Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-04-1987 i i Ekk C F AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL August 4, 1987 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, Auust 4, Munici l 1987, at SatS whichinthee foillowingDefense Itemsoo will the consideared: Note: alsoitbe considered tha:A part ofr tthe Work he Agenda Session the y Regular Meeting. w 1, Executive Session; Art. 6252-17 r. A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e). Y . A . T . S . B. Real fitate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 Y.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appoint:eents Under, Sec. 2(g), % z Art 6252-17 V.A,T.SS. 2, Presentation of the County Health Department Task Force Report. Hold a discussion of a pro osed 1000 foot strip annexation east of 1.35, north of Rector Road along - Clear Creek. (A-49) r4 js .L•. Cogeneration Study 4, Receive a rEEpiZ~ Daily and Brain, performed by r S. Hold a discussion regarding the CIP Program. Receive an overview of the drainage requirements. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, August a, 1987, at at00 which in the Council following Citemsrswill the Municipal Building considered: ss ' 7:00 p.m. Consider approval of the minutes of the special call 1~ meeting of June 23, 1987 and the special call meeting of June 30, 1987. it City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1987 F; Page 2 ' a 2. Consider a request from the Firefighters Association to solicit funds from various City street corners. 3. Consider a request from the American Cancer Society to solicit funds at the intersection of University Drive and Carroll Blvd, from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Saturday, August 15, 1987, 4, Consider a request from the Kappa Sigma Alumni Association and Fraternity, 2026 W. Oak, to extend curfew for live outdoor music from 10,ur00Po se ry of this 11.00 P.m. o the purpose on August 1S, 1987, The request is to hold an alumni reunion and fund raiser ,i for undergraduate scholarships. s , a S. Public Hearings A. Consider a petition of Carter and Burgess, Inc., representing Miller of Texas, requesting annexation of 73,334 acres of land being (pAart3)of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, B. Consider a petition of Carter and Burgess, Inc., representing Miller of Texas, requesting annexation of 2.822 acres of land being ppart of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417. (A-44) ~r•` ra D C. Consider a petition of Miller of Texas requesting annexation of 1.834 acres tract lNo. and being (A t of the G. Walker Survey, I 6. Consent Agenda 1 Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff t recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment tinder the Ordinance section of the km"` agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the b{, ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, 73). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. a A. Bids and Purchase Orders: ! 1. Bid 09774 -Tractor 8 Implements „ 2. Bid 09760 - Bolivar Street 8" Sanitary Sewer 3. Bid 09764 - Pecan Creek Drainage Channel r` 6 y F' :1 ..t•1 City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1987 Page 3 r 7, Ordinances award accepting A. cConsider ompetitive dbids o ando providing ordinance contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution fDenton change and Calvet to Paving t Coet between the City of D. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between the City of denton and R. L. Roberts Construction. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the number of persons authorized to be employed k in each classified position in the Police Department for the City of Denton, Texas and repealing all ordinances and resolutions in r conflict herewith. F. Consider adoption of an ordinance adopting an appliance rebate program (Public Utilities Board recommends approval). t G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and Lutz, Daily 4 Brain III for engineering services (Public Utilities Board recommends approval). U. Director ofopUtilities ntorexecute acontractsgwith electric utility customers to reduce electrical over demand and authorizing credits on utility bills for customers who execute such contracts (Public Utilities Board recommends app I. Consider adoption of ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning proposed annexation of a 24.3957 acre tract being a~ part of the J. Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 2, and part of the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract No. 659 and north of and being ion located of Rctor Road• (A-SO) intersect x City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1987 Page 4 i J. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a project engagement letter with Wood, Lucksinger & Epstein for professional legal services. 8. Resolutions A. Consider approval of resolution setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning proposed annexation of a 9.2154 acre tract being part of the J. Early Survey, Abstract No. 1279, r and the Moreau Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, w ' and being located at the northeast corner of Mingo Road and North Cooper Creek Road. (A-47) 9. Motion to accept and approve the CIP Program for 1987.88 to 1991.1992. 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. III Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters x B. Real Estate C. Personnel n D. Board Appointments 12. Now Business: { This item provides a section for Council Members to F suggest items for future agendas. 13. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Soc. 2(e), Art. 6252.17 V.A.T.S. ti{I, 1. Hold a discussion regarding litigation with Maverick vs. the City of Denton. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 61:52-17 I . , V.A.T.S. s x J I City of Denton City Council Agenda t August 41 1987 ► i Page S C. Personnel/Board Apppointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 62S2.17 V.A,T,S, 1. Hold a discussion regarding compensation of the Municipal Judge, C E R T I F I C A T E a I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin o d at the C y Hall of the City of D ton, Texas, on the day of , 1987 at 8 o'clock (a.m.) p. m. I x Ife try 1 ; e rt r -p;. r ~rc`f vL P, t''` 1.. p rill.. _ . 1 l~i . by d 271SC r ~ I t x I c + v a i r'4 1 µ I I; ~ 1 I♦ I~' 1 r ' LY F r q, ~J. w,` J ~r v t i AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL August 4, 1987 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, August 4, 1987, at S:1S p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the i, Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Meeting. S:15 P.M. 1. Executive Session: f A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 62S2-17 V,A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. f C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 1(g), Art 6252.17 V.A.T. . 2, Presentation of the County Health Department Task Force Report. 3. Hold a discussion of a proposed 1000 foot strip annexation east of 1.3S, north of Rector Road along iii Clear Creek. (A-49) 4. Receive a report on the NTSU Cogeneration Study performed by Lutz, Daily and Brain. S. Hold a discussion regarding the CIP Program. 6. Receive an overview of the drainage requirements. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, August 40 1987, at 7:00 p,it. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be s; considered:' 9s; 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the minutes of the special call ` meeting of June 23, 1987 and the special call meeting ' of June 30, 1987. ' ' e.+ .:±rtna1WF4E..t-KTW rrx.y I ~ j r F City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1987 Page 2 2. Consider a request from the Firefighters Association to solicit funds from various City street corners. 3. Consider a request from the American Cancer Society to solicit funds at the intersection of University Drive and Carroll Blvd, from 9:00 a.m. to 1;00 p.m. on Saturday, August 15, 1987, 4. Consider a request from the Kappa Sigma Alumni Association and Fraternity, 2026 w, Oak, to extend the curfew for live outdoor music from 10:00 P.M. until 11:00 p.m. on August 15, 1987. The purpose of this request is to hold an alumni reunion and fund raiser for undergraduate se~holarshlps. S. Public Hearings A. Consider a petition of Carter and Burgess, Inc., representing Miller of Texas, requesting annexation of 73.334 acres of land being part of the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417. (A-43) r B. Consider a petition of Carter and Burgess, Inc., jJf representing Miller of Texas, requesting annexation of 2.822 acres of land being part of W. the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417. A-44) C. Consider a petition of Miller of texas requesting annexation of 1.834 acres of land being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330. (A-4S) Consent Agenda b. k. Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the k agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, 7.8). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance. w ` A. Bids and Purchase Orders: a Bid 19774 - Tractor 6 Implements s , 2. Sid 19760 - Bolivar Street 8" Sanitary Sewer , 3. Bid 19764 - Pecan Creek Drainage Channel i City of Denton City Council Agenda t August 4, 1987 } Page 3 7. Ordinances A. cConsider ompetitive dbids o ando providing ordinance nthe award accepting contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between the City of Denton and Calvert Paving Co. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between , the City of denton and R. L. Roberts Construction. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the number of persons authorized to be employed in each classified position in the Police Department for the City of Denton, Texas and c repealing all ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith. F. Consider adoption of an ordinance adopting an appliance rebate program (Public Utilities Board recommends approval). G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement Brain en IIIe foC of Denton rt' engineering and services ' ` Daily 4 (Public Utilities Board recommends approval). H. Considerop an r authorizing the Di with Director of Utilities to execute contracts , ; electric utility customers to reduce electrical ower bills for demand authorizing who execute credits contracts (Public Utilities Board recommends approval), f * I, Consider adoption of ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning proposed annexation of a 24r39S7 acre tract being t part of the J. Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 20 and part of the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract, No. 6S and being located west of I-3S and north of intersection of Rector Road. (A-50) ti z f. # City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1987 Page 4 J. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a project engagement letter with Wood, Lucksinger & Epstein for professional legal services. 8. Resolutions r A. Consider approval of resolution setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning proposed annexation of a 9,2154 acre tract being part of the J. Early Survey, Abstract No. 12790 and the Moreau Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417 and being located at the northeast corner o e Mingo Road and North Cooper Creek Road. (A-47) r 9. Motion to accept and approve the CIP Program for 1487-88 to 1991-1992. 10. Receive a report from Mr. Carl Young regarding traffic c, problems in Denton and the annual Easter egg hunt. Vfir 11. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. ` 12, Official Action on Executive Session Items: V, A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 13. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 14, Executive Session: A. Leggal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252.17 t V.A.T.S. 1. (told a discusfion regarding litigation with ' Maverick vs. the City of Denton, B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252.17 V.A.T.S. <4. a. II , . f ; yr a r. a S City of Denton City Council Agenda August 4, 1987 i Page 5 I C. Personnel/Board Apppointments Under Sec. 2(g), ' Art 6252-17 V,A.T.S. 1. Hold a discussion regarding compensation of the Municipal Judge, i t. I C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1987 at o'clock I p.m. j CITY SECRETARY 1Y 2715C y~ t . G- i .f, 3 , ~ 14Y I F* 4 I 17' { 1 : 1 Y!'Y 9/7 n .I f tl r fyY If .'t fti i,± I u y Y f s t AGENDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL August 4, 1987 E 7:00 p.m. 1. Receive a report from Dr. Richard Simms and Dr. Jim Riggs regarding traffic safety at the intersection of Southridge Drive and Lillian Miller Parkway. 2. Consider adoption of an ordinance to provide for an effective date of September 15, 1987 for the 1985 t Uniform Plumbing Code. , C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the ' bulletin board at the City Nall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1987 at o'clock CITY SECRETARY 2717C 5 p y I ` r P DATC: Augusi 4, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOHP,AT " /S T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM.. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: County Health Department Task Force Report RECOMMENDATION: Discuss the County Health Department Task Force findings and consider its recommendations. r SUMNARTI The Task Force recommends that the City of Denton continue to contract 1 with the County Health Department unless we are dissatisfied with the fee assess- ments or level of services. Contingency plans have been outlined in the event that the City decides to provide in-house health services. BACKGROUND: Reorganization of the County Health Department in Hay 1985, raised f f A ~r several concerns, specifically the uncertainty of fee assessments for health k x services each year. The County Health Department Task Force was formed to provide s the Council with a thorough pictare of our optionsl coWnue to contract with the County or provide health services in-house. E P GAA_S. DEFARTRWTS OR GROUPS ATPICTIDI General fund p`'a FISCAL IMPACTs r; Approximately $79,242 Res tfull su teds ~s- ' L d Harrell Prepared Dys Ci V Manager aulet e-Owene-Holmes I ~z. Program Administrator All d t J° y:a i`x.flx. . 1 r r.. n_a...,... .m, v',`.t.Ma`.:.rN•a ar.Cm. @..ar..,aNnNbl ' is 5~I5 0 s J a - , CITY of DENTON / 213 E, McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201 I M E M O R A N D U M ' DATEi July 279 1987 I TOi Betty McKean Executive D+reetor for Municipal Services t and Economic Developmer FROMi Paulette Owens-Holmes Program Adm.nistrator { ` SUBJECTt COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT TASK FORCES FINAL REPORT ss` ft~ Nj j 1, JI''1 The County Health Department Task Force has completed its reseatch on the k F S'' i r. feasibility of an in-house environmental health unit. The report will be presented at the August 4 Council meeting for discussion. A summary of the report is provided below. ' `~~?i~4f~•°" ~ ~ The City of Denton has always contracted with the County Health Department s"`; ,r + to provide a full scope of clinical and environmental cervices for our citizens. We continue to contract with the County Health Department for these health services. Our fee asscssment for the current fiscal year is $66,742. This assessment represents a combined total for clinical and *~e « iry environment,il services. In previous years however, each service was ir'I+«"> computed individually by the Couvity, +i 4 Reorganization of the County Health Department in May 1986, raised a number of concerns. Specifically, than r. o insufficient level of communication from the County to the .'1 participating cities a 0 overall leve tf services x` r o uncertainty of fee assessments for health services each year I~ L++y i In addition, the City currently performs several environmental services. These in-house services include code enforcement, animal control, vector Ei control, and water polution monitoring and control. l ; r f n d , . FJ i . s Y i F l Mckean, page 2 i 3 After intense negotiations with the County regarding fee assessments last year, the question was raised by Council whether it would be more cost effective to continue our present arrangement with the County or provide health services in-house. In an attempt to provide the Council with a thorough picture of the options and the relative merits of each, the County Health Department Task Force was formed in August 1986 to research these issues, Y ; [ j The task force considered several optionsi 1. Continue to contract with the county for clinical and environmental services. ~$t 2. Form a pity-operated clinical and environmental services health i F unit. h ~ a 3. Form a City-operated environmental services health unit and contract with the Count for clinical services. ~q„ i~ d v t.4 ' 7tl , , As a result of our, research we reconunend the followings 1. Continue to contract with the County unless the City deems the level of services and/or fee assessments for health services as unacceptable for the 1987-88 fiscal year. 2. Implement our contingency plan in the event that the level of services and/or fee assessments are deemed unacceptable k a, house the City environmental health unit in the Department of "y. Public Works b, designate the County as our health authority for clinical l services, We currently have not received a definitive answer from the County a` ys; regarding fee assessments for clinical and environmental services for the 1987-88 f4~ea1 year, We anticipate however, that fee assessments will be 4, raised to meet a shortfall in state funding as well as an anticipated ;',1Y Y + decrease in restaurant fees, The realit/ then, of providing health services for our citizens in-house, may be a strong possibility. € k 4 a. F ' u t ~ t • F ~Y I M~i al• d~, Vd fix;, R"~ e k y r,S t la , f. i + 1 + i Y r as 4 McKean, page 3 t f Task force members and I will be present at the August 4 work session to apprise Council of our findings as well as the current status of the County Health Department. In the interim, if you have any at'estions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. f • Paulett ens-Holmes 1.". Program Administrator 4rr 1i ^4 ~r r e KI k; I,l Y. r A i~ v~ yr 3 , ~ t i ~ 'r~:R ~~d r ~ t ~•y _ rt Y r ~ y , '4'"'j yt ' ~ 4e `f 14' ° 'W: N/1rrfY i Ii ♦ e ..v\ YM fM.. nw N✓INiYM ' ♦i ' f a Y {flf ` I i t COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT t TASK FORCE REPORT 'r Y A~ :f. 1. r e r I,~ Y 1 yvY.rn l ,C4 b 1 ~1 1 y l a ~ 4 t~,7 tMt ~ ~ ~rz`4 l*n~l 0.14 1 I Lt f + f 41 t V fur ' ~ ~ ~n 4~ ~ I~ ,r 7x s, f., F, 1 i' oA a.~ 4' *W0 0* INTRODUCTION i The Local Public Health Reorganization Act allows for each municipality to provide its citizens with basic environmental and clinical health services (rafar to Article 44368 of the appendix). These services can be provided by the municipality or through arrangements with local county health departments. The City of Denton has always contracted with the County Health Department to provide a full scope of services for our citizens. We continue to contract with the County Health Department for clinical and environmental health services for the 1986-87 fiscal year. Our current fee assessment for these services is ;66,742. In previous years, each service was computed individually by the County, Our current assessment however, represents a comb fined iota and environmental services. 1 for clinical d Reorganization of the County Health Department in May 1986, has raised a number of concerns. Specifically, thei o insufficient level of communication from the County to the participating cities o overall level of services ' o uncertainty of fee assessments for health services each year In addition+ the City already Y y performs several environmental services. These f in-house services include code enforcement, animal control, vector control and water pollution monitoring and control, ~a The City then, finds itself in a position to determine whether it will be more cost effective to continue our present arrangement with the County or provide health services "in-house," In an attempt to provide the Council with a thorough picture of the options and the relative merits of each, the County Health Department Task Force has been formed to research these issues. Members includes ^N o Jeff Meyer Planning a Harlan Jefferson Finance i o Howard Martin Municipal Lab o bill Angelo Community Services o Julia Moore Public Works o Paulette Owens-Holmes Operations Analysis r , 1 r'. t 1 , CHDTF Report, page 2 d 6 HISTORY f As stated previously, the City of Denton has always contracted with the County Health Department for environmental and clinical services. In the past$ fee aseeeements for these services were computed for each service in an arbitrary manner. In May 1986, all participating cities received notification that feed would be increased due to reorganization as required by 4436b YTCS. There was little notification of the reorganization or opportunity for participating cities to respond to the issues, Of major concern was the dramatic increase in fees for all participating cities. For example, we were assessed ;152,071 for fiscal year 1986-87 as compared to $100,000 for fiscal year 1985-86. It was at this point that the City of Denton began to reassess the contractual relationship with the County Health Department and entertain the feasibility of establishing an individual health unit. We also began intensive negotiations ` with the County to foster communication, improve the level of services and r { explore options regarding the new fee assessments. Staff and members of the Council continue to work to present our concerns and clarify nebulous issues. However$ ouruconcernscSale regarding the insufficient level of communication between the County and the City, the overall level of services and the uncertainty of yearly fee assessments still remain. The level of communication between the County and City ` has improved through the negotiations of reassessment of the cost of health services for the current fiscal year. Our coat of health services was dramatically reduced from ;152,071 to ;66,742 as a result. Nonetheless, progress in these areas has not alleviated our concerns. We still our future financial obligations to the County for health services. of In addition, we are not wholly satisfied with the quality of environmental ' services received by the County. Of specific concerns is the County Health Department0s procedures for notification and enforcement of the No Smoking ' Ordinance, In the past year, our Code Enforcement Division has performed notification inspections of restaurants to enforce this ordinance. This action was necessary in order to raise the level of restaurant compliance and reduce the number of citizen complaints. Currently, the Fire Department is conduoting a similar notification process in conjunction with their annual inspections of ' retail establishments. r I ilfl f I v l s CHDTF Report, page 3 RESEARCH SUMMARY The Task Force included the following instruments/activities to complete its researchi o preliminary research conducted by the Operations l Analysis Division r o County health services contracts, budgets and activity reports F o budgets from other cities operating individual j health units j t., o interviews with County officials and City departments o individual reports and research of Task Force members j ".4 y t ~ t'i F y ~f Iv d 0y, ' F' 1• ~ q +I wi ti k nos ~Y 1 i CHDTF Report, page 4 RESEARCH In order to provide a thorough picture of our options, we researched the feasibility of operating clinical and environmental health units, A summary of our research for these is provided below. Clinical Health Services The County Health Department currently provides the following clinical servicesi* o child health care clinic o lice check o gamma globulin infections o miscellaneous injections o allergy injections o diabetes screening o adult health services o tuberculosis skin test o diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases o immunizations 1 o WIC (Women, Infants, and Children Program) By law the County must provide a certain level of clinical health services to its residents. We would then, duplicate services that the County must continue to provide by state statute, Furthermore, our research reveals that assuming t responsibility of a clinical health services unit would be a mammoth task. It would also require some medical expertise we do not have. All cities that operate individual environmental health units contract with their County Health Department for clinical services, These include Arlington, Lewisville, Carrollton, Garland, Grand Prairie and Plano. In addition, clinical services comprise over half the County's operating budget and produce very little revenue. Because it is not self-supporting, clinical 4 services would require assistance from, our general fund to operate. We tLarefore, did not consider this as a feasible or realistic option for us. By law however, we must either provide these clinical services or designate a health authority and contract with a health department, In this case we could designate the County or another licensed physician as our health authority and contract with the County at an adjusted fee (our current fee aesaesment of ( ¢66,142 is for combined environmental and clinical health services), She estimate the cost of clinical services at $42,277 (refer to TABLE 1 for calculations), *Refer to the appendix for a summary of the cueAnt activity level r Ji J CHDTF Report, page S TABLE 1 The table below provides the projected clinical services coat the City would have to pay in the event we no longer contracted with the County for environmental health services. The projected amount is $42,277. This amount was reached by subtracting the County's total amount of projected revenue for clinical health services and dividing the result by the population expected to be serviced by the County, The above described formulation provided a per capita cost for clinical health services of $ .67. Multiplying the per capita cost by i our population of 639100 produced a dollar amount of 542s277. The following table demonstrates the above described formulae Description County's Clinical Health Cost 5 2289088 a Projected Revenue - 3%119 State Contribution - 78,000 County's Net Cost $ 1199969 County's Net Cost $ 1199969 1 Total Participating Population ;'1809169 , > Per Capita Cost .67 i Per Capita Cost "VI y $ Denton Population x 63,1.67 00 5 City's Clinical Health Cost ; 429277 ;K M I Notes There is not an individual assessment for clinical services for i the current fiscal year 1986-87. We pay a combined assessment of 5669742 for clinical and environmental services. 12 ' r w ,y i a CHDTF Report, page 6 t i Environmental Health Unit The County Health Department currently provides the following environmental servicest* o Food inspection (resViurants and grocery stores) i o Septic system inspections o Health cards o Complaint inspections o Swimming pool inspections o Water well inspections o School inspecttons o Day Care and Foster Home Inspections o Loan inspections e, Our research reveals that the City currently provides a number of environmental services and it would therefore, be feasible to incorporate additional environmental services into our operations. Current City services includes t I Code enforcement Litter, trash and debris high grass Department of Public Works and weedsl Junk vehiclesl sub-standard housings and unclean conditions. Animal control Rabies control and eradication] Department of Public Works exposure casesi carcass removall A;'st impoundment, holding and disposition j of stray animalal operation &A maintenance of animal shelter. s vector control Mosquito spraying. Department of Public Works ' z4r Water pollution control and Industrial pre-treatments water and monitoring sewage testing and treatment. ; ? Utilitiea Municipal Lob Refer to the appendix for a summary of the current activity level ~ r h y ~ J .t • 7 nr1a1 i i i F l Y i CHDTF Report, page T We considered several departments/divisions to supervise the additional environmental servicesi o Operations Analysis o Planning o Municipal Lab o Department of Public Works o or a combination of these After researching the pros and cons of each, we concluded that it would be more cost effective to incorporate the environmental health unit into the Department of Public Works. The Department of Public Works currently supervises Code Enforcement and Animal Control. The supervision of additional environmental services by this department would ensure continuity of these services. The Municipal Lab would continue to provide inter pollution monitoring and control services it currently provides for the Countye e } Pros/Con ~a There are several advantages to operating our own environmental health unite o direct control of services and the authority to enforce ordinances o priority emphasis { o increased communication, teamwork, and cooperation with City 1 f departments that would lead to more effective services o assurance of service level o elimination of the uncertainty of yearly fee assessments. o potential revenue source N Even though there appears to be many advantages, there are some significant drawbacks to operating our own environmental health unite + o increased workload City-wide due to customer complaints and requests for services o potential for financial loss, particularly if it is more cost effective to contract with the County for health services E o hiring additional staff for some City departments if the increased workload cannot be accommodated by the existing staff. i r:-Y i CHDTF Report, page 8 9 ~ I We foresee however, a larger drawback than those mentioned previously. The City { of Denton is the primary user of health services provided by the County. The I County could elect to reduce or eliminate their environmental unit. This would mean a lose of revenues that currently supports the clinical health services unit. It is our understanding from County officials that the County operates on a yearly contract with the state to provide a certain level of clinical services. If there is insufficient revenues to operate the clinical services unit, the County could exercise an option to designate the County Health Department as a health unit or eliminate the clinical services unit entirely. The entire County could be adversely affected by either decision. There is yet another concern in operating an in-house environmental health unit. Our research reveals that all city-owned environmental health unite operate at a loss. These include Arlington, Carrollton, Lewisville, Plano, Grand Prairie and Garland. Funding for these individual units is subsidized 20-98% by the general fund. Budget Considerations In the event that we decide to house an environmental health unit, we have { prepared a line item budget that is complementary to the County's existing structure for environmental services (refer to TABLE 2). The proposed at environmental health unit will be housed in the Department of Public Works, located in the service center. +'c We anticipate expenditures of $131,965 for environmental health services for fiscal year 1987-88. Revenue projections total ;95,000 (refer to TABLE 3 for ` yl assumptions). Total expenditures for an environmental health unit would be (;36,965), If we contract with the County for clinical services, payment for theme services is projected at $42,277. Expenditures for both health services i € K° + exceed revenue projections by $79,242. i Our current payment to the County for clinical and environmental health services F., r is $660742. The difference between the $66,742 assessed for health services for fiscal year 1986-87 and the projected amount of $790242 for fiscal year 1987-88 is $12,500, r,. i our calculations are based on two aesumptiOASI 1, budget expenditures and revenue projections are accurate, and 2. current fee assessments for health services will be the same for fiscal year 1987-88. h S C CHDTF Report, page 9 TABLE 2 BUDGET PROPOSALS FORT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CITY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH UNIT { 1987-88 II ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET 8022 Office/Cler.0 part-time) ; 6,137 8023 Tech/Paraprof.(2) 42,574 ti 27,114 8025 MBt Supervieion (1) I 8026 Temporary Seasonal(1) 60847 8041 Civilian Overtime 150 8051 Civilian Longevity 215 8061 FICA 6,403 8062 TMRS 41925 { N 8064 Workers Comp 437 ° 8065 Health/Life Ins. 4,331 ' f q' TOTAL Personal Services S 99,740 8101 Office Supplies $ 21310 } 8102 Books/Magazines 75 8103 Small Toole/Instruments 485 8104 Gas/Oil/Diesel 11200 ' 8105 Chemical 400 400 8106 Medical Sy ° 8109 Postage 300 8110 Freight 50 8111 Janitorial `O- LAG TOTAL Supplies ; 5,220 t a 5 8342 vehicles $ 500 8344 Radio Equipment 300 a 8345 Other 100 +F!. d } r ; TOTAL Maintenance ; 900 r- i i J- " i V A0, p CHDTF Report, page 10 TABLE 2(con't) 1987-88 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION BUDGET 8501 Telephones $ 1,000 I 8502 Special Services -0- 8503 Travel Expense 3,000 8504 Advertising 105 1 8505 Dues and Publications 250 8508 City Motor Pool 2,000 8509 Hire of Equipment -0- 8518 Rent of Buildings 20000 8522 Schools/Seminars 12000 y; TOTAL Services $ 9s355 8922 City Ordinance Shop $ 50 y FY`I TOTAL Sundry ; 50 9102 Furniture/Fixtures $ 50000 9103 Office Machines 200 K 9104 Vehicles/Equipment 91000 9107 Misc. Equipment 500 9110 Radio 21000 + s Fixed Assets $ 16,700 aft' TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $1310965 ; ~ tiryt .,r t i ~ , -i PROJECTED REVENUES i 950000+ ' t SUS-TOTAL ($369965) r+,, • ,t PROJECTED CLINICAL SERVICES $ 42,277 J TOTAL SURPLUS/DEFICIT ($79,242) s`J~ 1i~4 refer to TABLE 4 for detailed assumptions t ! yr ` ~S b µ , ' C~ tie. a ~ 'dA:11P•!♦-.w..a ...:-.Mu. n.A •r ~..~.n,...:,. .r. .f 1q _,C, 1: a r CHDTF Report, page 11 TABLE 3 t 4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVENUE PROJECTIONS t~ FOR CONTINGENCY PLAN f WATER SAMPLES Anticipated Number of Samples y Fee per Sample x ; SO Revenue ; 200 FOOD PERMIT' ~ r Anticipated Number of Permits 200 ~ Fee per Permit x ;100 a r p'' r Revenue ;200000 GROCERY STORES z. ~r x Anticipated Number of Inspections 100 4;! 4 Fee per Inspection x 75 " Revenue 4 7,500 , FOOD HANDLER'S PERMIT Anticipated Number of Permits 3,500 Fee Per Permit x$15 Revenue ;52,500 r SWIMMING POOL FEES j " Anticipated Number of Inspections 100 Fee per Inspection x ;150 i. i = Revenue 4 $150000 Total Projected Revenue ;950000 " III is ' . ,:aw14Na'r.ti'Pkk".~1'If7 r ~ ; 4 CHINTF Report, page 12 We cannot make a firm recommendation to implement an in-house environmental health unit for several reasonst 1. First, we feel a need to track the revenue projections supplied by j the County over the next few months. We simply do not trust the I revenue projection data supplied by the County. i 2, Secondly, we have not received fee assessments from t" County for health services for fiscal year 1987-88. Such data should be available in June, 1987. Emergency-Contingency Plans Operating our own environmental services health unit appears to be a viabl: solution only in the event thati 1, the County eliminates the level of environmental services t we currently receive, or 2. we deem the level of service or fee assessments for " environmental and clinical services aft unacceptable. In either cane, we have prepared an emergency plan for the current fiscal year and a contingency plan for fiscal year 1987-88. These can be placed into effect if conditions warrant such action. Emergency Plan 's In the event of an emergency or the County eliminates the level of services we currently receive, we recommend the followings 1. House the environmental health unit in the Department of Public Works 2, Designate the County as our health authority for clinical services and contract for these services at an adjusted fee assessments Budget Considerations y We anticipate start-up expenditures to total $49,814 for environmental health services for the current fiscal year. Projected revenues total 3510000. Revenues exceed expenditures by 311,186. If we contract with the County for f a! clinical services, we anticipate payment of 3420277. Projected total health services cost would be ($41,091), ReCor to TABLE 4 for the line item budget. r: I A'I S 3 j CHDTF Report, page 13 TABLE 4 i BUDGET PROPOSALS FORt THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CITY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH UNIT f ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1981 EMERGENCY BUDGET 8022 Office/Cler,(1 part-time) ; 3,069 8023 Tech/Paraprof.(2) 210267 8025 Mgt/Supervision (1) _0- 8026 Temporary Seasonal(1) 60847 8041 Civilian Overtime 750 8051 Civilian Longevity -0- 8061 FICA 2,013 8062 TMRS 8064 Workers Comp 11549 8065 Health/Life Ins. 193 . 2,711 ° s1 TOTAL Personal Services = 380419 r,' w t2 8101 Office supplies $ 1,155 8102 Books/Magazines S.s+ 8103 Small Toola/Instruments 50-' 485 8104 Gas/Oil/Diesel 600 8105 Chemical 200 8106 Medical 200 8109 Postage 8110 Freight 150 8111 Janitorial so 1' TOTAL Supplies 2, 890 8342 Vehicles -0- 8344 Radio Equipment -0- # 8345 Other 100 + 1 TOTAL Maintenance i 100 r a s° ..ar V : CHDTF Report, page 14 TABLE 4(con't) C 1 1987 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION EMERGENCY BUDGET 4 8501 Telephones $ 500 8502 Special Services -0_ j 8503 Travel Expense 10500 8504 Advertising 55 8505 Dues and Publications 125 8508 City Motor Pool -0- 8509 Hire of Equipment -0- 8518 Rent of Buildings -0- 8522 Schools/Seminars 500 TOTAL Services $ 21680 8922 City Ordinance Shop ; 25 sq " TOTAL Sundry 25 1 G: Iy. 9102 Furniture/Fixtures ; 50000 f+ V~) h"";~ 9103 Office Machines 200 x. J 9104 Vehicles/Equipment _0. < 9107 Misc. Equipment 500 j 9110 Radio _0. ) Fixed Assets $ 5j700 TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ; 490814 PROJECTED REVENUES ; 510000* ,M1~ eft SUBTOTAL 11X186 PROJECTED CLINICAL SERVICES ; 42,277 ~xu+,). =Samoan , TOTAL SURPLUS/DEFICIT (;41'091) t~ 4 1,14 pro-rated amount for remainder of the fiscal year t; r V j r~ 1 F f i t CHDTF Report, page 15 i Contingency Plan In the event that we deem the level of service or fee assessments as unacceptable for the current and/or upcoming fiscal year, we recommend the following actions i 1. Notify the County of the deficiencies in the Health Department I operation and our expectations for improvement. 26 Give the County Health Department 30-90 days to correct II the deficiencies. 3. In the event that the deficiencies are not corrected, give the A County Health Department official notice of our intent to withdraw from the operation. a~ 4. Submit budget packages for creation of the n.w operation 'W. I to the Executive Committee. °K S. Prepare the organization to house the environments: health unit in the Department of Public Works. 6. Designate the County as our health authority and contract with ' the County for clinical services for the fiscal year 1987-88. 7. Implement the in-house environmental health unit October 1, 1987. Y~i1 5 ~ y r ~i t eNt 1°. Y ~~1 1 'j['. '.t 1 I1 1 1 ~ ~1 1! 1. ~1 S kl~ Y i I i ~Y. S ! qY 1 t r14 t i Y s CNDTF Report, page 16 E RECOMMENDATIONS t i J i As a result of our research, we recommend the followings 1. Continue to contract with the County, r JJJ ! , 2, rn the event that we do not wish to contract with the County, implement the appropriate emergency-contingency plan as previously outlined. 3. Submit an environmental health unit supplemental package with 4 the 1981-88 budget, The Executive Committee then, can evaluate and determine if reorganization is in the City's beat interest. a " f ~ -c s \ y ~ ~ 1 t r+M14 3 i'+' k ~ 5A f ~ r~i k a~ r ~ r J, e1 ~~~,r'Ar r 4` ~a, ~ f r t,pti A~, d r Lr ~ ',a ~ 9; Y S E 1 k 'r I i s ` C} 1 1 { { APPENDIX 0. 4F' u t 1 ,,I::l i ,I tt i 1 A l rA~~ y + 4 Ff Y t / ~ N V 6, i>V Y7 + s h y"' r ~ 4 d +AA Y ~1d..1 r~~. 1 Ir r✓' ~ry :.f f • e 1, wf ! ' 2 r s t ar i 7 ~ s 1~ r Y ; Lrp r. 1 i m ART. 44361). LOCAL PUBLIC HEALTH REORGANISATION ACT ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 4 Short title Section 1.019 This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Local j Public Health Reorganization Act. Purpose Sec. 1.029 The legislature finds that in the interest of promoting effective local public health programs it is desirable to combine prior legislative authorization into one Act which will provide a consistent, yet flexible, framework for the administration of local public health programs throughout the states Definitions Sec. 1.03. As used in this Act, unless the context otherwise zequirest I1! 'Board' means the Texas Board of Health. i r (2) 'Commissioner' means the Commissioner of Health. i? (3) 'Department' means the Texas Department of Health. (4! 'Director' means the chief administrative officer of a public health Y' " ! district or a local health departments (5) 'Health authority' means the physician who is to administer state and E \4 local laws relating to public health. (6! 'Local health department' means a department of health created by the governing body of an incorporated municipality or the commissioners court of a county pursuant to Section 4.07 of this Act. fi (7) 'Member' means a municipality, a county, or other governmental entity i which is a participant in a public health district. (8) 'Physician' means a person licensed to practice medicine by the Texas ri State Board of Medical Examiners. (9) 'Public health board' means an administrative or an advisory board of a public health district or a local health department. (10) 'Public health district' means a department of health established Ir*°w ? under Article IV of this Act. ";r (11) 'Region' means a geographic area of the State of Texas as may be determined by the department. (12) 'Regional director' means the physician who is the chief + administrative officer of a region. t, (13) 'Representative' is a person appointed to serve on a public health " board of a public health district or a local health departments ! s'r-'.,''. r (14) 'Local health unit' means a division of city or county government that )-rire, ' provides limited public health services as provided by Section 4409 of this Act@ t, +te P d ' yy ,rNt , ~kr•. k \`a +1 fi 1872• - 1 - r }a~ Y S na. v '4 ARTICLE II, CITIES AND COUNTIES Sec. 2.01. The governing body of an incorporated municipality or the commissioners court of a county is empowered to enforce any law which is reasonably necessary to protect the public health. Sec. 2.02. The governing bodies of incorporated municipalities and the commissioners courts of the counties may cooperate with one another in making necessary improvements and providing services to promote the public health in accordance with The Interlocal Cooperation Act (Article 4413(3200 Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). Sec. 2.03. The governing body of an incorporated municipality or the commissioners court of a county which has not established a public health j district or a local health department may appoint a health authority to service its jurisdiction. The commissioners court shall set the compensation i of its health authority, except that the compensation, including a salary, may be allowed only for services actually rendered. ARTICLE III, HEALTH AUTHORITIES Sec. 3,01. (a1 A health authority shall perform all duties which are necessary to implement and enforce any law to protect the public health and all duties as may be prescribed by the board. Such duties shall include but r are not limited to the following. 11) establishing, maintaining, and enforcing quarantine within the health "r authority's jurisdictions isM1' 12) assisting and aiding the board in all matters of local quarantine, h inspection, disease prevention and suppression, birth and death statistics, s and general sanitation within the health authority's jurisdictions t (3) reportin, to the board, in such manner and form and at such times as it shall prescribe, the presence of contagious, infectious, and dangerous epidemic diseases within the health authority's jurisdictions (4) reporting to the board on all other matters as may be proper for the f board to directi and (5) aiding the board at all times in the enforcement of proper rules, regulations, requirements, and ordinances and in the enforcement of all r sanitation laws, quarantine regulations, and vital statistics collections in the health authority's jurisdiction, (b) The board shall hold an annual conference for health authorities and a s directors presided over by the commissioner or the commissioner's designee, tbvc " The counties and municipalities may pay the necessary expenses incurred by t their respective health authorities and/or director in attending the conference, L~era ~r^ Sec. 3602, Is) A health authority shall bes f T, 1, 1 (1) a competent physician who is legally qualified to prr,:tice medicine under the laws of this state and who is of reputable professional standings and s5- i (2) a resident of the State of Texas. ~ I S. 18t2s 2 . S «i 4 a . s (b) A health authority is a state officer when performing duties prescribed by state law. An appointee must take and subscribe to the official oath and file a copy of the oath and appointment with the board. He or she shall not be deemed legally qualified until such documents are filed. A health authority serves for a term of two years and may be reappointed for successive terms. (c) A health authority may be removed from office for cause pursuant to the personnel procedures applicable to the heads of departments of the jurisdiction in which he or she serves. ARTICLE IV, HEALTH DISTRICTS ' Sec. 4.01. (a) By a majority vote of each governing body, a public health district may be established by: (1) two or more counties; (2) two or more incorporated municipalities; (3) a county and one or more incorporated municipalities situated thereins or (4) two or more counties and one or more incorporated municipalities ff situated therein. I Sec. 4,02, A public health district is authorized to perform the public health functions that any of its members is authorized to perform unless otherwise restricted by law, C Sec. 4.03. (a) The members shall prepare a written instrument to be known x,x J as a cooperative agreement which shall set out fully the terms of the operation of the public health district including but not limited to. (1) organizational structure and financial administrations ter. " (2) procedures for modification of the cooperative agreements 4 (3) procedures for the admission withdrawal, and expulsion of members (4) procedures for the dissolution of the organizations and (5) procedures for the selection and removal of a director r' (b) The cooperative agreement may provide for the creation of an advisory r or administrative public health board, The public health board may perform ynv any function relating to the operation of the public health district required under the terms of the cooperative agreements An 'advisory public health ir41r' board' shall advise members and the directors on tatters of public health. An 'administrative public health board' shall have the authority to adopt as substantive and procedural rules which are necessary and appropriate to promote and preserve the health and safety of the public within Its jurisdictions provided that no rule adopted shall be in conflict with the laws of the state or the ordinances of any member municipality or county, The < cooperative agreement shall include provisions whichs 11) describe a method for the selection of representatives to the public health boards R (2) specify the composition and number of the representatives constituting the public health boards ! 1072a 3 _ ti (3) determine the lengths of the terms of the representativea, provide that the terms be staggered, and allow for the filling of vacancies for unexpired termst (4) require that representatives on the public health board shall have resided within the territorial limits of the public health district for a period of three years prior to their selection; (5) require that representatives on the public health board shall serve without compensation; (6) dascribe a procedure for the removal of a public health board representative and provide substantive criteria upon which the initiation of the procedure may be basedt and E (7) define the relationship between the director and the public health board. (c) The cooperative agreement shall be approved by the governing body of each member and shall be signed by the appropriate officers of each governing body. Modification of the cooperative agreement shall be in writing and effective upon approval by the governing body of each member. (d) A copy of the cooperative agreement and any subsequent modifications shall be included in the minutes of the governing body of each member and shall be filed with the county clock of affected counties, the city clerk of affected municipalities, and the department* sec. 4.04. (a) The members shall appoint a director of the public health district. (b) The director shall be a physician and shall be the health authority within the jurisdiction of the public health district. Nonphysicians serving as directors on the effective date of this Act may continue to serve in that capacity, in which case the members shall appoint a physician to be the health authority within the jurisdiction of the public health district. ~ } (c) The director shall serve as an ex officio nonvoting member of any public health board established by the cooperative agreement. " (d) A member may designate a person to perform its appointment duties under this section. Sec. 4605. A school district or other governmental entity may apply to become a member of a public health district. The governing body of each ^t, member shall review the application. if a majority of each member approves the application, the school district or other governmental entity may be admitted to membership upon such terra as are acceptable to the applicant and members. Sec. 4.06 Membece shall provide for payment of costs necessary for implementation of the public health district including but not limited to the costs fort (3) staff selaciest (2) supplies) ' (3) suitable office quarterst (4) health and clinic centecst (5) health services and facilities; and (6) maintenance I 16728 - 4 Sec. 1.07 (a) BY a majority vote, the governing body of an incorporated, municipality or the commissioners court of a county may establish a local health department. (b) A local health department is authorised to perform all public health functions which the incorporated municipality or county to authorized to perform. (c) The governing body of an incorporated municipality or the commissioner's court of a county shall appoint a physician as a director of the local health department, and the director shall be the health authority within the jurisdiction of the local health department. Nonph}3icians serving as directors on the effective date of this Act may continue to serve in that capacity, in which case the governing body or the commissioners court shall appoint a physician to be the health authority within the jurisdiction of the local health department. The governing body or the commissionets court may designate a person to perform its appointment duties under this section. The commissioners court shall set the compensation of the director and the health authority in its jurisdiction, except that the compensation, including e salary, may be allowwd only for services actually rendered. (d) The governing body of an incorporated municipality may provide for the creation of an administrative or advisory public health board. The commission- era court of a county may provide for the creation of an advisory public health board. The director shall serve as an ex officio nonvoting member t-f ,i any public health board established for the local health department. 'f Sec. 4.064 (a) The governing body of an incorporated :unieipality, the commissioners court of a county, or the administrative board of a public health district may adopt ordinances or rules to charge fees for public health services subject to the followings (1) no individual shall be denied public to pay for services, and the municiit / heecounty, rc districts Inability shall i make provisions for a reduced fee or no fee for individuals 'knable to pay for services in whole or in parts and (2) if a local health unit, local health department, or public health district receivas state support for the provision of public health services, then the Uniform Grant and Contract Management Act of 1981 (Article 4413 (32g), Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), and standards adopted pursuant to that Act shall control where applicable. (b) for purposes of this section, 'public health services' means personal health promotion and maintenance services, infectious disease control and prevention services, environmental and consumer health programs, laboratory services, public health education and information services, and administrative services. Sec. 1,09. (a) For purposes of this Act, a public health district, local health department, and local health unit shall be identified by its program of E public health services. ? (b) a public health district and a local health department shall provide at leash (1) personal health promotion and maintenance servicesr ' f f I 1812s -S- 1 r (2) infectious disease control and prevention services; (3) environmental and consumer health programs for enforcement of health and safety laws related to food, water, waste control, general sanitation, and vector control; 141 public health education and information servicesr (5) laboratory services; and (6) administrative services. (c) A division of a city or county government providing public health services that does not qualify as a public health district or local health department under Subsection 1b) of this section is classified as a local health units (d) A public health district, local health department, or local health unit may become affiliated with the department to facilitate the exchange of information and the coordination of public health services, To become affiliated, the entity shall annually provide to the department information a conccrningr 41) services provided; 42) staffing patterns; and e (3) funding sources and budget. j (e) The department may enter into contracts with public health districts, local health departments, and local health units for the provision of public health services. j (f) The board may adopt rules necessary to implement this section. y However, nothing in this Act shall be construed to grant the board of any x district created hereunder the power to adopt rules or regulations for any part of the district which are not otherwise specifically authorized by state law. ARTICLE Ve PUBLIC HEALTH REGIONS s Sece 5,01, The board may establish public health regions to provide public health services within the states Secs 5.02. For each public health region created, the board shall appoint a physician to serve as regional director. The board shall establish r qualifications and terms of employment of a regional directors ` Sec. 5,03 The board or its designee may appoint a regional director to 4i perform the duties of a health authority. The regional director may perform the duties of a health authority within the region as authorized by the board or the commissioner in a jurisdiction which is not served by a health ' authority or In a jurisdiction served by a health authority who ban failed to x perform duties prescribed by the board pursuant to Section 3,01 of this Act, ,a n a ~I I w i a ' Ia u ~ 1+]f 1 1872a _ 6 . r 4. ei,' COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR: CITY OF DENTON CLINICAL SERVICES 1986-87 t ` Nov, Dec. Jan. Feb. mar. Apr- May Jun. Total Maternity clinic 1 1 4 6 15 19 46 Child Citric 52 55 90 84 75 69 69 55 549 Bib injections 5 3 1 3 1 11 6 30 - 26 21 14 27 15 14 6 25 148 V.D. Clinic Immunization Clinic 236 212 278 189 208 229 219 235 1,806 Diabetic Screening 0 ~ C r 1 1 1 1 4 1 9 Allergy injections j 'k 1~ T8 Tests 33 17 47 58 21 24 14 24 214 + 3 1 8 r' GG Injections 4 ' 3 8 9 1 1 3 29 Lice checks Overseas 2 11 2 1 4 20 38 78 s t' Home Visits 7 1 2 S 1 16 Y B/P Check 4 2 1 2 I 9 19 2,952 Activity Total 4 s 1708j/5 -T - i } k S { i COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR: CITY OF DENTON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1986-87 F i i NOV. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Total Restaurant Food Spot Inspection 45 S1 31 62 46 44 70 3,9 I Restaurant Food Reinspectlon 9 10 11 6 1 13 15 55 Grocery permits 6 4 4 14 5 14 6 7 60 Grocery Complaints 3 4 3 2 2 7 2 23 t ` Grocery Spot Inspections 27 27 12 7 23 22 19 21 158 i Day Care 10 9 1 2 5 1 2 30 t'I Foster Home 28 4 32 School Inspections 2 7 9 J s:,t rh n Day Care Spot Inspections 1 1 2 r` Day Care Complaints 1 1 A 'P Court Cases 1 1 Health Card Attendance 14D 183 206 1 257 159 212 1,158 Health Card Classes 16 22 20 25 18 22 123 Septic System Specifications 1 2 3 Septic system Inspections 1 3 4 r +y i i County Health Department Activity Report Environmental Services Page 2 r I Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. Ma Jun. Total i i Septic System Reinspections 1 1 r Phone Call Consultations 81 121 87 113 117 105 86 121 833 F Sewage complaints 4 6 8 10 17 / 6 5 60 Sewage Complaints Reinspections 1 1 5 7 12 5 12 43 ` Loan (Septic) 1 2 1 4 j Loan (slater) 1 1 i , Trash Complaints 4 2 1 3 8 6 2 3 29 S ~ e•" Miscellaneous Letters 3 3 7 10 9 9 2 43 Animal Sites 0 Vector complaints 2 3 5 2 4 16 32 Pre-opening Inspections (rood) 10 17 11 14 7 9 30 15 93 Restaurant Food Permits 14 18 17 10 12 25 7 103 Restaurant Food Complaints B 15 6 4 7 5 10 5S Office Consultations 6 11 7 10 5 12 17 68 On-Site Consultations 11 7 6 9 6 7 16 62 Charges 1 1 r; -9- County Health Department Activity Report Environmental Services Page 3 Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar, A Dr. Ma Jun. Total Smoking ordinances 2 1 2 1 1 7 I -T-T~ Water complaints 3 1 f 3 6 ' I Water Reinspections 1 1 2 i Loan Reinspections 0 Animal Complaints 2 Odor Complaints 2 2 Water 1 1 61 ' , j Pool Inspections 6 3 3 102 112 r Miscellaneous Complaints 3 8 11 illegal w Other 2 1 3 7 5 1 19 `g^ a Pool Reinspections 1 102 103 _4 J Pool complaints 2 1 3 r ,5 Grocery Reinspections 5 1 1 / 7 21 Day Care Reinspections 27 2 11 13 Food Permits 10 12 25 7 15 69 10 - y f a County Health Department Activity Report Environmental Services Page 4 i i Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb, Mar. Apr. May Jun. Total I i rood complaints 4 7 5 10 18 44 ` rood Rechecks 6 1 13 15 19 54 ; Food Spot Checks 62 46 44 70 63 285 ` I Day Care Pre-Opening 1 1 2 1 Day Care Recheck 1 2 25 28 y. Mobile Unit Permits 2 4 3 9 a Activity Total 40259 d A 1 _ T ~ . ~r , 5. tiff - Y'ytl d, 1 d 1 1 T- t tl l . tav k fir.. ` / . 1 Y t, . rr ' E , j 1708J/4 - 11 - t t DATE: 08/04/87 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i r FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ANNEIATION OF A 1,000 FOOT STRIP EAST OF I-35 LOCATED NORTH OF RECTOR ROAD ALONG CLEAR CREEK. (A-49) RECOMMENDATION: If the Council is interested in proceeding, staff recommends this alignment due to the natural boundaries and that the least number of property owners will be affected. 3 SUMMARY. The annexation is proposed to create the northern boundary of the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction and to increase the City's j ability to control the area near Lake Ray Roberto. BACKGROUND: Y This annexation is consistent with current City Policy. An i annexation of a 500 foot strip along I-35 is bein li . g processed at this time ' PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: j All departments involved in the development process. ;i FISCAL INPAC Attempts have been made to Include as few structures as possible an6 a limited amount of road frontage. Rer~ fully suba ~ s e Prepared by: C Manager x fi bet& C'aJ~ ' Cecile Carson Urban Planner Ai}prove * I David Ellison Acting Director for Planning and Development 1975e 3 i t D q. SAC t 30 AC 42Ae- QCL.A CCWP p u Je. N IAlA'7M f77 Ae PoweLC 2 ll~ 4t.5 Ac 4♦ a7,1 {C SHeRrt Itf aLLAe S4 aGC, B N.3Ac fr.h A INS.-HWY. 35 A. A. i ~ q~♦ Oy ILL n tt.lA't. !1.' AC D 4 S0. At y, try Aesl r p LOCKfTT ~ PA rprirrseN, 2A2Ae ^ `2 9 ~ 0 ~ D /Ie./ Ae tk y q v fog ♦ti , 2Yw' ~a m~q ♦ Z n y ~G ~ ,2 p O A• n F 9 gs yy A n 'flp qyS A A / ETSCH H TR .4 At y Se O o 0 X y; r, 182. 4 L y 2 2 H = o u \ L A r,44 At w LwF 14 Ac sus. Rd, Ac 4V E a a~ R~efor ti q2 V BG q9 v 4c R408 Y ~p Sam rA E7SCN .0 <0SHOPPR Bi Ct ~F IBO Ac O,r IY n S~ 1. H. KLVAI I F 9 O .Pb /TkOOM3 54 AC qq0 N A t G F ~ J~~ S. ygFL n n C T n O 117J LC, ~In -4 n 0 AO O a 'Poo D R f C V ; 7, 6$.g Ac s n ~ r~ q yFS o ~J9S0y f 23Ae 32 At 1 JhMMY #AY, erAL 4 V 2ll.SAc q♦Oi O 7417 At 71/ ' ,p♦ N ~i S q y!J n C ♦ O 0 's p tis ~ ~eRr t a R e. Poore M t y u J7Ae. ~ I!3 C SMALL 23.SAe. T ~ y bee t TRACTS N, y 6 148A9. 111 J. NARDie q 1 b R ' q X A 4oAe bR0 m ~ ,p D a ` A ~j N ~ ,y` N11A T A N ~vtrAS S d b ~ ~ ~ .1 6AC IN J"♦ ~1 ~ y09 ^ C N D 4 9 ; r N C ~ Jl.eAc d y!• ~ ` ~ V rl 30 At. N i... 2 }q 3 ^ : q 00, I i i DATE: August 4, 1987 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITLM 1 i TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: RECEIVE REPORT ON NTSU COGENERATION STUDY PERFORMED BY f LUTZ, DAILY AND BRAIN. ~ j RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of July 22, 1987, recommended to the City Council acceptance of the Lutz, Daily, Brain Feasibility Study on Cogeneration with ' NTSU and that the Staff continue to monitor the feasibility of this project with NTSU. SUMMARY: ' Enclosed with the Agenda is the final report on NTSU Cogeneration performed by Lutz, Daily and Brain. A r summary of the results follows. `i The best economical choice for a cogeneration unit for { the NTSU campus is the installation of two (2) 3700 BW j+ gas turbine generator units with exhaust heat being discharged into a boiler/absorption chiller system. The ` overall ca ital investment would be p $15,4359000 consisting of $6.0 million for the gas turbine generator, $4.0 million for the boiler/chiller unit and $5.4 million „ for the hot/chilled water distribution system. Considering the debt service on this investment and the 61 return on Investment payment, there would be a rr s $637,765 loss to the Electric Department. Sn.r If NTSU were to pay for the Installation of the hot/chilled water distribution system at a cost of $S.4 million, there would be a $316,260 savings possible, that could be available to the Electric Customers and NTSU. However, no allowance is made to fund any payments for i .y the hot/chilled water distribution system. Considering that renton will require additional 1 c generating capacity in the 1991 to 1993 time period it may be possible to participate or contract with NTSU or a third party for such capacity that could be constructed in conjunction with a district heating and cooling system f at NTSU. Such participation would have to be analyzed In comparison with possible sources from TMPA or TMPP, other utilities in Texas and in light of TMPA contract ` restrictions. The Staff recommends that Denton continue to work with NTSU to determine if there is a mutually beneficial opportunity to participate or contract with NTSU or a third party for such capacity. R ..a v BACKGROUND: NTSU Is the City's largest electric customer with a 1986 demand of 14 MW, usage of 69 GWH at a cost of $4.75 million dollars. NTSU has entered into agreement with Impell to study a cogeneration project financed by a third party based on sale of the energy and capacity to an outside utility buyer. The final proposal is due in November 1987. At this time, It is not known if there is a market for this proposed sale of power and energy at a price which would financially support the cost of this type project. i Any cogeneration project for NTSU would reduce their I electric energy requirements since there would be a i conversion from electric motor drive air conditioning to absorption type units for campus cooling. A study has } been made to determine feasibility of the City being a participant which would benefit both the City and NTSU. The equipment was selected to serve the total electrical load. Three sizes were used to determine the lowest life cycle cost. Evaluations were made for the units to follow either steam load or electric load. The two {2} 3700 KW j ' units operated in the electric follow mode are the most !f economical. Costs based on ownership were made which show that if I total cost, including the thermal distribution system, is, included, the project would not be economically feasible. If the thermal system cost is allocated to NTSU, the yj project shows that total energy cost could be less. f The present status is such that it must wait until NTSU and Impell determine the course of their project. NTSU justification for the installation of the central hot and chilled water distribution system is beyond the scope of this study. However, there has been a study for improvement of this ' thermal distribution system which recommended its installation. The study surfaced several areas which will have to be addressed for any major cogeneration customer. f 1. Standby and supplemental demand charges. With small f cogeneration units, the City would have little problems furnishing power and energy at standard rates, In the case studied, any supplemental demand which occurred which attributed to the maximum system peak load would change the TMPA fixed cost allocation for the year following the occurrence. E This cost could reach $120/XW/yr. C i 2. Different type energy rates will need to be developed to serve large cogeneratoos who serve a majority of their base load and only use the utility for peak requirements. 3. TMPA contract restrictions for City participation in any generation project. 4. PUC approval of cogeneration rats. 5. EPA- non-attainment rules. With an investment by Denton of $10,000,000 and the Electric Department paying a $69S,960 return on investment, there is a 316,260 savings that could be " realized and distributed between NTSU and the City. k However, no allowance is made for debt service payments for NTSU's investment in the heating/cooling distribution i system. a PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, NTSU and the Electric Utility customers, ' y FISCAL IMPACT: i Minimum: Loss of electric revenue due to conversion from - electric drive for compressors to absorption { units. "pk N Maximum: Loss of all electric revenue which would l require rate increase to other customers. Resp tfully submitted, LlOd Harrell u5 City Manager Prop red by proved by: R. E. Nelson, Executive lrector Department of Utilities ,r. EXHIBIT I Cogeneration Feasibility Study 4993U:18-20 ~ y S EXCERPT MINUTES PUB MEETING OF 7/22/87 6. RECEIVE REPORT ON COGENERATION FEASIBILITY STUDY OF NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY. Nelson opened discussion on this item by stating that NTSU has been studying the feasibility of cogeneration for the past one to two years. Denton has looked into the cogeneration question to determine what opportunity exists for Denton to participate NTSU. that would beneficial to both the City and Fznnesey with Lutz, Daily and Brain, who gave an overview of the feasibility study just completed for the City. i The best economical choice for a cogeneration, unit for i ~ the NTSU campus is the installation of two (2) 3700 KW i gas turbine generator units with exhaust heat being discharged Into a boiler/absorption chiller system. The overall capital investment would be $1504351000 consisting of $6.0 million for the gas turbine generator, for 0 million for the boiler/chiller diunit and stribution.4 smillion ystem. Considering the debt service on this investment and the 61 return on investment payment, there would be a $637,765 loss to the Electric Department. 4 If NTSU were to pay for the installation of the hot/chilled water distribution system at a cost of $S.4 million, there would be a $316,260 savings possible, that could be available to the Electric Customers and NTSU. However, no allowance is made to fund any payments for the hot/chilled water distribution system. Considering that Denton will require additional generating capacity in the 1991 to 1993 time period it may be possible to participate or contract with NTSU or a third party for such capacity that could be constructed in conjunction with a district heating and cooling system at NTSU. Such participation would have to be analyzed in comparison with possible sources from TMPA or TMPP, other utilities in Texas and in light of TMPA contract restrictions. The Staff recommends that Denton continue to work with NTSU to determine if there is a mutually beneficial opportunity to participate or contract with NTSU or a third party for such capacity. NTSU is the City's largest electric customer with a 1986 9 demand of 14 MW, usage of 69 GWH at a cost of $4.75 million dollars. NTSU has entered into agreement with Impell to study a cogeneration project financed by a third party based on sale of the energy and capacity to an outside utility buyer. 1 I s i The final proposal is due in November 1987, At this time, it is not known if there is a market for this proposed sale of power and energy at a price which would financially support the cost of this type project. Any cogeneration project for NTSU Could reduce their electric energy requirements since there would be a conversion from electric motor drive air conditioning to absorption type units for campus cooling. A study has been made to determine feasibility of the City being a participant which would benefit both the City and NTSU. The equipment was selected to serve the total electrical load. Three sizes were used to determine the lowest life cycle cost. Evaluations were made for the units to follow either steam load or electric load. The two (2) 3700 KW units operated in the electric follow mode are the most economical. 1 Costs based on ownership were made which show that if j total cost, including the thermal distribution system is included, tht project would not be economically feasible. If the thermal system cost is allocated to NTSU, the project shows that total energy cost could be less. The present status is such that it must wait until NTSU and Impell determine the course of their project. NTSU i justification for the installation of the central hot and chilled water distribution system is beyond the scope of this study. f; However, there has been a study for improvement of this thermal distribution system which recommended its r` installation. The study surfaced several areas which will have to be addressed for any major cogeneration customer. 1. Standby and supplemental demand charges. With small cogeneration units, the City would have little problems furnishing power and energy at standarl rates. In the case studied, any supplemental demand which occurred which attributed to the maximum system peak load would change the TMPA fixed cast allocation for the year following the occurrence, This cost could reach $120/KW/yr. 2. Different type energy rates will need to be developed to serve large cogenerators who serve a majority of their base load and only use the utility for peak requirements. 3. TMPA contract restrictions for City participation in any generation project. r 4. PUC approval of cogeneration rates. 5. EPA- non-attainment rules. With an investment by Denton of $10,000,000 and the Electric Department paying a $6459460 return on investment, there is a .)316,260 savings that could be realized and distributed between NTSU and the City. However, no allowance is made for debt service payments for N'TSU's investment in the heating/cooling distributi,)n system. Minimum: Loss of electric revenue due to conversion from f electric drive for compressors to absorption 1 units. Maximum: Loss of all electric revenue which would r require rate increase to other customers. Frady asked what the normal life span of a cogeneration " plant would be. The Engineers replied approximately 4 twenty years. Thompson commented Denton committed to building its capacity largely because of the Universities' requirements. He inquired as to the possible competitive sales of electricity to others by ' the University. Chairman Laney stated the court ruling „ indicated that cogeneratoos must sell surplus to local utilities at avoided costs and the utilities have to take it, but the Generator (NTSU) can also sell retail. After further discussion, Thompson made a motion to ! accept the study and to direct the staff to continue to monitor the feasibility of this project with NTSU. i Second by LaForte. All ayes, no nayes, motion carried. r' w 1 I i. ~ i l ~ µ r 1 i 1 CITY of DIMON ! 215 E. McKinney I Denton, Texas 76201 1 1 , t MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 30, 19B7 to: RICK SVEHLA, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER FROM: JERRY CLARK! P.E., CITY ENGINEER RE: WILLOWWOOD BIKE PATH We completed a cost estimate for the bike path on Wiilowwood at the time it was brought before Traffic Safety. Our cost q estimate totaled $71,000.00. ` The bike path is to be located tin the north -aide of r Willowwood between Highland Park and Kendolph for a distance of 0001. Our recommendation for location between Kendolph and Westwood is an the south side for a distance or about t~ { r 19001. °1+ Ilia basic cost breakdown include about $42,000.00 for land acquisition and construction casts. Drainage costs will total $250000.009 excavation costs of $3,400.00 and signage v` to ti casts of $1100.00. Right-Of-way currently dedicated is Fairly narrow whict. results in significant land k, acquisition. We have a drawing on file that shouts existing r*r r yx. and proposed right-o`-way. „ t'S Please advis: It further information is needed. w d t ' j4 a'jt "j r" Jerry Lurk, P.E. W„' y City Engineer 1, { , 17 Cpl x t i. N 1 ' 1 ' q r rUat~A 11 lp" , y, q , G 6 DRAINAGE f I I. Drainage Plan A. Levels of protection Street flooding requirements f r C, Pipe versus channels E , f II, New Sub-di Visions A, Use of the drainage plan to help in the initial design. .r .t B. Actual design C. Requirements for off site improvements III, Existing Developments or Existing Zoned Property " A, Design requirements for existing drainage s B, Requirements to eliminate flooding of adjacent land r 1 IV, Development of CIP Projects y, A. Use of drainage plan to help design major systems rN B. Complaints and areas of flooding that we are aware of C. Tying major existing systems together i V, Legal implications A. FEMA requirements B. Disputes between adjacent land owners and/or the City C. New legislation (impact fees) I J. !a i e 3545M it ' '7~ i 706 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES / June 23, 1987 The Council convened into the Work session at 5:15 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem McAdams) Council Members Ayer, and Boyd. ABSENT: Council Members Alexanaer, Gorton, and Hopkins. Item #2 was moved ahead in the agenda order. 4 2. The council received a report on TMPA activities from City of Denton TMPA Board officials. Dr. Roland Vela presented an official written statement from the TMPA General Manager, Ed Wagoner, responding to some concerns/questions that had been raised oy the Puulic Utilities Board and the City Council. Richard Stewart stated that the budget for next year would be $29.3 million less than last year. It would be the best budget so far and it had been given to memUers of the Board in plenty of time to study it. Council Members Alexander, Gorton and Hopkins joined the meeting, The Council convened into Executive session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. More specifically to polo a discussion of litigation including Maverick vs. the City of Denton and the County of Denton vs. I t'. the City of Denton. No official action was taken. L The Council then convened into the special call meeting at 7:0U rp+ i I p.m. in the Council Chambers. ` PRESENT: Mayor Stephens: Mayor Pro Tem McAaawal Council Members Alexander, Ayor, Boyd, Gorton, and Hopkins. ABSENT: None 1. The Council received a Finance officers' Association awarder tot distinguished ebudget presentation. Y, r Y H N Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this was a high honor for the City and for the Council. " Deborah Forte, Regional Director for the Texas Government ' Finance Officer's Association, presented the at;ard to John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance. % i r Y 1 4 r i City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 2 2. The Council considered a request from the Kiwanis Children of c Pecan place Street a from banner June across July 5~c1987,at the intersection 4th e eveni that they be allowed to John Adami, banner a for their Julyrequested place the Alexander motion, Hopkins second to approve the request. Motion carried unanimously. , 3, The Council considered a request from the North Texas Oak and Fair Association cand iacross hang N Locust between N. Elm between Oak and Pecan Streets from August 3 - August 30, 1987. Susan Phillipa of the Fair Association requested that they be allowed to place the banner for the North Texas Pair. , z McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the request. Motion carried unanimously. 4, The Council received a report from Dr. Roland Vela regarding the proposed tree ordinance. Dr. Vela stated that many large trees had been cut down in south Denton. He asked that the process for the tree ordinance be speeded up to protect area trees. He presented the Council with a copy of an ordinance from the City of Austin to perhaps use as a model for the City of Denton's ordinance. S. The Council received a report from Mr. Truman Harp regarding a water erainage problem on Robinwood Street ry '~i} Mr. Harp resided at 2401 Robinwood. His problem was that the City was going to block an easement that went to the back portion of his property. Mr. Harp used that easement for 11 years as a driveway to the back portion of his property. He r had presented two alternatives to the City Engineers but was told that those alternative would not work, He suggested that the Council Members drive past his property and view the easement. . 6, The Council considered a petition of Cross Timbers Girl Scout Council requesting a specific use permit in an agricultural (A) zoning district on a S.4 acre tract located at 4000 West University Drive (U.S. Highway 380). The property was further described as Lot 60 Block E, Ranch Estates Subdivision. This property was currently the site of an abandoned veterinary clinic. If approved, the specific use permit would allow the utilization of the existing structure and premises for use as the office/headquarters and activity/training center of the Cross Timbers Girl Scout Council. S-193 1 Y City of Denton city council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 3 r The Mayor opened the public hearing, Carol Roberts, Executive Director of the Girl scouts, spoke in favor of the petition. She stated that the site would be administrative offices and headquarters for the Girl Scout Council. It would also be a training facility for the Uirl Scout leaders. It was not the intent of the Scouts to have unlimited camping on the site and all activities would be well supervised. The size, location and sanitation facilities limited the use, by camping standards, set by the Girl Scouts-U.S.A. as well as the State. The activities on the site for overnight purposes would be for adult/ulder girl training in camping skills, hosting traveling troops from other Councils, a gathering of a troop embarking on a trip to leave the next morning. All of these activities would be limited in size as stated by previous standards. Roberts stated that there was some communication difficulties with Planning and zoning which possibly he ter stemmed from the difference in f definitions of the term "camping'. She had a problem with tae restriction placed in the ordinance cry Planning and Zoning which restricted no overnight camping at the site. Mayor Pro Tem McAdams asked Roberts for her definition of 'camping' f Roberts stated that uvernight camping to Planning and 'Loving ` meant unrestricted large numbers of the case as there were other sites avagirls. Tha would not e ilable tort large numbers 't of girls. The site would not permit a large number of girls or adults at one time. Planning and Zoning's concern was the noise factor. at night for a large group of girls because of the residential area. 501 1 1+s} Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the recommended ordinance from Planning and Zoning stated two conditions for the special use permit. The condition that was of concern to the Girl Scouts was that overnight camping wculd not be ` permitted, staff had several recommendations for the Council in dealing with the camping issue. The first recommendation yrr" was to insert 'overnight-outside camping shall not be w~ permitted`, That would be an amendment to the ordinance which would allow the Girl Scouts to proceea with the purchase of the property. The second recommendation was that any other more f c t s ~ comprehensive change in the ordinance, such as allowing camping under certain conditions, be considered an amendment to the s specific use permit and would Zoning process. If the back through the Planning and process s needed to go back to Planning and Zoning, staff recommended to Council that the fees required for rezoning be waived, 4. Council Member Boyd asked if the plain. Property was in the flood x. City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 4 Roberts stated, that the property was in the flood plain but drainage work was planned with a drainage ditch in front and a change in the water flow toward the easement. Mark Chew spoke in favor of the petition, he felt that it was a worthwhile project and asked that the Council pass the petition. f Dixie Clardy spoke in favor of the petition. She stated that i the Council had grown considerably over the years and needed j office space to meet its needs. The site would house overnight II camping only for training purposeo. Council Member Alexander asked if the Scouts were comfortable with the conditions as stated by the City Manager. r Clardy replied that she felt uncomfortable with those + conditions since the training purposes would require outside camping, V Council Member Hopkins stated that the sale of the property might depend on the camping issue and that the project should not be held up because of that one issue. Debra Urayovitch, City Attorney, stated that the advertisement 4 of the public hearing listed uffice use and administrative use, not camping, i'ne public was not aware of any other use tnan administrative and office use, t Fr,Y Janetta Bogart asked if the ordinance as R; approved, what would tnat do in regards to presented were getting + restrictions or presenting another program with Planning Band zoning. Mayor Stephens replied that the Council could send the proposal back to Planning and Zoning and waive the fees to work out the details of the camping issue, " Council Member Boyd asked if the ordinance was passed in the t`1 t: current form and no outside camping was available, would the Scouts want the property. Bogart stated if the outside of the property could not be used as was initially intended, they may not want the property, She r stated that they were to close on the property on Wednesday. Betty Webb spoke in favor of the petition, She stated that the E land use was important to the overall use of the facility, The training would be for adults/older youth which would never be more than two nights at one time. No one spoke in opposition. ,3 s City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 f Page 5 The Mayor closed the public hearing. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that the original petition ' was for office use and that the staff had evaluated the proposal based on that use. As the property was in the flood plain and the flood way, there would be improvements necessary forms were mailed with 1 returned in Six reply for drainage. favor and 1 in opposition. A concern was raised by residents regarding noise, safety and supervision. Council Member Gorton left the meeting. Item 6.B. was moved ahead in the agenda order. B. The Council considered a petition of City of Denton requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to single family with 7,000 square foot lots (SF-7). The property x was located east of Audra Lane at the intersection of Lattimore x, Street and Oak Tree Street and was described as Lots 20-28,• j Block A; Lots 1-11, Block B; and Lots 8-10, Block C, of the Audra Estates Addition. Z-1858 The Mayor opened the public hearing. r r• ' j No one spoke iii favor. No one spoke in opposition, o % r The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Gorton returned to the meeting. gg Cecil Carson, Urban Planner, stated that thasina1984t with issue. The Audra Estate subdivision was approved a portion of the property zoned agricultural and platted with SF-4 land use. This was a petition to correct that difference. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval. 1. The Council considered adoption of an Audra ~ • ordinance aP6lockngB e and gLots 8 10, g BlockLots C, 20of8,the Block Lots 1-11, Estates Addition. The following ordinance was considered: ~ NO. 67.114 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, zk,,a+ I BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP i APPLIES TO LOTS 20 THROUGH 28, BLOCK A; LOTS I THROUGH 11, BLOCK B; AND LOTS 8 THROUGH 100 BLOCK C OF THE .,L J. City of Denton City council minutes June 23, 1987 Page 6 AUDRA ESTATES ADDITION, LOCATED LAST OF AUDRA LANE AT THE INTERSECTION OF LATTIMORE STREET AND OAK TREE STREET, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINI TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FRUM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIUNATION TO SINGLE-FAMILY 'SF-7' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION) PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $1,UUO.UU FOR V10LATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins aye, Gorton 'aye," Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye," and Mayor Stephens ~ 'aye. Motion carried unanimously. 7. Consent Agenda Mayor Stephens stated that Item 7.A.1. was pulled for public discussion. McAdams motion, Boyd second to approve th3 Consent Agenda with the exception of Item 7.A.1. Motion carries' unanimously. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that 7.A.1. was being recommended by staff to gu to the second lowest biuaer. John Marshall, Purchasing Agent, stated that ne had been r notified by the R. L. Roberts Construction Company, the low 1 bidder, that they would not be axle to perform the contract. I The Company was going to file for bankruptcy. The next low bia I was from the Jagoe-Public Company and that was the bid that was f being recommended. Council Member Gorton asked if the withdrawal by R. L. Roberts was in writing. Marshall replied no. He assumed that it was the advise of his attorney not to put anything in writing at this time. McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve Item 7.A.1. on the i Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. b ; Consent Agenda ^rFS A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #9752 - Lillian Miller Parkway Paving & i , Drainage jJ ~ City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 7 Bid #9756 - Avenue c Paving s Drainage 8. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. ti s. The following ordinance was considered: I NO. 87-115 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OA IMPR0%EMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS j THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance, On roll vote, ncAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye," r r Gorton "aye,' Ayer 'aye," Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens aye. Motion carried unanimously, B. The Council Considered adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and the State of Texas for installation of a traffic signal controller at the Interstate aiyhway 35 frontage road intersection witn United States Highway 3bU, , The following ordinance was considered: yi 4 ~ NO. 87-116 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR INSTALLATION OF A s TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER AT THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35 k FRONTAGE ROAD INTERSECTION WITH UNITED STATES HIGHWAY 38U; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that this agreement would allow installation of a signal at Hwy. 380 and 13 t 5 Normally the Highway Depa rcment would install the signal and ~ the City would have no control over what kind of controller was kk installed, With the contract, the City would be able to I control what kind of controller was used. The City would install the signal and the State would reimbuc3e the City for the expense involved. McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll rote," McAdams 'aye,' Alexander "aye,' Hopkina 'ayes' Gorton aye, Ayer "aye,' Boyd 'ayes' and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried unanimously, r City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 8 i 9. Resolptions A. ' The Council considered approval of a resolution closing Wye Street from the intersection of Wye and Mill Street to the intersection of Wye and Cross Timber on July 17, 1987 from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m, for the purpose of having a street fair. The following resolution was considered: j RESOLUTION NO. R87-U4U { A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING WYE STREET UN JULY 17, 1987: AND DECLARING AN AFFECTIVE DATE. Jean 7unringham, Fred Douglas-Fred Moore Reunion Committee, stated that this would be a school reunion for the entire s former faculty and student body, On July 17, there would be family activities which would include a street fair to sell souvenir iteos. Boyd motion, McAdams motion to approve the resolution. On roll rr vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Gorton -a a;j "aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' ; 'Fxl Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council CollSidered d pYruval ut a resolution appointing members to the Board of Directors of the Denton Retirement and Nursing Center Finance Authority. r r' : s f The following resolution was considered: RESOLUTION NO. R87-1141 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DENTON RETIREMENT AND NURSING CENTER FINANCE AUTHORITY: AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Mayor Stephens stated that Lloyd Harrell, Rick Svehla and John McGrane would be appointed members of the Board of Directors. ; PoM+` Hopkins motion, Alexander second to approve the resolution, on roil vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," 14 w Dorton "aye,' Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens aye, Motion carried unanimously. 1~bf ' Y' kl~ ~ ~ l Jf The Council returned to Item 6.A.1, 6. Ordinances fi=. 1 G t, `r City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 9 A, carol Roberts stated that the Girl Scout Council would trust in the judgment of the City Council along with directions from the Council to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and would like the Council to approve the ordinance with the amendment as stated. 1, The Council considered adoption of ordinance approving a specific use permit on a 5.4 acre tract located at 4000 West University Drive, The following ordinance was considered: ` NO. 87-113 r j AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A GIRL E SCOUT COUNCIL OFFICE/HEADQUARTERS AND f ACTIVITY/TRAINING CENTER, AS SAID PERMIT APPLIES TO 5.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 4000 WEST UNIVERSITY 1 DRIVE (U,S. HIGHWAY 38U)t PROVIDING FUR A PENALTY IN 1 z } THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $l,000.UU FUR VIOLATIONS ` THEREOF; A14D PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. r Boyd anotion, McAdams seconu to adopt the ordinance. on toll vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye," Hopkins 'aye," Gorton { "aye," Ayer "aye," duyd "aye,' and mayor Stepnens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. j Alexander motion, Hopkins second to instruct statf to receive an application for an amendment relative to outdoor campiny from the Girl Scout Council relative to the Specific Use Permit a in question without any further reference to fees or cost i involved in that process, Un roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Gorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye.' Motion carried unanimously. The Council returned to the regular agenda order. r -a 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: E A. A reminder that the formal dedication for Lake r' Ray Roberts was scheduled for June 30, 1987 at 11:00 a.m. Arrangements were made for vans to be available to transport Council Members and Public Utility Board Members. h ~ t, 4 B. Commission Ruth Tansey had participated in the s4 The Count EPA Committee. establishment of a Collin Denton y first meeting was for Tuesday evening at 5:UU p.m. Tansey asked for a staff member to serve on the Committee as well as a City Council member. 1, L k 1` ; r r 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 10 C. k reminder that the DISD/City Council luncheon was set for July 7, 1987 at the Redbud Room at TWU at noon, D. A reminder that the NTSU/City Council luncheon was set for July 1, 1987. NTSU would be supplying all the details in the near future. 11. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items of legal matters, real estate, personnel or board appointment. 12. New Business i The following items of New Business were su yyested by Council Members for future agendas: A. Council Member Uorton asked that the Legal Department prepare a resolution in support of the Psass9e o the hospital district, R he also suggested hosting a public forum to give information to the public regarding the hospital r district. Consensus was to proceed as suggested, B. Council Member Boyd suggested a reexamination of the use of City parks specifically whether police protection was being enforced as was indicated. r 13. The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board } appointments. The following action was taken: A. Gorton motion, hopkins second to approve the following Board and Commission appointments. Motion carried unanimously. AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD David Arno 1986-68 John R, Carrell 1986-bB Don Williams 1986-88 Rick Woolfolk 1987-89 Dante Ferrara 1987-89 a. non Smith 1986-88 Gene Wright 1987-89 y; 7 f ~ x ~ i J City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 11 i +I BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ' Clovis Morrisson, Jr, 1987-89 Frances LaFOCte 1986-8b Merlin Lee 1987-89 I Janeda Yeploe 1987-69 Ralph Morrison 1987-88 Harold Harkins (ALT) 1987-88 Deborah Darley (ALT) 1987-89 BULLDING CODE BOARD Robert orn 1986-b,~ Mike Lewis 1986-8b Edgar Barnes 1987-99 ti Robert Courtney 1987-69 Alfred 'Bud% Green 1986-88 Cliff Reding (ALT) 1987-89 Ed Stout (ALT) 1986-88 I CABLE TV ADVISORY BOARD Joseph Fearing 19bb-89 a Charlie McNeill 1966-89 Judith Abbott 19115-b8 G. L. Seligmann 1986-69 yr _ Darlene whitterr, i9b7-9U r y ik CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPUAT CummISSIUN °o Wayne Autrey 1986-88 Gilbert Bernsr.Ein 1966-bb Bruce Chamberlain 1987-89 Doug Chadwick 1987-b9 ~Vivian Edwards 1987-89 Mike Amador 1986_88 Virginia Gallian 1987-89 c• Gene Gohlke 1986-88 John Tompkins 1967-89 COMMUNITY DEVELOPFIEN'' BLOCK GRANT COMMITTEE r' . Connie Aguilar 1987-88 ,t Don Chipman 1986-88 Sarah Parker 1987-89 i Sibyl Evans 1986-88 i Rosemary Rodriguez 1986-88 14 a, Jo Luker 1986-66 Dennis Stephens 1967-89 Lucy Campbell 1987-89 Connie Wells 1987-89 At r ~f wa'. 'i R. a City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 12 i DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD - %-a-r es R ens 190- 9 Dale Maddry 1986-88 Ronald G. McDade 1986-88 Jim KuykendLll 1987-0 Cengiz Capan 1987-88 ELECTRICAL CODE BOARD Pete C um ey 1987-89 Davie Hoenig 1987-89 Jim geffer 1987-b9 Jane McBride 198b-bb Brad Carrell 1986-88 1r Marion Johnson (ALT) 1987-69 Clyde McWilliams (ALT) 1986-b8 a HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMiSSIUN Richard Hayes 1986-bb ' ' Mike Cochran 1987-89 ,3 5 Catherine Conrady 1987-b9 "r x Janet Shelton 1987-89 Bullitt Lowry 198b-bb W.A. Barker 1987-0 ;kSandra Matthews 1987-89 •g. Tom Miller 19bb-bb + Gaylen hickey 1987-b9 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTSE 4A Linda Brock 198b-88 Barbara Atkins 1987-49 Gary Truitt 1987-b9 Trudy FOFt@C 1986-bb Dorotho; vamico 1988-88 {1 Hector Medina 19bb-bb Anita. Cowan 1987-b9 Richard Enos 1987-89 3rane Price 1987-89 Myra Ctownover 1986-86 p•r f Rudy Rodriguez 1986-8b ' LIBRARY BOARD ''f » d y David Speck 1986-8b I! Lupo Gonzalez 1987-89 Rodney J. Hutton 1986-8b Mary Jo Pickens 1981-89 Ftargaret Chrisman 198b-88 Dorothy Atkins 1987-89 Jean Glasgow 1987-89 ya i i 1 ! R City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 13 PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD Dalton Gregory. 1987-b9 Gary Kirchoff 1986-88 Carl Anderson 1987-b9 Rita Pilkey 1987-b9 Catherine Bell 198b-88 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Bill Claiborne 1986-88 Ruby Cole 1986-88 Etha Kiker 1987-89 William Kamman 1986-bb Euline Brock 1987-89 Ivan Glasscock 1987-89 Jildd Holt 1987-89 PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CODE BOARD George Becker 1987-89 Richard Cooper 1987-88 e { k Bob Sullivan 1987-89 Jeffrey Johnson 1987-bb a` u' {4 ,3I Pete Work 1986-88 Bill Burley 1987-69 Joe Mulroy 1987-b9 " PUBLIC UTILITIES HOARD ul Mark Chew ' 1987-91 Robert LaPorte 1987-91 Kenneth Frady 19b5-8b Roland Laney 1986-9U John Thompson 1985-b9 TrMPJ► 9UMD OF DIRECTORS - DENTON REYRESEN'rAT'VE8 Ray Stephens 1987-b9 Roland Vela 1986-88 tl h CIVIL SERVICL+ COMMISSION erre uil - 1986-89 E' Robert Caldwell 1985-88 Jack Miller 1985-88 It t.re ' ~ tr 5 e , V. i City of Denton City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 19 B• 9oyd motionr Ayer second to app Denton Council representative to the Metroplexy Mayoras Association Committee on the Future. Motion unanimnusly• carried With nO further business, the meeting was adjourned. r i RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r, h r r { ! ~ 'r JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTONj TEXAS xp +rr „u'r 6 S ` F U643e ' ti ~r y~i lY n p 6' f Jl Y+ i n . l 01 Y ~ I ^ f , A'>rr r r +t ^ r Y dr9>r. r', li r's, r};~ r y e r8,, wry ~ , 1 ( f + .r a ' E^,~ r rf.1 l r r c• e'. y i rr I 4 City council minutes June 30, 1987 The council convened into the special called meeting at 10:00 a.m. in she Clty Manager's Conference Room. } PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tam McAdams; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton, and Hopkins, ABSENT: None 1, The Council considered approval of a resolution closing a portion of Bonnie Brae Street from Airport Road to Hillowwood Street on July 4, 1987 from 6:30 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. Closing of these portions of the above mentioned street would allow for the Fourth of July fireworks show sponsored by the Denton Kiwanis club. The following resolution was considered: 1 RESOLUTION NO. R87-041A A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING BONNIE BRAE STREET ON r JULY 4, 1987: AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Consensus of the Council was to direct the City Manager to make st, sure area residents would be allowed access to their homes even after the barricades were in place for the fireworks show. Gorton motion, Boyd second to approve the resolution. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,° Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unan.'mously. 2. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, asked staff to present the following items: A. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, informed Council ' that the open meeting act did not allow discussions among Council members regarding City b,:siness if they were not in open session. Staff could %hare information with the Council and Council Members could a,k staff questions, but the Council could not discuss items among themselves unlesu in open session. { B. Jeff Meyer, Executive Diractor of Planning, !;,formed the Council that the County CorAosionere had sent a letter to the Texas Air Quality Board asking for a regional ; plan. It was expected that it would be rejected. F . v ,t v- r . ,w lj .1 4 I y i City of Denton City Council Minutes June 30, 1987 Page 2 i C. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, updated the Council on th$ YMCA pool project. He stated that the YMCA had agreed to a three-way agreement before a certificate of occupancy could be issued for the pool. That agreement bound k the YMCA to finish widening Riney Road before the pool could open. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. I F r .5 1 1 is RAY STEPhENS, MAYOR ` h CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r p lr. ` JENNIFER WALV,'R9, CITY SPrUNTARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS e / ~ ♦ 5 ♦ f Ak 1~' 1' J rl , . ♦ t pf ` rt Y 0 ~ * 1 ' • c v°~ w I; y I;a f 1 r y+ •d 0~ s + ` 2480g is ^ •;.~;U.'~!'Y+~rsYtlv,rw..r...,,.:..,_. _ .,..,,sa,a+lwlYaaa... ........w.,.... ,..o.,..... t American Cancer Swaety DENTON UNIT Tom Joel In Jul. 2 3 P87 I 1 ` July 2391987 ullr in t S City Secretary City of Denton 215 F. McNinrey Denton, Texas 76201 ~s Dear City Secretaryt r ly Thu Denton Urit of the American Cancer Society seeks perurission to solicit ttnda at the intersection of University Drive and k p`~'''=u Carroll Boulevard from 9100 to 2100 on Saturday, August 159 1987. The funds will be collected by volunteer youth from the Denton ! a, Cn1+-.:'y 4-H clu'os. They will be easily identified by motorist♦ as representing the Society and 4-H club. The Society understands y that no solicitors will enter upon the right-of-way nor will ~k "pressure" be applied to pctential donors. r Thank you for your consideration. r` [ 1 SS 1:t 'i,y'i Sincerely, .r~ X t 1 ' "I S'• Tharn R. Jos 1 i n, x pre dent Denton Unit r v µ,j7 rr Yr., +1y IV, tr" v ~ f , ~t Nnuto 2, Box E26 • Denton, Texas 76201 • 147/317.7018 yr 1 1~~.yRi~A{.11Fvlyf?C'4~!rfYWWlkNMdXwF}~•~•... .•rr.Maq,~,~,,.:v~4.,~~y;ti~lnwv..,..-,-w=.r,.aa.r ,~}. IAW YY SrIr:a,.eA:.~unPw.w w.rw.~awwq"#RL~: r r a,,^i 4 i' + It . IP i w k i IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DENTON CITY ORDINANCE FOR QUIET HOURS AFTER 10100 PK, WE THE NEIGHBORS OF THE 2000 BLOCK OF WEST OAK STREET AND SURROUNDING AREA, AGREE ON SATURnAV AUGUST 115t.h, THE DENTON KAPPA SIGrA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION KAY HOLD A BAR-8- QUE AND HAVE LIVE I'USIC UNTIL 11100PN, ON THE LAWN OF 2026 WEST A.' OAK STREET. THIS FUNCTION SERVES AS AN ANNUAL ALUM REUNION AND FUND RAISER FOR THE SCHOLARSHIPS OF KAPPA S1GKA UNDERGRADUATES. ADDRESS SIGNATURE . : r 10 C'' '4 2o2t td~ Q~ prx ~ ~ ,//60l1 4al- 1'F ~ 1 [~{f~ ~ /~I/.'`/i({(/ J ~l .Y I V[/ I V 1'x(1 z v K 4e/ p03 9 2-011 o~tl u~ 1 a4j 1 J ,a v 1 e .1 4 t 'y r i~~'' - ....cam.«;R,f+u.a,;.<w'4'..i•r. .alru.n v .:.,..;.a .....«...ro+*J.^.at "'.+Ky.!~;°.'M t w•.w:nwr+..s«r+W%+W.+:+M+?kr.y.4A«tiraSP.'r•'••', } h^: -o DATE: 08/04/87 CITY COUNCIL RRPORT FORMAT i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Cc'troil FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager j SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF 73.394 ACRES Oe LAND BEING PART OF THE M. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417. (A-43) 1 r e 1 • 1 The Plannirg and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation on August 12, 1987. BUMWY: This is the second public hearing. The annexation of this ptoperty will enable Miller of Texas, Inc. to include the property in their i coning proposal. In the City's opinion it will assist in establish-, ing more uniform city limits and correct city limit areas where property was omitted Tram previous annexations. 1;ACKGROUND: r , Property has been annexed since 1984 in this area in conjunction I with several coning requests. FROG 4. DEPARTMENTS _OAQROUPS AFFBCTED: Planning and Development Department, departments providing City services FISCAL IMPACT: No analysis has been done with regard to the annexation at this time. City services will be provided to the area. Resp fully submitted: ar r1 Prepared byt Ci y Manager . i Cecile C%rson lirbon Plannsr Ap roved f, f David Ellison bra Acting Director for Planning and Development 19410/1 11 t ~ c :F I Z 1847L I t j NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION r i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described In Exhibit 'W'- attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, to t:.. corporate limits of the i City of Denton. ; A Public Hearing will be held by and before the it Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the :~i/s7r day ofd 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C y ouncil C m s o the i Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the &Love proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be a f heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested ' in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Co wail of the City of Denton, Texas, on the lj~L day of 19870 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ty Council Cam •ers o tho Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons .i Interested lit the above proposed annexation. At said time and I lace all such p persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. { { Y ,n { ATTEST: NIFER j 4 A-43 a. 4 A-43 ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the M. Forrest A rvey, Abst. No. 417, Denton County, Texas, and more pIrt(cularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point being the southeast corner of the tract described In Ordinance 85-210, Tract 4-9 said point also lying in the east boundary line of lot 6, 9100 B of the subdivision of said survey, some being the west bounu4ry line of lot 1, Block E of said subdivision, told point also lying in the north right-of-way line of an east-west public road known as Blagg Rd.1 j THENCE south 30 10' 111 east along the east boundary Ifni of tot 6, Block B, crossing said Blagg Rd. a distance of 47.63 feet to a point lying fn the south right of way line of said Blagg Rd., some being the ~ northeast corner of a 71.182 acre tract described in a deed to i ,rray W. McNett and wife, Irene McNett recorded in Vol. 436, Pg. 221 of the D.R.D.C.T.: I THENCE south 20 66' 35' west along the east boundary line of said McNett tract same being the east boundary line of L)t 6, Block B. passing at 2236.16 feet, more or less, the southeast comer of sold McNett tr,xt, same befog the southeast corner of said lot 6, Block B, same being the northeast corner of a j tract described In a deed to Gary Miller, Trustee, recorded fn Vol. 1677, Pg 562 of the D.R.D.C.T., and continuing for a total distance of 2266.16 feet to a point for corner lying in the existing city limits as j established by the tract described in Ordinance No. 84-98; F THENCE north 850 09' 17" west along sold present city limits, some being the south boundary line of said tot 6, crossing in east-wort public road known as Trinity road, and continuing far a total distance of 1384.74 feet to the southwest corner of the McNett tract, same being the southwest corner of sold tot 6, said point also being an inner all corner of said Martin tract; THENCE north 020 49' 296 east along the present city limits, same being the west boundary line of said McNett tract and tot 6, same befog the ea:' boundary line of said Miller tract, rlssing at 2247.94 feet, more or less, the north boundary line of said McNett tract same being the south right of way line of said i,. Stagg Rd., and continuing for a total distance of 2195.27 feet to a point for corner lying in the north right of way line of blagg Rd., same being the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 65-210, f Tract 4-81 THENCE south ASO 54' 3S' east along the north right of way line of said Blagg Rd. and sold present city i limits a distance of 1383.92 feet to the place of Beginning and containing 73.334 acres of land. I y: r 4 -t PLAN 0^ SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shoum on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED HY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITV I( OF DENTON, TEXAS: ` % Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 070a as ariended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: i T I. Basic Service Plan A. Police .f (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other {1^~,, routine Iolice services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; v (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed `r as the need therefore is established by appropriate ! study and traffic standards. Fire r t D. (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided s on the effective date of annexation. C. Water ,.t Ol (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city i, lines on the effective date of annexation, and t thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. w E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- 7 vided within the city will be extended to the . annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. ~ R4 v E I 1 , Service plan Annexed Areas page two F. Streets - o: streets (repair of f hazardous r (1) .Iaergency maintenance measures nece_sarY for traffic low, etc.) chuckholes, { will begin on the effective date of annexation. annexeds t } (Z) Routine maintenanceoeginhin same ent city, will area on theseffective date of annexation. j of streets, installa- (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing construction of tion of storm drainage facilities, the governing curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, ermied as thewi)ldbeha eforeishedeundernthebestablished body, policies of the city. ~ T G, Inspection Services the city rovided by } (1) Any inspection services nnow P umbing, (building, gas, housing, electrinal, p begin in the annexation area etc • sanitation, w.ll on the effective date of annexation. Y a x, and Zoning 'rt H. planning ( The Planning and Zoning JuriO iction of the city the effective y 1) will extend to the anCi~ydplanning wil: thereafter date of annexation. encompass the annexed area. I, Street Lighting r will be installed in the substan- (1) Street lighting tially developoldcr eaofitheccityance with the established p +r J, Reern%tion use all existing (1) Residents of the annexed aarksmaetc.,ston the effee- recreational facilities, PThe same andards and tive date of annexation. resent city will be tol- policies now used i~hehrecreations, program and lowed in expanding facilities in the enlarged city. Electric Distribution of Denton for The city recommends the use o: City r, electric power. ! 1 R Seivice Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous Street name signs where needeI will be installed within approximKtely 6 months after the e.fective date of annexation, j II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guid4- lines as: I , (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based pa^tly on density of population, magnitude of problo.a; compared to other areas, established r r technical stantOrds and professioral studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. a (2) Impact on the balanced 6.!owth policy or the city, ' k rg (3) Impact on overall city economics. v The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the I upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same s' ti established criteria as all other areas of the city. 1lI t P, b r k 1 J t ti ' ~ t I 1p (y '~14Ml wrtw...- ,.r 1:...M'40'Y .•IF o. .,i',.,o . v:Maa•3l'1v..,.... . ANIYYj li it I 1 f1 , r /i~ ,'1S~a•r> ~~••f!S fst•'. _~•^i~ VV~B ~•r~•1"wR~~•~~~•~~•r•~~•~w~a~~ ~UMIvensi Y - e~•s: IN«1 ~ ; ' r•` j~ ~ ~•f r •43 ~ i to • ) ; I a ti.,r~R R R i ' A-44 •44 z i '+i mar/ .t.,~ ei•r~ ~ r ' r i , t •r •5 1. +is- ilat'; I d/ vd i r , I I,~` a/.N ~ • . k . v,. . f • • ..f n. R~ u4.rYlJF4ilZ i ANNEXATION iCHEDULE A-43 I July 07, 1987 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearings I July lU, 1987 Notice Published in Denton Record Chronicle for first public hearing v July 21, 1987 City Council - first public hearing v July 249 1987 Notice published in Denton Record ; Chronicle for second public hearing August 04, 1987 City Council - second public.hearing " August 12, 1987 Planning and Zoning Commission makes recommendation August 25, 1987 City Council institutes annexation k 11, 1 August 300 1987 Publication of ordinance in Denton J( Record Chronicle October 06, 1987 final action by City Council r• { r Ix 1 + t 5 ►!Gt•Yw.i.ay,.br s f i , DATE: 08/04/87 t CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT t l T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council { FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager .822 SUBJECT BHOLD PUBLIC RINGAPART OF THERM. FORRESTOSURYZT , ABSTRACT NO.2417. ACRES OF LAND pR,~QR%RDATION: ' i The Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation on August 12, 1987. " 4 suMMARY ~ ' This is the second public hearing. The annexation of this property will enable Miller of Texas, Inc. to include the property in their toning proposal. In the City's opinion it will assist in establish- city limits and correct city limit areas where property was omitted from previous annexations. a BACKGROUND- Property has been annexed since 1984 in this area in conjunction with several zoning requests. r A,:. ,1 ..e nye~AR7d2NT4 OA CROUPS AFFECTED: Sn 1 k Planning and Development Department, departments providing City services 19CAL INP ►C : ~ No analysis has been done with regard to the annexation at this time. Respect lly Submitted: r M *tn,,0,, r• Prepared bys ,I Cecile Carson Urban Piaimer k Approved: ~ David Billion Acting Director for Planning and Development ` 1941e/9 ,I 1849L yE i j I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS fN PROPOSED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: i { The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute anr.axation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of saie, City to add the { territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and Incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. p a. Public Hearing will be held by and before the Ci y Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the ~s~- dey of , 19879 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti y Council Cha o the Muniipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and thins all g , persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the 4AO- day of 19871 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ti y council C ambers o t e Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons a interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and lace all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested In the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. lh~tv~ 04-1 RAT 0 JAYOR F f , 1 t I ATTEST: ,j I lw A R+~ , I 1 A-44 i A-44 All Pat Certain lot, tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated in the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, Denton County, Texas, and being mor, particularly described as follows: i BEGINNING at a polot in the present city limits, said point being the northernmost southeast corner of the tract described in Ordinance C4-98, said point also lying in the southernmost north boundary line of a tract of land 6scrfbed in Ordinance No. 87-050 ( Correction Ordinance of Ordinance 85-210, Tr. 11); THENCE north 20 34' 03" east (north 40 58' east, by Ordinance No. 84.98) along the easternmost present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 84-98, same being the east boundary line of lot 5, Block E of the M. Forrest Subdivision, the west boundary line of tot 6, Block E, passing at 678.77 feet the southwest corner of a 1.793 acre tract of land described in a deed to Tao Prouty, Trustee recorded In Vol. 1755, Pg. 495 of the D.R.D.C.T, and continuing a total distance of 1321.77 feet to the northwest corner of said 1.793 acres Prouty tract same being a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers monument Q-313N, for corner; THENCE south 230 25' 50" east along the northeast boundary line of said 1.793 acre Prouty tract, same being the southwest boundary line of a tract of land described in a deed to the City of Dallas, recorded in Vol. 195, Pg 573 of the D.R.D.C.T, a distance of 490.89 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers monument Q-312N, for corner; THENCE south 340 06' 54" west along the southeast boundary line of said 1.793 acre Prouty tract, same being the northwest boundary line of said City of Dallas tract, passing at 232.82 feet the southeast corner of said 1.793 acre Prouty tract, continuing for a total distance of 269.96 feet to a U.S. Army Carps of Engineers monument Q-311H, for corner; ` THENCE south 330 O1' 161 east along the northeast boundary line M a 0.544 acre tract of land described in a deed to Tom Prouty, Trustee, recorded in Vol. 1770, Pg. 404 of the a.R.D.C.T, same being the southwest boundary line of said City of Dallas tract a distance of 281.65 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers monument Q-31011, for corner; THENCE south 000 35' 73" west along the easternmost boundary line of said 0.544 acre Prouty tract a distance of 12.77 feet to the southeast corner of said tract, some being a northeast corner of the present city limit as established by the tract described in Ordinance No. 87-050 I Correction Ordinance of } Crdinance 65-210, Tr. 11) for corner; i THENCE north 870 21' 18" west along the south boor-ey line of said 0.544 acre Prouty tract, same being said present city limits, a distance of 181.91 feet to the southwest corner of sold 0.544 acre Prouty tract, same being on inner ell corner of the tract described in Ordinance 87-050 (Correction Ordinance of Ordinance No. 85-210, Tract Ill for corner; THENCE north 050 23' 06" east along the west boundary line of said 0,544 acre Prouty tract, same being said present city lfo!ts, passing at 242.28 feet the northwest corner of sold 0.544 acre Prouty tract, and Continuing for a total distance of 247.94 feet to the northernmost northeast corner of the tract described to Ordinance No. 87-050 1 Correction Ordinance of Ordlnance 65-210, Tr. 11) for corner; ! THENCE north Boo 43' 60" west along the northern most boundary line of said present city limits, a distance of 40.24 feet to the northwest corner of the tract described in Ordinance No, 87.050 (Correction Ordinance of Ordinance No. 65-210, Tract If) for corner; ; THENCE south 20 45' 31, west along sold present city limits a distance of 264.28 feet to a point for a i Corner in the north boundary line of a tract described in a deed to Tom Prouty, trustee, recorded in Vol. ` 1798, Pg. 216 of the D.A.D.C.T.1 .a THENCE south 10 31' 28" west along said present city limits a distinct of $8.50 feet to a point for corner in the south boundary line of sold rrouty tract; ,4. THENCE south 20 06' 211 west along the west boundary line of the present city limits a distance of { 335,65 feet to a point for corner same being an inner corner of the tract described in Ordinance No. 87-050 1 Correction Ordinance of Ordinance No. 85-210, Tract 11) for corner] THENCE north 870 35' 641 west along the said present city limits, time being the easternmost southeast Cornar of sold FMK tract, a distance of 31,21 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 2.622 acres of land, i , { PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970& as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: I, Basic Service Plan ' A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, 6 ` and other traffic control devices will be installed f as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. a B. Fire da. (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- a meat of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. riA, C. Stater t v (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4,09. of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. X?v -J D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to server lines in accordance with article •4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. L. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation, I Service Plan { Annexed Areas Page two + F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation, (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. f (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. 0. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city + (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, i!u sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city ` will extend to the annexed area on Vie effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area. I• Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed is the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the 4 established policies of the city. J, Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing «',a recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used ir. the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city, K. Electric Distribution i (1) The city recommends the use if City of Denton for electric power. M.w V4 1 ~5 1 ~ f1 yet ! 1 Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three 'I L, Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of tie City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established ii technical standards and professional studies, and V~ natural or technical restraints or opportunities, i (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city, (3) Impact on overall city economics, d The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city, err ~ 1 , 1. a+ ~ ~ , e i « `t r:c t ~ t r rz , i ,~M.M.fIYw[+'w.. o-,..w...q-. .ev .w a z,.,.. _ _,..s ' 7 r / • 11 1 I .trill UNWgR RS ITY , east l~N.~,' . wtoo j .a3 A•aay { I 1 •44 A -4 io F \~1If' es•fe yw r,~•b rJ • r . ' dJyf l ~ r di•1io I ANNEXATION SCHEDULE A-44 i i July 07, 1987 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearings July 10, 1987 Notice published in Denton Record Chronicle for first public hearing " July 21, 1987 City Council - first public hearing July 24, 1987 Notice published In Denton Record . Chronicle for second public hearing August 04, 1987 City Council -,second public hearing . August 12, 1987 Planning and Zoning Commission makes recommendation August 25, 1987 'j City Council institutes annexation August 3o, 198? Publication of ordinance in Denton Record Chronicle s October 06, 1987 Final action by City Council , tom. A q, SS t DATE: 08/04/87 t .e~ ~ CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 6 , C , S t TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i # FROM; Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager 1 SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ANHBKATION OF 1.834 ACRES OF LAND BEING PART OF THE G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330. (A-45) RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation on August 12, 1987. SUMMARY: This is the second publichearing. The annexation of this property will enable Miller of Texas, Inc. to include the property in their zoning proposal. In the City's opinion it will assist in establish- ing more uniform city limits and correct city limit areas where property was omitted from previous annexations. BACKGROUND: Property has been annexed since 1984 in this area in conjunction 4 with several toning requests. i PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Planning and Development Department, departments providing City services j r y:'~ FISCAL IMPACTt this time. No analysis has been done with regard to tVH Res Llo4 Prepared Jby:~g City Manager Cecile Carson Urban Planner Approvedt David Ellison Acting Director for Planning I and Development J~ , . ~ 19~1s/2 yylMlWZ..v Wan,...... Y Z J 1850L NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the C ty Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the .0` day of , 19870 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City Council C s o the Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above, proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice, A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City C uncil of the City of Denton, Texas, on the yam` day of , 19871 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C ty Council Chambers of the Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear anu be heard. Uf all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. 1 AXY ST , MAYOR F c i ATTEST! i -41 EJENNIFER TER , CITY RECEWTARY A-45 v I i 1 A-45 i ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land, lying and being situated in the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, Denton county, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point being the northernmost northwest Inner ell corner of the tract described In Ordinance No. 86-130, said point also being the southwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to PA Land Co., Ltd., recorded in Vol. 7851, Pg. 928 of the D.R.O.C.T., said point also lying IF the north boundary line of a tract of land described in a deed to David D. Vaughn recorded in Vol. 985, Pg. 827 of the O.R.D.C.T.; k THENCE north 870 48' 39" west along north boundary line of said Vaughn tract, a distance of 60.0 feet to a point for corner; THENCE northeasterly the following three (3) courses and distances 60.0 feet west of and parallel to the west boundary line of said PA tract, same being sold present city 1(m(ts; (1) north 020 02' 02" east a distance of 83.39 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 11.)0.0 feet, a central angle of 220 DO' 00' and a chord bearing and length of north 130 02' 02' east, 572.43 feet; (2) northeasterly along said curve to the right an arc distance of 575.96 feet; 13) north 240 02' 02" east, 696.01 feet to a paint for corner in the south boundary line of a tract of land described in a deed to the City of Dallas by a deed recorded in Vol. 212, Pg. 501 of the D.R.D.C.T.; J THENCE north 820 62' 52' east along south boundary line of said City of Dallas tract, a distance of 0.98 fl feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 660 04' 16' east along the south boundary line of said City of Dallas tract, a distance of $9.20 feet to a point for corner, said point being the northwest corner of said AMB tract; j THENCE southwesterly the following three (3) courses and distances along said present city limits, same being the west boundary line of said RMB tract; (1) south 240 02' 02" west, 698.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, hav(ng a radius of 1440.0 feet, a central angle of 220 00' 001, and a chord bearing and length of sou N, 130 02' 02" west, 549.63 feet; (21 southwesterly along said curve to the r left in arc distance of 552.92 feet; (3) south 020 02' 02' west, 8335 feet to the Place of Beginnlrlg and containing 1.834 acres of land. d., I y M1 ~ Y IaJ fr ' i i .y i IJ 1 . 1 ale aY ` PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation. NOW, THEREF)RE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section . Pursuant to the amerced, Texas Code Annotated, there isrhereby adopted tforethe 0p as annexation area the following plan of service: P Proposed I, Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to tails, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, ° and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards, x B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- went of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. ; C. Water i (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be prcvidcd at city rates, from existing city linep on the effective date of annexation, and theteafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D, Sewer t, (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer linen in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas. i E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be axtended to the o, annexed area within one month after the effective d Ate of annexation. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, anu other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. Q, Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city ' (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation etc.) will . ) 1 begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation, ir( H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend :o the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area, I, Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, r. r J, Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive dato of annexation, Thu same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. K. Electric Distribution j (1) The city recommenAs the use of City of Denton for electric power. Service Plan 'Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. Ii. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics. i , The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the -.j annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established critbria as all other areas of the city. ,r r. r ~ a r 1 r;zy ~ N a iF' r rT i I' l• rI • t~ v it n~ ' ^ y n .~Y°r 457 936 k 'UNIVERSITY ea 1j ~ara.~ I..M •43 j •ti~.. ' A•44 y -44 a .ill 6. M • ~ ' J , ' jb \ t As•i s1 ~ ~\\\\\\YYY- ~ . r ,,,G,• ~ ds •ero 1 , 110 '}a i 1 dl tie . aN l p \ l• , nar a I \ A46 00 ea pays i L dl,r~~rJ I 4_ ANNEXA7lUN SCHEDULE A-45 v' July 07, 1987 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearings V- July 10, 1987 Notice published in Denton Record Chronicle for first public hearing ' ti July 21, 1987 City Council - first public hearing i July 24, 1987 Notice published in Denton Record Chronicle for second public hearing August 04, 1987 City Council - second public hearing August 12, 1987 Planning and Zoning Commission makes recommendation August 25, 1987 City Council institutes annexation I August-30, 1987 Publication of ordinance in Denton Record Chronicle October 06, 1987 Final action by City Council I i x E n a r f ~ r,w i it 0923E 1A t NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOk THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING I FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- ment , supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and i WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and j " WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriatioa of funds to be used for the purchase of the 'r ? materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW1 THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: k `1 SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered I bids or ma oriels, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in IIII a the "Bid pproved as being the lowest attached responsible bids for hereby accepted and : BID ITEM ti = NUMBER N0. VENDOR AMOUNT 9774 ALL BEN GRIFFIN TRACTORS 511.749.00 _ j 7 1 1 i SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered terns of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting approve an accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute i the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the Above ' numbere tems of the submitted bids the City Council hereby rA authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION Y. That this ordinance shall become effective + imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 4 day of AUGUST , 1987. a' V -TRYOR RAY STBPMTF, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 9. i ATTEST: a JENNIFER , Li mmmy j CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS t I! APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I J11 BY: I 1 PAGE TWO 4 w. DATE: August 4, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager i SUBJECT: BID! 9774 TRACTOR AND IMPLEMENTS i RECO12-ENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting j I specCficatlons ol Ben Griffin Tractors in the amount of $11,749.00 for the tractor and 4 implements. } i i r SUMMITRY: This bid is for the purchase of a tractor acid Implements for the A r- rport 1Aalntenance Program. ,I J Y, l~ V BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:- yl i` Motor Pool Fleet and Airport Operations FISCAL IMPACt: 1986187 Airport Bond Funds Account 401-002-AB87-8502 Respec Ily submitted: ,A 'J Llo Y. Harrell City hanager Itp * Pr red by: 1 ^r 1 ' Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. % Title,. Assistant Purchasing Agent r- Approved: " 4~ ie,. John J. Marshall, G.P.M. ft)Ai Purchasing Agent 1 d `I a i I! i I I I I I I DID 1 1 9774 ► 1 4 1 BEN I I t } 131 IITLE IRACTOR 1 IMPLEMENTS I I SEASONS I BRIFFIN I 3 I OPENED !0.Y 20, 1981 2111 P.M. 1 1 MACHINERY I IRACIOR I I I ACCOUNiI 411-112-AB87-8512 I I 1 I CO. I I I I I SUPPLY I I I I 1- •I I _1.•..----....I -I I ITEM DESCRIPIION 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I . .L 1.......--- -I- -L _.........1- _1 I ( t i I I I I t I. I 1 I TRACTOR 1 i 61574.111 71122.111 1 I !`1 I I f I I I 2. 1 1 1 fRONI END LOADER I 1 11668.11 1 21198.11 1 1 i J I i 1 I 1 3 ,1 I 101 SCRAPER 1 1 413.11 1 319.11 1 1 I 1:. I I ! t i I. I I I REAR KADE 1 1 367.11 1 534.11 i 1 i 1 1 t 1 I I 1 1 5. I E I IRUSH NMI RDIARY 1 1 11342.11 1 599.11 1 1 I 1. I' 1 1 PINISNINI 114NER I I 11415.N I 977.11 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I t I. 1 t I I I I i I NOHL 1 t DEERE 1151 1 FORD 1911 1 1 i t 'i ! I i I I 1 ► 11 I IELiVERY 1 1 7 DAYS 1 11 DAYS I I 1 I I 1 I I I I , 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 t I I i t z } {.w{u+. _.•a~..r a.. r.. ~..r....wl.•ranNlM. q^s . ...°srt!,. .....r n......Mrv.M.JU{~.,FJW4YJ.µlYJ4M9M'YhPILL.MMMh.NIfMMnaxn•..vMMYML~/VyVH£'•.r 4 1 a • , µ 1 U`JLSL NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN i EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the 1 lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works ov improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: a SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the j construe public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the S lowest responsible bids: 4 BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 9760 HASTY FOWLER CONSTRUCTION CO. 587.404.00 9764 CALVERT PAVING CO. 123.673.00 a7 a. t s9 r ~ i it i SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bi3s shall not constitute a contract between the j City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such E public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. E SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to i execute a necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Not!.ce to Bidders and Bid Proposals and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conJitions, plans and specifications, s k standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above compel t ve s and the execution of contract:, for the public ~ works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorised contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _4_ day of _ attctrc~, 1987• i a KAY or J MAYUK CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS C 4 Y ATTEST: rr CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 1 i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I BY: i PAGE TWO t i DATE: August 4, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT f TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager E ' SUBJECT: BID# 9760 BOLIVAR STREET 8" SANITARY SEWER LINE REWIVIENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Hasty Fowler Construcilnn Co. at $87,404.00. i i SUi?MRT: This bid Invitation eras sent to our vendor list for Water and Sanitary Sewer lines an received four blds. The/ ranged from a low of $87,404.00 to a high of $146,264.00. The low bid Is a very good bid and the Contractor Is now finishing the second award from the City of Denton. The Public Utility Advisory Boa-.d recommended the award at their July 22 meeting. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet ` PROGMMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: i This Is a Utility Capital Improvements Project. The street overlay will follow the Installation of this sanitary sewer tine. FISCAL IMPACT: - There Is no additional Impact on the General fund. i Respect lly submitted: C y y Lloy V. Harrell i City Hlanager Prepared by: ; ame. ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent ell Approved: M , 1. me John J. Marshall, C.P.M. ~~t~p; Purchasing Agent I s ~ 1 I I JID 1 1 9761 1 UTILITY I JAY-11AR I 6ICKERSON I HASTY I I DID TITLE BOLIVAR St B" S.S. I CONTRACTOAS t CORPORATION 'CONSIRUCTION I FOWLER I 1 OPEIIED JUNE 15, 1981 1114 P.N. I INC. 1 1 CO. INC. ICONSIRUCTION I I ACCOUNT$ I ! I I CD. I 1 I 1 I I I I 1------------- I-----........I............I------------- -------------i 4 I DTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR S ....I--- - ---1-°-• ....................I-----•-----..I.............I.............I---------....1.............1 ! I I i I I I 1 1 1 i I 1 i : L) 1 BOLIVAR STREET 11' 1 144,501.31 1 146,164.11 1 111,189.31 1 11,414.11 1 S +i I I SANITARY SEWER LINE I I I' I I i 4 I i i I I I J 3 I I i I i 1 i I I I I i I I 111 Bond I Yes I yes I Yes I Yes I I ~ I I 1 : I I 1 I 1 I I i I I _ I I I I I ; i t I I 1 ! t 1 i I I , I r I I i I 1 ' l I I I 1 '1 i I I I I I I 1 e.n..w w...u t r T DATE: August 4, 1987 t CITY COUNCIL REPORT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. llarrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID# 9764 PECAN CREEK DRAINAGE CHANNEL RECOlf. NDATION. We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder Calvert w ; Paving Co, of Denton for $123,675.00. _ SUMMARY: This bid is for the paving and rip rap of Pecan Creek Drainage r, Channel. It will improve drainage by allowing the channel not to collect trash and debris. this invitation was sent to some 20 or more prospective bidders. We received ^ five bids ranging from $123,675.00 to $173,385.00. y, ~ I BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet. k PROMMe DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: j This is part of the 1987 Bond Program. FISCAL IMPACT: Bond Fund #436-020-GO87-8107-9105. There is no additional g. g impact on the current General Fund. A ire a y4;, Respectfully submitted: r n Loyd Ilarrell r City ! eager yi by 2. ~i y Prepared by: me. John J. Marshall, C.P.M. 's Title: Purchasing Agent fw , Approved: S ` Na John J. Marshall, C.P.M. c , T1i11'; Purchasing Agent s ~ t I I ! I Bit 4. 1 9764 1 DICKERSON i NAL1 I J.E. I J-H I CALVERT I I k 119 TITLE PECAM CREEK DRAINAGE CH I I I I I I I OPENED JULY 14, 1967 2:11 P.O.ICONSIRUCTION I NILLIAMS I HAYNES !CONSTRUCTION I PAVING I I yi ACCOIIIITI #136-121-6087-8717-9115 1 I 1 I I I I . Co. .CORSTRUCTION I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - '°------°°-I---•---------I-------------'-- - ----------I { I I 111 1 iIEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR t .._..:..I---•---------------------I-------------I-------------l-------------I----...------l-------------I-------------I ; 1 I I I I I I I I 1. 1 IDRAINASE CHANNEL-LUMP SUM! 1681181.51 1 131,876.11 1 154,921.11 1 113,385.41 1 123,675.11 1 i s '.I t I ! I i I I k s E I I I I 1 I I I ; I I I t I I I s I I III BOND I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I I I I I I I I S 1 t f t 1 I t I t I I i I 1 1 41 NK DAY 1 1 1121M1 DEDIICII I I I I ! I I I FOR 71 ND I I 1 a j ; I I I I I ;I j I I i S I -r j I I i ! 1 t I 1 } I I I I 1 I I t : i }I L' 9yy d , I r } M i 0923L C NO. ORDER AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHp GE DENTON . AND _C~LYERF AND D R TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN AN EFFECTIVE DATE the City awarded a contract WHEREAS, on AUGUST 4 1987 PEC for the construct ono certa n mprovemePzoject;har~E1D 9764- AN s CREEK DRAINAGE CHANNEL WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended to the Council that a change order be authorized to amend such contract and said change order being in compliance with the requirements of art. 2368a, V.A.C.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: E SECTION I. That the change order to the contrain bete etween the amount C i t y -a" CALVERT PAVING CO. o f 22 153. r ti of ` is here approve an t e expend lure o un s t ere or is hereby authorized. SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective i mme and approval. t e y -W n on its passage Sr a PASSED 00 APPROVED this the 8 day of AUGUST 19$7. ~ t R(f x t r 1 7:d I ! i RAY STE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i i { ATTEST: f EN R WALTNERT,-UTT y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: . DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 5 ~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS . 'I BY: t, DATE: August 4, 1987 l CITY COUNCIL REPORT f TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager • CHANGE ORDER 1i BID# 9764 SUBJECT. PECAN CREEK DRAINAGE CHANNEL j RECOIZ1E1iDATi01i: We recommend a Change Order be approved reducing the amount of rip rap from 5,030 square yards to 3,995 square yards for the reduction of 1,055 square yards at $21.00 Per square yard for the total dollar amount of $22,155.00. This will reduce the amount of the contract from $123,675.00 to $101,526.00. j SUMMARY: This project estimate and allocation was not as much as the bid therefore we are not able to fund the total bid amount. We have therefore deducted only on the concrete rip-rap. This is with the knowledge and recommendation r t i from Jerry Clark, City Engineer. This bld was on the consent agenda approved earlier. F MCKGROUKO.* Tabulation Sheet r PR0MRS. DEPARVER?S OR GROUPS AFFECTED: k None F - y[ c~~q5 e t a Y;r 4' r, FISCAL IMPACT: None Resp tfully submitted: f U ' L yd V. Harrell City Manager ~ wrl. Prepared by., x t ~1c1s2'* 40 J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent ie: ? Approved: y Agn J. Marshall, C.P.M. ft18; pt chasing Agent .,r f • WORK DAYS 20 1987 CID DRAINAGE BID ,NO. t LOWER PECAN CREEK DRAINAGE CHANNEL PO NO. BID TABULATION SHEET ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL Contractor's Warranties I I I 1.21 and understandings I LS / LS I 3.3 Unclassified Excavation 3 130 Cy i C CY 113 •'C• i 3.7 I Compacted Fill 225 CY Barricades, Warning/ I j 8.1 Detour signs LS `;t1 •cr LS ~1_\~•:~' ' 99S' I I 8 3, 89t, ae 8.15. Concrete Rip-Rap Sy Sy ` SP-2 Saw Cut 10 LF S •CC' LF 'J~`•t=~' I SP-10 Rock Excavation 0 CY 30.00/ CY _ i SP-25 Remove Concrete Plume I l0 I SY 0 .,,v SY I ` `•U"` 161 20, oo TOTAL ? t I 10< 4 r4 t I r - 3 I ~ I I I t P - 3 t i , i I , 0923L n LJ , TO A NO. ZING CO UCT W? THE EXEC ORDINANCE ATICITY OF DENTONUANDN OF A CHANGE CONSTE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE R L ROBERTS AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. the City awarded a contract WHEREAS, on December 16 1986 , for the construct ono certa n mprovements to the BID Project; an West Fiidc do Welch Streets the City Manager having recommended to the Council WHEREAS, j that a change order in authorized twithetherequirements aof arty s change order being p 2368a, V.A.C.S.; NOW, THEREFORE, I I BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That the change order to the contra}n between the the amount Citya~~ ~ R~~TS CONSTRUr"^~ c0 'i of X21 641.37 is her y approve un s there or s ~ . , e an t e expen lure o thereby authorized. SECTION 11. That this ordinance shall become effective ' iame ate y upon its passage and approval. 1487 I f y PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4_ day of AUGUST 1 f ^ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: J E'ER ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS f APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: ITY ATTORNEY DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i BY: , f DATE: August 4, 1987 CITY COUNCIL REPORT I TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 1 FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER BID# 9688 WEST HICKORY & WELCH STREETS FINAL ACCEPTANCE AI4D PAYMENT RECOSRIENDATION: We recommend this change order be approved on Bid# 9688 West is ory and Welch Streets as per the attached. The total change order after reductions and additions of $21,641.37. This represents 11.4% of the total contract of $189,112.50. Therefore we are also i, The City of Denton has accepted the roject for completion ~ asking approval of the Final Payment of kk l3 5 ,6l1.U. SU199MY: The City of Denton awarded this bid in December. Construction was to completed on Welch Street first. After acceptance, the work was started on West Hickory Street. We had some delays on West Hickory for telephone, electrical, water utilities construction. We also had some delays with the Contractor. However, all phases have been completed and accepted. ,a h BACKGROUND: Change Order Payment Estimates Memorandum PROM, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED. r r Streets and Utilities FISCAL IMPACT: / These Is no additional impact on the General Fund. il 4 ~y~ k t Respe ully submitted: : a Llo d Y. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: me john I Marshall, .P.M. y Title, Purchasing Agent Approved: 0ame: ohn 3. Marshall, C.P.M. Title; Purchasing Agent ,f E;. CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texas 7820) If ~I MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 230 1987 TO: RICK SVEHLA, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER FROM s JERRY CLARK P.E., CITY ENGINEER R£: WELCH AND HICKORY STREETS PAVING AND DRAINAGE K R. L. Roberts Construction was awarded the contract for t, Welch and Hickory streets in the amount of $189,112.50. A r " pre-construction meeting was held an December 17, 1986 for 14 bath of the above mentioned streets. Welch Street was completed on January 30, 1987 with final approval by City Council In February 1997. The memo to Council is attached. The original contract amount for Welch Street was $65,069.00. Construction cost was $69,642.10 ! plus $5000.00 (check req. and copy of check is attached) to fk a> settle damages with the 8lairs. $114,470.40 were remaining r funds available to re-build Hickory Street. Original a':I ✓`~rfR contract amount for Hickory Street was $124,043.50. R.L. {('~y~Y`~s;, Roberts has completed his contract including cleanup at the total cost of $140,611.77. It was necessary to replace the 'yt# " lighting system an the west side of the Carroll Courts Building. These lights were located in the proposed location of the sidewalk. The lights will be moved by 5 > Denton Electric Company at a cost of $308.00. There will be additional costs of $200.00 for materials to relocate these lights. The contractor deducted $500.00 for damages to the sprinkler system at the Carroll Courts buildirw7. We have 4` " + had the sprinkler system repaired for $400.00 that will be paid under a different purchase order. The extra t100.00 F y. 1. will be the contractor's participation in relocating the above mentioned lights. r ~r 1 I Rick Svehla Welch and Hickory I July 23,1987 Page 2 i i The contractor completed Hickory Street using 59 work days. The contract allotted 30 days for its completion. The contractor has submitted 2 letters (enclosed) with complete justification for an extension for the ?9 days over. We feel the days are justifiable and the contractor should not be charged liquidated damages. Some changes were made to enhance this project. Reworking additional sidewalk and driveway areas to prevent water pockets and to remove f deteriated sections of pavements. The total construction f cast for the project is $2109753.87. The original contract price was $lB9,112.50. The City is requesting a change order to be approved in the amount of !210641.37. A EE complete list of averages and reductions of quantities for I' Hickory and Welch Streets are listed Below: HICKORY STREET Reductions: 2" Asphalt Pavement (patch material, 'Type D) $ 200.00 Concrete Pavement (flatwork) $ 391.20 6" Concrete Pavement $ 576.00 Ad4ust Manhole $ 350.00 Install Dowelled on Curb $10280.00 4 Total Reductions $2,797.20 Overages: ' k 4.5" Asphalt Pavement (Type A) $ 426.60 1.5" Asphalt Pavement (Type D) $ 140.40 10' Curb Inlet $29200.00 + a Concrete Curb and Gutter f 312.00 ! Driveway 6" $59752.32 PFtI' Sidewalk 4" !8,776.44 i, Concrete Rip-Rap $ 27.00 Saw Cut ! 494.00 + Adjust Water Valve $ 750,00 Special Inlet $ 500.00 18" Pipe Sewer RCP $ 26.00 24" Pipe Sewer RCP $ 32.70 Remove Concrete Pavement f 174.96 Hydromulch $ 253.75 Total Overages $19,865.47 ,r ' P i I I i Rick Svehla Welch and Hickory July 23, 1987 j Page 3 W~:LCH_S1 REST Reductions: 24" Storm Sewer Pipe (RCP) $ 320.00 Type "A" Hydrated Lime Slurrey $ 400.00 4.5" Asphalt Pavement Base (Type A) f 181.70 1.5" Asphalt Pavement (Type D) $ 59.80 Adjust Water Valves $ 250.00 Adjust Manhole $ 350.00 J Total Reductions $19561.50 . i Overages: 21+ Asphalt Pavement (Patch Material, Type D) $ 175.00 Class A Concrete (Retaining Wall) S 900.00 Concrete Curb and Gutter $ 234.00 Driveway 6" $ 495.00 Sidewalk 4" $ 72.00 Water Service Adjustments $19250.00 k Sewer Service Adjustments f 600.00 + i Change Order N1 (Concrete Encasement) $2,408.00 8 Y:, Total averages 369134.60 r Amount Paid on Welch and Hickory Streets $210,753.87 Less Contract Amount - _1891112 50 $ 21,641.37 Total Over Contract Welch Street Overages $ 69134.60 i Hickory Street Overages + --19-1865=7 Total Overages $ 269000.07 +W ` j Welch Street Reductions $ 1,561.50 " 4+ Hickory Street Reductions + __-21797180 ? = Total Reductions $ 40358.70 Total Over (Welch and Hickory) $ 219641.37 ( This change order is to be charged to the Hickory Street Project fund. We are also requesting that a final payment of f13,611.17 be 4 approved in conjunction with final acceptance for the project. t If you have any further questions, please call. f A . 1 J ry C rk, P.E. City Engineer 3 T crry at DAWTON DENY014 MXAS 76'201 CITY OF DENTON PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PL- - PAYMENT 911/566-8200, D/FH METRO 434-2520 4 Engineering Division 817/566-6359 Utility Department 817/566-b451 Periodical Estimate No, FINAL Period 5/29/81 To 6/29/87 Contractor _R. L. Roberts Construction, Inc Address P. 0. Box 375, Sanger, TX 75266 Project Hickory Street Paving d Drainage Estimated Contract Cost f IA4.112.90 Bid No. 4hRR { - -F P,0, No. 76824 (Accr.0474 002 5695A 6'91051 I No. Contract Work Days 30 Days Usad 59 1 I ; I I DESCRIPTION OF WORX I Unie I QuancieY i Quantity I I Yalue ! Item I I I of I Original I Completed I Unit I of Completed 1 ` I ( I Measure I Estimate To Data I Pricr 3 Work I 11.22 1 Contractors Warranties I 1 I I ' 1 I' 1 I s I I and Understandings 1 LS I 1 I 1 I I 1$3,600.00 1 $3,600.00 t$3,600.001$ 3,600,00 r I 1 12.11.5 I Inlet Frame and Cover 1 EA I 3 1 1 1 3 I 150.001 450.00 1 12.12,3-,t1 18" Pipe Sewer RCP I I 1 1 I 1 LF 1 134 1 135 I 20,001 3,510.00 ✓ 12,12.3-81 24" Pipe Sewer RCP 1 LF I I 1' 1 h 1 i I, 20 I 21 1 32.00 672.00. 1 12,15.3 1 Hydromulch I SY I I 1 I I 203 j 1,251 253.15 1 • f 1,3-A I Ramovi'Co`ecrete 1 I I I 1 i (Pavimant) 1 SY 1 I I I I I I 1 7 1 26.44 1 91001 237.96 13`8 I Remove Concrete I I I 3 1 (CurD,and Cutter) I I I ( I 1 I 1 1 LP 11,235 1 1,235 1 4,001 4,940.00 I 13-C I Remove Concrete I 1 i I I I (Driveways and SidevAlky) SY I i I I 1 1 600 1 I 1 1 1 600 I 8.001 4,800.00 I I 'r 13.3 1 Unclassified Excavationl CY I I F I 1 910 I 9101 4.001 3,640.00 1 I I 1 ;IYY o 1~ ° J DENTON _ 5~ay+¢~ 1 1 DEN70N, TEXAS ! feetn I DESCRIPTION OF HORK i Un£s 7620Y. 1 Quans£ty I Quaisgity; + 1 IF of I'Or£q£nal I valua.. ! keasura' Est ima I,Coapteted I.: Unit... f` 14.b-A I T ydra te To Data I ~omAleted I I Type "A" Hydrated j 1 f Price work Lime Slurray I I 1 I j.. TON l j 1 I I u 4.6-8 42 42 1 r yime'Treated Subgrabe 180.001 3 360.00 I S.7,A-1 f 4ju I Sy I 4,650 I 4;b50 r ' 1 f 1Sase (TYPet Ajavemeac I ,L• 1 2,201 51580.00 1 J SY 1547.A-2 11;n I 3,776 13 3,830 + (Type Dale Pavement .I j 7.901 "3Qioq.- ` SY I I; I 1. 3,776' 12" Asphalt Pavement '3, 830 I 2.6o). . , 19;958.00. ` + r+ I !(Type D) I I r ! I SY - 1 I 1 ; I 1-5-7-B +2Asphalt Pavement I 1 3,947 r 3,947 I I I } ! l 3.50) }3,814.50 (Patch Material, Tye D + j 1. 1 15.7-8.2 r n p I TO i 1. 2S I 1 1 11 50.00! 1rOSQ.00 1 1 f(vallaYeGutPaYament ! , a t , •21 I I ` 1 F, 5.8-A.1 IConc ter) . 1~ _-Sy'. 1'0 I ~ j' 1 rate Pavement 1 1 I 10.• • 14'.50 r 145:OOe l I(6" Flatvork) l ! 1 I I SY 1 1 I 1 1 fit' S.8-A.2 j6" Concrete pa ve 1 + 46 1 29.1 1 1 ment + f f 24600 I 112.80. 161 Curb Znlet 1 SY• ± 165 1 141 1 1 1 ; I 1 I r 24.00 1 : 3,384.00 I ! I eA' I 3 1 I 7.6 .4-4 1101 Curb Znlet 1 I 1 1 11,650.00 1 10650.00 1 r FA 1 1 E.; i.l IDetourldeam Warning `2 2,200.00 1 41400,00: 1 1 gas . 1 f' 1 I 11 1 CS ! I I 1.2-A Concrete Curb + + 1002 1 1 aad GutteiJ 6,000,00 1 6;000.00 r ; Z ! + 1.3 I I 1,220..1 ' N i 10rivevay 6„ I 1 I,: 1,272 .1 6.00 l + f 71632.00 sY '.3-d iS£deva1k"4" SY +,;225 '.'r 464:.,68 . ~ 24.00 + '11i1A2,32 j- '"I 035 lCoacreta 10 R.ip' ltap 1 I Q . I', , 587.58 1 18''00 + , 30 576.44 + '''r Cut + 25 , 6 )}i ! Sav + tP 27,00 1 ;102001 1 boo ? 1 . • 847, . ` 2.00 1 1;694.00` j'^e C DESCRIPTIQN f gait I,4uanci I Item ; I 0p WOR t K ! of Y I Quantity ( I I- ) Original ra Es I ComAla,ted ! Onfc I Yalua J I Heasu I ti-lat e' i of Pomp I SP 1. -10 IRock E To bate Pries 1 a 4ad xcaVatioa I CY I 1 work' , ! SP-151A 1 I I I., IAdjust Water Valve I 1• I Ii 50.40 .p ! I SP-15.8 1 I I 11 I 1 IAdjusc Manhole 14' ) I I 250,OOj', ;3;500.00 i SP-20 ! I EA • I ' 2 I 1 fRemova Conese is (Inlet)! I I 350,00 j 350.OQ 114 1 I I EA I s 2 f' I 1 1. ! SP-26.B I Remove 181, 2 PiPe'Sewe I i 750.001 ' 1,500 0Q 1 I r R;P LF I ASP-28 I Remove Dowelled o ! 30 1 ,1q I j a Cu 4',00 40,00 1 ! rb I' LF I 175f` I 75 P C. ISP-29 IIastall Dowelled on 17 I eOSQ,OQ ! ! I, Cur}♦ U I 6.001 ) r, I 160 + EXTRA: ! + • I ' I Special Inlet I LS l; ' f 6.001 r0 l 1 I 1. I .500.00 I. ! LESS: replace sprinklelr I ,;r I I j I r) I system I r I - I I 500:0o1 (sl)0 401. r.,,~' Till undersigned Contractor j aul equipmene.oo hand ~ectt3dd'thaq a21. ! completed os da3l covered by. this Auioc~ikpay~enedA s batectals` I amounea Yered in accar it danci:wit ` have !been. paid b , h: the Cont,rict: Doc previous Pertodicat.Pa Y him tot co:k,, I w:ancs chat all•• + thae eurrene YIDanti we >aapirtalir, and,equipminc,lot which.:++ r' ' Paymegt rhown bdreiq,lsnoy duaj;teceivd4 lr0A the oraner, and c QNTRa.C101% ' r Inc acommanded tAY ti f01 Payment:byj iota `"'w-DACd' l l l O r 4 .r. 1 Valu P. k • tgtnal Contract Performed 140 111: t'•'I roject Inspdccor, Extra pork,.Afrformad s .y Date 4 hO4n Above SO_Q 0 0, • r t '.i' •r ~•.Attached ~SCatEmanr ~----..•.,,_i,},,r ►speccioa Ddpc,r .Date Maeertals on Nand - Shoyn 1iDove o+r ` III sf N .1Ctached Stat -P0 ` rout amen; y' 1 t else f stork to>Da of I,' i • t of, 1 L,M1 N r 140,611,17 1 yA:O 1 I f _ fy't P. I I•dii L Ip at j, I . e~ I I I t Amts AdtatAed J 4 y .'I, 1 r, 1 l I"~ 1 1 '.7~ 1 I . ' r r'r dam' & r T ;I I' + 1 1 ' 'IMI Y11 r 1 1 r t+at Q ~a" 1111 Ir•;., i,. 1 , --,,,r i' p''Yed m unt r +iRFd o~.Contract 1 , i I ro for PAYS* nt 1 ti Mu'l' yl ri.F,I I rlr. 6Q r I .n i i fl•.,i~M1l •IJIII r,yl ~ ,1 1i'iaJ ' J.. 7•+1'r Less .Amount'of:'grevi'ous " . I:' payments 1 7,000.bO iltcy Dapc, or City En "L" C9 DOE TJ1IS ESTIJIATE 9r. Dace 13~611 3 12~ I CfTY of DENTON DENTOM, TEXAS Jesol f MEMORANDUM l i I DATE: April 27, 1987 '10: CITY COUNCIL j FROM., Jerry Clark, City Engineer a SUBJECT: belch Street Overview A pre-construction meeting was held for this project on "I December 17, 1986. The project was allotted 28 calendar days for completion. Work was completed on January 3O, 1987 with 40 Fr calendar days, used. The contractor worked ev.ry day except { Sundays and holidays. l s The overage of days was due to utility relocations. The utilities requiring relocation were telephone (GTE), Sammons tp`t cable ar^a a North Texas communication line. The utility lines f had to be removed from the west side of the street to the new E; poles on the east side. } The contract amount was $650069,00. The contract was completed for $69,642.10. This is an overage of $4,573.10 or 71, Amount ~t retained for final payment is 101 or $6,964.21. This overage was due to several field conditions that are not,rtal to a Sri ",r project in an older area. The contractor encountered an 4 existing sewer line that had only 18" of cover. This line had w, to be encased or replaced to protect it from being crushed. We j decided tu encase it due to time and cost involved in replacing ty the line. The additional cost for encasement was $20408.00. This is S;,1 of the total overage. I The remainder of the overage was from five additional water service adjustments, two additional sewer adjustments and an j additional c veway. We felt our storm sewer design would not I effect all t, services but results showed otherwise. It is recommended that this project be approved for final ' payment and no liquidated damages be assessed to the contractor. The contractor showed excellent cooperative efforts with the utility companies and worked every available F se day with reasonable crews. Inspector of the project shows that it is functioning as designed. IM r San ster errY Project g Inspector City E ne F~ 0453E + *;1 ` `k i 1 i CHECKAEGUISITION -VOUCHER V CHECK NVNYEII keylDOiTd U: Blair-&a Anr, L. Nluir $ 5 , C j6 .'..f AMOUNT PubliC 1 orks/fn,;inrErinr Div 2. 1 DEPMTMENT f Juan li, 107 DATI I INVOICE DATI, NUIctE1Ak01011 !%N ACCT. N0. NIT INV. AMT, :iliir eettlemt-nt (for :;rich aCYe, t ppp,(!D paving project) r~` ]f lililiJ % E i 1 y ~ ~ 1.1 fIj11` . J7~t; r y \ q ~ y re , u t h T f ~ 1i a 4 ti g i T III 1. p~yrt f` a II } s, TOTAL THE ABOVE HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDATION FOR BILLINO iS MADE BY THE UNOERSIONE0. t ~ .l 1, r 1 ACOCNTlNO APPRDVAI IN)NATUIIE ~ yl~ CRV MANAOIR APMOVAL DIFIVOR OF FINANCEAPP"A. . . i F r ; i x. I r e t O• P a t "Y, NC 1.""1 L 11"•1. 1"1 ""1 1 r{• r"e.1!'Ib"o"1" ro t PAYMENT VOUCHER PURCHASE ITEMS I` DATE NUMSER ORDER NO. AMOUNT 'S *00 • Ober b 'a r a , . w" ; ~N !y Y j e I Y J l' 4 TE1452500 CKI 06 79 TOTAL iiia5.000.00 PLEASE DETACH SEFORE DEPOSITINO CITY OF DENTON 063679 COEMTINOACCOUNT CNECRNUMSER 063679 al OENTON.TEKAS nL r 144 Y 11,1 , 00 CENTS iiSlii3.000•QO yLT°' PAY •+iiiss.ooo DOLLARS AND M ; " yI r, 1 1 L NMSy '.r 1 i To THI ORDER W ANN G8LA1R rw f s ' 1 VOID If or TER I w.ara CIO DAY/ n L_ V Iv I , I rwNTON. fto$ prr wwuoa t ; 5 ' L9 f474 i. " sa00 LO LIPS Sol : I~J ~ 1" rOF.3679~ i. L T r l Y li r r THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Release executed this'a5~ day of June, 1987, b ANN COPE CURTIS, a/k/a ANN CURTIS BLAIR ("Claimant"), of Denton County, Texas, , witnesseth: of Whereas, on December 1, 1986, Claimant was the owner of certain property located in the City and County of Denton, Texas, as described by deed from W. T. Potts, and wife, Jessie B. Potts to 0. M. Curtis, dated March 6, 1907, and recorded in volume 185, page 143, of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas; and, i Whereas, on December 1, 1986, Claimant did bargain, sell and convey, upon the receipt of valuable consideration, unto the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation County of Denton, State of Texas ("C it"), easements of the cover- ing Claimant's land, tt;e easements beinmoreempart p described as follows: g particularly articularly 1 (1) An easement, as recorded in volume 20351 page 606, of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, for the purpose, as described therein, of constructingt, installing, repairing and maintain- ing sidewalks and public utilities in, along, upon, and across the property described therein) and, (2) An easement, as recorded in volume 20350 page 608, of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, for the purpose, as described therein, of constructing, installing, repairing, and maintaining streets, drainage and public utilities in, along, upon and across the property described therein) and, l ~f ~ ' Whereas, after the date of the granting of the easements described above, city undertook to construct, reconstruct, or improve the streets, sidewalks, drainage facilities, and utilities within the easements and, Whereas, during and after completion of the construction r of the improvements by the City, Claimant made a claim that + the construction of the improvements has caused loss and # permanent damage to the property owned by Claimant for which compensation has not previously been paid, including loss of direct access to an existing garage located on Claimant's land) and, Whereas, Claimant and City desire to avoid further dispute and litigation in this matter) Now, thereforet In consideration of the payment of Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($5,000.00) by City to Claimant, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Claimant hereby releases and discharges the City, its officers, agents, or contractors, of and from all manner of claims, causes of action, or demands whatsoever in law or in equity which the Claimant may now have against City, irs officer, agents, or contractors, for damages to Claimant'r, ]and resulting from the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of any streets, sidewalks, drainage facilities, or utilities, or portions thereof, undertaken by City prior to this date, upon, within, or immediately adjacent to the easements granted by Claimant to City as described above, including but not limited to any claim based upon the interference with or loss of vehicular access to any building or garages upon Claimant's land or any devaluation of the market value of Claimant's land, resulting from the construction of the improvements herein described. Executed this &S ~ day of Sung. , 1987. 1 I CLAIMANT I! ~~L t.l~ IoLEf 1 3L ANN C. BLAIR l THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON On this day of ~Ur4, , 1987, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared Ann. C. Blair, personally known to me (or proved to me on th4 basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged that she executod it. Witness my hand and official seal. t / xxyr rUM, tas r lam J fI `'a x•34 ?0 NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS ! A~ RELEASR/PAOE Two 87.367 i ti .an.r. CITY of DBNTON 5e54u~tery DFNTON, rffx4.s t0 CITY OP DENTQN PERIODICAL ESTIXATE POR PARTIAL PAYMENT 817/Sb6.8200, 0/FSt METRO 131-2520 Engineering Division A1T/566-8358 Utility Department E17/566-BI51 Periodical Estimate No. Final A. L. Robere Period Contractor VIII Construction, Inc To__, Project .fleteh Ser---.~R Address v_ inp b Drainsp! X 7 266 " Bid No. - Estimated Contract Cost S 9 i P.O. No. ] 824 Acc f No. Contract Work Days 1 634 002 S88 9105 1 28 Days Used 40 I I 4 DESCRIPTION OP HOAX I Unit 1uantity I Quantit I Item 1 I ! o! Y 1 I I Contractors UarrantiasJ X asure 1 Original I Completed f unit I y+lue ;'a + I 1 11 to Imate I To Date P J of Completed ,21 W k -ric I and Understandings I 1 I ! 1 I If LS ' $2300.00 1 1 I I 2e11.5 1 Inlet Frame and Cover f I $2300,00 1$2500.00 1 ; 21300.00 1 EA I 1 f 1 I r A" 1 2.12,3-21 24" Pipe sever RCP f f I 1 I 130.00 I 1 1 1 LF 1 330 1 ' I 130,0E 1 3-A I Remove Concrete i J 320 1 32.00 1 Los, OC 1 I (Pavement) . 1 Sy 1 I I 1 1 7 1 f 1 Remove Concrete I 1 9'00 1 63.00 l 1 3•e 1 (Curb and Cutter) I 1 J I I r.: 1 1 1 LP I 1 I ssa 1 1 I I 1 Remove Concrete I I I ssQ 4.00 1 2,200.0o i r I 3•C I (DrivtYa I I I 1 1 yes Sidevalks)I SY 1 360 1 I f 1 I I Preparation of I 360 1 8,00 1 2,880.00 j 13.1 1 I 1 M` 1 Right-of-way I I ti 1 I Y I LS 1 $3000,00 1 1 1 1 J 3.3 I Unclassified ExcavaEioI Cy I I 3000.00 1 3000.00 I 1 f I 1 3,000.001 J I TYP+ "A" Hydrated 1 600 i 600,00 I 4.00 1 21400.00 1 4.6-A Lime I I Slurry I TON + 1 ' ~ --~..ls- i I 1 440.00 j 1 tr y. 1, .y.. t 'AD) wry of vzNr0N Al _ SESQUt~y19NtE f I orNrON D6SCAIPTION Of T' I I e,~ I r$ I Unit I Quantity 1 WORK f of 'I Original Quantity 1 completed ` I I ~aluei Lime Treated Measvr I Price °+"Plet i tstfmate J To Date Unit I of Subgrade r SY • . 1 1690 1 ! S. 7.A-1 141" Asphalt Pavemant 1 r + 1690 1 1.20 I Base yp A) I I I f 1 2,018.G1 I + SY 1 1400 J f3 I 15, 7,A-2 1 (T.,pe D~ali pavement 1377 r f I t I 7.90 It I I I 10,878,3['' I I I sY I f r I 1 5.7-8 Asphalt Pavement lcoo I J I I 1377 1 (Patch fiaterial, f I 2'60 1 3,580,20 I TYPO D) TON I. ( 1 1 concrete Pavement I 5 1 7,5 tons I I 13.8-A,! r (6 rlatvorkI 10.00 I. I 1 1 I ~ f 1525.00 a t r 1 class All Sy 1 46 I 1 I 1 7.4.5 I A Concrete I 1 I 66 I 24,00 1 + ' 1 f (Retainin6 wail) I rY 1 1,104.00 f 5 r ~ I r ' P'6•A-! fandRCoverJunction Box i I 8 300.00 1 1 i 2x400.00 1 1 f7.6.A-2 J 8' Curb Inlet x s 1 1 I EA I ~-+a 7Sla Qp__ I 1 e.,__ barricades, warning- 1 I I E i 1 I 1 18, I I Detour Sims 1 1830.00 1 ` 4r f 1 I !S 1 1,850.00 r r 18,2•A 1 $20000.001 loo; i2ooo. 1 ! 1 i Concrete Curb and cutt4 LF I 00 1 2,000.00 8.3 1Orivcvay 6,. 1 520 1 339.0 I f 1 I Sy 1 r 6.00 f 3054.00 18.3•A f5ldcwalk a" I + 113 I 133.63 I f r J 1 SY I 1 24.00 I 3,253.60 jRelnrorcin I 1 226 1 230 I a steer 1 to f J 11 le.ao I 4,140.00 ISP-2 I 265 I 263 I . Isnv cut f ! f LF I 1 .80 1 I ISP-10 1Roek Exeevation 1 I 28 I 28 1 212.00 1 I 1 2.00 1 j fSP-13.A I I Cy 1 1 36,00 1 1 f L I I'd just water Valve 1 1 0 1 30.00 1 I r I EA 1 1 .0, 1 ISP-15.J! jAdjust lfanhola 1 1 1 I 0 I k I 1 EA 1 I 1230.00 I -0- I" I I 1 0 1 350.00 j I r! 1 r -o` I f -t; I 1 l to I 1 lC 1 5 j i I 1 11 m + r 7 aCRSPrSON I Vni! 1 OF WORK I of I Cu+ntlly 1 Ou+nl1! I Flea ere r Cit9~nei I Cempleled I ( v ISP-16 I I ate I Vni! alp C I I Handicap Ramp I TO pate Prf I of wort empl 1 r r ASP-20 ! 4 I I f Rem 1 ove Concrete (Lnlet~ EA 1 4 I 1 250.001 1,000.0 I SP-26.A 1 5evereCyp'r. Pipe 1 1 1 I 1 750,001 1 ( I 50.001 750.0 II SP-27.A I eater I LF 317 1 1 1 ASP-27.8 I Sever Service Service Adluatmer~t EA i 2 i 3:7 1 4.00 10268.0( I hd3u 7 stime it I I £A 1 , !`f 250.00 I . 750. OC j I I 1 2 r 4 I 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 1 300.001 l,too.ao 1 1 I I [ [Change Order I1 1 1 1 1 I f 1 1 [ 1 I [ 1 [ [ I 300 1 344 I 1 } 1 1 ± I ' 7.00 I 2,408.00 ' r I 1 1' 1 The undetslgned Conl and equipment an eacter eeelLfles ! hand ha! all work completed of delivered ceveced by this Pe , lncludin amounts have Pala 6n accordance withtlodieel Payieent hai beencials L' i Previous p been y him the Contract D i etiodieal pa for work, materials and ocumente, that all r that current payme shown t ymanta were leaved and e s CON herein is now due •celved ftwiDmen! for vhieh TRACTOR R. the owned 'and L. Roberts Construeti~l(0yc' Reeommen d toe Pa Ymen! byF Total Date sy'~--L • ' + Ptoie! Value of Ori na1 Contract Per In 7 4 , apEtot aali extra Work pal for ed formed Shown Above or ' tnspeelion Attached statement vQ aepl, materials Date on Hand - shown Above or 's Attached statement Total Value of Work to Date 4 f Leas' Amt. Retained Contract Net Amount Earned on Approved for Payment syJ 1 Less Amount of prey sous payments Y,Dept. BALANCE at city cn t. Date DCe lg7S CSTTRATe 62- 8-9- ' j 17l1~ ~ { a i { I CITY of OLNTOD N D<NTON, TEXAS FORM MSMORANDUTt I DATSt December 12, 1966 TOt John Marshall, Purchasing Agent E FROKt Jerry Clark, City Engineer ` 80EJECTt WILCH AND HICKORT STREST PAYING AND DRAINAGS BID 19688 t ' The low bidder for the proJeots is R. L. Roberts Construction with a total bid of $1899112.50. In the contract documents, a very short construction ties few* was set up so that Welch Street could be built while the students at NT90 were gone on bteat. Hickory Street is also sahedulad to build one half at a time to keep adequate access to businesses in the area. These two items probably raised the costs of building the proisots to the contractor. Our original estimate vas about $1600000. $140,61• Original funding Hight-of-way funds spent 110100 Engineering fees to date $1545,544 This leaves about 131,568 to be funded not including engineering fees. inspeation, surveying and construction engineering could run "0Rhar 13,000 to $50000 to complete the projsot. MAt means an extra $40,000 is needed. Activity 8510 (Hickory Street) has about 1495,000. We rscomsrend that this i project be approved. If the next section of Hickory toHbe bidh has prablaw4ht ~d with funds, cuts in the project will have to be made. interest will be going back into the proJsot activity to cover inflation gad contingencies of the particular bid date. " j j J1 JJor y Clar 20215 I~ T t Rv ~a a0 ~ ~~3~~ QO~J~4pMs~)0'~l, J'`J~~ 1 April 16, 1987 City of Denton Engineering Department 215 E. McKinney j Denton, Texas 76201 ATTN: RODGER MCDANIEL t r ' + RE: COMPLETION TIME - HICKORY STREET PROJECT Dear Rodgers The Hickory Street project has thirty (30) working days allotted for ' completion. Tim,; charged as of April 11, 1987 xis twenty-eight (28) work- ing days. This only leaves two (2) days remaining. You and I both know . n ' there is no way to complete the project in the time allotted. a The Hickory Street project is a difficult task in regards to barri- cading, traffic control, work accessability and the ability to progress efficiently, This project Is such that all the different stages cannot be dine together. The storm sewer had to be completed before the excava- j,n,, tion; the excavation before the lime; the lime before the asphalt and so on. This with the fact that the project had to be built one half at a time is the reason the project cannot be built in the thirty (30) say xE " time allotted, We have worked this project when possible in the moct efficient man- nar. Here is r. list explaining how the project has progressed so fart days Start up; saw cut; barricade; locate lines 4 ' 1 Bust out inlets 1 Bust out and tie In RCP G~ 2 Lay RCP ! 1 Finish RCP on north side; pour inlet; start taking out inlet 2 Finish taking out inlet; lay RCP 6 Excavate; pull out concreta; grade for lime 1 Put out lime ` x a 1 Got gradation ;aY1 Compact and fine grade Pal Office Box 375 e 1301 South 1.35 a Fsnger, Taxes 79299 a Telephone (1317) 469.314? I , J A 6 :c } r _ _l_ i Rlb 16 G30HAN C00 h6 mialonj 1? m { 1 Lay 2" HMAC 4 Pour drive, curb, inlet tops 1 Backfill curb 1 Lay 11" HMAC Base r, 2 Pour sidewalks 28 days We expect the second half of the project to progress a little slower, due to the following problems not encountered on the north side: , 1. MBank drive must be maintained.. 2. The turn lane on Carroll 3. A larger amount of r? zrt parking problems 4. Electrical and phone lines to be installed 5. Power pole at Carroll not yet removed 6. Electrical department in street same time we were excavating , 7. Water mains at Cedar 6 Hickory to be lowered " Due to the problems already encountered and the ones we already know of in the second half, along with the fact that the south side is a larger amount of work, we are asking that the time allotted be increased to seventy (70) working days. We do feel that we have performed efficiently. We also feel that with the cooperation of everyone involved, the project will be " completed as soon as passible. We appreciate your help thus far and will appreciate your help in the remainder of the project, Thanka, a i. x r I ' Ricky emons R. L, Roberts Construction, Inc. RL/skc j i `i. l F t I tw44 1 t4y{ L 1' Y/ y ~ .E nr . Poet Office Box 376.1301 South 145 Singer, Texas 78266 a Telephone (817) 458.3147 a y I '1 r + . r' T ~ r. ♦ r o,r.. r,. 1, I 4 :...~.:,w.• 2 f }Y r ` rl it AD HMO COMM00301ha JM3 July 14, 1987 City of Der. Engineering -epattment t 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 ATTN: ROGER McDANIEL + RE: DAYS USED-HICKORY STREET PROJECT s r > ?I* ,'k Dear Roger: The number of contract work days on said project was thirty (30). As referred in our letter dated April 16, 1987 to you, we were requesting seventy (70) days to complete the project. c The Northside of Hickory Project was built in twenty eight (28) days as stated in our letter from Rick Lemons to you. 4j? We feel we have worked this project whenever possible in the r w, , most efficient and business-like manner. Here to a list e's- °k r ; plaining how the Southside of the project progressed on a G v daily basis. y April 9 thru April 13 5 days JS l{I 4 Yes excavation, pour concrete and asphalt April 14 thru May 8 (24)d+ys fit' 1' F City of Denton Water, Sewer, and electrics d GTE, *No days charged during this time. r yd ~r t t ^ t: May 9 6 10 ' zdays rough cut 6 cut out turn lane on Carroll Slvl. Baal ~w' May 11 l day put out lime . ntirvl . f r :4t May 12 thru 15 3 days lime cured u l k4 f Pat Office Box 37S a 1301 South 1.35 a Sanger, Texas 75266 • Telephone (817) 456.3147 .1 , r fVr JI I 1 ~ Wo~io IN`/~" ~~~c'7 ~'VITJ'J~WV~II~~©IfVJ ~~JV~o May 16 1 day I gradation q May l8 & 19 2 days fine grade street r, May 20 1 day ~c denesities , r May 21 1 da lay 2" IIMAC y May 22 thru June 5 9 days curb & gutter, driveways, inlets and turn lane paved. June 8 I day ri preparation and lay base 1k June 9 thru June 15 rain days June 19 1 day lay 43" base x~ June 22 thru 24 3 days t, raise manholes, valves & clean up 4~ ~r 4 y fir, 1 T us! June 25 1 day lay topping t1v a June 26 i day r' ;a t<r) MBank patching and clean up 4, , ..r` ` 32 days Roger, tie referred in our April 16 latter, it t6 twenty eight (28) days to complete the Northside and thirty tw) (32) days to complete the Southside making a total of sixty a''r mfr` r (60) days, The reason this is one more day than the fifty nine (59) days is due to an overlap o2 starting the South- r rl, y` side when we were finishing the Northolde, a Y Pat OMIa Box 375 " 1301 South I.36.Sanger, Texas 74286 " TNepnone (611) 45fs--3117 e~ ra o-. 7 fJl u ` J Y Y ~ A'. J i pv 16 DO AU QoMmialoho imr, We would like r.o also not+ that we did more work than was called for in the origins. contract documents and the diffi- cultly in pulling off and on the project for the City of Denton crews and GTE . Therefore we are requesting an extension of nJentY nine , .r. , t ^ (29) working days to complete this contract satisfactory. We hope this letter -xplains thoroughly enough the reasons S for using fifty nine (59) working days to complete this project and we appreciate your concern in this natter. 3. 5tnrA~rely Yours,,-) it. L. Roberts 'rrJ to Xi I p`. rIK ~Y f ~r y }to r ~ y + AF's'. ~ F y p )r s r A ~ ' 11~yy1 ^j er } r~~tl'~ •tie d. i 1; •y f y _ t 1 I t d 'r r a v. 1 ' vt ` 'k t" , rrJ t rr . Post Off ive Box 375 a 1301 South 1. 35 6 Sanger, Texas 75215 a Telephone (817) 466-3141 .a r r aln. 4.r 1 t 9 e , y~ i ( •1;3:..+ 4tk: If ~'F1 r M.w n r ' r " Y ..L l IS37L M i NO. I AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE NUMBER OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO BE EMPLOYED IN EACH CLASSIFIED POSITION IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: f SECTION I. That, until otherwise determined by the City Council, the ollowing nuuher of persons shall he authorized to he employed in each classified position in the Police Department: 1 CHIEF 01' POLICE '3 DIVISION COMMANDERS 6 LIEUTENANTS , ' 10 SERGEANTS ' 63 POLICE OFFICERS. , a 5 SECTION 11, That all ordinarn:es and resolLttons in conflict herew t are repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 111. That this ordinance shall hecome effective immediately iipan its p,issage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1987, "w y' C % .t 4 W , r r ' MAYOR ,r ATTEST: "I s, M JENNIFER W EVE'RRS,CITY SEC EE7 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY • i r1 DATE: August 4, 1987 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEP.E,ERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER ORDINANCE FOR INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY AIR CONDITIONING, HEAT STORAGE PUMPS AND THERMAL RECOMMENDATION: s j The Public Utilities Board, at their meetinJ of July 22, 1987, recommended to the City Council approval of proposed ordinance. jj SUMMARY: ' f The proposed ordinance will establish the guidelines to pay incentive payments to customers to install high efficiency air conditioners and heat pumps in new or existing residential or commercial facilities. This program is similar to those being offered by the private utilities adjacent to our service area. The City of Austin's program is more and gives more for replacement r of units than new units to encourage early replacement of I existing units. IIII BACKGROUND: i The long-range objective of this program is to reduce energy demand and consumption which will reduce customers' utility bills and the peak load of the electric system. The reduction in the capacity requirements for the next generation unit capacity which will be required In the future. f PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton, existing and future electric customers. F FISCAL IMPACT: ' This o ram was app P g rovad in the Capital Improvement Plan with 1363,000 being allocated for 1988 and escalated approximately 101 for the following years for a total of X2,187,000 for the five year period. i °I I i t I i { Res ctffuully submitted, oy arre City Manager Prepared by 6 Approved by: I f R$ Nelson- -Fxecut ve 1YW-ector Department of Utilities I~ i i . ~ h f ti } EXHITIT I Ordinance " 11 Contract I III Minutes PUB 7/22/87 i A. 4~! N n ~ I i 1 1 I _I 1 {f t ; it A ~i I i J1 ' ' { 1 ' 111 4 I ~ A'e % 0'' t ,Ya •Ji`i1: r'IWI'YAM fMY~,.i i.. . i ir. n. i.~{ .n: ini~.. ~a\W11 Y.rWfY gal J 1 i 1839L O NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN APPLIANCE REBATE PROGRAM AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, tha City Council of the City of Denton recognizes that the generation and distribution of electric power is a public purpose, for which its conservation is duly recognized; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton, by and through its City Council desires to reduce everQyy demand and consumption by the customers of City of Denton Utilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that through the use of energy efficient equipment by the utility customers of the City of Denton su4h energy demand and consumption would be reduced and the ef`ielency of the electric utility system would be enhanced; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION 1. That it is the desire of the City Council to estaBllsh a program to provide limited cash incentives to Denton Utility customers who purchase certain energy efficient equipment that reduce energy demand and consumption, SECTION 11. That the Appliance Rebate Program, attach ad hereto an mae a part hereof is hereby adopted to implement the objectives described above for as long as funding is available for such a program, ,I SECTION Ill. That the City Council hereby authorizes and direct` s`tthe Urty Manager to take such action as is necessary to achieve such Qoat of reducing energy demand and consumption by implementing the Appliance Rebate Program. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of RAY STIEPHENSp ATTESTi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM, DEBRA ADAAMII~ DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY y 1840L CITY OF DENTON UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1987 APPLIANCE REBATE PROGRAM METHODS USED IN DETERMINING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY AND ELIGIBILITY Program Summary T he City of Denton Utility Department is offering cash payments to customers who purchase and install certain or neat pumps in new or existing gh reefficiency sidential air commercial facilities. The program's ohjective is to reduce energy demand and consump- tion, thereby saving customers dollars on their utility hills and ' achieve the goal of reducing the peak load of the City of Denton's electric generation. Program Guidelines w R 1, All installations must he for accounts served by the City of Denton Utility Department, and must meet all applicable national, local, and manufacturers' codes and specifications. 2. To qualify for a rebate, equipment must he new when installed. s 3. All equipment must he purchased. No leased or lease/purchase ;J t`4 equipment will qualify for a cash rebate, } 4, Installations must he made by participating contractors and/or dealers. ! S. No rebate will he paid on a partial replacement of an air conditioner. The compressor, condenser and the evaporator coil must he replaced to qualify for a rebate, 6. Payments for a residential central cooling system, which includes apartments and mohile homes, will he limited to a capacity based on a minimum of S00 conditioned square feet per ton. The conditioned area in square feet is required on each resi- dential central system request for payment. 7. Payments shall he limited to a maximum combined capacity of 60 tons (720 000 BTUIO per meter for all new or replaced installe- tions. The maximum unit site is 11.25 tons, but combinations rl of units up to 60 tons are eligible. 8. The rebate will he paid to the purchaser of the qualifying equipment upon verification of compliance with program + guidelines. 1. I 9. Requests for payment must he received by the Director of Electric Utilities within 60 days of installation. 10. Equipment and installation are subject to inspection by the 4 City's Building Inspection Department before final approval for payment is issued. 11. The Appliance Rebate Program guidelines and payments are subject to change without notice. 12. The Appliance Rebate Program may he discontinued without prior notice at any time by the City of Denton. 1 I. GENERAL PROCEDURES A. Application To determine who qualifies for a rebate, an application for rebate must he completed and sent to the Director of Electric Utilities within 60 da s of installation of the equipment. Particlpat ng ea ers ave re at3 cards and will complete these cards for the purchaser. It is the { purchaser's responsibility to see that the dealer completes the card and submits it to the Director of Electric Utilities. ' B. Inspections Random "spot-checks" of equipment and installations will he J made by the City's Building Inspection Department. The p Department will contact applicants and schedule appoint- ments for site visits. C. Payments to Participants * Cash payments will he made to the purchaser of the qualify- ing equipment. Participatin retail equipment dealers will receive a cash payment of 120 per unit for the sale of window units, central air conditioning systems, or heat pumps to•~offset their cost for properly filling out the applications for purchasers. Program participants are p,« responsible for submitting the correct information. The Utility Department will not issue any additional payment unless tho payment was incorrect due to a mistake in processing by a City employee. 1. The Twenty Dollar ($20.00) payments to dealers will he made only if they supply the qualifying equipment to the customer or builder who is paying for the installation of the equipment. Dealers and purchasers may he denied PAGE 2 r. 1 payment for failure to follow program guidelines such as: failing to supply correct square footage for Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) figures; installing equipment which is not new; replacing part of a split system; and failure to fill out rebate cards properly. 2. Payments will he made to customers who purchase and install new qualifying equipment. If a tenant pur chases and installs qualifying equipment, the payment i is made to the tenant. If the owner of rental pro- perty purchases and installs qualifying equipment, the payment is made to the owner. If the purchaser of a mobile or custom home selects and pays for a qualifying unit, the purchaser will receive the rebate. 11. CENTRAL ELECTRIC AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS A. A new condensing unit with an inside evaporator coil will qualify, if matched as specified in the current issue of the ARI Directory of Certified Air Conditioners and Air Source Heat Pumps and the unit meets the minimum ratings t as specified in the 1987 Appliance Rebate Program. If the ry ` I ucit is not in the current ARI Directory, the manu- facturers' latest data approved for publication will he accepted. ti If the unit is not in the current Ai,1 Directory or data approved for publication, the average of the high and low SEER/EER toll only, not including blower coil, will he accepted as listed in the current ARI Directory. B. Computer simulations may he used if ratings are not listed in the current ARI Directory, provided the following ' criteria are met: }4 I 1. Systems using mix-matched coils must meet all estah- lished program guidelines to qualify for a rebate. 1. The computer simulations must be signed, certified, and " dated„ by a registered rofessionalengineer and an officer of the company mac ng t`}-iers`u m tth i al: 3. The engineer who certifies a simulation must attest to the accuracy of the input data, the validity of the calculation procedure used, and that the results are in accordance with D.O.E. approved methodology. 4. A complete set of the input data and an indication of the source of the data must accompany the simulated ratings. LR i 1 r f M1 I ` PAGE 3 t III t 4 .i Y~I 1 5. The simulated ratings must he based on the condensing unit's tested combination as listed in the current ARI Directory or latest data approved for publication and identified by the correct model numbers of both the condensing unit and coil as listed in the current ARI. 6. Simulated ratings must not exceed 1051 of the SEER rating of the tested system used as a base, An open file of computer simulations will he maintained at the office of the Director of Electric Utilities. Suppplying erroneous ratings or data can lead to dis- qualification of those involved from further program i participation. C. Program Capacity and Payment Formula R: 1, The maximum allowable BTU per hour capacity eligible for a rebate is determined by dividing the square footage of the conditioned area by S00 and multiplying by 12,000. Example: The Program capacity for a 1,500 square foot F house Is: 1 S00 ` 3.0 x 12,000 36,000 BTUH The City will pay a rehato on a unit that meets program efficiency standards and is sized at 360000 BTUH or less. 2. Actual payment will he determined by dividirg the BTUH of the installed unit iup to, and including the Program Capacity) by 12,000 and multiplying by the incentive, which is determined by the efficiency rating of the unit. The incentive values and SEER ratings are referenced on page 6 and are Incorporated herein as if fully set i ' forth at length; Exampie As A person in a 19S00 square font house installs a 30,000 BTUH central air conditioner with an SEER rating of 10.0. 1 500 • 3 x 12,000 36,000 Program Capacity fi l ~30 000 lY,0a0 2.S x $60/ton $1SO Rebate Amount i 4Vd PAGE 4 d • i Example B: A person in a 2,000 square foot house installs a 60,000 BTUH central air conditioner with a SEER rating of 10.0. 2 000 4 x 12,000 ■ 48,000 Program Capacity 48 000 4 12,006 4 x 160/ton ■ 1240 Rebate Amount Example C. A person in a 2,000 square foot house installs a 60,000 BTUH three phase central heat pump with a SEER rating of 9.0. 2 000 f~ 4 x 12,000 48,000 Program Capacity 48 000 f 3a6b 4 x 17S/ton ■ 1300 Rebate Amount N, 5. the air conditioning coy,tractor is responsible for :;5 1 supplying the correct conditioned square footage information for each residential and commercial installation.' D, Thermal Storage Incentive Payments ' Thermal storage incentive payments shall hr made to qualifying customers based on the following method; 'y A design shall he submitted to the Director of Electric Utilities for approval. The thermal storage equipment f` shall he checked for input electric demand (KW) and output E capacity (BTU). The system shall he limited for incentive payment to a maximum of 12,000 BTU per 500 square feet of the conditioned .rea of the facility to he served. Upon completion, the input/output of the thermal storage units will he measured by the City of Uenton. The customer may observe and verify all information and calculations for the actual si J of the facility. Auxiliary equipment used to circulate fluid or air handlers which would operate under normal peak periods will not he included in calculating the KW load for Incentive payments. PAGE S~ :F d t a CITY OF DENTON UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1987 APPLIANCE REBATE PROGRAM EQUIPMENT INCENTIVES* i Minimum E j Efficiency Seermum Central Air Conditi ning Rating Incentive Single Phase (SEER) 0-20,999 BTUH 9.5 40/ton r+ 21,000 BTUH 6 up 10.0 60/ton r.. Three Phase (EER) + O-I3S,00O B7'UH 9.0 $40/ton Central (feat Pumps r Single Phase (SEER) 9.6 $7S/ton e Three Phase (EER) e 0-1359000 BTUH 9,0 $7S/ton a1, r' Room Air Conditioners 9.0 $50/unit ` Room Heat Pumps ti 9.0 $50/unit Thermal Storage $35U/Kw First 200Kw** f Commercial/Industrial Customer for Cooling during Summer 250/Kw Next 300KwRa on Peak Period 200/Kw All Above . ;.SOOKw** * Refer to 111987 Appliance Rebate Program; Methods Used In Determining Equipment Efficiency and Eligihility" .:y as Kw Demand Reduetio. i; For calculation purposes, one ton equals 12,000 BTUH s f ear f„ , VP f f 4 j~ y r n I}F. PAGE 6 l ' 1 'p ! e d EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES July 22, 1987 10. CONSIDER INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR HIGH EFFICIENTY AIR . Nelson opened the discussion, with Tullos stating the rebate/incentive program purpose is to encourage people to install more energy efficient appliances, Thy program will benefit in two ways. (1) The customer will save through lower energy consumption and (2) the City will save through lower demand costs. The proposed ordinance will establish the guidelines to pay Incentive payments to customers to install high efficiency air conditioners and heat pumps in new or existing residential or commercial facilities. This program is similar to those being offered by the private i utilities adjacent to our service area, The City of Austin's program Is more extensive and gives more compensation for replacement of units than new units to encourage early replacement of existing units. ! The long-range objective of this program is to reduce i ! energy demand and consumption which will reduce customers' utility bills and the peak load of the electric system. The reduction In the capacity requirements for the next generation unit capacity which will be required in the future. f This ro ram was approved in the Capital Improvement Plan $3639000 being allocated for 1988 and escalated approximately 10i for the following years for a total of $2,187,000 for the five year period. After much discussion, Laney commented that we are in the rocessof developing criteria to encourage developers to build "smart buildings. Tullos stated there are some changes within the building codes that need to be made. Thompson asked how we would monitor such a program. Tullos indicated through long term efficiency ratios, j customer billings and customer billing histories. Nelson i stated to customer mand accuunts will are working have these procedures. { Thompson recommend approval of this program to the City Council if the City develops the capability of monitoring the system to determine economic feasibility. Second by LaForte. All ayes, no nayes, motion carried. 1 DATE: August 4, 1987 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM I T0: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager f SUBJECT: CONSIDER AN ORDINANCF APPROVING' AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND LUIZ, DAILY AND BRAIN III FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATF. I j (Feasibility Study for Central Heating/Cooling Plant for i City Hall Complex Buildings j } t RECOMMENDATION: s J I The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of July 12, 1987, recommended to the City Council approval of a contract with Lutz, Daily and Brain in the amount of $19,000 to conduct a study for a central heating/cooling plant for the City Hall complex buildings. f SUMMARY: i Presently, the Citw Hail, Civic Center and Library have a central chiller for cooling, ar.d each building utilizes electric resistance for heating. The central chiller is nearly 20 years old and is in need of replacement as soon as possible. Electric resistance heat is a very costly method of heating the City facilities. One of the basic policies of the Utility Department is to explore methods x + y which the Utilities could be a full service energy supplier. The Board and Utility Staff believe that a central heating and cooling project for the City complex facilities would be an excellent opportunity to begin developing ti+e energy se.vices concept and, at the same time, help the city save money, Lutz, Daily and drain have submitted a proposal to I f, evaluate the economics of this project. The cost for this evaluation is $19,000. ~q r. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFELir.D: City of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, Legal Department, and the citizens. t i I 4 FISCAL IMPACT.' $ Cost of Study 19,000 { f Savings in electric costs for City Hall complex could be substantial. Respectfully submitted, 1 a+ 1 arre 1, ty Manager , N n1. Prepared 4 Approved by: S ` . J L' ry"•, ~e sona xeclSt ve rector a Department 0 Utilities d. + EXHIBIT I Proposed ordinance tI Contract 4`; ; I1I Minutes PUB meeting of 7/22/87 a• v 111 t G 1 II f v f , r 1867L . OUp qr N0. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND LUTZ DAILY 6 BRIAN III FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFR TIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves and auth- oritesiTie Aayor and City Secretary to execute and ,attest, respectively, the agreement between the City of Denton anr4 Lutz, Daily ` Brian III for engineering services to prep-re a feasibility study for the projected heating, cooling and energy center, under the terms and conditions contained in said agreement which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. c w SECTION II. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure of funds exceed Nineteen Thousand and Five Hundred Dollars (j19,500.00I. SECTION Ill. That this ordinance shall become effective N. imme aaT~Ty upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND,APPAOVED this the day of , 1987. } I `R RAY STEPHENS$ MAYOR ATTESTS t> JENNIFER WALTERSO CITY SECKITARY F APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: l DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY . BY s r{ II rr r Y " I i ~.1 RQi .lse 'P r.•:.: .:Y ..i ~FJlii. vAlF.:nr41 LUTI, DAILY A BRAIN CONSULT1NO 4NO0NeeR11 ti O THE STATE Of TEXAS i AGREEMENT BETWEEN Gj~ THE CITY• OFD DENTON, TEXAS AND COUNTY OF DENTON i LUTZ, DAILY 6 BRAIN III FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS COMMOTs made and executed in duplicate this of 19 , by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corpora- tion, hereinafter called the City, and LUTI, DAILY 6 BRAIN III9 Con- sulting Engineers, a general partnership of Shawnee Mission, Kansas, P. 0. Box 718, hereinafter called the Engineer, Party of the Second Part. UHEEEASI The Denton Civic Center area buildings which include the Civic Center Building, Library, Auditorium and Senior Citizen home owned by the City and the Poet Office and Court Buildings owned by the Federal Government are in close proximity to each other ands WHE2Ws The buildings have heating and cooling systems that are high energy usage, and a low efficiency system that is not suitable for present day energy conservation requirement andl 11EEEASI This campus of local and federal government buildings are f' f located so that a single high efficiency energy plant could effectively serve the heating and cooling requirements with a central h distribution system and; 1- WMMEASI The City has selected Lutz, Daily 6 Brain (Engineer) to w; prepare a feasibility study for the projected heating, cooling and i energy center and to estimate the cost that would be associated with the central energy plans and; wagEASI The City desires to enter into Contract for Professional Engineering Services as required for the purposes above stated, and the Engineer hereby offers Professional Engineering Services as re- quired for the work above. j `y WITNESSETHt That i.1 consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the City agrees to employ the Engineer to perform the types of services hereinafter mentioned and agrees to pay them for the to-vices rendered according to the schedule of fees herein contained. j j r• PACE 1 LUTZ. GAILY 4 BRAIN coNSU#LtiNO aNOiNaaRs SECTION Ii The's±rvices which the Engineer hereby agrees to perform are as follows: A. Central,hgating and cooling system-study at Civic Center Building Complex. i 1. Task Description a. Determine and project the existing and planned heating and cooling requirements for the Civic Building Complex. Determination will be made by reviewing the existing drawings of the mechanical systems in each building. A ua'.: through mechanical audit will be performed to ver- :fy installed capacity. b. Develop load duration curves for the heating and cooling f` systems in the buildings. Develop a load diversity factor based on load duration curves for a central heat- ing and cooling plant. C. Perform e' life cycle cost analysis of the following types of heating and cooling systems. (1) Individual heating and cooling systems for each ' building (base case). (2) Central heating and cooling system for the building P complex. << (a) Central electric chiller with gas/oil boiler (b} Central absorption chiller with gas/oil boiler 0 (c) Central steam driven chiller with gas/oil boiler V,t > d. Conduct a walk through energy audit of building com- plex. Identify potential energy conversation opportun- ities (ECO's) for each building. Estimate energy sav- J ings for each ECO based on past engineering experience. srr' y t { e. Prepare coat estimates for the central heating and cool- ing plant. Prepare cost estimates for the heating and x cooling distribution system to serve the building com- plex. x, i " ''i f. Perform av. economic analysis of a gas turbine-generator energy plant in conjunction with the central heating and cooling facilities. Assume that the electrical energy ► produced will be supplied to and used by the city building complex served by the energy plant. PAGE 2 a. s LUTZ, DAILY k BRAIN CONSULTING ENGINIERS prepare a report for the central h±ating and cooling system with the required auxiliary heating, cooling and power sources. B. Other Engineering Services ' During the tera of this agreement, the Engineer shall perform such other Engineering services as the City of Denton may request in writing regarding the utilities system and any modification shall be reduced to writing and made an addendum to this contract. This shall all be in accordance with tection III0 K. SECTION II. The City agrees: i A. To pay the Engineer for engineering work performed under Section I-A a a,w not to exceed $19,500.00 based on hourly rates and ex- penses as hereinafter stipulatedi a' r 1. The Engineer will charge the City at the following hourly rates for personnel assigned and working on the Project: a' } Partners $42.41 per hour Principal Engineers 28,85 per hour Senior Design Engineers 22.67 per hour Design Engineers 19.26 per hour a. Engineering Technicians 15,89 per hour Senior Draftsmen 15.33 per hour Draftsmen I' 14.32 per hour Stenos/Word Processing 11.10 per hour < Clerks 9.56 per hour r plus 54 percent of the hourly rate for direct payroll overhead, plus 94 percent of the hourly rate for general ,r and administrative overhead and profit, plus printing cost of plans and other expenses at actual cost, plus personal automobile expense at 22 cents per mile. B. It is understood that the rates for personnel and mileage in See- tion II-A are those effective as of January It 19871 and that subsequent modification may be necessary. The City agrees to review with the Engineer the above rates for personnel upon ini- tiation of services and at yearly intervals on January 1 thereat- ` refers dmpare the index of cost of living and other appropriate r , professional level surveys of cos: levels. It is r intended that the above rates be modified as reflected in the above referenced indices and surveys. This must ue mutually agreeable to both parties and any modification shall ba reduced to writing and made an addendw: to this contract. fir. y PACE 3 • LUTZ. DAILY a BRAIN coNlVL'r1N0 LNOINaa11w C. Payments to the Engineer as defined by the method of compensation in this Section shall be made by the city within 30 days after receipt by the City of invoices from the Engineer provided that the invoices are detailed and accurate. This provision will not hold fot invoices in question that are improperly prepared. SECTION III. It is further agreed thats A. The work herein will not include test borings, property line sur- veys, material tests, or asbestos survey and removal in areas which would affect construction. These services shell be con- tracted for by the City. 8. When the work involves construction of facilities, the Engineer shall make periodic visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to observe the progress and quality of the executed work and to determine in general if the work is pro- ceeding in accordance with the contract documental he will not be required tc make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the work; he will not be respon- sible for and will not have control or charge of construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or the safety precautions and programs in connection with the work; he will endeavor to guard the City against d•fecte and deficiencies j _ in the work of the contractor, but he will not be responsible for the contractor's failure to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documental and during such visits and on the basis of s his on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, he will keep the Owner informed of the progress of the work. f~ C. The Engineer will not be responsible for nor have control or charge over the acts or omissions of any contractor, any subcon- tractor or any of the contractor's or subcontractors agents or employees or any other person (except his own employees and agents) at the Project site or otherwise performing any work of the Project. i t. 0. Because the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, mater- tale or equipment, or over the contractor's differing methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions or other factors, the estimates of construction cost i provided for herein are for informational purposes, are not guar- antees and bids or construction coati may exceed such estimates. „ E. The Engineer will cooperate with the Owner in furnishing necessary engineering information to the owner so that the Owner can submit all necessary applications to secure the proper permits required, in the work which has previously been described. PACE 4 a LUTZ, OAILV A BRAIN CONeVLTI010 eNOIN4E1!• F. The Engineer will make an initial interpretation of the terms and conditions of the, contract documents and he will be the impartial judge of the performance of the Owner and the contractors there- under. ' G. Neither the Engineer's authority to act under these provisions nor any decision made by him in good faith either to exercise or not exercise such authority shall give rise to any duty or responsi- bility of the Engineer to contractor, any subcontractor, supplier or manufacturerp any of their agents or employees, or any other person performing any of the work. H. The duties, responsibilities and the limitation of the authority of the Engineer as the Owner's consultant shall not be modified or extended without written consent of the Owner and the Engineer. 1. The Engineer shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of 1 any kind whatsoever occasioned by any error, omission or negligent act of Engineer, its officers, agents employees, invitees and other persons for whom it is legallyliable, with regard to the j performance of this agreement, and En sneer will$ at its cost and expensep defend and protect the City of Denton against any And all such clsims and demands. i. The Engineer will not discriminate against any employee or appli- cant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability or national origin. The Engineer will take affirmative action so that applicants are employed, and that employees are r I treated during employment without regard to their race, color, ,e religion, sex, age disability or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the £ollowingi employment, upgradingp demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment adver- tising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensationp and selection for training, including apprentice- ship. The engineer will post in conspicuous placed, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth tb.t provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. K, in the event that the City desires additional work, the Engineer shall give the Owner an estimate of the cost of services requested before performing the services. The Engineer shall not exceed this estimated coat for these services by more than 15 percent until the Owner has reviewed the work thus far completed and au- thorised the charge for additional work. In the event the Owner does not grant such authorisation, the Engineer shall not be obli- gated to perform further services. L, The Engineer shall perform Designated Services as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly PAGE 5 LUTZ, OAILY st BRAIN CONlU~T~NO tN01Nta11! progress of the work. Engineer shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily provided by a professional engineer under similar circumstances. The Engineer shall- submit for the City's approval a time' dch-idule for the performance of the Engineer's services which shall be adjusted as required as the Project proceeds, and shall include allowances for periods of time required for the City's review and approval of submissious and for approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. This time schedule, when approved by the City, shall be adhered to by the Engineer, except for delays not caused by the Engineer. M. The Agreement may be terminated by the City at any date or time, upon written notice of 60 days given by the Owner and delivered to the Engineers by U.S. Registered Mail, or return receipt and post- age prepaid, addressed to the Engineer at their principal place of business, 6400 Glenwood, Overland Park, Kansas 662020 of the City's intention to so terminate the services of such Engineer= and upon payment to the Engineer of any sums due for services authorized and performed by them, as set forth above in this con- tract up to and k,•:- ~i' including the date of written notice of termina- tion. N. Further, the within Agreement may be terminated by the Engineer at any date or time upon prior written notice of 60 days to the Owners by U.S. Registered Mails return receipt and postage pre- I• ? paid, delivered to the Owner at its administrative office, pre- sently located at the Municipal Buildings 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas 76201. The City agrees to pay promptly to Engineer upon receipt of iuch written notice of termination by the Engineer any and all susas due to the Engineer for services, expenses and other costs incurred by the Engineer as hereinabove provided for in this Agreement. .I 1• 1 ? I I 1 I . " F. PACE 6 I I 3 4 1 i LUTZ. OAILY ` BRAIN CCNsv LTINO [NOINyaRe f. C IN WITNESS wURBOF, the Parties have hereunto set their hands and r seals on the date first above written. k CITY OF DENTONI,TEXAS By_ RAY STEPHENS, OR ATTEST: t JENNIFER WALTERS ACTING CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH9 CITY ATTOPNEY P' CITY OF DMONI TEXAS BY: LUTZp DAILY 6 BRAIN III i j CONSULTING 4ENGINnEE By DAITNER J F. By FRED J. LUTZs .E.9 TNER L { r , r' f w PACE J 1 T ,r EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES July 22, 1987 7. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ~dTt CITY OF DENTON AND EVTT- D BRAIN III ! ENGINEERING R TTVE DATE. eas ty toy or entry eat ng oo ng ant for City Hall Complex Buildings.) Nelson presented district heating/cooling concept for City Hall complex that might include other buildings. Presently, the City Hall, Civic Center and Library have a central chiller for cooling, 9nd each building utilizes f electric resistance for heating. The central chiller Is nearly 20 years old and is in need of replacement as soon j as possible. Electric resistance hest is a very costly method of heating the City facilities. One of the basic ppolicies of the Utility Dep%rtment is to explore methods by which the Utilities could be a full service energy supplier, The City and Utility Staff believe that a central heating and cooling project for the City complex facilities would be an excellent opportunity to begin i developing the energy services concept and, at the same time, help the city save money. r+ Lutz, Daily and rain have submitted a proposal to evaluate the economics of this project. The cost for this evaluation is $19,000. Thompson indicated he would like the Woman's Building, Included within this plan, along with the Sr. Citizens Center. After further discussion, Thompson made a motion to recommend to the City Council passage of subject ordinance. Second by Frady. All ayes, no nayes motion carried. , R I ,n i DATE: August 4, 1987 CITY COUNCIL WC NDA ITEM T0: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER CONTRACT TO TEMPORARILY REDUCE KW DEMAND. E RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of July 22, j 1987, recoma,ended to the City Council approval of proposed contract to temporarily reduce KW demand. j SUMMARY: t The purpose of this contract is to reduce the on-peak summer load. An improvement in the system load factor will reduce the fixed costs from Texas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA). A reduction in the summer peak demand will improve the system load factor. Therefore, methods to accomplish the above were analysed. The result is the attached contract. ` General terms and conditions of the contract are as follows: o The contract is on a voluntary basis and is available to up to twenty-four customers who can reduce their demand KW by a minimum of 100 KW. K o Months affected are August and September 1987 o The peak hours are defined as from two PM to seven PM Monday through Friday. 9 o Customers will continue to be billed in the same manner and rate they are currently billed, but will receive a credit on their October 1987 electric bill in the amount of $12 for every demand KW they reduce. o The City and the Customer will agree upon an estimated demand for the months of August and September. o The City will monitor its system load and notify the customer by 12 noon of the day the customer needs to put this reduction into effect, It then becomes the responsibility of the customer to reduce their demand according to contractural arrangements. rt i o cThe ustomerl mewill ter to determine the reduction KW demand. The plan is to contact approximately twenty-four ' customers with a total load reduction of approximately five megawatts. An improvement in the system load factor by reducing the peak demand will reduce the monthly billings from TMPA 1 for the 1988 fiscal year. f BACKGROUND: The City's peak load during the summer months will i determine the portion during fixed will have to pay g substantial savings could result. Therefore, reducing the peak load during the 1987 summer months will benefit The City will have the the customers and the City alike. benefit f customorsowilloreceive i x an immediate f(October.987)lcredit € on their electric bill, S ' PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton, Utility Administration, Customer Service, Data Processing, and the citizens. i' FISCAL IMPACT: n ~ This project is anticipated to save the City approximately $128 per KW per year. This savings will be in the form of a reduction in the fixed charges on the TMPA billings. t Respectfully submitted, 1( 4Manager 1 ~r y , Prepared by Approved b . xecut ve rector a son, Department of Utilities f EXHIBIT I Draft Contract 11 Minutes PUB 7122187 1 3 I ~ 1899L No. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS WITH ELECTRIC UTILITY CUSTOMERS TO REDUCE ELECTRICAL POWER DEMAND; AUTHORIZING CREDITS ON UTILITY BILLS FOR CUSTOMERS WHO EXECUTE SUCH CONTRACTS; AND PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SIHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby finds that the reduction of consumption of peak electric power serves a public purpose by allowing the City to postpone the construction of additional generation facilities; and j WHEREAS, the City Council, acting upon the recommendation of City staff and the Public Utility Board, desires to reduce electrical power demand by the customers of the City of Denton Utilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the offering of electric utility bill credit incentives to customers who agree to reduce peak demand upon request by the City would reduce electric demand and the efficient utilization of the City's existing electric t power utility system would be enhanced; NOW, THEREFORE, Ir THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HERESY JRDAINS: ,y SECTION I. That the city council hereby authorizes the City Manager to establish a program tc provide electric utility bill a incentives at a rate of twelve d>ilars per kw demand to City of Denton customers who execute contracts authorizing the city to interrupt power under the terms and conditions set forth in the C contracts, the program being authorized for the months of August 4 and September of each year. rrti SECTION it, That the Executive Director of Electric r Utilities is hereby authorized to execute such contracts on behalf of the City. y, ve i. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. 15 _ rAx ° PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1981. RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR a r;' ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTFRS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED A3 TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHr CITY ATTORNEY BY:.C v y N rn qq n A ~:1Fi~.~. gJ v t'~ir a r. r , r ' r rr i F ' F ~l r t e ' 1 l ~~f r I ~g~gyy• ~ ~ C i P i lr 1 a r~~K psi'' ! '%I a r `l k.na + 1 ''r j o 1 e 'i{iM ~.AtWxr„w. i I a~alu,o'176? A . DRAFT CONTRACT THE STATE OF TEXAS i COUNTY OF DENTON KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: J TEMPORARY REDUCTION IN DEMAND The City of Denton, Texas, ■ Municipal Home Rule City situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "CITY", acting herein by and through its City Manager, and , whose address Is ere na er ca a USTOIV , hereby mutually agree as o ow$; I. APPLICATION OF CONTRACT; ?his contract is applicahle to any customer w o rrceTyes service during the months of August and September 1987, and is, by written agreement, provided service subject to load reductions of a minimum of one-hundred XW (1000) upon two hours notification by telephone by the City. 2, SI0VIrE`, TO BE PERFORMED: The City has an Interest In ru17,g tile system pea KW in order to effect a lover billing cost from Texas Munlct sI Power Agency and is witlin8 and agrees to pay CUSTOMER as follows: i a) CUSTOMER will receive twelve (~12.00J dollars per kw demand for a reduction of at least one-hundred XW (100 KW) during the months of August and September 19871 b) The C17Y has determin#J the peak loads at the Customer's address t0 b• As follows: Peak Demands KW Address: 1. CITY and CUSTOMER HEREBY ACRFE AS FOLLOWSr A. CITY agrees to monitor its syster lpad and determine If A reduction In peak KK Is required. CITY shall notify CUS70NFR by twelve noon If such II reduction is. required. CUSTOMER shill reduce I their toad for that day between the hours of two a PM and seven PM, b. CUSTOMER agrees to acknowledge such request and reduce their load according to this contract. 2. GENERAL BILLING INPORMATIONI CUSTOMER will be charged +ecor n o Tt-e careen rite schedule applicable to the CUS~OMER'S CLASS for the mont'ns of Au ust And September 1087. A credit shalt be appplied to CUSTOMER'S October 1987 bill calculated as followsi Peak KW demand Aug/Sop 1017 LESS Has demand during reduction T~KW p. , Total Demand keduction 91 1111 r " a 11.00 Total Credit: S, tL as lE I , S. DErINITIONSi Peek Hours end Peak Days: Peak hours are from two PM to seven :00 PM). Peak days are Monday through Friday. Peak Xr Demand Au /Se t 1987: The actual or estimated pees 1 usage, w clever s ;realer, for the months of August and September 1981 based on historlcal billing records plus estimates of changes 1P load, equipment, etc. Maximum Demand Ourin Reduction: Nu lmum (or peak] demand at occurre ur ng any reduction requested by the City. Demand Reductions Peak Xx demand less maximum demand ng re uct on. G S. TEAM OF CONTRACTS This contract Is In effect for the period o .u gust 1 to August 31, 191' and September 1 through September 10, 1987. EXECUTED THIS DRY OF ^_r 1961. CUSTOMER CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ~ r7, f %a me BTs CITY MANAM F rasa t `y Y t p ti one humble Y Ss ATTESTt 1 44 CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS " APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM 7 - 4 ~pR ar~ ~ ft ITC1 ` r` CITY OF,DENTON, TEXT EY S t N+ .1i 4 r ~ Y 1 f • ~ . - v;,A.o a':-f:»a k'r.;m, rib -,,.~u. n....r c f'IflbS .r .,L.M',4av r n EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTFS July 22, 1987 11. CONSIDER CONTRACT TO TEMPORARILY REDUCE KW DEMAND Nelson reviewed this item with a short discussion of current TMPA charges. The purpose of this contract is to reduce the on-peak summer load. An improvement in the system load factor will reduce the fixed costs from Texas Municipal Power Agency {TMPA}. A reduction in the summer peak demand will improve the system load factor. Therefore, methods to accomplish the above were analyzed. The result is the subject contract. General terms and conditions of the contract are as follows: o The contract is on a voluntary basis and is 4 available to up to twenty-four customers who can reduce their demand KW by a minimum of 100 hW. o Months affected are August and September 1987 t o The peak hours are defined as from two PM to sevem PM Monday through Friday. o Customers will continue to be billed in the same r manner and rate they are currently billed, but will receive a credit on their October 1987 electric bill in the amount of $12 for every demand KW they reduce, o The City and the Customer will agree upon an estimated demand for the months of August and September. R" o The City will monitor its system load and notify the customer by 12 noon of the day the customer needs to ' put this reduction into effect. It then becomes the responsibility of the customer to reduce their demand according to contractural arrangements. ' o The City will have recording instruments on the customer meter to determine the reduction in LW demand. The plan is to contact approximately twenty-four customers with a total load reduction of approximately five megawatts. An improvement in the system load factor by reducing the peak demand will reduce the monthly billings from TMPA for the 1988 fiscal year. The City's peak load during the summer months will determine the portion of TMPA's fixed costs that the City will have to pay during the next fiscal year. A substantial savings could result. Therefore, reducing the peak load during the 1987 summer months will benefit the customers and the City alike. The CI benefit of lower fixed costs from TMPAilwhilee the customers will receive an immediate (October 1987) credit on their electric bill. This project is anticipated to save the City approximately $128 per SW per year. This savings will be in the form of a reduction in the fixed charges or the TMPA billings. i Chew made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of review. Second the cThompson, with yes, no nayespamotion carried, , I M J"If' I r r f, IiC J f' fl 1 4, JAI K r .1 L r ~a r , } DATE: 08104/81 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT /"/y~ / JT' TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. H%rrell, City Manager SUBJECT: SET TIME, DATE AND PLACE FOR POSSIBLE ANNEXATION OF 24.39 ACRES LOCATED IN THE B. BURLESON SURVEY NO. 65 AND THE J. AYERS SURVEY NO. 2 AND SITUATED NEST OF I-35 AT AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF RECTOR ROAD. (A-50) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the city Council consider Betting August 18 and 25 as the public hearing dates. SUMMARY: ! The property is within the extraterritorial jurisdiction but a section will be annexed upon completion of I-35 N annexation of a 500 foot strip. The property is the site of a proposed batch plant. If the property is annexed, it would be consistent with our policy to protect the City's interest in development. BACKGROUND: t The property is removed by a considerable distance from an urbanized area. Water and sewer lines are currently not anticipated to be w extended until 2000 by tht City of Denton. I-35 to being repaved by the State Highway Depar~ment. The major concerns are land use control, aesthetic quality, and relation to the community. The land use would be in conflict with the Denton Development Guide. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFBGT8V k All departments involved in the development process, the land owner, 1 and proposed developer. R Y ~ y ~ IMPACT= . NF t, At this time, tare protection would be the main concern. It a ;a building is constructed prior to annexation the costs involved would increase to provide City Services to the property. { ~y Reap fully submitted= r a a fel Prepared bye CL y Manager U Cecile Carson „ Urban Planner k }F Approved: 0~,• David Ellison k Aoting Director for 23g2g I Planning and Development ~thV y.. a " l 1872L NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON FEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of , 1987, at 7:00 o'clocW_F_._R. t n the City Council Cham a_rs__oTT Municipal Build- ing of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. On the day of , 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the City ouncil Cham ersof-t:Te Frunicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giv- ing all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION 11. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby w " ? author z-T e3 and directed to cause notice of such public hearings to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the territory described in Exhibit "A" not more than twenty days nor less than ten days prior to the date of such ublic hearings, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. 'this ordinance shall be in full force and effect imee at31 elyTMowing its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1987. 1I RAY TSTEPHENS, MAYOR a 1 ATTEST: ' UbNNIFbR w ' CITY SECRETARY ` APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i BYs ~ A-50 ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of a tract of land as conveyed from S.R. Rector, et ux to S.D. Rector by deed recorded in volume 247, Page 410 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, same being part of Lot 1, Block A of the Rector Subdivision, an addition to the County of Denton, and also being part of the J. Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 2, and part of the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract No. 65, and more fully described as follows: i BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established in the tract described in Ordinance No. 87- , said point lying 2S0.0 feet west of and perpendicular to Me-centerline of 1H 35, said point also lying in the centerline of an east-west county road known as Rector Road; THENCE south 820 00' 00" west along said centerline of Rector Road a distance of 1033.58 feet to a nail for corner; THENCE north 070 28' 00" west passing at 40.0 feet an iron rod 1 ing in the north right-of-way line of said Rector Road, some being the southwest corner of said Lot 1, Block A of the Rector Subdivision, passing at 150.0 feet, more or less, the I north boundary line of said J. Ayers survey, same being the Ij south boundary line of said B. Burleson survey and continuing for a total distance of 620.68 feet to an iron rod for corner, I said point being the northwest corner of said Lot 10 Block A of Tw said subdivision; I! THENCE north 080 west a distance of 379.35 feet to a point x for a corner, said point lying 1000.0 feet north of And perpendicular to the centerline of said Rector (toad; ` tr t, t ` THENCE north 820 east 1000.0 feet north of and parallel to i~ i; the centerline of said Rector Road a distance of 1093.96 feet to a point for corner lying in the present city limits, said point also lying 250.0 feet west of and perpendicular to said j' centerline of said 1H 35; It,t,THENCE south 40 12' 54" past (by ordinance south 20 50' east) along the present city limits passing at 482.71 feet, the III northeast boundary line of said Lot 1, and continuing for a total distance of 1002.19 feet to the place of Boginning and containing 24.3957 acres of land, more or less. xr 41 r h d a. , p 1t r+ '~n 1872L NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1981, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C tf y council Cam ers o t e M`nicipal Building of the City of Denton. Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and glace all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in tht things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. ' A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , z 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P, M. in the City Council C am ers o the + Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and t , & place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. t y RAY Ii. 9 MAYOR k 1 "A r, ATTEST w. ai fo,s7ENNIFER'WALTIR'Sj CITY MUM e ~ A-SO .f A-SU ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel 1f land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of a tract of land as conveyed from S.R. Rector, et ux to S.U. Rector by deed recorded in Volume 247, Page 41U of the Geed Records of Denton County, Texas, same being part of Lot 11 Block A of the Rector Subdivision, an addition to the County of Uenton, and also being part of the J. Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 2, and part of the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract No. b5, and more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established in the25Otract .0 feet e west described and perpendicular to Me-centerline i lying of { 1H 35, said point also lying in the centerline of an east-west county road known as Rector Road; said of kector THoENCE south a distance 2 of west R THENCE north U70 28' 0U" west passing at 40.0 feet an iron rod lying in the north right-of-way line of said Rector Road, f same being the southwest corner of said Lot 1, Block A of the kector Subdivision, passing at 150.U feet, more or less, the north boundary line of said J. Ayers survey, same being the south boundary line of said b. burleson survey and continuing for a total distance of b20,bb feet to an iron rod for corner, said point being the northwest corner of said Lot 1, block A of said subdivision; THENCE north 080 west a distance of 379.35 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying IUUU.U feet north of and . perpendicular to the centerline of said Rector Road; THENCE north 820 east 1000.0 feet north of and parallel to y the centerline of said Rector Road a distance of 1093.9b feet to a point for corner lying in the present city limits, said point also 1 ing 250.0 feet west of and perpendicular to said ~w y centerline of said 1H 35; THENCE south 40 12' 54" east (by ordinance south 20 So' F, east) along the present city limits passing at 482.71 feet, the northeast boundary line of said Lot 1, and continuing for a total distance of 1002.19 feet to the Place of Begin.iing and ` containing 24,39S7 acres of land, more or less. 11 Y 4 e 1 I Duck ~ C r eek~ Ivan . Rd "•£G NI C i o o t r R d R o t o~~ v s• N ~ ~ I V 't, S C ~ ON S`• 1 MDOte a y,. . v s M I s m R d. * zsr=IS eJ lit i~ 8Iu ~0und • i ~js11a'N. • 1 . ~ ' ,mss! ~4tiY fh•~,. ~ i~• 18961, NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PROJECT ENGAGEMENT LETTER WITH WOODe LUCKSINGER 6 EPSTEIN FOR PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves and auth- orizes the Mayor to execute the agreement between the City of Denton and Wood, Lucksinger 6 Epstein to provide legal services, under the terms and conditions contained in said project engage- ment letter which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, SECTION II. That this ordinance shall becL,ne effective immediately ely upon its passage and approval, sF PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987, ~ r ' RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR '4A1 1 W ATTESTt • IIJ ! r, JENNIFER WALTERS$ CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i f BYt irc J• r <<r ! ~ i il yy 3 +sa 1 L - l i 1/80NHP WOOD, LUCKSINGER & EPSTEIN PROJECT ENGAGEMENT LETTER Date: Slle: 2-1 Dear Client: You bavG requested that we provide consultation services to you on certain matters and have informed us either that you have not retained the services of another attorney for such matters, or that your request has been made with the consent of such other attorney, This Letter Agreement is our customary method of confirming the standard terms upon which our services are provided. (1 1. Retention of Firm. PiL mil ("Client") has testeined the firm of flood, uckatrig er d Epstein ( Firm ) to provides consultation services directly and through associated offices in accordance with the following terms, This Letter Agreement replaces all prior agreements, between the parties. 2. Engagement Deposit, Client will initially deposit with Fim the sum of $;,00o or $ which shall be retained by Firv and applied against the last invoice rendered hereunder (with any excess being refunded at Client's direction after the termination of the engagement). This deposit represents neither a "minimum" fee nor an "estimate" of the fee which the engagement may entail. This deposit f 0all be subject to increase in the event of dny significant expansion in the scope of the services requested by Client from Firm. { 3. Fees and Expenses. ! 3.1 Fees. Client will compensate Firm based on (a) Firm's projeot engagement standard hourly rates for those personnel performing the specific services required for Client and (b) such additional applicable factors, if any, as ar2 provided in the Code of Professional Responsibility (e.g. special time 11mi- tations imposed by Client or the circumstances of the project, the apparent likelihood that the performance of the project will preclude other employment by Firm, etc.) but not less than an average of one hundred dollars per month during each calendar year of this engagement. Firm shall record time to the nearest one-tenth hour invested in providing services to Clients including travel time. 3.2 Expenses. Client will reimburse Firm for out-oC-pocket expenses reasonably incurred in performance of services for Client (e.g, long distance telephones delivery, copying, clerical overtimes coats, fees, travel, etc.). 4. Pa ants. Periodically (e.g. monthly or at other intervals determined by Firm), Firm will submit to Client an invoice for fees and expenses. Invoice amounts shall be paid within fifteen days of date; thereafter, any unpaid balance will bear r, interest at the highest rate permitted by law. } III With each invoice Firm customarily provides a brief unedited computer summary of services rendered. Upon advance written request, Firm will make a good faith effort to provide a more detailed delineation of services (by date, by project and/or by type of service - e.g. review of Client documents, factual research, legal research, drafting, negotiation, presentation, etc.) at an additional charge to Client btoed on the preparation time re;uired. 5. Termination, limitations and Assignment. This Letter Agreement may be prospectively terminated at any time upon reasonable written notice given by either party. Client also agrees that Firm shall be under no obligation to undertake or continue services on any project (a) if Firm deems such services to be in conflict with the interests. of another client or with legal ethics or (b) if Client shall fail to make any pa)ment to Firm when due. Upon termination of the engagement and the satisfaction by Client of all prior financial obligations, Firm will, at its standard hourly rates, (i) search its files and forward to Client, or counsel designated by Client, copies of such significant original documents, if soy, specified and previously entrusted to Fird ky Client, (it) take such steps as it deems appropriate to formally withdraw from su,h proceedings, if any, in which it may be counsel of record, and (iii) provide reasonable transitional assistance to new counsel, if any, designated by Client. lr This Letter Agreement and all rights and obligations thereunder shall be assignable by Firm to any entity which succeeds in whole or in part to the professional activities now conducted by Firm. ti. Special Provisions. HONE. r 1 6 1 1} I Y. T ~ M1 1 I 11 S - e 1 Y y, . 1 1 I ACCEPTED FOR CLIENT WOOD, LUCKSINGER 6 EPSTEIN BY: Authorised Official Authorised Official i 1 i AID h DATE% 08/04/87 1 i CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT F. A. T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council 1 FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: SET TIM30 DATE AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF A 9.2154 ACRE TRACT BEING PART OF THE J. EARLY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1279, AND THE MOREAU FOAREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 4170 AND BEING LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MINGO ROAD AND NORTH COOPER CREEK ROAD. JA-47) RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends August 18 and August 25 as the dates for the public hearings. A special called meeting has been scheduled for August 25 to institute three annexations. I SUMMARY: , ° A voluntary request for annexation has been submitted by the owner, i Donald R. Curtis. The purpose for annexation Is to permit the development of the property and a zoning request and preliminary plat have been submitted. ra BACKGROUND: The property is vacant rt this time. Safety Kleen and the Green ~i Giant distribution cents are located to the south and the Cooper ; Creek Baptist Church is located west. A sanitary sewer line is d located in North Cooper Creek Road. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: +r n All depactme,ato involved in the development process and the land owner. FISCAL IMPACT!" City services would be extended to the property, if annexed, but because of the existing City facilities and no existing structures' on the property the impact should be minimal. fi ~ r a F' Reap ully submit ed: 1 nr~; ! I ..3r S ZZ ovirariell City Manager Prepared by: R { r 1 Asa Cecile Carson i r Urban Planner t App oved: ~David Ellison Acting Director for Planning and Development 23899 r e 1881L rt RESOLUTION NO. f A RESOLUTION SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT r'A" ATTACHED HERETO BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. That on the day of , 1987, at 7:00 oo cT. M. in the City- ouncil Chambers Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. That on the day of , 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the City Council Chambers o the Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing E giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION It. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authori: and directed to cause notice of such public hearings to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the territory described in Exhibit "A" not more than twenty days nor less thhn ten days prior to the date of such 4 public hearings, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987. IA, v. 'y RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR ATTEST: j JhNNIFhK a 5-0-CTTY =C+TARY I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I x II i Jr ~ r PY: E i EXHIBIT "A" ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the J. Early survey, Abst. No. 1279, and part of the Moreau Forrest survey, Abst. No. 417, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed from D. 0. Jones and Shirley Jean Jones Catter to Dan Christie, Don Curtis, and Bob Houser by deed dated March 13, 1985 and recorded in Volume 1724, Page 84 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point lying in the present city limits, said present city limits established by Ordinance No. 65-43, Tract 1, said point also lying in the south right-of-way line of the Texas $ Pacific Railroad, and the west boundary line of said M. Forrest survey, same being the east boundary line of said J. Early survey; THENCE North along said present city limits and said survey lines, passing at S3.90 feet, more or less, the centerline of said T. $ R. R. continuing for a total distance of 107.80 feet to a point lying in the north right-of-way line of said T. & P. R. R., same being the south right-of-way line of a northeast-southwest public road known as Mingo Road for corner; { THEN.,E north 00 21117" east along the east boundary line of said J. Early survey, same being the west boundary line of said M. Forrest survey, passing at 64.85 feet the north right-of-way line of said Mingo Road, continuing and along the centerline of a north-south public road known as Cooper Creek Road, a distance of j' 785.87 feet to an iron pin, same being the northwest corner of said M. Forrest survey, said point also lying at an ell corner of j t said Cooper Creek Road f ' THENCE north 890 1S' 12" east along the north boundary line of j ` said M. Forrest survey, same Lein the centerline of the east-west portion of said Cooper~ Creek Road, passing the intersection of the centerline of said Cooper Creek Road and the centerline of an east-west county road, continuing and along the centerline of said county road a distance of S75.1 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE south 20 26' east, passing at 19.83 feet the northeast corner of said tract, same being a fence corner po3t, continuing along the northerly east boundary line of said tract, a total distance of 260.55 feet to the easterly southeast corner of said j tract; j THENCE south 730 58' SS" west along the northerly southeast boundary line of said tract, a distance of 160.94 feet to an Inner ell corner of said tract; i • A-47 1171 's t 1 . } t S i THENCE south 020 3S' 3S" east along the westerly east boundary line of said tract a distance of 244.03 feet to the westerly southeast corner of said tract, same being the north right-of-way line of said Mingo Road; THENCE south 210 $6' 12" east, passing at 60.0 feet the south right-of-way line of said Mingo Road, same being the North right- of-way line of said T. 6 P. R. R., passing at 110.0 feet the centerline of said railroad, continuing for a total distance of 160.0 feet to a point lying in the south right-of-way line of said railroad for corner; l n THENCE south 680 03' 48" west along the south right-of-way line k w_ of said T. $ P. R. R., a distance of S46,67 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 9.2154 acres of land, more or less. J 1 l V r {t k,f ~ ~L". 9 e L1 f i e a t k a ° f Id 1 r at I Yi { ci P ~e f 1 kt~yr! •r !J k' f j I C~:I a S nA I. A-47 't. t ,P V J. i {I Y f 1881L NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: 1 The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation i proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the territory described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorr•.irated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the City of Denton. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City Council C am ers o t Fe Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of t 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the C try Council C am ers o t Fe Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be `,5 heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons the things and matters herein mentioned, will taknoticerested in RA S EPHENS, MAYOR d ~ y x 1 + {a ATTEST: Y 'f S J JENNIFER LTERS, CITY SECRETARY J • e r r i~ ( t A-47 ~ L EXHIBIT "A" ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the J. Early survey, Abst. No. 1279, and part of the Moreau Forrest survey, Abst. No. 417, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed from D. 0. Jones and Shirley Jean Jones Catter to Dan Christie, Don Curtis, and Bob Houser by deed dated March 13, 1985 and recorded in Volume 1724, Page 84 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point lying in the present city limits, said present city limits established by Ordinance No. 6S-43, Tract 1, said point also lying in the south right-of-way line of the Texas 6 Pacific Railroad, and the west boundary line of said M. Forrest survey, same being the east boundary line of said J. Early survey; M I i THENCE North along said prese,,t city limits and said survey lines, passing at 53.90 feet, more or less, the centerline of said T. & P. R. R. continuing for a total distance of 107.80 feet to a point lying in the north right-of-way line of said T. 6 P. R. R., same u being the south right-of-way line of a northeast-southwest public i road known as Mingo Road for corner; THENCE north 00 21917" east along the east boundary line of said J. Early survey, same being the west boundary line of said M. r Forrest survey, passing at 64,85 feet the north right-of-way line of said Mingo Road, continuing and along the centerline of a ' north-south public road known as Cooper Creek Road, a distance of 785.87 feet to an iron pin, same being the northwest corner of said M. Forrest survey, said point also lying at an ell corner of said Cooper Creek Road • j r THENCE north 890 1S' 12" east along the north boundary line of f said M. Forrest survey, same being the centerline of the east-west portion of said Cooper Creek Road, passing the intersection of the centerline of said Cooper Creek Road end the centerline of an east-west county road, continuing and along the centerline of said {,z county road a distance of 575.1 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE south 20 26' east passing at 19.83 feet the northeast corner of said tract, same being a fence corner post, continuing along the northerly east boundary line of said tract, a total distance of 260.55 feet to the easterly southeast corner of said tract; Y !r Y h ~ 9 THENCE south 730 58' S5" west along the northerly southeast boundary line of said tract, a distance of 160.94 feet to an inner ell corner of said tract; A-47 a i THENCE south 020 35' 3S" east along the westerly east boundary line of said tract a distance of 244,03 feet to the westerly southeast corner of said tract, same being the north right-of-way line of said Mingo Road; THENCE south 210 S6' 1211 east, passing at 60.0 feet the south right-of-way line of said Mingo Road, same being the North right- I of-way line of said T. B P. R. R., passing at 110,0 feet the s centerline of said railroad, continuing for a total distance of 160.0 feet to a point lying in the south right-of-way line of said railroad for corner; THENCE south 680 03' 48" west along the south right-of-way line of said T. 6 P. R. R., a distance of 546.67 feet to the Place of i Beginning and containing 9.2154 acres of land, more or less. sue' .~/fir i. 1 • f r` ;r MIA x b~~! ~ r: n JF T~ v c 1 ra nhh:.k Fly I ~ ~ :hY 4~ M a 1Cd~~ t x - It , ♦ 9 y i J 4 r Fr ~ , a , y , 1 1F 1 1 I I i f ~M l rt 5! i t j A-47 t ~ 3.a s. I .Y - nr-.+.-.~~~,.~.. .,............mr. vMkoa..WM1aYMrm4:..wYww.. 1 ` r i 'r f ~ Ac V 1 ~47 r Ito i r PO 18~ L I A lot • A f r•----- _ i 1 P"4 r ~ Fa _ ; r r r r _O I Q ~ S•5 ; SF-10 - r S-126 34 PD-73 r ~ r t r: az R A s i . i..: 19 N_ I VI I I y AGENDA ADDENDUM C11'Y OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL 04 'August 4, 1987 a 7:00 p.m. .Q 1. Receive i, report from Dr, Richard Simms and Dr. Jim Riggs regarding traffic safety at the intersection of Southridge Drive and Lillian Miller Parkway. 2. Consider adoption of an ordinance t) provide for an effective date of September 1S, 1987 for the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code. Y, 1 C E R T I F I C A T E i I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin b r at tie Ci H 11 of the City of .Denton, Texas cr. on the day of 1987 o'clock C IT t: FAR T 161 4 Xv1, Jy~'`1 1 v , t I 1 1 r Ir 1 S j x S N7. Y~ 5 ~ t ` rr;1 a{r,fiQ in'S. ! r IL .r/ - t ~ a'.TL.1}'. .MAX. giT:M~:IM " ~v ltd ,1, 1. j 1 AGENDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COi1NCIL n August 4, 1987 7:00 p.m. 1. Receive a report from Dr. Richard Simms and Dr. Jim Riggs regarding traffic safety at the intersection of r Southridge Drive and Lillian Miller Parkway. 2. Consider adoption of an ordinance to provide for an effective date of September 15, 1987 for the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code. } S xY C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Nall of the City of Denton, Texas, i t $ + r?t~ on the day of , 11,087 at o'clock ' (a.m.} p.m. r ' t v ar 27170 it ls "r . r rx, , r ~ .r A r , . S 9, j' o+ si- t ~ r { t# kxh x ,p/~ " r .~5 . r w ire, r s f i. 1903E NO. _ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 87-127 PROVIDING FOR A NEW EFFECTIVE DATE FOR 'I IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLUMBING CODES AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section IV of Ordinance No. 87-127, passed and approves -by the Denton City council on July 211 1987, is hereby amended as follows: That this ordinance shall become effective on September ;i 15, 1987. SECTION Ii. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteens days from the date of its passage, and the City ; Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the city of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1987. 1 RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR h ATTEST: I, JENNIFER ALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY k I", t } i Y • V i , CITY ofVENTONiTEXAS MUNICIPAI BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 70201 /TELEPHONE (017)568-9307 011ICe of the Clfy Man119er M E M. O R A N D U M 11 T0: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager i FROM, Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATE: July 31, 1987 SUBJECT: PLUMBING CODS ORDINANCE n t~ "g'. '1i 4 ,11 ~+At the Council Meting on July 21, 19871 an ordinance was passed which would put the 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code into effect in the City of Denton. The effective date was scheduled ' to be August 41 1987. ' We have received negative input concerning this date and many suppliers have requested that this date be moved back. Due to this, we would like to request that the effective date be moved to September 15, 1987. If you or the Council have any further questions, 1 will be happy to try and answer them for you. I + t r /1 I~%~~1 te % c ve e Deputy City Manager s , , x 3571M , awn R r ' d 0+ itV ti' '~_a~vv Aeyc t1. ,47 • I}i L + tir jr U ~ i Y' ,Cr x ~I I I f w .4 , w i, <11 vl~ t, , ^ rn rr C2 OT A c n o ~n g ~ N V1 CO 3c m N k, 4 ~ ~ N ~ m v r u J Fn m ;o N m C r- C r- C) l ` V C C t.*TO~ yy H GA'f of 0 m z co m N G n z 1r~ O CO 70 z Vf n M LA 0 J m H nom M"l tt, CA z in m T t N N `I r~ yC n 1 00 M m o H N r 77 O r i ~ o v ~ 4 tvt~ i Cti 3 ~ 131 C cC ~ ~ C C7 O -C f O N Y N vtKl q R1 VII `y 111 y f \ ~ m ~ -i o r- "n • C ~ ~ f*1 QZ I- r9 ? og~ ' 03 rn Y LA n CSO y z 'osy ~ m u+ z v+ s ^ c 4 In f s C r' .fir t~ W = Fob N 70 r a 1 I rl ~ f s ~ • ' l Pf (r N r rm i c x n bf1 ~ ~ V N z c~ Ck) C On Q _ ~ 7 J/ ~f 9 _ m f J \ ` ~ fo zz i 17 1 ` ! m r ran 0 o F c S o m { C H ~1 ~ 2 A 7D C~ -1 0q c m z ` o g r$ m ~r o ~ y tA o M m m o . A 04 Ot LP 4 M Up NJ ~ z °Q v 4~ 0 W J x N ;'a e 3 ~ o I Z DA o rn N r rn r ~ T ;a (I t! # ~ 03 0 < Z g ZIP 5N a o n. Cc 4M Y. ~ L4 $ c 1 A ~A f r ~ j: M+ h w N M OA ~ 6` ~ I,,) d MCI rn V1 c y. H r TAZ z n r m o r rn z 0 co \ y a $ ~Illz A ~rn m g N p.1 m VV eo \ W -n i v W O W $ . n (L a- C ; M ~n a 1~ dc F -t r+ a ' r m r- 0 \ p m n N GI 4.1 rri x i b Y (V d N O o h L2 N m N b c A „ ,4 w ; I r -c n . VI N ~i N r ~4 m El k ~ ~ x ` t^ CA JZ1 ~ r N 1110 { iP AV 'Y . y r t,. ~ ° ` L,. ? .V:a •x. y ..SST. ~ ~ e ,e ~'!'4~' v A fl _ rn 0 m ~ n ~z m rn f Y r- rn Z: m v LA v LA In cXi °z r m • o n q 4 Q 71 a w ~ g h" O C P ~ C V Z~~ j l N = N i . rn w~ u SA 00 i a r~yr,l "Mq~ l I n A tZ r m zi IN ,n- r 41 S~ e R m I r1 r ~r rt ' 1 S An m 2 p ` ~ 2 I- rl T W r} yCy W rCry7~ ~ • z n rNi m o r N T N i r*~} r n \ r, ° r• -n ro $ W M Y j. m o n ' N n rn (i N C 7C y ,1 M ` 0 W M Z N o F pp N Z N O i N r -4 t7 r f H iq r 21 t; r ~ju rn m _ \ Z I \ l' m m r pn o .4 3c z ~ I ?L P 3! r- -M V L2 H A ~ O r Y ci %7 " v~ m y V a m r4 m I c 4 m 2 r J O ~ W O RIB ° VI 0 J•wl i z N LA o (A F i V t Q/\ o t~ - A s- { Ira r Q _a n * + r.' 1 y 2 VI r N P 1 P -4 ,a w r r W y s • r ~ y s r "A' r .s 1 iC i -1 M r ~ oitio N4 1 J ,ti • k v fr1 oQ ~ W W ~J ~N w ~ ce- u $ 00 • A i V rq o fl R~ o r o z 1' a a` r ~x .r+ mm y m r 1. O~ -U Ar. r m rm O 1 n M A n'1 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ c z 5 N W r m H m cy r z M g rn H m J z c~ r- C, w o XF m i 1 ~ O y Z M O 1 r/ O ~ 2 ! It.,. e ' O O N C N T O 2 13 14 ~4 C3 I I Pi ~ A ~ a 11 n V \ m it CA 2.1 (A ~n~ F C 0 N 'A "n m ~n y s y1 ^ rN- So '.D \ v ` yl + w A + I P} ~ ~ N $y r r I z ~ ~ O r f Vj: z { ttl ~t NN t tivt pt . IA LA + ) la^ f N I v ' V~~ O~'1 :~j C4 Ls O 140 U 1 I ~I a d \AN M r .A O O { ar.' W 1 5 . S~ • 3 y ` S _~._j V zr. m m mm r- rri O m C1 T ;o C H <Wo r" Z n Vf W E m a-~ \ f i r Z A rn A rn &I T t T m iA m m I 4 ' o n y r ° t ~ ~ \ \ G C r0 r1 , ~ m Z 1 y N K1 W ° m m C3 `t to o (1 r" C r n z a f to m N X O rS f 'y1 Q 0 X\j Iron Io n r~. 5 # z N O m f ` r S 3C p ' J ~ r- 9-1 v .t F 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'S' H i yc _ n m 6\ 1 ° ry If i J w s Co ~ N m ! v v Z \ m lc~ rm h ~i \ za m m r- rn 'n a c <wo k J" r- M C O N ^ ~j z ^ tn ca X: M ~ a m o r z ;o n M LA m m c x\11 \ \ A z ~l r o x r- m x m o P~- ` r a t o z °z n N n m IN, N ~ < m N C3 k In -4 ;o to -4 -4 ty f 71 o r m \ N 2 N ~ N aye' ~ ~ ; s ~ ~ o ~y7 yr w VI co ,a.s t ~ _ ~ ~ Fog 'y . 11 V1 rl 0 ~yc , ~ ~ ~ t 1 Z Fi ~ CA z v `~v 1 $ r1i ~'I Y m r 1 I O rr' r x 2 1 o 9m m n S J z n \ in co m m H m o r n i t. j 2 A L n 1 f 1 m vmi \ A c"~. \ A foil m r1 m n z Y gym= w o m z °m o { - b L m LA ~3 \ 1 1 ~J ~ o r ~ ~ sad A 7C vi m . ` 1 \ \ p Ny f ~I m r- "n Fib + r 70 H f" CIO m o ~1 jr: O mQZ ~ 1 0 1 N~\ Ll:l , f ~ vQ ~ ~ CL~ I~„ Jl rn, m ~ ~ yJ d v x M m r r S 1 n S2 2; r£i m r m m C-) pH co v < ~ f IA A ;o ;Q 0 rri J rri LA v a ~i m A .'L m o yy7O ~ ' o A ~ cn n m~ M m N O Vii n ~ Y -J NzLn n u o 4 y m 4 r- (A 'n h y. n r 70 N ° a t ai 14 m A a 1 j 4 3 G9 N r m r Ip, t , 1 m VV ~ ~ c, ~t~ sp m ~ 1 r 9 r o J x w m m r Ilk ~ r ap r Z: 0 54 -C # ! h, H a o !t Q r m i ~ \ ~ a z i 1 `A r m K c H n s~ s t ~ ~ ~ of w 7E m r rq CA 1 ^ a 'n m ni e, I r f ' m Ct \ A r d co t3 H Al' l[_ Lz~ m C ~ O A Z ' H o `a s f!f N d V U g x I of o ri \n \ J J H z Q/ 9 a y o n 3 4" v j ' O z I v H . ON (A m n~ p. n N m W ti 6~ x r A~ Y o C l~ W S W 9 ~ :0 m z 1 t 1 m v ~ t b ~ m ~n rrl 1 f1~. q. O i - 3 m rr- rho IT\ 1 { 3 o r x z f` r m In m C w m e g rl c n t p z n LA ca X: rn a m v r z rq A n rq CA n M n q z 2 N N z ron cti m °z co a rri MT Z Npp ny MA t. O y x -4 M G •r J CD K v $J m 0 y = Q m ° b o r- L2 z en z v+ ~n m r -n a I ~ r r -e n 0 r F -0 ~ a P ~ c 1 N a Ll CA N r 2 C O +7 R Ur ~ w ~1 ~ NCIO , ep ° YO N V m y DO N a r w~ F f - ~ ~ d b1 0 w b 4 . a N ~o h O 44 41 0. r` Y 1. '..I 464 00 6 V f\ V s` C1 a c l z a ~ m o • , V ~ ~ p • 3 tX4 { a O m x m r L4 O ~ m r r a d U) Az ra[ m o tt1 < 3 i D r. -I O Airs T r r s z m o m n < co ° < N K A n b 0 N C I 2-0 N W = fr1 O r 99 ►a 1 a p n rri t4 A .b rn m N m m W n z f o m N o c w d n v a °z N Cf rnn v .r rn N ° W p S z n i I;zb Q °-1m D O o rn . o~ ~ Z CA A 'rl r d m x, Dt IR 4 ~ 1'1 i 1 ~ .Y m N N N ' ~1 m e ~a r rn R W W w 14 v n prn f.A Gj O a' m TIN i t E A ~ IA y I E A~ 1 q 70 r I 1 1 al ~ n r ~ I 1 ZV'x Y i L,~Y1 fi 'I I 7 I 7 it 4 M, 1 .•1 1 5 Y ~ ~ 11 1 .r i .IW . \ N '.E V I S .~a , .r N I , Y CAF .pa rl, ,Y O k r i 1 1 v~~ Q RR I''ll ` I `1 4 ~i ~kG ELI ~ l.1 11. S l ~ YY1 } a ~~lFE I 1 T 1.~~ r~ y LV~`! f . i1 f hF1 II ~ .A~~ Ill` + Y d f'. } y+ ; VY 1, f d .il r ~ F I ~ . r If f E ,Y^ i y~1+'1 JIL a 4.r~'.,rrlt t N ,ail z 1+ sip ~Eis ~ w ~ z s Z o r ~ ~ m r o lu J5 _ r- m ~E ~ o t m r = z E C (a r m 1c) 'n I Vf C M A O N O ~ N G G7 2 A N co E m m ~ tj~A 1~] Z' X7 A rA M LA O ~ ~ N m N m A z n N m °z . O C~ ~ " G A e/ _ < co o m z °m o o ;o z A m 1 N H O \ rn to N x o m 06 3m. 0 A fTt 2 O zzC t i ~ I I u W w o„ V v v } ` `j J ,e ! t W ~ J ~V v o NA ~l1 $ x `r N m m r' c N m (-~1 v N G m m rte.. T Z J C3 Z n ~ 1 I \J 4 \3 6 ,N., co m v r ~ 6f E z a m n r" m M N N IN ;o '0 n 7O N A m m 0 -M CA a °m z m °z 4 C ~ O C 7 coN A m O A Vf n IT1 O ~f Lv --e m ; r4, LA Y 1 " LA Z N m N k" r- N '?Ir1 A , 8 r "Z n N r O 3 ' rA N r k , f ~ {J/ N 4 1 m m Z .r 1 >r .r 1 1 {N ~J W' ~ ~ W ~ pp pQ ~ ~ o r~`V 14 q4 M 1 ti ~ t J i 1 ! " ci s: ;a A m \ p N IkN R L ~ m r r ~ A H Xm tit C 3 --I i4y~, r m a r r oT A z -~1 4 H rW^ m i A .Nr c (A cc X m i z A n f\ 1 m y i IM N m y Q - m o c-} rfl f ? 'r 'zi r Co H m W b rs m u ~l . , 1 O C { m o m rr f o n x to z z r 0 Vi 0 Z +y Y 1 O -S-i m o k m . c; n r ~ ~ i r -n rn 1 7D tom„ r r, Vm, 1, J re 'A A J4 m Q 2c 10 C3 m ~C ~ 111 I ' F4 A N 1 M 2 H j , N ►pn o f a a ~ O n -n r~ z CA W u00 1,7 r 1 6 S Q w ` 1 ni z 'It 1 tr r 4 r s m m s r l p ,.y 4 m ? C ~ ~ , ~ r s Oz r m A o m n m m c r °m E C O N O (f yy x z n i S Ni b m o r- Y a M (A t CIP a (A m n~ m m z p o N O~s z~ -i r o 1 m m c] m o o c N H rn (A C; 0 Z b y, n ` p O VN von v O An A $ 0 ,1l o 2 Z 'o \ V1 N rrn ti y~ r K n rm- 1 x H~ ji, N N -~';t .1~ LA OI W W CO~ x J by n O o $ ° 1 s e z J ~ 4 M m r rn IC C, 0 d q ~ o m M d to 0° ° < r- m C O N O } V1 t0 E H r ra .a n5 O I"' Z .A 7D f'ff \ M LA -i 3 = 10 s) r A o m i -~~opr T, Q ~ • ~ j M a rozrl H Gl Z S~1 O O C H Omm A d A P N n m ° I e N o m r a mr$ f o N r N ro rNI rja $ r*1 0 ''ts 3 « tit p s 0 + ~ " H y J PA N r LA • 'i Q 1 1 H liY °o i d bd ~4 v c N J 1 ~ V ~ ~ ~ d € g w c Si b 1 ' M U\ ° ~ Z M ^1 r tl m r l r M y r s o t o m m n co r°n D 0 EA C w 2 A i z A A CI pi m N A N m N ti m o -n to r o ~o r n N j W 0 Z z m m W o m m oW In N o yi f4 ^ z1A m '~1 M Y tA m rp o I M 01 ~ r 1 S ~ n ~1 m ry ` z rrh vl l y m rr* m ♦ \ ~ ~z m m f: 3 m 3 ~ o r m C co P y C C N g 1 m z `N. a m c r ~tz Amy ' a rn -i f+1 N -i C A rM~ rN m \ A 'i z N r' O C C ~ ~ z m ~ r O C ~ OA m A 07 Il o y m A N M N .41 c ~xx y , ♦ H o z w N `J w m J c 0 1 koI y _ ' 3E E N 1 OF 1 ail Y 1. 1 FILE r' J Ir i r T i { tS