entities, that that pattleulat deficit Mculd be covered. to addition to that, following the receipt of the letters the 'nT Finance W tsetot and 1 did %set with the hospital Administrator and during that contetence, it wee indicated to us that a deficit, would also be ezpetienced tot the month at November and possible end quite 1lk6ly one for December at well and that I i -3r ~ city of Denton city council Minutes .k December 16, 1966 Page 21 similar requests could be anticipated. And in tact pact of this Is now cetlected In some of the demands made regarding the lease agreement which the city Attorney has referred to previously. The City Council has discussed this Iran from time to time and a raaponsa vas made to the hospital administrator after contorting with the Council which basically, respectfully declined that particular overture on the part of the hospital at this time. Quite frankly because of some very seriously E financial problems which the City is experiencing right now and those were outlined as the Council is aware, first being a shortfall that alto already seeing unfortunately in our sales tax revenue for this fiscal year, where after two payments so j tat, we're already down about 1100,000 team where our budget anticipates we should be and that's something of very serious i concern to us and something that Votes monitoring very, very ! x carefully. And quite frankly it that situation doesn't turn around In the next month of so vith sales tax receipts, w'ce 3 going to have to take some proactive stances to try to sake a' sure that we coma out of that budget problem. In addition to k that males tax shortfall, the City, unfortunately, also has f tone real financial liability regardiaq the proposed County rollback election. And it that rollback election does succeed, and in tact, the County proceeds with budget reductions along the lines that have been publicized, we will be hit very deastlcally in the metal of emergency medical services, out ° library, and to a lessee degree in the area of civil defense and a small degree In the area of animal control. All of that uncertainty also clouds the city's fiscal picture at this point in time and I think world uke it highly irresponsible for ue 7 i to sake major allocatioas of unbudgated funds. The final thing i that we've mentioned, quite frankly, was still the uncertainty, l as the Council to aware, regarding this whole sees of indigent r health care. The City has not budgeted funds tot that obligation, pet your ditectton, and I think everyone acknowledges that that still is a debatable point and the City, in fact, may, at sons point in time, have an obligation, 0 although certainly it to out position now. Council hat to stated that you have none. But ft's an uncertainty out theta. " So because of those three reasons, we pointed out with your direction, that we just simply could not respond positively to a, that particular request. We did in the latter sent to the hospital &detailtestae note that there was outstanding indebtedness tot the hospital in the amount of approximately 1600.000. The hospital administrator had indicated that they w u holding aside about that amount of money to try to pay off ' that bonded indebtedness at the rise that this lease document became aftectivt and the not-tor-profit came into existence and started the actual operation. The City, per your guidance, Indicated to the hospital, that as tat as this body was t concetatd, you would be willing to just tat them make a pledge h to let them continue principal and interest payment on those 1 a outstanding bonds, tether than coming up right of way with the entire 1100,000. Which Was an alternative I thick eased their i } - cash flow problems, while at the same time, not obligating us i to funds to which realty do not took like they're theca unless Of "I wee willing to take some fairly dtsetle action such as laying oaf Some personnel and so forth. 1o that in summety Kt. Mayor, ~a Kesbers of the Council, vas the letter that has boon seat to ;F the hospital, pet your direction, and I think what we wanted to do was just suemactte that latter, the rationale for it, and make sure that that did get on the record as the position taken by this Council at this point. Kayos Stephanes •I think it's been a tong standing peoblea, bookkeeping at vlow, the collection Of bad debts and the writing them Ott by what Iiddlesperger calls a sick tax. And obviously that is Improper management *ad mutt atop and we hope that it will and than I think that't part of the cause of the 0 Shortfalls that tbey'va expetienced.m i s c 4FI"A^'.aYF k e., r City of Denton City Council Ktautee December 16, 1966 Page 22 e. ' Couneilsiaa Kehdams; "Moll I Would lust point out that I think that's it's important !or the e!t tens to knout that We aee certainly sympathetic with the hospital. We cannot afford to y I take say a halt million dollars of soee that w doe's have and bankrupt the City in trying to salvage that operation. The ' coneyy just simply is not hare, unless We sharply cattail services being ptesently ptovidsd by the city to 1ti citttsns, 1 and I think that Would certainly be breaking faith With them. it's much like a budget at boss. When the money isn't thee, it e lust simply is not tEeee and we don't have it, Without a substantial tax inctease tot the citiseos. Me won't have that kind of money to provide to YloW Hospital.` _ Kayoc Stephens* "0c as the manager said, substituting frog ' samevhece else within the current coins of the budget." Councilman Kehdams: "but that would mean curtailing. significantly eurtailing services that we already provide." With no lutthsc business, the meeting Was adloucned. l 4{ lp 1 :,4 i i F. ' 9 I~ r Is +r ' ~ a Sid 7R r r'i 1761a k 1 M ~4} 1 F 1 Z 11 1 rr f DATE: 01120/87 t CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT E i TO: Mayor and Members of the City COLLnai1 FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager i a SUBjKCT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR 2-1847 f C, v RRCOMF~NDATION: Planning and zoning Commission recom:uands approval. r The properly is located in a low intensity area. The planned development, it approved, would permit the development of a medical office in the existing structure. BACKGROUND: The low intensity area is over the standard but the existing Haiti-family (KP-1) coning would generate more traffic (intensity) than a 1,720 square toot medical office. F„ $ PROM DSPARTMKWTS OR GROUPS APP6CTtD: " All departments are involved in the development process. r r. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact can be determined at this time. Respite ly submitteds ~a ff c~ KJ; prepared by% Cit or ou. Cecile Carson Urban Planner t o ' y" APP ed: Jett r 4-. Motor i „ _ and teveiopmant 1760► a. r E i { e RNr v.L, m 'l 14 t i 1674L j. NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAY OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SANE WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, - AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID 14AP APPLIES TO .209 ACRES OF LAND 5 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SCRIPTURE AND FRY STREETS, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM MULTI-FAMILY (MF-1) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A P, ' PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. { WHEREAS, Bal-Moody Investments has applied for a change in 7 zoning from multi-family (MF-1) to planned development (PD) for .209 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Scripture and Fry Streets; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Article it of Appendix B-toning of the Code of Ordinances, the applicant has submitted for approval a detailed plan for the proposed district; and, WHEREAS, on December 17, 19860 the Planning and Zoning ak Commission' held a public hearing on the application and recommended approval thereof; and, A WHEREAS, on January 20, 1987, the City Council held a public 34, AC hearing on the application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the zoning classification and use designation of .109 acres of real property, described in Exhibit "A'", attached here- to and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby changed from Multi-family 'IMF-111 District Classification and Use designation r¢ " to Planned Development "Pr'" District Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. t s SECTION I.I. That there is approved for the district hereby established the "Detailed Plan", labeled as Exhibit 1181; attached hereto and { incorporated by reference; so that hereafter the district shall 3 Z-1847/PAGE 1 a tI . f FN 4, . be used and developed in accordance with the Detailed Plan r herein approved and the following additional conditions and restrictions: a, The district shall be used only for medical offices. w: . b. A six foot wood fence shall be erected along the southern and eastern boundaries of the district prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building therein. SECTION 111. `M The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the i 14th day of January, 19690 as an Appendix to the Code of r Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under ordinance No. 69-1, as amended, is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications, SECTION IV. t, That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive r plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to `fY conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION V. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, W r or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is it committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such ka'•:?, violations such persons shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION V1. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) a F days from the date of its passage, and the city Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be s , ti ` Z•1847/PAGE 2 ~A S ' Y. i1F1RK''1'.I M.'R..S v. .'tl~arF _ a _r 4cnr ~ .,w. . py J r T ° frl published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of s~ the date of its passage. @'• PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of lgg7. ' z 1 - 'j' E N , N CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPR ll OVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Et;RA'ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY M CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS 1u q yp'~ 1 'M 9 H 1 2-1847/PAGP 3 .l. IA- i PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1847 F Meeting Date: January 20, 1987 y. GENERAL INFORMATION a~ Applicant: eal-Moody Investments 2289 Scripture Denton, Texas 76201 t Status of Applicant: Owner p Requested Action: ,i Request a change in zoning from multi-family (MF-1) to planned development (PD) and approval of a detailed plan. If approved, the ` planned development will allow medical office use in a 1,720 square ri foot structure. Location and Size .209 acre tract is located at •a southeast corner of Scripture and Fry Streets Surrounding Land Use LJ and Zoning: North - Office, Flow Hospital S outh - Multi-family 10 residential East Multfamil i ll residential W est - Multi-family 1, residential Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area k~ SPECIAL INFORMATION transportation: Perimeter street paving will be required on Scripture Street. Driveway of parking lot aligns with Hospital driveway, A sidewalk will be located along Scripture Street. Utilities: An existing 40 water line on Ocriptur ~y and Fry Streets flow and capacityrovides adequate fire r M 1 I f` F I I (Case Z-1847) 4 Page Two ' SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Utilities (Continued): An existing S" sanitary sewer on E ( Scripture Street has adequate y" capacity. A sanitary sewer will be s. constructed in Fry Street under the 1986 Capital Improvement Plan. W Drainage: Drainage should be directed toward rfi Scripture Street. JJ~ ANALYSIS X~. The property is located in a low intensity area presently over the intensity standard based on zoning and existing land use. I The intensity area includes a mixture of land uses, ranging from single family (SF-7) to commercial. The proposed office use f based on 15 trips per 1,000 square feet of floor area would produce less traffic than multi-family land use. The request ~ violates the concentration policy for office use because the adjacent property. to the north is zoned office. Flow Hospital is located on approximately 14 acres of property zoned office located north of Scripture Street between Ponder and Bryan Streets. In intensity areas where the ecandard has been violated, the stiff reviews a zoning change to determine the least intense, most logical land use. The proposed office use would generate lese, traffic than the multi-family. The existing multi-family ary" zonin (Mtn-1) would allow the destruction of the existing house, while the planned development zoning for a medical office will insure the existing structure is preserved. The planned devel- opment is compatible with the surrounding zonings and provides protection to the residential area since the structure will remain intact, ti The request meets all requirements of the planned development ordinance. RECOMM3NDATION % The Planning and Zoning Commission recoolimends approval of 2-1847 <4 with the following conditions:. (by a vote of 6-0) 1. The existing structure shall be renovated for medical office use. ' 2. A six foot wood fence shall be erected along the southern and eastern boundary of the property prior issuance of certificate of occupancy, r w i , ~i' 4 F (Case z-1847) Page Three 4 ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition x- 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition t~ sx' ATTACRMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Detailed Plan 3. Development Standards 4. Architect's Site Plan 140" 5. Elevation sue" 64 Mailing List 7, Reply Form Totals 8. Minutes of the December 17, 1986 Planning and zoning Commission meeting } 6 A " f f r t l 17178 C " t ~ a' t EXHIBIT "A" COLEMAN S. ASSOC. SURVEYING x 417 S. LOCUST, SUITE 106 • P.O. BOX 888 • DENTON, TEXAS 76202-0686 (817) 565-8215 FIELD'NOTES to all that certain tract of land situated in the E.. Puchalski i ` Survey Abstract Number 996 in the city of Dehton, Denton County, Texas and f being all of the North half of Lot 10 of the W,.. A.. Ponder Addition as de- scribed in the Deed from James Blanton to Jay Dalentine and Robert Moody, c ' Jrr recorded in Volume 1958 PaRe 728 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas and that portion of a 20 foot alley along the East line of R, the said lot closed by a resolution from the City of Denton recorded in Vol- ume 434 Page 362 of the said Deed Records, as recognized and occupied on the ground) the subject tract being more particularly described as followsi BECItv'no for the Northwest Corner of the tract being described herein at a chisled "X" found in a'concrete walk at the Northwest Corner of the said j Lot 10} TI}ENCE South 87 Degrees U Minutes 17 Seconds East with the North line of the said Lot 10 at 171~99 feet passinb an iron rod found at the Northeast Corner thereof and continuing along said course entering said alley, in ail, a total distance of 181.99 feet to a point in the center of the said alley for the Northeast Corner of the herein described tracts THENCE South 02 DeRraes 49 Minutes 13 Seconds West with the center of the said alley a distance of 50.-00 feet to a point for the Southeast Corner of the here- in described tract} } THENCE North 87 Degrees 10 Minutes 11 Seconds West at 10 feet passing the South- saet Corner of the said Balentine-Mocdy. Tract and continuing'alanit said course, in a11i a total distance of 182,00 feet to a found chisled "X" in a concrete w. curb at thsiSouthuest Corner of'.the said tract: Tit8KC8 North 02 Dexrses SO Minutes 13 Seconds East with the West line of the said Lot 10 and the East line of Fry Street a distance of 50,.:00 feet to the PLACE OF BECTNNINO and enclosing 04204 of an acre of land,.. ' j These Field Notes were Prepared from a survey made on the Around, under my direction and supervision in November, 1986,., IS 4;S6 M chaal Z Yern R..P.S. No-., 4158 Date _ r a S~'•O F ~TF~' p MIC4~AEL J. KERN ~ 4158 iQ a . AGE</~lS UA~~yo 1 _.A Y F~ t E 3? EXHIBIT ;.l DETAILED PLAN FOR 424 FRY STREST; cONSISTING OF: 1J 1. Detailed Site Plan page)i 2. Development Standards and Development t Schedule (1 page)i t 3. General Notes (1 page); 4. Site Plan (i page)) and 5. West >levation (1 page). t , I 'W j, f " i r t 1 t `p VIA tV ...~xSy'..fy,.M, #.A~!liY:;f.n. w .ry...•..,hn sew.«....... wea.a+`..nr II, WWI I 1 } 6L 4"Ni PA lSNki! /AA! rP !SANE T 4 4~+tiy9 i l Too i AV l ® L AVE. 1. 'A =lF] y ] LAV A Q - A ~AOO! It MALONE n _ l V IN MA euz AVL A e~AVl.A ♦ LA K FualF 1L 14 ~I ❑T • Fc-oit Es, I [NO U❑o u ® DUI k ~ ~ ~ IOLIVAR Ll❑ F1 2L❑ ~ry do ❑ aa❑❑c V.T®n®~~' 0 ME= cl 11 I '.p 4 u AV 1,:aa+"°v I! I ❑ A Ana ~1.~~~~ . I I I i +I' i lr,ry -,w X1!1 .~7 q r l l' A it l ♦ 1 1 .r r+mlrp ~ ► i J - , -,er :.;r.Y N - vw~r4fi( Msl' ~ r rw~l way ~ ~ v1A , ~ LOp,,, ..~~if ~►VN ` Iy ~ aweN .was+~r I 1~ r r 1 y~ L a+r0 , O .I 1r~ r~Mr~ +~'iselrYotew.r l.~t'•~j . ~ te1 ~ r ' 9iP1 p.{ Mew. t II+ rfMMuTM Is+ylnw I ~ Cr.tT.+ w r.wo w.w t .a.r.a iss,ev,.. 1r.q 1.er1 OC xoml ~Y#'4 ai l ~rLr.V ION 1 1 Mk^~rl fMPe•1 lMY.W rY►M ~4 1,,t1~FN M. Wv PO fo..mp!ll1iJ'l'7 ~ f. 1144 /,pJ1," q prWfly It Y re~4e~r~v.1. p.,rr"V N p+~ I~~ 1~- 1 W rirq r MLY Ylv N t4 W, W 1r }r,t,t r~yllr W ~r ~,O Qr Z1Gl~ r ~ ` rrreW. L ► rYl ,kolr k ITlr4l1 W MV+fDVHE/•i •.~,./.~~,j, !r"ol "rM u,W MW rswrw rrJ."t l"Wo poll".. Yat•VPwvt ~1~. ~'t'1 r~'^IC kut j•7~ !1Gp 1 L 71t /rlr k'r,l. /YM lNW W IlY err Y 4 1w.lt rNy. 06.1 L erpq W li ep Y,U W Wltl.l I r tat IW IM r Nllrp IN rr N..U tl Frtulrr,. ' - r. ik Art}uq Wf14 rrer"1.. Y 1.U 11 . >r Ylp Ir 4J. A\Ta L er'lelr u w,.l,y W ~"YNN IrC". lr k lrr nW.uAll 4k1rr"WWrtw BURKE . ENQ0 k. 1y, /I• I r ! r. L 41AArp u Fgn,l. MM/Ib film ft"'K 11/!. M.'YI "l4Ner .(irL r4r. J. 0~II9ULTN10~ U. fL,r pNr to at rdup"t' fr IW I" WnrOw tolrtl4 5 `r" .^.elrlly. rr..u. r ,r,Wq rprt. r krrwWy Mr k 01 rNI 11 CC C.!Y.r"_nfj~r'o 4A IPA 15 , DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 424 PRY STREET DENTX, DEMON CCUM, TEAS S'TA73"M Of niow I My intentions are to refurbish the existing structure including major renovations to the inside for some type of medical use. Adding a parking lot to the rears luxury landscaping and sprinkler system and to preserve treea.• , existing Alec, my intent is not to sell said property once project is completed. I pould like to keep the property for an income producing investment. i J P A dwslopUnt, ragardUss of whet type, should create a sense of 'com~muvity" that identifies with the existing aursounding neighborhood. I strongly ri feel this development meta that criteria. Listed below are several pertinent ress" t ° s' 1 Refurbish existing structure to original state. ` 2. Revitalizing An old neighbor constructon. hood without the disruption of new 3: Close pe+osimity to lriov Memorial Hospital (Currently zoned "office"). 4. Aelationehip between medical services and major hospital. , „ Upon receiving sorting approval, said property will be completely renovated in three to hour months. 9 } } fn 1 1 ~ L 5 ti r . j r a s General Notest 1. Fry St. has concrete curb & gutter, but Scripture does not, 2. The purpose of replotting is to accommodate the separate ownership of { the North and South halves of the lot, and to permit remodeling and con- struction. I t 3. No major changes in topography are proposed. 4 d 4. A zoning change is also being requested in conjunction with this replat. k The Denton Development Guide indicates this area to be lov-intensity. 6., The proposed use is to convert the existing house on Lot 103 into an office for lease to medical practitioners. 7. The projected traffic generation is 1.7 x 15 - 26 trips per.dar. 8. ' The access to the parking lot will be from Scripture Street, only, for vehicular traffic. A new sidewalk will be constructed to Fry St, j "V 9: No open-space is proposed. i 10. All utilities are in place. r 11. Please refer to the architects' Site Plan for information regarding landscaping, sidewalk, and screening fence. No free-standing sign. is proposed. ra z 1 V • i j 1 PROPOSED SITE 3AYD4+-N11N6•owNS'A Hf1U SCRIPTLM STREET i . • J v NEW CONC. WALKS • ..,PROPOSED -PC"i*D-0EVELOAMAN1! ; PARKING . ' .619TINO MF-f ' 'CAMP' ` r 6' PRIVACY FENCE ` LA' PN II~1 ' ~+olf'dR t yf rr • WEST ELEVATION t~T3 r l t . y PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS I CITY COUNCIL 2-1847 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Tom Jester, Jr. Winifred Earnhart P.O. Box 280 405 Fry St. ~ Denton, TX Denton, TX Homer B. Bly 2108 Hollyhill Denton, TX yl ? w. P N 4 i f t ! :r p K v +5r i s ra, { r f ~*y!r l,. lf~'7~MJd ~a>,r .n..,._... ..y',.WU aA.Sankl•4at.l'vn.e l... .u♦..u,a.., w. ...*.:u ...,w e~... ~,.v.+ur<ww.".w..arww+.. V J( r 4 7 i j a~ 14 1AA ,xyY,or, 7lo.,i~ G a M o r~ ,f 4 3 F I . yy ~ 1 rl I v. sY Y 1 z ra / , PO - 2. ubpel - n-44-400 3 lt] i . r, .a ,.mot. • i a 7 - /~y7 { k 1 • if t /{d 4~ x a ff o h u ~ A l1 A r~ i tL r ' Y ~f . r5 X 3 v'.K d F n` x gr. P 8 2 Minutes December 17, 1986 Page I Mr. Claiborne asked if the land was donated. Ms. Evans stated that the land was purchased by the city and $12,000 was donated for the construction of the recreation center. DECISION: Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the prellR- nory pp,at of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Addition, Lot 1, f Block j !At by Ms. Cole and motion unanimously carried 5 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A•r ?47 Petition of BaF-Moody Investments requesting a ge in toning from ■ultf•family (MF-1) to planned development (PD) and appproval of a detailed pion on a 0.209 acre tract locsted at the southeast corner of Scripture and Fry streets and shown In the E. Puchalsk! Survey, Abstract 996. If a proved, the planned develop. ' Rent will allow medical office land use. Fifteen notices were milled to property owners within 200 feet; three reply forms were received 1n favor; no reply forms were received in opposition. PETIT20NER: J'SK Bolentine, Bal-Moody investments, state, t at a ter purchasing the property they studied the market and they le It there was a need for additional medical of- fices in this area. He said that they are renovating the existing surrounding neighborhood~itecturally compatible with IN FAVORr Richard Harris, 42S Fry, stated that he Is in ' favor o the proposal because it would renovate a strut. tore, clean up the area, ai.d retain the property. He added that he has restored h1s house across the street. Ns. Brock asked about the use on his property. Mr. Harris stated that i as residential. Ms. Brock asked if the property was Boned multi-family. Mr. Harris said yes. OPPOSED: None present. E` STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the property Is to- n a ow intensity area presently over the intensity standard based on toning and existing land use. The Inten- sity area includes a mixture of land uses, ranging from single family (SF-7) to commercial. The proposed office use based on 1S trips per 1,000 square feet of floor area would produce less traffit than a ■ulti•famlly land use. She said that the request violates the concentration policy for office use because flow HoapItal is on approximately 14 acres of property zoned office located north of Scripture Street between Poi..er and Bryan streets. The existing ar„ multi-family toning (NF•I) would allow the destruction of the existing house, while the planned development toning for a medical office will Insure the existing structure is preserved. The planned development is compatible with the tieloarts sincelthe StructureewilloremainnIntact E rShe dsold that staff recommends approval of 2.1147 with conditions, a Mr. mammon asked how for the street would be pared. Ms, Carson statee that the street will be paved across ' the length of the lot with curb and gutter and a culvert linstalled in the driveway. Ms. Brock asked if renovation was underway Ms. Carson said yes and if not approved they can continue to renovate or destroy the structure and bulld a new structure. . REBUTTALc None offered. i A+&1X'n.i'.1 .Xm.M :I NA Fgrr. i P 6 2 Minutes December 11, 1986 Page 3 Chair declared the public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Glasscock Roved to recomeend approval of 3 Z- O-vith the following conditions: 1. The existing structure shall be renovated for medical office use. 2. A six foot wood fence shall be erected along the southern and eastern boundarie of the property prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. I Seconded by Ms. Cole. ~Mr. Claiborne stated that it is racy encouraging to see ..,i preservation of a neighborhood. He said that thhe Commis- - sLon appreciated the fact that the petitioner was trying to be compatible with the surrounding area. Mr, laaman added that he a preclated the fact ttat the petitioner w.s improving the street. Ms. Brock stated that even if it violates the concentration policy the office use is much acre desirable than multi- family. Vote was called and motion unanimously carried (6-0). B. Z-1849. Petition of Dr. John Y. looks and Dr. James +,1 enielson, representing Windsor Joint Venture, requesting a change in coning from the single family (SF-7) district to the planned development (PD) clsssifieatien and approval of a concept plan on a 15.18 acre tract located 12S feet west of Stuart Road • proximately 700 feet north of Windsor JJ Drive. The property !a further described as a tract in t k the B.B.B. 6 C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 1166. l 1 w approved, the planned development will permit the foliouing ]I x. land uses: Uplexes - 104 dwellin units on 12.75 acres with a density of 8. S units per acre. Four-ylexes - 36 dwelling units on 2.10 acres f „x ? with a density of 9.24 units p:r acre. Forty-six notices were tailed to propertyy owners within j1. 200 feet; two reply forms were received in favor; six y reply forms were received in opposition. II PETITIO11R, Jim Danielson, 2$01 Bowling Green, stated that } this is a difficult piece of pproperty to design, He said that they are surrounded by pplanned developments on two aides and single family (SF•7) on two sides. He said that ' In the next feu years the number of young professionals and i empty nesters will be increasing and that this is where the ,E at m%rkst is geared. He said that they have designed a tran- y sitlon on the south from two story to one story and four- plea to duplex. He sold that th*v would be retaining the trees that currently exist as much as p01l:610. He said that the duplex they are proposing will be owner occuppied. He sold that they felt this s a reasonable and feasible land cse. 1 John looks, 1320 Dsrmouth, stated that a creek runs on Chu north side of the propertyy and serves at i natural boundary crce the single family. He said that they tried to design r' 1*' a use that would to consistent with the Current uses in the area, He said that In the p"sc 1 and 1/2 years there have air been two other proposals ant their proposal attemppts to It K.a, overcome the deficiency In the other two pions. He said that to develop as single Easily would Incur high land ,J costs and it is not economically feasible. He said that f J.a~b)•~.A.f zn,w. 1 pt psi' ' 1 ~ Y I DATE: January 20, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT e I TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER 13 BID# 9609 STUART-PERSHING PAVING 6 DRAINAGE ,j RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Change Order 03 be approved for $43,500.00, fhere~y comppeeiing the drainage on Stuart as required by the State Highway Department and it's connection with Loop 288. SUMMARY: The City of Denton advertised and sent out for bid, proposals to be received by the City of Denton on May 6, 1986 - our Bid N 9"39 Stuart Pershing Paving and Drainage. The bid was awarded to Atkins Brothers Equipment Co., Inc, flir 1445,227.35 on July 2, 1986. The sub-contractor has been R.L. Roberts Construction Co. for this job. We have had two previous change orders and this is the third which is necessary to meet the requirements of the State Department of Highways for drainage. The proposal attached for this change order is for $43,500,00. The total of the two approved change order amounted to $56,630.00 add this change order of $43,500,00. Total change orders $100,130.00. This represents a 22.5% of the total protect, which is still under 2.% of the original contract price. M1 ~ } j This change order proposal by R. L. Roberts Construction Co. through Atkins Brothers Equipment Co. has been reviewed by Jerry Clark of our engineering staff and we recommend this change order be approved. ` BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet Change Order Proposal Memorandum - Jerry Clark PRGBRAMS DEPAATiiENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: This will complete the protect and have State Rig ay epartment approval for drainage from New Loop 288. ` FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund. Respec ly sybwtt Gibs r~ Lloyd V. arre City Manager Pre i b;•: s ° Tit! P+atfrsing Agent r it1. Rrth I g Agent Y . n $,Lj 4.~'M^" •1 r.:A•J n' « , .4 t,; , Wy R,.Y 11 t--, {il . . r I I 1 I t I 111 1 9609 I JFSKE 1 ATKINS I CALVERT 1 DICKERSON IAACHIIECIURE I 1111 "TIM 6TUART-PERSHING PAVING ICONSTRUt1104 I IRDG. I PAVING ICONSIAUCi10N I UT1LI11ES, I I DRAINAGE 1 CO. I EOUIPHENI I Co. I CO. I INC. I fMEMEO NAY 1916 2 P.N. I I t0. I I I I Accoxil I I ! I I I I I - - I............. I............. I 1 1 0T1 I ITH HURIP1100 I VENOOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I ....L. .:.I .....I............. I............. I............. I............. I............. 1 lAspNit Alternate rill 1 1 4320714.35 1 4151106.75 1 563094)!10 1 561,062.20 I 11041 prolacl I I I I I I 1 1 I t t I N I lkphalt Alternate rit% 1 1445,221.35 t 445,614.75 1 374,197.30 1 543,f01.70 I I Ifol1 project plus Juno I I I I I I tAliorai+to I I t I I I { I I I ) 1 7e 1 SCoacroto Altoroeto rlIk 1 5561231.95 1 479,742.40 1 414,731.25 1 I 640,IS1.11 I I 4Total Pro)oct I I I I I I 1 21 1 1Coacrofe Altora4to rfll 1 510,574.45 1 492,110.90 1 499,313.15 1 1665,190.60 I 1 ltof+l Project plot lmro I I { I I I I lAlterolo I I I I I t I I I I I ) i 1 IRo41 Acme 111 1 144,406.65 1 109,394.60 1 156,951.25 1 104,417.45 1 142,922.)5 I l ISectloa 7 hill I I I I I I I I I I I t I 1 1 4 I 1106+) low Sig 11 3 1 t 554,621.9S I 6021640.00 1 414,314.75 1 736,023.1S 1 I I t ~ t I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I t I I I, . 77 _ °WM.Y4<IS4..gMNl0.'i1g7111.gof~pililk+ln 1 i 1 .5 I PROPOSAL R. L Roarts ConctrUdiln, Inc, p.0. 00X 376 Ow 1/5161 6ANOEAI TX MISS IIIII& tOM466.T1d7 sh"Nn (017) 48&7261 Mhek To M lewlemal Aw PrefMrl W W ktla/ TN Hama city of Denton ey" Stuart load Stroot l Denton city Denton State Texas `t tr C SUN 'fetal 76201 06" of PWw I We hope" room N III~ Cot mataNela Vol oa,fopm tM rear naeeeavY k,r aw aan,tletiom of Stuart pond - Cheap Order 13 350 L.F. 54" l.C.p 5 5 90.00 1 31,500.00 2 oath 6tt6' Junction Got 1 $2,000.00 1,000100 1 each 6'x6' Junction Sox 1 12,600.00 2,600.00 d 600 C.T. Channel tacawtioa ! 1 1.00 2,100.00 700 C.T. corpactad TL11 ! $ 0.00 2,800. Sect Claud. 1 IS0.00IC.T. % 1 1 r ~ nr >x •{y All mewnal is SuwMaN to N N gerAN. ad" ebm ,apt N be Orkr+nM N aoordnaa aM %M dp/Mtgf aM lpaC111NeVOna autunlttN ter adea wapk and eomglNN Ina f„batantlfl repttnenllka MVI lap the fu of rotty-throe thenaeed fire bunarad 6 00/100-------- Wwq u13,S00.00 wkn 00M M to to male as mom This it a snit ptito hid, laynant to be nude upon actual maaurarent, paylant to to suds upon toarolatioa of job. M1 r , ' rr w r ruare 0111 11 oem w • a~at w IlaeaeatkdVY auktnklal , , W W I an so as d" ciao#" AN WW4" ar cart Y Itnte aura r ttasIvL now • own ow at ratat w rr y Ma,~ r 4r d" U,l Wan- pwrt0lr~rwrtl+NM rraM'ww and Mwt nr UL's MM ".Tw Wes" M" be WI Poll ty W 1 nN e00aagd a ACCMfAMC! 0' MOrO~AI ~.r TM ekew W4 M aj " ll alrtf and aenl W$N spa aatlatafarV and en hraM aaaaflat YOU an euNapWd N de YM W" N atwlbad r 5 0lie rleb)medaNd, eknw ^`I ~A 5 1 '6TH- J Cast u 1 ' i ' i 111 I +tr QITy of DRNTON / 215 E. McKinney I Denton, Texas 78201 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 9, 1987 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer SUBJECT: Stuart/Pershing Project " The bond election passed by Denton voters on December 13, 1986, contained the Stuart/Selene project for 1986-87. A majority of the drainage project has been constructed under Bid 19609 by Roberts Construction. This was necessary since the Stuart program included the low spot on Stuart near Selene. The drainage problems there were severe. To protect the investment on the street, drainage had to be added to the project. This allowed the majority of the project to be deleted from the bond issue above except the $S01000. The State Department of Highways - District 18 - required the +a City of Denton to extend S4" pipes across a right-of-way clip at Stuart and Loop 288. The day light ditch necessary for the ` Stuart/Selene outfall left steep sides on the right-of-way unable to meet State safety slope requirements. Therefore, the pipe had to be installed at the specific location in the right- of•way that would not later have highway culverts M installed. The proposal for Roberts Construction is for $43,SOO. We have reviewed the prices which all seem to be reasonable. The $2400 for channel excavation may not be necessary which will leave about $10,000 to cover right-of-way costs along the east of Stuart from Juno to Loop 298. Those costs were not budgeted r but will now be covered. In summary, this contractor is already on the project which is nearing completion. The '-V enclosed prices are good, the completion would be immediate, i' and there would be no conflict later with installation responsibility with the Stuart Road contractor. . Jar 1 , P.B. Ct Bn er I 04348 wH j r ~ i ` DATE: 1/20/87 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT C T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of the Whitney Park Addition and Preliminary Plat of the Denton Pilgrim Addition, lot 1, Block A. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat of the Whitney Park Addition with two conditions concerning access or street layout and looping of a water line. The Commission recommends approval of the Denton Pilgrim Addition with no conditions. SUMMARY: Twenty nine (29) SF-10 lots on 9.57 acres adjacent and south of Longridge Drive approximatelYi900 feet east F.. of Teasley Lane is proposed for the WWhh Denton Pilgrim Addition is a 5.0 acre SF-10 parcel i located north of Teasley across from Sam Houston Elementary. { # Immaculate Conception Catholic Church may build a new facility at this site in the future. BACKGROUND: Not applicable p „ PROGRAMS DBPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Owners/City of Denton FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined Respe liy submitted: r oy arre , ty anager Prepared By: ,t son Senior Plansfer Approved: r I ,t I ' ry Director 'of Manning y, and Development P ........v,LNvT41-♦,.SQ4W~NI^.YA:'.AtY.e..rJ :yyNS'a.:..4nxr.wre+-•. > •..~rr.pwL1f4U5F++.P +C l 't 1 ?y' i. V I e' n i 3 CJ. k i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET METING DATE: January 20, 1987 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Denton Pilgrim Addition, Lot 1, Block A s a` SUKKARY: This single family (SF-10) parcel is 5.0 acres in size and is located adjacent and north of Teasley Lane across from Sam Houston Elementary School. The property will possibly serve as the future home of immaculate Conception Catholic Church. An 8" sanitary sewer and 16" water line must be extended across the Teasley Lane frontage of the ~f property. No public drainage or street < improvements are required. t ACTION RBQUIRCDt Approval RECOWMNDATIONt The Planning and Zoning Commisoion recommends y approval. „ t: ALTERNATIVE, Approval ATTACHMBNTt Reduced plat r , r. rl ~ j , i Y I y L1 y `J 't brq. 1 , A I 5 1744t/2 I 1] .C.,. °`MfMW,~i'e.~`di4:.ti~99:i.Vdi.•n:pikJ."kN::6if~17CA2A':-01~J+fk i,?Ywl,4~.r•:',t,~•.a....u.grww4wM 1 • 0 OLL 4 ~ f ~ 3Y.f~ AhY! ~dN K~' ~ fNW /y aM11b1~ ~ ,'v f WAS M. N 4 PD-91 t Y161Wfi' MAr D~w~+aa 4rv~t wr C. ItW~ia LOT 1 _ NL (Udr A'Kdv) < S >SR•10 B L 0 C A DE TDM PI~GRf A 1r 4W ' or JOIN M &G " *"Y A/411IAGM'(' N0.74'f N04 Ar+VaiM YN►M N A""t 5.0 0 zoN,Na: tr•a -Its OxAw ~ tRfY 0 bLIRMI f~9~'MN MiV1. .wwnr rTir+A 4~ f f L Nov IN w V40. W~ wM. .rte y L NO P/MNAMM ^4*446 fN fMNV/ ' N4../' ` • , - • 1 1V aa.. 4 41 W M1M~ rMIMN/ fnWfTrvd. pMl. " t.~~ ~4I r rw . APAW t NR' ..+e rM, r Mi"• ~ .L IIAlYlb1 WA "Wrwy u fff w W ( C.IA V7 W oKe,r(sl.e~ PeELIMIbN~A~RY _ P_ BURKE ENGINEERING toe 't''L''M total LD/r OLV 44 L649 It. Wm or ~nFN7~AN Rl~ >,RI dnnIrInN ' ocyTOU,n11ut~:ot I~Irrslt•nA t- 1I CC tYrn b-C 2 3 INS p.pviSED r I ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET ~I MEETING DATE: January 200 1987 SUBJECT: Approval of the Preliminary Plat of the Whitney Park Additions Phase i and II 1 j SUMMARY: This is a 9.57 acre (29 lots) SP-10 single family detached subdivision to be located adjacent and south of Longridge Drive approximately 900 feet east of Teasley Lane. Lynhurst Lane, a residential street will be r extended to the west. The school district owns adjoining property and Lynhurst Lane will either be cul-de-saced or become a private street or bus lane if a school is built in the future. (Lynhurst Lane will not connect with Teasley Lane.) Savannah Trail is the only other existing street proposed for extension and it is yI also a residential street that is being p cul-de-aaced and terminated with this plat. ,s The property is not within the 100 year plain and a small drainage flume is the only on site drainage improvement required. The developer is escrowing funds for a culvert under Teasley Lane , for off-site drainages the culvert will not be installed until after the state makes improvementa to TeasleY Lane. Sewer service is in place and available for FI extensions. The rxisting 6' water line on Lynhurst Lane and Longridge Drive needs to be looped to provide adequate domestic service and w+ fire protection and to satisfy policy to 1 eliminate deadend lines where possible. All other utilities are in place or available for 6 y 1 extension. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat with or without conditions recommended by the Development Review Committee. ~Ir zv ;i b ~ III ~ • f ( fir. 1 n .ymrlo-d.+..:w.. rv.v..,.:w.. r..p Y.-.ti'~rM:.A: , ~..ai.."., r .,».a.:i..~..,W....4'/UAAli•':~ 4,n'nwti;.9~:'1MA'i e''~nv.. w ,..n...»,.. r . 1 ` ' l I i,tck-ULi January 20, 1987 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval with the following conditiones 1. An off-site temporary turnaround agc.ieable to developer$ school district and Development Review Committee must be designed prior to acceptance of a final plat$ otherwise, Lynhurst Lane will have to be cul-de-saced on final plat. 2, The proposed water line layout must be looped from Longridge to Lynhurst Larne to eliminate deadend lines. r ` ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat X ' r' 1760s ~i ♦ /4 kr~t'W.fQIr~,.Wr,...a... . .n,... ,-„r;.nt,4 .r4~4.a:.Ay4. MJ bC.~Yww... a......a..~ ' HI~ib4>Je';: Mna..l,tie'i.1. dY{W A,nsY~ M C ~ IL OCRb L,r "L~"Ad..• ►LOCI ` V % RlnO N p4a OR 651 t~' f L•I AUOV fl A 11 ~.at.me+. X 141`, rU 110 NO Lit / ` / i°~ IrR fF, 41CINITI MAP i / M L % 0 / R / M II / Ml • ~LAb !'e AV M JOY 70 'AAA ! f!M ' ~ AiClAr Idrr4NDllf A001/A! • KA A/ M. 7 a / 9.527 ACRE'S J. Ne"AN $U 1of Y Assmor AAA 197 rA (I.H 1 ct L AOPA1'N IN rw w a "W" a &"MA, mew ~ sareuA teen 1. l• "Joe rAtLpt IL ".*Atom? WS, Am!-$. 1E yry„t fILK ~Ig1.0 Trsct eM •IJLeM 1^•Mrtf L•,.LI W-1". A f ) PVL.' To 1t UtIM WRt.rtt. . _ M V!. Z. _ _ ° i L. LIf let. to M 10.000 M. h. oe,r'. I OWNER, TEAkEY RO re I * ASSOCIATES ►AIYrA raa Do. K0 100 AW 111 Auff" TX PAW `WV. f'REUIVINWRY P~Ar BURKE ENGINEERING >o • "'~~;,R, 411 S. COUP, WIT[ 101 ^u Nil MET MAY AMMON R +y-~4 Y Demo, n~uI 74:01 46111644- ,7I4 r ~a 0923L k NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT i FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; THE EX FORVANIEFFECTIYfi DATfipENDITURE OF FUNDS T}1EREFORE; AND PROVIDING WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has r reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the A+ lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; u. , and M + WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to 8e used for the pure ha a and the materials, equipment, supplies or services appved accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. y' That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid lowest attached responsibl,e bare ids hereby for such accepted items;and approved as being the Proosals" BID NUMBER INO. VENDOR AMOUNT ' f L t1o ora SR 96a L CO. A 606 11 05 _A SECTION Ila That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered {A items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons, submitting the bids for such items and agrees to { a G, . lF 1 ~.yWP'N1'1y 4'4h f yr..r k y i . l " " purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities 11 and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting approved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a f formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, k approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums ` contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. " . SECTION IV. v That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered k., items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. i' 4r That this ordinance shall become effe:tive immediately upon its passage and approval. r PASSED AND APPROVED this 2. day of January , 1987, ar r a a" . RAY STEPHEN91 CITY OF DENTON,ATEXAS A,. ATTEST: CHAROTTE AbLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS or, BY: i v f r _x PACE Two ,rr y{.i4.`I Wry V. ~..a:...., .q, ...r.: r ♦ or. .i V DATE: January 20, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID/ %82 CONSULTATION AND CHEMICALS (WATER TREATMENT AT POWER PLANT) j RECOMiENOATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder Nalco Chemical Co. for the estimated evaluated yearly total of $39,964.56. SUMMARY: This bid is for the continual testing, consultation and treatment of discharged sewage waters and/or raw lake water for use as cooling water for the steam turbine units. We have had this service and purchased r the chemicals for some time and this is the continuation of service and products. This type of service is not available from many companics. We fell lucky t y to have received two bids each time this has bid. Both of the bidders have had this contract before. ~s{ } BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet ."t Memorandum - Jerry Crisp PR06RAM i DEPARTiVATS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Electric Production Division of the Electric Utility f Department. ,r f1 1L IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund. l Respectf y yu" it 0 C ityyManagerrell r I j „z Prepared by: E AGM91j, Marshall (tli, Purchasing Agent _ Approved: I arshall rf1)1, urchaslnq Agent y` r 1. K 1 I I 1 i BID 1 9682 1 NALCO I MALEC 1 RAYCHEM I PAYCHEM I I I 010 TITLE LONSULYATION 1 CHEM 0.7. 1 CHEMICAL I CHEMICAL I SUFFLY 18 SUFFLY I I I OWD 12-1-86 2111 1'.M. I INC. I INC, I to. I CO. I I I ACCOVNtI 8fA•D89-1251-9115-F512 1 I I I 1 I I 1 DAY 1 YEAR I DAY I YEAR I I I s I•------------i-----•--`---•I•--------•-°I-------------I--_ i-------------1 1 I DIY 1 170 DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDDR I I I............. I-------------I---••-----___i------------- I-------------I------•------1 I I i i I I I I I 18AYHIB 131 1 1 1 15,138 1 16,138,51 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 2, 3 I@AYSFEnSE 212 I I I ?1,121 1 11,959,11 i I ! ! i I I 1 1 S ! 3. I 11AYDUEST 252 t I I 61.118 I 23,312.81 1 I I I ' 1 ! I I I I 4 1 1. 1 16AYCIH 315 1 1 1 19.311 1 7,115.31 1 1 I .r . '.1 I 1 I I I I I ` li 1 I@[OC101: 113281 1 2),IS I 9,633.36 I t I I I F' 2r 1 I INOWDR 173911 1 32.91 I 11,676.61 1 f 1 I t _ D I 1 1 I I l,', 1 IIIBF9CElVl 11311E 1 22.11 1 71971.11 1 t ! I I J 1 I 1 l t ~rt !I 1FOl97AlA20lE 573631 t JL11 I 11,681.11 I S 1 I I .1 I 1 1 t f I 1 t I ! I I I I t I I I IfOTAL SERVICES EST. MIN. 1 I INCLUDED t 1 11621.11 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 i t I I ! I I I i I I TOM YEARLY COST 1 112.26 f 79,981.56 1 159.11 1 51,821.18 1 1 1 s: 1 t CHEMICAL 365 DAYS I I I I I I 1 t 1 T4IACYEOLY COST t I INCLUDED 1 1 11621.11 1 1 t 1 3 09,01CES t I 1 I E611MATED i 1 I 1 ! I I I 1 ' I I I t I i 1 i _ -•----..wu.....w..o.,.FM..www..........,_............w..a.~M.NbMr.ywawr-s_._....,.__.. ___-....n.ur..,....,,.......-..r+w..Mw.b...M..p. . a AID qCITY OF DEMON UIurA, M E M O R A N D U M I • fff ~I [ 1 + b T T0: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent I FROM. Jerry Crisp, Acting Maintenance Supervisor DATE: December 30, 1986 SUBJECT: Chemical Bids f*yVL All the bids for consulation and chemicals for water treatment have been reviewed by Cecil Jones our water Treatment Technician, and myself. r 41 We have visited with the people from Nalco and see no reason not to accept their bid number 9682 for consuiation and chemicals for water treatment at the City of Danton's Power Pleat, ' Jar Cr sp~Act ng Mai aaao~ Suparv, sor Ble tric Production Division W tl „ ,.,,rl JC/b j r' co s i • Y' I r K4n F :ar~ r r r ~~k DATE: January 20s 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID / 9695 SELF,--t=INo ScPAPER RECOR UDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid meeting specification of Mega Equipment in the amount of $162,628.18 for a John Deere 862-B Scraper. 1 f $URY; This bid is for the purchase of a 16 cubic yard self loading scraper for use s, at the Municipal Landfill. It will replace a unit that has been rented for the past six months. A machine of this type it required to preform the excavation for dump sites and for the collection, transport and distribution of cover dirt. in BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet t ~ AL PROGRAMS, DEPARTME1113 OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Motor pool and Landfill operations. y y F1SCAl IIPACTi This unit will be funded through the Motor Pool equipment lease/purchase agreement previously approved by Council. Payments for 1966/87 will come from Budget Account 630-024-0800-8508. Resple , ly submitted: ~kM1 J I , Lloyd V Harrell City Hanger I Prepared -by: Raises To Shaw r Title: Aest. Purchasing Agent Approved, i v P: ' °xe W.,rl T . ohn Mar than . `Ftip ~~~l1 Purchasing Agent ~d.t6+.a+M+rtM'n.rs . ..~.,.,s..,. .*RPa.'w'u>rMr ,ti d «,c.u ..MrV:~d i 1 a¢ lly ;rn• .:.'fSA*k.'+,4'~tP>41~"i?'"°l!N?.ii.lw°rRKH44+w'MZN1}!F I t I I I all 1 9695 1 MEGA 1 DARR I I 1 Oil 1111E SELF LOADING SCRAPER I ENIFNE41 I EQUIFMENI I k t GPENED 1-9-8J 2:111 P.M. I Co. I CO. I I I ACCDUMII 63@-821-6613-65@@ I I ! I I 1 i I I I ;.-------.-.--1------------- I.......---...1 1 I QTY` I ITEM DESCPIFIION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 V9110A I --1......-_.._..I............. 1--------•----t-------------I 1 _ I I i I I t L 15ILF LOADING SCRAPER 1 1621620.18 1 113+911.11 1 1 1 _ I I _1 I I 1 1 MANFACIURER I JOHN DEERE I CATERPILLAR t 1 1 ' i i 1 1 ! I I' MODEL 1 162-1 1 615 1 t 1 I I f 1 I ! 1 1 1 I 1 1 t t I DELIVERY 1 61-91 DAYS I 56 DAYS I 1 t } I I_ I I i 1 I ~ I _t t I I t 1 1 1 1 } 1 1 1 1 1 i i -"1 I I I I I t r. T r y--. , ~._-rr~~,q.{dN1yMI°ML.Yrvuww.MnHM.~.M°A~°~r"'r-,•- - J DATE: January 20,198T CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager i SUBJECT: BM / 9696 WIRR MD POWER CABT~ RECOMMEi1DATI0i1: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, k Poleline Electric for all four items at total bid price of $30,029.00. n k SUM MY: This bid is for the purchase of electric wire and power cable. This material is re,~lacement for warehouse stock and will be used by the Blectric Distribution Department in the maintenance and new construction of the distribution system. Tabulation Sheet l FR-90M, DEPARTtENTS OR CROUPS AFFECTED: warehouse inventory j s fISCAI Il~ACT: 1986181 Budget Funds for working Capital Warehouse Stock s' Account Number Trio-043-0582-8708 Respectf ly submitted: " L10 merrelI }X , City Manager r w+y r ca Prrpared by: Naaw: Tom Shaw Title: Aset Purchasing Agent Approved: 1 Jo Marshall 11i: Purchasing Agent t 1N;►~'Y{P6I'+1Ltl^.4NM,a.n.- We, c _ L I 1 1 ! 1 I ! t i 118 1 9696 ISOUTMNESTERN I GAAYRAR I NELSON I CUMMINS I PDLELINE 1 fRILSTER I TEMPLE I NESCO I DID TITLE MIRE I CABLE I ELECTRIC I ELECTRIC I ELECTRIC I SUPFLY I ELECIRIC I SUPPLY I INC. I I OPENED 1-8-17 2:11 P.N. I I I I 1 I I I 1 ACCOUNTI 71-143-1582.8718 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I J I-----------••i-•-----_..---i-••------•-•-I----•--------I-••--•-------. I------------- I I STY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR i VENDOR I VENDOR i I-------------I._........_..I-------------I---•-------•-I-•--•------•-i•----_-------t......••-..._;------•----•-I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1: 1 11,111 1191161 DL'PLET 14 1 145.11 1 151.11 1 148.91 1 137.91 1 135.48 1 181.81 I 154.11 1 141.11 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 2.- I ' 5,111 0191111 TRIPLEX 711 1 495.11 1 531165 1 518.75 1 496.11 1 479.24 1 561.01 1 547.11 1 513.11 1 1 i I 1 1 1 I I I I 3. 1 5,111 !191115 IRIPLEX 411 I 757.11 1 821.15 1 778.11 1 759.91 1 735.61 1 1,218.11 1 641.11 1 774.11 1 ~1 } I 1 1 I ! 1 ! I t 4. 1 50,000 1191171 ORD 12 C04C. XLD 1 404.11 1 521.68 1 495.11 1 516.91 t 452.11 1 561.11 1 545.11 1 519.11 1 ' I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I t 1 I ! I I I 1 I I ¢ I I TOTAL ! 31,911.11 1 34,414.11 1 32,671.11 1 33,513.51 1 31,129.11 1 49,081.11 1 33,725.01 1 33,135.11 1' ` 1 1 1 I I I 1 I ! . I i I I I I ! i I 1 1 l k DELIVdf ITEMS 1.3 1 STOCK 1 STDCK I STOCK 1 7-21 DAYS I. S1DCK I STOCK 1 7-11 DAYS I 14 DAY9 I I I DWIERY ITEM 4 1 1 9 MKS 1 SIDCK 1 45 66 DAYS 1 7 21 WS 1 41 56 DAYS 1 1 MKS 1 9 lk MKS 1 14 DAYS I I I I I I I 3 t ! S I 1 I I I 1 I I I . , 'r ~NMA.IwNV•-v~'wyW.......M vi'a'. a DATE: January 20, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council r ~ FROM: Lliyd Y. Harrell, City Manager Y SUBJECT: BID / 969T RSEVSB CONTAIBEW 30 Cu. Yards RECOMMOATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the loxeat bidder, I.D.S. is the total amount of $28,685.00. " 4,. i + SUMWRY: This bid is for the purchase of three 30 cubic yard self contained Refuse Cctore and one 82 yard closed container. This equipment will be utilized ~N« by the solid waste department to swat new customer demands. , . 8ACK8ROlMID: Tabulation Sheet t, Y ~ PMWMlS, DEPARTMTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Solid Waster Collection -.5°~ FISCAL IIipAC1: This equipment will be funded through the lease/purchase agreement previously approved by City Council. a 'Y r Respectfully submitted: i A + Lloyd rrurml) City Manager r Pie ared by$ bs Names Tom 6hsw Title, Asst. purchasing Agent Approved: re 11~ Jo Pu haling Agent d C.A~""°t... x7~dY•N..r•....-- .............ea~w. ,.rxw:wW .n•w.~,,,.., .r ih ka.gi.~q111.~ . 715 n . , . a~ -.r I I I I I 116 1 4b91 I DUNCAN t ENCO I 1. D.S. I 110 TITLE REFUSE CONTAINERS I ENIFMENT I I I I OP£NEO !-$-p) 2161 P.M. I Co. I I I I i ACCOIMI1 631-121.1192-9116 1 I 1 1 I 1 i ..as . ..............-......I.............1............-1.............1-------------1 / I' 'PTY 1 ITEM USCRIPIION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOA 1 ---f i............. 1............. 1.............1 i; I I I I I • 1. ` 1 19 ELF CONTAINED AORTADLE 1 9,111.11 1 Na 1 11315.11 1 I i ICOMPAtTORS i 1 i I I 1, 1- I 1 t 1 1 2 1 1 ICLDSED RECEIVER CONTAINERI 41125.11 1 1 31651.11 1 I 1 Ili CU1ll; YARD 1 I I I I , I I DELIVERY ITEM 1 I 21 DAYS 1 1 21 HAS t t ( I 1 1 I I I ! I i DELIVERY ITEM 2` I 21 DAYS 1 1 21 HAS I I S` I. MLANCE ITEM t 1 31 DAYS 1 I IB HAS I i f K I 1 'I t I I t f f i I I I t +'-~.•n....aumY m.Wil%IFxwwmw.......~....w.e..wo+n+'awa++..s.•. _ waew,y,~llY~Mi.~~i'a'~`w~"'•"'°•w nwwwr......~-~`~: v a a s . DATE: January 20, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager > SUBJECT: BIDE %98 STREETLIGHTS II RECOiMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder for each j item: Items 1, 3, 4, 5 to Temple, Inc. In the amount of $37,264.00 Items 2, 6 to Cummins in the amount of $13,220,00 a ar For a total award of $50,484.00. I SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of streetlight fixtures to 3 replace Warehouse inventory, These streetlight fixtures are used by the Electric Distribution Department for replacements and new installation of streetlights. f'x BACKGROUIID: Warehouse Inventory for Electric Distributio Tabulation Sheet ~RO$RAMS. DEPARTIEMTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: , Warehouse' Inventory for Electric Distribution F15CAL 111PAC7: Budget Account 1 710-043-0582-8108 "X Rasp ec lly submitted: 1 It FF 001, C + Llo V. Harrell r , t- City Manager •I' Prepared by: ' Act r Denise nning ' Titles Buyer Yet •r, 41 Approvedl W t ,I eaies ohn J. Marshall Tftlirl Purchasing Agent ~~1$iv%'Y aF.. ..r« ,e{+6+{l+C:n•.'NI«elnvM.avvrv,sa....w:v..,...-..., ' i Y" 9 IA- 1 5. , _ ^,s .,,r : x ..re^"a.Y~}F7I•y`aK'Ma'ros.yna+ro'v-..-.,..... I I 1 I 1 I I i I I DID # 9691 1 DEALERS I CDDM I CUMMINS I PRIESIER I DRAYIAR I NESCO I TEMPLE I KNERAL I NELSON I DID 717LE STAEETLISHIS I ELECTRIC I ELEEIRIE I SUPPLY I WFLY I ELECTRIC I I INC. I ELECTRIC I ELECTRIC t OPENED 1=13-81 NO P.M. I f I I 1 1 I I 1 3 ACCOUNT4 711-143.582-8711 I I I 1 I I I I t I 1 I ! I I ! f ! I ............°^-°--••---.I---------•---I-•-----------I----•--- _..-I------------- I------------- I..-._........I•-.......- °•-I•-••-------••I I DIY ' 1 ITEM DESCRiFT10N I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I 1 ..-...-..-....t_.•..-._.....t..........••-i...._.......--1 I I I I I I I I I I 1. 1 311 illl WAIT, TYPE It 1 14,148.11 1 i1,335.18 I 14,111.81 1 131311.11 1 14,442.11 t 12,631.11 I 11,121.11 1 18,111.11 1 13,411.11 1 t 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 NI It 11 WATT] TYPE t1.4 1 9,422.11 1 11,171.11 1 91321.11 1 11,211.11 1 9,616.18 1 9,561.11 1 11,111.11 1 12,181.0 1 11,247.DO I 1 I I I 1 I t t 3. ''I m ills 401, 7YPE V 1 81911.11 1 81771.11 1 81826.11 1 81961.11 1 9,198.11 1 8,324.14 1 79711.01 1 12,111.0 1 8,871.11 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 40 l 34 1251 NATI 481 V, TIPE Iii 1 2,628.11 1 21752.58 1 29591.11 1 2,184.11 1 2,113.41 1 2,431.51 1 29314.11 1 21933.11 1 21185.51 1 ! l I I I t I I I k S. 1 210 1254 Wit 1217241Vi lit 1 17,784.11 1 18,351.11 1 17,861,11 1 189561.11 1 11,156.11 1 16,251.11 1 159361.11 1 229886." I 18,511.10 1 1 1. : l 1 1 1 ! t i t ! I 1 4. I 251 lLAM3' 251 All NPS t 41121.51 1 49625.11 1 3,911.11 1 41241.11 1 4,122.51 1 4.112.51 1 41175.!1 1 61125.10 1 41511.51 1 1 I I I t I t ! 1 I 1 I I ' i l 7 E I i i 1 l I IOIAL 1 $6,927.111 $9,112.511 56,513.111 61,114.!11 $9,132.911 53,311.111 519339.111 73,944.111 59,573.4101 I ~ ~ I ! I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I blivlry 1 42 DAY 1 8 NX 1 28-42 DAY I 4.6 WNI 1 4.6 NN 1 4.4 WK 1 1-4 WK 1 45 DAY 1 45-61 DAY I ' k I I I I I 1 I I I ! 1 ! t note I I 1 1 I 1 11-5 1 1 J 611 or-none 1 1 I I I I I 1 i i11-or-none I i I t I I I 1 I I I I I ....~...~.,.rMwwYtYYif.Y.'.."RIUf~1Wa[M~~~nr. W.r.r...~.n ~..~..~..wr... 1P~~~\.T ' ,p tr• e 7 1 0923E NO. l f~ AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR E EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain contracts requiri an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding ng V10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the cityy or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, r ma nary or equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: fi SECTION 1. + That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or t to preserve" the property of the city, or to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen yi damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: r PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT , k 77032 Trans-Tex Supply $12,640.00 SECTION 1I6 That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase orders and to make payment therefore in the I ftt I h ~ amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids. SECTION III. " That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon t its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 20th day of January, 1987. a~ b a E f CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: . s' ACTING CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 5 lM°4 a r 4> APPROVED,AS TO LEGAL FORM: DE3AA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY Lk ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS bY: Low) x1 koZa r;. I va'~.; I PAGE TWO r a C ' e p , o arr'~P+'.:?ir Jr 4aN' ®'+~~i,%4EMY"'•r o 1.;.:r , I+v-.a.... r i DATE: January 20, 1937 i CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager j SUBJECT: RNMENCY K 1;;BASE ORDER #TT032 to TRANS TE( SUPPLY f ! j RECCNWMTION: We reco=end this purchase order to Trans-Tex Supply in the amount of $12,600.00 be approved. ? SUMlMRY: This emergency purchase vas for 1600 feet of 12" rater pipe to replace exit ting line of Locust Street. This street is part of the repairing project II • and this line replacement should cut down on any digging up of the recently I repared street. W } tAC: Purchase order, memorandum sr ~ y" ~it9iMAMS. OEPARTMEKTS OR GAS AFFECTED: Water/Sever Field Services z 4 r ' FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted account #623-008-0061-9138 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager T.." h4pered by: . .rte Q' NateMis Denise ing Title: Buyer Approved: 4 John J1 Marshall I!1!! Purchasing Agent .ri CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 901.8 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201 P.O. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT T' 77032 01/09/87 r17 J TRA52500 VENDOR SHIP TO. TRANS-TEX SUPPLY CO WAT1R t SEWER FIELD SERVICE enX 166 CONFIRMATION ONLY } ARLINOTONs TEXAS 76010 00 NAT DUPLICATE 1 . CONFIRM IOC ' ~ BID/REP. S ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AM00i yK 01-.623 006 0e61 9136 1600 . FT• 12MC-900: 0150 12 s640.t r r:` Y. . r v r 1 + The City of canton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. rarAL OR v.n. 126eao.c Reference P.O. Number on all 8,1,11hipments and Involess 'Shipments eta F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Inflected. By Sand Invoices TO: Direct Inquiries TO Clry of Denton, keounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P,M. Purchasing Agent s ' x218 E, Mcj?6;1sy St., Damon, TX 76201 Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M. Aist. Pdreheslnpp Agent ' (of of Inflected on Purchase Order) 817/668•0311 D/FW Moira 2117.0042 The City of Denton to an equal opportunity employer rr a y'Y 1`Lt ~~~x,'idd6n'rt~. N,. _a s y. , ...a.•. .....~v+ ,Ta nWr •W Paa i.` a . . 4 Y S tl e Qi l t 4 1 CITY OF DENTON urui i MEMORANDUM j TOQ Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent 4a FROM$ Bill Brown, Superintendent of Water/Sewer Field Services DATEQ January 71 1987 SVBJECTs 12" Water Pipe i am requisitioning 1600 feet of Class 900 water pipe for the purpose of replacing water line from Sherman Drive to Peach Street on Locusts This replaceaent is necessitated due to the repaving program which is 4 currently under way that would cover a pipe which is in poor condition i and should be replaced. It is considered an emergency purchase since i must start on this project the morning of the 12th of January, 1986, which limits my lead ' time to days rather than the weeks required for approval by the City Council through the bid process. 1 1 Your assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated. "A 168011287008 okl.', ~3rt rn i t i .:pr1 ;E= ~ I r° p V Yy Cn 1 . . y it t a 1695L s NO. { AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND ATKINS BROTHERS EQUIPMENT COMPANY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. F , WHEREAS, on July 2, 1986, the City awarded a contract for the construction of certain improvements to Stuart and Pershing r Roads; and WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended to the Council that a change order be authorized to asend such contract and said change order being in compliance with the requirements of art. 2368&9 V.A.C.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That the change order to the contract between the City an tkins Brothers Equipment Company in the amount of a. Forty-three Thousand Dollars ($13,000) is hereby a proved &no the expenditure of funds therefor is hereby authorized. SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective Immediately upon its passage and approval. ;a PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987. RAY F MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; r ACTING CITY SECRETARY ;w. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ,w APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY I ?Vj r • n ..an c.' v sir:e.rr.-.~s't. .s3 k~.4.JM'•a°'s'w~ d 5-.s ,AwWWwftd k.. F DATE: January 20, 1987 CI1Y COUNCIL REPORT TO Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager. SUBJECT: OLkia ORDER 03 BID# 9609 STUART-PERSHING PAYING 8 DRAINAGE RECON IDATiON: We recommend Change Order 03 be approved for $43,500.00, thereby comp a ing the drainage on Stuart as required by the State Highway Department and its connection with Loop 288. _ SUMMARY: The City of Denton advertised and sent out for bid, proposals to received by the City of Denton on May 6, 1986 - our Bid N %09 Stuart Pershing Paving and Drainage. The bid was awarded to Atkins Brothers Equipment 1 Co., Inc- for 1445,227.35 on July 2, 1986. The sub-contractor has been R.L. Roberts Construction Co. for this job. We have had two. previous change orders and this is the third which is necessary to meet the requirements of the State Department of Highways for drainage. The proposal attached for this change order is for $43,500.00. The total s of the two approved change order amounted to $56,630.00 add this Change order of $43,500.00. Total change orders $100,130.00. This represents a 22.5% of the total project, which is still under 25% of the original contract price. +i. This change order proposal by R. L. .f Brothers Roberts Construction Co. through Atkins c gquipment Co. has been reviewed by Jerry Clark of our engineering staff and we recommend this change order be approved. SACKGRM: Tabulation Sheet Change Order Proposal v, Memorandum - Jerry Clark PROSKUIMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: This will complete the project n€ an nave a tae g ay epartment approval for drainage from New loop 288. x ? FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund. f Respectfully submitted: o Harrell City Manager a by: ell- r~ , rtle: Plsdwing AgAnt rr~, PYrv# 11g A~It r` . L~f~N,W a+.a - ...:.y u1a y:,.y,~ s.•. •.,H;,,.,an,.Y. x. . .i .n . _ a M t t e k;y R' 1 Ill 1 9609 1 iESKE I ATKINS I WENT I 11CKERM IAKOITECTME I 111 TITLE STNAAI-PEATAIINS PAYING IC006INXTION 1 14101. 1 PAVIN ICtNM IIPXIIU 1 U11t1TIEl, I I MAIMM I CO. I EIUIPMENI I CO. I CO. I IK. I ' IPm 049 4, 19M 2 P.N. I I CO. I I 1 I AM?I f t I 1 ...I............. I............. I............. I............. I------------- I I 1Tf I ITEN KnI1flu I YEN00A I YEm I YE N101 I Km I YEN10N I .I............. L ...I I............. I. .I III l hoelt Alternate with 1 1 .1326161.15 f 4351101.15 1 3631901.10 1 S611142.21 1 `R I 119tet ho*t I I I I 1 I I f t I l I I r 11 I IAsoall Alternate oitl 1 1 445,221.35 1 445,11!.15 1 374, 30 1 5131101.71 1 I iiota project }lee Ivan I I I I I t a, { IA1LKMl1 1 I t ! t i 1 I I I I t xc 2e 1 iCarcroto Alternate oil! 1 551,231.95 1 419,142.40 1 4611131.25 1 1 60,151.161 1+` I tiata helot I I I I I I ' .I I t I I I ' b I lCoocre4e Alternate olt6 1 370,511.15 1 1921110.10 1 4"1313.25 1 1 6151190.0 I I hotel Project ties Joe I I I I 1 1 t 1AttNOete I I I I I t ' I t t I I I I t 3 I 1160at ACree 1i1 1 1110406.65 1 1091394.14 1 156,95123 1 10,477.45 1 142,912.15 1 . t Ilectirl 1 Meee.i I I 1 I I I ~y, t I a: ! ~ I I I I I 4 1 tlota Lw Did it 4 3 1 1 554,421.95 1 402,10.10 1 4M,374.26 1 7369027.115 1 t I I ! I I I t I I I I I 'I 1 I ~t I 1 I I I f c' . _ .«......,.,.,w.rs.arrase+ikcw•hasltiau'woa•+wrna_awu~in'ew.i1[M+I+Nt+wMY'Oi4+KwrvesMaa..r..R+w........w.....,..~..,....._ i f~ Y 1 I~ ) y i la, I OWL, PROPOSAL R. L Ro*h Comhadon, Inc, me P.O. box 3n SANGRA, TX ?M Photo: (817) 46"41 n.n1111 Ha r 817) 466.1267 Praeaed WwMW Too 1Alert To Sr ltirteeewl Ate Name City of Denton j so" Deetoa Mrrn Stuart bad Mar Ta:ace 71201 Ck Dalton shy Tea ass n.1 N11u Phm Aloft" a, , Nh heretr aq.. to tawrh We nrrlsr w arOnn au My rrasearr tr :`r ornyaarn of 4 Stuart load • C3asom Order 13 M+ t 330 L.I. ",d" 2,C4 each Genf, Jumaties Son. f $2,0000.000 1 31,50.00 I sack Ira6' Jueatsee 1611 ,000.00 600 C.T. Chtaual Smaaratioa 1 6 $2,600.00 400 226800.00 1400.00 ' 700 C.T. Cagaatsd nu 1 1 4.00 2.Ipp.pp d „ 1 41 v c ' Soak Claws 4 630.00/C.T. ILL h \ f As imm iw is 1Mearyed r be r eer*A w the Mom went r he swan d in aaaerdrw WM ft awwp and w~:4 Nsa~ne4t+tht sulreltesd fa sbaa 006rt Of osmoidw in a substantial werimennq manna fur the sure of 7^ Iurt1-thred theussad fire Mildred 4 001100 ~r a43,s ~~a} +ast g1*rta r mama 11ri r letewe: Thad if await price hid. laymat to be made ulos actual asuuramat. .y Ps>rat to be ends upon. cotglsti0s of lob. ON atwrta * `saw tw w e aaarabe in"" ern + 4 rah mama r await ay ON Wasp amore as 11111010." w emm"tn1rM11111 4411 ~i YaMIY eIeM rMrr41Mw~tl,arelt4+ aw New .q yanaareawalw aree,a ~eawawrrara.aaae.wa r r Ile"-TW Mwraf mey be rNWa wm ev us 0 five SOWN Warm Mza. s; ,10CSP1I1= OF PROPOSAL TM sbene P414 tI Ioetlna ww etnMwq w wwthoom I ON on hv* waetrd Yet on aathsAW he M she wart as -real Petmat wM M nine is tuterrd ebtra r k i a: 1700L I k~ ! AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXEMPTED PROCUREMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 1368a, V. A. C. S.; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, I WHEREAS, art. 2368x, V.A.C.S. provides that the City need not follow the statutory bidding procedures for procurements where the functional requirements of the City can be satisfied by only one source; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to purchase certain hardware from I.B.M. Corporation, the Director of Data Processing having advised the City Council that only I.B.M. Corporation can meet the requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON. SECTION I. That the purchase from I.B.M. Corporation of four aega ytes is hereby appproved and the expenditure of funds therefor is hereby authorized, SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective lame a e y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the f day of , 1987. ,r C RAY ITY OF DENTONt MATUF TEXAS ATTEST: CITY Of DENTON, 4EXAS ' > APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA ADANI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYE . yr W, i^ Y . DATE: January 20, 1987 w CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ON= 76753 to I.B.M. RFC00lEMDATION: We recommed this purchase order in the amount of $20,000.00 for four k Px megabytes of memory to upgrade the IBM 4361 be approved for payment. Y; 47Ais purchase order is for the single source purchase of an upgrade on our existing IBM 4361. The enlarged memory capacity is necessary to speed trans actions, to tecomodate the new court clerk software, the new inventory/purchasing software and to eliminate bottle necks in the data retrieval and paging rate. Asa, This upgrade is recommended by IBM and our Director of Finance and the Data Processing Advisory Board. FR04RANS. OEPARTI U OR 01111 AFFECTED: a Data Processing FISCAL IMPACTs_ 1986/87 Budget Funds Account Number 100-036-0017-8502 See attachedi A. P.O:M76753 Respectfully submitted: V, Mihutes of DPAB meetingg m. c. IBM proposal of 12/9/Bb Lloyd Y. Harrell ' City Manager > area bys wNOW Tom Shaw Title! Asat. Purchasing Agent 1 1 Approved: n Aaw. John Marshall f' ° Titirl Purchisinrs Agent y S CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 901.8 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201 P.O. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYP 76733 01/0718T S11 ; II61002 •~ENDOR 11161002 SHIP TO: j•B~M• CITY OF DENTON• ATTN1 JEFF ZEIHM DATA PROCESSING 1603 LSJ FREEWAY 324-8 EAST MCKINNEY $T• 04LLAS• TX 76234 DENTON• TX 76201 BID/REP. r TIM ACCOUNT NUM161 UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UN1 AMOUNT E' 01 '100 036 0017 8802' 1 FOUR MEGABYTES OF MEMORY FOR 204000000 y 02 100.'036 6017 6502 THE IBM 4361 e ,r sYV 1 ° . r . 1 Y 3, ! H ~ t~, ' y3 he it of Denton Taxes Is lox exempt • NOYII Bill No. 10. :6Ietoooo 0.0. Number, on all i/01hipmente end Invoices s :hiptnents are 0.0,11, Clty of Denton,'*( is Indlcotod. e Hod loveless TO. Direct Inquiries TO: Ofty'of Denton, Aooounlo Payable John J. Menhelt, C.P.M. PurchslIn6 Agent . „,;1181. MaKlnney, 8t., Denton, TX 76201 Tom 0. Shaw, CAM. Met. Purohesln/ Abont (or to Indlested on Pu(cheel Order) 817/666.1211 O/FW Metro 261.0012 The City of Denton Is in equal opportunity employer r Y.r 'i,ll~.d~M.da.....we. ..........._..nr\.r^.+~dMM.a paYY:.,rc,. r r.. M. +.o-+aM+...wu ~..lr.. . ,,,,......:.n.....=..,.v . J, . ' i i I 6 I MINUTES CITY OF DENTON I DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD E DECEMBER 15, 1986 r. y MEMBERS PRESENTr Jim Kuykendall Dale Maddry Charles Riddens E P, MMERS ABSENTt Ron McDade A ; E OTHM PRESENTi Gary Collins John Marshall t., Tom Shaw Charles Riddeas made a motion that the minutes of the October 24, 1986 be 9 approved as written. Jim Kuykendall second the motion and :t pissed unanimously. Gary Collins explained, the Software packages being presented had been established as priority items by the Data Processing Steering Comsittee during the Budget Process and funds had been budgeted in this fiscal year for the acquisitions of s these packages. Tom Shaw discussed the inadequacies of the current inventory and Putchasing systems. John Marshall discussed needs of the Purchasing Division for more accurate and ' timely information than currently available. Dale Maddry 4. ,.asked what other resources would be needed to implement these packages. Gary 1R .ollins explained that an additional staff member had been budgeted to provide J `the necessary support in implamentation of these packages and that the City was currently trying to recruit an individual. In addition, Gary Collins explained ' that the request for an additional four megabytes of memory would be necessary s; to handle the increase processing, requirements of these systems as veil as correct the current response time problem. Charles Riddens made a motion that the Board recommend the City Council enter into an agreement with American Management Systems for the acquisition of the extended Purchasing and Inventory Systems. Jim Kuykendall second the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the Job Costing and Cost Allocation Systems would be the final Sub-system of an integrated Financial System and complement the 3 currently Installed LGFS Modules as well as the proposed extended Purchasing and inventor Sub-systems, In add Y addition, Cary Collins explained that the additional four megabytes of memory was needed to correct the current disk paging problem 4F~ as well As provide the needed resources for the extended Purchasing and Inventory Systems. Gary Collins suggested that the Board recommend to the City Council the acquisition of the Job Costing and Cost Allocation Sub-systems as well as the additional memory. The Board concurred with this suggestion. Tharis being no further business the meeting was adjourned. u. tw • Y t Inlorrutiond Business Machin" Cap, rsIW 1603 LBJ F 06"U TW>I Sm t1 NI6bS200 December 40 1986 Kr, Carp Collins City of Denton 324-3 1. McKinney w ' Denton, TX 16101 Dear Oarpt r As per our conversation, the coat of upgrading the City of Denton's 4361 from a model L03 to a modal NOS is $20,000. The modal upgrade incrisaoa the processor's rain memory from four megabytes to eight megabytes. M} The lead time for this memory upgrade will ba approximately eight to twelve weeks from the data that we receive the City of Denton's order. r^1 Please feel free to call me if you have any additional questions, Cordially, y(~' ' . l V 6' V ~ Jeff tiabia Marketing lepresantative f w rt r x J ,f W F° , ky;v r, , s. + 4• ' i ~ ''1 1RV7,3636~4.1 r r A %I F h~ . 'URREHIT ~tCPU MEASUREMENTS 4 bI-5 DOS/VSE . r , 3M' ,y ! ty Y ~ ~ Q r 40 b .I...,, ..w•.•............................... • Busv r+ r y ,E a ausv. ,a ig 7 tj tC~i13 aD/16 1~/~9 31/ 4 11/ 5 21/ ~ 11! 7 l ! MEASUREMENTS DATE l sgI ! XZMS9i CURRENT CPU MEASUREMENTS Thi: graph plots the daily average CPU 'ut'iI nation for each period maazurad,-along with the overall average and the CPU sat dasigo ~,nt, A~. Tna Y Axis unit i s X CPU0 It ba5lclly gives Moll a Quick pfCture of hOW much CPU rQsourco is left in that processor, t_ 'IK.A~~it"1T1»~!filwW~k:Y~.Si1a/G+~kw+~7t1.Nf~~~"w••sww~.w.,.aww...... „se r a { a f P I. x. a i I' C ► T Y OF DENT01-4 ' CURRENT PAGING ACTIVITY t 4361-5 DOS VSE x ,.~fl ^+1.y ;A, Mfr ,!a r 40 ? F YpA aF Y a'. d a /I yk~. f Jr +f.~.2 }.M`N 9~SP ~rhS ♦~~t drF wl M''n ~P ~A~k rsh'1~. l' ° ~Y If r+~ 41\'l`♦\A,7 1 d'ylld\\/`.\A{`\r 4T\ r~I! h~.}' 1 1'4' 11' 1" 1 IK.. w awrar+r;r rh~F. ♦ ~ar'~#{bai i~f ir`1'~r i`4~ h 1'`al: rywr','v?k•>~ r.~ M 30. `a I!4 JY 4 >A~a~:j"z`, a,+ a. 'a~ 0 4.4 ar"_%Nty WV Si.4a f 5 P fol.r ~i4.rA .,ra wt n'r f m«`Ie'~'v R, P}TrJrEy'f F' .wf7 r~ L•lvlgr i ) \ \ ,\A \ f! a~rrl >7 r rr~rr \~)'>},7 > ^sr\~~.71?\ , 1~}\•}C+,. 1 d~ ;142:f~v}`• 4 M'.4 }!d• To la ! ~ 1 f?M f~ d11 hlPh x,'14 S)a f! 9"Rr A T AR' ~4 y,+~ art }.}C}r~. i n5r`•~ird.J}rf i{,~4~~rr i4- ri)•d?d~k \rf .p ly.<" ^dafy 9 y,! trr\.4 f\ ♦ M r.\„\r»,, r r \ \ >>}7\r.~'~."}rs>. .Yir • 'edf<rrt,{~f~L`~dF'a4rt~d~r R2 frta4e'~rfiT`1~4:Gyf\i~'~f ,(life.e~.n`. +iarri'.h;? MI yh'?t r\! fi~y,'f, P 4Yf a~/SP `♦4V t}};PAIn,;P ~Sa e \!*l^!R"Oti ,ayy.\R} iC'hl"~ T`f;~}~r~i}r•,p' a. 2o- s` f T fi d.'.} r+'" r.al4lrLF rnr .",a) af , •..41.4,( af~~ f a`x". P?dj~.4.f' r d£1 AV ~ r\ry~♦~'~! '>>r~\f\r'Pf,'~'.♦r r\\r~}rrv'>!\ \ a~,}'\\T }r\~r lr r♦r♦ .♦,':'}'ti:}!`7'Y w'`1~1Q\•nr v, l~•S?~a :7}y~\*`}f, '~Y}I:+RT~'}•.ti `~r R~r-0:` an 7 a,'iI`wn.'!'f.tla d.wiladr?"d~.j!'\4'brl4 ¢?~ir ~a7p.yt A,~♦A~eT y':~\ 4',yt+~r`.~.n 'xP.y~'/~Fp•;L'~sa ,SrA,r » 0 \ ♦,rr'r 1''h ~,e r? iR\J\i~ ?`rr'r•~: F.lX:4d \»+T1yT 1^I'? !/i rf : }fyf 4 l.4. ~7~Y,.'r•~' }a AT' Pagi rd Fm» i 1,~ ` \'i' r rYY 4r\ 9+F.lN.y,,j{ ; ~•'I»y •m.4 F4m .a iM at•d 4 4 . r b'I4~~tif:, IjNmr ?r M•.f`i ~4 r~.k~w~.iry~a.~11..~~a7\ {~,~a,}41i9i ~iY~4.kA"I♦ 7a, ~~R~4A ~~?d.15~~?~~~F~~}Cj~,~f~~F.•y~y`y~+~'f}~~}`ryp,,r~y4,,'i~'dt~S~4 :.~d .eh~~4`(':d7gi YR V/nn /r.rlPh N~ +^d141+4}JrP~4 fl~fl ~~4 .T7R}..6R~~r7 r1a~b ~f9~i*~iSl\pr'a AP~e~~S.,r,);, T,. 7.^• "'/iS.G,"`,6`r]'.IT\b'W'nA~y!'fy7'„f~}JT.+'a i U' . 4 : l 4 1 r'} l: 1' s y\R}"~:~"+ ♦ 1 7. •}:r 1?,~: r . tia'. , ,~'~i J~ A } r) ~.;fz`~M: at'aif♦dt~ra?.~,+ ~ffi.r rdl'Ir Wit: `c~~Y•.4FKh .Y ri4 7t.d .,c r e J'a`.m}!~<nrr`"A e1i ~;~'~4•'E Crf:' TOT, SID 8 PAD. 10/ 7 to/ 8 10/13 10/1b 14/29 11/ 4 11/ 5 11/ b SID (MEASUREMENTS DATE e: XRCPG01 :CURRENT PAGING ACTIVITY ,t Plots the daily averago SIO/soc duQto paging ~t for each period measurQd, vs the total,SIO/sac, along with the ovarall averages. It gives you using a SURFACE chart ~ a visual rapres4ntation of the intensity of paging compared to the total workload SIO. 111'' 1/8b _ .+w.e sw;.Rylb,wM•A~rWSr-..,..~ »..:nw ...y,,,q,~ v ~ . ~...~.».._..._~~Gos`m++f:nir Rn:w aw',"%... w.~a11N1W.NMwefrle.la'~d' .wn~:'W.Aki4~l4rd»i'~¢.:.SIP/~i'~IlLL+i~iMll'~1wi'A~lfMl3'4W5 i A H' c< I ' e F t P,. c C T OF DE11TON i PERCENT PAGING ACTIVITY 4361-5 DOS'VSE I 03 Y 4-• ; w ~ ; in 5 yci ~ I~ I k '}~::ti r}t > `'°4}v' r 'f>> T`•~, >S j r"~.y~n^"'+y n.3:ri:G~>°'~~n , L~?~r~! r sys. 4 w~j'y~ ~ T ~ n4 y ~~~~''ri ~'~ti.r'~°, ~,'>j~~'A,.t~ w° . ~C . ~r. w :r ':'.s~Yr4 r~i:r a°>~n°.o-`:~.f ~.:..°y}!~'>k.:F:rvt:'`'r},C,f .F ~':?~:f G <r.+ ..i F ~i'^a«~'a}}f:F:i~',n''3}.'>. r,R>Y .°v,~,}4,7°~w~d :a'.}4. M. ;.1. w r. ti`\ A 1}, s:{r;T.}`~~.)~.}~. °l`.di`Ze}.'..}~.'P,>\``~S'}\Yti.yti}ti 4~f 1>-'')w'AF74r,A f~. ~•.}S\.\~}} iY~'?..1~~~~ a.F Pot g 0 f;•w~~rY~.~,{~..} i R a 1•l...F :E S~ f hfi. .ti r k .Cf ~~~TrYinr 3 A~'b R. .?~N~Arr~Sl. •n'.T~ ® , r p&q f x 10/ 7 10/ 3 10/1' 10116 10/29 11i' 4 11t, 5 11/ 6 11/ 7 MEASUREM° NTS HATE r , vRCPG0 2 vR!bts (SU,CUR X due RFACE)) tha dai t'y aver~ageY! SIO to paging for'oacn pQr1od measured, along with the ovcralt average, Ifth+? l,~ter is above 1'03., it usually indicates unsuff i c i ent 1,i2MORY res our co capac i ty for the WKLD :~11/I1/ 8b Q r~ ' y ' t7 r p. ;e c t t CITY OF DE11TOr1 ' PROJECTED PAGING AND TOTAL SIO Assuming 100 1% Meni increase 43b1-5 VM/VSE ~ w! \\\F `.\•}*>wa`,4 Ewa \ a?\ \ T i { l 9? P R.i•'S 4 O,,P i s r' f y~y .f,< f vv} w y.rt'Y r r\ ♦ y}t h~ 4~: ' a\ \ \P \ wY, A\r. T +JwA ¢ 4 fat Sa.P a\<yf aw!?Y Y F LV ~r \ 4 a w \>'\'r rll` \v ti>\ p\\v\ T\L~r.'\\v, ra 1"I Yv a Y'\\ t r` > \L }?\Pr t'^+ro`nx 'Y'w`~ rG a F r 6 r {t a a r r 4 .a 4> tr m 4.4 a a> qa c . .r \ \+V \l,}V1\\a„w\w f.. 1 wy,4vv>v vYww} \,•.\\y\,r k0'~+". !*6aC S.4•?c < as 4 S .a ~ arS .aa ro f.n ~r.~F e'a%a•p>~ 4 of 4.6 n .d .d, TotaI T{A°~ tr~ ♦ v. Y}?! "fv. s\ S \ a ~ 4 v > ` v!, \ \ a! > D Av s\s}t Y~ "yin v Pi'0 W r!i}.~\! ~ a ad{> {i f { $2tr Orr a•n ~m ~ti ~ f v w1».\\w{a a rrwy } dr}\w }C "}'~,'~yy\•~l;}j ! .~\'t'~'F+.~ j"~.y Yr ~rG Y{fA l A i 4~~r +6 r•.a < Tlr / P< A ~$.i7 '.{.~P•5 wi~A' ~_~^r. F .i•. /~~)G 4F ~4%~y~•>'\a+aar., I,^r:~+ra~b ~~~\,'~6~~>:'.?\~f\\\Y*rt\y\\wra.'n~ i'1r `}!~}?}8~raawl a`r~ jG~> S`i\•.+,y! T. ~iY ?4j, } ? \7',y ~-y as 4 { ~ r, w.F,r•.r\r .b,?.`:<~}`ii`•~\>.vwb .f\P\ f•'~r reti;~\. P\~' awf .n~~~w4~1 .F~a.?~d I!'A'~wf,6 h~ri\ w`\.¢\ ~~\~•}i\nw4 a.af ^ b a'' .}~i .\<:i\,`~ nfi'+. +,''!'}'.S•:{`:/.~T'}r f`.'fia•{.'3 i2 ~ma 6,a 'a??fi r: >,.,~\4; :'Sf•:,r 'r}'} .Fin a~r\'a F i)Ma'n<'d,\L•+'.'T`?,{; `?4.a41~` .>,A)SyPli?T~'y e'iF~., }~F pag i ng H `;;'}`?R4'~~~!Y!^};,`4~ ~7A~''•.F'.+•;5.;>~?p~i>i~~`,'r'`~i\` ~l,:,t\~!•2y~r\:t`'~,}~.e .m\rr 3.<~i+:tsiayt<}^r`,l~,`~'.~14::~~+Pa},~f~,lY~\~,,\~~,i.~,:~`,.F\a 4,\,ar~1 'fp>,>~,~{fi,..; ' (f')' 10 rw.rt.~a•k aa~,aqq'..~~ a, L 3• c r•r a?,;•?,"------ a'i.•,i''~r..c }3'r !{rFi"4~ra~{ a ~'•jr',~ s r.~"r`s' ,i"~{~..Yfr•.!`yi?':{ y,' Y};rY•%& ~t~'a'd' ~v<r' YY°asb•, .arrt e>X P, 6arF ~f rF> f.Ff d.~`,~a'i$4At*a } \a+y~ y~`~~\♦ r\\\ ♦ ! ,w.. ♦ y ~\y\\h \`\wrwy,a`1\ r r+.~.}lrr}~F?.F.'•rr ! , of ~~haa•.s6 at'7a' { ^\,!ma ns'•.i?ar ti` v s m~.Yi~s< :f i4,,F .a•.s ,a• r•, a F, r..•i<Y~~¢~rE,aF'~.d :f 669'}~• .v ,~.~.~y: ~ r~, S' ^r~a,`•.'~'.{1.+~''•t`'ri>at~`4rw'!d!\~.a\':}~,i6lii Awy ~~'ro`?a~'raN}.i\\~: .y~ wo,.3\.!•~.~fyr\.3~(~~}~~Y\}.o:~'+}\;l'b)};.<,\)}}~~*ly}' ~wa±~':?)?es4~a?,:.Y f\ ra:6 sk Ate,>,\Y~` {\F..?>;?`,.}`i\w+P,">`4}!.,>+. +r.\w.r'+et•wl,~,>\r, . •;>~,.:?\!>j )r'1. } `\}~\!w \ *a , y}?T}><,Rr}'~\?f•C•'`"'•J Sio w.fi ~6 ~hF f6 s• .64.>+a ,a P6r~ ?~a ~r 6 Aa$.a. R•.6}n;c~;,G}.r,y?~,~1 r T`,~ ,f> 'tl•F\,a~Y\,f ?s •Y, Paainq 10/ 7 10/ 8 10/13 10/1b 10/29 11/ 4 11/ 5 11/ b 11/ 7 STO MEASUREMENTS DATE XRCPG0b !PROJECTED PAGING ACTIVITY k; Assuming an inoraase of x 3; in the amount of main mo_mort~4 'lots the expected SIO/s due 'to paging for each similar ~ l' period assuming the workload stays the same. r 11,,11/36 r ~ i • w s t' i 3 r yti - E %I T Y OF DENTOki if Us DASD RESOURCES INDEPENDENT CAPACITY DASD LIKELY ix MAXIMUM VALUES ~ r - - - - - =r;, v w f W W 44 r \ i ys ...`1.................................. ~ DASQ LIY,L 2 ;3615 AVG SIo t f lo/ 7 io/ a W/13 10/16 10/23 1l/ 4 ll/ 5 11/ 6 11/ 7 1 XRCBTD2. :CPU 41DrDASD 5 U ES-IUE ENDENT CAPACITY bA5D LIKE_Y,VALUE AND MAXIMUM SjO's/sa_q arid' Nb SIo are the amount of work current lu dons, as rbported' bkt the noun i for for the period. The CPU tine re~►resents the'pntantial saturation point of the CPU resource if corisid& ed ' ind penr.er~tty, The DASD tines represent the tikely/max 1-klork:load dled by the. present configura#ion. This chart tel(s r . tii:it ca,n be han you which. resource Sou wi ll exceed first or if you are LmdGr- i y corifiqured. , F t i (L ji f 5.+... M. M'J1f'..•nN.Fxw y.. i. - . i...!. i t Win.. ' C TTY OF DENTON CPU, PATH RESOURCES INDEPENDENT CAPACITY € F PATH LIKELY VALUE is 100 j G F; N b Ld NTH ~.,~:~L . I + a 361-5 I rn 20- tr W 7 1©/ 8 19/13 10/16 10/23 11/ 4 It/ 5 11/ b W 7 i 5y OMP XR(BTP1 CPU PND PATH S U C h ENDENT CAPACITY PATH'LIKELY VALUE ! ` SIO's/sec and AVG SIO are 'the amount of work currently done, as rdportod by the monitor for the period. The CPU line represents the potential saturation point of the CPU resource if considered j independenfivo The PATH line represents the likely workload that ~ an be handled ► the presQnt cone1guration. This chart tells you which resource you will bxc•ead first or if you are vnd4r'- configured, 41 r A n J c S~. C I T Y OF DENTON i CPU) DASD ~ PATH RESOURCES INDEPENDENT CAPACITY j LIKELY VALUES . ! v N y , PATH L I K L r . . DASD LIKL o w. A'r G Sii? n 0 S0/sea @! 7 19! 6 10/13 10/ib 10/29 11/ 4 11/- 5 111b 11/ 7 XRCATLI : CPU, DASD Tai S INDEPENDENT CAPACITY t LIKELY VA! UE'S '310 's/sec arid:AVG'-SI0 are the amount of work currently done, as` r4bort4d by the monitor for the period. The CPU line represents ; the potential saturation point of the CPU resource if considuc-& indapd)ident t U. The DASD line represents the like workload j . that can be' handled byy the present configuration. Simi lair lu for t the PATH line. This chart to l is iota tilh ich resource y6u wi l l t exceed first or if you are under-configured. wraa'~r.rasi►csw~gigt. ARra ,i J C' . ~ I k< r irw~1}N.o:.r r•srr`.f'rv+P n4 ~.t..:.,. . • SYSTEM WORKLOAD VARIABLE GROWTH RATE FORECAST 4361-5 PT-DATA 5Q • i 40 40 x` 30 30) 3rd firth ~f, t- toener i o F -S JO k m~ .!}a Asp 2nd fir the scenario. 1` C►_' c© c~ f~\ 1st firth' c r~ 20 nQnar j o a, IL JIL 17 Qr i 4r 2 mr 3 DATES tit. P'i 11 I r P a: a- A ft 1 f~?' Ali 7t T Y uF DEMTON WORKLOAD FORECASTED GROWTH (in CPU unit3) 1 ' VS PROJECTED CPU t1AXF,'1UM CAPACITY t 1411 ! i 120 s ,z s } ~f 18~-j ~ - - Iadvx "?Us w " s ± f s lli r j bT f, d f r} w y w t 40 w fy'• ' I. -r~,."^ f ~ f } , wf } T r ~.~.T} ~ L.}..±. t }:}:},.'?:}:}'%.t~'}';t'•'?'}~%}~:: w~}~}~. 1 t5\ ti t t,. ':r" •f.,:i:. •~',f%r': ''r ~'t•: r's'} i'}':} •:}:>:%}}:.~i;}~}''•r}:w d w •j}:. :.i pp Y~ 11;87 11/$8 1''f89 41.'86 First growth scenario. 11'14%~b ~ •-y •T sr V t - u i i y;< 3 , {tTy4wF . ~ 't q: C iT Y UE UENTUI'S! i WORKLOAD FORECASTED GROWTH (i n CPU units) VS PROJECTED CPU MAXIMUM CAPACITY ! / 12 is Todys C'u; Lw 6a-I ! OT-rATA 1 y:! L ~~IT h h ' 0 ~ ~ .~r.rr ~~~-•••r M1 yy n yM1 ; • t", -d'p~~ K.•<aa••' :'~K~{:{h•:•• ,:'f}:4 .•Y'~o'F'}}•SasJ•:S:S.r..•..•.~.}.}73:}:}:'Y:?; r.f:}.:. .•.5.;:{ ••,;:J:/•: •Y Y:• •:n•y✓n:• r,• rte!', ',t• "S: r•1:. •~M1: ''1' :•M1 . X555•::::•hh :Y• .`5• 5:55• ,5}'. •.5 {ry:. i 11'86 11!67 11/88 1-r$° r: 1 ~aaond growth soanario. ' ! . , dy4. 4i 1 r Y . 4 u : P. .5 F4 ~ j-. G i:, • L! i i OF D E r+j ! oj\j c i WICIR11.10A D FORECASTED GROWTH (in CPU units) `a PROJECTED CPU i+ AXIMUf"1 CAPACITY i 140E i y 3 ^+F 120- , { I CL C 1LI0- t ~f.;31-1_ i ! f,7 ~Y t 5Jti5 511• }M1 M15,S1M1,+t,a +)yjr 1 yr, .r} 1' ••'tit ti+•r •1 5 r } } } 1 .r.. {tip. ;ti:, y`, ~ 1 r'I'• • ~l 1'1 I y i r. • ~ 1 1 '67 11/88 11 8° Third growth smarid. r, is s; f} t :k , .ro 1669L L~ ) } NO. I AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING A SCHOOL SAFETY SPEED ZONE ON PAISLEY DRIVE FROM A POINT APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET WEST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH MACK DRIVE TO A POINT 130 FEET EAST OF ? MACK DRIVE; AND ON MACK DRIVE FROM THE SOUTHERN CURB LINE OF ITS ' INTERSECTION WITH LEE DRIVE TO THE SOUTHERN CURB LINE OF DOUBLE OAK STREET AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH MACK DRIVE; REDUCING THE MAXIMUM PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT FROM THIRTY (30) TO TWENTY (20) r MILES PER HOUR; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. Based upon an engineering and traffic investigation, the City Council hereby designates and establishes a school zone on Paisley Drive from a point approximately 200 feet west of its intersection with Mack Drive to a point 130 feet east of Mack Drive; and on Mack Drive from the southern curb line of its intersection with Lee Drive to, the southern curb line bf Double Oak Street. at its intersection with Mack Drive; and hereby determines that the reasonable and safe maximum prima facie speed limit on said portions of Paisley Drive and Mack Drive is twenty (20) miles per hour when school is in session between the hours of 7,30.9:00 A.M. and 2:30-4:00 P.M. kr. SECTION II ' When signs are erected giving notice thereof and when school is in session at the Robert E. Lee Elementary School, the reasonable and safe maximum prima facie speed limit on said portions of Paisley Drive and Mack Drive shall be reduced from thlrty (30) to twenty (20) miles per hour. SECTION III. , An individual adjudged guilty of exceeding this speed limit, , 4F, when signs are erected giving notice thereof, shall be guilty of " a misdemeanor, and punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) l j t ' T SECTION 1V. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof a to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the f validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the iF. City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. kt SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be t published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1967. RAY E N , MAYOR i CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS ~•b, ATTEST: I CHURTTE C, ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS E APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON,' TEXAS r BY: _ 0 i ".4 Y PAGE 2 i t M e r i ' I I i a'. CITY of piN'iON / 2f 5 f. McKinney / Denton, Texas 7620E 1 f MEMORANDUM October 28, 1986 DATE. TO: CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION Traffic Engineer Associate FROM: Paul Iwuchukwu, i, ' SUBJECT: School Zoning for Robert E. Lee Elementary School ordinances could not be found regarding the school speed zoning and related signs at Robert .Lee School. The following is k:. recommended for approval by the commission ° SChool speed limit signs; a, at southwest corner of Mack Place g Lee Drive b, at Paisley Drive, 200 feet west of Mack Drive, south side ` c. at northeast corner of Mack Drive I Doubleoak School crossinj; a. at south neck of Mack Drive @ Paisley Drive b. 'at west neck of Mack Drive I Paisley Drive C, at south neck of Audra Lane 0 Paisley Drive + d. at west neck of Audra Lane I Paisley Drive NOTE: Crosswalks shall be 10 foot wide ~G .M1 School_crossin_, Sdens; , A. School crossing siggns shall be posted at every crosswalk except where there Is a stop sign Advance warning signs for school crossings; a,` Advance warning signs shall be posted ISO feet (min) to 700 ,14° feet before crosswalks Normal speed limit signs; a, 30 mph speed, limit signs shall be posted at the end of school zone '(all approaches) 0424E " ,311 - r ~~r a .a r page 4 of 9 NOTE: School crosswalks shall.%be 10-fout wide School trussing signs; a. One sign in each direction at every crosswalk except where there is a stop sign f b. Advance warning signs for school crossing to be placed ISO feat W n) to 700 feet before ° crosswalks or series of crosswalks. d. "Nu Parking during school hour" signs; a a, On Crescent from Bryan to Fulton ' b. On Linden from Bryan to Fulton rM e . c. On Fulton from Panhandle to Crescent d. Resume normal speed limit signs; a. 30 mph speed limit signs shall be posted at the end of school zone (all approaches) Doris Chiked if these were any different than they had Mn. beaJerry Clark said there was no majur changes except advance warning signs would be erected in all directions and resume speed signs would be installed. Bruce Chamberlain asked if the ordinance would eliminate any parking. Paul said it would not. t n STAFF RECOMMENDED: Approval d, gar COMMISSIONERS: Bruce Chamberlain made a motion to accept the staff recommendation as stated. Vivian Edwards seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ITEM 44 SCHOOL ZONING FOR ROBERT E. LEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said, an ordinance could not be found regarding school speed zoning and related signs at Robert E. Lead The following was recommended to the commission for approval: . School speed limit signs, a. at southwest corner of Mack Place I Lee Drive ' qtA b. at Paisley Drive, 200 feet west of Mack Drive, South side c. at northeast corner of Mack Drive I Doubleuak School crossing; , R f. Ggl j page 5 of 9 i f a, st south neck of Mack Dri~e 0 Paisley Drive it b. at west neck of Mack Drive @ Paisley Drive c. at south neck of Au1ra Lane @ Paisley Drive d. et west neck of Audra Lane I Paisley Drive NOTE: Crusrtwalks shall be 10 fout wide School crossing signs; a. One sign in each direction at every crossw+:lk 6'. except where there is a stop sign Advance warning signs for school crossings; a. Advance warning signs shall be posted 150 feet (min) to 700 feet before crosswalks ` Normal speed limit signs; a. 30 mph speed licit signs shall be posted at the :nd of school tone (all approaches) " Pat Silver, maintenance supervisor at Apple Creek Apartments, came forward to address the commission concerning a possible school crossing at 1610 E. McKinney. Mr. Silver said, he has escorted children across McKinney street that go to Robert E. Lee ,q School many times. The traffic on East McKinney was extremely bad in the mornings. Paul Iwuchukwu said, McKinney was a Major thoroughfare and would have to be widened to a four lane highway. Paul said, they might want to consider busingg. Jerry Clark said, the school could possibly r consider picking those children up at the apartment. ` Gilbert Bernstein said, that was not possible because the apartments were within 2.5 miles of the school. STAFF RECOMMENDED: Approval ,err' C01MISSIONERS: Virginia Gallian made a motion to accept the staff's recommendation concerning the signs, crosswalks etc. In addition, Ms. Galltan asked the staff to see what alternatives were available to help those children at McKinney to find a yossible alternate. Vivian Edw;.rds seconded the w*K~ motion. Motion passed unanimously. ITEM 15 CONTROL SIGN AT DUNES AND OLD ORCHARD ROAD; ' Joe Thompson, Traffic Foreman, came forward and ' addressed the commission. He said there has been several; complaints about near misses at this I 1 % J r'. tlT I,f ' • ..w.ar~AM '.ax r.Y:»r... M,.i=:+ sra:r a.tr94r~. t N' O N $21 13 ° 13 ,a„ 2 ro 1e',rr i6 18 i` .q 12 l s,! 14 r r is a 24 x-'10 ii $ fl : .28 ` LEE pnlVi Qnlo 4. ~ ti° 'bb Q 0.1r I~ q y uo 8 ' 23 06 Q a'' 1 ~2 i3 °s..6 , r , • ' 10, f 8 ~ a 22 1 , F fs s ,`i7 11 319 3r 7 ft 21 Q I Q 2 j p• n tt XCY b ` 1Q f1 1 y 13. 14 t• o4oorY 000 AM i A PEOMMIAN X-IN0 30 NM ro ,oa' le•SCNOM tONC SON. A18L pq{EDE lgNYAI ~ •0' t0' t0' b' My' ~ ~ 's, ~ ~ ~ 8 C1 4.1 ! 1 i 2 3 4 r 3: 6 7 100 an, 4a' t0.0,' t0 a' , R N Its* y 14T 3 34, s" 3.3 3 34 e 33 no t$' r!a ' !4{.i 32- 3! 30 29 l++ 187 a 11 t1' g 't S 28 ~ Sc TOME %j nMl t . 27 {IG! times, fin 1 12 11 • s I, „ • RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION OF "CHARLOTTE ALLEN" WHEREAS, the City of Denton is losing one of its most valued employees, Charlotte Allen, who began her employment with the City on September 11, 1980 as Administrative Secretary to the City Manager and was appointed City Secretary on February 1, 1982; and WHEREAS, Charlotte Allen has exhibited outst~oiding expertise, and has dedicated much of her time and effort in assisting the citizens of Denton; and WHEREAS, in addition to her rule as City Secretary, Charlotte is the mother of three wonderful sons: John, David and Clint, Clint being exposed to the trials and tribulations of a City Secretary on his third day in this world, when the City Manager's Office staff took work to Charlotte while she was recuperating from Clint's birth; and WHEREAS since 1982, Charlotte has assisted and served everyy Council member of the City of Denton and her reputation is sucA that Council members and staff of other cities call upon her from time to time for advice as well; and WHEREAS, Charlotte's sense of humor is well-known throughout City Hall, a requisite trait to holding eight elections and preparing some four hundred and fifty City Council agendas; and WHEREAS, Charlotte Allen has always served above and beyond the mere efficient discharge of her duties and has earned the full respect and admiration of the Council, staff, and boards and x commissions; a NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF h' DENTON, TEXAS: That the Council of the City of Denton, acting on behalf of the citizens and staff, wishes to acknowledge with grateful apppreciation the services of Charlotte Allen, and the devotion she has given to the City of Denton, and order that this x Resolution be made a part of the official minutes of the City, - and that a copy be presented to her as an expression of our 1#~ sincere appreciation, 1R,- PASSED AND APPROVED this the 20th day of January, 1987. I RAY r r ~ MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I "r 4. 1 ~ i i L L , ARK R. CH£Yf, CON ILMEM R jr . ra , COUNU y S -EMCILMEMBER r 7Tt A APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS ' CITY SECRETARY CITY ATTORNEY A• ;l A ii `to R Y 'Y C, L: s~~s C t DATES 1/20/87 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 3 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMI Lloyd Harrell, City Manager ;j SUBJECTS Resolution for Intensity Allocation (First Come, First Serve) ,r. RECOMMENDATION. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval by a' vote of 6-0. SUMMARY AND BACIGROUNDS The Denton Development Guide contains provisions for dividing the city into numerous areas based on intensity or the amount of traffic generated. The low and moderate areas ate allo- cated a maximum number of vehicular trips rer day. The current policies of the Guide allow an individual to propose r land uses that use all the intensity in a specific area. All areas of the City presently in low or moderate areas under intensity stan- < dards would be subject to this policy. The policy created by this resolution would not eliminate first come zoning entirely but would provide the Planning and Zoning commission and council with criteria to review when making a land use decision. The staff will inform the petitioner of a zoning request that they ,'•a are only permitted an intensity allotment equal to the percentage of land owned by the petitioner (e.g. a petitioner owning 160 acres of a 640 acre low intensity would be entitled to 12,000 trips per day or 1/4 of the intensity allotment). Attached is a step by step analysis of an approved planned develop- ant that would have required additional review based on this policy. x PROGRAMS] DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS WECiEDs All departments involved in the devel- opment process and individuals zoning property. " FISCAL IMPACTS No impact can be determined at this ime "S Res fully /ub eds Llo Harrell 'a City Manager Prepared bys } a Cecile Carson 41, urban Planner Appro di Jeff Meye I% Director of Planning r ' and Development S~`. j U.1{n.~gyS.,x. ~a.~. aava.w,+Ucu.:am`.erMn<sR<.V:n r.r.r -a. :u:., lr•~w :,.o., ........w.w1Yp . ~ t v. r, >S; tia [r F 1635L R E S O L U T I O N } WHEREAS, the Denton Development Guide 1985, as amended, was adopted as the official compre ens ve p ann ng guide for the City to be used in making decisions in planning, development and land use; and WHEREAS, the Guide divides the City into high, moderate and low intensity plann ng areas to insure the goal of balanced growth; and WHEREAS, the guide fails to provide a specific policy for the allocation of trip generation intensity within the respective planning areas; and WHEREAS, the City Council, upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, has determined that a policy providing for the allocation of trip generation intensity within the respective planning areas established by the Guide would be Y: useful in the planning process; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS: SECTION I. s' € That the Development Policies of section III, E, 49 b, of the Denton Ilevelo went Guide 1985, as amended, be further amended to rea a's o ows: b. Land Use Intensity/Transportation Balance 1} General Policy and Standards (a) To promote the goal of balanced growth between land use and transportation systems, the City is divided into high, moderate, and low intensity planning areas. (See map on page 23) For plan- Wing purposes, the moderate and lox intensity it planning areas have maximum trip generation standards, A moderate intensity area can have a maximum of 250 vehicular trips per day, per gross acre. A low intensity area can have a maximum of 7S vehicular trips high intensity a ea has noyestabllshed limit, The (b} As a general planning policy, a specific development should o.ily make use of ' a proportionate share the trip generation intensity allocates for the Intensity planning P; area affected, based upon 'the ratio of the acreage of the proposed development to the 1 Y t i I acreage contained within the intensity planning area in which the de: topment is located, Theref= , to q ply the general policy in making a zoning decisi that affects a low or moderate intensity planning area, the Eo ring would be considered: i) What is the tripp generation standard for the planning area? ie-g. if the area is 640 acres and it is a low intensity area, then the maximum trips would be lS T.P.D. x 640 ac, or 48,000 T.P.D.) li) How much trip generation Intensity has already been used by existing development and zoning in the planning area? Iii) How much trip generation intensity is allocated to the proposed development under the general policy? (e.g. a 160 acre specific development in a 640 acre low intensity planning area would be allocated 12,000 trips per day, which is 1/4 of the allotment for the entire area). iv) How much trip generation intensity is to be used by the proposed development? Y) Now much trip generation Intensity will remain In the planning area if the proposed zoning request is granted? ` If the proposed development does not violate the general of intensity allocation, the request would be evaluated liin reference to other policies of the Guide. (c) If a specific request violates the general policy of ' proportionate allocation a determination should then e made whether there are planning considerations that would warrant approval of a disproportionate allo- cation of trip generation intensity. Those consid- orations may include, but are not limited to, the followings x i) the location of the proposed development in reference to existing or ro osed pub lac a facilities, such as streets, water or sewer lines, and drainage facilities. In this regard, 4 the City's Mastor Plan for public facilities should be considered, it may be found to be more A desirable, for example, to allocate more trip 1 '+r generation intensity to a proposed development that Is adjacent to, or would have convenient Page 2 .ro s '~iXIW+".. ,:,.•N+'-.s.:.. .F4iA Y+a x.+r S{tinyi to : +'„n +'N+ti'~ e r r y facces to aress major xwater gand sewers lines major tdrainage E. faculties. 8 It) The topography of the land in the planning area and the proposed development. There may be " reason to allocate less trip generation intensity for a specific property that would otherwise require major modification of natural drainage F areas the removal of large masses of trees the leveling of hills, and other major topographical modifications to develop. iii) The land use in the planning area and surrounding areas. The proposal should be reviewed to determine the compatibility with existing and potential land uses in the area and surrounding t area. Iv) The allocation of tri g" reference to other p generation intensity in policies ` as, the protection of older of netthe ghbo-rias sand r' single family housing; diversity of housing; and the concentration of apartments and office/retail r sites. Y " (d) In specific areas where a disproportionate allocation A of Intensity has been rosed development will be evaluated ainedreference pt o the least Intenset most logical land use for roet In the area. In addition, the effect on the su rounding planning areas and compatibility with other of the §uide should be reviewed. Policies SECTION II. rY i That this resolution shall become effective Immediately upon Its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1986. CITY Of DiNTONa TEXAS Page 3 ~ r ..e'c Mrs' t a c n ATTEST: T CITY OF DEN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOYITCH, CITY ATTORNEY , CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 4 BY: ` /i 1Aa F i 4 i,.. 1 11 ~i I M1 WW ryi a. ).gym ~ A Page 4 P i t w .,;.:..ypyWW4^ru"Wa~IhJ+tt+lua:pq.1P.6NharhwA'VI+u,...•,,.. ._....,,.,,ar.abT.-~Q~,. i r a a r ,r, F k December 3, 1986 Page 5 C• RESOLUTION REGARDING rst serve INTENSITY ALLOCA7i0N (first come, STAFF REPORT;; Als, oPPortun ty to look Cats hestated that this is the final ' has taken the two documents that were reviewed She said that staff by their last discussi of Commission In . the first come~ r first serve policy and coa.bined on is to be Incorporated Into them, She said that this been changed, the Guide so the format has DECISION: Mr, Escue coved to recommend a p firs ut on regarding intensity allocatlar:r(~lrsl Loathe first serve). Seconded b unanimously carried (6.0). r' Claiborne and motion e' rt• r . pp+i~VF~ k Wl ~ ~ - t' f 1 ~t t l° q + rl, u{kt~i ~'.'i r4 I i STUDY Uu. Zoning Request: 75 acres northeast corner of I11-35 Service Road and E~ Payne Drive. Land Uses: Office - 16.75 ac, Neighborhood Service - 4.00 ac, ` ff(( Cluster Housing - 18.34 acres, Single family-10 - 27.74 ac, Single Family-16 - 6.00 ac, Park - 2.17 ac General Policy; ~w 1. What is the trip generation standard for the planning area? 491 acres x 75 td/ac - 36,82S trips „ 2, How much trip generation intensity has already been used by existing development and zoning in the planning area? 14,847 trips 3. How much trip generation intensity is allocated to the proposed development under the general policy? 5,625 trips 4. How much trip generation intensity is to be used by the proposed development? 11,739 trips S. How much trip ggeneration intensity will remain in the planning area if the proposed zoning request is granted? 10,238 trips s~a4w Specific Policy: " 1. The location of the proposed development in reference to existing or proposed public facilities, such as streets, ` water or sewer lines, and drainage facilities. In this regard, the City's Master Plan for public facilities should be considered. Payne Drive is a secondary major arterial but is not constructed across the frontage of this property. Major utility extensions will be necessary. A major drainage system from the west and north will be needed, 2. The topography of the land in the planning area and the proposed development. There may be reason to allocate less trip generation intensity for a specific property that would otherwise require major modification of natural drainage areas, the removal of large masses of trees, the leveling of hills, and other major topographical modifications to f develop. r` .1 dr ~f d wi , 4 ti ~t k e Study January 14, 1987 Page 1 z` The topography of the land does not present any special reasons for modification except a major detention pond will be necessary as the drainage pattern is altered. 3. The land use in the planning area and surrounding areas. The proposal whould be reviewed to determine the compatibility with existing and potential land uses in the area and sur- rounding area. The property is locates {.n a low intensity area. The surrounding land uses are predominately residential. A neighborhood service area is located less than a 1/2 mile s south of this property approximately 4 acres in size. 4. The allocation of trip generation intensity in reference to other policies of the Guide, such as, the protection of older neighborhoods and single family housing; diversity of hous- ing; and the concentration of apartments and office/retail sites. The proposal violates numerous Development Guide policies s including concentration of non-residential uses in low L intensity areas and trip commercialization of thoroughfare. Conclusion, The propposal exceeds its allocated amount of intensity by + . kw 1081. the inclusion of the office and neighborhood service land uses which are policy violations causes this problem. Becaust of the property's location, allocatioi in excess of their proportionate share might be permitted but this high a percentage limits the development of the surrounding property.. 4; ' r n A; k 'Y h ~ ' rt rh r •j +9 1 r ~ , a r~ ski; l ~ ' ,n, w,.,W w., .wa.ara4R: Wb'aV.71-+'P.xoi irN::aast 7+KSa aw.~;w.•.«.:... r.v~k~Tn~ e F r ft e 1691L RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Denton owns property available for lease at the Denton Municipal Airport; and WHEREAS, Port-A-Port, Incorporated, a Texas corporation, desires to lease property at the Denton Municipal Airport and to use the sane for hangar construction, hangar rental and related aeronautical purposes; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires to lease property upon the Airport for such purposes; and WHEREAS, the Airport Advisory Board has reviewed and recommended approval of the attached proposed lease agreement; ,R NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. i That the Airport Lease Agreement between the City of Dentod~',•• and Port-A-Port, Incorporated, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved. FE'S SECTION II. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the attached lease agreement on behalf of the City. SECTION III. That this Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its ax' 1 ` passage and approval. ' PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS a, ATTEST. r ! CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHs CITY ATTORNEY r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS t' By I!4 ' V a 4, r r II f a 1691L THE STATE OF TEXAS S AIRPORT LEASE AGREEMENT LAND LEASE COUNTY OF DENTON 4 This lease, is made and executed this day of , 1987, at Denton, Texas by and between-- 19870 City of Denton, a Municipt.l Corporation, Lereinafter referred to as "Lessor", and Port-A-Port, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas having its principal offices at Route 1, Box 14-K, South Ray,ada~~Drive, Paso Robles, California 93446 hereinafter referred to as Lessee" v rF LG , , k4ra WITNESSETH: r WHEREAS, Lessor now owns, controls and operates the Municipal 4 Airport (Airport) in the City of Denton, County of Denton, State of Texas; and WHEREASs Lessee desires to lease certain premises on said airport and construct and maintain an aircraft hangar and related aviation facilities thereon; and NOW9 THEREFOREt In consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties agree r'' ra as follows. 1. CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT s` NOTWITHSTANDING ANY LANGUAGE TO THE CONTRARY HEREINAFTER CON- TAINED, THE LANGUAGE IN PARAGRAPHS A THROUGH D OF THIS SECTION SHALL B! 1INDING. !Vw x" s A. Principles of Operations The right to conduct aeronautical activities for furnishing services to the public is granted the Lessee subject to Lessee agreeing{ 1, To furnish said services on a fair, equal and not un- justly discriminatory basis to all users thereof, and CVs 2. To charge fair, reasonable and not unjustly discrimina- tory prices for eaci. unit or service; provided, that the Lessee may be allowed to make reasonable and non- S` discriminAtory discounts, rebates, or ocher similar i' types of price reductions to volume purchasers. ,s r t n..t~sr..:....,. . +.xy..d: g:•lRgv.l'.. . «r... n w ..,e, .e..r ar, y,ae=':o?311W7) 5 i 1 ( v5 B. Non-Discrimination The Lessee, for himself, his personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the conside- ration hereof does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that: 1. No person on the grounds of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin shall be oxcluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, 2. In the construction of any improvements on, over, or under such land and the furnishing of services thereon, no person on the grounds of race, religion, color, sex, or national origin shall be excluded from participation ` in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected i' to discrimination; 3. The Lessee, shall use the premises in complianco with all other requirements imposed by or pursuent to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Trans- portation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation-Effectual of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 19640 and as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above non- discriminatory covenants, Lessor shall have the right to terminate the Lease and to reenter and repossess said land and the facil- ities thereon, and hold the some as if said Lease had never been made or issued. This provision does not become effective until the procedures of 49 CFR Part 21 are followed and completed, including expiration of appeal rights, t C. Risht of Individuals to Maintain Aircraft It is clearly understood by the Lessee that no right or privilege has been granted which would operate to prevent any r person, firm or corporation operating aircraft on t.e airport from perforsir.:g any services on its own aircraft with its own regular employees (including, but not limited to, maintenance and repair) that it may choose to perform. J r D, Non-Exclusive Right_ It is understood and agreed that nothing herein contained shall be construed to grant or authorize the granting of an exclusive right within the meaning of Section 1349 of Title 43, U,S,C.A, f PAGE 2 I - r Vy y f f k E 1 k E, Public Areas 1. Lessor reserves the right to further develop or improve the landing area of the airport as it sees fit, regard- less of the desires or views of the Lessee, and without interference or hindrance. 2. Lessor shall be obligated to maintain and keep in repair the landing area of the airport and all publicly owned facilities of the airpport, together with the right to direct and control all activities of Lessee in this regard. 3. During time of war or national emergency, Lessor shall have the right to lease the landing area or any part thereof to the United States Government for military or naval use and, if such lease is executed, the pro- v1sions el this instrument insofar as they are incon- sistent with the provisions of the lease to the Government, shall be suspended. ` 4. Lessor reserves the right to take any action it con- siders necessary to protect the aerial approaches of the airport against obstruction, together with the right to prevent Lessee from erecting, or permitting to opinion of the edjaeentteto they airportnwhich, oInethe structure Lessor, would limit the usefulness or safety of the "j airport or constitute a hazard to aircraft or to aircraft navigation. S, This Lease shall be subordinate to the provisions of ,y. any existing or future agreement between Lessor and the United States or agency thereof, relative to the opera- tion or maintenance of the Airport. M H. LEASED PREMISES Lessor for and in consideration of the covenants and agree- ments herein contained to be kept by Lessee, does hereby demise and lease unto Lessee, and Lessee does hereby hire and take from Lessor, the following described land situated in Denton County, Texas, as described as follows: .,a As Land A 481.37 foot by 3S0 foot tract of land, which after ex- cluding three 20 foot by 350 foot easements for hangar taxiways is comprised of approximately 147,480 square feet, or 3.386 acres, drawn and outlined on Attachment A, having the following metes and boundst PAGE 3 4 I I k I I All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being art of the Wm. Neil survey, Abst, No. 974, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Mrs. Ellen Pearl Corbin, Et Al to The City of Denton by deed dated January 19, 1944 and recorded in Volume 30S, Page 216 of the Deed Records of Denton -f County, Texas, and more particularly described as followst j COMMENCING at the eastern most southeast corner of said tract said point lying In a north-south public road known as Underwoob Road, said point also lying in the east boundary tine of said Wm. Neil Survey, same being the west boundary line of the J. Hardin survey, Abst. No, 16S6; THENCE north 880 36' 1011 west a distance of S94.91 feet to a point for corner; THENCE north 10 231 SO" east a distance of 290.00 feet to a point for cornerl fr.' THENCE north 880 36' 10" west a distance of 350.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; said point being the southeast corner of the t ^ tract being described herein; THENCE north 880 36' 10" west a distance of 3S4.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE north 10 23' SO" east a distance of 481.37 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 880 36' 1011 east a distance of 350.00 feet to a - point for corner; t THENCE south 10 23' SO" west a distance of 411.37 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 3.87 acres of land. ' Together with the right of ingress and egress to said ft property; and the right, in common with others so authorized, of ' passage upon the Airport property generally, subject to reason- able regulations by the City of Denton; and such rights shall (r extend to Lessee's employees, passengers, patrons and invitees. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "Premises" shall mean ell property located within the metes and bounds ' described above including lease hold improvements constructed by V+y. the Lessee, but not including certain easements or property owned and/or controlled by the Lessor. ,r B, Additlinal Property a ' Y Lessee is hereby given the first right of refusal for a " period of five (S) years to lease a 481.37 foot by SSO foot tract PACE 4 r t ~ y6 bal•rwl wr.. _ _'i yw. e... a, 1 h.. / p , y.ti.r\.. Y. .a. .n 0.:tiVVF J'{ s,ar h r 7 k of land, which, after excluding three 20 foot by 350 foot ease- ments for hangar taxiways, is comprised of approximately 147,480 square feet, or 3.386 acres, drawn and outlined on attachment B, having the following metes and bounds: ' ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, StRte of Texas and 4 being part of the Wa. Neil survey, Abst. No. 970, and also 6 ing i art of a tract of land as conveyed frog Mrs. Ellen Pearl Corbin, it Al to The City of Denton by deed dated January 191 1944 and recorded in Volume 305, Page 216 of the Deed Records of Denton o County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the eastern most southeast corner of said tract, E said point lying in a north-south public road known as Underwood Road, said point also lying in the east boundary line of said Wm. Neil Survey, same being the west boundary line of the J. Hardin survey, Abst. No. 1656; r' THENCE north 880 361 1011 west a distance of S94.91 feet to a i point for corner; THENCE r.orth 10 231 SO" east a distance of 290.00 feet to the POINT OT BEGINNING; THENCE north 880 361 1011 west a distance of 3SO.00 feet to a point for corner; .f " THENCE north 30 231 SO" east a distance of 481.37 feet to a point for corner; YT THENCE south 880 361 1011 east a distance of 350.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 10 231 SO" west a distance of 481.37 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 3.87 acres of land. Lessee shall have forty-five (45) days to exercise this first right to lease the above-described land under terms and conditions to be negotiated herein, upon receiving notice from the City Manager of the City of Denton, that Lessor has a party 54 desiring to lease such property. sa C. Improvements Provided by. Lessor 1. Paved aircraft taxiways as outlined and drawn on Exhibits D and E, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, with the southern most taxiway to be extended from Taxiway J to the service road. 2. Paved vehicular roadway providing access to the leased premises as outlined and drawn on said Exhibits D and E. a 1 PAGE S tr 12 j 3. A six (6 11) inch water line and hydrants of size and flowage to allow usage for fire protection, 4. Electrical and water utilities to or in close proximity to the leased premises with access for Lessee. S. Six (6) security lights to be erected on the leased premises. 6. Drainage design and water drainage system capable of handling normal rainfall. For the purpose of this agreement, the term "Lessor Improvements" shall mean those things on the leased premises belonging to, constructed by, or to be constructed by the Lessor, which enhances or increases, or will enhance or increase, the value or quality of the leased lane! or property. Unless other- wise noted herein, all Lessor inpro;eoents are and will remain ax, the property of the Lessor. All improvojents made by Lessor must ` be described in detail above, or above referenced and attached to ri this agreement in an exhibit approved by the Lessor. III. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of twenty- five (25) years, commencing on the 1st day of February, 1987, and continuingg through the 30th day of January, 20120 unless earlier terminated under the provisions of the Agreement. Lessee shall have the first right of refusal to renegotiate this lease for two additional five (s) year periods at the and of the primary term 4 of twenty-five (2s) years at a renegotiated rental and terms mutually agreed upon by the Lessor and Lessee without regard for or considering the then cost of living index. If Lessee elects to renegotiate this Lease, It shall give notice in writin addressed to the City Manager at least one hundred eighty (180) days before the expiration of the primary term of twenty•flve (2S) years. 4 IV. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE N' 4~yr, A. FAA Ramp Proper a 1. Lessee shall lease that certain portion of the aircraft parking apron commonly referred to as the FAA ramp, and drawn and outlined on Attachment "C" an area equal to seven tie down spaces, under the terms and conditions described and outlined below for a period of 'twelve (10 months commencing on February 1, 1987 and con- tinuing through the 30th day of January, 1988 or until f sixty (60) days after the roadway and taxiwayi to the leased premises have been completed and are open for F ' PAGE 6 t;r . P (f~ I I f I l~ r Lessee's use, Should construction of the taxiways and roadway not commence within thirty hundred and f s lye ixt - (36S) days of the signing of this agreement, Lessor or Lessee shall be entitled to cancel this lease by g iving thirty (30) days written notice to Lessor. At the and of may conti uet to beelleased)o~ oatmonthhtormonthprbasisY subject to FAA approval. 2. As consideration for the lease of the ram Lessee shall pa Lessor the sum, of Two Hundred Ten Dollars ($210,00) per month, payable in advance on or before the first day of each month, 3. The lease of the ramp property shall be subject to the provisions of Article VI, B,, C,, XI It XIII, XIV, XV, and XVII of this lease agreement; all buildings and/or improvements excluding taxiways and hangar floors and aprons, moved to or constructed x upon the premises by Lessee shall remain the property of Lessee and shall be removed from the premises upon the termination of the lease of the FAA ramp property. B. Primary Property It is expressly understood and agreed that the development of the primary lease premises shall be divided into five incre- ments, with each increment comprised of 29,496 square feet. For the purpose of this agreement, those increments which are active shall be considered Property A and those increments which are inactive shell be considered Property B. An Increment shall be considered active and included in Property A upon the Issuance of ' a building permit for construction upon an inactive increment, Not later than sixty (60) days from Lessor's notification to Lessee of Cie completion of the site work and the availability of the primary lease premises for Lessee's use, the first increment of 29,496 square feet shall be activated and considered property A. Additional increments shall be activated and considered of Property A at intervals not to exceed twelve (12) montpart hs, until such time as all live increments are activated. Should an increment be activated because of construction, the requirement of annual activation shall not apply, All increments added to Property A sha'I be considered as part of Property A as if said additions were and had been within Property A from the original " data of execution of this agreement. V. PAYMENTS, RENTALS AND FEES Lessee covenants and agrees to pay to Lessor, as conside- ration for this lease, payments, rentals and fees as follows: r r , PAGE 7 a i E # c f i A. Land Rental j For and in consideration of the sum of fire hundred ($500.00) dollars, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Lessor leases to Lessee Property B. Upon the completion of taxiway and roadway, land rental shall be twenty-five ($2S.00) dollars per month in advance each month, for an additional sixty (60) days or until a building permit for construction is issued, whichever comes first. After sixty (60) days or upon issuance of a build- in permit, permit, the first increment shall be considered Property A and land rental shall be thu sum of two thousand sixty-four dollars and seventy-two cents ($2,064.71) per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments in the sum of one hundred seventy-two dollars and six cents ($172,06) in advance, on or before the first day of each and every month. Upon the activa- tion of the second increment, pursuant to and in accordance with Section IV, B. hereof, land rental shall be the sun of four thousand one hundred twenty-nine dollars and forty-four cents ~j (;4,129,44) per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments in the sum of three hundred forty-four dollars and twelve cents ($344.12) in advance, on or before the first day of each and every month. Upon the activation of the third increment, land rental shall be the sum of six thousand one hundred ninety-four dollars and sixteen cents ($6,194.16) per "j year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments in the i sum of five hundred sixteen dollars and eighteen cents ($S16.18) dollars in advance, on or before the first day of each and every month, Upon the activation of the fourth increment, land rental shall be the sum of eight thousand two hundred fifty-eight doilais and eighty-eight cents ($8,258.88), per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments in the sum of six hundred eighty-eight dollars and twenty-four cents ($688.24) in advance, on or before the first day of each and every month. Upon the activation of the fifth increment, land rental shall be the slim of ten thousand three hundred twenty-three dollars and sixty cents ($10,323.60) per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments in the sum of eight hundred sixty dollars and thirty cents ($860,30) in advance, on or before the first day of each ° and every month during the term of this agreement. Rr.-.r S. Lessor Imrrovement Rentals v None, as there are no improvements upon the leased a premises, C. Payment, Penalty, Adjustments All payments due Lessor from Lessee shall be delivered to the Airport Manager, unless otherwise designated in writing by the Lessor. Payments which are more than fifteen (15) days past PAGE 8 E /A • i I i t due shall be assessed a penalty of one-half (112) of one percent per day, compounded daily, for each day or fraction thereof which the payment or fee is more than fifteen (1S) days past due. The yearly rental for land and improvements herein leased shall be readjusted at the end of each five (S) year period during the term of this lease on the basis of the proportion that the then current All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) for the Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, as compiled by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics bears to the December, 1986 index which was (1967 . 100), The land rental amount is now based upon seven $0.07) cents per square foot per year for the land herein leased. ` These four (4) rental adjustments, If any shall occur on the following dates: a February 1, 1992 February 1, 2002 February 1, 1997 February 1, 2007 VI. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF LESSEE A. Ilse of Leased Premises Lessee is granted the non-exclusive privilege to engage in or provide the following: 1. The construction, erection, distribution, sale and lease of aircraft hangars. 2. Parking, storage and tie-down facilities for aircraft 4Y; °s upon or within the leased premises. ' 3. Office or storage space on or within the leased r premises for aviation activities or businesses. f. Lessee, its tenants and sublessees shall not be authorized to conduct any services not specifically listed In this agreement. » The use of the lease premises of Lessee, its tenants or sublessees ` shall be limited to only those private, commercial, retail or in- dustrial activities having to do with or related to airports and aviation, No person, business or corporation may operate a com- mercial, retail or industrial business upon the premises of Lessee or upon the Airport without a lease or license from Lessor auth- orizing such commercial, retail or industrial activity. Standards Lessee shall meet or exceed the following standards: i 1, Address, Lessee shall file with the Airport Manager and k eep current its mailing address, telephone )J1 t i PAGE 9 a t ti ~ i number(s) and contacts where it can be reached in an j emergency. 2. List. Lessee shall file with the Airport Manager and keeep current a list of it, tenants and sublessees, Such list shall also include all aircraft located on the leased premises, including aircraft make, model, identification number, and the owner's name, address and telephone number. 3, Conduct. Lessees shall contractually require its emp oyees and sublessees (and sublesseels invitees) to abide by the term's of this agreement. Lessee shall promptly enforce it3 contractua), rights in the event of a default of such covenants, 4. Utilities Taxes and Fees, Lessee shall meet all `expenses an paymen s n connection with the use of the Premises and the rights and privileges herein granted ' including the timely payment of utilities, taxes, permit j fees, license fees and assessments lawfuily levied or assessed, S. Laws. Lessee shall comply with all current and future a~ Teederal, state and local laws, rules and regulations which may apply to the conduct of business contemplated, W,e including rules, regulations and ordinances promulgated by Lessor, and Lessee shall keep in effect and post in II it prominent place all necessary and/or required licenses 'I or permits. x; b. Maintenance of Property, Lessee shall be responsible or the ma nienance, repair and upkeep of all pro erty r~ buildings, structures and improvements, including the mowing or elimination of grass and other vegetation on the Premises, and shall keep said Premises neat, clean and in respoctable condition, free from any objection- able matter or thing, 7, Unauthorized use of remises. Lessee may not use any o t e ease an or prom ses for the operation of a motel, hotel, restaurant, private club or bar, aport• ment house, or for industrial, commercial or retail purposes, except is authorized herein. .y 86 1 ell ins* It Is expressly understood and agreed that " no permanent dwelling or domicile may be built, moved to or established on or within the leased premises nor may the Lessee, its tenants, invitees, or guests be permitted to reside or remain as a resident on or withtz the leased premises or other airport premises, PAGE 10 ar^ r i i 4, Quit Possession, Lessee shall quit possession of all f premises ease herein at the end of the primary term of this lease or any renewal or extension thereof, and deliver up the premises to Lessor in as good condition as existed when possession was taken by Lessee, reason- able wear and tear excepted. 10, Hold Harmless. Lessee shall indemnify and hold harm- Te.s the Lessor from end against all loss and damages, including death, personal injury, loss of property or other damages, arising or resulting from the operation of Lessee's business In and upon the leased premises, 6 11, Waiver of Liability and Indemnification. Lessee further covenants an agrees t a Will not old Lessor or any of Lessor's agents, officers or employees responsible for any loss occasioned by fire, theft, rain, windstorm hail, or from any other cause whatsoever, whether said cause be the direct, indirect or merely a contributing factor in producing the loss to any airplane, auto- mobile, personal property, parts or surplus that may be located or stored in the hangars, T-hangars, offices, aprons, field, or any other location at airport; and Lessee agrees that the planes, and their c w ents are 4< to be stored, whether on the field or lis the hangars, at Lessee's risk. Lessee agrees to indemnify, defend and save airport its agents, officers, representatives and employees, Aarmless from and against any and al{ liability or loss resulting from claims or court action arising directly or indirectly out of the activities of f' Lessee, its a ents, servants, guests or business visitors under t~is agreement or by any act or omission of such person. C. Signs During the term of this Agreement, Lessee shall have the right, at its own expense, to place in or on the lease premises signs identifying Lessee, Said signs shall be of a size, shApe and design, and at a location or locations, approved by the ry~ Lessor and in conformance with any overall directional graphics or sign program established by Lessor on the Airport, Lessor's approval shall not be withheld unreasonably. Said signs shall be maintained in good repair throughout the term of this agree- went, Notwithstanding any other provision of thin agreement, said signs shall remain the property of Lessee. Lessee shall remove, at its expense, all lettering, signs and placards so .r erected on the premises at the expiration of the term of this Agreement or extensions thereof, r r PAGE 11 4.. : ! VII. COVENANTS BY LESSOR j s Lessor hereby agrees as follows: A. Peaceful Enjoyment. That on payment of rent, fees, and performance o the covenants and agreements on the part of Lessee ! to be performed hereunder, Lessee shall peaceably hold and enjoy the leased premises and all rights and privileges herein granted; B. Compliance. Lessor warrants and represents that in the establishment, construction and operation of said Denton Municipal Airport, that Lessor has heretofore and at this time is complying with all existing rules, regulations, and criteria distributed by ' the Federal Aviation Administration, or any other 4overnmental authority relating to and including, but not limited to, noise abatement, air rights and easements over adjoining and contiguous areas, over-flight in landing or takeoff, to the and that Lessee will not be legally liable for any action of trespass or similar cause of action by virtue of any aerial operations over adjoining property in the course of normal takeoff and landing procedures from said Denton Municipal Airport Lessor further warrants and represents that at all times during the term hereof, or any renewal or extension of same, that it will continue to comply with the foregoing. VIII. SPECIAL CONDITIONS It is expr9ssly understood and agreed by and between Lessor and Lessee that this lease agreement is subject to the following special terms and conditions: M Runways and Taxiways. Because of the present sixty thousand (ZTU pouna continuous use weight bearing capacity of i° the runway and taxiways of the Airport, Lessee herein agrees to limit all aeronautical activity including landing, takeoff and } taxiing, to aircraft having an actual weight, including the " weight of its fuel, of sixty thousand (600000) pounds or less, until such time that the runway and designated taxiways on the 4 Airport have beon improved to handle aircraft of such excessive ' weights. It is further agreed that, based on qualified engineer- ing studies, the weight restrictions and provisions of this clause x' may be adjusted, up or down, and that the Lessee agrees to abide by any such changes or revisions as such studies may dictate. "Aeronautical Activity" referred to in this clause shalt include that activity of the Lessee or its agents or subcontractors, and ts;~ its customers and invitees, but shall not include those tietivities over which it has no soliciting part or control, such as an unso- licited or unscheduled or emergency landing. Negligent disregard of the provisions of this section shall be sufficient to cause the immediate termination of this entire Agreement and subject the Lessee to be liable for any damages to the Airport that might result. 3 PACE 12 y • . T{/ x. t .S a r j IX, LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS A. Required Iro rovements. As part of the consideration for the pr v ege herein granted, Lessee is required to and hereby aggrees to construct or otherwise make improvements to the pre- mises, as specified herein, but not limited to, the following: 1. Five (S) T-hangars, pads and related aircraft driveways. 2. Three (3) 43 x 36 Box type hangars, pads and related i aircraft driveways. k Lessee shall provide Lessor with tentative plans for the ~l development of the entire premises herein leased together with a tentative timetable or schedule for said development. Should said development not occur within the specific time limits mutually agreed upon by and between Lessor and Lessee, Lessor shall have the option to cancel the lease on all non developed portions of said lease after a thirty (30) day written notice to Lessee to ti cure such a default, B, Plans. Lessee agrees that it shall, within one hundred eighty T= calendar days from the date the roadways and taxi- ways have been constructed and are open for Lessee's use, submit to the Lessor, for approval, detailed plans and specifications for the above listed initial proposed leas hold improvements, Lessor agrees that it shall either approve the plans and speci- fications as submitted, or transmit proposed revisions to Lessee, within forty-five (45) calendar days ofreceipt of the plans and specifications from Lessee, In the event that Lessor requires revisions of the original plans and specifications, Lessee shall have forty-five (45) calendar da s from the date of receipt of _ the proposed revisions to resubmit the plans and specifications ~A. for Lessor's approval. Such approval shall not be withheld unreasonabiy. Construction shall commence within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days of Lessee's receipt of Lessor's final approval of the plans and specifications, and shall be scheduled ' for completion not later than one hundred eighty (180) days after commencement of construction. y' C. Additional Re uirements. Before commencing the construc- tion of any ~lmprovemen*s upon the premises, Lessee shalt submit; 1. Documentation, specifications, or design work, to be s approved by the Lessor, which shall establish that the improvements to be built or constructed upon the lease premises are in conformance with the overall site, shape, color, quality and design in appearance and structure, of the program established by the Lessor on the Airport, X PACE 13 p w A n ~ 7 i 1, All information required of the e of division and Land Development City of Denton Sub- requirements are on file Regulations (outlin office), in the Airport Manager's i 3. The estimated cost of such construction. No construction ma City Council, hay a y comPence until Lessor acting by location of the improv roved the and its ements, plans and specosto 'Cations struction, and the agreed t e estimated costs of such ch the st $k ruclure, Approval bestimated life of the con- ably withheld by the City Council shall not beuiunreasonr should the Council fail to deny Lessee's plans speciflcations within sixty (60 da the Council, such ) Ys of submission thereof cnd approved, plans and specifi to Documentary evidence of t cations shall be deemed of public areas and/or facilities shall be delivered b he actual cost of construction Lessor's City Manager from time to time as such costs are aid Lessee, and Lessor's City Manager is hereby author by Lessee to upon a copy of this lease filed with lied to p se tx such actual amounts as he shall have the City h vet been id endorse Secretary of Lessor him upon said contract shall be conclusive upon all for all purposes of this agreement, pp by partids authD. Additional Construction or Im rovesents, to construe upon t e an Lessee is hereby cost and ex ease ere n leased, at its own and Lessee mutuailyuagreegare hangars, and " operations authorl:ed by this lease ' that Lessor forsuseclnrconnecti the provided however, before rw; commencing the construction of any Improvements upon the °n with Lessee rticle shall submit A plans and specifications as speciEledSein A I Paragraph (Additional Requirements), fi, Relocation of Han ars, e r, agreement an an Lessor may, during the term of this i 1 some or all of Its xhangarsstothereof, require Lessee to relocate I conditions are met =1y with Lessor's requirement if the irort, 1. That the requirement to relocate be b the majority of the Council members of by resolution by Of the City of Denton, a City Council 2• That the Lessee be given fourteen (14) days notice of the City Council's Intent to act on such a re ` and Lessee be Council at given an opportunity to speak before the appears on thehagenaaell meeting at which this item [3QY ' 1 1 J; PAGE 14 rc 'M1.. i 3. That equal or better facilities including those items described in Section 2C of this agreement together with 111 equal or better roadway access to the new facility, be i constructed and completed at Lessor's expense prior to relocation. 4. That Lessee shall be given six (6) months to complete the relocation of its property. 5. That Lessor shall compensate Lessee for Lessee's actual cost.: in relocating its property by deducting such costs from Lessee's monthly rental each month or fraction thereof until Lessee is compensated in full. 6. That Lessee shall not be required to relocate more than one time (including location and event.) 1 F. Ownership of Improvements It is understood and agreed that all Port-A-Post buildings and certain improvements constructed upon or brought to the pre- mises by Lessee shall remain the property of Lessee or its Sub- lessees and that they may be moved on or from the leased premises by the Lessee or its Sublessees; except that all buildings and improvements of whatever nature remaining upon the leased premises at the end of the primary term, or any extension thereof, of this lease shall automatically become the property of Lessor asolutely in fee without any cost to Lessor. No building or improvement shall be removed from the leased premises should Lessee or its Sublessees be in default of this lease agreement. It is agreed that the life property hereinfleased is thirty five (3S) years by Lessee on the G, Building Valuation Should this lease be cancelled for any reason before the end of the twenty-five (25) year primary term, or extensions thereof, it is expressly understood and agreed that Lessor j reserves the right to purchase all buildings, structures and improvements then existing upon the premises by tendering to Lessee one thirty-fifth (i/35) of the undepreciated value of such buildin for each year remaining on the agreed life of such build- Ing, TKe undepreciated value of all improvements is to be deter- mined by having such improvements appraised by three appraisers, one appointed by Lessor, one appointed by Lessee and one appointed by the two appraisers. X. SUBROGATION OF MORTGAGEE - Any person, corporation or institution that lends money to r Lessee for construction of any hangar, structure, building or PAGE l5 F 3 c improvement and retains a security interest in said hangar, structure, building or improvement sha11, uon default of Lessee's obligations to said mortgagee, have the p right a enter upon said leased premises and operate or manage said hantar building or improvement according to the terms of his Agreement, for a period not to exceed the term of the mortgage with Lessee, or until the loan is paid in full, whichever comes first, but in no event longer than the term of this Lease. It is expressly understood and agreed that the right of the mortgagee referred to herein is limited and restricted to those improvements constructed with funds borrowed from mortgagee. XI. RIGHT OF EASEMENT Lessor shall have the right to establish easements, at no cost to Lessee, upon the leased providing utility services to, from or portuproperty or for the construction of public facilities on the Airport. How- ever, any such easements shall not interfere with Lessee's use of the leased premises and Lessor shall restore the property to i+s : original condition upon the installation of any utility services on, in, over or under any such easement or the conclusion of such construction. XII. ASSIGNMENT OR SUALEASE OF LfiASB A. Asst nment. Lessee expressly covenants that it will not assign t s ease, convey more than forty-nine of the interest in its business, deemed herein topercent n the `con- j trolling interest in its business, through the sale of stock or otherwise, nor sublet, assign, transfer, nor license the whole or .~l any part of the said premises for any purpose, except for rental of hangar space or tie-down space, without the written consent of the Lessor. The provisions of this lease shall remain binding is upon the assignees, if any, of Lessee. s B. Sublease. Lessee shalt the lease agreement to be utilized pro subletting, andhIf therform 3 should change, Lessee shall submit any amendments thereto. Pro- vided, however, that each such sublease shall automatically termi- nate in the event of termination of this lease, and the owner of the hangar shall immediately remove the hangar unless a lease or j' license is entered into with the Cit for such site, agrees that it will not ►nnreasonably withhold its approval of the sale or sublease of the facilities for airport related purposes, r. ' XIII. ACCESS BY CITY Lessee shall permit Lessor's authorized agents free access to the leased premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of PAGE 16 t f inspection, making necessary improvements or repairs, or enforcing the terms of this lease. XIY. INSURANCE A. Re uirea Insura,:ce. Lessee shall maintain continuously in effect at a t Me! during the term of this agreement, at Ussee's expense, the following insurance coverages. jjj 1. Comprehensive General Liability covering the leased' premises, the Lessee or its company, its pevsonnel and its operations on the airport. 2. Aircraft Liability to cover all flight operations of Lessee. S. Fire and extended coverage for replacement value for all facilities used by the Lessee either as a part of this agreement or erected by the Lessee subsequent to this agreement. 4. Liability insurance limits shall be in the following minimum amounts: ' Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 per occurrence Property Damage: $1,000,000 per occurrence. 5, All policies shall name the City of Denton as an addi- tional named insured and provide for a minimum of thirty (30) days written notice to the City prior to the effective date of any cancellation or lapse of such policies. 6 All policies must be approved by the Lessor, i 7. The Lessor shall be provided with a copy of all such policies. B. Lessor reserves the right to increase the types or amounts a~tyr of insurance coverage, and to require any additional amounts of ,i insurance coverage, and to require any additional riders or pro- visions in said policies or certificates as may be considered necessary by the Lessor's Risk Manager. Lessor may not make such changes more than once a year. Lessee shall comply with such notice within thirty (30) days. v XY. CANCELLATION BY LESSOR In the event that Lessee shall file a voluntary petition in` bankruptcy or proceedings in bankruptcy shall be instituted PAGE 17 r t; r< ar a .a... w •r„p.,:. rs •ti:.q agpM.r.r." q t Y f k 4 against it and Lessee thereafter is adjudicated bankrupt pursuant to such proceedings, or any court shall take jurisdiction of Lessee and its assets pursuant to proceedings brought under the provisions of any Federal reorganization act, or Lessee shall be divested of its estate herein by other operation of law; or Lessee shall fail to perform, keep and observe any of the terms, covenants, or conditions herein contained, or on its part to be performed, the Lessor may give Lessee written notice to correct such condition or cure such default and, if any condition or default shall continue for thirty (30) days after the receipt of such notice by Lessee, then Lessor may, terminate this lease by a written notice to Lessee. In the event of default, Lessor has the right to purchase any or all structures on the leased premises un~er the provisions of Section VIII Paragraph C (Cancellation) hereof. a XVI. CANCELLATION BY LESSEE Lessee may cancel this Agreement, in whole or part, and terminate all or any of its obligations hereunder at any time, by thirty (30) days written notice, upon or after the happening of any one of the following events: 1. Issuance by any court of competent jurisdiction of a permanent injunction in any way preventing or restrain- ing the use of said airport or any part thereof for airport purposes; 2. The breach by Lessor of any of the covenants or agree- ments contained herein and the failure of Lessor to remedy such breach for a period of ninety (90) days after receipt of a written notice of the existence of such breach; 3. The inability of Lessee to use said premises and facilities continuing for a longer period thsh ninety (90) days due to any law or any order, rule or regu- lation of any appropriate governmental authority having jurisdiction over the operations of war, earthquake or other casualty; or Lessor or due to ~t;_"• 4. The assumption or recapture by the United States Govern- ment or any authorized agency thereof the maintenance " and operation of said airport and facilities or any sub- stantial part or parts thereof. Upon the happening of any of the four events listed in, the receding paragraph, such that the leased premises cannot be used or aviation purposes, then Lessee may cancel this lease as afore- soid, or may elect to continue this lease under its terms, except PAGE 19 i i i j however, that the use of the leased premises shall not be limited f to aviation purposes, such use being only limited by such laws I and ordinances as may be applicable at that time. k XVII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. Entire A regiment. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding etween the parties and as of its effective date I supersedes all prior or independent Agreements between the parties covering the subject matter hereof. Any change or modification hereof shall be in writing signed by both parties. Y B. Bindin Effect. All the covenants, stipulations and agreements herein snail extend to, bind and inure to the benefit of the legal representatives, successors and assigns of the E respective parties hereto. " C. Severabilit . If a provision hereof shall be finally declare void or ---illegal by any court or administrative agency having jurisdiction, the entire Agreement shall not be void; but the remaining provisions shall continue in affect as nearly as `r possible in accordance with the original intent of the parties. D, Notice. An notice given b one Y party to the other in connect 43" n with this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be { T sent by registered mail, return receipt requested, with postage and registration fees prepaid: 1. If to Lessor, addressed tom City Manager City of Denton Denton, Texas 76201 i` 2. If to Lessee, addressed to: Port-A-Port, Incorporated Route 1 Box 14K a" Paso Roles, California 93446 v Notices shall be deemed to have been received on the date r of receipt as shown on the return receipt. B. Headings. The hesdings used in this Agreement are intended for convenience of reference only and do not define or limit the acope or meaning of any provision of this Agreement. P. _O_o_V_e_rniinn Law. This Agreement is to bo construed in accor- dance w tl- the Taws of the State of Texas. F r ' 'PAGE 19 ~es~drr,JJ:RV V.y 5 r.'1tr .r s, r• . ,:H, aYl.a r. ra s.r. A; i i i G. Waiver of Default. Acceptance by either party following a 11 default w not a eemed a waiver of such default. No waiver by either party of a default will constitute a waiver of any other default. J, Abandonment, if the Lessee shall abandon the leased pre- mises_atay t e during the term of this lease or be disposed ro:ess of law or otherwise, any personal property belonging by p after eg to Lessee d or left on the ssionrshallsbehdeemed3to have after such abandonment been transferred to the Lessor, and the Lessor shall have the r right to remove and to dispose of the same without liability to account therefor to Lessee or to any person claiming under Lessee. executed this Agreement and year OFfirht above erhave as o IN the WIday TNESS en, CITY OF D£NTON, TEXAS, LESSOR i ; BY: r 10 9TEPHE a` ATTEST rl' ACTING CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED, AS TO LEGAL FORM: D$BRA ADAMI DRAYTVEXABxj CITY ATTORNEY • CITY OF DENTON, 1'. µ SY: p"' J PORT-A-PORT, LESSEE ATTEST: i4 r BY: ' PAGE 20 i, % TAXIWAY "J" 30' i 1061,041' i j r ~l,I.a ~ I ® I~ f I r 1 r ~ , Q - 31 rR . Ikk 1 ~ Mr 13 tot \ iii0tt , t St ) 4-6, . ` u........ - ~ r•• M'UTUR~ IMDU~IR1 L ARIA r 0, ;/f \ 'J 11.+1!1! ARE! ,........ia,r...... r } { f t; ~aa••,, ` %t a ' TAXIWAY 'J* ~k~•xtN.f' $ i 30' i 1061.06' ' j 1 I } OeR LIV 10 1 1 ; i 11 1 j © 1I Vim` I L~L.I r t , ~lw t . A NI q t ttbiT l N I t~ . "lies a. 'J r . " NI 6710 t C460 No ' 1 I / """"'•'•~UTURq INOU TRI L AR4 A t A1711 R[a 1 1 ,r ~ ~ 6111 S 1 1 I 1 \ Amy,,,,,.,..., . . _ . . xda•,w,r t ,,w ~ c , x,1,1 . A'CrA~c~,~art C t s IA y F ~ r~/ ly I $ t Y 11 ~ . 1 'r <f ~ ~ `J ~ ' 7. Jai 1 4, I ll~ I P' C fl,~ _ ..,r_a+RArrt .W 'w7 • t j t t CMV0f DENTONt TEXA8 MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON. TEXAS 70201 / TELEPNONE(817) OOO 307 December 26, 1986 Office of the GtyA/ana0a Mr. Ken Keatrs Port - A - Port " Route 19 Box 14 K Paso Robles, California 93446 Dear Mr. Keatts; Enclosed is a final copy of the lease agreement that we received. My apoloplea for not sending one to 'r4 we discussed In our phone conversation, i have alsosIncluded Aa diagd ram which would stope the construction of the taxiways, we wau proposed to build either the furthest north or the furthest south taxiway all the way. from taxiway J to the service road, And we would also propose to build the taxiway at the other extreme across r he entire width of the first r parcel or some 35000 We would connect there two by a temporary try road that would be constructed In a north-south direction across the western portion of the optional property, This would allow for vehicular traffic to enter the hanger areas from the service road and would not be affected by any decisions that the FAA•aade about vehicular traffic on taxiway J. Since you mentioned the co-sitrucrfon we would possibility of staging some propose to build the middle taxiway as you lease ire hangers on it and/or as you leased the fourth portion of your original lease. The final two sections of the taxiway 1n your optional property would be birllt before the optional property was lessee. If this scheduling kould work for ' y incorporate this language In the lease a woIf a uld pro dl~~++oEfse rent scenario or scheduling would be more appropriate for you, we you, would be happy to try and discuss those and reach an agreement nt is soon as possible, To that end, we are continuinp to work to try and have tke lease ready for the 6th of January for Council t review, We will keep iou notified as to its progress, a We look forward to continuing to work with for taking the time to review this alternative. you and thank you 5tnt , 00 1 . 6,61ke.00 h a Assistant City Manager ' Fnclosures !w/d23S'd . ~a r I , r 1.0 "E Attachment E } r ; ; E 11 n , 1 . ~ ~ I TAXIWAY J 30• I069.08 1 I too ~ ~ t ®0ww 1MMNATIcv cO I }1L Lx ® gL 0.0 O~ As Lcmwm o f t O l ' Cr- T7 TVs 1 1 J 4im C 4TWAL r70"L i ; 0 tbAetep 1 r I ~ 1 r f r I 12 r .I 1 1 r 1 r ' 1 • i ~ ~ ~ W • N ~ ~ X M el r :11 100 02 /31 1 r , r ~ s •1• I ~ , OWL% N 1613 50"l ,a 00 I .00 '1 NI° 2S do . NI•a . i 160,00 t~ r r ~ , f I I •,hl°2760 t ,i4L0:ZL ' •o,% I r r '1 I ~ I 'f ~ r ; 1 ; I 1 1 ....:...._..FUTUR~ INDU; TRI~►L ARIf+A I i, 1bb2L ✓,vV RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CREATING AND APPOINTING THE CAPITAL RECOVERY FEES CITIZENS' COMMITTEE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, ' WHEREAS, the City Council has, upon the recommendation of the ! Public Utility Board authorized Cam , p, Dresser and McKee to con- duct a feasibility and implementation study for the establishment of capital recovery fees; and WHEREAS, such study contemplates the appointment of a citizens' committee to provide input and assistance to the consultants and the City; NOW, THEREFORE, it BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. That the following individuals are hereby appointed to constitute the "Capital Recovery Fees Citizens' Committee", «1 a , At Large Representative City Council Member c't Public Utilities Board Member Public Utilities Board Member «A' , Chamber/Board of Realtors Representative University Representative League of Women Voters Representative Home Owner Home Owner t sy,' . , Home Owner t ;r= , Retired Home Owner Engineering Firm Representative Apartment Dweller (possible strident) Homebuilder Association Representative Small Business Owner SECTION Ii, That is hereby appointed as the chalrmah o such omm itee. s; ' rr ri 1 Y; ti i + i SECTION III. $ That the Committee shall coordinate with Camp, Dresser and i McKee and the Public Utilities Board in the study on the feasibility and implementation of capital recovery fees and shall t report its findings to the Public Utilities Board. SECTION IV, That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. ti f PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987, r ` CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTS a," a ACTING CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS b, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; ' DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 14' HYs r y ry i . is 1 " e, t, CITY coaNCtL .PORT roRruT TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council ?Ram: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUB32CT: RLCOlMt;HDATIOMs Recommend Council approve the use of smoking and smokeless tobacco policy . 108.03 ti r r.,4 BMWRyt One policy is being presented for Council consideration. q y . eACIcRautrn: . The use of smoking and smokeless tobacco policy 108.03 is a new policy. 3 210ORAMB. DEPAR'PM NTS OR CROUPS A?rgcTiD: All employees t> . f lISCAL IMPACT! c, The policy will have no fiscal impact on the general fend. k 's F6; Keeps u11y ub t di ` oy Harrsll 7 Prepared by= City Manager 0~j i Paulette Ovens-Holmes ' Program Administrator l~~ . App d! n r+ Y Bat c I, an s AeAiatant City Manager vx i P, a S 1694L a r 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING POLICY N0. 108.03 "USE OF SMOKING AND SMOKE- LESS TOBACCO'!; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. M WHEREAS, the Director of the Personnel /Employee Relations Department for the City of Denton has presented a proposed policy ' regarding employee rules and regulations for the Council's consideration; and n WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such policy as an w' official policy regarding employment with the City; NOW, THEREFORE, ~e a 5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION 1. The following policy, attached hereto and made a part erTi re~~s hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of a. Denton, Toxass Use of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco (Reference No. 108.03) SECTION II. The foregoing policy is attached hereto and made a part ereo an shalt be filed in the official records of the City of Denton with the City Secretary. : SECTION III. This Resolution shall become effective immediately a•, vv)on Its passage and approval. r•, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987. ~r. i° i' 4 ~ - l! CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS t~ ATTEST: 14 Ct• i St. JENNIFER WXLTEKS ACTING CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: " DEBRA ADAHI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: • a...r.~.. r.:- . r'.: .r ..d ah'. s • 44a a.p Y.xI. 4.1.4Y.,~ r ~ YA11r la /4f~ 9\ rq. ° i ° f L 0 i 4 ~ i , CITY OF DENTON PAGE I OF 3 3 POLICY/ADMINISTAATIVA 10IOCZDU231ADIIINI6TRATIVA DIAZCTIVA REFERENCE SECTION: NUMBER, i PIRSONNIL/AMPLOYBZ RYLATIONS 108.03 EFFECTIVE OATS} SUBJECT: {1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT y. ' TITLE: REPLACES: USA OF SMOKING AND SMOKILASS TOBACCO R' f ' POLICY STATZMINTs Y The City of Denton recognises that the use of emokinC and @=kale@@ tobaoao is the workplace aril be a discomfort to those in confined work environmmnts. In an effort to provide a healthy, pleasant, and efficient work environment for all employees, the use of smoking and emokeless tobacco shall be prohibited in designated areas and those areas where members of the public and *"loyees rputini'ly have aooess. The supervisor also has the prerogative to prohibit thi.we of smakiAg and smokeless tobacco in any area under hielber supervision. Vhenever a mutual agreement cannot be reached, the preference of the nameor of tobacco shall be considered controlling. .4 ADMINISTRATIYA DIRZOTIVZs o I. THA USA OF SMOKING TOBACCO A., Non-designated Smoking Areas c 1. Smoking shall be prohibited in the following d"igaated are" of city faoilitiess ~ a. Conference and meeting room b. Classroom and training rooms a. Open areas of libraries d. Auditoriums e. Copier and computer terminal room f. Restroom and publio lounges ar g. Looker rooms ;Tt h. Storage areas tr. i. Alevators J. Halle k. Stairwells { 1. All areas where smoking would be a safety hazard or could cause damage to sensitive equipment, process" s or i materials. fA r; S=; 1~~~''Y ~iC' Wi er..._... _ . J n s " u i F.. .."R{k('.~rii.~`, 4 1 °tY F 3 PAGE? OP 3- rOLIOT/ADIIININTRATIYR PRO02DORR/ADYINISTRATITI DIRROTITR (Oeatlaeed) NUMBER: TITLE: USR OF SMOKING AND $flOBRLS88 TOBACCO 108.03 c' ~ y 2. In addition, smoking shall be prohibited in all areas to which members of the public and employees routinely hive access. These include, but are not limited to% I a. Lobbies b. Reception areas o. Customer conference areas d. Cashier locations. 'y B. Designated Smoking Areas 1. In such areas where smoking is otherwise not prohibited, the t preferenoe of the people in the area shall dictate vbether y t smoking is permitted in that area. Smoking is permitted in the ` following designated areas of City facilities: a. Open office environments w t b. Individual offices o. City vehicles d. tmployee lounges e, tmployee break rooms. 2. In areas where smoking is permitted and prior to smoking, as employee meat first secure the unanimous consent of all persons in that area. C. A sign prohibiting smoking shall be posted at the main entrance to every City owned facility and in areas where smoking is prohibited within the workplace. This sign shall be oonipicuous and contain the the words "No Smoking," the universel symbol for no smoking, or other language that clearly prohibits smoking. R. T8t USt Or SNOULISS TOBACCO A. Smokeless tobacco is prohibited in the following designated areas of City facilitiesi 1. All office environments = 2. tnolosed work facilities 3. Areas where sanitation is a prob',#a, as designated by the area supervisor. .m .a r. 41 1 Y. ~~yy PAO1 LOF__j POWMAD1l1NI8TRATIYR PROORDIIRWADYINIATlATIYR DIANOTIYI (Oeat on c 4 d 3 TITLE: Me 1N! USt OF SMOKiNO AND $MOKRL1gy TOBACCO NuMSln: 0 3. Designated Smokeless Tobacco Areas ' 1. In such areas where the use of smokeless tobacco is otherwise not prohibited, the preference or the people in the area shall ' dictate the status of that area The use of i e smokeless obacco permitted in the following designated areas of City owned faoilities: A. City owned vehicles b. Areas where sanitation is not a problem. 2. In areas where smokeless tobacco is permitted, prior smokeless tobacco, an employee must first secure the to nmou 1 consent of all persons in that area. a the unanimous III, It shall be the responsibility of the user to clean up area, where c smoke or smokeless tou,oco is permitted. A supervisor my prohibit the use of smoke or smokei•,s tobacco for failure or the user to provide proper disposal and sanitation of smoke or smokeless tobacco remnants. x IV. ADMINISTRATIVR PROCIDDAR a Supervisors will be responsible for the cosauntoatton of and comp with the guidelines of this policy. The preference of the nonuriofoe 4, tobacco shall be considered controlling it a mutual agreement cannot be reached. A" employs who has a problem, c the enforcement of this policy and directive isaencouragedntorutiliae the procedures outlined in Policy 115.02 "Problem Solving." V. CONPLICTS In the event of any conflict between this policy and Article IV, "SMOKINO,M of CHAPTRR 13 of the CODR OF ORDINANC4S OF THR CITY OF * DINTON, whtchever is more restrictive shall be controlling. kk Di/16/ST t, 1! F. CifY of WNTON, TWUS MUNICIPAL BUILDINO / 215 E. MCKINNEY ST. ! DENTON, TEXAS 7620E t MEMORANDUM TOi BETTY MC KLAN FROM: PAULETTE OWENS-ROLMES, PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR DATEt JANUARY 15, 1987 SUBJb'CTt POLICIES AND PROCEDURES t S At the January 20 City Council meeting, we will be presenting the use of # Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco Policy 108.03 for adoption. The following is a brief summary of the development and contents of this policy. 7. The use of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco Policy is the result of about ht three years of research and development by employee and management task e forces as well as input from employees and the legal Department. In addition, policies from other titles as well as the private sector were solicited and studied. The task forces, comprised of amokers and non- smokers, have attempted to consider all sides of the smoking issue and t G~ develop a policy that is in the best interest of all employees. We realise that cessation of smoking in the work plate is a volatile issue, Therefore, the use of Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco Policy was i sent to all departments for formal input on several occasions in an r. attempt to consider all concerns and options. As a result we feel con- fident that we have developed a policy that is palatable for evokers. and non-smokers alike. In an effort to provide a healthy, pleasant, and efficient work environ•- mint for all employees, the use of smokinS and smokeless tobacco will be prohibited in designated areas as well to those areas where members of the public/employees routinely have access. In areas where smoking is permitted and prior to smoking, an employee must first secure the unanimous cor.sant of all person in that area. w ' 81x/666.8200 D/fW METRO 434.2520 117 ry Mir.. F arv- .i p..Y. 1 MC KERN Y ' PACE-2 r:4 I Whenever a mutual agreement cannot be reached, the preference of the non- user of tobacco shall dictate. The supervisor also, has the prerogative ' to prohibit the use of smoking and smokeless tobacco in any area under his/her supervision. s" r .4 ~ Paulette Program Administrator k' POH/1j ]✓i YL r nt d to ~ t 4Y t T x + tt ~C ,z r , i 7y - r ' ~ to ~..,,....rrt+~ak+R±c;•i•>~:a..i+a4ew.u!'uak+w;+a3diYStlecr 'uel,rr~i r»_.. .i'. p y r. 1A pg LLy ~ k' a Z i Lit CffYA10lNr0N, TtXA8 MUNICIPAL SU10INa / DENTON TEXAS 70201 / TELEPHONE(817) 606-8507 Office of Me Olfy Afenager M M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and members of the City Council FROMr Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager x~ t~• DATEr January 16, 1987 SUBJ2CTI Potential Names for the Beautification Task Force i have visited with Jeff Meyer about any individuals whom he feels would be good additions to the BeautlficatiOn Task force `at to be considered by the Council. Jeff provided me with the following names of individuals who have expressed an interest in this subject in the past and might be good members for consideration to appointment to the task force. we offer these x names only as potential members and we are 'certainly not suggesting their appointment by the Council. ,r r, Sam Marino Karen Abernathy Jim Englebrecht Jo Grimmer ` Elisabeth Garrett Joanne wheeler Dr. Harrel Landry Randy Boyd 2n addition, the following individuals are members of the 'sMr current Beautification Committee under the Parks and Recreation afrom nthis particlular may want to appoint a representative or two Fred Patterson " Grant Jacobson f Tom Herpool Terry Blalock Gertrude Gibson Mrs. FeWs McKnight Donna Ryan John Cooper James Gacdenhire Lloyd V, Harrell 41 , City Manager jw/253iC .1+'b~'li Nps.,.u.. a .+..wr-....< nsa-~rrWnlrr.Ct.w.9r •r.. .a..,.. uH1fa. ~:kHS,4YYL Y°a¢AW.,.. J t. i b e t, y , qR Mme' yp~.. I 1 L 6' ! r 2Y. ~ fe f~ w. t A L E F1 ism l z a YSaa ~~ty L k Oki y Y,