HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-10-1987
i
j
AGENDA E
CITY Of DENTON CITY COUNCIL
'Ma[ch'10,,79~7 f
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
March I01 1987, at 5:30 p.m, in the Civil Defense Roam of the
Municipal Building et which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
Mold a discussion ro ardin
F 9 4 potential :ending for Flow
Hospital.
2. Bold a discussion on a joint funding proposal for
y drainage work in the Golden Triangle Industrial Park. '
`a
3, Executive Senslon:
- A Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(eArt. 6252.17
` V. A. T.S.
's i •
a, Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f Art. 6252-77
V.A.T.S. ;
rd
I, Hold a discussion regarding potential sites
for a future water treatment plants
y~
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Secs 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
I. Hold a discussion regarding the duties of
the Municipal Judge and the Court Clark to
Office.
e
~t Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,'
' March 10, 1987, at 7:00 p.ms in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 pm,
1. Consider Approval of the minutes of the regular
n;~ttimessing of September .2, 79860 September 9, 19660 and
gh~,R }w. October 21 1981.
24 Consider approval of a request by the Denton Kiwanis
7r' Club t0
place a banner. across ~ public street to advertise the Kiwanis Children's CI into annual garage
sale.
~d
a
Receive a report by Me, Make Berry regarding drainage
„ problema at 1100 saline Drive.
1. Receive and consider a request from Me, Jerry Cott to
amend the approved City Council minutes of August 19,
rs,
1486.
a "j .
E
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 10, 1967
Page 2
5. Public Heartn9s
A, hold a public hearing on the request of Teasley I
Road Associates for annexation of approximately
80.82 acres being part of the James Colts 111
Survey, Abstract 288, and located northwest of
new Loop 268, north of Kings Row, and west of
Parris Road. fA-421
8. Hold a public hearing to determine the correct
name for Paige/Pockrus Road. (The %planning and
Zoning Commission-recommends Page Road.)
f'
1. Adoption o*f an ordinancq providing for the
naming.of a public street as Page Road,
C. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval- thereof will be strictlf on the basis of the Staff
recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance w}th the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be ;
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
Agenda'.' Detailed back-up information, is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, 7.8). This listing is provided
on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any
item ptlor to approval of the ordinance.
' bids and Purchase Orderst
:t 1. Did 19703 Dry Type Transformers
20 Did 19707 - Electric Motor
31 Bid 19711 - oils And Greases
1. Bid 19717 - H# rbicido a
51 Bid 1971A - Tractor/Mover Combination
C. Bid 19723 - Refuse Containers
A,jr
7. Bid 09713 - Asbestos Removal
B. Plate and Replats
E 1. , Consider approval of preliminary plat of the
Southeast Airport Addition, toot 11 Block 1.
•(The Planninq and toning Comm iaaion
recommends approval.)
i
;t
•
1
P
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 10, 1987
Page 3
2. Consider approval of preliminary replat of
Lots 1-41 Block 61 of the Northeide
Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
34 Consider approval of genoral development
plan far surrey Ridge Addition. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
C. Tax Refunds
1. Consider a tax refund to Grady Car.des in the
amount of 1Ri8.94
4. consider a tax refund to Lawyer's Title in
the amount of 4669.79
76 Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
y~y c contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or aervlces,
H, Consider adoption of , an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
Co consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
setablishirg achool safety apeed Zones on Wood
street, Ruddell Street and Davis Street.
De Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
j establishing speed :ones for east and beet bound
traffic on U4S Highway 380 from Its intersection
with interetata Highway 33 to western city'limit$*
e, Consider adoption of an ordAnance designating and
estibllshing school safety speed :ones on Fulton
$treat) Bryan atraat, Linden Drive and on
,,4y.. Crescent Street,
{~~A F. consider adoption of an ordinance emending
lx chapter 10.5 'Flood Damage'Prevantion", of the
Cod of Ordinances of the City Of Denton, Texas to
provide for adoption of the requirements of the
Federal emergency Management Agoncyi providing
for amendments theretol providing for additions
thereto and providing for deletions therewithe
i 1
i
A
V
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda i
March 10, 1987
Page 4
't G. Consider approval of an ordinance approving a
contract between the City of Denton and Deloitte
Haskins Sells for professional services
relating to an evaluation of Flow Memorial
Hospital: and declaring an effective date.
8. Resolutions
~A A. Consider approval of a resolution postponing the
regular council meeting of April 7', 1987
{ e, Consider approval of a resolution temporarily
closing Fry Street for the annual Fry Street Fair. i.
C. Consider approval of a resolution on proposed air
ti,f quality controls for Denton Coun:y.
' 9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
r " 10. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
Ir A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
r C, Personnel
AY;, D. Board Appointments
11. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future &Iendas.
12. Executive Session:
R. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 5252-17
" a g. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252.17
V4A,T.S,
Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A,T,S,
C E R T I F I CATS
' 4, ' ,x4! I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
" bulletin boar at the Cit ~al of the City of Denton, Texas,
44 on the day of 7 at $f,,r/S o'clock
'
fr tt;'~ CITY SEC ETAR YI.
25B1C '
Yr
j•'
{ '~'♦p~~N:~~FLIp _ w.,, vi'Mhbi^dlkd2.Q
i
i
f AGENDA y
CITY 08 DENTON CITY COUNCIL 1
Match 300 1987
Work Session of the City of Denton city Council on Tuesday,
March 30, 1987, at 5:30 p. m. in the Civil Defence Reom of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered3
SOD p.m.
1. Hold a discussion regarding potential funding for Plow
'F Hospital.
2. Hold a discussion on a iaiii t funding proposal for
i. drainage work in the Golden Triangle Industrial Park.
3. Executive Sessions
ry 1. Legal Matters Under Bea. 2(eArt. 6252-17
p V.A.T.S.
B. Peal Estate Under Sec. 2(f Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.6.
r' 1. Hold a discussion regarding potential sites
v for a future water treatment plant.
C. personnel/Board Appointments Under sec. 2(y),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Hold a discussion regarding the duties of
t,. the Municipal Judge and the Coact Clerk's
Office.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
March 10, 19871 at 7800 p.m, in the council Chambers of the
Municipal building at which the following items will be
considered
7t00 p.m.
a.~ t4 1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of September 20 1986, September 9, 19861 and
October 210 1986,
2; Consider approval of a request by the Denton Kiwsnis
Club to place a banner across a public street to
advertise The KiWanis Children's Clinic ainual garage
sane.
3. Receive a report by Mr. Mike Berry regarding drainage
t'" r problems at 1100 Saline Drive.
i 1. Receive and consider a request from Mr. Jerry Cott to
amend the approved City Council minutes of August 19,
1986.
c. }P' S iY~/+,~1 ~I?A~9 r.Yauw. r..:..... „ e, ..r.,.u u.v ✓"«:MY ..+..f+w.r w: 1aL+IA1.•.'i.1 Itt A3. 4
'4
T+
o. _ti
k
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 140 1987
Page 2
S, Public Hearings
A. Hold a public hearing on the request of Teasley
Road Associates For annexation of approximately
80.82 acres being part of the James Coltart
« Survey, Abstract 288, and located northwest of
new Loop 288, north of Kings Row, and west of
Parris Road. (A-42)
B, Hold a public hearing to determine the correct
name for Paige/Pockrus Road. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends Page Road.)
t t t'
" 1. Adoption of nn ordinance providing for the
naming of a public street as Page Road.
6. Consent Agenda
each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Skiff
recommen3at•.0ns, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Yanager or his designee to implement each item in
accord.ince with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the ordinance section of the
Agenda, Detailed back-up information is attaches! to the
ordinances (Agenda items 1.A, 7,S)6 Thir fisting is ;rovided
on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any
4 item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Side and Purchase Orderer
;•k
f ( 1. Bid /9703 - Dry Type Transformers
2, Bid 19707 - Electric Motor
3. Bid 19711 - Oils and Greases
4, Bid 19717 - Herbicides
S, Bid 19718 - Tractor/Mower Combination
yy"' 61 Bid 19723 - Refuse Cr"ntainers
7, Bid 19713 - Asbastur 'amoval
B. Plats and Rapists
Consider approval of preliminary plat of the
Southeast Airport Addition, Lot 1, block 1,
' (The Planning and toning Commission
° recommends approval,)
w ~f r _
i
j City of Denton City Council Agenda
! March 100 1987
Page 3
t
2. Consider approval of preliminary replat of
( Lots 1-1, Block 6, of the Northeide
Addition. (The Planning and toning
commission recommends approval.)
3. Consider approval of general development
ti t plan for surrey Ridge Addition, IThe
Planning and zoning commission recommends
approval.)
1 co Tax Refunds
14 Consider a tax refund to Grady Gandee in the
G amount of ~1278.94
' r
2. Consider a tax refund to Lawyer's Title in
the amount of 4869.78
7, Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of en ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
i` B, Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
Fcompetitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements,
Co Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
establishing school safety speed tones on Wood
Street, Ruddell Street and DaviA street.
' D. consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
establishing speed cones for east and west bound
' traffic on U'S Highway 360 from its intersection
with interstate Highway 35 to western city limits,
rK
E, Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
establishing school safety speed tones on Fulton
street, Bryan street, Linden Drive and on
crescent Street.
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Chapter 10,5 `Flood Damage Prevention", of the
Cod of Ordinances of the City of Dentono Texas to
' provide for adoption of the requirements of the
Federal Emergency Management Agencyl providing
f ;-ae for amendments theretol providing for additions
thereto and providing for deletions therewith,
7
y ,^9: ii..
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 10, 1987
Page 4
' G. Consider approval of an ordinance approv!Ma n
contract between the City of Denton and De.!.tte
;J Haskins & Sells for professional services
Memorial
relating to an ls and declaring evaluettion of Flo
effective datel
Hospita
8, Resolutions
a r
A, Consider approval of a resolution postponing the
regular council meeting of April 7, 1987
k `
sr ~;y. Be Consider approval of a resolution temporarily
closing Fry Street for the annual Fry Street Fair.
C, Consider approval of a resolution on proposed air
12 :r: quality controls for Denton County,
96 Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager,
~•$^y' 10. Official Action on Executiva Session Items:
A, Legal Matters
~ Be Real Estate
I r 'F~i
C, Personnel
T., D, Board Appointments
11, New Busineses
k
this item provides a section for Council Members to
"r' ' r suggest items for future agendas,
nC"h k' u
b 126 Executive Sessions
r S F a '
r m3'; A, Legal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Arta 6252-17
rA' V.A,T.S.
Be Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f)# Art, 6252-17
•s' V.AaT.S.
,
C, Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 1(g)
r Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S,
C E R T I P I C A T E
r:V`r I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
A r rx bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton+ exaot
o'clock
on the day of , 1987 at
~,O c (a. m,? p,m, r
PITY SECRETARY
AC'
1r ~ ~ m..... . .r. v.x.+ti^.r.r-sw+.. ~ _ .:.,,,gsry*,w~t+y~~., ✓#1 •
,
Y r"
r ' 4^+
i
UA Ell
nl v~
till
J
I'
1 1 ,
, n
1
r ~ ^r_i t ° ik ~
r t +
~r 1 „ire r''
1 r+
i1
f!
i -
X I
r ~ N
r
til FR R
~o
,R
E~5 +
-LTTT
i J ~ 1MPi°IINM+Aa r+ _ e' rwo.. •~a
+
i
j
i
CffV of DENTON, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 70201 / TELEPHONE (817) 866.8307
' Office of the City Manager
M h M U R A N D U M
s TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
i
FROM Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Hanagtr
DATE: March 6, 1987
SUBJECT: Agreement with Deloitte, Haskins and Sells regarding a
Flow Hospital study
S ✓ j L
John McGrane and I met today with representatives of Deloitte,
~
Haskins and Sells regarding a study of funding for Flow
'Hospital, We made very good progress and a formal agreeuerit is
in the final working stages. We should be able to bring this
agreement to you Tuesday night fur your consideration. I
apologize for the lateness of this issue but we have been 7
working very diligently to get all the details completed for
Tuesday night's meeting.
At the study session Tuesday evening, John McGrane will be
presenting a report on funding alternatives for Flow Hospital.
As he is finishing up final details on this project today, we
' will be sending you his report Monday evening by special
courier.
If I can answer any questions you may have about these issues,
please tail me.
Cif Managerr
jY
yA
w
2S86C
{ f
4k Y
AAA 2 SM.
i~
01
1 1 i 1
S 1 A
4
j
{
1 iW ti
y , I
'I
SKI
i
y ' ClTYo! DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 10901 / TELEPHONE (8} 7) 508.8907
Ollk» of the City M*Asgor
M F M 0 R A N D U M
' TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
~ I
FROM., Rick Svehle, Assistant City Manager
Y DATE: March S, 1997
r } SUBJECT: Request from Golden Trlangie Industrial Park
M t i. fl
Attached is some information from Jerry and Altert H. Halff
Associates about a channel in the Golden Triangle Industrial +P
Park, We concur with Jerry's memo. We think this project
would `be a good project. We would suggest that itbe
i~ considered by the Council and we will be working with the "s
developers to continue to try and promote the project. `
If you. or the Council has any further questions, we will be
,ti xS~ happy to ry and answer them at the early session on Tuesday.
Eck. V6 111a
Assistant City manager
i' s3
3359M
t
~i ,i + i. 6
I .
i
S
c
. l A
I K
,h 4 aAa+M1K .dN.w4li+aflW,l:Ki'~p.+,+.. •,y,K47t .;'f
t
' S.
,
r
1 i
.36001 Cz
' ~ ART
city of DENTON / 21 E. PhKlnney I Denton, Texas 78201
MEMORANDUM
DATE; March 2, 1987
TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
r_
FROM; Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECTS Drainage channel improvements in Block 3, Golden ;j
Triangle Industrial Park, Phase S
Enclosed are some documents from 3 of the property owners in
the Golder Triangle Addition. They are Martino Development,
' First National Leasing and Financial Corporation, and Ti~mmel
Crow.
The major channel through the industrial park is having erosion
C 3 problems on these property owners sites. They are recommending
i a project that would match City funds at about onn for one.
The City would be responsible for $45,957.00 and the developer
approximately $340000.00.
This project has been discussed previously with you an,i James
Corbin,' It was my understanding that both of you felt this was
a 'good project to present to the City Council for their
consideration. Most likely this would not be able to be funded
until the 1987.1988 fiscal year. The basic concept would not
change at that time,
Please advise if further information is needed.
Jek, P.E.
City Etjineer
0448E
t,f
i
r.
i
~I
i
L
ALBERT H. HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC.
9 ENGINEERS AND SCIES71gS
ALBERT N, NA LPP, CNAIAWN OF BOA AD '
IOJI L NOVOA, PAIJICENT CALLA) . Pl. WCAfN , NOUJT( N
HAUL WONO, JA, /ENIol Vick ^AfJ10fNf
DON 0 BAOCA. VIO! PAISUNT
WICNA11 A, AOIJLINO, VICVApICENT
TROY LYNN LOVILL,"I Oft[/10INT N11 NOATNWUT► WA J WALTIA 1. MOWN. JECAITAAY OALUB, fiAA] 7Jt1!
f OEOA01 PAAI L. JA, IINMd0/,
JlFfPEY H. ).COB ,
CAWO 1. MDoOAN
MARTINJ W.LOY June I, 1986
I AVO 8478
j f r ` r.
r -S
LOS
City of Denton
Municipal Building
215 Be McEinney
Denton, Texas 16201
I
vn Attot Mr. Jerry Clark, P.R. City Inaioser
i gel Drainage Chacotl In Coldsn Triangle Industrial park, phsge 4
h
Ta
Dear Mr, Clarks
At our meeting with Jim Pritchard on Monday may 121 1986) at the Bally
Ieauey bite) the idea was proposed to conotr+Lct a concrete pilot eheonsl is
the existing dirt channel from Kimberly Drive to Maybill Mead,
s V Enclosed are our preliminary
iaproveasets, Additional field work will o becrequiredito better eatimai*othe
amount of dirt excavation. This plan shows an alternate solution to the
erosion problves, Ve will be glad to meat with you and your stf,ff to
discuss further solutions and related coats,
If you have any quastions please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
r
rl~;t~l+l e'• , ALIBBT Is 0AW ASIOCIATIB, INC, Air,
5+ I
David Mighewonger
ff•
E DM/sla
- cei John Valsh, Trammell Crow
Jim Pritchard, fra■mell Crow
4
q~y~;ow 4wMF w.a n .w hY e i
C
i~
l t,a I
i,
j
ALBERT N. SAM A880CIATESs INC.
t} G 8616 Northwest Plasm Drive
Dallae, Tc:u 75225
e= (214) 739-0094
Client Silty of Denton Page No- )L
i -
f Project Xp den Triangla TDAUIri■1 perk-p n Date 6/1/AQ
` -Dratnage Channel 7MALQX .eet■ By D, pighawonger
STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST
,h
Item
No. Detcription Quantity unit Price Amount
11 JA" 5000 nit reinforced ronar■Le I I I
i I 1 _1 2100 ! s,y, 13 ,.18.00 18 57.Bg0.00 1
a i 1 1 ICruah ro k I 620 I , I
v It ..2S.~Q.Q._1
I I I I
{ 3 iBydrQ.ulch _ i 5 520 1 A. r. is o l0 is 4.9S2.06 1
-tlT q I A Ifl~ell~ hrn ■a■t{On. I I
' i I Soo I_c.x. I3 s,DO la 7.500.00
I I
t 1 I I BDE-TOTAL 1 6 S 1
11 L~.132,06 1
" I I lOt COYT11GRBCY
i i I I _4...Qld, 1
Tn^e r. CALI
I ~ ri-2~Q~(la
x ` i . !n■ f,. K1ft Bzxkl! t..--......~..~..
BurueXing for Darien ~._1_ -1. -..~1 !4 2alZQO~p41
I 1 1 - I -.....1
r~ I
1. 1 1 1 GUJID TOUL 1378 000,00 1
This statement was -
prepared utilising standard cost sad/or quantity estimate practice!.
It is uadecstood and y read that this is an estimate only, and that Engineer shall not be
liable to Owner or to a third party for any failure to accurately estimate the coat
and/or quantities for the project, or any part thereof.
f
f
N n".
i
,
Y =~J
t
y1
Y R,
r
a
t
s.
i
j
Febtuary 23, 1987
City of Denton
215 Es.it McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
s,
Attns Mr. Jerry Clerk,
City Engineer
channel improvements in Block 31
Res Drainage
Golden Triangle Industrial Park, Phase V
Cantlemans
We, the undersigned, propose a joint venture with the City of Danton
s"« foe isprovements to the referenced existing drainage channel. Said
h improvements would be limited to that portion of the channel lying between
Kimberly Drive and Mayhill Rood.
t N.
The existing drainage channel it an eartken channel in the native soil.
' Over the last few yeare, the channel bottom and sides have seriously eroded.
Replacing the eroded soil and regrading the channel to its original
condition would only be 'a temporary solution. In time, the channel would
erode again. Repair and maintenance of the channel will become more
diffic q t and costly as the land adjacent to the channel is devolopod .
x. 3 V4 propose the construction of ■ 10-foot wide concrete pilot channel
t,+ from Kimberly Drive to Maybill Road. The pilot channel would carry the low
flows and prevent erosion of the channel bottom. A ground cover, such ca
i gru a, could be establisbed on the channel side slopes to minimise erosion
in there areas. Constructing the pilot channel now, when a majority of the
adjacent land is still undeveloped, will be less 'costly because of easy
' access to the channel.
r
r f
ttitt "
Y
h
i
L
x
,
I
i City of Denton
f February 23, 1987
I Page 2
a.
Shown below is the estimated coat of the channel based on a preliminary
plan prepared by Albert H. Helff Associates, Inc, in June, 1986. The City
R Engineer was given a copy of the plan and the detailed cost estimate which
shows quantities and estimated prices. Also shown below is the distribution
,t of the construction costs. The actual project cost will be determined when
bids are accepted from contractors. The actual cost to each party involved
will be based on a revised coat per frontage foot using the contractor's bid
unit prices.
Project Coat v 80,000.00
One-half Project Cost S 40,000.00
Channel Length 1,410 feet
Ftontage Length 20820 feet
Cost per frontage Foot S 14.18/foot 040.OD0/2,820)
~h FRONTAGE COST
~ OWNER
1410 0 $14.18 $20,000.00
t Trammell Crow Company
First National Leasing and
Financial Corp. 495 ! $14,18 7,021.28
Hirtino Development 495 0 $14.16 7,021.28
Hayhill lost (City of Denton) 420 0 $14.18 5 9 7.44
Subtotal 40,000.00
City of Denton 40,000.00
,t TOTAL $80,000.00
t"
Y
r
The coat breakdown for each party is as follower
first National Leasing and
r+vr., Financial Corp. $ 7,021.28
s' Martino Development 7,021,28
Trammell Crow Company 20,000.00
City of Denton 45. .957.44
yK
If I
TOTAL $806000600
The estimated project cost includes the required enginesting sad
We propose that the City of Denton should be in charge of
s surveying fete,
the project coordination and contract administration since the City is
INC*
' City of Denton
February 23. 1987
Page 3
14,
Mresponsible for the maintenance of the drainage ditch. We also propose that
the City bill us for our portions of the cost at the completion of the
project.
we appreciate the cooperation we have received from the City of Denton
and look forward to the successful completion of this project.
Sincerely.
+ y { MARTINO DEVELOPMENT FIRST NATIONAL LEASING 6 TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY
FINANCIAL CORPORATION
John iialrh 7
,r 1 ray Martino 8 Le g
President Executive Vita President General partner
E cog Tray.Mlrtino. Martino Development
"r*' a 8111 Legg.- First National Leasing
John Walsh, Trammell Crow Co.
a' Jawed C. Pritchard, Trammell Crow Co.
p
John 4a19h, Trammell Crow Co.
Gary McCurl.y. Trammell Crow Co.
tiA
F
f
T '
~ l{I
J
i
LY
. "wta .w .,.w a - y `.'y
I,.•P W, w• x..-... 1C, 'W'.1-
. III . i.
Syr
If '
k
FEW
CITYofDENTOX TEXAS M!lNICIPAL 8LIILDINO/DENTON, TEXAS 7620! /7T W- aye (817) 666.8200
OFA TOFTHEN Y"Al JW"
February 25, 1987 -
~t
01
Honorable Ray Stephens
' Mlayor, City of Denton
215 East McKinney St,
Denton, Texas 76201
s Dear Mayor Stanhenai
I would like +.n.: opportunity to meet with you and the City Council on
March 10$ 1987 during the Executive Session, to discuss a few ratters
r ,
which I believe are iapactina on my ability to effectively and efficiently
pirfort and fulfill my obligations to Municipal Judge, to my ova satisfaction
and what I perceive to be you'aod the City Council's expectations of your
Municipal Judge, Some of these matters pertain to the Court Clerk's Office
and also the impact on court projacto that were initiated, I would also
t4 like to discuss the problem of an Alternate Municipal Judge, This boating
will probably require about twenty minutes, If this amount of.tima is'. 1,
j unavailable, plesso advise ms as to when I could be set on' the agenda,
Sincerely,
Sandra It, White
s
r
fC,
,
11
I 9
u.
CfTYOfDEA"N,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEYAS 70200 / TELEPHONE(817)680.8307
office of the City WOW q
M E M O R A N D U M
a
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATE: March 6, 1987
SUBJECTt Municipal Court Clerk's Update from John McGrane
%
i~ Attached please' find a memorandum from John McGrane updating
the operations of the Municipal Court Clerk's office. Since
you will be discussing this item in Executive Session Tuesday
night, 2 thought you might be interested in reviewing this
material.
111
If you hav any questions, please call me.
yi Nti
a [
rsa Lloyd Harrell
City Manager
Attachment P
r, 2587C
,t}J
Y
t tiYmcYw rw AW4V, ,
n
I.
~yyp
n
t
TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (812) 566.820
Cf TY of DSNTON, TNXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / OENTON,
V `
DATE: March 5, 1987
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
' A! PROMt John P. McGrane, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
f
in order to update you on the operations of the municipal Coact clerk's
Office, the following is a listing of activities currently going cn.
are in the process of reviewing work flow, job duties, internal
4^ . We
i
controla, etc., of the clerk's office (see attached work plan 'Exhibit
r~
~,;•6~ 2. We have developed a plan to implement the automated coact system (see
i~
attached eohedule 'Exhibit ii').
36 we are currently working with the City Attorney's Office and the City
¢1 k Manager's Office in review of the posslbi.iity of the City of Denton
becoming a coact of record. A recommendation from this committee will
~'be reported back to City Council.
We have ;
4. Hiring a supervisor for the Municipal Court operations.
worked with the Personnel Office in revising the duties and job
specifications and requirements for the Municipal Court supervisor
position and haVY advertised for such. We have received three (3)
applications and have intervtewsd two (2) of those applicants. The
final interview and decision should be made by March 20th.
5. Replacement of vacant position. Currently the Municipal Court Cletk's
office has a vacancy from a resignation from Yolanda Hernandez. We
requested her replacement on February 2, 1987, we have as of Match
w Sth, toc*ived applications fat the position from Personnel, We will
be reviewing those applications and scheduling interviews within the
r 40i'.. next two weeks.
~rF
it you need any additional information, or it you feel that we need to make
changes in the scheduling, please advise.
i
,4 Ph n P. McGrane
z l' JFMcotaf
Attachments
` 23121
~lnom...,... a..ln:L?Y1"91H~ ~^~l1 rd t•
,
s
- I
r ~
~i
A. -
y1., ,
EXHIBIT I
Page of 2
PROJECT WORK PLAN
internal Audit IKunictpal Court Clerk Division Operational Admin. Assist. on Assignment ( April 5. 1987 I
I FUNCTION SLOW I KKY AKBULT ARKA I Burr KmKR ACCOUNTABLI I OBJK IVI DKADLINI ~I
OBJKCTIVIt to study productivity and identify areas for isarovestenti
o Study work aM attempt to imp:-ove managesrnt's awareness of operations,
o Identify areas of lsprovownt in emloyee Derforrance,
o Ketablish time s:uldelines/vork rasurawnts.
o DetamLpA proper staffing levels.
o Develop a reporting system to monitor productivity and provide a basis for accountability to managempt.
o Reooaswnd improvewnts and alternative courses of action for more effective operations.
I. ACTIVITY I PUNK($) RKBP. I 890IN DATK I IND DATK l COKPLKTI I NOTts I
1. Pre-audit conference Director of Finance i 02/18/87 i 02/18/87 I I I
' I92. Introduction of project and analyst I Director of finance I 02/25/87 I 02/25/87 I ( I'
Wy'observational review of ~ Analyst I 03/02/87 ~ 03/08/87
S. PM11A
> I syiatilag data, am development of I I ! ( ( I
6MIIb'ltto anasuresents for data I I ( I I I .
I eolieotl.on 1 I I I I I
:I I I I I I
,1. gob"Uled interviews with Division I Analyst I 03/09/87 I 03/15/07 I I
r: staff members I I I I I I
goheduled interviews with key staff I I I I I I
msstbere from related divisions i Analyst i 03/09187 03/15/87
6: Formal olservation I Analyst I 03/16/81 ( 03/22/87 I I
o Automated system orientation I I I I I !
o Work flow/proesss charting I I I I I I
o flat Legging I I 1 I I I f
o Comparison I I I I I I
t'1
I I I I I r+ l
w .
w
1
> q' ,
i
1`
a
JI,
«...,rA+.»._..,.,„ . _ . , . ,%v r~ i slid
,
Pais _~L of
1- ACTIUTT i P6R80N(9) RBSP I BBGIN DATC ( RND DATE I CONPWCtL I NOTES
f'
7. Data compilation, review and I Analyst and Director + 03/23/87 i 03/29/87 I I I.
evaluation i of Finance
1 I f f f
16. ':tivelopmnt of written conclusions f Analyst I 03/30/87 I 01/05/87 I
I aed rocosewndations I I i I I
I I I
I I f f ~ .I'
I I f I I I
I
f I
f I I I I I1
i f I f I I
r I I I I
I I I , ~ I.
I I f i
*j 1 ~ I
f
A~ I I I f f I
q
¢ 'l~iZd I
sJ. Y ~ t?i Z~i ~ n F! r f - ilA1 f {Y i .+6~.i ~ Y 1 4 `I
Y'
n 1
ark' ~
EXHIBIT II
5 Y
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
(Automated Court System)
YFEBRUARY MARCH April MAY
A' Week ' Week ' Sleek ' Week
1 1 3 / 1 2 3 / 1 2 3 / [Ti 2 3
' Training
- Municipal Court Clerks
Cashiers
- Police
t Y.
Violation code Uodate
(City Attorney)
,
Procedures
yx n
Logistics 6 Completion
~k
installation
L
problem identification
[,Resolution
System Parallel
R `?f Problem Identification i Resolution ;
r
(city Attorney
Judge
finance
Municipal Clerks)
a.
}F A t Ivry
g 2246
p ft4 i 'W IIV•' .,N++wwvw w r.. i .nn r ..w0.-~Y Lf s n. kx,..uw wa , • ~ •y{i:
r I ~ i
V
266
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 2, 1986
The Council Convened into the work session at 5130 p.m. in the
city Manager's Conference Room in the Municipal Building.
PRESENTi Mayor Stephensl Mayor Pro Tem Alfordi Council
Members Alexander, Chew Hopkins, McAdams, and
Riddlesperger
ABSENTi None
1. he Council con'•ened into the Executive Session to
discuss legal mattero, real estate, personnel/board
appointments. No official action was taken.
The Council convened into the Aegular meeting at 7:00 p.m. in
} the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENTS Mayor Stephens[ Mayor Pro Tem Alfordr Council
Members Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams, and
Aiddlesptrger
ABSENT: None
Agenda item 12 was moved forward in the agenda order.
2. The Council received the presentation of awards for
beautification effort to the City.
Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks, prevented the awards.
" The winner in the residential category was Ann and John Carling
and the comm!rcial category winner was Ma. Gloria Burck for San
Jacinto Plaza.
Mayor Stepheni presented the award to the Garlings. ,
Mra. Carling stilted that it was a great honor to receive the
award, She wanted to thank America for giving them the
' opportunity to buy just a small piece of this great country.
Mayor Stephens presented the award to Me. Burck.
Ms. Burck expressed her gratitude and stated that it was a team
sw effort, ;
The Council then returned to the regular agenda order.
The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
special Called Meeting of June 190 1966 and the special called
Meeting of June 261 1966,
rr '
McAdams motion, Alexander second to epprw~s '.he Minutes as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
it rs 4 r t.
Mayor Stephens presented the cults for public hearings.
3. Public Hearings
A. The Council held A puulic heating on the proposed
1986-87 Annual Program of Services.
lbw ~
yy, The Mayor opened the public heating. '
i`
Greg Taylor addressed the Council. He was ebnee[ned about the
i, firefighters wages and referred to the general pay plan for the
City of Denton. He stated that only the firef ghters (Civil
Service employees) did not hive step raises. A program was
p submitted by the fire Department to include step raises !or the
%J
' 1FM w,e wr•w ..r.+e..., ...:4 .v aAyN.i 4a'!'i ea w: x...r. i iK~ ~ 1
I
j
i
1
267 ss
City of Denton City Council Minutes 9
September 2, 1986 s
Page Two
firefighters but it was not accepted. He asked the Council to
Isok at the inequality of the pay plan. Even the civilian
employees of the fire department received step raises. He
asked to try and equalize the pay plan for the firefighters.
Baxter Ireland addressed the council. He stated that the City
needs to cut back--that the budget could be smaller. With the
new residents in town, the tax base in larger. Hold the line
on the budget--don't increase it.
Dan Wall addressed the Council. He stated that even though
things seemed tight, he had found some inconsistencies in the
City. For example, when he went through the North Lakes Park, !
found
he the tights were on the driving rang* and the tennis
courts and no one was there. He felt that If money was tight, T
there had
to be a better way to spend money than to leave the
lights on with no one there. if the city was trying to show
the citizens that they are trying to keep the budget in lint,
the citizens would not be so opposed to paying taxes,
Karen Conner, a member of the Human Resources Committee, spoke
to the Council. She referred to the fact that in the current
budget recommendation the money for Human Resources Committee
rr agencies be kept at last year's level. She stated that the
State and Federal governments had already made cute end had
plans to make more. The Federal and State governments expected
the local governments to assist more in the support of social
service igencies. She continued that the moderate increases
that they were asking for would in no way make up for the cuts
already felt by the State and federal governments. If the
funding were to remain at last year's level, grant money would
4 j be in jeopardy, in addition to the Federal and State cuts, the
population of Denton had been growing rapidly and that increase
f was causing a greater demand for services.
Council Member Riddlesperger complemented Ms. Conner for her
work on the Human Resources Committee.
y
Peggy Keller, R.S.V.P., addressed the Council, She state: that
the agency was funded by a variety of sources but that most of
yr: those sources had already made cuts in their fund'.ng, She
stated that the local government was making cuts to local
people not just faceless people, if the services were cut, the
fat was not being cut from the programs, the necessities were.
Council Memoet Riddlesperger stated that he felt strongly for
R.S.V.P. It was not asking help for itself, it was asking help
{ for others,
1. Council Member McAdams felt that not all the programs had been
given equal time. She mentioned Handi-flop/Span. It a cut was
made there, A possible cut was being made for people to obtain
i` jobs. She compated the benefits for the young In the day care
centers with the benefits for the old In SPAN, R.S.V.P., std,
y - Barbara Lew U, asked the Council to remember the priorities
that every one of these agencies need. That cuts could effect
+ v the quality of services of not only the day care centers but
the other agencies as well.
Barbara Naplin addressed the Council regarding cuts in the
budget to the Human Resources Committee agencies. She stated
that the state funding depended o,, sustained local funding,
d
kt
"F ,
26.
8
city of Denton city council minutes
September 2, 1986 1
Page Three
Roberta Donabach of SPAN addressed the Council. She stated
that the message they are now getting from the Federal
Government is that the local communities are wanting to support
these agencies. She stated thak as a taxpayer the would look
at the quality of life here which is very good. She would
rather havQ to pay more taxes than not have the services
available.
Council Member Chew defended SPAN saying that it was a top
quality operation and really added a lot to the quality of life
r in Denton.
k} Council Member Aiddlesperger stated that Lcth facets of serving
the young and old were important. He complimented the Human
Resources Committee on the wonderful job they had done.
Council Member Alexander Stated that the comments presented had
made an impression on him and that he would take them into
' consideration when finalizing the budget.
r
r - Council Member McAdams stated that the SPAN program had been
viewed as a model to other communities and states in that they
provided the quality of services that they do with the amount
A of funding they received.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Council Member Hopkins stated that he• silence has not meant
A 'hat she was not taking into account all that wag being said.
j She appreciated the concerned citizens coming to speak to the
Council.
~y Council Member Alford stated that the Council did know what was
13 taking place and that the next two weeks would be filled with
lots of thoughcand concern.
Mayor Stephens stated that the Council appreciated the
presentations that everyone had made and that the council would
take comments and suggestions into account when finalizing the
budget.
^ 4 t, Lloyd Harrell, City Manager addressed the Council regarding
i some highlights on the budget. He stated that this budget
would allow the City to tread w►twr, with no giant steps
forward in improving the quality of life in the City but also
not slip back. The only now positions for at aft would be
revenue producing positions or positions that Nate mandated by
previous legislation. The City vas asking its employees to do
1more with not as great of pay. It would be a chaliengil lot
departments to operate this next year with all the items that
i. have been squealed down to the minimum. He slated that
revenues veto a problem for the City and that sales tax growth
had had a major drop-off as had building activities. He
S,y referred to the problem of the firefighters pay plan. He
Stated that they were trying to fund a comprahensivt look it
the entire pay plan but theta wasn't the money to do that.
financial realities dictate that the City wait another year or
two to do this comprehensive look at the pay plan. He agreed
that something needed to be looked at in regarda to the
lighting remaining on at the recreation facilities when no one
was there. He stated that procedures would be changed if
needed to correct this problem. In the Social Service scoas,
Harrell stated that while it was important to fund those
•,r agencies, the budget was tight and had to cut some in those
areas to be equitable f-31 all departments, Marcell concluded
by saying that the budget was very well prepared and that much
thought had Ions into it.
y R...w u-.......
r'
F!
~1
269
City of Denton city council minutes
September 2, 1986
Page Pour
B. The Council held a public hearing concerning the
Proposed annexation of approximately 23.6420 acres of land
being part of the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and
y beginning adjacent and north of Edwards Road approximately S
mile east of Mayhtll Road and .S mile west of Swisher Road.
• The Mayor opened the public hearing.
r.,
David Ellison, Senior Planners seated that this was s voluntary
petition and was the second public hearing. It was, a
reasonable request. The institution of annexation proceedings
would be at the special called meeting of September 23, 1986.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
4. Consent Agenda
ay, ,
rlL
McAdams motion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda as
prevented. Motion carried unanimously.
' Consent Agendas
A. Bids and Purchase Orders
1. Bid 19632 - Underground duct bank system
2. Bid 19644 - CIP utilities Airport Road
sanitary sewer
B. Plats and Replatst
Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the N. V. Hannon Subdivision, tots 2 and 3.
ITne Planning and 2oninq commission
'y+ recommends approval.)
y ; 2. Approval of preliminary and final eeplat of
.r the Wooded Acres Subdivision, Lot 2, block 4.
('the Planning and toning Commission
recommends approval.)
C. Change Orders
1. Consider approval of Change Order 11 to Bid
% 1 9609, Purchase order 1 73633 for the
r
9t E.1rt-8dine Project.
S. Ordinances
F• A. Tre Council considered adoption of in ordinance
nM ° accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
c The following ordinance was presentedi
Rc' a N0. 06-171
t;
AN ORDINANCE ACCIPHNG COMPS+ITIVE 0109 AND PROVIDING
FOR THE AWAAO OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR
IMPROVEMENTS) PROVIDING FOR THE EKPENDITURE OF FUNDS
TNEREFOA1 AND PROVIDING FOR AN tPFCCTIVt DATC!
M 'f
,
o'
r _ t
br a•. . r .e. ...:u+P CRY- r
'
Y
" : Y'
270 1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 2, 1986
Page Five 1
Riddleaperger motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On
` 9011 Call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
`u Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "eye," Chew "aye," and Mayor ?
Stephens aye." Notion carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a request for a Change in zoning from the single
family (SP-10) district to the planned development (PDI PENN
classification on an 18.24 acre tract located at the northeast
corner of U.S. Highway 100 and Old North Road. The property is
( further described as a tract in the Caawell Carter Survey,
r„ Abstract 275, and the P. S. Longbottom Survey, Abstract 775.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 56-I72
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TONING MAP OF THE MY OF
DENTON# TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
THE CODE Cf ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-10 AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP
7 APPLIES TO 18.24 ACRES Of LAND LOCATED AT THE
r NORTHEAST CORNER OF U.S. HIGHWAY 190 AND OLD NORTH
ROAD, AS 19 MORS PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN: TO
y,^ PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN EONING CLASSIFICATION FROM
SINGLE-FAMILY "SF-1D" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT
Y, CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION: PROVIDING FOR
y APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOR SAID DISTRICTI AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
r Alexander motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, Mc4dams "aye," Alexander "ayes" Holkina "eye,"
Stephens""ayeRMotionpcarried"unanimously. "aye, and mayor
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a request lot a change in toning from the
" Agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PDI
classification and approval of a concept plan on a 412,12 acre
r tract in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract 1269. The property
is located on the west side of FM 2164 approximately 108SO feet
^sq north of Hercules Lane. (E-1015)
The following ordinance was presented:
NO, 86-171
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE S041NO NAP OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
THE CODE Of ORDINANCES OF THE CITY Of DENT0140 TEXAS
BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 412.12 ACRES Of LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE Of F.M. 2164: APPROXIMATELY 1,050 FEET NORTH OF
HERCULES LANE, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN) TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN 90NING
CLASSIFICATION PROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED
r; DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND U91
OESIONATION: PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN
FOR SAID DISTRICTI AND PROVIDING FDA AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
4 r'
a
k. Y'N1fia. ..r C9.FS w:.., ..z. , sr b.w.. 1' ,i.
14
S'a
' 271
3
City of Denton city council minutes
September 2, 1986
Page Six
Alford motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
+ call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye," Aiddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor
e Ste}hens aye," Motion carried unanimously.
a
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
• abandoning and vacating certain utility easements,
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that this was a
utility easement which Brazos used as a transmission line for a
new power plant. This was a quit claim and was giving the
property back to the reeldents in the area.
The following ordinance was presented=
it NO. 86-174
' i AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY
EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED HEREINr AND DECLARING AN
f EFFECTIVE DATE.
Aiddlesperger motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance, On
roll call vote, McAdams 'eye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye,' and Mayor
` Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
L. Ths Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending water rate schedule w3 ("Water Sale for Resale to
y Governmental Agencies, Divisions or Subdivisions"), as adopted
§ j by ordinance No, 64-137, to provide for a revised rate for such
sales made by contract after June 1, 1946.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities grated that the rate needed
to be applied .to the water We. The rate consultants had
looked at the date and recommended it along with the Public
Utility Board.
Mayor Stephens asked if this was treated water,
;4R Nelson replied yes that it was treated water that came from
Dallas.
I Stephens asked it this would affect the water treatment plant
`y as the City had more of these types of sales.
Nelson replied yes and that this contract With Lake Cities was
41 an interim contract which would allow Like Cities to buy a
piece of the new water plant and be a joint owner with the City. X.
t
The following ordinance was present4di
~ r
NO. 66-176
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING WATER RATE SCHEDULE W3 ("WATEA
g SALE POX RESALE TO GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, DIVISIONS OR
SUBDIVISIONS"), AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO, 64-137, TO
PROVIDE FOR A REVISED RATE FOR SUCd SALES MADE BY
6 CONTRACT ALTER JUNE It 1966i AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
l`. Hopkina motion, McAdams second to adopt the Ordinance, On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "Ays," Hopkins "aye,"
4 Alford "aye," Aiddleepsrgar "aye," Chew "eye, and Mayor
> Stepheni "aye." Motion carried unanimously,
i
~'}•A+ ~ ~a-..- .-a..;..w.. _ n , . 'anti. u.~~..xvs ^'^.;`k.k, ~ I'a
l
}
6
272
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 2, 1986
Page Seven
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a conttact for the City's participation in the cost
of installing an oversized sewer main.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that the school
district was proposing an elementary school on Hickory Creek
Road. They needed to extend a sewer line which required only a
!0" line but the regional area requited a 1S" line. The Public
Utility Board recommended approval.
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. eS-176
r.. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
` PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF INSTALLING AN OVERSIZE
SEWER MAINZ AUTHORISING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
CONTRACTo APPROVING THE EXPENDITUAE OF FUNDS
THERtfoRE" AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
ad, Alford "aye," Aiddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor
Y1 Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously,
ti
' C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance .
1 providing for one-way traffic west bound on Highland Street
from Welch Street to Avenue A and on Highland Street from
Avenue D to Avenue E.
Rick Svehla Assistant City Manager stated that At the August
t meeting the Traffic Safety Support Commission reviewed the
request from North Texas. The ptesont ttaffic flow was
cohfusing and the Traffic Commission was recommending that
Highland Wome'ona-way,
Mayor Stephens asked if the Commission was Aware of the impact
that was going to be made at the cornet of Welch and Avenue A
if a traffic light was not installed at the same time as the
* change in traffic flow,
Svehla replied that staff looked at the fact that it Highland
was one-way going west that one of the conflicting movements
was eliminated.
Stephens motions chew second to table the ordinance for further
j study. Motion failed on a 5-2 vote with Alexander, Alford,
Li Riddiospergef, Hopkins and McAdams casting the "nay" votes.
mayor ate hen@ stated that he felt an overall stud should be
r done before any action was taken and to look at the overall
r a area before Changes were made.
Svehla stated that there was a signal at Isgls and Welch being
d ° planned. The Commission looked At the directions that occur in
r that area. There wore conflicting movements in the arN which
` could be streamlined by making the $treat all one-way or all
two-WAY. NTBU had asked to make the street all one-way. A
is traffic count had nit boon done but it probably would not meet
the standards required for a signals Council Member Alexander stated that he would like to go on the
it FAcommsndstion of the Traffic Safety Committee, They had
s reviewed it and the council should deter to their judgment,
•
Y'
~1 t
~B 1
5~3
.
'4
a
.
A
I
1
273 Y
City of Denton City council minutes
September 7, 1985
Page Eight
Hopkins motion, Riddlerperger second to adopt the ordinance
with the amendment that it not be implemented until the new
t signal at Welch and Eagle was operative. Hopkins amended the
c motion directing the City Attorney to amend the ordinance as f
4 stated above. "On roll call vote, McAdams "aye, Alexander
aye, Hopkins aye," Alford *aye*" Riddlespsrger "aye," Chew
ynnay," and Mayor Stephens *nay," Notion carried wia 5-Z
is prohibiting he Council considered adoption of an ordinance
a 9 the parking of vehicles on the west side of Austin
Street from its intersection with Pecan Street to its
[ Intersection with East Oak Street.
J Rick Svehle, Assistant City Manager, stated that this request
was from Mr. Joe Hopkins who owned the property adjacent to the
request. This ordinance would remove the parking along the
Ot ' side of his building where the underground parking garage was.
The Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended approval.
The following ordinance was presentedt
NO. 65-177
f AN ORDINANCE PAOHIBITING THE PARKING Of VEHICLES ON
THE WEST SIDE Of AUSTIN STREET PROM ITS INTERSECTION
WITH PdCAN STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH EAST OAK
j STREETr PROVIDING A SEV£RABILITY CLAUSE] PROVIDING A
d PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS) AND
} DECLAAING AN EPPEC'PtVE DATE,
x
H
opkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
Call
AlfordvoIaye,"MAAidaiespirger A"iye,Qe Chew e1raye,tkiind "Mayor
Stephens aye, Motion carried unanimously.
6. Resolutlona
a r
° appointing the hspecialcititene Advisory Committee on scapital
rt + improvements,
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that tnir resolution would
formally appoint the Special Citiaens Advisory Committee on
capital improvements. There were approximately Sl individuals
j on the committee which would take the capital imNgovemento
pro tam as aabmitted by the Planning and toning Commission,
ravtew the document, make ouggestiona to the Council for
a modifications.
{ - t The following raolutlor, vas presentedr
a
R E 8 0 L U T I 0
r In accordance with the Resolution of the City Council
adopt ad on the 15th day of July, 1966, the following
i individuals ate hereby appointed to serve as members of the
Special Citizens Advisory Committee on Capital ImproVomentar
Karen Abernathy Elinor Hughes
Hugh Ayer Dave Erause
a Geneva Berg Jo Luksr
Komar Ely Darla McDade
r' 7 6111 Brady Jack Miller
5 x
~I
tI
+ ' wbt'ttN. s
I J
y s
.
J'
rt a
1, 274 ~
t City of Denton City Council Minutes
September i, 1986
Page Nine '
Derrell Bulls Allis Miller
Lucy Campbell Ralph Morrison
Mike Campbell Clovis Morrison, Jr.
Sill Claiborne Bettye Myers
Jake Craven Xathy Orr
Bob Crouch Lisa Patterson
Bill Crouch Fred Patterson
5 Frank Davila William P. Phillips
Roberta Donsbach Harold Reed, Jr.
George Edwards Larry Reynolds
John Eniow Richard Salasar
Haxel Frederick Joe Short
Robbie Gober Chuck Smith
Bob Gorton But Smith
't Helen Halley Don Smith
° Tom Harpool Benny Snider
John Harris Donna Trammell
+i Lloyd Hindman Ld Wolski
iilJ Joe Holland Donald Wright, President
Ann Houston A. E. Wyatt
John Hugheo
SECTION II.
°
That it shall be the charge of said committee to make
recommendations to the City Council on the manner of Implementing
qR,,.Y the City's five-year Capital Improvements Plan,
SECT AN 111.
That this resolution shell become efftettve immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the Ind day of September, 1986.
ATE, H S O AFREII
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
CHARLOTTE E Y CI ECA A Y
a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMr
& DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
Sys
A;
McAdams motion, Chow second that the resolution be approved. On
war' toll call vote, McAdams "ate," Alexander ",V1,on" Hopkins Nays,'
Alford "aye," Riddlesper9er sys," Chew "aye, ad Mayor Stephens
~y Nays," Motion carried unanimously.
The council considered approval of sanitary sewer
1service outside the City limits for Mr, Ray L. Baker.
d
Bob Nelson, Ditsctor of Utilities, stated that Mr. Baker lived
tic in the forest Ridge area had requestod sewer service. There
Was a sewer lihe directly behind his property that could easily
serve the ptoperty, The Public Dt littes Board recommended
approval.
r
Y r
1
11
Yw W..a a!rr ";A' Y-. • . r N . .P:. - ..z lfiF'k'sYJir P rr a w..... - t»
l e It,
;ar
+
275
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September i, 1986
Page Ten
t
Chew motion, Alexander to approve the sanitary sewer service
r outside the City limits. Motion carried unanimously,
at The Council considered approval of sanitary sewer
service outside the City limits for M3. Norma Harrison.
r, Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that this was the
exect situation as Mr. Baker, in fact, Ms. Harrison was a
neighbor of Mr. Baker's. The Public Utilities Board
recommended approval.
' Riddlesperger motion, Alexander second to approve the sanitary
sewer service outside the Qlty limits. Motion carried
unanimously.
A 9. The Council received an update on ?low Memorial
Hospital.
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that she was pleased to
report that the attorneys met last Wednesday for approximately
1 hours and reached a tentative solution so that the issue of
i.. the deed could be resolved. it was unfortunate that some
agreements and thatnitahad been deliberate. a felt stalled
that each
attorney was doing his best to represent the interest of his
respective clients. With respect to the deed, the City was of
i a different interpretation than the hospital's attorneys, A
compromise had been reached and it involved the fact that the
City and the County would have thc. option to purchase the
C ' hospital property in the event that the hospital ceased to be
r operated as a non-profit corporation providing hospital
services. The option to purchase would take place with nominal
consideration, i.e. $1D, but would be only able to be exercised
after the City, and County had given notice to the hospital
corporation thbt they were not in compliance with the
i' conditions of the deed, When the negotiations took places
everyone agreed to present to his respective clients, deadlines
f, { within which the hospital would have the right to recommence as
a non-profit corporation and/or provide hospital services as
t the case might be. The City felt that a lengthy period in
which the hospital would have an opportunity to cure the
defaults, would not be necessary becauee you either had
e non-profit status or you had a letter from the IRS saying you
are not a 6010 corporation. Moreover, if hospital services
+ were being provided on the property by a physician, nurses, it
{ doesn't intail that ovary single unit or room be operational,
but that hospital services of some sort are being provided on
yr. the hospital property, for !hose reasons, the City did not
feel that a long notice period was necessary, It was hot
understanding from het attorneys, that the hospital attorneys
had asked that as long as the hospital corporation was using
due diligence to cure the alleged default, the City and the
Y County could not exorcist it's option. This was something the
K,t Council had to decide on, It was not really a legal issue, it
I was a question of how the Council would like to proceed on this
matter, it should be pointed out that even with resolution of
1 this matter, there would still remain a number of atepp9
necessary that must be taken prior to the Closing of thio
property, The only actions that remain necessary on the part
of the City and the County are the appointment of the bard of
. ; Advisors and two other steps which would lake pla(!O right at
' closing to list of all outstanding malpractice claims and a
detarminatlon of 0hother or not to use Hill-Burton eligibility
f' d f standards).
N r- v
j
.w F;a,.. y.,a
M
F y' ;
x
Ld~ l
276 i
{ City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 7, 1996
Page Eleven
t 1
Council Member Alexander asked if the difference in what the
City had anticipated would be the came and what the hospital
attorneys had recommended, was that a due diligence clause was
added to the agreement, Was that the only real difference
which would have the effect of s longer of period of time, in
all probability, before the City and the County could make the
repurchase.
Ftr Drayovitch replied yea. She went on to explain that it went a
little bit further than that. The City also Wanted to insert a
due diligence clause, but the City felt that there should be a
time limit on that of perhaps six months to a year, The City
felt that within a year some sort of hospital services could be
s 4 offered even if the entire facility were destroyed. The result
r. 1 of the open-ended clause as opposed to having ■ fixed limit,
like sir months or a year, was that at any point if the city
!4 wished to exercise the option and the hospital was not in
i f agreement, we would be forced into litigation which would
j possibly go on for a good long while.
5 1
Council member Hopkins asked if the hospital was not in
agreement with the time limit.
#t Drayovitch responded that the hospital felt that so long as
they could prove that they were using due diligence, that the
option would not ae triggered.
j Council Member McAdams stated that in effect the hospital could
be operating with the IRS having said it was no longer a
non-profit corporation but they could continue to operate and JI
the City in effect would not have any option for however long
the hospital said they were being dili•lent in trying to get
t*i,t that opinion rever.led.
Drayovitch atatOd that that was exactly right.
Council Member Alexander stated that this mechanism would also
E require the City and County to come agreement to actually file
the suit.
SF R~,
D nyovitch stated yes if the City were danced she option to
repurchase. This still did provide for a very strong remedy in
the case of non-compliance or a violation of the covenants. It
was the strongest remedy she thought the City could have.
Council Member Alexander stated that the primary argument for
~Y r
the des diligence clause without time restrictions on the pert
of the attorneys for the hospital was that Viet kind of
fi provision would enhance the ability of the hospltsl to provide
financing.
Drayovitcn stated yes for the option to repurchase as opposed
s to an automatic reverter,
Alexander asked why the hospital was unwilling to put on i
reasonable time limit. What was the logic and argument behind
' their side of that position,
of Drayovitch ro)lied that she felt that it she were on the other
aide, she wield fight for the very @&me thing. She would
nagotiots to y,te as much flexibility and to much protection as
- . , she could.
Council Member McAdams was troubled by the fact that if the
intention of the three groups was to salvage the hospital and
do this at quickly is possible, why was it being fought out as
t r.
44,0 'j
277
' i City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 2, 1986
Page Twelve
though we were loge and demanding every possible protection in f
j terms of them having es long as possible to hang on to that
rather than having it revert if it ceases to operate as a
non-profit institution.
Drayovitch stated that she had articulated that same thought at
Wednesday's meeting. Going back to the very first charge of
the Blue Ribbon Commlttae, the thread throughout all of these
past months, was the reason why the City and county were not
+ selling to a tor-profit institution was because of this group's
pledge to continue to operate a non-profit hospital providing
r public health care services.
y Council Member McAdams stated that it was very clear to her
that neither the city not the County wanted to operate the
: hospital and that was why they were trying to pass it on to
someone else. Why would 61e hospital corporation think that
the City would want to take it back.
Drayovitch stated that that was another reason why the option
to repurchase was favorable to the City because it need not, if
the City or County did not wish to exercise it, they were not
x}", bound to it. But at the a•me time, if something were to happen
P and the continuation of those services were in jeopardy, It the
f governmental bodies decided that they wished to continue, they
would have the opportunity.
y Council Member Riddlesparger stated that he felt this was in
example of how the lawyers had been arguing for three or tour
k months. Lai people cannot understand why these three eat of
lawyer; can t get together in a concept that the Council and
I the Commissioners Court had agreed to the basic concept, why
they can't get together and do it. ;he City was allowing the
hospital to bleed to death while arguing over incidental
µ matters. Tho,,agreement was simple enough that they would
return the hospital, they would give us a chance to buy it back
it it did not operate as a hospital, He felt that was all that
was necessary to put in there. He would recommend that the
City accept the concept presented here and go ahead and fix the
contract.
4+ Council Member Mekdams stated that she had a real concern that
the County and the City were in agreement on the issue that
they don't really want the hospital back, However, if it would
case* to be a public-type hospital, the City wanted to make
certain that they could get that facility back if they desired
T;,e r and somehow provide that service to the people in the county.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he felt at times that
the lawyers were trying to kill flow. The doctors and the
people that he qi y were depending upon Were saying that the
City vie not doi its job.
yl t Council Member Hopkins asked the Attorney it she felt the
hospital would accept any type of time frame or were they
against any time limit.
A,
Drayovitch stated that it was to be open ended.
Hopkins asked if Drayovitch felt the city was protected enough
t, in this instance since it could possibly go to litigation.
Drayovitch replied that it was a more significant protection
than what was originally proposed,
° x
,E
Ir `
f . / ' i
278
City of Denton city council minutes s
September 2t 1966
Page Thirteen
t~
1 Council Member Alexande.* asked the attorney if the Council
i needed some type of motion or action to give her direction.
' Mayor Stephens replied that the Council could not give her
motions as the item was just to receive an update.
! Drayovitch asked if the Council was willing to accept the
proposal of Mr. Butterfield on behalf of the hospital. ..r
Council Members MCAdams and Chew replied no.
The Council considered the agenda addendum bef,,re them.
i'
~ Agenda Addendum
f 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authoris'ng the purchase of .3231 acres of real property for
{ street improvement purposes, said property being situated in
` the City of Dentont Texas and being part of the S. McCracken
Survey, Abstract No. 811.
The following ordinance was presented.
B&` N0. 86-178
J, t AN ORDINANCE AUTHORICING THE PURCHASE OF AN EASEMENT
FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS SAID EASEMENT CONTAININO
APPROXIMATELY .3231 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE S.
MCCRACKEN SURVEr, ABSTRNCT 50. 817, IN THE CITY OF
DENTONt TEXAS AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
? HEREINt AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
F
Chew motlcn, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call voter McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," HOIXins "aye,"
Altord "Ayet". Riddleaperger "aye," Chew "ayes and Mayor
t Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
? The Council then returned to the regular agenda Ordet.
tea 100 The Council received a report on miscellaneous mattots
`r from the City Manager.
city Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that the City task force
had been appointed to minitor the Health Depirtmcnt and how
that issue was
progressing. The task lore was attending a
briefing that evening being held by the Con,!aissioners Court.
!
d Y i 11. New Business
No items of New business were suggested by Council
~'r ( Members for future agendas.
} 12. The Council convened into the Executive Session to
F~ discuss legal matters, real astatet and personnel/board
fi
appointments.
The Council reconvened into open session In the City Manager's
Conference Room, Municipal Building.
r~
Debra Drayoviteh, City Attorney stated that she had been in
contact with one of the hospital's attorneys and had discussed
s the open-ended part of the contract. She stated that he felt
that 6 months would be acceptable if open-ended with s total
destruction. He was not speaking for any of the other lawyers
tr but only for himselfo
n
r3 f .
J
, .....,Ay. , ..a : ,v.w.y ,.,.rat:
i
n ' k
'
r
f '
L
City of Denton City Council Minutes 279
September 7, 1986
Page Fourteen
It was the consensus of opinion of the Council to move on
agreement and see what would develop. this
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
RAY STEPNE
. MAYOR
4 JENNIFER IMRIE
DEPUTY CITY SICRETARY
.r
.
r
is
1
,
Ir
n
{ lI ~
pf 01910
T ~ ~r
~ U
~ ~+w 1
Q Fn .I
s'
I
i 117
N& A
i
280
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 9, 1966
+ The council convened into thA joint Work session at 5:30 p,m. with
~a the Planning and toning Comrission in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building.
j. PRESENTS Mayor Steinenst May Pro Tom Alford] Council Members"'
S' Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and Aiddlesperger
Planning and toning Commission Members Holt, Cannon,
a.
Brock, Claiborne, Cole and Eseue ,
y' ABSENT: None
' 1. The Council held a discussion of intensity policies in
' eastern Denton between U,S, 380 and I-35.
1d' Cecile Carson, Crbe,n Planner, reported that the staff had been
P looking at land use planning in the five quadrants of the City for
growth, current trends, how this growth and trends would affect
>r Denton in the future and how to change the policy to beat suit
cc ! Denton, She gave Some projected growth figures for Denton in the
areas of population, housing and transportation, It was staff's
P, recommendation that three moderate intensity nodes be developed
;i along the following areast U.S. 360, McKinney Street, and 1-35.
The petitioner had submitted a land use request for five moderate
intensity nodes in this area. Staff had objections in that as the
five nodes developed they would enlarge, join ind soon overlap.
There were problems associated with the five nodes in that there
might be a shift in growth to the eastern quadrant with less
I interest to develop in other areas of the City, The City would
still be responsible for those services in other parts of the City.
From the utility standpoint, the City would also be forced to !.viid
in that seotion of town because of the cost for the oversising.
' There would also be a need to increase the sewer plant. Stcetts
would also be a consideration as collector streets would receive
more traffic and would need upgrading.
t
Commissioner Claiborne asked what kind of fiscal impact the five
p`;l nodes would have on tht CIP program,
Carson replied that ttere would be an obvious shift in demand for
Services by higher density/intensity areas but that the funds would
have to be balanced so that other areas would not be neglected.
3 ' j Claiborne asked how the average rate payer would be effected if
kk development and growth in this area were greater than other pacts of
the city,
e^ .y
Carson replied that she did not know. She stated that projections
would have greater density in one location but that the population
growth would be for the Whole City, Other areas would have lees
population.
Council Member Alexander asked for a
development. projected time frame lot the
Carson replied that no final plan had been submitted but that the
original development his a 20 year plan for total build-out.
r
„a 01
r
p,
~rt
~ .n d J".:o-x. of +
~ _,,rJ,A 7 tik
ti
281 i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1996 1
Page 1 ii
t
Claiborne asked Carson to describe the workings of the Land Use
Planning Committee.
r E Carson replied that they had had a map planning session mapping
growth for the City.
Claiborne asked about Pecan Creek drainage west of Loop 266,
s
t, Carson replied that there was a natural flow along the creek and
F, would need the flood area to remain so that the creek could flow
h into that area. Soma additional building would be needed to
redirect/rechannel the water elsewhere to insure no flooding.
Mayor Stephens asked if the P6tiA maps were accurate.
Carson replied that the actual msps may be accurate but that the
final development may change and thus change the maps.
Council Member Alexander asked if the developer was responsible for
~r> ^ the development of the drainage so as to be sufficient for present
r needs and needs in the future.
Carson stated that the drainage was a very technical aspect which
requires a study on how the drainage would affect their development
and how it would affect other developments.
Council Member McAdams stated that the basic system was the place to
3 start. It would not work to io back and put the utilities in
later. The basic system had to be funded first.
4x,} Council Member Chew stated that he would recommend balanced growth
in all parts of the city.
Commissioner Claiborne recommended three nodes of growth. This
III would distribute the fiscal impact on the City.
Mayor Stephens asked if there would be a commercial strip similar to
University Drive.
Y.
`a Claiborne replied that a five node system may create another
Vi'c" , University Drive.
Council Member Chew stated that some commercial strips were
necessary for help with utility bills,
Council Member McAdams stated that nodes of commercial businaases
4 would be fine but no strip of commercial businesses.
r 1 Commissioner Brock stated that the commercial development would Act
be reduced but rather distributed throughout the area and not
4f,? concentrated in one area.
Consensus of the Council was to limit the area to throe nodes of
developmo&,
2. The Council held a discustion of the first come - first
f Serve intensity allocation procedure.
Steve fanning stated that traditional district toning system to
probable as mucn individual policies AS anything, It had been
written in 1919 with broad system categories. Currently staff was
trying to look it individual developers and • ecillc individuals,
However# the system was written to do something different.
~h
i
~ i
2 8 2
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1986
Page 1
* He offered the following suggestions: start with work sessions
before formal advertising, look at planning with allocations, if the
current intensity is already over standards loolp at ways to
` accommodate planning instead of getting hung up on numbers, and if
not over standards, do other types of planning.
Claiborne stated that now the first in with the most get the best
and would recommend immediate discontinuation of this practice,
i•_ r
Mayor Stephens asked that if each individual case was looked at, how
l' would you keep from over building the area.
' Claiborne replied that the Denton Development Guide policies would
have to be retniorced and to look more at specific planning areas.
Solt stated that first come - first serve could not be done away
with entirely. Eventually you would have to may no more intensity
is left for your proposed development but he did not have a specific
plan.
Council Member Riddlesperger suggested that the developer be called
in to see what others in the area were going to do. He also
suggested a group meeting with the developers in the area to see
what would be developed.
Holt suggested that perhaps the undeveloped owners could be notified
as to what was going to be built around them.
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel/board appointments. No
official action was taken.
The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7100 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
g' PRESENT: Mayor Stephenst Mayor Pro Tem Alford: Council Members
y~ +r Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and Riddlesperger
F
ABSENTS None
1. Resolutions
A. The Council considered adoption of a resolution
~'r allocating $42 on the tax rate to the General Debt Service Fund
$6 only.
Lloyd Harrell, city Managtr, stated that this resolution was a
written ea cession of the intent that the proceeds from the
additional .02 tax rate would be specifically earmarked and placed
5 in the General Debt Retirement Fund of the City and would not be
available for any kind of General Operating Expenses, if some of
the issue were not approved by the voters or if the Council decided
at a later point to not go forward with any kind of bond issue
proposal, the proceeds from the levy would remain in the Debt
Retirement Fund and would be available for the following year to be
able to reduce the debt retirement levy.
t Council Member Riddlesperger complimented the Manager for the
excellent job he and his staff had done on preparing the budget,
- 14
`n.
t
r" ;
f p;
Ix"
i
i
Au,
i t
283
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1986
Page /
council
Chew agerst
commendedetherMan
and aYtha an excellent J had been ated ortfor the upc mingoresolution. done and
Council Member Alexander stated that the resolution made very good
sense. He too complimented the Manager and staff for putting
together an excellent budget document.
The following resolution was presented=
~t
r -
R E S O L U T I O N
t WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has made its
FF recommendation for a five year Capital Improvement Plan to the City
6t Cooncil1 and
WHEREAS, the City Council has estsblishel s citizens
C
wit ommittee to review the proposed capital Improvement Plan together
' theh Planningopandd Eoningl improvements
Cmake ity recommendat tons to
thereto) and
relative
' i WHEREAS, a bond election and bond sale may be necessary to
provide funding for the Capital Improvements Program)
}k .Y NOW, THEREFORE, BE If RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I.
r
is That it a $0.59 tax rate (per one hundred dollar valuation)
approved by ordinance of the City Council, $0.57 (per one hundred
dollar valuation) of said f0.59 would be necessary to provide
j funding for the City's current 2986-87 maintenance and operation
budget and the existing debt service requirements of fiscal
1986-87.
year
"
'f SECTION it.
one hundreCa
dollar valuat will the proceeds ion)from t ebed•'itional $0.02 tax'rate Iper f
pS Debt Service Retirement fund it order h aced in the City s general
x a any additional debt serf ice reSu f help defray the coats of
Improvements Program, temants needed to fund a Capital
SECTION III.
That, in the event no program is recommended, of tae voters
4 )ail to approve the construction of the
Improvements,_ the proceeds from the additional proposed capital
hundred dollar valuation) will remain in the General.DebtSafvico
s Fund, and be available to pay future year dabt service requirements
on existing outstanding debt, and allow reductions in the debt
service levy of future years.
h
PASSED AND APPxOVED this the 9th day of Septembar, 1986.
a`
t
RAY STEPHEHS, MAYO
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
a
10
i :
s ~
r ,
~ t.
,
.
284
city or Denton City Council minutes
c, Meeting of September 9, 1986 a
Page S
i
ATTEST:
H, CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
d DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITL:2, CITY ATTORNEY f
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ..r
t
BY.
Chex motion, McAdams Second that the resolution be approved. On
" roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkiis "aye,"
1 Alford aye, Riddlesperger 'Aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"eye." Motion carried unanimously.
2. Lrdinancea
' A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
setting the tax rate for fiscal year 1986-B7,
1 The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-179
V AN ORDINANCE LEVYING THE AD VALOREM TAX OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE YEAR 1986, AT THE RATE OF $0.59 PER
$10n,00 ASSESSED EVALUATION ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN
.r f THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY ON JANUARY It 19861 NOT
EXEMPT BY LAW; PROVIDING REVENUES FOR PAYMENT OF CURRENT
MUNICIPAL EXPENSES, AND FOR INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON
OUTSTANDING CITY Of DENTON BONDS; PROVIDING FOR LIMITED
i EXEMPTIONS OF CERTAIN HOMESTEADS; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT
OF COLLECTIONS[ PROVIDING FOR A SEVERASILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
~s Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
Vote, McAdams "aye," " Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "eye,"
x, Riddl,sperger "aye, Chew "aye," and mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and
landi being instituting annexation of approximately 132.61 acres of
part of the O. Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and part of
x - the W. "that Survey, Abstract 300, and beginning at a, point
.C approximately one mile south of FM 126 (East McKinney) and one and
ono-half miles nortft of T-3:£.
Cecile Casson, Urbn Planner,: seated that this was the institution
~r of annexation and the final action would be October 21, 1986,
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 06-
~sr 'I
.Y AN ORDINANCE ANNEXINO A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO TUB CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BEING ALL THAT LOT,
' TRACT OR PARCEL Of LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 132.61
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
~:r > t' DENTO107, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE G, WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1330; AND PART OF THE W. DURHAM SURVEY,
ABSIAACT 300# DENTON COUNTY, TEXASI CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS
AOAtCULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
r
*a
7 11
.uia`1
285
City of Denton Cit} Council minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1986
Page 6
' McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. on roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "eye,' Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
f. Riddlesferger "aye," chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Notion
` carried unanimously.
3. The Council considered authorizing the Mayor to establish a
Denton Bicentennial of the United States Constitution Committee.
Mayor Stephens stated that this would be part of s national
committee. The committee was just beginning and would last until
1989. He suggested that the chairman of the committee be
Dr. John Kincaid.
• Alexander motion, Hopkins second to approve the authorisation.
Motion carried unanimously.
2 e. The Council received a report and held a discussion on the
reorganization proposal for the County Health Department. ,
Paulette Owens-Holmes stated that clinical and environmental
services would have the same assessment. Health service fees had
been increased significantly. This bad caused a lower per capita
i rate resulting in lower assessment rates for all participating
municipalities. Contracts would be submitted by the 15th of the
month. The contract would be presented at the next meeting.
kl~ Council Member Chew commended the task force for its outstanding job.
Council Member McAdams expressed some concern that while the amount
a that the City was paying was going down, someone else was paying for
the difference. The Intent was to provide basic services to
q everyone and perhaps now everyone may not be able to pay for those
services. She expresses concern that perhaps people would not get
their children immunized now because of the increased costs to them.
R? Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the City's $51,000 figure
a,f was probably an interim step and may increase in the future. ;
The Council convened into the Work Session in the Civil Defense Room
of the Municipal Building
The Council received a report on the 1986 City Council
goals and priotitiea.
The first report received was on Plow Hospital.
€ Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that they were following the
schedule as planned and would report back when the dates came up.
She stated that the list on flow showed the outstanding steps that
1 stilt remained. The deed was being prepared and will be sent out on
Wedheedap the 10t1h. The hospital attorneys have the option to look
"i at it and make any changes they felt were necessary. As coon as
this is done0 the other steps would be started. She stated that an
approximate completion data would be in a maximum of 6 weeks.
Q`: a
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that the delays were Very
painful to flow and pressed to get all the steps done as quickly as a
possible.
ti _7
I A'A
rr
°31 ~M
ry
~ j
286
y ' City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1986
Page J
Council Member Aiddlesperger stated that he had spoken with a
retired doctor in the community and he appreciated the way the City
was pushing to save Flow.
Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager, presented the report on
Economic Development. She stated that this was a preliminary
report, that the committee bad met two times. The report vas an
organization of the committee's brainstorming. The report tta had sCommi r
taken into account policies of the City that may hamper development,
r` the research by the Cott Committee, and participation in a study for
economic development. The Economic Development office at the
xw Chamber of commerce should be ready by January. McKean continued
that before the next elections and retreat a final report would be
'Nix". ready as well as a master plan.
Council member Stephens stated that he felt the committee should
,g have at least one Council member and one Public Utilities Board
j' member on it.
i
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that the make-up of the
committee had been recommended by the Public Utilities Board.
P
e Stephens felt that more than one Council member was needed for
monitory situations.
Nelson stated that the Council was important and that he Could
approach the Public Utilities Board and ask to substitute a Council
member for one of ft's members.
Stephens stated that two representatives from the City was
{ inadequate and there should be at least 1/3 of the committee members
° r frosa the City if not more.
Harrell replied that there were staff members also on the committee j
r 4 Cod tha he would make the list of staff members available to the
uncil.
Harrell replied that there was a delicate balance between the
Chamber and the City. The Chamber wanted to keep the committee more
" in the realm of the Chamber and not too much with the City.
Stephens asked if It was the conaensus of the Council that the
sake-up of the committee be one Public Utilities Board member, the
r. City Manager, the two Assistant City Managers and two Council
members,
x Council Member Alexander wanted to stay sensitive to the Chamber of
x= - Commerce, He indicated that pethaps the Council could suggest the
make-up rather than mandate the make-up.
Council Member Hopkins Concurred with Alexander. '
Stephens stated that the Chamber may welcome the added interest by
the Council.
Council Member Chew stated that he did not think this would be a
problem for the Chamber.
Council Member Alford stated that in all likelihood not all Council
" Members would be able to attend at the same time anyway and thus the
Kea,`" _ Council would always be represented if there were two members to the
Committee.
S
t . F-;
7~•
r
0 281
{ City of Denton city council minutes
meeting of September 9r 1986
ii Page 8
i i McKean then gave a report on the separate steps outlined in the
backup for Economic Development. Some additional steps that were
F„ suggested were to host a,i annual City Breakfast for local industry
heads to discuss Denton and economic forecasts, participation in the
National Institute of Trade to help exporting of local goods
{ produced bete in Denton, and expansion of the airport. The
11 Committee would continue to meet and would report it's findings to
Council.
t.
Kayo[ Stephens reported that the Texas Economic Commission would
have a representative, Phyllis Mc Mahn, here in Denton on Tuesday,
the 16th to discuss what the Economic commission could do for Denton.
6% Steve Brinkman, Director of Parke, presented the report to the
i , Council on Space Needs. He stated that City Hall and the Police
fi } Department had already used up all available square footage. The
e committee had discussed both short term and long term decisions.
The committee felt that future efforts should be to build rather
i- than to rent. Short term needs included expansion of City gall,
build a new law/court facility which would free-up the old police
ks: department for additional space. Future options would be to have
professional help to assist in a long term plan.
r1V, Council Member Riddlesperger stated that it would be wise to hire a
consultant to study space needs. He wondered about a second floor
for the present City Hall.
a/
F a~ Lloyd Harrellr City Manage[, elated that staff had had some similar
14. conclusions. He also suggested branching of utility departments
throughout the City ani to lock ahead for office complexes in
downtown Denton for long-range plans.
Council Member Alexander asked where a new police department would
be.
` Brinkman replied that the location was not as critical as for the
fire department but should probably be along one major street. He
stated that the committee would continue to look at options and
g;. report back to the Council.
p'` 3. The Council received a report on miscellaneous matters from
the City Manager.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell stated that he would be going to
SK Greenville for s TMPA meeting. Those Council Members interested
were invited to attend also. They would be leaving at 8:30 a.m. and
i ~ would be back by 200 p.m. {
Due to an annexation schedule, it would be necessary to meet on the
23rd for a short special meeting. The meeting would begin at
e 5:00 p.m. and would be very short.
c He asked which Council members would be attending TML in Houston,
E " He stated that in conjunction with the TML meeting there would be a
b,+ special trip to Austin on October 10 for the Select Committee
Meeting on Education.
He also asked if anyone would be interested in touring the Gibbons
~F Creek Power Plant. Plans were not made at this time.
i
J H ~
a .
5 k
7J
n
TI y
lg '
i
l
1
288
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 9, 1986
Page 9
"u
3. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, warxeatalken estate, pI-eonnel/board appointments. No
official action
.
i
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
y
~4-
"r RAY STEPH6NS, MAYORy
a,
e
JENNIPEI SMAIE, DEPUTY '
1.~ CITY SECRETAAY
,4
,i
MWti 1
Ewe .
ky r !y
ee
t k
1~<; 1579•
t
P~
'F"1'1nrw`1f'Y a f n
~ s"~.rar:,sw.~,dlvm.+WiY.as ad.y ..y'e4 t~ 1;
5 r n ~ ly
r ~ r r
V
" f~J
61,
city council minutes
i
~ October Iir lgab i
The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m, in the Civil
j Defense Room of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens, Mayor Pro Tem Alfordl Council Members
Fi Alexander, Chew, McAdams and Riddlesperger
kt.
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENT: Council Member Hopkins was out of town on vacation
1. The council held a discussion on proposed preliminary plat
of the Fig Art jacent and south of PM 21alevacrossnfrom Hickory Creek acres nHome
t ad
Park, approximately 1.1 miles south of Hickory Creek Road within the
extraterritorial 3uriediction of the City of Denton for the purpose
of determining whether to begin the annexation process,
r David Ellison, Senior Planner, clarified the area in question on a
' map which displayed the City of Denton and City of Corinth agreement
line. If a 500 feet strip was annexed, the total area would be
approximately 43 acres. The Hickory Creek Mobile Home Park was
slightly offset from the proposed annexation site to the north and
la east, The Issue which had triggered the discussion of annexation
was a proposal for a light aluminum metal fabrication plant on this
tract. The proposed use would have 110 feet of frontage on fM 2101
and was adjacent to the east to the Jaymar commercial plumbing
facility, The Planning staff felt this area could no longer be
considered as remote due to the Hickory Creek Mobile Home Park and
Jaymar. A plat had not yet been filed for the proposed metal
fabrication plant. There were various alternatives the Council
could consider. If the Council directed staff to begin annexation
procedures at this time, the annexation process would take
+ approximately five months to complete. During this time, the
developer could file a preliminary and final plat and begin
construction. If this occurred, zoning would not be an issue.
However, if a problem arose with the plats or other procedural
matters, the City could complete the annexation and the developer
would be required to petition for light industrial zoning prior to
construction. The question was whether to begin annexation to
benefit this use and other uses and try to stop light industrial q
strip uses or not. The down side was the Impeding of
employment generating operations. possible
Ellison further reported that Council could direct staff to begin
annexation on just this parcel, or a larger area or to only monitor
activity at this time, He then presented slides of the entire area.
The consensus of the Council was to proceed with annexation
procedures for a 500 feet or 1,000 feet strip so as to take in the
} specific tract being targeted for the metal fabrication plant.
2. The Council held ^ discussion regarding future membership
in the North Texas Commission,
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that this item nod been
discussed by the Council on October 1. Council had requested staff
to contact the Chamber of Commetce to get their opinion. Tht agenda
back-up material included a letter from Chuck Carpenter of the
Chamtar as well as a li.ting of the major cities in the area who
:rare members of the North Texas Commission. Mr. Carpenter's letter
state) that the Chamhar felt there was value in remaining in the
Commission# but e,gjested the City consider a 419000 membership
rather than the .core expensive full membership, However, Staff did
not feel the 41,000 membership would be useful. A survey of other
cities ha; supported the opinion that the City probably would not
recoup the membership fee investment) however, the North Texas
Commission with economic development on a regional scale.
!C
r
I F rv. a 1V"~11 .
R
Cad` / ~ 'I.
u
r
N'
k,
,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of OCtboeL 21, 1946
Page 2
Mayor Stephens stated that he had spoken with Chancellor Hurley of
North Texas State University. Dr. Hurley felt the new leadership at
4 the North Texas Commission would be moving toward high technology
ventures which would benefit not only the university, but the
community as well.
Council Member Alexander stated he felt this issue should be
i reviewed carefully and it would be unwise for the City of Denton to
withdraw from the North Texas Commission at this time.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated he felt Denton should be a part
of this regional organization in light of the commitment to economic
: development.
` Council Member Chew stated that he would like to have the Executive
j I Director appeared before the Council and discuss what the North
Texas Commission was currently doing.
i
t, The consensus of the Council was to invite staff representatives
j from the North Texas Commission to meet with the City Council on
November 4 at the 6:00 p.m. work session.
' 3. The Council considered giving staff direction regarding
I engineering work on the Oak-Hickory street improvement project.
y R ck Svehla, Assistant city manager, reported that several options
were available. Both Oak and Hickory Could be converted to all
one-way from Bonnie area to the Downtown Square. For the section at
Avenue c, one option was three lanes of 37 feet width or three lanes ;
of 45 feet width. The 4! feet width would allow for a parking lane[
however, the 31 feet width would be less costly. The design rhould
be decided on as quickly as ppossible due to the process of haviig to
go through the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commissior. prior to
10-final approval oy the City Council. All of this would have to be
sJ accomplished before bidding and construction could begin.
Council Member Alexander stated that he had received telepbone calls
J' from residents on Oak Street who were concerned that the change
1•; would increase traffic flow. This, coupled with the loss of
Y' 1 on-street parkiny spaces, would have an adverse effect on the
neighborhood.
T
Svehla reported that this project could be delayed until the first
of the year.
4. The Council received a report on the Utility Department
c ti Manigecent Study by Br. Littlefield.
city Manager Lloyd Harrell called on Mr. Roland Laney, Chairman of
the Public Utilities' Board, to introduce Dr. Littlefield.
'?s Mr. Roland Laney stated that the Public Utilities' Board had seen a
need for this type study two yearn ago. This was a preliminary
study exploring how the Utility Department operated and interfaced
,r with other City departments prior to the technical study which was
required by the City Charter, fns purpose of the study was to
establish goals for the Utility Department prior to hiring a
v. consultant to perform the required Charter study.
Dr. Littlefield reported that this study had focused on
opportunities to improve management and to make a good utility
system even better by obtaining ideas from within the system. Input
had been received from approximately thirty-five utility manager
{J; level persons as well as personnel from other departments, He had
played a coordinating role in the information gathering process.
This had lead to constructive discussions and many good ideas had
been expressed and subsequently implemented. Dr. Littlefield "then
gave an overview of the organization of the study.
Y
. "3
,
y
Y
City of Denton city council minutes 5
Meeting of October 21, 1996
' Page 3
r Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported
had Deen that he felt this study
S. a good tool In helping the various work grow Ps to do a
r self -analysis. Input had been received from the staff and the
a;r Public Utilities, Board, Concerns !lad been expressed regarding
' positions which were difficult to staff end with
Utility Department liaison with the the
Data Processing Department. It
was Celt that further analysis would be needed.
i City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that he agreed with
f Dr. Littlefield's comments, The study had looked at a system which
was working well and was attempting to "fine tune it', which was
Preferable to studying an operation which was in trouble and trying
to make it work. There had not been any startling news discovered
by the study but rather valid points which had been raised,
x, Council Member Riddlesperger asked if this study took the place of a
review done by experts in the utility field or was this a different
approach.
Laney responded not this had been a rather unique approach in that
the study did not examine the technology of producing electricity,
but rather at ways to improve internal departmental operations as
well as relations with other City departments, The study which was
required by the City Charter would deal with all of the technical
issues. The management report did not address impact fees, any TMPA
issues, long-term elec'.ical supply issues, etc.
• Mr. Ed Coomes, member of the Public Utilities' Board, asked the
+ Council to review pages 76 through 9D of the management report with
special attention.
Mr. Kenneth Frady, member of the Public Utilities' Board, reiterated
Mr. Coomea's remarks and asked the Council to read the report as see
what the Utility Department was and how they could improve.
The Council convened Into the Executive Session to discuss att official action wasltakenete, and personnel/ooard appointments, No
The Council then the Council Chamberrnvened into the Regular Meeting at 7110 p,m, in
PRESENT1 Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem Alford; Council Members
Alexander, Chew, McAdams and Riddlesperger
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENT: Council Member Hopkins was out of town on vacation
1. The Council considered approval of a request by the Jane
Marshall School toy place a banner across s public street to
advertise a Children s Vine nrte Series,
a Chew motion, McAdams secord to approve the request. Motion carried
t unanimously.
v
2. The Council received l report from the CIP Committee and
consider approval of a date to hold a public hearing regarding the
proposed CIP program.
Dr. Hugh Ayer, Chairman of the Capital Improvement Project s
Committee, reported that he appreciated the opportunity to appear
before the Ciit Council and this had been a fine committee to
r chair, He than extended thanks to the fifty members of the Citizens
a Blue Ribbon Committee as well as the City of Denton staff for their
r,4 superb support. A special thinks was then extended to the five
subcommittee chairpersons Jack Miller; Bill Claiborne, Joe Holland,
are Kathy Orr and Bob Lorton, A lot of work had been done from
t
September 1 to September 30, The Committee mad been nn field trips,
fit @ ~ ! >t.~'~t
1
x r
y'
e
1 City of Denton City Council Minutes i
t , Meeting of October 21, 1986 {
,lr Page 4
! t
zI,I 1
Fri had met several times and had received input from citizens. All the
K, f Information from the subcommittees was forwarded to the chairperson
by October Dollars needed to be trimmed and too many projects
( were placed during the first years of the five year time schedule.
f The Committee had submitted $7,000,000 of pprojiects during the first
year and this needed to be reduced to f3,500,D00. The chairpersons
of the subcommittees met on October S and discussed stretching the
time frames or deleting projects. The recommend ationa had recelveo
c unanimous approval by the subcommittee chairpersons. The full
Committee met again on October 13 and unanimously voted approval of
the revised plan. The Planning and Zoning Committee tied also
unanimously voted approval of the five year plan on October 15. The
rt Council must keep in mind that this time was a long range program
and it did not contain any fluff. The CIP recommendation in its
entirety was very similar to the Planning and Zoning recommendations
however, the CIP had proposed some changes and deletions to the
original Planning and Zoning recommendation. The total package
totaled $21,6J7,0u0. The timing of the projects had been
recommended based on three consideratlonst priority neeaa Isuch as
the recreation center in southeast Dentoa)t State government
E planning for highway projects (such as the Loma Del Rey drainage
projeet)i and the financial facts of life (how much could the City
r of Denton absorb in debt service).
Ayers then presented the following slides.
BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
FOR CITY OF DENTON
° FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
OCTOBER 15, 1956)
,r°. 1986-19 B 1
go;+ TOTAL: $304630000
1
t~ STREETS/TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT COST
Lillian Miller Parkway Widening ¢ 450,000
Turn Lanes 230,000
y Upgrade of Carroll 6 University Signal Systems 170,000
New Signal installations 145,000
Signal at Loop 255 and US 300 640000
* Evers Park Sidewalk 40,000
~r9 Traffic Study 25,000"j
Sidewalk on Hercules is 000 I
y ATHLETIC FIELDS/NEIGHS)RHOOD AND SENIOR CIIIIEN CENTERS
r. ft PROJECT COST I
F ! East community center $1,2000000
Athletic field Development SO 000
r $T 50,00 i
DRAINAGE
.r PROJECT
COST
~t. Taylor Park Drainage
Woodrow Bridge 250,000
Pecan Creek Drainage 110,000
AUdra Lane Drainage 90,000
Burning iced Drainage 64,000
Stuart/Selene Drainage 50
E Study Drainage Regulations 5.L000
L. ,
cv t
Al:
{
~ n
~ A
a
A
i.
}
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
x.". Meeting of October 21, 1986
Page 5
Y ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXPANSION
PROJECT COST
t• Animal Control Center Expansion X185,000
BIUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ,
FOR CITY OP DENTON j
'I^ PIPE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
g OCTOBER 150 1986)
1967-1988
i
f TOTAL: $3,6120000
g STREETS/TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT COST
Improve Woodrow Lane #
i j Rebuilding of Existing Bell Avenue 525,000
(with present alignment) 450,000 i
Mingo Road Traffic 6 Drainage Improvements 250,000
Teasley Lane 200,000
Traffic Study, Phase 11 75,OOD
Traffic Signals
;TE
ANN
° o
ATHLErIC PIELDS/NEIGHBORHOOD AND SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS
R` T~
PROJECT COST
7f
Senior Center Expansion 750,000
Athletic Field Development 550 000 „
key,,
111
DRAINAGE
Y d
PROJECT COST
Willow Springs Drainage 1337,000
Melons Street Drainage 2S0,000 i
Burning Use Bridge
y Teasley Lane arelnage 150,000
50 000
BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
FOR -CITY F DSNT'ON
x PIYE YEAR APITAL IMP V ENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
y OCTOBER Is* 1986)
z '•i„ ; °,f 1988-1989
S
TOTAL: X30615,000
ATBLETIC FIELDS/NEIGHBORNOOb AND bENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS >
tl PROJECT COST
Neighbothiod Center =1,300,000
t Athletic Field Development 250 000
;rib36
i
i
II~r , 1. .
a
City of Denton City Council Minutes '
Meeting of October 21, 1986
Page 6
I
FIRE StATION AND EQUIPMENT
PROJECT COST
Fire St+tion 500,000
Fire Equipment #200 000
#76b~3d5
n ` DRAINAGE
t .r
' PROJECT
COST
Update Master Drainage Plan #421,000
R
+
P LIBRARY EXPANSION
ti PROJECT COST
Land Acquisition/Parking Development #400,000
for Library Expansion
4
STREETS/tRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION
it PROJECT COST
f°. FM 2181 (Teasley Lanes Four-Lane divided #250,000 y'
from IN-35E South to Ryan Road
Davis Street Paving 50,000
Avenue E improvements (Eagle Or, to IN-35 Service Ad.( 440000
#
LANIENFORCEMENT CENTER/COURT COMPLEX n
PROJECT CO"
➢
! Plans for Lew Enforcement/Court Complex #200,000
%It
}I
,s
A' , BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECCMMENDATION
FOR CITY AF DENTON
r FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENt PLAN
,
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
t r OCTOBER 15, 1986)
989.1990
st w TOTALS $5,125,000
} STREETS/TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION
x'
PROJECT COST
LOOP 288/Local participation! Fout-Lane $202000000
p~ divided f90m US 380 South t0 near i8-35C
Jj US 380/Local Participations Six-Lane 400,000
divided from us 17 (Locust) to LOOP 388
Erpanaion Of Nottingham (ftom us 380 s'
to Mingo Road SOD,000
US 380 Right-of-Way Acquisition
r 250 000
~ #'jrS30 ob'D
-M1 t .ig6'wi'<J+"4r :Y.'/k a rid qq
F
!fir ~ A.:y .'~Y
d ♦0
w t i
Ild
Y£
C
i {
I
City of Denton city council minutes
Meeting of October 21, 1996
Page 1
DRAINAGE
` PROJECT COST
Lome Del Rey Drainage 525,000
Stuart/SUnnydals Drainage 350,000
Drainage Improvements in Holly Hill area 300 000
d 41-0
Y: LAN ENFORCEMENT CENTER/COURT COMPLEX
PROJECT COSZ
Law Enforcement/Court Complex `500,000
BLUE RIBBON CITIiENIS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
FOR CITY OP DENTON
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND IONI,iG COMMISSION,
' OCTOBER 15, 19861
1990-1991
t 4.
TOTALi ;5,6221000
i
LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER/COURT COMPLEX
s. '
PROJECT COST
r
Law Enforcement/Court Complex $1,900,000
ATHLETIC FIELDS/NEIGRBORBOOD AND SENIOR CICIIEN CENTERS
IC, 'ri~ PROJECT COST
} Neighborhood Cents[ 410400,000
t Athletic Field Development 150 000
q. + $10650:000
,
(
STREETS TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION
r rr
P OJECT COST
Fort 'lorth Drive IDS 37111 four-Lane $1,065,000
G +i i diAid6d frca IH-35E to FM 1830
Recenafruction of Oriole Street 117LO.00.
LIBRARY EXPANSION
T COST
Library Expansion $6000000
.i
D.QAT;IAGE
i~ PROJECT COST
fort North Drive/James Street Drainage $900000
t
1 I _.,.i...,.~..w~nn»,r~.«.N. ar 4•r1.WVSk~x~ Si~y x ~ } 1 ,
v
4
~y
~ I
a
,
City of Denton City Council Micates
Meeting of October 21, '986
(i Page 8
+ BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COY:4ITTEE RECOMMENDATION
' FOR CITY OP DENTON
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
OCT08ER 15, 19861
y " STREETS/TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION
1986-1981
PROJECT COST
Lillian Miller Parkway Widening 450,000
Turn Lanes 230,000
Upgrade of Carroll & University Signal Systems 170,000
New Signal Installations 145,000
Signal at Loop 288 and US 380 64,000
Evers Perk Sidewalk 40,000
Traffic Study 25,000
Sidewalk on Hercules is 000
~ 1 159 000
I'~. 1987-1988
Improve Woodrow Lane $25,000
Rebuilding of existing sell Avenue 4500090
(with present alignment)
1 Mingo Road Traffic s Drainage Improvements 250,000
Teasley Lane 200,000
i Traffic Study, Phase It 75,000
Traffic Signals 25 000
, 5 5, 0 0
,~'1988-1989
ti ; p x( FM 2181 (Teasley Lane)c four-Lana divided 250,000
q from t9-35E South to Ryan Road
Davis Street F wing 50,000
Avenue E ImproveTents (Eagle Dr, to IN-15 Service Rd.1 40,000
a ~ 7iv U00
%
1989-1990
Loop 28840c al Participationi Pouc-Lane $302001000
divided from US 380 south to near I9-159
US 380/Local Participation$ Six-Lane 600,000
divided from US 77 (Locust) to Loop 288
Expansi0a of Nottingham (from US 380 5000000
to Mingo Road
US 380 Right-of-Way Acquisition ; 2_ p5 ~00~0
yc r 1990-1931 (
Fort Worth Drive (US 37711 tour-Lens $1,0650000
divided from 19-35E to rM 1830
'I Reconstruction of Oriole Street 317 000
' i $1
S
Nc
~r
I°
4
!A FIB
Y~1 1 ' L«~s.~M-++e~u. s•... . . ..r;temt~, YYYnw,1.V'xNd1.+>r.rn ..r y~ d
T 7 """'ti
STS ~
g
q
City of Denton city council Minutes
_ Meeting of October 21, 1986
Page 9
r' BLUE RIB30N CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
FOR CITY OF DENTON
s.( FIVE YEA TA I ENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED by PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
OCTOBER 15, 1986)
E ATHLETIC FIELOS/NEIGHBORHOOD AND SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS j
r a
` 1986-87 i
(ti
PROJECT COST
East Community Center ¢1,2000000
x' Athletic Pield Development 50 000
i987-1988
Senior Center Expansion
p. Athle;ic Field Development ~~550,000,~
;1,3DDrDDD ,
1988-1989
Neighborhood Center X1,300 000
Athletic Field Development 250.000
~;~L,550,000
w `
1990-1991
d tr j, Neighborhood Center $1,490,000 j
Athletic Field Development 450 000
Y ~
y ~p
o t 8'SII~D'b'C r~
f xf~ I f Y 4
BLUE AI880H CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
FOR CITY OF M1111 ON
FIVE YEAR M ENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED 89 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
OCTOBER 15, 1966)
w RAD IMAGE
s~ tfj 1956-19A7
f ors i„S3' PROJECT COST
+r ' Taylor Park Drainage X300 u00
' Woodrow Bridge 2501000
F Pecan Creek Drainage 110,000
Audra Lane Drainage 90,000
k Burning Tree Drainage 64,000
.~R4~ Stuart/Selene Drainage 500000
Study Drainage Regulations 5 0 0
r a
r,
L +b. Y'~ had+G.W W+
,
6 I
9
f
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of October 21, 1986
' Page 10
~ 1987-19AB
r
PROJECT COST
Willow Springs Drainage 317 000
Malone Street Drainage 2500000
1I1I Burning Tree Bridge 150,000
Teasley Lane Drainage 50000
1I
.i': , , 1988-1989
Update Master Drainage Plan $1250000
1969-1990
,l Lome Del Rey Drainage $ 625,000
I Stuart/SUnnydals Drainage 150,000
1 Ij Drainage Improvements in Holly Hill area 100.000
~1,275,0Do
ti iE 1990-1991
Fort Worth Drive/James Street Drainage $900000
1'.
BLUE RIBBON CITISEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
kf FOR CITY OF DENTON
Five YEAR IM YE ENS PLAN
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNINO AND IONINO COMMISSION,
OCTOBER ISO 1986)
,
LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER/COURT COMPLEX
1998-1989
PROJECT COS
Plane for Law Enforcement/Court Complex $200,000
a
' `rl 1989-1990 '
Law enforcement/Court Complex $5000000
1990-1991
Law enforcement/Court Complex $10900,000 y
t
1* ~
1 t r +
M
I
' r• sa ,-r..r. ..•wn. Y.1'+r:N.WifW;;~}~;J"ar+F~QJLaR4~'•: .q wf :•q{J.+s 4+
+ p 4*
a
4`4
1. p l :
' t^
z `
,e
City of Denton City Council minutes
Keating of October 21, 1986
t° Page 11
BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
FOR CITY OP DENTON
FIVE YEAR CA T IMPROVE ENT PLAN
r I ,
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
OCTOBER IS, 19861
r
y' LIBRARY EXPANSION
y+ i
19ea-19e9
^ PROJECT COST
Land Acquisition/Parking Development $1000000
for Library Expansion
1990-1991
Library Expansion ;600,000
BLUE RIBBON CITIZEN'S COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
} FIVE YEAR K ENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED Of PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
6 E OCTOBER 15, 19861
:'V t ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER EXPANSION
' I
r ,
' ~ ( 1986-1987
PROJECT COS T
F t ~r
Animel Control Center expansion $185,000 r'
Y
BLUE RIBBON CITIIEM'S COMMITTEE PECOMMENDATION
FOR CITY-0F DENTON
FIYE YEAR CA ITAL IMPRCIY MENT PLAN
(ACCEPTED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION,
OCTOBER 15, 1966)
r.
L. 1 FIRE STATION AND EQUIPMENT
198a-1989
P JECT COST
Pile Station $S MO 00 {
lire Equipment 200 000
rsl w;, ~ DOr00
Ayer• concluded by stating that the Capital Improvements Committee
additionally recommended that a public hearing be held by the city
r~,tr Council, They further recommended that a select committee of five ;
to six persons be selected for the life of the projects to monitor
progress. This select committee would meat once a year during the
* " < { five year program to review and report to the citizens of Denton the a'!
11'
~ l
.»..wti.♦ ,M .w~. ..e . ♦r Ph wAX.A I"rt0rAM'. .x .~.y.'q.fw L1W 1
3
I City of Denton city council minutes
Meeting of October 21, 1986
` Page 12 ii
P Progreso of the program. This would relieve the minds of the
citizens that the projects were being funded with bond money. The
s f final recommendation of the Capital improvements Committee was that
the propositions should be listed on the ballot in the following
orders street and trafficr dreinagel anisai controls fire station
and equipments athletic fields, community and senior citizens
centers library expansions law enforcement and court center.
Chew motion, Alexander second to set October 26 as the date for a
public hearing on the CIP recommendations at 7:00 p.m, in the city
Council Chambers.
Mayor Stephens asked that the announcement in the newspaper should
,nl also include that a copy of the CIP committee proposal was available
in the Office of the City Secretary and in the Public Library.
Motion carried unanimously.
k' Council Member Chew stated that the five subcommittee chairpersons
and Hugh Ayers should be appointed as the standing monitoring CIP
Committee.
3. The Council held an appearance by Mr. Carl Williams to
discuss Police Officers working as security guards while still in
City of Denton uniform.
' This item was passed in the agenda order as Me. Williams was not
present.
6. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
~ - Paul Hastings, representing Golden Triangle Joint Venture,
4 requesting approval of a detailed plan, including the preliminary
's plat of Golden Triangle/Michael's Addition, on a 3.2371 acre tract
TY which is included in a planned development (PD-6). The property is
located on Colorado Boulevard northwest of oop 288 and shown in the
J. S. Taft Survey No. 1256. If approved, the property may be
utilized for 370850 square feet of retail and restaurant space.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Paul Hastings, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that he
thanked David Ellison and Cecile Carson for their assistance and
support in this petition. He was the architect representing the
owner and would be glad to respond to any questions.
i
5 No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David e31ison, Senior Planner, reported that five reply forms had y
' been mailed with zero returne. A restaurant and retail use would
soon be under aonatr+sction. The Planning ■nd coning Commission had
' recommended approval 6 to 1 with the desenting vote cast because no
landscape plan was submitted.
n" r 1, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
? approving a detailed plan on a 3.2371 Acre tract which is included
in a planned development PD-6.
The following ordinance was pcesenteds
pay
E
~J
1
w w
~ n
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of October 21, 1986
Page 13
NO. 66-209
s AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A DETAILED PLAN FOR A PORTION OF THE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-350 AS SAID DETAILED PLAN APPLIES TO 3.2 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON COLORADO BOULEVARD, NORTHWEST OF HIGHWAY LOOP
288, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN! PROVIDING
FR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIM AMOUNT OF 1,.00
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PPOVIDIJNG FOR AN EFFECTIVEODATE. FOR
f
Chew motion, Alford second that the ordinance be adopted. On toll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unaniiroualy,
B. The Council held a public hearing on the pet.tion of
Burke Engineering, representing Bill Roberds, requesting a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) to the planned development district
and approval of a concept plan on a $8.662 acre tract located west
0f North Locust IFM 2164) and northwest of Hercules Lane. The
property is more fully described in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract
> 1288. If approved, the
following land uses; Planned development would permit the
General Retail - 2.84 acres
Multi-Family - 11.10 acres, 190 total units,
witi a density of Carden/Townhouse - 1.271 acres p , 7per acre
4 total units,
with a density of 10.2 units pet acre
i , Single Family-7 - 16.64 acres, 76 total units,
with a density of 4,1 unite per acre
j Greenbelt - 18.81 4ores Z-1835
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
f e Mr. Brian Burke/.Burke Engineering, spoke in favor stating that his
^t firm had worked with staff and the neighbors on this petition and
° felt all involved were in agreement.
r, 'r?
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that this petition had been
before the Planning and Zoning Commission in June, 19dS and had oven
denied. The area had been relooked and resubmitted. The Planning
ar.d Zoning Commission felt that this was probably the best that the
City would get. There had been eight reply forms mailed with zero
returned,
1. The Council donsidered adoption of An crdina%ce
approving a chahga in zoning and concept plan on a $8.662 Agra tract
located west of North Locust (PM 21641 and northwest of Hercules
Lana.
" a
My 't The following ordinance was presented,
r a NO, 86-210
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF INS CITY OF DFM',1)N,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE vF
ORDIXANCES OF I" CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLtS9 TO 56.6 ACRES Of
LAND LOCATED NEST OF NORTH LOCUST STREET IF.M. 2164) AND
NORTHWEST Of OtACULES LANG, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED H8RIINt TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM AGAICU;TURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIPICFTtON
e. AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" 01STAtCT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE .ESIGNATIONI PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL
4xS OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOR SA!D DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN {
r { EFFECTIVE DATE.
r
1{J
r
,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
meeting of October 21, 1986
Page 14
Alexander motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye ' .Alexander 'aye," Alford "ayet"
Riddle aperger 'aye," Chew "aye,I nd Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
S. Consent Agenda
c 1 McAdams motion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented.
1
Consent Agenda:
A. Bide and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid 1 9652 - Precast will construction
i' 2. Bid 1 9656 - North Locust Street paving and
drainage
j
3. Bid 1 9659 - Concrete poles
4. Purchase order 1 75417 to R 6 P Properties, Inc.
in the amount of $27,560.50
r _ 5. Purchase Order 1 75735 to General Electric
Company in the amount of $19,230.00
Purchase Order 1 75742 to Thermo Tech Inc. in the
amount of ;16,662.00
7. Purchase order 1 75803 to Xerox Corporation in
the amount of $20,041.00
i S. Change orders:
. i,
P+r' t 1Change Order 1 1 to Bid 1 9643 - CIP utilities
Loo 188 30" water line - to reduce the contract
by 41,25D.00
6. Ordinances
A. Tre Council considered adoption of an ordinance
,r A fir} accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
t for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services.
The following ordinance was presented$
N0. 86-211
4
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
a CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES
Sr OR SERVICESI PROVIDING FOR' THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREPOR31 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motions McAdams second that the ordinance be adopted. On tell
call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander *aye r" Alford "aye
Riddlespetger "eye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously,
n
7.44'. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
x r '3r "i accepting competitive bids ar,d providing for the award of contracts
for public works or improvemrn.s,
,.r. 'r ern The following ordinance will Ittlent4d3
r~~A N0. 8d~i11
L7 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR
THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS$ y.
y' PROVIDINO FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEAEFORI AND
PROVIDING, FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
•wnu u.d xn..... ,..,..k'w.n rb .it aMi;A'#-M,rtC'. ,V;~y. M
.h 41'
. a'!.
14..
4
9
City of Denton City Council minutes
meeting of October 21, 1986
Pigs 1S
Chew motion, Alford Second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
"aye," M hews "eyeet" and x Mayor "Stephenefo" "ye~MOtfon Riddlesperger
€ unanimously. aye
carrled
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of
materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the sta ofocompetitive bides law exempting such purchases from requirements
lb* following ordinance was presentedt
NO. 86-213
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR TH8 EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
} SERVICES IN ACCOADANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SfATE LAW
li EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETlfIVE
s
BIDS: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams second to adopt "the ordinance.
v
" " Y Alexander a e Alford "aye o* On roll caall
aye, Chew "aye, and mayor Stephens "aye." ~Motionlcarried
unanimously.
0. The Council considered adoption of ordinance and
service plan annexing approximately 132.64 acres of land being part
of the G. Welker Survey, Abstract No, 1330, and part of the W.
Durham survey, Abstract No. 300, and beginning at a point
x approximately one mile south of fM 426 (East McKinney) and one and
a,. one-half miles north of 2-3SE. A-37
tai City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that this was the final action 9
on this annexation.
The following ordinance was presenteds
o NO, 86-214
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: BEING ALL TART LOT,
TetACT OR PARCEL QF I\ND CGNSIS'fING OF APPROXIMATELY 132.64
I ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, S'fATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE G, WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 13301 AND PART OF THE W, DURHAM
"i SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 100, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS: CLASSIFYING
THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY! AND
{
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chtw srcond that the ordinance be adopted. On roll
call vote, McAdams ale, Alexander "aye," Alford "aye)"
Aiddlespefgar "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
4 E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
establishing a fee for defensive driving courses taught by and
administered by the City of Denton, Texas,
,ek Harlan Jefferson, Administrative Assistant) reported that over the
w, last twelve years the City of Denton nad been teaching Defensive
a Driving it a minimum charge to citirenS. The 401t to the city would
e increasing and staff wanted to increase the fees to the minimum
i ; b
of .
i5 '
1Y1~Ti.] }y r Al
;r, 1 ,
I '
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of October 21, 1966
Page 16
The following ordinance was presented,
N0. 86-215
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR DEFENSIVE DRIVING
COURSES TAUGHT AND ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF DENTON#
TEXAS AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On Coll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "Ayer" Alford "aye," Riddlesperger
"aye,", Chew "eye," and mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanously.
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving an agreement between the City of Denton and the Denton
Chamber of Commerce providing for a program to promote economic
development.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that this item had been
discussed on several occasions and he did not wish to belabor the
issues however, this was a new initiative to join hands with the
private sector through the Chamber of Commerce to make real positive
n roads to economic development. Minor adjustments to the Contract
' had been approved by the City Attorney. These changes had been
z _t incorporated. Mr. Harrell then reportea that the Chamber had
requested the City announce that the provision in the contract
dealing with the City's review and approval of operational changes
did not include daily operations, but rather minor changes only.
i Mayor Stephens asked about the size of the total committee.
Harrell responded that the City Council would appoint five members.
~ Derrell Bulls, President of the Cnambet of Commerce, reported that
the total number of persons for this committee had not been
detetmined. Th¢re were presently seventeen members of the Chamber "
Economic Development Team. Tne Chamber was excited about this
project and the relationship with the City and the private sector.
Council Member Alexander stated that he had heard speeches by the
V , City Manager, tit. Jetty Cott and others on economic development and
he believed this partnership was very positive.
'X• The following ordinance was presenteds
NO. 66-216
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OP
„ DENTON AND THE DENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PROVIDING FOR A
PROGAAI4 TO PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPM£NTt AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORI AND PROVIDINO AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance and approve
the agreement with the amendment that the intent of the review
proiislon was not tot daily operations but rather for major changes
~iL or procedure*,
Mayor Pro Tom Alford stated that he had been active in the Chamber
of commerce prior to his election to the City Council and he felt
this joint effort was good for Denton.
ti.
On roll coil vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Alford "aye,"
Aiddlesperger "eye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
cartied Unantmouely.
0
i
`
b
L City of Denton City Council Minutes #
Meeting of October 21, 1486
Page 11
0. The Council considered ado Ptiea of an ordinance
establishing fees and charges for the Emily Fowler Public Library.
r City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that this was a routine item.
Joella Orr, Director of the Public Library, reported that this was a
housekeeping item and would allow the City to honor its commitment
to the State library system as well as keeping library tines
consistent.
F The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-117
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE EMILY
FOWLER PUBLIC LIBRARY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On toll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger
k unantmouslyw "aye," and Mayor Stephens lays." Motion carried
" 7. Resolutions
A. The Council considered k)proval of a resolution
" j designating the official newspaper of the City of Denton.
The following resolution was presented:
r4 R E S O L U T 1 0 N
{ WHEREAS, Section 14.03 of the Charter of the City of Denton
provides that the City Council shall annually select and designate
the official newspaper of the City in which all ordinances and
` official notices that are required to be published shall oe
Gy published[ NOSE, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of DINTON, TEXAS:
y SECTION I. r j
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereoy
`f designates and appoints the Denton Record-Chronicle as its official
newspaper. '
" SECTION 11.
That this resolution shall become effective immediately
upon its passage and approval.
rv PASSED AND APPROVED this the 216t day of October, 1PE6.
n
IY T PHENS, MAYOR
CITY 07 DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
~r
r,c- - CRILOIT9 ALLE ;711Y RE AY
A CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS
z c~ .
APPROVED A9 TO LEGAL FORME
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
~ .1
o'V
"
S y s
r
04
t
City of Denton city council minutes 3
Meeting of October 21, 1986 £
Page 18 t
McAdams motion, Chew second that the resolution designating the
Denton Record-Chronicle As the
approved. On roll call vote CfcAdty of Denton official new!Qa er be
, Mams "aye " Alezici "a a Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously,
8. The Council considered authorization to Solicit bids for
the sale or trade of a 0.467 acre tract of public land situated
north of and abutting Windsor Drive a.:d west of Sherman Drive and
more fully described as Lots 10 and 11, Meadoworook subdivision.
D-39
David Ellison, Senior 2lanner, reported that this
' transferred to the City in 1975 to be used as a drainage easement.
Council Member McAdams left the meeting.
Ellison f -ther reported that a request for disposition had been
received, the original bid had been erroneouoly advertised as
Lots 9 and 40. The correct lots Should be 10 and 11.
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to approve the solicitation of
bids. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member McAdams joined the meeting.
9. The Council considered authorizing the Mayor to establish e
task force on drug abuse information and prevention in cooperation
with progeamr offered by the U. S. Conference of Mayors and the
White House.
Mayor Stephens stated that the United States Conference of Mayors
of had dewivnated November 18 as D-Day on Drugs. In order for cities
• to receive Federal grant money for drug abuse programs, a task force
{ moat be established. Approval of this item would autnorl:e she
formation of a,',taek force, The City Council would approve the
members to be appointed. r'-
' Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to authorize the Mayor to
establish the task force on drug abuse information. Notion carried
unanimously,
10, The following miscellaneous matters from the City Manager
l;3 were reported.
i City Manager Lltryd Harrell reminded the Council of the joint meeting
on November 3 at 11130 a.m. at the Ramada Inn with the Denton
Independent School District Board of Trustees,
;f The City column in the Denton Record-Chronicle had begun.
Mr. Harrell asked the council to please follow the quidollnes on th7
4 calendar for topics and dates,
r There was a Strong possibility of a bond election, preclearance
, a would y the Justice Department. The consensus of the
polling place, paper ballots and use the Civic Center as the
11, New Basitnese
The following items of new business were suggested by
Council Members fat future agendasi
ry' Council Member McAdams asked the Planning Depsrtmei,t to take a few
pictures of development sites for Council review with the Idea of
what changes would be required should the twenty percent landsceying
requirement be implemented.
I u,
t
r r i
n i, s ~ a': wh ,(y.:ygwMM++•r ern,..-.-. ..~..aw.avl,k"rMo
r
k
r
r
i
I
City of Denton City Council minutes
meeting of October 21, 1986
i Page 19
3I
Council Member Chew aked that the issue of a atanding Capital
= s Improvements Project Monitoring Committee be placed in the October 28
Council Agenda,
:
' 12. There was
legal matters, ream eta Cel And action on Executive Session items of
personnel/board eppointmente.
11. The Council vas to have held a discuaaion of Ali-Alkafajl
versus the City of Denton and Maverick Aircraft versus the City of
7enton under the Executive Session.
r i1
AS no Executive Session was heldq this itex was
9 1' ` not discussed,
14, Executive Session 1
The Council did not convene into the Executive Session.
Chew motion, Alexander second to adjourn. Motion to adjourn Catried
141. ; unanimously.
,r with no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5110 p,r,
e
t
CITY OP DENTON, 'fE%A9
41 CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
S CITY OP DENTON& TEXAS
+
. 1
,v
J~ ~'rl
gro A-
1
,
1 v r
y / X '1%'t,A 97
0I223 quo
a
N K r
1 ~ 411 r tl» I1 ~
y ~ r
1r`3 1 .t V T^ 'A tl rh 3 '
Atli r 4 ^ ~
~ ry
~ a
Denton Kiwanis Lf-
# Denton, Texas 76201.420 i
81 !
i,
F
CiW'WN'?A~:rKri
MIMI Fh~~
" 1 ReMdro+t
' J. ITALY IMMOt DAR, j0.
~ ~ M+Idanl•dwt
' • ` WMAIAA1 A. V04111,
Imici t hit Pntkw
' MMLAS I CNkDWICA
' Vke-hWd'At
x r t WI11" 1. BONDS
` Tmlunr February 21, 19R7
ROIIRT a. N141 A. JIL
♦d a. axntuy Denton City viduager ~a
Mr. Loyd Harrel
oarclOf 91471117 RY 215 E. McXirney ,Y-
it 1t/dou~Awtte Denton, Texas 76201
4 ' TeIryMN' E117}314!393 :
DEANNUISIY Dear Mr. Harrel,
t Adm 1anh,y
The Kiwanis Children's Clinic is sponsoring its 9th
Etr, MUM" annual garage sale April 4th & 5th. To help gain
-IJ
nwd"acCAtl1'TwRloArr exposure for the event, Kiwanis woull like to request
placement of a banner across Lo=.t street at the
1A0 w•aiAVerr intersection witE Pecan.
i~ t4dd•17 ,
RIC3 OD D. NAYIS
A.r' t9/S•n The banner will be 36 feet in length and will give ;
information on the event. The sale will take place
JA•6K~ 0 April 4th 6 5th at which time we would take it down.
Jtmn1.xINO
k.'r 20°6°8 Due to the lengthy manufacturing time the banner will
jowDi t.IWO need to be ordered as soon as
' 19ee•al possible, if you forsea
YRAi)W.IATTt1110NJn no problem in getting this approved please give us a call j.
tOM at 565-9902 so we can go ahead and order the banner.
DORWW L LWINT. JR.
" 1915.17 Tha you
CttA>5111►.1AIMDW.
19818! :j6hn Adami
y 06UY C, TA%WA
' l9Ad-II ,
x TAD W.TIMI
" ~ 1965.19
yy 7
r 1 y ~1 f
II``r
4~ .
~ xnKNflb'trmv
t,lSw,
~ s
.l
tF
} i
f } , "I
WY 0/ UENTONr rtXAS MUNICIPAL SUILDINO / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 /TELEPHONE (817)508-8307
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
i
75c'. T0: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant Jity Manager
DATE: March 51 1967
SUBJECT: Mike Berry, 4100 Seline
€,A '
Attached are two memos from our inspection people which
indicate the amount of contact we have had with Mr. Berry, In
addition, I have also had several conversations with Mr. Berry
about his concerns and about what he likes and dislikes on the
protect. His complaints to me centered mainly about the top
soil we put in his area and the slope of the riprap.
Mr, Berry was concerned and did not like the slope of the
J, riprap and thought it should be a vertical retaining wall. Our
°j staff chose the riprap because it is much cheaper and the
construction
do more excavating since for the would form n work. to build toe
wells
k , avs His other concerns centered around the fill dirt that was put
in his yard approximately two to three feet from the existing
chain link fence. We did this as A courtesy. I told Mr. Gerry
that we would be happy to re6rove the dirt if he would like us
to do so. We have not received any indications from him that
he would like us to do that.
i Finally, he had some questions about a street patch which was
made on Seline which was actually outside the limits of the
project. Since the pavement was already cracked, in that area,
K,:r• we split the cost of that repair with the contractor since his
equipment aggravated the existing road structure.
We will be happy to report to you on any further questions or
problems that Mr. Berry raises at the meeting.
'117c Assistant City Manager
s
y' 3356M ~
i
PIPW.
l
~ •Kr'
CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denfon, Texas 76201
i
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 2, 1987
1 TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Roger McDaniel, Engineering Technician Supervisor
r SUBJECT: Mike Berry, owner at 4100 Selene
µ On February 10, 19870 Jim Gray and I mot with Mike Berry at
4100 Selene to discuss rip-rap concrete poured in place along
the west .right-of-way of Stuart Road paralleling Mr. Berry's
property.
I explained to Mr. Berry the decision was made to stop the
1
erosion problem for him and the City of Denton as well.
Mr. Berry was not at all pleased of the decision. Ho asked
that we re-evaluate the situation and send him written
c , correspondence of our findings. On February 12, 1987, I mailed
Mr. Berry a certified letter. (See copy attached)
On February lb, 1987, Mr. Berry contacted me in person. He
explained to me that he was not satisfied with our decision and
that he would be contacting the City Attorney's office to file
Rogereie4iing Technician Supervisor
~T 5
'044BE
V~ 1 r
I
N f 1` 1
^l` `a
8 : "^U.VLnf J..w. av .,.uw~r .e. own',... wX,,~l*,y, p,~ -
W
1 .
A
1~ `6
Cf rY o/ DmrON 1216 E• AkKlnney l anion, 7exaa 7020! TAM,.
February 12, 1987
Mike Derry
P.0. Box 394
Denton, Tx 76201
1{
Dear Mike:
Re: 4100 Selene Street - Stuart and Pershing Project
W1 have re-evaluated the construction of concrete rip-ra
fit = p Aced for erosion control in the City of Denton's right-of-way
an,i being along the east side of your
sound engineering practices were usedproperty. keep that
right-of-way and your property from soil erasion In the futureur
We feel all construction is both sound and safe
concerned, for all
• If you have an '
e„ any questions, please call 566-8358.
M Sincerely,
t tit
k ' " Rogbt M •n
Engineering Tech Supervisor
,f
cc: Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney
044SE
k,
rr
t
{ .~~•,w.. ,,,.,,,,..,.a.+.... wsa wwu+,::..-as+. •mw.. ......,,...._wln:xrSdR lttL o-.wu.:rw. a~
i
a
t . r 1
r
sa {
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (417) 566.8200
r'
MEMORANDUM
F
DATE; March 2, 1987
TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
FROMs Jim Gray, Engineering Tech 11
SUBJECT; Mike Berry, owner at 4100 Selene w
! spoke with Mr. Berry approximately 3 to 4 times during the
project. He expressed an interest in the construction and
questioned me regarding the changes affecting his adjacent
property. In our first conversation, 1 explained the
construction process, and told him the cut would be
' approximately 28 inches along his property line. The actual
cut was 32 inches.
± Mr. Berry said that construction had changed during the `
az project, However, the only changes occurring along the
roperty_area was an addition of concrete rip-rap to prevent
future erosion. This area required rip-cap due to the slant of
the slope. The construction of this rip-rap was totally in
accordance to specification. Mr. Berry was upset with the
rip-rap and told me he should have been contacted before the
rip rap was placed. I informed him it was not standard
procedure to discuss work in the public right-of-way.
Mr, berry said the contractor had damaged the road in front of
his driveway. A 2x4 board loft in front of the drive approach
allowed water iskfiltration under the street. Although this
problem existed before the contractor came on the scene, the
contractor and the City shared the cost of fixing the damage.
Mr. Berry mentioned that his fence had been damaged. I
observed all work done near the fence by the contractor and did
r' , not _see any damage at any time. However, oi,e of the '
contractor's superintendents informed me they would straighten
his fence for him and did at the end of the project.
tY
1
S,
04,
1 1
page 2 of 2 pages
I Mri Berry was concerned too about the contractor adding top
sol to some low spots on his property. These low spots were
1 within 3 to 4 feet from the right-of-way line and the
Ij contractor did this at my request. After the top soil had been
added, Mr. Berry visited me at his property. 1 observed water
standing approximately 1 1/2 to 2 111 inches in a previously
existing low spot. 1 also observed 1/4" to 1/2" along parts of
Mr. Berry's fence line. The contractor offered to remove the
top soil, i informed Mr, Berry of this and he never
responded. Mr. Berry later told Roger McDaniel he did not vent
anyone on his property. Since this discussion with Roger, no
one connected or employed by the City has been on his property.
On another occasion, Mr. Berry informed Roger McDaniel that he
sunk 12" in top soil. There is not an area deeper than 3"
l anywhere on his property neither is there an area deeper than
611 along the adjacent right-of-way.
Mr. Berry was also worried about the channel draining on the
north end of Stuart. This channel is cut to grade and
temporarily blocked to complete work on the 54" drainage pipe.
All work done in his area was closely inspected and done
according to specification. It was done appropriately for the }
condition of the area and is structurally sound.
I have discussed the project with Mr. Berry whenever he
r ,
requested and have made every effort to be courteous to him.
Jim Cray'
Engineering Tech 11
' 0446E
I
e
Y e
11 !
, t drat J ' F
i
i
tot
~Nb. t•
J
4a
r
~ tip{
,rati`
t p1 • s d y~`°~~
~ i F \
. f
ss
Fi.
J. a,
WV of DENMNj TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 688.8307
Office of the City Mans2of
Ta . I
3 M E M 0 R A N O U M
TOs Lloyd V. Harrellt City Manager
k
FROMS Jennifer Halters, Acting City Secretary
` DATE: March 5, 1987
SUBJECT: Request for amendment to City Council minutes
4 Mr. Jerry Cott has requested that an amendment be made to the
f bfficial City Council minutes of August 19, 1986.
Upon his request, I provided Mr. Cott with a copy of the
minutes of that meeting as approved by the City Council and a
verbatim copy of the minutes made from the tape recording of
? the meeting in question. As you are aware, minutes of a
meeting are meant to only reflect on the summary action taken
rt' by an official body and are not meant to be a verbatim
transcription of what each member of that body stated during
the course of the meeting.
I believe that if you examine the approved minutes of the
Council meeting of August 19, 1986 with the verbatim
.I ,
" transcription of the meeting, you will find that the previously
approved minutes do accurately reflect the action taken by the
Council) even though they are not a verbatim transcription of
a is that meeting.
1 would be happy to supply you with any further information or
' answer any additional questions that you might haven
JLI
en er a e s
Art Q Cit Secretary
Attachments
2582C
W
4, 1
j
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jennifer Waiters, Acting City Secretary
i
FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Addendum to Council Minutes
DATE: March 4, 1987
On February 12, you requested whether the official minutes of a
City Council meeting which have been approved by the Council
may, at a subsequent date, be amended by adding an addendum.
You advise that the requested "addendum" does not involve action
by the Council but merely some discussion. You also have
inquired as to how such an addendum may be accomplished.
a
t The only Texas case I have been able to find concerning the
amendment of Cit Council action is State Y. Cit of Del Rioa ,
925 S,W.2d 287, Tex. Civ. App.-Eastlan, L930), W111Cn ate z the Council had the authority to enact an ordinance correcting
s
4y clerical error in an earlier adopted ordinance.
Robert's Rules of Order, Revised addresses correction of minutes
and provides "if the existence of an error or material omission
in the minutes becomes established after their approval, the
minutes can be corrected by means of the motion to amend some-
thing previously adopted which requires two-thirds vote.
McQuillan's Municipal Corporations at 514.10 annotates various
decisions concerning the amendment, or correction of minutes.
These cases speak to the validity of amendment to indicate
action taken by the governing body, i.e., an amendment to show
the number of votes for the passage of an ordinance, _Peeo_pl_e_ V.
E Irwin, 1Sb N,E. 292; an amendment to show that the yeas and nays
were taken, Independence 1, H 359 S.W.2d 33= and an amend -
went to show passage o an gape, Robbins v. Herrin, 127
N,E. 353,
. z One reason, I believe, that the cases do not discuss amending
the minutes to reflect part of a discussion is that normally,
P' J. minutes do not contain discussion, but are intended to reflect
' action of the governing body, As Robert's Rules, in 5471
states: Minutes should contain a record of what was done at the
y 3 J N'
7
s
i
3
t
I;
Jennifer Welters
March 4, 1987
Page Two
i
meeting, not what was said by the members. An examination of
our minutes reveals tfiat they contain more than is legally
required. You may trash to take this into consideration when
preparing future minutes.
In conclusion, approved minutes may he corrected or amended if
an error or material omission becomes established. I would
recommend great caution be exercised in so doing, as to amend
minutes to reflect additional discussion as you have indicated,
could set the precedent for
an individual is unsatisified. add Tfie amendmentstmay beaaccomplished
by a motion to amend somothing previously ,kdopted which requires
a two-thirds vote by the Council. Should you have any
additional questions, pleaee advise.
t
rc
~N 7 T -
K t; DAD:js
xc: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
rT
20311
fk.
p f
I'
a4
{f
e: is
r
ri
eY
i
245
s City of Denton City Council Minutes
Auguat 19, 1906
Page Five
B. The Council held a public hearing concerning a
1
petition of Dimension Development Company requesting an
amendment to a planned development (PD-19/PD-62) and approval
of a concept plan for the single family W-10), single family
(SP-7), cluster housing and park areas located east of Lillian
Miller Parkway at the intersection of Teasley Lane (fM 2191).
The 161.7 acres was zoned planned development by ordinance
8I-109 and permits the development of cluster, multi-family,
general retail, single family - 10,000 square feet, single
famiip - 7,ODO square feet , office, park and a community
facility site.
The amendment would change three areass
15.00 acres - froms Cluster housing with a total of
120 units
T03 Single family with a minimum lot
sire of
70000 square feet
30.39 acres - froms Single family with a minimum lot
size of
10,000 square feet
toe Single family with a minimum lot
site of
7,000 square feet
26.53 acres - Proms Cluster housing with a total of
314 units
Tom Cluster housing with a total of
339 unite
* The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Rick Neff spoke in favor of the petition. He asked the
Council to approve the usage changes that they were suggesting
and approval of the concept plan which would give a better idea
of exactly what kind of development was going to take piece,
Council Member Aiddlesperger asked if the developers planned to
pave the other two lanes of Lillian Millar Parkway.
Neff replied no,
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that cart of the problem
was in terms of acct^,a and wondered why the paving of Millar
was not in the plan.
Neff stated that it was not in the plan at this point and did
not kncw if it would be in the future,
Council Member McAdams asked if there was going to be
right-of-way left for the paving.
i Neff replied yes that the right-of-way was already dedicated.
Mr. Jerry Cott spoke in favor of the petition. He stated that
f at the bagin'ng of this developments an 6' stone or brick rail
a` was to be built between his property and the developing
property, Ha wanted to make sure that the wall was in the
r petition and would be built, He also stated that all of the
property In that area was zoned on a first-coma first-serve
basis, 6F-16 toning was the only aching available that would
not go over the City A Development oulde.
Y
e, i ,
r ,f
I
s i
246 4
City of Denton City Council Minutes
August 19i 1956
Page Six
E
I ~ Ms. Claudia Brown spoke in opposition of the petition. She
asked that if the petition was approved it would increase
traffic and that it was very difficult now to get in and out on
! Lillian Millet Parkway.
i j
The mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner stated the the planned development .n
was already approved and in place by ordinance 04-109. This
was an amendment to that ordinance and a request for approval
of a concept plan. She stated that additional right-of-way had
additional two
been provided by the developers to construct the
lanes of Lillian Miller Parkway. She stated that in the
f original ordinance theta was not a condition that a fence be
built between the two properties in question. Technically, the
j problem of, the fence should be addressed during the detailed
i planning stage and not at this point in time. Overall change
does not change the intensity or density in the area. Planning
and zoning approved the petition by a vote of S-1. Nine reply
forms were mailed with one returned in favor.
~ Mayor Stephens eked that the density wouls not be changed.
t
~ Carson replied that certain areas would increase but the
~il elimination of the cluster housing and the reduction to single
j ; family (SE-7) caused a significant reduction in that area.
Mayor Stephens asked how the development would s2fect the
r property to the south,
Carson replied that it would provide additional flexibility to
developers in the future. The surrounding coning would be
looked at when considering a new proposal in that area.
Mayor Stephens asked about the property to the north.
Carson replied that the property to the north was single family
with 10,000' lots, The density was not significantly altered
f with the change.
Mayor Stephens asked No. Carson to address the question raised
+ by Ms. Brown concerning the traffic problems,
' Carson stated that the intensity was not going to bo changed so
the traffic generation would stay the same,
Lloyd Martell, City Managerp added that Lillian Miller was a
x part of the Capital improvement program that was filed with the
Council by the Planning and Zoning Commission. It called for
funding to complete Lillian Miller to a four lane section.
rCouncil Member Alford asked that in regard to the buffer wall,
I was it Included in the amendment,
Council Member McAadmiw stated that it was not included in the
1 amendment.
Debra Drayovitchi City Attorney, stated that the appropriate
time to insect the requirement for the screanine would be in
the detailed site plan approval stage,
r
Council Member Alford asked how, they could be assured that it
would be there,
f
i; ` fly, anF:
i 247
City of Denton City council minutes
August 190 1986 i
i page seven
i
Carson explained that the amendment did not affect the entire one parthotntheuproiectE There Could:beimotefproDl ms yif the ewall
were to be required before the detailed site plan was worked
out than to wait until the entire plan was developed. The
letters and statements from Mr. Cott and the noted conditions
in t minutes of Planin
cityhcouncil minuteshwouldnassure thatothe9walltwo ldabe noted.
j 1. The Council considered Adoption of an ordinance
approving an amendment to a planned development (PD-19/PD-82)
family (SF-10),
and eapproval
housiag t and single park areas.
(SF-7), cluster plan for
family of a
8ingi
The following ordinance was presented.
NO. 86-164
i
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A
REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPKENT
DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 84-1090 AS SAID
I PLAN APPLIES TO 161.1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED EAST OF
LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH
1 TEASLEY LANE, AS IS KOBE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREINt AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
• c
( 4C Adams mo,to_n.. Alford second to adopt the ordinance as
p e-a Cana cc a ae a note 1- nee m nu es t~ia[oun~il
{ i II'ed4 Ito
des rem that_at SFie_C me..o _t e..rev a ._6C-this
enJ a aol afence along the- southern..boutidary_.De-incorpor3t~d.
pi
t fG~9 tdeher diEailed site plan. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye,"
Alexan' Alford "aye," Riddleaper9er
" ne "aye,
B
aye;"
s "ays," Chew "aye," and mayor Stephens "aye.' Motion carried
y e unanimously.
f C. The Council held a public hearing on a petition
of Jack Price, representing First Texas Medical, Inc.,
r requesting approval of a detailed plan and preliminary plat on
40849 acres of a planned development (PD-1). The property is
r. located at 2026 West University and shown in khe Robert
Beaumont Survey, No. ll. It approved, the development of a
psychiatric hospital would be permitted with standards as shown
on the detailed plan.
' The heyor opened the public hearing.
' Mr, Bob Gladney, Psychological Institutes of America, spoke in
favor of the petition. He stated that the development of the
hospital was a joint venture between first Texas Medical and
r Psychological Institutes of America, it would be run and
r' managed by Psychological Institutes of America, He stated that
E- there was a need tot this service in this area and would'
tovide benefits to the community in the form of approximately
p
1S0 fobs in the area.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public heating.
Cecile Carson, Urban Plannet, stated that the site plan had
been approved by the council, it was a former osteopathic
conditions bid been intensity/dansity, site plan the
former hospital
r submitted to the planning and toning Commission and the Council
r for approval, The plan conforms to all city ordinances, won •
Y a reply forms W N mailed with 1 returned in favor and 1 returned
in opposition. The Planning and toning Commission approved the d-f
plan unanimously.
N
P
4,Y
1
r,
P
248
City of Denton City Council Minutes
s Augur' 19, 1986
Pago i It
1. The Council considered an ordinance adoption of
an ordinance approving A detailed plan and preliminary plat on
4.049 acres of a planned development (PD-1).
l The following ordinance was presented:
f NO. 86-IGS w
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A
DETAILED PLAN FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOP14ENT DISTRICT
APPROVED ACRES Or LAND LOCATED AT 0A 26 SAID L
TO t 8 UNIVERSITY
DRIVE, AS IS MORE PART!=LARLY DESCRIBED HEREINr
PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OP 1,000.00 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOFI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
'r call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," H^Qkins "aye,"
3 Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "ale," Chew "aye,'' and mayor
Stephens "aye." motion carried unanimously.
0. The Council held a public hearing to consider a
petition of Whisenent Properties requesting a change in coning
from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned
development (PD) district and approval of a concept plan on a
60.2 acre tract located on the south aide of East McXinney
i Street (FM 426) approximately 650 feet west of Loop 288. The
property is further described in the M. Yoachum Survey,
Abstract 1442, and the Mary L. Austin Survey, Abstract A. If
and uses= the planned development will permit the following
, r S
ki r.+. parcel A - Garden Office - 5,77 acres
parcel B - Two family (Duplex) - 14.21 acres
- 130 total unite with a density of 9.15 Inits per
acre
Parcel C - Single Family Attached - 40.02 acres
478 total unite with a density of 11.95 units per
acre
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
4 + S
i • ':1
Mr. Jim McElhaney spoke in favor of the petition. He stated
r.". ` that the developers had been before the Planning and Zoning
Commission three times and had been denied three times. He
nci
Cou
x the
det statedtthatoin May the developers presort dtto the Plinnilq and
Zoning Commission a concept with lover density and that concept
r was denied. Staff rscommsnded lowering the dwelling units and i
i eliminating the general retail, He stated that there woo a
• 5. need for this concept plan in Denton, They mere not asking for
toning, they were asking for approval of their concept plan.
cwnedeLthisnproperty stated and
d" that G he ndand Mulkey family had f. vor of the
still owned property next to the Proposed development. He
stated three reasons for approval of the developmentt the
intensity, me tlt4 property WouldObetot* U444bkeethan _ itmisenow#
and he personally felt that it would benefit Denton in the area
?i of increased taxes and lobs,
1 No one spoke in opposition.
.I .
L The Mayor closed the public hearing.
I
r
K
1-:
i
{
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FROM TAPE DATED 06/19/96
P
Mayor Stephens: The next item is 3B.
2-1616-petition of Dimension Development Company requesting an
amendment to a planned development PD-19 and PD-62 and approval
of a concept plan for the single family (SF-101, single family
ISF-71 cluster housing and park areas located east of Lillian
Miller Parkway at the intersection of Teasley Lane, FM 2161.
The 161.7 acres was toned planned development by Ordinance
64109 and permits the development of cluster, multi-family,
general retail, single family 10,000 square feet, single family
" 7,000 square feet, office, park and a community facility site.
The amendment would change areas as mentioned in the backup
material. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval. Is there snyone in the audience who would like to
speak in favor of Z-1616. Please come forward and like the
others state your name and your anchor and proceed.
Rick Naffs Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, my name La 1
Rick Neff, I'm with Dimension Development Company. We bring
1 " this before you this evening asking approval of this change in
the uses on our property. The property was coned PD in 1964.
` We are coming before you to change some of the uses. We are
also asking approval of a concept plan which was not required
in 1961 which gives you a much better idea of what exactly it
Is we plan to do. I would be happy to answer any questions.
Mayor Stephens: Okay, what did you say your name was please
q sir?
Rick Neff: My name is Rios Neff, N-E-F-F.
h Mayor Stephens: As in Pat, Governor Pat Neff?
Rick Neff: Yes sir.
Mayor Stephenas Okay. You related?
Rick Neffi Yes sir.
Mayor Stephanes Are you? All rights that Was a long time ego,
that won't help you or hurt you.
c,". Rick Neff: I'm glad to hear that.
q i Mayor Stephenas Okay. Anyone elee like to ask Mr. Rick Neff
any questions?
Council Member Riddlesperger: I noticed that it's on Lillian
d Miller.
Rick Naffs Yea sit.
Council Member Riddlosperger: Are you going to rwe the other
two lariat of that street? I didn't see this in your material
~ I dust w6nderld7
u
Rick Neff: There must have bean a reason for that air. No
sir, we don't have that in nut plans at this moment.
Council Member Riddlesperger: It seems to its that there is a
' part; apart pare of the pro5lea your going ,6 have there and in
a ; terms o[ access and I just wondered why that wasn't in that
plant
w
~ a
T'
ylP of
!1111. City Council Minutes
i From Tape Dated 06/19/86
Page 2
Rick Neff: That's a good question sit. I'm not sure I have a
teal good answer for that, except that's not in our plans at
this point.
Council Member McAdamsi Is there going to be right-of-way for
that left.
Rick Neffl we've dedicated the right-of-way already.
1
Council Member McAdamsi Okay.
Mayor Stephens: Okay, other questions Mr. Neff? Thank you sic.
Rick Neff: Thank you.
Mayor Stephansi to there anyone also in the audience who would
Y like to speak in favor of this petition?
Jerry Cotti Mayor Stephens and City Council Members, I'm Jerry
1 C[, Sundown Ranch, just to the south of this. Basically we
ao[re !n favor of this with two comments. Comment number one is
that in the original agreement whets you see a black line on
the mouth of Dimension Development's Property, Me. Wachter,
many years ago when he started and many times since has agreed
to put a permanent brick or stone eight-foot wall between that
property and my property and I just wanted to make sure that
that was in the petition. Ntimber two. Please don't accept
this as a lecture, but all of '.hose properties ere now gonad on
a first-come, Bret-served Caeis and I know that this City
Council and the zoning and the people of this community are
wrestling with that issue. There is no zoning, I am zoned
agricultural, that I could have at this point in time except
SF-16, which would not co over the city Guide according to the
r Planning Guide, and I strongly urge that you take the issue of
first-come, first-served up and seriously eliminate that as
part of this community's operating procedure, Thank you.
att. Mayo: Stepbensi Okay, any questions to Mr, Cott? Thank you
sir. Is there anyone else who like to speak in favor of
2-1616? Anyone else who would like to speak in favor of this
petition? Anyune Alas in favor? Hearing none, let me ask if
a there is anyone in the audience who like to speak in opposition
i ' to 1-1816?
Claudia Browns My namo is Claudia Brown and I live at 315
t i AidgeCrest in Southridge and I just want to know it this is
f approved, what is he going to do, or what is the City going to
do so that these people can get in and out, because we can't
s3 get in and out, and that's my only opposition to it.
Council Member Aiddlespsrgerr You're askihq the same question
I asked, who's going to pave the other two lanes of Ridgeway?
"t Claudia Browny Well, I've only there four years and to my
knowledge, I can either get out by Teasley Land of I can get
t out by Lillian Miller, which is you know, fairly new, or you
" can leave by the access road, Well you can't leave by the
aceams toed because the traffic backs up off the interstate and
so you can't get back, You can't get oy to 90 back to town
E which is where I work. And it you go out Lillian Miller, than
in the morning I have to wait three or lour traffic lights to
a$' o that way, And I can't even get out anymore on Teasley, so I
~uet, how am I going to get to work?
i
r
in >
J 9^
,
I
City Council Minutes
9 From Tape Dated 08/19/85
I` Page 3
i Mayor Stephens: Okays I see what you mean Ms. Brown. Any 7
questions of Ms. BrOWn7 Okay, thank you. Staff will address,
1 presume when the time comes, the trrffic situation. Okay, is
there anyone *lee who would like to speak in opposition to
Z-1A1A? Anyone in Opposition? Anyone in opposition? Let me '
declare this, well Wait a minute we have a rebuttal. Would the
petitioner like to address the particular question raised and
limit yourself only to the question raised? Okay, thank you.
We declare the pub7io hearing to be closed and call upon the }1
city Manager to W act his staff presentation.
' City Manager Harrell: Yes, let me at least start by asking the
Planning Staff to make the primary presentation please.
Cecile Carson, Urban planner: Mr. Mayor and Memhers of the
Council, as already has been mentioned this is a planned
development that is approved and in place under Ordinance
81109. This is an amendment to that proposal and a request for
approval of a concept plan on the residential areas. The three
areas of concern are basically, 1 would like to point out to
r you for clarification is, a change from 15 acres of cluster
housing that would have abutted Mr, Cott's property on the
mouths to a single family SP-7 districtj a 30.39 acre single
family area on the north boundary line that was SP-10 that
would be Changed to single family on 7,000 squsre foot lots
alsor and an addition to the until in the 28.53 acre cluster
housing area that abuts the light industrial planned
development on the eastern boundary line. This property does
abut Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley at the intersection in
h the original planned development when it was approved
right-of-way, to answer one of the questions, was provided by
theme developers and paving was done of those two lanes.
Additional right-of-way has been provided by the developers to
~hh construct the additional two lanes for Lillian Miller's
r, expansion and it's my understanding that the money situation
for that will be involved through the bonding process or the
band approval to actually do the paving of those additional
lanes on Lillian Miller north of 35. To clarify the Issue
brought up by Mr. Cott concerning the fence, In the original
ordinance, there was not a condition imposed to build or
e construct that fence. in diuussions with the Legal
Department, since this is an amendments it was stated that that
item is something that should be addressed technically during
the detailed plan stags when these developers would be required
to bring back their specific details and screening for the
project and it is not an item that shovid be addressed ■t this
w point. However, we did mention to Mr. Cott that it would be
for his but benefit to have it on the record of the Planning
and Zoning Commission and the City Council that he is still
concerned and still interested at that detailed plan stage to
have the fence constructed. The overall' amendment does not
significantly change the intensity or the density in this
a area, It Iemaln@ at the consistent amount of approximately six
percent over the standard. The proposal does seen to add a
11 number of benefits including diversity in the area and the
Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend approval by a vote
of 5-1. Theta were nine reply forms mailed to property owners
within 300 feet and one was returned in favor. And if you have
any questions , wi<< 6w y..ased to respond,
Mayor Stephenst Any questions of the Council to Ms. Carson.
Ms. Cason would elaborate just a little bit mote. You said
that it would not change the density all that much. To change
+ from SP-10 to Sr-7 and to increase the number of cluster
.
,
4
S,
H /
pA
. ~ y
4 ~
i. t
Y
City council minutes tl
From Tape Dated 08/19/86
Page /
Q
' housing, whatever cluster housing is, and that comma under
different definitions i think, looks like that would increase
the density a bit,
Carsons In certain areas it will change the density as an
increase, but by eliminating the cluster housing which had a
density of approximately 124 units and reducing it to single
family T7, which ie approximately 4.7 units per acre, you
have a significant reduction in that one area. The single
family 10 and single family 7 is about a .7 difference between
h+ the density that his been proposed oy the developers, so
i there's not s whole unit difference on the percentages and in
the cluster area, they are increasing it by approximately 25
untts. But there's still an overall decrease in their total
units for the project and that really has a great deal to do
with the fact that their figures or their density figures for
the SF-7 is slightly lower than what we use as a s:zncard in
most straight zoning requests for single family with 7,070 foot
lots.
f ` Mayor Stephens: Now will that effect the property to the mouth
then, in the transition from agricultural to this development.
caraont What has been recommended in the Development Guide
q` basically is when one of these intensity areas is over the
standard that we look at it fro m an entire planning area and
what the surrounding land uses ace. This will provide some
f additional flexibility for Mr. Cott or whoever may at some
point zone the property to the south. That we would look at
what the surrounding zoning is in order to consider a proposal
for his property though it is over the standard. It would be
more of a land planning issue than an intensity issue at that
point, since the intensity has been used.
r
~h.
l Mayor 6tephenst Then on the other side, has the transition to
the north side been changed. The Village, or what ever that
was.
Carson: The property to the north that abuts the single
family, or that abuts this family is single family with 100000
square foot lots.
t 1 Mayor Stephens: On that the Village? The Vail on it?
Carsonr That property abuts Teasley and comes beck towards
this corner, and you might point it out, the property is split
on the northern boundary so that there itf a double to nsition,
the sevens going to the tens does not significantly alter it.
b} ' -
Mayor Stephens: Then one last thing. Would you address
J Mrs, Brown a inquiry concerning traffic. As I understand it,
the intensity, as you explained it, the intensity is not
changed not much.
Carson: As far as our traffic geherationt correct,
M Mayor Stephens: Bo that was I believe was the extent of her
N „ question which means this toning will not adversely affect it
r „H
t anypIoto then its already been affected, then what is already
: Carsont Right, the toning that is in place today would to the
i „ same traffic generator at the amendment that's being proposed, t
w= r ~
,
~ f
~y 1 1
5
FF ~
1
city Council Minutes
From Tape Dated 08/19/86
Page 5
Mayor Stephenu I see.
Carsont So they will not generate any more traffic and then
the road itself would be as pact of that bond proposal to
actually do the other lanes for construction which would
improve the area but the intensity would not change because of
this amendment.
Mayor Stephens: Mr. Riddlesperger's question, do you want to
address that in a moment?
Mayor Stephenas Well let me see, any more questions for
Ms. Carson though. -
Carson: Mr. Ellison was just pointing out as something that
the citizens of the area might be interested in is that there
is a proposed collector that s shown through this property that
connects Lillian Miller. At this point it would dead and in
that cluster area. The developers in this request have been
working with the State School and with the adjoining property
G owners to extend that collector street to State School Road
which wculd ultimately be Loop 188. That would add an
additional access out of that Soulhridge, southeast Denton area
to the south and to the east which would provide some
additional assistance in traffic.
" Mayor Stephense Across state property?
~11°4M L Carsont The property that is presently owned by the State
School. What* the park, Brier Cliff Park is presently located
and is a lease agreement with the City for the park to be
located there. The collector street alignment at this point
+ would go through :hat property and connect into State School
i Road,
R tY
' Mayor Stephensi Who would pay for the road across state
Properly?
ugh that thethe developers would ir actual developmintay the majority
y rnbelieve
of it that
y i 'r
Mayor Stephense Yeah, I know, but, on State School Road, who
would pay for that? The de wlopec?
} r,' 1 Carsont I believe that it would be, you know, something that
would have to be worked auto where the developers and probably
the City would have participation of some kind of agreement to
build that rood. The specifics have not determined that I know
Mayor Stephens$ okay, thank you. At. City Manager,
i Lloyd Matrelli Yes, Mr. Mayoro 1, jest wanted to elaborate just
a bid on Council Riddlespergers question regarding Lillian
Killer and clarity to the Council, that as part of the capital
improvement Program that has boon filed with the Council by the
4. Planning and toning Commission. It does call for funding to
a 4 tomppat. U to thet section to a four-lane section on Lillian
It K11l And as Council is aware that now will be fuoncied back
k to the Citizen Capital Improvement committee that the council
his recently proposed and that will be back to you probably
d.' within the next couple of months for final decision, and then
possibly a bond issue,
. I
< t
It I
Y
,
a
l
r
1
City Council Minutes
From Tape Dated 08/19/86
Page 6
Council Member Aiddlespergerr
How tar is it from we can get some votes that way.
this proposed street over to State School
Road? How far is it across there?
Mayor Stephens: How far 1$ it to Cross the way:
Caraanr About a mile.
Mr. Neffr first of a11, we also ere owners of the adjoining
tract. There ■re two thoroughfares or collectors planned. One
would go directly across this, we are showing right now, to
35. The other would wind around the lake and qo down to the
southeast portion of the adjoining property, across this
northern tab of the reen property. 2 have been workingh with thheD St to State Mental Health and Mental Retrrdatloo now for many months.
They
are in agreement with us that we need a collector across theca
and they agree to give us accass, or righcol e
Mayor Stephensr And you would pay for the whole thing,
y+ Mr. Neffr Sir, es Cecile 41+'s kind enough to point out, the
F details on that haven't been worked out. But it is certainly
an essential pact of our development in this whole area of
1 development as far as access to the entire area.
Mayor Stephensr Does any member of the Council have anything
further to add?
a ra
a inurncil
wall was
thacariou as t MreCotttwassreferring.toayor,
Mayor Stephensr Eight foot,
Council Member Alford: is this included in Lt, at did the City
K
Attorney have some comment on that, Did 1 misunderstand that?
"
` Mayor Stephehsr 2 believe the gusstion, was, is the planning
Staff have that written into the agreement.
.oar y
' Council Member McAdams: And they said no, that it was not,
niyor Stephensr You know, f did not catch that, Okay,
Council Member Altordr Oka
f 'Yr that is what t thought 2 heard,
Mayor Stephensr Ms, Debts Drsyovitch, City. Attorney
Debra Drayovitchr from the notes indicated at the Minutes of
the Planning CommlSsion and Ms. Carson's communicattons with
Kr, Morris who is our toning representative, t believe it is
' indicated that the appropriate time to loser! that requirements
1 for the Screening wall is at the detailed site plan approval
stage.
Council Member Alford: But how do we aeaure that it's that*
than,
Mayor Stcphensr By putting it in now: really,
Council Member Mct,damst But, we've got it, unless we are going
to amend out ordinance, see we have got an ordinance, it does
not include it, an amendment,
.1
~'~v"
3
City council Minutes
from Tape Dated 08/19/86 1
Page 7 q
' Careons If I might address this more specifically, the main
reason for this is because the amendment does not affect the
entire southern boundary of tnat project. It only affects one
small property, which, since it is an amendment we would
technically only have control over requesting that that masonry
wall be located along, that one section of sr-J. Which could
potentially create more of a problem then waiting until the
detail plan when it could be placed all the way across the
southern boundary. And what has been done, is there are
letters and statements from Mr. Cott and it is in the minutes
f of the Planning and toning Commission and now in the Minutes of
the City Council, that this is an item that should be
addressed. So that it will be on file and in the planning
staff's records so that when the detailed plan is submitted,
that item can be inserted as a condition to that detailed plan.
Mayor Stephens: well, why couldn't it be inserted now so you
can remove that uncertainty and have it as a matter of record?
j Carson: It is my understanding that Me. Morris had a problem
with it becauue it was only an amendment to a portion of the
planned development and you could only require the fence along
that portion of the planned development that was being
amended. So it might actually divide the neighborhood and have
t part of it with a fence and ppate of it not depending on how
,v their detail Plan was submitted,
Lloyd Harrell? Mr. Mayor, if I may. My understanding is that
all the parties are in agreement. That fence, if I understand
fi correctly, from the developer, everyone is in agreement that
that will be provided during the development process, and what
we're talking about is just the technique for insuring that it
p is accomplished. And I think that is why the staff suggested
r that we put that request in the Minutes and what I would
suggest is just a statement similar to the one that I made.
That everyone is in agreement that that fence will-, be provided
at the appropriate time when the final development plan is
produced, so that everybody and•tstands that, I think from a
legal standpoint it's best to do it later although the
intensions should be expressed at this point.
i`• oebra Drayovitchi I think if you go ahead and have a portion,
I mean you could go ahead and include that %a a condition of
" the t•dinance before you, and I'm not site of the affect it
would tive, later on, but I think you still have the
until will thave
Prl the opportunity come wiback at thhold a development ct ain time pproval and
hat
condition is met.
1 Council Member McAdamei Is the motion in order?
Mayor Stephens? Yes the motion is in order.
Council Member McAdamss Then I want."" move to royal of
1-1818 the ordinance to p~rov~ided i~e~ ~-ket. And
n nu~FFi-EA+t Counoll dsslrer.,at the t me
a'3d as a note
i the
v o _che_ e a o !__eY±a~ lang
' nore g • e _lWkt,ti the. s uthern wi it
soulTi•[n, mean -io`t irn ou [YIhAtt the • n7
iy; tjill _joA[1SifE_5514 t' y E cpntas n t at a s a Tif•
plan.
Council Member Alford: Second that,
C
r
ar
a
t:
I
City Council minutes ?
( Prom Tape Dated 00/19/66
page a
Mayor Stephenst Okays motion _second to approve the ordinance
1 ddedeat the hatpcopriateitime tAny tfurthertdiscussion~nMadam
s secretary.
on roll call vote, McAdams "Aya," AlexCh,Vr"aye Hopkins
k *eyes* A1[ori "ayeRiddleeperger *aye," and mayor
Stephens "aylt." Motion carried unanimouslY•
I Mayor stephenst All voted Aye.
r.. t
G
i
.
i
}
a~
iq
15171
a ,
i ~
7
a 2
°
r
44
I
1 y
i
DAM 033//10/87
f' CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORKAT
f TOt Kayor and Kembere of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Kanage.
SUBJECT: HOLDING PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE REQUEST OF TEASLEY ROAD
ASSOZIATES FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIKATELY 80.82 ACRES BEING PART
OF THE JAMS COLTART SURVEY, ABSTRACT 288, AND LOCATED NORTHWEST OF
LOOP 288, NORTH OF KINGS ROY, AND WEST OF FARRIS ROAD (A-42)
RBCOt41HNDATION t
a J. The Planning and Zoning Commission will make its recommendation at
its meeting of Karch 110 1487. The Development Review Committee has
reviewed the technical aspects of the proposed annexation and
r ;`f potential development and has no objections.
~ ~ S11I9iARYt
The petitioners of this voluntary annexation proposal informed the
City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, and staff of their
M , intention to request annexation and zoning of additional property
when public hearings and review of zoning for an adjoining 115 acres
was being processed (A-33). There are no existing land uses or i
' dwelling units located on the subject property is zero. The stated purpose ofthe annezationirequest
is to provide for a forthcoming tingle family (SF-7) zoning petition.
9A~ rrf
t The adjoining and previously annexed property (A-33) has been sow
planned development (PD) with a predominant land use of single
family detached (b acres of retail at intersection of Loop and Kings
Row), An elementary School on Varris Road is under construction and
scheduled tar Fall 1487 opening.
P8498AK8. DIP KTS OR GROUPS AFFICTI¢D!
City of Denton, property owners.
FISCAL iMPACTt
' Undsrtet,ained
a _ s
,r
k •d
n ^i
d
t ~ 4~r.~" r fi~ 1
1
I A-~12
i March 101 1487
Page 2
r Respect y submitted:
Prepared byt City IOL"er
_ David 611ison
1 senior Planner
b ,
.'~j Jett Ne
Director of Planning
and Developmnt
1 p li
F ~
r~ r t 11
i yyjj,$$,Fyy ij
qq3;
kr
i:
yy.{ u.~~ 2b69r
F '
wry:" ' Irl ~ I
y
r
,
WY ~ I
z
1685L
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
b.
NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT:
The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
proceedings to alter tho boundary limits of said City to add the
y territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incor-
porated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City
of Denton.
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the 10th day of March ,
1987, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. In the C tI y Touncil CS-am-5-ors o the
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
' interested in the abovo proposed annexation. At said time and
' place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
II heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested
1 in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
I A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council
ei of the City of Denton, Texas, on the 17th day of March ,
N ! 19870 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City-Touncil Chambers o t e
Mat,icipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
placa all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
beard. Of all said matters and thirl,s, all persons interested
,r 1 in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
e ri v `L 1;
RAY r 0
r CITY 0 DENTON, TEXAS
i e
ATTEST:
r
r
F ALTERS
ACT MY SECRETARY
.
`.y. A-42/TEASLEY ROAD ASSOCIATES
JJ:1wM. +ri1.aY.®. alai W - a.....'Al
~Y
r:
I~
I'
PIRLD NOM TO A. Yt
October 26, 1986
PALO NOTl4 TO A-4
All that Certain treat or parcel of lead 2 i
County of Denton, state of Texas ' being ng to bt situated in the
Abstract 244 and Poore ful as oll art of the Jars
1y described ovi:
Colttrt Surrey,
alOINNINO at a point in the present city
tatsrssatios Of the Northeast bounds line lin said point lying at the
ON1laaaoe N4. 42-6 with the Southerly at t the treat described in
in Ordinear,e Mo. 66-66, said point lsoolyiiet corner of the tract described
"rpendtoular to the Center line of statskng 600.0 toot Noetheaet at end
! tghW Loop 266; a,
~ THINCR North SO. 16' 19" weft
{ prsseot oath Baits ss estet, (Byy ordinance worth 470 20' 1691 West) along the
of sad
parallel it the by Ordinance M • 62-61 600.0 toot Northeast
r sole oe less the tastsy West
llntib at said Loop 266, passing at 312.39 lest, j
J. D. arow, at al., to You le ouodeny line Of a treat Of lead conveyed
f June to 1966 sad recorded is Volum
Road e 1696sspated PL" tract by deed lotfrom
betas the W t la 4co ve the . O.T. , ear o
boundary line of a tract of lead conveyed fmroeg J D a
we., to William, 0. sores sad wife, Diane K. barges b
1963 tad recorded in volume 1237, Pap 326 of the D.R.D~,Wep July 19; at
11377.6 lNt, more or 1w, the North boun" pasted
as ssingat
E being the Northarly south boundary line oaidlTsssl T said sorties tract, ter
Five
treat, art continuing a total diataAeo of 11901.50 fee! toethe beginning o[ a
- curve to the tell with a radius at 6,329.54 feet, a central angle of 9. 13'
10«, a chord bear!
n6 and distance of )forth 540 $4' 53" West, 10017.39 fast,
THRNCR Northwesterly, along said cur" to the left and
limits, 600,0 fast Northeast Of the neater Una of LOO •L4 present city t
of 11016649 fast to a point for center, said
ro ft 266, an are Northeeast
at and perpendicular to said center line of Proposed Loop op 62000 said point also
v `I Iylag in the North boundary line of said Teasley (toad Associated Pivs traati
TNCNCC North 69•' 16' 42" last along the h Road Associated Pi" treats a distanoee ato3plolodldfeet to a point for corner,
,S said point bat ='1~ line at said Teasley
traatl the Northeast corner of said Teasley Road Associated Five a
TkINCI South 010 «
320 12 last along the Rut boundary line of said Teasley
Rood Associated Five treat, a distance at 644.39 toot to an
earners said point being a Northwest corner of t`u present oily liatits u
011ablishod Dy Ordi angle point for
,b
aanCe No. 46-64,
TkINCt South 000 11' 19" last
said present oily 1latts rase , fly Ordiaanas South 00. 17' 2491 cast) &Ioi ' Road p esent city
Pi" tract being the last boundary line of sold Tauloyg
, a distance at 16134Y42 !at to a point !en
said point being the southeast Garner of said Tessloy Road Assoctatfo r Gaivoynor, 04 r. A-42/EXHIBIT A
M
4°
lIeld Motes A-4t
October 280 1986
Page 2
r tract, ssm being an inner ell corner of the present city limits as
established by Ordinance No. 86-880 said point also lying in the South
V boundary lifts of said James COltart Survey,
Daniel D. Culp Survey, Abstract 287; the Worth boundary ling of the
TMBafCg 894 03' ON Yost, (by Ordinance south 89. 09' 09" West), along said
present city liaits same being the south
bounda line of live tract, cad said survey lines, dtstaawe of 829,71 testStothe
place of beitaniai and containing $0.82 acres of land,
Cr -
A
y,,t r
A
y r _i
r ~
t +i
1
I 7
Y`Y 1
j 193!6 e
3y' °l
A-42/EXHIBIT A
9t'
A,
z,
q
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS `
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS t
s • he City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
` area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1, Pursuant to the.
provisions of Article 970a as
a amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A, Police
12
dr (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
`t. (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
went of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C, water
(~1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
a will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
r
D, Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas,
E, Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will,be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
'K!S ~
r,
w, j
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
u. (2) Routine maintenance, on the same basis as in the
F+, present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
' (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such mayor improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
{ body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
61;
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
Y (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
z„ H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
t ' date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
' t
J, Recreation
il+
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation, The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K, Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
rr electric power.
'rCd ~ r
I
F •
{
to i
;
x
;k
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
11. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The plan is prioritized by such policy gvti+e- ,
"ry lines as:
pa (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
J!' of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
~r
i" The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
i; upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation, In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be fudged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city. >
r
k
NI
{L
{
J
Y
r I
I
ao~iexoony Ls~inntoenl {!.Fii;i;j, ~ e Z
1 r
S, r
u~ nY
y
1
1
:1 1
s
v' ~ ~ 00~• NO~OS ~ ~dl
gain
~a 9y 1
N. paM w !4u ;
• sad ~ .mac.: I
44
r
Ir, :
j , ~~ll 1
:I
1 ,
k1
1
1 ~ ` 1 I
t frl W Q j~0e • 1 \
R x~ ;P un4~ saD • w~
y
A-42
{ ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
✓ January 26, 1987 Submit City Council agenda item
h'
✓ January 28, 1987 Submit City Council agenda back-up
3 y I ~ 9_ February 3, 1987 City Council sets date, time and place
for public hearing
k yf February 25, 1987 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle for
r first public hearing
J March 11, 1987 Planning and Zoning Commission makes
recommendation
ky,' i / February 27, 1987 Publish notice and mailout for first
public hearing
v}
f ✓ March 2, 1987 Submit City Council agenda item
t v March 4, 1987 Submit City Council ag o+nda back-up
March 4, 1987 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle for
r V ✓ second public hearing
k„ March 60 1987 Publish notice and mailout for second
fKa`.. public hearing
March 9, 1987 Submit City Council agenda item
;M * March 10, 1987 City Council holds first public hearing
f ° at special called meeting
March 11, 1987 Submit Ctty Council agenda back-up
March 17, 1987 City Council holds second public
hearing at regular meeting
° March''301 1987 Submit City Council agenda item
April 1, 1987 Submit City Council agenda backup
A
pril 91 1987 City Council institutes annexation
' proceedings at special called afternoon
meeting
April 9, 1987 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle
April 12, 1987 Publish ordinance
May 11, 1987 Submit City Council agenda item
P~
May 13, 1987 Submit City Council agenda backup
may 19, 1987 Final action by City Council at regular
T~
meeting
Denotes action by the City Council
04640
~ ..nNWI 21 Yq .
0 i
IV ,
e
t
_.G
f
o
DATE: 03/10/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
y TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council
-n. FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR NJAMING OF PAGE/POCKRUS ROAD
RSQ MMBNDATIO
f
{ At its meeting of January 28, 19878 the Planning and Zoning
Cosmiaston voted to recommend that Page Road be approved as the
r correct name of Paige/Pockrue Read.
BUMMAR Y:
j
i
This is a request from property owners in the area to determine the
correct now of Paige/Pockrue Road from its intersection with
Interstate Highway 358 to its intersection with Swisher Road.
Mr 9ACIGROUND:
This road was named Pookrus Road in 1976 by an act of the
Cosmissionere Court. When the road was annexed into the city in
1985, street signs were posted identifying the street as Pookrus
$c Road. Property owners along the road protseted this action and
eat requested that the City determine the correct name for the road,
PROGRAMS. DBPARTHIM OR GROUPS AFRCTBD:
Property owners along Page/Pockrue Road
FISCAL IMPACt:
r.
Not applicable
Respeott submitted:
Lloyd, r 1
Prepared by: City meager
Denise Sp ve
Urban Planner
.'i
ApD ed
i
1 Director o! Planning
and Devilopment
F 04390
k
App.a dp..n ,..n... .r . _ t
k
i
y ,
4
ID
1; 7" CITY of DffNTON, T<XAd MUNICIPAL BUILDINQ / 215 E. MCKINNEY ST. / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
~s
MEMORANDUM
ti DATEi March 4, 1987
TOt Denton City Council
i PROMI Denise Spivey, Urban Planner `
SUBJBCTt Paige/Pockrus Road
In 1965, Paige/Pockrus Road was annexed into the City of Denton. After
consulting the Denton County Map, the Traffic Engineering Division posted
signs identitylnr the street ae Pockrus Road. This action generated a storm
of protest from residents of the area who believe that Paige Road is the
3°• correct new for the street. In researching the matter, staff determined that
the street was officially named in 1976. At that time, the Denton County
Commissioners Court asked the Denton County Historical Survey Committee to
rr'y'~ suggest name for all county roads that did not already have names, The list
y• - of proposed road name was posted and ninety days were allowed for public
ooss.ento' The Commissioners Court approved the list of proposed name, in-
oludint Fookrue Road, on September 13, 1976. Since the road is now in the
City limits, the City has the authority to rename the road, it necessary. In
Y ;sT an effort to resolve this matter, the road name issue was presented to the
Historic Landmark Commission which voted to retain the name Pockrus Road.
4i+ After a"publio hbaring, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend
that the road be named Page Road, r
e rs! Denise $Q ve {
kn
0300k
a'rra
~7+ A
r r
I1
e171SM4200 DIFW WAO e34-2520
~i+ .1.i ....M..~.•.nw..:.:a..awnaa.a~..n.r....arrMAAf~n~i.:w.. ....e... e.... ..'t+,~i ,ti
t,
I
8Y '
ti
t f c ~ '
a
IAa k ro0 Ac . y
0 ~21~ •e v ky E a ~ ` irrilt•,e,
21,61, N `t 04 !Jl\~' r ,j rOONNf lit-
y I;
At
c PJ a 0 V~oiaL1 2 ei2A. . ~~aAe. JKfLSO
0 9. ti, ~ t1At
Ac 19 b P Ctdtr 1toS. J P r. R I. k I.JF4
rFwrr 1R. 133.TriAe ANN.C.,S
rMt i
J 04-S *c
ACCO lnrr, ff II o Q~ q
o ~ 1r
~ nr.2 M, 3
sere.,-ua
ewrrw,trp 19 1 .Aa y d. t~ • q Z 131 it Ac
aA
g
f• d~i RJR y rOjk ply t• 4$#A6. IX/Ac g it.
V N ♦0 city } rL
b S. * Of ?A&
V W
qk 41 A• A 3 a
P ,A;P hb ~1~* 1r v It f Ad it' Ad, 4 ej 1~ Y
t VN J k s
A", OGV .JAb Wr K - „ b 3 v Z
F Lt i M Whq h a s Q Jt7.4, CIrY oh oQNro i
ALL I
"J Ac 30,4c M. 3.3N'V IAR0 =Ad H. P\r,~~4 C U SA
kk S u• J/t~ Jdr.~•',
34ILLIVAN P M. it,
{ 3~ \k ti ° b 144[Ac JtONNft
cOoQN80
P /RIAc [!.I A., 111,4 At,
I ta.rAr ~2OAc. id. yM 11.µy RAYMMVyJ 6R/M~
aslb jj4 ' N. II. 30.0 Aa.
13% ro gi
Ora/lu k $us.
a1N.lAc tf,4Ar, taAK 3e1
4ra ".0 At.24Jr
' a T1i0MAS A J.Y P tlt4 M. INt /NL, a t
1SA0. M.I 1eAr M f r 2tr WLt IA.0 a
w Y A• Jr-t/ a p r,ua1
1 k i c tat Ly, M 90 GOWr#r N K r., t '
S¢, JJ.JAc. N 77.2 At 11.eAt 2*aAd.
2tr~. I n rAr Af•It am 10 AI. J I[ONAft L
f St' Z sr. L. w[LL
136 AC
ar I,A~~ tAws Co.
M • Ix I,
a~ Q
,r
q 0 Pq Z w. arArr SCI D® J~
W t!.! As. yl 1 a J r 1996 r~
r • d
tut 1 . P arAr a;c~ 0j n CMV A.N r. ~A Y Y $
' at~Al 1b1At MAwalra+l f b°3u AMC
1 °y 3
a 4
f f/Ar a C / fle1. INC. A.
AI ;
7t',' ~wa ~L ` y f,~!lfAe I' y~ 011CAN CRffk I 13,4 V g ~Q
atewaaont P ~g r w 4JAc J\~6 aura. r
Ar
r~NwRr a
l . Ion \ky\ p\gQ~ ~iS A ►SAc ,
A<~ fi p ~ ~ ~ Y ~~INI R. ~ APP \ypb a I'
M n~~ eM / P 0 Joa
9 4AI,1 h M 4 • P4N. ,I, L t1'
Mf3 y 6 P d h o\~ TR, kk
1 el al. r, f 'i' Q K t&.w.
I.
4 a JtlAasO 13 z ~Qt~o t IA
w n XMOk1 a'lT, r J. fat.
y 4r J A. 1J A rtlr ~773aaa
furrow, R L 74lAc J-d-A &IMMON7 /s/ D[N TON P af, S fM, k~~ I \~jCS I/llelJ
r1, rAr IJAAr oAt '
I. .
IY .
P 6 Z Minutes s
January 28, 1987 y
Page d
{ STAFF REPORT= Ms, Spivey stated that even though most
Denton evelopment Guide policies have been met, staff has
some reservations about the capacity of the day car.
center. She said that white a day care center may be a as
needed neighborhood service, one accommodating two hundred r,
children cannot be effectively blended into the area with-
out damaging the character of the neighborhood, The poten-
tial noise and traffic Impact of such a large number of
children could be detrimentiai to the neighborhood. She
1 said a day care center accommodating 200 children in terms
of traffic analysis is score of a comsercial type use and
is not the least intense most logical land use for this
area which is over the Intensity standard. She added that
staff recommends denial of Z-1831.
k REBUTTAL: Mr. Edwards stated that their traffic analysis
s oT xsTffat they will have the level of service A which is
the best rating in terms of traffic. He said that 200
children will not be delivered at one lime to this site.
± He said that the overall intensity has already been viola•
ted but that they have made sure that the capacityy of the
° road system is adequate. He said that he fell thla is a
very needed facility In an area .hlch is growing.
r
' Chair declared the public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr, Claiborne stateLl that there is certainly
consideration of infiltration of a neighborhood with e
commercial establishment. He said that this is a change
of land use from residential to a commercial use. He said
r `f that with the elementary school within the vicinity there
3 will be a potential traffic impact with another 100 chi l•
d dren, Me said compatibility of land use is consistent with
the school in the area. He said the use Is a neighborhood
;E service but the sire Is a consideration.
Ms. Brock stated that this pro act has the nature of a
commercial enterprise rather tan neighborhood service,
It Ms. Brock moved to recommend denial of 2.1151. Seconded
by Ms. Cole.
Mr. Escue stated that if it were not for the fact that the
intensity is over the standard in the area this would be
an admirable project and he would like to see this type of
development.
et Vote was called and motion carried (S-0. Mr. Claiborne
voted no.
A Mr. Holt returned to the meeting.
8 E. CORRECT NAME FOR PAIGE/POCRRUS ROAD,
t, STAF?_EPORit Ms, Spivey stated that in 19850 Polge/
rs.` oc rug oa was annexed into the City of Denton. She
said after consulting the Denton County Map, the Traffic
Engineering Division posted signs Identifying the street
as Pockrus Road, She said that this action generated a
store of protest from residents of the area who believe
that Pat ea Road is the correct name for the street. in
4 researching the matter, staff determined that the street
was CountyfCommissionamd ners Court She aid
DentontCounty His or-
itai Survey Committee to ,ingest names for all county toads
+4. that did not already have names. The list of proposed road
coeeenwit yosted and ninety days were allowed for public
p The Commissioners Court approved the list of d sed 1976. U nto theiroaddis now in theotityoI mi tst the city
.14..,
k
qt
I
F
P E 2 Minutes
lanaary 28, 1987
Pose 9
3
has the authority to rename the road, if necessary. In an
1 effort to resolve the matter, the road name issue was pre-
sented to the historic landmark Commismion which voted to
retain the name Pockrus Road. The Plan,in/ and toning
M Commission's recommendation on this matter will be for- ,w
warded to the City Council for final disposition of this :T
issue. a
Ms. Brack asked if the road is legally Pockrus Road.
Ms. Spivey said yes. Ms. Brack asked how people are
getting their mall. Ms. S Ivey sold that the postal
service has changed from tome to time.
Mr. Claiborne asked if there were signs that designated
the road as Paige Road. Ms. Spivey said yes but the signs g'
have been changed from time to time. Mr. Claiborne asked
who erected the signs. Ms. Spivey said originally the
county erected the signs. She sold for a period of time a
there were no signs. She said after annexation the city
erected the Pockrus Road sign. She stated that there was
some confusion and name has been changed back and forth
since.
.
.
7r
~h. Mr. lemman asked If Paige was the older of the two names.
Ms. Spivey said yes.
"r Ms. Carton asked for the current sign name. Ms. Spivey
said Pockrus.
1 CITIZEN C0041NTSt Frances Gregg, property owner, stated
e that she puised 13 acres in this area. She said that
she operated a business in this area from 1973 to 19s4 and
that she needed a street name to advertise the business.
She said that the city and county had no name and she was
told'to talk lu the old settlers in the area. She said
that whiia attending the trade days in the area she was
told that the area used to be Old Page Town and was named
} after Dr. 'ale who had lived in this area for years, She
soil that Page was syelled like pale in a book. She said
'k a that the settlers said the road used to be named Harbert
Road when it was a dirt road. She said that she was told
to take inforeatlon to the Historical Society because it
was their project. She said that she did submit Informa-
tion and was finally told that the name would be Pa a good
officiallyy. She said that the city Aid erect the f~rst
sign and It has been chanted back forth several tines.
Alice Pockrus, property owner, stated that she has lived
here tot 45 years. She sold that Paige Road sots to the
back of their place. She sold that someone from Planning
Department called and asked what her husband would like
the rood to be oared. He suggested Pate load because the
area used to be Old Page Town. She sold that when the
iM Pockrus koad ei n appeared they wer^ thrilled, She said
that she felt there was no one let, cc remember the old
Pale Town. She said that when the substation was built
the road was named Pockrus. She added that people move in
and out of the mobile home park and felt tnot it would not
matter to them. She said that she would like to set it
remain Pockrus Road if feasible.
e
„r Mr. Holt asked how long the Pockrus family has lived in
this area. Ms. Pockrus stated that her husband's father
lived In this area all his life,
s Lucy Jones, Manager of Sherwood Wilt Home Park, stated
that this road name has caused a at of confusion. She
sold that the residents and she wculd like this resolved
s.
r•'~- and like to see the street named Pate Road,
` / x F
M
F.
F
A
YEA ~ i 6
l
P 6 Z Minutes
January 28, 1987
Page 10 '
Betty Richmond, resident in Sherwood Mobile Home Park,
stated that her address used to be Rt. 7, Dos SB and that
} she received a note from the ppost office after being an-
nexed that her address would be 1750 Paige Road. She said
that th,re has been considerable confusion. She said that
her address has changed four times in the eleven years that i
she has lived here. T
i
Ms. Richmond asked for those in favor of Page Road to
j stand. Five people stood up.
j Ms. Gregg stated that their plats have Page Road,
' Ms. Pockrus stated that if It would help the people in;
this area, then name it Page Road,
i" Y, Carson stated that staff has suggested Paige/Pockrus
Road.
Mr. Clark stated that the "t" in the Paige Is a mistake
and should be taken out.
r Ms Gregg asked that they make the road name easy, not
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Claiborne stated that he sould like to have
1 { som-e aeThod of encouraging recognition of the Pockrus name
because the Pockrus family has been In the area for years,
a
Mr. Halt stated that he assumed the County Historical
Committeo had some kind of data to name it Pockrus Pood,
Mt. lanman stated that It may not be that way.
a Mr. Claiborne asked If the platted property had Page
Read, Mr. Clark stated that the older plats of the 40s {
and Sos have Page Road.
Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend that the road be named
" Page/Pockrus without the "i".
Motion died for a lick of second.
Frig r.
-F Mr, Holt moved to recommend that the road be named Pockrus
Road.
r` Motion died for a lack of second.
Mr. kamman moved to recommend that the road be named Page
Road. Seconded by Mo. Cole and motion carried unanimously
Lill".
IV. CONSIDERATIONS
As PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE EVERS PARR ADDITION, Lots 1 and 2,
Item was withdrawn by the petitioner,
B, PkELIMINARY PLAT OF THE NORTHRIDGE SUBDIVISION, Lots 4-9
an , oc Z.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Clark stated that the area has a drain-
AS problem which affects the Northridge property owners.
< He sold that the preliminary plat is In order but staff
I: would like a condition that ene drainage would be safelyy
handled without nffecting property owners in the North H dge
Addition.
.
1 I?
Ile.
Z ~
HLC Minutes
March 10, 1986
Page 9
t
Mr Cochran complimented Mr. Lawry on including s2 general
principle. He stated that he feels concerns are covered
by this document.
Mr. Marino left the meeting.
Mr. Lorry advised that Texas Historical Commssion has j
published an 84 page document on construction standards
and repairs which might be helpful for fine tuning.
i Signage 01, was discussed. On question, Ms. Spivey
advised that Citf of Denton sign orJinance allows teor.
racy political signs of 31 square feet, maximum. It as
concentus of Commission to leave 11 as is.
Roll all vote: Miller, Lowry, Boyd, Conrady, Fickey,
C Matthews, Lawrence and Cochran voted aye. Motion carried
unanimously (8•D).
Mr. Fi-c-keeyy-l~cft the meeting.
r!FiC. Discussioa and approval of name of PaigelPockrus Road.
Ms. Spivey stated that the street has been known by both
names, Paige and Pockrus. She said in 1974 the Denton
y County Historical Commission cue up with the name of
t. Pockrus. The people have called it Paige and the city has
always called It Paige since it was annexed, the city
assigned street numbers to Pmlta and people had addresses
t changed to Paige; then, wben city started to put up Paige
Road signs staff was advised that street name should be
ge! Pockrus. She added that many property owners are upset
about havin to change back to Pockrus. She s oke to
Yvonne Jenh~ns, also to the county staff, and information
t- that staff has is that the portion in the city and in its
extraterritorial Jurisdiction can be named whatever the
city wants to name it. She said that Ms. Jenkins does not t
have a roblem witb ta111a{ it Paigte Road. Staff reeds to
i take soothing to Planains and ioaino Commission and City
r•; Council and property owners who have contacted staff want
street named Paigs Road.
P Mr. Lowry explained that County Commissioners delegated "
this to the Denton County Historical Commission and after
a rather lengthy series of meetings, names were generated
based on historic settlers. He said he didn't know whether
Pockrus was the correct name, be didn't think tt was. A
r public hearinj was held on courthouse lawn and some people
did oblact. He further stated he would like Paige but all
" historical records show Pockrus R:ei and he feels it city
is going to annex property, it c.ty's obligation to
annex name as it exists.
Mr. Miller asked where name Paige came from and Ms. Spivey
replied that a family established it as Faige or Paige/
Pockrus.
Mr. Boyd stated it appears that Pockrus is historical ~
fi r. see; Ae feels Commission should stick with Denton County
r Historical Commission and recommend name Pockrus to city
_ Council and so moved. Second:d by Mr. Lawrence.
Mr. Lowry advised that the naac was established by
Commissioners Court.
y.. 3 Mr. Boyd added that since Pockru:i is legal name and Paige
was community named, he teals that Commission should stick
with Yockrus, that names should not be arbitrarily changed.
Roll call rotes Miller, Lowry, Boyd, Coorsdy, Matthews,
Lawrence and Cochran voted aye, Motion carried unani•
mousiy (T•0).
}
Meeting adjourned it 6n20 p.m. ,
Q
ti,
1
A
1718L
1
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PROVIDING FOR THE
NAMING OF A PUBLIC STREET SITUATED IN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
11i THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of
Denton, Texas has recommended that the road previously referred
to or called "Pockrus", "Paige" or "Page" Road, be formally
named and designated as Page Road; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the road located within the City of Denton
} and ezte`-n3Yng from its intersection with the I-3SE Service Road
to its intersection with Swisher Road and previously referred to
a as "Pockrus", "Paige", or "Page" Road, be formally named and
designated as Page Road.
} SECTION II. That the City Council authorizes and directs
that t e official map of the City of Denton be amended to show
the street designation approved.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
A,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987•
c
,x 3
RAY 3R E O
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
JMIFER KALTERSj ACTING CITY-SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
1
BY: CD .
J
.l .
I
i p
' r s M B , nro.n i .r 1-1- S:4 Ja
° F
y
v
n
DATE: 3,/10/87
f y,
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Q A
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Kan•sger
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF GEIRRAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE SURREY RIDGE
ADDITION; PRBLIKINARY RIPLAT OF LOTS 1-4, BLOCK b, NORTHSIDE
ADDITION; PRE41KINARY PLAT OF THE SOUTHEAST AIRPORT ADDITION,
LOT 1, BLOCK 1
RCOMMENDATION:
F.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.
~ c
Development proposed In the order listed: Mixed use planned
development (PD-90) at Loop 288 and Sherman Drive with first phase a
of single family (SP-10) and 10 aore retail site= construction of
i a new office facilities for Denton Board of Realtors; 81 acres of
Denton Kunieipal Airport property being platted to allow public
improvements (water lines, roads, drainage, aprons, etc.). t
BACKGROUND'
u NA
rY '
" PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECT 0:
Property owners and City of Dentin
FISCAL IMPACT'
Undetermined
J ti Rc apt
Lloyd arreII
a; Prepared by: , City Kaneger
David Ellison
Senior Piannor
APP v
Jett Msy
Director of plerving
and Development
18T1e/2
a
Y
.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
!j
MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987
SUBJEC'T': Preliminary plat of the Southeast Airport
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1
SUMMARY: This is the preliminary plat of an 81.477 acre
portion of the City of Denton Municipal Airport
property. Infrastructure improvements (utilities
t; and roads) taxiways, a helipad, and a run-up
apron will be constructed and a lot of record
" c r:nd engineering plans have been prepared for
review and approval to comply with requirements
a 3 applicable to private developers. The City will d
maintain ownership of the property and lease
lots to individuals and corporations proposing
structural improvements.
Five hundred thousand dollars of general
' obligation bonds is funding basic infra-
structure improvements and the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) is funding construction
of the taxiways, helipad, and holding apron.
Infrastructure improvements include overlay of
a section of Underwood Road; development of an
internal private road network; major culvert
„ improvements and channel work at the southwest
ti corner of the site; a 12" water line along the
north-south road west of Underwood Road; a
1 12" water line along east-west roads between
} Underwood and north-south road to the west of
Underwood; 8" looped water lines around hangers ='I
In area of taxiway "J"; and 8" sanitary sewer
' lines on a portion of the area to be developed.
The flow analysis used to determine water line
sizes were based on industrial capacity of 3,000
gallons per minute.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RrCOMMENDAITON: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,
✓ ALTERNATIVE: Approval
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
'r
avid Ellison
Senior Planner
. e
a
' 18315/2
•
{
is
lee .v..-, .n
r.:
a
w i
Iqjjti
1'}
!
`'~IPe ?.l~sa . .ice-~ _ ~ 1 t. .,1_ _ -
15504t'5000' RUNIMLY 17-3~
t
~ ' _ ^ F tom!'"... a....l y .'~L '
1 pK ~ , i L i w.rw•«n rr w:rrrr
k ~ ~ ! F r'~~I : ~ / J~` O r.rwr.., rru rr.rrou
1 ( IP v.rYwrrr rr w'. r.rr
! r j O Iw.w ur .n. ru rr..1ww
'
F I'-A ~ t.. 'J ' Ml w. • y ~ III
mob.
10 It I.
17
{t' 1 I I~If r• ` ~ 1I wry.
t
• DEPaATNENT OF PWLIC WORKS-C1TY OP DENTON Tt%Lt I mo' r ~'^t'~' LLLZ
wa.~ w.V: wi r.. a:i a r:le~.i II' l~ .Lt ICS
Q ~.a;!. ~.kti .
''w .arat r.uw rrtevtrern IL1.✓J/ ~t ~ ~r t.. t.
w ru ~Ir.~.y~
ttrur t.rovr a rvruw r, t,t ruo •MY5 riot CMt.Y -.~.wne
.1
♦
rt
c
i
110
`w u
a
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET #
f~1n A . ,
f
MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987
SUBJECT: Approval of the Preliminary Replat of the
I Northside Addition, Lots 1R, 2R, and 3R, Block 6 `
SUMMARY: This .7654 acre tract is located at the north-
west corner of North Elm and First Streets.
` The property is zoned office (0) and will be
utilized as new office space for the Denton
! Board of Realtors. This replat converts four y
existing 45-50 foot lots into three 65 foot lots.
An average building line of 22.5 feet is
reflected on the replat. A single curb cut
? (existing) will be retained on Lot 3R and one
ry additional curb cut (entrance only) will be
petmitted on North Elm Street. Egress from the
property will be from First Street or the alley.
;£t insufficient fire flow necessitates that a new
7. water line and hydrant be installed. A 16 foot
utility easement will be required along North
Elm. Adequate wastewater and electric services
,r ate in place.
SY' ACTION REQUIRED: Approval
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning commission recommends
approval of the preliminary replat of the
Northside Addition, Lots lR, 2R, and 3R, Block 6.
v ALTERNATIVE: Approval
6 j
y; ATTACHMENT-. Reduced plat
sf f ~
v
,
a
S
• i
~L
Ilk
.1
r
e
J ♦ "M i .
vxa eae ~ v ~
LOT 4.
+ y on ae'auno ;
Y s: is. 10
_ f
M IH7..
•
Two4 ow 9 ours saw or uatooo I '
I +
? M, 1•u-n
'i to bR t c
LOT 2
7-7 7 Al
L - I Z
M'
sow or seunss s: ' ~ f
' rPt~l..lhIINARY R~Pt,kf
sa.` wr-r► 3 ►sfn ' L(!T ! xf•.:
; ~ ~ r ~ ~w - 40f5 1.4. NAIL 6
a`. a ~ I 1JCR1Nfillk. AODrfiol~
r` v.~ n a. eewxc ti dJ idWa
r 7 a v. awra
Ald
• ua a.;. ~ ter,. r l _
MAW 0,
~ "s it
r
~ ~ +~ssn\ nnW1s' 'L/it~b~'ry \i~a ~'-t3 , ~V
ME
d.-
c~
:a
t
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987
e. SUBJECT: Approval of the General Development Plan of the
Surrey Ridge Addition
SUMMARY: The attached general development plan has been
submitted by the owners of the 129 acre
mixed-use planned development (PD-90 and 90.1)
located east of Sherman Drive, north of Kings
Row, and bisected by Loop 288. No development
is anticipated. The owners do intend to install
a portion of the utility trunk system to
stimulate interest in the property. A
preliminary plat of a 45 acre single family
detached (SP-10) portion of the planned
development was approved on June 18, 1985.
Article 111. 3.05, Subparagraph (H) of the
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations
states in part that "when a development is a
3. portion of a large tract under one ownership or
1 is to be developed in phases, the developer may
be required to submit a general development plan
for review and approval by the Planning and
zoning commission..." The purpose of the
general development plan is to allow the
Planning and Zoning Commission an opport1+nity to
review proposed major thoroughfare and collector
street patterns, land use, and the relationship
to adjoining subdivisions or properties. The
following guidelines are utilized to determine
when a general development plan will be required:
1. When a development is a portion of a larger
All
tract under one ownership;
2. A proposed subdivision is to be developed in
phases;
3. When off-site road, drainage, or utility
connections have major alternative
i possibilities;
4. When a proposed development's roads,
drainage, utilities, or other such
improvements may have a major impact on
adjacent or nearby private or public
wv s properties;
5. When the impact of off-site roads, drainage,
utilities or other such improvements cannot
be determined by a limited area plan.
tf 'pf
r
1 . by '~n
e
City Council Back-up z
March 10, 1987
Page 2
'd
f A courtesy notice is mailed to all abutting
K+ property owners of record ten (10) days prior to
the Planning and Zoninq commission action if the
plan consists of more than one hundred (100)
acres. Staff and the Planning and Zoning
Commission did not receive any feedback from
abutting property owners regarding technical
questions or concerns.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the General Development plan
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
bfi The Development Review Committee, property
owners and riwner's engineering representative(s)
' have spent several months reviewing this plan in
an attempt to insure that conceptual plans for
future public improvements are satisfactory and
1 capable of being used as a clear guideline and
plan for public improvements when the property
F is developed and/or subdivided.
ATTACHMENT: Land Use Layout/Preliminary Plans in Sections
1 {
i t
David Ellison
f i Senior Planner
r
r~r~ y
2
y
+
P Y
r ~ lfl9s
h y
ti
66~ t
l
e
' CITY of DENTON / 2ts EY McKinney / Denton, Texas 7&
' I MEMORANDUM
' DATE: January 12, 1987
TO: Surrey Ridge File
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer PTe -
V I v
I SUBJECT: Drainage Component of the General Development Plan
NI , The General Development Plan shows the entire ultimate drainage
system necessary for a tract to develop. This is consistent
` wiith the water and sanitary sewer system in that some over
sizing will be necessary to handle other tracts using the same
trunk line. This coulc place undue hardship on a developer who
" had purchased the property without comple~e knowledge of '
r ;9 commitment of infra structure made by the original
owner/developer.
A developer will be responsible for installing the entir
ultimate sized system through the property being developed.
this, Is consistent with the Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
Offsite {downstream}, improvements shall consist of a s stem
4 + large enough to carry water g
t ~i developed and water that is or could erunbythrthe racein
ought thet by system
from upper reaches of the drainage basin. This system will
rh gnd to the point shown on the general development plan.
"partial system" shall be designed so that It can be
easily incorporated Into the ultimate design without removal or
unnecessary reworking. Finally, the "partial system" shall be
as maintainable as the ultimate improvements in case the
development of remaining tracts is delayed or abandoned.
The Engineering Division will be happy to discuss any
reasonable proposal that will allow the ultimate system to be
4q ! installed in an efficient cost effective manner.
x 0414E
5, 11
r
A
yam'
hz,
i
i
-40
so 9*
?M 1
GRMQ.tlObf ,'R%K'tA ~ °b 0•It
N Yt Y
JL"4#IY1JI0
I rµwrratlnr. t 'S
MC 4
1
'A 4b
!F s*'; Y~11VV
Mir
NtTN'~.t i JJJ b)t
t/'At L t
/r At,
}}llam~ ~ Nb•N'JI'
..r' t1•!r'Ar•f r1!
INI / ~i DIY
s ~ .r L t• J A N 1 111r ~t i r
tt-
.0,
t s . ~yl ,
s r Lr l1we
S ~ ft! Ir~C. I
II \TI,~. fW~...•s
AfAlsrs a hreseN
r.. 111 ~ ~ / .y gz•va."=z.•
y rn• A"WV
" ~ LIOL~D:
' . 10 0 C p1/01Tt DRbGAOt R MUD
0!1 ma RAY" GLOW G[0
i NEEDHAM I WRIGHT- ,LASKEY ENGINEERS INC.I DALLAS,TEMS SHEET NCI. /A
' GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF 104.6 Bi 25.5 ACRE TRACTS,OENTON TEXAS PAOJ ECT K 8 5-409-04
PAVING B DRAINAGE DATE: NOV. 25, ISM
M ...n i I r 5Pt }i ~f f t y yy ,r:y 5•`i ~ •4Y'<SY ?9'
+ti4 4 `~z''"r'~«:,t~'~C i'~'4•,;,~r~' ~a5 w~a.~zNl t.s,f, a, <C7~.s, .;r~°Yfl, i~ .I..
c
I
i
Exist a' w mrtR
Nor.,D,W Iw KMt s NK
t TNIt 18-WOffiR MAIN IN
GR+aw~er v~/av w+tE rr a 90'a4% caalMC nrt
~ `ter h <LS'~
,p60' b'uranr taNY
O M/It'YSTts MAIN 5
e¢ ti
1tti Nip. r jfel
i Y Sq /Y/✓r1P' y6~
. t qp.
,W- ev
~l4 L a'y x/ti wartir MAIN
AMf'NAr' wm* *jf1.
1 t W SW !Wall f
' 4"I , • V + wattA MIN
2WR +
"Ito I y1 rt l'itf u~lriiaE wnw i ~ r 4 y ¢ ' ~ W r srn
l ee 1. s,f tqe I
,h IYAr
~ r wi ~ ~ M~SSL✓Llviuav
I a r f.M4 ~l r'~~.f~}{ra d
ff i
b'roR 4y'~t6 6
•w I •
/1' p.# N , 3
r
444..' L.'/.+Ir•
TD tl,tO wN q' yriTr taHr LM c flNe nrt .
xfnl T[R ha1N Fait IFS NNTta MAIN
twles tiwa Kvetato
ini ter CtFtIYt w~r[R irewua~ '
VIAV"Wi b"W t tANOW KIN tat ILD
' WftD,HAM 1 WRIGHT-`LASKEY ENGINEERS INC.- DALLA9,MAS SHEE7NO./,B
GENtRAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF: 104.6 81 26.5 ACRE TRACTS,DENTON TEXAS PROJUTft85-409-04
OtILItIE$ DA76 NOV. 986
...r. - ;.G~. 'r 4 ?4S.f rv+iJ:!.' ' 'zk •r~ k t• PZa r`~ ;.'^'7W'?RJy '
S
I~
1
.
j
f,
00 T7' ~
wRd \<~~i fps
GRMS G/ ipO, Val 0
JN f• i•4ryMr.ra+4f!laYRe
rearrrw wn ~+,~'<*C•~'fc1~ , u, ~ .f; ~y9
ow s,- 30,
wit ~mo
t ~ fbriti+~ +e+.u.nr" C v
/ ~~5~~ ~ I 4NJ •e. IIII f iiTj•N'f
1 N/M ~a~• ~ V DAVMyM-
~'Jr •
IH s p a1
er.s'sa•
. I ' ryN'ML f .
re
S)d ;n ~ / ~12 ' ~ ~ ✓ J~~a: ff~, MRSSrV f lVI1 SOA!
C„ y 7 Ir
' TRACT b:kN DmLO►tp
(Q00 OMNT[ WIAINAO[ U0010
NE row AM • WR16AT LASKEY ENGINEERS INC.a DALLAS,TEXAS SHEET NO. ZA
a3~« OENERAL-DEVELOPMENT PLAN 6 104.6 a 25.5 ACRE TRACTS,DENTON TEXAS PROJECTrO,85-! 09-04
PAviNO a' DRAINAGE DATE-. Nov, 25, IM
y '.q '~~;1`✓ A A~4~x`.~',."~P~e~~~`~ V,':'i.+~1~5'/af`r'~sy~~l~'t
,f
0 MIA
MM
q MfTAN If "601 FNR W
LItpR['flnt FIII ACROSI
CIL
LAMER/OOi v~;rK6 T ~
JfMO.Y JlON Alf ti y, 4~a «
'a r~' JO UrAJfv [SnY
IIIIIII T p0~ M/I[' HATER MAIII
el ,
i N N i30'J°r''# N"~/ li~ C ~tZM ^ry4~ l~ JA. , /t'MwM 10 CyV
f ~ ro / ~c 1IVI` ~a ! [ Q y~
to ~ ~I IA 4~~~
ti o
N•/'?!'Qe'~ f f S.S [~:ta Wyo.
p1 s! ~,7 1~1 i I~J n eye '4 . ~•b•a. II/x'YAUr ~M
N •VVt~ \ III ~ i=Z ` ~
'w Mow
I ! J.AyYY
0&0 V
1V ly ~~r
~J 1
NLM •A2f/r!1
I I /
h ~'yrAII.IIt [:N r \ ' TIIJf !nf
' } I ftiT Ily! I I['NAKR MRS, i / • i
A.111%W I 0,14 got"'
r i 1 n: ~ou , ~ 1 41=02 pssur w/vav
L ;M j ids F
I JT Or• . N
#4jo 'o C, EP It
~J•WNr t.'4yv
Ya eROrvN u' yrlure lJrer- u' [9fIAa MAIN
fNATIR MAIA FOR N MAC[I,
LIMAN
T" 'a BuNO D[VtwftD
t Mll w o"11-t vA UA RIEWIM
;v0►NIt't WIItAAY itwtA RtWll1[0 SH£Et NO,
28 '
EVA'A r WRIGHT, LASKO ENGINEERS INCrf 0ALLASAXAS
PaaEct Na 85-409-04
o NERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF 104.5 a 25.5 ACRE TRACTSIDENTON TEXAS DATE: NOV. 26,191,J
UTILITIES
a_
00
y
ti
.~fIAD/V/fION .
raw WAR, 'J~vt~trwt `I / ~ r . w1
F l► ~P' 4 A `4Of✓~ i~V'
NS~• y oe•N } ~ i ra• ti1y
~ .a r~r:rrrt ~ v"y!f
hw.ur/rr ~ NrYM'A•J ~
Nf/ N•fe• 10
RxeWO,
.'w't r.r ~p1 /r H'.
1336 J i1T:*
I so,
17
lei
. k I bus G II .I•!• ~ f ~ ~ ~ / N [ ~ ~ II
FMDSSiI } ~aueN
' ' ) / ~ !1~~,•+' ~{'A'..JJ~ J41
Ar l .
40
&I "INC.
' f.Yt/ .AJ, r . i fry FJ
TD AVOWAd
tMCt (LINO MUDItD
r0, 6 4 O DrHltt OMMNA69 N[GUIR[c
~ OMNtt ♦AYINO MOURID
(~EMAM WRIONT- LASKEY ENGINEERS INC.' DALU1S,iEXA9 SHEET NO.
04
tNftAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF 104.6 81 26.5 ACRE TRACTS,DENTON TEXAS 'm "
PAVING 8 DOINAGE DAVE; NOV. 26119"
_ &
y
a
t
\ t[IRL waT 111 a ~ w W
wit [~V
N Rtp,w~
to. °•PM Mflatt 1s•wNr[R MAIN IN
[AT, 94 CkIll [ rift PCM"$
`S
W qy
LrtMOR/0OE SR:rRR6 1r t~r'-`.
y(,IOrM'JfON 7
AD of"l 91
T III *O~ w/4['Na1[R MAIM
6 ~r 7y >r~ J 1~ 1
7G NN ='IOn'N •~pµyll/ ~II dNay ~>I11.y Is, /MMwM~ ,~oyC
fer,Ft Ill ~ ra 8~F`_p
ff r 1'
1 III Y 4ll1e~ r ~
PAO'
~a~1`~.. Jaf ../,t El/w. ~4•
~1' ~~I tg l roe'AC ^ 'r'•b. TriliL{sN'r-
Ilt_!3 °yL w/la'wartR Haiti
Aw a 9[ H'lr} M1J r [ T
04 6
11MNRF L+ ' N n~ n I I, a N7 H' 'I •t 1t'twayte mow
y w r y+. w
y1y I rlFo jiirl I[[TIR MM~ 04
N[ tYle I ♦ I+ frtwly A
2 l
• I ,I INwVAr ~f~~ 1 4 1~ •ua/,tt~• I MF-mv,0 owtIll" .
04 ryl /stKer~J,r f
P"r
-
p N w•♦ . 1
JP 0"*W Ip qn`1t Y [ t1T b' llyNetl Ar[
MJ■ w117[R I7aIn FL* It M111[R 04
u _
C
I
"Act um 0molto
~/11'0~"I11i1 VA12A RtW*90
~~'tl~ O/f/Ift,MMtAf1Y lhYM R[OUM[D
AM.t 1VROHT4'LASKEY ENGINEERS INC.t DALLI9,TEXAS SHEET NO 3&
NtAAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF 10416 ei 25.5 ACRE TRACTSIDENION TEXAS PaoJecs Nd 85-40-04
UTILITIES DATE; NOV123,1986
1
I
I
Vol
go'
fl4v
d;%
CRMQRIOM .,Q.vRed i ,`L~t
o-f N0
T Y 1 e ~A,o
~ea pyw Ga ittwr. ~~`b. 53
i
r 11 n •y I%.
'v Do- 30- 0o'W 1.
pf,
1 v V7
~f~rfLewsavu' h.At. MrL•h;fi'Iy\
N/N ~.~•t / dtVt4*. Ir N
l NfA4L'}.~•~ 1 N'tf'u'[
n3~ II ~0 rlOa 4N JI#VAe
r Cr,7ikr'L
mod"v
. / Y ` • NMI 11 $~I ~ ",4'~JG e;".7i'}~.~,'• ` r\ • ' ~
Ivx
'La
spi
c,
. -r IRO WN
` ~ LlNlgl
"ACT "06 NvIru 0
dIJ917t ~AVOIO ACOU010
NEEDHAM : WRIGHT- LASKEY ENGINEERS INC.- DALus,TWS sHEETNo
dEIVERAt, DEI/ELOPMENT PLAN OF 104.6 8 25.5 ACRE TRACTS,DENTON TEXAS pF*kcTNa 85-* 9-Od; ;
PAVING' a DRAINAGE DATEi NOV. 251
r
.
1
I
' bast 0 N6rlII
K4t p Rp
asr~~~;w ayy~
W PILL N11TN NMM W
trop ♦ c►smo ran Pcaoll 41
/A! I I ry~• b'uTlurY S!H'r t
'P III 40~, wl%emmiv MMN ep ~1~
NCI tM 1f~N r~•tNl!/ I I MMwb 5p ,
Np N'fd 1. I 4.
N pa ,I III dt►(A)91t. ~+y"o-
y~ \ ,li► a ecie t °iy p/r w~rN w
n I ►~,9 MYr~~ try .t. 'i { 91N9I11
/ ~N w1 I ►a y ( ' Nsipl MAN
II y~
1. AO 2ue✓~ttv u whoa rllal i ra1 r
us 3'10 I f j9'. /~r NN„w
~ { I It I MAS!!f IWKSON .
AYMPIVA
po., 44
a •w - q~ N'Mrnr~ N '
,woA~
XP BROWN 11~ }I`11Y lS1Tr 114' ( SINC M
Nf Ry MSIls MMh 11011 I1~NIItt1 nim
L[KN07 .
. TMCT /tlN/ DCW Ln►ro ,
' 4ti ~ it 01►Iltl ItITtA AEOWAtO
* ~ 01'//ITt IAl11TM1'ttWtA AlWal[0
N~t~M +'WNfON7~ LASKEY ENGINEERS INO.r DALEA9,TEXA4 SHEEfMO~ '
~IVC"RAL~'iS~V~LOpM~NT !'LAN OF 104.6 A 25.5 ACfiE TFiACTS,DEN`CON TEXAS. PROJECT N0.s5-409.64
tiTILITI~S ~ DATE': NOV. 25,1988
1 eel '
1
0
f
E4 ~ ~'rMgy 1\
JWON/l/pN ~l~
nrwr Rr~+w.rr r.+r. 1 ~ ~'Llr. 1
ro+ rnw ,w'r+ 1 .4p
N Y' OD'YJ 1n 4.
!N' ff' • 1,
Il J
NIR l►'
ANCA I 1 . ~ ~ ~
AMA %z I AWE&
7D' 61 /s
IV 110:11.,
L ~ I JN'H'+a't
. II N rM N'!I',
v '
~ D tr~~a F" !
♦y ' ♦1 H• I • / 1 I
a ,i/µe. t/r 111 I
~ ~ M ueul_ { ~ ! - 'o \
01
t NA
a - 4
r o, M"WN
t` ~ fMCf ItNN DNtIOrtD
' ~ 0 0 O DIl117[ DIIAINM[ M01NIItD
.`00HAM R Wit Ht- LASKEY ENGINEERS INC.o OALLAS,TWS BHEETNO.S
kWAL DEVLOI-WNT PLAN OF 104.6 a 25.5 ACRE TRACTS,DENTON TEXAS Pf1 ACT1468q-409-04
PAVING 6' DRAINAGE oATe7 NOV. 25,
+ t
E
r
4
.
r
azu,' NasaN
ee fo"
A, p,)1 R111 wsru MaN M
ewrm06! Sq'Me6 M i r6a cafmc 0-alt xAOff
J40,Y111O.`/ ,1r 0,4yc 4~
~ I r~~ 4 b'unutr Rrn' tf
c II O~ W/2 NAM III'"
i N M .fa' ~'w J aJ y~D , '
fff tM ~IIY `~I l e w ry l
co A-va"
Iwl ne I 777 C
Z ~ III I ~ ~f'y. V r`
1
N!N fa~•~ !I f \
NA1LR M ,
k I Iie M!N' A o f Wi •{arl {aNLN 1
waft" .40"
TY Y M
^ lfRO_ ~~II 1P{i11 urMlRR haIMJ ~1a ad
"a "d
j I esal cz~X ~i ~ y b au/!e~yISJtI1 N~tfav
_ I
a~ro»tiR
t~
oto
a •w - -
N•A%*r
.YO-0RO ww yM11tI~rtr {frtt , ao e1VNe /fir[
N/IL 1AR MAIN foR U N117111 Ni11F
~ tMCr rclNa Dtvnrrto
W~~, Off11Tt MMiCA RiGUIRLD '
5. 01fMT! lAIIItAR'f lCrrlR AiOUtlItO .
y OHAM WRIOHY• LASK£Y ENGINEERS INC., OALLA9,7EXA9 VEET NO.
Se
. f Al. `DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF. 104.6 81 25.5 ACRE TRACMDENTON TEXAS Roitcl No, 0-409-04
UTILItISS 0AT6t NOV. 25, loss
400t~rM7Ar.'t#.Mn+'1~lAPO1~lY
1
S
Ali
I
4
1D
Cl"OfDENMN rEXA$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(811)566-8200
pi
February 12,1987
' M E M O R A N D U M
M
TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council
` FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician
t THRU: William J. Anderson, Assistant Director of Finance
E SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund
RECOMMENDATION:
Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued.
g r 9URWAAY:
y Chapter 31, Section 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code
requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing
unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. Taxpayer,
Grady Gandee, has requested a refund in the amount of
$1278.94 for a double payment of City tax during the years x
of 1984 and 1985 on account number 2180-02100.
BACKGROUND:
Duplicate payments for both 1984 and 1985 tax years were
paid by the Mortgage Company and Mr. Gandee. Our records
F` indicate a total of $2557.88 was paid against a tax base
g k of $1278.94.
ry ys t FISCAL IMPACT:
$1278.94 to be refunded,
At - Respectfully sulAttted,
+r„oi"~.{/7L✓ ~WC'/L 11~~ClXP~ '
Victor Schneider Tax echnician
er i :
William n erson
t s
Assistant Director of Finance X
r
rr
i'
• «,lr . lei{°'.', rR,.a:..'A:... _
Y ya rt
1
State Property Tax Board
Tax Refund Application 31,11 (2/82)
i
APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
1 Collecting Office Marie
Collecting Tax For. City of Denton Tax De artment
ax ng n is
215 E. b+cltinney Denton, Texas 76201
ress
City, State Zip Code
, the following information must be provided
In order to apply for a tax refund.
by the taxpayer.
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER:
Name:
Address: 3206 Qr_iQ Denton 7
988-3545
Telephone Wum er a ona in oraia on s nee e
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY:
Description of Property: _ging'-^ Oaks R]or., ±;._Lmt "
ys . , i ress or oca on o roper y: 06 Oriole
Account Number of Property: 2160-02100_ or ax ece p Number:
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES:
;I dame of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of Tax
From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund
Is Requested Ls Requested- Tax Pa meet- Taxes Paid Requested
n
A., ~ /19n 55as.m S
1,
k 2. ciiJt+ y of on 19 iq /198& $ 685.1.5
3. G+to of Denton
City of Denton 85 4-24 6 685.15 685.15
Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting d gOCJilkntati0n tlu~ul{zutpnva _
I~ a m ats for both 1 aaa and 4885 t6 fnr JARA(ganceled chec
myself. ease refund me 5593.79 for ] attached)
"I hereby apply for the refund of the teove described taxes and certify
that the info ion ave given on !his fora is true and correct."
e o r-Xp-pTf ca on or ax Refund
gna tire
Disapproval
PDroval
OET INATI OR TAX REFUND:
a g a u o u or to cer a e '
gna ure o res ng cer s o ax ng Date
Unit(s1 for refund applications over $500
,I
i
r
:
,
F
Klan
l r
i
r /
i
1
.
WOLFS 7325
109 INO ~y111-N91 I_ / ~l p f'~~
OENiON 7Lij• Gi S14701119
r~,
IIPIST iTA
r.~LL4147421: 1'03 84 aw 73•:5 0000059394 '
j
I
t
+
1„~r
a I
A I Y
~~o
x'
ULU
1 I i, Mkt w ~ ..J
A !
Y.
1
,,A 1 ,
i 1 v l
r5 ~ ~ r ~ d
Nat ' 4,
r
+
1
,F
~fy
I
I
Y
1
1
51111
WOLFF'S;FO'OD } 9 4 9 7
109 WDU am
V 4 VT(i 19 Qy
7 Pay d APRA
$ y
Jot
DOOM
i KIM
RFR9fT iTATE Kw
NO"
1/11
LSi1,19Lk7421: x'03 8848 8u' 9497
00000685 45o' •
n+tirrr
r
C ~ (
I
i
e~
i I
1
I
1
6 '
itY,I ,m1ui ,
Waft
. L .Vr~ .r ~ tJN~~ITi'9 ,•A.
,r . ♦ 1.Y
r
q~
;i
1
f
r
r
.I~t l t.
r I~rt, i~,ti~
wj
r
n. .
+4 ~
7., rs.w u~i'4~8.'~y17r•1,`yn$.l..a,rp~E1L11d ~l~ery. -
k 1
r
11
017Yo/ DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
February 12, 1987
71
3 M L M O R A N D U M
} T'0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
W FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician
THRU: William J. Anderson, Assistant Director of Finance
ar SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund
RECOMMENDATION:
w 'y
Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued.
SUMMARY:
S 4 1
Chapter 31, Section 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code
quires the approval of the governing body of the taxing
rl,~ l re
unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. Taxpayer, Lawyer's
3! ''r Title/W.L. Schenck Jr., has requested a refund in the
rmount of $889.78 for a double payment of City tax account
number 3944-00007.
i, BACKGROUND:
The Mortgage Coa,:eny paid the taxes on December 31,1986
if
and Lawyer's Title also paid of December 31, 1989, Our
records indicate a total of $1739.68 was paid against a
tax base of $869.78. Lawyer's Title is requesting their
refund,
{
FISCAL IMPACT:
d
$860,78 to be refunded.
,
Rer+pect ully_~uby~ . itte
li Y Q
I
dry ~{i ator one er
A 14,
I
ZILNJ,' eebn oian
C I7
psi
n e eon
Assist t Director of Vinance
r/,a7, w.rwrw. +.w+ fi'b
.
~ e I1„ 1
,t p
~'~iwetuaal APPLICATION POR TAX REFUND n~a 4 Tlanf nn -
1 Collecting Office Name. ton Tax Office
ty of Pin
Collecting Tax For (axing units) i
X15 E McK Denton Texas 78201
innev it
Address
City, Stale, Zip Code
for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the taxpayer.
In order to apply
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER:
Name, ' itle/W,L. Schenck Jr.
i Addres s; 1513 W. Oa Denton.exas 7620
Telephone Number (If additional Information Is needed); 588 7087
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: i
DescriptionolProperty: Fnrrnntridge. orrien 1 Block D Lot 7 _
r Addressor Location of Property 14 Tinhnrvrepn Circle
Account Number of Property. 3944-000Q7 or Tax Receipt Number: _
.
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Amount of
Ntme of Taxing Unit Year for
' From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund
Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested
_
y~ ? t.[iY ni penenlgeta - 12 /31-1 1 6 86 : 889.78 _0_
pr+,*y ~i! nnntentOtiA 12131 /10$x. 1X9.78 = 8r3~ti
1 to- 8 _
Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): tlort¢aQe Company paid on 12/31/88
ar a itin also uaid on 12131188. Lawyer's Title is-requesting their
fatlA ~Y L
' I hereby sppiy for the refund of the above-deeeribod taxes and certity that the Infama0on I have given on this form
Is true and correct" A
Olt
signature Date of Application for Tax Refund_ r
r rrrr
..^r rrrwr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rr
j k 017E INATION O TAX REFUND ✓ Approval Disapproval
9lgnaluro of A rued Officer Dale
Slapnaturo of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxi nnqq Dale
k ^ Unigs) for refund applications over S80o
S, Aryl Ww wM n►akeo a bias NrMy oW tM weii mere shah be suypel to ens of HN toMawfne wmow 1, Nnprbe W W $I
" net mere (has 10 yen per toes than ! yen MW/G( a tine of net nice Own 181000 at both wee Iina eni
}4> a., hnOA~ennwnk o, seMnanoM M Jail tar a term up to 1 yosr or a 11M net to -wood 1!,000 or be* weft IIM aM WortaoomM wet
forth in so"" 11.101 Paoli cob.
30 COLLECTIONS:
.'I a:1.-haBa; GU'y,...rv w, .MevPnC /sW`^a d• ~,~yc r I
1
.t -
M
i
aT`... -s t.•K +r rr.:•4.r. • [r'1151NK"NTOK~~
IEMO
3 %VESTO KPX. (P171434-12 I
/ N j ^IE fr ~
{tx ~ vu'~1G'!, TEr.AC7 75201 V AI E -
l...w a1~► d,.~~+l~:ra/~C..1/ l~l+iGk.t76rI L../au rsi'bu 4~..
14 _E fu VON.? 321 F. 11,
1J2 13~i'-`1 ' 41. L. SCF1~.'CK J U I~' S'Ii T 474 G3'AP. ~r
~j
Ail
AT ti I' 0 F,' 1
A S+.w►t,wwk*+~~~~~+869._79._;
Lt7
tllS TtTL I-O► D[riTO N' , ~
V ` ~ ~ tN ADO'-~^~r4 I e`!.. 'T(Ok)NA PE
a' a-'„ R to ,t,
ir~ 3 u' a..o7.w1'C'~ OB697a~''
~wJ t}SaI L r S.. r..
w
F
..Jf w,.. .}j,. .n ii•....• • ~ 494141, DINTON
LAWlf ERS Qrl OF [%NTO ttN.D y~~ s r~A
ro ~f`,~ '
~t,~juF=rrTO~ir?E7.A•~ 7e201 L''l 1. /,Oi
'T J uw IiY bsJ ~ Blsl j tf7,# '
x n.ON1:~
86-D =023I3~'='sl _(02._ w LosomN C F JR L' 1• ,Y7_ _ Ct' t`ORP O +v~~~ O 1
Lt AW
i1ACPA.k7G"_ lt.r,tiiSJ2C vfii~l?O SQ®CFTYT
S 8b9.18_
Wl' IU TITC~D/ DVtTON,
p~OT rj r ~a
f VOI •T!
rAr,C) 0 4"~ ~'000OOf3697A~'
3' 110
. ars low ~ iii ..ter do u .
s
op A
1 N i
w Q
j ~ a
J~ 'j r /r 8
YY ~ it
!f ~
' f
LLEA , 1 y
vA
4
1 ,
•
'YMrnvirn... _ ....y ..m -.r ..rw .'>hsY:ARMYNwwy r........ w•Or. V
f
r. •.a Ala , . WDANK ocNTON
TIdT,.
t-V YERS TIIL~~~OFrIrtDs.~ ~T.~rO~~ : olN~TON
3 W~,*0 1l ' (A 1 7 )4 3 567 r `
r,. , ItiDE~TON;TEXAS7G201~~ -,_i,~~~30/8h
,S uaI d.✓ Yi/ If~'V ri ; ~f / ♦ J U.1 I _
&4- a
86f- 0 3RT ~0l/~~. SNANC~ a ib' e~ls~~ `c~rr~~o e ~ ~~32~101~~.
sew♦~~~~~k*wtk~869. 18
A1W
C.0 cco
N DE Rom
llll Ti7 "O~W~TOII 0 Air Pt 9
~0 3' 111 1•..vr.r~' IrO.d~..4 lit
oo070A6978or.
i
r. r. 1 u . rMI kLay'1 J . q-~ ,.;y I.L ~'•'t yL ,4
WWI"
6YA
WVVkWAVd
60 yr frt9 Fo ,l9, yr ►n
1 r it
j~
f
I
^a
i
,
i
i
i ,
T,..
MAKI CNICNS PAYAKI TO htCXI CITY Or DENTON TAX DI►ARTMINT MAKI C 1'2 PAVAI-i% O;
1
CITY 0► OtNTON TAX DVARTMENT
I
■Y
vs4-oo~ a o
eCNENCK~ \ L jA
' TAR TfU
I, e69.1e
ALTY i
'
too
eos.
~e
Yo(P CANeuiED a•tct ~III~~~~p
Vajk 1NYCtLLtO CMtCK
I! YOIAI PICEIT If YOVR RtCtl►T E
,
PLEASE RETURN TMIS
PLEASE RETURN THIS STU{IVITMPAYMENT
STUD WITH PAYMENTif'
I
I
p
I
• i
• r.,s, ~ YT'C'A.tl'w~74 My}'.Lt 1 i'.sn... •.AifhNVM t$ 4laY,Ii4 AIM!
V
y
Q,4` j
i
01,
1
1 1 I
y• j .1
i4 t. r
9
e t
A b
1
1
1
i
x.
1 1 ~ ~N
'i
' ;wp -Jomaa~Yw'*`-..,
of
"
1
1
J923L ~A
{
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS 'THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
{ FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tatulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary m-terials equip-
went, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, su lies
or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor;
and
I,
WHEREAS, the City Council has go in the City Budget
for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of
the materials,, equipment, supplies or services approved and herein
N
OW
~ NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
xv + +
That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid
Proposals" attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as
being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
DID ITEM
NUR NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
P ~ _ 9)03 .ALI
.9707 far t M M
SaEB!!CA ttax:etQiFe --PA IM
M
Amwat"
S+Z+W.10
81 t1AM -
11 kin
U IYEY Ail CA
.1~ KELSGE 01 L CO. 9 MA M
,.u.p TRl•SEMTRY CH MIr a-"- -
4 ESTES CN MI a: 1S RdS An
a i SECTION I1
That b the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
s
q
weei9 aqk .y ww r,r . r
i ! e 1l i4'~A
.
CONTINUATION SECTION I.
BIO NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
9717 7 VAN MATER A ROGERS 147.50
9718 ALL BEN GRIFFIN TRACTOR _ 329867.00
9723 ALL FUQUA ENTERPRISES 21.200.00-
1,
f
17
ul` r
tt
I
i.
J
l
p, ~ .r 1
J
yr, ' S _ J
4A i
f l
S ,
1
l i St 5 dtWafMaatit sV ww.cwvwen+w /{i11Sw'.YGh+~L k°nlw,. . ,
1 »
r
V .
r~
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
i Proposals, and related documents.
f SECTION III.
That should the City and persons submitting approved and
accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
E formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his
designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the
written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums
contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein
approved and accepted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION Y.
,y That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
M, its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 1,Q_ day of Mareh , 1987.
~e
A # MAYOR
R, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CWtOTTI ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY 0'' DENTON,,TEXAS
' APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE TWO
r
r r 'i~irv.Y.h.WnRer.•s n...~ .a ..,..a a.. Y . IF.IME J<Y'MPn uXa a. ...,a~,~13~ ,yk
J
y
r~
DATE. 3/10/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Bid 19703 Dry Type Transformers
RECOFlIENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated bidder
Spang N,gnetic Power in the total amount of $47,700,00.
a; SUMMARY: i
This bid is for the purchase of 5 dry type transformers to replace
existing PCB Transformers at the Pcwer Pleat.
p
n^`* Px6'~i1NO: Tabulation Sheet
P O , DIPAR71*JITS OR SOPS AFFECTED: Electric Production Pltnt Improvements
1
' f1 ^i Acct. Number #611-008-0251-9210
DSCAL 1;IVACT:
Respectfull submitted:
ry
Lloyd Harrell
City He»bger
P ared bys
Masi i
Tom Shaw
Pities Asat4 Purchtfing Agent
Approved!
` ry~,
x
r AN! ohri shell
110111 Purchasing'Agent is
-;r
,
1
~ub
q,
O T rt 4 ¢r'j
I f I I ~ I I I I 3
10101 19763 1 1IESCP I SEVERAL I UAW I SPRANS I P.P.C, I MARSHALL I MARSHALL I MARSHALL I !
OID TITLE DRY TYPE IRAWEIR EA I I ELECTRIC I MAGNETIC I MAGNETIC I I ANDERSON I ANDERSON I ANDERSON I I
Sows WWI 21111 P.O. I I I POWER 1 PONEA I ! RI 1 02 t IS 1 1
ACCOLIN II 6!1 1118 1231 V211 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I
I I i 1 I i I I I I
...-..-.i•----••••---•I•---........-i.........----i-----------•- 1------------- 1-------------I--•----------i-------------1
' I ,1ply 1 114 iESSF3FtIAN 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDDA I VENDDR I VENDOR I VENDOR
I
l.-. ......................i-...........-I•-•--------.-I--------••---I...-....----•I-------------1-------------I-••-------••-i-----•-------I------------•I
y L. 3 I I I I I I I I 1 1
126611.99 IAANSPD~WR 1 23,523,61 1 331515.11 1 22,367.11 I 15,711.11 1 21,451.11 1 27,111,11 1 2717m.ll I 211,16t.H I I
r; I++ I I I ! I I I I I I
I 4 119 kVA IWUOAMER I 17,254./6 t 11,832.11 I 11,111.11 1 8,111.11 I 11,009,11 t 14,213.11 I 14,163.11 I 14,913.11 f I
I: ' I I I t I I 1 ! 1
t° •I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1
1 ! DELIVERY 1 15-21 NITS 1 B MONTHS I 41 DAY I 91 DAY I 8 Y15 I 1 1 I I
I I f ! I 1 t I I I I I
, I I t I 1 I I I I I t
~ c l1 I 3 r I t I I I f !
I r I t I I I i I I I I
k~
Y.
~Y
s,
,
it • r
y~
r~._ __..,_.n•..,+..w.rw.w~w..+.•-........._ _ _._.~-.w+.w..wcwo~.~..•~YwN.Y,NM.u..~~ywwYK~MY,www~WYM'Mnyw.a.....r
~4 .
1 t
, t
t .
yr, e
,t+
1 1"4
a:.:
vn.
J
r
DATE:
3/10/87
" I'll COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Countil
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Bid 1 9707 Motor Drive for Forced Draft Fao
J RECOMgERDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated bidder of
Shermco Industries 11 in the amount of $24,185.00 including the frame adapter
f deduct.
r r; ~7
SUMMARY* This bid is for the replacement of an 800 horsepower motor for unit 15
at the Power Plant,
The bid of General Electric Is
lower
how
motor bid offered by Shermco will ever their motor is less efficient. The
1 save $3732,00 per year in operatin cost.
1i a! Tabulation Sheet
~J ~RiDGRAlLS. DEPART1iE117s OR 6RDUP5 AFFECTED:
Electric Production Department
M r 11'. y I
.I I
IMPACT: 1986/8T Budget Funds Acct. 1611-008-0251-9204
sr Respettfu submitted:
0 +h yt.
~F rr~j}i
Lloyd Harrell
City Manager.
Pr pared by:
New*: Toro Shaw
Titles Aset. Purchasing Agent
Approveds
a I
az^ : rahall
titlPurchasiea Agent
s i
zJ
t,
~G r
f
1.
pply ^ r
't ' 1 , 4 ds, 1. . r ° ~yA r '~i{> +Y yh 41
.',„e}~~y~a~,.~r. tgxE b`~ (T.''4 ~j) g t s:5 fie! d~ y:'s• a~, a1 ~4tyv.
r r..
y
i ! I 1 1 I I
>11d I~ 1 4)01 I R 11 I EENEfAI 1 RELIANCE I SHIM I MICHAEL I SHERNED I I
AID i11Lf. ELEiiNlt Hni0~ I @EAAINS I ELELtRIC I ELECIRIC I INDUSIRIES I D. CASE► i INPUSIRIES i I
OPENED '215@} 7100 '.b. I 5 SUPPLY I I I I Ih;. ! ! !
r;;,' ACCOhllil 61l•r'~@-P251•t:0a I I t it I I i2 I I
t I ! 1 I I I
r
,e ..............•-.........-.....-..I•° I...-......--•-I.........•...I............. 1........... 1 I .........1
,g 1 l;' Off I ITEM PC5CR(F1109 I VENDOR I VESDA I VEKJM I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR S
.'4a_ ....I I...• .....................I...•-........I....-...-----I--•-....-•---1.............1-............i.- .-....----l-------------1
" 1 I 1 I ' 1 I 1
i '
I t IIg1fOR DRIVE FOR FORCED I 28,319,40 1 21,252.00 I 31,b19.10 I 2B.IT3.11 1 9,821.11 I 21,811.11 1 I
+r 1V !IAN ELECISIC WOR I I 3 I l i I I
,'`I~ la~aalrelo~ I I ! 1 #3,@@0.11 I I I I
( i i I I 1 21.105.111 1 1 !
I ( dal(rary 1 11-16 M1 t 25 wk I I10 1 12b day 1 133 day 1 90 day I 1
~ ! I I I I I i 1
i I 641 1 U.S. ELEC I I I TOSHIBA I SIEMENS I V.S. ELEC I I
i; 1 1 1 I ! I I I 1
~i . .I' f 1 I I I f I 1
j I I I I I Idaduct if I !
f 1 I I ! IFraaf adtiltrl I I !
w I t ! I I riot noaded i I I !
~ : ~ ~ f I ( 1 o/!P Inili E 1 I 1
1 ( I I I 1n-souau 1 I I
( I i 1 I 1 I I
~I 1 I I 1 t 1 I 1
F`, 'j I I I I r i I I
r
r
Y(
i
r
4, ! DATE. 3/10/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
~t
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
G
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT; Hid 9 9711 Oils & Greases
Y v
z3 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Mid-America Corporation of
a
Bedford, Texas. They are the overall low bidder for all items except items
a 9606a,11 a 12. We recommend items 9 6,6a be awarded to the low bidder of
Ben Ivey 0116 Co., and items 911 & 12 be awarded to Kelsoe Oil Co.
u
SUMMARY: This bid is for the oils & greases as needed for the next year. This
can be extended for one additional year at the same prices etc. with approval
y by both parties. The bid was sent from our vendor file to some 15 suppliers.
We received seven bids, one was for only a few items, and the others for most
•v ,
items. We received only one complete bid on all items and it was the lowest &
beet except for four items.
i
BACUROINID'
S^ i .
Tabulation sheet
PR CROUPS AFFECTED: Service & maintenance of all vehicles
MAW KPARTMEf1TS OR
and equipment.
f' F r,' FISCAL I PACU There it no additional impact on the General fund.
Acct. M 710-025-0580-8702
,
Respeetfu ly submitted;
jFPPPPP M1 Y i r,
L n Harrel
City nager
Prepared by,
Marahall
1tle. purchasing Agent
Approved:
= o f8 hall
if Etit: rchasing Agent
SAO. 1h, '.M.w. ieJN~: rPk
"T*..
W
bra.
,t~R •
e
1 @
I }f
14
OPP "Mm'.
1 I I I I I i 1 I
@II) 4 4711 I GULF OIL I IELSH OIL 1 CAFUINERS I PEN IVEY I PENNZOIL 1 DENTE4 I MID-ANERICA I i
BID Tim OILS l MAO 1 NCMANA'r 1 (0. 1 OIL (0. I OIL ED. I IRDOUCTS I FORD I CORPORATION 1 1
DrIE D 21kiT@7 2t B9 P.K. i I 1 I I CO. 1 I i !
ACCOUNII 711 125 PSnB 8712 ! i I I I I I I 1
I I I I I I I S I ,
1-----•-••••- - - I_.....___....I............. I-_____._-._._I
S 1 t
4( QTY "I IimmulailON I VENDOR t VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR t VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
1 SS DAL IANTINN 111'DRRULIC OIL 1 2,24 1 7.35 1 1.% 1 1.98 1 2.15 1 4.69 1 1.29 1 1
' .2. '.1 SS 4AL` IDEIFON TI AiF 1.21141 1 3.18 1 2,14 1 7.67 1 2.46 1 2.75 1 1 1.99 1 1
24; `f 2{ O1 *EIR04 11 AIF D-21141 1 1.87 1 1.9$ 1 1.95 1 1.73 1 1.61 1 1 1.67 t I
3.;':1 SS DAL IFLEEI AMR OIL IS-41 SFCI 2.00 1 2.75 1 2.55 1 2.43 1 2.85 1 4.63 1 2.15 1 I
3A. 1 '24 01 IFLEET 1101-3 OIL 15.41 SKI 1.17 1 1.83 1 1.81 1 1.71 1 1.95 1 1.35 1 1.67 1 t
4.,. 153 DAL' 1T bbg IOD11RANY Fall 1 2.91 1 61.61 1 1.66 1 2.47 1 2.81 1 4.69 1 2.19 1 I
' 4A.S SAL IIAV16R 0/1PANS FLUID 1 3.53 1 3.11 1 3.33 1 2.91 1 3.61 1 6.26 1 2.43 1 1
61: ! ; 2 DAL IIRACTQR wDi1RA14S FLUID I MA I NA 1 MA 1 2.95 1 7.26 1 4.42 1 2.44 1 I
4C; ;1 0t IT WOR IIYOMANS FLUID I NA I MA 1 NA I NA 1 NA 1 1 1.69 1 i
3. ,1 SS DAL ITYPk F T,PANS FLUID 1 2.96 1 2.74 1 2.36 1 2.31 l 2.75 1 1 1.99 I I
SA: ;24 11 1117E F TARNS FLUI1 1 1.11 1 1.10 1 1.70 1 1.11 1 0.61 1 I 1.61 I I
6..;,1 55 6AL IPW STORM FLUID 1 NA 1 2174 1 NA 1 2.46 1 NA 1 4.69 1 3.51 1 t
6A.'1 74 0 AM STFERIND FLUID 1 NA. 1 1.93 1 NA 1 11.73 1 1.98 1 1 1.41 1 I
7. 1 5! M i HYDAAULIL,DIL NON-CON 1 2124 1 2.61 1 7.35 1 2.66 1 3.31 1 1 1.14 1 1
8. 55 BAC IiAE 114 00100 CIL 1 2.711 1 2.N 1 2.21 1 2.41 1 2.11 1 1 2116 1 1
1A:'1 24 91 1W 10 N0 1A OIL I 1.70 I NA 1 1.12 1 1.23 1 1.81 1 t 1.61 f 1
0. 4 SD k WE N VOT(+B OIL t 3.18 E 2.95 1 2.56 1 2.47 1 2.21 1 1 2.24 1 I
9#' 1 24 41 ISLE. N 116IOo CIL 1 NA 1 NA 1 1.12 1 1.73 1 1181 1 1 1.69 1 t
11,.1 SS DAL (404, 114 DEAR LUFE 1 3.15 1 2.11 1 216 t 3.39 1 4.22 1 1 2.66 1 I
11[1 100 INNEEL RAW$ GREASE 14011 1.74 1 1.15 1 1.90 1 1.12 1 1.64 1 1129 1 1.31 1 1
12. 1 101E9 16EAR ITIASE 14 01 1 1.76 1 1.15 1 139 1 1.01 1 1.96 1 1 1.13 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1
1 I TOTALS 1 $3.57 1 35.00 I 31.02 1 31.21 1 43.5) 1 )1.11 1 34.61 1 i
I 1 EVALUATED TOTALS 1 41.65 1 39.73 1 39.11 I $1.91 1 1 POT COM 1 34.61 1 1
I I I I I I I 1 I 1
i i 1 I I I t i k I I
1
•
DATE: March 10, 1987
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
e
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
d
SUBJECT: BIDI 9717 - HERBICIDES
RECOMNEHDATIOM: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
r of each item:
TRI-SENTRY CHEMICAL ITEMS 2, 5, 6 in the amount of $ 968.73
ESTES CHEMICAL ITEMS 1, 3, 4 in the amount of 15,545.00
VAN WATER S ROGERS ITEM 7 in the amount of 147.50
TOTAL BID AWARD $16,661.23
SUMMARY: This bid is for the annual estimated usage of her-
bicides. required by the PArks Department for the maintenance of park
areas.
` Tabulation Sheet
SACkGRQIIRO
r'd P!l~4RAtB. KPARTWTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
~i •d
rfJ,, Parks and Recreation Department
FISCAL IMPACT:
1986/87 Budget Funds Account M 100-031-0064-8105
".3 Respectfull submitted:
Lloyd W Harrell
City Mansyer,
,d• Prepared by-.
Mama: Tony D. Shaw
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
a x ! Approved:
r
ry e, F. _ Marshall, C,P.M$
itic -Purchasing Agent
n
fit.N:V,...re. .o-. .'_r.Y„a.a7f ehi'.„w a'»w... nxg0.Yq »yI
,
i
J
r
y tt t
CF
l ,
r I I 1 1 1 1
BIQ 1: 197!7 I tRl l ESiDS t LESCO I CHEMIEAL I VAN-NATERS I TRITON I HARPOOL 1
Bit 1[lLt HER0IC110 1 SENTRY I CHEMICALS I INC. 16 TURF I i ROWS i MFB. EORF. t SEED i
OFENE6 2119167 2;81 P.M. I CHEMICALS I I I SPECIALISTS I I I INC. I
ACE mill
IP8 IS! 1164 8185 I I I I 1 I I I
! t 1 t I 1
.....................1...--•---•--•I------•------I----..-..._.-I-----........I.....--------I•--..........-----•-•-----I
1 .I GTY I ITEM DESEW1184 I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOA I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
..:.1--------- --------------------------1-------------1--•-•--------I---.........-I - - - - - - - - - - - - - l--.......-..-1........-...-I-.....6------I
' I i I I I 1 I I 1
'1. 11 151 IROUNV 38 DAL [RUM 1 59.11 1 37.81 1 61.11 1 61.71 1 58.11 1 M18 1 11931.11 1
sA ` I ! ! ! I 1 I 1 t
} 2. ' 25 1ROUNDUP PUARIS t 19.35 t 21.13 1 1 27.26 1 28.11 1 1 27.18 1
3. 1 16 1OUSt 48 DI. 1 342.54 1 333.51 ! i 355.71 1 361.11 1 1 I
I t' t I ! i 1
31 ISLUAfN A3 I 6AL 1 61.75 1 51.31 1 $8.41 1 53.95 1 53.53 1 1 71.1N 1
Ft' I l' 1 I t 1 I I 3 1
31 IMSMA SIATACtANI 1 11.16 1 11.74 1 1 11.75 1 12151 1 1 11.33 1
r1a' i t 1 i I I I r
' 01 1 6 ISUPER TA1MEt 1 BAT, 1 31.53 1 ! I 34.35 1 I I 11.43 I
~y, di Lt, I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1
7 11 ISEIUESTRINF 331 SLI 1 16.71 1 IM3 1 17.95 1 19.55 1 14.15 1 1 20.33 1
~1J1,., 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I I t
.,Ti I t I t I I I 1
1+ 1,) ! I 1 5 DAYS I 1 I J DAYS 1' 13 DAYS
~:.;tt 1 1 'r r 1 1 1 1 1
s
i 1
1
1
~ b ^WOirv.w`q.'1~Aii1MR.MM#'/#WaMWV+'•^
6 ~
1
Nllp
ry
~1'v h 1.
1
DATE:
3/10/d7
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Bid /9718 Tractor Mover Combination
G
RECOIMDATIOM: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid meeting
" specification of Ben Griffin Tractor in the amount of $32,867.00.
k 1
4
sIlWARY: This bid is for the purchase of a Tractor and Mower combination? To be
utilized by the Park Department in the moving of road sides
parks and right of
way. The lower trice offered by Colonial Motors is for a smaller Turf type
tractor and mover.
4 The air conditioned cab opinion will not be accepted.
r t Tabulation Sheet
►ROSiRAilS. DEPARTIi#llTs OA GROUPS AFFECTED:
Park maintenance and motor pool
~f13CAt lMPACT' This unit will be funded from the lease/purchase agreement
approved by council 12116186.
5
Respectfull submitted:
Lloyd Y. arrel l
City Manager,
Prepared by: 1
x t' r Naeia: Tom 8WV
Title: Asst. Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Isw s+ r♦I,.
n
biarehall
ftlR: Purchasing Agent
M 44,
%
.1
f
i i I ! I I I
A 810 1:. 14111 f COLONIAL I EEN I IIMME PER I CHEM114L I ORISON 1 A SEASONS 1 DOLOMITES I
BID TITLE IRACIERIMONER Comm I MOTORS I FRIFFIN 1 TUEDTA I I TURF ID157RIOUTING 1 MACHINERY I OF TELAS I
DPENED 21'&1181 240 B.M. I CO. I FORD I l EOUIFMENT I SFEEIAL11Y I CO. 1 7 SUFFLY 1 1
ACCOAlI LEASE WWI I ! TRACIUR I 3R1. I CO. I I I i
I I CO. 1 I i I I i
I-__.---------I-•...........I.............I............-i-............I....---------I.............i
1 1. 01Y I ITEM DESCRU'llON I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
- t- I°•---..-. ...............I-----•------•1-------••----1-------------I-----•-------I•....•-------I-----------•-1.............I
-I, r I i I I 1 I 1 I
i( I 1 I I I I 1 I 1
I IFLAI°L NOW COMBO NI 1 NO all 1 19,140.81 1 NO BID I NO III 1 NO BIB I NO BIB I NO BID I
T' 11N51ALL0I04 OF ITEM 2` 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
! I;' I I i i i I I I -
2. I' 1 00 R.P. TRACTOR I I 131669.11 I I I I I I
' i' r I I I I I
I ICOM80 OF 1 1 2 1 311911.11 1 321061.11 1 1 1 1 1 1
It ° i l 1141R CDNDI I IONER 1 41181.11 1 41226.11 1 I I 1 I 1
i 1 I 1 1 l I 1
k' { I I 31-61 1 I 1 1 1 1
' I' 1 1 I 31-68 1 I I i 1 1
1 IDELIVERY 1 31 1 00-k81 1 1 t I 1 I
.1 f II f I I ! !
1, I I I i I I i k I
I 31, Fla TENDED NARRANIY 1 1 475.14 1 1 1 k 1 1
i 1 I I I 1 1 I I I
! I I AUERNAIE 1 1 I 1 I 1 I
I, I I I I ! I I ! 1
k. I { t I I 1 I I i
._.,..,....:.............n,......o......._..._.. ....~..........M...reMie+.wllu.rr+.rww.Y^...~......~.......~-......sw..o..---
tit
.
e
ff
ti ~AY yl
s~x •
DATE: 3/10/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT., B14 19723 Refuse Containers
4
RECOMiiEN0ATI0M: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder,
l Fuqua Enterprises in the amount of $212.00 each. Total bid $21,200,00.
f
~s
" SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of 100 pieces of 3 cubic yard refuse containers
Eti for use by the commercial refuse collection department. These containers will be
yy for new customers as well as replacement containers for existing installations.
aACK6R0UM0: Tabulation Sheet
Ywl "t Y PO MIS, OEPARTIiENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Solid waste Dept.
4 qt tt °
FISCAL IMPACT: 1986/87 Budget Fluids Account number 630-024-0802-9106
Capital expenditure machinery and equipment
Respectfu submitted:
Lloyd , Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
w f ~ ti
Name: Tom BhaV
a 1 Title! Aeat. Purchasing Ageat
,k
Approved:
s`
W l a Marshall
Tit1j; Purchasing Agcnt
u
d
WWI,
1
I I I I t I
PID - 1 9723 1 FUQUA I SE'Dil 1 I INDUSIRIAL I ENCD I i
DID 111LE REFUSE EDNIAINERS I ENTERPIRSES t NRL I DISPOSAL I INDUSTRIES I 1
OPENED 2121!81 2111 PM, I IN[. I S1EEL I SUFFLY f X. I I
ACCOUNII 638-121-Bof12-9108 I l I i I I
1 t I I ORND
•+.......a•• t. -Ia • - -1 1
I 1-' IIY I` HEM CISCRIPTION I VEND014 t VENDOR I WHOM I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I
! 1--•----a°--- I-...-•-•---•al-------------t-----------•-I
t I I F I I 1
I. I' 141 11 EUSIC YAPD CONTAINERS 1 212.11 1 221.41 1 26"1 1 216.51 1 1
s
1 ' I I I I 1 I 1
i i I I I I 1
R' I dtllmy 1 31-64 DAY 1 45 DAY 1 11.20 DAY 1 31-45 DAY I 1
1, 1 I I 1 t I 1
i. I 1 I 1 I 1
1 I I I I 1 I t
t,, I I t I 1
1 1 3 I I I I 1
1.; t i 1 t I 1
.~.___._---•+w•wr+a rrrrrwr.r,r-....... ..__....~,...,ar.. w..,.n.....w„a.... ...~.•~.~w«~wr..u.....-.....
A
&a A
tl
F
r ♦
0923L
NO.
f
I AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE,
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOP. PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING ~
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
r competitive bids for the construction of public works or
improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and
City ordinances; and
,i
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
received and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals ,
and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the following competitive bids for the construction of
public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita-
tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached
E hereto are hereby, accepted and approved as being the lowest
responsible bids:
t
BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
9713 gTAI on rrvtorurr l ccQU1(cs S1A t.ne
SECTION II.
That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive
bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the
person submitting the bid for construction of such public works
or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person
shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to
. Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and
r~
t
1
v,
Y
e
r furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification
of the award of the bid.
SECTION III.
' That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all
necessary written contracts for the performance of the
x. construction of the public works or improvements in accordance
with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such
w.' contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and
Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the
terms, conditions, plans and specifications,, standards,
quantities and specified sums contained therein.
r "
SECTION IV.
That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive
k„ 5 bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and
improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby
• authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
a-oust as specified in such approved bids and authorized
wntracts executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 10 day of MARCH , 1947,
wg
" CITY OF DENTONr TEXAS
' ATTEST:
CHXRLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYs
4
PAGE TWO
` ~ r,„..».«.«.y, - . ........w .wwr,; .xyN,u,... .xe,.,a.!+w,t
qtr b
i
DATE: March 10, 1987
i
CITY COUNCIL REPORT.
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
' SUBJECT: 8101 9713 - ASBESTOS REMOVAL
RECOIMNOATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specifications, Standard Environnental Services in the amount of
$10,821.00.
SUAMIIRY: This bid is for the removal and disposal of asbestos
141
" contaminated materials under Unit 1, 2, and 3 furnance areas at the Power 4
Plant.
eWy`
~,;y ~ j y! v
Os Tabulation Sheet
tSj
OEPARTNEIfTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Y, Electric Production Maintenance
ILI
1986/87 Budget Funds Account 1610-080-0251-8339
R,spectf subm tto :
Lloyd V.
Harrell
;I
.i.;; City Manager
,v Pr~^a red by:
Y~
M y
Nemec Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
N
9 ,
n Marshall, C.P,M,
µr, tlot Purchasing Agent
x .x, vaio. n.aN.•+~wkDnsarv.. q
s wtyi ~ ~e
r~
r.; 1
wa:
[~i '✓r , 4 ..k a
t '
[ I I E 1 I I
ilb 1 _ 19713 1 THERMO- I SIANDARD I ARMIEL- t SUNBELT I {
IID 111L. PSBE5105 REMOVAL I TECH 1ENVIRUNMENIALI 11AODELL IEONSiFOC10AS I i
DINED. 2111187 28Qi P.M. I I SERVIEE I INC. I INC. I 1
AC4WIi1 614.164 1151.8311 1 I 1 t I I
1 l 1 I I
. ..................1..........__•I_.._.........i.........---•I_-_..........1.............j
F' 1 I QTY I ITEM DESCRIFUCA ! VENDOR I VENDOR i VENDDA I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I
F .._._j 1-----_-------I............. 1............. 1.........._._{
1 I I I I I I S ~
1. 1 LOT ;REMOVAL OF A68FS7DS 1 111793.11 1 11,821,88 1 18,835.14 1 17,851.48 1 !
w, 1 IN41FRIAL UNIT It 2, 3 1 1 I I I 1
~ ► I I ! l I I !
`t I I I I I I I
I S I t t I 1
1: 3 1 1 I 1
1 I I I
ra 1 I j .I I t 1
, r ! 1 1 1 I I 1
1 1 1 I i 1
I I 1 t I 1 r t
t 1 I I I I 1 I•
I ' I 1 I I t I t i
4}
r
61
T f' '
vk
t ~
% Ti
1 ~ 11689L
NO
l
t' AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING A SCHOOL SAFETY SPEED
ZONE ON WOOD STREET 300 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH DAVIS
STREET; RUDDELL STREET 300 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH
DAVIS STREET; DAVIS STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH WOOD STREET
TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH RUDDELL STREET; REDUCING THE MAXIMUM
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT FOR SUCH PORTIONS OF SAID STREETS FROM
THIRTY (30) TO TWENTY (20) MILES PER HOUR DURING CERTAIN HOURS;
PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS
($200.00); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
a THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
y,
SECTION i.
yt Based upon an engineering and traffic investigation hereto-
fore made as authorized by the provisions of Section 169, Article
6701d, V.T.C.S., the prima facie speed limit of twenty (20) miles
per hour for vehicles is hereby determined and declared to be
n prima facie reasonable and safe, and such speed limit is hereby
fixed for vehicles traveling upon the following named streets and
} highways, or parts thereof during the hereinafter designated
hours. The location of said school zones and the hours during
which said speed zones shall be in effect are as follows to-wits
;(4- - Location Extent Hours In Effect
A. Ott Wood Beginning at the intersection 7:30 a.m.-9:00 p.m.
Street of Wood with Davis Street and 3:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m,
3 ' ending 300 feet north of its
intersection with Davis Street.
B. On Ruddell Beginning at its intersection 7:30 a,m,-9:00 p.m,
Street with Davis Street and ending 3:00 p,m.-4:00 p.m.
i 300 feet north of Its inter-
section with Davis Street.
C, On Davis Beginning at its intersection 7:30 a,m.-900 p,m.
P.M.-4:00 P.M.
a' Street with Wood Street and ending 3.00
at its intersection with
Ruddell Street.
` SECTION II.
` An individual adjudged guilty of exceeding this speed limit
1 when signs are erected giving notice thereof, shall be guilty 01
a misdemeanor, and punished Dy a fine not to exceed Two Hundred
Dollars ($200,40)4
4 J{
r
T,
' ljy YY.}..F>.N!aq Wxkw.ere.... .:.....»laN.ihY n>a~al..,. .,-.,,,..a • +rs
4,•;
,tit..
r.
k
f SECTION
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause,
phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
person or circumstance is held invalid b any court of competent
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such
y`. E remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
~r
SECTION IV.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
y; from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City' of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of
its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1997.
t i
9 AY T THEN YO
t CITY OF DENTaN, TEXAS
i ATTEST:
3ENNIFIR
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
ia: DBORA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
L,
4
kb . , SYt
PAGE Two
a
x= „
Kr
i
i
I
vie
017Y of D/NTON 1215 E, McKinney / Donlon, Texas 76201
( MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 24, 1986
c TO: CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFE1Y SUPPORT COMMISSION
FROM., Paul Iwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer Associate
SUBJECT: School toning for the Sullivan Keller
Jefferson Davis Elementary School has been renamed to Sullivan
Keller. The staff recommends school toning as follows:
' School speed limit signs;
as On Wood Street, at southeast corner of Wood and Davis
b. On Wood Street, 300 ft. north of Davis, west side
G c. On Ruddell street, at property corner on the
T•intersection of Davis and Ruddell, east side
` d. On Ruddell Street, 300 ft. north of Davis, west side
{ ea On Davis, at southwest corner of Wood and Davis
Crosswalks:
ea At south neck of Davis ! Wood
b. At east neck of Davis 1 Wood
c. At west neck of Davis ! Ruddell
Notet Crosswalks shall be 10 ft. wide.
School crossing signs:
a. School crossing signs shall be posted at every crosswalk
except where there is a stop sign
Advance warning signs for school crossing:
3~.
as Advance warning signs shall be posted 150 ft. (min.) to
700 ft. before crosswalks
Normal speed limit signs:
,t as 30 mph speed limit signs shall be posted at the end of
school :ones (all approaches)
0420E
F•
.,y yA Tl
~"d S
c'
' page 3 of 10 pages
ITEM 03 SCHOOL ZONE FOR SULLIVAN KELLER:
Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said there
was no ordinance or record to support school zone
signs at Sullivan Keller. He recommended the
following:
Sullivan Keller will be zoned as follows:
School speed limit signs:
a. On Wood Street, at southeast corner of Wood and
Davis
b. On Wood Street, 300 ft. north of Davis, west side
c. On Ruddell street, at property corner on the
T-intersection of Davis grid Ruddell, east side
d. On Ruddell Street, 300 ft. north of Davis, west
side
e. On Davis, at southwest corner of Wood and Davis
Crosswalks:
a. At south neck of Davis I Wood
f b. At east neck of Davis I Wood
c, At west neck of Davis I Ruddell
kz Note. Crosswalks shall be 10 ft. wide,
School crossing signs:
a. School crossing signs shall be posted at every
crosswalk except where there is a stop sign
Advance warning signs for school crossing:
I a. Advance warning signs shall be
(min.) to 700 ft. before crosswalks osted l50 ft.
Normal speed limit signs:
Ar i .
a. 30 mph speed limit signs shall be posted at the
c'r A end of school zones (all approaches)
Gilbert Bernstein asked if there were any major
changes. Paul said resume speed signs, additional
for rosswalksaln Wood street, 2nd advance warning signs
} d c
' STAFF RECOMMENDEDr Approval
COMMISSIONERS: Virginia Gallian made a notion to accept
the staff recommendation. Mike Amadore
yr seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously.
ti
w ,
I
WOW"
t d, 7 R28 7 1 j dp~'O
27
9 •S 9 +
3
r
t 14,
iC8 10 'A r25
10 11
, '0
12 R R 3 r,
13 4 22 13 R *9 KFY
Ise
14 i x NO MKINS 900 TO 4:00
f
21 14 'R p1No9sTRUN X- ["4
• sc oot Wool SIGN _
4;. R R 20 N 15 F On R9jVML NORMAL SKID ,
i 16 R R ' ' 16 ~i
1 17 g n 18 17 20
:,I gn 22 R 7 A
D vie ~
reo ~w~i' r4x~: '
'R I 2T
3 d ~t
'R 26 R 2 4eo
2
09 25
w1 R 4 •9 24 'R. ' 4 g 2
R, R 2 S A. ~ 6 F
R
so ao'
} a . 6 22 .R DAV s
'd 13' 14-P %
7 3 'R 21 _ 7 I eo'
8 R ?n 4 R
9 ,
19 I~ 9 R R
.
I in .91 A 18 ~R 10 'R
III ; -7
ti
w
1696L
t
NO.
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING SPEED ZONES FOR EAST
AND WEST BOUND TRAFFIC ON U.S. HIGHWAY 380 FROM ITS INTERSECTION
WITH INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SS TO WESTERN CITY LIMITS FOR A DISTANCE
OF 2.592 MILES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 83-03; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200,00);
` PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1, Based upon an engineering and traffic investiga-
tion heretofore made as authorized by the provisions of Section
169, Article 6701d, V.T,C.S., the prima facie speed limit for
east and west bound traffic on U. S. Highway 380 is hereby deter-
mined and declared to be prima facie reasonable and safe, and
such speed limit is hereby fixed for vehicles traveling upon the
t&{ following named highway, or parts thereof. The location of said
school zone and the hours dut ing which said speed zone shall be
in effect are as follows to-wit:
3 i
I Location Extont Speed Limit
A. On U, S. From its intersection with Inter- 4S MPH
+ Highway 380 state Highway 3SE to a point 200
feet east of Marshall Road.
1 8, On U. S. From 200 feet east of Marshall so MPH
Highway 380 Road to approximately 400 feet
vr. west of Cindy Lane.
_4 11 C, On U. S. From 400 feet west of Cindy Lane SS MPH
a Highway 380 to the western City limits.
D, On U, S. Beginning 730 feet west of the 3S MPH*
Highway 380 Santa Fe Railroad crossing coin
west for a total distance of so
s: feet.
*The maximum speed limit of 35 miles per hour is designated when
' school is in session between the hours of 7130-9:00 a.m, and
2130.4:00 p.m.
SECTION II, An individual adjudged guilty of exceeding this
epee limit, wen signs ■re erected giving notice thereof, shall
j
h, a
~y
I
Y'l~t: 1.L L ul-
i
;z
i
j be guilty of a misdemeanor, and punished by a fine not to exceed `
Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00).
d ' a
SECTION III, That if any section, subsection
Y , , paragraph, r
I. sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application
r: ! thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court
of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City
Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would
have enactcu such remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
}
t SECTION IV. That Ordinance No. 83-03 is hereby repealed.
' SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen
(14 ays rom the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
M published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of
the date of its passage.
" PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987.
h
RAY 1 , MAYOR
f CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
'i
MWIFVR WATERS
Yy; ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
` DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
s' BY s
-
j PAGE TWO
y-
.w «..w... .:..!a.+u ta,.n=Bk+n ,l r.,-.»,..... .,aa.y _
' I
F.
k`
D'/
F Y~
r
city of DEWON im E. McKinney! Denton, Texas 76201
i
t, MEMORANDUM r
s. DATE: November 24, 1986
± TO., CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION
FROM; Paul Iwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer Associate
SUBJECT= School zoning for the Selwyn School
Y.1 The State Department of Highway and Public Transportation has
re-zoned SH 380 for speed from 13S to west city limits, Three
speed zones are identified and include a school zone definition
for the Selwyn Schools
f-,
a1 a '
` 4S mph from I35 to the point 200 ft. east of Marshall
Rd r, both directions. this portion includes a 35 mph
$00 ft. long school zone for the Selwyn School.
Total length is O.SS miles.
b, 50 mph from the point 200 ft, east of Marshall to the
point 400 ft. west of Cindy Lane both directions.
This distance is 0.30 miles.
Cs SS mph from the point 400 ft. west of Cindy Lane to
Denton west city limits, both directions, This
distance is 2.592 miles.
These speed limits were set based on analysis' of roadway
conditions, accident records, and prevailing speed of prudent
1 . drivers.
M +Staff agrees with this speed zoning and, therefore, recommends
j approval.
0429E
r
Ai
~t
ie '
YYk A.
t 1
Y Vii'
Minutes - December 1, 1986 page 4 of 10 pages 4
Citizens Traffic Safety Support Comm
{ ITEM 14 SCHOOL 20NING FOR THE SELWYN SCHOOL AND SPEED ZONING
Or an 0 FROM ITY =1 S:
Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said there
was no record of an ordinance pertaining to the
school speed zoning for the Selwyn School and speed
zoning of SH 380.
Paul said the State Department of Highway and Public
Transportation has re-zoned SH 380 for speed from 135
to west city limits. Three speed zones were
identified and include a school zone definition for
z the Selwyn School:
1 a. 45 mph from 13S to the point 200 ft. east of
Marshall Rd., both directions. This portion
r~„ { includes a 35 mph 800 ft, long school zone for
t1 the Selwyn School. Total length is O.SS miles.
y, b. 50 mph from the point 200 ft. east of Marshall to
the point 400 ft. (rest of Cindy Lane, both
directions. This distance is 0.30 miles.
i c. 55 m h from the point 400 ft. west of Cindy Lane
` to Denton west city limits, both directions.
This distance is 2.592 miles.
` These speed limits were set based on analysis of
roadway conditions, accident records, and prevailing
kF w speed of prudent drivers.
Gilbert Bernstein asked if there were any major
changes. Paul said the school zone was about 2700
feet before and that was reduced to 800 feet.
3 Gilbert asked,if Selwyn agreed with the change. Paul
ra ` said they did.
w STAFF RECOMMENDED: Approval
COMMISSIONERS; Bruce Chamberlain made a motion to accept
the staff's recommendation. Virginia
Gillian seconded the motion. Motion
passed unanimously.
ITEM NS REQUEST FOR 4-WAY STOP ON WILLOWWOOD AT MCCORMICK:
r Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said this
was the first step in proper bicycle route
installation on Willowwood.
r ? The intersection poses many problems.
1. Vehicular traffic movement on Willowwood is more
than 30 MPH.
M
y♦ ~
v f
1 , t
' ..._..o..,,•.°._v...::-eam-y.~, ~yyi»11}~4Ng°~WrXr:.,s ry,y. a: sPC'k a+S~.A7Nl ~!3:1i'* ' '~ak';id~~~,
n'
F4
Y
iL ~ R f
0 II
E
" j 4Y 4
gg
nN rfrrp r11rr ~ ® ,
,.,4 Z Irlr rlrrrl r
yL 4 4
1
YYY,
'IOF •
f
' 1 f Mil rIM►N WMr
t
a.l (
~ NN Y►11
~s
(
i
r .y
cT, sir ' * . t 1 Odd
r
' n , W ♦ 411 t. i. .
~ w.' ..w ; ;n,s R ~~Y t Y F'. l~+lbl ,y ~ ~k.k.~ R ,y;' ~ ~ i I
~ tEM1~w. .c~.V.~. Ir W., Y.uKRMY. Y,~4.:yUp+..tlVV.•+♦.~~~-[ •w . w_MM W{
.~ryj~ih a .F
1Nw 'o
Pit"1
n 4
}
ES S:GIiTI9 ANCE ;
e-LL BANK or ADVISORY SPEED
RV LOVER p)d3l
F' GRADES OVER . 3 % r
$t;R. WIDTIi -NO TYPE-_-
& ; A 0 rJ. -.►:Q fi `cID. WIDTH xs
AAT ENTS N
:E LEfcG1HS M_LE
ZC'~E LtECS MPH -
r r.
TOW. -D
WISE CO. LINE
IIJ
500+001
+ 460+00
} D
A DENTON
j • • Y
L F!
C, ~•,c5
L •~~r~aY SPEED ----T---
".rE5 DISTANCE
;E JELOPMENT
18 COUNTY • UE N T 0 N hua ho a+Tc
GIST. NO. ~tr:ut! ~ o.it
HIGHWAYUS. 380 CITY DENTON .cr;scto of out
eat er lulvtr . 10-88 ssAU `~i 500 cAha:to er oATt
LIMITS. ZONE
SECTION 0%E LENGTH MILES SECTION TWO LENGTH MILES
I !1A g1 V D bgp.t rAerCCT !'A CA Kr CC9T ! 3ECf PD~r6C1
CC%f
,1 'a ItW!
4TA ltCt ►aatCt
'y 1 lTL. CO Mo COT, s$1C ►AOItCT lTAr GR MR C:.
• tMb!
a,.
19 n,.,.,w.. m..^~'MiWV:~iL"w!M ....~..o. ..v.~~^•w.p{~~,CR r
sf , i r fa.n.\•,.J•M.. •.'.MYara .:mrv x......www.~.. -"Y
h
.
b'
AA -
i[
r
OPEN REa .
, 1
-
i°rl
,.k
sto#00
520 too J
5l0400
40+00:
Z
t
w
w
sa `
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
r
k - `
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
$
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
' 42 85 PERCENTILE SPEED
TOP SPEED P.!
EaS
URED
1 125 Nl;P'13ER Of CARS CHECKED
x " Q ' ATAL ACCIDENT SPEED
Y ^
, ,V
PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT CONT. 134 SE; '
PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENT j
-7 INDICATES SECTION ZONED
BY commISSION~MINU7E
} w.w' ~1+f. L PNNwR'
r_
s
M
17 7
`7 pt
FF OPEN
r~ r
ti { 350000
560+00 0701-00' 500+00
.
r~
yyrt
55 M.P H.
F Yri f
120 - 40
.'~~J'' R I A C ON 4O1 xs ~'~ASPH aUw nice ON 24 Y 4.4 q
•N OPEN
T
,
}
,d 4E
d 09
I . 'N ma
r
e e;.«~,~m...rv~ra+na+s.~ar+.r..nw ran.;1WAAA!1Mlti~d.r~rw.ww+r..n~wrrq~q~M~p'~~!' ~"'w•••• 5
f.
r r
r
v
Opt 0
*s.
e,
990+00
600+00, 6l0 +00
ha. 1 620400!
64_x•
ti.. A'
C aN -24r TRIPLE
As P. A`
dit wk 40 1t FLEY •t!R wRe 2 A` AW!
r
- - m6i
k ~rt
" ~ 'kM"~'M•'DCI(RAMW~tw{'}'M' .a*"rl~m Tw~r_ . r
roes ~
{rh, y
"WOMSO
_ , -
e Ms DWO
< .H.
i
9 ,
1
1' Y .
F ~
E N0+00 6~0 a 66000 670 0
ya ;
( 461
1 '
, - -
k 140 O'~ 12 4 100-!a
800
ODNf
X` ,
`@ n•.
y
Fri '
.
.~.....I
ZY-
RECEIVED NOV 18 ' The Selucryn School
, joNx D. DONCAbitsN 3333 university Dive west
wtADnums Denton twos 76201
(817) 362-6771
V
~I
Novembor 17, 1986
~d r
a 4.
M
~ t
i
I
Mr. Jerry Clark,
~r City Engineer
City of Denton
Municipal Building
r 215 E. McKinney
Deantonr Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Clarkr
At the request of Mr. Joe Thompson, Traffic Control
sw roreman, we are pleased to inform you that we have
ryw ; approximately 250 students enrolled at our `campus
located at the above address. We would appreciate
any help you could give us to get the school zone
sign moved so that motorists would obey the speed
y i limit. J
°5{ Thank you.
1. Sincerely
J D. Doncaster
x a
` H admaster
JDD/am
r
2{ r,. a 'A .rA ..w.
r
1692L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING SCHOOL SAFETY SPEED ZONES
ON FULTON STREET BEGINNING 200 FEET SOUTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH
LINDEN DRIVE AND ENDING AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH CORDELL STREET; I
ON BRYAN STREET BEGINNING 180 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH
t LINDEN DRIVE AND ENDING AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH CRESCENT STREET;
1 ON LINDEN DRIVE BEGINNING 150 FFET WEST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH
` FULTON STREET AND ENDING 190 FEET WEST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH
• ALICE STREET; ON CRESCENT STREET BEGINNING 370 FEET EAST OF ITS
e. INTERSECTION WITH BRYAN STREET AND ENDING I50 FEET EAST OF I.S
INTERSECTION WITH FULTON STREET; REDUCING THE MAXIMUM PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMIT FOR SUCH PORTIONS OF SAID STREETS FROM THIRTY (30) TO
TWENTY (20) MILES PER HOUR DURING CERTAIN HOURS; PROVIDING A
PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00);
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
I
SECTION I.
Based upon an engineering and traffic investigation hereto-
fore made as authorized by the provisions of Section 169, Article
6701d, V.T.C.S., the prima facie speed limit of twenty (20) miles
per hour for vehicles is hereby determined and declared to be
prima facie reasonable and safe, and such speed limit is hereby
fixed for vehicles traveling upon the following named streets and
highways, or parts thereof during the hereinafter designated
hours. The location of said school zones and the hours during
which laid speed zones shall be in effect are as follows to-wit:
Location Extent Hours in Effect
A. On Fulton Beginning 200 feet south of 7:30 a.m.-9:00 p.m.
j Street its intersection with Linden 3:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m.
{ Drive and ending at its inter-
1 section with Cordell Street.
B. On Bryan Beginning 180 feet north of 7:30 a.m.-9:00 p.n.
t Street Its intersection with Linden 3:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m.
Drive and ending at its inter-
section with Crescent Street.
4 .
C. On Linden Beginning 150 feet west of its 7;30 a.m.-9:00 p.m.
Drive intersection with Fulton 3,00
' p,m.-4:00 p.m.
` Street and ending 190 feet
west of Its intersection with
Alice Street.
. D. On Crescent Beginning 370 feet east of its 7:30 a.m.-9:00 p.m.
Street intersection with Bryan Street 3:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m.
and ending 150 feet east of
its intersection with Fulton
! Street.
,}a.. .r ,r.. r. . ...w .:...r_ k:..
F
o
ar
i .
SECTION 11.
An Individual adjudged guilty of exceeding this speed limit,
s' when signs are erected giving notice thereof, shall be guilty of a
r;; ? misdemeanor, and punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred
Dollars ($200.00).
SECTION III.
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause,
W phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it wculd have enacted such
E remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
~y I SECTION IV.
t That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
{ from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
i directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record- Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1487.
r.
4 `
h 1
Ky ° A , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
h
ATTEST:
4.
~y
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ti APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM.
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
C4
*x
BY.,
aLsfa.1
M
r -qr.. nk..... e. c wy',,~J~rtJ, r,. 4a
i
04
A
LV
' CITY of DENroN, rExA8 MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
{ e x' DATE: October 28, 1986
r'•. TO: CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION
FROM: Paul Iwuchukxu, Traffic Engineer Associate
r SUBJECT: School Zoning for Denton High School
The staff recommends zoning at Denton High School as follows:
' School speed limit signs:
a. On Fulton, 200 feet south of Linden, east side
b. On Fulton, at southwest corner of Fulton F Cordell
c. On Crescent, ISO feet east of Fulton, north side
F d. On Crescent, 370 feet east of Bryan, south side
r e. On Linden 190 feet west of Alice, north side
f. On Linden, ISO feet west of Fulton, south side
g, On Bryan, 180 feet north of Linden, east side
h, On Bryan, 80 feet south of Crescent, west side
M.s School crossings: NOTE: School crosswalks shall be 10-foot wide
`r. a. On Fulton, at north neck of Fulton 8 Crescent
' b. On Fulton, 230 feet south of Crescent
c. On Fulton, 390 feet south of Crescent
~'Is d. On Fulton, at south neck of Fulton I Linden
e. On Crescent, at west neck of Fulton I Crescent
ry ti = f. On Crescent, 520 feet east of Bryan
On Linden, at east neck of Fulton I Linden
t School crossing sighs:
.a
a. One sign at every crosswalk except where there is a stop
sign
b. Advance warning signs for school crossing to be placed ISO'
(min) to 700' before crosswalks or series of crosswalks.
t
"N0 Parking during school hour" signs:
a. On Crescent from Bryan to Fulton r
b. On Linden from Bryan to Fulton
:x c. On Fulton from Panhandle to Crescent
Resume normal speed limit signs:
a. 30 mph speed limit signs shall be posted at the end of
school tone (a11 approaches).(
R i 0424E
{r
t 1'
i
ydr
~ 4m~
dA-
4 page 3 of 9
Virginia Gallian asked, if they were requesting a
bike path from Bernard to Bonnie Brae. Mr. Estes
said they were, but some sections were not as
` important. Those students can come south onto Parvin
which runs in front of the school. All of the
to school on developments Willowwoodbuilt west
students
Borman must h come new
of
r
r. l Vivian Edwards asked the staff to set a target date.
a Jerry Clark said it would take 3-4 weeks to do the
study. Since Willowwood was not part of a bond
project, a source approximate funds w could bev $50t000be
% identified, The appro cost ,
$100,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDED: To delay action until further studies were
done and to seek any possible alternate
F routes.
COMMISSIONERS: Vivian Edwards made a motion tatthe staff
and Mr.
meet with the Citizenship club,
y. Estes. She asked, that they bring back a {
recommendation to the board at the next
meeting. Virginia Gallian seconded the
motion. Motion passed unanimously.
ITEM 13 SCHOOL ZONING FOR DENTON HIGH SCHOOL: I
Paul htuchukwu presented the request to the
commission. Paul said an ordinance could not be found
relating to school speed zoning and related signs.
He was using this opportunity to bring all signs at
the school into compliance and to have an ordinance
on file for permanent record. The following was
' recommended to the commission,
School speed limit signs are located as follows:
a. On Fulton, 200 feet south of Linden, east side
b. On Fulton, at southwest corner of Fulton @ Cordell
j, c. On Crescent, 150 feet east of Fulton, north side
d. On Crescent, 570 feet east of Bryan, south side
i; e. On Linden, 190 feet west of Alice, north side
. 41 f. On Linden, 150 feet west of Fulton, south side
y g. On Bryan, 160 feet north of Linden, east side
h. On Bryan, 80 feet south of Crescent, west side
a; .
School crossings;
a. On Fulton, at north neck of Fulton @ Crescent
b. On. Fulton) 230 feet south of Crescent
a c. On Fulton390 feet south of Crescent
d. on Fulton;, at south neck of Fulton @ Linden
n e. On Crescet, at west neck of Fulton @ Crescent
f. On Crescent, S20 feet east of Bryan
0 n g. Linden, at east neck of Fulton @ Linden
page 4 of 9
a NOTE: School crosswalks shall be 10-foot wide
School crossing signs;
a. One sign in each direction at every crosswalk
except where there is a stop sign
b. Advance warning signs for school crossing to be
placed 150 feet (min) to 100 feet before
crosswalks or series of crosswalks.
4 No Parking during school hour" signs;
a. On Crescent from Bryan to Fulton
b. On Linden from Bryan to Fulton
c. On Fulton from Panhandle to Crescent a
u. Resume normal speed limit signs;
a. 30 mph speed limit signs shall be posted at the
end of school zone (all approaches)r
Doris Chipman asked if these were any different than
ry,' they had been. Jerry Clark said there was no major
changes except advance warning signs would be
erected in all directions and resume speed signs
would be installed.
Bruce Chamberlain asked if the ordinance would
eliminate any parking. Paul said it would not.
STAFF RECOMMENDED: Approval j
h' COMMISSIONERS. Bruce Chamberlain made a motion to accept
the staff recommendation as stated. Vivian
Edwards seconded the motion. Motion passed
" unanimously. Y,
ITEM 44 SCHOOL ZONING FOR ROBERT E. LEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:
+n, r
Paul lwuchukwu presented the request. He said,, an
~ay+ ' ordinance could not be found regarding school speed
toning and related signs at Robert E. Lee. The
' following was recommended to the commission for
approval:
School speed limit signs;
a. at southwest corner of Mack Place I Lee Drive
b. at Paisley Drive, 200 feet west of Mack Drive,
south "side
a. c. at northeast corner of Mack Drive I Doubleoak
School crossing;
.l.u.k
W9w,
alp 1 5
T •E
+ • lIr , ~ •y ~ 9t
BRYAN Y ~ ~
r 0 , ~ a r ~
r ~
• s a • • . ;
r ! •
I AL r
• w
a 0 a
AL
I r i • r at • c r ~j
s a
la k All
u ~
~ r
r Y I r • R ~ 1
r ~
►4LTNN a
q=.
Z I q i
ALAN all
i
f
l
1686L
NO. _
` AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10-112, "FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION",
i OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TO PROVIDE
t'• i FOR ADOPT,ON OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGE- y
MENT AGENCY; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS THERETO; PROVIDING FOR
ADDITIONS THERETO; PROVIDING FOR DELETIONS THEREWITH; PROVIDING
FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has recently
~g promulgated regulations which revised the National Flood Insurance
Program floodplain management criteria; and
v". WHEREAS, the City of Denton is a participant in the National
Flood Insurance Program and as a condition for continued eligi-
bility in the program, the City of Denton must revise fioodplain
,F management regulations to be consistent with the revised National
Flood Insurance Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires to continue in the
National Flood Insurance Program and hereby adopts the following
revisions and additions to be incorporated in the Code of Ordi-
fiances of the City of Denton, Texas; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
'j
44`°r That Article II of Chapter 10.111 of the Code of Ordinances is
amended to read as follows:
Article II. Definitions
" Sec. 10 1/2-3. Words, Terms, Phrases Defined.
Unless specifically defined below, words, terms or phrases
used In this chapter shall be interpreted to give them the meaning
they have in common usage and to give this chapter its most
rea- sonable application.
"Appeal" means a request for a review of the city engineer's
Interpretation of any provision of this chapter or a request for
a variance.
"Area of shallow flooding" means a designated AO Zone on a
community's flood insurance rate map -(FIRM) with base flood
r
k
i
,.i
t
depths from one to three (3) feet. This condition occurs where a
clearly defined channel does not exist, where the path of
flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate, and where velocity ,
flow may be evident. t'
"Area of special flood hazard" is the land in the flood plain
within a community subject to a one percent or greater chance of
flooding in any given year, designated as Zone AE.
"Base flood" mear3 the flood having a one per cent chance of
j being equaled or exceeded in any given year.
"Critical feature" means an integral and readily identifiable
part of a flood pprotection system, without which the flood pro-
tection provided by the entire system would be compromised.
"Development" means any man-made change to improved or unim-
proved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or
other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving,
excavation or drilling operations.
"Elevated building" means a nonbasement building:
ti
t,
(a) built, in the case of a building in Zones AL-SD, AE, A, A
99, A0, AH, B, C, X, and D. to have the top elevated floor
elevated above the ground level by means of pilings,
columns (posts and piers), or shear walls parallel to the
floor of the water; and
b +
` i (b) adequately anchored so as not to impair the structural
integrity of the building of up to the magnitude of the
base flood. In the case of Zones Al-30, AE, A, A990 A0,
AH, B, C, X, and D, "elevated building" also includes a
building elevated by means of fill or solid foundation
perimeter walls with openings sufficient to facilitate
the unimpeded movement of flood water.
"Encroachment lines" are limits of obstruction of flood flows.
j. These lines are generally parallel to the stream, The lines are
established by assuming that the area landward (outside) of the
encroachment lines will be ultimately developed in such a way
w that it will not be availabio to convey floodflows. If hydraulic
efficiency of the floodway is maintained by protecting it against
` unnecessary encroachments, it will be adequate to convey the regu
latory_flood without resulting in a increase in flood elevations
't«, of more than on foot.
a'
4':x "Existing Construction" means for the purposes of determining
rates, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced
before August 1, 1979.
PAGE 2
y,
A~ ~jr
it - ~2
x
t
i
"Flood or flooding" means a general and temporary condition
of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from:
(a) The overflow of inland or tidal waters; +
_ i
3 (b) The unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface
waters from any source.
"Flood hazard boundary map (FHBM)" means an official map of a
community, issued by the Federal Insurance Administration, where
! the areas within the boundaries of special flood hazards have
been designated as Zone A.
"Flood insurance rate map (FIRM)" means an official map of a
community, on which the Federal Insurance Administration has
s s, delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk
premium zones applicable to the community.
"Flood insurance study" is the official report provided by
the Federal Insurance Administration. The report contains flood
profiles, the water surface elevation of the base flood, as well
r as the flood hazard boundary floodway map.
yt
"Floodplain" is the area outside the floodway which is still
subject to inundation by the regulatory flood. This area is
designated by the symbols FP.
r+ w: "Floodway" means the channel of a stream and adjacent land
areas which are required to carry and discharge the floodwater of
floodflows of any river or stream associated with the regulatory
flood with an allowable maximum increase in water surface
r, elevation above the regulatory flood of one foot. This area is
designated by the symbols FW.
"Functionally dependent use" means a use which cannot perform
its intended purpose unlese it is located or carried out in close
proximity to water. The irm includes only docRing facilities,
,y ! porn facilities that are necessary for the loading and unloading
i of cargo or passengers, and ship building and ship repair
facilities, but does not include long term storage or related
manufacturing facilities.
"Highest adjacent grade" means the highest natural elevation
of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed
walls of $ structure, j
"Levee" means a man-made structure, usually an earthen embank-
ment designed and constructed in accordance with sound engineer-
ing practices to contain, control, or divert the flow of water so
as to provide protection from temporary flooding.
~ + x
PAGE 3
i
r
i
j "Levee system" means the flood protection system which con-
sists of a levee, or levees, and associated structures, such as
closure and drainage devices, which are constructed and operated '
in accordance with sound engineering practices.
"Lowest floor" jeans the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed
area (including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant
enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access
or storage, in an area other than a basement area, is not con-
sidered a building's lowest floor, provided that such enclosure
is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the
applicable nonelevation design requirements of this ordinance and
44 C.F.R., section 60.3 of the National Flood Insurance Program
regulations.
"Manufactured home" means a structure, transportable in one
or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is
designed for use with or without a permanent foundation laying
r5~ connected to the required facilities. For flood plain management
purposes, the term "manufactured home" also includes park
trailers, travel trailers, and other similar vehicles placed upon
! site for greater than one hundred and eighty (180) consecutive
andurotherms"imidoes
lar
Er* n ts.inclFor ude insurance park trailers, tr vel term
vehicles.
"Manufactured home park or subdivision" means a parcel or
contiguous parcels of land dividod into two or more manufactured
home lots for rent or sale.
"Mean Sea Level" for purposes of the National Flood Insurance
Program, the National Geodetic Vertical Data (NGVD) of 1929 or
other datum, to which base flood elevation shown on a communities
flood insurance rate map are referineed.
"Minimum building elevation". The elevation to which uses
regulated by this chapter are required to be elevated or flood-
proofed. This elevation would be equal to the elevation that
could be reached by the regulatory flood if it occurred under con-
,nditions existing at the time this ordinance was passed, plus one
foot to allow for encroachments permitted by the establishment of
• floodways; i.e., minimum building elevation equals regulatory
flood elevation plus one foot.
"New construction" means, for flood plain management purposes,
F structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or
after the effective date of a flood plain management regulation
adopted by a community.
r
,
PAGE 4
t,,.
ilk
v, c
=t
i
i
"Obstruction" means any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee,
dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, chaarel rectifi-
cation, bridge, conduit, culvert, building, wire, fence, rock
gravel, refuse, fill structure or matter in, along across, or
projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory flood
hazard area which may impede, retard, or change the direction of
f the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting
debris carried by such water, or that is placed where the flow of
water might carry the same downstream to the damage of life or
property.
"Program deficiency" means a defect in a community's flood
plain management regulations or administrative procedures that
impairs defective implementation of those flood plain management
r' regulations or of the standards contained in Sections 60.3. 60.4,
60.5, or 60.6 of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations.
s>
"Regulatory flood" means a flood which is representative of
large floods known to have occurred generally in the area and
reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on a
particular stream. The regulatory flood generally has an average
frequency in the order of the one hundred (100) year recurrence
interval flood determined from an analysis of floods on a
particular stream and other streams in the same general region.
,n •e
"Remedy a violation" means to bring the structure or other
development into compliance with state or local flood plain
management regulations, or, if this is not possible, to reduce
the impact of its noncompliance. Ways that impact may be reduced
{ include protecting the structure or other effective development
from flood damages, implementing the enforcement provisions of
the ordinance or otherwise deterring future similar violations,
or reducing federal financial expenditure with regard to the
structure or other development.
"Start of construction" includes substantial improvements,
and, means the date the building permit was issued, provided the
actual start of construction, repair, reconstru-tion, replace-
ment or other improvement was within one hundred and eighty
(1845 days of the permit date. The actual start means either the
first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a
site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the Installation
of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the
't stage of excavation, or the placement of a manufactured home on a
foundation. Permanent construction does not include land pre-
paration, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it
y include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it
Tab ' include excavation for a basement, footings, piers) or founda-
tions or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the
installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as
. ~ c
PAGE S
r'
i,
1
garages or sheds not occupied as dwellings units or not part of
the main structure.
"Structure" is anything constructed or erected, on the ground,
or attached to the ground, including, but without limiting, the a
generality of the foregoing: buildings, factories, sheds, cabins,
manufactured homes, and other similar items.
j "Substantial improvement" means any repair, reconstruction,
or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or
exceeds fifty (SO) percent of the market value of the structure
either; (a) before the improvement or repair is started; or (b)
if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before
I the damage occurred. For the purposes of this definition "sub-
stantial improvement" is considered to occur when the first
alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part
of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects
the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not,
however,include either: (a) any project for improvement of a
structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary,
or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure
safe living conditions; or (b) any alteration of a structure
i listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State
Inventory of Historic Places.
l Market value determination, for the purposes of the above
definition, shall be made by the City Engineer by making a deter-
urination of the cost of repair, reconstruction, or improvement,
who may consider appraisals by the taxing district, information
4~ contained in the permit application, as well as other information
s { that may be available to the department or other resource.
"Variance" is a grant of relief to a person from the require-
ments of this chapter when specific enforcement would result in
unnecessary hardship. A variance, therefore, permits
construc- tion, or development in a manner otherwise prohibited by this
chapter.
"Violation" means the failure of a structure or the develop
sent to be fully compliant with the community's flood plain l
management regulations. A structure or other development without
6 the elevation certificate, or other certifications, or other evi-
dence of compliance required in 44 C.F.R., sections 60.3 (b) (S),
(c)(4), (c)(10), (d)(3), (e)(2), (e)(4), or (e)(S) is presumed to
be in violation 11.ntil such time as that documentation is provided.
"Water surface elevation" means the height in relation to the
` National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 129 (or other datum v
where specified), of floods of various magnitures and frequencies t
in the flood plains of coastal or riverine areas.
f
PAGE 6
a
t
1
SECTION II.
That Section 10 1/2-12 (f) of Article IV. "Administration" of-
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Section 10 1/2-12. Duties and Responsibilities of the City
Eng Fier
(f) When base flood elevation data has not been provided in
11 accordance with Section 10 1/2-S the City Engineer shall
obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any base flood
elevation data available from any federal, state, or
other source as criteria for requiring the new construc-
tion, substantial improvements, or other developments in
Zone A and meet the requirements of 44 C.F.R., section
60.3 (C) (2), 31 S, 6, and D (g) of the National Flood
Insurance Program in order to administer the provisions
of Article V of this Chapter.
y In unnumbered A Zones and Zone X, the base flood eleva-
tion shall be Pstabiished through an engineering study
and this data shall be used for requiring the lowest
floor elevation to one foot above the base flood
elevation.
' r SECTION 111.
That Section 10 1/1-12 of Article IV. "Administration" of the
„ F Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended by
adding a subsection to be numbered 10 1/2-12 (g) which said
section reads as follows:
(g) The City Engineer shall maintain on record in the Public
u~ c.t Works Department, the elevation of the lowest floor
(including basement) of new and substantially improved
y•, structures in all special flood hazard areas.
SECTION IV.
That Section 10 1/2-14 of Article IV. "Administration" of the
Fh'~ Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, is hereby amended by
adding subsections to be numbered 10 1/2.14 (i) and (J) to the
" application for development permit information, which said
subsections read as follows:
for subdivisions of three or more acres or 30 lots or
more, whichever is less, the base flood elevations of
such subdivisions must be developed by the builder and
h PAGE 7^
it
a
i
I this data will be utilized to regulate development within
the area,
(j) for areas outside identified flood hazard areas, the
elevation shall be that which is required by Chapter
29-07 of the Uniform Building Code which requires a
i minimum six (611) elevation above adjacent ground to
compensate for loss of stormwater storage or drainage
areas.
SECTION V.
That Section 10 1/2-16 of Article V. "Provisions for Flood t
Hazard Reduction" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton,
Texas, is hereby amended by adding two subsections, to be numbered
l0 1/2.16 (g) and (h) which said subsections read as follows:
(g) Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air
conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall
be designed and/or located so as to prevent water from
;r. entering or accumulating within the components during
F conditions of flooding. All exterior equipment shall be
elevated one foot above the base flood elevation. t
(h) For all new construction and substantial imFrovements
o
" fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are
subject to flooding shall be designed to automatically
' equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by
allowing for the entry and exist of flood waters.
Designs for meeting this requirement must either be
a certified by a registered professional engineer or
architect or must meet or exceed the following minimum'
criteria:
f~
(1) A minimum of two openings having a total net area of
not less than one square inch for every square foot
of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be
provided.
(2) The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than
one foot above grade.
L~1t (3) Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, or
other coverings or e+;vices provided they permit the
automatic entry and exit of flood waters.
' SECTION VI,
That Section 10 1/2-17 "Specific Standards" of Article V.
"Provisions for Flood Hazard Reduction" of the Code of Ordinances
'r
1 s
PAGE 9
y <
r
1
}
i
~ of the city of Denton, Texas, shall be amended to read as follows'
Section 10 1/2-17. Specific Standards f
(a) Residential construction. New construction or substantial
improvement of any residential structure shall have the
lowest floor, including basement, elevated one foot above
the base flood elevation. A registered professional
engineer, architect, or land surveyor shall submit a
certification to the city engineer that the standard of
this subsection, as proposed in section 10 1/2-14(a), is
satisfied;
(b) Nonresidential construction, New construction or sub-
stantial improvement of any commercial, industrial or
} other nonresidential structure shall either have the
lowest floor, including basement, elevated to the level
of the base flood elevation or, together with attendant
utility and sanitary facilities, be floodproofed so that
below the base flood level the structure is water tight
s, i with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of
water and with structural components having the capabil-
ity of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and
effects of buoyancy. A registered professional engineer
i5 or architect shall submit a certification to the city
X' enginear that the standards of this subsection as proposed
in section 10 1/2-14(c), are satisfied;
i (c) Manufactured Homes
(1) All manufactured homes to be placed within Zone A on
a community's FHBM or FIRM shall be installed using
methods and practices which minimize flood damage.
/t For purposes of this requirement, manufactured homes
' must be elevated and anchored to resist floatation.
Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited
to use of over the top or frame ties to ground
R anchors. This requirement is in addition to appli-
cable state and local anchoring requirements for
resisting wind forces.
(2) All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially
' improved within Zone Al-30, AH, and AE shall be
elevated on a permanent foundation such as the lowest
ei7" floor of the manufactured home is at least one foot
. above the base flood elevation and be securely
"r
x anchored to an adequately anchored foundation in
accordance with provisions of Section 23-74 (b)(6) of
1~ Yt
the Denton City Code.
f PAGE 9
l~
I,
~f
3
4
r
t
SECTION VII.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance,
or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements
thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall
'rY be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), Each such person shall be deemed
guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion
thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed,
or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such
person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION VIII,
R. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of
its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1997.
RA E p WOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
q
ATTEST:
ii
JENNIFER WALTERS
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
' DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
' PAGE 10 ;
. ~ ,
.r,
' ,'r E
CIT1~ol DENTON, TaXA~ MUNICIPAL 8~1!lO1NQ / DENTON, TEXAS 7920! / TElEPNONE (a f7J dEA-E307
tNfJc~ of the Gty M+neQ.r
- M E M O R A N D U M
n r M~ T0: Lloyd V, karrell, City Manager
, , ~ FROM.
` Rick Svehla, Assistant L'ity Manager
~ M1~, DATE: March 5, 1987
„ SUBJECT: FEMA Regulations
~
Ar f
~F'
1
` ~ Attached is a memo from Jerry that talks about the changes that
K FEMA would like us to make. These are nothing more than
further clarification oP the existing FEMA ordinance.
~ 4 f~
The main changes concern manufactured housing or mobile homes.
f t. The repulatlons are now chars in~ to include then
r"~ ,s:~ mi would regular stick-built .houses (i,e, more requirementsthon
anchoring the. structures, requiring the fihished floors to be ,`r
~r ~ ~ one foot above flood levels, etc. )
~M *,c•
They have also included more definitions, Again, a number of a w.
~,~,~r these deal with the manufactured homes. There aro also some
x°,;~, more clarifications on habitable floors and some clarifications J,
~?~{1,?. on some of the flood terms. '
Fine ly,
ar:y., kE have added a t:ouplE of provisions that will enable
c~ .y, us to be able to calculate the amount of repairs or remodeling, `
t, x. ~ in comparistsn to appraised values. This will allow us to make
fs"'~. a determination for: an existing house !n the flnodway and
'
` ` whether it would he atlie to be remddeled or repaired.
~ ~y 'tip
~ ~ If'you or the Council have -any Purther
questions, we wily be
happy to try-and answer them at the meeting,
, ' r 1 _
~
K4 r~,S,:
f
r
~ { ,a~~.~ 1{ C~C Ye 9 u
~f ~'"Y Assista'ht City Manager
tl ~
A a ]
• ~ d1 `4
t"` tir ~ 3357M
,
e Y ! , s w.
eS 1
F([f ~I; `
B ~ J 9 ~
f L .
~ ~Cyb ~ 2«"i~FRWr ,na &R1 "lraY Yk.?wl~~„r
fit; v M. `"~^k+~; a'w iP.:
~r' ~ ~ r a
i
r
~S, 4
T ~~1.
L _ S
.I
CITY of DffNTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, texas 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 2, 1987
TO: 7-rk Svehla, Assistant City Manager
r FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
I' SUBJECT: Changes in Ordinance Section 10.5 regarding
floodplain insurance map
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has provided all cities
currently in the program with revisions necessary to maintain
participation in the Federal Insurance Program. Those changes
a involve mobile homes, definitions of habitable floors and other
strong suggestions that would establish finished floors greater
than one foot or above the base flood elevations.
The Legal staff has completed the necessary revisions to the
r" ordinance which we feel exceed the minimum requirements by the
a Federal Emergency Management Agency. Our existing ordinance
was more restrictive than the minimum previously required by
FEMA in some of these areas. However, we have clarified or
upgraded those areas to insure that we are above the minimum
standards.
f We have also included a couple of minor changes or
cla,rificatit+ns to further improve our ordinance. One
specifically, is the definition of who can establish the value
of a structure when it lies in the floodway to determine the
t` 56% remodeling limits. The ordinance now exceeds requirements
as stated in the enclosed letter from the Federal Emergency
Agency.
Please place this on the City Council agenda to insure that we
C; maintain our participation in the flood insurance rate map
t° program.
Please advise if questions arise.
x' C Qo,. A
Jar C1 r ; P.E.
City E(er
0448E
,
1 + ~k`0~l,rrvire.f ..r..... _ - _ ..nto-..y; ..:n ,...n.K-.M•-.-.. . ,,Al.'WNgYlii l.ayS
4
1
1
.
nrn~IVED SEY 2 f 4988
/y
Federal Emergency Management Agency ,
Washington, D.C. 20472
G
2 160.3(c)(d)(e) Communities)
MEMORANDUM FOR: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
FROM : Francis V. Reilly
Deputy Administrator
Federal Insurance Administration
SUBJECT : Revisions to National Flood Insurance
x f Program Floodplain Management Criteria
j On August 25, 19861 the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
` published a final rule in the Federal Register which revises National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) E oodp a n management criteria (copy
attached). I appreciate the many comments provided by communities
on the proposed rule, which was forwarded to you previously. A
number of these comments have been incorporated into the final rule
and others will be considered in the future.
FEMA believes that the provisions in this final rule and the earlier
final rules will assist you in implementing and administering your
local ordinance and, in addition, help to further reduce future
flood damages in your community. These rules conclude a 2-year
effort to revise NFIP criteria to reflect the experience and know-
ledge gained implementing the NFIP criteria during the nearly 10
' . years since the last significant changes became effective. No
V11 I ~ substantive changes are planned during 1987 and we will seek to
t minimize changes that impact on particpating communities in sub-
sequent years.
i
t 'r
r y The final rule becomes effective on October 1, 19861 NFIP criteria
at $60.7 require, as a condition of continue$ eligibility for
participation in NFIP, that communities revise their floodplain
anagement regulations to make them consistent with any revised
rr
l NFIP regulation within six months of the effective, date of that
~w revision. Consequently, your community will have to amend their
regulations to comply with the August 250 1986, final rule no later
than A,,11_1,_1987. FEMA Regional Office staff will be glad
ry' to provide ada~dvvice and assistance. After your amendments have been
adopted, communities should submit copies of their amended
. regulations to the appropriate Regional Office (see attached list).
.w ,
e
'~~Mcb_..,.ri.+^V'~xll.t_r .tlk!•8,.r',y., r.r•,:.,.. »..a 1"~~,,~
2.
If, subsequent to the conclusion of this six-month adoption period
on April 1, 19870 FEMA determines that your community has not
amended its regulations so that they comply with this final rule,
your community will be subject to suspension. However, prior to
suspending your community, FEMA will follow the procedure at
559.24(a). The Administrator will provide written notice to your
community, at leant 90 days prior to the proposed suspension date,
indicating that your community's floodplain management measures are
deficient and must be amended to comply with the final rule. If
compliant regulations are not submitted at least 30 days prior to
the suspension date, the Administrator will provide written notice
to your community of its loss of eligibility for the sale of flood
insurance and will publish notice in the Federal Register under
Part 64 of Subchapter B. The suspension will go into effect if
compliant regulations are not adopted and submittal prior to the
suspensio-i date.
I have attached an information sheet which outlines those changes
i' which are required and explains how those changes are to be made.
i. In addition, you should refer to the supplementary information in
j the final rule for responses to comments and explanations of the
various changes. This information sheet also contains guidance on
how to make changes included in this and previous final rules which
became effective on October 1, 1984 and January 1, 1986. Please
make these changes if you have not done so already. Also note that
you are only required to adopt an ordinance that meets or exceeds
NFIP criteria. As a result, you need only make those changes which
are more restrictive than your current ordinance provisions. in
addition, you should be aware that a number of States have flood-
plain management regulations that are more restrictive than NFIP
criteria. Your ordinance must continue to meet these more restric-
tive state tequirements. If you have doubts as to whether your
f current ordinance provisions or proposed amendments to that
ordinates meet one of the new requirements, pls,.i~se contact the
appropriate FEMA Regional Office or your State Coordinating Agency
v for the NFIP. If your question regards ccaapltance with more
restrictive State regulationsi please contact the appropriate State
' V agency.
Again, if you have questions regarding the final rule or any other
r NFIP requirement or need technical assistance cif any kind, please
' contact the appriopriate FEMA Regional Offica ~r your NFIP State
Coordinating Agency.
Attachment
° 1750L
' s
NO. ~I
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATING TO
;l I AN EVALUATION OF FLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
t
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
i DENTON HERESY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton
here y kproves an agreement between the City of Denton and
Deloitte Haskins F Sells for professional services for an
evaluation of Flow Memorial Hospital, a copy of which is
'I attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
t.'
SECTION If. That the City Council authorizes the
expen ture o one-half of the funds in the manner and amount as
specified in the Agreement.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
immedately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the r day of , 1987,
ry
4
yR y ,
I I Y
RAY STEPRENSj MAYOR
CITY OF D5NTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
r,r ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
- CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
,
,ws '1N
BY:
4 1 3
+ y I I Rte" r...... w........,4 - . _ _
~I IY K 7 p; ~~~{C
k r ~
yA
}
r
f
s 1721E
,y
RESOLUTION NO.
f A RESOLUTION POSTPONING THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7
1987; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. '
WHEREAS, the regular Council nieetitig of the City of Denton
scheduled for April 7, 1981 is hereby postponed,, NOW, THEREFORE, s
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
'SECTION I.
A' That the regular Council meeting to be held on April 7, 1987
fit; 1~ bo postponed until April 9, 1987.
PASSED AND APPROVFD this the day of 1987,
CITY OP DSNTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
r~ ;l ACTING CITY SECRETARY ?
CITY OF DENI'ON, TEXAS
Y
rdr~' APPAOVE7 AS TO LEGAL POO :
~DEBRA ADAM ;DRAYOVITCH CITY ATTORNEY
a; CITY OF DENtON, TEXAS
R n 1 ~ -
e,T
,
n, h~
1
lld t
T~j+r
I,.
i
0375E
!J
$ RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING FRY STREET BETWEEN THE
INTERSECTION OF OAK STREET AND HICKORY STREET ON SUNDAY, APRIL
26, 1987, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
I
WHEREAS on Sunda
Fraternity is sponsoring anpSpring 6 Renaissance eto Si A Mu
bemhe dlpon Fry
Street between the iltersection of Oak and Hickory; and
z WHEREAS, all abutting property owners of the street have
given their permission to the temporary closing of said stroet;
' Mn • 1
r WHERE-AS, the Spring Renaissance is open to the general
f, public of of the City and County of Denton; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for the said
z Renaissance and in order to
protect
attend, the City Council oftheCity e of afDenton deemsenit wis
lit necessary to temporarily close a portion Street and Hickory Street from the hours ofy8:00eA,M beuntil
6:30 P.M. on Sunday, April 26, 1987; NOW, THEREFORB,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION 1.
That Fry Street between Oak Street and Hickory Street shall
b`. be temporarily closed as a street or public thoroughfare of any
kind or character whatever on Sunday, April 26, 1987 from 8:00
A.M. until 6:30 P.a, for the purpose of holding the Sigma Alpha
Mu Spring Renaissance provided, however, that the following
conditions are met by the Sigma Alpha Mu Fraternity:
1. The fraternity will provide someone to help keep the
parking lot clear of non-church members;
2, T
hat the fraternity will clean up after the Spring
Renaissance; and
3. That no music will be played until 12:15 P.M.
SECTION Ili
That the portion of the above described streets shall revert
back to the City for normal traffic activity immediately from
r and after 600 P.M, on Sunday, April 26, 1987.
r.
1 e~ ,
I
rl J
r
r
nSECTION_
r That in the event of rain, said street may be closed on
Sunday, May 3, 1987,
SECTION IV*
sha ~I and effecthfrom and atfter heldatekoEeits ctassa ae in foil force
;r M` PASSED AND APPROVSD this the P $ and approval.
day of too,
r.!
7 ryv 7, r
sl .i
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
ACTING'CITY SBCRETARY
r> CITY OT DENTON, TEXAS
. f , ,;I Y r. rl
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR1Nt ,
E DEBRA ADAW DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
B Y t ==L ~r» a
/r
5
~,.Y
a
I, 5 1)i 1 r
k 1 PACE 2
~Ea
?iW'i4wlNiFie4Y.iECt ilMrV.<nw-:...
` r
I
a'
beta El6n+e Cha ur North Terp estate Unive►el
1806 West Oak •ureet .
a' •A' i i Gorden, Tarp 76801 .
Telephone 161713133.-34Q6
V67
1
Dear Counoil Vember,
I am writing thin letter to you on behelf the 8th annuol Fry Ft, Fair
S • '
>7 whioh benefits the United Way of Ibntor. of Lento", The men of :ipQa rlpha
' W have worked long and hard to make
Y '.Ty .treat Fair as safe tnd enjoyatle
t, ae possible for everyone, who attends.
.
;xP Teoauae of Fry fit. Fair, sigma „lpha Ku heo, been able to riite close br,
r'A ' a
A N, to ?5,C00 for the United 'day. ?tithout your tupFort this could not have
rti J'
r been'poojible. On February 17, ve vili be asking for you. support 6gain
90 that wo are able to obtyin the use of Fry 3to between 't. Oak St, and
t
` hickory It. on °unday April 26th. ;n
Y 4ver.tiorr yot may have concerning
the Fair, ploas feel froo to 01411 me at 3e3-346a,
'
A
■ / eincyrely,
'.('ally .;Icharda
r Ireo !dent ,
Y
r . iFM'4M+-pv.-.'..iIA.r 'vw .rte i.. .~M!!Wc~M~jIMA ,'~~,p'IIr , , •':M1i'.Iis,~~ ,nay ~
' v.
4~ r
a
,
~'q 1x' x e ~ 'v
r ,
Ya ~ ^
t~,a
tk
I.,
I
t
v
H
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
ANO
TEXAS COIIlOS OF OBTCOPATHIC MLOICIN!
! . i I P.O. SOX 13737
'y DENTON, TIMA! 76203-3737
7 O►/lCI OF TMI CMAMMLOI
lf January 301 1987
IRIRr
Mrb i~ f h
I Preeidener Richards
Sigma Alpha Hu Fraternity
1305 W, Oak
x+'' Denton, Texas 76201
1 I
Dear Waittel
~,4 r r 3 wa6 very pleased to receive the attached oorreapondenob from
y` Hs, Jerry Needham, Executive Director of United Way of Denton
County, Inc. Once again, your willingness to serve local
com- munity needs on nuoh abort notioe has reflected well +1pon NTSU
and your fraternity,
w.
f Please pass on to all on the list my appreciation for their
t unselfishness and willingness to go the extra mile. All the
~t r very beat to your members through the spring semester and after.
Sincerely,
ed .'r Hurley
C as 014
rr
a , ah
cot Phil Diebel
Joe` Stewart
' t 2aohYry Tucker
` Attachment
~ I f
~11 ~i 1 It
y ru
'.'MwisJ•x1A w.r.rN OV.1'AIMI,.riM1
%
i
a
1 y
/Ol7
United Way of Denton County, Inc
7~
Serving Denton, Argyle, Aubrey, to tint , Corinth, Krunt, Lak Dallas,
Little Elrn Area, Pilot Point, Pander, Roan ke~S
,r ~~~~r, SJrady~Slro~es_-~
January 22, 1987 t`~''. '•1 ~ ,
yQ
. 1 Dr. Alfred F. Hurley JAN26
Chancellor MRe54ti c~1 u~ LICE
Nort r P r h Texas State University Box 13737
p Denton, Texas 76203
i
co
n: siGm ALPHA w FRAwNMY
Dear Dr. }Hurley
This is to advise you that on January 20, 1937 the following
meunhers df t}a above mentioned fraternity assisted the united
Way staff in a sorely needed office tminten project.
hauled trawl, hawed furniture, re m and They awe Paired a Bask and assi assisted in Janar r' ThaTh spirit war contacted after 4:00 p
is cooperation and wit spirit
~lY appreciatsa. Y spirit
% r` PAR TICIPAMS H
Barry tbrsvloff
Greg Etensley
' (Mahn V. Lovell
Robert D. Taaffe
a Eli Silva
Dr. Hurley, it is most helpful to organizations such as the
thzitet Way to have your interest and nniverbit En00uY
for student life participation. Y agement
~ , ~ y 8incez'ely,
v
a F
Jerry Ann Needham
Nft*ive Director
1
Y.
301 EASY OAK • DENTON, TEXAS 76201 • 617•se8.26691
stir
r
1
1A
z
t,d F . r .Q.
y
United Way of Denton County, Inc.
Serving Denton, Argyle, Aubrey, Corinth, Justin, Krum,
Lake Dallas,
Little Elm Area, Pilot Point, Ponder, Roanoke, Sanger, Shady Shores
9
f~
January 220 1981
Mr. Wally Rgchards
President
Sigma Alpha M1 Fraternity
1305 W. Oak
Denton, Texas 76201 '
~ A•
r r ;4k" Dear Mr. Richalds:
Cn behalf of the officers of the Board of Directors of the United
Way of Denton County, Inc., it is
my pleasure to extend air deep 1
,appreciation for the assistance mff*. ws c.F the fraternity provided
to us on January 20, 1987. It is esoeeially meaningful when the
call for help was made after 4100 y.m., on January 19. 'AtAt is I
really rallying.
'+he brothers who helped us were delightful, And I look forward to
retaining a friendship with them. Please extend my pereonel gratitude
as well as the board's appreciation to them. Those participating were) ,
Barry Morsvloffi Greg Hensley, Graham V. Wvelli Robert D. Taaf fee and
911 Silva.
r I Sincerely,
.
Sk '4~
a , a
Jerry Arm Needham
• T 4
f y,1 301 CAST OAK DENTON. TEXAS 76201 817.866.26e8- s
9r'vx1 nl
Y P • ...•avr,ae.r.a.CtiM7.l~i:I arlMr '--l'
,bRBr `
r
4yr> ~.1 b
J y A
, b
}1 i
j
C1rY01 DENTON,TZX43 MUNIMAL SUfLOING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
4 +,I ~
April 25, 1985
s° + } Sammy House
North Texas State University
Denton, Texas
~xi,
Dear Hembersc r;
On behalf Of the Denton Police Depattmenti t want to express my
appreciation for, your recant assistance during a disturbance on Fry
Street, Sergeant Wright has informcd me that your assistance was
invaluable, end your cooperation' turned a potentially violent and
extremely volatile situation into a simple crowd dispersement. he
added that you also swept the street and cleaned the area after the
crowd had l6it. Thank you for lending us a hand and distinguishing
yourselves as oitisens any community would be proud to have as
y
''I residents.
Sincerely,
y „
o- t ~tugh Lynch
ti° s Chief of Police
r,
r
y. 11 ,M Mw_.9 Tr.r
T T r•.:I:.ti(.wn.cr,+aH.ia',IA.'YSW.,+kply~ll.,YH, JPJC.HkrNn r.. - ~{~a(. I~ 1
r
P
,
,
'1 ti a r .
1
,
M1
L r
gi owilig
in
grace
r
gmoe temple baptist church
ttF
Aon foWrnondo, DAM.
p r'F Tutor .
Ran W,Hol-Ur
kf, i mOolePastor February 9, 1987
llandrd Bordln
o- 1 MIMIS1 C? of music
z Nec1 t, vtdoon
Mlni,ta°f c4nsjo Dear Mr. Richards:
fi.
SOON "gAtort
Mlrlotorof rcuth
I RE: 8th Annual Fry St. Fair
DebrisMair
eettdr.,, While this letter is not to be understood as an endorsement, we do not
stand in opposition to the Fry Street Fair, to take place on Sunday,
April 26th, 1987,
f We request, however, that the following conditions be observed:
s ;,y It The organizers of the Fair shall not begin outdoor music until
12:15 p,m. so as not to disturb church services.
r;
'fc 2, The organizers of the Fair shall provide adequate parking lot
security for Grace Temple Baptist Church, t,
a
M1 3, The organizers shall provide clean-up around Grace Temple Baptist
4 r;~r Church after the Fair is over to allow for Sunday evening services,
Sincerely,
,wS. 7tH ti.
Ro Fellemende Pastor
4 RF/bb
1
sr
t<`
a f, ;
*P
I
7L "
1106 twit Oak denton, Was 76201 (817) 387•dl,7
a
F11 p•xb,.y~...r . ~rru:.mu ar. ..H7 ,y TF:~R^fxx,.. - ,y
y. ! Y' "M~.F1+/9i1)~rY i"'T ~ ~Y'1FD,'IWy,~f 9.!
~i c J
t
~a " ~ :fir 5, ! V : V .I. a i 1 . ~f r
AA -
ilk,
~.r
+~a fA"t~✓yyi.,~/.l.-a.a...
r.
t,
o 11 11,
41 6k~
,r
{
r. V~ ~ ~ r Fp .
a
Y,
J
f 1j
Yr fry.
1 .
a r } 11
i,'~'~$R! vow, i
k 1
y
h ~ ! 'r
01
pr...«..+rw"ss.w...,.r.. ..wr.....".,YY~Y.M,w'.M5'ilWKW7NiC1;PW'rs r.nu. w.x»•. r.r w.yAy,di w
y ,
w,
/,r , wait v~~ x`~ ii ~ i {
"ra r ~~Q v „ e .;1,'. . , . r. . „i r` 1 , r i~ •ta. " r a u ' •,~N fI"%/3'ry'-
AA. iA -11.
j II
- rv
' r
r
-
i r..
t
r `
r+
v ~
Irl
>r
~ t
pNi Frn
a
F4
a•
'I
5\
y
.rid ,_,r.._.-....._-t_-- _
r
i
r,
v1 ` ~
n ,
' r
f r
f
i
y :4 C r... '^,w. .W+ib'"A-4r•!~i%nM'+M xrNrd¢.v ax .
'AV +R r
I jr
r
°r
r J,
r.i
We, the undenrigned and Fcryarty owner: of Fry 5trent, give our convent
for the uee of Fiy it. 1,1t1471.z Cd.k °t. and Hickory "t. on Sunday, April 26th,
er. (Rain Date, May, 3rd), 1967 for the 8th annual Fry It. Fair benefiting the United
icy of Denton. '
r
4.
F'r a„ 5,
~jt r I.
;r I
ySy 4 .
1~ a 7
Q}' i
T c
,f..d
S k I f•.
JJ!jj!``.. I
N~Tr~ ` rl w+.+wyr+mw.r nryq yg .`,r
4.,11r nim ,KwrM yuaaM....a.r ~.'.p.MUe'+~'pW4'.ir3Li#".111W.'1'RNIUN'J JHSiRirµW+ r,L\'KRa'~,~Y~1 , ~§y +
1 i ` ,pro xrr ,N
:ylir
' I t
6 tl ~ Q'.' '.I } I' 4
rf
It~
r 4~Y" ~.~r ~'•d" t ~ ~tFI ~~a ~t~'~ i ; t ~ ° e t r^. ' X, e., ja ~;r i i' h . .r„I R ,i~r. fr.~'"i ' 7~'
S
r
I/14/87
We, the undersigned and merchants of Fry Street, give our consent
for the use of Fry St, between Oak St. and Mokory St. on Sunday,
April 26th, 1987 for the 8th annual Fry St. Fair benefiting the United s
Way of Denton.
J, •
4
C
,r 1 ~ Gam= Q~ ~ u~ '
iJl r ~ r ~ ~
' a' ' 8 '~l Ind. S b V ~-O
4.
`r .
y
X
~ tY
Iy14.1~ v6
I tT~ r n .r ~y,, y C
s .+'+etw r/X+,.~.w. .:r ,a.,... .e..,.. w*e xe NSnC w6iM'Jlfi✓T f++F
J P 1
,
I
.
t
DATE: 03/10/87
o CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
9
a TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
~LL r
SUBJECT: Resolution on Proposed Air Quality Controls for
1 Denton County
a
i RECOMMENDATION:
Y Adoption of resolution.
{ SUMMARY: Many cities in Denton County have adopted or are
a ;w consieering similar resolutions.
BACKGROUND: Numerous work sessions have covered the background.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: y
All
FISCAL IMPACT:
}r. $3.6 million the first year of implementation.
„s
a Respec lly submitted:
f
<z
Ctty ran'
a~ Prepared; by:
a ,,N a y e r ,
Director of anning
;j and Development
b
3
y
fP t'
l r, t S S { ~j
1732L
1
1 ~u
RESOLUTION NO. a
c
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS RELATING TO THE ENVIRON -
f MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S PROPOSED AIR QUALITY CONTROLS FOR
DENTON COUNTY, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton is fully
supportive of clean air in Denton County and the Dallas-Fort
Worth metrtoplex and "all reasonable efforts" to reach this goal
in the "roost effective and economically feasible" manner; and
Y'
WHEREAS, the Council is aware that the United States
Environmental Protection Agency has mandated revisions to the
s State Implementation Plan which could impose stringent ozone
controls on Denton County; and
,
WHEREAS, this mandate is based upon highly questionable
s interpreietions of federal law, agency regulations, and analysis
of ozone values from a monitoring site which was intended to
measure downwind effects from Dallas-Fort Worth and not to
represent the air quality affected by sources in Denton County;
and
WHEREAS, analysis indicates that controls applied to Denton
County will not change peak ozone concentrations at the Denton
County monitoring site and that attainment of tho ozone standard
is dependent on emission reductions in Dallas and Tarrant
a Counties, whose ozone is carried by prevailing winds into Denton
County; and
WHEREAS, Environmental Protection Agency states that their
primary reason for requiring controls is that Denton County
commuter traffic contributes 3.11 of the total vehicle travel in
" Dallas and Tarrant Counties and not because of locally generated
emissions, with a secondary reason that there is a potential for
new emission sources (business and industries) to locate in
Denton County instead of Dallas or Tarrant Counties; and
' WHEREAS, imposition of the vehicle emission controls in
" Denton County may reduce ozone levels by only 0.91 of the amount
IV
needed for attainment in Dallas and Tarrant Counties, at an
exorbitant cost of $4,157 per ton of reduction and an initial
cost to Denton County residents of almost $3.S million; and
r WHEREAS, the other controls and the offset requirement for
new or expanding industry/business in particular would have a
#1 severe negative impact on Denton County's economic development
~ 1 {
14,
h
-t¢
F
in the county, which would reduce
and the generation of jobs
K' commuter traffic to Dallas and Tarrant Counties; and
~ WHEREAS, similar controls are not bean proposed for counties
south of Dallas and Tarrant Counties which could be expected to
cause downwind problems for Dallas, Tarrant, Denton and Collin
Counties; and
WHEREAS, analysis of Denton County's fixed site emission ;
sources shown little or no possibility for offset reductions; and
sr WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency has determined
s that controls should be imposed on Denton County even though i
emissions within Denton County are minimal; and
WHEREAS, the Council has concluded that Environmental Pro-
tection Agency's decision to mandate these controls is arbitrary, t,
capricious, and possibly beyond the agency's legal authority and
that the negative effect of these controls would be unreasonable,
grossly disproportionate to Denton County's contribution to the
"t4 problem or to the possible benefits, and not economically
feasible or cost effective; and
WHEREAS, Environmental Protection Agency's decision will
affect not only Denton County, but has implications for other
it ar counties on a state-wide basis which should be of concern to our
+ state government; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONt
r}Mf r SECTION 16
The City Council hereby requests that the Texas Air Control
a~ Board request the Texas Attorney General to take legal action to
resolve the leQal questions raised by Environmental Protection
Agency's decision and to obtain an injunction restraining
ry ? Environmental Protection Agency from imposing these controls
until these questions are settled, by the judicial system if
necessary.
a SECTION It$
3 That It the Texas Air Control Board is unable to obtain
relief through judicial channels, the Council urges that every
effort be made to limit controls to those which bear some
relationship to Environmental Protection Agency's justification
of commutor traffic, rather than those which would affect L
4 r
„a
PAGE 1 a
Y•
4~f
x'
I
Industries that are not and will not contribute to Dallas and
Tarrant Counties' problem,
SECTION III.
That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987.
~,t,, !
RAY EP h , R
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
a '
ATTEST;
p .t,
1 ACTING'CITY SECRETARY
CITY OFDENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA`'ADAMi DRAYOYITCH, CITY ATTORNEY +
r'r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ti W Y+l'
Jib
BYs
t,.
1 ,
f ;
U~4
PAGE 3
Z wb;f{'
x
~4m !i
r
e s ,
iS
~t
FILE
Ya~ ~
S~
II~mo^. 1
,,~nti'R~~ u1r,<
3
O It
,A:
x
R
8.
1+ r
i
i
.y~.---T,
<0.',:_