The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-21-1987 1 5. AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 21, 1987 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 21, 1987, at 5:15 ~.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items 14111 be considered: Note: aAny lso item be considered as Agenda part ofr tthe Work he Agendas for the Regular Meeting. 5:15 P.M. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V, .T.S. 1. Hold a discussion on Maverick vs, the City of Denton. * 4' B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252.17 ; p'•` Y ATS MJ.'°kM1 M1y, li , C. Personrel/Hoard Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), + r Art 6252-17 V.A.T. , Hold a discussion regarding a propc.;ed resolution 2. adopting a Management Supervision Pay Plan Review. 34 ker.eiv6 an overview of the drainage requirements. l u e 6:30 p.m. 1. Receive an update on the Main Street Project and a request for budget funding fo tho project. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 21, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be 1~ - 5"':d M1 considered: t 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular session of June 16, 1987. 2, Presentation of Beautification Awards. ark p y a,. , q n 4. { r City of Denton City Council Agenda 5 July 21, 1987 Page 2 3, Consider a request from the Firefighters Association { to solicit funds from various City street corners. 4. Public Hearings A. Consider a petition of Carter and Burgess, Inc., representing Miller of Texas, requesting annexation of 73.334 acres of land being (pAart3)of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417. B. Consider a petition of Carter and Burgess, Inc., representing Miller of Texas, requas'.ing annexation of 2.822 acres of land being ppart of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, to-44) C. Consider a petition of Miller of Texas requesting annexation of 1.834 acres of land being ppart of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330. el -4S) S. Consent Agenda " Each of thesf: items is recommended by the Staff and 12 i approval thereof ,.till be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the ' V City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed blow are bids and purchase orders to be approved for ayment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda item b.A). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item +j prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid 19762 - Envelopes i't;'•. 2. Bid 19765 - Wire and Cable-Warehouse Stock B. Plats and Replats 1. Consider approval of preliminary and final replat of Lots 4.7, Block A, of the Golden b Triangle Mini-Mall Addition. (The Planning ,a and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) .'3 C. Tax Refunds 1. Consider approval of a tax refund to First Gibraltar Mortgage in the amount of $S21.11 r-. i City of Denton City Council Agenda d July 21, 1987 Page 3 2, Consider approval of a tax refund for James R. Neblett in the amount of $657,59. 3. Consider approval of a tax refund for Cl•tire's Boutique in the amount of $944,00. D. Contracts 1. Consider approval of an annual maintenance agreement with American Management Systems Inc. on Financial System known as "LGFS". 2. Consider approval of an annual agreement with Control Data Corporation for software maintenance on Payroll/Personnel System known as "EIS". 6. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, " , ( 1 equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Article I of Chapter 17 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas ("Plumbing Code") to provide for adoption of the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code; adoption of amendments to the Uniform Plumbing Code; to provide for additions thereto; and repealing all ordinances in conflict herewith. C, Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and vacating a 6 foot portion of a utility easement located on Lot 4, 3lock A, of the JVS Addition, Phase I. (E-1) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving Deloitte Haskins A Sells to begin an audit of the , fiscal year ending September 30, 1986, e, 74 Resolutions s J. A. Consider approval of a resolution adopting a Management Supervision Pay Plan Review. 4. Consider a motion authorizing the Aerobatics ' 4. ' t International use of the Renton Airport for an air show September 7, 1987. ; f.. t. City of Denton City Council Agenda July 21, 1987 E Page 4 9, Receive a report from Mr. Carl Young regarding traffic problems in Denton and the annual Easter egg hunt, 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 11. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 12. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. a'n 13, Executive Session: s A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252.17 V.A.T.S. 1. Discuss authorization for retention of counsel in the County vs. City lawsuit. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Personnel/Board Apppointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I F I C A T E b ,J I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the t1 bulletin at the Ci H 1 of 19B7Caiy ~ePton, oTclcck w on the day of s U h~ ,f i ~ 2707C + JV` w i XI ,'~s Y'.. a n:-.c .n..a Ni.4.kY n.11MVw..1`y nlY..y,:♦ : ti y i i a AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 21, 1987 i ; Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, i s July 213 1987, at 5:15 p.m. in the civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: Note: Any item listed on the Agenda ofr tthe he WoAgenda rk S s Eorn the also be considered as pa Regular Meeting. 5:15 P.M. Executive Session: A. Le al Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252.17 VTT.S. on Maverick vs. the City discussion Hold a of Denton. ` B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252.17 i~ V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Apppointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252.17 V.A.T.S. 2. Hold a discussion regarding a proposed resolution adopting a Management Supervision Pay Plan Review. 3, Receive an overview of the drainage requirements. i' 6:39 p.m. 1. Receive an update on the Main Street Project and a request for budget funding for the project. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 21, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the j MunicipalBuilding at which the following items will be i3 considered. 7:00 p.m. i Consider approval of the minutes of the regular lsession of June 16, 1987. Presentation of Beautification Awards. ~rw*n . City of Denton City Council Agenda July 21, 1987 Page 2 3. Consider a request from the Firefighters Association i to solicit funds from various City street corners, r 4. Public Hearings r A, Consider a petition of Carter and Burgess, Inc., representing Miller of Texas, requesting ! annexation of 73,334 acres of land being part of I6 the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417. (A-43) B. Consider a petition of Carter and Burgess, Inc., representing Miller of Texas, requesting annexation of 2.822 acres of land being part of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, (A-44) C. Consider a petition of Miller of Texas requesting annexation of 1.834 acres of land being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330. A-45) Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in r^ accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up lnfor',iation is attached to the ordinances (Agenda item 6, A). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid 19762 - Envelopes 2. Bid 19765 - Wire and Cable-Warehouse Stock B. Plats and Replats 1. Consider approval of preliminary and final replat of Lots 4-7, Block A, of the Golden Triangle Mini-Mall Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) E C. Tax Refunds 1 1. Consider approval of a tax refund to First ;1 Gibraltar Mortgage in the amount of $521.11 City of Denton City Council Agenda i July 21, 1987 Page 3 { 2, Consider approval of a tax refund for James i w R. Neblett in the amount of $657.59. 5 3. Consider approval of a tax refund for R Claire's Boutique in the amount of $944.00. D. Contracts f. 1. Consider approval of an annual maintenance agreement with American Management Systems Inc. on Financial System known as "LGFS". 2. Consider approval of an annual agreement with Control Data Corporation for software " maintenancElS~~on Payroll/Personnel System known as 6. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Article I of Chapter 17 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas ("Plumbing Code") to provide for adoption of the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code; adoption of amendments to the Uniform Plumbing Code; to provide for additions thereto; and repealing all ordinances in conflict herewith. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and vacating a 6 foot portion of a utility easement located on Lot 4, Block A, of the JVS Addition, Phase 1. (E-1) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving Deloitte Haskins 6 Sells to begin an audit of the fiscal year ending September 30, 1986. 7, Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution adopting a Management Stopervision Pay Plan Review. 8. Consider a motion authorizing the Aerobatics International use of the Denton Airport for an air sh.jw September 7, 1987. . City of Denton City Council Agenda July 21, 1987 Page 4 4, Receive a report from Mr. Carl Young regarding traffic problems in Denton and the annual Easter egg hunt, 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 11. Official Action on Executive Session Items: f A. Legal Matters ! B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 12. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. ; 13. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Discuss authorization for retention of counsel in the County vs, City lawsdit. ?B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252.17 r. V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Apppointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. ' C E R T I F I C A T E 1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, r. on the day of , 1987 at o'clock (alms) p,m. CITY SVCRETARY r 2707C ~M M r,~.4 W .a C P3 CIN CUKIL RFIMT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRCM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager DATE: July 21, 1987 y ~I SLB=: Management/Supervision* Compensation Review 3 RE034OMTICN: In January 1987, the City Council authorized a contract agreement with management consultants from \rtFur- Young, Inc. to review the k management/supervision job evaluation/car, nation program In June 1987, Arthur Young, Inc. completed the review and submitted a 21nal report with reccmmendations. This request proposes the adoption of their report and reoommerdations. SlirtSARY: In the report, Arthur Young identifies areas for improvement in the job evaluation and pay determination practices and reoommends the following: o Implementation of a new pay plan structure o New job evaluation system - Decision Band Method o (luidelines for administering and streamlining the salary survey process , o Procedures for administering and maintaining the system Additionally, 1st year costs are detailed and costs for subsequent years through 1988/89 are estimated. This information is detailed under the "fiscal impact" section of this dooLnent. The benefits of the proposed plan include: o Provides inanbents opportunity for upward movement beyond existing range maximums (as warranted by employee performance) o Increases the City's ability to attract And retain qualified personnel for positions c o Reduces salary compression o Establishes a pay philosophy for the Management/ ~r ? Supervision job family *1he Fanagement/Supervision job family includes first line supervisors and middle managers. 4 ~r f q City Council Report Page 2 o Market pay considerations can be determined s independent of the evaluation process : o More reliable evaluation in that DLM focuses r primarily on work content while incorporating the Cityty's current factors into the evaluation process witfa less emphasis on minimum job qualifications BACK(RCLVD: Like other plans, the Management/SUpervis ion Pay Plan was adopted in 1978 and had not been reviewed since its Implementation. Ttrugh the entire compensation program was due for review in 1983, fund3 were limited. And in 1986, the City could only afford to rea®end a review of one plan. Since the greatest need was identified in the Management/9 tpervis ion job family, the proposal " was presented to overhaul that plan first. As a part of the 1986/87 compensation package, the City Council vested to approve our proposal to overhaul the Management/Supervision Pay Plan. DRAG RAhS , DUARIM MS CR GROUPS AFf'E:=: This program spans the orgar._zetion and directly impacts the following departments: Utilities Finance Public Works Parks and Recreation ' Community Services Data Processing Fire FISCAL IMPACT: Implementation Costs w . General Fund Other Rands Total Q10 year 1 j r` r. ~ f i i . City Council Report Page 3 Implementation Costs with Benefits General Fund Other Funds Total sI [ r 1 '9903 1 29 year _ IY l11_ Respectfully submitted: c•. ( y L o rre - Prepared by: City Manager Umu*dr", Irvin Personnel Analyst/Trainer Y ' V 1 as W', 4 Jf i~ t • ector Perr8onnel/Boployee Relations w L' ,I % j t n r 4050P 071587:0105 f ~j* 1 A it sr . v ,45 1 cirr of DENTON DENTON, TAMAd 76.601 MEMORANDUM TO: Betty Aaxan, Executive Director Municipal Services F1UYft Thomas W. Klink, Director Personnel/Employee Relations DATE. July 17, 1987 City Council Agenda Item - Ffana Overhaul genent/Slspervision Pay Plan This memo summarizes the events leading to and the reoomnandations related to the Manageoent/Supervision Pay Plan y an overhaul. Ba 1nd In 1978, the City adopted Arthur You factor job evaluations stem, Itro ; nrofasal to implement the point positions in five different ,job famaiies nwhich iclude Seev~ice%MaintenAnce Office/Support, Technical/Paraprofessional, gement/Supervision, Professional, and < The r.:oommendod stWard for fob evaluation program review is every 5 years. However, we gave not been able to afford suds a massive undertaking sine the system was established 9 years ago. Fiscal year IM/87 was no exce Lion. p Yet, recognizing the growing need to address pertinent (such as compression) Fair ner Standards Act MM) , compensation issues W elected in 1986 to present the City Council arcmce'Ind ndatiioone to ~~i' °ne Pay Plan - Management/Supervis inn. This job family was aelected as the focal grcvp because its needs, as a whole, were most pressing For example, this was the ~ negative impact from the MA ruling since their gross wagesp(which were already compressed against their subordinates' wages) frequentl be their subordinates ft brought home overtime %,sgesthe supervisorslwereonot eligible to receive, The City Council also recognized the need to address these compensation concerns and agreed to 5md, in the 1985/87 budget, a oanplete ivview of the Management/Supervision pay plan, 1 y~- say Plan Study Page Two Li 0-tober 1966, we mailed Requests for Proposal to twelve: (12) consulting organizations specializing in compensation management. As a result, in Jwuary 1987, we retained Arthur rung, Inc, to complete the Management/ Ripeivision pay plan review. I The Study Arthur Young emiioyed the following methods and documents to complete the review: i 1. Meetings with Executive Staff members 2. Position Information Questionnaires completed by the incumbents of positions verified by supervising mans :rs 3. Job interviews with incumbents and ,upervisors 4, TeleptbDne interviews 5. Follow-up conversations with sups-rvisors and incumbents f`. 6, Survey data acquired from area municipalities and local businesses/organizations with benchmark positions In June 1987, they completed their review and submitted a final report for the City's consideration. This report outlines their study approach, identifies areas for im rovement, and recommends an appruLdi to correct deficiencies. Briefly, Arthur Young identified the following areas for improvement, ' 1. Need for more than 5 levels of jobs on the fl Management/Supervision plan I 2. Nerd to make factor definitions clearer aM more r distinct 3. Need to separate market conditions from the evaluation process. This does not suggest market conditions are ° I not pertinent to pay determination, but it does suggest 1 these practices should be implemented independently 4. Need to de-emphasize the artificial job qualifications `t as a ~rim~~~ meth»d of establishing wage rates in the job etialua n process 5. Need to significantly reduce &R number of positions included in the annual salary surveys. (This can on_y be addressed with a complete classification system a study) 6. Need to establish pay philosophies for pay groups 7. Need to correct pay compression problems especially as they relate to first line supervisors Recommendations To address these concerns, Arthur Young has recommended the City do the following: Adopt the Decision UM Method (DBM) of job evaluation A' a for the Management perv s n job fecuily. D'BM would replace point factor job evaluation for this croup ,S r r ` Pay Plan Study Page Three 2. Analyze actual salaries of position incumbents instead of minimum sa aMes - future salary surveys i 3. Place ore cmphasis on -elected private industry data reZat? e to the Management Supervs n ay an to determine and improve the City's competitiveness within the local market. FUture city pay surveys should ; j include selected regional utilities and local 1 ( employers, as well as area municipalities. The.;e combined markets comprise the "composite" ma';cet 4. Consider e.t'•hlishin temporary market-based or b~ran_ ~e_s or selected positions. Shadow ranges ~-7 opay differentials for selected positions based on market analysis. See pages 6-7 of the report fvr more detail. Selected positions include: Foremen - Electric Utilities Superintendent - Metering and Substations Superintendent - Electric Distribution 5. Establish a pay philo~ to be competitive at the 5_0_t_h_v2rcenti eT-o the "composite" market based on the actual salaries paid wi in the market Along with these recommendations, Arthur Young suggested: ` 1. Guidelines for determining individual incumbents' positions in the recommended pay ranges 2. Administrative procedures for job evaluation and ongoing maintenance of the Management/Sspervis ion pay plan Cost of Implementation We have reviewed Arthur Young's report and now bring forth their recommendation for Council approval. However, as you know, financial oonstraints will force us to conservatively apply these recommendations. Therefore, we suggest the following implemen`ation strategy: 1. The effective date for program implecentation be January 1, 1987 2. Retroactive to January 1, 1987, incumbents' rates that are below the new minimum ranges (6 employees) be adjusted to the new minimum rate and their pe>formance review date beoome January 1, 1988 and annually thereafter . Pay Plan Study Page Four i 3. Incumbents who were at the to of the old range January 1, 1987 (28 employees), would be eligible for ` up to a 52 increase retroactive to January 1, 19810 and i their new review date become January 1, 1988, and annually thereafter. ('This would apply only to incumbents whose performance merits the increase and will be determined using criteria in the current performance review program,) 4. Review dates for all other incumbents remain the sane i 5. "Guidelines for Determining Positions in the Salary Range" (Exhibit J of Arthur Young's Final Report) will be implemented only as it relates to initial hiring decisions as they relate to pay. of tests to implement thetaadjust pay plan pro, we have gram. These costs are adetnalysis below: Annual Cost for Implementation ~I i MARKET 1 S8/85 ELECTED n er s n Ot ier s n Fu Ka- r s OOMOSITE $12,652 $250444 $210485 $41,492 i pip $3I,019 $52,811 TOTAL $38,096 462.977 $83.830 i % Annual Cost for Implementation with Benefits .a. i r; KARM _R 19. - Fu IM, SELECFED IT men fLn~ t er I s n r s n r Mods < Al E $14,=905$ 15 $25,401 $49,055 $3b,673 $62,438 ML 880 74 45b $99,111 We have allocated $26,300 in the general fund for first year implementation, and there are adequate funds to cover general fund implementation costs. The majority of costs are in Utility and other fund positions. Stye excess implementation costs over that budgeted will be absored through salary savings in Utility and other fund accounts, a s r Pay Plan study j Page 5 r } The successful completion of this project was only made possible with the continuous cooperation of incumbents, involved Departments (Utilities, Finance, Public Works, Data Processing, Fire, and Parks and Recreation), and the support of the Executive Committee and City Council. Their participation is certainly appreciated. Arthur Young's final report is attached. Please contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thank you. V,. as A R ~ t p F,. rr 01 n r w r {a. R ' f x ~".'~r r > ;a ~ x+^ r~ 4 Y ~~O alb r... I J h yq Ye .:..y3 10952 jI 071687:0540 S i LAN IVEJJXq P P. 1 - FY 86/87 REVISE15 AS PER UIr-R-M NION JOB FAMILY-'' M a JOB NU~IBER/TITIZ MMIMI MIDPOINT MAJUM B-3-1 ! MA10 Foreman of Streets 191219.20 24,044,80 28,849.60 FOU Foreman, Solid Waste - 19601M 2,003.73 2,404.13 ResMential 739.:0 924,80 1,109.60 MA30 Foreman, Warehouse 9.x!4 11.56 13.87 FM Minicipal Court Clerk Supv. RM Customer Service Supervisor MB10 Foreman, Wstwtr Trtmt Plant 21,216.00 26,520,00 31,824.00 Operations 11769.(0 21210.00 2,652.00 MB15 Foreman, Wstwtr Trtmt Plant 816.C0 1,020.00 10224,00 E _ Maintenance 10.20 12.75 15.30 i IB20 Foreman, Water Plant Maintenance F Foreman, Water Prod. Maintenance RM Field Services Foreman K Fib Foreman, Solid Waste - Commercial FtBZiU Foreman, Parks i'+3 Foreman) Vehicle Maintenance RM Chief Cashier RM Foreman, Meter Repair HO Foreman, Water/Sewer Field Services M865 Foreman, Electric Dist.* 23,337.60 29,182.40 35,006.40 RM Fore xt, Metering/Subst.* 1,945.99 2,431.86 2,917.20 FfM Foreman Electric Prod. Oper.* 897.60 1,122.40 1,346.40 RBB~ Foreman, Electric Maintenance* 11.22 14.03 16.83 - MC10 Office Automation Supv. 23,420.80 29,265.60 35,131.20 Animal Control Supervisor 1,951.73 2,438.80 2,927.60 ti FM Airport Manager 900.80 1,125.60 1,351.20 11.26 14.07 16.89 Z C:4-2 MD10 Engineering Tech. Supv. 259833.60 32,302,40 38,771.20 RN Foreman, Traffic 2,152.!'0 2,691.66 30230.93 FM Foreman, Elec. Prod. Main, + 993.60 1,242.40 1,491.20 FiN~T3 Foreman, Elec. Prod. r:i Ope 12.42 15.53 18,64 a 4125P/p. 1 071687:08% ~ rr F .P i x 4 T F i MAWE7MUC/SUPERVISION PAY PLAN - FY 86/87 { REVISED-T~FR C~ f~RESOLITITON ADOPTED JULY 21. 087 JOB FAMILY - M q JOB NLr "TITLE MINDCM MIDPOINT MAUCH r ME10 Supt., Water Production 280516.80 350651.20 426785.60 F Supt., Wastewater Trtmt 2,376.40 21970.93 3,565.46 RM Sipt., Water/Sewer Dist, 1,096.80 19371.20 1,645.60 FtFM Supt., Solid Waste 13.71 17.14 20.57 RM Shpt., Streets FM Supt., Vehicle Maint. FtM Supt., Building Operations , MEN Supt., Elect. Dist.* 31,366.40 39,228.80 47,070.40 $ Supt., Metering/Sibst.* 2,613.86 39269.06 3,922.53 1,206.40 10508.60 1,610.40 15.08 18.86 22.63 MFIO Supt., Parks Maintenance 31,470.1A 39,353.60 47,216.00 Fib Building Official 2,622.53 3,279.46 3,934.66 FM Purchasing Agent 1,210.40 1,513.60 1,816.00 Customer Service Manager 15.13 18.92 22.70 FfiSa Eire Marshall •A 1 d t ?;j M A Supt., Electric Prod. 34,736.00 43,430.40 52,104.00 Supt., Leisure Services 2,894.66 3,619.20 4,342.00 IF 11336.00 10670.40 2,004.00 . 16.70 20.88 25.05 de `y f 1 A i' 1 ,f}' `s *Survey data indicates the need for a temporary market pay differential for these jobs (+102). This pay differential will be subject to annual review. t" +Inoumbents serving as acting division supervisor with 52 premium pay. . 4125P/Q.2 071687;,0855 r 1 s DRAINAGE Is Drainage Plan A. Levels of protection B. street flooding requirements C. Pipe versus channels t Its New Sub-divisions t A. Use of the drainage plcn to help in the initial design. , , ` Be Actual design t C. Requirements for off site improvements P ' III. Existing Developments or Existing coned Property t A. 9esign requirements for existing drainage ' Be ,Requirement, to eliminate flooding of adjacent land ij We Development of CIP Projects <'`f As Use of drainage plan to help design major systems Be Complaints and areas of flooding that we are aware of Cs Tying major existing systems together Ve Legal Implications t ' As lEMA requirements Be Disputes between adjacent land owners and/or the City C. New legislation (impact fees) 3545M " 'iJ'~!~Flkd.J~tfi.':1(t nrh-.n ri[~.e/di ~A.ti h.,.y.•. r a ,.,i p. "Y~#•:NS~t~ I{, t , An Official Resolution of the Hoard of Trustees of the Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. WHEREAS, the Main Street program capitalizes on the unique character of the downtown area and promotes economic development within the j context of historic preservations and WHEREAS, the City of Denton has merle numerous applications to be accepted into the Texas Main Street program without succas•, but the surrounding communities of Mcliinney, t•wisville, Grapevine and Greenville have been accepteds and g WHEREAS, "self-initiated" Main Street programs do authorise access and 3tt services to the Texas !fain Street Centers as well as other appropriate assisting state agenciess and WHEREAS a total of $43,000 has been proposed for hiring and training a project director for a local "self-initiat•d• Main Street program through the Planning Department of the City of Denton beginning with the Annual Budget for October Is NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. does endorse the Main Street program concept and encourage the City Council to consider approval of the funds necessary to hire and train a project director through the City Planning Department. PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of June, 1987, A.D. gg"t' oc 0 ~ Boa 51/ No Lynn G • J e _ & ti Barbara sf. 11411f Secretary i, i 1 f } An official Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Denton Chamber of Commerce. i i WHEREAS, the Main Street program capitalizes on the unique character of the downtown area and Promotes economic development within the context of historic Preservation; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton has made numerous applications to be accepted into the Texas Main Street program without success, but the 1 surrounding communities of McKinney, Lewisville, Grapevine and t Greenville have been accepted; and WHEREAS, "self-initiated" Main Street programs do authorize access and services to the Texas Main Street Center, as well as other appro- priate assisting state agencies; and WHERE", a total of $43,000 has been Proposed for hiring and training a project director for a local 'self-initiated" Main Street program through the Planning Department of the City of Denton beginning with the Annual Budget for October It NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, Oat the Board of Directors of the Denton Chamber of Commerce does endorse the Main Street program concept and encourage the City Countil to consider approval cf the funds necessary to hire and train a project director through the City Planning Department. ? PASSED AND APPROVED this lSth day of June, 1987, A. 0. r' -ro m+ Y wni~e Mcxenzte, Chaff o e oar j 4el' a en er, as n j 1 Corpo me 5e<retary . Ln.11 1 '[.R 1♦ 1 1 .iJ 4 ft h An Official Resolution of the Executive Committee of the Denton County Historical Commission. 1 WHEREAS. the Main Street program capitalizes on the unique character of the downtown area and promotes economic development within the context of historic preservation; and a i WHEREAS. the City of Denton has made numerous applications to be accepted into the Texas Main Street program without access, but the surrounding communities of McKinney, Lewisville, Grapevine and Greenville have been accepted; and WHEREAS, "691f-initiated" Main street program do authorize access and f services to the Texas Main Street Center, as well as other appropriate assisting state agencies; and WHEREAS, a total of $43,000 has been proposed for hiring and training a project director for a local "self.-initiated' Main Street program through the Planning Department of the City of Denton beginning I with the Annual Budget for October It I NUN. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEDi that the Denton County Historical Commission does endorse the Main Street program concept and encourage the City Council to consider approval of the funds necessary to hire and train a project director through the City Planning Department. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of July, 1997, A.D. rmen~ su t Gowc'y, Chal j • a Burgos, r• a i , i I I Historic L n'dmark Commission May Il, 1987 Thofe regular nee ti ng of the Historic Landsatk Commission of the City Denton, Texa Rsoom vas of held on MuniciMaypa1l 1, Build i987, at 4:30 p.m., In the Civil Defense ng. Present: Mike Cochran, Catherine Conrody, Gayylar. iickey, Richard Hayes, Bullitt Lowry, Tom Nilier, Samuel Marino, and Janet Shelton Absents Robert Albrecht and Sandra Matthews , Present from Staff: Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator; Denise Spivey, Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney, and 0llvia Carson, Secretary Chairmen Mike Cochran called the meeting to m,der. Janet Shelton was sworn in by Jennifer Walters, Ci+p Secretary. Mr. Cochran welcomed Ms. Shelton to the Commission. I. Ml nutes ,i pp Mregultt onssdiyebetelEminatinp somegtentntsshould read... a ut was moved cby Mr. Marino, seconded byy Mr. Lowry and regular meeting of Apri] j13o Iyalovest corrected. of the It. Discussion of North Texas State University Master Plan and Surrounding Area Ms. Carson stated thst staff is still working on the parking situation in the Fry Street, Hickory Street, and Avenue A area. A represer.t,~tive from North Texas State University was not able to attend the neeting, but the University's nester plan has been provided for review byy the Commission. The State has given the University permisslon to purchase and demolish properties in a large area around the University. All VVroperties between Welch and Bernard Streets are included in tAIs area. There are a number of houses In this area that may be historically important, None of then have historic deal nations. Any comment the Commission wishes to oaks on the Iniversity's matter plan will be forwarded to the ' L• University. Y; ? Mr, Lowry stated that the University does not have condem• nation ppowers, but the State can condemn property for the ' University. iks. Evans stated that the Block Grant office has rehabilitated a house on Sycamore Street, Ms, Carson stated that the University also wants the City to designate Barnard Street as a secondary major arterial Instead TtfieWCtty'itthorouttnhfare planfwas recently approvedhbycthegLand Use Planning Committee and will be presented to tAa City Council upon completion of the revised Denton Development Guide. Mr. Fickey asked when the Universityy will begin action to Purchase the properties and demnlisA them, Ms. Carson said immediate action Is anticipated. crib^, Mr. Fickey asked If the University has to pay lair market 1 w- aA.v !'e4a d'n .l?.5 .n -ir•~fV .a+ro: ;l.(p~,i. \ I ICI »;1 HLC Minutes May 11, 1991 Page 2 Ms. Carson said yes. Mr. Flckey asked if any of 0%e streets will be altered to accommodate additional parking. a Ms. Carson stated that the University proposes to make Nelch an Internal street and to close Avenue C. The University will have to go through the street abandonment process with the City which includes action by the Plannin and Zoning Commission and City Council, and provision of a1equate compensation to the City if approved. Mr. Fickey asked what powers the Commission has to protect houses that are threatened by the University. Ms. Carson stated that there is the potential that Individual property owners ■ay not wish to sell. Others ■ay not be aware that their home is eligible for historic designation. If a property within this area is designated historic it may be moved to another location or perhaps the University might build around It. North Texas State University has not ex- pressed any Interest In relocating structures at this time. Mr. Lowry stated that he would like to have a representative from North Texas present at the meeting. Ms. Carson stated that an invitation had been extended maid de- clines. She said that a representative will also be invited to the neat meeting. Mr. Lowry stated thst the County Historical Commission had tried unsuccessfully to get the University to relocate struc- tures on Hulberry and Sycamore. North Texas argued that they did not want the liability of problems that might arise after y the move. • Mr. Morris stated that he does not know why a house couldn't be moved and sold as is without llabiIIty. Mr. Cochrtn stated that he has bought houses from the University. The houses are auctioned and the buyer is responsible for moving them. Mr. Reyes arrived and was sworn in. Mr. Cochran welcomed his to the Commission. Mr. Lowry stated that he would like a copy of the North Texas State University Master Plan. Ms. Carson sated that she would have copies made for the Commission or request more from the University. Mr. Cochran stated that there has nit been any Incentive for proyaity owners In the area to renovate their housing because ' of tAeIt awareness of the University's Master Plan. Mr, Lowry stated that he worked on a University Master 1,1,n 20 years aro. He said that there Is no guarantee that pla.tis rn paper will become reality. i Mr. Marino stated that North Texas Stitt University is aware R ! of how badly parking space is needed. 1.;. Shelton siked If there are renovation funds available for historically designated homes. Ms. hvins stated that the Block Grant Office has a program that provides rehabilitation funding for owner occupied housing in which the owner falls in lower or middle income ; brackets, There is also a program to rehabilitate rental M HLC Minutes dlay ll. 19x7 Page 3 Properties. Ms. Evans stated that the ppregrams are designed { netioglhborhood properties block rant of 1EEic: nelgho` barhood is going to be demolished. Mr. Cochran stated that the propperty owners must request his. Y torlc deli nation themselves, He said that there is a nice f %ictorlan house on the southwest corner of erard and Hlsh- land, and one on b the west side of Bernard in the 300 block. III. Discussion of Construction/Development Standards In the Oak-Hickory Historic Dist rlot Mr. Cochran stated that there is an illegal fraternity sign In 1 the historic district on Hickory Street. Ms, Carson stated that bc;auso specific standards for the his- toric district have not been adopted by the City Coancll, the current sign ordinante prevails. The sign will be referred to code enforcement to check for compliance with tha ordinance, Mr. Lowry stated that specific standards for the historic € are` include delnetheaDistricty?rthe eservationlPl;n.He said they Mr. Norris sir- , L"st the specific regulations recommended byy the Commission must be adopted by the City Council to be effectlre. The regulations would be established for the district by adoption of to ordlnance by Council. I Mr. Miller sold that he thought signs must be attached to ' buildings In restdential areas. { Na. Carson a ted that detached, permanent signs of a specific site are p,r3 isslble. IV. Receive a Report and Consider Makint a Recommendation y,! Cancer,,. ,ng the Self initiated N A I A Street Program Theresa Waller, President of the Central Business District AAssociation, stated that the Association is made of merchants, owners. Central efund a "Hain Strtet" DDro}ect which is a plan for downtown revitalism. pro ectsfor six years` pEachryear,ofireTTexashcities are Chosen to participate, Denton cannot apply for the State initiatedh"MainuStreet"limproveneents however, Funde ing pi smrogursam frm pp telf materials, information, and trainingDusednInithehState program, In order to have the Main Street program put In the City Coun• oil budget, the Association is requesting the support of the Historic Landmark Commission No. Waller further stated re , She have r nts. vostmethat eceived vsllargeemonetaryd return lo on street In Mr. Miller questioned the meaning of a self-Initiated program, No. Waller responded that Denton would have access to all Main Street program information. The Denton manager of the Main S are treet pro y rim will have to ppay for two weeks of tralnin th Denton willnotereceivehthelseIts rvices chosen of a state sArchitecAlsoo t. The Denton manager will be allowed to attend seminars sponsored by recalvt he Hain Street program, be visited by the State staf t tters. The manager f, and m s State office and the program must berefundedehorth to the ouncil each year Ms, taller stated that In C aomecueir there are compromises between historlcal values and economic J 'j .t_ HLC Minutes May 11, 1987 Page 4 incentives, but the people are tuned in to recepturinaa hark. cage and promotin it. She said that now is a good t[me for Denton to bee owe ~nvolved because of the Courthouse renovation, the movemer.t of utilities ti underground service, and the en- thusiasm of local merchants. Ms. Shelton asked what the project manager's salary would be. Ms. Waller replied that she is unsure and it ma depend on the amount of funding provided by the City. Lewlsvfil! has a bud- et of $30,000 per year which includes the manager's salary, Lut their office space is donated. Mr. Miller asked who will make design decisions. Ms. killer said that she Is unsure, The Historic Landmark Commission will bo consulted. The Main Street program tries to get low interest funds from local banks to do renovations f and applicants will be encouraged to get historic Landmark i Designations. i Mr. Miller said that it seems essential for a project if this nature to have a professional consultant. Ms. killer stated that when the downtown area was new, the buildings did not all look alike. Creating a unifled lock is not a goal. It is variety and honesty in design that appeals to people. Mr. Lowry stated that the oldest btlldinY on the square was T built In 1874. the newest one in the 1970s. Ms. Waller said that under the main Street program, if a new building is added it must be historically based in design. Mr. Lowry stated that Denton's first Main Street application was nit approved because the need was not as great as that x, of other cities who had applied. The second year there was no local merchant support. Ms. Waller stated that she is seeking a motion or resolution from the Commission to the City Council suppporting Maln Street and indicating a willingness to work with lt. She said that any offers of help such as economic aid or office space would be appreciated. t r Mr. Cochran stated that the project Is exciting especially ' since the Courthouse will be finished soon. Mr. Lowry sdAld that the Courthouse renovation is projected to be completed on September 19. Mr. Hayes asked If money budgeted by the City Council would to to actual renovation at for administration. 4 r Ms. Waller stated that the money will be used for admtnlstra- tion such as the project manager's salary, paper, xeroxtnee, t office space, festivals, fliers, and advertising. She soSd that the City could opt to give grants for renovation but that 1 it is especially important to hire a person who can create in- to as t and enthusiasm in area more s nts, No. Evans stated that in the pait, the merchants have agreed 4 to fund the manager of the Main Street program, Ms. Wailer stated that at present, the Centril Business Dig- trier Association Cannot fund the position. Dues art, kept low to encourage membership. Mr Hayes asked how much money ti,ould be needed for the Denton Main Street project, HLC Minutes May 11, 1987 Page S Ms, Waller sold that it will take $50,000 - good job. :70,000 to do a projectrmana;ershso thatsefefesedon~teesalary rateesof tot her. Ms. Evans stated that a draft budget has been prepared for the Main Street progrom. The budget totaled $13,000 and included office supplies, postage, and advertising. Office space and secretarial aid were not Included. Another issue Is whether j the project manager as a City employee would be entitled to benefits. Contract labor is probably o better alternative. f ? Mr. Lcvey moved that the Commission support in pprinciple the i application of Denton for the Self-Initiated Maln Street tharogr If fundedhthroughrthefCity City Coui,til, be etakea from the eneral fund. Seconded by Ms. Conrady and unanimously carded (8-0). Mr. Hayes said that he liked the motion to su program. He said that once the Commission receivedtmore information they could make a more specific recommendation of funding from ndi thegCityhrndchowatheuepfund~,shouidc be lused. t V. hew Business r j ' Mr. Lowry stated that House Bill 1697 proposes that money be j taken from historic and art funds and given to private, o tourist --evelopment groups. The bill has appropriations committee and sub,committeeandeistwaitingeon a p T vote before proceeding to the State Senate. Opposition is being built n the Senate. he said that he x111 send a copy of they bill to all Commission urembers with encouragement that the write the legislature. Mr. Cochran stated that cultural affairs encourata tourism. f , ' He asked how the money would be spent if the bill ')asses. hr owry said that It would be liven to private ourlst groups. He said that currently enton receives +l5000OO to rs support the Arts Coancll, the Denton Ballet, Co Aunity C x Theater, Orchestra, Band, etc. t . t unanimouslydcarviada(8.0) aty6iSO powryr seconded by Mr. Mayes and Y R Mp 1 ~~r 1 S 1 4~ A 1.. 1 s h t, . i1 i I City of Denton City Council Minutes / June 16, 1987 The Council Convened into the work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense room, PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem McAdams; council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and Hopkina. ABSENT: Mayor Stephens 1. The Council convened into Executive Session to discuss S legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments, More specifically to hold a discussion on a proposal to be submitted to the Denton Humane Society for the construction and operation of ar, Animal Adoption Center/land-lease negotiations. No ofl;icial action was taken. 2. The Council held a discussion of possible annexation of Rector subdivision described as a 15.234 acre tract located i in the a, Burleson Survey No. 65 and the J. Ayers Survey No. 2 1 and situated west of I-35 at anj north of the intersection of j Rector Road, s Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this was a plat submitted in the ETJ which had a potential batch plant on it near 135. The batch plant was considered temporary but the project would take approximately 4 years. It also could not be determined if the plant would be removed after the project was completed. Input from the neighbors was that they wanted the a city to annex them, water and sewer services were not scheduled for that area until the year 20DO unless a major development occurred in the area. Staff had no fir.n recommendation except for the possibility of further atudy and ' a cost detail. Mayor Pro Tem McAdams asked If the project was for four years n and the property was annexed, could the plant continue. ' Carsons replied that if the . plant were to shut down for a 1 period of 6 months, it then could not start up again. The plant could also not be expanded it it were annexed into the City. Council Member Boyd asked if there was a plant there now. Carsons replied that currently there was a State Highway Department trailer on the property and a slab for a workshop building but no plant, There was a possibility that the batch plant would be built on a different site and that only the workshop would be at that s' location. Consensus of the Council was to continue with the annexation '+j+ ) process. 3. The Council hold a discussion of proposed Annexation of Mingo Industrial Trict Subdivision described so a 6.6 acre r. tract located in the Morteau forest Survey No. 411 At the northeast cornet of Mingo Road and North Cooper Creek Road. Cecile Carsons, Urban Planner, stated that this was a voluntary plannedi developm nt, wi th annexation and s residential Ceuses. for recommended further study fo: annexation, , Consensus of the Council was continue with the annexation process, 4. The Council held a discussion of zoningq requsste for 530,2 acres (Lakeview) and 415,4 acres (Southvlewl, i i Y , r 1{{ r W i i I ~I City of Denton City Councll Minutes June 16, 1987 Page 2 Cecile Caroms, Uroan Planner, stated that the Lakeview property was~anner:d approximately one year ago but had not been zoned. The (Aisting planned development was for 690 acres with 9,571 units. The proposed planned development would have 4 810 acres with 4,177 units. The Southview annexation consisted of two proposals +ith some Corps of Engineers land between the parcels. This discussion was for information only and no action was taken. i E S. The Councll received a report on the scheduling of the 1 new fire station construction. John Cook, Fire Chief, reported that PTI Firemaster had identified two locations that were in need of a new fire 1 station, one in the North Lakes area and the other near Llll£an ; Miller Parkway. Both stations could not be built at the game time due to funding restraints for manpower. Cook proposed to begin construction of the station in the North Lakes area first for economic reasons - the City already owned the lend. After that station was completed, construction would immediately begin on the Lillian Miller station. Consensus of the Council was to proceed as proposed. The Council then reconvened in the Executive Session to complete discussions of the earlier Session. No official action was taken. ,'.,.r The Council convened into the regular session at 1:00 p.m. in y * the Council Chambers. PRESENTS Mayor Pro Tem Mckdamsr Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and Hopkins. 1 ABSENT: Mayor Stephens 1. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of June 2, 1987 and the special call meeting of I June 9, 1987. ` Gorton motion) Alexander second to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously, 1- 2. The Council received and tabulated bide for purchase of ;1,1 million City of Denton Certificates of Obligation, Series 1987-A, Frank Medanich, first Southwest Corporation, presented 12 bid proposals to the Council. The companies and the proposed average interest rate werel (1) Smith Barney, 6.70841 (2) x first Republic Bank Dallas, 6,61011 111 MBank Capital Matkrits, } Lufkinbi Jenrette, 6591441eB1t6)CKidderr P abodeyy `SCo,p 6,65451 171 Prudential-Baths Securities, 6,49151 (8) Dnderwood Newhaus a Co,, 7,0491 (9) Lovett Mitchell Webb 6 Garrison, 6,84151 (10) Dean Whitten Reynolds, Inc.) 6.78201 (11) Masterson a Co,, ti 7,0091 (12) Rauseher Pierce Refoner, Ind., 6,80722, Mayor Stephens joined the meeting. ,i r , i City of Denton City Council Minutes June 16, 1987 Page 3 3. Puba c Hearings and JohnA~ SerdaThe r, Council considered Psychiatric oIn talttuterice America, requesting approval of an amended detailed plan for a i 1.819 acre planned development (pD-1). The property was located at 2026 West University Drive and shown in the Robert g Beaumont Survey, Abstract No. 31, A psychiatric hospital was currently under construction at this location. If approvtd the amendment would permit the construction of an addition containing eight (8) physicians' offices, a receptionist apace, i o waiting area, and two group rooms. Z-1851 The Mayor opened the public hearing, t Jack Price, Howard K. Smith, spoke in favor of the petition, i He stated that the plans had been prepared in accordance with 11 City guidelines, had met the requests of the staff and had received recommendation of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. He req,eated approval of the petition. No one spoke In opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing, Cecile Carsons, Urban Planner, stated that the construction was an addition to the current site, it did not violate intensity and did not Impact the development over what the usage currently was. It met all of the requirements of tha Planned Development ordinance and Planning and Zoning had unanimously recommended the petition for approval. The following ordinance was con,;dereds NO. 87-106 AN ORDINANCE AMENDINO ORDINANCE NO. b6-165 TO PROVIDE FOR AS AMENDED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED PLAN FOR 4.8 ACHES OF LAND LOCATED AT 2026 WEST UNIVERSITY ` DRIVE PROVIDINO FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF 11000,00 FOR VIOLATIONS rHEREOf1 AND PAOVIDING FOR AN EfILCTIVE DATE, Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance, On roil vote, McAdam e"Aye "ayeAlexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton -i "aye," Ayer Boyd "Aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously, k B. The Council held a public hearing concerning the =y; proposed annexation of 212,12 acres being a part of the 1. Coy j - Survey, Abstract No, 2121 J, Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 21 9, S Burleson 84rvey, Abstract No. 651 N, Coker Survey, Abstract No. 2191 and the R. Johnson Survey, Abstract No. 666. IA-16) i ' ` The Mayor opened the public hearing, Cecile Carsons, Urban Planner, stated that this was a request b y the City of Denton, It was a 500' strip along f15t, This was the to nexationpwould hearin and If t tad on Augusts 16, was 1con 991, it extended the city of Denton city limits to its extreme northern point with the City of 8angt , approximately to Clear Creek, i Lisa Kits spoke In favor of the annexation, She was an owner I of property in the area and was in favor of the annexation, I i.' • 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - City of Denton City council minutes June 16, 1987 Page 4 Sam Rector ske in opposition to the annexation. He stated that he felt the area landowners would be best served by the City of Sanger and not the City of Denton. 1 Mrs. Arlo Newton spoke in opposition stating that she wanted to wostuld In be the too country far fo ' or In the City of Sanger. She felt that it ay for services from the City of Denton. The Mayor closed the j public hearing. Consensus of the Council was to continue the annexation process. 1 Item S.C. was moved ahead in t} agenda order. # S• Ordinances C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance author zing the Issuance, sale and delivery of City of Denton Certificates of Obligation, Series 1907-A, and approving and authorizing instruments and procedures relating thereto. Prank Medanich, First Southwest, stated that all the bids had been tabulated as submitted and the bid from Prudential Baeche Securities was the best proposal submitted. He recommended accepting that bid, < Boyd motion, Alexander second to accept the bid of Prudential Baeche Securities. Motion carried unanimously. ! The following -rdlnance was considered: No. 87-103 r-. AN ORDINANCE A7IHORIZING THE ISSJANC6, SALE AND i•,," UELiveKi oe Ci'ri of DENTON CERrIJtCkrES OF OBLIGArION, ,,•r; SSRIES 1967-A, AND APPROVING AND AJT?OR121.1G I"ISIRUMENTS AND PHOCEDVAES AELArING rHER6rO. Alexandec motion, McAdams motion to adopt the ordinance. On f roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," 1 Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and N-yor Stephens "eye." Motion carried unanimously. 4 The Council returned to the regular agenda order. k 3. Puolic Hearings C. The Council halt a public hearing concerning the request of Grace Temple Baptist Church for a quitclaim and IQ-67} abandonment of Gregg Street between Ponder and Fulton streets. The Mayor opened the public hearing, David Ellison, Assistant to the City Mamager, gave a brief a overview regarding Gregg Street. Gregg Street was a standard City of Denton residential street with SD' of dedicated k right-of-way and approximately 20-22' of improved surface, back of curb to back of curb. The portion dealing with the _ quitclaim was approximately 3651 in Ion 't' from Ponder to + Fulton, adjoining property on both sides bOlt)IIng to Grace Temple Baptist Church. The distance from F1, Oak to Congr east the next through street if that portion of Gregg Street was quitclaimed and abandoned, was approximately 12001, The distance from Gregg Streit to Congress was approximately 1000.1100. As a point of comparison, the City of Dintdn'e Subdivision and Land Development Regulations stated that the maximum length of a sew block would be 1000' and the typical i I, City of Denton City council minutes June 16, 1987 Page 5 length of a block was approximately 400-5001. In June 1980, Grace Temple'3aptiat Church first approached the City of Denton about building a new sanctuary. The sanctuary required la8 parking spaces based on a seating requirement of 1 space per every 3 persons to be accommodated. The Church went to the Board of Adjustment and requested a variance of that parking requirement. The Board of Adjustment determined in June of 1980 that it would grant a variance of those required parking spaces with the conoltion that by a 3 year period 2/3 of the required parking would be provided and within a 6 year period, all of the required parking would be provided. In the interim between that point and today, some additional parking was provided by the Church. Additional land was required and the Church became quite agressive in plane to move forward to comply with the parking requirement as well as to comply with } some of their master plan needs for increased educational i space. Currently the Church had about 160 spaces of the y 3 required 189 spaces. The Church wanted to provide the City S t with the parking but they felt they needed control of Gregg Street to meet with their building plans. The Church came to the Development Review Committee in May 22, 1983 and requested d that the city recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission } and the City Council that the street be abandoned. Staff response at that time was not favorable because at that time the Church did not have firm plans. In October 1983, the Church again requested the Development Review C,.nmittee to recommend abandonment with the same recommendation from the Development Review Committee. In February, 1987, the Church came back again to the Development Review Committee, this time ' with additional parking and had acquired substantial property i and had a firm idea what they wanted to do with the street if they were allowed to acquire it and had it abandoned. Two additional meetings occurred and as of March, 1987, the general consensus of the staff was that the Church had a point in contenoing that the street was used to a significant degree by people on church related business. Planning and Zoning Interjected the overall community Interest. The Development Review Committee recommended denial to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Toe Planning and Zoning Commission referred the matter to the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commiaslon which recommended approval and subsequentially the Planning and ZonInq Commission recommended denial to the City Council. Staff presented an alternative to construct a new street at the northern boundary of the Church's property. The Church did not agree to the alternate ve due to financial obligations. The City would be compensated for the abandonment of Gregg Street at an assessed value of :32,000. There would be a strelght trade in the coat of tight-of-way and only the construction s Cost$ would be included In the alternative. Estimated construction costs of the new street were $28,000 for a standard 31' street and $21,000 for a 21' street which the City Engineer felt would be adequate. An estimate was done for the cost for maintenance on Gregg Street for the next 3-5 years. } That amount came to $1,500 - $2,000 and that amount was a possible reduction in the cost of a new street. Council Member Boyyd asked if the appraisal took Into consideration the vaiui of the improvements of the :treat. 4 Ellison replied that the appraisal did not take into account the value of the improvements. .r d Roger Holler, Associate Pastor of Grace Temple Baptist Church, stated that the church wanted to come into compliance with he parking requirements. The Church had three goals with the request for Gregg Street (1) safety of the children attending y, I 14 y 'e City of Denton City Council Minutes June 16, 1987 Page 6 the day care,at tLe Church, (2) full Compliance with the City parking code, and (3) enhance the beauty and value of the surrounding area. City traffic counts indicated that approximately 501 of the traffic on Gregg Street was church related traffic, 28-301 was related to University parking and Historical Museum parking, and 201 was unrelated movement. He felt that the majority of the opposition wss a matter of personal cunvenience reflected in the 201 unrelated traffic. It did not justify moving Gregg Street to benefit to few people, dollar continued that in his opinion tht Fire Department would benefit with the closing of Gregg street in that at the present time, few large trucks could manage the street and if the street were closed, the Church would provi,le a fire lane for the Fire Department. If a new street were put in, the Church would lose approximately 70 parking spaces, Council Member Gorton asked if the Church did not own Some i properties in the surrounding area and if so, would that not be space for potential parking. Holler replied that yes except that there were mortgages on those notes and nothing could be done to the property until the mortgages were paid off. Council Member Hopkins asked Holler if he was aware that if the I Council voted to give Gregg Street and if not build a new { street, the City would have to be paid for the street, k Kollar replied yes. k> David Morton, Chairman of the Building and Ground Subcommittee x of the Long Range Planning Committee of Grace remple Baptist Church, asked the Council to allow those in the audience in support of the request to stand and be acknowledges. He stated that the abandonment of Gregg street was primarily to allow the Church to use the property it alreaiy had in a most effective way. Jack Gill, Long Range Planning Committee, stated that the Church was agreasively purchasing property in the area but if the property was not for sale, the property could not be bought. The Church needed parking now ami needed paved 4 parking. Educational space was needed but the Church was not ready to build at that time. Safety was needed for the children at the day care when being dropped off and picked up, Pat Bennett, 307 Ponder, spoke in opposition. She stated that Gregg Street was the closest way to get to Welch and Hickory. Gregg Street was well used, The neighborhood was a college neighborhood, not a residential neighborhood which meant more traffic in the area. Gregg Street was the only legal way to 4 { get to Hickory and Welch. It was a well used street and a needed street. She would be agreeable to en alternative street, Mike Cochran spoke in opposition due to the fact that he uses f the street a lot. He suggested that if the safety of the children at the day care was a problem, the Church might want to find an alternative parking lot for drop-off and pickup, it was reasonable for the Church to want to expand but not at a disservice to others, Diana Ricks spoke in opposition. She would not be fn opposition co closing Gregg Street if an alternative street wero available. J r 'y y City of Denton city council Minutes June lb, 1987 Page 7 Gregg Edward-i spoke in favor of the reyue3t. he further explained the, need for additional parking and why the Church was opposed to the construction of a new street. } The Mayor closed the public hearing. r ? 'The council held a lengthy discussion reya[uiny required parking spaces, fire lanes ana proposed alternatives tot the i Church. Alexander motion, (,of ton second to instruct the staff to prepare the proper legal documents for the abandonment and quitclaim of Gregg Street between Ponder and Fulton Streets contingent on the dedication and construction of a new Ureyg Street of 94'wldth at a point to be determined by Council, staff and Church of$icials. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Consent Agenda Mayo[ Stephens stated that Item 4,A.4. had been removed trom the agenda by staff. * McAdams motion, Alexander second to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item 4.A.4. Motiun carried unanimously. Consent Agenda r 1 4' 1 h, Bids and Purchase Ucdersr P , 1. bid 19751 - Office operatiny Supplies 2. bid 19754 - Pa amounted 5altcnyear sr 3, bid W ; b - urrruserw, Hater T kamuved by 4, sits 491S9 - Lillian xiller ra[xway eavLny e StatY orainaga p J. Plats and Replats Cunsider approval of reliminar anu tinil replat of Lot 10 of the ponder Addition. item 8 was oovsu ahead in the agenda order. 8, Receive the Planning and toning Commission's x f~ racommenUatlon for a Five Year Capital Improvements Plan. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the City Charter fb`t 4 required a capital improvements program be filed with the ) Council by the Planning Commission. This would be an official filing of the oecuweents and A study session would be scheduled i in early July for a detailed discussion of both Capital f Imptovement plans with formal Council action following that, Bill Claiborne, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission, f1rn~, stated that the non-utility portion of the CIP Wds a CF a combination of two worlds - the principles and practices tnst r " + the Land Leo Planning Committee was proposiny as Well as trying to play Catch up on projects in the City that needso to be done. The projects proposed were consistent witn the practices and policies currently in practice and ercourays industrial j" I growth to continue to make Denton a sell-sustaining committee along with balanced growth. Claiborne presented the followiny proposalst streets sno traffic, y2T500uUr turn !anal for ky y arterials , ~9u ODUJ King Fisher drainage, 75,00ui Aasch Branch Road-Phase It ~57b 00Ui Masch branch load-chase 11) 0 0u0,UU01 airport lighting, i250,000$ runway-taxi extensions, .7 Gif+ . i , x., f* N yr ~ ; I .1r , i 1 , r } City of Uenton City council minutes June 16, 19b7 Page b i 1312,5901 utility runway taxiway, $2UU,0001 pedestrian signal., 3U0 UUO1 Cooper Creek channel improvements, $I,000,U1UUI 5U meter indoor-outdoor pool, $1,00O,UUUI aerial device for Sire Department, 50 U,OU0; outdoor emergency airen system, $452,75U1 buokmobile, 15U, 00U. 7. The Council received the Utility Uepartment's Five Ii Year Capital Improvements Plan for fiscal years 1961t-199~. I Roland Laney, chairmdn of the Public Utilities Hoard, presented tII the following proposals: (in millions of dollars) lant improvements, $3.11 transformers, $1.51 distribution, 8.11 equipment, $2.21 load management/ customer incentives, 3.01 service center expansion, $.4I acquiring existing electric linear $l.li underground line conversions, $1.51 upgrade water plent, $2.91 new water plant, $16.U; Loop gbh pump station, UI storage tanks, $2.01 new water lines, $6.3; oversize water/sewer lines, $1.91 new sewer lines, $1.11 wastewater treatment renovation, $2.71 addition to wastewater treatment plant, $3.41 Lewisville/Hay Roberts hydro, $6.7. 5 The Council returned to the regular agenda order. 5. Ordinances V 1. =s A. The Council considered aooption of an oroinance Acceptlny competitive bids and providing tar the award or A contracts for the purchase of materials, equlpmcnt, supplies of services, ey The following ordinance was considered) r+U. b7-IQ7 A:1 V,7UI;+A14Ur. ACCa Y'1'1 ilU WrhY'd 1'I i'!YE tlIUS Ada AdAnUldu A ' f CUIvTKRCi FUN '1 nL PU KC'n ASE Ut ....".'i ,A LS EyUlPh 61+1 SuViLlt5 UR SEAVLCL;S; ieuVIutuU tVK TMc eakt.NUli'UKt: OF , c4 FU1;U5 THEAidORLI AdD PAUVIUlu(i FOR AN 6FFEC TIVL UA1't.. k ` McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the Ordinance. • On COIL 'aye,' Alexander layer' hopkins aye, l±urton 4dter~ MCAd lay*,, aye, Ayer r EOyd dyer and mayor Staphene 'aye.' , ' Motion carried unanimously. a. Item 9 was removed by staff. Ili ti' 55 ; C. Item C was moved ahead in the order, t }4, D. The council considered adoption of an ordinance Bmending the Taxation Chapter of tt+e Code of Ordinances by the addition of section 22-6 therwto relating to taxation of y a ~1 telecommunications services, Tne following ordinance was conaideredl y 4 ' u~ , ,rY r,.~ N0. b7-lUY 'jr AN ORDINANCE AM0DINU '1'HL 'TAXATION' CHAPT&K UP 'i'Md CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DLNTUN, TEXAS by Thd ,ytifn r~' ADDITION OF SECTION 21-6 THEXI:TO i(BLATINU 'CO TAXATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; BAKINO TH19 ONOINANCL CUMULATIVE"; PKOVIDINU A SLVERABILITY C'LAUBEI PXOVIUIN i r t~ p, FOR PUBLICATION AND NAMING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. f ! Alexander motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On +f'" roll voter McAdams 'aye," ' Alexander 'sye,• Hopkins 'sye,• Gotton •eyer' Aywr 'Byer boys "aye,' and mayor Stephens •eye,' Motion carried unanimously, ' tIt ~ jA I 1 AAA .,C If ~ ; , . r r 5", City of Denton city council minutes June lu, 1957 Page 9 E. ;The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the city of Denton and Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc. for the purchase of electrical equipment and facilities. The following ordinance was considered: N0. 57-110 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DENTON COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DArE. Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, stated that the I Denton County Cooperative had an electrical distribution line along Bonnie Brae from Highway 77 to University Drive. It was a stated policy of the Council and the Public Utilities Board to buy out any Cooperative or any other utility in the area whenever possible. McAdams motion, Gorton second to adopt the ordinance, On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "eye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. ! F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance adding Sections 14-76 and 14-77 to Article VI of Ch+bter 14 "Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions" of the Code of " s Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas) providing for local Jr i' fees as authorized by the Texas Alcohol and beverage Code ~r ff section 11.38, as amended) providing for a penalty clausal r, providing a severability clauses and providing for an effective } date. The following ordinance was considered: NO. a7-111 AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTIONS 14-h; and 14-77 TO ARTICLE VI OF CHAPTER 14 "OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS} PROVIDING FOR LOCAL FEES AS AUTHORIZED ' BY THE TEXAS ALCOHOL a BEVERAGE CODE SECTION 11.38, AS AMENDED PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE) PROVIDING A r SEVERABILITY CLAUSE) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, McAdams motion., Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "ayes" Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "ayes" Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and mayor Stephens "Aye." Motion carried unanimously, J` G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter One of tLe Code of Ordinances by the addition of Article ti thereto prescribing qualifications for members of xy' , Boards and Commissions of the City of Denton. t;r The following ordinance was considefedt ~*»J d, +rt 1E NO. 87-117 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER ONE OF THE CODE OF ry="` „ta'r ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASI PRESCRIBING QUALIFICATIONS FOR MEMBERS Of BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS OF THE CITY) PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSEI AND it sr, 1 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. W 11 { 1 1 ~ O• i 4 ~ { , 1 4 . ~I City of Denton City Council Minutes June It, 1967 Page lU Debra Drayovi ch, City Attorney, pointed out to the Council that the Airport Board dia not requite all of its members to be citizens of the City of Denton - three members from the County R of Denton and rour members from the City of Denton. Unless ' f that condition was written in as an exception, the urdinance would superceed the current requirements thus all members would be required to be citizens of the City of Denton. Alexander motion, McAdams second to amend the ordinance to exclude the Airport Board from the residency requirements up to three memoers. on roll vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Gorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' boyd 'nay,' and Mayor ' Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried with a 6-1 vote, Ayer motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance as amended. On roll vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'eye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Gorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,• and mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously. 6. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution by the City of Denton, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit an amendment to the amendea statement submitted November 26, 1966, to the Department of housing and Urban I Development of a final statement of objectives and projected 9 use of funds with appropriate Verifications, as authorized and required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. f a? The following resolution was cohsideredi ' RESOLUTIUN hU. H67-UJ9 r A USQLUCI0J Bi THr: Cli'Y OF UEN'1'tJM, TEXAS, hQTHUR11ll4'J a,j .i - 1114 CITY iIANAUzA 'i0 S1Url AXIU SUBMii AN AMEND:10T '1`0 x' t ,t 'a I'Hi AMENDED 51'ALE,'1c Yi SJUAlfefU UUVSM6S R Lb, 1946, 9'U > )ry; 'iR4 UEPAitTMENT OF HOUSINU AND URBAN D1tV40.V?h1!Jk OF A r * FINAL 5TATErIEN'I VF UddtiC'i'IYES AND Pi(UJECTEU USE Vi' FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE VENIFICAiluiiS$ AS AU'iHVA%1LU AND RiyUINeD by 'iHE HOUSING AND CVrlMUNITY uEVELU PiiF N'I ACT OF 19740 AS AMEND4U. McAdams motion, hopxins second to appruVe the resolution. On l' roll voce, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Cotton 'aye,' Ayer "aye,' boys 'aye,' ens Ilayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried unanimuusly. 1 T N Y~ 1 9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell# City Manager, presented the following items. rl A. The DISD ;lint luncheon had been set for July 1957 at noon in the RedbUd Room at TWU. ' H. NTSU had asked for a joint meeting with the Council to review their master plan and long-range activities, Potential dates Were the 22, 24, or 25 of June. Consensus of the Council was that those dates would not Work and directed the City Manager to discuss alternate dates With NTSU. 1 lU, Theta was no official action taken On 9xecutivt Session items of legal matters, real estate, penohnel or board I appointments. L y ~ aA 'ra 1 I',. r1 4 P 1 S l I' .r t! 1^ i f City of 7enton City council minutes June 16, 1987 Page 11 s 11. !New 9ustneast The follow:ng items of New Business wets sugyeated by council 9 Members for future agendas: { A. Council Member Alexander asked ror a report on the existing City policy dealing with mosquito control. B. Council Member Alexander announced that on Thu-ad ay night a meeting of the Steering Committee for the eler ion of the hospital Llstrict would be held at the First Methodist Church at 7:0U p.m. 12. The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board 4 a ppointments. More specifically to discuss legal matters of the mattereurto hofoldDenton vs the Cit of discussion rCgardl g Soard Denton anand personnel d Commission appointments. No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was aalourned. 1 , r ! ~ I RAY ST'EPMEN i MA OR f ~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ',;i JENNIFER HALTERS 1 CITY SECNETAMY ~1ar CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 115 Is i ' i r 1r 1. a•° 1 r' 7b94C til. js4;. .1 14 ! 'rs' e y , . 4rt. dii , ~ ^u a Y 1 rl ~s ' F 1 4 y ' } , F 1 J , 1 1 4 ,ii ,1 ,a 1~. ~ r CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. 'carrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Presentation of Beautification Awards RECOMMENDATION: 3 The Denton Beautification Committee wishes to award the Morrison Milling , Company, 319 E. Prairie, recognition for significant improvement through landscaping. SUMMARY: Mr. E. W. Morrison, Jr. has made significant improvement in the area of Bell and Prairie with the perfection of colorful native E shrubs and turfgrass. The landscaping adds greatly to the aesthetics of the facility and has continued to be maintained since installation. BACKGROUND: I This facility was nominated by the Beautification Committee and selected by a panel if judges. EPARTMENTSOR GROUPS AFFECTED: r=; PROGRAMS, D _ FISCAL IMPACT: 4SP FULL S ITTE rti \ acre City manager ~ It Ad by: '.!Fkr Robert K. Tickner r; Title 5uperintbndent of Parks Approyedi same Title 2633C/3 sr I r CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Presentation of Beautification Awards t j RECOMMENDATION: The Denton Beautification Committee wishes to award Mr. U. J. Ramsey recognition for his property improvement of landscaping his home at 1301 Greenbrier. j SUMMARY: 3 Mr. Ramsey was nominated for the award by the Beautification Committee and selected by a panel of judges. BACKGROUND: Mr. Ramsey spends many hours perfecting a variety of dlant material at his home. This personal effort is certainly a credit to thn surrounding neighborhood and the City as a whole. Through his efforts, he has made a positive influence on others and has contributed to the beautification of the City. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: FISCAL IMPACT: ' ;F c { RESFE LILLY SUBMITTED: - J //44Y Cit Manager, Pre ed by: r` ame Title Robert K. Tickner ,,uperintendent of Parks Approved: r' Name Title E. 1 1633C/3 i DATE: 07/21/87 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT t e TG: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 73.334 ACRES OF I~ LAND BEING PART OF THE M. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417. (A-43) I ~ RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation on August 12, 1987. SUMMARY: The annexation of this property will enable Miller of Texas, Inc. to include the property in their zoning proposal. In the City's opinion it will assist in establishing more uniform city limits ihd correct city limit areas where property was omitted from previous annexations. BACKGROUND: Property has been annexed since 1984 in this area in conjunction f with several zoning requests. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; ?I Planning and Development Department, departments providing City services FISCAL !ACT: No analysis has been done with regard to the annexation at this time. City services will be provided to the area. b r. v t"Y 4~.2 ly submi d; A Prepared by; arrell ge r CA' Q4t Cecile Carson Urban Planner Appro d; Jeff Meye Executive Director for Planning and Development 19418/1 c 1847L 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS 6N PROPOSED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and f Incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the it Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, formallSpersons ~ot interested In the above proposed annexation, At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons Interested In the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the 0C day of y 1987, at 7:00 o'clock Y. A:. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all sucA persons shall have the right to appear and be i. neard. Of all sail matter: and tnings, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. RAY ATTEST: R k A-43 } t „ s ti A-43 ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated In the M. Forrest Survey, Abst. No. 417, Denton County, Texas, and rare particularly described as follows: BE6iNNiNG at a point in the present city limits, said point being the southeast corner of the tract described in Ordinance 85-210, Tract 4-0 said point also lying fr. the east boundary line of lot 6, Bloch 8 of the subdivision of said survey, same being the wes4 boundary line of lot 1, Block E of sold j subdivision, said point also lying in the north right-of-way line of an east-west public road known as i Slagg Rd.; THENCE south 30 10' 11' east along the east boundary line of Lot 6, Block B, crossing sold Blagg Rd. a distance of 47.63 feet to a point lying in the south right of way line of said Blagg Rd., same being the northeast corner of a 71.782 acre tract described in a deed to Murray W. McNett and wife, Irene McNett recorded in Vol. 436, Pg. 221 of the D.R.D.C.T.; THENCE south 20 56' 35' west along the east boundary line of said McNett tract same being the east boundary line of Let 6, Block 8, passing at 2236.16 feet, acre or less, the southeast corner of said McNett tract, same being the southeast corner of said lot 6, $lock 8, same being the northeast corner of a tract described in a deed to Gary Miller, trustee. recorded in Vol. 1677, Pg 562 of the D.R.O.C.T., and continuing for a total distance of 2266.16 feet to a point for earner lying In the existing city limits as established by the tract described in Ordinance No. 84-98; THENCE north 850 09' 17' west along said present city Iinits, same being the south boundary line of said Lot 6, crossing an east-west public road known as Trinity road, and continuing for a total distance of 1384.74 feet to the southwest corner of the McNett tract, same being the southwest corner of said Lot 5, { said point also being an inner ell corner of said Martin tract; THENCE north 020 49' 29' east along the present city limits, same being the west boundary line of said McNett tract and lot 6, same being the east boundary line of said Miller tract, passing at 2247,94 feet, i more or less, the north boundary line of said McNett tract same being the south right of way line of said F. Slagg Ad., and continuing for a total distance of 2295.27 feet to a point for corner lying in the north right of way line of Blagg Rd., same being the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 85.210, l Tract 4-8; THENCE south 850 54' 35' east along the north right of way line of said Bligg Rd. and said present city Y limits a distance of 1383.92 feet to the Place or Beginning and containing 73.334 acres of land. s. 1r. 6 I i1 i 1 A.. i PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: I. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, 1 s and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate :i study and traffic standards. B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire f'_ghting force, will be provided in the effective date of annexation. r , _ ,as C. Eater (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use q( will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance y,'-- with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas. E. Refuse Collection ' (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the y,iE annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. . I 1: ! Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets I (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous , chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, Installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing bodyi,ciwiesllfbehacccomitplished under the established G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning i! (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective r' date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area, I, Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city. J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. K. Electric Distribution { (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for I electric power. f Service Plan Annexed Areas page three 4 L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas ~a based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the + upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation, In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same „ established criteria as all other areas of the city. r i' w't r -S I 8 r? i•~{ i b ~ br, to I UNIVERSITY eb si ` a..,! f ` I t 1 II•.tro •43 A-44 .44 -y. A.4 s•~ •.J • Elk e! d s AI4NEXA?ION iCNEDULE A-43 Jul), 07, 1987 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearings July lU, 1987 Notice published In Denton kecord Chronicle for first public hearing July 21, 1987 City Council -first public hearing July 14, 1987 Notice published in Denton Record Chronicle for second public hearing August 04, 1987 City Council - second public hearing ~.I August 12, 1987 Planning and Zoning Commission makes T recommendation August 25, 1987 City Council institutes annexation ~ i August 30, 1987 Publication of ordinance in Denton Record Chronicle October Ob 1987 ~ Final action by City Council i xe .,i i 2; ar, ti i a' I' n f i I I DATE: 07/21/87 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT I T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager S SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 2,822 ACRES OF LAND BEING PART OF THE M. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417. (A-44) i RECOMMENDATION: { The Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation on t August 12, 1987. SUMMARY- The annexation of this property will enable Miller of Texas, Inc. to include the property in their zoning proposal. In the City's opinion it will assist in establishing more uniform city limits and correct city limit areas where property was omitted from previous annexations. BACKGROUND- . 1 Property has been annexed since 1984 in this area in conjunction with several zoning requests. r. "i OROGR)M5, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Planning and Development Department, departments providing City services FISCAL IMPACT; No analysis has been done with regard to the annexation at this time, Respect ly submitted: ' a tel Prepared byi City anager OA u' (A Ca k ,O , Cecile Carson Urban Planner . Appro d: , 'r { Jeff Meyer Executive Director for Planning and Development 1941s/3 e } 1849L E NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION i k NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporatod by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the Cl y Council J of the City of Denton, Texas, on the 7/lr day of 19872 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City council Charib~t owe Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall havo the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council j of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1987, it 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City ouncii Clam ers o Elie Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said natters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. V KAI 1 ATTEST: I I I i I ER T , CITY05ECXETM 3 r A-44 i I All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated In the M. Forrest Surrey, Abstract No. 417, Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point In the present city limits, said point being the northernmost southeast corner of the tract described in Ordinance 64.98, said point also lying in the southernmost north boundary line of a tract of land described in Ordinance No. 87-050 ( Correction Ordinance of Ordinance 85.219, Tr. 11); THENCE north 20 34' 03" east (north 40 58' east, by Ordinance No. 84-961 along the easternmost present city limits is established by Ordinance No. 84-98, same being the east boundary line of lot 5, Block E of the N. Forrest Subdivision, the west boundary line of Lot 6, Mock E, passing at 678.77 feet the southwest corner of a 1.793 acre tract of land described in a deed to Tom Prouty, Trustee recorded In Vol. 1755, Pg. 495 of the O.R.D.C.T, and continuing a total distance of 1321.77 feet to the northwest corner of said 1.793 acres Prouty tract same being a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers monument Q-313W, for corner; THENCE south 230 25' 50' east along the northeast boundary line of said 1.793 acre Prouty tract, same being the southwest boundary line of a tract of land described in a deed to the City of Dallas, recorded in Vol. 195, Pg 573 of the O.R.D.C.T, a distance of 490.89 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers monument l~ Q-312W, for corner; ! t THENCE south 340 06' S4" west along the southeast boundary line of said 1.793 acre Prouty tract, sa being the northwest boundary line of said City of Dallas tract, passing it 232.82 feet the southeasmet corner of said 1.153 acre Prouty tract, continuing for a total distance of 269.96 feet to a U.S. Army E€ Corps of Engineers monument Q-311W, for corner; THENCE south 330 jl' 1f" east along the northeast boundary line of a 0.544 acre tract of land described its a deed to lcm Fruuty, Trustee, recorded in Vol. 1770, Pg. 404 of the O.R.O.C.T, same being the southwest boundary line of said City of Callas tract a distance of 281.65 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers monument 0-310W, for corner; THENCE south OO0 35' 13" west along the easternmost boundary line of said 0.544 acre Prouty tract distance of 12.77 feet to the southeast corner of said tract, same being a northeast corner of the present city limit as established by the tract described In Ordinance No. 87.050 ( correction Ordinance of Ordinance 65-210, Tr, fl) for corner; a THENCE north 870 21' 78" west along the south boundary line of said 0.544 acre Prouty tract, same being said present city limits, a distance of 181.91 feet to the southwest corner of said 0.544 acre Proc.y tract, same being in inner ell corner of the tract described in Ordinance 87-050 (Correction Ordinance of Ordinance go. 65.210, Tract III for corner; THENCE north 050 23' 06" east along the west boundary line of said 0.544 acre Prouty tract, same being said present city limits, passing at 242.28 feet the northwest corner of said 0.544 acre Prouty tract, and continuing for a total distance of 241.94 feet to the northernmost northeast corner of the tract described to Ordinance No. 87-050 ( Correction Ordinance of Ordinance 85.210, Tr. 11) for corner; THENCE north 840 43' S0" west along the northern most boundary line of said present city limits, e distance of 40.24 feet to the northwest corner of the tract described in Ordinance No. 87-050 (Correction Ordinance of Ordinance No. 85-210, tract 11) for corner; THENCE south 20 4S' 31' west along said present city limits a distance of 264.28 feet to a point for a corner in the north boundary lire of a tract described in a deed to Tom P,oryty, trustee, recorded in Vol. 1798, Pg. 216 of the D.R.D.C.T.; THENCE south 10 31' 28' west aon g said present city limits a distance of 58.50 feet to a point for corner In the south boundary line of said Prouty tract; THENCE south 20 06' 21" west along the west boundary line of the present city limits a distance of 335.65 feet to a point for corner some being an inner corner of the tract described in Ordinance No. 81.050 ( Correction Ordinance of Ordinance No. 85-210, Tract 11) for corner; t 3 THENCE north 870 35' 54' west along the said present city limits, same being the easternmost southeast corner of said PhR tract, a distance of 31.27 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 2.822 acres of land. PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance } annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation. w NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CI'T'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as ii amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed t annexation area the following plan of service: u I. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, E and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- went of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C. Water (1) Mater for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance r with article 4.09. of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Proper%ies in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article '4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection Fervice now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. r ~ i Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two i F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous (;;uckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) ti Will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routino maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on M' the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstructi•:.-k and resurfacing of streets, installs-, tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. 0. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city r r (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation, H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will therf%4fter ' encompass the annexed area. I, Street Lighting "tea (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the ` established policies of the city, J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parka, etc., on the effee- tive da.te of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- d'"," lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. r K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for x^ electric power. ,y ! 4,t.Y r tl F , r p tl { iI' v 4 Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous s (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective F date of annexation, i i II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. IF (2) Impact on the balanced growth pc3+.cy of the city, ' (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the k;°3 upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from ' the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the t~ annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. p , t° k Y . ti Z t n . r, r.L r 41 l~ t } ~ ~ t ( .'err f' der " J t~ i ,9. pi i ~ ~ i.r wyJi~fM.M:iaa. Ana. y .ryV y Y a f i . If 3~ + w•u + 1•--t U636 act UNIVERSITY 'ise6.rs f + l e+ rs • 43 A-44 -z~~a~,•,a,4 1 f eG•/! b e i ~:,,+j+= a 1.100 rl lion Y. te 7F i yr t.5 , ~ ~ ~ look. • 1 * r Y~jCASAY.a+ w f lW awt 3•,/i~ i I ea y a t f ANNEXATION SCHEDULE A-44 July 070 1987 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearings July 10, 1987 Notice published in Denton Record Chronicle for first public hearing July 21, 1987 City Council - first public hearing July 24, 1987 Notice published in Denton Record Chronicle for second public hearing August 04, 1987 City Council - second public hearing August 11, 1987 Planning and Zoning Commission makes p, { a recommendation August 25, 1987 City Council institutes annexation k, August 30, 1987 Publication of ordinance in Denton rf~ j Record Chronicle October 06, 1987 Final action by City Council r .a felt 721 q 1 ~ •,y f A 1 A r ~+1 ~ t'.,, 1 ~ J3l t .rji 1 l n ~ J,i ale ~ , ~ S df ' I to a R S e, i 1 a . iii DATE: 07/21/87 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT t TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager q I f SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 1.834 ACRES OF LAND BEING PART OF THE G. WALKER SURVEYO ABSTRACT NO. 1330. IA-45) RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission will make a recommendation on August 12, 1987. SUMMARY: 7 The annexation of this property will enable Miller of Texas, inc. to include the property in their zoning proposal. In the City's opinion it will assist in establishing more uniform city limits and correct city limit areas where property was omitted from previous 1 annexations. t BACKGROUNDS r Property has been annexed since 1984 in this area in conjunction with several stoning requests. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Planning and Development Department, departments providing City services FISCAL IMPACT• y A No analysis has been done with regard to the annexation at this time, „r Respec lly aubmitt s i; 1 ' oY.Barre Prepared bys City aneger Cecile Carson ks; Urban Planner ` Appro d: . y, Jeff Mey .~o- - Executive Director for Planning and Development 1941x/2 i 1. 1850L j 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the C ty Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the = day of , 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti y Council C o the Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the CitT y ~ou.icil Cham ers o t e Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. I•, RAY STIHEKS, MAYOR i ATTEST: a, FER R , CIT C AR t ~ 't . A-45 i i A-45 .7 i Abstract 1 ALL that certain lot, tract Q?- parcel more of particularly land, lying dand being escribed Situated In the G. Walker Survey, No. 1330, Denton county, Texas, as follows: BEGINNING at a point In the present city limits, said point being the northernmost northwest inner ell i corner of the tract described In Ordinance No. 66-130, said point also being the southwest corner of a 1 tract of land described in a deed to RMB Land Co., Ltd., recorded in Vol, 1851, Pg. 928 of the O.R.D.C.T., said point also lying in the north boundary line of a tract of land described in a deed to David D. Vaughn recorded in Vol. 966, Pg. 827 of the D.R.D.C.T.; THENCE north 870 48' 39" west along north boundary line of said Vaughn tract, a distance of 60.0 feet to a point for corner; THENCE northeasterly the following three (31 courses and distances 60.0 feet west of and parallel to the west boundary fine of said PA tract, same being said present city limits; 111 north 020 02' 02" east a distance of 83.39 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1500.0 feet, a central an,1e of 220 00' 00" and a chord bearing and length of north 130 02' 02" east, 572.43 feet; (2) nortntrsterly along sold curve to the right an arc distance of 575.96 feet; (3) north 240 02' 02" east, 696.01 feet to a point for corner in the south boundary line of a tract of land described in a deed to the City of Dallas by a deed recorded in Vol. 212, Pg. 501 of the D.R.O.C.T.; f' r THENCE north 820 52' S2" east along south boundary line of said City of Dallas tract, a distance of 0.98 feet to a point for corner; dary if 6N ea Dall A ;,I i9E Efee~t~o6aopdirtlfor come ,dsoldhpointtbeingnthe ncrlthwest corneriof said RNBatractpt' a distance of .20 THENCE southwesterly the following three (3) courses and distances along said present city limits, same befog the west boundary line of said RmB tract; (11 south 240 02' 02" west, 698.69 feet to the beginning l angle of 0 and rd of a curve to the left, having a radius beortnq and 1ingth of south 130 02' 02" of west, 1440.0 549.53 feet, s feet; (2}trfouthwester1y2e1o g1sa/d,curveetohthe . left an arc distance of 552.92 feet; 13) south 020 02' 02" west, 83,55 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 1.834 acres of land. .a a . f j C f 1 f n FY I i lf ~'d... I' PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordirince annexing an area; and WHEPEAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1. Parsuant to the provisionp of Article 970a as I amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: 1. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed ' as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B. Fire `r . (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city ' lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the a City of Denton, Texas. M1N` Y D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- I vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective i date of annexation. r' l Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets } y (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous,' chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.' will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. i (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilitieq, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city, i G, Inspection Services (1) Any i!apection services now provided by the city (builu;Oig, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation, H, Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area. I, Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present alty will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. K, Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. 4y" 1 I 14J i r. i 5 Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. bJiscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. s II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to oth.)r areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics. F The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation, In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the game established criteria as all other areas of the city. ii A , I k T Y n v ~ ~ , 1l, f y L~ M 1 (JYI 7 A• ~ I. ! Y f Y s ^r, ; 1 C ~J Yt ) . YRbA•M \qJ, 114 11 4 n'~ s6z • .t.~.~~ 1 U%36 ' f, &i -45X e1r•=6 04•=b 1 UNIVERSITY E d6•tt I N.w~ •43 I M~M ...N A•44y _ 1. 1 r pol' * .w - l • 44 .I A-4 \ ? ee elo f 04 ~ as•lil ~ 1 I f ,Vb ' J l• t y 4.A I a6'M I 1_ t Vai lk ~ J 4 Vii.. y ~ ~ ~ c~/Y9~~ momm~ -WZti 4 • tir •ii 1 , N'I ~ i 0' ! ~fMnrro.~w 1 , 4 s k ear ANNEXA110N SCHEDULE A-45 ? July 07, 1987 City'Co4ncil sets date, time and place for public hearings July 10, 1987 Notice published In Denton Record Chronicle for first public hearing July 21, 1987 City Council - first public hearing July 24, 1987 Notice published in Denton Record Chronicle for second public hearing August 04, 1987 City Council - second public hearing Ali,;ust 1Z, 1987 Planning and Zoning Comioission makes recommenda.ion August 15, 1987 City Council Institutes annexation August 30, 1987 Publication of ordinance in Denton Record Chronicle October 06, 1987 Final action by City Council :i i. I , 0 A,il r j °RRa~ry i. i i •A9. DATE: 07/21/87 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY/FINAL REPLATS OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE MINI-MALE, ADDITION, LOTS 4-7, BLOCK A ' RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning C,unission recommended approval of the f Preliminary and Final Replats of the Golden Triezgle Mini-Mall I1 Addition, Lots 4-7, Block A at its meeting of July 8, 1987. SUMMARY: I l BACKGROUND: 1 EROGRAM DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: FISCAL IMPACT: Respe elly submitted: rr " Prepared by: C! Manager L Denies Spiv f- Urban Planner 1. APpro d d , Jeff iSsy Executive Director for Planning and Development n t. 19588 ~ x'•11 d Y Y S r i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: July 21, 1987 F SUBJECT: Preliminary/FiNal raplats of the Golden Triangle Mini-Mall Addition, Lots 4-7, Block A SUMMARY: This 4.5 acre tract is located on the east side of Loop 288, north of Colorado Boulevard. The property is zoned light industrial (LI) and commercial/retail development is anticipated. The purpose of the replat is to relocate lot r {,r lines ar,l craate one additional lot. A 120 water line and 8" and 10" sewer lines serve the existing subdivision. An additional f;. C r 6" water line is proposed to serve the new lot ~L aJr arrangement. Electric and gas services are available. hCTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary/final replats " RECOMMENDATIOt1: The Planning and Zoning Committee recommended approval of the preliminary/final replats of the Golden Triangle Mini-Hall Addition, Lots 4-7,Block h at its meeting of July 8, 1987. ALTERNATIVE: )approval ATTACHMENT: Redrnrid plat t ' Y yjL r r' 05540 ~k r 'I n Y' I ,Ag9 \ IIx11sr TII. LI N 99'17'M' Y 10. h' OJ 1 „ WPUIC 0[xL0 M Kitlli ~ L7 Y0'11./1.1 KH' L7 N 17'11'19' Y 77, r' 6 1 1 u r IN + r r n r r ,r INS LI 1 110,04,60, Y 17.0' 7l U Y Y9' 0'01' 9 M 14• LIGHT USTAfAL N AC. 3 La 108. 7' 2 AC. I~ Ch N.CO 0' y I/r 9 \ \ LOW ION wr 94.60' x " \e s t~~. \ OWI ER /o1N. c At Lr . LTOP c \~YIn.MY \ ' p'~"O.?9~! A\ \ . L E 07 HILLTOP LwLr' TAOPHY CLUB, TEXAS / Ya1r a / \ 76262 ~WL ~ ~ ~ / ~i ~ ~ GOLOEN TRIANGLE MINI-MALL AOO I T I ON PF eL I M I NARY FEPLAT b \ % / \ ? ORIGINAL LOTS 4 THROUGH 7, BLOCK 4 i~ 70 PROPOSED L073 4R THROUGH 6R, BLOCK A \I \ \ N ' ~ \ ` \ t40/ 7U/iKi '7![ y k 1 \ 1`4 \ \ ~ FQJ7Y it rILL01 COPNH. Tmull g ` \ 8 I ~ ~ \ 7A r D.B!? AC. \ 0.96! Af\ ' w\\ \ \ LIGHT _IN:A17TNt; • 7pNIN0s J r D LAMBERT suRV£Y A-784 1v ~1 C ETROPLEX ENGINEERING CORPORATION H+7/! rltle+AW' rRr7ee #"V /41 1 ALAANIA4' Y BIAlrrrjw S NOTM 1 L M w r 71Yf} Itr rltrM/r Y 1111r N4A -71F11r Yen9 w•//r /1/ . fount IPM Pin 11iY Y#UI tl M rIMYI 1ui NwYiff{~ /rNUM IW 7~rwR1 1 . sew PIA Y7 N ~ 100)l v YnR tYMw171 a ~IrOI .riY-rte OY4INIMM'f M1111 . NI Kula 0!1 oftop . "rlLtM GOLDEN 1AIANGLE MINI-MALL //4 Lint 1.711/r.MYI 1~1181 9w9a Moto r 0 7M Y911N 994 O on ' LOTS IR 7`410M OCK A • TYI 1MAN Lt01 /47 IYMMl10~ 1811. 1.1M AM tY 1 1. W11011 kNKM 0.794 0 J. T 111Yt1' 17DG 111MMM yyYY U , ' U /N~/ 1.81 wObe wwotn PMc%w Moo _8111. KALE GATE J01 IAT. LO MMMOM OW" l0j Imo.. PIP UM Ir/n r rRx7 x otOrco...Y[. 60' LS JUtr l0e IBOINB a n„!:xrr... e....... r..., ,+~r'~.s;art,Ay.41~Pefl~/'.••~~..Yl W~EGtEZ9.N7A{erL'bl0~]s:" . ~7sIl:T.AM+•••i1..rw"::~79d.r, v ,r.y` y e r r i p ,p .I .IC.TIYN It ITT OF ISI ad ` / U p ii 20' O'r 1 cnvnn o Li DIN TOM AMrlel 1 9 0 No.LI11. , Live I'll Ae.'ud Y IN ...911 •f t heel N Ned 1el 11 IM a Tell A NO I O.4 1.1ow'114, C1w a11 Tun, De Inn NlN At Dnl I OW wl Ina Id . C . ~ n[o mra Ie V.I.. tuM 114J, b151L Dead Aun4 p n1 Ca.e 10 Il N aw IN alw Nler to. 41, F1,1--leal's TOM 6o,L,Al1A • • .H\~ HRd A N IN Coldi l Trlwlll Kai evil Aldrtul 4114.1 N mod IN Cllidn r, tilde IH N 911 two L1 N 00-03'04' A 10.17' a C / a \ I.:.,dl 0 N111l C...". Tneq led w410 w" toll, dial Iwo 41 fellecr It A11'41'41.4 11.14' 41 'I, oilmmet FOP r"III ann✓I1e MO he lot 1'11141 Nl,laa Ido I J-IIA Ilk, et 11e 11 LLM"INLIdLC L1 N I7' 14'01' A IT. A1' pia ITYr i / Jr. 10 Ib .a, tynl.If..,r Ilw, If Ift NIL A T. eullwd 'ad IN' Nat rwo ef'wq ✓ Iuu N,n.e1 " 11 N 70.04'00' A tl, 11' \r~► Leer 311, rlyd tad., .1w Fell, the wall mad, if Lee 1, IIRI A. Odlaet TI Wil-M,A Ale," l1 Y 01'0'0/' Y n TV or, • i'~ in,nw Nuie r Irn P 1. 71 Wndl Jan Oka IN Walk tIfFNL.n of VI 14L 4 T. A~'\'• f1 _P0 l'ueed a wove n .1 216 l11.ne b I lend 111, lack eNr fn Wv1; pp 1 r° y ldp at :IfaF in,n,. IaW1 N hpo, 11 •"e4 It Mleen 1111 N4' 111 ado Ilw J x11 Oe11rd 1r4gM1 W16WI II + J Alemrn, 1 4NUeu df Ip.b fw, r I hnl ]pNel nN, In Ohd wlNm ww d Oe In" Nlq Iwo A A Ir,n llr/ :nel1. Y111w1.. NIt11b b11NNl wleel e/ Ln L 11RL A N NN IddrtleN 4'N 15 YC \ leten Nat1 11 41ne1 41 0N'a" N Weld. 011 .III 111 brill lled if 0Y Ildi,lld I .Utica Or a ~I;~FA I4'= 41, i \ let To fee Io I I...A W 1..& 1Mr Jw IN wetl.nt are. N OI IneI1 divelNl Irq Kid M., ` li IL♦'J \ t 4'[S" ,4'`i / \u' AIR r 91,1NINJ Ne Naive am eww N Lee 1, IIRI A If do 11 INWdr ~/Aa11seN Y~ Cp 01';li' 1\ y\\`'1,178 AC. R TMn.. Neill00 rlnn 01. " e01 41141 N.41. yeatlik Ike INwool 1114 fftI I1Q11 FAA "I \\\I`[rL \ Iry1'q ° Yrdo \\4 ,d I ,l I e Nun1 lI'll ocal l.0 nl IN 1 o II iedl 1 ad 1. As Ie IAI NN I Ad a NI " if Q e a a \I4' Al If N Jeddl Covet No ll wren IIw N1NI elt it'" Wn Y 1 11n1 II tied M kill .1114 NIM Y N ku~ \ W 0 NIL Id'nl .10, N Ike Irlnq n wa.M U rn1d. dell NrN{ 4'1 Iluuw N Ndn1 \IS N dgnn O! Nrmm 01 NNe4 Mdol 410 Itlt IX, Id, R 604' 031451 \1\\ i6 L' 4 $Ry M. A, itln[t Wr,lwooullr tool NY N"I 4't nl l l Ad 10111 INI N 1 fool 14 IIIY rows to w i L• I06.q7' = \ 1 J 0.233 AC. 4A wulMnl core' art" L IIn1 A It do11 NeI1NN INC IN wI lA paid r„Y t- 76.63' 9 1 \ 's Ch-N.00-ON' We r If \ b\ ^ 11nfI NmAN111rnQ lIYIwNNwrd ANIMA IN.M I11dNYH 1A 1101 wN INI If Lr1 01.601 4 L•11 r' 0.. Swl A 1 dlelenw of INN fool Y 1 loved India NoW IV III Vi Nor N Ohio Null ` S, \ ! dnerrad 11,11,01441n'W., INteool.mw1N N Lw Ca MW now of LaI J UA 41 IN rat d \ I,1n.If..1l 0 Lae: 11, 6R 1 1. \tw [ul,wAl e fell ell Nicoll INN do,;:" IN II NurN 11 OeMb [w Ilk r 0.791 AC r.Ih alMaf .10 11 I., TII6 divi at \ \ \ ; . i `1 TI N,uNNpalq Ml uluYN, .IN lnpa el YLL LN' \ L11' j / Q { \ / / .'1 NON. TNSIII IOR; FNON' ALL N[N IT iXi11 rA1J[NT1 r•rd sell. / f'N14Vv 111WI, TN. t, Lr. C N , dr"d .n. 1m11 adult 4'Y dnln11 i l Iepal01.1 O or ,A l Cole do t` '`b1L~V l .>t10 06 Len "WO IN. block A, 0111,. Wnfdldll ll .4. ad p,IN, Deals, d P.," ` T„r old d a. Mall de dr4Kelc N IN PIRI OYNA l, II W f.,Mw lA1 W11 Ohe NINA IM "llN rreMlY re, 111 wM rUNN 14'A, i \ J / ILI MINOR "1,A \♦:b~ y4~ + .~i ,w a 4',N 11 rAVAN Nal14 ,TJ p ITATI OF TOW 1[Np opmc<ale 44'1 4 -0 p NARA An0 If1WT/[AIIYINf SA I d 011N.nlpw Nlnrl blood Ida M Inu If to," was Ike, nl ",kill, IANI'll C i t,4'• C Al.r n1,141.a w milk W br111 -MINI Adopt Y ww I I1m N111 fwple{ WIN.•41I IN \ * I4' 1,NOvi b w Mdl N nnN1N ,11 doM fw dl no" IN RNIdnaIW INru 111.14.1IN IN N IN ca"I'll 1111.9 N` efflOOY nl~lolcr INI, 0 \ b 01•n udnq mid IN wlof 9 BR 7R 0 \ \ 0,967 AC. i ' 19111 I till Total 0.617 AC. \ , \ j ' n, t'Wdo1Y N Nrlrr ~ r t ` Ls \ IulydTell c uTdrte.T■ 1401 ALL JOIN IT TN11[ re O1NT5 l• 1'[kI1t 0AN0 91„1 ?NI L $1Wn1 NIVIIdotN. lwW" N/IY twwlR, do ININ wIMI 1111 Mod n4' NI 110114Iw .T----...-- N ,Q wool rttre•N bdr 11 ItI.ll 111 M d"Is NnN will NO the MALI 1.4 met {N MN PIN 10060 INS b' \ too 44 tuqytr LINI tell,...IN 14"1 .,tit 01 NNr'Ybl N IRfIcal NIO MI tle. ,1 4 . 11 Im 1911 r D• iellmRT nfo?ver A-lea In" bI'med NNY 1 IerNlr MnM 1111 { wool N IuYI Un i{ REVISED NETRO014 E0 .04AAR AS CORPORATION © FACnved7Na l IcArovfw . eulvtrt~ Ltl[IQ 1 ~ IIO rNt e1l'N MIl7 10f1b1r woo t.JN 71► • AMWI Irln AIA ml/i.J 111$ AMA? Pill K Ail No la if1 • {N Jrdl Ia • l11111 ot I'IMe WIER GOLDEN TRIANGLE MINI-MALL A4DN. -4 • 11,111 L[n1 It T- • rrwt ugt lw rpq__ LEN' AIC97 N LOTS 44 TKAOUSH SWBLOCR A tNl 1 •1• 10 - [lT11lt10rCn ow LLIT 407 HILLTOP 6510 ACOCI IN 1 llnl 1 n n W L NL I4' fN l4' W • NMN011 ® CA.M[C ICALI IN NITIAI Ti10PHY CLUE, MIA I. t.►t IIAfr1T A-717/ 0►0~ . Aa.el' M/II Not AA 75262 LA • Light poll 1 I r n in N N N to T b w LN fON NrLIML DNA", NN IULL' OAit150 IM We M 1S I trKCNID. ..It l eCLM LLn1 LOCAttON eLr Inm NnLn F. IN 11".9 M o" r Nqn Ve, 50 AM 060N1! 1 .Nil r.~.. ,;Iii IIUZE.e.lx«t...4ui7f4'~'#~lJKS~fatMgl~xKhl'lM1tit °""NV"r•^~.- 11M~71NS5R61YOCB1WkLIII1L'►','P~~AIYN.1+1Kr0Ns'YNlnn:N:Y.1wc ':I cirY of DINrON D<NrON, rrXAS 76201 DATE: June 29, 1987 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician THRU: W, Jay Anderson, Controller SUBJECT: Approval of Tax refund for First Gibraltar Mortgage RECOMMENDATION: Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued, SUMMARY: r Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. Taxpayer, First Gibraltar Mortgage, has requested a refund in the ' amount of $521.11 for double payment of property tax account number 6693-02800, C r BACKGROUND:~ First Gibraltar Mortgage paid taxes on account 6693-02800 after this number had been reported to them in error, they have no interest in this property. The property owner, Mr, Bruce Millar, paid taxes on thie property on May 290 .a, 1987, Our records indicate a total of $1,071,72 was paid against a 1986 tax base of $521.11, First Gibraltar is s requesting that their payment of $521,11 be refunded to them, FISCAL IMPACT: ° $521,11 to be refunded. r n1 ~ ~ „F Respectfully submitted, 17 c or Schnei or 7 Tax echnician fA) " I W. Jay derson Control r at..";r~ ,....,..y,, , 110und Apple Apvla.wy°n aeire S1,11(I1 l!) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Collecting Office Name: - City of nanton max Of f i e Collecting Tax For, f ax ng n is 1 NI Address City, Stab, ZIP Code rrrr.wrww-r-rwrwr-rrrw rwrrr_rwr---rr-r_-i in order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided the taxpayer, IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER: i Name: FirRt rlhral*ar Llnrtaa/fnr Rr„n Address: 4004 Beltlina Suite-10'. 1 Y~~ 75~R1 near, TelepAone Number (if additional Infoematlon Is needed). Fe. na ndo rt na P. 14 4 qR Qann 1 IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: DeserlptionotProperty; _Kin¢aton Trace Spc ion Fllnrt V Lot ,Ft, Address or Location of Property: ?9ot Kinectnn Tr r.w Account Number of Property: ssA? n~ADD or Tax Receipt Number, INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Is A"u"ted Is R"uested Tax Payment Taxes Amount I, Tax Refund C~if-n,~rnn Requested 2. .,°~,~~n19 -12-3 i521.11 S _521.t1 86 = _ 550.81 S - _0_ 3. 1g - /19 j /1g S S' 4 f ' Tax payees reason for refund (attach supporting documentaflon): Erroneous dayment by mortgagA company, "I hereby apply for the refund of the above4escribed tax" and certify that the Informadon I have given on this form is true and correct" June 29, 1987 Signature Date of Application for Tax Refund -----------------r-r-r_rrrr--r-r-_ DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Dleapproval Signature of Authorised Officer Date ,i Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Date Unit(s) for refund applications over $600 Any penes *he makes a false story upon the two olne record shah be nrb)ed to ens oHM IoeoreYN panaNMS; I. ynpAseemem of not more than 10 years nor lea than t years and/or a lane of not more than $1,006 or both seoh Lie and Imprlsenmath Z. tonflnemeM In 1811 fa a term up to 1 year or a 11ns net to exceed 112,M or troth such One and kepAeoniow asset Forth In 11"don 77.10, Penal Code, y , ~ avur~o s.... 30 h COLLEMIONS . I I FIRST GIBRALTAR MORTGAGE CORP. i May 19th, 1987 City of Denton Tax Office 215 East McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 f ~ REs Account FCW Loan 40710-44816 j ('0 E 5 Dear Sirs, On Deoenber 22nd of 1986 our office submitted a payment in the amount of $521.11 for the 1986 City taxes on account $R31969(137284). Our Realty Tax Agency reported this account number to us in error. We Ask you to please issue a refund to us so we may credit our accounts acoordingly. I &n enclosing a copy of our cancelled check and a copy of the detailed disbursement sheet showing the account paid. ro " Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. p r . i .R . S ys r f ,r r 1 Y r Fernando Pina Tax Department v~ r r~ r l ~ 14 National Headquarters: 4004 Beldine, Suite 100 + P.O. Box 810199 a Dallas, Texas 75351-0199 • (214) 45&9200 !'t: A SLUMP Of 6M MIM SANK N.A • b tai, Vt '~.~yM a+Mgl4 w1 1f ywti.L4 y'.d h.,r+...awr,r . .na. '.Y.Wlr.♦+ .'~~''E•'I[R a °i a ~ fl 7 ~'Ej~J 1~ ?7 cr tr r► Or 11~~ r' 1711 ti'1 ~~17 Oki 10(04'o R n TOTAL 521 1f~ ~ f r ~ . 1 w 777777, of ;i 4' C< , . J _3 . _ _ ♦ 'w dPys. r,arhq A1:11R'T.di'NW /~''~w~ y;,,ei~~(I,F'#~"~M'.tA~Y..rF>~k~. ak.:dd iiN:a tda ~0 .n Ci.!iii~• ~ • • . ~ jff FIRST GIBRALTAR MORTGAGE CORP. r en© 4;.A SE.%4E Si 'E 1-'0 DALLAS 1ExAS '5244 4~ 2 ~ t r r : t i a 59 GD9J "i X7447 e~ { PAY TO THE ORDER OF C11+ QF Drk7r +I ?1~ f "f `1kNFT tF1+Cti Tr Tl2C1 is[sS21 41 FIRST GIBRALTAR MORTGAGE CORP. wsroo A l G4 At TEar CilAIIJINO ACCOVNI ~ VOID ~o At Tim so DAYS oA.l BANK OF AMERICA L0~7~«t CA W J~7NJ 1 ~ W 2ED E A'0t5000 1:1 2 200066 11: 1123501,11458904 000000052i~too 1~Y ♦ t Ff+) !i Y f k ri YD'C7130N► 601 6+ Y5 a IN 17fE1YY1 Ia lIN1a 77 ro ad 1INV0 Arlo Avo 7In 77T ~df ' b r yI f I 1'. r,r rr M•71Ty',Jq/w j I i e 1 t a S E wry of DENTON DENTON, TH"S 7"01 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of City Council ; k FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician THRU: W. Jay Anderson, Controller SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund for James R. Neblett RECOMMENDATION: •%a Tax Technician recommends that tax refund be issued. SUMMARY: Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. Taxpayer, James R. Neblett is due a refund in the amount of $657.59 for ' an overpayment of property tax account number 8000-1200. BACKGROUND: James R. Neblett was billed an original 1985 tax base amount of $909,23, which he paid on January 13, 1986. On September 22, 1986, the Denton Central Appraisal District corrected the acreage amount on his,account which lowered his tax base by $657.69. Our records indicate a total of $909.23 was paid against a corrected r base amount of $251.64. This difference of $657.59 should be refunded to Mr. Neblett. FISCAL IMPACT: $657,59 to be refunded. Re^pectfully submitted, s ,Y Victor Schneider Ta Technician W. Jay nderson Contro er . i i /O- 7- f6 , jY f 1985 SUPPLEMENT TO: l'1~ 1- Q ~11n PROM: DENTON COOUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT D NTaNBO EXA 281 76201 y~ OWNER: _bQQ~ : ~.ux 0 ADDRESS; LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ,~1 ,r i DISTRICT ACCOUNT#: ~IL14~ d arb- ~ ,moo ~ CORRECTED VALUE: PREVIOUS VALUE: Q~ LOS OR GAIN. i ~ 6.5 ~ SIGNATURE: COMMENl'S:.1 Q 1 a 0 r dd XLb~~ @~., i REQUESTED BY: 1MR- j I ~ i h i j =!MIAM E CH ICK{ FAYAILE M Y OF DINTONTAK DEPARTMENT f AVG* -A000UNTNUTA mis NAME TOTAL 909023 34240 YOUR CANCILLID CHICK It YOUR RICEIII f PLEASE RETURN THIS f STUB WITH PAYMENT i f a 1 •``'`:,~i . 1 i . ,j 1 Y .'l 1 I IIKI ' .......~..r 1 . S.Y. ~ { Y • P C 3. DENTON, TEXAS 70901 CITY Of DENTON I rj E M. O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of City Council 1 FROM: Victor Schneider, Tax Technician THRU: William J Anderson, Controller SUBJECT: Approval of Tax Refund for Claire's Boutique RECOMMENDATION: Tax Technicianrecommends that tax refund be Issued- Tax SUMMARY: s res t Chapter 31,11 of the Tex%s Property Tax Cede requunit the approval of the governing body of the taxing for refunds in excess of $500.00. Taxpayer, Claire's Boutique, is due a refund in the amount of $944,00 for an overpayment of tax account number 9020-02607. BACKGROUND: . n i Claire's Boutique was billed an or~ Marcha18191987gx Onse of $1,050.1e, which they paid Appraisal District April 29, 1987, the Denton Central App made a value correction on0u~i~ecordanind catelswtotal the tax base to $106.16. of $1,050.18 was paid against a corrected base amount of $108.16. The difference of $944.00 should be refunded. FISCAL IMPACT: 4 $944.00 to be refunded, Respectfu3ly submitted, .9. Victor Schneider Tax Technician , An C An erson Controll r ~ ; , , - , • .,..E „ ~E i s-x-81- Q~ 7-sI-G~iw 1986 SUPPLEMENT ' TO 41 FROM: DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT P.O. BOX 2816 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 OWNER: SO* ADDRESS: t LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DISTRICT ACCOUNT#: a CORRECTED VALUE: r + x r`, PREVIOUS VALUE: _ 17 ~J. Y q ~3 dr R CAIN: /COQ D D D #p~7' w SIGNATURE: i X; COMMENTS: f REQUESTED BY: 060.11 i v ~r 11 ' 3 18 ~3') ~r o r~ lAXt~ir r i MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO. .S CITY OF OENTON TAX OEPAR}MENT o, OY i 1 YOUR CANCELLIO CHECK 16 YOUR RECEIPT i PLEASE RETURN STUB WITH PAYMENT • i ~t { 1 I ! i+ 4 1 N' 4, 1 rya,y... a t.! a a f 4 r t. ei a CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T4: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Maintenance agreement on Financial System Software Package known as "LGFS". f i RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve the annual maintenance agreement with American Management Systems, Inc. which provides 12 months of Software maintenance on the Financial System. The Data Processing ' Advisory Board recommends approval. SUPirV1RY: This agreement provides the City of Denton with changes, enhancements and problem solving assistance with the Financial System for the next 12 months. e n - Ao BACKGROUND: h 9a, 3 r j~~ ?F ' Minutes of the Data Processing Advisory Board Meeting of June 30, r.~ 1987. Invoice from American Management Systems Inc. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: x a: l Finance Department, Utility Department and Data Processing a f x`` Department. FISCAL IMPACT: : '71 1 $32,250.00 of budgeted funds ~a. Respectf fly submitted: i '01 Llo Harrell y.r City Manager Prepared by: 1, 4 ry, r 1 `4 r`fi, r(/ o imei~" Affd t f t s Approved: i 'L y E 9~PYI'AR i~M.iNMiilvw'ANi^71Vd°+vi,{,ti.^'J.h.!,JcRr:J+' I. MINUTES OF DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 30, 1987 Members Prescott Jim Kuykendall { Dale Maddry Ron McDade Members Absent: Charles Riddens j} Others Present: Gary A. Collins of the City Staff Jim Kuykendall made a motion that the minutes of the May 13, 1987 meeting be approved as written. The motion was second by Dale Maddry and passed unanimously. Gary A. Collins explained that the maintenance ak 'ement with Control Data Corpor- ation was a continuance of the annual maintenance agreement for Payroll /Personnel System known as EIS. This maintenance agreement entitles the City of Denton to j all System enhancements, Tax changes and problem solving relative to the EIS 4( System for the next 12 months. Gary Collins discussed the importance of this maintenance agreement in light of anticipated changes associated with the COBRA r and INS legislation. Jim kuykendall made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend that the City Council approve this maintenance agreement. Dale Maddry second the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins discussed the need for the annual maintenance agreement with American Management Association for the financial system known as LGFS in light of potential changes to the accounting practices required by the auditor's and regulatory j agencies as well as the acquisition of the extended Purchasing, Inventory, Job Costing and Cost Allocation subsystems. Jim Kuykendall made a motion the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend that City Council approve this maintenance agreement. Dale Maddry second the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins opened the discussion of the position paper on the acquisition of y Microcomputers by stating that the current policies do not specify a particular brand or model of personal computer. Additionally, Gary Collins explained that normally when a review of requests for a personal computer was conducted that the functional capabilities desired by the requester required an IBM 3270 PC or compatible type machine. Gary Collins did explain that the last two personal computers acquired were Nang personal computers and of the 3 personal computers being requested in next year's budget 2 were Wsng computers and 1 was an IBM 3270 personal computer. Dale Maddry indicated '.,a did not see where the current policies created a problem in acquiring personal computers other than IBM 3270 personal computers but if the practice vac to only acquire IBM 3270 personal computers I then he could see a problem in justifying this equipment. Gary Collins explained that the current policies set out the standard features and capabilities associated with personal computers but did not met forth specific equipment as evidenced by the City's acquisition of Wang equipment. Additionally, Gary Collins explained that the acquisition of personal computers have gone through the normal bid process. Gary Collins also explained that additionally, there has been some discussion among the Data Processing Steering Committee members in having a longer payback period than 24 months, which has been the practice to date. Ron McDade stated he felt that the 24 month payback period should be maximum length of time and if an application was not justifiable in 24 months it probably should not be put on a I` personal computer. Dale Maddry asked if under current policies and/or practice Y i page 2- ADVISORY BOARD MEETING JUNE 30, 1987 i F could not someone install a computer other than the IBM 3270 P.C. Gary Collins explained that while the intention of the policies was to establish standards for the personal computers acquired by the city the policies did provide for the acquisition of non standard equipment. In practice the requester of this non standard equipment is informed that this equipment will not be supported by the Data Processing Department in regards to connectivity to the mainframe or compatibility with other personal computers. Additionally, Gary Collins explained li that the City has experienced difficulty in getting service on the non standard equipment it has acquired such as Osbornes, and Coronas. Dale Maddry said he thought that standards should be functional in nature and if the hardware speci- fications did not require a certain vendor there was not a problem. Gary Collins indicated that this was the situation as evidenced by the acquisition of Nang f equipment. Gary Collins also indicated that after reviewing requests for functional needs and adding in 1RMA Boards, Windowing software, Spread sheet software, Modems, hard disks and other components that the equipment costs generally are comparable to the IBM and Wang equipment costs due to the 30 • i discounts provided by these two firms. Gary Collins summarized the points of the position paper. I There being no further business the meeting was adjourned, r, F T } f Y y ft~ i lr~~ ~'f )X 1 p l 4 ~ 1 1. ~ 1 A Leh. Y 1 f y . 4 ~ ] h ,F .witniaiia...rs.in.t.x.r.-.r..~.uai ..w4+,. ~..,r ~..r,,da...... ~ ' if I American Management Systems, Inc. C'j%41 V'Li June 4, 1987 --1 Mr. Gary Collins Data Processing City of Denton 324-B East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mr. Collins: Effective August 1, 1987 the LGfS maintenance support for the City of Denton expires. Under the License Agreement, the City of Denton is entitled to purchase maintenance support from A14S for additional periods. Some of the benefits LGFS clients derive from purchasing on-going support from AMS are: )y e Delivery of annual enhancements to LGFS along with complete installation instructions. I Delivery of new modules which have been developed by AMS or other users (i.e., reporter, automatic check reconciliation, 'what 1f' budgetiing, etc.). I Updates to LGFS documentation. w S e , a Continued active involvement In the Users Group (one of the main sources for developing enhancements lists). I Support with the development of new report requests using 4% provided report writers. e Hotline support of LGFS processing logical questions. We would like to continue to provide the City of Denton with enhanced versions of LGFS as they are released. Per your contract the maintenance f fee for LGFS is 15% of the prevailing price list (attached). Remittance of the attached invoice will provide the City of Denton with LGFS maintenance support for the 12-month period of August 19 1987 through July 31, 1988. j If you have any questions, please call me at (703) 841-6731. Si ereiy, ee Ross Mdnager, Product Support 1fl7 North Ken! Street • Arlington, VIrgkda 22169 (703) 6416000 ~ Tdn 64636 ~ Ars-A*rbxk AMSiNC Realonal Offktt n: Map Denver • Houston New York San Frandtco , Local Government Flnanclal System (LGFS) IBM Verslon - LGFS PLUS PRICE SCHEDULE 1. SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES PRIG! LOFS PMa: CXS/VSAM CKS/ADALU XOCtO dCSADMS OdN mD tlOp IDIlS DS/DC 223 OOp OFriotw: RaedAwb 2250 1 2S IIOD I CafABoc m SDAEO j >ID OOD laves ~ Wwiis$ 90,OOD i Wd GAO vom ulnvw,Meby wt ZSA00~ Oletr h4'a~+ 30 W&M 10,000 PCM i Wmk Orde kr limb wflhmd Job Cwdn/ 6eC Wank Ordff 1w CMmb %iLh JobQsdns Flee! Manalrrnl 30= Disownta: Op& m an oflaed d &wowled fem .ilh L" The e+,l ton O01 opEa+ Is dl+oanld five M paant; the wewd, _ PrMt the 0+Ir4 tVtem f15) pervert; and thelourth and wrDuquml al tvveruy 00 paoenf 2. TERM OF LICENS E AN D RENEWAL The iatHd term of the ]Jenne L MV (30) yeah. At the end of this MW foal, the Lio nfee guy tenw the Lkene annudy fora fee equal b two(!) percent of the Initial Ucwlse fee. 3. MAWENANCEANDWARRAM NWJ~ The "Item Is wwranld /or one O)year from tM data of deiWery of the N*wam An opNoW annual m9nieniam !en ce prroMes ccontInud wwwly, wnudwim and annual Mesa nd oAnwd annual mAkdwAm an FAM 0 pwtw °f pw41wj BMW IN far LGFS. 4.OWALLATM AND SUPPORT pu b e u w Ikw =x b be wed as the ellen! denies for tnintnS ooK~ Aww two provldd by A o pu tw CD awe of &D operNioro ditur laacvo+ention and standard aaininE gufr4lf w alto cpoNa Addhbru WO be btl)fd b Licruee at S aa, htahs 44 [en p01 peno~ /w for "s drd adndniftbrad nhl3 and wppolt wig be prov{ded Vdeelnd, ml atandardAATS rahn br eonu)tlnE »evk en Ehe currant raM bti ><7Sp perr beta. i 1. TERM OF PAYM@ff OF $"AAR U010w PER A. 06% of Bonne fee upon exec &o of U mwe AV"aw d and de4wry of donmtata m & 13% of bcenae lee upon deH"h~ C. Contractual ha, Open" and 6mlo loradditiostd d &;O any t M ps W treat oI t D. A Anna he of two (2) peram per aroruh wW be dw /or aawttn n°! peJd wkALl t" k"n DJ days of des daea. EFFEaNE1M1KtIt,Ng MINCESStA1AC1'TO*wwWMIOt NOTNX ' CeeprNe Nebwar+ne 1 ryy MuM keM SeeN A,nnSte,,, MlaE (7qJ [M1t40s wtw roar w $MAO^ A aectoo. a tauarac n ttlelHldaop dlsfKYfa as 01272Orni PIJO moo petefaroO" NawIfIOIae101 rW40o,d O3*P4 MOM r 1114 14fl 3* P40 s 1 American Management Systems, Inc. 1 i June 4, 1987 Mr. Gary Collins Project No: P2649 Data Processing City of Denton 324-B East McKinney Street Dneton, Tx 76201 INVOICE x LGFS Maintenance Fees for August 1, 1987 through July 310 IS88- LGFS S 269?50.00 Fixed Assets 36750.00 Fixed Performance Measurement ?•250.00 °r x 1 TOTAL INVOICE $ 32.250. 1 ` Y , r5r 1 tteoss Manager, Product Support PLEASE NOTES PAYMENT MUST dE RECEIVED EY JULY 3!, 19816 Please make remittance payable to: American Management Systems, Inc. c/o Lee Ross, 10th Floor 1777 North Kent Street Arlington, VA 22209 + n1n i' ! 1 t a~ + x- e r ~ S t~ ti ~ 1 # IM North Kent Street • ArlinIton, Viroli 22209 a (703) 64140M a Telex 64W • Mswerbeck AMSWC Regional OR** W Majo a Denver a Houston • New t rk a San Frencima r CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMA' E TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Maintenance agreement on payroll /Personnel Software Package known AS "EIS". RECOMMENDATION: s The City Council approve the annual maintenance agreement with Control Data Corporation for 12 months of software maintenance on the Payroll/Personnel, The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval. SAY: The cost of this maintenance agreement is ;20,000. This maintenance agreement provides the City of Denton with changes and enhancements M ! + associated with the Payroll/Personnel system as well as problem t r; solving help In the operation of the software. 1t s , I y ~a ,1 v ,s1 ` BACKGROUND: t3" Minutes of the Data Processing Advisory Board meeting of June 30, 1987. Invoice from Control Data Corporation work order with Control Data. r~.~l:t r a PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Finance Department, Personnel Department and Data Processing 14. p ar r ` x y i Department, . FISCAL IMPACT: ` $20,000 of budgeted funds 'r Respectf submitted: J ~or y +p Lloyd Harrell " City Manager P4e& red by- 1 , , ti m, ame an t M! Approved: _ r MYIU«+1 I; y S MINUTES OF DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 30, 1987 Members Present: Jim Kuykendall Dale Maddry Ron McDade Members Absent: Charles Riddens Others Present: Gary A. Collins of the City Staff Jim Kuykendall made a motion that the minutes of the May 13, 1987 meeting be j j approved as written. The motion vas second by Dale Maddry and passed unanimously, f Gary A. Collins explained that the maintenance agreement with Control Data Corpor- ation was a continuance of the annual maintenance agreement for Payroll/personnel System known as EIS. This maintenance agreement entitles the City of Denton to all System enhancements, Tax changes and problem solving relative to the EIS t System for the next 12 months. Gary Collins discussed the importance of this maintenance agreement in light of anticipated changes associated with the COBRA and INS legislation. Jim kuykendall made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend that the City Council approve this maintenance agreement. Dale Maddry second the motion and it passed unanimously. i Gary Collins discussed the need for the annual maintenance agreement with American Management Association for the financial system known as LGFS in light of potential changes to the accounting practices required by the auditor's and regulatory agencies as well as the acquisition of the extended Purchasing, Inventory, Job Costing and Cost Allocation subsystems. Jim Kuykendall made a motion the Data Processing Advisory Board recommend that City Council approve this maintenance agreement. Dale Maddry second the motion and it passed unanimously. Cary Collins opened the discussion of the position paper on the acquisition of Microcomputers by stating that the current policies do not specify a particular brand or model of personal computer. Additionally, Cary Collins explained that normally when a review of requests for a personal computer was conducted that the functional capabilities desired by the requester required an IBM 3270 PC or compatible type machine. Cary Collins did explain that the last two personal computers acquired were Wang personal computers and of the 3 personal computers being requested in next year's budget 2 were Wang computers and 1 was an IBM 3270 personal computer, Dale Maddry indicated he did not see where the current policies created a problem in acquiring personal computers other than IBM 3270 personal computers but if the practice was to only acquire IBM 3270 personal computers then he could see a problem in justifying this equipment. Cary Collins explained E that the current policies set out the standard features and capabilities associated I with personal computers but did not set forth specific equipment as evidenced by the City's acquisition of Wang equipment. Additionally, Cary Collins explained that the acquisition of personal computers have gone through the normal bid process, Cary Collins also explained that additionally, there has been some discussion soon$ the Data Processing Steering Committee members in having a longer payback period than 24 months, which has been the practice to date, Ron McDade stated he felt that the 24 month payback period should be maximum length of time and if an application via not justifiable in 24 months it probably should not be put on a personal computer. Dale Maddry asked if under current policies and/or practice I i Page 2- ADVISORY BOARD MEETING JUNE 30, 1987 a s i could not someone install a computer other than the IBM 3270 P.C. Gary Collins explained that while the intention of the policies was to establish standards for the personal computers acquired by the city the policies did provide for the acquisition of non standard equipment. In practice the requester of this non , standard equipment is informed that this equipment will not be supported by the Data Processing Department in regards to connectivity to the mainframe or compatibility with other personal computers. Additionally, Gary Collins explained that the City has experienced difficulty in getting service on the non standard equipment it has acquired such as Osbornes, and Coronas. Dale Maddry said he thought that standards should be functional in nature and if the hardware speci- fications did not require a certain vendor there was not a problem. Gary Collins indicated that this was the situation as evidenced by the acquisition of Wang { equipment. Gary Collins also indicated that after reviewing requests for functional 13 needs and adding in IRMA Boards, Windowing software, Spread sheet software, Modems, hard disks and other components that the equipment coats generally are comparable to the IBM and Wang equipment costs due to the 30 x discounts provided by these two firms. Gary Collins summarized the points of the position paper. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. J Ir 1 ` l a I ° ":11~ th /1.., it ~R V 1 ~~l e fr R ~ \ r 4 x4 r• r \ Sir r I F.r v~ r; 'f \ 7` t r r r' z ,.t' c: _ I Control Data Corporation NO11 TO +NSURI PROPER CREDIT To YOUR s ACCOUNT, PLEAR IDENTIFY PAYMENT fY fF { p. 0. Box 100185 COMM THE OOMPLM INVOICE No ON YOUR j REMITYm NCE OR ATTACH A COPY Of THIS Atlanta, GA 30384 INVOICE. t @ E)CONTPPL DATA A/C #008-24-664 INVOICE NO. 52V 9957 DATE: July 1, 1987 i CUSTOMER INVOICE TERMS: NET CASH D10 ENSTAUEDAT City of Denton 324-A East McKinney , Denton, TB 76201 , f, pATE PRI ND CUSTOVIER INO. PATE EHw® st`-ri NUAyA 41421102 L~ I aNa CONTRACT TYPE NAT TAR CODE ps GM2102 GAZ ~Q(etson 41G0001 THE 08 ITEM OUAMITY PRODUCT SERIAL W MSER DfSCRIMICN M- OR fAn AMOUNT 4r l~ Invoice for Level It Employee Information System Maintenance k for period 07/01/87 thru 06/30/88. $ 209000.00 l ,r A y 'y[S a " i ~T TV `try ~ KS w. T'~i K V i rr ^ } r EI .T`z4 C. i.; S " fEV. wa c E. S txRaEa SUS TOTAL ti $ 20j000.00 TAX % a CUSTOMER TOTAL DUI 201000.00 r M rTw~i LAST AMOM AASOA7 aEV. a lit « 14IroRd In U 6A. 1 CLIENT ORDER FORM INI Abl~+dl AnMnd. N0. OMA I.0 IIO. PA No 401 CLIENT MWIE 5-13-87 City of Denton 870513 001 IINOIGNO WMESS M Qalaad Man Ap KI SIMP t0 ADO"E SS IA DAIavA from SAN STATE bp CITY Gn !♦TATE gtE A00"E SS (M4400 FW A. gue"O6 rim) "W O~da Add On Ordw a'av::",M OBOE" ME IIY CITY 711 I lbawd IAdw Lloa Md Mweew 1) SAt TV, IM,In U Ana Mal A- • ❑ YwoCUM City of Denton~ Mqu I ti ~ a 1 a V_ ollins I THE j~ tICEMEIEE Krow Director Data r0c• =190 T oaE 7 varell r IAnlrw oESC"I►T+ou "M..,. r' l Maintenance for the Level 11 x 20,000.0 I Employee Information systems including tax maintenance r' it I E I °MM"rM.a" AAMIcwl?Am$ TOTAL ZO 044.0 UM OIMI F&"v Avww* tww4w Mww" Aaw*m M MWMaww A/MMdM AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY VENDOR ' ,a ...v - a „ ,y of laf 'il,X`fitd1~'THI~gS ~A~`a.-._^. a OAl'~+rawr,K+enx.:..: =.s..r..r;.,~tu•,.+r w. 1.; id~w...~..s s«s.ifa. ..,b'4.. >w ra, P'h `:.t Mf F- i I 0923L NO. N ORDINANCE PURCHASE: OFI MATERIALS, EQUIPHENTAN SUPPLIESN ORA SERVICES FOR THE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i has solicited, received and tabulated WHEREAS, the City materiels equip- j competitive bids for the purchase of necessary accordance with the proced, ures of I meet, supplies °r services in ; and state law and City ordinances has WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee reviewed and recommended that the herein de sui iment,bisuppliestor i lowest responsible bids for the materials, q p services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted thereE~nfor WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget ro riation of fund to be used e vicesr apthe proved cande p accepted the aPD P ment, supplies or s materials, equi herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: numbered items in the following numbered or services, shown in SECTION I. That the , bids or matorials, equipment, supplies o are hereby accepted and the "Bid Prposals" attached hereto , approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER N0. VENDOR AMOUNT - 12.57500__ 4 62 _1-5 as EnvelpDe Mfa. _ 9765 1-4 Te*~le Inc. ~.566.0.. h- r- K• ,i t1l 1 SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting " approve an accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager E or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written ' contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein, SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ► 1987, RAY E E , MAYOR a 'CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: JENNIFER TER , CITY SECREMY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE 'TWO DATE: July 21, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 1 FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager ~ SUBJECT: Bid 0 9762 Envelopes RECO141ENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of Teas Envelope Mfg. at an estimated total of $12,575.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for envelopes used by all departments of the city. The quantities bid on are estimated annual totals. The successful bidder will deliver quantities as needed by the City of Denton. P' BACKGROUNDS Tabulation Sheet f" PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED' Budgeted accounts for all departments. VM FISCAL IMPACT: 1986/87 Budget funds for working capital inventory 710-043-0580-8703 5r r Respectfv y submitted: U zo/ Lloyd Harrell ' City Manager r ,F~ r cyr Prepared by: + r' Name: Denise Manning Titie: Buyer ` APproveds ohn Marshall iti!! Purchasing Agent ez BID 1 9762 BID Envelopes Accurate Teas Curtis Coopers Federal FJ U3 Moores Envelopea Envelope 1000 Copies Envelope Forms Envelope Business OPEN July 9. 1987 Corp Mfg. Co. Westvaco Forms ACCOUNT I T ITEM I VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR E E VENDOR VENDOR 10.68 7.5 12.66 15.00 7.18 20.66 11.10 17.31 m Utility Return 00 16.0 17.00 8.88 13.35 15.61 19.64 10.00 .2 10.77 10.97 11.35 -3--.= M 111A plat" A.75 10.PS 0 10.4 12.14 11.82 15.69 .62 13.20 14.5T -I Estimated Total 12.575 120728 Delivery 35-45 15 days 21 days 10-15 day 30 days 21 days y , 4 r DATE: July 21, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT a TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Bid 09765 Wire and Cable RECOIVENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification, Temple Inc. in the total amount of $65,566.00 FOB Denton with delivery in 6 - 8 weeks. SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of electrical distribution wire and cable. This material is replacement for warehouse stock and the quantities are estimated to last 90 - 120 days. A is 1~ 1 Rir.. ~.'V e, gpCppURp; Tabulation Sheet. ~M ham' ~ ~ I.. y 9 c ^;"yr~ PROGAAM5. OEPARTPUTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:, Warehouse Inventory t y Ay~" DY1. 1 15 Ik .gyp FISCAL IMPACT: 1986-57 Budget funds for working captial inventory account number 710-043-0562-8708 Respectfully submitted: tk by Harrell IPr, City never y st yrt, P ared by: n '~~O S~-Y NeDne; Tors Shaw, C.P.M. K ' Y Title: Asst. Purchasing Agent Approveds E t r J sha11,C.P.M. i; ~t1tt VEirchasing Agent , ...E BID # 9765 BID Wire and Cable OPEN 7/14/87 Temple Wesco Nelson Cummins Preister Graybar Inc. ACCOUNT # QTY, ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR 1 m' 795 MM 222 12 7 .768 0 .775 2 Om' #2 Aluminum 0 .097 NB .0959 .095 .10 3 ' Triplex 2/0 4 .491 .57 ..496 24 0 4 250 P.659 2.772 2.61 2. 6 6- vk wks 10 days 6 da s 0 days 8 vks Total 66.0 90,378.00 168.578.00 2 340.00 Conditions 2& 1 2 1& 1 6 2 All or All or All or All or None None None None -w....-w......: b.-. i.... ...r..nu.r i:x.#. rn?,.Y:.. _ a .....:n.n:... r.n-... ..m.. _......+xrtYMMMAL.wM,. I I~ 1 . 1 Ir 1804L ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 17 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ("PLUMBING CODE") TO PROVIDE FOP ADOPTION OF THE 1985 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE; ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE; TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONS THERETO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN AN AMOUNT OF $1,000.00 THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section 17-2 of Article I of Chapter 17 of the Code o rdinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) The Uniform Plumbing Code, 1985 Edition, and Appendices A through I thereto, as recommended by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, a copy of which shall be filed with the office of the City Secretary as Document No. 4 and shall be available for public inspection, is hereby adopted and designated as the Plumbing Code of the City of Denton, Texas, the ~~7v same as though said edition of such code and the appendices s thereto were copied at length herein, subject to the additions, deletions, and amendments enumerated hereafter: i (1) Delete Part 1, Administration ' (2) Amend Section 209 to read as follows: rq`' Back water valves shall have cast iron, brass, PVC or ABS bodies, non-corrosive bearings, seats and self-aligning ~r E discs, and shall be so constructed as to insure a positive mechanical seal and to remain closed except when dischargin wastes. Such valves shall remain f sufficiently open during periods of low flows to avoid screening of solids and shall not restrict capacities or cause excessive turbulence during peak loads. Unless otherwise listed, valve access covers shall be a bolted type with gasket and each valve shall bear the < manufacturer's name cast into the body and cover. (3) Amend Section 3IS(f) to read as follows: { No soil or waste pipe shall be installed or permitted outside of a building or in an exterior wall unless adequate provision is made to protect such pipe from freezing. All water piping which runs in an exterior wall, attic, or crawl space shall be adeqt.ately insulated f to protect from freezing. (4) Amend 317(a) to read as follows: F i No requirements. (5) Add Section 317(e) to read as follows: { All underground lines shall be run In separate ditches and shall be separated by a minimum horizontal distance of thirty (30) inches except that water and gas lines or water and sewer lines may be run in the same ditch when all of the following conditions are met: y 1) Ditches are dug at least eighteen (18) inches wide. 1) water and gas lines or water and sewer lines shall be at least twelve (12) inches apart measured horizontally between outside surfaces. `r 3) when gas lines are steel, wrapped, or extrusion- coated to prevent corrosion. h " 4) The bottom of water lines at all points shall be at least twelve (12) inches above the top of the sewer line and the water service shall be placed on a solid shelf excavated at one side of the common ditch. 5) Each line must rest on undisturbed or compact earth. (b) Amend Section 318(b)(2) to read as follows: Media. The piping of the plumbing, drainage and venting systems shall be tested with water or air. The administrative authority may require the removal of any cleanouts, etc., to ascertain if the pressure has reached all parts of the system. After the plumbing fixtures have been set and their traps filled with water, they shall be submitted to a final test. All fixtures, r~) designed to retain water, such as lavatories, sinks, bathtubs, laundry trays, etc. shall be filled with water " to the overflow level and shall retain same for fifteen r (15) minutes without leakage when requested by the plumbing inspector. r (7) Amend Section 401(a) to read as follows: (a) Drainage pipe shall be cast iron, galvanized steel, galvanized wrought iron, lead, copper, brass, ASS or 1 PAGE 2 i 1 PVC laving a smooth and uniform bore, except; E 1) That no galvanized pipe shall be used underground and shall be kept at least six (6) inches (152.4 mm) above ground. 2) ABS and PVC DWV piping installations shall be d limited to those structures permitted to be of Com- bustible construction. Combustible construction is defined by Table 11-A of the Uniform Building Code, 1985 edition as Building Construction Types III0 IV, and V. 3) ABS and PVC DWV piping installations may also be used in Type 11 construction where the occupancy classification and building size are such that the structure could have been built using Types III, IV, or V construction. 4) ABS and PVC DWV piping limited to those structures nth ele t(3)sstoshall be ries in height or less, (b) Drainage fittings shall be of cast iron, malleable iron, '0 lead, brass, copper, ABS or PVC having a smooth interior waterway of the same diameter as the piping served and 7:4 all such fittings shall conform to the type of pipe used, t 1) Fittings on screwed pipe shall be of the recessed drainage type. Burred ends shall be reamed to the full bore of the pipe, k~ 2) The threads of drainage fittings shall be topped so as to allow one-fourth `1/4) inch per foot (20.9 mm/m) grade. Illy ~s r; (8) Add Section 406(1) to read as follows; Cleanout fittings shall be not less in size than those d'4 given in Table 2.3. Cleanouts serving residential buildings of not more than four (4) family units, where located outside the building in unpaved areas and within three (3) feet of the building exterior wall line, may be terminated six (6) inches below finished grade; and all such Cleanouts shall be provided with a brass disk, not less than one inch In diameter, stamped "CO", and "g attached to the building wall with a concrete nail twelve 4 (12) Inches above the finished grade directly in line with the cleanout. Cleanouts located under cover plates shall be so installed as to provide the clearances and accessibility required by this section. Cleanout cover f PAGE 3 IPA. r I 1 plates in floors shall be two piece cast-brass type, arranged for flush mounting. (9) Amena Section 409(a) to read as follows: Drainage piping serving fixtures, the flood level rims of which are located below the elevation of the curb or 1 property line, at the point where the building sewer crosses under the curb or property line, and above the ; crown level of the sewer main, shall drain by gravity Into the sewer main, and shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type of backwater 4< ' valve. I (10) Amend 608(c) to read as follows; No domestic dishwashing machine shall be, directly _ connected to a drainage system or food waste disposer without: 1) An approved dishwasher air-gap fitting on the dis- charge side of the dishwasher; or 2) The waste line from the dishwashing machine shall be looped upward as high as possible beneath the drain board either internally or externally to the machine a and provided with a brass horizontal swing check 1` valve at the point of connection to the sink waste or garbage disposal outlet. (11) Amend 703(c) to read as follows: The site (nominal diameter) of a trap for a given fixture shall be sufficient to drain the fixture : rapidly, but In no case, less than given In Table 4-1. ' , No trap shall be larger than the trap arm to which it is connected. 1~ I (12) Amend 803(f) to read as follows: g °104 7"0; Female PVC screwed fittings for water piping are prohibited except for specialty valves or systems which may be approved for specific installations, such as {l, chemical systems, ductile iron systems, irrigation gtin j systems and swimming pools. (13) Amend 80S(b) to read as follow3: ` I No requirements. { (14) Delete Section 904(b) Connections. l PAGE 4 r, 'E i i (15) Amend Section 1003(h) to read as follows: I Lawn sprinkler systems shall have a cut-off valve at each point where the sprinkler system is connected to the potable water supply and shall be further equipped with an approved vacuum breaker on the discharge side of each cut-off valve. Each vacuum breaker shall be installed at least six (6) inches above the highest sprinkler head served by it. Systems with zone control valves which allow the vacuum breaker to remain under pressure shall be provided with a pressure type vacuum breaker which has been approved for this type of } t a plication. A manual drain valve shall be provided in the sprinkler system supply line near its connection to the water supply source. A manual or automatic drain valve shall be provided in the sprinkler system supply i line near the discharge side of the vacuum breaker. Drain valves shall be installed in approved valve boxes. (16) Amend Section 1004(a) to read as follows: Water pipe and fittings shall be of brass, copper, cast iron, galvanized malleable iron, galvanized wrought iron, galvanized steel or lead. Schedule 40 PVC and AWWA C900 piping having the National Sanitation i Foundation seal followed by the letters PW may be used for cold water distribution systems outside of buildings. PB water pipe and tubing may be used for hot and cold water distribution systems within buildings permitted to be of combustible construction. All materials used in the water supply system, except ' valves and similar devices, shall be.of a like material, I except where otherwise approved by the administrative authority. f (17) Amend Section 100S(b) to read as follows: A fullway valve and drain valve controlling all outlets shall be installed on the discharge side of each water meter and on each unmetered water supply. Water piping supplying more than one building on any one premises shall be equipped with a separate fullway valve and drain valve to each building so arranged that the water supply can be turned on or off to any individual or separate building; provided however, that supply piping to a single family residence and building accessory a thereto, may be controlled on one valve. Such shutoff valves shall be accessible at all times. A fullway valve shall be installed on the discharge piping from i PAGE S F water supply tanks at or near the tank. A fullway valve shall be installed on the cold water supply pipe to each water heater at or near the water heater. A fullway valve and drain valve shall be installed for each apart- ment or dwelling of more than one (1) family. In lieu of the main supply shutoff In each apartment, individual shutoff valves may be provided at each fixture. (18) Amend Section 1008(£) to read as follows: Unions may be installed in the water supply piping with- in twelve (12) inches (.3 M) of regulating equipment, F water heating, conditioning tanks anc~ similar equipment which ma require service by removal or replacement in a manner which will facilitate its ready removal. t (19) Amend Section 1009(d) to read as follows: Where the maximum length of supply piping is two hundred (200) feet (60.'8m) or less, each water piping system of fifty (SO) fixture units or less shall be sized in accordance with the values set forth in Section 1010 of this ordinance. Other systems of more than fifty (SO) fixture units and within the range of Section 1010 may be sized from Section 1010 or by the method set forth in subsection (e) of the Uniform Pluming Code Section 1009. (20) Amend Section 1009(g) to read as follows: On any proposed water piping installation sized using Section 1010 the following conditions shall be deter- j.` mined: 1) Total number of fixture units as determined from the table of Equivalent Fixture Units (Table 10.1) for the fixtures to be installed. 2) Developed length of supply pipe from meter to most remote outlet= 3) Difference in elevation between the meter or other source of supply and the highest fixture or outlet. 1 IE 4) Pressure in the street main or other source of supply at the locality where the installation is to be made. S) In localities where there is a fluctuation of pressure in the main throughout the day, the water piping systems shall be designed on the basis of the minimum pressure available. (21) Amend Section 1009(h) to read as follows: I PAGE 6 r Size of Meter and Building Supply Pipe Using Section 1010. Knowing the available pressure at the water meter a or other source., of supply, and after subtracting one half (1/2) pound per square inch pressure for each foot (11.3kPa perm) of difference in elevation between such source of supply and highest water supply outlet in the building or on the premises, use the "Pressure Range" group within which this pressure will fall. Select the "length" column which is equal to or longer than the requited length. Follow down the column to a fixture unit value equal to or greater than the total number of fixture units required by the installation. Having located the proper fixture unit value for the required length, sizes of meter and building supply pipe will be found in the two left-hand columns. No building supply pipe shall be less than three- quarter (3/4) inch (19.1 mm) in diameter. (22) Amend Section 1009(j) to read as follows: Si-41ng for Flushometer Valves. Branches and mains serving water closet or similar flushometer valves may be sized from Section 1010 when the following values are ' assigned to each flushometer valve beginning with the most remote valve on each branch. For the first flushometer valve 40 fixture units For the second flushometer valve 30 fixture units For the third flushometer valve 20 fixture units For the fourth flushometer valve IS fixture units For the fifth :lushometer valve 10 fixture units 5 Five (S) fi~cture unit flushometer valves may be com- puted at half (1/1) the above values assigned, but in no case less than five (5) fixture units. After the fifth valve on any branch or main, subsequent fixture unit loading may be computed using the value of the fifth I flushometer. Piping supplying a flushometer valve shall not be less in size than the valve inlet. (23) Amend Section 1009 (k) to read as follows: Sizing Systems with Hot Water Piping. In sizing a water piping system having a total demand of fifty (SO) fixture units or less, the greatest developed length of the cold water supply piping may be used from Section 1010 and the length of the hot water piping ignored when the hot water piping friction loss is compensated for by the following method: i PAGE 7 . l i 1) Compute the total hot water fixture unit demand, using those values given in Table 10-1 for the combined hot and cold water use, j 2) Assign the total demand computed as required in (1) above, as the fixture unit demand at the hot water heater inlet. 3) Starting at the most remote outlet on the cold water piping and working back toward the water meter, " compute the pipe sizing for the system from the column originally selected in Section 1010 using the fixture un[t values given in Table 10-1, and adding j in the fixture unit demand of the hot water heater supply inlet as computed in (1) above, at the point where it occurs. The final size of the cold water branch of main need not exceed the originally established size of the building supply. (24) Amend Section 1009(1) to read as follows: Except as provided in subsection (k), water piping systems may be designed by taking the total length of the supply piping from the source of cold water supply ' through the water heater, to the most remote hot water outlet and assessing flow values of seventy-five (7S) percent of the combined hot and cold water demand as given in Table 10-1, to the piping supplying either hot or cold water to those fixtures served by both. Piping serving water heaters shall be sized to deliver the above required hot water demand, plus all required cold water demands, but in no case need the piping be larger in size than that required by Section 1010, as it presently appears in the Code of Ordinances. (25) Add Section 1010 as follows: Size of potable water piping in residential and small commercial installations. (a) The size of water service lines to buildings in this category shall conform to Table 10-3 below. The water service line shall extend undiminished in size from the water meter to the water heater or if no water heater exists to the first opening. k t PAGE 8 } 5 i TABLE 10-3 WATER SERVICE LINE SIZES N M NUMBER OF LENGTH OF RUN, METER TO BUILDING FIXTURES 0' - 50 Sit - 100 101' A UP 1-05 3/4" 3/4" 3/4" 6-10 3/4" 3/4" 1" i 11-15 1" 1" 16-20 It 1" 1-1/4" 21-40 1-1/4" 1-1/4" (b) The size of water piping within buildings in this category, or branch lines connected to water service lines, shall conform to Table 10-4. TABLE 10-4 a BRANCH WATER LINE SIZES MINIMUM NUMBER OF LENGTH OF RUN OF BRANCH ' FIXTURES 0' - 25 26' - 50 S1' 6 UP 1 1/2" 1/2" 1/2" 2 112" 1/2" 3/4" 3-06 3/4" 3/4" 3/4" 7-10 3/4" 3/4" Ito 11-18 In Iii lit 19-40 1-1/4" I-1/2" i•1/2" (c) For the purposes of Tables 10-3 and 10-4, any fix- ture with a flushometer valve shall be counted as four fixtures, and any fixture or equipment item _i other than a water closet, lavatory, sink, bathtub, shower, urinal, service sink, or drinking fountain shall be considered as that number of fixtures corresponding to the lower limit of any fixture range matching in the 0-2S' category the connection size to such fixture. d e. > (d) Potable water systems serving in excess of forty (40) fixtures or their equivalent as defined herein, shall be designed by a registered professional mechanical engineer. (26) Amend Section 1107 to read as follows: (a) Cleanouts shall be placed inside the building near 'Y i PAGE 9 j ` i k d the connection between the building drain and G building sewer or installed outside the building at the lower end of a building drain and extended to a grade. One additional cleanout shall be installed at the property line and connected to the building sewer in such a manner that it opens in the direction of the flow of soil or waste, Additional building sewer cleanouts shall be installed at intervals not to exceed one hundred (100) feet (30.4m) in straight runs. (b) When a building sewer or branch thereof does not exceed ten (10) feet (3m) in length and is a straight line projection from a building drain which is provided with a cleanout, no cleanout will be required at its point of connection to the building drain. (c) Every change in alignment or grade in excess of twenty-two and one-half (21 1/2) degrees in a build- ing sewer shall be served by a cleanout, except that t; no cleanout shall be required for not to exceed one (1) forty-five (45) degree change of direction or (1) forty-five (45) degree offset. All required building sewer cleanouts shall be extended to grade. When the cbuleialdinon sewers are located under requirements of Section 406 shall apply. Y• (d) Each cleanout shall be installed so that it opens in a direction opposite to the flow of the soil or j waste or at right angles thereto, and except in the case of wye branch and end-of-line cleanouts, vertically above the flow of the pipe. ;l (e) Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or extendinflush with paving with approved materials and be adequately protected. (f) Approved manholes may be installed in lieu of clean- outs when first approved by the Administrative Authority. The maximum distance between manholes shall not exceed 300 feet (41.2m), ' (27) Amend Section 1108 to read as follows: Building sewers or drainage png materials which are not approved for use within a building shall not be run or laid in the same trench as the water pipes unless all of the following requirements are met: ? r 5 j i PAGE 10 3 1) Ditches are dug at least eighteen (18) inches wide. 2) Eater and sewer lines shall be at least twelve (12) inches apart measured horizontally between outside surfaces. ; 3) The bottom of water lines at all points shall be at least twelve (12) inches above the top of the sewer line and the water line shall be placed on a solid shelf excavated at one side of the common ditch. 4) Each line shall rest on undisturbed or compact earth. (28) Amend Section 1201 as follows: The regulations of this chapter shall govern the in- stallation of all fuel gas piping in or in connection with any building o or structure or with in the property lines of any premises, other than service pipe. All service piping- or service lines shall be installed in accordance with the Department of Transportation, Hazardous Materials Regulations Board specifications, { Subpart H, as written in the Federal Register, Volume 3S, No. 161, Part If. August 19, 1970 or as amended thereafter and as specified under Subpart I, as added August 1, 1971. I (29) Add Section 1203(c) to read as follows: } It shall be unlawful for the gas service to be turned on in any huilding which has been damaged by fire without the owner or his plumbing contractor first obtaining a plumbing permit and testing the gas piping in accordance with Section 1206 of this code. ' (30) Amend Section 1210 to read as follows: Where temporary use of gas is desired and the administrative authority deems the use necessary, a permit may be issued for such use for a period of time not to exceed sixty (60) days, provided that such gas piping system otherwise conforms to the requirements of this code regarding material, sizing and safety. (31) Amend Section 1212(a) to read as follows: All gas piping used for the installation, extension, alteration or repair of any gas piping shall be standard weight wrought iron or steel (galvanized or black) yellow brass (containing not more than seventy-five (751 s" i PAGE 11 i percent copper), or internally tinned or equivalently treated copper or iron pipe size. Approved PE pipe may be used in exterior-buried piping systems. j (32) Amend Section 1212(c) to read as follows: All fittings used in connection with the above piping shall be of malleable iron, yellow brass (containing not more than seventy-five percent (751) copper) or approved plastic fittings. Solvent cement or mechanical compres- sion fittings are prohibited. (33) Amend Section 1213(f) to read as follows: All gas piping shall be adequately supported by metal straps or hooks at intervals not to exceed those shown in Table 12-2. Gas piping installed below grade shall be effectivel supported at all points on undisturbed or well compacted soil or sand. Material used for backfill around the pipe shall be free of rocks, building materials, ashes and trash. (34) Amend Section 1307(c)(1) to read as follows: Permanent openings or ducts leading from the water heater location to other interior areas, except unventilated attics, which meet the minimum required volume specified in subsection (b) at this section. Ducts conveying air from an attic space shall extend at least two (2) inches above insulation or other obstructions. The attic space shall be ventilated by fresh air openings or louvers on a vertical wall or at two (2) different levels or elevations. (35) Amend Section 1308 to read as follows: Uninsulated water heaters shall not be installed closer than six (6) inches (152.4 mm) to unprotected combustible construction nor closer than three (3) inches (76.1 mm) to protected combustible construction. Insulated water heaters shall not be installed closer than two (1) inches (50.8 mm) to unprotected combustible construction nor closer than one fl) inch (25.4 mm) to protected combustible construction. The clearances may be reduced j for water heaters which are designed and listed or approved for installation adjacent to combustible materials and installed in accordance with the conditions of such approval. Protected combustible construction will be considered as such if it is of not PAGE 12 q r p Q less than one (1) hour Eire resistive construction covered with a No. 26 gauge metal covering. (36) Amend Section 1309 to read as follows: No water heater which depends on the combustion of fuel for heat shall be installed in any room used or desifned ? to be used for sleeping purposes, bathroom, clothes closet, or in any closet or other confined space opening i into any bath or bedroom. Fuel burning water heaters shall not be located under stairways or landing. ! Exception: Sealed combustion chamber-type water heaters. Where not prohibited by other regulations, sealed combustion chamber-type water heaters may be located under a stairway or landing. (37) Amend Section 1310(x) to read as follows: Water heaters which generate a glow or spark or flame capable of igniting flammable vapors may be located in residential garage:. provided their pilots and burners )r heating elements and switches are located at least eighteen (18) inches above the floor level and further provided that such water heaters are located in an approved compartment having a tight fitting door assembly adequately sealed to retard the entrance of flammable vapors. All combustion air for such instal- lations shall be supplied from outside the building or from a properly ventilated attic space. Water heaters located in commercial garages shall be installed at ' least eight (8) feet above the floor. (38) Amend Section 1311(b) to read as follows: Water heaters located on or in every attic, roof, mezzanine or platform more than eight (8) feet above the ground or floor level shall be made accessible by a 'I stairway, ladder, passageway, trap door or catwalk. } 'I Ladder and stairways shall be permanently fastened to the building. Such ladder shall have rungs spaced not more than fourteen (14) inches (3SS.6m) center to center and not less than six (6) inches (1S2.4 m) from face wall. (b) All plumbing pipes, fittings and fixtures for water and sewerage and methods of installation shall comply with the requirements of the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1985 Edition and the additions, deletions, and amendments enumerated under subsection (a) of this section. i PAGE 13 } r i (c) It shall be unlawful for any individual corporation or association to violate any provision of this Chapter. SECTION II. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force ) when Me provisions of this ordinance become effective which are k inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions con- tained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict. SECTION Iii. Any person, corporation, or association who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit } or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misde- meanor punishable by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars 7 ($10000.00), Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1487 i y 4 1 t 1 v~ t r RAY STEPHENS t,MAYOR ATTEST: I JENNIFER ALTERS, CITY SE-C-RF-.TA-R7 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY J ,M t t BY' ~l<rll fl-~ y, I t y • •I y PAGE 14 °ir MINUTES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board September 11, 1986 ~ $p PRESENT: Pete Work, Bill Burley, Bob Sullivan, Paul Williams, c Jerry Jones and Jackie Doyle, Building Official ABSENT: George Becker I 1. Sullivan moved and Burley seconded a motion to approve I the minutes of September 11, 1986 as written. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Sullivan reviewed chapters 1 and 2. Jones moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to approve chapter 1 as written. Motion carried unanimously. 3. The Board discussed a new federal law which gives states and local governments until June 1988 to implement laws and ordinances banning the use of solder containing more than 2 tenths of 1 percent lead. State and local governments not passing such laws and ordinances will be affected by the loss of HUD funding for projects. fthe Board determined that no action should be taken at i this time concerning this new law. i 4. The Board discussed Section 209 concerning backwater i valves. fhe 1985 code requires backwater valves to have " cast iron or brass bodies. Burley moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to amend Section 209 to allow PVC and _ ABS backwater valve bodies. Motion carried unanimously. 5. The Board reviewed Section 31S (f) concerning the protection of water and waste lines from freezing and j agreed to leave the section as currently amended in the Ii Code of Ordinances. b. The Board discussed Section 317 (a) which prohibits the use of mechanical excavating equipment within two feet of existing piping and agreed to leave this section as presently amended in the Code of ordinances. 7. The Board discussed Section 317 (e) as presently written in the Code of Ordinances concerning the location of exterior water, sewer and gas lines. Williams moved and Burley seconded a motion to amend the first sentence to read as follows: All underground lines shall be run in separate ditches and shall be separated by a minimum horizontal distance of thirty inches except that water „ and gas lines or water and sewer lines may be run in the Motion cch w when all the ,following conditions are met. arried unanimously ;S age 1 of 2 pages 8. Burley reviewed chapter 4. Burley pointed out that the current amendment to Section 406 (1) was not a problem. However, the section number should be changed to 406 (1) to be compatible with the 1985 code. 9. The Board reviewed Section 409 (a), Jones moved and Williams seconded a motion to amend 409 (a) to read as follows: Drainage piping serving fixtures, the flood level rims of which are located below the elevation of the curb or property line, at the point where the building sewer crosses under the curb or property line, and above the crown level of the main sewer, shall drain I by gravity into the main sewer, and shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Doyle agreed to review the 1985 Uniform Building Code concerning maximum number of stories allowed using combustible construction in order to determine whether or not the plumbing code should be amended concerning the use of PVC and ABS plastic pipe, 11. The Board shall continue reviewing the 198S U.P.C. at the next meeting beginning with chapter S. N. Williams will review chapters 9 and 10, Burley will review chapter 11 and Sullivan will review chapters 11 and 13. i Meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. 403161 a:. I . + 4, { I j i i F 1_" N s l t y MINUTES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board September 18, 1986 i PRESENT: Pete Work, Bob Sullivan, Bill Burley, George Becker, Paul Williams, and Jackie Doyle, Building Official ABSENT: Jerry Jones 1. Burley moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to approve the i minutes of September 11, 1986 as written. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Sullivan expressed his desire that sewer cleanouts be required near the curb to serve new buildings and also when existing sewer lines are replaced. Board members R I agreed that a cleanout in this location would aid plumbers and the City in relieving sewer blockages. 3. It was agreed that Burley and Doyle would review Section 401 (a) (2) and provide appropriate language to make clear that ABS and PVC DWV piping is permitted in noncombustible construction in instances where the building code would :;k have allowed the use of combustible construction. Doyle pointed out that noncombustible sleeves should oe 17 used wnere plastic UWV piping penetrates fire rated wall construction. Burley moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to approve chapter 4 as amended. Motion carried unanimously. it 4. After reviewing chapter 5 - Burley moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to approve chapter S as written. Motion carried unanimously. S. Work moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to emend Section 803 (f) as follows: Female PVC screwed fittings for water piping are prohibited except for specialty valves or systems which may be approved for specific installations such as chemical systems, DI systems, irrigation systems and swimming pools. Motion carried unanimously. 6. The Board recommends that Section 80S (b) remain as j presently amended in the code of ordinances. j Work moved and Becker seconded a motion to approve chapter i 8 as amended. Motion carried unanimously. 5 Meeting adjourned at 530 p.m. 0316I r 4 i 1 r MINUTES t Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board September 25, 1986 PRESENT: Pete Work, Bob Sullivan, Bill Burley, George Becker, } Paul Williams, Jackie Doyle, Building Official ABSENT: Jerry Jones t i. Burley moved and Becker seconded a motion to approve the minutes of September 18, 1986 as written. Motion carried unanimously. 11. Sullivan moved and Becker seconded a motion to amend Sec. I 401 (a) (2) and add new sub paragraphs and (137 to read as follows: 3 fj Sec, 401 (a) (2) ABS and PVC DWV piping installations shall be limited to those structures where combustible construction is allowed. Combustible construction is defined by Table 17-A of the Uniform Building Code, 1985 edition as building types III, IV and V. Sec. 401 (a) (4) ABS and PVC DWV piping installations may also be used in type II construction where the occupancy classification and building size are such that the structure could have been ouilt using types, III, IV or V construction. Sec. 401 (a) (,d) ABS and PVC DWV piping installations shall be limited to those structures three (3) stories in height or less. Motion carried unanimously. j 111. Burley moved and Becker seconded a motion to amend Sec. 608 (c) as follows and to accept the remainder of chapter 6 as ,mitten. ? rs Section 608 (c) no domestic dishwashing machine shall be directly connected to a drainage system or fond waste disposer without: (a) An approved dishwasher air-gap fitting on the discharge side of the dishwasher; or (b) The waste line from the dishwashing machine shall be looped upward as high as possible beneath the drainboard either internally or externally to the machine and provided with a brass horizontal swing check valve at the point of connection to << the sink waste or garbage disposal outlet. 4, E Motion carried unanimously. I MINUTES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board October 2, 1986 PAEShNT: Pete Work, George Becker, Bill Burley, Paul Williams and Jackie Doyle, Building Official ABSENT: Robert Sullivan, Jerry Jones 1. Becker moved and Burley seconded a motion to approve the minutes of September 25, 1986, with the following correction to the last two sentences of the first paragraph of item number VII. I! A manual drain valve shall be provided in the sprinkler system supply line near its connection to the water supply source. A manual or f automatic drain valve shall be provided in the } sprinkler system supply line near the discharge side of the vacuum breaker. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Becker moved and Williams seconded a motion to amend Section 1008(f) by changing the word "shall" to "may" in this section which refers to the use of unions in e water supply piping serving equipment which may require service by removal or replacement. Mot iv i carried unanimously. • 3. Tt,e Board recommends that Section 1010 and Tables 10-3 and 1U-4 which do not appear in the 1985 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code be maintained as presently written in the Code of Ordinances with the exception of Section 1010(d) which shall be amended to read as follows: (d) Potable water systems serving in excess of forty (40 fixtures, or their equivalent as defined herein, shall be designed by a registered professional mechanical engineer. 4. Becker moved and Burley seconded a mot;on to amend Section 1009 (d), (g), (h), (j), (k) and (1) of the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code by changing references to j Table 10-2 to bection 1010 as Section 1010 presently c;.{ appears In the City of Denton amendments to the 1979 Uniform Plumbing Code. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. U3221 .rv k i page 1 of 3 pages IV. The board recommends that Sec. 703 (c) be amended to read the same as in the 1979 Uniform Plumbing Code. V. Becker moved and Work seconded a motion to accept the remainder of chapter 7 as written. Motion carried unanimously. Vi. Sullivan moved and Becker seconded a motion to accept chapter 9 as written except that Sec. 904 (b) shall remain as presently amended in the Code of Ordinances. Vil. The Board recommends that Sec. 1003 (h) be amended to read as follows: (h) Lawn sprinkler systems shall have a cut-off valve at each point where the sprinkler system is connected to the potable water supply and ;j shall be further equipped with an approved vacuum breaker on the discharge side of each cut-off valve. Each vacuum breaker shall be installed at least six (6) inches above the highest sprinkler head served by S it. Systems with zone control valves which allow the vacuum breaker to remain under pressure shall be provided with a pressure type vacuum breaker which has been approved for this type of application. A manual drain valve shall be provided in the sprinkler system { supply line near its connection to the water supply source. A manual or automatic drain valve shall be t provided in the sprinkler system supply line near the discharge side of the vacuum breaker. µ Drain valves shall be installed in approved valve boxes. ~e Vill. Becker moved and Burley seconded a motion to amend the third sentence of Sec. 1004 a to read a ( ) as follows. YB , 'j water pipe and tubing may be used for hot and cold 71 1 water distribution systems within a building Motion carried unanimously. r IX. The Board recommends that Sec. 1005 (b) be amended to read as follows: (b) A fullway valve and drain valve E controlling all outlets shall be installed on the _ discharge side of each water meter and on each unmetered water supply. Water 4 ping supplying more than one building on arty one premises shall be equipped with a separate fullway valve and drain valve to each building, so arranged that the water supply can be turned on or off to any individual or separate building; provided however, that supply piping to a j single family residence and building accessory f thereto, may be controlled on one valve. Such shutoff valves shall be accessible at all times. A fullway valve shall be installed on the discharge piping from water supply tanks at or near the tank. A fullway 2 „ page 3 of 3 pages valve shall be installed on the cold water supply pipe to each water heater at or near the water heater. A fullway valve and drain valve shall be Installed for each apartment or dwelling • of more than family. In lieu of the main supply shutoff in n each apartment, individual shutoff valves may be provided at each fixture.. ar meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. U321I r if c , r S v r: u Yrtrl 1 wM ~F 1 , t y; i'1 y vvl ' r 1 r Yryl ~,y er pyP1 'VS l X}, V I l i *~1 ~ 1 ~ jY ~ yy pyt~ 114 1 r F9 1^ tib i!.i t t ~ dy { T 1 R 1 1 "~~~~w ..i l o l": 1 4...i . l Y.. }n `.11d Mh.~[i1's . . V } P fir 4 ' 4 { aE`~ 1Y A Off' j r. l MINUTES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board October 9, 1986 fi PRESENT: Pete Work, Bill Burley, Paul Williams, Bob Sullivan and Jackie Doyle, Building Official 4 ABSENT: Jerry Jones and-George Becker I, Burley moved and Work seconded a motion to approve the minutes of October 2, 1986 with the following corrections: (1) Add Paul Williams name to those present at the b meeting. fi (2) Change agenda item number 4 to read as follows: a. Becker mooed and Burley seconded a motion to amend Section 1009 (d), (g), (j). (h)(k)and (1) of the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code by changing references to Table 10-2 to Section 1010 as Section 1010 presently appears in the City of Denton's amer.dments to the 1979 Uniform Plumbing Code. Motion carried unanimously. It. Sullivan moved and Williams seconded a motion to amend " Section 1107 of the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code to read the same as Section 1107 of the 1979 Uniform Plumbing Code with the addition of the following sentence at the + end of the first paragraph of Section 1107 (a): One additional cleanout snail be installed at the property line and connected to the building sewer in such a manner that it opens in the direction of the flow of soil or V,c waste. Motion carried unanimously. r' 111. Burleyy moved and Work seconded a motion to amend Section 401 [a) and (b) of the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code by i deleting the words "extra strength vitrified clay piper' t" in (a) and by deleting the words "vitrified clay" in 1 (b). Motion carried unanimously. IV. Sullivan moved and Williams seconded a motion to amend Section 1108 of the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code to read as t1 follows: Building sewers or drainage pi ing materials G;',"Gµ which are not approved for use within a building shall not be run or laid in the same trench as the water pipes unless all of the followingg requirements are met: (it) Ditches are dug at least ei hteen (18) inches wide. Water and sewer lines shall be at least twelve (12) inches apart measured horizontally between outside i \ surfaces. (3) 'Ihe bottom of water lines at all points shall be at least twelve (12) inches above the top of the sewer line and the water line shall be placed on a solid shelf excavated at one side of the common ditch (4) Each F~¢ line shall rest on undisturbed or compact earth. •i t1 L r -)age 2 of 2 pages NUTE: For is pC r-se of this section, "within the buil,.,.ig" shall mean within the fixed limits of ' the building foundation. Motion carried unanimously. V. Sullivan moved and Williams seconded a motion to approve Chapter 11 as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. ii322I t l+ 45 ! H j R~ 1 r ' ,kr ;fir .1l0i fN 1~Z y l ~ ~y i I ttp I ,'~l ar`II T r 4A 4 41 A j/ y9~'Ii:If 1 3 ,xer ~ 3 0 n R .1 M1. p 1'14) R! _ Ipf~F v: Y 1 Y . r4i fV4 1 ``~~y r,•Y •4~ a ail 1' F e ~`11 C ~ 1 M! S ' y _ I 1 MINUTES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board October 23, 1986 PRESENT: Pete Work, Bob Sullivan, George Becker, Paul Williams and Jackie Doyle, Building Official 4 ABSENT: Jerry Jones and Bill Burley I, Sullivan moved and Becker seconded a motion to approve the minutes of October 9, 1986 with the following correction to the heading of agenda item I., (2): Change item number 4 of the October 2, 1986 minutes to read as follows: Motion carried unanimously. II. (a) Becker moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to amend Sec. 1201 of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code to read as presently amended in the Code of ordinances. Notion carried unanimously. (b) Sullivan moved and Becker seconded a motion to amend Sec. 1203 of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code by adding a paragraph (c) to read the same as presently shown in the Code of Ordinances. Motion carried unanimously. (c) Sullivan moved and Becker seconded a motion to amend Sec. 1210 of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code to read as presently amended in the Code of ordinances. (d) Work moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to amend Sec. 1212 (a) of the 1985 edition of the Uniform y ;?F Plumbing Code to read as presently amended in the { Code of Ordinances, Motion carried unanimously. (e) Becker moved and Work seconded a motion to amend Sec. j 1213 (f) of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Plumbing ' Code by adding a new sentence at the end to read as follows: Material used for backfill around the pipe, t shall be free of rocks, building materials, ashes and trash. Motion carried unanimously. (f) Sullivan moved and Becker seconded a motion to approve chapter 12 with proposed amendments. Motion carried unanimously, III. (a) Sullivan will review chapter 13 for the Board's next meeting. (b) She hazards of improperly vented clothes dryers and 1 4 the location of water heaters in garages was discussed briefly and will be discussed in more detail at the board's next meeting, Meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.R. U322I y. MINUTES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board October 30, 1986 PRESENT: Pete Work, Bill Burley, Paul Williams, George Becker and Jackie Duyle, Building Official i ABSENT: Jerry Jones and Robert Sullivan Burley moved and Williams seconded a motion to approve the f 1. minutes of October 23, 1986 as written. Motion carried unanimously. il. (a) Amend Sec. 1307 (c) (1) by changing the second paragraph to read as follows: Ducts conveying air from an attic space shall extend at least two (2) inches above insulation or other obstructions. The attic space shall be ventilated by fresh air openings or louvers on a vertical wall or at two (2) different levels or elevations. (b) Amend the last sentence of Sec. 1308 to read as follows: Protected combustible construction will be considered as such if it is of not less than one (1) hour fire resistive construction covered with a No. 26 gauge metal covering. N F` (c) Amend the last paragraph of Sec. 1309 to read as follows: Fuel burning water heaters shall not be located under stairways or landings. (d) Amend Sec. 1310 (a) to read as follows: Water ' heaters which generate a glow or spark or flame ' capable of igniting flammable vapors may be located in residential garages provided their pilots and 3 r burners or heating elements and switches are located at least eighteen (18) inches above the floor level and further provided that such water heaters are located in an approved compartment having a tight ,'^1 fitting door assembly adequately sealed to retard the entrance of flammable vapors. All combustion air for such installations shall be supplied from outside the tbuilding or from a properly ventilated attic space. "Y Water heaters located in commercial garages shall be installed at least eight (8) feet above the floor. (e) Amend the first two sentences of Sec. 1311 (b) to read as follows: Water heaters located on or in every attic, roof, mezzanine or platform more than 51 Ali, .s eight (8) feet above the ground or floor level shall 10 be made accessible by a stoirway, ladder, passageway, r trap door or catwalk. Ladders and stairways shall be ' permanently fastened to the building. t k MINUTES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board January 27, 1987 1 r PRESENT: Pete Work, Bill Burley, Paul Williams, George Becker, Ray Bunting, Plumbing Inspector and Jackie Doyle, Building Official ABSENT: Bob Sullivan and Jerry Jones 1. Burley moved and Becker seconded a motion to approve the minutes of October 30, 1980 as written. Motion carried unanimously. II. Mr, Keith Henigan of Pyramid Mechanical Services, I Incorporated and a representative of the Johns Manville Company were present requesting a variance from the plumbing code concerning their desire to use 4 inch, AWWA C-900 P.V.C. pipe for domestic water service at a psychiatric hospital under construction at 2026 West University Drive. Mr. Henigan stated that lie had obtained a copy of the City's amendments to the 1979 Uniform Plumbing Code and could find nothing which prohibits the use of C-900 pipe. Mr. Henigan pointed out that the Utility Department accepts the use of C-900. Jackie Doyle stated that Mr. Henigan had been given an out-of-date set of amendments and that the only plastic } pipe currently permitted by the code is schedule 40 P.Y.C. ' P P Mr. Henigan introduced the representative from Johns Manville who spoke to the Board about schedule 40 P.Y.C. and AWWA C-900. He said that the C-900 was a higher class pipe than schedule 40 P.V.C. manufactured to AST?! 178S or 1241 specifications. He pointed out that the wall thickness of C-900 is .283 inches compared to .237 inches } for schedule 40 P.Y.C. Mr. Henigan said that Class 150 1 C-900 is U.L. listed, approved by N.S.F. and is rated at 7SS psi compared to only 200 psi for schedule 40 P.V.C. The Johns Manville representative said that the most i widely used method of testing installed C-900 piping was to cover it with earth and fill with air. E 3 Burley moved and Williams seconded a motion to grant the variance. Motion carried unanimously. III. Williams moved and Becker seconded a motion to amend Sec. 1004 (a) of the plumbing code to allow AWWA C-900 water piping and approved fittings for use in domestic service lines outside of buildings. Motion carried unanimously. After reviewing proposed amendments to the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code, Becker moved and Work seconded a motion to approve proposed amendments as written. Motion carried unanimously. 0331I +ge 2 of 2 pages (f) Burley moved and Becker seconded a motion that chapter 13 of the 1985 edition of the Uniform 1 Plumbing Code and proposed amendments be approved, Motion carried unanimously, . I K. (g) Burley moved and Williams seconded a motion that the appendices to the 1985 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code be recommended to City Council for adoption. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. % 03221 ,t k 1N I ~I d. y 'a a r ' e t + y ,4 5 r tjl a,., w J' , i 1. `d 4,rr•f y My r bjJ 7A ✓ h ^tlS . 7 , ll ~ M 't R {y i 1 1 f be I ~t aa~:,i~ tYp :+rh 14 Iii A'~y1 t~~l ai V~ r YF I MINUTES Plumbing and Mr!-zhanical Code Board May 28, 1987 i I PRESENT: Pete work, Robert Sullivan, George Becker, and Bill Burley, I I ABSENT: Paul Williams and Jerry Jones STAFF: Jackie Doyle, Building Official Ray Bunting, Plumbing Inspector Dick Guditis, Mechanical Inspector 1. Burley moved and Becker seconded a motion to approve the minutes of January 27, 1987 as written. Motion carried } unanimously. II. Mr. George Nuckles representing Texas Instruments in their request for a variance from Section 406 (a) 4 of the plumbing code at 3944 North Elm Street stated that their plans call for cleanouts to be spaced at 50 feet on center r kn 4 inch and smaller building drain and sewer lines and at 95 feet on center in larger lines. Mr. Nuckles stated that Texas instruments does not object to the use of a "snake" inside their facility. s' Mr. Nuckles was asked by George Becker if the floor drains had integral cleanouts. Mr. Nuckles said they did. Sullivan asked Mr. Nuckles if there would be a two way ~Y fti cleanout serving the cafeteria drain. Mr. Nuckles said no they desired to treat the cafeteria the same as the rest of the facility. ,After reviewing specifications, Mr. Nuckles corrected himself and said the floor drains did not have integral cleanouts. Burley said that they did not have to have integral cleanouts if a cleanout was provided at the upper terminal of each drain line. Mr. Nuckles stated that there would be cleanouts at the upper terminal of each drain. Burley said that if this was the case then 2-way cleanouts would not be required by the code. rs. ' It was pointed out by the Board that Section 1107 does w~ require a single cleanout either immediately Inside the building or outside the building where the building drain r.` connects to the building sewer. Mr. Nuckles stated that a If that is what the code requires that is what they will N pt .W ige 2 of 3 pages 111. Mr. Charles Cole, Jr., Director Denton County Courts Services was present representing the County concerning their request for a variance from Section 708 (a) of the plumbing cots at the Juvenile Detention/Juvenile and Adult Probation Facility under construction at 210 Woodrow Lane. Mr, Ray Bunting, plumbing inspector is of the opinion that t a grease trap should a installed to serve the food 9 preparation area in the facility. Mr. Bunting when asked by a board member what size trap was required, he indicated at least a 40 " recommend a 4p Pound trap but he would not opinion a mipound Zp0 • Mr. Bunting stated that in his installed outside the b0 ildin. pound grease traddpp should be talked to the general contrac or bout thealte that he had ocation of the trap while Mr. Bunting was on vacation. The contractor had asked if the trap could be located under the floor adjacent to the kitchen and Doyle said that he did not see a problem in the proposed location. Mr, Cole when asked, indicated there was about 5 foot clearance under the building at that location. Mr. Cole stated that the grade beam had been cored for the future installation of piping to serve a grease trap if needed in the future and such r trap would be located outside the building. Mr. Cole was asked how many children could be kept at the facility at one time and he indicated 24. that the Sheriff's Department would provide mealsCate said per meal and that the only cooking that would be done at the facility would be to ~]•UU Prepare an institutional type meal in a microwave oven for a child who was brought in i` late, bit. Cole said that he could not prepare food in the facility as chea ] Count P Y as they could obtain it from the " Y jail and that as long as he was there they would not prepare meals at the facility. He said that if they did start preparing meals there they would let the board know and that a time. grease trap would be installed at that ,r r Mr. Cole was asked how many meals per day would be served if they prepared food at the facility. Mr. Cole said 72 meals per day, It was pointed out that the equipment in the food preparation area was of the residential t o w', Mr. Cole said the food would be delivered from the County fall in disposable containers and that there would not be pots, pans or utensils to wash, The Board was concerned that em 1 a oe p s and e eating would at the facility and that if they bdidcostart preparing meals for the children the board would not be informed of the change in operation, Mr. Bunting h; expressed his concern about the problems grease e wnen dumped into the sewer system. can cause t' 4, P r- , yr, . 1 3e 3 of 3 pages Sullivan moved and Becker seconded a motion that the County comply with code requirements. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Mr. Robin Howell was present representing Advantage Air Conditioning and Heating concerning their request for a variance from Section 1202 of the Mechanical code at a ; dwelling located at 1506 Stratford Lane. Mr. Howell stated that he had installed a up-flow air conditioning unit which was located above an under floor storage area and that the unit had no provisions for a secondary condensate drain. Mr. Howell indicated that he was not aware of the secondary drain requirement when he installed the unit. He said the unit was not located over a habitable area and would be okay. Burley stated that if a stoppage did occur that the wood structural members would get wet and that over a period of time could rot. Burley made reference to an apartment project where he was required to install pans and drains under units which were not designed for a secondary drain. Burley mentioned a type of float switch manufactured by Friendrich which could be installed in the unit and will cut off power to t the unit when the primary drain beco,aes stopped up. Howell expressed a concern about power being cut off y r the float switch when the drain was not stopped up. Board members assured him that if the switch was properly 1F installed nuisance tripping should not be a problem. Burley moved and Becker seconded a motion to allow the use j of a safety switch in place of a drip pan. Motion carried unanimously. 4 } , P V. Doyle passed out copies of the proposed plumbing ordinance and asked members to review It to assure that it is + correct before taking it to City Council, The board agreed to meet next Thursday to make final comments regarding the proposed ordinance. ' 03391 + F.P Y' Y f f• .l PIS P^ ~L f9•u 1F F ~ L( } .F1 S . i,. ri 141NUIES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board June 4, 1987 Q~ i PRESENT: Pete Work, Bill Burley, Robert Sullivan, and George Becker ABSENT: Paul Williams and Jerry Jones " STAFF: Jackie Doyle, Building Official and Ray Bunting, Plumbing Inspector 1. Sullivan moved and Work seconded a motion to approve the minutes of May 18, 1987 as written. Motion carried unanimously, 11. 1. Burley moved and Becker seconded a motion to amend Section 1004 (a) of the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code to ` read as follows: Water pipe and fittings shall be of brass, copper, cast iron alvanized wrought , galvanized malleable iron, Schedule 4U PVC and iron, galvanized a C9U0 z piping nlhavinglead the National Sanitation Foundation seal followed by the J letters PW may be used for cold water distribution systems outside of buildings. All water pipe and fittings shall be. manufactured to recognized sLandards. All materials used in the water supply system, except valves and similar devices, shall be of like material, except where otherwise approved by the administrative authority. Notion carried unanimously. r: . 2. Burley moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to add a er 'r new sentence at th, end of Section 802 (1) to read as ` follows: A cleaner primer must be used and shall have a readily i,'ontiftable color. The cleaner primer shall not be clear in color. Motion carried unanimously, ; 3. In Item number i plumbing ordinance 3 change the the draft of "lthe roposed ocated" to "location". Burley moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to amend part 201,1.3 of IAPMO IS 12-83 by deleting the last sentence. Motion carried unanimously. 's y. ae 2 of 2 pages Burley moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to amend part 1213.2 of IAPMO IS 12-83 by adding a sentence at the end to read as follows: Cement or mechanical compression fittings are prohibited. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. 2 ~•s 03411 ~T l 4b ( a 1 ~ e y a7: '71 I A 11 ^I r`~t ~ , l t' v * . ~ I % A'yf agf714K ke' r I ' ar r i l r I <y 1 Q, r t/tit. I ( i w ~t Y 6^? y 1 l , h ~Kl r"1 'FV7~, 1 r +++"`111 '.r :I l n ~'i Y a,. ~ ~ fi f'h y ~ y a e~. I~ ?.iNU1ES Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board June 11, 1987 ;I r i PRESENT: Pete Work, Bob Sullivan, Bill Burley, Paul Williams, and Jackie Doyle, Building Official ABSENT: George Becker 1. Sullivan moved and Williams seconded a motion to approve the minutes of Jun3 4, 1987 as written. Motion carried unanimously. S. II, Sections of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Mechanical Code were assigned to board members for review as follows: Doyle - Chapters 1-4, Burley - Chapters S-7 and 209 Williams - Chapters 8 and 90 Becker - Chapters 10 and 11, Work - Cha Chapters 12-17, and Sullivan - 18 and 11, III, (1) Burley moved and Work seconded a motion to delete ,t item II past 4 from the minutes of June 4, 1987, i. Motion carried unar;imously. f (t) Burley moved and Sullivan seconded a motion to amend Section 1212 (c) of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code by adding the following sentence at the end of Section 1212 (c): Solvent cement or mechanical compression fittings are prohibited, l~Y, (3) Paul Williams told the Board that he would be retiring soon and therefore would be resigning from the Board at the end of the year or sooner if the City Council appoints new members. 4 03411 k d T y IM A` 11 Y ray l ~I , DATE: 07/21/87 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF SIX FEET OF A 16' UTILITY EASEMENT ON L01 6 OF THE J.Y.S. ADDITION, PHASE ONE 1 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the abandonment by a vote of 4 to 1. The Commission stated that similar requests may be recommended for denial in the future where it appears that a builder deliberately disregards the City regulations. SUMMARY: + This 16 toot utility easement was e9tabllehed with the plot of the J.V.S. Addition, Phaae One. A portion of a residence was built into the easement. The title company now requires a release of this portion of the easement to complete the property transfer. Although A 16 foot easement i1 a standard :equi ement for ease of maintenance and service, there is no line located within thi►, six foot area. x BACKGROUND: r The Development Review Committee recommended denial of this request before the structure was built. Following that action a building was constructed that was six feet into the easement. In this specific case no utilities are located in the six test and it appears that the existing lines in the remaining ten feet can be maintained. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTM Utility Department, Departments involved with the development process and the landowner. FISCAL IMPACTS The Engineering Department has appraised this property to have no value to the City. Respec 611y submitted: r =/z zz r Prepared bys Cit Manager ~ ~ C`~el•~i Cam--~ ` Cecilo Carson Urban Planner JI' h^ Appro dI Jeff Meye ~r Executive Director for Planning t and Development r r 1838L I i I NO. AN ORDINANCE ABANDONING AND VACATING A CERMN UTILITY EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. " i i` WHEREAS, the City Council of thn City of Denton, Texas has determined that the hereinafter described utility easement, whether one or more, is no lonmer needed for public use; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Texae Revised Civil Statutes, Article 5421c-12, an appraisal of the fair market value of said easement has been obtained; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State law, said easement is being abandoned and vacated in consideration of the receipt of the fair market value thereof; NOW9 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the hereinafter described easement is aban one an vacated as an easement for public utilities; the easement being more particularly described below; All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and beinD part of the J. MI Gowan survey, Abst. No. 797, and being part of lot No. 40 block A, of the JVS Addition, ar, addition to a the City/County of Denton, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Teasley Road Joint Venture to Reuel Yarbrough by deed dated 10-2S-85 and recorded in Voll:me 1751, Page 777 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING for the southwest corner of the tract being described herein at a point in the west lino of the said lot, said point Y1 being 10.12 feet from the southwest corner of said lot; THENCE north 100 00' 00" west with the west line of the said lot a distance of 6.07 feet to a point at the northwest corner of the sold 16 foot utility easement; THENCE north 880 48' 32" east with the north line of the said easement crossing said lot a distance of 143.16 feet to a point in the east line of said lot at the northeast corner of 'the said 1 easement; THENCE south 10 23' 42" east a distance of 6.0 feet to a point for the southeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE south 860 48' 32" west with a line 6 feet south of and parallel with the north line of the said easement recrossing t' said lot a distance of 147.25 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and enclosing 856.23 square feet of land. ;i r 1 ~ SECTION II. That said easement, whether one or more, is herein a an oiled and vacated, and by operation of law, the City of Denton's property interest in said easement shall revert to the abutting property owner, whether one or more, ano the City of Denton hereby releases any and all claims to the use of the property described in said easement referenced herein for the j purposes therein described. SECTION M. That this ordinance shall become effective imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987, RAY STEPHENS, ~ r r . 'i t ATTEST: r ' t JENNIFER W LTERS, CI" SECRE'ML APPROVED AS TO LEGAL EORN: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVIICN, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ,~r •~w'~ i, . t t to v r ~ ~ r. 4 t i PAGE TWO • ' . MV }.I ..fir..... As.' `I I .~..i ..w ywr •t p•Fwt~ MsN•~1 M N1 f~.i LAN9i V tl~~ *y of &$wV* r ' SMdl,ro.1~►' of PI~I tAl On=: ' /lne• _ _ __...YM~ttlosl~lMCilyof D~I~Qs.~--~~ T" nooedM ~N Pao "j ' Tuft sowilrl W IM ~ AM Is aY pwo....1.~-• o(ua ,...4 VA - lv T i t Is" of 3 W ~ ' 02 l, 060 ~O~ Olt. ~ 3.., 'rr' ~ 1 ~ 'ji~ „ j t 1 ~ hti Ci Hof 5 ' ` 25 ' o,~~~~u ~ arid. "stir ' rrz S At 's/ot is ow w/IA,'o? ; lede 119,V,114.n of JA4,40 ey p/ielas 480/910o1s8 dsledd/j~9 'r u rb o1 S/fMO If a Iaim moaA •~.1....... ...........a.. ..,b ' E Minutes Planning and toning Commission June 24, 1987 A ' The regular meeting of the PlanninS and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texu w eel l on Wednesday, June u , 1987, at } 5:00 p.m., in the Couneil Chamber of the Municipal building. Present: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. S. Esc , Jr., P Ivan Glasscock and Judd Holt Absent: Eullne Brock and Willias sammin y Present from Staff: Elizabeth Evens, Planning Adoinistrator{ $ Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant Clt Attorney{ Jerry Clark, Cit, Englneerl and Susan Mitchell, Secretary Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order. 1. MINUTES: It was moved by Mr. Escue, seconded by Mr. Glasscock aa~ntmousiy carried (5.0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of June 10, 1987. 11 . ABANDONMENT OF 6 FEET OF A 15 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ON LOT 4 r " J.V.5. ADDITION. PHASE 1. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that this 16 foot utll}ty easem -was established with the plat of the J.Y.S. Addition, Phase One, She said that approximately a year ago a request to abandon the easement was denied by the Development Review Committee, there was no structure on the property at that time. She sold that now a portion of a residence is built into the easement and the title company requires a r.-lease of this portion of the easement to complete the property transfer. " She said that althouQb a 16 foot easement is a standard re- quirement for ease of maintenance and service, thete are no utility lines located within this 6 foot orea. She added that the Development Review Committee recommends approval of the V abandonment of the 5 foot portion of the le foot utility ' easement on Lot 1 of the J.Y.S. Addition, Phase One. Mr. Holt asked how this happened. Ms. Carson stated that th• owner requested a building permit and the permit was granted. She said that the building inipectors may not have known the exact location of the easement. Mr. Holt stated that he was awate that the city Inspects the sitss to Insure that building is not occurring in the easements. He said that in the future { the Commission may not a prove abandonments that appear to be deliberate attempts to disregard the plat and city. DECISION: 4r. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the a e-nTonmen: of 6 feet of a 16 foot utility easement on Lot 4, J.Y.S, Addition, Phase 1. Seconded by Ms. Cole and motion ? carried (4.1). Mr. Escue voted no, 111. A-46. 'rroposed annexation of 212.12 acres bring port of the " - T toy Survey, Abstract No, 2121 J. Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 21 B. Burleson Survey, Abstract No. 6S1 N. Coker Survey Abstract No. 2491 and the R, Johnson Survey, Abstract No, 696. STAFF REPORTS Me, Carson stated that in January of 1986, the UTTy ouneoune T completed on annexation of a 700 scot strip along 1.35. A number of property owners requested that the strip be 41 reduced to 500 feet, and the City Council repealed the annexa- tion ordinance at its May S, 1987 meeting. the intent of this annexation is the some as for the previous annexation which is to permit the City of Denton to extend its city limits to the east and west of f-SSN as needed when additional development occurs along this corridor. She added that staff recommends approval. ilk 1476L i i NO. AN ORDIJ'ANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT I BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENT04 AND 9ELOITTE HASKINS, AND SELLS AS h AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING S~PTEMBER 309 1987. AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City loit~em City of asntthe Texasdesires to appoint De auditors for the City of Denton, Texas for the fiscal year ending 1~^ September 30, 1987. SECTION II. That Deloitte, Haskins and Sells Is hereby ~~rdesignate as t e auditing firm for the City of Denton, Texas for + the fiscal year ending September 30, 1987 in accordance with the terms and provisions of the commitment letter of Deloitte, Haskins and Sells dated July 7, 1987, and the conditions set forth in the Proposal to Provide Professional Services, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION II1_ That this ordinance shall become effective fl r imme lately upon its passage and approval. p PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1987. rw .1 C a+11 1{~ 1 i4r,~ 1 ire r + rpr~ t RAY STEPHENS,-TUMr a t t: i 1 I ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY ' y iXtl BY. i A , / .a.y y:A: d. ..n q.:41 .r. n Y shy a` Delcitte Haskins--Sells F me F~rsl TonPT 601 Cherry Street. Su4e 2340 Fort Wcrth, Teas 761026601 18171 336-2531 Metro 6542777 Tele■ 778612 pp The Honorable Ray Stephens July 7, 1987 alyd Members of the City Council City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mayor Stephens and Council Members: This letter will confirm our understanding of the arrangements covering our examination of the financial statements of C±.ty of Denton ("City") for the year ending y September 3D, 14187, We will examine the City's combined financial statements for the year ending September 30, 1987, Our examination will r1 be made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the provisions of Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Pro rams# Act v t es an Functions, promo gate by the U, S. Corptrooiler General, as they pertain to financial audits. Accordingly, the i examination will include such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we consider necessary In the circumstances. The objectives of our examination are to express an opinion on the financial a statements of the City, as well as render a report on " compliance of the City with the terms and requirements of certain Federal laws. Y j Our procedures will include, among others, tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, tests of tax receipts and related assessment ` rolls, and direct confirmation of receivables, grant receipts and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected taxpayers, creditors, legal counsel and banks. At the conclusion of our examintion, we will request certain written representations fr:m you about the financial statements and matters related t-:ceeto, in addition, we will review the City's implementation of our recommendations presented in our Report to Managerent for the year ended September 30, 1987, This review will occur 4• in mid-fiscal year and be determined by the City's Audit Committee, We will present our findings to the Audit Committee, l fA11 a~. .46 r i The Honorable Ray Stephens and Memte.s of the City Council July , 1987 2 Before commencing our examination w9 would be pleased to i meet with you to review and discuss the scope of our audit procedures in more detail. The fair presentation of financial position and results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting « principles is management's responsibility. Management is responsible for the development, implementation and maintenance of an adequate system of internal accounting control and for the accuracy of the financial statements. Although we may advise you about appropriate accounting principles and their applications, the selection and method of application are responsibiliti " Solely of management. Our engagement is subject to the inherent risk that material errors, irregularities or illegal acts, including fraud or defalcations, if they exist, will not be detected. However, wa will inform you of any such matters that come to our attention. Fees for our services are based on per diem rates, ;lus 4111 out-of-pocket expenses, all of which will be billed as our ; F 1 work progresses. Our maximum fee for this engagement is :pt $41,700. Should an increase in the scope of our services be required, we would provide you with a change in our fee S prior to commencing the work. During the course of our engagement, we may observe r` opportunities for economy in or improved controls over your r` operations, we will bring such matters to the attention of ;i the appropriate level of management in writing. ` If you intend to publish or otherwise reproduce the j financial statements and make reference to our firm, you Sa agree to provide us with printers' proofs or masters for our review and approval before printing. You also agree to provide us with a copy of the final reproduced material for our approval before it is distributed, Please indicm.te your agreement to these arrangements by signing the attached copy of this letter and returning it to ,','¢0 , 1 ^J 4 ~ I ~ 1 F L l 1 ~ f, A 1 Y .cwt, i M`' y r'. j. r . - N t € The Honorable Ray Stephens and Members of the City Council Jaly 7, 1987 3 we appreciate your confidence in your appointment of us as your certified public accountants and look forward to working with you and your staff. ,y Your very truly, rr. Approved By _ Date II'~ 5 t ~!r r ~f1 t~~ft 'j E~q r y .ly,. tt r~11 r, , i Ir t it ; I r ♦ , N. y n~ i~ f e j . YI f v 4r ~ u r ; 6V 4' ~~iy1A 4 ~ 15l ~ x.{ L 1 r11YJ1 ~ 1~ r~YV: e. .tl v 1 ,r. ~I ,y r.rr If itJ aY (~Y i c c- yr'n Iy ~ ~Y~..', 4 « i j f ~f 'yki V ~ S .r? ~ u IfP e° ~i r n r f ~ ~y.Yy~. rr.♦«• r>y~n rTApY «n'~ .w.. "'ll•~~ fey. ro& % 1741L i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISION COMPENSATION PLAN AND AUTHORIZING 'THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT SAID PLAN; AND i DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3 x WHEREAS, the City Manager and his staff have presented proposed revisions to the Management/Super+'Lsion Compensation Plan and recommended the adoption of administrative procedures for said pl,ir to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such revisions and aithorize the City Manager to Implement them; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: fiCTION I, That the. attached classification and compensation plan- ~ ore management/supervision job categories in the City of Denton, attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted and the City Manager is authorized to implement said plan and adoppt ' administrative procedures in accordance with the recommendations in the attached memorandum, which is incorporated herein by reference. t SECTION Ii. The foregoing plan shall he filed in the official records o the City of Denton with the Director of Personnel/ Employee Relations and the City Secretary. SECTION 111. Any Management/Supervision Compensation Plan ti adopted y prior resolutions of the City %ouncil Is hereby rescinded to the extent of any conflict with the foregoing plan and with any administrative procedures issued under the authority of the City Council implementing the plan hereby adopted. SECTION IV. This resolution :hall become effective immediately y' upon is passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1987. f KAY STEPHENS, MAYOR ATTEST: NNI ER LTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY! • f. 'f i I CITY of DENTON, TEXAS NUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 78201 /TELEPHONE (817)608-830? Office of the Clfy Nensper MEMORANDUM ri, t TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager a,+ FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager r.. DATE: July 15, 1987 SUBJECT: AIR SHOW - LABOR DAY ` Attached is a memorandum from Ron Bowling discussing the possibility of an air show on Labor Day, We think the air show ,p;,i, will be of benefit to us. It will give us a chance to advertise the airport and make people aware of it. f, As k As you can see, we would not be " nanciall! involved and we z•; will be able to realize 20% of the gate after the first $50000 of expenses has been covered. The City would not be out any money. We will be using some of our staff, most notably Ron k and his airport personnel, to help put the show together. One hangup still seems to be the insurance. We would suggest to the Council that they approve letting the International Aerohttic Club, Dallas Chapter, use our airport for the show on September 7 with the stipulation that the appropriate coverage r fs for the show, approximately three million dollars, plus any other agreements or contracts, be signed before the show is t" « allowed. Ron thinka that the Club may have some difficulty 1T with the insurance and its limits. However, we would still like to pursue the scheduling of this event so that the Club would have time to be able to organize the show if they can meet all our insurance requirements. ' err ! If you or the Coureil aave further questions, we will be happy to try and answer them. + 11f„7« dye' } ` R ck Svehla L, Deputy City Manger 3543H z + r' , , ..~,.1MMrM r r.....w«n~w.w..l.:i M...Yal, irJ'GY^. u/.r..., - . w... n. r.. y. ti ~M.AA.f~ 'T7 Y K. { i {r s I { sew, 1f d CITY of DENTON 1215 E. McKfn.-9y / Dvnfon, Texas 76201 ^ ~ N"riORANGUM 'j i DATE: July 15, 1987} S} T0: Rick Svehle, Deputy City Manager FFOM: Ron Bowling, Airport Manager e; SUBJECTS REGUaST FOR THE INTERNATIOi.1M, A4ROBATIC CLUB TO USE AIRPORT , The International Aerobatic Club, Dallas Chapter, to proposl:,g tel stage an Ali Show at Denton Municipal Airport on September 7, 1W (Labor Day). Iaeluded along with the Air Show will be s momorial service for Vietnam Veterrns, The 4 memorial service will consist of a 1~ tef service and a fly-by of military aircraft, seething similar to the mis ing man formation. After the memorial service, aircraft from each branch of the service will fly-by honoring veterans 'f the military services. Hopefully, s large band will be Crrom each branch or f present to play the Appropriate music for this event, a= t The actual Air Show will conslet of twenty aircraft performing aerobatics, ; werbirde doing fly-bye and parachute sumps. All pilots performing aerobatics will have one million dollars liability Insurance. Addltiorially, the F Aerobatio Club will provide a one million dollar insurance policy for the C!ty g of Denton, Currently, the staff thinks that wo should have more insurance k coverage= however, we raicommend that we proceed to try to work with the Aerobstio Club provided they can meet the cover.oge recormended by staff. 0`. The actual Air Show operation will be conducted with the approval and ' . supervis=or, of the P.A.A. utilising F.A,A. Flight Standards. Security, i'. medicet, p+rkinR eootrol and other required services will be provided by volunteer personnel. Expenses for the Air Show wil' be prov.ded by the 0rotatio Club and private fff donations, The City of Denton will not be obligated for any costs whatsoever. Costs to the public will be $5.00 for persons 12 years or older, and $3,00 for t{ children under 12 years old. The City of Denton will receive 20% of the gmss ticket sales for use of the airport, r t ~ r 1"1F h S. 3 tk 't Rick Svehla July 1S, 19b7 Page 2 This Air Show will bring persons to Denton from all over the Metroplex and money will be spent in Denton. Additionally, offering an Air Show to the t public provides an excellent opportunity to show off airport taollities. 4 ; 4v Ron Bowling 3 Airport ftnager a kn n 1_ 0689k F~ " f , 1 ! a ~ ~ yyy Lf.. I ~ \ a y" P~ ~ ~ 5w !y,~n1,t 1h^ J""1 !n ' 1 i +ryr rl Jta 6 Y,>ti l i" h~ ' t~ r- a r <I 'i a, ~ r a v 6''.' a I 1 I ~t J~ ~yfA' 4ti x9 r !,s F t 1 a, r y P t a r, E N 9 F 7 OF FILE i ~a T