HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-16-1987
:i
~t
r
AGENDA
CITY OF PENTON CITY COUNCIL
June 16, 1987
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tussda ,
June 16, 1987, at 5:15 p.m, in ti.e Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be considered as part of the Agenda for the
Regular Meeting,
5:15 P.M.
1. Executive Session:
A. Leggal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art. 6252.17
s V,A.T,S,
p B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f),, Art. 6252-17 y
y y> V,A,T.S.
1. Hold a discussion on a proposal to be
Vi,,Y( submitted to the Denton Humane Society for
the construction and operation of an Animal
Adoption Center - land-lease negotiations,
~r
1 C. Personnel/Board Apppointments Under Sec. 2(g),
` Art 62S2.17 V,A.T.S.
o
Hold a discussion of possible annexation of Rector
Subdivision described as i 15.234 acre tract located
in the B. Burleson Survey No. 6S and the J. Ayers
Survey No. 2 and situated west of 1.35 at and
north of
%y the intersection of Recto Road.
3. Hold a discussion of proposed annexation of Mingo
Industrial Tract Subdivision described as a 6,6 acre
tract located in the Morreau Forest Survey No. 417 at
F the northeast corner of Mingo Road and North Cooper
Creek Road,
4. Hold a discussion of zoning requests for 830.2 acres
~t (Lakeview) and 425,4 acres (Southview).
51 Receive a report on the scheduling of the new fire
station constructior.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
June 16, 1987 at 7:00 p,m, In the Council Chambers of the
V. Municipal Buiidi:,g at which the following items will be
a,
considered:
7:00 p,m.
t.
J Consider approval of the ainutes of the regular
meeting of June 2, 1987 and the special call meeting
of June 9, 1987,
a„,kx
t:
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 16, 1987
Page 2
receive and tabulate bids for purchase of $1.1 million
t 2.
City of Denton Certificates of Obligation, Serios
1987-A.
3. Public Hearings
A. Consider a petition of Jack Price and John
Serdar, representing the Psychiatric Institute of
America, requesting approval of an amended
detailed plan for a 4.849 acre planned
development (PD-1). The property is located at
2026 West University Drive and shown in the
Robert Beaumont Survey, Abstract No. 31. A
psychiatric hospital is currently under
construction at this loc4tion. If, approved, the
amendment will permit the construction of an
addition containing eight (8) physicians'
offices, a receptionist space, a waiting area,
and two group rooms. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.) 2-1854
l. dAdotion of etailed plan ordinance nc a approving acre an amended
planned
development (PD-1). B. Hold a public hearing concerning the or annexation of 212.12 acres being a part of the I,
Coy Survey, Abstract No. 212; J. Ayers Survey,
Abstract No. 2; B. Burleson Survey, Abstract No.
6S; N. Coker Survey, Abstract No. 249; and the R.
Johnson Survey, Abstract No. 666. (A-46)
C. Hold a public hearing concerning the request of
Grace Temple Baptist Church for a quitclaim and
abandonment of Gregg Street between Ponder and
Fulton Streets. (Q-67)
1. Consider a Potion directing the City
59
Attorney to prepare documents for the
abandonment and quitclaim of Gregg Street
I between Ponder and Fulton Streets.
4. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 16, 1987
Page 3
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items S.A, S.B). This listing is provided
on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any
item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids and Purchase Ordcrs:
1. Bid 197S1 - Office Operating Supplies
2. Bid 19754 - Padmounted Switchgear -
3. Bid 19758 - Diffusers, Water
4. 1Bid 19752 - Lillian Miller Parkway Paving 8
Drainage
B. Plats and Replats
1. Consider ap roval of preliminary and final
repla
t of tot f Lot 10 of the Ponder Addition,
(Th
e Planning and Zon.ng Commission
recommends approval.)
S. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
B.. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
3 competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
issuance, sale and delivery of City of Denton
Certificates of Obli anon, Series 1987-A, and
approving and aut orizing instruments and
procedures relating thereto.
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the
Taxation Chapter of the Code of Ordinances by the
Safi addition of Section 22-6 thereto relating to
taxation of telecommulcations services.
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and Denton
County Electric Cooperative, -Inc. for the
purchase of electrical equipment and facilities.
K
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 16, 1987
Page 4
i
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance adding Sections
14-76 and 14.77 to Article VI of Chapter 14
"Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions" of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas;
providirg for local fees 3s authorized by the
Texas Alcohol and Beverage Code Section 11,38, as
amended; providing for a penalty clause;
providing a severability clause; and providing
for an effective date.
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Chapter One of the Code of Ordinances oy the
addition of Article II thereto prescribing
qualifications for members of Boards and
Commissions of the City of Denton. ,
' , py
6. Resolutions
A. Consider approval of a resolution by the City of
r.~ Denton, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to
sign and submit an amendment to the amended
statement submitted November 26, 1986, to the
Department of Housing and Urban Development of a
final statement of objectives and projected use
of funds with appropriate verifications, as
authorized and required by the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.
7. Receive the Utility Department's Five Year Capital
Improvements Plan for fiscal year 1988-1992.
8. Receive the Planning and Zoning Commission's
recommendation for a Five Year Capital Improvements
Plan.
9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager
10. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
. 1' 11. Now Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas,
12. Executive Session:
;i.
A. Leggal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252.17
s V.A.T,S#
If
T T
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 16, 1987
Page 5
1. Discuss Denton County vs, the City of Denton.
B, Real Estate Under Sec. 2(fArt, 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(9)0
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Hold a discussion regarding Board and
Commission appointments.
C E R T I F I C A T E
i certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin oa at the Cit Hall of the City o Den on, Texas,
on the day of , 1987 at o'clock i
(a.m.) .m. f
POW
CI SECRETARY E
26760
Y S
jY16
h
r
r
r ,
4 N
4 / Y Y
s rp
,f!
.p ;
r
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
June 16, 1987
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday
E June 16, 1987, at 5:15 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the
f Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may I
also be considered as part of the Agenda for the
Regular Meeting.
5:15 P.M.
1. Executive Session:
A. Leggal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
Y,A,T,S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
I
1. Hold a discussion on a proposal to be
submitted to the Denton Humane Society for
the construction and operation of an Animal
Adoption Center - land-lease negotiations,
E C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 Y.A.T.S.
2. Hold a discussion of possible annexation of Rector
Subdivision described as a IS.234 acre tract located
rr r in the B, Burleson Survey No. 65 and the J. Ayers
Survey No. 2 and situated west of 1.35 at and north of
i` the intersection of Rector Road,
3. Hold a discussion of proposed annexation of Mingo
Industrial Tract Subdivision described as a 6.6 acre
tract located in the Morreau Forest Survey No. 417 at
the northeast corner of Mingo Road and North Cooper
Creek Road.
4. Hold a discussion of zoning requests for 830.2 acres
(Lakeview) and 425.4 acres (Southview).
S. Receive a report on the scheduling of the new fire
station construction,
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
June 16, 1987 at 7:00 p,m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of June 2, 1987 and the special call meeting
of June 9, 1987,
4
i
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 16, 1987
Page 2
i
2. Receive and tabulate bids for purchase of $1.1 million !
City of Denton Certificates of obligation, Series
1987-A,
3. Public Bearings
A. Consider a petition of Jack Price and John
Serdar, representing the Psychiatric Institute of
America, requesting approval of an amended
detailed plan for a 4,849 acre planned
development (PD-1). The property is located at
2026 West University Drive and shown in the
Robert Beaumont Survey, Abstract No. 31. A
psychiatric hospital is currently under
construction at this location. If approved, the
amendment will permit the construction of an
addition containing eight (8) physicians, t
offices, a receptionist space, a waiting area,
and two group rooms. (The Planning and Zoning,
Commission recommends approval.) Z-1854
`r
1. Adoption of ordinance approving an amended f~f
detatted plait for a 4.849 acre planned i
development (PD-1).
B. Hold a public hearing concerning the roposed
annexation of 212.12 acres being a Co Survey, Abstract No, g part of the 1,
Abstract , 2; B. Burleson 1Sur e.y,AAbstract Survey,
j 6S; N. Coker Survey, Abstract No. 249; and the R.
' Johnson Survey, Abstract No. 666. (A-46)
C. Hold a public hearing concerning the request of
Grace Temple Baptist Church for a quitclaim and
I abandonment of Gregg Street between Ponder and
Fulton Streets. (Q-67)
1. Consider a motion directing the City
Attorney to prepare documents for the
abandonment and quitclaim of Gregg Street
between Ponder and Fulton Streets.
4. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or h;s designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommcidations.
1
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 16, 1987
Page 3
i ,
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 5 A, S.B), This listing is privided
on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any
item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders: f
1. Bid 09751 - Office Operating Supplies I
2. Bid 09754 - Padmounted Switchgear
3. Bid 09758 - Diffusers, Water III'
4. #Bid 09752 - Lillian Miller Parkway Paving E
Drainage
I
B. Plats and Replats
1. Consider approval of preliminary and final
+ replat of Lot 10 of the Ponder Addition,
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
5. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance ,accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements. i
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
;r issuance, sale and delivery of City of Denton
Certificates of Obligation, Series 1987-A, and
approving and authorizing instruments and
procedures relating thereto.
D. U nsider adoption of an ordinance amending the
Taxation Chapter of the Code of Ordinances by the ;
addition of Section 22.6 thereto relating to
taxation of telecommuications services.
E. Consider e.doption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and Denton
County Electric Cooperative, Inc. for the
purchase of electrical equipment and facilities.
City of Dentor. City Council Agenda
June 16, 198;
Page 4
i
t ~
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance adding Sections
14-76 and 14-77 to Article VI of Chapter 14
s
"Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions" of the
Code of Ordinance.. of the City of Denton, Texas; ?
Providing for local fees as authorized by the i
Texas Alcohol and Beverrge Code Faction 11,38, as
amended; providing for a penalty clause;
providing a severability clause; and providing
for an effective date.
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Chapter One of the Code of Ordinances by the
addition of Article ]I thereto prescribing
qqualifications for members of Boards and
Commissions of the City of Denton.
6. Resolutions
a A. Consider approval of a resolution by the City of
Denton, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to
i
`I sign and submit an amendment to the amended
statement submitted November 26, 19869 to the
Department of Housing and Urban Development of a
final statement of objectives and projected use
of funds with appropriate verifications, as
authorised and required by the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.
7. Receive the Utility Department's Five Year Capital
Improvements Plan for fiscal year 1988-1992.
I
8. Receive the Planning and Zoning Commission's
recommendation for a Five Year Capital Improvements
plan.
9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager
10. official Action on Executive Session Items: '
A. Legal Matters
B, Real Estate
0. Personnel
F' D. Board Appointments
11. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest Items for future agendas,
1
12. Executive Session:
A. i
Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(c), Art. 6252.17
V.A.T.S.
,,1
t
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
June 16, 1987
Page 5
1. Discuss Denton County Vs, the City of Denton.
IIi
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17
V,A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
9
1, Hold a discussion regarding Board and I
Commission appointments.
:r
i
C E R T I F I C A T E
f
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
Iq bulletin board at the City Hall nf the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1987 at o'clock
I
CITY SECRETARY
2676C
i
I
~r
i
I
i',
~I
71
~i
A
~ I
s
Ii
1. '
7
A ~
w.
.A
.A
I
i f
1
j CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT DATE: 06/16/87
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
f 3°
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager pG..
IE
SUBJECTi DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ANNEXATION OF RECTOR SUBDIVISION DESCRIBED AS
A 15,234 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE B. BURLESON SURVEY NO. 65 ANDTB THEE
J, AYERS SURVEY NO. 2 AND SITUATED NEST OF I-35 AT AND NORTH OA
INTERSECTION OF RECTOR ROAD.
RECI ATIONS 6
Staff recommends that the City Council consider further study of the
proposed annexation.
SUMMARY:
. ~ r
In accordance with Article 3.03 of the Subdivislua and Land Pevelop-
ment Regulations, this property is being submitted for study for
' annexation. The property is within the extraterritorial jurisdiction
but A section will be annexed upon completion of I-35 N annexation S
r~ of a $00 foot strip. The
property is the site of a proposed batch
8 plant, If the property is annexed, it would be consW ent with our '
a policy to protect the City's interest In development. rr
BACKGROUND:
The property is removed by a considerable distance from an urbanized
' aces, Hater and sewer lines are not anticipated to be extended until
2000 by the City of Denton. 1-35 is being repaved by the State High-
Way Department. The major concerns are land use control, aesthetic
' quality, and relation to the community. The land
ue
~ conflict wit a would be
h i
the Denton Development Guide. n
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AAPECTED:
f
All departments involved in the dev:lopment process, the land owner, '
and proposed developer.
PISCAL IMPACT$
At this time no buildings would be provided City services but fire
r protection would be a concern, If a building is constructed prior
to annexation the coats involved would increase.
Yy ' f Reepec ly submit s :
J' Prepared Ayr L oy arre 1
f ^ City tsanagar
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
;a
App ve
Jeff Me
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
2392
;f
,t
oink ;r • r
Creek J • N
R d.)
I u
.41 c
,
3 g rrsi ~ l~
I - 0 F: G r Rd. '
A
00
M Io n1 R d c: ~ ~ sacs 3 ~ 6 3 x
1.;,
JJ
flu pound ~ .
anzar
0.7
i 4;hi,i d, +
rf j
"tZC •
r
f
.
hold, d*
,1 r 1 14 • ~ri K
• 1
y
DATE: 06/16/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 6~~~
i ~J
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager E
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ANNFXATION OF MINGO INDUSTRIAL TRACT j
SUBDIVISION DESCRIBED AS A 6.6 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE MORRKAU I
FOREST SURVEY NO. 417 AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MINGO ROAD AND I
NORTH COOPER CREEK ROAD (A-47).
RSCOMKENDATION: I
s
If instructed by Council to proceed with the annexation, the
Planning and Zoning Commission will be requested to make a
;r; recommendation. Staff recommends annexation.
I
A request for annexation has been submitted by the owner,
Donald R. Curtis. The purpose for annexation to to permit
development of the property and a zoning request and preliminary
plat have been submitted.
CKGRO 1M:'
The property is vacant at this time. Safety Kleen and the Green
Giant distribution center are located to the south and the Cooper
a Creek Baptist Church is located west. A sanitary sewer line is
located in North Cooper Creek Road.
` PROGRAW, DKPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
All departments involved in the development process and the land
owner.
FISCAL IMPACT:
City services would be extended to the property, if annexed, but
f
because of the location and existing facilities and no structures on
the property the impact should be minimal.
Respec ly submitted:
r
Lloy arre 1
Prepared by: City nager
E 4 f/it~
Cecile Carson
urban Planner
Appr ad,
Jeff Me e
Direotor of Planning
and Development
2389g.
4
1
J
o0
y' V A4'7L
~ 111
' PD-ie~ L
IF-1 P i _ c
A C
i - A
C
i
i PD-64 A C1.
y
C
1 '
PETITION
FOR
ANNEXATION
TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
t
AND
CITY jOVNCIL
I or
j THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
The undersigned doe hereby etit on for annexation of f~0 acres located
at in the extraterritorial jurisdiction
of the ty of Den on, Texas. The prop
ert is
more ee er lcu
la
rlY des
p cribed i
h
the attached survey description and shown on the attached map. The undersigned
also certifies that the following required information concerning the land and
its inhabitants is reasonably accurate and assumes responsibility for
completion of said information prior to scheduled action on the request by the
City of Denton.
1. Is petition being initiated 1u/owner(s) or majority of registered voters In
area of request? Yes No If no, what is the status
of the applicant?,
E 2. Now many dwelling unite are located within the area requested for
annexation? W etro
3. How many businesses or nonresidential land uses are located within the area
l of the request? 62!Q Please provide a general description of these
land uses including the name(s) of businesses, It known
f
4. Does area of request include any territory within the city limits or extra-
territorial jurisdiction of another city? Yee No W-1
S. Estimated population of the area of request. Adults I!
Childrea Number of registered voters?
6. At the time of this petition, have any other annexation procedures been
initiated for all or aryr part :,f the area requested in this petition?
Yes No It yea, please explain the procedures begun
and their statue.
Does a water supply district Ile within the boundaries of the area proposed
for annexation? Yes No
S. What zoning, if any, other then a ri ltu 1 ( Is being requested under
i separate palilion? Pit-'Cx
Now much of territoryy p~roposed for annexation le included In zoni
a petition? _ Oylf~`I1G ,4l 1
1
Petition for Annexation
Page Two
9. What i the purpose of annexation? O s/!o._, r-OCe", e
lo- Planned land use (!f zoning is being requested):
Proposed unit
Category b Total Per Acre And/or
~ ro Deed Acre ew Seuer:e pi oo`tiwe.
a- Single family detached
b. Single family attached (townhouses,
cluster, eto.) j
c. Attached patio/garden/zero lot line
d. Duplex
e. Kulti-family
C. Office
• ' w w6.
g. Neighborhood service too
h• General Retail
L. Commercial • At.
light industrial
k. Heavy rndustrial
Proposed use a
}i specific use permit or planned develo went
requested. / dL•✓IC P (PD) being
s
!1. Have ;
pottttoner(e) femlllarized themselves with the official annexation
{ policy, land use poltcieg, and the standard municipal service plan of the
City of Denton? Yes
7~ No
r; Name of Owner(s) DOS
w I Signature(s) Telephone ~9117TH &
Y+. Address(ee) Date
q
i` tf petitioner is not the ovner of the property; Statue
ti {A' Petitioner -
New
- -
signature(s) Telephone 1
Address(es) Date
i{
a Field Notes and Location Map for area
submitted along with completed petition befpsed for
oreoprocess beginsation must be
0362
H-
i
1
DATE: 06/16/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
;
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
PROMi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
S0JECT• DISCUSSION OF A ZONING REQUEST FOR 830.2 ACRES (LAKEVIEW) AND 425.4
ACRES (SOUTHVIEW)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommendation will be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning
1 Commission at a later date.
i
SUMMARY:
Miller of Texas, Inc. and Carter and Burgess, Inc. have prepared
a concept plan to amend the original section of Lakeview and to
add property which is in the annexation process. They have also
t „ submitted a concept plan to zone the southern section of property.
The land uses proposed range from light industrial to single
family-10. t
fah;+s,l BACKGROUNDt
in 1985 and 1986 the City processed a zcning request for 6004 acres A
in the Trinity Road-McKinney Street area. The City Council approved
s, the mixed use development in January 1987.
# PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS APFECTED.
4~^ 'f All departments involved in the development proceas, the land owner,
adjacent property owners and citizens of Denton. 'r
FISCAL IMPACTI
Extensive analysis was provided during the original zoning request °i
for the northern section. Costs and benefits would be seen from the ;
development of the property.
Reaper Sy su mite '
00
Lloy . Harrell
rQ
Prepared bys City Manager
r y Cecile Carson
^n`" it Urban planner
APPr d t ;
I
y r Jeff Mey o,b
Executive Director for
t-0 planning and Development
g390a
'n
I
i
' uao uw ~w.ru~r
wuwr
ti 3Y
- ..:.-•-a Vii- n. '
wit
M V
voul
I
fl
Y IIIy IYUl1y yy.,y ~
N - - i ~r , N• I
1;1.4 z
• •1
i
mA.
j- -
' V • VI. Jnn•• ~ LA" V1•WYW,♦t
. I.IY l1Yl•Aw YW.IM II__
Ya ~I~1" I
' pYr~lw n, r+~ ~.j'`) •I: rh. I•a ='r ~
~ r
e f r • .t-.i 1.
yy I
AK@VIEw ~'"a.•.
f AIAaM~O WVLLdMN~M wN1eN. Mud J7~..,~y I.t I,
.w~ r• p ~r
ryr r r•.J► ra .NrN . wwN. r•a
M•1r ~r• Y H~ywynY IM IYOIII. NIIN~
M, ••1•••Yll,~ A" Nr r~•iIwW/ wi•I•y}.IIY N•r
YM NL . III I/11N NN ,J
' i ~ I ff IY. L~111Yf i
MY
Fill who 8° CAEA w IN souAq~a F ~+~cn~ Mkt oro s-,M a
N Aaw
I Hrllh ia'hL IJJ y~ ,
II ~}►,f~l Il t M
LAND USE • Jrn.{ AA +A 9J41 AJp It N
SUMMARY to A-T~10 t.l
0
la IN}A a
4 ~tS.•tsoJ,.S a,JO
LAKEVIEW r44 y , Iw/ 4,qAV, , L t NA
• iae40 WA I. Is A NA
♦J;,eJ w,, t NA
• v,nc! t• NA 1,{w, aJO fJ,: 5 M I
7 vi•7 'LOueat 9,! NA 4,711.45t, t NA
i
• Jrr02 iA! kA }II, 65; 4J7, A NA 'i
• La•T INOUfJUAL H3 NA I
6N,19J H1, t
10 ~uVi-hHLY A t OJI NA IJr. Lt
11 CW V'la NJnk 4tl ♦i} M 4JY, 7 9,1 ' ii
1Q «NaJ 9W LhG li . N1 NA +67, t NA
Ne swexN„0
1a
IWV46 1J NA W,YM'v I)/, ( nA j
14. PA4C fj NA
1A NA
1! l~iYEa.NJrty 110 41 NA 41
1• 6C•JJL iJ9 NA NA NA t NA
17 PA04 tl0 NA 9A NA y0
1• 6J 51'4 V.HiLY•a h11 940 :A !2,. t NA
In 6Ns.! rAHiL1•~ t}.J 71 NA NA
C
no PAPA da NA NA NA
W tli
01 IJA ATTA4.10 1440 04- NA N% 2 I,r
~a> a wJ0
ktavct io NA l,4 vN 4Jr• t NA
0.7 5iN10,a FArmLf'S !a! lot NA ray t NA
404 «NlL2 MH Lr. ti. A 9I NA
i HNLTI•rANIryY !!.A ~C1 NA • r, 1, D r,!
4.x40 rAnlLf-IJ t~.k 4! NIA ?a Y, i NA (
•7 41'" M-w - i
f k1a.w iJ Y'A lJ9,J!! 41 r, i NA 4)
40,.10.9 ►Arnu-~ sJS 401 Nul. tar. ( NA
«NMI IA•IiLf•'i to 60 1" NA liar. L NA
r ,0 tow" PA'MiLY• T 1P 44
I M YA s4/. 'a NA f
,1 0w{ {R wJ l~ y v
u1 NA A0>, Z L} j
an
HnLAAL 129iL It r NA 4:11
1
NA
,m PAaA
" (0 4 NA NA NA NA
as
N , 34 1Nwat/ Ol-0W H.r tOt NA :27 t
f
f NA
0•
a:wO' . -111,i NA NA IVA
11
an HuLTi•/MJLT 14.0 W NA 401,
,7 i.f
viRC1 0o NA 544,Jiy *Ar.
` 1 - l aim Vol" 0A NA 410,ayl 4J1 f
` D NA
Sr MuLn•R..rNLr II,} 191 NA 4J,,' S
•F r•[v4 PA 1• i
40 11,110I NA Of, 0.110 w r, t NA
41 00101 16.1
NA e~~,s11 440/. e W
PI 0.04,
I ~ !lYJI l J wr t 1. 2 ~ _
Teede
tlIJ i l,sY! h,r0s, s7i 41.A
t
LAKEVIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT PLAN
6-9-87
1. Statement of intent of owner:
Lakeview Planned Development M)) is a proposed mixed use development w4enmmerr1n1
office, residential, light industrial and open space land uses. The development
concept is in response to: the physical relationship of the site to Lake Lewisyi]je;
compatibility and diversity of land uses; providing community housing, employment
and commercial activit ; balance of transportation system w1land uses: public safety
w /improved access and circulation; providing improved water 6 sanitary sewer systems;
and maintaining open space greenbelts as well as providing park 6 school facilities
2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guide: for the region. (over)
Lakeview Planned Development (PD) proposes a reduction in density from thg nrevinusly j
approved Lakeview PD. The intention of this project is A quality development for
E 2, Denton in accordance with the Denton Development Guide. _
R, •i ,
Gj 1. Total Number of Acres in Proposed District: ~
F L ~ 830,2 acres ~
f
4. Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tract:
Total Proposed Acreage
< ?":•i a. Single Family Detached 362.1
4 b. Single Family Attached (townhouses, cluster, etc.( 89.4
~i Co r-
Attached Patlo/Garden/tero Lot Line
d. Duplex -
a. Multi-Family 77.4
f, office 66.0
' g. Neighborhood Service 23.6
47.6
h. General Retail
'Commercial
j. Light industrial 39.3
k. Heavy industrial _
ti L Other (specify) School 6 Parks 49.7
~ a rh Major R.O.W. 5313
{ Collector R.O.W. ' s 3! j
Total 830.2 Ac, i
j
t
ievelopment Standards
Page 2
r I
/ S. off-Site Information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
(Shown on concept :rxxdnkdtkkasi plan.)
6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots, j
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept omad dsdcplan.)
f
i I
Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.)
Refer to previbus traffic study report (4-21-86) submitted with Lakeview PD
i
I
7. Buildings:
a. Approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
b. Maximum heights
_ Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
c. Minimum setbacks: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) "r
r'' • N. A .
y „ d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidential,:
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
,o 8. Residential subdivisions
a. Number of units per acre (density):
Shown in Summary on Conil:at Plan
b. Number and location of lotas (shown on concept or detailed plan.)
( N.A.
c. Minimum-size, width and depth of lots: (Shown on concept or detailed plan,)
N A
S _
d. Minimum front, side and tear yard setbacker (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
N.A.
r t
r f ~ w
.Y Yi
V
I
I
Jevelopment Standard.-
page 3
9- Water and Drainage - Proposed creeks,
alns, pproximnothetre lwaocaer
ttion of all existing or
ponds, lakes, floodpla j
retention or major drainage facilities
and improvements, (Shown on moamspg1li
j Plan.)
j 10- Utilities - location of all major sewer, water o: electrical lines and facilities.
i (Shown on concept RaxdRt&i(k0d plan-) 1 lie Location of trees 3' in diameter -
six (6) feet from ground levol. 1
(Pnoun on concept or detailed plan,) N, A.
12- Open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parks, common and recreational areas,
f
(Shown on concept RxxdttakYauY plan.)
r,
13e Screening -location t
ti ,pe and size of all fences berms or screening fea
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.) I
~k tures,
+ N.A.
N 14- Development Schedule (concept
f; be submitted plan) - showing specific date detailed
, date to start construction and com Iet plan will
construction, and rate of
development- All dates should indicate month and year,
year-
{ a c me t for Develo meat Schedule
e,
t e -ADDITIONAL REQUIREME
NTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN
1S, Landscaping plan - major features and types of landscaping
--.-~.A to u
sad.
J 33
I
I(
I 4s
r
~ 1
Development Standards
Page /
/ 16. Signs - show lccation, type
and
, iz r
eon detailed plane otherwise, sigma must
conform to Article 17 of the toning Ordinance. I
r
! r N.A.
'k a
17, Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.)
! N.A.
18. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A
(Denton Development code) of the code of Ordinancea,
(A separate plat is required,)
N.A.
19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
r ' construction and tke rate of development. All dates should indicate month
and year.
I
s
t ro n
4i 7 I 1
^ I 9
• , y r~, J '~I~ I
h
,r
1
4 III .
~ r lly{
r + .n . L S/A7
r ~ a1 .l^~. n
l { I
f
i
7
is
1
1
€ LAKEVIEW
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
SCHEDULE
t
Net 8 of Commencing Completion Completion
j Phase Acreage Tracts Project Date Date %
1 246.5 1-11, 18-22 32 Dee 1987 June 1990 32
2 132.6 12-14 17 Dec 1989 June 1992 49
3 121.3 15-16, 23-25, 53 16 Dee 1991 Dec 1994 65
4 212.5 17, 26-32, 34-37 27 Dec 1994 Dec 1996 92
5 42.2 38-41 8 June 1996 Dee 1998 100
7T5.1
+yji 4~'fit.
i 11 r 5
a 4
I ~ V J M1 F.'..
ar.
a ti
tr
1 bn'll i *i
r
c
,v. ut
1.. f
u t ..C
LL,
,
J
iii YS;' P1"'w
C&8 No. 8700800101
1 ti Y, f I
of
i
{.we w a+rw•uly ~,I 'tt.\ • I..yyy.•y.•
wvTVww 1 . L ~ ~
iY
• _ .rI
• .M I•
• - M II'•4~ Yylu
.
v •
r
IrJ 1 ~ 1 ~
17>
I •
.y _
'
t,
i
f, ( frh ' • 0.v
• ~ I ~ f = t ;1 re .
Sp.; I
'•I L.' WNMY'. ~w9 ZL y
5\ r,
rrA r I
X 5N,
1, a
' I _r
I t
i
.,.1,.`
60UTHVIISW
C.a.OK T..A.
~MVY• Y~YM•►{.W~l Ya.Y Y H4{. Y.. {urM
' _•l}~Mry4l{A/C {mow I l.r .iiY/ \I. VIA r{•.r• Y{ ~Ny y
_ M! rlivlY 1 11 -;Wpm"
MN ~•r ~ N'r~, •MI
YrM1 •{F Yd {N %•Nqr NIY
LAND USE SUMMARY
SOUTHVIEW
PROPOSED MAX, MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAX MINIMUM
KPARCEL LAND USE ACREAGE UNITS SQUARE FEET COVERAGE BLOO HEIGHT OPEN SPACE
IN ACRES
MJLT~•FAMILY t1, 4' 735 NA 4A1. 3 3.1
!;c1 ERAL Pt iA'L 6,9 NA 31 J, 141 .011 1 NSA
3 MULTI-GAMILY 13 r 42p5 qA
4 yrJyLEFAMILY-5 'il,~ X9'2 NA 35 2 NA
0 PAIaK 28. b NA IJA NA NA 28.3
S,NG,.f FAMILY-1 111,5 6+ NA 35 2 NA
7 5 N6LE FAM LY • 24, J5 NA ~;5% 2 NA
8 GENErvAI, WAIL I. e NA 2s4 344• SAY, 2 NA
I~5 NA f~% 2 NA
. 8 ~~19LE1~1M~1-5 c4k
10 E,wg~c~r:V !JA I1J4;~:¢~ 40 2 NA
?4 461
13
ai }E~ti%-~ , 'G ~
13 ~,EwcE b.4 NA 2c :,9c't GJ/, NA
I
14 eim-m. P,&~svrllio 1110 NA
~6ihCa+,l~0
I 16 hEbG6 3.1 NA i,hl~i AA%, 1 ~1A
of AT1A MEn i2. A 144- NA :6!', 2 112
{
NA
17 4;~N" FAt~ Vf-'? J+",o
MAIAIx p.d,W, G,7LLEofdR R.Q.W. Id,
t'dbala 425,4 2,~Qy I,~.!v,~3~ ~l.7Aa.
1 t
1
LAND USE SUMMARY
SOUTHVIEW
PROPOSED MAX. MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAX MINIMUM
BLDG. OPEN SPACE
PARCEL LAND USE ACREAGE UNITS SQUARE FEET COVERAOE HEIGHT IN ACRES
1 MUL?I-FAM LY :5;. 965 qA +04 3 16.1
@ c7faERAL ptfoklL 6.9 0A 34,, 41 4-01, NIA
3 MULfI-FFMILY 4;p 4405 NA 4U% 3 I,q
4 hiN fiwl~Y-5 'II. n X92 NA 35'G 2 NA
D pA~2K 26,15 NA NA NA r!A 240.3
9 - ~aiNlrLE FAMiLY•? i9,5 84 NA 35 2 PA
7 c-~hIbLE FAM'LY -9 24,3 io5 Nip NA
8 GENERAL gEtAIL 7 a NA 24041 344• 4v 2 NA
9 2~>LE FfMtir-5 rcrr lay NA ~5% 2 NA
i
' ~ n~is~BJ?~Ir)U
i 113 IJA Ior,F¢a- 4,; L NA
i
~ G.~J%"iK Nr•r?s 1,L.'C `L5? i\A 4V'% y.
0113 C8t'
zw k:: "P•L NA tie Gd3 L NA
nE
13 et vag o.4 NA 14A,, d4 -I NA
14 oiWy,,c- PAHiLY-w ?o.k 11 o NA 2 NA
0115 NA O.A
i
18 5F Af1AZHEG 12.9 144- NF ~.5r, 2 1.2
17 S+NKe FAw-? 4~.3 liS NA
MAJVR K.v.W. 24,.
GULLEafJR. p..v.W. Id,+~
tOtiwl~ 445. I 0 J
4- 2
,Z2q ,2dh ~Z7AG,
I
f
fi
SOUTIM EW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT PLAN
6-9-87
16 Statement of Intent of owner;
Southview Planned Development (PD) is a proposed mixed use development with commer-
cial, residential and open space land uses The development concept is in response I
_to: the physical relationship of the site to Lake Lewisville; compatibility and j
diversity of land uses; providing community housing employment and commercial
activity; balance of transportation system w/land uses-, public safety w/improved
access 6 circulation; providing improved water 6 sanitary sewer systems; and main-
taining open space greenbelts as well as providing park 5 school facilities for
2. statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guides the region, (over)
't. _Southview Planned Development fPD) prnpnsea - reduC inn in d neity from h
-previously approved Southview PD The intention is a ouaFity development for
Denton in accordance with the Denton Develo ment Guide.
3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed District:
425.5 acres
I
s x~
4, Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tracts
Total Proposed Acreage
as Single Family Detached 230.4 E
3 b, Single Family Attached (townhouses, cluster, etc.) 44.2
c, Attached Patio/Garden/2ero Lot Line j
d. Duplex _ j
Multi-Family
50.0
f. office
g. Neighborhood Service i- 12.6 E[
h. General Retail 25.0
i. Commercial
Light industrial
k, Heavy Industrial r
1. Other (specify) Park 2813
Major R.O.W. .19416 P 11 Collector R.O.W.
10.E
Total 425.4 Ac.
r
r
evelopment standards
Page 2
5. off-Site information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
(Shown an concept aaxdakakkact plan.(
i
6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan,)
Projected Traffic veneration, leased on traffic study, if required.)
` Refer to vrevibus traffic study revort (4-21-86) submitted with Lakeview PD
1 y. Buildings:
I a, Approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
,i
J
b, maximum heights
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
c, Minimum setbacks: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
N.A.
- i
d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidential:
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
S, Residential SubdivisLon:
as Number of unite per acre (densityls
"s Shown in Summary on--Concept Plan -
b. Number and location of lots: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
01 1
N A
c. Minimum-size, width and depth of lots (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
N.A. _
d. Minimum front, side and rear yard setbackss (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
y N.A.
ry.~ E
r:
r
aevelopment Standards
Page 3
I 9. Water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or major drainage facilities
and improvements. (Shown on "nog4MAM
ut lit;; .71`1*a plan. )
10, utilities - location of all major seu,:r, water or electrical lines and facilitie..
(Shown on concept =xdaea*M* plan.)
i
11. Location of trees 3' in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.) N.A. w`
12. Open Space - location and site of greenbelts, parks, common and recreational areas.
:f (Shown on concept =)daVsI plan.)
13. Screening - location, type and size of all fences, berms or screening features,
1
j (Shown on concept or detailed plan,)
14, Development Schedule (concept plan) - ahiring specific date detailed plan will
i a be submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of
i development. All dates should indicate month and year,
.9 go atta hmen for Devellooment S he edu,'.o
rl ;
p`
ADDITIONAL REQUIREKENTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN
15, Landscaping Plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used.
N. A,
y
f.
,
Development Standards
Page 4
16. Signs - show location, type and size on detailed plank otherwise, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the Zoning Ordinance.
N.A.
17. Sidewalks, (Shown on detailed plan.) N,A, k :z=
16, All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A
(Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances.
(A separate plat is required.) N.A.
14. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month "
i and year,
{ N.A.
f ~ ' 11,~ II , l1
t 1 t,14
Yoe Y', ~.1.C
N _ IC {r
f m
~1 7
M
i '
Y ~ J
s 1 y .1 J•f:
lay '
eD
I ~ 1/87
1
J
T 'M e
Y,
SOUTHVIEW
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
SCHEDULE
Net 8
Phase of
A Commencing Completton Comrletlon
creatte Tracts Pro eet D_ at`~
D----ate
1 94.9 14-17
24 Dec 1987 June 1991 24
2 79.2 7. 8, 11-13 20 Dec 1990 Dec 1992 48
3 86.2 5. 9, 10 22 Dec 1992 Dec 1994
4 130.2
67
1-4 34 June 1994 Dec 1997
0
100
390.5 s
5
'I pY ,
Fy F '~~I
J? 6 r IR, IN e'
tt;l~r
h C!B No. 8700800101
l
lei 1 rf aV~, '
M l j'~ 3-r~ F .J
j IJ
I ~~f.
L
City O/ D&NTON, rExA! MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 213 E. MCKINNEYST. / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
July y, 1980
x-1,7
Mr. Lew Anderton
Miller of Texas, Inc.
First City Bank 'rower
201 Main Street, Suite 2420
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Dear ,Mr. Anderton;
At our meeting of June 27, 1986, you presented a land use plan for the
approximately 1,060 acre zoning proposal east of the City of Denton
be }weep U.S. Highway 38U and Paige Road, The Planning and Development
Department expressed concerns with the plan especially in regard to
violations of the Denton Uevelbpwent Guide policies The attachment
to this letter addresses the policy questions and violations and also
includes suggestions by the staff to eliminate the policy violations. "
The staff has two additional items that need to be addressed. One
item concerns the possibility
of the
submittal analysis rlith this request. If you are planninoftonsubmit man analysis
as part of this request, the City of Denton wilf nire an economist to
analyze the economic Impact to the City. The fee for the economist
will be charged to the petitioner. The other item concerns th4 fee
required for a planned development. The fees paid by Miller of Texas,
Inc. for the 66 acre and 200 acre tracts (2.1800 and x-1801) are still
! valid if those separate requests are continued; however, the fee for
the first request, 2.1779, is no longer applicable since action has
been completed except for the adoption of the ordinance. Therefore
a fee would be required for this request. The fee for a pplanned
development is $1,000 plus $SO per acre to a maximum of $ b,000,
I look forward to working with you to insure that this proposal is
completed with as little confusion as possible, if I can assist you
In any way please contact me.
Sincerely,
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
ab
Attachment .
ccs Metroplex Engineering
1123 Port Worth Drive
Denton, Texas Btf/666E7pD
D/fW METRO 434•230
Ai'K 1 3 987
ME?,10 87-021 . '1
DATE: 9 April, 1987
5
TO: Mr. R. Svehla, Deputy City Manager
i la, Deputy CEty Manager
j FROM: J. L. Cook, Jr., Fire Chief
RE. New Fire Station No. S
f
As you know, $450,000.00 was allocated for the construction of a new fire station
from a prior C!P package. These bonds have all ready been s)ld. In addition,
$700,000.00 in bonds are to be sold In FY 1988 for Station Six and an engine.
One station Is to be located near Lillian Miller at Teasley and ;he other at Bonnie
Brae and Windsor in Northlakes Park.
The need for both these stations have been well documented in the past. Ide
ally,
both should be built at the same time using the some plans, architect, and con-
tractor in order to save money. Quite frankly, the monies allocated for these sto-
' tions afford us a tight budget. Unfortunately, both stations can not be built now
because the downturn in the economy prevents us from hiring the personnel to
a, open both stations, E
This is unfortunate, because the current economic slump presents us with an op-
portunity to stretch our dollars because of the buyers market In the construction
industry. Rather than let this opportunity pass, I would like for you to consider
" an alternative that would allow us to open at least one station and begin to plan
for the second,
Before Inflation begins anew, we should build one fire station with the existing
$450,000.00. The best of the two locations would be at Northlakes. Why? Be-
cause the City owns the land and utilities are available. This allows us to build
more for less.
Personnel costs would be minimal because we can relocate one of the two aniline
companies now housed at Station One, We need only promote an additional Captaln.
Three new Captain slots would cost us less than the salary of one additional fire
fighter.
The announcement by TI to build near Northlakes will no doubt act as a catalyst
to new development In the area as well
the extension
we should time the construction of this new facility to coincide8with Tile opening,
Even if we started today by hiring an architect, the planning process, bidding
procedures and actual construction would not allow us to open the station for '
12-15 months, The opening date would more than likely be sometime well into
FY 1988. By that time, funds would be available for Staticn 6. One possibility
that exists 16 to build both stations using the same plans, architect, and contractor
with construction of Station Six beginning upon completion of Station Five. Ob-
}
viously Station Six would not open until FY 1989. Therefore, with any luck the
economy should have expanded to allow us to hire the additional personnel neces-
sary to operate the station.
I am sure that it is politically a sensitive Issue to build In Northlakes first, but we
do not have the land in the southeast sector. However, by starting construction
of a station using the existing funds we would show the community that we are
committed to completing projects that they have approved and we will begin to pro-
vide better fire protection for the whole community.
A fInal point to consider Is the results of the PTI Fire Master Run that was used f
for the 1986 CIP. A copy of that run is attached. Please note that Option C
considered only the Northlakes Station and Option B only the Lillian Miller Station.
Of the two options considered, the Northlakes Station had a slight edge over just
the Lillian Miller Station.
Thank you for your consideration In this matter. Should you desire further infor-
mation, please do not hesitate to contact me.
d
~ 4• j
{
. wig u
v
ka
I k,
~ 4 ,al
K.
{
I M f r ~1~4
I
f ,
71 I . 4'
jf
I ' t
4 i
w
d
l
t
A B C t) E All numbers are no, of demand tones of
that type In which Initial response times*
ALL 'A cannot be met.
FD2 1S0 99 78 75 68 65
~y Where 2 no.'s appear, - 1st is no. of d13-
mand tones that cannot be reached In the
LOW 60 37 28/23 32128 29125 24118 established time rt~ame. 2nd no. Is no, of
demand :ones that cannot be reached In
110% of the establisFieTtime frame.
MED 23 14 14110 1319 1117 13/9
HIGH 7 S 514 412 313 412
INbl1St 9 8 818 717 818 717
COMM 19 11 1119 10/7 918` 10/7
UNIV .
CAMPUS 6 1 110 110 312 110
UND 26 14 1119 613 512 613
A present Stations 1, 20 3, 6 4 Station Locations
8 *','present Stations 1, 28 30 4, plus new Station 5 11 - 217 West McKinney
C, preseNt Stations to 2, 3, 40 plus new StaUon 6 12 - 3309 East McKinney
O present Stations 1, 2, 0. 'plus new Stations 7 6 8 13 - Ave. A @ McCormick
f1 present Stations 1, 20 3, 4, plus new Stations 5 s 6 14 - Sherman @ Kings Row
15 - Lillian Miller @ Teashy
' 16 - Windsor @ Bonnie Grae
117 Mesa @ US 380
18 - Teasley @ Savannah
+r•r•.rfa~ ."`:~►4ai~~lMWlriv4«~.h
. . irxa'.w..N.F:dtWw.WYWira.w+wMw«.,ww++W..n✓+flw.~+a....~._~
1
'Fyy
Yr
1 '
7'00
City of Denton City Council Minutes/
June 2, 1987
The Council convened into the work Session at 5:30 p.m, in the
Civil Leferse Boom.
PRELNT1 Mayor St•phensr Mayor Pro Tem hCAaamsr Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and Hopkins.
ABSENT: None
1. The Council received an update on the radio system.
Rick Svehla, Deputy city Manage„ stated that at the 4re6ent
time 74 radios had been committed to the aystem. Some of the
bigger entities, such as the County and the School District,
had not yet committed to the system. The State School had made
a verbal commitment fcr approximately 30-I0 radios. in 1987-88
there would be a payment on the interest for the bonds. This
needed to be done so that the bonds would sell at a good rate.
,1+a No conversion would be done in the early years as was once
thought and more interest needed to be generated by the various
entities. There would be no problem with the city n6t issuing
the bonds on the 16th of June it there were not I" k enough
radios
committed by them.
Lloyd HarrelI$ City manager, stated that it the County did not
go on the system, there were alternative funding packages that
could be looked into to that ant City did not loons this
Ft opportunity.
It was the consensus of the Council to continue as planned.
2.
The Council convened into Executive Session to discuss
imp r legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments.
r 'i; More scecifically, board Ind commissicn appointments. No
official action was taken.
The Council then convened into the regular meeting at 1100 p.m.
' in the Council Chambers.
r1~ , 1.
it r PRESEh. Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Ism McAdams; council i I,
i Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and Hopkins.
A914NTr None
7 ~ 1
i. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the +
special call meeting of May 1s 1987, the regular meeting of
may 5, 19r-7 and May 12, 1987.
Council Member Hopkins pointed out two typographical orrors in
$ 9~' I the May 5th minutes and asked the City Secretary to change such.
k
McAdams notion, Ayer second to approve the minutes with the
s
f~ $oa corrections as stated. Motion carried unanimo'lsly, 20 The Council received presentations of beautification
lL+`~~ ' 2. The Council received presentations of beautification
awards to Mc. Ellis Thomas, Mt, and Mrs. John Brooks, Dr.
Millie Johnsons and the Center for the Visual Arts,
Mr, Bob Ticknor, r'uperintendent of Parks, stated that f
Ellis Thomas and Mr. and Mrs. John Brooks had received the
awards in the residential category. Dr. Millie Johnson and the
3 ^ Center for the Via ual Arts had sec
e1v.1 the awards in the
commercial category, Mary Les Kendrick@ accepted the award for
r al the Center for the Visual Arts.
Item B.A. was moved ahead in the agenda order,
c y,.
r
}
y
City of Denton city council Minutes
June 2, 1981
Page 2
6. Resolutions
A. The council conalderea approval of a resolution
in appreciation of Milton "Shep" Scogin.
The following resolution was presented by Mayor Stephens!
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
A RESOLUTION IN APPREr,IATIDt! OF MILT014 "SHEP" SCOGIN
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Gorton second to approve the resolution. On !
roll vote, MCAdIma "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Stephens Congratulated Mr. Scogin for 411 the years of
:.urk he had done in the reserve service.
i
0. The Council consleerea approval of a resolution
temporarily closing the 100 block of North Elm, best Oak, North
Locust and hest Hickory iThe Square) from 6.00 a.m. until 12
midnight on September 19, 1967 for County Seat Saturday,
t The following resolution was consideredi
f•,' RESOLUTION NO. 967-016
. ,
A RES S,UTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING THE ILO BLOCK OF
E`A r j NORTH ELM STREET, 100 BLOCK OF %EST OAK STREET, 100 r
BLOCK OF NORTH LOCUST STREET AND IOU BLGCK (,F hES'T
HICKORY STREET ON SEPTEMBER li, 1987) AND DECLARING AN 'i
EFFECTIVE DATE.
~i 11
Geneva Berg, Central Business District, stated that the
celebration last year was such a success that it way requested
N7, again this year. The theme this year woulo be, "In the spirit
1 and tradition of the past".
' Ayer motion, McAdams second to a
pprove the [eaoluticn, On roll
vote, McAdams "ayeAlexanuer "ayeMop)kino 'aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "eye," 8oy8 "aye," and hay,u. Stephens "aye." {
Motion carriv4 unanimously.
' C. The Council considered approval of a resolution
temporarily closing Pembroo,te and Lynhurst Streets at the
e intersection of Pennsylvania and Longridge on June 20, 1487
from the hours of 2100 p.m. until 11710 p.m. for the purpose of
w having a neighborhood block party.
The following resolution was considereat
RESOLUTION NO. 987-077
v~ty' A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING PEMBROOKE AND
LYNHURST ST'PEETb ON JUNE 20, 19871 AND DECLARING AN
* EFFECTIVE DATE.
a 4 lane Lemon stated that the block party was so oucceastul last
` year that all the area residents wanted to hold it again this
i year,
Ayer motion, McAdams second to approve the resolution. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Cotton "spaAyer "ayssold "aye," and mayor Stephens ;
"aye." Motion carried Unanlmogoy.
7 The Coun.il returned to the regllar agenda order.
Y
4
)1
a
7
r
City of Denton city council minutes
June 2, 1987
Page 3
3. Public Hearings
A. The Council consicered approval of a petition of
Metroplex Engineering Corporation, representing Country Club
Place Joint Venture, requ!sting the amendment of a planned
development and approval of a detailed plan. The property was
located at the southeast corner of FM 1630 and Hobson Lane and
was approximately 6.505 acres located in the T. Martin Survey,
Abstract 900. If approved, the detailed plan could permit the
development of zero loo line houses on 5,000 square toot lots.
(x-1844)
The Aayor opened the public hearing.
Greg Edwards, Yetroplex Engineering, stated that this was a
revised detailed site plan. The previous request had been for
duplexes, four-plex:s and multi-family type usage. A more
unified community development was being presented. Attached
single family lots were being suggested in order to make the
i area appear mare unified. The density would be reduced in the
area and a pool and tennis court would be added.
i
c No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Urban Planner, stated that 5 reply forma had
been mailed with I returned in favor and 0 in opposition. The
petition requested a change from attached and Get cted
townhomes/patio homes to attached housing. Both the density
and intensity would to reduced and the overall design would be
imrroved. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 in
ti tavor of the petition.
The following ordinance was coneldered:
~ . , NO. 87-096 ~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING
ThE PLANN60 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CREATED BY ORDINANCE
.1 I 65-256, AS AMENDED, TO PROVIDE ?OR THE APPROVAL OF A
DETAILED PLAN FOR A PORTION OF IhE DISTRICT; SAID PLAN
CONSISTING OF F.5 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHEAST I
CORVER OF TES ERSE,;TION OF FM 1830 AND HOBSOII LAME;
I PROVIDINU A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
$1000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THERECE1 AND PROVIDING FOR AN
t iY EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. Oq roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
1 B. The Council held a
public hearing concerning the
proposed annexation of 212.12 acres being a part of the 1. Coy
Survey, Abstract No. 212, J. Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 21 S.
Burleson Survey, Abstract No. 651 N. Coker Survey, Abstract No.
' 249; and the R. Johnson Survey, Abstract No. 666. (A-46)
i
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
' Cecile Carsons, Urban Planner, stated that this was s petition
of the City of Denton. It would be a $00' strip along the 135
corridor. This was a reduction from a previous annexation of
700'. This annexation vould allow for control of current land
use and future land use. The city could also expand to the
east and west with this annexation. 32 reply forms were mailed
with 0 returnei in favor and 5 returned in opposition.
,
,
`ry
a''i
City of Denton city Council Minutes
June 2, 1987
Page 4
Lisa xatz, Denton Joint Venture, spoke in favor stating that
the 500' strip was fine with her and her associates. No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Consensus of the council was to continue with
.
proc e a s the annexation
4• Consent Agenda
Alexander motion, Hopkins second to approve the Consent Agenda
as presented, Motion carried unanimously,
, Consent Agenda
A.
Bids and Purchase Orders
1• Bid 19742 - Tires ar.d Service
2• Bid 19747 - Chemicals - Seater Treatment
3. Bid #9745 Texas Instruments Eater and
' Sewer - Pert III {'21Cy)
4• P.O. #78766
a $12,783.53 - repattsilitf Equipment Company
y
di 8• Plats and Replete
a
1 nsider approval of preliminary plat of the
Country Club Place Addition, Lots 3 through
r " ,a 36, Block A. w x-
,t
2• Consider approval of preliminary and final
: t r replet of the Fokhunt Addition, Part of Lots
V 8 and 27.
%
4yK 3• Co
i9lOtt nsider approval at Preliminary plat of the
ar r ;t ' Lot
Final Payments 1, Block 1.
k7{ " ys 1• Consider a
t Stuart/Pe[ahinoval of a final payment on
Order #3 9 Outfall protect, Change
i
' S.
Ordinances
acne tin9
P A competitive cbida o s d ered adoption of an ordinance
` contracts for the purchase of rnateilaladlequipment~h auawatd of
services. pplies or
The fJllowing ordinance was cr+na'.deredt
NO. 87.097
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
4 CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF
ATERIALSp
# MEQUI,
OR SERVICES, PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURENOP
i h FUNDS THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
E
.s
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
June 2, 1987
Page 5
McAdams motiono Ayer second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
B. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works ur improvements.
The following ordinance was considered: {
NO, 87-098
I
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING
FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR
IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
bj~
`.1 THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
t McAdams motion, 9opkins second to adopt the ordinance.' On roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "Aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
a" Motion carried Unanimously. 1
' C. The Council considered rdoption of an ordinance
providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance
y, with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from
requirements of competitive bids.
The following ordinance was considered:
n~ y t !
` NO. 87-099
fififi AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MAIEHIALS, EQUIPMENT, jj
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE OITH THE PROVISIONS
OF ?:ATE LAW £xEMPIINO S7CH PURCHASES FROM
REOUIREk'.NTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS} AND PROVIDING FOR AN
" EFFECTIVE DATE.
p y3 Hopkins motion, McAdams motion to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "eye," Cotton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
D. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending Ordinance No. 87-013 designating and establishing
I speed zones for east and vest bound traffic on U.S. Highway 360
f,,om its intersection with interstate highway 35 to western ;
city limits for a distance of 2.592 miles.
The following ordinance was considered:
{ No. 87-100
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING SPEED ZONES h',a
FOR EAST AND WEST BOUND TRAFFIC ON U.S. HIGHWAY 380
FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35 TO
WESTERN CITY LIMITS FOR A DISTANCE OF 2.592 MILES;
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 83-03; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY
OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS (5200.00);
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECL RING AN !
EFFECTIVE DATE.
j ~fl
Lloyd Harrell, City manager, stated that the area was near the
Selwyn School.
i
Council Member Boyd asked if this area was eligible for the new
65 mile per hour speed limit.
j
r'
City of Denton City
June 2, 1967 council Minutes
Page 6
fllick 5vehor Deputy City Manage[, replied that the area vas not
eigible for the new speed limit because it vas a state highway
and the new speed limit applied only to the interstate highways,
Alexander motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On
Orton roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "eye," Hopkins "aye,"
"aye" Motion carried"unanfmoaaoyd
ly. "aye"" and kayo[ Stephens
E. The Council considered adoption of ordinance and
alrvice plan instituting annexation of 69,1691 scree being pact
0f the S. Venter Survey, Atatrtct No. 1315[ C. Chacon Survey,
Abatraet No. 296r J. Baker Surle!, Abs
t ~
ra
Sur Ve ct No, 1•
y, Abstract No s J. Dicke
312 on
r and the
I No A. Can
. 2 n on
32 Su
r and 1 [ve Abstract
ocateA adjacent Yr and 80
ut
Old Alton Read h of Ph 2161 an
i IA-I81 and
east of ~ .
The following ordinance was conslaerea:
i
` { No. AN ORDINANCE ANN'E%iNG A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS A:9
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS; ' , LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF r ANBEING ALL THAT
a - APPROXIMATELY 69.1694 ACRES OF LAND CONSISTING OF ~
- SITUATED IN THE COUNTY CF DENTON LYING AND BEING
BEING PART OF T'HE S.
VENTER r STATE OF XA5 AND
C. CHACON SURYEY, ABSTRACT NO. 298, ABSTRACT TEXAS
NO. 1;15,
' ABSTRACT NO. 17 298, J. SAXER SURVEY,
r J. DICKSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 140, 312,
AND THE A. CANNON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 232, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXASt CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTLRAL
'I "A" DISTRIc'f PRDPERat ALD DECLARING AN EMOTIVE DATE.
h
Vote, cAda.ms motion, Ayer second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
"aye," PAAerm ""aye aeAlexander ""aye,* Hopkins "aye," Carton
hrl", t Motion cairled unanim usyly, aye" end Mayor Stephens "aye."
r` A k F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance {
1. and service plan annexing approximately 60.82 acres being part
of the James Coltart Survey, Abstract No. 286, and located
,r` sr northweat of Loop 288" north of Kings
^w
ROAd, Aow, and vest of Farris
<< The following ordinance was conOlde[rd:
it 1 NO. 87
All ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
LOT, TRACT r BEING ALL THAT
CR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF
t APPROXIMATELY 80.82 A.AES OF LAND LYING AND BEING
SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON
i BEING PART OP r STATE OF 7E% AND
+ jd 2681 DENTON COOTHE JAMES
TECOLT ART SURYEY, ABSTRACT CT N
fjy AGRICULTURAL r TEXAS[ CLASSIFYING THE SANE A
AS
EPFECTIVE DATE,i" DISTRICT PROPERTY) AND DE DEC CLARING AN
4f ,a Cecile Ca[aons, Urban Planner, stated that this was the Einal
x action on a proposed annexation north of Loop 268, edjacent to
a development by Teasley Road Associates. The aajacent i
{ property vas toned and annier.ed last year. A proposed single
3 family developed was planned if annexation was completed.
y 1[
I
i
,e
City of Denton City Council Minutes
June 2, 1981
Page 7
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carries unanimously.
G. The Council considered approval of an ordinance
`I establishing coat for street lighting services pursuant to
section 25-21 of Chapter 25 of the code of n dinances ano
repealing ordinances in conflict therewith.
The following ordinance was considered:
N0. 87-102
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COST FOR STREET LIGHTING
SERVICES PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-21 OF CHAPTER 25 OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES] REPEALING ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
;j Bob Nelson, Executive Dlrectcr of Utilities, stated that once a
{ year the ordinance was looked at for actuz' cost for providing
the street light fixtures. This was an annual cost adjustment.
r k. McAdams motion, Boyd second is adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Carton
rf "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
N ;5?; Motion carried unanimously.
r
r ; H. The Council considered approval of an ordinance
w ,t 9 approving a contract for the City's participation in the cost
of installing an oversized water aainr authorizing the Mayor to
IN, y{ I 'i execute the contrack.r and approving the expenditure of tunas.
The following ordinance was considered:
r NO. 87-101
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
aya PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF INSTALLING AN OVERSIZED J4
WATER MAIN: AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
CONTRACT: APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE of FUNDS
THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.'
Bob Nelson, Executive Director of utilities, stated that this
9M was a water line being installed by Texas Instruments to
service their new facility. The Public Utilities board
recommended approval.
! 1i Alexander motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On
c roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and mayor Stephens
"F "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
1. The Council considered approval of an ordinance
f approving a contract for the City's participation in the cost
of installing an oversized sewer main] authorizing the Mayor to
execute the contract: and approving the expenditure of funds.
The following ordinance was considered:
r
NO. 87-104
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE COST Of INSTALLING AN OVERSIZED
SEWER MAIN: AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
CONTRACTI APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE Of FUNDS
THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
r
City of Denton city council Minutes
June 2, 1987
Page 8
Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, stated that this
item was alto for the new Texas Instruments facility. The
Public Utilities board recommended approval.
Debra Drayovltch, City Attorney, stated that several original
contracts had been brought to the City by the officials of
Texas Instruments. The developer had proposed to delete
language on page 2 of the contract but Drayovltch recommended
that the Council pass the contract that had not been amended.
Greg Edwards, Metroplex Engineering, stated that he thought the
problem was with giving title to an easement which Texas
Instruments had no part of.
Drayovltch suggested postponing a vote on this item :ntil the
next meeting.
Council Member Alexander suggested approving the original
document and if that was not agreeable with the developer, then
he could refuse the agreement and an adjustment could be made
next week.
McAdams motion, Aye.' second to adopt the ordinance as
originally prepared Ly the City of Denton. Gn roll vote,
McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye,"
Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
6. Hesolutions
Items A., B., and C. were acted on earlier In the meeting. ,r
N ^ r
uti alf D. The Council consideree approval of a resolution I
by the City of Lenton, Texas, authorizing the city Manager to
sign and submit to the Department of housing and Urban
Development a final statement of objectives and projected use
of funds with appropriate certifications, as authorized and
required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1971,
as amended.
I The following resolution was considered:
RESOLUTION NO, 987-038
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND !
+ URBAN DEVELOPMENT A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED
USE OF FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND
REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974,`
i
AS AMENDED.
Barbara Rose, Community Development Block Grant, stated that
the application would approve approximately
$578,000 worth of
funding for the next fiscal year. The CDBG Committee
recommended that the funds be spent as followed: $300,000 for
housing rehabilitation, $30,000 for demolition of substandard
structures, $102,000 for the Phoenix Apartments, $960 for a
°j smoke detector program, $25,000 for a small business incubator
study and $113,000 for administration of the program.
Mayor Pro Tem McAdams asked why federal funds were being spent
on another federal program. She wondered if other avenues had
been sought for the renovation of the Phoenix Apartments.
Mayor Stephena stated that the recommendation had come from the
citizens committee and not from the federal government.
i
L
City of Denton city council minutes
June 2, 1987
Page 9
1
Ross stated that there had been quite a lot of citizen input at !
the public hearing and that many individuals had requested
funding for the Phoenix Apartments.
McAdams was concerned if there were not other tunas to renovate `
the Apartments without having to always use funds that could go
to other projects.
Joe Gordon, Director of the Housing Authority, replied that
there were no other funds available for the Phoenix Apartments.
Boyd motion, McAdams second to approve the resolution. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye,' Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye,"
1 Motion carried uianimously.
7, Miscellaneous matters from the city Manager
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items:
!
A. COG was hosting its annual meeting on June 12th.
,f Council members needed to decide if they wanted to attend.
J B. Harrell presented a potential revenue raising
issue - expanding the sales tax to cover telecommunications.
` This needed to be done before June 30.
r 8. There was no official action taken on Executive
Session items of legal matters, real estate
, personnel nr board
appointments.
9, New Business
The following Items of new business were suggested by Council
Members:
A. Council Member Ayer requested staff to provide
q !ti information to the Council concerning rights, responsicilitles,
w f : options of the City in regard to utility districts. +
Specifica!ly, what could the City Council do to maze sure
people istrict w had been purchased voted are made aware ofathat facts a utility
i d
i + B. Council member Boyd suggested that as part of the
maintenance of vacant lots, the program include fire ant
control.
10. The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to
discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board E
appointments. More specifically to hold a discussion regarding
Board aken: and Commission appointments. The following action was 1.
a t
j
A. The Council appointed Mr. Murray Ricks to the
Board of Adjustment.
x
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
a r
i ' RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF PENION, TEXAS
i
JENNIFER "ALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
2391g
j
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
June 9, 1987
The council convened into the Special Call Meeting at 5:00 p.m.
in the Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephenar Mayor Pro Tem MCAdamsr Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd and Gorton.
ABSENT: Council Member Hopkins
1. The Council received a report regarding the request of
Grace Temple Baptist Church for a quitclaim and abandonment of
Gregg Street between Ponder and Fulton Streets.
Llold Harrell, City Manager, stated that the formal process for
this request would be taken up at the next Council meeting.
Tais Ciscussion would be for information purposes only.
David Ellison, Assistant to the City Manager, presented the
report to the Council. He stated Grace Temple Baptist Church
was requesting a quitclaim and abandonment of Gregg Street
between Ponder and Fulton Streets. The Church was interested
in expansion in that area for an educational building and
additional parking. In 1980 the sanctuary was built with a
variance for parking spaces granted by the Board of
Adyeatment. The Church was granted 6 years to obtair. all the
required parking spaces and to date it was not in compliance.
The Church had made several requests to the Development Review
Committee asking for the abandonment of Gregg Street. Reasons
cited for the proposed abandonment were for the safety of the
people who use the church and who mad to cross trattic in order
to get to the church. Of primary consideration were the
children who attended the daycare at the church and who had to
cross the street. The Engineering/Traffic Departments had
determined that 50% of the traffic using the street was
y attrib,ited to church usage. A concern with the closing of
6cegg Street was that Gregg was important to those people who
use the street and would affect their quality of life. On
April b, 1967 the request went to the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Planning and Zoning referred the request to the
Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission for analysis. The
Commission voted 4-1 to abandon the street. April 22, 190, '
the Planning and Zoning Commission again reviewed the request
and with a rote of 4-3 recommended not to abandon the street.
An alternative suggestion was to construct a new street north
of the boundary of the church property to replace Gregg
Street. This alternative was not favcrably received by the
church due to financial constraints,
c ~
After a lengthly discussion, it was the consensus of the
Council to hold a public hearing June 16, 1987 for the purpose
of receiving comments regarding a proposed closing of Gregg
Street. Formal action would be considered at the June 16, 1967 111
meeting.
2. The Council received a status report regarding the
" radio system.
r
LLoyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the current radio
system was outdated and that a great deal of money would have
to be spent on updating the system if the proposed radio system
were not Implemented. He stated that the funding package would
include the skeleton unit plus installing Utilities, the Police
and Fire Departments on the system. There would be no
financial obligation for the 1967-86 budget year and no
out-of-pocket coats during the first year. Although the County
had not formally committed to the system as of date, staff was
very optimistic that they soon would. A negative note
regarding the funding was that it would take lnnger to get City ±
units on t..e system but fire and police needed to be first. It
was the recommendation of the staff to continue with the
proposed ssle of Certificates of Obligation as scheduled for
June 16, 1987.
1
City of centon city council Minutes
June 9, 1997
Page 2
I
Item 6:00 P.M. 01. was moved ahead in the agenaa order.
1. The Council held a discussion with Dr. Shirley Chater
and Mr. Richard White regarding short-range and long-range
plans for Texas Woman's University.
President Chater gave a brief overview of the University. The
current student enrollment was approximately b,000 students
with an estimate of 10,000 students +ithin the next 5-10 years,
201 of the students were in the 18-24 age category, 2010 in the
over 40 age category and 601, in the 30 age categoryt 201 of
the atudents were single motherat 20-25% were minority
students; 661 of the faculty were women; 771 of all the
administration were women. Chater presented the following
ideas/suggestions of how the administration would liks to see
the University develop: 11) A Vice-President of Academic
Affairs had just been hired and a vice-President of
Institutional Advancement would soon be hired. These two
positions would hopefully contribute suggestions for a more
systematic fund raising campaign and a systematic image
campaign; 121 In September an academic planning process would
be initiated to look at various programs and how to support
positive programs, how to boost negative programs and posribly
cut other encouraged between m ThU land more cross-registration 1efaculty ioshaing 0also
encouraged. Currently the two Universities were sharing motor
n pools, coordinating library hours and parking spaces for the
library users, and MTSU had contracted for storage space while
some of their offices were being remodeled. Projects under
consideration Included the remodeling and expansion of the
animal care center, remodeling of the maryo Jones Auditorium
and the demolishing of the old gym and the Journalism buildings.
The Council, Dr. Chater and mr. White continueo wit,, a group
1 discussion dealing with such issues as cable T.V. ch.nnels,
public transportation, off-sl set parking, sidewalks at the
r University, participation in a Governor's handicapped
L 00mmittee, use of TWU'S facilities and areas of cooperation to
promote the best Iaterests of the City and of TW'U. 4
1 The Council returned to the regular agenda order.
3. The council held a discussion concerning the
telecommunication sales tax.
t'" JJ Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the tax would include
such items As intrastate long distance calls, call waiting, a
call forwarding, coin operated calls not serviced by a phone
company, and monile telephones. Basic local exchange service
would not be included in the tax.
j{( Council Member Boyd asked how much the anticipated revenue
would be.
i
John MCGrane, Executive Director of Finance, stated that
approximately ;50,000 of additional revenue was anticipated.
' Mayor Pro Tem McAdams stated that ohe was concerned with
placing an additional tax on people at this time when the City
s ' and County would be trying to pass the Flow Hospital District.
i 1
Mayor Stephens asked for a time sequence on the proposed tax.
~
i•T
h ,
,
City of Denton city council minutes
June 9, 1987
Page 3
McGrane replied that the ordinance had to be passed by June 30
as there would be a quarter lag time for the tax to be
implemented.
4. The council considered approval of an ordinance
j approving a contract for the City's participation in the cost
of installing an oversized sewer mains authorizing the Mayor to
{ execute the contracts and approving the expenditure of funds.
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, informed Council that this
ordinance was repealing the ordinance passed at the last
meeting due to Texas Instruments not being comfortable with the
3 language in the previous ordinance. k
1 i
i The following ordinance was considered:
"j ORDINANCE NO, 07-105
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
~ PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF IN6TALLING AN OVERSIZED
SEWER MAIN: AUTHORISING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE i
ff CONTRACT: APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
^~IE THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE PATE.
Alexander motion, McAeams second to adopt the orainance. on
` roll call voke, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye." Gorton "aye,"
r Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
The Council convened into the executive Session to discuss
+ i legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments.
More specifically, to hold a discussion regarding City of
Denton Board and Commission appointments. No official action
was taken.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
yh F ,,~I. _ -RAY SIEPHENS, MAYOR``1,R.
e,~,...•,•> . 'ITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ,i
r Y
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
' . CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
.f 1677C
d 3
~r
. ~4 i
T
/ I
i
L.
r
DATE: 06/16/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
3~ fl
t
}
€ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCE ADOPTION, AND APPROVAL OF A DETAIL PLAN
I
FOR Z-1854
RECOMMENDATION:
i
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of May 13, 1987 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1854 by
a vote of 6-0.
SUMMARY.
This is a request for an amendment to an existing Planned Development
for a psychiatric hospital. If approved, the amendment will permit
the construction of an addition containing eight (8) physicians
offices, a receptionist space, a waiting area, and two group rooms.
BACKGROUND:
The property is located in low and moderate intensity areas and the
proposed amendment will not impact the intensity. <
PROGRAMS. PEPARTNENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
' f
Not applicable.
Y
FISCAL IMPACT
There to no Impact on the general fund.
Rsspeo lly submitted:
" F
Prepared by: Cit Manager
nn t
Denies Spivey
Urban Planner
Ap ov t
z e'1 Jett
1 Direotor of Planning
and Development a
1 2381g/2
a
i
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
F
1
1
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1854 Meeting Date: June 16, 1987
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Jack Price, John Serder representing
Psychiatric Institute of America
1111 Plaza of the Americas North, LB30
Dallas, Texas 75201
Status of Applicant: Architect
Requested Action: Approval of an amended detail plan
for planned development (PD-1). A
psychiatric hospital is currently
under construction at this location.
If approved, the amendment will per-
mit the construction of an addition '
containing eight (8) physicians'
offices, a receptionist space, a
waiting area, and two group rooms.
Location and Size: A 4.849 acre tract located at
,2026 W, University Drive.
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - North Lakes Park - A
South - Retail - PD
East - Retail - PD
+ West - Retail - PD
i Denton Development Guide: Low and moderate intensity area
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: One driveway from U.S. Highway 380, a
primary major arterial, is permitted.
Utilities: The existing 10" water line beir.;
j extended across the frontage of the
' property must be looped to provide the #
required fire flow of 1,5u0 gallons
per minute. The existing 10" sanitary i
sewer has sufficient capacity for this
development.
9
i
i
i
(Case Z-1854)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Drainage: The property is located in the
floodplain. A concrete channel and
culvert improvcments are required
for this tract.
HISTORY
j The property was originally zoned local business with conditions
in ordinance 64-2 as planned development (PD-1). The original
ordinance has been amended on numerous occasions altering or
eliminating conditions; however the planned development status
has not been changed. A detailed site plan permitting the
development of a 50,000 square foot psychiatric hospital was
approved by the City Council in August of 1986.
ANALYSIS
q The property in located in low and moderate intensity areas j
according to the Denton Development Guide. This property was
originally the site of the Denton Osteopathic Hospital and
r Clinic and neither the change to a psychiatric hospital nor
f the proposed amendment will impact the intensity.
The proposed amendment will add eight (8) physicians' offices, j
a receptionist space, a waiting area, and two group rooms to the
facility currently under construction. These offices will serve
physicians providing support for the nospital. {
s The lroperty is zoned planned development and the detailed plan
must be amended before construction of the addition may begin.
The detailed plan complies with all requirements of the planned `
development ordinance. The detailed plan meets or exceeds all I
requirements from parking to landscaping. i
i
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of May 13, 1987 and voted to recommend approval of
Z-1854 by a vote of 6-0.
j
r
r
i
(Case Z-1854)
Page Three
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with conditions
3. Deny petition
l E
,
1{ ATTACHMENTS
j
1. Location Map
2. Detailed PlaL
3. Landscaping Plan '
d, Development Standards
5. Aeply Fora Totals
6. Mailing List
7. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Com•l,Iission meeting of May 13,
?987.
h
a
V
f 4}Y r ~ .G ~]t • C
4y 2~
IL ~r+
1'k I
0555e
r , H 1 , •]f 4 e7
I
1 '
1 ]rdt •
a
ti
a
a~ fpP •
IYNMO yL
fravamM
•18
VNIKRbTY lam, ~ O t':~
cog
_ _ ~ dam
c~a~c
ou Li
.WI R•[t rYC lyJ I Ay yNl1 IdM TI =rl■~ r
r-.~"°a ^rl wttr\1\•'r.al\ f '.i1. ~ I ISdd11
y
'ny` a
YrIMY I/
1111 I. -
r- yyy ey Yya aaou
- wryn I Zri IIII fl C
•
pr\ ~I 1171 llflLl Gf ~ 1 ^_r rte`
roa: Y.n
_ t 1r n\I1ya Rm
1 O__~.
■ y I~u\I rt - r • ~ ~ 1 ~'.flt Ii0 b
1 _ YwwwJ
_ MI1 Yi
® (~I S11E PLAN _
rrr:aw.r 917E DEkTON
11Yn •urlw
~rylyr W\Ir\ I _
y My: yJ HrA•.~I•~ Ywl Y :y 1.1 nJ1 •w In IN1
I ~~jl•,-1~1 Y4 t14~:Na _ , /L /.N n~M•MI ~•MI
♦F.w Inr lw
.~"Iwrw~wlA n.I.w YN.Iw+~r+
■rY • w~Y.YIr IfM rM1~M1l i°\ wM
1YyN•I~~ 411 Y1•n IY IICIRI r Y M i1 1r
II,.~1M • M 1Y~w X111! FyIrn1l\TY.•!1~1 •II~M
C~ y11~1I•~ly~ yy~NMr F Yrllyrnrl~R1111Ir1V~•Yn~r1.y. 1~~
3 ~~1'•T~~~FII Y~4 ~ ± V y y
3Flr•.II~•rwr1Y1. 4I~ T ' _I
ni i10 1~'Firz.w1 'I'lvw~l'!•Iw1r'11
rryr, r 1,1N\y G"r.I'I`i'rY~w~1••/.I.•~~Nyyr
Yy1~Y ~Y~IMY~+K1M w M wrwlwr~il1 N
rM YI.1M rwI • YN1.I YW MII }
IMY rpIFY•~~ rr lurl ►n'Tw 1j wF~
t ~~wN~rT1~l1I r: Mwl A. I
I 1
t IY~NIIyI r,., NIINn1."..f..r:~wi M~n~i111 r,
PIA =KyTCK t = y
f
r•rrii1P, 1331
A r ilalr ~t .I ~,i
l ~
'1Y
t~
I~<
r ay
5 r~J /i VSIV L i
/ 4~Mr 4I py~„~ i
046
ar f/s lre
l/ - 7Wdwe `
X11 ~ ,
~ 1 1 ~/•ri1,•r ~`~wl,~Yayf'~'- t, L1~1 1
, J 1 ( i ' , 111 \i ~ F/1~' r:.
/ ~1 •.1 1 ` IJ • i 1. 1 I ` rte,,, i 'I
n
1
1.
nj
,I
i
PLANT MATERIALS LIST
Shade Trees
Live Oak
Red Oak
Cedar Elm
Chinese Pistachio
Goldenraln Trees
Ornamental Trees
f
Bradford Pear
i ` Yaupon Holly
Crapemyrtle
Purpleleaf Plum
Eldarica Pine
' Shrubs
^ 41 Fraser Photinia
Nandina
Junipers
Indian Hawthorn
~r{1a r Dwarf Crapemyrtle
Savannah Holly
~t t Groundcovers
Asian Jasmine
~.+1°.1 Junipers ,
Dwarf Hollies
Dwarf Hawthorn
j,
k
e44
wj )ryG is l° ~'I ~ ~ Ir ' A is
e G~ rt•
S* r I
i
~~`l 1 r"ri t d
I f ,it
k 'if «5 '
u
I ,
7
1 to
DEVELOPMEFT STANDARDS
DETAILED PLAN
1. Statement of Intent of Owner:
The MOB Addition to the Denton Psychiatric Hospital consists of 8
physicians' offices, a receptionist space, a waiting area, and two
group rooms. These offices will serve physicians providing support
for the hospital. The construction is the same type as the hospital
and will commence as soon as all permits are issued.
2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guide:
The project is located in a moderate-intensity area. Its use would
be compatible.
i r
3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed District:
4.85
war.
4. Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tract:
Total Proposed Acreage
a. Single Family Detached _
` b. Single Family Attached (townhouses, cluster, etc.)
r
co Attached Patio/Garden/Zero Lot Line
' d. Duplex i
i l
e. Multi-Family
f. Office
g• Neighborhood service
k
h. General Retail
k i. Commercial
Light Industrial
r _ { k. Heavy Industrial ;
1. Other (specify) Institutional 4:85 s
~.y 1
i ~
S ,
'I
r~
I
Development Standards
Page 2
i
5. Off-Site Information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existiry or proposed improvements.
i (Shown on concept or ittailed plan.)
f
A
• 6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.)
11.4 trips/bed = 11.4 x 76 = 867
7. Building a
' a. Approximate location. (shown on concept or detailed plan.)
J I`J
_ b. Maximum height: f
248-10" A.F.F.
' c. Minimum setbacks: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) )
r ~ ~ k
felt.
f I
d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidential:
I
3,575 SF for MOB Addition
s 53,575 for total building '
y ' ~ I
S. Residential Subdivision: NA
'r a. Number of units per acre (density):
b. Number and location of lots: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
co Minimum size, width and depth of lot.: (Shown )n concept or detailed plan.)
a:
f z. j
d. Minimum front, side and rear yard setbacks: (Shown on concept of detailed plau.!
d.
1 ~ c
Developmcnt Standards
Page 3
9. water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks,
ponds, lakesP floodplainso other water retention or major drainage facilities
and improvements. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) {
ri
10. Utilities - location of all major sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
11. Location of trees 3' in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
F (flown on concept or detailed plan.)
12. Open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parka, common and recreational areas.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
E
r a\{
13- Screening - locations type and size of all fences, terms or screening features.
!1 (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
" f 14, Development Schedule (concept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will
~"k 6 jy be submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of
development, All dates should indicate month and year.
I 1
~4 n
d I 1~ 3 F l
>y
w r
1"a
P T
rt ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN s
lSs Landscaping Plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used,
Ref,_ Landecane plan
1 1 ~I
{
4
~ 4l{
1
1 r~
i
I .
Development Standards
I
Page 4
~ j
i
16. Signs - show location, type and size on detailed plan; otherwise, sigma must
conform to Article 17 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Ref. plan I
r 17. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.)
.
(
18. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A
(Denton Development f.'-r:) of the Code of Ordineacea.
j (A separate plit is required.) L`
/ i
19. Development ScU dull (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month
and year. z
t ~:a Building start: October 1986
< <`F Addition start: As soon as permit is issued
Building finish: November 1987
1
4
V{14Gk ~ = ~
~ l
b
ab
3/a7
1
Y vl i:A Ada..
i
1
i
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
2-2854
a. i
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
i None Received None Received
• ' k
^ i
Y I
t t +{,1
1 1
y~1 P
} C
, if
J)yy r
{ ~ Mt ,r ] II i~ b~
r ~ ` , k e
M ~
f 1~f
~ t r. I
7i~t r S
3
I ~ 1
,04
y t 6 i.a. ~ ~ 5
n d 1
9 :
P Y la : ~ Jry Y~I
it ti y
^
1 t ;
P N 1 t ~
n t a
Y
qcM 144 sao-W -
r
E Al -Tor
~o =
r
r
-v,, tin
I
C~ u
5.~ ^ x111
r'o
r
`7
I
40 56 f
g `CI rtTPrArl~a_<
i ~
I
y
r! C~
a 11) S rn
om r«c~'ttr
I
f
i
_ 6borle,
,J
r I
I`
i
7 3~
!
~a E N
I
k.
gl
I
1
Minutes
planning and Zoning Commission
May 13, 1Sb7
The re ular meeting of the planning and Zoning commission of the
g
City of Denton, T'eras was held on WeJnesday, May ll, 1987, at
5:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of tae Municipal Building.
Present: E+'.tne Brock, Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, Ivan Glasscock,
Judd Holt and killlam kamcan
Absent: R. B. Escue, Jr.
Present From Staff: Ellraheth Evans, Planninf Administrator; Denise
Spivey, Urban Planne r, Lecile Carson, Urban Planner; Rick
Svehla, Deputy City Manager; Robert Nelson, Executivc
Director for Utilities; John McGrane, Executive Director
for Finance; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney'. David 1
Ellison, Assistant to the City Manager; John Cook, Pire
Chief; Dave Ham, Director of Niterihastewater Utilities;
Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities; Steve
Brinkman Director of Parks and Recreation, Jerry Clark,
City Engineer; Ron Bowling, Airport Manager; Ross Litman,
Exergency Management Coordinator; Lloyd MClendon, Utility
6 Budget/Rate Administrator; David Salmon, Civil Engineer;
Chris Smith, Administrative Assistant; anA Susan Mitchell,
r y~ Secretary
%
Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meettug to order.
iN
MINUTES
A, It was moved by Ms. Brock, seconded MsmlColesand the
unanimously carried (6 0) to app of - regular meeting of April 22, 1987.
B. It was moved by Mr. Claiborne, seconded by Mr. Glasscock
9 and unanimously Barr W (6-0) to approve the minutes of
< the special called meeting of May b, 1987. G
11. PUBLIC NEARING
j~Z-~18S/. Petition of Jack Price and John Serdar, representing
L> ! t e sychiatric Institute of Acerica, requesting epprov a of
e an amended detailed plan for a 1.819 acre planned development
(PD-1). The property is located At 1OZ6 West University Drive
and shown n the Robert Peoumont Suvvey, Abstract No. 31. A
psychiatric hospital is cv'rrently w,der construction at this
location. if apprevel , the amendment wS11 permit the construc-
tion of an addltion ctntaining eight le physicians' offices,
a receptionist space, a waiting area, and two group rooms.
yr B R Seven votices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet;
" three reply forms were received to favor, no reply forms were
: received in opposition.
f #
PETIT/OILR; Jack Price, howard k. Smitl. 5 Partners, stated
t r t at a was available for questions.
x +
IN PAVO,t: None present.
d
yam,,
oPPOSEi:: None present.
i9 } fM
STA'r REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that the property 15 located y
n ow anHTmoderate intensity aress according to the Denton
Development Guide. She said that this property ta,originally
the site of the Denton Cstetpollkc hospital and Clinic and
neither the change to a psychiarric hospital nor the pprcpused
It. amendment will impact th^. Intensity. She said that the pro-•.~,,
`t
7
P 6 2 hlinutcs
May 13, 1987
page 2
posed amendment will provide space for eight (8) ;hyslcians'
` offices, a tecept onist area, a waiting area, and two group
rooms. These offices are intended to provide support for the
hospital. the property is toned planned development and the
detailed plan a,uat be ,,mended before construction of the
addition may begin. the staff recommends approval of Z•1854.
I Ms. Brock ask.:d if there would be a provision in the planned
1 development to prevent leasing of these offices. Ms. Spivey
1 stated that there is nothing currentlyy in the planned develop*
ment to yyrevent leasing but St could be nitthd as a conditioni
generattouslftiheeea rcreeeightddoctors notelnvolvedtwithrihec
hospital leasing spa.I -
REBUTIAL: Mr, Price stated that currently the Psychiatric
i
nst tut,) of .'<s;erll t has no intention of leasing space. He
said that if irastnee occurred in the future it would be a
minor traFflc additior when conslderiny a hospital of this
site with over 100-1SU employees. he said that additional
traffic would to insignificant and an additional condition
would be unaecessary.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
„ t LECISIOY: Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of I-ItS4
an(r giconded by Mr. Holt.
ad ld be a very good
Mr. r Y'.v Claiborne stated that he felt this wou
addition to the overall facility.
Yota was called and motion unanimously carried (6
7 a
cuNSIDERA51ONS
A. FINAL PLAT OF INB WHITNEY PARk ALUITIUN, Lots 1.21,
a
( oc , an o s • block b,
` i STAFF REP017: Ms. Spivey stated that this Is a 945 acre
s e a is toned single famliv (SF-10) and is located
adjacent and south of Lon grid a Drive approximately 700
i feet east of Teasley Lane. S~e srid that Lynhurst Lane
} . and Savannah Trail, both resloentsal streets, ate proposed
for extension. She said that the Development Review Com•
7 mt tee recommends approval and the plat co plies with reg•
x ulotions on utilities, drainage and streets.
'x Mr. Claiborne asked if the Engineering Department would be
a p` j discussing the drainage. Ms. Spivey stated that to her
I knowled a all departments have reviewed and recommended
approval of the plans.
tt
v E Mr. Claiborne stated that he had been informed that a
person had beer. Jigging in their backyard and found a pipe
that did not appear on maps, hr. Clark stated that the
r;`---3 water/Sower Department checked on this and stated that it
was a french drain coming off Peebrooke. He said that
Yir it Strange, the owner wrote a letter saying that he
wou d attemppt to direct tAe drainage e.ross the new street
into the existing drainage pattern.
Larry Luce property owner of Block IR on the southwest
corner of kembrooke and Longridge, stated that he brought
a this to the attention of the city staff. He told that
isit summer he asked the city to raise the troy.%former pad
because the pad was low. He said that after thr ttonstor-
"I
ter was relocated, he discovered a pipe that was 1e-20
inches in diameter and buried about 7.8 feet. He said
that water runs year around and he does not know where the
trench drain leads. He said that a surface swele will not r~
r..
a
.
28451.3A.
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 86-165 TO PROVIDE FOR AN
k AMENDLU PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED PLAN FOR 4.8 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED At 2026 WEST UNIVERSITY DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM
( PENALTY OF $IOUO.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
I EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 86-165 provided for approval of a
detailed plan for a hospital within a planned development zoning
district containing 4.8 acres of land located at 2026 West
University Drive, as more particularly described therein; and,
i WHEREAS, Psychiatric Institute of America, represented by HKS
Architects, has petitioned for amendment of the approved detailed
plan; and,
A S
WHEREAS, at a public hearing held on May 130 19879 the i
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the
` petition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF rHE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That Ordinance No. 86-165, providing for the
adoption o a detailed plan for the planned development district
therein described, is amended by the approval of an amended
z+ detailed plan for the district; the ame:ided detailed plan being
shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, so that hereafter the district shall be subject and
governed by the amended detailed plan herein approved.
SECTION II. That the detailed plan attached to Ordinance No.
86-16 a ExT~it "B", is repealed.
p SECTION III. That a'copy of this ordinance shall be attached
to ordinance No. 86.165.
SECTION IV. Any person who shall violate a provision of this
ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any uf the
requieedrents thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued
thereunder, shalt be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine
not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person
shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every i '
day or portion thereof during which any v:olation of this
ordinance is committed, or continued, and upo^i conviction of any
such violations such person shall be punished within the limits
above.
i ,
I I
r
l
That this ordinance shall become effective
SECTION V.
fourteen ~ days from the date of its passage, and the City I
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this
t ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, j
the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten
(10) days of the date of its passage.
s ,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1987.
jp RAY SrEPHENSo MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
4'1
;IV
ATTEST;
" r
OFFER
sr► `,,`a ~ATON, TEXAS b
C
r,k APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
as'? DEBRA ADAMi DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
yf CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
r rf
`i
BY, 410.
X t,
a ~ ♦ v s
r i
11
n
I1
FIELD NOTES
All that certain tract of land situated in the Robert Beaumont Survey,
Abstract Number 31, Denton County, Texas; said tract also being a tract
shown by deed to First Texas Medical, Inc. as recorded in Volume 1264,
page 313 of the Denton County Real Property Records, Denton County, Texas,
and being more fully described as follow;:
Beginning for the southwest corner of the tract being described herein at
an iron pin; said iron pin also being the southwest corner of said First
Texas Medical tract, and the southeast corner of a tract shown by deed to
Shaul C. Baruch as recorded in Volume 1443, page 05 of the 0erton Coun'Ly
Real Property Records, and also being in the north right-of-way line of
U.S. Highway Number 380; 1
Thence North 01 degrees 33 minutes East, along the west line of said
First Texas Medical tract, and the east line of said Baruch tract, a
distance of 931.19 feet to an iron pin for the northwest corner of the
herein described tract; said iron pin also being the northwest corner of
said First Texas Medical tract; j
Thence South 86 degrees 38 minutes 01 seconds East, along the north line
of said First Texas Medical tract, a distance of 227,81 feet to an Iron
pin found for the northeast corner of the herein described tract; said
iron pin also being the northeast corner of said First Texas Medical
A tract, and in the west IIne of a tract shown by deed to G. R. Wilkinson as
1 recorded in Volume 345, page 148 of the Denton County Deed Records;
Thence South 01 degrees 33 minutes West, along the east line of said
tract, and the west line of said Wilkinson tract, passing Wilkinson's
southwest corner, the same being the northwest corner of lot 1, Block 1 of
the Ace Addition as recorded in Cabinet C. Slide 330 of the Denton County
Plat Records, in all a distrance of 924.26 feet to an iron pin found for
the southeast corner of the herein described tract; said iron pin also
being the southeast corner of said First Texas Medical tract, and in the
north right-of-way line of said U,S. Highway Number 3801
Thence North 88 degrees 22 minutes 41 seconds West, along 4e south line
of said First Texas Medical tract, and the north right-of-way line of said
U.S Highway Number 380, a distance of 227.10 feet to the Point of
Beginning and containing 4.849 acres of land.
r f
I
J j
sr.
i
i
E I
f
j
l
EXHIBIT "B"+
A,
DETAILED PLAN FOR DENTON PSYCHIATRICT HOSPITAL,
CONSISTING OFt
,
1. Detailed Site Plan (1 page);
a' 2. Landscape Plan (2 pages); and r
2 ,y 3. Development Standards (4 pages).
FN ,
~~I A •i Y. 'a
~l A r 1'A r ` ~ a 1
r
i >1
FK r 1 y ~ I Nk,
fqq
] *p y11 5 ~ ' Y ~ 1
i
1 Y Y Y
I ?
It
yl~ S ~}f'i x r
2-1854 (PD-1) r'.
' " cl
ids
.
i
w YK'I AiYp r.N I • rI M.1 Moo AI r F
i ~ wl r.IU1N1 ror r:o.n
''~IRJr IP1. W1YNI 10NMNAV {._:7~-7 '\VI I I q I ~ I[11I
Ywa wnw IY.M ~r1YMN
Imro° ~r._..__.--- NrNHM Ir{
YI~W{ ■rwf qwl I I ~
ws C '_f
C__ WYNY hwW
I , n nm !!f[lfl;l L_-~ reaimiol• _ - ~1 r`~'~ . r~yryiY
I 1 n .r a
1 . L . 1
. 1 ~r1 NM
01 $lTE PLAN
Iowinw•r I
SITE
OENTON l IQW6
rw lray yN~, YI~r yy .1I.. Y
I Fi. ~Y~~rYIN MNMIN1~ ` , 1
~rrYz~ YZr1~,'!.-spry..
r~.~M1111 w~IMM.~N YI/
is li Per rN. WN / A wr
k, IM 'r~, RIM r~
N]°IIY
~rLw ~To
nW-x
Y~1y»y:~~~I I. /flrl~ 1:INN.~NY.,~~ A~17 Irk IaY21~FW V~Y INM
p~ 1a
PIA y.~y.....~T~N../~.1 , FOO HOSMAL
.{•!1
/5~~;/JJ y ~V. ..l Y ~~jj+~~y
♦~1r1;y
T11,Y~l
C V ~ r) A
Jam` 1W~ • /µ4I ~.''l .-.,-i.^L M' ^ 11 { y
y
d!
A n^w~A'/O{/'~ all rM y y ,
Y 't ~•7 ~ ~ 'J ~r '1'2a.'r1' ~rt T ~~1 r♦ ~I- i.. .a r 1~ ,
! 4•"r • r f I y ~ 1•
t
Y ♦ a t f r'' 1
k'. Y R~~.Tr.~• 1.~~~~f ~r Y• .r l_`~M~' . y4.y/~• 1
ft"V
. It
n
y
'/y~ a,•I'J,! ~~'b/W/M~~!lr~yl.rj I1 ~411^y1^7" r i`/7 - I'
r 'F!' ft ~ I 11r
C 1 • ,`r 1
ii i 1 • '
r^..w.` ._.~.n_~r~r_.~..-.... _.r.ra_r.._.....~........__....._ n._.. ~ ._....._...-i._....rru. ~....r..n..__...~..yuMMM~
J .
1
PLANT MATERIALS LIST
Shade
Live Oak
Red Oak
Cedar Elm
Chinese Pistachio
Goldenrain Trees
ornamental Trees
i
Bradford Pear
Yaupon Holly
Crapemyrtle
Purpleleaf Plum
Eldarita Pine
Shrubs
F Fraser Photinia !
Nandina
;a Junipe, i
Indian Hawthorn
Dwarf Crapemyrtle
Savannah Holly
R S r
Groundtovers <
Asian Jasmine
v
t `
Junipers
Dwarf Hollies
' x1 Dwarf Hawthorn
',f{
r [ , t
C
Y
~ it .'G
x
e F F ' , ' iT
h 1
Apr : ~m
'
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DETAILED PLAN
1. Statement of Intent of Owners
The MOH Addition to the Denton Psychiatric Hospital consists of 8
i physicians' offices, a receptionist space, a waiting area, and two
group rooms. These offices will. serve physicians providing support
for the hospital, The construction is the same type as the hospital
and will commence as soon as all. permits are issued. +
i
2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guider
The piloject is located in a moderate-intensity area. Its use would
be compatible.
3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed Districts
y .r 4.85
A ,
4. Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tract:
:y A,
Total Proposed Acreage
a. Single Family Detached
b, Single Family Attached (townhouses, cluster, etc.) _
v,
co Attached Patio/Garden/zero Lot Line
d. DUP10M
e, multi-family -
to office
g. Neighbothood Service
h. General Retail
i. Commercial
l f,'
Light induarial
k, Heavy industrial
1# other (specify) institutional 4-85
4.
,
,t .
,r
Development Standards
Page 2
j
i
5. Off-Site information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
4 ~
6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Projected Traffic Generation. (eased on traffic study, if required.)
11.4 trips/bed 11.4 x 76 867
7. Buildingss
I `
a. approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan,)
b. Maximum heights
24'-10" A.F.F.
c, Minimum setbackss (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
d, Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidenttals
;a; - 3,575 SF for MOB Addition
_ 53,_575 for total building
B, Residential Subdivisions NA
k {
s,
1 a. Number of units per acre (density)s
b. Number and location of lots (Shown on concept or detailed
plan.)
c, minimum also, vidth and depth of lotar (Shown on concept or detailed plait.)
r
u d, Minimum front, side and rear yard setbacks (Shown on concept or detailed plan,)
t
.
i
,
c
t
:0 1
a
I
i
Development Standards
Page 1
9. Water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing ur proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or mayor drainage facilities
and improvements. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
j
{ 10. Utilities - location of all major sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
i '
ll. Location of trees 3' in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
i
4 12. Open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parks, common and recreational areas.
(Shown on concept or detailed planel
i
r
` 13. Screening - location, type and size of all fences, berms or screening features.
d'I (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
~ !A r
114 Development Schedule (concept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will
be submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of
development. All dates should indicate month and year.
a
R, )
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN
15. Landscaping Plan -major features and types of landscaping to be used.
Ref. Landscape plan
r
F~
,
J
Development Standards
Page 4
!
It. Signs - show location, type and size on detailed plans otherwise, signs must
i
conform to Article 17 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Ref, plan
17. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plank) f
I
16. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A I
(Denton Development Codel of the Code of Ordinances.
(A separate plat is required.)
.E
19. Development Schedule Idetailed plan) - indicating start arcs completion of
1 construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month
and year.
j Building starts October 1986
Addition starts As soon as permit is issued
t.+ f:
Building finishi November 1987
1
I'j
♦ , 4
k~
IJJ
i .
a ~
k q. „ 1:' 1 „Ili,
ab
'I
i
{I
DATE; 06/16/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 3,881
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
E FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
j
I SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 212.12 ACRES
BEING A PART OF THE I. COY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2121 J. AYERS SURVEY,
ABSTRACT N0. 21 B. BURLESON SURVEY, ABSTRW' NO. 651 N. COKER SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 2491 AND THE R. JOHNSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 666, (A-46)
r ` RECOMMENDATION:
!I i
The Planning 1:d Zoning Commission will make a recommendation at
its June 241 1987 meeting.
!I SUMMARY:
The proposed annexation is a strip 500 feet to width for a distance f
of 3 1/2 miles. The City of Denton extraterritorial jurisdiction f"
extends to the same 3 1/2 mile point at this aim and this annexa-
tion would extend the city limits to its northernmost point along
I-35,
BACKGROUNDt
y In January of 1986, the City Council completed an annexation of a
700 foot strip along I-35. A number of property owners requested
that the strip be reduced to 500 feet, and the City Council repealed
the annexation ordinance at its May 5, 1987 meeting. The intent of
this annexation is the same as for the previous annexation which is
r
to permit the City of Denton to extend its city limits to the east
1 and west of I-35N as needed when additional development occurs along
this corridor. The existing city limits is a 1,000 foot strip along
PROGRAMS, DEPARPMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDe
k Property owners and the City of Denton, The majority of the 3 1/2
mile strip at 500 feet will be highway right-of-way.
' FISCAL IMPACT:
An impact analysis has not been prepared.
Respec ly submitte, 1
A/ e.2 X/
Lloy arre 1
Prepared Dye City anager
Cecile Careol
Urban Planner
i
1J . Appr e
61
Jeff Me i
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
11131,
~ r!
i
1761L
A ~6
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: L
' f
The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the
territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the
City of Denton.
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the ity Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the e( day of
1987, at 7:00 o'clock P, M. in the Clt`y council C 6 ILL
ers o the
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, fo all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
place all such persona shall have the right to appear and be
heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested
in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
A Public Hearing will be held by d.before the ity council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of ,
1987, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C t ouncil C ers o the
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
lace all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested
A f in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
pv
a r
RATE S' PENS t YOR
CITY DENTON, TEXAS
AT%E5T:
r
did,
ACT CITY SECRETARY
:i
4 I
r h.... w+wiwwawarVa~~....~uPoea:JE,:bd48+.~!'4a•'Pdia}s~1 ..,'r~:a e+a.,.. a»q. ,.s ...,.,pyy4,•MP,
i'
L%hIbIT "A"
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Lento:., State of Texas, and
being part of the I. Coy Survey, Abstract No. 212; J. Ayers
Survey, Abstract No. 2; the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract No. 65;
the N. Coker Survey, Abstract No. 249; and the R. Johnson
Survey, Abstract No. 666, and more particularly described as
follows:
i1 BEGINNING at a point in the present City limits, said point
lying in the north boundary line of a tract described in
Ordinance No. 69-0, Tract VI, said point also lying 250 feet
west of and perpendicular to the centerline of I-3S;
1
THENCE northerly 250 feet west of and parallel to the centerline
of said 1-3S the following four (4) courses and distances; (1)
north 10 58' west, a distance of 2,197.22 feet; (2) north 00
S3' east, a distance of 6,174.83 feet; (3) north 90 02' west
a distance of S,206.05 feet; (4) north 20 501 west, a distance
of 4,897.93 feet to a point for corner, said point lying 250
feet west of and perpendicular to the centerline of said 1-35;
THENCE north 870 10' east a distance of 500.0 feet to a point j
for corner, said point lying 250 feet east of and perpendicular
j to the centerline of said 1-35;
.
THENCE southerly 250 feet east of and parallel to the centerline
f of said I-35 the following four (4) courses and distances; (1)
south 20 50' east, a distance of 49870.b6 feet; (2) south
90 02' east, a distance of S,222.4S feet; (3) south 00 53'
f west, a distance of 6,2US.77 feet; (4) south 10 SRI east, a
distance of 2,184.78 feet to a point for corner, said point
lying in the present city limits as established by the tract
described in Urdinance 69-40, said point also lying 250 feet
east of and perpendicular to the centerline of said I.35;
y' THENCE south 880 02' west along said present city limits,
assing at 250 feet, the centerline of said I-35 and continuing
or a total distance of 500.0 feet to the PLALE OF BEGINNING and
containing 212.12 acres of land.
s. ,
4
x
~ ~ Ry
15 "
[ r1Y y, ' u~ r .
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the goverr,ing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing; an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
j area which is bounded as shown on a reap of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service: i
I, Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
` B. Fire a
1' I
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
t on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
y will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
,
t t i! a
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4,09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas,
5
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
j
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page twu
i
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- 1113
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
need j
policies of the city,
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
r # sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation, r„
P H, Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
qpv`,' ~ encompass the annexed area.
I 1. Street Lighting
j (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
r' policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K, Electric Distribution
} rx.f (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
y electric power.
,r
f
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
i
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
I The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is policy guide-
lines by such
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas i
based partly on density of population, magnitude l
r of problems compared to other areas, established I
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
` (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
»z tC ~
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer,than one year from '
r.
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
k: established criteria as all other areas of the city.
v7 'j!
F j 1 Y Il. i.,, ,4
.V
( N
J ` it ~ r 6 i
Ir
G 4}M r
4 • 1 3
~I t
Nye ,13,1. Y fir,
F ~ r
^ e,. »I
a
i
An M"Oldwa
AM=3W BW
} o'tl • 1 ' '1 ;T• 'MC941'a :l as 1 C•
C mtbuUCr~rt Ad -~•~o
c~:t •r r 1•
• Icro• wrIeAi•°C Ae QQd r'••' 40
M o r Sanger City limits mc
S'tKI I Y. • e . A d:
E J P sod $60' 1 Emit i
T-4.
Pit
R lo,
1 q •A •tr a,~ sn r. si r.A r A 1
A/ ' : •
dj ~ f
• 1 . . o\ r e:
Lr Inl • rfe,
I Iff in all. III
~~aass
1 kLSe bled wo•nd'~► A•4Q.:.' , ' 1
v \
K•, a r is
• AE; r lsaseat Dentdn City-Lim 90 To. Ad
s •0•nt•r Ae O~te. °d
~Ex sti.10 0 i I ~i
r ~ , r y
• I , 1 / •
r•nen
3e f~S = r .!E LB^y=+r _
tUM I f
Sol. I
.
~ff ;
PAP
J' .
r r
:060 hf%941 -4e,
r '
C' rf~...
d! • d 1 •i ? 1 .
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
A-46
✓ May 5, 1987 City Council sets date, time,
and place for public hearings
May 17, 1987 Notice published in Denton
Record Chronicle for first
public hearing
9
May 31, 1987 Notice published in Denton
Record Chronicle for second
public hearing
+ ✓ June 2, 1987 City Council - first public
hearing
June 16, 1987 City Council - second public
F
hearing
h
,E June 24, 1987 Planning and zoning
Commission makes
recommendation
r p'
,f,I July 7, 1937 City Council institutes
annexation proceedings.
July 12, 1987 Publish ordinance in Denton
k Record Chronicle
% August 18, 1987 Final action by City Council
f i yw~
Y) ~t Y+ 5 qi
~1 c f tF~ 4 1_
1. '
R + y
t .Y
e 4 51
Y
S v ~
I y ~ ~ t 111 •
Ir .A
23369
r ~ y~' r t1 1
~ a
LI \wa R,IaMW« Iv-W:, r,.. ..,urv n nY:...
I
t
DATE: 06/16/87
{ CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOWT
i
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
PROMS Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS ABANDONMENT AND QUITCLAIM OF GREGG STREET BETWEEN PONDER AND FULTON
STREETS. (Q-67)
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning and zoning Commission recommended denial of the request
at its April 22, 1987 meeting.
SUMMARY:
The City Council held a study session on this item at its June 9,
' 1987 meeting. Traffic counts performed by the Engineering Depart-
ment indicate 50 percent of the traffic on Gregg Street is church
related. Visual counts done by the Planning Department indicate
substantial use of the street by other sources during non-peak houra.
' BACKGROUND:
Grace Temple Baptist Church requested Board of Adjustment approval
of a parking variance in 1980 and the Board of Adjustment granted
the request with the condition that by July 14, 1986 the parking
pa requirements would be met. In 1984, the church requested abandon-
4rV cent of Gregg Street but took no further action until February of
ai 1987. The Development Review Committee recommended denial and the
Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended abandonment.
r t-
n 1
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS APFECTEDS
5 Grace Temple Baptist Church, City of Denton, and citizens who use
14
y the street.
r Fa FISCAL IMPACTS
a fly The City has estimated the value of Gregg Street from Ponder to
Fulton Street as t320000.
.
0 ti Respec ly s mit
ti wt s
.a
poa
L oyd arrell
a Prepared by: city Manager
Cecile Carson
' Urban Planner
Jeff May
e:.G:stive Director for
elanning and Development
REQUEST OF GRACE TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH
FOR QUITCLAIM AND ABANDONMENT
OF GREGG STREET
1 PHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS
l Grace Temple Baptist Church owns property between and along
W. Oak, Ponder and Fulton Streets. A portion of Gregg Street
i bisects the church's property for a distance of approximately
I 365 feet between Ponder and Fulton. The church has acquired
I approximately 1/3 of the tracts north of Gregg Street between
Ponder and Fulton to accommodate future facilities and current
requirements for parking. Two more tracts may be acquired if
negotiations work out well.
Gregg Street is a standard residential street with 50 feet of '
rigb.t of way and 20 to 22 feet of improved surface (two
lanes). The street runs from Ponder to Mounts which is a
r distance of approximately three blocks. The distance between
W. Oak and Congress Street is approximately 1200 feet. The
distance between Gregg Street and Congress (the next through
t street north of Gregg) is approximately 1000 to 1100 feet. A
typical city block is 400 to SOO feet long. The sebdivision
and land development regulations permit blocks up to 1000 feet
long.
BACKGROUND AND 11ISTrRy
Ay The last significant building program undertaken by Grace
r A, Temple was construction of a new sanctuary over an existing
parking lot at the corner of Oak and Fulton in 1981. A total
of 188 parking spaces was required in connection with the new
sanctuary. The church requested a variance of these space3 in
June,' 1980, The Board of Adjustment tabled the request on
Y June 9 and approved tl,e variance on July 14, 1980, with the
condition that the church provide 2/3 of the required parking
within three years and all of the parking within six years.
The church has not provided the required parking to date but it
has replatted recently and has actively pursued funding and
property in order to come into compliance. The church also
understands that it cannot receive permits for additional
buildings until it satisfies both old and new requirements for
parking spaces.
Gregg Street Quitclaim and :.bandonment
Page two
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
The engineering and traffic divisions analyzed the request and
t presented its findings to the Planning and Zoning Commission
and Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission, Traffic counts
and 24,ti1987. using Traffic reand Street
circulation patterns on were March
also
observed.
During the 8:00 to 9:00 a,m, period, 90 cars entered Gregg from
i Ponder. Of the 90 cars, 48 parked at Grace Temple or dropped
off children for day care. From 4:00 to S:00 pp.m,, 47 of 89
reportssIndusing icate Gthat In Street a 24 were
hour church eriodrapproximately lEngineering
the traffic was attributable to people using thechurch pa281 of
rking
lot north of Gregg Street and probably exiting on Fulton. The
engineering division also feels that a percentage of traffic
can be attributed to re,idents pulling in driveways, yet are
being counted as straight through movements.
The engineering and traffic analysis concludes that Gregg is a
% non-essential street primarily used as a shortcut to get to
Fulton Street from Welch. The Planning and Zoning
a Commissioners opposed to closing the street cited the need for
as much circulation as possible in this area. They were also
concerned about precedence and neighborhood impact, factors
that cannot be expressed qurntitatively,
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION
The church first approached the Development Review Committee on
May 22, 1984, At that time, little was known about plans for
the use of Gregg but the church Indicated that it probably
would like to build over the street one day, The Development
M Review Committee did not react favorably at that time because
of the high degree of uncertainty. The church decided that it "
would firm up its plans and come back at a later date,
The church came back to the Development Review Committee on
October 9, 1984, but the information and results were no more
conclusive than those on May 22.
On February 27, 1987, the Development Review Committee
considered the matter again, The church had acquired more
property by this time and its immediate and long range plans
were more concrete. The church's immediate desire was to move
forward with the development of an educational building and
possible placement of temporary buildings for nse as
classrooms, It was at this point that staff reminded the
church of its obligation to provide the 188 parking spaces
deferred in 1980. The church representatives acknowledged
their responsibility to provide the parking before seeking
approval of new construction.
Gregg Street Quitclaim and Abandonment
Page three
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION (continued)
i
The Development Review Committee considered this item for the I
j final time on March s, 1987. The engineering and
transportation operation led the majority of the committee in
stating that there was no objection to abandonment if the
church agreed to relocate utilities at its expense. The
planning staff raised questions about neighborhood impact and
asked if the church would consider adding a residential street
at the northern boundary of its property. The response was
that construction of a new street was probably cost prohibitive.
' The Development Review Committee does not officially recommend
quitclaim or disposition of public property as a body unless
there is unanimous agreement that there is no existing or
future public need. The request was forwarded to the Planning
and Zoning Commission with a recommendation of denial,
t,
BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning and Zoning Commission was scheduled to consider
this item at its meeting of April 8, 1987. The Commission
i forwarded the request to the Citizen's Traffic Safety Support
i Commission for a recommendation before taking action.
The Citizen Traffic Safety Support Commission considered the
request on April 13, 1987, and recommended approval by a vote
of 4 to 1. A representative of the church spoke in favor. No
one spoke in opposition.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reconsidered the request on
April 22, 19870 and recommended denial by a vote of 4-3, Staff
presented its analysis and two people spoke in favor of the ;
request. One person spoke in opposition, Owners of property
immediately abutting a street proposed for abandonment are
' notified by direct mailing. Grace Temple Baptist Church owns 1
' all the property abutting that portion of the street in
question. Therefore, no one else was notified.
ALTERNATIVE STREET AND COST
As mentioned earlier, the concept of building a new street
a farther north on church property was discussed. The latest
discussion took place on June 8, 19870 and the church simply
does not feel that this is a workable solution. Their
reasoning Is partially based on financial considerations, but
they also pointed out that the land area that would be used for
a through street would take away from area that is needed for
parking spaces,
w!K.uSp rY it '~:irF FPM l .>r. i.
s
i
Gregg Street Quitclaim and Abandonment
Page four
ALTERNATIVE STREET AND COST (continued)
Standard residential streets have 50 feet of right-of-way and
31 to 34 feet of pavement width, curb and gutter. The City
Engineer feels that a street with 24 feet of width and no
3 parking would be satisfactory if the church chose to pursue
this alternative. The City Engineer also indicated that it is
technically possible to construct an adequate street with less
:I than SO feet of right-of-way. The City would have to be
compensated if Gregg Street right-of-way is deeded back to the
<1,~ church. The City right-of-way agent has appraised the value of
this 14,000 square foot section of Gregg Street at $32,000.
Assuming a trade of right-of-way and expenses associated with
construction only, cost of a 24 foot street is estimated at
$24,000. A 31 foot street would cost approximately $28,000.
Gregg street is in fairly good condition and would not be
scheduled for any maintenance work for 3 to S years. However,
if the City participated in construction of a new street at a
level approximating maintenance costs, the church's share would
` be reduced by approximately $1,500 to $2,000.
1
If
qN
i
~ 4rs i
rI , I
o
3504M
~d
f•
I
f„
5
L.1 U !~J L= LL_°'11r-1 _ :00 ~ zoo - '
A~4 1300. 1200 Tp0 Goo 0
5000 9 9~ svh ] Q c°P
18 0 00j 1400 13001 Iq0 700 600 S00 470 300 K
Iv Rsi wESrwar 8 g
_•JI RY ~ 1 1~' ~
ICN ST d rr~~ nn O
' )RP L ' C RD(Ll. Q
TNIR g
HAD
T CRESEhT AN
1100 1000 900 900 700 100 N cohD : I'
] T N -
c~i
IN ~ ~ ~ - ] ® SAw• R ~ Qi 1
I 1300 100 1100 81 O I 4, itxas- ]
NO 400 a ,
HA, PANNANM I° a Q O wIT XCR j
n 13 1400 1300 120 1100 1000 9Is
~~❑❑0r ~ N i = 04L~
)w (4!N
t IEl0_ AL SS ] 5`
700 TIot 1700 ~n s o RxwArll za ® C/2 OEQpA~
1900 13M 1200 ' A4XRSON --t~
r O I~ A 1
pro
c ~ ~G8 N.fNe1 3' ~
4 Pto ® 600 S 11400 xS 200 300 H 'A A, p0 1700 16 w OAK _
OF 0410
1900 ] W.
NICK R Fool NICE^QRY
l
~ ~ I 1 MUL/ PIfY
M 111
w I I 1100 1 400 300 Q F ] ] D
SrtdMOP XXII AVOR[
SYCAMORE
[ ] X Nu all II 1000 j l
PRAIR( pRAIR( r : 400 300 wuR
J
'V =G4A%~
dlu ~ e f f
? U-T p ' 1 Q 1~- - ~ 11
R ~ MAPLt fD ~f ~ I
11 E 16 UAL
l J a
_ u u a
0 I~BOJ I R 160 400 1300 12' 00-- 4~ I SDD S \ ~/y rN i L
n
~~1~
~ r ~ 5
I L..J,~K, 3po 400
~ u MAA o A 1 M 1
/6'' ~ ~ ! r- C` cc °•u°
~rI-1l"~o0 8 i
I1200' a
LJL, /'oa ~J~ s 'l$
a o
} uh ~ ~ • 1~ I N
TO: DAVID ELLISON
FROMr GRACE TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH
DATEt JUNE 9, 1987
;;UBJECT: MOVING GREGG ST. TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF GTBC PROPERTY
4 1. Those going north from Welch Ste to University would not be impeded by
using Congress to progress north on Fulton. This would eliminate excess
1 traffic on a very small street (Gregg St.) which is used daily by many
child and adult pedestrians. (Re(. attachment 'e)
2. Moving Gregg St. 363 feet to the north end of GTBC property (Ref, attach-
ment "A") maintains a convenience for relatively few people at a cost of
$24,000 to $28,000 (Ref. city engineering report attachments "B" 6 "C").
This report reflects 50% of the traffic on Gregg to be church-related. A C
GTBC count further collaborates the fact that approximately 30x of the traf- !1
fie using Gregg turns in to use its parking lots. These would be North
Texas students and/or teachers who park and walk to class. Therefore,
the vast majority of the people using Gregg Ste are either church-related
or students and teachers who use the church parking lots by permission.
This leaves a rather small group of people who access the street as a
mutter of right of way. The cost to move Gregg St. 363 feet does not seem
' justifiable in terms of the benefit derived by so few.
r'
y
3. Moving Gregg Ste to the north end of GTBC existing property will
mean the displacement of approximately 70 parking spaces. GTBC is currently
under a directive by the City to provide 300 parking spaces.(Ref. letter
from city, attachmint "D") This is in proportion to a 900 seat auditorium.
GTBC is 167 parking spaces short at this time. With the existing properties,
GTBC can just barely provide the 300 spaces required, Reducing this by
70 means we would have only 230 spaces and would continue to be out of
compliance.
i t^
J r " 4. CTBC has spent some $400,000 over the last three years, and will spend
another estimated $75,000 in the next year trying to comply and cooperate
with the City in this effort to provide adequate parking,
Therefore, it seems inconceivable that moving Gregg St. to the north of our
existing property would be acceatable to either Grace Temple Baptist Church
,r or to the City of Denton,
Respectfully submitted,
Grs4e Temple Baptist Church
5
i
! V I/ 14 1 IS i 12 II a ! 1 7 r 12 II IO / / 71 ?D A K rr f K 4 IS i2 Il r I i
I r r I
® ~ I
i
I I ! 7 4 I t t 2 S♦ I I 1 S ♦ S/ 7~ ~ I
VIE
400 1 7 ! s;+ / 7, 1 3 I K IS 12 11 a 1 ` 1 I.
. I I rr ,r •f a I i M, 1 I
I
® r r rl'
J
f ! 2 3 4 2 314 ( I ! S 4 S
N ~ L'~' 1 , I s 1
x
J ;96 3 ! u s r l i
• I / ! i 34 1 11 4 i
-Trw~rr r.~~r1~ w
us Tit-
1.1 1 7 ~ SS 7 ~
}a 7
1 LI 1.1 I rl S2 I a 15 14 13 12 II a let
1 ~ 1
t „
Y I I•( w-i r I ! r-L~11~7'
dvo 10 --w w
! I as II ( I 1 S 4 111
1 1 I t l 12
r l / 11 ! I I 3';
17
1 t
t I 21 K it 11 n Is
to I/ I II a / 1 11 T ) 11
Il .Y r 1 - I - I /
yy~ 1 ~ • . • w ~ . '
~1~/Plr•llft~~Mw..rn.rr...w .r._........-.. _ . .....n..a., n i,, avn
. w~::i,. -~9 a ,•r r',n+ x......,Sl.rnnMa~wr~+ii VrH+hWxMO».•_•..
URC ml MES
n n ,
Keview of
1. ENGINEERING:
A, Requirements: (Tnese Items are required by law, ordinance,
code, approved procedure or recorded policy).
r-
]1
• 1
~ r +
y:A
r
QAeJ
•
rr~
rrw_~r~ ww~r
B. Recommendations: (Not legally requlrbd, but recommended Item
that could Improve project des)gn).
4189 1-----t--~--- ~
a AMM
ID
CITY of DsNTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texas FMI ;
MEMORANDUM
i
DATE: April 6, 1987
TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Abandonment of Gregg Street Right-of-way
The Engineering and traffic Divisions have researched the
possible abandonment of Gregg street right-of-way between
Ponder and Fulton. Traffic counts of the vehicles using uregg
street were taken on Narch 23 ana 34, I5b-.
Traffic patterns in the area were obser%--d to make sure we
could relate the traffic counts to real tr.Ititc movements. ':he
traffic counts immediately show that about 300 people art taken
off Gregg street into the church parking lit -to the north and
probably exit on Fulton street. that n ovement amounts to 281
of the total traffic on Gregg. A certain percentage prob& y
Also o in and out driveways on Gregg so are reflected as
? stralg t through movements.
F An important issue with relation to this abandonment is the
pass through traffic using Gregg street to get to Oak and then
to Welch street. This same movement would be available if
Gregg street were closed. That route would simply be to take
Congress directly to Fulton and down to Oak to Welch. There
are several reasons that explain why that route is preferable.
` First, Congress and Fulton are both collectors. Regardless of
their site now, Capital improvement funds will be allocated to
these roads to build them to proper collector sized streets.
Second, their collector status will Insure their pavement
surfaces are maintained and rebuilt on a more regular cycle
than residential streets. Third, Ponder Is a residentially
classified street that already has a significant load on it
from hospital traffic and also from residents of the many
apartment complexes In the area. '
i. ,WM1M n.T 11 .~..'e •w. n. ...i. ."i Ir • +i
'
X
f
page 2 of 2 pages
! In summary$ it seems that no major traffic patterns are being
disrupted by closing-the street. The majority of the traffic
on the street is from the church. Those using Gregg to get to
Fulton to Oak can easily turn at Congress one block to the
north. The extended length of the block can be solved by
requiring a fire lane either through Gregg street or a parking
lot to the north. The church has presented their statement of
need in a letter. Hopefully, your evaluation of that letter
and this memo will aid your final decision on abandonment.
c ry tk
ty neer
cc on Rick Svehla
Bob Nelson
Bob Hagman
01535
yI \
, l Y~ J
rig y q ,
Y
a Y
Y ` 1
, v
,d
i
Y ti
.5~
' iII.W141MY'Wtu.Yy.W M.a.,'..,-. .«-•ai[n'...ar .r. ..,...n..e. Ji.
LL
Y
iw '
WrYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
k
i
July 16, 1980
i
Mr. Gerald Stone
P.O, Box 1985
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: BA-1212 t
Dear Mr. Stone:
' This is to inforn you that your request for a variance of 188 parking spaces
was approved by the Board of Adjustment at their meeting of July 14, 1980 with
the condition that the church will provide 2/3 of the required parking within
thhe (3) years, and all of the required parking within six (6} years
Should yyou have any questions regarding this decision, please feel free to contact
ne at this office.
s j Sincerely,
Charles S. Watkins p
r Development Review Planner
CHisw
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
,
•
tf
J
i
I
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 22, 1987
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zonin Commission of the
City of Denton, Texas was held on A rii 22, 1187, at 5:00 p.m.,
in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Eullne Brock, Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr.,
Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt and hilliam Samoan
sAbsent: None
Staff Present: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spiveyy, Urban
Planner; Cecile Corson, Urban Planner; Elizabeth Evans,
Community Development Manager; Lloyd Harrell, City Manager;
John McGrane, Execuitve Director for Finance; Joe Morris,
Assistant City Attorney; David Has, Director of Miter/hM
Utilities; Jerry Clark, City En1lneer; Paul lwuchukwu,
Transportation Engineer; Ross L tman, Emergency management III
Administrator; David Salmon, Civil Engineer[ Chris Smith,
Adainstrative Assistant; Vincent Gaines, Ads Instrative
Assistant; and Susan Mitchell, Secretary
Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order.
1. MINUTES
A. It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Ms. Brock and
motion unanimously carried (7.0) to approve the minutes
of the joint meeting of the Public Utilities Board and
the Planning and Zoning Commission of April 1, 1987.
1 B. It was moved by Ms. Cole seconded by Ms. Brock and motion
unanimously carried (7.05 to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of
April B, 1987.
f It. C0N'SfNT AGENDA: It wts moved by Mr. Escue, seconded by
s. sae an motion unanimously carried (7.0) to approve
the consent agenda as follows;
A. Approval of preliminary and final plats of the Avant
Addition, Lot 1, block A.
B. Approval of final plat of the Grote Temple Baptist Church
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
111. CONSIDERATIONS
A, 67. Request of Grace Temple Baptist Church for abandon- ;
men and quitclaim of that portion of Gregg Street located
f between Ponder and Fulton streets.
Mr, Escue made the motion to remove Q-67 from the table.
Seconded by Ms. Brock and motion unanimously tarried (7.0).
STAFF REPORTS Mr. Clark stated that the Grace Ten Dle
1 ap s church has plant to expand and they are Interested
In obtaining Cregg street In order to build across the
street. He said that the on Ineerin1 staff has analyzed
the traffic counts and $04 of the traffic is church use.
He said that Gregg Street is being used as a shortcut to
get to Fulton Street from With Street. He added that
k.~
i
• ~ this tame moveaent would be available if Greg Street were
closed. He said that the route would be simply to take
Ponder to Con a rots directly to Fulton. He said that the
Cititena Trafito safety Commission recommended aliroval.
He said that the Utility Deportmont his a sewer no and
y' it would become private because it Is for the church use.
TAe Electric DOeparttent has electrlt lines in the street
and is requaating that tAey be coved at the church s
01
.3
P 6 Z )4nutes
April ZZ, 1917
Page 2
added expense that and fithe re lanes church are has being agreed requested Movement.
by e the t firee
ad
Department.
Mr. Holt asked if there had been a study done on how many
students live on Ponder Street. Mr. Clark said no but that
there are a number of North Texas State University students
living on Ponder Street. Mr. Holt asked if these people
were notified. Mr. Clark said the agenda was published in
the paper but no individual notices were given. Mr. Holt
stated that the Idea of abandoning Gre g Street bothered
him because n this rightaofatrthat aveluis
Greg Street
g
i not being taken away.
~ Mr. kamsan stated that he felt the abandonment would create
problems.
PETITIONER: Roget Hollar, pastor of the Grace Temple
apt st urch, stated that renters and students use their
parking lot for free parking while attending school or vis-
itfn He said that eventually this area will be cleared
of toe houses on their property and activity buildings and
parking areas will be built for church use.
IN FAVOR: Greg Edwards, member of the Grace Temple Baptist
sire , stated that the primary function of Gregg Street as
ing of the streetewillsbeoalsafetynAspectafortthe church.
OPPOSED: Mike Cochran 609 West Oak Street, stated that ;i
e use this street quite a bit to get across town and to
' I his home and would not like it to be closed. He said that
E he understood their position and if Oak Street wasa two-
way street he would not mind if they closed Gregg Street.
j DECISION: Ms. Brock stated that there are pros and cons
-on-TRY-sides but that she felt there would be a serious
1 traffic concern in this area if the str;reserving et was closed, She
concerned about setting a a-
addeds thhot in at she t was spirit
said tion ,She this
' precedent.
Mr. Holt stated that he felt the shortcuts in the city
were very toportant and that he was very concerned about
the clrculatlon and neighborhood if the street was closed.
Mr. gamman stated that with the street, people would use
the parking lots as a shortcut which could prove hazardous.
' Ms. Brock moved to recommend denial of Q•67. Seconded
voted3no, Nr. Claiborne,
Mr `
.MEScue,eanddMr. Glasscocke -
8. RE UEST FOR SANIIARY EWER SbRVICE outside Denton city
m s or us a orpora on Due's country Store
located on 1-30.
a' STAFF REP0R7: Mr. Ham stated that the Muskett Corporation
as su a aced a letter requesting permission to tie onto
the City of Denton sewage system due to an inoperative
tic tank and drain field system. He stated that the
sbeulk of this property lies outside of the Denton City SSa -
Sts with the exception of a strip along the frontage of
I.3s. He said that the Muskett Corporation proposes to
install a lift station and construct a forced main from
Love's Country Store on 1.33 to the City of Denton lift
station at Hi hway 77 and 1-35, a distance of about two
costs. He saidCorporation
that o the is Publicsume
miles. ull H burdend of h the the Muskett
the f
• L
i
k s
j
Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission
April 13, 1997
PRESENT: Doris Chipman, Mike Amador, Vivian Edwards, Bruce
Chamberlain, Gene Gohlke, Virginia Gallian and Bruce
Chamberlain, Chairman
ABSENT: Wayne Autrey and John Toppkins
STAFF: Paul Twuchukwu, Traffic Engineer Associate
Joe Thompson, Tratfic Foreman
Clovis George, Officer/Police Department
ITEM 11 APPRUVAL OF MARCH 21 1967:
The meeting was called to order at 500 p.m. on
Monday, April 13, 190, Bruce Chamberlain made a
motion to approve the minutes as written. Duris
Chipman seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously.
Items 12 and 13 were reversed to accoiimouate the scheduling of
petitioners.
F ITEM N3 GREGG STREET RIUHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT:
F j I'aU1 Iwuchukwu said a request had been made to the
City of Denton for an abandonment of a right-of-way
easement on Gregg street between Ponder and Fulton
,y streets from Grace Temple Baptist Church.
Paul presented a viewgrapii indicating location of the
` right-of-way abandonment. He said one reason for the
request, was that the church owned property on both
' sioes o. Gregg street. There is a day care facility
? on the south side. Children cross the street
frequently to the north facility.
Paul said the City staff analyzed traffic flow in
this area. Most of the traffic is generated by Grace
t Temple Baptist Church. If the City abandoned the
right-of-way, it would impose no unusual difficulties
on day to day traffic maneuvers.
I Paul said the staff would like for the commission to
consider movements around Gregg street from Welch
coming down Ponder, from the hospital, from Fulton or
Congress. Paul indicated on the viewgraph alternate
routes motorists could take if that section of Gregg
street were closed, He added that these alternate
R
~ age 2 of 2 pages
4 ~
i
routes would also ease the overload currently
expo.cienced by Ponder. Ponder is classified as a
residential street. Fulton and Congress streets have
priority over Gregg street. Most of the future
street expansions in this area would center around
Fulton street.
Roger Hollar, associate pastor for Grace Temple
Baptist Church, came forward to answer any questions
concerning the request. He indicated, on the
viewgraph, future building plans for the church
incorporating the abandoned easement.
Gene Gohlke asked if the street were closed would it
remain a City street and who would maintain it, Mr.
Hollar said there would be a fire lane there and it
would but maintained by the church,
Gilbert Berstein asked how the street would be
closed. Mr. Hollar said the City would have to issue
a quitclaim deed and the property would revert to the
church. Then they will close the street according to ;
a'x w{ City regulations.
Gene Gohlke asked who would pay for barricades? Mr.
Hollar said the City had told them anything done
k , + there would be at the church's expense,
STAFF RECOMMENDED: Approval
COMMISSIONERS$ Vivian Edwards abstained from voting due
to conflict of interest, A motion was
made by Gene Gohlke to abandon the
easement. Mike Amador seconded the
motion. Doris Chipman, Gene Gohlke, Mike
Amador and Bruce Chamberlain voted yes.
Virginia Gallian voted no. Motion passed.
V,
Y p t,
i
S 1
F
i' `r r 3
lp
y.
P 1 E Minutes
April 8, 1987
Page S
RtBU•TTAL, Mr. Edwards stated teat there 1a tout feet be-
tween root lines and the roofs do not overhang property
line.
Chair declared the public hearing closed,
DECISIONS he. Escue stated that this is a definite im-
provement over the other plan and moved to [ecommend ap-
proval of T-1811. Seconded by Mc. Glasscock and motion
unanimously carried (7-0).
1
IV, CONSIDERATIONS
i
A. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE COUNTRY CLUB PLACE ADDITION,
ors - , oc ,
+
STAFF EPORT, Me. Spivey stated that this to a b.5 Acre
R I
rte ocated on the south side of Hobson Lane approximayyte-
la z500 oned e planned development (Country (PD) and C zero Road): aevel-
opment is anticipated. She added that the Development
Review Committee recommends approval.
PETITl01+ER, Oreg Lawards, Metropplex dnyrneering Corpora-
on, eta ed that he was evlilac I for questions.
DECISIONS Mr, Holt moved to recommend approval of the
Lountcy Club Place Addition, Lots 3-3b, Block A. Seconded
by Ms. Cole and motion unanimously carried (7-u).
r " B.( Q-61. Request of Grace Temple Baptist Church for aban-
donment end quitclaim ut that portion of Gregg Street
located between Ponder and Fulton streets.
S STAFF RIPURT: Mr. Clark stated that the Citizens TrattiC
baafety Zrommiesion (CSSCI ham cocaine more involved ano '
t wants to get involved in this request- He seta tnat tnLs
item should have originally etatted at CTSC and felt that
if it did not inconvenience the church and Planning and
Zoning Commission that this item could go on the next
meeting of the CTSC. He added that engineering had no
problem with this request,
Roger H01141, pastor of Waco Temple Baptist Churen,
stated that a is in agreement with the staff on the
r s , procedure.
he. Brock stated that she used Gregg Street frequently,
DECISIONS Mr. Escue moved to tattle y-61 until April Yl,
1 IB87 aver m recommendation of the Citizens Traffic Safety
Committee of April 13, 1981. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock
and mot ton unanimously carried 17-U),
C, ADOPTION OF lNTERIUM POLICY for Northwest Denton
COnCern ng Mena [y,
TAFF "0 , Ms, Carson stated that At a Study esselon
two wse s ago the Commission discussed this item, The
Land Use Planning Committee has reviewed the location of
the high inten:UltifiCktioft ity area which is now known as the north
urban center, She said that the boundaries are described
x' a in the back-up that was provided for the Commissions She
a said that the for this falls under item
number two that state a Development incentives shall be
liven to establishment that generates employrentl there-
tore, these establishments are encouraged to locate in any
of intensity area, urban Centers, Special Activity Center,
civiiamayAinclui, Contact City L MAY lweive lthe application nOf
r
%
2,70 DENTON CODE 1 2.71
the property in accordance with Section 2, Article 5421e-12,
Texas Revised Civil StLtutes, as amended,
(d) Type of conveyance. The city attorney shall determine the
type of conveyance or other instrument to be executed by the city
prior to the initiation of formal bid procedures, and the informa-
tion shall be included in the notice.
(e) Recommendation and action. After receipt and tabulation
of bids or after reaching agreement for a negotiated sale, the city !
manager shall make a recommendation to the city council. The
city council may reject the sale or award the sale by resolution or r
ordinance. Upon approval, the city attorney shall prepare and }
the city manager shall execute the appropriate instrument of
conveyance. (Ord. No, 85.254, 11, 12.17.85)
See, 2.71. Requests for abandonment of public easements
or right"f•way.
(a) Application by property owner. A property owner whose
property abuts or adjoins a public easement or right-of-way may
apply for abandonment in whole, or in part, of the abutting
right-of-way. An application must be accompanied by,
C " ( (1) A nonrefundable application fee of one hundred dollars
L~100.00);
e 1 (2) The written concurrence of all persons who own property
contiguous to the area proposed to be abandoned; and
k (3) Copies of recorded deeds showing current ownership of all
property contiguous to the area proposed to be abandoned.
I (b) Appraisal of value. The city staff shall make an appraisal or
obtain an Independent appraisal of the property to determine the
I market value of the area proposed to be abandoned. It the city
j chooses to obtain an independent appraisal, the applicant shall
s, deposit with the city an amount of money sufficient to pay the
t cost of the appraisal. The date for establishing the market value
j shall be the date, as determined by the city manager, or his
` designee, that the applicant meets all the requirements for appli-
cations for abandonments.
* Sapp Na So
180
,
. E
i ,
i _
1271 ADMINISTRATION 1 2 T t
j (c) Cases of disputed value If the appraisal performed or ob-
tained by the city is disputed by the applicant, the applicant shall
obtain a second independent appraisal at applicant's expense. If
the city manager determines that there is a substantial differ-
once between the two (2) appraisals, an independent appraiser
shall be retained to perform a review appraisal, the cost of which
shall be paid by the applicant. The city manager shall then make
a final determination of market value based upon the appraisals
and the review appraisal.
(d) Planning and zoning commission's recommendation. When
a proper application has been made, and the market value orthe b
area to be abandoneJ determined, the request for abandonment
shall be submitted to the planning and zoning commission for its
recommendation to the city council.
(e) City council action. Based upon the recommendation of the
city manager and the planning and zoning commission, the city
council shall consider the request for abandonment. Before the
city council officially acts to abandon all or part of a public
right-of-way, the applicant shall pay the determined fair market
value of the property to be abandoned to the city. (Ord. No.
85.264, 1, 1217.88)
a H r' ~ f " is
tom; jy j
t;
1
•t
Sapp, Na 50 IThe nrxl pe,,e V• 18 31
' , ~ 181
Y 'I
A
',J I
f 1 ~ • 1
Y
yT {
11 N•
Y 'I
f M ~
'1 '
g izing
n in
grace
grum ternple baptist church
Ron Feliemends, DMin. t
Pastor
Xogs r W. Hollar
Ar soclate Pastor
{ Rand•llBardin March 12, 1987
If;nlster of Musts
NedDavldson
Mlnlster of College
Scott Langston
Minister of Yo u-h Hr. David Ellison, Chairman j
Development/Review Committee
DlorlsKizer City of Denton
Mrnrste of PrescA00V
Children 215 E. McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mrs Ellison: i
RE: Request regarding Gregg Street
v r Grace Temple Baptist Church of Denton is hereby requesting the city
of Denton to close and give a qu!,tclaim deed to Gregg Street between
Fonder Street and Fulton Street. {
The reasons for this action being granted are as follows:
a j 1) Grace Temple Baptist Church owns the property on both sides
of Gregg Street between Ponder and Fulton (see exhibit A). It
F} would not interfere with any entries to any property that is not
" x owned by Grace Temple Baptist Church, hereafter referred to as GTBC.
r
2) In the near future plans are being made to build an educational
building immediately behind the present educational building and
, sanctuary. With the building of this building, it will increase
pedestrian traffic across Gregg Street, not only on Sunday, bttt also
during the entire week because of the weekday ministries that GTBC
carries on. With this, the possibility of a pedestrian-vehicle
accident increases.
GTBC is also in the process of obtaining more property that will
surround the immediate church area, which means that we can
continue to comply with the parking mandates, and at the same time,
the residence need for Gregg Street diminishes.
~r I
r'I
f y
i'
1106 uxst oak denton, texas 76201 (817) 387.6137
L „.I
Y
Page 2
Mr. Ellison
March 12, 1987
3) We at the present time operate a day-care at GTBC. We have in excess of,
one hundred children at all times from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Children being
} children, they are prone to slip into harmful situations before anyone can
guess that they will. No one plans for this, but we are realistic enough
to know that these things happen. Therefore, it would provide a safeguard
for the arriving children and the departing children, their parents, and an
unsuspecting motorist. With the limited use of this street, it seems as if
the action would be a judicious one.
4) Coupled with this previous point is the general age of the persons
presently using Gregg Street. We are in a high multi-family dwelling area. 111
We have many of the houses rented to University students. Statistics tell j
us that this is the age group that tends to drive with a somewhat more {
"aggressive" nature. Insurance actuaries rate them in the high incident
group. With this being the composition of the average user of Gregg Street,
we have coupled the worst of two situations: children who are filled with
an adventuresome independence, and drivers with a youthful abandonment zeal.
The combination is bound to cause a problem somewhere in the future. E
I am not sure what the moving violations count is for the area surrounding f
Oak, Welch, Gregg and other near-by streets in this area, but I suspect that
they are sufficient to warrant a strong and anticipating action in the matter
of closing the street.
1 S) We suggested that perhaps talc ng a count might be a wise thing to do
concerning this matter. This weold give a somewhat more accurate indication
of the use of Gregg Street. However, it will be affected by the number of
parents who drive into that street to pick up their children from day-care.
,i We, of course, would provide the parents an access and a method to safely
` get back on the public streets of Ponder or Fulton.
6) There has been a concern about emergency vehicles' use of this street.
One of the things that would be there is the fact that most of the property
behind the church will be dedicated to use as a parking lot, with ample
entrys and exits for use by the congregation. In an emergency, these could
be used for getting to a fire or other emergency situation.
s,
Another concern is the close corner at Ponder and Gregg which disallows a ]
piece of fire-fighting equipment from making the corner without turning and
then backing again. It appears that nothing will be gained by having this
street designated as an emergency thoroughfare.
Page 3
Mr. Ellison
March 120 1987
7) Gregg Street is a short street. It is only four blocks long, and GTBC
owns all the property surrounding one of those four blocks. If one comes
up Welch and must go back to the east, then to Congress and come all the
way back to Gregg that is, by automobile odometer, .05 tenths of a mile.
This will add only about a minute or so out of the way. It is our belief
that it will not inconvenience all that many people.
Of courae, Gregg Street dead-ends at Ponder. Therefore, the traffic F
to the west will only be that which comes from Oak and that area. Fry,
Bryan, Normal and Jagoe streets are not crossed by Gregg as illustrated by
I the map (see exhibit 8).
F ; 8) There is, from the maps that are indicated in your offices, a minimum of
utility considerations. The present electricity that serves the houses
down Ponder will not be needed, because GBTC owns those houses and intends
to raze them and subsequently pave those areas for parking. Other than GTBC,
f the only other line that seems to serve a building is the one to the Fraternity
house that is located at Fulton and Oak. This could easily be served from
f behind the house on the continuance of Gregg or on Oak Street.
y The only other service shown is the sewer that serves the facilities of GTBC
alone. Therefore, services should not be a problem.
Finally, if this abandonment and quitclaim is not granted, we do request E;
the city to take under advisement the concept of installing speed bumps and
have a closer patrolling of that area.
We believe the need is real, we believe the request is not unrealistic, that
it will create a minimum of inconvenience, and that the benefits will be
overwhelming. I know that this is a difficult decision, but we believe that
it is a prudent decision. These are the reasons and rationale for our
request for the closing and quitclaim of Gregg Street between Ponder and
Fulton.
Respectfully submitted,
r
ort au I
Rona L. Fellemende t
y RF/bb
{
j
y
~ i
i ,
EXHIBIT A
t
a
OTBC N
PARKING
LOTS '
J '
1
Noma
e . Q t w l~f►In~
r i 3 y Tr cc ~ Loo
a 1~
O
<
Z a V O
1 tr -r
A.
1
GREGG
Well
roiling Educjtoon
L01 F Imll Bufldany
may
Ccnlil ,
LY4
j
tloulu
i
r
EXHIBIT B
r
I I
i
.H AD..k!!A►
r m
r '"1
rr. C E$$
9b Lo
r
2 M AN E SON PA AY
,F t y HA N S
0
A
CIIIIIIIIIIIII
e w ~
< < 0
HICKORY to Z
G
y"
r
r
i
DATE: 06/16/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
i
TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM., Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLATS OF THE PONDER
ADDITION, LOT 10
3
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this item
at its meeting or June 10, 1987.
SUMMARY: ~J
k 'Ili1
BACKGROUND:
r
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
t FISCAL IMPACT: r
t s
.i t;
1
y
A:tt Reopen lly submitted:
oy r 1
Prepared by: Cit Zager
De!-'i4eyd
F s ' Denise Spi4yd
Urban Planner
a= Appro
x^
y Jeff Mey
Director or Planning
and Development
' W?S/1
J b
i.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
J BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
I
MEETING DATE: June 16, 1987
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Replat of the Ponder
Addition, Lot 10
SUMMARY: This tract is .418 acres located at the southeast
corner of Scripture and Fry Streets. This tract
is more fully described r,s Lot 10 and shown in
the E. Puchalski Survey, ADStract 9960 Denton,
Texas. A planned development (PD) for a medical
office has been approved on the corner lot. The
other lot is zoned multi-family (MF-1).
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, ` solids wasterareeavailablephone, electrical, and
ti The plats conform to the minimum requirements
of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
` j Regulations.
y The purpose of the replat is to create two lots
approximately ,209 acres in size. The MP-1
zoning requires a minimum 60' X 100' lot. While
f ' ! these lots have only 50 widths, the overall area
F x, i requirement is met. Single family structures may
t ! be built on 501 lots and Planned Developments
permit smaller lot sizes.
;f ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replats
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plats
' 1 R2C+ua, .d~tw
Denise Sp v e~+ f"
Urban Planner
t
! 1742s
7
iI;
i
TES f
s
d i 1
Y ! J~
K~P'fue-f d Esv ~m,J . J~-F7 •AL 1f t
n ~ ' ~'Yl. i._ ems... , ~r Ji k
rn.,.r~, ~ ~~r rs .mot .1` Lru✓wrv/ f x \ f' '
' I r1 z.Y•i w{7 r'r i ..p_'r' ~ ~ ~ 'SLIP f
77 `I L
. L./D: Nf.r 'r BYO , ~
~ r
1 •1, it , 0.1Q
s ...1 wwd ~ \ i ~x „rr 9 ! x1 eiWtr0. ~Ir,~ .D
1•D.M~' vat rsx
• .e ^y r .rya ) r
~bs84. 1/alfr77.~ I/fwfl{ ly"Aq'.4 YeMrnl~sM+ r,
~ ~ . r / G r n ~ SC7~~ ~ '`MrM.rr~r► tn+{o~
n yn A ~'1-- i
n
1 t 1 a I D s
It
ee• •n~ c ICY •rr~
eouf?tf cP sx+~'r , ttx4'~
wNM,
• ~ ~sef Burnt-o , oor'r6r+.~c~s Ii
BUnE ENGINEERING
~91i4' ( BRIAN BUR1tErPE
rr.,rr CONSOLPOIO CIVIL ED41NEEK
~ ' ~ + . oixTOx,uxDD unf uD•mf 1{I
-77
y~ YM r IY r'+
1 T ~rl r Y.rv
)r ~r 41wIL Yr.i rrl. L t~ it w YrY W w
\,MM1 • r~ rYrY Vw IY Y r YY I 4 r►•• ern M. w
ifl::t~l~~ ! 1..u,~`-~NIYM Y.I..4 YY. MNY.•YYN. YwN
1~ w~~~f1 ~~~-'J ~I awYY a~a rlw rw.IwrrYUr YIMMY
M wYrr.Y r.YrYYII/.Y
.w Ny Y.rrY•11.. MM YYU •1-a YIYrC'
y GNA INIC ICALI uIw'r YlrYrlOY.w. rrr.r YMrurw M.'Y Y+
~J~ti - • Y rM wrl YI. wr IY'YdYY Yr W Y Ylwrw Irr.
_ 1 ~ v rllr r.rvrr rrrw rrrrrYy rur wwY
Ir+ t[j' ~ MY YI ~.Y.yYYwr~..Y rrr rrY '
~~y_~{{, ['Y aYw FYY Yr Yy Yr~arW Y. •IMYrw
.r •I'~~~~ "k rr~.4 rn 4rfrM wWY
am r. YYwYIYYww nYrrri wl MY r.Y Y.Y Ir
FY'w IYw w r ~.r YrY Ir rl .r wY Yr Y • IRrI
rw Y.y • rw w rrr . r r✓Y rllrr YIw Y IY YY
•y[ ~ r`Awr walwyM •\MNM rr. rYp YI ~FIY YY wI Iw
~ IwYY f M YY Y rrrY. Y YA . YYI Nn••r . WY Iw Y
flCrNlII MAP wr Yrr..YrrwYyrr rrr wrrr
p 1wY Mw4M IrW. YY W M w\" YrIwY r.'I. rr
N 1P.1\.IUUY M~YM~i~rwwY YmYI
n/r M r ru•Y r wr.w Y Yrr, r Yewi. iiY i w1Y
I•.I .plM1lll •Y=r rFY lyfY WMYM w.
irrw rrrvr rr yiwY rar wY
MM yYY 4MY.rNYV YY r~.rL{YY YyN
_ L~ wr YYw r YrNrM Y.r1. Y YI M Y W .YIY1.
' ~ iY.N•rZr. iy.` itii f I_ _ _ _ YY Y.Y YY IY w Y. Y r YY w M w YI\ r
- w'wlw~r.Y rwf1'~Y.r1YM`Yrvr•~µwM yT
r r.Y • stir r wr n w . ~ :r r~r~.w.rr
w..Ll I r. ii ti~r~Y.wi ~ I:YYrr~ar ~.Y'YY r•L a r w::v
to SCRIPTURE rrr r.iyrrrrrYr.rrYrlrrYw
.Ytir.w re.
STREET urrrw w\Aw im r.. "I'M
h•ry~~~10~1! YI\4Y Yr1Y.rr r•..Y M\ r.YM YW11rrYY
1)I ~II'I ,.11t {lr•N Ix.~•' ' Y~w`i..~li rr..r t1~° ~rw ..IrrN.r .Y
II .Y ar Yrl :IYW iw 1e M. YYl.rw4
~~~__'j, „ Y., ♦ ~ ~~r•YY Mrlw rru.~r~. ~1.Y
I • 'f $li" . E ..r S.IIL ~ I. Y .w wYY
' 1 ~ f r w1 • ' ! S.7L'P. Yv, w Ylarlr. rnrr r,L. w it r Yrv Y r.. 'T w $ rY YY rr r4Mrr rlwl lrlr~r/w~~ N•'Yl rl ul fl
~ / ? Y. i. wYP YY10.YrYw lwla Ywr. ,-arwwY
n • \ 1 Y, .Y.`I.• ~w1Y .r Iww Y re.r'YrN WI r MIY rw•
I ~1
16. All
k, Y
at a I'M lot
a < - 1 ' s.Y.s. irr rrln '
k Y! 1 • ~ .IO A.PYRY4 Y.rwwv rrMY~_ ~ J. r.NrW11`W
IAA ~ , Y ,..r YYr••r •~.yii:N::.wlsr:rr~ .M:.m
«~1 Y.rM...r\YMwY•IMtlN r'~•Ir ^u WY'
atY
d
w4tYw Y i- rv1.
rY\ r ral i.
I/YarrI r~M)MYY w Y4wYM.wrr.
r„r rYV.YSYY•~w ~'~.rrM1. ..Y
Y IM.Y4 Y . W y.Y' nwrN MYYrI Ii 1 \ 1'
yI. IYY./rI.r KYrr111 Yn ~~MY~N-r _ 411 N
t a,.-,'LYa1 ArL r N.r r w - REPLAN OF LOT 10 AS -
+r -I• YW „m Y M LOT IOA a LOT 108
."r\.r rMrxYr n.Nr.ma
W A. PONDER ADDITION
rYY Iy yyyj.yYlY WYMWN W~ ar~yw M?y,Kw•~ N; ~--'^-MY w~M,.M Y-.~~ r~•~~~r.,M.YMIYW , CNN OF OENiON
IIYM M~w,wW W~Y•Yw ~~Wl«'. .fir Yr1 n•rMY~wr+~NrWW w.
r».wlr~ rwwY.w "'.«Y^..~ wrw.rm•.._ i,:y„y,.... w.mr.WY `.~^-Wr_~.Y WY':" DENTON COUNTY TEXAS_
wrwYw. II ,!11 F..4rwtl .4Y a .
( } rrr rw MY.11 nww~_y ~~N~ II I. NM M YY.. nY ~Mr mqM wrrw aYYM. MAW - 1. M a.N Ir1..111 11
I1... 111 1 [OL[.IN ~ /[IO[!N[1
' y4YYw Y..♦Y.. n1,1: •N sox 444
MYI bIY YIY YN. ArY Yrm wlYYw Yw. hn r .
' _ wl._..ra,r..r V~•--.. ~n-«„~_ r Lwu n. r Ot1f U0{ 111 Li 1HGt
11Mall. 1'•N•II11
4 hYN..auaY.l
REVISED
~acc71Vr,n III,;y 1) 1987
, _ ._...•-w.M..r.r..wawrlirawO+rr..,~._'
t
•r l
lJ
f
0923L
1
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING I
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. j
E
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
went, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of )
a state law and City ordinances; and
E WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
i WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
materials, equipment, supplies or services, approved and accepted
herein; Now, THEREFORE, '
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numberedH
bids-for aaterials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in
the "Bid Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and
L approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BID ITEM i1
s NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
9751 ALL THE NEW KIBLER, INC. $ 46,000,00
9734 ALL CUMMIt!S SUPPLY 70,190.00
9739 ALL PARKSON. CORPORATION _ 13.325.00
I
' q
c
i
i
SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer
1 of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting ;
approve an accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to
enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the
acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager
or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute
the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided
k that the written contract is in accordance with the terms,
conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified y
sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents
herein approved and accepted.
SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered Items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 16 day of JUNE , 1987.
2777
F ~
RAY V ) 1
Y
E HEN , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
' f ATTEST:
4 '(fi
aF ~ 11
JENNIFER AL ER , CITY SECRETARY
a" CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
r'
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
K CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
at k
PAGE TWO
DATE: June 16, 1987
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
i
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
j
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BIDi 9751 - OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIES
c
RECOMMENDATION: we recommend this bid be awarded to the bidder with the highest
percentage off o manfacturer's suggested retail price, the New Kibler, Inc. at 40% off.
SUMMRY: This bid is for the purchase of standard operating office supplies from
une to May 1988.
n
J
s ~ k
Tabulation Sheet
BACKGROUND:
r
PROGRAMS DEPART11E:tiTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All Departments
E
V ~g~ t
5
t FISCAL II1pACT: As budgeted by departments for office supplies.
s s ht tT i 'r
~ I A•
T a s
Respectfully submitted:
L oy a rei
City nager
Prepared by:
Name; Denis Manning
Title: Buyer
ri
b, Approved:
it r,l ~i
i
o n J. Marshall, C.P.M.
itla~ Purchasing Agent „
i
I ! I 1 1 I I
BID 1 1 4751 1 DENTON I THE I BUSIN:35 I NEVILL I I {
IILTIILE OFFICE OPERATING SUPPLIESI OFFICE I NEN I ESSENTIALS I BU5IKESS I I t
OPENED MAY 28{ 1487 I SUPPLIES I KIBLERS I I MACHINES I I I
ACCO NIT$ 711-113-1582-8713 1 1 I 1 { I {
! I 3 I 1
- -{-----------'-1•-...._
n
oTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 3
..........:..I-------------------------I------------- 1--____-.....-1--._....--°-I------------- 1-------------
I DISCOUNT 1 311 1 111 1 351 1 51 1 1 I
I I 1 I 1 I 1
1 "I I I 1 1 I Z {
2{ 1 1 DISCOUNT ON I I H 1 311 1 311 1 351 1 51 1 1 I
I I PICK UP ITEMS I i I 1 I 1 I
I._ { 1 I I 1
1 I 1 21 II DAY 1 !
1 NET 31 1 1
,t ~ { I i I 1 I 1
!l 1 I I i I 1 1 I `
.I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I
,I ~ C I 1 I I 1 1
I I i I i I I ! ,`,i I I 1 I I I i I
x^ .Ili
t
DATE: June 16, 1987
i
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BI 9754 - PADMOUPlTED SWITCHGEAR
i
i '
RECOISIENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid meeting
specification of Cummins Supply in the amount of $7,019.00 each. Total bid cost is r
$70,190.00 FOB Denton, Texas. I L'
y t
{I
SUMMIRT. This bid is for the purchase of 10 padmounted switchge-.r for use In
the update and new construction of overhead electric distribution lines.
' The lessor price offered by Temple, Inc. is FOB Chicago, IL. The bid
offered by "nester is an oil switch without visable disconnect and fails to meet
specificatlons.
a ,
1 ` i; sq BACKGROUND: Tabula ion Sheet
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution
~tDr] h 'ty ;i ~ ,
r
FISCAL 111PACT: 1986/87 Budget Funds Capital Improvements Electi-Ic Utility
Account k 611-008-0252-9221
Respec Sly submitted:
Yluy.
Lloyd Y. Harrell
City Manager
P ared by:
1 A!'Y~ ~ I Y.. i
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
` r yo f+~ Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent Irk
Approved:
1, i'
N J n J. Marshall, C.P.M.
: Purchasing Agent }
TWO
fy4 , r F'I
Ytr
ill 1.
S yye , f
I I I i I I s I
8iD 1 19754 1 NESCO I CUMNINS I TEMPLE I PRIESTER I SAAYBAR I NELSON i 1.P. I
110 TITLE PADNOUNTEI SMITCHSEAR I I SUPPLY I INC. I SUPPLY I ELECTRIC I ELECTRIC I SEARS I
OPENED JUNE 11 1987 2:11 P.M. I I CO. I I CO. INC. I CO. INC. I SUPPLY I CO. INC I
ACmil I 1 1 I 1 I CO. I 1
l I I I I ! 1
I-----------.-I-------------l-•-----------1----•_-------I-------------I---- --I-------------I
1 ,1 ITV 1 ITER DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR , I VENDOR I
..:.....-1------------------------- 1------------- 1---- l------.---- ---1 -----------1-.-----------
I 1 ( I
E~ t IN IPADNOUNIEI SMIICHSEAR 1 71511.11 1 74119.11 1 61933.11 1 51391.11 1 71618.11 1 71821.11 1 N11 I
l IASSEKOLIES I I I 1 I l I
1 I I I I 1 I 1 I t
1 I type I PME9 I PME9 I PNE9 1 HHH9 i 65152 I VEe-95 I I
a f t I S 6 C I S I C I S I C I RTE I S I C I KEARNEY 1 I
~ 1 I I ! I I I I 1
I 1 1 delivery 1 91 DAIS I 91 DAYS 1 91 DAYS I 1 13 NK6 12 MKS I I
! I t I Denton I Denton I ChICago I Denton I Denton t Denton I 1
I 1 +ddendus 1! I Yes i yes 1 yes 1 yes I yes i yes t I
I I I 1 I 1 I I
1 ~ ( I I I I I
{ t I 1 I I I I 3 I l
I' 1 I t I I : I I 1
•
1
d
I •
F',
. i"
1 U f
A S. •C;
1
DATE: June 16, 1987
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9758 - DIFFUSERS, WATER
RECOlf•IENDATION:
We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Parkson
Corporation at $22.50 each for a total bid price of $15,525.00. It Is FOB Denton, Texas
with delivery In 14 days ARO.
SUMMARY:
This bid is of a nature that there are not many vendors available. We
sent out to the know vendors in this area and received two bids as shown on the
tabulation sheet.
' i
14
J -
: ' BAC1fGRWMO: Tabulation Sheet
y 'Yo f rg 1
q
PR06RAMS9 DEPARTWATS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: This is for the replacement of ! F 1t .
some diffusers at the Water Reclamation Plant and is a repair and maintenance item.
` G~•!' ^ ~','`j FISCAL IMPACT: PACT: Budgeted Utility Funds 620-082-0470-8339. `
1 There is no additional impact on the General Fund.
FYI ` Respectf lly submitted:
r L1oy V, Harrell
City Manager
1
Prepared by:
t f77''y. I Y . j tYt '
ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. N
Ti Purchasing Agent
Approved:
~14, 0~ h . Marshall, C.P.M. r
41 tlef Purchzsing Agent
r •
' F ;I
- I I I
Bit 1 1 9758 1 PARKSD% IENVIRDNMENTAL1 I
BID 111LE DIFFUSERS, MATER I CORP. 11VROVEMENTS I I
OPEW JUNE 99 1987 2111 P.M. I I INC. I I
ACCOUNTI I I I I
I
I............. I------------- I
1 I DIV I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I
I - ° -1------------------------- 1------------- I------------- I------------- 1
I I I 1
1, I 891 111FFUSERS, NAIER 1 22.51 1 31.11 1 I
1 I INCLUDING I I I
I Ilaterlralll wonted I I I I
I Icheck valves I I I I
tsheaths
1' Islalsless steel claps I I I I
l t I I
I I ID1AL 1 15,525.1# 1 21,391.111 I
I I I 1 I
I 1 DELIVERY 1 11 1 81-91 1 I
1 t 1 I t 1
e, 1 ( 1 I S t
1 1 I I I i
t I Z
' I I I I I 1
f
r.
f rf* s ~ a
f
At
` 5 » a `
r.
✓y (i,,, 1,
C 1.1
0
h v
, ~ n,;4 s <a
0923L NO.
j I
E AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the construction of public works cr
improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and
City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
received and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids fur the construction of the public works
i or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals
III and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE, j
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D£NTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the
construction of public works or improvements, as described in the
"Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications
attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the
lowest responsible bids:
l BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
~
9752 R.L. RARFRTS Ct-INSTRUj TION CO., Mr. $341tem-A5
,I
~ F L c '
~q! I
Yyb ! I
4 ~ 1
!ry r' f _
S~ x
C 4
1
~Y 1^~1j T J ~ ~r r
k
SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above
yf competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the
kr+i x City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such
4.
4` t a , i
pM H"' c
x
L
11y~.
x1 "
I
JX y
r
1
!
public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until
such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the
Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written
contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after
notification of the award of the bid.
SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of i
the construction of the public works or improvements in
accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided
that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to
Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto 4
specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, k
standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein.
i SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above
compel tt ve HUs and the execution of contracts for the public
works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council
hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in
the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized
contracts executed pursuant thereto.
y SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the ib day of JUNE 1987. f
1
t,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
ATTEST:
r
IENNIVER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
1
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
_
BY.,
r.a PAGE TWO
i
DATE: June 16, 1587
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
s
i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: B1D! 9752 - LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY PAVING
dr DRAINAGE
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to R.L. Roberts Construction "
Co. the low bidder for all three combinations. We recommend the Combination of Items
a 3 & 4 for the total contract as shown as Item 7 for $348,325.85.
i
SUMMARY: This bid Invitation was sent to our regular vendors and bid list and we
received seven bids. They ranged from a low of 11337,600.85 to a high of $470,008.65.
The bid Included the paving and drainage and right turn lanes at Loop 288 and I-35.
Three options were given. The above recommendation is based on the low bid of Items
' 3 do 4 combined.
4
o?
BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet
Memo from Jerry Clark, City Engineer
4r =
iY
' 11 1
PROGRAMS1 DEPARTHEMTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: 1987 C[P Street Improvement Bond a
c Program.
I
J I FISCAL 1l1PACT: There Is no additional impact on the General Fund.
Respe lly subm t d:
!
x q'i
' Lloyd V. Harrell
,19 ~ 4 sir City Manager
Prepared by:
p f5
A [Sail ',C
~ S r ~ i r
of . Marshall, C.P.M.
itte: Purchasing Agent
Approved:
P,
ci
A
I
I I I i # I #
111 1 1 9152 1 DUININCK I JAGVE I SUNMOUNI I AUSIEN # R.L. I CALVERI I #
III TITLE LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY I BROTHERS i PUBLIC I CORP. I ROAD I ROBERTS I PAYING I #
OPENED NAY 26, 1987 2:11 P.M. I INC. I CO. I I CD. ICDNSIRUCTIO% I I 1
ACEDUMTI I I # I I I # #
1 I # 1 I 1
I------------- I------------- 1------------- 1----------...I------------- 1------------- I
I I OTT I TIEN DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR ! VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
I------------- I--------- 1-------------1------------- I I
i I I I # 1 1 I I
1. I ILILLIM MILLER PARKWAY 1 351,477.91 1 288,597.51 1 3061641.11 1 3940615.14 1 209,471.51 1 $15,317.11 1 #
i IPAVINB I DRAINAGE # I I I I I I I
1 i 1 1 # s I I : :
! ILILl1AM MILLER PARKWAY 1 357,414.15 1 296,122.51 i 395,715.11 1 412,5711.39 1 296,896.51 1 322,732.11 1 I
I IPAVIND I DRAINAGE WITH I 1 # I 1 I I I
'I 11EITURES RIP PAP I I I I 1 I I
I I I I I I I i 1
3. 1 IULLIAN MILLER PARKWAY 6 1 361,109.15 1 317,161.11 1 396,541.11 1 NB I in, 196.51 1 325,217.11 1 I
I IDRIPEWAY Pilo COLDREI 11 1 1 i 1 1 1 1
I IlilPAED RIP RAP 1 I ! I I I 1 I
I I I I # I I I 1 1
RIGHT TIM LANES At 1 75,769.41 1 49,752.12 1 63,115.51 1 75,:93.51 1 48,129.35 1 531913.51 1 I
1 ILOOP 208 AND 1-35 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1
1 I # I 1 I !
5., ;1 11 AN 4 COMBINES 1 426,247.31 1 338,34932 1 449,743.51 1 471,118.65 1 33716N.05 1 369,221.51 I 1
A 1 12 NO 4 COMBINED I 433,383.55 1 345,774.62 S 458,811.51 1 471,969.91 1 345,125.85 1 316,645.51 1 1
1. 1, 13 AND 4 COMBINES 1 435,051.55 1 356,912.12 1 459,643.51 1 Ml 1 348,325.95 1 379,121,51 ! I
{J I I I 1 I ! I I 1
I I Ill BOND I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES f !
i ) I I f I 3 I 1
1 I I I I I 1 I # !
n r~ , 1 dr ~1
.
aP
ri Pr
Vie. ~ j
3
{ Cf TY of DENTON / 215 E. McKlnney / Denton, Texas 76201
MEMORANDUM
"t .
DATE: June 9, 1987
TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Lillian Miller Bid 19752
} The Engineering Division has evaluated the bids received on the
"I"P~i'> project. The unit prices are excellent. We recommend that
Roberts Construction be awarded the bid as they are well under
our estimates for construction.
r ° Y We recommend option 07 be awarded to Roberts Construction.
That option includes textured and beige colored riprap for the
median noses.
4 J S
4p 'rMI~•
s
Jerry Uark
',n~~nd t 7 SF.
0470E
Icy Y ,
O t E % J ~ l
4 Y
1, Ai ~ V
e~~'~a',wl
+ + $
~W~ t1n i Y } ti,ly. ,
't
I ~ r
Joe.
CITYO DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (8 1?)
688-8307
f Office of the City Manager
{ "r
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
a` DATE: June 11, 1987
SUBJECT: 800 MHz Radio System
This week we received a letter from the Sheriff's Department
Y indicating that he was going to recommend non-participation in
t our system to the Commissioners. We do not know how the
Commissioners will receive this. Internally we have been
discussing alternatives in case the County finds that it is
,,sl + unable to participate.
The staff continues to strongly recommend the system to you and
the Council, In fe~.t, we think that the system is of such
St importance that I have had further discussions with the Utility
Department. If the County does not
y participate, then the
In"rs, y second year (1989) would be one of the hurdle years for us.
That is the year we anticipated using the County money to help
us fund the system. We had anticipated County contributions of
$100,000. I visited with Bob Nelson and he still continues to
strongly support the system. He feels that the system would be
of major benefit, not only to the Utility Department, }nit also r:
to the City as a whole. He has agreed that the system is of
such importance that he would recommend and certainly support x'
funding in 1989 with utility funds if the County does not
participate in the system.
Therefore, since the funding scenario that we gave you last
A 'A
time would still be in tact, we would suggest that we continue
r " on with the proposal. We also believe that there is a chance ,
' that the County still may Y y participate, when they have had a
' chance to look at all the alternatives.
Sri if you or the Council has any further questions, I would be
~tiT' Y}~r happy to try and answer them at your convenience,
I~ W 1 I e U+'~'
ART ve
' Do-,uty City Manager
t
rt SS06M
1 ,
R
5
t
R
CITY OF DENTON
unuriES~ MEMORANDUM
i
TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
FRCM: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director, Department of Utilities
a DATE: June 11, 1987
' al Y~
w SUBJECT: 800 Mir Tnmking Radio System
` YI
It has been brought to our attention that the Denton County Sheriff's
Department has expressed the opinion that they had little or no interest
in becoming a part of, or utilizing, our proposed 800 MHz Tnmking Radio
"W System.
The City of Denton Electric and Water/Wastewater Utility systems have
o' analyzed the systems operating advantages, cost and long range
t, capabilities, We feel this sytem to be the answer to our present and
projected communications needs. We have budgeted funds in our Capital
Improvement Plans to convert our divisions in a timely and orderly
fashion.
xz r~ `s" z
We, therefore, feel we will be able to make up any shortfall in funding
which might occur in the 1989-90 budget year resultant from lack of
0participation by the Denton County Sheriff's office, This funding
r
deficit would equate to approximately $100,000 for the budget year
RDW:bw
.'i a 1RDWO61187061
ArjJ t t4 1 A
9
~~IaG ~ 'Xq S~ y .y
; l~ Z~ , ' iZY t i1 `J S
r h
~s.' lf~:~rN r• ~•.%Y
r
S .•S ♦i{.Mnwrw«... , F•a~ra s.bl x J'r1z+i M4Y~r4! Y,M ♦~rw ,r,
r ~
t
r ~
CERTIFICATE FOR
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF
I CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1987-A,
j AND APPROVING AND AUTHORISING INSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES
RELATING THERETO
j
{ THE STATE OF TEXAS t
COUNTY OF DENTON s
CITY OF DENTON
We, the undersigned officers of said City, hereby certify
as followss
1. The City Council of said City convened in
REGULAR MEETING ON THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 1987,
at the Municipal Building (City Hall), and the roll was called
of the duly constituted officers and members of said City
council, to-wits
Jennifer R. Walters, City Secretary Ray Stephens, Mayor
Jim Alexander Bob Gorton
' Linnie McAdams Randall Boyd f
„ Jane Hopkins Hugh Ayer
and all of said persons were present, except the following
absentees: , thus consti-
tuting a quorum. Whereupon, among other business, the follow-
ing was transacted at said Meetings a written j
r ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF f '0
CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1987-A,
' AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING tNSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES
RELATING THERETO
was duly introduced for the consideration of said City Council
and duly read. -It was then duly moved and seconded that said
! Ordinance be passed; and, after due discussion, said motion,
carrying with it the passage of said Ordinance, prevailed and
carried by the following voter
AYES: All members of said City Council
shown present above voted "Aye".
' NOES: None.
`k 2. That a true, fall, and correct copy of the aforesaid
~f Ordinance passed at the Masting described in the above and
foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this Ccrtifi-
Cates that said Ordinance has been duly recorded in said City
Council's minutes of said Meeting; that the above and foregoing
M r
.d
1 t
,
1 .
s
r.
paragraph is true, full, and correct excerpt from said City
Council's minutes of said Meeting pertaining to the passage of
said Ordinancel that the persons named in the above and forego-
ing paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified, and acting
officers and members of said City Council as indicated therein;
1 that each of the officers and members of laid City Council was
rsonallY, in
duly and uufficiently notified officially and pe
~
advance, of the time. Place, and purpose of the aforesaid
and that said ordinance would be introduced and
Meeti.g,
eetingi and that said Meeting
f
assaze at said ~
considered for p i
lace,
to the Publio, and public notice of the timer place,
i
was oPan
quired b
and purpose of said meeting W;s given, all as required by
Article 6252-17.
Vernon 's Ann. Civ. St.
t
3. That the Mayor of said City has approved, and hereby
approves, the aforesaid Ordinance; that the Mayor and the City
Secretary of said City have duly signed said Ordinance; and
that the Mayor and the City Secretary of said City hereby de- 3
clare ttat their signing of this Certificate shall constitute i
the sig;,ing of the attached and following copy of said Ordi-
nance for all purposes.
SIGNED AND SEALED the 16th day of June, 1987.
CiAy- cretary Ma i
a i (SEAL) a:
" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
' We, the undersigned, being respectively the City Attorney ,
and the Bond Attorneys of the City of Denton, Texab, hereby
certify that we prepared and approved as to legality the
attached and following Ordinance prior to its passage as
aforesaid.
i
r 1 .ty At ney
Y,
r on A torneys
k l '
y ~..i
`I y
{
ORD!:iANCE NO, 87-
ORDINANCE
At'THORI7ING THE ISSUANCE, SALE, AND DELIVERY OF CITY OF DENTON
CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1987-A, AND APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING INSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES RELATING THERETO
THE STATE OF TEXAS :
COUNTY OF DENTON
{ CITY OF DENTON
WHEREAS, Vernon's Article 2368a.1 permits the City to
issue and sell for cash the Certificates of Obligation herein-
after authorized) and
i
WHEREAS, the City has duly caused notice of its intention
to issue the Certificates of Obligation hereinafter authorized
to be published at the times and in the manner required by
Vernon's Article 2368a.11 and no petition has been filed
protesting the issuance thereof.
THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY
R ORDAINS THATs
{ Section 1. AMOUNT AND PURPOSE OF THE CERTIFICATES. The
certificate or certificates of the City of Denton, Texas (the i
"Issuer") are hereby authorized to be issued and delivered in
the aggregate principal amount of ;1,1000000, FOR THE PURPOSE
OF PAYING ALL OR A PORTION OF THE CITY'S CONTRACTUAL OBLIGA-
TIONS TO BE INCURRED PURSUANT TO CONTRACTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF
MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT CONSTITUTING A MUNICIPAL RADIO COMMUNI-
CATIONS SYSTEM, AND PAYING ALL OR A PORTION OF THE CONTRACTUAL I
OBLIGATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OF ENGINEERING,
ATTORNEYS, AND FINANCIAL ADVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH
MUNICIPAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTE:: AND CERTIFICATES OF
OBLIGATION.
Section 2. DESIGNATION OF THE CERTIFICATES. Each cart-
ificate issued pursuant to this Ordinance shall be designated:
"CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1987-A", and
initially there shall be issued, sold, and delivered hereunder
a single fully registered certificate, without interest cou-
pons, payable in installments of principal (the "Initial
Certificate"), but the initial Certificate may be assigned and
E transferred and/or converted into and exchanged for a like
aggregate principal amount of fully registered certificates,
without interest coupons, having serial maturities, and in the
denomination or denominations of ;5,000 or any integral multi-
ple of ;5,0001 all in the manner hereinafter provided. The
term "Certificates" as used in this Ordinance shall mean and
include collectively the initial Certificate and all substitute
certificates exchanged therefor, as well as all other
1
i
r
subntitute certificates and replacement certificates issued
k purs,aant hereto, and th3 term "Certificates" shall mean any of
the certificates.
Section 3. INITIAL DATE, DENOMINATION, NUMBER,
MATURI- TIES, INITIAL REGISTERED OWNER, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
a INITIAL CERTIFICATE.
(a) The Initial Certificate is hereby authorized to be
issued, sold, and delivered hereunder as a single fully
registered Certificate, without interest coupons, dated June 1,
1997, in the denomination and aggregate principal omount of
:1,100,000, numbered R-1, payable in annual installments of
principal to the initial registered owner the-e)f, to-wits
or to the registered assignee or assignees of said certificate
i or any portion or portions thereof (in each case, the "regis-
tered owner"), with the annual installments of principal of the
Initial Certificate to be payable on the dates, respectively,
and in the principal amounts, respectively, stated in the FORM
OF INITIAL CERTIFICATE aet forth in this Ordinance.
(b) The Initial Certificate (i) may be assigned and
transfericedt Certificates, ((iii) may have the characteristics, and (iv)
shall be signed and sealed, and the principal of and interest
on the Initial Certificate shall be payable, all as provided,
and in the manner required or indicated, in the FORM OF INITIAL
CERTIFICATF sat forth in this Ordinance.
Section 4. INTEREST. The unpaid principal valance of the
Initial Certificate shall bear interest from thy, date of the
Initial Certificate to the respective scheduled due dates of
the installments of principal of the initial Certificate, and
said interest shall be payable, all in the manner provided and
at the rates and en the dates stated in the FORM OF INITIAL
CERTIFICATE set forth in this Ordinance.
Section S. FORM OF INITIAL CERTIFICATE. The form of the
Initial Certificate, including the form of Registration Certif-
icate of the Comptroller f public Accounts of the State of
Texas to be endorsed on the Initial Certificate, shall be
substantially as follows
2
i
i '
i
FORM OF INITIAL CERTIFICATE
NO. R-1
31,100,000 4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
j STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DENTON
CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATION j
SERIES 1987-A
j
THE CITY OF DENTON, in Denton County, Texas (the j
"Issuer"), being a political subdivision of the State of Texas,
hereby promises to pay to
or to the registered assignee or assignees of this Certificate
or any portion or portions hereof (in each case, the "regis-
tered owner") the aggregate principal amount of
$1,100,000
(ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS)
in annual installments of 'E principal due and
payable on JULY 1
f in each of the years, and in the respective principal amounts,
as set forth in the following schedules
PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL
' YEAR AMOUNT YEAR AMOUNT
1989 $1200000 1994 $1250000
1990 120,000 1995 125,000
1991 120,000 1996 1250000
1992 120,000 1997 125,000
1993 120,000
and to pay interest, from the date of this Certificate herein-
after stated, on the balance of each such is-3tallment of
principAl, respectively, from time to time remaining unpaid, at
the rates as follows
1 per annum on the above installment due in 1989
per annum on the above instr.llment due in 1990
-~rl per annum on the above installment due in 1991
i per annum on the above installment due in 1992
per annum on the ahtvc Installment due in 1993
1 per annum on the above installment due in 1994
J 1 per annum on the above installment due in 1995
per annum on the above installment due in 1996
per annum on the above installment due in 1997
y
,i
3
a
with said interest being payabls on JANUARY 1, 1988, and semi-
annually on each JULY 1 and JANUARY 1 thereafter while this
Certificate or any portion hereof is outstanding and unpaid.
THE INSTALLMENTS OF PRINCIPAL OF AND THE. INTEREST ON this
Certificate are payable in lawful money of the United States of
America, without exchange or collection charges. The install-
ments of principal and tho interest on this Certificate are
payable to the registered owner hereof through the services of
MBANK DALLAS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, DALLAS, TEXAS, which is the
I "Paying Agent/Registrar" for this Certificate. Payment of all
principal of and interest on this Certificate shall be made by
j the Paying Agent/Registrar to the registered owner hereof on
each principal and/or interest payment date by check dated as
of such date, drawn by the Paying Agent/Registrar on, and
payable solely from, funds of the issuer required by the
ordinance authorizing the issuance of this Certificate (the
"Certificate ordinance") to be on deposit with the Paying
Agent/Registrar for such purpose as hereinafter providedt and
such check shall be sent by the Paying Agent/Registrar by
United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, on each such
principal and/or interest payment data, to the registered owner
hereof, at the address of the registered owner, an it appeared
on the 15th day of the month next preceding each such date (the i
/ "Record Date"1 on the Registration Books kept by the Paying
Agent/Registrar, as hereinafter described. The issuer cove-
nants with the registered owner of this'Certificate that on or
before each principal and/or interest payment date for this
Certificate it will make available to the Paying Agent/Regis-
trar, from the "Interest and Sinking Fund" created by the i
Certificate Ordinance, the amounts required to provide for the +
payment, in immediately available funds, of all principal of 5
and interest on this Certificate, when due.
IF THE DATE for the payment of the principal of or inter-
set on this Certificate shall be a Saturday, Sunday, a legal
holiday, or a day on which banking institutions in the City
where the Paying Agent/Registrar is located are authorized by
law or executive order to close, then the date for such payment
shall be the next succeeding day which is not such a Saturday,
Sunday$ legal holiday, or day on which banking institutions are
authorized to closet and payment on such date shall have the
same farce and effect as if made on the original date payment
was due.
THIS CERTIFICATE has been authorized in accordance with
{ the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas FOR THE PURPOSE
OF PAYING ALL OR A PORTION OF THE CITY'S CONTRACTUAL OBLIGA-
TIONS TO BE INCURRED PURSUANT TO CONTRACTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF
MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT CONSTITUTING A MUNICIPAL RADIO
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, AND PAYING ALL OR A PORTION OF THE
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OF ENGINEER-
ING, ATTORNEYS, AND FINANCIAL ADVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH
MUNICIPAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AND CERTIFICATES OF
OBLIGATION,
THIS CERTIFICATE, to the extent of the unpaid principal
balance hereof, or any unpaid portion hereof in any integral
multiple of ;5,0001 may be assigned by the initial registered
owner hereof and shall be transferred only In the Registration
Hooks of the Issuer kept by the Paying Agent/Registrar acting
in the cap&city of registrar for the Certificates, 4,on the
terms and conditions set forth is, the Certificate Ordnance,
Among other requirements for such transfer, this Certificate
must be presented and surrendered to the Paying Agent/Registrar
for cancellation, together with prcper instruments of assign-
meet, in form and with guarantee of signatures satisfactory to I
the Paying Agent/Registrar, evidencing assignment by the
initial registered owner of this Certificate, or any portion or
portions hereof in any integral multiple of $5,000, to the
assignee or assignees in whose name or names this Certificate
or any such portion or portions hereof is or are to be trans-
ferred and registered. Any instrument or instruments of
assignment satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar may be
e''} used to evidence the assignment of this Certificate or any such
portion or portions hereof by the initial registered owner
hereof. A new certificate or certificates payable to such
assignee or assignees (which then will be the new registered
owner: or owners of such new Certificate or Certificates) or to
the initial registered owner as to any portion cate which is not being assigned and transferred fbyhtheCinitial
registered owner, shall be delivered by the Paying Agent/Regis-
trar in conversion of and exchange for this Certificate or any
portion or portions hereof, but solely in the form and manner
as provided in the next paragraph hereof for the conversion and
exchange of this Certificate or any portion hereof. The
tigistered owner of this Certificate shall be deemed and
treated by the Issuer and.the Paying Agent/Registrar as the
absolute owner hereof for all purposes, including payment and
discharge of liability upon this Certificate to the extent of
such payment, and the Issuer and the Paying Agent/Registrar
shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary,
I A9 PROVIDED above and in the Certificate Ordinance, this
Certificate, to the extent of the unpaid principal balance
hereof, may be converted into and exchanged for a like aggre-
gate principal amount of fully registered certificates, without
interest coupons, payable to the assignee or assignees duly
designated in writing by the initial registered owner hereof,
or to the initial registered owner as to any portion of this
a
.I
I
J
1
Certificate which is not being assigned and transferred by the
initial registered owner, in any denomination or denominations
in any integral multiple of $5,000 lv-'bject to the requirement
hereinafter stated that each substitute certificate issued in
F exchange for any portion of this Certificate shall have a
single stated principal maturity date), upon surrender of thir
Certificate to the Paying Agent/Registrar ibr cancellation, all
in accordance with the form and procedures set forth in the
Certificate Ordinance. If this Certificate or any portion
hereof is assigned and transferred or converted each certifi-
cate issued in exchange for any portion hereof shall have a
single stated principal maturity date corresponding to the due
date of the installment of principal of this Certificate or
portion hereof for which the substitute certificate is being
exchanged, and shall bear interest at the rate applicable to
and borne by such installment of principal or portion thereof.
No such certificate shall be payable in installments, but shall
have only one stated principal maturity date, AS PROVIDED IN
THE CERTIFICATE ORDLNANCE, THIS CERTIFICATE IN ITS PRESENT FORM
MAY BE ASSIGNED AND TRANSFERRED OR CONVERTED ONCE ONLY, and to
one or more assignses, but the certificates issued and de-
livered in exchange for this Certificate or any portion hereof
may be assigned and transferred, and converted, subsequently,
as provided in the Certificate Ordinance. The Issuer shall pay
the Paying Agent/Registrar's standard or customary fees and
charges for transferring, converting, and exchanging this
Certificate or any portion thereof, but the one requesting such
transfer, conversion, and exchange shall pay any taxes or
governmental charges required to be paid with respect thereto.
The Paying Agent/Registrar shall not be required to make any
such assignment, conversion, or exchange during the period
commencing with the close of business on any Record Date and
ending with the opening of business on the next following
principal or interest payment data,
{ IN THE EVENT any Paying Agent/Registrar for this Certifi-
cate is changed by the Issuer, resigns, or otherwise ceases to
act as such, the Issuer has covenanted in the Certificate
Ordinance that it promptly will appoint a competent and legally
qualified substitute therefor, and promptly will cause written
notice thereof to be mailed to the registered owner of this
Certificate.
IT 19 HEREBY certified, recited, and covenanted that this
Certificate has been duly and validly authorized, issued, and ;
6 I
I
deliveredl that all tsexi t,~iand be done precedent to or in
proper to be
the authorization, issuance, and delivery of this Certificate
have been performed, existed, and been done in accordance with
laws that this Certificate is a general obligation of the
issuer, issued on the full faith and credit the.•.,jff and that
annual.ad valorem taxes sufficient to provide for the payment
of the interest on and principal of this Certificate, as such
interest comes due and such principal matures, have been levied
and ordered to be levied against all taxable property in the
` Issuer, and have been pledged irrevocably for such paymer
i within the limit prescribed by laws and that this Certificate
additionally, is payable from and secured by ~certaindsurplusby
revenues (not to exceed $10,000 in aggregate
the Issuer from the ownership and operation of the City's
Utility system (consisting of the City's combined waterworks I
y system, sanitary sewer system, and electric light and power
system), all as provided in the Certificate Ordinance.
THE ISSUER has reserved the right to issue, in accordance
with law, and in accordance with the Cert ainto Or
contract
other and additional obligations, and to enter
and/or revenues of the City's
taxes
payable from ad valorem
Utility System, on a parity with, or with respect to said
revenues, superior in lien to, this Certificate.
'
BY BECOMING the registered owner of this Certificate, the
registered owner thereby acknowledges all of the terms etnd
provisions of the Certificate Ordinance, agrees to be bound by
such terms and provisions, acknowledges that the Certificate
Ordinance is duly recorded and available for inspection in the
official minutes and records of the governing body of tte
Issuer, and agreea that the terms and provisions of thin
Cecthe constitte a contract
between
'IN WITNESS 'AMREOF, the Issuer has caused this Certificate
to be signed with the manual signature of the Mayor of tho
Issuer and countersigned with the manual signature of the City
Secretary of the Lauer, has caused the official seal of the
} Issuer to be duly impressed on this Certificate, and has caused )
this Certificate to be dated JUNE 1, 1987.
-
G{ty ecratary► Mayor,
City of Denton, z,xa•
City of Denton, Texas y
1 (CITY SEAL)
7
r.
FORM OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE
COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS:
f COMPTROLLER'S REGISTRATION CERTIFICATES REGISTER NO.
}
j I hereby certify that this Certificate has been examined,
kk certified as to validity, and approved by the Attorney General
of the State of Texas, and that this Certificate has been
registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State
of Texas.
Witness my signature and seal this
i
Comptroller o Public Accounts
of the State of Texas
(COMPTROLLER'S SEAL) 1
Section 6. ADDITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CERTIFI-
{ CATES. Registration and Transfer. (a) The issuer shall keep
or cause to be kept at the ps na pal corporate trust office of
MBANX DALLAS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, DALLAS, TEXAS (the "Paying
Agent/Registrar") books or records of the registration and
transfer of the Certificates (the "Registration Books"), and
the Issuer hereby appoints the Paying Agent/Registrar as its
registrar and transfer agent to keep such books or records and
make such transfers and registrations under such reasonable
regulations as the Issuer and Paying Agent/Registrar may
prescribe] and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall make such
transfers and registrations as herein provided. The Paying
Agent/Registrar shall obtain and record in the Registration
Books the address of the registered owner of each Certificate
to which payments with respect to the Certificates shall be
mailed, as herein provided) but it shall be the duty of each
registered owner to notify the Paying Agent/Registrar in
writing of the address to which payments shall be mailed, and
i such interest payments shall not be mailed unless such notice
has been given. The issuer shall have the right to inspect the
Registration Books during regular business hours of the Paying
Agent/Registrar, but otherwise the Paying Agent/Registrar shall
keep the Registration Books confidential and, unless otherwise
required by law, shall not permit their inspection by any other
entity. Registration of each Certificate may be transferred in
{ the Registration. Books only upon presentation and surrender of
4 such Certificate to the Paying Agent/Registrar for transfer of
1 registration and cancellation, together with proper written
instruments of assignment, in form and with guarantee of
signatures satisfactory to the Paying Agent/ Registrar, (i)
B
I
l
evidencing the assignment of the Certificate, or any portion
thereof in any integral multiple of ;5,000, to the assignee or
assignees thereof, and 111) the right of such assignee or
assignees to have the Certificate or any such portion thereof
registered in the name of such assignee or assignees. Upon
the asaignment and transfer of any Certificate or any portion
thereof, a new substitute Certificate or Certificates shall be
I issued in conversion and exchange thert£or in the manner herein
provided. The Initial Certificate, to the -tent of the unpaid
principal balance thereof, may be assigned and transferred by
the initial registered owner thereof once only, and to one or
more assignees designated in writing by the initial registered
owner thereof. All Certificates issued and delivered in
conversion of and exchange for the initial Certificate shall be
in any denomination or denominations of any integral multiple
of $5,000 (subject to the requirement hereinafter stated that
each substitute Certificate shall have a single,stated priaci-
t pal maturity date), shall be in the form prescribed in the FORM
OF SUBSTITUTE CERTIFICATE set forth in this Ordinance, and
shall have the characteristics, and may be assigned, trans-
ferred, and converted as hereinafter provided. If the Initial
` Certificate or any portion thereof is assigned and transferred
or converted the Initial Certificate must be surrendered to the
Paying Agent/Registrar for cancellation, and each Certificate
issued in exchange for any portion of the initial Certificate
shall have a single stated principal maturity date, and shall
not be payable in installmentst and each such Certificate shall
have a principal maturity date corresponding to the due date of
the installment of principal or portion thereof for which the
substitute Certificate is being exchanged) and each such
"f Certificate shall bear interest at the single rate applicable
to and borne by such installment of principal or portion
thereof for which it is being exchanged. If only a portion of
the initial Certificate is assigned and transferred, there
shall be delivered to and registered in the name of the initial
registered owner substitute Certificates in exchange for the
unassigned balance of the Initial Certificate in the same
manner as if the initial registered owner were the assignee
thereof. If any Certificate or portion thereof other than the
Initial Certificate is assigned and transferred or converted
each Certificate issued in exchange therefor shall have the
same principal maturity date and bear interest at the same rate
II as the Certificate for which it is exchanged. A form of
1 assignment shall be printed or endorsed on each Certificate,
excepting the Initial Certificate, which shall be executed by
i the registered owner or its duly authorized attorney or repre-
sentative to evidence an assignment thereof. Upon surrender of
any Certificates or any portion or portions thereof for trans-
fer of registration, an authorized representative of the Paying
Agent/Registrar shall make such transfer in the Registration f
i
i d
9
Books, and shall deliver a new fully registered substitute
Certificate or Certificates, having the characteristics herein
described, payable to such assignee or assignees (which then
will be the registered owner or owners of such new Certificate
or Certificates), or to the previous registered owner in case
only a portion of a Certificate is being assigned and trans-
ferred, all in conversion of and exchange for said assigned
Certificate or Certificates or any portion or portions thereof,
in the same form and manner, and with tha same effect, as
E? provided in Section 6(d), below, for the conversion and ex-
change of Certificates by any registered owner of a Certifi-
cate. The Issuer shall pay the Paying Agent/Registrar's
standard or customary fees and charges for making such transfer
and delivery of a substitute Certificate or Certificates, but
the one requesting such transfer shall pay any taxes or other
governmental charges required to be paid with respect thereto.
The Paying Agent/Registrar shall not be required to make
transfers of registration of any Certificate or any portion
thereof during the period commencing with the close of business
on any Record Date and ending with the opening of business on
the next following principal or interest payment date.
(b) Ownershi of Certificates. The entity in whose name
any Certificate shall a registered in the Registration Books
at any time shall be deemed and treated as the absolute owner
thereof for all purposes of this Ordinance, whether or not such
Certificate shall be overdue, and the Issuer and the Paying
Agent/Registrar shall not be affected by any notice to the
contraryl and payment of, or on account of, the principal of,
premium, if any, and interest on any such Certificate shall be
made only to such registered owner. All such payments shall be
valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon
such Certificate to the extent of the sum or sums so paid.
(c) Payment of Certificates and Interest. The Issuer
hereby fur- er appo nts the Paying Agent Reg strar to act as
the paying agent for paying the principal of and interest on
the Certificates, and to act as its agent to convert and
exchange or replace Certificates, all as provided in this
Ordinance. The Paying Agent/Registrar shall keep proper
records of all payments made by the Issuer and the Paying
Agent/Registrar with respect to the Certificates, and of all
conversions and exchanges of Certificates, and all replacements
of Certificates, as provided in this Ordinance.
(d) Conversion and exchan a or Re lacement Authenti-
cation. Each Certificate slivered pursuant to this
!
3
1
{
10
Ordinance, to the extent of the unpaid principal balance or
principal amount thereof, may, upon surrender of such Cor.ifi-
cate at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying
Agent/ Registrar. together with a written request therefor duly
executed by the registered owner or the assignee or assignees
thereof, or its or their duly authorized attorneys or represen-
tatives, with guarantee of signatures satisfactory to the
Paying Agent/Registrar, may, at the option of the registered
owner or such assignee or assignees, as appropriate, be con-
vented into and exchanged for fully registered certificates,
withov: interest coupons, in the form prescribed in the FOP14 OF
SUBSTITUTE CERTIFICATE sat forth in this Ordinance, in the
denomination of ¢5,000, or any integral multiple of $5,000
i Isubjoct to the requirement hereinafter stated that each
substitute Certificate shall have a single stated maturity s
date), as requested in writing by such registered owner or such
assignee or assignees, in an aggregate principal amount equal f
to the unpaid principal balance or principal amount of any
Certificate or Certificates so surrendered, and payable to the
appropriate registered owner, assignee, or assignees, as the
case may be. If the Initial Certificate is assigned and
transferred or converted each substitute Certificate issued in 111
exchange for any portion of the initial Certificate shall have
a single stated principal maturity date, and shall not be
payable in installments) and each such Certificate shall have a
principal maturity date corresponding to the due date of the
installment of principal or portion thereof for which the
substitute Certificate is being exchanged; and each such .
Certificate shall bear interest at the single rate applicable
to and borne
by such installment of principal or portion
thereof for which it is being exchanged. If any Certificate or
portion thereof (other than the Initial Certificate) is as-
signed and transferred or converted, each Certificate issued in
exchange therefor shall have the same principal maturity date
and bear interest at the same rate as the Certificate for which
it is being exchanged. Each substitute Certificate shall bear
a letter and/or number to distinguish it from each other
Certificate. The Paying Agent/Registrar shall convert and
exchange or replace Certificates as provided herein, and each
fully registered certificate delivered in conversion of and
exchange for or replacement of any Certificate or portion
thereof as permitted or required by any provision of this
Ordinance shall constitute one of the Certificates for all
purposes of this Ordinance, and may again be converted and
exchanged or replaced. it is specifically provided that any
Certificate authenticated in conversion of and exchange for or
replacement of another Certificate on or prior to the first
scheduled Record Date for the Initial Certificate shall bear
interest from the date of the Initial Certificate, but each
substitute Certificate so authenticated after such first
11 i
J
scheduled Record Date shall bear interest from the interest
payment dat-1 Next preceding the date on which such substitute
Certificate was so authenticated, unless such Certificate is
authenticated after any Record Date but on or before the next
following interest payment date, in which case it shall bear
interest from such next following interest payment datel
provided, however, that if at the time of delivery of any
substitute Certificate the interest on the Certificate for
which it is being exchanged is dub but has not been paid, then
such Certificate shall bear interest from the date to which
such interest has been paid in full. THE INITIAL CERTIFICATE
issued cnd delivered pursuant to this Ordinance is not required
to be, and shall not be, authenticated by the Paying Agent/-
` Registrar, but on each substitute Certificate issued in conver-
I sion of and exchange for or replacement of any Certificate or !
Certificates issued under this Ordinance there shall be printed
a certificate, in the form substantially as followso
I "PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR'S AUTHEA:'1CATION CERTIFICATE
It is hereby certified that this Certificate has been
issued under the provisions of the Certificate Ordinance
described on the face of this Certificate; and that this
Certificate has been issued in conversion of aml exchange for
or replacement of a certificate, certificates, or a portion of
a certificate or certificates of en issue which originally was
approved by the Attorney General of the State of Texas and
registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State
of Texas.
MBANX DALLAS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
DALLAS, TEXAS
Paying Agent/Registrar
Dated By
Authorized Representat ve
An authorized representative of the Paying Agent/Registrar
shall, before the delivery of any such Certificate, date and
manually sign the above Certificate, and no such Certificate
shall be deemed to be issued or outstanding unless such Certif-
icate is so executed. The Paying Agent/Registrar promptly
shall cancel all Certificates surrendered for conversion and
exchange or replacement. No additional ordinances; orders, or
resolutions heed be passed or adopted by the governing body of
the Issuer or any other body or person so as to accomplish the
foregoing conversion and exchange or replacement of any Certif-
icate or portion thereof, and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall
provide for the printing, execution, and delivery of the
substitute Certificates in the manner prescribed herein, and
t
12 {
I
said Certificates shall be of type composition printed on paper
with lithographed or steel engraved borders of customary weight
and strength. Pursuant to Vernon's Ann. Tex. Civ. St. Art.
717k-6, and particularly Section 6 thereof, the duty of conver-
sion and excha^ge or replacement of Certificates as aforesaid
is hereby imposed upon the Paying Agent/Registrar., and, upon
the execution of the above Paying Agent/Registrar's Authentica-
tion Certificate, the converted and exchanged or replaced
Certificate shall be valid, incontestable, and enforceable in
the same manner rnd with the same effect as the Initial Certif-
icate which originally was issued pursuant to this Ordinance,
approved by the Attorney General, and registered by the
Comptroller of Public Accounts. The Zssuer shall pay the
Paying Agent/Registrar's standard c: customary fees and charges
for transferring, converting, and exchanging any Certiiicate or
any portion thereof, but the one requesting any such transfer,
conversion, and exchange shall pay any taxes or governmental
E charges required to be paid with respect thereto as a condition
precedent to the exercise of such privilege of conversion and
exchange. The Paying Ageitt/Registrar shall not be required to
make any such conversion and exchange or replacement of Certif-
icates or any portion thereof (i) during the period commencing
with the close of business on any Record Date and ending with
the opening of business on the next following principal or
interest payment date, or, (ii) with respect to any Certificate
or portion tiiereof called for redemption prior to maturity,
within 45 days prior to its redemption date.
(e) In General. All Certificatee issued in conversion
and sxchr.nge o+ r renfacemont of any other Certificate or portion
thereof, (i) shall be issued in fully registered form, without
interest coupons, with the principal of and interest on such
Certificates to be payable only to the registered owners
thereof, (it) may be transferred and assigned, (iii) may be
converted and ",:hanged for other Certificates, (iv) shall have
the characteristics, (v) shall be signed and sealed, and (vi)
the principal of and interest on the Certificates shall be pay- ;
able, all as provided, and in the manner required or indicated,
in the FORM OF SUBSTITUTE CERTIFICATE set forth in this Ordi-
nance. ,
{
(f) Pa ent of Fees and Charges. The issuer he:sby
covenants w o the re-elis`terod owners of the Certificates that
it will (i) pay the standard or customary fees and charges of
the Paying Agent/Registrar for !.to services with respect to the
payment of the principal of and interest on the Certificates,
when due, and (ii) pay the fees and charges of the Paying
Agent/Registrar for services with respect to the transfer of
registration of Certificates, and with respect to the
13
conversion and exchange of Certificates solely to the extent
above provided in this ordinance.
(g) Substitute Pa in A ent/Re istrar. The Issuer
covenants w t the reg stered owners of the Certificates that
at all times while the Certificates are outstanding the Issuer
will provide a competent and legally qualified bank, trust
company, financial institution, or other agency to act as and
perform the services of Paying Agent/Registrar for the Certifi-
cates under this Ordinance, and that the Paying Agent/Registrar
will be one entity. The Issuer reserves the right to, and may,
at its option, change the Paying Agent/Registrar upon not less
than 120 days written notice to the Paying Agent/Registrar, to
be effective not later than 60 days prior to the next principal
or interest payment date after such notice. In the event that
the Qntity at any time acting as Paying Agent/Registrar (or its
successor by merger, acquisition, or other method) should
resign or otherwise cease to act as such, the Issuer covenants
that promptly it will appoint a competent and legally qualified
bank, trust company, financial institution, or other agency to
act as Paying Agent/Registrar under this Ordinance. Upon any
change in the Paying Agent/Registrar, the previous Paying
Agont/Registrar promptly shall transfer and deliver the Regis-
tra,:ion Books (or a copy thereof), along with all other perti-
nent books and records relating to the Certificates, to the new
i Paying Agent/Registrar designated and appointed by the Issuer.
Upon any change in the Paying Agent /Registrar, the .Issuer
promptly will cause a written notice thereof to be sent by the
new Paying Agent/Registrar to each registered owner of the
Certificates, by United States mail, first-class postage
prepaid, which notice also shall give the address of the new
Paying Agent/Registrar. By accepting the position and perform-
ing as such, each Paying Agent/Registrar shall be deemed to
have agreed to the provisions of this Ordirance, and a cer-
tified copy of this Ordinance shall be delivered to each Paying
Agent/Registrar.
Section 7. FORM OF SUBSTITUTE CERTIFICATES. The form of
all Certificates issued in conversion and exchange or replace-
went of any other Certificate or portion thereof, including the
forat of Paying Agent/Registrar's Certificate to be printed on
each of such Certificates, and the Form of Assignment to be
j printed on each of the Certificates, shall be, respectively,
substantially as follows, with such appropriate variations,
1 omissions, or insertions as are permitted or required by this
Ordinance.
14
C
FORM OF SUBSTITUTE CERTIFICATE
NO. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
STATE OF TEXAS Z
COUNTY OF DENTON
CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATION
SERIES 1987-A
INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE CUSIP NO.
1
ON THE MATURITY DATE specified above the CITY OF DENTON,
j in Denton County, Texas (the "Issuer"), being a a political
subdivision of the State of Texas, h6reby promises to pay to
or to We-registered assignee hereof (either being hereinafter'
called the "registered owner") the principal amount of
and to pay interest thereon from JUNE 1, 1987, to the maturity
date specified above, at the interest rate per annum specified
'above; with interest being payable on JANUARY 1, 1988, and
semiannually on each JULY 1 and JANUARY I thereafter, except
that if the date of authentication of this Certificate is later
than DECEMBER 15, 1987, such principal amount shall bear
interest from the interest payment date next preceding tho date
of authentication, unless such date of authentication is after
any Record Date (hereinafter defined) but on or before the next
followii:7 interest payment date, in which case such principal
amount shall bear interest from such next following interest
payment date. i
THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON this Certificate are l
payable in lawful money of the United States of America,
without exchange or collection charges. The principal of this
Certificate shall be paid to the registered owner hereof upon
presentation and surrender of this Certificate at maturity, at
the principal corporate trust office of MBANR DALLAS, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, DALLAS, TEXAS, which !.6 the "Paying Agent/Regis-
trar" for this Certificate. The payment of interest on this
Certificate shall be made by the Paying Agent/Registrar to the
registered owner hereof on each interest payment data by check
dated as of such interest payment date, drawn by the Pa; inq
Agent/Registrar on, and payable solely from, funds of the
Issuer required by the ordinance authorizing the issuance of
the Certificates (the "Certificate Ordinance") to be on deposit
with the Paying Agent/Registrar for such purpose as hereinafter
proviledl and such check shall be sent by the Paying Agent/-
a
e
15 {
I
Registrar by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid,
on each such interest payment date, to the registered owner
hereof, at the address of the registered owner, as it appeared
on the 15th day of the month next preceding each such date (the
"Record Date") on the Registration Books kept by the Paying
Agent/Registrar, as hereinafter described. The Issuer cove-
nants with the registered owner of this Certificate that on or
before each principal payment date, interest payment date, and
accrued interest payment date for this Certificate it will make
available to the Paying Agent/Registrar, from the "Interest and
Sinking Fund" created by the Certificate Ordinance, the amounts
j required to provide for the payment, in immediately available
!1 funds, of all principal of and interest on the Certificates,
I~ when due.
IF THE DATE for the payment of the principal of or inter-
oat on this Certificate shall be a Saturday, Sunday, a legal
holiday, or a day on which banking institutions in the City
where the Paying Agent/Registrar is located are authorized by
law or executive order to close, then the date for such payment
shall be the next succeeding day which is not such a Saturday, j~
Sunday, legal holiday, or day on which banking institutions are
authorized to close; and payment on such date shall have the `
same force and effect as if made on the original date payment
was due.
THIS CERTIFICATE is one of an issue of Certificates
initially dated JUNE 1, 1987, authorized in accordance with the
Constitution and laws of the State of Texas in the principal
amount of ;1,100,000, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING ALL OR A r
PORTION OF THE CITY'S CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS TO BE INCURRED 4
PURSUANT TO CONTRACTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIP.
KENT CONSTITUTING A MUNICIPAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, AND
PAYING ALL OR A PORTION OF THE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OF ENGINEERING, ATTORNEYS, AND FINANCIAL
ADVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH MUNICIPAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEM AND CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION. f
THIS CERTIFICATE OR ANY PORTION OR PORTIONS HEREOF IN ANY
INTEGRAL MULTIPLE OF $5,000 may be assigned and shall be trans-
ferred only in the Registration Books of the Issuer kept by the I
Paying Agent/Registrar acting in the capacity of registrar for
the Certificates, upon the terms and conditions set forth in
i the Certificate Ordinance. Among other requirements for such
assignment and transfer, this Certificate must be presented and
surrendered to the Paying Agent/Registrar, together with proper
instruments of assignment, in form and with guarantee of
signatures satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar, evidenc-
ing assignment of this Certificate or any portion or portions
hereof in any integral multiple of $5,000 to the assignee or
}
16
Registrar by United States mail, first-class postage prepaid,
on each such interest payment date, to the registered owner
hereof, at the addre,is of the registered owner, as it appeared
on the 15th day of the month next preceding each such date (the
"Record Date") on the Registration Books kept by the Paying
Agent/Registrar, as hereinafter described. The Issuer cove-
nants with the registered owner of this Certificate that on or
before each principal payment date, interest payment date, and
accrued interest payment date for this Certificate it will make
available to the Paying Agent/Registrar, from the 'Interest and
Sinking Fund' created by the Certificate ordinance, the amounts
required to provide for the payment, in immediately available
funds, of all principal of and interest on the Certificates,
when due.
IF THE DATE for the payment of the principal of or inter-
est on this Certificate shall be a Saturday, Sunday, a legal
holiday, or a day on which banking institutions in the City
where the Paying Agent/Registrar is located are authorized by
law or executive order to close, then the date for such payment
shall be the next succeeding day whir.h is not such a Saturday,
Sunday, legal holiday, or day on which banking institutions are
authorized to closet and payment on such date shall have the
same force and effect as if made on the original date payment
was due.
THIS CERTIFICATE is one of an issue of Certificates t
initially dated JUNE It 1987, authorized in accordance with the
Constitution and laws of the State of Texas in the principal
amount of ;1,100,000, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING ALL OR A
PORTION OF THE CITY'S CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS TO BE INCURRED
PURSUANT TO CONTRACTS FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIP-
MENT CONSTITUTING A MUNICIPAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, AND
PAYING ALL OR A PORTION OF THE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OF ENGINEERING, ATTORNEYS, AND FINANCIAL
ADVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH MUNICIPAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEM AND CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION.
THIS CERTIFICATE OR ANY PORTION OR PORTIONS HEREOF IN ANY
INTEGRAL MULTIPLE OF $5,000 may be assigned and shall be trans-
ferred only in the Registration Books of the Issuer kept by the
1 Paying Agent/Registrar acting in the capacity of registrar for
the Certificates, upon the terms and conditions set forth in
the Certificate Ordinance. Among other requirements, for such
assignment and transfer, this Certificate must be presented and
surrendered to the Paying Agent/Registrar, together with proper
instruments of assignment, in form and with guarantee of
signatures satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar, evidenc-
ing assignment of this Certificate or any portion or portions
hereof in any integral multiple of $5,000 to the assignee or
L
16
r
assignees in whose name or names this Certificate or any such
portion or portions hereof is or are to be transferred and
registered. The form of Assignment printed or endorsed on this
Certificate shall be executed by the registered owner or its
duly authorized attorney or representative, to evidence the
assignment hereof. A new Certificate or Certificates payable
to such assignee or assignees (which then will be the new
registered owner or owners of such new Certificate or Certifi-
cates), or to the previous registered owner in the case of the
assignment and transfer of only a portion of this Certificate,
E may be delivered by the Paying Agent/Registrar in conversion of
and exchange for this Certificate, all in the fo:•m and manner
I as provided in the next paragraph hereof for tho conversion and
exchange of other Certificates. The Issuer shall pay the
Paying Agent/Registrar's standard or customary fees and charges
for making such transfer, but the one requesting such transfer
shall pay any taxes or other govern;Lental charges required to
be paid with respect thereto. The Paying Agent/Registrar shall
not be required to make transfers of registration of this
Certificate or any portion hereof during the period commencing
with the close of business a. any Record Date and ending with
the opening of business on the next following principal or
interest payment date. The registered owner of this Certifi-
cate shall be deemed and treated by the Issuer and the Paying
Agent/Registrar as the absolute owner hereof for all purposes,
including payment and discharge of liability upon this Certifi-
cate to the ox: ent of such payment, and the Issuer and the
{ Paying Agent/Registrar shall not be affected by any notice to
the contrary. I
III
ALL CERTIFICATES OF THIS SERIES are issuable solely as
fully registered certificates, without interest coupons, in the
denomination of any integral multiple of $5,000. As provided
in the Certificate Ordinance, this Certificate, may, at the
j request of the registered owner or the assignee or assignees
I hereof, be converted into and exchanged for a like aggregate
1 principal amount of fully registered certificates, without
interest coupons, payable to the appropriate registered owner,
assignee, or assignees, as the case may be, having the same
maturity date, and bearing interest at the same rate, in any
denomination or denominations in any integral multiple of
$50000 as requested in writing by the appropriate registered
owner, assignee, or assignees, as the case may be, upon sur-
render of this Certificate to the Paying Agent/Registrar for
cancellation, all in accordance with the form and procedures
set forth in the Certificate Ordinance. The Issuer shall pay
the Paying Agent/Registrar's standard or customary fees and
charges for transferring, converting, and exchanging any
Certificate or any portion thereof, but the one requesting such
transfer, conversion, and exchange shall pay any taxes or
t
i 17
{
I
go'm+elrequired to be paid with respect thereto
asconent to the exercise of such privilege of
corsige. The Paying Agent/Registrar shall not
bequiny such conversion and exchange during the
a04ct the close of business on any Record Date
ening of business on the next following
pr-ipa payment date.
1 casIN I Paying Agent/Registrar for the Certifi- I
Is Issuer, resigns, or otherwise ceases to
ac'is suer has covenanted in the Certificate 1
' OrLInceiptly will appoint a competent and legally
qu herefor, and promptly will cause written
noi3 thmailed to the registered owners of the
CertEict'
CertE ctified, recited, and covenanted that this
delis , my and validly authorized, issued, and
i props too conditions, and things required or
the exist, and be done precedent to or in
have uance, and delivery of this Certificate
Y laws xieted, and been done in accordance with
iasu s icate is a general obligation of the
nnnu full faith and credit thereof1 and that
of t t s sufficient to provide for the a
irate c principal of this Certificate, as suent
ch
and! a such principal matures, have been levied
Issu n ed against all taxable property in the
witl~le pledged irrevocably for such payment,
and,cth ribed by lawj and that this Certificate,
pay ro bates of this Series, additionally are
pay Z pied by certain surplus revenues
t
exc helreht~=ation amount) derived by the Issuer tfrom
(hers , f the city s Utility System
co,119ly s combined waterworks system, sanitary
prd ,t stric light and power system), all as
~icate Ordinance.
~ I33tT ;
~srved the right to issue, in accordance
wi, and
rdanc* with the Certificate Ordinance,
j U~frd~bligations, and to enter into contracts,
!m taxe's and/or revenues of the City's
r, s p liento w this or pact to said
19ECOMile i ,
! r}ed o ~bq stared owner of this Certificate, the
ificats Ordinance, agrees to be bound
t*M4111nutirecords s of Y aoknowledges all of the terms and
a ndtona, acknowledges that the Certificate
S by
durded and available for inspection in the
of the governing body of the
~ 18
i
Issuer, and agrees that the terms and provisions of this
Certificate and the Certificate Ordinance constitute a contract
between each registered owner hereof and the Issuer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer has caused this Certificate
to be signed with the facsimile signature of the Mayor of the
Issuer and countersigned with the facsimile signature of the
City Secretary of the Issuer, and has caused the official seal
of the Issuer to be duly impressed, or placed in facsimile, on
this Certificate.
(facsimile signature) (facsimile signature)
C ty Secretary, Mayor,
City of Denton, Texas City of Denton, Texas
(CITY SEAL)
FORM OF PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR'S AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE
f PAYING AGENT/REGIST'RAR'S AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATE
r
It is hereby certified that this Certificate has been
issued under the provisions of the Certificate Ordinance
described on the face of this Certificate] and that this
Certificate has been issued in conversion of and exchange for
or replacement of a certificate, certificates, or a portion of
1 a certificate or certificates of an issue which originally was
approved by the Attorney General of the State of Texas and
1 registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State
of Texas.
r .t
MBANR DALLAS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
DALLAS, TEXAS
Paying Agent/Registrar
u c:
Dated By
Authorized RepresentaEive
a:
FORM OF ASSIGNNENTi
ASSIGNMENT
r FOR VALUE RECEIVZD, the undersigned registered owner of
this Certificate, or iuly authorized representative or attorney
thereof, hereby assigns this Certificate to
Ft
e ss gnee s ocTaT- Tp`rinL ~r typewrite Assignee's name an
Security or Taxpayer address, including zip code)
s w Identification Number)
1 Y`
y~.
Y
k
19
r
and ore y nevi^.a ly constitutes and appo nts
attorney to transfer the reg strat o.; o th s Certif sate on
the Paying Agent/Registrar's Registration Books with full power
of substitution in the premises.
Dated.
Signature Guaranteedt
NOTICE: This s gnature must be Registered Owner
guaranteed by a member of the NOTIM This signature must
New York Stock Exchange or a correspond with the name of
commercial bank or trust the ongtheeface ofe this pCer-
company. tificate.
Section S. TAX LEVY. A special Interest and Sinking Fund
(the "Interest and Sinking Fund") is hereby created solely for
the benefit of the Certificates, and the Interest and Sinking
fx Fund shall be established and maintained by the issuer at an
official depository bank of the issuer. The Interest r.nd l
Sinking Fund shall be kept separate and apart from all other
funds and accounts of the issuer, and shall be used caly for
paying the interest on and principal of the Certificates. All
ad valorem taxes levied and collected for and on account of the
Certificates shall be deposited, as collected, to the credit of
the Interest and Sinking Fund. During each year while any of
the Certificates or interest thereon are outstanding and
unpaid, the governing body of the Issuer shall compute and
ascertain a rate and amount of ad valorem tax which will be
sufficient to raise and produce the money required to pay the
and
interest on the Certificates as such interest becomes due,
a i to provide and maintain a sinkin-1 fund adequate to pay the
principal of its Certificates as such principal matures (but
never less than 21 of the original principal amount of the
44 Certificates as a sinking fund each year)l and said tax shall
be based on the latest approved tax rolls of the Issuer, with
full allowance being made for tax delinquencies and the cost of
tax collection. Said rate and amount of ad valorem tax is
hereby ievieds and is hereby ordered to be levied, against all
taxable property in the Issuer for each year while any of the
Certificates or interest thereon are outstanding and unpaid)
and said t assessed a collected depositedto he o edit of the aforesaid interest and Sinkingd
s
20
Fund. Said ad valorem taxes sufficient to provide for the
payment of the interest on and principal of the Certificates,
as such interest comes due and such principal matares, are
hereby pledged for such payment, within the limit prescribed by
law.
Section 9. SURPLUS REVENUES. The Certificates addi-
tionally shall be payable from and secured by surplus revenues,
to the extent hereinafter permitted, derived by the Issuer from
the ownership and operation of the Issuer's Utility System
(consisting of its combined waterworks system, sanitary sewer
system, and electric light and power system) remaining after
(a) payment of all amounts constituting operation and main-
tenance expenses of said Utility System, and (b) payment of all
debt service, reserve, and other requirements and amounts
required to be paid under all ordinances heretofore or here-
after authorizing (1) all bonds and (ii) all other obligations
not on a parity with the Certificates, which are payable from
and secured by any Utility System revenues, and (c) payment of
all amounts payable from any Utility System revenues pursuant
to contracts heretofore or hereafter entered into by the Issuer
in accordance with law (the "Surplus Revenues"). If, for any
reason, the Issuer fails to deposit ad valorem taxes levied
pursuant to Section 8 hereof to the credit of the Interest and
Sinking Fund in an amount sufficient to pay, when due, the
principal of and interest on the Certificates, then Surplus
Revenues, to the extent hereinafter permitted, shall be depos-
ited to the credit of the Interest and Sinking Fund and used to
pay such principal and/or interest. A mtximum aggregate of
$10,000 of Lurplus Revenues may be used to pay principal and/or
interest on the Certificates and any obligations on a parity
therewith. The Certificates and any obligations on a parity
therewith are not, and shall not be deemed to be, payable from
or secured ty any Surplus Revenues in excess of an aggregate of j
$10,000. Until and unless an aggregate of $10,000 of Surplus
Revenues actually is used to pay any such principal and/or
interest, additional obligations, payable from and secured by
all or any remaining unused part of said aggregate of ;10,000 ii
of Surplus Revenues, may be issued by the Issuer on a parity
j with the Certificates and any other then outstanding parity
obligations, with the Certificates and all such additional
parity obligations to be payable from and secured equally and
ratably by all or any remaining unused part of said aggregate.
The Issuer reserves, and shall have, the right to issue bonds,
j and other obligations not on a parity with the Certificates,
i and to enter into contracts, in accordance with applicable
i laws, to be payable from and secured by any Utility System
revenues other than the aggregate of $10,000 of Surplus Reve-
nues as described above. ii
1
21
i
Section 10. DEFEASANCE OF CERTIFICATES. (a) Any Certif-
icate and thn interest thereon shall be deemed to be paid,
retired, and no longer outstanding (a "Defeased Certificate")
within the meaning of this Ordinance, except to the extent
provided in subsection (d) of this Section, when payment of the
I principal of such Certificate, plus interest thereon to the due
date either (i) shall have been made or caused to be made in
accordance with the terms thereof, or (ii) shall have been
provided for on or before such due date by irrevocably deposit-
ing with or making available to the Paying Agent/Registrar for
such payment (1) lawful money of the United States of America
sufficient to make such payment or (2) Government obligations
which mature as to principal and interest in such amounts and
at such times as will insure the availability, without rein-
vestment, of sufficient money to provide for such payment, and
when proper arrangements have been mr.de by the Issuer with the
Paying Agent/Registrar for the payment of its services until
all Defeased Certificates shall have become due and payable. E
At such time as a Certificate shall be deemed to be a Defeased
Certificate hereunder, as aforesaid, such Certificate and the
interest thereon shall no longer be secured by, payable from,
or entitled to the bene.its of., the ad valorem taxes herein
levied and pledged as provided in this ordinance, and such
principal a'ad interest shall be payable solely from such money
„i or Government Obligations.
(b) Any moneys so deposited with the Paying Agent/Regis-
trar may at the written direction of the Issuer also be in-
vested in Government Obligations, maturing in the amounts and
times as hereinbefore set forth, and all income from such
Government Obligations received by the Paying Agent/Registrar
which is not required for the payment of the Certificates and
interest thereon, with respect to which such money has been so
deposited, shall be turned over to the Issuer, or deposited as
directed in writing oy the Issuer,
(c) The term "Government Obligations* as used in this
Section shall mean direct obligations of the United States of
America, inoluding obligations the principal of and interest on
which are unconditionally guaranteed by the United States of
America, which may be United States Treasury obligations such
as its State and Local Government Series, which may be in
book-entry form,
(d) Until all Defeased Certificates shall have become due
'I and payable, the Paying Agent/Registrar shall perform the
1 services of Paying Agent/Registrar for such Defeased Certifi-
cates the same as if they had not been defeased, and the Issuer
r:
22
shall make proper arrangements to provide and pay for such
services as required by this Ordinance.
Section 11. DAMAGED, MUTILATED, LOST, STOLEN, OR DE-
STROYED CERTIFICATES. (a) Re2lacement Certificates. In the
event any outstanding Certificate is damaged, mutlated, lost,
stolen, or destroyed, the Paying Agent/Registrar shall cause to
be printed, executed, and delivered, a new certificate of the
same principal amount, maturity, and interest rate, as the
damaged, mutilated, lost, stolen, or destroyed Certificate, in
replacement for such Certificate in the manner hereinafter
a provided.
s
(b) Application for Re lacement Certificates. Applica-
tion for replacement o damaged, mut lated, lost, itolen, or
destroyed Certificates shall be made by the registered owner
thereof to the Paying Agent/Registrar. In every case of loss,
theft, or destruction of a Certificate, the registered owner
applying for a replacement certificate shall furnish to the {
Issuer and to the Paying Agent/Registrar such security or
indemnity as may be required by them to save each of them
j; harmless from any loss or damage with respect thereto. Also
in every case of loss, theft, or destruction of a Certificate,
the registered owner shall furnish to the issuer and the Paying
Agent/Registrar evidence to their satisfaction of the loss,
theft, or destruction of such Certificate, as the case may be.
In every case of damage or mutilation of a Certificate, the
registered owner shall surrender to the Paying Agent/Registrar
for cancellation the Certificate so damaged or mutilated.
(c) No Default Occurred. Notwithstanding the foregoing
provisions of t s Sect on, n the event of any such Certifi- 1
cats shall havo matured, and no default has occurred which is
then continuing in the payment of the principal of, or interest
on the Certificate, the Issuer may authorize the payment of the
same (without surrender thereof except in the case of a damaged
or mutilated Certificate) instead of issuing a replacement
Certificate, provided security or indemnity is furnished as
above provided in this Section.
(d) Char a for Iesuin Re lacement Certificates. Prior
to the issuance o any rep acement cart cite t e Paying
Agent/Registrar shall charge the registered owner of such
Certificate with all legal, printing, and other expenses in
connection therewith. Every replacement certificate issued
pursuant to the provisions of this Section by virtue of the
fact that any Certificate is lost, stolen, or destro ed shall
constitute a contractual obligation of the Issuer wl,ther or
not the lost, stolen, or destroyed Certificate shall be found
at any time, or be enforceable by anyone, and shall he entitled
1
2I
i
l
to all the benefits of this Ordinance equally and proportion-
ately with any and all other Certificates duly issued under
this Ordinance.
r (e)
Autharit for Issuin Re lacement Certificates. In
accordance w t Sect on 6 o Vernan s Ann. Tex. C Iv. St. Art.
717k-61 this Section of this Ordinance shall constitute author-
ity for the issuance of any such replacement certificate
without necessity of further action by the governing body of
i the Issuer or any other body or person, and the duty of the
i replacement of such certificates is hereby authorized and
imposed upon the Paying Agent/Registrar, and the Paying Agent/-
Registrar shall authenticate and deliver such Certificates in
the form and manner and with the effect, as provided in Section
6(d) of this Ordinance for Certificates issued in conversion
and exchange for other Certificates.
Section 12. CUSTODY, APPROVAL, AND REGISTRATION OF
CERTIFICATES; CERTIFICATE COUNSEL'S OPINION, AND CUSIP NUMBERS.
The Mayor of the Issuer is hereby authorized to have control of
the initial Certificate issued hereunder and r1l necessary
j records and proceedings pertaining to the Init,sl Certificate
pending its delivery and its investigation, examination, and f
approval by the Attorney General of the State of Texas, and its
registration by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State
j of Texas. Upon registration of the Initial Certificate said
Comptroller of Public Accounts (or a deputy designated in
writing to act for said Comptroller) shall manually sign the
Comptroller's Registration Certificate on the Initial Certifi-
cate, and the seal of said Comptroller shall be impressed, or
placed in facsimile, on the Initial Certificate. The approving
legal opinion of the Issuer's Bond Counsel and the assigned
CUSIP numbers may, at the option of the Issuer, be printed on
the Initial Certificate or on any Certificates issued and de-
livered in conversion of and exchange or replacement of any
Certificate, but neither shall have any legal effect, and shall
be solely for the convenience and information of the registered
owners of the Certificates.
Section 13. COVENANTS REGARDING TAX-EXEMPT 9TATU3 OF
CERTIFICATES. The ssuer ere y covenants to to a such act ion
( or re ran rom.such action necessary to ensure the status of
( the Certificates as obligations described in section 103 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or any predecessor thereof. In
particular, but not by way of limitation, the Issuer covenants
as followsl
(a) None of the proceeds of the Certificates (in-
eluding investment earnings thereon) or of the facilities
financed with the proceeds of the Certificates will be
1
2!
f
u
used, directly or indirectly, in the trade or business of
any person or entity other than the Issuer. For purposes
of the foregoing, any use of such proceeds or facilities
in any manner contrary to the guidelines set forth in
Revenue Procedures 82-14 and 82-15, 1982-1 C.B. 459, 460,
or any amendments, revisions or supplements thereto, shall
constitute the use of such proceeds or facilities. in the
trade or business of such person or entity;
(b) None of the proceeds of the Certificates (in-
cluding investment earnings thereon) will be used, direct-
ly or indirectly, to finance loans to any persons or other
entitiesl
(c) Not by way of limitation, the Issuer will take
such action or will refrain from any action which would
adversely affect the exemption from federal income taxa-
tion of the interest piA d on the Certificates, including
without limitation any action that would permit any of the
Certificates to be treated as "priva'e activity bonds"
1 within the meaning of section 141 of the Code, and will
take, or require to be taken, such acts as may be reason-
ably within its ability and as may from time to time be
required under applicable law or regulation to continue to
cause interest on the Certificates to be excludable from
gross income of the holder, including the preparation and
filing'of any statements or information reports required
to be filed by the Issuer in order to maintain the tax-
exempt status of the interest on the Certificatesf and
(d) The Issuer has not taken, has no present inten-
tion of taking any action and knows of no action taken or
intended which would cause interest on the Certificates to
be includable in the gross income of any cartificatehol-
dare for federal income tax purposes.
Section 14. COVENANTS REGARDING ARBITRAGE. (a) A Rebate
Fund is hereby esta e e by the Issuer. Such Fund shall be
for the sole benefit of the United States of America and shall
not be subject to the claim of any other person, including
without limitation the owners of the Certificates. The Rebate
r Fund is established for the purpose of compliance with section
148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code").
(b) At the close of each "Certificate Year," the Issuer
shall compute the amount of "Excess Earnings," if any, for the
period beginning on the date of de';.very of the Initial Certif-
icate and ending at the close of such "Certificate Year" and
transfer to the Rebate Fund an amount equal to the difference,
4 1, if any, between the amount then in the Rebate Fund and the
25
f
I
Excess Earnings so computed. The term "Certificate Year" means
with respect to the Certificates each one-year period ending on
the anniversary of tle date of delivery of the Initial Certifi-
cate. If, at the close of any Certificate Year, the an.cunt in
the Rebate Fund exceeds the amount that would be requires to ba
paid to the United States of America under paragraph (d) below
if the Certificates had been paid in full, such excess may be
transferred from the Rebate Fund and paid to the issuers to be
i used for such purposes for which, or to be redeposited to such
fund from which, such amounts were originally derived,
(c) In general, "Excess Earnings" for any period of time
means the sum of
(i) the excess of
(A) the aggregate amount earned during such
period of, time on all "Nonpurpose Obligations"
(includir,g gains on the disposition of such Obli-
gations) in which "Gross Proceeds" of the issue are
invested (other than amounts attributable to an
„ excess described in this subparagraph (c)(i)), over
i,
(B) the amount that would have been earned
during such period of time if the "Yield" on such
Nonpurpose obligations (other than amounts attrib-
utable to an excess described in this subparagraph
(c)li)) ha( been equal to the yield on the issue,
plus
`F (ii) any income during such period of time attrib-
utable to the excess deom ribed in subparagraph (c)(i)
above.
F M4 y
'Excess Earnings' will not include amounts, if any, which need
not be taken into account under the special rules of section
140(f) (4) (A) and (B) of the Code relating to bona fide debt
service :_nds and the six-month temporary investment period.
The terms "Kc%nputposs Obligations," "Gross Proceeds" and
"Yield" shall have the meanings prescribed by section 148 of
the Code and shall be applied in the manner prescribed in such
section.
(d) The Issuer shall pay to the United States of America
at least once every five-years an amount that ensures that at
Fr„ a least 90 percent of the Excess Earnings from the date of
delivery of the Certificates to the close of the period for
which the payment is being made will have been paid. The
Issuer shall pay to the United Staten of America not later than
60 days after the Certificates have been paid in full 100
t
26
percent of the amount then required to be paid under section
148(f) of the Code as a result of Excess Earnings.
(e) The Issuer shall keep such records as will enable the
Issuer to fulfill its responsibilities under this section and
section 148(f) of the Code and shall retain such records for at
least six years following the final payment of principal and
interest on the Certificates.
(f) The Issuer will not use any portion of the proceeds
of the Certificates directly or indirectly to acquire "higher
yielding investments," or to replace funds which were used
directly or indirectly to acquire ";iigher yielding invest-
menu The term higher yielding investments means any invest-
ment property (as defined in section 148(b)(2) of the Code)
which produces a yield over the term of the issue which is
materially higher than the yield on the issue (as defined
above). The foregoing limitation on higher yielding invest-
ments shall not apply to
(1) proceeds of the Certificates invested for a
reasonable temporary period of 3 years or less until such
proceeds are needed for the purpose for which the certificates are issued, or
(2) amounts invested in a bona fide debt service
fund if the gross earnings on such fund are less than
;100,000 in any certificate year.
(g) The Issuer covenants to restrict the use of Initial i
Certificate proceeds in such manner and to such extent, as may
be necessary, so that the Certificates will not constitute
arbitrage bonds under section 148 of the Code. Any authorized
representative of the Issuer having responsibility with respect
to the issuance of the Certificates is authorized and directed,
alone or in conjunction with any other official, employee or
consultant of the Issuer to giva an appropriate certificate on j
' behalf of the Issuer, for inclusion in the transcript of I
proceedings for the Certificates, setting forth the facts, i
estimates and circumstances and reasonable expectations per-
taining to section 148 of the Code and, to the extent appli-
cable, section 149(d) of the Code.
(h) The requirements of this Section are subject to, and
shall be interpreted in accordance with section 148 of the
code.
Section 15. SALE OF INITIAL CERTIFICATE. The Initial
Certifica..e is hereby sold and shall be delivered to
, for cash for the
27
i
par value thereof and accrued interest thereon to date of
delivery, plus a premium of $ . It is hereby officially
found, determined, and declar-e-d-Wa-t the Initial Certificate
has been wild at public sale to the bidder offering the lowest
interest coat, after receiving sealed bids pursuant to an
Official Notice of Sale and Bidding Instructions and official
Statement dated June 2, 19871 prepared and distributed in
connection with the sale of the initial Certificate. Said
j Official Notice of Sale and Bidding Instructions and official
Statement, and any addenda, supplement, or amendment thereto
have been and are hereby approved by the Issuer, and their use
in the offer and sale of the Certificates is hereby approved.
It is further officially found, determined, and declared that
the statements and representations contained in said Official
Notice of Sale and Official Statement are true and correct in
all material respects, to the best knowledge and belief of the
City Council and the Issuer.
Section 16. FURTHER PROCEDURES. The Mayor of the Issuer,
the City Secretary Secretary of the Issuer, and all other
officers, employees, and agents of the Issuer, and each of
them, shall be and they are hereby expressly authorized, f
empowered, and directed from time to time and at any time to do
c and perform all such acts and things and to execute, acknowl-
edge, and deliver in the name and under the corporate seal and
on behalf of the Issuer all such instruments, whether or not
' herein mentioned, as may be necessary or desirable in order to
carry out the terms and provisions of this Certificate Ordi-
nance, the Certificates, the sale of the Certificates, and the
Notice of Sale and Official Statement. In case any officer
whose signature shall appear on any Certificate shall cease to
i. be such officer before the delivery of such Certificate, such
' signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all
° purposes the same as if such officer had remained in office
until such delivery. }
i
/ K
1 .
~ V
S P
~A f
~I
Sr l!"
I
t
28
r
i
GENERAL CERTIFICATE
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DENTON s
CITY OF DENTON r
We, the undersigned officers of the City of Denton, Texas
(the "Issuer") hereby certify as followsr
1. That this certificate is executed for and on behalf of
said issuer with reference to the issuance of the proposed City
of Denton Certificates of Obligation, Series 1987-A, dated June
1, 1997, in the aggregate principal amount of $1,100,000,
authorized by ordinance of the city council on June 16, 1987
(the "Ordinance"), initially issued and delivered as a single
fully registered certificate payable in installments to the
registered owner, but convertible into fully registered certi-
ficates in any multiple of $5,000 (collectively, the "Certifi-
cates").
2. That said issuer is a duly incorporated dome Mule
City, having more than 5000 inhabitants, operating and existing
under the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas and the
duly adopted Home Rule Charter of said-City, which Charter has
not been changed or amended since the passage of the ordinance
authorizing the issuance of the General Obligation Bonds,
Series 1987# dated April 1, 1987.
3. That no litigation of any nature has ever been filed
pertaining to, affecting, questioning, or contesting) (a) the
Ordinance which authorized said issuer's proposed Certificates
described in paragraph 1 of this certificate; (b) the issuance,
execution, delivery, payment, security, or validity of said
proposed Certificates, (e) the authority of the governing body
and the officers of said Issuer to issue, execute, and deliver
said Certificates, (d) the validity of the corporate existence
of said issuer, (e) the current Tax Rolls of said issuer, or
(f) the Home Rule Charter of said Issuer; and that no litiga-
tion is pending pertaining to, affecting, questioning, or
contesting the current boundaries of said Issuer.
4. That attached to this certificate and marked "Exhibit a
A" is a true, full, and correct schedule and statement of the
f aforesaid proposed Certificates, and of all presently outstand-,
j ing tux indebtedness of said Issuer.
5. That the currently effective ad valorem tax appraisal
roll of said issuer (the "Tax Roll") is the Tax Roll prepared
and approved during the calendar year 1986# being the most
r►cently approved Tax Roll of said issuer; that the taxable
i
I I
I
property in said issuer has been appraised, assessed, and
valued as required and provided by the Texas Constitution and
Property Tax Code (collectively, "Texas law")r that the Tax
Roll for said year has been submitted to the City Council of
said Issuer as required by Texas law, and has been approved and
recorded by said City Councilf and according to the Tax Roll
for said year the net aggregate taxable value of taxable
property in said issuer (after deducting the amount of all
applicable exemptions required or authorized under Texas law),
upon which the annual ad valorem tax of said issuer has been
imposed and levied, is $1,820,463,940.
6. That the Certificates additionally are payable from i
and secured by certain surplus revenues (not to exceed $10,000
in aggregate amount) derived by the City from the ownership and
operation of the City's Utility System (consisting of the
City's combined waterworks system, sanitary sewer system, and
electric light and power system), which revenues are designated
or defined as the "Surplus Revenues" in the Ordinance; and I
except for the Certificates, said Surplus Revenues are not
pledged to the payment of any obligations of the Issuer.
7. That no petition has been filed protesting the issu-
ance of the aforesaid Certificates.
8. That no default exists in connection with any bonds or
other obligations issued by the Issuer or the ordinances
authorizing same.
9. That co the best of our knowledge and belief the
statements and information set forth in the Official Statement
dated June 2, 1987, pertaining to the Certificates and the i
City, and particularly (i) the Utility System operating state-
ments, rates for services, and revenues and expenditures, (ii)
debt service requirements for both tax and revenue bonds, and
(iii) all other information set forth therein, are, true and
correct in all material respects.
SIGNED AND SEALED the _ day of , 1987.
0i y secretary- yor
(SEAL)
..J
it
"EXHIBIT A"
Certificates of obligation, series 1987-A, dated 6/1/87,
bearing interest, and maturing as set forth in the Ordinance
authorizing said Certificates.
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1985, dated November
10 1985, now outstanding in the principal amount of
$22,866,730.25, bearing interest, and maturing in the amounts
on February 15 of the years, as follows
I ?
(CURRENT INTEREST BONDS, ¢21,430,000) I
6.3011 10910M-881
6.60%1 2,365M-89t
6.9011 1,760M-901
7.1011 1,755M-911
` 7.3011 1,745M-921
7.5011 1,765M-931
7.70%t 10820M-941
7.901s 1,740M-9S1
' 8.0011 1,825M-961
8.3011 1,745M-971
! 3 8.2011 1,480M-981
8.30%1 1,520M-99.
(CAPITAL APPRECIATION BONDS, $1,436,730.25)
8.7011 $450,807.70 - 2000
8.80%1 326,699.60 - 2001
9.0011 273,727.95 - 2002
9.1011 232,457.50 - 2003
" 9.3011 1530037.50 - 2004
Certificates of Obligation, Series 1987, dated January It 1987,
` i now outstanding in the principal amount t1 $5000000, bearing
interest, and maturing in the amounts on July 1 of the years,
as follows:
9.0011 25M-98/921 '
8.0011 254-~31
6.20%s 25M- 41
6.3011 25M-951
6.4011 25M-961
6.5011 25M-971
E 6.60%1 25M-981
6.70%1 25M-991
6.80%1 25M-20001
6.9011 25M-011
760011 254-02/061
6.0011 2SM-0?.
r
I
I
r
r 1
General Obligation Bonds, Series 19871 dated April 1, 1987, now
outstanding in the principal amount of $3,5000000, bearing
interest, and maturing in the amounts on July 1 of the years,
as follows3
9.4041 175M-88/941
9.2091 175M-951
t 8.0011 175M-96/981
7.601: 175M-991
7.7011 175M-20001
7.801r 175M-011
7.90%3 175M-021
8.0011 175M-03/051
6.4011 175M-06/07.
Total outstanding General Obligation Indebtedness -
$2608660730.25.
~ p K
.K x I;F tu ~ t.
1
r p r J' '
I K ~
WrO
r
r
4L- t
i
,.♦1 K 3
h;v
I I i:r
r
7.
X11
j
.
...0
5
.
i
7
p 1
fY
h
1
will.1.1
s
1
G
1 • 1
t .Y,M1 ~
Iftl{
M Y,~
I1 tl ~Y
4 ~ I ° I ,Iti
iC
rY 9' 4 1
~ r.
L, 15
1 f -w.
-4 L
~ M1
V
ITY of AiNTON, TlXAS MUNICIPAL RUMOING / DENTON, TEXAS 76241 / TELEPHONE (817) $66.8240
M E M O R A N D U M
i
DATES June 5, 1987
TOi Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager
FROM: John F, McGrane, Executive Director for Finance
SUBJECT: REPEAL OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SALES TAX EXEMPTION
State Lax provides that telecommunication services are subject to state sales
tax but are exempt from all local sales taxesi however, the law also states
that if a c►`.y wants to apply its local sales tax to talecoeunun[catione, it
may repeal that exemption. The soonest the City may implement such sales tax
it October 1, 1987, If we want to do this we must notify the state
Comptroller by June 30, 1487, The procedure for repealing the exemption
afA1 placing our local sales tax on telecommunications would be as followai
1. The Council adopts an ordinance to repeal the local sales
~i tax exemption on telecommunication services, We have a copy
of a sample ordinance from the State Comptroller Office and
have referred It to Legal for possible consideration on
Tuesday, June 16, 1987.
2. The vote on the ordinance is entered into the minutes of
city council.
3 A copy of the ordinance is sent to the State Comptroller's
by U,S, registered or certified mail.
4. After the State Comptroller receives the notice, one full
calendar quarter must elapse. The repeal of the exemption
r then takes effect as the tax is imposed on the first day of
S ° ! the next calendar quarter.
j
,r
I. ..»M. .i . .a.. ..Y 9 t a. i r.: •nr.:~alii'~511':
I
,i
I
Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell
June 5, 1987
page two
it is my opinion that the reason for t`? one full quarter waiting period is to
allow the telephone companies enough time to reprogram their billing process
in order to allow for the sales tax collection. I believe it also allows the
is office to gear up for those collections. It we were to
state comptroller
pass the ordinance by June 30 and decide not to collect it at a future date# I
think we would have to allow one full calendar quarter for the same processes
to be reversed.
If I can give you any further information$ please advise.
+ r hn r. lSCGrane
q r 25291
a!
`eye n `
yt
e {r~ r 'h dl , i
0
a
r a
r •
~.1
~S
Y•
J
fib { 1 i •
' I e
qq S
~ I z1
k
I I'
~y A ~ r r
'Vtlk'N"fiA'GL"W.;r,7. , , . . , a r dt q. • + :c t l WCnY +nA Ott AYW
4
a
1846L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE "TAXATION" CHAPTER OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY THE ADLITION OF
SECTION 22-6 THERETO RELATING TO TAXATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SERVICES; MAKING THIS ORDINANCE CUMULATIVE; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION AND NAMING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
i SECTION I: That Chapter 22 (Taxation) of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended by the
addition of Section 22-6 thereto which shall read as follo•is:
Section 22-6. Taxation Of Telecommunication Services.
(a) A tax Is hereby authorized on all telecommunications
services sold within the City of Denton, Texas. For
purposes of this section, the sale of
s~ telecommunications services is consummated at the
location of the telephone or other telecommunications
device from which the call or other communication
originates. If the point of origin cannot be
determined, the sale is consummated at the address to
which the call or other communication is billed.
Lt +I
(b) The rate of the tax imposed by this section shall be
the same as the rate imposed by the City of Denton,
Texas, for all other local Sales and Use Taxes as
authorized by the legislature of the State of Texas.
t
The tax shall not serve to offset any franchise fees
i.' a able to the City by the terms Ordinance 78.21.
v (c) This section shall become effective as of October 1,
n 1987.
SECTION II: The City Secretary Is hereby directed to
forward to t e Comptroller of the State of Texas by United
Lti States Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested, a copy of this
ordinance along with a copy of the minutes of the City Council's
vote and discussion on this ordinance,
SECTION III: This ordinance shall be and is hereby declared
to be cumu a ve of all other ordinances of the City of Denton,
Texas, and this ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect
any of such other ordinances except insofar as the provisions
thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions,
if any, in such other ordinances are hereby repealed.
C ,
I
SECTION IV: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held
unconstitutional, such holding shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
SECTION V: This ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon Its passage and approved.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS the day of ,
1987. f
f
RAY STEPHENS
MAYOR
i
ATTEST:
h S
JENNIFER WALTE S, CITY SECRET,RY
# APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
t" DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY P.TTORNEY I ;y
j•
v
q'"w BY2 f ,z(
`i
r i
r~ '
,1$ ,
}P2 wAv; 1 e
ry,J ,
M1
T
R.
_i
DATE: June,YS, 1987
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ORDINANCE PROPOSAL TO PURCHASE DENTON COUNTY
ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. FACILITIES SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 77
AND ALONG BONNIE BRAE TO UNIVERSITY DRIVE.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilitle: Board, at their meeting of May S, 19870
recommended to the City Council purchasing of the electric
energy distribution facilities of Denton County Electric
Co-operative, Inc., generally located south of Highway 77, i
along Bonnie Brae to University Drive.
SUMMARY:
r
Electric energy distribution facilities as described herein
will be purchased from Denton County Electric Co-operative
x Inc., for a single, one-time payment of $24,600.
BACKGROUND:
The subject electric distribution facilities are presently
owned by Denton County Electric Co-operative, extending south
of Highway 77 and generally along the route of Bonnie Brae
4 presently serve a limited number of customers diva to the
k relatively underdeveloped condition of the area. This area Is
presently singly certified for servi.e from Denton Municipal
Utilities but had been "grandfathered" for service by Denton
County Electric Co-operative, Inc., for this line.
In addition, this action will Insure that all electric
revenues from future land developments will accrue to Denton
Municipal Utilities.
R 1 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The City of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, Citizens,
g.. Denton County Electric Cu-operative, Inc., Lfg, Department
and the City Council.
A:
TI
r`
i
r
N I; ~
I t i
1
j
F
Denton county Co-operative
Page 2
i
FISCAL IMPACT:
$24,600 paid to Denton County Electric Co-operative, Inc.,
from Electrical Distribution (02S2) Division, 1986-87 Budget
allocation for "Plant and Equipment".
{
t-
i
Resp fu/ll~ s b fitted:
U
loy arrell
City Manager
a
Prepared by:
grn e 4uoOs, it or
Electric Utilities
Approved:
1 ,/Q, ✓
e son, xecut ve rector _
-%:11f g
Department of Utilities
or ~
L~ { f
4.:IC 3
Exhibit I ordinance
1I Agreement
III Cost Breakdown
IV Location Map
r V Minutes of PUB meeting of May S, 1987
A,
I
xr'` r c a .
111 '
j °.`4 fd } 4874U:10-1.1
y'
Y. q
}
{
a
ti
1810L
r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON
AND DENTON EC IVEo NC. THE Of
ELECTRICAL CEQUIPMENTCTAND CFACILITIES, LAND FPROVIDING RCFORE AN
EFFECTIVE LATE.
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Denton to,
purchase the electrical equipment and facilities described here-
in; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36(f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$10,000, and Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton,
Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the
expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness 3
shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, I
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby approves and
authorizes the mayor and City Secretary to execute and attest,
respectively, the agreement between the City of Denton and Denton
County Electric Cooperative, Inc, for the purchase of electrical
equipment and facilities under the terms and conditions contained
in the agreement attached hereto.
SECTION 11. That this ordinance shall become effective
j immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1987.
RAT-9i EPHE , MA 0
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
{
ATTEST:
NNI'E LT R , CITY SECRETARY
rIi'i OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYUVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY C
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS {
BY: C V •1 r-y` - EM18
A
u
1810E
THE STATE OF TEXAS S AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS AND DENTON COUNTY ELECTRIC
COUNTY OF DENTON S COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE
AND SALE OF ELECTRICAL FACILITIES
Agreement made this day of 1987, between
the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation, ("Buyer"),
and Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc., a corporation
organized and operating pursuant to the Texas Electric
Cooperative Corporation Act (Article 1S28b), ("Seller").
i WHEREAS, Seller presently owns, maintains, and operates
electrical equipment and facilities within the City of Denton,
Texas, to service and su}ply customers with electrical service;
and
WHEREAS, Buyer wishes to purchase the electrical equipment
and facilities of Seller described.herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual consideration
and cov,:nants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. In consideration of the sum of Twenty-four Thoasand and
Six Hundred Dollars ($24,600.00) paid to Seller by Buyer, receipt
of which is hereby acknowledged, Seller does hereby sell, assign
and transfer to Buyer all its right, title and interest in the
poles, lines, wires, fixtures, and electric facilities listed in j
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference;
said electric facilities being located and installed in the City
f of Denton, Denton County, Texas, extending south from Highway 77
w along Bonnie Brae Street to University Drive, as shown in Exhibit
"B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
2. Seller hereby sells, assigns and transfers to Buyer all
its right, interest and title to the right-of-way easements
wherein the above-described electric facilities are located and
shall hereafter, upon the request of Buyer, execute any necessary j
assignments, deeds, or documents necessary to convey its Interest
in said right-of-way easements to Buyer. Buyer shall be
responsible for the cost of surveys and preparation of documents
and recording thereof necessary to effect such conveyance,
transfer, or assignment.
I 3. Seller covenants that it is the lawful owner of the
electric facilities herein conveyed; that they are free and clear
of all encumbrances of any kind; that it has the lawful right and
authority to sell and dispose of the same; and that it will
warrant and defend title thereto against any claims whatsoever.
,i
EXHIBIT..?
i
EXECUTED this day of 1987.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
RAY STEPHEN S, MAYOR
i
ATTEST:
F 'j+
JENNIFER W ALTERS, CITY
S R
r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
F APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEERA ADAASI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
a' CITY OF DENTONr TEXAS
r {
i
F >r ~.fi BY.
y1 "1
t DENTON COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,
INC.
fA?
BY:
ATTEST:
SECRETARY
PAGE TWO
I
I
r,
i
COST BREAKDOWN
Units Total
67 35-6 12,258.31
58 A-1 19219.78
1 A-2 10322.88
Z A-3 115.02
3 A-4 336.00
3 A-5 173.91
4 AS-1 363.13
9 30-4 1,158.29
4 M28-5 360.16
Idle 2 105-5 141.18
13 K-14 186.03
4 J-8 41.24
3 M8-10A 89.88
4 K-10 44.16
14 El-2 664.30
14 F1-2 M.76
1 E2-2 76.26
t6 DP 39.75
92 TPX 33.64
94 TP:C 142.01
8A CWC 11000.00
Sub Total 201539.68
r 201 Engr and OH 41107,77
240841.45 .4
Round to 240600.00 }<r.
„
a
Y' .
,
H ~
i
EXHIBITe. 3
a
V
F`
7.0
i
o ~
g ~ 1
~ r
: a
i
C
r
.
r
mz•cn~ ;
l Y w
y I5 ~ A~1,~ r ,
P
, y f y
i,' 7
7-1
~/eaff-;c Co~a~•a5ve~r _ 3
L I,3G~~L E~v~yy Di/ ~h~~+~+~~N • t
, ~ Ua:v<<r;Lj OH: f~a ~n..C b 3
I EXHIBIT y
y
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
MAY 5, 1987
5. CONSIDER PROPOSAL TO PURCHASE DENTON COUNTY ELECTRIC
B~ R 700
Tullos introduced this item explaining there are six to seven
customers in the referenced section of town. He explained
that electric energy distribution facilities as described
herein will be purchased from Denton County Electric
Co-Operative Inc., for a single, one-time payment of $24,600.
The subject electric distribution facilities are presently
owned by Denton County Electric Co-operative, extending south
of Highway 77 and generally along the route of Bonnie Brae
presently serve a limited number of customers due to the
relatively underdeveloped condition of the area. This area is
presently singly certified for service from Denton Municipal
Utilities but had been "grand fathered" for service by Denton
County Electric Co-Operative, Inc., for this line.
In addition, this action will insure that all electric
revenues from future land developments will accrue to Denton j
Municipal Utilities. i
Frady inquired as to whether we are paying for the wire,
ti E poles, etc., only. Tullos said yes, this is inventory cost
only, $240600. Line parallels transmission line on the other
{ side. We will change out transmission/meters, etc., at
estimated cost of $5,000. Total cost $30,000.
Boyd made a motion to recommend to the City Council that the
City purchase the electric energy distribution facilities of
Denton County Electric Co-Operative, Inc., generally located
i south of Highway 77, along Bonnie Brae to University Drive.
Second by Thompson. All ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
k
}
,
,
4
• " 4874U:12 ~
E.XHIBIT
DATF,: 06/16/87
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMATi 5F
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTIONS 1$-76 AND 14-77 TO
ARTICLE VI OF CHAPTER 1; "OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS" OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DRNTON, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR
E LOCAL FEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE TEXAS ALCOHOL AND BEVERAGE CODE
SECTION 11.38, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING
A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
I
RECOMItENDATION: j
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance.
{
SUMMARY I
The Texas Alcohol and Beverage Code permLts a city to collect D fee I
not to exceed one-half (1/2) the state fee for each permit issued E.
for premises located within the City. The City has 128 permits
issued of which 63% have renewed for 1987. This ordinance would
provide a penalty clause that would assist in enforcement of the
renewal of a permit.
v BACKGROUND:
The staff presented several problems concerning beer and wine
permits and private clubs to the Planning and Zoning Commission in a
study session. Staff is preparing an amendment to the requirements
concerning specific use permits, parking, screening, etc.
PROGRAMS DEPARMNTS OR GROUPS AFFECPED:
Planning and Development Department and individuals requesting or
renewing permits.
FISCAL IMPACT:
s4
`r Based on the current number of permits annual renewal fees would
smount to approximately $6,700.
Respe lly submit
i_
y
oy g
Prepared by- Cit Manager
C.;oile Carson
Urban Planner
4 . i
I Appr ed
Jeff Mey
Director of Planning
and Development
23888
1830L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTIONS 14-76 and 14-77 TO ARTICLE VI OF
CHAPTER 14 "OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS" OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR LOCAL
FEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE TEXAS ALCOHOL G BEVERAGE CODE SECTION
11.38, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
i SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
'r
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: k
SECTION 1. That the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Article VI of Chapter 14, is hereby amended by adding a j
section to be 14-76, which said section reads as follows: I
Section 14-76. Fees for Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
No holder of any permit from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage
Commission shall engage in the sale of alcoholic beverages
within the City limits without first having paid to the City
Secretary a non-refundable annual fee in the amount of
one-half (1/2) the state fee for each permit or renewal of a
permit that is issued and authorized by the Texas Alcohol
, and Beverage Code.
SECTION II. That the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Article VI of Chapter 14 is hereby amended by adding a
+ section, to be numbered 14-77, which said section reads as
follows:
Section 14.77. Penalty.
„z Any permittee, his agents, servants, or employees who sells
an alcoholic beverage without having first paid the iee
f specified in Sec. 14-76 and as authorized by Texas Alcohol
and Beverage Code Sec. 11.38, commits an offense and shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each and every sale of an
alcoholic beverage without a permit shall constiture a
separate offense and shall be punishable by a fine of not
less than ten dollars and not to exceed two hundred
dollars. This penalty is in addition to and cumulative of,
any other remedies a.s may be available at law and equity.
SECTION 111. That if any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or
application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held
' ~ a
i
invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such holding
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance, and the City Council of the City cf Denton, Texas,
hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions
j despite such invalidity.
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen l4 days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this
ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record -Chronicle,
the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten
(10) days of the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
, 1987.
i
RA STEP E , OR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
5
1
ATTEST:
t r , , •~'r,`' JENNIFER NAL ER CITY S RET ~s
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
s ~ 1ti,y
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
w 'a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
9a7 BY:
I
J
r
Y
~ a far. i 4
i
PAGE 2
i
1836L
j NO.
I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER ONE OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
I THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; PRESCRIBING QUALIFICATIONS FOR
MEMBERS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS OF THE CITY; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILFT+ CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the Code
of Or nances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended by
adding article II, which said Article reads as follows:
ARTICLE III QUALIFICATIONS FOR BOARD
AND COMMISSION MEMBERS
t
Section 1-21. Each member, in addition to qualifi-
cations prescribed by federal or state law or
ordinance, shall be a qualified voter of the City of
he
Denton, 1} payment of any taxes orlother tliabbe In ilities rduertheiCity.
Section 1-21. No member of a Board or Commission of
the City that has final decision making authority shall
have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in any
contract with the City or be financially interested,
directly or indirectly, in the sale to or by the City 4
of any land, materials, supplies or services. For
urposes of this section, Boards and Commissions which
have final decision making authority include, but are
not limited the iervice Zoning Commisssion, and the
Board of Adju tment, Civil S the
Building Code Board.
Section 1-23. Should a board or commission member
cease to meet the qualifications prescribed in Sec.
1-21 or Sec. 1-11, if applicable, hereof or should such
member be convicted of a felony during his tern of
service, such failure or conviction, as the case may
be, shall be cause for removal.
Section 1-24. The provisions of this Article shall not
apply to task forces, ad hoc committees or other commis-
lions established by the City Council from time to time
e
1
to make recommendations with respect to a particular subject
or issue and which are not intended to be permanent in
nature. `
SECTION 11. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, fi
sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or
application thereof to any person or circumstance is held
invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance, and the city Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions
despite any such invalidity.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate`eiy upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987.
RAY STEPHENS,
ATTEST:
ENNI ER A ThRS, CI Sf:CRE R
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA AD.4MI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
'S t
BY:5. '
s
.I
i
{
j
DATE:
1 CITY GOUNClL RETORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
~
jj SUBJECT-. Adoption of a resolution authorizing the city Manager to submit to k
j the Department cf Housing and Urban Development and Amendment to the
II 1986-87 Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds.
J i
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommends approval.
%i
SUMMARY:
This resolution alters the lot use of
rtin
improvements 7neardtheoMaallow
for street, sidewalk and parking ng
Luther Ring Jr. Center site.
BACKGROUND: recedin
The CDBG Committee approved the reallocation of funds to the p 8
° areas and approximately $20,000 to Housing Rehabil+tation at its April
1
20, 1987 meeting.
.j
1 PRUGRAAi5, LEi'ARTbiwl's Ok GkUUY5 A}FLLILD:
i. The CDBG division of the Planning and Community Development Department
will administer the program.
.l,J Cfr 1 ~FISCAL IMPACT-.
There will be no impact on the General Fund. ~
Res full s City Manager
d
:Xroa r by:
os s
Community Development Coordinator
APP ve
Executive Director
for Planning and Development
s
I
,
y,.
'r
CITY OF DENTON
Coh[MUNtTY DEVELOCMEN'T BLOCK. CRANT COMMITTEE
April 20, 1981
s
CDBG Members
Present: Lucy Campbell, Btrdell Car. rrphen, Don Chipman, Sibyl Evans
Dante Ferrara, Lovie Price, Jo Luker and Connie Wells
CDBG Members
Absents Rosemary Rodriquez
i
CDBG Staff
. ~r Present: Elizabeth Evans, Community D w elopment Manager and Penny black,
' Clerk.
+ Other Stuff
Present: Steve Brinkman, Director of PARD; Betty McKean, Exec. Director
x of Municipal Govt./Economic Development
r
}f , CI tI¢F1 n4
Yreaents Cary Juren, Gary Juren Architects; Mr. 6 Mrs. Reginald Logan,
qr.
ti^; , Chairman, NAACP Housing Authority Committee.
Y r
+ Jy
I. ihalrpureon, Ms. Wells called the meeting to order at 5:37 p.m.
. a ~ ,
er kwy~~ ? Mr. Reginald Logan introduced himself as Chairman of the Housing Authority ;y.
Committee which serves as an advisory board for Board Directors of Phoenix
1• ¢,`,I and Heritage Oaks Apartments. He spoi.e briefly about the Heritage Oaks
Apartments. Mr. Logan said a survey of the Phoenix Apartments was conducted
in March on the problems and environment of the apartment complex, his findings
?k , are detailed below. Replanting of grass/trees where needed. He believed the
r'
' elderl should be grouped together in a central section of the complex
ray,1; r+':,;• although he felt it would takr several years to do that. Repairs to the
apartments would consist of lrterior repainting of all units, replacement
of carpet along the stalrwaya beginning with apartmentr elderly tenants
~1« occupied and inspections to note additional repairs needed. Total
exter- mination by a professional company. Paving of the waterways through Phoenix
to curtall rate, mosquitos and roaches, various workshops for Unwed Teenage
ti« g taothers, drug abuse, etc. and a 'cility to conduct meetings on the pro-
'`'a perty. The total requested fund +mount is $102,000.00. `
;i"Ja°~ rr• Ms. Luker asked why would it take so long to group the elderly,
Mr. Logan said there's a high turnover of residents at Phoenix although a`
the vacan+: apartments fill up quickly so it would take time to move all
t+ elderly tenants.
1 41 y «
Ms. Campbell said the CIP ba,l allocated $90,000. for paving Phcenix's
+4)waterways between 1996-89 so bond issue money should take care of that
project,
,
1
Jy`1.
Ms. Wells asked how much money for the workshops.
Ms. Luker said volunteer help would be good If it were available.
Mr. Logan said some students had come out before doJug n study on drug
treatment at no charge.
Mr. Wells said Larry Mancock had conducted workshops for DISD and intern
programs with soicalworkers so possibly he would help if contacted.
M.1. Carstarphen asked how would he tie this in with URA for double coor-
dination. Mr. Logan said he would discuss these requests with the staff
in order to determine that.
Ms. Evans asked whether tena;;ts or paid workers would do the painting.
Mr. Logan said he would prefer to have workers do the painting.
r
Ms. Wells asked would someone from DHA's staff be appointed to watering
the yards once grass was planted. Mr. Logan said be would also discuss
that matter with DNA's staff and Board Meeting also being held tonight.
Ms. Luker asked if DHA had funds.
Mr. Logan said he did not believe DHA has any s-,ecial monies provided for
any of these needed activities.
.i ,
h
Ms. Wells asked did Phoenix receive $40,000. from the 1987-88 grant funds.
j Ms. Evans said yes and repairs to be completed are plumbing/kitchen cabinets
r' for about 10 apartments. Don Gill of Specialty Contracting won the bid
r, e-
series with a bid amount of $22,000.00
Ms. Carctarphen asked what were the chances of Parks Board and the NAACP
Vr
wotktnl; together for workshops at MLK.
Mr. Brinkman said he had informed Mr. Logan that Parks could assist him
when the center opened for workshop support.
The Cummittee thanked Mr. Logan for his presentation.
11. N*r. Brinkman presented a more detailed request for MLK from the Parks .
;yt Department. If CDBG funds are received $1,350,000. would be earmarked
for the center project in the following areas:
Building $1,200,000 Bond Funds
Parking/Walkways $ 100,000 CDBG Funds t
Irrigation/Grass $ 8,000 Beautification Fund
}cy Equipment $ 12,500 Private Donation Fund
Equipment $ 30,000 Recreation Center
TOTAL $1,350,000
Mr. Brinkman said this does not provide for contingency funds although
5 V some alternatives incorporated in building plans if. 160. sq. ft. goes
over the bid/budgeted amount.
1 Ms. Luker asked what was the private donation source.
Mr. Brinkman said from Mr. Branch's $12,000. donation for the center, the
$500 extra is interest the money has earned.
J,,
N4'
~ a Y n ♦ .i ..a Y. f Yr~ v,(y.. V+/ .,•t19'°R.i 1t~°m"f,Uil
p
Ms. McKean said the Davls Bacon Act is what Steve was referring to
when discussing federal wnre rates fnr ti., renters building construction.
Ms. Wells asked would parking/walkways be contracted out or the Street
Dept, work with this.
Ms. Evans said probably all street construction will be bid out together.
Ms. Carstarphen expressed tier concerns for construction alternatives/
adjustments possibly being made.
Mr. Juren said the bid amount could not be positive until actual bids were
received . August is the targeted date for bids and about 6 alternatives
would be listed on those bids to get an idea of what materials can be used
without going over the budget.
Mr. Ferrara asked what contractors would be used.
Mr. Juren said bidding on large projects such as this required bonding
capacity performance, yet it was open to all contractors interested in
the City of Denton.
Ms. Luker asked what happens to built in qualifications for contractors.
Mr. Brinkman said the specifications and oversight would be extreme therefore
the Ceneral would definitely be on the job.
Ms. Wells said the high bond will push a lot of unqualified contractors
out of the bidding series.
Ms. Luker said this project and the citizens were very sensitive and every-
one involved should keep that in mind and work together.
Mr. Logan asked if Mr. Brinkman could he forsee the (2) future centers
^ picking up with more that MLK would receive.
Mr. Brinkman said the Bond issue monies will be all the other centers will
1 k receive for building construction etc.
Ms. Wells asked if land had already been acquired.
Mr. Brinkman said the 2nd center has had It acres donated to the Parke
Dept. and the land was located on Sherman Drive and Lnkeshire although the
3rd centers site has not been acquired at this Lime.
xi
III. Ms. Cnmpbetl made a motion to amend the 1486 budget of $195,000. allocated
to rehab. and reallocate it to the neighborhood center; budgeting $100.000.
of contingency funds for parking lot/walkways; $45,000. for additional
*44 i architects fees; $30,000, for repavement of Morse Street and the balance
of $20,000. to be reallocated to the rehab budget. Ms. Luker seconded the r
l, f
motion, the committee voted and the amendment passed with a 7 to 0 vote.
Ms. Evans informed the committee of the need to rank h funding requests
for 1987-86 grant funds. She said the total amount of funds were $571,558.00
The CDBC Staff wants $300,000 to be allocated for rehab; $113,000 allocated 3
for Administration leaving $158,558. for additional funding requests. The
1j;a I committee spoke briefly on the requests they favored and scheduled to meet
j April 27, 1987 to discuss the recommendation to council.
IV. The meeting adjourned at 7$30 p.m.
3
}
,
}
' 1n
r,N AMENDMENT TO THE 1986 FINAL STATEMENT
OBJECTIVES
OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
This is an amendment to the amended statement submitted to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on November 261 1986. The City of Uenton
wishes to reallocate 4195,962.51 previously funding neighborhood center
i construction to the following:
1. Neighborhood Center/Architectural Services 15,000.00
Payment of architectural services for the design of the Martin Luther
King, Jr. Community Center located at Morse, Wilson and Newton Streets
Objectives To impro^.z the quality of life and promote neighborhood
i' stabilization in the targeted area.
2. Street Improvements 30100040
Street near the proposed
Curb, gutter and paving improvements to Norse
} Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Center.
Objectivei To upgrade substandard infrastructure in targeted areas as a
part of the process to stabilize neighborhoods
3, Neighborhood Center /Sidewalks and Parking Lots ¢1000000.00
;.'It Construction and paving of sidewalks and packing lots near the Martin
Luther King, Jr. Community Center.
Q'Y'3 PLC'' yc
Y11 Objectives To improve the quality of life and promote stabilization in
the targeted area.
4. Housing Rehabilitation 200462.51
Continuation of the 1984 and 1985 program to rehabilitate aubatandnrd
l
houses inhabited by low or moderate income persons living in the city.
at~ rr , ~ r fF P I'
+y4 r $1
~ Objective[ To bring existing housing at.ock into compliance with housing
code and arrest deteriorating neighborhoods in the target area.
,~t 3Rn,
k I3
Total Funded[ 270,462.51
ry
3
r '~Xj
i
0623k
1 " "r
y ~
f '
ry I~.
r
s
18.i5L
RLSOLUlIUN NO.
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED STATEMENT
SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 26, 1986, TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT OF A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND
PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE VERIFICATIONS, AS
.1 AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED BY THE HOUSIF,G AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED.
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, is concerned with the
development of viable urban communities, Including decent
housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic
opportunities; and
' I
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, has a special concern for
persons of low and moderate income; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, as an entitlement city,
has prepared, through a citizen participation process, a program
„ for utilizing its first year entitlement funds in the approximate
r fl amount of $557,384; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, had previously allocated
i an approximate amount of $195,984.00 of the entitlement funds for
funding neighborhood center construction; and
4 •S
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, now desires to reallocate
an approximate amount of $195,962.51 of the neighborhood center
p, construction funds for the purposes of: neighborhood center
architectural services, street improvements, neighborhood center
sidewalks and pparking lots, and neighborhood center housing
rehabilitation; NOW,THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
f, SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
! i author zes t e City Manager to sign and submit to the Department
of !lousing and Urban Development an amendment for the
' reallocation of funds to the amended 1986 Final Statement that
ti was previously submitted for a
" grant application for entitlement fundsunderthe Housing an and appropriate
a Development Act of 1974, as amended.
SECTION 11. That the City Council of the City of Denton, I
Texas, aut orizes the Director of Planning and Community
.Y Development to handle all fiscal and administrative matters
related to the amended final statement. ,
.10
h '4F} , .Jw I
V .wi. y .
i
u
i
n
SECTION ill, That this Resolution shall take effect
immeTamt-ely from and after its passage.
SECTION IV, That the City Secretary is hereby authorized to
furnish copies of this Resolution to all interested parties.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of June, 1987,
i
i
tv
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
r
JENNIFER WALTER SO S CRE r
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
1 DEBRA ADMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY
J3 t '
oa .
11~ ~ 1W
Fy fv +
V
Y(. I t L •f I a
{ \ T
%
1~ }A #
i St
s~ fir, M V i~
; ~Y 9 ~ al
k Jlr fit ~b r.,'t1 r. .A..a iGa ,c~a~.M4.svJ''i.r;~W A"..(~N'± Ifn r"x ;.:fi, r5e;,ikt,l.: 52MrYTt:~.frCM$r~ * i',
.S f r y '
Y
~v r}
t
e
a. "
` J
DATE: June 16, 1987
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS 01: THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: RECEIVE UTILITY DEPARTMENT FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN FY I988-1992,
i
.y
RECOMMENDATION:
!
The Public Utilities Board and the Planning $ Zoning
Commission, at their meetings of April 1 and May 27, 19870
respectively, recommend to the City Council approval of
subject Capital Improvement Plan.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
In February 1987, the Utility Staff began planning the FY
j 1988-92 Capital Improvements Program. This process Involved
forecasting needs and priorities of new facilities for the
City's Electric, Water and Wastewater systems.
" f Annual planning sessions were held with the Board and Utility
k; Department Management Staff. A joint meeting for public input
was held with the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board
on April 1, 1987. The Planning and Zoning again reviewed the
3 Utility Capital Improvement Plan on May 27, 1987,
The attached document represents the results of this process.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUP( AFFECTED:
The City of Denton Municipal Utilities, supporting
f
departments, and the Citizens of Denton.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Please refer to the Executive Summary included within the
Capital Improvements Plan document.
Y y 4i'
I i r
r ~r
4r ry i~ f '
03
+ti is
t~ en` i ter'
r Y d' ~ '
,
, M
i
I
i
Capital Improvement Plan
Page 2
s
Res tfully u witted-
I oy arrle //I
City Manager i
r
Pre"red by
R.f
E. e son, Executive D rector
Department of Utilities
j, Approved by:
~w~ri w a °r
} e son, xecut ve rector
0, Department of Utilities
Exhibit
I Five Year C1P - Final Draft
.11 Minutes of PUB meeting of April 1, 1987
III Minutes of P&Z meeting of May 27, 1987
SsJ r
Y d
1 , 1 a I dy 1
I ~ if: i f1}f
r
r'
03
N1,
a ~4
r t. I
4874U:4-6 ' a.
1° ° = F A {
,
~
.
+ r:
v
t ~1 !
a
i Y
r
1
~ 4{ ~ ICI
III
.i
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
MAY 5, 1987
4. RECEIVE FINAL DRAFT ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1988-92 CAPITAL
t
IMPROV
Nelson introduced this item and presented an overview
itemizing a total capital improvements plan representing a $2
million 3ain over last year's projections, for a total CIP of
$81 million, Laney requested lead time items be identified in
future CIP infor.naticNelson extended an invitation to the
Board to attend the upcoming budget discussions with the
Executive Staff.
After an in depth review of all line items, Frady made a
motion to recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission to
recommend to the City Council approval of the Utility
Department 1988-92 Cspital Improvements Plan. Second by j
Thompson. All ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
IT,
+ Y nu
~ +Y
I
h y Xr 4
y5
I+4! T: I
~I
IT.
' 71)
1' A
~Yl 'Y y a jf 1 ~
14
+6411 I
{ L
ids h ~ .~r ' r'M
+a ~
}
gg ~~y ~ 9
eY
4974U:'i3
5 p
I, j 0,11
C of M, r"'~
f T 9 ~ ~ .4 ^
4 s "Y r
6
1 ~
t
V
G ti ti
y
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 27, 1987
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday. May 27, 1987, at S:00
p a., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Fuline Brock, Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr.,
Ivan Glasscock and Judd Halt
Absent: William lawman
Present from Staff: Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator; Denise
Spivey, Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Rick
Svehla, Deputy City Manager and Executive Director for
Public Works; Robert Nelson, Executive Director for
Utilities; John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance,
E Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; David Ellison,
Assistant to the City Manager; John Cook, Fire Chief;
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation; Jerry
Clark, City Engineer; koss Litman, Emergency Management
Coordinator; David Salmon, Civil Engineer, Srini
Sundaramoorthy, Civil Englnee:; and Susan Kitchell,
Secretary
Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order.
1. MINUTES: Mr. Claiborne stated that on page 4, paragraph 7,
f~ie-'f3rst sentence should read... "Mr. Claiborne stated that
in an area of light industrial o residential street classi-
fication would not be applicable."
Mr. Claiborne stated that on page 6, paragraph 12. the first j
sentence should read... "Mr. Claiborne asked abou, the effects `
j of having a road from Spencer Road to the Mayhill interchange
l of Loop 281 to connect the loop to 1.3S."
It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Ms. Cole and
unanimously carried (S-U) to approve the c:inutes of the
regular meeting of May 13, 1981 as corrected.
II. WE A RECOMMENDATION 10 ThE C11t C WNCIL ON THE UTIL11Y
CAPITAL LMFR(jVtMtNrS PLAN.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Nelson stated that the Public Utilities
oaS iecommend :d approval of the Utility Capital Improve-
4 cents Plan and the plan was explained to the Conmission at the
last study session. He said that he was available to answer
questions.
t`' 1 DECISION: It was moved by Mr. Claiborne, seconded by
}6 rR E~cue and unanimously carried (5.0) to recommend ap-
proval of the Utility Capital Improvements Plan.
z Mr. Holt arrived at the meeting.
y ,
I1I. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. S•193. Petition of Cross Timbers Girl Scout Council
4 ky' s requesting a specific use permit in an agricultural (A)
zoning district on a S.4 acre tract located at 4000 West
University Drive (U.S. Highway 390). The property is
further described as Lot 6, Block E Ranch Estates Sub-
division. This property Is, currently the site of sit
>A atandoned veterinary clinic. If approved, the specific
use permit trill allow the utlllzation of the existing
structure for use as the office/headquarters of the
x r, Cross Timbers Girl Scout Council.
Six notices were nailed to propertyy owners within 200
Ceet; one reply form was received Sn favor, no reply forms I
were received in opposition. 4
von"
F 6 2 Minutes
may 13, 1987
Page S
Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the prelietnary
plat of the Gigllottl Addition, Lot 1, Block I and that
Metro Street be designated as a collector street,
therefore sidewalks will be required.
Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and motion unanimously carried
(6.O).
r
C. A-48. Proposed annexation of approximately 69.1694 acres
Sege part of the S. yen ter Survey, Abstract No. 1315; C.
Chacon Survey, Abstract No. 298; J. Baker Survey, Abstract
No. 47; J. Dickson Surrey, Abstract No. 342; and the A.
Cannon Survey, Abstract No. 2324 And located adjacent and
south of FM 7181 and east of 0I~ Alton Road.
:
STAFF REPURI: Ms. Carson stated that this is a proposed
annexat on of approximately 69.1694 acres located along
,M 21 1Aand consists of ■ ZSO foot strip and Inclusion of
After discussion with in October 1986, the Council requeatedththe at theystaffobegin
the annexation process but allow time for the completion
c the plat. A variance of the Subdivision Regulations
oncernlof fire flow was requested and was aroved
the Planning and Zoning Commission since on existingbwater '
line was located along FM 2181. She said that the beauti-
fication Task Force has Identified FM 2181 as a major
entranceway Into the City of Denton. She Bald that with
this annexation the City would have some control over the
land uses in the area and possible development. Some
opposition has been expressed but the City Council has
chosen to proceed. Completion of this annexation is
scheduled for July 7.
Mr. Claiborne asked if Skylab would be a legal nonconform-
tIungreuwhse.eMs.
annexed Carson the s use would i be t a the legal e non chis a ontormingc
'r use and added that the business would have to be operating.
j She said that if no structure exists at completion of the
c beforetbunldingowners would have to get proper coning
DECISION: Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of A-48.
econ a by Mr. lawman and notion unanimously carried
1V. Adjourn to a work session In the Civil Defense Room to receive
staff input on the Capital Improvement Program and davelop a
ti recommendation to the City Council,
< <
i'. Mr. Ellison stated tl.at when the Executive Committee ranked
the proposed projects they looked at the growth 1n the area
and the actual needs. he said that the Executive Committee's
1 ranking of the projects has been submitted to the Planning and
Zoning Commission for its consideration, he stated that staff
is here to justify their priority rankings and answer
questions.
Mr. McGrane stated that the staff is trying to et away from
the financial aspects of the program and staff eels that the
a p ; + t ranking system will provide an outlet. He stated that staff
`u assessed growth in the next five years at an it growth rate
and with this collections will bring Ih s5,800 CUU. He said
V °s> ; that the current debt service in 1991 will I be ~S,300,000, he
stated that the difference is not great but If the growth rate
is smaller and the program has been authorised, the Commission
can go back to the ranking system and make other decisions.
" Roland Laney, Chairman of the Public Utilities Board, stated
that the Commission considers a Capital Improvement Program
for utilities, fie added that they do not depend on tax money
i
P 6 2 Minutes
May 13, 1987
Page b
to fund the utilities program. he said that they follow a
general ranking system. He said that the Utility Capital
Improvement Program is divided into two categories: 1)
capital projects that enhance the entire utility system, and
2) projects that are directed at areas of growth.
Mr. Nelson explained and showed major electric, water and
sewer projects. He said that not all of the projects are
i c%itak i%rovem4nt projects and that some of the projects are
I repairs. He added that they also are hoping for state loan
I availability. He said that the purchase water cost will
decrease dramatically when Lake Ray Roberts is on line. He
said that there is a chance that bonds will have to be sold it
1988.
lit Mr. Ellison stated that the Plannin and Zoning Commission
will take action on the Utility Capftal Improvement Program at
its next meeting.
i Mr. Brinkman stated that the last bond issue passed by the
voters approved recre, 'on centers and athletic fields. He
said that these ppro ec are really needed. He said that the
i 1991.92 request is or an indoor/outdoor pool. He said that
the exive sting pool is overcrowded and it is possible that they
wlll ha to turn people away in the future, he said that
there are a few opptions on where to put a pool facility but
felt that the fac111ty is critical to the community.
Gilbert Bernstein, DISD, stated that lie felt there is addi-
tional need for a pool in Lentos and would like to see it
? added in the area of new high school on Mckinney Street.
kay McFarlane, NTSU, stated that they submitted several pro-
jeces and that the projects were preliminary because they are
a~ currently working on a major masterplar. He said that next
year they would have ■ more thought out program.
' Mr. Cook stated that the aerial device is the most critical.
' because of the safety factor and the fact that the insurance
try rates would decrease. He added that as Denton reaches certain
population levels that aerial devices are required.
'a~•,,~ Mr. Svehia stated that equipment Is not normally ■ CIP item
but that this piece of equipment is critical. I
Mr. Litman stated that the current emergency warning system
only alerts 131 of the city. He said that with the new system
"a of five big sirens and one small siren located at fire
4r^ stations and city facilities that 931 of the city would be
alerted to bad weather situations.
i
. .A Mr. Claiborne asked about buying the system a little bit at a
time. Mr. Litman stated that it would cost more money because
packages are less expenslve. Mr. Claiborne stated that he
would like the figures of purchasing the system over c period
of years.
trMr. Clark explained and showed the projects on a map in
+r regards to traffic/streets/drelnage.
" Mr. Claiborne asked about the effects of hsvitg a road from
Spencer koad to Mayhill interchange of Loop 218 to co,neet the
loop to 1-35. Mr. Clark stated that it would be quick trip to
1.35 and would take a lot of the traffic off the Internal
streets. {
,at Ms. Carson stated that the Land Use Planning Committee has
identified this area as one of the four major activity centers
and the Committee does encourage that all major activity
centers have good accessibility.
i
r'
F G Z Minute:.
May 13, 199)
Page 7
Mr. Svehla stated that he felt this road is a necessity in
this case.
Mr. Clark exp;mined that the Masch $ranch Road extension was
ranked as a priority by the Executive committee but due to the
cost the Executive COmmittee requested that phases be deter-
mined. Staff suggested four phases as follows: University
Drive to Jim Christal Road Jim Christal Road to Airport Road,
Airport Road to Spring Roaa, and Spring Road to i-3S.
k Ms. Carson stated that intent is to establish the airport area
E as a major industrial area and the Land Use Planning Committee i
i listed this road as a high or the highest priority and for FM
2449 to tie into Masch Branch Road so chat the emphasis from
1-35 would be on the airport. Mr. Clark stated that this road
could not be constructed in one year and the phase construction
is the best way to Droteed
Mr. Fowling stated that the sooner the lcuprovements can be
mcde to the airport the better. He said that the Federal
Aviation Comalttee is willing to
901 if the city pays
s
101. He explained the projects. pay Y p Y
k, Mr. Svehla stated that the Executive tcomittoe ranked the
ff airport projects high because of the 9U-10 program.
Ms. Carson stated that several businesses, associations, and
a organisations have asked for signs from the city to direct
~i them to the d0wntdwn area, colleges, ete. She said that they
are currently petting cost estimates frog the tngineering
Department. She said that they had considered putting In t1P
u~ but are now considering contributions it the cost for the
signs is reasonable.
All commission members agreed to have another work session
after the May 27, 1997 regular meeting.
>l , ,Tw
Meeting adjourned at 4:40 p.m.
,
r
. I
• rr i
<
r C y~
1 r
a„w, . . .
41' vJ" T2~
C~py ~,t i ~jw w -
`{`{M5
Tf 1 ~ V A't
JR Uv
y F
11yy1
r
y. ~ dill
r aka.
=--8
ciryofDENroNjaxas MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, 7EXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE'8171566.8200
j - -
i
i
i
a
June 16, 1967
i
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
The Planning and Zoning Commission respectfully submits its
recommended Capital Improvement Program for 1991-92. Ii: our
unanimous opinion, these projects will positively and directly
affect a significant and diverse share of our population. Ve
also think. the program is com,atible with some of the states!
and conceptual policies of the City.
y We take our role in the capital improvement process very
+ seriously because it provides an opportunity to consider our
future from a city-wide perspective. Our fundamental concern
and dilemma has been selecting projects that will do the most
' for As many as possible, yet are fiscally sound. A mechanism
for Astabllshing priorities and ranking requests was introduced
this year and we strongly support its refinement and continued
use. Our aim is to make our process as systematic, objective
and comprehensive as possible.
'the Planning and Zoning Commission sincerely appreci2tes the
}pportunI to serve our community and does hereby officially
`E! transm zTi$-1drCument _,o
the City Council of Denton, Texas.
R T. scue,, c, uline Bro
F C I 1
` S Ru C le Hp
~.,~am mm n van asscoc
Billne, Cha r an
ry~
i
3 S O SM
?C
Up
n 5
1
t
` C I
1991-92 CAPITAL IMPROV DILNTS PROGRAM
Recommended
by the
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 27, 1987
iro ect Category Cost j
Intersection Control Signals Streets $ Traffic s 225,000
Turn Lanes for Arterials Streets 6 Traffic 900000
Kingfisher Drainage Drainage 75,000
Masch Branch Road (Phase 1) Streets $ Traffic 573,125
380 to Jim Christal
r' Masch Branch Road (chase 11) Streets 8 Traffic 19504,931
r Jim Christal to 1515
tAirfield Lighting Airport Improvements 2500000
Runway Taxiway Extension Airpcrt Improvements 312,500
utility Runway Taxiway Airport Improvements 2000000
5 ! 'w
Pedestrian Signals Streets 6 Traffic 301000
Cooper Creek Channel Drainage 100000000
? SO Meter Indoor/Outdoor Pool Parks 6 Recreation 100000000 w.
Second Aerial Device Fire $00,000
Outdoor Emergency Siren Emergency Management 253,7SO
'4 l Bookmobile Library 250,000
TOTAL $6,264,306
r
r r~
r rn
•
t.. „ nw rvwYWnM.I RIB.
'a • 3
1991-92 Capital improvement Program
Recommended
by the
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 27, 1987
Pro ect Overall Category
~ Cate or Cost Cumulative Rank Rank
Intersection Control Streets i 225,000 # 2250000 1 1
Signals
Traffic
Turn Lanes for Streets i 90,000 3150000 2 2
Arterials Traffic
Kingfisher Drainage Drainage 75,000 3900000 3 1
r} Masch Branch Road IPh I) Streets i 5730125 963,125 7 4
F 380 to Jim Christal Traffic
j'
Masch Branch Road IPh II) Streets 6 11501,931 2,468,056 7 4 I
Jim Christal to 1515 Traffic
Airfield Lighting Airport 250,000 2,718,056 11 2
Improvements
Runway Taxiway Airport 312 500 3,0300556 12 3
Extension tmprovements
Utility Runway Airport 2000000 3, 230,556 25
Taxiway Improvements 6
s~ Pedestrian Signals Streets i 30,000 30260,556 8 5
Traffic
F. Cooper Creek Drainage 10000,000 412600556 4 2
Channel
SO Motor Indoor/ Parke 6 100000000 50260,556 28 1 t
i Outdoor Pool Recreation
l ,
Second Aerial Device fire 5000000 50760,556 40 1
1{ Outdoor Emergency Emergency -253,750 6,014,306 30
y` Siren Management 1
Bookmobile Library $ 150,000 6,2641308 41 1
l~i 1,a
.
f
,
..6
{
STREETS AND TRAFFIC ~
MIpIECf TITLE AND NIIMaER
Intersection Control Signals Cost - $225,000 pl
!t•ONINLE PCMRTMEk AND DIVISION
Public Works / Engineering nivision I
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP jl
Intersection Control Signals. At least three I ~4
signals will be needed by 1991-92. Several'; '
signals were approved in the 1986 CIP but the
last installation will occur in 1988 no that
will leave a three (3) year span to recover
from. The signals listed are the areas we feel
will most likely need traffic signals iv that
tfine frame. The projects are not ranked in
order of priority. Selection of three signals
from this list or other critical areas would be
at the election date.
1) Kings Row at I'4p 288
2) Avenue D at I-35
3) Sherman Drive at Loop 288 _
4) Sherman Drive at Kings Row _ J
3) Lillian Miller at Southridge
0) Teasley Lane at Lillian Miller _
7) Mockingbird at McKinney M 7 '
8) Avenue D at Eagle
9) Oak and Hickory at Ronnie Brae \
10) Stuart Road at Loop 288 /
1
J
i
1
STREETS AND TRAFFIC
Moxa TITLE AM NUMbER
Turn Lanes for Arterials Coat - 540.000
~E UPOATYENT AND gYI5I0N
public Works / Engineering
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP
I Turn lanes are an ' essential component In expanding capacities Ifor an intersection by
getting the slower turning vehicles out of
through lanes. % "dv
Turn Lanes for Arterials - 3 Intersections ' -
I
1) Oak at Carroll - northeast and northwest
j corners
2) Hickory at Carroll - southwest corner
1) Sherman at Windsor - southeast and
northwest corners
4) Bell at Highway 380 - all four corners r
'i
S) Ft. North Drive at I-35 -ell four corners «.r... t
6) Bonnie Brae at Highway 380
7) Highway 380 at Malone u J
8) Hinkle at Highway 380 -
9) McKinney at Audra r 1
107 McKinney at Carroll - northeast and n
southeast corners
/ T._ f
- -J t
iI
-
• a.
~wn ww,i r. r r
DRAINAGE
r=Kingfisher T TITLE NUMBEN
Drainage Cost - $75,000 43
IIESrON E pEPARTYENT AND DIVISION ,
Public Works / Engineering
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP _
This project is an extension at the northwest
corner of the Lome Del Rey (Oriole and
Hummingbird) Drainage Systems. Many of the
homes at the west end of Kingfisher (where it i `
joins to Oriole and north to where it runs east)
are flooded regularly from the water that comes
I~
down Mockingbird from the Audra basin to the
north. Collection of the water before it gets 1
to theme back yards is necessary as the quantity D • •
of water is over 100 cubic feet per second. Y 1
i rrrr
The City would design a system to run up l
Kingfisher. We would also extend the trunk
~I system up Mockingbird to intercept the water
! before it spreads out into the field and runs to
Klagfiaher. j
II N
I
I '
! y1
it L..~.
t
+ STREETS AND TRAFFIC
IIIOdLCT TITLE AND NUMeEII
Much Branch Road - Phase I Coat - $573,125 i4
IIL All YEN AND OIYI! N
Public Works / Engineering
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP
Masch Branch Road bas been targeted by the Land
i Use Committee in their recent Development Guide l
1111 Update as critical to opening up the Denton
Airport area for development as a mayor
employment center. The project will ultimately '
run `from Highway 380 to 135 W. Phase i will 1 l
construct the section between Highway 380 and
Jim Christal Road.
The firat two sections will alto immediately
I I
relieve Y.M. 1515 from peak hour congestion that
results from the existing factories and plants PH•I
In the area.
i
i
t .
jx
f a
.
STREETS AND TRAFFIC
jM$sch TIM AND NUMKA
Branch Road - Phase 11 Cust - $1,5040931 8
k fNL OEM11 PENT AND OIYISION
Public Works / Engineering
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP
i
Ptuue II of the project will ru;3 from Jim
j Christel to P.M. 1515. This sectioa should be { 7d
j designed and built with Chase I cue to the
eoddition of Jim Christel. It's surface is not '
usable by large traffic loads.
-2
N
` I
l '
...4y W MDW~i.0.~'..Y+.✓rrb.v.
y
r
s
t
i .
r STREETS AND TRAFFIC
rP=Fedestri&nn CT TITLE ANUYOER
Signals Cost - $30,000 e9
R SWE DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION
Public Works / Engineering
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP
The Denton Independent School District is 4 II
expanding out into the nerdy developed areas of
Denton to keep schools within reasonable .I
distances of the population centers. Several ~.r •-:,v
{ new schools have recently been constructed and II wowp
i may need pedestrian signals at the intersections I 1 ,
to help the children cross at signalized I
intersections of special locations. There are
numerous other locations that need pedestrian `
crossings. Possible locations are as follows.
1) Locust at Windsor - Evers Park School -
2) Crescent and PultO - Denton High s
3) Pennsylvania at Teasley - Sam Houston
4) Stuart and Hercules - Jennings
S) Stuart and Windsor - Strickland and k r
Jennings
6) Bell at Windsor - Strickland I
I. ~7 ti
r
i
i ff
r
DRAINAGE
M"CT TITU AND NUMKN
Cooper Creek Channel Phase T Cost - $1,000,000 #10
IUI/pNSISL( p(PAIITY(NT ANO DIVISNNI
Public Works / Engineering
Phase 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION NAP
Cooper Creek has experienced a significant share
of Denton's development boo4. Some measures are
necessary, such oa, upgrading bridges and #
culverts, cleaning and widbning of the channel
sections, placing concrete rip-rap in areas that 1 a \ -
experience erosion (bends, at bridges, etc.), J `1
And streamlining the design to increase the ,
efficiency of flows. This project has been
delayed for many years because of its very high N
cost estimate (=4,000,000), The method taken
We year of including part of the creek
improvemlats in each year is an excellent step
forward. If the project is started at its lower
end (Mingo Road) and designed upstream, the
construction of more thin :1,000,000 a year
would be difficult anyway. please give this
project as high a ranking as possible to help
relieve the flooding that residents on Cooper
Creek and its,major tributaries are starting to
{ experience` regularly. 4
't Construction would start at the Mingo Road D
j Bridge' and sun northwest to Old North Road. it
will also be necessary to rebuild the railroad
bridge to some degree if costs allow. The exact gram"
limits would have to be determined after an f
engineer study and cost estimates.
1• V•
r
A
.
Mf"CT EEC AND ktJ%iKR
Airfield Lighting Coat: 12500000
RESpO►gMlg OEPARTYENT AND DIVISION
P4%ltc Works/Airport
PftOJECT NAARATIVE
LOCATION MAP
The airfield lighting program to requested to
provide runway lights for the new runway, and to
install taxiway edge lights on existing and new
taxiways. Presently, the airport has no taxiway
edge lights running full length. Additionally,
approach lights ant replacement of existing runway
lights, the construotton of a power vault and
control system, wduld all enhance the airport
tacilittes and provide for a eater airport and
present a more conducive posture to attracting
aircraft and aviation rolated industry to the Denton
`Airport. The runway lights installation to in
aooordance with the Airport Maeter Plan. The F.A.A.
%All provide 901E matching funds on most of these ~a T
project..
s~
N
i• NCMfIY WI►
j 1663j/3 R
Y
9
3
PIIDACT TITLE AND NUMKN
Runway-TaxLway Extension$ Cost: 5315,500
.
KSPONSIKE OEPARTYENT AND DIVISION
Public Works/Airport
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP
Thh extension of runway 17/35 from 5,000 ft. to
60(100 ft., which is in accordance with the Airport
Ykuter Plan, would peratt the airport to attract air
cai?rior type aircraft such as the B-737 and DC-9.
Thu aircraft require longer runways, and would use
Denton Airport for charters, air freight operations
r, 'sn'i aircraft overhadl facilities. Additionally, a
6,000 ft. runway would assist the airport in
attracting corporate aircraft to not only base ocrTla~
y aircraft at Denton, but to use the airport. A
'j longer runway to oonsidered a safety margin by some
of the larger business related aircraft. The P.A.A.
will provide 90% matching funds on most of these
pt'o3eote. ~ T
I~
t~
C WftTY MAID
A
E 16635/1 I
I
a
r
, 1
FWACT TITLE AND NV11W,
Utility Runway and Taxiway Construction Cost: 0200,000
.
RESMNSOLE DEPARTMEMT'IND DIVISION
Public Yorke/Airport
PROJECT NARRA.:'.VE LOCATION MAP
In accordance with Y.A.A. guidelines, once a runway
has reached (60) percent of maximum runway capacity,
which is 190,000 operations for the single runway at
j Denton Municipal Airport, steps should be initiated
to construct an additional runway. In a recent study
completed by the Texas Aeronautics Commission in
;1986, Denton Airport'was conducting 1630140 aircraft
operations ocKro~
year, or (86) percent of total capa-
per p Y
city, By constructing the additional utility runway,
WRII35L) and associated taoilitiei, Denton Municipal
Airport would not only meet the demend for runway
slots, but open up the west side of the airport for u~
' additional aeronautical and industrial development.
The Bove to the west aide of the airport with the
construction of the additional runway would enable
the City to offer for development 122 additional
acres' with taxiway frontage and/or access. This 122
Gores of lan4 could be utilised for an ixecutive Air
t Torednol/Airline terminal, parking lots, aviation N
related businesses an4 non-aviation industrial devil- I
op"rit, theme west side tracts of land would be
dbetrable to lease to industry wishing to locate in "C"7v W
Denton and close to the airport. This more `,o the
vest side of the airport is in accordance with the j
Airport Master Plans The F.A.A. will provide 90%
mtehiq funds on most of these projects.
16631/2
r
I ,
PARKS AND RECREATION
'Moo
Findoor/outdoor TITA AID IPJMKR
Swimming Pool
M[ AND DIVIS M
rks and Recreation Department
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP
The Denton Independent School District hopes to
develop an indoor 25 yard pool as a part of their
4new high school complek: If the DISD finds that I ,
they have enough funds to develop an indoor pool, I- -
we would use these funds to develop a 50 meter 1
j outdoor pool adjacent to the indoor pool facilit .
i• If the DISD does not have enough funds to build
the indoor pool, we would look at developing an
outdoor 50 meter pool complex at that or another
location in the community. The earmarked funds
} will allow for total funding at the school site
i because facilities developed for the indoor pool
can,also be used for tbo outdoor facility. If
an indoor pool is not developed at the school
site, additional funds would be necessary in the i J I
next`year of the CIP to help complete the pool J r
'j complex at either the high school or a park site.
' This swimming facility is critical due to the ,r
Iheavy uae'6f the Civic Center "ool. Die are at 7 ,
ut additional pool space, we will soon
TvlxJocertan mum use much of the time the pool is open,
a s,tart.turning people away from the pool
se maximums are reached. This will
ny residents to not have access to the i
• ot days, weekends, holidays, etc. A new
' ld be used in the next year or two, but l delaythe proje ct until 1991-92 which
or five years down the road. This will new pool in 1991-92, but it will
y a needed we a ore at time.
I
ear•r,rr,r+r-+•~_~...._.._._...,...
I
1
P XWW 717LE AND NUMBER
Bookmobile
RE3 3WLE DEPARTMHNT AND DIVIWON
Library Department I
PROJECT NARRATIVE
WRIT
functioning as a traveling branch, a
bookmeibile could offer public library ec•rvice to
mane people, from children to senior citizens,
' who otherwise are not able to visit the library.
fp The bookmobile would be self-contained with
no need for a specialloutaide power hookup. "
Public Library
l Diesel generator power could allow use of jD 4Den
exas
computer terminals for efficient book check-in hL A .1 it It ifiklm 20
and check-out Service. Staff needs would
Include a driver and one clerical. From time to R
ilk Igh
'time
,puppeteers could present programs.
Materials would be selected from the regular
1 collections by t
he profoeaional staff. Extra
copies of children's books and beet sellers
would be added from the start up money,
s'.
i.
PROJECT TITLE AND NUMBER
Second Aerial Device cost $500,000.00
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT AND OtYISION
Fire - Operations DivI$Ion
.
PRDJ E T NARRATIVE 0011AIT
The Denton Fire Department needs to place into ser-
vice a second company equipped with an elevating
ladder device for fighting fires and rescuing people
In hl-rise buildings. We are required by the State CF•600FAPS 85'
Board of Insurance to have one aerial per 35,000 MANOAM AAFMUCOM VU#Ca71M4
population. The Department only has one such unit
a 75 ft. snorkel acquired In 1974. We do not have
a riserve unit and the closest mutual-aid unit Is in
Lewisville. 1
The' City of Denton Is being assessed a penalty on a
Its Key Rate of 24 for failure to have a second unit.
There are also 98+ buildings of 3 or more floors In
height only 5 of which are sprinklered. O O O
The Fire Prevention Engineering Bureau of Texas
also recommended a second suc4 unit during its
1982 survey,
TM aa.ry Am Pu*00 M AwWw pe. Do rr bt Aaalput a arnAaN bwabawA *09*
{ bdmd sate cab.
d
M wow C004 CPO%
i r.1 ~ -wMrw"
w &A ~p~r~QPR~
{ Ed 4a~ ~ N Q~11~ "
' 1 two" NW V I.Mna~a4ra Arum, J!
1 a#~M Lam"
M D' j ANO*
-1 . she I,av LMw /m
\ N M
_ .............r,...~_..,.. .,....._....,......,.,twr+awYJMY'11;ih.+INti.`a.w,Nae...... _ ,
t
•IA 4v
l, l r
t
a~
~ l
PF"CT TITLE AND NUMBER
W lic Siren Warning System RESPONSNE DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION
-Coat !253,00
PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP
Public Siren Warning System. At least 5 large sirens - or 12-14 smaller sirens will be needed by 1991-92, --=L -
The larger sirens have a range of about 9,Q00 feet at
70 dB and the smaller, 40300 feet at 70 dB. The I,_II,
sirens ' coverage is shown to the right. The type of t W
siren used will be dependent upon emergency back-up1=
power and pupulation coverage, which may change. I n ,
tim ''~L' y- Ili -11CI1
The sirens, legally, must be operated from the
er enc ' i = ii Js. t J - >
g Y Operations Center at 215 B. McKinney Street.
Sirens are used to warnithe public of impending oi
disasters such as tornadoes,
• I \ : ti v,,it~ ~
4
-1 tT.r j 4
~~,.w....-_....-...«....~...,.._._............-.+w.._...w........ ....,...,.-we ~ A.:...:~8-i1'wp:aaTF+4A ..~..ea.r+mur '
r
s
a ,
MASTER CIP RANKING SHEET
PROJECTS REQUESTED 1985-87
ProJect Project Cummulative Rank
title Cost Total Rank order
TRANSPORTATION AND T S Intersection control algnaJs 225,000 225, 000 103.5
D 1
TRNf9PR1 AND T 4 Turn lit-as 4w arterials 90, 000 315,000 103.5 Z
DRAAINAGNAGE 14 iaoper Greek Channel - Improvements 4.4W.OW 4,715,000 102.5 3
DRAINALE 4 Kingfisher Street 15,u00 4,790,000 102.5 4
TRANSPORTATION AND T 16 four-lane divided road - Spencerto 1-35 10,625,000 15,415,000 100.0 5
DRAINAGE 15 Ranch Estates 1,315,000 16,790,000 99.8 6
TRANSPORTATION AND T 3 Match Branch Road - Hwy.'.SC, to 1-35 W 5,130,000 21,920,000 97.5 7
TRAIJSFOR1A110N AND 7 7 P~destrlan signals 30, OW 21,950,000 97.3 8
TRANSPORTATION AND T 2 Eagle Drive - Ball Ave. to 1-35 1,000,000 28,950,000 96.5 9
FIRE 2 Second aerial device 400,000 29,350,000 94.3 f0
AIRPORT 6 Water/sewer entonsion 2, 000, OW 31,350,000 94.0 ll
AIRPORT F %e FUNDS 3 Runway taxiway extension 250,000 31,600,000 q3.9 12
AIRPORT FR/. Fl1NDS 2 In H eld drainage improvements 100,000 31,700,000 93.8 13
AIRPORT FAH FUNDS 4 Airfield lighting 200,000 31,900,000 93.6 to
DRAINAGE 5 Old North Road - Nottingham 352,000 32,252,000 93.0 15
TRANSPORTAIION AND T 6 Controller upgrades - four intersections 60,000 32,312,000 92.5 16
TRANSPORTATION AND T 15 Site lane - widen Millowood to Gorman 1~1 I,70u,000 34,012,000 92.5 17
TRANSPORTATION AND T 13 Install signals - Ave. D 1-35E accesses IW,000 34,112,000 92.5 le
AIRPORT 8 keroute Underwood Road 50, 0>0 34,162,000 90.5 19
DRAINAGE 1 Tie Ector to MoIone 4 Cordell System 105,330 34,267,330 89.5 20
TRANSPORTATION AND T l7 Corbin bridge 66-3,800 34,913,130 e9.3 21
DRAINAGE 12 Myrtle Street Drainage 160,000 35,093,130 85.8 22
DRAINAGE 9 Cott Street 169,200 35,262,330 85.8 23
DRAINAGE 111 Hollyhill/Longrldge Drainage 500,000 33,762,330 85.8 24
'AIRPORT FAA FUNDS 5 Utility runway taxiway 160,000 33,922,330 65.5 25
AIRPORT FAA FUNDS I Aircraft parking erttenefon 200,000 36,122,330 85.5 26
. ` AIRPORT I EKOC term. road/parking /furnishings 350,000 36,472,330 83.5 27
DRAINAGE 13 Highland Park,1-35-400' No. of Willowwon 4u0,000 36,972,330 83.0 29
PARKS AND RECREIIIION 1 50 meter pool nc,OW 30,622,330 82.0 29.
a EMERGENCY MANAOEHENr t Outdoor emergency sirens 203,000 38,e25,330 79.8 30
TRANSPORTATION AND T' t Windsor Drly■ - Hinkle to Donnie brae 615,(010 39,450,330 19.3 31
DRAINAGE 6 Archer Trail - Emerson 21,700 39,472,030 78.3 32
DRAINAGE f0 McKinney St., channel 12W' downstream 200,000 39,672,030 78.3 33
_ ''.DRAINAGE 7 Duncan - Shady Oaks 300,OW 39,972,030 78.3 34
IRANBPORTATIUN AND T 21 Highland from Ave. C to Welch t5i,000 40,223,030 73.5 33
TRANSPOAtAIION AND T 19 Reconstruct Maple - Ave. D vast to Welch 375,000 40,599,030 72,3 36
AIRPORT 1I Terminal *%tension 300, OW 40,898,030 71.0 37
PARKS AND RECREATION 2 Athletic field dev 7W,00u 41,596,030 70.0 38
FIRE 1 Combine stations 1 4 7
1.000,000 42,596,030 70.0 39
DRAINAGE 3 Strickland drolnage 71,000 42,6b9,030 69.8 40
DRAINAGE 2 Dorman school drainage 93,000 42,762,030 69.8 41
LIBRARv 2 Bookwbile 200, OW 42,962,030 69.5 42
A]RPDAf 7 Road improvement - west side 137,000 43,099,030 66.5 43
AIAPORT 2 ATC control tower 50, OW 43,149,030 69,5 44
LIPRARY I Branch libraries 375,000 43,524,030 67.0 45
' . AIRPORT 3 Crash, fire, rescue vehlcte/buildlnq 250,000 43,774,0:.0 66.0 46
AIRPORT 9 Airfrefght terminal 500,000 44,274,030 64.0 47
._,..,........,;ae~ar:Jrlritd'r~aa~4:rov.nl i; J'd•,ww..w-.. , . ...-.....-r..~wr..w.w...__:
i
r
Sod
t
i
FRANSFORTA r1M ANU 1 22 Mulberry From Ave. D to Ave. D 137,500 44,431,530 63.0 48
FIRE 3 lrsining complex 3, OOV, OW 47,431,530 62.8 49
r RANEPOR I AT 1011 AND 1 23 Sycamore from Ave. U to IWO. C 116,7181 47,548,230 62.5 50
1 RANSPORI AI IUN AND 1' 19 Paving - Johnson and Smith streets 250,OOV 47,790,23V 61.5 51
DRAINAGE 9 Acme Prick retry, street 6 dralnagw imFr ISO,",Ki 47,948,230 61.3 52
TRANSPOR W ION AND 1 20 Ave. A from Prairie to Chestnut 52,501) 48,000,130 60.0 53
1NANSFOR1 Al ION AND T 10 Add Tans to Ave D, Wilshire S to 15.100 48,015,730 59.8 54
AIRPORT 10 So. end emery. road crash bridge 200,000 48,215,730 57.0 55
AIRPORT FAA FUNI?d 6 Land acquisition extension rurmay 20,000 48,235,730 56.0 56
AIRPORT 5 Maintenance building ISi., 000 48,383,730 52.3 57
AIRPORT 4 Airport equipment and vshtcls 40,OuO 46,425,730 51.5 58
AIRPMt FAA FUNDS 7 Extend runway 11 156,000 48,575,730 47.5 59
LIPRARY 3 Develop store-frnnt libraries 30, UW 48,625,730 46.0 60
TRANSPORTATION AND T 14 Install signogo syst.jil Dr/Carroll tilvd 48,625,730 43.0 61
AIRPGRt 13 Curb/gutter improvements - SE cnrner ''Wov, 000 48.825,730 31.5 62
AIRPORT 12 Underground electric - SL curner 1u0, 000 48,925,730 31.5 63
1 RANSPORI AI ION ANU I 8 L'xtend Ave. E So. k E. - Join Ave. D l"•8,504 49,064,234 23.0 64
TRANSPORTATION AND T 1i Sec. Prterials - Bernard, Mulberry. Welt I, 660, 000 50,724,234 8.0 65 s
1RANSPORIAIION AND 1 9 Improve/widen Wilshire St - Ave U to L 136,350 50,860,584 S.0 66
PARKS AND RECREAFION 4 Lighting at Denton high school lso,000 51,010,584 0.0 67 1
1RANSPORIATION AND T 12 Reconstruct Maple pay. 6 curb. Ave UlWel 315,000 51,:185,584 0.0 68
PARKS AND PECREA11ON 3 School dist/city indoor pool-lutr school 1,500,000 52,885,584 0.0 69
GRAND IUJAL 52,8135,584
l
i
I
t
• 1
100
s '
{~s + P s
Iii Y ~I I
5. ,
i
sommomm~
SAMPLE RANKING FORM
CxMjI1T 6 OENTON CAPITAL IMP10VMNT PROJECT RATING FORM `.r
BUDGET YEAR 1987-92
' ' A_e~ues_ttnDaarlmeatt marnsncv innoe an _
rrolect Titles Siren Public Varnine 9votam 1
I CRITERIA i ITEM
SCOA
I IEIGMT I TOTAII
i I, Win (OTHER THAN 2-4) I
I 2 Serious, lassellatm identified mead
I 1 Moderate identified need i 2 i 7,6 1 15 I
0 Low gr A. Iffed new
2, PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY
2 Addressee a major health or safety hazard
I i I I
1 Addresses a alsor health or safety hazard I 2 I e I 12 I
I 0 All other aralaete I I i
3. LEGALLY IEQUTAED j I I I
2 Required to .eat 14,941 regulations
I 0111 wt Intlcipated legal ttquiraats i 2 I 3.8 7
I 0 All other projects I I
a. COMPLETES A PROJECT 1 1 I I
3 AJgWnd to make usable A major public improvement
2 Needed to co•plate an already useable public improvement i 3 I 3.5 I 10.5 i I
1 Adds too e4,meta, •nhane
o mac4,o1•ted program
i i I I
0 A11 other orolacts I
S, ADWSSES NEED
2 Prajaet highly effective and efficient 2 S 10
1 fraloct moderately affective and efficient
0 Project low effectiveness and efflcienev I 1 I
a, RELATIONSHIP TO PLANS/POLICIES
I I I I
1 ^V- 2 Clearly advances plans and policies I I I (
1 Doesn't conflict with plans and pollclea 2
I I ~.S 1 1151
0_ Conflicts with olsns and 9011000,
I I 1
s 1. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT
'x 2 Overall positive effects I I I I
1 Little or no effete j z j s j 10 j
0Oyerall neOaHve iffects I ! I 1
GCNEAAL BUDGET IMPACT
2 Returns investment or more than investment I
1.6 Reduces or avoids subsequent costs I i I
- 1.0 Little or no net impact on subsequat costs (under 110,000 per yr.1 ( 1.5 I 7.1 ° I 11.25
.8 Moderate not impact (under X60,000 per yr.l j
0 Nigh mat imaet lund•r iS0.000 4,r yr M
0. MOTOR VEHICLE UTItI2ATIO4
y 1 2 Results in *cememiea of Cry's motor vehicle use I I I
k s 1 No Impact I 2 I 1 I 2
Tncraa•s CMASTEell gRf C/LAH1tv'1 meter vehicle use 1 I I
„ F 10. COINCIDE; KITH
2 Coincides
I No impact
2 I 2.5
I 5 ~
{}t Q_tonflleta i I I
fl. QUALITY OF INFOAMMTION ~I f
2 Complete And Accurate
i Incoglets
2 3 6 j
0 Yery little. 11000,
I I i
air TOTAL SCOAE I 1 I 99.1
a _AANN IwithfIs Deamsrntl I I i I
f
i
FIVE YEAR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDING SCHEDULE
FOR THE CITY OF DENTON
1986-1987
Lillian Miller Parkway Widening 4500000
Turn Lanes 230,000
Upgrade Traffic Signals at Carroll Boulevard
ti and University Drive 1700000
New Signal Installations 145,000 f
Signal at Loop 288 and U.S. 380 64,000
Traffic Study 25,000
Evers Park Sidewalk 400000
o Sidewalk on Hercules 1S1000 I
Taylor Park Drainage 3000000
Woodrow Bridge 2509000
i
Pecan Creek Drainage 110,000
Audra Lane Drainage 90,000
Burning Tree Drainage 64,000
Stuart/Selene Drainage 50,000
Study Drainage Regulations 2S9OOO
2
,~*adw r'° Animal Control Center Expansion ISS9000
East Recreation Center 191000000
Athletic Field Development 50,000
TOTAL $5,46300016
i
+ F, 1987-1988
K Woodrow Lane Widening and Improvements s S251000
Rebuild Existing Bell Avenue
qti (with present alignment) 4506000
Mingo Road Traffic and Drainage Improvements 2501000
Teasley Lane Improvements 2000000
r., = Traffic Signal Synchronization 750000
Traffic Signals _ 25,000
3 YX Willow Springs Drainage 337,000
+Y~ Malone Street Drainage 2500000
Burning Tree Bridge 1509000
y , Teasley Lane Drainage 501000
41 Senior Center Expansion 7500000
r. Athletic Field Development SS0,000
TOTAL
T3,'dTi;=
f
^a ,
t.
CIP
Funding Schedule
Page 2 1988-89
F.M. 2181 (Teasley Lane); Four Lane Divided
DavFirsomStIrHe-e3tSEPaSvoiuth to Ryan Road
Improvements
Avenue E Improvements (Eagle Drive to s 2S0,000
IH-35 Service Road) 500000
40,000
Update Master Drainage Plan
Fire Station 425,000 '
Fire Equipment 500,000
Recreation Center 200'000
Athletic Field Development 1,300,000
25
0 0,000
Library Expansion, Phase 1
` A400, 000
Plans for Law Enforcement Center/Court Complex
200000
TOTAL ' s
E r , ; ,61 ,00 .
1989-1990
Loop 288/Local Participation: Four Lane Divided U.S. 380 South to Colorado Boulevard U.S. 380/Local Participation: 529200,000
From U.S, 77 (Locust) to Loop28g Lane Divided
a i S
Expansion of Nottingham (From U.S. 380 to 6000000
Mingo Road) 3 .r
U.S. 380 Right-of-May Acquisition 5000000
250,000 ,
Loma Del Rey Drainage
Stuart/Sunnydale Drainage 6251000
Drainage Improvements In Holly !:ill Area
f 350,000
300
Law Enforcement Center/Court Complex, Phase I ,000
S000000
TOTAL
v r ' i JI
5 '
a.
,yy
IJ
1
r
r
/ CIP Funding Schedule
Page 3
1190-1991
Fort Worth Drive (U.S, 377); Four Lane Divided
From 1H-35E to F.M. 1830
Reconstruction of Oriole Street 51,065,000
117,000
Fort Worth Drive/James
Street Drainage
Recreation Center 909000
Athletic Field Development 1,4000000
450,000
Completion
of
Library Expansion
r Completion of Law Enforcement Center/ 6G^,070
Court Complex
TOTAL 13900,000
,0 o
a t fi• ar,
? ~y
~ , X15 I
b f Y 'Y2.~ J i
1 ,d
f P~ 1
~ Y I lr
I: OS34x"s
? ab
2/17/87
4 y
4
G ti 1+~ y ~ ,ray,
o Y
}
d ~
k~ 9 f A : Yin
1 \
t y
6 ~~•rry
Y
' ..a.W LI.. x.YM _ a,.f ':.1 . . Y lu. ~ i•r, r w.uv/aM~~, r
{t
.Y '
1
1 p
1
P 6 Minutes
May 13, 1987
Fage S
Ns. Brock moved to recommend approval of the preliminary
plat of the Gigliotti Addition, Lot 19 block 1 and that
Metro Street be deslgnatea as a collector street,
therefore sidewalks will be required.
Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and motion unanimously carried
C. A-48. Proposed annexation of approximately 69.1694 accts
beTn9 part of the S. Venter Survey, Abstract No. 1315; C.
Chacon Surveyy, Abstract No. 298; J. Baker Survey, Abstract
No. 47; J. Dickson Survey, Abstract No. 342; and the A.
Cannon Survey, Abstract No. 232 and located adjacent and
south of FM 2181 and east of Ull Alton Road.
STAFF REPURI: Ms. Carson stated that this is a proposed
annexation of approximately 69.1694 acres located along
FM 2181 and consists of a ZSU foot strip and inclusion of
Skyfab Addition. After discussion with the City Council
in October 1986, the Council requested that the staff begin
the annexation process but allow time for the completion
of the plat. A variance of the Subdlvleion Regulations
concerning fire flow was requested and was approved by
the Planning and Zoning Commission since in existing water
f line was located along FN 2181. She said that the beauti-
fication 'task Force has identified FM 2181 as a major
entranceway into the City of Denton. She said that with
this annexation the City would have some control over the
land uses in the area and possible development. Some
opposition has been expressed but the City Council has
chosen to proceed. Completion of this annexation is
scheduled for July 7.
Mr. Claiborne asked if Skyfab would be a legal nonconform-
Ing use. Ms. Carson said that if the property has a struc-
ture when annexed the use would be a legal non contorming
use and added that the business would have to be operating.
She said that if no structure exists at completion of the
t4 annexation the owners would have to get proper toning
before building.
a DIC ISION : his. Brock moved to recommend approval of A-48.
aeon a by Mr. tai.-man and notion unanimously carried
r_ (6.0).
I IV. Adjourn to a work session In the Civil Defense Room to receive
staff input on the Capital Improvement Program and develop a II
recommendation to the City Council, f
Mr. Ellison stated that when the Executive Committee ranked
3 the proposed projects they looked at the growth in the area
and the actual needs. He said that the Executive Committee's
-r - ranking of the projects has been submitted to the Planning and
Zoning Commission f7bT Its consideration. He stated that staff i
is here to justify their priority rankings and answer
questions.
Mr. McGrane stated that the staff is trying to at away from
the financial aspects of the program and staff [eels that the
tanking sysc -.m wl11 prcvEde an outlet. He stated that staff
,r assessed growth In the next five years at an 81 growth rate
and with this collections will bran in ,gS,BUU 9U0. He said
that the current debt service in 1912 will be ;Sr100,000. he
stated that the difference is not great but !
if the groath rate
Is smaller and the program has been authorized, the Commission
can go back to the ranking system and make ote:er decisions.
,
Roland Laney, Chairman of the Public Utilities board, stated
that the Commission considers a Capital Improvemen,; Program
for utilities. He added that they do not depend rn tax money
P 6 2 Mirutes
May 13, 1987
Page 6
to fund the utilities program. he said that they follow a
general ranking system. He said that the Utility Capital
Improvement Program is divided into two categories; 1)
capital projects that enhance the entire utility system, and
2) projects that are directed at areas of growth.
Mr. Nelson explained and showed major electric, water and
sewer projects. He said that not all of the projects are
capital impproveaent projects and that some of the projects are
repairs. he added that they also are hoping for state loan
availability, he said that the purchase water cost sill
decrease dramatically when Lake Ray Roberts is on line. He
said that there is a chance that bonds will have to be sold In
1988.
4r. Ellison stated that the Plau.ning and Zoning Commission
will take action on the Utility Capital Improvement Program at
Its next meeting.
i MrrLeBrinnkman stated that the last bond issue passed by the
€ approved recreation centers and athletic fields. He
said that these projects are really needed. he said that the
1991.92 request is for an indoor/outdoor pool. he said that
the existin
will have tg pool Is
turn overcrowded and is possible that they
people away in the future. he said that
there are a few optlons or. where to put a pool facility but
felt that the facility is critical to the community.
' Gilbert Bernstein, D1SD, stated that lie felt there is addi-
tional need for a pool in bentoti and would like to see it
added in the area of new high school on McKinney Street.
Ray McFarlane NTSU
jests and that the stad that
were preliminarytbecausertheyrare
currently working on a major ■asterplan. he sold that next
year they would have a more thought out program.
<I Fir. Cook stated that the aerial device is the most critical
because of the safety factor and the Fact that the insurance
rates would decrease. he added that as Denton reaches certain
r population levels that aerial devices are required.
Mr. Svehla stated that equipment is not normally a C1P item
cj but that this piece of equipment is critical.
hr. Litman stated that the current emergency warning system
onlyy alerts 131 of the cit ,
of Etve big sirens and oneysmall ilrentlocatedhat firew system
stations and city facilities that 931 of the city would be
alerted to bad weather situations.
Mr. Claiborne asked about buying the system a little bit at a
time. Mr. Litman slated that it would cost more money because
packages are less expensive. Mr. Claiborne stated that he
r» w
ould like the figures of purchasing the system over a period
of year.
Mr. Clark explained and showed the projects on a map in
regards to traffic/streets/drainage.
Mr. Claiborne asked about the effects of having a road t'rem
f Spencer hood to Mayhill Interchange of Loop 2bb to connect the
+ i pp
loo to 1-35. Mr. Clark stated that it would be quick trip to
s T and would take a lot of the traffic oft the internal
x Ms. Corson stated that the Land Use Planning Committee has
identified this area as one of the four major activity centers
and the Committee does encourage that all major activity
centers have good accessibility.
1
i
' 4.
i
I
P 8 Z Minutes
May 13, 1937
Page 7
Mr. Svehla stated that he felt this road is a necessity in
this case.
Mr. Clark explained that the Masch Branch Road extension was
ranked as a priority by the Executive Committee but due to the
cost the Executive Committee requested that phases be deter- f
mined. Staff suggested four phases as followst University
Drive to Jim Christal Road Jim Christal Road to Airport Road,
Airport Road to Spring Roaa, and Spring Road to i-3!. E
Ms. Carson stated that intent 1s to establish the airport area
as a major industrial area and the Land Use planning Committee
listed this road as a high or the hiphost priority and for PM
2449 to tie into Masch Branch Road so that the empAesls from
1-3S would be on the airport. Mr. Clark stated that this road
could not be constructed In one year and the phase construction
is the best way to proceed. f~f
Mr. Bowling stated that the sooner the Improvements can be j
made to the airport the better. he said that the Federal
Aviation Committee is willing to pay 9U1 if the city pays i[
101. He explained the projects.
Nit. Svehla stated that the Executive l.ommi}tee ranked the
airport projects high because of the 9u-10 program.
Ms. Carson stated that several businesses, associations, and
organi:atfons nave asked for signs from the city to direct
them to the downtown area, colleges, etc.
She sale that they
'i are currently getting cost estimates from the Engineering
Department, ;:je said that they had considered putting in CiP
but are now considering contributions If the cost for the
t rTo signs is reasonable.
A11 c^mmission members agreed to have another work Session
after the May 27, 1987 regular meeting.
lr A Meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
q 1/S Ya..
v ~ 1
• 4
1
~y f
It Et
' 4`
, i
1'r
?fit V
a
i
Minut
Planning and Toni , Commission
May 27, 1987
The regular meeting of the planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, May 27, 1987, ■t 5100
p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
1
Present: Euline Brock, Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr.,
Ivan Glasscock and Judd Holt
Absent; William aamman
present from Staff: Elltabeth Evans, Planning Administrator; Denise
Spivey, Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Rick
Svehla, De uty city Manager and Executive Director for
Public Works; Robert Nelson, Executive Director for
Utilities; John McGrana, Executive Director for Finance,
Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorneyl David Ellison,
Assistant to the City Mans. {or; John Cook, Fire Chief;
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation; Jerry
Clark, City Engineer; Ross Litman, EmergenChM anagement
Coordinator; David Salmon, Civil Engineer, ini
Sundaramoor thy, Civil Enginee rI and Susan Mitchell,
Secretary
Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order.
1. MINUTES: Mr. Claiborne stated that on page 4, paragraph 7,
ttTe Erst sentence should read... "Mr. Claiborne stated that
in an area of light industrial a residential street classi-
fication would not be applicable."
Mr. Claiborne stated that on page 60 paragraph 12, the first
sentence should read... "Mr. Claiborne asked about the effects
of having a road from Spencer Road to the Mayhill interchange
of Loop 288 to connect the loop to t-35.11
It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconde6 by Ms. Cole and
unanimously carried (S-U) to appprove the minutes of the
regular meeting of May 13, 1987 as corrected.
11. MAKE A RECUlWENUATIOh TO ThE CI71 COUNCIL ON TkE U11L1'IY
STAFF kEPORTs Mr. Nelson stated that the Public Utilities
oar as recommended approval of the Utility Capital Improve-
tents Plan and the plan was expplained to the Commission at the
last study session. He said chat he was available to answer
r, Questions. i
DECISIONS It was moved by Mr, Claiborne, seconded by !
I r.Escue and unanimously carried (5.0) to recommend ap-
proval of the Utility capital Improvements Plan.
Mr. Holt arrived at the meeting.
11L. PUBLIC HEAAIN6S
A. S-1$3. Petition of Cross Timbers Girl Scout Council
requesting a specific use permit in an agricultural (A)
E coning district on a S./ acre tract located at 1000 Kest
I University Drive (U.S. Highway 310). The property is
further described as Lot 61 Block E Ranch Estates Sub-
division. This property is currently the site o' an
abandoned veterinary clinic. if approved, the specific
use permit will allow the utiicatlon of the existing
structure for use to the office/headquarters of the
Lross Timbers Girl Scout Council.
Six notices were mailed to propertyy owners within 20U
feetl one re 1 fora was tecelvod in favor, no reply forms
were received in opposition,
P 6 e Minutes
May 27, 1987
Page 5
Mr. Woh ham asked if there was any recourse. Mr. Claiborne
said deed restrictions are enforced through civil court and
toning is approved by the city Council.
Ray Roberts, 2224 Pembrooke, stated that he was not notified
when the property was going to be platted.
Mr. Claiborne stated that notification is not required on a
plat.
DECISION; Mr. Holt moved to approve the final plat of the
WETtney Park Addition, Lots 1-24, Black A, and Lots 1-7, block
B. Seconded by Ms. Cole and motion unanimously carried (6-0).
V. NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Claiborne asked the Commission if a joint meeting With
the Traffic Safety Commission on the 24th of June would be
acceptable. t
All members concurred.
0
VI.~ ADJUUkN TO A WORM SESSION TO SELECT RECOMMENDED PROJECTS AND
STAFF REPURTo Mr. Ellison stated that the Commission heeded
to se ect projects for the 1991.92 Capital Improvements Plan.
He said that the Executive Group and staff has recommended a
$5,536,250 program for 1991-92. He said that the Commission
can make its formal recommendation now, or can wait until the
e June luth meeting. He said that the problem the staff has
with June 10th is June 16th is the last City Council meeting
that this item can be put nn to meet the July 1st deadline.
Mr. Claiborne asked that with the remaining tour years of C I P
,i would there be any surplus, W. Svehla said there is a con-
cern about getting through the program because of the laws
that have changed In regards to seliiny the bonds and no
surplus is expected.
r Mr. Claiborne stated that he felt that projects like the
airport could be accelerated because of the 9u-10 funding, i
Mr. Svehla stated that these projects could be taken to the
1991 Committee and the City Council if the money became
available from the State for these projects so they could
possibly be done sooner.
Mr. Claiborne stated that the qyuestion is what amount of money
is justified for capital eayyenditures. Mr. Holt stated that a
- lot more money is needed. Ms. Brock stated that she did not
know how the Commission could justify less than $5.5 million
because of the needs.
Ms. Brock asked if the staff knew if the 90-10 money would be
available from the FAA for the airport. Mr. Svehla stated
that it Is hard to say but there is a good chance next yo-ar.
He said that offers could be made before 1991,
Ms. Brock asked if approved and the money becomes available two
years from now how would it be handled by the city, Mr. Svehla
stated that it would be taken to the 91 Committee and the re-
commendationwould be forwarded to the Council, 1
Mr. Claiborne asked if the Commissioners had recommendations. 1
Mr. Halt recommended that the pool be included in the CIP for
1991.92,
Ms, Cole recommended that the emergency sirens be included in
the CIP for 1991.92.
P 6 & Minutes
May 27, 1987
Page 6
Ms. Brock stated that she encouraged a development of a master
plan for bike trails and pedestrian safety for a future CIP
and would need to involve the traffic and parks and recreation
departments. She recommended that a bookmobile system be
included in the 1991.92 CIP.
Mr. Holt stated that he looks for the things that add to qual-
ity of life that one can see like the pool and bookmobile. He
said that he is a little skeptical about airport improvements
being in the 1991.1992 CIP.
Ms. Brock stated that if Denton wants to be an employer In the
long run the airport improvements and Masch Branch Road needed
to be done. She added that the people would see this in the
long run.
Mr. Claiborne stated that because of the major Industr in the
airport area he feels that any improvement mould be a ~ene£it
In this area.
Mr. Holt felt that more people would identify with the Spencer
bypass.
Ms. Carson stated that the priority with the Land Use Planning
Committee Is the Masch Branch Road Improvements. She said
that the Committee wants to entourage industrial growth around
a the airport and development in the airport area would support
balanced growth for all areas of the city.
Ms. Brock stated that to attract the industry to this area
road access around the airport Is necess.ry.
Mr. Claiborne stated that Spencer Road to 1-3S will encourage
developers to build another Golden Triangla Mall or Lakeview
type development. He stated that Masch branch Road could be
considered separately or considered as part of the CIF.
Mr. Escue stated that he recommended Masch branch Road
improvements but not the bypass.
DECISION: Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend the following
project s for the 1591-92 Capital improvements Program.-
Project Category Cost f
Intersection Control Signals Streets 6 Traffic S 22S,000
Turn Lanes for Arterials Streets A Traffic 90,000
kingfisher Drainage Drainage 75,000
- Masch Branch Road (Phase I)
360 to Jim Chris1§1 Streets 6 Traffic 573,125
4+ ,
Masch Branch Road (Phase 11)
Jim Chrlstal to ISIS Streets 6 Traffic 165046931
Airfield Lighting Airport Improvements 2SO,000
Runway Taxiway Extension Airport improvements 312, Soo
Utility Runway Taxiway Airport Improvements 200,000
1
Pedestrian Signals Streets 6 Traffic 30,000
Cooper Creek Channel Drainage 10000 000
50 Meter Indoor/outdoor Pool Parks 4 Recreation 1,000,400
P b 2 Minutes
May 27, 1987
Page 7
Second Aerial Device Fire 500,000
0utdnor Emergency Siren Emergency Management 253,750
BookmcAlle Library
250,000
TOTAL 66,264,306
Iecond-d by Mr. Holt and motion unanimously carrLed (6-0).
Meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. N
i '
.j ,
»Y
t, 't,J r,
,t
t r.
t
~y a
r
i
S
j et d t
t t
4V q r
%
,6 r
S /5
r
M1J W♦ ~ 51
W
I k
rE I /
P
a
4
F
i
•y
FILE
F
151'
~ ~ S i