HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-07-1989
f
i
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
March 7, 1989
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
March 7, 1989, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civtl Defense Room of City
Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following
items will be considered:
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work session may
also be considered as part of the Agenda for the
Regular Meeting.
5:30 p.m.
1. Consideration of proposed draft legislation to change
laws governing military service buy-back provisions
and probationary period buy-back for certain employees
under TMRS.
2. Receive a report regarding the proposed Development
Plan Water and Sewer Lines.
3. Recoive information on Airport lease rates.
i
4. Receive a report from the Council sub-committee
investigating the proposed closing of Bell Avenue for
Spring Fiing.
i '
5. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Att. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Consideration of appointments to the Airport
Board, the Human Services Committee, the
Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission,
the Library Board and the Low/Moderate
Income Housing Task Force.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
March 7, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. In the Council chambers of city
Hall, 215 K. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following
items will be considered:
i
r
f
f
E
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 7, 1989
Page 2
h
7:00 P.M.
1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of February 7 and the special called meeting
of February 19, 1989.
2. Receive a report from the Chair of the Planning and
---1 Zoning Commission regarding the sign ordinance.
3. Public Hearings
A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of a
resolution adopting the boundaries of moderate
activity center number 78 as part of Appendix A
of the Denton Development Plan; and amending the
intensity planning area boundary map. (The
Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval).
B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of a
resolution adopting the boundaries of moderate
activity center number 76 as part of Appendix A
of the Denton Development Plan; and amending the
intensity planning area boundary map. (Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval).
4• Consider approval of street widths on Oak between
Carroll and Bonnie Brae and on Hickory between Welch
and Bonnie Brae.
S. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 6.A. 6.6, 6.r,). This listing is
provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to
discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance.
J
1
1
r
City of Dentin City Coancil Agenda
March 7, 1989
Pays 3
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid 09947 - Fiberglass Stroetlight P010s
2. Bid $9948 - Crossacm Airswitch
3, Bid 49950 - Herbicides & insecticides
F 4, Bid 49952 - Utility Poles
5. Bid 09954 - Transformer Conversion
h '
6, Bid 49937 - 1988 Utilities C.I.P.
7, Bid 09951 - Electrical Substation Package
(Materials)
II 8. P.O. #89093 - Amwell - Clarifier Replacement
E
Parts Excluding Drive Unit & Drive Unit
Repair at Water Plant
I 1 B. Plata and Replats
1. Consider the preliminary replat of Audra
Meadows, Lots 25 and 26, Block A; Lots 20
through 34, Block B; and Lots 27 through 47,
Block A. (Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval),
C. Tax Refunds
1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Kent
W. Key/North Park Savings
2, Consider approval of a tax refund for Luther
McCrae Etal/Olney Savings
I
3, Consider approval of a tax refund or
Stanley D. ivie/Olney Savings
Ih 4, Consider approval of a tax refund for Olen
W. Justice
6, ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
{ contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
v i
J
I
w
' City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 7, 1989
Page 4
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
t contracts for public works or improvements.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for purchases of
materials or equipment which are available from
only one source in accordance with the provisions
of state law exempting such purchases from
requirements of competitive bids.
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of
Denton. Texas, providing for the renaming of
f Pockrus Road to Pockrus Page Road.
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance awarding a
contract for Individual and Aggregate Stop-Loss
i coverage to Southern Risk Specialists, Inc.
7. Rcnolutions
!
A. Consider approval of a resolution rejuesting the
closing of a portion of Bell Avenue from East
Hickory to Prairie April 22 and 23, 1989 for
Spring Fling.
B. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily
closing Fry Street between the intersection of
Oak Street and Hickory Street On Sunday, April
16, 1969 for the Fry Street Fair.
C. Consider approval of a resolution supporting the
Denton Police Department Training Academy.
D. Consider approval of a resolution approving the
guidelines for funding and selecting Development
Plan Candidate Water and Sewer Lines: providing
for the process to be followed in approving
Development Plan Candidate Water and Sewer
Lines. (The Planning and Zoning Commission and
the Public Utilities Board recommend approval)
8. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
9, official Action on Executive session items:
A. Legal Matters
! B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
J
i
s
r
City of Denton City Council Agenda
March 7, 1989
Page 5
10. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
11. Executive session:
i
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
_ V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
C E R T I F I C A T E
1 I
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
1989 at o'clock
on the day of
(a.m.) (p.m.)
r CITY SECRETARY
II
3053C
i
J I
I
LEE=
J1
i
4 ~
k
' 39
cirY of ormrom, rBx s 215 E. MCKINNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 565.8200
M E M C F A A' D U M
TOs Betty McKean, Executive Director
Municipal Services/Economic Development J
FROM: Thomas W. klinck, Director 1
Fersonnel/Employee Relations
DATEr February 6, 1989
I
SUBJECT: TMRS Legislative Changes - Follow-Up to January 30, 1989, Memorandum
Betty, I understand you have discussed my January 30, 1969, memorandum with
the City Manager concerning the TMRS legislative changes on military service
and probationary period buy-back. His question revolves around the reason why J
the Board did not consider our proposal for prior service buy-back changes.
I have discussed further the December 10, 1988, TM1tS Board Meeting with
j Charles Hinton, City Attorney in Garland, and Brad Nabors, Assistant City 1
Attorney. In that meeting we presented our J
service buy-back. The Board's concern (primarilysfromoa FlrefighterpBoard ll
Member from Waco) was they would not want to burden the employee with an
additional up-front cost that Is already
addition, there was some discussion abouttheipriwith this provision. r
p
provision being consistent with other retirement plans, service buy-back current J
plan grew out of an original TML plan where the prior servicerbuy backh(inMIts 1
current form) was in place. Finally, it appears that the City of Denton is +
the only city that has a concern about this option and the only one suggesting
changes.
I will be happy to brief the Mayor and Council Members concerning these
proposed changes at a work session to determine if they concur with the
proposed legislation to change military service credit buy-back and
inco+purate the probationary period previously excluded. The City Attorney of
Garland will be discussing this issue with his Council Members on February 6
(his City Manager hat no objections to it). If they are in concurrence, he
will draft a letter to Jimmie Mormon of TMRS supporting the legislation. If
our Council Members are favorable to this, I will do the same.
Should you require further information concerning this, I will be happy to
respond, Thank you.
i
i
~ J
Thomas W, K nn cc
5267P/020689:0205
I
5
1
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS 215 E. MMINNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE (817) 568.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Betty i'cFean, Executive Director
Municipal Services/Economic Development
I
FROM, Thotas w. xlinck, Director
Personne;/Employee Relations
j DATE: January 3:1# 1969
SUBJECT: TMRS LegiC ative Changes - Military Service and Probationary Period
i Buy-Back
I
Betty, on January 27, 1969, I received a call from Jimmie Mormon from the Texas
Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) explaining proposed draft legislation to make
changes to the levy governing military service buy-back provisions and probationary
period buy-back for certain employees. While we have not yet seen the legislation, ;
Jimmie assures me that he has sponsors aligned touintroducenthis,legislation and
would like to know if t,yese are appropriate
1
The military service buy-back provision would be changed to allow an employee who
has up to five years of active military service to purchase credit in the TMRS
system. The employee would be required to pay the up front money of !15/month for
each active month of service up to five years. The City's contribution, however,
woult be spread over the contribution period (25 years). The City would have to
adopt this by ordinance ane it would apply to employees who have ten years of
service (or would attain ten years of service). The employee would have a one year +
'window' in order to exarcire this option.
The probationary period buy-hack would apply only to current employees who were
hired prior to January 1, 19771 and whore probationary time was previously
excluded. The cost would be amortized over 25 years, and no coat would be incurred
by the employee. This provision would also have to be adopted by ordinance and
would apply only to current employees.
1 would appreciate your discussing this with Lloyd and determining if these are
f acceptable changes to the law tlat would meet our City's needs. I realize they are
roasonable
not completely our original thoulhta, but in my mind they
letter
comprise. Should we find these are appropriates i will from the Mayor to indicate our support.
i If you have further qu!stiona concerning this, I will be happy to respond. Thank
you.
Thomas W. lincc
5251P/013069:1045
I
4 ti
a
TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIRLMEVT SYSTFJN 1200 NCRTIt INTERSTATE 35. Ac 52/47e-7577
P051 OFFICt 80x2225
AUSTIN,TrxAS 78768
January 27, 1989
1
Mr. Thomas Klinck
Director of Personnel
City of Denton
215 East McKlnney
Denton, Texas 76201
DearTomi
Enclosed Is a copy of the proposed legislation that we discussed today. When you were here In
December at the Board meeting, you discussed certain budgetary problems that Denton would ,
experience It Military Service Credit was adopted In Its present form. Hopefully, those
problems would be eliminated by the proposed bill.
We have sponsors for the proposed bill, but before moving forward with the legislation, we
j would like to hear from Denton and Garland as to whether or not our proposed legislation
would eliminate the budgetary problems the City would experience under present law. i
Charles Hinton has Informed us It will be February 6th before he would be meeting with the
Council regarding the Military Service legislation. We will need to have a response from
Denton and Garland as quickly thereafter as possible as to whether the proposed changes in the
Act will be acceptable.
We have also included a provision to take care of those employees who were put through a
probationary period before being enrolled In TMRS.
Sincerely,
Jimmie L. Mormon, Director
JLM/pjh
I
I
I
I
E
I
i
k
e
Y
}
1
k
City of Ga rla nd
NN Off Its Box 411002 f 0erland, Taxes 7 60 41 100 2
February 11 1989 s-
HAND DELIVERED (FEDERAL EXPRESS
Tom Klinck
Director of Personnel
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney Street
Denton, TX 76201
REt TMRS Military Buy-back
Dear Tomt
i
Enclosed please find the proposed legislation prepared by the TMRS
staff. Although this is not what we originally requested, I
believe it approximates the desire of the Garland City Council
as to reducing the initiation fees for military buy-back.
4 I will present this legislation Monday night to tha City Council
and recommend to them its approval. This is based on the letter
4 which I previously forwarded to you from Virgil Gray, City Manager
of Brownwood and a member of the TMRS board. A copy of his letter
is enclosed.
Sincere y,
Charles M. Hinton, Jr.
City Attorney
CMHimb
Enclst 2
cct James Spore, City Manager
j City of Garland
Nancy Carney, Director of Personnel
J{ City of Garland
facsimilat Greg Hoosgr
P. 0. Box 13478
Austin, TX 78711
An Equal Opporlunity Employer
LJ
~ r
tx
_ b. No.
By
A SILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to membership in, benefits from, and administration of
the Texas Municipal Ratirement System.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LECISLATVRE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 61.0?1(8), Title 1108, Revised
Statutes, is amended to read as follows:
(6) "Employes" means a person who receives j
compensation from and is certified by a municipality as being
regularly engaged in the performance of duties of: 1
(A) an appointive office or position that
normally requires services from the person for not less than
1,000 hours a year; or
(9) an elective office that normally requires
services from the person for not less than 1,000 hours a year,
in a municipality that began participating in the retirement
system after December 31, 1981, or that has adopted a membership
requirement under Section 62.107 of this subtitle. 1
person eerrIna a period of orobationant
Injoy ,ent is an "e:r_n]ov e" if otherwise within this definition.
SECTION 2. Amend Subchapter D of Chapter 63 Subtitle a,
} Title 1109, Revised Statutes, by adding thereto a new Section
numbered Section 63.303, reading as follows:
ELI g~lar servico credit for tirobatio~arv esplavment,
141 g'he_goyernlrg body of - s participating
!.9!]igAPAIAt L which prior to Janus 1 1989, engaged persons
boginning work with the runicipality on a tem2or_iy or
probationary basis for a specified period and consequently did
not enroll the person as a re mbar of the System until the
probstio~yal]! period expired. mav_ by ordinance or r solution
allow prior service credit for service performed dun ng the
period of probationary_emplgvment (not exgeeding six loonths).
Al A member msy clai prior service credit under
this gection by filing a det■ileA ■twtenon,k~jf such service witfa
the city- clerk or eecretaa y of the municipAlity for which the
service was performed at any tire within one year from the
1
effective date of the ordinance or r~aelt,tinn ,.utheriLina slab
E credit.
Sri As soon as pYacticabl• after amember has filed
statement of prior service under this section._the affected
punicipality shall verify the prior service cla med and certify
to the board of trustees the credit* lzla prior service (not
lxceeding six montbsl appl9y ed and the average sonthly
corPens Lion paid to the member during the period of
probationary employrent.
M Attar receiving a certiticatign of prior lpervicg
ender this Sqction and the-ay erag• comoansation paid the se er.
the &ard of Trustees shall Qete nine the prior ,-USA"
allowable to the sember in the ranner provided in Section 63.305
oftbis. ovbtitle.
i
I
SECTION 3. Subsection (e) ol Section 63.502 of Title 1108,
Revised Statutes, is hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. Section 53.503 (b) of Title 110B, Revised
Statutes, is amended to read as follows
(b) When a perewi who has military service credit
retires, the retirement system shall transfer to the current
service annuity reserve fend the jMDulated amount (amennts)
paid by the person (and--the --emp}eying --mnnieipaIity) under
Section 63.502 of this subtitle, (snbtitler) and an amount
fros the municipality - 9~~5 '"P th• municipality accumulation
fund eoval to the accumulated amount paid by the person times
i a municivality's current service metchtna o,rcent in effect on
I e
63
the date the member apWU s limit-under cligz-Al. 502 of
&U! subtitle. The retirement system shall use the amounts to
make annuity payments to the person computed in the same manner
as is the person's current service annuity, but the credit and
the amounts may not be used in other computations, including _
computations of updated service credits, antecedent service
credits, prior service credits, or special prior service
credits.
i
i
7
r
i
I
k
B Be No.
I
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
h
I relating to rembership in, benefits from, and administration of
the Texas Municipal Retirement System.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION le Section 61.001(8), Title 110B, Revised
r Statutes, is amer0 ed to read as follows:
(8) "Employee" means a person who receives
compensation from and is certified by a municipality as being
regularly engaged in the performance of duties of:
(A) an appointive office or position that
i
normally requires services from the person for not less than
1,000 hours a year; or
(B) an elective office that normally requires
services from the person for not less than 1,000 hours a year,
in a municipality that began participating in the retirement
system after December 310 1981, or that has adopted a membership
requirement under Section 62.107 of this subtitle..
A person serving ~p~riod of probationary
0212vment is an "emflloyee" if otherwi~s ~i*hin this definition.
SECTION 2. Amend Subchapter D of Chapter 63 Subtitle C,
Title 13080 Revised Statutes, by adding thereto a new Section
numbered Section 63.303, reading as follows;
;63,303. Prior service credit for probationary emo1440~,
V
i
F
1!1 The governing body of a car I..e
rr►unicicali~y vhich Drior to Jane,+.+-+. 1 loge
p_eraons
beginning work xi * the
unicinality on a temaorerv or
probationary
nOt &U-Qll the eerann .a a w ,nh.r
~ the a„ste-ti-
probationary MLO expired- may by erd{na • _
Allox priQ~~ervice__S it for ssrvi e o rform d during
period of probe Son^~y emolo ant Inot excee~{n...m.. -
~ u ncns] .
a LQX-AMICO credit tinder
this section by tiling a detailed statement of su~fi_68~4 with
the city clerk or war etnrv oft u
i he m nic~tality for xhi r+
mervise was d!-formed at any
time xithin one year frem
effective date of tb2 ordinange or resnl,,~tion authorixin_ er sy~
credit.,.
!91 As soon as tractic~ble. after a membe_ r_ has filed
a statement of nr{nr
~ servie. ,nd. this section th att
municinalitY ehAll Verify the er{nr se +
to the board of «w cr _
prior se_ryice fnot
lXcp..Ld a six mOhthsl aocrevad, and r~ ayeraae monthly
SS,►~t1on paid the me*+>,.. durine *h
period of
p.Cp~ationarv emoloyme=t,
~ ([ter receiving a certlficatien of priorr~
under this c~~~{,,,. . a comeena.t{
on fleid the me ar
the Board of T ,.♦s.. -hall determine tr,. +
. .er i e reCi
i~.39~~t1s to them ~.r t., the. manner
3 _provid4~rs_Saction 63.106
Of thin
' i
i
I
r
G
t
I
SECTION 3. Subsection (c) of Section 63.502 of Title 1108,
i
Revised Statutes, is hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. Section 63.503 (b) of Title 1108, Revised
Statutes, is amended to read as followas
(b) When a person who has military service credit
retires, the retirement system shall transfer to the current
service annuity reserve fund the accumulated amount (amounts)
paid by the person (end--the--eaploying--munfefpatfty) under {
Section 63.502 of this sub&itle. (subtltler) and an_amount
h from the Unicipality account in the municipality accumulation
fund eaval to the accumulated amount paid by the person times
the runicipality's current service matching percent in effe"t on
i
the date the member applies for credit under Section 63.502 of
i
this subtitle. The retirement system shall use the amounts to
make annuity payments to the person computed in the same manner
f as is the person's current service annuity, but the credit and
the amounts may not be used in other computations, including
I
computations of updated service credits, antecedent service
credits, prior service credits, or special prior service
credits.
i
i
i
I
11
1
_ 8. No.
BY
A BILL TO HE ENTITLED
AN ACT
r
s from,
to mombezehip in, benefit
the Taxes Municipal Retirement Syatam.
HE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TE%ASS
SECTION 1. section 61.001(5), Title 1108, Revised
Statutes, :s amended toread at follows'
parson who receives
Exp1oY
Jed from and is certifby a municipality as being
h
` regularly engaged in the performance of duties
oaition that
(A) an appointive office or p
the person for not less
requires services from than
1,000 hours a years or
(8) an elective attic* that normally requires i
loss
from the person for not than 1,000 hours a year,
ality that began participating in the retirement
in a munioip
system after December 31, Se51, or that has adopted a membership
requirement under Section 62.107 of this subtitle.
A D~a[son---!
eta defirtiLl4II•
tsr 63 subtitle 6,
P SECTION 2. Amend Subchapter Dot nap
ised statutes, by adding thereto a new Section
Title 1108, Rev
nunbered Section 63.301, reading ►y tollovat
~ {61y]Q1. pt14Z1lLYiGLSSl41S t°r °z^",rynery_S~p19YIlRBi+ '
i
1
I
e
3.,
a
~ 1~ ao arnina Dodv of rertlcloetlna
ni irelity vhicR ...pZ1oz to
en a tea*+nr~ er
tsgi~ina vorl '•h tha municirnllSY
riod end CQIl`•"S`ni1V did
rzobetiona r' Deeie [or a ■recitiid~
~ - -ewer of tht~y`~em~. 'n- t- it tRe
~ ~ enroll__ih! e•raon a:
~ ~w eten~~~ e~Yi d s b ordln+ ce oz rts9lYs.14n
i I ins credit tor_!~n'ic! oerfo~•d during the
~ !11441.-JPS.tsz
1~ of rrob+tionnry emrlofront foot exoeedina siac months!.
f a mem er m ~iim orloz service credit under
this
i
r ■ny Lima vi~hin ona year from the
servi a --Vas restm~L
_ttma---y Gate of-~p~ erdlnen a or rtsolution gut*.ozis na euch
~ ~_aooe as rr+c is b1e +ftez t ~s+^tier R.,.~ a_~-Eil~d
; a +t+temt"• oL e113=. illertiu N " this section he affected
lams med-+nd s~it1LY
yy~~+Sity ehall~~-~-p~i
• ~h~ beard reditnDle erior aerviee toot
..,nt~e1 er d and he +wr+a monthly
i es°gsad~na e
a
~ ~ ~ertiEic+tlon~f rrior eerY14!
I
ypq~r this Sectionl~0--ihe everaae eomoeneation raid the me erg
erviee credit
tees sh+31 deteneine the ~r14S-!
%he
r .ta.e in 6ection_!3. OS
i1.L ...•,~e to=t a mew[,, a*t mnnner~s
of this su UU11.
I
I
1
r..
I
SECTION 3. Subsection (c) of Section 63.502 of Title 1100,
Revised Statutes, is hereby repealed.
SECTION 1. Section 63.503 (b) of Title 1100, Revised
Statutes, is amended to read as follow n
i
I (b) when a person who has military service credit
retires, the retirement system shall transfer to the current
service annuity reserve fund the aecumulated saount (amounts) I
paid by the person (anA--tka--asp}ey~nq--men4e4pe114y) under +
Section 61.502 of this subtitle. (60titler) And an amount
from the mUnigiealitY account In the municipality accumulation
I
fund egual to the accumulated amount
geld by the person time■ i
j the ggo1cipalitv's currant servico matching eery n! in effect on
i
the dste the member ..plies for credit under Section 0.502 of
this subtitle- The retirement system shall use the amounts to J
make annuity payments to the person computed In the same manner
as is the persons current service annuity, but the credit and
the amounts may not be used in other computations, including
computations of updated service credits, antecedent service
credits, prior service credits, or special prior service
credits.
i
•r
M1y
I.
J
a
5 1
a
1
I
li
{
I
II A
{
I IT
I
I
i
,j
March 7, 1989 36
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO., MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL J
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager I
RE: CONSIDER RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR SELECTING THE
"DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER AND SEWER LINES" TO BE FUNDED BY
THE CITY OF DENTON THROUGH ITS UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN IN SUPPORT OF THE BALANCED GROWTH AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT GROWTH POLICIES OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN;
APPROVING THE METHODOLOGY TO BE USED IN THE PUBLIC
INVESTMENT STUDY REQUIRED BY THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
DETERMINE WHAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS QUALIFY FOR CITY
I INCENTIVES; PROVIDING FOR THE PROCESS TO BE FOLLOWED IN
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER AND SEWER LINES; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
ACTION REQUIRED: A
Approval of subject guidelines and attacheO Resolution.
` i
SUMMARY:
The Public Utilities Board, in response to the Dentor
Development Plan as adopted by the City Council, proposed in
their 1989-93 Capital Improvement Plan to budget $500,000/year
in each year of the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan to meet
the Balanced Growth and Economic Development" goals of the
City of Denton. The attached guidelines document specifies how
and when these candidate lines and Industrial Developnent
Infrastructure Assistance (IOIA) funds are to be evaluated,
ranked, and funds committed.
The Public Utilities Board recommended approval of these
guidelines on November 16, 1988. Tae Planning and Zoning
Commission, at a joint meeting with the Public Utilities Board,
recommended approval of these guidelines on February 8, 1989.
- .1 PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, Developers, and
Citizens.
cISCAL IMPACT:
j $500,000 per year for water and sewer lines.
a_
CC Meeting
Page 2
Resq full s b fitted,
I Y. a r y
Mager
6pare y
4Z , i
av am, rector o ater _
Wastewater Utilities
AP,D+' ved
. Ne son, xecu ve rec or +
Department of Utilities
l Document I Guidelines for Funding and Selecting ;
Exhibit I Criteria for Ranking Balanced Growth Utility Lines
(Residential/Commercial Candidates)
I
H Industrial Development Infrastructure Assistance Study
111 Criteria for Ranking Economic Development Utility Lines
IV Flow Chart Approval Process for Development Plan Water
and Sewer Lines
Document I1 Resolution
Minutes PUB Meeting of November 16,,1988
I
j
1
6325U:1-2
i
I
t
DOCUMENT I
Guidelines for Funding a Selecting Development
Plan Candidate Water and Sewer tines
upon annual review and during preparation of the Utility
Department Five Year Capital Improvements Plan, and subsequent 1
finalization of the Utility Department Operating Budget, and
with the approval of the Public Utilities Board, $500,000 of
Utility Department Capital Improvements funds for the current
year may be Sewer Lines, provided suchr exDenton penditure vdoes mnot create an Water and
hardship on the rate payers of the Utilities and is seen to be
in the best interest of the community,
I
The $500,000 to be placed in the Utility Department Capital
Improvements Plan for the purpose of the Development Plan water
purposes. The egoalhaof thesedefundstdedicatedwoto( the pDent n
Development Plan is to lead growth to certain geographical areas
of the City and to encourage economic development via extension
of water and sewer lines for industrial developments. i
The 00 designated in the PlaUtility Water Department Capital Lines"
Improvements Plan a as s "Development
(Exhibit 111) shall be distributed as follows:
1, $100,000 shall be set aside to service residential and
commercial type development(sthe specific sites shall be
determined and prioritized by the ranking methodology '
outlined in Exhibit I, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof. Exhibit I shall be reviewed and
approved by the Public Utilities Board on an annual basis
in order to assure that all factors relating to the ranking
of a project reflect current economic and financial
conditions. Other such approvals as may be necessary shall
also be obtained prior to final approval of proposed
development(s),
- 2, 5400,000 shall be set aside for industrial development
purposes. Suih funds sha11 be dedicated when an actual
prospect is available and after such development has been
analyzed using criteria for evaluating industrial
development infrastructure assistance programs as outlined
in Exhibit 11 attached herewith. If an industrial prospect
does not materialize within the first six (6) months of the
Y fiscal year, the funds may be redirected to either
Industrial site candidate lines or residential/commercial ecomm
nda theePublictUtilitiesnBoardtand approvalnbyrthe Ciety Co ncil~.
l
k
f ~
I
K
i
C
l
p i.
I
3. The Executive; Director of Finance of the City will assure
that funds are encumbered for "dedicated" projects and
transferred forward into the next fiscal year.
Unspent and unencumbered Development Plan Water and Sewer
tine funds may not be carried forward to a future year.
r
V I
I
1
I 1
y
I ~ JII
k
i~
M
1
b325U:3-4
1)
J
I I ,
s.
re
a
S
y
EXHIBIT I
Criteria for Ranking Balanced Growth Utility Lines
Residential/Commercial Candidates
Introduction
This ranking system has been designed to prioritize the list of
residential and commercial development plan candidates for the
Utility Cvpital Improvement Plan's designated "Development Plan
Water and Sewer Lines". It is recognized that the development
potentials considered by this ranking system may change from year to
year as physical developments progress in specific areas. It shall
~ be necessary, therefore, to review the ranking of projects on an
annual basis to take into consideration changing circumstances.
1. Development Potential in the Short Term
I
Access by improved thoroughfare 1-6*
No announcements
E Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare 7-13**
Announcements
E Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare 14-20***
Announcements
Zoning
Plats
'Developer has not made an announcement for developing his
property and has not platted for development. Thoroughfare and
.oning, however, do exist.
**Developer has announced to the City Staff his intention to
develop and to follow up with platting. Thoroughfare and zoning,
however, do exist.
***Developer has announced and platted his development to the
City Staff; thoroughfare and zoning do exist.
2. Economic Benefits to the City
Residential Multi-family1-5
Residential Single Family 6-10
Commercial/Retail 11-15
Mixed Uses/Offices 16.20
i
{
a,
a
k
a
EXHIBIT I (cont'd)
3. 8alanced Growth
South and Southeast 0-4
Northeast
East 5-9
Northwest 10-14
West 15-18
19-20
4. Compact Growth
Development less than:
200 feet away from existing utility lines 20
201-400 feet away from existing utility lines 15
401.600 feet away from existing utility lines 10
601-1000 feet away from existing utility lines 04
1000-2000 feet away from existing utility lines 1
over 2000 feet away from existing utility lines 0
5. Health, Safety 3 Environmental Considerations
Related Circumstances: (scores range from 1-20 depending upon
circumstances)
6. Engineer1 Concerns
Regulatory requirements 0-10
Provides off-site service to existing development 0-5
C Provides off-site service to undeveloped areas 0-5
Improves system performance 0-5
i
7. Demand divided _by Cost Ratio (Use demand points derived by
ca ca a ohs
a. Water Demand:
(1) Residential Uses
Demand - 165 GPCD x HHS x I Units x 365 d/y
where GPCO gallons per capita per day
or also called gallons per person per day
HHS - Household size (SF-207 MF-I.7)
d/y - days per year
(2) Non-Residential Uses
Demand ■ GPCO x # persons x 365 d/y based on the type of
establishment. The following list has been adopted from
the Texas Department of Health:
~ I
i
If
I
ti
EXHIBIT I (cont'd)
Type of Establishment Gallons per Capita per Oay (GPCO)
Restaurants..... 18
Schools w/o cafeterias, gym or showers.... 18
Schools w/cafeterias, no gym or showers... 24
Schools w/cafeterias, gym and showers..,.. 30
Office Buildings 18
Hospitals...... 240
Institutions (other than hospitals)....... 120
Factories (g/p/shift, exclusive of 24
industrial wastes)
Parks w/o bathhouses 6
Swimming pools b bathhouses 12
Country Clubs (per resident member)....... 120
Drive-In theatres (per car space).......,. 6
Movie Theatres (per auditorium seat)...... 6
Airports (per passenger) 6
Laundries-Self Service (gals/wash/customer) 60
j Stores (total per day per washroom)....... 480
Service stations (per vehicle served)..... 12
f b. Wastewater Flows:
(I) Residential Uses
Flow • 132 GPCD x HHS x ► of Units x 365 d/y
where GPCD ■ gallons per capita per day
or also called gallons per pperson per day
HHS . Household size (SFt2.7 MF-1.7)
d/y ■ days per year
(2) Non-Residential Uses
Flows • GPCD x i persons x 365 d/y based on the type of
establishment. The following list has been adopted from
the Texas Department of Health;
i
Type of Establishment Gallons per Capita per Day -(GPCD)
Restaurants (per meal) 6
Schools w/cafeterias, no showers.,....,,,, 1s
Schools w/cafeterias and showers..,....,., 20
Recreational Parks, overnight user,,,,,,,, 30
Recreational Parks, day user 6
Office Buildings/Factories 20
y Motels 60
Hospital (per bed) 200
Nursing Home (per bed) 100
8. Cost
These costs are for costs of water and/or sanitary sewer IInes
only to tie in to closest applicable city service lines and
running across one side of subject development.
1
i I
EXHIBIT I (cont'd)
g. Subtotal Points (add Columns 1-7)
10. Priorities Before Pro Rata Survey
Based on points only, give first priority to highest points,
second priority to next highest points, etc.
11. Priorities After Pro Rata Survev
When list of development plan candidates water and sanitary
sewer lines are prioritized before pro rata survey, take those
projects totaling numbers of dollars available and survey
orocons rucneon, foGivel onegn(I )s pointayforroeachtaowner w111in1 g to
sign a pro rata payment contract. Re-total points and re-assign
priorities.
i
TOTAL POINTS
Re-assign priorities by new summation of points.
i
I
V
i
6325U:5-8
l
EXHIBIT II
Industrial Development Infrastructure
Assistance Study
Financial analysis of industrial prospects for infrastructure
investment.
a. Formula
NET CASH FLOW BENEFITS - INFRASTRUCTURE AND/OR
CAPACITY RELATED COSTS
Where the computation of BENEFITS is determined as follows:
Total Payroll
i
o Less commuters income
j o less all non-local taxes
o Plus tax revenue from Plant
o Plus net revenue for Electric, Water and Sanitary Sewer
o Times multiplier
I Equals ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL BENEFITS
I 1
b. Variable
i
o Number of employees
o Value of plant
1 0 local property tax rate
o Income multiplier
o Individual taxes
co Ass'Im tp ion
Additional costs to serve demands of citizens for public
services are less than or equal to tax revenue received
4 from these individuals,
I
632SU:4
1
C
}
k
r
EXHIBIT I I I
Criteria for Ranking Economic Development
Utility Lines
Introduction
This ranking system has been designed to prioritize the list of
Industrial Development Plan candidates for the utility Capital
Improvement Plan's designated "Development Plan Water and Sewer
Lines". It is recognized that the development potentials considered
by this ranking system may change from year to year as physical
developments progress in specific areas. It shall be necessary,
therefore, to review the ranking of projects on an annual basis to
take into consideration changing circumstances.
1. Development Potential in the Short Term Points
Access by improved thoroughfare 1-6*
No announcements
Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare 7-13**
Announcements
Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare 14-20***
Announcements
Zoning
Plats
*Developer has not made an announcement for developing his
property and has not platted for development, Thoroughfare and
zoning, however, do exist.
**Developer has announced to the City Staff his intention to
develop and to follow up with platting. Thoroughfare and zoning,
however, do exist.
i
***Developer has announced and platted his development to the
City Staff; thoroughfare and zoning do exist.
2. Size of Industrial Area to be Developed Points
More than 300 Acres 20
200 - 300 Acres i5
100 - 200 Acres 10
less than 104 Acres 5
f~
I
r
. ~i
r~
S I
}
3. Balanced Growth Points
South and Southeast 0-4
Northeast 5-9
East 10-14
Northwest 15-18
West 1g-Y0
4. Industrial Site Owner Commitment
a. rime Frame for Development
less than i year 10
2 to 5 years 5
More than 5 years 0
b. Ar.tivity
Ownership of property 10
Marketing of property 2-6
C. Investment of Infrastructure 5-10
5. Compact Growth
Development less than:
200 reet away from existing utility lines 20
201-400 feet away from existing utility lines 15
401.600 feet away from existing utility lines 10
601-1000 feet a.iay from existing utility lines 04
1000-2000 feet away from existing utility lines 1
over 2000 feet away from existing utility lines 0
6, Health, Safety & Equipment Consideration
Related Considerations: (Scores range from 1-20 depending upon
circumstances such as pollutant versus clean non-pollutant
industry, light versus heavy industry, healthy versus unhealthy
work environment, etc.)
1. Engineering Concerns
Regulatory requirements 0.10
Provides off-site service to existing development 0.5
Provides off-site service to undeveloped areas 0-5
Improves system performance 0-5
i
I ~
S
3. '
ri
I
i
g
8. Demand Divided b Cost Ratio (Use demand points derived by
c- a at ions
a. Water Demand:
Demand ■ GPCD x # employees x 365 d/y based on the type of
industry. Generally this will be 25 GPCD for a
non-pollutant industry. The GPCD should, however, be
verified from each industry.
b, Wastewater Flows:
Flows - GPCD x # employees x 365 d/y based on the type of
industry. Generally this will be 22 GPCD for a
non-pollutant industry. The GPCD should, however, be
verified from each industry.
9. Cost
These costs are for costs of water and/or sanitary sewer lines
only to tie in to closest applicable city service lines and j
running across one side of subject development,
10, Subtotal Points (Add Columns 1-1)
11. Priorities before Pro Rat,A Survey
Based on points only, give first priority to highest points,
second priority to next highest points, etc.
12. Priorities after Pro Rata Survey
I
When list of development plan industrial candidates water and
sanitary sewer lines are prioritized before pro rata survey,
take those projects totaling numbers of dollars available and
survey property owners for willingness to pay pro rata upon
completion of construction. Give one 0 ) point for each owner
willing to sign a pro rata payment contract. Re-total points
and re-assign priorities.
TOTAL POINTS
Re-assign priorities by new summation of points.
R ~
i
i
6325U:10-12
1
I
I
tA
t
:j
EXHIBIT IV
Flow Chart Approval Process for
Development Plan Water and Sewer Lines I
I
IAA
ICIP Protects Including Development I
(Plan Lines for 1
I 1. Residential/Commercial Sites I
I 2. Industrial Sites 1
I 3. Industrial Development Infra-1
I- structure Assistance Program I
I UTIt
j ISTAFF to Review Residential/Commercial I
land Industrial Site Candidates and I
lprioritize according to ranking 1
Icriteria.
I ~
I of
IPAZ in context of CIP document. I
I i
I ~
IP Z R I N and Recommend Lines t"6_1
(City Council in context of CIA
Idocument.
I ~
[CITY eve opmen (
(Plan Lines for res/com sites and industrial I
Isite alternatives plus the guidelines for I
lindustrial development infrastructure assts- I
Itance Program alternatives. I
I I 1
IOUTa'BTX I-LACK YEAR: Fun as made-1 IUMBE - a I
lavailable for Industrial Dev. I Itakes action to construct I
Ilnfrastructure Assist. Program I )residential /commercial I
(Funds to be held for 6 months onl (development plan lines. I
lactual candidates.
I
I tunas nave no een use I
Iby Industrial Dev. Infrastructure 1 j
(Assist. Program alternative funds, 1
Imay be redirected to industrial site I i
[candidate lines or res/com development)
(plan lines after being brought to PUB I
land PAZ for recommendation on
lailocation. PUB and PAZ then makes I
j Irecommendation to City CouncilI
b325U:13
i
i
r
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
November 16, 1988
11. CONSIDER INFORMATION FINAL APPROVAL AND REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT
LaForte made a motion to approve the concept and methodology of
this policy as it is presented. Second by Chew. LaForte
questioned whether another meeting with the PAZ was necessary in
January. Nelson indicated he would like the Board's guidance on
this. Nelson explained we do not have a list of lines selected
for this process, and we have never had a public hearing on this
yet.
Chew indicated he was under the impression that we had had a
joint meeting with the PAZ. Nelson explained we did have for
the purpose of reviewing the Five Year Capital Improvement
Plan. However the proposed meeting is to take input from
industrial /commercial people and citizens. We will also discuss
and outline to the public what criteria we will use to give
money to the candidate lines. This will be done at the first
meeting in February, The Board indicated their concurrenc-i with
this procedure.
Laney called for a vote. All ayes, no nays, motion carried.
l
6325U:20
e
r
Joint P$Z and PUB
February 8, 1989 DRAk
Page 1
3 approved and started. He added that though there are
four major projects listed, it actually is to create
one major project.
r. Ham reported that one year ago, when the Denton
Development Plan was near finalization, one of the
provisions was to have the Utilities Department set
aside funds, if available, to assist -~oina
industrial, residential, and commercial develo,m~-.,,
in the City of Denton. He stated that the Public
Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion agreed with the concept.
Mr. Ham continued that the Public Utilities Board asked
the Water/Waste Water Department to set aside s500,000
each year in the CIP under the item Development Plan -
Water and Sewer Lines. Mr. Ham stated that the
$500,000 will be equally split between both water and
sewer lines.
Mr. Ham explained that on October 1st each year,
$400,000 of the $500,000 would be set aside for six
months until April Ist, to be used for any industrial
prospects or "hot" prospects that would come into
Denton for the purpose to develop. These prospects
would be presented to the Public Utilities Board,
Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council to
determine if these funds should be used to develop
water and sewer lines for the property for industrial
development. If the $400,000 is not encumbered by
April let, the unspent monies would be added to the
$100,000 to be set aside for residential or commercial
candidate lines. These monies would be used for the
highest ranking candidate lines whether they are
industrial, residential, or commercial. The remaining
$500,000, original total, would continue on until
September 30th or the end of the fiscal year. At that
time, the Director of Finance would insure that any
monies encumbered for specific candidate lines, would
be carried forward to the next fiscal year. Mr. Ham
stated that any monies that are not committed to
specific projects would be dropped off at the end of
the fiscal year. As of October of the next fiscal
year, another $500,000 would be added to the CIP for
+ consideration and the process would start all over.
Mr. Ham explained Exhibits I, II, and III in the
Commissioners back up regarding to the ranking system
and how it is used. Mr. Ham stated that Exhibit I
I
I
I
r
Joint yZ and PUB DRAFT
February 8, 1989
Page 14
would be used for residential and commercial candi-
date lines. Exhibit III would be used for industrial
candidate lines. Exhibit II is the economic model,
designed by city staff and the Chamber of Commerce,
to evaluate the benefits that an interested industrial
or "hot" prospect would give to the City of Denton.
These benefits would include items such as the net cash
flow, the size of the building, and the amount of job
openings that would be available for Denton residents.
Mr. Ham concluded with the Development Plan Guidelines
portion and proceeded with the list for residential and
commercial candidate lines.
Mr. Ham stated that the list included the location of
the candidate lines, the size of the line, and the cost
to install the water and/or sewer lines. Mr. Ham noted
that on the candidate water lines, the total was
$10,395,200 and for sewer the total was $6,187,597. He
said that the totals are for all the properties in the
city limits that are presently not receiving city water
j and/or sewer service.
Ms. Brock asked Mr. Ham what area would involve the
Gamble's property. Mr. Ham stated that it would
include area A-5 that involved:
A-5 3,200' of 16" WL on west side of Bonnie
Brae from Hwy 380 to Windsor and Payne Dr.
to serve residences and upper pressure plane.
Ms, Gamble stated that she felt area A-3 would include
their area. A-3 included: ii
'
A-3 3,200' of 12"WL along east aide of Bonnie 1
Brae from Hwy 380 to Windsor and Payne Dr.
and
for lower pressure plane,
Mr. Ham stated that both lines would be needed to serve
both the upper and lower pressure planes though the
Gamble's could tie onto either line.
Mr. Thompson asked if the list of candidate lines were
for gust the residents that were requesting service.
Mr. Ham stated that the list included all areas in the
city limits that did not have water and/or sewer
service at this time.
ICE I
1
I '
k I
C
`r .
f
{
Joint Pb2 and PUB
February 8, 1989
Page 15 DRAF c
I
Mr. Ham addressed the list of industrial candidate
lines and stated that staff did not put a cost figure
on the listing but he did have an estimate if the
Commission wanted to know it. He said there would be
approximately $525,000 for water lines and $230,000 for
sewer lines with a total of $755,000 for the industrial
candidate lines. He stated that this was not for "hot"
prospects but for f ive sites that the Chamber of
Commerce and staff had identified as potential
industrial sites.
Mr. Ham explained the flow charts both in the
Commissioners backup and on the transparency. After
a slight misunderstanding of the flow chart from
Mr. La Forte, the meeting continued.
Mr. Ham stated that he would like to recommend that
the Commission receive and reconfirm tha use of the
Development Plan Guidelines, receive end consider the
public's input, and receive the list from staff
regarding residential, commercial, and industrial
candidates for water and sewer lines with staff being
allowed to continue with the ranking of all the lines.
Mr. Ham concluded that the number of candidate lines
and their associated construction costs far exceed the
available $500,000 per year.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked how the candidate lines for
Exhibit I and III are ranked. Mr. Ham said by points.
He added that the residential and commercial lines are
ranked differently than the industrial lines.
Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the
guidelines, accept the requests that were made by the
public for further consideration, and approve staff's
candidate list as presented. Seconded by Mr. Kamman
and unanimously carried (5-0).
Joint meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
R~
E
i
I
}
i
I
II
t
If ~4
k
I
I
F
P
4
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8307
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: Match 1, 1989
SUBJECT: Leasing Price4 at the Airport
At a previous Council meeting, several members asked for
information on our lease rates at the Airport. I have enclosed
a survey of sixteen airports in the Metroplex area. These
airports include major and minor ones as well as public and
private fields. There is also some information on tie down ;
fees and hanger fees.
1
1 have also included a copy of a couple of sheets from the
Airport Master Plan. One is a map of the Airport showing the
suggested land classification at the Airport that was done by
Charles Willis. The second page suggests prices that should be
charged for those pieces of land. We have e4lso asked for
information from several other fields, and they haven't
responded at this date. Of those surveyed, we compare quite
well.
One of the other questions the council had was the
classifications on the rent schedule, particularly, what Some
and Minor improvements meant. The Airport Board discussed this
item at their February meeting and appointed a subcommittee to
give some recommendations to the Council. That subcommittee
met earlier this week and is suggesting the following. There
are five kinds of improvements that could be made at the
Airport roads, water, sewer, taxiways, and electricity. The
category labelled 'none' would obviously mean none of the
j above. The 'some' category is recommended to be any one of
these improvements. The 'minor' category is recommended to be
any two of these improvements, and the 'major' category is
recommended to be at least three or more of these
improvements. The subcommittee also reviewed the prices that
were recommended. In view of the survey, they suggested
leaving the land classes as is on the Airport.
j
1
j
f
Lloyd V. Harrell
March 1. 1989
Page 2
We also did some calculation and projections on the existing
lease revenue and an assessment of the ultimate revenue from
the leases. As you can see. the existing land leased at this
time will total revenues of approximately 551,000/year. That
will increase over the years simply because several of the
leases are phased leases in which more land is leased at
" defined intervals. Also, there could be increases since most
of the leases have clauses in them that are tied to the CPI at
certain intervals.
We have also included a table that shovs an estimate of what
our revenue would be at such time as the Airport is leased out
totally. Obviously, we do not see this happening very soon,
but we do think that it will happen within the next fifteen or
twenty years at the most.
Finally, we have included a tabulation of the questionnaires
that were distributed by AirDenton. These questionnaires are
f for the period from the beginning of September to the middle of
November. We asked AirDenton to do them because they see more
of the passengers than we do as they either plane or deplane.
Over that period, parties representing 68 people answered our
questionnaire and they indicated that they paid a total of
l $732,900 in Denton. Obviously, a major portion of that was
spent by one individual party. We suspect that that party
` bought several trucks at Peterbilt although we have no way of
knowing that. I would also point out that this is not a
E complete and total list, but rather people that did agree to
fill out the questionnaire as they came through the Airport.
If you or the Council has any further questions, we would be
happy and answer them at your pleasure.
Rick Svehla
Deputy City Manager
63M
44
4463M
Attachments
k
I `
I
i
AIRPORT DATA SURVEY
~I None/Sons/Mi no[/Mayo[
Name of Airport General Informatlun Tie-Down Pees Hangar Pees Improvements
Addison Airport .35E per sq. foot with no roads See Attachment A See Attachment A
Dallas, 79 .65E per sq. foot with roads
I I
Alliance Airport 16.5E per sq. footr ■in. of Hone None
Port worth, TA $21,750.00 Annually
Arlington Airport No Tie-Downs Closed T-Hangar 1115.00 I
Arlington, Ti .10 to .13/.16/.2D/.3D
i
ilourland Field No Land for Lease 630.Oo Patio Hangars ! 55.00 None
Port Worth, TA open T-Hangare ! 99-150.00
l
Dallas Hart% No Land for Least $30.00 open T-Hangare ! 70-100.00 None
Dallas, Ti Closed T-Hangars $125.00
Goode Airport No Land for Lease !30.00 Open T-Hanga[e ! 70.00 None
Koller, TX Closed 7-Hangars ! 75-65.00
Grand Prairie NpnICIPal !10.00 Old T-Hangars $125.00 .10 .19
Grand Prairie, TA New T-Nangara 8150.00
Patio Hangars ! 95.00
micks Field No Land for Luse 835.00 Closed T-Hangars 1165.00 None
Port Worth, TA
Lancaster Airport Leeasse is responsible for $30.00 small T-Hangars 6300.00 .06 no improvements
LanCA/tar, TX any improvements Medium T-Hangars !120.00
Large T-Hangars !160.00
h
1 1613k/i
i
~ I
1
C~ ~ M
a
I
Ii
1
AIRPORT DATA SURVEY
Name of Airoort General Information Tie-Down Fees None/Some/Minor/Major
Nan ar fee! Ii roveeent-s 1
Luck Yield No Land for Lease 1
III fort Worth, TA ;40,00 Patto Rangara { 65-75,00 None/None/hone/None '
Closed T-Rangers =175,00
111 McKinney Airport total Airport IN leased at 17E Mona
I McKinney, TA None
It per aq, loot per year for None
103/5,663 square feet
Meacham Airport
?QIt Wort TA S 64.00 .00 per night single None 8.B!/--•/---/16.6!
1
per night twin
Mesquite Airport
$35.00
Mesquite, to Closed T-Hangar ;130.00 ,06
Closed T-Hangat
for Twin Engine 417S.OU
Slinks Airport No Land for Lease ;75.00
fort North, TA Community Shed ; 75.00
Small t-Nengars ;170,00 Rene
Large T-Hangars 1165.00
New T-Hangars 4115-750.00
Terrell Airport No Land for Least (75.00
Terrell, TA Closed T-Hangars ;115.00 None
1
1671k/7
f(
I!
h
i
}I
e
AIRPORT DATA SURVEY
ATTACHMENT A
ADDISON AIRPORT
TIE-DOWN IEES III
Grua area with no featrooms of tole Phones 145.00
1
Paved aru with no testrooms or telephones 660.00
Paved area with day access to telephones and restrooms 665.00
Paved area with 21-hour access to telephones and restrooms 175.00
J~ HANGAR UES 1
Shall T-HARgsra 1115.00
Open T-Hangar 1170.00
Patio Hangar $160.00
Large T-Hangar 6195.00
Small Twin $250.00
Large Twin - 60' 1350.00
$36D.00
6195.00
Executive II $350.00
Executive 111 $695.00
1 III Jet Eangars
11 60 E 60 $1,000.00
60 E 60 11,200.00
to x 10 $1,500.00
eo E 99 $2,DOO.00
i
1
1
I
1623k/6
104
AIRPORT DATA SURVEY
DENTUN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
None/Some/limo:/Na~or
Name of Airport General Information Ti*-Down Fees Hangar Fees Inuro~•`ents
Denton, TX South Ramp 130.00 Open T-Hangers f 50-70.00 See Attachrent I 1
North Ramp :60.00
Denton 130-50.00 Closed T-Hangars $ 95.00
~ :150.00
i Overnight single 1 3.00
Overnight Twin 1 5.00
Airport ;round Lease Guideline:
improvements Defined
{
Roads, Taxiways, llectrlclty, Water, Sewer
None - No roads, ao waters no taslwPr no sewer no GlOctrlcity
Some - Any one improvement
minor r Any two improvements
Mayor - Any three improvements or all improvements as defined
GROUND LIASI RATIS
LAND
CLASS "I IOMI MINOR MAJOR
I MIA N/A N/A N/A
11 .10 .12 .16 .20
111 .09 .10 .12 .li
/ IV .05 .01 .10 .16
4
1623x/3
I
•~4
r
i
i
ATIAi',hMCb:
i
4
IMY 9l ,CA,~1
2 we +o `I~Ietl '
'•r IwR M Nr
IIrwY NR. M. •Yfu •N.u.ubuuu u. uCo .fl, u. . ~.G4' iYL1114i0
i•
4v;9410
pas wa!!jamd~- ~ + ~
...........I -
u...~Mw wr I w nr~. ~ ~ w W Mr
LL u w.
40
31~ .0
~ AM WIll.lt IP.11Y. I11111r
~I d...rto rr a 1 2 .IMI NIr11 -
~ Qrnrro l.wr
va+ra .won rvwN 2 • ~ ~ ~ wr•a.~
f1 !4
I Ago ()nf LAND USE and
.•+.r •M1 •'•o TERmr4AL AREA PLAN
FIGURE 8.2 - WO AREA CLASSWATICN D""ON hl"VAI A l"f
CR%kES.AiS & ASS"rS IC
I
1
LAND LEASED
Location Name Opt./Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Price Per Yr. Value
North end of Airport Mahon 26,881.03 x .080 = S 2,150.40
North end of Airport 1st Financial 21,344.40 x .075654 1,614.00
North end of Airport Brown 73,856.47 x .06830 = 502.00
North end of Airport Fox-51 170,583.34 .07fi - 20609.00
North end of Airport Fox-51 34,071.00
-1 every two years
North end of Airport Fox-51 Fuel Fees 1,000.00
i
South end of Airport Air Denton 392,000,00 x .0244,E s 9,600.00
South end of Airport Air Denton Fuel Fees 16,000.00
and Hangar Fees
I' South end of Airport Port-A-Part First year .070 20064.00 1
South end of Airport Port-A-Port 336,959.00 S 230587.00 Total after eight years
Rate increased every
two years.
Farm Lease 3,204.00
I Airport Dally Tie Down 1,100.00 1
City Hangar Fee and Tie Down 60500.00
Special Events _ 400.00
1
Total $51,265.30
1
l I
I
1
2463]
1
J
LAND AVAILABLE FOR LEASE
Location Square Footage Value
Nest side of Airport (136 acres) 5,945,940.00 x 120 • $713,512.80
North end of Airport 31,320.00 x 80 • 2,505.60
h North end of Airport 46,522.00 x 80 • 3,721.76
` North end of Airport 12,240.00 x 8¢ • 979,40
I
Southeast side of Airport 136,000.00 x 200 • 27,200.00
Southeast side of Airport 129,600.00 x 200 • 25,920.00
Southeast side of Airport 129,600.00 x 200 a 25,920.00
Southeast side of Airport 436,917.75 x 200 • .7,383.55
Southeast side of Airport 91,000.00 x 80 • 70280.00
4 Southeast side of Airport 26,400.00 x 140 ■ 3,696.00
Southeast side of Airport 34,876.00 x 140 a 4,882.64
Southeast side of Airport 26,400.00 x 140 • 3,696.00
j Southeast side of Airport 732,735.00 x 100 a 73,273.50
E Southeast side of Airport 424,370.71 x 120 ■ 500924.49
Center of Airport (7 acres) 3040920.00 x 200 - 608984.00
Center of Airport (10 acres) 470,000.00 x 200 m94,000.00
i
Grand Total $1,185,819.54
i
2463]
r
r
i
r
F ,
I`
DENTON AIRPORT SURVEY
I 09/02/88-11/18/88 (19 Days)
I~
Average
Average Reported
Average Nights In Denton Expenditures j of Surveys
Part Size Trip purpose
2 $133.00 21
3,2 Business or Pleasure
i One group Most people 1
Spent did not wish
$730,190.00 to fill out
survey.
I
I
i
i
i I
i f
j 1
1
I i
I
2466J/1
V
I
I
I
i
I~1
I
7
1
i
I
`R
O~
CITY OF.DENTON RCITY Y 7 CO198CIL MINUTES
The City Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 P.M. In
the Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayer BPro oyd, Gorton and council Members Alexander,
the City in
ASSENT: Mayor Washington pegarding the Green Belt.
Wa
1. The council considered the Human Resources Committee
funding criteria.
Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator, presented the
changes in the funding criteria and stated that the Committee
would like to make a name change to the Human Services
Committee.
kk Council Member Ayer questioned the last sentence in the
k priority criteria regarding the listing of services in such
detail.
After discussion,
entence from consensus the paragraph. was to delete that
particular s
Council Member McAdams suggested deleting the listing of target
populations from the priority criteria.
After discussion, consensus of the Council was to delete number
three from the listing of priority criteria.
criteria which would i notgrequire eadtIndependent audits capacity
Consensus of the council was
independent audit would be requirede uthe nless wording by tthe
council.
2. The Council considered the Community Development Block
Grant Committee funding criteria.
Connie Wells, Chair-Community Development Block Grant
were committee, re dy t reviewed answer any qustins stated the Council had, and Ms.
Ross
!J~ Council Member McAdams was concerned with the wording of the
project priority ranking which used "activities" in connection
with several projects.
f V
4 City of Denton City Council Minutes
Feoruary 7, 1984
Page 2
wells replied that that was the wording from the federal
regulations.
McAdams stated that the wanted to be sure and .ise the funds for 1J
j tangible projects not for paying salaries, etc.
Council Member Alexander su
`see visible results" in the narrativenofuthegcritedria. such as
Consensus of the Council was to proceed.
3. The Council considered plans for expansion of the +
Senior Center.
' Steve Brinkman, Director of Packs, introduced Norman Hatfield,
f architect for the expansion of the Senior Center. Mr. Hatfield
was involved in the original design of the Senior Center, North
Lakes and Denia Recreation Centers.
Hatfield reviewed the
j plans for construction with the Council.
He stated that the expansion, when completed, would look as
though the entire building had been done at one time. The
j development plan would not interrupt activities at the Center
and would not leave the senior citizens without a place to meet.
i
Lloyd Harrell, city Manager, stated that the expansion included
j a Domino Room which would house 15 tables, an amount larger
than current needs unless the Council indicated to the contrary. J
i
4. The Council considered the Park Donation Policy.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented background information
concerning the park donation policy. He stated that developers
had requested that before the City made a mandatory park
dedication policy, they be allowed to work for voluntary
standards. The developers felt that they would get sufficient
park land through donations rather than the necessity of a
mandatory policy. The Park and Recreation Board and the
Planning and Zoning Commission had been working together to
develop the voluntary standards. Those standards would be put
in resolution form and developers would be encouraged to follow
those standards.
` Carl Anderson, Chair-Park and Recreation Board, stated that the
f Board felt that the developers would police themselves and that
the standards were worth taking a twelve month look at for
compliance.
I
r~
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page 3
Council Member Alexander stated that he wanted flexibility
which allowed developers to work with Planning and Parks for
placement of the donated land so that the park land would not j
be placed somewhere unusaole but rather placed where it 11
belonged.
Council discussed aspects of the draft including requiring the
developers to develop the infrastructure for the packs, the
substitutions of smaller amounts of land in exchange for
development of the park and the necessity to be aware that the
land did not revert back to the developer without being
developed.
5. The Council considered the proposed regulations
governing street closings.
Roger Nelson, Administrative Assistant, reviewed the current
ordinance which did not have any concrete guidelines regardir,,
street closings. He presented the proposed regulations which
included that all closing had to be approved by Council,
signatures of all residents/occupants of the block to be closed
must be obtained, the event should terminate in enough time for
clean up to occur before the street wae to be reopened,
evaluation of effect of street closing on emergency services
from the Police Chief and Fire Chief be required, a deposit of
$25 for residential barricades, additional requirements for
non-residential closings to include restroom facilities, the I
need for a traffic control officer, a set up and take down fee
for barricades, a clean up deposit and an administrative fee.
Council discussion centered on types of administrative fees,
barricade fees, the difference between commercial and
residential closings, the differences in commercial closings, f
non-profit versus profit organizations requesting the closings,
allowing citizens to put up and take down the barricades and
the proper time period for requesting the closing.
Consensus of the Council was to include the item on another
work session with comparisons of other cities having auch an
ordinance in place.
6, The Council considered a report on the 1989-1994
Capital Improvements Program.
This item was not considered during the work session.
7. Tne Council did not meet in Executive Session during
the Work Session.
I
I
j
1
r
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page 4
The Council convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in 1
the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Alexander.
Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and McAdams.
ABSENT: Mayor Stephens - representing the City in
Washington regarding the Green Belt.
1. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the i
work sessions of January 3 and 5, and the regular meetings of
January 10 and 17, 1989.
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the minutes.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. The Council received a citizen's report from Mr. Bob ,
i Woodin regarding the concept for a Farmer's Market in Denton.
Mr. John Cooper, County Extension Agent, stated that he would
speak for Mr. Woodin, who was unable to attend the meeting. He
stated that the area farmers had been surveyed and consensus
was favorable for such a market. He had spoken with all but +
one County Commissioner and they were all in favor of the 4
market. The Chamber of Commerce was taking the lead in
facilitating a market. Under the direction of Bob Woodin,
Chairman-Convention and Visitors Bureau Advisory Board to the ~
Bureau, it was decided that they would act as a sponsor for I
applying for grants to fund a market for Denton. It was
intended to present at the meeting, a proposal for submission
the the Texas Department of Agricultural Diversification Board
under the grants program. However, efforts had been stalled in
securing a particular piece of property to act as a matching
portion to the grant. At this point in time, it was requested
_ that they be allowed to return at a later date when a piece of
property had been locate,].
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that with Council's
permission, it would be helpful to have a staff person work
with Mr. Cooper and Mr. Woodin in developing the concept of the
Farmer's Market.
3. The Council considered a report from the 191 Committee
and take any appropriate action.
Jack Miller, Chair-191 Committee, stated that the Committee was
established after the 1986 bond election which was passed by
the voters, to review during the 5 year span of that program,
the spending of the money to make sure that it was done for
those things that the voters approved. The Committee met
{ quarterly and at the last meeting of January 25, 1989, they
1
i
r~
S
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
page 5
h reviewed the projects and staff recommendations. The
Committee's cnarge was not to determine when projects were done 1
or how they were done, but to mak.1 sure the funds were spent as
the voters had approved. Tnere were three items he wanted to
review with the Council. (1) Library expansion - Council had
requested tnat the '91 Committee review the proposed expansion
of the library as recommended by the Library Board. It was the
Conmittee's opinion after reviewing the material from the bond
election, that the courses of action the Board was considering
with what the voters nad approved. The I
- was in keeping
Committee recommended that the Council consider the Board's
C i proposals. (2) The city had some money available as a result
of the State changing its requirement for funding from the City
for certain state highway projects. The
I` approximately $5 million. There were p. Jects within the bond
issue that had been approved by the voters that did not really
have funding available and the Committee felt it would be a
wise use of the money available to do some of those projects.
Those projects would include building sidewalks for those
i
streets that were being improved, rebuilt$ repaved within the
bond issue projectsr buying right-of-way required by the State
for state projectsr upgrading certain traffic signals within ,
the City including upgrading of the signals and computerization
of the signals on the Square including the Locust - Elm - )
McKinney interbectionsi and allocating funds for beautification
as projects were developed. j
4. Public Hearings
A. The council held a public hearing and considered
adoption of an ordinance amending Article 17tof sippendix B e
Zoning, of the code of ordinances relating
planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval). J
I~
The Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearing.
'I Sam Marino, Beautification Task Force, endorsed the ordinance.
He asked the Council to approve the passage.
F Euline Brock, chair-Planning and Zoning Commission, stated that
' the Commission had recommended approval on January 251 1989 by
j a vote of 7-0. There had been much cooperation among everal
different bodies including the Planning and Zoning Commission,
the Beautification Task Force, and tie Governmental Relations
committee from the Chamber of Commerce. She urged the Council
to approve the ordinance. 1
Bill Claiborne, Beautification Task Force, spoke in favor. He
stated that the first impression that was given to outsiders
comin in on impressions. He the
felt outhatCetheres was an overaoundance lasting one of the mos t portable signs. The proposed ordinance would tighten up
the
loop holes in the current ordinance. i
I
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page b
Bonnie Taylor, Beautification Task Force, expressed her desire
for Council for approval of the ordinance.
Mable Devereaux., Beautification Task Force, asked the Council
to approve the ordinance.
Mitchell Turner, Appendix A Task Force, stated that this was a
step in the right direction and was in favor of passage.
Jack Miller, Governmental Relations Committee-Chamber of
Commerce, recommended approval of the ordinance.
John Cooper, Beautification Task ForcS, stated that the
proposed ordinance would be an improvement in all respects of
the current ordinance.
Jeannie Morrison, Chair-Beautification Task Force, urged the
Council to pass the ordinance.
Mike Cochran, Beautification Task Force, spoke in favor and
that in the long run, it would be very good for the clty.
{
James Singleton, Pastor-Calvary Baptist Church, spoke in
opposition. He felt that the ordinance would infringe on
people's rights. Small businesses and small churches would be
hurt with this ordinance. Churches should have the right to
put out portable signs for a short period of time announcing a
special event. the ordinance could limit the number of days,
the number of times per year.
Council Member Boyd asked if stake signs could not sised instead
of portable signs for the type of announcement Singleton was
suggesting.
Singleton replied that often the stake signs looked worse than
the portable signs and were not as durable.
Lee Donaldson, Pastor of the Vinyard Christian Fellowship,
stated that the sign ordinance would hamper advertising for
growth of the church and cut businesses from growth until they
could afford permanent signs.
i Ken Willingham, Metro Portable signs, felt that portable sign
advertising was better than advertising in the newspaper. He
was opposed to the passage of the ordinance.
Slick Smith, 3-D Sign Co. of Denton, stated that he suffered
the blunt of the self-owned portable signs because those owners
did not take as good of care as he did with his signs. He waa
opposed to the ordinancA.
I
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page 7
He felt that the City was dictating to small businesses where
they could and could not advertise. He felt an amendment for
churches ohoutd be incorporated.
The Mayor Pro Tom closed the public hearing. !
Council thanked all those who provided input at the public I
hearing and thanked -La members of the various committee who
worked on the development of the ordinance.
The fallowing ordinance was considered;
NO. 89-017
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING
ARTICLE 17 OF APPENDIX B - ZONING OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES RELATING TO SIGNS; PROHIBITING PORTABLE AND
INFLATABLE SIGNS; AMENDING THE SIZE, HEIGHT, AND
SPACING REGULATIONS FOR GROUND SIGNS; AMENDING THE
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ILLUMINATED SIGNS; PROVIDING
FOR THE LICENSING OF SIGN CONTRACTORS; PROVIDING FOR
PERMITS FOR WIND DEVICE SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR THE
REMOVAL OF ABANDONED SIGNS: PROVIDING FOR REGULATIONS
FOR STAKE SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR THE REGISTRATION OF
NONCONFORMING PORTABLE SIGNS: PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY
IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF: PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE: AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Boyd seconded to adopt the ordinance. on +
colt vote, McAdams "aye," Aloxand,er "aye," Gorton llaye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd $$aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
~ B. The Council held a public hearing on the proposed
annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of certain property
located along the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. (A-58).
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoko in opposition.
The Mayor Pro Tern closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this was the first
public hearing dealing with this annexation. Staff was working
with Sam Martino and the area residents regarding a 100,
voluntary annexation. It was hoped that all the necessary
documents would be ready by the time of institution. The next
public hearing would be o-i February 21, 1989.
1
t
~ r
city of Denton city council minutes
February 71 1989
Page 8
5. Consent Agenda
Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked that item 5,A,1. be removed for
special consideration.
McAdams motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the Consent
Agenda with tre exception of item Motion carried
unanimously.
A. Bids and Purchase Ordersi
2. Bid 09927 - Track Loader/Motor
i
3. Bid 09929 - witer Meters
4. Bid 0 9931 - Fiberglass Streetlight Poles
5. Bid 09932 Fire Department Uniforms
61 Bid 09934 - Line Puller Tensioner
7. Bid 09935 - Bunker Pants and Coats
8. Bid 09938 - Concrete Mixer Truck
9. Bid 09939 - Streetlights
10. Bid 09921 - ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project
11. Bid 09922 - Vertical Turbine Pump and Motor
12. P.O. 088793 - •3 6 S Equipment Service, Inc.
- $12,746.89
13. P.O. 088387 - J 6 5 Equipment Service, Inc.
$12,269.30
B. Tax Refunds
1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Title
USA/First Union 14tg. Corp. - $929.00
2. Consider approval of a tax refund for Pant
W. Noreen/Ticor Realty Tax Services - $693.61
The Council considered S.A.I.
Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked wt:y the low bid was not being
it accepted. She had spoken with the company who made the low
old, which was not accepted. They had repeatedly bid in Denton
4
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page 9
or wanted to bid in Denton and had asked Mr, Shaw and/or others
they spoke with how to get their foot in the door in Denton, l
Mr. Shaw had told them to be the :ow bidder. The owner stated
that this time they were the low bidder and still were not I
getting the bid. She wanted to know why the low bid was not
being accepted and what the legal implications were for not
accepting the low bid,
Tom Shaw, Assistant Purchasing Agent, stated that the items
that were indicated in his memorandum sucn as the warranty, the
capacity, the hydraulic system, etc, were areas that dealt with
the specifications with the exception of the warranty, The
difference between the low bid and the recommended bid was
$155.50. Other areas taken into consideration such as the
capacity, the hydraulic system, the material that the body was
made of, warranty repair center, weight of the unit and the
cylinders were some of the major items, Pao Mot had bid in the
City of Denton on numerous occasions in which they had not been
the low bid and had bid on numerous ocassions where they had
been the low oid, The City had purcnased a front loader and in
the past, a Pao Mot rear loading unit, They were satisfactory
pieces of equipment. In this particular instance, Purchasing
chose to recommend the Rand bid based on complete
standardization with 7 units currently in the fleet. There was
approximately $8,000 worth of repair parts in stock to keep the
units dependable and on the street, It was the opinion of Jack
Jarvis, Fleet Operations Supervisor and himself that if the
owner unit, the Pao Mot, were purchased more money would have
to be spent for additional spare parts. There would be a
possible down time of two-three days if the Pao Mot unit were
purchased while parts were obtained The other unit could be
put back into operation within two-three hours due to
sufficient stock on hand. Shaw stated that he did now want to
be argumentative but he did not make such a statement to the
Pao Mot individual. He did not ever make such a statement
because the low bid was not always the best, responsible bid
for the City of Denton. Numerous bids had been brought to
Council in the past where the low bid was not the recommended
bid. Every attempt was made to do so every time the low bid
met specifications and was in the jest interest of the City of
DentOne He had talked with the Pao Mot representative on
numerous ocassions on many different products. At no time did
he ever indicate to the Par Mot representative that being the
` low bid would assure him of the business in the City of
l i Denton. The company had not called on the City of Denton in
eight-ten yeara and had not responded to City bids. They had
not notified the City in changes in their industry and had not
participated in specification developments. The only contact
they had had with the Pao Mot Corporation was through Davis
Trucking Equipment. It was not his intention to cast any
shadows on Pao Mot, they did an excellent job in the industry.
Pao Mot nad supplied him witn two cities as references and as
J
I
r
1
City of Denton city Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page 10
noted in his memoranduia, one city was extremely dissatisfied
and the other was not very complimentary. Shaw felt that after
talking with the using department, with the fleet operations
people and reviewing the bids as far as compliance with
specifications, that the Rand unit bid by Lone Star Peterbilt
was the best unit for the City of Denton at that time.
Council Member Boyd asked if Pac Mor met the bid specifications
given a certain parameter.
Shaw replied yes, given the intent of the specifications but
that intent must be qualified. Par Mor had not participated
for some time in the specification development. The
specifications had changed over the years with refuse trucks.
If no one informs them that changes needed to be made in the
{ specifications, they would not be aware of those changes.
Boyd asked if a bid was ever done with spare parts included in
the bid.
Shaw replied that the dollar amount had to be taken into
consideration. In this particular instance, the $155.50 was so
` insignificant that standardization would override that. It the
City had been purchasing three trucks, where the dollars could
be split for an inventory, then it would have been economically
feasible to do that. Since only one truck was being purchased,
it was felt that the $155.50 was best spent standardizing the
fleet. There was a method to bid a total cost package where
i the truck, the body and the maint4nance parts would be bid for
five yea trs. That he bidders the practice really crease thedprice because
whatever they would like to make.
to could do
tryi g to Manager,
evaluate stated
f job Lloyd but Harrell,
bide submitted bid
was felt that the Rand bid was the lowest and best bid. Not
only because of the interchangeability of parts but also the
f details of the unit that makes the Rand unit a better unit.
I
Debra Drayoviteh, City Attorney, stated that there was very
h little case law regarding not taking the low bid. It was
basically what a judge and jury would find to be the lowest and
beet bid. Based on the poor recommendations from the other two
r cities and not meeting specifications along with a superior
warranty, were in favor of the Rand bid.
Council Member Alexander stated that it was important to
remember that the City had to take the lowest and best bid and
not just the lowest bid. That was the key and in the past, the
1 Council had rejected the lowest bid because the recommendations
k they had and the references were not the best.
r
r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page 11
Alexander motioned, Gorton seconded to approve consent Agenda
item 5.11.1. Motion carried by a 5-1 vote with Mayor Pro Tem
Hopkins casting a "nay" vote.
6, ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
i~ contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or
services.
I The following ordl.nance was considered:
NO. 89-018
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
I roll vote. McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
i
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
providing foe the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance
with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from
requirements of competitive bids.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 89-019
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS
OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM
REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
MCAd4ms motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer
„aye Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tens Hr,pklns "Aye." Motion
carriad unanimously.
f C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving an agreement between the City of Denton and the State
of Texas for installation of a traffic signal controller at the
intersection of Loop 288 and Morse Street, (The Citizens
Traffic Safety Support commission recommended approval).
I
I
1
e rl
S
i
N
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page 12
,
The following ordinance was considered;
NO. 89-020
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF DENTON AND THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR INSTALLATION OF A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER AT THE INTERSECTION OF LOOP
288 AND MORSE STREET; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
- McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye." Alexander "aye," Gorton $'aye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd "ayA," and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
of the City of Denton, Texas, amending Section 21-9 of the Code i
i of Ordinances relating to the placement or painting of signs on
public property.
The following ordinance was considered:
4 NO. 89-021 i
I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING
SECTION 21-9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO THE
PLACEMENT OR PAINTING OF SIGNS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
$500.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Gorton motioned, McAdams secondod' to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer
,,aye,,, Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins "aye.,, Motion I
carried unanimously,
7. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
authorizing the Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas to execute
1 an agreement between the City of Denton and Sammons
} Communications, Inc. granting a license for the uas of certain
P electrical duct around the proposed Loop 288 and Stuart Road,
(The Public Utilities Board recommended approval),
The following resolution was considered:
I
I
a~
T'-
1yt
tot
7 11
4
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page 13
RESOLUTION NO. R89-010
AN RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CIT`: OF
DENTON, TEXAS TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF DENTON AND SAMMONS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. GRANTING A
LICENSE FOR THE USE OF CERTAIN ELECTRICAL DUCP AROUND
THE PROPOSED LOOP 288 AND STUART ROAD; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the resolution.
On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye,"
Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tom Hopkins "aye."
Motion car rigid unanimously.
8. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items:
A. The preliminary sales tax receipts was up from
last year and was ahead of budget projections.
B. The report from the 91 Committee was in need of
i Council direction:
(1) Was it agreeable with the Council for the Library I
to move ahead with the next steps for architectural changes in
the current library and begin looking for property donations
for a future site. Consensus of the Council was to proceed.
(2) Was it agreeable with the Council to utilize
savings from State change in fundi;tiq for sidewalks in
conjunction with street projects. 'Consensus of the Council was
to proceed.
i
(3) Was it agreeable with th4 Council to utili2n
money left over from the 1985 street aond issue for small
street projects and turn lanes. Consensus of the Council was
to proceed but to also look at ore Stree+: between Boliver and
Locust.
C. Consideration of a report on the 1989.1994
Capital Improvements Program.
This item was not discussed during the work session
and Harrell suggested Council consider the item at that time.
Frank Robbins, Executive Director foe Planning, stated that the
purpose of the discussion was to give the Council an
opportunity to give direction on the process and direction on
I
1
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 7, 1989
Page l4
the forms to be used to make decisions regarding the CIP
program. The process was started oarlier than last year in
order to give input to staff before the ranking went to the
Executive Staff. There would be several new items added to
thlu year's CIP which included a bond schedule, information on
the final document indicating facility operating costs for
those new facilities such as new recreational facilities, new
lit,rarles, new fire stations in order to get an idea about the
avorage annual operating coats for those new facilities.
94 There was no Executive Session held during the Work
Session.
I 10. New Business
The following items of new business were suggested by Council
Members for future agendast
A. Council Member Gorton requested a report on the
use of drainage channels for recreational purposes.
j 11. The Council convened into the Executive Session to
discuss legal matters (discussion of Flow Memorial Hospital
Bankruptcy), real estate, personnel and board appointments.
The Council reconvened into open session and took the following
action:
A. Boyd motioned, Alexander seconded to appoint
Sonya McDade Wesley to the community Development Block Grant
Committee. Motion carried unanimously,
S. McAdams motioned, Boyd seconded to appoint the
following to the Housing Task Force: Mark Floyd, Birdell
Carstarphen, and Celia Williamson. Motion carried unanimously.
With no further business, tha meeting was adjourned at 9:33 p.m.
JANE HOPKINS, MAYOR PRO TCM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
JENNIFER WALTERS
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTCN, TEXAS
3046C
I
,
N
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 14, 1989
The Council convened in the Special Called Session at 5130 p,m,
in the Civil Defense Room,
PRESENT= Mayor Stephensl Council Members Alexa d
Boyd, Gorton and McAdams, n er, Ayor,
ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
between7lthe t City execution
of t Denton and change Sunmount order Corporation1traand f
providing for an increase in the contract price, 1
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 89-012
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE
ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
SUNMOUNT CORPORATION: PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE
CONTRACT PRICEI AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
McAdams motioned, Gorton secondad to adopt the ordinance, On
roll vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye," Gorton 'aye,' Ayer
'aye,' Boyd 'aye,' and Mayor Stephens "aye.' Motion carried
w unanimously.
24 The Council considered a preliminary outlook for
1949-90 budget.
John Mccrane, Executive Director for Finance, presented
positive and negative items that might affect the budget, The
positive items included a sales, tax growth, that the state
economy appeared to have stabilized, the opening of the Texas
Instruments plant, overall revenues were holding steady,
expenditures were on target, and there were no new large items
impacting the budget. Negative items included an inverted
yield curve, the opening of the Lewisville Mall, property tax
valuos were at full value, and the construction and building
related activities were down,
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that two other negatives
were the possibility of increased support of the insurance
I program and the possibility of the Lewisville library going
on-line next year and the possible reduction of County funds
for the Denton library. He stated that the budget this year
would be tight and lean as last year's had been.
Item 06. was moved ahead in the agenda order.
I
t
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 14, 1989
Page 2
6. The Council considered an update of E 9-1-1,
John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance,
Task Force had been meeting stated that tile
two to three r, J
up to speed on technical issues imes per week to get
the board financing, etc, He
felt that significant .
and Board. The Task Fo
rors ad been made rcee9was recommending with tithe Board
receive a bid for the best and final proposal for the system,
Ce stated that the September date for going on-line was
longer valid and that a December 189 date was now being
considered. The Task Force no
chan es a g felt that unless the numbers f
g es dealr there would bc enough 1
answering points if financing was iissible from the for e
_ companies. A preliminary report woul, be ready a phone
roximat
March 1 with a recommendation for a system and financingottla
I later date,
The Council returned to the regular agenda order.
3.
The Council considered a utility forecast.
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities ~
major issues in the Utilit reviewed the
Council. Issues included y Forecast document presented to
V Denton to the year 2010 apdopulation estimates for the city of
1 areas to the year 2010 as thprojected populations in planning
wastewater capacity to other Cities,aavail bleat,aterasucitY and
4 projected water requirements, water treatment pale and
requirements, and wastewater flow. capacity
Alexander motioned, Ayer seconded to receive the Utility
Forecast as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Nelson then reviewed the planned development utility lines
concept discussing the ranking form and major issues for
ranking. The rankings included residential, commercial and
industrial rankings.
Council Menibar
n
finalization of plasrforrSpeeific companiesic hearing before
41 The Council considered a CIS update.
Rick Svehla, Deputy city
information of the program whichaincluded vanweassessment uof
needs and the finding of duplication of maps and information.
The committee was charged with finding a system to link
geographical information with data such as tax records, etc. A
Request for Information had been completed as well as Requests
City of Denton city Council Minutes
Feuruary 14, 1989
Page 3
for Proposals. The Committee had narrowed the responses to
three systems and would be going out to look dt the three
systems. Svehla stated that the prices for the system were
down from when they first started looking at them due to
advances in technology.
5. The Council considered personnel items of a management
study on health insurance and classification and pay plan study.
Tom Klinck, Personnel Director, stated the the management study
for the health insurance program had been awarded to Coopers
and Lybrant to review/analyze the current plan, review/analyza
the current funding, review/analyze claims administration and
control, Section 89 compliance, recommendations for
alternatives and plan design, Currently they were looking ad
schedules and timelinna, discussion of specific documents and
information, comparing other organizations and entities, claims
history, flexible benefits, Section 89 analysis, a 5 year
projection, and alternatives for financial stability. This
year's open enrollment has seen a significant number of
employees come back to the City plan. An employee insurance
committee had boon formed, Klinck was working with the
D,I.S,D, the County, U.N.T. and T.W,U, to work together as a
` block in terms of insurance,
I Klinck stated that Request for Proposals had been sent in 1988
II for the classification and pay plan study. The proposals would
be analyzed and consultant selection would be approximately
1 February 1989, A recommendation would go to Council sometime
4 in April, 1989 and with approval the project could begin in
April 1989 through March 1990, The study would include job
analysis, an update of job descriptions, job evaluations and
pay plan update. A final presentation would be made to the
Executive Staff sometime in March 1990 and to Council with
approval for a 1990/1991 implementation.
7. Council considered planning issues of Subdivision
Regulations, Unrelated persons in single family districts,
Appendix A-Denton Development Plan, and Completion of Master
Plan.
Frank Robbins, Executive Director fir Planning, presented the
issues.
Robbins stated that staff was continuing to rewrite the
Subdivision Regulations, The next section would be the
{ drainage section with flood plain options such as who pays for
what when. The section after that would be the process section
and staff would be looking at streamlining, Council and
platting issues, platting and building permits, and large rural
tracts,
4
I
City of Denton City council minutes
February 14, 1989
Page 4
Robbins stated that a citizen request had prompted staff to
look at the number of unrelated persons in single family
districts. The Planning and Zoning Commission had also decided
to look at group home/family home zoning for the handicapped
plus a "bed and breakfast" ordinance.
Consensus of the Council was to nave the Planning and Zoning
Commission look at the issue of number of unrelated persons in
single family districts and report back to Council if any
further action was necessary.
With regards to Appendix A - Denton Development Plan, Robbins
stated that it was almost complete with boundaries, land use
survey and LUMIS in place. Moderate activity center and
intensity policy analysis were areas still under consideration.
I
Robbins stated that the Master Plan completion included a
compilation of existing maps and policies, open spaces/parks,
housing, and land use utility transportation. Staff was
currently working in these areas.
8. Council considered an update on plans for recreation
centers.
i
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parke and Recreation, stated that a
potential site had been found for a northeast recreation
center. Approximately 13-14 acres could be donated in the
Kings Row/Loop 288 area. There were two sources of dedicated
land on one site.
Council Member McAdams asked what the site could do for the
City - location wise. What would be the usability of the
center in that location.
Brinkman replied thaC it would give the City a fairly large
area to locate a recreation center and a neighborhood park.
Along Kings Row would provide good access and would buffer the
center from residential homes on the other aide of the road.
It also provided good visibility for the center.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that staff felt it was
important to look at donated property versus buying the
' property especially in the current budget times.
G McAdams stated that the placement should be carefully
considered.
• I
Council Member Alexander suggested a municipal complex with a
fire station and library adjacent to the center might be a
possibility.
i
! r
f
City of Denton City Council Minutes
February 14, 1989
Page 5
9. Council considerQ4 an update of the "COPS" Program.
Mike Jez, Chief of volice, stated that the mutual goals of the
program included (1) locate, identify and prosecute three
repeat offenders - two of the three had been arrested (2)
increase narcotic arrests by at least 39 - in the last two
months there had been a 2809 increase with more arrests in
those two months than in six months the previous year; (3)
reduce residential burglaries by 39 - in January 1988 there
were 33 residential burglaries, in 1989, there were 81 (4)
r increase officer initiated activity by 159 in the area of
number of citations, number of arrests, number of calls
initiated - so far this year, there was a 459 increase in this
areal (5) increase interaction between residents and police -
officers would be encouraged to have three hours daily
h out-of-unit time but this goal was not reached as the members
f nf the team were busier than they thought in regards to other
activities and (6) displace disorderly groups in the area -
officers were using cameras to take pictures of the groups
which seemed to be discouraging them from congregating in the
area.
Jez stated that the concerns of the neighborhood were drugs,
burILary and personal safety. He stated that another major
goa was to maintain response time. They had, in fact, reduced
the average response time from 11.5 minutes to 8.5 minutes
within the target area,
An additional project was the establishment of a youth program
for youth between the ages of 8-18. A police athletic league
1 was in the forming stage and a Board of Directors had been
established.
Following staff reports, Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney,
updated Council on two litigation cases.
Council Member Cotton asked for a progress report on 2499.
Council Member Ayer asked for a survey regarding the airport, I
Deputy City Manager Svehla stated-that this was in progress. 1
Ayer also asked for a report on citizen donations to the
utility fund,
4 With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9102 p.m.
E
i
RAY STEPHENSt-NKM
'
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I JENNIFER ALTERS, CITY 1
SECRETARY W
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
3052C
I
I
Nor I milli
i`
k
V
~I
V
I
i i
UZI=
JEJET=
j
i
1
EJEI=
I ~
I
E
r
DATE: 03/01/69
CC ITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BOUNDARIES OF MODERATE ACTIVITY
CENTER 178 AS PART OF APPENDIX A OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN;
AMENDING THE INTENSITY PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY MAP AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Appendix A Task Force and the Planning and Zoning Commission
voted unanimously to recommend adoption.
SUMMARY
The recommended boundaries are as follows:
"Commencing at I-358 and Lillian Miller and following the service
road north to a line which separates existing commercial development
and single family SF-16 zoning rand following the said line south and
then west to Lillian Miller thereby excluding the area currently
zoned SF-16; and following Lillian Miller south to a line which
separates GR and 2F zoning and then following the said line west and
then south and finally west to I-359 and following the I-351 service
road northeast to Lillian Miller; the said boundaries will
incorporate all of the existing commercial/retail dovelopment at
that intersection."
BACKGROUND:
The Appendix A Task Force was appointed by City Council to make
recommendations with respect to the boundaries of intensity areas as
part of Appendix A. The Task Force considered the boundaries of
moderate activity center 078 and agreed that the existing Commercial
Retail development totalling 23.15 acres was adequate for this
center which is abutting the Golden Triangle Mall. The recommended
boundaries will result in a corresponding change to the boundaries
of the adjacent low intensity area 179 as shown on the attached map.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
' Not applicable.
I
ti
s
y
4
Moderate Activity Center
March 1, 1989
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable.
49p lly submitted:
Prepared by: . 4 r
A geer
Harry N. Pereaud, AICP
Senlor Planner
Appro'ed , ~i /
H. Rob ne, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
1610/2
f
1
f ~
I ~
i
i
i
I
r~
V
j
161 IL
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BOUNDARIES OF MODERATE ACTIVITY CENTER
NL'MBFR 78 AS PART OF APPENDIX A OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN;
AMENDING THE INTENSITY PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY MAP; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Denton Development Plan requires that the
boundaries of the intensity areas to be included in Appendix A
should be considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Appendix A Task Force and the Planning and Zoning '
Commission considered the boundaries for Moderate Activity Center
Number 78 and hereby recommend its adoption as part of Appendix A;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the boundaries for Moderate Activity Center
Number 78, a copy of which is attached hereto, is adopted as part
of Appendix A of the Penton Development Plan.
SECTION II. That the intensity planning area boundary map is ;
amen a to show the location of Moderate Activity Center Number 78
as adopted and to show the corresponding change in the boundaries
of the abutting low intensity planning areas.
SECTION III. That the City Secretary is hereb• directed to
attacna copy of this resolution to Resolution 88-057, which
provides for the adoption of the Denton Development Plan,
SECTION IV. That this resolution shall become effective upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
1
KU-3 O M)NOR
ATTEST;
nT1ETM
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
U y
1
J
JJi
r~
V
a n. f Q~ F ' ~O t
AO-6
fl CTO , I
00 ~
dF .0
AREA #79
103 O PD-28 • : I
I'
og I.
0 0PO-49
GR I
r .
an =a
PD. J. 4b
ea~'~M~b~T ♦ I ~ I
PD-871 SF-10
S
i
A
t,I SF-10 MODERATE
A ' ACTIVITY
CENTER #78
lISF-1 A SF- I 0 ~
i '
1 --•..I
-16 0
i I S-192 i
' o = SF-10 I
L..r......-1 `...w.
I
:L PAS10
A r....-------t
A I
SF-13 I
r- -II
I pn_aa I
i
rT-I= -I
I
I
I
I
~ i
j
I
4w .1 H
i
R
DATE: 03/01/89
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
j,
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDKR A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BOUNDARIES OF MODERATE ACTIVITY
C8NTKR 176 AS PART OF APPENDIX A OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN; f
AMENDING THE INTENSITY PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY MAP AND PROVIDING FOR I
AN KFFKCTIVE DATE.
RKCOKKINDATION:
The Appendix A Task Force and the Planning and Zoning Commission
voted unanimously to recommend adoption.
- SUMMARY:
The recommended boundaries are as follows:
1 "Commencing at Pockrus and I-35C and following Pockrua Road east to
MKT Railroadj then following the MKT Railroad southeast to Denton i
city limits, then following the city limits west to I-351 and along I
I-358 north to Pockrua Road and incorporating approximately
70 acres."
1
BACKGROUND:
The Appendix A Task Force considered the boundaries of thia moderate I+J
activity center and agreed that it would be unreasonable to
encourage single [amity residential development In a corridor
located between the MKT Railroad and the 1-358. The recommended
boundaries will result in changes to the boundaries of the abutting
low intensity areas 163, 165 and 175 as shown on attached map.
PROORAM, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS_AFF8CT8D;
Not appllcable. {
FISCAL IMPACT: J
~ I
Not applicable.
4VLydPrepared by:
Harrell
l
\ m ~1111~ _ City Manager
f 1 Harry Persaud, AICP
Senior Planner
I
Approved: ,
an H.obbins, AICP
8xecutive Director
Planning and Development
161;k/l
a
µ
2611L
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BOUNDARIES OF MODERATE ACTIVITY CENTER
NUMBER 76 AS PART OF APPENDIX A OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN;
AMENDING THE INTENSITY PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY MAP; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. J
WHEREAS, the Denton Development Plan requires that the
boundaries of the intensity areas to be included in Appendix A
should be considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Appendix A Task Force and the Planning and Zoning
Commission considered the boundaries for Moderate Activity Center
Number 76 and hereby recommend its adoption as part of Appendix A;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
i
SECTION I. That the boundaries for Moderate Activity Center
Number 7F, a copy of which is attached hereto, is adopted as part
of Appendix A of the Denton Development Plan.
SECTION II. That the intensity planning area boundary map is
amen a try s ow the location of Moderate Activity Center Number 76
j as adopted and to show the corresponding change in the boundaries
of the abutting low intensity planning areas.
SECTION III. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to
attacT a copy` of this resolution to Resolution 88-057, which
provides for the adoption of the Denton Development Plan,
SECTION IV. That this resolution shall become effective upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989.
I
ATTEST:
'fY~3F`OAETAEEY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
L)
t
I j j I'~j; I
r
it Lr i i ! i ~
f I I
m ~ 1~ J ! I
O 1 '
ssss~
r • 1'
r I IOWA aA ROAa + / •rr1 J•J._.
.r.. l lu1 41
AREA #6 , MODERATE I,
I ACTIVITY
CENTER#78 i
1
' owl
a
W Y ORII Ra '
f ~
I
1
b i AREA
EA #6
i
1 I
I 1 •
COMM
11
I~ nn
11
II 1e/
.1
wow
F
`I
f
i
E
i
i
i
i
i
I
I
i
I
Ji
1
~ I
• 1
I
I
l
i
1
1
1
V
i
s
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / OEN TON, TEXAS 78201 /TELEPHONE (817) 888.8307
- office of the City Manager
M X M O R A N D U M
I
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: February 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Oak & Hickory Project j
We have enc).osed all the information that we gave to the
Council at the last meeting. I have also included a drawing
which shows the different sections of Oak and Hickory and the
related options, These options relate directly to the
informational chart that to included in the backup. We have
also been monitoring the parking situation, and we will have
more inclusive information available at the meeting, t
t Council also asked for a more to-depth look at pedestrian
problems on Hickory. The Staff is evaluating the crossing
areas. We think new pavement with now marking and advance
signs very similar to Welch will help define the areas and
bring much more attention to the pedestrian crossings for
vehicular traffic. We think this will work in most areas and {
i would suggest that we move forward based on this scenario.
once the facility is built and all of the crossings are in
place, we would suggest revisiting the project to look at the
effects of the new crossings and new signage. If they are
still having problems, we would then look at reducing speed and
installing flashers or other safety improvements.
111 it you or the Council has further questions, we will be happy
to try and answer them.
ve 1a
Deputy City Manager
RS:bw
4459M
Attachments
i
• O a'f
JAGOE
s
c~ NORMAL
AVE. 8
v= m
AVE.A x FRY >
2
I,,,, r---
P ~
f AMAR1LL
mamommmmewl"
rn
l1 /11r J
1 / J
aoNy_c e tAr, ~1 -
t 1 A _ `Is , ~ ~
ev [
- it S S
eRA r z Z ro
4V N N +
n 1 + N
W 0 N TEA
A.
CO _J A O O I (n
m
A NORMAL Rl
UA,. V 11
I '
Al A I _ - AVd.A R u
NrRA L 'p
0~ N Z1
~ z
- 4- fl
r ~ ro N
AMARL" X
4 ~j[RNAR +
N
r N ~ ~ UNTI
~ fl
DAN TON _
r
CITY OF DENTON
SO/._,) APPOINTMENT INFORMATION
~[~,~~sJrl, L G'-y I/ L'-sr li e, A'
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
• i. xil i ;l., r•,
CITY, STATE ZIP CODE
Lllk OF EMPLOYER
ADDRESS c EMPLOYER
L),r, PHONE
~ r
CITY-1'a r. ^ c.
STATE ZIP OD
CCUPATION c
HAVE YOU PRIOR SERVICE ON A CITY BOARD?
IF YESr PLEASE DESCRIBES
NAME OF CITl'S
WOULD YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ANY BOARD? t:,,
IF YES# PLEASE DESCRIBES
ON WHICH BOARD DO YOU WISH TO SERVE? //~cY:•l /y,,,~
STJ/~TEMENT OF' APPLICANTS
J /7 l/ h
to.
/or•
_ LC 1lS 'i a ~~raJr.
DATZ
BIGNAav1~p VF APPLICANT
tM MfM1A ArnND~ NCI poLzr
tk is the policy of the city of Denton city Ceunall that members of the
varleuf City 'Ioardf and CoeMifeions be removed free office for tack of
attandanoe at the "(1648 meetings o9 the boards and Co Misslons. Meabstf may
b. realered en the lolloring basis$
1. !
lul f_Meellnos Board Members may be reserved lroa office log
See nnestus a fences duringq the course of one year and/or tack
o! attendants as !gt o9 the number of regular meetings in the yefr,
1eeolal
Sea-TfaTit' a3lii sdareisn ti+'nnear f Ioard MeabeN ■ay be rered freer efllee
at lot o! the number of Ipfoial Called
Meetings in erne yea;.
An uneseused absence is defined as an absence for 014h no advanced
notification is given And/or as deteralnsd by the Chatraan of the affeeted
{ Board or Co"Issiona
WIN Use
TERM OF APPOINTMENTS
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NPRNMI" E
ESENTED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS IN
EXECUTIVE SESSIONO AND NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN UNTIL THE SECOND
TSNG,OW NG THE PRESENTATIONa
p0
x,....11 r1FCR 2 Z I9~9 6304A
:CITY
rra~.,;,
k<
Lindy Ruggiero
3637 Acorn Green Circle
Garland, TX 75043
February 27, 1989
Ms, Jennifer Walters
City Secretary
-1 City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, TX 75021
Dear Ms. Walters:
i
I am a graduate student in Political Economy at the
University of Texas at Dallas. in connection with a current
research project, I am contacting each city in the Dallas/Fort
Worth metroplex to request (a) a copy of the city charter (if
a home-rule city), (b) a copy of the the current operating
budget and (c) the date general elections are held (i.e., 3rd
Saturday in May).
i
If possible, please mail the charter and budget to me at
the above address. A note regarding your city's election
schedule would also be of great assistance. If there is an
associated charge for either the charter or budget, please
advise by return mail so that I may remit payment in advance.
Thank you in advance for your assistance! 1
Very truly yours, 1
i
Lindy Ruggiero
i
/1r I
4 Zt
1
C
i
I
I
i
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICtP_ AL BUILOLNO / DENTON, TEXAS 16201 / TELEPHONE (817) 508.9307
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
III
M FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: Febtuary 16, 1989
SUBJECT: Lane Width on Oak 5 Hickory
I
Attached you will find the minutes of the Historic Landmark
Commission and the Planning and Zoning commission from the
discussions on Oak and Hickory. As you can see from the
minutes, there was lengthy discussions at both meetings,
Besides that, we have had a number of neighborhood meetings to
try and disseminate information and to gather commants.
We have attempted to look at each of the streets individually
and in some instances, specific pieces of it, In each of these
I cases, the Historic Landmark Commission and P 6 Z made specific
recommendations about these sections. Finally, we have added
an option or effect column for the council to consider when
` reviewing these roads.
Hickory Street from Welch to Bonnie Brae had the least amount
toinput.
451. TTheexisting
in width amount from public
vathe ries least
street comments
section and
original proposal was for 371 of width which would provide two
lanes of traffic and one lane of parking and could ultimately
be to-aligned to three lanes of traffic if such a need ever
materialized.
the section from tWelch Landmark rBonnie iBras. did owerem
much on more
concerned with the section from Welch to Carroll, Their main
comment was to convert Hickory to a two-way street for the
length of it. Several months ago, Council asked that Staff
t investigate the possibility of doing a comprehensive review of
plan. We have
COO regarding boon this proposals
out from transportation
will be submitting a proposal for consideration during the
budget process. out suggestion would be to wait and look at
this option in a comprehensive way at the time the
transportation plan review is authorized by the Council.
Nothing in this proposal would preclude making such a shift it
I such was determined to be desitablo at a later date.
I
7
Lloyd V. Harrell
February 16, 1969
Page 2
Planning and zoning's comment was that it should remain as it
is with the proviso that parking could he deleted (i.e, the
street could be narrowed) in front of multi-family or
non-residential property. This would mean that the street
could vary from 34' to 36' of width for two lanes of traffic
and one lane of packing In existing sections depending on how
much of the gutter section would be used for the parking lane
and to 37' if you wanted to narrow some of the 45' sections.
Our suggestion would be to standardize it to 37'. It still
oltminates the wide excessive pavements and yet provides us
with flexibility in the future. Staff feels that this standard
is basically consistent 'with discussions at the P & Z level and
design work can commence.
On Oak Street, there was much more comment from Carroll to
Bonnie Brae. We have broken it into several sections to
clarify some of the suggestions of HLC and P & Z since there
were separate comments made for separate areas.
From Carroll to Avenue C, the width varies from 34 1/4' to 36'
wide, and the street is basically two lanes of travel and one
lane of parking. In some of the western sections, there has
not been any history of parking on the street. Again, out I
original staff proposal was for a 37' roadway which would have
allowed two lanes of traffic, one lane of parking and the
possibility of converting the street to three lanes. The
Historic Landmark Commission suggested that the exact footprint
be rebuilt tot this section of street, i.e. the street would
vary from 34 1/44 to 361. They also wanted us to look at
convecting it to a two-way street section. We would suggest
this should be looked at when we look at the overall
~M transportation plan. Planning & Zoning also recommended that
we leave the street as is from Carroll to Avenue C, i.e. two
lanes of travel, one lane of parking, and the street varying
from 34 1/4, to 36' . In the options or of facts categori, tine
Staff would just note that since the street does widen and
narcow somewhat, it does make tot subtle changes when
travelling the length of the street. Also, It the footprint is
built, then it would preclude us fcom ultimately using it as a
i three lane street it that is needed in the future since there
would be problem with lane widths and our standard fictions,
On the section from Avenue C to Avenue 0, the street varies in
width from 36' to 371. It could be used for two lanes of
travel and one lane of parking, Currently, it is used for two
lanes of travel and two lanes of parking. Again, out original
proposal was for 37' providing for two lanes of traffic and one
lane of parking and ultimately could be expanded to three lanes
of traffic, The Historic Landmark Commission suggested that
this section should not be widened at all, but the footprint
+
i
Lloyd V. Harrell
February 16, 1989
Page 3
should be left as is. They also wanted to look at converting
it to two-way. Planning and Zoning suggested that the
footprint also be left allowing for two lanes of traffic and
one or two lanes of parking. They suggested to Council that
they leave the two lanes of parking and change it if there are
some safety problems. Under the options and effects column, we
have listed a couple of concerns or points that we think are
pertinent. If you want to leave the two-way traffic, i.e. two
lanes of traffic with two lanes of parking, we think the street
is too narrow. Normal standard sections would be 121 lanes for
two-way traffic plus 8' parking lanes. If that were the case,
the normal street sections should be 41' rather than 36' or
37'. We think there would be some safety problems if the
street is not widened as the use continues to grow in this
area. We would also be looking at building a street that is
substandard according to our current subdivision standards. If
the street is left at 36, or 371, we would suggest to you that {
two lanes of travel and one lane of parking be allowed. This
would again allow for safe movement of traffic and still allow
parking in the neighborhood.
E
! Finally, the section of oak from Avenue 0 to Bonnie Brae varies
in width from 38, to 42~. It is used as two lanes of traffic +
and one lane of parking in most areas. The Historic Landmark
Commission did not really talk very much about this area of the
road, Planning and Zoning made comment that where there is
multi-familyareas or off street parking provided that they
thought going to 371 would be reasonable. We would again
suggest to you that 371 allowing two lanes of travel and one
lane of parking would eliminate unnecessary width in the
street, still carry all the tcakfic and could ultimately be
used as a three lane kind of section if that was the desire of
the Council in the future.
Finally, on Hickory between Carroll and Welch, there was ,
discussion by HLC and P 6 Z. We have not looked at this
particular section in very much detail simply because it was
not in the Street Bond Issue. HLC suggested that we look at
making two lanes of travel and two lanes of parking or convect
it to a two-way section. Planning 6 Zoning suggested we leave
it as existing configutation with three lanes of travel and one
lane of parking. Again, we are suggesting to you since it was
not in the 1786 Bond Issue, we should leave it as is and look
3 at it again in the transportation study.
In summary, the Staff has some problems with the western
sections of oak if we leave as is and we continue to have
parking on both sides of it, The other sections can be rebuilt
as is, and we can put two lanes of traffic and one lane of
I
i
i
i
I
Lloyd V. Harrell
February 16, 199%
Page 4
Parking. It would preclude some expansion in future years,
pSrtoafvfide has a s always suggested that the 37' foot section be used to
street that would be used just as Is now, i.e. In the
one-way sections, it would have two lanes of travel and one
lane of parking. Staff also suggested that if this narrower
section is used, no areas of Oak Street would have two lanes of
parking. However, if this is the desire of the Council for two
lanes of parking west of Avenue C. we would suggest a little
bit wider street.
In co erusion. nwouaan also offer that the 371 sections, or the
narrow sectios, built are some existing trees along without taking any tree.
both of these streets that
are in very poor shape right now, If is the sil r
them, it may cause some f4tther damage wtodrootrsystemsothatewe
cannot assess at this time. However, we believe we will not
have to remove any trees to build either the 371
the narrower sections, or in the area west of Avenuec~ithe, or
1 sections with the exception of one tree he 41
Just
and Oak Street. This tree was discussed at P 6 2tlevel, Pu3 Z
understood that we would have to remove the tree because of
some drainage improvements that we will have to make. Although
+ they understood this, they did not mention it in their minutes
as approving that one removal.
understand that and were in agreementlthatgthatttrso would have
to be removed no matter what section was built, You, they did
I~
At the P & At the ez meeting, the commissioners asked the Staff to
notify fect
Council would make thesepwidth ecisions, the meeting where the
the information to the Council now,so th to tho giving all of
chance to review it and ask for any other information, We will have a
would suggest that we schedule this item for the regular
session On This residents if Fthat is the Coun iil is desire us to notify all the
Both Frank and myself will be at the Tuesday meeting. If we
can provide further information to you or the Council, we would
be happy to try and answer an
` Y questions,
Ih ( Rick Svsh a
Deputy City Manager
RS:bw
4446M
Attachments
-77
1
a
3
I
4
4
jY
OAK / HICKORY PLANNING ISSUES
EXISTING STREET SECTION ORIGINAL HISTORIC
CPT
RI CW4 PLANNING R ZONING C%V ICNS/EFfECTS TO CONSIDER
LOCATION WIDTH RANGE EXISTING USE STAFF PROPOSAL
LANW 1, HICKORY 35, to 45, 351-451 bib 2 TR, 371 bib providing NOT AGURESSEO Not and ioPK Lanes - HOUe er, currently )unused e as
parking lane ants be widened. 2 TR 570 bib Welch to I PK Lanes for 2 TR Lanes,
Bonnie Ores I PK Lanes( perking can be deleted In
Portlon3 - 45, Ultimate: 3 TR 'CONVERT TO front of multi-tamlly or
bib basically Lanes TWO WAY nonresidential property
unused as parking 341 to 361 ■ 2 TR 4 1 PK
371 • 3 TP.
-1 4411) 34,25 - 361. 2 TR 4 1 rA
2, Oyu, 34,20' to 421 Carroll to Ave C 3T' b/b providing DON'T WIDEN Carroll to Avenue C precludes safe wtds .nq to 3 TR
54,27' to 361 for 2 TR Lanes, Leave footprint
Carroll 34.25 to 36 • 2 TR 4 I PK (2) 371 • 2 TR 4 1 PKI Ultimately could
to Bonnie 2 TR 4 I PK I PK Lanes be safely Aden to 3 7R
Brae ultimate: 3 TR 4CONVERT TO
Avenue C to Ave G Lanes TWO WAY Avenue C to Avenue G (I) 411 - 2 tR 4 2 PK
361 to 371 • 2 TR 4 36' to 371 • 2 TR 4 I PK with standard lane widths
I PK or 2 TR 4 2 PK or • 2 TR 4 2 PK 421 361 to 37' Remove
I PK Lane • 2 TR 4 I PK
44(3) 361 to 371 Leave 2 TR 4 2 PK
Non Standard Section ,
Ave 0 to Bonnte Er Avenue 0 to Bonn Ie Brae 11) 371 2 TR - I PK TNIa eliminates
361 to 421 2 TR ♦ 351 to 421 a 2 TR 4 I Pttt Snfeeeded/excess paverentl
I PK
eve as voted 15, not 3, HICKORY 42.4 42.4 Not In ProJec) NOT IN PROJECT Coside nvefravelth 3 TR LEnating PK nrher• Perform
prevsntetlwealntsnenc~es needed
Correll LIMITS
lane to park multi-family + non- In next few veers (crack see{, overlay or
to Welch lane res406ntlel (exists on recycle)
*Proposed south side)
rnnllquraflon
2TR 42PK
CONVErtT TO
TWO WAY
I
TR ■ Travel
PK • Parking
b/b4 Back to Back
` 4 To be examined as part of comprehensive review of the trensportatlon Plan.
f 445trost sections on Oak (above) will not be standard • main Issues to consider
0642E
i
I
t
s
R
t
OAK./ HICKORY PLANNING ISSUES
SPECIAL NOTES:
A. Lane Widths 11' - One Way
12' - Two Way J
8' - Parking II11
4' - Curb $ Gutter not considered in width
B. All radii at intersections to be 20' minimum according to +
City standards.
C. Traffic design and parking changes to be routed through
Traffic Safety Commission.
D. (1) Proposed parking on Oak to remain on south side
Carroll to Bonnie Brae
(2) Parking on Hickory to remain on north side Carroll
to Bonnie Brae.
E. Tree Considerations / Modifications
1. Liming operations will not be normal 1' behind curb;
save trees by staying at back of curb and avoiding
roots.
2. Small horizontal curves will be added to protect
trees if needed.
3. Hickory - Welch to Bonnie Brae - 0 Trees Removed
i
Oak - Carroll to Bonnie Brae - 1 Large Hackberry
'f'ree Removed
Hickory - Carroll toy Welch - Not in project - 0
reT- esRemoved
0642E {
I
J
t
3
4
S
y
~~Yember ~~I. il~y
Page o
and the City Council In accordance with he ur.tte proCedur•s
set out in the Denton Development Plan. The Executive
Director for Plannln and Development shall be responsible
for preparinq and uplating the intensity calculations for
each of the noderate and low Intensity areas in accordance
with the standard methodology and boundaries contained in
Appendix .A."
Ms. Brock stated that staff would not be changing the
boundaries but would be changing the calculations.
Mr. Persaud agreed.
Mr. Engeibrecht stated that the calculat Ions were designed
after the Plan was approved. He asked if this was just in
administrative detail. Mr. Persaud said yes.
Ms. Brock stated that the policy should be changed to real
Inks appendix is to be developed by a committee
comprised of r•-reseneatives .
DECISION: Ms. rack moved to recommend approval of the
po 17 cy as amended. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and
unanimously carried l7.01.
F. Consider making a recommendation on Article 17, Signs, of
Appendix B, Zoning of the Code of Ordinances.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that the Government
Petitions Committee has requested more time to consider the
Chan to and submit those changes for the Planning and Zoning
meeting on December lath.
Ih Ms. Brock asked Ms. Carson to review the schedule of the
Moratorium, Ms. Carson said that the City Council has
extended the moratorium until February 21, 1919. The
requirement for emending the ordinance is that the Planning
and Zoning Commission make a recommendation to the City
Council and then the Council would hold a public hearing on
the issue and make a decision. She said that the Plannln!
and Zoning Commission will have only one Meeting in December
and the City Council would be meeting on the 3rd and 17th of
January and the 7th and 31st o[ February. The City Council
would need an additional work fusion for considevatlon
before a motion would be made and the Council has rrevtously
requested that this type of item not be scheduled for a
special called meeting.
Ms. Carson continued that a chart in the Commissioners back
up showed the sign requirements In other titles.
Ms. Brock asked when vas the lest possible date to have the f
draft sign ordinance brought to the Commission. Ms. Carson 1
stated the first staging in January in order for staff to
advertise fifteen days prior to the City Council public
hearing. II
G. Consider matting a recommendation on an amendment to the
Denton Development Plan to add a note to the Thoroughfare
Plan In relation •c OaklHickorl Street,
SIAFP 0.EPORT: Mr. Robbins stated that in the Lommlsflanerf'
packets wf a copy t[ IS+ ppoltcy amendment and the recom-
mendstions that wife ma dm by the Historic Landmark
Commission.
Mr. Robbins ssld that at the last Historic Landmark
Co me IiIIon meeting, staff had expressed concerns and after
discussion the Historic Landeark Comaission made the tol-
lowing recommendations:
1) Oak Street between Bonnle Brae and Carroll Boulevard l4t sluston-streetwp rkingainaselected[Areasoandlorlbkkaef
p I
tams in selected areas.
i ,
I
f
ph7 Ntl it et
%or.aber Sa, 1394
Palo
2) Hickory Street from Carroll Roulevard to heicn Street
should be no wider than allowing three travel lanes
and on-street parking on one side of Hickorv Street
and/or bike lanes, Hickory Street from Belch to
Bonnie Brae should be no wider than allowing two
travel lanes and on-street parking Ind or bike Lanes.
Mr. Robbins stated that the Hickory Street request could not 1
be supported by staff at this time.
J) In addition to the travel lanes, parking that is
allowed on both sides of Oak and Hickory Streets
should be allowed to remain on both sides, except as
follows: a) where multI -(am ily development in excess
of 10 unirs per acre or non- residential development
exists. On-street parking nay be el in l noted on the
side of the street with such a Ill IV or
non-residential area, b) Between Jagoe and Avenue G.
parking on the north side of Oak Street may be removed
after a finding by the Clty Council that such would be
in the i,.terest of safe and efficient traffic flow.
On-street parking an the south side of this section of
Oak should not be eliminated unless the Council finds '
that placing a bike lane In this section 1s in the
public interest by maximizing the transportation
capabilities of existing streets,
Mr. Svehla sold that included In the back-up was a letter
from the Engineering Department regarding the Oak and
Hickory Street project. He said that what is stated In the
policy stateaent regarding two travel lines would not be a
problem vlth Engineering. The possible problem may be in
j, the future. ae sold that he felt the 37 foot versus the SS
foot width of the road would be acceptable. There are some
j concerns with Avenue C. to Avenue G and leaving the street
the same widths.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked what the current minimum standards are
for residential streets. Mr. Svehla stated that he believed
it WAS 10 feet,
Mr. In olbrtcht asked if Englneering planned on recon•
strutting the streets, Mr. Svehla stated that It the roads
veto in good shape and the drainage requirements met ,he
standards, reconstructing the streets ma not be metesxory.
He added that the bond issue vas to rebuild Oak and Hickory
Streets And not slde streets that tie Into Oak and Hickory
Street.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked It the utilities were replaced, what
standards would be required to be ■et. The standards of the
time o construction or today's standards, Mr. Svehla said
It would have cc meet with today's standards. J
Ms, Brock asked if the sidewalks would be replaced,
Mr. Svehla said the funds would be Applied first to the
1lcdristruction of the roads and if any funds are left over,
they would be used for the sidewalks.
George Stuart, IOOS N. Gak Denton, President of the west Oak j
Property Owners Associaelon, stated that the association was
in support of the olicy to show no changes for Melt Oak
Iro■ Ja oe to Bonne Iraq, Ito said that redesigning the
street is the opposite idea of the property owners. By
widening the street, the spted limit would be increased and
so would problems with traffic generation.
Ms. Brock asked Mr. Stuart It he had any documentation
stating that there would be an increase of speeding If the
street WAS widened. He. Stuart said no but ggcaas# the
street Is close to the college he assumed there would be.
Mr. Cochran stated that he was in support of the existing
footprint but also felt It would after the speed of the
' I
i
i
1
s r
w
1 ~
Ph7 M,~,tes
\or!ether Sa, iiii ~
Page d
,
drivers on the road. He said that he is concernel with
safety if the speed is increased. Ile added that he wow it
urge the Commissioners to Look at west Oak as I ,elghboriroo!
ant not as a corridor.
Ms. Brack stated that she did see an advantage to slower
speeds.
Mr. Engelbrecht said that he had a problem with dual site
parking an a street that is narrow. He said that he doesn't
understand why it is necessary to build a street with park-
ing on both sides. He is kd the only advantage would be to
slow down the speed of drivers.
Ms. Riker stated that Mr. Stuart made reference to speeding
and she felt It would not make a dlffetence but agreed that
some consistency should be shown with both streets. She
added that she felt parking should be on only one silt of
the street.
MS. Bruck stated that consistency WAS hard to maintain with
a school In the area.
Mr. Svehla commented that one tree on Avenue G would have to
be removed.
Mr. Cochran stated that consistency is not in parking but in
whether the street should be one way to two ways.
Dixie Stevenson, 1920 W. Oak, stated that the speed is bad
now and she felt that if the speed limit was lowered to 20
mph it would help. She said that she wanted to keep the
existing footprint. Ms. Stevenson added that the exit for
Oak Street from I•SS does not lead to Oak Street.
Ms. Riker asked if the city could have lanes Eros 1.75 Lead
to Oak when exited from I.55 and lanes that would also lead ,
k to Hickory Street when exited. Mr. Svehla said yes, a sign
on I•SS states that the Oak Street exit will take you
t downtown.
f ~
Ms. Brock ■oveJ to recommend approval to the City Comicil t
that the policy statement be att&ched to the Thoroughfare J
Plan, Motion died for lack of a second.
A woman from the audience stated that she has lived In
Denton for 70 years and feels there should be two way J
traffic all the way through on Oak and Hickory Streets.
Ms. track slated that possibly In the future the Commission
could 5onslder It,
Mr. Holt stated that In order to widen Oak Street, between
Miller Road and gonnle Iru , the trees would hart to tray
and the City would have to Widen the South side of Oak
Street,
Mt. Svehla stated that it was a possibll" >rtt it would I
have to be taken to City Council.
Mr. Holt asked that it the Comalsslon voted an the last
motion, the It Citr Council would sttil make the final
decision, Mr. Robbins said yes.
Mr. Holt stated that Hickory Street did not bother him, it
was Oak Street being three to tour feet off a front yard
that would change the looks of the area.
Mr. Engelbretht moved to recommend approval of the policy
statement with a change in item 1S to read:
I S) In addition to the travel lams, puking an oak and
Hickory Streets should be allowed on one side.
I
I ~
I
I
y
3
+e ,
- l'S, uenut~s
~o vember SG, t?t9
Pile ?
Seconded by Mr. Holt.
• There was a conflict in the audience and people present
stated that they were invited to cone and give their Input
but felt the Commission was not listening to their veiw--
points.
Ms. Stock stated that she requested that those who lived in
the area be present in order for the Commission to receive
information from those that lived In the area. She apol-
ogized for living the wrong inpresslcn, but said that the
Commission needed to decide what was best for the City, is a
whole, as well.
Mr. Halt stated that be was worried about the extension on
the southsLde. He said he would rather keep the area "as
is" with parking on one side than both sides with the road
extended or, the south side.
fls, Stock stated that If the Commies Lon made a
recommenda- tion to the City Council to have pparklnl on one side of the
street there would be parking ptoblems in the future.
Mr. Glasscock stated that he felt parking would be better on
one side of the street. He sold that he was In favor of the
motion on the floor.
Mr. Holt withdrew his second to the motion to recommend
acceptance of the policy statement with the correction In
i item 13.
Mr. Glasscock seconded Mr, Engelbrecht's motion with the
change in item 13.
i
Ms, Brock stated that she felt parking on both sides would
slow down traffic and would eacoursse walking.
Mr. lawman asked if the Commission could recommend parking
on one side for certain hours only. Mr. Robbins said yes,
though the City Council would make the final decision.
i
Char called a rota to the motion and the motion [ailed
(1.4). Ms. Morgan,-Mr. limit, Ms. Stock, and Mr, lawman
voted no,
Mr. Svehla stated that tt would so to City Council without a
recommendation from the Coamisslon it needed.
Ms. $rock moved to recommend approval of the policy state-
ment as originally stated and to have it Attached to the
Thorou11bh n plan, Seconded by Ms. Morgan and motion
Carried'(8.1), Mr. En S4 brecht rated no.
Y. Director's Report
Mr. Robbins riled to pan an his report.
Meeting adjourned SAS p.m.
l
161?a
F6. N:nutee
October :o, 19d9 ~ '
Page
the staff has also provided the Commission with infor-
mation in conjunction with an earlier toning request.
The research Indicates that
[h there was a fire at one plant
i at resulted to an evacuation.
AEBUTTAL: Mr, Jester Jr, stated Safety-Aleen has lilt had
any sp is and [here were no employees that were com-
plaintng of breaching problems. He said that they nave
not stated whether they would condemn the water well or
not.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
I
DECISION: Mr. Glasscock stated that he understood that
tKe expansion would be for )us[ a warenouse and no
chemicals would be recycled in the new portion.
Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of Z•08.020
with the condition stated by staff. Seconded by
l Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (6.0) for
r approval.
IV. Consider Asking a recommendation on Article 17, Signs, of
h Appendix b, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances.
Mr. Holt moved to table the consideration of the sign
ordinance until the November 9, 1988 meeting. Seconded by
Ms. Riker and unanimously carried (6-0).
Y, Consider an amendment to the Denton Development Plan to add a
note on the Thoroughfare Plan about the widths and parking on
Oak and hickory Streets.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Robbins stated that the Is tie in the
memo tat vas on the Commissioner's desks were different from
l what they received !n their packets. He stated that, on the
f new memo, deleted words were crossed out and additional words
were underlined.
i
Mr. Robbins stated that at the time that the packets were
pasted out to the Commissioner's, he was not aware of the
three travel lanes of traffic on part of Hickory Street. He
said that was the most substantial change (roe the document
that was in the Coaissioner's packets.
the
am endeent to
Mr. nsttheahistoric e district nalnOak approval and
protect Hickory Streets as well as other homes outside the district.
Mr. Clark added that the area was not affected by the CIF
project.
Mr. Robbins stated that to clarify Mr. Clark's statement, the
area between Welch Street and south Carroll Boulevard Is not
part of the construction activity in the City's CIP project.
he said that It was in the area that the policy would apply.
The ppolicy would apply to Hickory and Oak Streets between
BOnnle Bra and Carroll Boulevard.
4 Mr. Holt asked if this area of the street would not be paved.
I Mr. Clark maid that the only part affected by the C1P pro-
f jest, In the historical district, Is on Oak Street between
f Carroll Boulevard and Welch Street. Hickory Street, between
Carroll Boulevard and Welch Street is not affected.
Mr. Glasscock asked If there was parking on both sides of Oak
Street, Mr. Clark said that It varies with the location.
me, Holt asked whet wider than the footprint was.
! Mr. Robbins stated that if the policy is adopted, the
footprints would be wider vAere labeled "wider" than the
I existing footprint to accommodate what was said at An earlier
meeting,
Mr. Holt stated thst the Commission's recommendation was to
keep the existing footprint.
I,
it
I
5.
k
II` l
I
1
Pa: ktnutes
,(r
~~ctuoer :o, IJ53
Page d
E
yr. Robbins Said tnat there would be a problem it, built
according to the policy, there are liability issues asso•
elated with building a substandard street to allow on-street
parking and the two travel lanes. He said that staff would
not recommend to do something that which the city may have
some liability.
Mr. Holt asked it there was a liability if nothing was done.
Mr. Robbins Said ne did not think so.
Ms, kikev stated that maybe the Commission should table the
clicles or make a motion since the conversation was going In
Mr. Holt asked if the Commission could postpone the discus-
sloe until the nest meeting, the Coamission agreed.
Yt. Director Report,
IL 1
Meeting adjourned at 8:0S p.m.
f ,
I 4
li +
i
i ~
1
ll
i
i
r~
I
i
Y4: Ntnu:es ~ -
SepteIoer '1, 1399
Page t
G
stated reg Alch, Paul Untpplcker Company, 8700 Stemmons Lallas,
lntegrltyaoftthepnelghborhoodesoethatnsmal,tlotslvfijn no~e
be located across from large lots.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Ms. Brack stated that sometimes people who aren't involved
In development don't realize that there are aPfortunities
to actually improve developments and make them less dense,
LEr,IS10gt Mr• Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
16-OJ,
Seconded by Mr. ham man and unanimously carried
lY. Considerations
A• Consider a plan to remove protected trees along Hickory
a
STAFF nd Oak streets in conjunction with street improvements.
Was held: Mr,
I n Svehla stated that a neighborhood meet.
n tias held to recelye Input and guidance. There were a
b
sustantial number of people concerned with the trees.
free Preservation Ordinance requires that the The
commission
If the streany tree Co
s that will be affected by CIp projects
trees will ,
et is widened into o a 37 foot section, seven
need to be remove and possibly another three
t nfftcestandpoint,sultiu tai Looking at Oak Street from a
be needed, This is consistent withethenDevelopmentiPlan-
however, the people who live on Oak Street do not want it
changed. Staff recommends that Oak Street be widened to a
37 foot section with two lanes for one way trafile and two
the tffic
conflhe uraton alternative is to leave
neighbors, A few trees ■f ht still be effecte d by the
y the
improvements anyway,
Ns. Brock asked if a new curb and gutter will be installed,
Nt. Svehla said vas. There are drainage problems and new
Pipes will be needed. Existing facilpoor
condition. As ■ucA ities are In work As possible will b e done
Working around the trees.
Ns, Brack asked how the drainage improvements will be
effected it the street retains I
Of varying widths. It
present configuration
kr, Svehla said that the Job would not be easier if the
- ate enot t width$ are not changed. Norailly lateral movements
Bch of problem but it Wf11 be more difficult to
match up with the driveways. Ms. Brack stated that there has been a Iot of discussion
about the ultimate plans for Oak Street.
Mr. Svehla said that the existing widths will be
In places to create the ultimate cuplets. too narrow
Ns. Brock asked what would be the maximum load foe Oak and
Hickory Streets under the transportation plan,
Mr- Svehla said that it is hard to determine,
e
1 now lA used as main routes in and out of the Univer Thsityaof
{ wilxas, There is no way to predict What load they
VKFe actually be a rryin In A few years but the University
expects to grow and dove fopaent Is expected at tAe west end
1 Of Oak Street, The transportation plan shows o
Hickory as the ak and
main route to this development area West of
I-3S and to the University.
Ms. Brock asked what the streets could Potentially carry if
destined as a cuplet.
I
I
I
s
t
F;. ~iizu!es
September :o, 1199 i
Page S
Mr. Svehla stated that two lanes can carry 22,000 to 24,0Cv
vehicles, three lanes can carry 24,000 to 34,000. Tne
oneway _uplets are more efficient.
Mr. Holt asked the goal of the presentation to the
Commission.
Mr. Svehla stated that the tree preservation ordinance
states that the Commission must determine wnether of not
protected trees are being unnecessarily removed in
conjunction with CIP projects.
Mr. Holt asked what kind of trees are proposed for removal.
Mr. Svehla said at least three oak trees. Two of which are
in the historic district.
Mr. Holt stated that if a 37 foot street section is
_ approved, the possibility is opened for three lanes of
traffic one-way. He asked where people would park.
Mr, Svehla stated that no one has suggested changing the
traffic pattern. The City would have the option of doing
so in later years if desired. He said that the Historic
Landmark Commission and the City Council will also be
considering this request.
Ms. Brock stated that this Is the third meeting on the
issue that she has attended. The first was a work session
with the Council when the 37 feet were agreed upon. The
second was the meeting with the neighborhood. She said
that at the last Council meeting, it was suggested that a
transportation committee be formed. This project is very
much a transportation issue. Enrollment at the University
of North Texas is growing. This may mean that larger i
streets are needed. Ms. Brock stated that she is going to
recommend that staff be directed to prepare a policy to be
attached to the Thoroughfare Plan stating that oak and
Hickory retain the existing traffic pattern and any changes
would require public hearings. The neighborhood needs this J
protection. The historic district is new and ao parking
with high speed traffic would be a detriment. She said
that she is also concerned about the University and that
sometime in the near future the Citrr needs to work with the
University officials about access, Eike paths, the safety i
of students, etc. She said that she does not think that
having Oak and Hickory as major thoroughfares is necessary
to the development of the high intensity area west of town.
George Stewart, 2003 M. Oek, stated that he is president of
the property owners association between Avenue C and Bonnie
Brae. fie said that he agrees with Its. Brock and endorses
her proposal.
Mike Cochran, 009 W. Oak, stated that he also agreed with
Ms. Brock's statements. He stated that the issue Is bigger
than the trees but he appreciates the staff's concern for
tree preservation. He said that a boulevard through the
historic district is not good for Denton even though it may
make sense to traffic engineering. He said that the Histor-
ic Landmark Commission voted to oppose the widening of Oak
Street and recoaaends that Oak and Hickory have two way
traffic. This recommendation should be seriously consid-
ered. The cost would not be great and would preserve the
neighborhood. He urged that Oak Street at least remain as
it is. a'idening the street to 37 feet would be a disaster
because it would became too easy to make the street three
lanes one way. The residents would have no sound arguments
against it other than emotional reasons.
I
h
l
4
4
F:. ~itnitei
eFtemcar :i, lvi3
Page b
Murray Ricks, 705 W. Oak, stated that he lived on Stanley
Street prior to moving to Oak Street. When the drainage
was upgraded cn Stanley and Thomas Streets, pipe vas put in
the middle of the street and curb and gutter was removed as
needed. The home owners lawns and trees were undisturbed.
The existing footprint of the street was left in tact.
Mr. Ricks suggested doing this type of improvement on Oak
Street as in alternative to the current proposal. Drop
inlets could be installed as necessary but the main pipes
could be down the center of the road.
Mr. Svehla stated that the bond issue voted or, by the
citizens requires that Oak Street be rebuilt. 80 • 90
percent of Oak Street is in poor condition. It may be
possible to save some of the curb but the street is buckled
and needs to be rebuilt. Mr. Svehla stated that he would
not feel comfortable recommending that the street only be
repaved. If the curbs are in good enough shape, the City
will leave them in place. The majority of the curbs are in
bad shape and will need to be replaced to facilitate better
drainage.
Ms. Brock stated that if oak Street is left at its existing
width. It will have to be down graded to a collector street
on the thoroughfare plan.
Mr. Svehla stated that when a transportation committee is
appointed, that issued could be considered.
Joyce Palmer, 19DS W. Oak, stated that she is disturbed
that the City is not taking the residents who live on the
street into account. Improving the capacity of Oak Street
will seriously effect the quality of life. She said that
University Drive and Eagle are better suited for carrying
large traffic loads. Extra traffic on Oak Street would
effect all the residents of the historic district and the
surrounding neighborhood adversely.
Pete Gunter, 225 Jagoe, stated that his family is from
Gainesville which has s historic district. Their district
is an attraction to people and enhance$ the city for the
residents. It attracts business as well. The Denton
historic district is smaller than Gainesville's and if a
freeway is run through it, It will be worthless, If
Denton's airport and the surrounding area are developed,
people will not hop off the planes and rush down Hickory
Street to get to the Mini-Mall. The nistoric district is
somethin of value and should be preserved for at least
another ~ecade.
Ms. Morgan stated that she is in favor of preserving the
historic district as Is, except for necessary repairs.
Mr. Svehla stated that portions of Oak and Hickory Streets
are aS feet wide. He asked if the Commission would like
` these sections narrowed down to 37 feet or left to the
f existing width. 37 foot would still leave room for a
parking lane. He said that Fry Street will only be rebuilt
between Oak and Hickory Streets.
DECISION: Mr. Holt moved that no trees be removed from oak
and Hickory Streets.
Mr. Glasscock said that there are some dead trees in the
rt`ht-of-way that should be removed. He asked if the
sidewalks will be redone.
Mr. Svehla said yes and that the dead trees would be
removed, He pointed out that there are few living trees
that may be affected by the improvements even if the
existing footprint of the street is followed. It depends
on the root systems of the trees. Staff WIN consult with
John Cooper, the County Agriculture Extension Officer,
about the trees,
i3: nut es
September :B,
Page
Motion was seconded by Mr. Kamman and unanimously carried
Ms. Brack moved that staff prepare a policy statement trait
says Oak Street will have no more than two lanes of traffic
plus parking, with the traffic pattern to remain as it is,
and no parking will be removed in any area. This policy
would be attached to the thoroughfare plan in the Denton
[evelopment Plan. Seconded by Mr. Holt and unanimously
tried (6.0).
9. Make a recommendation on preliminary replar of Lots 1-23
to Lots 1R-16R and Lots 42.43 to Lots 42R-SIR, Block 3,
The Woodlands of Township 11.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Evans stated that the preliminary replat
a ots - to Lots lR-16R and Lots 42-45 to Lots 42A-ilR,
Block A. The Woodlands of Township 11, is being done in
conjunction with the toning case heard earlier in the
evening. The property is toned PO-6 and single-family
development Is anticipated,
DECISION: Mr. lamman moved to recommend approval of the
pre m nary replat of Lots 1.23 to Lots 1R-16R and Lots
42.43 to Lots 42R-SIR, Block A, The Woodlands of Township
[I. Seconded by Ms. Morgan appnd u d nafee nim for carried (6-0).
C nonresidential zoning 4s trlctswhereresidentialuses
exist,
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Evans stated that she had Informed the
Commission a few meetings ago that the City proposed a
system to initiate downtoning in some areas, The
Commission needs to look at some existing land uses that
are currently toned for higher intensity uses. Under the
cuaaslative coning law, residential structures in nonresi-
dential districts will not be allowed to rebuild if over SO
percent of the structure is destroyed and they also cannot
do additions. The Commission might want to consider a
reduction of one-half of the current fees of 1600.00 for
five acres or less and $1,100 for more than five acres.
Other options are to have no fee at all or to have no fee
for downxoning properties in the noit•cummalative toning
district and,then one-half or some other fee for properties
that are general downxoning cases from one residential use
stated the option fire one-half
Ms. Evans recommends
fees, Staff
property
current another
owners from Southridge currently toned for nonresidential
,ices present at the meeting. The existin land use is
two•faatly and the property is deed restr~clad for resi-
dential uses. She stated the cuamalativelnon-cumsalative
ordinance becomes effective January 1919 to prevent build-
ing new residential units in a non-residential district.
The ordinance was approved because there was a problem with
r ople building multi family units In industrial districts.
P esa uses were unantlelpated and the infrastructure we%
i not In place. Several residents of the neighborhood could
bring in a request together and split the fees.
Mr. Holt asked If dovnioning would solve the problem of
the people being able to add on or rebuild if necessary.
Ms. Evans said yes.
Mr. Holt asked if the people will have to go through the
regular toning process. Ms. Evans said yes.
Fred Vaughan, 306 Holly Hill, stated that the development
he resides in was approved lypg years ago. The City has now
residents. Theiresidentseshoulernottbetaskedutoacorrecche i
somethin`` that is not their fault. The property is now
unsellable.
r
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
December 12, 1988
The regular meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission was
held on Monday, December 12, 1988 at 4:00 p.m., in the Civil
Defense Room of the Municipal Building, Denton, Texas.
Present: William Barker, Mike Cochran, Bullitt Lowry, Tom
Miller,and Janet Shelton
Absent: Judith Abbott, Catherine Conrady, Gaylen Fickey,
Richard Hayes, and William Hansbury
Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for
Planning and Development; Elizabeth Evans, Planninq
Administrator,, Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney;
and Olivia Carson, Secretary
c
f Chairman Cochran called the meeting to order.
! 1. Minutes
I
Mr. Miller suggested that staff check on the boundaries
of the East Denton neighborhood to be sure the minutes
are accurate.
s Mr. Lowry stated that the motion on page 6, paragraph 12
Is worded awkwardly. He said the motion should read "Mr. 1
Lowry moved to recommend Mr Ha es's suggestion that Oak "
Street not be widened. Similarly, Hickory should not be
widened between Carroll and Welch and Hickory should be
changed to no more than two travel lanes and two
on-street parking lanes." 1
Ms, Shelton stated that page 7, paragraph 2 says that she
left the meeting. She said that she did not leave and
participated in the vote supporting the Jones Farm
concept making the vote (7.0? initead of (6.0) in
paragraph S, page 7.
Mr, Robbins stated that he would get a copy of the
recommendation to Planning and Zoning that was based on
Mr. Lowry's motion. '
The Commission decided to proceed with another item as
people were present to discuss it and come back to the
discussion on the recommendation later in the meeting.
3
I
i
Historic Lindm3rk :onmiiiion
December 12, 1988
Page 2
After discussing the possible renaming of Pockrus Road,
the Commission agreed to resume their discussion on the
Oak/Hickory Street recommendation and minutes. Mr.
Robbins presented them with a copy of the recommendation
that staff presented to the Planning and Zoning
Commission based on their motion at the November 14, 1988
meeting.
Mr. Lowry stated that item l of the recommendation was
accurate but item 2 could be phrased to more accurately
reflect the desires of the Historic Landmark Commission.
He said that item 2 of the recommendation should read as
follows:
Hickory Street from Carroll Boulevard to Welch Street
should not be widened. It should be changed to allow
two travel lanes and on-street perking on both sides
of Hickory Street or bike lanes from Carroll to
Welch. Hickory Street from Welch to Bonnie Brae
should be no wider than allowing two travel lanes and
on-street parking or bike lanes.
j Mr. Lowry said that the Commission's intent is to
discourage traffic on these streets.
Mr. Cochran stated that according to Jerry Clark, the
City Engineer, making traffic two-way will not affect the
amount of traffic on the streets, but it will have an
impact on the intersection at Carroll Blvd.
Mr. Miller said that two-way traffic seems to go slower
than one-way traffic.
Mr. Robbins stated that staff has interpreted the motion
that the Commission made on making Oak and Hickory
two-way traffic as a recommendation that the possibility
of two-way traffic on those streets be studied, Staff
will let the Council know that the Commission wants the
idea studied. A consultant will probably be hired to do
the study but not until after the policy for the streets
has been adopted and a decision made on the
reconstruction of the streets.
Mr. Morris arrived at the meeting.
j Mr. Lowry stated that he would like the way he reworded
the staff recommendation to the Planning and Zoning
Commission to be substituted as the wording for the
motion on page 6, paragraph 12. He moved acceptance of
the minutes of the regular meeting of November 14, 1988
as amended. Seconded by Ms. Shelton and unanimously
carried (S-0).
I
I
HLC Minutes
November 14, 1988
Page S
Ms. Ross pointed out that the lot at 1122 East Sycamore is in
the flood plain. Federal funds for the renovation of tho
house would not be available unless it 1s moved. The lot is
also slated to become part of a new park.
Mr. Ellie.on said that demolition could be delayed on the house.
Ms. Evans stated that someone could buy the house privately at
a foreclosure sale.
Ms. Moore stated that the Parks Department is interested in
the lot itself.
tohat
tihe demolition stated will that lethe ast citizens
be i delayed. Theye may informed
help.
Ms. Shelton said that there are other older houses in the area.
Ms. Moore said that the vacant houses have vagrants living n
them. They often start fires in the winter and the neighbors
are concerned.
Mr. Miller moved that the Commission look at the 10 houses
slated for demolition prior to the next meeting. Seconded by
Mr. Lowry and unanimously carried (9-0).
Mr. Lowry asked that the chairman be sent a list of the
buildings and informed of the motion.
Ms. Ross, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Ellison, and Ms. Moore left the meeting.
It, Discuss and consider the Oak and Hickory Street Project.
Mr. Hayes stated that he is concerned abiut limiting on-street
parking for multi-family developments. That is where it is
probably most needed. He also said that Hickory Street from
Carroll Boulevard to Welch Street should not be widened. No
more than two lanes of traffic and two lanes of on-street
pparking should be allowed. He said that Oak Street should not
be widened at all.
Mr. Hayes left the meeting.
{ The Commission considered plans for rebuilding Oak Street.
Ms. Evans asked l residents
street# The issue wasnotaddressed at nparking on both sides of
neighborhood
meetln Ms. Abbott said that she would like to see two lanes
of traffic and one parking lane.
Mr. Lowry asked why the size of the lanes have increased from
CommMlon's back-uplwasM prepared byasomeonetelse.memo In the
i
HLC Minutes
November her 14, 1988 DRAFT
Ms. Evans stated that 12 feet is the ideal site for a travel
lane.
Mr. Barker stated that the footprint of Oak Street should not
be changed.
Mr. Clark stated that the traffic movements on Oak Street have
been watched. Changing the curbs will not allow someone to go
faster, but will hopefully prevent some accidents, A 12 foot
lane includes a foot and one-half of gutter. People don't
drive in them. They will park in them.
Mr. Barker asked the speed limit on Oak Street. Mr. Clark
said 50 miles per hour.
Mr. Barker said that there are no speed limit signs.
Mr. Lowry stated that he is concerned about changing the
connection between the Historic District and the rest of the
project. He said that Oak Street should not be widened
1 between Carroll and Bonnie Brae.
Ms. Abbott stated that guttering is needed along Oak near
Avenue G.
I
Mr. Lowry moved to recommend that Oak Street should not be
widened between Bonnie Brae and Carroll except for guttering
at the intersection with Avenue G. Motion died for lack of
second.
Mr. Clark stated that the plan for Oak Street through the
Historic District calls for the elimination of the existing
jog and a small widening of the intersections to impprove the
turning radius. The hump w111 be taken out of the inter-
section at Mounts Street. No trees will be removed. The
sidewalks will not be upgraded.
Mr. Lowry stated that he does not want traffic to go any
faster through the area,
Mr. Clark said that the drive is unsafe if a car stops in
front of another one. The turning radii are not a major
problem but the City would like to widen them to a common,
standard si:e.
11 Mr. Lowry moved to recommend Mr. Hayes's suggestion that Oak
street not be widened nor Hickory between Carroll and Welch
and that would be changed to no more than two travel lanes and
two on-street parkir,4 lanes. Seconded by Ms. Shelton and
unanimously carried k,-0),
Mr. Clark stated that Hickory between Welch and Carroll will
not be redone because it was not part of the bond election.
I
r"
9
` tiLC Minutes AAFT
Noveaber lj, 1988 Page 7 Mr. Barker emphasized that the new curb radii were not to be
approved.
Ms, Shelton and Mr. Clark left the meeting.
Mr. Miller stated that traffic people naturally have the urge
to widen lanes.
E Mr. Lowry clarified that curb excavation would be over the
current footprint and the motion was meant to retain the J
current width. He said that the motion was meant for the 11
entirety of Oak Street.
IV. Consider recommending support for the Jones Farm concept.
Mr. Lowry stated that there will be a tour of the Jones Fare
on November 30, 1988. Mr. Cochran can be contacted for more
details. Senator Glassgow has come out in favor of Jones
Farm. A motion of support 4ro■ the Commission would be
helpfu►. The Jones Form is located within the Lake Ray
Roberts area. It is a workin farm on a historical and
archeolo ically significant s~te. The Texas Department of
Parks an~ Wildlife wants to fund a living farm. This is one
of the sites being considered. Numerous groups are inter-
ested in the project. He moved that the Commission support
the concept and recommend pursulni It further. Seconded by
Mr. Miller and unanimously came (6.0).
V. New Business
Ms. Evans stated that a petition has been received to change 1
the name of Pockrus Road. She asked the Commission Is they 1
would like to have a special meeting to consider additional
agenda items. ,
Mr. Lowry suggested beginning the December meeting at an
earlier time.
The Commission agreed on the suggestion. Ms. Evans said that
she would send a notice asking the Commissioners to arrange
their schedule so that'attendance would be possible.
Meeting adjourned at 6:20.
1
1579x J
4 I
i
I
IE
!,ir:4te~
ti is to rIC Ldnomat K um-ml,s1u,
ory;tuber 1:, lYeb
Tue regul■r wetting of the historic Lanamatk Lommis siou of the lty
of Lentou. Texas, was neid on Sep terho er l2, lvbk, at 5:OU y,m, in
tie civil Let en se noun cf the Municipal builaiug.
Present, dud Itn Abbott, William Barker, Mlke Cochran,
I 1
Cathtrlne Conrady, Caylrn Fickey, kicnard rrayes,
Sullitt Lowry. Tom Miller, Ana Janet Shelton
Abseut: William Hanscury
Present from Staff: Elizabetn Evans, Planning Adainistrator;
Jot Morris, Assistant City Attorney; Jerry Clara,
City EnSineer; and Olivia Carson, Secretary
i
Chairman Mike Cochran called the meeting to order.
i~
1. New business
onsideration of proposal to widen Oak and hickory streets
i
and remove protected trees
Mr. Ciark stated that tae City is still in the data gathering
stake. Preliminary arawings have been done and the CCity
Council has expresses its approval. The pruJect Invoives
oak Street be wren Carroll and bonnie Brae, RHickory Street
between Welch and Bonnie Brae, and Fry Street between Oak
and Scripture. The ingineering Lepartment is Aware of the
Historic District, There are a lot of issues in relation to
trees. The Engineering Department Is planning for the least
effect on the environment. The City Council supports widen-
Ing Oak Street to 37 feet with an 11 toot travel lane and an
eight foot parkin iane. The existing configuration will not
be changed. The flow of traffic will continue in the same
currently, If the street is made any narrower then it 1
way as
would be hard to travel through. The Cou lesion's suggestions
are volcume. Red line drawings are available for review in r
the Engineering Department, itldehing the street to 11 feet
will require the removal of some trees but the street will be
weaved wherever Rossible.
Mr. Miller asked the objective of the widening. +
Mr. Clark said that the streets have deteriorated and were
approved in a bond election to De upgraded,
Mr. Miller asked why Oak is being widened. 1
Mr. Clark said that it is an inconsistent width and widening
it will give the City the option of making It three lane in
0e future.
Mr. Lowry asked if there is a possibility of making Oak and
Hickory two-way in order to discourage traffic. He asked
about letting Eagle, Univirslty, And Scripture/Congress carry
the traffic loads.
Mr. Clark said that he is willing to consider the possibility.
I There would be the same need to widen Scripture.
Mr. Hayes asked when the street study was done.
Mr. Clark said that street studies are in on-going pprocess.
The staff rates the streets for the amouat of deterioration.
He said that an original thoroughfare study was done in 1911.
I
~ j
III
E
I
HL(. MLnutes
September 1:, 1968
Page 2
I
The Land Use Planning Committee changed the T`nroulhfare Plan
in 1986. This project is consistent with the approved plan
by the LUPC.
Mr. Cochran asked the cost of repaving,
Mr Clark said f3•5 per square foot, $ly if curbs and gutters
.
included,
streets t to be the d
ection called costs for the lot to
rebuilt.
The bond el
Mr. Hayes stated that he was a member of the LUPC and he
l always understood that Oak and Hickory wr:e to remain In
r their present condition.
Ms. Abbott asked if Fry would be widened.
f Mr. Clark said no.
Ms. Shelton asked if there are plans to widen Bonnie arse.
Mr. Clark said yes.
Mr, Fickey asked if the traffic on University has decreased
in the last few years.
Mr, Clark said that It has increased.
Mr. Fickey asked if the lights will eventually be
1 synchronized.
Mr Clark said yes. it is a complicated project and is
r being computerlted.
Mr. Cochran said that synchronising the lights on University
a need nto get. He o to three asked one-way ere
s ho Id hasu been e any t Indication c of off O
` lanes on Oak and Hickory streets.
Mr. Clark said no. The new pavement will last 20.25 years.
The Commission is welcome to look at the preliminary drawings.
Zoning wCommibe a ssionmetg discussion on of the Septombeieli, at 1961e Planning and
Hr. Barker asked if the Council had to approve the project.
Mr. Cochran stated that the Council has already approved the
widening to 37 feet.
Mr. Lowry moved that the Historic Landmark Commission
authorise the Chairman to: 1) remind the Planning and
zoning commission and City Council that by their policy,
I discussions regarding the Oak-Hickory Historic District
hive previously coma before the HLC, 2) the HLC strongly
tecommends that no widening be done volt of Avenue C, and
+ 3) the HLC recommends that Oak and Hickory become two•wa •
i He said these actions are to maintain integrity by t e
historic district as previously app
Ms. Conrady.
notlfiodr of thed prohat posale torlletslon should have been
be
the Councltteembersaandtthey hadcsaiddnohwidenings would with
done.
Mr. Miller stated that he would prefer that the motion only
be about the width of the streets. Whether they are two-way
or not could be considered later.
I
HLc, Minutes
September it. ls88
Page S
Mr. Hayes stated that being two-way would slow the traffic
down and make It safer and more convenient for the residents.
Mr. Cochran said that repaving alone would Increase the speed
of traffic on the street.
Ms. Abbott stated that increasing traffic will be a detriment
to the district. Cutting down trees will not be an Improve-
ment. The property values and quality of life in the district
will be adversely affected.
Roll call vote;
Ms. Abbott - aye
Mr. Barker - a
Mr. Cochran -aye
bfs. Conrady - aye
Mr. Fickey - aye
Mr. Hayes - aye
Mr. Lowry - aye
Mr. Miller - aye
Ms. Shelton - aye
' Motion carried unanimously (9.0).
Mr. Hayes asked if the Commission could be advised of
anything affecting the historic district.
Mr. Cochran sold that the Commission should also be advised
j of impending demolitions. He said that he had heard that the
Chamber of Commerce Is also against the w(denin of Oak Street
because it Is a needless expense. The issue wliI also be
addressed by the Denton Historical Society, Denton County
storical Commission, and Beautification Task force agendas.
11. Minutes
Ms. Abbott stated that page 3, paragraph 10 should read
"...the Main Building at TWU is worth noting". She said
that Palo S, Pert t+ph 1 should read "The house on Scripture
may be ought by It. David's Church and might be scheduled
for eventual demolition. In the past, Grace Teeple wanted
to buy the house on the northeast corner of Fulton, Oak, and
Gregg with the idea..." She also said that page 6, para-
grayyh l should read -'Ms. Abbott speculated that the church
alght reasonably plan to eventually build a sanctuary..."
Mr. Miller stated that pole 6, part raph Z should read
" ,.the fraternity wouldn t remove the second floor room
from the porch because..."
Ms. Conrady stated that page 6, paragraph 1S should read
"7he Commission needs an ordinance con calling demolitions"
She also said that page 7, pFarm raph 11 should read "historic
districts should be items tftat ~nspire pride, not mediocrity".
1 It was moved by Mr. Hayes and seconded by Ms. Shelton to
approve the minutes of August 1, 1911, as corrected. Motion
carried unanimously (0.0).
III. Discussion of Certified Local Government Program with
Dwayne Jones, Preservation Planner, Texas Historical
Commission
Mr. Jones stated that the Certified Local Government Program
was crested by the Park Service to help states fund preserva-
tion activities, texas began its pro ram in 191S. Beaumont
was the first town to be certified. Corpus Christi is the
latest, Every state has options about the creation of its
program, Texas has now made counties eligible for certifi-
cation. The State office must pass on 10 percent of the
I
I
384
~itY :I .sntan City Council .mInutas
!!eeting or Novemaer 19d6 +
page Seventeen 1
SICTIGN i, r The
the November lap 198'citooto M00:111 D-Dayninn thete"t d
Ile
City Of Denton, Texas, on Drugs
ltuinedt~e
SECTION It.
That the aitirens or the City of 6encon, Texas participate
in out 9081 Of A drug-free City and a drug-Iree America.
SECTION lLI.
That this tatolutlon 1 ell become of fact eve lAmediataly
upon Its ;4831194 and approval.
i
PASSIU ANU APPROVED this the 4th say of Novgmt#r, 19d6.
R bT Pk Ndp A
CI%Y Of DENTON, TEXAS
i ATTL51i
I `'~Ji11~fr9 A'L~Z~;-~ sauxc rr
CITY Gl DENUS, T1XAd
APPROVEu AB TO LCGAL rvR.11
DEBRA ADAMI DAAYOVITCN, CITY ATTGANEY
k CITY OY DENTON, 19XAS
I Sys
+ Chow motion, Altotd second that the resolution be approved. un roll
call Votes MOAdass• •sye,• Alexander 'sye,• Hopkins 'aye,' Alfora
unanimouslya aye, and mayor Stephens 'aye.' motion carried
T• The Council W41ive0 a report on the following miscei-
Igneous matters tram the City Manager,
City Manager Lloyd Harrell reported that trenspettation would be
$411,140 on INOYefber il. M Thosee Interestsd shoutEl meet gins the raCIVIC
Center parking lot at 1100 a.m. and the group would return to Denton
around 1170 P.M.
Fouts posalblo dates had been offered by the City's auditors for a
tai 8e111914t. The Council decided on TNesdayp NOYembar ISth at
silo p.m. in the City Council Chambers,
Bartell concluded by reported that at the 01004 the the City'$
finan imstelooks, the general revenues exceeded expenditures oy
Y 0194,060.
' 10 Nov Business
No Items of new bnalnesm were suggested by C044CLI Members
tot future agendas,
The Council then considered agenda Itsm 11 which had boon aeiayea
F due to time Constraints.
L The Council considered giving staff direction regarding
engineering work on the Oak-Mickoty street improvealent project.
c
had ityoManade Lloyd until kat t lL After ed eu~~ t' t the Hickory Street assign 1
Other project$ would be stetted in the In949 terim. unCThe a design u element
I
1
1
_1
:wnc.n :LCy :3 4M1C1 t yLn.;Is
welt trig sovesber 4, 1946
Pegs Eighteen
spoke to two suo;ectsr one was the long r.nge transport4tLOn :an
for tie City; which waild be vitally imrartant. hickory CO-410 to
designed to to one-way with couplets with one 31 as left rot on
strest parking at it could to left two- ay with ro parking. Staff
was presentLng foul alternativest
1. a width of 37 feat with 3 lanes one-way IrepresentLng
a savings of :70,000?
2. a width of 37 to 45 feet with 3 lanes one-way ano
patking on 1 lane (rep neenting a uvLnys of $50,00u)
3. a width of 45 feet with 3 lanes one-way with parking
on 1 side (representing a savings of $28,000)
4. 4 width of 45 feet with 2 lanes each way and perking
on both sides (representing no savings)
r~ $tarf was recommending alternate 13.
r
Chow motion, Alf Old seCO,ld to direct staff to ptCCe4d with the
enginoeting walk on the Oak-hickory street improvement pro3ett wLtn
alternative H. Motion carrlsd 5 to 1 with Council Msmbst MOAaams
trig the •May* vote.
9. SO Official action on Wkeautlve aeesicn items of Legal
matters, real estate, personnel ano/or baara appointments was taken,
14, She Council conv4ned LAU the fkeaytlve 2411tCA to OLecuea
legal matters, teal estate, personnel Ana/o9 board appointments. :.o
official action was taken.
With no furthot items of business, the meeting was add LLfned.
RAT i ab', M
~r
I
i
I
i
01!30
r,
F
1
1
LJEFIE=
Umm~
1
a
I ~
i
I
I I
i
-
,
4
S
' I
DATE: 03/07/89
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REPLAT OF AUDRA MEADOWS; FROM LOTS 25A THROUGH 26B AND
LOT 27, BLOCK At AND LOTS 20A ,'HROUGH 3490 BLOCK B INTO LOTS 25 AND
26, BLOCK A; LOTS 20 THROUGH 34, BLOCK B; AND LOTS 27 THROUGH 47,
BLOCK A.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval of this
preliminary replat at its meeting of February 22, 1989.
SUMMARY:
This is a two phased subdivision. The City Council approved the
Planned Development amendment from duplex lots and a multi-family {
lot to single family lots on February 21, 1989. This tract is
located west of Loop 288 and south of Audra Lane, in the N.F.A. i
P.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 927, Denton County, Texas.
BACKGROUND:
i
The property is zoned planned development and single family
residential development is anticipated,
i
City services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer,
telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available,
The entire plat, containing 7.403 acres, conforms to the minimum
requirements of the Dentun Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
Final plate will be submitted in phases. Since numerous street cuts
in Bayfieid Drive will be necessary for utility extensions to the
lots to be created in Phase II, street paving of Sayfield will be
accomplished with the final platting of Phase 11.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Petitioner only,
1)
J
L~j
i
r
~J
Audta Meadows
March 7, 1989
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT: y
None.
4Cy :fu ll eu m tied:
V. Ra rell
repa[ed by
anage[
h
0. Owen Yost, ASL,
Urban Planner
App[ i
Prank R. Aobbin I A1CP
executive Director for
plannLng and Development
I
1519k
I
I ~
if
j i
I
I
I
l
a
r
rj
f
~s
Audra Meadows
March 7, 1989
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
tted: 1
Res tfull eul
Prepared bid r Ha r ~ C V Manager
0. Oven Yost, ASL
Urban Planner
I
i ~ Appx v 4',
Frank H. Robbl , AICP
Executive Director for
Planning and Development ,
1519k
w
I
i
i ~
1
r
I
I
J
P ~
F
~ I
{
i
AUDRA MEADOWS"r
M
i
i
IT
A Oat LAN; I
1
I
i
1
i
i
tCALt DATt
k Aadl %ldl 1o'l
160 all
AURA lid.
=~-y^~I+•S., ,~a----- ; - LANE
w' 1
111 I I No
x fd 1 t...}tr
300.00
4 Y / M T. rl . \ ! !1 A T14 t
34 3 3
- . ~ f I t'. ,2 I
1.1 4 i
I
;I I doe 3
\ t .,,ti. bit N it 39 i N
301,j, f t v
l1i II J. ..~I wifid
4. Iil V M
29 1 Ali 360
1 f~ 1
V all 37 m
28
27
l t u i 26 i* 3s
110 ~ ' I i . ~i t « I I II
1
lid a
Am is
~JS
3{ , /It I 1' z] i^ Ill X32 i
f.. w 1 i..,F `til ~t
f~, I v I
it f 22 111 ]3 11
j
23 ' 30 it
f i tl
It i 1.....,.
vie 13
20 1 I i it
u ' I tl i.
l i I
J7~~ 604 1
1 to uLWIA Vrl_u f ,
D 1
Ila
` « t 2a
~r 1 tl ~x?rniz rr~ s : ~''w'^ ~
t y i $ rlo 1
I ' 11.
~p E 25 26
i.
- t yi! tY~lta 8 _ aln Ir/Ml'
2ss. a]•
vo-~J ravr>rr+
I,.u all "s C0,416
.a. wl• r/ to
PROPOSED PLAT
fA
1
Oak-Hickory Strut Petition
We the undersigned, residents of Denlon,Texas respectfully request the City Council to adopt
the following policies concerning the O,k and Hickory Street re-paving project:
1. To discourage dangerous high speed traffic through the university and adjacent 1
residential areas, retain the existing "foolprlnt' of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency.)
2. That the current traffic pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be retained. (lo; two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, one-way from Carroll to Jagoe)
3. That the current parking configuration be retained, (wlih the
the north side of Oak from Jagoo to Marietta), possible exception of
4. We urge the Council to take steps to protect the stability of the nelghborhood by
Insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffic lanes.
Name Address Phone #
0/1
I.
Q
)tl
2. o s' W Da4 J -~'fG o
3.
.4 %3
~
5. ~
6. 1010
- o$ C'LV ? fs -oSE~E~ 1
7. J00 Mar~ery~Q 302 -04 9
8' jtL M~rr •1tA 9r.G 11;
9• 3ia m G7e~d/~f i
1 of 4
13.
15. .a
16. 9// 9W-0.3 3
17.
7/1
f 18. ~eh~' 14 o lI
19. ZY 12
93-- 17 on
20. pa r 3~
21.
_ +.31
22.
23. a
25.
a
Oak-Hickory Street Petition
We the undersigned, residents of Denton Texas respectfully request the City Council to adopt
the following policies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street repaving project:
1, To discourage dangerous high speed traffic through the university and adjacent
residential areas, retain the existing "lootprinl" of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency.)
1
2. Thal the current traffic pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be !alalned. (to: two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, one-way from Carroll to Jagoe.)
3. That the current parking conligurallon be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4. We urge the Council to take steps to protect the stability of the neighborhood by
Insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffic lanes.
Name Address Phone #
~ 1.
i s i a 3
3. w. -iio S
4 - L
5.
,L
ezj
X-MAdt
6.
7. G 2~
9, '
1 c K I YU 0A' .
"I -I -R, M
13. .2! i cL
4,1
15.
16.
17.
18.
j 19.
20.
3
21.
22.
23.
24.
f 25.
1
,
Oak-Hickory Street Petition
We the undersigned, residents of DenlonlTexas respectfully request the City Council to adopt
the lollowing policies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street re-paving project:
To discourage dangerous high speed traffic through the university and adjacent
residential areas, retain the existing "foolprinl' of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency.)
2. That the current traffic pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be retained. (to; two.
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, one-way from Carroll to Jagoe.),
3. That the current parking configuration be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4. We urge the Council to lake steps to protect the stability of the neighborhood by
insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffic lanes.
Name Addross Phone
1. f't ~J
44 /3tf-z~' 2. 2 60' v
6. Zz o S W 1N s 5(a~,314fo
CA)
7.
8. , zips «Ju 7 ssz
9,
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15,
16.
17. _
18.
19.
20.
21.
i 22.
23.
24.
25.
i
I
Oak-Hickory Street Petition ~
We the undersigned, residents of Denton Texas raspecllulty request the City Council to edopl
the following policies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street re-paying
project.
I. To discourage dangerous high speed traffic through the university and adjacent
residential areas, retain the exlsrng 'foolprlnt' of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Uniess
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency.)
2. That the current traffic pattern or Oak and Hickory Streets be retained, (le; two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Bras, one-way from Carroll to Jagoe,)
3. That the current parking configuration be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4, We urge the Council to take steps to protect the stability of the neighborhood by
Insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffic lanes.
I I
~ Na e
1 Address Phone #
3, -37
4.
5. e vo Cv oa,( - a -
6. 1
7.
8. I
9.
10,
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
' 18.
19.
20.
21. _
22,
23,
24.
25.
rA
i
I
oak-Hickory Street Petition
We the undersigned, residents of Donlon Texas respectfully request the City Council to adopt
the following policies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street re-paving project:
1. To discourage dangerous hlgh speed traffic through the university and adjacent
residential areas, retain the existing "footprint" of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency.)
2. That the current Irafflc pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be retained. (to; two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, one-way from Carroll to Jagoo)
3. That the current parking conflgurallon be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4. We urge the Council to take steps to protect the stability of the neighborhood by
Insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffic lanes.
Na Address Phone W
-.2 5A-K
3, ' } _s I
a Odd S a r -a -so
C.
i Z
6. Ye-- L4-k2
7. _
8. c~ t
9. 0z - 3
UA/ .31r 3 ~ f'~ Y i
10. 1 2r. q-( W ~~Nh 3b1' o j
11 . S o
12. 'C rlZ. _~rrs z.m v w. o e k Q I-Icy
13, r ~OiO i V 601
14. s
15. lL~ • n _.3 '11_
111 L
6.
17.
18.
19. ~I
20.
21.
I 22.
23.
24.
25.
s
Q/
Oak-Hickory Street Petition
We the undersigned, residents of Donlon Texas respectfully request the City Council to adopt
the following policies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street re-paving project:
1. To discourage dangerous high speed traffic through the university aid adjacent j
residential areas, retain the existing "foolprint" of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless l
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency.)
2. That the current traffic pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be retained. (le; two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, one-way from Carroll to Jagoo.)
3. That the current parking configuration be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4. We urge the Council to take steps to protect the stability of the neighborhood by
Insuring that Oak will never have more than Iwo traffic lanes.
Name Address Phone #
3. r5AP, L_ a r of
t+
6..i (~/Itlul t.)c+tt A^ V1'n'1
271
9. F r r~,r - 44 3
]1, I G,, _ ~n0! 'lc. ~c vl 3 Sf"";t
12, 1
13
~~e~( 4,4154 n1r
STA
15 5bS
t' o
16 C 5 U
n
. G
17
_ 53-1-
i 19, 15.1 & h 4!-~ S !Ye 7 Qc'~L[C+,T 7,C J' r, C I? di
21' , e'-
23,
,L#,~u _ 5G6R~6E~L
24. 1 'Vusa S, 2.11
25, _ ,d
,ZG.E uv& rVt~> Lf 5e0'1 rvr 51ol,n, 3%-7,.95
~ t1Ai~yo.'i;-\ l~o~~,~ 131 (,L~rjc~n, f~t"+1 r'n~ Slob ~~Lo/~
'N1 ?cm
t
Oak-Hickory Street Petition
We the undersigned, residents of Denton Texas respectfully request the City Council to adopt
the following policies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street re-paving project;
1. To discourage clangorous high speed traffic throigh the university and adjacent 1
residential areas, retain the existing "footprint" of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency,) 1
2. That the current haffiu pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be retained. (le; two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, ona•way from Carroll to Jagoe)
3. That the current parking configuration be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
I
4. We urge the Council to lake steps to protect the stability of the neighborhood by
Insuring that Oak will never have more than Iwo traffic lanes.
Nam
Address Phone #
4.
5, a o/i
6.
7. 6 -
9.
10.
11.
12.
13. J
14.
15.
16.
17,
18.
19.
f 20.
I 21.
22.
23.
24.
.
i
' Oak-Hickory Street Petition
We the underslgned, residents of Denton Texas respectfully request the City Council to adopt
the following pollcies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street re-paving project:
1. To discourage dangerous high speed traffic through the university and adjacent
residential areas, retain the existing "footprint" of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless i
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistancy.)
2. That the current tralfic pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be retained. (le; two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, one-way from Carroll to Jagoe.)
3. That the current parking configuration be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4. We urge the Council to take steps to protect the stability of the nelghborhood by
insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffc lanes.
Na a Address
1. ~ Phone #
3. ' r Jes
MAI?
6. 4~7 0--y- t.9 I AA
V)6' e Ce /2
I I r r <
9.
Ili f365 W 4 ~ 3-
eMa
12. -7 dt
13. I ,
14.
15. 130> ,n•b , h, 13-?5q9~
li V Y') 1>
3-O ?Qo
16, r a~ ~o S - (cZb
71
17. 4 G 7
f 19. ' -
20. tiJ c t rf
21.
22, I
23,
-o'ray
24.7
~ _ ~rs•0 w. okt 383 -3~ b
25• 12
i
ti
ri
t
Oak-Hickory Street Petition M
We the undersigned, residents of Denton Texas respectfully request the City Council to adopt
the following policies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street re-paving project:
t. To discourage dangerous high speed traffic through the university and adjacent
residential areas, retain the existing "footp:inl" of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of ccnsistancy.)
2. That the current traffic pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be retained. (le; two- 1
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, cne-way from Carroll to Jagoe)
3. Thal the current parking configuration be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4. We urge the Council to take steps to protect the stability of the neighborhood by
Insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffic lanes.
Name Address Phone i
°lDZ w.
I w ~
L. ti
Rrr
I 4.-
5.
7.
I
8.
k 9
10. ,
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. j
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22
24.
j 25.
I
i
ri
Oak-Hickory Street Petition
We the undersigned, residents of Denton Texas iespeclfully request the. CityCouncil to adopt
the following po"l,;ios concerning the Oak and Hickory Street repaving project: 1
1. To discourage dangerous high speed traffic through the university and adjacent
residential areas, retain the existing "footprint" of Oak and Hickory Streets. (Unless
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency.)
2. That the current traffic pattern of Oak and Hickory Streets be retained. (le; two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, one-way from Carroll to Jagoe.)
3. That the current parking configuration be retained, (with the possible exception of
the rorth side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4. We urge the Council to lake steps to protect the stability of the neighborhood by
Insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffic lanes.
Name Address
1, Phone #
3. -
4. 8t
6. cL(/ J p S~ O S~
r
8.
9.
f' 3 - 3 i
10 La. ti,ti. ~V 1,/
11: 3
12, i ai _ s~d_e p
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
i 22.
23.
24.
25.
I -
t
I
J
i
.
(A
l
t1
Oak-Hickory Street Petition
We the undersigned, residents of Denton Texas respectfully raquesl the City Council to adopt
the following policies concerning the Oak and Hickory Street re-paving project:
1. To residential dareeas, retainn the existing footprintraffic
of Oak and h Hickory university a adjacent
necessary to narrow portions for the sake of consistency.) I
2. That the current Iraff c pattern of Oak and Hickory Sheets be retained. (te; two-
way from Jagoe to Bonnie Brae, one-way from Carroll to Jagoe.)
3. That the current parking configuration be retained, (with the possible exception of
the north side of Oak from Jagoe to Marietta).
4. We urge the Council to take steps to protect the stability of the nelghborhood by
insuring that Oak will never have more than two traffic lanes.
Name
Address Phone #
1'--T" /oil c✓.pRK .
{
2. „p 3~7 O!U¢ 61
3.
4.
s
1- 3J' P74.
7 3Y I -
9. Q ° ,2- 730
Z B B 3y1-yor
10.- 4~1
• 11. ,
12.
14..
7. y
15,
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
I
I
Y. ~JJ
' I
V
i
IIEULZU
rTl=
E
I li
I I
i
ME=
nclDZLLJ
ME=
3ZEjZLLJ
IMEED
f
I'm HHHHHHHif
ell 41
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 1
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Kent W. Key/North Park Savings
RECOMMENDATION:
The Tax Technician has determined that a tax refund should be issued.
SUMMARY:
Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of
the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00.
North Park Savings has requested a refund in the amount of $ 711.96 on
Account # 3942-00063, for they paid on the wrong account.
BACKGROUND:
Kent W. Key and North Park Savings both paid $ 711.96 each on this
account. North Park Savings is supposed to pay taxes on Mr. Key's rental
property, not his home. Tax records indicate payments of $ 1,423.92
against a tax base of 711.96. A tax refund is due.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS R GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Tax Department and the tax account of Kent W. Key
FISCAL IMPACT:
i
$ 711.96 i
RE CTFULY ~MITIED
•
F U
-1 01 W F
a re
l City Manager
Prepared by:
ame Vic Schneider
Title Tax Technician
Approved:
a Jim un d
le Treasur
2633C/3
1
1~
(A
I
e
SU14 prop"T•c aoard APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
R•wnd ApWlutlon 71.Hiirltl
Ce°Acting Office Na C { ' - 7 .r ,U
Co ecting Tax For: me: P'' "1
(ax ng nits
Address
City, State. Zip Code
In order to apply for a tax relund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer.
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER:
Name: Kent W. Key
Address: 34 Roilin Hills Circle. Denton, Texas
Telephone Number (if additional information is needed):
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY:
Description of Property, f o rye ~~;Qc. °Z,, ~/e s-k R '~o f h
34 Ro111nR Hills Circle
Address or Location of Property:
Account Number of Property,-RSZ ' or Tax Receipt Number: _
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES:
Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of
From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund
Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested
1, Denton Cites 19 68 12-, 1988 S $ 711.96
S
1 19 ti' I9tlsr- $ -1/4 916
S 1
3. 19 --119_- $
k
Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): paid wrong account number. 1
wr. Key's residing residence was paid twice, once by him and once by us. We are J1I
supposed to a for his rental property, not his home residence.
"I hereby apply for the refund of the above-described taxes and certify that the informaton t have given on this form
is true and correct"
(/L~Cf-Q ~✓~d~~i~ lade/,YL f' 2-4-84
It Ind, s,.t TX 75aw Date of Application for Tax Refund
Signature PO d01C 830Vf<0
DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval --Disapproval
Signature of Authorized Officer Date
Date
Signature of Presiding Officer(s) 01 Taxing
Unit(s) for refund applications over SS00
Any person who makes a lelee entry upon the tore0oinq record shell be eub)ect to one of 1Mfollowing penaWee; t. Imprisonriw of
not more than 10 years nor lose then 0 years and/or a One of nol mwe then 10,000 or both such AM and
Imprisonment 1. confinement In (all for a term up to I year or a One not Ie exceed 11,000 or both such One and Imprisonment asset
lorth In Section 07.10, Penal Code.
NVu.4 71,1
!I
I
I
- tA
# F
a
Northff~= IE N
S wi
February 9, 1989
NOW CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL BANK, FSB.
City of Denton Tax Office
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
RE: Tax Refund
I
To Whom It May Concern:
I
Please find enclosed an application for a tax refund and copies of the
front and back of the check which was issued to the City of Denton Tax
Office.
1 ,
We are requesting a tax refund in the amount of $711.96. We paid the
wrong tax account and have submitted payment to the correct tax account
which was mailed today also.
If you should have any further questions, please call me at 214-669-3600.
Thank you,
Alice D. Snyder
Loan Servicing Specialist
E ads
k J
Enclosure
**I have enclosed a return envelope for your convenience.
I
281 W. CAMPBELL R DJ / P.O. BOX 630460 / RICHARDSON, TEXAS 76080-0460/AC 214 669-3600
i
s
Nortfark 5airings n BLP
u u G.L. 82441-51-1 nia
51-6805
DATE AMOUNT
Dec. 19, 1988 $23,985.91
PAY'S`'' I,:: 9•-: me x """To THE City of Denton Tax- ollector o DIR 215•East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Nortn►~A, Sivlnq, ~~J}
775 W. Cimpbiq Ro,d
a,anereron.T,..,.. 4100680511' 1:311073535t: 8 20 1006 1109 tigw
DATE
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
j 12/19/88 Brentzel, Richard Ln#210-689-2
f Everett, Cerald D. #210-794-3 481.46
Massey, Jake G. #210-572-5 334,01
Ankrom, Melanie C. N210-666-9 806.53
Shafer, Ervin D. 8210-795-6 327'81
Rowdon, Norris 8230-676-6 283,31
Key, Kent W. 8210-„686-3 66b.19
REO - Dimension Dev, 8250-49-8 711,96
20,374,64
fECl4-86 341 MoIHg -PMp06 C 244351-1 TA 239:5.91 62S20 Total 23,985.91
HorthPuk Sarinps Anooistioe
I
r
1
r~
S
.,i CcwrT MAL 1,1Pl I
~94200042 1988 THRUs 3943001316 1988 0 11 41.I&
WE WIM TAX TRM WUSCL KX PM W POK" IFFE W NEXT PCWH op'
ACCr0m P "M WK WT TAX COOL A P>iMtt TAR AtO M PRI9 I~MypPUE P94 PA TOTAL OW ACtk*khl
0400, Pk%" F T I& ~ NN +MM 1 t /t0 6P0.lP 1 bP. a X12.% i
gg sS ,
iA//~1' JA~Et A 1' 00. "gym 1 1' s9 tPO- a'1
atislr~l
LAW UQAi tl1R "g"go" 1 1 u+Jl
"55x01~1.1( 1
PP30 w6Or, R7P LP I 1 mm"
LUL R.
CiS ,
A}~({ GKW" P 1,11. fmatom 1 1,41 "Sn,
,LlI~L€ax J L XAT1R"t I 1 1 ITS 11 1 1 uAlr
tIt axn
S yCfObt IA11 T 1 "MMNI f 1,0 "
u
1 rMMPgI / 1 "5(C f
CO.OItL~L s t L Ar
A S
s&P CE 11 1, QS 1TM 11 f, "11W %
wkm, fMICtT O 7 t ,MMPMI 1 1 u„~'' 1
SS
M11
w ■ 1 / H1.%- 40 711.96- uYJ(w?
IQ %D~1 sAV v AN UK •1 1PMI000I 11M SSS.4 1 aP 7. CNo 02
"Mma ~Ap~ t ~~lT1'~ra[[++cerU• ! mm c
uuN r ,
CcLmk: L A91 1 T1MMM1 11 1 1
NBfOr, J O NglS DTC 1 11tliMM 1 1 ♦ - t ~VL~• '
LCtIT~ r
w", E .071 TIMMMI 1 1 f;.l
k rim O[ 1rr AM "Of""
gNt 1 r1MMOO1 IA AJ-P i
W! ku &M T3 CU% iol"m !1 "?(p 1
1 .1 ti''+r'
gpvftwv~ 9 Li On
"foopm
MR. MOHM
` JCPPi0T1 ` A 4, rMP1 1 1,1 cN!~~i i.
it!Cl'
LAC 79""m u
s afi1
r4OMM1 1 / LL,t l ,
~AT;tt rw/ON 1 ' SIO. 510.
PR1C , O~AYIM! Y /IMIMPM ; /
,
CJ1Ytlt! If
W M T 6
6 ims~ wo YA 1 :14 T
324300017 1989 TH U : 395000400. 1999 P 11 JIL4 9!1
PAIL 1/31/M TAX lkm &#UK( KX PW 108 hBMLtr tPPtCT1rS NE1fT PtlrRM
~AtRONIT f rtJN qr[ WT TAX COOS A PD-w" UN wrn MW earn T,, ns a..' V-
Y,
1
1
S
J1
I
i
I
J~
\I
1
1
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
j
LL
<II
r
ti
I~ t
1
C/
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM. Lloyd V. Harrel'., City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Luther hlcCrae Etal/Olney Savings
{
RECOMMENDATION:
The Tax Technician has determined that a tax refund should be issued.
SUMMARY:
Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of
the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00.
Olney Savings is requesting a refund of $ 690.47 on Account # 8907-00378,
due to a Denton Central Appraisal District correction of the Improvement
BACKGROUND: Value on the account.
Olney Savings paid $ 3,351.09 on 12-27-88. On Supplemental Roll # 6,
j the DCAD lowered the Improvement Value on the Account, resulting in an
overpayment of $ 690.47. Olney Savings wants tnis amount refunded for
lir. McCrae's escrow account.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
T& Tax Department and the tax account of Luther McCrae Etal
{ FISCAL IMPACT:
$ 690.47
i
~ ECTFJJLL USM D:
oy (V. arre
City Manager
'I Prepared by:
L
Name Vic Schneider
Title Tax Technician
Approved:
e J Au yar
T tie easu or
633C/3
fA
i
5 L N n.17 1, L P.\v :D F, I S r1~T e.,1. fE :wv e-LL 91, L Ti, R 4EU el rr FI PL.
y, 5
>♦a.a.e 0-r-1 _It ,1.r;_r:ra.ia_r?_rti:ra REPLY-MEMO RM-11
To City of Denton FROM OLNEY SAVINGS
215 E. McKinney St. P.O. BOX 307
Denton, Tx 76201 OLNEY, TEXAS 76374
Phone 18171 564-5502
1988 Tax Refund Jan. 18, 1989
MCSSAO E,
Enclosed is the original tax receipt for Luther McCrae, acct e8907-00318
assessed value 565,298, Tax amount 3,351.09. We have received a corrected
statement on this property. The tax amount is 2,669.62. Olney Savings
is requesting a refund of 690.47 to be deposited to Mr. Mcrae escrow
account.
If you need more information, please call.
Sincerely,
De Wayne Strealy, Tax Clerk
I 011{IR{1011.00 VDT W11T1 I,LDW fHll LIHI REPLY TO
RIP" +
III 1
t I
' I
1 011 /IIMU
sale FAPTO 1 DDD ! IH11tt-In1t 1 WILL 1111TYWJI4 WITH 01111.1
RM17
11TU1N TO 01101NAF011
1
1
i 1
i
I
a
k
TAX STATEMENT YOUR TAXES ARE DUE OCTOBER Clryof A TaxUrPar+men?
lit AND BECOME DELINQUENT :Il t N,Ainnn5r
FEBRUARY lot SEE REVERSE Arnrun, Trw 78.101
SIDE FOR PENALTY AND INTER- PHO~NEMa ANA
EST DETAILS.
TOYN HILLo BLOCK Is LOT 2 ACCOUYTbUMMR" YAK V% I
6901-00378 1989 5928
r ,A
303 CARROLL BOULEVARD 565029 565x298
iA!
565 il9f 3• 51.09
1 ~o .3c Re 7> S~ o x:. .oo
3yJ I.o9
13102
TRAPP R t MCCRAE L.
1602 ANNA
DENTON TX76201
FOR RETURN RECEIPT, SEND 80TH STATEMENT FARTS WITH SELF-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE
1
k
j I
i
i
{
4
I
1
i
I
i
I
ri
I
IJ2PL. E"E 114L 0ILL *p
j PROPERTY TAX ROLL Tor: aE+11ur .110 ILrINI YEAR I""'' t+t_',: clr,_i•4 It`'2~ PAGE I
OWNTA NAME AND ADOAM PpOpFRTV DTSORIPTrON EAEMPTIONS VALUES TAx AM 1f'
TYPE AMOUNT TYPE AMOUNT AMOUNT
4I11u2A I. bbilII
CDs lit A7n1-9nI7A 1)n4 /ILL, 4LICl 1, LIt 2 +*u. CJP:?F. .1 VAL,IFS 4**44
4CCNEA, LU MER EIAL S11JSt 104 CAHNILL 14LVU LAND 'vHS 1 911#650 4ECEIr1 0 254/p
P 1 HJV 26nN ~1dga 1A
, ` (rPR 'i ,rl t ti K, 1ST 1•JTAL itV ,i',hhfl. hJ
)ENlllvr IA 16202 L11111ILS1 GOT, SVSr L'uS d,✓ ASSESHO 1 449,1121
1AYtaLF . nJ°,022
1 S'JPP C'JOEt C - CH4v4E
wP9
C)H9E:TEU Tai V4LI-1,14KE1' 1, .t. ,4.44 P7EYl 1'I VALUES 44*4
IvC)4E V SESSEU A 565,0,44 NECLIPI 4 i0b5d
l')TAL F1 w A T"ITAI TAx t1,151.11
1AAldLE 1 565, 29M
I *04*• LAIN i, ~UB~~ A001f
14 xARLF r •116,10,6 of Al TAY 1.64n,11
JJ
1
I R (tllB
f [OS IJt 0(10 800 1 1 4)940 RLIC4 2, 1 in, 6114, CJRQENt VALIIFS 6044 1
4000LLAR, CA G O////04149 LAND n5 lbooll CEEYI r 25421
I 4226 1 IS 4 4 1191 Ain 4 L'1:11 IVPR ~I 1 130S* T L TAY 111P.A
II DENIUN, FA 6205 ASSE69 1 290049
4T11IE51 r,01, S Cn5 14x08 I ?9,806
S IPP COIE1 C - 111E 4444 PIEV1On VA S, u4A I
CON4ECIE0 1,APR AtN1 ASS EJ 1 410911 RECEIPT M 1 1
1) FV } n TITAL TAY 1? In
j
T LE ► 410911
I 4*46* 4AIN 0 USS 0600
'
4ARLF 1 -14, t22 TAL YAW 7.1111
4 9 t2616n)
C 101 4040-O1uu0 A01544 4 LLIVIVGr 14ACI 31 CRES 40611A CJRRE VALUES It li
UFF* T)ICK 9 O, I Tn 41 I S,0 LANO HS I T,A RECFIAT E44>'4
0 STROJU S1TJSt u A SIa)UJ (UT A. Sr J*PR '46 ► 410 TJTAL~IAN 02.2,7l
4T04, Tx 1b2ot ASSESSED 1 09,
ENIIT 1 Gut, Cu Sr Sus TAAANLE A 44 0
SUP° DEt C - CH44GE 1141, *6404 P4 JU VALUES ►A4
Abp HS E*F40T174 NO SSESSE') I I&P REFE1 4 110+n
749 f+ NIAL EA A 0 TUTAL 1292461
TArAALF A 0, 15A
4 6 A a 0 ;014 n S
TAMABLE •SrSUO 1
ili Ax 1.24464
be. 4.........
P2944r (tffd
COS IDS 100 061n nLLEGE RF0n1Y 41 4LnCK S, LnT *0 C'14RF11 VALUES 0*4*
01CGAR, CARL S l0 ES01 S10'r 41 ///Adi6Oo A S0000 LAND H ► 90442 CEIPT 4 254
IOS R91C I11J11 Too; P111I 1 4 S,npn 104 M I 2n,11S 1 AL YAW 9140
UENIU%* 19 6281 ASSES ► lotIST
E4T11tESt 5n1, r CAS 14xA 1 2S,}10,
S'JA* C)9E1 C 4114gE /lay 1 Awl .4460 ►4EVTJII V IES 0044
j A)pEJ H5 E4t^' iJN AS 1F1 A S0, 1S) MECEIPI M 1114
1,arTJf/a~S `i ►r 1 0 1 ItAL TAY T441T
i
ti
? 1988 Rift 8297m3%
~n atop WWI rQiiwrt 14X
nu,~ a r 00.6m roc PM VXPMTY -Sol
vx%
TY748
R.~ W"m
a ~j aw"
mom waft 4mm "WIN mum s.~e,Ar r cam
;to.14
UPS ~aa. .oe ao 40 Ism
a.c
Mum
r.
arc a t Noun "x
mom
=logo
OATt Est
~!MR r ~rLV1~l~y~ tuc tRIK. wN[t .~w~,
I~.i tAf MtT, TAR MM 1 MIA .aock ~~'TM V
fEttM t!'RT
rare a[ -I 4I ~rx
I
I
i
i TIM=
i
I
I
I
li
I
e
r.
t
S k
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Stanley D. Ivie/Olney
Savings
RECOMMENDATION:
The Tax Technician has determined that a tali refund should be issued.
SUMMARY:
Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of
the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00.
Olney Savings has requested a refund in the amount of $ 506.76, since
they made duplicate tax payments on account # 8905-01089.
BACKGROUND:
On 11-30-88, Olney Savings made a payment of $ 506.76. Olney Savings
made another payment on 12-27-88, also for $ 506.76. Tax records indi-
cate payments of $ 1,013.52 against a tax base of $ 506.76. A tax re-
fund is due.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: {
The Tax Department and the tax account of Stanley D. Ivie
I
FISCAL IMPACT:
$ 506.76
I
` R ECTF LL UBMITT
i
oy arre
city Manager
Prepared by:
/C
ame Vic Schneider
Title Tax Technician
Approved:
e Jim Bu yar
tie Treasur
2633C/3
1
Y
state prop" om
Refund t• ecue
Refynd AP;Wk ~pplkat Tian 71.1 1(1110) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND
Collecting Office Name.. CST dr=n 70n ~r Qr.~ f
Collecting Tax For: r n c ,
( axing nits)
E-. C~~in n F v ern "fun 7,! 7d 40
Address
C4ty, State. Zip Code
In ordor to apply for a tax refund. the following information must be provided by the taxpayer.
IDENTIFICATION ~F P OPERT OWNER:
Name: S r7~1 e. _ ~YI~c°
Address: _ ~~~5' Rrr; , r 1)f-,, ?j '7)e
Telephone Number (if additional information is needed):
IDENTIFICATION OF PAOPERTY: /
Description of Property: _ n.d - s'pc Ti✓c~ 61orX- 3 40 -17
Address or Location of Propery. 1~1rro c
Account Number of Property: 'DOS -0/0b~/ Or Tax Receipt Number.
INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES:
Nome of Taxing Unit Yearfor Amount of
From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund
Is Requested to Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested
Y11 o , fea s Z26, 7.6 S
2.cl ~k v can C^ 19 'Fe lo~~.x171 19 S S-06,76 S S'06'•76
3. 19 l 19 _ $
f
I
Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): 4/" F-Y Dn ralf~~
f"a ABCs fiyii c L /ri Ce-r-o r^ D„ /1 2k-8~ R 01 C✓ On /0.2 -.4 7-6-b, '7 cX
8re _~p~Y'J~ng rJ Yr~ Yy.r~ t>T ~~s pyt°rP7~iltfrr~
^I hereby apply for the refund of the above-described taxes and certify that V*9 1 have given on this form
Is true and correct"
r r k yM Q~
All
Signature V pn 46 X 407 66 Ef ;Tip 4,7 Dale of Application for Tax Refund
DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval
Signature of Authorized Officer Date
j Signature of Presiding Otflcer(s) of Taxing Date
Unit(s) for refund applications over $500
!1 Any person whe mak" a Isles entry upon tho forepany record sties be f ud)ect to one of tta toltowing penalties; 1, tmprl/onmertl of
not male Ihan 10 gars not lees than I! years and/al a ens of not more then 10,000 at bath such One and
Impri/arinri 2. conOnemeM In (ell for a l/rm up le 1 year or s fine not td sxcoed $7,000 or bath such Nine and Imprlsonmsnl ale set
film In sectlon 77,10, Fenal Code.
11VW.O ti u
90 COLLECTIONS
J
i
1
1
I
1
I I
, KAApurfmrrtt
' TAX STATEMENT YOUR TAXES ARE DUE OCTOBER C bev~q Tax
lit AND BECOME DELINQUENT :711 E Winn u
FEBRUARY fit. . SEE REVERSE SE lkmon. Rfa 7eml
SIDE FOR PENALTY AND INTER- pHOwE 566 hg
EST DETAILS,
I
890EE-OI089 gee 5928
=SAGOKE SEC TNO. BLOCK 39
e5.48S e59 485
e06.76 5
I
0x .00 r ,
'77 STANLEY 0 I
506.76 1
VIE 3225 BRCOKE DENTON TX76201 O
FOR RETURN RECEIPT, SENO EKTTH STATEMENT PARTS W"M SELF-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE
I I-
J
TAX VA EPFil Tm KkTKDUE ACCa , 1
TAX TRIAL yr/WCE RF1L TE 1AX PAID M PI 0 VQq,
~c~ r 1lS11 IET IAJI tODE A PO-0A 1•
A
t1EEAARR1 g 1111 SS.1 2; 4 QUti ,
OaVELQNBIT 1 ~ TINMINM a'"~
~IS
lM . yEIpON C SR ` j. J2 4 P'~
ibb
~&:INl~1tE CS P 1 % 1 ex-' 1
WiS9~~ 1 S. 66.
S 0 SD, ? i
I lit 11NYf1lM 4 9" I
~ ~ ~TR 11NIIN~
y1~'C!~ MNNIM / 4 j 1r;
SM1U[R DEVEL01 -
Y#111lIM 4 ~iy.
TaER r ~ 4 { / 4
~~M 7
L MIX,
ft1iE~ OE1fEl61~T •
jpdEM p 4 M ` 4. P y
OS. ?o
ry
J ~y
pRyg~fT« ~4%D yV9. 7Q 75
1ecR ~ M1i..M«
• T1.TnMN
e'l
T % U r~ 7~ZIIPNN It
TDIMI. MN~MM i •a ~7 f T
4 , • 1
` - • ~ ,
- YTIMMM / a a 1
+ I JIRI T i4pN114
MNY ~ - • 2S6
/ 216.
+ RAU~M w e rT+ / 2{a
aJ1l1COU fY lMT " '
tH1Y RA/AM RtAL
1
i
I
i
rl
a
-44 1
i
J
I
{
i
!
~ I
i
i
I
I
I
i
I
l
a
a y
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Glen IV. Justice
RECOMMENDATION:
The Tax Technician has determined that a tax refund should be issued.
SUMMARY:
CTTanfer 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of
the guverninq body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00.
Glen W. Jus,`ice is entitled to an automatic refund of $ 503.37 on Account
73:0-00200, due to a Denton Central Appraisal District correction of the
BACKGRuiND: Improvement Value on the account.
~ZlenP- Justice made a payment of $ 1,100.11 on 11-01-88. On Supple- '
mental Roll # 3, the DCAD lowered the Improvement Value on the account,
resulting in an overpayment of $ 503.37.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Tax Department and the tax account of Glen W. Justice
FISCAL IMPACT:
4
j $ 503.37
RE CTFULLY SUBMITTED:
i
a
ty Manager
' Prepared by:
kcc, 1646
Name Vic Schneider
Title Tax Technician
' Approved:
nd
#33C/3 im Bun a
Trea. r l
SUPPLEMENTAL RILL 43
DENTIN CITY (COST 1998 P4INTEDI W 4 O1f32PM 2p
PROPERTY TAX ROIL lor: _ YEAR PAGE
OWNER NAME AND ADDRE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION EXEMPnON5 VALUES TAX A~MOUNi~IP.
_ TYPE AMOUNT TY AMOUNT _ AMOUNr
Tazz-nliroa6~T - -
JOMµSpN, M O MULL143 MHP, :6 a u• CURRENT VALU &A***
At I Box 93BV HS 6 10,996 RECEIPT ■ 22991
DENTONO TX 76201 01 ENTII1ESf DO1; 505, ~fg ESS(o ! 100996 OTAL TAX 965.111
AA .N AXARLE S 10,996
&AMMMOM q
/ LEf T'Off RLL4 Name. PREVTUU ALUES e►rr /
-,'Tr+11~i:~P(':~%'N.E' .A PREVIOUS V4LUE3 DP EXIST FOR HIS IT[
armi : SA LOSS rrrrr
T4XABLF TOTAL LAX ! 0
. .
R;2149 757691
JONES ON M. SINGING OA BLOCK 14, LOT 11, uur RENT VALUES III**
SS 11 001HROSM 1111/1-I4 TOACHUM 1442 ! 5,900 LANO NS 8 % 5,263 RECEIPT I 22992
DEN . TX Tb201 „ Q SIIJBI 3 9007TMRliSH 5 5,090 INPR HS S 60,957 TOTAL, TAX 419,25
~r~~ASSESSED 75.120
ENIIt1 GOi, 5050 COS ~ 149ASLE 70,720
,
SUP► Ef C - CHANGE /l'f1~ r PqE Y10U VALUES r
400 S EXEMPTION SSEa ! 15,120 NEC I IOSSS
10TH' ! G TOTA X !194.97
14X4 S 75020
i
ink* GAIN 0 03
rr
Z LE $ -50000 'YAK 8.20.64
►106032 TIS9939)
- JOSIENOS STUDENT CENTER PIRS04ALOPROPENTY - S OFf9C[ sent CURRENT VA' 4 *000
4216 N I-IS LOCATIO49 1216 1 $S 4104 ERSONAL 1 16,000 RECEIPT N 22993
DEMON, TK 76201 SIIJBI 4216 1.35'4 !J~ 453[83[0 1 16,000 TOTAL, ?At 894.8
DEMON, TA 1 %AXARLf 1 16,000/
ENIITIESI GOI, 5 OS ecru PREY VALUES elver
S ►PI oo l A PREVIOUS VALUES OT EXIST FOR MIS t
1t,OF}1'R9LLl rare 0 LOSS riser
TAXABLE! , 00 ,IS
027484 (94018)
JUSTICE, GLEN K OMSLEY PARR, BLOCK To LOT 2, rrur CURRENT VALUES Lrru
564 ND91M ERVAY, 11,1 FLOOR 2,31391 WIE PUCMALSKI 996 LAND MS 1 15,7SO RECEIPT I 22991
DALLAS, 19 15201 0 SIIJBI 1221 StELLA IMPR NMS S 04,914 lOtAI,VAX 1596,76
p7U /Ata ~ MESSED 1 100,669
ENit11E5e GOIr 815, COS /-P AAABI[ S 100,664
F JR SUP►ICODEI C . CH44CE l rfr / 00000 PREVIOU VALUES 06+2
tKP400ENENT MOVED 10 8102216 ASSE63ED 6 15S,SIS RECEIPT I 10490
TOTAL EX S 0 TOTALr TAX 81,IIf,l1
TAXABLr. S 1350578
ramu GAIN O OS uur
TAXABLE 5 -54,914 OTALrTAR 1•SISi3T
. . . . V#** N, PAUL ADONIS, SPACE NM SERI MCRINNEY LOT 6 B 028267 HI 1 50014 1 10,662 IPT 0 22995TK 76201
lot ! 5'000 D S 16,662 TAX ESf 001, 805, 105 s 5,662
t
V
I
E
i
j
732000100 1988 THRU: 737000600 1955
041E 121!1114 TAX TRIAL BALANCE REAL PAR 164 ItNAITV E111t1IYE MELT MOMTP
Attewl I TEAR MAN MET TAX CM A PS-MTE TAX PAID PEN PAIR tax M PEN out TOTAL but
~~~~gqpppp~~pppp ~I ~5ii 1L e ~1~pt pp ACCOUNT TOTAL IVE.766
32000106"iS ~OIT~~~; GCfAMR' .•-----••-•---------4dr. ..I!t!D!!!!--17224.....4 . Zen ---Z.1....... iea
ACCONT TOTAL 14.16
131000200 M MITICI, GLEN V t,100 11 1 WM 4110 507.31 04
1)2000200 H ITICI, GUM V A 9124 44 .31 00
152000200. 14 NA►1100114 AVIM9,_PAU Y___.__ _ M 11101 4,1 11- ~Qp ~p~y11- .~pppp 11-
152000700
, ►MlL 'JR 1;1!162_ iriiiiiliE----- ,Otf,
112000/00 " 0E1MAN, JOE 1LOT9 171,19 T1146NN 12120 031.19- .00 Qp .00 .00
131000900 14 Lon JANIS R S66.62 TTD14E141 12130 561.62- .
00 .00 .00 .00
1010 U ldli:io.T
1320014w " Islet T, 11:41108110
JAMS R 2,021.01 T1DDRr m .00 .00 . 2,021.01 .00 2,021.01
172001600 " ►t"N", Mf J A 66.49 sTDROIGM 00 OD 66.11
13y220p0p1149600p 61 ►t"60M, Mi J A 66.60 .00 .00 M:69 16:000 12.49
132001600--tl-•~t8~;•11-1-p•---•------•--••-----nan-------------------------
ISMI600 N PEAnow, no J A 44.25 .00 .00 44.25 2635 10.60
152001600 63 PtARSOM, Mt J A 42.00 .00 00 42.00 30.24 12.24
112001600 w PIASSOM, Mf ! A 34.25 9000
232001600 i1 PIAASON M , J A 29.60 30.25 32.13 10.74
00 29.10 26.60 }51.40
f FSMI 00 N PLA1100, 03 J A 21.64 .00 20.64 1/.64 60.26
132001600 11 PEARtOM, Mf J A 21.64 .00 .00 24.64 33.36 62.00
232001600 FA ►IAOfOM, MRS J A 8.50 .00 .00 6.50 11.43 19.91
132001600 12 PEY14N, of J A 6.50 .00 .00
6.50 12.45 20.91
14om.I01ft.....i44.11.
132001100 " MLbrtINI, !AT 246.5) Y1s UNIX .00 .00 246.53 .00 NAM
134000100 " "PON IAY[M6f ASSOCIATION 1,406.10 Y3'NRMNa 11129 103.35- A 10).35 .00 103.315
134000400 " NOUN, K SALE 346.12 "$ON"
134000600 " CANTO, A+IAL10 M 60.02 TTMMNI 12!06 60:0602- :05 M 346.12 .00 546.12
; gA E'' ;-fR11-1..... 00 .oo 81, ..g1.....;..
734000100 61 tAMRa, on E
1346x1000 Kw v, DONALD A 2•On6 T E :0600 :00 ~:0066 .000 0 ::On6
134001100 M MILLINENAM, Y V 651:11 TURR14M 12101 651.81- .00
734wm 14 MILL[MGMM V Y 151.23 TIMIRRRR6 12!01 1S6. 1S- .00 :0600 .000 0 •000
0
------------------t~ I:c:i-----tts
1!5000300 64 Plato" i;oARtMEM S LTD 1,317.63 TTg6MM 11129 1,313 13- ,00 .00 .00 ,00
13!610400 INS PI RAHA ALP" MOLDING COO 66.69 Y1KN6nft 10126 66.6E .00 .00 .00 .00 00 13f616361 " 12 RA/" ALPMA MOLDING COO 66.0 1riMII6GN
10126 G6.N-
ISMOO 0 M ►I KAPPA ALPHA NOLDIMG COA► "Ay 1MNOMRI 40!28 M w- .000 0 .0000 •000 0 .000
0
4- ;I M. p- tf ~f i `i• ti •10 ...._.....tta1 - --~5~ .g ~....:1...........gg._......:g~......... :gg.
775000/00 14 II KAPPA ALPHA MOLDING COOP 66.0 r1DGMDKKT 10126 ".49- .00 oD .00 .00
139001000 60 t1IM6tlC JANIS P 103.31 T13NKG/tl .00 .00 103.51 .00 103.31
151061100 " NEMTM00~ APT Jill 3,011.bs 7tNDRRRIE 00 .00 ),010.6! .00 3,09665
133/01200 " A6Mt0 IITC 136.16 TMG616M 12170 176.110 .00 .00 .00 . .00
X 88•-il•-f! '4t-11t1:4~i'x•ws 0 H-. $g.---....g~....... 9...... III10.
71►000160 $4 GATEWA'D7~iW[Aatt KATIR t!M M 2, 10244 102.2 TTIRNNRK~M 12121 . IS- 00 2'x':00 2.as'.00
23
F
737000700 1986 THRU: ?421001067 Tqff'
K 18
Mil 121111" TAX TRIAL BALANCE REAL PAR 265 PEMALTI Iffict[YE AEtT 0041"
"Cow I TIAR MANG KT TAX CODE A P4-BATE TAX PAID PEN PAID TAX Out PIM euC TOTAL out
x11000/00 U GATtMAT Pw.IMC .105.01 7114D14M 12121 ?os.o2- .00 .00 .00
i
i
I
I
4
i
!I iiij
H Aglaia
I
I
i
i
li
I
1
f
I
i
all
IIFMJ I oil, maim
i
1
i
j
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR
THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE. i
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
rient, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the hereinbelow described bids are
the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies
or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
5_F&TI99_.,. That the numbered items in the following numbered
bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the
"Bid Proposals" on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing
Agent filed according to the bid number assigned thereto, are '
hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids
for such items:
BID ITEM J
NUMBED MBER VENDOR AMOUNT
9947 1 W. M. Dusenberry $ 81548.00
9948 1 Temple, Inc. $12,888.00
9950 1 Herbicides Tide Products, Inc. $ 91504.00
9950 2 Herbicides Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. $ 945.00
9950 3 Herbicides Chem-Spray North, Inc. $ 50033.28
9950 4 Herbicides Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. $ 169.25
9950 1-3 Insecticides Harpool Farm & Garden $ 496.80
9950 1-2 Miscellaneous Harpool Farm & Garden $ 138.00
9952 1-6 International Paper $90,000.00 1
9954 1 Eastern Electrical Apparatus $11,223.00
fiLQTj9AII. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer
t of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and
for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid 1
Proposals, and related documents.
I'
k
1
i
i
i'
R
a `
SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting
approved and accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter
into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his
designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the
written contract which shall be attached hereto, provided that the
written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained
in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and
accepted.
SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract
made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
f immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7th day of March, 1989.
I
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
t
j ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
t
i
I
t
f
1
DATE: MARCH 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
I
SUBJECT: BID# 9947 - FIBERGLASS STREETLIGHT POLE
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specification, W. M. Dusenberry in the amount of $8,548.08.
SUMMARY: This bid is for Fiberglass Streetlight Poles for use by the
Electric Distribution Department. Additional poles may be ordered for
Warehouse Stock replacement within thirty days of award of this bid.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution
FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Funds Account #610-080-0252-2626-9226
3
Respectfully submitted:
S
i
~ Llo 1 '
City Ma ger
I
Prepared by.
Name: Denise Marining
Title: Buyer
Approved:
C
A : o n J. Marshal
itl Purchasing Agent
005.DOC
I
r
f
N
I I t I I I 1 I t
310 1 9917 I I I I I I 1 I 3 !
t i 1
:IG LE FIEEFSIASS STREETLIGHT POLE CUMMINS SUPPLY: POLELINE 1 NESCO I FRIESTER I NELSON 1 6PAY'BAR : TEMPLE, INC. I W. K. I
TEMPLE, X. t
_______________i I ELECTRIC 1 1 SUFPLY I ELECTRIC 1 ELECTRIC t I DUSENPERRY 1 12 t
.,EKEO FEBRUARY 21, 1484 I t I I i i I I i 1
I I I I
i
I------•--------
1 I 1 : 1 1 : I I 1 I
I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
VENDOR ;
i I I I f 1
I , I i I I I
1 1 24 134' FIBERBL45S STREETLIGHT 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 i I I
i 1 POLEIARN i 407.00 1 127,00 t 106.00 1 421.00 1 350.00 1 NIB 1 541.00 1 356.17 1 101,00 1
I I I i 1 I ARM 57.00 1 i I I
I I I 1 I I I I I I I I
I :MAYE-POLE 1 1 WHATLEY 1 SHERMAN I WHATLEY I SHERMAN I I HILINE 1 SHANESPEAR I SHERMAN I
I I 1 i I I : I t 1 I I 1 +
I :DELIVERY 1 28-12 DAYS 1 30 DAYS 1 42 DAYS 1 35 DAYS 1 30-15 DAYS I 1 ! 35-40 DAYS I I
E 1 I 1 I t I I I I I I I t
I 1 1 I i i I I I I 1 I
Y 1 I i I I 1 I I I I r I' I
}
4
4
r
DATE: MARCH 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM- Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9948 - CROSSARM AIRSWITCHES
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder
meeting specification, Temple Inc., at a total amount of $12,888.00.
SUMMARY: This bid is for Crossarm Airswitches for use by the Eleccric
Distribution Department. Bridges Electric, Inc. Airswitch is the only
equipment bid on which meets City of Denton specification for
Crossarm Airswitches.
i
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
i
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDs Electric Distribution
` FISCAL IMPACTS Budgeted Funds Account 0610-080-0252-2519-9219
4Respectfu submitt ed-
l
City Manager
i
Prepared bys
i
Name: Denise Manning
Titles Buyer
Approveds
{1 ?ta 0 - J. Marshall/
i T es chasing Agent
IIr 005.DOC
r,
I
al
i
1 1 I
;
BID 1 9991
1 ! 1 1 ; 1 1 j
BID TITLE fAOSSARM AIRSN11PRiESIER 1 TEMPLE, IN[. 1 COMMINS 1 TEMPLE, INC. 1 TE'IPLE, INC. 1 NEL504 1 6RAYBAR I
SUPPLY 13 1 SUPPLY 1 It 1 12 ; ELECTRIC 1 ELECTRIC 1
OPENED FEIAUARY 21, 1959 ; COMPANY
1 ~ 1 1 ! 1 I
1 1 i i 1
ACCOUNT 1
~ 1 1 I 1 ! 1
1
! i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 i
I I DIY 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VE400R 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR VENDOR 1
1 1 . 1 '
1 I I I 1 1 i
I 1 6 1CROSSARM AIRSNITCN 1 N/1 1 1,618.00 1 2,010,00 1 2,060.00 1 21198.00 1 1,610.00 1 N/1 i i
! 1 I 1 ! 1 1 I 1 '
1 1TOTAL I 1 9,888.00 1 12,210.00 1 12,360.00 1 12,625.00 I 9,11D.00 1 I
i i 1 1 1 1 I 1 I ~
. I
1 I 1 1 1 I i i
I !DELIVERY 1 1 52-70 DAYS 1 1 81-91) DAYS 1 12-70 DAYS 1 1 I
~ I I I i I I I i 1 I
j I 1 I 1 i I 1 ! I I ~
I IMANUFACIURER i I KEARNEY 1 S6f 1 S&C i VIDDES I KEAPNEY 1 I
I i E 1 1 I 1 i E I J1
1 1 i 1 i I I I I E
1MODEl 1 1 1 13791287 1 1 1 EB202-15H 1
i
I I I 1 i 1 i i I I 1
i I i i I E I E !
I
i
i
i
i
I
i
h.
DATE: MARCH 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJ%CT: BID# 9950 - HERBICIDES AND INSECTICIDES
RECOMMENDATIONs We recommend this bid be awarded as followss
Herbicides
Item I to Tide ProdvCts, Inc, in the amount of
Item 2 to Van Waters & Rogers, Inc, in amount of $ 9,504.00
Item 3 to Chem-Spray North, Inc. In the amount of $ 945.00
Item 4 to Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. .in the $ 5,033.28
amount of $ 169.25
Insecticides & Miscellaneous
Harpool Farm & Garden in the amount of $ 634.80
SUMMARYI This bid is for Herbicides, Insecticides and Miscellaneous
chemicals for use by the Parks and Recreation Department. 1
BACKGROUNDS Tabulation Sheet
f
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDs Parks & Recreation
FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Funds Account #10U-031-0064-8105 1
Respectfully submitted: II~
L1 4Mgelr
Ci
1
Prepared by:
Names Den se Ma
Titles Buyer J
Approveds J
I I
I
es
. Mars 1
ha
i s s
*rcha
Agent
4 005.DOC
J
1
r
I
DATE: MARCH 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMS Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9950 - HERBICIDES AND INSECTICIDES
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded as follows:
Herbicides
Item 1 to Tide Products, Inc. in the amount of $ 9,504,00
Item 2 to Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. in amount of $ 945.00
r~ Item 3 to Chem-Spray North, Inc. In the amount of $ 5,033.28
Item 4 to Van Waters & Rogers, Inc, in the amount of $ 169.25
Insecticides & Miscellaneous
Harpool Farm & Garden in the amount of $ 634.80
SUMMARY: This bid is for Herbicides, Insecticides and Miscellaneous
chemicals for use by the Parks and Recreation Department.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Parks & Recreation
r
FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Funds Account #100-031-0064-8105
k
Respectfully submitted:
i
L1 oW$oWCK1 V
City M ger
Prepared by:
Lu,V ~
Name: Denise Manning
Title: Buyer
Approved:
~ kI
e: o n J. Is sha 1
i : Purchasing Agent
005.DOC
{
1 : I 1 i
BID B 99sa I i 1 ' I 1
~ I ; 1 I E
BID TITLE HERBICIDES 1 [%SECTIC10E5 I VAN WATERS 3 I LESCO, INC. , HARPOOL PARR CHEN-SPRAV I TIC
..._...._I ROGERS, INC. i 1 6 GARDEN I NOR1H, INC. :PRODUCTS, INC.1
r--~
OPE%E➢ FEBRUARY N, 1494 I I I i 1 i
I .
I I .
ACCOUNT ! ! ' I I 1
I---------•----~
I i I
! i 911 I ITEM DESCRIPTION E VENDOR I VENDOR VENDOR i VENDOR I VENDOR I j
I-------------- I-------------- I
; I 1 I I 4 I E
j I 'HERBICIDES
I I 1
I I '
1 1 I 1 160 :ROUNDUP 30-6ALLON DRUM 1 41468.40 1 NIB 1 11,100.00 1 91629.20 1 4,501.00 I
I 2 1 10 :RODEO 2.5 GALLON JUGS 1 915.00 : I 11160.00 1 NIB 1 964.20 1
3 i 672 (DUST 3LB. 1 5,537.26 1 61566.00 1 51033.26 1 51456.64 1
4 E 1 11MA6E I GALLON JUG I 169.25 1 i 298,00 t Nil I N!B :
I I : I I I I I i I
~ I I I 1 i 1 : : ~
} 1 IINSECTItt➢ES I i I I i I
i I I I I i I I
1 1 24 IK96 FIRE AM1 KILLER I GALLON I Nil I I 360.00 I NIB I NIB I
2 1 16 IOKANYL ID 6 4LB CAN 1 NIB 1 1 63.60 1 113 1 NIB I
3 1 12 1NRITNIRE 1300 31 CRTHANE IL9 CAN! Nil 1 1 73.20 1 NIB i NIB I
I i I I l I i i
1 I I 1 i i ! I
~ i I I I I i I I I
: MISCELLANEOUS 1 I I 1 i
! I i I ! i i I
1 1 24 KY-YIELD NON IONIC SPREADER 16AL1 1115,76 1 1 40.00 1 NIB 1 240.00 E
2 1 B IPUFFEN 1URF SPECIAL 1 GALLON I NIB 1 1 48.00 I NIB I NIB I
I ! i : I I
IDELIYERY 1 5 DAYS APO 1 1 14 DAYS 1 1 7 DAYS I
1 i : : I I i 1
1
I
J
DATE: MARCH 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMs Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9952 - UTILITY POLES
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder,
international Paper. The approximate total bid award is $90,000.00.
SUMMARYs This bid is for the annual contract for the purchase of wooden
utility poles. Sizes range from 35' to 55' and estimated quantities
k vary. Purchases are made in truckload quantities on an as needed basis.
The bid does contain a 12-month contract extension clause. If we
decide to accept the extension, all terms and conditions remain
unchanged.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
1
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMEZ?TS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDs Warehouse, Electric
{ Distribution
FISCAL IMPACT: 1988/89 Budget Funds for Warehouse Working Capital, 1
Electric Inventory Account #710-043-0582-8708 +
v
~ Respectful) submitted:
I
Llay H e 1
City Ma ager
Pre ared bys
ames Tom D. Shaw
Titles Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved!
shal
l
t7
e{{ OPurchja;i~grAgent
lf 005.DOC
J
i
BID 1 1
4912 I 1 ;
' 1 I I 1
1 I
IIb TITLE UTILITY POLES 1 COLFAI I PRIESTER 1 PRIESTER 1 LUFKIN !INTERNATIONAL (INTERNATIONAL 1
F.f.R..............---.--..... ___1CREOSOTINS CO.! 11 I 12 ! CPEDSOTIND :PAPER COMPANY I PAPER I
OPENED EUARY 24, 1969 I 1 1 lCOMFANY INC. 1 '
I ALTERNATE I
-1 ACEDIiNI l 1 1 I
1 I I
I......
1 I DTY I ITLN DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR 1 VENDOR
.......f •I ` VENDOP. i VENDOR I VENDOR ! VENDOR i
k °ll ..............I.............. 1.. 1
I 1 100 :PDLE 3514 1 108.00 1 119.63 1 108.00 1 98.33 1 1
2 1 60 IPOLE 4013 95.30 I 93.35 1
f I 155,00 I 1 163.00 I 140.88 I 137.45 1 171.20 I
3 1 225 !POLE 4313 1 186.00 1 1 191.50 1 169.33 1 165.75 1 163.25 1
4 1 75 lPDLE 45/2 1 214.00 1 236.71 : 219150 1 146.09 1 186.35 1 163.85 1
f 5 1 75 !POLE 5013 1 221.00 1 261.50 1 222.00 1 201.25 1 195.85 1 192.10 1
6 1 25 IPOLE 5513 1 257. D0 1 410.42 1 265.50 1 234.60 1 243.15 1 239.60 1
4 1 I 1 I I I
~l I :MANUFACTURER I STALOORTN I CONROE 1 1 1
I i
I IDELIVERY 1 1 ! 1 i
1 7-10 DAYS 1 14 DAYS 1 30 DAYS 1 7 DAYS 1 7.14 DAYS 1 1-14 DAYS I
I I 1 I I I
! ITRUCKLOAD I 1 I I i i
I I ~ " ~ r ~ I F I 1 I
' 1 I I
C
b
DATE: MARCH 7, 1969
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID# 9954 - TRANSFORMER CONVERSION
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder,
,026.100 ElecE-rical Aaratus, in the
transportation. Total bid award amount is of $iit2,,23?009 plus
$1
? SUMMARY: This bid is for the conversion of a General Electric 5000 KVA
transformer from Wye-Delta to Wye-Wye. Once converted, this transformer
will be utilized as a component of the emergency generators purchased
last year and being installed in the Municipal Power Plant.
j BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet and Memo from Ray Wells
PPOGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Utility and Electric
Production Division
FISCAL IMPACT:
I
j Respectful) submitted:
i
LloAHaa ell
City Manager
Pr aced bye
Name: TOM D. SHAW
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
hrshal
Agent
-gel
005.DOC
i
i
i
I
I
4
I I 1 1
Blo- E 99s9 I I I I I
I 1
:
BSD 1111E TFANSMISSIDN CONYEkSION !EASTERN ELEC. 1 CUMMINS 1 SOUTHWEST E GREENVILLE 1
1 APPARATUS I SUFFLY CO. 1 ELECTRIC 1 TRANSFORMER !
OPENED L DO D.M. FEBRUARY 28 1989 .REPAIR COMPANY: I I I
I INC. I ! I 1
ACCOUNT 1 ELECTRIC METERINS L SUBSTATIONS I
1.............. -••...........l.....•........I ..............I
I I 1 I : I 1
1 I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
I-----•---------- .......•.I.............. 1.............. --1------- I
~ ! I I ! 1 1 I
1-1 1 1CONVERT 5060 KVR B.E. I 104197.00 1 27,997.00 1 18,759.00 1 NIB I
1 !TRANSFORMER FRDM WYElD TO ! 1 1 ! 1
! :WYE-WYE CONNECIION I I
1 ! !
I I 1 1 ! I I
! !DAYS TO COM.^LETE 1 30 1 77-89 ! 16-300 1 1
1 I 1 I I ! 1
I ITRANSPORTATION 1 1,026.00 1 1 1 I
` I 1 1 I I I 1
f I : 1 1 I 1 1
I 1 ! ! I I 1
I
i
I ~
I
!
I
! I
I
!
I
I
i
I
i
4
cirr of cENrON, rEXAS 215 E. MCKiNNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE (817) 5664200 1
MEMORANDUM lII
70: John J. Marshall, Purchasing Agent 1
F": Ray D. Wells, Superintendent, Electric Metering & Substations
DATE: March 1, 1989 {
i
S'UBJErr: EVALUATION BID NO. 9954 - TRANSFOROM CONVERSION
Sealed bids were opened February 28, 1969 at 2:00 p.m. in the City of
Denton Purchasing Department. We had four (4) bid documents returned
one of which (Greenville Transformer Co.) was a no bid. After review of
the bids, I reomuend acceptance of the Eastern Electric, Fort Y;'zth,
Texas, bid in the amount of $11,223 ocuplete. This is the low bid
meeting specifications. The other bids were as follows:
Curmins Supply Co., Fort hbrth, Texas $27,997
f Southwest Electric Co., Oklah and City, Okla. $18,759
I request this be placed on the March 7, 1989 City Council Agenda, all J
correspondence being returned with this memo.
f Respectfully, llI
i Ray D Wel B I
RDW:gb
2FM30189250
cc: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
E. B. Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
I
i
I
I
I
S
1111111111 loll 11 i
rrT=
I
r 173=
I
J
ororl=
f 11
i
J
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD
OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the construction of public works or
improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and
city ordinances; and
j WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received
and recommended that the hereinbelow described bids are the lowest
responsible bids for the construction of the public works or
improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and
plans and specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE,
I
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the following competitive bids for the
construction of public works or improvements, as described in the
"Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on
file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according
to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved
as being the lowest responsible bides
DID NUMB F$ CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
9937 Atkins Bros. Equipment Co. $362,249
9951 Cummins Supply Company $1720965
SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above
competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City
and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public
works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such
person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice
to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and
furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of
j the award of the bid.
II
SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the
construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with
the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts
are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid
i
rl
i
Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms,
conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and
specified sums contained therein.
SjCTION ,LV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above
competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public
works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council
hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the
amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts
executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7th day of March, 1989.
it
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
I
ATTEST:
~ J
I
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYO%ITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i
BY:
BI D2
1
i
t 1
A
DATES MARCH 'T, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TOS Mayor and Members of the City Council
PROMS Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS BID# 9937 - 1988 C.I.P. UTILITIES INCLUDING 6" WATERLINES ON
FOWLER, CAMPBELL, WOODFORD, MONTERREY, W1I S91RE, A14D
BRIARCLIFF STREETS. 4" WATERLINES ON NOBLE AND CHARLES
STREETS. 10" WATERLINE ON DALLAS DRIVE AND 6" SATIITARY
SEWERLINE ON STRAUD STREET
j RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder,
Atkins Brothers Equipment Company, in the amount of $362,249.00.
SUMMAkYt This bid was sent to our complete bid list of water and
sewerline contractors and we received four bids. The bids received were
in line for three vendors, however, the fourth bid was extremely high.
This bid has been reviewed and `he bid is in line with estimates.
BACKGROUNDS Tabulation Sheet, Utility Department and Utility Board
Recommendations, and a Memo from the Engineering Department.
PR03RAI1S, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Utility Department and
Citizen s of Denton
FISCAL IMPACTS There is no additional impact on the General Fund.
Respectfully submittedt
/e e 'I
L1 1 ~
City M ager
Prepared byt
S MARSHL
tl Purchasing 1.geALnt
I Approved:
arshall
it Purchasi MngAgent
005.DOC i
1
I
N
r
I I I I I
BID 1 4971 I I E I
,E I I I
BID 1111E IS88 CIP UTItI11ES / I ATKINS BEDS. DSCKEASON I81L1 NAIEIWDDDI E.L. UALTON I
.EQUIPMENT C I CONSIRUCTIUN I INC, I AND COMPANY I
OPENED OANOARY 21, 1984 ! I CO., INC. I I I
' I
ALCDUNi 1 b23.OOB-D481.91 U iTBbB. I . I I .
• • . . - - - - • ( .............I i
B 1 QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
......-1 1................................ 1 1 L_............I I
~ I 1 i I I I I
I IBASE BID WATER 1 203,261.00 1 230,487,00 1 2211,32S.30 1 3819633,40 E
1 IBASE BID SEWER I 801233.00 1 44,722,30 1 72,645.5$ 1 96,364,10 1
1 IPRIARCLIFF WATER I 65,52D.00 I 75,586.5D I 73,738 30 I 178,307.40 1
1 EDALLAS DRIVE WATER 1 25,235.00 1 28,694.95 1 30,282 .75 1 551710.00 1
I I 1 . E I
I I 1 1 1 I I ~
1 . IBASE BID TOTAL I 271,444.00 ! 2B01209,50 I 500142G,85 I 480,947.50 . ,
2 1 IBASE BID + BRIARCLIFF . 331,414.00 1 355,795,11D 1 3740161,15 1 b091304.90 I
3 1 1ASE BID + B+ DD 1 362,249.00 1 384,490,55 1 404,976.10 1 665,014,90 1 1
1 I I I I I I ~
~ I I I I I 1 . i
I
I
4
I
P
II
I
4
rt
March 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJ: CONSIDER BID OPENING 09937 TO ATKINS BROS. EQUIPMENT CO.,
INC., FOR FY 88 MISC. WATER AND SEWER LINE REPLACLMENT AND
DALLAS DRIVE 10" WATER LINE.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of February 22, 19890
recommended to the City Council award of Bid #9937 to Atkins Bros.
Equipment Co. for replacement of various water and sewer lines at u
price of $362,249.
SUMMARY: {
Bids were opened January 24, 1989. The results are shown on the
bid summary attached. Atkins Brothers Equipment Co., Inc., of
Grand Prairie, Texas, is the lowest qualified bidder with a total
J price of $362,249. aid package included the base bid, base bid
plus Briarcliff water lines, and base bid plus Briarcliff and
Dallas Drive water lines.
BACKGROUND:
Several water lines and one sewer line are included in the bid
opening for replacement. These water lines are old and
deteriorated cast iron pipes and many are located in easements
behind lots. This undesirable location causes high maintenance
costs. After these lines are installed, the City will contract
with a licensed plumber to relocate the private services to the new
mains. The total estimated cost to relocate these services is
$130,000. The Dallas Drive water line is needed to produce the
required fireflow for the surrounding area. The sewer line is an
old and root infested clay pipe. The base bid water and sewer
lines were identified in the FY 88 CIP. Dallas Drive WL was
identified in the FY 87- CIP.
Due to the immediate need for construction, the Briarcliff Water
Line and the Dallas Drive Water Line were included with the bid
package as additive alternates. Recommendation to award these
projects with the bid is made only after determining that existing
funds are sufficient for all projects bid.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEO:
Citizens of Denton, Denton Municipal dtilities, Public Works and
Atkins Bros Equipment Co., Inc.
1
J
Y l
e
SY. '
City Council
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
FY 87 6 88 C1P Budgeted Amts
Water Sewer
Bond $ 30,000.00 $ -0-
Revenue 458 626.60 291 378.34
Total $468:6~6 391:37834
Amount Bid $294,016.00 $ 68,233.00
PLUS estimated amount for Water
Service Relocations $130,000.00 $ -0-
TOTAL Estimated Construction Cost ;424,016.00 $ 68,233.00
Amount over{under) Budget 64,610.60) 1$2231145.34)
Source of Funds: 623-008-0461 - Water Bond
621-082-FA88 - Water Revenue
621-081-FA88 - Sewer Revenue
Resp tfully s itted
i
i
arre ,
Ma ager
Pr ared by, +
av am, rector.,q Water/
Wastewater Utiliti
APP ve by_~ ~..T
R. E. a son, xecu ve rector
Department of Utilities
Exhibit I Bid Summary
11 City Engineer Recommendation
1 Project Location
PUB Minutes of February 22, 1989
I
6325U:14.15
1
I
I
I
C .
' Y
C~d .~~MF,AI
::Ty :F iESTCN
lie9 LTIL2TIES C.1.F,
JT:LITr FELCCATICNS
I
UTILITY
V UT I L I T 0 BASE BID.
U11LITr BASE BID 1 BRIARCLIFF 1
ITEM CCNTRACIOR! BASE 010 BRIARCLIFF DALLAS DR.
i 40. CMU AMOUNT GAYS AMDUNT OATS AMOUNT DAMS BOND `
i ML NAIELOOH. INC. 1311,4ii.SS H 1311,717.15 61 1191,971.11 71 YES
I
RTlINS BROS, 1271.04,11 9 1371.0.11 61 13tk2.:14.x1 71 MES
EOUIFME01 CO.
i E.L. DALTCN ! --•-•-....•••-•••-IIBi,441.'a CI Ib14.3lI, a Si tb85,Z11.4a TI YES
1 C04AY. INC.
I
I' e • tr
1 GICrERSDY CDNSTRUCTION t:B1,a4.Ca .a 1i,5.1i3.B1 ea 1381.195.55 71 YES
COMPANY, INC.
S aTr EN6INEf~1!~6
FI81.ieS.ai l32S.6a2.la 1C1B.191,ZP
I
I ~ I
I
R-wvtj I`
i
.An 18 ff
1
y
{
R Y u 1
t[ ~
L
e
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUN10PAL 8UILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 i TELEPHONE (811) 566.820,
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 1S, 1989
TO: Lee Allison, P.E., Engineering Administrator
FROM: David Salmon, Engineering Associate II
SUBJECT; 1988 C.I.P. Utilities Bid
I
The En ineering Division of Public Works has reviewed the bid
by Atkins Brothers Equipment Company Incorporated for the 1988
C.I.P. Utility Construction. All prices are reasonable and the
bid total is within 101 of our estimate. We would recommend ,
` that this bid be accepted.
Engineering Associate II
0643E
' i
I
E
EXHIBIT.......
1
/
1
1~ .
.r I. rl
I
r
' PWOJE T
J LO£AT
1
IBIT.......
rA
x ti
3
DATES MARCH 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council
i
FROMs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS BID# 9951 - ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION PACKAGE (MATERIALS)
POCKRUS SUBSTATION
RECOMMENDATIONS We recorurend this bid be awarded for the Clark
Substation bld as submitted by Cummins Supply Company for the lcra total
of $172,965.00. This does not include the installation.
SUMMARYs This bid was received and sent to our
prospective vendors and
suppliers for this type of equipment. We received tour replies. The bid
spread was from a low of $172,965.00 to a high of $267,300.00. We feel
this bid is in line and meets the intent of the sl,ecification. The
products are from Clark Substation, the same supplier as the installed
equipment at this substation.
BACKGROUNDS Bid Tabulation, Memo from Rey Wells, Superintendent of
Electric Metering and Substations
t ~
I PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Electrical Distribution
Divie on and the CitiienP Users of the Electric Utility.
FISCAL IMPACTS There is no additional impact on the General Fund.
Respectfull submitted:
I
I
Llo l v'
City Ma ger
Prepared byS
m S 0 1 J. MARSHALL
itl Purchasing r.gent
Approveds
` s J J. Marshall
it s Purchasing Agent
005.DOC
C
l'
i
I I ! I I I
BID i 9951 1 1 1 1 1 i
I 1 I I I I
BID ii1LE ELECIPICA: S551Ai10N PK6. (MATII I I I I 1
1 ..........................................I PRISSIER 1 0I5-TRAM 1 NESCD I ELECTRICAL I CUNNINS I
OPENED 2100 P. N., FESkUARY 23, 1989 1 SUPPLY 1 PRDDUCIS I I IESTIN6 i SUPPLY I
I I I I SPECIALIST I I
ACCOUNT i I I I I I I
I - ._..'•........i ................................I_._...........I_.........._..I. ! I
I ! I 1 !
1 I B1Y I ITEM DESCRIPIIDN 1 VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR 1 VENDOR !
_ L..__.... L.. ...................I...................._.......1 I
l I I ~
f ITOIAL BID 1 192 UOO.DO i 208 716.0, 267,300.00 1 NIB 1 172,965.00 1
I I I I 1 ;
I I I 1 i I I 1 j
I I I I 1 I I 1 I I
I J
fi
I
i
I I
r
1
I
l
--~,A~ - - --_'1
,a r
cnov
Puy,
1969 HO 29 I'll 7: 57
CITY of DENrom, TlXA# 215 E. MCKINNEY/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TE1EPHuNE (817) 566.8200
MDURANDLH
1
Tar Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agee;
FROM. Ray D. Wells, Superintendent of Electric N.etering/Substaions
i
f DATEr February 28, 1989
r SU8,MV: Evaluation Hid #9951 - pockrvs Substation Duplex
f
Bid proposals were opened Febivaiy 23, 1989, at 2 p.m. in the purchasing
Departrnent for the City of Denton, Texas. We received four (4) valid
bid documents and one (1) no bid. The bid tabulation is as follcwsr
1. Cummins Supply Co., Ft. Worth, TX (Clazk Substations);172,965.00
2. Priester Supply Co., Arlington, TX. - ;192,000.00.
3. Dis-Tran Products, Alexandria, Louisianna - $208,316.00
1 4. WESCO, Haltom City, TX - $267,300.00
5. E.T.S., Longview, TX - No Bid
1 recamoA we accept the bid of Clnsmins Supply Co., of Fort Worth,
Texas (quoting Clark Substations) of $172,965.00 low bid meeting
j d cations.
I
r
s
tn
022889248
C
i
M,
i
V
i
i
I
i
f
T= LL I I
:w
1=1 I I I
it
I /
I~
2164L /j.
NO.
AN ORDINANCE: PROVIDING FOR THE FXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES
OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE
SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING
SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code
provides that procurement of items that are only available from
one source, including: items that are only available from one
source because of patents, copyrights, secret processes or
nntural monopolies; films, manuscripts or books; electricity,
gas, water and other utility purchases; captive replacement parts
or components for equipment; and library materials for a public
library that are available only from the persons holding
exclusive distribution rights to the materials; need not be
j submitted to competitive bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to procure one or more of
the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials
equipment or supplies, as described in the "Purchase Orders
attached hereto, are hereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
89093 ANUELL $17.400.00
\ SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above
items she ont constitute a contract between the City and the
person submfl.~.ing the quotation for such items until such
person shall comply with all requirements specified by the
Purchasing N partment.
i
SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute any contracts relating to tha items specified in Section
I and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is
hereby authorized.
1 7,
l
r
FY{
1
SECTION IV. rhat this ordinance shall become effective 1
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989. +
1
I
RAY ST PRENS9 MAYUK
ATTEST:
I +
JEWNUVAMRS9 CITY SECRETARY
I +
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
I
f~
I
1
V
i
DATE: MARCH 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 069093 - ONE SOURCE PURCHASE OVER $10,000
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this Emergency Purchase order to Amwell
for the repair of a clarifier at the water Production Plant.
SUMMARY: This main part drive unit has been shipped to Amwell for
disassemble and repair with the estimated replacement parts of
$17,400.00. We may also have extra parts to completely repair this
unit. 'Phis is a main unit for the clarifier.
i
BACKGROUNDS Copy of Purchase order and repair estimate. This does
E not incline transportation charges.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECT£DS Water Production Treatment I
j and for the Citizens of Denton usage.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional impact on the General Fund.
I
i
Respectfu submitted:
4Hrel
Lloyl
City Manager
Prepared by:
MARSHALL
j l m
tle rchasing Agent
Approved%
rJ~ 2
O?urchja;i~a9 rshaitl Agent {
005.DOC
I
i
i J
1
i
r
CITY OF, DENTON, TEXAS
' 401-BTWSSTREET PURCHASE ORDER DEN TON, TX 76201
P. O. NUMBER DATE/y-NAORNO. DOCUMENT TYP
t AN*,'J:~ ~ F1
YEN~R C 04F I I10'riTP& uNL Y
AF AL
L/I1 'rArTl2 L oASIL rUNIa AjSUr wATEII PI,OLULTIUN
4 Al LINULhv tiUll~ ~A 17.2-0 SPEIsCLH NUAU
JALLAS41A roei% ULNIUNr TLAAS 762,b
ITEM ACCOUNTNUMBER UNITSNUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINEAMOUN
C1 8.17 "d4 G.cJ PJ1o I LT 1TL-11:LLAi0i'lLH ~iLPLACLhILNI 1599LLrt.
u2 4,7 •:4 .•:ZJ +dj4} OXA 11, L;ALLVU!NG URIVL UNII
•.J 8.7 4 ...:U 4) J•1J 1 LI I1LM.:~:0111_I~VZ UNIT HLPAIN 1.:i....r..
LL / `
I
I
1
1
i
l +
1 t
I
i
r
1
The Clty of Denton, Texas to lax exempt-House Bill No. 20. 1 0 T AL I LR P r,1 r l t . 4 r .
I
i~ Reference P.O. Number on all OIL, Shipments and Invoices. i
Shipments are Fr O, B. City of Denton, or as inClcated. gy
a e Voucher Number Amount
r ~ RR. Number Items Received
I
I
1
rl
P, DENTON WTP AMWELL CLARIFIER REHAB.
February 2, 1989
Page 1
ITEM 1. CLARIFIER REPLACEMENT PARTS EXCLUDING DRIVE UNIT
1. Two (2) Collector (Truss) Arms
2. one (1) Drive Cage
3. Four (4) Cage hangers w/attachment plates
4. Two (2) Corner Sweep Mechanisms with Squeeges
5. Eight (8) Flight and Squeeges
6. one (1) Lot of attaching hardware
7. Freight allowed to plant site
Nit Price $15,900.00
i
4 Above equipment to be shipped bare, with no
disassembly of existing clarifier parts.
Loading, installation, finish paint will be
by others.
Adder:
Sand blasting of above items per SP-6 with one (1)
shop coat of 37-177 Tnemec Primer at Factory
Net Price $ 2,100.00 /
ITEM II. DRIVE UNIT REPAIR
_ I
1. Return freight for drive $ 400.00 (est.)
2. Disa&sembly of drive unit at $ 11100.00
Factory including inspections
3. Parts required to put drive unit $
in A-1 operation with full warranty
to be determined at time of disassembly
and inspection, and can only be advised
at the appropriate time.
f
I
1
1
1
Y
_ C
K
x
DATE: February 158Q
FROJECT: DENT ON WTP AIIWELL C'LAPIFIER REHAB.
DENTOII, TEXAS
TO: City of Denton
1701 S Speucer Goad
Or' nt gin, Te::as 76205
Attu: It. Jerry Roush
!
Gentlemen:
Enclosed is our proposal describing the equipment and associated
services we can provide for the project indicated above.
Any adr1itiorial infoi:,ation you may require concerning this
equipment can be obtained from our sales office in your area. The,
address is:
TASEEII FARIII
WATER AND WASTE EIAIIAGE11F.11T ASSOC., II1C.
4341 Lindberg, Ste. 2A
Dallas, Texas 75244
214-387-0530
In the event that n purchase order is issued to WATER AND WASTE
IIANAGEIIEIIT ASSOC. , IIIC. , the attached proposal including the
"GEneinl Terns" and "Standard Conditions of Sale" shall he made
essential parts of the order. Any order submitted to WATER AND
WASTE IIANAGEHENT ASSOC., INC. is subject to acknowledgment by WATEF,
? AND HASTE NAVAGEIIENT ASSOC., IIIC.
We apprn_ciate the opportunity to offer this proposal for your
consideration. Shu+ild yuj have any questions concerning this
proposal, please contact; our ;ales office os indicated above.
Very truly yours,
i ATEP, 41ID WASTE IIAILIGEIIENT ASSOC. , IIIC.
L L
~i11 ~arnes;
Presid~:nt
BC/ss
,1! 1 1 1 X11110 10 . St 11 I I' ;)r1 101 1 115, I L X/15 M,J] (214) 391 1630
4,1 „
{
I
El=
ERB-
{
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ti
DATE: 03/07/89
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
Mayor and Members of the city Council
TOt
FROM-' Lloyd V. Harcea' :ity manager 1
SUBJECTt CONSIDER AD '.LNG AN ORDINANCE RENAMING POCKRUS TO POCKRUS PAGE ROAD
RECOMMENDATION: I
Change name of Pockrus Road to Pockrus Page Road.
BACKS t-'
recoendedheld
i On January 251 1989 the Planning and Zoning commission
that the name Pockrus be retained. (6 to 1) The City
a public hearing on February 21, 1989 and after receiving public
comm to ce renaming Pockrus I
comment instructed staff to prepare an ordinan
1
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OR CROUPS AF_ F~~-'
The Engineering and Traffic Division would be required to correct
eePs and
existing FISC~Tt
The only fiscal impact would be the cost of the map update anm the
I` new street signs.
Res t:Eullx su reds
L d V. Harrell
Prepared byt City Manager
El g Adm
Plnnniainistrator
I '
App t
Fra H. Bobbin , AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
09420
j. i
r!
. i ~
i
y
i
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE
RENAMING OF POCKRUS ROAD TO POCKRUS PAGE ROAD AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the road officially designated as Pockrus
Road by Ordinance No. 87-039, being public road extending from
its intersection with the I-35E Service Road to its intersection
with Swisher Road, is renamed as Pockrus Page Road.
,SECTION II. That the official map of the City of Denton be
amended to show the change in the street name as provided herein.
k SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective ,
immediately upon its passage and approval.
f ~
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
I
tA
ti
141111111111
a
I
I
ILA
I al 4444+1 diddal +i Hid
[NIL I
fl
8
{
ti
1
CITY COUNCIL REPORT (C//Y!Y^'1
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council '
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Award of Aggregate any Individual Stop-Loss Contract to Southern Risk
Specialists, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that Southern Risk Specialists, Inc. be awarded
the contract for Aggregate and Individual Stop-Loss Insurance as re-insurer on
the City's HeaI0 Insurance program for the reasons listed below. They have
agreed to:
o Provide $1,000.000 individual lifetime maximum for each employee
and dependent
o Cover each employee and dependent for a $60,000 individual
stop-loss
o Provide reasonable aggregate stop-loss coverage given our re_ent
experience
o Approve our current claims administrator, August International
o Provide a '15/12' contract instead of a '12/12' contract. (This
i
means the contract would cover claims incurred 3 months prior to
the contract period - 1/1/89 - 3/31/90.)
SUMMARY: Five organizations responded to our Request for Proposal for
individual and Aggregate Stop-Loss insurance. They are as follows:
o Sun Financial Group
o BILBO, Inc.
o Commercial Union Life
u IISI, Inc.
o suuthern Risk Specialists
Only two of the stove respondents were considered in the analysis, kommercial
Union ife and Southern Risk Specialists. BiLBO, Inc. was eliminated since
they would not provide stop-loss coverage without claims processing
administration. Claims administration was not an option listed in the
proposed RFP specification since we are currently using August International
as out claims administrators, Sun Financial Group and IISI, Inc. were not
considered since they would not provide an aggregate coverage quote due to our
past claims experience.
BACKGROUND: The City of Denton requested proposals for its Individual and
Aggregate Stop-Loss coverage in FY 1987/88 in conjunction v< h other health
insurance program contracts, At that time, a contract wak :ded to
Washington National Life Insurance Company. However, due to individual 'shock
claims' reaching a $385,000 level and overall claims exceeding the aggregate
deductible by $193,155, Washington National's renewal quote on November 10
4 1988 would have placed a significantly greater risk on the City's insurance
fund, Their renewal contract increased our individual stop-loss from $60,000
to $150,000 and our aggregate stop-loss from $837,874 to $3,173,087. The
employees Individual lifetime maximum was also decreased from :1,000,000 to
$250,000 thereby significantly reducing the overall benefit to employees, Due
to the unfunded liability the City would incur, it is in the best interest of
the City to select another carrier and award a contract with less risk and
greater benefit,
J
:
r
f
City Council Report
Stop-Lose contract
Page 2
i
PPOGF.AMS, DEPARIMENTS OR _GROUPS AFFECTED: City 8ee7th Insurance Plan
FISCAL IMPACT: $107,781
I
P,espec ully submitted: +
i
i
Lloyd V, Harrell, Ci y Manager
j ^ Prepared by: Approved:
f j` 1
__X ww~
Thomas N. lin0o hector Betty Mclean, Ex cutive Director
Personnel/Employee Relations Municipal SeIvicea/Economic Development ,
I
5228P
020689:0835
k
I
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS 215 E. MCKINNEY I DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 666.8200
H E M 0 F. _L N D U M
TO: Betty McKean, Executive Director
Municipal Services/Economic Development
FROMI Thomas W. Klinck, Director
Personnel/Employee Relations
DATE: Fcbruary 2, 1989
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT TO SOUTHERN RISK SPECIALISTS FOR AGCPEGA7E AND
INDIVIDUAL STOP-LOSS COVERACR
I
Thla memo outlines the recent responses to the request for proposal for
1 aggregate and individual atop-loss coverage.
~ ~ Background
The City of Denton requested proposals for aggregate and individual stop-loaa
coverage In FY 1987/86. Subrequentlyi the contract was awarded to Washington
National Life Insurance Company. However, due to the amount of 'shook claims'
for 1987/88 1$365,000) and exceeding our aggregate deductible (4835,874) by
$193,155.78, Washington National increased our individual atop-loss deductible
from $60,000 to $150,000 on November 1, 1988. In addition, our aggregate
deductible was increased from $637,674 to $3,473,087 and the employees
lifetime maximum was decreased from $1,000,000 to $250,000, effective
November 1, 1988.
Due to the unfunded liability the City would incur, it is in the best Interest
of the City to select another carrier and award a contract with less risk and
greater benefit,
Analysis of Propoaa11
Five organizations responded to our request for proposal for aggregate and
Individual stop-loss coverages
o Sun Financial Group
o BILBO, Inc,
o, 1181, Inc.
o Commercial Union Life
o Southern Risk Specialists
I
I~
h
e
f
i
i
z
` Memo - Betty Mcxean
Aggregate/Individual Stop-Loss Contract
Page 3
o They will provide a $1,000,000 individual lifetime maximum for each
employee and dependent
o They will cover each employee and dependent for a $60,000
individual stop-loss
o They will provide reasonable aggregate stop-loss coverage given our
recent experience
o They have approved our current claims administrator, August
International
o They will provide a '15/12' contract instead of a '12/121
contract. (This means the contract would cover claims incurred 3
months prior to the contract period - 1/1/89 - 3/31/90.)
Cost
The cost for providing the basic service plus the transplant rider is
approximately $107,781 (see attachments 1 and II), The following chart
compares Washington National's projected individual stop-lose premium to
Southern Risk's individual stop-lose premium. (Please note that Southern
Risk's premium is based on 705 participants with a $60,000 stop-loss and
Washington National's premium is based on 705 participants with a $150,000
individual stop-lose.)
I
j
4 Individual
Projected coat Stop-Loss Number of
company 11/01/88 - 10/31/89 Amount Participants
Washington National $ 42,919 $150,000 705
Southern Risk $107,781 $ 60,000 705
Therefore, the increase in premium is offset by the lower deductible. For
examples
o A $150,000 claim under Washington National would be paid entirely
by the City
o A $150,000 claim under southern Risk - city would be reimbursed for
$900000 ($1500000-=600000)
In projecting revenues and expenses in the insurance fund for the FY 88/89
budget year and subsequent five year projections, approximately $1150000 has
been budgeted each year to cover stop-lose insurance rates. These budgeted
projections were also used in setting the current employee and dependent rate
structure. Thus, the cost of this program is in line with current budget
\I projections for FY 88/89.
If you have any questions, or need additional inforration, please let me know.
Thomas W. k
5228P
022789x0925
J
~I
ATTACHMENT I
AGGREGATe AND INDIVIDUAL STOP-LOSS ANALYSIS J
Sun* Commercial IISi~ Southern HMO 11
Financial Union Life Risk
I I I I (
Aggregate Stop-Loss I Did not provide a E $9680444 1 Did not provide a 1 $1,631,3'7 i $1,985,878
I quote ) I quote 1 1
I 1 1 I I I
I 1 I ( I
Annual Aggregate Coat( Did not provide a I $ 20,3884* 1 Did not provide a 1 $ 24,758*O* 1 S 14,0436**
quote I (12/12 contract) I quote I (15/12 contract) 1 (15/12 contract)
i I I 1 1
~ I )
~ ! I 1
Individual Stop-Loss 1 $105,435 I $108,948 I $1241383 1 $ 77,832 I $ 98,838
(600000)4 1 f I f
1 I f I 1
I I I I Will provide stop-loss
Administrative Costs I None ( None I None I None lonly if awarded claims
( I I I ladministration contract
l I I I I
Transplant Rider I None ( None ( None I $ 50161 ( None j
I I i
~ E I I I f I f
Total Administrative ( $1050435 I $129,363 I $124,383 f $ 1070781 I $ 1120801
Cost f I I I I
I I I I I I
*Did not meet RFP specifications
4612/12 contract would only pay for claims incurred and paid during the contract period
***15/12 contract would cover claims incurred 3 months prior to contract period but paid during contract period
(4/1/89-3/31/90) j
♦See attached sheet for cost breakdown
I
5240P
f ~ 0206890855
1 I
I
I
I~
1
1
r ,
t.
I
l
ATTACHMENT 11
1
AGGREGATE AND INDIVIDUAL STOP-LOSS ANALYSIS COST BREAXDOWN
Sun Commercial IISI Eouthern 6ilao
Financial Union Life Risk
I I 1 I I
Individual Stop-Lose I I I 1 1
Calculation I
I
Employees - 705 1 4.86 - 3426.30 1 4.21 - 2968.05 I 6.34 - 4469.70 # 9.20 - 6486,00 1 5.51 - 3884.55
I I I I
Spouse - 78 1 10.60 - 826.00 1 12.78 - 996.84 I 11.14 - 868.92 I 1 7.79 - 607.62
! 1 I I !
Children - 117 1 10,60 - 1240.20 1 12.78 - 1495.26 1 11.14 - 1303.38 I I 7.79 - 911.43
1 ! 1 ~ I
Family - 213 1 15.46 - 3292.96 1 16.99 - 3618.87 1 17.48 - 3723.24 1 1 13.30 - 2832.90
1 1 1 I 1
I 1 1 I 1 ~
Annual Individual I 1 I i !
Stop-Loss Premium I $105,435.30 I $106,948.20 1 $124,382.80 1 $ 77,832.00 1 ! 98,830,00
I I I
~ I I 1 1 I I
Transplant Rider I None I None I None 1 $ 50161.00 1 None
- I 1 1 I I
Aanuel Aggregate # I I 1
f
Coat I $ 0 I $ 20,388.60 ! $ 0 I $ 24,787,80 1 3 140043,60
1 1 I - I 1
Total Annual Cost I $105;435.30 ! $129,336.80 1 $124,382.80 1 $107,780.80 1 $1120881.60
*Composite rate
I
524GP ;
01308910150
Et
E J
1
it
i
S F I
2646L
NO.
r
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN APPLICATION TO
ENTER INTO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND SOUTHERN
RISK SPECIALISTS INC. FOR A STOP LOSS POLICY; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
1 SECTION I. That the Mayor is authorized to execute an
appl caion to`enter into a contract between the City of Denton
and Southern Risk Specialists Inc. for a stop loss policy, under
the terms and conditions contained in the specimen of said
policy, a copy of which is attached hereto.
I
SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme at3~ a yu po n its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989.
I
RAY STEP ENS, MAYOR
i
ATTEST:
I
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: l^*.~r d may
I
4
i S
LEXINGTON INSURANCE CONIPANY
200 State Street
Boston, bfassachusetu 02109
EXCESS LOSS INDEMNITY
APPLICATION
i
The Applicant is applying for a policy providing the insurance specified below.
I. Name of Applicant CITY OF DEMN
Address 324E Nckinney Denton Texas Zip Code 76201
j Type of Business - HuniciDalitY
Other Locations Yes No X
i
If yes, specify all locations
A
2. Plan Administrator --August International
Address _1054~i._Ssatrel 1400. D~tr,leXaa Zip Code 75206
` 3. Broker South•.re R Syecialiats~ Inc.
Address 1499 at)t='UxA& • Suits 1820- D&I as, TX - Zip Code 75201
4. Initial Enrollment .__.__.IflS-__ Minimum Enrollment 599
(A) SPECIFIC EXCESS INSURANCE
'
S
(1) Spec'sfic Retention Amount per Covered Person for die 60,000
Policy Year
(2) Limit of Liability S 940,000
(3) Reimbursement Factor _ 100
(4) Month)y Premium Rates Payable per Covered
Unit for the Policy Year
Composite Basis 0 Single/Family Basis $ 9.20
(S) Monthly Optional Transplant Endorsement Rate
Payable per Covered Unit for the Policy Year S tt~A
k 03 In
{
r
I
a
(B) AGGREGATE EXCESS INSURANCE
(1) Monthly Aggregate Retention Amount Factor S 288.68
(2) Anticipated Annual Aggregate Retention Amount $ 2,442,233
(3) Minimum Aggregate Retention Amount s 2,075,897
(4) Limit of Liability $ - 1_1000,000
(5) Reimbursement Factor 100 %
(6) Monthly Premium Rate Payable per Co\ered
Unit for the Policy Year S 2.93
(C) MINIMUM PREMIUM S 87,227
(D) COVERED BENEFITS
IS Medical 0 Dental 0 Weekly Indemnity
0 Prescription Drugs 0 Other
(E) PAYMENT BASIS
0 Incurred and Paid ❑ Paid CS Other 15/ 12 - 3 month Run In
1 (F) Endorsements
I
0 Optional Transplant ❑ Other
i
3. Proposed Effective Datf. subject to Lexington acceptance.
I '
6. Deposit of S 37 , 759 Is enclosed to apply to the first PaYme et under the Policy if issued.
Date at , the day of 19
Ir4vhl! of !;Put Lim Licomw
E
I
h
rrr
fA
S
southern risk specialists inc.
hN, 662 9713 Im Bryan s1'nt
ha, 670 0067 Toll ?5701 121,1 4A 770-O091
M
t214) 951-0
036M I
DV QED t CTM9! or Do?= J
ADCF=81 321 L. MlCKDMI DIDNICV, T'EM 76201
_ CC►VER ~ ! TEM E-Ek)C'IIVE DATE EXPIRATICN Mn
864 2231 60 DAYS E/1,/89 x/1/89
IMOTUL EtdiOLTlg2nt 706 ? na" F LTJCM?TPt 599 f
Owurs" is s If Homy applicable to the category for vhich a produa rata is 1
Premium rata is abown, coverage is not Provided for that
category.
(A1 6PM7t MO ERC2B8 nViPA"
(1) Specific Retention AMMMt per Covered Parson
for the Policy you ~_~~0.000
(2) Limit of Liability
(3) PAit ursaMt ractor 5--~Q~---
Monthly Ratu Payable mite
for the Policy you single 1
(5) M
Payab onthly Optional rrawlant DAorslepeent Pats 1
(H} nle Paz t for the Policy Year 0 _ N/A
(1) Monthly Aggregate Retention Amami Factor S
Anticipated Atuatal Aggregate Retention nmoktt ii2,=33
(3) Wniaam to Retantti100 Amamt AD
(4) L.Wt of Liability
(5) Ralmbursemaopeotor i 1.000!_ 000
(d) Monthly Premha Rate Payable per owezM Unit
for the Policy Year 4 2.f3/P
(c) XMIMM PPIXIM
(D) ONE= B XIMFI1g
Mledical ( ) Dental O Weekly Imsamity ( ) Prescription Drugs
PA DM BASIS
and PySd ()Paid oth.r~s/1s - 3 Me~mr M7Y nr
(n (
ZNXFSDQM
( ) CPtiooai 7ftisplant ( ) other
(C} Oonditioms preceynt to the binding a coverage under this Cover
?ote ~at►.s vans 2
(s? AMMMgrMpA OF BEMhT Pb
IY1101,1 F~wawrw w+~•w•
I
"is Dorm Mote states the ovmrage provided by the y
data of issuance, sutrjeot to YOUCY teams and oonditioos,ando4shalthel be
tically
no event shal cancelled and s4erseded by the Policy tort issued, ra
event this Oowr lioke remain in eftset for a Period is excess
of sixty days troy the Effective Date specified above,
f~YA '4
multi-market professionals
BRANCHES IN HOUSTON i TUNA
. y
k
w.
oCanoallationi This Over Note may be OMmIled by situ the IMAM
Pant by ad moo written Notice to the other. In
of "r4*11atiam, the sanwd premium will be rink evstt
rate
oaqvW ly ~
Cw442e4 by tics aastuyd wA PrO rata If canoa
if Ocapany.
RPOM I SOV M P= SPOCU : rM, Dc.
NXF=8i 1999 BWN 9i7tP O w M 1820, Ci UAS, 7B1018 75201
Dated at SOVl9Mw RM Spec,= a this 19M day of JA4M" 1989
riz 8igaaturs
E
1. Information that we$ requested on the proposal of 11/18/88.
2. Surplus Lines Tax and Stamping Pee
i
i
k
i
I
i •
i
t
a
d
a ~
5 4
I
I
LEXINGTON INSURANCE: CONIPANY
2101 SlAo titrect
lies ton St Iss.li husetts 02 1109
I
M I SS LOSS INDI SINlll PO[ ICI
In:on%idcralinn of the paNment of promium. the siawnienh in ;he appiicati, n. a cop} of Ahich is attached to a,,,,
made a p.in of Ibis Pok%. and %uhject to the tcrim.eondiiinns, and h,nimdons ofthis PulioA erinjton Insurunee
Comp,jns. herein called the Comp,tm. does insure:
in.rrc.l, Polies r
Address,
I'he:intr,i~mcnlnfrremntmisJuein ll '~turhrlorctheFflectisehaicshouninthrSrheduleandallolhrr
j premiums arc due tnd paNahlc I
n the Payment ul' Premiulns rrosision chile the Polio is in forec,
the PolieN Year shrill begin indP" aT I: 111 a rn St:mJard lime ut the address ol'the rnnciral on)" oClhe
Named In•urcJ
i
i i
Countersigned at, By:
-_~---------------------~-----Authonred fterresenmiive
Data.
SA flu) a•S'
ti
{
13 1
r °
I - 11F11\I I[I)\S
1 5 1 \I I I I 111. 1,11+„ eJll';d Ilse 1'I,I 111 Illa',111+ Ihi l1i 11.1fe hi I;elli, IhC \.11111,! 1i1•]'C I II,I, .I,'rei .I to p1UI kEl' ll lldef
,r p1,, ,I hi nitlt, 11v thi l,xere,E I nip+. ,I, dclillrJ In nc~ 1+rirtcn r:'r n1 :,1 ,'11,11 ,'LI❑. 1khi,h i, in efleet r, 111h; I. t1 rC.
I),I I; 111 IIIP I'l III 111. !1d111e d11 IlMclid rll Crlr, t,1 •11111 1!,
Is} \I i l I PI is. P\1 \II \ U11\ fNs I kkl I, \\I)
I V11) 1l V~1111';.Iil~ i rd I',I,11 1.,lr.Ihi fn1J dllli'llr'I
ir,t,l lkhlJl1,11errd l n17.11r 1 1;' ,I I'r111 P,!•;+ ,rn: I tlli'i;,l ti n,lirthi Kirl,u!- C,?!I,,Ins llmltdrr,n,I,f
1','II„ "IIt ,lull,unt,lIt hL1%111 Ill 1111,nh III, iu,1C the I II_i; Ii I NL~;n,i, II%ui ll on nr,lkir lh. f R~.!i1c D,ue
Ii ] rlll,, Iht i`17, iitl nJ tt, 1',hCl It t ~uih nttl'tlni l,!' Ir'I•,h,!li ri 111:1!1d l rJl.i rin, it r. i nC
li1,, 111 111, ,11111 i \I~, I ,11 I!I+\I }7k ,I?i 11 U! ri lkllIN llr , i It Cr 1!'l 1l rIII, , nt e lr r+illtl! Ir 11111!1 kl;
C,e+Ilk lli,'1jI IIIrl)i'1r+,11`Ik I,'•In,irl Ih1r„I!It.i \1,ik1,.1.;,Luntpe„n;rrmllrill,c71,i11'I!rl~.lulln„h,llihe
u-..1..1id \n ! 1 I dpi n,; '.,.LI bi i1'n,I,tlrl: til hi IniurrC, II hme t11 ,irnt,,•. , ?hc +uprlk In Ilhilh u
c'.r;, I+pr„IIJe,i IIe1'i„n ihr. • I,•u;II ,hIlI bC L untc,1.IN 1111 l.uJill id .In1f'h' l).ue1'l l,+
uildc.llh I
, r,1lr„r
1•; ,k1v.1Cd Ihi ,{,Iti 1.i , nl ntl
1)111 OI IVv1 E n1;.In,IIII., L'„t11nr.iuln„b;l rIt :1,II IlelhC CII,i, i•r,li,feJ
tIC k: 111, IN 1r J!.111 I, kfCilI. Cle,t 1 iIIll hairI n+ 1hr hakri ,IrIJ 1•,11,1 h, the hdnh uP11n klhiih n I+ ,.r lkut
ILI(kliilII\}'!NN NI 11111,1r:,tl';,h,11,YIIhunll:rr1;I'I1111sitI';
Ilse, I51h„ I'' 111!1, u1k 117nIt,111 11,
( ( 1\ I kl 11 I \11 !111.1 l', ,'I, ,I?I i' 11111. I: CI jl 11,\ii ,111,1 III, hi f .l1 i,i [Id, p!•. 11r •11; i1 i1i r' ,11112,1 J?',I! '
:r1.,1 ui`•', 1•C'lk.l'r1 ,I'a l 1tII IIl 1:'.11 ti. A',:In1 1''•.oed
AI A4H1kuI (1111 k1ItI is IlNIIIk 11 ,Ihkt1~1.11nL r.hc[1q(I,11: ,11 n.IIn !1Cis"I,+tl1IIa11 11,,•
! \ I 11 l l'r ID h ~ ' I
I1 I!r I' I nr II 1 n1 ;h; I
II + I l I'I nl
11 k f:I fl l'f f',11\ V~1
" 1
J
11111 11 I I I
\I
F \
' III 1 ,
i
\;1, 111(1 u,,
' I [:I l1 \1I kl TI 111\ 010I '.I 1 1
I \1 \ . 1',n III, r
VI"I \11 \I 111. 111 \ I t RI 11 V j ,\li ll \IE _,u,• h I. W,, ,
AV\I VI 11 1hf(IA1I R111\it,IA VAtill\1 1', 1,
'1E ri lhh 1 k I, \r In I li
j, 1
\I'I • III kf I I \'I k I\ \\11)1 \ I . Iri. U,; !:I•,.
1\Ii I, II 7•'1(,'11\ ri id!Il„'.
iJ Ir,•tr!.,i,i: li,l l Iir,,~r 7 tlli I'111.:. l;,,r
I Iis 11I 111 111II II II1 n'C,111 !Ili .II11 1'.1 y`1,oi;k1 01 1 L, 11 1J V11111 IN: Il0 1,k ltndit IL1,
I 1110 \,I 1111 Ir1.11red 1I,r tlli I'1'ltc, 1:.Ir
R1 [\Ilil'R\1 \11 \ I I \l MIN 111C.111, rni +r„III,I I 111.1m) 111 th1 \alld.ll, '.kl?Ik 11 ulll liitcrm;ni Ills I,dl it
'Inikll 111111 All 1.111111111 I. I,Ih11111 N1IIi II 1\111 hl h 11,1 In Ihi \1111111 Iv sI,l rl',i Ill I%l r,l ii R e l it l hu r,i l i l e rl l I I, ItI Ill,tl
IPr;l eat 11 1,1 the g reg0 ii I~\lc„ II,ur,I nll .nVd \I`C e111i 1 \l e„ II7,Ufd n,i.
\'~\11 DI"s KII)nIe.In,Ihelu+lu'edn,I111CkIiit IhI , INiII %or.1 ni IlLilt C1I.II`!I,hrJMotlorthet;nne,lJilin r.•,l
under the fic ne 111 PE.11I
11011( 1 I \R meaii +Ihe pc ru,.t Irr,it 1 1'_III ;I nI Ssutd Il IIrlle;Ii the aIId ri,+o1 IN nnclr.,Iot'ticeot'the N.Intrd
In,ured on the I Iti'ctil: D,Itc 1u E'ul 1 m Si. inklard Iinn. at the ;I,Iit re of the principal III1icr ul'the \';Inikkl
Inured an the I.IiIi line D.oe ao, iderltitial in the Schedule.
1( 11VIFLY Al WORK n1e.Ins thin the enlrlo}cc i. perfilrnin~ full time all rceitUr duties of his or her normal
olixup,rtion on the UP"lile Date of this PUI1e) or on his ur her List rccufarl! .cheduled uorkdul prior to the I'flec-
tile D Itc 411, this llohIll
i(fI \Li]' DISUit 16 nie.lru that the inJlliduul is hospilal confined or is unahlc to cnpvc in the normal
achutiel nl it rer,on in ,,lod hcilth of h1,c uge ;Ind %e11.
I
J
LL\LNGION INSt R k%CL Comf),%m
_INl Stare Slrcel
Burton. \I•I nih~ ell+fl: ~f )
f Sl II1 IN I I - E,~:e s Luss
Indcmnily Pidic~
I\sl'R11)
IDDRIss POLIIS'
II I1('111'F OAT E:
E.\PIRAI'ON
DATE
1\11111 F,N'ROI L\1F,A'I
\tlNl\Il \I FNROLL\IFN'r.
( u+er,ige Is I~niy al,pli:ehlr to the:arci!un tor l+hi:h a pr:miunt rat~ ~
I rrnera~c i~ nlI pro ded f u Ih•tt t,neg1 in s i ho i% ❑ hel ms
. II nu premium r,ue i~ c}loun.
111 SPF l'II I( F S( F 'IS INS[ R:\N(
f 1 I I lirvollc kii, ntlnR r\l itm; rcr l i!t t'fiil fee r")f1 tor rhd Pl it li+ ~t,lr
S
1_ntlrt nl L.l,ihihl+
131 Rcimhurscnlent 1;lcrnr
I i lal \L~nthl~ Prrmluln k•ire t1•ri~ - - ~
Ie pcr ln
lc n•d I'nil ri,r Ills Pulic+ h;lr
II i I 1 ( nmllowLe B.r i. I I Sin ie I amrh B,Li - -
' E ICI Mnnrhl+ (I,ti,~ 1
I n,lllr,in•pl,nlfrldcrI Itep+++.ihicpcr 1
( u+rrnl l'nil for the Pnh,:+ lcar
f 181 1liGkl (i I1F. 1 .\l l SS L\Sl'k~l t
V S
111 \I inr111 AL!greg,nc Kct,ar' !
' I • nl -m or
'I \nrrcipafcdAnnu• tckcrentilln,\mauitt
s i
:I ..\hllimum 1gcreg,ite Rcrrntinn i-_~---
Anl,alnl
eJ, Lintilul'Liuhiht%
l
`i kcimhursemenr F• k:tor - - 1
IN \luntlik Premium Rarr I'a~ahk Per t'u+crcd ('nil
Jor the Pulic~ Ye•Ir
ICI \1IK1\1l'M PRE\fIl'\i - -
S-__----_
t!)I CUI'FRE) BE NI I-FlS
1 F Aiedical 1 I Dental I 11'cekk Inlfemnir! ( 1 Prescription Drug 1 1 Other
IF.I F'•11'AIFNIBASIS
I I Incurred and pjkl ( ) P,lid
If t lOlhcr
IFl LNDORSE\1r.NTS
4 l I OP(ional Transplant I I Other
k (('r> AD\11NISIRATOROF BE1F'.lIrPLAN
I 1
i
h
t
rA
u
e
II - SPE('IFI(' FSCESS I\Sl R\N(F.
\ the ('onys.ul~ skill ra%. suhjeet to the terms, conditions and hmn.i ions of this Policy, the Specitie Fxcess
Ficncfif, il;ins, to file N;mud Insured within si\h IMII du)s after ac.xrl,+n:r M the Cnmpan} nl the pnxlfnf loss
.r;,l proof of p.i~mcnt of benefit, under the Kin
fi the Sprcllic I Vecss Benefit for the Pohcs Yea nn Iraitikln 111irea+t L% the Benoit Plan Rq meets On An Incurred
\11.1 Paid Kims t+ I a (oscred Person Icss the tirecilk Retention \mount. multiplied h\ the Reirrlhursenlcnf
l actor and non c\cecdinc the Limit of I w1bibr% specified under Specific }.secs Insurance in the
zLchedulc.
1' t Cowcul Pcnnn incurs I.ligihle I`\pcnses. a sincle Spccitic Rele noon Amount shall apply for such Covered
Person to (hose I'ligihlc p.\perlses which ire incurred and paid during the Policy )'car.
III - \CCRtGIIF FV ISS I\SI R\\CF:
\ \rter file end of the Nslic) )'ear, Icrnunation, or cancelljo-in, the C omrany skill ray to the Named Insured ncc
errc.ite I \ccss Benefit if a ns, u+thin si\rk l fOI d,ns o Rrr that Cunlram s ❑ciepwnee of the prkx,l'o1 loss ;+nJ
pnkof of p,r\nlcnts of henrtin under the Plan. suhjee( to the terms. c,.,nJililms, and limitation- of this
P•,lii~.
It I he Acerccrte I \cc- Hcneili for the Pohes )ear or traction thereof is the Benefil Plan Pa%mew, On An
Incurred 1nkl Paid 10 is. Ices t I) the Anrual A;•gree,ilc Rclenuon :\mounf. and 121 the Srecilic F\cesq l l
which has hccn or will he reimbursed h} The( ompany under the Srecilic FweNs Insurance, multiplied by the
Reinlhursimenl l JOW ;1nd nnf c\ceedulg the 1 innl of I Lihilils specified under Aeoregate F \cess Insurance in
II r;1i 5ihekhrli
c
I1 - 1\111 \Itll\1 OF (O\ }.R \GF'.
\ I h (,'nlpan\ h,ts nn responsiNhi% or nblic,own under This Polies to relnlhur,c dircetl% an% (owed Pcrson
rr ruder k Iprote- ori,kl or medical ko%1ees I1rr am bendits \k hi Ch the \urncd Insured has agreed to firm idc I
ttdcr I1w icr111, of the I'i.fn, I he Company's sole Ii,'&Jhll hereunder is to the Named Insured. subject :U the
wrens. c,ntdwon., and llnut•itions ul'the Polls%
t
B 1' a Cosercd Person is not Acui cl) At Nork or i•~ Disabled on the I-ffeefise Date of this Policy. lligihlc
I\peose.shAl.includennhthn,Ce%pcn614T irThedaleihecoleredPersonreturns toAorkfull-time
Of the fotat D7salsiht\ cods, and the rson melts the clieihihiN requirements of the Plan.
( - %crage of c \pen,c% for the tred(r»ttl :rod Ncnous Condition, H limited to S'71)(lllfl) In cwc\s of
'^c tireiorii RrIellUnll \111i,tJ~{ 1 - F SCIS SIO\S (~/Jq
Ihn PolRS will not rei mbarse the Nailed Insured for an% loss or v\pcn,v caused hs or resulting, from an\'
of the following.
I F vper1;Csrineurred while the Platt is not in foTcC.
E~rensisresultinglmmthcrmsisionotwcekl~iniomeFcniriuoranydcnful.\isian.hearing.orrresrripriun
drug program, unless spccilically endorsed hereon,
1 I_iahilitl assumed by the Named Insured under any comr.ici or cenice agreement other than the Plan.
1 a. }.\penscs which arc based upon am noncompliance Nith am legal statute or regulation.
i, f.~penscs resulting Crum pen lies or suprlies which are not mcdic;flly neeChsan, are in e\eess Of the usual and
customan charge for the locality where administered. or are in excess of the Plan henefts,
h L%renus for any accidental hodily injure or sickness for which (he Covered Person would he entitled to
hnefits under an} Worker's Compensation or Oecupationul Disease policy whether or nor such policy is
actually in force.
7. Cost OfthcadministrJ00I`1ofclaimsorothersenicelslprovidedh) theadministrator,consultingfeesorexpen-
seLs of any litigation,
9. With remelt to each Co\ercd Person who is eligible for henelo under Medicare, a henel otherwise pa} able
under this Policy shall he reduced by the amount of any similar Medicare knerit so that the total reimbur-
sements hereunder on behalf (if If C-a\ercd Person shall not exceed one hundred pcrcenr(I00%)ofthe Covered I
Person's aclual e\penses. It will he conclusively presumed that each Covered Person eligible for henefits under
Medicare hecinne co\ercd for all pons of Medicare to which he or she is entitled on the earliest possible date
and illereafler maintained such cn\erige in force.
j
9. Expenses resulting from the commission tit' a crime or an illcgul act,
10 E!xpenscsincurred in connection vithasuicide or any irile ntion.illysell-tntlictcdinjun or illness. Ahether the
Cowed Person Acre sane or insane when ne or she committed the art.
II Expenses kirexpenmenialprocedures. drugs, or rcwarchstudiea.orforartyserxices or supplies notconsiJered
legal in the United States.
12 . Expenses incurred by a lire organ donor unless the donor is a Coxered Person under this Policy. Expenses ofa
Ime organ donor shall not he consiJercd as eligible expenses at the organ recipient. unless the donor is A ithout
insurance, in Ahich case, a ntuximum of 551100 shall be considered as Eligible Expenses of the
recipient.
13 Expenses resulting from heart, lung. heart-lung, liner or pancreas transplants unless spccitically
endorsed hereon.
11 - POLICI' TE.RSIINA'f ION
The Policy and all coxcragc hereunder Aill icrminure upon the earliest of the fullovoing
A The Expiration D.nc of this Policy,
B Termination Date under the terms of the Payment of Premiums provision.
C-. Cancellation dale under the terms of ILe Cancellation pro%ision
D. the Date of termination of the Plan, of
F Cancellation of the acreetnent hetwcen the Named Insured :rnd the administrator unless the Company has. I
prior to such cuncell ition, (11 agreed in Aritoly to the Named InsurcJ's designation of a successor udminis•
trator and (11 recciscd a cop, of the agreement hctAcen the Named Insured and the Successor '
adminictramor
I
\11 - CONDI[IONS
I
PREMIUM, 1hepremium hasis..nd rarestor this Policy Ail] tied in the Schedule. Upon termination ofthk
i Policy. the earned premium shall he computed in accord, the premium and exposure basis shcAn in the
Schedule. If the earned premium exceeds the premi~u,~ a Named Insured shall pay the excess to the Com-
pan%; if Icsc, the Company shall return the uncor c\t of the premium paid to the Named insured subject to
the minimum premium, it one, shunn in t ale.
MINIMUM PREMIUSt: The Minimu: payable Ail] he the amount shoAn in the Schedule or. in the
went of termination or cancellation, the~o all monthly premium rates payable. multiplied by the Minimum
Enrollment shoAn in the Schedule mul:ip]icd by the number of policy months.
PAYNI LNT OF PREMIUMS: Premiums are due in adsance, on the tirst d,,y of each month, A period oRilieen 1191
days Aill he granted for pay mein of each premium. dunng Ahich period the Polic% Aill continue in force. Should a
premium otherAisc clue not be paid during such period. this Policy Aill terminate'Ailhout further notice on the dare
the unpaid premium Aas due.
DATA REQUIRED the Named Insured Aill maintain adequate reenr& acceptable to the Company and proxide
any information required by the Company to administer the Policy, The C ompamy ma) periodically examine any
of the Named lnsured's records refuting to the insurance under the Policy and any claims tiled under the
Plan
CLERICAL ERROR, Clerical error, Ahether by the Named Insured or by the Company in keeping an) records
pertaining to the coscragc. still not inxalida(c cowage othensise xalidly in force or continue coverage othcruise
1 xalidl) terminated
ASIENDNIVNTS TO TIES POLICY: This Pulic% may be amended at an) time Aiih the mutual consent of the
Company and the Named Insured,
ASIEND,41E'.NTS TO THE PLAN AND ADMINISTRATIVE A(jREESIENT: The Named Insured Aill proxide
the Company Aith a copy of the Benef it Pla n, The Plan shall not he changed A hile this Pc lie), is in force Aithout the
pnorurittenconsent of the Company. Notice ofamendment to the Plan must hegivento the Company in uritingat
?W State Street. Boston, Massachusclts.0:109. at least thin) -one f311 days prior to the Efl'ecti%c Date of the amend-
ment In the went that the Company does not consent to the amendment, the Company shall he liable to pay
benefits hereunder as if the Plan had not been amended. Furthermore, the Named Insured Aill proxide the Com.
pan% voith a copy of the Named Insured 's AriHen agreement and all amendments thereto with its Administrator:
and the Named Insured agrees that a copy of any future aniendmcnis to or change in that agreement shall he pro-
f aided In the Company prior to the time it hcromcs effective.
NOI ICE' For the Purpose of any notice required front the r: ompany under the r roxisions of this Policy. notice to
the Named lnsurcd shall he omsidcrod notice to the Adminisir,itnr
i
r
4
1
( Z
'
9p
a.
\1►\II\I6,IkitI10\ 01 LA1\1SI ND[R IHI 1'I.1\:
I I1,; \ nnC.l IIT lili d sh,lll un,krl.ll•.' it .III lime, Li en;rl,i% the of m .,\Ilnlini"tr.oor, %ho hall he
!:elne,! Ihi \0111! ,+I th; ImOd hl,urid
Ii•; \,lcnln,Ir,u r. a.rin: „n !,ih,1!f the \,u liil lll,IIIVJ. hale
v•; Ihi aJnlini,lr.ll„ n ,u,l ,I,i~u~t',nnl ,It ,Ill i1.1n1 ,1 C,1 Brit) t'ee ;riiurJis Jnd olnlpuf,aiwl
.ail .I min,.
+1MMIJn11 ,l"Lil,lti rr.nrJ, 1,1 del il.n nt~ p.i)nknl,, 1
0C the 1, 4 1n111.111, wiIn I,, lore tl e l 31h 11.IS ute,lill In,tdlen pi Iis% nhmlh.(in J reporling GIT ill µ1p.
h,.rf 111 Ihi' f,Oill1'.1111 Ills 11 Ill, slllly Jai%- ,1, ri,re"1, Ill: IIli lniJl,1!els preeccklsuy pi+hcs Illi`illll
\,unhiI of ( ulcri,l 11111, J \nnl',lit k 1 1'.1 id .lain.
P1:IIIt1111I p.11d 1twooll! Ill ,lepotil• nwde to lurk]
' k:!irnn'71 \n1, 111171 h Is In„11 nt , ll rl l'J ld praee"seJ il,llill" (in h.lnd
d ,urinl,e hInJ111,'ill llIC il,Ilefit P1011 hl Ole N,auC,l Ill'Ur01l
Vl DI I I hi C lnnpdnl 1''1.111 Ii.I1,L the n_;hl 110Ili'l e.l Ural tudil,,l1 r,,wd,anJ prKeslures(ll the N,Imed Insured
I', li,tnrinl,Ir.It1'r and n, r,,h('rc.',+r.ill r;,Iui,n.I'n),+t IIt 3c0„1J1loli,li,,t,,rn'r,ihe Covyp orf 1h,It palnleni h;o I
n,,'lr :~I 1111 I'I,+Al.kel 111 ,is 11 1.rAl:i• 1.I l'sr;etil, 11ii i,li IIC' Ih; ho s!, -r Ins elaini hereunder.
N( 1 I Ic I ( )I ( I \1\1 I Ili \ m,A In,unn! .!1,111 1'I.,iI')'. inl;neJl,,lr Ill !Itii,ltiWI bl the ( onlp,lns lshen it hekonlo,
i!IA1 Ci fee li, 11,11 heels „ 1,;11 hi ell, ill r;,! ❑11 1,11 I\ Ill eA.ied the Spes llic kutCnlllln Ismount vI hl,
l i': A.,'rad 11"w"i sll,tO n~1"I1 tl,: l 1ni1',1n, !ii)[)jlrrolt ,1heu ( erc,t Pt'rn,ln inzur, f 1i ihli Ly,en,e, for
l . _I1„', 111 rs
I1 I _ - 1 II ,J ;,1i ~ ~ \ I r 1 -ft. ll lei I :i; ni ii,,
'
1, is
r I' :ltl %,t ,r ..,t,i. 1
( air t i' ;iJ 111'1 114r,,l
+''i'„ A '1 i 111•:1 1 ~ Lf1, h I`I n I I r 1111111.! 110 11 r t6Ulll.; ,11}1
i
, ?I'I \1J.'.l rhJ' "t1i If r111 :'I~
IdICI , „n,, : 1111e,7 h. J,1i lh.I I 11(1te11 n,+li:v ,I
\\\11II'.~I kIIJ )kIIs\UAI I\INIk1lukSllIt II_sI if\IIII)\.It II\1I I1 k\sls Q1,IIROUih.
k':I (Ikis \".l) sl I I POkIIVI Iu)c I'\I1 \is i;I (;I I "II I If) IM, C(Alvil 1 1
\I I I i( 1 Td \I'I'1 111. Lela ,ecu l I I. Il itior„ 111 n,pLl!n! n.e' :,I ,111 ,i 11,11 1, ,u ii,•c,l })till
\ I ,'Ir;,l 1 r, \:3111 nI t l' I .u 1 %illl,h h rd.ls„n1I"! .11'pa rain!,. sIJ h,r 1',ts'.1'+Ie until Illl, P1,l!,%
sll. 1110'.Iylll :11 flit' 11111 sdrl.': ;Ilk ills, Ill ,It the ( 1,11 ill, UepJ F, 11k r1! ut II'C ( ollli'J 111.
S) likt 1( I AI 1(1V' I Ile Aen1eJ 111,Lre,l llr PLin Vdn)tni,rr,ll,+r shall pnr,ue all idulns than the N,tm,11 Inured Inds
h,'.e.' wI r.I Ili inl rams hei.IU,e 1.1 um. Al Ill resulting 111 a 1,1„ raanleill hl 1110 Name.l Ir,•ured the N,lnled
Iii-u l:,I,+I Plon Vl nl nl sirm or,h,lll ,I ei,la ill I,I Ihe(Ilinp,1111 Inr,1111 1rm+r11111 re;mere J. II the NJ red ItPrl red ar 1
I PLrn Is Iill ini filler I,n1, In 1'ur,uC an) is Iii Ili ayann,I ,I flit rd porf\ and Ihi Conlp.In) hit , mate escC„ henelir
p,,)nl; Ills II the \ IIncJ Inured unJer This I'nli0 the ( onlrin) "11,111 he suhn,g:nckl to ;711 rights kit the Nalned
Insured 1 be N,Inlcd Insured "!tail %:oorerolk! tulle ant do oli thine, ncic,"ate And required tit the C'ulnp,In% Ili
Puf,ue .f IN ,Ietion to tec,lser against the third part).
An) ama11111, rcaocred h) the Nsmcd Insured. Phin Administrator. or the C'orilpany in such ,0ion .hall he
1 ' u,edlir"Ilurein,hur,rthec\pen,C,Vlr:LrI%vr)IiIT dthCnlore IIli hllr,ctIT eClllnpJnit IoIT unypa sif leIf I%nIadelothc
N.Imed ill,llted \n) remaining amount shall he paid to the N;mxJ Insured
C II \N(A S' Nuu:e to iin% ;Igen1 or I,n,nAkdge posacssed h~ an) agent or by an% other person sh,lll not riles! I
luuscr or if change in :Ill) r,m of this Puhics or estop the Conlpan} 1'rom ass:rtinp am right under the terms of this
F'olii): nor shall the terms of this Polii) he a iced or ch,inged. except h) endorsement issued 10 form a
parr Ill this Police
ASSI(f NMIN is Assignnlenl ul'interest unJer this Polie) shall not hind the Company until its consent is endorsed
hereon: i1: holsc(er. the Named Insured shall die. such insurance as is i l'Inrded h) this Polic% shall apple I I Ito the
Named lnsured's legal reprewill,ilke, its the Named insured. but only sshile acting within the scope of his or her
duties iii, such, and i_'I ssith respeo 14) the rropeil) of the Named Insured, to the Person haling proper tempor,nr~
cusloJ) thereat ITS lnsurcd. but onl) until the oproininlenl and qualilicalion ill' the legal represcnlatisc.
i
i
i
i
r~
9
Ft 1
i.
9
1
CANCELLATION, This Pulicy may he canceled by the Named Insured by surrender thereof to the Company or
by mailing to the Company written notice stating when the realler such cancellation shall he effective. This Policy'
may he cancelled by the Company by mailing to the Named Inwred al the address shown in this Polio written
notice stating Nhen. not less than thirty (30) days thereafter such cancellation shall he effeciive.'the mailing of
notice shall he sufficient proofof notice. The timeofsurrender ortheeffeclivedate and hourof cancellation stated
in the notice shall become the cnd ol'the Policy Period. Deliver-, of such written notice either by the Named Insured
or by the Company shall he equivalent to mailing. l
[(the Named Insured cancels, earned premium shall he computed in accordance with the customan short rate 1
table and procedure If the Company cancels, earned premium shall he computed pro rata Premium adjustments
may be made either at the time cancelLaion is effected or as soon as practicable after cancellation becomes effec-
lice. but payment or tender of unearned premium is not a condition of cancellation
LEGAL ACTION No action at law or in equity shall he brought to recover on this Policy prior to the expiration of
sixh 1001 days after wri0en proof of loss has been furnished in accordance with the requirements of this Policy. No
such action shall he hroueht after thee %pirition of three years alter the time written proof of loss is required to
he furnished
CONFORNI WITH STATE STATUES, If any time limitation of this Policy with respect to giving notice of
- claim of furnishing proof of loss or bringing action is less than that permitted by the law of the state in which the
Named Insured resides, such limitation is hereby extended to agree with the minimum period permitted by
such law, .
REPRESEN"TAT IONS: By acceptance of this Police, the Named Insured agrees that the statements in the applica-
tion and in the Schedule are his agreements and representations that this Pulicy is issued and continued in reliance
upon the truth of such representations and that this policy embodies all agreements esisting between such Named
Insured and the Company,
SI MICE OF SUITS: It is agreed that in the dentofthe lailure ol'thc Company lopa% y am arnouniclaimed lobe
due hereunder, the Compam. at the request ofthe Named so will submit to the jurisdiction of any court of
competent jurisd ctian within the L!nited States and wi t v with all the requirements necessary to give such
coutijurisdiction and all matters arising hereunder s termined in accordance uith the taw and practice of
such cou n •
Further, pursuant to any statute of any sta e r ~Okwl
or district of the United Stales which makes Provision
therefor, the Company hereby designat'erintendant. Commissioner or Director of Insurance or other
s ` OIT:"spccifiedfor that purposeini his successors in ciice.as its true and lawfulattorneyupon whom
may be served any lawful process to 1n. Suit or proceeding instituted in a nN court ofcompeleni jurisdiction
by or on behalf of the Named Insured r any hendician hereunder arising out of this contract of insurance, and
hereby designates Counsel, Lexington Insurance Compam. Legal Department. 200 State Street. Boston.
Massachusetts 02109, or his or her representative as the Person to whom said officer is authorized to mail such pro-
cess or a true copy thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Policy to he signed by its President and Secretan. but this
Policy shall not he valid unless countersigned by a duly authorized representative of the Company.
i
{ Secretory C;y President
{
11
I
4 ~
f
2
R
i t
ENDORSEMENT
tms endorsement etteco,ve l c : r? 1 A , M forms a pan of
foJ'cy Ne issued to
fy Let 1ng tcn Ifisurance LUTpar-,
Specific .'pun-In"
It is hereby understood and agreed that in regard to Specific Excess
Jnsurance the total amount of ''Run-In" benefits to which Covered
Persons become entitled under this policy shall only include the
Eligible Expenses incurred on or after 8;1:88 and received by the
Administrator of the plan for payme no more than 30 days prior to
the Effective date of coverage. T Eligible Expenses must be paid
during the Policy year ofil%I,VE 11;1%69 as defined in Section
I DEFINITIONS of this policy.p
It is also uniersr.ooa at irled that the provisions of Section 1J
L:Nl-,f-T1fJW5 of Coverage & shall be applied as of 1"c:01 A.H.
I 1, ce '3t0 VP r•;-1 as Ef*ecti•e Da to of the F''O1jC j.
i
f
i
k
AWN,ired Pepreunivive
i
F a `
f ~
i
ENDORSEMENT
i
This endorsement, effective
M,
Policy No,
issued to forms e Dart of
I
by Lexin
gton insurance Company
o og aattiof the premium paid, the policy Is amended to include the
following additional coverage in Section V-Exclusions, item 13,
SPECIFIED ORGAN TRANSPLANT COVERAGE
~r
Subject to the provisions, conditions, exceptions, reductions
limitations of the
the Named Insured 1Policy, Lexington Insurance Company n excess ecific ten
agrees to reimburse I
Eligible Expenses resulting directly r A,nount for 100% of
heart, lung, heart-lung, liver from opacreash related to the a
procedures. Oman organ transplantation of
This rider provides coverage onl Plant
while this rider is in effect and only for Eli }61e
Paid Burin g Expenses Incurred!
Lexington Insurance Company also agr%ft reimburse s the Named 1
of a humanrage, and trarsportati sts directl insured for
rider, man organ u3emaina or 3 plant y related to the donation
subject to s Procedure covered under
i 00 for each or this
Wcompleted. 'V` gan transplant procedure
all benefits r v ~
maximum of s p ovided aed In this r
1,GOO,OU6, ,der are subject to a
lifetime
Benefit Period, as used herein
t ift , means five c51
Procedure i52i weeks immediately following a codays immediately prior to and
f covered under this rider. Plated organ transplant
If a Covered Person is an Employee Person ss a Dependent who is not Active]
endent who }s hosPital confined y At Work or if the
the Effective Date of p
this r
or totally disabled on
untler this rider ider, no insurance benefits shall f
until he or she is no be provided
longer disabled.
Totally Disabled, as used herein, means unable to perform the normal i
actlvities of like age and sex in good health.
While thls rider is in effect, the coverage provided herein shall app it
all current and new Covered units
apply to
I
-ku AY,
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTAtiVE
I
I i
t
w~
[E)aNt?DON 124SURM CE OOMPANY
200 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
ADDEXXX TO
EXCESS LOSS IIIDEKNrrY
APPLICATION
This Abden&u is attached to and forms a part of the Application of
(Name of Applicant)
Listed below are the names of:
1) all employees of the Applicant who, at any time during the period oomrencing three calendar
months immediately prior to the Proposed Effective Date, are not "actively at work"*, and
(2) the following who are "totally disabled,+*■* at any time during the period oxmencing Uu*ee
calendar months immediately prior to the Proposed Effective Date:
a) all dependents of all employees of the Applicant whether or not such employees are
"actively at work"* Curing the period specified in (1) above,
b) C.O.B.R.A.** participants, and
c) C.O.B.R.A.** eligible participants.
i
Also specified below for the-•i individuals ive ailment(s) are their diagnosis, current
status, prognosis, and changes to date under +licant's Irbenefit plane****.
The Applicant hereby certifies that th * ltaldsures made below are omplete and true to the
best of its knowledge and balief. cant understands that these statements are its
representations and are made fo of inducing Lexington insurance Ospany to issue
the coverage applied for in cation and that the Policy, if one is issued, will be
issued in reliance on the truth representations. it is understood and agreed that
Lexington will not be liable for any claims incurred by persons who were known to be not
$,actively at worVl' or who were known to be "totally disabled!'*** and are not disclosed in this
Application.
Discloswn su (Use reverse side for additional space, if needed, in listing of names, and
identify as 1, 2:ts)1 2(b)r 2(c), as appropriate).
Mlactively at work" in this Application means that the wployee is performing full time all
regular Quties of his or bar normal occupation.
**C.O.B.R.A. means the consolidated Cmaritui Budget Reconciliation act of 1985.
I
} Iftotally disabled!$ means that the individual is hospital confined or is unable to engage in
the nomal activities of a parson in good health of like age and sex.
***mrb ofit plarl, means the welfare benefits the Applicant has agreed to provide under a plan
of benefits for the Applicantes employees and their dependents and for any other covered under
such plan.
i
Signature Oonpany
gams Date
I
title
I
i
i
l
rl
1
i
f
i
i
4 ~
i'
II
.
i
2b42L
I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING BELL AVENUE ON APRIL 22-23, 1939; AND r
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Denton Festival Foundation has requested that Bell 1
Avenue, from its intersection with East Prairie Street to its inter-
section with East Hickory Street, a public street within the corporate
limits of the City of Denton, Texas be temporarily closed to public
vehicular traffic on April 22, 1989 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m. and on April 23, 1989 between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m., for the purpose of having the 1989 Spring Fling; and
WHEREAS, the Denton Festival Foundation has assured the City
- Council that all residents in such block have agreed to the temporary
closing of Bell Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I. That Bell Avenue, from its intersection with East
Prair a treet to its intersection with East Hickory Street, a Public
atreet in the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas, be
temporarily closed to vehicular traffic from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m. on April 22, 1988 and 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on April 23,
1989, for the purpose of having the Spring Fling with the following
conditions:
j 1. The Denton Festival Foundation will clean up after the
Spring Fling.
SECTION II. That the City Manager shall direct the appropriate
City partmeat to work with the Denton Festival Foundation to erect
barricades on Bell Avenue, from its intersection with East Prairie
Street to its intersectior, with East Hickory Street, at 8:00 a.m. on
April 22, 1,988 and to have the same removed at 8:00 p.m. and 10:00
a.m. on April 23, 1989 and to have the same removed at 7:00 p.m. on
said date.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of , 1989.
UTTMMS MAYOR
ATTEST:
i JENNIFER TE , C T SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
f
WrYol DENTONj TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (81?) 598.8307
OHdce of the City Manager
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 16, 1989
To: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
From: Roger Nelson, Administrative Assistant
Subject: BELL AVENUE STREET CLOSING
t
I
The Denton Festival Foundation has requested that th^ City
f Council temporarily close Bell Avenue between East Prs.irie and
East Hickory on Saturday, April 22, from 8 A.M. to 8 P.M., and
on Sunday, April 23, from 10 A.M. to 7 P.M. The event that is
scheduled for this time is the 1989 Spring Fling.
It is staff's understanding that no booths or activities are
planned for Bell Avenue proper, and that this request is being
made out of a concern for the safety of those people attending
Spring Fling. The children's activities are planned for the
park owned by the Denton Record Chronicle on the west side of
Bell Avenue, with additional events planned for the property
owned by the Greater Denton Arts Council on both the east and
west sides of Bell. It was the opinion of the organizers of
the event that if Bell were to remain open, the safety of those
people attending Spring Fling would be in jeopardy.
The emergency services aspect of the street closing have been
evaluated by both Chief Cook and Chief Jez. Both chiefs have
determined that the street closing poses no real threat to
their ability to deliver emergency services through out the
city.
f Staff is suggesting one change to the proposed street closing.
In order for the terouted traffic to move as smoothly as
possible, staff is suggesting that the eouthern boundary of the
closed area be changed to the intersection of Bell and
k Industrial rather than Bell and Prairie. North bound traffic
on Bell will simply continue on up industrial, making a right
turn on to Sycamore, followed by a left turn back on to Bell.
r
February 16, 1989
Page Two
South bound traffic will follow the same route. This change
will allow for a better flow of traffic through the area and it
will minimize any inconvenienc=e raised by the street closing.
This change has been discussed with Mr. Angelo, and he is in
agreement with staff's position on this matter.
Bell Avenue is one of the truck routes in Denton, Industrial is
not. The City will place temporary truck route signs along
Bell, Prairie, Elm, Locust, and McKinney. These signs will be
put in place and taken down by the same crews that will be
responsible for the barricades.
The Denton Festival Foundation will be making a contribution to
the City to reimburse the Police Department for any costs
incurred in providing traffic control. There will also be two
off duty Police officers as well as four Police reservists
providing on site security through out the Spring Fling
j activities.
Please let me know if any further information is needed on this
f matter.
t
Roq r Nelson
l
Attachments
4446M
r
r
February 16, 1989
I
Mr. Roger Nelso:l
Administrative Assistant
City of Denton
215 F. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Roger:
As you know, the Denton Festival Foundation has opted to relocate the Denton
` Spring Fling to the area in and around the center for the visual Arts. It will
f be necessary to utilize property on both sides of Bell Avenue controlled by the
Greater Denton Arts Council and the property owned by the Denton Record Chroni-
cle on the west side of Bell in order to accormodate the various events and
f activities planned for Spring Fling.
t
We are extremely concerned relative to the great amount of pedestrian traffic
which will be crossing Bell Avenue during the event and are, therefore, re-
questing that the City consider closing Bell Avenue frun Hickory to Industrial
during the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on Saturday, April 22, 1989, and
j from 10:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. on Sunday, April 231 1989.
As indicated in the attached petition, we have secured the support of all the
businesses which may be affected by this closure. Additionally, the attached
memorandums from the Chief of Police and the Fire Department support this
closure. I have also discussed this closure with the Transportation Engineer-
ing Division and with the Street Department and
with such action.
Since the City of Denton is one of the original founders of Spring Fling and a
very active co-sponsor of the event, we will insure that this closure is
adequately handled. That is, Streets will provide for proper barricading and
Streets, Solid Waste and Parks will provide any necessary cleanup.
should you have any questions or comments on this matter, please let us know.
Sincerely,
I
' R Aneo
SA/sc
2ba02148908
Attachments
~ If
I
Denton Police Department
221 N. ELM
DENTON, TEXAS 76201
I
To, Bill Angelo, Director of Public Works
From: Michael W. Jet, Chief of Police 1
Re: Street Closing
Date: January 30, 1989
~ I
Bill,
Per our telephone conversation, the Department has no objections to the
closing of Bell Street between Prairie and Hickory for the Spring Fling
Festival.
I
Although Bell is a major artery, I foresee no problems, provided it is
adequately barricaded and police officers are appropriately placed to J
assist in vehicular traffic. 1
1
e Z 1
Chie of olic
City of Denton
L) u 1.1 i
ar j rt J
f
WAN ceft
1
I
I
(817) 568-8181 METRO 434.2520
1
1
;M 10
TO: ROGER NELSON CMO JJ
FROM! JIM DOTSON POLICE DEPARTMENT 7
SUBJECT! CLOSING OF BELL AVE FOR SPRING FLING
DATE: FEBURARY ISF 1989
WE UNDERSTAND THERE IS A REGUEST TO CLOSE BELL AVE FROM HICKORY ST TO PRAIRIE.
THERE ARE A NUMBER OF THINGS SHAT WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU CONSIDER,
1. THE SECTION OF BELL AVE IN QUESTION 15 A TRUCK ROUTE THERE ARE SEVERAL TRUCK
RELATED BUSINESSES IN THE AREA THAT COULD BE EFFECTER.
E
I 2. THAT YOU CONSIDER BLOCKING BELL AT INDUSTRIAL. ON THE SOUTH END AND REROUTE
THE TRAFFIC DOWN INDUSTRIAL. THIS UOULii NOT IMPACT THE TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS
GOING TO LOCUST OR ELM. ,
E 11
3. THAT BARRICADES BE PLACED AT ALL INTERSECTIONS.
j 4. WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH ON DUTY POLICE OFFICERS TO STATION ONE AT RLL INTERSECTIONSr
THEREFORE WE WOULD NEED TO HAVE AT LEAST 4 OFF DUTY OFFICERS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL.
S. THERE SHOULD BE SOME THOUGHT TO THE LARGE CROWD AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR VEHICLE
~I
TRAFFIC IN THE AREA AND HAVE ADDITIONAL POLICE OFFICERS AND RESERVE POLICE
OFFICERS TO HANDLE THE CROWD CONTROL.
?JIM
j~
4 ~ D
FE8 1610
COY (F't?
City Mnr AGU- rcrirc
1
J
I
t
MEMO 089-007 J
TO: MR. B. ANGELO, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
FROM: J. L. COOK, JR., FIRE CHIEF
DATE: 24 JANUARY, 1989 { I
RE: SPRING FLING
I
THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH YOUR
REQUEST TO CLOSE BELL AVENUE BETWEEN HICKORY AND PRAIRIE ON
22 AND 23 APRIL, 1989 FOR THE ANNUAL SPRING FLING. WE
UNDERSTAND THAT THE STREET WILL ONLY BE CLOSED DURING THE
EVENTS AND NOT FOR THE ENTIRE 48 HOUR PERIOD.
SHOULD YOU NEEO ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, DO NOT HESITATE
TO CONTACT ME.
i
JLC/BF
1
~ I
j 1
1
i
E
I f
! A 2 519N I
hr ft cow
V
i
REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE
pen ee ✓A! ! v0 G I,
Organization requesting street closure -
Contact c^
Contact Persons 1
412 / 70
Address= s6E-83~T I
Phone Number /
Street To Be Closed= ^
Streets!
Intersecting
A/~
Yl
Reason For Closures ~4`---- --r<r
ae .
Ayr, 2S 60"*'*7~
ALL residents
please complete the bottom Portionthe tstroeft rclosure MUST be
{ and/or businesses affected by n lavor
contacted and sign below with an indication of being
or in opposition to the street closures
NAME AUTHORIZED FAVOR 'OPPOSE
OF BUSINESS SIGNATURE a~
1• n
2 r~ U I f A .I_ t ey !
• J8iLI1i
rt~~
!9f*vLd
J~
4• '
i s•?n~senLt-+J1~ /7•
0
1/j or
Ta-
11• kv ty ciK 'eta' I
i 12•
I ~
2983C/5
r
RK29K FOR STREET CLOSURE
Organization requesting street closure
Contact Person: /~,4 ~,P/
Address ! 4-iv
Phone Number: Street To Be Closed: ~~~~/~L', ~~i
Date and Time To Be Closed:
/
A..N, r3 /•~i~1
40V,01" 4W, WO,/
Intersecting Streets:
~,j~,
kk Reason For Closure:_jl
j 1
Please complete the bottom
portion of this form. AL~4 residents
! and/or businesses affected by the street closure
I r contacted and sign below with an indication of being In favor
of in opposition to the street closure.
3
M i NAME AUTHORIZED
Ss SIGNATURE V OR/OPPOSE
1 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
F
7.
I _ -
I
10.
2983C/5
~ 1ii
I
w 197
IULL z
CON RE
J;- 2
V p
23,6 s
EJO!
24 11 uLu+o
33
iAK p+ t -KII
T 8+ 2 T~
47 ~ r ()AK V
auc
ICK
OR w
38
4 - -
101
~CJfi:p
2219282 a
DOW TOWN
ST a
A
r 6 8 c°
~ E. PRAIR
v a' H
O N OH. e Y
4 2 _ spa
J
03
M-ILL
1
All
1
i
i
i
I
i
I ~
III i
JL-L
IIIIIIIIIIIINT
q
1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION TFMPORARILY CLOSING FRY STREET BETWEEN THE INTER-
SECTION OF OAK STREET AND HICKORY STREET ON SUNDAY, APRIL 16, 1989,
AND PROVYDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on Sunday, April 16, 1989, the Delta Lodge is
sponsoring the Fry Street Fair to be held en Fry Street between the
intersection of Oak and Hickory; and
WHEREAS, all abutting owners of the street have given their
permission to the temporary closing of said street; and
E WHEREAS, the Fry Street Fair is open to the general public of
f the City and County of Denton; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for the said Fry
Street Fair and in order to protect the safety of citizens who
attend, the City Council of the City of Denton deems it is
necessary to temporarily close a portion of Fry Street between Oak
Street and Hickory Street from the hours of 6:00 a.m. until 8:00
II` f
p.m. on Sunday, April 16, 1989: NOW, THEREFORE, +
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITI OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION_I. That Fry Street between Oak Street and Hickory
` Street shall be temporarily closed as a street or public thorough-
fare of any kind or character whatever on Sunday, April 16, 1989
from 6:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. for the purpose of holding the Delta
Lodge Fry Street Fair provided, however, that the following
conditions are met by the Delta Lodge:
1. The Lodge will provide someone to help keep the Grace
Temple Baptist Church parking lot clear of non-church
members;
2. That the Lodge will clean up after the Fry Street Fair;
and
3. That no music will be played until 12:15 p.m.
~I SECTION II, That the City Manager shall direct the appro-
priate City Department to erect barricados at Fry Street, from the
E intersection of oak Street and the intersection of Hickory Street,
at 6:00 a.m. on April 16, 1989, and to have the same removed at
I
` 8:00 p.m. on said date.
SECTION Ill. That in tho event of rain, said street may be
closed on Sunday, April 23, 1989.
1
1. f
i
geCT10N IV. That this resolution shall take effect and be in
full force and effect from and after the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of March, 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
i
ATTEST:
I
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
I
i
J
I
I ~
y
4
TO I ROGER NELSON CMO
FROMf CAPTAIN DOTSON
SUP.IECTt FRY STREET FAIR
DA1E1 MARCH 2r 1989
WE HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE STREET CLOSING ON FRY STREET AS LONG AS THE
TRUCKS THAT WILL DE AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF FRY AND HICKORY AND OAK HAVE
A DRIVER THAI STAYS UITH THE TRUCK, THIS IS NECESSARY IN CASE WE NEED TO
GET AN EMERGENCY VEHICLE IN THE CLOSED AREA.
r
TH K
t
A
&mT N
i
i
1
I
rl
?1 p
MEMORANDUM
TO: Roger Nelson, City Manager's Office
FROM: Robert Hagemann, Fire Marshal
i
DATE: March 2, 1989
SUBJECT: DELTA LODO: FRS' STREET FAIR
(April 16, 1989 or rain date April 23p 1989)
The attached diagram of the Fry Street Fair will meet our
requirements as to fire lane and response to any emergency situa-
tion
Robert Hagemann
I I
RH/bf
I
i ~
I
I
a,
DIAGRAM OF FRY STREE,r FAIR
BOA K
r~lr,~ c
E MUCK
1
L i 4 ~ 1
FIB f
L4~ i fff
f
ff
f
V I
{ } I ~7OYfINS fI ~ ff
1 f f
f k~ !
f !
1 f~UE
~Y
wyr. 1 \ 1"Ll
HIUDRY
i
3
I
{
i
Growing
In
Grace
Grace Temple Baptist Church
Ran Fe kmende. DMIn.
rastor
Roger W.Hollar March 3, 1909
Associate castor
Randall 9ardln
Minister of Musk
To Whom It May Concern:
[d tertu:o
Minister to Singles
WckwIlur The Grace Temple Baptist Church of Denton, Texas, will not oppose 1
Minister torosnh the granting of permission for the holding of the Fry Street Fair.
While we do not oppose, this is not to be construed as an ~ndorse-
rDirect' ment of the fair or the activities that are held. The fraternities or, Dayccare are Ministry ortect Preschool- have proved to be good neighbors
over the past three years, and have
been considerate in their timing and in cleaning up after the fair.
In light of this, we do not oppose.
F Sincerely, '
on ld t. Fellemende
Pastor
RF /bb
J
I
o ~ I
a
1106 West Oalc Denton, Terns 76101 (811) 387-6137
li
F tA
ar
i
L
3
CITYotDENTON;TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE {8171566.8200
MEMORANDUM
i
DATE! March 2, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
3
FROM: Roger Nelson, Administrative Assistant {
I SUBJECT: DELTA LODGE'S REQUEST TO CLOSE PRY STREET
Delta Lodge has requested the closing of Pry Street, between oak and Hickory,
from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Sunday, April 16, 1989. This street closing
has been requested so the the Pry Street Pair can be conducted.
I
Mr. Berry Morguloff is the contact person for this evert. Mr. Morguloff has 1
assured me that Delta Lodge has made all of the necessary arrangements with
the Police$ Fire and Solid Haste Departments. They have also made
arrangum-ants for portable toilet facilities.
As you will note on the diagram in the back-up, fire lanes have been providad
in case of an emergency. There will be drivers stationed at each truck so
that it the event of an emergency, the trucks can be moved at a moment's
notice.
Four off duty Denton Police officers will be present throughout the event.
Two aidltional off duty officers will be present during the Pair's busiest
time.
Mr. Morguloff has assured me that the members of Delta Lodge are aware of
their responsibility to clean up the area at the conclusion of the event. To
1 this end, they have arranged to have six extra dumpstera placed at strategic
locations.
Della Lodge has secured a place to set up seven portable toilets ihat will be
serviced throughout the event. in addition, they will also open up the
Lodge's restrooms to people attending the Fair. This brings the total number
of restrooms available to 11. In addition to these, the businesses along Fry
Street will remain open during the Fair, Some of these have public restrooms
which will he available to their customers.
i
f ~
(Fb l
Mayor and Members of the City Council
march 2, 1989
Page 2
Finally, Council asked that each new street closing request be evaluated
according to the proposed street closing regulations that have been discussed
recent weeks. Fry Street, between Oak and NiitiS4500 Th a sets of
in r5Eecpeer linear foot, that woulu make the cleanup depos
would make the barricade deposit 875. r-
baulofefs, ind at ic $2ated5 to per me settha, t they expect 3,000 people to attend Fry street
Morrrgicad han 2,000 of
Fair. If 14 toilets no mor be trequired these people will be present at any
one time,
-Rog e Nelson
I
wp
I I 09920
II
T
I
E
h
E
I
11
t ~I
I
I
j
REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE
Organization requesting street closureApe> j
Contact Persons Ni(,IRTU 1n V-
Addresst 30~y
Phone Numbers '')lh_~
Street to Be Closed: <,T. EQnM Lnn Awn Tn 'Q'QQ PN}
i
j Intersecting Streetss OA K + ~~;~1CAQ
Reason For Closures F ~ T, (o R• ,
gJ S ra ; A Pry I 1
QI~; n D~ ~e. 0 11,E IV
I
f Please complete the bottom portion of this form. ALL residents i
and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be i
{ contacted and sign below with an indication of being Fn favor i
or in opposition to the street closure.
NAME AUTHORIZED
OF BUSINESS SIGNATURE FAVOR/OPPOSE
n1 4} 3. /Y
5 to 7--L V-5
6 S C AV4
• sC
a~
a l
PAV,) r,
12.
2583C/5
a
s
f'
a
i
REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE
Organization requesting street closure
Contact Person:~/yRRi1
Addresss~ ST _ y
Phone Numbers
Street To Be Closed: PM
Intersecting Streets:
Reason For Closures/ f~TLI
Please complete the bottom portion of this form. ALL residents
and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be
contacted and sign below with an indication of being In favor `
or in opposition to the street closure.
NAME AUTHORIZED
OF BUSINESS SIGNATURE FAVOR/OPPOSE
e
e-
2.Ca✓2J< ,saAtrw c
s.
6.
e.
f 9~
j 1D•
ll.
12.
2983C/S
I
'R
f
4
i
d
~I
I
1
I n
I ~ ~vL1 i~1~ - 1
f A.
I I
I I
I
i
I I
j
j
LI)
1
rT=l
\I
D=JmLj
1
J
rl=
ICI
f
i
J
I
-771
l
f
1
I
TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.6307
CITY of DENTON,
Office of the City Manager
i
E
M E M O R A N D U M
I
T0: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: March 1, 1989 {
SUBJECT: The Police Training Academy
Attached is a resolution that endorses the Police Training
' Academy. We need this resolution in order to continue :o nave
our training courses acireolited by Texas Commission ~n Law
Enforcement Officer Standards and Education.
Recently, they changed their regulations on training and
require a resolution as well as well as several other items in
order for the training to meet the TCLEOSE standards. There is
no cost to the department or the City. In the past, our
training has been certified by TCLEOSE, and we would like to
continue getting certification from TCLEOSE for the training
that we do within the department.
If you have any further questions, I would be happy to try and
it
answer tham at the meeting.
k
f' Hick veh a _
{ Deputy City Manager
RRS:bw
4462M
i Attachments
i
J
~i
I
{
r
n
2639L
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
SUPPORTING THE DENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINING ACADEMY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Denton desires to support i
the Denton Police Department in submitting to the Texas
Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education a
request to license a permanent training facility; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the Council of the City of Denton hereby
support's tE-eDenton Police Department Training Academy.
SECTION II. That the Council hereby authorizes and directs
the ty anager, or his designee, to represent and act on behalf ,
of the City of Denton in working with the Texas Commission on Law
I Enforcement Officer Standards and Education in obtaining a
license for the Denton Police Department Training Academy.
SECTION III. That a copy of this Resolution be forwarded to
the exas omm scion on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and
Education.
j SECTION IV. That this resolution shall become effective J
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989•
MAYOR
RT-S~T£PHE
ATTEST:
j JENNIFER WALTER 3, CITY SECRETARY
I
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
II
nn~/F j
BY:
rif tht e elved proof nmJ before that date that mmust ust ego accept t to dthe ale of
commission ion dumd~rot name, social security
the applicant has mot the required by the agency agency, and approximate
standards (d) if a proper report of appoint. without Including any other operation,
(2) The acceptance date Is to ment is received for some appoint. of that operation.
day proof of ail required standards ment other than as a peace officer, (c) Such request should not be for
is receved and accepted by the the commission may accept such a more than 12 months and may be
commission and will be used report (A) A the commission has al. (e) The effective date of this sec. renewed.
ready received the completed ap- lion is February 1, 1989 cover Whig s record is in an underl
pliCatpR; or cover status, the commission will
(8) f no application Is required Sec. 211.25. Meeting Dales and rueslon In the negative to any re
(b) The commission may set a Proced,res. quest on thtkeneorolder.
lc pent
ensirlg, certification, or acknow• status h tat license Adder.
lodgment date or may Issue any (a) The commission will corn (e) The ruaryv , date d this sac.
document before the date of ap• with the open meetings law and lion is February 1, 1989.
pointment. but will never do so may hold quarterly meetings Sec, 211.65. Academy tJcens- J
belorethedate ofreceipt oraccep• throughout each calendar year, Ing,
tance, whichever Is later normally scheduled In Austin at 16
(c) A person is licensed, certified, a m on the second Wednesday of (a) The commission may issue an llck
the ' lion on he dated such acommhe each March, June, September, and academy license to an academy
commission whether or riot; (1) the date, time, and location is organ operated by di vision n state of the
(1) any physical document has altered by vote of the commis. state forr the political
specific ur of the
been or ever Is Issued, or sloners; or purpose of
(2) the person has such physi- (2) more frequent meetings are training offcers or jailers. iss Dal document in his possession, called by the chairman on the
license. anb cademy muse pass an
(d) Any such document may ex• chairman's own motion or upon the Inspectlor, of its facilities and In-
plre or be cancelled, surrendered, written request of (No voting corn- structional materials and must sub.
suspended, revoked, deactivated, missioners
or otherwise Invalidated. Mere pos. every two y pit for commission approval:
session of the physical document a ie) At
regular or once are, (1) a completed, carmen applica-
does sot necessarily mean that the receive pudic commenton IralnIng lsig ion on a commission form that r ned
admini
strator person: and standards for officers and headd of ft orga l atlon exercising
(1) currently holds, has ever held, jailers.
alive control over the
or hasanyofthepowers olthe of• (c) Each meeting will be con. academy;
fice indicated on the document, or ducted by the chairman or, in the (2) a resolution of support from
license. valid absence of the vice-chairman. the chairman.
governing bodyof the sponsor.
secretary. the Ing Of anlration;
lodgment. most senior commlasioner, or 44 t The
effectiv Ib(n is February fe d~gd this sec- another commissioner selected by academy which formalmust notf the
vote. In that order, represent the status of the academy
Sec- 2i 1,21. Dale of A (d) The effective date of this sec- or be confusing to law eMorcemenl
pent. ppoint- tion is February 1, 1989. or to the public;
Sec. 211,28, Undercover opera
4) a tionallbudgestandaproposed
(a) To determine experience for Records, that purposes of law enforcement Ing was be schedule
g will behedufe t ed on a conraln-
prdciency certifcation, the corn- conducted on a contisu•
mission must use the date of ap- records are co erned by and Its ing balls;
evidence that an advi
polntment that appears in the Records Act However, to protect board has
already been appointed
records of any appointing agency, the security of an undercover as provided by law and rule Includ-
whether licensed or not operation and Its law enforcement Ing a list d board members and a
i (b)Aperson Is IIcensed oNy MthaI partcipants• the commission may, brief rcchation d their current titles
person still holds a license [hat has upon request to the commission's and quallfcatloru;
not expired or been cancalled, sur• custodian of records, temporarily 6) any rendered, suspended, revoked, remove from its roullnely accessed necessary
tovshow N decisions
deactivated, or otherwise In. files the records of an Individual which have been made by that
validated, license holder.
(ard In all
c) if a proper report of Pppolrt• (b) Such request maybe Informal- ccoommission;afeas required by the
ment s recafvadfor appointment as ly accepted, but should be In writ- (7) the name and social security
a peace officer, the commission Ing from the chief administrator In- number of the proposed training
3
V
r
e
IV. School Hours
A. During what hours will training be conducted? Typically 0800-1700
B. Will coordinator or his designee be available at all times when
training is being conducted? (X) Yes No
V. Bees
A. Will tuition or fees be charged for training conducted?
( X) Yes ( ) No
B. If tuition or fees will be charged, what is the purpose? f
To cover expenses (Outside instructor cost or materials) 1
VI. Equipment
All Will academy have and maintain sufficient equipment to be used !n
the instruction of its students? (X-) Yes O No
1
VII. Attachments
A. Please-attach the followings
j 1. Names, employment and qualifications of Advisory Board. Mem-
bers
2. List of training courses to be offered during the first
quarter of licensing (attach training calendar)
3. Grading standard and methods to evaluate effectiveness of
training, equipment and facilities
4. Admission standards for students
5. A resolution of support from the governing body of the
sponsoring organization.
f b. Proposed start up and operational.budget
7. Minutes of any advisory board meetings which have been
{ 4 conducted prior to this application being submitted.
t
cY
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
rTl=
J-1 I
- R
Y
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GUIDELINES FOR FUNDING AND SELECTING
DEVELOPMENT PLAN CANDIDATE WATER AND SEWER LINES; PROVIDING FOR
THE PROCESS TO BE FOLLOWED IN APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN CANDIDATE
WATER AND SEWER LINES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Denton Development Plan adopted by the City of
Denton contains policies providing for the expenditure of public
funds to encourage balanced growth and economic development, and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of those policies, the 1988-1993
Capital Improvement Plan approved by the city Council proposes to
allocate $500,000.00 each year to fund Development Plan Candidate
Water and Sewer Lines to carry out the balanced growth and economic
policies of the Denton Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Capital Improvement Plan, for fiscal
year 1988-1989 the City Council appropriated $500,000 for
Development Plan Candidate Water and Sewer Lines; and
WHEREAS, the Public Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning
commission have considered and recommended adoption of the
` Guidelines for Funding and Selecting Development Plan Candidate
Water and Sewer Lines; NOW, THEREFORE:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I. That the Guidelines for Funding & Selecting
Development Plan Candidate Water and Sewer Lines, attached hereto
as Document I, is approved.
SECTION Ii. That the process for reviewing and approving how
the funds budgeted for Development Plan candidate Water and Sewer
Lines shall be spent shall be in accordance with the flow chart
shown in Exhibit IV, attached hereto.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
I' ATTEST;
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY;
i
DOCUMENT I
Guidelines for Funding 6 Selecting Development
Plan Candidate Water and Sewer Lines
Upon annual review and during preparation of the Utility
Department Five Year Capital improvements Plan, and subsequent
finalization of the Utility Department Operating Budget, and
with the approval of the Public Utilities Board, $500,040 of
Utility Department Capital Improvements funds for the current
year may be dedicated for Denton Development Plan Water and
Sewer Lines, provided such expenditure does not create an undue
hardship on the rate payers of the Utilities and is seen to be
in the best interest of the community.
The $500,000 to be placed in the Utility Department Capital
Improvements Plan for the purpose of the Development Plan Water
and Sewer Lines shall be designated to two (2) primary
purposes. The goal of these funds dedicated to the Denton
nevelopment Plan is to lead growth to certain geographical areas
l ? the City and to encourage economic development via extension
of water and sewer lines for industrial developments.
The $500,000 designated in the Utility Department Capital
Improvements Plan as "Development Plan Water and Sewer Lines"
` (Exhibit III) shall be distributed as follows:
1, $1000000 shall be set aside to service residential and
commercial type development(s), the specific sites sha11 be
determined and prioritized by the ranking methodology
outlined in Exhibit I, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof. Exhibit I shall be reviewed and
approved by the Public Utilities Board on an annual basis
in order to assure that all factors relating to the ranking
of a project reflect current economic and financial
conditions. Other such approvals as may be necessary shall
also be obtained prior to final approval of proposed
development(s).
2. $400,000 shall be set aside for industrial development
purposes. Such funds shall be dedicated when an actual
prospect is available and after such development has been
t analyzed using criteria for evaluating industrial
j development infrastructure assistance programs as outlined
in Exhibit 11 attached herewith. If an industrial prospect
does not materialize within the first six (6) months of the
fiscal year, the funds may be redirected to either
industrial site candidate lines or residential/commercial
developpment plan lines after review and recommendation by
the PuD1ic Utilities Board and approval by the City Council.
i
k
t ~
t
The Executive Director of Finance of the City will
that funds are encumbered assure
for "dedicated" profects and
transferred forward into the next fiscal year.
Unspent and unencumbered Development Plan Water and Sewer
Line funds may not be carried forward to a future year.
i
i i
s
i
i
v ~
I
i
i
I
6325U;3.4
J
jA
i
EXHIBIT I
Criteria for Ranking Balanced Growth Utility Lines
Residential/Commercial Candidates
Introduction
This ranking system has been designed to prioritize the list of +
residential and commercial development plan candidates for the i
Utility Capital Improvement Plan's designated "Development Plan
Water and Sewer Lines It is recognized that the development
potentials considered by this ranking system may change from year to i
/---N year as physical developments progress in specific areas. It shall
be necessary, therefore, to review the ranking of projects on an
annual basis to take into consideration changing circumstances.
1. Development Potential in the Short Term
Access by improved thoroughfare 1-6*
No announcements
Zoning but no plats
i
Access by improved thoroughfare 7-13**
Announcements
Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare 14.20•**
Announcements
Zoning I
Plats
*Developer has not made an announcement for developing his
property and has not platted for development. Thoroughfare and
zoning, however, do exist.
j **Developer has announced to the City Staff his intention to J
develop and to follow up with platting, Thoroughfare and zoning,
however, do exist.
***Developer has announced and platted his development to the
City Staff; thoroughfare and zoning do exist.
2. Fconomic Benefits to the City
Residential Multi-family 1.5
Residential Singly Family 6-10
Commercial/Retail 11-15
Mixed Uses/Offices 16.20
I !I
I
r
7
t
rt
s
EXHIBIT 1 (cont'd)
3. Balanced Growth
South and Southeast 0-4
Northeast 5-9
East 10-14
Northwest 15-1B
West 19-20
4, Compact Growth
Development less than:
200 feet away from existing utility lines 20
201.400 feet away from existing utility lines 15
401-600 feet away from existing utility lines 10
601-1000 feet away from existing utility lines 04
1000.2000 feet away from existing utility tines 1
over 2000 feet away from existing utility lines 0
S. Health. Safety 6 Environmental Considerations {
Related Circumstances: (scores range from 1-20 depending upon
circumstances)
i ~
6, Engineering Concerns
Regulatory requirements 0-10
Provides off-site service to existing development 0-5
Provides off-site service to undeveloped areas 0-5
Improves system performance 0.5
7. Demand divided b Cost Ratio (Use demand points derived by
ce cu at ons 1
a. Water Demand: j
(1) Residential Uses
Demand - 165 GPCO x HHS X 0 Units x 365 d/y
where GPCD a gallons per capita per day
or also called gallons per pperson per day
HHS v Household size (SF•2,7 MF-1.7)
d/y w days per year
(2) Hon-Residential Uses
it Demand • GPCD x i persons x 365 d/y based on the type of
establishment. The following list has been adopted from
the Texas Department of Health:
! 1
I
L
1
rl
I
.
4 .
EXHIBIT I (cont'd)
Type of Establishment Gallons per Capita Der Day (GPCD)
Restaurants i8
Schools w/o cafeterias, gym or showers.... 18
Schools w/cafeterias, no gym or showers... 24
Schools w/cafeterias, gym and showers..,.. 30
Office Buildings.,,.,,,,
8
Hospitals.... 218
40
Institutions (other than hospitals).,,,,,, 1
120
Factories (g/p/shift, exclusive of 24
Industrial wastes)
Parks w/o bathhouses,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 6
Swimming pools 3 bathhouses 12
Country Clubs (per resident member),,.,,,, 120
Drive-In theatres (per car space)..,...,,, 6
M
Airports (per ovie Theatres (per auditorium seat)...,,, 6
Laundries-Self pService r(gals/wash/customer) 60
Stores (total per day per washroom)....... 480
Service stations (per vehicle served)..,,, 12
I b, Wastewater Flows:
E
(1) Residential Uses
Flow ■ 132 GPCD x HHS x I of Units x 365 d/y
where GPCO gallons per capita per day
or also called gallons per person per day 1
HHS • Household size (SF■2.7 MF-1.1)
i d/y ■ days per year
(2) Non-Residential Uses
Flows • GPCD x 0 persons x 365 d/y based on the type of
establishment. The following list has been adopted from
the Texas Department of Health:
type of Establishment Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD)
Restaurants (per meal) 5
Schools w/cafeterias, no showers,,,,,,,,,, i5 1
Schools w/cafeterias and showers,.,,,,,,,, 20
Recreational Parks, overnight user.30
Recreational Parks, day 5
Office Buildings/Factories,,,,,20
Motels..... 50
Nursing)Home r(par) bed) 1200
00
8. Cosi
These costs are for costs of water and/or sanitary sewer lines
j only to tie in to closest applicable city service lines and
running across one side of subject development.
I
I
A
I
i
I
EXHIBIT I (cont`d)
9. Subtotal Points (Add Columns 1-7)
10. Priorities Before Pro Rita Survey
Based on points only, give first priority to highest points,
second priority to next highest points, etc.
11. Priorities After Pro Rata Survey
When list of development plan candidates water and sanitary
sewer lines are prioritized before pro rata survey, take those
projects totaling numbers of dollars available and survey
prc~ert~~own~~ers for willingness to pay pro rata upon comp a on
o~consiruciTonI Give one (1) point for each owner willing to
sign a pro rata payment contract. Re-total points and re-assign
priorities.
t TOTAL POINTS
Re-assign priorities by new summation of points.
` i
I
II
i
i
63250:5.8
R ~
E ti
EXHIBIT II
Industrial Development Infrastructure
Assistance Study 1
Financial analysis of industrial prospects for infrastructure I
investment.
a. Formula +
NET CASH FLOW BENEFITS - INFRASTRUCTURE AND/OR
CAPACITY RELATED COSTS
Where the computation of BENEFITS is determined as follows: i
Total Payroll
o Less commuters income
o Less all non-local taxes
o Plus tax revenue from plant
o Plus net revenue for Electric, Water and Sanitary Sewer
i I
j o Times multiplier
j Equals ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL BENEFITS '
i
{ b. Variable
o Number of employees
o Value of plant
j o Local property tax rate +
o Income multiplier i
o Individual taxes
c. Assumption
Additional costs to serve demands of citi:ens for public
services are less then or equal to tax revenue received
S from these individuals.
i
i
6325U:4
1
J
rA
i
` EXHIBIT III
Criteria for Ranking Econooic Development
Utility Lines
Introduction
This ranking system has been designed to
Industrial Development Plan candidates for
prioritize the list of
Improvement Plan's designated "Development Plane WateritandCdSewer
Lines". It fs recognized that the development potentials considered
by this ranking system may change from
developments progress in specific areas. yeIt shalla beasneceisarye
therefore, to review the ranking of protects on an annual basis to
take into consideration Changing circumstances.
1. Development Potential in the Short Term
' Access by improved thoroughfare Points
No announcements 1-6*
Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare
Announcements )•13**
I Zoning but no plats
Access by Improved thoroughfare
Announcements 11.20***
Zoning
Plats
*Developer has not made an
property and has not platted forndeveiopment. for Thoroughfare and
zoning, however, do exist,
**Developer has announced to the City Staff his intention to
develop and to follow up with platting. Thoroughfare and zoning,
however, do exist.
***Developer has announced and platted his development to the
City Staff; thoroughfare and zoning do exist.
2. Size Industrial Area to be Developed Points
` More than 300 Acres
If 200 - 300 Acres 15
f 100 - 200 Acres
Less than 100 Acres 16S
i
I
I
t
Ih
fi
1
i
I y
I
I
I
it
3. Balanced Growth Points
South and Southeast 0-4
Northeast 5-9
East 10-14
Northwest 15-18
west 19-20
4. Industrfal Site Owner Commitment
a. Time Frame for Development
i
Less than 1 year 10
2 to 5 years 5
More than 5 years 0
b, Activity
Ownership of property 10
Marketing of property 2.6
C4 Investment of Infrastructure 6.10
5. Compact Growth
Development less than:
I
200 feet away from existing utility lines 20
201.400 feet away from existing utility !Ines 15
401.600 feet away from existing utility tines 10
601-1000 feet away from existing utility lines 04
1000-2000 feet away from existing utility tines 1
over 2000 feet away from existing utility lines 0
6. Health, Safety A Equipment Consideration
Related Considerations: (Scores range from 1.20 depending upon
circumstances such as pollutant versus clean non-pollutant
industry, light versus heavy industry, healthy versus unhealthy
work environment, etc.)
7. Engin-iering Concerns
Regulatory requirements 0.10
Provides off-site service to existing development 0.5
Provides off-site service to undeveloped areas 0-5
Improves system performance 0-5
i
• 1
I
i
f
8. Demand 01vided b Cost Ratio (Use demand points derived by
i~ ca cu at ons >y
a. Water Demand:
Demand • GPCD x M employees x 365 d/y based on the type of
industry. Generally this will be 25 GPCO for a
non-pollutant industry. The GPCD should, however, be
verified from each industry.
b. Wastewater Flows:
Flows • GPCD x i employees x 365 d/y based on the type of
I industry. Generally this will be 22 GPCD for a
non-pollutant industry. The GPCO should, however, be
verified from each industry.
9. Cost
II These costs are for costs of water and/or sanitary sewer lines
only to tie in to closest applicable city service 11nes and
running across one side of subject development.
10. Subtotal Points (Add Columns 1-1)
11. Priorities before Pro Rata Survey
Based on points only, give first priority to highest points,
second priority to next highest points, etc.
12. Priorities after Pro Rata Survey
when list of development plan industrial candidates water and
sanitary sewer lines are prioritized before pro rata survey,
take those projects totaling numbers of dollars available and
survey property owners for willingness to pay pro rata upon
completion of construction. Give one (1) point for each owner
wilting to sign a pro rata payment contract. Re-total points
and re-assign priorities.
TOTAL POINTS
Re-assign priorities by new summation of points.
I I
632SW O-12
I
t
~'I J
f
i
EXHIBIT fY
Flow Chart
Approval Development Plaatand $everfor
lines
i
ICIP Projects Including Development I
(Plan Lines for
I I. Residentfal/Commercial Sites I
I 2. Industrial Sites
3. Industrial Development Infra-1
structure Assistance Pro ram I
1
IaTAFlndustevi wSiteidendial/Commeerc f M I
Candidates and
lprioritize according to ranking I
lcriteria. I
II f
I
IPBZ fn context of CIP document,
to_I
VTrW I
13r13 +
and ecommend L nes to 1
ICiLy Council in context of CIP
Idocument. I
I I
1110 1 11111
IP1aR lin
es for res/com sites and industrial
e en I
(sit alto rna
l tives Plus the guidelines for
t I
In dustrfaI development infrastructure assfs-
IInce ro rem alternatives.
I
1 un s ma ell levellable for Industrial Oev. I 1~Ti5BER T-R
!Infrastructure Assist, Progren 1 ltakes action to construct j
(funds to be held for 6 months onl lresidentfal/co,nmerci 1
lactuel candidates. I (development play line es +
_ 1 I 1
un s ave no een use 1
lby Industrial Dev. Infrastructure Prgram I
j lmayibe•redirectedltorIndustrial dsite
Icandidate lines or res/com developmentl
IIandnP82nforarecommendationuont to PUB 1
11110cttion. PUB and Pal then makes
Iracommendatfon to C1t Council, f
6325U:13
I
I
J '
r.
March 7, 1989
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
RE: CONSIDER RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR SELECTING THE
"DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER AND SEWER LINES" TO BE FUNDED BY
THE CITY OF DENTON THROUGH ITS UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN IN SUPPORT OF THE BALANCED GROWTH AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT GROWTH POLICIES OF THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN;
APPROVING THE METHOD11OGY TO BE USED IN THE PUBLIC
INVESTMENT STUDY REQUIRED BY THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
DETERMINE WHAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS QUALIFY FOR CITY
INCENTIVES; PROVIDING FOR THE PROCESS TO BE FOLLOWED IN
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER AND SEWER LINES; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
f ~
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval of subject guidelines and attached Resolution.
I
SUMMARY:
The Public Utilities Board, in response to the Denton
Development Plan as adopted by the City Council, proposed in
their 1989-93 Capital Improvement Plan to budget 5500,000/year
in each year of the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan to meet
the "Balanced Growth" and "Economic Development" goals of the
City of Denton, The attached guidelines document specifies how
and hhen these candidate lines and Industrial Development
Infrastructure Assistance (IDIA} funds are to be evaluated,
ranked, and funds committed.
The Public Utilities Board recommended approval of these
guidelines on November 16, 1988. The Planning and Zoning
Commission, at a Joint meeting with the Public Utilities Board,
recommended approval of these guidelines on February 8, 1989.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
City of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, Developers, and
Citizens.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$500,000 per year for water and sewer lines.
i
_ T
1
rl
B
5
t
r
Y(
CC Meeting
Page 2
Respectfully submitted,
o~ yam- arre Y
Manager
1
4a are Y
am, rector ova er
tewater Utilities
l
II 1 Appr~d
i
t xecu ve recto
eprtme ensonof , Utilities
Document 1 Guidelines for Funding and Selecting
Exhibit I Criteria for Ranking Balanced Growth Utility Lines
(Residential/Commercial Candidates)
11 Industrial Development Infrastructure Assistance Study '
III Criteria for Ranking Economic Development Utility Lines
IV flow Chart Approval Process for Development Plan Mater
and Sewer Lines
Document II Resolution
Minutes PUB Meeting of November 16, 1988 +
I
b325U:1.2
I
p
DOCUMENT I
Guidelines for Funding A Selecting Development
Plan Candidate Water and Sewer Lines
Upon annual review and during preparation of the Utility
Department Five Year Capital Improvements Plan, and subsequent
finalization of the Utility Department Operating Budget, and
with the apnroval of the Public Utilities Board, $500,000 of
Utility Department Capital Improvements funds for the current
year may be dedicated for Denton Development Plan Water and
--1 Sewer Lines, provided such expenditure does not create an undue
hardship on the rate payers of the Utilities and is seen to be
in the best interest of the community.
The $500,000 to be placed in the Utility Department Capital
E Improvements Plan for the purpose of the Development Plan Water
and Sewer Lines shall be designated to two (2) primary
i purposes. The goal of these funds dedicated to the Denton
'levelopment Plan is to lead growth to certain geographical areas
` of the City and to encourage economic development via extension
of water and sewer lines for industrial developments.
The $5000000 designated in the Utility Department Capital
Improvements Plan as "Development Plan Water and Sewer Lines"
(Exhibit 111) shall be distributed as follows:
1. $100,000 shall be set aside to service residential and
commercial type developmentis), the specific sites shall be
determined and prioritized by the ranking methodology
outlined in Exhibit I, a copy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof. Exhibit I shall be reviewed and
approved by the Public Utilities Board on an annual basis
in order to assure that all factors relating to the ranking
of a project reflect current economic and financial
conditions. Other such approvals as may be necessary shall
also be obtained prior to final approval of proposed
development(s).
2. $4000000 sha11 be set aside for industrial development
purposes. Such funds sha11 be dedicated when an actual
prospect is available and after such development has been
analyzed using criteria for evaluating industrial
development infrastructure assistance programs as outlined
in Exhibit 11 attached herewith. If an industrial prospect
does not materialize within the first six (6) months of the
fiscal year, the funds may be redirected to either
industrial site candidate lines or residential/commercial
development plan lines after review and recommendation by
the Public Utilities Board and approval by the City Council.
3. The Executive Director of Finance of the City will assure
and
that funds are encumbered "dedicated" projects
forward into the next fiscal year.
Unspent and unencumbered Development Plan Water and Sewer
Line funds may not be carried forward to a future year.
1
I
1
I I
i
E
C
f
6326U:3-4
S
EXHIBIT I
Criteria for Ranking Valanced Growth Utility Lines
Residential/Commercial Candidates
Introduction
This ranking system has been desoigned to prioritize the list
residential and commercial develpment plan candidates for the
Utility Capital Improvement Plan's designated "Development Plan
he
Water and Sewer Lines". It is recognized that the development
potentials considered by this ranking system may change from year to
year as physical developments progress in specific areas.
be necessary, therefore, to review the ranking of proects annual basis to take into consideration changing circumstances. n an
i
1. oevelo ment Potential in the Short Term
Access by improved thoroughfare
No announcements 1.6*
Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare
Announcements 7-13**
Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare
i, Announcements lq_20***
Zoning
Plats
*Developer has not made an announcement for developing his
property and has not platted for development. Thoroughfare and
zoning, however, do exist,
**Developer has announced to the City Staff his intention to
develop and to follow up with platting. Thoroughfare and zoning,
however, do exist.
***Developer has announced and platted his development to the
City Staff; thoroughfare and zoning do exist.
2. Economic Benefits to the Cft
Residential Mulfamil
Residential SingtlefFamily
Commercial/Retail 1-5
Mixed Uses/offices 11-15
16-20
J
i
f.
g
Y
e'
J
iF
fV
1
EXHIBIT I (cont'd)
3. Balanced Growth
South and Southeast 0-4
Northeast 5-9
East 10-14
Northwest 15-18
West 19-20
4. Compact Growth
Development less than:
200 feet away from existing utility lines 20
201-100 feet away from existing utility lines 15
401-6^O feet away from existing utility lines 10
601-i'JUO feet away from existing utility lines 04
1000-2000 feet away from existing utility lines 1
over 2000 feet away from existing utility lines 0
I 5. Health, Safety d Environmental Considerations
h Reldted Circumstances: (scores range from 1-20 depending upon
circumstances)
i I
6. Engineering Concerns
Regulatory requirements 0-10
Provides off-site service to existing development 0-5
Provides off-site service to undeveloped areas 0-5
Improves system performance 0-5
7. Demand divided b Cost Ratio (Use demand points derived by
calculations)
a. Water Demand:
(1) Residential Uses
Demand a 165 GPCD x HHS x # Units x 365 d/y
where GPCD - gallons per capita per day
or also called gallons per person per day
HHS - Household size (SF-2.7 MF-1.7)
d/y d days per year
( ~ I
(2) Non-Residential Uses
V Demand a GPCD x A persons x 365 d/y based on the type of
establishment. The following list has been adopted from
the Texas Department of Health:
I
1
it
i
1
EXHIBIT I (cont'd)
Type of Establishment Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD)
Restaurants.. 18
Schools w/o cafeterias, gym or showers.... 18
Schools w/cafeterias, no gym or showers... 24
Schools w/cafeterias, gym and showers..... 30
Office Buildings 18
Hospitals.... 240
Institutions (other than hospitals)....... 120
Factories (g/p/shift, exclusive of 24
industrial wastes)
Parks w/o bathhouses . 6
Swimming pools 8 bathhouses... 12
Country Clubs (per resident member)....... 120
Drive-In theatres (per car space)......... 6
Movie Theatres (per auditorium seat)...... 6
Airports (per passenger) 6
Laundries-Self Service (gals/wash/customer) 60
Stores (total per day per washroom)....... 480
E Service stations (per vehicle served)..... 12
h b. Wastewater Flows:
h (1) Residential Uses
Flow = 132 GPCD x HHS x A of Units x 365 d/y
where GPCD = gallons per capita per day
or also called gallons per person per day
HHS = Household size (SF=2.7 MF-1.7)
d/y - days per year
(2) Non-Residential Uses
Flows - GPCD x # persons x 365 d/y based on the type of
establishment. The following list has been adopted from
the Texas Department of Health:
`---I Type of Establishment Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD)
Restaurants (per meal) 5
Schools w/cafeterias, no showers.......... 15
Schools w/cafeterias and showers.......... 20
Recreational Parks, overnight user........ 30
Recreational Parks, day user 5
Office Buildings/Factories 20
Motels 50
Hospital (per bed) 200
Nursing Home (per bed) 100
8. Cost
These costs are for costs of water and/or sanitary sewer lines
only to tie in to closest applicable city service lines and
running a:ross one side of subject developnent.
I
1
1
1
EXHIBIT I (cont'd)
9. Subtotal Points (Add Columns 1-7)
10. Priorities Before Pro Rata Survey
Based on points only, give first priority to highest points,
second priority to next highest points, etc.
11. Priorities After Pro Rata Survey
I
When list of development plan candidates water and sanitary
sewer lines are prioritized before pro rata survey, take those
protects totaling numbers of dollars available and survey
No ert owners for willingness to pay pro rata upon comp a on
o cons ruc on. Give one (1) point for each owner willing to
sign a pro rata payment contract. Re-total points and re-assign
priorities.
TOTAL POINTS
Re-assign priorities by new summation of points.
{
! ~ 1
i ~
I
i
I
i 1
1 J
6325U:5-8
I ,
J
s
is
f
KK
EXHIBIT 11
Industrial Development Infrastructure
Assistance Study
Financial analysis of industrial prospects for infrastructure
investment.
a. Formula
NET CASH FLOW = BENEFITS - INFRASTRUCTURE AND/OR
CAPACITY RELATED COSTS
Where the computation of BENEFITS is determined as follows:
Total Payroll
o Less commuters income
o Less all non-local taxes
o Plus tax revenue from Plant
i
o Plus net revenue for Electric, Water and Sanitary Sewer
o Times multiplier
Equals ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL BENEFITS
i
b. Variable
o Number of employees
o Value of plant
o Local property tax rate
o Income multiplier
o Individual taxes
co Assumption
Additional costs to serve demands of citizens for public
services are less than or equal to tax revenue received
from these individuals.
I I
f 1
f
6325U:9
I
d
i
EXHIBIT III
Criteria for Ranking Economic Development
Utility Lines
Introduction
This ranking system has been designed to prioritize the list of
Industrial Development Plan candidates for the Utility Capital
Improvement Plan's designated "Development Plan Water and Sewer
Lines". It is recognized that the development potentials considered
by this ranking system may change from year to year as physical
developments progress in specific areas. It s h a I I be necessary,
' therefore, to review the ranking of projects on an annual basis to
take into consideration changing circumstances.
1. Development Potential in the Short Term Points
Access by improved thoroughfare 1-6*
No announcements
Zoning but no plats
i ~
Access by improved tho o ughfare 7-13**
Announcements
Zoning but no plats
Access by improved thoroughfare 14-20***
Announcements
Zoning
Plats
t
property eandhahasnnot platted for development. Tho oughfare ahis
nd
zoning, however, do exist.
developoand tosfollow uupewith platting. Thoroughfare tand zoning,
- however, do exist.
***Developer has announced and platted his development to the
City Staff; thoroughfare and zoning do exist.
2. Size of Industrial Area to be Developed Points
More than 300 Acres 20
j 200 - 300 Acres 15
100 - 200 Acres 10
Less than 100 Acres 5
I
I
i
J
Q
s .
F
a
1
3. Balanced Growth Points
South and Southeast 0-4
Northeast 5-9
East 10-14
Northwest 15-18
Nest 1g-20
4. Industrial Site Owner Commitment
a. Time Frame for Development
Less than 1 year 10
2 to 5 years 5
More than 5 years 0
4. Activity
Ownership of property 10
{ Marketing of property 2-6
C. Investment of Infrastructure 5-10
j 5. Compact Growth
Development less than:
200 feet away from existing utility lines 20
201-400 feet away from existing utility IInes 15
401-600 feet away from existing utility lines 10
601-1000 feet away from existing utility lines 04
1000-2000 feet away from existing utility lines 1
over 2000 feet awry from existing utility lines 0
6. Health, Safety & Equipment Consideration
Related Considerations: (Scores rangc from 1-20 depending upon
circumstances such as pollutant versus clean non-pollutant
industry, light versus heavy industry, healthy versus unhealthy
work environment, etc.)
7. Engineering Concerns
Regulatory requirements 0-10
Provides off-site service to existing development 0-5
i Provides off-site service to undeveloped areas 0-5
Improves system performance 0-5
i
I
i
1
9
St
{
4
a
B. Demand Divided b Cost Ratio (Use demand points derived by
calculations)
a. Water Demand:
Demand - GPCD x M employees x 365 d/y based on the type of
industry. Generally this will be 25 GPCD for a
non-pollutant industry. The GPCD should, however, be
verified from each industry.
b. Wastewater Flows:
Flows = GPCD x N employees x 365 d/y based on the type of
industry. Generally this will be 22 GPCD for a
non-pollutant industry. The GPCD should, however, be
verified from each industry.
9. Cost
These costs are for costs of water and/or sanitary sewer lines
only to tie in to closest applicable city service lines and
running across one side of subject development.
10. Subtotal Points (Add Columns 1-7)
i I
11. Priorities before Pro Rata Survey
i
Based on points only, give first priority to highest points,
h second priority to next highest points, etc.
12. Priorities after Pro Rata Survey
When list of development plan industrial candidates water and
sanitary sewer lines are prioritized before pro rata survey,
take those projects totaling numbers of dollars available and
survey property o;-ners for willingness to pay pro rata upon
completion of construction. Give one (1) point for each owner
willing to sign a pro rata payment contract. Re-total points
and re-assign priorities.
TOTAL POINTS
Re-assign priorities by new summation of points.
1 '1
i
1
6325U:10-12
I
i
I
i4
I
p 1
l i
1
EXHIBIT IV
Flow Chart Approval Process for
Development Plan Water and Sewer Lines
1nlTC-R I
ICIP Projects Including Development I
Man Lines for I
I 1. Residential/Commercial Sites I
I 2. Industrial Sites I
I 3. Industrial Development Infra-I
I structure Assistance Program
I U T I L I TY PLANNING RT_ l_F_DEY_LMM_MI
ISTAFF to Review Residential/Commercial
land Industrial Site Candidates and I
[prioritize according to ranking I {
Icriteria.
I
I to I
IPdZ in context of CIP document. I
IP Z E IEW and Recommend Lines 1-o l
(City Council in context of CIP i
Idocument. I
i I
ITTTYY6UALTC" eve eTopmenTl { TO REVIEW AND [Plan Lines for res/com sites and industrial i
Isite alternatives plus the guidelines for I
lindustrial development infrastructure assis- I
Itance Program alternatives. I
IUCTGBE T un s maael I a -EACH : a I
(available for Industrial Dev. ! Itakes action to construct I
(infrastructure Assist. Program I Iresidential/commercial I
(Funds to be held for 6 months onl Idevelopment plan lines. I
factual candidates. I
► ~ I
{ IAPRIL 1: If funds have not been used I
lby Industrial Dev. Infrastructure I
[Assist. Program alternative funds, I
Imay be redirected to industrial site I
Icandidate lines or res/com developmentl
[plan lines after being brought to PUB I
I land P&Z for recommendation on I
lallocation. PUB and PR then makes
Irecommendation to City Council.
i 6325U:13
i
4
1
a i
r
i
4
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
November 16, 1988
11. CONSIDER INFORMATION, FINAL APPROVAL AND REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT
DOCUMENT.
LaForte made a motion to approve the concept and methodology of
this policy as it is presented. Second by Chew. LaForte
questioned whether another meeting with the P&Z was necessary in
January. Nelson indicated he wculd like the Board's guidance on
this. Nelson explained we do not have a list of lines selected
for ttis process, and we have never had a public hearing on this
yet.
Chew indicated he was under the impression that we had had a
joint meeting with the P&Z. Nelson explained we did have for
the purpose of reviewing the Five Year Capital Improvement
Plan. However the proposed meeting is to take input from
industrial /commercial people and citizens. We will also discuss
and outline to the public what criteria we will use to give
money to the candidate lines. This will be done at the first
meeting in February. The Board indicated their concurrence with
E this procedure.
Laney called for a vote. All ayes, no nays, motion carried.
M
' f
a
i
6325U:20
e
1
fA
S
w
Joint P&Z and PUB
February 8, 1989 D
Rc~lILAJh1
Page 13 approved and started. He added that though there are
four major projects listed, it actually is to create J
one major project. 11
Mr. Ham reported that one year ago, when the Denton
Development Plan was near finalization, one of the
provisions was tc have the Utilities Department set +
aside funds, if available, to assist in encouraging
industrial, residential, and commercial development
in the City of Denton. He stated that the Public
Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion agreed with the concept.
Mr, am continued that the Public Utilities Board asked
the rater/Waste Water Department to set aside $500,000
each year in the CIP under the item Development Plan -
Water and Sewer Lines. Mr. Ham stated that the
$500,000 will be equally split between both water and
sewer lines.
I ~ 1
Mr. Ham explained that on October 1st each year,
$400,000 of the $500,000 would be set aside for six
months until April Ist, to be used for any industrial
prospects or "hot" prospects that would come into
Denton for the purpose to develop. These prospects
would be presented to the Public Utilities Board,
Planning and Zoning Commission, and City Council to
determine if these funds should be used to develop
water and sewer lines for the property for industrial
development. If the $400,000 is not encumbered by
April let, the unspent monies would be added to the
$100,000 to be set aside for residential or commercial
candidate lines. These monies would be used for the
highest ranking candidate lines whether they are
industrial, residential, or commercial. The remaining
$500,000, original total, would continue on until
September 30th or the end of the fiscal year. At that
time, the Director of Finance would insure that any
monies encumbered for specific candidate lines, would
be carried forward to the next fiscal year. Mr. Ham
stated that any monies that are not committed to
specific projects would be dropped off at the end of
the fiscal year. As of October of the next fiscal
year, another $500,000 would be added tv the CIP for
consideration and the process would start all over.
Mr. Ham explained Exhibits 1, II, and III in the
Commissioners back up regarding to the ranking system
and how it is used. Mr. Ham stated that Exhibit I
ii
i
Joint PSZ and PUB
February 8, 1989
Page 14R111ff~1~~
would be used for residential and commercial candi-
date lines. Exhibit III would be used for industrial
candidate lines. Exhibit II is the economic model,
designed by city staff and the Chamber of Commerce,
to evaluate the benefits that an interested industrial
or "hot" prospect would give to the City of Denton.
These benefits would include items such as the net cash
flow, the size of the building, and the amount of job
openings that would be available for Denton residents.
Mr. Ham concluded with the Development Plan Guidelines
portion and proceeded with the list for residential and
commercial candidate lines.
Mr. Ham stated that the list included the location of
the candidate lines, the size of the line, and the cost
to install the water and/or sewer lines. Mr. Ham noted
that on the candidate water lines, the total was
$10,395,200 and for sewer the total was $6,187,597. He
said that the totals are for all the properties in the
city limits that are presently not receiving city water
and/or sewer service.
Ms. Brock asked Mr. Ham what area would involve the
Gamble's property. Mr. Ham stated that it would
include area A-5 that involved:
i
A-5 3,200' of 18" WL on west side of Bonnie
Brae from Hwy 380 to Windsor and Payne Dr.
to serve residences and upper pressure plane,
Ms. Gamble stated that she felt area A-3 would include
their area. A-3 included:
A-3 3,200' of 12" WL along east side of Bonnie
Brae from Hwy 380 to Windsor and Payne Dr.
and
for lower pressure plane.
Mr. Ham stated that both tines would be needed to serve
both the upper and lower pressure planes though the
Gamble's could tie onto either line.
j Mr. Thompson asked if the list of candidate lines were
i for gust the residents that were requesting service.
Mr. Ham stated that the list included all areas in the
city limits that did not have water and/or sewer
service at this time.
i
v
i
f i
i
J
Joint P3Z and PUB
February 8, 1989 55~~
Page 15 r'
R A Mr. Ham addressed the list of industrial candidate
lines and stated that staff did not put a cost figure
on the listing but he did have an estimate if the
Commission wanted to know it. He said there would be
approximately $525,000 for water lines and $230,000 for
sewer lines with a total of $755,000 for the industrial
candidate lines. He stated that this was not for "hot"
prospects but for five sites that the Chamber of
Commerce and staff had identified as potential
industrial sites.
Mr. Ham explained the flow charts both in the
Commissioners backup and on the transparency. After
a slight misunderstanding of the flow chart from
I Mr. LaForte, the meeting continued.
I
Mr. Ham stated that he would like to recommend that
C the Commission receive and reconfirm the use of the
Development Plan Guidelines, receive and consider the
public's input, and receive the list from staff
regarding residential, commercial, and industrial
candidates for water and sewer lines with staff being
j allowed to continue with the ranking of all the lines.
I
` Mr. Ham concluded that the number of candidate lines
and their associated construction costs far exceed the
available $500,000 per year.
Mr. Fngelbrecht asked how the candidate lines for
Exhibit I and III are ranked. Mr. Ham said by points.
He aaded that the residential and commercial lines are
ranked differently than the industrial lines.
r Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the
guidelines, accept the requests that were made by the
public for further consideration, and approve staff's
candidate list ea presented. Seconded by Mr. Kamman
and unanimously carried (5-0).
Joint meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
I
I
l
1