HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-03-1987
AGENDA
E CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 3 1987
Work Session- of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,.
February 3; 1987, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the !
Municipal Building at which the following Items will be
considered:
5s30 p.m.
1. Receive a report on the Ci'y'a proposed Investment
Policy.
1, L 2, Receive a recommendation regarding the City's position
on a State Implementation Plan to control ozone in
Denton County,
3. Hold a discussion to consider the appointment of
members to the Beautification Task force.
4, Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
• AF
V.A,T,S,
B, Real EatatG Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V,A.T.S,
C, Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
« Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S, (see item ►3 above)
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
` February 3, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the council' Chambers of the
r Municipal Building at which the following items will be
i'. considered:
7:00 p.m,
eti
1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
,nesting of September 16, 1986, and the special call
meeting of September 23, 1986.
k1 .
2. Public Hearings
j
A, 2-1842, Conoider the petition of of The Nelson
Corporation, representing Myers Development
Corporation, requesting an amendment to a planned ;
development and approval of a concept plan, The
property is located south of 1-35E and southeast
of State School Road and is approximately 43,4
acres in the O,W. Walker Survey, Abstract 1330,
a If approved, the amendment would permit the
maximum height of the structures to increase from
2 1/2 to 8 stories and provide for a one parking
;e•, space to 300 square feet of floor space ratio
rather than a one space to 200 square feet
ratio, (The Planning and Zoning Commission has
` no recommendation.)
F `
,
I
e
All N,
use
{
City of Denton City Council Agenda sW
February 31 1987
Page 2
" 3. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
city Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 4.A, 4.B, 4.0. This listing is
provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to
{ discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A, Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid 49692 - Rental Street Construction
Equipment and Operators
( F
2. Bid !9699 - Truck Bodies 6 Crane
3. Bid 49701 - Fiberglass Brackets
4. Bid 49704 - 3 Phase Distribution Transformers
~q S. Bid 49706 - Padmount Switchgear
61 P,O, 477099 - General Electric Co. -
$170752.00
B. Tax refunds
wow 1. Tax refund to Robert W. Owen - $1,111.61
21 Tax refund to Lawyers Title - $613.11
a` Co Plats and Replats
1. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the
Northridge Subdivision, Lots 4-9 and 11-13,
Block 2. (The Planning and zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
I" ~ r ti
Yom'
1`1.::.aatv W "i
r
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 3, 1987
Page 3
4, Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting y
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvementst
providing for the expenditure of funds.,
61 Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and awarding a contract for the
purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or
servicest providing for the expenditure of funds.
C. Consider adoption of of an ordinance providing
for the expenditure of funds for emergency
purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or
services in accordance with the provlsione of
State Law exempting such purchases from
requirements of competitive bids.
D, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
;F request of Teasley Road Associates for annexation
:V of approximately 80.82 acres being part of the
)J+d~ Jame3 Coltart Survey, Abstract 288, and northwest
of new Loop 288, north of Kings Row, and weal of
Farris Road, (A-42)
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
" section 4-32, Article I of Chapter 4, 'Aaimale'
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton,
Texas relating to the return of adopted dogs and
% Cate.
`^r } F, Consider the approval of an ordintnce repealing
urdinance no, 83-04 which established a school
zone on U.S, 380 at the Bethel Christian Academy.
00 Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting
parking on both sides of Avenue D from Eagle
Drive to 235 (The citizens Traffic Safety Support
Commission recommends approval),
H, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
contract with the Texas Mater Development Board
for funding assistance for a water/wastewater
study of Denton County.
w.
I, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
contract with Denton , County for a
water/wastewater study of Denton county.
r
r
is w"`~ieNv'Ak+lnSw:"i..c.M 1Y.9r.,F'tdp,.a 6... : r,,,.». .
1Kk
City of Denton City Council Agenda }
February 3, 1987
Page 4
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
rates for providing electrical services by the
city to its customers.
K. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
rates for providing water services by the City to
its customers.
L. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and the
North Texas Repeater Association for emergency
communications assistance.
s M. Consider adoption of an ordinance calling and
ordering an election to be held in the City of
' Denton, Texas, on April 4, 1987, for the purpose
of electing four Council Members to the City
Council of the City of Denton, Texas for Places
1, 2, 3, and 4t ordering that the punch card
electronic voting system adopted by Denton County
be used, in said electionf providing for voting
places and appointing election officials and
providing for election supplies.
F
5. Resolutions
l9s 7''t , A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to execute railroad licenses under
ara certain circumstances.
r
B, Consider approval of a resolution authorizing
P, submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for
a juvenile police officer.
Co consider approval of a resolution affirming the
City Council's support of the application of Help
Our People Emerge (H.O,P.E,) for Hands Across
America/USA for Africa funding.
D, Consider approval of a resolution by the Council
A: of the City of Denton authorizing participation
in the Section 312 program of the Housing Act of
1964.
9. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
Mayor to execute various contracts and amendments
N % relating to the City's participation in the Texas
Kohabilitation Program.
Y
~ r 1
,VI
V'
VI
r ,yv y4i'Y(<IMUYI~Wn.,.n n.•wAS9., ,w.....•... •Xw.W..WI.a;M.. VV+`Yrr:`4A'°1XY,a .i..... ~~i ~"~l i
3
,
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 3, 1987 h
Page 5 t
i
F. Consider approval of a resolution appointing two
members to the initial board of managers for the
proposed emergency communication district.
o. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
7. New Business
This item
provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
y, 8. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
Be Real Estate
C. Personnel
o
r D. Board Appointments
{ 96
Executive Sessions
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
Be RealT,Estate Under Sec. 2(f)► Art. 6252-17
`J1r
(1) Discussion of lease' agreement with Flow
Hospital.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments
Art 6252-17 V.A.T. Under Sec. 2(g),
C Z R T I F I C A T E
art ~
2 certify that the above notice of meeting was
posted on the
b
on tAht- ulletin boat at the Ci y Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
day of o'clock
'k.
T R 25l5C
(4*
y f r.
w
1
~y, '.~s',~'(6/h.r. WV~H44y((.y~,nMIJIYNSr#q~'.+11^..Sa,<bL•o «;.,.nvu. a..w.«.,.,.__..
,
EMERGENCY ADDENDUM
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
February 3, 1987
7:00 p.m.
' The necessity of this emergency addendum being the urgent
public necessity to consider approval of a resolution endorsing
the Texas War on Crime who will convene February 9, 1987:
1. Consider approval of a resolution endorsing the
Mayor's Criminal Justice Task Force for the Texas
y War on Crime.
C E R T I F I C A T S
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin oVr at the City,}Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of Pb , 1987 at ~ o'clock 1
(a.mi) p.m.
a :b
¢ Y
1
7 ; t ~ 'I I A
Ir
v r!~
1.
rt y f'
a
'i
t ~
R^ 1 1
IL r ~
1 ~ I p
..I A.
FPM r h. ~!y;.. IVA...r•.,.., .,.r,~ri t, 444
A f f kr 'Y
r
it -i-I IT 4
"y AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 3, 1987
Work Session of
February 3, 1987, thet
a city of Denton city Council on Tuesday,
5.3U
Municipal SuiIdinq at which in he Civil Defense Room of the
considered: following items will be
5.30 p.m,
1.
ReceiVe
Policy, a report on the City's Proposed Investment
2, Receive a recommendation regarding the Cit
4
on a State Implementation Plan
Denton county. to control s oonetiin
3, Hold a discussion to
members to the Beautification Task ForceBppointment of
4, Executive Session.
Legal Matters -
b,A,T,S, - Under Sec, 2(e), Art. 6252-17
t B. Real Estate - '
f V,A,T,S. - Under Sec, 2(f), Art, 6252-17
C, Personnel/.Hard Appointments r
Art 6252-17 V,A,T,S, {see item t3nabov ) u, 2(g)'
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City council on Tuesday,
February 3, 19870 at 7100 p,m, in the Council Chambers of the
+ = Municipal Building
` consideredi at which the following items will be
7.00 p.m,
R 1, Consider a
meeting of p8eptemberflbthe minutes of the regular
meeting of September Y3 ' 1986, and the special call
1986,
e 26 Public Hearings
y A. 2-1812, Consider the rOr petition of of The Nelson
terations representing Myers Development
Corporation, rrequesting ah amendment toe canned
4 4 development and approval of a concept plan The
Property is located south of I-35E and southeast
of State School Road and is approximately 13,1
acres in the G,W, Walker Survey# Abstract 1330,
If Approved, the amendment would permit the
maximum height of the structures to Increase from
2 1/2 to 8 stories and
+ space to 300 square feet vofe flfor one rkin
rather than
oors space aratio
ratio a one space to 200 square feet
, (The Planning and Zoning Commission has
` no recommendation,)
I
3 9°~~4H ~^~.~1.~'~F.9~, 2r~?._~k6k.,MrMY..A✓a,. n.,,,a.. , .
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 3, 1987 I
Page 2
1
3. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and I
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff I
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 4.A0 4.8, 4.C). This listing is
provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to
discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance.
;r
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid 19692 - Rental Street Construction
Equipment and Operators
6' " err 2. Bid #9699 - Truck Bodies 6 Crane
3. Bid 19701 - Fiberglass Brackets I1
4. Bid #9704 - 3 Phase Distribution Transformers
5. Bid #9706 - Padmount Switchgear <
6. P.O. 177099 - General Electric Co.
$17,752,00
-
B, Tax refunds
11 Tax refund to Robert W. Owen - $1,111.61 ~
2, Tax refund to Lawyers Title - $613.11
C. Plats and Replats
it Consider approval of preliminary plat of the
Northridge Subdivision, Lots 4-9 and 11-13,
r Block 2. (The Planning and zoning i
commission recommends approval.)
a
s. ~ f i •
J ~
{
is
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 3, 1987
Page 3
4. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bide and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvementsi
providing for the expenditure of funds.
Be Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and awarding a contract for the
purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or
servicesi providing for the expenditure of funds,
C. Consider adoption of of an ordinance providing
for the expenditure of funds for emergency
purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or
services in accordanve with the provisions of
State Law exempting such purchases from
requirements of competitive bids.
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
r time and place for public hearings concerning the
request of Teasley Road Associates for annexation t
s° of approximately 80.82 acres being part of the
dames Coltart Survey, Abstract 288, and northwest
of new Loop 288, north of Kings Row, and west of
r Farrin Road, (A-42)
E, Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
section 4-320 Article 2 of Chapter 4, 'Animals'
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton,
74 Texas relating to the return of adopted dogs and
cats, i
F, Consider the approval of an ordinance repealing f
ordinance no, 83-04 which established a school
at zone on U.S. 380 at the Bethel Christian Academy.
0. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting
k, parking on both sides of Avenue D from Eagle
r, Drive to 135 (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support
~r Commission recommends approval).
r H, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
contract with the Texas Water Development Board j
'ti 1 for funding assistance for a water/wastewater
B ' ,
" study of Denton County
i, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
contract with Denton County for a
water/wastewater study of Denton county.
a j
f
1
! City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 3, 1987
Page 4
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
i rates for providing electrical services by the
City to its customers. +
!
K. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing i
' rates for providing water services by the City to
' its customer(.
L, consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and the
North Texas Repeater Association for emergency
communications assistance.
M. Consider adoption of an ordinance calling and
ordering an election to be held in the City of
Denton, Texas, on April 4, 1987, for the purpose
of electing four Council Members to the City
Council of the City of Denton, Texas for Places
10 2, 3, and 41 ordering that the punch card
electronic voting system adopted by Denton County
'C=; be used in said elections providing for voting
s pieces and appointing election officials and
providing for election supplies,
S. Resolutions
A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to execute railroad licenses under
certain circumstances,
81 Consider approval of a resolution authorizing
` y submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for
a juvenile police officer.
C, Consider approval of a resolution affirming the
f City Council's support of the application of Help
Our People Emerge (H,O.P,E.) for Hands Across
America/USA for Africa funding,
D. Consider approval of a resolution by the Council
of the City of Denton authorizing participation
in the Section 312
1964. program of the Housing Act of
j!` f E. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
Mayor to execute various contracts and amendments
relating to the City's participation in the Texas
Rehabilitation Program,
%
roe. _ ....~,.W .....,-nay»..-.•
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 30 1987
Page 5
F. Consider approval of a resolution appointing two
members to the initial board of manager^ for the
proposed emergency communication district,
6. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
7. New Business
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
8• Official Action on Executive Session Items:
i
A. .egal Matters
B, Real Estate
C. Personnel
3,1 D, Board Appointments
a - L
Executive Session:
A, Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
VAT S
B, Real Estate Under sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A,T.S,
(1) Discussion of lease agreement with Flow I
Hospital,
' C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
5C E R T I F I C A T E
X I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1986 at o'clock
P.m. i
3 CITY SECRETARY 2545C
q 'h I
r o.' I
E
I
t
1
I
v;
t
i
i
-K LL -L
14
j
-FTTE t
i ~
r
d
3 ,
K+ a
r+
EII-JOLL
r~ '
3
R
{
TTIF
E T=
}
i
r S'
a f i'
i SC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
fd
I
1
' : . ' ~ ,~6N3, .~sw.... n...-,-,........ - _ r, _ w .2}1a1,.,i.WYy:SM,Ak+TiEwiurPyvws~+~'1n'',
S"30
DATES February 3, 1967
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOS Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMr Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS PROPOSP: INVESTMENT POLICY
I
SGNMARYs Staff has provided the attached investment policy for Council
review an' comments. The policy is desig:led to satisfy the ,
tr statutory requirement to define and adopt a formal investment
policy.
s BACKGROUND: The proposed policy reflects 8t3ff's opinion on how the
City's portfolio should be manageo. The policy is structured E ,
s to fulfill a hierarchy of concerns ranging from ssfety to
investment yield. You will note that ih provides guidelines
by which the City of Denton will first strive tb protect and
' preserve the capital In its overall portfolio. Secondly, the
a guidelines shall keep the capital liquid enough so the CA
can meet expenditure requirements. The final focus of the
t guidelines is on the yield of the investments.
FISCAL IMPACTt This policy shall have a positive impact on our resources by
' increasing the supervision requirements of our portfolio, r s "
Q
" There is no cost associated with its implementation.
Respect Ily submitteds
to v; Bartell,— Ctt manager
prepared by
Harlan 6o raon
a
Rish"Manage
JI
Sys l~ . ~
Apko s
b Joh a NOtAnd
Director of Financa
BLJiaf
t + Attachment
il291
_ .............-..,rey.n ^1wx4..+tu.,. ..,.v.:rVW ~,NINgY3~'nX~
1
" i
t
t
t
I. Pur ose
This policy shall provide the guidelines by which the
City of Denton will maintain the minimum amount of cash
in its bank accounts to meet daily needs, and to provide
protection for its principal while receiving the highest
" yield possible from investing all temporary excess
` cash, It also satisfies a statutory requirement to
define and adopt a formal Investment policy.
_ II. Scope
a.
A. This investment policy applies to the investment
activities of the City of Denton, excluding the
j, specific funds cited hereafter.
B. This policy shall not ove funds N under separate investmentn programs. ich Sare naed
uch mafunds
! currently include; Employees' Retirement Fund of the
City of Denton; the Firemen's and Policemen's Pension
Funds of the City of Denton; other funds established
{ by the City for deferred employee compensation;
revenue bond reserve funds; and certain private
donations. The City shall and will maintain
a responsibility for these funds to the extent required
by: Federal end State Law; the City Charter; and
donor stipulations.
t
C. Cash equivalent assets of the General Fund, Community
Development Block rirant Fund, Recreation Fund, Crime
Prevention Fund, Airport Grant Fund, Airport Master
Plan Fund, Street Bond Fund 1985, NorthAast Park
Fund, Revenue Sharing Fund, Emily Fowler Library
Fund, Debt Service Fund, Street Improvement Fund,
General
Fund, Water Bond
o4e Sewer nFund, Water Electric Bond dF'und$ Sanitation
Fund
, Landfill Construction Fund, Working Capital
Fund, Defensive Driving Fund, Self-Insurance Fund,
Employee Health Pund, and any other fund of the City
u not specifically excluded in these policy
guidelines. These funds, as well as other funds that
may be created from time to time, shall be
administered in accordance with the provisions of
these policies.
I
i
i
1
1
3
III. Ob ective
A. There are three (3) objectives this Investment
Policy will address. The primary objective of the
' City's investment activity is the preservation of
capital in the overall portfolio. Each investment
transaction shall seek to first ensure that capPital
losses are avoided, whether they be from socurities
' defaults or erosion of market value. The second
objective shall be liquidity and the final objective E
shall be the yield of the investment.
B. To prevent the possibility of loss of resources,
funds shall not be exposed to market price risk,
default risk or be invested in a manner which is
contrary to applicable federal and state regulations.
' C. To enable the City to meet operating requirements
# that might be reasonably anticipated, the City's
investment portfolio will remain sufficiently
liquid. Liquidity shall be achieved by matching
' investment maturities with forecasted cash flow
requirements and by investing in securities with
active secondary markets.
'ax D. It shall be the City's goal, in the area of yield, i
to establish and maintain a portfolio which
regularly exceeds the average rate of return on
three months U.S.
Treasury (3) Bills or the average
t
Federal Reserve Discount rate, whichever is higher.
The first measure of success in this area will be f
the attainment of enough income to offset
inflationary increases. Even though steps will be
taken to obtain this goal, the City's staff shall
constantly be cognizant of risk limitations.
E. All participants in the investment process shell
seek to act responsibly as stewards of public
assets. The Treasurer shall avoid any transactions
that might impair public confidence in the City's
ability to governed effectively. The governing body
recognizes that in diversifying the portfolio,
' occasional measured losses due to market volatility
are inevitable, and must be considered within the
z context of the overall portfolio's investment
return, provided that adequate diversification has
been implemented.
5 ~
J ~
1
i
M .
' R'~swsi. v♦ ° w r. ,r':,,, r; Jty F t. v.:oi .Crr.,w .wY S.u,,....
E
C
:
r
e
IY. Investment Committee
There is hereby created an investment committee
consisting of the City Manager, Director of Finance,
Treasurer, and one member of the City Council. The
investment committee shall meet at least quarterly to
determine general strategies and to monitor results.
Included in its deliberations will be such topics as
economic outlook, portfolio diversification, maturity
structure, potential risk to the City's funds, authorize
brokers and dealers, and the target rate of return on
the investment portfolio. The committee shall establish
its own rules of procedures,
V. Responsibility
A. The management responsibility for the investment i
program is hereby delegated to the Director of
j Finance, who shall establish written procedures for
the operation of the investment program, consistent 1
with this investment policy. Such procedures shall
~t include explicit delegation of authority to the
Individual(s) responsible for investment
transactions. The primary individual who shall be j
involved in investment activities will be the
Treasurer. No persons may engage in investment
transaction except as provided under the terms of
this policy and the procedures established by the
Director of Finance. The Director of Finance shall
be responsible for all transactions undertaken, and
shall establish a system of control to regulate the
µz+ activities of the Treasurer.
%
€ r..
B. The Director of Finance shall submit quarterly an
investment reports to the investment committee, that
summarizes recent market conditions, economic
developments and anticipated investment conditions,
The report shall summarize the Investment strategies
employed in the most recent quarter, describe the
portfolio in terms of investment securities,
maturities, risk characteristics and other
features. The report shall explain the quarter's
r total investment return and compare the return with
budgetary expectations or projections.
I
I
r~
i I
Y
1 j 1
r
r ,
f
l
i
i
C. Within sixty (60) days of the end of the Fiscal
Year, the Director of Finance shall present a
comprehensive annual report ~o the City Council on
the investment program and investment activity. The
annual report shall provide a separate quarterly
comparison of returns and suggestions for
improvements that might be made in the investment
program.
( D. In the event of the absence of the Treasurer, the
authority to invest in maturities beyond six (6)
j months shall be regulated by the controls and
procedures outlined by the Director of Finance.
VI. Investment
_ A. Idle funds of the City of Denton may be invested in:
P' o U.S. Treasury securities maturing in less than
0 three (3) years;
E o Short term obligations of the U.S. Government
agencies which are guaranteed by the full faith
and credit of the United States of America as to
j principal and interest;
' r o Fully insured or collateralized certificates of
deposits at commercial banks;
o Repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S.
r, Treasury Securities;
o Other such securities or obligations approved by
~`k M1 the investment committee.
B. Except for debt service funds, special assessment
funds, bond proceeds and reserve funds, assets of f
the City of Denton shall be invested in instruments
whose maturities do not exceed two (2) years, at the
time of purchase. The General Fund and other
operating funds maturities shall not exceed one (1)
° year, unless a temporary extension of maturities is
approved by the investment committee, idle funds
held in special assessment funds, bond proceeds and
other reserve funds may be invested in maturities
exceeding two (2) years with special approval of the
investment committee. Idle funds held in the Debt
E Service Fund may be invested in maturities not
exceeding thirteen (13) months.
1 v, -
§ ~ f
t Y.,:~,CelM1'•*'^'~~'. e.r,...y„ a,4elt. M. n.a~.s.. y-., c• °a v°,a,^-.:.1AxF SSrY:-1..~^.s-.+hN'n.✓4✓kd,,.;6's iT'4nf Liar
4
1
~1.
T
i
C. It is the policy of the City of Denton to diversify
its investment portfolios. The diversification
` s will protect interest income from the volatility of
interest rates and the avoidance of undue
concentration of assets in a specific maturity
sector; therefore, portfolio maturities shall be
staggered. Securities shall also be selected which
provide for stability of income and reasonable
k liquidity. Diversification strategies shall be
determined and revised periodically by the
investment committee. In establishing specific
! diversification strategies, the two (1) following
general policies and constraints shall apply:
(1.) Risk of market price volatility shall be E
controlled through maturity diversification
such that aggregate price losses on
instruments with maturities exceeding one (1)
' year shall not be greater than coupon
interest, and investment income received from
the balance of the portfolio.
k (2.) The investment committee shall establish
strategies e total and guidelines etha may the be percentage
of th d
in securities other than repurchase
bills, or
agreements;
insured/collaterali ed treasury
certificates of
A,"V - deposit. The investment committee shall
conduct a quarterly review of these
guidelines, and shall evaluate the
probability of market and default risk in
various
deratlonstment sectors as part of its
F.•
s, V11. Selection of Banks and Dealers
A. City Council shall, by ordinance, "select and
designate a banking institution located within the
°r corporate city limits as the depository for the
monies and funds of the City." The bank shall be
selected primarily on "solvency and stability" and
M secondly, on rate of interest available.
B. The Treasurer shall conduct a comprehensive review
' of prospective depositories credit characteristics j
and financial history.
_i
.4
Y,r
I%. N .~FNIw
4.
F
ff
1
C. The bank shall be selected throw h a formalized
bidding process in response to th~ City's request
y for proposal (REP) outlining all services
required. The investment committee shall have the
discretion to determine the time span for rebidding
the banking services contract; however, a two year
period will be the maximum length of time between f
rebidding. +
fi ~l
+ D. Banks and savings and loans associations seeking to I
k. establish eligibility for the City's competitive
r. certificate of deposit purchase program, shall
submit financial statements, evidence of Federal
insurance and other information as required by the
Director of Finance.
R?
' E. The investment committee shall be responsible for I
iq selecting brokers and dealers of government
securities. Their selection shall be among only
primary government securities dealers that report
' directly to the New York Federal Reserve Bank. In
the dealing with City funds, the Treasurer shall
n t co duct business with any ecurittes dea ers
w?th whom or through whom pubic entities ave
sustained losses on investments. To guard against
default possibilities under these conditions, and
to assure diversification of bidders, business with
any one issuer, or investment broker, should be
limited to twenty-five (M) per cent of the total
' portfolio at any point in time. In this way,
bankruptcy, receivership or legal action would not
immobilize the City's ability to meet payroll or
other expenses.
VIII. Principal Protection and Safekeeping V
A. All deposits and investments of City funds other
than direct purchases of U.S. Treasury or U.S.
Agency notes shall be secured by pledged collateral
x with a market value equal to no less than 100
percent of tho deposits or investments less an
amount insured by FDIC or FSLIC. Evidence of V
pledged collateral shall be maintained by the
T
reasurer or a third party financial institution,
Repurchase agreements shall be documented by a
specific agreement noting the collateral pledged in
each agreement. Collateral will be reviewed
monthly to assure the market value of the
I securities pledged equal or exceeds the related
bank balances. The Committee shall request
additional collateral in the event they deem that
their deposits and investments are not sufficiently
protected by the pledged collateral.
. _ s, ..,.,a-, ,r.. rno ..,+a .t,., yTaY".r}'r. W ni Kt•w+
5
~ k
t
p
8. Safekeeping procedures shall be established by the
R Investment committee which clearly define steps for
gaining access to the collateral should the City
determine that the City's funds are in jeopardy,
C. Treasury Bonds, Notes 8 Bills and Government
Agencies securities shall be purchased using the i
I
delivery vs. payment procedure. The securities
^F, shall be delivered to the City's depository bank j
and held by the depository bank (also referred to t
as the "holding bank") on behalf of the City
Safekeeping receipts shall be delivered to the
F: City. The bank records will be reviewed monthly to
assure the notation of the City's ownership of such
securities.
D. Only securities allowed by Section C, Articles
2559-2S99A of the Texas Revised Statutes shall be
eligible to be pledged as collateral. i
L•i
I 4
1 '
rr, ;
t ~
M{P11
t I
e rt
, y 1
i6. ~ i . Ii
T r ~ 21~9p
h; January 29, 1987
a
1
1
y3~ _ wr id:.'4.~• la •.ulr'.A4h'.l ~x1X~v?+
~f
:d••
I F=
k
4
r"
R
i•.
ti
Y,
k~
r 1 '
JI 1
s ~
~ ml
is Y 1 r 'r 7
r
'Y
V ~ ~ 11
1
r ~s e
r
~'w y r
,F J IY•
•i M 1:
%
.
4
i
r CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
y`
Date: January 291 1987
To: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
From: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Development
Subject: Public Meeting of the Texas Air Control Board on Proposed
:r Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) Involving
a Denton County
The approximately three years that I have been working with
Texas Air Control Board through the North Central Texas Council
of Governments have been interesting and educational, but also
F very frustrating.
Basically, the proposed plan for Denton County calls for our area to
1 expend effort and monies to alleviate a problem it did not cause and
could not solve even if Denton County did everything demanded by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
1 r, At'the February 11, 1987 public meeting, I suggest that the City of
Denton's response to the proposed Denton County Plan Include the I
following:
The City of Denton wishes to do all that is reasonable to
;s s provide clean, safe air for its citizens. f
Denton County is not a ma~or generator of volatile organic
compounds (VOC)s, but is In fact a victim.
i
Non-attainment readings in Denton County are caused by
prevailing winds from Tarrant and Dallas Counties.
VOC controls in Denton County will not reduce ozone levels
in Dallas and Tarrant Counties,
r« it does not appear that even if the strictest controls were
instituted in all three counties, attainment could be achieved.
Annual vehicle emission inspection/maintenance (IM programs
could be acceptable in the City of Denton,
However, restrictions on industrial growth in Denton by
requiring new sources of VOC to obtain equivalent emissions
^r reductions from existing sources are totally opposed by the
City as being unfair and putting the area at a severe dis-
advantage in attracting new industries.
ref v
,
r
ON:
w; Memorandum to Mr. Harrell
Page 2
January 29, 1987
~y
u:. k
' if Denton will be required to obtain offsetting emission
controls, it should be able to utilize sites in Tarrant and
' Dallas Counties, the major source of the emissions.
Finally, the City of Denton respectfully requests that the
x'`r questions raised by Jane W. Ojeda in her letter to Jim Myers,
~r t Director of Enforcement Program, Texas Air Control Board, be
answered in detail. (copy attached)
It is expected that ample, very technical material will be presented
' at the February 11, 1987 meeting; if not there, at the later, formal i.
hearing in Austin. i think the city's response should remain on a
policy level.
I am prepared to present the city's position at the February 11,
t :r 1987 local meeting if that is the wishes of the Mayor and Council.
ME Meyer
T~ ab
lr Attachments i Y
P t.t.i, v. - - w
Y w,~
E iEX i X 3 i
n X v Jl
AIP
r
yy y+
1X~
~Y
s ~
a.
~ - .~~1SN.ipff>Y:,,,,. x.,.w.,. .,,..,,.w.r.;.z t?w^.,a.»., ..,-arq-..4 s'+:w. Xh "~'tK•K•!~'~TO.CR.~•~'
k
North Central Texas Council of Governments
I
t' P 0 Drawer COO Arlington, Texas 76005-5888
I
Jim Myers January 23, 1987 j
Director of Enforcement Program
Texas Air Control 8oard
L 6330 Highway 290 East
` Austin, TX 78723 I
+ Dear Mr. Myers:
As you know, the North Central Texas Council of Governments is assisting the i
Y TAC8 in coordinating the participation of local officials in the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for Denton County., I have been in contact
' with Russ 8aier, Les Montogomery and others of the TAC8 staff regarding
questions about the Denton County Issues Paper. Russ referred me to you for
information pertaining to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
regulations and offsets. One of the major concerns expressed by local
governments In Denton County is the need for offsetting emissions and the fear
that Denton County will lose new industry to Dallas, Tarrant or other nearby
counties. They have requested our assistance in clarifying these issues for
them. Would you please answer the following questions regarding these concerns
in a manner presentable to local elected officials?
. ' 1. What 1s the definition of a major new emissions source or modification in
Denton County under existing PSD regulations? Will this definition change
3 due to the current SIP revision even though Oenton County has not been
designated as a non-attainment area?
' I
2. What steps does a major source wanting to locate in Denton County or other I
I
PSD areas have to take to obtain appropriate permits from the TACK?
Al
T . 2. What steps does a minor source wanting to locate in Denton Couunty or other
PSD areas have to take to obtain apropriate permits from the TACB?
3. Are permit requirements (including emission control requirements) any
different for Denton County than for other "unclassified" areas. If so,
yy.. how are they different, and what is the basis for the distinction, since
" Denton County has not been designated as a non-attainment area?
4. What steps do major and minor sources wanting to locate in Dallas or
i,. Tarrant Counties, or other ozone non-attainment areas have to take to
obtain appropriate permits from the TACB?
" 5. Will emissions offsets be a part of the current SIP revision for Denton
count? Does the TACB have an option to include requiring offsets or not as
.
part of the SIP revision?
6. Under what circumstances could offsets from Dallas or Tarrant County be
~t used to staisfy requirements for a major source needing offsets in Denton
county? I enclose a copy of a letter from Jack Divita indicating EPA's
position that such offsets could be allowed on a case by case basis. Local
governments would like to know what the process would be and how it would
compare in cost and time involved to a permit request that did not involve
offsetting across count tines. ,
CenterWnt#wo 8 10 9 Ix NO s D rive Dt11aNFortV,rorth MetroW/640.3300
111
p
{
I
• l
i
I would appreciate a response from you if possible before the Denton County
Public Meetings to be held on February 10 and 11, since these issues will no
doubt be brought up there. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
r•
Sincerely,
t
f~f Jane W. Ofeda, Ph.D.
Environmental Planner II
la
r cc. Ernest Crosby, Chairman, NCTCOG Air Quality Advisory Committee
Ruth Tansey, Denton County Commissioner
`L .Jeff Meyer, City of Denton
Jack Divita, Environmental Protection Agency '
IN I
Les Montgomery TACB
Russ Baler, TA68
4.
rte ~
1 r
J I
5
1
ryif~ri ~ ~ 3.
r~ Y
O
F
ri
y F
1 l4me' f''
i
I;
A
N G
1
I
v,
e .
. .e.w¢.w, eM»F7e "yKM AW
r
r
i
ISSUES PAPER
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISIONS
DEMON COUNT!
INTRODUCTION
,r
The Envirormental Protection Agency (EPA) has called for the
development of State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to
reduce emissions of volatile organic can unda VOC
Po ( ) in Denton
County. These controls are required because ozone levels '
measured at the one Denton County monitor have exceeded the
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Ozone is
formed in the atmosphere when VOCs react with oxygen arri
j nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight.
EPA has required increasingly more stringent ozone control
I strategies over the past 15 years in most major metropolitan
and industrial areas in Texas. Despite past efforts, however,
r ozone levels above the NAAQS continue to be measured. The
most recent SIP revisions were submitted in September, 1985
for Dallas and Tarrant counties. EPA new
controls into adjacent areas. Proposes to extend
< REQUIRBNMS P ON, DENTON COUNT!
? In areas where the ozone standard is exceeded* EPA VOC controls to be implemented todemonstratereo
attainment of the standard or that all reasonable efforts are
being made to reach attainment. The following controls, which
have been considered reasonable in other areas of the state,
are being evaluated for Denton Countyn
- Annual vehicle emission inspection/maintenance (I/M)
programs,
Transportation control measures (TCMs) such as improve-
ments in public transit and reductions in traffic conges-
tion,
Restrictions on industrial growth by requiring now
` `sources of VOC to obtain equivalent emission reds kns
} from existing sourcer;
- Controls on gasoline marketing,
- Controls on degreasing operations,
- Controls on industrial surface coating operations,
Restrictions on the use of cutback asphalt in road
construction,
- Controls on solvent-usage operations (dr
printing, etc.), l+ cleaning,
tr ~
' 3 ,1-
904" ;A,
.
r .
r
If an approvable 5rP revision is not submitted or is not pro-
perly implemented, EPA may promulgate and enforce unilateral
federal control strategies and/or impose sanctions including,
Withholding of federal highway funding in Denton County
(this could be as much as $2 million in FY87 and $13
million in FY88,)
Curtailing of industrial growth involving VOC emissions,
Withholding of federal funds for air pollution control 6
programs (amounts at EPA discretion), i
,j - Withholding of federal funds for sewage treatment
r facilities (not anticipated).
MMSCTATIONS AND DRCISIONS
r
Through circulation of this paper and by conducting public
meetings in Denton county to discuss the issues, the Texas Air
1 Control Board (TACK) staff hopes to solicit public involvement
! in the SIP revision process. As part of this involvement, we
r are seeking comments on the work being conducted and ideas
which may help produce tho most effective and economically
feasible plan for the area.
Comments and suggestions received will be considered in the
development of draft SIP revisions and associated regulation
changes which will be brought to a public hearing in Denton
? County next spring. The concerns and desires of local elected
officials, citizens, and community leaders can influence the
;r scope and nature of these revisions.
F' 0300 NWITORING IN DRNTOII MINTY
In June, 1984, EPA Region 6 notified the TACB that a SIP revi-
sion would be required to address high ozone values measured
at a monitoring site in Denton County. Peak ozone concentra-
tions exceed the NAAOS of 0.12 ppm some two to sixteen days per
year with the highest values reaching 0.17 ppm. This monitor t
9 was originally sited in 1981, five miles north of the Dallas/
Denton county boundary, to satisfy EPA criteria for ozone
monitoring downwind of the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, it
was not intended to be representative of the air quality
affected by sources located in Denton County. In fact, wind
rF trajectory analyses indicate that sources in Denton County may
have contributed to high ozone values on only two of the ten
days with the highest ozone levels recorded (0.16 ppm and
0,13 ppm) in Denton County from 1983 through 1985. Even for
these two days, however, meteorological records indicate that
the air mass had passed over the Dallas/Fort Worth area on
v:
the previous days. Analyses indicate that controls applied in
r Denton County may not change peak ozone concentrations mea-
sured at the Denton County monitoring site, and attainment of I
the ozone standard will be dependent upon emission reductions
F in Dallas and Tatrarii counties.
-2-
01
I
In July, 1984, the TACB requested further clarification of EPA
policy and provided documentation indicating that a SIP revi-
sion for Denton County would be ineffective. EPA, however, 1
maintained its position that a SIP revision was necessary. On
October 4, 1985, the TACB staff submitted a formal request to
EPA that the call for a SIP revision for ozone in Denton
County be rescinded. In May, 1986, EPA notified the Governor
I of its denial of the rescission request. EPA stated that the
pprimary reason for requiring a SIP revision in Denton County
,s not because of locally generated emissionsr rather because
commuter traffic from "Denton County is directly linked to the
nonattainment problems in Dallas and Tarrant counties" and
Denton County "must contribute to the solution." The North
Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTOOG) staff has esti-
mated that commuter traffic from Denton County contributes
" 3.23 of the total vehicle miles traveled in Dallas and Tarrant 1
counties. Therefore, implementation of the vehicle parameter
I/M program in Denton County may reduce VOC emissions by 407
of the 44,868 tons per year (0.91) needed to demonstrate
attainment in the two adjacent urban counties.
STATUS OP TIRE DALLAS AND TARRANT COUNTY SIP RECISIONS
EPA has proposed approval of the regulations included in the
latest SIP revisions for Dallas and Tarrant counties. However,
those controls can not achieve sufficient VOC emission reduc-
tiois to demonstrate attainment of the ozone standard. In
order to satisfy EPA requirements for such circumstances, the
TACB has committed to evaluate additional control options and
to implement all measures considered reasonable. One of the
suggested national strategies is the expansion of VOC controls
implemented in urban counties into surrounding rural counties. i
While no specific requirements have been provided to the TACB,
it is possible that the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, with all
of its adjacent countiesi may ultimately be addressed under
one comprehensive control plan.
DETERMINATION I)1 THE AN UNT OF CONTROL, REWIRED
~.a EPA guidelines specify that the days with the highest ozone
<k, levels recorded during the most recent three-year monitoring
perioi be evaluated to estimate the percentage of VOC emission
reductions required to demonstrate attainment in the area.
_ The reduction percentage must be based on a day when the emis-
sions contributing to the elevated ozone levels are generated '
i. in Denton County only. Preliminary results indicate that VOC
emissions must be reduced by approximately 19-203 in Denton
County in order to demonstrate attainment of the ozone
p standard,
The TACB performed an inventory of VOC sources in Denton County f
for 1985, An evaluation of vehicle travel, using county-
specific information in computer projection models, estimated
6 i
.3-
s.
A- .
3 '
highway emissions to be 4,743 tons/year (T/Y). Other mobile
source emissions from aircraft, boats, trains, and off-highway
vehicles contributed another estimated 1,103 T/Y. Only one
major stationary source was identified, with emissions of
{ 107 T/Y. Combined minor and area source emissions are esti-
mated to be 3,582 T/Y. Therefore, total Denton County VOC
emissions in 1985, from all source categories, were approxi-
mately 9,535 T/Y.
Y
As identified by computer modeling, the 1985 Denton County
base inventory must be reduced by 19-201 or approximately
e 1,860 T/Y (from 9,535 T/Y to approximately 7,675 T/Y) in order
to demonstrate attainment. The following control measures may E
` be expected to reduce VOC emissions as indicatede
Reduction Estimates
Control Measure 1987 1992 1997
Federal Motor Vehicle 837 T/Y 10249 T/Y 1,554 T/Y
Control Program (FMVCP)
l Vehicle Parameter -0- 828 588
Inspection/Maintenance
Program (I/M)
Extension of Regulations
to Denton Countye
Surface Coating -0- 150 150
Degreasing -0- 198 239
Dry Cleaning -0- 130 157
Stage I Vapor Recovery -0- 399 412
Cutback Asphalt -0- 19 19
TOTAL 837 T/Y 2,973 T/Y 3,119 T/Y
J
Additionally, control measures must also compensate for the
estimated increase in area and minor source emissions of
995 T/Y by 1992 and 1,776 tons by 1997 resulting from popula-
tion growth, Therefore, While attainment can be demonstrated
by 1992, continued growth is expected to overshadow potential
emission reductions by 1997s
s
1992 1997
"s u k
Required Reductions 2,855 T/Y 3,636 T/Y
Expected Reductions 2973 T Y -31119, TY
Difference 118 T /Y 517 T/Y
(Excess) (shortfall)
,
-4
yl
.w
s,
i iGidk`.w;.4*'IYNS :r'n,'v'i"Yk ifsrmr Kdu#7~
y
r
y 1,
EPA is considering a national policy regarding several addi-
tional controls which could further reduce VOC emissions in
Denton County if they are implemented- These includes ,
Stage II vapor recovery at gasoline service stations
during vehicle refueling,
on-board carbon cannisters for the control of
evaporative emissions and vehicle refueling, and
Seasonal limitations on the volatility of gasoline
stored or marketed in the metropolitan area. i
i
CONTROL, MMEFITS AND COSTS
Ozone is a pungent, colorless gas Which in high concentrations
may cause respiratory irritation, headaches, and fatigue and
can damage vegetation and cause deterioration in rubber,
fabrics, and other commercially important materials. EPA
established the national standard for ozone at a level which
presumably would protect the most sensitive individuals from
adverse health effects. Research is continuing to document
the health effects of ozone in order to properly assess the
validity of the current ozone standard. t
The traditionally accepted method of reducing ozone by con-
trolling VOC has had a questionable impact on monitored ozone
" levels. Ozone concentrations in Texas and other areas have
' not improved even after the implementation of extensive and
costly VOC control measures.
While no clear correlation to ambient ozone reductions is
apparent, VOC controls may be beneficial in reducing emissions i
k. of materials which cause documented health effects. For exam-
AO~ the vehicle I/M program may help to reduce emissions of
carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulates as well as
carcinogens {1,3-butadiene and benzene), irritants (aldehydes,
acids, hexane, etc.), and other odorous and undesirable sub-
AV stances. In addition, a substantial cost credit may result
from the product recovered as a result of some VOC vapor con-
trol requirements, such as controls on gasoline terminals,
gasoline tank trucks, industrial degreasing operations, and
r other solvent-usage industries.
v'
«{c The TACB staff has estimated the cost of implementing control
a measures Which may be considered for Denton County. The cost
of the atationary source controls was determined to be reason-
able in the development of the previous SIP revisions and has
+"r been adjusted to reflect county-specific information. Vehicle
f3. r/M program costs include approxinately $771,000 in annual
administrative costs and approximately $2,671,000 in repair
lp, coats for individuals who fail the inspection. While the
E44, resultant cost/ton of an 2/M program appears high, the program
will likely be required for EPA approval of the SIP revisions.
i
4}
yy., ee, vd ,..5 ~,:1t~•M ,aS-;a1 $'k+d}~'„l+u ax,r
,s
,
} Control Measure Annual Cost Cost Ton
FMVCP -0- -0-
Parameter I/M Program $3,442,040 $4,157
Extension of Regulationst
. Surface Coating 13,350 89
Degreasing 22,770 115 !
Dry Cleaning 67,080 516
i [ Stage I Vapor Recovery 78,600 197
i{ Cutback Asphalt -0- -0-
TOTAL With Stationary
k; Controls Only $181,800 Average 203
TOTAL With I/M $3,623,800 Average $2,102 k
AGENCIES INVOLVED In DEVELOPING TEE DNNTON ODVl1T! 82P REVIBIONs
a In audition to any control efforts determined to be necessary
by the agency, the TACK responds to EPA requirements, state
' legislative initiatives, and local requests as part of its
program to protect air quality. This includes the development`
of SIP revisions and regulations in accordance with EPA guide-
lines and the coordination of state actions with local offi-
ciale and citizens.
y~ The North Central Texas Council of Governments is the,desig-
nated metropolitan planning organization for the entire Dallas/
Fort Worth area, including Denton County. It assists the TACB
1 in preparing emission inventories, analyzing transportation
controls, conducting various public information activities,
and coordinating the participation of local officials.
The Department of Public Safely (DPS) is responsible for the
implementation and administration of the parameter I/M program
in any area required by the SIP, if the parameter program is
expanded to include Denton County, the DPS would train and
regulate authorized inspectors, monitor and report inspection
results, enforce program requirements, and assist in public
awareness activities.
$ The Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation pro-
vides vehicle travel data to assist in estimating emissions
from vehicles in a county including the number of vehicle
miles traveled, as well ae the mix of vehicles by model year
And vehicle type.
ADDITIONAL INMIMATION
For more detailed information, please contact Mr. Russ gaiar,
Regulation Development Section, Texas Air Control Board, 6330
Highway 290 Last, Austin, Texas 78723, (512) 451-5711, Ext. 2836
j E -6-
rp. ~aYi'!*ai~ l',.*'.T4+a5F!ti.':+~Wµ".•.
rj
i
tr
f '
V1,7
S
.ref'
AY '
A, ` yyt11 f.
II r
F
S W'{
t dra,
Vic!
vq k
c
t
t~ r
yc
i
f~
7
s J
s,f
tq
VI
1
I ell
{ln
r it
a
. M.
C/TYa f DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 7020i / TELEPHONE (NiT) btfa 8307
Office of the city Manager
i ;
M E M O R A N D U M
TO; Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATES January 16, 1987 j
SUBJECT: Potential Names for the Beautification Task Force 3
I have visited with Jeff Meyer about any individuals whom he
feels would be good additions to the Beautification Task Force
to be considered by the council. Jeff provided me with the
v following names of individuals who have expressed an interest
er for
taekt Eorce9ooWe offer sthese
in this subject in oithe ntment s
consideration to app to and
y names only as potential members and we are certainly not
xw~ suggesting their appointment by the Council. ,
Sam Marino
Karen Abernathy
r
Jim Englebrecht
Jo Grimmer
Elizabeth Garrett
Joanne Wheeler
Dr. Narral Landry
' i Randy Boyd
In additions the following individuals are members of the
reat
current Beautification committee underthe Parke tiveior
Department. Council may want to app
p two from this particular committee.
Fred Patterson
Grant Jacobson
Tom Harpool '
5 Terry Blalock
Gertrude Gibson
Mrs. F.W. McKnight
Donna,Ryan
John Cooper
4444,r j", < James Gardenhire
e
oy v. arts
rt City Manager
N jw/2535C
J ' .,,.'w<w,P~Aka w.¢..%W:,~4.«ketx4ur•dY.S!pfyf^v~"7a~111~.i~ .
r fSfiffi
too
S
i, t~, v
I,
1111111111111 Jill it 1 11 11 11''I
r
5lz 1
t
F
AI.
+r jk 1
9~ ti 1~ ' 1~. d5
~ r3
I
~ r ~ ti t
r ~y ct
Y r' t
k " ~ 1
~4f t ,
Fr
k
ITETUT-IM
~!1
y. •I: t
ITEMETI-Q
r~
]TOTOMT
t
u
XI !r
r-Fr
~ilW~ . . ,.:,»w<«tiu5estr~Arw~'NG.W.v4+x''MN+wrw a~~.ooukW - t
F
{
I
Y 1:
,
O!) . I
t CITY COUNCIL Septeaber16,~119865
The Council convened into the work Session On Tuesday, September 16,
I996P at 1t00 P.M. f
TF PRESENTS Mayor Stephenel Mayor Pro Tom AIfordl Council Members- '
Alexander, Hopkins# and Aiddlesperger 1
4. City Manager
ABSENTS Council Members Chew and McAdams
y 1. The Council convened at the corner of Denton Strait and Oak
D etrietfof a walking tour of the proposed Oak-Hickory Historical
The Council convened Into the Work Session on Tuesday, September 16,
1996 at $130 P.M. in the Civil Defense Room,
` PRESENTS Mayor Stephsnii Mayor Pro Tom Alford; Council Members
f.' Alexander, Chew, Hopkins and McAdams
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ASSENTS Council Member Riddltspergor
~ The Council moved item number t ahead In the agenda order.
~5` ' 2• The Council received a report and considered e f
+ recommendation regarding capital Recovery fees.
w { Mr. Roland Laney, Chairman of the Public Utilities Soafd, reported
idea wit toahave a ot
the cs of nawiutilities paid by th edo el The
'
not spread over all the rate payers. oper
ya.
01 Bob Nelson, afractor of Utilities, reported this was a standard
PfOcett. In the tall of 1961, staff had looked for means to finance
new projects, The Public Utilities board had sent a resolution to
the City Council in January of 1915, The range of Costs associated
with these fees was from $1 200 per living unity i.e.
the tine of platting and 600 paid when the building 4600 paid at
` issued, The Council had as ad staff to check with othr cieas
ties and
research +ny legal impacts associated with these fees, The public
Utility Board had recently asked staff to bring their recommendation
back to the City Council. The review of other cities showed that
Argyle charged 1700 to tie-one Plower Mound Charged a pproximately
$2, 00 for water and wastewater Corinth collected #It~00 fee for
tie one tort North based their
of Austin had a 47,000 fee. Bomaaof the eatoo& were cure ntly under
challenge through legal proceedings.
L}
CI4.,nA Member Aiddlespetgor Joined the meeting.
Sob Nelsons Director of Utilities, further fepotted that alternative
y financing could be accomplished with revenue bonds with a
over the next 10 years, This would p+Youf I
money to fund capital improvements, such at nowrfacilities.tttThe
;y Public Utility eased had recommended to go forward and to hits a !f
consultant who spedialited in capital recovery firs as wall as the
i legal ramifications of the fees, The board further recommended that
the City council appoint a citizens committee to revisv the
z { procedures and the test.
Council Member Alexander asked it the funds could be Used on capital
improvements for the utility system only or could these funds be
used fox other uses such as a new city hilt or strtet lights, oto.
Naison responded that staff had only looked at utility issues.
Mr. Wnay reported that the whole
P, woul
r d have to be banns onl b question was whether the coat
Y Y new residents or spread o w r ail the
i ate payers,
i
u::x~,+,.~r,~,:.~y; ,n,'.* i'r,M sal, t..'~ilY»...i.;.....
a
fir" •
sy
9
( 1
Sp
F
4.
i
LI
'fL
.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Keating of September 16, 1986
Page 2
« Council Membe[iipcAdams asked it theme tees would apply only to neli
construction o4 would it include those residents who moved into
Denton and bought older homes.
y. City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported it was becoming Common around'
the state, for municipal governments to adopt come type of recovery
tee.
Ile,
Council Member Alexander stated his fear was that the fee would be
counterproductive to the city's economic development campaign.
1' V
it was the consensus of the City Council to proceed with obtaining
proposals from consultants to perform the study. i
I
The Council returned to the regular agenda order..
16 Council received a report regarding Airport improvement
project.
Bill Angelo, Assistant Director of Public works, reported that the
e P.A.A. had offered a grant of $226,450. The City's portion fin
matching funds) would be ;25,161.
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, reported that the payments
would begin one year after the issue of the certificate of
obligation. The City could pay principle and interest for the first
r« year or could pay interest only.
The Airport Advisory Board felt that now was the time to begin the '
improvements as the improvements could be done so as to only tear up
the Airport one time. They further felt now was a good time to
rsceiVe bids for the construction. The Airport Advisory Board
suggested a $500,000 Certificate of obligation issue.
The consensus of the council was to have this item on the October 7
agenda,
30 The Council received a performance report from the Customer
Service Division - finance Department,
? John McGrane, Director of finance, reported that the turnaround on
collections was now 4S days, which had cat the accounts receivable
in halt, Previous phone calls lost ware 506 and staff was now
answering 951 of the phone calls. Last year dicing the rush, the
,j ,
average watt for cuetomecr in Customer Service we 30-50 minuses.
This year's staff had handled more people with a waiting period of
only 6-15 minutes, The work ceder backlog had been 600 and was now
215. in addition, employee turnover was down and more training was
being done.
40 The Council then adjourned into the Executive Session to
discuss legal matters, coal estate, and personnel/board
appointments. No official action was taken,
t ,
Council then convened into the regular meeting at 7100 p,m. in the
rt Council Chambers,
PRESENT[ Mayor Stephan$$ Mayor Pro Tam Alford) Council Members
Alexander, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams and Riddleaperger
k City Manager, City attorney and city secretary
ABSSNTl None '
16 Mayor Stephens was presented a proclamation for the
Daughters of the American Revolution,
v `s
The proclamation was accepted by me, Norma Oamble,
r,•r..: R' i~.. F'P'M
F'-x a OF
14 1
S
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 160 1986
Page 3
2. The Council received a report on TMPA activities.
Mr. Richard O, Stewart, TMPA Board of Directors, reported that the
board had for six or seven months tried to prepare for refinancing
of revenue bonds, The Board had met on August 14 and approveo -
t.' resolutions authorising the refinancing of the condo and to reduce
the rates to the cities, Bonds in the amount of $92,472,000 would
be reissued on August 26s 27, and 28. The bonds had received AAA j
rating from the National Bank of Australia} who had purchased the
bonds, The annual meeting had been hold on September 11,
r E The following reports had been made:
Over $3.6 million tons of overburden had been moved
t Almost 3 million tons of lignite had been mined
2.6 million net megawatt hours of electricity had been produced
20,000+ mine acres were now under TMPA control
460 acres of mined area had been reclaimed 1
e, 8070774 continuous safe work hours had been made
300 miles of transmission line were currently owned and maintained !
by TMPA
16 electrical substations were currently operated and maintained
150000 items were in inventory
There were 337 full-time employees
886,735 work hours had been completed during the fiscal year
145 compliance reports had been produced
23 permits had been produced and maintained
59,040 fishermen had used the Gibbons Creek Reservoir
444 people had been given tours of the plant
is Stewart further reported that the Board had passed a resolution to
purchase lend which could be reclaimed and sold in the future.
Another resolution had been approved to not replenish the 1 million
> dollar emergency fund if it was not depleted. Also, officers had jJ
! been elected and Mr. Stewart folk honored to have served as the J
president of the Board for two years. One problem area was Comanche I
Peak, The Board wags however, on the offensive and had taken legal
y, action,
Public Bearings
A. The Council was to have held a public hearing on the
Oak-Hickory Historic Toning District, Petition of the Denton ,
+ Historic tandmark Commission requesting a historic landmark district
designation in the West oak/Nest Hickory street area. The
boundaries of the proposed district are as follows:
r. The north side of Oak Street from 610 West oak west to
the intersection of Oak and Fulton streets,
The south side of Oak Street from 609 West oak west to
the intersection of West Oak and Welch streets.
The north side of Hickory street from the intersection
of Hickory and Welch streets to the Intersection of Hickory and j
Williams streets.
i
The east side of Denton Street from the intersection I
of Denton and Oak streets to the intersection of Denton and Pearl E
streets.
The south side of Pearl Street from 607 Pearl west to
i i
the intersection of Pearl and Denton streets.
The property is mote pparticularly described as City of ,
7 Denton block numbers 328, 3290 330s 336, 476s 468 and part of block
"-f This item was removed from the agenda by staff,
v
10,
r '
1
p
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of September 16, 1985
Page 4
B, 'the council held a public hearing on the petition of
Oak Hill Joint venture. Petition of requesting a change in zoning
from the agricultural IA) district to the planned development (PD)
claselfication'And approval of a concept plan on an 00.601 acre
t_' tract located on the South side of East McKinney Street UK 426) "
a roxi-mateiy 3 miles east of Loop 188. The property is further
described as a tract in the Oideon walker Sutvey, Abstract 1330. It
" approved, the planned development will permit the following land
uses
Single family Attached - 13.91 acres
164 units with a density of 11.7 units per acre
Single family Detached - 11.25 acres 1
62 unite on 50000 square foot lots
with a density of 5.51 units per acre
of Single family Detached - 45.9 acres
187 units on 6,000 square foot lots
with a density of 4.09 unite pet acre
Single family Detached - 9.87 acres
17 unite on 7,000 square foot lots
with a density of 1.12 units per sere f-1627
e..
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
r , Mr, Roger Barrette Metroplex Engineering representing Oak Hill Joint
' venture, spoke in favor of the petition stating this was a difficult
piece of property to work with. Mr, Barrett then presented overhead
zt projections of the concept plan. The property would have a density
difficult per work around Several of
family-7
the approximately
easements lwere 11.76
,d and 0 lot lines were included. The planned development also
included single family-6 units and a small park. The pluses in this
an` ! plan were the open space which was 12.04 acres or approximately 151
of the total tract which was three times the amount that the Parke
and Recreation Department would request.
Council Member McAdams stated that there was a difference between t
parka and open space and asked what was the actual usable park apace.
Mr. Barrett responded that some of the open space was in the
a floodplain and the actual park space had not yet been deterained. E
• a,,
tha 4 acres, that the usable recreation
Coijncil not be McAdams larger f n
space might
Charles Switte who was affiliated with the developer, spoke in t
favors stating that due to tLe narrowness of the tract the planned
development would produce wider lots which would still be attractive
lots.
cA ' J No one spoke in opposition.
+ The Mayor closed the public besting,
+t.J
Denise Splvay, 'Jrban Planner, reported that this plan had been well
laid out by Mr. Barrett and the agenda backup material. The parcel
was located in a low intensity area and the planned development '
Y, would not violate the intensity. The plan also provided for the
diversity of land use and lot site, The developer had agreed to k
staff recommendations for changes in the lot else and S acres along
the creek would be dedicated as park land,
M}' 1, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning and approval of a concept plan on an
East McKinney 6treet
80.101 capproximately located 3 miles lest of h Loop aid: 266,
(IM 426) approximately I miles list of Loop 261,
.Y S
,d
1i
4
5
i
a
J6)Ri J* S
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 16, 1986
Page S
r1 The following 9rdinance was presented:
No. 86-350
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,'
TEXAS$ AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 80.8 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST MCKINNEV STREET,
e APPROXIMATELY THREE MILES EAST Of LOOP 288, AS IS MORE
P PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN# TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN
r: ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
b° "PO" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION) PROVIDING
% FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN FOR SAID DIS'TRICTI AND {
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote McAdams "aye," Alexander "eye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "a~a,"
Riddleaperger "aya," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens 'Alford Mo ion
carried unanimously. ,
C. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Metroplex Engineering Corporation requesting a change in Zoning from
the single family (Sr-7 and 51-30) districts to the planned
development classification and approval of a detailed plan,
including the preliminary plat of Westgate Heights, Phase 111, on an
~r. 16.446 acre tract located on the south side of Payne Drive
approximately 2,300 feet wait of Bonnie Brae Street. The property
is more particularly described as a tract in the Francis Batson
k' Survey, Abstract 43. If approved, the planned development will
? permit the following land ueset
Single Family Detached - 4.9 acres
15 units on minimum 101000 square foot lots
v`• with a density of 3 units per acre
Single Family Detached - 13.4 acres
64 units on minimum 7,000 square foot lots
' with a density of 40 units par acre t-1429
Mayor opened the public hearing,
P
Mr, Roger Barrett$ Metroplex Engineering, spoke in favor of tbo
} petition stating that this change was due to market research and the
u{ need for deeper single family-7 lots which would shorten soma o! the
single family-10 lots,
most RiddIesperger asked if any thought had bean given to
Council Me
extending the street to University rather than Payne Drive.
Mr, Barrett responded no....
Me, Robert Gibbons, representing the developer" spoke in favor,
v; + stating that he owned property adjacent to the west (adjacent to
Greenway Estates) and owned three lots on the south side of
Thunderbird, The deveh')er wished to widen the single family-10
lots At the back so that future residents could build swimming pool!.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing. II
Cecil* Carson, Urban Planner, reported this property was adjacent 6o
a single family-10 area which had been pravlousiy toned. In 1975
the developer had asked for a change from Single family-7 to single
family-10, Single family-10 area, the Street to the vast would
rMmain single family-10 bnt would be wider and with leas depth,
"f Singla family-10 aching requires a 30 foot setback and the
C petitioner was requesting a 2S foot setback. However, this would be
v
, ~fr'JfYtH:M wry~'~"
p
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 16, 1986
Page 6
consistent wigh the existing single family-7 homes which were
already in plate. Thunderbird was a deadend street at the rsgoest
of the Greeow3y Estates residents who did not want a thoroughfare.
The ordinance be presented included a completion date of December,
1988.
° 1. The Council considered an adoption of an
if ordinance approving a change in toning and approval of a detailed
plan on an 18.446 acre tract located on the South side of Payne
Drive approximately 2,300 feet west of Bonnie Eras Street. I
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-181
i
' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINAN^.E NO.
69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 18.446 ACRES
+s OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE Of PAYNE DRIVE,
' APPROXIMATELY 2,300 FEET WEST OF BONNIE LRAS STREET, AS IS
j MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN: TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE
IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE PAMILY "SF-7" and
"SP-10" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, '10
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATIONS PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN FOR
SAID DISTRICTS PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT
OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFS AND PROVIDING IDA AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On toll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
"aye," Aiddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
3
'11 D. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Bob Tripp, Trustee, requesting a change in toning from the
f agricultural (A) district to the single family ISP-7) classification i
on a 59.14 acre tract located at the southwest corner of North !
* Locust Street (FM 2164) and Hercules Street. The property is
v further described as a tract in the B.B.B. and C.R.R. Company
Survey, Abstract 186. If approved, the zoning will permit the
development of single family detached units on minimum 7,000 square
foot lots. 9-1631 }
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
I
Mr. Bob Tripp, Trustee, spoke in favor stating that the parcel was
located north of Evers Perk, Across Locust Street to the east were
single family dwellings under construction and a large single family
area had been approved to the west. Mr. Tripp believed that zoning
in this area would help in the planning of the other unzoned parcels.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported this was a low intensity area
adjacent to a planned development which surrounded this property. j
The planned development had used all of the intensity in the area.
_ The parcel was adjacent to a planned development which was under
construction, Single family-7 zoning was compatible with
surround:.S usea and would serve as A good buffer.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
r approving a change in zoning on a 59,14 acre tract located at the
+ + southwest corner of North Locust street IPM 21641 and Hercules
Street.
,e 1
1
- ::ter, r •,<.x
i
°
r
1N. ~
City of Denton City council minutes
Meeting of September 16, 1986
Page 7
n The following Ordinance was presented:
s ~
a: NO. 66-182
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,'
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY S9.149 ACRES
OF LAND OUT OF THE B.B.B. i C.R.A. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
186, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN TO PROVIDE
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION
FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO
SINGLE FAMILY 'SF-7' CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID
PROPERTYI PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF 1,000 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOFt PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSEI
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlespergec "aye," Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye.'
Motion carried unanimously.
E. The Council held a public hearing regarding the
' E 1985-87 Annual Program of Services.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. "
a
Mr. Mitchell Turner, 2118 Stonegate, spoke stating that four things
about the budget concerned him. He was concerned regarding the
amount of tax increase. The newspaper had stated that the increase
r, would be 84 or 104 and both were wrong and misleading. The average
increase on average property was 19% and he felt this was
v, unreasonable. There was also a Problem for senior citizens on fixed
income who had to pay taxes. Mr. Turner stated he felt the old age
:y exemption should be raised from $16,000 to $30,000. It also seemed
that the capital improvements bond issue was getting the "cart
F before the horse." He felt that this money was already included in
the budget. Mr. Turner concluded. by stating there was a need for
industry in Denton and yet it appeared as if the City was making it
more difficult to attract industry because taxes and utilities were
not competitive and were being increased.
Mr. Don Pickens, member of the Human Resources Advisory Committee,
stated he was representing the committee to reassert the need for
r the quality of life in Denton. He asked the council to take each
recommendation for services individually and give each consideration.
t
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that the Human Resources
Advisory Committee had already made these cuts from the budget.
With no one else coming forward to speak, the Mayor closed the
Public hearing.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell stated that he wished to respond to some
' of the comments. Putting the budget together had been a challenge
due to the federal cuts. The proposed budget had been Cut
substantially and it would be a challenge to stay within the budget
during the next year. Regarding the tax increase, the dollar
figures were given to the City by the 'tax Appraisal District. The
F' actual tax rate would remain at 59 centa; however, the effective tax j
rate would be up approximately 104 due to the reappraisal. Further
the City Council had adopted a resolution with the tax rate stating
that the tax eats would go down if the capital improvements bond
issue failed. Regarding industrial development, one of the reasons
the tax rate was 59 cents per $100 evaluation was that these of the
largest employers In the City were tax exempt. However tax rate was
only one factor that a potential industrial prospect would review.
They would also look at the quality of life. Regarding social
services, staff had tried to adopt the same philosophy with these
a budget requests as with other City departments and had tried to
i
i
}
p
y
Y
E
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meting of Septexlber 16, 1986
Page 8
squeeze out the. excess and still provide the services. Staff wee
y recommending t e same level of funding as in the previous budget but
the Human Resources Advisory committee was recommending 13,000 more
dollars.
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to restore the $13,700 fund to
the Human Resources budget and add a like amount to the revenue
column.
E Council Member McAdams asked a procedural question. If the
additional funds were placed in the budget as expenditures how could
the budget be made to balance.
~ I
City Manager Lloyd Harrell responded there were two options: 1.
Council could identify expenditure reductions and reduce the fund
balance or 1. Council could authorize certain fee increases which
were not included in the budget.
Vote on the motion was approved unanimously.
Council Member Alford asked regarding raising the Senior Citizen
a exemption from $16,000 to ;30,000.
Harrell reported that a debate on this issue had been held on the
staff level b t staff had felt this might present a problem due to
the tight budge.
Council Member Hopkins asked if senior citizens were not affected by
the reappraisal.
Z John McGrane, Director of Finance, reported senior citizens would be
.t
affected only for school taxes.
a
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, reported that the tax code provided
r't any changes in exemptions for the elderly must be completed by May 1.
7 Council Member McAdams stated that in a comparison of other cities,
the City of Dallas had laid off employees, cut back on services, and
Y raised taxes. Municipal governments had experienced significant
losses in federal funds and the City of Denton had experienced a
lower level of sales tax collections.
t Council Member Alexander stated he had reviewed the budget very
carefully and felt it was sound and fiscally responsible.
t~ Council Member Hopkins stated all of the council members had -
reviewed the budget as well as received input from citizens, who did
not want any services cut.
Mayor Stephens stated that the budget process had begun in early
May, In June, the Council had given further instructions to the
1'± staff on those programs to be funded and at what level. The Council
had made a conscious effort to trim and cut the budget and felt the
budget as presented was realistic.
1, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving the 1966-87 Annual Program of Services,
r The following ordinance was presented:
f p NO. 96-183
I AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF DENTON,
p TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON OCTOBER Is 1906,
AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 19871 AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
rr Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams e ayes Alexander O aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "eye,"
Riddlesperger aye, chew aye, and mayor Stephens "eye." Motion
c carried unanimously.
j
ri
U
^e
r
r
r
City of Denton city council minutes
Mee9tinng of September 16, 1986
Pae
P. the Council held a public hearing concerning the
! ' 1 funding of newistreet name signs. j
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor. j
No onespoke in opposition.
i
The Mayor closed the public hearing, i
1. Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton,
Texas, to provide for the cost of furnishing and installing street
name algns.
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, stated that staff had been
trying to talk to developers, etc. about a requirement for the
developer to take care of the installation of street name signs at
the time cf construction. The City of Denton had spent
approximately $20,000 during the last fiscal year installing these
V signs.
1
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-181
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A Of THE CODE Or ORDINANCES
OP THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASO TO PROVIDE FOR THE COST OF
FURNISHING AND INSTALLING STREET NAME SIGNSI AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
Riddlespergei 'ayeChewa*aye,"sand"Mayors Stephens""ay~"d Motion
v carried unanimously.
variances
A. The Council considered the petition of Harry T. Riney
for a variance or special exception of Article /.0T of the City of
Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations which
establishes certain minimus capacities or gallon per minute water
flow requirements tot fire protection purposes for all developments
prior to connection to the city water system. Additional
development is proposed on commercial (C1 property located at $10
yti South Elm. V-31.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported the history of this property
for the Council's information. staff agreed that the City did have
a responsibility to upgrade the existing water lines in the area.
r
t Council Member Riddlespergei asked if Mr. Riney could require people
to pay to tie on to the line after he had installed it.
1 Ellison responded, M.. Riney could cnly recoup his cost if there
were new construction or development.
i
Stephen Reeves, Attorney representing Mr. Riney* reported that the
plat for Mr. Riney's lot had been destroyed in the county Courthouse
fire. Mr. Riney had been told that he would need to replet the
a property. 'During the replatting process problems had been brought
=1 up by. staff regarding drainage and topography.. They had been
? informed for the first time in May that there night be water flow
problems. The water flow was for fire protection) however, the
a wilding would be all metal on a concrete slab. 2n June, the Public
utility Board had recommended that the variance be granted. In
August, his client welt before the Planning and =owing Commission
t a and was told it would take #11,000 to extend the lines to a $70,000 l
building. Hit client had already spent $10,000 trying to replat the
v ,
i
.a .x3.9.. _
n
r.!' F
IA-
4 .
k
City of Denton city council minutes
meeting of September 160 1986
i 1 Page 10
` Property. It Mould therefore cost $51,000 to extend the line to a
1 $700000 buildiAq. If the plat had not been burned, Mr. Riney would
not have this Problem.
Riddlesperger motion, C` . +econd to grant the variance.
Council Member McAdams stated the issue was who would pay--the
developer or the City rate payers.
Motion to grant the variance carried 6-1 with Council Member McAdams
casting the nay vote.
S. Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda Item A.1 (P.O. 19647 - Water Meters) was removed by
F staff.
R1ddlesPer9er Motion,
Hopkins
aecon d
, to approve the consent agenda
with the exception of Purchase Order 19647. Motion car
rried
" unanimously. ~
A. Bids and Purchase Orderer
(REMOVED BY 1. Purchase order 1 9647 - Water Meters
'I STAFF)
2. Bid 1 74967 - Advanced Control Systems -
$179.274.00
3. Bid f 75002 - AO-Chem Equipment Co., Inc.
$12,000.00
a. Plate and Replate:
r 1. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the New
t•n _ Place Addition, Block A. (The Planning and
toning Commission recommends approval.!
xi 2. Consider approval of preliminary and final replat
of the Owsley Park Addition, Lot lOR, Block 9. !4
IThe Planning and toning Commission recommends
approval.) E
C. Contracts: ~~s
1. Consider an. annual software maintenance ' contract
her;' for $11,675 with American Management Systems for
financial system known as 'LGPS' and associated
sub-systems. {Data Processing Advisory Board
recommends approval.)
r 2. Con:011 ider an annual software maintenance contract
for 20,000 with TIES Systems, INC. for
Pay/Personnel system known as 'EFB' and
{ associated tax modules, (Data Processing Advisory
,u Board recommends approval.)
6. Ordinances
A. The council was to consider adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive aids and providing for the award of contracts )
for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. !
This item was removed from the agenda by star!.
9. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
providing for the expenditure of funds tot emergency purchases of
sa, ! materials, equipment, supplies or Services in Accordance with the
s ~1 provislolse of state law exempting much purahaseslfrom requirements
of competitive bids.
j
T,c•
f City of Denton City Council Minutes
Keating of September 16, 1986
Page 11
The following grdinance was presented:
i
NO. 86-185
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A-
CONTRACT FOR THE PUBLIC WORICS OR IMPROVEMENTSI PROVIDING
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE# AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
! % Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On toll call
vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddleeperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance i
adopting the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Building Code with
amendments.
y Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, reported that staff was
recommending the adoption of the code with the exceptions which were
noted in the ordinance in the backup material. Svehla then read
u each of the exceptions from the ordinance.
The following ordinance wao presented:
' NO. 86-186
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES j
r '
BUILDING ~CODIs 19S TEXAS TO PROVIDE FOR ADOPIJON OF THE
OF THE UNIFORM CITY OF
AMENDMENTS THERETO[ PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM
Pt AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATION THEREOPI PROVIDING FOR A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSBI PROVIDING FOR A REPEALER CLAUSE[ AND
y PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
i McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
F "aye," Riddleaperger "ayChew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
r Motion carried unanimously.
D. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
altering the speed limit on F.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane) between Dallas
Drive and Ryan Road.
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, stated that this had been a
d concern of the City Council when the Sam Houston Elementary School
had been bulit. This ordinance would reduce the speed limit.
re The following ordinance was presenteds
5
NO. 86-187
AN ORDINANCE ALTERING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
ESTABLISHED FOR VEHICLES UNDER THE PROVISIONS Of SECTION
169(b) Of ARTICLE 6701d0 VEANONIS TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES,
UPON PORTIONS - OF P.K. HIGHWAY NO, 21810 WITHIN THE
CORPORATE LIMITS Of THE CITY OF DENTONO AS SET OUT IN THIS
OADINANCE: AND PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED
wa $200.00 FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE AND DECLARING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
r , Riddlesperger motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On
` roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander aye," Hopkins "aya0"
Alford "eye," Riddlespetger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens j
'w "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
EtR E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving the Mutual Aid Agreement between the Denton State School i
and the City of Denton.
4
-rT7 . r
k.
I
4IV
7
1 =
1A -
L t'
City of Dentor City Council Minutes
Meeting of Eaytember 16, 1986
Page ll
f ^ Rick Svehla, issistant City Manager, reported that this ordinance
Would.formalixb a "gentleman's agreement." In case of a disaster,
i` the City would assist the State school or the State School would
f " assist the City. Whoever requested the help would assume the.
liability. E
The following ordinance was presented: i
r NO. 86-188
a. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT SE'TWEEN THE i
CITY OF DENTON AND THE DENTON STATE SCHOOL FOR MUTUAL E
ASSISTANCE DURING TIMES OF CATASTROPHIC EVENTS OR
DISASTERS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
G
Fr Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins 'aye," Alford E
_ 'ayeRiddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." k
motion carried unanimously.
rib F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
r` approving a contract with the County Health Department for fiscal
r year 1986-87.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that this item had been
discussed in detail at the last City Council Meeting.
K The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 86-189
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
y3j BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DENTON COUNTY FOR HEALTH
d , SERVICES, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ti
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
Vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "ayeHopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
a. Riddlesperger "eye," Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
i carried unanimously.
0. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
dealing with one-way traffic on Highland Street.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that this item had been €
discussed at the last Council Meeting.
.1 Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager reported the staff had been
It asked to look at the City standards and assess the need for a signal
on Highland Street. Traffic flow on this street did not meet any of
the City standards.
Mr. Eric Jackson, NTSU Chief of Police, stated they had made this
request to the city several months ago. Both ends of Highland
Street were two way, but the center portion which ran through the
campus Vas one way. Adoption of this ordinance would facilitate the
safety of the faculty and staff on campus.
=j Mayor Stephens stated the question was how do you get out o!
campus. It appeared that this ordinance would funnel the traffic
from parking lot IS onto Avenue C or the pedestrian area.
The following ordinance was presented:
Y.
NO. 86-190
" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASt PROVIDING FOR
x. ONE-WAY T'AAFFIC'WEST BOUND ON HIGHLAND STREET FROM WELCH
STREET TO AVENUE A AND ON HIGHLAND STREET FROM AVENUE O TO
AVENUE Ei PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
$200.00 FOR VIOLATIONS TRER90PI AND PROVIDING FOR AN
1 EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
t`
t
i
i
cityiofng of SeptemberC16,c1956inutes
Page 13
i Riddlesperger potion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
+ call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford
{ "ay," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew 'nay," and Mayor Stephens "nay."
e hew and mayor Stephens,
Motion carried 5-1 with Council Member C
j casting the nay votes.
' H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accep[ing the bid of Arthur J. Gallagher i Co., for cer[sin
insurance coverage.
Harlan Jefferson, Administrative Assistant, reported that the City
had been contracting with Gallagher for major insurance needs since
1981. This year, the City had requested bids and nad received five lj
with only one being complete. Staff was recommending to accept the `
bid of Arthur J. Gallagher i Co. E(
The following ordinance was presented:
f
NO. 66-191
A.
' AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE 81D OF ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER i
COMPANY FOR CERTAIN INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR THE CITY Of
` DENTON) AUTHORISING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR: AND
i PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
A McAdams motion, Chew second to "adopt he ordinan
"a ce. on toll call
~ Vote, McAdams aye, Alexander ays, Hopkins
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "eye." Motion
carried unanimously.
' t I. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending the 1985-86 budget. 3
=k c , City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported this was a housekeeping item.
• John KcGrane, Director of finance, reported that this item as well
z+f„,, Agenda Item 7.A were year-end adjustments.
s ay The following ordinance was presentedi
r" N0. 86-192
" AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1965-66 BUDGET OF THE CITY Of
i DENTON TEXAS BY APPROPRIATING THE SUM OF ONE MILLION ONE
i
HUNDRED AND 91087Y-TWO THOUSAND. AND ONE HUNDRED AND
h y EIGHTY-TWO DOLLARS 541,162,162{ FROM REVENUES, AND {
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I
Alexander motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call JI
c vote, C!Adams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye,"
i Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "ays," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously,
T. Resolutions
r~..
ry, M _ A. The Connell considered approval. of a resolution ,
approving yearend budget adjustments for FY 196S-86. j
1 i
John MCGtane, Director of Finance, reported this was a year-end `
housekeeping item. This would amend the budget, but not increase
r any dollar figures. Funds were simply being moved from one
department to another.
,r
The following resolution was presented: !
i
L
, , v, 1
T
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 16, 1986
Page 11
r
R E S O L U T I O N ,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, THATS
SECTION I.
The budget adjustments, as indicated on Exhibit A, attached
I
w hereto and includcd by reference herein, for the fiscal year 1985-86
are hereby, in all things, approved and ratified,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of September, 1986,
1 j
i
Y STEPHEN S, MAYOR
' ATTESTS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
CHARLOTTE AL,. N, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM=
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i
BYS
McAdams motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved".ayeOn
roll call vote, McAdams Alexander "aye,"
iq;
Hopkins
1 Alford "aye, Riddleaperger aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens
1 ;
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
8. The Council considered approval of a resolution
` authorizing the City Manager to submit to the Department of Housing
i and Urban Development an amendment to the Final Statement of
Objectives and Projected Uae of Funds:
n ' 1' Elizabeth Evans, CDBG Coordinator reted that " amendment to the final statement which hadrbeen forwar ed sto THUD is
June.
The following resolution was presentedS
R EBOLUTI ON
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORISING THE CITY
" MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPAATMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
` DEVELOPMENT A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF
FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFtCATIONB, AS AUTHORISED AND REQUIRED BY
THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1971, AS AMENDED,
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, to concerned with the
development of viable urban communities, including decent houeing> a
'i suitable living environment and expanded economic opportanitiesi and
WHEREAS, the City Of Denton, Texaso has a apeolal concern il
for persons of low and moderate incomet and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, as an entitlement City,
has prepared, through a elttZea participation process a
ofi15S7Rfaiteafirst Yeax'entltlement funds in she app program for
v 1 ! roxlmate amount
l WHEREASr the public hearing will have been held in
accordance with the laws and
s
WHL>REAS, the Act requires an application and appropriate
certification) NOW, THEREFORE,
E
.
a
.
p i
~a°
AA,
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of September 16, 1986
Page 15
f^ ~
BE IT RESOLVEDit THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, THAT:
1
SECTION I.
The City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, authorizes
the City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of Housing end
E, Urban Development a grant application and appropriate assurances for
: entitlement funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974, as amended.
SECTION It
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
authorizes the Director of Planning and Community Development to
t handle all fiscal and administrative matters related to the
application, the Housing Assistance Plan and the assurances.
SECTION 111.
!j This this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and
after its passage.
SECTION IV.
That the City Secretary is hereby authorized to furnish
copies of this Resolution to all interested parties.
< '
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of September, 1986.
pp RAY STEPHEN SO TOR
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
h r~ ATTESTS
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOViTCH, CITY ATTORNEY
{ { CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
BY:
" !McAdams motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Alford "aye," Riddlesperger 'eye," Chew 'aye," and Mayor Stephens
aye. Motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered approval of a resolution
,f appointing a Municipal Judge and authorising the Mayor to Sign as
employment agreement with the judge.
i
' The following resolution was presented:
A ES0L UT ION
WHEREAS, Section 6.03 of the Charter of the City of Denton
authorizes the City Council to appoint a City Judge to preside over
the Municipal Court: and
% WHEREAS, the Council is desirous of making such appointment:
r
ti NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of DENTON:
5
i
Nome
City of Denton City Coanoil Minutes
1 Meeting of September 16, 1986
{j Page 16
~ ~ SECTIOp t, i
That Sandra H. White is hereby appointed City Judge the
' City of Denton; Texas, effective octobar 1, of 198b.
SECTION Jr.
That the Mayor to hereby authorized to execute a letter of the City Judgemrelativeeto the terms of Dheroemploy ens r a copy of which its
4
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION III,
This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and Approval.
1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of September, 1986.
e
Ft.
RAY ST91JENS, Y R
$ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
' ATTESTS
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
} CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
z
Y BYs
f Chew motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved with an
amendment for a_six-month review in March, 1987 and October, 1987
and each October thereafter. "On roll cell vote, McAdams "i e " 11 L
a. 1 A1exandor~aye," Hopkins aye, Alford 'eye,' Riddlesperger "eye,"
Chew a e/ and Mayor Stephens "aye, Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered approval of a resolution
accepting a grant in aid from the Federal Aviation Administration.
n J The following resolution was presentedt
R E S O L U O
i
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has submitted to the federal
Aviation Administration an application for federa, Assistance dated
September 90 1916 for a grant of Federal funds for a
development of the Denton Municipal Airport, and project for
i. i WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has approved a
project for development of the Airport consisting of the
" construction of an aircraft parking apron, cOnetruellon and marking
of a connecting taxiways and construction of a heltpad) and
~ .t
WHE.REASO the federal Aviation Administration has submitted
to the City of Denton a Grant Offer in the amount of TWO Huodred
Twenty-six Thousand Four Hundred fifty and. No/100. (1116,45D.00)
Zr 't
Dollars for the construction of such improvements! NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF DENTON!
i
1
%
J i
j
t
City of Denton city Council Minutes
Meeting of September 16, 1956
Page 17
E
' i SECTI~N I.
,
That the City of Denton hereby accepts the Grant Offer end
agrees to comply with all of the assurances and conditions contained
in the Grant Application and the Grant Offer, and Lhe City Manager=
of the City of Denton or his designee is hereby authorized to i
f execute such Agreements.
f, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of September, 1986, E~
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
6
ATTESTr
" t
AR TTE ALLEN, C Tr SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL YORMr
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
r• CITY Of DENTON, T 0AS
f ~
"r Chew motion, McAdams second that the resolution be approved. On
+i ? roll cell Vote, McAdams "Aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins 'pheaa
Alford "aye," Riddlespefger aye," Chew "a " f
aye,* !
i "aye." Motion carried unanimously. ye and mayor Ste
i t} 5 The following miscellaneous matters were received from the
.J City Manager.
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that the Denton Record-Chronicle
had agreed to provide space in the newspaper for a weekly article
14
from City Hall. Responsibility for writing the article would rotate
between staff, City Council Members, and the Mayor. Me, Harrell
asked the Council Members to please let him know if they had a
Y. preference on topics, Mr. Harrell further reported that the trip to
" Austin for October 10 was still Onr however, staff did not know what
time the testimony would be held or if anyone from the City would be
allowed to speak.
% i 9. New Business
The following items of new business were suggested by
Council Members for future agendas.
Mayor Stepneis stated that work needqd to begin on the hiring of a
prosecuting attorney,
ati i
lo. The Council adjourned into Executive session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel/board appointments,
11. No official action was taken on Executive Session items,
e Alexander motion, Hopkins second to aAjourn the meeting.
r
r ~
,
t,.+
a~
I
City of Denton City Council minutes
` meeting cf September 16, 1966
Page 16
E
;
J With no furthel,items of business, the meeting was adjourned at gm
I p.m.
Ray Stephens
Mayo[ j
.r Icy 5d
Charlotte Allen
k
City secretary
t4
A Y
1
n,
I
Pry ~ a
v "
{ r
4 ~
t
la,
r;
~ r
f
Rx 0470e k
V
n
} _ ,..zn rx.. ..,.ay w.e. ✓i: hf.. rY `W s!. .nb
4
k r
W
f " City Council Minutes
September 23, 1906
The Council convened into the Special Called ■aetiag at 5103 p.m. in
the Council Chambers.
PRESENT$ Mayor Stopheasi Mayor Pro TOR Alfor4l Council Masbate
Al is dart McAdams and Riddleaperlar
i
ABSENTS Council Member Ropktns had stepp4d out of the coos
Council Member Cow van delayed due to business
1. The Council considered Eeantio` approval to the at Noon
Ltoas Club to display a benoer aceoas public $treat$.
y.k. ltddlasp4rger sotlon, Alexander second to Scott the approval.
Motion carried unanimously.
S~ 2. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service
plan l4etituting anmerstion proceedings for approxiaataly 23.6120
acres of land being part of the Gideon Valker Survey, Abstract No.
l3JO, ■nd beginning adjacent and north of Edwards load approxiaately
` .S mile east of Maybill load and approximately .S mile vest of
Swisher Road. (A-W I
t The following ordinance was presenteds
)k( N0. 66-
r j AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT Of LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
r ADJACENT TO THE CITY Of DEN?ON, TEXAS! BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL Of LAND CONSISTING Of APPROXIMATELY 23.6120
ACMES Of LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY Of
DEMON, STATE Of TEXAS AND BEING PART OP THE GIDEON WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 140. . 1330, DENTON COUNTY, TEXASI
CLASSIOYINU TAR SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY!
AND DECLAAING AN E►PECTIVE DATE.
s~
s 6 - Tory** 0owseo, Plenatag Intern, reported that staff had nothtal new {
to add.
Cc uneII dember Hopklas 101444 the static.
Alaxander motion, Riddlasperler second to adopt the ordinance., On
c roll call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins 'eye
s Alford 'ay4,• Elddlaspe y sr "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye.' Kotton
Cortiad uta 60sly.
3. The Council convened into the Executive Boost** to discuss
legal setters, Coal estate, and personnel/board appointments,
4g i' a,l lalstdial real estate, Council Mather Rtddlesperlar reported that
the informal committed for flow Hospital had not twice colardial the
transfer. The County's :ad hospital's attorneys had bass present at
the aestied, The final asroamest/costratt and dead were is the
final stases of preparstlo- and was expected to be coarlsted to the
r tl. east week or so. Progresr so being made,
Council Menbat Char joined the meeting.
The Council that eenwsad Into the E:etntive Beastaa is the. City ;
daaagar'a Coofarosee Rae■ to disease legal matters, real estate, and
personnel/board appolataosts, go official action was taken,
With no further !tees of business, the meeting was adjeutned.
44
RAY STEtHENS, WOR
t' ~k,~ 2389C
i
I Tay Y .
I
i
i
1
i
E
i
1
r`
(rf
s..
• d ~9.
f f.
I
1 Rh:
{ 1
=ILI
I I e e
-T-1 T TT
Y ;
( '11
lot'
~k ( I5 r
Ir8:1, ~ r
x'
k1
+ }d
+ f
w
s
le i
'r ~t ` r , r i - -~..v,,.y.~p~P.,., - _ (ernvra+Fw _ .d.•...y-~
DATR- 02/03/87
CITY COUNCIL RgPORT PORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
f PROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HBARING Z-1842
RBCOlQS NDATION: j
The Planning and Zoning Commission made no recommendation at its
November 12, 1986 meeting because of a tie vote (3 to 3).
BUMRARYS
This is a request for an amendment to a 75 planned development. The r
planned development is part of a 725 acre development located south
of I-35 in Denton and Corinth.
. The section
of the planned
development abutting I-35 permits single family, cluster housing,
apartments, and commercial land uses.
E The original planned development was submitted for public hearing
before the City Council in 1985 but due to technical complications
the ordinance was not adopted until June of 1986. The technical
questions revolved around the format in which the development
information was submitted. The staff had submitted the 43.4 acre
section of the planned development to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council as a commercial land use with a 2 1/2
pj story height limit. The petitioner assured the request was a
s. cumulative planned development" not just in land use but also in
development standards. The recommendation by the staff to the
Comission and the Commission recommendation to 4.ouncil was based on
# the standard being 2 1/2 stories for the commercial area. The
petitioner had submitted an office area for zoning in Corinth and
felt that since Denton's Zoning Ordinance allows office use in a
commercial zoning district then the same should be true in this
placated development.
J The petitioner is requesting an amendment to allow an eight story
structure with a 1 to 300 parking ratio on the 43.4 acre tract.
The parking ratio would be in line with the requirements for an
office land use but the planned development allows coaseroial land
3 " urea. The petitioner had suggested one ratio for the commercial
uses and one ratio for the office uses but this would be difficult
to administer because parking would have to be determined as space
y is leased or sold.
i
f
' ~.v.Stl..'..g . fN~• !n'+'«; 1.n,'y4k2 +MW:n+,,vaw.
1
3
i City Cc .1 Report Format (2-1842)
S February 3, 1987
Page 2
BACKGROUND (continued)%
Three members of the Commission felt that the request would not be
compatible with the adjacent land uses and would not be aesthetically
acceptable. One Commissioner also stated if the site was better
suited for office uses then the land use should be reduced to office
because a coasserctal area requires more traffic access than this
property will have in the future. Another Commissioner stated if
r the floor area ratio was the same the height was not a problem.
PROGRM, DBPARTMBNTS OR GROUPS AFFBCTHD:
! All departments involved in the development process. Three (3)
property owners within 200 feet were notified.
rISCAL IMPACT:
No impact can be determined at this time.
,
Respect y submitted:
L 1
Preparerd, bye City eager
(
Cecile Carson i
Urban Planner
P,.
App v f
" r V,s
"r t 1 Jeff Mey
Director of Planning
and Develops>ent
y
P}
4 a y ~
"
~ Y.
t
9 . ,
t
1816e ,
r
S 6
1 °
1
rat
p r
i -`t
!
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
# To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1842 Meeting Date: February 3, 1987
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: The Nelson Corporation
5999 Summerside, Suite 202
Dallas, TX 75252
' Status of Applicant: Planner
Requested Action: Amendment to a planned development
and approval of a concept plan. The
amendment would permit an increase in
z the height from 2 1/2 to 8 stories
and provide for a one parking space
to 300 square feet of floor area
rather than a one space to 200 square
feet ratio. i
Location and Size. An approximately 43.4 acre tract
southh of I-35 and southeast of State r
School !toad.
' Ir Surrounding Land Use
and
Zoning: North - Agricultural, commercial,
residential
j
` South - Planned development,
residential
East - Planned development,
agricultural
West - Planned development,
residential, commercial
k; Denton Development Guide: Moderate intensity area
p441
SPECIAL INFORMATION
I AI
` r Transportation:
Property has frontage on I.35 service
M road.` A traffic study has been sub-
mitted and reviewed for the planned
development. The purpose of the stud
'A
1^S
Y
/ry,~(I~OILY9 i'MWYWiMgMY~I`M 1. ~yiI VY, a.
. 1!! ~^^•^In 44"Y.µ`l+Aj.NM1Ai.fV:MWx. +..v u.'xiu . ~ I:.. a...
}
(Case Z-1842)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
was to verify the impact of the 725
acre development and this amendment
on the transportation system. The
study indicates that additional
review will be necessary as the ;
project develops. Conditions about
the transportation systen have been I
added to the recommendations based
on the study submitted after the I
Commission meeting.
Utilities: An existing 14 inch water line is
located along the project frontage
on the service road. An existing
sewer line is located along the west
` boundary of the project and a lift
i station is located south of the
tract. The exact line to provide
sanitary sewer service from the City
of Denton will be indicated on the
detailed plan.
Drainage: Drainage is an important factor.
A portion of the property is in the
`a floodplain. Detention should be used
for drainage across I-35E to the east
g` to negate the effects of this devel-
opment.
x
HISTORY
rr ; '
A panned development permitting single family, cluster homes,
apartments, and commercial land use was approved earlier this
' yyear. The 75 acres is part of a 715 acre development located
in Denton and Corinth
When the toning request was submitted to the City Council for
' public hearing, the recommendation included specific standards
and requirements for each section of the planned development and
that information was taken directly from the petitioners' toning
E submittal. The minutes of the City Council meeting of January
~,w5 150 198S indicate that the Council recommendation was based on
the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation, and the
minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission of December 12,
1984 indicate that the commission recommendation was based on
; ? ,he staff recommendation and conditions. The petitioners claim
nat the commercial area requirements should be consistent with
e office area requirements because of a statement in their
~1 h
Lt
t I . t
w .
I
. y'
V
r
f it
}s°'
f
irk - - . ♦ _ ~
(Case Z-1842)
Page Three
HISTORY (continued)
submittal that the land uses are cumulative in this planned
development, specifically permitting a greater height than the
2 1/2 stories described in the commercial section. HoweVer, no
office area was recommended as a part of the development in the
City of Denton; therefore, no standards were considered.
The Legal Department and Planning and Development Department
reviewed the recommendations and concluded that the height
requirements and standards allowing a 2 1/2 story structure are
the requirements considered by the Council. According to the
Legal Department, if an increase in the height requirement or
variance of other standards that increases tho intensity of the
commercial area was to be requested, then the item must be re-
submitted for public notification and hearing before the Plan- i.
ping and Zoning Commission and City Council.
The ordinance was adopted in June of 1986 with the height
limitation of 2 1/2 stories and the petitioners are now
requesting an amendment to increase the standard.
ANALYSIS
The property is located in a moderate intensity area currently
r over the intensity standard. the intensity was based on acreage
r- because no specific floor area, only a proposed floor area
7 -
ratio, was provided during the original request; however, this
proposal includes a maximum of 109900SO4 square feet. According
' to the petitioner this is the amount allowed by the present
'19 toning and the intensity would not be affected.
As described in the history section the petitioner disagreed
' with the staff on the manner in which the standards and regu-
{ lattuns were submitted. The petitioner claimed the planned
development had a cumulative nature and that the office stan-
dards submitted for other sections outside Denton applied to
the commercial area. Therefore if an office use was proposed,
then the height requirement could be considerably more than
2 1/2 stories. The concept presented numerous problems from
i
an administrative standpoint in trying to determine whether a
building was commercial with 2 1/2 stories, office with more I i
MS+;. stories or some mix of the two land uses with a question about
how many stories where permitted. 1
The amendment would allow a stories without regard to the
-a specific land use. In addition, the parking ratio Is being
altered to provide one standard to cover any land use proposed
rather than attempting to determine the parking allocation as
space was leased or sold. The ratio of 1 to 300 is more closely
related to office land uses, but could present a problem if the
property develops as commercial.
-
(Case Z-1842)
Page Pour
i
RECOMMENDATION
i
The Commission made no recommendation on Z-1842 because of a
3 to 3 tie vote on motions to approve and deny the request.
A traffic study of this area was extremely important to
determine the impact of this large development on the trans-
portation system; however, as development continues in the
;y area, additional data will be necessary.
• I
Staff recommends that the following conditions be added if the
request is approved;
{ 1. No building permits will be issued after December 31, 1988
unless 13.31 of the funding for the required signalization
-,E of State School Road and 1-3S service road, as determined
by the City Engineer, is paid to the City of Denton.
2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for land uses
in Phase III (see attached map) or prior to January 11 19921
whichever occurs first, a revised traffic study for the
entire 72S acre development, specifically addressing all
' transportation questions relating to property in the City of
Denton, must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer.
Q1 ~ ~
ALTERNATIVES
i
y,
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with conditions
3. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. 'Concept Plan
" 3. Development Standards
4. Ordinance 86.109
;r S. Reply Form Totals
6. Property Owner List
7. Minutes of the November 120 1966 Planning and Zoning
rt~jy. Commission meeting.
S. Land Use Map - Phase III
r s
y 1
+ r
C' .
e '
I' YN++ ~ 1i
y~x 1671a
a
,n'..
'.~d'f+N' 'A 'VOW
F
Y
a
r
FF s,
1
I LI
L l
PD- 20
, r---
`
+ PD-76 r\
1
-12
I
Z- 1842
i ' x•54
1
I
~1~ a
r
y y
~ fit,
Concept Plan
OAKMONT q
' Denton, Texas
'~'a:~•., \ It'll 11.
114oj INI 04.IIq YII
1 11% 1111 U.N1 LIIH IYI IdN• bgli dllw
•~R N•11w1 \ buu. bu, 14a* Io.1u4. Solid tat
i of 01. a..
10 % 113 ~ ,y \
%
yS1 S 1 ~ `v .01000:.1
P14
11 y, ,
l~ , 1 I
L
1041.•n41 b::: dulno. ~ ~ \ 1 14
\n{ ~~~1~( \
Iillu•1 bnI11 T
bYi•1:0.4`0 h1 . UH ll.u1N \ 9401.11, Sao
a ub uNHl.~I.
I•INN ` ~f 7 \
Ih w..pl
•A.
see 6e
/ 111 of 1.110• `r. F01,
" yam... , / ~/I III.v f~`
N.11 NN n 1166..•
If NIIN o1N4i 4 NX1 1 H ffil w1 66111 •N111•luly. •n • 111 '`,ice i
1«G Mf11/ 11 Mf1 M. f
•i6o.4 1 1Mg6 111 NN011/ 66 IIN 1NOw 1i' LIINI If 66N.. }
. b•ii Y N It' 1111Gw I..ulXu 11 UI' IN •.b .•1•i. a fu.•1 fu•ul
sit .T 1. •I141S I.1 r Iln Ilf.
wIN•I IIffNI Mya U O4U1 wulq•' \
6NM.1 11 1 141 Y 1N11.• 11y all _ IN.UIL1
fWid N"NII11 . f1o1 w•.IH.111 1 11
.a at Y.•1.111 1 I I 0.4 l 11.4 • I. 4NI
1 Nr 6"0.1 Ilrl bl 40... UI HI 11. o, h1. . U IO.O11.1f 1•f111 Yu.
w . 11 .NI 11 1011 .4 11114 We 11.10.41..4 ...11 Ilhl ILf (111111111 '
qub141 p•su4 IbN Hllllu. U p. 0.1.11 hp. 1.11000 11 1,1 611.
i IN 111 4
11 Hl. f1w~ f.IN 11 .111. plod, Aid,
11W4 / 11111 661.11. 111• 0.610 11 1 .Ohio y
111.14..1 411X! IIN. .IIN 11 1/1111.1..•
.11 111111 IIU it, We 1.11
Or 0
D
{
a, ` f ti
{ 4,
d
~n
1
vVI
t
1
AlIBNDMENT TO Z-1745 TRACTS "E-1" and "E-2"
PD Ordinance No. 86-109
Commercial and office - As approved
permitted uses f
Maximum height - The maximum height of buildings shall I
not exceed fifteen (15) stories.
a' Area requirements - As approved
Floor area ratio - As approved
Building materials - As approved
k
r;
Parking requirements - One (1) off-street parking space shall
a' be provided for each three hundred
' (300) square feet of floor area.
Parking sill be permitted within yard
and setback areas.
+
y
r ~
R1
J
,F ~y` ,i
« ~ , r l.w.+wr.„,. .44.. t+W.w•..wu.. o,.._y[ JJ
.;r . . L+n'.iw.F+r'+~LA"twq~jr~{}yfj Yf'+.Lly.k~
I
Yp.
bn
1
STATEMENT OF INTENT
To ensure a development that provides a variety of goods and
services intended to be compatible with existing and proposed
land uses in the vicinity.
i
;i
RELATIONSHIP TO DENTON DEVELOPME" GUIDE
This development is located in a moderate intensity area and
provides diversity through a community unit concept with jobs
close to housing and a transportation balance eliminating
tripe across town for day-to-day needs.
DEVELOPMEW SUMMARY
Commercial and/or office Uses 43.4 Gross Acres Total
& Maximum lel F.A.R. Maximum floor area 1,890,504
square feet
j TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
There shall be a minimum separation of two hundred (200) feet
between points of access off of the Intcratate 35E frontage
r road.
* All streets, paving and parking lots shall conform to
r
standards employed by the City of Denton.
g PROJFCT$D TRAFFIC GENERATION
J Traffic projections outlined in the Site Traffic Analysis for
w Oakmont Estates prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
BUILDINGS
Building locations and minimum setbacks as shown on
ConcePt Plan. she
Y
~r A building envelope is defined as that area within which
buildings are anticipated to be located. Building envelopes,
as indicated on the Concept Plan, are subject to change.
Maximum building height fifteen (15) stories.
TREES
e
~i4f tee:
w 4 ; ' Tree masses are shown on the Co:icept Plan. Every effort will
be taken to ensure the survival of significant trees on site.
1
y
, "M.M t 4~:yQp~IM(e"~i1W'ai'J'.~p+4''4!'niA:. »a nrn
r
r
i
i
9
SCREENING
Screening elements shall be addressed on the Detail Plan.
Orr-SITE IUMPMATION
3
P As shown on the Concept Plan. J
b r UTILITIES
Existing utilities as chown on the Concept Plan. The pro
a posed
sanitary sewer location is subject to change. Precise
locations of utility lines shall be
Plan for this area. addressed on the Detail
III '
DEMOPMENT SCHEDULE
Detail Development flans for initial phasing will be
submitted within 8 years, or by November, 1994. At that
time, specific scheduling of Detail Plan submittals for the
remaining phases of this area will bo outlined. It is
1 anticipated that buildout of the development should occur
within a 25 year period or by the year 2011.
, u
n
r t I
* 8 `9
I,
F
A .3
tab f. i6'YM1^INi.'J.Ya. - A~F.~4'?i~1~~~~#4:F.~~~.T'~S'pp.`"~.
x f~'
yF
iL
y
l
.i1Jr
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF'
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE 40.11 AS E
AMENDED, AAD AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 74.1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
. ON THE NEST SIDE Of INTERSTATE 35-S, APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET
SOUTH OF STATE SCHOOL ROAD, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREATION OF A NEk PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT FOR THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN, SAID LANn BEING PART Of
PLANNED ANPENALTY RINTA MCREATED BY AXIMUM AMOUNT 0. Of f1000ND0
F00. VIOLATION THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI
SECTION I.
That the Zoning lAap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted
the 11th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
` Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No.
69.1, as a ended, and as said map a plies to the real property E
i described in Exhibit A, attached Reteto and Incorporated by
reference, is hereby amended to provide for the creation of a
r new planned development district for the land herein described, 4
j said land previously being part of that planned development
t district created by Ordinance No. 10.36, so that hereafter the
y land described herein shall be governed and controlled by the
pprevisions of this ordinance; the provisions of Ordinance No.
y' f0.36 as they apply to the lend herein described being expressly
+ repeated,
SECTION It.
That the site a
pi , attached her%to as Exhibit B and
• Incorporated herein by reference, is approved as a preliminary
site plan for the dlstrict, Any comprehensive site plan
the dewloopmiat sconceptd site plani11Anyt amended concepppt pwpIan
submitted for approval shall show and include the whole dlstrlet.
SECTION III.
r.
Y That the district herein approved shall be subject to the
following conditions, restrictions, and tieltetionst
1. Prior to the beginning of any development of construction
within the district, or of any parcel of IW or phase thereof
or the issuance of any building permits therefore a detaliea
comprehaslve site plan for the parcel of lan~ for which
development to proposed, whether one or more, shall be submitted
` e for approval in accordance with the provisions of Appendix
/-Zoning of the Cade of Ordinances and the requirements of this
ordinance, The tempeeblnltYe site plane required herela ,hill
Is submitted in the manner r".S form acceptable to the Department i
~x of Planning and Coarunlty Davila, sat and shall ;how or contain Ei
informatlaa is to all proposed land uses, development standards
and rolulat ions to be applicable therein Including, but not
' limited to, the location of a11 buildings and structures
sstrists, parking and loading areas, reeraatloa open a sees, and
1
Nithtreef, elit buildings and struatureijclthe diaentioniiaef
r+}• " bug ding lees; the maximum lot coverages and building setbacks;
r.
+ I
. `1
I
I
i
I
i
i
applied to all signsi and such other information as may be
required by the department,
1 Any comprehensive site plan required to be submitted
Smallnbeoin substantial ceepll qce with nth, as
ecret;e denxhiybita
ditiaednland ruses andlrtquir nentssshown on Exhibits L=lathrouhh
D•s, said Exhibits being attached hereto and incorporated herein
by »forence,
a SECTiON,Iy
That the proposed land uses for the district as provided for
herein shall be considered persittsd uses,
of the required comprehensive site subject to approval
plans shoving the design,
location, and arrangement of the buldings, structures, lots,
a backstso bufferingandandad icteeningo oiDidevices ,comand sill so other
" development features required to be contained therein, as
required by this ordinance,
SECTION Y.
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the final comprehensive site plan herrattet
approved and made a part hereof for all purposes and the retula•
t Ono, conditions, and provisions herein contained.
The Zoning Hap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
11th day of January, 19650 as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of, Denton Texas under Ordinance No.
69.1, as amended, Is herey amended to show such thane in
District Classititation and Use subject to the above conditions
and specifications.
SECTION YI.
That the City Co4ncil of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
lan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
~ity of Denton Texas, an with reasonable consideration anion
other things for the character of the district And for its
peculiar suitability or particular us(s, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
4 and eneouraling the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City o Denton, Texas, and its citi:ans,
YII
q., IMULL
r` Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinsnce,
or tilts to comply therewith or with any of the requirements
thereof, or of a permit or clrtitleste issued thersundero shall
be guilty of a alsdsmeaaor punishable by a tine mot exceeding
One Thousand Dollars ($1,060.00). Etch such
doomed guilty of A separate oftanse for each nd averYSAday be
Portia cop
ti 1 n thereof during which any violation of this ordi
. committed, or continued, and upon conviction of Any
violation, such person shall be punished within the limits Above,
' r SECTION 'v',ff.
k
s
hereby directed to cause the c♦ptioa of this ordinance to be koc k
Published tithe cityhOf Denton, Taxes$ Cwithinltan (10) (f ays of
the date of its passage.
1
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1916.
! e
RAT urmzwFRXTW
A~ CIITY P DENT N, TEXAS
;.I
4 io
ATTESTt }
1
k '
CITY OF DENTON,'TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LECAL FORMi
CITYAOFDDENTON~Y1'tlV1IGTS CHi CITY ATTORNEY
,
s
L
w
z
I
1 e t 4 Sf~
ai / I
a
r -'K
" r 4..
r .L4 f
i f: / air e✓ I
r r. P:'S
'r I ~X.F,::N .r.ny : r; w.;..,.n.. , e., {y., .-x,t~ i'M't 4 afi+l A4Y~N''aSAH.F'".*~Y+~?"►'°
nr4 ,k .r v :
r
1
}fir 'f
EXHIBIT "A,"
I
FIELD NOTES f
Te T {
Abstract Noa, t Ursct of land situated 6 p,IRn,tR, he C
30 and the N,E P , W, lislker Surrey,
.
No, 950 City of Denton, Denton Count Co, Survey' Abstract
particularly described ss follows; y' Texas, and being more
BEG IN;VING at a Faint in the eastert,
h'lmbleton Ylllage, pase an ldditlon io the OfyBlock I of
Denton County, Teas, said point being 77,66' nortAOr, Denton,
nattherlY ]:ne of h'inston Drive, aeasured along the eaiterlyhe
of said Block 1, Said point also n
line between the city of Oentan aDendltLIM the
heofaCorlntAtYalPimiline
ints
for Corner; Y 6c o
t
B1ockTIENJEsVtea edit on,CSaipla4lneoaignlthjnnlnterly line of
the left having s radius of 195.00' a 1 g o a curve to
6;" and a chord beaN ng of 577 36 10 ¢ "A Central angle of 11 $6'39,
e
W 0101
ihENCE in a southeasterly dir a
ectionpninAnd &long tfor career; curve
radi}seeondteueved iiida~erondvcurve beinlnt being the beginning
coradirneurs; of and a central angle ome to the right having a
00 1 ' 43, to a point for
THENCE
to the end oto an easterly direction and aeon
g said curve, 93.93'
THENCE vS}ot'ld E, cu11rve0.00 s , tc
f r ntheobe`tanjn` of s cure to the
a left chohrd av bieangriang radius,
of us of 2672.21'0 a central angle of 2 0113S" and
t4 yt' "So30'23"W, s point far corner;
E THENCE in a westerly direction and aloes~ said curve, 99.93'
6a " to the end of said curve said point being tfie beginning of s
y7; second curve, said ratan curve bein¢ to th
Of 95,00 and s central angle e right having a radius ihENCE in a ►e of 310S7,40'0a point for corneal
sterl y and northwesterly direction and along
said curer, 437 S9' to the end of said curve, a point for corner;
THEN 534b3f'w, 302.90' to the beginning of a curve to the
left having a radiua .'f 960,00' and a ntrslangle of ,021'23"
t a point for corneal
rl THENCE igo a northwesterly dIasptlion and
20.04 to the o2d1of sold curve, a point for Corner{
THfi1CE N41 along said curve, '
E, (39.29'
Eye to THENCE N42osve, 691,40' to a
of I DDpoint inrthireouihwesterly line
J nterstate H hooray SSE (a 300 R/ir) p
THENCE S47I's with the southwester lyiline of sa drHlghws)•,
I
171,42' to the Deglnnln of a eurveatothe left hsvln~ a radius
of S1f9,62 and A centra an le of 3 161 , a ppoint for corner; NCE highwayESSE andaAlonghsaide cutveo~ 331,22' w to ntheeendWofiw dfCur e,
s point for corer;
THENCE MOWS and continuing slang the southwesterly line
of Interstate H4hway 35E, 500,12 to a point for Corners
THENCE $so 73'E and Continuing Along the southwesterly line
x" of said Highway, 97,30 to a point in the common city limits line
y between the Citv of Denton and the City of Corinth, same bein in
the southerly line of the G. W. Walker Survey, Abstract Na. 130,
f a paint for corner=
' Z-1703
a'
~ I
I
r
t ~4
yi
r f
i
f
i
EXHIBIT "A" (Continued)
FrFO WTFc
~ tract 3'2a'nefnued I
THENCE N woo'W with the common city limits Line between the
City of Denton and the Cl li
ty of ~orlneh, same being ne
southerly line of the G. w, Walker Survey, Abstract lo,
J06B.1S' to the Place of beginning and contalning 70.261 acr
land,
1770,
es of
f Tract 4
h BEING a tract of land
Survey, Abstract No. 4S0 situated In the 4,E,P h P,R,R, Co.
and beingp more pa O, Ctty of Denton, Denton Count
BEGMING at + Y described as toltoxs; y' Texas, 11
School Road (a 60' R%uj,ta;;dth• northeasterly line of State
E line of Block 16 of H'lmbletan ppolar bolo`` In the southwesterly
the city of Denton, Denton County, No PRase VI, in Addition to
120.06' from the southwester) lint No
ssld ppoint also being
along the R/W tine at State SchosoidWInstoa D
' rive, ed
r,
THENCE
Vill N480
Altus , 126.90 30 E with the boundary n Point for corner,
' to the beylrnlnt of curveo of sth~ ejmhtehiving
+ radof 180.00'
orner; and a a
t, c
ntral angle of 65014'11", i polar for
Tt;E.1'CE in a northeasterlyeasterly and southeasterly direction
with the boundary line of Said-Addition and along said curve,
ti :0S12THE.Io the at said curve a Point for corner;
" h'lmblaton Vlllagi, phase Vint99u9n &iothethe Inninarotline u`fe
FIJ
r
loathe right having a radius of il0.00' and sgcenerSl ang
20
02 20 a Point
Is of
' of $AidEAddition andt for
lon cojrnesar; lddtutve,p62.v91, to etheuIndra soil
curve a Pelnt for corner; HgV I'M AXI , ?has* vts1211i0tto tAonbeginnim of $ ad WImbleton
having s radius of 480,00 and
Point for corner a central angle of 320 J1tolthea left
,
THENCE to a esoutheaster,
nd Along y direction with the boundary tEne
of "aid Ad a lion and Hong Iscid
curve said curve, 274,17' to the end o! Bald
the City of
80 At being in the common city limits line between
THENCE SSoai'tWaoltAhthiitiidfcommontt~e> ltmntsfororner,
S~ to a ppoint for corner;
y THENCB 583P12'k
line of the with the common city limits tine between
it of Denton and the city of Corinth, same being atom ,tt a nrtherly
l te►1 Young Surrey, Abstract so, 1451, 611,13 to a
Rude In the northeasterly tone of the if ore mentioned
'lE , a polnt for ~orne State School
tHESCB YSS032'k xlth the A/W tlni'of 'slid State School Road,
' . 111, 82' to a pob corner;
r, THENCE~N g S S33;W W w witrh the northeasterly tin& of said State
school kaad 11.63' ti the place of beginning and containing
a.Sl1 acres of land.
•r,
al
p r v
71
r
}
4
i
r
+
•
' . E-1105
l~
Iti
~oarlnNnlo ,
KS A..
Commarcia! Shopplnp ~
1).10 Ac,
cLUSTS
HOMES i~f4
1?.50 Ac.
1.55 Ac,
SINGLE PAMtLY w•w ~..•.wwr.r
Clus<f r Roma
Single family Nonl•a
coal "a
•
arlmanirl
Condom ums
• 14.6 Ac
t
• it .
c
i
I,
j
+ EXHIBIT "C"
a ~I
r
USE ACRES
Clwter DEYSIiY UNITS
12rS0 5 u/i
,M Slnple family 73
4+SS 4 u/a 11
Commercial 43.40
NA NA
Multi Family 14,30
21 u/a 313
M f
Ell I-
1 y P
q r .M
1
lT~ tt~ i
rre
+
j~
S Q r
~ 2.1103 r
Y+;a y rt
A ~
~~#.4 ~w.~ YImL LM ''A'+>+./'„~y{Y VM7a4'f+1 .Ylgcep...b$4dWhtaWWy
a
r.
boom
I
h7(I,IBIT "D•1"
CLUST R "01918
of►rmuralre
•a
>a
fingia 1as11
e r deeacned unies.
Rf00imfmfm7fe
r '
Heleht Maulnm,n se Two {2! storlu in height.
r .
Aroma R__ .e11 r..~a~
1 n r - minimum twenty-!!ve 111) feet,
Side - minlmus !!ve If) foil. A side
Yard adlaeen! tea r
Weak she ;l not be lots than ten y 110) feat,
r' eat YlIQ - minimum ten 1101 fat. 1
a. ` i' r.e - Ieue tAeuund five hundred la,sogl squats feel, I
Sit ytdeh - minimum fifty I!0) fat,
r !
i LCt Caar~' minimum ninety (90) tat.
r t 5r ~+~~,C{a er.lli lno_ 1~ - The minimum !loot uu of any dwelling unit
sha11 be one lheuand two hundred fifty 110250) square fat.
tot tevuaaa - Naslsu■ silty (10) pageant by buildings.
~ f
lagllne R- a- 1111"U:t_e minimum two III epaea pet will!,
lulldlnm materu t,e All dwelling units shell be eenatruetsd of
Fr muonry- , stud- dedo ar of m glue building material of the find urualty
used for outside wall candituction, to the extent of at lout
eevaty-five till paseent of the area of the outside Willi.
. o` RNidanllal 0,,,ea .e
malsus 1.0 dwelling unite pet sees.
A.
e~
t
,
r
2-110!
3 ;
,r
Uy :1
I
j yM `,rrY TM
e ,
i
+ ce
f
EXE131 i "D-2"
~ ;IIROLt r~ ~t~ (,Y tl0~te
- ~ DtfiMlTlOMr 'i Detached housing.
' R/Q01A/MLNT/t j
I
Meleht M nnente, MAXIMUM two end one-half I1•1/11 starlee in
height,
` a Ant Rraulnesnlel
o A Mlnlmum twenty-five (15) loot.
iAiu fly: ($I
j~ stsa~ii;;4+11Mnotmbe lrsa ehonfflftsan I1/1 het,Adjeosnt to a
UAL-ud • Mlnieum twenty (101 feet,
tat Area - Minimum iwen thousand seven hundred 17,700)
• y~•1 agwa tone.
j &at width - Minimum seventy 170) foot.
Osolh • M1niMuM ono hundred ten 1110) fool.
~ ~ Ti'~ Mlnlmwm DVdlles ■/•r.
z' The mlnlMUm floor Area of Any dwelling unit
4
shalt De ont lneueaAd llvs hundred 1111001 $guire test.
Y it 331, Caves - MAXIMUM fatty-firs (41) 0090thk by buildings.
Aerklna /eaulrAeent.~ { MlnlmuM of two (t) aff•streat Parking s0eesre
e N,, ena11 Ee provided for sash dwlllrg uell.
t 1, ,~ylldsno~ All 'Nailing units $MIl be Constructed of
` msaonry, stucco, ar of A glass building material of the kind usually
used fat outside vall Bonet watlon, to the extent of at lelst
it seventy-fivf t7g1 Percent of the area el the outside walls.
. idani~lA- lpeemikyl
rA, F Qsrtslev - Marloua of 1.5 dwslttng units Pet sere.
F:
.4 ' LAP.
s
h
;7 :P q A
Mx I ' ,
k .f i ryye •;j r'
'y ~ - _ ~ .,a+n.t•NY'4M\L~•1[vaw l.r • •.~y...3 r'Y.,1JY'.AiYN.I ..Iiltn~al~/I•I'~' "'~'M~^
,
5 ~ a
.t
f
I~
I
EXHIBIT "D•b°'
COMMERCIAL SHOPPING
PERMITTED USES:
All uses as permitted in the commercial and office toning
districts, except that the following uses shall not be permitted:
'Amusement, commercial (outdoor) drag strip or commercial
racing
'Asphalt or concrete bitching plant (permanent)
'brick kllm or Cite plant
'Cemetery or mausoleum
'Dormitory, boarding or rooming house
'Dump or sanitary till area
f #1 'Extraction and sale of sand, caliche, stone, clay or gravel
'Fairgrounds or exhibit area
r~, ~ r"6 'GO•Cart slim
a A',r 'Half•t+ay house
'Hatchery (poultry)
•Heullog or storage company
" T 'Heavy machinery sales and storage
'Home for care of alcoholics, narcotic, or psychiatric
patients
'Livestock auction
' 'Livestock feeding plant, pans or yards
s
'Mnning or storage of mining wastes
t' 'Open salvage yard for rags, machinery, etc,
'Petroleum collecting or storage yard
'Private utility shop or storage yard
'Rodeo grounds
i
i ° 'Sand, gravel or earth sales of storage
3
p
Y.
n
v~
r
r rya
r7 1> r;
r
r
..a
EXHIBIT "D•!" (Continued)
+
'Stables, boarding
'j
'Stables, commercial rental
j 'Stables, private club
11 bufld~ngjnd sales of furniture or appliances (outside of a
1 q 'Theater (drive•ia)
I
'Tire retreading or recapping F
'cool or trailer rental
'Trailer camp or mobile hose park
' 171ailer rental or sales
'Used auto parts sales (inside of a building) j
AIVIAEMENTS!
ie__.io~ 'sAeaulreabatl1 Maximum of two and oaf-half (2.1/2)
S
r y,,1+ ~1rea Reoulrements~
roar and • Minimum twenty-five (21) feet
Side Yard • Minimum fifteen (1S) feet
Aear Yard • No rear yard Is required
i~j~x LaasaedOenSare Tfve(Si
percent of the fetal
c'°'` tot ,te i7i3i m~Tntatned a indscaped open space.
Lot Coverage • Maximum fifty (SOU percent by buildings,
Door Area astiet Maximum lsl r
z,
gul'dlnm Material,, The rafr building exteriors sAltti be
cons uc to o S ass, store, brick, tiles cement, concrete,
or aimllar materials, or any Combination I.#root.
tarklae Aeauframentat One (1) off-street parking space
s we g prov ear each txa hundred (100) square test of
~F floor space,
1.1945
v
pfbk r' ' RF~ l1 -
1 ~
1
. ,yp..•..w. -+:w rr.p, .v. -+a+q.J.vNY{{A~~,d+.Miv'M!iNNFIMOFM
V
Y
+",n007, t
e;;lttat. Ila-a" ~
AIAmTNlN'f!/CGYpDNSMI4Mm
~ D!►tmiTSONi
'
Mwlti-tsmily. The structures will 14096 from two 111 unite per
k to sixteen Ilsl units per building. building
RlQD1mRMiNT1l1
' N4teAt Aw- u~ It..t~t Two And ono-half 11-1/11 stories in height.
lltlA_Rea-~ira~neri E
1 fren~ • Minimum twenty all tea.
a 1E171LYJiQ • Minlmu■ ton 110) tee!. A building s•paratlan of
titean 11111 teat shall be eSarvxd b.tween structures. A Aldo
yard 4dlsahk to a at took shall nol be tea than title" 1111 toot.
rw 1~ifLSLL4 - Minimum twenty 121) feet.
Ge! Area - Minimum siatan thousand 114.0041 square toot.
1 Let trteeh • Minimum ntnati ,10) toot.
i
Lek Deeeh 'Minimum ninety 1701 cat,
' t shah 1 ttvs hundre fSJO) mquaremta~ierA lot rilsea I Nnglellevilunlt
units) and seven hundred fifty 1750) squats tomb for studies (two
fi level unite).
w;d, Let C~ e~.11 . Matlwm fifty (34) percent by buildings and paving.
w r
Hrklna NAau!•------ 1 a,
ilj' e, unit. ------t A minimum two 111 parking spews par dwelling f '
41 lylldtea- N- a~ tei~t All dw111nq units shall to rensetueted of e
! maaay, Atuare, ar of a glass building sitseul of the kind usually J
ueW for eet•tde Will aonotruatloh, to the stmt of at last
cL gvenWit% 11111 percent of the Area ',It the outside walla.
] pill III balldlivt
E ;`3 plJtlltY - Marimum 14.0 dwelling units pat Ara.
.7,
li
j
:o,,
'r r
i Z
' f
r AAemp4ara,.-...,.n.rr... w.- ..rnllh:.a'osM+'.,~,.
_ u,{.ny..,.»:t:d~f1't~i1.ri>fMWK `•&NVM 1'1if:'NW I."'.
n
r
t
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1842
I IN FAVOR IN OPPQSITION UNDECIDED
i
None Received None Received
t,
~ r.
dt e k It v • •
ti . 5 1, y 1
y;
~P Ads .Nr Al
to `a. l 'S„
x ;
n 1.
yt t
mou
i
v
n ~f
.1 4
•
1
xA , t
16 _ -
3 J ~
i
P
J'h el Lln V)
en v42,. j'/
i
N
rf
04
64
a,
4 1
w,
r
{
j
,fir,
P 6 2 Minutes
November 12, 1986
Page 6
1
Rusty Callaway, 3001 Weston Drive, asked at•out a light
1 system at the intersection of Mockingbird u,d University.
Mr. Clark stated that the project is in the bond issue.
Mr. Claiborne stated that this would be done if the Capital
Improvement Plan Program Is approved by the voters.
i. ;
'i Mr. Calloway asked about the bridge in this area that is j
belnp proposed and will it be improved. Mr. Burke stated j
' that it would be widened by 6.8 feet. 4
Mr. Claiborne asked if the bridge would be a box culvert
situation. Mr. Burke said yes, probably.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that this property is
Mate Tn low Intensity area that is currently over the
standard based on existin toning; therefore, the least
intense, most to ical loni use for the site must be eon-
sidered. She sold that planned developments with 6,000 j
square foot or smaller lots are Iocoted to the east, west
and south of this property and the developer originally
proposed 6,000 square foot lots on this tract. Due to the
intensity violation and tie over-concentration of small
lot sites in this area, staff requested that the developer y
revise the request to meet SF-1 standards. After further
study and negotiation the developer submitted a new plan j
featuring a mixture o~ lot sires ran in from 6,000 square
ur feet to 11,510 square feet. She sol~ tat In summation,
this proposal is compatible with existing toning and land
uses In the area.
swerAquesti.Burke stated that he was available to
+n
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
777FIT- Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried
Mr. Molt returned to the meeting.
A.
C.2 x•1842. Petition of The Nelson Corporation, representing
t Fyeis Development Corporation, requesting an amendment to
z a planned development and approval of I concept plan. 'f he
property is located south of I•SSE and southeast of State
School Road and is approxieately 43.4 acres In the G.W.
f' Walker Survey, Abstract 1330. If approved, the amendment
would permit the maximum helleht of the structures to in-
crease from 2 1/1 to 15 stories and provide for a one
parking space to 300 square ieet of floor space ratio
rather than a one space to 200 square feet ratio,
Three notices were mailed to property owners within 200
Usti no reply forms were received in favor or opposition,
Ms. Carson stated that the petitioner has requested that
yr, the height be limited to eight stories rather than fifteen
! ? stories but all other informatlon would be the lame is far
as floor area ratios and parkin!! are concerned. She said
that the Oakmont Development whlth is a 125 acre project j
1 in southeast Denton wtl before the City Council for public j
hearings In ISIS and due to some complications In technical
requirements the ordinance was not adopted until 1916. She
said that during the time between the public hearin` and
C' the actual ordinance being drafted there was 1 conflict
between the stiff and the developer's interpr4tation of
the requirements that were submitted to the Planning and
' toning Commission and City Council, Shd Slid basicilly
this concerned the height requirement. She said that the
'w staff recommendation and then the recommendation from the
Commission to the City Council was based on the height
being limited to two and one halt stories in A commercial
district. she said that the petitioners were under the
assumption that the area wit a "Cumulative planned devel-
opment" and that the regulation concerning height in the
r
j
P 8 Z Minutes
I November 12, 1986
Page 7
} office areas would be allowed. She said after discussion
J with the legal department, staff concluded that the height
was limited to two and one half stories based an Informa-
tion and recommendation from the Planning and SonlnyY Coa-
mission and what was actually approved by the City Council.
The Council voted to approve the ordinance with the two and j
r one half story Limit but they stated that they would be ln-
i terested in hearing the reasoning for the increase in
height if an amendment was submitted.
Mr. Holt asked if additicrnal stories would add to the
intensity. Ms. Carson said no because they have the same
floor area ratios even with more stories.
Mr. Holt asked if the petitioner was required to stick by
this plan, Ms. Carson said yes unless another amendment
is approved by the City.
Mr. Holt asked If the traffic would be greater.
Ms. Carson said no. She said that this is on aesthetic
a question in whether more stories are appropriate in this
at i area,
°
Ms, Carson asked If there was any problem in reduclnee from
1S to g stories. Mr. Morris stated that the Commission can
consider anything that is less than the original change.
PETITIONER: Craig Curry, Nelson Corporation, stated that
r ter Re Council approved the ordinance they asked If
they would entertain an amendment to the ordinance for a
{ height Increase, He said that the direction liven to them
vas to come back through the process and ask for a height
f acreetract said that
commercialhusa, Heesaidnthyy atnitudoesaallow
for office use and felt that two and one half !revile were
j lust not practical. He said that they first considered
i. fifteen stories but felt with further consideration that
eight stories were more appropriate. He said that they
were askini for an amendment of the height to eight
stories in the parking ratio change,
Mr. Clsitorne asked If the floor area ratios would be the
some, Mr. Curry sold yes,
IN FAVORt None present.
OPPOSEDt Mitchell Turner, gilt Stone tate, stated that
ee1191 tortes would create more traffic, a not consistent
;i with the existing neighborhoods to the west end south and
is not compatible or aesthetically acceptable. He said if
apppproved the city maybe inheriting s fire safety respond-
n bllity that they may not be qualified to handle, He stated
a that this request already exceeds the moderate intensity
ores standards. He sold that this request does not Imp re re
thou Miniotrend and the two and one half story requirement
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that this property is to-
:4 n A moderate intensity area currently over the stun- i
died, The intensity was based on a rem a because only a I
proposed floor area ratio was provided during the original
? requestj however, this proposal Includes a maximum of
1 890,501 square feet. the said that the petitioner
claimed the original standards submitted for other sections
outside Denton applied to the commercial area, Therefore
If in office use is proposed then the height requirement
r f could be considerably more thin two and one half stories.
1 The concept presented numerous problems from an
administra- tive standpoint In trying to determine whether a building
was cnmmerelei with two and one half stories, office with
I more starts or some six,* f the tw Land ut4 wit A a u s•
tion About tow many stir al were oIlowed. Ae a fd t a
the amendment would Ala di r, t
orte witK t re 1 o
the specific land use Yn A~dit a tie ar~iYn r~l~o s
being altered to provide one s un9a~d to Borer ~ny [and
yv{p .,p taasr,{,A1, w.n.nt,„y , ,.a,r „
Y
1
1
P 6 Z Minutes
November IZ, 1916
Page 8
1
j use proposed rather than attempting to determine the park-
ing allocation as space was leased or sold. She said that
staff rtcommends approval of Z-1101 and felt the increased
number of storles would provide a sound buffer to the ad-
Jacent residential uses.
Mr. Claiborne asked if the parking ratio is close to the i
office use. Ms. Carson said yes and that this might change
the intensity of the tract in that it would be more likely
used as office.
Mr. Holt asked how many buildings could they have an the
property. Ms. Carson stated that they would have to be
approved on the detailed plan. Mr. Holt stated that he
could not see how the intensity would not increase.
Ms. Carson stated that no matter how many stories there
are they ar+ not changing the floor area ratios. Mr. Holt
asked For cl.iriflcation of the yarkingg standards.
! Ms. Carson skid that the 1 to 300 is in line with office I
' use and the 1 to 200 with commercial use. She added that I
there is a risk involved in that the property could da-
p velop as commercial and use the 1 to 200 parking ratio.
She said that many commercial developers have a minimu■
amount of spaces and usually are more than the city
standard. She said that small retailers could have ■
i problem if the entire area develops as commercial.
Mr. Claiborne asked if the fire department had a problem
with this request. Ms. Carson stated that the fire de- j
fi^ partment had no objections during the DRC process and that
y,
ob Hagemann, Fire Marshal, has suggested Internal sprink-
let systems to some cases.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Curry stated that there will be no increase
3n tntenslty. He stated that the 1 to 1 floor area ratio
will be the same. He said that he felt the amendment would
be compatible with the area and property to the south in
Corinth which has a height limitation of ZO stories. He
said that they have worked the parking out with the staff
' which could be lived with in either case, He sold that
k the users dictate the parking. He said that they would
" appreciate favorable consideration,
R. Mr. Claiborne asked if he was at the intersection of Shady
Shores Road and 1-M. how would he get to this piece of
property Mr. Curry stated that under the proposal that
w +i the service road be one-way, a person would go north. on
the service road and toga back underneath the lnterchanYe
;r and go south on the service road. Mr, Claiborne asked it
Oakmont was fully developed how would a person get to the
property. Nr. Curry said beslu liy the $ame way. He
added that he felt the project was a satisfactory land
use, according to the traffic study. Mr. Claiborne stated
t a' that the internal network of roads within Oakmont do not
have any access to this tract, Mr. Curry stated that at
this time no but that there Is no master plan as yet.
Ms. Cation stated at this point there is no access to this k
tract. She said that as the Commission receives detailed
plans it would have control over any access between the
nulti-faally and commercial and between the cluster and
r the commercial, She said that the Commission could place
et a condition that there be or not be access from the parcels i
Into the commercial aces. Mr. Claiborne stated that the
detailed plan stage would be the appropriate time for the
access discussion,
r. " { Chair declared the public hearing closed.
D"IS",i Mr.
Claiborne stated that with tAa floor area
rsifo stsyinr the same he could see no problem, ile amid
that compatibility is a problem. Me sale that in regards
to safety that adequate sprinkler systems could be accom-
t+odated and not a major concern.
~Y w
+
,.i eW!dPlWr 7M:~. A✓45,f iM 4 PY.M,'«,'K,C n'~Lt 'A41~.1=1 r.
r~'
t
{ P 4 2 Minutes
November 12, 1986
Page 9
Mr. Holt stated that he felt the Commission would be run-
ning a risk if the request was approved if the property
was sold or developed by another person in regards to
parking. He said that a was concerned about the seethe-
` tics in that there could be an isolated tall building. He
said that he would not like to he living next to an eight
' story building. He added that he would vote against the
amendment because of aesthetics.
Mr. Escue moved to recommend denial of 2-1842. Seconded
by Mr. Holt and motion failed (3.3). Mr. Claiborne,
Mr. Glasscock and Mr. Kamran voted no.
I
Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of 2.1842.
Seconded by Mr. Kamman and motion failed (3.3). Ms. Cole,
: Mr. Escue and Mr. Holt voted no.
Chairman Bill Claiborne advised that 2.1842 would be for-
warded to the City Council with no recommendation from the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Y j D. 2.1843. Petition of Richard Cushman requesting a change
Tn ioning from the single family (SF-7) district to the
general retail (GR) district on a 0.913 acre tract located
on the south side of U.S. dlghway 380E (University Drive)
approximately 350 feet eost of Ruddell Street. The prop-
erty is further described as a tract in the J.D. Lilly
j Survey, Abstract 762 If the request is approved, the
property nay be utilized for any purpose ppemitted in
the General Retail district by the City of Denton Zoning
Ordinance.
l Six notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet= one reply form was received in favor, no reply forms
were received in opposition' a petition with 29 names not
within 200 feet was receive in opposition.
r 1
PETITIONER: Richard Cushman, 1SS1 Mingo Road, stated that
} he as een trying to sell the proyyetty. He added that he
lives on the property right now. He said that no one wants
to develop as SF-7 as currently toned and live next to
y apartments or a bowling alley.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: Janice Collvins, 2011 Boyd, stated that she
lives the neighborhood east of the request. She said
that this zoning request so come up on spproximately one
acre of land that Is joined by several businesses to the
r west, Sequoia Park to the east and idiot's Hill to the
lr'; northeast. She said that this zoning request is in vio-
lotion of the intensity standard for this arts and the
concentration and separation policies for general retail
She said that general retail exists within a half mile
west and is approximately four sires. She said that the
rezoning would impair the residential development of this
area and encourage strip coeertial into an established
residential area. She said that the access to Highway 380
Is very llmited and the property should remain single
" family. She said that retell in a residential area
downgrades the quality of the homes and can bring about
slue areas. She sold that requests of this type make the
people feel as If there is nowhere In the city that one
can be free of developers and speculators. She said that
d ; staff recommends denial of the petition because it I in If
violation of the Development Guide that was adopted by the %
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council and urged
the Commission's support to deny.
Rally 8riones, 1506 Seminole, stated that one of the main
„11 reasons she selected a hone a this area is because the
j' area was quiet and would be conducive to family livinl,
She said that the rezoning would be detrimental to all
~ ♦n
j
{
t
i
N P
Not to Scale r-.
b sF
0 4 1
J / CS •
: OAKMONT 0 OF
tl S /A/Cf F/~ 9 roe
{ ! ° s 1 cs
b 14
i t0 PH ON ~.13 /
11 1,2,/ ~f
J A/0 9
' TH 1 17
tA,
" w x 00) A/C i
Mkt f 42 V Io( NS 21 •
26 26 TH. i
i EH~
24' OF MEND
it
I
28 O x • ura IF-01.11, 114 4 1 /.M1N.r.111.X1 1N1u 11 l114X1•-.rX1
..11
a ~ O 1X•fi•. NN.u
' t !.•lg14r 9N.1
'a /X.11 nX X1~n
11 C H AI! • b 44.r/l1 W.l~...
A!-AI 11 1...X11
33 y r-rmu
' MI•bly1..MN UIN1q
r 1 tl•CIU 1r/1111NNNy
0.01141
Q y•. /0.On1X. Ouw
kl` rte..-~ h•Jy..M iNHai
v. EH Col11414 I.
1 34 e.ne.rll.
FIGURE 7
LAND USES-M
14
r
i
'•1
C
i
f
w ~
r m
am nx urn um
r 1 RYACt lwd Us" „I
; 3 Manbaz'
$ 1
2 OMMKVW
i 7 OoarraGYCi l
~29 s rm4ly
~
30 Estate Haar
32 Clustw Harr
32
Patio Hams
35
36
Gt
37 auden Has"
3S, 3
9 TOAt mMS
40 Mi*bm%ood Shopping
r
r OW%mm t n
II
A-1 clufftw n A-2yHarMa~/9ati0 Hares Patio Hmalm
r
9-_
ApwbmntmVCmdmiydnw
Coad
,
' I' 1♦hYy
♦y I ♦
M
♦
m3 : I , , I • R
I .
t ♦ t
14, t1
i 1
} "fie 1
i
' .f••• ..'x:~i'dWYS,r'ikR:diN't'iet$WA{~JTr:V,iid~6'fsa~c"•'+':~•v.a..
.t
♦l
♦ x
i
*+F c :,Y 9 1
I
I
i
s ~
Ep,~
I
tr 'f I ~
1
Pu.I• r 1
iEE'~a I 1
[Y
t 6 >L
R yt .y1
r 5~ +
y^ `ry4
r` T a' YY& X` ' 1
K`
i
u 1
d•l
rtt. i
I -F
-A I
w
. ~ .1 1 M 71:
y xl
I
n
K .Y
k
y
F
ti
L L L L I I I MII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
~ f
I
~x 1
4: r
A~
s ~ , f
r f
n
. i v . h1
i,
~ f
~ ~~"y 1' ~rl 1 r
Syr vr, ~ . y
Ire r s r
44 :
Sv "`r~Y ~'p+ r
r
f-
ka-
i
M I
I
.
r
' cfTyOIDENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566.8200
January 26, 1987 .I
z TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician
THRU: William J. Anderson, Assistant Director of Finance
G SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund
a
RECOMMENDATION:
Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued,
E SUMMARY:
Chapter 31,11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the
approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for re- '
funds in excess of $500.00, Taxpayer, Robert W. Owen, a~
r c has requested a refund in the amount of $1,111,61 for
double payment of property tax account 3940-01200.
yw
BACKGROUND:
~i Taxes were paid for Mr. Owen by his mortgage company on
' December 9, 1986, Mr. Owen also paid these same taxes
on December 31, 1983. Our records indicate a total of
$2,223.22 was paid against a base of $1,111,81, Mr.
Owen is requesting refund of the overpaid amount,
FISCAL IMPACT:
$1,111.61 to be refunded.
Respectfully submitted;
,r
7+` Victor Sc ne er
Tax echfiician
am n erson
tf kkV4M am
Assists t Director of Finance {
' i
a ~
,
~y N {
M ~7rlAr[F+fi"'M4`, 1l Mia i'r^'..t, `.'.9i [•'•RHy:Y 'S..aa x4
~5 _ rlrJtiM.' 4+[~.+. [ .,t.mwrW,aLY+dtFaY ,.M1+.«r:+vaa i..
• y
I 1
Y~ [~1
I~
I
i
F
We Proper* tax Board APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
6 MAndApplkallm 31.11(1182)
' Collecting Office Name. City of Denton Tax Office
i , Collecting Tax For. City of Denton
(Taxing Units)
1 315 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201
Address
City, State, Zip Code
.
In order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer.
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER:
Name.
3
s Address: i0 r*.an~ {
te Monica Denton Texas 76205
Telephone Number (if odditonrl Information is needed): 566- 6
" IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: j
Description of Property: Ifontecito Addn, Block A, Lot 12, 12/287-A
a pp~r~y; 3106 ante Monica
r
i Address or location of Propert3940-01200 Account Number of Property or Tax Receipt Numbs: _
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXER: i
Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of
From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amol,nt of Tax Refund
p Is Requested to Requested Tax Payment Terra P.14 Requested 4
1 City of Dentoig 86 12-9 /19.16_ _ _ 1,111.61 $ -0-
2:Q3tY of-Dentoniq 86 12-31/ 19 86 E , 1,111.61 f 1,111.81
r a ~`.r 3. t0 319_ 11 E
a Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documented* Our mortaaae company raid our
City taxes December 9, 1886, we also paid these same ta;.es on December 31.
1986, We would like a refund of the amount we erroneously Paid,
1 Hereby apply for the refund of the abov"s Abed texas and certify that the Information I have given on this form
is true and Corr"("
January 20, 1987
t
Signature Date of Application for Tax Refund
111 iVi •yrrrr-,.-_ rr__-_--r-_-----_-.._r____-____. ---------r-----___r
F rl
DETERMINATiON FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval
E
Signature of Authorlssd Officer Data
Vi
M Signature of Pr#slding Off 100e) of Taxing Data
` .j nit(s) for refund applications over $500
Any person ache hakes a Mae
ankf' WM Me fapelrlg reseed ehaM M wyeal td ens el IIu feNowln* pemMtlee; 1. imprMalmenl of
net mate then 110 years two Ices than a Veen and/ar a Me of nth mute than 14,000 of both such Mu and
110411semmmib a. eerMUnlent to ~aII for s lenll up k 1 Vesr er a M1e nel to erased /4,000 er iwth euoh Nne arse Imprfeonrnenl w aN
" # M "s4"0" 31.10, Ps" cede.
' 30 COLLECTIONS
e
'i
1~°°• •r.<.~ S.:su: ,rk:x,,.Firp.-.kmn:~k a,wF:`3w1iM" a
a
TREL 394001201
TAX YEAR 06 REAL ESTA rE O.USINESS TAX F ILES
ACCT NUMBER 394901200 DI:;1'I.AY ONLY
NAME OWENP ROBERT W
ADDRESS) 3106 SANTA MONL
CA
ADDRESS2
CITY-ST-ZIP
DENTON TX76205
OCAS ID 23363 TAXABLE VALUE $108009,00
LOCATION 3106 SANTA MONICA
LEGAL 1 MONTECITO ADON. BLOCK Av LOT 1
LEGAL 2 2v 12/287-A///A GIBSON 498
LAST CHANCE 00/00/00
i ASSED_VALUE !193.409.00
.'VET EXEMP (00) 000
1 LOAN CO COOL
_ 00000 E
TAX f1r111.61 -k
SAL DUE fir111.61
Ab ~op W
~ ~96I T £ X30 ♦ ~
E
of DENS N
1AX pEf cK N W
wo" tEXI~
1 - •j ,
fYl
t
3 IM 1
I
1
atAwNt 1~ 7 7 6 6
1 ♦
*IwltN
~~IARf
* 21 01
a
L* a
1 a • ...~..L~.
qqM
r
~ .4
1 I s
1 ~ ~ f r is
N ! •
xr.,k•c~ 1 K• '
r
JAW 09 JA W 09
jr,
f v ~i•rr 1
!art i- " • ?i"~fi~~
ILA
.2 Cl 1)
1 SJ % •
Yh# A f•• ' f
8
.
Y i
ry~ ri~ikSh ~-iSkfar a,.v -«ax.r7ljr~.'t~.~l~~~rJ ~17.'~'. l.f•.rr~a$i. ika'~.y1<fk tr!
a
S~ r
P
7
i ,
KARL CHECKS PAYAILC T0:
CITY OF OCNTON TAX 011TAgTMlNT
3
3990-011CO 191b 1
pCfi'lll ~
i
II YOuq $I CILL *0 CHICK
, l
f PLIAi! JItT{MtN T!H=
ti 1 STUB WiTM PAymoff i
s' w j ff ~
hr
~ 5 1 ~ .,,{3]9]3
ry L ' , - , • A
y -_......v..>ry,y.,,~=..,-_.. trv':~'Aii.1~a'4:Ye73.:yw~'i•#~
C
I
i
I!, ±A 11 PH
3
•
Ah ~
Ri+
P!`.4
f
)i
1
,I r
r
A a
~ f
~ Ih
Gr i~
ham. 1
i
1
1 -
nr
1 1.
i
r
r.
IIIIII III fill
a~ r~ 1•.
If I 1 -171
v.
b '
1. • G
c, i r
qq .^!A Mii"~ji:'.MFN11W ~i,KM1YtM'df M.1° !sn
W
i
~ b
F'
w Ci7yof DENM, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.82x0
January 20, 1987
ry' ; TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Victor Schneider, Tag Tecnhician
^a. THRU: William J. Anderson, Assistant Director of Finance
a SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund r
RECOMMENDATION +
Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued.
`n r' I SUMMARY:
Chapter 31. 11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the
approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for re-
funds in excess of $500.00. Taxpayer, Lawyers Title of
Denton, has requested a refund in the amount of $813.11
for double payment of property tax account 7198-00400.
' BACKGROUND: j
Taxes were paid for Mr, Gary Flemmons by his mortgage com-
pany on December e, 1988. His property was sold on Decem-
,j ber 11, 1988 with Lawyers Title of Denton handling the
closing and Lawyers Title also paid these taxes at'the
time of closing. Our records indicate a total; of $1,228.22
was paid against a base of $813,11, Lawyers Title of
Denton is requesting a refund of the difference.
F'I;SCAL_ IMPACT:
$813.11 to be refunded, i
Respectfully submitted:
400
Victor +n'al e~`r
y.
Tax Technician
F' 1
~s y am Anderson
f~ Assista Director of Finance
~'*y
xr,°,f
. . . . w ALA x.11
i
Swig P,owty r.. "we APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
ptluMA(rfNeeUon ~Lt1111at)
Collecting Office Name. City of Dantnn T x Offiea
Collecting Tex For: City of Dpntnn
(Iax n nits
215 F McKinney Denton Texas 78201
+ Address -
city, Stott, Zip Code
r t,
: i
In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the Is Payer.
{
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNIER:
Name: 1
Addeos -E-0- Box 158& DD E885_?S?Oti I
Telephone Number (if additional information is needed):. SRR-70n7 -
Y IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY:
, / nn r
Description of Property Timber Oakc ERtairpa, Slack C- IM d a
-
ccoun Location Pro
Address
or*trl y 9 81A 00400 or Tax Receipt Number:
Account Number of Pr operfy: _ - `
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES:
Name of Taxing Unit YNr for Amount of
From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund
Is Requested Is Rputeted Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested
' f tCity of Denton 10 88 12-09 / 1q 86 1 813.11 1 _ -0-
813.11 +
2City of Denton 1q - A 12--1.1 / 19 -$fi-- = A13.11 $
3. 10
' i
Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation}: Saxes paid by mort¢a¢e comoanv
and by title company. Lawyers Title is reauestin¢ a refund of A813.11
Paid by them (canceled check attached)
w' "I hereby apply for the refund of the above4lescribed taxes and certify that the Information I have given on this form
? is true and cofract"
Signature ..4.-yr..v Date of Application for Tax Refund
i ..,....r..
r~ DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval
rc Signature of Authorized Officer Date
Signature Of Presiding Officos► of Taxing Date ,
Unit(s) for refund applications over 1000
Arty pawn who makes a lei" on" upon the Wstelntl reeerd shall be subjeal I* one of ft IaNewing psaw": 1. ImpAee "wd N
Act more, then 10 years nor low than 3 years and/at a One of net nrae Ihsn 18,000 at loth sueh OM, and
Irnorlso" nl; A. ao"A"on" In NO for a lean t* b 1 year of a One net to exceed 12,000 at teeth such not and logo a mM so set
s; ferdr In Seagon 31,10, P"al Cede.
AlIN4 it it
30 COLLECTIONS I
y~
1~ '
j
Car
M
4
~ r
♦ yLAWYERS TITLE OF DENTON OF, Dv a►.
SIS waT oAx rH. t617> 4s4uu 12105186
4^~ ✓~.r• - DKMVN. TEXAS 76101 OATS
. ,
a r r r":1~! ,~~•~7+ ?,:r ~ r neM'~ „ N~ • 1418IG t
g- -41287 -g L0 GARY Z:LEM~O 9 Gills d
nl~ wo "
r ` 9IX HUNDRED THIRTEEN S'll ENTS II
PAY► } s*~~*~*~~+~+~~*R613. 11
~t
y+ ti AMOUNT
r r
tAWY&MI TMA D. DION"ll ,
CITY 0! DENTON TAY DEFT.'
d ~y
Y4e.. VotO AR[II 60 DAVI h
M 1@000L4&a?No 1:1119147421; Mot sass 8r' 1000oonG131
?t
'S• Y g, i
ztl~ i
Af ~iE y ,r ,
v,
3 d.•' ...w.e ,,~be„ y; r.ttCt~~' 'v~rY~,~+~1 •~;+NF +4t✓O
•
I
w,yf ,
r• r
r ~j FF 3
d.17 N 3-' . ,
-7 Ft - 7t, f
~ORV-vE~~3 '
r'
44 X15+\ . , • *i
35ab ° ~ is •
71,
• Grp r `~S r s 5 1 1
I 4-
S
44
ltt. 1 1 4, 1Y • . '11
.
+j a ,y..-..-e. ...n.'r_wF,•i4l1~lG'.Y.i.EYgfi11~~IM.PUi7G~ifW XYa'i
i 999
. Y
~.'r • ~ q+l ~ ~ , ~ . a ~ 16
S Y
.
t
j
4 J,
.
P
~f5~.. •W'+.e'~:sW1'q',~v~ ~q~iA~:'.4 a✓sW'++tb.!'X9: ~r6~~#r
r
y
, l . I
DATE: 02/03/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM., Lloyd Harrell, City Manager E
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Northridge Subdivision,
Lots 4-9 and 11-13, Block 2
RECOMMENDATION: `
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the of the Blockm2r,a at itstmeeti g ofrJanuary 28,1987lon, Lots 4-9 and 11-13,
~a
S
SUMMARY: j k
x Nine single family lots are proposed along the south side of Windsor
Drive between Mesquite Street and the termination of Carroll
k~ y Boulevard.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
s-
4 g Property owners
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
Res ully subm t d: s,
o arre
City Manager
' Prepared by.
w
av son 1,
Senior Planner j
t Ap ,
lift
Jeff
Director of Planning '
and Develoomnt
us
i
'
fr
k
r
I
r"
OF )'011A
f>T
rop M _ I
t
1
APO
• i t 4 .~'c,y; rqK'Efa~Y4,I.~4`aSJfi~i.M~i..in,~'e.~ iA'a:;r✓
au
try,
i
1
k N
r
I I j
I
~ j
r I
t~j
F; .4t. I
L -
Sj ~ rYL~• .Yn r ~ (/I j
'•r I i
,1 a
11f
r
1 jmv~' ! 1
.
I 1
e r
` : ~ ~ Sall NYAIaY aSYa't1 { J
56
y;~ inwur~luwsnlt.:
Ou BWUri SM91
7 t` k~Mn -lam w4A b
l.Iq O71Y riROA I!
41 --iftii "A
a %O7NO 0177iOA
Vasil of
t
a I
r
I
• ' r - '
14IW1YV40 XYl NOLNIO 0 Alq INJAI%IVd IO kill NOl NIO 10 A111
I 'Ol IbVAV/ Now 1krW 101 I'IIVAVd IIIOINO INVW
~~7 1
,ter
I
i
DATE: 02/03/81
<j
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM1 Lloyd Varrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of the Northridge Subdivision,
Lots 4-9 and 11-13, Block 2
k REC OME NAT I ON:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the
at plat of the Northridge Subdivision, Lots 4-9 and 11-13,
Block 20 at its meeting of January 28, 1981. ;
` SUMMARY:
Nine single family lots are proposed along the south side of Windsor
r x Drive between Mesquite Street and the termination of Carroll
Boulevard,
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS DR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Property owners
FISCAL IMPACT:
s,
Undetermined
ll' Res ully fubm t d:
o arm j
w~ City Manager 4
k
' Prepared by,.
av son
Senior Planner
1y e
Ap V
r
rF tae; ~ "
~ e
Director of Planning
and Developuent
r ,,f
7 a ' «.....(.,uv,n. Irv. i'Nir~ r~+•+w~-A.cw, k.+RF«~1P- "
r ~WeNtrva.. a1aw ,LLMi(aMr»t 4Yn.
L 41
4
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
g
' MEETING DATE; February 30 1987
w"- SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Northridge Subdivision,
Lots 4-9 and 11-13, Block 2
SUMMARY: Nine single family (SF-10) lots are proposed
along the south side of Windsor Drive (secondary
Y' major arterial) between Mesquite Street and the
r: termination of Carroll Boulevard. The lot sizes
shown on the plat conform to zoning ordinance
requirements. A request for a change in zoning
from single family (SF-10) to two family (2-F)
was denied in 1984.
No street or utility improvements are required
for this develoJ))ment but access is obviously a
major issue. The owner and the Development
Review Committee have agreed to recommend an
i ` access plan that calls for a 20' front access
easement and concrete driveway that will prob
ably double a3 a sidewalk, The concept is very ;
' similar to that existing along the east side of
Ector Street and discussed in connection with
' the Lethgeber decision.
V .
Two owners of adjoining unplatted property were '
asked to participate in the dedication of the
access easement to avoid requests for more
individual driveways in the future= they were
not cooperative.
k~ Sixteen Inch (1611) water and 6" sewer are in
place and adequate. All other public utilities
are in place nr available for extension. Drain-
age in the area his been a question and a drain-
age system to prevent water from these lots being
ra.. dumped onto adjacent lots must be designed at the
final plat stage.
ACTION REQUIREDs Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends 1
approval of the preliminary plat with the con-
dition that plans for a drainage system will
be submitted with the final plat.
f. ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
17949
~ ...!;..n'aj...L11,.te.4a'f.aY.. a.:.wy:LYi ♦.A,',.'''a=,nc.,uK:v+'a7
RP
i
1
"'S t
11, 1 u 'r
1 •.1d. 1.•1. 1r r. to n.Il tr i 1141 fro I• too TAN 1•r
.•I 1 111 .1161 r r.•r .y Irl oil r'• 1 .0 1 HM 1116! I111
r.lf oflrlflt• 11411.110ollJv ♦II11~11III.IV
Note 1•..1 '111. to, r;. '1. 1nr/111 It 1.11161. t1Jg1 r41ItNt111•
1 46.1 61.1 1.111 r.l. ' o"'. dl J 1146 1 It", 11 let 6 1.16 Ir lot tnr
~bll 64011.14 I'll' I •rr•l p•/1 II IP111•.f 11 1 1111 0 066 oll
1'J Il• III PQ • 1. .......1 / r. Ir4 lit 1.f to "I's I1 r4111Hf161•
I'trn I16. It" ~II IP u• 1 ••14 e•.ur, nu 1•H p• U, N616u+
I'.1•.1r Mllllnan
fM/N WIY •f'• \ /
I •".n.rnlll .1 111 e. rrf ll.ir dr I.r Ir11 u1vI 11114
lit wMMA61111DVar ! I l w.lly l / 1m4rry to • r..nl r 1111 r . 1 e • M I . •r . 1 6 11, It
P
• .41 1 . 1 . U e.v.u
Cow ItL 1 I I I. • II rl r 6 Il •L.f. 1.
M M~~{1f
rr.t1
• .IM IwW\M.M I 11 11161~.M irIr~L'iY I% r 1 r .1 . .ir • .r. p •1 L.a
~ M 6611 J i .r 'r. • y1 1 . r. 1 r n • / r..,
/ [!'.61111. n.•Y IIw1r I•r 116
II~,••r •I• • .1, ''rPll•t.l•
.I . N 1.1,14 TI f •
~'1I 1 I • WM • y
.r I ~ 1 « r ~ 1 • ~ . ~ r .b r. •p' . ♦ 1 i • y• 1'316 ull i~ .
rf' H•.11 I '1 1 Y11 1.
1 1 ill: y; . a a S r , .I r...
t. I lIw~/61 40 oc 61. 0r1.~ No • .r,r6 I«M . . .L.
III r. „ , ft 1.111
_ _ 1 . • 16 H 1 I 66.14 1 '
Y
'VI 1'•1.1 y 1• .1 11'1 III H 1.1
.w1114/ ~^1 l 11.. .r'r
r 1 1 1 / 1 11 1 1 t 10 1••
rf6 111 l /Ma.M I Ill[ l•/1I ~/M . KN 1 r I . I . 1 r •4
r •rL~1 111 l 1/•~~l~rl..r...-~~ inn •ItirN Ilr. .~~L. it. 1•i • YI'..1111//•
3 It.
' r • 1 .1r 1• 1 1 1 r • r H 1 ..9111.4
. } y1.p1 t 1 . r 111 M •r 1 . 46.114
•IN.M 1111
1MI YIfY i1"1111\'M~ I 111. 1111 111:•6
I
li,.,. "k :l y t» N; •r.
N
rl i r' 1 • iir•1 i
Irr IIw1N111NVq.tl ~i b MN . • ' INM 1 •
. • I ~ . NM 1111
. .I
106 twN IN N 1161[ NYMtl. 1N1N~1~/1y ~f1Y161Y pn 1 • H N to
N
40 low"
a. so" 11416 ~I MN16W61NYW 11 NNN r • M 1 . I~~ r 116NI . . 1 r r~11 r.
Lot
.10" 9 "64 111 eW11Y mIIM1N NM. M .
111 LMM 1111. M F$
IIR / I/IIP/ M 11+1atIR q' S f 'r"
t N// M IMMII61 tIN r I
L, MMr Iq wMll~t~ ' ~ 1 r ' t.
. 1, IM/M.Y 11/1 nl r . r r 61... . ; I wr.uif r•
I • I r• 511.1111p;. p
`1 1 't Wk I6.1•.
q u 6 . , 'I Y~'1 •ryrf
1, too 6 Y IV Ad-M-Jw
1 .
6 f
ML WAIARY P_ 0
111 P.
N41SafTt L MAID NC. MOIIIg110~[Il~OM1CN.MlHtwCYli1 I ; 1
at. 6 1 6 M J w 41 tw M 0lIM01
41 v tIMItUi i llwlkNM '
/NIIIM/' r MMINI 1 11 1.1.1116W1' g1fa1 MINI. 1O1!
i
i•
. t
wok' . ' '
3
, 4
1 ~
14
k
~s
a
M1
fr 7~ '
h 4L{
ti
%
c ~
~ I•
iP f
Y r
Y L
r
h r f k
I ,
r
yy..
` a
~I c'ytx; °i A"
qX
1 _ ..~.+«a.y'•~y~t~N+~A4~-y~,~~v.~v~': {~1°,.Fip`~Mca'~Y#ix l~rv` ,t ~Y,t~
l
r d ri°+ r iY4~ n
' CITY COUNCIL REPORT DATE: 2/3/87
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 1
E
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT; Bid / 9692 Rental of Street Construction Equipment
~
t PACONKMATION.6 We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest and most
r t
responsible bidder meeting specifications, Dustrol Corporation for the annual
w estimated amount of $110,000.00. The cost are estimated for the total projects
x' but reflect a considerable savings to the City over standard methods of street
ka, resurfacing. The actual disbursement of funds will be on a per project
completion basis. Projects will depend on available dollars.
giAl Y. This bid is for'the'daily rental of equipment with qualified
operators for street paving and reconstruction of existing asphalt street using
a method of recycling existing asphalt and resurfacing with a blend of old and
new asphalt. The City Street Department intends to furnish all support equipment
? such as trucks, and barricades as well as support personnel as required. The
machinery being rented is not available in our motorpool fleet. This recycling/
resurfacing concept is relatively new to the City. We have participated in this
type activity on Thomas, Emery and Stanley streets. This trial project was found
to be very successful and cost effective.
t~
The daily rental of the equipment instead of bidding the specific street projects
permit o utilitation'of our support staff" and, equipment as our o chedule Willi
permit, a flexible work schedule, the ability to change project and/or street
k selection depending upon changing circumstances, and above all allows better
utilization of available funds for upgrading of City StreRts.
Mr. Jim Corbin, Street Superintendent, Mr. Rodger McDaniel %gineering Technician
Supervisor and I have completed an extensive evaluation of the bids submitted.
We have visited with both contractors and reel°xed their machinery and discussed
their method of operation. We have talked with the references supplied to u tby
both vendors grid have thoroughly compared each. offering. We have various width of paving operatione,depth of heat penetration, daily square footage
yield average production, maneuverability, work history and several'less
significant areas of comparison, i.e. age of equipment, design etc.
' The bid of Cutler Repaving although lower in price per hour failed to bid toe
r.
3
comple+e list of required. machinery. They have recently made an offering
supply the previously 170 BID milling machine and pick up broom. We cannot accept
this after the bid opening proposal and further more the equipment offered does
S.' not meet our specification or the Request Time Schedule.
After a much more extensive evaluation than previously preformed, we feel the J
r bid of Dustrol is the best and most responsible bid for the City of Denton.
i
j
f
Zt Y'I t
a
y
0923L
F
j
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
` AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORMS OR IMPROVEPIZNTS; PROVIDING
Its, FOR Thi EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN j
1 E EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
t.° competitive bids for the construction of pustate law blic works
and
ff: improvements in accordance with the procedures
¢ City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
' received and recommended that the herein described bids are the
s lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals
and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE,
it THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0: DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
A, That the following competitive bids for the construction of
public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita-
tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached
hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest
responsible bids:
BID 1:UMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
9692 DUSTROL CORPORATION $110,000.00
~t it
9 ~ z
1,4
SECTION 11.
"Y That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive 1
bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the
person submitting the bid 'for construction of such public works
or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person
shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to
Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and
i
F
r1H.au. n,1lr. a.L .r S Y. '-al
t,
furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification
of the award of the bid.
SECTION Iii.
' That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all
necessary written contracts fot the performance of the
construction of the public works or improvements in accordance
with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such
contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and
Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the
' terms conditions plans and specifications, standards,
quantities and specified sums contained therein.
x SECTION IV.
` That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive
bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and
improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby
~s.. authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
amount. as specified in such approved bids and authorized E
' contracts executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V.
That, this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
M, y PASSED AND APPROVED this the 3 day of FEBRUARY , 1987.
r -`dti O -
RAY STEFHENSo u.
i': f CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN Gr "Y
ITY OF DENTON,oTEXAS ECRETARY
C
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEW ADAMI DRAYOVITC1t, CITY ATTORNEY
` CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
4.
Y
BY:
PAGE TWO
- .G`t .t e..~, „Y.'vv t. n,n.<k:ru~''r•t wdk-bsf
Y
"
fit:
46,
• W. 6Va Yi:1V: V i ate. ~'a. X,~: ::C .^T ~ ..1 ya....!' lal a:::9 vd.'~:V'.
"i
III FT-FTTTT-1
y
1
fr' 1
h ~4
Cr Yi.
z"
,z
v
V y.A J
+a i
i ,
N
. fir ~ •
4n u
v
~I
r f.`
L 4 ~ l
v4 {
~ ~ M I
Y P.
[9 L ♦ 9 1 (
1 171
3♦.. y:«
Y ,r
Yry
li
6IA
r. a
~f •
d
JIII[
'a3 a 2sK♦ ~ ~f{'~i)ba.a0 w•aa'^'ar.r_ , _
y
.•'~'V♦MYF1t~\9NJPt1W~w... _~~y~y [~µy~@$ ~y~~~~`
FIFA P^°"^'
s
i
spp:
r~ 1 f r`
A.
.
1
f# CITY COUNCIL REPORT
r T0: Mayor and Member of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
DATE: February 3, 1987 j
SUBJECT: BID N 9692 Rental of Street Construction Equipment f
R6COOMATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest and most
responsible bidder meeting specification, Dustrol Corporation for the annual
estimated amount of $110,000.00. The cost are estimated for the total projects
but reflect a considerable savings to the City over standard methods of street
resurfacing. The actual disbursement of funds will be on a per project
completion basis. Projects will depend on available dollars.
SLNWY: This bid is for the daily rental of equipment with qualified -
operators for street paving and reconstruction of existing asphalt street using
a method of recycling existing asphalt and resurfacing with a blend of old and 3
new asphalt. The City Street Department intends to furnish all support equipment
g such as trucks, and barricades as well as support personnel as required. The I
machinery being rented is not available in our motorpool fleet. This recycling/
resurfacing concept is relatively new to the City. We have participated in this
type activity on Thomas, Emery and Stanley streets. This trial project was
,j found to be very successful and cost effective.
° j The daily rental of the equipment instead of bidding the specific street projects
permit utilization of our support staff and equipment as our schedule will
permit, a flexible work schedule, the ability to change project and/or street
selection depending upon cAanging circumstances, and above all allows better
utilization r, of available funds for upgrading of City Streets.
' Mr. Jim Corbin, Street Superintendent, Mr. Roger McDaniel Engineering Technician
j Supervisor and I have completed an extensive evaluation of the bids submitted.
We have visited with both contractors and reviewed their machinery and discussed
their method of operation. We have talked with the referen^es supplied to us by
both vendors and have thoroughly compared each offering. We have considered the
various width of paving operations, depth of heat penetration, daily square footage
yield average production maneuverability, work history and several other
significant areas of comparison, i.e. age of equipment, design etc.
v ° The bid of Cutler
Repaving although lower in price per hour failed to bid the ~
complete list of required machinery. They have recently made an offering to
supply the milling machine and pick up broom, they didn't previously include in '
their bid. By law and charter restrictions we cannot accept this after the bid
- opening proposal and further more the equipment offered does not meet our
specification of the request time schedule.
After a much more extensive evalution than previously preformed we feel the
x bid of Dustrol is the best and most responsible bid for the City of Denton,
k
it. ..n.
r
w r
,
page -2-
BIDd 9692
BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet
~ 31111 '
Asp
7.' PROM M5, DEPARTMENT OR GROUP AFFECTED: Street Department
FISCAL IMPACT: 1986/87 Budget Funds ACCTN 100-020-0033-8303
' Respectfully submitted:
kt'f
~ I.
Rk
xr oy . Harrell-
City-Marager
y l Pf pared by;
Name:' Tom 0. Shaw, C.D.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
a ' k approved;
>RaMe: John J. Marshall, C•P.M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
v
r»4 z
N a
Sy
h
f'
, e...t.w• yAV;µ.. s•~ ,tr'e..a.'nBM;'aJ~W"l.t x.r,+''W:H h4L:4^Y ,W*:.f+«
Y 1, x i r ~
F
a y s s "YYII
r;
W;
i
~r
t
rry
f 1 +
4 r-
,
I<;; 1 I i I
BID N 9692 1 T.K.O. 1 DUSTROL I CUTLER '1 1
BID 7I7LE RENTAL STREET EQUIPMENT I EQUIPMENT I I REPAVIt'G i t
OPENED 12/18/86 2100 P.M. I i t t I
sr, ACCOUNTH I I I I 1
1 l S r 1
------------------i-------------I-------------I-------------- 1------
# I PTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1
--1-------------------------I-------------I--------------I--------------I-------------1
1. I 1HEATER I NO BID 1 600.00 i I t
1A. 1 :MOBILIZATION CHARGE I 100.00 t I I
' 2. I IHEATER SCARIFIER i I 850.00 t 650.00 1 I
2A. I IMOBILIZATION CHARGE I I 104). 00 1 500.00 I I
1MIXING RECYCLER 1 1 5°0.00 1 1
Pr` ."3A. I IMOPILIZATION CHARGE 1 1 150.00 1 I 1
4. 1 ILAYDOWN MACHINE I I 700.00 1 400.00 1
4A. I !MOBILIZATION CHARGE I 1 150.00 3 100.00
S. I IPNEUMATIC ROLLER 1 1 250.00 1 225.00 1 I
SA. I IM66ILIZATION CHARGE 1 1 100.00 1 100.06 1 i
ITAN06H STEEL ROLLER 1 I 250.00 1 225.00 1 I
IMORILIZATION CHARGE 1 1 100.00 1 100.00 1 I
7. I (MILLING MACHINE 1 I 29500.00 1 NR I i
7A. .I 1MOOILIZATION CHARGE 1 I 250.00 1 NO I I
8. I (LIQUID TANKER,, I I 75.00 I 150.00 1 L
CIA. I iMODILiZkiw CHARGE 1 I 200.00 1 100.00 I
9. 1 'IPICKU0 BROOM I I 550.40 I NB 1
9A. I IM091L:120ION CHARGE I 1 100.00 1 NO I i
10. 1 IWATER TRUCK 1 1 200.00 1 200.00 I 1
10A.I IMOGILIZATION CHARGE I I 100.00 I 100.00 1 !
I I t I 1 t i
1r
1
3
w
4 ;
s,
s
r
I
...mow - ..a, f
i.
ry ' `
A IL-L!
ri
G, Y• •
F4 1
.
I L
r
k a {
t
4 1,II.
I~Ik N~ I ~l y
J
n
{~q,,
.q
F
T +9
' J
i
q i
~ waar
,'r, , - - ._...,~.rvw:s4xh;x x.+v:....„,.. i(4Y.7,A.'~. FMa~•Y'n;,i+Hr;.
dyte3 w:..s,a. ar.,..._.... W
` 3
i
0923L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; j
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
j
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
W;' competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of 1
# state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
y. reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies "
r; or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor;
i` and
WHEREAS, the City Council has pprovided in the City Budget
for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of
the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and
accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
s That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid
s: Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as
being'the lowest responsible bids for such items:
Ayr f BID ITEM
~t NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
-ALL B 6 M TREICK EAl1iP11FNt $ 33.972.00
9701 - ALE. INC. _ ,310.80
C~tAYBAfl ELECTRIC. INC. 20 20.310.00
SUPPLY 16111
00
ALL CUMtINS SUPPLY 48.399.00
SECTION 11.
That bythe acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
Y
W. r ~ ..919191.
i
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
" Proposals, and related documents,
SECTION 111.
That should the City and persons submitting approved and {
` t accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his E
designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the {
written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
ti the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums
contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein
approved and accepted. I
SECTION IV. i
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
' accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein,
y SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 3 day of February , 1987, i
t' RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST: j
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS j
{
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADA.yI DRAYOViTCH, CITY ATTORNEY 1
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
rl
Y . ' PAGE TWO
R
txa;
}
I ,
DATE: February 3,•1987
i
{ CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
' FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID / 9699 TRUCK BoDIFs AND CRANE
ry
' RECOIlENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest responsible
' bidder, B and M Truck in the total amount of $33,972.00 for all three Items.
S1RY: This bid is for the Truck mounted Utility Eodiea and Hydraulic cranes t0
be mounted on truck cab/chassis supplied by the City of Denton. These trucks are
motorpool replacements and the chassis were approved by council 1219/86.
iACKGRO*: Tabulation Sheet
A 1
{ PROD" DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Motorpool operations and water and {
r,=, E
sewer u y. !
FISCAL IMPACT: 1986/87 Budget Funds from water and sewer utility and motorpool
=s, r
rep cement funds.
Qt
Respectfully submitted:
A/ ZZ
I
Lloyd r'
City nager'
2f f ~
Prepared by:
Nape: Tom SMv } 3
Title: Asst. Purchasing Agent
° Approved:
` awe? hn Marahali ;i
t rr mu.' Purchasing Agent
AX,
r~
„r
.
:
sx
II
1 1 I I ! 1 I
P1@ 1 F 9694 I DAVIS I MOTOR I UTILITY I PERFECTION I 1 6 N 1 I
III TITLE 1R10 BODIES It CRANE I U71LIlY I TRUCK 1 EAUIPIFENT I EBUIFMENT 1 TRUCK 1 I
OPENED 1121187 2111 P.R. 1 HYDRAULICS I EIUIFII£NT I CO. I I EDu1FMENI 1 I
r, ACCOT11114 1 I SERVICE I I I 1 t 1
I t I 1 1 I I
1...._........f-------------l------------- 1--------------------------1
1 I ITY I ITEM DESCRIPTION t VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR i VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR
----1- ! 1--1-------------1-•-----------1-------------1-------------1-------------1 1
T I I ! l I I 3
2 G 1 3 IUlluiv BODY Ie4I I 4,116.88 f 11931.11 1 21786.11 1 2,3M.18 1 11842.18 1 l
' 1 I I I ! I I I I
q 2: 1 2 1 TTLITY CRANE 1141 1 COMBIN0 IN 1 3,911.11 1 51115.11 1 41368.81 1 31.45.11 T I
f I 17EK 1 3 1 I I I 1 !
1 2 15HO LI HYDRAULIC CRANE 1 15,688.01 1 •11,379.16 1 11,778.11 1 119765.18 f 11,883.18 1 I
t i 1 I I I I I 1
'r `t t 1 I ALTERNATE I OPTION 1 3 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 18 3 ELECTRIC f 1,691.11 ! f f 1
i 1 i I I 1
~°h 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I
e I I DELIVERY 1 45-61 DAYS 131-61 DAYS 1 91.121 DAYS 1 61 DAYS f 31 DAYS I :
~ f 1 f I 1 i t 1
f f' t I 1 I 1
1 I 1 1 I 1 1 i
1 I I I I t 1 t 1
Y
d
~
DATE: February 3, 1987
CITY COUNCIL Rc'PORT k
!
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
I
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
1 SUBJECT: DID # 9101 Fiberglass Brackets
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting
' apecification, Terple Inc. In the total ac-ount of $13,682.80.
, e f
y
SWIl4ARY: This bid Is for the purchase of Fiberglass type cross arms and
y, i.n'sulator brackets for "slimline" style overhead electrical distribution
construction.
This material is replacement for warehouse stock. The lower total price
quoted by Priester 41 is for a brand not currently on our approved list.
ti
" BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet.
i,
r PjaW EIEPARTNEATS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Warehouse And electric distribution.
FISCAL INPABT: 1986/87 budget funds for working capital inventory.
7' " ' Account number 710-043-0582-8708
,
.
f 1
Respeetfuli submitted:
a F~,
Lloyd Y Harrell
City Manager,
Pre ared by: R
G Aj R&C Tom Shaw
r Title: Asst. Purchasing Agent
kr! 1' { Approved:
,g
ogi blin J. Marshall
a Tlt1tl! Purchasing Agent
• .i.~'uY*W.,I lati«v _ WW414iA r +trY!A•v..,.... w:4 N
W 41Kr.{+ik~ O,'.~rpF~
%
k
I I ! 1 I I ! I 1
110 1 14711 1 NESCO I TEMPLE I PDLELIRE I CUMMINS I PRIESTER I PRIESTER I BAAYIAR I NELSON i•
111 TITLE FIDEWAS6 BRACKETS I t INC. I ELECTRIC I SUFPLY 1 SUPPLY I SUPPLY I ELECTRIC I ELECTRIC I
OPmS 11211812111 P.M. I I I I I IT 1 62 1 i I
ACCOUN71 711-143-1562.1719 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
I I ! I I I t I 1
I ITY; I ITEM 0ESCRTPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
T .............I.._.__...°-•1------•__-a..1.. - I-.........._.I
1 i 3 1 I I i I T
1. 1 ill IME INSULATOR BRACKET 1 38.91 T 35.88 1 3641 1 39.21 1 37.31 1 36.31 I N0, 61D 1 42.51 1
1 I I I 1 I I I I 1
2,° 1 w IDEA END CROSSNRM I 91.71 1 9339 ! 111.95 1 118.11 I B2.11 1 96.81 t 1 113.25 1
t I T ! 1 I I 1 t I l
3. ` 1 u 1CUT-IUT/ARRESTER Nov 1 4.62 1 45.11 1 44.41 1 49.61 1 48.61 1 15.63 1 1 $3.33 1
I I I I I I I I I 1
• ~ I I I 1 1 3 I
IRAOf-1N 1 i t I i I ! I 3
1. I f I I 1 I t 1 1 I
4k I :/7 ISTANDOFF &,ACKET I I 1 1 .63 1 I I I I
{ t I S I 1 T I T f
41. I 1~t ; 1001 R18NT PURCHASE I I 1 1 .57 T t 3 I I
I' I. I I 1 I I I I I 1
! 1 MIMI t 1 41-61 DAYS 1 4-6 WKS 1 1 4-6 WS 1 64 NKS 1 1 45-61 DAYS I
{ I I 1 t I 1 1 1 I r
t .I I I I I t I I I I
1 I I I I I I r I T
6.
ru.•...... .....,...nn-. ...,..._.w_...•-„w._+n•.•4AR MKM.saW'ei1FMItIMM1i.RWMS41V.^+Mwr..n~ .....T'-~-.
r i r
lr
1
w ~4
s DATE: February 3, 1987
,r I
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
70: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID f 9704 3 PHASE DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS
i .
f
` RECOMf1ENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated
b er as to ows:
ITEM N 1 to Graybar Electric for a total of $20,310.00
ITEM N 2 to Cummins Supply for a total of 13,332.00
ITEM d 3 to Priester Supply for a total of 16,688.00
" r TOTAL BID AWARD $50,330.00
SUMMITRY: This bid is for the purchase of three phase distribution
transformers. These items are used in the maintenance and new construction
of the electric distribution system.
?S I
BACIWBV: Tabulation sheet
MI p
•
r w I pI, X011S. DEPARTI4EI1TS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
v
Electric Distribution Department
r,' FISCAL IMPACT: 1986187 Budget funds ACCOUNT d 611-008-0252-9222
" Respectful submitted:
{
Lloyd Harrell
City Manager
Prep'arad by: ,
llamas Tom D. Shaw, C.P.N.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
' Approved:
Imes, ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M.
tha~inn Anant a,.w{
r n..i4 iiJiY4e:v!/.+r wWWl.n„{~fItAV'M11{~'^~*WI':9"AP2~~ A
1
•'J
' I I I ! I i 1 1 I !
P!D 1 9714; I TEApS 1 NESLO I VAN IRAN I SRAYEAR I IEMFLE I CUMMINS 1 DUSENBERRY I FRIESIER I PRE181E4 1
Ill! 1111E I ~11SIRIDUTION TRANS 1 ELECTRICAL I 1 I ELEIFRIC I INC. I SUFFIY I I SUPPLY I SUPPLY I
OPENED '1121117 2111 P.M. 1 PRODUCTS I f S I I I t 1 1 I 1 2 1
ACCOlN111 6lI-118-IZ51-9272 I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1
I f I I 1
1
I...---------- 1-------------f............. 1------------- 1............. 1............. 1--_-------___I------------- 1••--•-••.....1
! I I DIY. I ITEII DESCRIPTION I VENDOR VENDOR I VENODA i VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR
I
is}.•- - 1 _.---•---------•-•----_t-------------f------------- I............. I------------- 1............. 1-------------
. r I r I I I 1 I I I i }
I. 1 b 11510A FAD TRANSFORMERS 1 31676.11 1 1 1,211.11 1 31385.11 1 4,445.11 1 3,464.10 1 NO @ll 1 31743.11 1 31525.10 1
f I 1 I I I 1 I
j 2. 1 3 13H 00 PA7 TRANSFORMERS 1 4,613.18 1 41927.00 1 51111.11 1 51134.11 1 5,132.11 1 41444.01 1 1 49749." 1 3,162." I
11 f} 1 ! I I I I I I ! I I I
3. I 2 1151 kVA PAD TRANSFORMERS 1 9,127.11 f 11,452.01 1 9,235.11 1 9,181," 1 91536.81 1 8,516.11 r 1 81341." 1 ymol I
I I t I I I 1 I I ! }
1 ~ r I I I I I I
1 I KWACTURER I FATRAI-EO 1 I$STINO- I VAM IRAN I SO. 1 I D.E. I IIOMAFD I I KOR N I ATE I
i I I 1 HOUSE I I I I 1 I I 1
1 I I i ! I I I I I
1 I I I ~axcry![onf I I I I I 1 , I
I I r 1 1 I I t 3 I I I
I I 1 1 16.16 INS I I I I I I I I
! ! ! I I I 1 I I I I 1
I I I 1 i f 1 I I t
I. I, I I I t I ! 1 1 I I
y P ` ,
. i
J
,rr
J,
y
AUMT115 DENTON
MEMORANDUM
i ~TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FRCM: E. B. Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
DATE: January 26, 1987
SUBJECT: Bid Number A
apt The Electric Distribution transformers on Bid 9704 have been evaluated
for total cost as follows:
Delivery
Time Total
s. r Item Description Quantity (Weeks) Supplier MFG Unit Price Prise
' 1 150 WA PM '
120/208 Trans 6 14 Graybor SQD $3,385.00 $20,310.00
2 300 WA PM
120/208 Trans 3 14 Cummins HQ $4,444.00 $13,332.00 i
s, 5 n 3 750 KVA PM 2 10 Priester MG $8,344.00 $16,688.00 Jtl
w~1 i+ Total $500330.00
k { +i rfM RK:vw ^v.
a' 1PZKO12687007
x ti 1
I
t't ! '
L° -
rf
v t;
a
l +wn wrya;r.+n.Ur+p~^, ....,.+w ydF..'~i-e:o~.`~SeV~.tW'.C~'i1c #+~.tlV9rY,HMU Ao-~ '
*r
1 Y
!
z '
rx'
r
,
22-Jan-a' DID 0 97)4 116. uv. '
f
Itf 1 15.:4VA FM I20/2i'8
NO VENDOR MFG DEL-W FFtCE •9. NLL ILL CAPITAL t LOSSES S TOTAL COST '
I. FRIESTER MI MO fu 03. 711011.00 716 1972 726.74:.72 843.744.71 t40.44? 1
2 FRIESTEF: M: KTE 1: 13.5:~.r~') 335 1686 t:4.G1b.tM) $12.316. E' 137.135
3 CUMMINS HO 14 $7.4S4. 00 354 1864 014.67.7.36 113.434.Qh $37.962 j
4 WESCO WH 18 tS. 60C'.~x+ 345 1621 9:6.752.00 Ill.-mu $:8.671 I
5 TEFCO FT 8 47.676.00 371 2151 925.879.04 $15.229.20 041.t48 f
i 6 VAN IRAN VT l0 t3. 21!'. QO 43(, 19Ul $C:. S99. 40 916.987.48 9?6:586
7-ZW km.,-.--....-B OD... 14 „f3.".85. UG... . 391.. 156A, 421.. G ZQ. 4-~ 412.177.2'x......... 1 v
1 P i"PLE GE 21 S4.445.00 1166 1474 131.24). a(- 111.443.56 142.736
THE LOWEST EVALUATED SID !36.409.
ry.
€r xi lTt 2 RWF'.\'A PM 1201248 j
^ NO VENDOR MFG DEL-W F'RICE to. P&L TLL CAPITAL t LOSSES I 101AL COST
ae t PRIESTER 01 MO t:, I4 749.,X+ 198 1184 931.432.9 9:3.096.5! 956.5:4 '
Ff`1[STER M: RIE 1. 15.16 .00 617 414 1:6.140.49 Ia^1.794..79 156. 1:D
J 3 Qtiftlbl
4 WESCO WH 18 14.917.0) 5Ce 85 1114.696.09 822.365.65 ~i5 911 y.
.1 S 7EPCO FT S $4. 61 t;. Cu) 6->8 4156 93:.497.6') 928.714.17 M 1.{4
6 VAN TRAIN VI J0 95.TN) 3000 976.et3.44 122.865.4t 159.501 ,
7 GRAYSAR SOD 1-4 to. 154X01 1
628 :175 $23..03.8r 1591493
8 TEMPLE GE 21 $S. 7"2.00 517 2677 ${:'.353.21 114.695. 05 154.944 I
y 1
THE LOWEST EVALUATED DID 156. 119
a
ITf 7 750 I.VA 277/484
Np VENDOfa MFG DEL-W PRICE as. NLL TLL CAPITAL IT LOSSEB 9 tOTAL COST.
,Y t o.AIL, 01 o,.~........~J... 4Fj3HAaP .i44R ~L6.1IZ e2.4.4,_711..1i6:24 . 9 o9z
1 FFSEETE N~~~~ATE 16 f~.674.OC~~1063 ~ 6068 165.942.96 $48.082. 33
911 .07
3 CUMMINS ion l4 /9.576. C*) 863 7616 06:.575.04 149.859.70 illl.2t5
4 WtSCO WH 1E $14.4112. CK) 1119 6255 973.582.08 t44.647. b9 4118.:''!+)
,te 1 5.TEF'G.1 FT 8 99.127. QC! 990 6971. )64.254.0'8 1146.882.79 $111.137
6 VAN TRAN VT 10 09.2311.0 1160 6620 $65.014.47 847.043.99 )112.1-49
• 7 GAA'YDAR SOD 14 99.880. C.) 1126 560'9 $64.111111.:0 191.141.51 fS1h. 697
t
1 of 9 TEMPLE GE 21 $9.L3b. C✓) 1176 6290 167.133.44 145.354.91 1112.498
F I
THE LOWEST EVALUATE) bID 9103.097
.K
r
1 i
f
.
.
Ir •
T ' ' 'Y ,Mo-.-~ y._ .....a.r.r~ye tdRtYN. FIThI.....,., - KI WV'.'•I i'.
Y9#
St' 1 i'~2thwrgt,+,ws• '..Rb slsrJU44ia rd.~rQLa,y,~INST~.'r~33'vti"4'10
F
DATE: February 3, 1987
i
,
I CITY COUNCIL REPORT
70: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
j ~
SUBJECT: BID/ 9706 PAOMOOUNT SWITCHGEAR i
RECO191hOATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specification of Cummins Supply in the amount of $6,839.00 each,
FOB Denton. Total bid award is $68,390.00.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of 10 sets of padmounted
sw c gear. This material will be used in the maintenance and new con- .
struction of the electrical distribution system.
The bid of Priester Supply is lower however they have of-
fered an oil filled switch that does not meet our specifications.
The bid of Temple, Inc. is FOB Shipping Point not Denton
t - as required.
r
AACURO Tabulation Sheet
PR0 ams DEPARTI MTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution
p~ ta
1 _F1SCAy_ 1FACT: 1986187 Budget Funds Acct N 611-008-0252-9221 i =
~r
f
R_Ipectful submitted: I
Q
Lloyd Y Harrell
• City Manager
f , A Papa red by:
. i
Name. tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
.w
1
4J
P a, K Approved:
,~iamePurchasMngsAgent C.P,M.
~1 tla,
~A .40 WO 4 "~•'Mtw N-'e-w=
3i
I i 1 I I i 1 I I I
1111 9716 f PAIESIER I NESCO I CUMMINS I TEMPLE I SRAW I ELL 1011 I NELSON 1 1. F.
I 1
- Ill TIME PADNWINT 341FE46EAR I SUFFLY I ` SUPPLY 1 INC. I ELECTRIC 11NDUSFRIE9 I ELECTRIC I SEARS I I
OPENED 112117 2181 P.M. I 1 I I t 1 I I I
ACCUIRITI , 611-ItB-1252-9221 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I r ! f
I .L - I -I
I
i t Oil . 1 I70 DESUIP11ON t VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDCR I 'VENDOR I VENDOR ! VENDOR
1
1 :...°-_...................i.._°°••....I.............r...._....__.-I___••-•-°.....•.•..----_.I.........•...I•••--_....._.1
1 I I I I 1 I I f r
I.` 1 11 IPAONOUNT SMITCHBE A 1 5,999.11 I 71168.11 1 8,139.91 1 61771.11. ?,07.21 1 9.566.11 1 11771.11 1 29t225.11 i I
1 1 I I I { 1 I t r t
I E I I I I I I I t 1
i t NANFACTURER I ATE 1 5 1 E I F9 1 9 1 C 1 5 t C I ELLIOTT I KEARNEY I AMERICAN I I
I I 1 7211.11 1 PME 1 t PME I FME I EMPR I YE-9 1911ITCN5EAR I I
I I 1 1 i I 1 I I I
i I DELIVERY 1 77 DAYS 1 12 WK 1 11 DAYS 1 12 NR 1 12 WK 1 11-12 NK 1 41-14 DAYS I I I
,1 I I I J I 'I I I r I 1
1 I I I I 1 I t i 1
I '1 I I 1 1 I I I 1
`.I 1 i I 1 t I t t I I t
1 1 f I I I I I 1 I I f
1
1
w
.....u~ .y.. n....r..^.w►agYl.+.iW~N~IM~11w.IL1ow1~1yRM'.rw+w.rwfw.Mm.rY+r-w...•-._..._ VwW WM~y~~K'~MMN/Y1YY.i1
i .e
yy~
Ham
L-L
i
q t
f ~
i
^
1 '
1 a
°l
b"
is
r r ;
y_
it
=r
~ dl
tj ~ ~ •kJ i
i
. h1 1 'i
k`
s 0923E
4
NO.
i
j AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
f EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
j SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW
EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS;
i k AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that ceitain
contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an
x amount exceeding $10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the `
case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at i
once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the j
citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is
necessary to protect the public health of the citizens of the j
city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property,
machinery or equipment; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby determines that there is a
public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to
appropriate money ro relieve the necessity of the citizens or
to preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public
health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen
~k1 damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason
thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials,
equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase
x Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
x 77049 rrwaQai fiFr.YSJc cn. $1Z UP An
Wit 7,
lib 6ECTION II.
That because of such emergency, the City Manager or
.,3 designated employee is hereby authorized to purchase the
materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the
r + i
i a, y i 5
i
i
i
" iyE
attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the
t' amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in
accordance witt, the provisions of state law exempting such
i purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ 3 day of FEBRUARY 1987.
A E t , MAYOR .a
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
r
a
ar' ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITE' OF DENTONt TEXAS
APPROVED' AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DE$RA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.,
I
4
fe
3
• PAGE TWO
.m,
+lAtudAk-ji*sk%y~R~:Rai7/IW.•gaup
Pw r"
r
v1
y
d
DATE: February 3, 1987
1 1
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
}
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Councio
f
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Purchase Order 77099 General Electric
RECOMPFJiDAT1O11: We recommend purchase order number 77099 to General Electric in
the amount of $17072.00 be approved for payment.
SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the repair and return of Turbine Rotor for Unit N3,'
the order includes transportation, insurance machine shop work and becring replacemen .I
6 ~
}
~ BACK6ROU111): Purchase order 77099; 'Request 123280
r,
PROGRMIS, DFPARTFENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Production
10 FISCAL 1141ACT: E
' 1986/87 Budget Funds for Plant Maintenance Account Humber 610-080-0251-8339-E539
Respectful submitted:
Lloyd V Narrall
City Manager
Prepared by:
Nacre t Tom D. Shaw
Y d r T1t1a: Asst, Purchasing Agent
ApOrOid:
tea; ~yf6hn J. Marshall
,Pk , •~,1....-tf,....{...~,....e..~a.... ..:;..:-ce .r'nf'4'F~°». . n. va, do
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
901.5 TEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76101
i
PUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT Ty
0t/17/87 f05
' 4 GENT2000
' SHIP TO:
VENDOR ELECTRIC PRODUCTtON
I GTHERAL ELECTRIC COMPRNY ELECTRIC RN ONLY CONFI
3202 MANOR WAY DO 1tOT DUPLICATE
OkLLASs TX AiTMV R 73235-5996
~ TTN= BRUCE GT58s
BID/REF.0
DID NO. ~ AMOUN
kTEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER- DESCRIPTION
660i0t
8339 R539 L :SNIPPIENT TURBINE: ROTOR 6RETURN S30,0f
/,gLAg~•CLEAN ND5 ROTOR/CRACKS 305304(
O1 61.0'•:080''0251 3r
+ 0 410:0600251'8334 E539 L GRIND 01 ;JOURNAL LATHE WORK f~600:Ot
03 3 6102060 :0251:6334 E334
04 '61 J ' 0 801:02 51 :8339 E334 2 REP1.1',R M1 BEARING LINER 20598600
08 610:050:0251 '8394 E5:{4 1 RECEIVING-PREPARING ROTOR
r
Y ~
4 ti x fi'
r5yry
I
R, 'G
at/
K 1
,
CO TA Pf]P ejaJ LTA" ZZLOS
The Cit of Denton Texas is tax eKem t • House Bill No. 20.
' J. Refafake P.O, N,umbef on nil B/l,Shipmonls and Invoices
a Sltlyments are F.d.B. City of Denton, of is Indicated. By
i a
•1y a 1 Difect tnqukrlea TA:
' send Invoices T0: John J. Marshall, CPurchaeinb wgant
f' City of Dentoa, Accounts Payable Tom 0. Show, C.P.M. Asst. Purchaeipq Agent
r 116 9. McKlan#y St , Denton, TX 75201 517/566.0311 01FW Metro 287.0042 ,
,Ik r' (Of es IndlcllaU On PUl:ilale Ofd/f► a
The City of Denton Is an equal aPPortun11Y emPIOW x
1
.
PURCHASE REQUISITION -ao
1P 1 d 1
y
Na 123 80 PO NUMBER i I O PODATE ~ ~ ~ ACCOUNTING m .Y BuDGBT
PERIOD
,
ACTION TYPE OF ORDER COMMENTS
CI walml Entry (E) El P8ctuncha" Order (1)
o AMl A nmt UO o Auto PO M+aeaae ls1 _
N0. r 140. 00.
VtNDAR DELtVER jPty of Denton Steam Plant p Bid C3 Rush
General Electric Company
n1rM inOY ay name HULA pencer oa
02 adds"' C1 Quofofisnt p ~Id/Quo/e Purer.
r ?exsS ?005
nddrea■ _
0E/
WAGO
a•-g;1+r a • Save 1- t' - ~nortene GeniiMeflon
ORGAN I• REP. QUANTITY NUMBER D E S t R I P T I 0 N / C O M M E N T S BID NO. PRICE AUK IJNT D'
L !"IRjD AOlNCY CATION ACTIVM OBJECT CATEG. UNITS anv
00
660-
1 S i ment of turbine rotor to Dallas and return - 8
AW 8539 4
truck and $1,000,000 lneurance coverage on rotor
can nd D E rotor for cracks 3 530 00
iii I
690 0251 95 psh surface, lath wo►k -
~o Grind 11 JOUTDAIAQ_ Ala including manufacture of steady bearing for
3,881 00
rVujolt"s wild- Al-) 833 9539 2 specified for new iournal daameterto clearance
11 be i ner
4160 00
2,89 00
O 080 0251 833 953 1 Race ivin - re grin rotor for repairs
-IL
TOTAL
Jerry Crisp Pureh.+sne Aoora~as; - to
_ D.
I !artily that "co eMobeW havo f nde avdLS r e 1 ure a. Mr++1•~+n1 APPrevat; -
Council Awov+l; Data
Dlv.~tJ+ot• APMevbl ~ / /
X
1.
Screened moos for Pu►dlosing us* Only
o _ r ~1 ` o a
a a 4 z
o ~ N Ya
N N C > W
j N tr M
b co
A A O
g „oo
~M W 30 A a* W
b $
y
1
M W
- a
1A tv
M m + 4 O
ems r`n
j < M n fi
IL
d pxp
~ 1 \ p A e P+ H n n
09 jf a.. 04 m 60 Q~
I M N M In ~ P
1~ •g A
j^ * ° a r
' A • 0 9 d
I g b n Ib ti b
on ►°e oo =
n M O O
n a~
o a~ o n m
n -4
it m
Q M rpi K N
r
c~
0 0
~ N s• u1 w * ~
4
g 8 g 8
lid -1
eened areas for Purchoslnq"use only
~r...r..:..x vTN d<.d.-„w ii ••a..+:..'. d. .a,:o,mr...•x Aa..
r
1 ~
owl CITY OF DENTON
UTI1T11S MEMORANDUM
TO: John Marshal•1, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Jerry Crisp, Acting Maintenance Supervisor
DATE: January 161 1987
SUBJECT: Turbine Repair
We are requgating an emergency P.O. to cover repair costs
to the Unit 03 turbine rotor. The overhaul is already
three months Late due to the asbestos removal program.
The parts and immediate repair work is necessary so that
we can get the rotor back from the service shop and
' continue with the overhaul.
' Jeryy Crimp; Acting Kaintanin or
rr
Electric Production Division
JC/bj
vy .r•.
Vjj
.1
4
%
J
i
A
1
f
]III
1
r
E`
. 9 1
I
1
I
1
[lilt
j
t
]lilt
. ar I
'I Y
' t 1° 1
k it
14
Y. t
~i 1 n
LY of Y ,
T r.
i
4 1 I,
>s r, ,a,' t
r
~~~9P R r"° f. ~rt
I ~r7~ Z%r f '
4 r o °4'
it 1,
r
DATE: 02/03/87
UTY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
;I
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council j
{ FROMt Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
BUBJECTi CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR {
PUBLIC NEARINOS CONCERNING THE REQUEST OF TEASLEY ROAD ASSOCIATES
FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 80,82 ACRES BEING PART OF THE JAMES y
COLTART SURVEY, ABSTRACT 288, AND LOCATED NORTHWEST OF LOOP 288,
NORTH OF KINGS ROW, AND WEST OF PARRIS ROAD (A-42)
+
I
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission will make its recommendation at a k
later date. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the
technical aspects of the proposed annexation and potential
development and has no objections.
•
fll~BYt
The petitioners of this voluntary annexation proposal informed the
' City Council, Planning and Zoning Commissions and staff of their
intention to request annexation and coning of additional property
when public hearings and roview of zoning for an adjoining 115 acres
was being processod (A-33). There are no existing land user or
dwelling unite located on the subject property and the existing
population to zero. The stated purpose of the annexation request is
to provide for a forthcoming mingle family (8P-7) zoning petition.
BACKGROUND:
" The adjoining and previously annexed property (A-33) has been zoned
planned development (PD) with a predominant land use of mingle
family detached (8 acres of retail at intersection of Loop and Kings
Row), An elementary School on Parris Road is under construction and
scheduled for fell 1987 opening.
PROGRAMS M OR GROUPS APPECTEDt
City of Denton, property owners.
z
FISCAL IRPACTs
;
a,, Undertar~inad ~
.
M.. . , , . .
_.~}I~et?twP7g,1uA,... a.w. n... w8dc:4R?irF +'+a..w?.ti+i1Y:ra'.
February 3, 1989
Page ,2
i
Rasp2A.,. ly submit e s
A oyd weFr•„ared bys CSty or
p1
DavLd tllison f
senior Planner
APP ved
r
Jett Ke i
? 0l.reotor'o P3 ni
and DeVelopment
r
~y 1 rl. ;
a.
r ,ar
u
A e'
L
1
~y rl i ~ 20s9g 1 , r
J ,
f
L
`.i. _y~pypPq.l,k,/~ipNrvww«.... au4,V6stansMbn.w .s.. _ w++n.d.e~Wb s~WR*iN+'WM1~a~4:i~M': .e;!rrwww -
1b8SL
j N0.
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH
PUBLIC HEARINGS. i
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: 4
I
I
i
SECTION 1.
On the day of 19870 at 7:00 o'clock F. M.
~oin the City uncil Cham ers o the Municipal Building of the
City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public
hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be
heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of
the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
6 } `
incorporated by reference herein.
r
On the day of , 19879 at 7:00 o'clock P.M.
in the City ~o'uncll Chambers of tt Municipal Building of the
City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public
hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be
heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of
the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein.
` SECTION 11.
j
The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized
4.` and directed to cause notice of such public hearings to be
published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the
City and in the territory described in Exhibit "A" not more than
twenty days nor less than ten days prior to the date of such
public hearings, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation
k Act (Article 970e Vernonts Texas Civil Statutes).
t5
SECTION III0
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect Immediately
f• following its passage and approval.
1
M
a• y
' i
y A•42/T1SLEY ROAD ASSOCIATES/PAGE ONE
i IP.u}4i\M'!W y.,+q..pv n ,;.q .MeI11FwYlnm n.. ~ I
v •.kn..e,,Vl>!v»p~fYFlkl'w j1CW YU'4~~~'M~"M6e`
I
1
i
r
4
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987,
1 1
r4
WW b
Plk J "Pr ~ -
y'
} }
:41
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS j
.1;.
~«wr MY
r '
r: h
« ATTEST:
s
y , l
a
1
JENNIFER WALTERS
Y
ACTING CITY SECRETARY ?r
y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
xw D98RA AbAMI DRAYOYITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
~Y Sr e ~ 14,E
BY:
14, 4L
1
n' Y _
i.
t
jt
r 5i~er
. d 3,5,
k . I
JY vl tli
s i
q 4, i
A-42/TEASLEY ROAD ASSOCIATES/FAGS TWO
a
:t
e i
1 E
I .
a
'~/'~~~y;'~Akk'iNFedFe'Yw.Yk`ICY<w~-••. . WMiv41$MJ1WtQ-0k151k'Hk.M1'hrNY v••.•. 'F ~'IW W9'~i®MM'R.Wei'rMFV'.
1
Ire V
f frd r., .
Any , rr, t , y + 1.
i
FIELD NOTES TO A- 4t
G October 28, 1986
i
FULD NOTES TO A-}t
All that certain treat or par0e1 of load lying ant boing situated in the
County of Denton, State of Texu, and being part ••f the Jame Coltart Survey,
Abstreat 268 and sore fully described as tolloty.
BBOINNINO at a point in the present city limits, said point lying at the i
intersection of the Northeast boundary lira of the treat dosoribod in
Ordiaaaae No. 82-6 with the Southerly Northwest earner at the tract described
in Ordinance me. 66-860 said point also lying 600.0 toot Northeast of and
perpendicular to the center lino of State Highway Loop 2881
TNBNCB North 30" 16, 19" West, (By Ordinance North 47. 20, 16" Nest) along the
present city liaits u established by Ordisaaee No. 82-61 600.0 toot Northeast
of ad parallel to the center line of said Loop 288, passing at 312.39 toot,
sore or less, the 9"torly West boundary line of a tract at land conveysd troy
J. D. Drown, at al., to Teasley Rod Associated rive tract by deed dated C
June 2, 1966 and recorded in Volume 1896, Page 404 of the 041.D.0.T., ears
being the Bast boundary live of a treat of lad conveyed trop J. D. Drown, of
wr., to Willis B. barges and wife, Diane K. Norgas by deed dated July 19,
1963 sad recorded in volume 12370 Page 328 of the D.R.D.C.T., passing at
1,377.6 toetp sore or less, the North boundary line at said Borges tract, same
being the Northerly South boundary line of said Te"Iey Road Associated tiro I
k treat, ad continuing a total distance of 10901.50 feet to the beginning of a
curve to the left with a radius of 6,329.38 toot, a central angle of 90 130
f 10", a chord bearing and distance of North S40 540 53" West, 11017.39 tent;
li TNBNCI Northwesterly, along said curve to the left and said present city
)1sits, 600.0 feet Northeast of the center line of Loop 2681 an aro dietana
of 10016.49 tat to a point for corner, said point lying 600.0 toot northeast
of and perpendicular to usid center lino of proposed Loop 268, said point also
lying in the North boundary line of said Teasley Road Associated rive tract{
THOU North 89' 181 42" fast along the North boundary line of maid Teasley
Road Associated rive treat, a dietsaao of 3,101.88 feet to a point for corner,
said point being the Northeast corner of said Teasley Road Associated rive
treat;
THUM South 010 320 12" last along the Best boundary line of said Teasley
ROsd Associated live traot, a distance of 684.39 toot to an angle point for I
corner, said point being a Northeast comer of the present city limits u
established by Ordinance No. 66.881 i
THBNCI South 000 151 49" tact, (By Ordinance South 040 17' 28" last), along
Y said present city limits muse being the Bast boundary lino of said Teasley
Road Associated five tract, a distance of 1,138.62 foot to a paint for corner,
said point being the Southeast corner of said Teasley Road Associated rive
A-42/EXHIBIT A
i
Pleld Notes A-14
October 28, 1986
Page 2
tract, sass being an inner all corner of the present city limits as
established by ordinance No. S6-881 said point also lying in the South
boundary line of said dares Coltart Survey, and the North boundary line of the
r Daniel D. Culp Survey, Abstract 287;
"MCI 496 03' 43" Hest, (by Ordinance South 89'07, OS" Vest), along said ~
pre44nt city Brits sass being the South Loundaty line of fait Yeaaley Road
Msooiated live tract, and said survey lieu, a distance of 829.71 feat to the
place of beginning sad containing 80.82 acrsi of land.
I
is
~r f • rl ~
t
w a.
u a,,
n
i
r
j.CM p
k 14ltg
} 1y A.42/EXHfHIT A r.
a _
n 4
k
QSJ y a P l J
1b85L
i 1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
I
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT:
The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the
territoryy described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incor-
porated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City
of Denton,
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of
1911, at 7100 o'clock P. M. in the C try Z`ouncil Chambers of t1ie
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said tare and
place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
r heard, Of all said matters and things, all persons interested
in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice,
9 ;'t A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council
of the City of Centon, Texas, on the day of
1987s at 7:00 o'clock P. M, in the C tr-yZ~ouncil Cam era o e
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above, proposed annexation, At said time and
r! glace all such persons shall have the right to appear and be i
heard, Of all said matters and things, all ers I.
in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take'noticeested
5
y i
,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST t
'
w
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
'I
r.
A-42/TEASLEY ROAD ASSOCIATES
A i
,v ,u.wr,.v:11 aV.G1,W ',f'b,OYMI+~J.v .
r ,
t r
i
r~
i
FIILD NOTIS TO A- yj,
October 28, 1986
iI
FIBLD VMS TO A-4 L
All that Certain treat or parcel of land lying and being situated in the
County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the Jars Coltart Ssrvey,
Abstract 286 PAd more fully described u tollowds
INOINNlvo at a point in the present city limits, sold point 13164 at the
interssetton of the Northeast boundary line at the tract described in
Ordinaneo No. 42-6 with the Southerly Northwest Cerasr at the treat described
in Ordieanaa No, 66-48, said point also lying 600.0 toot Northeast of and
1 perpendicular to the center line of State Niglway Loop 2661
?MCI North 504 U' 19" West, (4 Ordieenea North 474 20' 16" West) along the
present city limits " established by Ordieaaes No. SI-6, 600.0 toot Northeast
of sad parallel to the enter line of said Loop 2W, passing at 312.39 teat,
wore or loss, the Bastatly West boundary line of a tract of lard *"voted from
J, D. DroMa, at al., to Teasley Road Assaiatsl ft" treat by deal dated
Jule 2, 198f am rooerdod to volume UN, pap 404 of the 0.1.1.a.2.1 same
being the test bwo" line at a treat of leaf oonveysi tram J. 0, Drown, at
ws., to Willte s S. Dosses mad wits, Digs H, lots" by deed dated July 19,
i963 mad reeordsd in volum 1237, Fop US of the D.R.D.O.T., passing at
11377.6 toot, rye or less, the North basn/ary line of sail Dora" treat, same
being the Northerly South bousslaq line of said Teaeloy Road Associated five
tenet, mad Continuing a total distant" of 1,901.50 toot to the bogtw,tng of a
Curve to the loft with a radius of 61329.54 toot, a central angle at 94 13'
1000 a chord bearing and distance at North 544 $4' S3" Went, 1,017.39 teeth
TNIRCI Northwesterly, along said our" to the loft and said present city
ltsits, 600,0 rest Northeast of the enter line of Loop 266, ae an distance
at 1,018.49 test to a point for Corner, said point lying 600.0 test Northeast
of and perpendicular to said Center line of proposed Loop 1IS, said point also
lying is the North boundary lino of said Teasley Road Associated five trots
TNBNCB North 894 18' 42" lost along the North boundary line of said Teasley
Road Associated Five treat, a distance of 30101.84 toot to a point for oorosr,
said point being the Northeast Corner of said Teasley Read Associates five
troat,
TNINCI South 014 32' 12" lost along the teat boundary lino of said Touter
Road Assootatod Five tract, a aistanee of 684.39 toot to an auto point tot
coraot$ said point being a Northwest corner of the present city limits as
estslished by Ordinenee No. 46-Ul
THINCI South 004 1S' 49" Bast, (Sy Ordi we South 004 17' 26" cost), along
said ptesu,t City limits #ana being the But boundary line of said Touter
f
Road Assaoiated five tract, a distance at 1,138.42 test to a point for Corner,
said point being the Southeast cornet of said Toosloy Road Associated five ~
4
f A-42/EXHIBIT A
:v .
Pleld Notes A-4t
Ootobor 28, 1986
Page 2
tract, ease being an inner e11 corner of the present city limits u
! established by Ordtaanoe No. 86-$8, said point also lying in the 84uth
boundary line of sai4 Jens COltart Survey, and the North boundary line of the
Daniel D- Culp Survey, Abstraot 2671
tt TMC1 890 03' 43" Wet, (by Ordinanoe South $90 07' OS" West), along said
present pity liaits saris being the South boundary line of aai t
Msoeidted Pi" treat, and said survey Ithee, a distance of 429.71etestytodthe f
plaee of beginning and oontaining $0.12 sores of land, fff
f
rt ti
t
ry Ir ~r P y,
'J; 7 Cr
1r. - C~ h
c
R ~ .ter .i.
~ Y931g
r S~
1 a
t r
rr~y
A-42/EXEIRIT A
,.M.
_ :~';µtNkmra dipt~ws.... u.... ..,.r. .;-a;*¢
r ° r{r J
1r
j
tai a
C+ L Y • WOrs shun
1 t . Botto m.Circl~ W
Rd. • t
I ! M4RTLEE
~:;'~•"`y r Hartle$ fill d !t''
A
•
A33
• • Kf ass in* .•ad
Tra~r ti care
,,R • •
4 R
see
......;J, 377 360 .,j •
FAP
A ra Ln C ►
tnvolunts
sr Aaa.xatlon
f , , Veiuatarr Ann~x~tloa
k
k
y
k
1
k
4
k
.r
C t
k t.l
3.
R ~
y '
4. ~ r
1 1„ y
F' p f / ~y: w
j
1
l
y
r
k,
t9 r ,
~ y
,S
1 '
,yf 1 D
Y f
rl:
a I~
4. L
i,
.r
~e
t ~
i
t rF I,
rur:
r
t.
lV p
MEMORANDUM
CITY of 01WON / 215 E. McKInney / Denton, Texas 76201
i
TO: Jennifer Naltera, Acting City Secretary
FROM: Nonle Malo-Kull, Supervisor Animal Control
DATEi January 19, 1987
i SUBJECT: City Council Agenda Request
i Attached is a proposed ordinance amending Section 4-32, Article I
of Chapter 4, "Animals" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of 1.
Denton, Texas, This proposed ordinance amendment relates to the
return of adopted dogs and cats and provides for a penalty not to
exceed $200.00 for violations as well as providing an effective data.
" C%
The proposed ordinance is bseicslly identical to the current ordinance.
M It simply eliminates the words "for diagnostic purposes." The City
} of Denton Animal Control can not diagnose any illness,
f her
R t` Sincerel
a 'r
11 J'
Nonle Melo-K 1, Supervisor Animal Control
r.
N91cp
' r ;iF •
8 ~z , , ~ ' , 1~M~ltii+".filk71k1+,MSda ~+e;tt.~. •ww..,.. r..,
, ' .~.'r.yah•KS4+~Y.N41.'n"+~,."wb4.;l-.~ ~R'i "5~.'~8~'USY,Ii &W:'aSTwP ~~rK,i'~£P3"M.T,'`Arid"kUfe(s,Y.areJWrY4a'~WW" t1
M,.
1687L `
I
NO.
l
i
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4-321 ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 41
"ANIMALS" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i RELATING TO THE RETURN OF ADOPTED DOGS AND CATS; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY NOT EEXCEEDVfi $200.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND
PROVIDING AN DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
1 That Section 4-32, Article I of Chapter 4 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to
{ read as followst
Section 4-32. Adoption of Dogs and Cats
+A (S) Any person having possession or responsible for an
adopted dog or cat from the Animal Control Center
shall immediately notify the Center if such animal
escapes, or becomes or appears to be sick, or dies
before the animal has been vaccinated against
rabies and distemper and s ayed, neutered or
as
otherwise permanently sterilized.
SECTION II, `
That any person violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
,Fe Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00); and each day and every day that
the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall constitute a
separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in addition to
and tu&Ulative of, any other remedies as may be available at law
and equity.
i
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) h
days from the date of its passage and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
k published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
1= newspaper of the City of Dentont Texas, within ten (10) days of j
the date of its passage,
i
r
I
4~ f
3 day of 1987.
1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the
RAY 1 f
E , 0
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
t,
r
ATTEST:
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DE TON, TEXAS
APPkOVED'AS TO LEGAL FORM:
} a DEBRA ADAMMI DRAYOVITC}!, CITY ATTORNEY x
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1
~.J, ~llAz~r'~-
t By
l
~I..
14
4.1
14
fPAGE 2
7+
r,
113
r
C .0
I
E
! r
i
I` F
i
rr
i
1
Ik
F r p
b .
M
iNr .bk.~ I
f'ii?L-FI a ~r~. ~1
rx i, 1 .
A 4i
1 I
N, a
~ l
! I C
t
4
w
~ It
r F~1~' - _,-.....,.....-«,.,•~.r.«,....'...nw.a~;yR;r,wflx►.+~ wPW.rfrria'
z
S
,I
19
1
1696E .~i
I
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REPEALING ORDINANCE
NO. 83-04; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
.i
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
WHEREAS, based upon an engineering and traffic investigation
by the staff of the City of Denton, it is determined that there
no longer exists a need for the school zone located on U. S.
Highway 380 at the Bethel Christian Academy; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
ty ~ ~ y
Y SECTION I.
That Ordinance No. 83-04 is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION II.
Sn YI
That this 'ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
AK x its passage and approval.
;'iyllttt PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 19874
,fit :r
t I
RAY STEPHENS$ MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS f
ATTEST:
01
i
I* ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS'TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHj CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: &hv)
5 '
Lyytl . ,aer,:i,,,qv„k'3'.?,4YY#•'NrolalfiY*rwawl~llw~ y
I
i
f
t
3
Sim !I
..J
r
r'. M.
k . `
r `
S
,
yyI 1 ice,.
J~ . fill I~I,r.
I
jyv t~°. Y Y
Y^l ^'F 'R rµ i •'1.
r,,
PA l~` l
41
~'a 4
3 ,
` }t r
~i
F e
Sparrw>: r.ti„ti....... _ ......,...as~/M.'a4ftlWrrA..-.+,.w...._ _~.........~,yx~tr•F,RW~,inib~4^'1F11~f1~~0`Xtl4N4V'r~' i
I
0
' CITY of D*NTON / 215 E. McKinney I Denton, Texas 76201
J MEhORANDUM
~R. DATE: November 24, 1986
TO: CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION
i
i FROM: Paul Iwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer Associate
SUBJECT: No parking both sides of Ave D from Eagle Drive to 135:
This section of Avenue D has experienced enormous traffic growth
since school began this Fall. At certain peak times, traffic
becks 'up to Eagle Drive (see sketch "existing condition"
attached).
Staff has conducted a detailed trrfEic flow pattern analysis of .
this area and one of the major causes of this problem is the I
parking'on Avenue D, particularly on the west side of the 900
{ block. Avenue D is supposed to be a 4-lane roadway but the
pasking on the, right lane of the southbound direction creates a
bottleneck Wit,`. the resultant effect of motorists being forced
to use only one lahe,
Staff inVestigation has shewn that it is only the employees of
' 'Pender Music Company that park on this section of Avenue D. All
the businesses in this area, including Fender, have on-site
~a' ry parking. Removing parking on Avenue D will not create any
inconvenience for area residents as can be demonstrated by the
attached " petition (only Fender is not in favor of this
ordinance). Our recommendations for additlonal 'traffic flow
Improvement on Avenue D have been passed on to the State Highway
bepartmeht, They have, approved these recommendations and they
will be implemented together with no parking on Avenue D.
Staff is requesting a "No Parking" ordinance for this section of
Avenue D.
0419E
i
• •ICel.~h476iA4$L+°!wM}'iA.1UNtvMrun•-wa.«,~
y
Z
1704L
NO.
I
{ AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON BOTH SIDES
OF AVENUE D FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH EAGLE DRIVE TO ITS i
INTERSECTION WITH INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 3SE; PROVIDING A SEVER-
ABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED
DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
y SECTION I. i
When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person
' shall park a vehicle at any time upon the following street in
the City of Denton to-wit:
Both sides of Avenue D from its intersection with Eagle {
Drive to its intersection with Interstate Highway 35E.
SECTION II.
The provisions of Section I prohibiting the parking of
vehicies shall apply at all times to the street and part of
streets designated therein except when it is necessary to stop a
=a vehicle to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance
with the direction of a police officer or official traffic
control device.
G
SECTION III.
wl~ Any person adjudged guilty of parking a vehicle in violation
of this ordinance shall -be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished ;
} by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars (1:200.00).
j SECTION IV.
S~ That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause,
r r phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
erson or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent
a' Miidiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
f
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of
the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enact
such remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
1
SECTION ON V_
That this ordinance shall assaeeomand Ethel Cityf Secretary Is
days from the date of its p 8
ance fficial
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinhe 0
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, da s of
t newspr o ofitsepaslsage of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) Y
the date 1987.
i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
RAY STEPHEN , YOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
l
I 1 I
ATTEST:
' ACTING CITY SECRETARY s
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM!
DEBRA ADIIMF DRAYOVITCHo CITY ATTORNEY y
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
a sy
f '1
*4
,
Vi ~ t
MINUTES
Citizens Traffic Safety Support COml4ission
December 1, 1986
4
i John
PRESENTS Gilbert Be ik,in 6aaorso Virgi is anGsllian,,~ Bruce `
Tompkins,
Chamberlain, Bayne Autrey
' ABSENT: Doris Chipman and Gene Gohlks
STAFF: Jerry Clark, City xnglaesr
Paul Iwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer Associate
Joe Thompson, Traffic Foreman
i
IT #1 APPROVAL, Or-NOVEMBER a" 1986 M NUTEBS
The mesting was called to order by Gilbert Bernstein
at 6130 pm. on Monday, December 1, 1966. Virginia
Gallian made a motion to approve the minutes of
November 3. Notion passe8 uaa iJohn ons mously.to1approventhe
• the notion.
minutes as written.
i The meeting date for January was discussed by the
commission and staff. January 12, 1967 was set as the
j nail. scheduled meeting of traffic safety.
jQ 1&&KIMQ BOTH SIDES OF AVE D FROM EAfIt•E DRIVE TO 136
ITEK 02
Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request to the
commission. He said since the 4-way stop sign was
installed on this section of 135 ■nd Ave D, a heavy
back up of traffic on Ave D has been experienced. At
peak Incurs packing has sometimes extended up to Sagle
111i" IF, Drive. to efforts to solve this problem, a couple
solutions wage ar-lved at.
t ° 1. Eliminate parking on Ave D between 136 and Eagle
Drive. Avenue D is supposed to be a 4-lane
roadway but the parking on the sight Lane of the
southbound direction creates a bottleneck with
the resultant effect of motorists being forced to
uce only one lens. All the property ownece on
this station of Ave D, except Pander music
company support the no parking ordinance. The
State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation and North Texas State University
also support the recommendation.
r 2, The State Department wants the city to first try
k, ' a left turn onto Ave D to smooth out the traffic
j
, flow. it that does not work a second left turn
can be added.
1
i
page 2 Of to pages
i
Paul said the only opposition to the no parking
ordinance was from Penders sMusic treet tormparking.
employees have been using the s
}
Mike Amadore asked if the lanes were divided. Paul
said rwouthe ordince Is ld buton the lanes. the Traffic
j
Department
Richard Gore. manager of Fender's Music store came k
forward to speak in opposition of the no parking
ordinance. He said, he was personally opposed to !
the request. On the southeast side of the campus.
There is no
there has been a parking
cept in tithe street. When
general public parking ex
there is a function at the colosseum, people park on
the street as well as their parking lot. It happens
at certain times of the year, usually during
graduation when other schools use the colosseum and
during basketball season. These functions create a
parking problem for all businesses in the surrounding
area. He said thlotoe8theirecustomers stars ea VEi
to provide more parking
They had can
courtesy to them is this for several
.
f years without any problems until the 4-way stop signs
were installed at Eagle and Ave D access road.
Paul Iwuchukwu said he had been at the location on ;
several occasions (7-8 times) Fenders havn about 16 ¢
$ spaces that are heavily unntilized. The last time he
+ and David Ayers observed the location, only 5 of
Fenders parking spaces were being used. Still
Panders employees pack in the attest. There is no
need from them to be parking in tho• street.
Bruce Chamberlain asked if. only 4 parking spaces was
being used on Ave D by Panaerc. Paul said that was
so most of the time.
F spaces Gore objected, It sat?. there was mte
more like 8 space9en He ' R
Mt. spaces involved.
said thing packing lot was full 601 of the Say and
many students have complained of having no where to
park.
Virginia Gallian asked it it would help it there gal
r no parking for a specified time. Paul said no.
!Bike Amadore said he free the tt fficnflow
the no parking ordinance
at that location.
STAFF RECOMMENDATtoN: No parking on Ave D between Eagle Drive
and I35
COt4MiS8tONER6: VeoanmenEdwards dation.made
JohnmTompkins asecondedt the
`
notx tio on. Motion passed unanimously.
o
_ _ . ~ ~vit~a+aJW
_ _ TA~
1 :
f.
A
a
rp
z
,z
t AIt-vt slcp LI3n*.
` _E:_Ki~TING CoNDITlorl I
t,
f1
J
~ `KKIi. NO rf /lt Wt.~
4
~y': O
y
THIS L.ANC LM-4pirlUTIL-1960 C!3 ll~
,
dooor~cir~unr 1=
c`c~ooo~oo ooo
AVE c-
AVE 'D'
} 0 {
150-1-2 N two
no
n %4t t.R
U A'm v
000 a
1"Atm i~rr, THk1 Q r
u ~
y JG le as Z
1'.y12 I S?!
' 4 I
` ISTAe-KING SITUATION 6GTWL0.N
+'«~..,1~tu n~,~I. i~ ~ +.`1~ I'2:0O PMO 1'1180 rhl
►.;taw' 12:00 d,A 12t¢Of~M ~ ~ .
L
5
Y
.f.._,r..._. .........--._......»,~m,••.-r~-...•...ro..m,~., _ .,..Y. -.....m..a......-.....:.. hnMW~„yMp w~:w„nw.,wn..w'.r.~....~~,~.YhYM~MIq„•.,..'
,
Lh r
t .
,I
I
ill! 1+
ill ill Jill il ill''
a
MMM
fill,
I
I
I
MM:
~~Q 1
t~ + I~
Px , } 1 t t
Y 1
7 `d fA
- r r r
t
o '
M
1
y t1-
A
7
1 r
S~
t
~r
r
X :1 r1
+.A.+.. i....- - _.•r--~-»-..s«►A aeKwilflt*MoM~•••~_, •.w.rr,wa~awr.a+~wa Mwa ,
r p AA ✓i
tti
k
fi~ ~A A
G
DATE: February 31 1987
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
(
i
_i TO, MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
" SUBJECT: CONSIDER ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH THE TEXAS j
{ WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR A
f WATER/WASTEWATER STUDY OF DENTON COUNTY j
I f~ ;
RECOMMENDATION:
w: The Public Utilities Board at their meeting of January
14, recommended approval of the contract. '
f SUMMARY:
D'k ' This Contract provides for 50% (up to $125,000) of the
funding for the water/wastewater study for Denton
k^. County. The contract establishes certain requirements
and expectations of Denton by the Texas Water Develop-
ment Board (TWDB) in return for this funding, These
requirements will be met by a contract that the County
is entering into with Espey, Huston i Associates,
Inc, The City of Denton and Denton County will in
turn enter into a contract wherein Denton will assign
. these TWDB requirements and funds to Denton County. ,
BACXGROUND:
A Committee consisting of representatives from 14
cities, towns, and water suppliers has been formed to
study the long-term supply, treatment, and trans-
mission of water and the collection and treatment of
" wastewater for Denton County. This Committee has
recvmmended and the County is expected to contract
with Espay, Huston 6 Associates, Inc., to conduct the
study. The City of Denton, on behalf of the Committee
and Denton County applied for and received this grant
from the TWDB to help pay for the study. Denton
„ County, according to State Law, was not able to apply '
5 for the grant because it is not a supplier of water.
I
r.
t~
f ~.Si1 •l"Y..N h. ,fryj ai.d/ r•V f a.-A'..t.M a. f
wr~w '
s$M is _ _ ~ _ _ _
e,
b
Yi
IS
ii
rv '
L
r. Page 2
E
4. The electric rate reduction includes slightly lower
demand charges and base energy rates. The energy
. cost adjustment (ECA) will be reduced from 2,150/ 1
KWH to 2.000/KWH.
t
Small commercial customers will receive rate
relief with elimination of the demand charge for
the first 5 KW of demand.
nL i
R y.
A time of use rate will be available for General
Service customers and Religious Worship customers i
wherein the rate for peak hours would be 10,250/
KWH plus Energy Cost Adjustment (ECA) and off peak
hours rate would be 4,50/KWH plus ECA. Off peak
hours are generally any time before 12 noon and 3
after 8 p.m. weekdays and all hours on weekends i
and holidays. There would be no demand charge j
with this rate.
The Executive Summary plus selected exhibits of pro
posed new water rates, water bill comparisons,
proposed new electric rates and selected electric#
water, and wastewater financial pro forma's are
fi included with this Council agenda item. A complete
~r. set of rate study work papers are available in the
I Utility Administration office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
W4 To accomplish this rate reduction the electric depart-
ment will have to reduce budgeted expenditure by
Approximately 500 000 will be from fuel
{ and purchase chase power related expenditures. $7000000
fi. will have to be from cuts in operations and
maintenance.
Five percent (51) of the water rate increase is i ;
required to meet 1987 budget expenditures. Four and
one-half percent (4.54) of the increase is to aid in
building a reserve to pay the annual $11800,000 debt
service on Ray Roberts that will be payable in March
of 1988. Another 12 to 151 increase in late 198' or
early 1988 will also be required.
~r
ti.
j
JA.'
8 ~ !
/J F µ.~~yppai.....nw+^.e•r.,...._. l:.i_j,.+.i1d*" . k4..Y.ILK * knt.~Vir. +rti~a4Wi
4'~.. ' e5W.4'.NPAiirK1N~-4a'W►k',
r'
A In AA.
f
I
y
~f
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton, Denton County, other Denton County j
Cities and Water Suppliers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The $125,000 TWDB grant is expected to finance 501 of 4
XY: the study which in turn could save Denton y
approximately $51000. #
A
1~
Respe ully,sub 1.J:
g i
4c° Lloy Harre
Prepared b s City Manager
Nelson ~ ~
Director of Utilities
Approved: n
k _
R.E. Nelson
' Director Utilities
Attachment Ordinance and contract with Texas Water
Development Board
2: Participating Agencies and Entties Huston
3: Contract between Denton County and Esppy,
6 Associates
s 4: Minutes PUB, January 14, 1987
~M
5 '
ts~ I
I
tiF y
ar f ~
° pp.w+•,++'r.,.,.... ,..-'t+'14'S+Itr rigU'yil{.V'r f,t~y^yypr!ax'M~
I ki
i
1678L
i
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON,
ET AL AND THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD; APPROVING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
r i DATE.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
I
E SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby approves and authorizes the
Mayor and City Secretary to execute and attest, respectively,
~r. theagreement between the
City of Denton, at al and The Texas
Water Development Board, relating to a regional water supply and
wastewater services planning study under the terms and conditions
being contained in said agreement which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
SECTION II.
That the
City Council authorizes
the expenditure of funds in
the`manner and amount as specified in the Agreement.
SECTION III.
II
I Tlat this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon ,
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 19876
~
f
Hx
KAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I
ATTEST
MAROTTE ALLEN CITY SEMMM
CITY OF DENTON,jTEXAS
z
APPPOVED AS TO'LEGAL FORM:
t DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
z CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYr /J,0 JA4LJ7'
z
y ;'~,Yt.w•.. - .av.•, r-~HV.. ua.e......,... ..rr.,:r,:4.vi tM2LA4`~,r.4F,q}ar;.•:T-."+~GL.~!:M1'~Y.'%°'ppp.
Y
. i,[ .
t
' 161AL~ '
t ~x
TWDB Contract NQ.
F THE STATE OF TEXAS I CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TEXAS
WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND
COUNTY OF TRAVIS I THE CITY OF DENTON, ST AL
< This contract is made and entered into between the Texas
Water Development Board, hereinafter termed the 'Board"t and the
City of Denton, Denton County Commissioner's Court, other Denton
4.. County Mumicl alitles, and the City of Dallas, hereinafter termed
l "Denton,f undper which the following terms, conditions, and pro-
visions Eve been agreed upon, In consideration of the mutual
promises and covenants hereinafter stated,
s, y
WITNESSETH3 I
I.
r PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY DENTON
As a joint and a cooperative undertaking with the Board, to i
be financed jointly as hereinafter specified$ the City of Dentda
will conduct a regional water supply and wastewater services
planning study for the City of Denton and the balance of Denton
County, excluding an area south and southwest of Denton Creek.
Services and activities provided shall be in strict
a accordance with requirements of the Texas Water Code, Chapter
" isi associated rules of 31 Texas Administrative Code Chapter
$511 Attachment A, the original grant application, which is sad*
A permanent part of this contracts and with the following
procedures andPproject descriptionss
1. It shall be the responsibility of the' City of Denton to
establish formal' and direct liaison with the entities listed in
'zxhW t A, the directors of utility districts within the service
area that have notified Denton of their interest In the ppro ect,
appropriste officials of the Cities of Dallas and Lew[sv Ile,
t e North Texas Municipal Water District, the Trinity River
Authority, tad community leaders in the proposed service area
for the purpose of coordinating the work of the planning study
k and to acquire available data pertinent to the planning effort.
s Planning shell be coordinated with all existing water supply, I
wastewater treatment, and floodin! studies and activities for
the purpa • of providing information for the proposed project.
As the orgsmising entity, the City of Denton has the responsi-
bility to solicit comments from the general public as to the
content of the planning project,
I, The project will ad a feasibility study for a
regional water supply and wastewater services system for a
t,
t
W
'rv
pi
w` service area located in the E18 Pork watershed of the Trinity j
( River Basin. The feasibility study, which is described in more
detail in Exhibit S, will; ~
e<
A. Develop a conservation plan for the service area I
to emphasi:e more efficient use of water resources, {
5. Determine present and
r3, the years 1918 through 2010 for Allmacities,
unincorporated areas, and water service entities
in the planning area, #
{ C. Determine present entities, systems for water and
wastewater service, and water resources available
in the planning area.
D. Anslyse most feasible water purveyor organisational
structures which miy provide water and/or waste.
F water services within the planning area. Specific
alternatives to be considered will includes
1. Expansion of presently adopted service areas
(with agreement from entities) of Cities of
Denton and/or Lewisville.
2. Creation of new regional entities (i.e., water
districts),
3. Service from existing entities which may or may
not presently provide service within the
r planning area (i.e., Trinity River Authority).
E. Conduct Interviews with established entities to
insure conceptual agreement with proposed roles in
regional service plans,
P. Prepare prfliminary cost estimates and Implemen-
tation s chedules for recommended service
alternatives.
G, Provide recommendations for financial and legal l
strategies for funding initial construction costs
and annual operation and maintenance costs.
Include estimates of potential customer rates
under recommended alternatives.
,d f
N. Identify probable initial capital cost partlci a
! tion and continuin contractual
between suppliers and' customers under erecomm end e-
d
alternatives.
PAGE 2
l A..9T., ;:•.?ia .,,....:csf.. ey r._rfe'4 l:,,}a1
4'N
t
n
t € 3, The study will review the relevant portions of the City
of Dallas' master planning effort that address water supply,
treatment and delivery to the study area.
4. The protect will include coordinating the water supp
and wastewater system plans and policies with existing
policies of entities listed in ftelllt A, the county, F and thely
' state,
Ito {
V, PROJECT SCHEDULE AND REPORTS
tx. The tern of this contract shall begin and the Corporation
shall begin performing its obligations hereunder on February 4
1987. '
The City of Denton shall complete the work program stated
In Article to above, not later than August 31, 19170 unless suet
date is extended as provided below, at which time the City of
Dentoh shall deliver a final draft report. After a thirty-day
review period the draft final report together with review
comments will be returned to the city of Denton. A final report
incorporating any required changes must be submitted to the
Board 'within sixty (60) days thereafter. Deadline$ ay
extended only in writing by the Board, Ten (10) copies mof the
fine; report shell be delivered to the Board. Delivery of the
5 firms report pprior to November 30. 19871 shall constitute
completion of L1:e term of the Contract.
Monthly pro ress work reports which suamarite the work
completed throug~ the period of the submitted State of Texas
Purchase Voucher Will be submitted by the City of Denton to the
' Board by the 20th of the month following the period covered by
the Voucher, The work report will contain the following
information:
1. Task names and descriptions,
16 Total cost of the individual tasks, including TWDS and
1 City'of Denton portions,
3. Peres* of the tasks completed.
r^i 4, Dollar value of the percent of the tasks completed.
S, Total tasks completed, indicating the percent of and
dollar value of the pro)ect completed as reflected in totals of
r all State Vouchers submitted.
A coordination mooring will be held at the and of every
three-month period to discuss the status of the study, Repro*
tentative$ of municipalities in Denton County and the City of
Dallas will be invited to the meetings, E
PAGE S
x
G rr_ A•~A s 5 n.!rrY H.4 t. r r Y A..., dAA, m _
Y1 : I,j
k
f
t,J
I
f- The City of Denton will schedule the coordination meetings
so that a status report on the project can be written by the
••Citrr of Denton and submitted to the Board according to the
Eollowing monthly schedule during the active life of the
contractt March 1, 19170 and June 1 1987. An interim status
t report will not be required after the draft final re art has
been submitted for review. The status reports shall be in
letter fora and shall contain the following Information:
1. A brief statement of the overall progress made since the
v,
last status report.
E~. 2. A brief description of any problems that have been
encountered during the previous reporting period that will
affect the study, delay the timely completion of any portion of
the contract, or will Inhibit the completion of or cause a
change in any of the project products or objectives.
3. A description of actions;'J hi City of Denton or the
contractor plans to take to correct any problems described in
Item 2 above or change any schedule, product, or objectives
stated in the contract.
" If for any reason the City of Denton is unable to complete
' its erformance called for under the terms of this contract on
or bpefore August 31, 1987, and is unable to deliver the final
report on or before November 30, 1987, the City of Denton and
the Hoard hereby agree to consider negotia'tin a new contract
,y period, The Board must, however, be `notified in writing ten
(10) working days prior to the date for completion of the work
program or thirty (30) days prior to the data for submittal of
the final report that the City of Denton will be requesting
t renegotiation.
I1I.
j,
COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT
The Board, for and in consideration of the obligations and
a, responsibilities undertaken by the City of Denton, hereby agrees
to compensai'e and reimburse the City of Denton, in a total
amount not to exceed $12590001 upon the submission of Invoices
tip`{ and purchase vouchers representing costs incurred by the City of
Denton pursuant to performance of this Contract. The City of
` Denton will contribute ;135,000, representin fifty (50) percent
of the total project cost, in the form of cas s
A. Reimbursement to the City of Denton shall be made in
accordance with the following budget, with the Board
contributing fifty (50) percent of the total project cost in
the form of cash.
f PACE /
two
P ,
4,
4L -
I
t:
a
k
n
i BUDGET
~s Regional Water Supply
Contract Study for the City of Denton
A. Salaries and wages $ 51,863
8. Fringe 13,738
C,Travel 2,200
D. Expendable Supplies 10100
E. Contract Services* 68,750
F. Technical/Cosputer Services 20200
` a, Communications 10160
M. Reproduction 9$50
1. Overhead 780138
J. Profit 21,561
TOTAL MOM
;r Subcontracts
VD~
Monthly invoices or vouchers supplied by the Board for work
performed shall be submitted for reimbursement, Said invoices
and vouchers shall be supported by sufficient detail to tub•
stantiate billing by the City of Denton said detail to include
Y. the followings
1For direct expenses incurred by the City of Denton
Y; for outsiot consultin •of invoices to
t the CitY of Denton sowing thtasks that were per.
5,.. formed= the percent and cost of each task completed= I
t, a total cost figure for each direct expense category k
1 including labor, overhead, travel, communication and h,
posts e, technical and computer services, expendable
suppl es, printing and reproduction; and the total
1 dollllar amount due to the consultant,
2, For travel and subsistence expenses, including such
i'r''• expenses for sub•contrictors••rsaees, date, work
locaflon, time period at work location, itemisation
or subsistence expenses of each employee, "limited,
however, to travel expense authorised for state
employees by House Bill 20, as amended, Acts of the
690i Legislature, Regular Session, 1985 (Ceneral
Appropriation Act); and
3, Other transportation costs--copies of invoices
coVerin tickets for tramportation or, if not
availabe names, dates, and points of travel of E
individuals; and
PAGES
a
.x
N'
i'
4. All other reimbursabls exsn enses•-
purchase vouchers shoxing reason invoices or
receipts
fo
for expense
to
evidence the mount incurred pence xith
B. The Board shall reimburse the City of Denton
only Fay only upon
Invoice and purchase voucher= provided hoxsver, up to ninety (901) : the Board shall
City o Denton perE900 ;vercent of each invoice pending the
acceptance and Approval of saldc reportloby theth oardport At
and
j bime of said performance, completion, and approval of the re ort
the
~k. by the Board, the Board shall pay the remaining ton (lol)
pp
percent to the City of Denton, g
IV*
PUBLICATION AND SUBCONTRACTING
" The Board shall have unlimited rights to technical
data resulting d.rectly from the performance of services to otthe
Board under this contract,
It is agreed that the water supply dove.
loped by the City of Denton planning matentract rials shall
become the joint property of theucity nOf Denton this
and the Board in
which the Board retains the right to establish copyrights. An
water su
Pp1Y planning materials subject to a board co right and
produced b th y ppy
y + City of Denton or Board pursuant to thia contract
may be printed by the City of Denton or Board at their oxn cos
' ofd Texriibu The bCitythcE Dentoalrmayscotherwiseithin the State
material provided under this contract as it deems nic@AJ&rseed
' appropriate, 1nclUding the right to
Lt materials or any pares thereof undec~i,ss own dnami t y
within thhe
r State of Texas, provided that any Board copyright is appropre
ately noted on the printed materials,
The City of Denton agrees to acknowledge the Boa
news releases or other
!
Public rd
dons
aed relating to the work per.
No work herein called for by the City of Denton shall be
subcontracted or assigned without rlor written approval of the l
Executive pp
including i Qe~iilee tbudger eiriaateawithf specific subcontract,
' st details
for each item of the work to be performed by the subcontractor
and for each category of reimbursable expenses,
' AMENDMENT, TERMINATION, AND STOP ORDERS i
This contract asa
writ ten eonlent and my bbe termini adr by .thee Board yatb any ut lme
i
1 t
PAGE 6
~ yVVy
~1l
F
i
by written notice to the City of Denton, Upon receipt of such
notice, the City of Denton shall, unless the notice directs
otherwise, Immediately discontinue all work in connection with
the performance of this Contract and shall proceed to cancel
promptly all existing orders insofar as such orders are
q chargeable to this Contract, The City of Denton shall suboit a
statement showin in detail the work performed under this
Contract to the ate of termination, The Board shall then pay
the City of Denton promptly that proportion of the prescribed
fee which applied to the work actually performed under this
Contract, less all payments that have been previously made.
Thereupon, copies of all completed work accomplished under this
Contract shall be delivered to the Board. I
The Board may issue a Stop Work Order to the city of Denton I
at any time. Upon receipt of such order, the City of Denton is
to discontinue all work under this Contract and cancel all
` orders pursuant to the Contrcc.t, unless the order directs
otherwise. If the Board does not Issue a Restart Order within j
60 days after receipt by the City of Denton of the Stop Work
Order, the City of Denton shall regard this Contract terminated
in accordance with the foregoing provisions.
~ ! VI.
# NO DEBT AGAINST THE STATE
This Contract and agreement shall not be construed as
creating any debt by or on behalf of the State of Texas and for
i the Texas Water Development Board, and all obligations of the
State of Texas are subject to the availability of funds.
j
, YII.
LICENSES, PERMITS, AND INSURANCE
For the purpose of this Contract, the City of Denton will be
considered in independent contractor and therefore solely respon-
y sible for liability resulting from negligent acts or omissions.
The City of Denton shall obtain all necessary insurance in the
Y.. judgment of the City of Denton, to protect itself, the Board,
and emloyees and officials of the Board from liability arising
out of the Contract, The City of Denton shall Indemnify and
hold the Board and the State of Texas harmless, to the extend
that the City of Denton may do so in accordance with the State
Law, from any and all losses, damages, liability, or claims
t therefore, on account of pereonal injury, death, or property
}4 damagge of any nature whatsoever caused by the City of Denton,
arising out of the activities under this Contract. C
w I
The City of Denton shall be solely and entirely responsible
for procuring all approptiste licenses and permits which may be
required by any competent authority for the City of Denton to 1
perform the subject work.
1
PAGE 'i
s 4 a
'ca + .•,-.'..ti: Kr +wi+.: .'r'
a
t .
E
VIII.
SEVERANCE PROVISION
Should any one or more provisions of this Contract be held
to be null, void, voidable, or for an reason whatsoever, of no
force and effect, such provlsionM shall be construed as
severable from the remalyder of this Contract and shall not
affect the validity of all other provisions of this contract
which shall remain of full force and effect.
In WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto cause this Contract
and Agreement to be duly executed in triplicate this day
of , 1987.
TEXAS WAFER DEVELOPMENT BOARD
r BY:
EXECUTIVEsADMINISTRATOR
b ? CITY OF DENTONs ET AL
s
F~. BY:
`
"t - I
RAY STORENSt MAYOR
1
ATTEST:
CITY SEMT.W
.ITY OF D£NTON, TEXAS
j APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA 1
ADAMI DRAYOVITCH CITY ATTORNEY ~
i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
s PAGE 8
i
b r. ~,,fl rr.+ds=. .elrn. y.~r s..: •..^N .i-:SMs1P ~4.~-Y$1YDYxY
.P
i
I .
I
i
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UPILITIES BOARD
Meeting of January 14, 1987
r
34 b11w ORbIM MC!! A>'pR0V1NQ A COMTIIACT WITH TR! TBxAS
Apr/
Nelson explained Dentonis relationship with the Texas Mater
Derelopeent Soard and with Mnton County re#srdinp this
project, poison stated that Denton (city and county) is
the first community to Texas to take such a reitionnt
emphasis, and therefore comes closer then any other to
eeerintt the spirit that the Texas Mater Pavel Pont intended
with tl►is grant program, Coomes commended Kelson for his
work on'this project.
COO010'0 raved to approve the subject Contract. !Cady
I' '041006d. All AY.%s# no nays, nation carried unantsioualy,
-
P / a .ter. i _ I
141
t i
4
y i ; 41'.1
x a w„a w ti:,•.;:.., n.fiC'45'81~. Asd./w.•
?tip
y 6
s
j
4
F
e e
y
PLANNING AREA
7" s T MOWN
I
OM
M r4r 116"r
alum
mod"
A
916461 464 • 1181461 II.II
•99.9.94 ~w
9.6 9.•4111.
•••e..•. 9169/91•
91.•6
• •91414499
h ••6.61 94.9 • • 6446
Mh. 1149448 44// ••04e46
•
Sy 9••496 6.999••/ • • ::9 r•
eaam 11.9.91• •6
•416.4e*
yI _ 444464/6/ ;4 6 414•
9646•••:• 6 • 44
• 1 •
6046000
/666/84.9 641 • 06
•.641•:1 6 •6•
y 46.4••1••6 •44 4•
r'., 44466•:99•:•4 646
••6.44••64• 19~ r.r .
1/:4146:.
14.44444646
y,~ •14191/4/•
~ •46.61.41••••
r .....4.....4.6 .•44 u4~
a GOP
$$of 19•N6• .1814 466648
4', y. 'i 4.62'6669 9•••'
4y^ ar 1.Oe /mow 16111116
MISS
7
rwe = 14r~
.169 •)~M 1111 t H
f . r "
R , s
01
MAW
e4~ e
Gme
r am 9 O
* /61110 1161611 /ash. a Miff
•Iff 166161 IIUI
rr~'T
i
PACE "i'
w t 166 .
The e'laaalnd Area' eenalale N 0#04611 Cetrnty ereludtae Ike area aeuth and
.41 (rest el Oenten Off". (Water SefVlee ►lanninl let the exelvded area
r lot Deats$ Col has been aeeeotea as a feaeenalblilty by etheraj
It - -It -
i
CITY OF DENTON -WATER SERVICE AREA
I • Y • • ,
1 r
b.
am -
111}. • 1 ' ' , '
1• t
4 y
'Wir
~E OENTON SERVICE AREA
Dona 15.
EXHIBIT A
PARTICIPATING AGENCIES A ENTITIES
WITH ASSOCIATED FEES
Bartonville Water Supply Corp. 121203
12000 + (3020 minus ee11643) x 10[)
j Bartonvills, Texas, Town of !1,080
31000 + (80S x l0[)
• Carrollton, Texas, City of
85400 + (24034 x lot)
Colony, Texas, City of l5171S
14000 + (17,150 x lot)
Copper Canyon, Taxes. Town of 011064
81000 + (ee8 x lot)
Corinth, Texas
. City o ,
82000 x (2600 x.laU !2,280
s Dallas, Texas, City of (maximum commitment) fu0,DQ0
• Denton% Texas, City of
loge) !10,310
E• Isaac + (L31100 x .
s Denton, COUNTY 01 (maximum commitment) 81001000
Flower Mound, Texas, Town of (maximum commitment) !5,000
84000 + (11,600 x .10)
Highland Village, Texas, City of 831505
83000 + (Soso x lot)
Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority 83020
y 83000 + (7200 x lot)
f~ a Lewisville, Texas, City of
83000 + (371200 x -lot) 88,720
i Little Elm, Texas, Town of 81,115
81000 + (1150 x lot)
1 Pondar, Texas, Town of 811032
81000 + (325 x lot)
Sanger, Taxes, Town of 112,385
✓ 82000 r (3850 x loge)
f 7SW Incorporated lister Company 811081
'n goon + (elo x lot)
TOTAL, 1117~~ 147
a Select Committee Member
PARTICIPATION FORRULAi
Flak fees e - 'i,oon 81,ono
i,~oo - s~nao l2,oro
5,0110 - i0,o00 831000
101000 - 25,000 14000
over 25,000 151000
• Po u t On Fast
n add tion, each municipality or water supply entity
would pay a per capita fee of lot par capita.
Notaa1 ~
r lf"'~opulation numbers are January 11 1986 PICTC06 estimates'
2) Population for Bartonville Water Supply Corporation
excludes 00 cities of Bartonville and Copper Canyon
w since these cities are independent participants in the
study*
j 3) Population for Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority,'
1 BartonPille Water Supply Corporation and TSW Inc., Water
Company are estimated by methodologyi Number of
connections multiplied by 3 residents per connection
equals population.
N.
x
{
t
.
;f
I:
(I
i
I
t
k D R A F T ,
January 2L, 1487
c
1
STATE OF TEXAS }
1 COUNTY OF DENTON } EXHIBIT B
i
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
1987, by and between Denton County on behalf of thi-Farticipating
i' Agenciesr Steering COMMITTEE as listed in Exhibit B, her
a, referred to as the "COMMITTEE" einafter
, and Espay Huston L Associates, Inc.,
Engineering t Environmental Consultants hereinafter, referred to as
"ENGINEER".
i
WHEREAS, Denton County, on behalf of the COMMITTEE desires the
~r. professional services of ENGINEER to
to serve as the COMMITTEE'S Perform e in ns services,
Professional engineering g consultant snd
advisor in connection with a Study to evaluate and make
recommendations for providing water and wastewater services to
Denton. County Communities and water/wastewater supply entities
s needing wholesale services as described in Exhibit A, "Scope of
York" hereinafter referred to as the "STUDY"3 and,
WHEREAS, Denton'County has designated the COMMITTEE to serve as
the Representative for Denton County with and bat wean Dentin County
Z) and the ENGINEER and, furthermore, Denton County and the COMMITTEE
designates Robert E. Nelson, P.E. as the Committee's PROJECT MANAGER
who shall work under the authority of the COMMITTEE's Chairperson,
County Commissioner Lee Walker, to coordinate the da -
activities of the STUDY3 and, y to day
WHEREAS, Denton County has designated the SELECT COMMITTEE to
S assist Robert E. Nelson, P.E. with these PROJECT MANAGER duties,
SELECT COMMITTEE being designated by asterisk on Exhibit e attached
hereto,
NOW TH£REFORE, COMMITTEE and ENGINEER, for the mutual
consideration hereinafter stated, agree and understand as follows+
I. Scope of Services for ENGINEER
A. The Scope of Services to be rendered under' this
Agreement is set forth in Exhibit A, attached to and
made a part hereof. Deviations from the attached Scope t
d - of services or other provisions of this Agreement, m,y S
only be made by, written agreement authorized by tie
COMMITTEE and the County of Denton.
r j
PAGE 1
i
1
r
i
1
II. Additional Services
A• If authorized by COMMITTEE, the County of Denton and
the additional services related to the assignment will
be performed by ENGINEER for an additional rofesonal
fee on a time and materials basis in accordanceslwith
ENGINEER+S rate schedule, attached as Exhibit C or on
a different basis as the parties may otherwise agree.
III. COMMITTEE's Responsibilities
A. COMMITTEE shall do the following in a timely manner so
P{ as not to delay the services of ENGINEERN I
~e
i' 1• Provide all criteria and full Information as to '
\ COMMITTEE'S requirements for the STUDY and
^ d
esignate in writing a person with authority to
act an
concerningCtheISTUDYS behalf on all matters j
` 2• furnish to ENGINEER all existing reports and
3 other available date
obtain or pertinent to the STUDY,
authorize ENGINEER to obtain or
and Vifurnishtito 1ENreports GINEER aservicesasof' required,
others
required for the
performance of ENGINEERIS
services hereunder, and ENGINEER shall be j
entitled to use and rely
information and services provided upon by all such
COMMITTEE
` or others In
under this Agreemi trorming ENGINEER►S services
3
30 Arrange for access to and make all
for ENGINEER to. enter upon provisions blic property as required for ,ENGINEER Ito perform
p services hereunder. perform
Perform such other functions as are indicated in
Exhibit A, "Scope of Services".
3• Bear all costs incidental with the requirements
of this Section III.
b. Provide labor and safety equipment to inspect or
{
investigate any existing facilities as
by the ENG required
WEER
s_ IV. Period of Service
4 A- ENGINEERS basic services will commence within fifteen
eS) days of the date of this Agreement and the 'final
report "(Item 5.3 of Scope of Services) shall be i
- i submitted by August 31, 1164?
t
PAGE 2
. +ai 'h.F•p.~;.s^.!; .av'.Visi,yrre°'-'
f
' 9. If for any reason ESPEY, NUSTON s ASSOCIATES, INC., is
unable to complete its performance called for under the
terms of this contract an or before August 311 12187,
and is unable to deliver the final report on or before
November 30, 14871 the County of Denton and the
COMMITTEE hereby agree to consider negotiating a new
contract period. The. COMMITTEE must, however, be `
notified in writing fifteen (is) working days prior to
the date for completion of the work program or
thirty-five (3S) days prior to the date for submittal
of the final report.
I
! C. If for any reason, the State of Texas reduces or
eliminates the State grants which have been promised or
relied upon, the County of Denton and the COMMITTEE
reserve the right to terminate this Agreement. Upon
termination, all services rendered up to the date of
termination will be paid tor, and upon such payment,
all documents will be turned over to the COMMITTEE.
D. ENGINEER'S basic services under this Agreement will be
considered complete at the earlier of (1) the date when
item 3.6 in Scope of York is accepted by COMMITTEE or
(2) sixty (60) days after the date whom the report is
submitted for final acceptance, plus in each case, if
applicable, such additional time as may be considered
. reasonable for obtaining approval of "governmental
authorities having jurisdiction to approve the STUDY.
E. ENGINEER'S additional services will be performed and
completed within the time period agreed to in writing
by the parties at the time such services are authorized.
- V. Payments to ENGINEER
+ A. COMMITTEE shall authorize payment to ENGINEER for
" services rendered hereunder as indicated in Exhibit A,
Scope of Services.
d.
9. ENGINEER shall submit statements for basic and
additional services rendered monthly. Such statements
a` shall be complete and detailed. COMMITTEE shall Insure
prompt payments in response to ENGINEER'S statements.
s
? C. ENGINEERS charges are on the basis of
of statements rendered and continuous prompt payment
z work on the STUDY until submission of the report, of the
• D. The ENGINEER shall be compensated for services
indicated in Exhibit A, Scope of Services, on the bass j
of salary cost times a multiplier of 2.4, plus other
PAGE 3
x {
fee to irectnexpen es plus subcontractor cost with the total
d
authorization of exthed County~0o01 De !anal and r then
COMMITTEE.
E. "Salary Cost" (illustrated in attached current Standard
Rate Schedule) used herein Is defined as the cast of
salaries of managers, engineers, technicians, drafts-
men, stenographers, surveymen, clerks, laborers, etc.,
for time directly chargeable to the STUDY by ENGINE£RtS
personnel, plus social security contributions, unem-
ploym~nt, excise and payroll taxes, employment compen-
sation insurance, medical and other 'insurance benefits,
sick leave, vacation, holiday pay and contributions to
a pension or retirement plan. (Currently, salary cost
is equal to 1.32 times direct salary payments. This
factor is adjusted annually)-
F. Other direct expenses shall include
repro-
duction expense, communication expense., travel, j
trans-
portation and subsistence away from Dallas and other
i miscellaneous expense directly related to the work,
II including costs of laboratory analysis, tests, and
' other work required to be done by Independent persons
j or agents.
h '
G. Under no circumstances shall any statement for services
exceed the value of work performed at the time a E
statement is renderad.
H. It is specifically understood and agreed that the
' ENGINEER shall not be authorized or required to
undertake any work pursuant to this Agreement which
would require additional payments by the COMMITTEE of
any emerge, expense or reimbursement above the maximum
1 j fee as stated without having first obtained
authorization from the COMMITTEE, written
I. Should the COMMITTEE fail to make payment to the
a ENGINEER of the sum named in any partial or final
stateM
ant when payment is Fast due for more than
forty-five (4S) daysi, then the COMMITTEE shall pay to
the ENGINEER, in addition to the sum shown as due by
such statement. interest thereon at the rate of I
' percent per month from the date- due, as
herein, until fully aidi provided
j any injury to the EX6INEERwarising afrom such delayatn
payment.
Included within the Scope of Services for this STUDY is
a budget of 112 500 for consultation i+ith subcontracted
Hutchison, Price, Coyle t Brooks, Inc. for legal and
f First Southwest, Inc. for financial services-
PAGE 4
rt.
e r
4
VI. Cost Control
A. COMMITTEE'S budgetary requirements and considerations
r in respect to the STUDY are set forth in Exhibit a.
i
1 a. Opinions of probable construction cost, financial
evaluations, feasibility studies, economic analyses of
alternate solutions and utilitarian considerations of
operations and maintenance costs prepared by ENGINEER
hereunder will be made on the basis of ENGINEER'S
experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER'S
best judgment as an experienced and qualified design
professional.
t
i VII. General Considerations
i
A. Neither COMMITTEE nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or
transfer any rights under or interest in (including,
but without limitation, monies that may become due or
monies that are due) this Agreement without the written
consent of the other, except to the extent that any
assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law
or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by
law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any
written consent to an assignment, no assignment will
release or discharge the assignor from any duty or
responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained
in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing
such independent professional associates,
subcontractors and ronsultants as ENGINEER ray deem
+ appropriate to assist in the performance of services
hereunder.
S. Nothing undar this Agreement shall be construed to give
iR any rights or benefits In this Agreement to anyone
other than COMMITTEE and ENGINEER, and all duties and
responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement
will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of COMMITTEE
and ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party.
C• This Agreement (consisting of page 1 through page 17
inclusive) including Exhibits • constitute the entire
Agreement between COMMITTEE and ENGINEER and supersede
all prior written or oral understandings. This
t Agreement and said Exhibits may only be amended,
supplemented, modified or, cancelled by a duly executed
written instrument.
' In the event the ENGINEER'S Project Manager or key
Y members of the project team are removed from this
STUDY, the COMMITTEE will have the right to interview
and approve or disapprove of replacements. It an i
+ ENGINEER'S Project Manager satisfactory to the 4
COMMITTEE is not assigned, COMMITTEE shall have a right
~r to terminate this STUDY.
PAGE 5
F
.
I
VIII. Indemnification
} A. ENGINEER shall and does hereby agree to lndesnif
E hold harmless the COMMITTEE from any and all daaig@sd
loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, occasioned by
r ` any error, omission or negligent act of ENGINEER, its
a officers, agents, employees, invitees, and other
persons for whom it is legally liable, with regard to
the performance of this Agreement, and ENGINEER will,
at its cost and expense, defend and protect the
COMMITTEE against any and all such claims and demands
up to the amount of this contract.
IX. Melling Addresses i
•I
A. All notices and communications under this Agreement t
be mailed or delivered to 0
COMMITTEE
the address of the COMMITTEE'S PROJECT 1IMANAGER n with ,
copy to Lee Walker I
County C
unless and until ENGINEER is otherwiseonotifiedl 0llows,
' i
Robert E. Nelson, P•E., Project Manager '
'r City of Denton Utility Department f
21S E. McKinney St.
Denton, Texas 76201
Lee Walker, County Commissioner, Precinct 3 j
212 W. Sycamore St.
Denton, Texas 762bl'
s e• Notices and communications to be mailed or delivered,to -
P$ ENGINEER shall be sent to the address of ENGINEERas
5:, nfol otified: Unless and until PROJECT MANAGER is olharWise
~r
Espey, Huston t Associates, Inc.
4 17811 Waterview Parkway, Suite $00
Dallas, Tx 73252
' ATTNI Thomas E. Taylori P*E.
:
r
Director of Municipal Services
C. Any notices and communications'requirod to be glean in
writing by one party to the other shall be con
having boon given to the sddresseo on the date considered
notice or communication is posted by the sending party,
w• EE
i
PAGE 6
it, 1.. m4
Y
1
:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have made and
executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above Written.
ENGINEER
n F ESPEV, HUSTON L ASSOCIATES, INC. i
ATTESTi
(Title) BY
tie
DENTON COUNTY ON BEHALF Of
r COMMITTEE
Attests BY I
(Title) Title
E
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
COUNTY ATTORNEY
Byt
r,
5 a
°
tr
x,r x
y • I
~r+ i r i
PAGE 7
r
r~ ~ L4aFe i:.o-. ~ i. sgivr kaG+a.L ,T19.'~F
,a a.~ a.a, k«.Ona'Ak (U's LV w. rva,v- r « Y
.t.. a
Y,
2
t
I,
f.
f
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
&g OM of Stud a The purpose of this STUDY is to evaluate and to
make recoevmendat ons for providing water and wastewater service to
Denton County communities and water and wastewater supply entities
needing wholesale service, now or in the future, in the service area
of the regional water supply system operated by the City of Dallas
(generally defined as all of Denton County with exception of the
area south and southwest of Denton Creek but subject to other minor
exclusions or inclusions). (map attached) See also City of Denton
potential water service area (map attached).
Grant As istances The City of Denton, on behalf of Denton County I
communities and water/wastewater supply entitles have applied to the
Texas Water Development Beard for
COMMITTEE will grant assistance for this STUDY. i
and ENGINEER wiprlepare
reviewo s such (reports status
technical accuracy required, and
completeness.
Communi ationse In order to keep participating entities advised of
progress, a Newsletter will be prepared by the ENGINEEe: and mailed
on a monthly basis to a sailing list not to exceed 200 addresses.
1.0 Preliminary Assessment
1.1 ENGINEER i PROJECT MANAGER will identify data to be
collected and furnished by participating agencies.
1.2 Review published reports furnished by the participating
agencies.
1.3 Conduct one on one interviews with each of the
{ following participating agencies.
E` Bartonvilla Water Supply Corp.
Town of Bartonville, Texas
City of Carrollton, Texas
City of the Colony, Texas
' Town of Copper Canyon, Texas j
City of Corinth, Texas
k, City of Dallas, Texas
t. City of Denton, Texas
County of Denton, Texas
Town of Flower Hound, Texas
^ City of Highland Village, Texas
Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority
City of Lewisville, Texas
town of Little Elm, Texas
Town of Ponder, Texas
^ City of Sanger, Texas
TSW Incorporated Water Company i
Other entities may agree to
later, date. participate costs of this STUDY at a
In that avant, additional interviews (not to exceed j
five unless authorized by the County of Denton and the COMMITTEE)
Will be required.
PAGE 8
I
f
1.4 Review additional reports furnished by the y participating
agencies for background information and for data
concerning population and demand projection. Such
reports include, but may not be limited to the followings
*Long Range Water Demand Forecasts, Dallas Water '
Utilities Service Area- CH2M Hill, August 1484
*Analysis of Water Service Area- Peat Marwich and
Mitchell, may 1980
I
;Report on feasibility Study for Aubrey (Ray Roberts) i
Lake- URS Company, 1977 i
*Report on Long Range Water Supply Study to Meet
Requirements to the Year 2050 for the City of Dallas,
Texas, !IRS Company, March 1475
*Water Supply Study for City of Denton- Freese a Nichols,
June 1462
*Water Supply Study for City of Lewisville- Shimak,
Jacobs and finklea, 1462 (revised 1465)
*Water Service Area. Questionnaire, Dallas Water
Utilities, April 1965 j
*Conditions of Service for Treated Water Wholesale
' Customers, Cite of Dallas, January 1965
NOTEI The a►,ove information is on file in the Planning
' Division of Dallas Water Utilities in Room 4AS of Dallas
City Hall.
1.5 Ldwntify other entiteas in Denton County that have
4* responsibility for x-.y providlnD water or wastewater services...
1.6 Develop base map for project area.
° 1.7 As directed by he Project Manager, meet with other
identified en
tici..r
not t
' o exceed two group meetings).
31 1-8 Det4rmine, from information and data provided by each
entity, the water and wastewater services area of each
participating agency and/or the other identified entities
in Denton County.
i
1.4 Develop a draft work plan which shall include a proposed
schedule for each phase of work.
1 1.10 Conduct work session with Steering Committee. {
~ •i
1.11 Finalize the work plan.
1.12 P;-apart and submit twenty-five (25) copies of Phase 1,0
a 41. report to the Project Manager.
,3. PAGE 4
~F olrx `.11 '...Y` ra,.u...h9p+'...✓1'r NY.vi.44r.~~".Gr S. Y.k'~11^%.
y
J
1.13 Conduct review session of Phase 1.0 report with Steering
Committee.
2.0 Analysis. Defining the Dimensions of the Protects
2.1 flake an inventory of existing, committed, and planned
water and wastewater facilities and their capacities from
information furnished by participating and
non-participating agencies.
2.2 fleet with various agencies that may have information or
who may be affected by the STUDY, including, but not
limited to the following agencies
Texas State Highway Department
Railroads
11a or Pipeline Companies
Major Can and Electric Utilities
U. S. Corps of Engineers
Texas Water Commission
Water Development Board
North Central Texas Council of Governments
Trinity River Authority North Texas Mrnidpal Water DisNIct
City of Ft. Worth, Texas
North Texas Industrial Commissiori
2.3 Develop low, most probable, and. high ~snual population
projections for the study area requirements for
Increments of five (5) years through 2010. Use North
Central Texas Council of Government's data as the base
,.1 population projection and supplement with input from the
respective Steering Committee entities and other
Y a appropriate data.
s-
2.4 Estimate future per capita consumption of water and of
wastewater discharges.
2.5 Develop low, most
probable, and high projections for
d future water demands for average and peak, drought and
r ? normal conditions. Projections should be in increments of
l five years.
w 2-L Project low, most probable and high >rojections for
future wastewater, treatment requirements for increments
of five (5) years through 2010•
247 Identify existing untreated water resources available to
serve the study areal deteraime yield expected to be
available to study areal consult with Dallas Water
UtIIItias.
2.8 Determine need for supplemental untreated water resources
and identify potential sources which may be needed to
meet anticipated long-term requirements.
1 PAGE 10 i
i
i
1
2.9 Establish capability and willingness of existing major
entities within project area to meet projected water and
wastewater demands of the project area.
2.10 Meet one on one with each participating entity and review
r ! ^ STUDY results.
2.11 Conduct workshop with Steering Committee. ,
{ 2.12 Identify alternative strategies, considering near term i
i and long term requirements, with emphasis on
institutional agencies for providing water and wastewater
services over the next twenty-five (25) years. Specific
alternatives to be evaluated Include, but shall not be
limited to the following$ k
2.12.1 Untreated water service from Dallas to
other entities (either existing or proposed) which
could provide treated water service to customers in i
the service area.
2.12.2 Partnership arrangement between cities to
construct water or wastewater treatment plants for
benefit of the contracting parties.
• 2.12.3 Creation of an entity or entities such as
utility districts to be sponsored and established
by the customers having a need for water or
wastewater service.
2.12.4 Enlargement of service area of existing.
cities (Denton, Lewisville and others) which
alroady have water or wastewater treatment plants
A,
' j in Denton County.
2.12.5 Service to be provided by an established
water or wastewater service entity which may to may
not prosently provide service in the Denton County
service area (Dallas, Trinity River Authority, ate).
2.13 Prepare and submit twenty-five (25) copies of Phase 2.0
report to the Project Manager.
2.14 Conduct review session of Phase 2.0 Report with Steering
Committee.
k
3.0•% Evaluation of Alternatives$
3.1 Evaluate feasibility of existing entities to expand their
service areas to most all or a portion of the project
area.
` r f .f
` PAGE 11
f r
~ . ~ - .~,.n...: ~indJl.m i%: 99~"•P1M7i4 ~f.ya '
r y',
3.2 To discuss Item 3.1 above, meet with the major 'agencies
-i including:
City of Dorton
City of Lewisville
City of Dallas
North Texas Municipal Water District
Trinity River Authority
I I~
3.3 Evaluate previously Identified alternatives and determine
"most feasible" alternatives (S to IS). Match water and
wastewater In workable combinations.
3.4 With aid of a computer model, evaluate in depth the "mcst
fusible" alternatives--documenting costs, advantages and
disadvantages.
3.S Consult with legal one, financial advisors concerning the
alternative institutional strategies.
3-6 Develop legal organisational structures with
' recommendations for service contract concepts and
conditions of service required.
3.7 Make field reconnaissrnce of the area as needed to
determine probable location of proposed facilities for
water and sewer.
308 Assess infrastructure requirements for "most feasible"
"t alternatives and evaluate technical feasibility.
r1 3.'t Conduct Workshop with Steering Committee to evaluate
J alternatives.
x,, 3.10 Taking into account the results of the workshop and the
advice and comments of the Steering Committee, marrow the
alternatives to three general strategies (or service
plans) considering technical, legal, policy and financial
constraints.
3.11 Conduct interviews with major entities that would be
effected by the alternative strategies to ensurer
conceptual agreement with their proposed roles in such
plans.
3.12 Prepare and submit twenty-five (25) copies of Phase 3.0
report to the Project Manager.
3.13 Conduct review session of Phase 3.0 report With Steering
Committee.
as 4 ~
i
i
PACE 12
r
s F~.
F
ll
4.0 Development of Infrastructure Plans3
4.1 For each of the top three recommended institutional
alternatives, develop an infrastructure plan.
4.2 Prepare implementation schedules and preliminary cost
estimates for recommended service alternatives.
4.3 Identify key political/policy/regulatory/legal steps for
implementation. y
4.4 Provide recommendations for financial and legal
strategies for funding initial costs and annual operation
and maintenance costs. Provide estimates of potential
customer rates under recommended alternatives.
4-S Identify probable initial capital cost
continuing contractual relationships between ip suppliers
and customers under recommended alternatives.
4.6 Workshop with Steering Committee to review and fine-tune
the recommended alternative strategies. !
4.7 Prepared and submit twenty-five (25) copies of phase 40
report to Project Manager, f
5.0 Reporting
Ede
5.1 Submit a draft of Final Report and Executive Summary to
Project Manager.
5.2 Steering Committee work session to review final report
and Executive Summary.
5.3 Prepare Final Report and separately bound Executive
t>~'w Summary and submit two hundred (200) copies to Steering
I Committee,
t i S.4 Participate in presentation(s) of final recommendations
(not to exceed five (S) presentations'.
E
r: ! 5.5 Submit documentation report of workin
Manager. 9 Papers to project
S.6 Meet with Steering Committee for closing remarks.
A-1 r`
PAGE 13
"
6
5
l
1
I
3e .
PLANNING AREA
w rr~■
-w seemed
wMddp
a>rllw e1~11 ~
INHI 111 E~
• 11•IIN 1•HII
il• er/1.1
•11•111111
•1••/
111 .11•
•1.1.111•
1•••111••
111.11 •1.1• • N •
/•U it / ' j
840 0 6 40 4
` •11••1•• l,••••
`pp •••••i••yTi•••• 11 Iiiii• /ii
I •11.1.1••1• •111
r~ ••INI••• ► •
N ►/1.1 •/;i • •f ii
_ • N •1.11.1 •r
N •••11.11••1 ••1 ,
1i /1~ r wide
1.1••••1•
' . i••I1 11111 L
` /••1••1.11•••
U • • 11117
~ •111•
/.~•Ir• 11.11• r
1114 •111••• •/u• 1HIN
. yam. 1.1111•• '
X9'1 / 'r 1111 / 11
Ism
r ~r
i
I~ - • •
Models!
' •>~M I / 11111
! T
1 Y elg, r •
stl
y .
/e1 •le•r 111111 i.
111H11 111
" sale lfselle 41611
1
I 1
PACE y~
TING of: •plemalse Ars4. consists of OostoM COMM111 oxsfYd14il the area moth an!
west at DAMtON Grook$ (wator service PIa4M01ip for the excluded Voa
0444001 04• has boss 44400tod as a rsooshaikllltY by Hhom)
f
,r
CITY OF DENTON. WATER SERVICE AREA
1 1 . . 1
Y 1 f
A ~ , ~ Y I I I 1• Y I 1• Y Y• I. r
1 ■
T r , . 1 oil
1
pww
V '1'
or
1. ,~7 I Y f 1~
• ` I • f •r i • ` 4 •ri
1 • r y1
• A .1t
• i l I
old
.•..r.z•
' •
ylj. I
. ` I }
qnFl
•I '
1 a, n
r
III
Y X r 1 ISM
• • 1 • • 1 • 1 • a I 1 1 . • Y / 1 • 1 • 1
~N DENTON 8E1MVICE AREA
DACR J,S
r
EXHIBIT-9-
PARTICIPATING AGENCIES t ENTITIES
WITH ASSOCIATED FEES
Bartonvills Water Supply Corp.
r 12000 + (31720 minus *1111643) x 1Qt) 12,203
Barlonvills, Texas, Town of
I1,Q80
I100Q • (80S x 104t)
a Carrollton, Texas, City of 17,19?
15,000 + (24,434 x 104)
Colony, Taxes, City of IS,71S
14000 • (171150 x lot)
Copper Ccnyon, Texas, Town of !1,089
11000 + (888 x 104o
Corinth, Tetras, City of
12000 x (2800 x .lot) 121280
e Dallas, Texas. City of (maximum commitment) IuO,P('D
s Denton, Taxes, City of •11,310
Isaac + (63,100 x .104)
• Denton, COUNTY Of (maximum commitment) IlOQ,000
Flower Mound, Texas, Town of (maximum commitment) $S,OQo
14000 + (11,800 x •10)
Highland Village, Texas, City of 13,505
83000 + (SOSO x 104)
Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority 13,720
113000 ♦ (7200 x I0t)
Lewisville, Texas, City of 118020
15000 + (37400 x •109)
Little Elm, Tsxas, Town of 11,115
t ` 11000 + (1150 x lo[)
Ponder, Texas, Town of 1110??
11000 + (32S x 100
Sanger, Texas, Town of !2,385
12000 ♦ (38S0 x 10[)
TSW Incorporated Water Company ill,oel
111000 + (810 x lo!)
TOTAL I117~', l47
a Select Committee Member
" PARTICIPATION FORMULAI
' Flat fees
e -
0 1,QOP
11,0
' 11000 - S,oco Bal 0
Sloro 10,000 131000
101000 251000 14,000
over 25,000 05,000
" Pon feel
In addition, each Municipality or water supply entity
would pay a per capita fee of l0[ par capita.
opulation numbers arm January 1, 1986
NCTCOG estimates,
2) Population for Bartonville Water Supply Corporation
excludes (to) cities o! Bprtonville end Copper Canyon
since these cities are independent participants in the f
' study. i
3) Population for Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority, it
fartonville Water Supply Corporatiori and TSW Inc., Water
Company are estimated by methodology Humber of
W connections multiplied by 3 residents per connection
equals population.
p~r.~
EXHIBIT C
ESPEY, HUSTON A ASSOCIATES, INC.
STANDARD RATE SCHEDULE
Personnel
Personnel cost is reimbursed based on a multiplier of 2.4
applied to salary cost. Salary cost for each employee is based
on the employee's actual hourly wage plus benefits. Ranges of
hourly salary cost by personnel classification are as follows
Principal 236.00 to 170,00
Associate Staff 825.00 to IS0.00 E
` Senior Project Staff a?0.00 to 145.00
Project Staff 1:2.00 to 130.00
Technical Support 16.00 to 120.00 i
+ Clerical Support 16.00 to 116.00
l
r Survey Field Craws
i
Survey crows are available at fixed hourly party rags.
Three (3) man field Crew 175.00 per hour
,Ir Electronic Distance
Measuring Equipment No charge
There is no mileage charge for survey crew vehicles when the
job 'site is within fifty (50) miles of the office' from which
the survey crew originatas.
1 b
Travel a Subsistence
All !ravel and subsistence expenses are Invoiced at actual
wy cost, Cost of mileage on company-owned vehicles is computed at
a rate of 28L per mile. Cost for,company•owned four wheel
drive vehicles is computed at a rats of 280 per mile plus
125.00 per day.
'r Purchased Services
1 f
All purchased services are invoiced at actual cost, These
E include but are not limited to reproduction, computer time,
~F long distance' telephone, consultants, subcontract services,
f" rented or leased equipment, and expandable supplies.
)
WE 17
j
,
Terms
invoices are submitted monthly for all services rendered and
are payable "Met 4S- days." late payments will Incur a late
charge of an* and one-half (l.S) percent per month from the
original date of invoke.
I
,I
yam. 1 ~
~ r
, 1J1J1J
b y N
f
fill
r
~IpM. h
h
1
} a PACE 18
.
•
'f' +MMdalNtl."' }{~'xYT~OI♦rF'JHS/vYM~YM.wnYar.r..
t
=d
i
EXHIBIT D
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
i r
i'
The Contract Between the City of Denton and
the Texas Water Develop2ent Board for
s Grant Funds.
r !
~ I
t~ E ! .a
41
j
n G~te Ii1
i.
a
J
of r ~1, i, Y ~ `yY_
j ~preaw.. a.y,~u .,,rtsw+r.c,m+..rw ww,M.+.YCr.Itai,iCMa`:piVwlN!.i:.I'.w~l:n,.v'.w-'
4 n,p l
r
r~ n
iRy 1.
'i
~ e Fi i
Y:
c.
~ d.
of
`I
A4
A
F
e
j.
F
I
41 `LY
q ~
1 r tl
a i
~v"ir F
4 1 ,
F' 1
l '
rfN 1 t;~ ~ ' ~ r
1
i
k 4
LS
ry'e j k .r
E ]E
{a .1'f f
E 1E:
k ~S
~w 6
?y ,J; lyyl:
.4 H-
J .~,~''yryyyrr+NU.w.•eros . _ ~-.,.n~arolK'J4Fd1AtFINFi1P„^ _ -
t it
A
1
y
a.~
j
DATE: February 1987 ,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
e !0I
T0: Y
r. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrel, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH
DENTON
t
COUNTY FOR A WATER/WASTEWATER STUDY OF DENTON COUNTY.
TY,
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board at their meeting of January I
14, recommended approval of the contract.
SUMMARY:
This Contract is necessary to assign to the County the
funds and responsibilities of a contract between the
City of Denton and the Texas Water Development Board
{TWDB}, The Contract with T,4DB provides 504 funding
up to $125,000 for a water/wastewater study for the
Denton County area,
r BACKGROUND:
A Committee consisting of representatives from 14
+ cities, towns, and water suppliers has been formed to
study the long-term supply, treatment, and trans- j
mission of water and the collection and treatment of
wastewater for Denton County. This Committee has
recommended and the County is expected to contract
with Espey, Huston 6 Associates, Inc., to conduct the
study, The City of Denton, on behalf of the Committee
rti and Denton County, received a grant from the TWDB to
help pay for the study.
Denton County, according to State Law, was not able to
apply for the grant because it is not a stIpplier of
a water, Since the TWDB is contracting with the city of
Denton and has outlined certain responsibilities re- I
P 1~
I quired of the study in return for the 501 funding and
since Denton County is contracting with Espey, Huston
6 Associates, Inc. far such responsibilities, Denton
x 1 via this contract assigns responsibilities of the
study and the corresponding fundirg to Denton County,
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR_ GROUPS AFFECTEDi I
City nF Denton, Denton County, other Denton County
' Cities and Water Suppliers,
V.; ~ ..,w.i:+.«, V ►.1,.:ar ~,+9MM,~wwt..rr.., ip.nm ~fir. '
f
{t ,
1 FISCAL IMPACTi
i
The $125,000 TWDB grant is expected to finance 501 of
the study which in turn could save Denton
approximately $5,000.
Respe ully submitted:
o a e
Prep ed bye Cit Manager
° R. Es Nelson
y Director of Utilities
APP~yed_.
Nelson
I 4> Director Utilities
Attachment 1: Contract with Denton County
21 Participating Agencies and Entities
3: Contract between Denton County and Espey, Huston
y. & Associates
,H 4: Minutes PUB, January 14, 1987
r
v '
` kx
J.t it
~ Jk i t r' i'~ 1 r
1:A
Y.A
f
.Y
it I a v r
i
a
i5
"I F
it "•i Yr
, 0.
` 1'I 1
ti
1713L
1
f NO.
i AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON
AND DENTON COUNTY FOR A WATER AND WASTEWATER STUDY; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
` THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the Mayor and City Socretary are hereby authorized and
'directed to execute and attest, respectively, the agreement
between the City of Denton, and Denton County, providing for a
study for long range supply, treatment and transmission of water
<< and the collection and treatment of wastewater for areas within
Denton County under the terms and conditions being contained in
said agreement which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
} SECT IT I,1_
That this ordinance shall bacome effective immediately upon
-its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of
KAY STU
CITY OF DENT ON, TEXAS
f
,i
r
ATTEST:
Fs J: `1r
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
DENTON, TEXAS
CITY OF
" APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
M n~ /
BYI
F i
a J. P /
l
• '1 r:.+:p+... t»V.Y yu..... .a.,.r.bi ~yvrW rAwL'.+HW1E'~.'F'nFi+'F
'a'pt
I
j
THE STATE OF TEXAS I CONTRACT FOR WATER/WASTEWATER
BY THE CI OF COUNTY OF DENTON 1 STUDYAND DENTONTCOUNTyENTON
This Contract is made and entered into this day of
1987, by and between the CITY OF ff NTGN, herein
after terms DENTON" and the COUNTY OF DENTON, hereinafter
termed "COUNTY", III
WHEREAS, A Committee as listed in Schedule A has been
established to study the long-range supply, treatment and
transmission of water and the collection and treatment of {
wastewater for the areas within Denton Countyl and,
WHEREAS, COUNTY, on behalf of Committee is contracting with
Espey, Huston and Associates, Inc., for engineering services to
conduct such a study; and,
WHEREAS, DENTON, on behalf of the Committee and COUNTY, has
received a grant from the Texas Water Development Board to pay
for fifty percent (501) of the Study, not to exceed $125,000=
and,
WHEREAS, DENTON must enter into contract with the Texas
Water Development Board and agree to terms, conditions and
provisions therein regarding such Study in return for subject
funding; and,
w WHEREAS, all such terms, conditions and provisions are
included In tho contract between COUNTY and Espey, Huston and
Associates, Inc.;
r I
ae, I NOW, THEREFORE, DENTON and COUNTY, for the mutual
consideration hereinafter stated, agree and understand as
followsl
1, Contract for Study
The COUNTY will contract for study with Espey, Huston and
t Associates, Inc., such contract being Exhibit B, attached
hereto,
II. Contract for Grant
a, The COUNTY, acting through the Committee, will perform
all provisions of the contract between the CITY OF DENTON
and the Texas Water Development Board in such manner as
.a
. . «nwx': .,.:,w...r,r.... . . ,`r,.JSr•X r=~rw k,w'-$Y•afaai~•~''e
A
r
I
if COUNTY were party to such contract, subject contract
being Exhibit C attached hereto.
111. Grant Funds Provided
COUNTY will submit all invoices and purchase vouchers
from Espey, Huston and Associates, Inc., and all proof
of payments of such invoices by COUNTY to DENTON and
DENTON will submit such invoices, purchase vouchers and
inproof ordinee payment to the Texas Water Development Board with provisions outlined in Section III I
of Attachment 111, attached hereto for payment. DENTON
will pay COUNTY the full amount of all payments
received from the Texas Water Development Board within
fifteen (I5) days of receipt of such payments,
iv. Term of Contract
The term of this contract shall be through the
conclusion of the agreement between COUNTY and Espey, `
Huston 8 Associates, Inc, and through the conclusion of
the contract between DENTON and the Texas Water
" Development Board and through any such amendments or
extensions that may be agreed to by affected all
parties.
v. Mailing Addresses
A. All notices and communications under this contract
shall be mailed or delivered to DENTON or COUNTY
shall be sent as follows unless and until either {
patty is otherwise notified:
R City of Denton
215 E. McKinney St.
Denton, Texas 76201
s. ATTN: R, E. Nelson, P. E.
Director of Utilities
Lee Walker, County Commissioner, Precinct 3
212 W, Sycamore St.
Denton, Texas 76201
B, Any notices and communications required to be iven
in writing by one party to the other shah be
considered as haling been given to the addressee on
the date the notice or communication is posted by
' the sending party,
F. . r
i
PAGE 2 E
s 1
~ r.cti .v-wcr
}
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have made and I
i executed this contract as the day and year first
above written.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
r
;k
BY:
ATTESTt
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DEBRA ADAM2 DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
71
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
r
BY.
ti
l ,
DENTON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COURT
BY:
~A, rlns
ATTESTt
kk ` 7 1
PARILYN n l
APPROVED AS TO FORMt
Ir . I
"
y e. G
! ~ y.r ~ Tits
h f.o
COMTT MUM
' r
r
411
s PAGE 3
ri ar y
r r I i
fie
y
i
Attachment !
PARTICIPATING AGENCIES R ENTITIES
WITH ASSOCIATED FEES
Bartonville Water Supply Corp. 121203
12000 + (34720 minus +=1,693) x 10e)
Bartonville, Texas, Town of 111080
01000 + (8rs x 10[)
• Carrollton, Texas, City of 17042
154000 + (29034 x 10t)
Colony, Texas, City of 15015 f
14000 + (17,150 x lot)
Copper Canyon, Texas, Town of 11,089
11000 + (888 x Joe) $
Corinth, Texas, City of 12,280
12000 x (2800 x .10e)
k Dallas, Texas, City of (maximum commitment) 140,rrn
s Denton, Texas, City of 111,310
15000 + (63,100 x lot)
e Denton, COUNTY OF (maximum commitment), 1100,000
Flower Mound, Texas, Town of (maximum commitment) 15,000
' 14000 + (11,800 x .10)
Highland Village, Texas, City of 131505
i 13000 + (Soso x 10[)
Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority 13020
13000 + (7200 x lnt)
• Lewisville, Texas, City of 18,720
15000 + (37,200 x lot)
Little Elm, Texas, Tow, of 111115
{ 11000 + 0150 x lol')
Ponder, Texas, Town of 11,032
r9r < 11000 + (325 x 10e)
Sanger, Texas, Town of 121385
9200D + (3850 x lot)
TSW Incorporated Water Company
k,. 11000 + (810 x lot) 111081
TOTAL 1197,147 f
ti * Select Committee Member E
PARTICIPATION FORMULAr
f1lt.fill 0 - 1100D 11,000
11000
- 5000 Ic~,OrO
s,ono - 10,000 131000
10,000 - 254000 14000
over 25,OD0 151000
i o Ulation feel
n add Lion, each municipality or,
wwater supply entity
k would pay a per capita fee of Joe per capita.
Population numbers are January 11 1986 NCTCOG estimates.
2) Population for Bartonville (dater Supply Corporation
excludes (et) cities of Bartonville and Copper Canyon
since these cities are independent participants in the
;r study.
3) Population for Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority,
t Bartonville Water Supply Corporation and TSW Inc., Water
Company are estimated by methodo]ogyi Number of
' connections multiplied by 3 residents per connection
equals population.
^-v' ;i a7rh.
Garr 4
r <
07
;
r
is 1 ~
i
STATE OF TEXAS ATTACHMENT IT
COUNTY OF DENTON J
j
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT j
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
1987, by and between Denton County on behalf of the ParticipatTng
Agencies' Steering COMMITTEE as listed in Exhibit e, hereinafter
referred to as the 'COMMITTEE', and Espey Huston 6 Associates, Inc.,
Engineering 6 Environmental Consultants hereinafter referred to as
'ENGINEER".
WHEREAS, Denton County, on behalf of the COMMITTEE desires the f
professional services of ENGINEER to perform engineering services,
to serve as the COMMITTEE's professional engineering consultant and
advisor in connection with a Study to evaluate and make
recommendations for providing water and wastewater services to
Denton County Communities and water/wastewater supply entities
needing wholesale services as described in Exhibit At 'Scope of
Work" hereinafter referred to as the 'STUDY'; and,
m = r r
WHEREAS, Denton County has designated the COMMITTEE to serve as
the Representative for Denton County with and between Denton County
and the ENGINE' ,R and, furthermore, Denton County and the COMMITTEE
;T designates Rob!•t E. Nelson, P.E. as the Comm'•tee$s PROJECT MANAGER
q, who shall work under the authority of the Cvi.AITTEE's Chairperson, `
County commissioner Lee Walker, to coordinate the day-to-day
activities of the STUDY; and,
` f WHEREAS, Denton County has designated the SELECT COMMITTEE to
f assist Robert E, Nelson, P.E. with these PROJECT MANAGER duties,
SELECT COMMITTEE being designated by asterisk on Exhibit 8 attached
r hereto,
4; NOW THEREFORE, COMMITTEE and ENGINEER, for the mutual
consideration hereinafter stated, agree and understand as follows:
I. Scope of Services for ENGINEER
A. The Scope of Services to be rendered under this
}a, Agreement is set forth in Exhibit A, attached to and
k{f~ made a part hereof. Deviations from the attached scope
tir+~ of Services or other provisions of this Agreements may
' only be made by written agreement authorized by the
COMMITTEE and the County of Denton.
Y '
W~
a m
i:
S
PAGE 1
7. b
t ;`r~Y r
II, Additional Services
r. A. If authorized by the county of Denton and the
COMMITTEE, additional services related to the
assignment will be performed by ENGINEER for an {
additional professional fee on a time and materials
basis in accordance with ENGINEER'S rate schedule,
f attached as Exhibit C or on a different basis as the j
parties may otherwise agree. E
III. COMMITTEE's Responsibilittea
A. COMMITTEE shall do the following in a timely manner so
as not to delay the services of ENGINEER:
's 1. Provide all criteria and full information as to
COMMITTEE'S requirements for the STUDY and
designate in writing a person with authority to
act on COMMITTEE'S behalf on all matters
concerning the STUDY,
2, Furnish to ENGINEER all existing reports and
other available data pertinent to the STUDY,
'r obtain or authorize ENGINEER to obtain or
provide additional reports and data as required,
+ and furnish to ENGINEER services of others
required for the performance of ENGINEER'S
` - services hereunder, and ENGINEER shall be
entitled to use and rely upon all such
information and services provided by COMMITTEE {
or others in performing ENGINEER'S services
under this Agreement. "
3. Arrange for access to and make al', provisions
d a for ENGINEER to enter upon public and private
property as required for ENGINEER to perform
services hereunder.
4. Perform such other functions as are indicated in
Exhibit A, 'Scope of Services'.
51 Bear all costs incidental with the requirements
of this Section III,
6. Provide labor and safety equipment to inspect or
Investigate any existing facilities as required l
by the ENGINEER.
a. 2V, Period of Service
€ r A. ENGINEER'S basic services will commence within fifteen
(15) days of the date of this Agreement and the final
report (Item 5,3 of Scope of Services) shall be
4 submitted by August 31, 1967.
n
o.
ti
S ~I
PAGE 2
t
i I
{ B. If for any reason ESPEY, HUSTON & ASSOCIATES, INC., is
! unable to complete its performance called for under the
terms of this contract on or before August 31, 1987,
and is unable to deliver the final report on or before
' November 30, 1987, the County of Denton and the
COMMITTEE hereby agree to consider negotiating a new
contract period. The COMMITTEE must, however, be
notified in writing fifteen (15) working days prior to
the date for completion of the work program or
thirty-five (35) days prior to the date for submittal
of the final report.
1
C. If for any reason, the State of Texas reduces or
eliminates the State grants which have been promised or
relied upon, the County of Denton and the COMMITTEE
h reserve the right to terminate this Agreement. Upon
termination, all services rendered up to the date of
termination will be paid for, and upon such payment,
all documents will be turned over to the COMMITTEE.
;I
D, ENGINEER'S basic services under this Agreement will be
considered complete at the earlier of (1) the date when
r item 5.6 in Scope of Work is accepted by COMMITTEE or
12) sixty (60) days after the date when the report is
submitted for final acceptance, plus in each case, if
x applicable, such additional time as may be considered
• reasonable for obtaining approval of governmental
authorities having jurisdiction to approve the STUDY.
E. ENGINEER'S additional services will be performed and
completed within the time period agreed to in writing
by the parties at the time such services are authorized.
V. Payments to ENGINEER
As COMMITTEE shall authorize payment to ENGINEER for
services rendered hereunder as indicated in F •tbit A,
Scope of Services.
B, ENGINEER shall submit statements for basic and
additional services rendered monthly, Such statements
shall be complete and detailed, COMMITTEE shall insure
prompt payments in response to ENGINEER'S statements.
" C, ENGINEER'S charges are on the basis of prompt payment
of statements rendered and continuous
progress of the
a work on the STUDY until submission of the report.
M D, The ENGINEER shall be compensated for services
indicated in Exhibit A, Scope of Servicea, on the basis
a~ of salary cost times a multiplier of 2.4, plus other
'I
;R PAGE 3
E
} yj+e•.(Nn]4W..a r. n>.Y Srn. .I .+W1,4. tlnr•p.. ....H...„C,:+A}:.'S.1 RPf ~Af. MN.dNlJ•wF'+.°'
,
}
,
direct expenses plus subcontractor costs with the total
fee not to exceed $250,000 without written
authorization of the County of Denton and the
COMMITTEE,
E. *Salary COW (illustrated in attached current Standard
Rate Schedule) used herein is defined as the cost of
salaries of managers, engineers, technicians, drafts-
men, stenographers, surveymen, clerks, laborers, etc.,
for time directly chargeable to the STUDY by ENGINEER'S
personnel, plus social security contributions, unem-
ployment, excise and payroll taxes, employment compen-
sation insurance, medical and other insurance benefits,
sick leave, vacation, holiday pay and contributions to
a pension or retirement plan. (Currently, salary cost
is eq,ial to 1.31 times direct salary payments. This
factor is adjusted annually).
i
F. Other direct expenses shall include printing and repro-
duction expense, communication expense, travel, trans-
portation and subsistence away from Dallas and other
' miscellaneous expense directly related to the work,
including costs of laboratory analysis, tests, and
other work required to be done by independent persons
or agents.
i
y G. Under no circumstances shall any statement for services
exceed the value of work performed at the time a
z statement is rendered.
H. it is specifically understood and agreed that the
r ENGINEER shall not be authorized or required to
`wd undertake any work pursuant to this Agreement which
aj would require additional payments by the COMMITTEE of
any charge, expense or reimbursement above the maximum
fee as stated without having first obtained written
authorization from the COMMITTEE.
~t 'r# I, Should the COMMITTEE fail to make payment to the
ENGINEER of the sum named in any partial or final
statement when payment is past due for more than
forty-five (45) days, then the COMMITTEE shall pay to
the ENGINEER, in addition to the sum shown as due by
such statement, interest thereon at the rate of 1
percent per month from the date due, as provided
herein, until fully paid, which shall fully liquidate
any injury to the ENGINEER arising from such delay in
payment.
Y J, Included within the Scope of Services for this STUDY is
' a budget of $12,500 for consultation with subcontracted
Hutchison, Price, Hoyle 6 Brooks, Inc. for legal and
First Southwest, Inc, for financial services,
y" x x
r
it PAGE 4
, ri
Vi. Cost Control
A. COMMITTEE'S budgetary requirements and considerations
in respect to the STUDY are set forth in Exhibit B.
B. Opinions of probable construction coat, financial
evaluations, feasibility studies, economic analyses of
alternate solutions and utilitarian considerations of
operations and maintenance costs prepared by ENGINEER
hereunder will be made on the basis of ENGINEER'S
experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER'S
best judgment as an experienced and qualified design
professional.
Vii. General Considerationa
A. Neither COMMITTEE nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or
transfer any rights under or interest. in (includingr
but without limitation, monies that may become due or
monies that are due) this Agreement without the written
consent of the other, except to the extent that any
assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law
or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by
law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any
written consent to an assignment, no assignment will
release or discharge the assignor from any duty or
responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained
in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing
such independent professional associates,
subcontractors and consultants as ENGINEER may deem
appropriate to assist in the performance of services
hereunder.
B. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give
any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone
d other than COMMITTEE and ENGINEER, and all duties and
p responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement
;j will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of COMMITTEE
and ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party.
' C. This Agreement (consisting of page 1 through page 18
inclusive) including Exhibits constitute the entire
Agreement between COMMITTEE and ENGINEER and supersede
( all prior written or oral understandings. This
Agreement and said Exhibits may only be amended,
supplemented, modified or cancelled by a duly executed
written instrument.
i D. In the event the ENGINEER'S Project Manager or key
3s I members of the project team are removed from this
ii STUDY, the COMMITTEE will hr.ve the right to interview
and approve or disapprove of replacements. If an
' i ENGINEER'S Project Manager satisfactory to the
COMMITTEE is not assigned, COMMITTEE shall have a right
'y to terminate this STUDY.
I r
fi ~ , .t f
TS
PAGE 5
wn4,:44 MWM1.t Y;~n".yl`fWfF=•aJiK~~
i
r
t
i
I ,
VIII, Indemnification
A. ENGINEER shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and
hold harmless the COMMITTEE from any and all damages,
lose or liability of any kind whatsoever, occasioned by
any error, omission or negligent act of ENGINEER, its
officers, agents, employees, invitees, and other
persons for whom it is legally liable, with regard to
the performance of this Agreement, and ENGINEER will,
at its cost and expense, defend and protect the
COMMITTEE against any and all such claims and demands
1 up to the amount of this contract.
ix. Mailing Addresses f
Ae All notices and communications under this Agreement to
be mailed or delivered to COMMITTEE shall be sent to
the address of the COMMITTEE'S PROJECT MANAGER with
copy to Lee walker, County Commissioner, as follows, i
unless and until ENGINEER is otherwise notified:
Robert E. Nelson, PEe, Project Manager
City of Denton Utility Department
215 E, McKinney Ste
Denton, Texas 76201
c Lee Walker, County Commissioner, Precinct 3
212 We Sycamore Ste
Denton, Texas 76201
-X
8. Notices and communications to be mailed or delivered to
ENGINEER shall be sent to the address of ENGINEER as
% follows, unless and until PROJECT MANAGER is otherwise
notified:
Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc, "
r .i 17811 Waterview Parkway, Suite 500
a 1 Dallas, Tx 75252
, , .a _ , ATTN: Thomas E Taylor, P e E,
Director of Municipal Services
C, Any notices and communications required to be given in
writing by one party to the other shall be considered
as having been given to the addressee on the date the
notice or communication is posted by the sending party,
t
5'
P
n, , v
!r
.K
PAGE 6
~,pi}, V;~wYM.i. v 4+•,,,,.. ~h!iwS'~yP.(q•➢1 wl'~4T.ilk
y
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have made and
executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written,
3 ENGINEER
ESPEYj HUSTON 5 ASSOCIATESO INC,
I
ATTEST:
i
t (Title BY
e Title
J f
DENTON COUNTY ON BEHALF OF
"r COMMITTEE
Attest:
(Title) 3Y,
Title
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
COUNTY ATT R
gyp t
. ~ a
%Y
? Y Ira l
i♦
1.
W
R LI
4
jy!
I
Y 1&r. 1 , P
rl 'Yj '•I q
PAGE 7
uMIA'IYM[iYNMaNMW,l~01°'rwVIM{{.Rlr~.^
I, r
iiM 1~ / r t Yi K
a
f
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
n ,,,,L_
Pur ose of Stud : The purpose of this STUDY is to evaluate and to
a a recommen at ons for providing water and wastewater service to
Denton County Communities and water and wastewater supply entities
needing wholesale service, now or in the future, in the service area E
of the regional water supply system operated by the City of Dallas }
(generally defined as all of Denton County with exception of the
area south and southwest of Denton Creek but subject to other minor
exclusions or inclusions). (map attached) See also City of Denton
potential water service area (map attached).
a'
Grant Assistance: The City of Denton, on behalf of Denton County
+ communities and water/wastewater supply entities have applied to the
Texas Water Development Board for grant assistance for this STUDY. !
COMMITTEE will prepare monitoring and status reports as required,
`s and ENGINEER will review such reports for technical accuracy and
completeness.
Communications: In order to keep participating entities advised of
progress, a Newsletter will be prepared by the ENGINEER and mailed
on a monthly basis to a mailing list not to exceed 200 addresses.
dd
1.0 Preliminary Assessment
1.1 ENGINEER 6 PROJECT MANAGER will identify data to be
collected and furnished by participating agencies.
p , 1.2 Review published reports furnished by the participating
agencies.
1.3 Conduct one on one interviews with each of the
following participating agencies.
Bartonville Water Supply Corp.
a Town of Bartonville, Texas
City of Carrollton, Texas
City of the Colony, Texas
Town of Copper Canyon, Texas
City of Corinth, Texas
City Of Dallas, Texas
City of Denton, TeXa3
County of Denton, Texas
Town of Flower Mound, Texas
City of Highland Village, Texas
Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority
City of Lewisville, Texas
Town of Little Elm, Texas
Town of Ponder, Texas
City of Sanger, Texas
b TSW Incorporated Water Company I
Other entities may agree to participate In costs of this STUDY at a
later date. In that event, additional interviews (not to exceed
r five unless authorized by the County of Jenton and the COMMITTEE)
will be required.
PAGE 8
i
i; ,
1.4 Review additional reports furnished by the participating
agencies for background information and for data
concerning population and demand projection. Such
reports include, but may not be limited to the following:
*Long Range Water Demand Forecasts, Dallas Water
tF. Utilities Service Area- CH2M Hill, Augt:st 1984
*Analysis of Water Service Area- Peat Merwich and
Mitchell, May 1980
*Report on Feasibility Study for Aubrey (Ray Roberts)
k.4. Lake- URS Company, 1977
*Report on Long Range Water Supply Study to Meet
_ Requirements to the Year 2050 for the City of Dallas,
Texas, URS Company, March 1975 i
*Water Supply Study for City of Denton- Freese s Nichols, f
June 1982
I
*Water supply study for City of Lewisville- Shimek,
Jacobs and Finklea, 1982 (revised 1985)
*Water Service Area Questionnaire, Dallas Water
Utilities, April 1985
r' *Conditions of Service for Treated Water Wholesale
Customers, City of Dallas, January 1985
NOTE: The above information is on file in the Planning
Division of Dallas Water Utilities in Room 4AS of Dallas
City Hall.
115 Identify other entitees in Denton County that have
responsibility for providing water or wastewater services.
g 1.6 Develop base map for project area.
E 1.7 As directed by the Project Manager, meet with other
identified entities (not to exceed two group meetings).
1.8 Determine, from information and data provided by each
entity, the water and wastewater services area of each
7 I
participating agency and/or the other identified entities
in Denton County.
1.9 Develop a draft work plan which shall include a proposed
)KV schedule for each phase of work.
1.10 Conduct work session with Steering committee.
1.11 Finalize the work plan.
J
1.12 Prepare and submit twenty-five (25) copies of Phase 1,0
report to the Project Manager.
,y t
k I
PAGE 9
ar t
' 1.13 Conduct review session of Phase 1.0 report with Steering
Committee.
2.0 Analysis. Defining the Dimensions of the Project:
4 2.1 Make an inventory of existing, committed, and planned
water and wastewater facilities and their capacities from
i information furnished by participating and
I non-participating agencies.
2.2 Meet with various agencies that may have information or t
who may be affected by the STUDY, including, but not
limited to the following agencies:
Texas State Highway Department
Railroads
Major Pipeline Companies
Major Gas and Electric Utilities I
U. S. Corps of Engineers
r Texas Water Commission
Water Development Board
North Central Texas Council of Governments
Trinity River Authority
North Texas Municipal Water District
City of Ft. Worth, Texas
North Texas Industrial Commission
2.3 Develop low, most probable, and high annual population
projections for the study area requirements for
increments of five (5) years through 2010. Use North
a Central Texas Council of Government's data as the base
} } population projection and supplement with input from the
respective Steering Committee entities and other
appropriate data.
' 2.4 Estimate future
per capita consumption of water and of
wastewater discharges.
2.5 '+h Develop low t most
probable, and high. projections for
future water demands for average and peak, drought and
normal conditions. Projections should be in increments of
five years.
2.6 Project low, most probable and high projections for
future wastewater treatment requirements for increments
of five (5) years through 2010.
4. j 2.7 Identify existing untreated water resources available to
serve the study areas determine yield expected to be j
j available to study areal consult with Dallas Water
Utilities.
j
2.8 Determine need for supplemental untreated water resources
' and identify potential sources which may be needed to
meet anticipated long-term requirements.
` PAGE 10
i
! a
y
i
i
I 2.9 Establish capability and willingness of existing major
entities within project area to meet projected water and
wastewater demands of the project area.
2.10 Meet one on one with each participating entity and review
STUDY results.
2.11 Conduct workshop with Steering Committee.
2,12 Identify alternative strategies, considering near term
and long term requirements, with emphasis on
institutional agencies for providing water and wastewater
services over the next twenty-five (25) years. Specific
alternatives to be evaluated include, but shall not be
A,•V limited to the following:
` 2.12.1 Untreated water service from Dallas to
other entities (either existing or proposed) which
could provide treated water service to customers in
the service area.
2.12.2 PartnersE;ip arrangement between cities to
construct water or wastewater treatment plants for
benefit of the contracting parties,
2.12.3 Creation of an entity or entities such as
utility districts to be sponsored and established
by the customers having a need for water or
{ wastewater service,
2.12.4 Enlargement of service area of existing
cities (Denton, Lewisville and others) which
already have water or wastewater treatment plants
in Denton county.
2.12,5 Service to be provided by an established a'
stir water or wastewater service entity which may or may
not presently provide service in the Denton County
s service area (Dallas, Trinity River Authority, etc).
r~ 2.13 prepare and submit twenty-five (25) copies of Phase 2.0
report to the Project Manager.
2,14 Conduct review session of Phase 2.0 Report with Steering
Committee.
3,0 Evaluation of Alternatives:
3.1 Evaluate feasibility of existing entities to expand their
service areas to meet all or a portion of the project
area.
Y
I
n
r y M
d' PAGE 11
C
.
j 3.2 To discuss Item 3.1 above, meet with the major agencies
including:
City of Denton €
City of Lewisville
ri City of Dallas
North Texas Municipal Water District f
Trinity River Authority 1
,
3.3 Evaluate previously identified alternatives and determine
ak "moat feasible' alternatives (5 to 15). Match water and
y~wastewater in workable combinations.
3.4 With aid of a computer model, evaluate in depth the "most
feasible" alternatives--documenting costs, advantages and
disadvantages.
` 3.5 Consult with legal and financial advisors concerning the
alternative institutional strategies.
3.6 Develop legal organizational structures with
recommendations for service contract concepts and
conditions of service required,
t 3.7 Make field reconnaissance of the area as needed to
determine probable location of proposed facilities for
water and sewer.
'i 3.8 Assess infrastructure requirements for "moat feasible"
alternatives and evaluate technical feasibility,
3.9 Conduct Workshop with steering Committee to evaluate
alternatives,
r w,i
k 3,10 Taking into account the results of the workshop and the
advice and comments of the Steering Committee, narrow the
alternatives to three general strategies (or service
plans) considering technical, legal, policy and financial
' constraints.
3.11 Conduct interviews with major entities that would be
affected by the alternative strategies to ensure
Mw;.,< conceptual agreement with their proposed roles in such
plans,
3.12 Prepare and submit twenty-five (25) copies of Phase 3.0
report to the Project Manager.
r t`* 3.13 Conda%!t review session of Phase 3.0 report with steering
Committee,
1.,
k PAGE 12
s '
o'
. 4.0 Development of Infrastructure Plans.
E 4.1 For each of the top three recommended institutional
alternatives, develop an infrastructure plan.
4.2 Prepare implementation schedules and preliminary cost
} estimates for recommended service alternatives.
4.3 Identify key political/policy/regulatory/legal steps for j
i implementation.
4.4 Provide recommendations for financial and legal
strategies for funding initial costs and annual operation i
k' and maintenance costs. Provide estimates of potential 1
Y{
customer rates under recommended alternatives.
s
4.5 Identify probable initial capital coat participation and
continuing contractual relationships between suppliers
and customers under recommended alternatives.
R 4.6 workshop with Steering Committee to review and fine-tune
the recommended alternative strategies.
4.7 Prepared and submit twenty-five (25) copies of phase 4.0
s
report to Project Manager.
IM
5.0 Reporting
5.1 Submit a draft of Final Report and Executive Summary to
1 Project Manager.
5,2 Steering Committee work session to review final report
and Executive Summary.
5.3 Prepare Final Report and separately bound Executive
Summary and submit two hundred (200) copies to Steering
i Committee,
5.4 Participate in presentation(s) of final recommendations 1
(not to exceed five (5) prosentationa).
" 5.5 Submit documentation report of working papers to Project
Manager,
y4 t' 5.6 Meet with Steering committee for closing remarks.
1
3 I
" 'v
r ^
• i
PAGE 13 ry
" , x:' ' i ~.,yaK+~i'Ik"rirtNr'.i,"f4kJ~4.k-Ak6bKd'~Llb'g11,
d^. s.
.L;
s
M.
I
PLANNING AREA
w
WAN
[i 011ol0 040
• 000Iol 04
"too
y 11111 • N 1•
0:4.64/4• 4/014: •N•///0•
0•61
4010100• • 4 1410
11•6011111160• 4001 4011 0
•11411440006
0 0 4 • ••~1• 1
f ` •1111••J •0111 •14110 10
.•...4• .
All
K 011014004
sloom of
•:•14.1.1 • 4 • u
•••1./ 0 • •
+r 11111:11• 0 ,
w 1.14.11• • • 10
••1111114• •I
••••11••11••1 011
. 640041044066 40 .♦r
°5 1.0••/•••u
• • 11114.14
•1.111.11111• •
14~iiii11/•144 •4iiii~
• 11.4141 •/11 fit 114
fir T 1111
gr~
WWM
t 1 0~r r1~ W
f ~ Q
11 L
•/olio (111111 or
loft
.L .
.
PACE l'
.I TM •t laaalas Area aaaalata W Gaalaa Oalialy axaladlad the area 440th 61
too '#*at of Oaafsa Greek* (Wales Aataiaa 01644101 lar Ike axaladad also
Deafen Gas load kaaw aaaayfad as a faa0aAalki111y by s(kew)
r
{
{
i
CITY OF DENTON = WATER SERVICE ARM
• . • • 4
,6 A ~ . fi't' '
r ..i
f ' t
• 1 ' , 1
's . ~ 1
ti . 1 !
• ~ i
{
rt, • ~j w 4' 4
1
DENTON REAViCE AREA
F
a>rn JS.
s
i+ EXHIBIT B
PARTICIPATING AGENCIES i ENTITIES
WITH ASSOCIATED FEES
Bartonville Water Supply Corp. $2,203
$2000 + (3,720 minus **1,693) x 100)
Bartonville, Texas, Town of $10080
$1000 + (805 x 100)
* Carrollton, Texas, City of $7,993 '
$5,000 + (29,934 x 100)
a ti Colony, Texas, City of $50715
$4000 + (17,150 x 100)
hi Copper Canyon, Texas, Town of $10089
$1000 + (888 x 100)
ra Corinth, Texas, City of $2,280
$2000 x (2800 x .100)
1 * Dallas, Texas, City of (maximum commitment) 40,000
* Denton, Texas, City of 11,310
y $5000 + (63,100 x .100)
^ * Denton, COUNTY OF (maximum commitment) $1000000
Flower Mound, Texas, Town of (maximum commitment) $5,000
$4000 + (11,800 x .10)
Highland Village, Texas, City of $30505
$3000 + (5050 x
Municipal Utility Authority $3,720
$3000 + (7200 x 100)
* Lewisville, Texas, City of $8,720
$5000 + (37,200 x .100)
Little Elm, Texas, Town of $11115
$1000 + (1150 x 100)
Ponder, Texas, Town of $1,032
s $1000 + (325 x 100)
r Sanger, Texas, Town of $2,385
$2000 + (3850 x 100)
TSW Incorporated Water Company $10081
s $1000 + (810 x 100)
TOTAL $19 f,14-7
Select Committee Member
I,
PARTICIPATION FORMULA:
1,000
Flat Fee: 1,000
1,000 - 5,000 21000
'r 51000 - 101000 3,000
e 10,000 - 25,000 40000
over 25,000 15,1000
Po ulalion~Fee:
in addition, each municipality or water supply entity
r, rv would pay a per capita fee of 100 per capita. j
Notes:
1) population numbers are January 11 1986 NCTCOO estimates.
2) Population for Bartonville Water Supply Corporation
excludes cities of Bartonville and Copper Canyon
y'{ ri}' F• since these cities are independent participants in the
study.
L~ 3) Population for Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority,
Bartonville Water supply Corporation and TSW Inc., Water
Company are estimated by methodology: Number of
Connections multiplied by 3 residents per connection
equals population. PAGE lb
S
~.d... ~...,...•<.xtil• lad.. ...wa,n'..d..M9"N4^i.y k4M'Y MiaF~IA':e~W'^`'wy'r~~J
I Y'CIIWING',~1FJ.Ily,'lbw
EXHIBIT C
ESPEY, HUSTON i ASSOCIATES, INC.
STANDARD RATE SCHEDULE
Personnel
Personnel cost is reimbursed based on a multiplier of 2.4
applied to salary cost. Salary cost for each employee is based
• on the employee's actual hourly wage plus benefits. Ranges of i
hourly salary cost by personnel classification are as follows:
`Jr Principal 36.00 to 70.00 I
Associate Staff 25.00 to 50.00
Senior Project Staff 20.00 to 45.00
i:. Project Staff 12.00 to 30.00
Technical Support 6.00 to 20.00
Clerical Support 16.00 to 16.00
a
Survey Field Crews
Survey crews are available at fixed hourly party rates.
T Three (3) man field Crew $75.00 per hour
Electronic Distance
Measuring Equipment No charge
~ There is no mileage charge for survey crew vehicles when the
job site is within fifty (50) miles of the office from which
' the survey crew originates.
Travel i Subsistence
;..'•Y" All travel and subsistence expenses are invoiced at actual
a ; cost. Coat of mileage on company-owned vehicles is computed at
r4, a rate of 280 per mile. Cost for company-owned four wheel '
'},l drive vehicles is computed at a rate of 28¢ per mile plus
$25.00 per day*
Purchased Services
t All purchased services are invoiced at actual cost. These
include but are not limited to reproduction, computer time,
long distance telephone, consultants, subcontract services, `
rented or leased equipment, and expendable supplies.
„
s PAGE 17
~I
J
ii
,
r
1. e
?},,14
Terms
Invoices are submitted monthly for all services rendered and
n are payable 'Net 45 days.' Late payments will incur a late
charge of one percent per month from the original date of
invoice.
Sfr 'r r n
yy
7
pyr
d} r~ti a 1
ti3
fr ri
y
t•~f\Z1y ~,t5 +
PAG8 18
<7
L
a v a
f
rfAA
t~ EXHIBIT D TO
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
~~Fj'hra Y
r, D Contract between the City of Denton
° and the Texas Water Development Board
for Grant Funds
,M
N_~ ~ ..Cs
p I
ad,f~ r y
ark
5 a°j 1s,r
Ny S
YYY"' p 1
ry
k eft J
x.
~nrwJlr.>'s•J-.d.ry:,+, r^ , -...^.+.w.,N[.pa¢~(t-~,DdKM3i rkik'Yi6~LMMMa"Arauen -
A 1
ty
4
ia~aL • i
ATTACHMENT III
i TWDB Contract No.
THE STATE OF TEXAS i CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TEL.S
MATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND
COUNTY OF TRAVIS i THE CITY OF DENTON, ET AL
This contract is wade and entered into between the Texas
Water Development Board, hereinafter termed the "Board", and the
City of Denton, Denton County Commissionerts Court, other Denton
County Municipalities, and the City of Dallas, hereinafter termed
"Denton" under which the following terms, conditions, and pro-
visions have been agreed upon, in consideration of the mutual
promises and covenants hereinafter stated,
WITNESSETH:
f
1.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY DENTON
t F ~
As a joint and a cooperative undertaking with the Board, to
be financed jointly as hereinafter specified, the City of Dentdn
will conduct a regional water supply and wastewater services
planning study for the City of Denton and the balance of Denton
County, excluding an area south and southwest of Denton Creek,
M
j Services and activities provided shall be In strict
' accordance with requirements of the Texas Water Code, Chapter
1Si associated rules of 31 Texas Administrative Code Chapter
' SS 5I Attachment A, the original grant application, whit is made
r' a permanent part of this contract-, and with the following
procedures and project descriptions:
1. It shall be the responsibility of the' City of Denton to
establish formal' and direct liaison with the entities listed in
k. lahlbit A, the directors of utility districts within the service
area that have notified Denton of their interest in the ppro ect,
appropriate officials of the Cities of Dallas and Lewi3V~Ile,
the North Texas Municipal Water District, the Trinity River
Authority, Ind community leaders in the nvoposed service area
for the purpose of coordinating the work :he planning study
and to acquire available data pertinent to the planning effort.
Planning shall be coordinated with all existing water supply,
r wastewater treatment, and flooding studies and activities for
the purpose of providing information for the project.
As the organizing entity, the City of Denton hasp thedresponsi-
bility to solicit comments from the general public as to the
content of the planning project.
2. The project will produce a feasibility study for a
regional water supply and wastewater services system for a
aw
x
d• ~ '
a
al
service area located in the Elm Fork watershed of the Trinity
River Basin. The feasibility study, which is described in more
detail in Siehible s, wills
' A. Develop a conservation plan for the service area
to emp asi:e more efficient use of water resources.
B. Determine present and potential water demands for
the years 1986 through 2010 for all cities,
V. unincorporated areas, and water service entities
in the planning area.
C. Determine present entities, systems for water and
wastewater service, and water resources available
in the planning area. j
D. Analyze most feasible water purveyor organisational
structures which may provide water and/or waste-
water services within the planning area. Specific
alternatives to be considered will includes
1. Expansion of
y. (with agreement fromlyentidotd ties) of rvCities areas
Denton and/or Lewisville.
2. Creation of new regional entities (i.e., water
districts).
3. Service from existing entitles which may or may
not presently provide service within the
planning area (i.e., Trinity River Authority).
B. Conduct interviews with established entities to
insure conceptual agreement with proposed roles in
regional service plans.
Y ! F. Proare preliminary cost estimates and implemen-
tation schedules for recommended service
alternatives.
0, Provide recommendations for financial and legal
strategies for funding Initial construction coats
and annual operation and maintenance costs.
Include estimates of potential customer rates
under recommended alternatives.
rf
H. Identify probable initial capital cost partici a•
p'
between nsuppliers and customirsuunder ereeommended
alternatives.
M1,
PAGE 2
d
.
i
z3, The study will review the relevant portions of the City
r- of Dallas' master plaanintt effort that address water supply,
' treatment and delivery to +he study area,
t•
4;. The project will include coordinatins the wafer supply
and wastewater system plans and policies with exitins an
policies of entities listed in *Aiylt A, the countyng
s ,plaand thed
state.
Il. {
PROJECT SCHEDULE AND REPORTS
r I
The tern of this contract shall be in and the Corporation
shall begin performing its obligations hereunder on
1987. The City of Denton shall complete the work program stated
in Article I, above, not later than August 31, 1987, unless such
date is extended as provided below, at which time the City of
Denton shall deliver a final draft report. After a thirty day
review period, the draft final report together with review
s' comments will be returned to the City of Denton. A final report
incorporating any required changes must be submitted to the
Board within sixty (60) days thereafter.
` Deadlines ma be
extended only in writing by the Board. Ten (10) copies of the
final report shall be delivered to the Board, Delivery of the
M' `a final report prior to November 30, 1987, shall constitute
completion of the term of the Contract.
Monthly progress work reports which summarise the work
completed through the period 'of the submitted State of Texas
` Purchase voucher will be submitted by the City of Denton to the
Board by the 20th of the month following the d re
the Voucher. The work report will containerthe cfollowing
J informationt
w
1. Task names and descriptions,
2. Total cost of the individual tasks, including TWDB and
k j city of Denton portions.
kola
3, Percetet of the tasks completed,
4, Dollar value of the percent of the tasks completed.
Sr. S, Total tasks completed, indicating the percent of and I
1 dollar value of the project completed as reflected in totals of
all State Vouchers submitted,
i
A coordination meeting will be held at the end of every
threa•month,period to discuss the status of the stud
v.: sentativos of municipalities In Denton County and the city rof
Dallas will be invited to rho meetings,
j
j
PAGE 3 i
E
k ,
5
1
x
c; The City of Denton will schedule the coordination meetings
so that a status report on the pro~ect can be written by the
City of Denton and submitted to t e Board according to the
following monthly mihedule during the active life of the
contract: March 1, 1987, and June 1 1987, An interim status
r report will not be required after tie draft final re art has
been submitted for review, The status reports shall be in
letter form and shall contain the following information:
E
u q 1. A brief statement of the overall progress made since the
. i last status report.
2. A brief description of any problems that have been
encountered during the previous reporting period that will
affect the study, delay the timely completion of any portion of
the contract, or will inhibit the completion of or cause a
change in any of the project products or objectives,
3. A description of actions the City of Denton or the
contractor plans to take to correct any problems described in
item 2 above or change any schedule, product, or objectives
stated in the contract.
If for any reason the City of Denton is unable to complete
its performance called for under the terms of this contract on
or before August 31, 1987, and is unable to deliver the final
report on or before November 30, 1987, the City of Denton and
tit the Board hereby agree to consider negotiatin a new contract
in writing ten
U eriod. The Board must, however, be notiEiel
(10) working days prior to the date for completion of the work
r program or thirty t3O) days prior to the date for submittal of
the final report that the City of Denton will be requesting
renegotiation.
Y A
i'. , 1 I I
CONDENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT
x The Board, for and in consideration of the obligations and
responsibilities undertaken by the City of Denton, hereby agrees
to compensa?'e and reimburse the City of Denton, in a total
amount not to exceed S12S,000, upon the submission of invoices
~t and purchase vouchers representing costs incurred by the City of
Denton pursuant to performance of this Contract. The City of
z Denton will contribute $125,000, representing fifty (SO) percent
of the total project cost, in the form of cash;
A. Reimbursement to the City of Denton shall be made in
accordance with the following budget, with the Board ;
contributing fifty (SO) percent of the total project cost in
the form of cash,
r
PAGE 4
4 'I I 'I
t.,
t
BUDGET
Contract RStudy aforathe City lof Denton
A. Salaries and
, wages
S 51,3
BFringe
` C. Travel 13,738
D. Expendable Supplies 1100
r ! 8. Contract Services* 68;750
F. Technical/Computer Services 21200
G. Communications 11100
H. Reproduction 91350
r 1. Overhead 78 138
J. Profit 21,561
TOTAL $2500000
1 Subcontracts
1
r Monthly invoices or vouchers supplied by the Board for work i
performed shall be submitted for reimbursement. Said invoices
and vouchers shall be supported by sufficient detail to sub.
° stantiate billing by the City of Denton said detail to include
` the following:
1. For direct expenses incurred by the City of Denton
for outside consulting service--copies of invoices to
' the City of Denton showing the tasks that were per- j
formed; the percent and cost of each task completed;
a total cost figure for each direct expense category
including labor, overhead, travel, communication and
posts e, technical and computer services, expendable
supplies, printing and reproduction; and the total
y dollar amount due to the consultant.
.If
2. For travel and subsistence expenses, including such
expenses for sub•conrractors••names, date, work
location, time period at work location, itemization
or subsistence expenses of each employee, limited
however, to travel expense authorized for state
employees by House Bill 20, as amended, Acts of the
i. 69th Legislature, As ular Session, 19B5 (General
Appropriation Act); and
' S. Other transportation costs--copies of invoices
covering tickers for transportation or, if not
available, names, dares, and points of travel of
individual; and
PAGE 5
r
m'ty
+°'„r`aa.5'-b'is!rYlf.Y9A'++Yn,U'4~.t:lfri.pl'^
13 ,
a_
r \
4. All other reimbursable expenses.-Invoices or
purchase vouchers showing reason for expense with
' receipts to evidence the amount incurred,
"T B. The Board shall reimburse the City of Denton only upon
invoice and purchase voucher; provided, however, the Board shall
only Pat up to ninety (901) percent of each Invoice pending the
city o£ Denton 's performance, completion of the report, and
acceptance and approval of said report by the Board. At the
time of said performance, completion, and approval of the repot
by the Board, the Board shall pay the remaining ten (101r)
kt percent to the City of Denton,
` IV.
j
r PUBLICATION AND SUBCONTRACTING I
t The Board shall have unlimited rights to technical or other
data resulting directly from the performance of services to the
s~ Board under this contract.
It is agreed that the water supply
loped by the City of Denton pursnt to nthis materials shill k
become the joint property of the City of Denton and the Board in
which the Board retains the right to establish copyrights, Any
` water suppply pplanning materials subject to a Board copyright and
produced by ti►e City of Denton or Board pursuant to this contract
I may be j
Y printed by the City of Denton or Board at their own cost '
and distributed by either at their discretion within the State
of Texas. The City of Denton may otherwise utility such
,Ar F material provided under this contract as it deems necessary and
appropriate, including the right to publish and distribute the
mater als or any parts thereof under its own name within the
State of Texas, provided that any Board copyright is appropri-
ately noted on the printed materials,
J%
The City of Denton agrees to acknowledge the Board in any
news releases or other publications relating to the work per-
a,n formed under this Contract.
No work herein called for by the City of Denton shall be
subcontract Ed or assigned without prior written approval of the
z, Executive Administrator of the Board for such subcontract,
including a detailed budget estimate with specific cost details
for each Item of the work to be performed by the subcontractor
and for each category of reimbursable expenses,
u
AMENDMENT, TERMINATION, AND STOP ORDERS
s~ This contract may be altered or amended only by mutual
written consent and may be terminated by -the Board at any time
cF
r PAGE 6
r
. _
ow
y
9
H
A
by written notice to the City of Denton. Upon receipt of such
notice, the City of Denton shall, unless the notice directs
otherwise, immediately discontinue all work In connection with
the performance of this Contract and shill proceed to cancel
promptly all existing orders insofar as such orders are
i; chargeable to this Contract. The City of Denton shall submit a
statement showing in detail the work performed under this
Contract to the ate of termination. The board shall then pay
the City of Denton promptly that proportion of the prescribed
fee which applied to the work actually
't. Contract, less all payments that have beenf pr performed under this
:a ! Thereupon, copies of all completed work accomplished unldermthis
} Contract shall be delivered to the Board.
I
The Board may issue a Stop Work Order to the City of Denton
at any time. Upon receipt of such order, the City of Denton is
to discontinue all work under this Contract and cancel all
orders pursuant to the Contract, unless the order directs
otherwise. If the Board does not issue a Restart Order within
60 days after receipt by the City of Denton of the
Stop
Order, the City of Denton shall regard this Contract terminatWork
ted
ed
in accordance with the foregoing provisions.
s VI.
NO DEBT AGAINST THE STATE
This Contract and Agreement shall not be construed as
creating any debt by or on behalf of the State of Texas and for
1 the Texas Water Dev g
state of Texas are subjecthto Bthe ravailabilityoofifunds,~s of the
s VII,
t LICENSES, PERMITS, AND INSURANCE
For the purpose of this Contract, the City of Denton will be
considered an independent contractor and therefore solely respon-
sible for liability resulting from negligent acts or omissions,
Tne City of Denton shall obtain all necessary insurance in the
Judgment of the City of Denton, to protect itself, the Board,
and empployeas and officials of the Board from liability arising
out of the'Contract. The City of Denton shall indemnify and
hold the Board and the State of Texas harmless, to the extend
that the City of Denton may do so in accordance with the State }
Law, from any and all losses, damages, liability, or claims
' therefore, on account of
damage of any nature whatsoevern auseduby, then i,tyoof pDonton$
arising out of the activities under this Contract.
The City of Denton shall be solely and entirely responsible
for procuring all appropriate licenses and
required by any competent authority for t,heeCiity of iDenton to
xk, perform the subject work,
j PAGE 7
14
p
Ir- '
1
53
I
nI I I
r VIII.
SEVERANCE PROVISION
Should any one or more f
provisions of this Contract be held '
to be null, void, voidable, or for any reason whatsoever, of no
force and effect, such provislon(s) shall be construed as E
severable from the remainder of this Contract and shall not
affect the validity of all other provisions of this Contract
f which shall remain of full force and effect.
i
In WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto cause this Contract k
' and Agreement to be duly executed in triplicate this day
of 1987.
I
TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD !
~l
BY:
l
CHARLES , NkMIR
EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF DENTON, ET AL j
3
' BY:
RAY STEPHENS$ MAYOR
I
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE . My SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTONI, TEXAS
a
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
+ DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
.,i BYi 1
ba Ji ' ,s i
PAGE 8
1, •I
•J
r04
' _ +rravrNe92[AdMM.k;~+a..lbgi~'"#':..'Nlij..
y
i
.0
r
PLANNING AREA
r 1~1
~ rtlw rr rte.. I
i
111111 111 -
• 1111111 111/11~
tl1 iiiSl~• ~~1'11
.61 N 66116 1/111111
C,, 11111• 11• •61 1111111•.
,•1.11 1116• •111111111
111111111 ♦ 116661 111111111
1111111111 • 1.111 / 11111
061/ 1 '
1U 11.11611116 1111 :*At
i, ••11611/111111 6 6 161./•.y 6.666 11111• 6,.
61.1,•16 1.11 61 1611• 111
11111111 11 4 6 6161•
.i small iiiiiiiii i 6 • 6ii .II~j ~IA•
. 11161111. 6 6/ / ,1 p
1116111.6 6•• • •1•
A+' 111661.1 ♦ • 66 111
d 6161.11111 66• /6
~y( 1116111.11666 611
61111,1N1• of
1.661
11116/6/10•
1.11111111
- j 1111111166111 6
4r 111;;1.11111// 161111
MWO641 1111/
:67T/a 1 11 614 • 111116
' 1111 66\1111111 IIUI 111111
66661 1111
lE/ IAA 111111/1
logo t 0
y/ ir1 f
11~ ~N 111//11
' T or
1n.
savings
a+ 2 6>r+ M
yy" T 7
..,,111 ,111111 + or 1111!1
r/r
IIf1 61/1111 11111 f
r
PACE
The +I►1a4414s Area' 10104Nafs of 01041 M 101004ly 41114104114/ the area south and
weal of 11104tsa creek, (walfr darvide p1a4M4r far the exaludod soft
k 4 fMlsa fla/ has bsa~ 844401441 as a radoonsIY1llly by others.)
1 i
1
r
a r
i
l
i
CITY OF DENTON -WATER SERVICE AREA
y w•
,
~ ' ~ - rr 1 r ~ ♦ T
•.«t • R r Y1• 1
7M• . /
ar.r •
w r
• 1 , • • , 1 'r'l • tNfL~' • , Y~or w 1
"MON DENTON 81MVI01 AREA
aeca l5'
14
1 }
i
f~
t.
• 1
EXHIBITS
t ; CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT
I.W BOARD AND THE CITY OF DENTON, ET AL
A ,
,~Y t
y 1. }i
s ~Pt
List of Participating Agencies
Exhibit A
Entities with Associated Fees t
s
Exhibit B Contract between Denton County I
and Espey, Huston and Associates.
!
I
1.
• '4
y? e.r
Z tc . ,
N 1
ti: r
V.. I
r
r
t;
i *,fl0ayy4y4 .ww s'".
r
r'di
a
i
i
EXCERPT f
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
i. Meeting of January 14, 1987
sln a:IIAN Ar rNC A 1NqA aaxroN c0aNT7
fill
R'P4; i
Nelson efealainod that this was the companion doeuxont to
itsffi #l. Nelson noted that final review of this contract
and the engineering services agreement is not completed by
county Legal counsel and the city Attorney as of the
' present time,
Coolies coved approval of the subject contract
ndng
`r additional cosimints by the City Attorney. Boyd sec
ond,
All ayes, no nays, ration carried unanimously@
Y
q .
+4
Y,
A~
qti,
j r~C\1.F r.
Lad
f
{
{ 11111
X f 3
Y: I
3.
'iYt t
r ~ Rr ~
y ~ rl
I
X V
~1I
r^
e x'
s
i
Yg r 'Y
r t
' a X
t :1
F 'y L
s
t
r
IIIIIIIIII Jill
y lz
144 1
• •,lrrrww+.,............ ...,...............».,...,..,.w..... ~w•~YWSNyyyYe.'....... .,__...,,r.,.yw~Vb.
6
31 r
AAL
DATE: February 3, 1986
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
i
t TO:
r MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
k ~
r• FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
f SUBJECT; CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RATES
FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC SERVICE BY THE CITY TO ITS
CUSTOMERS
RECOMMENDATION:
1K
t The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of
January 14, 1987 recommended approval of the electric
rate revisions submitted by Management Applications
Consulting,
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
t -
Management Applications Consulting, Inc. (MAC was
rr retained by the City to conduct a comprehensive rate
study of the Electric rates. The recommendation is:
1, A 4,91 decrease in Electric rates a
(a) 2,51 average decrease to residential
' (b) 61 average decrease to business (more de-
„ crease to small businesses)
' (c) 5,31 to 7.81 average decrease to industries
At (d) 7,71 decrease to local government (schools,
r etc,)
' (e) 5,91 decrease to churches
s~
2. The electric rate reduction includes slightly lower
M demand charges and base energy rates. The energy
s cost adjustment (ECA) will be reduced from 2,150/
KWH t0 2.00:f/KWH,
` Small commercial customers will receive rate
relief with elimination of the demand charge for
" the first 5 XW of demand,
4
A time of use rate will be available for General
~ Service customers and Religious Worship customers f
wherein the rate for peak hours would be 10.250/
KWN plus Energy Cost Adjustment (ECA) and off peak
I
' f
I. j
H.
r ~
r
C.
,t, .r ns~yia e.an!'S yYF;ri FlrtrW's.raa sy.f.n me+.. ,
r
Ii
Page 2
hours rate would be 4.51/KwH plus ECA. Off peak
hours are generally any time before 12 noon and
E after 8 p.m. weekdays and all hours on weekends
and holidays. There would be no demand charge
with this rate.
The Executive Summary plus selected exhibits of pro-
posed new water rates, water bill comparisons,
proposed new electric rates and selected electric,
1 water, and wastewater financial pro forma's are
included with this Council agenda item. A complete
set of rate study work papers are available in the
Utility Administration office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To accomplish this rate reduction the electric depart-
meet will have to reduce budgeted expenditure by
$1,2000000. Approximately 500,000 will be from fuel
and purchase power related expenditures. $700,000
will have to be from cuts in operations and
maintenance.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
1
citizens of n
Utilities, City of Denton General Government. Municipal
"r
r*. Respectfully submitted:
:
Lloyd Harrell
City Manager '
lI^-r+,. . E. Nelson... E
Director of Utilities
Aggrove
/`yam
t ,
y R. E. Nelson
Director Utilities
Attachment 1: Rate study Executive Summary
x 2: Pro
Exhibition of Revenue Requirements
3. Exh bit V V A-2, B-5, CRate urrent vs. Proposed Rates
5: Minutes PUB, December 16, 1987
1-01
0286n
k
1
r
1679L
j
i
r NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING NEW RATE SCHEDULES FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICES)
PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, j
" l THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
R I ;
E SECTION 1.
4 That the Schedule of Rates for electrical services as provided for in i
Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances* are hereby established as follows: I
,Y
ARTICLE I.
ELECTRIC RATE SCHEDULES
PAGE ~
' R1 Residential Service Rate 2
02 Residential Service Rate 4
r LP Large Primary Commercial i Industrial
Lighting and Power Service Rates 6 E
GP General Service Primary B
ifs GS General Service Commercial 10
RW Religious Worship 12
f + 2 ! G1 Local Government Lighting 6 Power Service Rate
(City* County# Independent School District) 14
TR Residential Time of Use Rate 16
+ TP Primary Time of Use Rate is
To General Service Time of Use Rate 20
xt,h. 02 Street Lighting 22
03 Traffic Signal Lighting 23 ;
' SDI Dusk-to-Dawn Lighting (Security Light) 24
T1 Temporary Service Schedule 26
P1 Interruptible Primary Service 28
At Athletic Field 30
r
ICA Energy Cost Adjustment 32
UPS Uninterruptible Power Supply 33
tk '
r
~ r
SCHEDULE R-1
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE
E APPLICATION
i
Applicable to all electric service used for residential pur-
i poses in a single family dwelling or an individually metered
i ipartmentt supplied at one point of delivery and measured through
one meter where usage is not in excess of 700 KWR per 30-day month i
during the billing months MAY through OCTOBER.
i if usage in any such
` month exceeds 700 me billG,g will be rendered that month under
Rate Schedule R-2 and thereafter for a period extending through the
12 billing months of the next year ending with the October billing.
Annually, in November, the customer may again qualify for the R-1 k
rate provided that consumption has not exceeded 700 KWH per 30-day
month during the previous six summer months.
Where individual dwelling units are being served through the
4 same meter as of the effective date of this rate schedule and the
t„ KWH in the billing months of MAY through OCTOBER exceed 700 Kwo ;
times the number of dwelling units, the billing for that month and
" thereafter will be rendered under Rate Schedule R-2. j
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Customer Facility Charge 45.50/30 days
r~ l
' (2) Energy Charge 4.650/KWR
(3) Energy Cost Adjustment Schedule ECA
S
MINIMUM BILLING
e" 05.50/30 days
t TYPE OF SERVICE
" The City will supply single-phase service at any standard
voltages available from the City's distribution system through one
~L. standard transformation.
rt PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance..
{ t.
r { PAGE 2/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE E
ra.m,.a<.,..•..._... ka.~• . - Nom;
v .4!y. vat
M,
i
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
i
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
' Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually. i
Formulas
Actual des in reading period x customer charge `
' E 30
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
~t
A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
accordance with Schedule E.C.A.
t
r4 ~ ~
t;-
! I
v
t N
r "
ryl - 7
r 1 •
a r
f yq r ~ ~ '
t
s
4 ,1
}I
+f'Inr j
1-4
1 i
T hex}
A f ,
d` d ~ 7
l r
PAGE VELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
a~1+i=pY .m•::B w-r>... :.a... ,.«x64#k=:4.FV,n xa a,.'.I:rre%,.v'v b+..~hr''~°wA1+adMA'•'v~
r ,
r~
~ a.
•r w
.
I
s
t
SCHEDULE R-2
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE
a I
I APPLICAPION
7 Applicable to any custo' for all electric service used for i
residential purposes in a, dividual private dwelling or an
individually metered apartmenr, supplied at one point of delivery
and measured through one meter. Also applicable to any customer
1a heating with electric energy, resistance or heat pump. Ij
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to 1
r:
temporaryt standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction
<< with applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE WINTER SUMMER
Billing months of Billing months of
J Nov. through April May through Oct.
k" 11) Customer Facility Charge
k Single Phase 6.50/30 days 6.50/30 days
Three Phase 111.00/30 days 111.00/30 days
(2) Energy Charge
11 r l? First 11000 KITH 5.150KNH
All additional KNH 1065E/KWH
First 31000 KWH 5.65y~/KWg
a`a All additional KWH 6.14~L/KNH
(3) Energy Cost Adjustment Schedule ECA Schedule ECA t
MINIMUM BILLING
single Phase 6.50/30 days 6.50/30 days j
Three Phase 11.00/30 days 11.00/30 days 3
TYPE OF SERVICE
The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase
~ . service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty 160) cycles.
and at any standard voltsgea available from the City's distribution
r.'
system through one standard transformation, Where service of the
type desired by the customer is not already available at the point
of service, special contract arrangements between: the City and the
customer may be required prior to its being furnished.
a r.
w
J. yr
'r
6>
PAGE 1/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
y
t
s
t ' 1 , J M1 j 4f'
hobo
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered# and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
: All services which require special facilities in order to meet
i4 customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the j
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS ;i
i
a
! (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 ,
billings annually.
Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 l ,
ib) Billing for the energy charge shall be based on 30 days kk
per month to determine the RwE consumption to be charged to each
rate block. I
Y Formula:
Actual days in reading period x K" in rate block x Rate per
`'r 1
KwS 30 in rate
J. I
a • block I
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT 1 .i
A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
wsr accordance with Schedule S.C.A.
1
psi > ~:,:R
-41
s
~4 1
~ ~1 t
i
t~
,h 4
y
PAGE VELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
re
,IF x.
i
1
.a L•0. -c9 j
A,
SCHEDULE LP
j
LARGE PRIMARY
{ i
} APPLICATION
f. I
LP Rate applicable to any customer having a minimum demand of
750 xW for all electric service supplied at one point of delivery
and measured through one meter, with customer providing all
facilities necessary to receive primary voltage service.
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to
temporary, standby or supplementary service except in conjunction
ti with applicable rider.
%
NET MONTHLY RATE
Ili Customer Facility Charge #45.00 per 30 days
R
(2) Demand charge #5.50 per KW of demand
(3) Energy charge 2095E/KNH for all MIS
(4) Energy Cost Adjustment Schedule ECA
14
MINIMUM BILLING
An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but
i not less than seventy percent (70%) of the maximum monthly demand
1 charge for any month during the preceding months of Mey through
October plus #45.00 per 3D day Billing.
r TYPE OF SERVICE
i LP rate primary voltage service (transformation equipment
awned by customer) is available to any customer who has a minimum
demand of 750 KW#* Primary service is rendered at one point on the
customer's promises at a nominal voltage of 130200 volts
l~
Customers on primary service prior to the effective date of
this ordinance are not required to meet the 750 Kx requirement.
k~° # The primary voltage service customer shall own, operate, and
maintain all facilities necessary to receive three phase primary
voltage service and all transformation facilities required for
conversion to
J
J t
vF . i GIs
PACE b/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
a gam...».,..
`1 11
iy r. t try.. l..
tai h.
.r
i
utilization voltage. The City shall own, operate and maintain all
metering facilities, either at primary or secondary voltage, at the
City's option. Where the City elects to meter at secondary voltage,
two percent shall be added to the demand charge, the energy charge
u, and the energy cost adjustment charge to account for transformer
r
' losses.
A PAYMENT
4
Y ~ f
I Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid E
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
G DETERMINATION OF DEMAND #
The demand shall be the KW supplied during the 15-minute
r period of maximum use during the current month as determined by
city's demand meter, but not less than 701 of the maximum monthly KW
similarly determined during the previous billing months of MAY
K through OCTOBER in the 12 months ending with the current month.
n
POWER FACTOR
" The City reserves the right to mak
1- e teats to determine
s eligibility for the LP
rate and to determine the power factor of
the customer's installation served during periods of maximum demand
or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly'
bilking period. If the power factor is below ninety percent, the
;
demand for billing purposes will be determined by multiplying the
uncorrected KW billing demand by 901 and dividing by the determined
power factor.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
a ,r
All services which require special facilities in order to meet i j
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
h PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
A
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
{ billings annually. Formulas
i ` Actual days in reading period x customer charge
35
(b) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per
month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods,
Formulas
'r Actual days in reading period x KW demand x Rate
30 days
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
p4. A charge per KWg of energy taken for fuel coat calculated in
accordance with Schedule E.C,A.
a~
PAGE 7/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
t
l
7
i'15
1
q 5,
l
Y
5
SCHEDULE GP
GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY
j APPLICATION
i'
GP Rate applicable to any customer having a minimum demand of
750 HW for electric service supplied at one point of delivery and
measured through one meter, with the City providing and owning all
facilities and transformation equipment necessary to receive primary
voltage service.
4
s Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tempo- 1
r!° rary, standby or supplementary service, except in conjunction with
5 I applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) facility charge 45.00/30 days
(2) Demand Charge #5.75/KW
(3) Energy Charge 3.10/KWE i
s (4) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA
j IIII
MINIMUM BILLING I
F ~ III
a An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but
not leas than seventy percent (701) of the maximum monthly demand
;u charge for any month during the preceding months of May through
I
4 October, inclusivs, plus 45.00 per 30 day billing. `
,Y ,
TYPE OF SERVICE
For GP primary voltage service, the City will supply three-
r
shoe service.. at sixty (60) cycles and at any standard voltages
available from the City's distribution system. To be eligible for
GP servics$ customers must have a minimum demand of 750 R4t.e where
required facilities are not already available at the point of
! service, special contractual arrangements between the City and the
customer will be required prior to its being furnished,
r~ Customers on primary service prior to the effective data of
this ordinance are not required to mead the 750 kw requirement.
„ PAYMENT
h
Bills are due when rendered, and become pest due if not paid
within 15 days from date of issuance.
y
PAGE E/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE I
S
! 1
i'
t
DETERMINATION OF DEMAND
The demand shall be the KW supplied during the 15-minute
i period of maximum use during the current month as determined by
City's demand meter, but not leas than 701 of the maximum monthly KW
similarly determined during the previous billing months of MAY
through OCTOBER In the 12 months ending with the current month.
+ POWER FACTOR
4 I
The City reserves the right to make teats to determine the
power factor of the customer's installation served during periods of
maximum demand or by measurement of the average
a' monthly billing power factor for the I
Y g period. If the power factor to below ninety percento
the demand for billing purposes will be determined by multiplying
W the uncorrected XW billing demand by 901 and dividing by the
determined
b power factor.
b p' SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
the customer's service requirements shall be
d, special facilities rider. provided subject to
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
s
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually. Formulas
f' Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30
(b) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per
j month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods.
r :s Formulas
Actual days in reading period x KW demand x Rate
fy~
30 days ~ .
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
A charge per XWN of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
accordance with Schedule E.C.A.
f
PAGE 9/FLECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
4
f rv`I
J
Z ul
r SCHEDULE GS
GENERAL SERVICE
APPLICATION
Applicable to any commercial and industrial users for all !
{ electric service supplied at one point of delivery and measured
through one meter.
h Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to
temporary, standby or supplementary service except in conjunction
with applicable rider.
'd !
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Customer Facility Charge f
Single Phase 10.00 per 30 days
Three Phase 15.00 per 30 days
' (2) Demand charge $5.75 per KW (first 5 Rw not billed)
i (3) Energy Charge
First 700 M 7.500/KWH `I
All KWH over 700 3.500/RN9
!
(1) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule
mINImum BILLING J}
An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but
t ; nct lose than seventy percent (701) of the maximum monthly demand
charge for any month during the preceding months of May through
October plus 410/ month for single phase or less than $15/month for
three phases per 30 day billing. f
TYPE OF SERVICE
' Secondary service available to commercial and industrial
1„..' customers.
The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase
service it available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles °
and at any standard voltages available from the City's distribution
system through one standard transformation, Where service of the a
type desired by the customer is not already available at the point
of service, special contract arrangements between the City and the
customer may be required prior to its being furnished.
~ ;4 L
r' J PAGE 10/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE a
r. ,
fi r, b!~ •r r%1fi.~;tgi as +dirrl~M"i.s
e
c
5y 1
I
J PAYMENT
f
f Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance .
f
DETERMINATION OF DEMAND
c. ,
The demand shall be the KW supplied during the 15-minute
period of maximum use during the current month ae determined by
City's demand meter, but not less than 700 of the maximum monthly KW
similarly determined during the previous billing months of MAY
r through OCTOBER in the 11 months ending with the current month. The
y KW demand used for billing shall be adjusted by subtracting 5 KW.
The adjusted KW demand will subsequently be used for billing for the E
demand portion of the utility bill. In no case, shall billed demand
be less than 0 KW.
In cases where the connected load is constant, the City may,
at it's option# estimate the KW demand. For neon signs, one volt
ampere shall be considered the equivalent of 3/e watt.
POWER FACTOR
' The City reserves the right to make tests to determine the
power factor of the customer's installation served during periods of
maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the
monthly billing period. If the power factor is below ninety percent,
the demand for billing purposes will be determined by multiplying
the uncorrected KW billing demand by 909 and dividing by the
determined power factor. ,
fr
SPECUID FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
ti r
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
` (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually. Formulas
' Actual days in reading period x customer charge jj
30 i
(b) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per
month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods.
Formulas
' Actual days in reading period x adjusted KW demand x Rate
30 days
ENERGY COST. ADJUSTMENT
' A charge per JWn of energy taken for fuel coat calculated in
` accordance with Schedule E,C.A.
ti
} PAGE ll/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
.Ysyi
%
SCHEDULE RW
I
RELIGIOUS WORSHIP
r, I
APPLICATION
primarily for religious wor-
Applicable to any facility used
ship, education and meeting Vernon's Annotated Texas Statutes
M A.T.C,) guidelines for property tax exemption as a religious
' organization. Not available for resale.
NET MONTHLY BILLING
(1) Facility Charge
Single Phase 10.00/30 days j
Three Phase 15.00/30 days
(2) Energy Charge
First 700 RWH 7.50!/RWH
C ' All over 700 xWH 3.250/XWH f
p (3) Demand Charge # 3.75/KW (first 5 SW not billed)
(1) Energy Coat Adjustment Current ECA Schedule ~
MINIMUM BILLING
An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but }
not less than fifty percent (501) of the maximum monthly demand
charge for an month during the preceding months of May through
October plus10/ month for single phase service or #15/month for
three phase service, per 30 day billing.
TYPE OF SERVICE
r.r ie
The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase
service if available at the point of delivery} at sixty (60) cycles
and at. any standard voltages available from the city's distribution
system through one standard transformation, Where service of the
` type desired by the customer is not already available at the point
of service, special contract arrangements between the city and the
h customer may be required prior to Its being furnished,
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance
Y r
reel, +
t x
~o
✓ PAGE I2/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
~ r awetR. 14'aa ✓n: ~aa-µ ..~ah.,.:rF aP3.F~'N.My~L ~1':
~n
n .
F
DETERMINATION OF DEMAND
The demand shall be the XW supplied during the 15-minute
-1 period of maximum use during the current month as determined by
F City's demand meter, but not less than 701 of the maximum monthly Kw
' i simila_ly determined during the previous billing months of MAY
through OCTOBER in the 12 months ending with the current month, The
KW demand used for billing shall be adjusted by subtracting 5 Kw,
+5... The adjusted Kw demand will subsequently be used for billing for the
demand portion of the utility bill. In no case, shall billed demand
be less than 0 Kw.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
" x^ special facilities rider,
t
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
ter+, Billing for consumption and demand shall be calculated on a
30-day basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods.
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
Formulas I
' Actual days in reading period x customer charge
` 30
(b) willing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per
} month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods,
' Formulas
` Actual days In reading period x KW demand x Rate
s e ' f:i+ 30 days
f "
4 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
t Y' A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
f ;w+ accordance with Schedule E.C,As,
S } T
Y I~ ~ k i
r
t ,j. Y f, eL ,,J
41
'
lc lit.YI
tVS p Y?
. ~ 'til 1 f ° 'ti1 l
PAOE 13/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
~ e YM~. .wwynawd'3JayW'1iWYie~i,.,..:w...,... _ +.v~µya}. '
,Y
r
. r n4 I
0.Y Y } _
SCHEDULE G-1
r i
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
APPLICATION E
Applicable to any local City, County Of School Districts for
all electric service supplied at one point of delivery and measured
through one meter.
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to
r temporary, standby or supplementary service except in conjunction
HY with applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
r ° (1) Customer Charge
Single Phase 10.00 per 30 days
d Three Phase 15.00 per 30 days
(2) Demand Char
` 9a #1.50 per KW of demand
~I k
M1 (3) Energy charge 3.250 per KWH for all KWH
r ,
(1) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule
MINIMUM BILLING
l An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but
not less than fifty percent (501) of the maximum monthly demand
n charge for any month during the preceding months of May through
October plus 10.00/ month for single phase service or lest than I
#15.00/month for three phase service, per 30 day billing period.
TYPE OF SERVICE
The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase
service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles
and at any standard voltages available from the city's distribution
system through one standard transformation. Where service of the
type desired by the customer is not already available at the
point
of service, spacial contract arrangements between the City and the
" customer may be required prior to its being furniabed.
PAYMENT
Bill are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
"Yy within 15 calendar days from date of issuance ,
Ir~A
r 5ir4+r'
PACE !//ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
11 .e~46M. .l1,Y'r'+4cra.w..• - . .+a.ro..:R"MfV
r r `ir 1 ~ {b'c f03iYdR'~FSM"rwrm-..•..._ . . . k.a i. ~
~ ~ ."M1.wtalKD6iY,'{kONrrMyAF}~p~y*"'° ~ 6'
1 j
t Y'
1
r1
r
4
1 DETERMINATION OF DEMAND
The demand shall be the KW supplied during the 15-minute pert
Of maximum use during the current month as determined by City's
demand met c,d
meter.
POWER FACTOR
The City reserves the right to make tests to determine the
power factor of the customer's installation served during periods of
maximum demand or by measurement of the average
power monthly billing period. If the power factor Is below ninety r for the
the demand for billing pur Y percent,
the uncorrected l bil ling id l by determined by multiplying
determined power factor. g m Y A0l and dividing by the
SPECIAL FACILITIES
" All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customers service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY HILLS
" r .
r
(a) billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
16
" Formula:
!
Actual dava In read inclod x customer charge
30
r { 7, ~ 4
(b) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per
rN month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods.
Formula:
Actual days in readlna ~tlod
x KW demand
? 30 days x Rate
rc y* ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
A charge
per KWE of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
accordance with Schedule E.Q.A.
,I
r;''t+
r
r c {
r,
11 '
` s3 " 5 J .pANarmW.aw~>„.4 . W PAGE 15/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
~ rrnf, `
lY
way<~ y^y"L6 LI'' _ i .r
~3 4 k ` r
4
r,
ACHEDULE TR
I•r
REST{ IAL TIME OF USE RATES
APPLICATION
{ Applicable to any customer for all electric service used for
residential purposes In an individual private dwelling or an indi-
vidually metered apartment, supplied at one point of delivery and
measured through one meter. Customers applying for TR rate must
~ } remain on this rate for 12 continuous billing periods,
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to
temporary, standbyp or supplementary service except In conjunction
~tl I with applicable rider.
1
NET MONTHLY RATE
~ r (1) customer
Facility charge 10.00/30 days ~
.r; (2) Energy Charge
Billing months of June through Settembec:
12:00 Noon through 8:00 p.m. (Peak
Period) 10425/xWE
(Weekdays and excluding all City of Denton
r` Holidays)
All other hours (Off Peak Period) 4.50/xWH
r, B_i111ng months of October through May:
All xWH 4.50/XWH
FrT''a (2) Energy Cost Adjustment
Schedule ECA
!MINIMUM BILLING
Facility Charge
r
TYPE OF SERVICE
;,e
r The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase
service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles
and at any standard voltages available from the City's distribution
system through one standard transformation. !there service of the
type desired by the customer is not already available at the int
M) r of service) special contract arrangements between the City and the
customer may be required prior to its being furnished.
;Y Y
r,
1 f
UJ, !i.{` a '
N
T 'II'I A
l: (tlf.f 'Ir
f PACE 16/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
i1 M s P
s
1
PAYMENT
i
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
y{ SPECIAL FACILITIES E
,
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
J PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
y annually.
b;
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
Sx \
;L 30
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
A charge per ERE of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
accordance with Schedule E.C.A. I
+
, x , Fk
' e,
L
q
r A." r n i ~ A
a
N l
Y
\1
.'~"1 "LLB
,w
H ,fin o. '
f L
~vr V~
fig, ~ i<~y
R
77
r
n rP,
i
P
PAGE 17/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
+W,:~Il4+~I+tnMyN~1~4dM W~0.5i4rr+"
,
20
sl
fly,J~i r
~ s ~"~sm.'P•
M
SCHEDW E TP
k PRIMARY TIME OP USE RATES
A lf APPLICATION
Applicable to approved electric service required for secondary
s distribution service at voltage levels not to exceed 690000 volts,
and billing demand equal to or greater than 750 EN. Customers
applying for TP rate must remain on this cats for 12 continuous
billing periods.
NET MONTHLY RATE
r t~
(1) Facility Charge 60.00/30 days
(2) Energy Charge
Billing months of June through Septemberr
12s00 Noon through 8100 p.m. (Peak Period) 12.00!/EWH
(Weekdays and excluding all City of Denton
Holidays)
y ;,r
All other hours (Off Peak Period) 3.50 /RWH
F' . Billing months of October through Mays
All KWH 31500/RWH
(3) Demand Charges No demand charge.
(1) Energy Cost AdJustments Schedule ECA
MINIMUM BILLING
a
x~ Facility Charge
All I
~Y :tip
TYPE OF SERVICE
x d At the City's available primary voltage and phase
S .t PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due it not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance..
PACE 19/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
j;yYWWNW wn~ ...........w [iurwwaydliAr4dfvkISLCIAf+,YflrYl w'urw...-., ,rIYLi.9~
{ l/" ~ °^^`sw?4ir 9:u1'=Lw„ q.~.+..."19.P+VM lM
1
i
`¢1
j '
SPECIAL FACILITIES
a'
f All services which require special facilities in order to meet
' the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to
I special facilities rider,
F` PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings {
v 1
annually.
formula: l
" ~ as
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
y A charge per RwB of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
accordance with Schedule E.C.A.
4 Y
vY
Y1 w
r
r
Y
-4.,
PAGE 19/EL9CTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
4~Y A 1 .ter'..... .v,,. .,.wr..r., yyc. uo-y... _ ___..,...»..asL.
Y ~59~. 1r 4WAN&I 1
d '~rY
f
J / I f
f
v
Ti. 'ra
{
f
SCHEDULE TO
i
GENERAL SERVICE TIME 01 USE RATES
APPLICATION
Applicable to approved electric service required for secondary
` distribution service at voltage levels not to exceed 480 volts. I
Customers applying for TG rate must remain on this rate for 12 con- 1
tinueus billing periods,
NET NONTELY RATE
4 (1) Facility Charge
t Single Phase 10.00/30 days
a Three Phase 120.00/30 days
(2) Energy Charge
Billing xanth$ of June through sevtember:
12100 Noon through 800 P.m. Osak Period) 10.23E/KMg
(weekdays and excluding all City of Denton
Holidays)
All other hours (Off Peak Period) 4,5E1KM
+ Kllll-2 Months of October throueh Mays
All KwH LSE/RMB
. 41,
(3) Demand Charges No demand charge
4g (6) Energy Coat AdjustMentt schedule ea
NININUN BILLING ( >
A,Y
Facility charge
4 ,r5 TYPE of BRIVICE
s, Secondary oervice available to commercial and industrial
. G "4 ? customerse The City Will supply single-phase service (or three-
phase service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60)
cycles and at any standard voltages available from the City's
p; distribution system through one standard transformation. where ;
service of the type desired by the customer is not already available
at the point of service, special contract arrangements between the 1
City and the customer may be required prior to its being furnished,
r
~ K J
` I
rl r
,t* PACE 20/ELECTRIC AA.TE ORDINANCE
p, 4 ,tl',t7a~rirv in.."+ w Aty. A4",4 n~f...L!yy:+f,
n
Qr~ F
:
' to
e
4
I
PAYMENT
« -i
r Bills are due when rendecedo and become past due if not paid
a within 15 calendar days from date of issuance..
SPECIAL FACILITIES
r. „L I
h"t All secvices which require special facilities in order to meet
` E customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
I, special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
' annually.
I
k } Formular
Actual ;lays in reading period x customer charge
ti g 30
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
'fir , r A charge p+r M of energy taken for fuel coat calculated in
accordsFice with Schedrle 8.C.A.
of '
Rf ~R4 S'- ~
5
I,
Kxy
VL '
I}
i
r
yy 4
tt ~ rte.
SGGf''t S -i
41
I ; ~b
PAGE 21/ELECTAIC RATE ORDINANCE
4 , .W'lWOk.r+0.1..a'' •.+wvrr..n..fi1i;C1YAJ:IC'f%ki1~44.VMA~a a •+w~iwlhfl~.ry~y ~R.".
tits
try . -
r
SCHEDULE 0-2
y
i STREET LIGHTING
3 J,. APPLICATION
'F Applicable
City
of to all street lighting owned and maintained b
Denton,
Y the
NET MONTHLY RATF
(l) Paclllty Chatae
Ad3uatment
Current ECA x monthly bulb wattage factor
. Bulb Wattaoe Factor
100W Sodium Vapor 4,50
250W sodium Vapor 18 xn
r /OOW Sodium Vapor 8024 105 K"
175W Mercury vapor 5025 159 KWH
25OW Mercury Vapor 9
70
8 6.25 8 KW
40OW Mercury Vapor 8.00 KWB
1000W Mercury vapor 11,75 153 x"
380 KWB
TYPE OP SERVICE
The city will supply single
_phase service
service if available at the for three-phsq
' and at any standard voItagaspavall l
Of eiver ) at Sixty (60) cycle the e ~ " a tSystem through One
City's distribution f
by the cunt and transformation.
user is not al alable service athe the f
,i of ready a point
service, special contract arrangements between '
customer may be required prior to the City and the
Its bean
9 furnish d,
~n PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become
within 15 calendar days from data of iaauance, Past due If not
paid
ti ' ~ r PRORATION 6F UTILITY BILLS
a) 81111ng for the Facility charge shall be
blliingo annually, Pormulai based on 12
~ Actual de r in readin
arlod x customs
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT t
" h A charge par
, accordance with Schedule Of energy taken for fuel
? + , v. cost calculated in
{ yra ' [enwaw w ^ F PACE 22ALECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
V
C
SCHEDULE 0-3
r TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTING
APPLICATION
)
Applicable to State and Local Government agencies that install
I~ and maintain their own street lights and traffic signals.
~ r
s, NET MONTHLY RATE
All xwe 1.900 per kwH
Yr TYPE OF SERVICE
k
' ' At the City's available secondary voltage and phase.
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
w within 15 calendar days from data of issuance ,
MAINTENANCE CHARGE
"k u * Maintenance expenses billed at coat.
I&
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities In order to meat
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the i h•
r special facilities rider,
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT '
A charge per EwE of energy taken for fuel cost calculate in
accordance with Schedule E.C.A.
r
i
J
r a
a
q ~
I )
y Y
y .;r to
PAGE 23/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
1q~ 4 1 r C • '„~j/6.M.aa... r.. r rw''d'W VY '~fk3JWJ]Y _ % trd,•~n. 'N~L¢flW+l`RMY^
JMJA, tiPnhnr.a.r .«srJ1r1A9 Tl:: ,M:~✓
r
r,
r
i
9 a..
j
A. SCHEDULE D-1
{ DUSK TO DAWN LIGHTING
f '
APPLICATION
Applicable to any customer within the area served by the City's
t
electric distribution system for outdoor area lighting when such
j lighting facilities are operated as an extension of the City's
distribution system,
NET MONTHLY RATE i
{1) eacillty Cherye
. (2) Energy coat Adjustment
Current ECA x monthly bulb wattage factor
s c- i t ,
ti
Bulb Wattage Factor
A 100W Sodium Vapor 6.20 48 XWH k
E 25OW Sodium Vapor 8.20 105 KWS {
F 4001f Sodium Vapor 10.10 159 KWH
B 175K Mercury vapor 5.45 70 KWH
` C 25OW Mercury Vapor 6.10 96 KWe
D 40OW Mercury Vapor 6.85 153 KW
y TYPE OF SERVICE
" The City shall furnish, lnatall, maintain and deliver electric
service to automatically controlled, mercury or sodium vapor
lighting fixtures conforming to the City's standards and subject to t
its published rules and regulations.
r Where necessary for proper illumination or where existing
'r.] poles are inadequate, the City will install or cause to be instal
-
10
led, one (1) pole for each lnstallrl light, at a distance not to
exceed eighty (804) feet from said existing lineal at no charge to
the customer, Each additional pole span shall not exceed a span
,i
spacing of one hundred (1001) feet. Additional poles required to
install a light in a customer's specifically desired location, and
not having a light installed on same, shall bear the cost.
PAYMENT
' ;r sills are due when rendered, and become
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance past due if not paid
b
+ , lira It
1
Rid .
iE y v n
3
PAGE 21/ELECTRIC RATE
j M.»..,..._ ORDINANCE NAMfi.Yti`i'J q.,
;Pn+ sa.`,lyntM,q'Mua•wia'w':.Wa~;~«s+n.v.»,... ♦r~
ti
Xhweay.aY._,u_. V _y
F
k ~
i
F
TERM OF CONTRACT
€ A two (2) year contract shall be agreed to and signed by each
customer desiring Dusk-to-Dawn Lighting Service authorizing fixed
monthly charges, which may be reviewed annually, and to be applied
to the monthly municipal utilities bill. In the event that a
r customer desired the removal of the unit or discontinuance of the
service prior to completion of two (2) yearn, the remainder of the `
contract period shall become due and payable, After the end of the l
initial two (2) year contract, service shall continue on a month-
V
to-month basis and may be cancelled by either patty upon thirty (30)
FF days notice,
SPECIAL FACILITIES
lli All service which requires special facilities Jz order to meet
the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to
special facilities rider.
f PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
a 'I Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually,
` Formulas
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
s 30
ERERCY COST ADJUSTMENT
A charge per KWN of energy taken for fuel cost calculated In
accordance with Schedule B.C.A.
W 1 1 ~ ri•
i .r t
n/
r i
r
a + 1. ~ ~ a
d PACE 25/BLECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
I w~,a a,•. alAtra.n.~
41,
y a
Y IY~ i
R
~ rat`
12-4
i
SCHEDULE T-1
i
TEMPORARY SERVICE
APPLICATION II
Applicable when a customer requeete electric service on a i
short term or temporary basis. i
NET MONTHLY RATE
f.
5 11) Facility Charge
Single Phase 10.00/30 days
s' Three Phase 15,00/30 days
(2) Energy Charge r~6,50t/EMH
RI d; 13) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule
MINIMUM SILLINO
§#I Facility charge
TYPE OF SERVICE
At the City$s available secondary supply,
a'II' , PAYMENT
" Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 13 calendar days from date of issuance .
r ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY SERVICE CHARGES 4
Labor (Regular Time) 40,40 minimun up to 1 hour,
v(+ 0 40940 for each additional hour (to
be measured to the nearest
one-Quarter hour),
:t Labor (Overtime) 60.20 minimum up to 1 hours
60,20 for each additional hour (to
be measured to the nearest
one-gaarter hour), premium time to
< be added whore applicable, 1
Transportation To be billed by hours or miles, as
applicable, according to the j
estimated cost of operating the
y . MY A
equipment. ,
r
~A4
t.o
"r
e
fw 1r ~ ' I
PAOI 26/ELVTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
tkG,.RM ....'.a., 1ya"kv" ~AR►IxL:MM'1'6i:°!W:iu+`*.`~'° .
M
{ .
r
j Material Material thtct cannot be salvaged to
j ~
be billed at Stores cost plus 251 and
I applicable soles tax,
i At the time a temporary service is
removed or converted, any loss in the
material Installed due to negligence
1 or willful action by the customer j
I will be billed separately to customer {
at Stores Cost plus 251 and salsa tax.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to
special facilities rider, See Section 25-23(e) for standard
F requirements.
PRORATION OP UTILITY BILLS
' Billing for the Facility charge shall b
t annually. • hued on 12 billings
+ rw Formulas "
Actual 1 dais in reading Period x customer Ch` a~ge
30
,s
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
A charge per ENN of energy taken for fuel cast calculated in
accordance with Schedule E,C,A,
* a f
r
do ~,1xi
yd
' PACE 27/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
sr. o,~a.~Aury~r.riss+~S+k"►Wah~iNii}4ei1~Y
,
r-
+
}
t
j SCHEDULE PI
INTERRUPTIBLE PRIMARY SERVICE
1 APPLICATION
Applicable to all customers taking primary service at a firm
power load exceeding 5,000 KVA during the months of June, July,
August and September and is, by contract, provided service subject
to load interruptions, ll
NET MONTHLY CHARGE (Estimated transmission firm) 4
{ (1) facility charge $45.00/30 days
(2) Energy charge 2.60/KWH
(3) Demand Charge 5.001KW
a sc! (i) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
F 1` .r within 15 calendar days from data of issuance .
MINIMUM BILLING
a ,tip
Yr An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but ;
not less than seventy percent (700 of the maximum monthly KM
r: 14 4. similarly determined during the previous billing months of MAY
through OCTOBER in the 12 months ending with the current month, nor 1
a) LESS than 750 XW.
TYPE Of SERVICE
Primary voltage service (transformation equipment owned by f
customer) is available to any customer with a 12-month minimum monthly
• demand of 7S0 KM or greater, Primary service rendered at one point on
the customer's premises at a nominal voltage of 17,200 volts or 69,000
volts three-phase at the option of the utility.
The primary voltage service customer shall own, operate# and
maintain all facilities necessary to receive three phase primary voltage
service and all transformation facilities required for conversion to
utilirmtion voltage. The City shall own, operate and maintain all
metering facilities, either at primaty or secondary voltage, at the
Utility's option. Where the City elects to meter at secondary voltage,
two percent shall be added to the demand charge, the energy charge and
the energy cost adjustment charge to account for transformer losses.
a'
PAGE 28/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
fF
,
t
r
E DETERMINATION Of DEMAND
j The demand shall be the xW supplied during the 15-minute period of
1 maximum use during the current month as determined by City's demand
meter, but not less then 701 of the maximum monthly KW similarly
determined during the previous billing months of MAY through OCTOBER in f
the 12 months ending with the current month, nor LESS than 750 xW.
ROWER FACTOR REQUIREMENTS AND ADJUSTMENTS
The City reserves the right to make tests to determine the
:j power factor of the user's installation served hereunder during i
periods of maximum demand for the monthly billing periods. Should
the power factor to determined be below ninety (901) percent, the
demand for billing purposes will be determined by multiplying the
uncorrected xW billing demand by ninety (901) percent and dividing
by the determined power factor.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All service which requires special facilities in order to meet
the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
y
(a) Billing for the facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
Formulae
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30
(b) willing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per
month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods.
Formulae
Actual days in reading period x xW Demand x Rate
30
1
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT t,
tm A charge per XWB of energy taken for fuel coat calculated in
accordance with Schedule E.C.A.
t i f~l ~ 1
CGS :,:G t ~ flil'(
4 y _
t "I
. fah ,
t ,
PACE 29/tLECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE`
v
•.,."~i7d;:.m~:;j~yggvA,~+;t+•; w-, ..,.,.,.,w.•~w;•..r:..~. a:9ry4(Y'°$u+e~+s-^
!'i s y
I
SCHEDULE AF
i
ATHLETE FIELD E
APPLICATION
I
Applicable to all electric service metered at one
point for III
use to light specified areas for athletic events where such I
electrical use will not occur between the hours of 30100 A.M. and
7100 PAM.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Customer Facilities Charge
single Phase }70,00 per 30 days
Three Phase #30,00 per 30 days
J
` (2) Energy Charge
k Billing months of June through Septembers
4 All other Hours(Off Peak) 3.750 per KMH
1000 AM to 7100 PM(Peak) 7.500 pfr KMH
(Weekdays excluding City Holidays)
Billing months of October through Mayt w
4 All hours 3.750/RMH
r .1
(3) Demand Charge
a " ` } Billing months of June through Feeteabert
All Other Hours(Off Peak) #1.00 per KM per 30 days
10100 AN to 7100 PNspeak) #1.50 per KM per 30 days
billing months of October through May!
sf -
All hours 01.00 lkr kW per 30 days
• a,,
(4) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA Schedule
MINIMUM BILLING
facility Charge
1.
~t
v:
4r ,
l
PAGE 30/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE ~
y ~ ? ..~j~&dl~'FMYJ.r Aai► v.+>•• •••,.»a,vu..~asaknt 75'tY~Mdxrv,'MW. •n.:u,.w-~ihln!)jCraila n'4~~oRLA14'+'ei'+"
1
TYPE OF SERVICE
At the City's available secondary voltage and available phase,
For use only between the hours of 7:00 P.M. and 10100 A.M, from June
through September and 711 hours from October through May,
j j
POWER FACTOR If
I ~
The City reserves the right to make tests to determine the
i power factor of the customer's installation served during periods of
maximum demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the
monthly billing period. If the power factor is below ninety
G f. percent, the demand for billing purposes will be determined by
multiplying the uncorrected FW billing demand by 90% and dividing by
the determined power factor.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
J customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
a PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12;
billings annually.
i
Formular
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
y+, 33
(b) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per
month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods.
Formulas
ketual_days in reading period x XW demand x Rate
„ 30 deye
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
x vY:[ A charge per xNB of energy taken for fuel cost calculated !n}
i accordance with Schedule E,C.Ae
\.i. ST+ .L 1
1 F
F x
,
e ,
PACE 31/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
/ % t Ye.++a „,,..r......... _ _._,.,_.......•,e.,iiti,tww«A6r.lwucweur.w..e. _....:T.. «,+tAXti'~Ci'A~R°++1y''Y„ .
f. d
'A
L,
I
I
1
SCHEDULE ECA
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
i
All monthly KW8 charges shall be increased or decrtased by an
amount equal to X cents per KWN, to be known as the energy cost
adjustment (ECA). The ECA shall be computed in the months of April
and October to be applied to the following periods of May through
October and November through April respectively, The City shall in
no case change the energy cost adjustment more than twice in either f
of the Six (6) months periods. The ECA shall be calculated by the
following formulas
{
' ECA (Winter) • Projected energy cost for winter months t
Projected KWH sales for winter monthi
ECA (Summer) • Projected energy cost for summer months
Projected KWH sales for summer months
The above formula results in Winter 1986/87 and Summ-ar 1987 ECA'S as
followst
ECA (Minter) ■ 2100E/KWH
ECA (Summer) 2,090/KWE
' ` 1111
h In the event that actual cumulative costa of fuel, variable
costs of Texas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA) energy and purchased
energy (excluding TMPA's fixed charges) is greater than or less than
the cumulative ECA revenues by 4100000000 during the fiscal year,
j the City may recompute the Energy Cost Adjustment and re-establish
an ECA that collects or returns such difference over the remaining
months of the fiscal year, Such change in ECA shall be applied
evenly to all remaining months' ECA,
.
I nil
i
y j
I
PAGE 32/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
j
i
SCHEDULE UPS
UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY
APPLICATION
Applicable to any customer who$ by written agreement, receives
service for uninterruptible power supply for a computer or other
electrical equipment.
r' Not applicable for resale service in any event, iior to
" temporary or standby service except in conjunction with applicable
rider.
z` NET MONTHLY RATE
1) Customer Facility Charger
i " 90 W Power Standby Unit 12.70/30 days
200 W Power Standby Unit 17.50/30 days I
2) Installation Charge #20.00
,
TYPE OF SERVICE
r The City shall furnish, install, maintain an automatically
01, 4q controlled alternating current power backup unit conforming to the
city's standards and subject to its published rules and regulations.
P Y ENT
kr Bills are due when rendeted, and become past due if not paid
F within 15 calendar days from data of issuance i
SPECIAL FACILITIES
r r ;
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
M customer's service raquiremente shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
r6; PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
sl Billing for the Facility charge shall be basod on 12
billings annually.
IormulaI
Actual days is reeding period x customer chafes
30
r'r:<
5 hi
i
v Irv
PAGE 33/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
~ayrL'✓~'P•rw 7.r'e nrm _ .-.~..rr-.wvW.fM ;Wtif,RYNY n...;.. _ r
. b ."'3 .*r+trn,»~>vdAf,&Ati~k' Mme. -.,,nl,~,. ,'~<id:~hviti!'Gw%zd+a:++A•
4
/ r
i
V
SECTION II.
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or
word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances
is held Invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not
s' affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City
Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted
such remaining portion, despite any such invalidity.
I` SECTION III.
That the Schedulo of Rates adopted by ordinance No. 85-24 shall continue
P , to be effective, charged and applied to the last regular billing cycle which
begins prior to match 3, 1987,
SECTION IV.
rP f, That the Schedule of Rates heroin adopted shall be stfective, charged and
applied to the first regular billing cycle on or after March 3, 1987.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of
r 1987.
t , RAY
BTEPE
e
N8, MAYOR r
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
r 4; ATTEST1
f+l
~~~4~~ JENNI/ER HALTERS
ACTiNO CITY 82CRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
t f, APPROVED AS TO LEOAL FORM$
°r F HERA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
r CITY Of bIM00 TEXAS
IY
,
~P EYr {
y4
C
M~ ~ !
t
q ~
3 1
L 1
fN~Sw~w i. _ 1 TM'1YPACE 34/ELECTRIC RATE ORDINANCE
k ~ ' ' +w«.nur.+ns+3r:?r:,L'~m+r16Rt~W?iW>w.w....w«, .w...m
~ k~ r
ATTACHMENT 1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GRNERM RACRGROUND
Management Applications Consulting, Inc. (MAC) was retained by
the City of Denton, Department of Utilities, to conduct rate
review studies for their electric, water, and wastewater
utilities. The Utility Department has performed rate studies
previously, both in-house and with outside consultants. MAC has
attempted to build upon the techniques and procedures used in
these prior studies to develop an overall evaluation of utility
rates, uhort term financial position, and long tern revenue
requirement trends. Our findings area
t 1. The wastewater utility will )n
gt need a rate change for
,f the coning fiscal year, nor is it likely to need a rate
fi increase through the fiscal period ending 1909. The
caveat to this finding is that when fiscal year 1986
revenues are finally audited and nornalised, that there
will be no significant Impact on the overall debt
coverage ratio or funds available for payment of return
on Investment.
2. The water utility will have a shortfall in fiscal year j
1967 which Is likely to continue through the fiscal
period ending 1909. Rate relief is needed to most
short term fiscal year 1987 revenue requirements and
will be needed again with the commencement of Denton's
Ray Roberts payments, The proposed revenue increase is
9.51 for fiscal 1987. Approximately 51 is needed to
meet short term financial goals and 4.51 is to be ap-
plied to future Ray Roberts y payments. The sate study
Steering committee aVrood that this initial rase in is
1 needr-1 ►q rvs4rn ►He r ►
J e F. of tin (,,Y N4b?Ct^a
project, A mechanism should be estblished to apply
$ *~b.1r .,a . ..rir w ~a, .u;.rEU .a.:v......... ai v<,...:r. 4<*^-~':a~.n.r>.+
r
_ J
i
i '
this phase in revenue to the future revenue require-
ments resulting from the project.
~i The increase is applied to rate classes with the
philosophy of moving in the direction of equalised debt
I
coverage rates. Exhibit I.1 shows the distribution of
the proposed increase among rate classes.
3. The electric utility will see a decrease in the energy
cost adjustment INCA) for fiscal year 1997 and a cos-
mitment to cost containment will allow a slight
deer ass in base rates. The overall ECA reduction of
21 will act as an across-the=board decrease while the
base rate reduction of 3.261 will. be directed to move
toward equal!xlnq debt coverage ratios between classes.
The proposed overall rate reduction is 2.901 txhibit I-
2 shows the distribution of the proposed rate decrease.
t
The overall financial picture for the Utilities Department is
` r sound and has been supported by continuous load growth and a
strong accumulated reserve fund. Time of day rates have been
proposed on a trial basis along with wheeling, stand-bye and
cogeneration rates for the electric utility.
A separate financial analysis was conducted for each of the f
utility functions. The results of these financial models have
boon used to set the overall revenue targets for each of the
utilities. A detailed cost of service study has been conducted
for the electric and water utilities. These cost of service
studies have been used to establish class revenue targets and &I-
locate the decrease or increase in rates to classes based on
•r~ their respective financial performance. A detrtled time period
cost analysis was also conducted for the electric utility to es-
toblish the basis for she dp~r.~ rrnent• of innovative rakes The
k ,r Frr'i` Probability r)f r. mr r l• <fas u I I ir, -1 Irl lhi.^a i
detailed time period analysis. This approach has been used and
-2-
r
v
EXHIBIT I-1 f
0.49 Prooaod 1Yalw po% Inwegw
0.2 1
0.10 Nid 96se'ddj' E
ale
0.14-
0.12-
C~n~n I~wb ~
A9
0
;i
IA
CAN
0,04
0.02
0 I
1
' ku Clwa
Proposed Class Increases
Residential Average
9.85
Commercial/industrial 8,45
86109 fnr Resale 9.26
►irs PrO.'lCtion 18.00
antra-Government
Raw Water 12.00
Treated Slater 8.45
Tot&& Water System 4.50 k
*Summsr months only JMay - October)
.f
i
r
j
-3
i
EXHIBIT 1--2
' Propssd Ouido Aek D"m w
Oa i
0
Al
-1 R4
! ~
-3
LP 0-D
-4 AR
Oe ~ j
Op e1
Asb Cram"
f Proposed Class Decreases
Assidential (R-1) 0.01
Residential (R-2) -0.55
General Service (09) -4.09
Gen Serv Pri (GP) -5.77
Large Primary (LP) -3.28
Local Gov (01) -5.72
Street Ltg (02) -3.11
Traffic Signal Ltq (03) 0.00
'Dusk-tO-Dawn Ltg (D-D) -3.11
Athletic field Ltg tArl 3.58 1
Religious Worship (Rw) -3.87
Tempary Service (T1) -1.86
*Summer m, i,•, +r , + r
Z / ~~C,tEAsa- ~(/,~csucr f,Ce~/
EIV~~~m P/h'wy~Q✓ as7NJ~r
en,OVIIN G 71110
x,15 f~KwN T - 4 ,
,r
y
p,
i
I
L;, I accepted by the Public Utility Commission of Texas in rate cases
for the state's investor owned utilities for many years. where
possible, and where available data permitted, the studies have
been conducted to comply with rUCT guidelines.
Throughout the nation, the utility environment and philosophy is
rapidly changing. Pressures from regulatory authorities and
' economic pressures for overall cost containment are forcing
utilities, to offer more services and alternative pricing
strategies to meet the flexible needs of today+s consumer. Cos-
petition for new customers along with the need to keep existing
customers in a strong competitive position adds to this pressure.
e These factors will force a re-direction 'in planning, pricing, and
s. operating philosophy a,fay from suPPIY side
projecli'(building new
„a. plant) to demand side programs which offer customers a menu of.
services including conservation and load management alternatives.
The first step is for management, the Board, and Council to
recognise this transition and edopt an approach which will ensure
a stable growth for the utility. The next stop is to dedicate
more resources to collecting, analysing and utilizing a full
tango of customer oriented data needed to deal with these coming
s. issues.
t
Y'
of ; '1 v +i
f
i. .
tY
1l
r r
fir i I
\ 1
1
i
:
a
ATTACIMENT 2
City of Dmton Yoto4ter Utility Page 3 of 4
1966 Pate Design Sudy
Pmjtctian of Aevetx+e Apuirwnts
Description FY 9-304S 1Y 9.30.86 FY 9.30.61 IY 9-30-66 FY 9-30.0
Historical* projected 1 Total Operating Expenses 11,764,660 $2,124,126 $3,244,546 $3,311,376 $3,641,419
Plust
2 Debt Service 1,011,609 I, 124,S40 1,093,799 1,064,714 1,062,150
1 Capital Addition Cumnt Fading 41,717 70,122 70,122 39, us 40,601
4 Hot Used 0 0 0 0 0
tee6t
5 OVW lererruee 52,625 53,000 100,000 1001000 100,000
6 NO-Owdirg Avertw 143.949 36,000 60.000 $0,000 60,000
7 4011t Cob Aroma A8*11 resent $2,64.49 $3,236, 224 $4, 2M,169 $4,30,140 $4,604,190 1
a 4 Percent 0+a!ge m 22.1% 31.30k , 2.V% S.6%
9 Wit Oak Service 11,011,601 11,124,510 $1,013,199 $1,04,111 $1,012,150
3i
10 4 ales Experoes Before
$1,6,43 St.10,4 13,15,370 0,64,1813,620
Debt corerage
_ Plus t
j 11 Interest Fortier of Debt 619,539 701,730 672,611 641,70 601,190
$ 12 Depreciation Expert 766,145 70,145 70,145 766,14 766,145
13 Eywlst Aatwl Ism neV1.s rtt 3.015,527 3,575,523 4,164,214 4,671,016 4,0.)M
` 14 Plant in Service 13),919,106 $31,190,024 $31,931,761 132,075,111 $32,251,9?!
15 least Accwlated Depredation 16,616,162 $1,432,007 0,211,152 $4,964,291 19,110,442
16 Plust CHIP lad funded 0 O 0 O 0
17 lout CaMMbutiom 14,910,570 14,910,570 14,910,510 14,910,570 14,910,S70
14 484161 Net Plant in Somm 10,32 U$ 91521,446 6,103,039 41160,40 1,596,909
19 Operating Avettw 14,413,934 $4,977,130 13,225,9/1 $5,47,246 16,706,177
t., IateAaMSxi'6ratrth NA 161,196 24,417 261,291 219,491
20 But Plate *a" NA 0.001 0.004 0.001 0.0%
F 21 mt Used
22 Aetum (19)-{I3) 11,748,ID7 11,401,607 $631,773 1114,191 1610,42
23 Ate of ktum (22)/(18) 1714A 14.711 1,164 9.951 1016M
i, 24 Avg 46.11 kWm, Ate of Aetum $752,135 S.OM
' 25 Debt Cover* Atio ({19)•(7))/(2) 3.13 2.54 1.89 2.05 2.02
26 Fundt Ave IIabla After bebt (19)-(7) $2,165,502 $1,140,902 1916,116 $1,131,346 11,102,511
21 Atumm Imutta tt 497,700 453,719 485,100 465,100 415,100
24 funds Mailable After Mtum 1,661,602 11257,663 491,716 652,266 617,467
AYE 29 Dorking Cwtal
30 Coat par 100006 1.3445 1137)0 1,3731 1.3732 1.1711
Pq v
1
1
y
II
I~
City of Denton Yasterater Utrilty Page 4 of 4
1986 Rate Design Study
v Description rY 9.70.86 FY 9.3047
I.
Rwenues $4,911, M $5,225.907
Operating Expenses 2,124,826 7,244,548
Dow Avenues (10,000) (1.60,000}
04bt Soria 11128,"D 1,093,290
10,122 70,122
Capital Additions
' Return on Immbmt 457,230 415,100
4 "
Y004 Capital D 0
e^
' Rnsalnder 1,211,663 491,111
100*1 Sales 7,625 7,106
S/i000pa1 1.7170 1,7771
lncraW (0arwa)
~l t
}d4 5
~ y .
L /r
- N.Y iVr ...~y ivA ?BRIIb4~
Cd. w,:.., ..v. - .w r
i
W
i
{ EXHIBIT 111.2 Page 1 of / a
City of Denton Water Utility
1986 Rate Design Study
y
PAYOU Requirement Input Parameters
Oescrl..ton fY 9.3045 fY 9.30-M FY 9.30-8? FY 9.30-18 fT 9.30.19
c Operating Ex -
j pensai
' Personal Serrlces 3 MIO,924 $1,131,623 $1,701.945 :1,781,042 1'1,661,265
y . (Capitalized labor) (93,992) (76,191) (76,191) ($16,960) ($18.19!)
I Supplies 201,116 212,726 212,950 275,276 210,711
j Purdwe Pawn 657,019 SM.64 611,000 763,190 978,931
Mint enmee 651,712 136,166 677.08 613,195 697,471
Purdwed Water • 169,000 612,100 1,133, 730
Softies 768,445 902,362 243,000 219,430 290.339
IM 1 Sundry 22,916 25.491 37,650 39.143 40,931
"i Adoln Tr" (Non-return or Debt) 604,186 396,619 624,0990 SM,720 561,308
` (other Cpitelind costs) (1,160) (61,204) (17,201) (25,397) (29,906)
a . Subtotal 4,012,035 4.010,101 4,616,9M 5,123,108 5,732,968
OU1er Operating Pievantwel -
not tad 0 0 0 0 0
not used 0 0 0 0 0
not used 0 0 0 0 0
rat wed 0 0 0 0 0
Top fm 211,707 210,000 400,000 400,000 100,000
,r not wed 0 0 0 0 0
not Load 0 0 0 0 0
tr' ` mt 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 211,701 210,000 40,000 400,000 400.000
V
s Non-Oporatirp Aevorawi
yfkit i sold Of Strip m 1,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
Interest been 182,199 640,000 293,000 293,000 293,000
Mlae 93,331 2,000 55,000 95,000 59.000
not uad 0 0 0 0 0
Aid In Ceestruction $3,642 31000 31000 1.000 3,000
rot used 0 0 0 0 0
n ~r
Subtotal
330,724 616.000 15110M 3541000 354,000
s Ot1w Intonations
riot Und
l - not uNd
i ; riot used
led Wo
Sa1N loll oil 1.452 31625 3.106 1,996 4,156
s~
t
,
r
I 1
[ `I
City of Denton Water Utility Pepe 6 of 1 li
r 1916 Acts Design Study
f' t }
Description FY 9-70.16 n 9-70 ar
4,. j• .......v................................................................•........ u...ou.......
t f , Iwven,n i sS,193, 231 $5,161,893
Dperetieg ixpmM {,090,102 4,M6,0
u Dow tw "m (sm.Coo) (rJ6,00D)
Debt Service 1,4711117 i,610,923
capital Additions 10,401 113,101
} Aetunt an 1"Misew mom MIND
tlw*4 hpiul 0 0 p,.
~ ,Y J Y ~ Piwnlyder 7101011 (196,301)
10*1 Salt 3,62! 7,106
,i ~,w., ' /i $/100>Nl 1.1191 1.1119
. Incrom (Osavre) r
ilA 3.114
r
r,
~i
Kra
t
d
EXH11IT 111.3 Page 1 of 4 S
f
City1966 entt1 Doi ign Study
i 9n y
Aeveuue 1Nquireeerut Input Parasutera
. .
as~lptl~ ..9-....S FY9.30-16 FY 9-)0.67 FY 9-30.66 FY O.30-1
Operating Expenses:
Personal Servim 12,591,31 113,632,674 14,631,000 14,/'.4,900 $5,162,01/
y (Capitall:ed labor) (365,025) (307,614) (400,000) (1404,000) ($412,010)
Supplies 2)1,755 244,c: r 371,000 311,160 316,416
Caw Ity Portion Of purchase Peer 21,559,600 230191,170 266614,050 21,161,112 34,706,266
7lainte anee 561, 361 193, 761 1, 211,000 1,101,970 1, 336,166
Services 279,643 410,198 630,000 636,300 60,026
Ins 6 Sundry 140,338 150,065 231,000 239,370 244,157
A6ein Trans (Mao-return or Oe1t) 1,261,166 1,314,126 !,310,000 !,348,300 1,400,272
(Other M
r all:ed Costs) (116,163) (114,738) (132,000) (133,320) (135,06)
a; 26,069,610 29, 34,6611,060 36,011,112 43, IN, 333
e'
Other Electric Aeveemi
v 117U Cepedty 516'710 136,910 67,760 '`11,11 17,160
" TO hpecity 1,033,910 153,010 419,290 471,250 479,250
eEa Capacity 0 0 375,000 316,000 2151000
t Ecdtogr 41Nrgy Sales 3,111,470 2,573,970 1,211,120 1,622,144 3,174,201
(E4 y Sales Cate) (1,30,311) (1,631,111) (111,080) (1,072,31) (2,016,101)
Carrel Flaft 147,000 160,000 150,000 150,400 150,000
ArremtIft Fees 191000 15,000 11,000 15,000 15,000
t Ms er TaspeHng 0 0 0 0 0
Collections 200 4,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
j other d 901000 136,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Swbtot
60.. 2,316,352 1,642,140 1,751,116 2,216,101
. ' ; Ilan-Obinting IMvenw+ '
` Salo Of Scrap 5,000 30,000 6,000 9,000 1,000
Intarw+t Imam 710,061 160,000 270,000 270,000 270,000
Mbee 25,000 9,000 10,000 10,000 16000
Muage Mowry
3,600 1,000 2,500 .2,600 2,600
Aid In Construction 14,000 66,000 161000 11,000 15,000
A, ;
W ca Center w 164,341 161,341 164, 340 164,30 164,340
%
r,
Subtotal 9112,010 1,019,341 166,140 166,61 461,110
Other lnfaeatlons
Fuel ♦ Furdrst Parer &*W 201103,110 I5, in, 610 14,0061490 1116721300 13,660,011
(Now For Off Systems W") (1,316,311) (1,631,611) (414,0801 (1,072,30) (2,016,406)
k4>• Not Fuel a lurdtase Pow Energy 19,417,312 13,61,992 13,161,100 14,499,932 11,662,316
OW 0*1 I
Sales (16N)el,aoo 60,04 61, In 102,631 717,712 767,213
.a
1 ~
• r •::.J:AYp.4 .YY+'Y.r
b
{
}
Pte. -4.. ~
i
1
1
i Pips 2 of 4
Expo Mwrw Growth: 1916 1969
r~ P*mol SMICK 5.001 6.001
~ SupP{in 1.001 2.001 j
Cawity Portion Of Purchbo Power CW% 25.001 1
. IMirM«tlnn 1.D01 2.001
'r. SMV icr» 1,901 2.0%
p 1M a &Wry 1.0% 2.001
Akin Trans (Non•retum or Dtbt) 3100% 1.00%
one AwMw Growth: Sells Gmm
Iw 5.001
IN$ S.W%
F ; %910 1.0%
1 y
i 4
r
n F, ~ [q
'j,i YfQf ~ 1^ - ,4 F-
2
gyp::, ff
i
k•
y
r
%LW
k
fi
'Ah
II
j City of Denton Electric Utility Page 3 of 1
195 Pate Design Study
Projection of Awenw Aequlrntatts
.
Description
FY 9.30-85 FY 9.30.M FY 9.30.87 FY 4.30.66 FY 9.30-69.
Historical
Prq~etted
I total Operating Expenses-Less
Fuel 6 Rodue Energy 126.069,690 0,983,424 $34,652,050 $36,011,112 $43,338,333 ~
Plum
2 Debt Service 2,951,120 3,117,?a 3,211,041 3,186,911 31179,216
3 Capital Additions Cantrnt Funding SW, in 472,353 532,000 $37,320 516,066
4 lbt Used 0 0 0 0 0
less:
S Otter Electric Aeverua 3,867,932 2,316,352 1,642,110 1,190,766 2,265.107
6 Non4pertting %vow 962,010 1,014,341 166.110 166,W 461,W
7 Equ11U Cash Aewnw AKpirwsnt $21,941,366 530.51,372 SM,2910SI1 $37,$10,131 544,312,9M
P hmot a" m 21.124 19. so 3.3" 18.134
`a
»c' 9 Last Debt Service $2,951,420 $3.317,IM $3,217,041 33;116,927 13,179,216
10 44111 Etrpetxes Won
Pluet Debt Coverogs 121,49,936 127,040,514 $33,074,470131,321,10P $41,133,753
d" I1 Interest "Ion of Oebt $1.123,610 2 09l,OQ9 2,006,511 1,916,611 1,819,216
12 DwWation Eepeme 11472,516 2005047 20116146 21 In, 661 2,272,52
13 Egwlw Accrual Mvenw Requlnttatt 25,716,152 31,167,066 37,197,491 31,430A 15,226,520
E 14 Plant in Senior
. ~ X2,095,397 $81,114,961 01,119,951 $63,210,651 $66,419,951
IS last kemlated Depnelatlen $29,6061210 $29.119,040 $311236,526 533,a1,793 S35,?00,314
iRl Le1ot Contributions 626,316 610,366 55,316 1M, 3M 616, 3N
r 17 Plult CHIP (bad Fused) 0 0 2,141,000 2,59,000 2,111,000
k} 16 Egwlst Not Plant In Service 21.160.741 31,360,525 31,370,040 31,111,173 32,351,221
It Sala Aewnue Las (CA $33.1101615 135,610,111 537,4221826 139,193,95 110.15,126
gas bwnwti0m HA 2,470,112 1,7M2,039 1,171,111 1,571,759
20 We Ante Chnge 14 0.0011 0.001 0.004 0.004
21 Ovent I Rate adv 0.0% 0.006 0.006 0.0%
t 22 Aatum (10)•(13) 11,381.463 54.453,691 1225,330 5113,217 (14,359,791)
23 Astrr of Reeum (22)/(18) 26.554 14.201 o.M 1.714; •13.4"
e~. 94 Avg 5.10 Mtum, We of Aetum ($1,090,411) -2.144
~t 25 Oebt Ooveragl Ratio ((14}.(10))/{2) 3.14 2.19 1.35 1.66 -4.00
X 26 Furls Awllabla After Debt (19)•(1) So,22t,25o $5,212,415 $1,131,315 $1,163,234 ($3,441,24))
27 Mum At City 4wity 1,551,644 l,68o,7oS 1,767,35 1,792,139 1,122,661
13 21 Furdr Available After, Aeturtt 6,671,615 3,692,110 (636,013) (9,605) (5,260,910)
24 Wwkirp Capital I
30 see Rwenw pr % in 0.0543 010561 0.0367 0.0661 0.0561 )
31 804 per WA 0.0318 0.0216 0.01" 0.0209 0.0160 i
rY + 32 Total loot pr kA 0.0161 MOM 0.0166 0.0176 0.0727 R
:Y
1
f
1r.
_ City of Denton Elutrlc Utility Page 4 of 4
1966 Ante Design Study
...............Description n 9.30.66 H 9.3041
' f0teus:
We 135,640,161 131,122,126
Fuel 14,444,531 11,156,400
Teal 50,066,121 SO,S11.926
0pereting Expfm 6,24,06/
Fuel 1 lurcfwa pawn M
13,SM,S12 111131,400
bww
Toot 11,111,162 31,132,160
r
Teal 01 M u,an,lle u,ao,ao
4 Odw iterenw (3,116,611)
t. 3,:v,o11
Debt %MCI 3.117,m
. , 3. 422,361 312,000
coital Additions
kwm an In "U"t 1.0, 706 1,131,311
wAilq coital 0 0
' `s feiealnMr 4,W,23i (616,Ori)
.4
tia Mh sales 661,112 MAN
d
0,0716 0.096
ant vkwh
M~
4 i$c + ' r r s b1c. le (Oetreea)
1- 6 1, W
r
:S
!
t
4 EXHIBIT V A-2 08-Dec-06
City of Denton Water Utility
Current vs. Proposed Rates
Rate Schedule Propose Current
r Rates Rates
Residential Rate W1
3/4" Meter $5.00 $4.50
First 150000 gal 1.55 1.45
15,000 - 30,000 gal Summer 2.05 1.80
' i3 000 - 30,000 gal Winter 1.55 1.45
Ali over 30,000 Sal Summer 0.00 1.80
All over 30,000 gal Winter 0.00 1.45
z Cosmaercial/2ndustrial Nitta W2
3/4" !toter $10.25 $9.50
ar Commodity Charge/1000 gal 1.52 1.40
` Salea for Resale Rate W3
kinium Charge $164.25 $150.00
Demand'Charge per 110009a1 16.00 NA
Commodit Charge 0.63 1.35
Over 3,000,OOOgrI NA 1.65
A,E a Y
Intravernment Finished Water Rate W4
3/4" Meter $10.25 $9.50
Commodity"Charge/1000 gal 1151 1.40
I
~a Intra-Government Raw Water Rate W6
Minimum Charge $108.75 $9700
Commodity' Charge/1000gal 1.00 0490
Standby Fire Service Rate W7
6" Lino $14.25 $1Z400
ON Line 21.25 18600
h
Metared Hydrants Rate W10
y Custootr Charge Minimum $17.75 $15.00
Commodity Charge/1000ga1 1.65 1.40
M
t
t
.1 Y~Y
~n f
h
a1 ,J .
~i -~Na m..,^.. .,:....ri x,,.. .J~neDA•71b7N.41 .Jy~,rr.W
' roll.
bola '
Jar,
h
E EXHIBIT V A-3 j
City of Denton Water Utility
Residential Bill Comparison
Current Rates va Proposed Rates
City of Denton Water Utility Bill Comparison
Billed Proposed Rate W1 Current Rate w1 Current/Pro
gal posed
Winter Summer winter 1
Summer
Summer Winter
4
0 $5.00 $5.00 $4.50 $4.50 11.111 11.11
10000 6.55 6.55 5.95 5.95 10.08 10.08
21000 8.10 8.10 7.40 7.40 9.46 9.46
3,000 9.65 9.65 8.85 8.85 9.04 9.04
40000 11.20 11.20 10.30 10.30 8.74 8.74
60000 14.30 14.30 13.20 13.20 8.33 8.33
t ,
r ' 80000 17.40 17.40 16.10 16.10 8.07 8.07
10,000 20.50 20.50 19.00 19.00"',
•.,1.89 7.89
r 120000 23.60 23.60 21.90 21.90 7.76 7.76
14,000 26.70 26.70 24.80 24.80 7.66 7.66
3 15,000 28.25 28.25 26.25 26.25 7.62 7.62
a, 17,000 32.35 31.35 29.15 29.15 10.98 7.55
*y 19,000 36.45 34.45 32.05 32.05 13.73 7.49
218000 40.55 37.55 35.30 34.95 14.87 7.44
23,000 44.65 40.65 38.90 37.85 14.78 7.40
25,000 48.75 43.75 42.50 40.75. 14.71 7,36
280000 54.90 48.40 47.90 45.10 14.61 7.32
30,000 59.00 51.50 51.50 46.00 14.56 7.29
33,000 66.65 56.15 56.90 52.35 17.14 7.26
360000 74.30 64.80 62.30 -56,70 19.26 7.23
k 39,000 81.95 65.45 0.70 61.05 21.05 7.21
43,400 92.15 71465 74.90 66.85 23,03 7.18
460000 94.80 76,30 80.30 71.20 24428 7.16
49,000 107.45 80.95 85.70 75.55 25.38 7115
50,400 120.00 82.50 87,50 77.00 25.71 7.14
55000 122.75 90.25 96.50 84.25 27,20 7,12
60,000 135,50 96,00 105.50 91.50 28.44 7.10
y Block Charge
Proposed Rate R SUM Mr Winter Sumner winter
r, Customer Charge 5400 5.00
First Block 150000 150000 1.55 1.55
Second nine-k 1n,nnn 380000 2,na 1.55
Thiro 1)"" (MO 31)0000 2.S5 1.55
Y A
i
l
I
ATTACHMENT 3
EXHIBIT V A-2 08-Dec-66
City of Denton Water Utility
Current vs. Proposed Rates
Rate Sc e u e Pro se
E' Po Current
Rates
f Rates
Residential Rate WI
3/4" Motor $5.00
' First 15,000 9,61 $4.50
15,000 - 30,000 gal Summer 1.55 1.45
15,000 - 30,000 gal Winter 2'05 1.60
All over 30,000 gal Bummer 1.55 1.45
All over 30,000 gal winter 0'00 1.60
0.00 1.45
Coamercis1/Industrial Rate W2
3/4" Meter $10.25
CoaSmodity Chargd/1000 gal 1.52 59.50
1.40
Sales for Resale Rate W3
. Minima Charge $164.2
Demand Charge per 110009a1 6.00 $150.00
s, Cosmgdity 1
Charge 6.63 HA
Over 3,000,000gal MA 1.35
Intra-COVeramnt Finishad Water Rate w4
3/4" Motor
Commodity Charge/1000 gal $10.25 $9.50
1.52 1.40
\ w,( antra-Government Raw Water Rate W6 ~
Minim Charge
$97.00
Commadity`,Charge/1000gal $10100
0.90
Standby Fire Service Rate M7
L 6" Line $14.25 $12.00
6" Line 21425 16400
Motored Hydrants Rate W10
ar Customer Charge minimum $17.75 $15.00
+'~tat Commodity Char a/10
q 00gai 1.65 1.40
P
1 .
.3.
n
T r. •"•Oi: •:•fl ad .Y4Y:'.a,/.M4Y-'+'"""" _ _5 _prd.+".@<.,Ci1V
}
Y
i EXHIBIT V A-3
City of Denton Water Utility
Residential Pill Comparison I
Current Rates vs Proposed Rates
City of Denton Water Utility Bill Comparison
Billed Proposed Rate W1 Current Rate W1 Current/Proposed
gal Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter
} I
0 $5.00 $5.00 $4.50 $4.40 11.111 11.111
10000 6.55 6.55 5.95 5.95 10.08 10.06
21000 8.10 8.10 7.40 7.40 9.16 9.46
3,000 9.65 9.65 8.85 8.85 9.04 9.04
4,000 11.20 11.20 10.30 10.30 8.74 8.74
60000 14.30 14.30 13.20 13.20 8.33 8.33
8,000 17.40 17.40 16.10 16.10 8.07 8.07
10,000 20.50 20.50 19.00 19.00 X7.69 7.89
12,000 23.60 23.60 21.90 21690 7.76 7.76
h. "
„ 14,000 26.70 26.70 24.80 24.80 7.66 7.66
15,000 28.23 28.25 26.2S 26.25 7.62 7.62
170000 32.35 31.35 29.15 29.15 10.98 7.55
19,000 36.45 3.45 32.05 32.05 13.73 7.49
21,000 40.55 37.55 35.30 34.95 14.87 7.44
23,000 44.65 40.65 38.90 37.85 14.78 7.40
25,000 48.75 43.75 42.50 40.75 14.71 7.36
28,000 54.90 48.40 47.90 45.10 14.61 7.32
^I 30,000 59.00 51.50 51.50 48.00 14.56 7.29
f ± 33,000 66.65 56.15 56190 S2.3S 17.14 7.26
36,000 74.30 60.80 62.30 56.70 19.26 7.23
39,000 81195 65.45 $7.70 61.05 21.05 7.21
430000 92.15 71.65 74.90 66.85 23.03 7.18
46,000 99.80 76.30 80.30 71.20 24.28 7.16
49,000 107.45 80.95 85.70 75.55 25.38 7415
50#000 110,00 82450 87.50 77.00 2501 7114
35,000 122.75 90.25 96.50 84.25 27.20 7.12
~r 60,000 135.50 98.00 105.50 91.50 28.44 7.10
Block Charge
Propos4A Rate R Summer Winter Summer Winter
Customer Charge 5.00 5.00
' First Block 150000 15,000 1.55 1.55
Second fill.&k 1n,hnfl 3A,000 2.h+ 1155
Third 131- 1 :11,(11111 311,000 2.G5 1.55
.r
i
• Yd86'.R,.'Pf: .r9n r:.r. a. a,.,,•1.'r4 MrA..1iv ..1 i...e a:. i+S'.A+v MI ~Y .:L-'• SLrI +.iNdrM.
i
EXHIBIT A V-4
City of Denton Water Utility
Commercial Bill Comparison
Current Rates vs Proposed Rates
E
Alt: City of Denton Water Utility Bill Comparison
Billed Proposed Rate W2 Current Rate W2 Current/Proppoosed
gal summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter
L
0 $10.25 $10.25 $9.50 $9.50 7.891 7.891
2,400 14.05 14.05 13.00 13.00 8.08 8.08 I
51000 17,85 17.85 16.50 16.50 8.18 8.18
5 ~ V
100000 23.45 25.45 23.30 23.50 9.30 8.30
12,500 29.25 29.25 27.00 27.00 8.33 8.33
151000 33.05 33.05 30.50 30.50 8.36 8.36
17,500 36.83 36.83 34.00 34.00, 8.38 8.38
20,000 40.65 40.65 37.50 31.50 8.40 8.40
25,000 48.25 48.25 44.50 44.50 8.43 8.43
35,000 63.45 63.45 56.50 58.50 8.46 8.46
40,000 71.05 71.05 65.50 65.50 8.47 8.47
45,000 98.65 78.65 72.50 72.50 8.48 8.48
500000 86.25 86.25 79.50 79.50 8.49 9.49
558000 93.85 93.85 86.50 86.50 8.50 8150
60,000 101.45 101.45 93.50 93.50 8050 8150 i
65,000 109.05 109.05 100.50 ,100.50 8.51 8.51
70,000 116.65 116.65 107.50 107.50 8.S1 8.51
f 75,000 124.23 126.25 114.30 114.50 8.52 8.52
800000 131-83 131.85 121.50 121.50 8.52 8.52
83,000 139.45 139.45 128.50 118.50 8152 8.52
90,000 147.05 147.05 135.30 135.50 8.52 8.52 P
95,000 154-63 154.65 142.50 142.SO 8.53 8.53
100,000 162.25 162.25 149.50 149,SO 8.53 8.S3
110,000 177.45 177.45 163-50 163.SO 8.53 8.53
.120,000 192.65 192.65 177.50 177.50 8.34 8.54
i~.. 130,000 207.85 207.85 191.50 191.50 8.54 8.54
140,000 223.05 223-05 203-50 205.50 8.54 9.54
Block Charge .
w Proposed Rate R Summer Winter Sumner Winter
Customer Charge 10.25 10.25
First Block 0 0 1.52 1.52
Second Plnrk 1,52 1.52
i
r
111'
1d ;
r r,
as ~ .
P,
-'S1
k
6
EXHIBIT A V-5
City of Denton Water utility
Resale Bill Comparison I
Current Rates vs Proposed Rates
3
City of Denton Water Utility
t• Billed Billed Proposed Rate W3 Current Rate W3 current/prorieed
gal MGD Demand Summer ppo~
' winter Summer Winter Summer Ni
rater
rrrr rrrrrrr rwwwrrr rrrrrrr wrrrw--
A~. ~ 2370700
' 13,4180000 8940533 $22,924 $21,390 $16264
2470000 9,516 $29,516 13,409 11#734 - 7.174 -28,$,11
r 29.03 18,91
d~ 813031000 359,800 111117 11,147 12j953 11,362 -13.95 -1.89
60766,000 3160200 9,492 9,492 10,447 90311 -9.14 1.95
7,429,000 371,000 10,774 10,774 11#306 10,179 -6.38 5.05
8x994,000 394#300 12,133 12#133 14,090 12,292 -13,89 -1,29
' 7446000 487#300 12,709 1
8,930,000 483,300 13;517 13,517 13oflS 30,337 -8.61 22.94
9 2,206 3.
35
.'I. #572000 483 10.14
. ,700 13,921 130927 13, 04/a 13,072 -1.12 6.54
21#824,000 657,773 24#431 24,431 35,260 29,612 -3001 -17.50
16397400 890#900 24,742 24,742. 26,305 22#286 -5.94 11.02
r ,
Y'
L
s
F
.
4
j 1,
tM r
1
7r
r, .
`r't Block Charge
Proposed Rate R Summer Winter Sumner Winter
a+a' Cuetomer Charge 157.89 137.88
First Block 0.63 0.63
1G.UU 16.00
_ "~x~tx.♦ ,7. rJUr .r'>., . an '.u.a fael~Wyl..::(kria?
l
nix
kfi.
Pi
t;.
eef ,
t
Rate Cowparlson Exhibit M 6-5, Pale I
Asia Sohedel• ---.present Relk---- -.-.Proposed Palo.... -•-Caewshla---
Sum$I wialor swiwer INIAW
I.. Resldsillisf aearics (R-11
y Cuslgonor Facility Charge 16.60 15.60 06,50 16.60 No file thesis is proposed,
Energy Charfe 0.0465 0,1416 0,1116 011466
R4aldehifil Service IR-31
Crreaaewf Fetiliiy~r Cbsree 06.60 01,60 06.51 16.60 No rile chaste Is proposed,
4 90440 Chiffl - 161 block 0.0516 0,0616 #.0646 0.1616
Insley CAarfe • Ind block 0,0115 0.0146 4,1116 6.141E
r, Geastil 3sirlee 1o61
Costs" 1 fkclllty charge
alsole F1fee 110,00 ito,00 111100 010.14 Rats redaetlon Is rovvesed.
Three Ph1 N 16,04 16,10 16.40 16.60 Oeellaino a6 rgy O40CM 10illeled.
Oosusd ChI ;r 6.10 1.40 6.16 6.16 First 6 or$ aol Gilled,
Ivor
FIIsYIChIsr:°rji•
, 0,03SS 0,0565 I.IT60 0.016
Second bock 4,4366 0.1316 1.6266 1.6366
Aoalril 4er e'PriTery 16P1
Coildsood = Illy charge 11136 111,60 116,06 04S.I1 Rats redM61106 10 propo6d.
Dewsad chi ;r 4.56 4.11 $.16 6.16
poorly Chi if 1.0326 1.6336 1.136 0.0104
1
5= Laree prewar, 1111
CNI r Fstrllly Cheri* 141.61 111.6,6 146.11 146.00 !1844 redsalloo Is proposed.
9oMSAd Charge 6.11 1,10 else 1.16
1061oy Char•~s 0.630/ 6.1311 1,636 0.6aff
least tleir,6 timr1n1*1411
CYi~or1( Fecrii y 06010
sole pfi a 110.6 016.6 116, I1 010.11; Rota r4ddatloh le prsP0040,
1bfsa Phil* If, 14 16,11 16.6 16.11 y
Osdie6d Charge 1,00 0,11 4.6 4 6
Iurgy Charge 0.1311 1.4361 1.133E I.IW y
F «.~.M.,. W.
1
.
' Allt Coagsllso4 EtAilil V 9-6. Fsga 1
Global 114hling 1021 6 Dusk-to-Down tlghtlal 10-D1
s" 111146001 Pals••- ---proposed
Mls••-
aa ••.LI k1 lyp1--- -02. DD.
lo" $01 to Vapor , 01.10 06.30 S4.68 06.11 lints (010911106 Is proposed.
16l1rFy 10dlwe vapor 1.10 6.30 6.60 6.10
40 $041 we Vapor 1.10 10.11 6.26 hfb
If141xM a19Yfr vapor 6.06 6.16 6.39 6.74
SSW Mofeely Vapor 6.13 1.16 1.16 1.14
, 110Mf hilwvVvapor IS.3O 14.116 14.16 10.60
1(efli11 6106x1 119h116g (03)
k0. EsOrgy Aall 0#1 kWh 10.1110 10.0410 No rate change 10 proposed.
•--pr0u4l Asia •---proposed R01e••-•
A1411 19,FII 1 tilhling IAF) -$mw W14lsr luaolar Wistol
Cost F 91 is Charge
AlalrO F Ire 121.00 416.00 120.10 121.10 Alto ladu9lle4 Is proposed.
16116 phile 10.00 30.00 $0.01 31.04
EA1+f9A,Cka11e r
011 Pt' Period 0.0110 0.1116 0.0316 1.1314
m for, `14116d 1.0120 0.1120 6.OF49 1.6140
0114 ,1eon
of( FI, Period 0.1414 0.0010 94316 6.1116
p~ Fet I#rlod NIA MIA MIA NIA
I)eri1/6a Chs. ;e
psO 81a;:1
0)I fst period 11.10 11.00 01.69 41.06
04 peak Period 4.19 4.10 0.64 4.64
r : all 1191 1#11064
to OpsisOfilled 1.00 144 I'll 1.66
ti
' 11611018eo Wolshlp lislrl9o IRW)
.pretest Rate ---fropeed Pals-•-- ,
Crulems Picitrlles Chails •00amr W1611r tl0ess0r Violet ,
Vdol# this $111.1141 116.14 11to 11) 114.11 Pill 1164141 blilisa ' Foo KWH 4.6366 c ii ii 146166 1.0161 Firllsi/ ylrl~aago 001 billed11otN.
easily C6afp+ 106 KIM NIA NIA 4.1121 1.1321
Diease C6s►pr 1.21 1,36 5.111 6.16
11
Mt x ~
.
I. _
i
i
F-
a.
EMhlbll Y 8-6. Page 6
" Teegselry Ierrlas IT11
1- •••Ifeaeal Ralf. ----Proposed Rate••••
Coolemor Fpcllitia6 Charp4 •Summa l Vaster summer %later
$tells Phase 111.00 110.00 111.00 610.01 Rate MUCI oe It Proposed.
These Phase 15,00 15.11 15.01 16.11
Easrgy Charge 0.0670 1.1170 0.0160 1.1161
sisadby Service ISPI
Firm As Available YnIC
Clalomar Fact title* Charge 145.00 115.10 116.10 New fall Schedule.
040066 Charge 0.16 1.17 4.16
E. E401liy'charge 0.0600 1.0110 0.1100
Yr,
T11N 61 Use ,eoefal service (T01
F1e1111ii 'Cho III Present Proposal I Proposal a
16116 phs:t 120.40 110.00 11/.00 Froposkl I provides lot sa McColl
b1~4 Phbe+ 60.00 11.01 60.10 the board raduollsa 14 the TO rate
astral to the 1e404116A IN the as
Eare fj~1 chile role. No eboagas to the lime
Hof !6160", peflods.
10.0100 11.1654 10.tgp6
pa'ik He.rt 0.0!00 1.1175 0.0460 Proposal I ellmisalee TOU damsad
fr Off lark Se1;'. 0.0360 1.1115 N/A 4har6sa led $arrive Ike 644#11k
peeled to beers sadl6 11:-11:06
D64ise1 CAerge weekdays sail weeksll ales,
Ildao"
40 040101. 10.16 01.10 NIA
l ~Il poak h:,•S 1166 3.64 NM
t Of /s6k bu 1 6.40 0.64 N/A
m;
.
r
t i
.
Ve ~ '
+c
-....«..rs . µ.r. o-u........evd.rW.>M:'1..L'Mti nID./W.JWN M1/.MWA~1~'~.~•~
.sue "...en
.
c"'a
iy
,
t{
t
N, '
4
r
. „~s..t!Nw
Ties of Use = Primary Suvteo ITPI Exhibit V page s
Pressal Proposal 1 Proposal 2
Facility Charge 110.06 100.00 100.00 proposal 1 provides lot so across
the board tedaetloa to 1%$ 10 call
tesrl Chorea equal to The eada4lian is the 06
r, k rate, we Chenf*$ to Ike time
pass Sasses pollade.
Fisk Moore 10,0100 10.6Il6 60,1100
r; CII Fisk Hour@ 0.0100 0.6300 1.116 proposal 2 eliminates TCU dowered
t Oil Palk 116180a 0.6300 0.0361 NIA charges end hallows Ike on Oak
period to basis sodlh 12:01 •11;00
' .
N Cb eA o $64604 $64604 18' weekdays and wookead 3eye.
r,
2 peek Hoets 11.16 IO.so NIA
Off rook Hours 1.16 1.ts NIA .
Oil peek Sesroa 6.40 6.26 NIA
.L
TO* Of Use rtlldoallal Service ITRI
~r proposed
Rate
Ca4loMt Ghar:t 1110.00 Nc time of use late was previously
Really Ch$too
elk Mavis 1.!126 offered residential toheumeca.
Cpl peak H!Its 1.6100
lotarroollllr its IPII Plaeont Poo coed
pa4lfliY Cap ;r 141.50 145,10 Afl* I911Y01100 le pt004641.
deergy coal; 1.1104 116311 Claoooof from LF loo m1~ 0arsv
Ounu CAar1r 6.10 4.61 14 411111481.01. The diiCdynl from
' The01'b~ed chaflo is laarsased
i;
t o,
f
,
a
u
*-q4 f
EXCERPT
MINUTES OF
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING, December 16, 1986
3, RECEIVE REPORT ON ELECTRIC, WATER, AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY
Wagner reviewed the recommendations of his firm's study as
t, stated in the Executive summary portion of the report.
l Wagner emphasized the proposed 'Utility accounting Group'
due to the need for detailed plant and expense information,
and load research data, for future ratemaking and planning
purposes. Wagner proceeded to expand on the need for a
comprehensive customer load management and research program.
It was the opinion of his firm that a load research program
st.ould be instituted for both water and electricity,
" requirellthatncefforts be maden in order of to ay effectively
a monitor the results.
According to Wagner, out-of-period adjustments applied to
sales and revenue for the water and wastewater utility
should be closely scrutinized and documented to show when
they occurred such adjustments should then be 'normalized'
for load research purposes.
Y' Wagner also stressed the importance of tying fuel costs
more closely with fuel revenue recovered to insure that
revenues are matched with expenses,
The results of the rate study also encouraged the use of
demand side programs for both water and electricity, The
h, water utility was advised to consider charging for fire
protection, or alternatively$ charging a one-tire impact
fee for fire protection to offset the significant costs for
firs protection provided to the public, Nelson advised
e~ against implementing any such fee regarding fire protection,
The Board concurred stating that it was the traditional
F position of the city to provide adequate fire flow without
assessing a special charge,
Wagner stressed the need to implement a plan to compile
necessary data to meet DUCT and TWC rate case filing
r, requirements. Data icurrently available is insufficient to
meet these commissions' filing requirements in Wagner's
estimation$
Thompson asked how expensive it would be to implement these
- recommendations, Wagner stated that in his opinion the
load research program and the data compilation program to
most FUCT and TWC rate case filing requirements would be
the two most expensive items to implement, Facilities and
resources are currently available to implement the other
recommendations,
Nelson agreed that load research was probably the most
expensive item to implement. Tying monthly fuel factor and
F adjustments to revenue is already being monitored, The
Board felt opposed in principle to the expensive collection
of data which may or may not be necessary,
cYy ' t. kt~WY..[N.y.-n ( 'a.. ♦ q,a n't iiI
aL ,n
r
b
i
Cry, ~
V
Wagner reviewed the funds available after return for the
water and wastewater utilities. The proposed water rate
increase will affect the 15,000-20,000 gallon per month
customers the most, smaller users will get a 7.91 incr*ose
versus the 9,51 increase proposed for the larger users such
as heavy lawn irrigators.
Coble reviewed the impact of the proposed new rates on the
various electric rate classes, he average electric rate
decrease will result in a net of 115 per year. The average
proposed water increase will be a not of $18 per year. The
verage 'customer's net bill will be up between 500 and
' 1,00 per month.
Boyd asked about the religious worship electric class
(RN). Nelson explained that most customers with higher l
load factors will have lower per KWH charges.
Coomes recommendod additional study for the proposed
utility accounting group. Ceomes also desired further
} study into what needs to be done in terms of equity
regarding the religious worship rate, ;
Thompson moved to approve the proposed new rates as
presented, 9oyd second, All eyes, no nays, motion carried
M unanimously.
,
r.. t
yak
d ,
I
i
i
3
I i
i
i
R'
r '
I V .
Y
L'.
y. X
1
r `5
r+ °
F 1
i
1'.
aa~ J
T -I IT
Y
P
~ "~(/y ~6p'A+h'+d.M Jn.w..Tyrc..f w•err.
P'j {
r
1
1
5
'^t
i DATE: February 31 1986
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
t "
t,_ { SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RATES
i FOR PROVIDING WATER SERVICE BY THE CITY TO ITS
CUSTOMERS
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting Of
January 14, 1987 recommended approval of the water
tM, rate revisions submitted. by Management Applications
consulting.
~r SUMMANY/BACKGROUNII:
Management Applications Consulting, Inc. (MAC was
retained by the City to conduct a comprehensive rate
study of the Water rates. The recommendation is:
1. No increase in Wastewater rates
2, A 9.54 increase in Water rates
(a) 9(1) 7~.9% to average 10#000sgallons/month age increase to customers
(ii) 14.64 to larger 30,000 gallons/month
' customers
(b) 8.451 average increase to commercial/
industrial
' b (c) 9.261 average increase to sales-for-resale i
The Executive Summary plus selected exhibits of pro-
posed new water ratea, water bill comparisons,
proposed new electric rates and selected electric,
water, and wastewater financial pro forma 'B, are
included with this Council agenda item. A complete
set of rate study work papers are available in the
~r. Utility Administration office.
i"
E
h
l
C
e
G
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Five percent (5$) of the water rate increase is
ti required to meet 1487 budget iexpenditures. 'Four and
one-half percent (4.51) of the increase is to sid in
building a reserve to pay the annual $1,800100) debt
service on Ray Roberts that will be payable in March
of 1988. Another 12 to 151 increase in late 1487 or
early 1988 will also be required,
_ PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
,
Citizens of Denton, City of Denton Municipal
Utilities, City of Denton General Government.
b Respectfully
r submitted:
Lloyd Harrell
Prepared by- City Manager
r l
Nelson
E Director of Utilities
r Approved: / "ell
RTE, Ne sot+
Director Utilities
Attachment l: Rate study Executive Summary
2: Projection of Revenue Requirements
~Y 3: Exhibit V A-21 Current vs. Proposed Rates
4: Exhibit V B-5, Rate Comparison
f 5: Minutes PUB, December lb, 1487
s 4
0286n
c •I
r p.
e
' rtyw.w....»... .w wa.,. . c ....:w s7M 4!c«:.,,w x,.. .y.,a;.Yk.WW.d ♦'rJs!M9'*"`y
I
I
q
0900L
i
R NO,
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING NEW RATE SCHEDULES FOR WATER AND SEWER
e" SERVICES PROVIDING FOR A SEVERA9ILITY CLAUSE? AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
t,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, RER:'SY ORDAINS: !1
f
SECTION I. j
3
that the Schedule of Rates for Water and Sewer Service, as
provided for in Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances, are hereby
' established ae follows:
F~
WATER RATE sCEEDOLES
w PAGE NO.
W1 Residential Water Service 3
W1N Residential Water Service
Not Connected to sewer 5
ti Nil Religious Worship Water service 7
W2 Commercial/Industrial Water Service 9
' W2A Commercial/Industrial Water Service Aster 11
` W2N Commercial/Industrial water service Not w
l Connected to Sewer 12
W3 water 8614 for Resale to municipal Corporations
1 Water Districts a Other Governmental Entitles 13
by Agreements Prior to June 1, 1986
W3A water sale for Resale to municipal Corporations {
Water Districts a Other Governmental Entities
P By Agreements After June It 1986 15 ~
W/ antra-Governmental sales of finished Water 17
WS Reserved, 19
r W6 Intra-Governmental Sales of Untreated Water 20
W7 Standby Fire Service Water Line 21
¢ .Fx Wa Extra Jurisdictional Residential Water
service 22
W9 Extra Jurisdictional Commercie/Industrial
' Water service 23
W10 metered Water from Fire Hydrant 25
t
PAGE 1/WATEA i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
c
VIA, V> n.
I
!
7
i
k SEWER RATE SCHEDULES i
S1 Residential sewer Service 26
SIR Religious Worship Sewer Service 28
S2 Commercial/Industrial Sewer Services 30
f` S2A Commercial/rndustrial Sewer Services 32
S3 Wholesale Sewer Treatment Service for a
" Governmental Agency, Division or Subdivision 34
$4 rntragovernmental sewer service 36
SS Sale of Treated Sewer Effluent to Municipal E
Utility Customers 38
~qv S6 Metered Sewer 39
37 Residential Sewer Service to Users Outside
' of Denton Corporate Limits 41
M Be Residential Sewer Service to Users without City
of Denton Meter Service 43
89 Commercial/industrial Sewer Service outside
the City of Denton Corporate Limits 44 `
SID Metered Sewer Outside City Limits 46
a. ,
1 i
yYf
I IN
1~n
r ! 1
R
SSSyyy[/ 1 1 {7I
y
1 9(
{{Sw l
ry 1 Y M1f
V ,
PAGE 2/WATtR L SEWER RATE OADINANCR I ~
s0 . i ~r°h4 h~'F ~ . , '.m.ai ➢+..s, A~.' . . , iri+Jp of L+`#A1,.:.NikLdwi: .
t
rc
R
i
SCBEDOLE Wl
RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE
APPLICATION
Applicable for single family residential service, and indivi-
dually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities
with less than 4 units.
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tempo- j
E€'' racy, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with i
1J applicable rider.
L 1 I
s NET MONTHLY RATE WINTER SUMMER
Billing months of Billing months of
i. MOV, through APRIL MAY through OCTs
+ (1) Facility Charge
sx. 3/4' Meter 5.00/30 days 5.00/30 days
1' Meter 5s75 5,75
1-1/2' Meter 9.00 9.00
x 20 Meter 410.00 410.00
(2) Volume Charge
0-15,000 gals 1.55/1000 gals 1455/1000 gals
150000-300000 gals 1455/1000 gals 2.05/1000 gals
Over 300000 gala 11655/1000 gals 12.20/1000 gals
MINIMUM BILLUA0
Facility Charge Facility Charge
PAYMBNT
y,~ v bills are due when reederad, and become past due If not paid y
~w within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES 1
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
trq'';: customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
x ' special facilities eider. j
i,
Y
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
' (a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
F billings annually.
i Formulas
1 z Actual days in reading period x customer charge
x 30 days
W.h
PACE 3/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE I
~ i .r'. r ka ti t8
. , . - . « . _ y-. Via' :~•w.
• •a
.
n
1
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per
111 month to determine the million gallon consumption to be
4 charged to each rate block.
k
t Formula: }
' Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
r !
h
V
a
1P
w .c
V4
r
f~ rf
i
i
t
PAGE 4/WATER I SEWER RATE ORDINANCE `
r °r
SCBEDULE W10
lr
RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE NOT
` CONNECTED TO SEWER
APPL r^ATION
- Applicable for single family residential service, and indivi-
dually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities
h,r with less than 4 units, where the metered water is not returned to ii
A 3 the wastewater system for collection and treatments i.e., lawn I
sprinkler or septic system.
t ',l 1
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to
temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction
L` with applicable rider.
NET MONTBLY RATE WINTER SUMMER
Billing months of Billing months of
~w MOve through APRIL MAY through OCT.
(1) facility Charge
3/44 Meter. S.00/30 days 5.00/30 days
1" Meter 5.75 3.75
1-1/20 motor 19.00 19.00
2' Meter 410.00 410.00
(2) -1olume Charge
0-15,000 gals 11055/1000 1.55/1000 gals 1.55/1000 gala
15,000-30,000 gals 1.SS/1000 gals 2.05/1000 gals
Over 30,000 gals gals 2.20/1000 gals
c MINIlrJ!1 BILLING
s j is
" Facility Charge Facility Charge
4a r
PAYMENT ~
Bills are due when rendeced4 and become put due if not paid
' within 1S calendar days from date of Issuance with a S4 late penalty
ta assessed.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special ftcilitioa in order to most
i
`custow's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider$
v„
s i
4. A
PAGE S/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
.o r
yep
0
ay _ _ .f
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
j
Formulat r
Actual days in reading period x customer charge j
` 30 days
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per ,
r. month to determine the million gallon consumption to be
charged to each rate block,
Y` Formula
" Actual days in reading part od x CAL in rate block x RATE per
sP~ r 30 1,000 gallons in rate block '
r r. _
e~y
>
~rrrF 41 a a
r
t
t
1
5 r r '
> PACE 6/VATBA i SEMEA RATLO ORDINANCE
6 i~ ~b.w3.,:•c k11.s1~+"AIP dM
a ,
ArY d1
r P
3
SCHEDULE W1R
i RELIGIOUS WORSHIP WATER RATE
t
APPLICATION
Applicable to all facilities used primarily for religious
worship, served by a single water service line through one meter,
i
Not applicable for resale service in any event, nor to M
{ temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction {
with applicable cider. i
v ~
NET MONTHLY RATE WINTER SUMMER j
> 1
Billing months of Billing months of
d' NOV. through APRIL MAY through OCT.
a (1) facility Charge {
' 3/41 Meier 15.00/30 days .00/30 days
F~ 1• motor 5.75 5.75
s 1.1/21 meter .00
29 Meter #10.00 010.00
12) Volume Charge
0-15,000 gals 1.55/1000 gals 1.55/1000 gals
15,000-300000 gals 1.55/1000 gals 2.05/1000 gals
Ov!r 30,000 gals 11.55/1000 gals +2.20/1000 gals
x '
s' MININUK BILLING
i Facility charge facility Charge {
A PAYMENT
9r Bills are due when rsnEeredo and become past due if not paid T
r} ;_,k within 15 calendar days from date of issuance-
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which re`auire special facilities in order to meet
cuulomer's aecvice requireeants shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION Of UTILITY BILLS
4
(a) Billing for the facility charge shall be based on 12
billings annually.
formulas
Aotual days in reading period - x customer charge
a 30 days'
? i >i
.j r
7 _
r
R.
PAGE 7/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE -
~r f ...yr4a•d3.ac:'HClc.F.s.i'yj~'r;9:#.M#. ,
tr
v,
t
a
Nv
(b) 9illing for the grater used shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the million gallon consumption to be
charged to each rate block.
> Formula
x
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
F 1
l 4 ~ w r
x
4
rr l J H
6
r
fir .A
r ~
4y ..o-
'
M
1
t
\.i std e
t ~ 1
r S;
4. "T
+ { FAGS $/WATER i SEWER RATS ORDINANCE R`
! p r ,
Y'
'
~1 J
o _ r l
a 4
M ry,
j"I
j SCHEDULE W2
j COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE RATE
APPLICATION
Applicable to all commercial and industrial userss or other i
water users not otherwise classified under this ordinance. For all
Y water provided at one point of delivery and measured through one
`r meters
Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to
temporary, standbys or supplementary service except in conjunction
with applicable rider.
' NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) facility Charge
3/4' Meter 10.25 per 30 days
l 1' Meter 1145 pet 30 days
I}, 1-1/24 Meter 14.25 per 30 days
d 2' Meter 16,25 per 30 days
3' !later 4805 per 30 days
4' !toter 62.25 per 30 days
6' Meter 105.00 per 30 days
Meter 119.00 per 30 days
(2) Volume Charge #1.52 per 1000 gallons
N MINIMUM BILLING
.II
facility Charge {
ioh PAYNNNT
bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
1; f within 15 calendar days from date of issuance with a 94 late penalty
asaessed.
.r ` SPECIAL FACILII'IE8
r, d
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
i customers service requirements shall be provided subject to the
{ special facilities rider,
PR4R11TIOM Of UTILITY HILLS
(a) billing for the facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
formular
aka
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
" 30 days "F
S S •3
~d
6t.
PAGE 9/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
,
i
r M i
t, L
_ r
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month
to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate
f ''I block.
i Formulas
Actual days in reading period x CAL in rate block x RATE per
j 30 1,000 gallons In rate block
L Y Y
l[ t
r yY:
r Y ~
PAGE 30/WATER, SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
g 4
pr..Y . ,a.=.zY:ro+: Y~tr:.;Faa •_„s,.. .,.,..'+...~r,t.,+r-r.r,l+k.yy.yk)Mv'k~^"t
r
x
G i<-
a F
y,
SCHEDULE W2A
q,
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE METER
USED TO DETERMINE WASTEWATER VOLUMES
f
APPLICATION
I
r
1 Applicable to all commercial and industrial users, or other
water users not otherwise classified under this ordinances For all
water provided at one point of delivery and measured through one
meter to be used in determining wastewater volumes only. (See S-2A
for volume charges)
`U Not applicable to resale service in any event, not to tempo-
z rary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with
applicable rider.
MIT MONTHLY RATE
facility charge
3/4' Meter 30.35 per 30 days
1' Net ~r 11.25 per 30 days
1-1/2' Meter 16s25 per 30 days
01
2' Meter 16635 per 30 days
? 3' Meter 16.75 per 30 days
6' Meter 82.25 per 30 days
F I 60 Meter 1105.06 per 30 days
so Meter 119.00 per 30 days
:v MINIMUM BILLING
,
Facility Charge
+I zr~ 4
^ 9 1 1j YMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid X
within 15 calendar days from date of Issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
tic All services which require special facilities in order to meet
.r customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
`a special facilities rider.
Y; VAMflog Of UTILITY BILLS
billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually. Formulat
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
L r 30 days
.~4 t
-PAGE ll/WATEA i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
fyj
I
I
SCHEDULE W2N
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE
NOT CONNECTED TO SEWER
d '
j APPLICATION
Applicable to all commercial and industrial users, or other
j water users not otherwise classified under this ordinance. For all
4 water provided at one point of delivery and measured through one
meter where the metered water is not returned to the wastewater
system for collection and treatment: i.e., water used in production j j
or irrigation or where wastewater flow is measured separately. j
F Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to j
temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction ;
' with applicable rider. {k
NET MONTHLY RATE E
(1) Facility Charge II
3/4' Meter 1D.25 per 30 days
- 18 Meter 11.25 per 30 days
1-1/26 Meter 14.25 per 30 days
2' Meter 14.25 per 30 days
3' Meter 48.75 per 30 days
*a yf 4' Meter 82625 per 30 days
s' Meter 105.00 per 30 days j
8' Meter 119.00 per 30 days
r t
(2) Volume Charge 1.52 per 1000 gallons II
a MINIMUM BILLING F o-'
a '
Facility Charge
s PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid E
a within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
F
~.r., SPECIAL FACILITIES
G?; All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requiremsits shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
t annually.
Y
Formulas
mar ~ ~
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
w t PAGE 12/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
k 41
k
Y4 i,.: .'s,er r. e.... ''}a yr...na . , n.,vr frUnw.•...~'LFr /''~`~GPTI
~ a
SCHEDULE W3
a 1
WATER SALE FOR RESALE TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS.
WATER DISTRICTS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
PRIOR TO JUNE 1. 1986
z
APPLICATION
Applicable to all water sales contracts with municipal corpor• i
t~ ations, water districts, or governmental entities made prior to June
1, 1986, for the purpose of providing water for resale to the public.
Not applicable for temporary, standby, or supplementary service
except in conjunction with applicable rider.
syy NET MONTHLY RATE WINTER SUMMER
Billing months of Billing months of
Nov. through April May through Oct.
tL (1) facility Charge #150.00 #150.00
(2) Volume Charge 01.35/1000 gals. }1.35/1000
,x gallons, up to
3,000,000 gal-
Iona/month
,la #1.65/1000 }
gallons, over
3,000.000 gal-
i1kr j Ions per month
&& MINIMUM BILLING
1 4150.00 per month
PAYMENT
( Bills are due when rendered, and become
f past due it not paid ~
` within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
"customer's Service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider.
a
PAGE 13/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
d~
x'
i
J'
f WAIVER OF SUMMER BLOCK
Any contracting authority under this schedule may have the
upper summer block waived by installation of water storage capacity,
sufficient to provide for its finished water needs during times of
maximum demand on the City of Denton water system and not taking
water during such periods,
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
(a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on twelve (12) "
billings annually. !
i )
r
" Formulas
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
r 30
PK" (b) Billing for the water used shall be baud on thirty (30) days
per :month to determine the million gallon consumption to be
' charged to each rate block.
,a
k, Formulas s
Actual days In readiaa Period x GALLON in rate block x RATE per.
;j
1,000 gallons in rate block
Vg ~
~ V.
C
PAGE 14/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
P t"
~f ro si J , I o ~ per`.
AMMON
SCHEDULE WA
r WATER SALES FOR RESALE TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS*
WATER DISTRICTS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
BY AGREEMENT, AFTER JUNE 1, 1986
APPLICATION
Applicable to all water sales contracts with municipal corpor-
ations, water districts, or governmental entities made on or after
June 1, 1986, for the purpose of providing water for resale to the
a4 j public.
r Not applicable for temporary, standby, or supplementary i~
service except in conjunction with applicable rider. !
, fff x r.'
r NET MONTHLY RATE
I) Pacility Charge #164.25
2) Volume charge # 0.63/1000 gallons 4
Gp:
`Sq
g 3) Demand Charge # 16.00 per month per 11000 gallons
MINIMUM BILLING peak demand
$164.25 per month
(plus demand charge based on the
higher of contract peak or actual
peak day previous sure rents for the
period, June through
September.
. DEMAND CEARGE
Shall include all contract
peek day usage requirement in accordance '
with the peak day estimate provided no later than one hundred twenty
o (120) days prior to June 1 cf each calendar
(12) month year for next twelve ;
~ period of actual
u . • peak day demand measured for the
customero whichever is higher and shall continue for twelve (12)
calendar months, In the event that measured peak day consumption
exceeds the estimated peak day consumption, the utility will bill
_i the customer for excess measured peak consumption ha^k not prior to
j February 1, immediately preceding, or to the first date the customer
received water service under this schedule with the City of Denton,
Texas, whichever to Jess. Peak day usage shall be the highest
measured usage in the twenty-four (24) hour period measured by the
`City of Denton Utilities, or the calculated peak day usage provided
the City of Denton Utilities, Whichever is higher.
i ;
PAYMlNT
Bills are due when rendered and become '
past due if not paid
within fifteen (15) calendar days from date of issuance.
{
PAGE 15/WATER a SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
t ~
tam. ~ tfi:
y SPECIAL FACILITIES
i
All services WWch require special facilities in order to meet
j customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider,
y ,
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS I
} {a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on thirty (30)
'i day billing periods, all billing for periods great.+r or less
than thirty (30) days shall be prorated for such greater or
lesser billing period.
rormulae
Y' M
Actual days in rA ding period x customer charge
30
%
r'. (b) Billing for the Demand Charge shall be based on thirty (30)
day billing periods, all billings for -*riods of more than or
lose than thirty (30) days shall be prorated for such greater
or lesser billing period
formulas
r Actual days in reading "clod x Demand x Demand Charge
30
I~ t
c 5
a "h lei y
rai5,f,e
a
i
I'~. i
i~yt ~~112":, nE'~
a 3 ~
PA0M 16/WATtR i SEWER RATS ORDINANCE
~14' `'1 `
..7
. Mt.dfr:r'{Yxia ,m,,ay A 1~#v',a~+aF+i~~,r* rvw.+
e '
r§ I1 ' ~
a
Y A ~
SCHEDULE W4
f INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL SALES OP FINISHED WATER
APPLICATION
it
i
Applicable to sales of finished water to all City of Denton
{ Departments and accounts supplied at one point of delivery and
measured through one meter.
I
Nov applicable to resale service in any event$ nor to
temporary, standby# or supplementary service except in conjunction
' with epplieable eider.
NET NONTBLY RATE
(1) Facility charge
3/4' Meter 10.25 per 30 days
1' Meter 11.25 per 30 days
1-1/2' Meter 14.25 per 30 days
2' Mater 16.25 par 30 days
3' Meter 48.75 per 30 days
40 Meter 81.25 par 30 days
s' Meter 105.00 per 30 days
Be Meter 119.00 per 30 days
(2) Volume Charge 1.51
par 1000 gallons ~
I
MINIMUM BILLING
facility Charge
' PAYMENT
Bills are due ahon rendered, and become past due if not paid
vitkin 15 calendar dap from data of issuance.
SPECIAL PACILITIES
{`r `I All servlces which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requiromonts shall be provided subject to the
spacial facilities rider. :t
PRORATION OP UTILITY BILLS
ti
(a) Billing tot the facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
<1 lO 1, :a r annually.
.I
formulas
w yti,. 1. i
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
,c• 30 days
a 4 f -
a b fR 5 `
4 v.
'k V"
* PAGE 17/WATER s SEWER RATE 014DINANCE
y aa3
J
t f
9
1.
(b) 3illing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month
► to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate I,
{ block,
Formulas
Actual days in reading period x GAL to rate block x RATE per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
1 r {
1 ~ t
I t .
l1 t
Y J
In ,
y 1 I ' .
ti r
t t ~1~
far aJl y f' 1
t Wt ',1+ ~ r!7
r 1
< y yj IIII N~
t r' I
J rl
1
c ~s q
S r Y}
'I~t ~ tl ~ 1, ' Sw
z'tift ~ 3 ^ ti' ;d
JdV~ Y.1 }2 1
fit V.
f J t
Y ~ 11JI J
%
pAOt 18/NATtB i 9EkkA RATE ORDIMANCR
PO'
7
c
a~ 1
r,
`y SCHEDULE ws
e ,
s ;
='I[~ RESERVED I
x;4
l ±
xl
1.
♦ !7
ryLr' a e , ~ $~i ~f
t
1 ~
41
~ ,44r,
t ref , S
M r ti
xi r~
1r .
~ x.
f'
T
M
k a1
r
r 4c1 r ; 4110E 19/WATER i SERER RATE OADINANCE °f
,74
~ r ov
^>qf f 1 :t►. ...~rn.. w..P,..._. ~ _.»....f~~;rs~Y.+3«... yiM4tixt.rrl.rsa......., - u:.:.~nfY1R+~4°9p r~ ~
xdj~7r ~ ~ Y r
1 41 "1
~n N
SCHEDULE M6
K
i' INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL SALES OF UNTREATED WATER
a ~
f $ APPLICATION '
v Applicable to all City of Denton Departments and accounts for
j untreated water supplied at one point of delivery and measured
through one meter.
oot applicable for resale except in cor;unction Ath `
applicable rider.
a
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge 108.15 per 30 days
(2) Volume Charge 41.00 pet 1000 gals.
~y 1
MINIMUM BILLING
#108.75 per 30 days l
d.
a J PAYMENT
t'F Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within
15 calendar days from date of issuance.
r SPECIAL PACILITIE8
All services which require specir,l facilities in order to most
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special
• , facilities rider.
xr PRORATION Of UTILITY BILLB
g {s , r 4 , (a) Billing for the facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
~ annually. ~ .
formulae
5
4
Actual days In rasdina period x customer charge
«'y 30 days
(b) Billing for the water-used shall be based on 30 days pot month y
to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate
block.
t{ formulal
Actual days In reading period x CAL in rate block x RATA pot
xf.1h 30 1,000 gallons in rate block a
' i
PACE 20/WATER a SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
A
f
SCHEDULE W7
STANDBY FIRE SERVICE WATER LINE f
k APPLICATION
i
Applicable to commercial and Industrial users for unmetered
i - fire service water line to serve only sprinklers or other private f
rf fire fighting equipment.
Ir j Not applicable for resale in any event.
Mr NET MONTHLY RATE
Facility Charge i
` 6' Line 14.25
` S' Line 21625
Y. r
MININOM BILLING
a
yrt!
Facility charge
X, , l
PAYMENT
bills are due when rendered, and'become past due if not paid
' within 15 calendar Jaye from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES
I, r All services which require special facilities in order to meet g 41 e t Vr customer's aarvice requirements shall be provided subject
to the
special facilities rider, '
PRORATAON OF UTILITY BILLS '
fa1 Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 11 billings
annually,
,t.1* Formulas
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
rq
A
I.
T N
PACE 11/WATER 6 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
I }
~j
5
T9
i l......' 1. 'r ..:L
SCHEDULE WE
EXTRA-JURISDICTIONAL RESIDENTIAL WATER CUSTOMERS
r}. APPLICATION 1
~e4 ! Applicable for tingle family residtntial service, and
individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family
facilities with less than / units outside the corporate limits of
F tAu City of Denton.
III
r° NET MONTHLY RATE
WINTER SUMMER
t
8111inq months of
Billing months of
Nov. through April May through Oct.
f (1) Facility Charge
3/10 attar 7.30
I' Meter 605 7.30
r 1-1/2' Meter 6.75
3050
Mater 16
.00 13.30
? X13.00 I
( ) Volume Charge
0-13,000 gals 2037/1000 gals
15,000-30,000 gals
2437/3000 gala
Over 30,000 gala 1277/1000 gala #3.01/1000 gals
2.77/2000 gals #7.70/1000 gals
n MINIMU1 M a~NG
y
'T Facility Charge
P YMINT
31119 are due when rondered and become
past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days lrom data of issuance, i
SPECIAL FACILITIES ? f
y, rr:
g All servlces which require special facilities in order to stet
} customer's Service reQUirlments shall be provided subject to the
special facilities rider,
y P1tOlUtION OF UTILSTY 9TLLA
~ .w CIS Y, '
(a) billing for the racilily charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually,
rormu is r
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
Y
47 t " 70 day!
(b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days par month to
r~
detetmine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block,
.y ~ Formuler
t Aclual days i
n raadfn br sr(od x CAL in rate block x RATE par
31) 1#000
PACE 22AATER E SEWER FATE ORDINA CEllons in rate block
`n+l
~ _ _•ry,.^• .;N,ULu„a'"4.ia Piece
. ',ry
s SCHEDULE W9
EXTRA-JURISDICTIONAL COMMERCIAL i INDUSTRIAL
I WATER SERVICE
I APPLICATION
Applicable for all commercial and industrial users or other
S, 3 users not otherwise classified under this ordinance outside of the
' =7 corporate limits of the City of Denton for all water service pro-
vided at one point of delivery and measured through one meter, (W-2
rate times 150%)
Not applicable to temporary, standby or supplementary service,
i except in conjunction with applicable rider.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge
d!. 3/e' Meter 15.50 per month
1' Meter 17.00 per month I
1-1/2" Meter 21.50 per month
.ti. 2' Meter 21.50 per month
30 Meter 73.25 per month
1" Meter 123,50 per month
60 Meter 1157.50 per month
6' motor 178.50 per month
i
: (2) Volume Charge 02.28 per 1000 gallons
MINIMUM SILLIMG a"
Facility Charge
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
c , within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
y aPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to most
customef6a service requirements shall be provided subject to the
spkial facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
t~i,6Y is ,
(s) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
r r r fl:,
w, y
.r
h,{
' PAGE 23/WATER a SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
A` ` f
i
E,
Formulai
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
' 30 days
1b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month
to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate
block,
r
Formula:
r Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
tip: c
S
u' e
!
4
y
' 'k,
T '
1n 1~
Y
a 1 ! ~
PAGE 74/WAIER k SEWER SATE ORDINANCE
Loot 1: K t.
LL.
I t
I
SCREDULE W10
METERED WATER FROM FIRE HYDRANT {
e' APPLICATION
t, 3
+ Applicable for all water taken through a fire hydrant or other
" direct distribution line source at one loW ion for private or
commercial use not associated with fire fighting.
DEPOSIT
err #650.00
4 '
a
' User shall place a deposit for each use of each of the City's
urt hydrant metorlm) needed. Deposit to be returned when rotor is
returned and final bill is paid.
r. NET RATE
' Volure charges #1.65 per 1,000 gallons
r~ Volume use shall be computed by subtracting the motor reading
at time of customer paying deposit and receiving meter from motor
reading upon return of motor times any applicable multipller.
FACILITY CEAROE
#17.75 per month
INSTALLATION CROON
rti t i` 't ' I -
+41.30/meter/installation
PAUSN'T
Bills are due when rendered, and bocome past due If not paid
within 15 calendar days from data of issuance, f
r s
s tI~
a
ff I i.
i
" PAGE 25/WATER i SEVER RATE ORDINANCE
. r ~'.AsL,A,Iw:^~~.'Ial.iAweKkMMa'
r
y
H
SCHEDULE S1
~ i
RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE
1
APPLICATION
Applicable for single family residential service, and Individually
metered aprrtments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less
C r than < ur.;(s,
' Not applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by service user
in any event.
NET MONTHLY RATE
1) Facility charge #3.00 per month
2) volume charge 41.50 per 1,000 gallon influent
Billing shall be based on ninety-eight 1900) percent of water consumption
but shall not exceed a maximum of twenty-live thousand (258000) gallons,
Monthly billings for the period March through November shall be based on
the average monthly rage of water consumption during the immediately
n prior months of December through February. Billings for the months of
December through February shall be based on actual consumption. New
residential customers who do not have a lull prior non-irrigational
history (December through February) will have a maximum bill based on
ninety-eight (901) percent of water consumption or ten thousand (10,000)
~sS gallons of water consumption, whichever is less until a non-irrigational
water consumption history to established,
MINIMUM BILLING
'zo;~ facility charge #3.00 per month.,
PAYMENT
Bills are duo when rendered, and become past due if not paid within
i 15 calendar days from date of issuance with a 51 late penalty assessed,
z' SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities In order to most
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special
'tfacilitio■ rider.
i
'r 1
~ I
, J
9 ~ e ~ 7 i .M
PAGE 26/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
n" r
i
s PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
A) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings }
annually.
t 1
Formula:
' Actual days in reading2eriod x customer charge
30 days '
za b) Billing for the sever effluent shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
rate block.
a formulai
Actual days In reading period x GAL in rate block x RATe per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
a
fd ytiy r `
r
n
w. {
kf~ erg i.
" 1" a a*, 'y'am
r
r
Or PAGE 27/WATER i $MR RATE ORDINANCE
i.6n4kTNMMikahiM4e.Ae+r°'L7A'!✓ "
91
v
♦,4 t
F
a
,
y
;y P
i
SCHEDULE SIR
E
P.ELICIOUS WORSHIP SEWER SERVICE
i
APPLICATION
Applicable to all facilities used primarily for religious worship and/or
education and not for residence or commercial or industrial enterprise, i
D;at applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by service user
Fn any event,
NET MONTHLY RATE
I
11 Facility charge 43.00 per month
2) Volume Charge $1.50 per 10000 gallon influent
Billing shall be based on ninety-eight (991) percent of water consumption
but shall not exceed a waximum of twenty-five thousand (23,000) gallons#
monthly billings for the period March through November shall be baled on
the average monthly rate of water consumption during the immediately
prior months of December through February, aillings for the months of
December through 1,brusry shall be based on actual consumption. New III
residential customers who do not have a full prior non-irrigational
history (December through February) will have a maximum bill based on
ninety-eight (981) percent of water consumption or ten thousand 1
gallons of water consumption, whichever is less until a non-irrigational
water consumption history is established.
MINIMUM BILLING
43.00 pot month
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within
15 calendar days from date of issuance with a S1 late penalty assessed,
SPECIAL FACILITIES
+ l
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
' Customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special
facilities rider,
V PRORATIO
-_N OF UTILITY BILLS
-
hlK
a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
3 b'
N ~ 7
1.
i YY ir1,
n ,
PAGE 28/WATER i 8l4E'A RATE ORDINANCE
"11
1 ~
( I ? a 1 9
r i M'W.1,.,.,:.M a...4., ..,bw.fa~s.ii sun........ ,.ten Am.ge%a
u
Formula)
a Actual days in reading ~eriod x customer charge
30 days
i
b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
fate block.
r'~a Formulnr
Actual dais in reading Period X CAL in rate block x RATE per
30 1,000 gallons in tat* block
a}
I~
rW ~ V
11~ ~ y
t j ,Y ~y
r .l y' J >n, s,l
e
if r Y
4s r.t~
x ,
r f
PACE 29/WATSA E BENSR RATS ORDINANCE
y v.~>u+~64s.NM1 W' ...,.....w..✓:'.i!i#vcCaiA4~~'4R!!4'i~M,~i'NV'{'•f
~ e
OY .,1 } 1`~ ~ AA~
1 1
w
V
SCHEDULE 32
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SEWER SERVICE E
APPLICATION
I 3
{ Applicable to all commercial and industrial sewer service users and to
all sewer service users not otherwise classified under this ordinance. I
Not applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by service user ~I
in any event.
NIT MONTHLY RATE
4
1) Taeility Charge 46.50 per month
3
21 Volume Charge }1660 per/1000 gallons ti
Billing based on eighty (60%) percent of monthly water consumption.
INDUSTRIAL BURSMI
in addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial,
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcbarge based
' on the following formulas
t Cu-VU (IBU-260) B ♦ lea-26)) 8))
Wheret Cu is the surcharge for User X*
R V'j is the billing volute for use: xs
1 Bu to the tested SOD level for user x or 260 "/1#
whichever is greaters
a SOD par 1x000 gallons (0.000690) is the unit cost
YI.
factor for treating one uaita
8u is the tested as level for user x or 260 mg/1,
whichever is greater.
0.000546) is the unit cost factor for treating
B (
one unit of so par 1,000 gallons.
t MINIMUM BILLINO
46.50 per month
m YNINT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within
15 calendar days from data of issuance with a 61 late penalty aaeaesetada
dt •
A ? ° SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to most
customer$s service requirements shall be provided subject to the special
x` facilities rider.
lyV;
PAOI IO/WATER i 82WER RATE ORDINANCE
"r ,..„...awo~;..ej`4hKi~'T+✓,..w: . . w!4 tiNWdrilbn',~''14~r
t
e
Y
! - 1
it]
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
j
a) Billing for the facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
t,
Formulae
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per
6r'• = month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to eacb
rate block.
Formulas
' Actual days in reading Period X CAL in rate block x RATA per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
fl.
w
w
IJ f u,
2. ry•
i
.i
~ 4 r 1 f
4
' p 1 1;
C
PAOA 11MATER B BENAR RATA OADINANCA
r.aixe"wir ".r.,rr,w €r~ge+:'..riWUw~~"`
Fair "
i
i
i
SCHEDULE S2A
COMMERCIAL i INDUSTRIAL SEWER SERVICES
APPLICATION
Applicable to all commercial and industrial lower service users and to
all sewer service users not otherwise classified under this ordinance
Whole waste is measured by a meter dedicated to water which is returned
into the wastewater collection and treatment system.
Not applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by service user
in any event.
I^
' NET MONTHLY RATE
l) Facility charge #6.60 per month
2) Volume Charge 41.60 per/1000 gallons
Billing based on ninatY-e! ht (901)
4 percent of monthly water eonsumptlin.
INDUSTRIAL SUROHARGS
In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial;
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based
on the following foraulaf
1r Cu■vu ((SU-260) B 1 (Su-260) S))
w3 Mhordi Cu to the surcharge for war x.
Vu is the billing volume for user X,
,a Bu is the tested SOD level for user X or 260 mg/Is
whichever is groatar,
a BOD per 1,000 gallons (#0,000590) is the unit oast I
~a factor for treating one unit.
I,
Su is the tested SS level for user X or 260 mg/l, ~
1 ' whichever is greater,
S (40,000596) is the unit cost factor for treating
one unit of SS par 1,000 gallons,
d 'MINIMUM BILLING
a• I
ry #6,SO per month
~vM PAYMENT
A, Bills are due when rendered, and become past due It not paid within
r 1S calendar days from date of issuance with a St late penalty assoseed,
gyn.
PAGE 32/WATLR i•S1W9R RATE ORDINANCE
t
1 1
i.
SPECIALIAL FAQ
t All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall to provided subject to the special
j)
facilities rider. ,
PRORATION 0Y UTILITY BILLS
r a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually,
x+ Yormular
, do s in reading period x customer charge
Actual
30 days
yr ; w b1 Billing for the saver effluent shall be based on 30 days par
Month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
rate block.
~s
Forsular
r ; Aetual days in readin2-M iod x CAL in rate block x BATB Per
r r 30 10000 gallons in rate block
4 4
14,
0, 1
c
P .c
41'
l
r
x:.14
pp ~
u~ I t
A I
C T:
G
ly
PACE 33/NATM LSE E PATE OP02NANCE ww.~ :vrw+r
j
~ r
,r
' 1 1' 1
E
SCHEDULB 83
WHOLESALE SEWER TREATMENT SERVICE FOR A GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY. DIVISION OR SUBDIVISION
APPLICATION
4 ± Applicable to aay municipal corporation, or other governmental agency or
subdivision which operates a sewer collection system and contracts with
the City of Denton for sewer treatment service.
,a
NET MONTHLY RATE
! 1) Facility Charge 0125,00 per month
2) Volume Charge 41.56 per 1,000 gals. of effluent
billing shall be based on one-hundred (1001) percent of actual gallons
measured by meter at one point.
,i
NINIXON BILLING
f
#125.00 per month
{ IroubTAIAL BoACBARGe ;
' In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial,
y~ A there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based
on the following formulae
+ Cu-Vu ((Bu-260) 6 4 (8u-2601 81)
`i whetu Cu is the surcharge for user Xe
tti, Vu is the billing volume for user X.
Bu to the tested DOD level for user X or 260 mg/1,
whichever is greatere
b' B DOD per 1,o00 gallons (;0,000590) is the unit cost
.yl factor for treating one unit,
a
-If 8u it the tested 88 level for user X or 260 mg/1,
whichever is greater.
+ S (#0,000596) to the unit cost factor for treating
one unit of 98 per 1,000 gallons,
K
PAYNDNT
sills are due when ~ rendered f and become
past due if not paid within
1S calendar days from date of issuance with a S1 late penalty assessed.
i a'1 n.
~ H
PACE 31/wATER a SUER RATE OADINANCE
r
h
SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special
facilities rider.
't
4Y
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
0 Billing for the facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
a
" Formulas
` i Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
b} Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
rate block*
t ,ir Foreulas
' Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate black x RATI per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
r
1
* r f> -
i
a
r F'
M1J !
M1 1
1 , rr 1
I
4 ,r z yM TK
k PAGE 35/NATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
1 ,y
'..-....rnrisw:eM'9Uwa...~...rw .,,acv.- ~tR~t'4~dldf:Aha+W Vw/, t
x ,
M ~
11 rf f1
r
SCHEDULE S4
` INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL SEWER SERVICE
f f
! APPLICATION
r Applicable to all City of Denton Departments and agencies for all newer
xx ' service.
x.
NET MONTHLY RATE
1) facility charge #6.50 per month
a'
2) Volume charge 1.60 per month
♦
$ s Billing shall be based on eighty ($0a) percent of water consumption.
rs` 11AUSTAIAb 81JACMAAOE
M In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial,
m that* will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based
on the following formulae
Cu.VU (IBU-160) B + (8u-260) e))
wherei Cu is the surcharge for user X.
Vu Is tte billing volume for user X.
Bu is the tested WD level for user X Or 260 mg/lo
whichever is greater.
Lj~ ' B DOD per 1,000 gallons (40.000590) is the unit cost
factor for treating one unit.
d`, q so is the tasted 88 level for user X or 260 mg/l,
whichever is greeter.
8 (#0.000596) is the unit cost factor for treating
r; one unit of aS per 1,000 gallons.
4r MINIMUM BILLIMO
N f i • f..
$6.50 per month
PAYMBMlf
c
hw Hills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within
: 15 calendar days from data of issuance with a 51 late penalty assessed.
t BPICIAL FACILITIES
All services which require spacial facilities in order to inset
customlar!s service requirements shall be provided subject to the special
` facilities rider.
h 1. PAOF 16/WATER i SMA RATE ORDINANCE
of 1
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
rormu)ai
r Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
r r' r
b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
rate block*
r ;
formula$
Ir 1 ° .r
Actual days in reading period x G" in rate block x AATt Per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
6V
.I
I
rr ~ ,?1Tya n f 1~ ~n
1~ 1
It I
1 r M `y 3
r L,ft ~ ~
TTY
trt~y
A f~
r. e
I ,
1 d ~u t ~lf
tY
ICI i.
14
r 1f L,
cC~ x f~j '4
rr. ~.ja~ 11'
f ~ r
N r r' ,L
s
P yI
' •TLA A MIR AATB OADINANCt
C ^w
y ';p'[~W'.'",.•......
~+yf it
t
f 5 0
i
j •
ANA
T
5
1
SCHEDULE 35
ff SALE OF TREATED SEWER EFFLUENT TO
MUNICIPAL UTILITY
CUSTOMERS j
APPLICATION
Applicable on tales Of treated sewer effluent to any municipal uti2lty,
hM ' Not available for resale in any event,
NET MONTILY RATS
t 1) Frclllty Charge 97.00 per month
2) volume charge + ,76 per 1000 gallons
MINIMUM BILLING
yt
l
'A 1
#97.00 per month
~ ~ J '';~YMQPl'
I9 BllU .are due when rendered, and be'"s past due If not paid within
calendar days from date of issuance with a Se late penalty assessed.
r y`'
SPECIAL FACILITIES
xt All Services which require special facilities in order to meet
facilities service
facilities rtdec, requirements shell be provided subject to the sp*61a1
1101A0► UTILITY
illingpfor the Facility Charge $ball be based on 17 billings
pJIIr' a) B
al,
I
N,'r
Formula
Actual days In reading period x customer Charge
r 30 days
•f
f1, b) Billing for the sewer effluent shill be based on 30 days par
month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
rate block,
Formulal
Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per
' u 30 ip000 gillond in rate block
i
r•
PAGE 30/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
Y r.
bat r y• 4•h~ML.-.
IF •
SCMEDDLE 66
METERED SEWER f
APPLICATION
Application to any sewer service customer desiring to meter all
sewage net monthly rate effluent from a single customer location and not
otherwise classified under this ordinance.
NET MONTHLY RATE
facility Charge #110.00
f Volume Charge 41660/10000 gallons
INDUITRIAL SUICNAROE
in addition to the above charge for com arcial and industrial,
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based f
:f on the following fggmiulsi
A b<, CuwVu ((NU-260) E ♦ (8u-260) 811
t'' wherei Cu is the surcharge for "at X.
Vu is the billing volume for user X.
Nu is the tasted 001) level for user X or 260 mg/1,
i % whichever is greater.
8 NOD per 18000 gallons (00.000590) is the unit cost
a factor for treating one unit.
8u is the tested 88 level for user X or 260 mg/l,
whichever is greater, 1
, 111
3 8 (#0,000396) is the unit cost factor for treating f
i one unit of 88 per 1,000 gallonss
MINIMUM BILLING
#US,oo
PAYKINT
Bills are due when rend4redo and bacon pest due if not paid within
~13 calendar days from data of issuance with a S1 late penalty asseased, l
i
8fec1AL QILITIEE
k. All services which require special facilities in order to most
customerts service requireaents shall be provided subject to the special
facilities rider,
: ^
PAON 39/KATER BEWER RATE ORDINANCE
m
y
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
t annually.
rormulat
r
F Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
a
` b) billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per
month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
A` + rate block,
h tormuIai
Actual days in reading miod x GAL in rate block x KATI per
a` 30 10000 gallons in rate block
1
f'
1 t is
M
r
5 r
i 1 14
.s '
C°
c¢ ti
PALS 10/WATtN i SEWU AATIE OADINANCe
1 r
-.,,.,...:wrwwsr+. rv,r r.p.epw-. . -,,•v. HVaWrtc ++lnSa<Yls 4fM~NW1+'"'r
~ i I. •~a.SIdJWIMS,nsMw..nr a,r.«...,.
r ,
Fix r
r
y,
i
SCHEDULE S1
i
1 RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE TO USERS
OUTSIDE CITY OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS
APPLICATION
Applicable for single family residential lower customers individually
metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less than 1 `
units outside of the corporate limits of the City of Denton and also receiving
water from the city of Denton.
NET MONTHLY RATE
1) Facility charge 01.50 per month
2) values charge 02.25 per 1000 gallons of effluent
€ billing shall be based on ninety-sigbt (gat) percent of water consumption
bat shall not exceed a maximum of twenty-five thousand (25,000) gallons#
monthly billings for the period Notch through November shall be based on
the average monthly rate of water conewtion during the inowdiately
riot eontbs of December through Februarys billings for the months of
December through February shall be based on actual coosueptione New
residential customers who do not have a full prior non-irrigational
t~ history (December through February) will haw a maximum bill based on
ninety-eight (001) percent of wafer consumption or ten thousand (100000)
gallons of water consumption, whichever is less until anon-irrigational
i'
water consumption history is established.
4;; R MINIMUM bILLINO
E
1.50 per month
z
FAY ENT
~p
bins are due when rendered, and become past due it not paid within
15 calendar days from date of issuance with a 51 late penalty assessed. ,
is SPECIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to Rest
customer's setvice requlrodents shall be provided aabjoet to the special
facilities rider,
i „
V ytit y. i.~,
A PAGE 41/WAT9R 6 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
yea.,
i
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
V annually,
a
Formula:
n a Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
jkr b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per
,y month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
rate blocks
I,
Formulae
'r Actual days in reading period x GAL in rats block x ItATe per
30 1,000 gallons in rate block
F
i
a
/k/ a y
{
i
VD.u q f
b
` PAOC 12MATtR i SMA Me ORDINANCE
~"S l ,.•.mw,++.±w. .....y.......15,ddA',~NIIRu.*twxi'1MwAtl+e
lea
T I
SCREDULE S9
P.,'"3NTIAL SEWER SERVICE TO USERS WITHOUT h
CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE
APPLICATION
Applicable to all residential facilities not also receiving metered water
service from the City of Denton, including sub-divisions, for apartments$
mobile home parks, or other residential Service users, The monthly charge
will be based on the maximum number of residential units in the area
served during the month times the Volume and facility charges.
NET MONTHLY RATE
In Corporate Outside Corporate
U nits Limits
w. Facility charge #2.25 per month 3.35
' ~ p^.r month
2) Volume Charge +1.30/1000 gals. 42025/1000 gals.
Volume charge will be for five thousand (50000) gallons per month.
MINIMUM BILLI*Q
` # 9.15 per month/ #14.60 per month/
per resident unit per resident unit
s ; f'~ PAYMBNT
~M
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within
' 15 calendar days trom date of issuance with a 51 late
penalty usused.
A SP=CIAL FACILITIES
All services which require special facilities in order to meet
customlerl's service requirements shall be provided sibject to the special
facilities rider,
PRORATI(N OF UTILITY BILLS
J` a) Billing for the facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
Formulae
Actual days in reading period x customer charge
30 days
b) Billing for the saver effluent shall be based on 30 days par
mbnth to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each
rate blocks
aR .t .
4 a4 Formulae
' 113
a Actual days in reading Deriod x OAL in rate block x RATE per
30 11000 gallons In rate block
PACE 43/NATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE
f
1
I
SCHEDULE S9
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SEWER SERVICE
OUTSIDE CITY OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS E
f v!~
APPLICATION
Applicable to all commercial, industrial or any other facility not
otherwise covered under this ordinance outside the corporate limits of
the City of Denton and receiving sewer service from the City of Denton. k
I II
NET MONTHLY RATE ll
1 ~
e" 1) Facility Charge 49.75 per month
21 Volume Charge 42.40/1000 gals.
Billing based on eighty 1801) percent of monthly water consumption.
a INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial,
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based
on the following formulas
Cu•VV 'IIBu-260) D 4 (Su-2601 ED
Where! Cu is the surcharge for user X.
Vu is the billing volume for user X.
r Bu is the tested DOD level for user X or 260 09/10
whichever is greater.
B DOD pat 1,000 gallons (00.000885) is the unit cost
a factor for treating one unit.
eu is the tested as level for user X or 260 mg/1,
' - whichever is greater.
(0t4000896) is the unit cost factor for treating .l
one unit of 88 per 10000 gallons. E
MINIMUM BILLING
' #9.75 per month
T~ 's P YM NT
Bills are due when tendered, and become prat due if noh pkid within s
~`\f•,~',. 15 calendar days from drite of issuance with a 51 late. panaity ashased,
V SPECIAL IACiLITIIS_
hit services which require special facilities in order to meet
customers-service requirements shall be provided subSeot to the special
facilities rider.
wx' f ( PAGE 14/WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCC
o
k[~s
x
6 !
5 4.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
a) Billing for the Facility charge shat! be based on 12 billinga I
annually.
d j Formulae
l yj
y ! Actual days in reading period x customer charge
I.
30 days {
`r y l 1
mss.;
q.
1 !
It ~ !
1-0
r err : ~ ~ ,
µ {
~,I al, X11?- .y ,
~ FJt r,l '1 ~fY lrS
a',a - I{
fie!
s ` .
i~9 ,Y(1j ,
,e~e>
f }{e'
14
4 !
! e
Ib
4, 1 n
I, PAGR 45/NATeR i ORWIN RATS ORDINANCi
! 3
R
!
V
, p w 1 v
SCHEDULE SID
CC METERED SEWER OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS j
3
APPLICATION
"Y ApplicatiGa to any sewer service customer desiring to meter all
sewage effluent from a single customer location and not otherwise "
classified under this ordinance.
r NET MONTHLY RATE
r .
ilk-
facility y,° M~ Charge #195.00
volume Charge #2.4011,000 gallons
INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE
In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial,
there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based
' r ? on the following formulas
Cu-Vu ({Su-260) a + (8u-2601 8))
Whores Cu is the surcharge for user Xe
Vu is the billing volume for user X,
Su is the tested SOD level for user X or 260 mg/l,•
whichever is greater,
a
800 per 1,000 gallons (40.000885) is the unit cost
y
factor for treating one unit.
M r 3 ` 8u is the tested 88 level for user X or 260
whichever 1s greater. /1,
8 ($0.000816) is the unit cost factor for treating
one unit of 88 per 1,000 gallons.
MINIMUM SILLINO
p ri 4195.00
~ P Y MT ~ „
sills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within
15 calendar days from data of issuance with a 51 late penalty assessed,
.r ,
PACE 46/WATER 6 SEWER RATE OPAIMANCE
1
' .ek °ar@iye lpkiy}6"2ti•H•. v4 s,-- c:.~a.r ~y
J
" u
j
SPECIAL FACILITIES
t All services Which require Special facilities in order to meet
customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special
- facilities cider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS
t a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 17 billings
c annually.
Pocmulet
rr-
Actual days in reading period_ x customer charge
30 days
b) Billing for the sever effluent shall be based on 30 days rolr
1 month to determine the gallon effluent to be 0barged to each
rate block.
fi
Formulas
`a asap Actual days 30 reading Period x GAL0in4rate blockrx RATS per
Ip0 in 1 block
lY 1
r
ur
AN'
f:p L f
k~ :u
rf
RYi +
$Ax i; PACT I1/WATIR i SMA RATS 0151MANCI
',1y ~ w'M.iYJM1JP ✓Y..+YP,N,, •w........ • .xu W.r yy~ y~.~l
Ms. Phoe
~ tt
r yy
t. SECTION II,
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause,
^ phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any i
person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of }
V) competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the
` validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the }
` City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it li
would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such
' invalidity.
` SECTION III,
That the Schedule of Rates adopted by Articles II and III of Ordinance
5a4 No, 84-137 shall continue to be effective, charged and applied to the last
-4, regular billing cycle which begins prior to March 3, 1987.
4A: SECTION IV4
` That the Schedule of Rates herein adopted shall be effective, charged and
' applied to the first regular billing cycle on or after March 3, 1987.
PASSED ANf APPROVED this day of , 1987.
RAY STEPEENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTONe TEXAS
~4 y
ATTISTi
M .1
i k JENNIFER HALTERS
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Y'o
APPRoVSb As To LEGAL FORMI
0SOA ADAM DAAYOVITCE, CITY ATTORNEY
g CITY OR DENTON, TEXAS
.~7 0
<s ,
,
v, PAGE 48/HATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE i
14;
,a,...«.+..r _ ~...........a.. xa,s.w,waro ...,.......reMP.Fw.nv+Bl:es'RW7Ar S'i~
r
era, , ,A
~r
F w
1
1
ATr,~Cf!~JFXI 1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMBARY
n
j
t GRNXRAL BACKGROUND
Management Applications Consulting, Inc. (MAC) was retained by
the City of Denton, Department of Utilities, to conduct rate
review studies for their electric
i , water, and wastewater
utilities. The Utility Department has performed rate studies
previously, both in-house and with outside consultants, MAC has +
~f
attempted to build upon the techniques and procedures used in
i
these prior studies to develop an overall evaluation of utility I
rates, short tern financial
position', and long term revenue ~
requirement trends. Our findings area
1. The wastewater utility will no need a rate change tot j
x" the coming fiscal
year, nor is it likely to need a rate
increase through the fiscal
triad ending 1969. The
caveat to this finding is that when iia1
year 19x6 ~
" revenues are finally audited and normalised, that there f~f
will be no significant impact on the overall debt f
w coverage ratio or funds available for a
on investment. P yment of return
a
2. The water utility will have a shortfall in fiscal year
f 1987 which to likely to continue through the fiscal
d.l period ending 1989. Rate relief is needed to meet
short tats fiscal year 1967 revenue requirements and
will be needed again with the commencement of Denton's
Ray Roberts payments. The proposed revenue increase is
9631 for fiscal 1987.
most short term financial goals S1 is needed to
goals and 1651 is to be sp-
plied to future Ray Roberts payments, The rate study
Steering tomm)ttee aurooA khat this initial vase in is
r need(^1 ►o IwlIpM the ri}e Implo-1. of tin" 1,.1y 1!gb4rtG
S. , project. A mechanism should be estblished to apply
1
~t
P
t a
this phase in revenue to the future revenue require-
ments resulting from the project.
r The increase is applied to rate classes with the
4 1
philosophy of moving in the direction of equalised debt
coverage rates. Exhibit 1-1 shows the distribution of
the proposed increase among rate classes.
3. The electric utility will ace a decrease in the energy
i
li cost adjustment (6CA) for fiscal year 1987 and a cox-
mitment to cost con,,sinment will allow a slight
V'.
decrease in base rates, The overall ICA reduction of
24 will act as an across -tha=board decrease while the
;l base rate reduction of 3.26% will . be directed to move
toward equalising debt coverage ratios between classes,
The proposed overall rate reduction is 2.901 lahibit I -
y'
2 shows the distribution of the proposed rate decrease.
,
{ The overall financial picture for the Utilities Department Is I
soua5 and has been supported by continuous load growth and a
<<` strong accumulated reserve fund. Time of day rates have been
proposed on a trial basis along with wheeling, stand-by, and
cogeneration rates for the electric utility.
A separate financlal analysis was conducted for each of the
s>: y.VY utility functions. The results of these financial models have
been used to set the overall revenue targets for each of the
utilities. A detailed cost of service study has been conducted
for the electric and water utilities. These cast of service
studies have been used to establish class revenue targets and al-
" locate the decrease or Increase in rates to classes based on
' their respective financial performance. A detailed time period
,w
cost analysis was also conducted for the electric utility to es-
tablish the basis for the dp4...i„re n► of innovative rA~es.~ The
probability u( hi 'i'1,7) Vas 'itI Iir.,-1 111 lhir
detailed time period analysis. This approach has been used and
-2-
i
} c[.aA ,-'.,x:.,:.r ♦c .re r...'r. a's: t,~y,K.c;~'.,~ati4A+,~
lyu.rc.ws.,... - I
1
r.
EXHIBIT I-1
0,22-
Us- Wafer liab IMeMeee
i
02-
.i
Nlr bw+dby ;
0.16-
0.14
I
0.12 a w..
Can" %We a
K
f , o.oe
044
am
0
map Neese
Proposed Class ZRCre~s_
Residentlal - Average 9.85
Comaercial/industrial 8.45
sales for Resale 9.26
a
Pire Protection 18,00
Intra•Government
. Raw water 12.00
Treated water j
8.45 !l
Total Water system 9.50
a Osummer months only )May October)
j
j -3-
r
l~
~T
i
i
S
EXHIBIT 1-2 I
` 2 PropeuE GWde Pale OeawM C
1 i
c w ~
AI
-f RZ
_4 P. 07 0-0
oe
t . K e' e1
_7
. -10
fly Cl~u
Proposed class Decreases
Residential (R-1) I .
r 0.01
i
Residential (A-2) -0.55
General service (03) -4.09
Gan Serv Fri (GP) 5.77
Large Primary (LP) -3.28
Local Gov (01) -5.72
' Street Ltg 102) -3.11
Traffic Signal Ltg (03) 0.00
'$Dusk-tO-Dawn Ltq (D-D) -3.11
95n""
V,. Athletic field Ltg (Ar) •3.58
4. Religious Worship (AW) -3.87
Tempary Service (T1) -1.86
t.
*Summer ITU, ni Ir:
W ~ ✓ odrpa6iN G 71/e- EwfXl y ;'sr fJD~ asr~wEir•r F~ok/
i f/~'wN•~40'/Kw//
a
a
$
accepted by the Public Utility Commission of Texas in rate cases
for the state's investor owned utilities for many years, where
} possible, and where available data permitted, the studies have t
been conducted to comply with PUCT guidelines.
i
Throughout the nation, the utility environment and philosophy is
rapidly changing. Pressures from regulatory authorities and I
sconosic pressures for overall cost containment are forcing j
utilities to offer more services and alternative pricing I'I
strategies to meet the flexible needs of todayss consumer. Cos-
petition for new customers along with the need to keep existing
customers In a strong competitive position adds to this pressure,
These factors will force a re-direction 'in Tannin
p g, pricing, and
operating philosophy away from supply side projeati`(buildinq new
' plant) to demand side programs which offer customers a menu of.
services including conservation and load manageaent alternatives.
The first step is' for management, the board, and Council to
recognise this transition and adopt an approach which will ensure
,r a stable growth for the utility. The next step Is to dedicate
1 more resources to collecting, analysing and utillsing a full
. range of customer oriented data needed to deal with these coming
issues,
l
,Y
I
c,f I
IR y
e ,
S
K
~Nz
4
ATTACIUIENT 2
City of Denton Wstewter Utility pap 3 of 4
1496 Pate Oalgn Study i
Projection of Rovono Ravi, wento
Oescription rr 9.3045 rY 9-30.16 rr 9.3x17 fY 9-30.16 IY 9-X-11 f
I
Hletoriui~ Prgjeeted '
l I Total OperatIAO Expemn 11,114,660 $2,124,126 53,244,541 $3.365,376 13,641,439
Mal
2 Debt Serria 1,0181409 11121,510 1,093,791 1106411U 1,012,150
3 capital Adeitiem docent fulling 41,13? 70,592 10,1192 31,104 40,401
4 Ibt Uses 0 0 0 0 0
a 1x11
5 OtFw Ie01"m 52,6,!5 53,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
6 Nm-cow Ling Parents 143,619 361000 10,000 10,000 60,000
144111 Cah Rerente ilquiraunt $2,141,49 $3,236,91 54.211,14 14,341,1+00 54.101,190
6 feremt O&P N4 22.19! 31.301 ' • 2.V% 5.1%
9 last Dolt Sevin 51,OU,14 51,121,510 11,Op,14 51,04,143 53,01!,150
101"111 [*"Is won
Debt woomp on, V3 52,107,6" $3,1",310 53424,142 13.522,010
` Plus t
11 Intamt Paden of Debt 619.559 701,770 612,49 641,119 601,150
12 Dgnrlation Evem 706,145 166.141 74,141 111.145 1N. 141
r.
* 13 E1aalet Mmal Mvaru blulraant 3,015,521 3,915,563 4,SM,114 4,613,016 4,46,335
rt' 14 tw In 5erriee 531.919,101531,40,014 $31,931,161 531,076,337 132,251,922
15 last kcmlatW Depnciatian s6,64,112 $1,492,007 S1,211,152 51,9114,211 19,790.442
14 Plat UP bd ftaded 0 0 0 0 0
17 last Contilbutlom 14,910,970 14,910,570 14,910,5?0 14,910,570 14,910,310 l
11 &plot Post Plant in Senior 10,32216n 91921,446 61103,039 1,110,44 7,596,0
{ 19 0peretin6 Pis i at K,IU,93/ 54,977,130 561225,917 55.4117,216 SS,706,111
out AsIelu Grath NA 163,196 246,157 261.291 219,491
201x1 wo page NA 0.001 0.004 0.001 0.00%
21 Not 51114
X22 Mtwn (19)•(U) 51,191,407 11,401,607 WI'm 1414.191 S110.V1
23 w of Mbn (22)/(U) 17.42% 14.11% 1.11% 9.9% 10.0% j
24 Avg 16.11 W", Rete of Iktum 1152,135 S.M
ra 21 OW Coverpe Aatio ((19)•()))!(2} 7.43 2.54 1,19 2.05 Me
26 funds Ava11ab1e After Debt (19)•(1) s2,I6S,%2 $1,740,902 5976,611 11,117,316 11,102,51?
27 Return an Iftataent 491,700 453.239 415,100 465.100 49,100
24 funds Available After Return 1166110M k 211 663 41,718 . • 652.216 611,461
29 Uor%1ng Capital
30 Cat per kOD01a1 13945 1.31)0 1.3?31 1.37.12 113731
i
I
did0'fxtae _
l
4
5
City of Oonton YNtMttf utility Paps 1 of 1
Im A+M Q:YSgn !turfy
DNcri..ion FY 9-70-H • FY 4.30-!)
_ ~ Asran+ai s/,91T,U0 55,22s,91T
Operating Eapsnsss 2,121,126 7,2M,s/1
OtMr Aw~sw (N,000) (1A0,700)
y ~i iRli« 2,121,'710 I, ~1~
Capital Additions . 70.0 70.0
rk
± Aagrtt an Ittwatiae iii f2~1. ,
,~.r ~ 1lakin6 Gpital 0 0
Ml,111
Asssiittdsr 10,4113
IOOOPI soles 7,126 2,ap
mm
~1oooMl IflTSo
. 2t~t+w. {ot+arw)
l ,
F k
n
C
~ e.
i 1 + y
t. r
a a , {
r
a
•
r"dr ,
f
i
S
EXHIBIT 111.2 Pigs 1 of 4
City of Denton Water utility
1996 fate Design Study
RoMM Rpuirettmt Input Psr&Wgre
Description Fr 9.30.85 Ft' 9.70.46 It 9.30687 IV 9.3" FY 9•.014
Operating Expensest
Personal Servlees $1,110,924 111,470,413 31,701,945 $1,747.042 11,184,18!
(Capitalized Labor) (931902) (181191} (16,181) (378,010) (3n1400)
Supplies 201,118 212175u 272,!50 2751278 210,781
A+rrlwe Foray 657, 010 SM.464 011000 713, I50 911,931
1111ntenanoa 742 738,0 177,02! $a.m 1871471
Aft"A td Mir 1!!1000 112,100 1,13)1730
Services 71!1415 901,311 243,0 21!,130 2!013)!
Ins 8 &#Wry 22,00 25.08 37,00 301743 40,!37
Adds Trim (NsH-return or W) ON, IN 318181! 524,000
(D Caa►lftallew Cab) 5317!0 !81,308
(b410) (p,201) (q,20q (il,
,lq) (2!,10!)
` I,Ot2,03! 4,010,101 4,111,lM l,113,M1 !,~l,451
OOW Opnt6p ft araI r
rot Well
rat Used 0 0 0 \ 0 0
not Used 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Tara OHMa 2110707 210,000 400,000 1001000 400,000
( not wed 0 0 0 0 0
' rot Used 0 0 0 0 0
~a
Odw net wed 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0
_ :11,707 tlo,oo0 400,400 4ao,aoo 4oo,aoo
Nat-*mIng kmat
s Sale Of !trap 750 1,000 1,000 3,000 3,000
a Inumt lnma 1/V110 b01/0~0►0 83.0y00~ 243,0~00~ 2!),0,o
K ) 1 Misu 771) 2,{M/ 55,~ ",000 551000
M., ! rot wed 0 0 0 0 0
Aid In Comtewom 53,142 3,000 )1000 3,000 31000
Met wed
' 0 0 0 0 0
{ SuEtotal 3701124 618,000 354,000 351,000 351,000
Mir 110~ 1611
" ~ awl
w' W wN
not used
Dad Odds
Saito Mill Gal 3,452 31623 31806 )1446 4,156
1 ~
ft•, •
T
c:
k.:
t ,
1
E
w,.,... ..rr +Li-rr,..r,.' ~ . ,d Neavhpry3 duRSR,~it9.rida
,
x
x
t
Expense Growth. 19" 1989 peat 2 of 4
{ ptrwAl Services 5.004 6.001
Supplta 1.004 2.0%
Purchase power 15.001 25.0%
1 Helntamwe 1.001 21001
purditsed water 2.001 30.001
Semcas 1.001 2.001
ins i Sundry WO Trent (No -mturn or Debt) 3S-00t 2.00%
.001 4.001
lat Mvm* kam 3, Se1a arawtA
1W 5.001
190 5.001
!Sill 4.0%
Y ir~
n
r .
7 w
1
S r' '
11
hr r` . j r.` P
Kr
r ,
v'
4 1
i1 8 e •
j,~i u ` r,. w... ,.M.,_ .,-..s+r.'«,. 4o.M.u•.YM.rrav rr.1.-^.a'dY.s+t rp ~,::.a..ay o:.....«,..., .,,.....,„wn»r~A,w ~M~P@i6ViMSI~J~d .
r
,
a• ' .
i 1
1
t
City of Denton Water UliIIty Papa 3 of 4
1966 Rate Dalgn Study
PMJeotion of F*Yftm Rpulrwwts
F . Dasoription FY 9.3045 FY 9-3046 FY 9.30.21 FY 940.66 FY 9•)0.69
fW ......................................Historical.................... "acted
~i
I 1 Total opmthg Facprsal 51,012,035 11,000,602 14,M6,9N 65,!1!,699 15,132,966
Plus t
2 Daft Santa 1,015,05) 1,116,113 1,440,923 1,/11,IIZ 1,399,31! 1
s 3 by lobate payatants 0 0 0 t.i11,000 1,1!2,000
4 Capitol ANIHOM Cunvnt Futding 102,432 143,401 143,401 102,359 104,403
. Last
Otharkoft" 211,101 210,000 400,000 400,000 100,000
1Kin1 330,121 M/,OOD 364.000 354,000 361,000
7 I"',, Cash Aeom Mt♦lit of 64,M10740 11,117,016 15,429,116 17,7!6,051 14,360,111
1 lereant Cfrtya NA 4.501 1{.931 31.191 L161
! last 0sbt Swia 11,071,60 11,111,113 11,440A 11,416,412 S1,3M,3N
c: 10 IWAlit 9+yatt111 Worn
olbt towrope 13,572,016 13,3»,200 11,231,370 11,)50,151 S6,9N,111
Plus 1 `s
11 Intlr"t Postian of Dabs 167,163 1,011,113 1,0111523 1,016,M1 979,351
'oe
V .12 Ntrodotian Gpmae 513,232 $13,29 513,231 5:?,tit 513,232
11 iprlu AOrnrl Aavanus Aaluinartt 1,99,711 4191,441 3,106,121 1,410,1113 1,457,910
,k
14 Plant In We* 322,111,751 1?2,1N,* 1}2,901,1!1 323,001,533 113,111,917
t l5 taut kewletM
if 1444t Oontrlbatb iltian 31,799,005 fi,212,253 11,125,405 11,131,111 3!.151.911
1,731,001 l,110,M4 1,113,111 1,116,105 1,119,141
17 /lust Cwlp !00116 pim 0 0 0 0
Is 40111 Not Plant In Santa CAM 5,131,059 5,365,129 4,911,153 4,510,124
19 0"11V 11v4trte 11,493,240 35,403,231 N,7UM 16,056,211 34,291,539
0514 Rawtad irouth NA 99D,911 274,662 205,395 242,251
f 'y 201" we 0henpa NA 0.0% 0.001 0.0% 0.004
21 Net used
05 Aotwn 19)• 13)
~ I 0459,541) 3311,311 (331,233)(11,g3,M3)(52,159,421)
Z3 AW of AsNlrtt (2!)/111} .7.2% 1.90 •0.611 •:6.!31 .41,50
24 Aw 11.11 loan, lute of Iktum (31,339,132) .11.94Y
2S Oabt Cowrapa Attie ((39)•(10))/(2) 0.61 1.13 1.01 -0.21 -0.40
26 Funds Avallable After Oabt (19)•(1} (1154,509) 5636,215 111,599 (1117101411)(S210621 IN)
,r Z7 Aatum tin lmas4ant 292,300 266.116 214,900 142,450 142,450
' 26 funds Mr111llo After Aatum (446,109) 310,021 (196,301) (1,152,661) (2,204,639)
to A I(q Capital
)0 Coat p1r 100*1 1.3016 1+1154 1.5155 1.1166 1.5165
r
'~k. a :e..<,.n......-_ . • _ 'a~ i
i
.
L
city Of Oanton Weir utility Pap 4 of 1
19M ILG Dhi1n Study
FY 9-" F. .
0ncrtQtlan.......... .......0.~;
M~'MfINti7 t
' iS,493,211 iS,J1J,193
op.rstitq c'o 4,=,w I.M1,9p
otMr Iwv.Nw
tru,aoo)
Oak Woo 1,111,112 1.W.K7
Wtal Addition 1q,p1
14.1,101
t" Ikhn an km ant 2m,iN 2!1,100
ww tvq Coital
r 0
h
MwMder 210,027 {111,201) ;
' 100op1 blb ■
~ ~ It I, W 21101 .,Y'..
~ M
1 1/1000p1 1.7111 1.70
f
tkl'Ia11 (DOWN")
w r. ,
T `
r r.
yr J•;
y
S
l
d ,4
4
r4 i}
r
1 0,4
ODiINT 111.3 Page I of 4 f
City of Denton flectric Utility
1946 Rate Design StWy
Ran~,t kvireeent Input Paratttre
Description FY 9.3045 FY 9-30-66 fY 9.30-I7 FY 9.10.11 fl` 9-10-19
Operating Exptnsesi
hmonal Stmt 32,591,3111 f3, 632,611 31,631,000 K,169,900 55,!61,00 M
(Capital lied tabor) (366,025) (307,614} (10,000) (3101,400) (3112,0x) j
' SuppNts 231,15! 20,42! 371,000 311,160 311.116
Capeeity ration Of Nvchue POW 21, 23,139,610 24,4",060 21,111,11: 31,101,216
wined 50,314 M3,1M 1,211,000 1,3x,170 1,331,111
Wtel 219,614 /x,191 630,000 634,306 ill,,/
4a1i 6 &mmd;Y 140,331 150,0" !31,000 231,310 244,151
An Trani (lan.ratu,r, or petit} 1,267,116 1,314,411 1,330,000 1,311,300 1,100,21!
(a1lbNnd colts) (311,1q) (114,731) (k3t,000) (l33,32D} (331,90)
26,00,110 29,911,04 34,612,410 36,011,112 0,331,133
"wr Electric Rwanwei 1
} YN cawt3r 516,110 139,910 q,90 "~q,90 11,90
tb 1,033,!10 153,010 49,11M 479A 471,2!0
0 0 39,010 371,00 311,000
kw" "W Sa1« 3,112,470 2,573,910 1,29,110 1,1ft,1M 3,174,201
W
CM"Kt FM ww Sales Cate) (1,3M,3M) (1,531,411) (04,010} (1,072,30) (t,OM,4M)
• Mearwet IeK 141,000 1x,000 150,000 150,000 190,000
13 ,000 151= 1 s ,000 13,000 15,000
4 MMrW Ttaeperinl 0 0 0 0 0
200 4,000 3,000 3,000 31000
O*w a l 90,000 131,000 x0,400 100,000 140,000
3,667,932 2,3#,361 1,612,740 k,7l1,119 2,261,207
Non~eretiq A/rMw: '
" Sale of Screp $,000 30,000 5,100 5,000 $to
Ifft"t lnoe« 170,011 150,000 29,Ox 210,000 29,400
Mica 25,400 9,000 10,000 10,000
Ibust Mown 31100 1,400 2,540 2,600 2,500
Aid In C4netrW10" 14,000 «,000 15,000 11,000 15,400
" $M ies Center Ilent 164,341 10.341 114,110 164,M 164,M
( Subtotal 922,010 1,019,!41 466,M0 4M.W 46611110
Y
Dow Infon«tiont
Fwl+►YrctweMW 4Mr0Y 201103,1(0 16,110,NG 14,0011410 15,m,300 13,00,01
NWV PW Off sys"m Sales) (1,3«,)0) (1,!31,626} (04,00) (I,On,3M} (2,OM,4M)
ex w Fal t rlydw Peer [wV 19,41P,1t2 U,5M,M2 11,151,400 14,#9,931 11,561,101
Sala (MM)•1,o00
60,40 669,1n 102,631 131,162 761,213
x
J' .
I
it .
r.
,b .S.M. n i r
t
1
i
1 EILRNI Rev*" rrmrj Ppo I of 1
Hrwml Sault" ION Iwo ~
SwI lK 5.001 0.001
ODI
tool
CAWIty Fort fa, Of hrdLat pow
Il~frrtrwrc, ~ ts.aol ,
s«vlat I.ool 2.001
Im 1 wry I.0o1 2.001 I
Adoin Trim (Nm.rotum or odt) LOON 4.01
i
NO ftVWA CraRAj soles b" I
a
I9p 5.001
1511 S.001
` " 1511 1,001
RR , 1I
l I 4
1 M1I rj~ }
1 1 4 ! A r i
l
1
I
jy~' J`.'.try r
,y
s
41
i
X 1 iy,
aJ ~
k
yr) 1 'w ,.,..,~ya;9.eWuba.Ydw T✓,... ._,~n.,Wr«t5wrw
n}art S q
f ~
I A
I 1 e
f
1
City of Denton (lectric Utility cape 3 of 4
19M We Design Study
Projection of Rwe+w k4ufrwents
DescNptlan 1) 1.30-15 FY 9.3046 FY 9-30-87 sY 9.30-86 FY 9.10.69
Historiul "acted
1 Total Operatirp Eapos"Allss
Fuel 6 fRrcMse Er"
$26,016.090 129,963,924 334,662,0!0 376,011,112 311,136,137
Flat
2 Oelt $mice 2,951,120 7,3U07M 3,217,041 3,113,927 3,119,216
3 Capital Additiam Current futdlnl ISO, In 412 359
4 Not Use/ , !72,000 531,320 SY,OM
0 O 0 0 0
call
S Odw Electric kkwas 1,667,972 21381362 1,612,710 1,7S1,1M 2,211,107
I Non.Opsrsting AOVOA 911.010 1,019,941 411,N0 WIND 4N, N0
V, I !t Cash Arware Fee- dt Apuftaertt 3N,141,7M 930,78,372 336,2!1,!11 337,!10,731 944,312,98
NA 21.121 ILI% 3.30k 16. IN
9 Losi Osk We# ;
~',32,1!1.460 33,3U,7M 13,11u,041 13;ti1,l17 33,179,116
i
10 Egwlst bgwm le(ere i
D* Camp 321,18,136 $13.040.84 333,074,170 334,311.80 µ1,133,7S3 1
Plus $
It Wwat "lon of pelt 31,623,610 I'M an 2,ON1141 11916161E 1,111,216
y, 12 Osiamistion
EVM 1A72,5N 2,08,/0 2,116,111 20Ul,tp 2,272,911
13 fqualet Aftm) Aewre,e Mqulnt'tnt 25, ?V, IQ
31,W,011 37,197,191 31,130,7!1 4S,22S,520
14 plant In Sarin
3!2,09!,317 3610111,81 $61,111,81 313,210,83 $8,611,951
IS Lust Acaatlatel
pepneiatlen 325,601,270 81,119,440 331,all, SM 333,417,1!3 IN. no,*
` 16 toll CWHIsiltions 626,3N NO, IN 0,3M 610.316 W, IN
11 plwt all (bona Funded) 0 0 2,1411000 2,N1.000 2,/11,000
11 tlqualn Not plant In Senia 25,1101141 31, 310,sm 31,310.010 31.121,773 32,311,121
y
19 Salo Aewnue Lot ECA 333,1701615 335,640,117 337,422,!26 939.293,98 340,115,721
Nu Aevem Growth
20Im Rate wk 2,470,172 1,ra,031 1.671,141 1,511,1!1
21 Ovlra7l late N4 0.004 0.001 0.0% 0.004
01001 0.004 0.004 0,004
k 22 Mtm (19)•(13)
y i
' 23 Nato of bturo (22)/(16) fE' 2 ~ S4.41111, 86 ~0 724 1114 (31,3.13.414
h Avg N•8 Adm, Rota of Return (11,410,416) -2.1N
at g: 25 Oak Ce Omp Adio ((19)•(lO))/{2) 3111 2.59 1.35 I.56 -0.04
24 funds AwilablIAftop Oelt (19)-(7) 11,229,2!9 (3,214,115 31,111,316 $1,763,234 (33,441,243)
21 Aetum an City 4ulty 1.!!1.644 1,611,705 3,161,344 1,192,131 1.622,661
21 funds Awl table After Mtum 6,611,615 710 {636.073) (91106) (1.214,910)
to W& In1 Capital
30 We Aewnw per k1Ai 0.0543 0.05? 0.0561 0.0367 010567
f~ 1t 2CA per kkh 0.0316 O.O2t6 0.0199 0.0209 0.0160
)2 Total Cut W 6A 0.0061 0.0713 0.0766 0.0116 0.012?
i
i
„ . .dy rr,.n..,lr ,..,F~t.1Ad{.;i~~. t!•s'!.yy
t
J
x
City of 00010" lloctric Uti;lty Page / of 1
1916 Wh 0aign Study
DeseMptton
FY 9-3046 FY 9.30.11
Yi~ranup t
Fuel i3S,610,1q 131.E 1~,6,6,P
Total 14.40. 331 !3, IS1,100
S0,0M,361 60,611,661
0perolm 6gaaw 6,111,061 7,!61,000
pua) 6 hNChya ftWi
" 13,51161! ti,w,ao
r ; Total 11,3M,6it 16,151,100
31,W'w
tog! O i N 13,911, ON
I:.a .110,/10
Y 0dw AwurMt I3,3M,1a)
c Wk Sarka (611011610)
" s. ~,su,111 s,ar,a1
Coital witi«r
111,30 w,ao0
%o of an Investment
1,~~ 1,111,3M
` W $n6 Coital
0
0 33
Awdnlor 1
1,M1,161 003)
16A Selem fM,116
T06, oil VIA
MOM 0.0166
lncrwt (Decrwe)
a sC4jr" r*~.t
4
4 , ' 1
t r
V
•
a r~
n,
4:7 1
311
y
~k
1
EXHIBIT V A-2 10-Dec-86
City of Denton Water utility
A Current vs. FCOposed Rates
r
( urrent
` Rs • c e u e Propose
Rates Rates
Residential Rate WI $4.50
P' 3/4" Meter 1150 11,45
First 15,000 gal 1.90
l 8wwr .55S 1.45
151000 - 300000 qa 1
15 000 - 30000 qal Minter 1'5 1.80
c. 2.20
' Ali over 30,000 gal summer 1.55 1.45
All over 30,000 941 Minter
Comore Lal/I ndustrLs I Rote W2
r , . $10,35 19.60
3/4" motor 1152 1.40
Commodity Charge/1000 pal
mlalea for Re•al• Rate W3 $164.25 $150.00
~nd Chargqeer 1~ObOga1 16.00 1.35
ComMwdlt Chat" 0.63 1.65
over 300000009al
5if A .
b Utre-0ovrrAmat Finishod Water Rate W4 $10.25 $9.50
X 3/4" motor 1,52 1.40
Commodity Char"A000 qri
melee-Governmi•nt Raw Water Rate W6 $97.00
minimum Chat" $106.75 0190
COw*dity Charge/1000981 1.ao
dtandb sire servige Rate N7
' 114.25 $12600
1 Lim
21.25 18.00
Lino
` Neter~d Ny4ants Rata W10 $1?.75 $15,00
Custwor chat" mliaimum 1.65 1140
Commodity Charge/1000941
r Oki
yh + a.,
5 _ r. k.d.q 6FYa4y •ri 1{MM.^ r,,. ..+3, r - r 11.p. yyy yyy~...1,.y0.140 r _ _ .
A. t
FFF"`
PN,.
5
I
EXHIBIT V A-3
City of Denton Water Utility
Residential Bill Comparison f
Current Rates vs Proposed Rates
r
City of Denton Water Utility Bill Comparison
} Billed Proposed Rate W1 Current Rate W1 Current/Proposed
gal Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter
0 $5.00 $5.00 $4.50 $4.50 11.11% 11.11%
1$000 6.55 6.55 5.95 5.95 10.08 10.08
2,000 8.10 8.10 7.40 7.40 9.46 9.46
3,000 9.65 9.65 8.85 8.85 9.04 9.04
4,000 11.20 11.20 10.30 10.30 8.74 8.74
6,000 14.30 14.30 13.20 13.20 8.33 8.33
80000 17.40 17.40 16.10 16.10 8.07 8.07
10,000 20.50 20.50 19.00 19.00 7.89 7.89
12,000 23.60 23.60 2i.90 21.90 7.76 7.76
"y 140000 26.70 26.70 24.80 24.80 7.66 7.66
15$000 2845 28.25 26.25 26.25 7.62 7.62
170000 32.35 31.35 29.15 29.15 1048 7.55
19$000 36.45 34.45 32.05 32.05 13.73 7.49
21,000 40.55 37.55 35.30 34.95 14.87 7.44
23$000 44.65 40.65 36.90 37.85 14.78 7.40
25x000 48.75 43.75 42.50 40.75 14.71 7.36
28,000 54.90 48.40 47.90 45.10 14.61 7.32
30,000 59.00 51.50 51.50 48.00 14.56 7.29
330000 65.60 56.15 56.90 52.35 15.29 7.26
36,000 72.20 60.80 62.30 56.70 15.89 7.23
39,000 78.80 65.45 67.70 :1105 16.40 7.21
I
43,000 87.60 71.65 74.90 66.85 16.96 7.18
460000 94.20 76.30 60.30 71,20 17.31 7.16
490000 100.80 80.95 85.70 75.55 17.62 7.15
r
60,000 103,00 82.50 87.50 77.00 17,71 7.14
55000 114100 90125 96050 84.25 18.13 7.12
60,000 125.00 98.00 105.50 91450 18.48 7110
Block Charge
' Proposed Rate W1 Summer Winter Summer winter
+ Customer Charge 5.00 5.00
'-4 First Block 15 000 15,000 1.55 1.59
•y Serond f lwl,, in,nnn in .00Q 2,f1-, 1.55
q'hi~.'1 fll,, 1 n,nni. ,111000 :.,'fl 1.59
b
,F.
A'AAA
EXHIBIT A V-4
City of Denton Water Utility
Commercial Bill Comperircn
Current Rater vs Proposed Rates
i
City of Denton Water Utility Bill Comparison
Billed Proposed Rate W2 Current Rate W2 Current/Proposed
F gal Summer Winter Supwr Winter Susrrer winter
~r rrrrrrr rrrrrrrr rrrrrrrr rr. .rrr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr
0 $10.25 $10.25 $9.50 $9.50 7.896 7.891
fir 21500 14.05 14.OS 13.00 13.00 8.08 8.08
5,000 17.85 17.85 16150 16.50 8.18 8.18
` 100000 25.45 25.45 23.50 33.50 8.30 8.30
12,500 29.25 29.25 27.00 27.00 8.33 8.33 '
158000 33.05 33.05 30.50 30.50 8.36 8.36
t` 178500 36.85 36.85 34.00 34.00, 8.36 8.38
20,000 40.65 40.65 37.30 37.50 8.40 8.40
250000 48.25 48.25 44.50 44.50 8.43 8.43
350000 $3.45 63.45 58.50 38.50 8.46 8146
40,000 71.05 71.05 65.50 65.50 8.47 0.47
45,000 78.63 78-65 73.50 72.50 8.48 8148
501000 86.25 66.15 79050 79.50 8.49 8.19
55,000 93.85 93.85 86.50 86.50 8.50 8.50
60,000 101.45 101.45 93.50 93.50 8.50 8650
650000 109.05 109.05 100-50 100.50 8151 8.51 I
700000 116.65 116.65 107.50 107.50 8.51 8051 I
750000 124.25 124.25 114.50 114.50 8.52 8.52
90,000 131.85 131.85 121.50 121.50 8.52 8.52
85,000 139-15 139.45 128.50 128.30 8.52 8.52
90,000 147.03 147.05 133.50 135.50 8-52 8.52
i 95,000 154.65 15445 142.50 142.50 8.53 8.53
100,000 162.25 162.25 V,2-'-0 149.30 8.53 8.53
110,000 177.45 177.45 16i.A 163.50 8.53 8.53
120 000 193.65 192.65 177.50 177.50 8.54 8.54
'130,000 207.85 207.85 191-50 191.50 8.54 8.54
140,000 223.05 223.05 205-50 205.50 8.54 8154 f
• , - Block Charge
Proposed Rate R Summer Winter Summer Winter
Customer Charge 30.25 10.25
9'irst Block 0 0 1.52 1652
Second A1ne~k 1.12 1.52
r~
d
tl;
. .,°F=a, sea y,.'.,, .ao wr e..
4
r
EXHIBIT A V-5
City of Denton water utility
Resale Bill Comparison
I Current Rates vs proposed Rates
h ~
City of Denton Water Utility Bill Comparison!
Billed Billed Proposed Rate W3 Current Rats W3 Current/Proppoosed
...gal MGD Demand Summer Winter Sumwr winter Summer Winte:
. '
~
237,700
13,418,000 8944533 $22,924 $22,924 $21,390 819,264 7,174 25.511
815810000 247,000 98516 9,516 13,409 11,734 -29,03 -18,91
8,305,000 359,$00 11,147 11,147 12,953 11,362 -13.95 -1,69
6;786,000 316,200 9,492 91492 10,447 90311 -9,14 1.95
1 7,429,000 371,000 10,774 10,774 110508 10,179 -6.36 5.85
8,994,000 394,300 12,133 12,133 140090 12,292 -13.09 -1.29
7,546000 407000 12,709 12,709 11,701 10,337 0.61 22.94
t^ $8930,000 4830300 13,517 13,517 13,985. 12,206 -3.35 10,74
905721000 413,700 13,927 13,927 15,044 13,072 -7.42 6.54
{ 210824,000 657,773 24,431 24,431 35,260 291612 -30,71 -17,50
160397,040 890,900 240742 24,742 26,305 220206 -5.94 11,02
9.
7~Y
4.
A
r i
I
z k`
i ,
Block Charge
s Proposed Rate R summer winter Summer Winter
'►t customer Charge 15749 157,8$ !
first Block 0.63 0.63
I:
,IA= A+ r } ~y}III,I{1 I.~IiJ1I' 1640 16.00
x{ r '
't
kI~
t, 1jJ ~ 7
t I .c:, i, h+0.w•. ti.o-;.,.. ,...v-y ..u'ipt};y 1!`«•~~kx
k x!,
x
1
ay{
1
ti
Rats Cowparisoe IsAIN l V 1-6. Poll I
• -
Rate Schsduls ---►rsesnt ogle.... ....Proposed Role ..•Cospossls---
Sumer IMlsler Suggest 1118141
Msldaetlal Serrtca (R-11
Cualo"I Facility Coargs 16.66 16.50 65.11 16.50 No rate coasts is proposed.
Sooty Charts 0.0116 0.1116 1.1166 1,1165
Rssidaelisl Seines IR-21
Cusleoor Feellilyy Cbsrta 66.61 16.50 15.61 61161 No fall ehu/s is proposed,
Realty Chifga -tat Week 0.0606 0,6615 0.0513 I.Ii15
160109 Charge - Ind gloat 0.1615 1.1115 11.1615 6.1115
Oeeirat tisrrlee (o3)
= Cush"" Facility Charge
Slajls pit$$ 111.00 111.10 611110 611.10 mall retuelloa le Poo 411111d.
three Prstr 16,00 16.01 16.11 I6.It DeellalNI 00091y block 181116141d.
Dersed Chi p 6.40 1.11 6.75 6.10 First 6 No are sot billed.
gAal~y'CAr ;a
First, bt::N 6.4365 6.0366 6.1711 6.1760
4eaoed fiiicl, 6.4356 1.6356 6.1356 6.1364
` 4401ta~sr got. (at)
Cull 1 . lily Mille 110,66 610.61 616.00 106.11 Polo reduallos is proposed.
Delsan Chi 4.21 1.20 6.75 5,75
10091 Chi p 1.0315 0,1326 1.6241 6.4364
p'F
r late FPoloist. ttp!
~d Cu616"t 6:111ly Charge 111.11 011,64 116.11 616.16 Asia /sdusllos is proposed.
04"Ad Chatle 1.00 4.14 6.11 111111 -
I8etoy''Chit •)e 1.1106 811311 0.4344 116341
t r,
z, Lual Oerslnmeal'tDll
cust"el Facility CAatta
$[Aola Obese, $14.46 $11.61 111.11 116.14 halo fodsetles. Is priposed.
c, T pha/e .15110 15146 16.66 16.60 -
dneobl Ad►aChaIOa 4.10 4.14 1.60 4.56 y
> [color Cost*# 0.0264 1.0166 6.6216 6.0316
n
m
u,
kx~
y;
Alto Coag811606 Exhibit V 8-5, pose a
Street Lighting 4021 6 0041-10-D&Na Llohlias (D-01
••proseat Rau- ---Proposed Asia---
LikI Type--- -02- -OD- -02- -00-
1100 Sod has vapor , 11.11 10.20 84.68 11.11 Role rsdeeliea Is Proposed,
is: 6edlru vapor r 0.x0 1.20 6.54 8.10
411W mdisle Vapor 1.41 111.16 1.26 1.76
116ri Msreolr vapor 5.41 6.15 5.211 6.20
2sw Ntreatl vapor 6.41 2.15 1.25 2.21
Alm Notedly vapor 8.35 10.15 0.10 14.11
loom Mataorp vapor 16.30 NIA t4.16 MIA
M1 Trollit signal llohlloo (01)
. lastly poll oar kWh $$.141o 11.0410 No Isla choose is propoeed.
present Rate---- •.--Proposad Rate----
AIhIa1iC Fie Llghliee IAF) Samar W1416r Beaser ■latar
Cral.Fie1 ee choose
Single F . % 626,10 120.00 024.66 121.06 Rele redaction is Proposed.
Tkr01 Phir+ , 20.64 20.10 20.66 20.11
Riot&'y Chip;a
Peel 6asl:a
011 Pr ,r'crlod 6,0410 1.0410 0.1216 1.0216
the Pe. 1+1lod 6.0620 1.6020 4.6151 6.61P61
Oit;pas' 11604
Ott Pi.P6tiod 0.1411 1.6411 0.1211 8.6216
Oo Pat 'Ierlod NIA MIA NIA MIA
' Onoeed Ch+ 3•
took ses:: e
Oil Pe, lariod 61.11 11.01 11.60 11.11
04 pea. ?anal 4.10 4.16 4.66 4.61
r Oil P461 14666m
ggf"f4~ 04 Olf pool P40104 1.61 1100 1.66 1.60
Aellstoes Worship service (R11)
i lroasal Rate Proposed Rely---'
" Cr01oN Faclirlise Cho lot asonet Minter Seawer Mlolet ,
tiASIT lhsre $18.00 016.88 018.&1 $10.6• Rote INoellea in end.
Three fAaa 16.01 It,$$ - 16.06 16.6` Dseliaia soa
`r&p block lailleted.
latrsT Chigoe too KYM 1.0166 1.1860 Cep l 6.6150 First 0 f0Y0 dre oat billed.
SlldrsI Chnise too Ks" MIA MIA 0.8621 6.IfOf
assailed CA6101 4.25 4.16 0.16 6.76
x
.1
,
.
kr' ( _ ~.~.....~,.rr........w-..~.rw.~~~~^-•..-...'•...•.•°••ail..a.Y.wy.O.:AeY+baM.n...wHaua.Jaq'..l3iYikJf(YNIMAM..'.MEiw...MV.
3
M1
yyw
1
S
-
Exhibit V h S, Pag$ 3
Tompolary Service 4111
•--prooeal Palo.... •--*proposed Rats----
Cdsloaut Facilities Charge SoomI sister Swemor Mislay
$10114 PAst• $11.00 111.01 111.01 IJ1.0/ Male rodecllos It Proposed.
The 3a Phase 15110 15.11 15.01 15.10
loony Charge 0.1110 1.1111 0.1151 1.0151
"Sloadby 6IVIC a ISP)
Film As Available talc
Costs"I Facilities Charge 115.00 115.10 646.04 Now rate schsddle.
Damon" Chafes 6.12 1.31 1.13
ioergY Charge 0.0301 6.1301 1.4301
TIdea _01 Use - Qlnersl $#$vice (161
f Pr11oon1 Proposal I proposal 3
~ iaoll~ly' C6arq~
f• ~Ilo Phs:r $20.00 131.11 420.01 Proposal 1 provides for so across
Thies pha1• 30.01 31.10 30.01 Ike board radueliea Is Ike T6 rate
M.. Ea11f/Y Coi7ge 60sal to the tadoelloa Is The 6S
felt. No eoaages le too time
►a• ~Siatan poll
ed11.
1:6a1'Ibors 10.0100 14.6150 01.'Mil
t dll Ikk ra 1.1311 1,031'5 1.0461 Proposal 1 0110108166 TCU demaad
+ Olf ►d~f 0.1311 1.1335 NIA 411411116 aad 6811006 the 00 peak
Da dsdcholge peeled 10 bodet erNiog 13:11 -11:00
weekdays aad Woekesd days.
Pd6A,lasaon
peak Medl.' 81.15 $0.11 NIA
all took ►~c , t 3.35 3.11 NJA
011 66 !es 1 6.10 1.01 NIA
WS i
k
1'4
e
1^~
e-
Lt^AV lee
i
1'G
T(d ~A L
y
y
a~
Tlw• of Use - Prlwatr Service 11P1 ishibil tr i-$. Palo 1
/roo•al Proposal 1 proposal !
f.eirrlr CUery $10.01 100.10 t11.11 proposal I prevrdee lot to stroll
Istlit q i0• equal U10 the loduelios the too G31•
peak taaesa role. No •►•qsa to toe f lm•
Peek "ws 11,0100 i1.01TS $0.1!10 periods.
" Off Peak Norrs 1.1500 1.1300 ,1.135 proposal ! sllwiosles TOU demand
011 Peak losaoa 0.1350 6.1551 NIA "S9196 lad amore lo• oa peak
Oswaad Coat$*' Palled Is oasis adla 13:00 -11:00
Peak $ageeo raiders sad weekend Sara.
peak Norr6 t1.JS $1.50 NIA
Off took Hama !.!S 5,25 NIA
' OII Posh 56610" 1.11 1.25 NIA
r.
This ei use - .-rideatill Serrle• ITRI
Proposed
iii tawer Chu;. Rats
N-1 P
1$0.01
iae(Sr CAa1pe No time of w• rats was previously
r seek NOrr3 0,11!6 Offered rosldeallol touww(a.
OII Peak H:-ire 1.1101
i i•rfej~a.61e dies IPI) ptsisol Fro Dead
u; l r1r
it, r 0t.13/pi00 1.1ll 11,0511 1411#6
6601 I h Italy todrall•a1a prepoud.
066e60 Chat)? 5.00 1,11 Dlaeoot from E► aaartr Nar1a
to 0110106101. Ike d aeeaal from
the EF dwad sharp Is lotruud
Is It.11.
40
a
r.a
7
i
I
44
e
pr ` Ar
EXCERPT
MINUTES OF
1 PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING, December 16, 1986
c
3, RECEDE REPORT ON ELECTRIC._WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY
{
Wagner reviewed the recommendations of his firm's study as `
j stated in the Executive Summary portion of the report.
}
Wagner emphasized the proposed 'Utility Accounting Group'
due to the need for detailed plant and expense information,
and load research data, for future ratemaking and planning
i purposes, Wagner proceeded to expand on the need for a
comprehensive customer load management and research program.
' It was the opinion of his firm that a load research program
should be instituted for both water and electricity,
especially since the introduction of time-of-day rates will
- require that efforts be made in order to effectively
" monitor the results.
a According to Wagner, out-of-period adjustments applied to
sales and revenue for the water and wastewater utility
should be closely scrutinized and documented to show when
they occurred: Such adjustments should then be "normalized"
for load research purposes,
Wagner also stressed the yto insure cthat
" more closely with
r: revenues are matched with expenses.
The results of the rate study also encouraged the use of
demand side programs for both water and electricit. The
water utility was advised to charging ah one ng for imfire
protection, or alternatively,
} fee for fire protection to offset the significant costs for
on advsed
rotection.
firo protection provided to
such fee the regarding firesp
against
against implementing stating
any The eoasd concurred vide that
adequate sfiree flowdwithout
position of the city
assessing a special charge.
a Wagner stressed the need to implement a plan to compile
necessary data to meet PUCT avaand TWC ilable iaa insufiicientito
requirements, Data currently i
meet these commissions' filing requirements in Wagner s
estimation.
Thompson asked how expensive it would be to implement these
recommendations. Wagner stated that in his opinion the
load research program and the data compilation program to
' meet PUCT and TWC rate case filing requirements would be
' the two most expensive items to imples*rit. Facilities and
resources are currently available to implement the other
recommendations.
research was
Tying monthly fuel}factormand
Nelso expensiv agreed
item to that load
adjus tments to revenue is already being monitored. The
adjus
Board felt opposed in principle to the expensive collection
of data which may or may not be necessary.
5
I
AA ~ f
Wagner r<'riewed the funds available after return for the
water and wastewater utilities. The proposed water rate
x f increase will affect the 15,000-20,000 gallon per month
.4 customers the most. smaller users will get a 7.91 increase
versus the 9.5t increase proposed for the larger users such
as heavy lawn irrigators.
Goble reviewed the impact of the
various electric rate classes/ proposed new rater on the
~ he average electric rate
decrease will result in a net of $15 per year, The average
proposed water increase will be a net of $10 per year. The
• average customer's net bill will be up between 501f and
$1.00 per month,
Boyd asked about the religious worship electric class
(RW). Nelson explained that most customers with higher
load factors will have lower per RWH charges.
Coomes recommended additional study for the proposed
utility accounting group. Coomes also desired further
`i study into what needs to be done in terms of equity
regatdinI the religious worship rate.
Thompson moved to approve the
l proposed new rates.. as
presented. Boyd second. All ayes # no na y
s, motion carried
unanimously.
a.
i
y 1
t
f f,
r
3 f,
4 r `
uf„
M1
r
l
, r
F S
w' --a
111111111111 1 LA
`'t {
V
r it
!
x"
F R "S ,
9 Z
FFFtlj k'^
f
yY, y
w
!k
0 r'
s tb
k~ , .
a,,q
:4..
t
4 j 4
j r
r.
i*rF
~y 'SY',
, ,
DATE: January 23,,1987
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council.
s•
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SU33ECT; Letter of Agreement between the City of Denton and North
4q~ Texas Repeater Association.
rte: RECOMMENDATION:
( 9~
That the resolution for the agreement between the City of Denton
and the North Texas Repeater Association be adopted.
SUlMART:
3~+
This agreement allows public service for the amateur radio community on
147.300/147.900 MHz frequencies during emergencies or disasters. It also
' allows telephone interconnect for amateurs calling into City emergency
services from mobile or portable units during emergency.
BACKGROUND:
We agreement is required to use the tower at McKenna Park in copp-
,y ` station with joint City offices. It also allows direct communication
with all staff as well as elected officials should any disagreement arise.
+`x PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Radio Amateur Communications Emergency Services.
s( Emergency Management
Utilities water and electric.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
l . ,lt t,
Respectfully submitted,
Ar
kJo
Llo V. Harrell
City Manager
y" Prepared by: j
A
oss D. L , Jr.
Emergency Management Coordinator t
i Approved by:
a + B ge o
Direcbor of Cowunity Services `yl
Tt
j• S.riW.'.'•"°'rf„hW ..a..`..«., o. •.pl,~:'.yM .fi.d f.li. n.,+.,_ .......~.,N,ru.-ivl;;vlhL.~io ti.`~KdiF44.~~
l
r
o'
17811
q'
{
f
c i NO.
i
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON
4'. AND THE NORTH TEXAS REPEATER ASSOCIATION FOR EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANCE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
r That the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby authorized and
directed to execute and attest, respectively, an agreement
' between the City of Denton and the North Texas Repeater
Association for emergency assistance under the terms and
conditions being contained in said agreement which Is attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
rt SECTION II.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
aC~' its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of r 1987.
d
RA '
--"-TEPHENS MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
TERS
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
r' t
Ail
_i
BY Luna) h I ..01r, '~p
R
11M 40,,4 I'll .A '4
{
i
I-
f`
i
1bS9L
THE STATE OF TEXAS S AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NORTH TEXAS
REPEATER ASSOCIATION AND THE CITY OF
COUNTY OF DENTON 9 DENTON, TEXAS
The City of Denton, hereafter referred to as the it
the North Texas Repeater Assoclatiok, hereafter refer edtyto aas
"NTRA", hereby agree to the terms and conditions Cind
in.
here set forth
SECTION I. Pu-rD03
The purpose of this agreement is to
communications for the City of Denton in meetingviany emergency
A or disaster from enemy attack or other cause, natural or man.
made. This agreement recognizes that the
' effective utilization of the resources of the respective uorgania
:atl°ns, the. City and North Texas Repeater Association, is an
effective utilization of the resources of the respective parties
and, way be essential to the safety, care and welfare of tho
people thereof in the event of a major emergency or disaster.
SECTION 116 Responsibilities
The directors and officers of both parties shall constitute
a committee to formulate plans and take all necessary steps for
the ,impl,ementation of this agreement. Such
incorporate the use of resources, Including planning shall
equipment necessary. It shall be the duty f each°nnei and
formulate .emergency plans and programs for applicatiopa within
the boundaries of each. There shall be freqent consultation
bet"wean the representatives of the City ,,du NTRA and 'tree
exchange of information and services, in c
t A, emergency service , the 'City and,NTRA shall, soa alias out such
prov de and foilew uniform standards possible,
regulations, Including: practices and rules and
A. Warnings and signals for exercises or disasters and
" the mechanical devices to be used In, connection
therewith;
B. Selection of equipment and services used, or to be
used, for emergency purposes to assure that such
a§e equipment and services will be easily and -freely
interchangeable when used in or by the other party;
' C. The conduct and control of
5 radio o orators City staff generators
atother tiustees,
personnel and 'heir p nvolved
pro er movement or activilles
~r
i
7
prior, during and subsequent to exercises
emergencies or disasters;
r'
D. The compliance of governing FCC rules and re ula-
r° lions, which may require periodic monitoring of the ~
frequencies involved by the City.
Equipment provided by NTRA must not belong to an individual,
but must be NTRA approved, sponsored and operated.
i
Either party requested to render aid shall take such action f
as is necessary to
provide and make available the resources
r' covered by this agreement in accordance with terms hereof;
provided that It is understood that the party rendering aid may
withhold resources to the extent necessary to provide reasonable i
protection for the other. The emergency communications forces,
NTRA, and the utilizing forces, the City, will continue under
the command and control of their regular leaders but the com-
munications units or forces shall come under the operational
control of the City authorities receiving assistance when this
agreement is activated.
SECTION III. Administration
The City Manager or his designee, shall be responsible for
the administration of this agreement on behalf of the City, i
All requests under this agreement shall be made between the
r~~x
City and NTRA officials, or according to emergency plan
activltl'on, when appropriate.
fi°H I '
SECTION IV. Assistance by NTRA
The following detailed services shall be provided by NTRA to
the City:
k.
a
A. Emergency communications, if requested, for:
' I. Telephone/power outages
ii. Tornado warning
Ill. Flash flood warning
a° iv. Shelter/evacuation
=h. Y. Surveillance/reconnalssance 1
H. Non-emergency services for:
1. Provision of consultation on communications
systems/upgrade
Plaanini for other emergency services
Page 1
a"
A
Y
r
iii. Provision of electricity for repeater operations
iv. Telephone line/charges for repeater o
Y. UHF and VHF Aerations
vi. Maintenance Of tower and equipment
i
C. In addition, NTRA will continually maintain its
assigned area in a clean and neat manner and provide
a minimum of one patrol during daytime and one at
night, on an irregular basis, for security.
SECTION V. Assistance b City
a
The following detailed services shall be provided by the city
to NTRAt
A. Emergency support for:
_ I. Assessment of needs
Ii. Direction and control of Information
iii, Keeping NTRA informed of the emergency situation
Iv. Portable generator, if available
8. Non-emergency use of City's tower located at the corner
of Scripture and Thomas Streets.
' SECTION VI. Limitations
Limiting factors affecting NTRA services to the City will be
based on severity of situation and manpower availability due to
catastrophic disasters or survival situations. Portable power
generators ,are available for electrical power and normal
; repeater operations.
Limiting factors affecting the City's. service to NTRA will
be based on access to the antenna, repeater, and controller
apparatU's.
SECTION VII, Liability and Combensation
Neither. party shall provide payment' of compensation nor
death benefits to injured members of the other party and the
tr representatives of deceased members of either party in case such
members sustain injuries or are killed_ while rendering aid
~;L pursuant to this agreement.
a~. SECTION VIII. Supplementary Agreements
Inasmuch as it is
the arrangements for muptuala aid amongt twop(2}e or m re d agencies
a
Page 3
{
j,, .
r may differ from that appropriate among other agencies hereto,
this agreement contains elements of a broad base common to all
parties, and nothing herein contained shall preclude any party
or agency from entering into supplementary agreements with other
agencies. Such supplementary agreements may include and ad-
dress, but shall not be limited to, providing communications for
a. -a evacustion,reception of injured or other persons, and the
exchange of information concerning medical care, fire, police,
public utility reconnaissance, welfare, transportation and
assistance to the City communications personnel; equipment and
supplies for communications by NTRA. Specifically, City intends
to enter into agreement with another Repeater organization who
may be licensed to utilize City's tower and NTRA hereby
recognizes City's right to take such action and specifically
covenants not to interfere with the quiet enjoyment of any other
authorized organization's use of Citys property.
SECTION IX. Consideration
NTRA will pay one dollar ($1.00) per year for facility usaka
in addition to providing the above services.
SECTION X. Term
if This agreement shall continue in force and remain bindingg on
each party for one (1) year from the date of execution and shall
tJ. be automatically renewed for successive on (1) year terms, until
such time as the governing body of either party takes action to
withdrew therefrom. Such action shall not be effective until
thirty (30) days after written notice thereof has been sent by
the. other party wishing to terminate the agreement. Notices
` shall be ,seemed effective when deposited in the United States
mail, cert lied, postage prepaid, return receipt requested and
s shall be delivered to:
CITY OF DENTON NORTH TEXAS REPEATER ASSOCIATION
Lloyd Y. Harrell Woody Liljedahl
City Manager P.O. Box 2603
215 E. McKinney Dentont Texas 76202
' Denton, Texas 76201
f SECT ION, XI. Severability
This agreement shall be construed to effectuate the purposes
stated in Section I hereof. If any provision of this agreement
is declared unconstitutional, or the applicability thereof to any
persons or circumstances is held invalid, the constitutionality
of the remainder of the agreement and the applicability thereof
to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
1
Page 4
f"
a
F
t'
j
s
SECTION XI1. Default
Any violation of rules set forth in this agreement by NTRA
shall necessitate the immediate removal of all NTRA equipment
from City property and Invoke the provisions of Section IX.
SECTION XIII. No Duty Imposed
This agreement shall not be construed as or deemed to be an ,
vjreement for the benefit of any third party or parties. Any
performance undertaken by the City pursuant to this agreement
shall be pursuant to the overnmental function of providing
ea~irSency services to the pubglic is general and this agreement is
not meant to and shall not be construed an imposing any duty,
public or private, on any party hereto to provide any assistance,
aid, or care to the other party or to any third party.
e',YECUTSD this the day of , 1986.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
~ F.
BY:
RAY s MAYOV
tS / r`
ATTESTS
N
t Z*r*A IV 1115 A , CITY SECRETARY
f CM OF DENYON, TEXAS
T APPROVED AS 10 LEGAL FORM:
09BRA'ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTO.N, TEXAS
t. ;
NORTH TEXAS REPEATER ASSOCIATION
j BY:
WOODY ULjEDAJfL
Pape 5
' _ . : , . ,.,naafi ru•..: i
• , ~ ~.r:.u.h vl , ,Va•,M w.r {U'w'?f'iN'.w'7NF.y
u
3
a
i
c ~
{
e
,a
rM,
i ~
t.
i`
t~
kT
e
c-lv; lo
'
Ft a tk kI
L t •
1F.L i l fjl
11
N A fa
(M111F~i ti➢ 1 . A~
d~~Fi~ F! b ^t
r
t
r ~r
~ l t
i
n L n V ~
rk , ~
1 t
r tr` t r L ~l 1 FA ,
~ 1t,_ V y tJ
Fd Key .i f t
yg~ ~ t :~.~~J.jJriJN'A•If.L71M.w .w•+w!...WW~F~~~~e.....~..
1 a
e
17,
i .
1014L (51L)~
y~
{
NO.
AN ORDINANCE CALLING AND ORDERING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ON APRIL 4, 1987s AND, IN THE EVENT A
RUNOFF ELECTION IS REQUIRED, ON APRIL 15, 1987, FOR THE PURPOSE
OF ELECTING FOUR COUNCILPERSONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS FOR PLACES 1, 2, 3, AND 4; ORDERING THAT THE
PUNCH CARD ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM ADOPTED BY DENTON COUNTY BE
USED IN SAID ELECTION; DESIGNATING VOTING PLACES AND APPOINTING
ELECTION OFFICIALS AND PROVIDING FOR ELECTION SUPPLIES.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
Pursuant to the terms and provisions of Section 3.01 of the
Charter of the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal election is
? hereby ordered to be hold in the City of Denton, Texas on the
4th day of April, 1987, for the purpose of electing four (4)
councilpersons to the City Council of ine City of Denton, Texas,
as follows:
r
Place I - Councilperson to be elected for a two (2) year term by
the qualified voters of Single Member District No. 1
of the City of Denton, Texas. Candidates for Place
No. 1 must reside in Single Member District No. 1.
r,
r` Place 1 - Councilperson to be elected for a two (2) year term by
the qualified voters of Single Member District No. 2
of the City of Denton, Texas. Candidates for Place
No. 2 must reside in Single Member District No. 2.
Place 3 - Councilperson to be olected for a two (2) year term by
the qualified voters of Single Member District No. 3
of the City of Denton, Texas. Candidates for Place 3
` must reside in Single Member District No. 3.
Place 4 - Council arson to be elected for a two (2) year term by
the qualified voters of Single Member District No. 4
of the City of Denton, Texas. Candidates for Placo
No. 4 must reside in Single Member District No. 4.
In the event a runoff election is required, such election
shall be held on April 2S, 1987.
a SECTION II.
r
The polls for said election on April 4, 1987 and, in the
event a runnoff election is required, on April 2S, 1987, shall
PAGE 1
T
j
1
be open from 7:00 ABM, to 7:00 P.M., and the election voting
places or polling places shall be as follows:
a'
1. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 1 shall vote att
AMERICAN LEGION HALL
629 LAKEY STREET
DENTON, TEXAS
2. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 2 shall vote at:
FIRE STATION NO. 4
2110 SHERMAN DRIVE
DENTON, TEXAS
3. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 3 shall vote at:
NORTH LAKES RECREATION CENTER
2001 WEST WINDSOR DRIVE
ry C.ENTON, TEXAS
4. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 4 shall vote at:
i DENIA PARK RECREATION CENTER
1001 PAVIN
DENTONO TEXAS
L
i
~ 4 SECTION 111 6
lie'
9 The election officials for said election on April 4, 1987,
and in the event a runoff election is required, on April 25,
1987, shall be as follows:
1. (a) R. L, Speer shall be the Presiding Judge at the Central
Counting Station.
(b) Joann Garbselk shall be the Manager of the Central
i
Counting Station.
(c) kandie Smith shall be the Tabulation Supervisor at the
Central Counting Station.
20 Lovie Price shall be the presiding Judgge at the American
4j Lesion Hall in Single Member District No. 1.
aV
PAGE 2
1
4
n
1
a~}
s
j
# 3. Dorothy Alderdice shall be the Presiding Judge at the Fire
Station No. 4 in Single Member District No. 2.
4. Dorothy Van Dyke shall be the Member Presiding Judge No. 3,
District the North
Lakes Recreation Center in Single
S. Rosca Toulouse shall be the Presiding Judge at Denia Park
Recreation Center in Single Member District No. 4.
6. Jennifer Walters, Acting City Secretary shall conduct
absentee voting under the Texas Election Code.
The respective Presiding Judge of each voting Place and the
Central Counting Station shall be authorized to appoint a
assistants assist
as
them suffic in t said °relecilon,~s inas they cluding aybideem lingual necessary
required by law.
SECTION IV.
v, Absentee voting shall be conducted for the election to be
• held on April 4, 1987 and, in the event of a runoff for the
election, April 25, 19870 by the Office of the City Secretary in
the Municipal Building on East McKinney Street in the City of
Denton, Texas, and the polls for absentee voting shall be open
for voting in person between the hour of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.
Monday through Friday during the times allowed for absentee
voting.
P
L SECTION V.
The City Secretary is hereby authorized to prepare the
official ballot for said election and perform each and every act
~fe required by the Charter and laws of the State of Texas for
holding elections.
x SECTION VI.
The rate of pay for election judges and clerks shall be the
a maximum amount provided for by state lax.
SECTION VI
" It is further ordered that the punch card electronic voting
system adopted by Denton County be used in said election in
accordance with the term and provisions of Article 7.15 of the
'i Texas Election Code. The punch card electronic voting system
shall be used for absentee voting in person and by mail.
PAGE 3
h
I.
t PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of February, 1987,
x~
R EP S.Yok
1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
t` ATTEST:
gin, r
JEAN E
ACTING, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
wi
APPROVED AS.TO LEGAL FORM
' DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCHo CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
u
By
At, i r 1~c! }fir, r'.n~
,t q
e
Pn p t
r
1
PAGE 4
i
r,
~ " ! 44Na .a....a,-... _ _...,°~•.a "wnnub.l'wY.44a.Y6kaar .wvo.- ,
' •fi ..wai. v.... at..e•u...~.. '"fir
• rt1 w.r~r ,,,,,~,...r,..... x+;•irilp. Nb4.~1+t1w'WrTi fd7~.+h~'xr%
r ~
r air
j
v
,r
4v
I
1
} !
It
r ~
f
M1'. P H
I LA
;f
i.'
I } o,~
r •1
a 1~
: IF
h
A M..
IA
y °
1 ~ }
I-A
I-LJL
tiK E
a
I K;'' I
All
r
i
3 1658L
{
i
}
RESOLUTION NO.
i
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE LICENSE
AGREEMENTS WITH VARIOUS RAILROAD COMPANIES UNDER CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
1 WHEREAS, from time to time, there is a necessity to obtain
license agreements with various railroad companies to enable the
City to construct and lay out certain utilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City staff having recommended that the Lity
Manager or his designee be authorized to execute such
administrative agreements where the consideration to be paid by
r the City for such licenses is less than $10,000; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute
license agreements with various railroad companies in the event
the consideration for such license is less than $10,000.
€r
6 SECTION II.
That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987.
aSw
RAY i '
i f KAY?JR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
`r ATTEST!
• C ,a
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
*~,v r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
a
BY:
. gay.,#r a.. , L. M Ktw:...' p r-..... . '.AiSt1l .Y.t?tia' lNil ,
1
r
3
I Ill
i
y, a
e,
Tli y'
E d
a
sx;
-FT
q 1d
ae
v S ,
t s .j
I' A
v,
^I
' s<
a
4.
'i
eF, y
~ 1 ~ ...,...,..wn+rw+.w-«..rrv..r.s~s~r,aw.wMfblMi~MU1M1M'~r~~+'~'^^. •,y
~1j fem.
e
03 304 ~J~J,
t RESOLUTION NO.
k~
A RESOLUTION BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
f AdTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE TEXAS
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION REQUESTING FUNDING FOR A JUVENILE
POLICE OFFICER; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council of the City of
Denton to authorize the submission of an application to the
I , Texas Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for a
E Juvenile Folice Officer to augment the City's Juvenile Law
Enforcement Program; and
WHEREAS, Article 4413 (32a), V.T.C.S. was amended to enable
the Criminal Justice Division of the State of Texas to allocate
grants and administer criminal justice programs on a statewide
level; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such
funds and desires to promote the public safety and well-being of
its citizens through increasing the effectiveness of the Denton
Police Department in its law enforcement relating to juveniles;
NOW THEREFORE,
';...;:BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
,
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
,a. certifies that the City is eligible to receive a funding
allocation from the Texas Criminal Justice Division for a
Juvenile Police Officer to augment the City's Juvenile Lax
Enforcement Proj,ram and hereby authorizes the staff to submit an
application for such funds.
SECTION Ii.
`gas I:;
That the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City
Manager, or his designee, to represent and act on behalf of the
;y;.. City of Denton in working with the Criminal Justice Division in
regard to such grant application.
SECTION III.
That a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the
Texas Criminal Justice Division and the North Texas Central
Council of Governments.
I {
!^^•-.~v+s..,,. W..,......,.. .s .+,«r+es:Fal'.{1W AGL~M11;.,,.+r ......,_..a 1.p;}.1tw;unW~~. ~+:-.n w....y
r.
w
~r~
' j SECTION IV.
~r I
That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
`3 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987.
[yj,y '
wl RAYS , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
h s r " ATTEST
MERS, G CITY SECRE
CITY OF DWON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEW ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
r ' BY w . f ll csrriarZ`c' ~ ♦
1a
P Y;i
1" \~A
~ Fop " J .a
,
r~" 1
' ' A 'y........... ,v....,.. ,.....,...~.s.~,.,,p.%nattiNF:;i12,fiMY~a~+*n:,'w`.v ..+,w.«.......... _ .,+w..,.w.,
{ 7
r tr
s~
Vyg~~ d,i
R
i .
~M Y?
M1
0."
11FF
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
1 1 ~n
IY
Ir` 'Ax
1
M5 ~
' hf G
sl R f
~g f 5:
Y 1 G
e
1 e~
1 3 9~
)tY~! C < J 'S
*4 bs li lM 11 r~l:
r
R _...~r~.MYQY1FWWl'NMV#{wYVrr_r. . - ~.w 1
i
tl
j DATE: 2-3-87
CITY COUNCIL agPORT FORMAT
- k
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd ILirrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: H.O,p•c„ Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff reocumends approval.
SUMMAR Y.
This resolution affirms tha Council's support of
H.O.P.E.Is application for from
America/USA for Africa. funding Hands Across
" BACKGROUND:
This resolution was Prepared at the request of Jan Lewis,
i Executive Director of H.O.P.E. It will be inclu W in the !
I + proposal that w•111 be submitted to Hands Across America on
February 9th.
s PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:.
64
No other groups will be arfected. j
a
1A
` FISCAL IMPACT:
8A - A
4j
NOW
Respectfully submitted:
, k
r'S r.~. A Yrx' r5
a R
, p
Prepared by: 40yakeo City
t r,; m~~~Grr
Barbara
Iiose
F,
,i
T i l 1 e Camunity Developwnt Coordinator
ADProve
r x , sme f
Title Jef
Director of Planning & OCMI. zity Development ?
A n•w. w+w.`.i G~~ q y
, dkpJ+16~..r.'~+T'miRR,R'.pbrAl ~ta
[ r
,'dlA r P
X" r A
,
P
1699E
l
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION OF HELP OUR PEOPLE EMERGE
FOR FUNDING FROM USA FOR AFRICA/HANDS ACROSS AMERICA; AND PROVID-
ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
est-
WHEREAS, Hel12 Our People Emerge (H.O.P.E.), Ina. was e
s
lished on June 3, 1986 in an effort to assts; the homeleless
citizens of the city of Denton; and
WHEREAS, after careful t9nsiderati0n, the H.O.P.E., Inc, Board
d of Directors has submitted an application to USA for Africa/Hands
Acrosi America in order to acquire funding so thet a larger number
of homeless families may be served; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Der.ton wishes to M
recognize this worthy endeavor; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE 17 RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
as
SECTION I. That the Denton City Council hereby affirms its Y4
r support~o -t fie application of Help Our People Emerge for funding
from USA for Africa/Hands Across America.
jf SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective
imae a e y upon its passage and approval.
6
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of - , 1987.
4 +
E i O
CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS
ATTEST,.
s br F'CR TARY
CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS
lk~ {a APPROVED AS TO LEGAI+ FORM:
f DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
a` y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY I
r
• . y WMaMI°J AM..v i. . 1+,1ei1 R4'~~"rvyriMr4.. 4M...on.•4 n.. . ..,.r. ..,..y
-
Tip.
o
aa=
c
y,
4
,t
I
,P ,1 k _ssY^'~i
3 l f A Tot
F 4Y l
. rI
HOPE, INC.
PROPOSAL FOR TEXAS HANDS ACROSS
err9t ±ylB ~~a . 1
AMERICA EMEROENOY FUNDS
(Proposal for intermediate funding
will be similar to this proposal,)
.t
t
p,
v9
:Y
1 _ gyn.. {M'1MfF5'~~M1W►1wY CkYM/May..x~i>5k1.MbialF4.i~M~~t+►~i:iwNYtM .1~ rxw ~.r..p...w-,.,+r.J "
Y~`"rti r' l~s
P P r
i~` h . r k Y
1
A. 1, flame of Aronry to Hope, Inc. (Help Our People Emerge)
2. Cont,nr.t pnroon In dnn Lewin, I.xnoij1,1vn Dirnotor, 11. 0.
r4 Box 509106. Denton, Texas 7b206
a: 3. Phono {817} 387-0105
d. Affiliations - HOPE ban goon incorporated since Juno 23,
19861 therefore, it is not affiliated with any permanent
w _ funding, agencies such as United Way at this time. However,
's i HOPx is affiliated with the religious community. Eight
different religious organizations have supported HOPE since
its beginning. The business community has also provided
support through money donations and sponsorship of fundraisers,
tr„' 5, Funding sources to date have been the followings
I+' 1. Business and individual $20,578.98
i 2. Church donations 6,000,00
3. Gustave & Sarsh Roth Foundation 5000,00
Gannett Foundation 51000.00
5. Catholic Diocese of Ft. Worth 10000,00
6, This proposal requests emergency funds in amount of $8,000.00
♦
a:
n . ,y
tl ;y`l
♦ ,A t
b 1 ri
♦
♦
1 s
i
Kd~ 1'' 1 it
X~1i4 4~ %
Yi r
~~gpnww u,. . .,,...,rnnypabAAVYkN,w'el rl ..,,.r .•.`~w~l '1
V 1
i
r
x
yl ~y,` a
"
c
P. 0, Box 60948 • Denton, Taxes 76208
4 ti,
D. 1 Movnnhnr 3n, 19n6
Belgnce In/31/nF
15644.92
Betl 3311186 Thin blunth Yr To Uato
lncomee
s' Contrihutionsi 27n96.35 4n1.45 29577.80
" Int~rPntl _ 321.44 6W. _ 321.144
27417.79 $51015 27968.94
I This Month
" Totel Available 16196.07
4r 'a
Less UfeUurementa 21 997, 18
IL I
IIalarce Nov. 311, 19N6 13998.89
Disburamentfaf
0liente
Food 263123 1311.46 401.69
s4'. Clothing 35.78 73629 107007
` x Shelter 3045.00 375•n0 342000
Utiiit,les 90346 .0-
903s66
QRyroll 1383409 1166,64 5549.79
Promotion 1771925 257485 2029.10
Rent 127050 -n- 127.;0
uti1ltinn hle, 35 -0.
44.35
tifflon 11117.21 15691 903412
Taxt%e (Payr~"61) 712.40 83.43 395.83
Wraatorc '~tiar?n ML X6.60
11772097 2197.111 1397010
J IF,.. r
sl Mfg YP,kil'Illti'L SllkVl'r, d
, . DEgi~II, I FY,AS idi '
, 4511$]i3d SE
r I", trio. Is Andmlod by the Damon Mlrilslets' Assocl.tlon
r
, c
}
Y Ir s ii i ~q
~i~` j 1. Y.
J
i
RUVE, INC.
il. 2 PI-op(; cd i!u111;0L
k July, 1936 Lhrough Juno, 173'1
Direct Aid to families in form of Rent,
Utility, and Food neninhnnce
From July through December, 1986 $ 6,103.47
serving 2 families per month
Proposod to help 6 familten par
" month at $600 per month per family 21,600.00
for 6 months
>k Total Direct Aid $27,703.47
Office Rent for one month 127.50
Office space now donated for 2 years
Telephone for one month 19.00 r
Telephone now donated j
Utilities for one month 25,00
Utilities now donated ,
0
Bookkeeper (donates time)
M Office Sup lies and postage $50 per month
for 12 months (some office supplies and 600.00
duplicating expenses'are being donated) 1
Telephone Recorder anA Adding Machine 189,15
r~ k one time expense
Fundraising costa
$1,622,25 was spent in July and raised
approximately $17,004. Additional $1,000 2,622.25
was a grant specifically for fundraising
Staff
Director
Paid expenses for research and organization
for period Maroh through Mayy, 1986 in amount of
$300. Beginning June, first three months pay was
half-time4 Nino months full-time is based on 13,493.35
s $14,000 per year.
Gas Miles g0
approximately $80 par month beginning Nov., 1986 640 00
$00,00
Contingency fund
,'$45,91972
` k
s'
4w
~R
1.4
4
P
BOARD ROSTER
Dr, nud Iru, ?ton Atkinu reproucnting 111rot Uuitud Methodiut CliurClt
S
Mrs, Marcia Brrsnalian, Chairman of the Board, Social Worker at
Immaculate Conception Catholic Church
Sara Carey, Director of Birth Right
Mrs. Johnnie Corbin representing the First Baptist Church
Jerome Cott, owner of Sundown Ranch, representing Jewish community
" Rev. William Crouch, First United Methodist Church
Rev. Charles Isbell, First Christian Church
Tom Miller, Architect, representing Unitarian Universalist Fellowship
Rev. Richard Nygren, St. Andrew Presbyterian Church
Rev. Ivan Orloff, Campus Minister
Mrs. Nancy Harrell, labor and relations professional, representing °
Christian Soience community ,
i
ti B, STAFF N
U, Mrs. Jan Lewis, Certifiod Social Worker, Executive Director
w
i
~ooo
`i
~ t
~ n';I a4 efi. ,.a
a
n ~
F
av 5 v.it.
fle. I ] i '4
4 X11
t'~ ; tli .RF.i.LY.wy(',YN'l~/.h~'~ Mlf'.~^MF<~'RU~'itN(~'~k'~l•+('
)r( I.
,
o
I
l,nrlftn nr,rlis nridrnnaed l,,y ilo4:o. Inc. nro thu followinrt
1, Bout nsulaLnncu
2, 116i'llty nnnIni•nit en
3. Food nnnarstnncc
1,. Clothinrr assistance ~nh nenrch
tqurpluymnnt, roanrrtrling and nnnlntnnrn with 6. Budget counseling,
7. Huteltlounl rounnalinp
8. Nome visitors for emotional support
ee is tho top priority because thereishio
need.
asation Don addresses
Rent
ton that specifically
n to
! organiztio
' There is lim tied utility assistance through the City of Denton,
and we work in coordination with them in meeting this need.
Food is Conception aCatholic hChthe urch. andiDentondCounty
Room, I ovided because the
Cooperative Ministries. Counselinrfamilies with
clients served by HOPE are multi-problem
dependent childran. Providing financial assistance alone
will not effect any real change in this deprivod and dis-
advantaged population.
son documented
The extent of the need for rent assistance has b
2.
~x. by several agencies. In 1984 United Way received 648 calla
' for helps in 1985 the calls increased to 1,092• In 1985
the family violence shelter received 107 calls for shelter
Denton r for reasons other than abuse. v
tive Ministries receiv A betwee
n a day for housing assistance..
r ;
The sevbri.t of, the need is justified by these facts' 3
1. Family disinte ration is inorrlned with homelessness.
2, Family vSolenco~ increases wit. he threroblem families.
ti; Substance abuse is increased in multiun er, insecurity,
from sleepl
Children suffer erformancedue to their ~aront~s ;j
f and consequently, poor school p
lack of economic resources. roblem.
5. There is no welfare to SndDent nhspecifically de- .i
6. There are no p
eigned to address the need for rent assistance and budget
a and employment counseling.
30 The specific activities/objectives of kiope, Inc. are to pro-
vide the following:
F 1. rent, utility, and food assistance for 30-900 dasees
2, employrent counseling and assistance with job 3, budget counseling
b, nutritional counselin
5, home visitors for smoionai support
Tho rational for aolecting these servir0vent familieslfreme
„ coals of Homo, Inc. which arandl(2)oto empower disadvantaged
r}.. `}a• becoming homelosa or hung anpry
f lo"
i t
~ ! o S i r '-1
r al
y.:yy"AM rAti saJ', Mi
w
5•,r.
S~
a
f
i families with skills and resources to become self-sufficient,
prcrrlur,l{vo cll,lson;~. IIUI'I; dofiueo n 1'runil.y rill bnlnl;
sell'-3ffirirnt when r1f, ln1nh onn nduIf, in rninrull,y rmrlnyrri,
an
when Mo fnmily cull itront rent nnri rood roluiromonts.
CC Tho program of sarvico/nothods and expected results are
k as follower
E 1. Rent, utility, and food anniotanco in provided for a
poriod of 30-90 days. This assistance will prevent a
family from becoming homeless and hungry,
2. Employment counseling is provided on a weekly basin by
trained volunteers. The counselors stress how to fill
out fob applications, the appropriate way to act and
dress for fob interviews, and help assess fob skills,
Hope, Ina. acts as an advocate for families with a can-
tact person at the Texan Employment Commission. HOPE
r also provides transportation for the iob search. This
counseling and assistance has proven o be fruitful in
3 helping each one of our clients find fobs.
3. Budget counseling is provided on a weekly basis by
+ trained volunteers once a fob has been secured. The
counselors help families identify spending patterns and
also help families prioritize needs. A savingga pprogram
is initiated. The goal of budget counselingg fa to teach
families how to better control their money in order to
~ L
gain economic independence.
Nutritional counseling is provided by trained volunteers
f to educate families in selecting and preparing the moot
K economical and nutritious of foods. The goal is to
stretch the food dollar while meeting the basic nutri-
tional needs.
r 5. The home visitors are trained volunteers who visit the
families on a weekly basis to provide emotional support.
Tho foal of the home viaitor is to help build the fami-
live self-esteem.
The overall program is administered by the Executive
Director who coordinates and manages the program in terms
of interviewing families, helping families evaluate their
resources and set goals, maintaining, the operation of
the office, and training and coordinating volunteers,
5. The extent that Hope, Inc, can address the total need iden-
tified above is limited to only two to three familioa a month.
HOPE has turned away an average of seven families per month
+ due to the lack of funds. This figure does not reflect the
' true numbor of families seeking help beosuso agencies are
aware of our limited funds and do not refer everyone seeking
help to us. Thorefore, the-request for emergency funds,
6. Toe roles of the clients in policy formulation and evaluation
tiro important. The clients are the primaryy evaluators of
the policy and activities of (tope, Inc. Tlro olientn are
49n
, I
l
M 1 lZ~
J ♦ 'r
i~ f Y
. I
Orl
- N. ti. i~"~,. 'L~i' b3i14'19"F'9•c.:l'A-pr,kf44AVitriRafr2' WJN
.7.d.3'#l.C W/IR'•riFytl '4,+ei6nMIhJL.N.5
k.. e
p
s
I
nuked to evaluate each plinne of the program as well as the
porformanco of atuff and volu116eora. Lolf-detormination
of nnrh of lnit b in rr'rtl ro I,orl nnrl ranch fn ml l,y in iron terl nn
an individual basin.
7. Client participation in delivery of services has been
limited because of the newness of the program. However, it
is our hope that former c1lints will become volunteer coun-
selors once they are secure and on their own. One former
client has begun helping by providing food for the pantry
and clothing for other families.
D. t. Related agencies serving the same constituencies provide
emergency assistance in the form of food, presoriptions,
and very limited utility and rent assistance. These agencies
do not provide a concentration of services. They are not
designed to provide extensive counseling in the life manage-
ment skills which are addressed by Hope, Inc.
2. My understanding of the responsibility of these agencies
is that they are established for emergency, one time only
assistance and are not designed to be a comprehensive program, r'
3. Hope, Inc. has worked in coopp oration with these related agen-
x cies very closely since its boginning through information and
referral, working both ways, and by making aura that services
are not being duplicated. y.
EVALUATION OF PROGRAM
~ T
r` The program will be evaluated by the interview method which
will measure the self-sufficiency of the families served in
the program one year after their completion of the program
Families are considered self-sufficient if at least one adult
o is gainfully omployed and when the family can meet rent and
food requirementtso
1 .
i
t Mr I..
i
i r
t
r -
7 rp
}r r`` 3ri f~ g~
t, {
'I
i ttt
4
"p..M4~1U.Aw w.. sae+kVM.gN.Y11KtDhFW r,-..✓. _ ~
e
r~Elf - /
stn' ,.fr:r? .
At TOnNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
I MRtER pAWOUE, JR. '
Up OUNf:All 111 LAW1El✓S nUlllnpO
nOOE R l N FAME! 101 N 91 M
MIK E OR i fF IN VtN I uN. 1l Ul IAN 1 4194
Of On4E HOPY, INS ftll rldlNt 4114 9AF 1019
WIlt1AU P PHILIPS, in
ORAVW SHELION Mf.AlIM f4fIC1
J JEFFREY EPAINOER 106W MAIN SI
IUINDOLPI7 W EIOU1 WOO il9AE 1011 Que
•'t' 711MIAN WAILER
DAVIOC WHIfE I[l[n11ONl µU1171911`
A WRLIAMWOOO December 30, 1986 wnrnlNU9nlR
Internal Revenue
Austin, Texas 73301
A
Ref Form 1024, Application for Recognition of
Exemption
Dear Biro,
jr;
Enclosed please find an Application for Recognition of
Y
or 11o enclosedncopies ofothenby-Lowe and theeArticlesAofo, we havo
Incorporation Thank you for
y your prompt attention to this
matter ,
rr` r sincerely yours,
v _ ~ ~ ~
A , ~ 1v
W °
Susan tlregh.orn
17r • Assistant to Miller Davidge {
Enclosures
MD/gg
IJ
1
r I.`
{
TM ~ , Y1
I~
'jjSy, RA , ' ` ` n..•. •W~liA.{. ~y..YlAk~'A~I AJ...44.ran.'~w n.. .n MMiiy-id.rJ.,~~(~.' ' '
~'r r1 7i
.
S
rpm 1024 Application for Recognition of Exemption
(Rev. aer,ch19") Under Sectlon 501(s
DMINe IS45Mt
) Iap4M. 3 al n
a«° or for Determination Under Sectlon 120
Every or anlatlon must furnlsh the Informationspecified. If any orpnlatlon does not submit the Information and financial data
ndulred, l~ls a pllation will not be constdeued on IN morRe, the or anlsatlon will be notified accordingly, and the application may
M returned, If you now more space for any item, you may ottah additional statements. Show your name and employer
lee 1,111 ion number an all attachments.
Except as shown blow, epllcanta must complete Parts I through IV. In addition, an or~aniallon must complete the schedule
tndlested below that rahlst Who code pctlon under which It Is apptyfng. If a Porters line Itsm alas not apply, enter "N/A."
Central apnlaatlona applying for a group exemption letter-See Rev, force. 60.27, 1980.1 C.B. 677, of late revisions., at get
publication 837, Tna£xempt atu1 for Your Organisation, available free at most Internal Revenue Service oNlcoo.
this application. N approved, w111 be open to public Inspectlon. (Sot oeneat Instructions.)
You must have an orgenlaing Instrument. N you do not have an organizing Instrum6nk do not file this application.
Check the appropriate box below to indicate the section under which you are applying.
D Wien S0I(tX2) -Title holding corpaatlons (Schedule A. page 6)
® Section 501(cx4)-CHic leagues, social welfare or anlatlons Qneluding certain war veterans' orpnInVons), or local associations of
employees (Schedule B, pagesa and 7)
D Wien S01(cxS)-1.abor,agrkulluial,or hortkulturdorganiations(Schedule C,page 7)
Swtk., r S01(cx6)-Suslness leagues, chambers of com , :rce, eta (Sche:olt C, page 7)
Section 501(cx7),-Social chubs (Schedule D, pages 7 one 8)
Section 301(c)(8}-riaternal beneficiary societers, eta, providing life, sick, see Went a other bonefits to members (Schedule [,page 8)
Sectlon 501(cx9)-Voluntary employees' beneficiary ossoclartIons (Schedule F, page 9)
D Section 501(cx 10)-Domestic helernal societies, orders, eta not providing life, sick, accident or other bone fits (Schedule C. page 8)
❑ Section 501(cx12)-Benevolent life Insurance associations, mutual ditch or Irti~Ilion companies, mutual or cooperative telephone
companies, or like organizations (Schedule 0, paps 9 and I6)
D Section 501(cx13)--Comforfes, crematoria, and like torporaVons (Schedule H, page 10)
Section S0I(cx I S)-Mutual Insurance eompsnles or assoctations, other then life or marlne (No Schedule tKulrod)
Baden 50I(cK I7r-Trusts prodding for the payment of suppltmental unemployment eompensstlon beneflts (Schedule I, page 11)
D Wien 501(cxl9)-A post or`aniaation auxiliary unit, etc. of post or present members of the Armed Forces of the United States
(Schedule , pap 1
Section 501(cx20)-Trust/oral lion for pro paid group lepl services (Porto I, Il, and Schedule M, pap 13)
j Bee - wl (led Group feed senkes plena (Darts I lI and Schedule l ceaa 13)
art ntilicatlon{Sea instruct on_a)
Is rug Mmeof orpntaatlen 1►Employer WWI II number (if
Elope, Inc. none, sees lflc nslruc! s)
see afeac Iran
r
I 2b CRY or town, county, state, and 2lp code 8 Name and telephone number gpncluding im coda) of penal to be contacted
I during business hours If more Informotion Is !Q
Denton, Denton, Texas, 7620 fuller Davidge (817) 56-010
uaDeeemberc<a3uiling per Inds of c*rB 19116 formed Activity codes satbwkcover
3U F e 19176 98 399
7 Has the organization filed redlral Income tea returns a exempt orgenlzation II motion tolumsf . . . . . . . Yes Nor
If ,Yes.: dale tho form numbe.(s),yean filed, and Internal Revenue office where filed
E
t art .--Typeo Rllty~n tell Documents (got Instructi
ons)Chwk 1M opli kable entity box and attach a eanfamed copy of the orgem tIon's orprI doe III and bylaws,
Caporal)en-Artkkseflncapaa(lon andbylawf. Tnn(--fuustlndenlun. ❑ Othor-ConsIllutlon or Micas of association mod It
18
t Under the penalties of perlury, I declare that I am eulhorlied to rip this spplkall on behalf of the abeW organiuUon and t haw examined this
! appllealion, IncludirN the aceonrpitI stolemenls, and le the beat of my knowledge end billet It Is true, Mocl and completer (I1ee General Insbucilens)
(77tee.G ..(,.1..:rlri.~ir~,t~:... Chair Old. of Trustees 40._
f (Synatme A.gna............... f.
Tit le
a autharny ei r) (0016)
nor flat k Reluellen AN N*the, see pop 1 of the Imtruellonsr
l
uwpaQe 72~,1A5
,~~da~L ,T T..?..4uw... e..,.... n: N I r. s... ~
fl
I
i
rem. tote a... s r.n 2
Paruw_ cllrnlaand Operational Information
I If you are the outgrowth or conlinuatlon of any form of predecessor(s), state the name of each predecessor, the period during which it
was in existence, and the reasons for Its termination. Until copies of all papers by which any bonsfer of assets was of faded.
i
9 N/A ~
i
1 11 you are now, a plan tabs connected in any way with any other organization, describe the organization and explain the relatlonshlp.
N/A
Olve a detailed narrative description of L.e organization's past, present, and proposed luture activities, and the purposes for whkh it
was formed. The narrative should Identify the specific benefits, servkes,or products the orgenlatlonhis "Idedawlpprovido.11the
apniratlon Is not fully operational, explain what stage of development Its activities have reached, what further steps remain fa It to
We= fully operailnal, and when such further steps will take place. (9o not state the purposes and activities of the aganizatlnn In
l ,neat term, or repeat the language of the orgent atlonet documents) If you are engaged In any busing" a fund nlsh+g activity,
escrbe In detail the nature and the scope at the ectiviy. Altech copies of any •iregiments with other pert[*$ related to conducting the
business of fund relsing activity. State how each buslne" activity enpged In tonlributed Importantly to your attempt purposes.
This is a new organization Its proposed activities are to provide housing
ur homeless or about-to-be-evicted families in the City of Denton. This will
a accomplished by providing rental support directly to the landlords for a
eriod not to exceed 90 days for any one family. Mental support may range from
portion to the entire mor"tts rent for any one month. Along with rental support,
he-organization plans to c m tribute up to $150.00 per month toward overdue util-
ty bills and/or food for the same maximum period of 90 days for any one family.
he purpose of this support is to help families who have experienced a temporary
j lnaheial dislocation due to loss of job, illness, divorce or other temporary
ircumstances, As to the stage of development, the organizational documents have
een pprepared, a Board of Trustees has been established, and minimal fund raising
etivities have commenced. The Articles of Incorporation will be filed by June
It 19$6 and further fund raising must take place before the organization to
ully operational. The organization.is not angaged in any business activity.
thee' than private contributions, the present fund raising planned is an ice
ream social/bike-a-thon, whereby the participants or others will sponsor the
iders at a stipulated donation. It is anticipated that this activity may raise
a much as $20,000.00. Other than fund raising activities of this nature and
> oliaitated contributions no other activities are planned. Recipients of aegis-
anoe from this organization are not expected to pay the organization back in any
ay, Although the organization does not intend, nor will it have, specific sup-
ort from any religious denomination, the Bd. of Trustees is composed of ministers
{ rom many different denominations and these clergy will provide a basis for re-
errpla to the program.
n
k' d List the atianlatWs. present and future sources of financial support, beginning with your largest source first
1. Private contributions
2. Fundraising activities
page 121,166 sibs
i
,
JH4
'I
-14
11144+1
1111 Hj4
t
p
i
n
L l
r r:
r
F
• f
~J rl i
l f
x J.Y
I ~n
J' P J
1.~
t t
F a' 'tiF
" r,iJ. y 0.
4~v, y r11' ~ ~
r 3'.
. r k A'
I IF
It I
1
y
I
"
DATE: 2-3-87
` CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
~ . TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
;r FROM: Lloyd k:arrell" City Manager
SUBJECT:
The adoption of a P,esolution by the oauncil of the City of Denton r
authorizing participation in the Section 312 Program of the
Housing Pct of 19641 and providing an effective date.
a RECOMMENDATION:
f The Planning Department reomnends approval
S Ut3M AR Y:
' 'the Resolution will ally the-CDBG office staff to submit
applications to The Department of Housing 6 Urban Development
(HUD for Section 312 rehabilitation loan funds
BACKGROUND: 'lhe Section 312 program provides low interest loans to
ry rehabilitate owner occupied and m,Ati-family residential
. and owr=cial.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED
* Its CDBG Staff will prepare applications and submit them
to HUD for approval
g+f FISCAL 114PACTs
r, .k The CDBG Budget will pay for the administrative costs of
the program.
o~ Respect H y submitted:
~r
` ' 4t Lloyd Harrell, City ~er
Prepared by:
4.~' ~I d3fC6.~
ame th wan9
Ti t 1 ty Developwnt Manager
1 s Ap ov
t " I
I
6 P v 'NC i t 1 e pirec r o Planning 6 Cortmynity Development
f 5 ..,,..h,,.. -x ....r"..laU. ua' m4'. ~....Mt:..r.. '-wrc✓ix, nb:~~'',~,~,,~~{{,,
r ShNro+:iaJaraao ,o.4.§id
i 4
•
}
R~
.
5
t
1
CITY of DxNrom
R ' CDOO OMko
1108 West oak
i rr Denloe,Tex&$76401
(9117 666$160
f
f
>t' F2MRANDU4
n ,s
faATE: January 28, 1987
Td: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning b Development
P' m: Elizabeth Funs, cmTm►ity Deveiotanent mainager
'
f b
SLMJ: Rental Rehabilitation Resolution
'ltle attached resolution will allow Mayor Stephens to execute
contracts and asrnro3nents for the Texas Rental Pahabilitation program
contract which was executed during Mayor Stewart's term. This re-
P-A
Solution was written at the request of the Texas Department of
Oam vdty Affairs. If you have any question regarding this matter
plea" call me.
Eliubft Evans y
Yi'n s~.r
Ii
„f
u'
a
tr
a ~ i e M Y'~
yyyv:
• KieSr~ki,~'', ~ I
ii
'45:
t
,V
' i
0989L
3
a
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the Fort Worth Regional Office of the U. S. Deppart-
ment of Housing and Urban Development has Section 312 Rehabili-
tation loan funds available for distribution to cities certifying
their desire to participate In the Section 312 Program and com-
mitting themselves to paying the administrative costs incurred
in operating the program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
believes it to be in the best interests of the citizens of Denton
to participate in such program; NOW, THEREFORE,
" BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I. That the City of Denton, Texas, hereby certifies
,r•,
its es re to participate in the "Section 312 Program," Section
312 of the Housing Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 14 M as attended, and
hereby commits itself to pay the administrative costs incurred
in the operation of the program.
That Elizabeth Evans, Community Development
41. SECTION It.
" Manager end-Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator of
the Office of Community Development of the City of Denton are
hereby authorized to submit the appropriate application for
Section 312 Rehabilitation loan funds including a copy of this
Resolution therewith.
z ,
Pr SECTION III. This Resolution shall become effective immedi-
f vl ately ups Passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987,
r
MAYOR
AXY
'D CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
d4
L
yG I E
JMIFER fy
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF LENTON, TEXAS +
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ns
BY:'
rt f
f :
l ~
0989L
s
r RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON AUTHORIZING
PARTICIPATION IN THE SECTION 312 PROGRAM OF THE HOUSING ACT OF 1964;
r AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
t WHEREAS, the Fort Worth Regional Office of the U. S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development has Section 312 Rehabilitation loan
funds available for distribution to cities certifying their desire
F; to participate in the Section 312 Program and committing themselves
to paying the administrative costs incurred in operating the
program; and
k;
~t WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, believes
` it to be in the best interests of the citizens of Denton to
x participate in such program; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I. That the City of Denton, Texas, hereby certifies its
desire to participate in the "Section 312 Program," Section 312 of
the Housing Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 1452b., as amended, and hereby
commits itself to pay the administrative costs incurred in the
1, operation of the program.
SECTION II. That Elizabeth Evans, Community Development Manager
,J and Barbara (Foss, Community Development Coordinator of the Office of
Community Development of the City of Denton are hereby authorized to
submit the appropriate application for Section 312 Rehabilitation'
loan funds including a copy of this Resolution therewith.
xt SECTION III. This Resolution shall become effective immediately
upon tsa passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987.
RAY 1. , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS j
ATTEST:
jF
ACTING CITY SECRETARY
C1TY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
a
BYI
} yf`1 y ♦ u..,..i.., ,-i tiw.. _ v'V'.. '4:N :..\I ..JM a. .vi..:ra . it . . ..,♦WFir
T\ is
f
i
i
Ia l
i'
fill
Id
It +
S
~51
H t,.
M
~y~~ IJ r
Y YI FNR
Y I i
.1 . I
S,
H y Y e
S:
t
~ f
4;~ .~y vl
( ; w
{y'~
tlv, S, L { .3; .
~LL
i
u
IY
,X !
Mfr
f
S
E
DATE:2-3-87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
' TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
+ FROM:
w Lloyd ttarrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizAmendmen ing the Mayor to Execute various contracts and
ax ilitation PPro og gr the City's Pazticipation in the Texas Rental
RECOMMENDATION
4 The Planning Department Reomriends approval
SUMMAR Y•
' ,
This resolution will allow Mayor Stephens
r.
Rehabilitation Program documomts to sign all Rental
BACKGROUND:
d The 1984 Texas Rental
si Rehabilitation Program contracts were
gned during Mayor Stewart's term so at the request of Texas Deparbient of Cm raudty Affairs we are authorizing
the
Mayor Stephens to execute program contracts and documents
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:,
! ISCAL IMPACT:
k.~l~ a1 NA
Respect ily submitted:
IF, by: Lloyd Harrell, City
ame
Tit ty Development Manager
I Appro bat
P
a~me Jeff
a T i t l e Dirertgr of Planning & Omminity Development
~ x
44
I
i
•
i
i
r
CITY of DRNTOM
coed Ofte
1108 West Oak
Denlon,Texas 76201
(817) 566444
f Vi' MD1DRAAII]U l
w
~tw DATE: January 28, 1987
Tos Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning & Oamunity neveloprent
F CM: Elizabeth Evans* Community Developw.t Manager
SLWI Section 312 Housing Rehabilitation Program
a
* It
HUD has Section 312 rehabilitation loan funds available. These funds
maybe used for residential and oam ercial rehabiliation within the mea
Target Area. The grant amounts and interest rates vary according to owner
income and project type.
} The MW office will be required to submit oarpleted loan applications v
to HUD for the property owners. There are no administrative costs funded with
r`?;a section 312 funds so the CMG budget would have to pay any expanses incurred,
n The attached resolution is part of the city's application to HUD for
`k possible use of Section 312 funds. if you need any additional information
please call me.
r. •v
A
M~a Elf"I&Ih Evans
a
t )
411FiMRav... maiR.A♦AWFiNnr,rv .aF.u ....a.. ,..xn. ..,w...(q, •4.yd• yy.
F1.
7 t
~1x a r
j ~
1683L
3
"t RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE VARIOUS CONTRACTS
' AND AMENDMENTS RELATING TO THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE TEXAS
RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGR0.
t WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Community Affairs,
administrator for the Texas Rental Rehabilitation Program, has
requested that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing
the Mayor to execute various contracts and amendments relating
to the City's participation in the Texas Rental Rehabilitation
Program; NOW, THEREFORE,
YM r
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute various
r contracts and amendments relating to the City's participation in
' the Texas Rental Rehabilitation Program. Y
SECTION 11.
That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1981.
X44 G
Y E , k OR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
L , I
µ.r p .
CIRROTTE ALLEN, T SECRETARY
~r CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM!
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
ae CITY OF DENTONj TEXAS
r r
by I
`y.~
4 40.01^
fir
S~ v
1.
.l
1
I
3
q.
Y
71
yr
}
1..
;a
s~
r ,
N t-.
s~
a x13' ~ r
a ed `
w r' r
9
y •rw
t
t
4
b
r
Y
F
,
i
i
19431
1
,
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING TWO MEMBERS TO THE INITIAL BOARD OF
MANAGERS FOR THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION DISTRICT; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
a
WHEREAS, Article 1432e, V.A.C,S. provides that two voting
members of the initial Board of Managers of an Emergency
Communication District shall be appointed jointly by all cities
and towns lying wholly or partly with the district; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas wishes to make such
appointments;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City of Denton, Texas hereby appoints i
and as members
' to the Initial oar of Managers o the mergency ommunication
Districtof Denton County.
Jtti SECTION II.
That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987.
RAY j MAYOR
s CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
.i CITY OF-DENTON$ TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAM[ DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: Sim
gyR.+^• _ ..w'w.9Yn.~ar.tiv'+i?i+. r«. .,aA v,,., Y9'-Y1H1V'i~6+:etdtl4'k'-
i
i
R,
1
t
R.
Y
'R k
t
1
11
i.
t
t.
4
dew[
1i
A
T~
e£ ~ ~
kfY X41
f 5
' t..
y
~I I
a a;
'R`~
I
r~_.
ra
r