HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-18-1988
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
October 18, 1988
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 18, 1988, at 5:30 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City
` Ha':1, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas, at which the following
` items will be considered:
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be considered as part of the Agenda for the
Regular Meeting.
5:30 P.M.
I
1. Receive a presentation regarding the industrial
pretreatment program.
r
2.' Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
1. Discuss and consider retaining counsel to
represent the City in the Flow bankruptcy
litigation.
8. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
1. Consider selection of a site for a new fire
station.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 16, 1988, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City
Hall at which the following items will be considered:
1 E
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of September h, 1988, the special call meeting
of September 13, 1988, the regular meeting of
September 20, 1988.
2. Receive an update from the 191 Committee.
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of
Denton, Texas, providing for the abolishment of the
Lakeview Road Utility District. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
i
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 18, 1988
Page 2
4. Public Hearings
A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of
ordinance approving a planned development and
concept plan on property currently zoned planned
development (PD-126) and agricultural (A).
Applicant is RMB, Inc. The request includes
approximately 867.8 acres of property located
south of U.S. Highway 380 along Trinity Road and
Lake Lewisville and extends approximately 2,400
R feet south of FM 426 (East McKinney Street). The
property is more fully descrited as a part of the
Moreau Forrest Survey, Abstract 417, and the
William D. Durham Survey, Abstract 330. if
approved, the following land uses would be
permitted:
{ Single Family - 10 - 171.0 acres with a
density of 3.2 units per acre
Single Family - 7 - 226.8 acres with a
density of 4.3 units per acre
Single Family Attached - 64.4 acres with a
density of 10 units per acre
Cluster 'comes - 88.1 acres with 9 density of
8 units per acre
i Multi-Family - 59.8 acres with a density of
f 25 units per acre
Office - 18.2 acres 1
I
1 Neighborhood Service - 12.U acres
I
f General Retail - 49.7 acres
Light Industrial - 35,8 acres
Community Facility - 10.9 acres
School/Park - 30.2 acres
Park - 34.3 acres
Right-of-way - 67.5 acres
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.) Z-88.013.
I
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 16, 1986
Page 3
B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance approving a planned development and
concept plan on property currently zoned planned
development . Alic(PD . ant 88 is P-69) and The agricultural
request
includes approximately 414.9 acres of property
located approximately 1,200 feet north of I-35E
and extending to Pecan Creek and more fully shown
` in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and
f the William Durham Survey, Abstract 330. if
approved, the following land uses would be
I permitted:
Single Family - 10 - 93,4 acres with a
density of 3.2 units per acre
Single Family - 7 - 209.4 acres with a
density of 4.3 units per acre
Cluster Homes - 10.6 acres with a density of
a units per acre
multi-Family - 16.0 acres with a density of
25 units per acre
Neighborhood Service - 6.0 acres
Community Facility - 3.0 acres
General Retail - 12.0 acres
School/Park - 10.0 acres
I
Park - 16.0 acres
Right-of-way 36.S acres
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.) Z-1861.
C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an j
ordinance approving an amendment to a detailed
1 plan. Applicant is Hashmet Walt, representing
f Psychiatric Institutes of America. The propperty
is currently zoned planned development (PD-1).
If approved, the Twin Lakes hospital at 2026 West
roomsrsityZ-86018. eXp(Thed Planning ideaanddditional
Commission recommends approval.)
i
I i
I
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 18, 198b
Page 4
D. hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance approving a detailed plan and
establishment of a planned development zoning
district. Applicant is Dale Irwin. The property
is curren.ly zoned planned development (PD-108)
and two-family (2-F) zoning d Strict. The
property is located on the east side of Carroll
Boulevard between Prairie Street and Highland
Street. If approved, the property may be
utilized foi office use. Z-88-010. ('t'he
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
S. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda item 6.A). This listing is provided on the
Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item
prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids and Purchase orders:
1. Bid 09904 - Turn Lane - Colorado Blvd.
2. PR 0104SSS - P 6 P Construction Co. - repair
burned out rent house located at landfi?l.
B. Tax Refunds
1. Consider approval of a tax refund fcr•Earl
Jackson, Jr,
2. Consider approval of a tax refund for Gary
L. Juren.
6. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Uctober 18, 1988
Page 5
award accepting
B, Consider adoption of ordinance
competit've bids and providing for the contracts for public works or improvements,
(Surmount Corporation-Woodrow Lane and Burning
Tree Bridge, Paving and Utilities)
C, Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
establishing speed zones for north and south
'bound traffic on Sherman Drive from its
intersection with Bell Avenue to the north city
i limits. (The Citizens 'traffic Safety Support
Commission recommends approval).
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
west bound
Street for intersection
R traffic establishing on Wispeed lso zones
with Lakey Street to its intersection with
Bradshaw Street; for north and south bound
traffic on Lakey Street from its intersection
with Wilson Street and continuing north for a
total distance of 380 feet; for north and south
bound traffic on Bradshaw Street from its
intersection with Wilson Street to its
intersection with Prairie Street. (The Citizens
Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends
approval).
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
classified positions in the Fire Department of
the City of Denton, Texas; providing for the
number of persons authorized for each classified
position; and repealing all ordinances and
resolutions in conflict herewith.
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing
assignment pay for Fire Department employees in
the classification Driver who are also assigned
to perform the duties of Maintenance/Logistics
Officer,
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing 20.8309 acres being part of the J.
Dickson Survey, Abstract No, 3421, and the A.
Cannon Survey, Abstract No. 232, and located at j
FM 2161 and Old Alton Road, (A-56) (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
t.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 18, 1988
Page 6
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance apFroving the
1968 appraisal rolls as approved by the Appraisal
Review Board of the Denton County Appraisal
District.
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
establishing the anniversary sf ane birth
aldate of
Jr. as City
Martin Luther King,
holiday.
= 7. Consider the appointment of three representatives to
the 2499 Board.
8, Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
A. September Budget Recap
Official Action on Executive Session Items:
9
.
A. Legal Maters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
10, New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
{ suggest items for future agendas.
11. Executive Session:
f A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
4
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(00 Art. 62SZ-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252.17 Y.A.T.S. i
C E R T I F I C A T E
~I
I certify that the ~bcve notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin bo at the City H411 of the City of/Denton,
oT~lock
on the day of 1988 at~
2996C
r
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
October 16, 1966
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 18, 1986, at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City
4 Nall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas, at which the following
items will he considered:
Note: also item
be considered as part of the Agethe ndahe
Regular Meeting.
S:30 P.M.
i 1. Receive a presentation regarding the industrial
pretreatment program.
2. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
1. rDiscuss epresent and consider retaining counsel to
litigation.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252.17
V.A.T.S.
1. Consider selection of a site for a new fire
station.
L
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
i October 18 1988, at 7:00 pm. in the Council Chambers of City
Hall at which the following items will be considered:
7:00 p.m.
i
1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of September 6, 1988, the special call meeting
of September 130 1986, the regular meeting of
September 20, 1988.
i
2. Receive an update from the 191 Committee.
3, Consider adoption of ordinance abolishment Cofy the
Denton, Texas, , providing for
e Planning and
Utility
recommends approval.T)
Commission
Zoning
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 18, 1988
Page 2
e '
4. Public Hearings
A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of
k ordinance approving a planned development and
concept plan on property currently zoned planned
developeent (PD-126) and agricultural (A).
t Applicant is kM80 Inc. The request includes i
j approx,wately 867.8 acres of property located
south of U.S. Highway 380 along Trinity Road and
Lake Lewisville and extends approximately 2,400
feet south of FM 426 (East McKinney .Street). The
property is more fully described as a part of the
Moreau Forrast Survey, Abstract 417, and the
William D, Durham Survey, Abstract 330. If
approved, the followic; land uses would be
s permitted:
Jingle Family - 10 - 171.0 acres with a
density of 3.2 units per acre
Single Family - 7 - 226.8 acres with a
density of 4.3 units per acre
Single Family Attached - 64,4 acres with a
density of 10 units per acre
a
j Cluster Homes - 68.1 acres with a density of
6 units per acre
Multi-Family - 59.8 acres with a density of j
25 units per acre
Office - 18,2 acres I
Neighborhood Service - 12,0 acres
General Retail - 49,7 acres
Light Industrial - 35.8 acres
Community Facility - 10,0 acres
School/Park - 30,2 acres
Park - 34,3 acres
Right-of-way - 67.5 acres
i
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,) Z-88-U13.
I
It
1
City of Denton City Council Agende
October 16, 1988
Page 3
R. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance approving a planned development and
concept plan on property currently zoned planned
development (kD-g8 and PD-69) and agricultural
(A). Applicant is RMB, Inc. The request
includes approximately 414.9 acres of property
located approximately 1,200 feet north of 1-35E
and extending to Pecan Creek and more fully shown
in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330, and
the William Durham Survey, Abstract 330, if
approved, the following land uses would be
permitted:
Single Family - 10 - 93.4 acres with a
density of 3.2 units per acre
a
t Single Family - 7 - 209.4 acres with a
density of 4.3 units per acre
Cluster Homes - 10.6 acres with a 'ensity of
8 units per acre
Multi-Family - 16.0 acres with a density of
25 ui.ts oer acre
Neighborhood Service - 6.0 acres
i
Community Facility - 3.0 acres
i General Retail - 12.0 acres
i
School/Park - 10.0 acres
Park - lb.u acres
Right-of-way - 36.5 acres
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.) Z-1861. 4
C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance approving an amendment to a detailed
lan. Applicant is Hashmet Wali, representing
Psychiatric Institutes of America. The property
is currently zoned planned development (PD-1).
If approved, the Twin Lakes hospital at 2026 West
University may be expanded to provide additional
rooms. Z-88-018. (The Planning and Zoning
j Commission recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 18, 1988
Page 4
D. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance approving a detailed plan and
establishment of a planned development zoning
district. Applicant is Dale Irwin. The property
is currently zoned planned development (PD-108)
and two-family (2-P) zoning district. The
property is located on the east side of Carroll
Boulevard '-tween Prairie Street and Highland
Street. if approved, the property may be
utillzrd fur office use. Z-88-010, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
S. Consent Agenda
Hach of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
Ci: Manager or his designee to implement each Item in
accu,dance with the Staff recommendations,
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda item 6.A). This listing is provided on the
Corsent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item
prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids and Purchase orders:
1. Bid 09904 - Turn Lane - Colorado Blvd.
2. PR 0104553 - P 6 P Construction Co, - repair
burned out rent house located at landfill.
B. Tax Refunds
1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Earl
Jackson, Jr.
2. Consider approval of a tax refund for Gary
L, Juren.
6, Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October lb', 1986
Page 5
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements,
(Sunmount Corporation-Woodrow Lane and Burning
Tree 3ridge, Paving and Utilities)
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
establishing speed zones for north and south
bound traffic on Sherman Drive from its
intersection with Belt Avenue to the north city
limits, (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support
Commission recommends approval),
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
establishing speed zones for east and west bound
traffic on Wilson Street from its intersection
with Lakey Street to its intersection with
Bradshaw Street; for north and south bound
traffic on Lakey Street from its intersection
with Wilson Street and continuing north for a
total distance of 380 feet; for north and s.,,jth
bound traffic on Bradshaw Street from its
with Wilson with Prairie Stre Street. tCitizens
Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends
approval).
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
classified positions in the fire Department of
the City of Denton, Texas; providing for the
number of persons authorized Eor each classified
position; and repealing all ordinances and
resolutions in conflict herewith,
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing
assignment pay for fire Department employees in
the classification Driver who are also assigned
to perform the duties of Maintenance/Logistics
Officer,
G. C
plan onsider adoption of an ordinance and service
Dickson annexing Survey20 Abstract acres No. 3421, and of ththe e A.
Cannon Survey, Abstract No. 232, and located at
FM 21bl and Old Alton Road, (A-56) (The
Planning and 2oninv Commission recommends
approval,)
I
1
f ,
r
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 18, 1988
Page 6
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the
1588 appraisal rolls as approved by the Appraisal
Review Board of the Denton County Appraisal
District.
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and
establishing the anniversary of the birth date of
Martin Luther king, Jr. as an official City
1 holiday.
7. Consider the appointment of three representatives to
the 2499 Board.
8. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
A. September Budget Recap
9. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
10. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
it. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 62;2-)7
V.A.T.S. F
k
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), f
Art 6252.17 V.A.T.S.
C E R T I F I C A T E 4
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1986 at o'clock
i
CITY R
6996C
iI
f
I
i
~1 .I
f
,
i
{
II:
i t f
.1
i
i
MEMORANDUM
TOt MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROMi HOWARD MARTINO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF DENTON
DATEi 10/13/88
I
RE$ INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM I AGENDA ITEM
f
I Howard Martin will present information concerning federal requirements,
status and goals of the Denton Industrial Pretreatment Program.
The Federal Clean Water Act required that all maJor wastewater treatment
facilities develop an industrial pretreatment program. The industrial
pretreatment program is designed to protect wastewater treatment plants
from discharges of toxic materials by industrial users.
The City of Denton received approval for its industrial pretreatment
program March t6, 1984. The program has been implemented and currently,
with the cooperation of our industrial users, we have good control over
discharges of materials that might harm the wastewater treatment plant.
Increasingly stringent federal regulations are requiring the expansion of
program activities to include the universities, hospitals and smaller
industrial users.
1 ~
I
4
C
~ i
f
! t
i
i
i
1.1
I
s
I
i
i
F
V
I i
Sao
CITY OF AENTON
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 61 1988
The Council Conv ned into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m. in the
civil Defense R00u,
PRESENT: Mayor Stephensl
Members AlexanderMOYO
A er Pro Tem Hopkins: Council
, Y , Gorton and McAdams.
ABSENT: Council Member Boyd
l~ The Council received an
Committee, update from the Main Street
Alan Cole, Chairman-Main Street Committee, stated that
would be the Committee s final report before the
process. He this
funding for Cher se ntSira survey on how other cities budget
received
businesses in su
Maieet program and petitions from d
owntown
treet program and the
a Main in Spp Coo dins tor. Min SIncl in his
of Street letter from First State Bank ndicatingeterms for hiring
Packet was t
Project Loan Program. tre
a Main Set
would begin and when Itbwould enasible time line when the work
Cole replied the program could take between 3-5
years depend: r,q
on how the work was done and in what kind of time blocks,
. hen
Col forosharing theirhinformation withathe Counci
of the Committee
cil.
2
The Council considered paving alternatives
Hickory Streets,
for Oak and
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager► stated that first
major project since the landscape/tree this was the
ed, Staff would present preservation ordinance
Oak and Hickory in order to save Asmanyatrees alternatives possible.
paving
was Rick inco rporatSvehla, AePut Pible,
significant y City Manager, stated that there would be a
number of trees affected on Oak Street, The
street would be the ult_.ate section of street.
Provide the most parkin but uld take he 45' ~
would also be the most expensiveoand in alltlikelihood it would
of the width would be necessary. most old not a all
for two lanes of parking and twolane seofltraffic t would allow
less expensive than the 45'
trees, The 37' atr t street but still would ltt kWOJ be
eImany
would be the cheapestto ould have parking on one side onl y
of trees and would build, It would take the least and
umthe
needs for the futuremeQStaffswas4recommendin
g most t l Council the
37' street in relation to disturbing the least number of trees.
'
T --_x-..rsl _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -T
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 6, 1988
Page 2
Council Member Alexander asked what would be the procedure when
an existing wider section of street were made smaller.
Svehla replied that a wider sidewalk would be built or a larger
tree lawn would exist.
Mayor Stephens asked if there would be a possibility of
building bicycle paths in those areas and perhaps asking the
University to provide the material for the paths.
Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins questioned the amount of traffic going
through the area.
Svehla replied that the two lanes of traffic would be adequate
for the present traffic and that the parking could be removed
in the future to make more lanes available if needed.
Council Member McAdams stated that Council Member Boyd had
asked her to state his concerns regarding following the same
guidelines the City was asking developers to follow and a
concern for the preservation of trees in the area. McAdams
voiced the same concerns and stated that this area could not
really be thought of as a traffic artery. An alternative for
east/west traffic was needed with at least two lanes of traffic
and one lane of parking,
Council Member Ayer felt that the 37' width would be adequate
as he used the street many times a day and traffic was
generally not that congested. j
1 I
Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the 37' wide
street.
3. The Council received an update of Appendix A of the
Denton Development Guide.
Harry Persaud, Urban Planner, reviewed the history of the Task
Force. He stated that they had developed a working intensity
map which could be adjusted as cases were considered. He
stated that it would take approximately 8-9 weeks to process
zoning cases after the map was approved. The map would be
presented to the Planning and zoning Commission on September 14
for approval and to the City Council on September 20 for
bppro4al. He stated that a public hearing, approval of the map
and approval of the Denton Development Plan would be presented
to Council at the September 20th meeting.
4. The Council then convened into the Executive Session
to discuss the following items:
i
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 6, 1988
Page 3
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(eArt. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
1. Discussed County Vs. City.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Considered appointment of National League of
Cities voting delegates.
2. Considered appointment of members to the
North Texas Higher Education Authority.
The Council then convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chamber,.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephensr Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins] Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Gorton and McAdams.
ABSENT: Council Member Boyd
1. The Mayor presented the following proclamations:
A. Constitution Week
B. National Voter Week
1
C. Public Power Week
2. Public Hearings
i
A. The Council considered a petition of city of
Denton to establish Agricultural (A) zoning on approximately
115 acres of land. The property was 500 feet wide and began
i approximately 10,910 feet nortb of U.S. Highway 380 near the
Elm Fork of the Trinity River. The property was situated in
the J. West Survey, Abstract 1331. Z-88-011. (The Planning i
and Zoning Commission recommended approval.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition. j
The mayor closed the public hearing.
I
I
r
`I
.~.w.~- - f
City of Denton City council minutes
September 61 1988
Page 4
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this was a petition
of the City of Denton to establish zoning on a tract of land
annexed in the area of Lake Ray Roberts. The Agricultural (A)
zoning, which was the most restrictive, was most appropriate
for this piece of property ana would allow only agricultural or
residential uses.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-138
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 115 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY
10,910 FEET NORTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380 NEAR THE ELM
FORK OF THE TRINITY RIVER, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN: TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGRICULTURAL 'A'
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING
FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 20000.00 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Gorton
'aye,' Ayer 'aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
B. The Council considered a petition of City of
Denton to establish Agricultural (A) zoning on approximately
174 acres of land. The property was 500 feet wide and 10,560
feet long located 350 feet north of U.S. Highway 380 near the
Elm Fork of the Trinity River. The property was situated in ;
the W. Dobbs Survey, Abstract 328, and the J. West survey,
Abstract 1331. L81,012 (The Planning and zoning Commission
recommended approval .
The Mayor opencA the public hearing. f
No one spoke in favor.
i
k No one spoke in opposition.
I The Mayor closed the public hearing.
F Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this was a petition
of the City of Denton to establish zoning on a tract of land
annexed in the area of Lake Ray Roberts. The Agricultural (A)
zoning, which was the most restrictive, was most appropriate
for this piece of property and would allow only agricultural or
residential uses. f
i
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September b, 1988
Page 5
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-139
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
BY ORDINANCE 140. 69-10 AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 174 ACRES OF'LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 350
FEET NORTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380 NEAR THE ELM FORK OF
THE TRINITY RIVER, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREINI TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGRICULTURAL 'A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,'
Gorton "aye,' Ayer "aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered petition of Metroplex
Engineering Corporation requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) to the single family-71000 square foot (SF-7)
classification. The property was 2.074 acres located
j approximately 525 feet west of the intersection of McKinney
j Street and Bellaire Drive. The property was more fully
described in the M. Yoachum Survey, Abstract 1442. If
approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose in the
SF-7 category. 2-88-014 (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval.)
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
R
Bud Hauptman, Metroplex Engineering, spoke in favor. He was
representing the owners of the property. They wanted to
develop the property as SF-7 which would be compatible with the
surrounding zoning. He requested approval of the request.
E
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this property was
located in a low intensity area with the predominate land use
being single family dwellings. The proposed develoL)ment would
be compatible with surrounding land uses. There was a
substantial drainage problem in the area which would have to be
addressed by the developer.
1
r+
I~ ~
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 6, 1988
Page 6
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-140
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 2.074 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY
525 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF MCKINNEY STREET
AND BELLAIRE DRIVE, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO SINGLE-FAMILY
'SF-7' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESYGNATION1
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
t 2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREON AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call Vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye,'
Gorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye," and Mayor Stephens 'aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered a proposed annexation of
135 acres located south of Mills Road, east of Mayhill Road,
and north of McKinney Street adjacent to existing city limits.
(A-55)
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
Kenneth Stout, Rt. 71 Box 432, Dento-ii spoke in opposition. He
stated that he was a property owner in the area and was opposed
to the City annexing his property. He had called several f
people in the area and many of them were in opposition. He
knew of no CIP projects fur the area and felt that the reason
for the annexation was to accommodate the School District. He
had his own water and septic system and used Texas Power and
Light for utilities. He did not want to be annexed into the
` City of Denton.
` Jim Chisem, Route 11, Box 656, spoke in opposition. He was a
property owner in the proposed annexation and was up posed to
the annexation primarily because of the taxing situation. He
objected to imposition: of additional taxes on his property and
the receipt of nothing in return for those taxes.
i
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 6, 1988
Page 7
Herbert McCurley stated that he felt the City was not offering
anything to the residents of the proposed annexation except for
additional taxes. The School District wanted the annexation,
he d1d not. He requested the City delete three pieces of
property from the annexation because he felt the School
District would eventually take over his property and if so, the
School District should pay the price for the annexation. He
asked, 'What could the City offer them?'
Troy Glenn, Route 11, Box 664F, spoke in opposition. He stated
that he would receive no benefits from the City if he were
annexed.
Jimmy Wagner, Route 11, Box 658, spoke in opposition. He
stated that the area residents should not have to pay the price
for the School District to build in the area.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, presented the background
information on the proposed annexation. A request had been
received from the Denton Independent School District for
Z annexation of the proposed new high school site. The City
looked at a larger area for annexation around the proposed
school in order to round off the area for the City limits. The
area had a range of land uses from residential to commercial.
Carson reviewed the City services that would be available to
the annexed area which included fire protection, police
protection, maintenance of public water systems, solid waste
services. Texas Power and Light presently serviced the area
and there were no plans to purchase the electrical power in the
area. An individual would not be required to tie into City
water and sewer as long as his current system was in working
order.
1
Mayor Stephens stated that this was the first public hearing on
the proposed annexation and required no action. The second
public hearing would be September 20, 1988,
3. Consent Agenda
McAdams motion, Gorton second to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
l I
1 A. Bids and Purchase Orders.
f 1. Sid #9886 Bolivar 8' Sanitary Sewer Paving
f and Drainage
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 6, 1988
Page 8
4. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
i:ontracts for public works or improvements.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. dd=141
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING
FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR
IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
McAdams motion, Gorton second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye,' Gorton
"aye," Ayer 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried
~I unanimously.
f B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
granting a franchise to Acme Brick Company for the purpose of
maintaining and operating a natural gas pipeline within the
public right-of-way of the City of Denton, Texas; providing for
a franchise fee; and providing for the regulation of the
construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and use thereof.
(Second Reading)
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-142
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO ACME BRICK
COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING AND OPERATING A
NATURAL GAS PIPELINE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR A FRANCHISE 4
FEE; PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION,
RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND USE THEREOF;
PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR ;
AN EFFECTIVE DATA.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Gorton
'aye,' Aysc 'aye," and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried
1 unanimously.
` C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
r amending Section 1-5 of Chapter 1 of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas establishing the maximum fines for
certain violation of the Code of Ordinances.
i
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 61 1988
Page 9
Mark McDaniel, court Administrator, stated that this ordinance
would lower the fine ceiling for certain traffic and animal
control violations from $500 to $200. The lower fines would be
more in line with State statutes.
The following ordinance was considered;
NO. 88-143
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1-5 OF CHAPTER 1 OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THL CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ESTABLISHING THE MAXIMUM FINES FOR CERTAIN VIOLATION
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
instituting annexation of 20.8309 acres being part of the J.
Dickson Survey, Abstract No. 342, and the A. Cannon Survey,
Abstract No. 232, and located at FM 2181 and old Alton Road.
(A-56)
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DEN'PON, TEXAS= BEING ALL THPT
LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF
APPROXIMATELY 20.8309 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING
SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND
BEING PART OF THE J. DICKSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 342,
AND A. CANNON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 232, DENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A"
DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Gorton second to adopt the ordinance. on roll
vote, McAdams 'aye,' A'exander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye," Gorton
'aye," Ayer "aye," and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion carried
unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving an agreement between the City of. Denton and Dave
Krause providing for communication line serviced and providing
for an effective date. (Public Utility Board recommended
approval.)
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utili'.ies, stated that since
the deregulation of the telephone inddstry, he had received
inquires from businesses about the possibility of installing
their own cables between business facilities for savings with
their own switchboards. The City had a contract with the
University of North Texas to lease space on the City's
I
V
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 6, 1988
Page 10
power poles. The request from Dave Krause would provide
communication lines between two dealerships he owned. The City
would provide the cable and the service to install the cable.
Council Member Gorton expressed a concern if the dealership
were sold and the new owner was not interested in the system,
what would happen to the agreement and the charge-out payments.
Nelson stated that that was a possibility but not likely.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance.
I
Gorton stated that he had concerns about entering into
agreements with no guarantee that the City would receive
payments for the services.
Council held a discussion regarding suggestions for requiring
an escrow account or a deposit to be made with the contract and
how much precedent was being set with this type of contract.
Ayer motion, Gorton second to postpone consideration on the
ordinance until September 2U, 1988 to allow the legal staff
time to investigate some of the alternatives suggested. On
roll vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins "aye,'
Gorton 'aye," Ayer 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion
carried unanimously.
5. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
of the City. Council of the City of Denton designating certain
city officials as being responsible for, acting for, and on
behalf of the City of Denton in dealing with the Texas Parks
and Wildlife Department for the purpose of participating in the
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 19651 certifying that
the City of Denton is eligible to receive assistance under such
a program.
The following resolution wss considereds
RESOLUTION NO. R88-055
i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON
DESIGNATING CERTAIN CITY OFFICIALS AS BEING
RESPONSIBLE FOR, ACTING FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
OF DENTON IN DEALING WITH THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE
DEPARTMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE
LAND AND WATER CONSIDERATION FUND ACT OF 19651
CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF DENTON IS ELIGIBLE TO
RECEIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER SUCH PROGRAMI AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
- - _T .
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 6, 1988
Page 11
McAdams motion, Gorton second to approve the resolution.
l roll vote, On
Gort McAdams 'aye Alexander "aye,• Hopkins "aye,N
rl carried unanimously. ,ayes" and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
B. The council considered a
appointing members to the North Texas a1H gher rEducation
Authority,
The following resolution was considered:
NO. R88-056
l A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE NORTH TEXAS
I HIGHER EDUCATION AUTHORITY: AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Hopkins mo i MCAda 9da:sasecond to approve the resolution, On vot Gorton 'aye," Ayer "ay ; Alexander aye,' Hopkins "aye,"
carried unanimously, ye and Mayor Stephens 'aye.' Motion
6, Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following itemsr
A. July Budget Recap - Harrell stated that the July
budget recap was presented in the agenda.
B. Harrell reported that the August sales tax was
down $18,000 from a year ago,
7. The Council took the following official action:
i
Pro Tem A Hopkins o and motionj
andermi nominate Mayor
delegates to the National League of cities Conference, voting
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander "aye On roll
Hopki *ae,' Gorton
'aye," Ayer 'aye►' and Mayor Stephens aye."ns Motion carried
unanimously.
I
8. New Business I
1 The following items of new business were suggested by Council
Members for future agendas:
A. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins stated she felt there were
several unsettled issues dealing with the budget and questioned
stated thaththe eowould be a orkose sionion September 13aandla
possible session on September 15th.
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 6, 1988
Page 12
9• The Council did not meet in Executive Session
following the Regular Session.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:31 P.m.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
JEN
R L E S
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
2978C
j
I
i
k€
1
i
j
i
f
f!
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 13, 1988
The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m. in the
Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton.
ABSENT: Council Member McAdams
1. The Council held a discussion regarding alternate bids
for the Teasley Lane project.
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, presented three options for
would consist construction on l60
the Lane. Thel consider
day construction period and would close Teasley except for an
9ntrance near the Winn Dixie. The second option would allow
access while construction was proceeding. This option would
take approximately 80 days. The third option was to rebid the
project at a later date so as to not affect the businesses
during the Christmas holidays. Svehla stated that good bids
had been received and if the project were delayed the price
might go up as much as 10-151.
Council Member McAdams joined the meeting.
Staff was suCgesting visits to the businesses to obtain input
from the merchants and present those options at she next
Council meeting.
I 2. The Council held a discussion regarding the proposed
ordinance setting new water rates.
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the
I reason for the increase was the debt service on Ray Roberts
Lake. Without the increase, there would be a negative cash
flow in the future. The current rate was $2.09/1000 gallons of
water and the proposed new rate would be $2.26/1000 gallons of
water. The increase would amount to a 9.751 increase in
residential costs and a 7.181 increat,e in commercial costs.
The overall total increase would be 8.51. I
Dipa Dutia, Financial Analyst, presented the specific changes
in the rate ordinance. She reviewed the rate changes for
residential customers, commercial customers, wholesale
customers, and governmental customers. Dutia presented
comparisons of water rates with other cities.
Rachel Reece, Consultant, reviewed the specifics of the rate
study.
I
City of Denton City council minutes
September 13, 1988
Page 2 Am I
3. The Council received an update on the City health
insurance program.
Tom Klinck, Personnel Director, provided an update on the
City's self-insurance fund and reviewed the history of claims.
Staff was recommending $170,000 be placed in the insurance
fund, an increase in the employee rate for insurance, and minor
plan/coverage changes. He stated that staff was having
discussions with the Denton Independent School District
regarding joint coverage for both sets of employees.
4. The Council did not meet in Executive Session.
The Council convened into a special called meeting at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and McAdams.
ABSENT: None
1. The Council held a public hearing regarding the
proposed 1988-89 City of Denton Program of Services.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the budget process had
begun on July 5 with major budget issues being presented to
Council. A formal proposed budget had been submitted to
Council with formal workshops presented by various
departments. Formal adoption of the budget was scheduled for
September 20, 1988. This budget was the most optimistic he had
presented as the tax rate was constant and had not changed, the
budget would allow for a few new employees and some new issues
plus a salary increase for City employees.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Kennoth Stout stated that the Council needed to take a look at
the increases in the budget and determine how much revenue was
from reappraisals. The City was in need of new growth and not !
only an increase in appraisals. The citizens were at their
limits now for taxes.
Dorothy Damico, Chairman - Human Resources Committee, spoke In
support of the recommendations presented by the Committee, She
stated that several new agencies had been added to the proposed
budget due to increases in unemployment and the lose of a
public hospital, The Committee was requesting emergency
funding to agencies in health care areas.
;I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 130 1988
Page 3
Council Member McAdams asked why the Committee recommended a
cut in funding to the SPAN services when the City did not have
enough transportation services.
Damico replied that the Committee felt transportation services
were not the same as other human resource services and felt
that transportation should find another funding source in the
City budget. The two dollar amounts for SPAN and Handihop
comprised over 400 of the budget.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Following the public hearing the Council convened in a work
session in the Civil Defense Room.
1. The Council held a discussion regarding the proposed
1988-89 City of Denton Program of Services.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that there were several
budget issues that still needed to be resolved. Those issues
included:
ADD DELETE
1. Environmental Health 1. $44,800 excea4 health funds
budget and revenue
2. Legislative Consulting 2. New Human Resources Programs
Streets - Parents Anonymous
Library - Life Planning
SPAN and Handihop - Ann's Hospice
TMRS buy-back - Pre-Natal clinic
- Prior Service
- Military
A discussion followed dealing with the above issues with the
consensus of the Council being: -
1. Fundin would be allocated for the environmental
health budget (87,430) and revenue (4122,037).
2, Funding would be allocated for legislative consulting
030,0001, streets ($10,500), library ($10,500): SPAN ($21000)
and Handihop ($2,000).
i
3. Funding would not be allocated for TMRS buy-back and
due to legal considerations, funding to the proposed new Human
Resource programs would not be allocated.
i
l
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 13, 1988
Page 4
I
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTONt TEXAS
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTONp TEXAS
2985
i
's
i
E
1
i
c.
!
C
h i
i
I
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 20, 1988
The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m. in the
Civil Defense Room.
PRESLNT: Mayor Stephens: Mayor Pro Tem Yopkins: Council
Members Alexar.der, Ayer, Boyd, and Gorton
ABSENT: Council Member McAdams
1. The Council received an update on SPAN, City of
Denton, and University efforts to coordinate public
transportation services.
David Ellison, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that
objectives of the update were to provide an update on current
transportation conditions, seek Council a
with further analysis of the situation, formallyli volveroboth
universities in the discussions and seek approval of the
concept from the Counr^i1. Ellison stated that a
transportation system would (1) shuttle or transport the
general public to and from universities, downtown, major
shopping areas, major employment centers, medical facilities,
and high density housing areas, (2) combine, coordinate, and
better utilize resources devoted to transportation services
currently being provided by different entitios in the community
and (3)
pay for itself with no additional significant financial
outlays or potential for becoming a burden upon taxpayers. The
City would play the role of technical advisor among the groups
involved. j
Council Member McAdams joined the meeting.
Roger Nelson, Administrative Aide, reviewed the
surveys regarding PubliC transportation issues. past citizen
currently the City had onl
y He stated that
transportation - Denton Taxi which rwaarotheeronl of Public
available to the general y provider
provided transportation onlylf for studentsra University iof North
Texas which only provided transportation for studentsi and SPAN
which provided transportation to the elderly and handicapped.
Nelson reviewed the possible funding available to organizations
ircluding Section 18 and Section 9.
Staff recommended the following: (1) SPAN, Texas Woman's
University, University of 0orth Texas and the City of Denton
form a coordinating team comprised of staff members familiar
with existing services provided by each, (2) North Central
Texas Council of Government be used as a technical consultant
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 2D, 1988
Page 2
liaison between the coordinating team and transportation
agencies as well as offering guidance for immediate and long
term planning issues and (3) the coordinating team prepare and
give regular report to leaders of involved organizations and
solicit support form the private sector once more concrete
plans are prepared and accepted.
Roberta Donsbach, SPAN, presented the background of SPAN's
involvement in public transportation.
Fred Pole, University of North Texas and John Erwin, Texas
Woman's University both stated that they were looking forward
to working with all involved entities.
Jerry Cott, representing the Chamber of Commerce, suggested the
possibility of having the Chamber include: on the coordinating
team.
Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the proposed plan.
The Council held a joint work session with the Cable T.V,
Advisory Board at 5:50 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephenst Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and McAdams.
ABSENT: None
CABLE T.V. Chairman Seligmanni Members Fearing, McNeill,
ADVISORY Carstarphen, and Whitten.
BOARD PRESENT
1, The Council and the Cable T.V. Advisory Board held a
discussion retarding the proposal for renewal of a cable
television franchise agreement between the City of Denton and E
Sammons Communications, Inc,
Julia Moore, Administrative Analyst, presented the major terms
of the agreement some of which included; (1) an upgrade of
channel capacity from 36 to 6U channels, (2) an increase in
franchise fee payment from 3% to 5t1 (3) an upgraded system l
which would have two way service capability thrmughout the
entire system, (4) Sammons would pay a maximum of ;35,000 for
refranchisement costs, (5) five access channels would be
provided for designated uses, (6) Sammons would provide 1501000
grant to the City for purchase of equipment to operate a Local
Gmvernment Channel. The Advisory Board was recommending that
Council continue the refranchisement procedure, A public
hearing would be scheduled for October 4, formal approval of
the terms of refranchisement and associated ordinance for
October 18, and adoption of the ordinance and agreement on
November 10 1988.
i
i
City of Denton City council minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 3
I
2. The council convened into the Executive Session to
discuss the following:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
1. Diacuse.ed enforcement of settlement
agreement and security agreement in
connection with County vs. City, et. al.
B, Real Estate Under sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
I~ C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
I
F The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens: Mayor Pro Tom Hopkinsl Council
Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and McAdams.
ABSENT: None
The Mayor presented the following proclamations:
A. Jazzfest Day
B. American Business Woman's Diy
1. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the
regular meetings of August 2 and August 16, 19881 the work
sessions of Auguat 23 and August 27, 1988: and the special
j1 called meeting of August 30, 1988.
Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins noted a typographical error in the
meeting of August 21 1988 and requested a correction.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the minutes as
corrected. Motion carried unanimously.
l t
2, Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing on a proposed k
annexation of 135 acres located south of hills Road, east of
Mayhill Road, and north of McKinney Street adjacent to existing
/ city limits, (A-55)
` The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
City of Denton city council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 4
Herbert McCurley spoke in opposition. He stated that the
School District was interested in purchasing his property and
asked that the Council postpone the annexation until after the
first of January as the real estate transaction might be -
completed by that time and he would not be responsible for City
taxes on property he no longer owned.
Kenneth Stout stated that he had contacted a number of people
on the annexation list and ha3 only one favorable response to
the annexation and that was t)e School District. He requested
a tax abatement until the residents decided they wanted to be
annexed into the City limits. He felt that more residents were
not in attendance of the meeting as there were many elderly
residents in the area who could not get to a night meeting.
Mrs. Billy Baker stated that she was happy with TU electricity
and did not want to become a part of the City of Denton.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, presented background information
regarding ownership and usage of the property in the area. She
reviewed the background information on the school plans for
building. She responded to citizen questions regarding
electric services - residents did not have to connect to City
utilities, The City would provide police/fire protection and
street maintenance. Carson presented an overview of the
annexation process stating that institution of annexation was
scheduled for October 11 with 90 days to complete the process
after that date, November 15 was the earliest date that could
be scheduled for final annexation.
B. The Council considered a petition of Wallace
Duvall requesting historic landmark (H) designation at 118-20 +
North Locust Street, The property was further described in the
William Neill Survey, Abstract No. 971, H-31 (The Historic
Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval.)
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mike Cochran, Chairman - Historic Landmark Commission, stated
1 that it was important to have more buildings on the Square that
f were designated as historical landmarks,
Nancy Hinckley thanked the City of Denton for encouraging
citizens to preserve historical buildings and felt that by
having the building designated a historic landmark one more
step might be taken to preserve the City's history.
City of Denton city council Minutes
September 20, :988
Page 5
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator, presented the history
of the building, The Historic Landmark Commission recommended
approval as did the Planning and Zoning Commission as the
structure met t^e following criteria; (1) the building
displayed characlar, interest, or value as part of the
development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City
of Denton, state of Texas, or the United States, (2) the
building that because of its location had become of value to a
neighborhood, community area, or the City, (3) the building had
value as an aspect of community sentiment or public pride, (4)
the building embodied distinguishing characteristics of an
architectural type or specimen and (5) the building displayed a
relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites, or areas
which were eligible for preservation according to a plan based
on architectural, historic, or cultural motif.
The following ordinance was considered;
NO. 86-144
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, DESIGNATING
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 118-20 NORTH LOCUST STRE9T AS
A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER ARTICLE 28A OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 2,000.00 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PRUVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Hopkins motion, Boyd second to adopt the ordinance. on roll
vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye," Ayer lays," Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
i
C. The Council considered a petition of Dale Irwin
requesting
Subdivision a and Land ofDev Article l4.09 of the
ions City at of CaDenton
rroll
B,-ulevard and Highland Street. This property was further
described as 0,921 acres in the William Loving Survey, Abstract
No. 759. Article 4.09 required the extension of a sewer line
across the full width of the development lot in accordance with
the Master Sewer Plan for the City of Denton. The petitioner
I was requesting a 2ariance from this extension requirement.
I V-46 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.)
J
J
- - - - - -
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 6
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Dale Irwin stated that the request was to not put a -ewer line
in a parking lot. The south end of a proposed project would be
a parking lot as it would not be suitable for a structure and
was thus requesting a variance.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the pubic hearing.
Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator, stated that the
Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended the variance as
it met the follow:ng criteria: (1) granting the request would
riot violate any master plans, (2) the special or peculiar
conditions on which the request was based related to the
topography, shape, or other unique physical features of the
property, which were not generally common to other properties,
and (3) the special or peculiar conditions on which the request
was based did not result from or were not created by the
owner's or any prior owner's action or omission.
Alexander motion, McAdams second to approve the request fot the
reasons cited by the Planning and zoning Commission, on roll
vote, McAdams "aye,` Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Go!ton
'aye,' Ayer "aye,' Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "ayc."
Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered a resolution adopting the
Denton Development Plan (1988) and considered a working
intensity map. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval.)
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Bill Claiborne, Land Use Planning Committee, reviewed the
background of the revisions to the Development Guide which lead
to the Development Plan. He stated that the plan was a long
range development plan. Claiborne reviewed the major features of the Plan and felt that the Plan let Denton remain a unique
City in the north central Texas area.
Sue Smith, League of Women Voters, read a statement in support
of the Denton Development Plan.
M. C. Birch spoke in opposition. He questioned why and how the
small land owners did not consult some of the other people in
the area about the plans rather than try to force it on people.
City of Denton City council minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 7
Kenneth Stout objected to the building of parks in flood prone
areas as everytime the parks flooded, the facilities would have
to be redone. Ilow any cbanqe in zoning
Tom Fang felt that the Plan did oretai1/c mmercia1 development
within the City and that the only o
that could occur would be with large developers. He wanted to
see more freedom tbuild as restricted inhe developer felt was the need
and not have to be zoning.
Claiborne was allowed five minutes for rebuttal. tie state
that the Plan preserved neighborhoods by restricting certain logging and
ricktypeisng of development in certain areas. He stated that the
anyrequipment.
parks tin the flood rails that would areas would
/The following resolution was considered:
RESOLUTION NO. RBB-057
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE D•NTON DEVELOPMENT PT+P.N
MAP; AND PROVIDING FOR AS EFFECTIVE DATE INTENSITY BOUNDARY
how It questioned
affect the ezoning vcasest currently
Council Member
resolution
in progress.
Debra Drayovitchr City Attorney, stated that the resolution
would be effective immediately and was not retroactive to cases
filed on or before September 20, 1988.
The Council then considered the Appendix A interim intensity
boundary map.
wouldabe dev elheopedintenHseity areas
Bill Claiborne stated that draft
would determine how the City
the areas of the map and how the areas would be determined.
No one spoke in opposition to the Appendix A map.
The Mayor closed the public hearing. On
McAdams motion, Alexander motion to depro ay ;"e resolusio'. On
roll vote, McAdams daye" Alexan ■ae ' and Mayor Stephens
Gorton 'aye," Ayer ayeo, Boyd Y +
"aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 8
3. Consent Agenda
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid #9887 - Padmount 'transformers -
Distribution
2. Bid #9888 - Power Transformer - Sub-station
3. Bid #9891 - Printing Parks and Recreation
Brochures for 1989
4. Bid #9873 - Repair Phoenix Apartments Phase
III contract revision/change order - repair
gas leaks.
B. Contracts
1. Maintenance agreement with American
Management Systems - financial software
"LGFS' - $32,250. (The Data Processing
Advisory Board recommended approval).
C. Plats and Replats
1. Considered approval of preliminary plat of
Offenbacker Addition, Lots 2 and 3, Block
1. (The Planning and zoning commission
recommended approval.)
2. Considered approval of preliminary replat of
Township II, Phase 2, Lot 4A, Block A. (The
Planning aid Zoning Commission recommended
approval.)
D. Tax Refund
11 Considered approval of a tax refund for
David J. Ruckman.
4. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or
services.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 9
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-145
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES= PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFORE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Corton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
'aye." Motion carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract
between the City of Denton and Landmark Company for an increase
in the contract price.
The following ordinance was considered:
N0. 88-146
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE
ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
LANDMARK COMPANY FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT
PRICE: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Gortol second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins "aye," Gorton
'aye,' Ayer "ayo Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye.'
Motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance !
approving the expenditure of funds for maintenance services to
the City's contract with American Management Systems.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-147
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON APPROVING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES PURSUANT
TO THE CITY'S CONTRACT WITH AMERICAN MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS= AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Alexander motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins "aye,'
Gorton 'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens
'aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 10
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
altering the prima facie speed limits established for vehicles
under the provisions of Section 169(b) of Article 6701d,
Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, upon portions of Mingo Road,
within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, as set out
in this ordinance; and providing a penalty of a fine not to
exceed $200 for the violation of this ordinance. (The Citizens
Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended approval).
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-148
AN ORDINANCE ALTERING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
ESTABLISHED FOR VEHICLES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 169(b) OF ARTICLE 6701d, VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL
STATUTES, UPON PORTIONS OF MINGO ROAD, WITHIN THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF DENTON, AS SET OUT IN
THIS ORDINANCEI AND PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT
TO EXCEED $200.00 FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated the Citizens Traffic
Safety Support Commission had considered this item at its June
meeting at the request of several citizens.
Hopkins motion, Ayer second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton
"aye,' Ayer "aye,' Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with NPH, Inc.
(d/b/a NPH Architects) for professional architectural services
relating to the design and construction of an addition to the
Denton Senior Center. (The Parks and Recreation Board
recommended approval).
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-149
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT WITH NPH, INC. (d/b/a NPH ARCHITECTS) FOR
PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES RELATING TO THE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO THE DENTON
SENIOR CENTER} AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 11
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that
staff was recommending hiring an architect to begin expansion
on the Senior Center. The architect being recommended was the
architect for the original building and was highly recommended
and qualified for the construction.
Gorton motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander 'aye," Hopkins 'aye,' Gorton
'aye,' Ayer 'aye,' Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye.'
Motion carried unanimously.
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
considering bids and awarding a contract for the construction
of improvements to Teasley Lane.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-150
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE BID AND PROVIDING
FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO TEASLEY
LANE; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mayor Stephens reviewed the options for the construction of
Teasley Lane and the presentation of options to the area
businesses.
Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance.
Council Member Ayer aoked what assurances the City had that the
work would be completed in the time frame stated.
Mayor Stephens stated that the low bidder had a superior
reputation for completing the work done on time. The
contractor had promised to keep close contact with the
sub-contractors. There was only a verbal commitment to
complete the work in a maximum time of 60 days of which the
contractor had stated would take only 45 days. There was a
penalty associated with the ordinance if the work was not done
within 60 days.
On roll vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hopkins "aye,'
Gorton "aye,' Ayer "aye,' Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Stephens
'aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
adopting the budget for the City of Denton, Texas, for the
fiscal year beginning on October 10 1988, and ending on
September 30, 1989.
I
J
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 12
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-151
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF
DENT)N, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON
OCTOBER 1, 1988, AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 301 1989; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the amendments that
the Council had previously made to the budget were outlined in
Appendix A and would be formally incorporated into the document
upon adoption of the ordinance.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander "aye,' Hopkins 'aye,' Gorton
"aye," Ayer 'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens 'aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
levying the ad valorem tax of the City of Denton, Texas, for
the year 1988; providing revenues for payment of current
municipal expenses, and for interest and sinking fund on
outstanding City of Denton bonds; providing for limited
exemptions of certain homesteads; and providing for enforcement
of collections.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-152
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING THE AD VALOREM TAX OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE YEAR 1986, ON ALL TAXABLE
PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY ON
JANUARY 1, 1988, NOT EXEMPT BY LAW; PROVIDING
REVENUES FOR PAYMENT OF CURRENT MUNICIPAL EXPENSES,
AND FOR INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON OUTSTANDING CITY
OF DENTON BONDS; PROVIDING FOR LIMITED EXEMPTIONS OF
f CERTAIN HOMESTEADS; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT OF
COLLECTIONS; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Alexander s_aond to adopt the ordinance. on
roll vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander "aye,' Hopkins "aye,'
Gorton 'aye,' Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
'aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
I
' J
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 13
1. The council considered adoption
Eoofa as verinaicy
adopting new water rate Sc edulEseffectidin date. (The Public
clauses and providing tor an utilities Board recommended approval)
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-153
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING NEW WATER RATE SCHEDULES;
PROVIDING FOR A SEVIRABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Alexander motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordin nce"ayeOn
roll vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander "aye,' Hopkins
Gorton "aye,' Ayer "aye+" Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Stephens
aye.' Motion carried unanimously.
J. The Council considered adoption Denton a d nance
approving an agreement between the City Dav
Krause for communication line services.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-154
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
LINE DENTON AND DAVE KRAUSE PROVIDING FOR
RVICESS AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that
Council had had concerns at a previous meeting regarding a
lon term commitment by the individual regarding a e individualewhich r
A $10000 downpayment had been agreed to by th
would be applied towards the life of the agreement which
reduced the monthly payments. k
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt tFheordinance. pe," On Gorton
aye , roll
vote, McAdams "aye,' Alexander layer"
• Ayer 'aye,' Boyd aye,' and Mayor Ste hens 'aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
R, The CouncTexas,~aestablishing ianfee tonbeccharged
of the City of Dentonr parking lot permit for
for any application for any building or Pa
Article iii of Appendix
;;,ny property to which the provisions of
C of the Code of Ordinances apply.
I
.
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 14 40 1
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 88-155
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
ESTABLISHING A FEE TO BE CHARGED FOR ANY APPLICATION
FOR ANY BUILDING UR PARKING LOT PERMIT FOR ANY
PROPERTY TO WHICH THE PROVISIONS Jf ARTICLE III OF
APPENDIX C OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES APPLY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator, stated that the
ordinance would establish a $30 fee for a landscaping permit.
Boyd motion, Ayer second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote,
McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins 'aye," Gorton 'aye,'
Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
5. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
approving budget adjustments for fiscal year 1987-8B.
The following resolution was considered:
RESOLUTION NO. R88-058
A RESOLUTION APPROVING BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1987-88; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that this
resolution would allow budget adjustments for departments which
were over budget amounts. Most of the overages were due to
unforeseen circumstances. The adjustments did not effect the
bottom line of the budget.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that Fire Operations was
the department with the most overage due to the retirement of
three employees. These employees, according to civil Service
requirements, had to be reimbursed for up to 90 days of unused
sick hours and any unused vacation hours.
McAdams motion, Alexander second to approve the resolution. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye,'
Gorton 'aye,' Ayer `aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 20, 1988
Page 16
S. Council Member McAdams asked for a clarification
on selling in City parks.
C. The Land Use Planning Committee Team Captains had
suggested the possibility of a community group to look at
transportation planning. McAdams asked staff to look at
possibilities for such a group.
9. The Council did not meet in an Executive session
following the regular meeting.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:44 p.m.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
JENN- R
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
2987C
i
f
E
i
J
E
f
' i
I
i
-Ally
JIIpJIIff
IIIIIIIIIJ
Jill
Jill
fill
mill IIIIIijil
II
Ilif)
I
i
i
I
I1
f ~
1D
ciry of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (8f7)660-8307
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
1'0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jack Miller, Chairman, 191 Committee
DATE: 0i.tober 12, 1968
SUBJECT: Semi Annual Report cf the 191 Corrmittoe
We are beginning to see some 'light at the end of the tunnel'
on several projects. The final repaving streets (those on the repaving
in the strall of eet bonde issue.
and Square)
overlayin completed.
projects t that we a bad completes
a
Y g Teasley Lane has been moving along. As you all know, the bid
was awarded, and the contractor moved in very quickly. Most of
the drainage work is complete. B- the time ycu receive this
report, work on the road base should ha.,e been started.
The Bolivar and Magnolia Street bids were awarded in September,
and the project is now underway. The work is beginning on the
north end of the project with the drainage facilities, and the
contractor is moving along well.
The only other project on the Street Bond issue is the Oak and
Hickory projects. We understand that the staff has come back
to you with questions on street width and tree problems. They
will be having further meetings with the Historic Landmark
Commission and P & Z. Finally, they will be seeking final
direction from you so we can be out for bid in the Spring.
1
The last C1P project scheduled for this year is Bonnie Brae.
This project is scheduled to be bid in December. 1he project
will begin at Scripture and end at Windsor as a four-lane
undivided facility.
i
1
OF 04W -Ww~
I
Mayor and Members of the City council
October 12, 1988
Page 2
later. We fe pectato continue sclose too scheduiesonrthose.1989 or
la
The new CIP schedule is continuing Bto move Tree The Woodrow Bridge, and
Lane Bridge, h'ooirow Lane Paving,
Burning Tree Uralnage projects have been bid. It is our
understanding that you have that project on your agenda for
Tuesday night. The project has some in over the original
estimates. We have recommended :o you in the past that
i additional funding from Locust Street be used, and thatr are
additional funds from the South Elm Street project could
also be used. We have discussed this with t staff andtfehelre where
that these excess funds should be uses on projects wohave received
were funding difficulties. Since that time,
the hews about the Highway Department's new ruling on matching
funds. Since there might be some occasion to use some of the
funds on the original portions of film and Locust at some later
time, we think that matching funds from the State could be u this
t just as effectively. 'therefore, we would suggest
i funding be used.
computer. TheUstaffs will abe
All of the Carrcli and haver been tied v to been
continuing to install the software programthatt~ ill actuate
different signal timing schemes. They hope have tat
completed by the middle ofd October, ofhat will hen r is g eetsa
close the resignalizing
has iindicateJ continuing are lookingoatra
The MLK ansion
completira. SteveoBrinkma Center
'
mld-llecember completion date. The architectente cronterxact for
's
project is moving right along.
the center design was also awarded last month.
The athletic field design continues to ~e on tract.. We are
still expecting plans to be complete around the first of the it
s year.
The Taylor Park drainage project is continuing on. the staff
s
had preiected a finish date of ab a tthe is a time now expccting cthe
1
i
has si wed down a little bit, a
the date to be toward end of October.
C
s
Mayor and Members of the City Council
October 12, 1986
Page 3
The rest of the projects on CIP are in the planning or design
stages and include the following:
Animal Control Expansion Out for Bid on Nov. 1, 1968
Mulberry & Carroll Signal Complete by January 1, 1959
Bell Avenue Paving E Drainage Out for Bid on January 1, 1989
"lillow Spring Drainage Ready for bid
Mingo Road Drainage Out for Bid on January 1, 1989
Malone Street Drainage Out for Bid on Dec. 1, 1986
Audra Lane Paving and
Acme Paving f, Davis Out for Bid on Dec. 1, 1988
Mcatnney Signals/Srr,:are
traffic Study (Controllers
Bought) Completed by February 1, 1969
he rest of the CIP plan is scheduled for subsequent years. we
see no real issues or timing problems at this point. We will
continue to monitor those and keep you informed on projects as j
they get closer to our time projections.
i
At our last reporting meeting, Staff advised us that the
Highway Department had ve.bally indicated that matching funds
would no longer be needed. Since that time, the City has
received confirmation of that fact from the Highway Department,
and we have included that letter to you. You may note that it 3
points out that the only Minute Order that the City has m the whirhvsaysrwe must fundwa11 millCommission
As is
Cothe uncil U.S. 77 jewe
made recommendation and you approved funding that with funds
from the Locust Street project that was previously repaved by
the Highway Department, The three highway CIP projects plus
t
he millions dollars worth of funding in the 1955 Street Bond
Issue
funding flevels a for y the totals Individual pproximately
projects are as follows; The
r Loop 286
U.S. 360 south to railroad overpass $1'200,000
U.S. 350 $ 6000000
Locust to Loop 166
U.S. 360 $ 900,000
Locust to Loop 266
(Previous CIP bond issue)
I
E
i
'I
Mayor and Members of the City Council
October l2, 1968
Page 3
U.S. 377 $1,065,000
I-35 to F.M. 1630
F.M. 2181 $3,000,000
I-~5 south for 2 miles 51765,000
think that he funds should used t a sure
of the projects in the Street Bond and the ClPprogram are
completed.
That concludes the report for this meeting. Wo will be happy
to try nd answer any other questions you might have Tuesday
vening.
c er
h irman
4279M
Attachment
E
M
k
j i
j
V
1
r
~I
r
.
• SEP 2 9 !98°
CI v UErov
CiTY MANAGEps r, J
COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENGINEER-DIRECTOR
ROBERT H. OEDMAN, CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION R. E. STOTZER. JR.
AY ST B0,A JR.
R P.C. Box 3067 Dallas, Texas 75221-3067
RAY sroRER JR. September 28, 1988
Mr. Rick Svehla
Deputy City Manager IN REPLY REFER TO
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Svehla:
In reference to your letter to our office dated August 23, 1988
concerning funding requirements and minute orders, we have the
following comments.
The funding of curb and gutter will be payed for by the State
Department of Highways and Public Transportation unless an
existing minute order specifying local participation already
exists for a specific project, This in accordance with the
adoption of the Amended Texas Register Rules on April 30, 1987
by the Texas Highway Commission. The updated policy specifics
can be found in minute order number 85399. We have attached a
copy of this minute order and corresponding exhibits.
We concur that a minute order pertaining to curb and gutter policy
exists for U.S, 77. There are minute orders for I.N. 35 East and
F.M. 2181 that are primarily concerned with surplus property and
are attached for your information, j
It is gepierally advantageous to pursue funding for projects in
addition to the funding required according to State Law as this
mey increase the viability of Frojects with the Texas Highway
Commission.
If you need additional information please contact our office.
Sincerely,
Arnold W. Oliver, P.E.
District /Engineer
d
By'
John V. Blain, Jr., P.E.
District Designing Engineer
Attachment
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
I AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
'ON County MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 1 Pages
District No. DALLAS (18)
WHEREAS, in DENTON COUNTY, it has been requested by the City of
Denton to remove a por ion of arm to Market Road 2181; and
WHEREAS, the removal of this route could allow the city to
proceed with their plans for development of Teasley tame and would
greatly improve safety and traffic capacity in the area.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that FARM TO MARKET ROAD 2181
from U. S. Highway 77 southward along Teasley Lane to nterstate
Highway 35E, a total distance of approximately 0.349 mile be removed
from the State Highway System and be returned to the City of Denton.
I
I
i
f
i
1
Submitted
by Examined and recommended by:
(Titl e Late ranspor tion
Approved eputy Director
Planning Engineer
r c~
( Engineer- irActor
M.nuta Number 87410
Date Passed MAY 16 P?
I
I
1
i
1
1
I
1
i
f
741 41 41 41 41 i141411
~3.
DATES 10/18188
CITY COUN':IL REPORT FOP,l1AT
TO: Mayor and Membets of the City Council
FROM., Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
4 PROVIDING FOR THY ABOLISHMENT OF THE LAKEVIEW ROAD UTILITY DISTRICT
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission included a condition for the
abolishment of the Lakeview load Utility District with their
recommendation of Z-88-013 and 1--1861.
SUMMARY:
i
The Commission determined and the petitioner concurred that the Road
Utility District is no longer necessary to finance the construction
of Lakeview Boulevard.
BACKGROUND:
The State Legislature created the Lakeview Road Utility District
during the 70th Legislative Session. The legislation permitted the
sale of bonds to finance the cc struction of the road.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton, Engineering Department, Owner/Developer, and
Property Owners. {
i
FISCAL IMPACTS
The impact has not been evaluated at this time. The maintenance of
Vakeview Boulevard would have been included in the support of the
Road Utility Dis.rict, and the City will now assume maintenance of
the road as the construction is completed for each phase.
k f ly sub ed:
U 000
I
Prepared bys Llo06 V. Harrell
City Manager
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Ap; -0veds
1 a Robbins
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
2322)
I
i
t
s
1
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frank Robbins, Executive Directoz for Planning
and Development
FRUI: Joe D. Morris, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Lakeview Road Utility District
DATE: October S, 1988
Attached is the proposed ordinance providing for abolishment of
the Lakeview Road Utility District. As stated in our memorandum
-Jthis, of 1988, e ordinance must of adopted the Councilestothbe
two
effective.
0 I
JDM:js
k.
x:: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Managor f
I'
i
Attachment
2508L
i
I
2508L
NO. _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE
ABOLISHMENT OF THE LAKEVIEW ROAD UTILITY DISTRICT; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Lakeview Road Utility District was created by
Senate 402, an Act o: the 70th Legislature, Regular Session,
Chapter 958, Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 6540 (Vernon); and
WHEREAS, the district now lies wholly within the corporate
limits of the City of Denton, and
WHEREAS, Section 27 of Senate Bill 402 provides that the City
may abolish the District in the manner authorized by law; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the City Council finds that the Lakeview
Poad""Uti ty District, as created and described by Senate Bill
402 of the Act of the 10th Legislature, Regular Session, (Chapter
958, Tex. Seas. Law Serv. 6540), is nc• longer needed and that the
abolition of the District would be in the best interest of the
residents and property in the City of Denton and the District.
SECTION II. That based upon the findings herein made, the
Distr ct s a be and is hereby abolished.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988.
G
MM-STURM MAYOR
i
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: 1
I
Pp_ !+i nutes
July :7. 1188
Pape 9 t~
1 Mr. Holt asked what type of regal assurance tha City has
about not using the RUE to finance the road. Mr. Morris
stated that the state law autnorireS the City to dissolve
the district. he stated the Lity council can dissolve the
district at any time by adoption of an ordinance. He
continued that under statelaw, the district may have been
dissolved upei annexation of all the land identified in _
the RUD but it the Council wanted to dissolve the RUD, an
ordinance should be adopted to clarify the situation.
Mr. Holt asked if the city could stipulate that a kUD
could not be used without approval from the City.
Mr. Morris stated that the City has to approve the
construction plans prior to use of the RUL.
Ms. Broc'. asked if an additional condition could be added
to state that a RUD would not be allowed. Mr. %lorris
stated that a recommendation would have to be made to the
City Council.
Mr. EngeIbrecht asked how long It would take before it
would go into effect. Mr. Morris stated that as soon as
the City Council passed it.
Mr, Engelbrecht asked what options could the property
owners for the triangular property have. Me. Carson
stated that the moderate node boundaries could be
redefined to Include the piece of property.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Bascom stated that the developers were
'w1IIInj to agree to & condition to the planned develop-
ment that the RUD would not be used.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECI SIONt Mr. Holt asked if the phasing would involve
wonrula6 beirequired whichnincludesythetsubmittalaofea land-
scaping plan.
Mr. Holt :tared that he had two major problems with the
development, 1) the Road Utility istrict and 2) the
moderate node. He believed that the moderate node could
be dealt with later and the AUD should be dissolved.
Mr. Flop sowed to recommend approval of 2.81.015 with
RoadiUtlober six tilitymDistrict being sbesusedtfor t the tconstruction
of a road. Seconded by Ms. Morgan.
Ms. Brock stated that she was not in (aver of the devel•
opmettt because of the moderate node.
Ms. Brock moved to make an amendment by adding a condition
that all electric service shall be purchased from the City
of Denton. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock,
Mr. Morris stated the developers would have to agree to
the condition. Mr. Basca■ said the petitioner had no
W actions.
Mr. Morris stated the property would be sold to
individuals and it would not to possible to require them
to purchase electric from the city.
Chair called for a vote on the amendment and It carried
Uanimously (1•U).
I
I
P 6 2 Minutes
September 11, 1988
Page 5
3. Thetdeveloper will be responsible for elevating Tract
3 o a level above the 100-year floodplain as deter-
1mined by the City of Denton, so that a buildable site
will be available prior to construction of any facili-
ties on the property. pp
ina construction a
accord6ncewiththe improvements tphasing schedule. No
building permits shall be issued for the next phase of
i•velopment until the bridge structure linking the
phases has been completed, yy
9, bLeanidnuases
sectionseofshaIl
Appendix A, Zoning Ordinance, of the Code of Ordi-
nances. The following specific restrictions are
Imposed:
General Retail: Article 7 Subsections G and H.
ce: ro esslonal and Administrative offices.
L Orhood Service; Article 7, SuSsectlon H.
' ommun t ae t Land uses shall be approved with
t e e a e an for those tracts. Community face -
lty uses may Include;
Art Gallery or Museum
Cemetery
Church or Rectory
College or University
Public School
Private School
Community Center
Day Nursery, Day Care or Kindergarten
Hospital
Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature
Library
Nursin Home or Residence Home For Aged
P
ark, Riayground or Public Community Center
Firm
Pub11ct8uildlAS ofmLoulyuState Sore FederaldCovernment
Other similar uses approved on detailed rIon.
6. The construction of the roads shalt not be financed
by bonds sold in accordance with provisions 4 a Road
Utility District.
7. Electric Utility service shall be provided by the city
of Denton.
Ms. !rock asked how widening Evl,her will affect the
buffer cones.
Ms. Carson stated that the setbacks will be from the edge
of the pavement.
Mr. Clark stated that the buffer will be done after the
road is widsned. The lssue is with the curb and =utter.
the5curb andaSutter. ItrSwisherhRoadtIsito betancol-
lector, culvert pipes could be installed Instead of
curb and Sutter, but t,tey are more difficult to maintain.
Mr. Clark stated that If Swisher becomes a collector
street, he recommends Installation of curb and Sutter.
If it is to be a cul-de-sac, then it should be quitclaimed
to the City of Shady Shores for their maintenance. He
said that if there will not be Denton traffic on the road
it should be quitclaimed.
Ms. Carson stated that the majority of the road belongs
agreed upon ETJDlinenwithhthenCitytofn Shadyo Sharestand
end confusion about who is responsible for ■ainttnance.
I
i
4
P 6 2 Minutes
September 14, 19AS
Page 6
dr. Holt asked if a need for Swisher is foreseen.
Mr. Clark stated that Lakeview Boulevard will be of
adequate sire to handle traffic In the area. If Swisher
is developed It will encourage cut-through traffic to
avoid the traffic lights.
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that if the 90 degree inte.rsection
with Pockrus is eliminated. Swisher will not serve Denton.
Mr, Clark stated that the traffic study did rr.• include
the routing of traffic onto Swisher; hc%.everI the way tae
plan is proposed standard requirements for ruving and curb
and Butter would have to be met.
Mr. Bascom stated that it was agreed with the horeowners
that there would be no ingress/egress ato-g Tract 10 onto
Swisher. The plan is to funnel traffic to Lakeview
Boulevard. This will provide net hbornood security, no
impruveaents will to required, in~ the nelgM1borhood will
remain as it is. The County is proposing to repave
Swisher, but the Southvlew development will not impact
Swisher.
Mr. Clark stated that the Subdivision Regulations require
pavement of roads that abut property being de~elopsd.
Mr. Bascom stated that he was under the lapressior that
Swisher would not have to he upgraded bear use the devel-
opment will not impact it. This understanding came from
the traffic study.
Mr. Clark stated that traffic study does not include
collector or peripheral streets.
Mr. Bascom stated that the issue can be addressed at
a later stage.
Ms. Brock asked if the issue needed to be addressed along
with the PD since It is an automatic requitement of the
Subdivision Regulatlons.
Mr. Morrie stated that it should be addressed during the
platting stage or could be waived with the detailed plan.
Ms. Carson stated that there is not enough information at
this time. It con be looked at in the detailed plan stage.
The detailed plan will need to go to City Council and con-
ditiuns may be imposed to the detailed plan.
Ms. Brock stated that she had recommended for the Lakeview
rowing request that City of Denton electric service be
required, but she understood that there may be a problem
with the condition.
Mr. Morris stated that he recommends that the condition
requiring electric service to be purchased from the City
of Denton be excluded from the formal recommendation to
City Council. Electric service Is governed by Stare law
and the Council will have to be informed that the condi-
tion cannot be imposed should it be forwarded to them.
Mr. Engelhrecht asked how the berms and landscaping will
be maintained in the future and haw the City will Insure
the maintenance.
Ms. Carson stated that the Landscape Ordinance requires
the owner to provide and maintain landscaping. In this
situation, staff recommends that a homeowners' assoociition
be created to cart areahbe bmader &ware ofdthel reeuirement.
lrg property 4
f
R
P 6 2 Minutes
September la, 1988
Page 7
!tM
She said that in the past, the City has had problems with
eomeowners' associations. That is why staff is suggesting
this as a condition of the FD. it will be clear that
maintenance Is not the City's responsibility. The amount
of maintenance required will be considered when the land.
scape plan is submitted for review.
Mr. Morris stated that the Legal Department will draft a
provision in the ordinance at the detailed plan stage that
will require notice of the homeowners' association to any-
one purchasing a lot. The requirement can be enforced in
the platting stage.
Ms. Carson stated that in Township It the homeowners were
responsible for maintaining the landscaping. It is now
done by the City at the homeowners' request.
Chair closed the public hearing.
DECISION: Mr. %amean stated that the developers appear
to have complied with what the homeowners requested. He
moved to recommend approval of 2-LB61 with the deletion
of condition eT about electric service and the addition
of a condition requiring a homeowners' association to be
cleated to maintain landsca pping and that those purchasing
property in the area be notlfied of the condition.
L_Seconded by Mr. Holt and unanimously carried (6.0).
B. 2.88.010. Consider making a recommendation on the petition
o Dale Irwin requesting approval of a detailed plan and
establishment of a planned development sor district.
The property is currently toned planned development (PD-108)
and two-family (24) coning district. The property is loca-
ted on the east side of Carroll Boulevard between Prairie
Street and Highland Street, if approved, the property may
be utilized for office use.
Fourteen notices were mailed to property owners within
200 feetl four were received in favor, two In opposition,
and one in opposition that was not on the mailing list.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the request is for
appro" o val of~a detailed plan and to establish a PD on the
property currently zoned PD•101 and two•tamily, The re-
quest would allow office use. The property is surrounded
on the north by office and residential use, on the south
by a day care center and residential, on the east by resi-
dential, and on the west by MF•10 a PD for office, and
neig1hborhood service. The property fronts on Carroll
Boulevard, but no curb cuts are proposed on Carroll. Access
will be on Highland and Prairie. The property is located
in a high intensity area. This was created to encourage
business downtown. The Development Guide does not set
intensity numbers for high intensity areas. Instead, deci-
sions must be based upon Infrastructure and Impact on the
neighborhood. Ms. Carson continued that the Guide estab-
lishes criteria to be revlewed. She said the PD as proposed
meets these criteria. No detached 11 ns are included in the
proposal, Four buildings ate proposes. The site plan for
the existing PD has been altered to protect an existing tree
and allow stacking room.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked how the Commission could consider
protection of the neighborhood It it is in a high Intensity
area.
Ms. Carson said that the Carroll Boulevard policy and the
Guide specifically state that neighborhoods are to be
protected. Office uses generally produce SSO vehicle trips
per sqqusre area. The developer expects a lower number that
shouldn't affect Msit Prairie and Highland too ouch.
I
rTTI=
MCI=
i
I
I
#A1 , W.
a
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDfNG / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPNONf (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
DATEt October 10, 1988
TOI Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Frank H. Robbins, Executive Director for Planning
and Development
SUBJECTS Zoning Decision Making and Lakeview and Southview
BACKGROUND
At the Council work session of October 4, 19880 in our discussion of RMB's
tracts, the Mayor asked about how and to what degree the Guide's density
standard (4.7 dwelling units per acre) is used by the Commission and particu-
larly staff in making a zoning case recommendation. Cecile and your responses
were correct, as far an they went.
i
ADOPTED DECISION MAKING PROCESS AND STANDARDS
The decision making standards and process are spelled out in the 1987
Resolution, attachment 1. The decision making process uses INTENSITY (trips
per acre), not DENSITY (units per acre). While there is a density standard in
the Guide, it is not part of the adopted decision making process. The j
"overalh`, 4.7 units/acre standard is a standard that applies to all the low
intensity area in the Guide, not a specific study area. There is no adopted
mechanism to use the 4.7 unit/acre standard. We have not used, at least since
we adopted the attached resolttion, this standard as part of a coning case
deliberation.
There is also a conflict in the policy standard statement in the Guide
(attachment 2)1 4.7 units per acre is 47 trips per acre for single family at
10 trips per unitl 75 trips p:r acre is not 4.7 but 7.5 units per acre. Given
the nature of the city-wide 1.7 standard and the conflict, we have not recom-
mended nor use the 4.7 acre standard as a basla for decision making. We use
the intensity standard as the first and most important part of the decision
making model.
I`
f
Lloyd Harrell
October 10, 1988
Page 2
We will provide Council on the chart that we prepared for the worksession the
different intensities of the various RMB proposals.
BASIS FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommendation is based on a number of related standards and
policies in the Guide, previous decisions, comprehensive planning imple-
mentation principles, to some degree how the development's neighbors feel
about the project and how effectively RMB's neighbors will be able to
influence the ultimate development of the area near them, and to a lesser
degree still, the nature and skill of the RMB team as they relate to
effectively planning and appropriately developing their land.
1. Standards and policies.
With respect to reviewing all relevant policies, the Guide states the
following in its introduction to "Land Use Intensity Policies!"
Special Notes It should also be understood there are
numerous other policies and factors that
will be considered in City planning decision
making.
Our detailed analysis of how well the proposal meets the intensity (trips
per acre), concentration (area of multi-family and nonresidential land uses),
separation (distances between multi-family and non-residential land uses,
diversity (mixing of different land uses), and protection of existing and
future neighborhoods and homes is provided in a number of different formats
in the zoning case staff report. In summary, in reviewing all the relevant
policies and intensity standards we concluded that the RMB proposals met the
Guide's criteria for approval of a zoning case and that the recommendation was
consistent with previous decisions made by Planning and Zoning Commission and
the City Council. j
2. Comprehensive planning Implementation.
Planning and developing the community works much easier and better for the
public to be able to deal with one entity with a large amount of land than
with numerous entities with small tracts, orderly development is much easier
to achieve. Land use approvals and the land's infrastructure (roads, parks,
and utilities) provision in accordance with the community's master plans are
much easier to affect when dealing with larger tracts. We are probably
acquiring more developer built or dedicated park, road, and school public
improvements with RMB'e large tract than if we had many small developers, with
small tracts dealing with us at different times. The larger the tract, the
more capable a developer is of providing public improvements. It is easier
for us to negotiate these improvements which are in excess of our adopted
development standards.
h
1
I
ti
I
Lloyd Harrell
October 10, 1988
Page 3
Because RMB's tract is a PD, we are able to approve Detail Plans for a large
tract. These Plans will show land, buildings, and their improvements, planned
and zoned in great detail. We have asked or will ask this developer to show
I us more than we have ever asked any previous developer.
recently made a zoning requested at
example As an neighborings alltlandBowner, vs, large
That
with me and RMB to jointly plan land uses and road systems at one time.
request has not borne fruit, for any number of good reasons. We do not have
to request a large tract owner to comprehensively plan it, he must do it in
order for our approval to be given.
30 Neighbor participation.
For the same reasons it is easier and more efficient for the public to deal
with large acreage at the same time, it is easier for the tracts' neighbors to
proposed tdenear them. velopment. PD'a provide for neighbors a
influeance
current RMB team ppearsmtoe detailetod
the
look
have been appropriately accommodating to the concerns of all its neighbors.
RMB's neighbors have suggested to the P32 that this development should be
approved. This effective participation should continue and be encouraged as
we review PM's Detail Plans.
4. Nature and skill of the developer.
Certainly, the Bass group has the financial capability to develop this tract,
and
teamihas been relativelyeeasy eforgthetstaff toswork vwith. They haver strong B
engineering and planning firma. The RMB team is able to very knowledgably
work with us on all relevant issues, from dissolving the RUD, to urban runoff
attenuation, to park development, to roadway impacting and design, and to
beable lieve to
landscape toour buffering questions nand requests. We are
they careucredi
accurately ble.
Accordingly, we have recommended approval of Lakeview and Southview.
~ Arank 4H.bbi2nL8oAILCP
db
Attachment
1549x
I
I
w
I ~
1635L `
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION N0./
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT GUIDE 1985 ,D TO
AMENDED, BY ADOPTING A GENERAL
LAND USE DECISIONS, THAT PROVIDES FOR THE ALLOCATION OF VEHICULAR _
TRIP GENERATION INTENSITIES FOR PLANNING AREAS; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Denton Develo ment Guide 198E0 at. amended, was
I adopted as the o c a compre ens ve p inn ng guide for the
City to be used in making decisions in planning, development and
land use; and
WHEREAS, theaGuide nnindiaes toe InCity sureinthehgoal of balanced
low intensity planning areas
growth; and
WHEREAS, the guide fails to provide a specific policy for
the allocation of trip generation intensity within the
respective planning areas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, upon the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission, has determined that a policy
providing for the allocation of trip generation intensity within
the resppective planning areas established by the Guide would be
useful in the planning process; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTIOTN I.
That the Development Policies of section III, E. 40 b, of the
Denton Develo meat Guide 1995, as amended, be further amended
to read as follows I
j
b. Land Use Irtation Balance
1) General Policy and Standards 4
(a) To promote the goal of balanced growth between
land use and transportation systems, the City is
divided into high, moderate, and "low intensity
planning areas. (See map on page 23) For plan-
ning purposes, the moderate and low intensity
planning areas have maximum trip generation
standards. A moderate intensity area can have a
Page 1-1 l
maximum of 2s0 vehicular trips per day, per gross
acre. A low intensity area ~an have a ss ac maximum of 7S
vehicular trips per day, pe 8to
intensity area has no established limit.
(b) As a general planning policy, a specific development
should only make use of a proportionate share of the
trip generation intensity allocated for the intensity
planning area affected, based upon the ratio of the
acreage of the proposed development to the acreage
contained within the intensity planning area in which
the development is located.
Therefore, to apply the general policy in making a zoning
decision that affects acalow or nsidermoderate intensity planning area,
would the following i) What is the tripp generation standard for the
planning area? (e.g. If the area is 640 acres
be 75 intensity area, x 640hac. the maximum
48,000
wois a uld low
and trips it
T.P.D.)
ii) How much trip generation intensity has already
been used by existing development and zoning in
` the planning area?
fj iii) to w the muctrip h generation intensity is allocated general
policy? (e.g. a 160 acre specific development
in a 640 acre low intensity planning area iwould
be allocated 12,000 trips per day, which of the allotment for the entire area). I
iv) How much trip generation intensity is to be used j
by the proposed development?
k v) How the much pltrip anningeneration if intensity the proposed zoning
request is granted?
l
If the proposed devel opment does not violate the general policy
would be evaluated in
intensity other o policies it of the request Cuide,
reference to
(c) specific allocation violates a determination policy of
ro hen
b pormade whether there are plaof a nning dispconsiderations
e
that would warrant approval
f allocation of trip generation Intensity. 'those
Page 1-2
I
considerations may include, but are not limited to,
the following:
I) the location of the proposed development in
reference to existing or proposed public
facilities, such as streets, water or sewer
lines, and drainage facilities. In this regard,
the City's Master Plan for public facilities
should bm considered. it may be found to be
more desirable, for example, to allocate more
trip generation intensity to a proposed develop-
ment that is adjacent to, or would have con-
venient access to, existing or proposed major
thoroughfares, major water and sewer lines and
drainage facilities,
ii) The topography of the land in the planning area
and the proposed development. There may be
reason to allocate less trip generation
intensity for a specific property that would
otherwise require major modification of natural
and large other masses major
rrelevelithe n removal o
trees, , the 6 of hills
topographical modifications to develop.
iii) The land use in the planning area and surround-
ing areas. The proposal should be reviewed to
i determine the compatibility with existing and
potential land uses in the area and surrounding
area,
iv) The allocation of trip generation intensity in
reference to other policies of the Guide, such
as the protection of older neighbocfioos and
single family housing; diversity of housing, and
of apartments and
the concentration
office/retail sites.
d) In specific areas where a disproportionate allocation
I of intensity has been granted, the propossedtlde velop:
ante least
roent will be evaluated in re er
intense, most logical land use for property in the
area, In addition, the effect on the surrounding
planning areas and compatibility with other policies
of the Guide should be reviewed.
SECTION I1_:
That thi% resolution shall become effective immediately upon
its passage ind approval,
Page l-3
i
t
PASSED AND APPROVED this the, day of , 1987.
RAT 5 K-----
CITY 0 D£NTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
~OXO+bA
ACTI CIT SECRETARY
CITY F DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
i
i
9Y: j
{
33
,
{
i
i
I
Page 1-4
i
1
. Attachment 2
R Discouraging unsightly and hazardous strip commercial by
requiring sign restrictions, buffering by greenbelts and/or
landscaping in site plans
D. Low Intensity Areas
1. Purpose and Intent
All areas not designated high or moderate intensity areas are
considered low intensity areas. The primary purpose of these
areas to to insure the overall area land use transportation
balance by controlling the overall density and intensity (75
tripe per day per gross acre). Further, theme areas represent
our primary housing areas. Thus, these areas should emphasize
• residential use whereas the other intensity areas might emphasize
commercial or employment areas.
2, Location
The general location of these areas Is shown on the map located
at the end of Section A (page 25).
I
3. Size/Intensity
i
These areas are planned to correspond to an overall gross density
policy of 4,7 units/acre and overall intensity policy measured at
75 trips per day per gross sere.
4. Diversity/Neighborhood Protection
Dive►sified land ties, low density residential, small scattered
• sites of apartments (Sees than 200 unite), neighborhood service,
16821 Page 2-1
1
T
i
3
-2 -1 JL LA -1 1
i
1
I
DATE: 10/18/88
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harroll, City Manager
SUBJECTr PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR THE PETITION OF RMD,
INC. REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND CONCEPT PLAN
ON PROPERTY CURRENTLY ZONED PLANNED DRYELOPMENT (PD-126) AND
AGRICULTURAL (A). THE REQUEST INCLUD99 APPROXIMATELY 867.8 ACRES OF
PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF U. S. HIGHWAY 380 ALONG TRINITY RO/D AND
LAKE LEWISVILLE AND EXTENDS APPROXIMATELY 2,400 FEET SOUTH OF FM 426
y (BAST MCKINNEY STREET) (Z-88-013)
t
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-88-013
at Its July 27, 1988 meeting by a vote of 4 to 3.
I
SUMMARYi
The request was analyzed using the Denton Development Guide. The
attachments include a description of the policies end how the
proposal relates to the policies.
{ B CKG OUND:
A detailed statement of history of area since 1984 is attached.
PROGRAMS. DRPARTMBKIS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
i
Property owner, adjacent property owner and City of Denton
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact has been determined at this time.
i
Res fully pubm t d:
Prepared by: Llo(d V. Harrell
City (tanager
Cecile Carson
1 Urban Planner
r App yyoved: -
fie
Frank H. Robbins
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
08590
:
I
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-88-013 Meeting Date: October 18, 1988
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: RMB Realty, Inc.
First City Sank Tower
201 Main Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Status of Applicant: Land Owner
Requested Action: Approval of a planned devel-
opment and concept plan on
property currently zoned
Planned Development-126 and
Agricultural. The following
land uses would be permitted:
Single Family - 10
- 171.0 acres with a density
of 3.2 units per acre
Single Family - 7
226.8 acres with a density
of 4.3 units per acre
single Family Attached j
- 64.4 acres with a density }
of 10.0 units per acre
Cluster Iimmes
- 88.1 acres with a density
of 8 units per acre
multi-Family
- 59.6 acres with a density
of 25 units per acre
Office
18.2 acres
Neighborhood Service
- 12.0 acres
General Retail
49.7 acres
Light Industrial
35.8 acres
Community Facility
- 10.0 acres
School/Park
- 30.2 acres
Park
- 34.3 acres
Right-of-way
67.5 acres
I
mow-
4
t
Z-88-013
Page 2
4 GENERAL INFORMATION (continued)
Location and Size: The request includes approxi-
mately 667.8 acres of property
located south of U.S. Highway
380 along Trinity Road and Lake
Lewisville and extends approxi-
mately 2,400 feet south of
I FM 426 (East McKinney Street).
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Agricultural, Extra-
territorial Jurisdiction
(ETJ), U.S. Highway 380,
Residential, and Scattered
Businesses
South - Agricultural, Pecan Creek,
and proposed planned devel-
opment (Z-1861)
East - Agricultural, Lake
Lewisville, ETJ, and
Vacation Village Mobile
Home Park
West - Agricultural, Residential,
and ETJ
Denton Development Guide: Low Intensity Area, Moderate
Intensity Area at U.S. Highway 380
and proposed Lakeview Boulevard,
and Moderate Intensity Area at
McKinney Street and proposed
Lakeview Boulevard.
~ l
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: A traffic study was prepared by
DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc. Based
on the results of the traffic study,
conditions have been ati.ached to the
recommendation concerning improve-
ments to roads. The prcperty has
frontage on U.S. Highway 380,
Trinity Road, Mills Road, Blagg
Road, and McKinney Street (FM 426).
The development also proposes the
construction of an arterial from
U.S. Highway 380 to IH 35. The
arterial will be completed in
phases. Other interior roads will
be approved with the detailed plan
and preliminary plat and final plat
of each phase.
i
t ~
Z-88-013
Page 3
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Utilities: A preliminary utility plan for water
and wastewater has been submitted
which shows major distribution _
lines. Utility line sizing and
location will be approved with the
detailed plan and preliminary plat
and final plat of each phase of
development. City participation
in oversizing of water and waste-
water lines is not anticipated.
The property is located in a dual
electric service area with the
City of Denton and Texas Utilities.
Other utilities will be available
as the property develops.
Drainage: Drainage will be a major concern
addressed at the detailed plan and
preliminary plat stage. Some of
the property is designated as flood-
plain and floodway. In addition
some of the property fronts on
Corps of Engineer property and Lake
Lewisville.
HISTORY
The City of Denton annexed the majority of the
y property on i
October 17, 1985 and additional acreage was annexed in 1986
and 1987, j
i
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of planned i
development zoning on 703.37 acres of land included in this request f
on December 4, 1985. The City Council held a public hearing on
January 71 1986 and recommended that legal documents be prepared
to zone the property planned development at its February 41 1986
meeting. Following lengthy discussions between staff and peti-
tioner concerning the wording of the conditions, the City Council
adopted an ordinance on January 6, 1987 zoning the 703.37 acres
Planned Development-126,
i
The Lakeview Road Utility District, Senate Fill 402, was passed
by the Texas Legislature during the 1987 Regular Session. The
District was created in order to finance the construction and
maintenance of the road facilities in the District through the
issuance of bonds and taxes collected. The road facilities must
comply with all applicable regulations and be approved by the City
of Denton prior to construction.
Z-88-013
Page 4
HISTORY (Continued)
r The Commission considered an amendment and expansion of PD-126 at
its June 8, 1988 meeting and recommended denial of the request.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Intensity:
The property is located in both low and moderate intensity areas.
Planned Development-126 is approximately 1088 over the intensity
standard based on standard 30 acre moderate nodes at Mills Road
and Lakeview Boulevard and McKinney Street and Lakeview Boulevard
and low intensity on the remaining property. PD-126 is 40% over
the intensity standard based on expanded moderate nodes of 80.84
acres at McKinney Street and 160.88 acres at Mills Road.
The proposed concept plan, based on Development Guide intensity
standards, would be 5% under the total available intensity
standard. This calculation is based on moderate nodes of 116.6
acres at U.S. Highway 380 and 98.5 acres at McKinney Street and
low intensity on the remaining 600.2 acres excluding right-of-way.
The moderate area at U.S. Highway 380 is 9% over the available
intensity standard (includes intensity for 15 acres of property
north of U.S. Highway 380 designated as moderate intensity area
by the Guide but no part of this zoning request). The moderate
intensity area at McKinney Street allocates all the available
intensity in the moderate node (includes property at all four
corners of the intensity area). The low intensity area is 168
under the intensity standard for a lc,w intensity area.
i
The concept plan indicates a request for less than a proportionate
share of intensity. This conclusion is based on the following
intensity: (1) low intensity area is 7,305.6 intensity trips
below the proportionate sharer (2) moderate area at U.S. Highway
380 is 6,394 intensity trips above the proportionate share; and
(3) moderate area at McKinney Street is 113 above the propor-
tionate share. Therefore, the overall proposal is 798.6 trips
or 18 below the proportionate share of intensity available for the
867.8 acres.
Moderate Intensity Areas:
According to the Development Guide, moderate intensity areas
should be 30 acres to 250 acres with an intensity standard of
250 trips per day per gross acre. The Guide also states that
the larger centers should include a diversity of land uses.
The moderate area at U.S. Highway 380 includes approximately
116.6 acres. Tracts It 2, 41 50 61 71 8 and 9 shown on the
concept plan are included, as well as 15 acres north of U.S.
Highway 380. The 101.6 acres proposed in Lakeview includes
N
I
Z-88-013
Page 5
STAFF ANALYSIS (Continued)
general retail, multi-family, light industrial, office and a
` community facility site. The diversity analysis encourages
housing near jobs. The infrastructure proposed for the area
would adequately serve the land use in the moderate intensity
area. It is possible that the area to the north would be expanded
above the 15 acre minimum allocation. The triangular shapeditract
includedninytheamoderatehnode. Realty,
between ropertyrmay aHighway 380,
p
Overall, the concept plan EorHothe 86 wever8 requests aa intensity
tionate share of intensity.
area at U.S. Highway 3801 the developer has requested
While thei
tional trips than currently allowed by the standard.
intensity area has not been expanded north of U.S. Highway 380,
it is logical that additional acreage will extend the area toward
Collins Road.
The proposal requests more intensity than the standard allows.
A review of the criteria to approve a disproportionate share of
a guide for con-
intensity
moderate intensity area:
sideration i of outlined
s. The location of the to ose3 develo ment in reference to
existing or ro osed ublic facilities such as streets
water_or Sew 'r 1 Fes an dra na a ac it es. T e prop-
erty has frontage on a proposed ma or arterial as shown on
the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. The road with 120 feet of
completed. and will connect
ight-of-way i sO s and n io35 thwhen e concept
r
The water and wastewater master plan shows major distribu-
tion lines following this arterial. The development would
be required to meet the master drainage plan at the time of
for construction. a disproportionatershareeof rintensityeallocationiteria
2. The topography of the land in the planning area and the_
velo ment. The concept plan shows a diversity
osed de
ro to use the topography as a deter-
of an uses attempting
` mination for the location of certain land uses. The planned
development zoning would allow the City to review the final
layout of each parcel to further determine the impact on the
floodplain, floodway, trees and other natural vegetation in
the area. The topography in this area would allow higher
intensity development without significant changes to the
elevation or vegetation in the area.
i
I
I I
Z-88-013
Page 6
STAFF ANALYSIS (Continued)
3. The land use in the planning area and surrounding areas. The
area around this property is predominantly vacant and agri-
cultural in nature. However, the concept plan shows land uses
that are compatible with the existing land uses including:
General Retail, Multi-family, and Light Industrial adjacent
to existing business in the moderate node at U.S. Highway 3B0.
Screening and buffering including landscaping and setbacks
would be required between existing and proposed residential
US03 prior to development.
4. The allocation of trip generation intensity in reference to
other policies of the City of Denton, such as the protection
of older nei hborhoods and sin le family housin diversit oft
hous ng, and the concentrat on of apartments and o f ce retail
sites. The concept plan meets the concentration and separation
policies for a moderate intensity area. Area 15, as described
in the Low Intensity Area section, does not meet the separa-
tion policy by approximately 900 feet. The proposal meets
Development Guide standards and policies except for intensity
allocation,
The additional 2,644 vehicle trips appears to be justified based
on the location, infrastructure, topography, surrounding uses and
policies of the Guide.
The moderate intensity area at McKinney Street includes approxi-
mately 98.5 acres in Tracts 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 390 40 and
41. The land uses proposed include general retail, single family
attached, park, cluster housing, office, community facility and
multi-family. The infrastructure proposed for the area would
provide adequate service.
i
The area uses all the intensity allocated to the moderate area.
Since all four corners of the intensity area would be planned,
expansion is unlikely.
In moderate intensity areas, multi-family is limited to 750 units
and good site design standards such as large setbacks, landscaped
front yards, screening fences and traffic directed to collector
streets or larger should be reviewed. The moderate intensity area
at U.S. Highway 380 includes 545 units in Tracts 5 and 8, *nd the
moderate intensity area at FM 426 (McKinney Street) includes
751 units in Tracts 39 and 41. The planned development zoning
insures that the Commission and City Council can review the design
of the multi-family areas with the detailed plan.
I
N
r
Z-88-013
Page 7
STAFF ANALYSIS (Continued) -
I
F Low Intensity Areas: _
The primary purpose of low intensity areas is to insure an overall
land use balance and are predominantly residential in nature. The
areas should be designed to accommodate low density residential,
multi-family and neigborod her gross acre, service
according tottheiGuide. The
1 of 75 trips per day ay p 9 f
I proposal includes 600.2 acres Thep concept planhis117% underithe
area excluding right-of-way.
ng
than ntheir standari developersfoarrethveequ0e0s.t2iless
Concentration and Separation Policies:
The Development Guide states that in low intensity areas non-
residential land uses, such as Neighborhood Service, General
Retail, and Office, should have a concentration of not more than
four acres and be separated from other concentrations of non-
residential land uses by at least 1/2 mile. The concept plan
includes three tracts to be evaluated in regard to this policy.
Tracts 15, 231 and 28 are all four acres in size. Tract 15 is
located approximately 1,700 feet from the moderate node at
U.S. Highway 380, Tract 23 is approximately 2,700 feet from
another concentration, and Tract 28 is approximately 2,700 feet
from 2i51200 feet
NeighborhoodmSethe rviced(Tract node
at McKinney Street. The proposed 15)
area at Blagg Road and proposed Lakeview Boulevard does not meet
the separation requirement since Office is proposed approximat
11700 feet to the northi however, the location at the intersection
of the two roads does appear to be a more logical location for
this land use instead of placing it off the intersection where
r the land use would meet the separation requirement.
In low intensity areas, according to the Development Guide, multi-
family residential development with 12 or morerunitslperacr esis
limited to 200 units separated by 1/2 mile
200 units on eight acres. The tract is farther than 2amile
reas
from the multi-family proposed in the moderate intensity
at U.S. Highway 380 and McKinney Street.
Other Policies:
The Development Guide states that continues housing
encouraged, The policy y con
housing patterns should be well planned to insure that neighbor-
hood integrity is maintained. The concept plan has a diversity
of housin~4 types and lot sizes.
I
i
I
Z-88-013
Page 8
STAFF ANALYSIS (Continued)
The concept plan indicates 34.3 acres of lark land and 30.1 acres
of combined park and school land for a total of 64.5 acres. The
City guide for park land dedication is one acre per 100 dwelling
units or three acres per 1,000 population. Based on these guide-
lines and total units proposed of 4,368 on the concept plan,
forty-four (441 acres of park land would b~ required; and based on
a population projection of 12,061 for the ,oncept plan, thirty-six
(36) acres of park land would be required. Approximately 22 acres
of the par% land is outside the floodplain and additional acreage
may be reclaimed. The concept plan meets the park land dedication
guidelines.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended pproval of Z-88-013
with the following conditions by a vote of to 3:
1. All information waived by the Planning and Development
Department at the Concept Plan stage must be submitted
with the Detailed Plan) including: location of lots in
a residential subdivision; location of major drainage
facilities and improvements; location of major electrical
lines; and location, size and type of al. fences, berms,
or screening features.
r
2. Tracts 12, 18, 20, 22, and 32 designated on the Concept
Plan as parks or parks/school shall be d hated to the City
of Denton with the first approved final flat for the phase
in which the property is located (exclud:ng platting for
public improvements only).
3. Road construction and improvements shall be completed in
accordance with the attached phasing sch(dule. No building
permits shall be issued for the next phase of development
until the bridge structure linking the ptases has been
completed.
4. Land uses permitted in the following cate)ories shall be in
accordance with the applicable sections o° Appendix B, Zoning
Ordinance, of the Code of Ordinances. Tha following specific
restrictions are imposed:
Light Industrial; Land uses shall be approved with the
detailed plan for those tracts. Uses to )e excluded from
Light Industrial areas are:
I
i
I
Z-88-013
Page 9
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Outside a Building
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
General Retail: Article 7, Subsections G and H.
Office: Professional and Administrative Offices,
Ne g orhood Service: Article 7, Subsection H,
Commu~~nit~y~FFacilit : Land uses shall be approved with the !
Netal~la~those tracts. Community facility uses may
include:
Art Gallery or Museum
Cemetery
Church or Rectory
College or University
Public School
Private School
Community Center
Day Nursery, Day Care or Kindergarten
Hospital
Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature
Library
Nursing Home or Residence Home For Aged
I
z-ss-a13
Page lU
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
Park, Playground or Public Community Center
Fire Station or Similar Public Safety Building -
Public Building of Local, State or Federal Government
Other similar uses approved on detailed plan.
5. No access to 'tracts 6 and 9 shall be permitted on Trinity Road.
6. A Road Utility District shall not be used to finance the
construction of the roads.
ALTERNATIVES
I
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
3. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map - Page 1
2. Concept Plan - Page 2-3
3. Development Standards - Page 4-7
4. Summary of Zoning Restrictions - Page 8
5. Typical Lot Layouts - Pages 9-13
6. Phasing Schedule - Page 14-36
7. Lakeview Utility Plan - Page 37
8. Intensity Analysis PD-126 Z-1779)- Page 38
9. Existing Zoning Land Use Summary - Page 39
10. Intensity Analysis Z-88-013 - Page 40-41
11. Residential Land Use Summary Z-88-013 - Page 42
12. Land Use Summary Z-88-013 - Page 43
13. Total Units Chart - Page 44
14. Total Residential Acres Chart - Page 45
1S. Ordinance 87-008 - Page 46-65
16. Background Information - Page 66-67
17. Denton Development Guide Policies - Page 68-69
18. 1; ary o zoning ase and Previous Zoning Cases - Page 7U-71
19. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July 27,
1988 - Page 72-80
20. Neighborhood Parks Page 81-86
E
i
i
1197k
i
i
I
s8-m0 1 3 ATTACHMENT 1
LAKEVIEW
JAWY' 380
SITE
ti
SLA00 00.
C►
CITY OF / 11,0,00
OENTON •.¢e1,
MILLS R0.
E '
C4 M kin's y
CL
' LAKE '
0 LEWISVILLE
E
r o~ f
I
,
F /
iN
, CORIN H
LOCATION MAP
ATTACHMENT 2a
u•o w vr•M/~
LMIII~IR
a,.r
Poo
• . w.. _ _ ~y Iwo ~ .
I
- w *T
-
- Y1V
M r '
w
n ~r
w.r•Rr J
w
- 1 µ
Laww~
- - uy. miuou ~
Sr1. .
Ir
Net
u.rw fir' i1
} 1,
I
LAKKVM A .
/LAAA" MVR4069IIf ONW M4 MRN
1011•M~ ~ MI ~ OY
w.rlr01.+~•M 44Yi•YVaI~
rl• YYA. Y YI.~1 • \w~~ Y
IAA RI. W\ 1\.~1 ti M.w• 1.~~ ~m~•RNr
~1 Y.w w~1 O~ \ ~ ~ ~isN 1• rr _
1!I w1A AW AY 1~1 ~M ^
~~~•r •TM r
i
ATTACHMENT 2b
710
Mr u.s 1 4,0.4.
t 4 I
OR
" ke Mi
OO ' 7 4 LI
7 /
na MF
19.0
IF-1 r
IP -A H r
LAalk 4s.t
NI
4.0 CL-I PARK
Ott 11 yo
1I IF A II
17 SF-? 1*4 NI
F- %as 4e
"I 11 F-7 84
le PARK 17 to F; IF-7
CL-I
Mf
8CHIPARK t
PARK N IP ~i
If 4O
0 - 0
IF-t0 II
II N-t0
CL-4 II
w7 E
IR I
PARK
•F-A 4e
a I OL-I
OR
M►
is
I7 i4~ OF r
OR
OIP
1 4.e
w Ofs
LAKEVIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
3 -
i
ATTACHMENTT 3
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
CONCEPT PLAN
07-01-88
1. Statement of Intent of Owners Lakeview Planned Development (PD) is a proposed mixed
use development w/commercial, office, residential, light industrial E open space land
uses. The development concept is in response to: the physical relationship of the
site to take Lewisville; compatibility 6 diversity of land uses; providing community
housing, _employment 6 commercial activity' balance of transportation system w/land
uses; public ssfet w/im roved access 6 circulation; providing improved water 6 sani-
tar, sewer systems 6 maintaining open space greenbelts as well as providing park 6
school facilities for the region.
2. Statement indicating Relation to Denton Development Guides
Lakeview Planned Development (PD) proposes a reduction in density from the previously
approved Lakeview PD. The intention of this project is a quality development for
Deuton in accordance with the Denton Development Guide,
3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed Districts
867.8 acres
1. Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tract:
Total Proposed Acreage
as Single Family Detached 397'8 -
b. Single Family Attached (townhouses, cluster, etc.) 152.5
c. Attached Patio/Garden/Zero Lot Line
d. Duplex -
as Multi-family 54.8 `
f. Office 18.2 f
g• Neighborhood Service 12.0
44.7
h. General Retail
- I
is commercial
2, Light Industrial 5.8
k. Heavy Industrial
1, Other (specify) a School 6 Parks 30.2
i
e Park 34.3
e Community Facility 10.0
y e major ROW 50.5_
e Collector ROW 17.0
TOTAL 867.8 Acres
4 .
Development Standards
Page 2
5. Off-Site information - adla:ent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots, _
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Protected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.)
Refer to traffic study report (1-19-88) submitted with Lakeview PD
1. Buildings{
a. Approximate location. (Shcwn on concept or detailed plane)
b. Maximum heights
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan -
c. Minimum setbacks: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.{
Shown in Summary of Zoning Restrictions
d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidential:
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
S. Residential Subdivisions
a. Number of unite per acre (density):
f
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan.
E
b. Number and location of lots{ (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
To be shown on detail lan j
ce Minimum site$ width and depth of lotas (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Shown in P.D. 2onin Restriction Summary
l
d. Minimum front, aide and seat yard tstbackss (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Shown in P.D. Win Restriction Summary
F
~I
- 5 -
Development Standards
page I
9. Water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplains, other wa utiretention or major drainage facilities
ind improvements. (Shown on x:%x=gAxxs[x plan.)
10. utilities - location of all major sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities.
(Shown on concept WO"4*V Plan
116 Location of trees 3' in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
!Shown on concept amcxSet**Wdplan.) Tree masses are shown on the concept plan.
Detail tree location is requested to be waived until detail plan review and
f approval process. ks, common and recreational areas.
12, Open Space - location and sire of greenbelts, par
(Shown on concept Wxdsba*A* Plan.)
I
' The locations of ma or arks and reenbelt a
Further detail will be shown at the time of re imin
review and approval.
13, Screening - location, type and Size of all fences, berms or screening features.
(Shown on concept osry4oUscldeSd plant)
Not a licabls at this time. It is u that detail screan-AsAilla-bA-~
it w.l err vnVJl
waived until L detail elan rev. .
I
14, Development Schedule (concept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will j
he Submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of
development. All dates should indicate month and year. j
See attachment for Development Schedule
E
I
I
ADDITIONAL RLQUIRLNENTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN
15. Landscaping Plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used,
Not a licabls at this time. It is re nested t a it landreaoa architect+1r a_--
i
design be made a re uir me
- 6 -
1
i
I' ~
i
Development Standards
page 1
16. Signs - show location, type and size on detailed plant otherwise, signs must
conform to article 17 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Not applicable at this time. Any-on-premise signs not in conformance with r
Article 17 will be described on detailed site plan as to location, size and type.
17. Sidewalks. (Shown nn detailed plan.) Not applicable at this time. It is requested
that sidewalk locations be waived until detail site plan review.
18. All information required for preliminaty plat in accordance with Appendix A
(Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances.
(A separate plat is required.)
19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
II' construction and the rate of development, All dates should Indicate month
and year.
See attached schedule Additional schedul information will be submitted-ja
coniunction with detail Plan an oreliminarv plat approval.
i
l
1
I
E
l
E
ab
3/67
s
7 .
E
I
I
1 ~
RECEIVED
JUL 22 1988
~ DEVELOPMENT-
7~1/ga (ReVISBd 7-21-88) pl,p>JUING DEPARTMENT
MAX Xjt NG RESTRICTIONS ~ IAKfVIEW I _ ,
SUMMARY Of ZONI
TYPICAL ~K T 813 DEPTH DTN '0 D~. (STOACO FAR FRONT AYE Mrl ~S a7~1 6PAA MR6 WTb ff iFd'.lAFID _
PISr olrA (ACRES) ACT[ D.U
OBE SIO NT710N hfilE6 MRLAAUNSA LO
sdOIE 7AMAY-10 171.6 10,000 61. 60 A 126 120 i0 151L NA 7 NA DO 1011 10 • ENCLOSE NA It IIT It 4111
9W AS F"Y-7 911.1 7,000 6f. 601 111 Nl0 so 15% NA ! NA Its 10\ 10 2 ENCLOSED NA 4,3 111 6.0 1,611
10, MIN 1 1 1.4 11 111 S.? Vill
fAMLY ATTAOHSD 61.1 SAW 1=001"m 100 10 407< NA I NA ro PARATlO 10 ENCLOSED
1 1 1,60/
NA to
Cm7m NOM" 61.1 NA NA NA NA 16% NA ! PAPA 10 ENCLOSED 6.1 1 166 1.1
m 10, MIN,
rAAll 10 1,11 /.1 !1 I'M /.1 6,111
1 MULMAM~Y 61.1 wt NA NA NA 1011 NA 6 NA to
~'06lID6 11,1 NA NA NA NA 40% 164111 6 OJl ro m 10 17100 6f. NA NA NA M. NA Aa
I1110100110K100 11.1 NA NA IM MA 60% 611.111 1 Its ro 10 10 11200 11. NA NA NA 'NA NA
004R46L RlTAL 61.1 NA NA NA NA 10% .714,11 6 10 ro NA 10 1(to06f. NA NA NA NA NA
,117,61 0 If EO NA 10 111000 /f. NA NA NA NA NA
11011T 16%N111N. /6.1 NA NA NA 1M 1011
COMYONITY NA NAr NA NA 40% M2,11/ 1 to NA 10 11100 IF. NA NA NA NA NA II
fACIUII!/ If.1
_ .1
/CNOOLIIARK 1/.! NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 61.1 NA W1 NA NA
PARK 8
MAJOR 7LO.W. s6./ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TkANA
OOLLECTOR KO.W. 11.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA [JNA NA NA NA NA I
l LLL.. i
TAL/ 661.6
1 IO
f
I ATTACHMENT 3
1
126.
' MpA
C
%
' P►T. J
' 0'S.L.
' ey
• G ~
l• ASR
T Llv
ryk, GM. ^ K
nIR
c MAR
j p~Y moo N
1
c7 ~ ,
• w
F
N
nIVA AAA. .I
80
J o
Pa
M15
6!4 M
~b K aA
Mot _ GIR N
K ?
Nv
K
wY
30191. ,
LL
SF" 10 TYPICAL LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
SCALE; N.M. GARTER 6 BURGESS 1NC,
ENGINEERS • PLWIVERS
H M IYCM I1MI1.1 0 IW 1111.1/ wD.1M. 11 v 111 u 1
- 9 -
I
„qmp„r.- T. V
am I
1 ,
!i T
116'
fir. • ~1.....
SOP
FAT uv
' •t' ~ 26'B,ll
' I
dr~a
3 W G~ JK
ri/P, GNt. MM
~II~M 1 I J 701. . Mme.
c
• AIR
had
N bN moo 5A
k
nGA uR
K Nr
bR.
b 3, LIB! iAF OAR
1o'e. PAY ab'e.L.
1 A~ k
. rte.. ~.1•'f~. .~....w.,.l. . .
SF 7 TYPICAL LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
80ALE: N.T,JI<. fqjw- GARTER b SURGfSS INC.
ENGINEERS , PLANEMERS
I Itl "two 1104 If, . 101 M I1," 00041M q.11 "I 1I
10 -
1
_ a.
I b' R
YJ
All t h
m ti
Rf a
~N ' '
1
~oI
AM.. 40' SLID .
_ 40
4 ;
m N GR
4' WALK
W GUEST PARKING
o Of i 40
n ~ _ ~OT81L 101A
I • ~ 1
y
r
r
LAYOUT
PATIO HOME CLUSTER •
MILLER Of TEXAS
SCALE: N,T,S. GARTER A BURGESS INC,
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS
wMKO mor,.. blllllrn.a,nl/[MI Polio
- 11 -
I
10' SIDEYARD AND
hl
~i MAINTENANCE EASEMENT (TYPICAL)
.4 PST ~ i
I .
• n Vv. 29 ' 6 i.
0
r
d Er a
C
HbR iAF.
N
LW. K, M • MaR.
~ AT. H I ~ M7.
' J
' u0
e^ J 1
Pot U V. I ArT. ~ 1
N
lam .
K.
p1M~ i I
ri
I bl► !1►T~ ~ • uw
!I `
4J d. LYE/. 6~R. faNK R►T, SF-6 TYPICAL ZERO LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
1-.-T.
CARTER 6 BURGESS INC.
SCALE: N.T.8. ' ENGINEERS a PLANQRS
12 - 11" "COW04n,06 bo.er.•n OWN nwxnr
I
'a , 100
EST PAAK1 0 ;
PEN OREE
I EA MENT 112'PAVW0
300
a0' S.L.
0 EST PA/AxI~NO .
U PEN GAE6 ' O
PEN OREE
r•
T' . oy CUES r PAAK 0
I C .1. j I gl
10
L± \ / 100,
Sol RA,w, _
I
SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
SCALE: N.T.O. CARTER 6 BUM 414C.
ENGINEERS r pIANfVERS
r ran«.ea uuun ~ ~o. H n; rr »au w nuun+r
13 -
i
I ~
ATTACHMENT 6
LAKEVIEW ADDITION
SUBMITTAL/REVIEW SCHEDULE
Submittal to the City of Denton for
Consideration by Planning 6 Zoning
Commission and City Council _
Transportation Improvements
Plan March 1989
P.D. District Detail Concept
Plan March 1989
Utility/Drainage Improvements
Plan
March 1989
Phase 1 (IIIA) - Detail
Plan/Preliminary Plat June 1996
Phase 2 (IIIB) - Detail
Plan/Preliminary Plat March 1995
Phase 3 (IVA) - Detail
Plan/Preliminary Plat September 1996
Phase 6 (W6) - Detail
Plan/Preliminary Plat March 1998
1
i
i
RECEIVED
Jul 2 2 1989
PLANNING A DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
C&B No. P187008001
14 -
i
i
40
LAKEVIEW ADDITION
DEVELOPMENT PHASING SCHEDULE
X of Site Plan Development
Phase Acreage Tracts Pro ect Submittal/Review Start
1
(IIIA) 98.5 32 thru 41 12 June 1994 Sept. 1995
2
(IIIB) 150.2 27 thru 31 149 March 1995 June 1996
3
(IVA) 246.4 1 thru 11 6 31 Sept. 1996 Dec. 1997
18 thru 23
4
(IVB) 305.2 12 thru 17 6 38 March 1998 June 1999
24 thru 26
800.3 Acres
i
i
I~[
I
l
i
RECEIVED
i
J U 1 22 1986 i
PLANNING & of ELOIIIENZ
DEPARI
CO No. F187008001
- l5 -
l~
t
i
ROAD PHASING SCHEDULE
o PHASE IA
TRACTS - 110 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 _
(sea riqures 5 and 6)
Build Lakeview Blvd, as a two-lane roadway
from I.H. 35E to Meadowlark
Provide signalization ats
Lakeview and I.H. 35E Southbound Service Rd
Lakeview and I.S. 352 Northbound Service Rd
Lakeview and Shady Shores
Mons A connection between the Southview Development and
is s improved to will not be made,
until Meadowlark,
Meadowlark just
1
i
I
i
{
i
t
1
l
i
16 -
i
i
PICAM CRIIK
COLORADO OLVD.
II 3
12 14
16 g
17
FIGURE s LEGEND:
DOvNopmOntal Phaaln3
Phase IA ❑ phe IA
Southvlew Development
Mother ri.,e,
- 17 -
HWY. Si0
a
ea_.icc
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
MCK INNeY MILL$
YOKtt wr •
r
1
OOLOAAOO
1. .64
LEGEND: t:
Road Improvamaat ;
S18041
ll 1
ewio,. man
FIGURE 6 O E
Dievelopmsntal Phasing 00
Phase 1 A
Improvements
3
- 28 -
• PHASE IB
TRACTS -'6, 7, S, 9, 10, 15
(see Figures 7 and 8)
Build Lakeview Boulevard as a four-lane,
divided roadway from I.H. 35E to the
northern boundary of Tracts 5 and 7
NOTE: Colorado will be built as a minimum of two lanes from
Lakeview Boulevard to Tract 7.
9i
1
i4
E
r
i
l
4
- 19 -
1
1
J
►lCAN CALIK
I
COLOIIADO BLVD.
6
7
10 9 8
15
0
9
FIGURE 7 LEGEND:
Dsvslopmsnlsl Phaslnp ❑ PLSw Is
• Phase to
SouthVIOW DIVOlopmsnt Ocher Phases
5
20
i
' Kwr. s~o
~I
a
eLba
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
PALLS
WC4INNSY
MCA
t+,
7
j
I
i
LEGEND'.
Road Imptovomeot
s
awtov SNOgs
FIGURE 8
Developmental Phasing
Phase 1 B
Improvements 6
- 21
e PHASE II
TRACTS - It 21 31 4, 5
(see Figurfs 9 and 10)
- Extent. Lakeview Boulevard as a four-lane,
divided roadway from Tract 5 and 7 to
Pecsn Creek
- Built Meadowlark as a four-lane, divided
ro+.dway from Lakeview Boulevard to I.H. 35E
- Construct right-turn lanes at:
Lakeview and Meadowlark, westbound to
northbound
L.keviaw and I.H. 35E Northbound Service
Road, southwastbound to northwestbound
- Corstruct left-turn lanes at:
lakeview and Z.H. 35E Southbound Service
Road, southeastbound to northeastbound
Witan I.H. 35E overpass at Lakeview Boulevard
to 5 lanes
3
i
f
7
22 -
1
►LCAK CAKIK
2 -
4
COLORADO OLVD.
9
FIGURE 9 LBOPM
Developmental Phasing
Phase II ❑ PZuae 11
8outhvlew Development other Pyie,
e
23 -
nwv. Rio i
aLroo i
= S v
LAKE
LEWISV IL LE
McRINN~r MILLS
MOR K
f
I
WloAApo I
j,'
I LEGEND:
Road Improveftsat
Tura Laae
h I '
FIGURE 10
Developmental Phasing
Phase II
[vol Improvements
io
24 -
I
• Build the bridge over Pecan Creek
• PHASE IIIA
TRACTS - 321 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 381 39, 40, 41
(see Figures 11 and 12)
- Extend and widen Lakeview to six-lanes from
I.H. 35E to the northern and of Tract 33
- Provide signalization ate
Lakeview and Colorado
Construct right-turn lanes at:
Lakeview and McKinney, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and I.H. 35E Northbound Service
Road, northwestbound to northeastbound
- Construct left-turn lanes at:
Lakeview and McKinney, northbound to
westbound
- Widen I.H. 35E overpass at Lakeview Boulevard
to 7 lanes
NOTE: McKinney Street (P.M. 426) is assumed to be built to
the designated thoroughfare standard of four lanes, divided.
NOTE: Signalization and widening to a five lane section of
Meadowlark Road at Z.H. 352 is assumed.
i
j
i1
25 -
1
OLA00
15 Q
23
18
MILLS
19
22/ -
000PEN
28/ CREEK
30
32
31 ° -
33/ /36
4ekfk"SY 5 38
1 37/ 40
f 39
k WAN cREiK 41
1 LAKIVIRW
LEGEND
BLVD. .
FIGURE 11 ❑ Phase IIIA
Developmental Phaainq
Phase 111A Other Rues
• Lakeview Development 12
26 -
{
t I
4
i
r
ALRQ0
' i
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
MCKINNIV
U04"
G
10
L OMMOAADO !
i
i
LEGEND:
x sits .
Rood lmorowmset
~l Tars Lose J'~ .~s=s•~s~~
® fla s„ar~
Bridle
FIGURE 12
DwNopmontnl Phooln4
Ph&" III A
Improvements 23
27 -
i
t
a PHASE IIIB 29, 30, 31
I TRACTS - 27, 28r
(see Figures 13 and 7.4)
Extend Lakeview Boulevard from Tract 33 to
` j - Tract 22 as a six-lane, divided roadway
f construct right-turn lanes at:
Loop S288 erviceaRd, asouthboundEtoo northwest-
bound
Loop ServiceaRd, anorthboundEtoosoutheast-
bound
i
r 1
I
1
1
i
i
I 1
I
i
f
34
-28-
i
1
'A '04
IMAGO
15
23
18
wl«s
_
19
22/
ooonot
27
280L CA91K
OOWON
30 29
32
31
3b
Y•KfAWN 3 38
37/ 40
39 41
aCAN CAIRK LLAKSwsw LEGEND:
F113URE 13 BLVD. ❑ Phan 1118
Developmental Phasing
Phase 1110 oehrr Phu"
Lakeview Development is
29
I
~r Hwr. era
SLA00 1
l7_7 3 \VI
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
~LLf
ueKU+rHr
MORN y1
.
i
L 00UMACO
t11
j
LEGEND:
Road Improvelsaal
Turn Lana
r+AO. s+ar•
FIGURE 14 +
oevelopmental Phasing
phase III 0
Improvements
16
30 -
1
1
4
i
• Build the bridge over Cooper Creak
• PHASE IVA
I TRACTS - 1, 2, 3, 41 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ll, 181
191 20, 21, 22, 23
(sae Figures 15 and 16)
- Extend Lakeview as a six-lane, divided
1 roadway from Tract 22 to U.S. 380
1 - Provide signalization ate
Mayhill and Blagg
Mayhill and Mills
Lakeview and Blagg
Lakeview and Mills
Lakeview and F, X. 426
- Construct right-turn lane■ ate
Lakeview and U.S. 380, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and McKinney, southbound to
westbound
Lakeview and Colorado, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and Meadowlark, westbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Shady Shores, southbound to
westbound
Construct left-turn lanes ate
Lakeview and U.S. 380, westbound to
southbound
Lakevira and McKinney, eastbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Colorado, eastbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Meadowlark, southbound to
eastbound
r
NOT81 McKinney Street and Mayhill Road are assumed to be
built to their designated thoroughfare standox'i.
i
NOTES Mills Road and Blaqq Road are assum4d to be r ~veableo
Future study may be required if they are not in an acceptable
state for motor vehicle use.
I
r
I
17
- "s 1 -
I ,
4 5 6
8 9
'3, !1
{IAAO
15
23
18 20
MILLS
19
22/
COOPEN
28/ CREEK
30
32
31
~•~,N~33~ 38
37~ 40
39 41
PECAN CREEK AXEVIEw LWEND.
FIGURE 13 U Phm IVA
Davalopmantal Phasing otlw Mw
Pha" IVA
LakaVlaw Davalopmant is
32 -
Mwv, uo 1
et~Go
3
o a
o
Lxxe
Lewisvlue
Mus
Ott K INN(Y
M0489
of
~I
i
s
OOl0AA00
i
LEQEND:
Rood Iroproveeeeol
«1 Turo Lose
slsoal "''01s"oRte
Bridge
FiOURE 16
Dsvwlopmsntsl Phsslnq
Phss* IV A
Improvimsnts 19
33 -
i
e PHASE IVB
TRACTS - 12, 131 14, 15, 16, 17, 24, 25, 26 and
all remaining tracts
(see Figures 17 and 18)
Construct right-turn lanes at:
+Mayhill and McKinney, northbound to
eastbound, southbound to westbound
Loop 286 and I.H. 35E Northbound
Service Rd, northwestbound to
northeastbound
Construct left-turn lane at3
+Mayhill and McKinney, westbound to
southbound
NOTES If the bridge across I.H. 35E is not widened, then
additional studies should be submitted prior to advancing in
the sequencing schema.
NOM If Loop 288 Bypass is not built, there would not be any
major impact on the transportation system caused by the
Southview and Lakeview developments.
* Prior to the development of each tract of land, a detailed
plan, meeting the requirements of Article 11 of Appendix B-
Zoninq of the Code of Ordinances, shall be submitted for City
i Counoil approval, after recommendation i■ made thereon by the
Planning and Zoning commission. concurrent with the
submission of the first such detailed plan, a Transportation
Improvement Plan addressing these specific traffic
improvements necessary to serve this entire phase of
development, without altering the improvements associated
with Lakeview Boulevard, shall also be submitted and
approved.
1
21
3,.
-
1
i
f /
I
r~
/1A00
15 13 2
16 14, 23
17 0
17 4
18 25 t,
Ylll/
26
19
22/
28, COOPER
CIII/K
30
32
31
y#kj,V 33 336
8
37/
40
PICAN CKIIK 39 41 LEGEND:
AK/VIIw
OLVD. ❑ Phue IVS
FIGURE 17
Developmental phasing mother Pham
Phase IVB
Lakeview Development
zz
35 -
1
Hwy. 340 ~
elAOO
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
~ ~cKINNe1' ~ yLL!
I 1~ ,r
Mona ~
ray
r
COLORAoo
I
LEGEND:
T~ +
h Tura Lane f fie'+, i
* To be Determlaed LAW
~Dr e"a►t!
FIGURE 18
Develapmentat Phaeln8
Pha" IV 8
` Improvements 23
-36-
i
ATTACHMENT 7
Ilan YI'+
xar
^4~ I
.ql amf
y 'Q
. wr J~ p r
o
00
00
co
Y
W~
mn.
11
vl. 9 a•a1 R
~I~~nHiM JN1iP Y11.! ,
■
\ iAa i
Ij
.c
y7lrhr t 1
~wY..~+wrrww
VfVrY ■M11~17 1
LAKEVIEW
r wrn o■vwaw~IV7 0■M0R4 n■A■
rrruMO , MI 4 1N1 ^
w,..~w■rVlarr■ Iuwrw~..rl.■
~a■ .Raa1 ua w.r R wRW ■Ri rn 37
.rn ■ ~ w rwr 1. r.esl. w~ ~ c~..
r~YY~1 F~.~~ VM~W •YO1 Nl~
~1l YYnaY IYM ~ MM~'ilnaY hW
1
ATTACHMENT 8
INTENSITY ANALYSIS
2-1779
Trac WD_ a~/Day
A
B 2,260.80
C 4.295.04
D 2,868.00
E 18,755.22
F 3,081.60
O 1,101.12
H 1,138.15
I 1,375.50
J 2,485.35
K 3,619.20
L 1,803.39
M 252.00
N 23,543.28
0 43.140.00
P 1.152.80
Q 782.85
R 3.314.00
S 2,860.00
T 2.864.80
U '.,839.20
V 2,373.12
W 4,350.32
TOTAL: 4 4Lo
131,680.00 Trips per day
INTENSITY CALCULATIONS
Moderate 60ac x 250
Low 643.37ac X 75 15,000.00
Intensity Standard + 98 2 75
63, o
Total for proposed Dovslopment 6 0
_ . 0
6 0.
8 7 108% over
With expanded nodes,
Moderate
(A. B. Co D, and E) 80.84ac x 250 .
Moderate 20,210.00
(K, L, M. No and 0) 160.88ac x 250 .
Low + 90,220.00
449.1Frc x 75 . + _33 A
Intensify Standard -,1 ?_,_Q
Total for Proposed Development 94,117.00
- 3.31.680_ 00
7 3 0 40% ovet
0029k
38 -
I
V
ATTACHMENT 9
EXISTING ZONING
Lakevieas Z-1779
Single Family (Less sfamily access) 332.36
Total Single family units 1,543.00
Density 4.64 units/acre
` Multi-Family
Total multi-family acres 265.74
Total multi-family units 8,028,00
Density 30.20 units/acre
Total 596.10
Total residential acres 8,571.00
Total residential units
Total oensity 16.00 units/acre
Land Use Fercentage of Development
Single Family (SF-10 and SF-7) 361
Cluster/Moderate Density 1Sousing 39
multi-family 9
Office/General Retail 4
Public Use
oRtght-cf•way acreages were not provided.
k
i
I
0lllaNdtlL Mtatl
I
M OWAAJ
►aala-hen
7 -
39 -
40 1
ATTACHMENT 10
MODERATE INTENSITY AREA - U.S. HIGHWAY 30
Land Use Acrea a intensity UFactor IDD/AACO
-rF. -
0 7.0 350 2,4SO
ML cl.b 200 43360
LI 35.6 IUS 3,759
Comm, Lac. 5,0 65
T01'AL 101;o 'ff
Intensity standard 101,6 acres x 250 td/ac ■ 25,400
Intensity standard 15.0 acres x 2SO td/ac ■ +39750
(Minimum amount north of U.S. Hwy, 360)
Proposed intensity -31 794
91 over the standard
Proportionate share 25,400
Requested intensity --31 7799.44
251 over proportionate share of
moderate intensity
With ROW:
Proportionate share
1U6.8 ac (101.6ac + 7.2 ac ROW) x 2SO td/ac 279200
Requested Intensity -31294
171 over proportionate share
F.
MODERATE INTENSITY AREA - FM 416 j.
Land Use Acreage intensity- Factor TD/AC
0 1117.1 7- 355 0 1T"5 I
65 3,420
Cr S.0
425 E
ME 30.0 200 60000
Cluster 14.6 b0 10166
Park 4.0 30 12U
SF 16.0 100 1 600
TOTAL W.T yet 1w Mw
Intensity standard 96.S acres x 1SU td/ac -14 625
01 over the intensity standard With ROW:
Proportionate share
1U9,2 (9b.S ac + 10.7 ac ROW) x 250 td/ac 27,300
Requested intensity -244h7336.
91 under proportionate share ~•~OL
-40-
Page 2
LOW INIENSITY AREA
Land Use Acreage Intensit Factor TD/AC
177 ~1 . s` a-:. 0
SF-7 226.6 43 997S2.4
Cluster 73.5 60 S,660.0
SF-A 46.4 100 MF 6.0 200 4,640.0
NS 12.0 6S0 1,600.0
Park 30.3 30 7,600.0
Park/School 30.2 30/65 909.0
.1,456.0
TOTAL 600.2 370709.4
Intensity standard 600.2 acres x 75 td/ac ■ 4s, 015.0
161 under intensity standard
161 under proportionate share
410 acres & 65 td/ac school sites and 20.2 acres @ 30 td/ac
With ROW:
Proportionate share
649.6 (600.2 ac + 49.6 ac ROW) x 7S ■ 46,735.0
kequested intensity 371709.4
4
231 under proportionate share
t
I
i
I
t
i
- 41 -
i
ATTACHMENT 11
LAND USE SUMMARY
Z-6b•013
Single Family (less than 12 u/a)
Total acres SS0,3
Total units 10872.0
Density 5.2 u/a
Multi-family
Total acres 59.6
Total units 10496.0
Density 25.0 u/a
Total Residential
Total acres 610.1
Total units 41366.0
Total density 7.2 u/aA
AIncludes housing in Moderate Intensity Area
Low Area Includes:
Single family units 20595.0
Multi-family units 200
Acreage 52707
Total density 5.3 u/a
f
I
i
v
0
i
- 15 -
42 -
j..
I
ATTACHMENT 12
LAKEVIEW LAND USE
2-88-013
Lan3 Use 1 Acreage Percentage 17L.U J(1
SF-7 226.6 26
Cluster 86,1 10
SF-A 64.4 7
hJF 59.8 7
Comm. Fac. 10.0 1
0 16.2 2
NS 11.0 6
GR 49.7 4
LI 35.8 4
School/Park 30.2 4
Park 34.3 8
Right-of-way 67.5
TOTAL 667.6 loot
single Family
office/Con. Retail i
9%
Right-0l-key
Multi-Farm
Li4ht Industrial
Public 99Val
Moderate Donelty _ 9%
1 ,
Includes community laeilities
14 -
43 -
k
ATTACHMENT 13
Lakeview
Total Units single Family
multi-Family
8,5'M 8028
8,000 '^s Q
7,500
7400 l
4500 R4001 *U )t 4
W3Y
5000
yS F~ly~
4r500 > }
s' f rrF
444,000
r f• ,
3,Sy o y #f Y ~s 2872
3,000' 'q
Y ' I
z5W
2400 15431496
1,500 ~ Y
i
1,000 k
300
Z-177o (Sxisting) Z-88-013 (propoud)
- 17 -
44 -
i
f
i
ATTACHMENT 14
Lakeview Zoning
Total Acres 11 Single Family
(3 Multi-Family
M Residential
400 550.3
I
' 550
500
450
400
350 332.26
300 265,74
w s
250
i
YJO
` 100 599
eA i A
0 x- M (8xisting) z-88-043 (Pr Posed)
- 16 -
45 -
I
I
I
I
1372L
ATTPCHMENT 15
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.19
AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 690.8 ACRES OF LAND, AS
IN Z NINGACLASSIFICATIONCFROM AGRICULTURALP"A" DISTRICT CLASS-
IFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD"
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY N A MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE DATE. FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF;
AND PROVIDING
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the zoning classification and use designation of the
real property ,ascribed in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, is ,hereby changed from
ricultural "A" District Classification and Use designation t
Ao
P anned Development "PD" District Classification and Use
designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas,
,
SECTION 11+0
That the following conditions, limitations, and restrictions
shall apply to the district;
1, Detailed Plans Required. Prior to the development of
each tract o an a e ailed plan meeting the requirements of
Article 11 of Appendix B•Zoning of the Code of Ordinances shall
be submitted for City Council approval, after recommendation is
made thereon by the Planning and Zonln Commission. That each _
detailed plan hereafter approved for each parcel or tract of land
shall be attached hereto and be incorporated herein by reference
approved detailed Plan.
And each compliance pwith lthehprovisios developed
2. Restrictions on Detailed Plans, The detailed plans
require herein or each tract o an proposed to be developed,
shall be consistent with the standards and restrictions specified
• 46
in the Concept Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorpo-
rated herein by reference:
approval the
3. Trans ortatrio a Io Tanya°eta Peanplan or the prior
submiss on or app
any plat for any land within the district, a Transportation
Improvement Plan providing for the construction and installation
of all major street and traffic improvements necessary to serve
the entire district, at no cost to the City, shall be approved
Zoning Commission. 1 The proposed recommendation Planning minimum,
provide for the following:
(a) North-South W or Arterial Street. A divided, six lane
street, meet ng city specca~o ns, shall be constructed
from U. S. Highway 380, at the northern edge of the.
district, to Interstate Highway 3S-E. To provide for
such street, a strip of land of a minimum width of 120
foot, shall be dedicated to the public prior to the sub-
mission or approval of any detailed plan or the approval
of any plat for any parcel of land within the district.
Two
constructed opriore torotheeIssuance a of buildingshpermits
for any parcel of landdy within the district, gg
fourhlanes of lthee lane north--south-majorrarterial
street will be constructed, in relotion to the develop-
went of the district, or each phase thereof, ar.d the
manner in which completion of the entire street with six
lanes will be guaranteed, either by performance bonds,
monies escrowed, or similar method that would reasonably
insure completion. thereof,
(b) R_epavin of Mills Bla a of sri ri y om-`Tie Rom de respective
pav ag o s an agg
intersections with the proposed north-south major
siterial street to their respective intersections with
Mayhill Road, and the repaving of Trinity Road, from its
intersection with Mills Road to its Intersection with
McKinney Street, shall be required. Tee repaving shall
be to a width of 24 feet and a depth of 2 inches, toTbe
performed in accordance with City s ecifications.
requirement of repaving shall be subfect to the 1lmita-
forneachat rothe ad, as determinedgbyhabidsoobtained by $SO,000
Z-1779/PAGE 2
47 -
1
City or estimates made by the City Engineer. If the
estimated total cost of repaving exceeds $50,000, for
auy road, the City may choose to participate in the
repaving cost for all or ppart of the required repaving
for that road, or if it chaoses not to participate, it
aay designate what portion of the repaving of such road
will be performed by the expenditure of $50,000. The
repaving requirements of this paragraph shall be in
addition to, and not inclusive of, on-site perimeter
street paving and improvements required for the
developwent of any tract of land as provided for in
Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances.
The Plan shall specify the time when such repaving will
be undertaken in relation to the development of the
district, or each phase thereof, as well as the manner.
In which such repaving will be guaranteed, either by
performance bond, monies escrowed or similar method.
(c) bla hill Road Improvements. Road improvements on Mayhill
oa an tra c s gna Cation equipment at the inter-
section of Mayhill Road and McKinney Street and the
intersection of Mayhill Road and Interstate Highway SSE,
shall be made to the extent sufficient to provide for
traffic to be senerated from the district when fully
developed, as determined by the City Engineer. The
improvements proposed shall be limited to a maxlo;um cost
of $50,000 for road improvements on Mayhill Road and
$50,000 at each specified intersection, for the traffic
$i nalitation a uipment. The repaving requirements of
this pars reph shall be in addition to, and not inclusive
of, on-site perimeter street paving and Improvements
required for the development of any tract of lead as
provided for in Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances.
The plan shall indicate, in relation to the development
of the district, or each phase thereof, when the pro-
posed improvements and signali:ation will be performed
and the manner in which completion of said improvements
and signaliration will be guaranteed, either by perfor-
mance bond, monies escrowed or other similar method that
would insure completion thereof.
(d) Improvements to Ma or Intersecting Streets. Road im-
provements, nc u ng necessary turn Tee, additional
rights-of-way, and traffic control,signali:ation, to the
2-1779/PAGE 3
48 -
I
extent determined necessary by the City Engineer to pro-
vide for traffic to be generated from the district when
fully developed, shall be provided for the following
proposed or existing street intersections: (1) U. S.
Hi hway 360 and the proposed north-south major arterial;
(2~ East McKinney and the proposed north-south major
arterial street; (3) U. S. Highway 380 and Loop 288; and
(4) East McKinney and Loop 288.
i
The Plan shall indicate, in relation to the development
of the district, or each phase thereof, when such
improvements will be undertaken and the manner in which
the specified improvements will be guaranteed, either by
performance bond, monies escrowed, or other similar
method that will reasonably insure completion of the
improvements.
The Transportation Improvement Plan, when approved by the
City Council, shall be attached hereto, and compliance therewith
shall be binding upon each and every parcel of land within the
district.
4. Uti~lltL and Drains a improvement Plan. That prior to the
submiss o3-n or approve o any eta a pan or the approval of
any plat for any land within the district, a Utility and Drainage
Improvement plan providing for the construction of all major
utility and drainage improvements necessary to serve the entire
district, at no cost to the City, shall be approved by the City
Cnuncll after recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commiss~on. The proposed Utility and Drainage Improvement Plan
shall, at a minimum, contain the following information:
(a) Water and Sewer Facilities. The location and size of
111 major water an san Lary sewer mains and facil-
ities that are proposed to be constructed to serve
the entire district.
(b) Drains e S stems and Im rovements. A drainage study
o e s r c performed y a licensed engineer
giving the description and location of all major
storm sewer improvements, drainage retention areas,
or other existinII or proposed drainage facilities or
features that will be utilized or constructed to
provide adequate drainage for the entire district
when fully developed.
Z-1779/PAGE 4
49 -
i
I
(c) Scheduling of Improvements. The time w'ien such
utYT ty an drainage Trovements will be undertaken
In relation to the development of the district, or
each phase thereof, shall be specifled, The Plan
shall include the manner in which completion of the
necessary utility and drainage improvements to serve
the entire district will be guaranteed, either by
performance bond, monies escrowed, or similar manner
or method that would reasonably insure completion of
the utility improvements.
The Utility and Drainage Improvcment Plan, when approved by
the City Council, shall be attached hereto and compliance there-
with shall be binding upon each and every parcel or tract of
i land within the district.
S. Park Fund. Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand D~#ilars
($250,0 s Hall be paid to the City prior to the approval of
any detailed plan for any parcel of land within the district, to
provide for the acquisition, improvement or maintenance of park
land or facilities to serve the district.
6. Property Acquisitions. All easements and rights-of-way
for public improvements required to be constructed, or off-site
drains a areas or facilities necessary, to serve the district
shall to acquired without cost to the Ciry. If necessary ease-
meets or rights-of-way for the required public improvements can-
aot be purchased at fair market value, a request for condemnation
may be submitted, in wrthin , to the City. The request shall be
accompanied byt (l) a description of the property to be
acquired and the names of all owners having an interest therein,
as shown by a commitment for title insurance issued by a title
1 company, showing the City as the proposed insured; (2) at least f
two written appraisals of the property to be acquired, performed
by persons with qualifications satisfactory to the City; (S)
copies of correspondence showing that an offer has been made to
the owners of the property to purchase it at no less than the
amount shown In one of the appraisals submitted; and (4) evi-
dence that, after reasonable negotiations, the offer has been
1 rejected,
Upon satisfactory submission of the request for condemnation,
1 in the form and manner proved for herein, the City, upon finding
I that condemnation is necessaryy, may institute condemnation of
the property. Prior to belinninb condemnation, a contract shall
be entered into between the person making the request and the
Z-1779/PAGE 5
50 -
40
City, providing for the payment of all acquisition cost by the
person making the request, which shall include, but not be
ofm the p o,perthe ty,a fees t of awarded
Special Commissions ,eTfilfor ingehfCesakang
attorney'srfees~sand policy I ppncurred, recordin
of the property. If the City chooses to hire an attorney not
employed by the City to acquire the property by condemnation,
the contract shall provide that the contract cost shall be paid
by the person making the condemnation request.
7. A lication of Article 11. That the district shall
r a su ect to t>e prov s
hereafte ons of Article 11 of Appendix
B-Zoning, to the extent that such provisions do not conflict
with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION III.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under ordinance No. 69.1, as amended,
is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification
and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City
of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving
the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and
encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum
benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance,
or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requl,•ements
thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding
One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such person shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or
portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is
Z-1779/PAGE 6
. 51 -
I
i
f
committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such viola.
tions such person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION VI.
fromTthe date oof sits passhall sage, become
and ethe effective urteen is ahereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of
its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1987.
i ,
CITY 0 DENT00 N, TEXAS
ATTESTr
i
i
*CIO+FEN4T0N0TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
.
BY.
i
Z-1779/PAGE 7
52 -
1
I
EXH1311 l
F l LI
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the '1. Forrest
• Survey, Abstract Number 417, Denton County, 'reaas. said crate hainq
shown by dead to R, Bullard and recorded in Volume 335, pats 596, Deed
Recordsl also being shown by deed to A. Bullard and recorded in Volume
260, pals 512 (two tracts), Deed Racordss said tract also belnl shown
by deed as Lot 5, Blotto B, pert at lots 11 and 12. Block B, and part
of Lot 5, Block 9 of the subdivision of said Y, Tarrost Surrey, and
recorded in Volume $0, pale 236, Dead Pecordsl said tract also btinl
shown by deed to Leon lilyel and recorded in Volume 1347, pals 392.
Deed Recordsl pert of a tract shown by deed to Gary `hiller, rustee,
and recorded in Volume 1677, page $62, 1e61 Property Recordsl sod part
of a tract shown by deed to Toe Prouty and recorded in Volume 1661,
pate 413;c heal Property Records, Denton County, Tosesl and being more
!ally deribed as follower
` Balloting for the northeast corner of Tract limber 1 being described
herein, said point being South 03 degree! 09 minutes 45 seconds '4tt,
94.14 fast from the northeast corner of said Prouty tract, said corner
also being in Trinity Roads
Thence South 03 degrees 09 minutes 45 second* 'Jost, a distance of
2226.61 feet to a steel pea for the northeast corner of Tract :lumber
is
Thence cof Bla$ 'forth Road, drsism 31 ega di stance of 1389.31 lost to a~polnthfore corner
in the "at line of said Hiller tractl
Thence South 01 degrees 31 minutes 07 seconds 'last, s distance of
2296.45 feet to s steel pin for corners
Utanu of
Thence South I
1409.18 feet to g o Coov rn+een03 t mnutes 3(Q-311-0) fort Cornell
361.20 feet to a7 Gorirrssant S Mominutes 24 nuasnt (Q-317-V)llot eerntldltanes of
I ~
iditante of
Thence 0.15 foot to a7 Gotitnme t 9 Mominutes 43 emeat (P'316-u)e forseernrl
32
Thomas South 71 degrees Al minutes $7 eeconde fist, a distance ,,t
421092 feet to a Geeemvst Menueent (Q-315-W) for corner$
distance of
HIM (at South to a Govamooor' 13 Msissatee 52
(Q-111-Y)e foreeernert
Thence South 06 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds fat, a distance of
507,43 feet to a Garerasalat Monument (0.313-W) for carnerl
Thence South 01 degrees 23 minate$ 27 secands Wait with the most
southerly east lino of the Killer tract a distance of 1312.95 test to
o point for comer, the Baas being the west southerly southeast corner
f of said Miller tractl
Thence North 67 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds West, s distance of
2606.96 fast to a poiat for corner in the wt right-at-way line of
Ttiaite Road, the same being the set southerly southwest corner of
sets roller tractl
lap l of 3
-53-
I
I
Thence North 63 Oat rata 19 minutes 46 seconds East, with the watt
rttht-of-war line of said Trinity Road, a distance of 733,:1 feet to a
point for corners
Thence North 05 datrto a 50 minutes 59 seconds Fast, with the west
rtgnt-of-way line of said Trinity Road, a distance of 626.53 toot to a
point for cornett
fhance Yorth 87 degrees 06 minutes 62 seconds west, with a south line
of sold 4111or tract, a disunte of 2139.55 feat to a point for
• corner, the saes being the cost westerly southwest corner of said
Miller tracts
Thence North 02 degrees 36 minutes 45 seconds Past, a distance of
3638.93 foot to a point for corner, the same being the northwest
corner of sold %lillsr tract, and also being a point to the South
right-of-war line of Blass Roedt
Thence South 87 degrees 06 minutes 42 seconds Past, a distance of
518.02 foot to a point for corner, the same being the southeast corner
of said Toe Prouty tracts
Thence North 29 degrees 36 minutes 31 seconds fast, a distance of
504,13 feet to a fence corner pasta
Thence Rorth 60 deltas 03 minutes 00 seconds vest, it distance of
828.29 foot to a face post for corner in the vest line of said Prouty
tracts
Thence North 02 degrees 32 mioutae 08 seconds East, a dietsece of
1135.70 feet to a point for corner, the same being the northwest
corner of Tract III
Thant* South 37 de tae 27 minutes 31 seconds toot, a distance of
2632.30 test to the Joint of Beginning and containing 363,825 acres of
land.
r
All that certain tract at parcel at land situated to the 4, rorrest
Surrey, Abstract !lumber 417, Dante Ceuntf, ietmsl said tract betn
shorn se part of Late 2 and 3, block To and pert of Let 6, Block g o~
the subdivision of said H. Forrest Survey and recorded in volume 50,
pole 216, Dad Aotardsl satd tract also being Part of a tract Shown by
deed to J.A. Hensley, Sr. and recorded in Volume $16, pmts 670, Dodd
Retards, and also bein a tract shown to Yuotes -ws Aga" to toc„ and
recorded in Volume 1103, pate 3S1, Deed Records of Denton County,
Tease, sad being noes fully described as followat
bpinninl for the norths"mest sortheast corner of Tract 72 being
deeerM htesins said point also bean the northwest corner of s
tract shown by dead to White and retotdel in Volume SH, Palo $71 of
the Dentan County Dead Aecordst
Thence South 05 degrees 12 minutes 29 seconds Nest, A distance of
247,94 test to a point for earner, the am being the southwest Cotner
of said White troth
Thence south 37 degrees 11 minutes $S seconds cast, a distance of
131.91 test to a Paget for corner, the sane being the southeast teener
of said White tractl
none@ South 00 degrees 24 atnuae 37 seconds West, a distance of
409.57 feat to a covernsont NonmeAt (0.309-V) for totem
PAL@ 2 0! 7
-54-
I
I
I
Thence South 06 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds East, a distance at
192.72 feat to a Government Monument (Q-308-6) for corner;
Thanes South 03 delross 23 minutes 27 seconds Ueac, a distance of
516.21 het to a Covernment Monument (Q-707-W) for corner, the saaa
being the southeast Corner of said Vuecto Yews Agency tract;
Thence Vorth 55 degrees 07 minutes 34 seconds West, ■ distance of
437,10 het to a Government Monument (Q-306-W) for corner;
Ponca 'lorth 4S degrees 30 minutes 54 seconds West, a distsnce of
` 305.19 hat to it Government Monument (Q-30S-W) for corner;
I Thence North 37 do4raes 23 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of
448.62 last to a Government Monument (Q-304-W) for tornul
Thence North 33 degrees 34 minutes 36 seconds West, a distance of
880.95 fast to a stall pin for corner in the Cancer of abandoned .Mills
load the saw being the most westerly northwest corner of told Mueeas
Yews Agency trattl
nonce South 87 degrees 45 minutes 43 seconds East, with the center of
sbandoned Mills lead a distance of 1166.94 feet to a point for cornort
Thence South 17 dedraee 46 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of
31.27 feet to ar-int for camera
Thenee 4orth at degrees SS minutes " seconds taint, a distance' of
335.65 tut to a point for corner, the as" being the southvert corner
of a tract shown by deed to Moorman and recorded in Volume 345, page
305 of the Denton County Deed Racerdat
nonce %rth 19 degreto 51 stout@$ 33 seconds East, a distance of
59.76 tut to a point for comer. the sale being the southeast Cotner
of said Momma tract!
Thence North 01 degrees 34 minutes S9 ascends East, a distance of
60.06 tat to a point for Corner, the same Leial the northeast Corner
at said edema" traetl
Thence South 68 degrees 33 minutes 35 seconds 'Jest, a distance of
61,11 feat to a point for corner, 00 awe being the northwest corner
of said Moersu «acte
nonce Borth 02 degrees 34 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance at
264.21 feet to a paint for Corner, the laem being the lest northerly
northwest comer of said Nueees trsetl
Thence South 84 do fees 54 minutes 27 seeondo fast, a distance of
I w
40.14 tut to the joint of aginatne and containing 29.660 aerie of
land.
All that certain tract or parcol of lead situsted in the M. Fotrest
Survey, Abstract Number 417, and in the William Durham Survey,
Abstract Number 330, Denton County, Teaasa and WAS show" by deed se
Leta to 1, sad It Block F, of the subdivision of $did forrest Survey,
and recorded to Volume 30, polo 236, Deed Recerdsl laid tract elm
being pert of a tract ohm b !«t to Leon L. Fschenbach sad Nenri 1.
Breeberg, and recorded 12 Volume 133, pot. 624, Oead Reeerdal pert et
a tract shown by deed to Bea Atwell and recorded in Volume 669, page
61, Deed Racerdal pert of a tract ohm b) deed to William 1. Shaw,
it., and recorded to Veto* 377, pate 1530 Dead Racordsl and part of a
tract show" by deed to Tom Proaty, Trust", and recorded in Valued
1666, pap 711 of the Reel Proppeerty Records, Denton County, Tau, and
being men fully described as tolloal
lase 3 01 1
55 -
_ J
6e4inning (or the northeast corner of Tract Number ) botn9 deecribod
Rerein: said point 4140 being a Covornment ;lonumenc (q_302
_W) for
• corner:
Thence South 02 degrees $0 minutes 06 seconds West, a distance of
1L6L.31 feet to a Government monument (Q-301-W) for corner:
Theacs South 60 degrees 11 minutes 10 seconds fast, a distance of
5?2.60 feet to a Government Monument (0.300-W) for cornorl
e Thence South 31 degrees 22 m!nutsm 10 seconds East, a distance of
606.29 fort to a Government .Moa wont (Q-299-4) for torasrl
nonce South 40 $acreea S9 $tautss 56 1ocends fast, a dietaries of
S51,20 last to a Government Monument (Q-296.4) for eorneri
Thanes South degrees 51 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of
277,90 lest to m Government Monument (0.297-W) for cornea
Thence South 24 degrees 50 minutes 12 seconds Want, a dt4tanc4 of
157.09 foot to 4 Government Menumnot (Q-2%-W) for corastl
Thence South 09 degrees 40 minutes 42 woods Vest, a distance of
296.62 last to a Governmeet Monuwt (0.295-W) for corral
'thence %nh 43 dograns 04 mtautes 36 seconds East, a distance of
256.99 tat to a Government Meeuwt (Q-2WW) far corosrr
Thence Saath 02 dogrel It minutes 47 setosds Vane, a distance at
443.66 feet to a Covaraewt Momumant (Q-293.6-V) for ceroerl
Thence South 02 degrees 12 minutes 39 intends West, a distance of
949.52 foot to a Govoramsst Menamant (Q-29}W) for coned
thence South 02 degrees 13 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of
435.3S feet to a Goverawt MoOuooat (Q-192.3-W) for coraarl
nonce South 01 degrees 45 mtautem SS seeende West, a distance of
904.09 foot to the north 1104 of said A well trectl
Thence South 63 degr$4s 36 minutes 31 seeonde Use, a distance of
343,36 teat to the northeast cendr of said Avail tract:
Thence South 03 degrees 11 minutes 13 seconds Want, a distinct of
130.26 loot to a steel vial
thence South 31 degrees 03 minutes 36 ascends lest, a distance of
96.24 test to a petot for esreort
Theses South 63 degrees 17 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of
111,15 foot to a point for ternerf
ntnea South 74 dsgreos 57 atame 31 socenta West, a distance of
134414 felt to a point for amorl
Theses [arch 33 degrees It minutes 34 seconds West, s distance of
76.LLfe" td a petot for toreerl
Thence Urth 63 degrees 31 stautsa 56 seconds Vast, a distance of
149.69 foot t6 a Nlat for career$
Thence South 35 dogre" N steel" 19 seconds West, a distance of
232,50 foot to a petat for comers
Thonee South 63 degrees 37 stouts$ S6 aeeeeds fast, a distance of
149,)7 foot to a total for censtf
!cep 4 et t
56 -
1
Is FR
Thence North 23 degrees 51 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of
166.76 feet to a point for corner;
Thence South 63 degrees SL minutes 23 eetondo fast, a itstance of
122.63 foot to a point for corner;
Thence north 54 dslrees 57 minutes 30 seconds fast, a distance of
150.52 feet to S point for corners
•
nonce North 66 degrees 17 minutes 10 esoonds Cast, a distance of
101.42 feet to a pofst for corners
Thence North 61 capons 01 minutes 56 second: East, a distance of
62.77 feet to a point for corners
nonce South 61 degrees 42 minutes SS seconds fast, a distance of
15.00 feet to m point for Cornett
Thence South 02 degrees 17 minutes 12 @Stands Wtst, a distance of
1600.00 fast to a pilot far comert
nine* South 26 deroes L1 minutes L1 seconds Watt, a distance of
276.05 feat to a point for cornert
Th.na South Al degrees a minutes 12 sscoods Vest, a distinct of
220.14 feet to a point for t_rsar is the northeast right-of-way 1100
of rnrstCoMarket load Number 416;
Thence North 47 degrees 37 minutes 51 seconds West. S1o0 the
northeut right-of-ay It" of said rate-to-Market lad Humber A~6, a
distance of 719,39 test to a point for eornerl
Thence !forth 46 degrees 56 minutes 48 seconds West, Stan the
northeast right-of-wq lees of sold fan-to-Market food Number 016, a
distance of 936.10 fast to a pint of curstuta of a tangent curve to
the left chow redlt is 710.61 feet and howlnl a control anllt of 16
degrees 29 siattes 11 eecoods and who" chord bears Nart~. 51 depute
32 minutes 30 aetaaa West, 203.79 Intel
Thence Steel said curve to the left, as ate distance of 204.50 feet to
a point for Centro
Thence North 03 ;egress 02 minutes It Woods Cast, a distance of
1366.64 fast to the northwest corner of said Atwell tracts
Thosee North 64 degrees 59 slootes 53 seconds West, a distance of
411,15 toot to the Southwest corner of sell rechenbuh end 6romberl
Cruel
Themes NOetk 01 degrees 47 sisotes 52 seconds East, a distance of
106.01 lost to a steel plat
• i
nonce North 02 degrees 26 Slaves* 39 seconds East, a distance of
2126.91 Get to me ell termer of said racheobach and Bromberg traett
Thence North 15 degrees 01 mUotes 41 seconds Watt, a distance of
554.33 feet to a paint for cermerl
Thence North 05 degrees 59 minutes 46 inonda West, o distinct of
10,33 foot to a joist for cereort
Thanes North 11 degrees $1 minutes 13 seconds West, a distance of
634.09 toot to a Feint for ca nst ea the "at rlsht-et-way 111W of
Cries" leadI
:ejesoe7
-
- 57
1
Thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of
525.40 feet to a point for corners
Thence South 66 degrees 37 minutes 39 seconds East, a distance of
569.42 test to a point for corners
Thence Korth 16 degrees 35 minutes 54 itconds East, a distance of
146.41 feet to a point for Cornell
Thence North 82 degrees 39 minutes 34 seconds Vest, a distance of
710.75 foot to the southwest Corner of said Prouty tracts
Thence .North 02 degrees 30 minutes It seconds East, a distance of
$61.45 test to a potat for corners
Thence South 86 degrese 23 minutes 31 seconds Use, a diatamca of
194.01 foot to a point for cornerl
Thence North 48 degrees 13 minutes 06 seconds tart, a distance of
28.64 test to a potot for cerner7
Themes North 09 dogroos 28 minutes 52 seconds West, a distance of
72,39 feat to a point for caters
Thence North 39 degrees 30 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of
87,11 feet to a point for eerearl
Thence North 15 dolress 19 stmotes 14 seconds West a distance of
144,36 foot to a patat for arnarl
Thence North 02 degrees 30 stout" It won" Gat, a distance of
827.11 fate: to a point for corners
Thanes South 87 de`ream 04 minutes 14 9etood4 Rut, a distance of
1431.14 toot to the Point of 8egtaning sad Contalaing 246.485 was. of
land.QQ9
`Tract eu-~r'-
Alt that certain tract or parcel of tend situated in the William
Durhea Survey, Abstract Number 330, Dentoo County, Taaal said tract
being part of a tract shevm by dead to he Atwetl and recorded in
Voluw 689, pa~tm 83, Dead Records, and part of a tract shown by deed
to Witlism 8. Shmv, lr., and recorded in Volume 3114 pqa 153. Deed
Records e! Denton County, Tassel and being more if described as
fellows
a
8egiamU for the northeast corner of Tract Number 4 being hereto
deseribs4l said petat alas being is the oowthwest right-ef-way fine of
fermoto-Narkst Road Number 4261
Thanes South Ot degrees 47 minutes At mends West, a distance of
1454.70 lest to a potet for corner, the tan being the southeast
corner of tract Number 41
Thanes north a1 degrees 06 minutes 03 seconds Vest, a distance of
1110.41 foot to a point for corner, the sum being the southwst
earner of Tract Number 4i
Thence North 03 degrees 47 siaotes 49 secenda Rut, a distance of
2323.19 toes to s ppotat for career, the saw being the northwst
corner of salt Treat Number 4 sad also "togs etat in the southwest
right-of-way line of said fore•te-Nsrkst good Number 426, 44td point
aloe being a petat oo a taag44t cur", to the right who" radius is
610.61 foot 444 haeiag a cwtral 44814 of Oa dgrtes 19 stout$$ 15
Peceode, and Ass* thord beus South Sl degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds
rent, 88.60 test is lemgehg
page 6 of
- 58 -
1
Thanta in a Southeasterly direction, along said curve to the rlaht, an
are diseanu of 18,68 lase with the southwest right_ of-wy Line of
amid Fars to-Herkst Road ,Yuabor 426 to a point for cornart
Thence South 46 degrees 55 •inutas 4d seconds Cast, vith the -outhweot
right-of-way line of $aid Far"a-Markat Road Susber 426, a diaeant•
a of 95!,39 fast to a point for cornari
Thsnta South 4? degrees if minutes 46 seconds Cast, continuing vith -
said road right-of-ray
6 Ilam, a distance of 515,62 feet to the Point of
plnning and eontaleing 46,gSp acres of lead.
j
k
i
j
k 1
t
i
1
54
1 r
i
1
i
EXHIVIT "8"
CONCEPT PLAN FOR LAKEVIEW DEVELOPMENT, CONSISTING OF:
1. Conceptual Site Plan 11 pag-3);
2. Statement of Intent 11 page); and
3. Development Standards (3 pages).
1
I
El
f
Ii
t
i
F
2-1779
- 60 -
I
Wr.n.r•
N
,
a• ~
R `
~t
i'ttrs't; i;,
Tr-
at
~i
8; -t
~3 I
DEVELOPMENT
n
I
T
P
CONCE
DEVELOPMENT
Nom
61 -
I
CONCEPT PLAN
Z-1779
1. Statement of Intent. Miller of rexas, Inc. is requesting
app'rovel of"a p anned development for residential and non-
residential uses. The property will be marketed as separate
tracts and will be developed in phases,
1. Relation to Comprehensive Plan. The property is identified as
a o' ow amens ty area-acco"-rdrn to the Denton Development Guide.
Miller of rexas, Inc. is requesting that moderate intensity
areas oe created. The concentration and separation policies
for multi-family and non-residential uses are violated.
3. Acreage. A 690.8 acre tract of land.
4. Land Uses. The existing land use is agricultural. The proposed
land use`s include single family, oulti-family, cluster housin
office, neighborhood service, and retail. (Acreage provided gg,
in
attached chart.)
S. Off-Site Information. Some information provided on concept
plan. Additional Information will be shown on detailed plan.
6. Traffic and Transportation. Specific information will be
prov a prior to appro WI of any detailed plan.
7. Setbacks. The setbacks shall conform to the Zoning Ordinance
for thee specific district identified for each parcel. Parcel N
has the following additional requirement: 100 foot setback
from dedicated right-of-way with SO foot perimeter setback.
8. SianaEs. All signs shall conform to the Zoning Ordinance.
Parcels C and K shall have no detached signs.
v. graina¢e and Utilities. Specific information will be provided
prior to approval o$ any detailed plan.
IU. Trees. 0o en S, ace and ScreeeDn nn Specific locations will be
included on detailed plan for approval.
11. Loreto went Schedule. A schedule in compliance with requirements
o rt c e ToF rfie Zoning Ordinance shall be submitted with the
detailed plan for approval.
O32S►o
62 -
i
r
h
V
1
1
1
CONCEPT PLAN
` MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM OPEN
I PROPOSED
PARCP,L LAND USE ACRHAG¢ UNITS 90UAR¢ PBET OL W . CW ERAGE HEIGHT SPACE IN ACRES
A Single Family 401 2 1.6
Attached 15.10 282 WA
8 multi-family 401 3 2.2
MP_3 22.31 537 WA _
8.78 N/A 19112c0 401 3 WA
C office
i
2 WA
)12,587 406
D General Retail 17.94 W A
I
cn
w
I
¢ Multi-family Ib.OS 385 N/A 101 3 1.6
MP-1
Single family 101 2 1'2
Attached - 11.47 131 N/A
i
h p Com>Munity N/A WA N/A
Facility 13.39 N/A N/A
H Single Family 137 WA 351 2 N/A
sF-10 ]9.30
f ' I single PamilY 351 2 WA
~r.1p 71.01 249 WA
I ~
i
CONCEPT PLAN (CONT.)
i
I
PROPOSED MAXIMUM KAXIMUK MAXIMUM MAXI WIN MINIMUK OPEN
PARCEL LAND USE ACREAGE UNITS SQUARE FEET BLDG. COVERAGE HEIGHT SPACE IN ACRES
J single Family 401 2 7.8
' Detached 37.70 452 WA
K Office 7170 WA 120*226 401 3 WA
L Park 8.4 WA WA WA N/A 8.4
i
i
F
i
t K General Retail 22.52 WA 3921338 401 3 WA
A S
1
N multi-Family 101 7 10.8
KF-2 107,85 51393 WA
0 single Family
Attached 14.41 115 WA 401 2 1.4
I
P Community
Facility 9.21 WA WA WA WA WA
_ i
q single Family 351 2 WA i
sF-7 82.89 331 WA j
R Neighborhood 401 2 WA
service 4.4 WA =WA
I
i
f
CONCEPT PLAN (CONT.)
(
PROPOSED MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM + MAXIMUM I MINIMUM OPEN
3 PARCEL LAND USE ACREAGE UNITS SQUARE FEET BLDG. CW EmGE NEIGNT SPACE IN ACRES
I s Single Family
SF-7 71662 .286 WA 35% 2 WA
T Single Family
Attached 22.99 184 WA 401 2 2,3
U single Family
Detached 24,72 297 N/A 40% 2 2,5 4
i Y single family
Attached 30,28 545 WA 401 2 310
o,
N
N single family
Detached 30,18 241 WA 40% 2 310
1
i
r
M
0)29o
i
' I
i
r
t
h
f
I`
1
I
ATTACHMENT 16
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Z-88-013 and Z-1861
Prior to any discussion about a project called Lakeview, the City
of Denton annexed 47U acres of property from U.S. Highway 380 south
toward McKinney Street following Trinity Road and the Corps of Engi-
neer property along Lake Lewisville. Ordinance 84-98 was adopted by
the City Council to annex the property in order to control develop-
ment on the 470 acres, because the property owners at the time had
informed the staff that mobile home parks and small and estate resi-
dential lot subdivisions were proposed as land uses for the area.
In 198S, Miller of Texas, Inc., now RMB Realty, Inc, requested
annexation of 304.9 acres located along Trinity Road and Lake
Lewisville and extending from north of Mills Road to south of
McKinney a 9zoning following
application annexation
submitted
to the City of Denton for creation of a planned development zoning
district. A public hearing on Z-1779 was conducted by the Planning
and Zoning Commission on December 4, 1985, and the Commission recom-
mended approval by a 3 to 2 vote. The City Council held a public
hearing on January 7, 1986 but tabled the zoning request (Z-1779)
in order to review additional information. At the February,4, 1986
City Council meeting, the Council recommended the preparation of an
ordinance changing the zoning to the planned development zoning
district. Ordinance 87.008 was adopted by the Council on January 6,
1987 zoning the property Planned Development-126,
In March of 1986, following the City Council public hearing and
recommendation on Z-1779, applications for establishing a planned
development zoning district and annexing 66.U01 acres were submit-
ted. 'The annexation of property at the northern edge of Z-1779 and
extending to U,S, highway 380 was approved by the City (Ordinance
86-140) but the zoning application was withdrawn by the petitioner
prior to public hearing by the Commission.
Included in the area now identified as'Southview, several annexations
and zoning requests h s have and occurred. In 1984, 66.5 annexed acres at the south-
west r
(Ordinance84-97). Azoningrequestwas submittedforya tmanufactured
housing subdivision in conjunction with the annexation; however, the
City Council denied the request in September of 1984. Following the
dental, requws to create a 17.10 acre planned development district
Roadfor ggM- Family-7 along
Road gdiSwisher
strict
for a manufucatured housing subdivision (PD-89) were submitted. The
City approved the requests in December of 1984.
-66-
I`
I
I
Background Information
Z-88-013 and Z-1861
Page 2
` In 1986, the City annexed 132.64 acres owned by the Corps of Engi-
neers which abutted the southern edge of the Lakeview development.
Miller of Texas, now kMB Realty, Inc, submitted a request for annexa-
tion and zoning to the planned development zoning district on 299.83
acres. While the annexation was approved by Ordinance 86-130, the
petitioner requested withdrawal of the zoning consideration prior to
public hearing.
In September of 1986, the staff began working with a new team of
representatives including individuals from Carter and Burgess and
Miller of Texas, now RMB Realty, Inc., to revise the Lakeview con,
ceppt play. and zone additional property owned by RMB Realty, Inc.
Prior to this date, the City had not dealt directly with the owners
of the property. On June S, 1987, some nine months after the first
discussion with the new team, two applications for zoning were sub-
mitted. One application for planned development zoning on 837 acres,
including the existing planned development, was submitted and later
revised to 867.8 acres which included an additional 30,2 acres for a
school/park site. The other application was submitted for planned
development zoning on 414.9 acres including PD-88 and PD-89.
After a year Iong review and negotiation process, a public hearing
was scheduled before the Planning and toning Commission at its meet-
ing of June 7, 1988. The Commission unanimously denied the Lakeview
request stating among other reasons that the zoning request violated
f the intensity by 17 percent and the density of the request was 9.49
units per acre. The petitioner requested that the Southview zoning
request be withdrawn prior to the public hearing.
The two zoning proposals were revised to address some concerns of
the Commission and were submitted for consideration at the Commis- E
sion meeting of July 27, 1988. The Lakeview request was.recommended
for approval, and the Southview request was tabled until the
September 14, 1988 agenda. The Southview zoning case was tabled at
the request of RMB Realty, Inc. In order to provide time to revise
the concept plan and to address concerns of the aJjacent property
owners. The Commission held a public hearing on September 14, 1988
to review a revised concept plan and recommended approval.
1S17x
9/28/86
` 67 -
i
I
f
ATTACHMENT 17
LhVhLUPMhN'I GUIUt
_ e U 1,1
v intensity
Z-bb•U13
Moderate center at U.S. Highway 36U 91 over stanaara
171 over proportionate
scare
Moderate center at McKinney Street Ui over stanaard
b% unaer proportionate
share
Low Intensity Area 161 under stanaard
231 under proportionate
share
Overall project intensity 51 under standard
Z-1861
Low Intensity Area 61 under standard
61 under proportionate
share
Overall project intensity 61 under standard
o Concentration of Multifamily
Z-88.013 Conforms with policies
Z-1861 Conforms with policies
o Separation of multifamily concerntrations (1/2 mile or 2,640 feet)
Z-88.013 Conforms within project
2-1861 Conforms within project
Tracts 39 and 41 of Z-38.013 and Tract 3 of Z-1861 are located i
2,100 feet apart.
i
o Concentration of non-residential land uses in low intensity areas
1.68.013 Conforms with policies
Z-1861 Conforms with policies
except Tract 6 is 12 acres
" See pages 19 and 22 for calculations
68 -
1
N
Page 2
o Separation of non-residential land uses (112 mile or 2,640 feet)
Z-88-013 Conforms with policies
except Tract 15 is 10700
feet south of moderate
area
Z-1861 Conforms with policies
o Diversity and Protection of Housing
Z-88-013 Conforms with policies
Specific land uses
provided separately
Z-1861 Conforms with policies
Specific land uses
provided separately
I
I'
6 p .
1
I' I
ATTACHMENT 13
S UNIRA R Y
o Intensity Standard (Denton Development Guide)
Existing zoning 10 over
Proposed Lakeview St under
Proposed Southview 61 under
o Density (units per acre)
Existing Lakeview Plan: 16.0 u/a
Proposed Lakeview Plan: 7.2 u/a"
Proposed Southview Plan: S.1 Va.
"Overall density 7.2 u/a - Low intensity area density S.3 u/a
o Public Use (Percentage of Development)
Existing Lakeview Plan: 41
Proposed Lakeview Plan: 81
Proposed Southview Plan: 61
o Parks and Schools
Property dedicated in existing plan:
31.0 acres total and $250,000 payment
(8.4 acres parks and 22.6 acres schools)
Proposed Lakeview Plan (Z-88.013):
64.S acres parks to be donated
and school sites to be negotiated
i
Proposed Southview plan (Z-1861):
28.0 acres donated for parks
includes 10 acres for joint school/park
Park land dedication standard of 1 acre per 100 dwelling units
Existing toning (PD-126) - 96 acres
Proposed Lakeview (Z-88.013) - 44 acres
Proposed Southview (2.1861) 17 acres
Dedicated in Lakeview/Southview (with schools) - 92.5 acres
Park land dedication standard of 3 acres per 19000 population
Existing toning (PD-126) - 96 acres
Proposed Lakeview (Z-88.013) 36 acres
Proposed Southview (2.1861) - is acres
Dedicated in Lakeview/Wi thview (with schools) - 92.S acres
1197k _ 70
i
1"XVI£N
Recommended
Original Zoning Proposal Denied Proposal Development
(06/08/88) (07113/88) Guide Standards
(Pp-126) _
690.80 ac 867.80 ac 80.80 at N/A
Total Acres
Intensity No./% 131,680 Wet 117,258 td/ac 94,241 td/ac 75 td/ac - Low
(1082 over) (61% over) (5% under) 250 td/ac - So-Aerate
Density 16 We overall 9.49 u/a overall 7.2 u/a overall 4.7 Units/Acre rensity ula Low* Low - Gross (Units Per Acre) 5.3 u/a Low"
332.36 ac 448.70 at 550.3 at N/A
Acres SF
Acres MF 265.14 at 87.00 ac 59.8 ac NIA
Acres of Perk land 8.40 at Park/ 40.3 at Park 34.3 ac Park NIA
' 22.60 at Schools 30.2 ac Jt. 30.2 at Jr.
Park/School Park/School
Parcel A - 282 Units Parcel 25 - Conforms With Moderate 0 Units
750 t Concentration of Policies Units 6
Multi-Family Parcel 8 - 537 Unite 957 Units r, Parcel E - 385 Units
Parcel N - 5,393 Units
Parcel U - 297 Units
Parcel V - 545 Units
Separation of Little or No Separation Conformed With projects Within 1/2 Mile or 2,640'
Multi-Family Policies
Concentration of Violation In Parcel K - Conformed With Conforms With 4 Acre,
Non-Residential 7.7 at (0), M - 22.52 ac Policies Policies
Land Uses in Low ((;R), and R - 4.4 ac (0)
I
Intensity Areas
Separation of No separation between Conformed Except Conformed Except 1/2 Mile or 2,640'
Non-Residential uses at Mills Road Tract 15 is Tract 15 is
Land Uses 1,700' South of 1,700' South of
Moderate Center Moderate Center
I 101.6 an. 101.6 at 30 Acres for Each Node
Acres of Moderate Use 160'e68aac 99.8 ac 98.5 at Expanded to Maximum 250
Acres
ty includes all the land w.thin the boundaries of the particular tract. A* Net density excludes certain
w Cross densi
areas such as streets, easements, etc.
i
i
r
PG° !1:nutes
Juir 27, 1983
Page 2
PETITIONER; Bud Hauptman, Metroplex Engineering, stated
t a7i-iTie could answer any questions that the
have Commission MAY
have,
I!I PA40R; None Present.
OPPOSED: None Present.
RECOMMBNDATt0h: Ms. Carson stated staff recommends
approve o 88•oi/.
REBUTTAL: None Offered.
Chair declared pub:1C hearing closed.
DECISION; Mr, Olass:ock moved to recommend approval of
TTS~C7. Seconded by Nr, lamman and unanimously carried
B, Z-81-0
13i Consider making a recommendation on the petition
arTRW, ne.pprequesting ppapproval of a planned development
opaent ^(Pp-126)nand slrtculturalr(A).y theerequesteincludes
approximately 867.1 acres of property located south of U.S.
M ghway 380 along Trinity Road and Lake Lewisville and ex-
tends south
more fully 6described as
a ppart of the Moreau Forrest Survey Abstract 117, and the
tti]llsm D. Durham Survey, Abstract 330. If approved, the
following land uses would be permitted:
Single Family • 10
171.0 acres with a density of 3,2 units per acre
Single Family • 7
• 226.1 acres with a density of 1.3 units per acre
S1281e Family Attached
61.1 acres with a density of 10 units per acre
Cluster Moses
lt t acres with a density of / units par acre
Muti•F a ly
59.1 acres with a density of 25 units per acre
Office
• 10.2 acres
Neighborhood Service
• 12.0 acres
General Retail i
• 19.7 acres
Light industrial
35.1 acres
Community Facility
10.0 acres
School/Fork
• 50.2 acres
Park
• 31.3 WAS F
Rlght•of•way
. 67.S acres
290mfosttgenenreplysform was receivedrinetioorynend one hwas
received opposed.
Ms. sun~ryEa Rchangei In the concept t pplan sthat ohave occurred
slnee the at presentation. Me. Carson stated that In
units toothe acre ,dthlitpropotal tneludingaeoddrato node
ire 3.Ssunitsutotthe ecru eShe.added that the euaberredtd
not include the rlght•of•wiy acreage.
-72-
1
Y5: ~ilnutes
July 27, lye8
Page 3
She continued that the existing planned development.
regarding the public use category, included 4 percent for
parks and school sites and also Lrcluaed a donation of
5250,000. She said that the monetary donation was to
prepare Corps of Engineers prcperty located east of the
parcel.
%is. Carson stateu that, in the concept Iln Leing con-
sidered, b percent is designated Enr public use, which
lncluaed OJ.S acres of land for parks to be donated and
one additional schaoL site, Tract 34, which would be
negotiated if necessary. She sold the parklana dedication
standard of one acre to 100 dwelling units showed that the
requirements for Lakeview would be 44 acres. She added
that the parkland dedication standard of three acres per
1,000 population would be 30 acres. She said that in the
Lakeview/Southview area, there was a proposal for 92.S
acres.
Ms. Carson stated that the existing toning w u 106 percent
over the standard and 40 percent over the standard based on
the moderate nodes as they were expanded by toning. The
overall proposal for Lakeview concept plan is S percent
under the intensity standard. She said that the request is
for greater then a pproportionate shore of Intensity in the
moderate node at U.S. Highway 380 and LikevLeu Boulevard.
Ms. Carson r u ted that the area did include ■ 15 acre site
north of the intersection. She said that it was based on
the DevrLopeent Guide statement that the moderate node Is
located at the intersection and the assumption that the 30
acres Is equally divided to each corner et the intersection.
The node could be expanded from 30 acres to a maximum of
250 acres based on policies of the fulde. Ms. Carson
stated that In staff's basic calculation, the 15 acres In
the north were included. She added that the ,actual propor-
thenstandard, wIflthearlght-of-wayawasn included, itnwouldr
be 17 percent over the standard.
Ms. Carson seated that the moderate node at FM 426 is under
the standard based on the Intensity standard and 9 percent
theeelow Intensitytareiewouldobi rilhstt-elofy-wsy
under and without Lntluding the right -of-way woud be 16
percent under,
Mr, Kamm in asked it Ms. Carson would expand on the 15 acres
north of U.S. highnay 310. Ms. Carson stated that in the
locatedeattintersecti hhons. Undernthesresolutionethat was
used by the City Council in 1987, a 30 acre node was
included at the intersection of U.S. 'd' ighway 380 and the
proposed Lakeview Boulevard, She saithat in prep acing
the analysis, the developer requested 101.6 acres to the
moderate node. In addition there is an allocation based
on staffs' interpretation of the Guide, that there would be
30 acres at the tntersectioni therefore, there would be IS
acres on the north side or outside of the development ro•
posed which would be in the moderate node. She said Jet
the overall node, at this point, would be 116.6 acres In
else.
Mr. Holt asked it the Commission was to make a decision on
the 15 acres. Ms. Carson said no.
Mr. Holt asked it the amendment recommended is 30 acre node
at the corner. Ms. Carson stated that the Development
Guide states that the nodes start at 30 acres and may be
expanded with diversity to ISO acres, She added that the
30 acres would be the starting point.
73 -
I
I
F7: silu•.tes
July 1498
Page 1
Mr. Halt asked if the Levelopment Culde stated that the
developers had to allocate for each corner. Ms. Carson
said '10.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the triangular piece of property
located at U.S. Highway 360 and roposed Lakeview Boulevard
was part of the moderate node, is. Carson said there are
approximately 1S acres that have not been defined, at this
point, as being part of the moderate node.
sir Engelbrecht asked what would be the options for the
triangular piece of property in the future. Ms, Carson
stated that one possibility with recommendation from
the Panning and Zoning Conmission and approval of the City
beucreatedatotinclude thenpropertytbetweenrIrinityeanduld
treposed Lakeview Boulevard. She added that it ha: not
been done at this yoint. She said, however, that at this
time, only the toning request and an expansion of the SO
acre node was being requested.
Mr. Holt asked it the residents in the triangular piece
had requested a zoning change. Ms. Carson said no, that
one and one-half years ago a property owner had requested
a toning change and that the case be considered when zoning
was being considered for Lakeview. When it had not gone
through as quickly as anticipated, staff suggested they
withdraw their request. She added that there are no toning
requests currently In the office for the area.
Mr. Holt asked what would happen to surrounding properties
if the Plan was limited to 60 acre nodes and the allocated
amount of moderate nodes had already been given to other
developers. Ms. Carson stated that if all the Intensity
has been allocated the Commission could make a recommends.
elan based on the least Intense, most logical land use fc~
the area, or what would fit in without being too far over
the intensity scale but would be within reason for that
particular area and then the City Council would make a
determination on It.
Mr. Molt asked if there was a possibility that the area
could remain low intensity. Ms. Carson stated that the
property would remain in a low intensity area unless the
Council approved a moderate line bounderg that incorpor-
ated the area. Ms. Carson stated that t city has a S00
toot strip, which would involve approximately ISO feet
ofrU,S. Highwayn310 is outsidehofrthe cityhlimitseitythieth
v
time,
PETITIONER: Alexander S. Bascom Jr., Partner with RMS
eathe ty Cne, and Robert Bass, said he wanted to thank each
of ommissioners for taking the time to speak with him
over the last month regarding his protect, to said the
discussions have /iven them mote tnslg5ht and the cvrrent
submittal was a sincere effort towards compromise on the
part of the developers,
He said '.hat when asked to participate in the attempted
resurrecclon of the cases, two items became clear to him;
that kMB Realty Inc, had been unreasonable for not further
reducin the ex~atin zoning in the north and the new
Proposal in the scutk was not within the development oulde
standards,
He said that the comments he had prepared did not
separate`` Lakeview and Southview and would therefore be
hee would be iretlab a tome ►erhquestionslew was presented
74 -
lufy ~ 1988
Page i
Mr. Bascom stated that the developers have deleted the
middle node completely on Lakeview. In regards to the
moderate node, a five acre office tract has been converted
to a community facility, the number of apartments has been
reduced, the density per acre in the single family attached
has been reduced from the original to units per acre to 7
units per acre, white is actually 6.4 if the right-of-way
was included in the denominator. He said that with regards
to the intensity of the northern node, it is r.ow between 9
percent and 25 percent, depending upon which calculation is
acceptable - either considering or not considering right-oE-
way.
He continued that the node was completely deleted in
Southview at Colorado Boulevard and they have also brought
the residential density within the Levelopment Guide stan-
dards of 4.7 units per acre. He said that the deductions
and deletions equate to the deletion of 600,000 square feet
of retail, 2.9 million square feet of office, 955 apart-
ments, and 4b6 single family units. he stated that they
felt the concentration problem in multi-family In Lakeview
has been resolved and that they have addressed the moderate
node sire and intensity through reduction and elimination
of uses.
He continued that in regards to the floodplain and flood-
way, the developers are prepared to address the require-
ments necessary to develop the property. The people per
acre have been drastically reduced from 2S to 13.9. In
Southview, the node at proposed Colorado Boulevard has been
deleted, but the developers have proposed an additional
eight acres over the acceptable four acres so that there
would be a total of 12 acres for a grocery store .1te. He
said that the dwelling units per acre have been reduced
from 7.1 to 4.1 units per acre, and the people per acre have
been reduced from 20 to 13.6 per acre. The separation
problem was ellmintsed along with the multi-family that was
over the Development Guide standards, The development is 5
percent under the intensity standard without right-of-way
and 8 percent under the intensity standard with right-of-
way.
Mr. Bascom said that the developers continued to be com-
■lttcd to the donation of right-of-way for and the eonstruc-
tion of a six-lane road from 1.3SE to U.S. Highway 390 in
the north. He said that he wanted to state for the record
that a Road Utility District would not be used for the
construction of the road.
Thad 8rundrett, 1100 Macon Street, Fort Worth, stated that
he ws~ a Senior Planner for Carter 6 gutless Engineers and
Planners. He said that in the initial sta``es. they reviewed
existing physical features of the land sucA as topography,
hydrology, natural streams, draws and drainage ways, vege-
tation, as well as the existing toning. They then began
conceptual land planning.
Mr. 9rundratt stated that Lakeview and Southviev planned
davalopments proposed to incorporate a primary thoroughfare
linkage in the fora of Lakeview Boulevard from Interstate
35 to U.S. Highway 390. This primary arterial is proposed
as a stx-lana divided roadway and is to be constructed in
stilts coordinatingeroadway,development phases with
IM FAVOR: Tom Peters sold that he owns ten acres of
property which is located 200 feet from the deadend of
Mcgtaney Street. He stated that the development would
alleviate the coneesticn that is building up in other areas
of Denton. He felt that it would not only promote growth
but would also be to the advantage of the City of Denton.
75 -
1
t4. :~l lima ltl~
July 27, 1986
Page 6
Ray Wilkinson stated that she lives in the area and Is for
the development but was concerned about being able to
change the toning of her yroperty for resale in the future
if all the intensity I. allocated.
Mr. Holt asked ks. Wilkinson If her property was in the
city limits. Nis. Wilkinson said yes, since 1973.
Mr. Holt asked if the developers contacted her or yad offer-
ed to buy her property. Ms. Wilkinson said the developers
had cuntacted her about the toning request. She added a
realtor, who did not indicate if they were associated with
RkB Realty, had contacted her several months ago.
Mr. Holt asked Ms. Wilkinson if she knew how many acres
were in the property located in the triangle that was dis-
cussed earlier. Ms. kilkinson said she did not know but
thought the residences were located on one acre tracts.
Ilene row•ell, Rt. 7 Denton, stated that she felt the devel-
op mer• would be an asset to the City of Denton. She said
the eevelopers worked hard to satisfy the needs of the
people,
Francis Cray sold that she lives In the Southview area and
had contacted those that live around her and was speaking
for herself as well as the others when stating she was in
favor of the development.
OPPOSED: Bill Claiborne, 920 Smokerise Denton, stated
t-hae saw a problem with the moderate node at Lakeview
Boulevard and felt there was room for additional improve-
meets to the concept plan.
Ms. Brock asked Mr. Claiborne if he had any suggestions for
the Commission. Mr. Claiborne said to possibly reduce the
amount of ■ulti•family, single family attached, retail, and
light industrial.
R. B. Escue, 707 Rid`ecrest Denton, stated that the plans
were better but stfl! were not good enough and felt the
Commission should ask for further improvements.
Mitchell Turner, 2118 Stonegate Denton said he fait the
changes were significant but were stlli too high in Inten-
sity. He stated that he did not see a reason for over- i
crcvded developments in regard to the density.
Sue Smith, 1119 Crescent Denton, asked if the amount of
parkland specified was adequate. Ms. Smith, with the Parks
Department, stated that the parkland dedication met the
standards and the acreage was greater than required.
RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Carson stated that staff recommended
approve w the following conditions-
1. All information waived by the Planning and Development
Department at the Concept Plan stage must be submitted
with tae Detailed Plan, including: location of lots In
a ressdentiai subdivision; location of major drainage
facilities and Improvements; location of major electric-
al lines; and location, site and type of all fences,
berms, or screening features.
2. Tracts 12, I9, 20, 22and 32 deslenated on the Concept
Plan as parks or park;/ school shall be donated to the
City of Benton with the first approved final plat for
the phase In which the property is located (excluding
platting for public improvements only).
76 -
~I
PCZ Minutes
July 27, 1986
Page 7
S. Road construction and improvements shall be completed
In accordance with the submitted phasing schedule. So
building permits shall be issued for the nest phase of
development until the bridge structure linking the
phases has been completed.
4. Land uses permitted in the following cote orles shall
be in accordance with the applicable sections of Appen-
dix B, Zoning Ordinance, of the Code of Ordinances.
The following specific restric?tons are imposed:
Li ht Industrial: Land uses shall be approved with the
detailed pan or those tracts. Uses to be excluded
from Light Industrial areas are:
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Aspphalt or Concrete Botching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Collche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Outside ■ Building
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
General Retail: Article 7, Subsections G and H.
office: to essionai and Administrative Offices.
AManorhood Service: Article 7, Subsection H.
Commun mac i- Land uses shall be approved with
tile detailed pan for those tracts. Community facility
uses may Include:
Art Gallery or Museum j
Cemetery
Church or Rectory
College or University
Public School
Private School
Community Center
Day Nursery, Day Care or Kindergarten
Hospital
Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature
Library
Nursin Home or Residence Home For Aged
Park, 8layground or Public Community Center
Fire Station or Similar Public Safety Building
Public Building of Local, State or Federal Government
Other similar wits approved on detailed plan.
77
1
PU Minutes
July 27, 1988
Page a
S. No access to Tracts 6 and 9 shalt
Trinity R o ad pe Permitted on
,
6. If any of the requested public Improvements are to
constructed by the sale of the bonds under the the DcleosingwofotheUSaletandipDsurchasepoforeal property,
the fallowingppnoti pr
ce sha11 be given to the purchaser:
You are
a bThe Lwhevleu a
Utility District. The district has taxing authority
sepparate from any other taxing authority, and may,
subJect to approval of voters in the district, Issue
bonds, As of this date, the most recent rate of taxes
is by the district on real prre,rty In the district
$ on each $100 of assessed valuation. The
votersa ndwhich bonds been which or has been
may, at approved
date,l bee
issued is The purpose of the district is to
provide for th construction and, prior to conveyance,
to the City of Denton, maintenance of a major arterial
street or feeder roads." The legal description of the
property which you are acquiring is as follows:
Date
gnature O e er
"The undersigned purchaser hereby acknowledges receirt
of the foregoing notice prior to closing of the
purchese of the real property described in such
notice."
ate
gnature o urc aser
closfaatof purchaselandesaletel:alltbenrecornednin the
deed records of Denton County.
Ms, Biker asked if each Individual tract for develop-
ment would be presented to the Planning and Commission
separately, Ms. Carson said detailed plans would be
required rnr each tract.
Ms. Brock asked if improvements to surrounding roads were
to be included as In W126. Mr. Clark stated that the
phasing stated that improvements would be made if the
roads were not driveable. He stressed that they "may be
requlred" mot that they "would be required" to repair the
condition of the roads.
Ms. Brock asked that in regards to the development phases,
what the response for parseedics or the Fire Department
would be. Mr. Clark stated that he assumed the response
would be from the station on Lillian Miller and Teasley
Lane and he did not feel there would be a slow response
time.
Mr. Holt asked that in regards to a moderate node, if
the Plan stated 60 acres and the Commission granted 101.6
acres, If the Commission would be limited under the Plan.
Ns. Carson stated that the boundaries could be redrawn
City Cduneiendation of the Commission and approval of the
Mr. Holt asked if the Commission granted the node if it
would harm the city. Mr. Robbins stated that he did not
feel it would be a problem.
78 -
l
1
FG. ~iln(Ite5
July 27, Lb88
File 9
Mr. Holt asked what type of legal assurance the City has
about not using the RUE to finance the road. Mr. Morris
stated that the state law authorizes the City to dissolve
the district. he stated the City Council can dissolve the
district at any time by adoption of an ordinance. He
continued that under statelaw, the district may have been
dissolved upon annexation of all the land identified in
the kUD but if the Council wanted to dissolve the kUD, an
ordinance should be adopted to clarify the situation.
Mr. Holt asked if the City could stipulate that a FAD _
could not be used without approval from the City.
Mr. Morris stated that the City has to approve the
construction plans prior to use of the RUD.
Ms. Brock asked if an additional condition could be added
to state that a RUD would not be allowed. Mr. Morris
stated that a recommendation would have to be made to the
City Council.
Sit. Engelbrecht asked how long it would take before it
would go into effect. Mr. Morris stated that as soon as
the City Council passed it.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked what options could the property
owners for the triangular property have. Ms. Carson
stated that the moderate node boundaries could be
redefined to Include the piece of property.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Bascom stated that the developers were
wTi nng to agree to a condition to the planned develop-
ment that the RUD would not be used.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Holt asked if the phasing would involve
aT-- 's'ciping. Ms. Carson stated yes that a detailed plan
would be required which Includes the submittal of a land-
scaping plan.
Mr. Holt stated that he had two as )or problems with the
development, 1) the Road Utility District and 2) the
moderate node. He believed that the moderate node could
be dealt with later and the RUD should be dissolved.
Mr. Holt moved to recommend approval of L•gg-013 with
ee^dition number sift being substituted to state that no
Road Utility District shall be used for the construction
of a road. Seconded by Ms. Morgan.
Ms. Brock stated that she ws% not in favor of the devel-
opeent because of the moderate nods.
Ms. Brock moved to make on smendment by addin a condition
that all electric service shall be purchased frc■ the City
of Denton. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock.
Mr. yorris stated the developers would have to agree to
the condition, Mr. Bascom said the petitioner had no
objections.
Mr. Morris stated the propertyy would be sold to
Individuals and it would not be possible to require them
to purchase electric trot the city.
Chair called for s vote on the amendment and It carried
unanimously (7-U),
79 -
~I
I
4
i
I
P8Z Minutes
July 27, 1v8B
Pile lU
Mr. Ksmman stated that due to the moderate node problem,
he was unable to support Z-88.013.
Chair called for a vote on the original motion with
amendment to approve Z-68.013 and It carried (4.3).
Nit. Engelbrecht, Mr. Ramman, and !.:s, Brock voted no.
C. Z-1861. Consider making a recommendation on the petition
of R1tB, Inc. requesting approval of a planned development
and concept plan on propperty currently toned planned devel-
opment (PD•98 and k~D-89) and agricultural (A), She request
includes approaioattly 411.9 acres of pproperty located
approximately 1,200 feet north or; s and extending to
Pecan Creek and more fully shown in the Gidern kalker
Survey, Abstract 1330, and the killiam Durham Survey,
Abstract 330, If approved, the following land uses would
be permitted:
Single Family - 10
• 82.0 acres with a density of 3.2 units per acre
Single Family - 7
- 190.4 acres with a density of 1.3 units per acre
Single Family • 6
30.4 acres with a density of 4.7 units per acre
Cluster homes
10.6 acres with a density of 8 units per acre
Multi-Family
. 16.0 acres with a density of 2S units per acre
Neighborhood Service
b.o acres
Communiry Facility
3.0 acres
General Retail
- 12.0 acres
School/Park
10.0 acres
Park
18.0 acres
Right-of-way
36.S acres
Fifteen notices were mailed to propyerty owners within 200
feet; one reply form was received in favor and one was
received in opposition.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that in regards to the
ntens ty, the property It, a low intensity area as defined
by tha Denton Development Guide.
She said that according to the calculations, the proposal
s S percent under the intensity standard excluding the
right - of-way.
Ms. Carson stated the project conforms with the Develop-
ment Guide's standards in the area of density with 4.1
units to the acre In single fully and iS units per acre
with multi-fall for a total density of 3.2 units to the
acre excluding tAe right•of•wmy. The total density would
be sllghtly less with the right-of-way included.
$be said there were same questions regarding the school
site in the 100 yyear floodplain and that the tity has
requested that tAa area be elevated,
mg. Carson continued that a portion of the property
located at the intersection of Pockrus Road and Shady
Shores is toned planned development. She stated that one
planned development is toned for SF-7 and estate-t pe
residences and the second is for a manufactured housing
subdivision. She stated the remaining property is toned
agricultural.
-80-
'W VOW WV"F-W
PTTACHMENT 20
PARR ASSESSMENT
LAKEVIEN/SOOTHVIEW DEVELOPMENTS .r
The Lakeview and Southview developments will provide a total of 92.5 acres
which will include four neighborhood parks with a total of 44 acrea, one
linear park with a total of 14.3 acres, and a community park with a total of
30,2 acres, In addition, there is a four acre access to Corps of Engineers
property which could be leased as community park land in the future, This
corps property could eventually take the deve:opment burden off the 30,2 acre
community park. It could also provide direct access to lakefront property for
Denton residents.
Lakeview
This development will include a 30.2 acre community park which will also act
as a cite for a future junior high school and/or elementary school site. It
will also include a linear park of 14.3 acres that could act as part of a
future greenbelt along Cooper creek out to Lake Lewisville. Lakeview will
also include two neighborhood parks of five acres and 11 acres and the four
acre access point into Corps property mentioned above.
Total Park Area 34.3 acres
Total School/Park Area 30.2 acrea
Total 64.5 acres
[recommended Donation:
Standard - 1 acre per 100 dwelling units
Proposed dwelling units - 41368 43.68 acres
i
Park land donation exceeds recommendation by 20.82 acres.
1
i
i
- 81 -
I
1
Tract 32 - 4.0 acres access window
- access road
- parking
- community park
will provide access to 50+ acres of property which will be
leased from the Corps of Engineers. The area will be developed
as a community park. The additional community park will reduce
junior hi h
the intensity of athletic field development at the g
school site.
The proposed park land donation meats out park donation standard and the
Denton Development plan.
Southviaw
This development
include the floodplaLnhandha10 pacreack of/park
predominately
site.
Total Park Area 18.0 acres
Total School/pack Area 10_0 acres
Tots' 28.0 acres
Recommended Donations
standard + 1 acre per 100 dwelling units
proposed dwelling units • 10711 17.11 acres
park land donation exceeds recommendation by 1049 acres.
' i
t
82
i
Approximate Approximate
Non-Ploodplain Ploodplain
TCACt Type Park Total Acreage Acreage Acreage 1 00 Park sites
12 N 5 *1 4
18 N 11 •1 8
22 L 14.3 0.5 13.8
32 AC 4 4 0
School/Park Sitc
20 C 30.2 1365 1607
Total 64.5 22.0 4205
*The developer will also be responsible at each neighborhood park location to
make sure approximately three acres of land is elevated out of the floodplain
in one area of the park for facility development.
Type N (neighborhood)
L (linear)
C (community)
AC (access to future community pack)
Tract 12 - S.0 act* neighborhood park will serve the residential tracts in
the northeast aces.
Tract 18 - 11.0 acre neighborhood park will serve the residential tracts
in the northwest area.
Tract 22 - 14.3 acre linear park will serve as a natural area and as pact
of a future greenbelt system along Cooper Creek.
Tract 20 - 30.2 acre school/park site
- 1 elementary school
71,000 s.f. school building, 650 students, grades E-6
playground equipment
open play fields
- 1 junior high school
100,000 a,f. school building, 1,000 s Wdents, grades 7-8
3 tennis courts (unlighted) (city/school)
soccer/football practice field (city/school)
soccer fields (city/.chool)
- approximately 20 aces area between the schools will act as the
community pack sits aid will allow for athletic fields, picnic
pavilions, and play areas, etc.
-83-
Approximate Approximate
Non-Ploodplain Ploodplain
Tract TYO Park Total Acreage Acreage Acreage
Park Sites
N i8 17.S
8
School/Park Site
10 7.5 0
13• N
Total 28 10.5 1715
*The developer will be responsible for elevating Tract 13 to a level above the
loo-year floodplain as determined by the City of Denton, so that a buildable
site will be available prior to construction of any facilities on the
property.
*The developer will also be responsible at each neighborhood park location to
make sure approximately three acres of land is elevated out of the floodplain
in one area of the park for facility development.
Type Park N (neighborhood park)
Pack Areas
Tract 8 - 1840 acre neighborhood pack in northeast portion of the tract
to serve the residential areas to the north.
The tract will also provide a natural area along the creek with
a walk/jog trail for access to the school site to the south.
i
Tract 13 - 10.0 acre school park/site
1
-1 elementary school
71,000 s.fo school building, 6S0 students, grades 1-6
playground equipment
open play fields
Neighborhood pack in the south area of the tract to serve the
residential art.u to the east and south.
The proposed park land donation masts our park donation standard and the
Denton Development Plan.
- 84 -
(
Both Lakeview and Southview developments will not only meet our park
standards, but they will assist in opening up access to both the proposed
Pecan creek greenbelt and a future greenbelt that could be established along
;ooper Creek. This development also gives us potential access to hundreds of
cures of corps of Engineers property along Lake Lewisville that could be
leased by the City of Denton and developed.
I
These developments also provide school/park sites that will include two
elementary and one junior high school. It is the philosophy of both the City
and the Denton Independent School District that these facilities will be used
jointly by both agencies. Therefore, any development by the Denton
independent School District at these facilities will be able to be used by the
public when not in use.
As usualf in a situation where we have a donation of land, we can use the
value of the land as a match for Local Park Fund monies from the state of
Texas. This program will allow us to develop these park areas if and when the
grants are approved by the State.
i
~i
11
i
1
i
t
85 -
i
A COMPARISON Of PARK CHARACTERISTICS
Neighborhood Parka Community Park
(5-15 acres) (30 acres)
-neighborhood play areas -large group play areas
-family picnic areas -picnic pavilions for large
group picnics
-2 tennis courts (unlighted) -multiple tennis courts
(lighted)
-open play areas -formal lighted football/
soccer fields
-backstop for softball/baseball -formal lighted softball/
baseball fields
-hard surface play area (unlighted) -numerous hard surface play
areas (lighted)
-no public reatroom 'icilities -restroams and concessions
-no off-street parking area unless -off-street parking areas
on-street parking is limited
-no recreation facilities -recreation center and
aviausing pool
-501 or more neighborhood use -501 or more community use
-no league play or large -leagues and large community
special events wide special events
-security lighting only -numerous extensively
lighted areas
i
i
86 -
1
I~ROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
IN FAVOR IN OPP Tim
UNDYED
I
NO REPLIES RECEI7ED
f
f
r
}
t
i
I
vow., v
ter.... '
z-aQ-o i3
iGQkE yiEl~ Mq/U,vl~ UsT t~Nav~s~,.~~,
Az~ -4117 (Arl)
'I%
~X 585
~f. 2 r3ax Gil D
3~a~ Farvs>Y -Z~-, Sc~c a~
L .OS fir,
~NavrolcJ !•bl h EFA
tip ~u~ - ~,ls 4~a
T d 4 t 141.x,. tful
~fi 2 Fk %a? A. u
i
y'!! Cdfl ~inrred ~%irsst /r~~S Ale,
m f- vfy irvs~
Fib ~{ij Bank/u~r
r3 ay,v
90/ - lya~h Sf,
Ff, 6tbw~h, iX, 7Gioz
~f ~ ,3oX G~ S
. ~i•~~inrl 7Go?o/
Hive lola- ~hrire
/Vor &M
~t "jo)r rX -7(p2io1
~ 3~~I~e fay
16, W/
~I kh~tar. kha/a~
Rf 2 I'~X (012 41
ri~ca~n xao/ ,
}
tUr~lra~~ r3, 5favar-~
T SBA. ;t Bak b/vf~' 6cJ~s f
vbrt : T ZAIR 2
A y
r~
t
~ Via...
4 _ CA~t~~~ ~ SarrfhdiFrv
f i 'IPA-rv r2 vay r7arfrn
r'x l0/8 8
~ ~o.~b~C 3a3
7/oZ27
2 F. 2 0~ 447 A
rlLIT -
fit, d ~bx 625
...__-_-----~-~---~-r---,~-Qtr------
r _____-Rf a r~ ta7
P~~_ nil I1 uskgrav~ _ _ . _
l yIla K, s /-~wy
' r2! ~ ?ax
- t-
T
Zf 2 &>x 42G
!--Tx ?G 20 l
I ,
i
Ce~euiew~xrrf~iui«v
var'r i7• kJells -
T, (2
a ?p se #4
_
*jr was
A A, Lo
E ~ _
NO. _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASr REPEALING THE CONCEPT
PLAN AND CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO THE 690 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE ORDINANCE NO. 87 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PO-126); DISTRICT
PROVIDING FOR ESTABLIED CHAN EYFROM AGRICULTURAL O"A'B'
(I
NED DEVELOPMENT "PD" ZONING UI5TRICT nS SMOIRFEICApARTI~LARLY
TO O PLANNED 7
DESIGNATION FOR 176.97 ACRES OF LAND,
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING THAT SUCH -,AND SHALL BE INCLUDED
WITHIN AND BE A PART OF PD-1267 PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A
DATE. WITHIN THE
NEW CONCEPT P PLAN O OR THE FOR 867 ACS AN LAND
DISTRICT; WHEREAS, by ordinance No. 87-008, the City Council approved
and, as d described therein district (Lakeview, concept PD 126); and 690.8 acres of
l
WHEREAS, RMB, Inc. has applied for a change from agricultural
"A" to planned development zoning district classification and use
designation for 176.97 acres of land, as more particularly
described herein, said land to be included within and become a part
of PD-1261 and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting the approval of a new
concept plan for the entire 867 acres to be included in the
district; and
ion
WHEREAS, on Jul l of? the 19880 Zoning
zoning andsnew
recommended apprva
concept plan for the expanded districtt NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSi
SECTION I. That Section II of ordinance No. 87-008 (PD-126),
providing for approval of a concept plan and imposing conditions
applicable to the planned development district therein created, is
repealed.
j'QN That the zoning District classification and use
designatio~the 176.97 acres of real property described in
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
is hereby changed from agricultural "A" to planned development "PD"
zoning district classification and use designation under the
, land shall toning hereafter ordinance be inof the cluded C in y and Dentont part Texas, and
such the
2-88-013/PAGE 1
Planned development district established by ordinance No. 87-008
(PD-126), so that hereafter the district shall include the 867
acres of land described in Exhibit "C", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
BECTloN 7II That in accordance with article it of Appendix
B - Zoning of the Code of ordinances, the concept plan described
as Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, is herein appLolved for the entire 867 acres of land
included in the district.
SECTIQN IY. That the district shall be subje^t to the
following conditions:
1. Information for Detailed plans. All information that was
not required to be shown on the concept plan, as otherwise
required by article 11 of Appendix B - Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances, shall be submitted with any detailed plan for any
property within the district.
2. Land Uses. The permitted land uses for each detailed plan
submitted for any tract of land shall be as defined or shown
in this ordinance and the approved concept plan. The general
site plan requirements for tracts designated for the light
industrial, general retail, office, neighborhood service, and
community facility uses ("nonresidential uses"), have bean
waived at the concept plan stage. The uses provided for
herein for nonresidential tracts shall be permitted in
accordance with the detailed plans approved for those tracts,
in accordance with article 11 of Appendix B - Zoning, as
amended. The detailed plans submitted for the nonresidential
tracts shall be subject to the following conditions and
restrictions:
(a) Liaht industrial. Tracts designated for light
industrial use shall be used for manufacturing,
fabricating, and proceasing activities, research and
development facilities, and administrative office type
uses. Any detailed plan approved for such tracts shall
be further subject to the following conditions:
(1) The primary activity of the use shall be
confined within an enclosed building.
(2) The following uses shall not be permitted:
commercial or retail type use involving direct
sales or services to the public.
Z-88-013/PAGE 2
Brick kiln or the plant.
Extraction, sale, or storage of sand, caliche,
stone, clay, earth, or gravel.
Livestock plant or feeding yard.
Petroleum collecting or storage facilities.
(b) General Retail. For any tract designated for general
retail (GR) use on the concept plan, the following uses
shall be permitted in accordance with the detailed plans
approved for those tracts:
Auto laundry.
Auto sales and repair (in building).
Gasoline service station.
New auto parts sales stores.
Antique shop.
Bakery or confectionery ship (retail).
Cafeteria.
cleaning and pressing small shop and pickup.
Custom personal service shop.
Drapery, needlework or weaving shop.
Florist or garden shop.
Greenhouse or plant nursery (retail)
Handicraft shop.
Household appliance service and repair.
Laundry or cleaning (self service)
Mimeograph, stationary, or letter shop.
Mortuary or funeral parlor.
Offices, professional or administrative.
Licensed private club.
Restaurant.
Retail stores and shops.
Studio for photographers, musician, artist or
health.
secondhand store, used furniture or rummage sale. i
(c) office. For any tract designated for office (0) use
on the concept plan, administrative and professional
office type uses shall be permitted in accordance with
the detailed plans approved for those tracts.
(d) Neighborhood service. For any tract designated
for neighborhood service (NS) use on the concept
plan, the following uses shall be permitted in
accordance with the detailed plans approved for
those tractst
Bakery or confectionery shop retail.
2-88-013/PAGE 3
cleaning and pressing small shop and pickup.
Custom personal service shop.
Drapery, needlework or weaving shop.
Florist or garden shop.
Handicraft shop.
Laundry or cleaning (self service).
Offices, professional and administrative.
Retail stores and shops (4,000 square feet or less).
Studio for photographer, musician, artist, or
health.
(e) community Facility. For any tract designated for a
community facility (CF) use on the concept plan, the
following uses shall be permitted in accordance with the
detailed plans approved for those tracts:
Art gallery or museum.
Cemetery.
Church, rectory, or institution of religious or
philanthropic nature.
Public or private school, college, or university.
Child care facility.
Hospital, nursing home, or residence home for aged.
Park, playground, or public community center
Public building for governmental use.
Other similar uses approved on detailed plan.
3. Park or School Sites. Tracts 12, 18, 20, 22, and 32,
designated for park or park and school sites on the concept
plan, shall each be respectively conveyed to the City, free
` and clear of all liens or encumbrances, upon approval of the
f first final plat approved for any tract of land included
within the particular phase of development in which the
designated park or park and school site is located, as shown
in the concept plan. A minimum of three contiguous acres
outside the 100-year floodplain shall be provided in both
Tracts 12 and 18 prior to conveyance.
Streets and Access. No building permil:s shall be issued
for any property located within the district until and unless
the bridge for Lakeview Boulevard, to be located immediately
south of the district and crossing Pecan Creek, has been
M completed. No direct vehicular access to Tracts 6 and 9 shall
l be provided or permitted from Trinity Road.
i S. Road Utility District. No road utility district shall be
created or utilized to fund the construction of any street
located within the planned development district herein
Z-88-013/PAGE 4
i
i
1
i
~ 1
defined.
That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas,
adopted~the1 V. day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code
of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under ordinance No. 69-
1, as amended, is further amended to show such change in the zoning _
district classification and use designation for the property
described in Section II of this ordinance.
SECTION VI• That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1988.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WAITERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA ADAMI DRAIOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
t.
f
E
E
i
f
Z-88-017/PAGE 5
i
J
EXHIBIT " A"
(1 of 8)
Fit 1,L) %40TES.
All Iliac certsiu leact or parcel sal IaoJ situated is Il,e hlureau Formal Saney
ALIIracl Nurnber 411 Denloa County, 'rc%as Nod bolo{ aU of a tract shows as Tract
1 by deed to 1lilii4m U. %%Ilion sad eccorJed Is Volomf 1763 Page 144 of the Real
Propertl Records of Utnlon Cuomll~ fetal and part of a tract shows by deed to
Leon Aimee And, recorded to Voiu,nt 1341 Pate 392 of rho Real Properly Records of
Uculon Coanly, Texas and being Inure rally described as follows:
Uttilanial for Ike southatrt corner of the tract being described herein al a half
lach robot pis found Is Mills flood, and trial the soolktest coreer of said WIlus
Traci 1;
Theact North 01 degrees 33 minutes 30 seconds fall passing at 447.14 feet a Peace
corset past on The sell list of said N'llsom Tract I. also being the soollkuel corsar
of a tract above by decd to Come A. Cowls mad recorded Is Volume 1372 Page $41
of the Resl' Peopotty Records of DtNloe Couaty, Texas toatissleg for a total
dlstanCe of 11606 feet to a half loch tabor pia sti is tk~ South Ilse of a tract
show Is by deed to Cary Miller. Trustee and recorded Is Volume 1617 Pals $62 of the
Real Property Records of Donlon Cowry, Ttaaa, said pie befog the sorshwal corner'
of said 11'F1sos Tract I led also being she Northeast Cotner of Said Cowls tract;
Thrace South 97 degrees 05 slimorts 56 seconds fill with a south list of.tetd MNltr
tract passive at 1136.44 feel the morthcatl career of said slilsos Trail 14atfaeiag
for a total distance of 1119.11 feel to a half lath robot pis sat on the anvils Ilea of
said hliiter tract, said pin being the moll ■orllscrly northeast eoeeor of Ibe hotels
dosceibtd tract also being the sorthwasl corner of a trail shown by deed to Jerry
stills and wife April Wells recorded Is Volume 1229 Pole I17 of The Neal Property
Records of Destos Cosatr, Texas.
These* South 02 degrees 21 minutes 31 socoeds West passing el 117.22 feel a 5/1
Inch rtbar pen forod of the southwest career of said Wells tract, rt" being the
northeast career of a tract shown to Jury Wills and wife recorded Is Vale" 1733
Page 761 of Ilse Real Property Records of Daotoe Cowry, Texas, paalag el 234.61
feel a S/9 lack rebar pea found of the aeo(hwatl Corner of said Wells trael,(Velome
1735 Palo 762), seat being the northwest eeratr of a iratl shorn by deed to Danny
Leos Mesta mad wife Martha Kiwis, as recorded Is Yolamo,Mll Page 111 of the
Real Properly Records, of DeMoo•Co sly, Texas, p sole{ al 302,91 fell it Ike
southwest cerver of said Waste tract (Velome 1906 Pitt 741) same befog Ike
northwest terser of a greet sbowu by deed In Joe R. Corse, of al, Trustee sad
recorded Is Velsme 1631 Page 477 of the Real Property Records of Deofos Ceoair,
Texas continuing for a total distance of 662.91 feel to a half lack robot pis sot so
the soslhutal cerate of said Cayae tract sod being so Poser ell Corner of ohs korofa
described Irxc4
I} Theses Snook 87 degrees 13 minutes 21 weeds East a distance of 267.74 fool to I
half lack fiber pis sat an the wotthsrst side of Trimily Road and said Miller lraN,
said pis being Iiho soolhesst corotr of Will Coyne 1'tact, also being the moil tasterly
aortheasl career of Ile heulo tfescr{bcd If act-.
These# South 43 dtgrttt 20 winmtea 21 secoodi Wul slth the e6rlhw4sl tide Of
TOO$) RusJ sod said Miller tract a dklooto 111643.14 (elf to a half Inch robot pie
,it. fur Iht souiliessl euratr of the herein described Iran,;
1'1610ct North 11 degrees 11 oiauits 47 teeoads caul passiut at 34134 felt Ike
soollitAil
thec Palms of Uegldnaialg and Conlalaiag 30.191 anfor I, usof total land~ktmeee of 941.31
(let i
-1-
Il
1
EXHIBIT "A"
( 2 of 8)
ZONING DESCRIPTION
EXISTING "AG" ZONING
PARCEL 1
Being a tract of land situated in the 4ireau Forrest Survey,
Abstract No. 417, Denton County, Texas and being a portion of the
Moreau Forrest Subdivision as shown in Volume 236, Page 50, County
Records, Denton County, Texas and being more particularly -
described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of a tract as shown by deed to
Tom Pr.- y Trustee, and recorded in Volume 1661, Page 415, said
County Records, said corner also being to Trinity Road (a public
right-of-way) and the northeast corner of Lot 13, Block A rf said
Moreau Forrest Subdivisicu;
THE NCR S 03' 20' 21" w, along the east line of said Prouty tract,
said Lot 13, Block A, a distance of $4.14 feet;
THENCE N 87' 16' 57" 47, a distance of 2831.30 feet to a point in
the west line of said Prouty tract and also the west line of Lot
12, Block A of said Moreau Forrest Subdivision;
THENCE N 02' 42' 45" E, along the west line of said Prouty tract
and the west line of said Lot 12, Block A, a distanca of 94.14
feet to a fence corner post for the northwest corner of said
Prouty tract, also being the northwest corner of said Lot 120
Block A and the southwest corner of said Lot 6, Block A;
THEWS S 87' 10' 50" E, along the north line of said Prouty tract
(Volume 1661, Page 415)9 the north line of said Lot 12, Block A,
and the south line of said Lot 60 Block A, a distance of 55.24
feet to a fence corner post, said fence corner post also being the
southwest corner of a tract sho,ra by deed to RMB Land Cospany, f
Ltd. a.1d recorded in Volume 1783, Page 780, of the Denton County
Real Property Records, and the southeast corner of the reminder
of a tract shown by deed to Ralph T. Bullard and record~.4 in
Volume 1521, Page 948 of the Denton County Real Property Records;
THENCE N 02' 49' 10" to along, the west line of said RMB tract, and f
the east line of the remainder of said Bullard tract, a distance F
of 923.60 feet to a found iron pin for the northwest corner of
said RMB tract, and in the south right-of-way lice of U.S. Rig'L:way
Number 3801
THE NCI N 81' 59' 26" E, ,long the north line of said RMB tract sod
the south line of said right-of-way, a distance of 163.16 feet to
a concrete monument for coraer;
C66 No. F187008001
10/03/8b
Page 1 of 2
PD12 A
-2-
1
EXHIBIT "A" (3 of 8)
THENCE N87' 27' 34" E, along the north line of said RHB tract and
the south line of said right-of-way, a distance of 100.06 feet to
a concrete monument for corner;
THENCE N 82' 05' 20" E, along the north line of said RMB tract and
the south line of said right-of-way, a distance of 415.73 feet to
a concrete monument for corner]
THENCE S 02' 57' 37" p, a distance of 100.20 feet to a found iron
pin for corner in the southern north line of said RMB tract;
THENCE S 86' 59' 42" E, along the north line of said RMB tract a
distance of 308.34 feet to a found iron pin;
THENCE S 86' 58' 11" E, along the north line of said RMB tract a
distance of 517.65 feet to a found iron pin;
THENCE S 81' 02' 30" E, along the north line of said RMB tract a
distance of 129.21 feet to a found iron pin;
THENCE S 86' 32' 52" E, along the north line of eLid RMB tract a
distance of 195.94 feet to a found iron pin;
THENCE S 87' 35' 38" E, along the north line of said RMB tract a
distance of 113.57 feet to a found iron pin;
THENCE S 86' 49' 13" E, along the north line of said RMB tract a
distance of 315.97 feet to i found iron pia;
f THENCE S 87' 14' 43" E, along the north line of said RMB tract
distance of 100.75 feet to a found iron pin;
THENCE S 86' 46' 40" E, along the north line of said PHB tract a
distance of 320.56 feet to a found iron pin, said iron pin also
being the northeast corner of said RMB tract, and in the west
tight-of-way line of Trinity Road;
THENCE S 02' 35' 45" si, along the east line of said RMB tract, and
the west line of said Trinity Road, a distance of 930.72 feet to a
found iron pin;
1
THENCE S 67' 23' 14" E, a distance of 24.15 feet to the POINT Of
BEGIVNING and containing 66'.039 acres of land, more or leas.
THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS FOR ZONING PURPOSES ONLY.
.I
C&B No. 7181008001
10/03/88 it
page 2 of 2
PD12 .B
-3-
EXHIBIT "A" (4 of 8)
ZONING DESCRIPTION
EXISTING "AG" ZONING
PARCEL 2
Being a tract of land situated in the Moreau Forrest Survey,
Abstract No. 417, Denton County, Texas and being a portion of the
Moreau Forrest Subdivision as shown in volume 236, Page 50, County
Recorde, Denton County, Texas and being more particularly
described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at an Army Corprs of Engineers Monument Q-313-W for the
north corner of a tract shown by deed to Tom Prouty, Trustee and
recorded in Volume 1755, Page 495, said County Records, and also
being in the eastern most line of Miller tract (Volume 1677, Page
562) and in the east line of Lot 5, Block E of Moreau Forrest
Subdivision;
THENCE S 23' 25' 50" E, departing the east line of said Lot 5,
Block E, and along a west line of said Carve-Little Elm Reservoir,
a distance of 490.89 feet to s found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-312-W, for the east corner of said Prouty tract (Volume
1755, Page 495);
THENCE S 34' 06' 54" W, along a west line of said Carta-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 269.93 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-311-W, said monument also being the northeast
corner of a tract shown by deed to Tom Prouty, Trustee, as
recorded in Volume 1710, Page 404, of the Denton County Real
Property Records;
THENCE S 33' O1' 16" E, along the east line of said Prouty tract
(Volume 1770, Page 404) and a west line of said Carta-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 281.65 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-310-W, for the northernmost southeast corner
of raid Prouty tract (Volume 1770, Page 404);
THENCE S 00' 35' 13' W, a distance of 12.77 feet to tLe southern
southeast corner of said Prouty tract, same being the easternmost
northeast corner of a tract show by dead to Cary Miller, Trustee
and recorded in Volume 1654, Page 2321 said County Records;
THENCE N 81' 11' 19" W, a distance of 181.91 feet to the southwest
corner of a tract as show by deed to White an3 recorded in Volume
595, Page 571, said County Records;
THENCE N 05' 23' 05" E, a distance of 241.94 feet to the northwest
corner of said White tract;
C68 No. P187008001
10/03/88
Page 1 of 2
PD12 -C
-4-
I
N
EXHIBIT "A" (5 of 8)
' THENCE N 84' 43' 51" W, a distance of 40 24 feet to the most
northerly northwest corner of a tract as shown by deed to Nueces
News Agency, Inc. and recorded in Volume 1103, Page 3511 said
County Recordsl
THENCE S 02' 45' 30" W, a distance of 264.28 feet to the northwest
corner of a tract as shown by deed to Moorman and recorded in
Volume 345, Page 305, said County Records]
I THENCE N 88' 44' 11" E, a distance of 61.11 feet to the northeast
corner of said Moorman tracts _
THENCE S 02' 45' 35" W, a distance of 60.06 feet to the southeast
corner of said Moorman tractl
THENCE N 89' 50' 51" W, a distance of 59.76 feet to the southwest
E corder of said Moorman tract]
I THENCE S 02' 06' 20" W, a distance of 335.65 feet]
THENCE N 87' 35' 55" W, a distance of 31.27 feet]
THENCE N 87' 35' 07" W, a distance of 1166.94 feet along the
center of abandoned Hills Road to the westerly northwest corner of
said Nueces News Agency tract;
THENCE 8 86' 32' 30" W, a distance of 197.97 feet;
THENCE N 86' 33' 38" W, a distance cl 1243.26 fasts
THENCE N 02' 42' 29" E, a distance of 27.42 feet to a point in
the west sight-of-way line of Trinity Road, same S4ing the most
southerly southwest corner of Gary Miller tract as recorded in
Volume 16771 Pags 562, said County Recordsl
THENCE S 87' 17' 31" E, a distance of 2606.96 feet to the west
southerly southeast corner of said Cary Hiller tracts
THENCE N 02' 34' 03" E, a distance of 1312.95 feat along the most
southerly east line of said Cary Miller tract to the POINT 08
BEGINNING and containing 4.241 acres of land, more or less.
E
THIS DESCRIPTION I8 FOR 20N1N0 PLAPOSES ONLY.
08 No. 1181008001
10/03/88
Page 2 a ' 2
PD12 .D
y
-5-
Vmpv~
EXHIBIT "A"
(.6 of 8)
D[f Al
LEGAL
rIA r '
tEIMG A PORTION OF LOT 40. 6 IN CLOCK "I" Of THE SUIOIVISION Of THE RORAEAU FORREST LOAIUI 4 LAIOR AS ACCORDED
IN MOWAt $0. PAGI 216, DIED RECORDS, DEMtON COUNTY, MAS AMD 111111 A PORTION Of THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND
,1101
MNtrT
AS Of $A
11 41% S,I S1( 6 AID E TRACT O 01 0LAMIJ ND ICING MORE P ATICU1LAILYl01SCA$1[0 IA NflitORAN/ t"I Al FOLLOVSJ 111, $A10 OtLD
RECORD
COAPE"CIRO AT A 1/1 INCA IRON 400 FOUND I FIST AGAIN 01 AN 1XISTINA fENCE CORNER, TMI NOATHVESI COAIIR 01 SA10
,NCNttT TRACT, SAID IAON 41IN0 IN TML 100THULY LIME OF OLA44 11641 , OP
ITY S6J.)S /fit•701A 5/1 INCALIRONSR00 AND0169THE OF IEGINNING4OF INC TRACT,
MIAEIN oCSC411to TRACT 11 '
1111-6) Ftit • T0 1 A 0Sig 6" COmT11WING N UA00 VITNOCAFISTIOWTH CRATENE101UAGESI'ROAD AMD THE NORTHEKLY LINE Of ACMITT TRACT,
TME
TNENCI S 01' N6' SA" W' LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE CF SAID ILA44 ROAD AN THE NOKTMEAIY LINE OF SAID HCNETT TRACT,
165.46 Fitt To A 5/1 INCH IRON ROD WITH CO STAMED "CAATIK S IURCESS" SITE
tNEACE A 11. 10' 03" V, )14.42 FCIT 10 A Sit INCH IRON 900 WITH CM STAMPED "CARTIA 6 WAOESS" Sit$
THtNCt N 03' 401 S4" E, 111'46 FEET 10 THE POINT of /EGIMI AAD COMTAININC 1,000 ACAI Al LAND, MORE OA L911-
TRACT
191110 A PJATION Of LOT 40, 6 IM ILOCK "I" Of THt SUIoIVISION 01 THE MOAAEAU FOREST LIAM 6 LA04A At RICORC90 IN
VOLUAII $0, FAGS US, OECD ACCORDS, DENTON COUNT(, ?[US AN1 ICING A P04110K OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AS
DESCA1110 IY OECD t0 MURRAY V. ACNETT AND WIFE, ISM MCNETT ANo AtL090t0 IN VOLUNI 416, PAGE 121, SAID 0110
ASCORDS, SAID TRACT OF LAND 111NG MORE PMTIWLAIILY 011941111 It METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOVSs
` 1IGi9,A RIA,IA011/2 INCH FSOUTHIRFlit LINE I01 Ail LA 6 ROASTING FENCE CORNEA, THE NOATHVEST CORNEA Of $AID MCNETT
C134' 111 06"1, VITH ICNORTHERLY L11111 of SAID MCNETT TRACT AND THE SOUTHEALY LINE 01 OLA90 ROAD, S10.119
Fill 10 A INCH IRON ROD SIT3
ImIMCI 110 3' Nil SSWI /I 'a,tE IRON O AT HE Wit" MCAP IAL STLIEO 1 S A M A t N 1UAG1TRACT 1L1 TAE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID ILA" ROAD,
tHIPM 1 42' 10' 01" t, 114,42 FEET TO A 5/I INCH 140M ROD VIIN CM 47411110 "CARTER I k MP SETT
tAINCI ROOM- 14" 1, 1145.46 Fitt TO A S/6 INCH IRON 100 WITH CM STAAPIO "CARTER 6 11MISS" 1ET IN THE NDSTMIALV
L!M1 Of SAID MCNITf TRACT AND THE SOUIMIALY-LINE OF ILAGA AOAOi
TNINCE 1 IN 11' 06" 1, ALONG TMI MINIM I111I Of SAID MCNETT TMtt AND THE SMINtAr~~l~i~I LO I`
ILO 4 ROAD,
N
A
501 )I Fill TO N 1/1 INCH IRON 400 IOUH/ IM TRINITY ROAD 10 1Mt IAtTI LT llt Of THE
CR "1" OOf 4011 SUIOIVISIOM 1gRRIAU IOMST lEAOUI I LAEOA NO ItNN INC N0111M1A1f ODNMIN Of SAID YCNITT 144971
P`W1 S 00 IS' 014 N ALONG TMI CAltIRLY LINE OF 'SAIO LOT I (LOCK "D"AND ALM THE 1"ALY LINE of 110 11901111
, IECf TO A III INCA IRON NO 1041010, INS IOUTH1ASf WAR v PAD LOT 6, ILOCR / A0 THE tGYT11lAIT
TRACT, 1214 N,
CORNER of Su0 019191? TAACTI
THtN+.1 N 1162!,414 V, ALONG INC IOYITHERLY LINE Of SAID LOT 11 KOCR W AND A~KJMJ ~RL" SANI~tt IS Aim tAACt, 1314.74 11111 TO A V1 INCH DON 400 (01010,
INC DDUfKwaT DOWN OF TAO to 1,
01 SAID MChill IRMO
!AtNCt 44 10' or it ALONG INS VISTIRIT LINT OF SAID 101 4 ILOCA '7" AM AWN THE MI6TINLT IN 01 TAO t1C11tTT
TACT, 114 41111 t0 1(111 PONT OF UNIONS Alt CMIAM4 70.711 ACM Of LANO,110A1 ON Lt16.
-6-
I
I
EXHIBIT "A" (7 of 8)
LAKEVIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
ZONING DESCIIPT104
PARCEL 3
Be1nq a tract of land sitwted in the W. 0. Durham Survey, Abstract No.
330, Denton County, Texas, and being a Portion of the Moreau Forrest
Subdirislon a$ shown In Volume 236, Page 50, County Records, Canton
County, Texas, and bN ng more particularly described by metes and bounds
as follower
Beginning at an iron pin found in the existing norOvist
right-of-way line of Fare-to-Market Road No. 126, also known As McKinney
Street, said iron pin alto being t'„e northwestern Ifni of Lot d, block
Q, Vacation Village No. S (Advised) at shown on record fn Volume 12,
Page 19, of said Orton County Plat Records;
Themes S 160 29' 60' W, A distance of 100,13 feet to a point in the
existing south riot-of-way lime of said Fare-to-Marktt pond No. 4241
Thence S 010 60' 17" Y, along the east lint of Tom Prouty, Trustee,
tract as recorded in Vol we 1570, Page 329, and the west 11ne of a tract
shorn by deed to BUckwell Estate And recorded in Valwo 1117, Page 510,
Denton County Deed Records, a distance of 13.12 feet to a point;
Thence N 170 30' 10" W, a distance of 1352,30 foot to a point in
the vast line of said Prouty tract IVoI we 1570, Pago 3251, and the east
line of a tract Shown by deed to L. L. Farris and recorded In Volume
253, Page 309, Denton Cowty Dead Records)
Thence N 030 50' 25' t, along the west Ifni of ssfd Prouty tract
and the test tine of told Farris tract, a distance of 25.61 feet to a
point in the south lint of Faroe-to-Market Road No, 126, also knows is
MCKinney Street;
Thence W 120 51' 09' W, a distance of 137.12 feet to a point in the
northern right-of-way line of Faroe-td-Market Road No. 126, told point
also being on the south line of a tract shown by ±ded to A. I.. Vwghn
and recorded in Vol we IN, Pole 691, Denton County Deed Records;
I
(
f
EXHIBIT "A" l 8 of 81
Thence N 030 12' S1' t, along the wilt line of said Prouty tract
and the asst line of sold Vaughn tract, a distance of 21.95 felt to a
pofntt 04 1
Thence S 410 38' 18' E, a distance of 1495.35 flat to a point In
the east lima of said Prouty tract and the west line of sold Vacation
Village No. S;
Thence S 120 52' 18' 11, along the east line 01 said Prouty tract
end the wilt lime of said Vacation Village M. a dlstsnce of 9.80
feet to the POINT OF 8EOINNINq and containing 3.912 acres of lend, more
or lass.
tog 1 description excludes 0.53 ac. for Trinity Road and 0.21 ac.
for Elagq Aoad.
f
l k
li f
}
THE ABOVE W AL DESCRIPTION IS FOR 20x1014 PII01POSES ONLY.
i
t
.
f ,
i
EXHIBIT "B"
CONCEPT PLAN FOR LAKEVIEW, CONSISTING OF:
1. Conceptual Site Plan (2 pages);
2. Development Standards (4 pages);
3. Summary of Zoning Kestrictions (6 pages);
4. Phasing Schedules (23 pages); and
5. Utility Exhibit (1 page).
I
I
ti
I
a
I
i
i
Z-88-013 i
r
NIO YM wMMNV ~
~y1ty~Np ~ t
a'x '1 ~ rl
r - .~r •Ir
~ ~ - - • µ1..u/
nw _ . J 4I V
- i~
r..
i
z11
~~1 ~fW, Ml~~
W ••rt~Mn•IY nom'
.w 1. n.~nw Iw r.w r•NI 1
L
~Y, 111
U.S
ri
OR M► LI
b U& r•
OH/., I 1 LI9
M/ M•
Li ~i i ~►-f
S►-A . 11
add 4&1
f
NO
~a
T
CL-I ►IUIK
N? 1! h~
N
il•A !1
11 $F.7 204 NS
as ►ARK If
CL-4
Mf !1 ii1Y
` SCN1/ARK .ea ,
f PARK 8r-lo
M4b ;
!1' 4e
s►•fo as
CL-,
W4
PARK
u-A . 40
w1 1 CL-1 I
an
M• M
7 1 OFF
OFF
LAKEVIlW PLANNLO O&VILOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
CONCEPT PLAN
07-01-88
1. Statement of Intent of Owners Lakeview Planned Development (PD) Is a proposed mixed
use development w/ccmmercial, office, residential, light industrial 6 open apace land
uses. The development concept is in response to: the physical relationship of the
site to Lake Lewisville; compatibility d diversity of land usess providing community
housing, employment 3 com_mercial_activity: balance of transportation system w/lend
_r!es; public safety w/improved access b circulation; providing improved water 6 sani-
tary sewer systems 6 maintaining open apace greenbelts as well as providing park 6
school facilities for the region.
2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guides
Lakeview Planned Development (PD) proposes a reduction in dendity from the previousl)
approved Lakeview PD. The intention of this project is a quality development for
Denton in accordance with the Denton Development Guide.
3, Total Number of Acres in Proposed Districts
$67.8 acres
4. Lend Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcal or Tracts
Total Proposed Acreage
a. Single Faintly Detached 397.8
b. Single family Attached (townhouses, cluster, etc.) 152.5
co Attached Patio/Garden/2ero Lot Line
d. Duplex -
of Multi-family 59.8 _
is office 18.2
g. Neighborhood service 12.0
h, General Retail 49.7
1. Commercial
Light Industrial X5.8
M, Heavy Industrial f
16 Other (specify) a School 6 Parke 30.2
e Park 34.3
e Community Facility 10.0
e Major ROW 5015
e Collector ROW 17.0
TOTAL 867.8 Acres
{
Development Standards
Page 2
5. Off-Site Information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed tmprovemente.
(shown on concept or detailed plan.)
60 Traffic and Transportation - indicats existing and proposed stroeta, parking lots,
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Projected Traffic ClnaratIon. (Based on traffic study, if required.)
Refer to traffic study report (1-19-88) submitted with Lakeview PD
7. Buildings
a. Approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
b. Maximum height:
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
c. Minimum setbacksi (shown on concept or detailed plan.) -
Shown in Summary of Zoning Restrictions
w
d. Maximum groae floor area (square feet) for nonresidentiali
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
8. Residential Subdivision:
e. Number of unil-a per acne (deneity)s
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
i
b. Number and location of lots (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
To be shown on detail clan
c. Minimum size, width and depth of lotas (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Shown in P.D. Zoning Restriction Summery _
)
do minimum front, side and rear yard setbacks (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Shown in P.D. Zoning Restriction Summary_
1
Development Standards
pace 3
g, water and Drainage ' approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks,
[loodplainsr other Water uli retention or major drainage facilities
ponds, loxes. t"y plan.)
~
and Lmprovements. (Shown on
10, utilities - location of all major sewacr water or electrical line+ and facilities.
)
(Shown on conceptux M:L4*plan.
six 16) feet from ground level.
Snn. _
11~ Location of trees O 30 In diameter he
plan.) Tra• masses are shown on t concept p
plan review arid
(Shown on concept
Detail tree location is requested to be waived `k ilc eau~on and recreational areas.
approval process. reenbeltar P
11. Open Space - location and site I 9
plan.)
(Shown on concept a~ ten e
The locations of ma or arks and iminaS3!„Wr„Qand detail ~ _
Further detail will be shown at the time of orel.p
review ar.d approval.
location, type and sl:• of all teneaar beds or screening features.
li. Screening ' w* plan.) -
(Showr, on concept axxdx~ Qt83aG-b~---
Not applicable at this time. it iA
waived until datail lan
Ian) - showing specific date detailed plan will
11, Development Schedule (concept P and cote of
be submitted# data I start conseeuction and compleenrcoratcuct on,
develoµsentr All dates should indicate month and y
So, attachment Eoc Develo went Schedule
1
ADDITIONAL REOUIRtIQITtB jolt A DETAILED PLAN
- features and types of landscaping to be used.
1S. Landscaping Plan major cane arshiLSCSfat01
is re nested that detail~+~----
` Not a licable at this time.
L
{ s
`r
f '
i
I
1 /
Development Standards
page 1
16. Signs - show location, type and size on detailed plant otherwise, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Not a ((cable at this time. An on- remise si ns not in conformance with
Article 17 will be described on detailed site plan as to location, size ..:d type.
17. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.) Not applicable at this time. It is requested
that sidewalk locations be waived until detail site plan review.
10, All information required for preliminary plat In accordance with Appendix A
(Denton Development Code) of the Code of ordinances.
(A separate plat is required.)
1g. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rate of development, Al. dates should indicate month
and year.
See attached schedule Additional Schedule information will be subta tteA in
conjunction with detail plan and preliminary plat approval,
I
I
I
1
ab
3/07
711188 ( Revised 10-13-88 )
SUMMARY OF ZONING RESTRICTIONS - LAKEVIEW
114 Os471 LRRT1 MALI TOTAL
Ca1ACT WT MK LANG AREA TYPKAL 110 MK 110 MAK 6ULDH0 AAA HT. MAk MN . MN 10E fEM iv PARIq [;($s
i 0E"ATION AO*E6 PER UYt LOT 110 DEPM WIDTH COVERAGE 61D0 117CRE® FAR. f110NT YARD YATp .U p PACE
am FT. YARD ►ISf. N FA AOKACRE D.U
61M.E FAAIY-IC 1741 Mm if. 101 126 120 t0 31% NA ! NA 30 10% IO ENCIONE NA 32 64F !t 4.111
ON" FAMILY-7 111.6 7000 6f. sox 116 100 10 M% PIA 3 NA 26 10% 10 1 ENOLOSW NA lA 111 3.0 2,116
i
MA 20 10' MN 1C EN141
i FAM4.Y Att $4.4 6000 1f. 60 t 100 100 60 110% 14A E
EPAAA 6.4 11 Ill !1 4.761
CI01E0
tYU6T611 HOP,p,I 61.1 NA NA NA NA 66% NA 11 NA 60 EPAM 10 E10C1061D 6.1 . • 116 !.F %116 i
3
j LAATHAMIY 61.6 NA NA NA NA 40% NA 1 NA 60 10' 1661 10 1.16 - 6.1 t6 1,111 !6 t,71•
I
Sa
4 OPPI01 11.1 NA NA NA NA 4" 161,666 1 061 10 NA so law Mr. NA ILA NA NAMA
1
i NDOre0g100o
I 16.6 tU1 NA NA IW as 419.116 6 0t0 !0 10 10 vt006f. NA NA NA IIN NA
004111AL MAL 16.1 NA NA NA NA 10% ,761,94 1 1A 74 NA 10 14.10011. NA NA NA NA NA
Loa OUNIMAL 11.1 NA HA NA NA 40% .147.66 ! t1 10 NA 10 1/ low U. NA NA PIA NA NA
COMMUNITY
IIA NA NA
PACILI7111 N1.6 NA NA NA kA 40% 621,116 1 14 10 NA 10 1/200 S.F. NA EkA
1CNOOLI►AR9 11.1
NA NA NA NA ,
NA NA
PARK 111.6 NA NA MA NA 'NA NA NA NA 222.6 NA
MAJOR R.O.W. 61.6 NA NA NA NA NA PM NA NA NA NA NA NA NA HA NA NA NA
I
COLLECTOR ILO.W. 17.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 141 NA NA MA 14A W
TOTALI 111.6 r^
64.6 1,61 1l,g1
T
• 1N.IYry flsMral 1 OnM OsMSwIM GMs fsl INlsNS Asllrls Camas N IN trips M t* 1 Ow WOW. IN LA. NM/II Amt we /11111 M Err I Fm 1er1~P1; III PI,IwIIMMs urtr MWA N M MM to Mrt%" trtrb
f
j r 1
I
1
i
I
N
~ I
Hop
Pmt.
` A^R
4AP
3 uv. LIV
rrN, ~.AR• O K
l ii
K. ylv $ k, DR; 1400 ppR
60
k, N~
Pit
CA
I•N K 7.5
l1Mt !~q r, ~
K
M. NY ® Mv
i
30'B.
, -10' AA
/rte//
1
f
SF- 10 TYPICAL LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
sc; N.r,. GARTER & SURGESS ING
ENGINEERS s /l.W~lIRS
IiYrK.M1eW~~/~ wswn.aM.11Ll1.1
I
r ~
,
• ~ I
1 l a'
Kr ~L'r
Hai
P^T
i+K
2511.
. . 4A~ awe
MIA. GMr G ie 749-
3 w. ~.iv
14KK
w
K. $ Kr M; MIR I
Lh/
AA R. J • 70~. .
MISR
14
„iA Guy ^ K sll
® K K
8A, ~ IIV
&An
ars
SF-7 TYPICAL LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
aCALM N.T.S. Ef~VG NIMS 6RPIM R
iiw~rnrrr,r ~ wewn oar« nw ni,r
Iv
i
I
I
i .
• m 10' SIDEYARD AND
N! MAINTENANCE EASEMENT (TYPICAL)
era, raci bv'
i ~ P..T, LJV. • 3 1, _ t Zs I d L,
0
1 ~ tl!
, ~ K. Lld. ~ • ( K. Y, MNt.
' Mme.
I
J~
ha. uv. ~I~f, ' .fl AR "
.
~ ~7, ~ K • lJY
I
Li L,IV; 6AR, OMIT,
1 _ ZsI
w~..
I c9' n•'r. I .
1
SFm5 TYPICAL ZERO LOT LINE-LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
GARTER A BURGESSA~NC.
SCALE- H.T.S. ENGINEERS • FLANNERS
h
- r 100' ;
Elll8T PAMc 10 O
--4 $
PEN GREE
L4
L w
r
EASEMENT 114' PAVING
a 8T PARKING
PEN QREE MN M!E
- o:
WAIT PARK
,00'
ea R.aw.
SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS AWINC.
` SCALE: N.T.S. If i ~«wew~w+~ ~ w wxn w~~r. n w xn~
I
i
1
i
I
i
I
I
r
I R
1101R
m
II~ b
O r Nf ~
IN
O~L
n 40, 40'
z .
a
a ti
r r4 N OA$ ~
4' WALK 0 EST PARKING
J
30
r 2070.E _ 40 101R
N ~ ~ I
.
PATIO HOME CLUSTER LAYOUT MILLER of TEXAS
SCALE. N.T.B, ? CARTER & kJlCmM INC.
ENGINEERS • KmAm
n•~ytM ~+M1Ur • wan,n •arr nwnu~
r
I
LAKEVIEW ADDITION
` SUBMITTAL/REVIEW SCHEDULE
1 .
` Submittal to the City of Denton for
f Consideration by Planning 6 zoning
Commission and Cit Council
Transportation Improvements
Plan March 1989
P.D. District Detail Concept
Plan March 1989
Utility/Drainage Improvements
Plan March 1989
Phase 1 (1IIA) - Detail
Plan/Preliminary Plat June 1994
Phase 2 (1119) - Detail
Plan/Preliminary Plat March 1995
Phase 3 (IVA) - Detail
Plan/Preliminary Plat September 1996
Phase 4 (IVB) - Detail
Plan/Preliminary Plat March 1998
i
V
;
I
{
i
i
! RECEIVED
J UL 22 198
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT I
DEPARTMENT f
Cd8 No. P181008001
i
1
LAKEVIEW ADDITION
DEVELOPMENT PHASING SCHEDULE
% of
Phase Acreage sage Tracts Pro
ject Submittal/Review Site Plan Development
I
(111A) 98.5 32 thru 41 12 June 1994 Sept. 1995
2
(IIIB) 150.2 27 thru 31 19 March 1995 June 1996
3
(TVA) 246.4 1 thru 11 6 31 Sept. 1996 Dec. 1997
18 thru 23
4
(IVB) 305.2 12 thru 17 d 38 March 1998 June 1999Y~
24 thru 26
800.3 Acres
-t
RECEIVED
JUL 22 0
PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT E
I
cat; No. F181008001
k.
j.
ROAD PHASING SCHEDULE
o PHASE IA
TRACTS - 11, 11, 13, 141 16, 17
(moo Figures S and 6)
Build Lakeview Blvd. as a two-lane roadway
from J.H. 7SE to meadowlark
Provide ■ignalisation at$
Lakeview and I.H. 36E Southbound Service Rd
Lakeview and I.H. 39E Northbound Service Rd
Lakeview and Shady Shores
NOT29 A connection between the Southview Developuent and
Mead
uuntilowMeadowlarlark niseimproved to aadrivG6lilstandard.made
i
I
3
1
a
f
1
f
E
t
f
l
i
i I
PICAK C81IK
.
N COLOKA00 ILVO.
I
i
I I 3 14
12
16 9
i
17
LWEND:
FIGURE !s
Developmental Phselnq PhUI IA
Phase IA t~
• Southvlew Development ®Othw Pha111
I
T
r~
wwr. ~~o
Samoa am"aaaa
a ;
LAK!
LE WISVILLE
MCKINNE MLLS
mom"
.r y.
~ I
I t!
OOUAM*
.
tis
• i
LEGEND:
! kJ'~ i31
Sl~s~l t
Muor s»o~ei t
FIGURE d n E
Dwalopmontal Phasing
L~J
Ph@" I A
Improvements
• PHASE IS
TRACTS - 6i 7, 8o 9, 100 15
(see Figures 7 and S)
- Build Lakeview Boulevard as a four-lane,
divided roadway from I.H. 35E to the
northern boundary of Tracts 5 and 7
NOTES Colorado Will be built as a minimum of two lanes from
Lakeview o to Tract 7
.
I~I
f
i
F
1
t
i
►fCAK C~fLK
COLOIIADO fLVO.
6
10 q $
15
I~►
k
FIGURE 7 LEOENa
DwO1OPm$ntai Phasing ❑ Phan to
Ph@$* 10 ® pdW PhUN
Southview DwO1OPmfnt
I
HWY. S10
s
rr!
t
rL,ao
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
ue K iNME r MALL II
M04 ♦r
OOl0AA0p
t
Ott,
5t.
LEGEND: ; f'tt
AoEd troprowaeEt
,t
E
"Nos
i
Sl~ 8
Developmental Phasing
Phw
Improvements
"OUR
i
i
• PHASE II
TRACTS - 1, 2, 3, 41 5
` (!•e Figures 9 and 10)
Il Extend Lakeview Boulevard as a four-lane,
divided roadway from Tract 5 and 7 to
Pecan Creek
- Build Meadowlark as a tour-lane, divided
roadway from Lakeview Boulevard to I.H. 35E
- Construct right-turn lanes ati
Lakeview and Meadowlark, westbound to
northbound
Lakeview and I.H. 35E Northbound Service
Road, southwestbound to northwestbound
- Construct left-turn lanes at:
Lakeview and X.H. 359 southbound service
Road, southeastbound to northeastbound
Widen I.H. 35E overpass at Lakeview Boulevard
to 5 lanes
1
( f
I
3
~ j
1
t
t! . f
I
i
N ►LCI.K CRltK
2
3
l 4
coLoPIAoo 800. 5
N
Asp.-
FIGURE! Cl pew It
D•vtoPm•ntol Pho~^s ®OtbK pe.w
PhW 11
southvl•w Oovlop+~•nt
MAI sto
at A40
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
VCSIMNEY M.LS
t
NOKse
coLONAOO ' I
'tfj. i
LEGEND:
Road Improvemeat 4'4++~~ i 1
Tl Tura Liza*
904V >1
FIGURE 10
• i
Dovolopmontal Phasing
• phs" II r• i
Improvomonf• 'I
I
1
I
I
s Build the bridge over Pecan crook
• PHASE IIIA
TRACTS - 32, 330 34, 33, 361 370 38, 39, 40, 41
(see Figures 11 and 12)
- Extend and widen Lakeview to ■ix-lanes from
I.N. 36E to the northern end of Tract 33
Provide signalization ati
Lakeview and Colorado
Construct right-turn lanes ati
Lakeview and McKinney, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and I.N. 35E northbound service
Road, northwestbound to northeastbound
construct left-turn lanes ati
Lakeview and McKinney, northbound to
wastbound
widen I.N. 362 overpass at Lakeview Boulevard
to 7 lane,
NOTES McKinney Street (F.M. 426) is assumed to be built to
the designated thoroughfare standard of four lanes, divided.
NOTES signalization and widening to a five lane section of -
Meadowlark Road at i.H. 35E is assumed.
1
f
f
~ i
r
'1
H~r >>0
&%.A00
15
23
18
miuS
19
22/ -
coor~~
28' c""X
30
32
31
36
OVA/
38
37/ 40
39 41
HCAN CAM AKavuw LWEND:
I1Y0.
Ph&" MA
FIGURE 11
Davalopmantal Phaalnp ®pchet Phan
phase ILIA
• Lakavlaw DavaloPmo"t ,
Mwr. sia
It AGO
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
4e KINNlr
IYYIM ~
i ~
i
,
j
w •
~i
~L'
001
ooLaAOO ,'`i
I
LeotaND,
,t
Read faowaal. ttist
1
~l rota L4&0 f4J~ 411 si~!
SI asaf r
r`''" ~'',I'•:
addle
FIGURE 12
D*vNopmental Phadnq
Phase III A
Improvements
J
e~ PHASE IIIB
TRACTS - 270 28, 29, 30, 31
(see Fiqures 13 and 14)
Extend Lakeview Boulevard from Tract 33 to
',Tact 22 as a six-lane, divided roadway
Construct right-turn lanes ats
Loop 288 Bypass and I.H. 38E Northbound
Service Rd, southbound to northwest-
bound
Lcop 288 Bypass and I.H. 35E Southbound
Service Rd, northbound to southeast-
bound
i
i
{
1
F
E
• a
I
~I
i
I~ ~
Hwr.Ijo
ILAGG
Ib
23
18
MILLI
19
10
22/ 2$'
27 CCIGIffK
34 29
32
31
36
Af•KiMW 3 38
37/
40
39 41
PICAN CASIK
/KlYli1N LB08NR
FIGURE 13 Mc.
Developmental Phasing ❑ PMU Iite
Phase HIS ®O(hW Ph&M
• Lakeview Development
I '
NWM.
. ~ I
ILAOO
i . ` _ ~ III
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
McM IN NE 1 YLl!
MOON
COLOAAN
i
LEOE N D 41
Road ImptovE1118E1
h Tura Laos
Ewav SMoRE~
FIGURE 14
Developmental Phasing
phase 111 S
Improvements
r
l
s Build the bridge over Cooper Creak
e P3ASE IVA
TRACTS - It 2, 31 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 110 18,
19, 20, 211 22, 23
(Sae Figures 15 and 16) _
- Extend Lakeview a■ a six-lane, divided
roadway from Tract 22 to U.S. 380
-
Provide signalization ate
Mayhill and 81agg
j Mayhill and Mills
II Lakeview and el;gq
Lakeview and Mills
Lakeview and F.M. 426
Construct right-turn lanes ate
Lakeview and U.S. 380, eastbound to
k southbound
Lakeview and McKinney, southbound to
wastbound
Lakeview and Colorado, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and Meadowlark, westbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Shady Shores, southbound to
westbound
Construct left-turn lanes ate
Lakeview and U.S. 3800 westbound to
southbound
Lakeview and McKinney, eastbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Colorado, eastbound to
i northbound
Lakeview and Meadowlark, southbound to
eastboc ld
NOTES McKinney Street and Mayhill Road are assumed to be
built to their designated thoroughfare standards.
NOTES Mills Road and Slagq Road are assumed to be driveable.
Future study may be required if they are not in an acceptable
t state for motor vehicle use.
1
10 'je 1 4 5 6
8 9
'3y i1
t1A00
15
23
18 20
WILL- . _ 2
l9~
22/
28' eooPu
cettx
I
i 30
32
31
36
` yk,Mh33~ 3
$
37~
40
39
PICAN CAM 41
Axtvlaw LEGEND
two.
FIGURE id ❑ Phaae IVA
Devolopmfntal Phaoing
Pha$$ IVA Other Pham
Lakovltlw Development
i
i
1
r
Nwr. pia 1
GLAc4
~ 3o a
/ LAKE
LEWISVILLE
Me RfgNaY 4SLLS
i
~M w4
00
OOLMAM
r
y
LEGEND:
Road Improvamaar
h Tura Lao.
Sl/oal ~uor~a
BNOIa
FIGURE 16
Developmental Phasing
Phase IV A
` Improvements
• PHASE IVB
TRACTS - 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 24, 25, 26 and
all remaining tracts
(sae Figures 17 and 18)
Construct right-turn lanes ate
+Mayhill and McKinney, northbound to
eastbound, southbound to westbound
Loop 288 and I.H. 35E Northbound
Service Rd, northwestbound to
northeastbound
Construct left-turn lane at:
+Mayhill and McKinney, westbound to
southbound
NOTE: If the bridge across I.H. 35E is not widened, then
additional studies should b4 submitted prior to advancing in
the sequencing scheme.
NOTE= If Loop 288 Bypass is not built, there would not be any
major impact on the transportation system caused by the
Southview and Lakeview developments.
Prior to the development of each tract of land, a detailed
plan, meeting the raquirements of Article 11 of Appendix B-
Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, shall be submitted for City
council approval, after recommendation is made thereon by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. Concurrent with the
submission of the first such detailed plan, a Transportation
Improvement Plan addressing these specific traffic
improvements necessary to serve this entire phase of
development, without altering the'improvements associated
with Lakeview Boulevard, shall also be submitted and
approved.
101- >>4
ELA00
13 2
l5
16 14 23
17 \.4
17 4
18, 25 t,
MALE 26
19
22/
COOLER
28/ CR!!K
30
a
32
31
36
33/ 38
37/ 40
PECAN CREEK 39 AKlYIlM 41 LEGEND-
Iwo. ❑ PhM SVB
FIGURE 17 00dw Mai
Developmental Phasing
Phase IV9
Loksalew Dsvelopment
Nwr. ~w
aLA00
3
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
wCRINwr * wtS
r
I
LEGEND. . v
4 ~
Tura Lane
To be Determined Later
i
64W O"s
FIGURE to
D*vNopm*ntil PhaMng
Phm IV S
` Improvements
NI- ~ Yr•
IA
~ L'Y4
p~ yw .
b n
• V bu
,t
e
16
rr.
..a .s.l : r.
,R
J r y,t
~ f
n
M
00
i I-
.rrr • ,
e
Ott ri~r~i~w. a r~~
.
NVTt.Ml1~T ■ali
L.AKEVIEW
rtaw.: ,Kr 4 n.a
~M Y14r.. Y t.nY. t4Yltlr. M
wwtr n. 4.w rwtY rs Y.cv nr. r
t.r rrn trr~r ~t tr a rtrf
+r +,~w n.u NM qrr wsn. n.u n.r
Ci.,
\1'II t,F Mtt It w.M Yw
i
MciTROPLEX ENGINEERING CORPORATION
ENGINEERING • LANO PLANN;NG • SURVEYING
P~ s►
t
STANfO•ID "PUD" HAUPTMANN, P.a., i11110, PAIINIONNT .
f ~ I
EXHIBIT "C"
(1 of 12)
88.0010
FIELD NOTES
All that certain tract or parcel or land situated in the Moreau Forrest Survey,
Abstract Number 417, the William D. Durham Survey, Abstract Number 330, Denton
County, Texas, and being part or the Moreau Forrest Subdivision as shown in
I Volume 236, Page 50, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas and being more fully
described as follows:
Beginning for the southern northeast corner of the tract being des:ribed herein at a
found iron pin, said iron pin also being the northeast corner of a tract shown by
decd to Tom Prouty, Trustee and recorded in Volume 1661, Page 415, Denton County
Real Property Records, said corner also being in Trinity Road (a public right-or-
way), and the northeast corner of Lot 13, Block A or said Moreau Forrest
Subdivision;
Thence South 03 degrees 20 minutes 21 seconds West, along the east line of said
Prouty tract, said Lot 13, Block A. passing Its southeast corner, the same being the
northeast corner or Lot 6, Block B, continuing along said course, and along said
Trinity Road a distance of 2322.76 feel to a found iron pin for the southeast corner
of said Prouty tract, and In the north right-of-way line or Blagg Road (a public
right-of-way);
Thence South 03 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds East, along the east line of said
( Lot 6, Block B, a distance of 47.63 feet to an angle point;
Thence South 02 degrees 56 minutes 35 seconds West, along the east line of said
Lot 6, Block B, a distance of 2237.67 feet to a point in the north line of a tract
shown by deed to Gar; Miller, Trustee, as recorded in Volume 1677, Page 562 of the
Denton County Real ?roperty Records;
Thence South So degrees 53 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 24.82 feet to a
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument Q•318-W; said monument also being in a
west line of Garza-Little Elm Reservoir;
Thence South 87 degrees 04 minutes 52 seconds East, along a west line of said
Garza-Little Elm Reservoir, a distance of 368.20 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps or
Engineers Monument Q-317-W;
I
11123 FORT WORTH DRIVE • (DENTON. TEXAS 7e205 • Ie171 383-1418 • VETR0 43O-1692
250 SOUTH BTEMMONS • SUITE 300 • LEWtSV0..LE. TEXAS 75oe7 • r-A14) 221-2418
I
~ J
EXHIBIT "C"
(2 of 12)
Thence South 37 degrees 49 minutes 06 seconds East, along a west line of said
Garza-Little Elm Reservoir a distance of 32035 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-316-W;
Thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 20 seconds East, along a west line of Said Garza-
Little Elm Reservoir a distance of 421.92 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-315-W;
Thence South 67 degrees 03 minutes 16 seconds East, along a west line of said
Garza-Little Elm Reservoir a distance of 323.50 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-314-W;
Thence South 08 degrees 11 minutes 43 seconds East, along a west line of said
Garza-Little Elm Reservoir a distance of 501.43 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-313-W for the north corner of a tract shown by deed to Tom
Prouty, Trustee and recorded in Volume 1755, Page 495, Denton County Real
Property Records, and also being In the easternmost line of said Miller tract
(Volume 1677, Page 562), and in the cast line of Lot S, Block t of said Moreau
Forrest Subdivision;
Thence South 23 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East, departing the east line of said
Lot 5, Block E, and along a west line of said Garza-Little Elm Reservoir, it distance
of 490.89 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument Q•312-W, for the
east corner of said Prouty tract (Volume 1755, Page 495);
Thence South 34 degrees 06 minutes 54 seconds West, along a west line of said
Oafza•Little Elm Reservoir, a distance of 269.93 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-311•W; said monumet • Aso being the northeast corner of a
tract shown by deed to Tom Prouty, Trustee, as recorded in Volume 1770, Page 404
of the Denton County Real Property Records;
Thence South 33 degrees 01 minute 16 seconds East, along the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 11770, Page 404) and a west line of said Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 281.65 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineeri
Monument Q-310-W, for the northernmost southeast corner of said Prouty tract
(Volume 1770, Page 404);
Thence South 00 degrees 35 minutes 13 seconds West, passing at 12.77 feet, the
southern southeast corner of said Prouty tract, the some being the easternmost
northeast corner of a tract shown by deed to Gary Miller, Trustee as recorded In
Volume 1654, Page 232 of the Denton County Real Property Records, continuing
along said course along a west line of said Garza-Little Elm Reservoir, a total
distance of 412.33 feet to a found U.S. Army corps of Engineers Monument
Q-309-Ws
2
11
i
J
- -
EXHIBIT "C"
(3 of 12)
Thence South 06 degrees 11 minutes 34 seconds East, along the east line of said
Miller tract (Volume 1654, Page 232), and a west line of said Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 792.72 feet to a fo•ind U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-308-W;
Thence South 03 degrees 34 minutes 03 seconds West, along the east line of said
Miller tract (Volume 1654, Page 232), and a west line of said Garza-Little Elm _
Reservoir, a distance of 576.21 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-307-W, for the south corner of said Miller tract (Volume 1654,
Page 232);
Thence North 54 degrees 56 minutes 58 seconds West, along the southwestern line of
said Miller tract (Volume 1654, Page 232), and a northwestern line of said Garza-
Little Elm Reservoir, a distance of 437,40 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-306-W;
Thence North 45 degrees 20 minutes 17 seconds West, along the southwestern line of
said Miller tract (Volume 1654, Page 232), and a northwestern line of said Garza.
Little Elm Reservoir, a distance of 306.29 feet to a found U.S. Army corps of
Engineers Monument Q-305-W;
Thence North 57 degrees 15 minutes 14 seconds West, along the southwest line of
said Miller tract (Volume 1654, Page 232), and a northwestern line of said Garza.
Little Elm Reservoir, a distance of 448.62 feet to o found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-304-W;
Thence North 35 degrees 43 minutes 59 seconds West, continuing along the west line
of said Miller tract (Volume 1654, Page 232), and it northwestern line of said Garza-
Little Elm Reservoir, passing a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument Q-303-W,
in all a total distance of 880.95 feet to a found iron pin in the center of Mills Road
(a public right-cf•way), and also being the western northwest corner of said Miller
tract (Volume 1654, Page 232), and in the south line of said Miller tract
(Volume 1677, Page $62);
Thence North 87 degrees 39 minutes 33 seconds West, along the south line of said
Miller tract (Volume 1677, Page 562), and with sold WIN Road a distance of 196.71
feet to a found lion pin for the northeast corner of a tract shown by deed to Tom
II' Prouty and recorded In Volume 1666, Page 781 and Page 795 Denton County Real
Property Records;
Thence South 03 degrees 00 minutes 44 seconds West, stool the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1666, Page 781 and 795), and a west line of Lot 2, the east line
! of Lot I, Block F, of said Moreau Forrest Subdivision, Passing a U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-302•1W, continuing along said course, in all a total distance
of 399.96 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument Q-301-BW;
Thence South 03 degrees 00 minutes 44 seconds West, along the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1666, Pale 781 and 795), the west line of Lot 2, the east line of
i Lot 1, Block F, of said Moreau Forrest Subdivision and a western line of said Garza-
Little Elm Reservoir, a distance o: 351.35 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q•301-AW;
3
I ~
EXHIBIT "C"
(4 of 12)
Thence South 03 degrees 00 minutes 44 seconds West, along the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1666, Page 781 and 795), the west line of Lot 2, the east line of
Lot i, Block F, and a western line of said Garza-Little Elm Reservoir, a distance of
450.00 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument Q-301-W; said
monument also being the northernmost corner of a tract shown by deed to Tom
Prouty, Trustee and recorded in Volume 1589, Page 504, Denton County Real
Property Records;
Thence South 60 degrees 20 minutes 34 seconds East, along the northern line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and a western line of said Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 532.60 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-300-W;
Thence South 37 degrees 1 l minutes 33 seconds East, along th. northeastern line of
said Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and a western line of said Garza-Little
Elm Reservoir, a distance of 406,29 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-299-W;
Thence South 40 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds East, along the northeastern line of
said Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and a western line of said Garza-Little
Elm Reservoir, a distance of $51.29 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-298-W;
Thence South 33 degrees 46 minutes 57 seconds East, along the northeastern fine of
said Prouty tract (volume 1589, Page 504), and it western line of said Garza-Little
Elm Reservoir, passing the south line of Lot 2, Block F, the same being tfie north
tine of Lot 7, Block F of said Moreau Forrest Subdivision, in all a total distance of
277.90 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument Q-297-W;
Thence South 25 degrees 00 minutes 49 seconds West, along the western east line of
said Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and a western line of said Garza-Little
Elm Reservoir, a distance of 152.69 feet to it found U.S. Army corps of Engineers
Monument Q-296-W;
i
Thence South 09 degrees 31 minutes 16 seconds 'lest, along the western east line of
said Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and a western line of said Garza-Little
Elm Reservoir, a distance of 296.82 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-295-W;.
Thence North 48 degrees 15 minutes 12 seconds East, along a western line of said
Garza-Little Elm Reservoir, a distance of 258.99 feet to a fount U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument Q-294-W, for easternmost northeast corner of said Prouty tract
(Volume 1589, Page $04);
Thence South 02 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds West, along the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1389, Page 504), and a western line of sold Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 443.88 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-293-BW;
4
EXHIBIT "C"
(5 of 12)
Thence South 02 degrees 23 minutes 05 seconds West, along the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and a western line of said Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 949.52 feet to a found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q-293-W;
Thence South 02 degrees 23 minutes 38 secords West, along the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1589. Page 504), and a western line of Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 435.35 feet to it found U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument Q•292•BW;
Thence South 01 degree 56 minutes 31 seconds West, along the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and a western line of Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 904.09 feet to a found iron pin for the southeast corner of
the last mentioned Prouty tract, and in the north line of a tract shown by deed to
Tom Prouty, Trustee and recorded In Volume 1578, Page 325, Denton County Real
Property R: cords;
Thence South 83 degrees 27 minutes 55 seconds East, along the north line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1578, Page 325), a distance of 343.26 feet to a found iron pin
for the northeast corner of said Prouty tract (Volume 1578, Page 325); said iron pin
also being the northwest corner of Vacation Village No. 5 (Revised) as shown of
record in Volume 12, Page i9 of the Denton County Plat Records, and the northwest
corner of Lot 23, Block H of said Vacation Village;
Thence South 02 degrees 27 minutes 48 seconds West, along the east line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1578, Page 325), and the west line of said Vacation Village, a
distance of 130.26 feet to a found iron pin for corner; said Iron pin also being the
southwest corner of Lot 23, Block H of said Vacation Village;
Thence South 81 degrees 13 minutes 32 seconds West, a distance of 8614 feet to a
found iron pin for corner;
Thence South 68 degrees 27 minutes 45 seconds West, a distance of 111.13 feet to a
found iron pin for corner;
Thence South 55 degrees 08 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 134.14 feet to a
found iron pin for corner;
Thence North 83 degrees 40 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 78.18 feet to a
I fount iron pin for corner;
l Thence North 63 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 149.69 feet to a
` found iron pin for corner;
I~ Thence South 25 degrees 57 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 232.50 feet to a
II fence corner post for corner;
Thence South 63 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 149.37 feet to a
fence corner post for corner;
5
a
I ~
EXHIBIT "C"
(6 of 12)
Thence North 26 degre(a 02 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 168.76 feet to a
found iron pin for corner;
Thence SoutA 83 degrees 40 minutes 47 seconds East, a distance of 122.65 feet to a
found iron p,n for corner;
Thence North 55 degrees 08 minutes 07 seconds East, a distance of 150,52 feet to a
found iron pin for corner;
Thence North 68 degrees 27 minutes 44 seconds East, a distance of 101.42 feet to a
found iron pin for corner;
Thence North 81 degrees 13 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 62.77 feet to a
found iron pin for corner;
Thence South 87 degrees 32 minutes 12 seconds East, a distance of 15.0 feet to a
found iron pin for corner in the east line of said Prouty tract (Volume 1578,
Page 325), and the west line of said Vacation Village; said Iron pin also being the
northwest corner of Lot 6, Block P of said Vacation Village;
Thence South 02 degrees 27 minutes 48 seconds West, along the east line of sad
Prouty tract (Volume 1578, Page 325), and the west line of said Vacation Village., a
distance of 1800.00 feet to a found Iron pin for corner;
Thence South 26 degrees 28 minutes 54 seconds West, along the east line of the last
mentioned Prouty tract, and the west line of said Vacation Village, a distance of
274.05 feet to a found iron pin for corner;
Thence South 42 degrees 52 minutes 48 sr:ondi West, along the east line of the last
mentioned Prouty tract, and the west line of said Vacation Village, a distance of
220.14 feet to a found iron pin in the northeast right-of-way line of Farm-to-Market
Road Number 4:5 (also known as McKinney Street); said Iron pin also being a point
in the northwestern line of Lot 6, Block Q of said Vacation Village;
Thence South 45 degrees 29 minutes 50 seconds V':st, n distance of 100.13 feet to a
point on the south right-of-way line of sold Farm-to-Market Road Number 426 (also
known as McKinney Street);
Thence South 01 degree 58 minutes 17 seconds Wcst, along the eRst line of said
Prouty tract, the west line of a tract shown by deed to the Biacl.well Estate and
worded in Volume 1147, Page 530 of the Denton County Deed Records; and with
the general course of a fen.e a distance of 1472,35 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Monument P-250•C-W;
6
I
~I
1'
EXHIBIT "C"
(7 of 12)
Thence North 86 degrees 55 minutes 27 seconds West, along the south line of said
Prouty tract, (Volume 1578 Page 325) and a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers line
between Monument P-250-C-W, and Monument P-250-W, a distance of 1111.07 feet to
the southeast corner of said Prouty tract (Volume 1578, Page 325); said point also
being a point in the east line of a tract shown by deed to L.L. Farris and recorded in
Volume 253, Page 389 of the Denton County Deed Records; _
Thence North 03 degrees 58 minutes 25 seconds East, along the west line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1578, Page 325), and the east tin: of said Farris tract, a
distance of 2340.84 feet to a point in the south line of Farm-to-Market Road
Number 426 (also known as McKinney Street);
Thence North 12 degrees 51 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of 137.12 feet to an
angle point on the northern right-of-way line of Farm-to-Market Road Number 426;
said point also being a point on the east line of a tract shown by deed to A.L.
Vaughn and recorded In Volume 188, Page 591 of the Denton County Deed Records;
Thence North 03 degrees 12 minutes 57 seconds East, along the west line of the last
mentioned Prouty tract, and the east line of said Vaughn tract, a distance of
1566.45 feet to a fence corner post for the northwest corner of said Prouty tract
(Volume 1578, Page 325), and In the south line of said Prouty tract (Volume 1589,
Page 504), sacs the northern northwest corner or said W.D. Durham Survey, and In
the east line of said Gideon Wtlker Survey Abstract Number 1330;
Thence North 64 degrees 49 minutes 18 seconds West, along the south line of said
Prouty tract (Vc„sme 1589, Page 504), and the northeastern line of said Vaughn
tract, a distance of 411.15 feet to a found iron pin for the southwest corner of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504); said iron pin also being in the east tine of
Lot 6, Block F. the same being the west line of Lot 7, Block F of said Moreau
Forrest Subdivision, and the southeast corner of a tract shown by deed to J.M.
Keisoe and recorded in Volume 756, Page 651 of the Denton County Deed Records;
Thence North Ot degree 58 minutes 28 seconds East, along the west line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), the east line of said Kalsae tract, and said
Lot 6, and the west line of said Lot 7, Block F, a distance of 706.01 feet to a found
Iron pin for corner;
Thence North 02 degrees 39 minutes 15 seconds East, continuing along the west line
of the last mentioned Prouty tract; also passing the northeast corner of said Ketsoe
tract, the same being the southeast corner of a tract shown by deed to J.M. Skinner
and recorded 21 June 1947, County Clerk's File Number 2981, In all a total distance
of 2126.97 feet to a fence corner post for an ell corner of said Prouty tract
(Volume 1589, Page 504); said fence corner post also being the northeast corner of
said Skinner tract, the northeast corner of said Lot 6, Block F, the northwest corner
of Lot 7, Block F, the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block F, and the southeast corner
of Lot 1, Block F of said Moreau Forrest Subdivislcn;
Thence North 84 degrees 52 minutes 05 seconds West, along the southern north line
of said Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and the north line of said Skinner
tract, a distance of 554.33 feet to a fence corner post for corner;
7
I
EXHIBIT "C"
(8 of 12)
Thence North 05 degrees 49 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of 10.33 feet to a
fence corner post for corner;
Thence North 88 degrees 40 minutes 39 seconds West, along the southern north line
of said Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), and the north line of said Skinner
tract, a distance of 834.09 feet to a found Iron pin for corner In Trinity Road,
(a public road), and also being the northern southwest corner of said Prouty tract
(Volume 1589, Page 504);
Thence North 00 degrees 26 minutes 24 seconds East, with said Trinity Road, and
the west line of said Prouty tract (Volume 1589, Page 504), a distance of 525.40 feet
to a found iron pin for the northwest corner of the last mentioned Prouty tr :ct;
Thence South 86 dettrees 27 minutes 23 seconds East, along the western north line of
said Prouty tract, (Volume 1589, Page 504) a distance of 669.42 feet to a found Iron
pin for corner; said Iron pin also being in the south line or said Prouty tract
(Volume 1666, Page 781 and 795);
Thence North 16 degrees 46 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 146.41 feet to a
found iron pin for corner;
Thence North 82 degrees 28 minutes 58 seconds West, along the northwestern south
line of said Prouty tract (Volume 1666, Page 781), a distance of 710.75 feet to a
found iron pin for southwest corner of said Prouty !Tact; (Volume 1666, Page 781),
and also being in said Trinity Road, and in the west line of sold Lot I, Block F;
Thence North 02 d-grees 40 minutes 47 seconds East, along the west line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1666, Page 781), and the west tine of said Lot 1, block F, and
along said Trinity Road, a distance of $61.45 feet to a found Iron pin;
Thence South 86 degrees 14 minutes 56 seconds East, a distance of 194.01 feet to a
fence corner post;
Thence North 48 degrees 23 minutes 42 seconds East, a distance of 28.64 feet to a
fence corner post;
Thence North 09 degrees 18 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 11.59 feet to a
fence corner post;
Thence North 39 degrees 19 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 87.11 feet to a
fence corner post;
Thence North 75 degrees 08 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of 144.36 feet to a
found Iron pin; sold found iron pin also being In the west line or said Prouty tract
(Volume 1666, Page 781 and 795) and In sold Trinity Road;
8
I~
a
EXHIBIT "C"
(9 of 12)
Thence North 02 degrees 40 minutes 47 seconds East, along the west line of the last
mentioned Prouty tract, the west line of said Lot I, Block F, and along said Trinity
Road part of the way, a distance of 848.67 feet to a found iron pin for the
northwest corner of said Prouty tract; said iron pin also being in Mills Road and
the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block F, the southwest . )rner of Lot 12, Block B, the
southeast corner of Lot 11, Block B, and the northeast corner of Lot 5, Block C of
said Moreau Forrest Subdivision;
Thence North 85 degrees 07 m;nutes 34 seconds West along the north line of said Lot
I Block F, the south line of '_ot 12 Block 8, and along said Mills Road, a distance of
133.54 feet to a found iron pin for the southwest corner of a certain tract 1
conveyed to William B. Wi'.son in Volume 1763 Page 144 Denton County Real
property Records;
Thence North 01 degrees 43 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 1161.76 feet :o a
found iron pin, being the northwest corner of said Wilson Tract and in the northern
south line of said Miller tract (Volume 1677 Page 562);
Thence North 86 degrees 56 minutes 06 seconds West, with the northern south line
of said Miller tract, (Volume 1677, Page 562), a distance of 683.11 feet to a found
iron pin for the northern southwest corner of said Miller tract;
Thence North 02 degrees 47 minutes 21 seconds East, along the west line of said
Miller tract (Volume 1677, Page 562), and the west line of Lot it, Block B. passing
its rorthwest corner, the same being the southwest corner of Lot 5, Block B of said
Moreau Forrest Subdivision, continuing along said course and the west line of said
Lot S. In all a total distance of 3638.93 feet to a fence corner post for the northwest
corner of said Miller tract in the south right-of-way line of Blagg Road; said fence
corner post also being the northwest corner of said Lot 3, Block D. and the southwest
corner of Lot 12, Block A;
Thence South 86 degrees 56 minutes 06 seconds East, along the north line of said
Miller Tract (Volume 1677, Page 562), the north line of said Lot 5, Block B, the south
line of said Lot 12, Block A, and the south right-of-way line of said Blagg Road, a
distance of 518.02 feet to a point for corner; said point also being the southern
southwest corner of said Prouty tract (Volume 1661, Page 415);
Thence North 29 degrees 47 minutes 07 seconds East, along the eastern west line of
said Prouty tract (Volutre 1661, Page 415), a distance of 504.13 feet to a fence corner
post;
Thence North 59 degrees 52 minutes 24 seconds West, along the southwestern line of
said Prouty tract (Volume 1661, Page 415) a distance of 828.29 feet to a fence corner
post, in the west line of said Prouty tract; said point also being In the west line of
said Lot 12, Block A;
Thence North 02 degrees 42 minutes 45 seconds East, along the west line of said
Prouty tract (Volume 1661, Page 415), and the west line of said Lot 12, Block A, a
distance of 1229.83 feet to a fence corner post for the northwest corner of said
Pro ty tract (Volume 1661, Page 415); said fence corner post also being the northwest
corner of said Lot 12, Block A, and the southwest cotner of sold Lot 6, Block A;
9
EXHIBIT "C"
(10 of 12)
Thence South 8J degrees 10 minutes 30 seconds East, along the north line of said
Prouty trnet {Volume 1661, Pago 415), the north line of said Lot l2, Block A, and the
south line of said Lot 6, Block A, a distance of 55.24 feet to a fence corner post; said
fence corner post also being the southwest corner of a tract shown by deed to RMB
Land Co„ Ltd. and recorded in Volume 1183, Page 780, of the Denton County Real
Property Records, and the southeast corner of the remainder of a tract shown by
deed to Ralph T. Bullard and recorded in Volume IS21, Page 948 of the Denton
County Real Property Records;
Thence North 02 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds East, along the west line of said
RMB tract, and the cast line of the remainder of said Bullard tract, a distance of
923.60 feet to a found iron pin for the northwest corner of said RMB tract, and in
the south right-of-way line of U.S. Highway Number 380;
Thence North 81 degrees 59 minutes 26 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract and the south line of said right-of-way, a distance of 183.18 feet to a
concrete monument for corner;
Thence North 87 degrees 27 minutes 34 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract and the south line of said right-of-way, a distance of 100.06 feet to a
concrete monument for corner;
thence North 82 degrees 05 minutes 20 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB trait and the south line of said right-of-way, a distance of 415,73 feet to a
concrete monument for corner;
Thence South 02 degrees 37 !;i'nutes 3 seconds West, a distance of 100.20 feet to a
found Iron pin for corner ".11 One southern north line of said RMB tract;
Thence South 86 degrees 59 minutes 42 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract a distance of 308.34 feet to a found Iron pin;
Thence South 86 degrees 38 minutes 11 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract a distance of 577.65 feet to a found Iron pin;
Thence South 87 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconos East, along the north line of said
RMB tract, a distance of 129.21 feet to a found Iron pin;
Thence South 86 degrees 32 minutes 32 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract, a distance of 195,94 feet to a found iron pln;
Thence South 87 degrees 35 minutes 38 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract, a distance of 113.57 feet to a found Iron pin;
Thence South 86 degrees 49 minutes 13 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract, a distance of 315.97 feet to a found Iron pin;
i
Thence South 87 degrees 14 minutes 43 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract, a distance of 100.75 feet to a found iron pin;
10
{
EXHIBIT "C"
(11 of 12)
Thence South 86 degrees 46 minutes 40 seconds East, along the north line of said
RMB tract, a distance of 30.56 feet to a found iron pin; said Iron pin also being the
northeast corner of said RMB Lraet, and in the west right-of-way line of Trinity
Road;
Thence South 02 degrees 35 minutes 45 seconds Wcst, along the cart line of said
RMB tract, and the west line of said Trinity Road, a distance of 930.72 feet to a
found iron pin;
Thence South 87 degrees 23 minutes 14 seconds East, a distance of 24.75 fact to the
Point of Beginning and containing 873.286 acres of Land.
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT
All that certain tract or parcel of lard situated in the Moreau Forre.c Survey
Abstract Number 417 Denton County, Texas; said tract being all of two tracts shown
by deed to Jerry D. Wells and wife April Ann Wells, one deed recorded in Volume
2229 Page 117 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, the other
recorded in Volume 1735 Page 762 of said Denton County Real Property Records,
and all of a tract shown by deed to Danny Leon Kimes and wife Martha Kimes
recorded in Volume 1906 Page 742 Denton County Real Property Records, also being
all of a tract shown by deed to Joe R. Coyne eI al Trustee recorded in Volume 1638
Page 477 Denton County Real Property Records and being more fully described as
follows,
Commencing at a found iron pin for the northern southwest corner of said Miller
tract (Volume 1677 Page 562),
Thence South 86 degrees 36 ntlnutes 06 seconds East a distance of 1803.04 feet to a
found iron pin at the north vest corner of said Wells tract (Volume 2229 Page 117)
for the Point of Beginning of the herein described tract;
Thence South 86 degrees 56 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 376.18 fact to the
northeast corner of said Wells tract (Volume 2229 Page 117);
Thence South 03 degrees 58 minutes 06 seconds West passing at 127.49 feel an iron r
pin found at the southeast corner of said Wells tract (Volume 2229 Page 117) same
being the northeast corner of said Wells tract (Volume 1735 Page 762), passing at
254.83 feet an Iron pin found at the southeast corner of said Well, tract (Volume i
1733 Page 762) same being the northeast corner of said Kimes tract, passing at
382.17 feet the southeast corner of said Kimes tract same being the northeast corner
of said Coyne tract continuing for a total distance of 551.11 feet to an angle point
In the cast line of said Coyne tract and being on the west aide of Trinity Road;
Thence South 43 degrees 30 minutes 14 seconds West along the northwest side of
Trinity Road a distance of 146.29 feet to the southeast corner of said Coyne tract;
Thence North 87 degrees 03 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 267,74 feet to the
southwest corner of said Coyne tract;
II
t
` i
I ~
EXHIBIT "C"
(12 of 12)
41 sez-onds
East s
northwest corners of said GoYnetractsametbcangohe southwest
norwest
pine found rat 0h2 d
corner of KKirnts tract, Pasamca6eing2 heesou hwr st ciorner of saidewellsht act
corner of said
(Volume 1735 Page 762) passing at 535.76 feet an iron pin found the so the northwest Corner me bcir%g corner or said wells e ( trac, 2229 Page 1517)
co continuing for a totald'sstanee of 66298
and leaving an
of said wells
faet to the point of Beginning and containing 5.487 sues of land,
area of 867,799 acres of land.
i
3
12
I
i
I
IF I
i
i
1
i
4, 114444-
I
DATE: 10/16/88
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION jF AN ORDINANCE FOR THE PETITION OF RMB,
INC. REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND CONCEPT PLAN
ON PROPERTY CURRENTLY ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD-68 AND PD-89)
AND AGRICULTURAL (A). THE REQUEST INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 414.9
ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET NORTH OF I-359
AND EXTENDING TO PECAN CRREK AND MORE FULLY SHOWN IN THE GIDEON
VALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1330, AND THE WILLIAM DURHAM SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 330 (Z-1861)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval ly a 6 to 0
vote at its September 14, 1988 meeting.
SUMMARY:
The request was analyzed using the Denton Development Guide. The
attachments include a description of the policies and how the
proposal relates to the policies.
i
BACKGROUND:
A detailed statement of history of area since 1484 is attached.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Property owner, adjacent property owner and City of Denton
t
i
F *'!,AL IMPACT:
No impact has been determined at this time.
I
*iCiy ully subm itted:
Prepared by: sr e
ager
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Ap oved:
rt. obbins
7rLkl
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
08580
i
I
I +
I
PLANNING AND ZONING (.U'IMMISSIUN
RECOMbIENDA'i'i0N '10 C11Y COUNCIL
i
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1541 Meeting Date: October 18, 19bb
GENERAL INFORMATION
RMB Realty, Inc.
Applicant: First City Bank Tower
201 Main Street, Suite 2420
' Fort Worth, Texas 76102
i
Status of Applicant: Land Owner
Approval of a planned Bevel-
Requested Action: opment and concept plan on
property currently zoned
planned development (PD-86
and YD•89) and agricultural.
The following land uses are
proposed:
Single Family - 10
93.4 acres with a density
of 3.2 units per acre ii
SingZ09.4macres with a density
of 4.3 units per acre
Cluster Homes '
10.6 acres with a density
of b units per acre
multi-Family
i - 16.0 acres with a density
of 2 units per acre
Neighborhood Service
6,0 acres
community Facility
I - 3.0 acres E
General Retail
- 12.0 acres 1
School/Park
10.0 acres
Park
. 1b.0 acres
Right-of-way k
36.5 acres
i
1-1661
Page 2
GENERAL INFORMATION (continued)
Location and Size: The request includes approxi. _
mately 414,9 arses of Property
located approxiniately 1,100 feet
north of 1-35E and extending to
Pecan Creek,
Surrounding Land Use North - Pecan Creek, Agricultural,
and Zoning: and PL-126 (Proposed zoning
2-6b-013)
South - Corinth City Limits,
I,H. 35, and Agricultural
East Shady Shores and Corinth
City Limits, Hidden Valley
and Chaparral Estates, and
Garza-Little Elm Reservoir
Kest - Residential, Broken Arrow
Ranch Estates, Agricultural,
and Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction (ETJ)
Denton Development Guide: Low Intensity Area
SPECIAL INFORMATION
+ i
Transportation: A traffic study was prepared by
DeShazo, Starek, and Tang, Inc,
to address the construction of and j
improvement to the road facilities.
The concept Plan includes a major
arterial to be consLructed in I
phases from 1,11. 35 to U.S. Highway
360, The property has frontage on
Shady Shores Road, Pockrus Road and
Swisher Road, based on the traffic
study, conditions relating to the t
road improvements have been recom-
mended, Other interior roads will
be approved with the detailed plan
and preliminary plat.
Utilities: A preliminary utility plan for
water and wastewater has been
submitted. The plan shows the
major distribution lines, Siring
Ik - - -
2-1861
Page 3
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
of utility lines will be determined
in conjunction with the detailed
plan and preliminary and final plat.
City participation in oversizing of
water and wastewater lines is not
anticipated, 'the property is lo-
cated in a dual ei,~ctric service
area with the City of Denton and
Texas Utilities. The Citv will
provide street lighting for the
development. Other utilities, i.e.
telephone, cable, etc., will be
provided as development occurs.
Drainage: Drainage will be a major concern
addressed in the detailed plan and
preliminary plat stage. Drainage
studies will be required with the
submission of those documents.
Some of the property is designated
as floodplain and floodway.
HISTORY
The property was annexed _n 1984 and 1986, In December of 1984,
the City Council adopted ordinance:, establisling Planned Develop-
ment-bb for SF-7 and estate lots on 17,1 acres and Planned Devel-
opment-89 for manufactured housing subdivision on 49.43 acres of
property located at the southwest corner of i'ockrus and Swisher
roads,
The :Tanning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the
creation of a moderate node at the future intersection of Colorado
Bouletiard and Lakeview Boulevard on December 16, 1967. The City
Council in February of 1966 denied the request for creation of the
node but indicated that they would consider tKe request in con-
junction with the zoning proposal.
A request for zoning was scheduled but withdrawn from the June 6,
1986 Planning and Zoning Commission agenda.
i
the Commission held a public hearing on July 27, 1988 to consider
a change in zoning on this property; however, the petitioner
requested that the zoning case be tabled in order for concerns of
the neighbors to be addressed.
i
J
Z-1661
Page 4
ANALYSIS
Intensity:
The property is located in a low intensity area as designated by _
the Development Guide.
The concept plan, based on the Development Guide intensity
standards, is 61 under the low intensity standards. Therefore,
less than a proportionate share of intensity is being requested.
Low intensity areas:
Low intensity breas are the primary residential areas in the City.
In order to ensure an overall traffic balance in the City, these
areas were created to include residential land uses and limited
amounts of non-residential land uses.
Concentration and Separation Policies:
the Development Guide states that in low intensity areas non-
residential land uses, such as neighborhood service, general
retail, office, etc., should be limited to four acres and
separated from another concentration by 112 mile, The concept
plan includes three areas to be evaluated under this policy.
Tract 12 is four acres in size located at the intersection of
Yockrus Road (collector) and proposed Lakeview Boulevard and
is separated by 3,000 feet from Tract 15. Tract 15 is two acres
in size and is located adjacent to the proposed greenbelt park.
Tract 6 is 12 acres in size located 3,20U feet from Tract 15 and
I 2,700 feet from Tract 12.
l
Tract 6 at the future intersection of Colorado Boulevard and
Lakeview boulevard violates the concentration policy for low
intensity areas. the tract could serve as a grocery store site j
which typically requires 10 to lZ acres of land to develop.
Because of the location of the property at the future intersec-
tion of Lakeview Boulevard and Colorado boulevard, and the lack
of another site at an intersection within approximately 5,000 feet
to 5,201) feet, the Commission may wish to expand the concentration
policy.
i
According to the Development Guide, multi-family is limited to
a 20U unit concentration separated by 1/2 mile in low intensity
areas. Tracts 3 and 11 each include 200 units. Tract 3 is ap-
proximately 3,500 feet from Tract 11, Tract 3 is approximately
2,100 feet from the multi-family in the Lakeview request and In
YD-126, but the multi-family concentrations are not only separated
by Pecan Creek but also by a proposed cluster housing area.
f
V
2-1861
Page 5
ANALYSIS (continued)
Uther Policies and Considerations:
` The Development Guide states that housing diversity is strongly
encouraged. The policy continues by stating that diversified
` housing patterns should be well planned to insure that neighbor-
hood integrity is maintained. the concept plan has a diversity
of housing types and lot sizes and a good transition of land uses.
The concept plan Indicates 16 acres of park land and a 10 acre
ir.int school/park site, approximately five acres for each use, The
City gu+de for dedication of park land is one acre oper100 dwelling
units or three acres per 1,000 population. Based
lines and total units proposed of 1,711 on the concept plan, 17
arres would be required; and based on a projected popula- tion of
floodplain required. be xreacres are
claimed.
outside IS acres
The concept plan meets the park land dedication guidelines.
A buffer zone has been added along Yockrus Road in the neighborhood
service area, Tract 12, and along Swisher Road In the single-family
with 10,000 square foot lot area Tract 16. Tract 18 adjacent to
Swisher Road
ngle-family
Swisher Road andlthevreartlottline0offthe proposedesiarea between
subdivision.
RhCOMMPNDATIUN
Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1861 by a
F 7e6
0 with the following conditions: mation waived by the Planning and Development
e submitted
t at the concept plan stage shall b
wdetailed plan for each phase of development in-
cluding: location of lots in a residential subdivision;
location of major drainage facilities and improvements;
location of major electrical lines; and location, size
I
and type of all fences, berms, or screening devices.
2. Tracts 6 and 13 designated as park and school sites shall
be dedicated to the City of Denton with the first approved
final plat for the phase in which the property is located
(excluding platting for public improvements only).
3. The developer will be responsible for elevating a portion of
Tract 15 to a level above the 100-year floodplain as deter-
any facilities s on site thwill e be
construction of that a buildable
t prior City to of Denton, so
available
property.
~s
I
4
i 1
P
b
Page
RECUMMENVATION (continued)
f 4. Road construction and improvemha
nts singhschedule~mpNotbuilding
1 accordance with the a ttached p hase of development
II permits shall be issued for the nex~he phases has been
until the bridge structure linking
completed.
5, Land uses permitted in the following categorieendix]B,b2oning
accordance with the sectionsT of following specific
Ordinance, of the Code
.
restrictions are imposed,
General Retail: Article 7, Subsections G and H.
p ce: ro essional and Administrative Offices.
e gi orhood Service: Article 71 Subsection H.
Communit acilit Land uses shall be approved with the
F
eta e p an or those tracts. Community facility uses
may include:
Art Gallery or Museum
Cemetery
Church or Rectory
College j.- University
Public School
Private School
Community Center
Day Nursery, Day Care or Kindergarten
Hospital
Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature
Library
Nursing Home or Residence Home For Aged Park, Playground or Public Community Center
Fire Station or Similar Public Safety Building
Public Building of rovedtonedetailedrpla Government
other similar uses app f
6. The construction of the roads shall not be financed by bonds
sold in accordance with provisions of a Road Utility District.
l
ALTERNATIVES
1, Approve petition f
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
Deny petition
r
V
r
Z-1861
Page 7
ATTACIIMENIS
1. Location Map - Page 1
2. Concept Plan - Page 2
3. Development Standards - Pages 3-6
4. Summary of Zoning Restrictions - Page 7
` S. Typical Lot Layouts - Pages B-12
r 6. Phasing Schedule - Pages 13-3S
7. Utility Plan - Page 36
8. Intensity Analysis Z-1861 - Page 37
9. Summary of Land Uses Z-1861 - Page 38-39
10. Ordinance 84-180 - Pages 40-44
11. Ordinance 84-181 - Pages 45-50
12. Concept Plan Z-88-0I3 - Page 51
13. Background Information - Page 52-53
14. Denton Development Guide Policies - Page S4-55
i 15. Summary of Zoning Case and Previous Zoning Cases - Page 56-57
16. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July 2'i,
1988 - Page 58-62
17. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
September 14, 1988 Page 63-68
18. Neighborhood Parks Information - Page 69-74
h
I E
i
i
f
1
,r
l
i v
T
1
ATTAMMENT 1
11861
SOUTHVIEW
F1WY' 3aO
O
CITY OF 0,00 ~
DENTON
ti
cpv M~~q1 y
CL
o
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
SITE
i'
oil. ~ t
CORIN~Ii /
LOCATION MAP
w
t
ATTACILMEN1 2
I ¢ I i
Y
NANO ur wrwnAwtr . ~ ~ ~ ~~,'G
wurwvrw 1
3.'= tl' A: M
L
1'. 4 W r ! V
WMI1Y 1 , • . T_ T ~i
nH fi ICY Iui~4\ 4Y..
toll
•TIN4, NI •W 54 ~
1 T
II
Ir.l.r .nv I 11 iv 1 '
ICY I ' '
V ••v
e.v.vpµT -
- - -e,.l.
r.
11
COIIO•H /LAN Ia
SOUTHVIEW
KAMI•• Wr•l0'M•N1 DINt•q, T•KM
~LI"~~ .....,IN. IwN1•INV1uNN RIYVIIITNyT1N1
IMI NYTV. .N. t . • ft d,
M,L
4r., flv {1111 T%II ,M N. ,NIT
.TI_ WI •Illly[ r 2 n"'Wdl 11 %.y ' T,d N. I M MNI• IYr/ 1,N b4 NT~
14.MIe IIM•IF NMI'111 Ynw 4'M NM IrM ~ry~IM Y+I Il1I IIVI /w11,.4N Id." 11111
♦.yI ~ 11' ••1 I 1 M N
ATTACHMENT 3
DEVELCPKLNT STANDARDS
CONCEPT PLAN
8-26-88
1. Statement of intent of Owners
Southview Planned Development ( PD) is a proposed mixed use development with commercial
residential and open space land uses. The development concept is in response to: thi
physical relationship of_the site to Lake Lewisvillet compatibility and diversity of
land uses, providing community housing employment and commercial activity, balance of
transtortation system w/Land uses publicsafety w/improved access 6 circulations pro-
viding improved water 6 sanitary sewer systemai and maintaining open apace greenbelts
as well as providing park b school facilities for the region.
2. Statement Indicating Ralation to Denton Development Guides
Southview Planned Development (PD) proposes a reduction in density front the
previo sly approved Southview PD The intention is a quality development for
Denton in accordance with the D on evelopment Guide
3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed Diatricts
',14.9 acres
Land U849 and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tracts
Total Proposed Acreage
a. Single Family Detached 302.8
b. Single Family Attached itownhoussa, cluster, etc.) 10.6
c. Attached Patio/Garden/Iero Lot Line
i _
d. Duplex of Multi-family 16.0
f, office
90 Neighborhood Service 6.0
h. General Retail 12.0
is Commercial
is Light Industrial -
k. Heavy Industrial -
1. Other (specify) Park 18.0
School/Park 10.0
Community Facilities 3.0
Kajor ROW 24.6
Collector ROW 11.9
Total 414.9 Ac.
-3-
i
r
4
Development Standard$
Page 1
S, Ott-Site InLotsxatio~ - adJacent or surrounding land uses, toning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
` (Shown on SgA= or detailed plan.)
b. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept o)"Oewsaw plan.)
Projected Traffic Generation. (eased on traffic study, if required.)
Refer to traffic study report
euildingss
a, Approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
I b. Maximum heights
_ Shown in Summary on Concept plan
c, Minimum setbacksi (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Shown on Summary of Zoning Restrictions
d, Maximum gross floor sru (square feet) for r.onresidentials
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
I
S. Residential Subdlvislons
a. Number of units per acre ldansity)1
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
b. Number and location of lotse (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
To be shown in detail plan _
c, Minimum sizes width and depth of lotal (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) f
Shown in P.D. Zoning Rastriction Summery
d. Minimum front, side end coat yard setbackae (Shown on concept or detailed plan,)
Shown in P,D. Zoning Restriction Summary
-4-
Development Standards
tags 3
96 Wi ter and Dro149e - approx11Mate location of all existing or proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplainse othet voter retention of major drainage facilities
and improvements. (Shawn on utility plan.)
10. Utilities - 10CatiOn of all major seWerr Water or electrical lines and facilities.
(Shovn on concept oec~deoe0med plan.)
11. Location of trees 3' in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
(Shown on concept or49"ONd plan.) Tree masees are shorn on the concept plan.
Detail tree location is requested to be waived until detail plan review and
approval process.
12. open Space - location and site of gfeenbelts, patko, common and recreational areas.
(Shown on concept osb4o6eOOed plan.)
The locations of major parks and greenbelts are indicated on the concept plan
Further detail will be shown at the time of preliminary platting and detail _plan
r~
review and approval.
13. Screening - location, type and size of all fences, berms or screening features,
(Shown on concept ooodomeixed plan.)
Not applicable at this time. It is requested that detail screen design be
kaived until detail plan review and approval.
11. Development Schedule (concept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will
be iabmitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of
development. All dotes should indicate month and year.
Sae attachment for Development Schedule
ADDITIONAL PlQUIkjMPTS POX A DLTAILLD PLAN
lie Landscaping Plan - ajor feature and trpea of landscaping to be used.
Not applicable at this time. It is requested that detail landscape architectural
dasian be made a requir ment of the detail plan review and approval process.
-S-
h
Development Standards
Page /
Id. Signs - show location, type and sire on detailed plan, othervise, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the toning Ordinance,
Not applicable at this time. Any on-promise signs not in conformance with
Article 17 will be described on detailed site plan as to location, sire and type.
17, Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plane) Not applicable at this time. It is requested
that sidewalk locations be waived until detail site plan reviews
If, All information requited tot preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A
IDanton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances.
(A separate plat is required.)
19, Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rate of d w alopment, All dates should indicate month
and year.
See attached schedule. Additional schedule information will be submitted in
conjunction with detail plan and Preliminary Plat approval
i
I
1
{
i
E
Ab
3/17
-6-
N
I
`I I
8/28/38 (Revised 9-1-88) _
SUMMARY OF ZONING RESTRICTIONS - SOUTHVIEW
MAX MAX W. MA 1< F7101l1 M SIOE RUp LY1 PARK w6T Mf10f4N Ifl17 ;PERSON TEL
06 TRC1 NEf Mlll LAID M%A TYPICAL [Fd 01 Mel l0, A~X eU%OMA~ tblb P1D L,a I SPA" PER FER
' 17E S1C/UT10N ACIE! PER UNT L01 912E Y+OTH dOYEMOE fT. iSTURESI fAA YARD YARD YAfID PIS f of fA (AU[9i ACfE Otl
090
IMMA FAMLY-NI IlA 10,000 Of, b e 11! 120 10 99% NA 0 NA 90 10% f0 ENGL09E NA 92 1e1 9.1
NA /
111101 FAMLY•1 NSA Tp00 5F, to A 115 100 00 95% NA I NA 19 10% 10 1 ENCLOSE 000 l0 I'm
19tlFAI/LY•q IU 10000 If, N e 1t0/ .90 /0 Ie% W t NA 10 q% >0 1 ENOIA610 NA 1! K !1• HO
i
10' MIN I 1 Lt 1 01 I? 11e
I'1 Lem Howe 10,0 NA NA NA MA el% NA 1 NA 20 EPARATIO 1C EHCLOSE0 r-
} 10' MOL 10 L/S L/ e! 100 1.6 1.101
l b0 W M1LY 11.0 NA kA NA NA 10% NA 1 NA 20 EFARAFIO
{
VV COYNYN11V 0.0 NA NA NA NA 40% 111.111 9 0.1 10 NA 10 17911 S.F. NA NA NA NA NA
I FACIMIY
1EWBOAH000 0.1 HA kA NA kA 10% 101,101 1 0.10 10 10 10r 11100 S.F. NA NA HA NA NA
OEPY~
1 NA
GENERAL METAL Me NA NA NA kA 10% 1 AY$ ! 1.0 10 NA 10 11100 If, NA NA NA NA
I
eCN00LfFARR Nd NA NA NA N A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10.0 NA NA NA NA
NA
/ARA I/.0 NA NA NA HA NA NA NA NA NA - HA _ NA NA 11.1 NA NA NA - -
NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA
MA10A ROII.e NA NA NA NA A -
NA NA 7HA FNA
COIL COLOR ROri11.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA_ HA_ NA ' NA I NA NA NA
M I Ilea
10 I - _ _~il1,NE r = :~~L_ r f.. 1=°.1..:I~ 1.662
. rA10 H
_ 111 111 `
i
ti
A'[TACW.NT 5
,
I~ 4
J
1 d o o 2 a+:
I a.
I ~1
W 1` 0
v, O
a v
vuf Z` y J
F
IM tO
EO
1O I `
o' L• rw
.f 26,
11
i
PARCEL 18 SF-10 BUFFER ZONE
RMB REALTY ZR~7M
$CAL£: N.T.B. - ra°"wrt lal rarK nw nW
Mn u►i.n r+n uw n
-8
i
i
f ~ f
isb•' • .T♦rw~• •~w•
iZb'
C Im JI Im m OI
~m A O I I O ~ ~I
• I NI ♦ • IN
' I ~ R~ ro ~ ~~k i ~rd. T ~ •
~ 3 k kf ~ 4-1~' 2'gppp -N co
A
I q
a~~,~ s~o W III
O 4 3~ VO o0
t ~P! < I . I~ hl •
N
i
i
s-4
I • I
O i
4 io' a L. io' G.L. PARCEL 18 SF-10 LOT LAYOUT
RMB REALTY '
LZ:/ 2uLZ kww4,pwiSJi"i
SCALE: N.T.S. i• "04 ltwf . KVf Wln nW 44M
iNWMII •.IIW YNII•
1
F. d►p,
pwl
• o's,
W. WK
GNtl ~ • N , i t,
t K- 6 m"
K, 6w 'f
1
' 00
f+
iA
OWN
Tor" 0
® b
b
i
} so
K
Za I~ K
n~ eAs " WY
Svc
.
aoe.
SF= 10 TYPICAL LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
CARTER it BURGESS NC.
HALL N.T.S. Q~ ENGINEERS • rIAN~ERS
n•.r.aw ~nwn ~ w rw n raa n w Hn.
4
r
4L
I II. ,
Fo
• Mpg
m PwT LIJ
I rtj
AAA
ryR. Gw+t. K
K. ~lv $ K. M• MpR M
i
MeR ,/•ll• .l •..r.• . r~•
t.
g eR ® g ~
I
nrt u~ ~ K ~ K ;
eR.
uv
+AAA
o's t~~'Q
SF-7 TYPICAL LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
SCAM N.~.. CARTER A IURGESS INC.
ENGINEERS I PLANKM
~i«r.arpMH..~ r. m1.n we• n.uwrn
- 11 -
i
N
I
I~
0
R l O# R
m Q a
IN t N '
I~ 40' 40'
2 ,
< ,
a .
. Y
N
4 WALK ST PARKING
J
30' 40 10' R
I a ' 1
~ I
(,;':~PATIO HOME CLUSTER LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
:cAllu A SuRGMANc
SCALE: N.T.S. ENGINEiSj9 i F ANNM
,rM r.eMtnru. ~ w rru n .pn. nur wn,
12
V
ATTACHMENT 6
SOUTHVIEW ADDITION
SUBMITTAL/REVIEW SCHEDULE
8-26-88
Submittal to the City of Denton for
Consideration by Planning 6 Zoning
1 Commission and City Council
Transportation Improvements
Plan March 1989
P.D. District Detail Concept
k Plan March 1989
Utility/Drainage Improvements
Plan March 1989
Phase IA - Detail Plan/
Preliminary Plat March 1969
Phase 11 - Detail Plan/
Preliminary Plat January 1991
Phase II - Detail Plan/
Preliminary Plat January 1993
r
i
I
I
1
1
G
C68 No. 7187008001
13 f
`rII
I
1417
I
w
t
SOUTHYIEW ADDITION
` DEVELOPMENT PHASING SCHEDULE
(8-26-88)
X of Site Plan Development
Phase Acreage Tracts Project Submittal/Review Start
IA 164.7 11 thru 14 6 43 March 1989 July 1989
16 thru 18
15 89.1 6 thru 10 6 23 March 1992 July 1992
15
I II 124.9 1 thru 5 34 March 1994 July 1994
378.7 Acres
i
k
l I
I
I
t
i
II
f
I,
M No. !'1$7008001
j
14 -
I
I
ROAD PHASING SCHEDULE
o PHASE IA
TRACTS - 11, 12, 13, 110 16, 17
(sea Fiqurss 5 and 6)
Build Lakeview Blvd. as a two-lane roadway
from I.H. 35E to Meadowlark _
Provide signalitation at=
Lakeview and Z.H. 35E Southbound service Rd
Lakeview and I.H. 35E Northbound Service Rd
Lakeview and Shady Shares
NOTEe A connection between the Southview Development and
Meadowlark Road, just south of Tract 16, will not be made
until Meadowlark s improved to a driveable standard.
{
II
I
Iff
f
r1
1s
3
I
i
I P
i
M
I
rtCAN CAM
COLORADO BLVD,
14
. 12 rrr w....r....~..~-~
16
17
FIGURE d MEND.
Developmental PhASIng ❑ Phan rA
Phase IA Otbw Phu"
• SouthvleW Development
-la -
I
I
N
1
~ MWV, 110
LAKE
LEWISYILLE
uCKINMeV
I
moon
V
1
i
M QOLd1A00
I
LEGEND: ski O ~y±,t'
Road tmprowm4at 1
St=all ` rout e,a„e!
FIGUMe a a
Dovelopmontal Phaalnq
Phe" I A
Improvomont>s s
j
r
17
M
i
is
I
. PHASE IB
TRACTS - 6, 71 8, 9, 10, 15
(see Figures 7 and 8)
i _
- Build Lakeview Boulevard as a four-lane,
divided roadway from I.H. 35E to the
northern boundary of Tracts 5 and 7
HOTEL Colorado will be built as a minimum of two lanes from
Lakeview Boulevard to Tract 7.
i
i
i
i
t
7
k
f
t
t
- 18
I
N
I
i
PECAN CREEK
COLORADO BLVD.
6
10 9 8
15
g
9
~l
f
FIGURE 7 LEGEND:
Dovoiopmontol Phooing pt 1~
Phooo Id
8outhvlow Dovolopmont ~othn ph""
- 19 -
I
ti
t
MW Y. 3ia
r
E
1rJ
` 61 A00 - V
>E
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
ueKiNN4Y MILL S
MORN
R~
y~
i
I
i
OOLOwRDO
LEGEND: rt
Road Iroprowmeel '
i
F1GURE 8
Developmental Phasing
Phase 1 B
Improvements
- 20 -
i
I
J
• PHASE II
TRACTS - 1, 2, 3, 41 5
(see Figures 9 and 10)
- Extend Lakeview Boulevard as a four-lane,
divided roadway from Tract 5 and 7 to
Pecan Creak
- Build Meadowlark as a four-lane, divided
roadway from Lakeview Boulevard to I.H. 35E
- Construct right-turn lanes at:
Lakeview and Meadowlark, westbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Y.K. 35E Northbound Service
Road, southwastbound to northwestbound
- Construct left-turn lanes at:
Lakeview and Z.H. 35E Southbound Service
Road, southeastbound to northeastbound
- Widen I.H. 35E overpass at Lakeview Boulevard
to 5 lanes
i
i
i
-21
-
r
V
PECAN CN!!%
2
wwwwwwwwwwww 3
COLONA00 ILVO.
5
i
ix c
WAMWJ
QI~
FIGURE 9 LEGEND.
Dsvslopmsntsl Phsslnp ❑ phm It
Phsss II odwr Phu"
• Southvlsw Dsvslopmsnt
-22 -
f
Mwr ~w
s
d
•LAOO
h
LAKE
LEWMILLE
WLLf
u~xiNNEr
.1
110A at w~
COI
5
OOLCOAM
LEOE N D: ° rjttr~~;
Road improvamaal
Tura Lao*
h '
.
FIGURE 10
Developmental Phasing
ph$" 11
improvements '
-23-
~ T
N
• Build the bridge over Pecan Creek
• PHASE ZIIA
TRACTS - 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37$ 8, 39, 40, 41
(see Figures 11 and 12)
- Extend and widen Lakeview to six-lanes from
I.H. 35E to the northern and of Tract 33
-
Provide signalization at:
Lakeview and Colorado
- Construct right-turn lanes ats -
Lakeview and McKinney, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and I.H. 35E Northbound Servica
Road, northwestbound to northeastbound
- Construct left-turn lanes at:
Lakeview and McKinney, northbound to
westbound
Widen I.H. 35E overpass at Lakeview Boulevard
I to 7 lanes
NOTES McKinney Street (F.M. 426) is assumed to be built to
the designated thoroughfare standard of four lanes, divided.
NOTEI Signalization and widening to a five lane section of
Meadowlark Road at I.H. 35E is assumed.
I ~
t
-24-
1
i
bil
/IAOO
15
23
18
I
MILLS
19
22/ -
000P111 '
28/ CIIIIK
30
32
31
yaXI"A q
re 5 8
/ 3
37~ a, 40
39 X41
PICAM CKIIK. AKIVIIW
ILVO. LEOEND:
FIGURE 11 ❑ Phan IIfA
Developmental Phasing
Phase IIIA OV*r Pham
` Lakeview Development
-25 -
r
NLAOO ~
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
We MIMNIY WLL7 w~~~
MCA
.~4f .
. wK
1 -900
00,
0OIeRAOO
LB 08 NIN
ii
Read taaorowmost
Turf Lass "4;p
Sl~aa1
Brldla
woY r,ar1
FIGURE 12
DOv01opm6ntal Phasing
Ph*" III A
` Improvements
-26-
I
f
e PHASE IIIB
TRACTS - 27, 281 291 30, 31
(see Figures 13 and 14)
Extend Lakeview Boulevard from Tract 33 to
Tract 22 as a six-lane, divided roadway
Construct right-turn lanes ati
Loop 288 Bypass and I.H. 35E Northbound
Service Rd, southbound to northwest-
bound
Loop 288 Bypass and I.H. 35E Southbound
Service Rd, northbound to southeast-
bound
E
{
i
i
i
_27_
'N ~ • 3y 0 •,.t i.
H
ILA60
15
23
18
wlllt '
19
22/
27 °~~~lot
28
30 29
32
31 36
M•K,kN33' 38
37/ 40
39 41
/QCAM Cllllx bUY„w LEOE".
FIGURE 13 aYQ. r-1
Dsrslopmsnial Phasing LJ PbsM ttt6
Ph&" 1119 Otau P1ura
Loksvlew Dsvslopmsnt
_28_
I
i
I
~I
I
KW Y. ISO yFPO~7
SL AGO
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
M<R IN/1l r WLL S
I
f
I MOAN
I
I
OOLOAAOO
LEGEND:
• f
Road Improvamaar
Tura Liao
FIGURE 14
Dowlopmontd ph&$Ing
Rhs" III a
` Improvements
-29-
ti
J
I
e Build the bridge over Cooper Creek
e PHASE IVA
TRACTS - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, S, 90 11, 1S,
19, 20, 210 22, 23
(see Figures 15 and 16)
- Extend Lakeview as a six-lane, divided
roadway from Tract 27 to U.S. 380
- Provide signalization att
Mayhill and Blagg
Mayhill and Mills
Lakeview and Blagg
Lakeview and Mills
Lakeviaw and F.M. 426
- Construct right-turn lanes ati
Lakeview and U.S. 380, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and McKinney, southbound to
wastbound
Lakeview and Colorado, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and Meadowlark, westbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Shady Shores, southbound to
westbound
Construct left-turn lanes ati
Lakeview and U.S. 380, westbound to
southbound
Lakeview and MoKinney, eastbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Colorado, eastbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Meadowlark, southbound to
eastbound i
NOTEi McKinney Street and Mayhill Road are assumed to be
built to their designated thoroughfare standards.
NOTES Mills Road and Blagg Road are assumed to be driveable.
Future study may be required if they are not in an acceptable
state for motor vehicle use. I
t
-30-
. r ~
ISO
6
98T9
3, I 1
ItA00
15
23
K
f
•
18 20 n
NfIU 2
19
22/ -
000PIK
28, CIIttK
30
32
31
4,. 33~ 36
w,M~t 38
37/ 40
39 41
PICAN CKI/K AKIVIRW LEGEND!
IIVD,
FIQIlF~$ 1!f ❑ Phan IVA
Developmental Phasing
Phase IVA Other Phues
Lakeview Development
31 -
r ,
J ~ O O
LAKE
►rLLS J` ll
ucKINNIr mw~mk LEWISVILLE
MOM
y~
0
r CCIAAADp
LEGEND: ~t
Road Iroprowment
Turn Lna
Slsnatl Gov
15lJ
Bridge
FIGURE 10
Developmental PhOSOO
. Phase IV A
Improvements _ 32 -
WPM V_
s PHASE IVB
TRACTS - 120 13, 140 15, 16, 17, 24, 25, 26 and
all remaining tracts
(see Figures 17 and 18)
- Construct right-turn lanes at:
*Mayhill and McKinney, northbound to
eastbound, southbound to wastbound
Loop 288 and I.H. 35E Northbound
Service Rd, northwestbound to
northeastbound
- Construct left-turn lane at:
*Mayhill and McKinney, westbound to
southbound
NOTE: If the bridge across I.H. 35E is not widened, than
additional studies should be submitted prior to advancing in
the sequencing scheme.
NOTE: If Loop 288 Bypass is not built, there would not be any
major impact on the transportation system caused by the
Southview and Lakeview developments.
* prior to the development of each tract of land, a detailed
plan, meeting the requirements oP Article 11 of Appendix B-
Zoning of the Code of ordinances, shall be submitted for City
Council approval, after recommendation is made thereon by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. Concurrent with the
submission of the first such detailed plan, a Transportation
Improvement Plan addressing these specific traffic
improvements necessary to servo this entire phase of
development, without altering the'improvements associated
with Lakeview Boulevard, shall also be submitted and
approved.
- 33 -
__t r A
1
: lic
BLA00
!3 2 lk~ _
15
16 14 23
17
17
IS 25 t,
YELL. ,26
f1 19
22~
COMA
28/ CAM
30
f 32
31
36
•~,xN33/ 38
37/ 40
39
41 LEGEND:
PICAN CA91K AKIy111!!
BLVD. Phase [VH
FIGURE 17 OtW Ph&w4
Dsvslopmsntal Phasing
Phase IVO
Lakeview Dsvstopmsnt
-34-
a
1
4
HWY, f~0
aLAGO
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
wcKINNEY - Loin!
` r
MORN
f
COLOMADO
LEGEND: o- I
h Tura Lane
x Ta be Determined Later y
F Omar a" s
r
rII
FIGURE 1$
Dfvelopmontrl phasing
• ph@" IV
0
ImprovOment•
-35-
i
ATTACHMENT 7 J• t
f }
T`
+ MN',
K
1.~
~•f ' '1n. Y'I
Jv 2 •'•r .a
ll ~ V1♦
V•j ,1 Y
3.',
~j.
all
:4( r
w 11 .a
♦fLCf--_ J
T f 'I, 1
I19 ,f It
1 • kp l
1 '
n rr,.r... n.... N r.
unJrv ~xr~r. 1d
BOUTHVIEW
O.•1.. 01...EM.• R.TY•I.MrM!
_ Ir, ~_n~r, ,W N41.:y lJ.. !•11.MN•6
• ~ 36 ~ n rr. • •wu JI'. err
Y.h eM.. M•...N Il. N. lefA, Y T.~
• MI..e•y V. n>I NM.1
Mti 4, !.Y*OrnIN
4.11.2 0
ATTACHMENT 8
INTENSITY ANALYSIS
Land Use Acreage Intensity Factor TD/AC
SF-10 93.4 31 2,988.8
SF-7 209.4 43 9,004.2
Cluster 10.6 80 848.0
MF 16.0 200 3,200.0
NS 6.0 650 3,900.0
Community Facility 3.0 85 255.0
GR 12.0 650 7,800.0
School/Park 10.0 85 850.0
Park 18.0 30 540.0
Total 29,386.0
Intensity Calculation
Intensity Standard (414.9 ac x 75 td/ac) 310117.5
Proposed Intensity 250386.0
Unallocated Intensity 16731.5
i
l 61 under intensity standard
F
I
i
2205]
-37-
I
i
ATTACHMENT 9
LAND.USE SUMMARY
Z-1861
Single family (less than 12 u/a)
Total acres 313.4
Total units 1,282.0
Density 4.1 u/a
Multi - Fa i1y
Total acres 16.0
Total units 400.0
Lensity 25.0 u/a
Total Residential
Total acres 329,4
Total units 1,682.0
Total density 5.1 u/a
1
f
i
j Land Use lc re A
SF-10 Percentage
SF-'I 93.4
Cluster 209.4 23
23
MF 10.6 3
NS 16.0 4
Community Facility 6.0 1
GR 3.0
School/Park 12.0 1
Park 10.0 3
Right-Of-May 1810 2
36.5 4
9
414.9 100
i
220sj
- 38 -
j
F
SOUTHVIEW LAND USE
Z-1861
Land Use Acreage Percentage
SF-10 93.4 23
l SF-7 209.4 s0
II Cluster 10.6 3
MF 16.0 4
NS 6.0 1
Community Facility 3,0 1
GR 12,0 3
School/Park 10.0 z
Park 18.0
Right-Of-Way 36.5 9
414.9 1001
220sj
4
I
M '
i
single re nilY 4%leS.T■m12y
73%----~
F_o4cctice/cea pecan
'h ~igne-ot•x■y
elio Use
I~ . 7%
Mo rats cenaley
Includes Community facilities
.39
1
I
4
952L /
ATTACHMENT 10
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONI4G DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR
EREIN, FROMY AG17.1 RICULTURAL O(A DISTRICT OCLASSIFICAN PARTICULARLY TO DESCRIBED
DEVELOPMENT (PD) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the sonlng district classification of the property
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
byy reference, is hereby changed from agricultural (A) district
classificatLon to planned development (PD) district classification.
SECTION II.
That pprior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for
the use of any building or structure within the planned development
district the following conditions shall be met:
1. Perimeter street paving requirements shall be
imposed along the entire frontage of Paige Road.
2. Estate road conditions will be imposed on Swisher
Road-a pavement width of twenty-four (24) feet
without curbs is allowed for one sere lots with one
hundred (100) feet or more frontage for single
family use.
7. A six (6) foot solid fence will be erected along the
south bboundary line of this development where it
abuts Shiloh Cemetery.
SECTION Itt.
That the planned development district shall be developed in
substantial compliance with the site plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
` for the purpose of promoting the ggeneral welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for Its peculiar
suttabltty or particulr uses, and with a view to consetvtng the
( value ofl the buildingsa, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maxtmum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its c Wtens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
Immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been hold by the Planning and Zoning
2-1694/CVRTIS D. HODGSON/PAGE I
_40_
n
i
N
I
i
"mission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
afar giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the ~ driy of 66f~ 1984.
-7 5T
CIT OF D ON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:..O, "M rvr
I
i
i
i 1 1
E`
ri
V
i
i
i
I
i
Z•1694/CURTIS D. MODGSON/PACE 2
4l-
- I
f ~
soo
.
OAT.i
- T,rsl Gnn. Ore. y
Tung S•' l ,n
retanrT..ul E,rir° li.t+
I I1
pon,l f+f R.sonnnn P-)nd I
ROtii' 0°dicui,~n
i
.2' r 'I •AL'•r ark IAH•~.~~'•
Y ~ 7LMh
~ y
'i
~.w ~ C°rpTll
ROLLINGWOOD
ESTATES
; A Addmoe to the Cityot Osnron,T°sa°
/f
0°r°idglfr /
AwGP,1N C. ,
3336 Uph+ Ad
Calks, Tstas '3440 -
COAMCr: Curris Hodssorr
:11 460•I791
Z-1694/CURTIS D. HODCSOR/PACE 4
r
i
I
l
- 42
EXHISIT "A" k.t,,~y lY
;U8YE408'S MOTES
To all that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Gideon Walker
Surrey. Ab. No. 1330, is the County of Denton, Taste and being more particularly
described as follows'
6tGINNINO at an iron rod to at near the center line of Page land at the Northeast
corner of a 160 acre tract conveyed to Kra. Martha Thurman by John A. Henrys
17@KE South 87 degrees 53 minutes 19 seconds fist alone or near the center line
of Pep Need a distance of 1, 172.20 test to a true. rod for cornert
77LpIC8 South 03 degrees 02 minutes 39 Woods West varying from the fast aide of
Swisher good and back to the approximate tenter line of Swisher load a distance
of 1,090.31 feet to a nail for angle point in or near the intersection of Swisher
Mad and Chspperel Drivel
171M South 01 degree 11 minutes 18 seconds West sloag or near the center line
of Mahar goad a distance of 1, 148.87 feet to a point for corner at the Morthesst
corner of Shiloh G"ateryl
TH MC= North 86 degrees 41 minutes 15 Woods West aeons or nest s fence a distance
of 137.00 fast with the North line of Shiloh Cemetery to a pout for corners
TWO along a curve to the left havia8 a tastral angle of 70 degrees 50 minutes.
31 monde, m radlas of 290.00 fast, a tangent of XG.23 fast a chord bearing of
North 21 degnem 33 minutes 43 seconds West, and a chord length of 336.16 test to
a point fair cornerl
TIODICII North 14 degrees 35 minutes $3 monde Eat a distance of 77.61 fast to a
point for corserl
TMPJICE North 04 degrees 58 abut" 11 Woods Let a distance of 46.17 fast to
_ an angle Poistl
THEE North a distance of 28.50 feet to e.4 angle Pointe
TfRm North 11 degrase 22 minutes 17 Woods Hest ■ distance of 91.29 fast to
as wale polatt
17~ICL North 04 degrees 05 minutes 08 seconds West • distance of 28.07 fast to
an angle Poimtl
Tim ICL North 02 delves" 29 minutes 11 monde Etat a distance of 69.07 fast to
a point of curveturst
17?M3 stag a curve to the left having a caatral sagla of 56 degrsus 36 minutes
31 estoada, a radius at 123.00 feet, a tangent of 63.70 fast, a chord bearing of
North 14 dope" 31 adautee West, am a chord length of 115.69 test to a point
for corarl
1
IApIC! North 06 degrees 10 aim" ten 37 seconds West s distance of 309,13 feet to
64 in" putt
i784eCt North 06 degrees 06 minutes $6 seconds Vest a distance of 28.16 fast to
as aegis paints
'•1694/CvRTIS D. H0DG50t1lPAGE 5
43-
I
T W
Tt0M North a distanc^ .41.00 feet to as ends poser-
T1fl71Ci North 10 degrees 04 ads"44 30 ascssda fist a distaau of 91.41 feat to
u Mesh point!
TOM North 01 degrees 11 miaut" 37 wands East a distaaa of 44.01 fast to
a Sallit poieth
TTlM North 03 degrees S5 minutes 53 wands Vest a distance of 77.41 fast to
a point for corners
THCOM along a curve to the right having a central an 1s of 46 degrees 43 slautsa
37 second, a radius of 64.00 feat, a tangent of 64.21 feat, a :fiord !oaring of
North 43 degrees 13 minutes 37 seconds Vest end a chord length of 93.36 fast
to a point of rover" curvaturel
11VfICS aloes a curve to the left having a castral ogle of 32 degrees 49 suites,
a radius of 13.00 feet, tangent of 7.43 feets a chord Aasrins of North 12 degrees
39 minutes 31 socoads Wet, and a chord lsogth of 11,34 feet to a point of teagsaclr
aTD71Ci North 21 degrees IS miautea 06 seconds Wet a dtetaoce of 11.31 fat to
s point of curvatural
T}lZfICE 21008 a curve to the right having a tarsal mile of 76 degrees 19 aioutss
22 seconds, s radius of 67.00 feet, a tasgpat of 31.00 fast, a cbwA hearing of
North 14 degrees 33 minutes 10 "roods 3M. aN s chord distaacs at 80.32 feet
to a point of tansoec7l
TRM North 70 Ngr as 36 minutes. 34 seconds seat a distaste of 37.23 foot to
as "$Is poist$
1fIDICS North 77 degrees 39 other" 19 woods seat a diataeeo of 44.03 feet to
a point of esrveturol
T1~ICS dohs a curve to the Left he" a central node of 74 degrees 19 minutes
20 wands, a radius of 170.0 taato a tsrsmot of 124.66 feet, a chord tssrin
of North 39 degrw 16 mi"nt" 11 sate" asst, and a chord distant. of 203.39
toot to a point of taasaat7l
TTff U North 03 degrees 29 attest" 37 @"adds east s distance of 113.13 feet to
a point for corners
TMMS North 67 degrooa 33 miset" 19 wands Vast a dlstuce of 972.20 feet
to a point for comas!
TV= North % dssrsoa East a distance of 143.00 feet to the POINT Of BEGINNING
and enclosing is all 17.1 acres, more of Idea.
i
~t
h
z
2.1694/CnTIS 0. NOOGSON/PAGE 6
-44-
1
l
I
V
I
953L
ATTACHMENT 11
NO.
TO ORDINANCE FORENAI CHANGE THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
APPROXIMATELY 49.41 ACRES OF LAND, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN, FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATZ04 TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (PD) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the coning district classification of the property
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference, to hereby changed from agricultural (A) district
classification to planned development (PD) district classification.
SECTION It.
That ptior to LF,e issuance of any certificate of occupancy for
the use of any building or structure within the planned development
district the following conditions shall be met:
1. Street widths within the development oust be thirty-one
(3l) feet.
2. Proposed street alignments must be approved by the City
Transportation En inner and final approval of parking
shall be reviewed ~y the Development Review Committee.
3. Perimeter street paving requirements along the entire
scoots • of Shady Shores Road (dedication by develuoer
of fifty (50) feat of right-of-way) shall be imposed
during the platting process.
4. An eight (8) foot masonry/wood (once must be erected j
along the southern property line on Shady Shores Road.
5. 'roes shall be planted :vary twenty (20) feet along the
eaatern and northern boundaries of the property between
this proposal and the proposed SF-7 and one acre estate
lots.
6. Setbacks shall be as follows:
Front: fifteen (15) feet
Rear: can (lO) feet
We: six (6) feet.
7- Maximum lot coverage allowed will be forty (40) percent.
8. No building, dwelling, structure, or fences shall be
built or placed on a lot without the approval of the
Hoe:owners' Association.
9. Any dwellin which is erected or placed on a lot shall
contain at east 900 square feet of living space, shall
have a roof with at least a 3/12 pitch, shall have a
shingle roof (no metal or gravel), and shall have wood
or masonry exterior (no metal).
Z-16951CL'RTIS D. HODGSON/PAGE 1
45-
I
i
N
I
i
10. Any dwelling which is erected or placed on a lot shall:
(a) be set at a distance of not more than twenty-five
(25) feet and not lees than fifteen (1S) feet from
the street unless such placement is impossible due
to utility easements; and
permanently attached to a oncrete foundation;
(b) and
(c) material which is ircolor-coordinated un with ththe
dwelling. She exact placement of any dwelling or
building on any lot shall first be approved by the
Homeowners, Association.
11. All lots will be landscaped with grass shrubs, trees,
decorative stone, bark or other material designed for
landscaping- The landacaping shall ■t all times be
maintained, which maittenanee shall include:
(a) regular mowing and watering of grass;
(b) raking leaves;
(c) trimming trees and shrubs;
(d) edging along road, concrete and shrub bide;
(e) trimming ■long buildings; and
(f) sweeping and elesning walks ■nd drives.
12. No trash, debris, auto parts tools, equipment,
vehicles, bicycles, or toys shall be kept on any lot
within view cf the street or within view of adjacent
property.
13. No antenna may be installed on any lot which extends
for more than fifteen (15 )feet above the dwelling.
14. No person may live on or about any lot for more than
thirty (30) days in any twelve 12) month period
unlsss said parson is the owner of t e lot or a member
of the immediate family of the owner of the lot. No
renting
15. All structures on any lot shall be kept in good repair.
16. Any fence constructed on any lot shall be of wood or
masonryy, shall not exceed six (6) feet in height, and
shall be no closer than thirty (30) feet to the street.
U. No towels rugs or laundry shall be hun on or about
any lot in suclk a manner that is visille from the
street.
i
Yg. No more than two (2) fous•legged pets say be kepi on
any tot. The owner of each lot shall keep his pate on
his property and shall insure that the pas stay off
of the common areas.
19. If steps are required to enter the dwelling and the
steps are visible from the street, than the steps must
2.1695/CURTIS D. HODCSON/PACE 2
46-
1
be made of concrete or ?agonry. Alternatively, a
wooden deck arrangement may be used which has as part
of its structure steps which are made of wood, provided
that the deck has at least 80 square feet of floor
area and provided, further, that tha deck arrangement
be built in a good workmanlike manner with materials
designed for outside use. Otherwise, no wooden steps
are permitted.
20. The owner of each lot, his family, and his guests
shall at all times comply with these covenants ana
restrictions, and shall likewise comply with all rules
which the Hameuwnere' Association adapts.
I SECTION III.
That the planned development district shall be developed in
substantial compliance with the site plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that s.ch change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the moral welfare of the City of
Denton, Taxes, and with reasonabis consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
■uitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the building,, protecting human live , and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commie ioa sad the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the AL day of 1984.
f
C[7 OF D~ ON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
AL LL 0
14 CITY SL(;KLTART
CITY OF DENTON,#TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LECAL FORM:
.10E D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
6Y:A.i4. ^M
Z-1695/CURTIS 0. HODGSON/PAGE 3
47-
i
I
ti
I
f ' oa
77-
R44 rimes l.M tl at
NiM1 Lm A4rn N'
/ $aa r win'
r ~i tq NAGS Of Sit$ f404
c,mm.M Han tot
wil "00
froA
Jam-
. is
r_ ~1~ ,y._ fib.. ~
04090690 NO
► A& ROLLI\G«'OOD I
I aA»r.,,
1 ESTATES
G
R%GP. I%G ~n I~wm.Mromn't. nOrnn.n Y.. r. I
ItNC1. ' } f
1170 .~I/nt
71
I OaIIrllrntafl7/0
I.M1'tMno", ,
Z-1693/CUR1'1S D. HODOSON/PAnt 6
i
i
i
-48 -
1
f
E.KFIBtT "A"
SURVEYOR'S NOTES ~
To all that certain tract or parcel of land situated is the Gideon Walker
Survey, Ab. No. 13300 in the County of Denton, Texas end botnI more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron rod in or moor the center line of Peg• Road at the Northoast
corner of a 160 acre tract conveyed to Mrs. Martha Thurman by John R. Henry:
THENCE South 81 degrees 33 minutes 19 seconds East along or near the center line
of Page Road I distance of to 172.20 feet to an iron rod for corner;
THENCE South 03 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds West varying from the East side of
Swisher POad and back co the approximate center line of Swisher load a distance
of 1,090.31 feet to a nail for angle point in or near the intersection of Swisher
Road and Chapperal Drive:
THENCE South 01 degree 21 sinutas le seconds West along or near the center line
of Swisher to 64 a distance of 1, 168.87 feet to a point for corner at the Northeast
corner of Shiloh Cemoteryl
THENCE North 66 degress sE sfnutes 13 seconds West along or near a fames a distance
of 131.00 lest with the North line of Shiloh Cemetery to a point for corner:
TN'.NCE along a curve to the left having s central an l• of 70 degrees 50 minutes,
32 seconds, a radius of 290.00 feet, a tangent of 206.23 feet a chord bearing of
North 22 degrees 33 minutes 43 seconds West, and a chord length of 336.16 feet to
a point for corner;
!HENCE North la degrees 33 minutes 53 seconds East s distance of 77.62 feet to a
point for corner:
THENCE North 06 degrees 38 minutes 11 seconds East a distance of 66.17 feet to
in angle point:
THENCE North a distance of 28.50 foot to an angle point:
THENCE North It degrees 22 minutes 17 seconds West a distance of 91.29 foot to
in eagle point:
THENCE North 04 degrees OS minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 28.01 feu to
an angle point;
THENCE North 02 degrees 29 minutes 22 seconds east a distance of 69.01 feet to
a point of curvature;
THENCE along a curve to the left having a control smile of 56 doiroes 36 minutes
3: seconds, a radius of 122.00 last, a tangent of 63,70 lest, a chord bearing of
North U degrees 31 minutes West, and ■ chord length of 113.69 feet to a point
for cornart
THENCE North 08 doorses 10 minutes 57 seconds West a dista..t o' 309.15 foot to
sa finite pointl
THENCE North 06 degrees 06 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 26.16 feet to
am angle point:
2-1693/Ct1ATIS D. RODCSON/?ACE 5
- 49 -
I
;
EXHIBIT "A"
THENCE North a distance of 17.00 fat to an angle points
T7ff11Ct North 10 degrees 04 ;nuts 50 seconds Wt a distance of 91.41 feet to
an angle polar,..
THENCE North 01 degrees 11 minutes 31 "con" rest o distance of 16.01 feet to
an angle pointI
THENCE North 05 debase 55 minutes 53 seconds West a distance of 77.61 feet to
a point for cornett
THENCE ♦lcal a curve to trio right having a central sn le o! 66 dyrsa 43 minutes
37 seconds, a radius of 66.00 feet. a tangent of 64.2 feat, a chord baring of
North 43 degrees 13 minutes 52 seconds West and a chard length of 93.36 fat
to a point of reverse curvature;
THENCE along ■ curve to the left having a control angle of 52 degrees 49 minutes,
a radlu; of 15.00 feet, a tangent of 7.65 feet, a chord bearing of North 12 degrees
59 clnutom 31 seconds West, and a chard length of 13,31 test to a point of tangency;
TKENCf North 21 degree 15 minutes 06 seconds West • distance of 19.31 feet to
a point of curvatures
THENCE along a curve to the rl`ht having a control to le of 76 dynes 19 minutes
22 seconds, a radius of 63.00 feet, a tangent of $1.06 fat, a chard beerinl of
North 18 degrees 53 minutes 10 seconds rest, and a chord distance of 60.32 fat
to a point of tanleecls
THENCE North 10 degree 36 minutes 54 seconds rest a distance of 51.25 feet to
an angle point,
THENCE North 77 degrees 59 minutes 19 setondo test a distance of 66.05 feet to
a point of curvatures
THMACt stool a curve to the teft having a central angle of 74 degrees 19 minutes
20 seconds, a radius of 110.0 feet, a tangent of 126.86 feet, a chord 6e arit
of North 39 degrees 16 minutes 11 seconds east, and a chord distance of 205.18
feet to a point of tenlencll
THENCE North 03 degrees 29 alautss 57 seconds rest a distance of 315.13 feat to
a point for corner,
THENCE North 87 degrees 53 minutes 19 seconds West ■ distinct of 912.20 feet
to a point for corner,
THENCE South 02 degrees West a diew" of 2,166.12 fat to a pout for cornett
TH1SICt along a curve to the right having a central an to of 12 dasrses 10 minutes,
13 seconds, a radius of 2,911.79 feet, ■ length of 621.53 fat a chord bearing of
South 37 degree 09 minutes S9 seconds rest, and a chord distance of 621.37 fast
to a point for corners j
TN11N:1 South 66 degrees 49 minutes 11 seconds rest a distance of $85.27 feat
with the North right-of-ray of Shady Shotee load to a point for corns n
TlfE'ICI North 00 degree 23 minutes 01 seconds Wet a distance of 126.10 feet co
a point for corners
THENCE South 86 degrees 41 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 68.44 feet to the
POINT 01 BEGINNING and enclosing in all 69.41 acres of lead.
2.1695/CURTIS D. HODGSONIPACE 6
- 5 0-
ATTACHMENT 12
KVlY. %S0
u.
1 4 a a
60 u0 we
1 OR OR MF U
OFF' T e U I
7e
IN MF 116o r_
SF-A 11
S 0d 4~.t
NB
I 4a CL~a PARK
1 Ott 1s
1a 14
&F-A. 2s
1! SF-! as4 NS
40
F- P)"
$11 1a F-! SF-!
' ao PARK 11 1a Fj
CL-8 to Ono,
Mf
SCHIPARK 40.1t 1 s♦
PARK :S NSF-10
M~
s! 40
8 0
SF-10 raS OF-10
s0
li w r1
4 a1
CL'S +r1
is
PARK
SF-A 4.0
ss s a.•a
OR +r
10 O
OR so OFF
so 5.0
1 60 MF 41 *OFF
MF u a
LAKEVIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
-51 -
l
I
ATTACHMENT 13
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Z-88.013 and Z•1861
Prior to any discussion about a project called Lakeview, the City
of Denton annexed 47U acres of property from U.S. Highway 380 south
toward McKinney Street Lake following Trinity Road
Ordinance 84-9the 8 waspadoptedgby
Weer property along ong
the City Council to annex the property in order to control develop-
ment on the 470 acres, because the property owners at the time had
resi-
as lands uses for the aarea.
dential informed the esustaff that bdivisions mwereeprhome oposedparks
In 1985 Miller of Texas, Inc., now RMB Realty, Inc, requested
annexation of 304.5 acres located along Trinity Road and Lake
Lewisville and extending from north of Mills Road to south of
McKinney Street. In November of 1985, following annexation of tied
304.9 acres by Ordinance 85-210, a zoning application
to the City of Denton for creation of a planned development zoning
district. A public hearing on Z-1779 was conducted by the Planning
and Zoning Commission on December 4, 1985, and the Commission recom-
mended approval by a 3 to 2 vote. The City Council held a public
hearing on January 7, 1986 but tabled the zoning request (Z-1779)
order to review addthe°Councilorecommendedttheepreparation,of9an
City Council meeting,
ordinance changing the zoning to the planned development zoning
Planned adopted Developmenth126ouncil on January 6,
district.
Ordinance the property 97-008 was
1987 zoning
In March of 1986, following to City Counfoi cil public hearinplanned
recommendation on Z-1779, applications
development zoning district and annexing 66.001 acres were submit-
ted. The annexation of property at the northetheedgey of Z-1779 and
extending to U.S. Highway 380 was approved by (Ordinance
86-140) but the zoning aePl~cation was siwithdrawn by the petitioner
prior to public hearing y
in the area now identified as'Southview, several annexations i.
Included
and zoning requests have occurred. In 1984, 66.5 acres at the south- r
west corner of Pockrus and Swisher roads was annexed by the City
(Ordinance 84.97). A zoning request was submitted for a manufactured
housing subdivision in conjunction with the annexation; however, the
City Council denied the request in September of 1984. Following the
andplanned
dental, requests to along create PockrusORoadacre
estateelotspalongdSwisher
for Single Family-
Road (PD-88) and to create a 49.41 acre Qg(lanned development district
for a manufuca`he e requests houingisubdivisionoM- 84) were submitted. The
City approve
52-
Background Information
Z-d8-013 and Z-1861
Page 2
In 1986, the City annexed 132.64 acres owned by the Corps of Engi-
neers which abutted the soutiiern edge of the Lakeview development.
Miller of Texas, now %MB Realty, Inc, submitted a request for annexa-
tion and zoning to the planned development zoning district on 299.83
acres. While the annexation was approved by Ordinance 86-130, the
petitioner requested withdrawal of the zoning consideration prior to _
public hearing.
In September of 1986. the staff began working with a new team of
representatives including individuals from Carter and Burgess and
Miller of Texas, now RMB Realty, Inc., to revise the Lakeview con-
cept plan and zone additional property owned by RMB Realty, Inc.
Prior to this date, the City had not dealt directly with the owners
of the property. On June 5, 1987, some nine months after the first
discussion with the new team, two applications for zoning were sub-
mitted. One application for planned development zoning on 837 acres,
Inrludiag the existing planned development, was submitted and later
r,,vised to 867,8 acres which included an additional 30.2 acres for a
school/park site. The other application was submitted for planned
development zoning on 414,9 acres including PD-88 and PD-89.
After a year long review and negotiation process, a public hearing
was scheduled before the Planning and Zoning Commission at Its meet-
ing of June 7, 1988. The Commission unanimously denied the Lakeview
request stating among other reasons that the zoning request violated
the intensity by 17 percent and the density of the request was 9.49
units per acre. The petitioner requested that the Southview zoning
request be withdrawn prior to the public hearing.
The two zoning proposals were revised to address some concerns of
the Commission and were submitted for consideration at the Commis-
sion meeting of July 27, 1988. The Lakeview request was.recommended
for approval, and the Southview request was tabled until the
September 14, 1988 agenda. The Southview zoning case was tabled at
the request of RMB Realty, Inc. in order to provide time to revise
the concept plan and to address concerns of the adjacent property
owners. The Commission held a public hearing on September 14, 1988
to review a revised concept plan and recommended approval.
i
i
r
1517x
9/28/88
53.
ATTACHMENT 14
lit4hLODIhNY' GuIllh
4 L1
o Intensity
Z-b8-U13
Moderate center at U.S. Highway 3au 9% over standard
171 over proportionate
snare
Moderate center at McKinney Street U1 over standard
91 under proportionate
share
Low Intensity Area 16% under standard
233 under proportionate
share
Overall project intensity 51 under standard
Z-1861
Low Intensity Area 61 under standard
68 under proportionate
share
Overall project intensity 61 under standard
o Concentration of Multifamily
Z-88-013 Conforms with policies
Z-1861 Conforms with policies
o Separation of multifamily concerntrations (1/2 mile or 2,640 feet)
Z-88-U13 Conforms within project
Z-1861 Conforms within project E
Tracts 39 and 41 of Z-88-013 and Tract 3 of Z-1861 are located
2,100 feet apart.
i
o Concentration of non-residential land uses in low intensity areas
Z-88.013 Conforms with policies
Z-1861 Conforms with policies
except Tract 6 is 12 acres
f
" See pages 19 and 22 for calculations r
- 54 -
uerri~y WCUL uuluC r...i~~r~
Page Z
o Separation of non-residential land uses (112 mile or 2,640 feet)
Z-88-013 Conforms with pclicies
except Tract 15 is 1,700
feet south of moderate
area
Z-1861 Conforms with policies
o Diversity and Protection of Housing
Z-88-013 Conforms with policies
Specific land uses
provided separately
Z-1861 Conforms with policies
Specific land uses
provided separately
I
j i
I
I
t
II
I
55 - j~
f
i
f
ATTACHMENT 15
SUMMARY
I
o intensity Standard (D1nt8onoDeevelo ment Guide)
Existing zoning S~ under
Proposed Lakeview
Proposed Southview 61 under
o Density (units per acre)
Existing Lakeview Plan: 16.0 u/a Proposed Lakeview Plan: 7,2 u/a"
5,1 u/a
Proposed Southview Plan: area density 5.3 u/a
*overall density 7.2 u/a - Low intensity are
o Public Use (Percentage of Development)
Existing Lakeview plan: 41 Proposed Lakeview plan: gl
Proposed Southview Plan: 61
o Parks and Schools
pp dedicated in existing plan:
Pro M acres total and $ZS0,000 payment
(8.4 acres parks and 22.6 acres schools)
Proposed Lakeview
eks P`anb(Z do8-013):
64,5 acres p donated
and school sites to be negotiated
Proposed Southview plan (Zl);
28.0 acres donated for parks
includes 10 acres for joint school/parker too dwelling units
Park land dedication standard 6f acres
1 ac p
Existing zoning (PD-126) 9 44 acres
Proposed Lakeview (Z-88-013)- 17 aacr~S - g2.S acres
Propcsed Southview (2.1861}
Dedicated in Lakeview/Southview (with schools) elation
park land dedication standard of 3 acres per 1,000 population
Existing toning (PD-126) - 96 acres }
Proposed Lakeview (Z-88-013) - 36 acres
Propposed Southview (2-1861) - 1S acres - 92 5 acres
Dedicated in Lakeview/Southview (with schools)
l
f
1197k _ 56 -
f
h
I
I
J
t
i
~OUTNVIEW
'i
i
Recommended
Proposal Withdrarnz Proposal Tabled Proposal Development
(06!08/88) (01/13/88) (09/14/88) Guide Staodards
Total Acres 414.90 ac 414.90 ac 414.90 ac NIA
Intensity No./% 50,179 td/ac 29,663 td/ac 29.386 td/ac 75 td/ac - Low
(61% over w/Node) (5X under) 0% under) 250 td/ac - Moderate
09 u!e 5.20 u/a 4.10 u/aa Low - Cross Density
Density T. 5.10 u/a"R 4,7 Units//sere
(Units Per Acre)
Acres SP 254.30 ac 313.40 ac 313.40 ac N/A
Acres MF 27.10 ac 16.00 ac 16,00 aL N/A
Acres of Park Land 26 ac Park/ 18 ac/Part. 18 ac Park/ N/A
10 ac Jt. Park/School 10 ac Jt. Park/ 10 ac Jt. Park/ 1
School School
Concentration of Tract 19 - 212 Units Conformed With Conforms With Low - 20U Units }
J Multi-Pa" ly Tract 3 - 465 Units Policies Policies Moderate - 750 Units
i
{
i Separation of Conformed Within Project Conformed Within Conforms Within 1/2 }Ii le or 2,640'
Project Project
Multi-Family
Concentration of Tract 15 - 7 Acres 0 Conforms Except Conforms Except 4 Acres
Non-Residential Tract 11 - 3 Acres NS Tract 8 is 12 Tract 8 is 12
Lend Uses in Low Acres OR) Acres (CR)
intensity Areas
Separation of Tracts 11 and 15 Violate Conforms With Conforms With 1/2 Mile or 2,640'
Non-Residential Separation Policies Policies
Land Uses
Acres of Moderate Use 71 Acres 0 Acres U Acres 30 Acres for Each Node
Expanded to Maximum 250
Acres
i
se
ii
! • Cross density includes all the land within the boundaries of the particular tract. Net density excludes certain
areas such as streets, easements, etc.
i 2311.1
I
i
i
j
Pn2 w1nutes
July 27, 1181
Page 10
ATTACHMENT 16
Mr. Kamman stated that due to the moderate node problem,
he was unable to support 2.91.013.
Chair called for a vote on the original motion with
amendment to approve 2.89.013 and It carried (4.)),
Engelbrecht, Mr. Kamman, and F's. Brock voted no,
C. 2.1861. Consider making a recommendation on the petition
o M , Inc, requesting approval of a planned development
and conce t plan on property currently toned planned devel-
opment (PB•el and PD-89) and agricultural (A), The request
includes approximately 414.9 acres of pproperty located
approximately 1,200 feet north of 1.3SE and extending to
Pecan Creek and mort fully shown In the Gideon Walker
Survey, Abstract 1330, and the William burham Survey,
Abstract 330. If approved, the following land uses would
be permittedt
Single Family • ID
82.0 acres with a density of 3.2 units per acre
Single Family • 7
• 190,4 acres with a density of 4,3 units per acre
Single Family • 6
50.4 acres with a density of 4.7 units per acre
Cluster homes
10.6 acres with a density of 8 units per acre
MuitI -Family
16.0 acres with a density of 25 units per acte
Nelghborhood Service
• 6.0 acres
Community Facility
• 3.0 acres
Centro Retail
11.0 acres
School/Park
• 10.J acres
Park
11.0 acres
Right-of-way
• 36.3 acres
Fifteen notices were mailed to propFerty owners within 200
feeti one reply fare was received fn favor and one was
received In opposition.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that in regards to the
ntensDty, he propperty is a low Intensity area as defined
by the enton Development Guide.
She said that according to the calculations, the pproposal
was S percent under the Intensity standard excluding the
right .of•way.
Ms. Carson stated the project conforms with the Derolop•
mint Guide's standards in the area of density with 4,1 f
units to the acre in single family and 15 units per acre
with multi•familr, for a total density of 5.2 units to the
acre excluding tAe right-of-way. The total density would
be slightly less with the right-of-way included.
She said there were son- questions regarding the school
lice in the 100 Year floodplaln and that the city has
requested that the area be elevated.
Ms. Carson continued that a portion of the property
located at the intersection of Fockrus Road and Shady
Shore/ Is toned planned development. She stated that one
planned development is toned for SF-7 and estate•tYpe
residences and the second is for a manufactured housing
subdivision. She stated the remaining property is toned
agricultural.
- 58 -
v
1
July Ives
Page II
PETiTIONE0.: Alexander S, Bascom Jr., AMB Realty Inc.,
stated that he had liven his presentation along with the
Ltkevlew presentation but he wanted to stress some key
Items,
He said the Colorado Boulevard moderate node was deleted
and that a twelve acre grocery store/shopping site was
proposed at the intersection,
IN FAYORi Tom Peters stated that he was in favor of
au~tF rew for the same reasons as Lakeview. He believed
it would be beneficial to the city.
Danny Patten stated that he was for the development but
felt the proposed multi-family and the nei hborhood ser-
vices would drop the value of his home, wh~ch is across
the street. He asked the Commission to require the devel-
opers to have a buffer some along Swisher Road north of
Fockrus Road.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked Mr. Patten where his property was
located. Mr. Patten said broken Arrow Estates.
Ilene Powell, Rt, 7 Denton, stated that she was In favor
of the development and did not think it would hurt anyone.
kay Grimes stated that he felt Denton needed the tie from
I- SSE to U.S. Highway 710. He added that he had dedicated
two acres for the construction of the road.
Ravin McCormick, It. 7 Boa 101-A, stated he felt the
development was good except for the multi-family and the
neighborhood services in the area where he lives.
Jan Abella stated that she was In favor of Southview and
suggested using a brick fence as a buffer.
OPPOSED: Gina Nunes It. 7 Box 105-E Shady Shares, stated
that she was upset with the proposal of aulti-famiy and
neighborhood services next to her property, She read a
letter from her father stating his opposition also.
Rebecca Nunes, It. 7 Box 101-E Shady Shoresi passed out
the letters from her husband to the Commisson. She
stated that she hoped that the Integrity of the
neighborhood was kept.
Edith Scheldt, Chaparrall Estates, stated that the owns
property on Swisher load and felt that keeping the beauty
of the area was lmpottant. She told the homes are aspen-
sive and cost In the range of 1200,000.7001 000, She added
that the arts is in a flood :one and will become easily
destroyed.
Don McNelienny, 175 Chaparrall Estates, stated that he
knew the area needed to be developed but felt It should
blend in with the existing homes. ke stated that the
homes in Chapotrall Estates are 2,500.7,000 square toot
homes and the proposed would be much smaller. He asked
the Commission to rake a consideration of fairness.
Mr. Holt asked Mr. HcNelttnny to describe the land which
is proposed to be developed, Mr, McNelienny said there
were rolling hills, thick wooded oreas, A creek running
through the property, and lots of natural rock,
Mr. Holt asked what the land to the north was like.
Mr, McNelienny stated that it was more heavil wooded with
brush, various native plants such at redbud gut the road
going through the property had enough room for only one
car,
59 -
1
J
_ r - - - . -
I
N
PC. Minutes
July i7, 1988
Pale 12
Mitchell Turner stated that the developers had made some
significant changes but fait there were still too many
residents to the acre. He added that the proposed grocery
store was three times the site allowed for in a low inten-
sity area. The Kroger store on University is on 3.9 acres
I and the Skills AlpDha Beta on 1.35E is on 4.0 acres. he
asked the Commisslon to deny the Southview proposal at
this time.
Craig Coad, Chaparrall Estates resident, stated that his
family lives in a 3,500 square foot hoae and felt that the
surrounding beauty of the area should be preserved.
Cindy Cad said that she would suggest some tyye of buffer
between the estate homes and the proposed smaller homes.
She added that she would like to maintain her property's
value.
RECOMMENDATIONS Ms. Carson stated that staff recommended
approriT wCts~the following conditions;
1. All information waived by the Planning and Development
Departsent at the Concept Plan stale shall be submitted
with the Detailed Plan for each phase of development
Including: location of lots in a residential subdivi-
sion; location of major drainage facilities and
improvements; location of ma or electrical lines; and
location, size and type of all fences, beret, or
screening devices.
2. Tracts 1 and 13 designated as park and school sites
shall be dedicated .o the City of Denton with the
first approved final plat for the phase in which the
property Is located (excluding platting for public
improvements only).
3. The developer will be responsible for elevating Tract
13 to a level above the 100-year flood lain as
determined by the City of Denton, so that a buildable
site will be available prior to construction of any
facilities on the property.
1. Road construction and improvesents shall be completed
in accordance with the submitted ph m ing schedule. So
building permits shall be isived for the next phase of
development until the bridge structure linking the
phases has been completed.
i
S. Land uses permitted In the following cate odes shall
be In accordance with the applicable sections of
Appendix toning Ordinance of the Code of Ordln-
onces. The following specific restrictions are
Imposed:
General Retails Article 7, Subsections G and H.
Offices ro e m tonal and Administrative Offices.
AT~oT~~'h__SorAo~od__Servie s Article 7, Subsection H.
ouuFic t s land uses shall be approved with
tTs~ eta a pan for those tracts. Community
facility uses may includes
I
Art Gallery or Museum
Cemetery
Church or Rectory
College or University
Public School
Private School
Community Center
Day Nursery, Day Care or kindergarten
Hospital
- 60 -
I
PAZ Minutes
July 27, 1939
Page 13
institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature
Library
Nursin Home or Residence Nome For Aged
Part. flsyground or Public Cmmmunlty Center
Fire Station or Similar Public Safety Building
Public Building of Local, State or Federal
Government
other similar uses approved on detailed plan.
6. If any of the requested public improvements are to be
constructed by the sale of the bonds under the Lakeview _
Road Utility District, prior to the final closing of
the sale and purchase of real property, the following
notice shall Be siren to the purchaser:
"The real property, described below, which you are
about to purchase is located in the Lakeview Road
Utility District. The district has taxing authority
separate Eros any other toxins authority, and may,
sub ect to a prowl of voters in the district, issue
bon s. As of this date, the most recent rate of taxes
levied by the district on real property in the district
is S on each $100 of assessed valuation. The
toaa aT mour7 of bonds which has been approved by the
voters and which have been or may, at this date be
issued is $ The purpose of the district Is to
provide for tEe construction and, prior to conveyance,
to the City of Denton, maintenance of a major arterial
street or feeder roads." The legal descripption of the
property which you are acquiring is as follows:
ate gnaturo of Seller
"The undersigned purchaser hereby acknowlbdg0a receipt
of the foregoing notice prior to closing of the yur-
chase of the real property described in such notice."
vat* gna ure o Purchaser
This notice, following executlon, acknowled rent, and
closing of purchase and sale shell be racer~ed in the
deed records of Denton County.
Ms. Brock asked who owned Swisher Road. Ms. Carson stated
that the City of Denton annexed half of the road and she
believes the City of Shady Shores owns the other half but
that the County maintains that section of Swisher Road.
Oily e Stephens Mayor of Shady Shores stated that the
City of Shady Shores and the City of Benton signed an ETJ
A reement in 1971 and Shady Shores' control is cast of the
r~Sht-of-way for Swisher Road.
The Commisslon discussed possibly swltchin tracts Ill and
fit with I16 and /17. Mr. Disco■ stated t9at it would be
acceptable with the developers,
Mr. Holt asked Mr Bascom whyy RMb Realtychose to build a
Sectary store on ii Acres . Mr. Bascom stated that three
to four aer•s were for the grocery store, the rest of the
strip center would be support service,
REBUTTALi Mr. Bascom stated that the developers would
war w h everyone to address each individual's concerns,
Chair declared public hearing closed,
i
61 -
Pb' Minutes
July 17, 1988
Page 14
DECISION: Mr. Holt said that the people that spoke In
avor o the development were actually speaking in
opposition. He stated that he saw q problem with the
neighborhood services area as well as the small lot homes
neat to the estate lots.
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that he sharesthe same concern. he
felt that it would be unattractive putting the homes bask
to back. He added that the multi-family and neighborhood
service was also a problem.
Mr. Bascom asked :f they could postpone or table the
project for two weeks to revise the plans and bring them
back. Mr. Robbins stated that public notices would have
to be sent out and there would not be enough time to
notify the public. He added the the ordinance requires
submittal at least fourteen (14) days prior to the meeting.
Mr. Glasscock moved to table 2.1861 until the regular
meetln4 of September I4, 1984. Seconded by Ms. hiker and
unanimously carried {7-0
0. Consider making a recommendation on the preliminary
and final replat of Lot 4 to Lots 4A and 48, Block B,
Expressway Industrial Park.
STAFF REPORTS Ms. Evans stated that the property was
Mato north and west of Shady Oaks Drive and was on a
1,817 acre tract of land.
Ms. Evans stated that the property is toned light
industrial, and no development is anticipated. City
services and facilities were available and the plat
conformed to the minimum requirements of the Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
PE7ITIONE r Bud Hauptman, Metropiex Engineering, stated
t at a attar was furnished from the owner, which was
requested in regards to the drainage requirement.
IN FAVORS None Present,
OPPOSEVI None Present.
RECD ENDATIONs Ms. Evans stated that the Development
Review ommTu recommended approval.
EIUTTALt Nonc Offered,
Chair declared public hearing closed. j,
DECISIONS Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
the preliminary and final replat of Lot 4 to Lots 4A and
41, Block a of Expressway Industrial Park. Seconded by
Me. Holt unanimously carried (7.0).
i
Ill. Considerations
A. Make a recommendation on the preliminary plat of Lots 1,
2 and 3, Block A, Lewis Medical Addition.
STFF REPOR t Ms. Evans stated that this was a 2,0729
acAre mac ocated south of 1.3SE service read and west of
$am Bass Boulevard. She added that the property is coned
commerclal, and office development was anticipated In the
future. City services and facilities were available and
the plat conformed to the minimum requirements of the
Denton Subdivision and land Development Regulations.
Ms. Evanq stated that the Development Review toomittee
recommended approval,
62
-
P t I Minutes
September 16, 1988
Page 2
ATTACHMENT 17
will be var ri
working intensity map are approximae te wliyll th be at no r loop bu holes
hey
account curedtaC oloi i tngties bitha otthern the final map t0 ake Into
eno t
of undevelopable land,
Mr. Holt asked the purpose of having an Interim Intensity map,
Mr, Strange answered that if a toning change Is requested prior
thecworrkinpptomaofoh da final eterminenthes intensltym~rreasindfmacan use
ke calcu-
lations. TAe Tatsk Force will also give tap priority to making
final dellneations and a lculations for that area.
Bill Claiborne, 820 Smokerlse, stated that he is speaking in
favor of adopting the map on behalf of the members of the
Appendix A Task Force, The members feel that using the TSis
shifts, building database
, and demographic ainf 0 rmation a us efuIptoutheion
City, This Is something that has not been available to the
City in the past.
No one spoke in opposition.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Fngelbrecht stated that since a working map Is needed,
he moved to recommend adopting the "Working tntensityy Map"
as prepared by the Appendix A Task Force, Seconded by
Mr. Glasscock and unant as y carried (6-0).
IV. CONSENT AGENOAi It was moved by Mr. Holt, seconded by
r• alma+n-Tnd unanimously carried (6.0) to approve the
consent agenda as follows!
A. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the Offenbacker
Addition, Lots 2 and 3, Block 1.
B. Recommend approval of preliminary replat of Township 11,
Phase 2, Lot 4A, Block A,
V. Public Hearings
A. 2-1861. Consider remorlnaa from the table and making a
recommendation on the petition of RMB, Inc. requesting
ppapproval of a planned development and concept pDIan on {
PD tned
Thedrequesteincludes8approxi-
mately 411,9 acres of property located approximately 1,200
feet north of I.35E and extending to Pecan Creek and more
andltheyWilliaatDurhameSurvey,teAbstract,33Dltrfftapproved,
the following land uses would be permittedt
A
Single Family • 10
93.4 acres with a density of 3.2 units per acre
Single Family • 7
• 269.4 acres with a density of 4,3 units per acre
cluster Homes
10,6 acres with a density of 8 units per acre
Multi-Family
16.0 acres with a density of 2S units per acre
Neighborhood Service
6,0 acres
CommunltY Facility
3.0 acres
General Retail
12.0 acres
School4ark
10,0 acres
-63-
f
It
1
I
l~ r
NUNN
--cis---.r
I
I
I
P 6 Z Minutes
September 14, lyBB
Page 3
Park'
18.0 acres
Right-of-way
36.5 acres
Fifteen notices were mailed to property owners within
2G0 feet; no reply farms were rece.ved in favor or in
opposIttart
It was moved by Mr. Glasscock and seconded byy
Mr. Engelbrecht to remove Z-I861 from the table.
Motion carried unanimously (6-0).
STAFF REPORT; Ms. Carson stated that the Planning and
Zoning Commission tabled the request on July 27, 1986
after a public hearing in order for the developers to
address some of the neighbors' concerns. The propperty
is located in a low intensity area as designated Dy the
Development Cutre. The concept plan, based on the Devel-
opment Guide t:,tensity standards, is 6 percent under the
low intensity standards. A four acre neighborhood service
tract has been relocated at the southwest corner of the
Intersection of Pockrus and Lakeview Boulevard. Buffering
has been provided for residences, The multi-family tract
across from broken Dow Estates has been moved according to
the request of existing homeowners. An SF-10 area has
been proposed across from Chaparral Estates. There will
be an SF-7 tract at Colorado and Lakeview Instead of SF-o.
PETITIONER: Alexander Bascom, Jr., of RMB Aealty, stated
that postponement of the consideration of 2-1861 was
requested at a July meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission when it became obvious that neighborhood con-
cerns had not been addressed. There will be less people
per acre and the neighborhood service area along Swisher
and Pockrus will now front on Lakeview Boulevard. There
will also to a 30 foot buffer tone between the existing
residences and the neighborhood service irea. the multi-
family in that area has also been moved to front on
Lakeview Boulevard. There will only be SF-7 frontage on
Swisher, The development has been designed with greater
than required setbacks and generous buffer tones. SF-10
wlII be across from Chaparral Estates, Mr. Bascom stated
that they are committed to showing the citizen groups the
buffer tones in the detailed plan. This proposal demon-% Gulde0 t eePlanning and Zoning Commissiion,aandetheoneigh-
1 boyhood.
Mr, Holt asked if a straight grid cr curved roads are
proposed for the neighborhood subdivisions.
Mr. Bascom replied that he does not know at this time.
A tree survey will need to be done and the drainage situa-
tion evaluated before the exact street layout can be deter-
mined. He said that Lakeview Boulevard has been designed
to act as a major artery and handle traffic between neigh-
borhoods, He added that every attempt will be made to
make t'1,e neighborhoods attractive and marketable.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked who will own the buffer tones,
Mr. Bascom replied that it will be under common ownership
and a homeowners' association will be responsible for the
maintenance.
IN FAVOR: Dan Mcyellenny, 138 Chaparral Estates, stated
t a-t several of the neilhtars met with Mr. Bascom and his
consultants. He said that they sensed AMD Realty's iienuine
cerity isoappreciated, HeasolEthat
thatheir hadtunderstoodsthat
64 -
J
I ~
P 8 Z Minutes
September 14, 1988
Page d
the buffer tones would be 50 feet instead of 30, but 3U
feet is acceptable. One of the conditions of the neighbors
agreeing to support the proposal is that the buffer tones
will be landscaped with existing trees and native Texas
plants of sufficient density so that backyards will not be
visible from Swisher.
Mr. McNelienny continued stating that the east side of
Swisher Road is a rural area. The original Southvlew
pproposal called for Swisher to be pared and yyutterid.
the residents feel that repaving will be sufficient,
It Is their hope that Swisher will be a deadend road
s: that there will be no through traffic.
Carol Nunes, Route 7, Box 10e-E, Swisher Road stated that
he would like to withdraw his letter of op coition, He
said that he now supports the request and is grateful fir
the changes that have been made In the plans,
Kevin McCormack, Route 7, Box 108-A, stated that he is
under the impression from the meeting with the developers
and homeowners that landscaping and berms will be provider.
for the Swisher and Pockrus area, so well, He said that
the County is planning to start work on the north end of
Swisher and proceed south doin grading work in conJunc-
tian with the cities of Shady Chores and Denton.
Ilene Powell, Route 7, Denton, asked if Swisher Road will
be widened.
Ms. Carson said yes, dwisher is proposed as a collector
street to tie Into Pockrus in the future. Additional
pavement will be needed. Pockrus will be widened as well.
Francis Gregg, 1902 N, Highway 171, Pilrt Point, stated
that she is pleased with Lakeview and Southvlew.
OPPOSED: None present.
RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Carson stated that the City of Denton
s propos ng annexation of .35 acres on Swisher Road. She
stated at this time Swisher Road is not proposed to dead-
end because Interior road Is cuts will not be determined
until the detailed plan is submitted. The Southvlew pro-
posal as submitted does not violate separation policies
for non-residential uses but there Is r concentration
violation of non-residential land uses at Colorado and
Lakeview Boulevard; however, staff feels this is justified.
She stated that the multi-family near Pecan :reek is + few
hundred feet short of the 1/2 mile separation policy. the
parkland dedications exceed requirements. The proposal is
under the intaisity standard. Staff recommends approval
with the fnIlooing conditions:
I 1. All information waived by the Planning and Development
Departrent at the concept plan stage shall be submitted
with the detailed plan for each phase of development
Including location of lots in a residential subdivi-
sion, locatl0n of major drainage facilities and Im-
yyrovements, location of major electrical lines, and
lmcatton, site and type of all fences, berms, or
screening Jevites.
i
2. Tracts 8 and 0 designated as park and school sites
shall be dedicated to the City of Dentcn with the
first approved final plat for the phase in which the
roperty is located (excluding platting for public
improvements only).
-65 -
i
I
P 6 Z Minutes
September 14, 1988
Page S
3, The developer will be responsible for elevating Tract
13 to a level above the 100-year floodplatn as deter-
mined by the City of Denton, so that a buildable site
will be available prior to construction of any faciii.
ties on the property,
4. Road construction and improvements shall be completed
in accordance with the submitted phasing schedule. No
building permits shall be issued for the next phase of
development until the bridge structure linking the
phases has been completed.
S. Land uses permitted In the following careyories shall
be in accordance with the applicable sectlons if
Appendix B, Zoning Ordinance, of the Code of Urdl-
nances. The following specific restrictions are
imposed:
General Retail: Article 7 Subsections G and H.
Ultirs: ro esslonal and id mtnistrative Offices.
F: -1"0 rhood Service: Article 7, Subsection H.
Zmmun ty~c ~7- land uses steAll be approved with
the de a me y on tar those tracts. Community facu-
lty uses may include:
Art Gallery or Museum
Cemetery
Church or Rectory
College or University
Public School
Private School
Community Center
Day Nursery, Day Care or lindergarten
Hospital
Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature
Library
Nursin Home or Residence Hone For Aged
Park, playground or Public Community Center
file station or Similar Public Safety Building
Public Building of Local, State or Federal Government
Other similar uses approved on detailed plan.
6. The construction of the roads shall not be financed
by bonds sold in accordance with provisions of a Road
Dtility District,
i
7, Electric Utility service shall be provided by the City
of Denton,
Hs, Brock asked how widening Swisher will affect the
' buffer tones, f
Ms. Carson stated that the setbacks will be from the edge
of the pavement.
1
Mr. Clark stated that the b:lffer will be done after the
1 road is widened. The Issue is with the curb and Sutter.
If Swisher is to remain rural, then it will not need
the curb and gutter, If Swisher Road is to be a col-
lector, culvert pipes could be installed instead of
curb and gutter, but they are more difficult b maintain.
Mr. Clark stated that it Swisher becomes a collector
street, he recommends installation of curb and gutter.
If it is to be A cul-de-sar, then it should be Quitclaimed
to the City of Shady Shores for their maintenance. He
said that if there will not be Denton traffic on the roid
it should be quitclaimed.
Ms. Carson stated that the majority of the road belongs
to the City of Denton. The annexation is to meet the
agreed upon ETJ line with the City of Shady Shores and
end contusion about who Is responsible for maintenance.
66 -
I
I ~
P 6 Z Minutes
Sapteniber 14, 1988
Page 6
Mr. Holt asked If a need for Swisner is foreseen.
t
Mr. Clark stated that Lakeview Boulevard will be of
adequate site to handle traffic in the area. If Swisher
is developed It will encourage cut-through traffic to
avoid the traffic lights.
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that if the 90 degree intersection
with Pockrus is eliminated, Swisher will got serve Denton.
Mr. Clark stated that the traffic study did not include
the touting of traffic onto Swisher; however, the way t,c
plan is proposed st-ndard requirements for paving and curb
and gutter would have to be met.
Mr. Bascom stated that it was agreed with the homeowners
that there would be no ingress/egress along Tr-ct 10 onto
Swisher. The pplan Is to funnel traffic to Laktvlew
Boulevard. Thfs will provide net hbornood security, no
improvements will be required, in~ the neighborhood wil:
remain as it is. The County is proposing to repave
Swisher, but the Southviaw development will not impact
Swisher.
Mr. Clark stated that the Subdivision Regulations require
pavement of roads that abut property being developed,
Mr. Bascom stated that he was under the lmpre aion that
Swisher would not have to be upgraded because the devel-
opment will not impact it. This understanding came from
the traffic study.
Mr. Clark stated that traffic study does not include
collector or peripheral streets,
Mr. Bascom stated that the issue can be addressed at
a later stage.
Ms. Brock asked it the issue needed to be addressed along
with the PD since it is an automatic requirement of the
` Subdivision Regulations.
Mr. Morris stated that it should be addressed during the
I platting stage or could be waived with the detailed plan.
Ms. Carson stated that there is not enough information at
tnis time. It can be looked at in the detailed plan stage.
The detailed plan will need to go to City Council and con-
ditions may be imposed to the detailed plan,
Ms. Brock stated that she had recommended for the Lakeview
toning request that City of Denton electric service be
required, but she understood that Otte may be a problem
with the condition,
f Mr. Morris stated that he recommends that the condition
requiring electric service to be purchased from the City
of Denton be excluded from the formal recommendation to
l City Council. Electric service Is governed by State law
`r and the Council will have tc be Informed that the condi-
tion cannot be imposed should It be forwarded to them.
L Mr. Engelbrecht asked how the berms and landscaping will
I be maintained In the future and how the City will ensure
the maintenance.
Ms. Carson stated that the Landsca a Ordinance requires
the owner to provide and maintain landscaping. In this
situation, staff recommends that a homeowners' association
be created to care for the buffer zone and all people buy-
ing property in the area be made aware of the requitement,
67 -
i
I
I ~
P 6 : Minutes
September 11, 1988
Page 11
laa~
Mr. Morris stated that pep Boys is entitled by right to
completely withdraw their proposal. He said that the
Commission can reject thr postponement but Pep Boys can
still request a w th.rawal.
James Dewey, engineer for the project, said that they came
James the intention of presenting the case. At that rime,
they thought chit they had nelghi.rhood support but when
they arrived at the meeting they found that both staff and
the neignborhood were nt. In agreement with them. He said
that they have listened to the neighborhood r,omments and
appreciate their input, Pep Boys would like 30 days to
determine whether they can work it out with them.
Robert Brown, 1600 Angelina Bend, stated that pep Boys met
with the homeowners and neighbors. They found out that
they don't have their support although they came expecting
lt. He said that the homeowners and neighbors told rbem
that the basis of their objections would not be able to be
addressed. They are only requesting postponement to build
their ease. He said that on behalf of the homtowners and
neighbors they request the postponement bt denied,
Mr. Robbins stated that the policies of the Commission
andttfteasecondtwlthdw u~lbtswrequestedErthetCommi»ion
may choose to hold the hearing.
Mr. Morris stated that the result of postponement or
withdrawal is the same. The petitioner has the right
to withdraw the case from the agenda,
Mr. Goodwin stated that he is s lawyer also and has a
different le al opinion of the ppolicy. The policy refers
to withdrawal of a case, not withdrawal from the agenda,
He said that there is a difference between withdrawal and
postponement.
M
come out r. Holt stated that when cases are withdrawn they usually
said thatbtheehomeowners tshouldeconsider that rIf nthe case
is heard tonight it might be approved, They might be
better off living the petitioners a chance to Improve their
;roposal. he said that when he asked then if they wanted
the postponement In order to make changes they said yes.
Mr, Goodwin stated that they have been waiting for S 1/2
hours. If Pep Boys wished to withdraw they should have
informed them earlier.
Mr. Holt moved that the case be withdrawn. Second by
Ms. Brock and unanimously carried (6-0).
Mr, Brown asked if the request could be brought back before
the Commission. Ms. Brock stated that if tho case is again
scheduled for public hearing, the property owners will ~e
notified.
4J. Discussion of revisions to the sign ordinance.
Ms. Carson toted that at the Commission's last meeting they
requested more research on the sign ordinance. The Commission
was particularly interested In signs along 1-S5 and In the
Central Business Dlstrict. The certification process may cause
delays in getting certification from the State for on-premise
signs along 1.35. The current sign ordinance allows signs along
1•31 to be a maximum of 42 J/2 feet off-ppremise and !0 trot on-
alon;sl-3SThere the Is proposedlsignfordtqinanceebecauseeof thesovver-
fasses and higher speed limits. Ms. Carson showed the Commis
soon slides of signs along 1.35 and in the Central Business
-68-
I
i
1 ~
T - - - - w
ATTACHMENT 18
PARK ASSESSMENT
LAKEVIEW/SOUTHVIEW DEVEL'4'11F.iTS
The Lakeview and Southview developments will provide a total of 92.5 acres
which will include four neighborhood parks with a total of 44 acres, one am I
linear park with a total of 140 acres, and a community park with a total of
30.2 acres. in addition, there is a four acre access to Corps of Engineers
property which could be leased as community park land in the future. This
Corps property could eventually take the development burden off the 30.2 acre
community park. It could also provide direct access to lakefront property for
Denton residents.
Lakeview
This development will include a 30.2 acre community park which will also act
as a site for a future junior high school and/or elementary school site, it
will also include a linear park of 14.3 acres that could act as part of a
future greenbelt along Cooper Creek out to Lake Lewisville. Lakeview will
also include two neighborhood parks of five acres and 11 acres and the four
acre access point into Corps property mentioned above.
Total Park Area 340 acres
Total School/Park Area 30.2 acres
Total 64.5 acres
Recommended Donationi
Standard ■ 1 acre per 100 dwelling units
i
Proposed dwelling units ■ 4,368 43.68 acres
Park land donation exceeds recommendation by 20.82 acres.
i
f
I
1
F
-69-
E
i
Tract 32 - 1.0 acres access window
- access road
- parking
- community park
Will provide access to 50+ acres of property which will be
leased from the Corps of Engineers. The area will be developed
as a community park. The additional community park will reduce
the intensity of athletic field development at the junior high
school site.
The proposed park land donation meets our park donation standard and the
Denton Development Plan.
southview
This development will include an 18 acre neighborhood park which will be
predominately open and natural due to the floodplain and a 30 acre school/park
site.
Total Park Area 18.0 acres
Total School/Park Area 10.0 acres
Total 28.0 acres
Recommended Donations
Standard • 1 acre per 100 dwelling units
Proposed dwelling units ■ 1#711 17.11 acres
Park land donation exceeds recommendation by 10.89 acres.
I,
j)
f
i
'r
l
70 -
i
Approximate Approximate
Non-Ploodplain Ploodplain
r
Trac: TYPe Park Total Acreage Acreage Acreage
Park Sites
12 N 5 q 4
18 N 11 *3 8
` 22 L 1443 065 13.8
f 32 AC 4 4 0
School/park Site
20 C 30.2 13.5 16.7
6405 22.0 42.5
Total
*The developer will also be responsible at each neighborhood park location to
make sure approximately three acres of land is elevated out of the floodplain
in one area of the park for facility development.
Type N (neighborhood)
L (linear)
C (community)
AC (access to future community park)
Tract 12 - 5.0 acre neighborhood park will serve the residential tracts in
the northeast area,
Tract 18 - 11.0 acre neighborhood park will serve the residential tracts
in the northwest areas
i
Tract 22 - 14.3 acre linear park will serve as a natural area and as part
of a future greenbelt system along Cooper Creek.
I Tract 20 - 30.2 acre school/park site
r
- 1 elementary school
71,000 s.f, school building, 650 students, grades 9-6
playground equipment
i open play fields
I
- 1 junior high school
( 1000000 s.f, school building, 1,OCJ students, grades 7-8
f 3 tennis courts (unlighted) (city/school)
soccer/football practice field (city/school)
soccer fie? a (city/scbool)
i
- approximately 20 acre area between the schools will act as the
community pack site and will allow for athletic fields, picnic
pavilions, and play areas, etc.
71 -
I
i
Approximate Approximate
Non-Floodplain Floodplain
Tract Type Park Total Acreage Acreage Acreage
park Sites
g N 18 *0.5 1765
School/Park Site
13* N 10 * 7.5 0
Total 28 10.5 17.5
*The developer will be cesponstblk for elevating Tract 13 to a level above the
100-year Floodplain as determined by the City of Denton, so that a buildable
site will be available prior to construction of any facilities on the
property.
4 *The developer will also be responsible at each neighborhood park location to
make sure approximately three acres of land is elevated out of the floodplain
in one area of the park for facility development.
E
Type Pack N (neighborhood park)
li
Park Areas
Tract 8 - 18.0 acre neighborhood park in northeast portion of the tract
to serve the residential areas to the north.
The tract will also provide a natural area along the creek with
a walk/jog trail for access to the school site to the south.
V
Tract 13 - 10.0 acre school park/!ite
r
-1 elementary school
71,000 s.f, school building, 650 students, grades R-6
playground equipment
open play fields
Neighborhood park in the south area of the tract to serve the
residential areas to the east and south.
The proposed park land donation meets our park donation standard and the
1 Denton Development Plan.
r E
i
i
72 -
oth Lakeviev and Soathview developments will not only meet our park
Bstth L a, but they will assist in opening up access to both the proposed
Pecan Creek greenbelt and & auscrgiveseusepotential access etoabhundredsloOf
along Lake Lewisville that could be
Cooper Creek. This development
acres of corps of engineers property
leased by the City of Denton and developed, two
e developments also provide school/park sites that filbothncthe City
These
and one junior high school. It is the philosophy o
and the Denton Independent Sehool District that these facilities will be use
development by the Denton
jointly by both agencies. Therefore, any
ae these facilities will be able to be used by the
independent School District
public when not in use. can use the
As usual) in a situation where we have a donation of land, we
value of the land as a match for Local Park Pund monies from the State of
Texas. This program bwill allow .s to develop these park areas if and when the
grants are approved
1
i
3
i
1
73 -
I
A COMPARISON OF PARK CHARACTERISTICS
Neighborhood Parks Community Park
(5-15 acres) (30 acres)
-large group play areas
-neighborhood play areas
-family picnic areas -picnic pavilions for large
group picnics
-2 tennis courts (unlighted) -multiple tennis courts
Ilighted)
-open play areas -formal lighted football/
soccer fields
-backstop for softball/baseball -formal lighted softball/
baseball fields
-hard surface play area (unlighted) -numerous hard surface play
f areas llightedl
-no public reetroom facilities -restrooms and concessions
-no off-street parking area unless -off-street parking areas
on-street parking is limited
-no recreation facilities -recreation center and
swimming pool
-Sot or more neighborhood use -Sot or more community use
•no league play or large -leagues and large community
wide special events
special ovents
-numerous extensively
security lighting only lighted areas
` i
4
f
t
-74-
i
i
f
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1861
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Leroy Falcon
Rt. 7, Box 93
Denton, Tx 76201
1
i
I
i
,
i
i
i
1
II t
F
f,
t
r
i'
L}
1 ~
,
ti •
` nt a` y
Or 4
7G_OW- -
rig----
~ 3 a
'~s!l~S 1X 7m28~ r'
'r
1
Y
h✓ad -
Abs~ 13',d Corr~invec/ ~ ~f~ o{'/T~kr~ Ca~'eviav /Swfhvrew
A,1 38 13, N 38 13P ! A ~>tiAdy '!~hore6 L?A&vo P ' WWshl~
I 2v/ i!la~n s)4
To~f-
~f : A3A4h; %X 70/02
T 38 2./ o.4 ~hr~ .L~~!'~nnBrc!/o
2505 - ea 0 ! r~hL •Sira O5
ot"
7G~d5--
7esi,wrj
roe A oZ
~ItL f~O.~JI~~ .tc
T 8.8119
7y- 76 /J L
vol /ep
V 2 1'3 1 Zgf
!X-70vtvi i
--NA- - kl.~J/r1 /`I~LOYrH~ f
.
_ 7u ilori ne
~r _ . 2~yJ and lee. 4vmxops
K''_7--. VOX ?2. c_
t
l/5 iQ GaryJl c~'~gir 7 Gj of ihfra s
~o rb~c 173od 4b0 5 2~.~~ F31~d.
P, AA*4) ie,(ss z/o2 ~slln )r 7!; Zvor
i
J
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REPEALING THE SITE PLAN
AND CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO THE 17,1 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NG. 84-180
(PD-88)1 REPEALING .;i SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO THE
49.41 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 84-181 (PD-89); PROVIDING FOR A
CHANGE FROM AGRICULTUR;%L "A" TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 348 ACRES OF LAND
AS MORE PARTICULARLY D]iSCRIBED HEREINi PROVIDING THAT THE LAND
INCLUDED IN PD-88 AND PD-89 AVD THE LAND HEREIN REZONED BE INCLUDED
IN AND BE A PART OF ONE NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-132)1
PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A NEW CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE 414.9
ACRES OF LAND INCLUDED11ITHIN THE NEW DISTRICTi AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, by ordinance No. 84-180 and No. 84-181, the City
Council approved planned development districts and site plans for
the 17.1 and 49.41 acres of land respectively described therein
(PD-88 and PD-89)r and
WHEREAS$ RMB, Inc. applied for approval of a change from
agricultural "A" to planned development zoning district
classification and use designation for 348 acres of land, as more
particularly described herein; and
WHEREAF„ the land described in ordinances No. 84-180 and No.
84-181 ana the land requested to be rezoned are proposed to be
included in and be a part of a single planned development districts
and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting the approval of a new f
concept plan for the entire 414.9 acres to be included in the new
district; and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 1988, the Planning and Zoning
commission recommended approval of the request for the change in
zoning and the approval of a new concept plan for the expanded
district; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF nENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
Z-1861/PAGE 1
f
,iECTION I. That Sections II and III of ordinance 84-180 (PD-
88), respectively imposing conditions and providing for approval _
of a site plan for the planned development district therein
created, are repealed.
SECTION II. That Sections II and III of Ordinance 84-181
(PD-89), respectively imposing conditions and providing for the
approval of a site plan for the planned development district
therein created, are repealed.
SECTION III. That the zoning district classification and use
designation of the 348 acres of real property described in Exhibit
"A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is
hereby changed from agricultural "A" to planned development "PD"
zoning district clasoification and use designation under the
comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION IV That the land previously included in Ordinance
No. 84-180 (PD-88) and No. 84-181 (PD-89) and the land herein
rezoned, shall hereafter be included in and be a part of one new
planned development district containing 414.924 acres of land, to
described in Exhibit "C", attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference (Southview, PD-132).
SECTION V. That in accordance with article 11 of Appendix
B -zoning of the Code of ordinances, the concept plan described as
Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
is approved for the 414.924 acres of land included in the district.
SSEC21ON VI. That the district herein approved shall be
subject to the following conditionss
1. Information for Detailed P
not required to be shown on the concept plant otherwise
required by article 11 of Appendix B - zoning of the Code of
Ordinances, shall be submitted with any detailed plan for any
property within the district.
2. Lad uses, The permitted land uses for each detailed plan
submintted for any tract of land shall be as defined or shown
in this ordinance and the approved concept plan. The general
site plan requirements for tracts
designated
for retail, neighborhood servico, and community facility general
("nonresidential uses"), have been waived at the concept plan
stage. The uses provided for herein for nonresidential tracts
2-1861/PAGE 2
I
M
~1
shall be permitted in accordance with the detailed plans
approved for those tracts, in accordance with article 11 of
Appendix B - Zoning, as amended. The detailed plans oubnitted
for the nonresidential tracts shall be subject to the
following conditions and restrictions:
(a) General Retail. For any tract designated for general
retail (GR) use on the concept plan, the following uses
shall be permitted in accordance with the detailed plans
approved for those tracts:
Auto laundry.
Auto sales and repair (in building).
Gasoline service station.
New auto parts sales stores.
Antique shop.
Bakery or confectionery ship (retail).
Cafeteria.
Cleaning and pressing small shop and pickup.
Custom personal service shop.
Drapery, needlework or weaving shop.
Florist or garden shop.
Greenhouse or plant nursery (retail)
Handicraft shop.
Vousehold appliance service and repair.
Laundry or cleaning (self service)
Mimeograph, stationary, or letter shop.
Mortuary or funeral parlor.
Offices, professional or administrative.
Licensed private club.
Restaurat.t. G
Retail stores and shops.
Studio for photographers, musician, artist or
health.
i1 Secondhand store, used furniture or rimmage sale.
(b) Neigbborood Service. For any tract designated for
neighborhood service (NS) use on the concert plan, the
following uses shall be permitted in accordance with the
detailed plans approved for those tracts:
Bakery or confectionery shop retail.
Cleaning and pressing small shop and pickup.
Custom personal service shop.
j Drapery, needlework or weaving shop.
Florist or garden shop.
Z-1861/PAGE 7
r
I
Handicraft shop.
Laundry or cleaning (self service),
offices, professional and administrative.
Retail stores and shops (4,000 square feet or less).
Studio for. photographer, musician, artist, or
health.
(c) ^smmunity Fg,ic 1ity. For any tract designated for a
co=unity facility (CF) use on the concept plan, the
following uses shall be permitted in accordance with the
detailed plans approved for those tracts:
Art gallery or museum.
Cemetery.
Church, rectory, or institution of religious or
philanthropic nature.
Public or private school, college, or university.
Child care facility.
Hospital, nursing home, or residence home for aged.
Park, playground, or public coaumunity center
Public building for governmental use.
Other similar uses approved on detailed plan.
3. Park V. School Sites, Tracts a and 13, designated for
park or park and school sites on the concept plan, shall each
be respectively conveyed to the City, free and clear of all
liens or encumbrances, upon arproval of the first final plat
approved for any tract of land included within the particular
phase of development in which the designated park or park and
school site is located, as shown in the concept plan. So as
to provide for a building site on Tract 13, excess soil
material excavated during the construction of that portion of
Lakeview Boulevard located in the same phase of development
as Tract 13, shall be placed upon Tract 13 in the quantities
and locations approved by the City Engineer. A minimum of
throe contiguous acres outside the 100-year floodplain shall
be provided in Tract 6 prior to conveyance.
i
46 goad utility District. No road utility district shall be
created or utilized to fund any construction of any street
located within the planned development district herein
defined.
SECTION VII. That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton,
Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the
Codo of ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under ordinance
Z-1861/PAGE 4
1
No. 69-1, as amended, is further amended to show such change in the
zoning district classification and use designation for the property
described in Section III of this ordinance.
BECTION VIII That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upen its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
ATTESTt
JENNIFER WAI1P£RS, CITY SECRETARY
f
i
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
Bye
/1. ~11L~IL'
i
R
i
l
I j
2-1861/PACE 5
EXHIBIT "A"
{1 of 5)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEING A TRACT ^F LAND $1rcarEO IN THE GIOEON WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO 1330,OENTON COUNTY,
TE{AS 040 BEING A PORTION OF MAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AS OESCR19ED BY DEED TO NEAL
1, roNERSLLO +ND Sa.'1 L, 1`11,NERELLO ;NO RECORDED 14 DEED VOLUME 488, PAGE 579, COUNTY
RECORDS, OENT;4 00 Tr. TEO S 11,0 BEING TORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND 6"l+05
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING .'IlT A i,'2 I'oCH FOUND AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TINNERELLO rAACT,
SAID POINT BEING IN THE NORTnERo RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SHADY SHORES ROAO;
THENCE S 80• '4' 06" S ;LCNG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID T14NERELLO TRACT, ALONG THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF•WAY LINE OF SAID SHADY SHORES RCAO AND CENERALLY ALONG A FENCE LINE.
349.82 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED "CARTER 6 BURGESS" SET, THE PGlvr
OF BEGINNING OF rMS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-
T4NG24T C'}RTE TO THE LEFT;
THENCE ALONG SAID 404-tANGS41T CURVE TO THE LEFT, LEAVING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID j
1`14NERELL0 TRACT ALSO 145 NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID SHADY SHORES ROAD AND ~ I
THE FENCE LINE, 1% : 'iOATHEASTERLY DIRECTION THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02' 15' S1",
A RADIUS OF 937.00 F££T, AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.45 FEET AND A LONG CHORD OF N 15' 46' 26' E,
15.45 FEEL rC s 5,8 INCH IRON 0.00 '44TH CAP STAMPED "CARTER 6 BURGESS" SET;
THENCE N t4' 38' 30" 57).69 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED "CARTER 6
BURGESS" SET AT THE SOurrEALO LINE OF M. K. 6 T. RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID,POINT BEING
THE BSGINNING :F % ',ON-rANGS4t CURVE TO THE RIGHT;
THENCE ALONG SAID ',C4-r.NGEv CjRYE rO THE RIGHT AND ALONG SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-14AI
IN A SOUTHEASTERLY DIRECTION THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04' 57' 22", A RADIUS OF 1442.93
FEET, AN ARC LENGTH SF 124,92 FEET AND A LONG CMOAO OF S 59' 27' 05" E. 124.78 FEET T3
A S/8 INCH IRON ROO WITH CAP STAMPED "CARTER 6 BURGESS" SET;
THENCE S 14' 36' )0' W, LEAVING SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, 539.49 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH
1204 ADD WITH CAP STAMPED "CARTEA 6 BURGESS" SET, THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHTI
THENCE ALONG $.410 CURVE TO THE RIGKT IN A SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 01' 25' 05". A RADIUS OF 1017.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 25.17 FEET AND A LONG CHORD OF
S 15. 21' 02" W, 25,17 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ADD WITH CAP STAMPED "CARTER 6 BURGESS"
SST IN THE NORTHERLY AIONT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED SHADY SHORES ROAD, ALSO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF THS AFOAEMENTIONED TINIIEAELLO TRACT AND ALSO A FENCE LIN11
THENCE N 80' 14+ 06W, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID SHADY SHORES ROAD,
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TINNERELLO TRACT AND GENERALLY ALONG A FENCE LINE,
120,83 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 1.818 ACRES OF LAND, 19009 OA LESS. ?
2-1961
~I
fil
M
1
1
N '
,1.O,1-7F23
EXHIBIT "A" (2 of 5) hiller of rexas
~ F[ RI,R 'i0'f CS
r All that certnin tract or parcel of lnnd titunted in the G(dnnn +iniker
Survey, Abstract Number 1330 and the Durham Survey, Abstract Hrimber
330, Denton County, 'texas, and hetng nl.l of a called first and second
tracts dcscrlhed Irk n deed from Geokge M. napkins to G(!orrv il.
Hop'cln9, Jr., et it. ns recorded in Volume 414, page 65, need Records
nod ail of tract described irk a deed from r+. J. Roddy, recorded in
Volume 13'13, pace dill, ;teed Records and all of a tract described in a
deed to Rrynn David S viers and 13arhnrn Jenn in+rers, Volume 1069, page
193, Oved !lecnrds and all of n tract described in a deed to Steven A.
` Higgins, et ux, Volume 1510, pale 51, real Property Records and n1t nC
a tract described in a deed to Virginia Lee Jowler, Volume 996, edge
4 911, >1erd Rrcnrds, and rill of a trnct described in n decd to Ravid D.
Vnu;lr, Volrnnn 036, pnrte 927, lined Recants and port of n tract
described in n dead to Paymond Lee Grimes, Volume 1411, page 654, Rent
Property Records and part of a tract descrihed in a deed to L, Fulton,
Volume 262, page 424, Deed Records of said Denton County, 'rexns and
beino more fully described as followss
Dcginning at a steel pin near the south line of Pockrus Road where it
intersects with Swisher Road and being the southwest corner of said
4eorge 11opkins first trnctl
'thence North 00 donrees 06 minutes 04 seconds East with the center of
Swisher Road and with the west boundary of sntd tract a distance of
1520.87 Feet to a steel pint
'thence North 97 degrees 50 minutes 58 seconds Cast alon,q and near a
fence a distance of 1635.56 feet to a fence corner:
Thence North rl7 degrees 41 minutes 35 seconds Cost a distance of
320.11 fuel to a 20-inch Oak treal
'thence North RIl (ingress 08 minutes 51 seconds (rest a distnnce of
1166.92 feet to a steel pins
Thence North (A) degrees 33 minutes 17 seconds West a distance of
113%29 feet to an "x"-tio for n fence cornerl
Thek.ce North A9 denraea 29 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of
1261.49 feet to a steel pin:
' Z-1861
-2-
i f
1
J
I j
t
r
I ~
ti .
I
EXHIBIT "A" (3 of 5) J-O.d-7628 continued
Inge 2
Thence Ilnrth 00 derrees 40 minutes 16 seconds lest a distance of 83.55
feat to nn iron pin and the start of a curve to the right whose radius
is 144U.0 feet.;
Thence with snid curve a distance of 552,92 feat (Central angle 22
degrees 00 minutes OU seconds, chord distance 549.53 feet north 10
degrees 19 minutes 44 sccondn Part) to an iron pin and the and of Said
curvy;
TlrencP North 71 rlpgrees 19 minutes 44 seconds I'snst n distance of
598.69 fort to on iron pin, nor) being on n line of a trnct shown to
the City of Dallas and recorded in Volume 212, page 501 of snid Deed
Records;
Thence Routh 70 derirees 46 minutes 39 seconds fast with anid City of
na1Ins line a distance of 250,9 feet to a concrete Honument Number
P-237-i1 rind on the east line of said Gideon Ilalker Survey and the west
line of said W. Durham Surveys
Thence South 24 degrees 35 minutes 32 seconds Cast a distance of
1164.14 feet to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Honument Number P-236-W
for a corner;
Thence north 79 degrees 33 minutes 36 seconds Cast a distance of
244.92 feet to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 4onument Number P-235-W
for a corners
Thence South 53 degrees 01 minutes 38 seconds r.%t a distance of
477.87 feet to U.S. Corps of Engineers Monument Number P-234-W for e
corner=
'thence South 41 degrees 03 minutes 34 seconds East a distance of h
1
385.97 feet to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument Number P-233-AW ~
for a corner; E
Thence 302.15 feet hto 41 U.S. CorpsnofaEngineers seconds
Number distance
for a corners
Thence South 30 degrees 25 minutes 39 seconds (lest a distance of !
359.62 feet to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument !lumber P-232-'J
fur n corners
I
4 ,
f Z-1661
I -3-
RECEIVED JAI; I
r
i
EXHIBIT "A" (4 of 5 ) J.0.0-7628 continued
untie 3
nieuce South 51 rlegrees 09 minutes 25 seconds 'Jest a distnnce of
rM,U9 feet to O.S. Army Corps of Englneers Monument Number 11-231-V
for a corner;
Thence South 23 degrees 32 minutes 36 seconds Nest a distance of
247,•97 feet to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument Number P-230-14
_
for a corners
Thence South 89 degrees 46 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of
705.81 feet to a fence post for a corner, said point being in the west
line of said W. Ourhain Survey and the east side of said Gideon Walker
Surveys
Thence South 00 decrees 23 mtnutes 51 seconds East n distnnce of
7455.68 feet nionq the yaid west line of W. Durham Survey and the east
line of said Gideon Walker Survey to an iron pins
Thence South 011 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds rnst n distnnce of
171".55 feet nlong the said west line of the W. Durham Survey and the
enst line of sold Gideon Walker Survey to an iron pin, said point
being the southenst corner of said George N, Ilopkinn Surveys
'thence South 99 degrees 05 minutes 22 seconds West along and near a
fence and with the south boundary line of said Geoge H. Hopkins Survey
a distance of 3550,65 feet to Point of Beginning, containing 301,913
acres,
f
i
1
I
i
2-1861
t
RIrCEIVEU JAN 1 6 V3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT "A" (5 of 5)
All that tract of land situated in the Gideon Walker Survey,
Abstract Number 1330, Denton County, Texas, said tract being that
44.710 acre tract described in a deed to Oak-Scott Five, Ltd. as
recorded in Volume 1111, Page 448, Deed Records, Denton County,
Texas, said tract being more particularly described as followsi
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said 44.710 acre tract, being
a point in Page Road;
THENCE S 02' 08' 53" W, 2168.42 feet to a point in the northerly
right-of-way line of the M. K. 6 T. Railroad;
THENCE N 454 40' 33" W, 276.93 feet along said oe-therly
right-of-way line to the beginning of a curve to the
THENCE 767.02 feet along the are of said curve to the left and
along said right-of-way line, through a central angle of
28' 28' 59", whose radius is 1542.93 feet, the long chord of which
bears N 59' 55' 02.5" W, 759.13 feet;
THENCE N 14' 09' 32" W, 213.79 feet along said right-of-way line
to a point]
THENCE N 02' 26' 18" E. 1586.69 feet to a point in said Page Road;
THENCE S 87' 16' 20" E, 1077.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and
containing 44.710 acres of land.
i
i
i
r
-5- ~1
1
f
`I
1
a
EXHIBIT "B"
CONCEPT PLAN FOR SOUTHVIEW, CONSISTING OF:
1. Conceptual Site Plan (1 page);
2. Development Standards (4 pages);
3. Summary of Zoning Restrictions (6 pages);
4. Phasing Schedules (23 pages); and
5. Utility Exhibit 0 page).
j
i
i
4
i
i
i
1
i
4
2.1661
f
t
T
LAM uvos Nall
i
y
A n . ~ 11" `r Z~
1
n
..M t•'1 M1 ♦h NYM •.n
f t
• V r.
` O
L I M
61 V 16. 1 ' ..r
:I
,...y 1~ Is
~I IT 1 I{ .
%OWN
f
all
1. .
1 Ily
1f .
I,.y y.~n r 11,,
l . r ouNO..I /U.N rol.
90UTHVIEW
M
K4NN.tl WHLMWM WNTO/4 t•.Y
A QQQ,"'
rH w.YN w. YaNIH Y.IMM H41rIF1
NI. M41~114 IYIYI . M.~1 M6
+11+.1 M1.r1 1 .r 6-01 • ~H M♦ 1.M IH•U IN MOAN
I• MIMVII HIWI "If 1111 ON M1 w'I
..)f'f YI11~A~MIN. .In 1 it l 1~ ii I li M..un Y Ig1 N♦~
1rWIM, HAY HE. yr 6111•NH♦♦s HI"
I IVlllp gllnlfl I+i.yi~l 1. M~My 11M ~._I IIIM •In ♦M yM lam H.H
DEVELCOXENT STANDARDS
CONCEPT PLAN
8-26-88
1. Scacemanc of Intent of Owneri
S,:jLhyiew Planned Development (PD) is a proposed mixed use development with cegw,jer ial
residential and open space land uses The development concept is in response cc: the
physical relationship of the site to Lake Lewisville compatibility and diversity_f
land uses: providing commL:nity housing, employment and commercial activity balance of
transportation system v/land uses public safety v/improved access 6 circulation pro-
viding improved watgr 6 sanitary sewer systemai and maintaining open space greenbelts
as well as providing park 6' school facilities for the region.
2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guide;
Southview Planned Development (PD) proposes a r eduction in density from the
previously approved Southview PD. The intention is a quality development for
Denton in ae~o•aanra u4th the Denton Development Cuide.
Total NuMer of Acres in Proposed Districts
414.9 acres
e. Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tracts
Total Proposed Acreage
a. Single family Detached 302.6
_
b. Single family Attached Itownhouses, cluster$ etc.) 1016
c. Attached Patio/Garden/teco Lot Line -
d. Duplex j
e. Multi-family 15.0
f. Office - -
9. Neighoochood Service 6.0
h. General Retail 12.0
i. commercial
1. Light Industclal
f
k. Meavy Indistciai f
14 Other (specify) Park 1810
School/Park 1060
Community Facilities 3.0
Major ROIL
- 24.6
collector ROW 11.9
Total 414.9 Ac.
i
1
Page 1
S. Cff-Site Information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, toning, streets,
drainage facilitiese and other exlscing or proposed improvements.
(Shown on z4AGtlt or detailed plan.)
6, Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept oa~xoV~aQusplan.)
Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.)
Rafar to traffic study report
76 Buildingsi
a. Approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
b. Maximum heightt
Shoves in Summary on Concept Plan
C. Minimum setbackat (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Shown on Summary of Zoning Restrictions
d. maximum gross floor area (square feet) tot nonresidential:
Shown in Summary on Concept Plan
is Residential Subdivision:
a. number of units pet acre (density)i
Shown in Summary oo Coi,eept Plan
b. Rumor and location of loss: (Shown on concept of detailed plan.)
To be shovn_in detail plan
e. Mlninua site, width and depth of Iota: (Shorn on concept of detailed plan.)
Shown In. P.D. Zoning Festriction Summary
r
i
d, naIM& a fronto aids sad teat yard setbackat (Shove on concept of detailed plan.1
Show in P.D, Zoning Restrictio•i Summary
peveloFcenc Standards
Page 3
9. watec and Drainage - +PProximato location of all existing of proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplafns, other water lity ntion Or major drainage facilities
and improvements. (Shown on t4 plan.1
10. Utilities - location of all major sewer, Water or electfiul lines and facilities.
` (Snows on concept attmdewrrt*d plan.)
`r 11. Location of trees l' in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
fl IShovn on concept or voce" plan.) Tree masses are shown on the concept plan.
Detail crag locactoo is requested to be waived until detail plan review and
approval process.
12. open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parka, common and recreational areas.
(Shown on concept omoWoeomvd plan.)
The locations of ma or arks and greenbelts are indicated on the concept plan.
Further detail will be shown at tha time of preliminary platting and detail plan
review and approval.
13. Screening - location, type and gist of all !anus, betas or screaninl features.
(Shown on concept ocodacatind plan,)
Nor applicable at this time It to request ad chat detail screen destgn bd~
waived until detail plan review and soproval,_
164 Developnant schedule (concept plan) - shoving specific date detailed plan will
be submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of
developeent. All dates should indicate month and year.
Sea attachment for Development Schedule
i
I
,i
ADD111OKU 91CQUI t C NIS POX A 09TA1LLd PLAN
I
15a Landscaping Plan - majet features gad types of lands "Ping to b• used. j
Not Soolfcable at this time it is requestad that detail landoca a architectural
daeiat be made a requiramaot of the detail plan roviat and aPPtoyal process.
f
r ~
1
I
{
I
Development Standards
page a
16. Signs - show location, type and site on detailed plant otherwise, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the toning•Ordinance.
!ioc applicable at this time. Any on-premise signs not in conformance with
Article 1) will be described an detailed site plan as to location, size and type.
j 17. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.) Not applicable ac chic time. It is requested
fl that sidewalk locations be waived until detail sick plan review.
16. All information cequired for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A
(Denton Development code) of the Code of Ordinances.
(A separate plat is requited.)
19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
i Construction and the rata of development. All dates should indicato siontb
F and year.
Sao attached schedule. Addicioaal schedule information will be submitted in
conlunction with detail plan and preliminary plat approval.
an
~/IT
t
1
8/28/88 ( Revised 10-13-88
SUMMARY OF ZONING RESTRICTIONS • SOUTHVIEW
O6T70pT EFT ►ON 1A74) AREA TYPCAL LOl MNL l0 W1K BIAlW16 NAK WlK M, IAAK L411 ►1P2 ST]E jWt REAR A1f1 PARKN G LY1 OPEN LRY13 LMX
PERSON TOIAL
OEyOW1TgN AC7E4 PEA IP47 LOT SRE CEPM WD7N1 COVEAAOE &DIi ISTORES) FAA 71gHf YARD YARD I/D.4 a SPACE PER S PER POP.
50. IT. YARD P/Sf. 01 ►A IACRE57 ACRE 0.4
S'N4.E FAMLY-lo S!A 10,000 Sy, 40 s 175 170 70 35tt NA ! NA >Q 107< 10 ENCLO W 72 441 31 034
WOOLA F"ALY-7 406A YAW Sy. 60 a 115 100 b us kA ! NA T96 10% 10 t ENOLO NA I.S 900 30 2,700
NIARCEL I W
6"1 61WI.10 n4 g000 if. SO Y VS 140 70 3611 NA t /IA !0 10% JO ? ENCLOBEO NA J! 79 ! J ME
CLUSTEA NOWA 10.6 MA NA NA NA 36f MA ! HA 10 EPAAAT 10 ENCLOSED 4.0 S L4 2.7 440
YAAI"AM%Y M,0 NA MA NA NA IOS NA J NA JO /~1NMA~ 10 1.76 LS as .400 !.S %000
i
COMMUNITY 3.4 NA MA NA NA 40% 164,610 4 0.4 90 m 10 11tH S.F. NA NA NA NA NA
t FACILITY
MEISYioalow
9.6 NA NA /1A NA 40% l~1,046 ! 0i6 JO 10 10 1/400 S.F. NA NA NA NA NA
i
OENSAAL MAL 14.4 NA ILA NA MA IOM WAYS ! 10 JO NA to 1/200 Sf. IA NA NA NA NA
I
SCNOOLIPARM 10.9 MA MA MA MA MA ENA MA MA MA MA IA MA /4.S MA MA MA MA
PARK 14,6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 'NA NA NA NA 14.3 NA NA NA NA
1
i
MAJOR AO.W. 14A NA . NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NO
COLLECTOR AO.W. IL0 NA NW NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA IIA NA NA
f01ALi 4145 114,6; - - - - 26.4 1,64! 4,140
i
• M•MIN MYMa F l 0aan D~+MN~Mt OdN 1A11A• 1n1~MI rW w /I YYIY FM M ~ YYN rrMq
i
I
I
I`
1
115'
p I~ m
o
0
31
O I S' z
OC 3
W ,
y ~+,,af ~ , ~ aC
y St
30' 1 b a,
kx~ a sw-~: W
Buffos
Zon• r,
g ~
4
a
10' B.L. TM ~ ~.~~.13.r.~.~..
1
PARCEL 18 SF-10 BUFFER ZONE
RMB REALTY I H 7CAJ ER 8URGESSINt
[W."In• ,wwu•w~JMRi
SCALE: N.T.S. r wto. stow" ,d= .nea nw r.+
Nn Lli11 ono. im
143
6'
1 125'
.O J J~ J m
I 111
m '
m •
b O I m O aD
aye $
I co A a
`t I
.
o f ;
10' B. t. 10' B.L.
.123•
PARCEL 18 SF-10 LOT LAYOUT
RMB REALTY 7.
,MCI eIS AA.kRGwiOiVMi
SCALE: N.T.S.
Ir OXON umf I wn * fK nw %w
Wl u•i11 '4183N••17
I~
{rI
I
l I
F. dap,
npR
PAT,
`R ' T31B.L
3 w, 4~R `
ryR, lap. O L-Iv
MErT-
® • ~•t,
W
K, IIY v 7 K. bl n{p C
M1rAR
nbp 4AR. ` 737" O .
It Dp
H 5
~ o
t4 , r
K Dp
moot eka
K
4y •s ® K 4M
SF- 10 TYPICAL LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER of TEXAS
SCALE: N.T.B. CARM i BURGESS'BVC.
ENGINlW a PLANNERS
i.rr.a. nw+./. w Mr/./f was rt W f111.
1
I
• Mai . ~ . . _
~a NT . WV
.rt' ti 2WILL
3 uy. u~
HIP. ~.AR • K
tr
I~ p
N W
Q
5F
rte G•n If- K DR
K
• ® K kr
Ib Lint Wy
261.2
$F=7 TYPICAL LOT LINE LAYOUT
MILLER at TEXAS 1'_0
GARTER & SURGESS,INC.
SCALE: N.T.S. ENGINEERS r PUWNERS
twwewurn~r• rr»wn.wn nau»~n
It
1
i
o•
- o.
6' A I O' R
o ~
m o a`
o T n
~a
04 '
40'
cy
z
t
t m N ORS
~ r
4' WALK QUEST PARKING
300 40' Iola
PATIO HOME CLUSTER LAYOUT
MIL7ER of TkXAS
CARTER R 1URGESSJWN
SCALE N.T.B. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS
I
SOUTHVIEW ADDITION
SUBMITTAL/REVIEW SCHEDULE
i
8-26.88
Submittal to the City of Denton for
Consideration by Planning d Zoning
Commission and City Council
Transportation Improvements March 1989
Plan
P.D. District Detail Concept March 190
Plan
Utility/Drainage Improvements March 1989
Plan
phase IA - Detail Plan/ March 1989
Preliminary Plat
Phase I8 - Detail Plan/ January 1991
Preliminary plat
'chase 11 - Detail Plan/ January 1993
preliminary Plat
i
i
i'
i
y
I
1
IIV o-
CdB No. 1187008001
i
SOUTHVIEW ADDITION
DEVELOPMENT PHASING SCHEDULE
(8-26-88)
X of Site Plan Development
Phase Acreage Tracts Project Submittal/Review Start
i IA 164.7 11 thru 14 a 43 March 1989 July 1989
lb thru 18
IB 89.1 6 thru 10 a 23 March 1992 July 1992
15
II 124.9 1 thru 5 34 March 1994 July 1994
378.7 Acres
a
.x
I ' I
I
i
I
f
ca No. P187008DOL
i
ROAD PHASING SCHEDULE
o PHASE IA 17
TRACTS - 11, 12, 171 14, 16,
(see Figures 5 and 6)
Build Lakeview Blvd. as a two-lane roadway
from I.H. 35E to Meadowlark
provide signalization at:
Lakeview and I.K. 35E Southbound Service Rd
I.K. 3E Northbound Service Rd
Lakeview
and Shady Shores
a
and
M connection between of Tract 14M willlnot be made
Meadowlark Read,
until Meadowlark is improved to a driveable standard.
I
I
4
i
f
I
i
VII i
I
1
I
I
►lCAN CR16K
COLORADO SLVO.
It 3 14
r 12
16 @
3
17
14% \ S a
FIGURE 5 LEGEND
Developmental Phasing P6ue IA
Phase IA
Southvlew Development Other Phwa
i
1
J
„wr uc ees
elAao
3
>I
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
McKI„Ner MLLS
U00" \
•
ooLOAAOo
LEGEND:
8 .
,,f O , Nl
Road Improvement'
J~
Si~aa1
1 erMp sq~ts
FIGURE 6
Developmental Phasing O
Pha,e0 I A
Improvements
i
• PHASE IB
TRACTS - 6, 70 8, 90 lo, 15
(see Figures 7 and 8)
Build Lakeview Boulevard as a four-lane,
divided roadway from I.H. 35E to the
northern boundary of Tracts 5 and 7
NOT£s Colorado will be built as a minimum of two lanes from
Lakeview Boulevard to Tract 7.
i
I
f~
i
ti
I
I
1
i
l1
f
PECAN CREEK
COLORADO *6VD.
b
10 9 8
15
.
W
FlouRE I LEGEND:
Dfvelopmentnl phnnlnil ❑ Phm Is
PhM$4 IS Other Phua
• Southviow DOvNopm*rt
MWY 310
M am I
r
t GL AGO ~
h i
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
wcelNhSY MILLS
MORN
Of
I
I
LEGEND:
Road Imptovomfol ~ •
nor
j
I
FIGURE 8
Developmental Phasing
Phase 1 8
Improvements
I
• PHASE II
TRACTS - 10 20 30 4, 5
(see Figures 9 and 10)
Extend Lakeview Boulevard as a four-lane,
divided roadway from Tract 5 and 7 to
Pecan Creek
Build Meadowlark as a four-lane, divided
roadway from Lakeview Boulevard to I.H. 35E
Construct right-turn lanes at*
Lakeview and Meadowlark, westbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Y.H. 35E Northbound Service
Road, southwestbound to northwestbound
Construct left-turn lanes ats
&ajc@vipw and I.H. 35E Southbound Service
Road, sout7,eastbound to northeastbound
Widen I.H. 35E ov#rpass at Lakeview Boulevard
to 5 lanes
I
E
i
i
i
i r
I
i
i
PECAN CA91K
2
3
4
COLORADO YLYD. ~
5
~t
•~I
FIGURE 9 LEGBND..
Developmental Phasing Pew tt
Phase II
Southvlew Development odw Ph""
r
J
HIM ~fo
imemoomme lLAOQ
t
r2
~ v
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
McMINNar MILL f
l
MORla A
~ rot
• tit
\t
OOLOAAOQ 33 I~
LEGEND: M •u1+,. , f
Road Improvemew 114P /
«1 Tura Laae
uaor &CONS
.
FIGURE 10
Developmental Phasing
[taw Phase 11
:Improvements ~
I
e Build the bridge over Pecan creek
e PHASE IIIA
TRACTS - 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 381 391 401 41
(see Figures 11 and .2)
- Extend and widen Lakeview to six-lanes from
I.H. 35E to the northern and of Tract 33
-
Provide signalization at:
Lakeview and Colorado
- Construct right-turn lanes at:
Lakeview and McKinney, eastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and I.H. 35E Northbo'=rd Service
Road, northwestbound to northeasrbound
- Construct left-turn lanes ats
Lakeview and McKinney, northbound to
westbound
- widen F.H. 35E overpass at Lakeview Boulevard
to 7 lanes
NOTES McKinney Street (F.M. 426) is assumed to be built to
the designated thoroughfare standard of lour lanes, divided.
NOTE: Siqnalization and widening to a live lane section of
Meadowlark Road at I.H. 35E is assumed.
i
i
e
1
l
i
BLAao
1b/ Q
23
MILL!
19
22/
coo.ell
28/ CUItK
30
32
31
3/ 36
33
~aKIVNR 3 / 38
37/ a 40
39 ' 41
r~CAM CII~~K-•~ AKlVIlW
BLVD. 4E(38Nb
FIGURE 11 ❑ Phue 111A
Dovolapmonlal Phaalnq
NOthet Phaa
Phaa 111A
LakoVlow oovolopmont
r
Nwr. s~o
J
a
LAKE
LEWISVILLE
1rLLS
Me KINNlr
MOAN w~ yr
y S
1
1+
`COLp1A00
Rand lmptovamsoe r~ t•~
Slsa: l
~+a' f+oRr•
FIGURE 12
Developmental PhOSInq
Ph@" III A
Improvements
1
i
• PHASE IIIB
TRACTS - 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
(sae Figures 13 and 14)
Extend Lakeview Boulevard from Tract 33 to
Tract 22 as a six-lane, divided roadway
Construct right-turn lanes atr
Loop 288 Bypass] and I.H. 35E Northbound
Service Rd, southbound to northwest-
bound
Loop 288 Bypass and I.H. 35E Southbound
Service Rd, northbound to southeast-
bound
4
' I
rr
j
i
r
i
1
Nw+ ,SRO
SLAGO
15
23
18
Intl.
19
2Ai
L J Comm
28"_.27
30 29
32
31
~QkllyN33/ 36
® 38
37/ 40
39 41
PI CAM CKRRK...O~
LAKRVIRW LEGEND:
BLVD.
FIGURE i3 ❑ ehR■ tt[B
Davalopmantal Phasing
Phi" 1118 Odw eh&M
Lokavl*W DawloPmsnt
I ~
r
LAXf
~eKHNIr LE WISVILLE
yWN
COWAApq
LEGEND:
Rood
4
Tuts Laos
Wor *ORE$
FIGURE 14
DowlopmoMal Phsslnq
Photo Ill S
Improvwmonle
J
• Build the bridge over Cooper Creak
• PHASE IVA
TRACTS - 11 2, 3, 41 51 61 70 S, 9, 11, 18,
19, 20, 21, 220 23
(see Figures 15 and 16)
Extend Lakeview as a six-lane, divided
roadway from Tract 22 to U.S. 360
Provide signalization att
Mayhill and Blaqg
Mayhill and Mills
Lakeview end Blagg
Lakeview and Mills
Lakeview and F.M. 426
Construct right-turn lanes ats
Lakeview and U.S. 380, sastbound to
southbound
Lakeview and McKinney, southbound to
westbound
Lakeview and Colorado, eastbound to
southbound
Lakaview and Meadowlark, westbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Shady Shores, southbound to
westbound
Construct left-turn lanes ate
Lakeview and U.S. 380, westbound to
southbound
Lakeview and McKinney, eastbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Colorado, eastbound to
northbound
Lakeview and Meadowlark, southbound to
eastbound
NOTEi McKinney Street and Mayhill Road are assumed to be
built to their designated thoroughfare standards.
NoTBe Mills Road and Slagg Road are assurAd to be driveable.
Future study may be required if they are not in an acceptable
state for motor vehicle use.
4 5 b
8 9
• 3.~ 11
LL A 00
15 23
18 20 2
MILLI
19
22/ COOF9R
28, CRiIK
30
~
31 32
336
38
37/
40
39 41
PSCAH Cull( A MAW UGEN[R
(1 SLVO. ph$* IVA
'JOURE 16 ®00w Ph*"$
Developmental Phasing
Phase IVA
• Lsksvlew Dsvsloprnent
1 ~
i
j t
µWY310 i
1LAOO
1 O LAKE
f / r LEWISVILLE
'AeRiNINY MLLE L
NOM K ~
4 a~
j ~
.ai
ooLO~AOO
yt
LEGEND:
i
Ro/d Iroprowmsat j
Turn Loot
Slond Aar 640A// !
Bridle
FIQURE 16
Dwalopmanlal Phasing
Phase IV A
• Improvements
i
• PHASE IVH
TRACTS - 12, 131 16, 151 160 171 241 25, 26 and
all remaining tracts
(see Figures 17 and 18)
- Construct right-turn lanes ats
*Mayhill and McKinney, northbound to
eastbound, southbound to westbouni
Loop 288 and 1.H. 35E Northbound
Service Rd, northw•stbound to
northeastbound
construct left-turn lane ats
*Mayhill and McKinney, westbound to
southbound
NOTEt if the bridge across T.H. 350 is not widened, then
additional studies should be submitted prior to advancing it,
the sequencing scheme.
NOTES It Loop 288 Bypass is not built, there would not be any
major impact on the transportation system caused by the
Southview and Lakeview developments.
* Prior to the development of each tract of land, a detailed
plan, meeting the requirements of Article 11 of Appendix A-
Zonin of the Code of ordinances, shall be submitted for City
Council approval, after recommendation is made thereon by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. Concurrent with the
submission of the first such detailed plan, a Transportation
Improvement Plan addressing thoc.i specific traffic
improvements necessary to serve this entire phase of
development, without altering the improvements associated
with Lakeview Boulevard, shall also be submitted and
approved.
e
I
`s
I~
i
I
I
N
H'KY' SAO 0000000
~
1LA00
M 13 2 Ilk-
1 15 l6 14 23
4,
17
1 L5 t
WILL/ nL
19 V
22/
cooPall
28/ CMIIK
30
32
31
y.k,k~33 36
38
37/ 40
P/CAN C1111K 3n
LAKIVIIM 41 LEGEND!
ILVD. PhM [VB
FIGURE 17 odw PhASIS
Developmentai Phasing
Phase IVf
Lakeview Deveiope;ent
- -
Nwr. s+o
ILAGO
LAK!
LIWISYILL!
4e KINNa t' M LL !
t
MM
A~
400
~~Aep
I
LEGEND:
Tura Laos
* To be Determined Later j
I
► b"s
FIOUR9 is
Developmental phasing
Phase IV S
Improvements
I
I
f
!
,1.
I
11 ~ • i f~wu' / 1 j ~ , f '
l~ • '1 ~a )11L1 ~
1. ~
~ nAfSi 1
7- c es.y i u
T ~AL~•+~. l/r J
la »
1 1
~ IL1
~ 71f~
IMmr
••Arw Ny •u1 ' ~ -
rNWW I•r•y.f.YwW
~ ~ ~M1•W ryyMM..1I WYA•1
•IMI W.•./
r YILlta l4NOW Poll
DOUTNNIEW
• u KlINC CfVOLONMNa al"tt I "X"
~YW~~~W~ .rwr .M Ow•Ifl O1rP.OMY R.i1Mf f•MYl
poll • 'r • • frl N.J6 `R RYIM • 4/IffPl. K
"I pIW •MM IN YYpY Ir1
ail ~ • ry, n.yyH YrPIW PI Y. PH
MN
IY1111.1;NIy 1' •~.w •yl r0•f11. M1Y +•WP A..vn41l.Y NN
' IV.Mlw 11 ++ql P ~ P.I e'IIM ~1 Vi IN M•l N.fl PN NM
I 1
sn
EXHIBIT "C"
(1 of 9)
87-0020.112
Cartef & Burgess
08 June 1987
SoulliNew Planned Developrnent
FIELD NOTES
Wallker tSurvtey,t Abstract Numbed1330dandufile W lliam Durl amaSturovey,heAbs1lroct
Numbcr 330, Denton County, Texas and being more fully dcsc•ibcd as follows:
Beginning at a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P•237.%Y said -sonument
being on the east line of said Gideon Walker Survey and the west line of said
William Durham Survey, and the northeosl corner of a tract of land shown by deed
to RMB Land Company, Lid, and recorded in Volume 1851, Page 928, Real Property
Records and the north corner of a tract of land shown by dek f to RMB Land
Company, Ltd, and recorded in Volume 1820, Page 261 of the Real Propcity
Records, Denton County, Texas;
Thence South 21 degrees 53 minutei 14 seconds Cast, olgng the northernmost east
iine of said Rh10 tract (Volume 1820, Page 261), and a western line of said Garza.
Little Elm Reservoir, a distance of 1164.14 feel to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument P•236.1V;
Thence North 82 degrees 15 minutes 54 seconds East, along the southern north line
or said RMB tract {Volume 1820, Page 261), and a western line of said Garza•Litile
Elm Reservoir, a distance of 244.92 feet 10 a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument P•7354;
Thence South 50 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East, along the ta,t line of sold RMB
Ilact (Volume 1820, Page 261), and 1 west line of sold 04rta•Lhile Elm Reservoir, a
distance of 477,87 feel to o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-234-W;
Thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 16 seconds East, along the cast line of said RMB
tract (Volume 1820, Page 261), and a well line 00' said Carta-Little Elm Reservoir, a
distance of 31,5,97 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P•233•A1V;
Thence South 38 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 302.15 feet to a
U,S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-233•W;
f
f
I
i
1
I
N
I
EXHIBIT "C"
(2 of 9)
I
J.0.087•0020,B2 conlim:cd
page 2
Thence South 33 degrees 07 minutes 51 seconds West, along the cast line of said
RMB tract (Volume 1820, Page 261), and a west line of said Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 359.62 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Monument P-232-W;
Thence South 53 degrees 51 minutes 43 seconds West, along the east tine of said
RMB tract (Volume 1820, Page 261), and a wes line of said Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir, a distance of 681.09 feet to a U. \rmy Corps of Engineer
Monument P-231-W;
Thence South 26 degrees 14 minutes 54 seconds W.st, along the east line of said
RMB tract (Volume 1820, Page 261) and a west line of said Garza-Little Elm
Resetvc;r, a distance of 247,87 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument
Number P•230•1vsaid monument also being the southeast corner of said Rh16 irnct,
and a point it the north line of Bidden Valley Airpark Association, Ir.c, and
recorded In Volume 551, Page 415 of the Denton County Deed Records;
Thence North 87 degrees 30 minutes 55 seconds West, along the south line of said
RMB tract, (Volume 1820, Page 261) and -he north line of said Hrddan Valley tract,
a distance of 715.38 feet to an Iron pin, said pin being In the west line of said
W. Durham Survey and the east line of said Gideon Walker Survey; said pin also
being the southwest corner of said RMB tract (Volume 1820, Page 261), the
northwest corner of said Hidden Volley tract, and a point in the east line of a tract
shown by deed to RMB Land Company, Ltd. and recorded In Volume 1900, Page 50
of the Dutton County Real Property RecorQ•;
Thence South 01 degree 35 minutes 48 seconds West, along the east line of said RAf6
tract (Volume 1900, Page 50), and the west line of said Hidden Volley, the west line
of said W. Durham Survey and the east line of sold Gideon Walker Survey, a
distance of 765.76 feet to an Iron pin; said pin being the southeast corner of said
RMB tract, and the northernmost northeast corner of a tract shown by deed to RMB
Land Company, Ltd, and recorded In Volume 1791, Page 117 of the Denton County I
Real Property Records;
I
T
EXHIBIT "C"
(3 of 9)
J.0.087.0020.132 continued
page 3
Thence South 02 dcgreu 33 minutes 36 seconds West, along the east line of sald
RMB tract (Volume 1791, ?age 117), and the well Ilne of said Hidden Valley tract,
and along the well lino of said W. Durham Survey and the cast line of said Gideon
Walker Survey passing at 1737.40 feel a found Iron pin for the northwest corner of a
tract shown by deed to RMB Land Company, Ltd, and recorded to Volume 18£4,
Page 363, continuing along said course, a total distance of 1783.55 feet to an iron
pin; said iron pin also being the southeast corner of sold RMB tract, (Volume 1791,
Page 117);
Thence North 88 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds West, along the south line of said
RMB tract (Volume 1791, Page 117), passing at 2,27 feet tNe northeast corner of
Chaparral Estates (unrecorded), continuing r.long said course and the north tine of
said Chaparral Estates, along and near a fence part of the way, In all a total
distance of 2676,26 feet to an ell corner; said ell corner also being the northeast
corner of a tract shown by deed to John Powell Walker as recorded In Volume 1683,
Prge 689 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, and in a north.
south public road;
Thence South 02 degrees 37 minutes 33 seconds West, along said road, the east line
of said Walker tract, and the west line of said Chaparral Estates, a distance of
1070.37 feet to an angle point
Thence South 01 degrees 27 minutes 09 seconds West, along said road, and the east
line of sold Walker tract, a distance of 1150.19 feet to an ell corner, said corner also
being the northrrn southeast corner of said Walker tract;
Thcace North 86 degrees 41 minutes 58 seconds West, along the northern south line
of said Walker tract, a distance of 205.16 feet to an ell corner; I
Thence South 00 degrees 03 minutes 06 seconds East, along the eastern west line of
said Walker tract, m distance of 422.57 feet to an ell corner on the north right•of•
way line of Shady Shores Road;
I
L
r{ ~ I
i
I
I ~
EXHIBIT "C"
(4 of 9)
3.0.07.0020.132 continued
page 4
Thence North 86 degrees 31 minutes 21 seconds West, along the south line of said
Walker tract, and the north right-of-way line of said Shady Shores Road, a distance
of 587.37 feet to a paint in the east right-of-way line of the M.K. & T. Railroad; said
point also being a point on a curve to the left having a radius of 2387.22 feet, a
central angle of 14 degrees 44 minutes 04 seconds, and a chord bearing and distance
of North 38 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West, 612.22 feet;
Thence In a northwesterly direction, along said curve to the left, the southern line
of said Walker tract, and the northeastern right-of-way of said M.K. & T. Railroad,
an are length of 613.91 feet to end of said curve;
Thence North 45 degrees 54 minutes 32 seconds West, along the southern lit c of said
Walker trac', and the northeastern right-of-way line of said M.K. & T. Railroad, a
distance of :76.93 feet to a point of curvature of a tanbant curve to the left, having
a radius of 1542.93 feet, a central angle of 12 degrees 17 minutes 39 seconds, and a
chord beating and distance or North 52 degrees 03 minutes 22 seconds West,
330.44 feet;
Thence in a northwesterly direction, along said curve to the left, the southern line
of ssid Walker tract, and the northeastern line of said M.K. & T. Railroad, an arc
length of 331.07 feet to an angle point;
Thence Soutl, 14 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds West, crossing said railroad, a
distance of 644.47 feet to a roint of curvature of a tangent curve to the right having I
a radius of 1017.00 feet, A central angle of 01 degrees 25 minutes 05 seconds, and a
chord bearing and distance of South 15 degrees 21 minutes 02 seconds West,
25.17 feel;
Thence in a southwesterly direction, along said curve to the right, an are length of
23.17 feet to a point In the north right-of-way line of said Shady Shores Road;
f
Thence North 80 degrees 14 minutes 06 seconds West with the north right-of-way of
Shady Shores Road a distance of 120.83 feet; 1
i
II
I
EXHIBIT "C"
(5 of 9)
J.0.087.0020,132 continued
page 5
Thence In a northeasterly direction, along a curve to the left, an arc distance of
35.45 feet, radius of 897,0 feet, central angle of 02 degrees 15 minutes 51 seconds to
the end of said curve, chord bearing and distance of North 15 degrees 46 minutes 26
seconds East, 35.45 feet;
Thence North 14 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds East, crossing said railroad, a
distance of 676.31 feet to a point on the northeastern right-of-way line of said
M.K. & T, Railroad and the southern line of said Walker tract; said point also being
a point on curve of a tangent curve t; the left, having a radius of 1542,93 feet, a
central angle of 1 I degrees 34 minuies 39 seconds, and a chord bearing and distance
of North 68 degrees 36 minutes 12 seconds West, 311.24 feet;
Thence In a northwesterly direction, along said curve to the left, the northeastern
right-of-way line of said M.K. & T. Railroad, and the southern line of s,id Walker
tract, an arc distance of 311.77 feet to a found )ron pin for the point of tangency of
se!d curve;
Thence North 74 degrees 23 minutes 31 seconds West, a distance of 215.79 feet to the
southwest corner of said Walker tract;
Thence North 02 degrees 12 minutes 19 seconds East, along the we+t line of said
Walker tract, a distance of 1586.69 feet to a found Iron pin for the northwest corner
of said Walker traa;
i
Thence South 87 degrees 30 minutes 19 seconds East, along the notih line of said
Walker tract, it distance of 1077,59 feet to on angle point;
Thence South 88 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds East, along the north line of said
Walker tract, a distance of 310.85 feet to an ell corner; said corner also being in the
center of Swisher Road, and t;te west line of said RMB tract (Volume 1791,
Page 117);
Thence North 02 degrees 48 minutes 21 seconds East, with the center of Swisher
Road and the west "n: of said RMB tract (Volume 1791, Page 117), a distance of
1504.82 feet to a Iron pin; said pin also being the westernmost northwest corner of
said RMB tract;
i
t
1 ,
1
~f
EXHIBIT "C"
(6 of 9)
J.O.a87.0020.B2 continued
page 6
Thence North 02 degrees 48 minutes 22 seconds East, with the center of Swisher
Road and the west line of said RMB tract (Volume 1791, Page 117), a distance o:
1504.82 feet to a iron pin; said pin also being the westernmost northwest corner of
said RMB tract;
Thence South 87 degrees 26 minutes 44 seconds East, a cag and near a fence, and the
southern north line of said Rh1B tract (Volume 1791, Page 117), passing the
southwest corner of a tract shown by deed to L.F. Powell and recorded in
Volume 853, Page 114 of the Denton County Deed Records, continuing along said
course, in all a total distance of 1655.56 feet to a fence corner; said fence corner
also being an ell corner of said Rh1B tract, and the southeast corner of said Po-A~ell
tract;
Thence North 03 degrees 23 minutes 53 seconds East, along the northernmost west
line of said RMB tract (Volume 1791, Page 117), and the cast line of said Powell
tract, a distance of 320.18 fret to a 20-Inch Post Oak tree; said tree also being the
northernmost northwest oanx; of said RMB tract (Volume 1791, Page 117), and the
southwest corner of a tract s>,vwn by deed to RMB Land Company, Ltd. as recorded
in Volume 1811, Page 346 of the Denton County Real Property Records;
Thence North 02 degrees 33 minutes 27 seconds East, along the wes, line of said
RMB tract (Volume 1811, Page 546), and the east line of said Powell tract, a distance
of 1166.92 feet to a iron pin; sold pin also being the northwest corner i' said RMB
tract, the northeast corner of said Powell tract, the southwest corn r of a tract
shown by deed to Virgina Lee Vaughn Fowler onel recorded In Volume 1636,
page 810, of the Real Property Records, and the southeast corner of a tract shown
by deed to M.R. Jacobs and L.S. Willard and recorded in Volume 1310, Page 110 of
the Denton County Real Property Records;
Thence North 02 degrees 28 minutes 41 secon,ls East, along the west line of said
Fowler tract, and the east line of said Jacobs do Willard tract, a distance of 373.85
feet to a fence corner post; said fence corner post also being the northwest corner of
said Fowler tract, the northeast corner of said Jacobs & Willard tract, the southeast
corner of Green Tree Estates as recorded In Volume 6, Page 30 of the Denton
County Plat Records, and the northern southwest corner of a tr•:t shown by deed to
RMB Land Company, Ltd. as recorded in Volume 1876, Page 190 of the Denton
County Real Property Records;
i
1
1
I
EXHIBIT "C"
(7 of 9)
).O.a87.0020.B2 continued
page 7
Thence North 01 degree 59 minutes 53 seconds East, along the west line of said RMB
tract (Volume 1876, Page 190), the cast line of said Green Tree Estates, the same
being the east right-of-way line of Ash Lane, passing its northeast corner, the same
being the southeast corner of a tract shown by deed to George Stanton, conveyed on
01 March 1974, continuing along said course, passing said Stanton's northeast corner,
the same being the southeast corner of a tract shown by deed to Robert W. Beene,
conveyed on 20 March 1969, continuing along said course, a total distance of 806.45
feet to an x-tie for fence corner; said x-tie also being the northeast corner of said
Beene tract, the northwest corner of said RMB tract, and in the south line of a tract
shown by deed to Raymond Lee Grimes as recorded in Volume 1411, Pagc 654 of the !
Denton County Real Property Records;
Thence South 87 degrees 48 minutes 39 seconds East, along the north tine of said
RMB tract (Volume 1876, Page 190), passing its northeast corner, the same being the
northwest corner of RMB tract (Volume 1876, Page 190), and along the south line of
said Grimes tract, a distance of 1201,48 feet to a point in the west right-of-way line
of said proposed road, sold point also being North 87 degrees 48 minutes 39 seconds
West, 60.00 feet from the southeast corner of the remainder of said Grimes tract, the
same being the southwest corner of sold RMB tract (Volume 1851, Page 928);
Thence North 02 degrees 02 minutes 02 seconds East, 60 feet westerly of and
parallel with the west line of said RMB tract (Volume 1851, Page 928), the same
being the east line of the remainder of said Grimes tract, and along the west
right-of•way line of said proposed road, a distance of 83.39 feet to a point of
curvature of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 1500.00 feet, a central
angle of 22 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, and a chord bearing and distance of
North 13 degrees 02 minutes 02 seconds East, 572.43 feel;
Thence in a northeasterly direction, along said curve to the right, an are length of
575.96 feet to the point of tangency of said curve;
Thence North 24 degrees 02 minutes 02 seconds East, along the west line of said
proposed road, to a point In the north line of said Grimes tract, the same being a
line between U.S. Army Corps of Ergineers Monuments P•239•W asA P-238-W, a
distance of 696.01 reef;
i
i
'w -OW -NmrW
EXHIBIT "C"
(8 of 9)
i
1.0.687.0020,B2 continued
page 8
i
Thence North 82 degrees 32 minutes 32 sc Unds East, along the north line of said
Grimes tract, and the aforementioned U.S. Army corps of Engineers Monument, a
distance of 0.98 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument P-238-W,
TL.-nce South 68 degrees 04 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 309.20 feet to the
Point of Beginning and containing 416.902 acres of land,
j
k
i
i
~ l
i i
i
t
EXHIBIT "C"
(9 of 9)
J.O.*87-0020.B2 continued
page 9
I
87.0020.B3
Carter and Burgess
08 June 1987
LESS AND EXCEPT TIIE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT'
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Gideon Walker Survey,
Abstract Number 1330, Denton County, Texas; said tract being shown by deed
recorded in Volume 1636, Page 840, Real Property Records of Denton County,
Texas, and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning for the southeast corner of the tract being described herein and being the
southeast corner of said Volume 1636, Page 840, Real Property Records;
Thence North 87 degrees 04 minutes 54 seconds West a distance of 225.51 feet to the
southwest corner of said Volume If '5, Page 840, Real Property Records,
Thence North 02 degrees 24 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 386.75 feet to the
northwest corner of sold Volume 1636, Page 840, Real Property Records;
Thence South 84 degrees 47 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 225.59 feet to the
northeast corner or said Volume 1636, Page 840, Real Property Records; II
Thence South 02 degrees 23 minutes 02 seconds West a distance of 377,72 feet to the
Point of Beginning and containing 1.978 acres of land, and leaving an area of
414,924 acres of land. I
E
t
f
I
t
r
i
i
~ J
1
E
I
i
i
F-T
i
10/18/88
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT DATE:
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR PETITION OF HASHMET
WALI, REPRESENTING PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTES OF AMERICA, REQUESTING _
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A DETAILED PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS
CURRENTLY ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD-1). IF APPROVED, THE TWIN
LAKES HOSPITAL AT 2026 WEST UNIVERSITY MAY BE EXPANDED TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL ROOMS. (Z-88-018)
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its August
I 31, 1988 meeting.
I SUNMARY:
The property is located in a low and moderate intensity area. The
proposal would permit the expansion of the existing Twin Lakes
Hospital.
BACKND:
The property is part of a planned development approved in 1964 and
carried over as V,art of Ordinance 69-1 which adopted the current
Zoning Ordi_na_ rice. The original ordinance h
times over t as been amend
he last nineteen years. ed several
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED;
Property owners, City Staff, and petitioner.
i
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact has been determined.
RP; fully sub gad:
Prepared by:
L1 V. Harre]1
fsh ~a~ City Manager
1 Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Appr ;ved.-,, /
r ank H. Robbins
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
08S1o
I
PLANNI14G AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CI'l'Y COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.; Z-88-018 Meeting Date: October 18, 1988
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant; Hashmet Wali
Page Southerland Page
7211 Regency Square Blvd., Suite 202 j
Houston, Texas 77036 i
Status of Applicant: Architect !
` Requested Action;
Approval of an amended detailed plan
for planned development-1 for an
addition to the psychiatric hospital.
Location and Size: The property is 4.849 acres in size
I,
and is located at 2026 W. University.
Surrounding Land Use
and zoning; North - City of Denton North Lakes Park
South - Planned development-5, general
retail
East - Planned development-10 general
retail
West - Planned development-1, general
retail
1
Denton Development Guide: Low and moderate intensity area
i
SPECIAL INFORMATION
i
Transportation:
One driveway from LS Highway ]de
primary major arterial with for the 100 year overflow, cprovides access to the site.
Utilities: Existing 10" water line pro vii '
service. Existing 10" sanitar f will have sufficient capacity j
f
i
(Case Z-88-018)
rage Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Channel improvements were required
Drainage:
with the development of the existing
structure. Drainage information will
be reviewed with building .Mans.
HISTORY
The property was originally zoned local business with conditions
in Ordinance 64-2 and was designated as planned development-1
on the 1969 zoning map and ordinance. The original ordinance
has been amended on numerous occasions altering or eliminating
conditions; however, the planned development status has not been
changed. Two years ago the City approved a detailed plan for
construction of a psychiatric hospital on this site. An amend-
ment was approved in 1987 to allow for additional office space.
ANALYSIS
ahe property is located in low and moderate intensity area
according to the Denton Development
uide. This the site
addi-
of Twin Lakes Hospital, a psychiatric
tion would have only i slight impact on the intensity of the
area.
The additional building would include a maximum 110050 square
feet of building for construction of a new wing for 28 patients.
The pool and recreation area would be relocated to accommodate
the new wing The additional building will also include office-,
a group meeting room, classrooms, a dayroom, seclusion rooms, and
support area.
The property is zoned planned development and a detailed plan
is required before construction could begin at the site. The
detailed plan complies with all requirements of the planned
development ordinance and all information is shown on the
attached detailed plan. The detailed plan meets or exceeds
all requirements from parking to landscaping.
RECOMMENDATION
EPlanning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of detailed
lan.
1
(Case 2-88-018)
Page Three
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with conditions
3. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Detailed Plan
3. Landscaping Plan
4. Development Schedule
5. Ordinance 86-165
6. Ordinance 87-106
7. Reply Form Totals
8. Mailing List
9. Minutes of August 31, 1988, Planning and zoning Commission
meeting
i
pr
r
i
j
i
l
I
0268e E
r
i
I h
V
r ~
i
T-
z 88 018
S
r
g
,
I
f , 1
IL am
L Fr.
►,nlnr fummur
wa
Zoned PD-1 ie, spaces
toned OF-A {
stars B 01 SI' 00' W 824.26' -k
_ j~I I . I ! m
r s.+. l...fl Y 'i,'~.1► rvr
W&K NEW ADDITION y ' i 3 a vi
1
"at
! -N
~ EXI8TIN0 HOSPITAL Ex1421nq 6I011
• ! toned PD
414 k z j # ~I" l
1
I - Nei Slr oo- a o31.1/' L.':.C..•+.
:oroom Fone/ on MI/Inlnp W°II OUTDOOR ACTIVITY AREA SITE DfNTON
o H OI eeekel►eN court
Zoned PD-11 0 swimming pool
- I
z
SITE PLAN u.e. HWY. eeo
$ all v-10o'-6'
j
~v*V-= . {
PAae wurNenLAND PAGE Y LOCATION MAP
Heu/ten,r//// SXISTING SIGN
I
i
Psychiatric Institute Of America
ADDITIONS TO TWIN tk"S PSYCHIATIIIO HOSPITAL k,
Pill D/NTON.T/%AS
Augu°I 4,11111
1
I
Zoned MF-A I Zoned pD-t
I
t } 1, A 1
8 01 33' 00' W 934-21'
yM r 1 p:;. m
• NEW ADDITION - I T7 i f x
H A
P 2 EMOTING HOSPITAL e I - v'' t,r
Eelsllno SIt
t G
w. ~ 2ane6 ►D reel .
y jtIII a ttulpm In 'T o .t - -c _i l~ I
M I ~ A e ^ ..r
a Soreen fence on MatntnS Well
µ I S A A A A~
Zoned PD-1
SITE PLAN - Landscape Development Plan
! BCALE3 1'•100'-0'
I
1 I
Psychiatric Institute of AmerIoa
ADORIONS TWIN LAKE" PSYCHIATRIO HOSPITAL
CENTON,TtXA3
August 4,1018
Twin Lakes Psychiatric Hospital Landscdpe 0evelcpmznt Plan
Symbol Description of Work
A Landscape development already existing on
Project site. All existing landscape planting
shown on plan to remain in place,
B Trachelospernum Asiaticum (Asian Jasmines
i gal, planted at 18" o.c. Erosion control
mesh to be installed on slopes prior to
planting of groundcovers,
C Quercus Vi-giniana (Live Oak) 3" cal.
single trunk, 45 gal, container or equal.
0 Areas to be solid sodded Stenotaphrum Setun-
datum tSt. Augustine 'Raleigh'!, Entire
area to be graded to drain away from building,
E Lagerstroemia Indica (Watermelon Red Crepe-
myrtsej 8'-10' ht. multi-trunk, 30 gal,
container.
F Low shrub planting between building and pool/
basketball court area to be as follows:
Liriope Muscari (Big Blue Liriopa) i gal, planted
at 12" o.c. along the edge of pavement. Liriope
to be planted in double row and 24" in width,
Ilex Yomitoria (Dwarf Yaupon Holly) 5 gal, and/or
Pittosporum Wheelers ,Dwarf Pittosporumj 5 gal.
planted at 24" o.c, along building.
O Betula Nigra (Rirerbirch) )2'•14' ht, multi-trunk
45 gal, container or equal planted on top of solid
sodded areas,
H Ilex Opaca 'Savannah' 'Savannah Holly) 8'-10' ht,
Lingle trunk, 30 gal, container or equal'
I L1 ustrum Texanum (Ligustrum Trees 8'-10' ht,
multi-trunk, BAB planted in a single row and at
least 48" away from building,
Trachelospermum Asiaticum (Asian Jasmine) 1 gal,
planted at 18" o,c, to serve as groundcover plant-
ing underneath Ligust im Trees.
I
DEVELOPMENT STANDARLB
DETAILED PLAN
i. Statement of Intent of Owner:
The Denton Psychiatric Hospital, developed by first Texas Medical/
Psychiatric Institute of America, will be a 16 bed acute care facility
located in Denton, Texas. The hospital will provide comprehensive
inpatient and outpatient services for both adults and adolescents. All of
these programs will have a cormon goal: the return of each patient to a
healthy and productive life with family, friends and co-workers.
The facility will be constructed on 4.849 acres of land, zoned PO-1
(Planned Development - General Retail). The adjacent tract of land to the
east and west of the site is also within P0.1. The property to the south
of the site, located across U,S. Highway 380, is zoned C (Commercial) and
the tract to the north Is zoned A (Agriculture) with the northeast corny-
of the site borderlny on a tract zoned MF-R (Multi-Famlly Restricted).
Currently, the site is occupied by a one story hospital which will be
demolished prior to construction. The site Is a relatively level parcel
of land with no existing noteworthy vegetation. The existing concrete
bridge, over a drainage channel, shall be used as the access point Into
the site from U.S. Hwy 380.
THe proposed psychiatric facility will be a one story steel frame struc-
ture with a brick facade. It will consist of approximately 50,000 GSF,
Parking for 115 cars will be provided furl this includes the handicapped
spaces is required by code. Based on ITE trip generation manual the
projected amount of traffic generated br the proposed facility will be 867
trips per day (using 11.4 trips par bed). An outdoor dining/seating area
along with recreation spaces (swimming pool and half basketball court)
will be provided.
Construction will commence upon Planned Development approval and issuamcR
of all permits required. The construction will proceed for approximabaly
12 .months until completion.
The MOB Addition to the Denton Psychiatric Hospital consists of B
physicians' o!lices, a receptionist-space, a waitinq area, and two
group rooms. These olfices will serve physicians providing sunpore
for the hospital. The construction is the same type as the hospital
and will commence as soon as all permits are issued.
'Ilik aAAttiAn to tha Twtn 1~1,aa PITeA~stA WA~(►.t e•en~(~arA A# i04 Or XAL
DAtiant roams. S eflieam. 2 lroua raaL. IL ellaaraasa a "y r , ",luatan
rQAls. l aLLlll Itll tall, and ak;40, tawat -~a a.•nlart alaraa. AIAQ. an •••.l Aa er Z!! •I•X
ti.-~_~.~ ice.
-ar a e Lac U" l avilftls abet awd 1.ai[ h. kathatt re.rr w0l hA hutts. tw
rs91aes the axistiae aetivitr ar". Tha eAlatrn..r fww is thA =-A1 as tha
/xistinll hospital and will covesence as soon as all paralts are issuad.
I
~r
pwa+vyminc acar~~u.+..
r,qe 2
I
2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Dwelopmest Ouidee
no project Is located in a low and moderate latensitY aree It's we mould
A
be compatible.
3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed District
4,83
4, Lan! Oses and Total Number of Acres In Bach Parcel or Tracts
Total proposed Acreage
s, single fully Detached
b. Single Vastly Attached (townhouses, cluster, ate$)
of Attached,Patio/649dea/tato Lot Line
d. Duplas
to Nulti•haily
to Office
I g. Melgbborhooi •erHa
bo geaer4l1e4611
if Commercial
i. Light iadnstrial
k. Bury iadwtrial
1. Other )spadify) Institutional
I
C+velopment Standards
Page 3
S. Off-Site Inforsation - adjacent or surrounding land uaes, toning, streets,
drainage faCilltifa, and other existing of proposed improvements,
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
fading areas, access points, (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Pro
11.4 Lrinelbad jected Traffic ceneraticn, (Based on traffic Study, it required.)
■ 11.4 x I04 t 086 Fxiatin + Addition
7, Buildinge7
as Approximate location. (Shown on concept at detailed plan,)
be Maximus heights
24'-10" A.F.F.
c, Miniama setbacka$ (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
r
d. 'Maximum gross !loot area (squats feet) for aoncesidentialt
022 for Additioa
(4,62310 r total building
e, Residential subdieisiont M/A
` as Nwdwc of units per acts (deasity)t
I
be Mumbec and locatloe of lotsa (s)hows N ceacept or detailed plan.)
a. "thin" alai, wid" and depth of lotas iel10,1411 on concept or detailed plan,) ~
d. Mialaan front, side sad me yard setbacket (Ohm oa concept of detailed plan.)
~I
i
Crvelopment Standards
Page 4
9. Water and Drain 494 - approximate location of all existing or
• proposed creeks,
pondso lakes, floodpleins, other water retention or maJor drainage ed creaks,
facilities
and improvements. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
'a$ Utilities - location of all maJor sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
lie Location of trees 3' In diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
12a Open Space - location and site of greenbelts, parks, common and recreational areas.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
13a Screening - location, type and sine of all fences, berms or screening features.
(Shorn on concept or detailed plan.)
11. Development Schedule (concept plan) - shoring speclfio date detailed plan will
be submitted, date to start construction and complete coastructiono and rate of
development. All dates should ladicate month and years
' f
i
i
I
ADD3$O" RINIU MS MR A DiIM1,90 PLAN
lye Landscaping Alas - mater featured and types of laadmospimg to be ussds
-14jer to Landscang Plan
i
geveloMent StdnOards
page g
i
16, Signs - show location# type and site on detailed plan, othecwiae, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the inning Ordinance.
,Refer to Plan
17, Sidewalks, (Shown on detailed plan.)
Is. All information required for prsllminarp plat in accocdance with Appendix A
(Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances, (PIA/7171 Addition)
(A separate plat is required.)
19, Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rate of development, All dates should indicate month
and year.
_Addition Startm Am aaan as BMMIII§ immt
Additina Ointd.m rahru&rv felte
I
r
1
I
f
l
ab
7/17
ANANF ORDIOR NANTNCEB OPLF TANNHEFDCIDETYVELOPMENTOF OENTON,ISTRTEXASCT
PL
I, AP APPAOYING A DETAILED
N
DPROVED BY OROINANCI
O. 69.1, AS SAID PLAN APPLIES TO 4.4 ACRES OF LANI) LOCATED AT
ZOZS
HEREIN ES PROVIDINGITFORA DRIVE, MAXIMUM PENALTY RTOfUL11 000.00 8 FOR
VIOLA? ON$ THEREOF= AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of DENTON MEREIY ORDAINSi
SECTION I.
attac a hireto eandsIncorporateda hero incrby°dreference, Aavln;
been :owed as a Planned dereloppsent "PD" by Ordinance No. 09.1N
there is adopted the dotal are plan shorn In Exhibit "R•', attachad
Aerete and Into r orated harela by reference, in accordance with 11 of A Ordinances, So tbtetethereafter thi°uoix ad °devel of he ofdsaid
land shall be savermed by and be in accordance with said plan.
UM N I Dp
or'fallsQ°toocomplystherewith tat awith rsay of the requirem n s
thereof, or of a yeralt or certificate issued thereunder, shall
be guilty of t% alideseanor punlikable by a (like net exceeding
doomedh0guilty ofllarsepara~te0offense for eachhandritaryhday be
portion thereof dueing which any violation of this ordinance Is
committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such
violations such person shall be punished within the limits above.
m NI
That thi days froo. the datenof Its hpassage°aandithe City fourteen (14)
hereby directed to cause the eappttoa of this ordinance to be
newspaper of 1the City of Denton, Texas, CWithinltoo (10) days of
the date of Its Passage,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of l9fe.
K, 't boo
JXAS
CITT O DEtiTatl, ITOT
ATTISTt
UfV DYIi TON 'rir
, TEXAS
DIHLIAA ADAMI AS TO LEGAL FOAXj
CITY Of OINTON, TEXAS
IYI
I
f
I
£RBIBIT "A"
FIELD NOTES
All that cartltn tract of Ilnd situated In Me Robert Beaumont Survey,
Abstrect Number 11, Penton County, TuA1i 14191 d tract Iito being 1 It Selo. t
$ hO wA byy dasd t0 flr4t Tfias Medic 1l, (nC. rcordld in Y01 am4 1261
Page 11] of the Denton County 8111 Prooerty Records, OAnton County, Teals,
and being more fully l41Crload is fallovl:
84ginAIMg for the southwest corner of she tract b%'Ig described heroin at
0 0 l i t l said First
T!aMedical tract, AndtheSOUthe+stCOrAjP Of I tract ShOVMby dead to
NO C. Baruch is recorded In VQIW" L441, page OS of the Ofnton County
Roll Property Records And 1130 being 111 the north right-of-way Itne of
U.S. Nlghway 406er 7601
Thence Korth OL degroel 11 11nutel Eut, Along the welt line of laid
First Taal Medical trlet, and the felt tine OF told Baruch tract 1
distinct of 931.19 fast to M Iron DIM for OR northwest corner a; the
hlreln delcrlbld rrtct; l4fd Iron pan 4110 being time northwest corner of
said first tests Radical trectl
Tn4nce SOVth 84 degrees 18 linut4s 01 uconds list, along the north line
?f laid First Tecas Medical tract, a dlit+nce Of 227.81 rut to an fron
pin found for the northeast Corner of the heroin described tract; laid
Iron DIM also being the northeast Corner of laid First Tom Medical
tract, Ind 11 the rest line of a tract Shawn by load to 0. R. wilklns" Al
recorded In ;nt„me 145, page 118 of the Denton County Oud Records;
thence South 01 degrees 11 minutes west, along tht lilt line of laid
tract, and the Veit line of laid wllktnlon tract, passing wllklntonlt
louth„elt Who?, 04 same 041111 the northwest Oar nor of Sat 1, Block 1 of
the Act Will an is reearded In Cabinet C, Slide 110 of the Denton County
Plat Records, In 111 a dlstrance of 924.28 feet to An iron pan found for
the s0uthfalt corner of the heroin doiCelbod traCtl sold Iron DIM Ilia
being the louthaslt carrier of said First Tom Medical tract, and in the
nirti right-of-way tine of said U.S. Ktghway Number 1809
' Thence North 89 degetol 22 Minutes 41 second/ welt, along the Louth Itne
of said first Tales Medical trett, and the north right-of-way line of gild
U.S. Highway Rumbor 180, A dtltante of 221.10 Fast to the Point of
i Beginning and containing 1,819 acres of land.
The undersigned does hereby certify to Psrthf4trlt Inltlt4t4s of byrita 1
that the otat here" 13 bas" on an Actual lurvty Made On the ground 21
ADrtl IM and that tt is o true, correct, And Atdurate rapre4estatlon of
the property is surveyed, that there are no wlslblo and +Opuant on"Ats
uc"t as %have on told 0111, that the Quanta of lard twill lids been
4eeuretelr Wculat", and that told property A+s Access to a raaf.ay
unless otho ias noted.
This flit and field Motel were prepared for the feciully use of the
person Fort4Ms, or entitles Method In the above certificate. Said
O4etifIcats 4041 not utand to any unria/gd person without AM 440regi
recertification by the surveyor AJOIAg gild Dorton.
14 May 1044
Joy roan, 4g ! Ore
public Surveyor No. III?
Z-1819
f
EXHIBIT "B"
DETAILED PLAN FOR 4,849 ACRES OF LAND CONSISTING OF;
1. Project Description;
2. Site Plan (1 page);
3. Larascape plan (2 pages);
4. Preliminary Plat (1 page); and
1 S, Utility and Drainage Plan (1 page).
t
1 .
i
Z•1819
~ i
i
i
J
DENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
HXS Project No. 3191
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Denton Psychiatric Hospital, dev
c t C Institute Of eloped by First Texas Nedical/
loatedinDenton$ Texas,~Thechcswit1 be 1 76 bed acu!e care facility
inpatient and outpatient services for both provide cmprehensive
these programs will have ,
Common adults and adolescents. All of
healthy and productive life with f90& 1
' the return of each patient to a
The facility will be constructed on 4, Yfriends and co-workers,
(Planned Development - General Retail)849 Theradjacentntract of land to the
east and west of the site is also within p0. ' . toned Pp.l
of the site, located across ll. S, H1 hway 38D,IsT=oneaoce(C
the tract to the north 1s toned A Y e the south
of the site borderin (~9r1cu1ture) with the northadstacorneQ
Currently, the site ~sooceupfedtbZoned MF•R (Multi.Famfly Restricted),
demolished prior to Construction,y The site is aorelativelicleve)1 be
of land with no existing noteworthy vegetatips The relatively
bridge, over a drainage channel y parcel
existing
the site from U.S. Hwy 380, , shall be used as the access pointrinto
The proposed psychiatric facilit,yy will be a one stor
Lure with a brick facade. It wf11 consi a r y steel frame
Parking for 115 cars will be provided sfor;t this of is Includes pp °xi ma udes tely the $0,000 GS GS
spaces as required b code, F,
ed
Projected amount of by Based on ITE tri
trips per da ° traffic yenerated b p generation manual, the
usin ed
along with Proos
dlninity will be 867
will be provided, g pool and 4aif basketballacourtjrea
Construction will commence upon Planned Development soproval and 1%s1J11c4
I of all permits required. The construction will proceed for appr3xl,,at,al
12 months until Completion.
y
i
I
f
I
l
r M ~•r N
. r~M~pM
r
r ~
` ..w r.ww.r• Lr•
/ :'IKw'r! .wwru•«{:..:~.1 fill ti
t3um Li>; wrr r •r.r~w•wi _ '
J
• ( f*C 1
n~ N11e pts" r~wr•~~
JJ►► i
~
.0 ='rrili'.~~ r
M'
OUR
Tc-'Us 63
{':~~5 ' SSL•'L ~w
boom Bob* an
i
M
°EMtw ~'wno ~an~
POA "Am "J"
REVISE
F
Irl
Am jwww#A*d,
Akof
w ~ wry 1
1
\ i
1 ~
~ I 4F
'1 • \
•
1
PLANT MATERIALS LIST
Shade Trees
Live Oak
Red Oak
Cedar Elm
Chinese Pistachio
Goldenrain Trees
Ornamental Trees
Bradford Pear
Yaupon Holly
Crapemyrtle
Purple haf Plum
Eldarici Pine
Shrubs
Fraser Photimia
• Nandina
Junipers
Indian Hawthorn
Owarf Crapemyrtle
Savannah Holly
Groundcovers
Asian Jasmine
Junipers
Owarf Hollies
Owarf HA.1horn
,i
f
i
f
i
i
1
i
•..r rw wr Yrf 1.1 1-
ttt
_ r11L3r[LpYYLaV 1, 1! 1 - r.
~i I.1 ~ 11•~~ \ +11~
rN•i r- 11I~•.11. ` w«~r "~~f , now. wrrwwonotoo,C
111 r--+ 1 TL---I! r♦•. M I rM.
I~ 1 'Kr
Ia r1~yr Ir4Y M~ W~1 , rri 1_~ ` I i yr•~w. w31't• w~~ r 'aomwvn ' ~ If♦M 111 1/•fw .f /wC •IIIMI "we 19•1 `r ~Wr 1
I--, rl!{4{ L ~ ~ ' '•~1 I
r r ~fw- •n a ~
M f I
"Now rs r , r l F•r.
y. 1 .Ir ~r.11 \ ~I •/I,. , r
r
lr _ _ 1
~PL ><r•rn.f~~ I•II•+•f Y{Y' iii i''riiw
a./11•I / .M .Mo. •`Jet ~ y
~I ♦..}N7 fir
rr ~1
j pf f.1 I
J !!w1.~!! "
r. , r
1
L•.r RI r
clyL nrrllL lr.
"Mumma" kv
• ~ 1 _ •"r-•- RLA•/F.f~1.~U~OfYflION l
rrldrh ■1/ rr {-fir n i 1 f♦ I• li ti r. j1• nI nln 4M#onI~ .••1• •I a - ~ jy !~14 - IF - M Iw N ~ ! ■ }
_ ~I~w•jwl wl •n . q~~ ~•rr..y
4!■L 11 Ir ~ ? ~ ? t ~}r .r rww Y wr rr..~sra•.
e1 +ul
T ~>tlt
V ti-; . _
J 4 ~ ii 'k
1
NOW
wF, / 1
w,
OLL
"we po.f
i ♦w r ` 1 11 +1I
~ e
II 7 a _ ter. w~~'Fa~~sra a ~ is !1..1'~jy .~1T~1 ' ~ [i-.•~.- 1 l
1«,aYar
nll. urr. - i
i .i
Y a.. Nw'.r1 ~w.YV.i. _w.'.rw...+. A_~ • .'..n.. \.w. rwYA~ .Y. ~'_iwMM..~.Yy..
Mz~
C'. rzrttm*z=~
FY ~r./...•._.~I~~1.1YYi.
M.Y.: ww1`~.:~:i~r:Y~i IN"Yi ~•.R...y.~•.1.~'~~
YI ~ M gllwl„A~,^q~~
F F.M.i
I YM. w.a, rr Y
~w Y..IY..wM
w
I
1~
l 8 4 5 L ~G A!i i:i /u-- .4 i~
N O .,f
Q
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 86-165 'r0 PROVIDE FOR AN
AMENUED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DETAILED PLAN FOR 4.8 ACRES OF LAND
LUCATEU Af 2026 WEST UNIVERSITY DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM
PENALTY uF $IUUO.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 86-165 provided for approval of a
detailed plan for a hospital within a planned development zoning
district containing 4.8 acres of land located at 2026 West
University Drive, as more particularly described therein; and,
Archittects,,hasPsychiatric
petitionedInstitute
amendment America, the represented detailed
plan; and,
WHEREAS, at a public hearing held on May 130 1987, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the
petition;
NOW, THEREFUKE, THE CUUNCiL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORUAINS:
SECTION r. That Ordinance No. 86.165, providing for the
adoption T-a detailed plan for the planned development district
therein described, is amended by the approval of an amended
detailed plan for the district; the amended detppai be plan being
reference ~xsobthatB,nereafter attached the hereto district In cor
shallorated e suoject nand
governed by the amended detailed plan herein approved,
SECTION .11. That the detailed plan attached to Ordinance No.
86-loS as Exh bit "B", is repealed.
SECTION III. That a copy of this o:dinance shall be attached
to Urd nance No. 86-165.
i
SECTION IV. Any person who shall violate a provision of this
ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the
requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued
thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine
not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($10000.00). Each such person
shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for
ea
` da ch and ever
ordinanceportion
committed ~forduring
continued$ ands uponviolation
ction f of this
any
such violations such person shall be punished within the limits
above.
i
f l
r
SECTION Y. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen 4 days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this
ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle,
the official newspaper of the City of Denton. Texas, within ten
(10) days of the date of its passage..
PASSED AND APPROVED this the, ~r -day of 1987.
A S , MAYOR
CITY DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
N, a w k , CI[Y S LkZ-rXRY--
k CITY UE~ ON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCIt, CI'PY ATTURNEY
CITY OF UENTUN, TEXAS
by:
I
i
I
{
I !
1
r
'1
F I E 1. 0 N O T E S
All that certain tract of land situated in the Robert Beaumont Survey,
Abstract Number 31, Denton County, Texas; said tract also being a tract
shown by deed to First Texas Medical, inc. as recorded in Volume 1264,
page 313 of the Denton County Real Property Records, Denton County, Texas,
and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning for the southwest corner of the tract being described herein at
an iron pin: said iron pin also being the southwest corner of said First
Texas Medical tract, and the southeast corner of a tract shown by deed to
Shaul C. Baruch as recorded in Volume 1443, page 05 of the Denton County
Real Property Records, and also being in the north right-of-way line of
U.S. Highway Number 380;
Thence North 01 degrees 33 minutes'East, along the west line of said
First Texas Medical tract, and the east line of said Baruch tract, a
distance of 931.19 feet to an from pin for the northwest corner of the
herein described tract; said iron pin also being the northwest corner of
said First Texas Medical tract;
Thence South 86 degrees 38 minutes 01 seconds East, along the north line
of said First Texas Medical tract, a distance of 227.81 feet to an iron
pin found for the northeast corner of the herein described tract; said
from pin also being the northeast corner of said First Texas Medical
tract, and in the west line of a tract shown by deed to G. R. Wilkinson as
recorded in Volume 345, page 148 of the Denton County Deed Records;
Thence South 01 degrees 33 minutes West, along the east line of said
tract, and the west line of said Wilkinson tract, passing Wilkinson's
southwest corner, the same being the northwest corner of Lot Is Block 1 of
the Ace Addition as recorded in Cabinet C, Slide 330 of the Denton County
Plat Records, in all a distrance of 924.26 feet to an iron pin found for
the southeast corner of the herein described tract; said iron pin also
being the southeast corner of said First Texas Medical tract, and in the
north right-of-way line of said U.S. Highway Number 380;
Thence North 88 degrees 22 minutes 41 seconds West, alongg the south line
of said First Texas Medical tract, and the north right-of-way line of said
U.S. Highway Number 380, a distance of 227.70 feet to the Point of
Beginning and containing 4.849 acres of land.
l
I
I
i
i I (1
i
EXHIBIT "B"
DETAILED PLAN FOR DENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL,
CONSISTING OFs
1• Detailed Site Plan (1 page);
2• Landscape Plan i2 pages); and
3. Development Standards (4 pages),
f
I
}
2-1854 (PD-1)
t"
I
ww.clNW wr f
1 ! f~
- ~ •r; wnw w. woe r rw.u
r•mr wrw.ruww .\\J I i
I 7!'~
tt
wrr r r. awo mr Ywwr wrww f - _ _ . -
rlru 'nr Ylm
T YN.a merry ] - Mi w.a awrr
' ~ I Il~ll I11t1 Ill flll ww l _ i _ - 1 \ I N~ w.• ~
y N•
h11 ■ ■ f ~ 1~~11)., - Ill lw~l ■.m
1 r 1--J 1
n
lM M. ■ .0..
rr•u.r~.
V,N bw ~ wee
L__J _ C_ _ J
® olSITE PLAN
SITE DENTON
rr.r..rZ'L" r"•Sr. r•
w.Y7rir.rwlJ..+r y, Y.r r+«w $ -u----7
ri T.rYwr ~ r •m+ 1~ yy
w MY V • YrIM1I .err M w
nrrl .wrr.m L ~rr r.N .■ff4
IM~.rMl r.rr~ir..r Y.MV
ar•m rw~rr '
Iw.• Y.^_■w•}~r'~.~r Y•r~rrV ~~~~Yw~
PIA 3 r+rrrr.wr. rx4 r new .rr
iiw +~i`~•r Lw•rrwr~.i r.Z.7'r.~ ~ w
{
Iy.wr~rr y+i r .r~•w~~:wr Nr w.+h 1 4W04M Y1 i
• rn. wM aY.m
' 1wA pr4lti+. ni~~Mr.~. ?
'•~~i wir n r'i.. w~+r it +
It$'% !a'1Ji4tI€~ Of_-Ake;
DENTON FSvC f TFIC HOSPITAL
OFNI01t nxm
I
1 ~
'f
I
all
ar h
r•
~ p•r,s(btr
-tuft
ww~r~„Rrr ~ t
AA,
-it
w.w v air rnw ' ] f
+ru~ V
1
I
PLANT MATERIALS LIST
Shade Trees
Live Oak
Red Oak
Ceder Elm
Chinese Pistachio
Goldenrain Trees
Ornamental Trees
8radford Pear
3 Yaupon Holly
Crapemyrtle
Purpleleaf Plum
Eldarica Pine
Shrubs
Fraser Photinia
Nandina
Junipers
Indian Hawthorn
Dwarf Crapemyr0 e
Savannah Holly
Groundcovers
Asian Jasmine
Junipers
j Dwarf Hollies
Dwarf Hawthorn
f
I
i
i"
1
F
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Carlo J. Farina, Jr.
5201 N. O'Connor Blvd.
Suite 360
Irving, TX 75039-3702
E
i F
i
-07
Z ~ ark ~4 • Ftr! YlJ an~~du~actf..~
7/409/ n.r H /i..,.ttrpC)
rQLO Cor/wrahori /we,
_ 9/7 ravr»Cf, _
ds~rfoh, Texas, ,"~?o/
~//y0~/ 8524 - 00/~p fif+st % 'dS C/.~~eJ✓
f!w /ow ,//00/ (c
PO &-W 201a
lls~isr~Y/e , 7X. X5'067
9G+~gx~2v8 we.& 111D FCC../s
~w v po ei~r Zi/o5
3.r/ya// 8S?oov5ao .Stisv/ c, ,S,,rcrs,
'/o `/104*,6x 72owoi /Pie
.
15051 220//mot , SwYc ~Zs'o
'Ji/1st , ,e , 952yb
15701 N. DGs+K-M~GC &4.0, 4vilC s
/rvri/7 , Tx, 750 3q
/F/ x/07/'r/ %I(orflr c'~tFelc
Gfy Ole W/en.
/ ~,~v . 8stb arao 41cb/~ fn/a~wiidP
Zion /05
Au ~ CAK//MG'Nd/ SHkJ~rGS
Mov 11r uw,iwstf/
Lt1 iaU
Zdlor!l #A-tO4 ff Q~,
y25 fry
awfc~ ,'1Sr, ?U2ar
I
i
i
P62 Minutes
August 11, 1988
Page 4
RECOkIMENUATIGN: Ms. Carson stated the only way that the
ty cou mit land uses was with a planned development.
Any use sreclfied in the toning district would be permitted
if the light industrial toning was approvtd. She said that
some of the uses were undesirable since U.S. Highway 38U
was identified as z major entranceway into the City. She
said that a possibility would be for the landowners to get
together and submit w request for the total area. Staff
recommended denial of the toning change to light Indus-
trial.
Mr. bngelbrecht asked If the petitioner came to speak at
the Development Review Lommittee meeting. Ms. Carson
stated that they did not though the staff comments were
sent to them.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Jester said that he was In trial at the
t me o the URC meeting and was unavailable to attend.
He said that they could not ask for a planned develop-
ment since they had no plans for the property. He said
that they would accept a commercial toning.
Mr. Morris stated that a new toning petition would have
to be s,bmltted and propertyy owners within 200 feet of
the property would have to be notified before commercial
toning could be considered by the Comalsslon.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Ms. Bruck said that the property was discussed
at the Lakevlew public hearing and she felt that too such
intensity was used in the moderate node at U.S. Highway
580 and Lakeview Boulevard. She said that she sympathized
with the land owners in the triangle but that the light
Industrial toning would cause problems for the area.
Mr. Kamman said that he felt it was too open ended and he
did not feel ii ht Industrial uses were accepLaFle i,i the
area. Mr. Enge~brecht agreed that it was too open ended.
Mr. tamman moved to recommend dental of 2-88.017.
Seconded by Mr. Eagelbrecht and unanimously carried (6-0).
C. 2-811.018. Consider making a recommendation on the
pe on of Hashmet Mali, representing Psychiatric
Institutes of America, requesting approval of an smen!-
went to a detafle! plan. The property is currently toned
planned development (PD-1). If approved, the Twin Likes
Hospital at 2026 Ocit University ■ay be expanded to
provide additional rooms.
Nina notices were mailed to propertyy owners within
200 feet; two rtply forms were received in favor and
ono was received In opposition.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the amendment to the
p annT-ed-development was proposed to permit an addition to h
the existin~ psychiatric hospital. She said the proparty
was orlglna ly toned local business with conditions n
Ordinance 61.2 and was designated a planned development-1
on the 1969 zoning map and ordinance. She continued that
the orleinsl ordinance has been amended on numerous occa-
sloes altering or eliminating conditions; however, the
planned development status has not been changed.
Ms. Carson said that two years ago the City aprroved a
detailed piton for construction of a psychiatric hospital
on this site. An amendment was approved In 1917 to allow
for additional office space.
I
P6: Minutes
August 31, 1988
Page S
She continued that the property is located In a low and
moderate intensity area according to the Denton Develop-
ment Guide. The addition would have only a slight impact
on the Intensity of the area.
She said the additional building would include a maximum
11,OSU square feet to accommodate 2a patients. The j
and recreation area would be relocated to the west side of
the lncI ude hospital. additional
space, a groufmeeting room, Classrooms, ao
day room, seclusion rooms, and support area.
Ms. Carson stated that there are some concerns with
drainage and, if approved, drainage information will
be reviewed with the building plans. Cre added that
the parking and landscaping P
PETITIONER: Hashmet Nalt, architect for Twin Lakes
osp to stated that they felt they were complying with
all the needed requirements.
tN a FAVOR: Ms. Oe addition Betsy was Guthry, a children~saunit, Sheosaidtthat
the hospital had determined the community needed an area
for this type of care.
OPPOSED: None Present.
RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Carson stated that staff recommended
approve o t e detailed plan.
Ms. Brock stated that 11.1 trips per bed per day seemed
high. Ms. Carson stated that it was the existing standard
and that it included employees and trips Involved in the
operation of the hospital.
0.EBUTTAL: Hr. Nall stated that he believes that the
acts gips per day are less but the standard was used
rather than calculating an existing trip factor.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Holt moved to recommend approval of
Seconded by Hr. Glasscock and unanimously
carried (6-0).
D. . Consider making a recommendation on the petition
L-rT
o"ale Irwin requestin`` a variance of Article 1.09 of '
the City of Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Mulatlons at Carroll Boulevard and Highland Street.
s property is further described as 0.927 acres in the
Nilllam Loving Survey, Abstract No. 7S9. Article 1.09
requires the extension of a sewer line across the full
width of the development lot In accordance with the
Hester Sewer Plan for the City of Denton.
Five notices were mailed to abutting propert/ owners;
none were received in favor or In opposition.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Evans stated that the petitioner is
reques n t + variance of a sewer line extension for the
Otte nbacker Addition. She said the Offenbscker Addition
oua portion dofljhlinEosi°eeplat located at Carroll
Ss
She sold that according to Article 1.09 of Appendix A
of the Code of Ordinances, S'lbdivi%Lon and Land tevel-
opment Refutations, sewer lines " shall be required
to extend across the full width of the development .
I
FIE_0 4 0 T E 5
All that certain tract of land situated in the Robert Beaumont Survey,
Abstract Number 31, Denton County, Texas; said tract also being a tract
shown by deed to First Texas Medical, Inc. as recorded in Volume 12640
page 313 of the Denton County Real Property Records, Denton County, Texas,
and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning for the southwest corner of the tract being described herein at
an iron pin; said iron pin also being the southwest corner of said First
Texas Medical tract, and the southeast corner of a tract shown by deed to
Shaul C. Baruch as recorded in Volume 1443, page 05 of the Denton County
Real Property Pecords, and also being in the north right-of-way line of
U.S. Highway Number 380;
Thence North 01 degrees 33 minutes East, along the lest line of said
First Texas Medical tract, and the east line of said Baruch tract, a
distance of 931.19 feet to an iron pin for the northwest corner of the
herein described tract; said Iron pin also being the northwest corner of
said First Texas Medical tract;
Thence South 86 degrees 38 minutes 01 seconds East, along the north line
of said First Texas Medical tract, a distance of 227.81 feet to an from
pin found for the northeast corner of the herein described tract; said
iron pin also being the northeast corner of said First Texas Medical
tract, and In the west line of a tract shown by deed to G. R. Wilkinson as
recorded in Volume 345, page 148 of the Denton County Deed Records;
Thence South 01 degrees 33 minutes west, along the east line of said
tract, and the west line of said Wilkinson tract, passing Wllkinson's
southwest corner, the same being the northwest corner of Lot 10 Block 1 of
the Ace Addition as recorded in Cabinet CO Slide 330 of the Denton County
Plat Records, in all a distrance of 924.26 feet to an iron pin found for
the southeast corner of the herein described tract; said from pin also
being the southeast corner of said First Texas Medical tract, aid In the
north right-of-wa/ line of said U.S. Highway N;mb4r 380;
Thence North 88 degrees 22 minutes 41 seconds West, along the south line
of said First Texas Medical tract, and the north right-of-war line of said
U.S. Highway Number 380, a distance of 227,70 feet to the Point of
Beginning and containing 4.849 acres of land.
i`
2-88-018
I ,
V
EXHIBIT B
DETAILED PLAN FOR ':WIN LAKES PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
1. Detailed Site Plan (1 page);
2, Landscape Development Plan (2 pages); and
3. Development Standards (5 pages).
,I
i
I
f
2.88-018
C r
i
f
k
I
I
hAln~ tuwwu,
m
ZMed MP-R Zoned PD-1 :"C
148 trite.
I
wave ' +I • r I. 8 61 22' 00' W 924.16' (iS'- r ~1 1 •.r.._..,, ! ..w ..r f
L..~~.. ice': •r..~ ~.,w , _-_I] .I o
..tires - 1 ~
V
tnu WIN AOOIT1011 1-J al. b ` S i S
am pom
!ALI
'
1L, CIA
- -
i EXIiTIkIG NOfPITAL - Al
sw0 ro - - ; _ i Ealulnp 6b,
Pow - s
1
"Aa
l
1 M ft • 1f' E f2L1~ f-'^'LS.~"'- rr ^ r- , r,~. r:'
airs Fee" on WalrAnE WON
OUTDOOR ACTIM'rV AREA sITE ocNroN
3 too" 110-1 ONIII NOkOtMN Courl ~ - i
SITE PLAN o EMRiliiq Pool
"wV 1'•1N~-t' ® Y.P. Nwil Nt
~ 1 1
PA" EOUTIILIILAW ft"
iI NwouR,toea EXISTING SIG4 LOCATION MAP
I
Psychiatric Institute of America
ION 0 TVAN LA(!6 PSYCNATRC NO4PtAl
pN E1 jI C C E 19' ED r~ u G $
1989
1 Aapuil 4,1111
f
i
I ~
zoned Yr-R
I Zoned PD-1 A `
8 A A I - }
! 8 e1 11' 00' w 614.r4-
_=r~ :'lY::
/ '1.6.'11 w
~ ~ti tin ~ T' ~ . ~ r ~yN ti '
lil r+ G P ^ E%18t7N0 N08NtAL
zoned ~D f= _ - _ La• 5 r
ftw
A IT
} A BueeR Feaee on IMIIIMIG1 We11
eb ff I J
zMed "-I A ^ A A
SITE PLAN - Landscape Development Plan
:cALc1 r-ur-a•
k Psychiatric Institute of America
rr ADOITIONS TO TWIN LARI/ ►/TCNIATRIC HOSPITAL
ff
M _ I' cr OIRTON.UXAS
PIA4Aupuel 4,u11
1
I
i
I ,
I
fain Lakes PsycniatriC Hospital Landscape Development plan
Symbol M cription of Work
A Landscape development already existing on
prJJect site. All existing landscape planting
shown on plan to remain in place,
9 Trachelospermum Asiaticum (Asian Jasmine)
1 gil, planted at 18" o.c. Erosion control
mesh to be installed on slopes prior to
planting of groundcovers.
C Quercus Virginiana iLive Oak) 3" cal.
single trunk, 45 gal, container or equal,
0 Areas to be solid sodded Stenotaphrum Secun-
datum (St, A,,gustine 'Raleigh'). Entire
area to be graded to drain away from building.
E Lagerstroemia Indica tWatermelon Red Crepe-
myrtle) 8'-10' ht, multi-trunk, 30 gal.
container.
F Low shrub planting between building and pool/
basketball court area to be as follows:
Liriope Huscari (Big Blue Liriope) 1 gal, planted
at 12" o.c. along the edge of pavement. Liriope
to be planted in cauble row and 24' in width.
Ilex Vomitoria (Dwarf Yaupon Holly) 5 gal, and/or
Pittosporum Wheelerl tDwarf Pittosporum) S gal.
planted at 24" o.c, along building.
6 Betula Higra (Riverbirchi 12'-14' ht. multi-trunk
45 gal, container or equal planted on top of solid f
sodded areas.
H Ilex Opaca 'Savarsah' tSavannah Holly) 81-10' ht.
single trunk, 3O gal, container or equal.
I tiqustrum Texanum 10 gustrum Tree) 8'-i0' nt.
multi-trunk, 868 planted in a single row and at j
least 48" away from building.
Trachelospermual Asiaticum (Asian Jasmine) I gall.
planted at 18" o,c, to serve as groundcover plant-
ing underneath Ligustrual Trees.
f
~h
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DETAILED PLAN
1, statement of rntent of Ovnetl
The Denton Psychiatric Hospital, developed by First Texas Medical/
Psychiatric Institute of America, will be a 76 bed acute care facility
located in Denton, Texas. The hospital will provide comprehensive
inpatient and outpatient services for both adults and adolescents. All of
these programs will have a common goal: the return of each patient to a
healthy and productive life with family, friends and co-workers.
The facility will be constructed on 4.849 acras of land, zoned P0-1
(Planned Development - General Retail). The aijacent tract of land to the
east and west of the site is also within PD-1. The property to the south
of the site, located across U.S. Highway 380, is zoned C (Commercial) and
the tract to the north is zoned A (Agriculture) with the northeast corner
of the site bordering on a tract zoned MF-R (Multi-Family Restricted).
Currently, the site is occupied by a one story hospital which will be
demolished prior to construction. The site is a relatively level parcel
of land with no existing noteworthy vegetation. The existing concrete
bridge, over a drainage channel, shall be used as the access point into
the site from U.S. Hwy 380.
The proposed psychiatric facility will be a one story steel frame struc-
ture with 'a brick facade. It will consist of approximately 50,000 GSF,
Parking for 115 cars will be provided for; this includes the handicapped
spaces as required by code. Based on ITE trip generation manual, the
projected amount of traffic generated by the proposed facility will be 867
trips per day (using 11.4 trips per bed). An outdoor dining/seating area
along with recreation spaces (swimming pool and half basketball court)
will be provided.
Construction will commence upon Planned Development approval and issuance
of all permits required. The construction will proceed for aoproximately
12 months until completion.
The M09 Addition to the Denton Psychiatric Hospital consists of 8
physicians' offices, a receptionist space, a waiting area, and two
group rooms. These offices -.$ill serve physicians providing support
for the hospital. The construction is the same type as the hospital
and will commence as soon as all permits are issued.
Th. addltlen tie ehs Twice AkAd LAVCM riw llw.slti7 eeeaia a of earl pri~at.
Qatiaat ragas. S offieaa. 2 sreue veer. a elaaaree.a - d ; 2 aarluaien
[goes, a euran atattne, and add:r4n ~i. ar„M-eti-E~ eu_ 1lm_ aw ma1!Annr_aee XUj
araa CO in[iude l avisrlee eeei tad %&I f a WhAI I eA rr X117 A t Ott to
replace the eftiatill activity ar ♦ r ens r fee ie t!L tree as th.
•xisticl hospital and vill coeesnce as won as all parzits are issued.
4 .
I
I' ~
pevel~Fmenc opal.
page 2
2. Statement Indicating Aslation to Denton Development Guide,
The project is located in a lov and moderate intensity area. It's use would
A
be compatible.
3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed Diattictr
4. Land Uses and Total Number of Acres 10 Bach Meal or Traotf
Total Proposed Acreage
A. Single Family Detacbed
b. Single family Attached (townhousese cluster, etc.)
C, Attached Patio/Gatden/fetO Lot Line
d. Duple:
of Multi-Family
f. office _
' q. Neigbbotbooq wwwo
b. Cameral Retail
i. CoMoteial
Ligbt iadusttial
ke leavy tadastelal
If Other (specify) Institutional a.at
E
r ~
M
~ k
{
i
1
f
r
f ~
i ~
C<velopment Standards
Page 3
S. Off-Site information - adjacent of surrounding land uses, zoning, streets,
diainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
(Shown on concept cc detailed plan,)
is Traf*lc and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
loading areas access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on ttafiic study, if required.)
11.4 tries/bad . 11.4 x 104 - 1,086 (Existing + Addition)
7. Buildings$
A. Approximate location. (Shown on concept oc detailed plan.)
bo Maximum heights
241-10" A.F.F.
c, Minimum setbacks: (shown on concept of detailad plan.)
d, Maximus gross floor area (equate feet) foe nontcsldentialt
11,050 for Addition (Patiaat Wine)
64,625 for total buildine
S, Residential Subdirislow N/A
a. Nuatber of unit's per acre (demsity)t
b. Numbec and location of loins (shows an concept of detailed plan,l
e. tllnlsus sisio Mth and depth of lots: (show on concept or detailed plan,)
t
f
f
d. Minisus ftent, aide sad teat yard setbaairat (Show oa concept or detailed plan.)
w 4
I
Development Standards
page 4
gs water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing cc proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or aaJa: drainage facilities
and improvements. IShown on concept or detailed plan.)
10. Utilities - location of all major sewer, water at electrical lines and facilities.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
11. Location of trees 3e in diameter - six (b) feet from ground level.
(Shown an concept or .,tailed plan.)
12. Open Space - location and size of greenbelts, packs, common and recreational areas.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
13. Screening - location, type and site of all fenced, bersw or screening features,
(shown on concept oc detailed plan.)
11, Development Schedule (concept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will
i be submitted, date to start construction and emplets construction, and rate of
development. All data should Indicate month ,:ad year.
AOOMIOMAL 12"IRMWNTS rM A DIIAILRO PLAN
i
F
13, Landscaping Plan - mayor features and types of landdcapiaq to be usede
Refer to Landseaoa P Ae
i
i
1
nevelopment Standards
page 5
16. Signs - show location, typo and sire on detailed plan: othQ9vise, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the Zoning ordinance.
Refer to Plan
17. Sidewalks. rShown on detailed plan-)
19. All information required toe preliminary plat in axordance with %ppandix A
(Denton Development Code) of the Code of MLAO-ncss. (PIA/Fill Addition)
(A separate plat is required.)
19. Development Schedule (derailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month
and year.
AAAlrinn Fintahr Fshr+ury 1989
t
f
ab
1/17 '
f
s
2498L
NO,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED DETAILED PLAN FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, CONTAINING 4.8 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED AT 20.5 WEST UNIVERSITY, AS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT
OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 69.1, the City Council approved a
planned development district 4.8 Tacre wins of la d located
at 2026 West University (presently k Lakes ;
and,
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 86-165, the City Council approved a
detailed plan for the district, and by Ordinance No. 87-106,
approved an amended detailed plan for the district; and,
WHEREAS, Psychiatric Institute of America has made application
the present facility; detailed and,an so as to
for an a taexpansion amendment of to the current
provide for the
WHEREAS, after a public hearing the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval of the amended detailed plan;
NOW9 THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That for
heretoh 4.849 acres being
Exhibit "A"7the same land included in that planned
there development
hereby appoovedd
established by Ordinance 64-1 (PD-1)
the amended detailed plan attached 6 rato as Exhibit IT' and
incorporated herein by reference, so that hereafter the property i
shall be detailed constructedg plan herein approved ained in accordance with the
amended SECTION Ii. That Ordinance No. 86-165 and No. 87.106,
respect ve y providing for approval of a detailed plan and
amended detailed plan, are hereby repealed.
SECTION III. That any person who shall violate a provision
of t e or nance, or fails to comply therewith issued
the requirements thereof, or of a permit thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine
3
not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), Each such person
shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every
day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordi-
nance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such
violations such person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen TI~Filays from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this
ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle,
the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten
(10) days of the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1488.
FLAY STEPHENS
i
i
ATTEST:
A
JENNIFER WALTERSI CITY SECRETARY'
5
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
r
BY: ro.
E
i
C
i
f
I
,i
t
L.,
4
III
I
I
I
I
I~ I
TTI=
MEJZLIJ
s
El=
f
El=
E
44
f
1
f
"vim
I
N
I~ DATE: 10/18/88
CLTY COUNCIL REPORT_FORMA_T
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council/
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJ3CT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR THE PETITION OF DALE
IRWIN REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DETAILRD PLAN AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A
` PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY
{r ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD-108) AND TWO-FAMILY (2-F) ZONINO
DISTRICT (Z-88-010)
BACOMMENDATION:
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its
September 28, 1988 meeting by a vote of 6 to 0.
9UMMARYI
The request is an amendment to an existing planned development and
I change in zoning from two-family to planned development for office.
{ The property is In a high intenetty area,and the Carroll Boulevard
Policy applies.
KGR
BACOUND:
a
The Clty ounoll approved a planned development for office use at
the northeast corner of Carroll Boulevard and West Prairie Street in
1986.
F OA GRAMS. LPARTMENT9 OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
I
Twenty-six (26) property owners within 200 feet were notified.
t
I $ISCAL IMPAC ;
i
No Impact has been determined.
r i
Res fully dub t dt
Prepared by: Llo V. Harrell
City Manager
a Cecile Carson
i, Urban Planner
APp `
1 ~
rank H. "Robb'Ine
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
2323
i
`F
f
It
1
I,
1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION To CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: 2-86-010 Meeting Date; October 18, 1988
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Dale Irwin
419 S. Carroll Boulevard
Denton, Tx. 76201
Status of Applicant: Owner and Representative
Requested Action: Amendment to a planned development
(PD-108) and a change in zoning from
two-family to planned development.
Approval of a detailed plan for
office use.
Location and Size; 1.353 acres located on the east side
of Carroll Boulevard between Highland
Street and West Prairie Street
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Office and residential
South - Day Care Center (S-162),
residential
East - Residential
West - Multi-family-1 and planned
t development-231 (office),
neighborhood service
i
1 Denton Development Guide: High intensity area
` J
SPECIAL INFORMATION I
Transportation: The property has frontage on Carroll
Boulevard, a primary major arterial,
j and no curb cuts are proposed on
Carroll Boulevard. One access is
proposed on West local/residential Pstreet, Sand e a
one
access is proposed on Highland Street
which is designated as a collector
street.
I
i
(Case 2-88-010)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATIUN (continued)
Utilities: Existing utilities are adequate for
the proposed use including water,
wastewater and electric.
Drainage: on-site drainage will be directed
througiz access easement to collection
inlet on West Prairie Street and
drainage will be piped into existing
storm sewer in west Prairie Street. I`
HISTORY
A planned development was requested by Dale Irwin at the
northeast corner of Carroll Boulevard and West Prairie Street
and approved by City Council in 1986.
A public hearing was held on September 140 19880 and the Coin-
that Council;
mission recommended approval
staff request determined City
somc
meeting of
property owners within 200 feet of the zoning request were not
notified. A second public hearing will be necessary before the
item can be forwarded to the City Council.
ANALYSIS
The property is located in a high intensity area. A major
activity center was created in the downtown area to support
and preserve the unique character of the city. The Denton
Development Guide states that emphasis should be placed on
governmental offices, banking, specialized retail and similar
employment centers. An intensity standard was not established
by the Guide for high intensity areas but instead the policies
state that growth should be measured by adequate public infra-
structure. The Guide continues by stating that support should
be given to growth but a commitment must be made to residents
that their neighborhoods and local streets and facilities will
not be disrupted by unplanned major activity centers.
The Guide contains a specific area policy for Carroll Boulevard.
The policy states that maintaining Carroll Boulevard as a major
north-south arterial is a "high priority". The policy also
states that duplexes and small scale multi-family and office
could be supported along Carroll Boulevard under "very limited
conditions" including "(1) site design to protect adjacent
single family requiring such things as screening fences, large
setbac.cs, landscaped front yards, sign controls, etc.t (2) site
(Case 2-88-010)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
r
design to insure good off-street circulation and parking and
very limited curb cuts in order to minimize traffic disruption
on Carroll Boulevard; and (3) input from adjacent neighborhoods
prior to a decision".
In regard to these conditions, the planned development zoning
district provides the most control available to implement the
design conditions. The proposal includes a landscape setback
along Carroll Boulevard and protection of existing trees. No
detached ground signs will be permitted. Screening is shown on
the landscape plan and a condition recommended by staff will
require screening fences or evergreen plantings in addition to
existing vegetation to create a solid screening device. No curb
cuts are proposed on Carroll Boulevard. The petitioner has
indicated that he has or will be discussing the proposal with
the neighbors and 3s usual this is a difficult area for staff
to analyze. Overall, the proposal appears to meet the Carroll
Boulevard policy of the Guide.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval with the
following conditions:
1. screening along the eastern boundary shall include the
planting of evergreen shrubs between the existing vegetation
to create a solid screening area or by a 6 foot solid wood
or masonry screening device if the vegetation cannot be
planted on this property. Screening plans must be provided
with building plans and be in accordance with ordinance
88-104. Screening must be completed prior to the issuanc
of any certificate of occupancy, e
2. The protected tree indicated in Phase lI must have a
permeable area under the entire dripline of the tree as
specified by Ordinance 88-104. Removal of adjacent parking
spaces may be permitted in order to accomplish this
requirement.
I
M TERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
3. Deny petition
'I
r~
' (Case Z-88-010)
Page Four
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Detailed Plan
r` 3. Landscaping Plan
4. Development standards
` 5. Ordinance 86-61
fl 6. Reply Form Totals
7. Mailing List
8. Minutes of September 28, 1986, Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting
I
i
i
i
i
E
~I
08380
}
r
~ ,1
Z 88 010 "OAT"
.a
ion ~~l III ~
~°a°aoog°~ ,D~a~~D~ -
~ FoODD D C
ooOAK ~
oil-
E~GIf
FT LN
,
lteceivEn SEP a 1 1989
Lr I..I~L r
1D
s
lOCAT10N MAP
I ~
Yp^ 1
r
I- Nk
Norm INS"W slaw
me I.F.
I i
• • 8 LAO 1 l.~,r. i
1
r M
1 W I, ells a •.tn. r 1 i 1 ,
wlw~uoln W+rr
1 arw
C./1 1 IIOLL LAM 1. aalwl Iw•II6I Ittlm Ol
riser Mu N Y RI.
S. /r IRAY awn i /tlt IA#
POLLCA/UM awl I
wall ~ A IM ilN
Ull 882AVO.
t /u lnt OVA" ML r
insTS TO M Mm m l
fFl 1MIA INOWN Mr. ItIC I'
MCW FIA*ll 111 03U
0
wr,n tI•~.
/AAKIN6 IMM DEVELOPMENT scW. t OKNEP
IIYt 1 A" t~ MYt I IMAM-ALT 1, IM et/{[M-im"W 1, am I~Lt L•'I• IwTMaJ01 Y13=4 C.Mr1T POe,
1w 3.0 C..
MR tt wlwr.a l•lrr 1. lr 0•Rl1t Yt 1. aw as Cjjl ~yt•MI "I p
3" 0.0 lal
7~i f d IIMII~r• s NOIw Ir , b
oAA Aaal wo6iilov
emw urrn r arnK raW j
wr 1Yl.Ir aWa. i I
I
1
RBCEIVBD SEP 0 1 1988
--REVISED--.
M N ,
1 I
li LOCATION NAP ....................r
am rir nw alul w real
I
` ( ~ wMr ar Iia al.r w r♦r
Rat
Tw /tar IIM l.1,
uRar M Ron I
~ ltl/ ~ ~ 1 >Dw 1.0'. / NI I.I.
twML
I a m I m m 1J} I/ tall /
i 1
xW
♦ ~~n xelb.Ma~I~1~Ix l.u
~~~~rrrr~~ .11 IN{W ♦1~y .xIN.11
aw.l1♦y [Y NnrlWr.rN ~r[III .N~il.l
~OII.LVAIC ♦ [~.""~'~•i ii~.rNiriii~il:[[
i ♦ .O Iu.N4.x Wy1 Y IINV.I '
is U.11 11 1 ObI 1..[
~MI.IIINH MI W W S F~
' • .u ~INnx l.[I[ r.w w Inl
I.. Ixu♦ 1 1 f . 1
IIM'.I Yt1 NMnIS . N
i.ry N1~111SH~ xl,I..lM1wn l[M
Y N 1.111y
UPI NINI Itli HNgIW
nor ~ 1. IM 111r
tL:1t«': J'S::T.1:a n.u.7 i
W QLr JEOA A AY
r~+a wrlM~ t ~r1101
OkNER w ,IM
WOAWL9
tiff W Wr l1" ~«lit ~
71 Y~FNa ~L
1, IVI' rYl W MIA
i
6
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DETAILED PLAN
Z-88-010
1. Statement of Intent of Ownett
To develop ro ert in single-story and twa story professional office buildings
i
1, statement indicating Relation to Denton Development Guides
The orooenyis ntxt door to exiatintolanned develoySnt for office use--
Add -emmplla• vi h D n nn Day lnnmen ailog
7
3, Total Number of Acres in Proposed Districts
1,,253 acres-.
14 Land Uses and Total Number of Act*$ in Each Parcel or Tracts
Total Proposed Acreage
a. Single family Detached
b. Single family Attached (tovnhousesr cluster, ate.) Co
Attached Patio/Garden/loco Lot Line
d. Duplex to Multifamily -
f. Office 1.353 acres
'
i
g. Neighborhood Service
h. General Retail
i
I. Commercial
i. Light industrial
k, Heavy Industrial
1. Other lspecify)
i
.
1
1
)
w
Development Standards
peg.
S. Off-Sits Information adjacent or surrounding Lind uses, Toning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or Proposed improvements.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
6, Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
loading atlas, access Pointe. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) -
Projected Traffic Generation. leased on traffic study, if required.)
7, Butldinges
A* Appeoxisats location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
be Kaxisum height:
Two story
e. Minimum setbacksI (Shown on concept of detailed plan.)
Blvd. Right-of-way
d. Maximum gross floor area (84uafe feet) for nonresidential:
Lot 1 - Two Story - 3300 SF Phase 11- Two Story - 6750,;''
Lot 2 One Stor-I - 3000 SP
Lot 3 - One Story - 2560 SF
1. RegidantiaA Subdivisions mA
4 s, Number of units per acts (density)i
be Number and location of 10"I M em oa concept or detailed plan.)
4 -
Ca Nlnlmum siset Width mad deptb of lots: (Shorn on eoncepb or detailed plan.) l
i
do Kinimum front, side and teat yard setbacks (show on eoncspt or detailed plan.)
1
Development Standards
Page 2
5. Off-Site Information - adjacent or suirounding land uses, soning, streetap
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed Waste, parking lots,
loading areas, access pointee (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.)
7. Buildingst
a. Approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
b. Maximum height:
Two story
c. Minimum estbackst (Shown on concept or detailed plan,)
25 feat from Carroll Blvd. Right-of-way
d, Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidentialt
Lot 1 - Two Story - 3300 SF
Lot 2 -,One Story - 3000 SF
Lot 3 - One Story - 2560 SF
A, Residential Subdivisions NA
i
s. Number of units per acre (density)3
i
b, Number and location of lots (Shown on concept or detailed plane)
i
c. Minimum situ width and depth of lotst (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
d. Minimum front, side and rear yard setbacks: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
I
Development Standards
page 3
9. Water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or major drainage facilities
and improvements. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Curb to be provided on East side of parking lot per Engineering Dept. recommendation
10, utilities - location of all major sever, water or electrical lines and facilities,
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
11, Location of trees 3' in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
IShown on concept or detailed plan.)
12. open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parks, common and recreational areas,
IShown on concept or detailed plan.)
13, Screening - location, type and size of all fences, berms or screening features.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
11. Development Sch~Aule (concept plan) - showing specific data detailed plan will
be submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of
development. All dates should indicate month and year.
I
J
I
ADDITIONAL RIQUiRENSNTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN
i
3S, Landscaping Plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used.
See landscape plan
I
E
a
i
N ,
Development Standards
page 1
lb. Signs - show location, type and site on detailed plans otharwlee, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the zoning ordinance.
Wall Signs (No detached signs)
V. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.)
` 18. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A
(Denton Development :rode) of the Code of Ordinances.
(A separate pint is required.)
19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month
! and year.
I Start Date - July 1, 1989 .
_ Complete Date - January 1, 1990
F
i
i
t
i
hh
1 t
r
ab 3
3/17
•
I`
i
NO. f ° I
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING HAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE $0. 69.1, _
AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 0.426 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNEA OF CARROLL BOULEVARD AND PRAIRIE
STREET AS IS MORE PARTICULAKLY DESCRIBED HEREEN; TO PROVIDE FOR
A CHANGE tN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM TWO-FAMILY "24" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD"
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $1,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND
PROVIDING FOR Ali EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the Zoning Classification and Use desi nation applicable
to all or part of the propp arty described in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and incorporated by reference herein, is hereby changed
from. Two-Faailyy '2-F" District Classification and Use to Planned
Development "PD" District Classification and Use under the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION 11.
That the development and use of the district shall be in
substantial compliance with the Exhibit "B" site pplan. attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, subJett to the
following conditions and restrictions:
1. The district shalt be limited to office uses.
1. No detached signs shall be permitted.
3. Building height will be limited to no more than two
stories,
4. The areas shown for laadaeapplng shall be landscaped
prior to the issuance of Asy certificates of
occuppancy, and shall thereafter yDa maintained in a
coed tics substantially comparable to the original I
installation,
S. The building shall be of a maximum floor area of
6,130 square feet.
SECtZON Imo,,
The Zoning Map of the City of Deatoo, Taxes, adopted the
14th day of lamacy, 1969, as as Appendix to the Code of
Ordinance of the Clty of Deotoe, Taxes under Ordlaaaem No,
69.1, bas and the sane is hereby "ended to show such change in
District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions
and specifications.
MUCH tv,,
That the City Council of the Cit~I of Denton, Taxes, hereby
finds that such change is is accardance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
the district and for its
other things ~or the character of
peculLac wiu bility or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encouraiing the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum bona it to the City c Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance,
or fails to comply therewith or wtth any of the requirements
thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding
One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Each such parson shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or
p,)rtlon thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is
committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such
violations such person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION VI.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14)
days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the edition of this ordinance to be
published twice La the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspapat of the City of Denton, Terris within can (10) days of
the dare o9 its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED chLs the day of 1986.
4 C1T 01 0 YTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
1
f
ALLLL4 girl au; T
fY 0 DVMN, 0TgJW
APPROVED AS TO LECAL TORN:
DESRA ADAM MAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNtY
CITY or DLNTON, TUAS
BY:
2.1110/PACE 1
I
EXHIBIT „A..
TRACT OUR
P IOLO MOMS TO 0.474 ANIS IN TWa MILLI W IUVIIC SUIY4Y. ABSTRACT
VL0011 COVIRrY, T11A3.
At I. TWAT CIIT411 TRACT 01 ►ANIL Of L406 6I1VAT40 IN TIN MILLIAm
I UV40U ANIVI1, AILTSACT 119, 011tO0 COWOV, MA$. 14140 PART li►
TWO TRACT/ NsCOLSW 11 A 040 ►11N II404T L. WW11, It UI TO 11W
4. Maid as T4 10111 OAT OS 11AK11. 1904 01CO1110 to WL11144 19,
PACs 1t4. AN VOI.LVM 100, PACI M, OR/e IsCoug of 1411 CW1TY. _
441 11110 Wit FVLI.T ORSCRIRIO AI POLL01161
oulaiM4 AT TMs MOIMAST C61a4 or 1410 flu Ismal 11ACT AN
1,04,11140 10 VOL M► it, PACt 116, OCR! I/C11RN Or Wit COUNTY, AM
IRON PIN IN IVA tAll 110NT•Or•106T Of P•4t614 sf1C411
rusts IN" 00 0441111 IA 03/11/14 11 suowl BAR? %LAW A MCI
A 1111AAIf.I Of 154.94 Fall TO Ad Ik4 PIN IN ► CALLA 11 NO[
A1111t
716MA NaTN it 0104111 19 NIOMS 41 1000ON WRIT ALAW 4411
ALI.►T A I60TAWS 01 IIt.l1 t1tT t0 Y IRO PIII
INLICO LLMT% N ONSUS I/ 11IAN1TIS 57 SICOM WNT, 10 FAA? /1M
AM FAMALL416 WIN TWA Ulf CW4 IV CAIIOLL SOKIVA". A 111f4M4
(I► I11.20 P4s? W AM 1010 Flat .
fNAWCS "ITV N begins 41 miffmi It sual" BAST ALOW IN
sUUro 110M.01i14T Or PIASII4 $"UT A 0111AMC1 of Ill.)) PUT 11)
fit roll? Or 10 imiaC AN CMTAtelog 1.414 AC111 Or LAN.
TIM? T41
►tll.1 AMR TO 01141 AC1ss 11.111 WILLIAM LOVt10 wavcv, ANtsal
I 119, ga" CON 0, "1".
ALL TINT C4TAIN TIACI 04 PASCAL OF LAM SIVIATa1 111 Tee WILLIAM
LIIVIW SUMIl ANTAACI fill, Is"" CMrTT, TUA1, M1a1 A PART
Ur A CMAl1 (CALLA) O.ITt ACY 141? 14001 N $AMIN L. NOM,
M T AL TO MA CI FT OF Oft M, "I" M TIM 1IN M1 Of M41146111.
1069 1101ANS1 Is VOLUM 4N, to" IM, som Am"" Or wS
,uUNTT, AN 11101 PM19 PVLLV UIUIMS AS POL6M$S
104111NIMs AV /MS r1R111Wt NMN OI 1411 0.1►t AC11 raml A
P01111 LI. T\e MIN MMUN LABS OF West 04111, 11"1111
rarI1CA Ian a 11111p to N11r?n 11 100011 AAif A 011fAMC1 01
111.11 001 N A MIN If A CALNO 10 FART ALLSVI
town 11111 N oauu 1t Atom 41 own" W111 A 111TAms of
4.0.0 P4r M AM IAN Pill
IBM" lam N bum" 10 NIW"A 51 IIMIM11 WsT, II 11m 01011
AN FAIIALLAL WITS VII SAS? CWp M M U WUVW, A 8161AM66
OI 11111,61 FM M AA INl till
Tulle 110fr 419 O"un 41 111pR11 11 IN"" LAST A OISTANR 01 i
00.1 P611 TO IN FOIST a IISININ AM 4Y0fAf11N 1.141 11Y N
2-1110
I
1
I
I
J
V
E:'HIBIi "B"
_ - i--PRSR,E - S'REEr - - -
.
i sum I
-of alto,
s" ~
_ I
r e ~ I
I 'I
I c
i
t
1
2.1774 e
41F NOW -Iww~
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCI
Z-88-010
IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
IN FAVOR
Marvin Wills
607 S. Locust
Tom D. Jester, Jr. P. 0. Box 280
Dale Irwin
419 S. Carroll
William J. Anderson, Jr.
2713 5th Avenue
Fort Worth, TX 76110
~Y
r
~k
L
l
.
1M~ N i
~1 F
itt
II
t
l
1
1
f
f
II
i~Je G YJ/~7 7~ /Of.;
Nio A/yk/eird
7t ca/o»~ iT, xZa/
r~/3z/ Na~r<o/ 3e~~rh r'iN~r~r
~ ~srJo~ , ix, ~ozv/
Awe
T
~p
~ 720 /!~//araf
t
g/?il/ y2~etao So/ ~5as r~1rt~ l~lr6. G(J~feY /~i//
ZorS Grark,+~x/ .
vmlon zvo/
q~ ~tZl ~fY~an $ 51 Cxrclcra ~ r/r~kaeN f
r~iak~ ~~af / I
a
12I% 40{'3
1m;oAn-ap 52y r~/?anr/0 &4,0 6~elfer/7eyers
Z 7x,4
13 /~YyylG ~ !x. 962ZCe
i
'~I: l~ 32/ ~/'1$R70/v0 ?3 his Idle trio;,
-am eo~,eoll
7A 0 k-n i T.r. X-W/
$ / y?'~~/ (C+~li.~i&kr~ /BUJ 5ca~e
t l
L 'L ~i0R9?st~ yid W, i~XiC ~iLV'6 Cl/1n,1~/rs ~ij
yi7 kJ. l~vArie
~ G 3 ~/t'~v~ 4// w, ~,~►k IIsvrin F k.+//s
l aON~, /X !V ~I
j
r7~ K.I3„~2 y3900/90l ~rao qp~s /.Y . 4*,a
l3'3N g25o Ao~So Nickinan Cli~~liclfP/ I,
,I
cl~ 320 g2ao•cbSav Uv~sy N. GtXr~'~e
!(ol/ Lervre/akx/ '
t7urfvN 7X,-22.go/
ii
3
3 cf 3
~l3tD G~h o~ 7cK~ lGbf Gai«~{sry
Z/,~ e{Zrfo oo2a~ pr9 r1r~ti~~d
1
G J'[~I~ Gr~ o~ flen~ '
f 3'
J f yr5-~l~~ 11[pc~lend QIfVCdo
ql5-qr t ~rrrAla+rd
!Q 71h~» Ix 7Gio1
w
G
rfl3~ yZ~oooso! Uiirar► M. Wh.`z
~(or! 1.diYelw~
- ~ ~ur~ort 'TX 7~oZW
nr
n w
i
E ~
T
k
J
r i
~ I
}
1
I
4
I G
i
r
I
J
~ •d
i2I~ 2 ~ -OrV CO,rvfr r~'rce i~~ . 1 o•F 2
,t)o/c'. iNa>< are ~+ona! ~Na-s of ~?rvfa,
NddCed NN SWO ON NAP
Ici{I'31( ~$iGYl7yo0 ~ t~.~lictk Nm'Jn F lclr%/5
ya5 w, r`1-jri~
' ~tt~~t 7r ?G1ca/
' li/2 s2z N?oa~z4~ 03 sfrac+r~ /~ci~rl F Nar•svn IZ
I 2 Tar &i ~ l4
Arky1G ~Tx. ~i2zG
ro~
!>l3~frt Nuc~~ol y275/n~r/
l , iJAI"
iX 7Gto/
7~3
Cvf~'~3s2 y2G~/a/ ~ vJ~~`o ~
~fS/3t2 '/7G~O~o/ orb A}6 Shed 'erm L f .Lc~rr
s e)6 Hren.E "PSA l
Letotsrrr~l~ / ~ ~
Via /I1G wmp/ *0 0 AW4 k.41/la4M v. TWO' ON JN•
r 27/3 co Iw. 11
I ~f. 6tbr/lt , T, 76!/G
n1st2 41~&OOWJ Atiy A), Prsrrc JQnn C. 'd/drY
6020 VAMOA Z1'
uysi ~
` lirf?L otunr;o/ ql~ W. ProriC ~J~flryL,T/<!i«
ylt/ W, ~rbrC
'l7esrr(m -rko, logo/
J2I ~ Z ~ 010 c~ijirwu/ r~'f° 2 of Z
~ lI.B. SN+idh r
13I.i W, 322 ~ yal q1~ w Awie
l7tc~ fVZ~ / 7026?
I?drG C~YW,N
' 15~32Z ~2(cGblSol N!4 5. csr~al~ Pilu~
T)c 7&w l
!G~ lit
ra~ . , nNays ter.
l3l~J>t cl3~vvrso~ qw s. Carrot! 3!►~I E
- _ ~7i c•~ +ovt TV, ~G Lo r
~S?OOl~ol po fjox 2+n
1-4 lit.
g T_... __'C~rrrrt. ✓cA'efs Uv, led. :h
q~4l2 ; fti?da1?a~ 4,6 ?wt tai"""j~
eomel
m _ 1~64/mj 71r 7620!
i
N
I
B RR A F Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
September . 1988
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
city of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, September 28, 1988, at
S;aS p.■., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Euline Brock, Ivan Classcock, Judd Holt, William hamman,
Etha Kiker, and Fran Morgan
Absent: Jim Engelbrecht
Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning
and Development; Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator;
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Owen Yost, Urban Planner;
Jc: Morris, Assistant City Attorney; Rick Svehla, Deputy
City Manager and Executive Director for Engineering;
Lee Allison, Senior Civil Engineer; Rene Baker, Civil
Engineer; and Olivia Carson, Secretary
Chairman Euline Brock called the meeting to order.
1. Minutes. It was moved by Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Mr. Aamman
an unanimously carried (6-0) to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of August 31, 1988.
]I. Consent Agenda
It was moved by Ms. Riker, seconded by Ms, Morgan, and unani-
mously carried (6.0) to approve the consent agenda as follows:
A. Approval of preliminary and final plats of Logan Addition,
Lot 1, Stock A.
B. Approval of final plat of Denton High School No. 2
Addition, Lot 1, Stock A.
C. Approval of final ptat of Denton Nigh School No, 2
Addition, Lot 2, Block A,
111. Public Bearings
I
~ A. 2.88•010. Consider making a recommendation on the petition ;
o Date Irwin requesting approval of a detailed plan and
establishment of a planned development toning district. The
property is currently toned planned development (PD-108) and
two-family (24) toning district, The prortrty is located €
on the east aide of Carroll Boulevard between Prairie Street '
and Highland Street. If approved, the property may be
utllited for office use.
f
26 notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; j
eight reply forms were received in favor, one was received
in opposition.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated the request was presented
at t e oam ssion's last meeting and approval was recom-
mended. Staff determined that some propperty owners, with-
be no0questionaofntheblegalltyfofdthedublicdhearin`,ttree
nequsst has been placed on the Commitslon's agenda again.
PETIT10NE0.i Dale Irwin, 119 S. Carroll, stated that he is
atteip`tTn, to zone the property from duplex to office list
allowing three buildings of 1000 square feet each. The
land is currently vacant. The choices for the development
j of the property were multifamily, strip retail, or office,
i
i
P62 Minutes
September 28, 1988
Page 2
Office was determined the best use because there will be no
curb cuts on Carroll, which the other uses would create,
and because an office use is consistent with other develop-
ment in the area. This development will be an attractive
D a` a asset to the city with 3S foot greenbelt setback. All of
D the large trees can be saved. A hedge will screen the
adjacent property. Mr. Irwin stated that office use is the
6 I highst and best possible use for the property. It is a
sensible use and will be occupied by local professionals.
Ms. Brock asked if there will be a sidewalk along Carroll.
Mr. Irwin said yes.
IN FAVOR: None Present.
OPPOSED: None Present.
RECOMMENDATION: Ms, Carson stated that staff recommended
approve o t e request with the following conditions:
I Screening along the eastern boundary shall include the
planting of evergreen shrubs between the existing veg-
etation to create a solid screening area or by a 6 foot
solid wood or masonry screening device if the veleta-
tion cannot be planted on this property. Screening
plans must be provided with building plans. Screening
oust be completed prior to the issuance of any certi•
flcate of occupancy.
2. The protected tree indicated in Phase II must have a
permeable area under the entire dripline of the tree as
specified by Ordinance 89-104. Removal of adjacent
parking s aces may be permitted in order to accomplish
this requirement.
Ms. Brock asked If any progress has been made on the boun-
dary dispute voiced at the last meeting.
Mr. Irwin said yes and that he has met with Ms. Patterson,
the lady who was concerned, and she Is now in favor of the
request.
Ms. Morgan asked how the development will effect drainage.
Ms. Carson said that drainage improvements are being
required and that the development will not worsen the
current drainage situation.
I
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Holt moved to recoamend approval of l•88.410
with the recommended conditions. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock.
Mr, Kamman asked if the petitioner had been left a choice
between a hedge and a fence.
Ms. Brock stated that the condition requires a 6 foot solid
fence to be built if vegetation is not possible,
lotion carried unanimously (6.0).
0. 2.67.02A. Consider making a recomeendation on the petition
o ep els Interesu, Inc. requ a Ling an amendment to
Planned Development•6 and approval of a detailed Vsn on
S.T acres. The property is located along the north side
of Wilderness Street, the east side of Iimberidge Street,
and the west side of lenwood Street. The property is ppart
of the Mary Auotin Survey, Abstract No. 44 and the R. H
Hopkins Survey, Abstract No. 1694, and is included In The
Woodlands of Township It Addition. If the detailed plan is
approved, the property may be developed into single flan
lots with 6,800 square feet.
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED ZONING • CARROLL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT
/or DALE IRWIN
TRACT It
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the William Loving Survey,
Abstract Number 759, Denton County, Texas; being more particularly described as
follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 1 Block 1 of the Offenbacker Addition, as
shown by plat recorded in Cabinet C, Page 14 Plat Records;
Thence South 00 degrees 23 minutes 16 seconds East with the west line of said
Offt;nbacker Addition a distance of 61.53 feet;
Thence North 89 degrees 03 minutes 41 seconds East with a south line of said
Offenbacker Addition a distance of 2,94 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left
with it radius of 1930.00 feet, a central angle of 06 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds,
and a chord bearing South 06 degrees 29 minutes 37 seconds East 236.18 feet;
Thence with said are a distance of 236.33 feet to the end of sold arc;
Thence North 88 degrees 37 minutes 4S seconds East with the present north right-
of-way of Highland Street a distance of 62.32 feet;
Thence North 00 degrees 23 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 218.60 feet' to the
most southerly southwest corner of said Offenbacker Addition;
Thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 7331 feet to the
southeast corner of said Offenbacker Addition;
Thence North 00 degrees 34 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 76.98 feet to the
northeast corner of said Offenbacker Addition;
Thence North 00 degrees 49 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 62,02 feet to a
point in the south line of a (called) 18 foot alley conveyed to the City of Denton
and recorded in Volume 99, Page 230 Eked Records,
Thence South 89 degrees 39 minutes 41 seconds West with said alley a distance or
73,47 feet;
Thence North 00 degrees 43 minutes 43 seconds West a distance of 9,03 feet to a
point in the south line of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Fred Moore Addition as shown by
plat recorded In cabinet F, Page 118 Plat Records;
Thence South 89 degrees 39 minutes 41 seconds West with said south line a distance
of 88.77 feet to the southwest corner of said Fred Moore Addition;
Thence South 00 degrees 16 minutes 27 seconds West a distance of 70.36 feet to the
Point of Beginning and containlag In all 0,927 acres of land,
Tract IN
i
Lot Is Block 1, Fred Moore Addition.
f
I
EXHIBIT "B"
DETAILED PLAN FOR 1.353 ACRES FRED MOORE ADDITION
AND OFFENBACKER ADDITION CONSISTING OF:
1. Detailed Site Plan 11 page);
2. Detailed Landscape Plan (1 page)l and
3. Development Standards (4 pages).
1
i
1
4
r
I
jl
f
1
Z- -88-010
T
SEP o 1 1988 ~,1; r"
r I
toc►na MP ~ ~ " • ~rti~
_.v ViY~~/11.W 1~ ` Y
' • n. a1•rt k w a + r. -NOW j F
a
a
a ut
M
M
} t/1 t. NAM A. iormw ~.a /O11t01 ,
601L[YIJb IYaJ411a 17111♦, w 11MtM. =mum I~~ ALL
gAY10 7ll~lp.~1 ~
lt. Wes,' M j li 11e no
rlll UPC
f
r• 1~ 11111Y~rpn~N,
6►11y,Am Lnl nLL
r-t m" MEN .naW
~•yf10PMEwT iCP~E~-C - ~OwN~[R
r ~a ftn
Po"
m errwsra qtl r i. tm ~ a
mi nit
I
RISC81YBD SEP o 1 1989
1
i
do
i p
~onr r w rr ~ srr ,
1
1 ~ YMr 1r M >A ilY
-T-
ad 171011 wr Y Mr
I M Sim 7W 1.1' in a nw
>w 61. f~
1111 M. -0
11w~
` • V'1 3
till m U71 i wr.711rwr
1
1\iu
' \ nm.\ •J~ Lw n ~x ull
FIW I~IILIIM WY\I Y 1_LI IZ
lC~..dY l'NYA. 1.1111\b
\ IILIr M1N IMJI1~~IYY~~M YUI\
EVAN 41xgP q YII\II\~ \.uY
BOLL
y.rtY1MM
CAAWI
Gil\\rYr rYru\imtlr
~wl lirw n ris ru\
1 IttM0.a 1r ~ rim" 01
OwNEA runs UAMLV9
wsa 7u'f o1Yw o►rcwau ANIM,
u11. w cm w wm r wm ma
wl
WAOA
"i r~+r rY111~ rlw
1
i
f
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DETAILED PLAN
Z-3A-010
1. Statement of intent of Owner:
To develop property in single-story and tvo story professional office buildings
Z. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development ouidei
The DrObArty lo next Ag
or to axistine I
f
3- Total Number of Acres 1n Proposed Districto
W53 Acres
a. Lance Hass and Total Number of Acres in each Parcel or Tracts
c
a. Single Family Detached Total Proposed Acr a qe
y b. Single Family Attached (townhoveee, cluster, etc.)
j C. Attached Patio/Garden/Eero Lot :ine
d. D'.plex
e. Multi-Family
I
L Office
1.35 acres ~
g• Neighborhood 8etvlce
h. Oeaeral tastail
iCommercial
Light Industrial
j k. tleavy Industrial
1. Other (specify)
4 I
i
I '
0evelopment Standards
Page 2
Off-Site Inforsation - adjacent or eutrounding land usef, roving, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots,
loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, it required.)
Buildings,
a. Approximate location, (Shown on concept of detailed plan.)
be Maximum height,
Two story
cs minima setbacks, (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Blvd. Right-of-way
+ d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) tog nonresidential,
r Lot t - 'Iwo Stor - 3300 SF
Lot 2 - One Story - 3000 SP
g
Lot 3 - One Story - 2560 SP
1. Residential Subdivislont NA
a. Number of Uits per acre (density),
be MuMbes and location of lots, (Shown On concept or detailed plan,)'
i
c. Minimum alseo width and depth of lotat (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
d. Minimum fronts side and tear yard setbaekst (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
i
Development Standards
Page 3
9. Water and 0cainage - apProsimats location of all ssisting or proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or major drainage facilities
and improvements. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
Curb to be provided on East side of parking lot per Engineering Dept, recommendation
10. Utilities - location of all major sewer, water or electrical lines aal facilities.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
11. Location of trees 3' in diameter - six (b) feet from gcoand level.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
12, open space - location and size of greenbelta, packs, common and recreational areas.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
13, Screening - location, type and site of all fences, becu .3c screening featuc a,
IShown on concept or detailed plan,)
E
F
11. Development Schedule (concept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will
be submitted, data to start construction and complete construction# and rate of
1
development. All dates should indicate month and year.
i _
I
h
C
I
ADDMIOMAL SSQUIRIMPra /OA A DSYASL1a FLAN
19, Landscaping Plan - Mayor features and types of landscaping to be used.
See landscape plan
l
I
Development btanae.as
Page 1
It. Signs - show location, type and mite on detailed plan] otherwise, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the toning ordinance.
Wall Signs (No detached signs)
17. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.)
If, All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A _
(Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances,
(A separate plat is required.)
19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rats of development. All dates should indicate month
and year.
Start Date - July 1, 1989
Complete Date - January 1. 1990
s
i
t
I
t
r
1
t
ae
7/L7
. i
I
i
I '
4
2513L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REPEALING THE SITE
PLAN AND CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO THE 0.426 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN
THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO.
86-61 (PD-108); PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM TWO-FAMILY "2-F" TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION FOR 0.927 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
CARROLL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN PRAIRIE AND HIGHLAND STREETS, AS MORE
PARTICULARLY PFSCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING THAT SUCH LAND SHALL
BE A PART OF PD-108; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A NEW DETAILED
PLAN FOR THE 1.353 ACRES OF LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE DISTRICT;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 86-61, the City Council approved a
planned development district and site plan for the 0.426 acres of
land, as described therein (PD-108); and
WHEREAS Dale Irwin has applied for approval of a change from
two-family t'2 -F" to planned development zoning district classifi-
catidn and use designation for 0.927 acres of land located on the
east side of Carroll Boulevard, between Prairie and Highland
Streets, as more particularly described herein, said land to be
included within and become a part of PD-108; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting the approval of a new
detailed plan for the entire 1.353 acres to be included in the
district; and
WHEREAS, on September 28, 19889 the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval of the change in zoning and the
approval of a new detailed plan for the expanded district; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That Section II of Ordinance No. 86-61 (PD-108),
prov ng or approval of a site plan and imposing conditions
applicable to the planned development district therein created,
is repealed.
SECTION 11. That the zoning district classification and use
designation o the 0.927 acres of real property described as
Tract I in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference is hereby changed from two-family "24" to planned
development r'PD" zoning district classification and use designa-
tion under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of
L - -
s
Denton, Texas, and such land shall hereafter be inwluded in and
be a part of the lanned development district established by
Ordinance No. 86-61 {pPD-108).
SECTION III. That in accordance with article II of Appendix
as Exhibito~~9~~e Code of Ordinances, the detailed plan described
reference, is hereint approved forothenentireolP353t acre eCOf nland
included in the district, described as Tracts I and II in Exhibit
A , so that the property shall be developed, used, and main-
tained in accordance with such plan and the following conditions:
1. The district shall be limited to professional and
administrative office uses.
2. No ground, roof, portable, or projecting signs shall
be permitted in the district, as those signs are
defined by Appendix H-Zoning of the Code of Ordin-
ancea. All stake and wall signs erected or main-
; tained in the district shall comply with the
regulations applicable to such signs as now or
hereafter provided for in Appendix H-Zoning, as
amended.
3, Prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy
for any building on the property, evergreen shrubs,
sufficient in number and location to provide a solid
screen, shall be planted along the entire eastern
boundary of the property, or, if there is not
~ sufficient area on the property to provide for the
living screen, a six foot high solid wood or masonry
fence shall be constructed along the entire eastern
boundary, in lieu of the living screen. The plans
for the required screening shall be submitted with
the building plans submitted for a building permit in
accordance with the Benton Landscaping Code.
4. The 24-inch diameter pecan tree shown in Phase II of
the detailed plan must be maintained with a permeable
area under the dripline of the tree in accordance
with the requirements of the Denton Landscape Code.
Adjacent parking spaces shown on the detailed plan
may be deleted iE necessary to meet this requirement.
SECTION IV. That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton,
Texas, a opts the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to
Ordinance No. 69a l~,a ase8amendedhe is ifurther amended tox show uauch
change in the zoning district clsaeification and use designation
for the property described in Section II of this ordinance.
PAGE 2
I'
SECTION V. That it shall be unlawful for any person to
construct or place any building or structure upon, or otherwise
develops, maintain, or make use of, the property within the
district described herein in violation of the detailed plan or
any condition or provision of this ordinance. That any person
violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction,
be fined a sum not exceeding $2000.00. Each day that a provision
of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and
distinct offense.
SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this
ordinance to be published twice In the Denton Record-Chronicle,
the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten
(10) days of the date of its pasabSe.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988.
I!
FLAY STEPHENS9 MAYOR
ATTEST:
~ I
C JENNIFER WATERS, CITY-MWAY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
I`
LAI,
~I
PAGE 3
I
i
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
11 F!H"-H Loll milli
i
ncEx=
TTT=
IDEIMU i
a -1 A[ J-1 I
C[
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOR14AT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Earl Jackson, Jr.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Tax Technician has determined that a tax refund should be issued.
SUMMARY:
Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of
the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00.
Taxpayer Earl Jackson, Jr, has requested a refund in the amount of
541 O17 U(JDsince duplicate tax payments were made on account # 8907-00331.
$
BACKU
ar ackson, Jr, made payment on November 2, 1987 in the amount of
$ 541.17. On December 28, 1988 his mortgage company made payment in the
amount of $ 541.17. Tax records indicate payments of $ 1,082.34 against
a tax base of $ 541.17. A tax refund is due.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Tax Department and the tax account of Earl Jackson, Jr.
i
FISCAL IMPACT:
$ 541.17
1
RESP FULLY Syg1gITT
arre
City Manager
i
Prepared by:
Name Vic Schneider !
Title Tax Technician
Approved:
a
i
ame Monte Mercer
Title
Controller
Z633C /3
Vale", F-
SUN Pro"rty Tax Ward APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
Refund Appaeaeut 31.11(1/12)
Collecting Office No i ^ a d
Collecting Tax For: 56 far -
( sx ng mta)
Address '
City, State, Zip Code
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the taxpayer.
IDENTIFICATION 0 PR PERTY OWNER:
Name: E12 n el '0~ -co" Jr.
Address: . G 7 cc
Telephone Number (if addibo at information is needed):
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY:
Description of Property. SJ rrY„ e r wir9 d, '44/ilp PAA !c c r~A3,16 e,k ILL p711 J9 Address or Location of Property:
Account Number of Property: X07 / or Tax Receipt Number.
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES:
Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of
From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund
is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested
1. 19---- 19 ~Z $ / S s-5~/ i 7
2, MY- o e^ ?,f 19 19 .~L s-~ $
3. 19 ; 19- S $
Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): ices yir1 eA >`s. 7a/air
f
PyV faxy~s oA //-a 87 and Ass 610r4lap- Co QU f~ee-r ort
"I hereby apply for the refund of the abov*described taxes and certify that the information I Have given on this form j
is true and Corr L"
Signs ure Date of Application for Tax Refund
DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval
Signature of Authorized Officer Date
Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Date
Unit(s) for refund applications over S500
Any person who makes a false entry upon the foregoing record shall be sub)ee1 to ena of the following Penalties; 1. imprlwmment of
not more then 10 years not tws than 2 yaan and/a a Ins of not awe than 31,000 a bops such Ina and
ImprisonmoMp 2. conflnenwi In }aN lora term up le 1 y or of @ One not to exceed 32,000 a bode such One end Ienosom nent sese
forth in Section 27.10, Penal Code.
etruw tut
(
t
YOUR TAXES ARE OUC OCTOBER City ofDaatm Tax Department
TAX STATEMENT FEBRUAND ARY E'OMSEEE REVERSE 115 E. Mainney St.
I SIDE FOR PENALTY AND INTER. Denton, Texas 6201
EST DETAILS. PHONE 5668318
PROPI RTV OESC RIP TION
SUMMERWIND PHASE Ir BLOCK 1, L ACCOUNT NUMBER TAX YR. TE4
DT 9 8907-00331 1987 .592
LOCATION ASSESSED EXEMPT TAXAELI VALUE
2019 A M COURT 919291 91.291
SURVEYOR MKT. APPRAISED WE
541.17
91929
RATIO 4P L
10 dl- k'/ -1k •00
0 L
541.17
130925
cj
CAI
EARL JR JACKSON ,1
2019 LONGMEADOW CT LSI~'N~
I
E DENTON 7X76201
1
1E1
i FOR RETURN RECEIPT, SEND BOTH STATEMENT PARTS WITH SELF-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE
C j
1 j
7
I i
p
~ E
j
~ I
I
f
i
E
r
i
c
j`.
;i
ONTECITO J I/V V r'
ri
690700273 l967 THRUI 6901.00332 l967
DATE 2129/88 TAX TRIAL BALANCE REAL IT 12
90101
ACCOUNT M YEAR NAME NET TAX CODE A PD-DATE TAX PAID PEN PA[D9 TAA PENALTY E(CCtIIVE IEXXT~h<~ ACCOIM
~~qq~pp DATE
KR M ~
69070027 67 MONTECITO J/Y 125 6S YNMRNN 1129 t S.65-
T
EC[TO Jlv 11 .13 YMliN!! f/29 1 5 1
1. -
'011f
i T81Q 22.75 yy*##" l z5 1
7 7 MONTECITO JrV ~i1.7i'"TpgANglq"'17 }1Ti7- ' ____.___i~_____._~a 4p
09070778 7 MTk1TEC1T0 J/Y f26.52 YMNNN 126:5 iC1
907[10279 7 MONTECITO J/V 127,28 YNNMN IY 1/29 127.26-
70g160 7 MONTECITO J/V 124.ot YNNW MN 1/29 124. 1- .00
122.62 YNNVMfN 1/29 122.
00
t;$~--; ~f}}8 ff8----------- - - 1 90100140
1aN =7 - 1 7 :ao
}sag--...,~ I. 90100140
690700281 E1 TEUto J/V -
7~{7p284 67 J/Y 133.11 YMfNNM 1129
MONTECITO 135.11- '
700285 87 MONTECiTO J/V 122033.96 80 Y YNNwom 1129 11J.96- 00 •00
77p0p022e6e16l $7 MWiEESCSIrrTpOp11V
I Y MAW it
J r1N~~N1 2209 QQQ~QQQ+
7E10R99"'0r-WH...___.-----T27:pp3~ "4N ►4q'--}~29...._}~ ' ' , 9Q 0mv
6907001190 89 87 MONTECITO J/V 127.1 YMNfNI 1/ 121•--_.__
b7 MONTECITO J/Y 135.6 YMNNN 1/29 1335.16 p~0 00 90100150
700291 67 MOLPOS T J/Y 114.3 Y)""m 1/29 I R.3p 90100150
7 BOUNDS C C E 915.09 YM O#M 1tl1 915. •OD
aa7 ~t1$aa~fa R-----•----•---------
M. - }f } -----8 MONTECiTO J i9 ii 50
890 ¢7 MONTEC[TO JIV
7 /V Sp
9w0 e87 MO►REC1T0 J/V I Wort" I/ t 00, 67 110NTEC1T0 J/Y 125:26 YNM~ 1/%2209 12 50
5.26-
M18 . 901pp1
7 001
•
ego7pp3~} er MONtEC1T0 IV }25■ ...}719- Ea~v...... . 901
~p1 67 MOTFrITo JIV 199'70 YW#wm 1%229 199:126-
690~700Q0370052 !6 MONTEC[TO'J/Y ~ ~0 90100150'
pp7~t1Q0j7(()~$4 ae7 yMOO~NTTEE(CItTO JIyV 118.93 YMNMNI 1129 ,'e 9 ~+w~+
9010015,E
9o1ao1sfi
~96rUV306--E~--AONTEC2T8-ff9---• 99. YMHNN qq; • .
700707 7 MONTECITO J/V
124.2
- 90T~S545
700708 7 C[TO J/V 1 95 YMNNN 1
700~pq 7 CNAI+NISISIIANSEM KEN Qp
t7p0p0~3 7 (OUTS( TOM RQALTOR INC Sri :19 Y*"*" 1/2 3,5 ~1.19- 901001
70034- 1°4~1~P"it' I~ iI~NI~fil9IE4T!!k_-.--- 605,4=0p79~ TYrY+++aiq 1///222~19q 3jj pppp2255~~~ e
13 7 -P - PROPERTIES, INC DDB • 1t~9S2;"1R99Yq "}~IO -"1;944:_.__._, .....ta to 001
.._.am: - 491
89~07Cg34
R -P 602
PROPERTIES, INC 7 4 YN7YMN! 7: 90: 901001~~y4
90316 7 R-p PRPROPE OPERTIES" Inc 78:47 YNNYWM F.06 x.47 ?.04 66.53 901001
65
_ q q 7Y. YlNYM1f~
- -
3I9 -}w-------------- ' qp
89070D 7 R-P PROPERTIES, INC 4 40}0015
3~Q 7 A-0 PROPERTIES, INC PA YYMM,rM~ N,
90170033117 7 R-P PROPERTIES, INC 76. YNYTNVMI 3 6:9 001
63
a6~9p077p0p0~32232 7 R -p PROPERT(IEESS. INN~C 77y7. MYyM~IY41a MfN 2~. 6.9)
990700321- j R P A}IFS "IAC----....•........ YIW
d7•
.001607
890700325 7 R-P PROPERTIES, INC ' ---•__.a 90r
89077QpQQU 67 R-P PROPERTIES, INC 7 YMIYMfH 6 DS -1, i
890/U0327 61 A-P PROPERTIES, INC 7~• TM7Yi4VM1 1 S66
890700 6 7 R-P PROPERTIES INC 71, YNNYNMN 2• 4
YNIYMNI 84. 7 91 9U1 C
7 JACKSON, ARL R 4
a 491
4 . Y
N ! / 417• 54 7 901Q72015
690700333 1961 THAUS 890?00 92 1967•
64rr 7/791 RA uX iRIAI P4! WE orA. 1 2 9 0 1 0 0
PXGE a r7lrrrh!r urrt •r ~urul =
lilt! I
i
I
1
i
1
1
I
t
•
I I,
r
i`
i
j
f
i
i
I 1 1-1 IF
-1 1
I
h
i
I
.L
l /QJ
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Gary L. Juren
RECOMMENDATION:
The Tax Technician has determined that a tax refund should be issued.
SUMMARY:
Chapter 31,11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of
the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00,
Taxpayer Gary L. Juren has requested a refund in the amount of $ 1,148.83
since duplicate, tax payments were made on account # 8906-00194.
BACKGROUND:
Gary L. Juren made payment on November 7, 1986 in the amount of
$ 1,148.83. On November 10, 1986 he made another payment in the amount
of $ 1,148.8$$3. Tax grecorAds indicate payments of $ 2,297.66 against a
PROGRAMS,oDEPARNEN'd'S36R WHSrft~F~9CTE ;due.
The Tax Department and the tax account of Gary L. Juren.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$ 1,148.83
• ' RESP F1LL
(;rTTE :
to arre i
City Manager
Prepared by:
/ ..GcC'46 I
"ama Vic Schneider
Title Tax Technician
Approved:
ame Monte Mercer
Title
controller
1633C /3
i
h
state Free" Tom eoard APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
rtotuod Appiketfon 21.11(4112)
Collecting Office Name. Tor r s 14
i
Collecting Tax For: elf
L rT (ax ng nits)
~Z~E • ~14ck'iir~t*~i !)P.t fo rr 7X
Address
City, State. Zip Code
In order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer.
IDENTIFICATION OF PROP;RTY OWNER:
Name: L ~/r ~e nC v 7~
Address:
Telephone Number (if additional Information needed):
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY:
Description of Property: 07~ Deri Re. old / L/s
Address or Location of Property c e
Account Number of Property. or Tax Receipt Number:
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES:
Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of
From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund
Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested
lf3
1. L J f r 19 _ //-/D 19 S y~ $ / IM
2' 19 _
3. t9 S $
I Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): Ajpll~dlc oa ✓rm eti is ✓
-~'ayiyPr on l/' 7-~6 >y /O ~G
°I hereby apply for the refunJ of the above-described taxes and certify that the Information I have given on this form
fa tr a and correct"
Oa,,` 1 SS i
Signatur Date of Application for Tax Refund
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval
Signature of Authorized Officer Date
Signature of Presiding Officer(a) of Taxing Date
Unigs) for refund applications over $500
Any person who ""a false entry upon the foregoing record sholl be sub)ecl to one althe laMowlnO Wale": f. Imprleanmenlol
not more than 10 years nor less than 2 years and/or a fine of nos talon than !/,000 or both such line and
ImprianmanN, 2. conflnamenl In lap fa a lorm up to 1 year or a fine not to secaed $2,000 or both such fine and impAaomwl sow
forth In Section 37.10, Panel Code.
PINNe 31 11
a
.s
i
. . 358
i THE MAINNEY 6UILDINCI ACCOUNT
=tf E. KINN;Y. &VIT6 aW PH. $11.6 010
QENTQy, iWo T92Ql -
PAY
TO THE Li L) J
oipiR LAW
filo 7-
_ - - - - - -9bLlAR9
~JV
Mft- *bow
CPS"a . OMT
0000 b k"a V
W'OOD358d yli i i i9p 2 itigN M X46 i06gK~
C
R
}
t
i
i
1
1
S
.
' ~1 S1o 1~I ~Z 171 / ~ W IG
ruwwru ~~M~ rY■
i4 {16V1~ w~.~r~ w
` KIrN
1 Vf i N p
fm
' { : 1A :V 4;r .:i V A ~r"~' .fir
S
1
{
f
I
I
I
'r
I 1
3
r
f
I
•rM1,Mrr,rY YYY \ M r• rrMMVMM
•~a ~3viii~ ~6 cNEC,u~AtE ecv c~RP ~d:11 rNw.ww 3'rii ~d:ii- i:v~- ~S . , ,
MONTH
N DATE 212ve? TRA TRIAL BALANCE REAL PAGE 121 PENALTY EFECTEVE NT
OUE
{ ACCOIMT N YEAR NAME NET TAM CODE A P6-OATI TAR PAID PIN PAID TAM DUE PEN DUE TOOT TAL DUE
.QQ
`gp~ppll EYING, MfLVIN R 13.95 T NNNMINA 10151 26S.I5
`9060011+ EYING, MELV~N A 1 /1 1 '9S- a tla .,....tJa~-
101 + [Eyy
{T4 RIG !C E t-E ft:;S ; Op
p{~~~g h /
P i1:5! 'vNNNNM`MM t l1} 11.5 S: 1- •OQO
490600110 CMMEECKKA7E DIV CORRP
+19060 IR I6 SCHERT2 CORP 11.01 rNNNNNNB 1 I 1 11 .Q t-
IS LOMS RICHARD A 510.29 TNNNHMm 12/ 1 -
19p0p~6p0p011y5
'90600}IS 0~.~1 tQEY 7~:f . .......aQQ.....- -
e90600t wACHAL a INC
11.91 YNIeeNN1l 121131 11.~ -
1
/90600186 16 SCHERTI CORP 10.19 YNNNNNIM 12171 31.
690600111 1166 lCHERii CORP . 9 YNw~YMW 12/S1 600111 WINDSOR PARK DEV ,...,.....a
qp~pp IxoYICY 9 a in=- 1 $ s......~:
'4bb0p}&- S.2S-
HEC~
1 19.1 CHECKINIE DIV COOP 1
14, 9 YWOO MI III 11. -
/90600192 CHNCKIMTE DEY CORY
JUREN, AY / • '
KILL# CLAM[ 9.
E T CS /.7 .Y
1 196 will T ! vwffo e1 I I
`90600I% PAL►~NT, LESLIE H ,
+9060019/ WINDSOR PA DEV 2.11 TMo"" 1 / •~1• .00
/90600199 yYyS1~N~QQDSSsOQQSee PAW
aa~~(( QDQE((V
"1lCN6i0A PJ[IDi 6EO• ~ ] a .
190600202 16 YINDSOA PAID DEV
4NN
207 b WINDSOR PARK DEV 6051.6] YNNN1"m 1122! 1 4 1.6 Z .00
!!90600
r9p ~2p4 16 WINDSOR PARK DEV .4{ 6Q 201 WINDSOR PARK DEY •s T 2 DV:1
...................~3.{..~..f . . . ~ _
/90600201 ed 1'INDSCR PAW DEV - 16:9 YNMNNNN 1 1 11 16:9
190600X9 I6 WINDSOR PARK DIV 19'72 Ye 1 i ) 1 9 1./ - 175.1 -
90600210 16 INJING VIEW PARTNERS T1N6M'Im ,
.00
9060G:11 /6 ADAMI JOHN S e,410.4 YINie6YN 11) 6,4 .1 -
1 16 1 ......................o-}}:1~ }..~Itm.....~ a .
/90600214 M 1 B METAL PRODUCTS CO 65 4.34 Y NNlNeNA 2/ 1,41:1 1,111.1 1,41F.81
690600214 M 6 e METAL PRODUCTS CO y J 6 b++ yy
19060021f PUTNAM LNAALES Y JR 6,011.11 YM 1111 6,01
190600216 FIRST Ass, LY OF GOD _ _ lAf2~ 42-
¢gp~(~Q jj .t a t►s• .s
90600219 J: a ..a t:
. .l#s
1 J6.
E 2}I- E 06 YNNNNNNN 1 / 91, 1:
OR No JOE OE D
NT OR 99.
9060022 ~~66 NTH TEKA! 1 1 L ASSOC 91.61 Vw#oNN -
S ! ` ASSOC 93. YNM6M1N11 1 I 9 1
2 10 NORTH TEXA L
1 2 bb NOATM T[KAS ! ` L ASSOC 91.4 TMNNNNNN I C
2 s • NOATN fEXA) S L ASSOC rNNMN111111
1
/
Y1e t ,
rNNNN
! L ASSOC • '
- 91.1
2~6 NORTH TIXA!
NORTH TEXAS S L ASSOC 14 YNN100"4 I .1
22 -~.1-
tE1 NORTH TEXAS ! H ASSOC 1.4 YNHYIMIN
.
ty...... .
v.. aRTw 1101 U -t-1110 ~ •I f V:t .
90600:3}1 NOUN TEXAS S L ASSOC 01.4 YNNNMM91 I 1
19060013! 16 NORTH f1AAS ! l ASSOC 91.4 YWOM111N / 91.4
rwr~+r~
J.,11111111w1w 11 1 1]
i
i
R
{
1
(
1
I
I
I
j
1
i
S
i
WIN
! 0923L
I
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING
` FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
if EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the construction of public works or
improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and
City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
received and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals
and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the
construction ~ public works or improvements, as described in the
"Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications
attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the
lowest responsible bids:
BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
I
9904 _ JAOOF. PUBLIC C(7l4SPAN1f S 181749.00
PR0104533 PdrP OONSTRUCTION OOWANY $ 9,943.00
i
f
i
SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above
compet tive i s shall not constitute a contract between the
City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such
i
N
I
public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until
such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the
Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written
contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after
notification of the award of the bid.
SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute aTt necessary written contracts for the performance of
the construction of the public works or improvements in
accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided
that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to
Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto
specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications,
standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein.
SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above
competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public
works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council
hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in
the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized
contracts executed pursuant thereto.
' SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme atdT rely upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1987.
r
~ I
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I '
i
ATTEST: 1
i
i
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY 1
srMTM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I
f j APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: {
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCii, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE TWO
i
f
DATEt OCTOBER 18, 1988
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TOr Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTt BID# 9904 COLORADO TURN LANE AT LOOP 288
RECOMI.!ENDATIOH :
We recommend this bid be awarded to Jagoe Public
Ctxnpany for the asphalt at $18,749.00
SUMMApYt
This bid invitation was sent to nineteen prospective
vendors and received only two bids. The project was
bid for either asphalt or concrete. Tide asphalt is the
lowest bid. we are recommending the low bid as the
street is asphalt and the turn lane would be consistent
and compatible to the street.
BACKGROUNDt
Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED3
1
The Bond Fund and the Public
FISCAL IMPACT,
There is no additional impact on the General Fund. 1
t
i Reapect~ily submitted i
City Manager
b e c
re _
e o J. Marshall
Itlet Purchasing Agent
p yedi
N~ e J h . Marshall
/~'itlet.-purchasing Agent
i
N
I
I I I I 1 I i
r SID i 4901 I ! I I I i I
' I I I 1 1
` BID TITLE COLORADO TURN LANE AT LOOP 268 1 I 1 I I I I
f .--.-..--'_--•---•--•-----------I I I i i 1 I
1 OPENED DCIOBFA 8 1988 I SUNMOUNT I JABOE PUBLIC I I I I 1
I I I 1 I I
ACCOUNT 1 IO6.020•BDBT-B11O-9105 I I I I I I I
f 1 I DTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VbDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
r 4.. °•--°°I• -
ITURN LANE-COLORADO I 1 i
' I 1
i I I 1 I 'r 1 I ~ I
` I IA. ASPHALT 1 20.148.00 1 1B,T19.00 1 I I I I }
f ~ t I I I I
I III. CONCRETE 1 20,B53.00 1 210120.00 I I I
I I I I I I I I
g I 1111 BOND I YES i YES I 1 I I I
I
1 1 I I 1 I 1 ~ ~
~ ~ I ~ I 1 1 i I I
~ 1 1 i 1 I i ~ ~ I ~
I I i I I I I I I ~
I ~ I I i 1 ! I I I I ~ ~
1 I I I 1 1
~ ; i I i I I I 1 I E
i I I i l I 1 [
I I ! I i I I
1 I 1 I I I I 1 I
1 I I I 1 1
I I 1 I I I I I
f I I 1 I ~
I I i I I 1 ~ I I ( {
I I I 1 j.
i 1 1 I i I 1 I i I ~ !
` 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I
i 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 I I I I
I 3 I 1
I 1 1 I I I I I I ,
I I I I I 1 I
I ~ ~ 1 I I I I I
I 1 I I I I
i
E
i
1
i
{
IAA'' ' ! 1 211
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
i
DATE: October 10, l966
TO: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Bid No. 9940 - East Bound Turn Lanes at Colorado
Boulevard and Loop 266
We have evaluated the bids for the turn lanes. We included
both concrete and asphalt alternates in the bid packages to
encourage active competition between these two methods. The
low bid on the project was Jagoe Public with $16,749. 'this is
slightly above our construction estimate. However, we had not
included pattern rip-rap which we added at the last minute
prior to the bid award. This will match the median treatment
to be placed across the way by the developer of Denton Auto
Mall, Based on these evaluation of prices and the necessity to
get this project installed as soon as possible, the Engineering
Division recommends that Jagoe Public be awarded the bid for l
the turn lanes.
Please call if you need further information.
Jer" y C ar
0596E
i
ti
r
DATE: OCTOBER 18, 1988
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS PURCHASE ORDER 87114 P&P CONSTRUCTION
RECOMMENDATION:
i We recommend this Purchase Order in the amount of
I $9,943.00 to P&P Construction Company be approved and
I the v,.,,ador be notified to proceed.
SUMMARY:
j This Purchase Order is for the restoration of one of
the rei,t houses near the landfill on Edwards Lane. The
house was damaged by fire. The City of Denton Public
Works Department has been renting these houses since
the landfill property was purchased. The Proposal
includes all labor and materials to complete the
project.
BACKGROUND:
Purchase Order 871141 Proposal from P&P Construction
Company,
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT Opt CROUPS AFFECTED:
Public Works rental property
FISCAL IMPACTt
Funds for this restoration will come from the City of
Denton self insurance funds. The dollar amount is
below our outside insurance company deductible amount.
Respec,tPfkly submitted:
i
Ll o d v.
y Harrel l
City Manaryer
P red
Names Tom D. Shaw
Titles Assistant Purchasing Agent
ove s
r ~l J~
~Met ohn J. Mars
hall
A'itlet Purchasing Agent
I ~
Nt4UtS1 FOR PURCHASE 104555
R Oe CITY OF DENTON DATE: REQUESTu
gefpcnsible Msponei Requested BY Auth r ed !q
Die Venda Cod s n r
"'w~07 o~1t~ x Harlan Jefferson X Una
Requeslor Phone Ina Fund AsancY arvratl Activity Obi Oct job No. r TOTAL No.
Vendor Name $66-8320 No. 807 002 0007 8808 1
NEED aY DEINERYSCNEOULE
Vendor Address MO. DAY YR. MO. DAY YR.
SHIP TO
7 7
I
s
Vendor Contact W~ Shipping S S
t Venda Phone Comments • F.016.
6 ~
BUDGET TOTAL 1.~G
f Venda Catalog No unit cost Total cost Description tni ° id
Jq uanti ty ml ComrtaditY CoAe m
i - Z
1 _ Restoration of home to original living
A
1 condition by replacing only actual burned Dl
G
i areas and cleaning and_paintin the smoke a
- A
_ damaged areas. (See attached proposal)
a
m
Z
t i
c•
CJ ~
I,
I
r
WHITE •Purchaalns CcpY PAGE TOTAL ll~ MUST AGREE WiTN BUDGET TOTAL
! YELLOW •Purehaslns(wlll be returned with P.O.)
ii
PINK • Regaisitiomer's Cepy
i
i
ii
l
f~
Proposal rroposal No. I
• FROM 47 l 5 Sheet Na. I
{1S~'t'uC71un Com,~c.nt~ r
.Pore), .508'11 r Dale q/e2(008
L3en6n ITexQS II&OOU I l) 38ri - ALITj All
(81.1) '1rlgq
((Pr~~o~posal Submitted To Work To Be Performed At
I` Name-cIL~ S1L[J 'ter T'rn nhC11.0 Street L"A t rleA "CIA 44n~se LA Uakii i ll
Street City Up bell ~SlaleTeYfIS
r city- Denim- Dole of Plans Q r•~ps
` Slate_ 7
fl Telephone Number - ° ^f raa~~' P1+1`71COn5{ t c,c-h~n Ccr
We her: - ropose to furnish an the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of
'Livipt, t'
as olnvs ON1,540 rr n, l r, m it rcf, - -
I
l
An material is guoronteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings
and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a svbdonlfof workmanlike manner for tiles sum of
Nine 41icusatxS,1461t? Hwidt-td tkLL lree c~ NO/100! ,-+A -,,DollanlS4,9'43.00 1.
with poyments to be made a$ fonowsr l
Wee.klu orl.~~)t.S~lac~~.s~in4~1s1ed lwipbt~+
Any alleralfon or deviation from above specifications involving extra coils, will be executed only upon wrillen orders, and will
become on extra charge over and all the estimate. All agreemenh contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our
e control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary Insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensollon and Pubnc
Liability Insurance on above work to be laken out by (b P, t 9
Respectfully submittedZ4La e--A, ~A1aW
Per
Not*This proposal may be wlthdrown by us if not accepted within 30 days
t
l ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and ure hereby accepted. You are outhoriud to do the work no
1 t specifed. Payment will be made as oullined obove.
f
w
Accepted Signature
i
Dole Signature
uTNe IN V. e. A.
tOM ►OxM fees
t
I ~
zp 0. Box 50871 & P Commercial -Residential
Roofing 6 Remodeling Speclmsts
Denton, Texas 76206
(617) 387-2489 CONSTRUCTION
(ill)`r5T-4"
vil propoeAtopeircim tMtollawing lo._ f)[fy7E --+hf La
' I I
awned by Mgu loceN~d. Ql r ,r d
___a[UANn .TaM,
-The C.cn~mjc'r It t
Kral ~r}r~'rrplace FronF Der $ Scxeen~~~
Shet+roc)Lrigpe bed 1 Qa;ryf v~oll~4 Ctiti x,,
repbea. C Iwr eouel,;re,-
rron+ 13od~roen, or pe-n.. rPPlce kl, rlt 4)edr0c,3-Lb Pei brci
polnF sher}rc,ck,l~ burn~{(7anTlelir~'►Cu~ino~,
Clean lj%d'lr ow-e
rpPlare nny breke.n ql ass
dA e0m, ppr
l,ivinc,Nreq ecrutsleielySl,Brock4ExttyT}allwallscVdeeilln
r ttvlace CcArP_.E
rWCLc l'ron4 lylin~ouJ•
Ki~~1~en : replace :atl enb;ne s
w' nu'
a~uue i Ouen
Ye TW-i, td
W iodou)
P1Ittr CoUCr,ru\
Ma,n allwa U}ilil~docrs
~.~5'' re~-,late bu~rn~ shee~roe4c,
+apeybea4Palnf W-0SC~,.8
Ceiling
) S;de, En4r~A:re la )earl Plae,r ~oiarinc~i~'gcbtble
P door$ teraen
i etoan Ieol• cruerir,~ i~ posa;ble
rlplaee burncYl Sheefr
I ~Pe'bed otnd ~ain+ 4:ctlls 4Ceill%
11~reE t3edreoh,s : r,gtaae 3o r;loe r!aor one joor
replo'eeore dcor
~I dext car Pei%, v4tn36u]! ~ ~'r'tl'kres
Qain 1 d bofs, wnSl14 C! i 1 i nc~s
t Nall 4 Nosier 'C.c~th elecul €14 CAI( rrs
Clean %cbr cjQ#r,,nrbs I
p i.11m Walla 1 ealllno~t
~a,rSs }4k ie l er ION o~ NMI l 4;de oe txm5r
aarnac~ed
rQOkree aTvusburned W Ire;r9y @let~r a VWgs, or I l a}rl t y~ cares }Fta4 o re
c4ut+o~ir~,
AIp rb0~e Ilemr will W c0mplrtad Iar tar 1 ArI r4m o! {illy i' W` f
r Ia rttM ColleCllod, awne 1
Dwne a9rar 10 Fly rrrbac,e rrta/ wady lm 6p pacenugr wmp Ided bal.II ro~ I ace drab a n saoumt nmamr anraM 10Orye
Ile der at domplel on. ewne agrar to pry tale payment Baca a• d mulmum legal ote 1111 banal rwcerrary
or.. to pay a0 MN of ewllalWn, lmlydby coati cart and eI101M%1 IN4
The I.Il lermr ee e010d I' And ocdaptad bK tOwnerl Dala_-------
- -----'--"-.Y-
1 { 1 CON TBtl0110N
~a
By
i
I~
1
f
1
' R
r
1
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566•8200
DATES October 14, 1988
TO% Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
i
FROMI Harlon L. Jefferson, Risk Manager
{ SUBJECTi FUNDING FOR FIRE DAMAGE RESTORATION
The restoration of the City'a rental property damaged by fire shall be paid
you are below the
for by the Self-Insurance Fund, because the
deductible of our property insurance policy.
funds of the City, such as the Solid Waste Fund, Utility Fund, General Fundo
etc., contribute annually to the Insurance Fund for property, liability,
to coverage,
purThe chase or self insFund ure then the
workers' utilises c the en contributions other
above-mentioned coverages. F
in the case of property insurance, the City insures its buildings and contents i
at a replacement value, and we use a $50,000 deductible per occurrence to
reduce premiums. Our property loss enrage{y ibut, ndicates Ithat ncluding we cold expect to
pay $30,000 annually for property the restoration of
the rental property, the City's property losses for 1987-88 are below $15,000.
s I
If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
l
1 _
rlan L. reon
Risk Mans r
f HLJtajn
3912F
w
I
I
r`
i
i
1
i
3 ~
i ?
6
i
fk
f `
i
i f
e
7nmcLlJZLLL
S
j
1}
f
f
i
DATEe OCTOBER 18, 1988
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TOe Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMe Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTe BID# 9893 WOODROW LANE AND BUR141NO TREE BRIDGE,
PAVING AND UTILITIES
RECOMMENDATIONe
We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder for
the complete project Sunmount Corporation of Roanoke,
Texas in the amount of $1,513,097.49.
SUMMARY i
This bid invitation was sent to sixty-three prospective
general contractors and sub-contractors. Thirty-eight
seta of plans were picked up. We received nine
completed bids. The bid specifications were sent out
to award to one general contractor with either or
asphalt or concrete paving. In this case we are
recommending the low bid of asphalt at $1,513,097.49.
4
BACKGROUNDS
f
Tabulation Sheet and Memo From Jerry Clark
i
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROU!S AFFECTEDe
Street Bond Program, progress on azather north-south
thoroughfare and the Citizens of Denton
FISCAL IMPACTt
r
s There is no additional impact on the General Fund.
Respec lly submittede
Llo V. Harrell
City Manager
Preparecl bye
f la l! ire'-Q,
ame o n J. Marshall
Titlet Purchasing Agent j
~ p x E
'a----
( am 1 Jo n J. Ma rah all
Titl t Purchasing Agent
t
N
I
I
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 78201 /TELEPHONE (817) 668.8307
Office of the City Manapaf
M E M O R A N D U M
V
E TO, Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: October 12, 1986
SUBJECT: Bids on Woodrow Lane and Burning 'free Bridges and
Woodrow Lane
As you can see from the backup from Purchasing, the bids on
Woodrow Lane were very competitive. We did bid the project
with both asphalt (8") and concrete (6 1/211) alternatives. The
difference 111 price is approximately $12,000. Both
alternatives have advantages, and we think either alternative
would be a very good choice. We have recommended the low bid
simply because it is the low bid. We think most of the
1 advantages of one over the other more or less cancels out,
The asphalt alternative has smoother riding characteristics,
does cost less, and we are geared up in our maintenance
operation to do much more of the work in repairing and
rebuilding these streets, Thu concrete alternative has a lot
of data to support less "life cycle" costs, has better
visibility characteristics at night, and is much easier to i
light. We bid Foth projects as comparably designed. We expect i
both to last a minimum of 20 years and would feel very
comfortable with the more expensive bid for concrete if the I
Council is ,to inclined.
We also have a substantial funding problem for this project.
We recognized this early on, You may recall that this is the
third time this project has been rebid. The staff combined the
projects to get more participation and better bids. It appears
that this strategy worked since we had nine bidders and the
five lowest bids were within $50,000. The CIP funding balances
for the projects is listed as follows: j
Woodrow Bridge $187,158
Burning Tree Drainage $ 530904
g Woodrow Paving 4 Drainage $3950939
Burning Tree Bridge $1300706
i
i
Lloyd V. Harrell
October 12, 1988
Page 2
We also have excess funds from the Lillian Miller project of
$81,805 and extra funding from the turn lanes at 1-35 and Loop
288 of $58,972. Also ltotalioft$954b7b4isava4ilablewforhthe
utilities making a grand
project. Since the low bid is $1,513,097.49, we are ,
approximately $558,000 over estimate.
There are a number of reasons for the additional cost. Final
configuration of the road that the Council approved was a five
asts
lane extra versus in h the original four r polane. rtion The median
the W00. There werealso -in the bridge areal that were
the Woodrow project, particularly
not anticipated. Those costs are $49,700. Finally, the
Woodrow bridge estimated cost given to us five enarrs go 101
approximately $2S0,000 which included approximately
engineering cost, The actual bidprice f the bridge the
$365 ' 000. engineering T cost c is t suboverrun tracted i outapproximately $155,000 if
The Burning Tree projects contain some of the same kinds of
cost overruns. In the original estimates, there were We
estimates made for right-of-way, particularly ximatel
are estimating the cost of that property to be appro y
$24,000. Also, the estimate on the bridge was $1S0,000 which
included engineering. That plus the cost of moving the high
pressure gas line are estimated to cost an additional $55,000.
Also, there is some extra paving included with the bridge work
that elevation will of amount bridge approximately orepave
p in order to make the roadway work.
i' These extras total some $430,000 plus. There consider would obviously
be several options for the Council cons which include
not building the projects, scaling the projects way back and
building smaller bridges which would not deliver the level of
service we are after, or looking for alternate funding. As we
t have indicated to you in the last couple of months, we have
received verbal and finally, in the last week or two, formal
indications from the Highway Department that funding for all
the HLgghsay projects will not be needed, This will free up
over $5 million that could be used for other projects, It
would be Staff's recommendation that we take the $55b000
shortfall from the $5 million and apply it to this project.
The 191 Committee will also be making a recommendation to the
Council on this funding Tuesday evening.
to try h and Council them a at your further convenience. we would be
happy you
ha
r
Sc40 -5
Deputy City Manager
4 2 82M/bw
f
h
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8100
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 23, 1968
TO: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Bid on Woodrow Lane Burning Tree Projects
Bids for Woodrow Lane and Burning Tree bridges, paving,
drainage and utility Improvements were received on September
21. There were 9 bids received from contractors throughout the
DPW Metroplex area. The bids all were in the range of I.S
million to 1.8 million. They were closely spaced with four in
the 1.5 - 1.6 million range which shows these prices were
representative and should be utilized, We have also recently
1 noted that private development is picking up which only means
i prices will increase. The low bidder on the project was
Sunmount Construction with an asipbhalt bid of $1,51,097.49.
The project was bid utilizing a 6 1/2" concrete section or a V
asphalt section. We had recently reduced the concrete section
to 6 I11" to encourage more competitive concrete bide. The low
concrete bid was from Bertram Construction with $1,524,615.68. I
She difference is approximately $11,S00. These two bidJers were
tt also the two lowest bids received on the project. We have
reviewed the unit prices from both bids and feel they are
reasonable. The main difference in the two bids is the
approximate $10,000 administrative cost on the Bertram bid.
Sunmount has recently completed work for us including the
Denton Airport and has started the Bolivar and Magnolia job
with an excellent bid on that project, They have an excellent
reputation throughout the area and our experiences with them
have been first class. We feel awarding the project to them
will do nothing but assure it is completed on time with the
best quality work,
Bertram Construction has a history with Denton in that they
built Carroll and bell Avenue. They hrve normally received a
project approximately every 10 years in Denton with all those
being concrete. They have not been awarded any bids lately so
we have no recent history. Apparently they are very succossful
in the DFW area as they have stayed in business at least twenty
years.
I
page 2
Approximately $40,000 - $45,000 of this bid will be funded
through the Utility Department for utility relocation upon the
Burning Tree projects. The itemized breakdowns for these
for the $400,000
projects include approximately t'*.110,000 for
for the Woodrow Lane Bridge, r-=•.
Bridge, $60,000 for the paving and drainage improvements, and
$40,000 for the utility improvements. These bids are within
the ranges as outlined. one of the major reasons for increased
cost on this project is that the project was originally
estimated in 1983 according to standards set up at that time.
The project estimate at that time was $550,000 which was for a
6" pavement four lane undivided road.
As you are aware, Council recommended that this be a five lane
developments
relationeto provide an pianR,e as recent
Denton Development plan,
etc have made the Colorado/Woodrow/Nottingham connection a
major one in tl-, City of Denton. Therefore, without proper
design of the road we will basically lose our investment as
heavy traffic will shorten the life of this pavement
significantly. 'rherefore, wa feel the concepts and the needs
since they were
sometime drastically
of the r placed ona the ClP changed
in c 1964,
originally
We strongly feel that with 9 bidders grouped so closely, the
unit prices are representative and can only go up. Sunmount
was low overall based on equivalent sections so they should be
given the award. We did reduce the concrete section to 6 1/2 to
encourage competitiveness with an 8" asphalt versus our
! previous 7" requirement. This is a reasonable comparison which
should have placed the bids on equal terms. however, most of
I the low bids on the project were concrete. If the Council
deems Bertram that the awarded concrete ts$11,then
000
' is a minimal difference in a $1.5 Million project. Since that
sort of decision is a value judgment and we use both types of
streets, the Council should be the deciding body.
Please advise if you need further information.
i
er y a c !
0593h
i
4
(
i
I DID 1 9893 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1
I I I 1 I I
BID TITLE NOODRON LANE I BURNING TREE I I 1 I I I I 1 f
I I I 1 I I I 1 f
OPENED -...SEPTEMBER 111 1900 1 SUNNOUNT I ED BELL ISLENN THURMAN I ATNINS 1 D.L. LENNON I H.B. IACHRY I O.L. BERTRAM I UVALDE
I H.L. LACEY
-••---•••-ICORPORATION I CONSTRUCTION I INC. I BROTHERS I INC. I I I CONSTRUCTION I
ACCOUNT 1 + I I I
I I I
I.............. I..........__..
i I I ..............I........._....I.._.........__I..............I.............. I- 1
I 1 I 1 ..L...........,
..•1 I ITY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I YE400A I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR
I VENDOR
1 ....._..1 ................................Il........•-•...I.............. 1
I IfA ASPHALT I _'_•_•__•••__•_,1_ 1 1
11,513,091.44 I NC BID 11,685,021.20 11,812,546.16 11,651,511.90 11,5359981.00 1 NO BID I NO 119 1 40 BID
I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1
I III CONCRETE 1 NO BID 11,104,122.94 11,615,642.10 1 NO 110 11,623,514.30 11,531,014.29 11,5241615.68 11,616,396.11 11,5601181.02
I I I I I
I IBID BOND I YES I YE1 I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES
I I f 444
I I 1 1 1 + 1 I I I I
I I I I ; 1 1 1 I T I i
B ~ I I I I I I I I , 1 ~
I I 1 J 1 1 1 I I 1 1 +
I I 1 I I I I
1 I I , ~ 1 + 1 I f I
I I I 1 + I I I
I I 1 i 1 I I I 1 I 1
I I I I 1 + + f 1 ~ .
I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 ~ k
1 I t
I
~ 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 + I '
I I 1 I I 1 + + I I I
I I f 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 ff
I 1
1 1 I I 1 ~ I I I ~ ii,
I I I I I 1 1 1 1 ' 1
I
1
+
s
s
f
I
{
i
I .
`I
I 0923L
' NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the construction of public works or
improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and
I City ordinances; and
WHEIEAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
received and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or improvements described in the bid Invitation, bid proposals
and plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE,
` THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS;
w SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the
construction of public works or improvements, as described in the
i i "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications
attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the
lowest responsible bids:
BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
9893 SLNA*VT COIP(MTICN ,S1,313,097.gQ
- I
i
S'dCTION II, That the acceptance and approval of the above
compel t~i3s shall not constitute a contract between the
City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such
{
I
i
M
f~
I
1
public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until
such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the
Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written
contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after
notification of the award of the bid.
executeTIaN 111. hat the
writtenyconManager tracts is hereby yperformance of
N -
the construction of the public works or improvements in
accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided
that such contracts ire made in accordance with the Notice to
Bidders and Bid Proposals and documents relating thereto
specifying the terms, conJitions, plans and specifications,
standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein.
SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above
compet t ve s and the execution of contracts for the public
works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council
hereby authorizos the expenditure of funds in the manner and in
the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized
contracts executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
imZed'iateT upon its passage and approval.
i
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
$ , 1981.
I
R
RAY S
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
~h
ATTEST. {
i
I
ETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
~ E
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM.
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.
PAGE TWO
I
I
'I
i
k
i
1
2493L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING SPEED ZONES FOR NORT':
AND SOUTH BOUND TRAFFIC ON SHERMAN DRIVE FROM ITS INTERSECTION
WITH BELL AVENUE TO THE. NORTH CITY LIMITS; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00);
'ROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. Based upon an engineering and traffic investigA-
tion-TeretoTore made as authorized by the provisions of Section
169 Article 6701d, V.T.C.S., the following prima facie speed
limits for Sherman Drive are hereby determined and declared to be
prima facie reasonable and safe, and such speed limits are hereby
fixed for vehicles traveling upon the following named streets, or
parts thereof:
Location Extent Speed Limit
i
A. On Sherman From its intersection with Bell 30 MPH
Drive Avenue to its intersection with
Lynwood Drive.
B. On Sherman From its intersection with Lynwood 35 MPH
Drive Drive to its intersection with
Buckingham Drive.
C. On Sherman From its intersection with bucking- 45 MPH
Drive ham Drive to a point 500 feet north-
west of Loop 288 east fronttge road.
I
L. On Sherman From a point 500 feet northwest of 55MPH
Drive Loop 288 east frontage road to the
northern city limits.
SECTION II. Based upon an engineering and traffic investiga-
tion eretofor e made as authorized by the provisions of Section
1691 Article 6701d, V.T.C.S., the prima facie speed limits for
Sherman Drive as set forth above in Section I are hereby deter-
mined to be prima facie reasonable And safe, and such speed
limits Are hereby fixed for vehicles travelling upon such street.
SECTION III. That if any section, subsection, paragraph,
sentence, phrase or word in this ordinance or application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court
-T ~
I
the
of competent jurisdiction, aolofn[his gordin nceaffect the
hereb declares it
validity of the remaining portions
such
Cityd C have Len ctede such remaining portions deaplte any
invalidity.
passage, nand the cCity
frtom this dateordinance itsshall
SECTION IV. That
.ec
fourt caption of cl s
een ays
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the
ordinance to be published twice in of°Denton,n Texasra.within ten
the official newspaper of the City
(10) days of the date of its p 1986.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
ATTEST.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM'
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY.
i
4
i
77
i
I
1
CTSSC SfemO
July 27, 19bb
page 2
SPEED
ITEM 93 FORMULATION OF AN SLLFY POLICY FOR THE C
Staff has received many c aints from several
,
citizens in different Presently, the regarding
excessive speeds on a s' in an effort to formulate City has
no speed policy on eys.
whataotherle ea cities tdo f The r esultsm aice preselnted
in the ached memo from Jerry Clark, City Engineer.
ff recommends approval for an ordinance for a
to maximum effect be posted when citizens request them.
ITEM 04 AMENDMENT OF SHERMAN DRIVE SPEED ORDINANCE:
The current speed ordinance on Sherman Drive provides
for 30 m.p.h. speed limit from Bell Avenue to Brown
Street; 35 m.p.h. from Brown to Yorkshire Street; and
55 m.p.h, from Yorkshire to the City limits. This
abrupt change from 35 m.p.h. to 55 m.p.
conform with standard practice. The State Department
of Highways and Public Transportation recommends 5
m.p.h. Increase or decrease between adjacent speed
zones. A maximum of up to 10 m.p.h. jump can be
1 excused if it can be justified by existing data.
1 This situation has resulted in several citizens
calling and complaining about the abrupt change.
Also, the current ordinance (No. 75-49) provides forr
an 500 ft., 20 m.p.h. school zone, and a 700 ft.,
Wind!or
m.p.h. school zone
These at
j respectively.
longer necessary since the re-zoning of the school
district IP. 19b7. Staff has checked with the
principal of Strickland Junior High and he estimates
that between 25 and 50 students bike or walk to
school from the other side of Sherman through Windsor
Prive. An actual count by the staff on a school day
between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m. reported 11 total of
of
pedestrians and bikers. Apparently,
those students in the estimate are driven to and from
school by their parents or relatives. Moreover, the
signal currently being installed at the intersection
of Sherman and Windsor will provide measure of safety at the intersection.
Staff also feels it is necessary to extend 30 m.p.h.
from Bell Avenue past the curve at Piggly Wiggly
instead of the 35 m.p.h. around that curve at the
for r speed a as follows: that Sherman
Drive present, be zoned Therefore,
30 3S m.p.h. from Greenwood utotBuckingham',
'CTSSC Memo
July 27, 196.
page 3
4S m.p.h. from Buckingham to a point 500 ft.
northwest of Loop 266 east frontage road; and
SS m.p.h. from thence to the City limits.
ITEM 05 G NERAL BUSINESS:
a) date on driveway variance request at 2312
S negate street:
The Traffic Safety Commission denied this request
at t e June meeting. The request was presented to
the anning and Zoning Commission where it was
'r ante There were other facts underlying the
request that were not presented to the Traffic
Safety ommission. Staff believes that if those
facts we presented to the commission the request
wouldn't ave been denied. The building was
primarily ntended as a convalescent home for a
couple in t eir seventies - the husband has been
diagnosed wi a degenerating terminal illness and
is already in a wheelchair. They have sold their
home to build this to provide more maneuvering
room for spe sally equipped vehicles. The
four-car garage oes not necessarily mean 4 cars
will be parked i the garage. We are providing
this detail so tha the action of the Planning and
i Zoning board be not construed as arrogant
flaunting of authority as have been suggested by
! their similar act ons in the past. Staff
sincerely believes th situation is different this
time.
b) Loop 266 @ Audra safety provement:
Staff will meet with the tate Highway Department {
resident engineer and his fficials first week of 1
August to determine safety provement measures at
this intersection.
c) Update on the request for peed reduction on
Teasley:
Staff met with Lakewood Estate Mobilehome Park
management for further discussio of the issue.
G:±ner, Mr. E.J. Burton said they re comfortable
with existing speed limits but that what they are
requesting is consistent speed zoni on Teasley
Y
for both northbound and southbound tr fic. Staff
does not plan to conduct any further st ies.
d) Attachments:
i
1) Speed zoning on Texas Highways
2) Jam Sessions
These traffic related issues will make intere ting
reading.
0560E
V r
CTSSC Minutes
August 1, 1988
page 3
taff
In an effort to formulate a reasonable policy,
do.
has done some of s~hemh havew aatblother anket aordina t es that
The majority speed
mandates alleys in the city to wouldabeaxes onsIble
of 10 mph or 15 o ph. The City
for signing all dedicated alleys wit n t e city
limits. The City will install w atelver le signs
recommended by the Comnoif s tion hey areriv residents. wThe
be,.the I e3Ror;ibilj$y i for rivate alleys but
speed it wduldsti11 app Y
or maintenance
the inCity takes no stallation of signs nonbthetY for the
% own cam for ad
Mar Mesler at 2216 Geor
addressedsthe Commission. etsaid shee livesaalongna
perivate alley, hed toShe askechif ethetys' peed limit they
noribewacnumber whit istnoit would t divisibletbyxS. 15 mph
b ,
ms, because Messier efence d she 9 cars exiting theirpentrancess etc
Ms. Messier sked if they put the speed signs up,
j would the P ice enforce them.
Captain D tson said it would be enforced if the City
} had an dinance and signs were pasted.
David Graham asked if most of the people were
rest ents or people that pass through.
a M . Messier said there is a combination. Kids on
opeds, residents, etc.
° Vivian Edwards asked if private alleys would be
covered under the IS mph ordinance. Paul said yes.
STAF RECOMMENDED: Approval
C MISSIONERS: John Tompkins made a motion to accept staff
recommendation with the ordinance to read for
1
secondedvthe motion, ubli MotionlpassedDunainimous ly.
f; AMfiNDDNU Oar 151! AN DRIVE SPEED QRDiyAIiCBs
Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said the r
street name in the CTSSC memo on July 27, needed to
be changed to reflect Lynwood street instead of i
Greenwood.
r r
cTSSc Minute;
August 11 1468
page 4
Paul presented a transparency w hiindicated the
exact locations of the proposed speed limits.
30 m.peh. from Bell Avenue to Lynwood;
3S m.p.h. from Lynwood to Buckingham;
4S m.p.h. from Buckingham
northwest of to Loop a ~58o1east 5f0 rontage
road; and _
SS~ak.p.h, fF°4~thencee p.the City limits.
Shrman
Paul said the current speed ordinance to from eBell limi
Drive provides for SO m.p.h. speed m. eh. from Brown to
Avenue to Brown Street; 15 Yorkshire Street; and SS m. . h . fr om Yorkshire ttot the
City limits. This abrupt change from 35 m.p.h.
State. does no a onformofwithHighways d p endtice Public Departmi
Transportation recommends S m.p.h• increase or
A maximum of
decrease between adjacent speed zones.
up to Is m.p.h. jum ican be exThisd situation an has
justified ed by by ex
resulted abrupt change. calling and complaining
about th
Also, the current ordinance (Noe 75-49) Provides for
2U
an b00 ft., 20 m.p.h• school zone, and a 7o0ift.,Row,
m.p.he school zone at Windsor Drive and Kngs
respectively. These re- zoning sofngthe aschool
longer necessary
i district in 1987. Staff has checked with the
i principal of Strickland Junior High and he estimates
that between 25 and SO students bike or walk to
school from the other side of Sherman through Windsor
Drive. An actual count by the staff on a school day total of
between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m, reported lpiajority of
pedestrians and bikers. Apparently,
those students in the estimate are driven to and from
school their parents
being Installed iatstheMintersection
signal c currently g provide additional
of Sherman and Windsor will measure of safety at the intersection.
Staff also feels it is necessary to extend
gg1y m.p.h .
from Bell Wiggly
Avenue past the curve at at the
instead of the 35 m.p.h• around that curve a
present.
Dou
HartleeaField withdadvif 45 mph ance warninglsigns posted. past
Paul Iwuchukwo~:ldaid postedould ask if an advance
warning sign
R
CTSSC Minutes
'August 1, 1988
page 5
STAFF RECOMAIENCATION: Approval
CUMiAISSI0NER5. Gene Gohlke made a motion to zccept staff
recommendation with the addition of extending
advance
Erwand in posting
he
4S mph past Hartlee~o RField
warning Signs,
motion. Motion passed unanimously.
tL -
EM IS GENERAL BUSINESS:
a) ~pda?d oW''~driv 4&Y • valiance request at 2312
Stonegate street:
ul Iwuchukwu said the driveway variance was
ap oved by the Planning and Zoning commission. Fie sat if the Traffic Safety Commission had been
presen ed ache infor
beginni ,
vivian Edw ds said when cases are appealed to
planning 6 Wing a represntative therocommission's
should be pr ent to o r repep
decision on the case.
eed that this would help keep
f Paul Iwuchukwu between both commissions.
communication goin
b) Loop 288 I Audra safe y improvement:
DC artnent
offic.ials first pweek of
Staff will emeet ngineer with then state
August to determine e safe improvement measures at
risident August
this intersection. peed reduction on
c) Update on the request f s
Teasley%
Staff net with Lakewood Est to Mobilehome Par
the Issue,
management sor further discus 06 are comfortable
Owner, Mr. R.J. Button said th f
j with existing speed limits beutd tt t! gaontTeasley
requesting is consis te nt sp
fuither wdi. Staff
for both northbound and soutt _
i does not plan to conduct any
d) Attachments:
1) Sped toning on Texas Highways
2) Jan Sessions
These traffic related issues will make inters ling
reading.
Meeting adjourned at 7%00 pim.
0580£
.
Ift DOW
C "V
s
I 4 P i'L
i
a IRA"
~UWA
Iv"~ a n.
w~
POAL If
~ L
D 1 9
t
11 11-Iji 1 1111
rialMLI
f
T r==
rill"
MrTlr=
i
MCO=
i
I
l kk
f ~ I
i
Ell=
i
t
i
N
2494L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING SPEED ZONES FOR EAST
AND WEST BOUND TRAFFIC ON WILSON STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION
WITH LAKEY STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH BRADSHAW STREET; FOR
NORTH AND SOUTH BOUND TRAFFIC ON LAKEY STREET FROM ITS INTER-
SECTION WITH WILSON STREET AND CONTINUING NORTH FOR A TOTAL
DISTANCE OF 380 FEET; FOR NORTH AND SOUTH BOUND TRAFFIC ON
BRADSHAW STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH WILSON STREET TO ITS
INTERSECTION WITH PRAIRIE STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF A
FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00); PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. Based upon an engineering and traffic investiga-
tion errretofo're made as authorized by the provisions of Section
169, Article 6701d, V.T.C.S., the following prima facie speed
limits for portions of Lakey Street, Bradshaw Street and Wilson
Street are hereby determined and declared to be prima, facie
reasonable and safe, and such speed limits are hereby fixed for
vehicles traveling upon the following named streets, or parts
thereof:
Location Extent Speed Limit
f A. On Lakey From its intersection with Wilson 20 MPH
Street Street to a point 380 feet north
of said intersection.
B. On Wilson From its intersection with Lakey 20 MPH
1 Street Street to its intersection with
Bradshaw Street.
C. Bradshaw From its intersection with Wilson 20 MPH
Street Street to its intersection with
the east edge of Prairie Street.
SECTION II. Based upon an engineering and traffic investiSa-
tion er`~ etofore made as authorized by the provisions of Section
169, Article 6701d, V.T.C.S., the prima facie speed limit of 20
miles per hour for portions of Lakey Street, Wilson Street and
Bradshaw Street, is hereby determined to be prima facie
reasonable and safe, and such speed limits are hereby fixed for
vehicles travelling upon such streets.
i
i
I
I
SECTION III. That if any section, subsection, paragraph,
oentence, c ause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any
court of competent ,jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it
would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such
invalidity.
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall )ecome effective
fourteen 14)-7days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretar e to is be e published twice t in the cause Denton RecordnChronicle,
ordinanc
the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Toixas, within ten
(10) days of the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988.
PAY STEP HENS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFIX , CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
t
BY: I
,
f
i
1
TV ofvENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76701 1 TELEPHONE 1817) $66.8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 27, 1988
TO: Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission
FROM: Paul Iwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer
r'
SUBJECT: Traffic Safety Meeting - August 1, 1988
} ITEM f2 SPEED ZONING OF FRED M_OORE PARK:
E
During one of the recent neighborhood meetings, the
area residents around Fred Moore Park requested that
the park be zoned for speed and also that staff
a incorporate into the zoning process any necessary
measures that would alleviate the problem of
indiscriminate illegal parking that is currently
being practiced around the park area. As a result,
the Fred Moore Park Is zoned as follows:
a) 20 m.p.h. speed limit:
s
1) On Lakey street from the north end of the
bridge (over channel) to its intersection with
Wilson street for a total distance of 360 ft.;
w
2) ,n Wilson street from its intersection with
Lakey street to its intersection with Bradshaw
street for a total distance of 760 ft. 1
3) On Bradshaw street from Its intersection with
Wilson street to its igterse ;ion with the east
section of Ptastfebt'f r a 16tal 'distance
of 640 f t .
b) No Perking:
1) On the north side of Wilson sLsetrf" from its
intersection with Bradshaw to'a point 290 ft. !
west of Bradshaw;
I
2) On the a side of Bradshaw from its
Inter on with Wilson to Its intersection
the east section of Prairie street.
7 8
t
MINUTES
Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission `
August 1, 1988
PRESENT: Doug Chadwick, Mike Amador, John Tompkins, Gene
Gohlke, Bruce Chamberlain, David Graham, John Erwin
and Vivian Edwards
STAFF: Paul lwuchukwu, Traffic Engineer Associate
I Captain Jim Ilotson, Police Department
1 ABSENT: Virginia Gallian
ITEM 01 APPROVAL OF JUNE 61 1988 MINUTES:
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. on
Monday, August 1, 1988 by Vivian Edwards. Doug
Chadwick mad., a motion to approve the minutes as
written, David Graham seconded the motion. Motion
passed unanimously.
ITEM 12 SPEED ZONING OF FRED MOORE PARK:
Paul lwuchukwu presented the request. He said the
residents brought this up during one of the recent
neighborhood meetings with the City Mansger's
office. It is standard practice to zone all schools
and parks for speed to enable she police to enforce
speed infractions within those areas.
The area residents around Fred Moore Park requested
that the park be zoned for speed and also that staff
incorporate into the zoning process any necessary
measures that would alleviate the problem of E
indiscriminate illegal parking that is currently f
being practiced around the park area. In the
evenings, especially during the weekends, one can
hardly pass through the area. The whole place is jam
packed and residential driveways are often blocked.
0 Paul said the residents are prqyosing an ordinance
that will stipulate- VResidenty~al~Parking only!) oh the
south side of Wilson between Lakey and Bradshaw and
they are planning to present it to the commission on
the September meeting. At the present time, there is
no such ordinance in the city of Denton. Any street
right-of-way is a public right-of-way and the public
has a right to park on the city right-of-way except
where an ordinance prohibits such an act.
Vivian Edwards asked Paul to define the changes being
requested. Paul said staff is recommending charging
the zine to the normal standard park zoning of. 20 mph.
i
i
r
CISSC Minutes
I August 1, 1988
page 1
Paul said the other change would be to post no
parking on the north side of Wilson street from its
intersection with Bradshaw to a point 290 ft. west of
Bradshaw, and the cast side of Bradshaw from its
intersection with Wilson to its intersection with the
east section of Prairie Street,
John Tompkins asked if this would make It
inconvenient for the residents? Paul said there is
only one ,oacu.pled lot at ,the southeast corner of
Prairie and Bradshaw. Guests can park on the west
side of Bradshaw. There wil' be no inconvenience to
the residents or park users.
Captain Dotson said the ordinance would help the
Police Department solve the congestion and gathering
in the area. He said this would help move cars
without involving residents. It has been reported,
that after an officer comes on the area, residents
are harassed by those who have gathered there.
Residents are crying out for help.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
COMMISSIONERS: John Erwin made a motion to approve staff
recommendation. Bruce Chamberlain seconded the
motion. Motion passed unanimously.
I
ITEM NS FORMULATION OF AN ALLEY POLICY FOR THE CITY - SPE
ALLEYS:
ORDINANCE R Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He s d this
is another major problem that has occurre over the
past three months. It started /tLaurel an alley
around Azalea and CamelJa Streets Hills
subdivision area. Later several e received
from the residents round BGreen and
Georgetown. They are requesting be put up
in their alleys.
Paul said the major probl is that most of these
alleys are no,t dedicated ~J49- ,tytit it,J;~e pr no ,
responsibility towards these a1ileys h. %s 'of them
are mainly ingress nd egress easements and their
design and constr tion methods do not conform with
city standard Therefore, the maintenance
responsibility of these alleys still rests with the
developer or roperty owners.
Most of he time speed bumps are used to control
speed alleys. The reason why the City does not
use eed bumps is that cities have been sued because
of he problems ensuing from them. Very high damages
h e been awarded.
1
I
pcw.i [2 1 K 117-
r4O"r Tb t;~~-F
}~~cXX+cT XKS~~X\. t
FRECD j
MaoRE 3 ~ Q
PARK ~
I} ~ cy
Y F
~ g
W! LSdN
_I
. 2d ^'ph
760
{
1
i
i
~r
x
i
N
i
}3t
3}}
7 t
t `
~ ~ r I
P
a l
i~
3
i
i
i
f
i
I
OCT - 3 l9t . t
~.j
MEMO 88-072
L4
--~.r/S cl; lrE J
TO: Ms. D. Drayovitch, City Attorney
FROM: J. L. Cook, Jr., Fire Chief
DATE: 30 September, 1988
RE: ORDINANCE FOR CLASSIFIED POSITIONS
Please find attached a copy of an ordinance for establishing the
classified positions within the Fire Department as appeared in
the FY 1988-89 Budget. This ordinance was proposed by your of-
fice to meet Section 143.042 of the Local Government Code. Also,
an ordinance establishing assignment pay for the Maintenance Of-
ficer is included.
The City Secretary states that those ordinances have not been
approved. I over-looked them, thinking they would be a part of
the budget package.
Please prepare resolutions for these ordinances in order that we
might place them on Che agenda.
i I'm sorry to be so late in my request. Thanks for your assis-
tance.
JLC/eo
i
xc: Mr. R. Svehla, Deputy City Manager
Mr. T. Hlinok, Director of Personnel
k
E
{
. j
i
2452L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CLASSIFIED POSITIONS IN THE FIRE DEPART-
MENT OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE NUMBER OF
PERSONS AUTHORIZED FOR EACH CLASSIFIED POSITION; REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Denton Firemen's and Policemen's Civil
Service Commission has recommended that the classifications
contained herein be established for the Fire Department of the
City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, Section 143.0+2, Local Government Code, requires the
City Council to establish such classified positions by ordinance
to include the number of persons authorized for each classified
positions; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
i
SECTION 1. The following positions in the Fire Department of
the Ul-ty-75TWenton are hereby established:
FIRE CHIEF
DIVISION COMMANDER
3 BATTALION CHIEF
CAPTAIN
DRIVER
f FIRE FIGHTER
MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS OFFICER
and all positions shall be classified positions except the Fire
at Comisander who shall
Fire Chiand ef o and Division
a when aevacancytoccurs the
i
that position.
SECTION It. The City Council of the City of Denton shall,
each year nn the ordinance adopting the Budget for the City of
Denton, provide for the number of persons to be employed in each
position. Until otherwise determined by the City Council, there
shall be the following number employed in each position:
a 1 FIRE CHIEF
1 DIVISION COMMANDER
4 BATTALION CHIEFS
15 CAPTAINS
37 DRIVERS
1 29 FIRE FIGHTERS
1 MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS OFFICER
I
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective immediately
upon is passagd and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988.
Y
RAY STEPHENS) MAYOR
ATTEST:
,
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHi CITY ATTORNEY a
BY:
r
5
I
I IA
I
i
4
1
1
]1f~
)fiI
l
T-T-1 13
Y.
j i
A
i
2400L TTY J F' lU'~f'~~ ~6clextz,
C'~yt~a~~~f~.~11 ~ azcd,~Ncc-src~
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT PAY FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
EMPLOYEES IN THE CLASSIFICATION DRIVER WHO ARE ALSO ASSIGNED TO
PERFORM THE DUTIES OF MAINTENANCE/LOGISTICS OFFICER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
is in ode
WHEREAS, Section 143.042 of the Local Government
authorizes a municipality to pay assignment pay which an
amount and is payable under conditions set by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager and Fire Chief having recommended
that the fire department employee in the classification driver
who is assigned to perform the duties of maintenance/ logistics
s officer should receive assignment pay of Three Hundred Seventy-
q one Dollars (637140) per month; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUIICIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
1
i SECTION I. That the Fire Department employee classified
drivere assigned to perform the duties maititenan ent pay logistics officer shall receive as i month in addition to the
j Seventy-one Dollars ($371.OQ) p
regular monthly salary of driver.
SECTION 11. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of J, 1988.
I
RkY STEFHENS;~IAYb~___ ,
i
i
ATTEST: t
i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
i DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
1
BY:
I
N
2400L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT PAY FOR FIRE. DEPARTMENT.
EMPLOYEES THIN E E ~ DUTIES CLASSIFICATION INT NANCE/LOGISSTTICS~SOeFICERNEDAND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 143.042 of the Local Govichm is inode
authorizes a municipality to pay assignment pay ordinwh an
ance; and
amount and is payable under conditions set by
WHEREAS, the City Manager and Fire Chief having recommended ificat that the fire department
perform the emloyee in of cmaint n nce/logistics
Thirty-
who is assigned to p of Three Hundred Thirty-
officer should receive er i month ; NW, THEREFORE,
eight Dollars ($338.00) p
THE COUNCIL Ow THE CITY 0: DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS
erform Department
dutiealof emaintenance/
SECTION a- assigned h to Fire
drivers g of Three Hundred
to istics officer shall receive aesr i month pain addition to the
Thirty-eight Dollars ($338.00) p
j regular monthly salary of driver.
and ordinance approval, shall become effective
! SECTION 11.
upon its h passage this
i
~ 1988.
k PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day of
4
Y
i '
,
3
TEP EN , A R
I
ATTEST:
i
APPROVED AS tO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
I
BY. 4'-.
Bell Id
FT-1 J-1-i
gf
t
r
s
t
i
3
~f
1
E '
f
i
F
r'
~ DATE: 10/18/68
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
Lz-
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTt CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING 20.8309 ACRES LOCATED AT FM 2181 AND
` OLD ALTON ROAD. (A-56)
I
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval on
August 31, 1988.
SUMMARY:
A plat was submitted for development of the Shady Oaks Mobile Home
Park. The property wss previously subdivided which required
submission of the plat. City council directed staff to begin the
annexation at a study session on May 17, 1986. The property also
f include# a tract at the northwest corner of the proposed annexed
area not shown on the plat, but the tract was previously subdivided
from the tract shown on the plat.
S BACKGROUND:
t
The City annexed a 500 foot strip along FM 2181 and the Skyfab
Addition on July 7, 1987 to tie the City limits to the Corinth
city limits.
I PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED3
Planning and Development Department and property owner.
I 'I
FISCAL IMPACT:
City services are available in the area including water. The fiscal
impact at this time is minimal.
P
4ec ly submitted:
i
i i
Prepared bl': re.
er
Cecile Carson
L Urban Planner
{ APP ve
ank Robbins
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
2251A
I
I
Mw~
i
2388L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 20.8309 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
PART OF THE J. DICKSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 342 AND A. CANNON
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 232, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE
SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, a request for annexation for the property described
in Exhibit "A", a copy of which is attached hereto and incorpo-
rated by reference herein, was introduced at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of
the City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the ~ day of r , 1988 in the
Council Chambers for al greeted pereo a to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the _/!-t6 day of 46. 1 L.3T , 1988 in the
Council Chambers for all interested pereo s to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Lhis ordinance has been published in full at least
o:!e time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the tract of land described in said Exhibit
"A" be, $nd [he bxme is hereby annexed to the City of Denton,
Texaa, and the same is made hereby a part of said City and the
land and the present. and future inhabitants thereof shall be
entitled to all the ~:-ights and privileges of other citizens of
said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said
City now in effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the
property situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its
prorate part of the taxis levied by the City,
SECTION II. The property described in Exhibit "A" is hereby
classified as gricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the
official zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is
hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION III. Should any section or part of this ordinance be
held unconst tutional, illegal or invalid, or the application
A-56/PACE ONE
w
f
thereof ineffective or inapplicable as to any territory, such
unconstitutionality, illegality, invalidity or ineffectiveness of
such section or part shall in no wise affect, impair or invalidate
the remaining portion or portions thereof, but as to such remain-
ing portion or portions, the same shall be and remain in full force
and effect; and should this ordinance for any reason be ineffective
as to any part of the area hereby annexed to the City of Denton,
such ineffectiveness of this ordinance as to any such part or parts
of any such area shall not affect the effectiveness of this ordi-
nance as to all of the remainder of such area, and the City Council
hereby declares it to be its purpose to annex to theCity of
Denton every part of the area described in said Exhibit "A" of this
ordinance, regardless of whether any other part of such described
area is hereby effectively annexed to the City. Provided, further,
y that if there is included within the general description of terri-
tory set out in Section I of this Ordinance to be hereby annexed
to the City of Denton any lands or aria which are presently part
of and included within the limits of the City of Denton, or which
are presently part of and included within the limits of any other
City, Town or Village, or which are not within the City of
Denton's jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby excluded and
excepted from the territory to be hereby annexed as fully as if
such excluded and excepted area were expressly deL,:ribed herein.
SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective immediately
upon is passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the day of
1988.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
1988.
FLAY STEPHENSI 7OR
E
ATTEST:
i
IFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, RITY ATTORNEY
BY: LOU)
A-56/PAG.•' TWO
i
EXHIBIT "A"
ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part
of the J. Dickson Survey, Abet. No. 342 and A. Cannon Survey,
Abet. No. 232, and also being part of a tract of land as
conveyed from Henry C. Thompson, Jr. to R.D. Martin by deed
dated November 24, 1980 and recorded in Volvme 1048, Page 191 of
the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point
lying in the west ~ ,undary line of the tract described in
Ordinance No. 87-11O, said point also lying in the north
toundary line of said R.D. Martin Tract and the south boundary
line of the Old Alton Cemetery Tract, said point also lying
250.0' west of and perpendicular to the centerline of F.K. 21W
THENCE southeasterly along the present city limits as
established in said Ordinance 87-119 with a curve to the left
having a radius 1,396.261, a central angle of 190 34' 57.9"
and a chord bearing and length of south 200 22 01.9 east,
474.90', an arc length of 477.221 to a point lying in an
easterly boundary line of said Martin Tract for corner;
THENCE south 00 07' 45" west along an easterly boundary line
of said Martin Tract a distance of 455.49' to an inner ell
corner of said Martin Tract lying in the south boundary line of
u said Dickson survey and the north boundary line of said Cannon
survey for corner;
i
THENCE south 890 47' 45" east along the southerly north
boundary line of said Martin Tract, same being the south
boundary line of said Dickson survey and the north boundary line
of said Cannon survey a distance of 110.0' to a point for corner;
THENCE .youth 170 23' 11" east along the east boundary line of
said R.D. Martin Tract a distance of 142.7' to a point for
corner;
THENCE south 270 32' 29" east along the east boundary line of
said R.D. Martin Tract a distance of 695.35' to the southern
most corner of said R.D. Martin Tract same being a point lying
in the northeast boundary line of a tract conveyed to the United
States of America for corner;
THENCE north 550 59' 39" west along the southwest boundary
line of said Martin Tract and the northeast boundary line said
USA Tract a distance 948.32' to an inner all corner of said USA
Tract for corner;
A-56
r
I
4
EXHIBIT "A" (Con't)
THENCE north 160 52' 52" west along the west boundary line of
said R.D. Martin Tract and the east boundary line of said USA
Tract passing the north boundary line of said Cannon survey and
the south boundary line of said Dickson survey, passing at
i 1487.98' the southerly northwest corner of said R.D. Martin
` tract and the southwest corner of a tract described in a deed
from R.D. Martin et ux to Tim D. Masten at ux dated October 14,
1981 and recorded in Volume 1106, Page 730 of the D.R.D.C.T.,
continuing for a total distance of 1,855.35' to the northwest
corner of said Masten Tract, said point also lying in the south
right-of-way line of an east/west county road for corner;
THENCE south 890 18' 49" east along the north boundary line
of said Masten Tract and the south right-of-way line of said
county road, passing at 242.0' the northeast corner of said
Masten tract and the northerly northwest corner of said R.D.
Martin tract, continuing for a total distance of 484.62 to the
northerly northeast corner of said R.D. Martin Tract for corner;
THENCE south 10 21' 17" west along the westerly east boundary
' line of said R.D. Martin Tract a distance of 299.29' to a point
lying in the north boundary line of said Old Alton Cemetery
tract for corner;
THENCE south 890 44' 10" west along the northerly south
boundary line of said R.D. Martin Tract and the north boundary
line of said Old Alton Cemetery tract a distance of 20.8' to an
inner ell corner of said R.D. Martin Tract, same being the
northwest corner of said Old Alton Cemetery Tract for corner;
THENCE south 00 43' 57" west along the westerly east boundary
line of said R.D. Martin Tract and the vast boundary line of
the Old Alton Cemetery Tract a distance of 335.84' to an inner
ell corner of said R.D. Martin Tract and the southwest corner
of said 31d Alton Cemetery Tract for corner;
THENCE south 870 18' 0" east along the southerly north j
boundar line of said R.D. Martin Tract and the south boundary
line 0? said Old Alton Cemetery Tract a distance of 234.33' to
the Place of Beginning and containing 20.8309 acres of land.
i
i
A-56
f
PLAN uF SERVICE FOk ANNEXED AREA, L1TY OF LEhTOh,_TEXA5
1. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine
police services, using present personnel and equipment,
will be provided on tue ettective date of annexation.
B. Fire
Fire protection by the present personnel and equipment of
the tire fighting force, will be pro,i.ied on the ettective
date of annexation.
C. Water/Wastewater
Maintenance of public water and wastewater facilities will
begin within sixty (6U) days after the effective date of
the annexation for all facilities required to be maintained
by the City of Denton.
D. Refuse Collection
The same regular refuse collection service now provided
within the City will be extended to the annexed area within
sixty (4U) days after the etfective date of annexation.
E. Streets
1. Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.),
will begin on the etfective date of annexation,
4 2. Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present
City, will begin in the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation.
r
1. Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installation
of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and
gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need
therefore is determined by the governing body, will be
accomplished under the established policies of the City.
f
4. Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and
other traffic control devices will be installed as the
need therefore is established by appropriate study and.
traffic standards.
i
F. Inspection Services
Any inspection services now provided by the City (building,
electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will
begin in the anrexation area on the effective date of
annexation.
T T
Service Plan
Annexed Area
Page 2
G. Planning and Zoning
The planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City will
extend to the annexed area on the effective date wi
annexation. City planning wi'11 thereafter encompass
the annexed area and a zoning designation for the
property will be established.
H. Street Lighting
Street lighting will be installed in the substantially
developed areas in accordance witn the establisned
policies of the City.
1. recreation
Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effective
date of annexation. The same standards and policies now
used ir, the present t;ity will be followed in expanding the
recreational program and facilities in the enlarged City.
' J. electric Distribution
The City recommends the use of City of Denton for new
electric power.
A. Miscellaneous
Street name signs where needed will be installed within
approximately six (6) months after the effective date of
annexation.
F II. Capital Improtiements Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City is prioritized by such policy guidelines
as:
d
A. Demand for services as compared to other areas based
partly on density of population, magnitude of problems
compared to other areas, established technical standards
and professional studies, and natural or technical re-
straints a* opportunities,
8. Impact on the balanced growth policy of the t.ity.
C. Impact on overall City economics.
i
The annexed area will be considered for CIP in the upcoming
CIP plan, The annexation area will be judged according to
the same established criteria as ail other areas of the City.
N
i
ANNEXATION AEa
1
1
j
1 !
I ~
1 I 1
Comm
•I
f O •4 \ "
li
1{
S It ~
11
It
{
i ~ Il
I4
I ~ n
n
to
I
.
,
1
k 4 CW"
- . r
I
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
A-S6
s
/July 19, 1988 City CoLicil sets date, time and
place for public hearings
/July 22, 1988 Notice published in Denton Record
Chronicle for first public hearing
/August 2, 1988 City Council - first public hearing
August 5, 1988 Notice published in Denton Record
Chronicle for second public hearing
/August 16, 1988 City Council - second public hearing
August 31, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission makes
recommendation
September 6, 19.8 City Council institutes annexation
+t September 11, 1988 Publication of ordinance in Denton
Record Chronicle
October 18, 1998 final action by City Council
i i
3 ~
i
i
i
I
I
V
F6, minutes
August 31, 1988
Page 7
8. E-8. Make a recommendation cn a request for abandonment
oT-a 16 foot drainage and communications easement and
establishment of an B foot tommunicatlons easement at
Lot 4, Block B, The Ridge of Southridge.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Evans stated that an error in the
w t o t e easement was discovered when the petitioner,
` or. Vera Cershner, requested a fence permit. She said
the establishment of a l6 foot drainage and communications
easement at Lot 4, Block 8, The Ridge of Southridge, was
an error on the original plat document. It should have
been an eight foot communications easement,
Hs. Evans stated that the Development Review Committee
recommends approval.
DECISION: Mr. Fa►ean moved to recommend approval for
a an onment of a l6 foot drainage and tommunicatlons
easement and establishment of an eight foot communLca-
caRidge rried o (0.0).hrSdge.
tions tan4, Block S, d unanimously The
Mr.
Seconded by
Make
cres locat ed posed iinnexatLon
7"309 a
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that after a submittal
i o a p at Ear development of the Shady Oaks Mobile Home
park, the City Council requested said the proceed with
annexation of the property.
previously subdivided which required submission of the
a plat. The City Council directed staff to begin the
annexation process at a study session on May 17, 1988.
She said the property also includes ■ tract at the north-
west corner
tractfwasep~evlsly asubdlyided fromnthon the e tractlat,
but the
shown on the plat.
Ms. Carson continued that City services ere available In
the area including utllItIes. She said that FM 2181 is
a state road and no road improveaent would be necessary.
She added that the Council has held two public hearings,
and a copy of a letter from the owner ea pressing his
objections to the annexation it included with the reply
forms.
Mr. Holt asked If the area was coned. Ms, Carson stated
that the City annexed the Skyfab Addition and a SOO foot
strip along FM 2181 on July 7, 1987 to tie the city limits j
Into the Corinth city limits. This was toned temporary
agricultural (A).
DECISION: Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of A-S6.
L - econ a by Ms. Morgan and unanimously a cried (6.0).
I~ IV. Discussion of revisions to the sign ordinance.
Ms. Clarion st4ted a there four areas
to discuss regarding the revisions to the sign ordinance.
Ms. Carson stated that the first topic to be discussed
concerns a partial bai versus a total ban of portable signs.
She sold that a partial ban would be legally possible but
enforceement would be difficult. She said that non-commercial
messags old neither on nor off premise so additional portable
signs could be placed In the City. Examples would be churches
iplacing Bible verses on signs and non-profit agencies adv' rtis-
In` practices because fcommercial abusinosseskwouldfnot bevables.
wouldvpresentbproblems inlenforcementoofdthe ordinance, it
1
I
S
1
S
s
~ i
JJI=
4RH
J-1 livil Fill
JLJ
mill
Allif
i
i
DATE: October 6, 1988
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF 1988 TAX ROLLS
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Tax Roll for 1988 be approved
as submitted by the City of Denton Tax Office.
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 26.09e if the Texas Property
Tax Code, the governing body of the taxing unit must
approve the unit's Tax Roll each year.
BACKGROUND: A unit's Tax Roll consists of the Appraisal Roll with
the amount of tax entered. Our Appraisal Roll has be-n
approved by the Appraisal Review Board and certified by
Joe Rogers, Chief Appraiser for DCAD.
r
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Tax Department.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Ly~
STE .
I
RJPI~
oy arrcl
City Manager
Prepared by:
{
t
'Name Vic Schneider
Title Tax Technician
Approved:
me John F. McGrane
itle Executive Director of Finance
2633C/3
I
2521L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE DEN ONt TE, APPROVING THE 1988 TAX
ROLLS N PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DA
THE COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves the 1988 Tax
ROI1s o t e ity of Denton Texas in the amount of $12,65Y80790
based on the Certified Appraisal Roll as approved b ctthe App
Review Board of the Denton Central Appraisal
SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval,
1988.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
4
S
E HE S, R
3
ATTEST:
4
d
! j
JENNIFER ALTER , CIT SCR TAKY ~
f
i
( APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
$ DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
By,
s
htt
ti
r
Will i
I
I ,
t
i~
Jp
d
y
Yfi
I f
I
i
I
i
I
S,
i
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
II`
I
E
r
DATE: October 16, 1988 LL /
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FCRMAT (p
TO: Ftayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: POLICIES ANO PROCEDURES
t
r
RECOMMENDATION: _
k Recommend that Council approve an ordinance to include Martin Luther
King, Jr. Day as ^n official rity holiday.
SWfARY :
One ordinance will be presented for adoption.
BACKGROUND:
Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday was a-'opted through the 1988/89
Compensation Proposal. As a result, an ordinance to recognize this
holiday as an official city holiday will acccomplish implementation.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
All regular full and part time City employees
f
FISCAL 1t,PACT:
$141125 - All Funds $10,178 General Fund
$ 3,947 Other Funds
3 Red:
Pre r d by: omas w. D~recto
Personnel/Emf,loye Relations
APPrOv
e y is ean, xecu ve rec or 1
$ ff4unicipal Serv ces/Economic Cevelopment
503OP
I
}
a
1
C
NO.
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING THE ANNIVERSARY OF THE
BIRTHDATE OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AS AN OFFICIAL CITY HOLIDAYS
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
~FCTION I, That January 15th is the birthday of the late
Martin Luther King, Jr.
SECT=ON II. That the third Monday of each January, the data
of the official federal holiday for the recognition of the
anniversary of the birthdate of Martin Luther King, Jr., is hereby
designated as an official city holiday and the Municipal Building
shall be closed to the public on such day.
SECTION III. The City Manager shall comply with the admini-
strative Procedures E9t forth in Policy No. 107.02 regarding the
administration of this holiday with respect to City employees.
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately from its date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of October, 1988.
C
A
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
~ I
ATTEST:
t J
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY 1
1
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: ~~!►Z(CJ
i
ti
NO. _
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING THE ANNIVERSARY OF THE
BIRTHDATE OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AS AN OFFICIAL CITY HOLIDAY;
f AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the anniversary of the birthdate of Martin
Luther King, Jr., January 160 is hereby designated as an official
city holiday and the Municipal Building shall be closed to the
public on such day. Should this holiday occur on a Saturday, it
i will be oberved on the preceding Friday. Should this holiday fall
` on a Sunday, it will be observed the following Monday.
f
SEr-rION II. The City Manager shall comply with the admini-
strative Procedures set forth in Policy No. 107.02 regarding the
administration of this holiday with respect to City employees.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately from its date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of October, 1988.
RAY STBPHENS, MAYOR
,f
+ ATTEST:
i JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY 3,
k
i
i
i
addad 4t
t
1
P
k
ti
{ i
I
a
1
3
144 1
l
f
I
ti
I
2505L
NO.~
VILLAGE AND
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ENTRY IC;Ni6 CITY OF HIGHCLANDF
AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTO ,
` THE COUNTY OF DENTON RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT O A PROGRAM
PROVIDING COORDINATE EXPTHE ENDITURE NOF FOR EPURSUANTO TOO SA D
I TO FINANCE
2499;
CONTRACT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION That the Mayor is aandothe City ofeHighland
a reement etw een the City
Village and the County of Denton relating to thelgnninliahm~ntthe
cond£tions contained in
a program to financunderdthe terms and coordinate
extension of FM 2499,
agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
SECTION II. That the City Council hereby authorizes the
expen tuts o unds in the manner and amount as specified in the
agreement.
SECTION 111. aseah andraiprnve],shall become effective
That t
imme ate y upon its passage p
r'
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day o , 1988
I '
t`
ATTEST:
I
i
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: f
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: Q
STATE OF TEXAS S INTERLOCAL COOPERATION
5 AGREEMENT
COUNTY OF DENTON S
This INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT (together with any
amendments and supplements hereto, the "Agreement"), dated as
of August 1, 1988, executed by and among the COUNTY OF DENTON, -
TEXAS ("County"), the CITY OF DENTON ("Denton"), the CITY OF
HIGHLAND VILLAGE ("Highland Village") and any other political
subdivision of the State of Texas that becomes a party hereto
in accordance with the terms hereof:
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, County, Denton, and Highland Village are
M authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act (the .'Interlocal
Act"), Article 4413 (32c), Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as
amended, to enter into cooperative agreements among themselves,
and with and among other political subdivisions, for the
purpose of fulfilling and impl6menting their respective public
' and gove.snmental purposes, needs, objectives and programs; and
WHEREAS, County, Denton, and Highland Village have
determined that economy and efficiency can be achieved through
the establishment and administration of a cooperative program
(the "Program") to finance and coordinate the planning and
implementation in cooperation with the Texas Department of
Highways and Public Transportation for the extension of FM2499,
which each is authorized by law to do; and
WHEREAS, County, Denton, and Highland Village have
additionally determined that other political subdivisions that
are qualified to do so under the Interlocal Act should be
permitted to join with them as parties to this Agreement in
ordc to enhance and fulfill the purposes of the Interlocal Act
and . e r own respective public purposes by participating in
the IL gram (County, Denton, Highland Village and such other
additional parties hereto being herein collectively referred to
as the "Participating Political Subdivisions"); and
WHEREAS, County, Denton, and Highland Village agree, and
each additional political subdivision that becomes a
Participating Political Subdivision by its acceptance hereof
assents, to the creation and designation of the 2499 Task Force
("Task Force") as the administrative agency and instrumentality
of the County, and as the administrative agency of the
Participating Political Subdivisions under the Interlocal Act
in implementing the Program and performing the functions
specified herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, County, Denton, and Highland Village, and
such additional political subdivisions as assent hereto, have
agreed and hereby do agree as follows, to-wit:
Section 1. Creation __and urooses of the Program (a)
County, Denton, and H g lan Village hereby agree to cause the
Program to be established for their benefit and for the benefit
of the other Participating Political Subdivisions.
(b) The Program shall be implemented and administered
in accordance with and subject to the terms of this Agreement.
(c) The bensfito, efficiencies sand cost the
avingsnthare t (an accrue obtain
the
Participating Political Subdivisions by concurrent financing
and cooperation, and (2) to take all necessary steps to have
FM2499 extended North from FM407.
Section 2. Creation Powers and Duties of Administrative
Aged y. I
(a) It a agreed that the Participating Po t ^+l
Subd visions shall authorize the creation of the Task Force.
Tathe other
Participating PoliticaloSubdivisions a designate 8 the and
sk Force
as their administrative authority under the Interlocal Aunt to
perform the following services and functions, to-wit:
(i) to prepare and develop plans for the
implementation of the Program;
(ii) to designate and retain professional
services as may be appropriate for engineering studies,
legal functions, and any other services which may be
deemed necessary for implementation of the Program;
(iii) to coordinate with Highways and Public Transportation h for dimplementation of
the Program;
(iv) to raise funds necessary for planning and 4
implementation of the Program from public or private
sources;
way and(all governmental pwAte tou implement sthe Program;
(vi) to perform any functions and dutios imposed
by it under the terms of the contract, or other agreement
to which it is a party.
Section 3. Obli ations of Participating- Political
Subdivisions. (a) T e payment or performance o governments
eee~r
.2-
f
functions, services and obligations of the Task Force shall be
made from current revenues available to the paying
Participating Political Subdivisions or from other funds raised
by the Task Force.
responsible forh-funding ticipaf ithe P asktiForceubinVithen following
amountar
County $50,000
Denton $25,000 After Highland Village $25,000 o) the authorization
wqq
Denton, and by Highland respective
bodies,
ill ereach
appoint three members to a Board of Directors ("Board"), which
will become the governing body of the Task Force.
Section Additional Parties Wi hdrawals. 1 (a) Any
"local government," as of nod n the Interlocal 'Act, may
become a party to this Agreement if approved by the Board and
' by the execution of an Additional Party Agreement substantially
in the form and substance attached hereto as Exhibit A.
(b) Any Participating Political Subdivision may
wi^hdraw from this Agreement it any time by giving 30 drys
written notice to all Participating Political Subdivisions and
the Task Force. It is provided, however, that such withdrawal
shall not reduce, diminish or impair any then outstanding
obligations of the withdrawing political subdivision.
section 5. Public Meetings and Records All meetings of
the Board of Directors or t- eF-Task Force s a 1 be open to the
public and notice thereof shall be given in accordance with the
requirements of Article 6252-17, Vernon's 'texas Civil Statutes,
as amended, and all records of the Task Force shall be open to
public inspection in accordance with Article 6252-17a, Vernon's'
Texas Civil Statutes, as amended,
section 6. TTe~rrmm,,,~ The term of this Agreement shall be
one year from theme hereof and shall automatically be
renewed for one year on each anniversary of the commencement
except with respect to any Participating Political Subdivisions
that may have withdrawn herefrom in accordance with Section S
hereof.
Section 7, 0_~her Governmental Programs The execution
of the Agreement by any articipat ng Po t ail Subdivision
does not n any manner limit, impair, diminish or affect its
right or power to participato in anyy other governmental
programs by interlocal agreement or othe$wiso#
-3-
r
of the Task nForceAcne accorian herevothe 'this tAgreementeshall
be submitted to the Task Force for its approval, acceptance and
which, hereinbshalelow
be provide
in d full force andeeffectution of
EXECUTED AND DELIVERED
Denton, and initially by and between County,
Highland Village on and as of day and year
first above written. the
COMMY OFD N
BY ~
cQ I t~
ATTEST: ` Count . ge
J
s ~ 1
Coup y C er o Cler of the y~
Commissioner's Court
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
By Le
ATTEST: Mayo
i
~ i
Secretary
r
CITY OF HIGHLAND VILLAGE, TEXAS
i
i
By /s/~
Ir ATTESTi Mayor
C ty Secretary
aeasr
ACCEPTANCE BY TASK FORCE
The 2499 Task Force hereby accepts the terms and
provisions of the above and foregoing Agreoment and agrees to
be bound thereby to the extent required therein, al) on and as
of this day of 1988.
2499 TASK FORCE
(SEAL) By /s/
Cha r
ATTEST:
,
/s/
Se.retary
t;
R
f,
r
ff
I
~5 1
1
I
7
I
f
{ I
*stir
S ~ `
Exhibit A
Additional Party Agreement
The below named political subdivision of the State of
Texas, acting by and through the undersigned duly authorized
officer(s), by this instrument agrees to become a Participating
Political Subdivision under, but strictly subject to, the terms
and provisions of that certain interlocal Cooperation
s Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1988, and initially executed
by and among the County of Denton, the City of Denton, and the
City of Highland Village,
Executed this day of 1988.
(District) (City) (County) etc.
By
Duly Authorized OEf cer
4
'a
k
i
p. I
i
I
t
F
i
1
I
Y
r,
l
1101
i
ADDENDUM
INTERLOfAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
The following items are hereby added to the above
agreement:
All milestone phases of roadway alignment
development will be reviewed and approved
by City of Denton, City of Highland Village,
and Denton Count., prior to Task Force approval.
2) The Task Force shall prepare and submit a budget
of projected expenditures to the City of Denton,
City of Highland Village and Denton County for
their approval prior to reimbursement of any
project costs.
3) The above two requirements shall bs included
in the text of the agreement between the
Task Force and the Consttltant (s).
4) CAll contracts onsultart Is)bshall nbe the Task approved obyeCiand
ty of
Denton, City of Highland Village and Denton
County.
i
i'
f
i
F
v
~y
i
i
-7-
Y
MOM
LIM=
LIM=
UZI=
LEE=
LIZ=
UZI=
s
t
l
i
f
C
~a
n
U 3=
LL -
s
1
I
~ I
9
i
i.
f
city 0f DENTON
,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BWLDfNG /
DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TEL EPHONE 366.8200
i
I
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 13,
1988
f T0:
Lloyd V. Harrell,
FR City Manager
OM: John F
McGrane, Executive
SUBJECT; SEPTEbIBER BUDGET Director of Finance
REPORT
Once again, with the resorts Year has come closing of the month of t
p will not an end. Although September, another
{ the accruals be available until the the final
favorable result are made, the e audit is final Year end
s for the General preliminary and all
In the General numbers Indicate h
compared to Fund, total actual
collected as o budget °f 21 973 425 venues
pposed were 12 983 633
were delinquent t0 $13, 8 121 Taxes were as f
1 franchise taxes 000eudgeted. Areas Vero ,4sf
Texas Powerax ($134,000 - ($6i2 includes sales tax ($S10000)budget
iginal bud & Light franchise tax audit settlement ' GTE
budget get)- Other ($61,145 and .he
mixed Drln JOCtions were Sammons tax areas that was not 1.1 the
Beverage gross receipts, andnbankfons franchise tmet, t
ax,
In the areas of fines and franchise taxes.
$170,000, This fees, revenues
was maril
1 0~0))o Animal prolfi n o were under
Control y due
t 4t Fire budgeted es
serve fis ($25, o 300) and Department fines
ce fees ($1 j0r areas exceeding bud ° auto
31600), and f gg pound fees E
Under ire inspections ($13,1pp~ ambulance
the categor
category were y of licenses and
$355,800 significantly under permits, revenues
discussed with actual revenues be for_ this
related permitsrfor reports tho big tpr$
Oblem, 118 lareaTO t sawerelhbuiIb en
ding
i
i
Memo to Lloyd V. ilarrell
October 13, 1988
Page 2
Miscellaneous revenues were $39,600 under budget with
shortfall in street cut revenues
in major
Interest income, revenues w~. ($S4 1,668). the set Under the category
($81 000) which heI were substantially over bud
_
Finally, intra-fundptransfersshwere ort alls of lother fundin budget
areas.
for Engineering charges to bond fund r y on target except
year under budget ($80,000), P ojects which ended the
On the expenditure side of
c and encumbrances were the General Fund, total expenditures
f 22 769 226. $22 354,829 as compared to a
except ons tha~st departmen s came in under budget wlthEal of
1 ordinance that went to Ccrnciltearlier this month,end few
adjustment
Overall, the General Fund ended the fiscal !
exceeding expenditures. Year with revenues
met or bud eted Areas where budgeted revenues were not s
g expenditures were exceeded
within
eothercdepargtmentalebudgetors in other were offset by
{ areas or savings
Once again 1 would like to reiterate that these numbers are only
w preliminary and when final numbers become available, I will be
SuPPlying them to you along with next
;
reports, fiscal year's monthly
It you have any questions regarding
additional information, please advise. the above or need any
o n c sane i
JFMcG:af
3910F
i
i
t
F
END
~ OF
FILE