HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-1989
x•
~tl+kaf
(9■(t l~
!!!10
1A+9Vk
f
1.
t-aa+e^s
i
i
j
{
ClTYofDBNTON,TeXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 7620) / TELEPHONE (8) 7) $66-8200
March 31, 1989 O
~p
Mr. Frits Van der Veen
DBS Eacher Wyss
555, Notre-Dame Street
Lachine (Montreal), Canada H8S 2B1
RE: Lewisville Hydroelectric Project
Dear Mr, Van der Veen:
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation of March
28, 19890 regarding the extra charges due to Denton$a request {
Of DBS to delay and restart the subject hydro project, The
Staff is in agreement with the extra charges as per #
facsimile letter of March 209 1989, except the amo untyoof
$50,000 for general costs associated with stopping and
restarting the project, As per our telephone conversation of
March 28, 1989 you expressed that you would reduce this figure
to $35,000, w~tich we would support at the Staff level and
recommend to our Council a change order in the amount of +
$123,783,60, for all costs associated with the delay of this
project,
Please forpard to us a change order in this amount, and we will
proceed with obtaining Council approval,
Yours very txuly,
Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
kkn
{ cc: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
Joe Cherri, Electric Engineer 11
P).1 e
6323Us22
b'
JJ~
1
iM'N61'R
1
FEB 8 189 10148 FROM DBS ESCHER WYSS 9215 PAQE,002
r
I
AV
O
ods ISCHIN Wyse
d d, Ne Noue-Damo. Lachine iMomltdaq, Canada Hd8 261
Y a 16141490.2704 - T!lex; 66.822693 TAIAa16our• 16141 6.14-" e
" February 6, 1989 Via Teleco,gief
City of Denton
Purchasing
901-8 Texas Street
Ddutuu, JvA" 16161
v,s,A, ;
Attrnllnnr Mr, ,tnhn ,t, Marihdll
PurthasW ALdut
Refs City of Denton, Texas
Lewisville Hydroelectric Project A
specification No, 62,0200
8 & V Project No, 10566
Q¢S Contracts 720*110
user Sirs
Ve retret to sdvIot ym that Mir SW Hn1A11 t"lowl. vhn A" AArt ~
u!; L"otl 2843-01 „r t1.d U,tiitad 0td41 VorkaYs of Uarlaa, rated to
Sn not on strike sa of February 3, 1989. Therefore, all Mork in
uur yliwL is busyvuded till such tine as the strike is settled, }
This notice is beina given in oMlianee with Article GC, 15 of the +
Cuntract Docuseents and we intend to apply for a time extension once
the strike is settled.
20 the mrearr4ls,u, we Mlbll to ♦►auiu yud bf 8UY deaitie Ea reselvO ike
work stoppsas quickly so as to minimllO itA nffent on our s
contraots,
sincerely,
I
2,' enrney, Lnt,
Manager - contract Administration
e,c, Mr, he Ainsworth, Hook d 'poatch gnaineers - ArchitectM
to van 'der Veen, OUL'K
281/ai
city of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 1 TELEPHONE (817) 566-6200
MEMORANDUM
DATES January 11i. 1989
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
j FROM$ R. E. Nelson, Exec. Director of Utilities
R1:: D$S Hydro-turbine Change Order
Attached is the requested change order from DBS as a result 1
of the four (4) month delay of the hydro-turbine. We will
probably have to acknowledge some costs for:
1. Inflationary effects.
2. Lost revenue due to delayed payments.
3. Shutdown and restart costs.
4. Requested additional work.
✓1 Black & Veatch and our staff take exception to some of the
terms and issues, and a response has been prepared. DES
does not want to restart the project unless we agree to
their requests. They are willing to restart on a commitment
from you and 1, reoognizinq that the Council will have to
take final action on the change order. 33
li 1
Res ~eotfj#l~
R.E. Nelson P.E,
Executive Director of Utilities ~
gor:PT8001:UA
4
r
I
!kOO
w
~ W
ti
ciryof DEWON, rBXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
January 10, 1989
DBS Escher Wyss
C,po/po Box 555
Lachine Quebec, Canada H8S4E7
ATM zia Burney, Contract Administration
SUBJi Serial Letter DBS 022
t
We have reviewed your request for additional payments due to
the five months delay, along with the portions of the
contract which control conditions are applicable (OC14
through GC 21).
i
We agree with you that you are due extra funds due to delay,
but not in the quantities you have requested. Our reasons
are as follows:
i
1. The actual period of suspension of work was between 1.
j August 24, 1988, to December 21, 1988, which is four
months, rather than five months.
i 2. Your letter states you have not received any payment on
the . The of Denton the DBS
i
nvoicet$2032, datedi3/15/88, whichawasainstituted at
the insistence of the City in order to satisfy the
i construction start as required by FERC.
3. The original contract required certified ninety (90)
day drawings for which DBS would receive a 15% payment
(see GC 31).
DSS letter of 3/11/88 detailed the projected progress
payment schedule for their 158 amount of $203,845,50 to
be paid 5/31/88.
An invoice submitted 6/17/88 was not paid because of a
lack of certified data and d)•owings as outlined in the
Black & Veatch letter of July 8, 1988,
Since DBS failed to submit the required data prior to
the August 24, 190, suspension date, the lack of
payment of this amouat should not be Denton's
liability.
r=
.R
■ kKW2e9'
rts`{ i
Therefore, it is recarmended that DBS be canpensated for the delay in
construction as follows
ESCALATION (58) (158)
[1,358,970 - (67,948.50 + 203,845.50)1 x 4/12 x 6% m $21,743.52
FINANCE
[88 330 - (271,790) x 9% x 4/12 m $18,346.08
Remake moulds $ 71000.00
Early start of work on STAY RING 4j714.00
;
r
i
TOTAL $51;803.60
Section GC 16 refers to real and unavoidable direct cost incurred by the
a contractor. In order to qualify for payment, sufficient documentation
by DBS will be required for the following:
Storage Costs, Restart of Project
in reference to the progress payments, it should be understood that the
City cannot legally pay for anything that is not received. We are in
process of getting the 158 Invoice from Black A Veatch so it can be
processed. I would expect you to receive this payment approximately
1/16/89.
Under Seot'.on GC 31, the progress payments are tied to delivery of
different oc ponents. If you can show, for example, that the generator
cot is 308 rather than 108 as originally shown, the amounts and
percentages can be changed.
If all items are received by July 1, we have no problem with payment of
908 of the contract amounts by that time.
The 108 amount which is to be held until acceptance cannot be paid until
the equipment is actually rested. Considering the other terms of the
contract, I do not believe that an escrow account would be necessary.
Please respond at your earliest convenience, since we do not wish to
further delay the project. Change orders of this size mast be approved
by our City Council, and the payment schedule of 2/1/89 may not be s
attainable. #
Yours truly, *Mwar
%ison
Executive b
i>1soti~ur of Utilities !j
MTstn
2EBTO10689288
I
f~
DEC 23 196 12223 FROM D85 ESCHER WY55 0215 PARE @02
C~%~Fi ,
oss 99CHIN WY99 q'
J,fl!,16 i sa°~•'~6+"Te1o~se~,°68 f tB~uAJe bite ,
December 220d, 1948 Serial Letter no- M 022
r -
i
%lack 4 vestoh city of Denton Purchastpa
Engineers 6 Architects 901.1 Texas Street
1100 Maadaw Lake Parkway Denton, Taxes 76201 USA
Kansas CitYe Missouri Attni Mr. John J+ Marshall
64114 -USA Purchasins
Aeti ian~ Mr,~ ,P'. (iuvat f
Re, City of Denton,-Texas
Swit ca ion Was 6~0200Pro}ect
my Project 10566
t►te Consract 720110.
Dear Sir.
We have been advised verbally by Mr* bob Nelson, of Denton I
l
Municipal Utilities that .the cider of Menton and 1fsSUs have
J rtselwd their differences and that our contract is tWYSto be
releasedo The contract is basicaily on hold as instructed per your i
letter of August 244 1908. The additional price (rat, our letter 1
of Sept t3) for rssvoins work an this contract, if it release is
f(one shoe" oby JAI%, d We t9+nndred8ninneety nia#)4 The breakdown for hich`isffas ~
t
tallow s is ip addition to the 14714
, ►1eNs note that thi
the early start of work on the stay ring, reference our letter '
D18_016+
tie (b. n our Setter *I'SEpt.11. 190b1
4Y!a-~~- f
■ S 1",400 I
Mesa for 5 months S X 3504
, ~i }
8scalation for 5 months 11103380970 X 5 X • S )3 1 ;
w • ~
Restart of project s 30.000
finwo oust for S Months based on work due
till Ausust 24, 1983 at interest rate of 9% ■ $
885,330 X .49 x ¢
12 Total 91344599
µfiQLpt I■
Ib.1a, !
1
n
DEC 23 'Be 12+23 FROM DBS ESCHER WYSS N213 PA0E,003
NO I& wqm
Slack b Veatch
Kansas City, Missouri
Pate 2
As you are avert, we have spent considerable amount of money and
have not received any payment from the Owner,
The term of payment should be revised as followai
to Release At 152 progress payment i,i edia m y but no later than
Jau,S, loss.
h 2, Payment of storage and finance cost by February 1. 1999,
I
1
2• 302 Progress payment to be released U n shipment or offer of
t shipment of generator on Jan, 16, 1969,
4, 251 progress payment upon delivery or offer to ship of all
ambedded parts, stay ring and distributor "stably components
by may 1, 19696
#
S, 102 progress payment for balance of items by July 1, 1969•
68 101 hold back to be out into an escrow aeeount starting on
July 1, 19a9 and until final acceptance and payment is made by
the Owner,
The cost iepaot4 if any, of the warranty of our equipment will hew f
to be rene6otiated, once we know the final pro,lect Schedule.
We would appreciate an early respouss, Y
Yours truly,
{
J tia Burney
Manager - Contract AdmiaistratoA
DDS ESCKU WYSS
Coco W.D, Strub
F, van der Visa
A, J, Mettler
R
zas~
w
rt
rte;,,
r
JAI
1
cirvot DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 7, 1966
/ TO: LLOYD V. HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
s
r FROM: R. R. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
RE: Effectiveness of Denton's Industrial Pretreatment f
Program
j
Denton. is required by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) j
to have an Industrial Pretreatment Program, as are all major
wastewater treatment plants, The purpose of this program Is to
work with industries, monitor them and set industrial (and
perhaps commercial) wastewater discharge limits for their
plants, all in an effort to keep toxic substances from reaching
Denton's wastewater treatment plant. Toxic substances
presently are essentially heavy metals such as mercury, lead,
cadmium, zinc, etc,, which can kill the micro-organisms in the E`
wastewater treatment plant's process where their purpose is to
decompose all of the organic material coming through the plant,
s A recent article in the newspaper relating to a report from EPA
on an inspection they made in July may have given the
j impression that Denton s program was not as effective as it
should be. Howard Martin, our Environmental Services
Administrator, prepared a brief report on the EPA ispection
(attached) in order to summarize the EPA report.
The bottom line is that Denton's Industrial Pretreatment
Program is operating very effectively. We have good control 1
over all industries that might discharge hazardous materials,
l
~
and those industries are cooperating very well with Denton 's
staff. The program has met every one of its objectives of
assuring that no toxic materials enter or leave the Wastewater
Treatment Plant and that all potential sources are identified
and these industries pretreat thoir waste and prevent toxics
from entering the sewer system. We have been able to do this
in a spirit of cooperation and technical assistance with our
industries, rather than by resorting to unproductive
adversarial penalty methods.
6078U:10
~n wf
unnc'rtw
Memorandum to L, V, }carrell
PRe., age 2 Effectiveness of Denton's Industrial Pretreatment Program
Extensive lab
quantities of hteeasts show that there are only very minute
vy metals coming into and going
plant- in fact, a 90% decrease from 1985 Inclromeut all EPA
st n dards are being met, and are actually well below EPA
requirements,
We do acknowledge that we are understaffed in this area, and
probably should have been more assertive in the budget process
this year to allocate more personnel to the area. However,
having a lean staff (one person) has not kept Howard's rou
r
from doing a good job, We also acknowledge that it would
probably be a good idea to sample some of the university
facilities, especially their labs and physical plant, boilers,
etc,, but the tests we have run do not indicate any violations
from these sources.
We did err in not correctly reporting to EPA that the fine for
violating the Industrial Pretreatment Ordinance had been
increased from a maximum of $200 per day to $2000 per day.
This change had been done by a single comprehensive ordinance
to cover many city ordinances, rather than by specifically
changing the Industrial Pretreatment Ordinance, and we
apparently did not get this information adequately disseminated
to the Industrial Pretreatment personnel,
The remaining EPA issues i
f discharge standards and we110ofllcourseto a to
kitightening to
i f meet such now standards. Tliis, we believe, will be an action
process for many years, r
1 do want to praise }toward Martin, our Industrial Pretreatment
Administrator, and the entire Municipal Laboratory Staff, The
r are very dedicated to the goal of bein
{
' water reources, g good stewards of our
kespectfull ,
R. E. Nelson, P,E. )E
Executive Director of Utilities P
i
gcr
cc, C. David Nam, Director Wtr/WW Services
Howard Martin, ESA
file
6078Ur11
i'
i
l
CHIT
rim"]
.M` li.
MEMORANDUM
I~
h TOo R. E. NELSON
FROMi JIM COULTER
i
DATEi 10/8/88
RES INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM AUDIT
Representatives from the EPA and SAIC (Scientific Applications
International Corporation) audited our industrial pretreatment
program an June 7, S and 9. They reviewed all aspects of our
program to verify that we are conducting our pretreatment program in
compliance with federal regulations. We received the final report
of the audit on August 22. The final report is divided into three
sections. Section Bo Required Actions] Section Ci Recommendations
for improved implementation and enforcement of program requirements] 1
and Section Di required modifications to the City's approved
pretreatment program. The following is a summary of the audit
findings. a
"The City of Donton'n pretrsatmenf pregram + approved March 16, 1984,
is currently operating in a relatively satisfactory manner with
regard to program implementation) however several areas within thw
program will require strengthening and modification to ensure
continued effectiveness."
i ,
B. Required Actions- those areas which might result in
Administrative Orders
t
1. The City of Denton will be required to initiate complete and
1 thorough inspections and monitoring of the followings University of
North Texas, Texas Woman's University, Denton State School and area
hospi taI s.
I '
2. The City of Denton will be required to begin routine monitoring
for cyanide and total toxic organics for categorical industries.
~ I
C. Recommended POTW Actions-
1. Continue with efforts to increase maximum fines from $200.00 per
day to $2000.00 per day.
2. Complete the extrajurisdictional contract with the City of
Corinth and develop procedural mechanisms to implement the
pretreatment program in the now area.
11 ~
3. Issue permits to Denton State School, University of North Texas
and Texas Woman's University.
1
i
Ulm"
I
sWMi k F ~
4. Procedures should be developed to permit, inspect, manifest and
randomly sample septic waste haulers if we develop this program.
5. Assess all additional changes we fo*1 are necessary to
strengthen and clarify the provisions of the Sewer Use Ordinance and
submit theme changes to the EPA as a single package.
6. Modify and expand our permit format to remove any ambiguity with
regard to applicable limits, point of application and the standard
conditions which apply to all industrial users.
7. Develop a standardized industrial user inspection procedure,
including a form to ensure that all facets of the indur -ial
operation are inspected.
8. Develop and utilize a written enforcement/response guidance
document to ensure consistent and effective enforcement procedures. '
i
9. "The requirements and recommendations identified in this audit
report will likely result in a substantial increase in the manpower '
needs for program implementation. The City should reassess the
current staffing situation to ensure that the program is effectively
i nmrnted. "
h
D. Required modifications to the approved pretreatment program- t
9
1. The City of Denton will be required to develop technically based
local limits. Local limits mitst be revised and submitted to EPA for
approval based on the findings of this technical evaluation. Once
these limits are established, they should be incorporated into thm
City's Bawer Use Ordinanco with language ensuring their
enforceability.
2. The City of Denton will be required to develop an enforceable
contract for extraJurisdictionta contributors to the AOTW.
' Bamicaliy, what the EPA to saying is that for the past -four years we
have been able to most the basic program requirements, however,
present and future requir-ements, development of local limits,
extroJurisdictional Contracts, increaeQd surveillance monitoring
etc* will require #.'~at we expand pretreatment program operations.
Failure to expand tin program to meet these requirements will result >
in a vi dl 4t i on of our NFDES permit. ~
The article in the Denton Record Chronicle stated " that hazardous
waste could creep into the water supply from Denton'• two
universities. Direct discharge points from the two universities are
not monitored] however, monitoring is performed at the water
reclamation plant influent and effluent weekly for hbavy metals. A
complete priority pollutant scan of treatment plant influent,
effluent and sludge was performed in March 1988. This pollutant
scan cost $1900.00. The results from these analyses indicate that
I~
i
i
M"j
F
we hove good control over hazardous materials entering and leaving
the plant. Currently the Pecan Creek Water Reclamation Plant is
meeting all federal discharge requirements.
Presently, all categorical industries are in compliance with local
and federal pretreatment program requirements. The Water i
Reclamation Plant has not experienced any upsets attributable to
industrial discharges in the past 3 years. Heavy metals and
particularly chromium are a concern to the operation of the Water
Reclamation Plant. Since 1985 we have experienced s 90% decrease
in the levels of chromium being discharged to the Pecan Creek Water i
Reclamation Plant.
Following the EPA audit a survey was conducted of comparable sized
cities with similar industrial contributors. Based on our survey
and discussions with representatives from the EPA, for a City the
size of Denton with our industrial base we should have 3 to 4 people
working an the industrial pretreatment program. I have included a
copy of the survey.
file auditl
j
I
M
yt
INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT OURVEY
i CITY POPULATION PRETREATMENT PLANT SIZE INDUSTRIES
STAFF CAT' NCAT1
i
Sulphur 20.000 2 5.2 MOD 1 4
Springs
i
coreicane 25,000 2 3.5 MOD 2 3
Denison 25,000 3 3.4 MOD 5 5
4
Sherman 34.000 w 12 MOD 4 6
I Lufkin 42,000 4 10 MOD 7 2
Lewisville 46,000 4 12 MOD 4 5
Harlingen 461000 4 6.7 MOD 10 60
Longview 70,000 4 14 MOD 10 22
Texarkana 72,000 3 20 MOD 7 16
Denton 63 s 000 1 er** 12 MOD 3 1 2
1 Categorical Industry
2 NonCategorical Industry
E * Includes minor induntr~ies+/restaurant s
j Includes i lab position dedicated to Industrial Pretreatment Program
r i** Bob Goodfellow (EPA Enforcement Branch) recommended 3-5 people r
f Files survey
1 ~
t
i
i
I
C
1
1
i
i'
I
Y~04&t4
t
UkW
f
Cd
i
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / rEL EPNONE (817)566.8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 60 1988
TO: FILE- LEWISVILLH HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
FROM. R, E, Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
fff RE$ Non-Consumptive Water Rights Permit f
rr Y rrrrrrrYrrrrrrrr rrrrrr•rrrr Mwrr.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
R, B, Nelson, and Howard Martin met with Mike Booth of Booth,
Newsom, Attorneys, Then met with Jack Chitwoods Terry Slade,
Crai , at the Texas Water Commission, Austin,
R a V e Iwe enf s FERC hydro license for Lewisville and Ray
Roberts, They had some discussion about whether hydro could be
a "subordinate" purpose, and we advised that the flow to the
hydro unit would be strictly that flow needed to serve Dallas'
Water Plant requirements, They expresiied that the apppropriate
way to, permit this is to amend Dallas' Water Rights Permit in
( Lewisville, They felt that both Denton and Dallas' permit would
have to be amended for Ray Roberts, I advised that Dallas has j
expressed an interest in installing a pipeline on the
Lewisville outlet works, and that Denton is working with Dallas
f on an agreement to delay this pipeline until 2005,
J [ There is some uncertainty as to whether there will need to be a
sso Sin publiffecctedno, MikepBCeand TWCcStaffot xpressed eoptimism thattwould
not need such process, If public notice is required, could
{ take 4r6 months; with no public notice, 6~0-9,0 days,
i advised that Dallas had indicated they wanted Dallas to
handle all legal aspects and costs to get the permit, but we
would need to confirm this, State requested that the Dallas
Cityy Council adopt a resolution authorizing Denton to act in
Dallas' behalf before the State began any ,action, Mike B, was
requested to draft such a resolution and send to Denton,
i
6078Us12
'a
`4
A N{Mf~
W
A
1
File: Lewisville Hydroelectric Project
Non-Consumptive Water Rights Permit
Page 2
Mike B, advised that Denton would have to assemble information
regr+:iing water conservation activities and plans in place
since that is a required part of a water permit application
change, T advised Mike B, to take the lead in pressing forward
as fast as possible, Denton has sent Mike a purchase order for
$3000 to begin this work, and Mike is to advise as he reaches
limits on this PO so additional authorization can be
forwarded, He advised that he would visit again with the staff
next week to help assure that the full public notice process
can be avoided, since this permit does not change any flows
s that now exist,
LZ 7~ r
, e son, , .
Executive Director of Utilities
cr
cc: Howard Martin, Environmental Services Adm,
File
i i .
607BU:}2
I j
i II
I
I
1
• °dew
DAL
CITyOf0&NT0A1,TBXAB MUNICIPAL OUIL DING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566"8200
MEMO.---- RANDUm
i
DATE; October 6, 1988
{ TO.- FILE- TWU IRRIGATION PROJECT
FROMs R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities ±
E
RE: Meeting I0/6/88 With TWC Staff Regarding Permits
f
►►O►rw°.►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►•►►y►.►wr►►►►►r►►r►►►►►►►►r►►►►►►.►r►
RoE. Nelson and Howard Martin met with Frank booth Newsom, Attorneyys, in Austin at 9;00 AM, October6 1988. Then i
met with Jack Chitwood Terry Slade and Craig
the Texas Water Commission at 10;30 AN,
Reviewed TWU desire to either drill two water wells to irrigate
their golf course, and campus or be able to t
purchase sewer
effluent water from Denton at a cost effective rate,
TWC staaf copy. the report done on the concept and provided vthem
with I requested information on what process is
necessary to get authorization and what permits are necessary,
A ! Howard advised them that we had 89 acre feet of irrigation
water rights from a 44 acre tract of land Denton had purchased
from the Felix Calahan estate, The State advised that:
1, if that 69 acre feet of irrigation water was a result
of flow from the Wastewater Treatment Plant, then we
could use as irrigation right and no additional permit
is needed to sell this 30 MOD to TWU,
2, The City may take as much water as they want from the
wastewater discharge stream for irrigation of their own
municipal park system and no additional permit is
needed,
3, The City can use water from their wastewater discharg
stream without affecting downstream water rights iF
such water comes from ground water sources, to., wells, f'
I (Denton has several mobile home parks that discharge
water into Denton's wastewater system who get their
water from wells), Not clear at this time whether this j
requires a special permit, I
6078Ut14 f
'Vol
TWU Irrigation Project
Meeting 10/6/88 with TWC Staff Regarding Permits
Page 2
4. Any water additional to !1, #2 or N3 above, must be
from a "water conservation" wastewater discharge
ppermit or an amendment to the water rights from Lake
Lewisville designating the present "municipal use" to
"irrigation use". This position is not clearly
undersoood.
I advised Mike B. that Denton did not want to work on this
project until we are complete with the Lewisville and Ray
Roberta project. Denton can always dove forward with the sale
of water to TWU in an effluent pipeline system, but instead of
using sewer effluent, Denton can buy additional water from
Dallas.
The TWC staff inquired about Denton's use of sewer effluent at
the Power Plant and expressed Denton may be violating the
wastewater discharge permit at present. Denton and Mike B.
advised that it should not be considered a violation since
other TWC permits have allowed such wastewater flow uses so
tong as it is for municipal purposes and, since this Is a
municipally owned power plant, this use qualifies under TWC
standard rules, In addition, Denton probably has more water
coming into the Wastewater Treatment Plant from wells than does
the Power Plant use on an annual basis. This issue is not
resolved and may surface in the future. I
I
Executive Director of Utilities
gcr
cc: Howard Martin, Environmental Services Adm.
file
607SU:1S
r
i
I
6401
h
1r
I .i
M~
ciryot DENro rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
i
I
December 21, 1988
i
CHU Mr. Michel Lariviere _ I
DBS Escher 1Vyss
555 Notre Dame Street j
Lachine, Quebec, Canada H88 2B1
REt L1?wISVILLE }iYURQBICPRTC TURBINE
i
Dear Mr. Lariviere;
Please proceed with all the turbine manufacturing activities on this
project. The Cities of Denton and Dallas reached an agreement on
December 14 1988, where Dallas agreed not to install a pipeline until
at least 2065.
3
ry truly yours,
f I LG~ ~
1 8mie B, Tullos
i
Director of Electric Utilities
i
IYC12nd 8029
cc; Harrell, City Manager, Denton
R. Nelson Executive Director of Utilities
Joe Cherri, Electrical En~ gineer
Robert Crisp, Director, FIiRC Atlanta, GA,
J. Mark Robinson, Director, EBRC, Washington, D.C.
Bruce Ainsworth, Black 4 Veatch Consulting Engineers
k
k
efi
i
I
roerx
1D
CITY O/ DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
0
December 21, 1988
Mr. David Guyot DEC
Black $ Veatch 2 2~
! 1500 Meadow Lake Parkway
Kansas City, MO 64114 ea 0 ICE 1
RB: LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC TURBINE I
i
Dear David:
This is to confirm my verbal instructions to Bruce Ainsworth on Priday,
December 16, 1988, regarding the Lewisville Hydroelectric Turbine,
Please proceed with all the engineeringg, general construction and
turbine manufacturing activities on thie project,
i
Included is the UNSIGNBD copy of the Supplement Agreement No. 1 to the
untreated water con rac between the Cities of Denton and Dallas which
will be incorporated in the Corps of Engineers Memorav.dum of Agreement
for the site access during project construction. Denton and Dallas
approved the agreement on December 13 and 14 of 1988 respectively.
truly yours,
ba.-
Ernie B. Tullos
Director of Electric Utilities
BBT : gb
IYCI21688029
Enc; Unsigned copy of Dallas/Denton agreement
cc: %eloyyd Harrell, City Manager, Denton I
R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
Joe Cherri, Electrical Engineer
Robert `Cris , Director, PERC Atlanta GA,
J, Mark Robinson, Director, hRC WasAington, D.C,
Bruce Ainsworth, Black 4 Veatch 6onsulting Engineers
y
FILE COPY
WrYof DENT4N, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDINQ / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 668.8307
OINoe of the City Manager
December 19, 1988
r
Richard Knight
I City Manager
City of Dallas
1500 Marilla Street
Dallas, TX 75201
Dear Richard:
Just a brief note to express my sincere appreciation for your
help in expediting the agreement between the City of Denton and
the City of Dallas relative to the hydroelectric unit to be
placed at Lake Lewisville,
You certainly delivered on your pledge to help make this
agreement possible provided that both the projects for Denton
and Dallas could be completed, The agreement which was
y formalize between our utility departments effectively
accomplished that goal,
Again, I personally thank you for your help in this matter,
T a signing of this agreement has done much to further the
cooperative relationship between our two communities,
I look forward to seeing you in the near future. Please let me
know if I can ever return the favor,
i
Very my yours,
Lloyd V, Harrell
City Manager
LVHsbw
435814
boor Bob Nelson
i
I
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 16201 / TELEPHONE (811) 566.8200
J
MEMORANDUM ddd
3
i
j TO,. LLOYD V. HARREL, CITY MANAGER
r
FROM: R, E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
DATE; October 2S, 1988
1
RE: Public Notice- Lewisville Lake Conservation Storage.
r rwrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rr.rrrrr•rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr •rrrrr rrrrrrr
r, f Attached is the notice that we have all been expecting from the Corps
regarding the authorization to raise the level of Lewisville Lake. ;
Denton and Dallas staffs will be meeting soon to determine if we should
take water out of Ray Roberts to raise Lewisville, If we raise 1
y Lewisville too much and then get a large rain which fillf Lewisville above
the 522' level, the Corps will "dump" the water. Denton and Dallas will
then have to wait longer to get Ray Roberts filled
R. E. Nelson, P,E.
Executive Director of Utilities
gcr
cc! David Ham, Director of Water/Wastewater Services
Howard Martin, Environmental Services Coordinator
Jerry Roush, Supt,, Water production
file
6078U:34
I ~4
9
I
OCT z4 1986
E!1@L14 d4T14E
CHANGE OF TOP OF CONSERVATION STORAGE
FOR LEWISVILLE LAKE
Notice la hereby issued to the public that the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, has been authorized
to raise the top of the conservation storage pool level at
Lewisville Lake from 616 foot above mean sea level to Set,
The Impoundment of this additional water may begln on or
about November 30, 1988. The conservation storage pool is
the water maintained tot purposes such as water supply,
recreation and Irrigatlon.
This Impoundment sot ion does not neoessarlly mean that the
lakels level will rise, Actual water levels at Lewlavllle
Lake will depend on rainfall and the water supply needs of
the cities of Dallas and Denton, Both cities have permits }
issued by the state of Texas to market the water In the
conservation pool and they will decide what additional water,
If any, needs to be stored at the reservoir, Dallas and
Denton will relmburse the federal government for allowing
them to store their water In the Corps' Lewisville Lake.
New areas which May be under water consist exclusively of
government-owned or government-controlled lands along the
Llttle Elm and Elm Fork of the Trinity River extending from
Lewisville dam upstream approximately 13 miles,
For additional Information, call the Lewisville Project
i Office at, metro 5214) 434-1888.
! j
lI4
I
I
it
j
i
ClryofDBNroN,r6XAS MUNICIPAL 6UILDfNG / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200
October 3, 1988
I
Ms. Lois Cashell, Acting Secretary
Pederal Energy Regulatory Commission
i
825 North Capitol Street, N.E.
{ Mail Stop: DPCA-HL•21
Washington, D.C. 20426 E
RE: License #3940.004, City of Denton, Lewisville Dam
Hydroelectric Project
I
Gentlemen: 1
This letter is to provide you with an update on the progress of
sub ect project since my =.etter of August 24, 1988 to Mr. Fred
Sppr, ngger, and to confirm my telephone conversations with Hossein
Ildari on September 13th and September 2S, 1988.
The City o£ Denton's Utility and Legal Staffs met jointly with
Colonel Schaufelberger and his staff at the Port Worth Corps of
Engineers' District office and Matalyn Harp, Assistant Water
Director of Dal). as on September 6, 1988. On September 19, 19880 a
E meeting was held between myself and the Acting Water Director of
Dallas, Dennis Allen. The results of those meetings were that
Dallas has indicated they are willing to delay installation of their
roposed Vipeline until approximately 2005, Denton has submitted to
Dallas a 'Memorandum of Agreement" outlining a delay of the pipeline
until the year 200S, listing the percentage share of electrical
benefits Denton would share with Dallas, clarifying and assuring
Dallas of Denton's support that the hydro unit will not be operated {
such that Dallas would lose water supplies, and agreeing to have the !
"non•consumptiYell water rights permit for the hydro unit from the
Texas Water Commission in Dallas' name. Dallas appears reasonably
agreeable to these general principles and is reviewing ,his
Memorandum of Agreement at present.
The goal is to have this Memorandum of Agreement signed by the
respective City Managers of Dallas and Denton within the week and
place the Agreement on the respective City Council agendas for
appproval by the end of October, Mr, Ray Losornio, of Colonel
Schaufelberger's office, has been advised of this and has expressed
! t
low,
Ms, Lois Cashell, Acting Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
License 03940.004, City of Denton
Lewisville Hydroelectric Project
--Page 2
that the Corps of Engineers would consider such an Agreement
satisfactory, whereby he felt a recommendation could be forwarded to
General Lee of the Southwestern Division of the Corps of Engineers
in Dallas recommending that the Corps siggn the '"Memorandum of
Agreement for Support by the Corps and Estabilshing Procedures for 00
Access and Site Activities" with Denton. This action would allow
' Denton to proceed, hopefully, by November 1, 1988.
Denton is very determined to get this project underway and is
continuing to work on a number of areas even during this temporary
delay. Attached is a letter from Dominion-Bridge Sulzer, the
i turbine manufacturer, stating the percent completion of the
$1,3011,000 turbine, Also enclosed is a copy of the power house
I specifications that will be released immediately after the Corps of
hngineers signs the above-mentioned Agreement,
I will keep you posted on any further actions related to lifting
this unfortunate temporary delay of the hydroelectric project.
Please call me if you have any questions, ,
Respectfully
R, E. Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
{ gcr j
bnclosures:
I. Letter from Dominion Bridge
II, Powerhouse Specifications
b07bU:4-6
{
I I
a
1 I
.
Ms, Lois Cashell, Acting Secretary
Federal Energy'Regulatory Commission
License #394U0-004, City of Denton
Lewisville Hydroelectric Project
-Page 3
i
40
cc: Mr, Fred Springer, Director, Office of Hydropower Licensing,
FERC, 825 North Capitol Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426
Ron Corso, Director, Division of Dam Safety and Inspections, f
825 N. Capital St., N.H., Washington, DC 20426
i
Robert W. Crisp, Regional Director, FBRC, 730 Peach 'free
St., Rood: 800, Atlanta, GA 30308
John E. Schaufelberger, Colonel, Corps of Engineers, PO Box
173000 Pt, Worth, Tx 76102.0300 d
' General Lee, Corps of Engineers, Dallas, Texas
t of Denton;
oy arrell, Denton City Manager
Ernie Tullos Director of Electric Utilitis, Denton
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney
R
Black Veatch, Engineers, Attn: David Guyot,
PO Box 8405, Kansas City, MO 64114
f
f
h
a
600bU:45-47
{
t
4980..__..
SEP 2 2
DUPuCATE
Des e8CHIN WYSS
666, rue Nolte-Dame, tachlne `Montreaq C111"A H8S 20 i
Tel., (514) 634.3561 , T4Iex; 06.821683 • TAIACOpleuc (5 t4) 638.81 T8
i
September 16, 1988 Via Tclecopler j
i
City of Denton
_ 2156, Mckinney Street
Denton, Texas
76201 U.S.A.
Attention) Mr, R,R. (Bob) Nelson
Refi Lewisville Hydroelectric Prolect
Dear Sir,
As reque.4ted, please find listed below the status of completion on
the major components of the turbine for the above project,
Item No, Dentition L eted
1 Runner Hub 60%
2 Runner Blades 85%
3 Discharge Ring 15%
4 Draft Tube 75%
5 Gate Oper, Ring 80% I
6 Inner Distributor 75% I
' 7 Outer Distributor 40%
8 Tyton Seal 50%
9 Shaft b Bearings 40%
1~J •
t0 Stay Ring 80%
As of the date that the project was put on hold the statue of
completion on this project was approximately 65%,
i
Trusting that the above information is to your satisfaction,
{
Regards.
j
i
DBS CHRR
M. La viers
Project Manager
i
ML13/pk
1
SpgCIFICATIONS
AND
DOCUMENTS
aOMPLETE SET OF SPECIFICATION
ON PILE IN OPPICE OP THE
ACTING SECRETARY OF PERC
i
i
f
CITY OF DEWMN, TEXAS
grYgylls MROELNCTIUC PROJECT i
C}ENjgAL CONSTRUCTION I
1
WD NVbMER
5 SPCOIM~ TRA~C"Lo1Iou&n.0 00o
I
f i
E
Issuedi JUL i 51988 !
i!
I hereby certify that this specification was prepared by me or
under rofeuione lr6n91neer under+the awe of the Stateyof Tilxaand
p
r
Dote neg, No. BLACK & WATCH
EngineernArcWteofa
ISanaae City, Mieaouri '
I
1888 it
J
MNM~
.[ryp:(SVJ~
A■Qi{
~J
CITY OF DENTON, TERAS
LI,WISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS
FOR
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATION 10566.71.0000
TABLE OF CON,NTzTS
Paso thl-u P, age 1
a
t. BIDDING RgQUTAEM8NT3 (Bound also Issued seend
parately)
t
Advertisement A-1 M2
$-T
Instructions to Bidder BC--1 l W
Proposal D»1 C-1, I
Proposal Data
II. CONTRACT FORMA
Contract Agreement CA-1 CA-2
Performance Bond PFB-1 en-2
f Payment Bond PYS»1 PYB-2.
III. CONTRACT REGULATIONS
{ General Conditions OC»1 OC»21
Sample Price Breakdown Form i page
Special Conditions 8C-1 BC-16
IV. SPECIFICATIONS
DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Station
IA - General Description and Scope lA»1 IA-5
of the Work 18-1 18-4
18 - Drawing List 1C-1 IC-6
1C - Engineering Data
1D - Contractor's Quality Assurance 1D-1 1D-3
Program lE-1 3E»2
1E - Construction Schedule 1F-1 1F-3
ip - Construction Services 10 r Recaiving► Handling, and storage 10-1 10-4
(DENTON 10566 GEN CONST 71.0000;
1
TC-1
}
_Page thru page
DIVISION 2 - Simon
Station
2A - Earthwork 2A-1 2A-13
2S - Construction Cofferdams 2S-1 25-2
2C - Drainage Piping 2C-1 2C-3
2D - Dewatering 2D-1
2E - Riprap 2E-1 2E-4
2F - Erosion Control 2F-1 2F-2
20 - Chain Link Fencing 20-1 20-5
2H - Aggregate Surfacing 2H-1 2H-3 !
DIVISION 3 - CONCRETE
I i
Section
} 3A - Cast-In-Place Concrete 3A-1 3A-29 j
3B - Grouting 39-1 3E-5
DIVISION 4 - NOT USED
{
DIVISION S - METALS -
Section
SA - Structural Steel and Mis.
cellaneous metals 5A-1 SA-16 !
58 - Metal Deck Form 58-1 5B-2
6 DIVISION 6 - NOT USED
I~ DIVISION 7 - MOISTURE PROTECTION )
Section
I 3
7A - Elaetomerio Roof Costing 7A-1
78 - Caulking and Sealing 7E-1 7A-2
j 7C - Waterproofing 7E-3
I 7D - Aiuainum Louvers 7C-1 7C-3
F I 7D"1 7D-2
I DIVISION 8 - DOORS AND WINDOWS
Section
U - Metal Doors, Frames, and Hardware SA-1
8A-9
DIVISION 9 - FINISHES
I
Section
9A Painting
9A-1 9A-16
i
(DENTON 105660GEN C6NST 71,00001
TC-2
I '
r
Page t~ hr~ uu nits,
DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES
$action
I' LOA - Eyewash Station 10A-1
DIVISIONS 11 thru 14 (Not Used)
DIVISION 13 - MECHANICAL
Section
15A - Owner-Furnished Equipment
and Materials 15A-1
Subsection
15A1 - Turbine I5A1-I 1SA1-7 j
( 15A2 - 0enarator 1SA2-1 ISA2-8 1
15A3 - Excitation and Controls 150-1 15A3-8
15A4 - Electrohydraulic Govern-
ins system 15A4-1 15A4-15
t ! 15A5 - Miscellaneous Mechanical
Equipment 25A5-I
15B - Contraotor-Furnished Equipment 15B-1 158-16
Substation
i 1581 - dump Pumps 1581-1 1581-5
1582 • Hire Extinguishers 1382-1
1383 - Welded Steal Penstock 1563-1 15B3-5
150 - Auxiliary Mechanical Equipment
Erection 15C-1 15C-5
15D - Miscellaneous piping 15D-1 15D-11
Subsection
15D1 - Pipeline List 15D1-1
15E - Miscellaneous valves 15E-1 1SE-3
Subsection
1581 - Buttarfly Valves 24 Inch
and Larger 1SE1-1 1521-5
1522 - Valve List 1922-1
15F - Penstock Installation 1SP-1 15P-6
15G - Turbina-Genarator Erection 150-1 150-11
ISH - $paae Conditioning 15H-1 ISM-$
Substation
1SH1 - Slectrio Heaters ISHI-1 ISHI-2
1SH2 - Power Roof Ventilators 15H2-1 1SH2-10
151 - Startup 15I-1 131-4
i
IDENTON 10566062788OEN 71,00001
TC-3 )
4
"'~i 'F'W1
"Owl
Pane th u Pass
DIVISION 16 - ELECTRICAL
Section
16A - Contractor-Furnished Equipment
and Materials 16A-1
Subsection
16A1 - Battery 16A1-1 16A1-3
16A2 - Battery Charger 16A2-1 16A2-3
16A3 - Separately Mounted Motor
Starters 1643-1 16A3-5
160 - AC and DC Panelboards 16A4-1 16A4-3
16A5 - Dry Type Transforawrs 16A5-1
16A6 - Disconnect Switches 16A6-1
16AI - Separately mounted lush-
button Control stations 16A7-1
16AS - Power Transformer 16AS-1 16AB-13 i,
16A9 - Outdoor Circuit Breakers 16A9-1 16A9-9
16A10 - Outdoor Disconnect
Switches 16AIO-1 I6AIO-3
163 - Electrical Equipment traction 168-1 16M
16C - Raceway 16C-1 16C-17
16D - Conductors 16D-1 16D-11
169 - Grounding 16E-1 16E-5
16P - Lighting 168-1 168-5
APPENDIX A - Subsurface Information 47 pages
APPENDIX B - Regulatory Requirements 34 pages
I h ~
i
(DENTON 10566 GEN CONST 71.0600
062888 l
r
1 ~
1 ,
F F Owl
ADVERT~
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
FOR
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
LEVISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT
SID N MbER
~~s Z 71 Cit
t he of 8aalad bids will be eived.5 y the Texas Street,DDenton,TTaxas,aprior tofice
of aptember 23, 1 antral Standard Tina, than publicly
0
opened for p
GENERAL. CONSTRUCTION
Prospective bidders say examine copies of the drawings And $Pacification$ 1
at the office of Black 4 Veatch, Enginsaro-Architects, 11401 Lamar, Over-
land Park, Xsnsas.
Drawings and specifications will be loaned only to those bidders who have
been deteraiaed by the City of Denton, Texas to be qualified to bid. De-
terataation of a prospective bidder's qualifications will be based en-
tirely on written evidence submitted by the bidder in duplicate to the
City and the Engineer not later than 21 days before the time sat for open-
LOS the bids. Each prospective bidder shall submit evidence that hei
maintains a permanent place of business
gas adequate plant and equipment available to do the work
ptoperly and expeditiously f
Bas an adequate financial status to east financial obliga-
tions incident to this work
Ras adequate technical knowledge and practical experience
gas no just or proper claims pending against his oa other
similar work !
Has constructed at least three other projects of similar 3
type, complexity! and scope. Submitted evidence shall cone
list of a listing of each project indicating the Owner's
name, location, approximate dollar vales, type of facility,
sad date of completion.
I
j
(DENTON 10566 6113 CONST 716000OJ
( 062106 Z
I
1 5
i
t
milli
1
M
r ,
i. Qualified prospective bidders will be loaned without charge five copies
of the drawings and specifications which may be obtained from, the Engi-
near (mailing address - $lack & Veatch, P.O. Box 8405, Kansas City,
Missouri 64114, Attentiont Mr. D. P. Ouyot).
All bids must be made on printed contract document forms included in the
specifications.
+
When filed with the Purchasing Agent, each bid shall be accompanied
either by an acceptable bidder's bond, a certified check, or a cashier's
check on any solvent bank, the amount of which shall be not less than ;
5 percent of the amount of the bid. The bid security shall be made pays- +
ble to the City of Denton, Texas. Bid security of the successful bidders j
will be returned when their contracts have been signed, filed with, and
approved by the City. Bid security of unsuccessful bidders will be re-
turned on award of contract or rejection of bids.
No bid m,ay be altered, withdrawn, or resubmitted within 120 days from, and
aftsr the date set for the opening of bids.
The City of Denton, Texas reserves the right to reject any and All bids
g and to waivs defeats in Was
CITI OF DSW!010 TUAS !
John J. Marshall
Purchasing Agent
s
J
r
3
i
1
`DINTON 10566ENCOMIT 11,0000;
062266
A•2
t
tso
f
1 iAq■8i
Ir FJ"ACK & VEATCH
ENGINEBRS•ARCHITSCT3 TEL, 16131 330-2000
1600 MEADOW LAKE PARKWAY
IM' ~7 MAILING ADDRESS R0, e0% NO, 8406
KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64114
i
4
I
} B&V Project 10566
City of Denton, Texas B&V Vila 15.01,00
t Lewisville Hydroelectric Project September 13, 1888
Conference Memorandum TP-3
00
J, I 0 r ~
9 9W
b ` City of Denton, Texas Q p 1
j
i Municipal Building
S
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201 4
Attentions Mr. R. E. Nelson
Oentlemens
Enclosed please find Conference Memorandum TP-3 which covers the discussions
of our meeting in the DB-B offices in Montreal on September 12, 1988.
I ,
Very truly yours,
t
B & VTt
D. P. Ou mvv
Enclosure
i
cc1 Mr. L+. B. Tullos
' Mr. L. V. Harrell
Mr. R. Laney
} Mr. M. Lariviera
Mr. Z' Ho Burney
Mr. P. J. Jermann
i
ff
BLACK & VEArCH
CONFERENCE MEMORANDUM TP-3
City of Denton
Lewisville Hydroelectric Project 36V Project 10566
Turbine-Generator'COntract B&V File 15.0400
September613021988
988
The meeting was held on September 12, 1988 in DO-S offices In Montreal,
Canada. The following personnel attended.
~e Denton .
W
M. Lariviere R,E, Nelson
2,H. Burney* Lloyd V. Harrell D.P. Cuyot
P.J. Jermann* Roland Laney
J
*Indicates part-time attendance.
The purpose of the visit was to discuss the suspension on the project and
possible modifications to the turbine-generator unit if Denton loses their
new conflict for use with Dallas,
~ 1. The City provided DS-S with a background statement regarding their 11
Conflict on the use of the out£all at Lake Lewisville. The City is
actively pursuing all out security of the site or, if required,
negotiating a division of the water with Da114a. Denton hopes to get
a clear answer from Dallas and the VSACOE in two to three weeks.
26 DB-S has placed a hold on the project including their subcontract
suppliers. D8-8 did authorize a few components to be completed,
Overall the turbine-generator fabrication is about 60
complete, The turbine and major components are about 70rton75 percent
complete, The runner Is cast and rough machined. These Components
were scheduled for delivery in December 1988, The generator is about f~
25 percent fabricated, The switohgear engineering is complete, but no
assembly has been started, The balance of all of the other materials
has been ordered and received at the assembly sites.
3. The City inquired about DS-S's view of the secondary market for the
machine. DB-S said that although their S-turbine to promoted as a
standard product, the only portion which is standardised is the ;Dater
Passage, All of the components have to be designed for each site.
One of the key design design parameters is head.
D8-$ bids about 16-25 9-turbines each
units per year, DB-S does not have any yeunitsTthe sitefoftLewisville
to bid on in the near future,
1
I
i
{i
1
BLACK & VEATCH
CONFERENCE MEMORANDUM IP-3
City of Denton 2 B&V Project 10566
Lewisville Elydroelactric Plant September 13, 1988
Turbine-Generator Contract
1
4. The City inquired about their current at-risk position. DB-S said
that the response will depend on the actions of Denton, i,e, cancel
now, cancel in a month, etc. The City indicated that they would like
three options.
a. Cancel now,
b, Take delivery per contract with a release from suspension
on October 1.
c. Suspend indefinitely (costs to date, costs per month, cost
to complete).
Initially, the City would like a range of costs for the
City staff to present to the City Council. The City may then request
more definitive costs.
k
S, The City would also like to examine their alternatives. The following I~
scenarios were discussed.
a. Operating the existing unit at Lewisville with a different s
runner at smaller flows DB-S feels they could put in a six
blade runner and make it work, The primary Impact cost
would be lost efficiency. DS-S does need a good definition
of flow, heads, and tailwater. DB-S needs up to two weeks
to do the engineering study, once authorized.
b, Moving the existing unit to Ray Roberts may also be j
requested, But option as above makes this need less likely.
r i 6. The following "Action Items" resulted from the meeting, j
a, DB-S will provide the City with initial estimates of the
costa for suspension :and/or cancellation.
Action Party: M. Lariviere
Due Datet September 14, 1988
b. B&V will provide DS-S with a work scope description to study
modifying the existing turbine-generator to accommodate
reduced flows in the future.
Action Party: D. F, Guyot
Due Date: September 14, 1988
to DB-S will provide the City a cost to do the study in
response to above,
Action Party,: M, Lariviere
Due Date: September 16, 1988
i
BLACK 6 V E A T C H
CONFERENCE MEMORANDUM TP-3
City of Denton 3 86V Project 10566
September 13, 1988
Lewisville Hydroelectric Plant
Turbine-Generator Contract
d. DS-S will complete the study and provide a letter report in
response to 6b above.
Action Partyt Peter Jermann
Due Dates Two weeks following release (or sooner)
DFG j mw
~ i
E
i
I
lkr
ctry of virmrom, M AS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $66.8200
I
r
MEMORANDUM r
F c~r
DA1'8: September 6, 1988
T0: RALPH XLINKE, SUPT,, OF DISTRIBUTION l~
FROM: R, E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
RE: Service Call 6/23/88• Mrs, Pat Gorton
rrr.rr►rrrrrrr•.►r.rrrr.......r►rrrr..►rr. ....r►r. r►rrrr.......rrr rrrrr
I have been advised that on August 23, 1986, around 10 PM, the power
went out at Mrs, Pat Gorton's neighbor's home, Mrs. Gorton was very
worried about her 87 year old neighbor and when the temperature in
i the home rose to 850, she called the emergency number for
Utilities$
Mrs. Gorton later called the City Manager to express her
appreciation for the quick and courteous response to her call, She
said the staff quickly repaired the problem and evade a followup
inquiry by phone to make sure everything was all right after the
work was completed.
Mrs, Gorton is related to our City Councilman, Bob Gorton, and it is
very gratifying to receive great comments like this and recognition
; from the citizens of the community.
j workse extend my sincere appreciation to the crew for this excellent
I i
'R, Nelson, recut ve Director-
Department of Utilities
gcr
cc: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
E. B. Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
file
60420:1
v
j
1D
CITY of D6NrON, rexAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200
MHMORANDUM
DATE: August 26, 1988
TO: LLOYD HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
y- I PROM: R. H, Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
RE: Lewisville Hydroelectric Project
Y Y Y i Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y___O- Y Y Y Y_ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y- Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
This week, we received a letter from the Corps of Engineers advising
us that they would not sign the contract with Denton granting Denton
easement rights to the outlet works area of the Lewisville Dam until
Denton resolves the claim Dallas has made to the right to tie on to
those outlet pipes. I met with Dallas on two occasions in the past
few days, and they appear determined to proceed with a 10811, 200 MGD
pipeline between the lake and their Carrollton water plant.
Therefore, I regretfully must recommend, and as per your h
concurrence, hY~e temporarily suspended all engineering,
manufacturing an,, construction bidding on this project until we can
resolve this concern with Dallas.
License that Denton
j
The March 27, 1984, Federal Energy Regulatory
i received for this project, we believe, provided us with the water
f flows and rights to the site for hydroelectric purposes. However,
the Corps has discovered a claim in their 1954 contract with Dallas
that expends to Dallas "..the right to use the water supply outlet
facilities for said diversion (i.e., water),." However, it further
states that ",,,the design and location of such future
facilities shall be subject to the approval of the contracting i
officer (i.e., the Corps)..", Denton was not apprised of this fact
until recently, but Denton feels that the Corps approval of j
Denton's 1982 application for the FERC Permit and the subsequent 1
granting of the hERC Permit pre-determined that Dallas connection 1
to the outlet works would have to be on the discharge side of
Denton's hydroelectric turbine,
E
602701
'.i
1
Page 2
Lewisville Hydroelectric Project
We have four possible options.
1, Prevail in the rights to connect to the outlet works either
by:
a. Gallas' withdrawing their pipeline proposal,
drawn Denton out
b access Legally to challengingsite. (This Corps' al long allow
challenge and short term decisions would have to be
made on the turbine)
i
If Dallas prevails or compromise is reached;
2. Continue on with the project with the 2840 KW turbine and
operate it until Dallas installs the pipeline in 1996.
't' hen install a small turbine, possibly a 750 to 1000 KW
' unit, in parallel and use the smaller turbine to capture
the water flows that Dallas does not take through its
pipeline.
3. Re-design the hydroelectric project and install two 750 to
1000 KW units at this time, and capture the water flows
that Dallas does not take.
If the cancellation charges are significant on the turbine,
the engineers believe it could be utilized at the Ray
Roberts site.
4. Abandon the project and utilize the 2800 KW turbine on Ray
i Roberts.
i The Ray Roberts project was originally anticipated to only
i be a 1000 KW turbine, since that was the most compatible
S size for the majority of the flows. However, there are
times when greater flows will exist and the full 2800 KW of
capacity could be utilized for short durations, This could
be beneficial for Ray Roberts Water Plant peak pumping
requirements during the summer.
The financial impact of the possible loss of the Lewisville hydro is
significant in the early life of the project, but a the Lewis in
the last 25-30 years of its 50 year expected life.
unit is expected to generate 121200,000 KWH per year at a cost of
approximately 4.50 to 50 per KWH. This cost includes payment of the
debt service, operating costs and a 6% return on investment to the
General Government. This return on investment to the General
Government represents approximately $220,000 per year initially and
declining by 2% per year (the rate of depreciation), resulting in
lower than lt1he iwat er' anthe d project's
4.50 to0WKWHrelethe life of ctrical ostt project.
t
"Wi
Page 3
Lewisville Hydroelectric Project
wastewater plant now pays and savings of possibly $180,000 per year
are anticipated. After the debt service is paid off in 20 years and
considering energy cost escalation of 58 per year, the savings to
the Water and Wastewater Department could be $l.5 to $2.0 million
per year,
We are attempting to work on this issue on all fronts, technical,
operational, legal and regulatory, and will keep you posted on our
activities.
Respectfully,
i
y
~
s on E ~
R, H, Nel, P,Y.
Executive Director of Utilities
gcr
cc; E.B. T ullos, Director of Electric Services
file
r
,I {
f
I
I
6027Ut2
Mr,w ;l
,wan
i
4i I
aUp~~~~TE.
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
August 24, 1988
Mr, David Guyot
Black 0 Veatch
j 1500 Meadow Lake Parkway
Kansas City, MO 64114
REt Lewisville Hydroelectric Turbine
Dear Davidt
This to to confirm my verbal instructions to Bruce Ainsworth on
Monday, August 22, 1988, regarding the Lewisville Hydroelectric
Turbine, Please suspend all Engineering, General Construction,
Bidding Processes, and Turbine Manufacturing activities on this
project until further notics!.
The City of Dallas has reversed all previous positions of
support to Denton on this project, and presently plan to
attempt to preempt Denton's PERC license and tie on to the Lake
I Lewisville outlet works with a 108" pipeline, capable of
carrying 200 mgd, Dallas will commit only to releasing 35 mgd
to the river, and if Dallas should prevail in this attempt to
preempt Denton's PERC license, the 35 mgd flow will not be
sufficient to operate the 21800 KW turbine.
We will be in contact with you as soon as possible to determine
the next course of action, I
Yours very truly,
rX
R. E, Nelson, Executive Director
of Utilities
kkn
cct VLioyd Harrell, Denton's City Manager
Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
Joe Cherri, Electrical Engineer
Pile
5628U359
i
I
f
MAR 2 51888
CI~Y~it"t [ifrJ7tiP!
1
D
CITY MAN 06 CF(4Cf y
CITY of DENTON DENTON, TEXAS mgot
MEMORANDUM
DATE; March 25, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
LLOYD HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
PROM: R. B. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
RE: UTILITY ISSUES
. r. r. r. r. r.
r
Lewisville Hydroelectric Project
R Now that we have all of the TMPA contractual concerns with our
Lewisville Hydro behind us, we are working hard to resolve our
concerns with Dallas, However, on March 9, 1988, we had to ask
Black and Veatch to stop all construction engineering work on the
project until we could better determine our position with Dallas,
The turbine manufacturer, Dominion Bridge, is continuing with shop
drawing engineering and has authorized fabrication of one item on
the turbine. We have also made our first payment of a III
pproximately
$67,000 on the turbine. These steps are all necessary to protect
our license, and we have forwarded all necessary evidence of these
actions to the PERC as per their request. f ^
I ,
Our Engineers, Black and Veatch, met with Dallas' consulting
engineers, Camp, Dresser and McKee (CDM), on Monday, After
f reviewing Dallas technical plan, our engineers have expressed
that
the cost for the Dallas pipeline seems very expensive for the
benefits that can be derived. We plan to schedule a meeting with
Dallas officials during the first week of April to determine whether
we need to slow down our work any more or proceed onward,
Ray Roberts/Lewisville Lake Operational Committee Meeting
David Ham, Howard Martin and I met with Dallas operational and
wholesale contracts personnel Monday, along with the Utility
Director from Lewisville, for our semi-annual Lewisville and Ray
Roberts Lake Operational Committee meeting, This committee was
established by our 1985 water contract with Dallas to regularly keep
each other informed on how the Lakes are operated.
Dallas advised us they are changing their operation procedures on
Lewisville to stop overdrafting when Lewisville gets one foot below
conservation level of 51S. Previously, they overdrafted, i,e,,
i
7
"withdrew", as much water as the west side of their system could
use, until Lewisville was half empty, then they underdrafted, i.e.,
"withdrew", less than the safe yield of 95 MGD, and made up the
difference byy pumping water from their east Texas lakes of Ray
Hubbard and Tawakani. Their reason for this operational change is
to let Ray Roberts Lake fill as soon as possible which then gives
Dallas and Denton greater "safe yield" volumes from the Elm Mork
and, thereby, Dallas can delay by one or two years, the installation
of some very expensive pipilines to Lake Pork and Palestine. In the
meantime only minimum water i
is bean released from Ra Roberts Lake,
This action is good for Denton since it allows an earlier fill date
and we get more of our water from Ray Roberts and have to buy less
from Dallas. Ray Roberts Lake already has over 130,000 acre feet
which gives us over 600,000 gallons per day which saves us
approximately $200 per day. We believe that by September, we will
have 2,6 MGD available from Ray Roberts, which is an average of 1.1
MGD for fiscal 1988, resulting in reduced water purchases from
Dallas in the area of $120,000.
Dallas did express that they will be placing Ray Roberts capital j
costs in their wholesale water rate base in 1989. and the cost of raw
water is expected to increase from 311 per 1000 gallons to 441 per
1000 gallons, a 411 increase.
We continue to get mixed signals from the Corpa as to whether they {
will finish their highway work on the east side of Lewisville Lake I
{ by July 30, 1968, If this work is completed on schedule, the Corps
will begin filling Lewisville an additional seven feet and this
signals the completion of the Ray Roberts/Lewisville Reservoir
project and triggers the first annual payment of approximately
$10900,000. We are continuing to keep that expenditure in our 1988
budget,
i Lake Cities Municipal Utility Authority
r
I met with Marty Highbaugh, General Manager of Lake Cities Municipal
Utility Authority, Tuesday to review LCMUA's previous request to buy
1,000,000 gallons per day capacity from our new Ray Roberts water
plant. We also discussed possible wholesale sewer service to the
northwest section of Shady Shores sometime in the future. LCMUA is
certified to serve that area although they do not have service there
at this time, Also discussed was the concept of running a large
water transmission line from Denton to Lewisville or Highland
Village either along I.35E or down 2181 along the proposed route of
the highway to the Airport. Such a line would probably cost around
$4,000,000.
Such a line would tie Denton's system together with LCMUA and
Lewisville, and thereby, possibly allow some of the South Central
i
Denton counties
cities an opportunity to participate with us in
building the Ray Roberts Water Plant. This might allow us to get
some very good economies of scale by enlarging that plant from a 10
MGD to a 20 MGD. Then as south Denton County cities' requirements
I
' 1
411
p ' Increase
area i' and they find it feasible to begin a ma s
y or plant in their
t would release capacity from the Ra
Denton and the north county service area. This concept tis ina at most
preliminary stage and of course will need substantial study and
coordination,
Denton County Water Study
r
1 met with the Denton Water Study "Blue Ribbon" Im
t
Committee, Monday morning, They are priorities
work
plans to help bring the information fabout athe DentontCountydWater
and Wastewater Study to the residents and decision makers of the
county. We have another half day meeting scheduled for next Monday.
We received verbal notification this week the
Development Board has given final approval toatthe D tTexaas Water
Water/Wastewater Study document. Therefore we have now uthorized
the engineering firm to print some 300 copies of that study, which
will be available for distribution in two or three weeks.
No. 5 Turbine Generator
-f We received some bad news this week regarding the main bearings on
our No, 5 turbine generator. We are underway with a mini overhaul of
the unit and have discovered that the bearings are very rough. This
may necessitate taking the turbine to the General Electric shops and
rebuilding the shaft and bearings. If we do have to do this, it
could be June before we get the unit back on line, but it should not
affect our ability to serve our summer peak, We'll keeon this.
p you posted
Res ectfully,
f R. E. Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities ~
i
gcr
I
r F
I
;
I°
5411U;1.3
i
r
ciry of D<NrON ONNr0N, 79"S 70201
i
MEMORANDUM
DATE, March 119 1988
T0: LLOYD V. HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
l
FROM,. R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
'i
RE, Lewisville Hydroelectric Project.
' Y.1._N..Y..1MYY........ Y M .._....._.Y_....r ......Y.N....1..r.. ICI
This is a followup of my earlier verbal report to you on the recent
concerns that have developed on the Lewisville Hydro project, As I ;
mentioned, Dallas has reactivated a study of the feasibility of
running a 108119 15 million gallon per day pipeline from the outlet
{ of the Lewisville Lake to their Carrollton water plant. The
1 critical issue here is whether Dallas would attempt to claim the
rights to the water pressure available at the Lewisville Outlet
works, Denton's Washington attorney believes Denton has the right to
y this water pressure, However, Dallas has not firmly claimed that
1 and it will be May 1st before they complete their study, DPiton has
a deadline of March 27th to have the engineering drawings is,to PERC.
Dallas had begun a study of that concept approximately the time we
received our FERC license, They subsequently discontinued the study
? and advised me that the concept was not feasible. However, now they
have scaled back the size of the pipeline and would plan only to
i extend it to their Carrollton plant, rather than all the way to
their Baccman Plant and, with these modifications and the concern
about water polution in the river between Lewisville and Carrollton,
Dallas now believes the concept is feasible.
Dallas has a 1953 contract with the Corps which states Dallas may
take water at the outlet of Lewisville subject to the "Contracting
j Officer" (i.e., the Corps') approval, Dallas supported Denton in
obtaining our license and we, at present, have found no documents
qualifying that support, such as a statement like..."..subject to
Dallas' future utilization of the water pressure, etc. The
Corps also approved our tieing on to the outlet works and again, we
find no qualifying documentation. Our Washington attorney believes '
that the Corps, by supporting Denton's FERC license and connection
to the outlet works, has established that Dallas would not be
allowed to take water at the outlet works pipes but rather at a
1 location past where Denton's hydroelectric unit is located.
~ ,i
Dallas has asked their engineers to include two possible
alternatives to connecting the outlet pipes, These would be:
1, build a larger pipeline that would not require as much '
pressure to force the 150 MGD through the pipe and,
2, build a pumping station at the outlet of Denton's
hydroelectric unit,
If Dallas does indeed have the rights to the water pressure, the
alternatives available to Denton are:
1. Scale down the Lewisville project,
This would siecessitate some redesign work, but since f
nothing has been constructed, the cost should not be too
great, If Dallas utilizes the 150 MGD, it will decrease
the annual energy output from 120000,000 KWHs to 40000,000
KWHs which may jeopardize the financial feasibility,
2. Re-design the Lewisville unit for installation in Ray
Roberts,
Our attorney in Washington advised that we should proceed with the
shop drawings and submit thmm to FERC to be certain we retain the
license, We are continuing to explore all areas and are working
with various attorneys to bring this to an early resolve.
Re.;lpectfu1
R. H, Nelson Utilities llirectnr
Department ol
3
gcr
cc: E, B, Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney
file f
I
i
I
r
i
I
5390U
WWI
9aeY 1
>:naS+14
a+~ 2 2l4 00 4030 DLS WYR UYL 02 M,y,,,,, II , ' I C~NTRACTDR'8 CQ~' ,1,:. A~
FEES . lyo~
1
.o I 1 ,
contract woo AI; 'L4.' %&940 - R,,r
,~AT10~N 8TC„RAO~
AIR !fM VO
THIS COMPACT# entered into this da of
A. a. 19531 by and between the VlU1'iri JUI
!'~9 AM%-I u► ail' `Mir called
the Oovernmeent) opted by the Contracti Off cor a"inng
this
and the 01, Or AUM$ n instrow"ta ltv of the tltatoor Tea e
(hor6lufter eallod the city), wiramm RAT,
WH E1Mp the 0overmoub is constructing the Oarsawlittle SU Dpe
Asserroir on the Mal York of the Tr dty River in Denton ComAys Teauaolhovew
matter called t at) pursuant the authority contained in the Rives 00
and Harbor Act a P March L9V (rublio Lax 1144p 79th Ooraosss Lt die
t Sion)I am#
W109 dp the Aaoxetary of Mar is authorised by the We t
Appropriation Ace 1938 approved 19 July 1937 (PubLie Law Q~Congresss
let session)$ Nte move from States and p utioel eubdivisdons thereof ~
such funds as may be contributed by them to be expended in conmetion wi$lh
E funds appropriated by tohee VVnited States for a* authorised now control work
whonover such work &M ncoemMation of the Mid of ZwAreorr as adranttaagom in t ppa~bb%loare
4 o
intorest# and the plans for any resorroir pro3eot wy# in the disoretion of
the Secretary of Mar oa ro:Am eWation of the Chief of >tsgineeroi be sedi•
tied to pebvids makom%. storage oa ty for dom etio water rappll► or
other oonservatios storage op condition that the oat of snob iaereasea
storage capacity is oontsi4utod by load agencies and that the Local agencies j
f agree to utti3ise each additional storage eapaeity in aOmar co"Lotont with
federal uses and p"osel Ands provided further that when centributiens
made by States and Pelitse4 wNivisdom th ;Q0 are in amts of the
actual cost Of the work fed and properly chargeable to snob coutri•
buttons nwh excess cont~acM mayo with the approval) of the Secretary
of Ware be returned to the proper representatives of the contributing
i,ntsr"toyN old$
WMrW# the City by Resolution emoted 98 S
Council assured the Meretary of the Arq that it wwe dapw3$48 by the City
ohase A0e0M
aoroofeot of conserl►atleal storage span is the preppeesod preJeoa by 0e6tri• f
buting the inerementall cost of aueh Storage space in the appsWdUts aaoaat t,
Of $30%woo 0, and, AM" M M era 44 SO"
M:14
I ~ r
j
1 ~
1 ,
~I
ti
1 i
I 1 I
1
1 S 214 870 4938 D63 WTR UTL 03
, tlalre.+♦~
• M 1 1
1 1 1 ♦ ♦ 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 • ♦l
1
1
iNNK.61 WWW the City by liosolution enaoted MAY 131953
by the City 6ounoil assured the Secretary *1 Iraq a wo 000'47
to the Oovemment ali of its rirhtp ti.t1o0 intareet aid estate in and to all
of the lands and appurtenances heretofore acquired by the City of Dal1U in
connection with the establishooent construction and saintemnae of that part
of the City4s water system aener2lr known as Oarsa Dow and the Reservoir
lasowh as Lake Da11as in Denton County0 TWA# am and swept a treat of
land containing 4,53.37 acres acquired by the City of 04JAm on R'ebrwu7 7
1921, by deed recorded in Book at pale 1,A~ of the need Reoads
of Denton County0 Tom; andi
WSMASO pursuant to the Resolution heroinabore referred to and
suant to the wax Civii Appropuriation dot 19 approved IMOV
1937# (Public Law 7
in t Oor4roos 1st desrien) ~h• contributa4 tondo
he amount of $5000000400 to the ~o mmati ands,
MUSS heretofore on the 22nd day of October 19$60 the deoretary of
the Ar~~ approved the a406pums of contributed funds in the aft"t of
$500 000.00 frow the OitrO to be applied u part paw 0 on the oost of
prav~dind stage space or the domestic water sapp2n aard0
WOWS heretofore on the 011th day of Novo" L9510 vw mont the
war t Oivi1 Apprs riation Act 19)b0 approved 14 ITta► 1931 (hblie
Law 29 th ss ' 1st mosal,on) t~• City ooatributed additiond Panda
in the arwunt 70+300.00 to the OoYemmntj WAS
WFaSW the dAtr desirae to sequin s~h~aoae in the reservoir s
in the of 4150000 04NA •et eonsi•tinc 7 000 aor••fat of
omhade storage space and U0#000-aor•4e•t of storage space to be a4gdrv4
at the cost of ynvtdtaf owl MW$
WlfSWj on 20 :unw l►1949 the beard of water Engineers tor ~ t~.he
State of Tuaw granted a permit to the Oity of Dallas to lmpo*A W,30000 3
acrafat of water in the O m4Attie Ma Rasernoir sad to divert sad
appropriate publie watoro therefrom in an mount not to aamosd 41S 000
aoredoot of inter per amrm4 subjeot to the authorisatim of this 44 of
Corps of b4naera and sash restrietions0 conditioas0 ad lidtatiens as
the said Board mW 4m peesp s wader the Imp rules end raduiatiew of the
Board and subject to the rishts of Vior appropriatons
NOW0 MOM0 this parties hereto do mtv& r air" as followsa
J ~ ' Par er as This City ~ have this right to
utilise an Video . 0 or the stage spae• in the pr~go,~•ot
between slevatioa 4hoO feet above roan sM 1sw1 and elevation 313.0
fat above man sea Uvd as daamod mo•sury by this City toimp,pmad in
the lroj•at and !sake wolf diversions as planted to the Y by the Beard u~
of Water Engineers ter the State of VOW or its su••eseor. t• the
Batt nt that suah stersto opine w!]1 pa~•vi~e0 and nub h• rebeatiery
; s
br the Ooverrm nt and others of the rominila r mxmN.g $•e per cent of
C
I . 1
V ~
1
1
t
1 1
1 ,
r ~
1
I
;
+b7CN~Y
$ 214 V0 4030 OLS WTR UTL
4W1 04
♦.y. wel+amy
4 41
the storago rpaee for such purposes u the Coverawsnt way dseai adeiubhe•
The Government shalt not be responat,blo for diversion by othorss nor will
it become a party to VW ooatroversiss between users of the aforesaid
storage space.
The City shall have the right to use the Water outlet facilities
for said diversions from the Project as constructed = Gonrmeat Is
accordance with a roved by the City on 16 Atustuot 1950# hereinafter
called the outlet faailstiese
The design and location of any future City installations and faoiliti"
that the City RAy construct for the purpose of eomwoting to the conservation '
storage shall be subseot tto the applrora of the Contracting Officer# and the
cost of such iastali'ations or facilities shall be borne by the City* he
City of Dallas shall bars the right to We the water below the GarswLittle
if thheC ity soe dosirii Sclosed s wad transport the Water#mob lloocations aso
~
ths
City mw deairo ter its own uwe
r
1 The GovenwrA reserves the right to tale nab measures as my be
necessary in the operation of the Project to preserve life andd/or poroperty#
• , (a) The City shall without any additional.
oenei e~eo~ and sufficient deed of oonveyanes# all of its
rights# title interest and estate in and to all of the lauds sad apparta«
sancos horeto#ore aoeluirod by the City in connection with the satablishorAl
construotion# and Raintenanca of that part of the city's %a-sr system
ensrally known as Cam Dom and the Reservoir known as LAks Ullaal in
Denton County# Tuw# it being intended that the oonvsyeace shall include
the Dag and oil lards and apparteawnoes lying and situate within the
Covenant Pra3eet known as GwesawLittle Ila Reservoirs with the exeeptios 14
of a certain tract of land below Gam D w consisting of W3637 acres
{
aoquired the City Pabroaq 7# 1475# by %ad recorded in Book
at Page 02 the 1leate count Records subject to existing is►assn
for pub o roads and highways# lie utilities railroads and pipe liass#
onepting and reserving to the hoeswr eii gas strwewl# Sande
or other ninersls in and under said lard aa~ subject#to a{i outstanding
ftnaral leaser and royalty interests if any *Atsoevsr together with
j the right of ingress and egress for ks purpose of drill 4 for and prom
during oil, as# and other sdnorLIs and for sing and ~V at sand mad
! graven previded that the Contracting Officer shall approve in furtheranes
d such snuitatd,on the location of ow structures and/or appartanasess
thereto wdeting or to be erected or constructed in connection with such
exploitations and providing further that arq erg Wtation within the
reservoir area be and is subordinated to Ohs rights of the Vaitsd etatss
to flood Me area psraunntly or btuvittontly in eoanetica with the S
oopp~~ ties and Raintenasos of the Garsa4'dttts Btu lbsardr Prod"t on
ttri 4 ork of the Tritity River in the Triadly Mar >lsaix$ Toms and
3
i
s
i
i
{
t
1
~k
a 214 690 4010 OLS 11IR UTL r CS r.. + {ppMplj
1 1 1 1
0pwand to aaoh ether terms and conditions ra the Secretary of the AnW shalt
prescribe from tints to tine in order to properly nroteot the interest of
the united States in ad$soeat Oowr=autrowned lssds and avoid the riola•
~e1Y~
pf the rights which others my have tbsreinr
or, OW .
4 vided further ~sot to the saws restriotionsa conditions and limitations
reinabo0To set eute'the City shall have the right to locate drilling rigs or
adJaMnt Oorornment owned land for the purpose of perferaing direotionat
drilling to rooover oil on lands now owed by the ty and which will, be
transferred to the Coromentr
(b) In the Pft%* the lands end appurteswaes to be conreyed by the City
to the Gowrnmant as paavided herein shah no longer be used by the Oovernsuat
for the parposes for which oonvayrd# urAyr flood control and allied purpossap
the interest in snob undo conveyed by the City to the OovwaoAent shall than
revert to and becotso the property of the Cityi and the City "I have the
right to ra-enter and take posnasion of the pa~ope and utilize it for such
purposes as it ahN' deoirs or it my dispose 0 the 4as~1 as hereinafter
provided. Lt the went tare should be a gradual, MU g in thof the e City oorvoir
and at such tutee should that portion of the properties ftob
Dallas is conveying to the Govenwsat no longer be needed or used for AAA
control and alliod prjosesa than and in that went the City and the 80wrriW
cant ir.11 negotiate for a rotor of say such p ftm of the lands to the
City of Dallase
i (a) The torsi of the deed to be used In the ooWWWO from the City to
{ the Goverment is attaobed hereto in S*Abit NAM and to a part of this
oontraote ,
(d) The City shall has the right to remove at its etrpenae all baildinpa
housesi the bridge over the pa+ssent Dan and 8pLl VW, ooettrol tacks and other
ishproreaants boated on the said rporty witMa 1e6 doo after notice of
raM oval in writing has boon wrvod on the 01,► by the ao' nori+e ]'.n the
event the buildings+ hoitNSe the bridge over the present Dash sod spd.11war+
control works and other iaproreranta are not nW*d within the tiff spadaed
abovea title thereto sh&= rest in the Oovermnat• Who and it dotomi"d
necessary by the dawsruimt, breaahing of the sdtllUM Garsa Dar shall be
pertornad by the amraaw% at its costa but such breach of the Dash shai,l root
be aooo lashed until the conssrration storage And at", faoilitdes in Garsw
Little am opto the eabloo for daliv*W of water without detrirsnt to the 414#0
(a) TM 'City sbvl fUUy porfom its obligatim as set forth in this
Artiole 2 within a reasonable tics after date of Maution of this contract
j
and in any went not later thin such eiaa w the fro$sot bacorea operative
for Witt e~ conservation parpoaM as speed aeon by the Contracting Cffiew A
aM the city of 9413,
(f) in the Brant for art reason the right, titles interest acrd extent
of the astata in and to the ]lads that the City w= o00'ay to the Govrrmot
shall be questiowda and additiond esdnent domin or odsL prooeadirgs 3
are necessary to be iastitutsd by the Oorsrppante the ~r shalt oooporate is
the W%+ofiscution of the peroaMdings and this agreareat shalli without novae
oeastituta a stipulation Moiah arty be ftW in the Wooeediko and be final
4 3
c,
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 V
f'
51
a
~ I
e.'CMn °aY'
lafRt.M
E 214 670 4030 065 WTR U% 06 1,
i
and conclusive evidence that the awslyd for the taking of such interest in
said lands shall be one dollar and the beastits to the City provided in this
contract. In the went this agreement is tiled in such pramdindss it AM
constitute an appearaaoe and wriver of all righ tts to service of sumns or
other process and the right to the appointment of ConnLesioners or a jury to
fix an awand, All such proosediags ahall be vithout cost to the City of
Dallas•
(g) The 41by s!u►ll furtdsh► with the delivery of the deed to said 2aadss 1
all abstracts of. itlsi certificates of title$ aratiw instrunents# deeds
judgments and other irdiota of title obtained by the nit at the ties of the
# acquisition of slid lands by the City# all of which shah be returned to the
City by the Oovermeent upon app wal of the title and the convgea ob thereof
contutplated herein by the Attorney Oowrsl, of the United 8tatess the Mar
Advoaate General of the Arsy or other authorised officials lire t •
be under no obligation to brim the abstracts of title up to dates U the
ssrw will be fwrtdshed as of the Use the Oily aequired the propertyo
such storage • The City grses that the utilisation of
pave no conflict with the uss of the Project by the
r OaveMAOt for !hood oontrbl and allied puVposes•
92UNON of PW The
rrgulaita o~uw o
Water • 4 ore Storage "*a ~ wt
be ocnsidered a part of this contraot• The 0it sha:u hive the right at
ingrese and egress for the p wpew of wahd,ng fu use of the rights prow
vidsd hersins inoludiag the right to protect its water supply'.
MM OO ~OQ~. For and in consideration of the tollowiags
(1) The contributions by the City of the nest of ding that
R rt+ of the storage spas to be utilised by the Oily as in ArUohe 1
y inn e:ceess of the storage oapaeity in Labs Dallas receipt di W16000 " par/ f
of the oontribution on said cost being hereby ao?t►oM,edged$ Ards i
(2) The aontribation by thw City of that part at the oil of 3
oonstruoting mid outlet faoilitdrs ihiah'represents a bettskmt to the
city's ads" sdadhr type tsoilitia at Lake Daum) ands
(3) '.tlw oontribution by the Oily at the cost of operation W
mnaintMAWO of the said storagespaa sad outlet tacilitiw set forth in
Article to u de izod under Article 6• v
(b) Thw coursyanas by the City to the O ywrAwat of all its
rights title and interest to all lands and appurteaaoes anodrod in cone
motion with the erbeblithuntr constructun and wintown s of tMat paft
of the Chyme voter systole generally Iftya N 0* Dallis in Denton QountOrs
Texup subjeat to the re"rrations set forth .Artsels Sp ,
i
i
N1tVIN v:..'hlt
nA.~ S 214 670 4639 DLS UTR UTL 07 r" '
r
1 I
THS OOMNMENT chaff provide the City the storage space ar! k outlet
t,
facilities as set forth in Article 19
(a) In accordance with the provisions of Article
5 of a con ~aoe ity shall contribute the folloWibg RUN to the 00"M-
mrntt
(1) 82#643 o65i50 which is the remaining satinted balance of the cost
of providing that portion of the storage "as to be utilised by the City as
stated in Artiole 1# in excess of Via storage capacity in Lake Dallas ins
oluding the additional coot of construating said outlet facilities suitable
to the City's present needs which sunol shall be oontributed;in the following
inetahUnentel '
$1#23),000.00 on or baton 30 June 103
#000#00 on or before 1 December 61
00000.00 an or before 1 Me 195 f
f
and 110 065A upon dete"dnaticn of fL1141 preO4e0t 001Elo It is fW%her
rovid;A that the 01* shall have the Lion ysyirwg ii Gi)O000s00 is mw
~asbaLisrsoat on or before 1 Pebru m 1954 in lieu of the Xrs= iastallwwasts
r due on or baton 1 Dooember 1953 and 1 March 1954• in the event of default in
the contribution of any one of the aforementioned instaiLsnts# the City Moll
~
pay interest on such overdw inataLlaiewstr at the rate of three percent 3$)
per annual thsrsonf end such interest shall be charged !rata the date such
inetall:ees►t is due uatilr paid. j
(2) 2100 of the annual actual experienced cost of operation and mains
venanoe of the Project which includes the entire operation arA maintenwa {
oost of the said outlet facilities and excludes operation and maintenance
cost for lend m#TUaemsnt sad public utillsatione An advance payewnt in the
amowrt of 112#57'5.00 shall be wads on the tirst day (October 1) of the water
year that the Pro6sot will beta" operatiw !er tester aonserration pasrposos
thereafter an an anthe t equal totho Officer and, said amrA actuCity of al o ape massi cost eAt oopiration
I grid maintenance for the prscsding povenment flood year shall be paid in advmoe
I on the lot day of October for each suooeoding year durim the contract period.
The advanas oeymont for the second yywearr shah, be increased or de recce in an
amount to reflect the difference bettaen the l itial ppsaymot of 12#575.00 E,
-wa. for the first year and 21ot% of the annual aotua emerienoed cost of
o;,o;etion and maintenance for the first year or portion thand as "t. forth
abovao It is further provided that additional contributicns shall be made by
the City for ma►intsnswo cost not armwlly recurring# at the saw rate of ,
21. of actual cost. %tems of operation and maintenance ouich form basis of
computation and uhioh itla, be used its future computation of operation and
mintenance charts art included as %ftbit sb"o .
The extent o. ooppeeration and wsintenanee of the P>,oseet shall, be determined
by the ContraotiAl Offioelr and all records and ae0e be addition
by the Contraoting'Offioes~e 16 the O"M the Oity ohWA
operation and maintenance for the oonser"tion storage over sad above that
t
E
y
218 b7J J OLS WTR UYL 0A
1 ' ' , W4l?ri1 I~
I r ' I
I' 1 1 r 1
I 1 r r
M
datermined b the Contracting Officer and over and above that which forced
1 the basis for deterrdnatrion of the above percentages so Not, Out in E' bit a
which includes the entire operation and rfaiiat'6n nos of the outlet faoilitiMa
,,,he City shall bear the entire coat of such additional expaare•
(,l) 27% of the wasor replacement coats on the outlet structure when
incurred.
(h) 47.60 of the total, eedinentation resurvey Costs when inourred•
(5} In the sy t of dotault in the payment of the casts contained in
Artiioele 6 (a) (2) (3J am (u)a the Citdr shall, pay Interest on such overdue
til, paid.
interest shell be charged from ttheedate such pgrnnts are dwi unand suoh
(b) In the event the totual coat at oonstruction to provide storage
IF "a to be util isad by the Oiltr as stated in Article 1 lit access of the
storage oapaoity in bake nallast including the said adddtional oat of oon»
truoti said out%6% laoilitiea set out horein "oseds he satiated cost of
r ~h4l0+06540 the aforesaid unpaid estiasated balance of 90 065,*50 shall be
increased %a reflect the said actual first cost of oonstruerun as detereaine4
by the Contract~ Officers It such 40*4 cost is leas than, the estimated
cost of ~JaLlOi06 @500 the atfratid oatin►tod balanoe of K0000#50 shaU
be deoreaeed to refloat the actual tint Boat of construction as dateresined
by the Contraoting Officers
AMIMAN An AV . (a) fto oontraot shall becom effectr
ive SwX3t ►e dates o 0 verment ooelsraaoes operstiLm at the Prbyeat
` or the data on which the City first reosives water trek the Prewota whichever
' occue the later acrd sball oontiruts in full force and afoot thereafter'
durinr the useful We of the ProJeect• ~h MAY shall have the full use and
benefit of the said storage space during
(b) It is the underataAlag of the parties hereto that the Goverment
does not hereby obligate Malt to oontinue operation of the Project for 1►
period in excess of 50 yowl or beyond the useful lift of the Prossot !or k
flood control and &=ad pwposeoa fteha sr first occurs. It is the
expectation of the parties- a hewvora that the Proyeot fr,1► have a uselvcl
1Sfe for such purposes in amess of 50 roari it and it is understood and agreed
.that the bovemmont fay aentiaw operation the Pro sot for any additional
tares beyond malt time subsoat to toad haation at the worms ttss olootdone
in a" events should W 0ovearnrearst aban don or disoontiaue the 4
- Project u no longer usatdi for oeatrei and aLtiiod peseta or for
ha]3 beeoate elfaot»
wW other causes ths.reverden provided for in Arbiols 2 e right ed'
ive at that UAij ands M betwson the ao"numb and the Oily trA the latUM is hereby r thmdter to utilifse the storage spars to f'
the lull extent provided for ift this contrast for the ptu'pom !or ridah the
City hereunder is o"toribatLat its money Without further obligation ea the
part of the 0overnfront•
1
1 i
4
{
I ;
i
I •
I r
K No
N1
rrnea E 214 670 4030 0Li OR UTL 09 ucalrs
0 • AA } }1,A,Ilt Thy Government shall operate and
Maintain the Frojoat own by the o"riMnt• The City shall be rerponsibie
for the operation and m►intenance of all features and appurtenanoer to be
r vided and owned the City for withdrawal of water from the reservoir.
" city shall have the right to make withdrawals of water for its prpossor
as needed in sooordanos with Artiole 1• In the went the Govarmon Could
temporarily euspeni maintananoe and operation of the Project due to look of
appropriated funds than and in that event the City rhali be privileged and 1
shall have the right to enter, upon the premisee and operate the same for its
own use and benefit in supplying itself with water to the extent provided in
this oontraot•
• d • ft City shall.' hold and save the Govorn+
unto i1 r oers$ apntse wand er*],oyewi harmless frog liability
of uq nature or kind for or on aooount of ollaia for damages which my
be filed or asserted N a rewlt of withdrawal of Mater from the PAservoisr
by the Cit s or as a result of the oonstrnetioa operations or Wntoomwe '
of the features or appurtewsnaes owned Operated, or added the City.
Howw ors it is agreed and understood gnat it it sot the intention of the
( foregoing to impoe liability upon the City for clad that may be assented
by the Governsrnt eonoasieoa0e4
AA • 3 . 'she City shall not transfer or
aesus-tM a Awl y r ~ao~trid thereuatier nor subsilot said
oonsarvation Ac rage space or any part thereofs nor g~ am interest
priTnege or license whatsoever in ocuneotion with this agrieas Aj wit{feu4
permission in writing fm the 8eoretary Of the Atwprl pe*vided that to
restriction shall, not be construed to apply to any 'star which I" be
obtained from the owservation ~e by, a City and furnir?ad us
third party or parties Nov say of allooatien thereas
Ctrs W. EN , NO masber of or delegate to
Congress or reridsn e es ones @MU be admitted to art share or
of this oontraot$ or to &W benerid, that say -sse therefromt but this
provisition~ its geaeconot. benefit, extend wtthis odsttraot it U40 with a
l 1
I
MMAW" MVP f 22 964 }fig. The city warrants that
ne person or 0 NOW as eon 4"loy" or retained to solicit or
aacure this caatrao upon as agreewt or understanding for a commissions
peroantages brokerages or eentingent fee excepting bons fide ample s or
bona fide established oommtroial or sea 4 agenoiss raiutwined 1rj the ages
for the pun"" of securing business• rev breach or Violation of this }
warranty the Gevernm u4 shall haw the right to anm►l this co*tract without ^
liability or in its disoretiod to add to he caatraot prise or oonsiftr6tion
the full smut of saoh oosnissions parcenbages bro}arage, or contingent
i
s:
i
8 ,
i
r•
Aa
N A
1i
tl4 MpMN
SC 214 670 4030 DLS WTR UTL to • . X'roept as otherwise provided in this contracts
Any aqquutie oonoe ng a question of fact arising under this contract which
is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Oontraoting Offioeri
who shall, reduce his decision to wriUr4 and pail or otherwise furnish a copy'
thereof to the Oitq. W%ft s 90 days from the data of reoeipb of eaah copy
the City may appeal by mailing or otherwise furnishi to the Oontraatir4
Officer a written appeal addressed to the eeorstary of the Arsys and the
decision of the Secretary of the Array or his duly authorised representative
for the hearing of such appeals shat s unless determined by a Court of
ooeq»tent jurisdiction to have been fraudulents arbitrar~►0 oapricioass or
so grossly erroneous as nsoessarily to LxpIr bad faiths 6s final and
aonolusive= dad that it ao suoh appeal, is UMas the decision of
the Contras Officer sLil be final and conolussve• xn oonnooticn
with any appppse prooseding under this olausss the Oity'shall be afforded
an o portunsty to be he aid to offer evidence in support of its appeal.
Pending find doaision of a dispute herewmkrs the City shall prooee
diligently with the perforwnee of the oontraot and in scoordanos with
the OontractiAg Officals decision.
This contract shallb e sab$et to , o Oscm of the repperesentativess a1and► shalh snot bias ipg untilsappor his ddy roved# a+►thorised ftO of
the W-iF NJ O (a) The u used hersi inn shall has o'GOOMAST
ne AM
the same meaning and the terns "his duly authoriaad raprseentativee shall,
~theChief ~erse Deoartmant of the Angro or U indiKdual or
(b) Wopt for the orSIinat s~gadA* of this eoatraot and except as
other wd h stated hereins the terms 4 ntracting bffieW u need heroin
shall include ble dins appointed suooessor or his authassed reprssentatiVes
• . This contract is aubhoriaed by and j
ad
" got~i~r t wu The Mwr and Act' EMIRIth
1 tub
hie Lw fth rs 1s0 /ss sad w'begat
Civil Appropriation A 3 s*pv+sved l Jall► 207 ~ LW 00W
Mot 1st oerrl4n)•
i
t
04
' I
' S
.
i
1
S 214 670 4033 OLS VTR UTl j~
e
n•r
,
. II
' y • • ,Igln.
IN WITS r OMW bhp parbia hoeto barn moiA W ahio a moftab
N of %ha day am ywr t"iM 4bow tints.
aTAT!'d t
TWO WITMM e '
I
i 01 AM
ffAk4,
of, S. K4"
cow" "W ~
0~'x Oh ' ~A1S~~ T]E~A!! ~
I
r AMNs ,
UIV j
+ Cori o Qlv •
AltXM A8 X YON4
H14+"C.+and.+'t~
/
1
r
1 ,
.
r
~~~tYMMMppp1lN~~p MA
■ JIWflMi(
QIrY of ORNrON, rxXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200
Oscember 90 1987
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
730 Peachtree Street, NE V~J
Atianta, Georgia 30308
ATTNs Mr. Aerne D, Kouranen, Regional Director
1
`t Gentlemeno
In response to your September 4, 1987, letter, the City encloses a revised project
schedule. This schedule identifies the timing of verlous design consultations to be '
conducted by the City and Its Engineer, Black and Veatch, with your office and the
UsS. Army Corps of Engineers.
Denton awarded the contract for the turbine generator to Dominion Bridge-Sulzer
on December % 1987s This schedule demonstrates that the City will comply with the
Meroh 241 1989, start of construction deadline by initiating fabrication of the
turbine-generator by Dominion Bridge-Sulzer by that date. 9'noe the
turbine-ggenerator fabrication does not Involve activities covered by the QA Plan,
the QA Plan will be submitted to your office prior to the start of field oonstruction
activities.
! Please contact David Guym of Block and Veatch at (913) 339.2424 if you have any
questions about this achedule.
Reepa~rully,~
R. Ea Nelson, P.E.
Executive Director of Utilities
~I
col Black & VestoN Consulting Engineers
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
Ernie Tullos, Dlreotor of Electric Services
f Ile
of
g2000il
ry
it
Denton, Tens
lewlsville hydro Plum
Project Scbedala
1998 1968
Moy Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Mov OR Jane fob Mar Apr Nay Jun /J
M„Yi••.~.,.~M,Y~.IM`•M.~••.•FNY'•Y,+•..•',N'YN,',Y,~MY+MNy, M+M,,,M+•MNN 1 W-kthorlte Final Up O••),
Oen•Award 1-6 ase)
3 oeA-BidlAward Sen. Conetr, I
4 my-proj Design "too I
5 SW-701 0109A Coeplete I
d SWIM Reston 0osplets I >•-•)J
7 I0-1001 Spit/hp Ceeplete I
8 Cot-Initial Desg Rev Rio I ,
9 COE-701 Deng Review I
10 CK-701 Spec/on AMIN I
11 COE•1004 Also key oil I
12 cot 100% SpeclDwg Review I
13 FRC•1001 Spac1bg/0C Rev 1
14 FRC•Revim Coffprdaas I ,•.Y.
15 ft18.1Att)61 Consult I
16 FM8-Rev Hatchery Interlace I
17 W,Asylew Bite Layout I
11 118.Outlime his Csglete 1 )Rex)
19 o18•INch Interface Coepl 1 )se■)
20 018-44ip pope Coeplete 1 )88411)
21 M-Flbr Eeeedded Pate I )wo$eggs sa11a11uee1111111111nusoon me"bousesspn)
21 Opt-Mlrlsg Dogs Caeplats I )+8esnsy
23 691-FAr Turbine-Sew 1 )80me"IsIns INseese11auuaseuun11Islas eIllinois)
24 110-Fabr Panels I ysrBonin ussnusn*n*11enn+eggs +nnsnen+8)
25 OCC-1101 tits I
26 KNOW Powrbowee I y,...........N.... NN..y,
27 8CC-!AI'tall T•4 Esbede I Nees) I
2811*14stall 1-8 1
291CC-Instill ElectlPaASle I
I 30 BCC-Unlt Cosplstlon I
, ysss+l
r
G
E
i
F
1
i
ntlLNA
hfR{!
AWgy
~NPi-A11 ~w;d' 9
1
I
[-p lKV
DUPLIC
•IL."
wry of zwNroN ollNroN, rNXAS 76401
MEMORANDUM
I
T0: NILE - LEWISVILI.E HYDROELECTRIC
FROM: R, A. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
dor
DATF: June 31 1987
RE: Telephone Call with Bill Madden, Washington, D.C.
(202) 857.9815
j
-.•--r-.-rr-r•..-rr-.----..---------rwr--r----.r---rr---.-r.r--rr---r-w f
o Throe Possibilities
1 transfer license
2 co-license
3 lesson/lease with Denton owning
o Co-license seems most appropriate.
o Bill Madden to draft agreement clause covering co-license,
reversion back to Denton in future, TMPA ownership/Denton
lease provisions as relating to co-license. To get to
Denton by June 12, 1987,
o Gave Bill telephone number and names of Debra Drayyovitch,
Jim Daily and Elbert M. He will call as appropriate for
Input prior to drafting,
I t
o Tentatively set Tuesday, June 16, 1987, for Bill to come to
Denton or Dallas for meeting with Denton, TMPA and Elbert M.
o Bill advised that co-license request to FERC should be made
160n1987ay take 6 to 8 we ks to get, will discuss on June
r No son, Executive rector
Department of
Utilities
kkn
cc: {
e ra rayovi cc ,M Mt-y- 7 1 t oo'rney
Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
r
4873U:22