HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-09-1987
I
j '
AGENDA
CITY OF DEMON CITY COUNCIL
June 9, 1987
Special Call Session of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesday, June 9, 19879 at 5:00 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room V
of the Municipal 3uilding at which the following items will be
considered:
a 5:00 P.M.
1. Receive a report regarding the request of Grace Temple
Baptist Church for a quitclaim and abandonment of
Gregg Street between Ponder and Fulton Streets,
2. Receive a status report regarding the radio system.
3. Hold a discussion concerning the telecommunication
sales tax.
4. Consider approval of an ordinance approving a contract
4~. for the City's participation in the cost of installing
an oversized sewer main; authorizing the Mayor to
execute the contract, and approving the expenditure of
funds.
F
6:01 p.m.
1. Hold a discussion with Dr, Shirley Chater and Mr,
Richard ;ohite regarding short-range and long-range
plans for Texas Woman's University,
6:30 p.m.
1. Executive Session:
A. Le al Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
4; . VTT.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
VATS
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252.17 V.A.T.S.
} 1. Hold a discussion regarding City of Denton
' Board and Commission appointments.
C E R T I F I C A T E
e I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
u bulletin b at the Cit Hall of the City o DelI~~t~on, Texas,
x on the day of , 1987 at CJZJ o'clock
(a.m.) p.tn,
At 1114
2671C
1
I~
p
t
i
i
AGENDA
! CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
June 9, 1987 {
r F
Special Call Session of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesdb), June 9, 1987, at 5:00 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room b
E of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:00 P.M.
1. Receive a report regarding the request of Grace Temple
Baptist Church for a quitclaim and abandonment of
Gregg Street between Ponder and Fulton Streets.
2. Receive a status report regarding the radio system.
3. Hold a discussion concerning the telecommunication
sales tax.
4. Consider approval of an ordinance approving a contract
for the City's participation in the cost of installing
c an oversized sewer gain; authorizing the Mayor to
execute the contract; and approving the expenditure of
funds.
6:00 p.m.
:r
1. Hold a discussion with Dr. Shirley Chater and Mr.
Richard White regarding short-range and long-range
plans for Texas Woman's Univ-rsity.
r
6:30 p.m.
1. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6152.17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V,A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g)s
Art 6252.17 V.A.T.S.
1. Hold a discussion regarding City of Denton
Board and Commission appointments.
C E R T I F I C A T E
r I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
'L bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
' - on the day of 1987 at o'clock
2671C -`-CITY SECRETARY-"`-
.
~e
growing
lit
gMCC
a ,p
gnice temige baptist ehurrch
Roe 14flemmde, D Min.
~ Arstor
Rog~eer W. Noldor
Coolote Pallor
i
RandatlBardin March 12, 1987
Minister of "dusk i
Now Doullwn
Minister of Collese
ScottLarq+ton Mr. David Ellison, Chairman
MlnbterofYouth Development/Review Committee
a DslorlsVser City of Denton
minister ofPresohoot/
Chlhfren ply E. McKinney
Denton, TK 76201
t.
Dear Mr. Ellison' t.
RE' Request regarding Gregg Streat
" Grace Temple Baptist Church of Denton is 'iereby requesting tho city
of Denton to close and give a quitclaim deed to Gregg Street between
Ponder Street and Fulton Street.
The reasons for this action being granted are as followst
1) Croce Temple Baptist Church owns the property on both sides
of Gregg Streat between Ponder and Fulton (see exhibit A). It
would not interfere with any entries to any property that is not
owned by Grace Temple 1Sap:ist Church, hereafter referred to as GT8C.
2) In the near future plans are being made to build on educational
building immediately behind the present educational building and
sanctuary. With the building of this building, it will increase
pedestrian traffic across Gregg Street, not only on Sunday, but also
during the entire week because of the weekday ministries that GTBC
` carries on. With this, the possibility of a pedestrian-vehicle
a accident increases.
GTBC is also in the process of obtaining more property that will
surround the immsdiste church area, which means that we can
nA continue to comply with the parking mandates, and at the same time,
the residance need for Gregg Street diminishes.
is
{
1106 west oah Menton, texas 76201 (817) 387.6137
j Page 2
I, Mr. Ellison
March 12, 1987
`r
in exce
3) We at the present time operate a day-care at GTBC. We have
Children being
j one hundred children at all times from 6:rmful sit before 30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m-
chtVran, they are pronNotonalplanstEorathis, butuweiare realisticyenoughn
guess that they will, fore ;t would provide a safeguard
to know that these things happen. There , and an
for the arriving childreni departinj seems as if
unsuspecting mote
the action would be a judicious one. g
eal 19 of trsons
4) coupled with this previous wenaresinha high ity rmul studtiefamilq de lling area. 4
presently using Gregg Street, to Statistics tell k
we have many of the houses rented to Univeents.
us that this igluCesagegroup that tends trate lthem iin the high incident
Street, t
"aggressive Insurance liel
group. With this being th9 composition of the average veer of Gregg n who ate filled we have coupled the worst of independence childre abandonmentwteals
e in the Euture.
d antur a
ome here i
an av
The combination is bound to cruse a problem somew
it violations count is for the area surrounding
am not sure what the moving
Oak, Welch, Gregg and other neat-by streets in this are e, but I suspect that
they are sufficient to warrant a strong and anticipating action in the matter
of closing tha streets
3) We °uggested that perhaps taking a count might be a visa thing to do
concerning this patter. This would give a somewhat more accurate indication
of the use of Gregg street to pick up theirfchildren fthe romtdayecare.
parents who drive
Ws bof course, ack on provide or Pulton,and a method to safely
ge
6) There has been a concern about emergency vehicles' use of this streets mos
prop One Of the cthins that hurch will would be lot,owith ampleerty
behind t these cocld F
In an emergency,
aetrys and exits for use by the congregation.
be used for getting to a fire or other emergency situation.
Another concern is the close corner at Ponder and Gregg which did,llows a
piece of firs-fighting equipment from making the corner without turning an
then street backing designated again, as an emergency thoroughfareill be gained by having a
44
i
t
rtrt r r:,-...
e
r.
a
i
a
i Page 3
y Mr. Ellison
March 12, 1987
a short street. It is only tour blocks long, and GTBC
7) Gregg Street Is
owns all the property surrounding one of those fcur blocks. If one comes
up Welch and must go back to the east, then to Congrese and come all the
way back to Gregg that too by automobile odometer, .05 tenths of a mile.
peopleway. It is our belief
that many of the
This itl will d not l inconeenience minute all or so out
that
Of course, Gregg Street dead-ends at Ponder. Therefore, the traffic
to the west will only be that which comes from Oak and th;ts iarea. Ftyl
llustrated by
Bryan, Normal and Jagoe streets are not crossed by Gregg
the map (see exhibit B).
f
8) There is, from the maps tare hat that serves the houses of
utility considerations. The e p P.esent
J down Ponder will not be needee, because GBTC owns those houses and intends
to rase them and subsequentl~• pave those areas for parking. Other than GTBC,
the only other line that seems to serve a build couldsethe one to thedFraternity
house that is located at Fulton and Oak.
behind the house on the continuance of Gregg or on Oak Street.
T;;a only o.ber service shown is the sever that serves the facilities of GTBC
alone. Therefore, services should not be a problem.
Finslly, if this ebandoruaent and quitclaim is not granted, we do reequestand
the city to take under advisement the concept of installing speed bumps
hays a clor,r patrolling of that area.
We believe the need is real, we believe the request is not unrealistic, that
it will cteste a minimum of inconveniences and that the benefits will bs
overwhelming. I know tbak this is a difficult decisions but we believe that
it is a prudent decision. These are the reasons and rationale for our
request for the closing and quitclaim of Gregg Street between Ponder and
Fulton.
Respectfully submiltted,
LBt~9t Ii. • ..7
r AAna L. Fellamende
RI/bb
a
i
1 '
r 4
~ e
EXHIBIT A
1
i
A4,~t5r~S CLYr.rccp 4 ioN
I
1
a T 6 c
N
PARKING
LOTS
1P " r ~ tlfl~n~ r.
1 J L01
~ t~ Q 2
W ~ O
x m J
r
n' r V 4'.
t. a. vvy ___yvv
GREGG
Will
1~s 4'I t61111A Eaucjt+on
Lai Ftn+~rr I~~ro~n~
r. ,
Ctnrtf
r
S~ntrunr f11
Houtt
i
• PVFitk`Yprr O W r.R we. &I). i . , "
y
r
I
j EXHIBIT B
i
' t
c
i
I
M1
Y
E88 .a . S.E,
PA
AN E O
> > KORY 4- Z
y
1
f
I
1
i
I
b
•t
' .1 1.
r I.
n r 'rl +bi
I '
A
r ~tFv ~ ~ 'i
r
> r ~ ~rl
I
Klr ^1C {!1 f`{
1 ;Y a 4
1~1 r - 0 J
! F J I.
v ~ Yr J. ¢
%
ur
~ I
L O C A T I O N
t~ MAP
~ r
i 11
1
x,Y~i app r i ~ ~
yr,
~ , wt v 1 Itl
~ r ~ II
1 y~.
w ^
ca~~. r
{
' r3
y 'sl4
i
oil
14 11 it 11
Val Aft I
s '-„r---
r
-6 71~
26
1 ,
F
t S
s I ~ is ~ 11 ,
3 t., 1 F
1
i 61 1 I - t 27 i._. 1._.i
'to a - E
r- I 24
no a e 13
1 I t
1 / li~~ _ Ls J4 M 1 LS is Ir l/ is Id 13 f2t
i.e TI F r t l I.I l 2d 13 -Ml 'is I.
OF T w If V
14 1 3 4 5
tj 13
c is
to it I is I n a d ~I 1
14 t 49 IN
T
4 ~ Q•G
t t
® r w C'9 w
Mir
;F..
1 ' ~ ~ t i S / T t t I~ I 2 S tit I L I 2 ~ 1 t t { S
~,..-a _ ; a I 1133x"' ' :1~ _ ,ti- rr ru
• 14 0 0 4 H q 1.•---.-., I 1 d T d S i le A A 6 N 13 S It II 1'1 q 9 I
go 2. al-A m
S:
- ...mow...
lop
I ~ b
I t t 3 ~1• 1 1 'rZ 3 d ! t a
/ trSl►lrt ! 1
a
53~ • 92
I - I
TL n
• I 21 I 21
14 4 IS til: II }IIo ~E !t~ 1/ a7 ITI a 17 t '.IKFt,s ~x-13rr
1 20
I i
Kim
r
it Fj 7 ai e, •11 N 141
11 I! d, tl / - I',.
,I i t [ 11
r~ I: 1 1
~ t ~II 10 + { 1 I 1 IT
Z1
,i
Bold Vltlon ° X
it ti,, . "f".o~"~,i ~..a..,al !.~~;~~~~~L, I~.-_._SCr`i'•.,,. ._A•~.ti r~ .
~iM ~ f ' ~ ~~/~'{s r ~ ~~5•. !y 1\~a fr~1'.`~'1i a~ •1~1Y;
Nil
or 'If, AN~ -
21
431
I/
liwillin
'IF
VIP
..~T •~~`5 ` r 1 I .mow LL~w 5. \
I
Y
t
i.
F
..n rn ,js Y,i,.0,5'Y M!(~'Ny 4• ZiiY1W/6 ,
o..n./Yw.Y.a/~1~••'•m.w rw.wl.. rv.. rw..rrw..aMYaor:H[dN.fma..apn..w wv.._.. .a.
a
F 6 \ ! ' ,i
i
AuorTaA u~;•
110 ell,
10
/ .
.
r 1 ~4 1 /
y 9/
1L
100,
r .
. L_
CHURCH ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT
~
nkwm
THE SUNDAY SCHOOL BOARD OF lY'
THE SOUTHERN AAPTIST CONVENTION "ovum. 3t s ~ n~ro
MA HVILI! TENNESSEE =
too
I
1
,i
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS Mu,kIICIPAL BUILDiNO / DENTON, TEXAS 18201 / TELEPHONE f817) 688.8301
Office of its aly Manager
r `it
MEMORANDUM
TOt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
S; FROMt Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATEI June 50 1987
SUSJECTt Latest Update on 800 MHz Radio System
We are continuing our efforts to secure the initial involvement in the
system. As we told you in the past weal, we have approximately 40 radi_r
j^ committed by letter and approximately 52 committed verbally. This continues
to make us believe that we will have enough money to fund our first year
^s ,y payment which will begin in fiscal year 87/88. ;
Today, we net with the County. We had a very productive meeting with :f
Sheriff Xaiener, two of bit staff people, and Ms. Nita Starnes, the purchasing
agent for the County. We left the meeting feeling that there was an interest
s~pF in working through some kind of agreement or participation in the system with
the County. We feel that it would mean there would be a substantial
°
lnvatnent by the County and rhis would help us in thooe second and third
years. We would do this either through them participating in our system or
+ setting up a joint system in which they would pay us for the use of the
backbone system. These plans, along with the very conservative estimate of
other entities joining the system, provide the attached 10 year income
r scenario. I have also attached the ^joee liberal suggestions that we made in
N April. There is s marked difference between the two. Frankly, I think we
overestimated the response in the first memo. Because rf this overestimation,
we have scaled our program back. In the original proposal to you, we
estimated substantial amounts of money to be used each year to help us convert
and grow. Under this new scenario, we will certainly not be able to do that
" in the early years. of the program. This means that we will not make
err,,. conversions as fast. It also means that if divisions and departments want to
f move faster, they will have to fund their portions of the system out of their
operating budgets rather than out of this financing plan.
1'+ s Our payments will also change. In our visits with First Southwest, they are
suggesting that we go with an equal principle payment which makes our interest
a; payments more in the beginning. This also has a negative effect on our
ability to pay. However, David Medanich has advised us that these CO's would
be received in market much more favorably. Also, that is the reason we will
c', be making a payment in 87/880
i
4
800 HHz Radio System
June 5, 1987
Page two
1
These coneervarive participation estimates and the new payment schedules make
the proposed system lees attractive. However, if we do not participate iu the
system, we will still be faced with all the radio problems that we have now.
You may recall that we scheduled for $40,000 to be spent this year for the
! police system. We have severe problems in tF, Fire Department as well its
problems in other divisions and departments. We will spend ai ntifca,t
amounts of money in the next few years if we do not begin implement-anon ')f
this Lyatem. These amcunte of money will not significantly improve the
uystem, they will not give it any further range or any better reception in
most instances, and we will have lost our only chznce to implement a system
that can be used in a county-wide program.
pn( tI
Staff still continues to re.ommend to you that we begin installation of this
system by selling the CO's. Since we have experienced a radical change '.n our
LY:' expected m rticipation and interest, we have looked at alternate ways to fund
i this system. We feel so strongly about implementing this system that we have
found a back-up way of insuring that the f.:pmest schedules do cot have a more
significant effect on the General .fund. Bob Nelson has indicated that he
would certainly recommend using utility funds tr% supplement our payments in
order to keep the effects at the estimated levels and at the same time insure
that the system is implemented. '+e are currently etploring other alternati.e
` ways of funding, We think there might be other Kaye that we could also
maintain the projected impacts on the general fund to insure payment for the
rtf~i,{{ system.
;I In conclusion, we are still tAcommending the system to you. We have taken e
much more conb-irvative appt)ach which means that our participation funding
levels will be LurtsiJ_.. ::t will mean that we may not be able to convert
g oath and m replacements will
assumptions s such tas i having Additional money also
r not be able to le realised. We still believe this system will serve us well
i in the next 15 to 20 years. We believe it is essential for us to continue to
provide the levels of service that we row have. It will eliminate payments,
replacement costa, and additions to our existing system which will do nothing
to improve the system. Finally, it will provide u!t an avenue to provide
county-wide comsunication to many entities in order for us to provide better
services.
M If yoJ or the iouncll hate any further questions, I will be happy to try and
respond to them at the meeting on Tuesday.
" ` •
R c ve a
Deputy City Hanagey
YA NJ f;<
Attachmente
3502H
'{~.41ri+.W`AJ~.//'N~.UP.'w9C.•'.n. a 1 ;
J r
. lh
i
i
10 'YEAR FUNDING y
9
Revenue Shortfall Payment Requirement
87-88 = 963000 9 -0- $ 899375
88-89 136,000 669500 2020500
89-90 769000 117,500 1939500
90-91 88,500 96,000 184,500
91-92 780250 97,250 175,500
92-93 80,250 86,250 166,500
93-94 84}750 77 7;0 1620500
94-95 86,500 66,625 153,125 r;
' 95-96 870000 56,750 143,750
96-97 92,50? 412875 134,373
p j
!r I
.i
I
i
r S
Assumptions
j C.O. $150,000 's
General Fund Replacements 4
(12.5 radios/year) 37,500
General Fund Growth 33%/year z
i (3 radios/year) 12,000
TOTAL COST Approximately 3200,000/year
TEN YEAR SCENARIO (ORIGINAL)
Year Cost/Repayment Radios on System Revenues Shortfall
87-88 2009000 550 200,000 0
88-89 200,000 700 73,500 126,5008 i
89-90 2003000 850 1090500 909500
90-91 2000000 900 960500 103,500
91-92 h00,000 950 1089500 511500
92-93 200,000 975 1089250 91,750
r 93-94 200,000 1000 1089000 92,000
14 94-95 2009000 1025 120,250 79,750
95-96 200,000 1050 1269250 73,750
{ 96-97 200,000 1075 132,250 67,750
a+ 97-98 -0- 1075 900000
u k 98-99 -0- 1075 549000
99-00 42,000
t#;f, 00-01 300000
01-02 24,000
f 02-03 180000
-03-04 12,000
s
t; 04-05 61000
886,500 (Use 40,000 in 86197 Police Budget)
rf
R
1
E
SHORT FALL SPLITS (ORIGINAL)
Year Cost Utilities General Fund Enterprise
l
87-88 -0-
88-89 86,500 28,545 449980 12,975
89-90 90,500 29,865 47,060 131575
"
90-91 103,500 34,155 530820 15,525
r
91-92 910500 30,195 479580 13,725
y. 92-93 91,750 300277 47,711 13,762 ;
' 93-94 92,000 30,360 479840 13,800
94-95 77,750 269318 410470 11,962
95-96 73,750 24,338 380350 11,062
'l K M 96-97 67,750 22,358 350230 10,162
u
r
i yy F r
~er h )
S ~
r~
i
yy ~ 33
°•.I' a
#_K.~
z. r
h S r~ .'Ic
6 ,
k 3502M
! k r
•a,~ti tF
ri•
P
1
,r
r
y'
t
SHORTFALL SPLITS
General
Cost Utilities Fund Enterprise
87-88 -0- -0- -0- -0-
88-89 S 669500 $21,950 $349575 9 99975
89-90 117,500 38,175 61,100 17,625
90-91 969000 31,680 49,920 14,400
91-92 97,250 32,100 50,575 14,575
92-93 86,250 289500 449850 12,900
T ?3-94 77,750 25,650 40,425 11,675
ter
. t 94-95 66,625 22,000 34,650 9,975
95-96 56,750 18,725 29,500 80525
96-97 41,875 13,825 21,775 6,275
w.
Ata ~ s i ,
4 ~s
_a
f 4 }
4 ,
I
V* 4
t
y
f 1y
p[
f~ 5 F,
1
~yra
" 3302M
f
'JTV*fVENTON,TSXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON,TEXAS 16t01 / TELEPHONE (81?) U6-SM
M E M O R A N D U M
3
t' DATES June S, 1987
TOi Lloyd V. karrell, City manager
FRCMr John F. McOrane, Executive Director for Finance
SUBJECTI RE9
EAL OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SALES TAX EXEMPTION
State Law
provides that telecommunication services are subject to state sales
tax but are exempt from all local sales taxed however, the law also states
that if a city wants to apply its local sales tax to telecommunications, it
e r,a may repeal that exemption. The soonest the City may implement aich sales tax
if October 10 1987, if we want to do this we must notify the State
Comptroller by June 30, 1967, The procedure for repealing the exemption
t r„` placing our local sales tax on telecommunications would be as followai
1, The Council adopts an ordinan = to repeal the local sales
r ; tax exemption on telecommunication services, We have a copy
of a sample ordinance from the State Comptroller Office and
have referred It to Legal for possible consideration on
Tuesday, June 16, 1987.
' 7, The vote on the ordinance is entered into the minutes of Y.
City Council.
3 A copy of the ordinance is sent to the state Comptcolle N s
by U,S, registered or certified mail,
4, After the State Comptroller receives the notice, one full
calendar quarter must elapse, The repeal of the exemption
then takes effect as the tax is imposed on the first day of
the next calendar quarter,
,
i
2
p.
j
Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell
June 5, 1987
page two
it is my opinion that the reason for the one full quarter waiting period is to
allow the telephone companies enough time to reprogram their billing process
in order to allow for the sales tax collection. I believe It also alloys the
state Comptroller's Office to gear up for those collections. If we were to
pass the ordinance by June 30 and decide not to collect it at a future date, z
think we would have to allow one full calendar quarter for the same processes
to be reversed.
IE I can glue you any further information, please advise.
F (
p
Ile
hn P. McCrane
{
l 25297
ti
1. L I
IT , Tr:
y k",
" S
(1
t
T~ Y
T y
7r
r{ a
r i•
I I
y +`1 i
'1
}A
J'
+I~
• OkM.b AE1A h.Td ,Sp:;ti. _ ..v.,. .-w , t:.li. .a .,yxAl
1793L
NO.
j AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN
THE COST OF INSTALLING AN OVERSIZED SEWER MAIN; AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT; APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Denton wishes to enter into an agreement
participate in the cost of providing an oversized sewer main;
and
WHEREAS, the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council ,
approve all expenditures $10,000 or more and Section 2,09 of the
City Charter requires every act of the Council providing for the Y
expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall
" be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HERESY ORDAINS:
r. ,
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby approves the Sewer
k Main Parpation Agreement, attached hereto, between the City
and Texas Instruments, Inc. to provide for the City's partici-
pation in the cost of providing an oversized sewer main in
accordance with said agreement and the Mayor is hereby authorized
to execute the agreement on behalf of the City,
~ n F+' 6 5 f'
SECTION II. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure
of funs In He manner and amount as specified in the agreement. r'
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1987.
4
fi
hri a ar:
}
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
iUl .
` JE NIFER LTERS, MY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAM1 DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS '
e i
L n e
~ A-
' Y
r
1793L
s
7
MAIN COST PARTICIPATION
THE STATE OF TEXAS S SEWER M
NT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON
COUNTY OF DENTON S AND TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC.
WHEREAS, Texas Instruments, Inc., hereafter referred to as
"Developer," whether one or more, whose business address is P. 0.
Box 225214 MS 399, Dallas, ?exas 75265, wishes to develop and
improve certain real property located in the City of Denton,
Texas or its extraterritorial jurisdiction, and is required to
provide such property with adequate sewer by designing, f
constructing and installing a sewer main of a minimum inside
diameter of twelve inches (1211), hereafter referred to as
"required facilities"; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation
located. at 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas 76201, hereafter
referred to as "City," in accordance with its ordinances, wishes
to participate in the cost of the construction and installation
of said sewer main to provide for an "oversized" sewer main to
E~ expand its utility system and insure adequate utility service to
other customers;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
r. covenants contained herein, Developer and City agree as follows:
1. Developer shall design, install and construct an eighteen
(181) and twenty-four (2411) sewer main and all necessary appurte-
nances thereto, hereafter referred to as "oversized facilities",
located as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
2. Prior to beginning construction of the oversized facil-
ities, Developer shall enter into a Development Contract, as
required by Appppendix A of the Code of Ordinances of City. This
agreement shall be subject to and governed by such Development
Contract, which is incorporated herein by reference, and any
other applicable ordinances of City.
3. Prior to beginning construction of the oversized facil-
ities, Developer shall obtain, at Developer's sole cost and
' expense, all necessary permits, licenses and easements. If
easements are needed, the deeds therefore obtained by Developer
shall be reviewed and approved as to form and substance by City
prior to the beginning of construction. If Developer is unable
to acquire needed easements, Developer shall provide City with
k
h
j
APPROVAL COPY
r.
A
Y
r'
any requested documentation of efforts to obtain such easements, e
including evidence of negotiations and reasonable offers made to
the effected property owners. Any easements for the oversized
facilities obtained by the Developer shall be assigned to City,
if not taken in City's name, prior to acceptance of the over-
sized facilities, ate-Developer--vtarrar}Es--c}ear-_EitlB_to~uch e,.)
eaaea<ent3 ~an~-Mil l-defend--Ci-ty --agai n s t_ any __advar se-H a I &-m2de
a ga l*s-t--such-+i t l-ems-. s
4. The City's share in the cost of the oversized facilities,
based upon the difference in the cost of installing required
facilities, as determined by City by public bids on the sane or
similar projects on a per linear foot basis, and the cost of the
oversized facilities, as determined by the City, based upon the
amount of a bid from the lowest responsible bidder on the same or
similar oversized facilities, shall be in an amount not to exceed
One Hundred lhirty Eight Thousand Three Hundred Dollars
($138,300.00), and City shall not, in any case, be liable for an
~ Y
additional cost because of delays in beginning, continuing or
completing construction; changes in the price or cost of
materials, supplies, or labor; unforeseen or unanticipated cost
because of topography, soil, subsurface, or other site
conditions; differences in the calculated and actual per linear
feet of pipe or materials needed for the oversized facilities;
Developer's decision as to the contractors or subcontractors used
w- to perform the work; or any other reason or cause, specified or
unspecified, relating to the construction of the oversized
facilities.
S. Within thirty (30) days of the acceptance of the facilities
L by the City, Developer shall submit to the City's Director of
Utilities the actual cost of the oversized facilities. Should
the actual cost of the oversized facilities be less than the cost
on which the City's share was determined, the City's share of the
cost shall be reduced proportionally, on a per linear foot basis,
based upon the difference of the actual cost of the oversized
facilities and the determined cost for required facilities. To
determine the actual cost of the oversized facilities, City shall
have the r! ht to inspect any and all records of Developer, his
agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors and shall have
the right to require Developer to submit any necessary Informa-
tion, documents, invoices, receipts or other records to verify
the actual cost of the oversized facilities.
6. Within thirty (30) days of the date the Developer has
submitted satisfactory documentation of the actual cost of the
oversized facilities, as determined by City, City shall pay to
Developer its share of the cost thereof,
' SEWER MAIN COST PARTICIPATION AGREE}.PENT/TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC.
PAGE 2
IVA,
:r,
I
i
7. All notices, payments or communications to be given or
made pursuant to this agreement by the parties hereto, shall be
sent to Developer at the business address given above and to the
Director of Utilities for the City at the address given above.
e
8. Developer shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any
and all claims, damages, 10s3 or liability of any kind whatso-
ever, by reason of injury to property or persons occasioned by
any act or omission, neglect or wrongdoing of Developer, its
officers, agents, employees, invitees, contractors or other
persons with regard to the performance of this agreement, and
Developer will, a its own cost and expense, defend and protect
City against any and all such claims and demands.
9. If Developer does not begin substantial construction of
the oversized facilities within twelve (12) months of the
effective date of this agreement, this agreement shall terminate.
' 10. This instrument embodies the whole agreement of the
z ! parties hereto and there are no promises, terms, conditions or
obligations other than those contained herein. This agreement
shall supercedlverbaliorswrcommuncationss itt ni between the parties hereto.
either
agreements,
, 11. This agreement shall not be assigned by Developer without
the express written consent of City.
12. Any and all suits for any breach of this contract, or any
other suit pertaining to or arising out of this contract, shall
be brought and maintained in a court of competent jurisdiction
in Denton County, Texas.
~ M1ti k.'
' Executed this the day of , 1987•
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC., OWNER w
Lewis McMahan
Vice President
ATTEST: Corporate Staff
0
i
SEWER MAIN COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC. S
PAGE 3
l; neon ♦
i •
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
AY ST , MNYOR
xy °ATTEST:
J~ ' L
*C f JENNIFER ALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
,A^ ;I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
v.
{ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: ' "rr
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
d CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
4
d ,y•tir
ti v114
S
ROUTE P.PPROVEO: INIT. DATE
w ~C Proi, kngr ~rY'
' a Corp. Pic,
Doll Mgr.
->Qj yN .
A 1 '
Cy j x' a N Legal qh
97
1a
i
t Insurance S
r
~p i )i Y
t' e
SEWER MAIN COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC6
PAGE 4
,,4 LI f
r'
"S
1 rl '.11VaA A;?Wk.u.. wi : . " r. r eMny~~?.tiY
7 v
r ,
LOOP 261
1 r
: r
-wit
1611 WhTLA
A
,a
r r
rly E r
v
J
V~ r ~ II [Iy + / VR
l' Yat V ' v f / w ! I ~ k ~~t
1 rs/
h
Y
/ fe
~Ls
r ~J
. 1 k~r 8y fYw47
.
LOOP all
IL
~ 11
\ 1 1 1 ~ i
1 ,
7.4" XAut
%
11f ff
N
N111 i ~ n,
, 1 4
wj~
END
1
1
Ft t
0 F
i
I
f
{
1
1
I F
4i
SAO . .q
~yn1 F j
FRM;