HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-21-1989 ti
~ r
A%,NI) A
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
February 21, 1989
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
February 21, 1989, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of
City hall, 215 Fs. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the
following items will be considered:
Note: Any Item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be conuidered as part of the Agenda for the 1
Regular Meeting.
5:30 p.m.
1. Receive an interim report from the Solid Waste
Advisory Committee.
i
2. Receive a report regarding Oak-Hickory Street paving
i widths.
i
3. Continuo discussions regarding a proposed street
closing policy. ;
4. Executive Session: I
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(0), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
H. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Act. 6252-17
V.A.'1'.S.
1. Consideration of a water purchase from the
City of Commerce, Texas.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g,,
Act 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Consideration of appointments to the Airport
Advisory Hoard, the Human Resources
Committee, the Citizens Traffic Safety
Support Commission and the Housinq Task
Force.
2. Continue evaluations of the City Manager.,
City Attorney, and Municipal Judge.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
February 21, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City
Hall. 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following
i items will be considered:
I
1
1
J/ I
i
I
City of Denton City Council Agenda
f Febrtaty 21, 1989
r Pagel
I
7;00 p.m.
1. Considor approval of a resolution in appreciation of
W. W. "Dick,' Klein.
2. Public Hoarings
I
A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance amending Planned Dovolopmont-83 and
approving a detailed plan. Petitioner is First
State Bank. The property is currently zoned for
two-family and multi-family land uses and is more
fully described as tots 25, 26 and 27 of Block A,
and Lots 20-34 of Block B of the Audra Meadows
Addition. The property is locat(±d on thu east
and west sides of Bayfio)d Drlvu and nn f.ho south
side of Brittany Drive. If approved, the
property may be utilized for single family
residential lots with a minimum of 6,000 square
foot. x•89 Q14, (Planning and 7oning commission
recommends approval).
B. [fold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance changing the zoning from the
agricultural (A) zoning district to the general
retail (OR) zoning district on approximately
three (3) acres of land located on U.S. Highway
380 and approximately 2,100 feet west of Trinity
Road. Potitioner is Gerald Brooke. The property
is more fully described in the Moreau Forrest
Survey, Abstract No. 417. If approved, the
property may be utilized for any purpose in the
general retail zoning classification. Z_-U-02
2.
(Planning and zoning Commission recommends
approval).
C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinarlco providing for a change from office
Distric. (0) to Two-Family Dwelling District
(2-F) classification and use designation for
Block 2, Lots 1.22 of the Southridge Addition and
for Block 4, Lots 1A, 1B, and 1C of the
Southridge Center Addition; providing for a
change from General Retail District (OR) to
1 } Multi-Family Ledo 11Ing District-1 (MF•1)
I classification and use designation for Block 2,
Lot 3 of the Southridge Cantor Addition;
providing for a change from Office District (0)
to Multi-Family Dwelling Restricted District
(MF-R) classification and use designation are
Block 3, Lots 1-6, and block 4R, Lots 1-11 of the
l'
r
i
r
City of Denton City Council Agenda
Fobruary 21, 1989
~ Page 3
6outhridge Center Addition; providing for a
change from office District (0) to Multi-Family
1)welling-1 District (MV-1) classification and use 1J1
designation for the Hollyhills Addition and the
3.809 acres of land located in the John Meclowan
Survey, Abstract No. 797, as more particularly
described horein. knVOLA49. (Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval).
D. Bold a public hearing and consider adoption oan
ordinance amending an existing specific use
Permit in an agricultural zoning district.
Petitioner is W. D. Byrne, representing YMCA of
Metropolitan Dallas. The Specific Use Permit
allows the property to be used as a YMCA
facility. if approved, the amendment will permit
the relocation of a parking lot from the northern
to the western boundary of the site, The
property is located at the north west corner of
Windsor Drive and Riney Road. 7;-_95-
(Planning and zoning Commission recommends
approval).
R. Bold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance granting a specific Use Permit for a r
commercial amusement (outdoor) use in an
agricultural zoning district. Petitioner is
Scott Campbell. If approved, the property may be I
utilized as a A ntature golf course and related
building. The property is located on the south
and Street
side of cardinal McKinney
more tfuits lly idescribedoaswat2
acre tract in the M. Yaochum Survey, Abstract No.
1442. zL-88-026. (Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval). I
F. Hold a public hearing on a request to change the
name of S1ocktus Road to Page Road, (The Historic
Landmark Commission recommends denial and the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial).
0. Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation
by the City of Denton, Texas of certain property
located al rig the Elm Fork of the Trinity River.
(A-59).
Receive a citizen's report from James Singleton
3, regarding the sign ordinance.
i
1
1
I
i
i
y
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 21, 1989
Pago 4
4, Consent. Agenda
Y.ach of those Items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will
roval of the Consent oAgebasis of the nda authorizes the
recommendations, App
City Manager or tits designee to implement each item in
accordance with the staff recommendations.
Meted below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items 5.A., 5.8.). This listing is provided
on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any
item prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid 09942 - Aerial Bucket Devices
2, Hid 09868 - Load Control Switches
{
3. P.O. 0 89321 - Davis Utility Hyd., Inc.
I
5. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services.
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids.
C. consider adoption of an ordinance amending the
schedule of rates for electrical services by
adding a new schedule DI, (Decorative Lighting).
(The Public Utilities Board recommends approval),
P D. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the
' rates for commercial sanitation collection
services in accordance with Chapter 12 of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton.
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
fees for sign permits, licenses, and the
registration of nonconforming portable signs, as
provided for in article 1.7 of Appendix B-Zoning
of the Code of Ordinances.
i
i 1
Y
r
City of Denton city council Agenda
February 21, 1989
Pago 5
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance calling and
ordering an election to be hold in the City of
Donton, Texas, on May 6, 1989, and in the event a
runoff election is required, on May 20, 1989, for
the purpose of electing four councilpersons to
the City Council of the City of Denton, Texan for
places 1, 2, 3, and 4; ordering that the punch
card electronic voting system adopted by Denton
County be used in said Aloction; designating
voting places and appointing election officials
and providing for election supplies.
6. Resolutions
s A. Consider approval of a resolution declaring that
the land heroin described is no longer needed by
1 the public for road purposes and requesting that
the State of Texas release the land to the City
of Denton at no cost.
i
a ? B. Consider approval of a resolution requesting the
closing of a portion of Bell Avenue from East
Hickory to Prairie April 22 and 23, 1.989 for
Spring Fling.
C Consider approval of a resolution granting
approval to the Denton County Housing Finance
Corporation for the use of its series 1989 Single
Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds for acquiring home
mortgages related to homes within the City of
Denton, Texas.
7. Consider a motion to approve the Community Development
Block Ornnt funding criteria.
8. Consider a motion to approve the Human Services
Committee's funding criteria.
9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
A. January Budget Recap
10. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
i D. Board Appointments
11. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas,
I
f
t
tK ?
1
City of Denton City Council Agenda
February 21, 1989
Pago 6
12. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(0), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Act. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Por3onnol/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
y
4 C E R T 1 F 1 C A T E
1 certify that the above notice of mooting was posted on the
bulletin board aL the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas
on the day of 1989 at o'clock
(a.m.) (P.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
3048C
s
J
ti
V
T -F
I
f
II ~
r
I
i
I
1
-L-LJII lot
1
i
F
5 ' 1
ItI~
I
Q
1
QITYOt DENTONj 78XAS 216 E. McKINNEYI DENTON. TEXAS 762011 TELEPNONF (817) 6688200 +
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lloyo Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Bill Angolo, Director of Cormunity services
DAI'Fi February 16, 1989
V ~
j! SUWF=i SOLID tZM ALTF.FMTIVF'S Q .MME STATUS KYORr
i
E As you know, the Solid Waste Alternatives Camrittee (Sor) which was
' appointed by the City Council to evaluate and provide rccurmendatiors on
the City's suture role in the provision of solid waste services includ-
r ! ing the appropriate course of Action for the disposal of solid waste has 1
riet regularly since August, 1988. The criTittee's review and evaluation
of these issues has consisted of a review of the City's current system;
local, state and federal provisions pertaining to solid waste manage-
ment; a survey of 19 Texas cities; prasentations from solid waste
profPssionalA, including the two m1or private con nips operating in
Donton; And the review and analysis of various studies, periodicals and
other data ooliectrd by the staff,
Over the last several months, the Onmmittee has considered whether the
City should continue to operate as the sole provider of residential
solid waste collection and has considered the potential impact of
continuing to allow open commercial and industrial collection. In
addition, the Cormittee has considered the impact of selling the City's
cat rcial collection systwj and, in effect, privatizing that service,
I~ and has analyzed the potential of assigning service territories within
the City.
In the area of disposal options, the Ccnmittcv has considered a variety
I of alternatives for the disposal of solid waste including contracting
with an existing landfill to accept Denton's waste, the eontimotion of
local larAfilling, the develor".nt of a transfer station, the establish-
ment of a waste-to-energy prograon and the privatization of disposal
service.
1
2ba021689D9"
I J
SOLID WASTE ALTf', NrIVFS CrOhP 177 GPATUS YOT-ORT
February 16, 1989
Page 2
We have also discussed with the Carmittno, the previously planned
commercial rate increase designed for the early payoff of tie landfill
dn1)t and to balance the cost of service lrtwrpn the residential and
ccrmcrcial customers, on this matter, the Cermittee has reccmnended
that the City proaxnd with its original plan as the oomercial custamre
have bcxn notified of the rate increase.
While the C(rrittee is vciy close to completing its Initial nssign.ments
and should be prepared to presnnt its rnccmm~endations to tho council
_ within th•) next few months, we have discussed the po3sibility of expaml-
Ing the role of the Carrdtteo in respect to state mandated requirements.
'c'hat is, the Texas Solid Waste Management Act requires each municipality
to submit a Solid Waste Management Plan to the Texas Department of
Health by December 31, 1989. Although the staff has ccrpleted much of
thin work for this plan, state regulations require review by a Citizens
Advisory Cammitteo prior to the formal adoption of the plan. Given the
knowledge which the Ccrmittee's mrerlxors have acquired over the last
several months in thn area of Solid Waste Management, it would be
prudent to utilize this Ccrmittee to fulfill the state requirmxents,
Staff has discussed rhis matter with the Committee recently and they
appear willing to accept the ridded responsibility.
Should you have any questions or comments on the activities of the
Ccmnittee, please let us know,
II
A Arge o
1SA/sc
2ba02168909
I
2ba02168909/2
s
DA7E1 February 7, 1989
CITY MUNCIL TWORT agtT
TOr Mayor and Mtrbera of the City Carncil
FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUA7FJCfr consider Adoption of
cial Sanitation an Ordinance Establishing Rates for Comrnr_
Collection Scarvicee, ~
RIM44 NDATICNi
The staff recommends approval of the ordirkvice which establishes Owmercial
Sanitation Rates at a level sufficient to recover disposal oor~.,
SLMWY t
Ito proposed rate increases for dumpster custamrs averages approximately 99
and the rate increase for roll-off rustcmers is 16.64.
~VCKGROUNDi
This is the second step of the two-step program of cotnmrcial rote increases
discussed with the City Council last year which is designed to enablo the
Solid Waste Division to recover the additional cost of di
~k
by the reduced life expectancy of the Landfill, sposal brought about
PROGWIS DIE A)ritfiM OR GNOUPS AFFMMM r
All City Adjustment have boon sent telallwoure Comrncrri Letters regarding Customers,
rate Commercial Solid Waste Clrstcrners,
FISCAL IMPACTt
I
` At current servico levels, the rata lncrea.se will
$90,000 per year from roll-off and a roxi Ogenerate
OOfr aPProers er
Yom'. As of September PP mdtely $54,000 frrn► dutpstc~rs per res of tho Landfill debtt This ma8tches o9 rea imat s fromdaf yearuago,, disposition
respect Ily submitted,
4tyg4
~e
r
j ~ es I
SZs vri terxi t Solid Waste Division
Approved r
I
e
Director of munity services
kv01078917/1
i
V
s
I
I
gill
444444;J=ff Will, 1 91
I
F
I ,
j I
1
r
I
~ E
~ i
i
t ~
i
I
1
~ 3d
C1Ty o1 DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILOING / PENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 868.8307
Office of the City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell. City Manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: February 16, 1989
I
SUBJECTt Lane Width on Oak 6 Hickory
Attached you will find the minutes of the Historic Landmark
Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission from the
discussions on Oak and Hickory. As you can see from the
minutes, there was lengthy discussions at both meetings.
Besides that, we have had a number of neighborhood meetings to
try and disseminate information and to gather comments.
We have attempted to look at each of the streets individually
and in sn,ae instances, specific pieces of it. In each of these
cases, the Historic Landmark Commission and P 6 Z made specific
recommendations about there sections. Finally, we have added
an option or effect column for the Council to consider when
reviewing these roads.
Hickory Street from Welch to Bonnie Brae had the least amount
of comments and the least amount of public input. The existing
street section varies in width from 35, to 451 The Staff Is
original proposal was for 371 of width which would provide twu
lanes of traffic and one lane of parking and could ultimately
be re-aligned to three lanes of traffic if such a need ever
materialized. The Historic Landmark Commission did not comment
t much on the section from Welch to Bonnie Brae. They were more j
concerned with the section from Welch to Carroll. Their main I
comment was to convert Hickory to a two-way street for the
length of it. Several months ago. Council asked that Staff
1 investigate the possibility of doing a comprehensive review of
our transportation plan. We have been collecting proposals
from consultants and COG regarding performing this work and
will be submitting a proposal for consideration during the
budget process, our suggestion would be to wait and look at
this option in a comprehensive way at the time the
transportation plan review is authorized by the Council.
Nothing in this proposal would preclude making such a shift if
i such was determined to be desirable at a later date.
i
I
Lloyd V. llarrell
February 16, 1989
Page 2
Planning and ilth the provisos that m parking could i be deleted mine as the
street could be narrowed) in front of multi-family or
non-residential property. This would mean that the street
could vary from 34' to 36' of width for two lanes of traffic
and one lane of parking in existing sections depending on how
much of the gutter section would be used for the parking lane
and to 37' if you wanted to narrow some of the 45' sections.
Our suggestion would be to standardize it to 371, It still
eliminates the wide excessive pavements and yet provides us
with flexibility in the future. Staff fools that this standard
is basically consistent with discussions at the P & Z level and
design work can commence.
On Oak Street, there was much more comment from Carroll to
E Bonnie Brao. We have broken it into several sections to
clarify some of the suggestions of HLC and P & Z since there
wore separate comments made for separate areas.
From Carroll to Avenue C. the width varies from 34 114' to 361
wide, and the street is basically two lanes of travel and one
lane of parking. In some of the western sections, there has
not been any history of parking on the street. Again, out
original staff proposal was for a 371 roadway which would have
allowed two lanes of traffic, one lane of parking and the
41 possibility of converting the street to throe lanes. The
Nlstotic Landmara Commission suggested that the exact footprint
be rebuilt for this section of street, i.e. the street would
vary from 34 1/4' to 36'. They also wanted us to look at
converting it to a two way street section. We would suggest
this should be looked at when we look at the overall
transportation plan. Planning & Zoning also recommended that
we leave the street as is from Carroll to Avenue C. i.e. two
lanes of travel, one lane of parking, and the street varying
from 34 1/4' to 361. In the options or effects category, the
Staff would just note that since the street does widen and
narrow somewhat, it does make for subtle changes when
travelling the length of the street. Also, if the footprint is
built, then it would preclude us from ultimately using it ao a
three lane street if that is needed in the future since there
would be problem with lane widths and our standard sections.
On the section from Avenue C to Avenue G. the street varies in
width from 36' to 371. It could be used for two lanes of
travel and one lane of parking. Currently, it is used for two
lanes of travel and two lanes of parking. Again, our original
ptop0031 was for 37, providing for two lanes of traffic and one
lane of packing and ultimately could be expanded to three lanes
of traffic. The Historic Landmark Commission suggested that I
this section should not be widened at all, but the footprint 1
i
W~
Lloyd V. Harrell
February 16, 1989
Palle 3
should be left as is. They also wanted to look at converting
it to two-way. Planning and Zoning suggested that the
footprint also be left allowing for two lanes of traffic and
one or two lanes of parking. They suggested to Council that
they leave the two lanes of parking and change it if there are
some safety problems. Under the options and effects column, we
have listed a couple of concerns or points that we think are
pertinent. If you want to leal•~i the two-way traffic, i.e. two
lanes of traffic with iwo lanes of parking, we think the street
is too narrow. Normal et,;ndard sections would be 12, lanes for
two-way traffic plus 8' parking lanes. If that were the case,
the normal street sections should be 41' rather than 36' or
371. We think there would be some safety problems if the
street is not widened as the use continues to grow in this
area. We would also be looking at building a street that is
substandard according to our current subdivision standards. If
the street is left at 36' nr 371, we would suggest to you that
two lanes of travel and one lane of parking be allowed. This
would again allow for safe movement of traffic and still allow
parking in the neighborhood.
Finally, the section of Oak from Avenue a to Bonnie Drae varies
in width from 38' to 421 . It is used as tvo lanes of traffic
and one lane of parking in most areas. The Historic Landmark
commission did not really talk very much about this area of the
road. Planning and Zoning made comment that where there is
multi-family areas or off street parking provided that they
thought going to 371 would bo reasonable. We would again
sugqest to you that 371 allowing two lanes of travel and one
street, still icarryouall the eliminate unnecessary and could ultimately the
used as a three lane kind of section if that was the desire of
the Council in the future.
Finally, on Hickory between Carroll and Welch, there was
discussion by HLC and P 6 Z. We have not looked at this
particular section in very much detail simply because it was
making ttwoo lanes ofBtravelsand tMIX lanesoof p that we look at
it to a two-way section. Planning 6 Zoning sucking or convert
it as existing configuration with three lanes of travelwandeone
lane of parking. Again, we are suggesting to you since it was
not in the 1986 Bond Issue, we should leave it as is and look
at it again in the transportation study.
In summary, the Staff has some problems with the western
sections of oak if we leave as is and we continue to have
parking on both sides of it. The other sections can be rebuilt
as is, and we can put two lanes of traffic and one lane or
I
I
i
1
Lloyd V. Harrell
February 16, 1989
Page 4
parking. It would preclude some expansion in future years.
Staff has always suggested that the 37' foot section be used to
provide a street that would be used Just as is now, i.e. In the
one-way sections, it would have two lanes o[ travel and one
lane of parking. Staff also suggested that if this narrower
section is used, no areas of oak Street would have two lanes of
parking. However, if this is the desire of the Council for two
lanes of parking west of Avenue C, we would suggest a little
bit wider street,
In conclusion, I would also offer that the 371 sections, or the
narrower sections, can be built without taking any trees.
There are some existing trees along both of these streets that
are in very poor shape right now. If we disturb the soil near
them, it may cause some further damage to root system, that we
cannot assess at this time. However, we believe we will not
have to remove any trees to build either the 371 sections, or
the narrower sections, or in the area west of AvPnuo C the 411
sections with the exception of one tree
Just
and Oak Street. This tree was discussed at P & 2 tlevel. F & Z
understood that we would have to remove the tree because of
some drainage improvements that we will have to make. Although
they understood this, they did not mention it in their minutes
as approving that one removal. But I suggest to you,
understand that and were in agreement that that tree wouth did
ldyhave
to be removed no matter Wiat section was built.
At the P & 7 meeting, the commissioners asked the Staff to
notify the effected property owners of the meeting where the
Council would make these width decisions. We are giving all of
the information to the Council now so that they will have a
chance to review it and ask for any other information. We
would suggest that we schedule this item for the regular
session on Match 7, This will allow us to notify all the
residents if that is the CounA l's desire.
Both Frank and myself will be at the Tuesday meeting. If we
can provide further information to you or the Council, we would
be happy to try and answer any questions.
Bick Sveh a
Deputy City Manager
AS:bw
444eM
Attachments
i
k
5
r ,
P
OAK / HICKORY PLANNING ISSUES
EXISTING STREET SECTION ORIGINAL HISTORIC
LOCATION WIDTH RANGE EXISTING USE STAFF PROPOSAL LANDMARK COMM PLANNING 6 ZONING CoMli CPTIONS/EFFECTS TO CONSIDER
1. HICKCRY 35' to 45' 351-45' b/b 2 TR, 37' b/b providing NOT ADDRESSED Not to be widened. 2 TR 37' b/b Eliminates excessive pavements
Welch to ) PK Lanes for 2 TR Lanes, and I PK Lanes - However, currently unused as parking lane
Bonnie Bras I PK Lanes; parking can be deleted In
Portions - 45' Ultimates 3 TR "CONVERT TO front of multl-family or 1]1
b/b basically Lanes TWO WAY nonresidential property
unused as parking 341 to 36' - 2 TR + I PK
37' • 3 TR
2. OAK 34.25' to 42' Carroll tc Ave C 37' b/b providing DON'T WIDEN Carroll to Avenue C •"(U 34.25 - 36'• 2 TR + I PK
Carroll 34.254 to 36' for 2 TR Lanes, Leave footprint Precludes safe widening to 3 TR
to Bonnie 2 TR + I PK I PK Lanes 34.25 to 36 - 2 TR + 1 PK (2) 37' • 2 TR + I PK) Ultimately could I
Brae Ultimates 3 TR 'CONVERT TO _ be solely widen to 3 TR
Avenue C to Ave G Lanes TWO WAY Avenue C to Avenue G (I) 41' - 2 TA + 2 PK
36' to 37' w 2 TR + 36' to 37' - 2 TR + I PK with standard lane wldths
i PK or 2 TR + 2 PK or a 2 TR + 2 PK (2) 36' to 37' Remove
IPKLane -2 TR+IPK
"M 36' to 37' Leave 2 TR + 2 PK
_ Non Standard Section
Ave 0 to Bonn le Or Avenue G to Bonnle Brae (1) 37' 2 TR - I PK This eliminates
38' to 42' 2 TR 4 38' to 42' • 2 TR + I PK unneeded/excess pavement) J
I PK 3 TR • Ultimate
3, HICKORY 42,4 42.4 Not In Project NOT IN PROJECT Convert south Leave Existing Cinflg. Leave as Is, not voted In 1986 Bond Issue
Carroll LIMITS side trawl 3 TR Lanes + I PK where Perform preventative maintenance as needed
to Welch lane to perk multi-family 6 non- In next few years (crack seal, overlay or ,
lane residentlal (exists on recycle)
"Proposed south side)
conflguratlon
2TR+2PK
CONVERT TO
TWO WAY
TA • Travel
PK - Parking
b/b• Back to Beck
Ir * To be examined as pert of comprehensive review of the transportation plnn.
"Street sections on Obk (above) wlII not be standard - main Issues to consider
0642E
I
J
LJ i1
I I
a
t
fl
't
OAK / HICKORY PLANNING ISSUES
SPECIAL NOTES:
A. Lane Widths 11' - One Way
12' - Two Way
g' - Parking
4' - Curb 6 Gutter not considered in width
B. All radii at intersections to be 20' minimum according to
City standards.
C. Traffic design and parking changes to be routed through
Traffic Safety Commission.
D. (I) Proposed parking on Oak to remain on south side
Carroll to Bonnie Brae
(2) Parking on Hickory to remain on north side Carroll
to Bonnie Brae.
E. Tree Considerations / Modifications
1. Liming operations will not be normal 1' behind curb;
1 save trees by staying at back of curb and avoiding
roots.
2. Small horizontal curves will be added to protect
trees if needed.
3. Hickory - W^lch to Bonnie Brae - 0 Trees Removed
I I
Oak - Carroll to Bonnie Brae - 1 Large Hackberry
Tree Removed
_Hiicckoory - Carroll to Welch - Not in project - 0
ref- e- Izemoved
0642E
I
i
I
I
~ I
q .
a
t t
a P5: Mtn,te;
' November 3!), 1999
i Page o
and the City Council In accordance wltB he uePJate procedures
set out In the Denton Development Pian. the Eaecutlre
Director for Planning and Development shall be responsible
fur preparing and updating the tutensity calculations for
each of the moderate and low intensity areas In accordance
with the standard methodology and boundaries contained in
Appendix A.
Ms. Brock stated that staff would not be changing the
boundaries but would be changing the calculations,
Mr. Persaud agreed,
str. Engelbrecht staled that the calculatIone were iesigued
after the Plan was approved. He asked IF this was just an
administratlye 4etall. Mr. Persaud said yes.
Ms. Brock stated that the policy should be changed to read
it
this appendix is to be developed by a committee
comprised of rr-resentatives .
r LECISION; Ms. .pock moved to recommend approval of the
policy as amended. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock and
unanimously carried (7-0).
' F. Consider making A recommendation on Article 17, Signs, of
I Appendix 81 Zoning of the Code of Ordinances,
STAFF REPORT: Ms, Carson stated that the Government
e atlonf ommIttea has requested more time to consider the
thanes and submit those changes for the Plannlug and Zoning
meeting on December 11th,
I Ms, Brock asked Ma. Corson to review the schedule of the
I moratorium, Ms. Carson maid that the City Council has
r extended the mor+toriun until February 21, 191R. The
1 reri rement tar amending the ordinance is that tha Planning
I` and Zoning Comntsslon make a recommendation to the City
Council and than the Council would hold iiubllc hearln on
the Issue and make A decision, She said that the Plann~n
and Zoning Commi pion will have only one meeting in December
and the City Council would be meeting nn the 3rd and 17th of
f January and the 7th And Zlsl of February. The City Council
i would need an addltion+t work fission for consideration
before a motion would be made and the Council has previously
' toque eteA that this type of item not be scheduled for a
` IpeclaI called meeting,
1 He. Carson continued that a chart In the Commissioners back
up shooed the sign requirements In other cltles,
Hs. Brock asked when was the last possible date to have the
draft sign ordinance brought to the Commission, Ms. Carson
stated the first meeting in January in order for staff to
` advertise fifteen days prior to the City Council public
f heating,
G. Consider making a recommendatlon on in amendment to the
` Denton Development Plan to add a note to the lhorouehfara
Plan in relation to Oak/Hickory Street,
SUFf AEPOktt Mr, Robbins stated that In the Commissioners'
packets was a copy of the pollcy amendment and the reran-
y nendatlons that were made by the Historic Landmark
f 1 Conmisslon.
! Mr, Robbins sold that at the last Mlstorlc Landmark
Commission meeting, staff had expressed concerns and after
discussion the Historic Landmark Commission made the
fol- lowing recommendations:
1) oak Street between Bonnle Brie and Cortoll Boulevard
should not be wider than allowing for two travel lanes
ppSus on-stre
I ft jet psrking In selected areas and/or bike
lams eeectad areal.
h
3
3
1)
1
i
Ph: `It rtut•s .k.
v do v.•mher Sn, 1i34
Fige 7 ~
2) hickory Street from Carroll Roulevard to h'elch Street
should be no wider than aIIowIn4 three t n vet fangs
and on -street parking an one side of Hickory Street
and/or bike lanes. iii ckory Street from Welch to
Bonnie Brae should be no wider than allowing two
travel lanes and on-street parking &rid,or bike lanes,
Mr. Robbins stated that the Hickory Street re3vest could not
be supported by staff at this time.
3) In additton to the travel lanes, parking that is 1
allowed on both sides of Oak and Hickory Streets
should be allowed to remain on bath sides, except as
follows: a) where multi-Family development in excess
of IU units per acre or non-residential development
exist- on--street porking may be eliminated on the
side of the street with such a multi-famlly or
non-residcntin% area. b) Between Jagoe and Avenue C.
parking on the north side of Oak Street may be removed
after a finding by the City Council that such would be
in the interest of safe and efficient traffic flow.
On--street parking on the south side of this section of i
Oak should not be eliminated unless the Council finds
that placing a bike lane in this section is In the
public Interest by maximlotng the transportation
capabllitles of existing streets,
Mr. Svehla said that included in the back-up was a letter
from the Engineering Depirtmenv retarding the Oak and
Hickory street pro)ect, He said that what Is stated in the
policy statement regarding two travel limit would not be a
problem with Engineering, The possible problem may be in
the future. He sold that he felt the 37 foot versus the 33 1
foot width of the road would be acceptable, Ihere are some
concerns with Avenue C to Avenue G and leaving the street
the sane widths. I
Mr, Engelbrecht asked what the current minimum standards are
for residential streets, Mr. Svehla stated that he believed
It was 40 feet, ,
Mr, En elbrecht asked it Engineering planned on recon• J
struct~no the Itreets. Mr. Svehla stated that It the roads
were In goad shape and the drainage requirements met the
standards, "constructing the streets mey not be mecelsary.
He added that the bond Issue was to rebuild Oak and Hickory
Streets and not side streets that tie into Oak and Hickory
Street.
Mr, Engelbrecht asked if the utilities were replaced, what
iiaedotdconlirucetoneoritodatosbe met. rdfne Mr. vehlaolalde
it would have to meet with today's standards,
Ms. Brock asked it the sidewalks would be replaced,
Mr. Svehla said the funds would b; appiled first to the
rtconitruction
the s sidewalkf~y funds are left over,
used l for to and
they w
George Stuart, 2003 W. Uak Denton, president of the west Oak
Property Owners Association, stated that the association was
In support of the ppolicy to show no thenIts for West Oak
from Ja -is to Dome I Brae, Ile said that redeotgning the
street II the opposite ides of the property owner t. By
widening the street, the,peed limit would be Increased and
so would problems with traffic generstlon.
P Ms. Brock asked Mr. Stuart If he had any documentation
stating that there would be n ImereaI of o eedlnB if the
street was widened. Mr. Stuart slid no but because the
street is close to the coIIait he assumed these would be.
Mr. Cochran stated that he was in support of the exloting
footprint but also felt it would alter the speed of the
1
I
1~
T
e
c
F57 4t'1'1L^.5
Anrember )~I)5~
Pate s
drivers on the road, lie said that he is concerned wl th
safety if the speed is Increased, lie added that he would
urge the Commissioners to look it west Oak as neithborhno.1
and not as a corridor.
Ms. Brock stated that she did see kn advantage to slower
speeds.
4r. TngeIbrecht said that he had a problem with dual side
parking on a street that Is narrow. He said that he doesn't
understand why it Is neces:aty to build a street with park-
Inc on both sides He sold the only advantage would be to
slow down the speed of drivers.
I
Ms, klker stated that Mr. Slua rt made reference to speeding
and she felt it would not make a difference but atreed that
some consistency should be shown with both streets. She
added that she felt parking should be on only one side of
the street.
4s, Stock stated that consistency was hard to maintain with
a school in the area.
Mr, Svehlo commented that one tree on Avenue G would have to
be removed,
Mr. Cochran stated that consistency is not in packing but In
whether the street should be one way to two ways.
Dixie Stevenson, 1920 N. Oak, stated that the speed Is bad
now and she felt that if the speed limit was lowered to 20
mph it would help. She said that she wanted to keep the
existing footprint Ms. Stevenson added that the exit for
Oak Street tra■ 1-IS does not lead to Oak Street,
He. Riker asked if the city could have lanes from 1•35 lead '
to Oak when exited from 1.3S and lines that would also teed
to Hickory Street when exited, Mr. Svehla sold yes, a sign
on 1.75 states the, the Oak Street exit will take you
downtown.
Ma. Brock moved to recommend approval to tAe City Comas ll
that the policy statement be attached to the Thoroughfare
Plan. Motion died for lack of a second.
j A woman from the audience stated that she has lived In
Denton for 70 years and feels there should be two way
traffic all the way through an Oak and Hickory Streets.
Ms. grock stated that possibly in the future the Commission
could consider it.
I
'Ir. Holt stated that In order to widen Oak Street, between
Miller good and Donnie Brae, the trees would have to stay
and the City would have to widen the south aide of Oak
Street.
Mr. Srehis mated that it was a possibtlitr Alt It would
have to be taken to City Council,
Mr. Halt asked that if the Commission voted on the lost
motion, the It City Council would still make the final
decLoton. Mr. Robbins said yes.
Mr. Holt stated that Hickory Street did not bother him, it
was Oak street bein three to four feet off a front yard
that would change Re looks of the bees,
Mr. fnsolbrecht moved to recommend approval of the policy
statement with b change In item g1, to reads
on k one tide, and
31 Hickory addition
Streets should trivet be allowed parking
Hi
I I
f
S
T
V
9
p9. ~unutes s
Suva mb er SU, Ip4s
page 9
Seconded by Mr. Holt,
There was a conflict in the audience and people present
butt fellh thet Commission 1 vase uota listening toy thelrl velwrut
points,
Ms. Brock stated that she requested that those who lived in
the area be pr a,ent In order for the Cammisslon to receive
Information from those that lived in the area. She spot-
allred for gbvlap the wrong impression, but said that the
Commission needed to decide what was best for the City, as u
whole, as well,
Hr, Holt stated that he was worried about the extension on
the southslde. He said he would rather keep the area "as
ki" with parking on on side than both sides with the road
exte n ded s outh side.
Ms. Brock stated that it the Commission made a recommenda-
tion to the City Council to have pparkin on one side of the
street there would be parking Problems to the future.
Mr, Glasscock stated that he felt parking would be better on
one side of the sheet. He sold that he was In favor of the
motion an the floor.
Hr. Ylolt withdrew his second to the Motion to recommend
acceptance of the policy statement with the eorrection in
Item IS.
Mr, Glasscock seconded Mr. fngelbrecht's motion with the
change in item 17.
sides would
Ms.
slowBrock
down trtIricthat
and would encourage liking.
parking
j Mr. kaaman asked if the Commission could recammend
j an one side for certain hours only. Hr, Robbins sold yes,
though the City Council would make the final derision.
(S-/).caMs. Morlan,'Mr.t1101t, MS. stock, and Hr. liamman
' i voted no.
Hr, Svehlo stated that It would go to City Coun[ll without it
recommendation from the Commission if needed.
Ms, Brock moved to recommend approval of the policy state'
ment oes crilivally stated and to have it attached to the
earrSe0hl6r1lviaMt• fnjelbto dby voted roan and motion . ht V, Director's Report
Hr. Robbins asked to pass on his report.
Meeting adJourned 1115 p.m.
telta
r
r~
i
P6: Minutes
October ;o, 19ie
Page 7
the staff has also provided the Commission with InEcr-
matlon in conjunction with an earlier toning request.
The research indicates that there was a fire at one plant
that resulted in an evacuation.
RkBUTIAL: Mr. Jester Jr. stated Safety-kleen has not had
anY sp is and there were no employees that were cod- J
plalning of breathing problems. He said that they have ll
not stated whether they would condemn the water well or
not.
Chair declared public herring closed.
DECISION: Mr. Glasscock stated that he .nderstood that
ih expanslon would be for just a warehouse and no
chemicals would are recycled in the new portion.
Mr. Glasscock moved to receamend approval of Z-88-020
with the condition stated by staff. Seconded by I
Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (6.0) for
- approval.
IV. Consider making a recommendation on Article 17, Signs, of
Appendix b, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances.
moved Mr. Holt t table c
ordinanceuntiltheNovember90 1989.01eting. trSeconded by
Ms. Riker and unanimously carried (6-0).
Y. Consider an amendment to the Denton Development Plan to add a
note on the Thoroughfare Plan about the widths and parking on
Oak and nickory Streets.
STAFF KLFORFt Mr. lobbins stated that the :angora a In the J
memo a was on the Commissioner's desks were di~ferent from
what they received in their packets. He stated that, on the
new memo, deleted words were tressed out and additional words
1 were underlined.
Mr, lobbies stated that at the time that the packets were
posed out to the Commissioner's, he was not aware of the
three travel lanes of traffic on cart of Hickory Street. He
said that vas the most substantlat change from the document 1
that was in the Commissioner's packets.
Mr. Robbins said that staff was recommending approval of the
amendment to protect the historic district along Oak and
Hickory Streets as well as other notes outside the district.
Mr. Clark added that the area was not affected by the CIP
project.
Mr. Robbins stated that to clarify Mr, Clark's statement, the
area between Notch Street and South Carroll Boulevard is not
part of the construction activity in the City's CIP project,
Ha said that it was in the tree that the policy wcutd apply.
The policy would apply to Hickory and Oak Streets between
bonnie brae and Carroll Boulevard, '
Mr. Holt asked if this area of the street would not be paved,
I Mr. Clark said that the only appart affected by the CIP pro-
joct, f CarrollnBothe ulevardoandaWelcheStreet,s Hon Oak ickorySStreetbebetween
Carroll Boulevard end welch Street Is not affected.
Mr. Glasscock asked if there was parking on both sides of Oak
Street. Mr. Clark said that it rules with the location.
Mr. Holt asked what wider than the footprint was.
Mr. Robbins stated that if the polley is ■dopted, the
footprints would be wider where libeled "vtder" than the
existing footprint to accommodate what was said at an earlier
meeting,
Mr. Holt stated that the Commission's recommendation was to
keep the existing footprint.
1 , _.y r
F t
5
Vs: Minutes
J<taorr 20, lvtli
Pagc tl
Mr. Robbins said that there would be a problem itbuilt
actordin to the policy, there are liability issues asso-
ciated w1th building a substandard street to allow on-street
parking and the two travel lanes, he said that staff would
not recommend to do something that Which the city may have
some liability.
Mr. Holt asked if there was a liability if nothing was done.
Mr. Robbins said ne did not think so.
Ms, glker stated that maybe the Commission should table the
request or make a notion since the conversation was going in
cireles.
Mr. Holt asked It the Commission could postpone the discus-
sion until the next meeting. The Commission agreed.
V1. Director Report.
Meeting adjourned at 6105 p.m,
I
E,
i i
I
I
i
J/
v~: ":h,tet
September 19o
Fags 3
Greg Rlch, Paul Onricker Company, 8700 Stemmons Gallas,
stated tnat the purpose of the rezoning is to maintain the
integrity of the neighborhood so that small lots will not
be located across from Large lots,
Cnair declared public hearing closed,
Ms. Brock stated that sometimes people who aren't involved
In development don't real Ite that there are opportunities
to actually improve developments ind make them less dense,
DECISION; Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
FTFM , Seconded by Mr. kmmman and unanimously carried
(6.0).
IV. Considerations
A. Consider a plan to remove protected trees along Hickory
and Oak streets in c~njunctlon with street improvements.
STAFF REPORT: Mr, Svehla stated that a neighborhood meet-
741 was herd to receive input and guidance. There were a
{ substantial number of people concerned with the trees. The
Tree Preserv/t Ian Ordinance requires that the Commission
consider any trees that will be affected by CIP projects.
If the street Is widened into a 37 foot section, seven
trees will need to be removed and passlbly another three
would be adversely affected. looking at Oak Street from a
traffic standpoint, ultinItaly three lanes of traffic will
be needed, This is consistent with the Development Plan;
however, the people who live on Oak Street do not want it
changed. Staff recommends that Oak Street be widened to a
37 foot section with two lanes for one way traffic and two
way traffic west of Avenue C. The alternative is to leave
the street in Its existin Conti uration asespoused by the
neighbors. A few trees ■lsht still be effected by the
Improvements anyway.
Ms. Brock asked if a new curb and gutter will be installed.
Mr. Svehla said yet. There are dralnage problems and new
pipes will be needed. Exiltint facilities are in poor
condition. As much repair work as possible will be done
working around the trees.
Ms. Brock asked how the drainage improvements will be
effected it the street, retains It present configuration
of varying widths,
Mr. Svehla said that the job would not be mailer It the
street widths are not changed. Normally lateral movements
are not much at a problem but it will be more difficult to
metcn up with the driveways. ,
Ms, Brock stated that there has been a lot at discussion
about the ultimate plans for Oak Street.
Mr. Svehla said that the existing widths will be too narrow
f In places to create the ultimate cupletl,
{
Ms, stock asked what would be the maximum load for Oak and
Hickory Streets under the transportation plan,
Mr. Svehla said that, It 1a hard to determine, they are
now used is main roueo in and out of The University of
North Texas, there is no way to predict what load they
will actually be carryin in a few year! but the University
expects to grow and daveoppeent is expected it the welt end
f of Oak Streit, the transportation plan shows Oak and
Hickory is the main rr to to this development area west of t
1.33 and to the University,
Ms. Brock & tied what the streets could potentially carry if
designed as a cuplet.
1
k
r
`linutes
se jtember :a~ I~NB
Yag! i
Mr. Svehla stated that two lanes can carry 22,UW to :J ,0C0
vehicles, three lanes can carry 24,000 to 33,000, tae
oneway cuplets are mote efticIenIt .
sir. Holt asked the goal of the presentation to the
f Commission.
Mr. Svehla stated that the tree preservation ordinance
states that the Commission must determine whether cat not
protected trees are being unnecessavlly removed In
conjunction with CiP projects,
Mr. Holt asked what kind of trees are proposed For remevaI.
Mr. Svehla said at least three oak trees. Two of which are
in the historic district.
Mr. Holt stated that if a 37 foot street section is
App I traffic done- wa Y. possibility
asked l wneie opened people would parks of I the t
Mr. Svehla stated that no one has suggested changing the
traffic pattern. The City would have the option of doing
so in later years If desired. He sold that the Historic
Landmark Commission and the City Council will also be
considering this request.
l Ms, brock stated that this is the third meeting on the
issue that she has attended, The first was a work session
with the Council when the 37 feet were agreed upon. The
second was the meeting with the neighborhood, She said
that at the last Council meeting, it was suggested that it
transportation committee be formed. This project is very
much a transportation issue, Enrollment at the University
of Forth Teass is growing. This lay mean that larger
streets are needed. Ms. Brock stated that she Is going to
recommend that staff be directed to prepare a policy to be
attached to the Thoroughfare Plan stating that Oak and
Hickory retain the existing traffic pattern and any changes
would require public hearin`s. The neighborhood needs this
protection. The historic district Is new and no parking
with high speed traffic would be a detriment, She said
that she is also concerned about the University and that
sometime in the near future the City needs to work with the
University officials about access, bike paths, the safety
of students, etc. She said that she does not think that
having Oak and Hickory as major thoroughfares is necessary
to the development of the high intensity area west of town.
George Stewart, 2005 W. Oak, stated that he is ppresident of
the propperty owners association between Avenue C and BOnnle
Brae. He sold that he agrees with Ms. Brock and endorses
her proposal.
Mike Cochran, 609 N. Oak, stated that he also agreed with
Ms, Brock's statements. He stated that the issue is bigger
than the trees but he appreciates the staff's concern for
tree preservation. He said that a boulevard through the
historic district is not good for Denton even though It may
make sense fo traffic engineering. He said that the Histor-
} It Landmark Commission voted to oppose the widening of oak
Street and recommends that Oak and Hickory have two way
traffic. This recommendation should be seriously consid-
ered. The cost would not be great and would preserve the
nei``hborhood. He urged that Oak Street at least remain as
it lS. Illdenin the street to $1 feet would be a disaster
because it woull become too easy to make the street three
lanes one way. The residents would have no sound arguments
against it other thin emotional reasons,
f
1
i
k h,
r
i
i
r
i PS. siinutes
' ;eptember :5, 1994
Page 6
I
Murray Ricks, '05 w. Oak, stated that he lived on Stanley
Street prior to moving to Oak Street. khen the drainage
was upgraded on Stanley and Thomas streets, pipe was put In
the middle of the street and curb a„d gutter was removed as
needed. T'he home owners lawns and trees were undisturbed.
The existing footprint of the street was left in tact.
I Mr, Ricks suggested doing this type of tmprcveeent on Oak
Street as an alternative to the current proposal. Drop
inlets could be installed as necessary but r.he main pipes
could be down the center of the road,
Mr. Svehla stated that the bond issue voted on by the
citizens requires that Oak Street be rebuilt. s0 - 90
percent of Oak Street is in poor condition. It may be
possible to save some of the curb but the streut Is buckled
and needs to be rebuilt. Mr. Svehla state! that he would
not feel comfortable recommending that the street only be
repaved. If the curbs are in good enough shape, the City
will leave them in piece. The ma Drily of the curbs are in
bad shape and will need to be replaced to facilitate better
drainage.
Ms. Brack stated that If Oak Street is left at Its existing
width, It will have to h. down graded to a collector street
1 on the thoroughfare plan,
Mr. Svehla stated that when a transportation committee Is
appointed, that issued could be considered.
Joyce Palmer, 1905 W. Oak, stated that she Is disturbed 1
that the City is not taking the residents who live on the 1111,
street into account. Improving the capacity of Oak Street
will seriously effect the quality of life. She said that
University Drive and Eagle art better suited for carrying
large traffic loads. Extra traffic on Oak Street would
effect all the residents of the historic district and the
surrounding neighborhood adversely,
Pete Gunter, 221 Jagoe, stated that his family Is from
Gainesville which has a historic district. Their district
is an attraction to people and enhances the clty for the
residents. It attracts business as well. The Denton
historic district is smaller thin Gainesville's and if a
freeway is run through It, it will be worthless. If
Denton's airport and the surrounding area are developped,
people will not hg off the pplanes and rush down Hickoryy
Street to get to the Mlnl-Ma11. The rtlytoric district Is
somethin of value and should be preserved for at least
another ~#cad*,
Ms. Morgan stated that she is in favor of preserving the
historic district as is, except for necessary repairs.
Mr. Svehlo stated that portions of Oak and Hickory Streets
are IS feet wide. He asked If the Commission would like
these sections narrowed down to 17 feet or left to the
4 existing width, 77 foot would still leave room for a
parking lane, He said that Pry Street will only be rebuilt
between Oak and Hickory Streets.
DECISIONi Mr. Holt moved that no trees be removed from Oak
and'-ATtTiory streets.
Mr. Glasscock sold that there ire some dead trees in the
k rltht-of-way that should be removed, He asked if the
sidewalks will be redone,
Mr. Svehla said yes and that the dead trees would be i
removed. He pointed out that there are few living trees
that may be affected by the Improvements even if the
existing footprint of the street is followed. It de ends t
on the root systems of the trees. Staff olll consult with
John Cooper, the County Agri:ulture Extension Officer,
about the trees,
a
}i- M10'IieS
September 29, lysd
Page 7
Laapnnd tion was seconded by Mr, aamman and unanimously carried
.0).
, Brock moved that staff prepare a policy statement that
es Oak Street wilt have no more than two lanes of traffic
us parking, with the traffic pattern to remain as it Is,
no parking will be removed in any area. This policy
uld be attached to the thorough Fare plan In the Denton
velopment Plan, Seconded by Mr. Holt and unanimously
rried (6.0),
B. Make a recommendation on preliminary replat of Lots 1.23
to Lots 1A-16R and Lots 42.43 to Lots 42R-51R, Block A.
The koodlands of Township II,
STAFF REPORT; Ms, Evans stated that the preliminary replat
61-Lots 1.23 to Lots 1R-16R and Lots 42.45 to Lots 42R-5IR,
Block A, The Woodlands of Township 11, is being done in
cnnjunctlon with the toning case heard earlier in the
evening. The property is toned PD-6 and single-family
development is anticipated,
DECISION! Mr. lawman moved to recommend appproval of the l
pre m nary replat of Lots 1.23 to Lots IR•16k and Lott I
42.43 to Lots 42A-SIR, Block A, The Woodlands of Townshipp
II. Seconded by Ms. Morgan and unanimously carried (6.0),
C, Make a recommendation on proposed fee for downtoaing of
non-residential toning districts where residential uses
exist,
STAFF REPORT: Ms, Evans Stated that she had Informed the
oam ss ono few meetings ago that the City proposed a
system to initiate downtoning in some areas. The
Commission needs to look at Some existing land uses that
are currently toned for higher Intensity uses, Under the
cumnalative toning law, residential structures in nonresi-
dential districts will not be allowed to rebuild If over So
percent of the structure Is destroyed and they also cannot
do additions, The Commission might want to consider a
redaction of one-half of the current fees of (600,00 for
fire acres or less and 11,100 for more than five acres,
other options are to have no fee at all or to have no fee
for downtoning properties In the non-cummalative toning
district and then one-half or some other fee for properties
that are general downtoning cases from one residential use
to another. Staff recommends the option of one-half of
current fees, Ms. Evans stated that there are propertyy
owners from Southrldge currently toned for nonresldentlal
uses present at the meeting. The existin land use is
two•faelly and the property Is deed restricted for resi-
dentisl uses, She stated the cuemalative/non•cuemalative
ordinance becomes effnetive January 1919 to prevent build-
ing new residential units in a non-residential district,
The ordinance was spssrcved because there was a problen with
people building multlfamily units In Industeiai districts,
These uses were unanticipated and the Infrastructure was
not In Place. Several residents of the neighborhood could
bring In a request together and split the fees,
Mr. Holt asked if downsonint would solve the problem of
the people being able to add on or rebuild it necessary,
Ms. Evans Sold yes,
Mr. Holt asked if the peopple will have to go through the
regular toning process, Ms. Evans said yes,
Fred Vaughan, 300 Molly Hill, stated that the development
he resides In was approved l6 years ago, The City has now t
placed restrictions on the property that ace unfair to the
residents. The residents should not be asked to correct
somethin that is not their fault. the property Is now
unsellsb~a.
J
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
December 12, 1988
The regular meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission was
held on Monday, December 12, 1988 at 4;00 p.m,, in the Civil
Defense Room of the Municipal Building, Denton, Texas.
Present: William Barker, Mike Cochran, Bullitt Lowry, Tom
Miller,and Janet Shelton
Absent; Judith Abbott, Catherine Conrady, Gaylen Fickey,
Richard Hayes, and William Hansbury
Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for
Planning and Development; Elizabeth Evans, Planning
Administrator; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney;
and Olivia Carson, Secretary
4
Chairman Cochran called the meeting to order,
i, Minutes I
j Mr. Miller suggested that. staff check on the boundaries
of the East Denton neighborhood to be sure the minutes
are accurate.
Mr. W wry stated that the motion on page 6 I
is worded awkwardly. He said the motion shouldrread p "Mr. I
Lowry moved to recommend Mr, Hayas's suggestion that Oak
Street not be widened. Similarly, Hickory should not be
widened between Carroll and Welch and Hickory should be
changed to no morn than two travel lanes and two
on-street parking lanes."
Ms. Shelton stated that pa 8a 71 paragraph 2 says that she
left the meeting. She said thapt she did not leave and
participated
thee vote (7-0) Fain
paragraph 3, page 7,
Mr, Robbins stated that he would
recommendation to Planning and Zoning that wasybased the
Mr. Lowry's motion,
The Commission decided to proceed with another item as
people were present ;o discuss it and come back to the
discussion on this recommendation later in the meeting,
I
• I
I
r
1
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
December 12, 1988
r
Page 2
After discussing the possible renaming of Pockrus Road,
the Commission agreed to resume their discussion on the
Oak/Hickory Street recommendation and minutes. Mr.
Robbins presented them with a copy of the recommendation
that staff presented to the Planning and Zoning
Commission based on their motion at the November 14, 1988 J
meeting. li
Mr. Lowry stated that item 1 of the recommendation was
accurate but item 2 could be phrased to more accurately
reflect the desires of the Historic Landmark Commission.
He said that item 2 of the recommendation should read as
follows:
I
Hickory Street from Carroll Boulevard to Welch Street
should not be widened. It should be changed to allow
two travel lanes and on-street parking on both sides
of Hickory Street or bike lanes from Carroll to
Welch. Hickory Street from Welch to Bonnie Brae
should be no wider than allowing two travel lanes and
iI on-street parking or bike lanes. ,
Mr. Lowry said that the Commission's intent is to
discourage traffic on these streets. i
Mr. Cochran stated that according to Jerry Clark, the
City Engineer, making traffic two-way will not affect the
amount of traffic on the streets, but it will have an 4
Impact on the intersection at Carroll Blvd,
Mr. Miller said that two-way traffic seems to go slower
than one-way traffic.
Mr. Robbins stated that staff has interpreted the motion
that the Commission made on making Oak and Hickory
two-way traffic as a recommendation that the possibility
of two-way traffic on those streets be studied. Staff
will let the Council know that the Commission wants the
idea studied. A consultant will probably be hired to do i
the study but not until after the policy for the streets
has been adopted and a decision made on the
reconstruction of the streets.
Mr. Morris arrived at the meeting.
Mr, Lowry stated that he would like the way he reworded
the staff recommendation to the Planning and Zoning
Commission to be substituted as the wording for the
motion on page 6, paragraph 12, He moved acceptance of
the minutes of the regular meeting of November 14, 1988
as amended. Seconded by Ms. Shelton and unanimously
carried (S-0).
i ,
a
I
i
HLC Minutes
b November 14, 1988
Page 5
Ik
Ms, Ross pointed out that the lot at 1112 East Sycamore is in
the flood plain. Federal funds for the renovation of the
house would not be available unless it is moved. The lot is
also slated to become part of a new park,
Mr. Ellison said that demolition could be delayed on the house.
Ms. Evans stated that someone could buy the house privately at
a foreclosure sale.
Ms. Moore stated that the Parks Department is interested in
the lot itself.
Mr, Ellison stated that the citizens need to be informed that
the demolition will at least be delayed. They may want to
help.
j Ms. Shelton said that there are other older houses in the area.
Ms, Moore said that the vacant houses have vagrants living n
them, They often start fires in the winter and the neighbors
are concerned.
Mr. Miller moved that the Commission look at the 10 houses
slated for demolition prior to the next meeting. Seconded by
Mr. Lowry and unanimously carried (8.0).
Mr. Lowry asked that the chairman be sent a list of the
buildings and informed of the motion.
Ms, Rosss Mr, Doyle, Mr, Ellison, and No. Moore left the meeting.
11. Dlscuss and consider the Oak and Hickory Street o)eect
Mr, Hayes stated that his is concerned about limiting on-street
parking for multi-family developments, That is where it is
probably most needed, He also said that Hickory Street from
Carroll Boulevard to Welch Street should not be widened. No
more than two lanes of traffic and two lanes of on-street
ppirking should be allowed. He sold that Oak Street should not
be widened at all.
Mr, Hayes left the meeting.
The Commission considered plans for rebuilding Oak Street,
Ms. Evans asked if the residents want parking on both sides of
the street. The Issue was not addressed at the neighborhood
meetin`. Mo. Abbott said that she would like to see two lanes
of traffic and one parking lane,
Mr. Lowry asked why the site of the lanes have increased from
the pprevious proposel. Mr. Clark stated that the memo In the
Commiosion's 6acfc-up woo prepared by someone else.
i
r~
1
HLC Minutes
November LS, 1988
Page 6 DRAFT
Ms. Evans stated that 12 feet is the ideal size for a travel 1
lane.
Mr. Barker stated that the footprint of Oak Street should not
be changed.
Mr. Clark stated that the traffic movements on Oak Street have
betn watched. Changing the curbs will not allow someone to go
faster, but will hopefully prevent some accidents. A 12 foot
lane includes a foot and one-half of gutter. People don't
drive in them. They will park in them,
Mr. Barker asked the speed limit on Oak Street. Mr. Clark
said 30 miles per hour.
Mr. Barker said that there are no speed limit signs.
Mr. Lowry stated that he is concerned about changing the.
1
connection between the Historic District and the rest of the
project. He said that Oak Street should not be widened
between Carroll and Bonnie Brae.
Ms. Abbott stated that Guttering is needed along Oak near
Avenue G.
Mr. Lowry moved to recommend that Oak Street should not be
' widened between Bonnie Brae and Carroll except for guttering
at the intersection with Avenue G. Motion died for lack of
second.
Mr. Clark stated that the plan for Oak Street through the
Historic District calla for the elimination of the existing
Jog and a small widening of the intersections to is rove the
turning radius. The hump will be taken out of the Inter-
section at Mounts Street, No trees will be removed. the
sidewalks will not be upgraded.
Mr. Lowry stated that he does not want traffic to go any
faster through the area,
Mr. Clark said that the drive is unsafe if a car stops in
front of another one. The turning radii are not a major
problem but the City would like to widen then to a common,
standard slim.
a
Mr. Lowry moved to recommend Mr. Hayes's suggestion that Oak
j Street not be widened nor Hickory between Carroll and Belch
and that would be changed to no more than two travel lanes and
two on-street prrkin lanes. Seconded by Ms. Shelton and
unanimously carried 17.0),
k
Mr. Clark stated that Hickory between Welch and Carroll will
not be redone because it was not part of the bond election,
I
J '
U C Minutes
November 14, 1988
P o g o 7
A F T
Mr. Barker emphasized that the new curb radii were not to be
approved.
Ms. Shelton and Mr. Clark left the rjeeting.
Mr. Miller stated that traffic people naturally have the urge
to widen lanes.
Mr. Lowry clarified that curb excavation wo+ild be over the
current footprint and the motion was meant to retain the
current width. He said that the motion was meant for the
entirety of Oak Street.
IV. Consider recommending support for the Jones Farm concept.
Mr. Lowry stated that there will be a tour of the Jones Farm
on November 30, 1988. ;.;r. Cochran can be contacted for more
details. Senator Glassgow has come out in favor of Jones
Farm. A motion of support from the Commission would be
helpful. The Jones Fare is located within the Lake Ray
Roberts area, It is a working fare on a historical and
archeologically significant site, The Texas Department of
Parks and wildlife wants to fund a living farm. This is one
of the sites being considered. Numerous
Inter-
ested in the project. He moved that the Commission support
the concept and recommend pursuing It further. Seconded b
Mr. Miller and unanimously carried (6-0), y
V. New Business
M
s. Evans stated that a petition has been received to change
the
wouldalikeftoohavesaRoad,
special She
meeting to the
consideriadditional
agenda items.
Mr. Lowry suggested beginning the December meeting at an
earlier time.
The Commission agreed on the suggestion, No, Evans sold that
she would send a notice asking the Commissioners to arrange
their schedule so that'attendance would be possible,
Meeting adjourned at 6i20,
I
~h
1579x
i
r~
I
t
1
1
~~ioute~
hlSl0CIC td nu ei ate 6V4, wI sal-uu
Jeplrt' b er 1tbeb
tae leguIdr t,ee tlnk cat tine historic Ia riOni Cu m 1, is Qr, cat tif e Cltl
oI Len ton, lexas, was held can Septem, et 1.1 lwab, at 5:UU p.0, Yn II
tie uIviI Leterise huum of the Municipai LultdLng, 1
Present: ~udItn Aobott, MI IIlam barker, F,1ke Cochran,
a therthe Conrady, Gaylen FIckey, Itlcnard h.yes,
BuIIttt Lowry, Tom Miller, anu Janet Shelton
Absent: kkIt lam Hanscury
P r e s t n t from Staff; Elizabetn Evans, Planning AumInIstrator;
Joe F1urr15, Assistant City Attorney; Jerry ClarK,
City Engineer; and Olivia Carson, Secretary
I
r:hatrman mike Cochran called the meeting to Order,
f. New business
oaslderation of proposal to widen Oak and hickory streets
and remove protected trees
Mr. Clark stated that tiro City is still in the da a atharIt,
s uku. Frel.minary drawings have been done and the It tIf
Council hau expressed its approval. The prr,Ject involves
Oas Streat Detwson Carroll and bonnie Brae, Hickory Street
between kelch and Bounce Brae, and Fry Street between Oak
and Scripture. The Engineering Ltpartrant is aware of the
Historic District, There are a lot of issues In relation to
trees. The Engineering epartment is planning for the least
effect on the envlrontenDt. The City Council supports widen-
Ing Oak Street to 37 feet with an 11 toot travel lane and an
I sight foot parking lane, The existing configuration will not
be changed. The flow of traffic will contlnue In the same
way as currently. It the street is made any narrower then It
would be hard to travel through, The ':onmission's suggestions
are welcome. Red line drawings are available for review In
the Engineering Department. flidening the street to 37 feet
will require the removal of some trees but the street will be
weaved wherever possible,
Mr. Miller asked the objective of the widening.
Mr. Clark said that tr,e streets have deteriorated and were
approved in a bond election to be upgraded,
Mr. Miller asked why Oak is being widened.
Mr. Clark said that it is an inconsistent width and widening
It willugive the City the option of making it three lane In
the fure,
Hr. Lowry asked It there is a possibility of making Oak and
Hickory two-way in order to discourage traffic. He asked
1 about lettln bills, Unlveralty, and Scripture/Congress carry
the traftlc toads.
Mr. Clerk said that he is willing to consi:ar the possibility,
There would be the same need to widen Scripture,
Mr, Hayes awed when the street study was done,
i
Mr. Clark said that street studies are an on•going process,
The staff rates the streets for the amount of deterioration,
He said that an original thoroughfare study was dine In 1981,
i
S
4
HLC Minutes
September 12, 19 as
Page 2
Ine Land Use Planning Committee changed
in 1986. Th the thoroughfare Plan
by the L UPC. project is consistent with the approved plan
.
Mr, Cochran asked the cost of repaving.
Mr. Clark said 53.5 per square foot, $IS if curbs and gutters
re included. t also costs a lot to remove the ol
a d street.
the bond election called for the streets to be rebuilt.
.r. Hayes stated tnat he was a member of the LUPC and he
always understood that Oak and Hickory were to remain in
their present condition.
Ms. Abbott asked if Fry would be widened.
Mr. Clark said no.
Ms. Shelton asked if tnere are plans to widen Bonnie Brae,
Hr. Clark said yes,
Mr. Fickey asked if the traffic on University has decreased
in the last few years,
Mr. Clark said that it has increased.
Mr. Fickey asked if the lights will eventually be '
synchronized.
beinglcomputerized, It is a complicated project and is
Mr, Cochran said that synchronizing the lights on University
should help take traffic off Oak Street, He asked if there
has been any indication of a need to go to three one-way
lanes on Oak and Hickory streets.
Mr. Clark said no. The new pavement will last 20.25
The Commission Is welcome to look at the preliminary drawings.
There will be a discussion of the project at the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting on September 14, 1988.
Mr, Barker asked if the Council had to approve the project.
Mr. Cochran stated that the Council has already approved the
widehIng to 37 feet.
Mr. Lowry moved that the Historic Landmark Commission
Authoriza the Chairmen tot 1) remind the Planning and
Commission end
regarding the y OaConcil k-HickoryaHistoriceDistricty
have previously coma before the HLC, 2) the HLC strongly
recommends that no widening be done west of Avenue C, and
He sthe aid H these recommends actions Oak and
historic district as previously approved. Seconded by
1 Ms. Conrady.
Mr. Cochran said that the Commission should have been
notified of the proposal earlier.
Mr. Lowry stated that he had discussed the bond Issue with
the council members and they had said no widening would be
done.
Mr. aboutethetwidthtoftthe streetsprof Whether theymotion two-way
or not could be considered later, I
I ~
9
i
y
5
s
t
H((, flinutcs
September 11, lvBg
Page 3
Mr. Hayes stated that being two-way would slow the traffic
down and make it safer and more convenient for the residents.
Mr. Cochran said that repaving alone would increase the speed
of traffic on the street.
Ms. Abbott stated that Increasing traffic will be a detriment
to the district. Cutting down trees will not be an improve-
ment. The property values and quality of life in the district
will be adversely affected.
Roll call vote:
Ms. Abbott - aye
Mr. Barker - aye
Mr. Cochran - aye
?Is. Conrady - aye
Mr. Fickey - aye
Mr. Hayes - aye
Mr. Lowry - aye
Mr, M i I I e r - aye
Ms. Shelton - aye
Motion carried unanimously (9.0).
Mr. Hayes asked if the Commission could be advised of
anything affecting the historic district.
Mr. Cochran said that the Commission should also be advised
of impending demolitJons. He said that he had heard tnat the ,
Chamber of Commerce is also against the widening of Oak Street
because it is a needless expense. The Issue gill also be
addressed by the Denton Historical Society, Denton County
{ storical Commission, and Beautification Task Force agendas.
II. Minutes
Ms. Abbott stated that page 3, paragraph 10 should read
11 ..the Main Building at TWU 1s worth noting". She said
j that page S, parsIIraph I should read "The house on Scripture
may be bought by It. David's Church and might be scheduled
for eventual demolition. In the past, Grace Temple wanted ,
to buy the house on the northeast corner of Fulton, Oak, and
Gregg with the idea..." She also said that page 6, pars-
gwh Ishuld read "Ms. Abbott speculated that the church
g reasonably plan to eventual y build a sanctuary...
Mr. Miller stated that pafe 6, paragraph 2 should read
..the fraternity wouldn t remove the second floor room
from the porch because..,"
Ms. Conrady stated that page 6, paragraph IS should read
"The Commission needs an ordinance controlling deaolitions".
She also said that page 7, paragraph 11 should read "historic
districts should be ateas that inspire pride, not mediocrity
It was moved by Mr. Hayes and seconded by Ms. Shelton to
approve the minutes of August I, 1988, as corrected. Motion
p carried unanimously (9-0).
III. Discussion of Certified Local Government Program with
j Dwayne Jones, Preservation Planner, Texas Historical
Commission
Mr. Jones stated that the Certified Local Government Program
was created by the Park Service to help states fund preserva-
tion activities. Texas began its program In ISIS. Beaumont
was the first town to be certified. Corpus Christi is the
f latest. Every state has options about the creation of its
pro rat. Texas has now made counties eligible for certifl-
catlon. The State office must pass on 10 percent of the
i
A
1
384
City of :enton city council Minutes
Meeting of Novemoer 4, 19d6
Page Seventeen
SECTION 1.
November Council of the City of Denton hereby declares Tuesday,
l01 1900 to be Mayors' D- Day in
City of Denton, Texas. t wet an Drugs in cne
,
SECTION iI,
That the Cltltens of the City of Denton, Texas participate
in our 9041 of r drug-free City and a drug-free Amarlca,
SECTION III.
That this cesoIution shall became effective i.~rmediately
uPon its passage And approval.
PASSED ANU APPROVED this the 4th day of Novemoer, i9da,
PAY JTEPNth5, MAYOR
CI1Y Or DENTOh, TEXAN
ATTEST:
i
L~f' f A.,LeN, C Y St c.Rtl n~
CITY Of DENTIN, TEXAS I
APPROVED AS TU LEGAL fuRMj
DEBRA ADAMI DAAYOVITCH
CITY OY DE%%r# CITY ATTGRNEY
, 1ERAa
BYs
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- .e Cher motion, Alford second that the eseolution be approved, un coil
Call vote, McAdams 'aye,' Alexander 'aye,' Hupklna 'aYs,' Alford
unanimouslhQV y 'aye,' and mayor aeePhene 'aye,' Motion carried
7. The Council received a report on the following miscel-
laneous matters (tom the City manager. 1
City Manages Lloyd Harrell reported that tcanppspottation would oe JI
f8114 1eonfNOVember!i. MThose intoreats0 i h ouldlmi t9inatAiacivic Center patking lot at 7800 a.m. And the group would return to Denton
around i:70 P.M.
tout p0441OW dates had Olen Offered by the City's auditors for 4
tax seainac, The Council decided on Tuesday# November 15th at
9130 P.M. in the City Council Chambers.
Harrell concluded by reported that at the close the the City's
financial books, the general revanuea exceeded ONPanditurea by
approximately $1960000
.
Now business
No items Of new business were suggaated by Council Membecs
for future agendas,
fff
The Council than considered agenda item 91 which had bean oelayed
F due to time consttalnte.
7. The Council considered giving staff dit4etion cegacdlnq
eslglnsering work on the Oak•Sickory strait improvement project,
I i
tied oo delayed until after January I pat r CitybMana er Lloyd hatca l re orted that the Hickory Street Design
Other projects would to started in the Interimdun CThe a design u element
j
F
t
-1ty of :entCn Citz Council Mxn'.tes 3 85
Meeting of 'November 4, 1981
page E/gnteen
spoke to two sudjectsr one vas the long range transportation plan
!or the City,- which would be vi telly important. hickory could to
designed to be or,e-way with couplets with one site left Cor an
street parking or it could be left two-way with no parking. Stall
was presenting four alternatives;
I. a width of 37 feat with 3 lanes ore-way (representing
a savings of $70,0001
2. a width of 37 to 45 feet with 3 tanes one-way Ana 1
parking on 1 lane (representing a savings of j50,00u)
j
3. a width of 45 feat with 3 lanes one-way with parking
on 1 side (representing a savings of $29,o0u)
4. a width of 45 feet with 2 lanes each way and parking
on both sides (representing no savings)
Statf was recommenaing alternate 43.
crew motion, Alford second to direct staff to proceed with ire
engineering work on the Oak-nLCkory street improvement project with
alternative r4. Motion carried 5 to 1 with Council MemLe[ ,MCAoams
ing the 'nay' vote.
9. So oftlcial action on wx*CLCivv session items of Legit
matters, real atate, personnel and/or board appointments was t4a.n.
UJ. the Council convened Lnta the Ekecuttve session to aiicw4s
legal matters, real estate, personnel Ana/or board appointments. ;.o
official action was taken.
1 ;
With no further itees of business, the meeting was adjourned. 1
1
NAY S cbS, M YU
i 41
i N,
4
I
i
i ~
I j
I
i
1
04930
1
j {
1I
1
OAK / HICKORY NN ING ISSUES
EXISTING STREET SECTION ORIGINAL HISIORJC
LOCATION WIDTH RANGE EXISTING USE STAFF PROPOSAL LANDMARK COW PLANNING 6 ZONING C" CPTiONS/EFFECTS TO CONSIDER
1. HICKORY 351 to 45' 35'-45t b/b 2 TR, 371 b/b providing NOT ADORESSEO Not to be widened, 2 TR 371 b/b Eliminates excessive pavements
Watch to I PK Lanes for 2 TR Lanes, and I PK Lanes - However, currently unused as perking Jane
Bonnie Brea I PK Lanes; parking can be deleted In
Portions - 451 Ultimate: 3 TR `CONVERT To front of multi-family or
b/b basically Lanes TWO WAY nonresldentlal property
unused as parking 341 to 361 - 2 TR + I PK
37, - 3 TR
2. OAK 34.251 to 421 Carroll to Ave C 371 b/b providing DON'T WIDEN Carroll to Avenue C "0) 34.25 - 361. 2 TR + f PK
Carroll 34.25' to 361 for 2 TR Lanes, leave footprint Precludes safe widening to 3 TR
to Bonnie 2 TR + I PK I PK Lanes 34.25 to 36 - 2 TR + I PK (2) 371 - 2 TR r I PK; Ultimately could
Brae Ultimate: 3 TR *CONVERT TO be safely widen to 3 TR
} Avenue C to Ave G Lanes TWO WAY Avenue C to Avenue G (1) 411 - 2 TR + 2 PK
361 to 371 - 2 TR + 361 to 371 - 2 TR + I PK with standard lone wldlhs
i PI( or 2 TR + 2 PK or - 2 TR + 2 PK (2) 361 to 371 Remove
I PK Lane - 2 TR + I PK
**(3) 361 to 371 Leave 2 TR + 2 PX
Non Standard Section _
1< Ave 0 to Bonnie 8r Avenue G to Bonnie Brea (1) 171 2 TR - I PK This eliminates
381 to 421 2 TR + 361 to 421 - 2 TR + I PK unneeded/excess pavement;
I PK 3 TR - Ultimate
3. HICKORY 42.4 42.4 Not In Project NOT IN PROJECT Convert south Leave Existing Conflg. Leave as Is, not voted In 1986 Bond Issue
Carroll LIMITS side travel 3 TR Lanes + I PK where Perform preventative maintenance as needed
to Welch lane to park multi-family d non- In next few years (crack seal, overlay or
lane residential (exists on recycle)
*Proposed south side)
configuration
2 TR+2PX
CONVERT TO
1 TWO WAY
TR - Travel
f` PK a Parking
b/b- Bark to Back
i
* To be examined as part of comprehensive review u: the transportation plan,
"Street sections on Oak (above) will not be standard - main Issues to consider
0642E
1
I
1.111+41 ILL='
Ih
F
f
i
i
I
I ~
.
I~
f
r
I
WrYOI DENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DEN TON, TEXAS Ib?Of / TELEPHONE (8 1 7) 568 8307
Office of the City Mansper
M E M O R A N D U M
I
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Roger Nelson, Administrative Assistant
DATE: February 16, 1989
1
SUBJECT: STRFET CLOSINGS
Per City Council's request, I have obtained ordinances and
policies from various Texas municipalities that deal with
street closings. Attached, in their
closing ordinances from Austin. Denton entirety, are street
Richardson's street closing potic Irving, and Hurst;
1
y, and m
j ordinances from Dallas, Garland and Grand Prairie ass gathering
I A summary of all of these documents is also attached. You will
notice that each city deals with this issue in its own unique
j f requirements. while Dallas andeGarboth land haveeordinancesithathare
quite extensive. The only common thread that runs through all
i of these documents is the fact that someone has to approve the
4 street closing.
Austin's ordinance appears to be aimed at those closings
associated with fraternities and sororities. Richardson, Hurst
I and Irving are all geared toward neighborhood block
All three specifically refer to neighborhood block parties. ,
pa
Dallas' ordinance makes a distinction between events ofp75+iand
5004 people. Garland's ordinance applies only to events
expected to attract 1,000+ people.
After further review of the attached ordinances and evaluating
the input received from the city council, I would like to offer
the following suggestions to the City Council for their
consideration:
f 2. The street closing
(30) days in advance of the must start at least thirty
proposed event.
2. All of the residents/occupants of the block to be closed
I must sign the petition before it is presented to the
City Council.
y N
F' e ti:
Y
t
k
Lloyd V. Harrell
February 16. 1989
Page 2
3. The City Council must approve the street closing by
resolution at a regular or called City Council meeting
no less than ten (10) days before the event.
4. Event must terminate in enough time for the street to be
reopened at the :ime set forth in the resolution.
5. A written evaluation of the effect of street closure on
emergency services will be required from the Police
Chief and Fire Chief.
6. The Police Chief will advise the City Council of the
need for a traffic control officer(s). The applicant
will be billed directly for the officers time.
7. A clean up deposit of 15E per linear foot will be
required. The City Manager or his designee will
determine whether or not the area has been adequately
cleaned at the time of the removal of the barricades and
the reopening of the street. This was originally
I suggested for non-residential street closings only.
Council direction concerning which street closings this
` should apply to is requested.
a. A $25 barricade deposit will be required for each
blocked intersection. if Council feels that some of the
costs incurred by the City should be recovered the
deposit could easily be made an administrative fee.
9. Restroom facilities will be required in the following
manner:
2 for up to 100 people
a 4 for 101 to 300 people
7 for 301 to 600 people
1 additional toilet for each 200 people over 600
The applicant may substitute Y permanent toilets for
temporary ones on a one to one basis. Written l1
certification that the toilet will be available to the
general public throughout the event will be required.
it $4I can answer any additional questions, please let me know.
ato r Nelson
!AAministrative Assistant
i' NN:bw
4447M
YS
Attachments
,y
It ~ «
.y .
9•YL'•Qz•` '
i
i
a, i r
,h t
r .
4
ti
t
Lloyd V. Harroll
February 16. 1989
Page 2
3. The City Council must approve the street closing by
resolution at a regular or called City Council meeting
no less than ten (10) days before the event.
4. Event must terminate in enough time for the street to be
reopened at the time set forth in the resolution.
5. A written evaluation of the effect of street closure on
emergency services will be required from the Police
Chief and Fire Chief.
1 6. The Police Chief will advise the City Council of the
need for a traffic control officer(s). The applicant
will be billed directly for the officer's time.
7. A clean up deposit of 15¢ per linear foot will be
required. The City Manager or his designee will
determine whether or not the area has been adequately
cleaned at the time of the removal of the barricades and
the reopening of the street. This was originally
suggested for non-residential street closings only.
Council direction concerning which street closings this
should apply to is requested.
8. A $25 barricade deposit will be required for each
blocked intersection. If Council feels that some of the
costs incurred by the City should be recovered, the
deposit could easily be made an administrative fee.
9. Restroom facilities will be required in the following
manner:
2 for up to 100 people
4 for 101 to '10 people I
7 for 301 t e,0 people
1 additional A let for each 200
people over 600
The applicant may substitute permanent toilets for
temporary ones on a one to one basis. Written
certification that the toilet will be available to the
general public throughout the event will be required.
( if 1 can answer any additional questions, please let me know.
r ~
el s o n
Administrative Assistant
A
RN:bw
4447M I
Attachments
1
I
P i
f
I~
:Approving ; adsinistTet~uelFiling :Felitian/:Srpea of !
:Cily Authority iDepa*tmelt, Involved Fees RequirtmWs1Sotice lDeposils Health lBarri udes',Niscellaneous !
1
, I 11 1 ~ 1
1 1' 'I , , 1 i I • '
I i
:Denton lcitr Lcurcit
oust n City Couu it [a Cars : ctea up lot !east 'I :Security officer required
-aeooot !2 toilets 1 !Event must end so that street cam, coal
cries : 1 at designated 1 m+ :
;Trash contalrer at each ertras•ce !
Danlas :Police Chief :F•r+, Streets, Pablic : A days Abuttlmg ,Dne half ''(Must 'ADpiicant provides for traffic control, ,
1(miss gatherings)! Olrks, SaeVtat',orl pro:erty %f the !assure I clean up and security :
Trassporiatlon, Police,! ion ers !cast of :adequate :Denial if; unreasonably disrupts traffic1 1
: :Nrusing 6 Neighborhood 1 : :for 506+ :the event 1#acil;tiesl : nadequate safety measures i
lServicea, PARD, Health : events : failure to comply with 1
1 requirements : ,
18 Hunan Serrces '
' ' , I 1 I 1 : : I i
ibarland !City Council :City Attorney, ! s30 :Adequate :Notice ,uarlaus Must ! (Public hearing
:(mass gatherings): (Building Insp., Fire, : time :kinds of !assure : (Applicant must provide for clean up and 1 I
!Police and Health !bonds :adequate 1 1 disposal of trash, security, traffic I
141cilltiesi 1 control, parking, noise, and lights 1
I 1 I I
' I 1 1-- 1 1 1 1 ~-1 I
1 !r , IJ I 1 : 1 ' I
:Grand Prairie !Planning and :Comunitr D+Velopmenl, 1 $30 1 : :up to WO: : !City Council may require whatever : I
amass gatA+ N ags)! goring, lhenlEnvironmlntal Health, ! 1 ! : ! ! ! it deems appropriate :
! ! I {!tr Lounciiffirt, Pa11a, and
I 1 :Building Insp.
I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1-- I I I
:Hurst public works !Public works, police ! 140 !10 days !petition ! 1 lcititens !Event can't last longer than 12 hours 1
!Director land Fire i 1 : ! No more than trice a rear I
1 ! I Pal ice can require sop+rvision 1
f :(ruing :City Mariii : td0 : ! 1 1 I
1 - I 1 I 1
i i I, ~ 1 1 1 : ! 1 I '
!Richardson ;Sraffic Supt.lTraffic, Fire and ! ! petition ;Barricades: cilitans !No more than three in the city at !
1 ! 1Police i 1 123 1 ! 1 any Olt time I 1 1 I
i I 1 1 1 I I
l
F
a
f
t'+
!1•lt DFNTON CODE
1 91•li
Sec. 21.11. Use of streets or sidewalks for games.
It shall be unlawful for any person or persons to play base.
ball, softball, football or other similar games in, upon or
across any public street or sidewalk in the city except by ex-
press permission from the city council. (1959 Code, Art. 14.10)
Cream reference-Parke and recreation generally. Ch. 1b.
Sec. 21.12. Defacing or destroying survey reference markers.
It shall be unlawful for any person to Injure, deface, de-
stroy or remove any permanent survey reference marker or
any bench mark and control point marker belonging to the
city. (1959 Code, Art. 14.11)
Cross references-Marklag or defacing windows or doors prohibited, j
1 II.7; vandalism, 1 le-D, r-,1
Sec. 21.19. House numbering,
j
House numbers declared public property, House numbers
shall be public property and shall be subject to change by the
city, with or without notice, at the discretion of the city
council.
I I
Engineering department to a8rign numbers. It shall be the
duty of the engineering department to assign the proper
numbers for houses upon appliaatlon,
If1 A complete, current record of the numbering of all houses
and buildings in the city shall be prepared by the city engi-
near and filed in the office of the city sepetary as a public
record.
Owner or occupant to place numbers. The owner or occu.
_ pant of every house and building In the city *hall place the
street number assigned by the engineering department in
some conspicuous place on or near such house or building so
E that the same may be plainly seen from the street.
jl 9npy, !ia 1t
' 488.2
i
}
1
1
. 877id M AND 811DBWALKS i to 0.961
See. 10.6-28. Manual adopted. (4) At least one large trash container shall
There Is hereby adopted by reference for the be available at each entrance-exit as
purpose of prescribing regulations for the well as other locations necessary to
barricading of public rights-of-way that ensure clean up at the end of the party.
publication entitled "Manual on Uniform (8) A minimum of two (2) portable toilets shall
Construction Barricading Standards." A copy also be pro%ided on site. In the alternate,
of such manual shall be tiled with the city the applicant may present a diagram show.
clerk. (Code 1967,131.88; Ord. No. 770721-A, lag sufficient existing toilet facilities and
pt. 2) written certification that the facilities are
available for public use during the party. If
See. 10.8.26, Occupancy for other than this alternative is accepted, the location of
construction generally, the toilets should beclearly marked during
(a) Any person desiring W temporarily close the party,
any portion of a public street for purposes (6) In their promotional literature, party
other than construction or utility mainte- organizers should urge people to walk
nance purposes shall make application for the to the party,
use of such street to the director of urban (7) party organizers shall rope off lawn or
transportatlon on forms furnished by the other properties of residents within the
city. Such applications for temporary street
closures must be filed with the city a party area who desire such protection,
minimum of twenty-four (24) days before the Such security measures shall not im-
date the street is to be closed and shall be pede acceso to or from the property.
subject to the approval of the city council. (8) A returnable deposit fee established by
(b) As conditions to the approval of a ordinance shall be required to insure
request to close a city street, the following that the ores Is adequately cleaned up,
Items are incorporated in the agreement to (9) At least one party monitor shall be
close the street: stationed at each exit to discourage
(1) A licensed security agent shall br alcohol or cups being taken from the
available on-site during the entire time party area.
the street Is closed. The security agent Specific conditions may be waived by the city
must be uniformed and must be able to council based on prior experience which can
contact the city police or emergency be documented by the city flies. (Code 1967,
medical "rvicee'qulckly in the event a 31.84; Ord. No. 790419-13, pl. 1)
problem develops. The security agent
shall not consume alcoholic beverages got. 10.8.26.1, Occupancy for commer-
or partle)pab In the party. eW film making aotivi•
(2) The applicant shall ensure that the ties.
security agent fills out a report on the (a) Any person desiring temporarily to close a
conditions which exist in the vicinity public street, blocking general public usage, for
during the street party on forms to be the purposes of filming or preparing to film any
furnished by the city. action, shall submit an application for the use of
(3) The party shall be terminated In suff)- such street to the director of urban transportation
cient time (approximately thirty (30) department on forms furnished by the city. Such
minutes) to clean up the immediate and appliestiow for temporary street closure must be
surrounding are" affectod b the flied with the city a minimum of "von (7) days
in order that the street to reopened dat before the initial date the street is to be closed;
the time Got by city council. provided, however, that such aeven-&Y period may
I /rA, tie.1
2W$
I
SPECIAL EVENTS 142A-1
S42A•1
CHAPTER 42A
SPECIAL EVENTS
ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVLSIONS
See. 42A-1. DtfWlloro.
See. 42A-2. General authority and duty of chief of police.
See.12A-3. ChapterCamulative.
W.42A-4. EKemption.
ARTICLE It. SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS
Sec. 412A4. APPilcatien; ISWAA e
W. 42A-6. NOW&
SM. 4 2 A • i. In de mnl [k at I an
Sec. 424-0. Denlal or revocation. ia1 event
Sec. 41A-9. Appeal from dental or revocation of a epee
permlL
f ARTICLE Ill. ENFORCEMENT.
{
see 42A10 OffermS6
\ see.42A-I L: Penalty.
i t
ARTSCLL i. GENERAL P0.0VLS10NS ,
SEC. 41A-1. DEFINITION&
to LMa dkwm Lti APPLICANT mew a person *he has flied / written
apPlkatlea foe a apeolal event perml4
CHHIE~~ LICE mews tlw chkf
DLIIAA, Of I of polloa of the city of
(2) (3) CITY mesa the city of DdW. Taxi.
141 DEMONSTRATION MOWS I PubDo "PLAY of the sttltude of
ufemblyd Pew towed A per"% cam, laws. of otMr matter.
(S) PEPS014 means an Individual, oral. pwt*r p, coflo"oa.
aaWisilon, w other leo entity.
rase. t 146
i
f I
G s:
~93d
NOV 2 2
CITY OF 13 E: rI.ii:
LEGAL DZ'r!,
.
r
W
142A-2 DALLAS CITY CODE 142A-2
(6) SPECIAL EVENT means a temporary event or gathering.
In whicch he Special number of eithet exceeds pubUC property,
75 during y day
of the Went and which Involves one or more of the following activities,
except when the activity is for conatructlon or homemoving purposes
only:
(A) closing • public street;
(8; blocking or restrictlon of public property; •
(Cr sale of merchandise, food, or bevereges on pabUc
property outside the central business district, or on private Property 1
where otherwise prohibited by ordinance;
101 erection of a lent on public properly, or on prfralt
property where otherwise Prohibited by oldWnce;
(E) inalallallon of a stage, hwAshell, !railer, van, potable
building, gr%ndstwo or blesehen on public property, or on private
property where otherwise prohibited by oeftsita;
(F) placement of Potable toilets on pubUtt property, or on
Private property when otherwise Prohibited by ordinance; or
(G) Placement of temporary r*-psridng sign In a pubW •
right-of-way.
(7) SPECIAL EVENT PARADE mean the assembly of three or
more person whose gathering Is foe the common design of lrsv*IWW or
matching In pm*mlon from one loealton to any other location for the
a
pupoaeppeeor advertising, promotln~bI celebrating, oe commemorating expression
thing. of fee= and orr caunwA poUtIcA reDgia+, or social losties.
Ii SPECI
PER Wet of poUa toAtaid aEspeela! aMent (Ord Noe. 18702, mews written approvaj from the
SEC. 42A-!. ENEREAL AUTHORITY AND DUTY OF CHIEF OF
POLIC.
enforced byhe rovil o ns of thIs chapter ahaU be admWatered and
(b) TW chief of poUee has authority to isaon a special events
permit that aut)lorlxes one or mom of the activities described in Section
42A-116) when mquiremertts of this chapter have been met.
(c) Application for a special tventA permit autMrists appropriate
city dedai tmenls to IMA permits for the activities described In Section
42A-1(661 in location where the activity would otherwW be prohibited
by ordinance. (Old. 1,6702)
2-88 1256.2
I
1
I
I~ r
f
542A-3 SPECIAL EVENTS 142A-5
SEC. 42A-3. CHAPTER CUMULATIVE.
The provisions of this chapter are cumulative of all city ordinances.
Tent permits. Wilding permits, electrical permits, food establishment
permits, alcoholic beverage licenses, and all olhtr permits required by
ordiuuuce or othher law for specific activities to be conducted in
conjunMlon with or as pars of the speclat event must be applied for
separately in accordance with the applicable ordinance or law. (Ord.
18702)
SEC. 42A-4. EXEMPTIONS.
The provisions of this chapter do not apply to:
(1) a special event conducted entirely on:
(A) Property under the control of the put and
recreation board,
(S) the "convention center" or "reunlon arena" u
de(M in Section 43-127 of this trade;
ICI the "g3udelpal product market* u deftlted to
Section 29-3 of " code; at
(D) the city hall plaag at
(2) a parade, as dented In Section 28.168141 of this code
for which a permit has been lasted under Article XVI of Chapter 28 of
Ii this code; provided that a special events permit is obtained for arty
activity root covered by the panda permit that is catdueW in
conjunction with the pandit and comes within the definition of a special
event; or
(3) a demonstration at a fixed location other than the
roadway of a stmt. lord Noe. 18702; 198691
~ ARTICLE If
SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS,
SEC. 42A-S. APPLICAT[ON;L9SUANCE.
W A person deslMit to hold a special event shall apply for a
special event permit by filing with the chief of police is written
application upon a form provided foe that purpose. Each application
must be scaonnpanled by a nonnfundable applkmtlon fee of 526. An
application must be filed not less than 45 days before the special event is
to beglr}. The chief of polka may waive the 46-day filing requirement If
determines that the t liaatlon can be processed In Less thus 46 days,
i taking Into eonsidentioe the number and types of permits required to be
tswed in conjunction with the special event permit.
soma 1358.3 246
C 4 .
r'
NOW
142A-5 DALLAS CITY CODE 142&-5 •
lbi An application must contain the follovln4 information:
ill the name, sddmai vd telephone number or the
applicant and of any other persons responsible for the conduct of the
special event; '
(21 a description of the special event and requested dates
and hours of opersllon for the event;
(7) the estimated number of person to participate in the
special event;
(4) a sketch showing the area or route to be used during the
special event, along with proposed structures, tents, fences, barricades,
Cgm, barmen, Lad restroom facilitIm
(5) ptovislon for parking with it designation of when "No
Parking" Signs will be used;
(6) details of how apptksnt proposes to provide security and
traffic control;
(7) the time and location or street closings, if any us
requested;
l81 details a the sale of mecc a the sale seMn
of food or alcoholic beversifes at the special ecial event, dnlgnat atlrg any
y
street vendors or peddlers Involved;
(9) description of animals to be used-lit the special event, It
any; (10) details of how the applicant will clean up the area used
all it the special event, It on pubtle propety; and
it 11) proof that the applicant possesses or to able to obtatrr all
Licenses and permits required by this code or other city ordinance or by
state law for the conduct of the special event,
(c1 upon receipt of the completed application, the elder of police
shall forward a copy of the application to the depuiments off , M~
and human Services, housing and neighborhood services, pubtle streets and astutation, and transportsllon and to the Dallas tranlt
system. If any put of the event is to be held on or adjacent to pick
property, the chief of polka shall also forward a copy of the application
to the put and recreation board. Each department shall review the
application and return It, with any comments, to the chief of polka
within 10 working days of rocelpt,
2-46 1954.4
I l
r'
I
jJ2A-8 SPECIAL EVENTS 142A-7
fdl The departments and the chief of police may prescribe
licenses and permits required by other city ordlnances or applicable law,
restrictions, regulations, costs for oily services, safeguards, and other
corditlops necessary for the sale and orderly conduct of a special event,
to be incorporated into the permit berore I.uuance.
(el A deposit of one-half or the estimated costs required to be
paid to the city as a result of a special event must be received by the
chief of police not less than five days before the date of the special
event as shown on the special event permit. All or part of the fees
required to be reimbursed to the city as a result of A special event may
be waived by resolutlon of the city council.
M After reviewing the application and departmental comments,
the chief of poUce shall issue the special event permit unless denial Is
required by Section 42A-8. A special event permit will be issued for a
period not to exceed 10 consecutive days. A separate permit is required
for each 10-day period duri which it special event will be conducted.
(Ord, Nos. 18702; 19212; 19869)
SEC. 42A-6- NOTICE.
(a) An applicant for a permit to hold a special event in which the
estimated number of puilripants eaceeda 500 duryg any day of the
special event shall, at least 20 days before the special went begins,
deliver nice to all owners or occupants of real propertyy abutl the
boundaries of the area In which the special event will be conducted,
Includintt all owners or occupants of real property abuttiq the route of it
progressive event such as a speclal event parade or marathon.
(N The notice must be deUvered to the address of each abutllrg
property.
(cl The notlea must slate that an oppUestion foe a apxtal event
permit has been filed for the location and that Interested ptnon may
contact the chief of poke with their comments. (Old. Noe. 18702;
19869)
SEC. 42A.7. INDEMNIFICATION,
An appUcant for a special event permit must eaccute a written
sgrcemeat to indemnify the city and Its officer and employed agalnet
all clAlms of Injury or damage to person or property, whether pubUo or
private, aria q out of the special event., (Ord 18702)
1 ~ 1958.5 4-88
i ,
y~
's
I
k
j Y
k
r
142A•8 DALLAS CITY CODE 142A-8 •
SEC. 42A-8. DENIAL OR REVOCATION.
(a) The chief of police shall deny a Special event permit 'fl
(I) a special event permit has been granted for another
special event at the same place ud lime;
(2) the proposed special event will occupy any put of a
(reeway, ezp"Way, or tollway;
0) the proposed special event will wu*asonably disrupt the •
orderly flow of traffic aid no reasonable means of rerouting traffic or
otherwise meeting traffic needs is available;
(4) the applicant fails to adequately provide for
(A) the protection of event putlcipanU;
(R) maintenance of public order In and around the
special event location;
(C) crowd security, taking Into conalderstlon the size
and character of the event; at
I01 emergency vehicle access; •
151 the applicant (nlL to comply with or the proposal
special event will violate a city ordinance at other apiptlethis law, unless
the prohibited conduct or activity would be showed w+aer this chapter,
(8) the applicant makes a false statement of material fret
on an application for a special event permit;
17) the applicant falls to provide proof that he poreres or
is able to oblaln a llcesre or permit required by city etdinance or other
applicable law for the conduct of all acllv;t(es Included sa pat of the
special event;
18) the applicant has had a special event permit revoked
w(tWn the preceding 14 months;
49) the applicant hu committed, within the pcecedittg 14 •
months, two air more violation of a condition or provision of a special
event permit or ibis chapter, re
(10) the applicant fails to pay any mute ding oow owed to
the city far It put apeclal ovent.
(b) She chief of pollee shall revoke a special event permit Us
2-~ 1958,8
% f
i
^A
t~
,
r
L
I
k
Il
142A-5 SPECIAL EVENTS 142A-11
111 the applicant fsilsto comply with or the special event is
In violation of a condition or provision of the special event permit, an
ordinance of the city, or any other applicable law; or
121 the permit holder made it false statement of material
fact on an application for a special event permit, (Ord. Nos. 18702;
19899)
i SEC. 42A-9. SPAPPEAL FROM ECIAL EVENT PERMIT. AL OR REVOCATION OF A
] If the chief o: police denles the tmuvict of a permit or revokes a
permit, he Shull send to the applicant or permit holder by certified mail,
return receipt requested written notice of the denial or revocation and
of the right to an ii pealpoe The applicant or permit holder may spFeal the ito it accccosrdance ith Section M of"ceode il(Ord. 187021 appeal board In
I
ARTICLE Ill. ENFORCEMENT.
! SEC./2.1-10. OFFENSES.
W A person commits an offers It has
(1) commeneesor conducts aSpecial event without a special
event persalt; or
i
(2) falls to comp.~,lr•y With my requirement er provlsion of a
special event permit at this enapter.
the commisalea of
offer Wider this seU09it (Or& Noe. Ib09;1 98881
an
SEC, 42A-16 PENALTY.
IS) A person who violates t provision of this chapter or a
requirement of a special event permit W Nulty o of i sepairste
comf sit f tic which each day or pact of a day durir+g
contir "
r~ 1358.7 2-88
p
I ~
I
I
t
,
i
ti
142A-11 DALLAS CITY CODE 142A-11
(hi Each ofrenae Is pun"ta by a fine not to exceed:
(1) $2,000 for a violallon of a provision of this ctapter of a
r"W ent of asp attlev et permit jovernlnE rite safety, z", or
public health Lnd n41q dumping of reface; or
(2) $500 for all other violatlons of lids chaptof or a
requirement of a special event permit. (Ord. Nee. 18702; 19889)
I
1
j I
+I
I
2-H 1888.1
i
r~
II
IJ
I
1
I ,
r~
V
I
I
M
h
I 1 1258 OCCUPATIONS. LICENSES AND PERMITS 119-66 ! 1
Seca. 1263, 1256. Reserved. I
ARTICLE IV. MASS GATHERINGS
Sec. 1254. Deflnldons.
(a) "Mass gathering" shall mean any meeting or gathering
held within the limits of the City of Garland or within five
thousand (6,000) feet thereof, unless the same be within said five
thousand (5,000) feet distance and a permit therefor shall have been 1
granted by a political subdivision of the State of Texas, which
attracts or can be expected to attract more than one thousand
I (1,000) persons, all or most of whom, will remain at the location
I of the gathering for a period of more than twelve (12) continjoua
{ hours.
if (b) "Issuing official" shall, mean the city council of the City of
Garland, Texas.
(c) "Promoter" shall mean any person, group of persona, firm,
1 corporation, partnership,ur association that organizes, promote*,
I
manages, finances, holds or assists in any of the same, a mass
gathering. (Ord. No. 1983, 11, 8-3.71)
Sec. 1266. Permit required.
No person shall act as a promoter of a mass gathering as
defined herein unless he obtains a permit from the issuing offi.
cial under the provisions of this aekle. This prohibition shall
apply whether or not the promoter is the owner of the property;
howevt4 only one (1) permit per mace gathering shall be re-
quired. (Ord. No. 1983, 11, (-3.71)
I
I
Sapp No. W 586
F
I
/ 1 11•67 OCCUPATIONS, LICENSES AND PERMITS 1 14.67
{ See. 12.57. Permit application,
(a) A sufficient time to allow for investigation, notice,
and hesring before a mass gathering is to be held, the pro-
moter of ,he mass gathering shall file with the city secretary
and application for permit. Any such jxrmit shall be ac-
companied by the sum of $50,00 to pay for notices to be
given and Investigations to be made.
(b) The application ahail inclut!.e the following:
(1) The name and residence address of the promoter.
(2) A financial statement reflecting all funds which ate
being supplied to finan:e the mass gathering,
(S) The exact location by metes and bounds, If necessary,
of the property on which such mase gathering Is to
be held and the name and address of the owner thereof.
(4) The dates and tlmea that the mass gathering will be
held.
(6) The number of persons the promoter will allow to at-
tend the mass gathering and the plan which the pro
motor Intends to use to limit attendance to this
f number.
(8) The names and addressee of the performers, if any,
who have agreed to appear and a copy of such agm-
w';ui!Hiiw~w ;ar~glWuena 6 :::!I;; ment.
(7) A description of all steps taken by the promoter to
assure that minimum standards of sanitation and health
will be maintained during the mass gathering.
(8) A detailed description of how litter, refuse, garbage,
debris, and other waste matter are to be collected and
disposed of,
(9) A description of all preparations being made to provide
traffic control and parking facilities and to assure
that the mass gathering will be conducted in an or-
derly fashlon and that the physical safety ct the per.
i
sons In attendance will be protected.
(10) A description of all facilities and provisions made to
assure persons In attendance adequate food, shelter,
drinking water, and, if necessary, sleeping and bathing
facilities.
Sapp. No. 20 684
1'~ c
i
i
,
I
I
1 12.57 GARLAND CODE 117.59
(11) A description of the preparations made to provide ade. J
quate medical and nursing care. 1
(12) A description of the preparations made to supervise
minor persona who may attend the mass gathering,
(13) Preparations made and devices to be used to guarantee
the noise, whether front musical Instruments, sing.
ing voices, amplifiers, or otherwise, generated by such
mass gathering shall not be disturbing to persons not
on the premises where such mass gathering is held.
114) The lighting facilities, if any, and their time of opera- 1
tion, if any, on or to be located on the premises where
the mass gathering is to be held. (Ord. No. 1963, 11,
8.3.71)
See. 12.58. Investigation.
The city manager shall designate which departments and
officials shall Investigate the application; however, such ap-
plication shall always be investigated by the city attorney's 1
office, the building Inspection department, the fire depart.
ment, the police department, and the health department.
f Each Investigating entity shall furnish a written report to
the issuing official Informing whether or not the mass gather-
Ing, Its facilities, and preparations conform to law, adequately
satisfies the Intent of the necessary -)recautionary measures
set out in the Immediately preceding section, and sufficiently
protects the health, safety, morals and general welfare. All
such entitles shall be available to give testimony relating to
their reports at the hearing before the issuing official. (Ord.
No, 1963, 4 1, 8-5.71)
See. 1249. Hearing.
(a) After notice to Interested parties, the issuing official
shall hold a pubtic hearing on the application, and any per-
sons may appear and testify for or against the granting of
such permit.
(b) Notice for the purposes of this section shall mean a
letter, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the resident
address of the promoter and one publication in a newspaper
of general circulation In the county. (Ord. No. 1963, ¢ 1, 8-
3.71)
Supp. No. 20
~
688
I
I
J
t
/ I 1r-e0 OOCUPATIONS, LICENSES AND PERMITS 1 la es
t\ See. 12.60. Findings; permit.
(a) If the issuing official determines, based on the evi-
dence available, the holding of such mass gathering would
not be detrimental to the health, safety, morale and general
welfare. It shall issue the permit.
(b) Such permit shall be conditional on the preparations
set out In section 12-57, being satisfactorily compl*ted and
maintained. Such permit shall be automatically void if all
such preparations are not complete twenty-four (24) hours
before the beginning of such wasa gathering.
(c) Fraud or misrepresentation shall be grounds for rev.
ovation by the Issuing official at any time.
(d) Such permit may be issued and granted with additional
requirements thereon. Such requirements may include, with-
out limitation, performance bonds, payment bends, bonds to
insure the premises Is left In a litter free condition, Insur-
ance, and hiring of off-duty peace officers at the promoter's
1 expense.
(e) Failure to comply with such requirements shall auto-
iihji~jr,n matlcally render said permit void ab initio. (Ord. No. 19651
4 1, 8-5-71)
Sec. 12.61. Application for new permit.
If a permit hereunder is cancelled or rendered void for any
reason, a new application shall be required and 6roceadings
thereon shall be as if no application had been previously
had, (Ord. No. 1085, 4 1, 8-5-71)
See. 1282. Violation of article.
A mass gathering held without the permit required herela
Is defined u a nuisance and the holding or anticipated hold.
Ing may be the subject of Injunctive or other extraordinary
relief. Cumulative thereof and supplemental thereto, violation
of any of the provisions of this ordinance (article) shall be
a misdemeanor punishable in accordance with section 1.5 of
Sutrp• No. St
{ 689
I
P
1
1
11!•6! GARLAND COU&
I tl.T1
thlS Code, and any performer, promoter, property owner, am.
ployee, Customer, Spectator, or participant shall be equally
amenable. (Ord. No. 1969, # 2, 8.3.71)
I 1
1 j }
i
r~
,
-T
1
ORDINANCE NO. 7945
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2299, BEING THE COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING pRDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS, BY ADDING A
i ` CLASSIFICATION OF SPECIAL EVENTS TO SECTION B-100 AND ALLOWING
SAID USE IN ANY DISTRICT BY RE'sOLUT10N OF THE CITY COUNCIL;
PROVIDING A DEFINITION; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSEI REPEALING
I PROVIDING
P BLICATION THAT IT BEOOME
ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HER
EFFECTIVE UPON PASSAGEt APPOVAL13ANll
ri
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE,
TEXASI
CTION 1; THAT Section numbered B-100 of the Ordinance No.
2299,SEbe ng the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of
Grand Prslrie, Texas, be, and It Is hereby, amended by adding a
showing cthatnthis* sueiIs allowed LInSanyiozoningOdistrict by
showng
resolution of the City Council for specified period only.
_ SECTION 21 THAT Section numbered B-800 of Ordinance No. i
dedfbyhad ing the
2299j being Grand Prairie, hTexas, be eandvItzIsiher ordinance
following provisions to the definitions therein contained, to-
will
.
No. 49. Special Events Any event or activity tl.at will
not be a permanent use of the land involved, without the use ,
C or construction of any permanent structures or fixtures and
that will occur only periodically for a short period of
time. The use must be in harmony with the spirit of this
zoning ordinance and that It will not adversely affect other
property or people in the vicinity. All applicable ;
ordinances, codes and permits shall be applied for and/or J
met as to insure conformance to use. Outside display may
occur for this limited duration of the special event or '
activity where such display may normally be prohibited.
Temporary facilities such as tents, portable trailers,
stages, etc. must be separately permitted and be limited in
their existence to the duration of said special event, etal.
weeks or activity shall be limited In
Anroposed
two event
two any (2)calweek endar eyear. Upon
occurrence not to exceed twice In
of
special cause or conditions, s
said special use may be granted upon findings of said
conditions by the Directors of Community Development (zoning
and land use)l Environmental Health (health codes and Police
associated food permits code nds enfocement); ; Fir and Official
Departments (public safe4 )l
(structural permits), or thetaadesignated representatives.
I In the event a person or organization desires or needs any
additional time or duration than the two (2) week extension
l above and beyond the original two (2) weeks approved by
1. staff (four (4) weeks cumulative per occurrence or eight {8)
weeks cumulative per calendar year), then the request must
be appealed before the City Council.
I
i
~I
Said request, with any supporting information, plans or
r documents deemed appropriate or necessary shall be forwarded
to the Planning and Zoning CommlaaIon at the earliest
C possible and legally published meeting and then to City
Council with their recommendation. The City Council action
shall be considered final and If approved shall be an
approval for only said calendar year. The City Council
shall specify the time or times or the special event and may
impose any other requirements and safeguards It deems
necessary, ff
j
The application shell Include a tee of thirty dollars II
($30.00), Dependent upon the nature or scope of the special
event that may be approved, a deposit of two hundred and
fifty dollars ($250,00) shall be paid to Insure appropriate
cleaning up and restoration of the specified place or
property, This deposit will be made at the determination of
those departments or divisions responsible for review of
applications if deemed necessary. Upon termination of the 1
---1 special event and complete restoration the fee (or portion
thereof if in non-conformance) will be refunded.
j This ordinance is not Intended to nor will It provide•for
ii Itinerant vendors to be classified as special events, etc.
3 and would be covered by other applicable ordinances
regulating Itinerant vendors.
SECTION 33 THAT if sny section, subsection, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason
l held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such shall be deemed a separate, distinct and
! Independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 11 TRAT all ordinances or parts of ordinances In
conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION 31 THAT this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication,
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND
PRAIRIE, TEXAS, this the 11th day of February _ , 1988.
f~ ls/ J. V. Debo III
I MAYOR, CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE, 'MXAS
' ATTE M
4 ~
/s/ Sue Sbswver
City Secretary PIN
J
rr•
V
0
i
I
L
2,
3 ORDINANLE NO. 1243 J
4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE HURST CODE OF 1
ORDINANCES BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE ARTICLE 8; PROVIDING FOR
THE CLOSING OF CITY STREETS TO PROVIDE FOR BLOCK PARTIES.
S
WHEREAS, the City Councl desires to accommodate the owners of
6 property desiring to hold block parties by providing for the
closing of city streets adjacent to such ownerships if such can
7 be done without interfering with traffic flowl NOW,
THEREFORE,
8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HURST,
TEXAS:
9
Sec. 1. THAT Chapter 24 of the Hurst Code Ordinances be amended
10 by adding thereto a new Article 8 which reads as followss
11 "Article 8 - Block Parties
12 Section 24-191. Conditions
The Director of Public Works shall issue a permit temporarily
13 closing a public street in one or more designated blocks to
allow the residents of a neighborhood to engage in a social
14 function known as a block party if the following requirements
are meta
15 ' (1) An application for the closing of a city rtreet must be
obtained from the Director of Public Works and returned not
16 I later than 30 days prior to the requested date of cloainng.
17 (2) Such application must be signed by all of the owners
whose property abuts the portion of the street to be closed
and the portion of the street to be closed shall be designated
18 on the application.
19 (3) Permits will not be granted for more than a 12 hour
period and no more than two permits per year will be granted
20 for any one block.
E (4) Applications shall be submitted to the Chief of Police
21 and Fire Chief and no permit shall be granted except upon
the certification by the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief and
22 ! the Director of Public Works to the effect that such
temporary street closing will not interfere with necessary
23 traffic circulation, fire and pollee emeageney vehicle routes.
24 i'
I
25
26 `
i
ti
t ,
I 4
f
1
1
2 I
(5) The Chief of Police is authorized to requiredirect at
3 off du. policemen be hired b the applicants to
traffic around the closed area.
4
(6) The Director of Public Works is authorized to
5 ~j DO charge a reasonable fee for delivery and pick up of
barricades to close off the street.. The applicant shall
be responsible for set up and disassembly of barricades.
8
all coThe stsaoflclosinguthetstreeth,sinali cludingibutsnotl pay j
4 limited to, the renting of barricades, hiring of off !
8 duty policemen, if required, and costs of clean up, if
any. The City Manager is authorized to establish a
9 permit fee to cover administrative costs in
!1 investigating and issuing the permit, and to provide
security for payment of other costs.
10
E AND IT IS SO ORDERED. {
k 11
'Passed on first reading on the 22'9,'d day of November
'
1988, by a vote of 8 to
12
Passed on second reading on the _13th day of December ,
13 19880 by a vote of 8 _ to
ISO- ST
u G~
14 15 gy.
r
u er, Mayor
16 E
ATTEST. j
18 Alyceeer ng
lEcity secretary
19 ~IApprovad qs to loan and legality.
20 "
f 21 iG org A. Staples, Jr.
(City Attorney
22
i I 23
24 E~
25 2 i
i
28
i
i
v
I t! IAVINO CITY CODE !1 !.4
Sox. 34.2.3. Adoption of ataater street pica,
4 (a) The 1984 City of Irving Master Street Plan is hereby ap-
proved and adopted by the city council of the city of Irving,
Texas, and a copy of said plan shall be on file in the office of the
city secretary and is incorporated into this section as if it were
actually printed verbatim In this section,
(b) The 1984 master street plan is a comprehensive plan de-
signed to lessen congestion in the streets, to secure safety from
fire, panic and other dangers, to promote the health and general
welfare of the general public, to provide adequate light and air,
f to prevent the overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentra•
tion of population and to facilitate the adequate provision of
transportation, and it is the declared intent and purpose of the +
city council of the City of Irving in enacting this section that this
city curving %faster Street Plan shall be used and adhered to In
the improvement, development, extension and opening of new
streets; provided, however, that the final alignment will be estab-
lished at the time the improvement or opening of e particular
street is undertaken or when an area of the City of Irving through J
which the street will traverse, is being platted. In this connec•
tion, conditions and situations may arise that will require modi.
fications and changes that will better serve the public interest, J
and when such an occasion arises, this plan may be changed or
I amended to effect minor modifications or changes by resolution
` duly adopted by the city council; however, any mayor modiGca•
tion, alteration or chap
~ ge shall be accomplished as provided by J
yr„tea . law and evidenced by the enactment of an ordinance by the city I
council. (Ord. No. 2275, 44 1-3, 3.23.72; Ord. No. 3174, it 2, 31
10.19.78; Ord. No. 4544, If 1, 2, 10.25.841
Editor, aote-Ord, No. 2275, II 1-3, ban` non amendatory of this Code has I
bnn included herein as 134-13 at the discretion of the edllo-s. Section 3 of Ord. ~
No. 3174, adopted Oct 19, 1978, emended 134.2 31cito read as herein set forth; 1
i 2of said Ord. Yo. 7174 did not expressly emend the Code. but was included herein
at the ediWr'a discretion ax superseding former subsections sal end lb+.
I
I See 34.2.4. Closing of streets for neighborhood block parties;
application, fee.
i (a) An applicant wishing the temporary closure of a street
In the City of Irving for the purpose of conducting a
I
I Sapp. No. 28 262.124
it
a
i
r
,
13+.7.5 STR££TSANSI SSU£WAS.XS (1349.3
neighborhood block party shall file an application with the
+ city manager of the City of Irving requesting said closure
ar,d sold application shall contain the following:
(1) Location;
(2, reriod of time street to be closed..
(b1 Applicant shall tender sixty dollars (s60.00) with said
r application to cover administrative and field cost as well as
a portion of the liability insurance protecting the City of
Irving in the event bodily injury or property damage occurs
as a result of the street closing.
(c) Should the application be in proper form the city
manager at his sole discretion may approve or deny said
! application for street closure. (Ord. No. 2358. 1--3.
8.24.72)
F.ditor'+ note-Satins :W1 t is derived (rum Ord. No. ZVO. H 1-3.
$aid „rdinana did aM amend this Code.
Sec. 344.6. Procedure to be followed by persons eeek•
ing street name change.
t (a) All requests for street name changes shall be initiated by
the applicant filing a request with the department of community
development identifying the street, stating the reason for the
requested street name change, and the requested name. The
department of community development shall notify each prop-
erty owner abutting the street in that section of the street which
name has been requested to be changed of the time, date and
location of the public hearing before the city council. Said notift•
cation of the public hearings shall be sent by U.S. mail, postage
paid, to the owners of real property abutting the subject street as
their names and addresses appear on the last approved City of
Irving Tax Roll. In addition, said notice of the public hearings
shall be advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in the
City of Irving at least fifteen 113) days prior to the hearing before
the city council.
1b) Ail requests initiated and filed prior to June 1, 1987, shall
be accompanied by a fee of sixty dollars ($60.00). All requests for
street name changes filed on or after June 1, 1987, shall be
i
Supp. No. 38 262.125
I ,
4
s
ISSVINC OF BLOCK PARTY PETITIONS
1. When a resident comes in, give them a petition form, and ,
a memorandum to fill out. Many times you can fill out the
(top part only) of memorandum yourself.
Our Traffic Superintendent fills in who approves the activity.
2. The petition form should have all the names of the residents
on the block on it where the party is going to be held. Where
there is a vacant home, or if someone is away on vacation, just
fill in that space, vacant or on vacation which ever is the case.
Return this form to us with a $25.00 deposit, and the memo/with
their name (name of party responsible for the barricades and
lights).
3. Finish filling out memorandum (if need be) and give it to Larry
Mclnis (our Traffic Superintendent) for his signature.
I
4. Xerox four (4) copies of the Memo and the check, for: a)for
the party holding the party, bone for the Fire Department,
c)one for the Police Department, d)one for the file, the
original goes to Larry Mclnis at the Service Center office.
5. Wnen the barricades, or cones, or lights are being delivered,
the middle section of the memorandum is then filled out. The
delivery is usually made sometime on Friday before the week-
end, or a few days before a Holiday, whichever the case. Many
people give their phone numbers, so they can be called before
the delivery.
Please note, when each block party memo is being filled out,
put a number in the right hand corner, with the corresponding
number on the petition in the same corner, for easier "tracking"
later. A monthly calendar is kept with the number of the block
party on it. This helps "at a glance" not to schedule more
parties than you have equipment for.
(The checks are held in the cash box, stamped, but NOT DEPOSITED.
6. After the party, or activity, and the barricades and lights have
been picked up, and Larry calls to let you know that all is in
order, he then sends over the original memorandum, stating who
picked up the items, if they have been all accounted for, or
missing, along with his signature, I then return the check .o ,
the party who issued thr check.
Any parades, or street activity such as bike marathons, races,
vendors, etc - must go through the City Secretary's Office first.
I
1/ll/g9sm
I
1
i
V
i
A
BLOCK PARTY PETITION
I, the undersigned resident in the block of
request that our street be closed for _a D o` city on _
from to I understand that I am respor_sT5Te Tor the barricades an q ts'
prov 7e~tTie City~a $25.00 deposit for the barricades and lights is attached to this re-
quest. It is also my understanding that the $25.00 deposit will be returned when the barricades
and lights are picked up by the Street Department, and are found to be in good condition. The
following Person accepts responsibility for the barricades and lights until they are returned to
the City of Richardson, and agrees to Pay for any damages to, or loss of, barricades and lights.
r Mnature -Address Telephone No,
The barricades will be delivered to the above noted person prior to the time of the Block Party.
Petition must b? submitted one (1) week prior to the party for Traffic Control approval. The
City can furnish barricades for only three (3) Block Parties per week-end, and petitions are
acrdpted on a first come, first serve basis. The undersi ned residents do not object to their
street being blocked off during the hours note a residents on the street mustsign).
NAME ADDRESS -NAME ADDRESS
I
i
l
ii
6
1 {
6
4
I
CITY OF RICHAROSON memorandum
NOTICE OF SPECIAL ACTIVITY
Dater
--1 The special activity of Block Party Parade Other
will be held on from
see back or details)
to in the block of
Barricades, lights and/or traffic cones to be delivered to
I ~
I ,
This activity is approved by and/or
cer Fire Department
Police Department Larry nts
Traffic Operations Traffic Superintendent
By signature belov, the citizen acknowlegea receipt of small barricades,
A-Frame barricades, lights, an//or traffic ce::.is.
le up of All accounted fort Yea No
Missingt
E
Cost of Items los n
Larry F. McInis~-i-
#!#!!!!!!#!#!!#!#!!!!•a!##r###!####!!#!!!!!lwaTraffic Superintendent
Deposit returned/Amount received =
to
cct Traffic Operations
"-Init aTali"
F
y
BLOCK PARTIES
MONTH
SUN MON TOES WED THURS FRI SAT
i
i
i
REMARKS
i
i
v
f
P
'I IT-1444+4-Hif Will I'll' "I'm' 11 '-H+H+H I
F 1-1
I
I
I
~ i
i
E
-1-L T73:111IJ--L
44 11 Lj
M111114 M. M.
V
CITYofDENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817) 686.8307 JJ
Office of the City Manager 1
M E M O R A N D U M 11
r~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 1
FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary
E DATE: February 16, 1989 '
SUBJECT: Agenda Back-up for Item #5.C.1. Board ,
Appointments
The Airport Board still has a vacancy after the resignation of
Dante Ferrara.
The Human Services (Resources) Committee has a vacancy after
the resignation of Reginald Logan.
j The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission hac a vacancy
after the resignation of Vivian Edwards.
The Low/Moderate Income Housing Task Force had the following
five members resign: Phil Shea, Lucy Campbell, Reginald Logan,
Paul Ephraim, and Norma McCarthy. Council has appointed Mark
Floyd, Birdell Caretarphen and Ceila Williamson to the Task
Force with 2 vacancies still existing.
If you need any further information, please let me know.
,
Je e a r
C1 y Secretary
1
1
I
LJ
r.~
f
a
i
i
I
~V
V
I I
I~ Iii 1
J
1 ~ I
1
j
~J
RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION OF
W. W. "DICK" KLEIN
WHEREAS, W. W. "Dick" Klein is retiring after 22 years of
dedicated service to the City of Denton since his employment on
July 1, 1967; and
WHEREAS, during his career with the City, W. W. "Dick" Klein
has consistently maintained an attitude of cooperation with and
dedication to the stated goals of the Utilities, Electric
Production Department of the City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, W. W. "Dick" Klein has exhibited outstanding
expertise, dedicating much time and effort in assisting with the
work of the Utilities, Electric Production Department and has
shown great spirit in encouraging community involvement in the
best interests of the citizens of Denton; and
WHEREAS, W. W. "Dick" Klein has always served above and
beyond tFe mere efficient discharge of his duties and has
responded to his duties in a loyal, trustworthy and extremely
faithful manner, in a spirit of cooperation with his fellow
employees, and in the best interests of the citizens of the ;
community; NOW, THEREFORE,
! ~ r
i BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I. That the sincere and warm appreciation of the
City Council a formally conveyed to N. W. Dick' Klein" in a
` permanent manner by spreading this resolution upon the official
minutes of the City Council and forwarding to him a true copy
hereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of February, 1989. I
i
RA. STEPHENS; MAYOR
ATTEST:
i I
1
JENNIFER WKETERS, CITY SECRETARY
i
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOUD. MORRIS, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
• s
J
k
1
JZIDZ=
II ~
i
1
1
~ { 1
11
I
I
I
l1~
11
I
I
/1 1
I t -1 AL
-11 Ilil'',
rT
n
i
51
DATE: 02/02/69
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT p?,A•
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBIeCT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOq 2-88-019.
RECUMMEND_ATION:
Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval.
SUMMARY:
The proposed use is 6,000 square foot lots for single family
development. The three northern lots on the west side of
Hayfield Drive Will remain duplex but will be compatible with the
single family on 6,000 square foot lots.
BACKGROUND:
j In 1984, the City Council approved a planned development for single
~ family with 6,000 square foot lots, multi-family restricted an
duplexes. An amendment was recommended by the Planning and Zoning
Commission for zero lot residences on this property but was not
consideree by the Council at the request of the petitioner, In
ofa1n%owne88, 36-38uoftBlocksBmofatheses
Audra Meadows Addition.
PROGRAMS, OEPARTMS'iT5 OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
I
Nine property owners within 200 feet were notified.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact.
Resp ully a bmi .
Lloy V. carrell
Prepared by: City Manager
C; Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
9 APP d:
rant N. Robbins, AICP
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
1593k
k
Y I
u
Y
S
}
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
To; Denton City Council
Case No.; Z-88-019 Meeting Date: February 21, 1989
GENERAL INFORMATION
_ Applicant: First State Bank
~1 101 South Locust
Denton, TX 762U1
E Status of Applicant: Owner
Requesred Action: Amendment to PD-83 to allow the
development of single family detached {
lots of 61000 square feet.
Location and Size: The property is located south of
Audra Lane along the east and west
sides of Bayfield Drive and along a
portion of the south side of Brittany
Drive.
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - SF-71 Agricultural, vacant
South - PD-73 (SF & LI), vacant
East - PD-27 (MP), vacant
West - Agricultural, vacant
Denton Development Guide: Low intensity area
I -
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Audra Lane is a secondary arterial,
Bayfield and Brittany Drives are
residential/local streets. Durin
phase two, repairs to Bayfield Drive
will be necessary in order to patch
where the utilities are extended to
the lots on the east side of street.
Utilities: A 6" water line and b' sewer line are
located along Brittany and Bayfield
Drives. Electric service
is provided underground.
I
d+
V
(Case Z-88-019)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
f Drainage: Drainage improvements have beers
'h completed.
HISTORY
In 1984, tihc City Council
15.8 acres, inc luding this approved a planned development on
on 6,000 pt square foot lots, duplexes ~onob, 000 gsquare ifoot elotsed
and multi-family restricted in 19880 the commission approved
' side of thOf the e duplex~lex secti. on to create separate lots for each
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of an
amendment to
zero lot linepdevelopmenteandotwonb,OOOfsquareofeet5lots for
single family detached use;
case be however the ) lots for
withdrawn from the June 7 petitioner requested the
1988 Council agenda.
In October, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval of a detailed to allow the development of residences on
6,000 square foot lots. The proposal included Lots 25, 26, and
1 27 of Block A and Lots 20-34 and Lots 36-38 of Block B
Audra Meadows Addition. of the
The
be withdrawn from the Decem
ber e13, over requested that the case
to an ownership question with Jots 31988 6-38CofyBlockcBloft$he due
i Meadows Addition, te Audra
ANALYSIS
The property is located in a low intensity area (Area #26). Th area is 511 under the intensity standard based on existing land
use and 21 over the Intensity based on existing zoning based one
the Denton Development Guide. The amendment proposes density of
S un is per acre w c w 1 result in a decrease in intensity,
~In addition, the reduction in intensity also means the property
will only be using its proportionate share of intensity.
Low intensit
The amendment would City,
detached housing stock in the City. The proposed lots are
approximately 6,000 square feet and are compatible with the
adjacent lots in the Audra Meadows subdivision.
v
* r
(Case Z-88-019)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
A residential structure has been constructed on Lot 35 of Block
B and Lots 36-38 of Block B remaining two-family should not
negatively impact the development of the Planned Development.
Duplex structures on remaining lots would be compatible with the
6,000 square foot lots.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-88-019
with the following condition:
All buildings shall meet minimum standards for the single
family-7 zoning district, according to Appendix B, Zoning,
of the Code of Ordinances except the minimum lot area shall
be 6,000 square feet.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with additional conditions `
` 3. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Detailed Plan
3. Development Standards
4. Ordinance 84-117
4
0755e
AUDRA MEADOWS Z- -88-019
~ X11 ~
N ~ MN[TM1
ago
AUO11A
O
SITS ,
r y
s
1 {fit a 4
d
goo' .,may , , • ` f
No ~ildl.L
I
JIMO 17, As 3 wrPuR/, I qP[. /y1tllr
r0...
I r0.. lY., ry lit, 011.
A4RICf11ruRA1 ZONING Fu LANE -o~ rr yy
I IM
k yIII 47 C l„
L,.....,....I I I I........,..I 1{ .I w,•. Yra ,yrZ!r m
I I 1 I ~P1'wrP ~f e1Y 0~
rl' 1 r LLLLLL111
C ~ I I I 71 II r+s. N,P ¢ 4J N
Y • r 1 . L........... I:....,5?,.. 19 1 N . r.rrn,
I; 7 /
t~ g
Wol" J. . 1411,
I I 11
r I..... I I
I Ur a rr,mir : i N
...I. ; 100160 ...I. 1I 11 ,I /1 1I r.r•. r• wP a G ri
I......1,\..I' u1r zI 14 l,r rA M,m, 7 Jry
I.. .•..I~...I I~f 34 Il 1111111 43 1I ~'P: irrr°w Oy~Fia~
W I I Iti.......I mN • •I I'in>ii"'A1Ori. h QZZ C~ a
'....,,.~,.i. 3 1 I I ~I e2 1 aHlfr,'.nPl~ 7 0i~
A
11 k....I N r ,I Ia /1 ur a r•.ma 4 T t 4
ul L......... I c i j i 3 II, ,Ii f .~w•:i .ra d
N/ I .I J./ 1 31 I, if Ill 4011 .Y,a m
Il- m,l N , ± Uli,.rm!
• ~y u/. I 1k I 30 1L IlIII l I 39 r::: i. ,ra
y I I INN Inr'i[rs
I, ~ u1 1.1\i.....L 1 I!u I/ 11 29 l k III 38' N rn~a, r .,a
I 1 f
V IV Y r).m>f
k I I 13 I Q
L I I I ~I 37m ~a
2e I I, II I Il
II I r •'.yr,i
WO
jl 36 I Iii Anr rIP LOTS if Are K. kux A, Are
j I 1 I 1 11 1 rNr, i' w,w tail .71• ILOCe
10
U I,11NI MAT" Ap1,kz Aeo ICilvfp 1r
I r I I I rr nq(Y, p C-TCVI LINES Wolof INffiyfl }tpeJ,
A7, I.., l tl I 1 H8, 1, jl I 3S 'l a°i;rir i~ !Nf w{ A wua olit7 rRN1AU0E^~'a tOrOMAINU,I
IUILOiui POM171 DouLLIK usAATO Ie
I,✓... ....1. wtiul newm! FOR LOIS to
il+ I I 1/ 1 i 2 ! t e ill ILO" 1, Ale 1011 to Are H, @LToft 34.
OCX
I y ! 11. 3/ it of N IP.mm All Loa AlMeOVAL W PrWAI RAY, '
o/ /s is N I II11 r
A. aw Wilmot, t o IUILONS PMrl rf SHAALAL Not Sol lot=
I, rr FOR WLOIS VI IT TifIu 47, tLIVVA LMN
Y u1 I I !s I Y / 11 = I I in Au r[r WATU f uxe wlrlci, ra
1 I '•,,10 •,.1. /,.I 1 I, 1I 33 'I Or tall,
l
xrm' MK lots Nuvt Sol 7wTAUm, Arp
t•, ruP. 1' r+°s ci 0014 A 1e eduNeO OII
e OrMfttlo K/UtLT TO
I'•' f I f' 9
OF rw CITY SATISFACTION
01MLOFOI.1
f ! 32
7 /i1 I I 23 ` I I •I ` =1I 31 II Ir,f jr+•r a OIRrC1. 1WIiRtIT AT 04 SATISFACTION
r I I i I nnr 1
I L1 ~ , ~ mrr.r r rrP 4 MN WW NATO 1 KT1A ft7rvltU
f IK" N Palo POO eY " OCVILO l
AP 22 l
I ! s r rlrm. a T 40AxO, Ill die 7%,TA 4.0
Y' wP. Y Yo IY root ctrr, r4y
hl 11 .,........,.I i w III OI I 1 oI rra,., A- NrP IWfTALL10 AT Doll TIK 11ASO 0
INElU1LOIW1 N IATFt0.i air[.
if M
I f 21 I~~ I I p 06TIA Wry1Ctf TO N AI
, 30 jI AN A Ae„m, pI.LL IIF AMT
+ I II + I I fl i °a•: i• w to of CIA' Are R
IlM1A of CIA'q TO N~OAr A? , MAIN.
I ! n .
i •Sf I rN Nf~ I r i N CUT Aie RU/Ifd Mlire 7x11 eLp.
j ! J 71 niulr r orw
9 f /a/ K Ul.6+Ll titi20
_I
I urn Ia ,
i i....,.,..,.,r
11 P 26 I NI ZOO ov"s
.,t ~ ~'OlLLripll111.. n 7.IJ.' I ry.., 11 rr0•. Ar,Or
1~ ! S 'll ' 0 N N E R
f 261
41_klWf14g 23- . ul0%1, 4 I uaor
' 1 1} FIRST STATE SANK OF OEN10k
{ 255. 63' P'P 101 SOUTH LOCUST
DENTONr TEXAS 76201
PO-JJ IONINO 18171 382-5421
••.•a+l1+1 ceytlt
I
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DETAILED PLAN
1. Statement of Intent of Owner:
To develop land into a single family residential community.
2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guide:
Low intensity area
3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed District:
7.381 acres
'F
6. Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tract:
f
Total Proposed Acreage
a. Single Family Detached 7.381
b. Single Family Attached (townhouses, cluster, etc.)
E
co Attached Patio/Garden/Zero Lot Line
d. Duple:
e. Multi-Family
E f. Office
g. Neighborhood Service
l
h. General Retail
1. Commercial
Light Industrial
k. Heavy Industrial
11 Other (specify)
i
I
R
i
k
d
t~
4
Development Standards
Page 2
5. Off-Site Information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets,
drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements.
(Shown on detailed plan.)
6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lute,
loading areas, access points. (Shown on detailed plan.)
Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.)
52 Wee
7. Buildingas
a. Approximate location. (Show on detailed plan.)
b. Maximum heightt
c. Minimum setbackst (Show on detailed plan.)
d. Maximum gross floor atea (square feet) for nouresidentialt
I
i
8, Residential Subdivisions
a. Number of units per acre (deusity)t
S.ls
b. Number and location of lout (Show on detailed plan.)
38
co Minimum site, width and depth of lotsi (Shove on detailed plan.)
60 ft. vide and 100 ft deep
d, rtnimum front, side and rear yard setbackas (Shown on detailed plan.) .
SF-7 setbacks as per City of Denton Zoning Ordinance _
1
L__J
a
t
R
Development Standards
Page 3
9. Water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks,
ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or major drainage facilities
and improvements. (Shown oa detailed plan.)
10. Utilities - location of a1L major sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities.
(5hown on detailed plan.) 16 ft utility easement on the front of each lot and an
8 ft. easement on tFc back of each lot
11. Location of trees 3" in diameter - six (6) feet from ground level.
(Shown on detailed plan.)
' 12. open Space - location and site of greenbelts, parks, common and recreational areas.
(Shown on concept or detailed plan.)
13. Screening - location, type and site of all fences, berms or screening features.
(Shows on concept or detailed plan.)
i
To be provided b individual lot owners
14, Development Schedule (concept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will
be submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of
development. AU dates should indicate month and year.
N/A
i
ADDIT1001 REQUIREMENTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN
15. Landscaping plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used. _
Lots will be individually landscaped by builder or homeowner
i
k
I
LL
9
Development Standards
Page 4
16. Signs - show location, type and size on detailed plan] otherwise, signs must
conform to Article 17 of the Zoning Ordinance.
III
17. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.)
19. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A
(Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances.
(A separate plat is required.)
19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of
construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month
and year.
Phase I - Lots 20-34 Block B and Lots 25-26 Block A construction to be in
within nine months of the adoption of the ordinance
i Phase IS Lots 27-47, Block A to brine after the comvletion_of Phase I
i Utility construction to provide Lots 27-47, Block A suet be completed prior to
i the issuance of an buildicut permits
0755•
I
j
.
4
ND. -L4k2Z
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE C
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENUIX TO THE
T
APPLS HE CITY CF DENTON, TEXAS BY OMDINANCE N0. CODE OF ORDINANCES Or
LANEIEAPPRTo 15.9 ACS or AND TEN OXIMATELYRE1,050 LFEETLWESTDor THLe50UTHNSIDE O/AUDNA
f
PANTICULARLY DESCRIBED r LOOP 261 AND
CLASSIFICATION FROM HfNE.N, TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANCED I9 MORE
DESIGNATION TO PLANNEDUDLVELL 'A' Dp ;RICT CLASSIFICATION ZONING 1J OPM DfSIGNATIONI AND PROVIDING D CLASSIFICATION%AND USE
USE FOR AN LffECTIVt DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THC CITY OF VINTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I_
That the sonlnq classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-wit,
All that certain tract or parcel of tand situated In the M.E.P a
! P.M.N. Company SUIVey, Abstract No, v21y
Denton, Teaao, being III of + Certain 16,064 C, C1soro of less, edge co4 Clemontefonibthe 129th day ofaDecemberF' Florena to Philip olume
, 1970,
E 61), Page 191, Deed Recardf of said County* recorned In Volume
described As follows: Y, and being more fully
BEGINNING at a found steel pin at the northeast darner of sa
16.084 acts tract in Auara Lanes id
THENCE south 043J' west pass At 21,61 rest o steel pin on the
south boundary line of Auara Lane and continuing with a tence a
total distance of 1171.91 (eft to an lgon pin and (once corners
THINCI north 19.221)7' west with uia (once a distance of 310.79
feet to an icon pin and tenC4 corner at the southwest corner of
said 16.014 edge tracts
THENCI north 0'24134' east with the west boundary line of said
!trot along and near a tense a distance of 2)0.24 teat to a fence
corner analog
tracteand with042fonce a distance of 24152 Ever to A 94MCO Angieod
THINCI north 0434'38' east with a (onto and the west bounaary line
of said trace ass at 461036 feet s steel pin on the south
boundary llns of Audge Lane and Cuntinuing a tutal distance at
413.70 feet to in Iran pin at the northwest corner of said tract
1 II In Auara Lanes
i THINCI south 49'46117' east In Audra Lane a distance of $11,10
(Oft tO
lane thsrhebioint of beginning and Containing 16.0114 adgas of
net of 11.1020 Act*$ of 4j nee locales within Audio Lane, issuing r
Is hereby changed troy Agricultural 'A'
and Use designation to Planned Develapuent ~'PD'rClassificationl+ o
Use deslgn4tidn under the comprehensive .,oning orainante of the
City of Denton, TOX48,
BECT~I t
that prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy tot the
use of any building within the planned development dtotglet, the
following condition! shall be met,
1-1684/WtSTON HOMtS, (NC,/PAGO ONO
r
1. Specific Bite plan approval is required for Ali multi-family
development.
1. MaAimum height of multl-tsmily structures shall ue limited to
two 1!1 Stories.
1. Single family Isr-7, land development standaros, except for lut
2120, shall apply to the 6,000 square toot single family lots
area of this development.
4. That electrical servicts shall De undeegeound except tot major
transmission lines.
SECTION III.
That the development of the property inall be in substantial
ccmplian.e with the site plan attacned hereto and made a part
hateof for all purposes.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, TeAU, adopted the 14th
day of January, 19690 as an Appendix to the Code of ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, de, and the
same is hetsoy amended to snow such change in District Classifi-
cation and Use subject to the above Conditions and specifications,
SECTION IV,
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereOy
tinds that such chanyt is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpuse of promoting the general veltate of the city ut
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character Of the district and for Its peculiar
suitability or pacticular usae, and with a view to cuusetvlnq the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, ono encoueaging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
city of Denton, Texas, and its citlsens.
SECTION V,
That this ordinance shall be In full fates and effect
immediately after its passage and appfdvatr the regJited public
hearings having hetstofore coon held by the Planning and toning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPAOVED this tna / cay of .1914.
iE
o uT or DEN oN, TExAS
i ATTf9Tr
1 !
CKAALtJ1T5'AL,L,9N* CITY c
CITY Of DINTON, TEXAS
j APPROVED AS TO LEGAL rORMr
JOE D, NOARIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Or DINTON, TEXAS
e r r
9-16111wtSTON NOME9, INC./PAGE ONE
LJ
t
y.
.
LC~•- J!
e
f
1
• wSNO• ,~4C
Jr,4
T
, V N ! I644KV I I t ~ (
WCNOV , IANC 4
M r A
j
L
X41
2-1080 VIST011 SOVES, INC.
E
I
1
}
Y
n
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 11, 1989
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, January 11, 1989, at
5:00 p.m.. in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Judd Holt, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock,
William Kamman, Etha Kiker, and Fran Morgan
Absent: Euline Brock
Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for
Planning and Development; Elizabeth Evans, Planning
Administrator; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Owen Yost,
Urban Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney;
Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Renee Baker, Civil
Engineer; and Donna Baker, Secretary
Vice-Chairman Judd Holt called the meeting to order.
1. Public Hearings
A. 7-88-019, Consider making a recommendation on the
petition of First State Bank requesting an amendment to
Planned Development-83 and approval of a detailed plan.
The property is currently zoned for two-family and
multi-family land uses and is more fully described as
Lots 25, 289 and 27 of Block A, and Lots 20-34 of Block
a of the Audra Meadows Addition. The property is
located on the east and west sides of Bayfield Drive
and on the south side of Brittany Drive. If approved,
the property may be utilized for single family
residential lots with a minimum of 6,000 square feet'.
Mr. Holt stated that he had a conflict of interest with
this case and left the meeting. Mr. Kamman took the
chair temporarily.
Nine notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; one reply form was received in favor and none
were received in opposition.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carsor, stated this is an amendment
to PD-83 to allow the development of single family
detached lots of 6,000 square feet. This would allow
for 6.15 units per acre, She stated that in 1984, the
City Council approved a planned development on 16.8
acres, including this property, for single family
detached on 6,000 square foot lots, duplexes on 6,000
square foot lots, and multi-family restricted, In
1988, the Commission approved a replat of the duplex
section to create separate lots fur each side of the
duplex. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
f
I
Ps2 Minutes
Jaruar,v 11, 1989
I Page 2
i
approval of an amendment to permit the development of
Fifty-four (54) lots for zero lot line development and
two 6,000 square feet lots for single family detached 1
use: however, the petitioner requested the case be l
withdrawn from the June 7, 1988 City Council agenda,
Ms. Carson continued that in October of 1988, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval
of a detailed plan to allow the development of resi-
dences on 6,000 square foot lots. The proposal in-
cluded lots 15, 26, and 27 of Block A and Lots 20-34
and Lots 36 to 38 of Block B of the Audra Meadows
Addition, The petitioner requested that the case be
withdrawn from the December 13, 1988 City Council
M agenda due to an ownership question over Lots 36-38 of
Block 8 of the Audra Meadows Addition,
Ms. Carson stated that the property is located in a
I 1
low intenoity area. The area is 51 percent under the I
intensity standard based on existing land use and 2
percent over the intensity based on existing zoning
based on the Denton Development Guide.
She said low intensity areas are the primary housing
1 areas of the City. The amendment would result in an
increase in the single family detached housing stock
In the City. She added that the proposed lots are
approximately 6,000 square feet and are compatible with
the adjacent lots In the Audra Meadows subdivision.
PETITIONER: Bill Stuart asked the Commission to
approve the case,
IN FAVOR: None Present
OPPOSED: None Present
RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Carson stated that staff
recommended approval with the condition that all
buildings meet the minimum standards for the single
family-7 zoning district, according to Appendix B,
Zoning, of the Code of 0-d1nances except the minimum
lot area shall be 6,000 square feet.
i ! REBUTTAL: None Offered.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
f r~
E '
PSZ Minutes
January 17, 1989
Page 3
N: Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
with the condition stated by staff. Seconded
by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (4-0). J
Mr. Holt returned to the meeting. 11
B. X8-022. Consider making a recommendation on the
petition of Gerald Brooks requesting a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) zoning district to the
general retail (GR) zoning district on approximately
three (3) acres of land located on U.S. Highway 380 and
approximately 2.100 feet west of Trinity Road. The
property is more fully described in the Moreau Forrest
Survey, Abstract No. 417. If approved, the property
may be utilized for any purpose in the general retail
zoning classification.
Eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; two reply forms were received in favor and one
was received in opposition.
I
STAFF RED: Ms. Carson stated that this site is
adjacent and north of property owned by RMB Realty,
Inc. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
denial of a zoning request on August 31, 1988 for a
change in zoning from agricultural (A) to light
industrial (LI), {
Ms. Carson said on November 30, 1989 the Commission
postponed action on this request sending review of the
boundaries of the moderate node at U.S. Highway 380 and
Lakeview Boulevard back to the Appendix A Task Force
for consideration.
The property is currently located in a moderate
intensity area approved by the City Council between the !
Intersections of proposed Lakeview Boulevard, Trinity
Road, and U.S. Highway 380. The moderate intensity
area is 13 percent under tha intensity standard based
on current land use and 29 percent under the standard
based on existing zoning.
Ms. Carson stated that according to the Development
Plan, a specific development should only make use of
a proportionate share of intensity allocated to the
intensity area. If a request violates the general
policy, a determination must be made whether there
are planning considerations that would warrant a
disproportionate allocation of intensity. She said
i
• I
I i
f j
i
3 ~ 1
.
(Mal ling List
ase Z-88-019
Ralph P. Gutierrez
1019 Brittany Dr. J!
Denton, TX 76205
James J. Coley Jr.
909 Brittany Dr.
Denton, TX 76205
Alborn Corporation
4906 DeLoache
Dallas, TX 75220
Hunter Homes Inc.
c/o Stephen E. Reese
620 W. Hickory
Denr.on, TX 76=01
J.R.K. Inc
4906 Loche
Dallas, TX 75220
I
{ Jimmie Chester Sparks
2015 Audra Lane
1 Denton, TX 76201
1
j Strata Partners III
P.O. Box 82
Denton, TX 76202
Eugenia P. Rayzor
1204 W. University 11405
i Denton, TX 76201
Texas American Bank
P.O. Box 430
McKinney, TX 75069
I
P ~ I
f
E
S
i
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED DETAILED PLAN FOR CERTAIN LOTS LOCATED
WITHIN BLOCK A AND B OF THE AUDRA MEADOWS ADDITION, BEING A PORTION
OF THE 16 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 84-117 (PD-83), PROVIDING FOR
A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 84-117, the City Council approved
a planned development district (PD-83) and site plan for 16 acres
of land located on the south side of Audra Lane, approximately
1,050 feet west of Loop 288, as more particularly described therein
(presently platted as the Audra Meadows Addition); and
WHEREAS, the owner has applied for approval of a revised
detailed plan for a portion of the district to provide for a change
of the designated two-family and multi-family use for Lots 25, 260
and 27 of Block A, and lots 20 through 34 of Block B of the Audra
Meadows Addition, to single-family use on lots of a minimum size
of 6,000 square feet; and
i
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval of the amended detailed plan; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That in accordance with article 11 of Appendix B -
Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, the amended detailed plan shown
in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated by reference is
approved for the specified lots located in PD-83, said lots being
described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, so that hereafter the property shall be constructed,
used, and maintained in accordance with the detailed plan herein
approved.
SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached
to Ordinance No. 84-117, showing the amendment herein made.
d SECTION III. That any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
$2000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
Z-88-019/Page 1
I
I
i
1
v
SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance
to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
I
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
I ~
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i
4
1 1
BY: J
I I
v
I.
j
'I
i
I
2-88-019/Page 2
I
f M1
4gjn ° ' K,
J
S, Z
f, Y 1
EXHIBIT "A"
Lots 25A, 25B, 26a, 26B, 27 Block A, Audra Meadow-1 Addition
Lots 20A, 20B, 21A, 21B, 22A, 22B, 23A, 23B, 24A, 24tH,
25A, 25B, 26A, 26B, 27A, 27B, 28A, 26B, 29A, 29B,
30A, 30B, 31A, 31B, 32A, 32B, 33A, 33B, 34A, 34B
Block B, Audra Meadows Additon
1
I
I' f
f
Z-88-019
a
f
N
+1
L
EXHIBIT "B"
DETAILED PLAN FOR AUDRA MEADOWS, CONSISTING OF:
1. Detailed Plan (1 page); and 1
2. Development Standards (4 pages).
I
{
I ~
~ r
I
I
j
f1
r
Z-88-019 J~
JI•nr t• sltm IVAN$ A/e(I 1.)1.01
Itl, I.4. F Z p
M. .N)11 W. B.A. .0.. !e•, 10
NING G Ric G7 N C7
RICUL rURAL 10 W,,.fff at
1l I-
9 50.631 I-
- 4'L M L! h •J
,4 UORA = LANE az 1
.er p < IO n
I 1 ) o. i( O a .
1 c I I 1 2" I Q~"`7«31 L Aar„w.rtrl U m u
I I I I ............1. I III 47 .:1 "w•: i• :.rs L9 'K ry i-
f I : I j..........,.Ii.. .lu ` ' vu n.l "l Mall 71
I I I Ir ~)!S wl I I JI f1 r"°e•: J• .10 w Q 0 y
i lee .t. I 2 I:......... OI' I
f
i I I !a i u wr,ev 3 N
h e 1 ) + .1...... Z 4L ~j in t
a i, 1 I t, a NI I rl 1IS rl 4rl, rp4 r rrw r-e N O
a ) a
, y 1 ) 1 1 E14 1 L9
MI p
1 . Ur eYY.ml. za ly- N
I L.,.. ....L......• 1. I rw. ,01-^ W
J O d ,IrA x'C' W /ll 0 ro
60
I. r• rto 31 ~ I it I .w. a• rrw
O a'~ ~r
1...........1 C1 r t
is, # 4r:4 a• Y<I N R:
Arr Y
w I 1 I 1 1 11 I I1 12 1 Elysian r r rw h 1- 13 ; e.
.XL
I I! w II r C t o r
I .I h.. 1 1 . I ,1 aiwrl 4 . ~a
sit, I I I j0 7 i f 3] I1= I I~IG<l
e
I...... al I I . 1 m
' ua I I 4 ,,..1~ iNr' 11 ~I Ii :.ee•:. ro 1......1. I I 1 3l If III 49e1 +w.rrv
I«1, 17 I~ toval l
i !1I ` M. Y4
, 11 f wr. ,•r,o~
I ~~I ul~ I I` I 39 Ilt IL 39
I ~ I If
4 e 1 ~ t .1. ~ 1 iN « I ~ 1:ir~+M xlel
3aL' rur„rr rrw
~fi \ I 1 I I SI ~
t IN l..\....I. 1v II¢I s~24 Ilr fl~ O M
1
Z. q271lk ~r,'•rrwer
Irr>♦ al 11 LOTS rS Awn BLOCK A, ERA
i36 is rw LOTS 20-74, BLOCK APr SERKD IY
09611"1 WAILA AMC SrWEA KMLES.
1 CON10Nl LIKS VERI IMTCmq.lrm
7 f I 'I I. rr to n ra.)a" FMN A CITY y OEKTa TO/oSM2NICAL
A r M 1 MAP, OATEO rUllMll 11)4.
/J i II 1 1 2 r
6 li it 312 1! mares r all in ' I S[1 1 rN li 1 S1 >I IA ILOCNS FCFKJTf 1W.L IS Illl,[1 IN
I [1 A KoPIIA rWMlol FDK TMU 74.
~4.•. I ! 1 I. • 1 as 1, I S~ BLOCK 1, , ANn LOTS » AV AAp !11. . ROCK A.
I. I if I r 2p [ 34 11 or it Y,l 9 Lm AP/IMY4L OF FINAL FLAT.
1 mw t 41 IUILOIMI FOMI11 SMALL NOT N EI$=
.....La N, 11, 11 f f ,w, a• rrw ICA LOTS 27 TNU 470 ROCK A, UNIX
all I NICK "St LLLOTSTHAYS iia MIAALLEC, FAAND
IS 1 1 4 Ir fl 33 11 IFr So GOP JOB IATFJCLD DKJA1 MAS K IOMASECC 04
!ir /N4 I I 1 «N• 11 CI 11 ::;•aYir°n CTMCPKIN KSAnT To 1W dTlulCTrof
y. I II I I - OF ttt CITY E41l JI AT M O[vGA 1-
r /I I i 1= =1 • I 11 Arenva ELPEw".
10 32 1 .ra 1
w r WISP 114 THIN " HIM K)Tr1 " fEK7'I`Ef
11t r SI Lr.nr~ r rrn 17ALL R FAro 200 a OY fr TM! D[raOK11
a. u1 I .1... ..,,.1 ,N23 M. wit
y IT I ff t 1' A , I.$ it Aer s re«a" of 1N~1 CIITYY. T~wv Polic POLL AALLSO me
1 u t t 22 Is 5I it 31 dg, Y o 1MSTALLra At ~ TIME. "lop To TT:
t I I IS C I !I 11 All rrw r4ol IM OF 101146 mlyt.
p 1 I! I II ~
411 NS 0 MArEA SERVICES To It 0S1Ca4Co NIP &I
1 II, I I " 1 301" I{ CAT 404 PLAISCC AT tN4C Ma1M.
i If I 21 11 30 11 Air 7> i(KU SCKYICE! TO IS AIIDON4[o SHALL
I.,.. J.....~ If I 1 11 rw, a• rrw III CAT L0 FLA KII MAID TM Ciotti.
*a arv in.
P y $46 1. •...1. 11 20 I `1 Q I 11 oiii„pei i• r1IPi41
• » nlL ~w.ri LLrl._U still yr 1 11 M
0 ?r el?' d2LL2
-to; IMA' a ILIS' J I • w4: i':°e H N E R
I : ' I 25 26 1 I ; „a 4 FIRST STATE BANK OF O£NTON
1' r 21 SOS s ' w ,I.rrIVK
ip_ 1T -w : _ LA1ta p 101 SOUTH LOCUST
n- wn-
253.63' OENTON/ TEXAS 76201
j
i pO-73 ZONING 58171 382-5421
"'e, all col
3.
4
I
I
i
i
I
1
i
1
ME=
TTT=
E
!4 444 1
DATE: 022/21/69
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORIQAT _ 4 64
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council GY
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR 2-88-022
RECOISMENDATION:
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.
SUMMARY:
The proposal is for a change in zoning from agricultural to general
I` retail in a moderate intensity area. The request meets all
applicable Development Plan policies.
i BACKGROUND:
The property to the south and west is owned by R148 Realty, Inc. and
I zoned planned development retail, multi-family and light industrial.
Ift PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Eight reply forms were mailed to priperty owners within 200 feet of
the request.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact.
Res [foil su ted:
Prepared by: L d Y. Harrell
/l. ~ C1 y Manager
Cecile Carson a~9
I Urban Planner
I
Ap roved:
CJ
i rank H. Robbins, AICP
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
114 0970o
I
a
r ~
a~
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-88-022 Meeting Date: February 21, 1989
GENERAL INFORMATION
i
Applicant: Gerald Brooks
1302 Crest Drive
Colleyville, ix. 76034
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in zoning from agricultural (A)
to the general retail (GR) zoning
district
Location and Size: Three (3) acres of land located
approximately 2,100 feet west of r
Trinity Road i
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Agricultural, Residential
South - Agricultural, Planned
Development - 126
East - Agricultural, Residential
West - Agricultural, Vacant
Denton Development Plan: Proposed Moderate Node
I
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: U. S. Highway 380 is a primary major
arterial. Trinity Road is located to
the east and Lakeview Boulevard is
' located to the west of this property.
According to the Subdivision Regula-
tions, access along primary major
arterial is limited.
Utilities: No water or wastewater lines are
located in this area. Service could
be provided either by extending lines
or meeting Subdivision and Land Devel-
opment Regulations for installation of
septic tank and water well.
I
V
I
qy :
(Case Z-88-020
Page Two
SPECIAL INFURMATION (continued)
Frainage: The tract is outside the area of
detailed floodplain Mapping and the
area of the city's Drainage Master
Plan. A drainage study would be
required with platting.
HISTORY
The site is adjacent and north of property owned by RMB Realty, f
Inc. A planned development on 848 acres was created by the City
in October of 1988.
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied a zoning quest for a
change from the agricultural (A) to light industriale (LI) zoning
district on August 31, 1988.
On November 30, 1988 the Commission postponed action on this
request sending review of the boundaries of the moderate node at
U. S. Highway 380 and Lakeview Boulevard.
t
ANALYSIS
i
Fer y is currently located in a moderate intensity area
intersections of proposed Lakeview Boulevard, Trinity
.S. Highway 380. The node has been drawn to incl ude a
angle shapa piece of land outside the boundaries of
h is currently zoned agricultural. The moderate
intensity area is 131 under the intensity standard based on
current land use and 29% under the standard based on existing
zoning.
According to the Development Plan, a specific development should
only make use of a proportionate share of intensity allocated to
the intensity area. If a request violates the general policy, as
this request does, a determination must be made whether there are
planning considerations that would warrant a disproportionate a
allocation of intensity. A review of the criteria to app
disproportionate share of intensity is outlined below in order to
provide a guide for consideration of this moderate intensity area:
1. The location of the proposed develo ment in reference to
ez st ng or ro case u c ac t es suc as streets,
he prop-
water or sewer nes an drainage .ac 1 ties.
erty as rootage on a major arterial as s own on the
proposed Thoroughfare Plan.
i
I
i
I
r
(Case Z-88-022)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continue(l)
The water and wastewater master plan shows majo7during
tion lines following proposed Lakeview Blvd. Twould be required to meet the master drainage ptime of construction and to provide drainage stthe
platting process.
2. The to o ra h of the land in the Tannin area and the
propose evelo~ment. a topograp y in t s area would
allow higher intensity development without significant
changes to the elevation or vegetation in the area. The
property does not have any significant topography that would
be altered by development.
i
3. The land use in the plannin area and surrounding areas. The
area around this property is predominantly vacant an agri-
cultural in nature. Planned development general retail,
f multi-family, and light industrial are located south of this
{ site in the moderate node and the property is adjacent to
existing business along U.S. Highway 380. Screening and
buffering including landscaping and setbacks would be
required between existing and proposed residential uses prior
to developii,ent.
E
4. The allocation, of trip generation intensity in reference to
of er olicies oT_ the Cit-Uent'on such as i e on
0 older ne h or, oo s an s nR a fam y ous na protect
ty
o sous n an the concentration o a artments and
o cc retail s tes. he proposal meets t e poles for a
mo era a ntens y area.
The proposal meets the Development Plan standards and policies
for a disproportionate allocation of intensity.
U.S. Highway 380 is a primary major arterial also identified as
a major entranceway to the City of Denton. A priority of the
City is to beautify the entrances.
The Zoning Ordinance prohibits the development of residential
land uses in a non-residential zoning district; however, the
' development of office (0), neighborhood service (NS), and general
retail (CR) is allowed in a general retail zoning district. The
general retail zoning district permits the property to be used
for a(n) office, bakery, antique store, cleaner, florist,
restaurant or sinilar business uses. The proposed land use would
be compatible with the adjacent zoning to the south.
V
I
(Case Z-88-022)
Page Four
ANALYSIS (continued)
A planned development zoning district provides the City with the
most control in the design of the site; however, the relatively
small size of this tract and the existing ordinance, provisions,
i.e., landscaping and tree preservation, average setback, and
curb cut limitations should provide adequate site control for
general retail land uses.
According to the Development Plan, retail and non-residential
uses are limited to twenty 20 acres or 1/3 of the moderate
node. This 13S acre node would allow 44.5 acres of
commercial/retail land use. Planned development-126 includes 32
acres of planned development retail; therefore, the 3 acres
proposed for retail will not result in a violation of the 1/3
policy.
I
RECOMMENDATION
I
j Planning and Zonin,j Commission recommends approval.
I
I -
1 ALTERNATIVES
i I 1
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. PD-126 Concept Plan
3. Intensity Study #40
I
I
I
2S07a
1
r~
Z88-022
NOIITN
T' /
DLA`OiI1D. s
G4U
\
AAA 1
I 1 ~ ~I 1
1
1 ,
I ~ 1 • 1
~ L. I 1
1 f
1
r'
u.ro w rrn.l•~
..w tiny
•r-, L•r•.. rrr
- 0
w.
. M lYl.'Y ~
y • fir'
<M•NI~ _ .
w
1
_ _ _ OI. 'J .rA. ~f LAM 1IY/1r{yl
1.• 1.•Irrl .IYr SF ` ~ = 4 •
y^
Y.
1 c
KEVIEW
I1.4M0~ ~Vp~•[I~y1 MMO% RRAO co
Iw•11111[~ r KI 1 1••I co
M~ •
•M~Y •w .rte
A wsx ~
A~ IRI.• Ii~• r M
~fA l•: R. K
i
i
LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF DENTON
Intensity area f: 40 Type: MODERATE Intensity trips/Ac 350
Traffic survey zones: 6621A
Boundary Description: North: University Drive
South: North boundary line of tract 1 11 in PD 126
Date: 11/21/88 East: Trinity Road
West: West boundary line of PD 126
LAND USE EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSITY
---1 SF-16 t 10 12,19 100 0 0 0 0 0
SF-IG>16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SF-1>10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M089 HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DUPLEX 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0
NF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
My-10 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 545 4360
. CON/RET 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 20800
OFFICR 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 2450
INDUSTRY 0 0 0 0 0 35.8 0 3759
INSTI'NAL 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 425
PARRS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R/0/SPACE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRANSPORT 0 6.5 0 10.5 0 0 0 0
AGRIC. 0 0 0 5.33 0 0 0 0
VACANT 0 117.43 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 10 135.12 100 15.83 0 101.6 545 31794
INTENSITY CALCULATIONS
(A) Existing Land Use
(1) intensity area total trips 135.12 times 350 47292
(2) Trips allocated to existing land use 100
(3) Trips allocated to vacant lands 117.43 times 350 41101
(4) Estimated unallocated intensity trips (1)minus (2)+(3) 6092
(S) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 87
N N N.....................................................
~ (6) Current zoning
I1) Intensity area total trips 135.11 times 350 47292
(2) Trips allocated to existing land use 100
(3) Trips allocated to current zoning (Incl. planned developsents) 31794
(4) Trips allocated to vacant lands not zoned plus Win. sonias 1866
(5) Estimated unallocated Intensity trips (1)sinus(2)+(3)4(4 13533
(6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated 71
I
I
r"
PSI' Minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 3
Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
with the condition stated by staff. Seconded
by Mr. Enge)brecht and unanimously carried (4-0).
Mr. Holt returned to the meeting.
B. Z-88-022. Consider making a recommendation on the
petition of Gerald Brooks requesting a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) zoning district to the
general retail (GR) zoning district on approximately
three (3) acres of land located on U.S. Highway 380 and
approximately 2,100 feet west of Trinity Road. The
property is more fully described in the Moreau Forrest
Survey, Abstract No. 417. If approved, the property
may be utilized for any purpose in the general retail
zoning classification.
Eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; two reply forms were received in favor and one
was received in opposition.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that this site is
adjacent and north of property owned by RMB Realty,
Inc. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
denial of a zoning request on August 31, 1988 for a
change in zoning from agricultural (A) to light
industrial (LI).
Ms. Carson said on November 30, 1988 the Commission
postponed action on this request sending review of the
boundaries of the moderate node at U.S. Highway 380 and
Lakeview Boulevard back to the Appendix A Task Force
for consideration.
The property is currently located in a moderate
_ intensity area approved by the City Council between the
intersections of proposed Lakeview Boulevard, Trinity
Road, and U.S. Highway 380. The moderate intensity
area is 13 percent under the intensity standard based
on current land use and 29 percent under the standard
based on existing zoning.
Ms. Carson stated that according to the Development
Plan, a specific development should only make use of
1 a proportionate share of intensity allocated to the
intensity area. If a request violates the general
policy, a determination must be made whether there
are planning considerations that would warrant a
disproportionate allocation of intensity. She said
1
J
P&Z Minutes
January 11, 1969
Page 4
that a review of the criteria to approve a dispro-
portionate share of intensity is considered for this
moderate intcrisity area. The four criteria are:
1. The location of the proposed development in
reference to existing or proposed Du is
facilitiFs. su w as streets. water or sewer
lines, and drainage facilitigg. The
property has frontage on a major arterial
as shown on the proposed Thoroughfare Plan.
The water and wastewater master plan shows
major distribution lines following proposed
Lakeview Boulevard. The development would
be required to meet the master drainage
studies during the platting process.
I
2. The topaaraphv of the land in the planning
area and the proposed development. The
topography in this area would allow higher
intensity development without significant
changes to the elevation or vegetation in
the area. The property does not have any
significant topography that would be
altered by development.
3. the and use in the planning area and surrounding
areas. The area around this property is
predominantly vacant and agricultural in nature.
Planned development general retail, multi-family,
and light industrial are located south of this
site in the moderate node and the property is
adjacent to existing business along U.S. Highway
380. Screening and buffering including i
landscaping and setbacks would be required
between existing and proposed residential uses
prior to development,
4. The allocation of trip_ggneration intensity
in reference to other policies of the City
of Denton Such as the protection of oider_
1 neighborhoods and single family housing.
diversity of housing and the concentration
of apartments and office/retail sites. The
proposal meets the policies for a moderate
intensity area.
Ms. Carson stated that the proposal meets the
Development Plan standards and policies for a
disproportionate allocation of intensity.
I
j
P&Z Minutes
January it, 1989
Page 5 1
Ms. Carson concluded that a planned development toning r
district provides the City with the most control in the
design of the site: however, the relatively small size i
of the tract and the existing ordinances, provisions,
i.e., landscaping and tree preservation, average
setback, and curb cut limitations should provide
adequate site control for general retail land uses.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if as the triangle develops if
more curb cuts would be required. Ms. Carson stated
that the ordinance limits the number of access points
on an arterial.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the new sign ordinance would
be applicable when this site is developed. Ms. Carson
said
yes.
PETITIONER: Morelle Miller, 1811 Bolivar Denton,
stated that the owners did not intend to develop the
area but intended to sell it instead. She said that
the property is useful and the owners would like to
sell it.
I
IN FAVOR: Gerald Brooks, 2125 Westwood Terrace
Grapevine, stated that he and his brother bought the
property twenty years ago for investment purposes and i
felt that the area should be zoned in accordance with
adjacent properties. He said that the only useful
purpose if for commercial or general retail use. He
asked the Commission to approve the zoning change.
OPPOSED: None Present
I
RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Carson stated that staff
recommended approval.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked why the petitioners weren't
asking for a planned development. Ms. Carson stated
that with a planned development, a detailed plan
identifies the proposed use and since the petitioners
plan to sell the property, there is no use proposed.
1 REBUTTAL: None Offered
Chair declared public hearing closed.
t
DECISION: Mr, Kamman moved to recommend approval of
Z-88-022. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock.
I
I
I
.I
t
P&Z Minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 6
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the property would be required
to have sidewalks. Ms, Carson said yes, when the
property is platted, improvements would be required at
that time.
Vice-Chairman Holt called a vote on the motion and it
carried unanimously (5-0).
C. Z-88-024. Consider making a recommendation on the
petition of the City of Denton requesting a change in
zoning from the general retail (GR) and office zoning
district to the two-family (2-F), multi-family-1 (MF-
1), and multi-family restricted (MF-R) zoning districts
on property east of Teasley Lane, south of I-35 and
north and west of Hollyhill.
t 150 notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; six reply forms were received in favor and four
were received in opposition.
STAFF REPORT; Ms. Carson stated that in the 1960's,
this property was zoned office and general retail as
part of the Southridge development. However, early in
the construction process, the developer determined that
residential uses were more appropriate for the area.
In 1985, the City of Denton approved an ordinance
partially eliminating cumulative zoning; therefore, the
residential uses in non-residential districts became
legal nonconforming land uses on December 31, 1988.
She said the City has initiated a rezoning of the
property to the existing use and the vacant lots would
be rezoned to meet the adjacent properties zoning. She
added that no new construction is proposed at this
time.
Ms. Carson continued that the property is located in a
low intensity area and the intensity, based on existing
land use, will not change since the zoning request is
based on existing uses, The intensity based on the
zoning will be slightly reduced based on some vacant
lots in the proposed two-family area.
PJ~ Ms. Carson stated that property owners have had diffi-
culty with securing loans and selling their property,
due to the zoning, this would no longer be a problem if
the zoning is changed. She concluded that the purpose
of the rezoning is to protect the existing
neighborhood.
E
i
I
i J
I
1
Mailing List
Case Z-88-022
Garden Thrush
Joint Venture
3700 Forums Or. Ste. 200
Flower Mound, TX 75028
Morris E. Sloan
4332 Aspen Dr.
Irving, TX 76062
I Akhtar Khalafi
I Rt. 2 Box 6120
Denton, TX 76201
William B. Stewart
2 Oakbluff St. West
Aubrey, TX 76227
Cindy Lamb
1 Rt. 2 Hwy 380 E.
Denton, TX 76201 ,
A. Bascom
RMB Realty, Inc.
First City Bank Tower
201 Main St. Ste. 2420
I
i
Robert J. Houlioan
a Hal Tehan
4453 Shugarmill
Dallas, TX 75234
i
H.G. Rhine
Movelds Rhine
1801 N. Elm
Denton, TX 76201
I
J
1
eA
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE j
FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO GENERAL RETAIL (GR) ZONING DISTRICT ]1
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR THREE ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 380, 2,100 FEET WEST OF TRINITY
ROAD, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HERRIN; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
--1 WHEREAS, Gerald Brooks has applied for a change in zoning
from agricultural (A) to general retail (GR) zoning district
classification and use designation for three (3) acres of land as
described herein; and
~r
WHEREAS, on January 11, 1989, the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval of the requested change in zoning;
NOW, THEREFORE, A
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the zoning district classification and use
designation of the three (3) acres of land described in Exhibit
"A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is I
hereby changed from agricultural (A) to general retail (GR) zoning
district classification an-i use designation under the comprehensive
zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
6ECTION II. That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton,
Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the
Code of Ordinance3 of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance
No. 69-1, as amended, is further amended to show the change in the
zoning district classification herein approved for the property
herein described.
SECTION Ill, That any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
$2000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
1
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City iJ
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance
J
(1
f
to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
r
ATTESTS
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i
i
BY: iZ ~Y1~ti ~ti
1
1
M
I
C1
2-88-922/Page 2
I
1
EXHIBIT
I, .4. 1. lttllikonj .4e;tstered Public Surveyor, State of Pesos, Licensed
State Land Surveyor, and. County Surveyor for Denton County, do hereby cer-
ttfy that the following field notes truly reoresent a survey, made by me,
on the ground, according to low, Septee;ber 9, 19601
A11 that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land, lying and being situated
to the County of Denton, State of Texae, and being out of the ilorreau
Forrest Su►•veyp Abstract #41?, and being a cart of a certain tract of land
iohtch t;ae.conveyed by iorranty Leeds dated August 22, 1933, from •,trthur
J. Seely and wife., Norma 0. Seely, to Robert Flournoy and wt,fes 6lete
Flournoy, as shown of record in olume 390, rage 306, of the Deed deoerds
of aenton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as followst
B£O1NNIN0 at a steel pin in the Southeasterly Rt;ht-of-wny Line of State
Highway 04, and being Northp 81 degrees, 26 minutes East$ 31109? feet
from., the Northwest Corner of the above mentioned Robert 114 Flournoy trao 1
said point of beginning being at, the Northeast Corner of a certain one (11
adre tract of land, conveyed b Warranty Deed, dated April 22s 19,36, from
Robert Y. Flournoy and wife, 318te Flournoy, to Raloh B. Rom, a single ratan,
as recorded in Volume 4111 Page PSp of the Deed Records of Denton County,
! T~xas1 '
{ THUC,Er Northp 81 digpress, 26 minutes 3•asts along the Southeasterly Bound-
aryy Line of State Highway 04p and the Northwesterly Boundary Line of the
Robert ro Flournoy tract, 333.56 foot, to a steel piny for corner!
THEN091 Soutlls and parallel with the fast Boundary line 'of the coot men-
tlonsd one (1 core tract, 282.45 feet to a steel pin for corner in an
East and *eat fenoe line, saao being tko South Boundary line of the 32bert
1. Flournoy tract of land) 1
THsNCEt Northp 87 degresss 31 minutes •est, along the South Boundary Line ~
of sold tracts some being a fence lines S??.39 jest, to a an, calf inch
pipes said pipe beta,p fifteen-hundredths (415) of afoot rant of the South•
east Corner of a ratlroad crosstio fence corner coati said corner betr:g
the Southeast Corner of the post montione1' one (1) acre tract of land!
ThS.YC£t Yo rthp along the East Boundary Line of the past mentioned one
acre tract of land, 1700,19 Teets to-point of beginnings and,oontaining In
all., three 3) cores of land.
se,)tember, A. D.,
WSW under ray bond and seal, this, the 9th day of
3 SIONELI 0. riIIIkth
3e?tat#r#d Public surutyo r
state of Texas
Ltcsnsed State Land Surveyor
2-88-022 b
County Surveyor for Denton
1 of 1 County
,
i
1
i
r
i
i
I
I ~
1
i ,
i
{1
_ I
I +
d a
r
DAT'Et 02/21/89
L
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
1 111 ~
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR Z-88-024
i
RECOHMENDATIONt
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.
SUMMARY:
i
~ The change in zoning is to existing land uses or the uses on the
adjacent tract if the tract is vacant. The change would help to
i ensure neighborhood preservation.
Due to a question in the legal description of Block 1 of the
Southridge Center Addition, the section between Teasley Lane and
Hestminister Drive and north of Loa:donderry Lane will be removed
from consideration and resubmitted to the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
BACKGROUND:
The property was zoned office and general retail in the 1960's with
the development of Southridge. In 1985; the City Council adopted an
ordinance that ended the cumulative nature of zoning in Denton,
i.e., residential structures cannot be built in non-residential
zoning districts.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMFNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
One hundred and twenty-three (123) property owners within the
request and within 200 feet were notified.
FISCAL IMPACTS
No impact.
Re ctful y s tted:
Prepared by: yd V. Harrell
'I { f b &hao~~/ ty Manager
CCe le Carson
Urban Planner I
Appr, s r
1 n Robbins, AICP
Executive Director for
Planning and Development j
1128e
S
e
e
A
I ~
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
II
To Denton City Council
M Case No.: Z-88-024 Meeting Date: February 21, 1989
Ir GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: City of Denton
Status of Applicant: Municipal Government
Requested Action: A change iii zoning from general
G retail and office to two-family,
{ multi-family-1; and multi-family
restricted zon ng districts.
Location: East of Teasley Lane, south of I-35
and north and west of Hollyhill.
Surrounding Land Use
i and Zoning: North - Office, Retail and I-35
I South - Multi-family and SF-10 and
SF-16
East - SF-10 and SF-16
West - Uffice, Retail and
Multi-family
i
Denton Development Plan: Low Intensity Area
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Property has frontage on Londonderry,
Westminster, Woodbrook, Hollyhtll and
Southridge. All roads are existing.
Utilities: Water, wastewater and electric
utilities are existing and adequate
to serve the area.
Drainage: No additional improvements are
proposed.
i
i
r I
(Case Z-88-024)
Page Two
HISTORY
In the 1960's, the property in question was zoned office and
retail as part of the Southridge development. However, early in
the construction process, the developer determined that
residential uses were more appropriate for the area. In 1985,
the City of Denton approved an ordinance partially eliminating
cumulative zoning; therefore, the residential uses in
non-residential districts will become legal nonconforming land
uses on December 110 1988.
ANALYSIS
The property is located in a low intensity area. The intensity
based on existing land use will not change since the zoning
request is based on existing uses. The intensity based on
zoning will be slightly reduced based on some vacant lots in the
proposed two-family area.
I
Low intensity areas are the primary residential areas in the
City, and this request is consistent with policies of the
a Development Plan. The neighborhood preservation policy is
another key policy of the Plan. This zoning change supports the
preservation of the existing neighborhood.
I
j RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-88-024
I
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
j
2412a
I
1
~ 1
1
Jr
6A
r ~
I
i
Z 8 8 02 4
4 NoRrM
ALECK YKTA HA Y A S OR.
r d
C ~ ~ wtp
k k r
f
I I ! Sya ~ '
l Y i
- W-01
II aas+roee ~ 7
Voswul
T~lj VA
SCALE NONE OATS /Z 221,68
1
i
i
or~
J
w
u
WWI W r
r '~'11'I'll'I
r ~ 4 II III III
J''I ,,~Il ~ilil
4 w 4 , 1111 X111
fY
'YO 7001MNif100 ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ '
h oc
i
* # • j
I = 0 7~ ~r Ai
0 l 11 vM
t / ~ I :1 11 111
•w~ae{ ~ '110 '17NA1 11, 11,' 111 ~ ~
II
~ I I
N. Q
I • g 'YO Y1IMIIAiO»
. w ! i% J
k t
~ Y ~ bl l~ Y 6!~1
~ r
01
i
i
e.
N
d
1111111!1 1 I1 f~ti \
1!1 l~ lllllilfl.
11
! 1/11'I&G,
111111111 f' 711!1l
410 11111111111111111111 1 f111IITr'
1 11111 I, If 1141'111111 1'1,1111 l 1 1 111 lI 1
I t~
111,~1~,~1f'I!11111; 11yJ11111 11111~11111110I 1 It 11111 ' j
11~1I71171c t 711 Ill! J~! II1f11'f 'I 11lI11~1l1If" 11,111Qy1 1l1111 1 11
11 1111, .111 1 1 11111 fill 7111 l /l~ll J~I 11 11111
"11~ II j111f 11 11111 I I I 111 I1f 11111111! 111 1111! j.
rl I 'I 11 1 111 I ! I !1 I!
fill fll~ 111!1111 11111 l1f
If11111111 lll. I
V 1 n71f 1 Ilf 1111111111 f I✓~1'-111 1111 11
1111{/'11 11
G 1717 77 111111 1! 111 ,111 f1 f4f ~~Y
11 l1f 4 1111 fl rl ll jIl II 1111! !f 1 AI
OJ l ~I1 11 111 1 II I Iff ! 11,1 1' IIIf I1 l1 SI > \ \
I ~ 1 , f t 11 111 ! 1 001 Ito 11 I'll
7! 1 1 it 1 I 1 1 I
' I 1 `1 t I fl 0111 I I fl 100 I ! I r f l r\
fo'~ 1 l1f 'll1 ,I I1 11f 1f 11 1 7 1111 t1j1ll1'f'
oG r/ i f +I 1
11 t l 1 1 11 77 111/ 1 1111 11,f 11
l 1~111'f111 I I
111 111J 1'/ /
A I it 1y 11111 141 lf I'I/I I11lj1,1~1~ 111111 .I'/
S ` 1r1~17111T 1I1II111,111~+.7'flf~lll,~jf 411~f, ,lll~l lllly r
` iJ+ fTfI1T1 +'f1 7177!!!0ff` 1{(+fi1111,If Ilj/fjfjYfI Y1111fr
ff" ~IL,.1cc``
4 ti17'iuY )lllftll~
it 11 1 Ill, 1411111111111 111111 r 1'I ~~rr'll if A ~r
I Ill l 111111x11 1 111111 11111 1111
11171,1 I 1 11 J 11171 11111 t1111 111 If 11
r 11/17111 f l ! 11 1111 111 !f 11 1111111,1}11 1 I f
IIL111r1rl1 f 11 ! 1111 1 1 17111,~1M 1}I
l i f l1l'~7 11 11 111111 I 11! 1 1111/1 11. I Ill 11,1
111TI/1 111 1Q !1 f1 10, l1
ifl rl 1'f 11111111111111111! .Y.tt~q\
111.1111 1 1 1 1f 111111 f 111711 711 I1f / l I' Ir. m
I 1~ 11111 I f+ , f 111111r f1 1111111111111111111111
I ~G 1'1111111111 1 1111111111 II III 1111 1 II P
00 I f I l l l 117 f l 1 ~r
1 111 1
OJ ! W 1 Ir f 1 111111/1/ 111 11 Ij 111!1
Is 71 1 II, / /
' 1 Y 11'1 11111 11111 11 1f I
G 'L 1111 ~1{.fI If 11, It 1 `l elf 111111111 .
r ylj,, 11! 11 ' , l f 11111711, 111 M 1111111 11111
1
OG~ ' 1 ~It 11r111111~) ! 111~~11q111f111111¢ IIrf1f If
It1 1 1111!' ~H. J
l is t 1 If 111177!'111 1 1 11 111117/11
• r l a r 1 1 1 1 1111 r
J 111 1 11 1 111 1 111!1111, 11111111 1 111P. 1 r
/ r
oll 1111 1 1 11
I 1111 1111111111111 111111111+111 1111111
r_ r ~ ~ 1 1111 11'11 1'11111,,,1~j~1,,,111 !l
11 lf • 11 1 7 1 1111 1111,, r
a I I1 11 111 1'I 11 '1 11 1 I 1 11 11 1111 f1I 1 f
ll Il 1 l 1~ 7 111 7 11111 11111111111
r I 1 1 go 1 'I 1 11 I I, 1711 11 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 10 + 1 11 1 1 1' 1 1 1 1 J
I 1 I 11 I L! 1 1 1 1 11
i 71111 '1 11111 y 1 111 11+f1
X111111 1 1~ 4 f 171111, 11 11111 1111111 .,7 I G(;'
ll r'I I'1l!4 111111111 f1'f ll 11111 X111111 1/11111111 X111111'' I
00 1
f ! I I I 1
1 1 1l`!ll11111111l1 !
71 1 I 1111 11171111111111/ 1111
1 11 11111'1 11111 1 111 If
11
I f of, 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 11 I
I~111 I I ! 1111 11 f 11111 f 1111
f t' /!I1 I 1 1 l• 1 11 J 1 1 I! f 411
1 1 'I
r 11 ~ 117x11+4 II~~7 11 LL~1++4 11111 r 1 11 1111 1'1,111111
- I 11 11117117` 7f I~~f~1J11~11 11111111.111 1
1 l
~ I ~lM1 11!10:1 1111111 I7111Mf 11df1 JI Ili l~l lr f,l ll
---3nia0 NOM 00M
'1 rd
I
P&Z Minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 6
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the property would be required
to have sidewalks. Ms. Carson said yes, when the
property 1s platted, improvements would be required at
that tine.
Vice-Chairman Holt called a vote on the motion and it
carried unanimously (5-0).
C. Z-88-024. Consider making a recommendation on the
petition of the City of Denton requesting a change in
' zoning from the general retail (GR) and office zoning
district to the two-family (2-F), multi-family-1 (MF-
1), and multi-family restricted (MF-R) zoning districts
j on property east of Teasley Lane, south of I-35 and
north and west of Hollyhlll.
i
150 notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; six reply forms were received in favor and four
were received in opposition.
STAFF REPORT; Ms. Carson stated that in the 1980'&,
this property was zoned office and general retail as
i part of the Southrid3e development. However, early in
i the construction process, the developer determined that
residential uses were more appropriate for the area.
In 1985, the City of Denton approved an ordnance
partially eliminating cumulative zoning; therefore, the
residential uses in non-residential districts became
legal nonconforming land uses on December 31, 1988.
She said the City has initiated a rezoning of tha
property to the existing use and the vacant lots would
be rezoned to meet the adjacent properties zoning. She
added that no new construction is proposed at this
time.
Ms. Carson continued that the property is located In ,a
low intensity area and the intensity, based on existing J
land use, will not change since the zoning request is !I
based on existing uses, The intensity based on the
zoning will be slightly reduced based on some vacant
lots in the proposed two-family area.
j i Ms. Carson stated that property owners have had diffi-
culty with securing loans and selling their property,
due to the zoning, this would no longer be a problem if
the zoning is changed. She concluded that the purpose
of the rezoning is to protect the existing
neighborhood.
t
Psi minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 7
Mr.
the 1960'sranhtzoneddofficeeandtgenearalaretail. Ms.
Carson said yes.
Mr. Holt explained to the audience that the existing
zoning would not allow the property owners to rebuild
their homes in the event that 50 percent or more of
their homes were destroyed. With the zoning change,
rebuilding would be allowed.
Ms. Kiker arrived at :tie meeting.
--1 It FAVOR; George Holladay, 1913 Hollyhill, asked the
Commission to approve the change in zoning.
j Larry Burn^•, 2002 woodbrooke, agreed with Mr. Holladay
and asked the Commission to approve the change in
zoning.
Ken Robinson, 905 Pill Penny Court, stated that he was
in favor of the zoning change.
~pD$ED: None Present.
fUE=MWALM. Ms. Carson stated that staff
recommended approval.
I
Chair declared public hearing closed.
pECISjgj: Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
Z-88-024. Seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously
carried (8-0).
p, Consider making a recommendation on the petition of
W.D. Byrne, representing YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas,
requesting an amendment to an existing Specific Use
Permit in an agricultural zoning district. The
Specific Use Permit allows the property to be used as a
YMCA facility. If approved, the amendment will permit
the alteration of the site plan. The property is
located at the north west corner of Windsor Drive and
Riney Road.
Eighteen notices were ailed
receivedrin favorsandtnone
9 200 feet; one reply
i were received in opposition.
l
I sTAE REPCRI: Me. Carson stated that this is an
amendment to an existing specific use permit. In
August of 1984, the City Council approved a specific
I '
i
L-J
}
Y
p
"y
Ij
Mailing List
Case 2-88-024
Royce Coleman
P.O. Drawer M
Denton, TX 76202
Oscar Blank6nmeyer Jr.
1028 Ridgecrest Ct.
Denton, TX 76205
Rose F. Spicola
i~ 215 Ridgecrest
Denton, TX 76205
f George E. Holladay
1913 Hollyhill
Denton, TX 76205
Pearlene Clawson
212 Hollyhill
Denton, TX 76205
James K. Newman
700 El Paseo
Denton, TX 76205
Alvin Whaley
Box 2981
Denton, TX 76202
I
Clayton J. Streib
k 1913 Stonegate St.
Denton, TX 76205
George D. Fischbeck
210 Hollyhill Dr.
Denton, TX 76205
Delmar L. Lewis
3613 Montecito
Denton, TX 76205
Jeremiah R. Walsh
618 Ridgecrest Circle
I Denton, TX 76205
Deral Wakefield
2303 Birchbark Circle
Denton, TX 76205
yk
k
Z-86-024
Page 2
E.R. Hobbanen E.J. Bendzick
c/o Tenenbaum-Hill
1111 West Mockingbird #757
Dallas, TX 75247
Southwestern Preferred Prop.
c/o Tenenbaum-Hill
1111 West Mockingbird #757
Dallas, TX 75247
Greater Southwest Properties ltd
1810 Teasley Ln.
Denton, TX 76205
Texas Forestridge P/S
c/o Chartwell Mgmt Inc.
1704 Upper Ranch Road
Westlake Village, CA 91362
Jim R. Sybert
P.O. Box 12927 NTSU
Denton, TX 76203
Westminister Garden Partnership
505 Royal Lane
Suite 127
Irving, TX 75063
Dwight Evans
2009 Hollyhill Ln.
Denton, TX 76205
I
Eola P. Tudor
2807 Bell
Lake Kiowa, TX 76240
i
Fred W. Vaughn
306 Holly Hill Dr.
Denton, TX 76205
!
Paul Haywood
- ' 420 S. Carroll Suite E
Denton, Texas 76201
Marry M. Fuller
P.O. Box 22533
TWU Station
Denton, TX 76201
l Larry B.Surns
P.O. Box 6765
San Antonio, TX 78209
! Norrie Rawdon
2000 A Woodbrook
Denton, Tx 76205
Z-88-024
Page 3
.
James L. McNatt
c/o McNatt Properties
319 N. Locust
Denton, TX 76201
Charlcie H. Townson
516 West Oak 811
Denton, TX 76202
Robinson Associates
P.O. Box 50448
Denton, TX 76206
D. Kent Robinson
P.O. Box 50448
Denton, TX 76206
I James R. Rogers
4610 Lynhurst
Dallas, TX 75229
Barbara Jester
c/o Colonial Savings
Drawer 2988
Ft. Worth, TX 76195
Misty Leasing 6 Investment, Inc.
700 Londonderry Ln.
Denton, TX 76201
E. A. Randles
1202 Waddill
McKinney, TX 75069
Olen V. Henderson Jr.
19,6 Kingswood Ct.
Denton, TX 76205
Raj M. Krishnan
1718 W. Oak
Denton, TX 76201
Hollhilla Association LP P/S
c/o Real Estate Tax Service
P.O. Box 832310
Ir~ Richardson, TX 75083
George O. Fletcher Sr.
P.O. Box 473
Odessa, TX 79760
j Leroy J. Theriot
Box 5068 NTSU
Denton, TX 76201
I
a
Y
Y
s
Z-88-024
Page 5
William C. Collins
1929 Highland Pk. Circle
Denton, Tx 76205
John L. Shultz
406 Hollyhill
Denton, TX 76205
Priscilla A. Sanders
408 Hollyhill Ct.
Denton, TX 76205
Joyce Peoples
~ ll 410 Holiyhill Ct.
Denton, TX 76201
Gretchen C. Cumminrjs
412 Hollyhill Dr.
Denton, TX 76201
Vinny Wheeler
Rt. 9 Box 44-B
Denton, TX 76201
Michael D. Lawerence
700 Londonderry
Denton, TX 76201
i I
Claudine Harris Couch
` 2013 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76201
Sarah Pardy Pitzpatric
2017 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76201
i
Gene Jinsiong Cho
2021 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76205
Robert H. Hankins
Box 977
Denton, Tx 76202
Richard W. Stream
2029 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76201
Patte Annette
Straubmueller
905 Chasewood
Denton, TX 76201
i
I
i
u _
Z-88-024
Page 5
William C. Collins
1929 Highland Pk. Circle
Denton, TX 76205
John L. Shultz
406 Hollyhill
Denton, TX 76205
i` Priscilla A. Sanders
408 Hollyhill Ct.
Denton, TX 76205
Joyce Peoples
410 Hollyhill Ct.
Denton, TX 76201
Gretchen C. Cummings
412 Hollyhill Dr.
I Denton, TX 76201
Pinny Wheeler
Rt. 9 Box 44-B
` Denton, TX 76201
I Michael D. Lawerence
III 700 Londonderry
Denton, TX 76201
Claudine Harris Couch
')013 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76201
I
Sarah Pardy Pitzpatric
2017 Pembrooke
I Denton, TX 76201
' Gene Jinsiong Cho
2021 Pembrooke
' Denton, TX 76205
Robert H. Hankins
k Box 977
Denton, TX 76202
Richard W. Stream
2029 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76201
Patte Annette
Straubmueller
905 Chasewood
Denton, TX 76201
9
f
Z-88-024
Page 5
Robert S. Weinberg
909 Chasewood Lane
Denton, TX 76205 J
George F. Bertine 1
913 Chasewood
Denton, TX 76201
Jules P. Brown
1919 Maid Marian
Denton, TX 76201
Frank V. Griggs
i 2008 Woodbrook
Denton, TX 76201
Landy L. Mulkey
2016 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76205
Leslie R. Kreps
2020 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76201
Hollyhills Association
L.P. P/S
{ P.O. Box 832310
Richardson, TX 75083 I
I
Misty Leasing 3 Investment
700 Londonderry Ln.
Denton, TX 78201
Barbra Jester
c/o Colonial Savings
Drawer 2988
Ft. Worth, TX 76195
E. Randles
1202 Waddill
McKinney, TX 75069
James L. McNatt
c/o McNatt Properties
319 N. Locust
Denton, TX 76201
Glenn V. Henderson Jr.
1915 Kingswood Ct.
Denton, TX 76205
Raj M. Krishnan
1718 W. Oak j
Denton, TX 76201
I[
f
! i
2-88-024
Page 6
D. Kent Robinson
P.O. Box 50448
Denton, TX 76206
Charkie H. Townson
516 w. Oak 411
Denton, TX 76202
Robbinson Associates
p.O. Box 50448
Denton, TX 76202
' r James R. Rodgers
f 4610 Lynnhurst
i Dallas, TX 75229
Arthur F. Terry M.D.
2101 Pembrooke
Denton, TX 76205
John R. Piburn
910 Chasewood
Denton, TX 76201
F i 1ST Savings & Loan Assn.
3f Burk Burnatt
P.O. Box 814465
Dallas, TX 75381
1 John H. Cable
1807 Stonegate Dr.
Denton, TX 76205
E. J. Curry
j 109 Hollyhill Rd.
Denton, TX 76205 j
Jim Josephin 6ezdek {
1807 concord 1
Denton, TX 76105 I
I
William B. Stephens
1803 Concord
Denton, TX 76205
Eleanor A. Shawn & Loren Wells
1800 Stonegate
Denton, TX 76205
Robert L. Stevens
I 1806 Stonegate
Denton, TX 76205
William C. Gray
1805 Woodbrook
Denton, TX 76205
1
i
Z-88-024
Page 7
O.L. Sargent
1801 Woodbrook
Denton, TX 76205
Ronald V. Smith
1800 Concord Ln.
Denton, TX 76205
Edward W. Mather
1806 Concord Ln.
Denton, TX 76205
Warren A. Bottorff
1807 Southridge Dr.
Denton, TX 76205
David J. Krause
1801 Southridge Dr.
j P.O. Box 1220
Denton, TX 76201
Edward L. Ellis
221 Hollyhill
Denton, TX 76205
James A. Kitchens
1800 Woodbrook
Denton, TX 76205
John D. Clark
1810 Woodbrook
E Denton, TX 76205
Southridge Recreation Club
P.O. Box 742
Denton, TX 76201
I
Edgar E. Robinson
317 Hollyhill
Denton, TX 76205
Apex Leasing Corp.
c/o Charlcie H. To,+nson
516 W. Oak 1111
C---~ Denton, TX 76205
Harvey S. Chou
1727 W. University Dr.
Denton, TX 76205
James W. Horn
1806 Southridge
Denton, TX 16205
4
Z-88-024
Page 8
Joseph Smith
1900 Hollyhill
Denton, TX 76201
Lawerence M. Johnston
1904 Hollyhill Dr.
Denton, TX 76205
Jay A. Smith Jr.
2009 Woodbrook
Denton, TX 76201
George E. Spencer
2005 Woodbrook
Denton, TX 76201
Donald N. Brown
2100 Woodbrook
Denton, TX 76201
George C. Attaway
I 918 Chasewood
Denton, TX 76205
1 John R. Piburn
e 910 Chasewood
Denton, TX 76201
I Aurthur F. Terry MD et ux
2101 Pembrooke
t Denton, TX 7620E
I
Frank V. Griggs
2008 Woodbrook
Denton, TX 76201
Jules P. Brown
1919 Main Marian
Denton, TX 76201
George F. 8eutine
913 Chasewood
Denton, TX 76201
Robert S. Weinberg
909 Chasewood Ln.
Denton, TX 76205
Patti Annette Straubmueller
905 Chasewood
Denton, TX 76201
Richard W. Str( .m
2029 Pembrooke
Denton, Tx 78201
f
4
z-88-024
Page 9
Robert H. Hankins
Box 977
Denton, TX 76201
La Prairie Apts J/V
3861 Interfirst Two
Dallas, TX 75270
La Prairie and Teasley Apts.
c/o Hardin Inc.
507 S. Locust
Denton, TX 76201
La Prairie I & It
C/o S.W. Funding Group Inc.
Attn: Loan SE
3200 Wilcrest Dr. 11280
Exxon Corp.
1 P.O. Box 53
Houston, TX 77001
Les Schachar MD
P.O. Box 833
Gainesville, TX 76240
h
E William C. Collins Trust
1929 Highland Pk Cir.
Denton, TX 76205
h
Synod of Texas Presbyterian
920 I-35E
Denton, TX 76205
Carl A. Leupold et al
3035 Powers Av.
Jacksonville, FL 32207
Texas Forrestridge P/S
C/o Chartwell Mgmt. Inc.
1704 upper Ranch Rd.
Westlake Village, CA 91362
j~ William R. Phillips
f 1300 Ridgecrest
L Denton, TX 76201
JBG J/V
{ 1807 histminster Dr.
Denton, TX 76205
Moore Business Forms Inc.
c/o Ducharme, McMillen b Assoc.
10940 Laureate, Suite 8420
San Antonio, TX 78249
r
2-88-024
Page 10
Raymond L. Abbott
1714 Teasley Ln.
Denton, TX 76201
1st Savings and Loan Assn.
of Burk Burnett
P.O. Box 814465
Dallas, TX 75381
F.R. Boydston
P.O. Box 1821
Denton, TX 76202
W.B. Rummell
Box 22658
TWU Station
Denton, TX 76204
Greater S.W. Properties
c/o Tennenbaum Hill Assoc. Inc.
1111 West Mockingbird Ln.
Suite 170
Teasley Square Shopping Cntr.
c/o Commercial Consulting Co.
206 Elm St. 104
Lewisville, TX 75067
i
i
l
I
i
I
Ir
V I
i
5
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FCR A CHANGE
FROM OFFICE DISTRICT (0) TO TWO-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT (2-F)
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR BLACK 2, LOTS 1-22 OF THE
SOUTHRIDGE ADDITION AND FOR BLACK 4, LOTS lA, 1B AND 1C OF THE
SOUTHRIDGE CENTER ADDITION; PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM GENERAL
RETAIL DISTRICT (GR) TO MULTI-FAMILY Ui'ELLING DISTRICT-1 (MF-1)
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR BLACK 2, LOT 3 OF THE
SOUTHRIDGE CENTER ADDITION; PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM OFFICE
DISTRICT (0) TO MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING RESTRICTED DISTRICT (MF-R)
1 'JLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR BLACK 3, LOTS 1-6, AND BLACK
4R, LOTS 1-11 OF THE SOUTHRIDGE CENTER ADDITION; PROVIDING FOR A
CHANGE FROM OFFICE DISTRICT (O) TO MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING-1 DISTRICT
(MF-1) CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE HOLLYHILLS
ADDITION AND THE 3.809 ACRES OF LAND L40CATED IN THE JOHN MCGOWAN
j SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 797, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000.00 FOR 1
VIOLATIONS THEREOF! AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has petitioned for changes in the
district zoning classifications for the properties herein
described; and
I WHEREAS, on January 11 , 19891 the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval of the requested changes in zoning; J
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSs J
SECTION 1. That the zoning district classification and use
designation of Block 2, Lots 1-11 of the Southridge Addition, as
recorded in Volume 15, Page 42, of the Plat Records of Denton
County, Texas, and Block 21 Lots 12-22 of the Southridge Addition,
as recorded in Volume 161 Page 30 of the Plat Records of Denton
County, Texas, are hereby changed from office District (0) to Two-
Family Dwelling District (2-F) classification and use designation
under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton,
Texas.
1 ~
SECTION III That the zoning district classification and use
designation of Block 2, Lot 3 of the Southridge Center Addition,
as recorded in volume 6, Page 30 of the Plat Records of Denton
County, Texas, is hereby changed from General Retail District (GR)
to Multi-Family Dwelling District (MF-1) classification and use
I
I
1
I
designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas.
k=TION 131, That the zoning district classification and use
designation of Block 3, Lots 1-6, as recorded in Volume 6, Page 300
of the Plat Records of Denton County, Texas, and Block 4R, Lots
1-11 of the Southridge Center Addition, as recorded in Volume 6,
Page 42, of the Plat Records of Denton County, Texas, are hereby
changed from Office District (0) to Multi-Family Restricted
District (MF-R) classification and use designation under the
comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION IV. That the zoning district classification and use
designation of Block 4, Lots 1A, 180 and 1C of the Southridge
Center Addition, as recorded in Volume 14, Page 8, of the Plat
Records of Denton County, Texas, are hereby changed from office
District (0) to Two-Family District (2-F) classification and use
designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas.
I
SECTION V. That the zoning district classification and use j
designation of the property included in the Nollyhills Addition as 1
recorded in Volume 10, Page 13, of the Plat Records of Denton
County, Texas, are hereby changed from Office District (0) to i
Multi-Family Dwelling District-1 (MF-1) classification and use
designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas. ,
i
SECTION VI. That the zoning district classification and use
designation of the 3.809 acres of land described in Exhibit "A", J
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby
changed from Office District (0) to Multi-Family Dwelling District-
1 (MF-1) classification and use designation under the comprehensive
zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, j
SECTION VII. That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton,
Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the
Code of Ordinances of the city of Denton, Texas, under ordinance
No. 69-1, as amended, is further amended to show the change in the
zoning district classification herein approved for the property
herein described.
SECTION VIII. That any person violating aiq provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
1 $2000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
I shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
I
I
1
i !
val.
2
SECTION IX. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance
to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
ATTEST,
JENNIFER WALTERS? CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
i DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: h
I
89-49
1
i
I
l
k
w.
H Ng
k
h
j
1
I
i
~ I
I
K
'i
4 y
DATE: 02/21/89
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
f O.
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyo V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTIO14 OF AN ORDINANCE FOR 2-88-025
RECOMMENDATION:
I
I
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.
SUMMARY: 1J
The amendment will permit the relocation of the proposed parking lot
j to the western boundary of the tract and extend the deadline for
landscaping and screening.
I
BACKGROUND?
In 1984 a specific use permit for development of a YMCA facility was
approved by the City. The Council amended the S.U.Y. In 1987 to
extend the time for development and to requite additional parking.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
I
Eighteen reply forms were mailed to property owners within 200 feet.
! FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact.
Rls~j ttfull su tedr J
Prepared bye Ld V. Harrell
/1 C ty Manager
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
I
AP oveds /
.
P tank H. Robbins, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
09590
I
i
1
i
I
l A
1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMIMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
I
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-88-025 Meeting Late: February 21, 1989
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: W. V. Byrne, representing Y.M.C.A. of
Metropolitan Dallas
601 N. Akard
Dallas, Texas 75201
1
Status of Applicant: Y.M.C.A. Representative
f Requested Action: Amendment of an approved site plan
for a Y.M.C.A. facility
Location and Size: An 8.5 acre tract located at the
northwest corner of Windsor Drive
and Riney Road
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - single family residences;
j agricultural
South - singgle family residences;
SF-10
East - singgle family residences;
SF-7, PD-101, agricultural
West - :forth Lakes Park; agricultural
Denton Development Plan: Low Intensity Area
SPECIAL INFORMATION
I
Transportation: This property has frontage on Windsor
Drive, a secondary arterial, and
Riney Road, designated as a collector
street, The Riney Road frontage of
this property has been improved to
City specifications. A sidewalk on
Riney (toad provides pedestrian access
to the site.
Utilities: Water service is provided by a 16"
line In Windsor Drive and Riney
Road. Sewer service is available by
an 8" line in Windsor Drive. Gas, J
telephone, electric, and cable
services are available to the site.
i
I
L-11 I
s ,
(Case Z-88-025)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (continued)
Drainage: Drainage on this tract falls to th-s
west toward the park. Drainage
improvements will be necessary to
handle drainage into the park.
HISTORY
In August of 1984, the City Council approved a specific use
permit for a Y.M.,,A facility at this site. The ordinance
contained the following conditions:
1. No detached signs, other than a score board, shall be
permitted,
2. A permanently maintained six (6) foot solid wood fence shall
be erected along the north property line.
3. The specific use permit shall expire if the Y,M,C.A.
facility is not completed within three (3) years of the
k effective date of this ordinance.
The City Council approved on amendment to the specific use
permit in December of 1987 to extend the time frame for
development and to allow for the development of an office/
meeting room facility. The city also required additional
parking and landscaping. The request to extend the specific use
permit granted in 1984 was necessary since the facility was not
completed within the required three year time period.
ANALYSIS
' The property is located in a low intensity area according to the
Denton Develo ment Plan. The proposed revision does not Include
any new ac lities an would not impact the intensity o!: the
area.
The amendment proposes three changes to the specific use permit:
(1)the parking lot along the northern boundary has been
relocated to the area adjacent to the existing parking lot; (2)
a landscaping plan has been prepared; and (3) a screening device
is not proposed along the northern boundary.
i
ti
r
(Case Z-88-OZ5)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
The relocation of the parking lot would move the parking further j
from the existing residences on Riney Road and place the parking 1
adjacent to the existing parking lot and North Lakes Park.
However, drainage improvements will be necessary to prevent
additional run-off in to the park.
The specific use permit ordinance approved in 1984 required a k
six (6) foot solid wood fence along the northern property line.
6 The .ondition was revised in 1987 to require a living screen to
be panted along the northern boundary prior to use of the !
parking lot along the northern boundary. This provision is
consistent with the Landscaping and free Preservation Ordinance
which requires a screening device when a nonresidential facility
is constructed adjacent to an existing residence. The
petitioner has requested that the fence requirement not be
continued; however, staff feels that the screening E;;nce is
appropriate and is complimentary to the policy of preserving the
i i existing neighborhood. Since the screening condition of the
1 ordinance has not been met, staff recommends establishing a new
time frame for completion.
A landscaping plan has been submitted with this request. The ;
specific use permit required that 20% of the landscape area,
generally the area between the property line and the existing
parking lot, be landscaped within two years of the effective
date of the ordinance or December 8, 1989. The plan submitted
meets the standards of the the Landscaping and Tree Preservation
Ordinance.
In accordance :ith Article 10 of Appendix B, Zoning, of the Code
of Ordinances, a specific use permit shall be issued only if all
of the following conditions are found:
1. Compatible with aid ac_ent land use. As mentioned previously, I
t e-F - property to the north ~s residential. The relocation of
the parking lot to the west boundary of the site and the
landscaping would not "diminish or impair property values
within the immediate vicinity."
2. Impede normal and orderl development . Development in this
area as not been impeded y tie ex sting Y.M.C.A. facility.
4 3. Public facility _ava~ilabiii_1y. Adequate utilities and access
to road s are available-3ome drainage improvements will be
required with the construction of the new parking lot.
4. Vehicular and pedestrian access. One driveway on Riney Road
provides access to the site. ~h.e building has an automatic
rinklingg system and emergency vehicles have access fro
sm
Rpney koad.
1
J
--•r
1
f~
s~
(Case Z-88-025)
Page Hour
ANALYSIS (continued)
5. Nuisance revention. A screening device along the northern
oun ary will assist in meeting this condition. The 1
ordinance states that measures to control "odor, fumes,
dust, noise, and vibration" should be provided.
6. Effect of lighting. No additional outdoor lighting is
proposed; therefore, no property owners should be adversely
affected.
7. Lands~ca__pp_i_ng_and Screening. The landscape plan meets the
standa o- the Landscaping and Tree Preservation Ordinance. ±
RECOMMENDATION
i
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-88-025
with the following conditions:
~ 1. The fifty (50) additional pa-king spaces must be provided 1
within one year of the effective date of this ordinance.
i
2. A permanently maintained solid living fence, which will
mature over a three (3) year period to a minimum height of
six (6) feet, shall be erected along the north property line
within two years of the effective date of this ordinance. j
3. No ground signs other than an athletic field scoreboard
shall be permitted on the property.
4. The landscaping must be installed within one year of the I
effective date of this ordinance. Landscaping shall be I
Installed in conformance with the Landscaping and Tree
Preservation Ordinance.
5. A permanent physical barrier shall be installed to prevent
vehicle access from this site to North Lakes Park within
three (3) months of the effective date of this ordinance.
ALTERNATIVES
9 1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
3. Deny petition
~ 1 I
i
J
i
_ r1
e
(Case Z-88-025)
Page Five
ATTACHMENTS
F on Map
lan
aping Plan
nce 84-95
nce 87-222
i
1
I
~ i
i
i
I
I
1S84k
LI/ I
J
1
r~
1
Z 88 025__ f
NORTH--
YMCA ADDITION
SITE v n=i
i s
s
f
EXHIBIT
1 taruud tenwx iMrtr.t t M3
► .7{/ {.t 4:11.1,/) ARl ypW
1f1~J<. It' Lr1Lr, wilt b0 /IK/►q
b ./L q Y.•GrFO rocrpt, ~
l ,f.Vp(~.'wLOr N4 Y~:LI./n1 / n
tJAYii.~llr b ..l P /•,•OMO
1YOL.cy 1 / i R d LL./J
/ 1J~♦NL k. I+a em r. ,"4+
H•,.w• .1f.M
♦
i
W 1.O r.w
wood
.r W
1[ •.r
i c
1 ~
w
l---r.~.w lw~ry
0.6^_ LEGEND
ad,
e.'
~ wJ'-••- Vnsw u+ier
1 / r..+a u.etf
' w1lt'tut bm h/wa e
rw.rr-'
Wma
/ lr
•r/..rw... n.t dN {iNMI
I
2-88-025
/ 2 of 3
I
e }
f
;Y
C J .
7f
EXHIBIT "H"
1 ~ I
VlZb10~OR D111y~_
~~f• •r' w.'- - -
OWL
~y
1
JJI o
K 1
(I
II
SUP
1 I ~
I r
3 '
y L =
f ~
.f I
I
iOLir C SCREENF`
I
2-88-025 R C CE, I y u.1)
1 of 3
I
}
i
I
I Q
U
Q
U a
z o~
z
w
0
ii Ear
••m40eD
r
I ~
~~._~I~Illfl~llfflllll,
I I I I I I I I I f I 11~~~~
!_1_l I.~.t1J 111_ .1-A I ~I
Lw'
I I ~ qn IM1 in~x~.-~aepDlrmO~Onnm~ ;'~I\u\\~ ~ !:I\I`~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '
a~enuD~ttu~+e oasomo
~ '.G rmy r
Y •.e M
I
I
,x
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A YMCA FACILITY;
PROVIDING FOR THE REFERENCING OF SUCH USE ON THE ZONING NAP CP
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SA14B WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY
ORDINANCE 440. 69-1, AND AS SAID NAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY
8.590 ACRES OF LAND IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
1
THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the follow-
Ing described property, to-wit:
SITUATED in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being 1
a tract of land in the N. H. Meisenheimer Survey, Abstract No.
810, and being a portion of that Certain tract described as 9.20
acres in 'Exhibit A' in dead'recotded in Volume 885, Page 619 of
the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and said portion being
more fully described as follows:
8EGINNING at an icon rod let for the point of intersection of
the present north line of Windsor Dirve (Old Sanger Road) with
the present wait line of Riney Road, said point of intersection 1
being as defined by R.O.W. acquisition by the City of Denton;
i
THENCE north 89101' west with said north line of Windsor Dirve,
as defined by said R.O.W. acquisition, 144.32 feet to an iron
rod set at the point of intersection of said north line with the
southwesterly line of said 9.20 acres and the northeasterly line
of that certain tract conveyed to the City of Denton AS Tract I j
in deed recorded in Volume 697, Page 207 of said Deed Records;
THENCE north 34050155' west with said common line between said
9.20 acre tract and said City of Canton tract, 1038.36 feet to )
an iron rod in place for the northwest cognac of said 9.20 acre
tract and the northeast corner of said City of Denton Tract Ir
THENCE South 89045130' east with a fence along the common line
between said 9.10 acre tract and that certain 49.622 acre 'Tract
B' in said dead in Volume 665, Page 619 of said Deed Records,
741.46 feet to an icon rod in place for the northeast corner of
-1 said 9.10 acre tract in the west fence line of said Riney Road;
1 THENCE south 0011120' west with said west fence line of Riney
Road and with the east line of said 9.20 acre tract, 609.38 feet
to an iron rod set At the point of intersection of said west
line with the most northerly north line of said city of Denton
R.O.W. acquisition,
TtlENCt north 89055115' west with said most northerly north line
of R.O.W. acquisition, 6.50 feet to an iron rod sat for the most
northerly northwest cornet of said R.O.W. acquisition;
THENCE south 0004125' west with a west line of said R.O.W.
acquisiton and said present west line of Riney Road, 19.10 feet
to the place of beginning and containing 8.590 acres.
c
S-180/W. D. IYRNE/PAGE 1
I
i
which is Classified AS Agricultural 'A' District Classification
Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Denton, Texas is hereby granted for the use of said property a
specific use permit for a YMCA facility, subject to the follow-
ing conditions and restrictions to-wit:
1. No detached signs shall be permitted other than a
scoreboard;
2. A permanently maintained six (6') foot solid wood
fence shall be erected along the north property
lines;
3. This specific use permit shell expire if the YMCA
facility is not completed within three (3) years
from the effmctive date of this ordinance.
4. The development of the property shall be in
substantial compliance with the site plan attached
hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes.
I
SECTION It.
The Zoning Nap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
i
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No.
69-1, shall be referenced to show the property herein described
being granted a specific use permit for the use approved herein.
SECTION 111.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby
finds that such use is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general Relfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
r~ suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving
C the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and
encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum
benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SICTI0N IV.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
i
S-180/M. D. BYRNE/PAGE 2
6 .r r
'1F
Y
r
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof. 7
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1981.
AR 0. TEWAR MAYOR
CI Of DE N, TEXAS
ATTEST.
/ r
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORN:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1
1
f
i
5-180/N. D. BYRNE/PAGE 3
1
1
s
d
i
t
Commission and the City Council of the City Of Denton, Texas,
alter giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1981.
I AR 0. /TE4WAR'TY MA OR
CI 01 DE N, TEXAS
ATTEST:
I
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL POR11:
JOE TY D. Of DENTON, KORRIS, A CTING CITY ATTORNEY
C
1
1 I 'i
► .h
t
I
S-180/B. D. BYRNE/PAGE I
I s '
`r
f
or
E
I u
I
I J
I 1
I
1
Ik
r j
M
i PROPOSED PLOT PLAN
YMC.A.OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS
i ! DENTON BRANCH
I ! - ~ 1
ATHLE IIC FIELDS
z ;
Vl POOL nYM i
- I
y~ IADMIN I ,
, _ _ .
r~ I I~PARKING IIOICARS
# +Ili'IUIII'lu,uul~
i I H+H i' nn.4 to
RINEY ROAD
~ f
• • J
I
{
V
I
2117L
NO. GLLG[~r~"
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC
USE PERMIT FOR A YMCA FACILITY, AS SAID PERMIT APPLIES TO 8.5
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINDSOR DRIVE
AND RINEY ROAD: REPEALING THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT GRANTED BY i
ORDINANCE NO. 84-95: PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM
AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOP: AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORnAINS:
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 84-95, approved August 7,
1984,, grantTng a specific use permit for all or part of the
property herein described, is repealed.
SECTION Ii. That, pursuant to article 10 of Appendix
e-Zoning o the Code of Ordinances, a specific use pe+:mit for a
YMCA facility is granted for the property located at the
northwest corner of Windsor Drive and Riney Road, as is more
particularly described in Exhibit 'A', attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 111. That the property shall be developed, used, and
maintained In accordance with the site plan shown in Exhibit 'B•,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The 1
specific use permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1
1. A parking lot containing fifty additional parking
spaces shall be constructed, in accordance with City
specifications, along the north property line of the f
property, as shown in Exhibit 080, within one year of 1
the effective date of this ordinance.
2. A permanently maintained solid living screen, which
will mature over a three (3) year period to a minimum
height of six feet, shall be erected along the north
boundary of the parking lot prior to making use of
the new.parkfnq lot required in paragraph 1.
i
3. No detached signs, tither than a athletic field score-
board, shall be pe,mltted on the property.
1
4. Within, two years of the effective date of this ordi-
nance, twenty percent of the 'Landscape Areas, as
shown in Exhibit •B•, shall be landscaped. Prior to
installing any landscaping, a landscaping plan
showing the location of the landscaping shall be
submitted to the Building Official.
SECTION N IV. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas,
adopted the 14th day of Janvary, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code
i
i
Of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under ordinance No.
69-1, as amended, is hereby amended to show such change in
District Classification and Use.
SECTION V. That the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, ereby finds that such change is in accordance with a
comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general
welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasanable
consideration, among other things for the character of the
district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses,
and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, pro-
tecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of
land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and
its citizens.
SECTION VI. Any person who shall violate a provision of this
ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the
requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued there-
under, shall- be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not
exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each such person
shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and eveey
day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordt-
nance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such
violations such persons shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION VII. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourr.een (14 aye from the date of its passage, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this
ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle,
the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten
(10) days of the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the VI-4 day of , 1987.
RAY S EN , MAYOR
ATTEST:
M J E L'ER9, CITY SECRETARY
AP OVED AS TO LEGAL PORMs
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY$
i
i
i
i
r~
ti
EXHIBIT "A"
STATE OF TEXAS Xx
COUNTY OF DENTON XX
WHEREAS,7HE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN
M
DALLAS IS EISENHEI ERTSURVEYs ABSTRACT n0. 810,I CITYEOFTOENTONI8,THE CRE N. I H.
OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND BEING ALL OF A CERTAIN (CALLED 8.520 ACRE
TRACT AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED FROM THE BARWORTH CORPORATION TO THE
26THGDAYNOF OCHRITOBSTIERAN198A4SSOCIATIO4 OF
N VOLUME 0 1537,! PAGE LA136,NREAL
PROPERTY RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERN SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 8.590 ACRE
TRACT WHICH IS AN INNER ELL CORNER OF A 0.092 ACRE TRACT
DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO THE CITY OF DENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES AND
RECORDED IN VOLUME 1163 PAGE 216 DEED RECORDS, DENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS;
OFf 144.23RFEET9INEWIND5 R1 DR! ET TO THE WESTERN NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID 0.092 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE NORTH 34 DEGREES 50 MINUTES AND 55 SECONDS WEST WITH,TNE
j EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF A TRACT DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO THE CITY-OF'
DENTON AKD RECORDED IN VOLUME 691 PAGE 207, DEED RECORDS* A
DISTANCE OF 1038.65 FEET TO AN IRON PIN;
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES AND 30 SECONDS EAfT A DISTANCE
OF 741,47 FEET TO AN IRON PIN IN RINEY ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES AND 45 SECONDS EAST IN RINEY +
ROAD A DISTANCE OF 809.31 FEET TO A CORNER ON THE MOST NORTHERLY 1
BOUVDARY LINE OF SAID 0.092 ACPE CITY OF DENTON TRACT;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES AND 15 SECONDS WEST A DISTA'JCE
OF 6,50 FEET TO AN IRON PIN AT THE NORTHERN NORTHWEST CORNET OF
SA:D 0.092 ACRE TRACT; J
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES AND 42 SECONDS WEST A GISTA:4CE
OF 29.43 FEET TO. THE POINT-OF-BEGINNING AND CONTAINING IN ALL
8.5921 ACHES OF LAND.
i } I
j
i
I
i
r
I
k
E
R
C
s- ISO
EXHIBIT "B'
F
I ~
i ( -
i
I ,
I fowl 004
«►ws %uw
I ' I
U:q a
t i Alti" {
~ tiow
R
06 gwohow
a
o RINLY RD`^_----_~r_-_-
II ;
I °
C
uosss..~ SOUNDAAY Of LUDSCAPL ARLA
I
i '
i
~J
P&Z Minutes
January t1, 1389
Page 7
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the entire area was built in
the 1960's and zoned office and general retail. Ms.
Carson said yes.
Mr. Holt explained to the audience that the existing
zoning would not allow the property owners to rebuild
their homes in the event that 50 percent or more of
their homes were destroyed. With the zoning change,
rebuilding would be allowed.
Ms. Kiker arrived at the meeting.
IN FAVOR: George Holladay, 1913 Hollyhill, asked the
Commission to approve the change in zoning.
i
Larry Burns, 2002 Woodbrooke, agreed with Mr. Holladay
and asked the Commission to approve the change in
zoning.
Ken Robinson, 905 Pill Penny Court, stated that he was
in favor of the zoning change.
OPPOSED; None Present,
RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Carson stated that staff
recommended approval.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of
Z-88-024. Seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously
carried (6-0).
0. Consider making a recommendation on the petition of
W.D. Byrne, representing YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas,
requesting an amendment to an existing Specific Use
Permit in an agricultural zoning district. The
Specific Use Permit allows the property to be used as a
YMCA facility. If approved, the amendment will permit
the alteration of the site plan. The property is
located at the north west corner of Windsor Drive and
Riney Road.
Eighteen notices were mailed to property owners within
200 feet; one reply form was received in favor and none
--re received in opposition,
I STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that this is an
amendment to an existing specific use perr,it. In
August of 1984, the City Council approved a specific
I
I
PSZ Minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 8
use permit for a Y.M.C.A. facility at this site. The
ordinance contained the following conditions: i
1. No detached signs, other than a score board,
shall be permitted.
2. A permanently maintained six (6) foot solid wood i
fence shall be erected along the north property
line.
i
3. the specific use permit shall expire if the
Y.M.C.A. facility is not completed within three
(3) years of the effected date of this ordinance.
Ms. Carson stated that the City Council approved an
I
amendment to the specific use permit in December of
1987 to extend the time frame for development and to
I allow for the development of an office/meeting room i
facility. The city also required additional parking
and landscaping. The 1987 request to extend the
specific use permit granted in 1984 was necessary since
the facility was not completed within the required
three year time period.
{
Ms. Carson continued that the property is located in a
low intensity area according to the Denton Development
Plan. The proposed revision does not include any new
facilities and would not impact the intensity of the
area. She said that an amendment proposes three
changes to the specific use permit: (1) the parking
lot along the northern boundary has been relocated to
the area adjacent to the existing parking lot; (2) a
landscaping plan has been prepared; and (3) a screening
device is not proposed along the northern boundary.
She added that staff feels a screening device is
appropriate.
Ms. Carson stated that the specific use permit
ordinance approved in 1984 required a six (6) foot
solid wood fence along the northern property line.
The condition was revised in 1987 to require a living
screen to be planted along the northern boundary prior
( to the use of the parking lot along the northern
boundary. She said this provision is consistent with
the Landscaping and Tree Preservation Ordinance which
requires a screening device when a nonresidential
facility is constructed adjacent to an existing resi-
dence. The petitioner has requested that the fence
i
r
E
i
PAZ Mirutes
January 11, 1969
Page 9
requirement not be continued; however, staff feels that
the screening fence is appropriate and is complimentary
to the policy of preserving the existing neighborhood.
Since the screening condition of the ordinance has not
been met, staff recommends establishing a new time
frame for completion. Ms. Carson continued that a
landscaping plan has been submitted wit', this request.
The specific use permit required that 20 percent of the
landscape area, generally the area between the property
line and the existing parking lot, be landscaped within
two years of the effective date of the ordinance or
December 8, 1989. The plan submitted meets the
standards of the Landscaping the Tree Preservation
Ordinance.
Ms. Carson stated that in accordance with Article 10 of
Appendix 8, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, a
specific use permit shall be issued only if all of the
following conditions are found:
F
1. Compatible with adjacent land use. As mentioned
previously, the property to the north is
residential. The relocation of the parking lot
to the west boundary of the site and the
landscaping would not "diminish or impair
property values within the immediate vicinity."
2. Impede normal and orderly development.
Development in this area has not been impeded by
the existing Y.M.C.A. facility.
3. Public facility availability. Adequate
utilities and access to roads are available.
Some drainage improvements will be required with
the construction of the new parking tot.
4, vehicular and pedestrian access. One driveway
on Riney Road provides access to the site. The
building has an automatic sprinkling system and
emergency vehicles have access from Riney Road.
5. Nuisance prevention. A screening device along
_ the northern boundary will assist in meeting
this condition. The ordinance states that
measures to control "odor, fumes, dust, noise,
and vibration" should be provided.
i.
J
V
P&I Minutes
January 11, 1969
Page 10
6, cif err. of liahtina. No additional outdoor
lighting is proposed; therefore, no property
owners should be adversely affected.
7 __a.. ~ a.,n Screening. The landscape plan
meets the standards of the Landscaping and Tree i
Preservation Ordinance.
PETITIONER: Bill Byrne, Y.M.C.A. of Dallas, stated that
he agreed with Ms. Carson except for the condition of
the screening. He said that the additional parking
spaces would alleviate most of the problems that are
currently existing. He said that Y.M.C.A. would screen
the property the abuts other property owners that are
not currently screened, but felt that a screening
device in front of an existing screen would not be
appropriate. I
Mr. Glasscock asked what the cost for a solid living ted costeofn$1O.00ceachuforbthe 741 feet would bean too
IN FAY9g: None Present
i
None Present
RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Carson stated that the property to
the north of the area in question is zoned agricultural
(A) and is in a low intensity area. Staff anticipates
residential development and staff's rough estimate for
the screen would be $2,400. Me. Carson concluded that
staff recommends approval with the following
conditions:
1. The fifty (60) additional parking spaces must be
provided within one year of the effective date
of this ordinance.
2. permanently re mintained solid
a three (3) living year fence,
which will matu od
to a minimum height of six (6) feet, shall be
1 erected along the north property line within one
year of the effective date of this ordinance.
i
3. No
scoreboard dshall sbetpermitted aonatheeproperty.
PIZ" Minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 11
4. The landscaping must be installed within one
year of the effective date of this ordinance.
Landscaping shall be installed in conformance
with the Landscaping and Tree Preservation
Ordinance.
5. Physical barriers shall be installed to prevent
access from this site to North Lakes Park within
three (3) months of the effective date of this
ordinance.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the estimate that staff gave
was gust the cost of the materials and not of the
installation. Ms. Carson agreed.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Byrne stated that if there was nothing
between the homes and the property he could understand
the requirement for the screening, but felt that the
existing screening was sufficient.
{ Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Engelbrecht stated that he felt this is
a conflict of existing city standards. He said that he
was in favor of maintaining the land3cape regulations.
i
Ms. Kiker suggested giving the petitioner a longer
period of time to be able to cover the cost for the
j materials and installation. Mr. Holt agreed.
Mr. Glasscock stated that there would still be problems
with financing the maintenance for the screening after
it was installed.
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that there are some shrubbery
that does not require much maintenance.
Mr. Holt stated that he agreed with Mr. Engelbrecht.
He said that he sympathized with the petitioner on the
coat but he felt the Commission should follow the
city's requirements.
Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval of 2-88-025
with the conditions listed by staff with a change in
condition item 2 to allow the petitioner two years
instead of one year and to read as follows:
f
w
1
1S
P&Z Minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 12, 1989
2. shall be erected along the north property
line within two years of the effective date .
Seconded by Ms. Kiker and unanimously carried (6-0).
E. Z-88-02E. Consider making a recommendation on the
petition of Scott Campbell requesting a Specific Use
Permit for a commercial amusement (outdoor) use in an
agricultural zoning district. If approved, the
property may be utilized as a miniature golf course and
related building. The property is located on the south
side of McKinney Street at its intersection with
Cardinal Lane and is more fully describe,i as a 2 acre
tract in the M. Yoachum Survey, Abstract No. 1442.
i
Five notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; one reply form was received in favor ind none
were received in opposition.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that in 1982, the
property to the east was zoned planned development-41
for retail, multi-family, single family attached, and
single family detached land uses. She said that two
proposals for creating a planned development on 60.2
acres, including this area, were submitted in 1986. 1
The proposals included land uses ranging from general
retail to single family attached. Ms. Carson stated
that tle Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
denial of both requests.
Ms. Carson continued that the property is located in a
low intensity area. All the intensity for the area has
been allocated based on existing land uses and the area
is 42 percent over the intensity standard based on the
current zoning in the area. She said according to the
Development Plan, if a disproportionate share of
intensity has been allocated, a development is
evaluated in reference to the least intense, most
logical land use for property in the area. The
Development Plan states that nonresidential uses in
low intensity areas are limited to a maximum of 3 acres
when the property has direct access to a primary or
secondary arterial and that a concentration must be
separated by 1/2 mile. Ms. Carson said the proposed
use does not violate the concentration policy, but
since the tract abuts PO-41, the separation policy
would be violated.
r
V
i
Mailing List
Case Z-88-025
Newton J. Raysor
1204 University
Denton, TX 762C1
Kenneth D. Brown
718 N. Elm
Denton, TX 76201
i
Edward R. Cottle
k Rt. 5 Box 55
Denton, TX 76201
Patrick E. Parker
P.O. Box 1214
Denton, TX 76201
Texas Conference Assoc.
of Seventh Day Adventicts q
P.O. Box 962
Denton, TX 76205
1
s Y.M.C.A. Addition
c/o W.D. Byrne
YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas
601 North Akard
City of Denton
Northridge Heiqhts j
Development Corp.
3419 N. Elm
Denton, TX 76201
Leslie I. Marshall
1122 Riney Rd.
Denton, TX 76201
Gary Marshall Et Ux
3939 Teasley Lane 096
Denton, TX 76205
David Southerlin
1007 Austin
Denton, TX 76201
John Hamilton Reeder
717 w. Windsor Dr.
Denton, TX 76201
11
1
i
-r.
Z-80-025
Page 2
David Leingeber
601 Northridge Dr.
Denton, TX 76201
Curtis Brice Wilson
720 Northridge Dr.
Denton, 1X 76201
Ralph E. Morrison
716 Northridge Dr.
Denton, Tx 76201
George A. Lambert
r' 710 Northridge Dr.
Denton, TX 76201
Lenville 0. Maxwell
706 Northridge Dr.
Denton, TX 76201
Joe C. Thomas
700 Northridge Dr.
Denton, TX 76201
I
i
i
I -
i
l
i
f I
I
i
r
83-50
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE SPECIFIC
USE PERMIT GRANTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 87-222 FOR A YMCA FACILITY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINDSOR DRIVE AND RINEY ROAD;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the site plan approved by Section III of
Ordinance No. 87-222 is repealed. The property shall hereafter
be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with the site plan
shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
i
SECTION II. That the conditions attached to the specific use
permit as specified in Section III or Ordinance No. 87-222 are
repealed. The specific use permit shall hereafter be subject to
following conditions:
A. The fifty (50) additional parking spaces shown on the site
plan herein approved must be provided within one (1) year of
the effective date of this ordinance.
B. In order to provide a solid living screen from existing
or proposed abutting residential uses, plants shall be
installed along the entire northern boundary line of the
property within two (2) years of the effective date of this
ordinance. The plants installed shall be of the number, size,
and type, as approved by the Department of Planning,
sufficient to provide a solid plant screen of a minimum height
of six (6) feet, within three (3) years of planting.
Thereafter, the plant sciaen shall be maintained by
replacement plants, if necess-pry, to provide the screening
herein required.
C. The landscaping provided for in the Landscape Plan of the
approved site plan, shall be installed in compliance with the
provisions of the Denton Landscape Code within one (1) year
1 of the effective date of this ordinance.
D. No ground signs, other than an athletic field scoreboard
signs, shall be permitted on the property.
E. Physical barriers sufficient to prevent vehicular acce4s
from the proposed parking lot to North Lakes Park, as
'1
S
1
determined sufficient by the Department of Engineering, shall
be installed within three (3) months of the effective date of
this ordinance.
SECTj,9N III. That any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fine. a sum not exceeding
$2000.00. Each y sethat a rovision of parate and distinct h offensenance is violated
shall constitute a
SECTION IV,, That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteer (14) days from the date of its passagn, and the City
Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance
to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the cfficial
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
I
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
I`
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
ATTEST: ;
li I
JENNIFER %ALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: j
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i
BY:
f
Z-88-025/Page 2
iI
J
1
i
r
EXHIBIT "A"
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DENTON
WNEREAS, THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN
DALLAS IS THE OWNER OF AN 8.5291 ACRE TRACT IN THE N.H.
010o CITY
8.520 COUNTY ACRE
TRACT AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED FROM THE BARWORTH CORPORATION TO THE
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS ON THE
26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1984 RECORDED IN VOLUME I537, PAGE 136, REAL
PROPERTY RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERN SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SA?A 8.590 ACRE
TRACT WHICH IS AN INNER ELL CORNER OF A 0.092 ACRE TRACT
DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO THE CITY OF DENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES AND
RECORDED IN VOLUME 1163 PAGE 216 DEED RECORDS, OENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS,
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 01 MINUTES AND 00 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE
OF 144.23 FEET IN WINDSOR DRIVE TO THE WESTERN NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID 0.092 ACRE TRACTS
THENCE NORTH 34 DEGREES 50 MINUTES,AND 55 SECONDS WEST WITH THE
EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF A TRACT DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO THE CITY'OF
DENTON AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 697 PAGE 2079 DEED RECOROS, A
DISTANCE OF 1038.65 FEET TO AN IRON PINT
j
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES AND 30 SECONDS WT A DISTANCE
OF 741.47 FEET TO AN IRON PIN IN RINEY ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES AND 43 SECONDS EAST IN RINEY CORN
THE BOU40ARYDILINECOF OSAID 03092E ACREOCITY OFEDENTON TRACT; NORTHERLY
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES AND 1S SECONDS WEST A DESt,";CE
OF 6.50 FEET TO AN IRON PIN AT THE NORTHERN NORTHWEST CORNED OF
SA;O 0.092 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE SOUTH DO DEGREES 10 MINUTES AND 42 SECONDS WEST A OISTA~icf
OF 29.43 FEET TO THE POINT-OF-BEGINNING AND CONTAINING IN ALL
8.5921 ACRES OF LAND.
j
1 {
Z-88-025
n
S
EXHIBIT "B"
II
I I
I i
Cos- °v °r w.;
y I
r
y
4
r-, r
_ SOLID LIVING SCREEN
4 ~--'Wii* 46 so*T.
2-88-025 RrccI ED
lof3
. _J
V
i
.
4 '
>u' EXHIBIT "g^
1 c.>rwua rJ Imy DI R++IM
ac.wtr raver w'uw. 4~
$700 tJ CRY maw ante ►,J.p,l~
olY. o ave4
♦ IJ 11' Dow, wn11 40 11 fpINt:1
"16 A % N -rw~ u• ur
•1; YAN3 ~•G•tp Itpcrta,
1. N W
Of KNtT'IW
/ArYLrto is 9% A
rt+ 14•pytp
reM crw I/ 1 4% 14 a live
1 ►oww♦ iJ:• 1111 Ip I1.r•4e4
H*.1- 1Kq
+.n•
j ~
r /
riJ Doom ps
i i
i
1141.0 WIN
fty
I w
V
been
my
tt Y
r M•~M+ti Yy~
LEGEN
wr._ .
~ f ~ ~ 4At+Y COtIgA
J,#4t 644"
I rw miy
NNIKVnfle) Mol I61 wN pH
t
• •r rwy.., 1'T11` i0wt/Ilt }Q+r.ul
Z-88-025 I
2 of 3
r ~
1
1
r
EXHIBIT "B"
6. r•
i {
• oeoeoe eaee• oeee~su ! '
4p
• ` . ifs
..•r r n `
o
r
I,
f I . I III ,
oil
•oo•
i
2-BB-025
3 of 3 ,
I
J
c
Ai ~-Tp
I
I
i
i
i
~I
I
i
l
a
I
E
I
I
I
i
a
t
'N
d'
DATEi 02/:1/89
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT!
TO: Ma})r and Members of the City Council
FROMi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR Z-86-026
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.
SUMMARY:
A rpecLflc use permit for a minLature golf course is proposed. The
use was evaluated based on the Development Plan policy of least
intense, most logical land use because the intensity for the area
has been exceeded. Large setbacks and screening are provided to
buffer the edges.
BACKGROUND:
The adjacent property to the east is zoned PD-41. In 1986, two
proposals for mixed use develo;..ant were denied by the commission
on 60.2 acres including this site.
a
I PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFPEC'TED:
Five property owners within 200 feet wert notified.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact.
Res tfull su ted:
Prepared by: 4LdZV. Harrell
~ C0.~c-c..-Bye City Manager
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Appro d: -
Frank H, Robb s, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
31269
V
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMI5SION
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Te: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-88.026 Meeting Date: February 21, 1989 +
GENERAL INFORMATION 1
Applicant: Scott Campbell
3037 Oakshire
Denton, Texas 76201
I
Status of Applicant: Developer
Requested Action: Approval of a specific use permit for
an outside amusement facility in an
agricultural zoning district. The
proposed use is for a miniature golf
course.
Location and Size: Approximately two (2) acres located
on the south side of McKinney Street
k at its intersection with Cardinal i
Street.
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - single family-7 and Singing
Oaks Church of Christ
South - agricultural
East - PD-41 (planned
development-retail)
West - agricultural
Denton Development Plan: Low Intensity Area
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: The property has frontage on McKinney
Street (FM 426) which is designated
k as a primary arterial. One access is
proposed. Driveway and parking lot
must conform to Subdivision and Land
Development Regulations.
Utilities: A 12" waterline is required to be
extended along the frontage of
McKinney Street. A 10" sewer line
exists in McKinney Street but pro
rate charges are applicab{e.
(Case Z-88.026)
Page Two
SPECIAI. INFORMATION (continued)
Drainage: A thirty foot grass area has been
provided along the southern boundary
in order to disperse the run-off from
I this site.
HISTORY
In 1982, the property to the east was zoned planned
development-41 for retail, multi-family, single family attached,
and single family detached land uses.
Two proposals for creating a planned development on 60.2 acres,
j including this site, were submitted in 1986. The proposals
included land uses ranging from general retail to single family
attached. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial
t of both requests.
ANALYSIS
The property is located in a low intensity area. All the
intensity for the area has been allocated based on existing land
uses and the area is 421 over the intensity standard based on
the current zoning in the area. According to the Development
Plan, if a disproportionate share of intensity has eel
allocated, a development is evaluated in reference to the least
intense, most iogical land use for property in the area.
The Development Plan states that nonresidential uses in a low
intensT y areas are limited to a maximum of 3 acres when the
property has direct access to a primary or secondary arterial
and that a concentration must be separated by 112 mile. The
proposed use does not violate the concentration policy, but
since the tract abuts PD-41 the separation policy would be
violated.
The surrounding property is vacant; therefore, the neighborhood
preservation policies are not applicable. However, the site
j plan shows that the course is buffered by large setbacks from
adjacent properties. The site plan indicates that the golf
course has an SS foot setback on the west side and a 1SS foot
` setback on the south side. The parking lot located on the south
side of the property is separated by a 30 foot grass area from
the adjacent tract.
I 1
_i
(Case Z-88-026)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (continued)
In accordance with article lU of Appendix B, Zoning, of the Code
of Ordinances, a specific use permit shall be issued only if all
of the following conditions are found:
1. Compatible with adjacent land use. As mentioned previously,
'Fie property to the north is residential, and the property
to the south and west is zoned agricultural. The property
to the cast is located in a moderate intensity area and is
part of Planned Development-41. The larger than normal
setbacks and location of the golf course along the major
arterial buffer the use from the low intensity area to the
south and west. The land use would not "diminish or impair
property values withi the immediate vicinity."
2. Im cde normal and orderl develo moment. The extension of the
waterl ne to t e soul s e o McKinney Street would help to
encourage development on the south side of the street. The
design of the facility would not negatively impact the
adjacent properties.
3. Public facilii evailability. Adequate utilities and access
I to roa s are ava la le. No major drainage improvements will
be required but a thirty (30) foot grass area will be
maintained along the southern property line.
4. Vehicular andedest~rian access. One driveway on McKinney
Street provi esd access to the site. A pedestrian access way
is provided from the parking lot to the golf course and a
{ sidewalk will be required along McKinney Street.
5. Nuisance prevention. The ordinance states that measures to
control To ord , fumes, dust, noise, and vibration" should be
provided. The site should not produce any odor, fumes,
dust, or vibration. The location of the facility should
assist in reducing the noise to the south and west. Singing
Oaks Church of Christ has a large setback on the north side
{ of McKinney Street. Noise should not be a problem with this
type of use at this site.
6. Effect of li htin . Security lighting s;ill be provided in
t PFi`parking lot. Daylight lighting will be used on the
course and no property owners should be adversely affected.
y 7. Landscaaing~and Screening. The landscape plan must meet the l'
i standards of the Landscaping and Tree Preservation
Ordinance. The site plan indicates 6519 square feet or
26.91 of open space/landscaping in the street yard.
I
I
i
t
z
"r
y 3
(C1se Z-88-026)
Page Four
RECOMMENDATION
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-88-026
with the condition: A living screen to reach mature height of
6 feet shall be erected along the southern property line prior
to use of parking lot.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with conditions
3. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Intensity area calculations
i
~-4
I
I
h
ISM
LJ
r
I
x
Z 88 026
NORTH
Ewa. e.~ f
loll 3
Inin
FABLEY
1 p $I _JL4~J~
~El n J
~Ck1N
II ~ O k!'y c
O
r ~
DNA
i
i
BOALE/.AL DATE f22d•66
Z 88 026
NORTH
MCA<INNEy STREET
»
y 'Qd'N
IF t+ r«. tiri
go ffirya
r•~~_~ yr r • ?00 's.
sr rr wr ur
r.
~
t#Ald
lob"
JO V ~ ~1 (~V'' ~ j~ Ki~iun ,M
. c e,rur rr Q ~ 11`•F~VS1vjj J;UI~ 1
{.R l~rU V-fr
:rDw xl ~oZOO I
Zom A&
.0 ACRES
7 tAO►oseo
sM f•-Rots ` J
tov~{s
1•
d A
13t~io' p ,
tr slov~ = 1. I
sw NMI{
LO WrNtAI
, M
P~ ~ Q
k
i ! ~ yr err .
• r1 UP
N "'SS'?S' N ?00.006
•sN1f31 AI' '
SCALE AJOVAr DATE 1242 • W !
1
f
LAND USE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF DENTON
intensity area N: 53 Type: Low Intensity trips/ac 60
Traffic survey tones: 6679A 67T5B
8oundnrv DescrlDtion: So the Existing y andrProwsed Morse Street
Date: 01/05/89 East: Mayhill Road
west: Woodrow Lane
'-1
LAND USE ExISTING LAND BE CURRENT ZONING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
CATEGORY UNITS ACRES INTENSITY ACRES INTENSITY ACRES UNITS INTENSITY
SF-16 < 10 6.81 100 0 0 0 0 0
SF-10>16 6 2.02 60 0 U 0 0 U
SF-7>10 0 0 0 24.79 1041.18 15.8 66 660
LESS SF-7 0 0 0 0 0 U U U
1408, HOMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DUPI.EX 0 0 0 7.12 569.6 16.16 160 1600
MF-R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NP-la2 308 12.05 2464 8.43 1886 3.64 92 136
CON/RET 0 0 0 1.5 975 0 0 0
OFFICE 28.13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
INDUSTRY 9.81 5.91 620.55 289.26 30372.3 O O 0
INSTI'NAL 0 7.18 610.3 0 0 0
PARKS 0 11.47 344.1 0 0 0 0
R/0/SPACE 0 0 0 10.34 0 12.45 U 0
TRANSPORT 5.73 22.86 0 0 0 0 0
AGRIC. 0 0 0 111.93 0 U 0 0
VACANT
----°----------0---50i_47---°---0--------0--------
TOTAL 365.67 569.17 4199 453.37 34644 48.1 2996
INTENSITY CALCULATIONS
(A) Existing Land Us* 56y,71 times 60 34!86
(1) Intensity area total trips 4199
(2) Trips allocated to existint land use
(3) Trips allocated to vacant lands 501.41 times 60 30088
1 (41 Estimated unallocated intensity trips (1) minus (2)4(3) -101
100
(S) Percentage of intensity trips allocated
IB) Current toning 569.77 times 6tl 34!86
(1) Intensity area total trips 4199
(2) Trips allocated to existing land use
(3) Trips allocated to current coning (incl. planned developments) 36718
141 Trips allocated to vacant lands not toned plus Agric. toning
(51 Estimated unallocated intensity trips 11minus1214014(4) -14112
(6) Percentage of intensity trips allocated
P&Z Minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 12, 1989
2. shall be erected along thy north property
line within two years of the effective date
Seconded by Ms. Kiker and unanimously carried (6-0).
i
E. Z-88-026. Ccisider making a recommendation on the
petition of Scott Campbell requesting a Specific Use
Permit for a commercial amusement (outdoor) use in an
agricultural zoning district. If approved, the
property may be utilized as a miniature golf course and 1
related building. The property is located on the south 1
side of McKinney Street at its intersection with
Cardinal Lane and is more fully described as a 2 acre
tract in the M. Yoachum Survey, Abstract No. 1442.
i
Five notices were mailed to property owners within 200
feet; one reply form was received in favor and none
were received in opposition.
STAFF REPORT; Ms. Carson stated that in 1982, the
property to the east was zoned planned development-41
for retail, multi-family, single family attached, and
single family detached land uses. She said that two
proposals for creating a planned development on 60.2
acres, including this area, were submitted in 1986,
The proposals included land uses ranging from general
retail to single family attached. Ms. Carson stated
that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
denial of both requests.
I
Ms. Carson continued that the property is located in a
low intensity area, All the intensity for the area has
been allocated based on existing land uses and the area
is 42 percent over the intensity standard based on the
current zoning in the area. She said according to the
Development Plan, If a disproportionate share of
intensity has been allocated, a development is
evaluated in reference to the least intense, most
logical land use for property in the area. The
Development Plan states that nonresidential uses in
tow intensity areas are limited to a maximum of 3 acres
when the property has direct access to a primary or
secondary arterial and that a concentration must be
separated by 1/2 mile. Me. Carson said the proposed
use does not violate the concentration policy, but
since the tract abuts PD-41, the separation policy
would be violated.
i
I
PIZ Minutes
January 11, 1989 4
Page 13
{
Ms. Carson stated that the surroufoding property is
vacant; therefore, the neighborhood preservation
policies are not applicable. However, the site plan
shows that the course is buffered by large setbacks
from adjacent properties. The site plan indicates
that the golf course has an 85 foot setback on the west
side and a 155 foot setback on the south side. The
parking lot is located on the south side of the
property is separated by a 30 foot grass area from the
adjacent tract. Ms. Carson added that a large buffer
has been offared and staff feels it is adequate.
Landscaping requirements exceed the 20 percent
requirement. Ms. Carson concluded that security
lighting would be used for the parking lot and the
buffer should cover the spill over lighting.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if homes were developed in the
immediate area and the spill over lighting was a bother
to the residents, if the city would have the right to
do something. Ms. Carson stated that the city could
j not tell the business to turn off the lights. She
i added that the city would attempt to assist the
developer in the placing of the lights.
i
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the petitioner could later
come in and add additional amusement on the site.
Ms. Carson said no, they would be bound by the site
plan.
PETITIONER: Scott Campbell, 3030 Oakshire, stated that
Putt Putt Golf has seven locations in the Metroplex.
Since this is a franchise, the requirements are strict
on the upkeep and care of the facility. He said that
there would be a large amount of landscaping at the
course.
Mr. Campbell added that the quality of the site and use
would be valuable to the community.
Mr. Engelbrecht asked if Mr. Campbell would expand more
on the lighting. Mr. Campbell said that the course
would have a fused lighting that would be absorbed on
the course. The parking lot will have two lightpoles
on each end of the parking area that would stay as
close to the parking area as possible.
+ Mr. Engelbrecht asked if cruising through the parking
I 1 lot has been considered. Mr, Campbell said he had not
thought of it but that the 420 foot driveway would have
speed bumps.
1
J
i
i
b
P&Z Minutes
January 11, 1989
Page 14
Mr. Engelbrecht asked why staff had no recommendations
for screening along the southern portion of the
property. Ms. Carson stated that staff was concerned
mainly with the drainage but that screening could be a
requirement.
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that he felt there should be a
requirement for a living screen along the southern
boundary.
IN FAVOR; None Present
OPPOSEO; None Present
RECOMMENDATION: Ms. Carson stated that staff
recommends approval with the condition, if desired,
h that a six foot living screen be planted between the
C southern boundary and the parking lot prior to the use
of the parking lot.
REBUTTAL: None Offered
Chair declared public hearing closed.
I
DECISION: Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend approval
of Z-88-0289 with the condition of the screening device
as stated by staff. Seconded by Fran Morgan.
i
{ Mr. Holt stated that he liked the idea of the miniature
golf course but was concerned with the west side of the
property being developed. He stated that an earlier
case had been presented to the Commission that was high
in intensity and did not want the same petitioners
feeling that they could come back and be approved at
this time. He said that he did not want the petitioner
to assume that the Commission was giving the go ahead
for a high intensity area on the adjacent property.
Mr. Engelbrecht agreed with Mr. Holt.
Vice-Chairman Holt called a vote on the motion and it
carried unanimously (6-0).
F. Consider making a recommendation on the final replat of
+ the Adkisson Addition, Lot 2A.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Yost stated that this is a 2.4950
acre tract located on Woodrow Lane south of McKinney
Street. The property is zoned light industrial (LI)
i
i
. ~i
e~ p
ti
Mailing List
Case 2-88-026
Clifford, Landy 6
Gwen Mulkey
3400 E. McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Tom Jester Jr. 6
Paul Haywood
P.O. Box 260
Denton, TX 76202
Alfredo Moises Cega Et Al
Rinconada De Tiapawya 043
Mexico, Twenty D.F.
Mexico
k Singing Oak Church of Christ
k c/o Jerry Cheatham
406 Ridgecrest
Denton, TX 76201
George W. Thomas
102 Bluebird Circle
E Denton, TX 76201
4
4
E
i
i
4
i
(Al
a
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE
PERMIT FOR A MINIATURE GOLF COURSE FOR TWO ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF McKINNEY STREET, AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH
_ CARDINAL LANE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING
FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
l THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That in accordance with article 10 of Appendix B-
Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, a specific use permit for a
miniature golf course is granted for the 2.0 acres of land located
on the south side of McKinney Street, at its intersection with
Cardinal Lane, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION II. That the property shall be developed, used, and
maintained in accordance with the site plan shown in Exhibit "B",
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In addition,
to the requirements of the site plan, in order to provide screening
for the parking lot, shrubs shall be planted between the parking
lot and the entire boundary of the southern property line, prior
to the beginning of business operations. The foliage installed to
provide the natural screen shall be of the number, size, and type,
as approved by the Department of Planning, sufficient to provide
a solid foliage screen of a minimum height of six (6) feet, within
three (3) years of planting. Thereafter, the foliage screen shall
be maintained by replacement foliage, if necessary, to provide the
screening herein required.
I
SECTION III. That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton,
Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an appendix to
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under
ordinance No. 69-1, as amended, is hereby further amended to show
j the permitted use.
SECTION IV. That any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
$2000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated
shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
r
r
crcTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City
ctpublished hereby twie directed
in c the Denton to be Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the
date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
RAY STEPHENS* MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: '
i
I
2-88-026/Page 2
P
EXHIBIT "A"
All that certain 2.000 acre tract or parcel of land in the M. Yoachum Survev,
Abstract Number 1442, being part of a tract conveyed to Landy L. Mulkey by deed
recorded in Volume 1639, Page 505 Real Property Records, Denton County, Texas;
said 2.000 acre tract being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a found half inch rebar in the south right-of-way line of McKinney
Street for the northeast corner of the herein described tract, same point being the
northeast corner of said Mulkey tract:
Thence South 03 degrees 26 minutes 35 seconds West with an east line of said
Mulkey tract, along and near a fence a distance of 428.22 feet to a set half inch
rebar for corner:
Thence North 86 degrees 33 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 200.00 feet to a
set half inch rebar for corner;
Thence North 03 degrees 26 minutes 35 seconds East 200.00 feet west of and
parallel to the east line of the herein described tract, a distance of 442.99 feet to
a
set half inch rebar in the south right-of-way line of McKinney Street for corner;
Thence
distanceoofh200Z55efeetsto9ampointsof7BeginningEand containin rinhall way line a of- feet or 2.000 acres of land, n8 1 87,120 square
The understgned does hereby certify that the plat hereon is based on an actual
survey made on the ground September 1, 1988, and that it is a true, correct, and
accurate representation of the property as surveyed, that there are no visible and
apparent easements except as shown on said plat; that the quantity of land therein
has been accurately calculated; and that said property has access to a public
roadway unless otherwise noted,
The legal description was done by Stanford Hauptmann, Texas Registered Public
Surveyor, Number 2255, on September 8, 1988.
I
1
i
Z-88-026
J
EXHIBIT
813 026 WORT
McKINNEY STREET
r• a..a
r 'wW.nr~ i~Y. u•b uw'rtO ~S
Ha eaO S !Q'JS'37• E ?OO. SS' C -",W mvs sra
•a.~Ahuanti ~,r+
1 f• A ZING >t GIs
r~
~J
&Ado
tlt
ofts
a . 0 ACRES .a'
~ I ~ pRO►oseo 1'' ~ 2
At RWNt N M+l 'rd
V Sew!
E1 svoo t
t' dw MwN C
L w,tt~ARM. Q 4 w
1 M
C~
,.~cc.~wu c
W, wr ~
M saaWl '1' M no.00~
-goo" Av
i
DATE J2•?2'Sr'P
SCALE
r
i
J
y
144 -1 1-] T
NOW
1
i
i
I
I
I
Ii III 1
I
i ~JI
I
L-LJLJLJLJL L-11
it
i ~
H
DATE: 02/21/99
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PROPOSED NAME CHANGE FOR POCKRUS ROAD TO PAGE ROAD
RECOMMENDATION:
on January 25, 1989,the Planning and Zoning commission recommended
-1 that the name Pockrus be retained. 16 to 1)
SUMMARY
The City received a petition to change the name of Pockrus Road to
Page Road. This petition wag forwarded to the Historic Landmark
Commission at their December 12 meeting. The Commission tabled the
request so that more information could be researched. An additional
petition was presented to the Commission at their January meeting
requesting that the name not be changed. After discussion and
public comment the Historic Landmark Commission recommenced to
maintain the name of Pockrus. The Planning and Zoning Commission
held a public hearing on January 25, 1989. After receiving public
comment for both changing and retaining the name of Pockrus, the
Commission voted to keep the name Pockrus.
BACKGROUND:
In April 1972 the County Commissioners authorized the County
Historic Commission to name streets in the unincorporated areas of
Denton County. The street naming committee for Precinct 2 was
appointed in September 1972. In February 1973 the Committee divided
into four groups based on location within the Precinct. Gregory
Pollard informed the Commission at their November 1973 meeting that
the Committee would be ready to post the ,..:posed street names.
February 1971 the Commission approved the names to be posted. On
March 6, 1915 Bullett Lowry distributed a list of street names with
a map to e e Commission. After minor corrections, the County
Historic Commission approved the list of street names which included
Pockrus as the second name on the list. Mr, Lowry turned the list
over to the County Commissionera Court in February 1976. On
September 2, 1916 the road signs were ordered.
In 1986 a request was made to establish the name of the road to
Page. The Historic Landmark Commission voted to retain the name
Pockrus Road. In 1981 the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended changing the name to Page. when the ordinance
establishing the name Page was forwarded to the City Council, the
Council voted to call the road Pockrus, Attached are the file
documents from that request.
I
r f
I
I
i
I
PROGRAMSo DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS APFEC'IED:
i The Engineering and Traffic Division would be required to correct
er.isting maps and street signs.
PISCAPACT:
The only fiscal impact would ae the cost of the map update and the
new street signs. I
Respect ly submitted: 1
1
Prepared by: re
4cityanager
El ixa g h plan
Plan ifg Administrator
Ap oveds
I
Franc N. Robbins, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
J
09420
E ~
I
j
I
i
J
1 ~
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Engineering and Tratfic Division would be required to correct
existing maps and street signs.
FISCAL IMPACTS
The only fiscal impact would be the cost of the map update and the I
new street signs,
Respect ly submitted:
Prepared bys H to
City onager
~ ! G~ Wrsi~Lf~
Eit2a h Evans
l Plan nq Administrator
I
Ap ovedt +
4
Pr in H. Robbins, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development '
• J
09120
I
I ~
~ I
i
4
s
x
,
t
s
P,: Minutes , Ste. '1 - F-11
7anu arv 'i, 199vi Page J~~ iae~St~cS
Chair declared puhlic hearing closed.
Ms. Morgan asked if the Commission could allow for some
portable signs to be placed on a property like a church
but then moved would portahle signs ever be eliminated.
Sts. Brock stated that they had discussed not making a
destination In content because of constitutional guaran-
tees. She continued that one group could not be allowed
to advertise when that right is denied to others.
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that the document has been reviewed
extensively by various groups and has been reviewed to
determine the legality of the ordinance. He moved to
recommend approval of the sign ordinance amendments with
the changes from staff. Seconded by Ms. Morgan.
Mr. Holt stated that the Commission, when facing a major
issue as this, always seems to be infringing on somebodies
rights. Ile said that it is difficult to regulate some-
things, for example it is very difficult to regulate what
/ oes on a sign. He added a church would be allowed to
have a sign on premise. He continued that the majority of
the people agree that signs should be regulated and that
we are in a minority group of cities that still allow
portable signs. He added that there are still options for
signage in the city.
Chairman Brock called for a vote on the motion and it
carried unanimously (7-0).
B. Consider making a recommendation on a proposed name change
of Pockrus Road to Page Road.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Evans stated that this was brought
before the Historic Landmark Commission in 1986. The
Historic Landmark Commission voted to retain the name
Pockrus Road. In 1987, the Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion recommended changing the name to Page. When the
ordinance establishing the name Page was forwarded to the
City Council, they voted to call the road Pockrus.
Ms. Evans stated that the City recently received a peti-
tion to change the name of Pockrus Road to Page Road.
This petition was forwarded to the Historic Landmark
Commission at their December 12, 1988 meeting. The
Commission tabled the request so that more Information
could be researched. Ms. Evans said that on additional
petition was presented to the Commission at their January
meeting requesting that the name not be changed. After
discussion and public comment, the Historic Landmark
Commission recommended to maintain the name of Pockrus.
Ms. Brock stated that since two petitions were received,
the Commission would handle this public hearing differently
than how the others are held. She stated that the Commis-
sion would hear from the side that requested the name
change and then hear from those requesting It to stay as
Pockrus Road,
` PETITIONER FO0. PAGE ROAD; Francis Gregg, 1902 N. Hwy 577,
{ F3lot7oTht, stated that she has been pursuing this since
1972. She said that she and her family purchased proparty
in 1968 and then purchased more acreage in 1970. In 1972,
she started a business and needed an address to show the
location of her business. She went to the city and was
referred to the Historical Commission who requested some
type of historical value to name the road after. She said
that she had found that a Dr. Page had once resided in the
area and that there was a town called Old Page Town. She
I
is
w:
C
k ;
1[r
I t
k
PG: NIL nu tes
January 25, kids fl7 ¢-n r,}
f 7 page 5
said that the ilistorical Commission then recommended it he
named Page Road. She said that there is also an old ceme-
tery in the area that has seseral Page's buried there.
She added that since the headstones were in poor cor"11tion
to photograph, she had stenciled them on paper. Pls. rregg
ppassed out the paper with the stenciled captions to the
Commissioners.
Ms, Gregg continued that the County later decided to name
the roads but did not contact the residents of the proper-
ty. The County named tl,e road Pockrus Road. She said
commu-
that
and that s it that Dr. Page
is an easier w name respected to remember.
nIiV FAY OR OF PAGE ROAD: Betty Richmond, 3730 Pockrus Road,
sa t at s e as Tamed in the area for 13 years and that
Reveryone that Lives on the road has requested it be named
Page Road. She said that the PockrusIs do not live an
that road and that they should not be concerned with it.
As. Richmond presented two utility bills to tr'. Commission
that she receives with the address of Page RoiJ. She
stated that she would like to see It changed to Page.
Mr. Kamman asked if there were any street signs that were
In the area now. Ms. Richmond stated that there is one
and it says Pockrus Road.
Mr. Glasscock asked If the cemetery was still having
funerals conducted. Ms. Richmond said that the last
service was In 1948,
Ilene Powell, Rt. 7 Denton, said that she once asked the
city to name their road after her husband but was told no
because he was still living, After her husbands death,
she returned to the city and asked to have the road named
after him and the city still refused, She said that the
Pockrus's are still alive and she does not feel that they
should be entitled to have It in their name. She said
I thethletorlcalwvaluegshouldcberconsidered~munlty and that
Lucy Jones, Sherwood Mobile Home Park Denton, stated that
every name on the petition is the name of a property
owner, She said that the petition for Pockrus is just a
f roup of peoples names. Ms, Jones sold that the people on
ockrus Road pay city taxes and they would like to see the
name changed to Page. 4s. Jones concluded by reading a
letter from Mr. Harry Duncan who was unable to attend the
meeting who stated he was in favor of the name change.
C.M. Gregg, 1902 %A Highway S77 Pilot Point, asked the
Commissioners to sider the request of the landowners
before making their decision.
Jana Sedman, Rt. 7 Denton, stated that she has a home on
Swisher Road and the survey plat she has for her property
indicates that the road In question is listed as Page Road.
h' Joy Powell, Rt, S ;ox 174-A Denton, stated that she is in
I{ favor of the name change.
PETITIONER FOR POCKRUS ROAD: Alice Pockrus, stated that
Ills family, ,who havecbeen in the up sincerthe 1870iS. with
His grandfather died at the age of 35 and was burled at
the Shiloh Cemetery. His family started a water well and
hat been there for years.
s
s
W Minutes
January .5, 199)
Page 6 f J I
Ms. Pockr continued that their entire property, at the
time, was bordered by Packrus Road. She asked the Commis-
sic❑ to consider the history of the Pockrus's and to keep
the name as Packrus Road.
IN FAtiUR OF PUCARUS ROAD: Dennis Pockrus stated that he
I Zivc3 on oc- rus Road T-or 43 years and though the address
has been fanged to read "I-35", it stlli remains Pockrus
Road to him. He asked to retain the name.
' Clara Lawson stated that for the memory of the family, she
would like the road to stay Pockrus.
%%s, Pockrus stated that she had a signed paper From two
men that were alive at the time Dr. Page would have been
alive and they state that they did not know of a Dr. Page.
REBUTTAL FOR PAGE ROAD; Ms. Richmond stated that she
nows a man t aTi tTs U years old that remembers Dr. Page
and Old Page Town. He also remembers that the road was
` named Page Road In 1969.
If REBUTTAL FOP POCKRUS ROAD: Ms, Pockrus said that she
would e t e roams stay the same and that the
landowners on the road now would not have a hard time
changing their address on their personal belongings,
E I
Chair declared public hearing closed.
DECISIOSi Ms, Brock informed the audience that it is very
difficult for the Commission to make a decision since It
was the County's responsibility and is now the City's, {
Ms. Brock asked Ms. Evans what the cost of replacement
j would be. Ms. Evans stated that it would include all
I signs and naps. She added that It would not be a lar4e
expense.
i Ms. Morgan asked how the road la currently listed,
Ms. Evans replied Pockrus Road is on city maps and the
City Council had officially named the street by ordinance.
Ms. Brock asked how the road was indicated during the time
of annexation. Ms. Evans stated that both names were used,
Ms. Riker asked if the police, fire, and post office are
contacted when a toad name Is changed. Mr. Robbins said
the Engineering Deppartment maintains official maps and are
responsible for noilfying others. He sold there is an
officer, from the police department, who is going over the
maps Eor etting up the new 911syystem, fie added that one
problem iss that the may he is wotking with says Page Road
on one side and Pockrus Road on the other.
Ms. Riker asked who gave the County the authority to name {
the road. Ms. Evans stated that the County Commissioners
had given the authority to the County Historical Commis-
slon but they no longer have that authority.
Mr. Holt stated that he did not want to continue having
the public hearings for the name change. He said the last
time it was presented to the Commission, they voted on
Page Road and when later token to the City Council, it was
voted to remain Packrus Road. He said it has been Packrus
Road since 1916 and he did not feel there was enough
reason to change the name.
Mr. Holt moved to recommend denial of the name change
and to retain the none of Pockrus Road, Seconded by
Mr. Ramman.
1~
a
s
t a
s
a
Jamiary 1989
Page
T
Ms. Brack stated that she was in favor of Page Road two
years ago when it was presented to the Commission and she
still feels that the property owners that live there
should be able to have their choice on what they want as a
road name. She added that she would vote against the
retention of Pockrus Road,
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that he would agree with Mr. Holt
and that he did not want to see it over and over agQain.
He said that it vas established by the County Commis-
sioners and they took into consideration the historical
aspect at the time they named the road. lie said that he
would vote in favor of Pockrus Road.
Chair called for a vote on the motion and it carried (6-1)
to retain the name of Pockrus Road. Ms. Brock voted no.
Ms. Biker left the meeting.
i
III. Considerations
A. Consider making a recommendation on the final plat of the
Offenbacker Addition, Lotu 2 and 1, Block 1.
i
STAFF REPORT: Mr, Yost stated that biing plotted are two
non-non-contiguous lots In the William Loving Survey, totaling
67; acres. These two lots are separated by Lot t Block
1, of the Offenbacker Addition, which was platted In
December of 1981.
Mr. Yost continued that the property is toned PD-office
and office development is anticipated, Present plans call
for office buildings on these and adjoining the lots,
including Lot 1, Block 1 of the Fred Moore Addition, He
said that the plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
All necessary infrastructure is in place or secured.
Mr. Yost concluded that the Development Review Committee
recommends approval.
DECIS1DNl Mr, Kamman moved to recommend approval of the
TT'-nT p at of the Offenbecker Addition, Lots 2 and 1,
Block 1.
B. Consider approval of a plan to remove protected trees
along Nillowsprings in conjunction with the drainage
project, as provided for in Appendix C of the Code of
~ - rd nan<es.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Clerk stated that the Willowsprings
ra n3 age project is a major project and is currently
causing flooding on Duncan Street, He said that the
4 roject is ready for bidding but there are numerous trees
n the area of the construction,
Mr. Clerk stated that Mr. Yost has been to the site and
has agreed that the trees are susceptible of dying due to
j the construction. He said that the trees are in the way
of creating a proper site for the drainage channel and the
cost would be considerably higher to reroute the channel
around the trees. He added that even possible rerouting
would effect the health, of the trees.
Mr. Clark said ti,st there are 24 trees that would need to
be removed and they would include 12 Post Oaks, 1 Pecan,
1 Ceder Elm, S Bois D'arc, and 7 Hackberrys,
i
a i
1 4
I .
M .
I Minutes
' HISTORIC LANDMARk COk1glSSION
January 9, 1989
The regular meeting of the Historic Landmark Committee of the
City of Denton was held on January 9, 1989 at 5:00 p.m. in the
Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building.
i Present: Judith Abbott, William Barker, Mike Cochran,
Catherine Conrady, Gaylen Fickey, Richard Hayes, Tom
Miller and William Hansbury
Absent: Bullitt Lowry and Janet Shelton
I
Present from Staff: Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator;
and Olivia Carson, Secretary
h Chairman Cochran called the meeting to order.
1. Consider a proposed name change from Pockrus Road to
Page Road.
Mr. Barker moved to remove the discussion of the Pockrus
Road name change from the table. Seconded by Ms.
Conrady and unanimously carried (6-0).
j ! Ms. Evans stated that she talked with Yvonne Jenkins of
the County Historical Commission. Ms. Jenkins checked
the minutes of the County Historical Commission all the '
` way back to 1972. The road in question was in Precinct
2 at that time and it was assigned to a street naming 1
committee. In late 1973, loose ends were tied up. On
October 4, 1973, Ms. J. D. Adkins spoke to the County
Historical Commission about naming Pace and Bernard
Streets. She spoke to the Commission again in November
of that year about Bernard. In February 1974, street
names were approved by the committee and prepared for
posting. In 1975, Mr. Bullitt Lowry submitted a list of
names to the County Historical Commission. The list was
approved. The name Pockrus was on the list. In 1976
' the names were given to the County Commissioners Court
and were approved by them. Road signs were ordered
later. Ms. Evans stated that she has not received any
other documents from property owners with infor-qation
about Page as a historical name. She said that she has
now received a petition in favor of retaining the name
of Pockrus.
Mr. Cochran said that the petition in favor of Pockrus
has 419 names on it.
1
~ J
i
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
January 9, 1989
Page 2
Ms. Evans stated that there are 95 names on the petition
or Page.
The on
close Mtot Pof 0e ockrus. people
petitions lthe ive name to
petition in favor of Pockrus did not list addresses.
Mr. Cochran said that most of the people who live on
Pockrus signed the petition in favor of the change to
Page. The road was called Page for a brief time and
that name was used by the Post Office.
Mr. Hayes arrived at the meeting.
Mr. Kenneth Owens stated that there was a road sign with
on then road it since one time. The He said sign that behe has
aring
t1te lived name
the name Page was installed shortly after the road was
annexed into the City. The first sign said Page, then
was changed to Pockrus, then Page, and finally back to
Pockrus.
Mr. Cochran pointed out that a street sign 'is not a
legally binding entity.
Ms. Dorothy Estes said that she moved to the area in
1981. The street signs said Page at that time, then
changed to Pockrus and then back to Page.
Mr. Cochran said that from his research he has
determined that the street sign of Page was an error.
I The County Commissioners had named the road Pockrus.
Mr. Hansbury asked if the annexation document showed
street names.
Ms. Evans stated that the City normally uses existing
names. The annexation documents probably show whatever
name was taken from the County maps. In response to the
bicentennial
Pockrus the chosen by Commissioners
name for this
particular road.
Mr, Hansbury stated that the County Historical
Commission used to name streets all the time. They were
chartered to do so. They no longer have the authority
to do so at this time.
1 Ms. Betty Richmond stated that the road has been called
Page all along,
kI
i I
i
I
I
I
i
r+
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission ;
January 9. 1989
Page 3
Ms. Francis Gregg stated that she bought 20 acres along
the road in 1968. In 1973, she purchased more. She had
a business in Lewisville and moved it to the present
location. For business purposes, an address and name
for the road was needed. She said that she called to
find out how to get a name and was told to contact the J
Historical Commission. They asked her to find out 11
historical information about the area. The road led to
Old Page Town. There are many old relics on her
property. Old Dr. Page used to live around the area.
There used to be an old grocery store in Page Town. Ms. 11
Gregg said that printing for business documents is
charged by the letter so she asked the historical
Commission if the road could be named Page instead of
Old Page Town and the Commission agreed. Page is an
1 easy name to understand. Pockrus is too confusing.
People do not understand it and she is forced to spell
it out to them. When talking long distance, spelling
costs money. She continued that the Historical
Commission called her and told her to use Page as the
road name. She said that she was never notifibd of any
public hearings about a possible name and the street
sign was installed as Page,
Mr. Cochran said that notice of the hearings would have
been in the newspaper and posted at the Courthouse.
Ms. Gregg stated that the Page street sign was stolen.
It was replaced by a Pockrus sign and then by Paige.
Ms. Gregg stated that she is a barber and beautician.
If there is something incongruous about her clients she
keeps it to herself. That is similar to what doctors
do. Old Dr. Page would have known the people in the
area personally. He imparted something to the
community. It would be a tribute to him and the
surviving Pages to have the road named Page. When the
street was named Pockrus, the right people were not
contacted.
1
Mr. Cochran stated that he does not know that Page was
ever an officially designated name.
Ms. Gregg stated that it wasn't officially named but
because it joins into I-35 a street sign was installed.
Page is a name of historical value.
Mr. Cochran pointed out that Pockrus has historical
value as well.
Ms. Gregg said that the Pockrus family did not live on
the road. They lived about a mile down from the road.
i
I
r~
e
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
January 9, 1989
Page 4
Mr. Owens asked if what the road was officially na.aed
makes more difference than what the residents want.
Mr. Cochran stated that the ultimate decision is with
the City Council. The Historic Landmark Commission will
make a recommendation to them. The Commission's main
duties are to administer historical preservation but
recommendations on road names has been added as an
additional duty.
Ms. Alice Pockrus said that she lives on the road. It
borders her property on the north side. She has been
there since 1945. Her husband's grandfather moved to
---1 the area in the 1800's. The Pockrus family has been in
the water well business for 88 years. She said that she
has talked with the police, funeral administrators, and
delivery people and they prefer that the name remain
Pockrus. The name has been in the area since 1945.
Mr. Barker stated that he has been contacted. by some
older people in town that would like the name to remain
Pockrus.
i
Ms. Clara Lawson stated that her sister has lived on
Pockrus Road for 25 years. She always called the road
Pockrus or Harvard. The community was called Old Page
Town but the road was not.
Ms. Abbott stated Pockrus is the legal name. Unless
there is some compelling reason to change the name it
should be left as it is.
Mr. Cochran stated that when there is confusion over a
street naiae, changing It back to another name will only
add to the confusion. He said that he likes Page but
without more overwhelming evidence it is hard to support
that name. There is also expense involved in changing
the name. The decision on the street name in 1976 was
made arbitrarily but a decision to change the name now
would also be arbitrary.
Ms. Evans stated that there was a petition its 1987 to
name the road Page and the City Council decided in favor
of Pockrus. The Planningg and Zoning Commission had
recommended Page but the Clty Council did not follow the
recommendation.
Mr. Owens stated that the residents were not notified of
the City Council meeting. The residents prefer Page.
What the residents want should be more important than
the legal name.
t
6.
s
.
I
5linutes
Historic Landmark Comm issior,
January 9, 1989
Page 5
Mr. Cochran agreed that Mr. Owen has a valid argument.
He said that he disagrees with it but the Historic
Landmark Commission's recommeiidation may be overruled by
the Planning and Zoning Commission as it was done the
last time this issue was addressed.
Mr. Miller said that the Page name is more justifiable
historically. It was a mistake in the past not to name
the road Page.
Ms. Conrady asked why it was a mistake.
Mr. Miller said that the road led to the Old Page Town
community and it was called Page Road sometimes.
Ms. Gregg said that she still has customers that call
the road Page.
Ms. Pockrus stated that her sister has lived around the
area for 80 years and has never heard of Dr. Page.
Ms. Lucy Jones, manager of Sherwood Mobile Home Park,
stated that Dr. Page is buried in the Old Page
c, metery.
~I I
Mr. Cochran asked when Dr. Page died.
Ms. Jones stated that she has been to the cemetery and
the doctor's name was John Preston Page. She said that
she was unsure of his death date. The people in
Sherwood Mobile Home Park do not want the road to be
named Pockrus. It is an aggravation. She said that she
has to tali businesses and spell out Pockrus all the
time. It is expensive to do so when calling long
distance. Dr. Page was a fine country doctor. Mr.
Kenas has lived on the road for 47 years and he knew it
as Page.
Ms. Opal Pockrus said that since there has been
confusion over the spelling of Page it is not slopler
than Pockrus. At one time "Page" was misspelled as
"Paige".
Mr. Hayes moved to recommend that the road name remain
Pockrus. Seconded by Mr. Barker.
4 Mr. Cochran emphasized that the Historic Landmark
III Commission does not make the final decision. The
f Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council will
both hold public hearings on the matter and the City
Council will make the final decision.
I
1
J
1
E
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
January 9, 1989
Page 6
Mr. Barker stated that there was a point in time when
the County Historical Commission was helping name roads
in unincorporated areas. The Historic Landmark Commis-
sion is a body that advises the City Council. It is not
responsible for naming roads.
Roll call vote:
Ms. Abbott - aye
Mr. Barker - aye
Mr. Cochran - aye
Ms. Conrady - aye
Mr. Fickey - aye
Mr. Hayes - aye
Mr. Miller - nay
Motion carried (6-1)
i
Mr. Cochran stated that it is not necessarily the
respoi.sibility of the Historic Landmark Commission to
initiate proceedings based on the history of the road.
The Commission's mission is to administer the Historical
1 Preservation Ordinance. The Commission also does other
things as they are asked of them and spend time working
1 on them. He said that he likes Page better and if he
lived on the road would probably have signed the
petition in favor of Page. If the petitioners can find
out more information about Dr. Page it would be helpful i
to their case. Names should not be changed arbitrarily.
Ms. Gregg stated that she is disappointed. She said
that she spent a lot of time getting information for the
County Historical Commission and for the Historic
Landmark Commission.
Ms. Richmond stated that many of the petitioners are on
social security. They are being required to change the
addresses on their driver's licenses, social security,
stationery, etc. She said that she is on the crime
watch committee and has talked with police who know the
road as Page, not Pockrus.
II. Discuss Historic Designation for 424 Fry Street.
i Mr. Hayes stated that the application submitted does not
I contain enough information for the Commission to make a
i decision. He moved to postpone the discussion until a
more complete application or additional information is
submitted. Seconded by Ms. Conrady.
{
III
I
V
I
i
' Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
December l2, 1988
Page 3
I 11. Consider making a recommendation to change the name oC
Pockrus Road to Page Road.
Nis. Pockrus asked why she was not informed of the
petition to change the road name.
Mr. Cochran explained that staff did not create the
petition. It was given to the staff by citizens `or
processing.
%is. Evans stated that the staff received a petition from
residents in the Pockrus Road area to change the name of
the road to Page. In 1987, the Planning and Zoning
Commission addressed the issue and recommended that the
name of the road be changed to Page. The City Council
established the road name as Pockrus. According to
f Yvonne Jenkins at the County Historical Museum, the name
Pockrus was decided on by the County in 1976 during their
road naming process. Pockrus Road was in Precinct 2 at
the time.
Mr. Lowry stated that he was involved In the road naming
process. Public hearings were held and a report was
taken to the Commissioners Court. The names were decided
on based on the report. The road naming process occurred
between 1971 and 1976. The last precinct was done In
1976. Pockrus Road was probably processed earlier than
1976. Mr. Lowry said that there was some justification
for naming it Pockrus, but he does not recall the reason.
Ms. Shelton asked why the issue is being brought to the
Historic Landmark Commission.
Mr. Robbins explained that name changes have
traditionally been brought to the Commission because
there may be historical significance in the name of a
street.
Ms. Evans said that Ms. Jenkins had informed her that
there was a Page Cemetery in the Pockrus Road area.
Francis Gregg stated that she had bought property in the
area in 1973. She asked the city to name the road for
the purposes of obtaining a business address. The
Historical Commission asked her to bring them historic
information on which to base the name. The road led to
Old Page Town. There used to bean old grocery store in
V Page Town and a Dr. Page lived in the area. The
i
i
it
{r` D
1 '
Minutes
Historic Lrndmark Commission
December 12, 1996
Page 4
Historical Commission recommended calling it Old Page
Town. Ms. Gregg said that she told them it was too long,
and they decided on Page. All businesses and residents
got their legal papers done as Page. Later the County
decided to name the road but the residents did not know
of the public hearings. The City at one time placed
street signs on the road bearing the name "Page". They
disappeared and were replaced with street signs bearing
the name "Paige". At the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting, the residents were asked if they liked
Page/Pockrus but that is too long. Since there was an
old Dr. Page working in the area, tribute should be given
to him and the elderly Pages who still live in the area.
She added that the Pockrus family lives closer to Corinth.
Mr. Cochran stated that the road name seems to have been
an arbitrary decision in the first place.
Mr. Lowry asked if there was an actual hearing by the
Historical Commission on the name of the road.
Ms. Gregg stated that the Commission considered it but
most of the discussions were done on the telephone.
There was no formal hearing. The Historical Commission
talked with the City and got approval for Page. Ms.
Gregg stated that she gathered the information for the
Historical Commission because she needed a street name on
which to identify the location of her business. She said
that she bought the property in 1973 and got the street
named later in that year.
Mr. Cochran asked how mail is received on the road.
I Ms. Gregg said that it is to post office boxes.
Ms. Evans said that mail was originally addressed to a
route, then to Page, and finally to Pockrus.
Lucy Jones said that she has talked with the post office
and was told she could use either name.
Mrs. Pockrus stated that she has lived in the area for 45
k years. Her family were the only people who lived on the
and asaiman from
called her later. Wisband day
the road City first. County Others
d that
county roads were being named. He asked her husband if
I he would like the road to be named Pockrus. Mr. Pockrus
j said that the road should be Page because of Old Page
k Town. One day they came home and it was named Pockrus.
They were pleased. Then they heard of the hearings in
i
I
I
~I
f
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
December 12, 1988
Page 5
1987. Ms. Pockrus continued that her husband's father
lived at the end of Swisher at Shady Shores Road. His
father owned property where Oakmont is at the Shady
Shores exit. The family was pleased that a road had been
named after them. It was only called Page for a short
while. Pockrus is on the maps now. The Police prefer it
to be left as Pockrus. She added that she and her
husband have lived at their current location for 45
years. They have a water well business and the Pockrus
name is known all over the country. It is not so unusual
as to confuse people.
Ms. Evans stated that the notice of the meeting was sent
out late in the week. There may be some residents of the
area who did not receive notice of the meeting in time.
Property owners and those who signed the petition were
notified. Staff has not heard any responses prior to the
meeting. The Commission may wish to postpone a decision
until the next meeting.
Mr. Cochran asked how many people live on the road.
Ms. Pockrus stated that there are four or five houses and
the trailer park has about 80 residents.
j Ms. Richmond stated that she has lived on the road for 13
years. There is a cemetery that was dedicated by the
Historical Commission in the area. She said that she has
problems telling people where people where she lives.
She gets all kinds of addresses on her mail. In the 13
years that she has lived there, the address has changed
four times. She added that she has called the police and
the dispatcher did not know where Pockrus Road is located.
Mr. Lowry stated that one of the requirements in the
hearings held be the County was that no names be
duplicated. The police and fire departments didn't want
confusion between the precincts. That might have been
considered when naming the road Pockrus. He said that he
would like to check the historical records on the subject.
Ms. Richmond stated that Ms. Pockrus actually lives on
I-35.
Mr. Cochran stated that the Commission cannot make a
decision based on where someone lives. All opinions
count.
k
I
1
f
l
i
Ainu tes
` Historic Landmark Commission
December 12, 1988
Page 5
1987. Ms. Pockrus continued that her husband's father
lived at the end of Swisher at Shady Shores Road. His
father owned property where Oakmont is at the Shady
Shores exit. The family was pleased that a road had been
named after them. It was only called Page for a short
while. Pockrus is on the maps now. The Police prefer it
to be left as Pockrus. She added that she and her
husband have lived at their current location for 45
years. They have a water well business and the Pockrus
name is known all over the country. It is not so unusual
as to confuse people.
Ms. Evans stated that the notice of the meeting was sent
out late in the week. There may be some residents of the
area who did not receive notice of the meeting in time.
Property owners and those who signed the petition were
notified. Staff has not heard any responses prior to the
meeting. The Commission may wish to postpone a decision
until the next meeting.
Mr. Cochran asked how many people live on the road.
Ms. Pockrus stated that there are four or five houses and
the trailer park has about 80 residents.
Ms. Richmond stated that she has lived on the road for 13
years. There is a cemetery that was dedicated by the
Historical Commission in the area. She said that she has
problems telling people where people where she lives.
She gets all kinds of addresses on her mail. In the 13
years that she has lived there, the address has changed
four times. She added that she has called the police and
the dispatcher did not know where Pockrus Road is located.
Mr. Lowry stated that one of the requirements in the
hearings held be the County was that no names be
duplicated. The police and fire departments didn't want
confusion between the precincts. That might have been
considered when naming the road Pockrus. He said that he
would like to check the historical records on the subject.
Ms. Richmond stated that Ms. Pockrus actually lives on
I-35.
j Mr. Cochran stated that the Commission cannot make a
` decision based on where someone lives. All opinions
count.
i
i
j
T
lliriutes
Historic Landmark Commission
December 12, 1988
Page 6
Mr. Lowry said that he appreciates the trouble the people
took to come to the meeting but he would like to have
more information upon which to base a decision. 'Ihe
County Commissioners had a list of priorities upon which
they based their road name decisions. These included
tradition, prominent topography or hi
deceased storical Eeature,
war heron, and early land owners. There was a
eon.
Naming ttthe road against naming have for be living onrsthe
historical feature of Old Page Town.
Ms. Gregg said that there is an old well in the area that
people used to get water from, Mr. Kenas, a local
resident, found an old abstract from the 1800's with the
name Page on it.
Mr. Lowry moved to table the discussion with the
intention of obtaining more materials and information.
Seconded by Mr. Barker.
Ms. Jones stated that there used to be an old depot in +
the area.
Mr. Lowry stated that the railroad may have old documents
with a name for the road.
I I ~
Ms. Richmond stated that Mr. Kenas may be reluctant to J
let them bring the abstract to the meeting.
i
{ Mr. Cochran said that a photocopy
duplication would be acceptable. or handwritten
Vote was called and carried unanimously (S•0).
Ms. Jones asked if the Page family could add anything.
Mr. Cochran said that the meeting is open to the public
and all are welcome.
Ms. Richmond said that old county maps show the road as
Page.
Mr.
area Low Perhaps a said at new rjads are being created in the
necessary.
Ill. PUBLIC HEARING
I
Consider approval of a demolition application at 704 West
Hickory.
i
J
I
r
I
a
PETITION rOR RE-CONSIDERATION TO CHANGE ROAD NAME
4
` TO; PLANNING AND DEVELOPEMENT DEPARTMENT,
THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY, AND THE PENTON CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF DENTON, COUNTY OF DENTON
We thete6ident6 od Slietwood Nob Homo Oneb~ ot"A ptopetty owneae
and othet people living on PAGE/POCKRUS ROAD, petition
conaidetation to chnage this toad back to PAGE onty beea604
u6ea 4e-
wad a When thin ditdt came up to change it atom Page to Pocktua there
petition dent in to leave thin ad Page Road. The Planning and +
Devetopement voted to leave it a6 Page. The Hidtoticat Society and
The Denton City OCuncil were the one6 voting to change it. At the
City Council Meeting the Petition wad not tead.I wad at the meeting,
(2) The teaidenta o6 this area wad not indotmed about thi6 being
on the agenda Got that night, Some o6 ua bound out accidently, and
- we were at the meeting. Howevet there were onty aiz (6) o6 u6 to one
4 Poektua.
(3) Thi6 toad had been known ad Page Road dot many, many
Page6 owned thie land atom Mayhitt and 135, where the Advantagehe
homed ate dot dell to the cones od thi6 toad. The Page'6 moved here
i
the n the early pact od 11817, The 6it4t Page that died wad buried in {
wad donatedtbykthenPaad age gela. Cementaty.
Since then tote ate devetat Page'A buried here. There wad a community
here at one time known ad "OLD PAGE TOWN". Thiel toad wad named dot
an etdetty Doctot, now decea6ed. DR. T. J. Page. We beet that hid
memory ahoutd live on. He dti'.l had a lot o6 6amity living in Denton
and Denton County.
(I) The name Poektue i6 moat conducting to tedidentd living here and
i
n the Mob ite Home Patk, It id eoneuaing to detivety people ad
wet
newltolthedatnot on ea and t don't tkn ow to County
tett peopte and a
that t maybe p lookingte
dot them that, thin used to be Page toad ad it id on the maps, The
6itet thing peopte adk,that does not know the atea, "How do you spelt
*t"., POCKRUS that ie.'
(VE THE RESIDENTS DO NOT WANT THIS ROAD NAMED POCKRUS.
(5) The Poektua gamily had only been here thirty 1301 of dotty 140) `
yeatd, That i6 not neatly ad sat back ad the Page damity.
NAME- .......................ADDRESS.. PHONE
irv? 5, .7
-397
RnC ~ ~ ' /Cl: '~a.2.
f L Lo *_~c. lz6- /G 7,)
rd(
' 3-
' ~v 1 y, -~y 35 ~ 'c7~L
18.7 i ~l'. , r~ /►l f c~ '~~~fj I~ 1
~ I
I
{ 1
h
I
l
i
R
I~
I Jr
it
January 6, 1989
Historical Landmark Commission
715 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
ATTENT1ONs Ms. Eli:abeth Evans
Dear Commission Nemberi
In reference to Pockrus Road, we would like for you to consider our
h reasons for wanting it to remain as named.
The Pockrus family has lived in this community for over one hundred
years. In the 1870's, Pete's grandfather, Vinson Fockrus and family
came from Alabama and settled at the other end of Pockrus Road at
Shiloh Cemetery. He raised his family, v:orked his farm and died at
this location. Both prandoarents are buried at Shiloh Cemetery.
Pete's father, William D. Pockrus, owned 173 acres which extended
k from Shady Shore overpass through Oakmont Estates to Denton State
` School. He operated his water well drilling service, raised his
family and died at the age of 84 at this location. He drilled a
flowing well for the Corinth Cotton Gin in 1902. Both parents are
buried at Shiloh Cemetery.
In 1945, we bought our property which is located on I-35 E., South
across from Triangle Chevrolet. The entire north side of our property
is bordered by ?ockrus Road. We have conducted our business, Pockrus
'h'ater 'Fell Drilling and Pockrus Water Well Pump Sales and Service at
this location since 1945. Since living here, our two children were
born and atthnded public schools and North Texas State University.
The Pockrus name has been before the public as property owners, local
residents, businesses and through advertisments. The road has been
known as Pockrus Road by firemen , mail carriers and other local
residents as a geographical location. In the 1970's, it was officially
named by the Denton County Commissioners as Pockrus Road. It has
been printed on mans by that name.
Our family considers Pockrus Road a memorial. We appreciate you
considering the above facts in your decision concerning Pockrus Road.
Thank you,
C~.Ci `lt~s~ ~lG l~
H. W. "Pete" and Alice Pockrus
39':l 1. 35 E., South
Denton, Texas 76205
li
I
i
r ,
3
Y
January 1989
Historical landmark Commission
'15 E. Mckinney i
Denton, Texas 76,)o1
Regarding3 Pockrus Road
Desr Commission i ber:
I s-3oke with Earl 9entley concerning the small cemetery
located on chat was formerly the Bentley property. Mr.
j Bentley is 50 years of age. He stated to his knowledge
there had never been a name posted at this cemetery or a
funeral conducted during his life time. He is mailing
a letter stating this information.
i
Thank you for considering this ?-itter.
t Cordially,
Alice Pockrus
{ I
I
j
I
t ~
i {
I
j
i
x
T
M,
MEMBER OF
J W JAGOE JR I1667 197E TEXAS TiTIE
J W JAGOE 114 ASSOCIATiON
JAGOE ABSTRACT COMPANY, INC.
FOUNDED IN IBSS BY JUDGE JOSEPH A CARROLL
OPERATED SINCE I67A AS JAGOE ABSTRACT COMPANY P 0 Box 267
DENTON TEXAS 70201
ISSUING AGENT FDA
AREA CODE 617~302 9021,
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY CO
January 6, 1989
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
My name is J.W. Jagoe III. If have lived in Denton for Seventy-Five years
and am familiar with the various streets and roads in the area. I have
spent over forty years in the land title business.
Changing the name of Pockrus Road would be a disservice to the Community.
The Pockrus family has lived on this road for more than One hundred
years. They have always contributed to the growth and enhancement of this
area.
Please do not change the name of Pockrus Road.
i
Sincerely,
J. JA
S
V~
{
"POCKRUS ROAD" PETi rION
We, H.W, "Pete" and Alice Pockrus, wish to keep "Pockrus Road'
named as is: "Pockrus Road". The road was named after consi-
deration and vote of a committee formed for that purpose by
The Commissioners of Denton County when Edd Elbert was
in office, and we find no cause or reason to change the name
from "Pockrus Road". 1
We have lived here and owned this property since 1945, ,We
owned and operated our business and raised both our children here.
They were born here and both attended grade school, high school,
and college.
Pete's grandfather lived at the other end of "Pockrus Road",
near Shiloh Cemetery, where they moved when they came to Texas
from Alabama. They both lived there until they died,
Pete"s Father, Will, D. Pockrus, owned 173 acres on Shady
Shores Road and across 135E where parts of Denton State School
and Oakmont Estates are now located. Will Pockrus was 84 when
he passed away.
The Pockrus home is easy to find, the road is easy to find, J
and is well-known and established in the community. y
J
i
i
f
I
i
i
71,
s_~~e a~.- ~ 1I
y~ G V-~[-i /!~-aJ') gr~CJ`'si.C,r.`~ U/LP 2d 3+N ~ y-CA?~,c~! 11
~ '/A-C►~TC.-~ 1.6'x"-- '~'~J'O ~ (1 ' ~iu» .cL~- / ~~-e- ~r~ I
~ ~ ~ G(./-tar ~ 4Y `itL h /~GC- pfd il.G~
~C• C Ic L A ~o u Q .p `71te r. G
.tits ~n !/e~ r-a-aLG~.~ w ~%'1 L~►*-4e~ /
tee-
OT- J I
x,/~
40
HAARV DUNCAN
7607 WOOOBNOOK 6T. 1 119%,
OEN70N,T%.70206
/01- L
J
1
/ 1
- - -
r
1718E
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PROVIDING FOR THE
NAMING OF A PUBLIC STREET SITUATED IN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of
Denton, Texas has recommended that the road previously referred
to or called "Pockrus", "Paige" or "Page" Road, be formally
named and designated as Page Road; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determine that
said road should be designated as Pockrus Road; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
i E
SECTION I. That the road located within the City of Denton
and extending from its intersection with the I-35E Service Road
j to its intersection with Swisher Road and previously referred to
as "Pockrus", "Paige", or "Page" Road, be formally named and
designated as Pockrus had,
SECTION I1. That the City Council authorizes and directs
that the official map of the City of Denton be amended to show
the street designation approved.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately uon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of N1987.
' ari O
CITY O DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
Q~~.Jb (1)alh4
1 CIT F DE TON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY- L~a7zez
r
I
2 City of Denton City Council Minutes
March 10, 1987
Page 22
I The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Brian Burke, Metroplex Engineering, spoke in favor of the request.
He stated that the owner was requesting the annexation, After
annexation, the owner wanted to proceed with zoning and residential
development of the property, it was an extension of property
I already annexed.
` No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
' Cecil* Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this was a voluntary
annexation request by Teasley Road Associates. It was in conjunc-
tion with an annexation which was approved and requested by Teasley
Road Associates last year. There was construction occurring' on that on fo Councilion that tracts This wash a continuationaoppr f their p the
City
the area. There was no existing land uses on the roperty, property he
owners did anticipate a zoning request in the near future. There
were three reply forms mailed to property owners - 1 returned in
favor, 0 in opposition. The next public hearing was scheduled for
March 17, 1987.
Consensus of the Council ras to continue with the annexation
schedule.
9. The Council held a public hearing to determine the
correct name for Paige/Pockrus Road.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Lucy Jones spoke in favor of the recommendation of the Planning and
` Zoning Commission. She was the manager of the Sherwood Mo
{ Park which was on the road in question. bile Home
she was in favor of
` changing the name of the road to Page Road. She stated with all the
chanyss of the name, people were losing their mail and that it was
very confusing.
Council Member Alexancer asked Ms. Jones which spelling she wanted
the road to be - Page or Paige.
Jones dio not have a preference as long as it was Page/Paige.
Mrs. H.W. Pockrus spoke in opposition to the recommendation. She
stated that her family had owned t
Page/Pockrus from he property in the area o
1945. She stated that in 1976, the County
Commissioners named the road Pockrus Road, signs were in place as
1 Pockrus Road and maps had been made with Pockrus Road, She felt
that it would be very expensive to have to change all those signs,
t
etc, The Historic Commission had agreed with the name of Pockrus.
I .
I
L
23
City of Denton city council Minutes
i March 10, 1987
Page 23
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey, Urban Planner$ stated that namQ of this road had been
a problem for people living on Paige/Page/Pockrus Road. The road
was annexed into the City in 1985. The traffic engineering division
posted signs with the name of Pockrus Road which corresponded with
the name which was on the official County Road Map. The last
official name designated by the County Commissioners Court in 1976
was Pockrus. The County Historical Committee recommended Pockrus at
i that time also. The City did have the authority to change the name
since it was in the City limits. The Historical Landmark Commission
I recommended to retain the name of Pockrus Road. The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended the name of Page Road. Staff had no
particular recommendation other than to get the issue resolved one
i way of the other.
Mayor Stepnens asked Spivey how the "i" got in the Paige version of
I the road name.
l Spivey replied no one seemed to know how it got in there.
h The following ordinance was considered:
r c NO. 87-039
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTONj TEXAS PROVIDING FOR THE
NAMING OF A PUBLIC STREET SITUATED IN THE CORPORATE LIMITS
Of THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
r DATE.
i
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to have the name of the road be
Pockrus Road. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alpxander "aye#"
Hopkins "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and
Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
6. Consent Agenda
I Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agenda
A, Bids and Purchase Orders:
' I
11 Bid 19703 - Dry Type Transformers
2. Bid 19707 - Electric Motor
3. Bid 19711 - Oils and Greases
y
i ,i
r~
DATE: 03/10/81
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORKAT
TO: Kayor and Kembers of the City Council
FROK: Lloyd Harrell, City Kansger
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAKING OP PAGE/POCKRUS ROAD J
RECOKKEKDATION:
At its Meeting of January 28, 1967, the Planning and Zoning
Commission voted to recommend that Page Road be approved as the
correct now of Paige/Pockrus Road.
S IR4SIl T s
This is a request from property owners in the area to determine the
correct new of Paige/Pockrus Road from its intersection with
Interstate Highway 359 to its intersection with Swisher Road.
BACKGROUND:
E I i
V This road was named Pockrus Road in 1976 by an act of the
Commissioners Court. Vheo the road was annexed into the city in
1985, street signs were posted identifying the street as Pockrus
Road. Property owners along the road protested this action and
requested that the City determine the correct now for the road.
~ I
E PROGRAMS, DBPARMMTS OR GROUPS AFF9CTED:
{ 1
Property owners along Page/Pockrus Road +
j
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not applicable +
Reppeotfully submitted:
i
Lloyd Harrell
Prepared by: City Kanager
Denise Sp ve
Urban Planner
Appr ed
Jeff Key
Director of Planning
and Development
04390
I
r
i
I
I
.Kr
CITY OI DflNTOIM, TMS MUNlC1PAL 8UIL01N0 / 215 E. MCKINNEY SL / OEN TON, TEXAS 76201
i
KRMORANDUM
M DATg: March 4. 1987
TO: Denton City Council
I FROM: Doniae Spivey, Urban Planner
SUBJECT: Paige/Pockrus Road
In 1985, Paige/Pockrus Road was annexed into the City of Denton. After
consulting the Denton County Map, the Traffic gnglneering Division posted
signs identifying the street as Pockrus Road. This action generated a storm
of protest from residents of the area who believe that Paige Road is the
correct name for the street. In researching the matter, staff determined that
the street was officially named in 1976. At that time, the Denton County
Commissioners Court asked the Denton County Historical Survey Committee to
` suggest names for all county roads that did not already have names. The list
of proposed road name was posted and ninety days were allowed for public
comment. The Commissioners Court approved the list of proposed names, In-
cluding Pockrus Road, on September 13, 1976. Since the road is now in the
City limits, the City has the authority to renew the road, if necessary. In
an effort to resolve this matter, the road name issue was presented to the
Historic Landmark-Comnission which voted to retain the name Pockrua Road.
After a public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend
that the road be named Page Road.
1 Denise Sp ve '
ka
0300k
I I
ik
I
81715W200 01FW METRO 194.2520
1
1
44
CLL
o sH 9ti et ~a 1 At `~i rresa
1 ! P J C 9 V 4 4c
CLAIN SA*S. p f. I 4. k f f'4c
rNiA Tt $33.714 Ac R 84-SAC ANN; a rAAX \
AaCO IAIC. ~n b h Q~ e A
j >t e41~ A
4 Z'sT 00 r nI.B M. 1N r4 Ac
01. ►rA IA AA. rs ~q = Z o
RO MY r a *~2 a 4SJAr. 07J 8 It,
A16I
"VON ♦ city -4 N i4
h S r RT A * 117 A&. u ~ yy
PlSeArI► avAlr A . 1. t u e ` x I ON
~qk s/1.~'r4 Z# I AC ss Aa 4 2 n
1. r r R • q
La It,
sotofN ~T.IAL 116 h V v t
r'rMu L[ = v a, l 00 ! vw CrrY Oil oa ro
h by Jt7At ~ e
fy 1. VAc • AI J$046 rAAJ n, Pv~
yo L14 Ac r At ~ 0
8 3S•1/1 4 J~4
Jr J.~ \4~ t awb 1 oirR C. JULLVAN P ~ rf,
31 Ni 9 4c C~NNROO
48 r As w 41-044. 111.4 040.
t rI-1Ar a,20dc. rair we. 44 W. G AAYM~U- 14+1/Mr!
a
At K sa / c
soa 8404
'M IReC{M
A, J/sn it rs. 4ii
Air- .f As }"i 3 A~it~ psvA. ° ► w
0 tt.7tA.. !IA►~!r •"r .a s4,0A@ Z48,,
TI+u oNt,S a J,s P fI1At af4 w Mr fNC. ~ 3: JAIAC
as ; r r t bIVfLL n s. r
IJ'Ir, ILA • IAs h It, At Y 8 A4 lN~ R 3 r 90 CowF~r I#.*
AVMNR r1 \
y* V ce.sf J, ! tJ SAc ~ 77.7 & IA.LAr t11 A•
Y
s 1 BIANAB A.
7k Il YY Q'aJfh y r~ ~rs.r amr 10.4
Q • L. WILL
rrw.J~ t. ' Z n ~Q iesTlh1 I d
134 Ac
Q P IGE_/ POCKRUS
\y~ A A V 54 a • Mr 8. M.1, Uwe Co.
,f v ~4\1 Z V i. ' se r a.
p! PA N SS,! As, C 29 irvsw•et 1986 0
Ib
• h r . Ar.
41 GFNION e ; Y M.
ooL y ~ wiibR r
i•. P tr Jre JOA4 At r
U « r ~A Y Y $ i~
If r1o "NO
I,fAs i4lA, ,4Arr rr q~0911 Ac L a V
s 4
~ rrAr a c a>re. INC. ~ e~' 1 a 1~ Aa ~ r ~Q
LA.ArYtlooiJI'b S11Ar ~b\ MCANCRICK lrAc \`1 T' '
iicwl gs +Arrr ~JAc J~6 A4111. I ' C
,rwARr •
• + nron M iO \Ah\ Z Q\gOt, ;d +Y r rsAc
4`4 bAa ~ oc > r r t `~NrPit. , GPQ \yAy ~Z la A Jrra a
M r e ♦ 4fe P Y rL0 2JAe
It %c K N r s v 9 /k. aft PrxJAr
O ry,Y V It
p-M ; > P Z o
~i v N 0\~ TA. Ir f
Jet. .1 4~ Y " J 0 a * a` MJCt2J CtMSit
c, h~ x O . r
°
> ~tiA.e00 P ~N.l l4 Q'\g y s ti FOe'0~ t J A
ornn I> O g rrworT F. J.
a a~J ~Q~ a wf~
0
As, 21.2 R 7f1. 1 r. .
1 It j, R L Td GYr 14 II..,, [u. ILOT
•r.vrrsr, TrlAc aIANONrT rJT. O147p1i i P AL(~CM1R Jfllt IP !Ac r
I
I
~ r
p p Z Minutes
i January 2B, 1987
Page 8
STAFF REPDRi: Ms. Spivey stated that even though most
Lenton Developwent Guide policies have been at, staff has
some reservations about the capacity of the day care
center. She said that while a day care center may be a
needed neighborhood service, one accommodating two hundred
children cannot be effectively blended into the area with-
out damaging the character of the neighborhood. The poten-
tial noise and traffic impact of such a large number of
children could be detrimentlal to the neighborhood. She
,aid a day care center accommodating Z00 children In terms
of traffic analysis is more of a commercial type use and
is not the least intense most logical land use for this
area which is over the intensity standard. She added that
staff recommends denial of Z-18S1.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Edwards stated that their traffic analysis
shows that they will have the level of service A which is
- the best rating in terms of traffic. He said that 200
children will not be delivered at one time to this site.
He said that the overall intensity has already been viola-
ted but that they have made sure that the capacity of the
road system is adequate. He said that he felt this is a
very needed facility in an area which is growing.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Claiborne stated that there is certainly
cons eration of Infiltration of a neighborhood with m
commercial establishment. He said that this is a change
of land use from residential to a commercial use. He said
that with the elementary school wtthln the vicinity there
will be a potential traffic impact with another 100 chil-
dren. He said compatibility of land use is consistent with
the school in the area. He said the use is a neighborhood
service but the site is a consideration.
Ms. Brock stated that this project has the nature of a
commercial enterprise rather than neighborhood service.
Ms. Brock moved to recommend denial of Z•1851. Seconded
by Ms. Cole.
Mr. Escue stated that if it were not for the fact that the
Intensity is over the standard in the area this would be
an admirable project and he would like to see this type ok
development.
Vote was called and motion carried (5.1). Mr. G1a.borne
- voted no.
Mr. Holt returned to the meeting.
E. CORRECT NAME FOR PAIGE/POCBRUS ROAD.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Spivey stated that in 198S, Paige/
Me ru lE"a was annexed into the City of Denton. She
said after consulting the Denton county Map, the Traffic
Engineering Division posted signs identifying the street
as Pockrus Road. She said that this acts on generated a
storm of protest from residents of the area who believe
that Paige Read is the correct none for the street. In
researching the utter, staff detetalned that the street
was officially named in 1978. She said that the tenton
county commissioners Court asked the Denton County Histor-
Ical S urvey Committee to suggest names for all county roads
that did not already hale names. The list of proposed road
names was posted and ninety days were allowed for public
comment. The Commissioners Court approved the list at
proposed names, including POCkrw Road, on September 13,
1976. Since the road is now in the city limits, the city
I
`i
V
i
P b Z Minutes
January 29, 1987
Page 9
has the authority to rename the road, if necessary. In an
effort to resolve the matter, the road name Issue was pre-
sented to the Historic Landmark Commission which voted to
retain the name Pockrus Road. The Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation on this matter will be for-
warded to the City Council for final disposition of this
issue.
Ms. Brock asked if the road is legally Pockrus Road.
Ms. Spivey said yes. Ms. Brock asked how people are
getting their mail. Ms. Svey said that thn postal
service has changed from tpiae to time.
Mr. Claiborne asked if there were signs that designated
the road as Paige Road. Ms. Spivey said yes but the signs
have been changed from time to time. Mr. Claiborne asked
who erected the signs. Ms. Spivey said originally the
county erected the signs. She said for a period of time
there were no signs. She said after annexation the city
erected the Pockrus Road sign. She stated that there was
some confusion and name has been changed back and forth
since.
j Mr. Kamman asked if Paige was the older of the two names.
Ms. Spivey said yes.
Ms. Carson asked for the current sign name. Ms. Spivey
said Pockrus.
CITIZEN COMMENTS: Prances Gregg, property owner, stated
that she purchased 23 acres in this area. She said that
she operated a business in this area from 1973 to 1984 and
that she needed a street ntme to advertise the business.
She said that the city and county had no name and she was
told to talk to the old settlers in the area. She said
that while attending the trade days in the area she was
told that the area used to be Old Page Sown and was named
after Dr. Page who had lived in this area for years. She
said that Page was spelled like page in a book. She said
that the settlers said the road used to be named Harbert
Road when it was a dirt road. She said that she was told
to take information to the Historical Sect: because It
was their project. She said that she did submit inform&-
tien and was finally told that the name would be Pa{e Road
ofiieW ly. She said that the city did erect the first
sign and it has been changed back and forth several times.
Alice Pockrus, property owner, stated that she has lived
here for 1S years. She said that Paige Road goes to the
back of their place. She said that someone from Planning
Department called and asked what her husband would lake
the road to be named. He suggested Page Road because the
area used to be Old Page Town. She said that when the
Pockrus Road sign appeared they were thrilled. She said
that she felt there was no one left to remember the Old
Page Sown. She said that when the substation was built
the road was named Pockrus. She added that people move in
9 and out of the mobile Rome park and felt that it would not
matter to them. She said that she would like to see It
remain Pockrus Road if feasible.
Mr. Holt asked how long the Pockrus family has lived in
this area. Ms. Pockrus stated that her husband's father
lived in this area all his life.
r
Lucy Jones, Manager of Sherwood Mobile Home Park, stated
that this road name has caused a lot of confusion. She
said that the residents and she would like this resolved
and like to see the street named Page Road.
rA
t
P 6 Minutes
January 28, 1987
Page 10 yI
Betty Richmond, resident in Sherwood Mobile Home Park,
stated that her address used to be Rt. 7. Box 58 and that
she received a note from the ppost office after being an-
nexed that her address would Ee 5750 Paige Road. She said
that there has been considerable confusion. She said that
her address has changed four times in the eleven years that
she has lived here.
Ms. Richmond asked for those in favor of Page Road to
stand. Five people stood up.
Ms. Gregg stated that their plats have Page Road.
Ms. Pockrus stated that if it would help the people i,
this area, then name it Page 7nad. 1
l
~ Ms. Carson sated that staff has sugges;•d oA1ge/Pockrus
Road.
Mr. Clark stated that the "i" In the Paige is a mistako
and should be taken out,
Ms. Gregg asked that they make the road name easy, not
confusing,
Lhair declared public hearing closed.
dECISION: Mr. Clatborne stated that he would like to have
some method of encouraging recognition of the Pockrus name
i because the Pockrus family has been in 0e are, for years.
j Mr. Holt stated that he assumed the County Historical
Committee had some kind of data to name It Pockrus Road.
Sir. 6amman stated that It may not be that way.
e
Sir. Claiborne asked if the platted property had Page
Rcad. Mr. Clark stated that the older plats of the 30s
and SOs have Page Road.
Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend that the road be named
Page/Pockrus without the "I".
i
Motion died for a lack of second,
Mr. Holt moved to recommend that the road be named Pockrus
Road.
lotion died for a lack of second.
Mr. gammon moved to recommend that the road be named Page
Road. Seconded by Ms. Cole and motion carried unanimously
(7-0).
IV. CONSIDERATIONS
4 A. PRWORELkIMINARY PLAT OF THE EVERS PARS ADDITION, Lots l and 2,
I
Item was withdrawn by the petitioner.
B. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE NORTHRIDGE SUBDIVISION, Lots 4•9
an , Block .
{ STAFF REPORT: Mr. Clark stated that the area has a drain-
o age proofwhich affects the Northridge property owners.
he said that the ppreliminary prat is in order but staff
would like ■ condltlon that the drainage would be safely
handled without affecting property owners in the Northridge
Addition.
Inutes
Match 10, lvlo
Page 9
principle. He statedtthatrAel[orjsoconcitniliie /,overedi1
by this document.
Mr. Marina left tLe setting,
Mr. Lowry advised that Texas Historical Cosesslon has
publiead in 14
and repairs whhi ch page document on Construction standards
might be helpful for fine tuning,
advi Ad thatwCitdlfu0stdtoa slnuordinoacessllorieytempo
rary political sigons ofnll squire feet, a.11O I
concensus of commission to leave 11 at 1s. gum, t was
Roll call votes Miller Lowry, Boyd, Cenrady, Ficksy,
Matthews, Lawrence and ctoChraa voted aye, Motion carried
unanimously N •0),
i
Fickey left the sooting,
i cussion and approval of name of Paige/Pockrus good.
Ms Spivey stated that the street has beta known by both
nails, Paige and Pockrus. She sold in 1Y76 the Denton
County Historical Commission Came up with the name of
Pockrus. The peopple have called it Paige and the city has
always called it Paige since it was anaiaed. The city
assigned street numbers to Paira and people had addresses
c0.o shaadngedign ts so Pataigeff t was hem, : n Clty started to put up Paige
adrvi:•.ed that strait name should be
Pockrus, the added that many property owners are upset
about havin/ to change back to Pockrus. She spoke to
Yvonne Jenkfnt, also to the county staff, and information
that staff has is that the portion in the city and In its
cityawantsttoiRome it. Sheosaidnthat nMs, Jenkins whatever enot
have a problem with calling it Paget Road. Staff needs to
take something to Planning and ion }no commission and L'ity
Council and property owns n Who have Contacted staff want
street named Paige Road,
Mr, Lowry toD lalaed that County Commlislohers delegated
ahrathertlenitaro series County of H meetings, names we on Venerated
based on historic settlers. He said he didn't know whether
Pockrus was the correct name, be didn't taint It was. A
public heariar was held on courthouse lawn and some people
did object. Ht further stated he would like Paige but O l
historical records show Fockrus Road and he falls if tits
is going to annex property, it is city's obligation to
annex name a it exists.
re;ltedlthat a family established itmto Paigenor ?$i~@/
Pockruss.
l r~ niie8ohi fi*IsdCommissionsshouldpstickswith hDenton County
t Historical Commission and recommend name Pockrus to City
Council and to moved. Seconded by Mr. Lawrence.
Mr. Lowry advised that the name was established by
commissioners Court,
Mr, Boyd added that since Fockrus is legal name and Paige
was community nomed, he (4016 that Commission should stick
{ with Pockrus, that names should not be arbitrarily changed.
Roll all votes Miller, Lowry, Boyd, Coarady, Matthews,
Lawrence and Cochran voted aye, Motion carried unani-
mously (7.0).
Meeting adjourned at 6;10 p.m.
f
1718L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PROVIDING FOR THE
NAMING OF A PUBLIC STREET SITUATED IN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. +
Denton, TexasthasPrecommended that n the o road s previously referred
to or called "Pockrus", "Paige" or "Page" Road, be formally
named and designated as Page Road; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
i SECTION I. That the road located within the City of Denton
and exten ng from its intersection with the I-35E Service Road
to Its intersection with Swisher Road and previously referred to
as "Pockrus", "Pai$e'll or "Pagepl Road, be formally named and
designated as Page Road.
I
SECTION 11. That the City Council authorises and directs
that t e o c al map of the City of Denton be amended to show
the street designation approved.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
r
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of '
Ii 1487,
i
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
f
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAM[ DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
BY:
I
1D
CITY o(DENTON, rsXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
February 20, 1987
Dear Property Owner:
Subject: Paige/Pockrus Road
The De:,ton City Council will hold a public hearing at
7:00 p.m., on Tuesday, March 10, 1987, to consider the
correct name for Paige/Pockrus Road. This meeting will
be hold in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building,
which is located at 215 East McKinney Street. The Plan-
ning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the street
be named Page Road.
I ~
If you have any questions about this matter, please
contact me at 566-8350.
~ Sincerely, ~
~ Q1++tu Q~ak:7
Denise Spivey
Urban Planner
ab
i
fr~'
I
I
f I
4 1
Jl
4 '
CITY ofDENTON,TEXAS ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 16201 / TELEPHONE(817)566•a200
MEK)WDUM
DATE: January 21, 1987
TO: Planning and Zoning Comtiissioil
3
FROM; Denise Spivey, Urban Planner
SUBJECT; Paige/Pockrus Road
in 1985, Paige/Pockrus Road was annexed into the City of Denton. After
consulting the Denton County Map, the Traffic Engineering Division posted
signs identifying the street as Pock" Road. This action generated a storm
of protest from residents of the area who believe that Paige Road is the cor-
rect name for the street. In researching the matter, staff determined that
the street was officially named in 1976. At that time, the Denton County
Commissioners Court asked the Denton County Historical Survey Committee to
suggest names for all awnty roads that did not already have names. The list
of proposed road names was posted and ninety days were allowed for public
comment. The commissioners court approved the list of proposed names, in-
cluding Pockrus Road, on Septenber 13, 1976. Since the road is now in the
city limits, the city has the authority to rename the road, if necessary. In
an effort to resolve this matter, the road name issue was presented to the
Historic Landmark Coamission which voted to retain the Warne Pockrus Road. The
Planning to and Zoning council8 for 1 final disposition of mittcr be for-
rded
wa401
Denise Spi%" of
kn
} 0300k
I
i
i
1w
I
N O T I C E
i t
i
The Commissioners' Court of Denton County asked tho
Denton County Historical Survey Committee to take the project
i i
of naming all County roads that do not already have names.
The roads in Commisisoner's Precinct NO.Tw0 have been
I ~
naaed and proposed names posted this day of June, 1976.
objections and/or additional historical information should
M be registered with the Denton County Historical Survey Committee
within 90 days from June 7 ~ 1 1976 The Committee meets
C I
the first Thursday of each month at 300 P. M. on the let
floor of the Denton County Courthouse.
I
~ I
s 1
1
i
i
i
1
i
I
f r
,
PROPOSED NAMES rOR COUNTY ROADS IN COMMISSIONER'S PRECINCT NO TWO
1. M_yhlll Road - Customary name. Sotthern Continuation now called
Denton State School Road.
Pockrus Road.
7. Awleher Road.
e. Edwards Road.
S. roster Road - Early ettler. oldest nursery in county.
6. Orr Road. '
7. Shahan's Prairie Road - Old Set,ilauent name.
1. Lloyd Paid - Lloyd Ccmmunity has tvo general stores, a blacksmith
shop, cotton qin, white school, 8egro school, church and cemetery.
9. felt Branch Road - school located at Cad of present road.
10. Poison load - early family.
it. Gammon Aced - early rosily.
f 12. Doe Creek Road - creek.
I), Gabbs load - early settlers.
l
11A. Itatenslon from Preclnat 1)(Good Rope Road - Community.)
! ls. Panther Creek Read - Creek.
15, Rivkin@ Lane - early eattlemeat 119).
i ~
16. Smith Road - owned by Smith family since 1917.
I
11. Walker lane - Walkers have owned this land since 1902.
11. Rine Road - early settlers.
It. stark. Road - silly Settlers.
30. loothersaR Road - early settlers.
31. Newman Road.- e&vly settlers.
Ross Lann - Settled by Rose to 1110.
mackberry Road - early settlement and school.
36. Nestle Lane.
31. Griffin Resd - your Griffin brothers bale Owned land along this
read since lot?.
26. ]Net40y trail - early Settler from which came the sue Caney
C40aonity.
37. Crowder Read early settlers,
31. yswtth Army K4009141 Road - to World War It Denton men veto
I
mebilteed :n the fourth Army District. This road monorlafi9ea
their sacrifices.
i
i
J
( 9
e4
(
29. Acker Lena,
70. Crantu Road - old settlers.
31. Stewart, Creek Road - early sett] rent 1444 and C946k-
I1. Teel Road - early settlement, 1130.64.
33, ru2ua Read - early owners of land,
7-1. Nateen Lane.
73. 1211 Road.
76- arks load,
37. (Non extant)
h
I. 74. Continuation of
eparke Read.
If. MOrcen Road - early eettlsr.
' 40. (Non extant)
41. Ritter need,
e 11
INOn eatantl
h
11. (NOS extant)
` H. Sri12ea Settlement Road - oldest settlement in county.
I IS, roller Nill Read - early settlers and landholders.
<1. Patera colonw Reaa - historical early settlement.
j 47. (NOn extent)
i~ If, cemetery 21_11044 traditional aue.
49- Midway load, - traditional name,
S0. Relford 18 prairie Read - early settlement,
31. orlses Sottlemeat Read - traditional name,
31. Deatoa Tea Rse4.
51- Mlloy parkway in Lewisville)
fl- (old orchard Road In Lewisville)
sS. (Boyd Gill Road in Lwtowille)
!1. Lrna demo first settlers is 0ar04■ CosuaeaLty.
47. Rarseamen Wee - early settler.
ff. >llrrer Was - old family and aateler Ln Coppell ages,
ff. larSnaeht Lane - early settler in Garman reusnity.
40. yeeker Lame - early settler is fersas eommoslty.
11. Dwwe Lane - early settler in German sousaity.
62. Ri_ of Rcad (194044 by reactaet 11.
61. (State Highway 401)
44. ^hian Cha~__pal ~tea~ traditional Same.
41. ftMMIF"**4 - old settlers.
•1-
t€
f Y
i
R
66. Continuation of Old Alton Road.
67. Orchid will Lane - already named.
66. old Alton Road SNamed by Praoinet 3).
66. Hickory Creek Road (Hamad by Prsclnce 31.
70. Ryan Reid - Part In City Limits of D sa.an and balance named
i
Ayer. Road by Precinct 3.
71. Beene Lana (Named by Precinct 3, however is Inside City Limits
of Denton and called lenders by Denton)
71. Nowlin Road - early settlers. '
73. Robinson Road.
76. Shady $Korea Road - Customary name.
75. Carth load.
76. Nord Road.
i
17. Whitmore Road.
i
1S. (Inside City Limits)
76. Hill Lane.
10. trench Settlement Road early settlement, 1.657.
i 61. Dickson Lane - first elected city Ju44e.
13. Ring Lane - first white settler in Little elm area.
13. Oarsa Lana - traditional community.
16. Lonesome Dove Road - early church.
65. Witt Road.
3306'9
$6050'16
i
A e 6 7 - a?M+>.rrwa,s.~.tu-e l:O~ee.r.~ u..
~(tt eel - .
a
-3-
111444441111144'111 1 11 !'1
I I
I
I I
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
r
f
s
r
DATE: 02/21/99
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
F.20M: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUAUECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY ALONG THE ELM FORA OF
THE TRINITY RIVER (A-58) I
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommenda approval of the annexation.
j SJMMARYI
This annexation would complete the extension of the City limits to
Lake Ray Roberts. A letter has been sent to the property owners
requesting consent for a voluntary annexation of a 100' strip. An I
involuntary annexation would require a minimum 1#000' strip.
(
I
BACKGROUND: j
The City of Denton has annexed property in this area over the past
11I
4 years in an attempt to control water quality and subdivislon of
propetty.
I
PROGRAMS# DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Thirteen property owners would be affected by this annexation,
including the corps of Engineers.
FISCAL IMPACT: l
City services must be provided within the city limits. The costs 1
would be minimal because of the width of the annexation.
JRetfully su Z tted: ~
,i
Prepared by: L yd V. Harrell
4-b " City Manager
Cecile Carson
I Urban Planner j
~
Apr ed:
i
L
rank H. Robbins
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
2414a
ANNEXATION A-SE WIDTH
NORTH
r
y1~ 9` W~ ~y6 L
v P'L ll.2.le,. O
P
a ~
6 94.7 At
uaP
err 1• f
QY o r r r.r c
f SP 6S~Ac
I7 SR. .,1~ r
rsot
t. t S:IR N
y = V C#A S. Alc
pljAvro rie 1.. N J[ N Ill.
of j JO A. BURGER y b \ in
v
rrx 77.2 A.
40
I 1 . e urger 0. • R"~ /e ui t7lAt P y
k r MINNIS P\ /v --7 r. IOAs O Ac. 1
Y M Ac J1 Ac.
n JACK
JOHN PORriR At/TO MRYA+G ES OfAry
c Id t ~P l' 3JAe r 1I3.1Ae /23 As. Afl/lNe
BOBBY McDOWELL rt ~II
14.4o ft 1
P /07Aa ° 96.! fRe q' 30Ae r.
20 A At m 40 Ac
!0 Aa.
d . i1 30Aa at.1AtlY f a
avANa /O At. CK a^1Y r 21.aAt 90.0 At, 71
20.A, at
1
IoAc. eA6Gi FARM) ae IC ?N. YINAOLS J
I2ASAe
AAAC ft 146 Ac R. N. Yih
I PRO OSED rep.
rJ?,Arrem CITY LIMITS
c
?S19At PRESEM
fr DAYS MAYWfifY LCiTY LIMITS
6, it AL 1/0 At
70 At '
PIAPAMN
1 DS N t
4 lilAt 0.0. 8IA7Y 26 At
r
02. A A4 70 S AC
AtiPE r• 2f r NrR + 1 ty
r Ad
elrA c y
te.iA. /AYL1R A! N VZNAeLI A. AOLr
At474t e.l uaLr Y~ r y Y
J R At Vh t,~ h~
e J
Q4Qcy 1. A t At fk
I PT
ANNEXATION A-SS TH NO
RTH
31.2Ac
P 96.7 Ad
ar1.P
\ ~ A"1
•n. v C
P P . 66.i Ac
2►J Ai~
CHAS AA:
I 122.
° i JOMN ro,PT[R
AUTO ,/0 A.8URGfR At in
5
10/4 At 772Ae, A
b
/0 YI 22 At
0 A41AINIS P /OA cf, Q 30
< 74 Ar. 1• LACK
A ~ MA GfS
I ~ JOHN PORTER ER AM TO ONA T Y
~I I d 113.3Ae rl
/2! Ad. ALIf7NtR
N 3SAC 90 BY McDOWCLL •qq4 ~ 14•4o!a
G ti » u u • Nt § Ac H' 30 A c
14TAc 96J 3 41 At
P 0
241 At „ ' tt
ee4r V1 l
l0Ae JOAe
1 6 10 I At
f u
VA Ct n,i 203A
IUs N At. lV r of
10 Ar. LAul iAPAlJ , alr.. 124.5 Ac op. N. V!A
all IT41 ISAe x 146 APROP08ED .~°4t 1r1.
olgi *2Y r A J ° CITY LIMITS
~VPRESENT.
i 7S44Ae CITY LIMITS
oAV! MAracRRV
u
h 4, t►AG I/O At
• 1.
F ( 78 At AIRMAN SM/TN r 1
+ OR" ISS At 0.D. AZAI'V 2i At
14.3 Ac
102. t Ac r.
4A, i Nil 1 1 A 4 1
h , 2f
cAau
irut4 9~ r
$'Al /AVtOR R. N V[NAtcf SAc R yy~ , c. r
f0 AS1,7 At UOGC yN pl
Ac'
M.
a 4.4 Al • k
0 S Q
war .r.~~ i
~1f
` I
f
i
I
71011
i
I
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
A-S8
I
i January 17, 1989 City Council eats date, time and
place for public hearings
January 22, 1989 Notice published in Denton Record
Chronicle for first public hearing
February 7, 1989 City Council - first public hearing
February 10, 1989 Notice published in Denton Racoci
Chronicle for second public hearing
i February 219 1989 City Council - second public hearing
February 22, 1989 Planning and zoning Comalasioa makes
recosnendation
March 16, 1989 City Council institutes sanesation
j Special Called Muting
March 170 1989 Publication of ordlaance in Denton
Record Chronicle
! I
April 18, 1989 Final action by City Council
3
f 6
I ,
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED_AREA, c1TY OF DENTON, TEXAS
1. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine
the present
will police be services
provided on using
B. Fire
Fire protection by the present personnel and equipment of
the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation.
C. Water/Wastewater
Maintenance of public water and wastewater facilities will
begin within sixty (60) days after the effective date of
the annexation for all facilities required to be maintained +
by the City of Denton.
1
D. Refuse Collection
The same regular refuse collection service now provided ,
f within the City will be extended to the annexed area within
sixty (60) days after the effective date of annexation.
E. Streets
I
1. Emergency
chuckholes, measures maintenance streets (repair fflow, etc.), hazardous
will begin on the affective date of annexation.
2. Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present
City, will begin In the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation,
3. Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installation
of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and
gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need
therefore is determined by the governing body, will be
accomplished under the established policies of the City.
P d. Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and
E other traffic control devices will binstalled as athe
nd
need therefore is established by appropriate
traffic standards.
F. Inspection Services
Any inspection services now provided by the City (building,
electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will
begin in the annexation area on thr; effective date of
annexation.
I
7
I
4
Service Plan
Annexed Area
Page 2
G. Planning and Zoning
The planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City will
extend to the annexed area on the effective date of
annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass
the annexed area and a zoning designation for the
property will be established.
41. Street Lighting
- Street lighting will be installed in the substantially
developed areas in accordance with the established
policies of the City.
` I. Recreation
I Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effective
date of annexation. The same standards and policies now
used in the present City will be followed in expanding the
recreational program and facilities in the enlarged City.
J. Electric Distribution
The. City recommends the use of City of Denton for new
electric power.
K. Miscellaneous
Street name signs where needed will be installed within
approximately six (6) months after the effective date a
annexation.
II. Capital Improvements Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City is prioritized by such policy guidelines
as:
A. Demand for services as compared to other areas based
s
partly on density of population, magnitude compared to other areas, established technical standards
and professional studies, and natural or technical re-
straints or opportunities.
B. Impact on the balanced growth policy of the City.
C. Impact on overall City economics. i
The annexed area will be considered for CIPin the upcoming
CIP plan. The annexation area will be Judged according the same established criteria as all other areas of the City. 1
i
1
t
r'
a
2612L
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT:
The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
proceeiings to alcer the boundary limits of said City to add the
territory described in Exhibit A , attached hereto and
incorporated by reference herein, to the corporate limits of the
City of Denton.
A Public Hearing will be held by an efore the Ctty Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of ,
1989, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the CityZ`ouncil Ch am ers tfia
i Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
personsappear
place all allh said persons have eallright
intere interested in
heard. O
the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, on thVLq day of
1969, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City CounciI Chambers o t e
Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all p sons
interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and
place all such persons shall have the right to a pear and be
r heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in
the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
ATTEST:
J . IF R , RET
i
A-58
I
ww
EXHIBIT "A"
ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situited in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part
of the M. McBride survey, Abst. No. 804, W. Tanzy survey Abst.
No. 1253, S.A. 3 M. G. R.R. Survey, Abst. No. 1228 and more
fully described as follows:
BEING a strip of land 1,000 feet in width and containing
approximately 310.5678 acres or land more or less, said 1,000
foot strip lying 500 feet on each side of the centerline
described below;
BEGINNING at a point lying in the centerline of the Elm Fork of
the Trinity river, said point lying 434.43 feet, mere or less,
southeast of +ne northwest corner of a tract conveyed from
Daniel M. Mahoney Realtors, Inc. to D.M. Mahoney/O.S. Royalty
Joint Venture by a deed dated January 30, 1981 and recorded in
Volume 1058, Page 603 of the Deed Records of Denton County
Texas said point also lying in the east boundary line of a
tract conveyed from J.W. Porter to Eagle Farms, Inc. by a deed
dated July 191 1979 and recorded in Volume 963, Page 734 of the
DRDCT;
THENCE northwesterly along the west boundary line of said
Mahoney Tract and the east boundary line of said Eagle Farms,
Inc. Tract the following two courses and distances, il) north
130 15' 59" west a distance of 252.74 feet; (2) north 400
05' 18" west, 181.69 feet to the westerly northwest corner of
said Mahoney Tract and the southerly southeast corner of Tract
II as conveyed from Scenic Joint Venture to E.L. Hughes and Ray
Lynch by a deed dated December 30, 1986 and recorded in Volume
2062, Page 311 of the OROCT;
THENCE northerly the following 12 courses and distances along
the west boundary line of said Hughes Tract and continuin
along the east boundary line of said Eagle Farms Tract,
north $50 6' west 169.0 feet; (2) south 830 03' west, 303 2
feet, (3) south 370 6' west, 393.0 feet; (4) south 650 16'
west, 236.7 feet; (5) north 60 40' west, 400.2 feet; (6)
north 70 46' east, 336.6 feet; (7) north 800 22' east,
597.4 feet; (8) north 310 53' east, 149.6 feet; (9) north
40 10' west, 102.9 feet; (10) north 630 02' west, 1,153.2
feet; (11) north 90 46' west, 231.2 feet; (12) north 180
18' east, 109.2 feet to the northwest corner of said Scenic
} Joint Venture Tract and the northeast corner of said Eagle
Farmi Tract said point also being the southwest corner of a
tract of land conveyed from Charles D. Hall to Clyde A.
Blakeley, Jr. and wife Minnie B. Blakeley by a deed dated
and recorded in Volume 533, Page 434 of the
January 10, 1966
DUCT and being the southeast corner of Tract One as conveyed
from Scenic Joint Venture to E. L. Hughes and Rey Lynch by a
deed dated December 300 1986 and recorded in Volume 20620 Page
311 of the DRDCT, said point also lying in the centerline of an
east/west public road known as McKinney Bridge Road;
i
' 4V
11/{1
I
THENCE northerly the following 4 courses and distances along
the centerline of said Eln Fork same being the west boundary
line of said Tract One and the east boundary line of said
Blakeley Tract, (1) north 180 18' east, 180.6 feet; (2) north
50 36' east, 420.0 feet; (3) north 420 21' west, 282.8
feet; (4) north 210 16' 30.0' west, 217.14 feet to the
northwest corner of said Tract One and the northeast corner of
said 8lakeley Tract said point also lying in the north boundary
line of said McBride survey, Abst. No. 804 and the south
boundary line of said Tansey Survey, Abst. No. 1253, said point
also being the southwest corner of a tract conveyed from Daniel
H. Evans and wife, Barbara Evans to Bobby G. McDowell and wife,
Bobbie B. McDowell by a deed dated December 1, 1917 and
recorded in Volume in 875, Page 783 of the DRDCT and the
southeast corner of a tract conveyed from John T. Campbell to
Charles W. McCallum by a deed dated August 2, 1960 and recorded
` in Volume 458, Page 362 of the DRDCT for corner;
THENCE northerly the following 2 courses and distances, along
' the centerline of said Elm Fork same being the west boundary
line of said McCallum Tract and the east boundary line of said
McDowell Tract (1) north 50 30' 30' west, 198,55 feet; (2)
north 80 22' 30" west, 867.94 feet to the northeast corner of
said McDowell Tract and the southeast corner of a tract of land
conveyed from Sam Evans, et al to John W. Porter Auto Sales
1 Inc., by a deed dated August 23, 1971 and recorded in Volume
627, Page 539 of the DRDCT for corner;
THENCE northerly the following 7 courses and distances along
the centerline of said Elm Fork continuing along the west
boundary line of said McCallum Tract and the east boundary line
of said John Porter Auto Sales Inc. Tract, (1) north 140 3'
30" east, 230.9 feet; (2) north 470 55' 30.0" east, 142.3
feet; (3) north 650 17' east, 260.3 feet; (4) north 170 18'
30" east, 285.3 feet; (5) north 120 2' west, 309.8 feet; (6)
north 70 39' west, 357.9 feet; (7) north 200 20' 15' west,
33 feet to the northeast corner of the remainder of the John W.
Porter Auto Sales Inc. Tract and the southeast corner of a
tact conveyed from John W. Porter Auto Sales, Inc. to Mike
Ramos by a deed dated September 10, 1984 and recorded in Volume
1530, Page 161 of the DUCT for corner;
THENCE northwesterly the following 2 courses and distances
along the centerline of said Elan Fork along the west boundary
line of said McCalluw Tract and the east boundary line of said
Ramos Tract, (1) north 200 20' 1S" west, 27.8 feet; (2) north
180 7' west, 252.0 feet to the northeast corner of said Ramos
Tract and the southeast corner of a tract conveyed from John W.
P Porter Auto Sales, Inc. to Susan Porter by a deed dated
September 100 1984 and recorded in Volume 1530, Page 147 of the
DRDCT for corner;
THENCE north 180 07' west along the west boundary line of
said McCallum Tract and the east boundary line of said Susan
Porter Tract a distance of 317.75 feet to the northeast corner
of said Susan Porter Tract and the southeast corner of a tract
conveyed from John W. Porter Auto Sales, Inc. to John A. Porter
by a deed dated September 10, 1984 and recorded in Volume 1523,
Page SOS of the DRDCT for corner;
i
I
THENCE northwesterly the following 3 courses and distances
along the centerline of said Elm Fork, same being the west
boundary line of said McCallum Tract and the east boundary line
of said John R. Porter Tract, (i) north 180 7' west, 13.05
feet; (2) north 170 49' 30" west passing the northwest corner
of said McCallum and the southwest corner of a tract conveyed
from Charles W. McCallum and wife Winnye 8. McCallum to the
United States of America by a deed dated November 18, 1981 and
recorded in Volume 1113, Page 158 of the DROCT and continuinj
for a total distance of 245.5 feet; (3) north 200 19' 30
west, 50.98 feet to the northeast corner of said John R. Porter
Tract and the southeast corner of a tract conveyed from John W.
Porter Auto Sales, Inc. to Vaughn Andrus by a deed dated
September 10, 1984 and recorded in Volume 1523, Page 501 of the
ORDCT for corner;
THENCE north 200 19 30" west along the centerline of said
Elm Fork, same being the west boundary line of said McCallum to
USA Tract and the east boundary line of sold Vaughn Andrus
Tract a distance of 343.12 feet to the northeast corner of said
Andrus Tract and the southeast corner of a tract conveyed from
John W. Porter Auto Sales, Inc, to Ann Andrus by a deed dated
September 10, 1984 and recorded in Volume 1523, Page 513 of the
OROCT for corner; '
THENCE north 200 19' 30" west along the centerline of said
Elm Fork, some being the west boundary line of said USA Tract
and the east boundary line of said Ann Andrus Tract a distance
of 377.33 feet to the northeast corner of sold Ann Andrus and
the southeast corner of a tract conveyed from John W. Porter 1
Auto Sales, Inc. to Betty Cochran by a deed dated September 10, j
1984 and recorded in Volume 1523, Page 517 of the DADCT;
THENCE northwesterly the following 2 courses and distances
along the centerline of said Elm Fork, same being the west
boundary line of said McCallum to USA Tract and the east
boundary line of said Cochran Tract, (1) north 200 19 30"
west, 202.87 feet; (2) north 270 43' 30" west, 387.0 feet to
the northeast corner of said Cochran Tract and the southeast
corner of a tract conveyed from Jo Ann Burger to the United
States of America by a deed dated October S. 1981 and recorded
in Volume 11071 Page 209 of the OROCT for corner;
THENCE northwesterly along the center of said Elm Fork same
being the west boundary line of said McCallum to USA Tract and
the east boundary line of said Burger to USA Tract a distance
of 868 feet to the northwest corner of sold McCallum to USA
} Tract and the northeast corner of said Burger to USA Tract,
said point also lying in the north boundary line of said Tansey
survey and south boundary line of said S.A. 8 M.G. R.R. Survey,
also being the southwest corner of Tract 216-1 as conveyed from
William E. Campbell Jr., et al to the United States of America
1 by a deed dated April 12, 1982 and recorded in Volume 1136,
Page 801 of the ORDCT and the southeast corner of Tract No. 213
as conveyed from John W. Porter et a1 to the United States of
America by a deed dated August 24, 1981 and recorded in Volume
10969 Page 787 of the OROCT for corner;
i
i ,
I` +
w-
THENCE northwesterly along the centerline of said Elm Fork same
USA Tract Aa Tract
distance
line of said Porter Campbell
the being East bowest undary boundary
of 2,678 feet to an angle point in the west boundary line of
said Campbell to USA Tract and the east boundary line of said
Porter to USA Tract, said point also lying in the west boundary
line of said S.A. 6 M.S. R.R. Survey and the east boundary line
of the K. Cox Survey, Abst. No. 291 for the Point of
Termination.
1
i
1
j
I 1
J
j 1
1
r
r
i
F
h
i
I
i
E
E
'ONE
I
i
k Jam. ~
2616L/1589
NO.
ORDINANCE
OF I MATERIALS, COMPETITIVE BIDS SUPPLIESN ORA SERVICES;
PURCHASE ACCEPTING
FOR
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS r8EREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
went, spplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
u
state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
serviceseasoshowneinithe " Bid hProposals" su Gbmitted therefor;iandor
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
ufunds to be p a rapthe proved rcahandseacocfethe
the appropriation
~ materialalssp , equipment, supplies or services
herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered
bids or materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in
the "Bi appro eddas beinglthe lowesteresponsible bidshforbsuchcitems: and
BID ITEM
NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
9868 1 Scientific Atlanta $69,900.00
9942 1 Commercial Body 26,422.00
r SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered items of the submitted bids, the Cityy accepts the offer
of the persons submitting the bids for sucitemosr and ogress in
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies servic
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
SECTION Iii. That should the City and persons submitting
approve an accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to
City Manager
enter into a formal and awarding of bids, 8 the result
acceptance, approvalr a
i
~ j
{
Y
1
or hi-3 designated representative is hereby authorized to execute
the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided
that the written contract is in accordance with the terms,
conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified
sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents
heroin approved and accepted.
SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
nunbere items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the smount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of February, 1989.
I
RAY STEPH ,
I
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, Mr= G MY
`
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: 7j
I4
I
PAGE TWO ,
1
i
t
fi
GATE: FEBRUARY 21, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council JlJ
FF.OM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager I
SUBJECT: DID q 9868 - RADIO CONTROLLED LOAD SWITCHES
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the award of this hid be extended to
3nclu2e an aJU1tIona1 1,000 units ?kt $69.90 each from Scientific
Atlanta. We also recommend approval of this bid for units
purchased through May of 1990.
SUMMARYr This bid was approved by Council on June 21, 1988, for an
nit al 1,000 units of radio controlled load switches. These are
the switches that allow the Electric Utility Department to
disconnect a consumer load, typically an air conditioner, as a
portion of the City of Denton load management program,
l BACKOROUNDs Tabulation sheet dated June 2, 1988, and letter from
Sc ent fft Atlanta dated February 7, 1989.
j PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Utility
Department "
FISCAL IMPACTt These switches will be funded from Electric Utility
bond Fu-Rs,+ Account #611-008-0253-9225. i
Respectf y submitteds
u
i Lloya" well _
City Manager
P pa red by s
Names Tom D. 3haw;~C;P;h(;
Titles Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approvedr
e#icai
i
u±
!ID 1 ! 4Bb8 I I I
I I I I
Ill Tiilf BADID COMiRpllE4 lOAD'$MIIEHfB• I LEN T. 1 SCIENTIFIC 1
I I
{ .........I IELQNEY I ATLANTA I I I
DPENEI JI1kE~7, ISB1 hl1~?. M. 1 I 1 I f
I
RCCOl1Ni 1 I
I I 1
611 d8 1153 9215 I I
I I
I.............. I 1 I I
1 I I1Y I HER DESCRIPTION f VENDOR I VENDOR T VENDOR 1 VENODA I
......i .....................................i............i.............. I I
T I I
1. II,IN EA IRA010 CONTROLLED LOAD 6MIICMES I 1 1 1
I I I 77.31 I 19.41 I 1
= I I I I I f
1 I I I I r I
I I I I I I I
f 1 I I
1 I I I f I
I I DELIVERY 11 DAYS I BC+11p I 71 1 I 1
t I 1 I I
FOB POINT I DENTON I DEN70N I 1 I
I I 1
1 1 I 1 I I
I I I 1 I ~ I
I I I f I 1 I
i I I I 1 I I
k I i I I I I
f f I I
f I I I I I I I
1
1 f
r
Y ,
~ e
FEB 07 '69 09:10 SCIDITIF1C HRarrl'r; rrn:,
x Sclentilic
At nta
Caned er11" 0~"' Ra 166031. AI M1, U W341. Tak W O 401 "1400., 7Wx 1l6166,OfS, 1*4 0611ne, IT1 4elipe~
February 71 1989
Mrs Richard Foster
Denton Municipal utilities
215 Es McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mrs Fosters
This is to verify that Sofentific-Atlanta will honor
the existing price of $69.90 for all radio switches
(Model Number DCU-1172A) ordered by Denton Municipal
Utilities through May of 1990. Refersnoe your bid
l number 9868.
We understand that your Load Management Program
quite successful, and we appreciate the business. is
1 Should you have any questions
at 404-449-2973, s please give me a call
V b st regards,
Sharpe oftiss
NntinnAi Rn AR "MI-n,tAOAr
Control systems Division
DSL/vb
i
E
r
r ~
3
t {
DATEi FEBRUARY 21, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMI Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUPJECTi BID# 9942 - AERIAL BUCKET DEVICES
RECOMMENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded as followsi
B13 item -1 To the lowest bid meeting specification, Commercial
Body in the amount of $26,422.00
Bid Item #2 - All bids be rejected and project rebid at a later
date.
SUMMARYt Thic bid is for the purchase of a 36' Aerial Bucket and
RITity Body to be mounted on a new truck furnished by the City of
Denton. This is a motor pool replacement.
i
Bid Item 92 - Several vezy good deme units are presently available.
We intend to revise specifications to allow demo units to be bid
and take advantage of the approximately $10,000 savings, '
i
BACKOROUNDt Tabulation Sheet
~I PROGRAMS2_DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt Electric Utility
Department and Motor Fool' Operatlons.
FISCAL IMFACTe This unit will be funded from 1988/89 Motor Pool
replacement funds 720-004-0020-8707.
I
Respect/ ly,/submittedi
Lloy~~^riarrell
City Manager I
Prepared bye
NameI Tom D, Shaw, C,P,M,
-1 Titled Assistant Purchasing Agent
i Approvedt
iv-171, ist Purchasing Agent
1
i J
~I
-
b >
3
I I E I I I I
BID 1 9942 E 1 1 1 1 I S I
BIP TITLE AERIAL PUCI'.E1 GEVJCES I THRUST I AZTEC I VEC I COK'IERCIAL I SENERAL 1 COASTAL I DAVIS I
..................................................1 UTILITY I INDUSIRIES I EQUIPMENT I BODY I CABLE I EQUIPKE47 I UTILITY I
CPEN'E0 FEORUARY 9, 1984 I I I I I i I I
I I I I I I
ACCOUNT 1 ~ E I I I 1 E I I
1 1 1 i 1 1 1 ._.........I
I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I
1 1 ply i ITEM DESCRIFI]ON I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I VEKPOR I VENDOR I
f ~
.......1 1.............. 1.............. 1...... 1.............. 1.............. 1.............. 1
I 1 I i I I 1 I I I I
I I I 1 IAERIAL BUCKEIIUIILIIY BODY 1 21,000.00 1 26,893.00 1 NB 1 26,122.00 1 1 41,12630 1 28,504.00 I
I I I I I I I 1 I 1
1 1 E KLA!I I AZTEC I I VERSALIFI I I REACH ALL i IECO I
I ~ I I i I I I 1 1 i I
I t I i I I I 1 i I
2 1 1 ;AERIAL OKK.EIVYAN TRUCK 1 I i 1 44,369.00 1 1 71,6911.00 1 62,602.00 1
I I I I I I I I I I
I I ALiERNAIE 41 1 1 1 319528.00 E 1 33,294.00 1 71,000.00 1 1
' I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I
1 I ALIERNAIE 12 1 1 1 40,994.00 I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I r I I
I 1 I I 1 I I I I
I IFOB GENI'ON I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I YES I
I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1
I I I I I 1 I S
~ I E E 1 I I I I I E
i 1
111, 1
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
E 1
I
~ I
I
i
I
i
i
I I
i
I
f
I
4
rA
y
2516L/t589
tic. 1
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY
PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN TH THE PURCHASESF FRO~f REQIJIRE14ENTSS FJSCOMOF STATE LAW PETITIVE
BIDS; SAND TPROVID
S UCH
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ING
WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain con-
--1 tracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an
amount exceeding $10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the
case of public cntamity where it becomes necessary to act at once
to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or
j to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to
protect the public health of. the citizens of the city, or in case
of unforeseen damage to public pro Art
NOW, THEREFORE, P- Y. machinery or equipment;
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
I
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby determines that there ;
Is a puSIlc calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to
appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to
preserve the property of the elty, or to protect the public health
of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage
to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason there-
of, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment,
supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase orders"
attached hereto, are hereby approved:
I
PURCHASE
ORDER N UIBER VENDOR
AMOUNT
89321 DAVI5 llTILITY ""_jNC,
- 4-L-L4.0~Qll~.
SECTION
11. That or des`ignated`employee eCinBehereby c authorgizedttohe puCity Maer
rchasenathe
materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the
attached Purchase orders and to make payment therefore in the
amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in
accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such
purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids.
I
J
1
s
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme at3~eTy upon its passage and approval. J
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989. l
i
E(AY~TEFF{EA'S ~ FfAY~ili' ~
ATTEST:
I
I
JEtJP~IF tE'i-'W1tL'I`E~I1'4'~~'~Ar`fiAAY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 1
I i
i
BY
I I
i 1
II
1
PAGE TWO
1
DATEt FEBRUARY 21, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Mem})ers of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT; FMERGENCY PURCHASE ORDER 689321 TO DAVIS UTILITY
HYD., INC.
RrCOMMENDATIONi We recommend this emergency Purchase Order,
X89321 tto Davis Utility Hyd., Inc. In the amount of $11,000.00 be
approved.
SUMMARY: This emergency purchase is for the repair of an Aerial
B-cVc and Utility Body, Rig #5222.
1 BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #89321
f PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Equipment Services
Account #710-025-0580-8710.
FISCAL _IMPACT: Equipment Services working capital funds for 1989.
I Respectf lyy submitted:
.lei
Lloy1c arrell
City Manager
c
Prepared by:
Name: - Ver,ise Manning
Title: Buyer
Approved:
;A -
/ Nam : Jah:z J. 4Sars al
fffiii Title: Purchasing Agent
004.DOC
~J
a 1
2
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
215 E. McKINNEY ST, PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201
P. O. NUMBER DATElVENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPE
89321 2/16/89 C14
DAV56000
VENDOR: SHIP TO:
Davis Utility Ilyd. Inc. Vehicle Maint.
P.O. Box 919 804 Texas St.
Lewisville, Tx 75067 Denton, Texas 76201
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, LINE AMOUNT
01 710 025 0580 8710 1 ea R1915222 Overhaul aeriel 11r000.00
unit per hi-ranger over-
haul specs & utility body
repair.
i
I
The City of Donlon, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. TOTAL P.O.
11,000.00
Reference P.O. Number en all IVL, Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments are F.O.B. Clty of Donlon, or as Indicated
Send Invoices T0: 01red All Inquirlee T0: I
City of Denton, Accounts Payshis John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent
215 E, McKinney St., Denton, TX 16201 Tom D, Shaw, C,P.M. Asst, Purchasing Agent
Phone 81715888223 81115688311 D1FW Metro 2874042
The City of Denson Is an equal opportunity employer J
11
Hill
i
i
i
1 -1 IA
-1 I-T
f 1
i I
~I ~
C
{4~
I
,5-02
February 21, 1989
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR/M1;MBLRS OF THE CI1Y COUNCIL
FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
SUBJ: CONSIDER DECORATIVE L1GHr1N'G RATE ON THE PERIMETLR OF THE
SQUARE,
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities board, at their meeting of January 25,
1989, recommended to City Council approval of the Decorative
Lighting Rate, attached as Exhibit 1, to become effective March
- 1, 1989.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
As part of a community service cacti year, the Electric II
Department provides the labor for the installation of the tree 1
lighting, wreaths, etc., for the Christmas decorations on the
Square. This year, the Downtown Merchants Association and the 1
j City of Denton decided to renovate the perimeter lighting system
due to its age and to make it more attractive so the lamps would
be uniform and riot have any sag due to the lack of supports.
i
The merchants agreed to provide all new bulbs, and the Electric
Department provided the labor. The merchants also expressed an
interest in leaving the lights on for 12 months, rather than
li just between Thanksgiving and New Year's day. The 22 merchants
and businesses around the square generally agreed to paying a
1 uniform fee to pay for the materials to upgrade the system and
for the extra 11 months of electricity to keep the lights on all i
year. The City has provided the electricity for the one month
of December In years past, but the proposed rate proposes that
the merchants pay for the lighting for the full 12 months.
The annual amortized cost of the materials for this project plus
an estimated $240 per year maintenance results in an annual cost
of $907.22 per year. Considering a possible 8-911 vacancy rate
F of businesses on the square wherein the City may not receive a
payment from the vacant business, a monthly facility charge of
$3,70/month per merchant was calculated. Applying the 2r`/KWl
fuel adjustment charge to the monthly energy use of 9790 KWH
and dividing by 22 and again allowing a 8-9% vacancy rate
1 results in an energy charge of $8.30/month. Therefore, the
total charge would be $12.00/month for each of the 22 merchants.
The rate is titled "Decorative Lighting Rate" and is attached as
Exhibit 1. The methodology for calculating the rate is also
attached, Exhibit II.
i
~ I 1
i
i
ILI
s
~ s
City Council Meeting
Page 2
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Utilities Department, Public Utilities Board, Merchants on the
Courthouse Square, Legal Department, Customer Service
Department, and City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Anticipated monthly revenue is $364.00.
r
L ly mit ,
ec?-
y [Jarrell, C y
Manager
F ( Prepared/ app oved by,
1c~ e- o#'/7
i ! k h. Nelson, xecut ve Director
Department of Utilities
~ I I
Exhibit I Decorative Lighting Rate Ordinance
II Methodology for Breakdown of Costs
III PUB Minutes of January 25, 1989
I
h i
I~t
M _
i
6319U:1-2
i
f
I
i
I
i'
r
e
BREAKUP OF COSTS FOR DECORATIVE LIGHTING RATES EXHIBIT II
1. FIXED EXPENSES TOTAL COSTS PER
YEAR
A. ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 0252
Materials:
7000' 112 THHN 0 $15.75/hr $280.00
1300 Sockets B $1.10/each 1,430.00
300 Fender washers/nuts W 5.07/each 21.00
1300 Sockets L Brackets 8 $.39/each 507.00
4 CS Hybraflex A 6 $210.00/CS 810.00
1 CS Epoxy 0 $205.00/CS 205.00
1838 Lamps 0 $1.23/each 2,260.74
_---$5,543.74 {
B. METERING AND SUBSTATION --0253
Materials:
3 Meter loops, 12 Relay contractors and 1,967,76
14 remote control devices
$7,511,60
Annual Debt Service Based on 30 years ® 8% $667.22
C. MAINTENANCE - $20/Month
$240.00
TOTAL FIXED EXPENSES (Materials, Equipment, Maintenance) $907.22
11 Expenses per Month
907.22 x 1.08 = 980 / 12 $81.67
2) FROility charge per month per customer c $3.71
(for 22 customers) (81.67/22)
II.ENEROY EXPENSE
Expenses per Month
1,838 Bulbs x 30 watts/bulb x 5 hrs/day = 100,631 kwh;yr
100,631 kwh/yr x .02 c/kwh c $2,012.63/yr
-1 $2,012,63/yr x 1.09 = $2,193.76
j $2,193.76/22 = $99.72/yr /12 = $°.30/month
Energy charge (Q 2 c/kwh ECA) = $8.30/Month
Energy Cost Adjustment to be applied to 415 kwh/mo per merchant
III.TOTAL FACILITY CHARGE k ENERGY CHARGE
4
Faoility - $3.70/Month
Energy - $8.30/Month
TOTAL = $12.00/Month
E
I
1 1
f
b
s
s
I
I
h
NO.~
f '
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UFUTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE SCHEDULE
OF RATES FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICES BY ADDING A NEW SCHEDULE DL
(DECORATIVE LIGHTING); AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
h THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
f`I SECTION I That the Schedule of Rates for electrical services
is 'amended by adding a new Schedule DL (Decorative Lighting),
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,
SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached
to the current Schedule of Rates for electrical services to show
the amendment herein approved.
SECTION III. That this ordinanco shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1989.
i
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
ATTEST;
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i
BY:_
1
I
I
r
l
SCHEDULE DL
DECORATIVE LIGHTING
APPLICATION '
Applicable to any customer on the perimeter of the square
served by the City's electric distribution system for outdoor
area lighting when such lighting facilities are operated as an
extension of the City's distribution system.
NET MONTHLY RATE
(1) Facility Charge a $3.10
(2) Energy Coat Adjustment
Current ECA x monthly bulb wattage factor based on 415
KVH par customer.
I
TYPE OF SERVICE
The City shall furnish, install, maintain and deliver
electric service to automatically controlled lighting fixtures
conforring to the City's standards and subject to its published
rulea and regulations. The service is provided between du3r
and midnight.
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES +
All service which requires special facilities in order to
meet the eustomwr's service requirements shall be provided
subject to special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILL
Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
r 3
Formula:
Actual days in reading period x facility Charge
ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT
A chart* per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
accordance with Schedule ECA.
r
k
i
j
s:
SCHEDULE DL
DECORATIVE LIGHTING
APPLICATION
Applicable to any customer on the perimeter of the square
served by the City's electric distribution system for outdoor
area lighting when such lighting facilities are operated as an
extension of the City's distribution system.
NET MONTHLY RATE
- (1) Facility Charge - $3.70
(2) Energy Cost Adlustment
Current ECA x monthly bulb wattage factc,r based on 415
KWH per customer.
TYPE OF SERVICE
The City shall furnish, install, maintain and deliver
electric service to automatically controlled lighting fixtures
conforming to the City's standards and subject to its published
rules and regulations. The service is provided between 6:00 PM.
and midnight.
PAYMENT
Bills are due when rendered, and become Bast due if not paid
within 15 calendar days from date of issuance.
SPECIAL FACILITIES ,
All service which requires special facilities in order to
meet the customer's service requirements shall be provided
subject to special facilities rider.
PRORATION OF UTILITY BILL
Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings
annually.
P Formula:
j Actual days in reading period x Facility Charge
J
ENERGY COST ADJUS7144ENNT-
A charge per KUH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in
accordance with Schedule ECA.
i
1
e
4
fA
4
i
y
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UIILI'FIES BO,%RD MINUTES
January 25, 1939
11. CONSIDER DECORATIVE LIGHTING RATE ON THE
PERIMETER OF THE SQUARE.
The Board asked if this rate will eventually be
available to others in outlying areas. Nelson
said no, this is strictly for the downtown area.
This rate is specifically related to materials and
costs associated with the installation of the
white decorative perimeter lights installed by the
downtown merchants and the city utility
department. The lights were originally intended
for holiday use only, but the downtown businesses
wanted to leave them on all year. The total cost
_ of keeping the lights on all year is proposed to
be shared by the 22 downtown merchants and will
represent an additional charge to their bill of
$14.40 per month. Thompson asked Mr. Cott,
representing the businessmen from the Chamber,
what the thoughts of the other area business
people were. Cott advised that the Chamber feels
this is probably the best thing to do. There was
discussion about the rate and what items were
included in the rate development process.
During further discussion, the Board felt that the
expenses associated with vehicle use charge for
installing the lights should not be included in
the charge, which would then reduce the charge to
approximately $12.00/month per each of the 22
merchants.
Chew made a motion to recommend to the City
Council approval of the "Decorative Lighting Rate"
($12.00/month) to be effective March 1, 1989, for
the downtown merchants. Second by Frady. All
ayes, no nays. Motion carried.
i
I'
I
1
I
I
i
rA
s
' I
.1
i
i
,
I 1
i
s
s ~
i
,
s
S
k :
A
DATE: February 7, 1989
CITY CO MIL REPORT FORMAT n
TO: Mayor and Meters of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SURTECT: Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Establish
cial Sanitation Collection Services. Rates for Ccmm r-
RFX7C1+k2JiIATICN:
The staff recommends approval of the ordinance which establishes Commercial
Sanitation Rates at a level sufficient to remver disposal cost.
SLMARY:
The proposed rate increases for dmT)ster customers avmrages approximately 9%
and the rate increase for roll-off customers is 16.68.
F1AC"-:(GfdOL$~D:
This is U-1 second step of the twee-step progr.ari of Oomnercial rate increases
discussed with the City Council last year which is designed to enable the
Solid Waste Division to reccn-er the additional cost of di
by the reduced life expectancy of the Landfill. sposal brought about
PROGRAFLS, DEPAKIPg YM OR GR"S AFFECTED:
f I All City of Denton Comrk-rcial solid waste Customers. Letters regarding the
i rate adjustment have been sent to all our Canmercial Solid Waste Custcuers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
l
At current service levels, the rate increase will generate approximately
$90,000 per year frcm roll-off and
approximately year. As of September 30, 1988, $119,000 reerved 0for future sters per
of the Landfill debt. This hatches our estimates from a sposition
year ago.
Respect lly submitted,
twZ e /A
Llo Harrel
City m anager
~ Pre red
I 9 ~ -
~ ~ es S. Wa s
f Superintendent, Solid Waste Division
Approved try:
Aqe
Director of C&munity Services
I
3cw02078917/1
I
E
J
r
L
i
2234L
NO. _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON AMENDING THE RATES FOR
COMMERCIAL SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CHAPTER 12 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the charges for commercial and institutional
i garbage collection services, established in accordance with
section 12-20 of article III of chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances, are hereby amended as follows:
A. DLH PSTERS ,
Cubic Yards Rate
Collected Per Week Per 30 Days
i
' 1-3 8.23
4-6 6 34
7-10 6.09
11-25 5.96 1
26-50 5.91
51-100
5.74 ~
101-125 5.49
126-150 5.40
151-175 15.14
176-Up 4.97
B. OPEN TOP CONTAINERS AND COMPACTORS
Type of Rent
Container Per Month Service Charge
20 cubic yard open top 39.53 4.74 per cubic yard
30 cubic yard open top 52.50 4.74 per cubic yard
40 cubic yard open top 57.75 4.74 per cubic yard
12 cubic yard compactor 87.15 4.74 per cubic yard
a 15 cubic yard compactor 89.25 4.74 per cubic yard
20 cubic yard compactor 115.50 4.74 per cubic yard
25 cubic yard compactor 115.50 4.74 per cubic yard
30 cubic yard compactor 157.50 474 per cubic yard 1
42 cubic yard compactor 1176.40 14:74 per cubic yard
1
1
a
i
t°
A delivery fee of $50.00 per container will be charged to cll
new customers for open top containers and compactors.
SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective
HarcF- , - 9FT
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989.
P E , MAYOR
I
ATTEST:
i
r
E . IFE ER S, ITY 9ECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DR.AYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i I I
BY:
f ` - rn a_
F ~
i
i ~
i
I
I
i
Jim ILA
- - - - - - - - - - - -
r
DATE: 02/21/89
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO., Mayor and Members of the City Council ,
FROM. uloyd V. Harrell, City Manage[
SUVECT: AN ORDINANCE ESTABL►.':IING FEES FOR SIGN PERMITS, LICENSING, AND
REGISTRATION OF PORTABLE SIGNS.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the fee schedule.
SUMMARY:
The proposed fees are based on average costs to issue a permit,
license or registration permit. The cost includes staff time and
materials.
' BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved a revised sign ordinance on February 7,
1989 which will go into effect on February 22, 1989. The prior fee
schedule is attached for comparison.
i
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
V .
Sign owners, individuals using signs, and sign companies.
i
i
FISCAL IMPACT:
} The fees are estimated to cover the cost of issuing a permit.
R ctf?u /F 8 ot4ttod:
J~`(~/!!
Prepared by: L yd V. Harrell
City Manage[
Cecile Carson
Urban ?fanner
Av
obbins, AICP
Executive Director for
Planning and Development
31I7g
f
r
r
i
t
r
i
I
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING FEES FOR
SIGN PERMITS, LICENSES, AND THE REGISTRATION OF NONCONFORMING
PORTABLE SIGNS, AS PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 17 OF APPENDIX B-20NING
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the permit fees for signs provided for in
article 17 of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances shall be
as follows:
I Effective Area (square feet) Egg
0-60 $20.00
over 60 to 120 25.00
over 120 to 250 55.00
SECTION II. That the fee for a license for persons erecting
signs for compensation as required by article 17 of Appendix B-
Zoning of the Code of Ordinances shall be $10.00.
SECTION III, That the fee for registering a nonconforming
portable sign as required by article 17 of Appendix B-Zoning of
the Code of Ordinances shall be $2.50 per sign.
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective on
February 21, 1989.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
I~
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR ,
ATTESTS
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
1
BY: /YNA J+rr'"
I
1
I
I
I
FEES
I
i
Ordinance 85-205 Proposed
Permit: Permitt
Square feet Fee Square feet Fee
0 to 50 915.00 0 to 60 320.00
Over 50 to 100 920.00 Over 60 to 120 925.00
1 Over 100 to 200 425.00 Over 120 to 250 955.00
Over 200 to 300 $30.00
j Over 300 to 400 350.00
Over 400 975.00
Liceasing: N/A Licensing: 910.00
I
Registration: No fee Registration: 32.50
1
I
I
I I
I
f r~
I '
31278
i
1
i
i
moil
11111 NIB I I j-,
- -
i
I
i
i
1
444 1]
r
I
6-P
2644L
NO.
ORDERING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE
AN ORDINANCE CALLING AND b~ 1989, AND, IN THE EVENT A RUNOFF
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, 1989 FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTING
ELECTION IS REQUIRED, ON MAY 20,
COUNCILMFrSB£RS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
TO PLACES 1, 2, 3 AND 4; ORDERING THAT THE PUNCH CARD ELECTRONIC
FICIALS;
APPOINTINGSEELECT ON DOFELECTION;
AND COUNTY
PLACES DFNTON
VTING
D IN DESIGNATING ~iVOTADOPTED
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECT PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF SAID
PROVIDIN FOP, ELECTIUA SUPPLIES,
I THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section I. Pursuant to the terms and provisions of Texas, a municipal
3.01 o the barter of the City of Denton, ' of Denton, le City election is hereby ordered to1989 held
for thetpurpose of electing
Texas on the 6th day of May,
Councilmembers for Places 1, 1, 3 and 4;
In the event a runoff is required, such election shall be
the 20th day of May, 1989.
held on Saturday, 6, 198q,
SECTION 11. polls for said election on May May 20,
and n t e event runoff election is required, and the
1989, shall be ,en from 1100 A .M. oshal00be as•1follows:
election voting places or polling places
1. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 1 shall vote at:
MARTIN LuTHFI'300 NWIL50N SSE ~TION CENTER
DENTON, TEXAS
2. All qualified voters o residing in Siuglc Member District
at:
No. 2 shall
FIRE STATION NO. 4
2110 SHERMAN DRIVE
DENTON9 TEXAS
I
I
3. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 3 shall vote at:
NORTH LAKES RECREATION CENTER
2001 WEST WINDSOR DRIVE
DENTON, TEXAS
4. All qualified voters residing in Single Member District
No. 4 shall vote at:
DENIA PARK RECREATION CENTER
1001 PARVIN
DENTON, TEXAS
SECTION III. The election officials for said election on
May T,--n-8§, and for May 20, 1989, should a runoff be required,
shall be as follows:
1. (a) R. B. Escue shall be the Presiding Judge and Barbara
Fisher shall be the Alternate Judge at the Central
Counting Station.
(b) Joann Garbacik shall be the Manager of the Central
Co•nting Station.
i
(c) Randie Smith shall be the Tabulation Supervisor at
the Central Counting Station.
2. Catherine Bell shall be the Presiding Judge and Lula
Boyd shall be the Alternate Judge at the American
Legion Hall in Single Member District No. 1.
3. Doris Chipman shall be the Presiding Judge and Johnnie
Allen shall be the Alternate Judge at the Fire Station
No. 4 in Single Member District No. 2.
4. R. L. Speer shall be the Presiding Judge and Dorothy
Alderdice shall be the Alternate Judge at the North
Lakes Recreation Center in Single Member District No. 3.
5. Barbara Fisher shall be the Presiding Judge and John
Trent shall be the Alternate Judge at Denta Park
Recreation Center in Single Member District No. 4.
I
Page 2
J
r
b. Jennifer Walters, City Secretary, shall conduct absentee
voting under the Texas Election Code.
7. R. B. Escue, Presiding Judge, Absentee Ballot Board.
Thy respective Presiding Judge of each voting Place and
the Central Counting Station shall be authorized to appoint a
sufficient number of Clerks as they may deem necessary to
assist them in said election, including bilingual assistants
as required by law.
SECTION IV. Absentee voting shall be conducted for the
elect o~ n to 5_e held on May b, 1989 and, in the event of a run-
off for the election, May 20, 1989, by the Office of the City
Secretary in the Municipal Building on East McKinney Street in
the City of Denton, Texas, and the polls for absentee voting
shall be open for voting in person between the hour of 8:00
A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday during the times
allowed for absentee voting, commencing April 17, 1989 and
ending May 2, 1989.
SECTION V. That the Mayor is hereby directed to provide
notice of said election, and runoff election if necessary, in
accordance with Sections 4.002 (2) and 4.003 (b), Texas
Election Code, said notice to be printed in the Spanish
language and the English lanL;uape, said posting to be not less
than twenty-one (21) days prior to said election and said
publication to be made not earlier than the 30th day before
the election and not later than the 10th day before the
election.
SECTION VI. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to
prepare the official ballot for said election and perform each
and every act required by the Charter and laws of the State of
Texas for holding elections.
SECTION VII. The rate of pay for election judges and
cler ss a-ME-ee the maximum amount provided for by State lnw.
SECTION VIII. That an electronic voting system, meeting
j the requirements of Chapter 124 of the Texas Election Code
l shall he used for said election.
SECTION IX. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate ery upon its passage and approval.
I
Page 3
I
I
V
i
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 21st day of February, 1989.
1
i
RAY STE?HEN9-,-RWYUR---
ATTEST:
J ENPi~R WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
1 ~
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORI-t
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
O . I Y Wy'1
I
I
I
I
I
k Page 4 1
1
i
f
#11111 'IIH 11-H11 1 14441 ''J''
mill 1, 1401100"011
IJEII=
LJEII=
~I
I I
I
i
LJEI=
{I
i
I
•
L.Lu
q+R 1111 4- 11111,11111-M
fill
~T
~II
r 4
}
1
COMMISSION STATE. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENGINEER DIRECTOR
ROBERT H. DIED MAN, CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTA770N R. E. STOTZE R, JR.
JOHN R. BUTLER, JR. P.O. Box 3067
1
RAY STOKER, JR, Dallas, Texas 75221-3067
February 7, 1989
Surplus Property 1
IN REPLY REFER TO
Denton County
Control 2054-2
I F.M. 2181: Old curve at Lillian Miller Parkway in the City of Denton
Mr. Lloyd Y. Harrell
City Manager
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr. Harrell:
At the request of your City Engineer, Mr, Jerry Clark, we are preparing a
submission to our Austin Administration recommending quitclaiming to the City
of Denton the above referenced tract at no charge. 1
I ~
To supplement our recommendation, please provide a resolution from your City
Council including 1) the attached field note description, 2) a statement that
an independent determination has been made that the land is no ionger needed
for use by citizens as a road, and 3) requesting that the State release the
land to the City of Denton, as an exception to policy, at no cost, I
Your forwardilg a copy of this resolution to us will be appreciated and will
implement further processing. Please contact Mary Harris, (214) 320-6252 if
there are questions.
Sincerely,
S. T. Worthington k-9iEn;er
j Oistrlct Right of MOH
Attachment
cc: Mr. Jerry Clark i
D
i
FEB - 91969 i
CITY MANAGERS 0 'T
9 1CE
4
r
e
s
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, DECLARING THAT THE LAND
HEREIN DESCRIBED IS NO LONGER NEEDED BY THE PUBLIC FOR ROAD
PURPOSES AND REQUESTING THAT THE STATE OF TEXAS RELEASE THE LAND
TO THE CITY OF DENTON AT NO COST; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State of Texas owns and maintains certair land
within the City of Denton as a public road, designated a& F.M.
2181; and
,--1 WHEREAS, the City of Denton has made an independent
determination that a portion of that road, boing a curved segment
located adjacent to the intersection of Lillian Miller Parkway and
Teasley Lane (F.M. 2181), as more particularly described herein,
i is no longer needed by the public for road purposes; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I. That the City of Denton, Texas, requests that the
State of Texas release the land described in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and incorporated by reference, to the City of Denton, Texas,
at no cost to the City.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
i
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
p APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
f DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: Q • ~YV1 ~..Y..
t
I
fi
a
i
r,
FIELD NOTES
1.236 ACRES
Being all that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated
in the C. Poullalier Survey, Abstract Number 1006, and being
out of and a part of those tracts of land conveyed to the State
of Taxes by deeds recorded in Volume 400, Page 341 and Volume
400, Page 334, Deed Records, Denton County, in the City and
County of Denton, Texas, and being more particularly described
as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron rod found for corner in the south line of
M Teasley Lane, a public roadway having a right-of-way of 90.0
feet, and in the northeast line of Farm-to-Market Road Number
"J1 2181, a public roadway having a right-of-way of 90,0 feet, the
existing southwest corner of the intersection of said Teasley
Lane and Lillian Miller Parkway, a public roadway having an
existing right-of-way of 80.0 feet, bears south 890 44' 37"
east, 297.18 feet;
THENCE along the arc of a curve to the right, having a central
angle of 310 131 S61', a radius of 761.20 feet, an arc length
of 414.93 feet, whose chord bears south 4S0 32' 37" east to it
point for corner in the proposed west line of said Lillian
Miller Parkway, the proposed right-of-way of said parkway being
90.0 feet;
1 THENCE south 010 04' 17" east, 289.64 feet with said proposed
west line of said parkway to a point for corner in the
southwest line of said F.M. road;
THENCE along the arc of a curve to the left, having a central
angle of 760 48' 31", a radius of 671.20 feet, an arc length
of 899,79 !eet whose chord bears north 460 07' 30" west,
833,91 feet with said southwest line of said F.M. road, to a
point for corner in said south line of said Teasley Lane;
THENCE South 890 44' 37" east, 303.19 feet with said south
line of said Teasley Lane to the !LACE OF BEGINNING and
containing 1.236 acres of land.
OS35E/SS
k
I
r
$1 11 F44;P
j 1444144
I
h
h
I
1 i
i
I
II
I _
I
4
-1 -1 1
€ s
r
i
1 ,
I }
i
CITY of DFNTONtTEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (817) 588.8307
Office of (he City Manager
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 16, 1989
} Tot Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
From: Roger Nelson, Administrative Assistant
Subject: BELL AVENUE STREET CLOSING
4 The Denton Festivbi Foundation has requested that the City
Council temporarily close Bell Avenue between East Prairie and
East Hickory on Saturday. April 22, from 8 A.M. to 8 P.M., and
on Sunday, April 23, from 10 A.M. to 7 P.M. The event that is
` j scheduled for this time is the 1989 Spring Fling.
It is staff's understanding that no booths or activities are
v planned for Bell Avenue proper, and that this request is being
made out of a concern for the safety of those people attending
Spring Fling. The children's activities are planned for the
park owned by the Denton Record Chronicle on the west side of
Bell Avenue, with additional events planned for the property
owned by the Greater Denton Arts Council on both the east and
wept sides of Bell. It was the opinion of the organizers of
the event that it Bell were to remain open, the safety of those
people attending Spring Fling would be in jeopardy.
The emergency services aspect of the street closing have been
evaluated by both Chief Cook and Chief Jez, Both chiefs have
determined that the street closing poses no real threat to
their. ability to deliver emergency services through out the
city.
Staff is suggesting one change to the proposed street closing.
j to order for the rerouted traffic to move as smoothly as
possible, staff is suggesting that the southern boundary of the
closed area be changed to the intersection of Bell and
industrial rather than Bell and Prairie. North bound traffic
on Bell will simply continue on up Industrial, making a right
turn on to Sycamore, followed by a left turn back on to Bell.
February 16. 1989
Page Two
South bound traffic will follow the same route. This change
will allow for a better flow of traffic through the area and it
will minimize any inconveniences caused by ::he street closing.
This change has been discussed with Mc. Angelo, and he is in
agreement with staffs position on this matter.
Boll Avenue is one of the truck routes in Denton, Industrial is
not. The City will place temporary truck route signs along
Bell, Prairie, Elm, [,ocust, and McKinney. These signs will be
put in place and taken down by the same crews that will be
responsible for the barricades.
t The Denton Festival Foundation will be making a contribution to
the City to reimburse the Police Department for any costs
incurred in providing traffic control. There will also be two
off duty Police officers as well as four Police reservists
providing on site security through out the Spring Fling
activities.
Please let me know if any further information is needed on this
matter.
Rog e? Nelson
Attachments
4446M
I [
4
February 16, 1989
Mr. Roger Nelson
Administrative Assiatant
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Roger:
As You knO', the Denton Festival Foundation has opted to relocate the Denton
Spring Fling to the area in and around the Center for the Visual Arts. It will
be necessary to utilize property on both sides of Bell Avenue controlled by the
Greater Denton Arts Council and the property owned by the Denton Record Chroni-
cle on the west side of Bell in order to accommodate the various events and
activities planned for Spring Fling.
We are extru-noly concerned relative to the cleat anount of pedestrian traffic
which will be crossing Bell Avenue during the event and are, therefore, re-
questing that the City consider closing Bell Avenue from Hickory to Prairie
during the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on Saturday, April 22, 1989, argil
from 10:00 A.M. to 7100 P.M. on Sunday, April 23, 1989.
As indicated in the attached pytition, we have secured the support of all thy.
businesses which may be affected by this closure. Additionally, the attached
memorandums from the Chief of F'olioe a:ud the Fire Department support this
closure. I have also discussed this closure with the Transportation Engines+r-
I ing Division and with the Street Department and they have expressed no conoern
with such action.
Since the City of Denton is one of the original founders of Spring Fling and a
very active co-sponsor of the event, we will insure that this closure is
adequately handled. That is, Streets will provide for proper barricading and
Streets, Solid Waste and Parke will provide any necessary cleanup.
Should you have any questions or caaments on this matter, please let us know.
Sincerely,
BBillAn
BANG
2002148908
Attachments
I
J
11,
f; WL1 ,
r~2; ~S1' a
Denton Police Department
221 N. ELM
DENTON, TEXAS 76201
To: Bill Angelo, Director of Public Works
From: Michael W. Jez, Chief of Police
I ,
RC: Street Closing
Date: January 30, 1989
Bill,
Per our telephone conversation, the Department has no objections to the
closing of Bell Street between Prairie and Hickory for the Spring Fling
Festival.
Although Bell. Is a major artery, I foresee no problems, provided it is
adequately barricaded and police officers are appropriately placed to
assist in vehicular traffic.
4 Chie of olic
City of Denton i I I l~) f
l~V U L
JAN 3 119
I
` I`r ~ 1 rr r
» oa it,+$ C11 N
(817) 568.6181 METRO 434.7.520
1
1
iM 10
TO; ROGER NELSON CHO
FROM: JIM DOTSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
SUBjECTI CLOSING OF BELL AVE FOR SPRING FLING J
IMTEI FEBURARY 16, 1909 1
WE UNDERSTAND THERE IS A REOUEST TO CLOSE BELL AVE FROM HICKORY ST TO PRAIRIE.
THERE ARF A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU CONSIDER.
I. THE SECTION OF BELL AVE IN QUESTION IS A TF:UCK' ROUTE. THERE ARE SEVERAL TRUCK
RELATED BUSINESSES IN THE AREA THAT COULD BE EFFECTED,
2. THAT YOU CONSIDER BLOCKING BELL AT If,i'USTRIAL ON THE SOUTH END hNll REROUTE
k THE TRAFFIC DOWN INDUSTRIAL. THIS UOULD NOT IMPACT THE TRAFFIC AS MUCH AS
GOING TO LOCUST OR ELM.
3. THAT BARRICADES BE F'LACrII AT ALL INTERSECTIONS.
v
4. WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH ON DUTY POLICE OFFICERS TO STATION ONE AT ALL I4TERSECTIONSY
THEREFORE WE WOULD NEED TO HAVE AT LEAST 4 OFF DUTY OFFICERS FOR TRAFFIC CONTPIL.
5. THERE SHOULD BE SOME THOUGHT TO THE LARGE CROWD AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR VEHICLE
TRAFFIC IN THE AREA AND HAVE ADDITIONAL POLICE OFFICERS AND RESERVE POLICE
OFFICERS TO HANDLE THE CROWD CONTROL.
Y1
JIM
E
~f rFM 810
r; s ior~PV__,
4
a
9
? 1
1 F\
1
MEMO 089-007
TO: MR. B. ANGELO, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES J
FROM: J. L. COOK, JR., FIRE CHIEF 1J
DA'E: 24 JANUARY, 1989
RE: SPRING FLING
THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT HAVE ANY FR0BLEM WITH YOUR
REQUEST TO CLOSE BILL AVENUE 3ETWE£N HICKORY AND PRAIRIE ON
22 AND 23 APRIL, 1989 FOR THE ANNUAL SPRING FLING. WE
UNDERSTAND THAT THE STREET WILL ONLY BE CLOSED DURING THE
EVENTS AND NOT FOR THE ENTIRE 48 HOUR PERIOD. 1
I
SHOULD YOU NEED ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, DO NOT HESITATE
TO CONTACT ME.
JLC/BF
iJAN 2 5 )989
8ervke center
I
h
i
i
REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE
Jrganization requesting street closure J,
Contar.t Persona f~ /~n~.1o ~,r a~e"
Address
t_~/5 ~rl~« , /o % 7610
Phone Number:_ Stitt' fj~Q of f7 F Street To Be Closedt ✓e. 0 Fr~ to '/rc ~r
Intersecting Streetsii;ie16A.'„e ,
+,lyve..3e~ rC T r
_sad /~i'Aot
Reason For Closure i_ 198R.Snrlnc j /V
adn5 for ClesLrf - Anril ~.7b7; /4~~_/ORr~~ 22+1QR9--1awt~e.p~p9Q~
Rpr+'J231.1984-10;GOaM 10 ~Li7 .rat ,
Please complete t 1
he bottom portion of this forts. ALL r
and/or businesses affected by the street closure MUST be
contacted and sign below with an indication of being S -favor
or In opposition to the street closure.
I '
NAME AUTHORIZED
J ~OF,f- SINESS SIGNATURE FAVOR OPPOSE
#JA 4 '
1 ~5.(aSLG,f.YG3Lt' ol ane„ ~~f1s ~en"n)-~
L. /
~r
`-~a l>) e,i A4 r
7.~ •~c. ~~bf-f-wq.s-lwJ C~'l~~ ` / /K [f..C e. "4~✓ Kf.l/HK~c~f
9 f ,
12. t !
298ac/s
S
tl
REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSUR%
Organization requesting street closure
Contact Ferson:,/ iS' ,f'
Address:
Phone Number: Oz~ /xzz-oe
Street To Be Closed://, jl'a
Date and Time To Be Closed: - -
intersecting Streets:
-Ea'/~A•~l~f✓~.~.ao.PS.
Reason For Closure:
Please complete the bottom portion of this form, residents
and/or businesses affected by the street closure M118T be
contacted and sign below with an indication of being in favor
or in opposition to the street closure.
NAME AUTHORIZED
FF U'JS N OF V PO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
S.
9.
- 10.
2983C/5
{
2642L
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING BELL AVENUE ON APRIL 22-23, 1989; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Denton Festival Foundation has requested that Bell
Avenue, from its intersection with Fast Prairie Street to its inter-
section with East Hickory Street, a public street within the corporate
limits of the City of Denton, Texas be temporarily closed to public
vehicular traffic on April 22, 1989 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m. and on April 23, 1989 between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m., for the purpose of having the 1989 Spring Fling; and
WHEREAS, the Denton Festival Foundation has assured the City
Council that all residents in such block have agreed to the temporary
closing of Bell Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
i SECTION I. That Bell Avenue, from its intersection with East
Prairie SIreeC to its intersection with East Hickory Street, a public
street in the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas, be
temporarily closed to vehicular traffic from the hours of 8:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m. on April 22, 1988 and 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on April 23,
1989, for the purpose of having the Spring Fling with the following
conditions:
1. The Denton Festival Foundation will clean up after the
Spring Fling.
I SECTION II. That the City Manager shall direct the appropriate
City p1Tpartment to work with the Denton Festival Foundation to erect
barricades on Bell Avenue, from its intersection with East Prairie
Street to its intersection with East Hickory Street, at 8:00 a.m. on
April 22, 1988 and to have the same removed at 8:00 p.m. and 10:00
a.m, on April 23, 1989 and to have the same removed at 7:00 p.m. on
said date.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of r , 1989.
P '
9 ATTEST:
I j
JENNIFER W TER , CITY TE-C-R-EURRY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY.,
I
t w 197
2.
~1 C25 19-
ION RE
n- z o 81~ ~
y 2316
X701
FtL uLMO
2411 +ro~r
33 + ' - -KII
23 a
►AK
4? w ~
~~ICKOR
38 ~T
o 22 19 OEYLOA s
2582 o r
oow Yo1MN T
J ST i
% 6 8 J
cr. PRAIR
II oN N OHL ! a
4 2
i
I
3 j
MILL
A
n
I
i
li
1
I
I ~
1
J
I
I
1
1 1I`
I
j
I
i
J.
G
f 1411 R S i c3OMMtlIlea CODIIJANY
INVE 'i AI EXT IIANKE1?4
700 FIRST CITY CENTER
1700 PACIFIC AVENUE
DA:: LA S, T E XA S 73201
1-
February 2, 1989 1 214 053 4000
Mr. Lloyd Harrell
City Manager
City of Denton F .3 IM
r 215 E. McKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201 OF
-
CI_I MANaG1:i~5 r~r
` Dear Lloyd;
As you may be aware, the Denton County Housing Finance Corporation plans
to have a single-family housing bond Issue In 1989. The Corporation has been advised
they have received a state allocation that will permit an Is;ue of approximately
$16,000,000. There has been demonstrated a high interest in the program by lenders 1
and builders in the Denton County and the allocation has been oversubscribed,
The program Is designed to assist potential homeowners In the lower income
brackets and is limited to first time homeowners. We expert the mortgage rate to be
In the 8.396 to 8.73% range which we feel would be very beneficial to the citizens of
your City.
f One of the requirements of the prograrn Is that cities with a population in
f excess of 20,000 must agree by council action to participate In the program. In this
regard, we are enclosing resolutions for your Council's action if you wish t-
participate. Since we must close the bond sale within 60 days of the aIlocatlc.,T
(February 1) we request that consideration be given the resolution at the earliest
convenience of the Council.
I 1
J If you have any questions regarding the program or the resolution, please call
me. If the Council does approve the resolution, please return the executed
documents to me as soon as possible.
Ver ruly yo rs,
I
Frank J. Medanl- c~h
j FJMlcrn
Enclosure
i
i
2638L
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL TO THE DENTON COUNTY HOUSING
FINANCE CORPORATION FOR THE USE OF ITS SERIES 1989 SINGLE
FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS FOR ACQUIRING HOME MORTGAGES
RELATED TO HOMES WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the creation of the Denton County Housing Finance
Corporation (the "Corporation"), pursuant to the Texas Housing
Finance Corporations Act (Oie "Act"), was approved b resolu-
tion of the governing body of Denton County (the 'County"),
adopted on the 14th day of January, 1980, to provide a means
of financing the cost of residential ownership and development
that will provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing for
residents of the County at prices- they can afford; and
WHEREAS, the Corporation has the power under the Act to
issue its bonds, the aggregate principal amount of which in
any calendar yeac may not exceed certain limitations set forth
in Section 394.051 of the Act and the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended; and
i
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has
requested the approval of the governing body of the City of
Denton, Texas ('the City") to acquire home mortgages related
to homes within the City with the proceeds of Corporation's
Series 1989 Single Famil; Mortgage Revenue Bond issue (the
"Bonds"); NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF TaE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City hereby
grants approve for the Corporation to utilize proceeds of the
Bonds for acquiring home mortgages related to homes within the
City.
f SECTION II. That the City Council indicates its desire to
1 part c pate in this program by forwarding a copy of this
resolution to the Denton County Planning Department.
SECTION III. That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
i
i
77
. , r!
i
i I
i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
Y TEP E , MAYOR
I ` ATTEST:
t i
` t JENNIFER WALTERS, C
i
i J
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
L DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i '
i
BY:
-YLA
1
l
PAGE 2
i
I
r
I Bill
1
I
I
I
I
E
I li
I
I 1
i
I
~ I
\AF1111 I
4.44 11 1
1
i tA
R
DATE: 2/21/89
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJ: Consideration of a motion to approve Community
Development Block Grant funding criteria.
RECOMMEND MN :
CDBG Committee recommended approval of original
document.
BACKGROUND:
The CDBG Committee developed criteria rind it was
submitted to Council at the February 7th Work
sjs.iun Council made one addition to the document
and voiced approval. The CDBG Committee Chairperson
stated that she felt the committee members would
! support Council's addition.
s
UHMARY: The following sentence was added to tho introduction:
I The primary goal of the City of Denton's Community
i Development Block Grant Program is to participate in
projects which provide visible improvements to low and
moderate income neighborhoods."
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Individuals and groups requesting grant funding
for projects.
1
FISCAL INPACT:
N/A - All allocated CDBG funds will be expended.
I
R ectfull ubmitt d:
oyd V. Harrel ,
ity Manager
I
Prepared by:
a6~~L I
Barbara Ross
Community Development Coordinator
9
~I
Approved:
Frank Rob ns AICP
Executive director for Planning 6 Development
e '
z ~
'a
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 1+
FUNDING REQUESTS V
All individuals/groups requesting Community Development Block Grant funds must
prepare the attached questionnaire and return it to the Community Development
Office, L10B West Oak, Denton, Texas, on or before March 10, 1989. If you
have questions or need assistance please call 566-8480.
The primary goal of the City of Denton's Community Development Block Grant
Program is to participate in projects which provide visible improvements to
low and moderate income neighborhoods. Program/project assessment is based on
the set of criteria below. It is not necessary for each project to meet all
,'-"'1 criteria. Please note also that the program and fiscal criteria are not rank
ore;red. The description is intended to assist those requesting funds to
understand the Community Development Block Grant committee's decision-making
process. Final recommendations to City Council will based upon an analysis of
proposals in relatlonmhip to satisfaction of criteria.
The attached questionnaire will be utilized by committee members to determine ,
which requests merit further discussion. These individuals/groups will then
be requested to appear before the CDBG committee to state their proposal and
answer any questions by committee members and staff,
I ~
Project Priority Ranking
I
1. Housing rehabilitation and other housing activities
2. Demolition and clearance activities
3. Public facilities and improvements
4. Public services (subject to 15t cap per year)
5. Economic development activities
Program Criteria
1. Meets one of three national objectives
a. Benefit to low/mot
b. Elimination of alum or blight
co Meets an urgent need
2, Approximate number of individuals/households benefiting
3, Service/project constitutes a direct benefit activity or provides a
substantial indirect benefit
4, Project feasibility
A. Location
+ b. Cost
co Need
d. Staff monitoring requirements
S. Service/project is unduplicated or will not be carried out in a timely
E manner without CDBG funding
Fiscal Criteria
1. Comparison of cost per household benefiting
2. Availability of other source funding for project
3. Probability of continued funding or sufficient funding to complete project
4. Increase of other source funding as a result of CDBG donation
2370)
r~
y
1 H4 11
I l~
I
I
i
i
I
I
r
111
I
i
` DATE: 2/21/89
f ScILL'_EQUN;:IL__REPORT FORMAT
70: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lls.yd V. Fiurroll, City Manager
SUBJ: Consideration of a motion to approve Human
Services Committee funding criteria.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of revisions to
HRC policies and procedures document.
BACKGROUND:
Council provided guidance to the Human Resources
Committee concerning funding criteria. A joint
meeting was held with Council where the HRC
` voiced concerns over limitations incorporated
f into the Policies and Procedures document.
Council directed Chairwoman Dorothy Damico and
Councilman Ayer to workout a compromise document.
Council on February 7th considered the document
and deleted references to specific program types
and targeted beneficiaries.
f I
SUMMARY: Changes requested by Council have been made to
Section VII.
i
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED;
` i Service agencies requesting assistance.
FIBCAL IMPACT:
I Criteria will affect general fund assistance
I' provided to agencies.
Resp u ly/suj'~ted
Lloy V. Harrell
City Manager
~ Prepl
red by:/ "
CAL/ ~Cd;~
Barbara Ross
Community Development Coordinator
Approved:
U W14
Frank Robbins AICP
i Executive Director for Planning 6 Development
i
I ~
r
I
HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
1.
Ststement or_ u ose of Committee: The Human Resources Committee acts as an
advisory committee to the City Council. Its members are appointed by the
Council. The purpose of this Committee is to interact with community groups
in order to bring about improvements In the human services delivery syste.n and
provide a forum which promotes better communication and coordination among the +
agencies, to work closely with the United Vay and other funding agencies in
order to coordinate funding efforts within the City, to serve in an advisory
capacity and encourage continuous in-depth evaluation of the effectiveness of
the human service delivery system in Denton; and to recommend to the City
--1 Council, actions for implementation that would improve human services in the
City of Denton.
it.
Human Services Deflneds The term human services refers to those services
{ provided by non-profit agencies to be available to targeted groups of
individuals throughout the community who are ezperienctug social problems. 1
Human rerviees are those services designed to address utucet human needs and to
j improvu the quality of life of the targeted population.
j III.
I Gen4Lal T_yDee of Requests to be Considered by the Committee; Human resource
egeneles, Individuals, or organizations currently operating In the City of
Denton, and/or new agencies proposing to conduct operations within the City
will probably request an appearance before the Committee for one or more of
the following reasons:
a. To coordinate their agency's program with other community agencies.
b. To disseminate information to the Committee.
a. To request unofficial recognition and support by the Committee.
d. To request a letter of support by the Committee and/or an official
letter or resolution by the City Council.
e. To request financial assistance from the City Council.
IV.
General Polletes and Procedures for Conside Hun a Reoueat by n 8uman Resource
Mency. Individual or Or ntza o The policies and procedures adopted by
the Human Resource Committee will apply to all individuals and agencies that
i have made a request to appear before the Committee.
I
II ,
i
~k
i
$ Human Resource Advisory Committee
Page 2
A. The Committee normally meets on the first Thursday of each month.
Agencies or individuals wishing to appear before the Committee shall
request to be included on the agenda at least seven (7) working days prior
to the Committee meeting. 1
B. Bach agency or Individual will complete and return to the staff prior to
the seven (7) working days, a questionnaire entitled "Questionnaire for a
Human Resource Agency." These will be made available through the City
Staff.
C. Presentations by representatives of a human service agency will make every
effort to limit their presentations to 20 minutes. The Committee reserves j
- the right to interrupt or halt a presentation which exceeds this period of
time.
D. The Committee reserves the right to limit the number of agency requests
per meeting.
3. Agencies or individuals making presentations before the Committee will be
responsible for all had out materials and audio/video equipment which they
may desire to use during this presentation.
1
{ F. All Human Resource Committee meetings are open to the public and news
media, however, the committee may request that representatives of agencies
wait outside while the Committee is discussing and deciding what
{ appropriate action to take in regard to that particular agency's request. I
I ~
V.
Subieot Matter to be Considered by the Comitttee: All agencies, individuals
or other types of organizations requesting to appear before the Human Resource
Committee will complete the Human Resources Agency questionnaire which will be 1
provided by the Staff. The questionnaire will be placed in a file and copies I
distributed to the Committee. The questionnaire is designed as a
comprehensive effort by the Committee to learn as much as possible about the
agency. Section I deals with general Information; Section It focuses on the
nature of the agency's request; Section III is used if any agency is
requesting funds; Section IV dwells on 0NB circular A-95 information; Section
V includes questions on organizational and general characteristics of the
agency; Section VI deals with the policy making body; Section VII is the
agency's financial report; and Section VIII concerns itself with the services
provided by the agency. The questionnaire was developed to allow for specific
1 changes during the year. The questionnaire would only be updated in the areas
9 that have experienced some type of change, deletion or addition and/or perhaps
expansion.
i
Agencies requesting on official letter of support by the Committee, Council
resolution or financial assistance from the City should be prepared to provide
the following information in addition to completing the questionnaire.
J
I
I
I
4
Human Resource Advisory Committee
Page 3
1. Proposed budgets by overall agency and by program.
2. An auditor's opinion statement as to the agency's financial position.
3. Goals and objectives of any new proposed program, project or service. J
4. Monitoring or evaluation statement by the funding agency or licensing
agency.
5. Annual report for thi latest fiscal, grant or calendar year.
year. closely
6. for new agencies or new operations after othe first will look
at the methods for continuing
7, Documentation as to the community's need.
8. A breakdown reflecting administrative costs as compared to the type and
amount of service cost per client.
9. Turn down letters by state or federal funding agencies.
10. A list of other sources from whom the agency may intend to solicit {
financial assistance.
I I
III
YI. J
Types of Actions or Recommendations to be Made by the Committee:
A. Where agencies are only desiring to disseminate information or coordinate j
their agency's efforts with the Committee, the Committee will probably
take no action.
approvalsupport
actcbyna motion andletter
9, from agencies are requesting the Committee unofficial
majority of the Committee.
C. Where agencies desire official support or recognition by the City Council
or requesting financial assistance, the Committee shall act by a motion
and approval by a majority of the Committee. The Committee will prepare a
formal recommendation which will be transmitted to the City Manager's
Office. The Committee's recommendation will follow one of the three
recommendations listed below:
i
1. eAvorabls Rem da JIG,. A favorable recommendation will mean
} thst the agency has eatlefied all the Committee's request for
information, has meet the Committee's standards to set forth in
the Comprehensive Human Resource plan and has documented the
community's need.
i
l
I
I
eA
Human Resource Adiieory Committee
Page q
2. Favcrable Recommendation with Stipulations: A favorable
recommendation with stipulations will mean that as agency has
sat'A fled all of the Committee's requests for information, met
their standards and has documented the community's need except
where the stipulation applies. An agency may resolve the
stipulation and precede on to a formal presentation before the
City Council without reappearing before the Committee.
3. Ynfavorable Fecommendatlon: An unfavorable recommendation will
mean that the agency has failed to satisfy the Committee's
request for Information, met their standards or documented the
community's need.
D. Agencies soliciting financial support from the City should be aware that
there may be more requests than there is money and that a favorable
recommendeMon by the Committee does not necessarily guarantee that their
agency will receive a financial commitment by the City Council.
g. The Committee will attempt to recommend a specific dollar amount to the
j Council 'or those agencies requesting financial assistance, however, the
City Council may elect to revise this specific dollar amount.
~ VII.
j ~
9_"t b lishment of Priorities for Financial Assistance Recuests: Realizing that
the City has limited financial resources for the Human Service Delivery System
and that the demand by agencies may exceed these resources, the Committee will
rank the agencies and/or their projects in accordance with the following
criteria. The priority criteria will determine the appropriateness of the
activity for funding by the City. Capacity criteria will allow ranking based
on the a',llitY of agencies to deliver services.
Agencies are rcluired to request funding each year. New agencies may apply
for start up or see{ money assistance each year for three years. After three
years agencies will noi`Oly not be funded or will have their funding cut to J
provide assistance at a maintenance level only.
City funds will not be utilized to fund activities generally regarded as the
domain of another level of government.
Priority Criteria:
1. Services provided by the agency may include any existing City service
area, (such as transportation, public safety, law enforcement, or
environmental services) and other human services in areas not now
covered by City services but which are appropriate to local government.
2. Agency provides service more coat effectively than would City
department/personnel.
r
f
Human Resource Advisory Committee
Page 5
3. Services are unduplicated within the City of Denton or do not
exceed existing levels of need.
4. City funding constitutes lees than 50% of total budget.
5. Administrative costs are not excessive in relationship to the
agency's function.
Capacity Criteria:
A. Fiscal
1. Tracking of City funds is adequate as recommended by the
Finance Department
2. Timely submittal of quarterly reports
3. An independent audit is performed unless previously waived by
1 City Council
B. Programmatic
1. Services objective met
2. Timely submittal of quarterly service reports
3. Services coordinated with other agencies
I
C. Administrative
1. Complete proposal submitted
2. Acceptable policies and procedures for provision of services
4
3. Board of Directors
VIII.
Public H a inss Condugted by the Cominlttees In order that the Committee
can assist the City in developing its annual budget where it pertains to
the Human Service Area, the Committee will conduct meetings or public
hearings. These meetings or public hearings will be specifically held
for agencies, individuals or organisations which are seeking financial
assistance from the City.
The meetings and hearings will be scheduled to coincide with the
notified development by o the h finance s diannual rector buandetprovided the Comittee has been
proposed time
schedule, the Committee will formulize its schedule and process.
Although, the schedule may vary from year to year, it will generally
convene sometime in the spring each year.
The method to be used by the Committee in determining fair share
allocation and distribution of funds will be decided in accordance to
City policy for that proposed budget year. This mthod will need to be
defined each year prior to conducting meetings and public hearings.
I
I
I
4 '
i
I
Human Resource Advisory Committee
Page 6
Notices of public hearings and meetings will be published in the newspaper and
by other means as decided by the Committee.
IX. J
Appeal Procedures: Since the Human Resource Committee sorves in an advisory
capacity to the City Council, there are no formal appeal procedures established
to provide guidance to a particular agency who has received an unfavorable
recommendation, ranked as a low priority, or had a stipulation attached to the
Committee's recommendation. It will be at the discretion of the City Council
to either uphold or disaffirm an unfavorable recommendation, stipulations or
other requirement passed by the Committee in referenca to a particular agency.
An agency however, may elect to reappear before the Committee at a later date
to produce new information, facts, or findings which may cause the Committee to
alter or revise its initial recommendation.
'F
X.
Adoption and Dlesemination of these Policies ant Procedures: The Committee
will review and adopt a set of policies and procedures. The Committee will
then prevent the policies and procedures to the City Council for their review
and adoption if so desired by the Council. The policies and procedures will
remain in effect until amended, at which time a revised set will be approved by
the Committee and resubmitted to the City Council. +
The Committee will furnish the Council and all future Councils with a copy of
the policies and procedures. Agencies requesting to appear before the
Committee will receive a copy by staff at the same time the queettonnalre is
requested. Copier may also be requested directly from the staff.
i
I
f
I
I! 1
2#07a
r~
i
44-1
r
ELIDE=
{ 1
a
I
I
F
i
WWI
e
CITY ofDENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i DENTON, TEXAS 76201 i TEL EPHONE(817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 16, 1989
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, city Manager
John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
FROM:
f
SUBJECT; JANUARY BUDGET REPORT
One-third of the fiscal year has passed and the totzl General {
Fund revenues are on target. Fift -four percent of the budget
has been received at the d y1989. over budget
receipts for the Christmas shopping sea000son of were
this was due u et
f projection by $88,000. However, $n8g1 to an
audit adjustment made by the State Comptroller's Office. ,
One area of concern is in the issuance of traffic citations.
Parking citations are down significantly from a year ago. The
number of citations issued in December, 1987 were 1,840 while i
only 644 were issued In December of 1988. In addition,
non-parking citations are down by over 500 for the s misD cem er
periods. As has been reported in the past, there also a
concern that the building activity is down slightly from budget
projections. J end Total General Fund expenditures and encumbrances ocurrent budget
January were $7,727,080. Thirty percent has been encumbered or expended daring the first third of the
and
calendar year. Overall, the budget is tracking as projected a
` there appears to be no major concerns at this point in time.
If you have any questions regarding any of the above, or need
any additional information, please advise.
Yin /c cane
JFMcG:af
4245F