HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-21-1989 T~W
I
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
November 21, 1989
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
November 21, 1989, at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of
City Ila11, 215 F. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the
following items will be considered:
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be considered as part of the Agenda for she
Regular Meeting. (NOTE: Reception for Youth In
Government participants and parents during an 8:30
p.m. Council recess for that purpose)
4:00 p.m.
I
1. Tour of proposed Capital Improvement Projects.
5:15 P.M.
1. Executive session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
I j 1. Consider action in Denton County vs. City
i and In Re: Flow.
i
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
t
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(q).
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
1. Consider appointments to the Animal Shelter
Advisory Committee and Building Code Board.
2. Consider an appointment to the civil Service
Commission.
5:45 p.m.
h
2. Hold a discussion with the Human Services Committee
concerning recently completed needs assessment,
transportation issue, and budget process for next year.
3. Hold a discussion regarding the role of the City of
Denton in providing commercial/industrial solid waste
collection services.
4. Receive and discuss a recommendation on the purchase
of a new telephone system.
i
1
I
4
1 1
y
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 21, 1989
Page 2
5. Hold a discussion regarding the Freeport Amendment.
6. Hold a discussion regarding the effect on the City of
Denton resulting from Denton Coupty'e proposed
adjustments to its 1989-90 budget.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
November 21, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 215 R. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following
items will be considered:
7:00 p.m, r
1. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular
Session of September 5, 1989, the Work Session of
September 12, 1989, the Regular Session of October 3,
1989 and the Special Called Session of October 10,
1989.
2. Public Hearings
A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Subdivision and
Land Development, of the Code of Ordinance to
exempt certain provisions of these regulations
from applying to development along certain
airports with historical significance (The
Planning and Zoning commission recommends
exemption of sidewalk provisions).
B. Hold a public hearing and consider approval of a
resolution adopting a 1989-1994 Capital
Improvement Plan and a 1994-1999 General
Government Capital Improvement Schedule. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public
Utilities Board recommend approval).
3. Consent Agenda
these Each of items recommended thereof will be strictly on the basis tthe
the f Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
is
i
.
1 Y
1 111
r A
e
N '
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 21, 1989
Page 3
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the
agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda item 4.A). This listing is provided on the
Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item
prior to approval of the ordinance.
A. kids and Purchase orders: J
1. RF'P 0104A • IBM 1
2. RFP 01027 - Wang Equipment Maintenance
4. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services. i
B. Consider adoption of an ordina,,ce amending
Chapter 8 (Municipal Court) of the lode of the W
City of Denton, Texas, by repeal of Cie existing
"Court" chapter and by adoption of a new
j "Municipal Court" chapter; providing for a N
maximum penalty of $200.00 therefore, for
' violation of Section 8-34 thereof; and providing
for publication.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of
Denton, Texas amending Chapter 10 (Fire
Prevention) of the Code of Ordinances by the
addition of Section 10-5 thereto; establishing
that any party responsible for a hazardous
material spill affecting property within the City
shall be liable for all clean-up costs incurred
by the City; and providing a severability clause.
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City o:
Denton retaining the lawfirm of Henderson Bryant
b Wolfe to represent the City of Denton in
litigation pending against the City.
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of
Denton, Texas, approving a settlement and release
{ of all claims, for pending litigation between the
City of Denton and Bvery Jack Dowling, Jr. et. al.
i
I j
I
1
i
J
F
ti
t
i
J
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 21, 1989
Page 4
5 Resolutions
A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
Coity paMadnagseirteto execute certain airport leases
fr
s for t-hangers at the Denton
Municipal Airport under certain circumstances;
and repealing Resolution R89-069.
B. Consider approval of a resolution nominating Jim
Alexander to the North Texas Council of
Government's Regional Transportation council.
6. Consider directing staff concerning access related to
the Eagle Point Subdivision, specifically involving
South Locust and Myrtle Streets.
7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
8. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
9. New Business:
This Item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
10. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f
V.A.T.S. Art. 6252-17
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Nail of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the _
1989 at
(a.m.) ay of o'clock
CITY SECRETARY
3202C
Y
i
T-111 [it LLI I
I
E
i
I
i
I
i
I +
J~
I
i
ii
J
j A A I lim. IN444 61 1-19
I
I
i
4
{
N
h
t
+.;lY CJ',,r;~1'. REF~:1F?1 V"r NY AT GA T E 1 2
K
M_:yur and '^e,7bers of the ,it
Councn i
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, MArager
SUDJ: Dlscussio:r between Human Services Committee and CounciI
regarding recently completedlJeeda Assessment, jurisdic-
tion of committee over agencies providing transportation
servicas, and HSC budget process,
RECCMM.ENDAiIOfq:
N/A
BACKGROUND:
This past surnner the Human Services Committee conducted
a survey of selectsd service providers, users and '
r comirunity leaders to assess human service needs within
the area. Res,onses were Compiled and a report issued
from HSC describing the results of the survey. Those
results will be presented to Council at this time.
I
Consideration has also been given to the possibility (1}
of removing transportation agencies from competition for
funding with service agencies under the HSC's jurisdic-
tion and (2) of providing HSC with an annual budget from
which allocations will be made to service agencies who
meet approved funding criteria. HSC wishes to discuss
these issues with Council at this time.
~ i
i SUMMARY; Materials provided include a copy of the survey,
r response data and the H50 report, Written comments from
i the survey were compiled and are available upon
! request,
I
PROGRAM,^,, DEPARTMENTS OR, GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Human Services Committee in the past has attempted
to base funding decisions nn need. They have worked
without a designated budget. The committee's decision-
making process may be altered if it is determined that
they recomrenC allocations based on a specified budget
amount. SPAN administer's elderly and handicap
transportation programs. These will be absent from the
list of service agencies requesting consideration for
funding from HSC if transportation is removed from their
jurisdtcttioo.
i
J
I
J
T-W
x,
F15CAL IMPACT:
i
N/A
z/stf l ~y bmit.t
o/d V, Harrell q
City Manager
Prepared bYl
0arbara Rnss I _ {
I Community Development Coordinator
M App )ved:
frank Robbina AICP
Executive Director for Planning a Development
r ~ L
I I i
i
I
A>ws
CITY OF DENTON NEEDS ASSESSMENT
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION
KEY INFORMANT 9UESTIONNAIRE
Name of Agency (for Agency providers)________________________
or
Profession (for selected others)______________________________
t!0TE) Processionals who are not employed by a social service or
sor:tal welfare agency should skip questions marked with an
asterisk--t.
1. i Does your agency serve? (Circle)
ae the City of Denton only
b. the city and county of Denton
c. other (Describe)
I
2. i If your agency serves both city and county, estimate what
percentage of the people you serve live in the City of
Denton?
z
3. f Are you an administrator? (Circle)
` a. Yes
Ir b. No
4. Do you live in the City of Denton? (Circle)
a. Yes (If yes, please write number of full years...)
b. No
i
S. Now long have you worked for your agency or in your i
professlon in the City of Denton? (Write in space the
number of full months.....)
Your racem (Circle) {
a. Black C. White
b. Hispanic d. Other (Describe)--„---r___
h 7. All cities have problems. In your opinion, what are the
®gat &RrAgla social welfare or social service problems in
the City ofDenton?
b.
c-
8. From the followin4 list of problems, circle ~ that you
think are the most serious In the City of Denton?
a. Marital Conflict
b. Rape
c. Racial Problems
d. Venereal Disease
e. Teenage Pregnancy
(NOTE) LIST CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE . . .
I ,
y
Y
f. Mental Retardation
g. Problems of the Physically Handica?peO
h. Problems of Raising Children
i. Family Violence
j. Unemployment
k. Child Abuse
1. Alcoholism
m. Mental Illness
n. Hunger
o. Juvenile Delinquency
p. Poverty
q. Drug Abuse
r, Crime
i. School Problems
t. Problems of Senior Citizens
u. Inadequate Health/Medical Care
v. Inadequate Affordable Housing
W. Inadequate Transportation
x. Inadequate Daycare Facilities
y. Other (Describe)__
9. What kinds of social welfare or sociai service or related
problems do you encounter most frequently in persons using
j your services, or the services of your agency? (List up
to 3)
a' -
1
b.
c'
10. f If you are an agency provider, do you feel there are
adequate resources within your agency to deal with these
problems? Please elaborate on your response, if you
circled Yes. (Circ)e)
a. Yes (Elaborate)
b. No
It. Do you feel there are adequate resources within the City of
Denton when you need to refer someone with a problem that
you or your agency doesn't deal with? (Circle)
a. you
b. No
Please elaborate un your you answered Yes-_
12. Now often have you referred people to social service
agencies in the past year? (Circle)
a. Never (0 times)
b. Seldom (1-2 times)
c. Often (3-3 times)
d. Very often (6 or more times)
PLEASE TURN TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR MORE QUESTIONS.
1
2
J
j
S
4
13. Are you part of any formal organization(s) whose purpose is
to inordinate planning for delivery of social services?
(Circle)
a. Yes If yes, what is the name of the group or groups?
1
b. No
14. What factors, if any, do you feel keep people from seeking
help from existing social service agencies or other
helping agencies? (Circle g1l that apply.)
a. It wouldn't help.
b. Lack of transportation
c. Agency usually not open when help is needed
d. Fear of what others might think
e. Cost of services
f. Location of agency
g. Don't know t.-here they are
h. Don't know that the services exists
1. None
j. Other (Describe)
I 15. What do you think are the Mggt 91424.~yg ways to inform
I people about services provided by agencies in Denton?
(Circle i&1jL that apply.)
a. Cable Television
I b. Word of mouth
c. Radio
d. Educational Talks/Lectures
e. Brochures
f. Local newspaper
g. Other (Describe)-------------
16. t In what ways does your agency inform the public about
its services? (List up to 3)
1
C.
17. QuaUkt how cooperation between you and social service/
social welfare agencies in Denton could be improved?
(Se specific, please.)
-
Is. Which of the following areas would improve cooperation
between you and othe.• social service or social welfare
agencies in the City Of Denton? (Circle jj11 that apply.) J
a. Information about type of services available
b. Contact person in the agency to assist you in mak'_ng
referrals
c. Information about fees, intake procedures,
confidentiality, etc.
(NOTE) QUESTION CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE
3
4
3
I
y.
d. Joint skill development workshop
e. Have -a-social service-forum/council
f. Additional areas (Be specific, please) 1
19. With which 3 of the following profassionals do you work
most frequently? (Circle 3)
a. Ciergy
b. Nurses
c. Law Enforcement/Corrections Personnel .a
d. School Personnel
e. Social Workers
f. Medical Doctors
{ U. Psychiatrists
h. Counselors
1. Psychologists +
j. Lawyers
20. List up to ;j social service or social welfare agencies in
the City and/or County that you work most frequently with.
a-
c.
21. Do you think that additional social service or social
welfare agencies are needed in this city? (Circle)
a. No
b. Yes (If yes, please list Wl; tg a types needed.)
22. Do you encounter problems making referrals to social f
service or social welfare agencies in the City of Denton?
(Circle)
as No
b. Yes (If yes, please describe problem(s) below.)
+ 23. Is it clear to you what social service or social welfare
agencies in the city will handle what problems? (Circle)
a. Yes
b. No (if no, please explain below).
24. On a sspar•ate sheet, please write anything also about
{ social welfare or social services in the City of Denton
that you may wish to tell us about.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN HELPING US TO IMPROVE SOCIAL
SERVICES AND SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICE; LN THE CITY OF DENTON.
4
a
d
W
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL ON NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY
from
HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
INTRODUCTION
To keep City Council aware of the level of basic human need
in the communitys the Human Services Committee conducted a Needs
Assessment Survey during the Spring of 1959. The committees with
the assistance of Richard Enos, a member of the Human Services
Committee and a member of the social work faculty of the
University of North Texas, devised a survey questionnaire based
on the key informant method of data gathering. The committee
Identified 273 key informants in Denton, comprising leaders in
civic, services religiouss social work, business, medical,
educational, and charitable areas of the community. The list
included spokespersons for the minority communities and
representatives of a broad economic spectrum. It also included
key individuals who happen neither to require nor provide
j services but who have occasion to refer others to needed human
services.
Several members of Leadership Denton's 1988-89 class ~I
conducted personal interviews of a randomly chosen sample group
of the key Informants to test the suitability of the survey
instrument. Following the test interviews, the committee mailed
the survey to the remaining key informants. Of the 273
questionnaires sent out, 122 were returned, a return of 45
percent which was more than was needed to render the results
statistically reliable. Dr. Ethelyn Davis, formerly a member of
the Human Services Committee, compiled the raw data for the
committee. (See Addendum A.) many of the questionnaires
contained handwritten verbal replies that provided additional
valuable Information which is not included with the raw data
presented In the attached results.
i~
The Human Services Coe ;..lee extends its thanks and
appreciation to Dr. Davies Dr. Enos, and to the Leadership Denton
members who assisted in the survey--Sherrie Etheredges Nelda
Evarts, Amanda Hulcher, Thomas Judd, Sandra Kristoferson, Richard
Norton, Jean Ellen Rogers, Bill Watsons Mike Widmer, cs)d Virginia
Williams--, and to the key informants who provided us with
i valuable and otherwise inaccessible information.
1
J
w
h
l
4
KEY INFORMANTS
The informants who responded, all anonymously, to the survey
identified themselves as 47 who were associated with specific
human services-related agencies, offices, or programsl 30 who
were associated with the educational systems as teachers,
administrators, or counselors, and 45 who had other connections
with the issues of human Services. One hundred listed themselves
as white, 12 as Hispanic, 9 as black, and I chose not to
indicate.
r
SUMMARY OF MAJOR PERCEIVED NEEDS
Overwhelmingly, the respondents indicated that the foremost
area of need in Denton is health care. Out of a list of twenty-
four problems, "Inadequate health/medical care" was selected as
one of the three most serious
problems
half (64) of the respondents. When asked to indicate in theirone
own words the areas of greatest need, again more than half listed
some form of health care or medical related issue.
j
Following after health care, but still receiving significant
mention, were lack of affordable housing, substance abuse, lack
of public transportation, insufficient child day care, child
abuse, family violence, lack of facilities for homeless or
transient persons, and unemployment.
Respondents mentioned lack of public transportation both as
a human services need in its own right and as one of the problems
connected with the effective delivery of existing services.
Other areas related to the delivery of services that respondents
Mentioned frequently were an inadequate, or at least
insufficiently advertised, information and referral structure,
the lack of a communications network among services providers,
and the lack of a mechanism to keep track of clients who appeal
to more than one agency within the system.
ADDITIONAL AREAS OF AGREEMENT
~I
f Respondents commented on three other points often enough to
! give a clear indication of general agreements
1) Respondents stressed the Importance of making efforts to
meet the special needs of persons whose firpt language is Spanish
by using Spanish whenever possible in written or spoken
communication with them and by Initiating outreach programs to
them.
i
Y
V
`f
I
0.
i
is
1
I 2) Respoi~dants consistently gave overall approval to the
quality of the existing human services and gave high praise to
the people who work to provide them, mentioning overwork, stress,
and insufficient pay as problems facing persons who work in
social services fields.
h 3) Respondents gave unsolicited praise to the City of Denton,
commenting that Denton is a good place to live and that Denton is
to be commended for the level of concern for human services that
it already has.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Because the Human Services Committee is charged not only
with keeping the City council aware of Human Services needs but {
also with making recommendations to the Council to address those
needs, the Committee at its June S. 1989 meeting discussed the
results of the Needs Assessment Survey and makes the following
recommendations to City Councils
1. HEALTH CARE
The Human Services Committee recommends that city council
take the fallowing actions which will help the citizens assume
j their responsibilities in the area of health cares
a) that council state its willingness to provide financial
support to nonprofit agencies engaged in primary health
care, especially in the form of giving matching funds)
b) that council make a commitment to designate funds and I
staff time, as soon as possible, to assess, analyze, and
propose a plan for the citizens of Denton to assume
responsibility for a primary health care program in the
cityl and
c) that council designate persons to seek outside funding
for primary health care.
(See Addendum B.)
2. HOUSING
E The Human Services Committee recommends that the city
continue to support and, where possible, eepand its efforts in
all areas providing housing for low income, residents. These
include existing city programs for housing r.-habilitation,
existing city support to nonprofit agencies helping in housing
areas, continued efforts at encouraging low cost home
construction, and investigation into the feasibility of shelter
arrangements for the homeless.
1
. a ~
r
L
I
3. DELIVERY OF SERVICES
The Human !Services Committee recommends that City Council
appoint several citizens who, with staff support, will contact
leaders of groups involved in information and referrals
networking, and client tracking, to help them to work more
f closely with one another and to determine whether or not there Is
a way within the city structure to assist them.
(See addendum C.)
I
4. TRANSPORTATION
The Human Services Committee recommends that the city
planning department, working with the Director of SPAN, continue
efforts to form the nucleus of a public transportation network
for Denton and that as soon as possible transportation be made a
separate area in the city budget.
RATIONALE
The City Council of the City of Denton in 1976 did not vote
to make tax dollars available to human service agencies primarily
sut of a humanitarian impulse to relieve human suffering, as
noble as that sentiment may be, but rather, out of a conviction
that citizens whose basic human needs are not met cannot be ~
expected to become productive, contributing members of the
community. More than likely, individuals whose basic needs are
not met will become costly burdens for taxpayers. As a result,
supporting basic human services agencies protects the quality of
} life of all citizens when it improves the quality of life of the
few whose lives are touched by special problems.
i
J
I
EDUCATION
1 Denton Regional Day School for Deaf
1 DISD Trustee
1 Headstart teacher
F 1 Health Educator
2 Counselor
1 Psychologist
1 Constable
1 Denton County DA `
2 Denton Police
1 Justice of the Peace
4 City of Denton
1 AIDE Committee in Local Church, Chairman
1 Denton Bible Church
F 1 Denton Gospel Mission
F 1 St. Andrew COGIC
1 Denton County Health Dept.
1 Life Planning Health Services
' 2 physicians
1 Administrator
1 attorney
F 1 Business
1 Denton County Indigent Care I
1 Emily Fowler Public Library 1
l 1 Government Administration
f I 1 Legal Assistant
2 Retired
1 Self-employed
1 Woodrow Wilson PTA
9 No Answer
1 Can't Read the Answer M
QUESTION 1
E Does Your Agency Serve?
j 10 City of Denton only
` 35 City and County of Denton
I 21 Other (i surrounding countieel anyone)
51 No An
QUESTION 2
` If your agency serves both city and county, estimate what percentage of the
hf people you Serve live in the City of Denton:
1 91 to 241
{ 7 251 to 491
17 Sol to 741
24 751 to 991 i
' l 1001
1 725 students
Z Unknown
65 No anawer
1
•i 1
v n
f 1
r
QUESTION 3_
14 Are you an administrator?
51 Yes
11 No
47 NO answer
QUESTION
Do you live in the City of Denton? If yess please write the number of full
years:
1s No
12 Yes, but no length of time given.
14 One to four years
U Five to nine years
12 Ten to fourteen years
14 Fifteen to nineteen Yeats ears
11 Twenty to twenty nine g Thirty to thirty nine years
g Forty and over
{ QUESTION 5
Bow long have you worked for your agency in your profession in the City of
Denton? write in number of full months.
A
27 One month to LAo years
`C 38 Two years to eight years
16 Eight years to twelve years
17 Twelve year-$ to sixteen yeas
6 Sixteen years to twenty year
7 Over twenty years
k 6 No answer
I
QUESTION 6 `
Your Race:
g7 white
10 Hispanic
g Slack
1 No answer
i
1
i
r-
b
i
M
r '
z
a:
Z QUESTION 7
All cities have problems. In your opinion, what are the three most serious
social welfare of social service problems in the City of Deiton7
59 Health care for low income (affordable, low costr etc.)
33 Lack of affordable housing for low income
30 Substance sale and use, lack of programs for
23 Lack of public transportation
21 Lack of child/day care for low income
18 Homeless and transient--lack of facilities
12 Child abuse
12 Lack of m atal health care/services
10 Unemployment or underemployment
8 Marital conflict/families in crisls
6 Teenagw pregnancy
5 Lack of public hospital
5 Lack of public hospital
5 Lack of coordination of agencies and services
5 Poverty/lack of money
4 Lack of youth services
4 No central I i R
3 Crime
3 Juvenile Justice System
3 Prenatal/postnatal care
3 School dropouts
2 Care for elderly
2 Divorce
2 Emergency aid
2 Job training
2 Lack of comprehensive work program
2 Lack of dental care/clinic
2 Lack of Lob opportunities
2 Lack of psychiatric services
2 Preventive health services
2 Public education for all children
2 Illiteracy
1 Child services
1 Children's rest home facilities
1 Chronic illness
1 Cooperation of agencies de,iling with family violence
1 Denton County Health Department
1 Elderly who live alone
1 Environmental health
1 family services
1 Pew services for mentally retarded living at home
1 Inadequate community awareness and involvement
1 Juvenile delinquency
1 Lack of awarenesa of services available
1 Lack of birth control for low income
1 Lack of Patent Support groups
1 Lawyers for low income
1 Mental health services for adolescents
I 1 More facilities for abuse victims
I 1 Near poor who do not qualify for services
4 i
Y
g4
QUESTION 7 (Continued)
1 Need coordinated housing/repair assistance programs
I No drug/alcohol options for indigent adolescents
1 No facility for testing for AIDS
1 No planned future county facility for indigent
1 Not enough bilingual personnel
1 Nowhere to get miney for prescriptions
1 Physicians reuponsible for closing Flow by not referring
1 Poverty level of single parents with children
1 Proper nutrition
1 Racial problem:,
I Respite care for care givers
1 School problems
1 Services for the pcor
1 Temporary shelter for families
r 1 Temporary housing
1 Unscrupulous law}ers
1 Unsupervised children
2.UESTION 8 I
1
From the following list of problems, circle the three that you think are the j
most serious in the City of Denton:
I
61 u. Inadequate health/medical care
42 q. Drug abuse
39 Y. Inadequate affordable housing
29 e. Teenage pregnancy
23 w. Inadequate transportation
20 k. Child abuse
1s i. Family violence
17 p. Poverty
37 x. inadequate day care facilities
15 J. Unemployment
12 s. School problems
{ 11 h. Problems of raising children
11 1. Alcoholism 1
11 a. Marital conflict
9 M. Crime
8 r. Mental illness
7 o. Juvenile delinquency
S to Problems of senior citizens
S c. Racial problems
/ d. Venereal disease
+ 3 b. Ripe
3 g, Problems of the physically handicapped
3 no Hunger {
2 f. Mental retardation
I
i
r ° ~I
R
QUESTION 10
If you are an agency provider, do you feel there are adequate resources within
your agency to deal with these problems?
8 Yes
62 No J
47 No answer 1
QUESTION 11 I
Dc you feel there are adequate resources within the City of Denton when you
need to refer someone with a problem that your agency does not deal with?
86 No
20 Yes
11 No answer
QUESTION 12
++I
How often have you referred people to social service agencies In the past year? 1
77 do very often (6 or more times)
24 c. Often (3 to 5 times)
11 be Seldom (1-2 times)
2 a. Never (0 times)
3 No answer
QUESTION 13
I f
Are you part of any formal organization(s) whose purpose is to coordinate
planning for delivery of social services? JI
45 Yes 1
66 No
6 No answer
QUESTION 14
what factors, if any, do you feel keep people from seeking help from existing
social service agencies or other helping agencies? Circle all that apply.
96 he Do not know that the services exist.
i~ 64 be Lack of transportation
55 a. Cost of services
49 g. Do not know where they are
30 c. Agsncy usually not open when help is needed
24 d. Pear of what others night think
j 20 f. Location of agency
18 a. It would not help
i I. Nona
33 J. Other
1 1" low
4
QUESTION 15
What do you think are the three most effective ways to inform people about
services provided by agencies in Denton? Circle all that apply.
87 f. Local newspaper
74 b. Word of mouth
59 e. Rrochures
35 c. Radio
29 d. Educational talks/lectures
28 a. Cable television
12 9. Othec i
1 No answer
QUESTION 18
Which of the following areas would improve cooperation between
you
and social service or social welfare agencies in the City of Denton? Circle tall
that apply.
l 87 a. Information about types of services available
71 b. Contact person in agency to assist you in making
69 c. Information about fees, intake procedures, etc.
67 e. Have social service forum/council referrals
35 d. Joint akill development workshop
15 f. Additional areas
i
V
J
QUESTION 19
With which three of the following professionals do you work most frequently?
j (Circle 3).
i
59 e. Social worke:a
52 d. School personnel
41 f. Medical doctors
37 h. Counselors
36. c. Law enforcement/corrections personnel
30 a. Clergy
27 b. Nurses
17 Lawyers
15 is Psychologists
` 7 9. Psychiatrists
r QUESTION 21
~ I Do you think that additional social service or social welfare agencies are
needed in this City?
60 Yes
39 No
13 No answer
5 Do not know
i
l
V
t y
QUESTION 22
Do you encounter problems making referrals to social service or social welfare
agencies in the City of Denton?
43 Yes
62 No
12 No answer
QUESTION 23
Is it clear to you what social service or social welfare agencies in the city
will handle what problems?
61 Yes
T~ 41 No
5 No answer
1 Yes usually
1 Yes mostly {
I~ 2 Fairly well
` 1 Not always
1 Some ambiguity
I Some overlaps or gaps
3 Sometimes or somewhat ,
i
i
i
C
1994k
T~W
x
s4
a
h
I
i
ADDENDUM A
City of Denton Needs Assessment Survey
Total Number of Responses
Respondents 122
AGENCIES
1 Community Food Center
1 Denton County Child Protective Services
1 Denton Christian Preschool
1 Denton City-County Day Nursery
1 Denton County Cooperative Ministries
1 Denton County MHMR Center
1 Denton County Prenatal Clinic
1 Denton County Veterans service office
I Denton Housing Authority
1 Denton Riwanis Children's Clinic
Denton Lifeline
2 Denton State School (I from volunteer Services)
I Denton YMCA
1 Fred Moore Clothing Room
1 Fred Moore Day Nursery
1 Friends of the Family
1 Gerontology Assesament/planning
1 Headatart (social service coordinator)
Heritage Oaks Senior Citizens Community
HOPE
i Human Resources Committee
Immaculate Conception Catholic Church Social Worker
I Meals on Wheels
1 North Texas Alcohol a Drug Service
2 RSVP
I Senior Support Services (Eldercenter)
I Social Security Administration
3 Social Worker
1 SPAN
I Texas Employment
I TWU Speech A Hearing Clinic
2 Texas Department of Human Services
I UNT Psychology Clinic
I UNT Speech i Hearing Clinic
1 UNT Vocational Rehabilitation
I Visiting Nurse Association of Texas
I West Texas Legal Services
1 WIC (Women, Infants, Children)
EDUCATION
24 Educator (public schools i universities)
1 North Texas Education and Training Coop
x
3
9
ADDENDUM 8
Health care is an issue of nationwide concern that is perhaps
aggravated in the City of Denton by recent political events. The
following brief outline of the complex health care issue might
clarify which specific area the committee believes is the mayor
concern in Dentoni
First, public health is not basically a city issue. Public
health matters, such as inspections, immunizations, health
regulation enforcement, and so forth, are the responsibility
of county government.
Second, hospital care is not a city issue. Hospital care
for the indigent and medically indigent is handled partly
through the county's Indigent Health Care plan, partly (a
j very small part) through Medicaid, and the remainder,
comprising those who qualify for crisis hospital treatment,
become the responsibility of the private hospitals. We
need to note that the Physicians who attend the hospitalized
indigent are not reimb.trsed.
Third, Medicaid in Texas co,ters only children under two year
of age and pregnant women in families that meet State
poverty guidelines and the poor who are seriously disabled
for more than a year. However, only one obstetrician in
Denton will accept Medicaid patients, and many low income
women are not eligible for Medicaid for themselves and their
children, so this group remains at risk.
Thersforei
The focus of the problem in the City of Denton is primary
health care, that is, medical care that is not at a life-or-
death emergency level, for low income adults from ages 18 to
650 for pregnant women, and for children not eligible for
Medicaid.
We can build a strong case for providing primary health care
rased an human compassion) perhaps we can build a stronger
case based on the knowledge that preventive care and early
intervention are always less expensive in the long run than
+ crisis care, whether for an individual or a community.
1 ~
f
i
9
{
RjF 3' ~
ADDENDUM C
The United Way of Denton Count
referral, the Denton County HumanrServicesnDirectory isda
good referral tool, and volunteers at the Emily Fowler
Library are compiling Information for a computerized
information bank. Part of the problem with information and
referral, however, is that individuals needing assistance
access the human services system at many different points
(county agencies, nonprofits, private providers, churches,
personal physicians, schools, and many other places).
Unless people at all of these places know how to access the
system, individuals who are in need may never find out about
available services.
I
Several instances of provider networking are operating in
the city, and at least one effort at client tracking is
being organized.
All of the above-mentioned efforts would be
if they could be coordinated and su greatly enhanced
pportcil-
appointed committee might be able to
serve•asAac catalyst to
bring them into focus.
3 '
N
I
I
!I ~
I
1
J
f
EMI~
1
1
t li
I
i
I
I
E
1
i
a
1
1[r
I
I
Y i
s DATE' November 210 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT.
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A DISCUSSION REGARDING THE ROLE OF THE CITY IN PROVIDING COWER-
CIAL/INDUSTRIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
RECOMMENDATION:
The Solid Waste Alternatives Casmittee unanimously recommends the
City become the exclusive cormierclal/Industrial service provider. 1
,A
BACKGROUND:
' Over a year ago, the solid waste commlttee was appointed to examine
the role of the City in providing solid waste services.
I
SLFt4ARY : j
i~ Discussion will focus on options for provision of commer-
cial/industrial solid waste services.
k PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: a
IM Commercial/Industrial solid waste services, the Solid Waste Division..
r i and all solid waste customers.
Il FISCAL IMPACT: I
I Varies with each alternative course of action.
Respectf y submitted i
I 1
Lloyd .Harrell
City Manager
Pre red by:
f i
Charles S. Watkins
Superlntendent
Solid Waste D1v1s1on
111
Approved by:
I
B~~ ge1Ja~
Director of Community Services i
1W1/111384015
J
ALTERNATIVES FOR PROVISION OF
CMIERCIAL/INDUSTP.IAL SOLID WASTE SERVICES
1. City becomes the exclusive commercial/TndustrTal solid waste
service provider. (SWAC recommendation) J
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
o No rate Increase for exist- o Terminate private contracts.
Ing customer's. o Rate Increase for some new
i
o Break even financially customers.
FY 89-90. o Criticism for future rate
I o Retire landfill debt at Increases.
closure. o Concern over loss of
o Revenues exceed expenditures competition.
after FY 89-90.
Minimize rate increase
needed to comply with
EPA regulations and to
fund new landfill.
o Easy to reverse decision,
~I
I I
2. Continue to have "open" corm ercial/Industrial solid waste
col- lection, A. Enter into franchise agreements with private haulers In which
_ the Clty reserves the right to direct the waste stream and
E charges the haulers a franchise fee based upon gross receipts.
A 5% franchise fee would generate approximately 15,000 per
year or $260250 for the remainder of FY 89-90, whlc'-i would be
I i
IWl/111589019/1
li
4 a
e 4...
LA
1
directed to the solid waste fund and Increase City rates as
follows effective January 1, 1990: J
Residential $.15 per month (1.68)
Dunpster $.06 per yard (3.98)
Roil-off $.40 per yard (7.68)
B. If a franchise fee Is not charged to private haulers or
directed to general fund, rates would need to be Increased as
follows:
Residentlal $.20 per month (2.28)
DL"ster $.08 per yard (5.38) I
Roll-off $.53 per yard (108)
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
o Allows competitlon. o Eroslon of City customer base
o Break even for FY 89-90. still a concern.
o Potential decreasing customer
base will result In Increased
residential and landfill
j rates.
o Rate Increase needed to
comply with EPA regulations
could be more substantial.
o Rate Increase needed to fund
debt service on new landfill
could be more substantial.
I
IWI/111589019/2
i
F .
b
3
t
e
3. Direct the staff to prepare two bid specifications, one exclusive
and another for non-exclusive services, for the sale of the City
corrmerclalO ndustrial solid waste system. if this option is
chosen, an lnterlm City rate Increase Is needed: i
Residential $.20 per month (2.29)
Durpster $.08 per yard (5.39)
Roll-off $.53 per yard (109)
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
o Able to obtain more in- o Require rate Increase In the
formotlon, such as: Interim.
- Rates. o Require about 5 months to
- Feasibility of more prepare specifications and
than one service receive bids.
provider. o Interim rate Increase may
drive customers away.
t
t
1W1/111589019/3
IMF-
Y ,
F
i'
Should the City become the exclusive service provider, cost and revenue
is estimated as follows for each of the first three (3) years of provld-
Ing all services.
Cost Revenue
Shortfall $111,245
Equipment and Personnel 259,335 $6820636
Disposal 212,500
$583,080
Balance of Revenues $ 99,556
r
After the first three (3) years, the new containers would be paid off.
Cost and revenues are estimated as follows: N
J
Cost Revenue
Shortfall $111,245
Equipment and Personnel 159,335 $6820636
Disposal 212,500
$483,080
Balance of Revenues $1990556
1
1
i
I
IWI/111589019/5
i
i. q
y
If the City Cormerclai solid waste collection system Is sold and an
exclusive franchise is granted, It Is estimated that funds from the sale
would be sufficient to retire the landfill debt upon closure of the
facility. However, only approximately $232,000 per year would be
available for debt service for a new facility. Debt service for a new
facility is expected to cost approximately $500,000 per year. The
additional funds needed to fund the debt service would require a rate
increase at the dlsposal facility of approximately $.82 per cubic yard
which would be passed along to the customers of the hauler. This would
also require a rate Increase of approximately $.41 per month to all
residential customers. The rate Increase needed may exceed this amount
if cash and contract Customers who are not required to use the City
landfill go elsewhere.
i
i
1WI/111589019/6
i
w.
3
f ~ ,1
`t
ISSUES/QUESTIONS RAISED BY CI'fiZENS r
PAST REASDN
CITY GIVEN FOR
NAME AFFILIATION CUSTOMER CANCELLATION COMMENTS
Joe Bendzick Greater South- 1972-79 Irregular No records j
1100 Skylark west Properties service found since
(Apartments) 1962.
Joan Hallberg Mill Run Cancelled Price/ Gave 30 days written
2500 N. I-35 Phase II 6-30-89 poor service notice on 6-1-89.
j _ Eddie Hard" in Yes Irregular No records
' 2041 W. Oak service found since
` 1982.
Gayla Brown Jimmy Brown Yes Poor old contract found,
405 W. Univ. Realty service no date on it.
They currently have an apartment on Fallmeadow which uses a City of Denton
dumpster. However, tenants pay for their half of it. It is shared with
another apartment nest door. 1 h 202 Hollyn11? Finance
v
Stated that Greenville, McKinney, Humble and Galveston rates are
considerably less than current City of Denton rates. A
See attached rate information for thew cities.
Bonnie Murf Denton North No
3219 Fallmeadow Apartments
She requested City of Denton open top container on two occasions. City
didn't have any available when she needed them for a re-roofing Job.
Ben Perry PaceA No
2411 S. I-39E Crossing
Stated that TWM painted their dumpsters 6 months ago and they were being
painted again that weekend.
' City of Denton also has a refurbishing program. 400 dumpsters were
refurbished during the 1988-89 budget year.
Ann Gilllspe Property No
2912 Augusta Manager
She called the City the day of the hearing and agked what charges would
be for 6/3yd dumpsters serviced 3X a week. Dur current rate is
$311,04. TWM charges her $237.37. This charge is t4B.29 less than the rate
indicated on their Trenton rate schedule. Also, this is apnrosimately j
36.00 less than the 1986 City of Denton rate
ISSUES/QUESTIONS RAISED BY CITIZENS
PAST REASON
CITY GIVEN FOR
NAME AFFILIATION CUSTOMER CANCELLATION COMMENTS
Jeannie Vardeman Colorado Court No
Apartments
They have individual trash cans at the track door c4 each apartment.
Would the City service them at the back doors or would they be required
to get a dumpster? The ordinance specifies service by commercial containers,
although the Division would wort: with the customers to address their concerns.
Bob Hooper Linwood Roberson 1971 Poor No records
Florist Service found since
1982
I
i
~ j
3
i
3
3
I
1
4 V
PUBLIC HEARING ON SOLID WASTE
OTHER QUESTIONS AND ISSUES
Mr. Ayer asked when the report had become available to those who asked
for It.
July 18, 1989
_ .r
Mr. Boyd asked the Comittee to address why there has to be an exclusive
f ranchI se.
i
The SWAC is concerned that the Costs to the customer for
camiercial/Industrial solid waste collection would Increase
considerably if the City goes out of the commercial/Industrial
solid waste business. Funds from the sale of the City solid
waste system need to be sufficient to retire the landfill
development bond when the landfill is full. Potential pur-
chasers are not likely to offer much money for the City
accounts if there is no assurance that the purchaser will be
I able to keep the accounts for a reasonable length of time,
which Indicates that In order to obtain fair value for the
.
City cormiercial accounts and equipment, an exclusive franchise
would probably have to be a part of the sale of the system.
I
i
1W1/111589017/5
V low
jk.
I
Ms. McAdams asked if private haulers were no longer using the Tandfill,
would It still be appropriate for the City to eliminate comrercTal
haulers.
If the City sold its commercial solid waste collection system
and directed the commercial service provider(s) to another
landfill, the City would gain 10 to 12 years of additional
life from the landfill, but the cost per yard of waste would i
increase by approximately $3.55 per cubic yard. This would
create a need for a resldentlal rate Increase of approximately
$2.79 per month because residential solid waste would In all
probability be the only user of the City landfTll.
c
E I
3 If the City continued In business but private haulers were no
longer using the landfill, there would continue to be concerns
related to loss of City customers and It would probably have
f the effect of driving up the cost for disposal. $6
I 1
i
l
I
I
I
i 1
1W1/111589017/6
i
w ar♦
tV eu
Ms, McAdams requested information related to funds transferred to
General Goverment from the Solid Waste Division.
The transfer for FY 89-90 is $394,737 to cover the cost of
services provided to Solid Waste from General Govenment
Departments consistent with charges to other enterprise funds.
Residential $218,355
- , Commercial $117,581 ,11
Disposal S 58,791
it
j {
f
E
I
i i
i
I
I
I J
1
1wi/111589017/8
f ~
t
x
89-90 1988 1989 4989 lygy
DENTCN GALVESTON MCNI%EY GREENVILLE HURBLE
-
Residential Service A 8 B-- See below
Monthly Charge 9.25 11.75 5.90 6.30 curb
No. of Households 14,200 20,000 4.800 9,7025.~000ut
Service Frequency Wweek Wwtek 2X/ueek 2X/week 1
Service Method Bias Bags Bags
or cans
i
Free Bags Wyear No No
Budget 2,783,474
General Fund Subsidy No No .i
General Fund Transfer 394,737 475,000
Other Services Litter See below No No
Special Collection lX/ueek See below Call-in Wwcek
Special Charge No No 425 per I/2 hr No
Disposal Facility Public Public Public Private
Not of Facility Denton Gulf Coast Mckinney North TX
Landfill Transfer Landfill Services
Site (T0f)
Carnercial Service E Set below B t
Franchise Fee Mont None 47 of Revenue V. of Gross
Revenues
} Disposal Facility Municipal Private ilur'cipal Private
t Nine of Facility Denton BFI Mckionir North TX
Landfill Alvin LlndfilF Sesvis
Galveston --DTHER SERVICES-- Street sweeping and litter crew.
--SPECIALS-- Brush is picked vi Wwitk. The litter crew picks up
appliances and other lirge itms on I call in basis 5 days a week,
-assigneedAterritlorits or franchises, have theroireiworking on going
to a franchise arringenent.
Greenville --TUB-OUT, Private contractor will haul containers from backyard or
h garage.
Humble --Private contractors, No assigned territories. City was not able to provide
- ------rate-information.
PE_SIDEMIAL SERVICE C"ERCIAL SERVICE
Municipal collection A. Municipal Collection
0. Private contractor B. Private contractor with exclusive franchise
C. Private contractors with C. Private, contra tors with assigned territories
0. s
Municipaltirpriviliswith E. Municipal & apinala wechassigned terrilapits
pp
assigned territories no ticlW it franchist
I
TWM
Pvt/Exc Pvt/Exc GALVESTOIJ
CONTAINER PENTON MCKINNEY GREENVILLE HUMBLE
Mar '89 '88 Rates 89 Rates
2Yd Privates, no $1.51 to
1 Dump/Week 1;16.46 assigned terri- 1.91 per
2 Dump/Week 25.36 tories, no cubic
3 Dump/Week 38.04 franchises. yard.
4 Dump/Week 48.72 City was not
5 Dump/Week 60.90 able to provide
6 Dump/Week 71.52 rate informa-
tion.
3yd
1 Dump/Week $24.69 $38.10 $54.9
4 55. 7
2 Dump/Week 38.04
3 Dump/WeEk 54.81 72.00 100.46
4 Dump/Week 71.52 90.00 123.94
5 Dump/We e1: 89.40 107.00 145.43 I
7.28 101.92
106 Dump/Week
I
4yd
1 Dump/Week $25.36 142.00 $63.98
2 Dump/Week 4E 72 70.00 91.96
3 Dump/Week 71.52 92.00 119.94
4 Dump/Weak 95.36 114.00 149.92
5 Dump/Week 119.20 136.00 2177.90
20.88
6 Dump/Week 143.04
6yd
$38.04 $79.97
j 1 Dump/Week 71.52 119.94
2 Dump/Week _ 163.92
j 3 Dump/Week 107.28 208.88
4 Dump/Week 143.04 _ 253.86
5 Dump/Week 177.30 _ 304.34
6 Dump/Week 212.76
8yd 94
1 Dump/Week $95.36 $94 $94 ..92
2 Dump/Week 143.36 204.68
3 Dump/Week 252.34
4 Dump/Week 189.12 32000
5 Dump/Week 236.40 3H4.76
6 Dump/Week 283.69
lp
1 Dump/ /Week
2 Dump/Week
3 Dump/Week
4 Dump/Week
S Dump/Week
6 Dump/Week
1
I
SOLID WASTE `4
INFORMATION
1 ~ J
i ~
E
1
i
i
1ST2S104338/1
~T
W *-w
0 1
F..
e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BACKGROUND
RECOMMENDATION
SURVEY
4
RATE COMPARISON
I
TEXAS WASTE MANAGEMENT'S DENTON RATE SCHEDULE
j TEXAS wHsTE MANAGEMENT VS CITY OF DENTON RATES
I
j SURVEY OF CHARGES
CURRENT CITY RATES
COST/REVENUE ESTIMATE FOR CITY ASSUMPTION OF SERVICES
i
ANTICIPATED EFFECT UPON DISPOSAL RATE IF COMMERCIAL SOLID
WASTE IS SOLD
i
1ST2SID9331/1
I~
I
&4CKGRMM
i
t
I
i
II
1
f
1ST2S109338/2
T..
or low
Sd
i
Y
3
Y -
Pier the It= yeor, the Sel;d Waste Alternatives Committee read numerous
articles and reports, listened to a fair number of knowledgeable people de-
scribe va-lous aspects of solid waste disposal and why It should be done one
way or arlot'ier, and most importantly of a11, asked the City staff assisting the
committee to research a lot of factual questions, the results of which were
discussed at great length In the Wednesday evening meetings. It became clear
very quickly that the issues did not separate Into individual questions to be
answered one way or another. The Issues are interwoven, and while some leeway
exists, the reccrmmendatIons are the result of broad consideration of the entire
fabric of questions In the Ilght of what Is best for the people of Denton now
and some reasonable expectation of what the future is likely to bring.
I
The committee studied the current situations at other cities, trying to draw
from the experience and efforts of others. But in some ways Denton Is unique.
Nut oily i5 Mm;ton currently in the wild waste collection business, Denton has
Its own landfill. Denton also has Its own power generating plant, power
distribution grid, and utility billing system. All of these play a part In the
recommendations.
i
f
I
~-r
I
i
i
15T251093111/2
r
RECCM•IENDATICN
i
f
1
I
li 1
I ~
I {
i
I
1ST25109338/3
v
F
Tlyd Sulfd Waste AlLeriatlyas CuimiLtee rr ca:nenue Lhe Lity of Denton become
exclusive commercial, and industrial solid waste collection service provider.
During its analysis, the committee has considered the potential Impact of
continuing to allow rOpen, commercial /industrial collection; has carefully
considered selling the City conmerclal system and privatizing corner-
vial/Industrial solid waster and has analyzed the potential of assigning
territories within the City to solid waste service providers.
i
In recent yearn there has been considerable cultivation of the camnercial solid
waste disposal business In Denton by private haulers. The service agreement
used by the City's principal competitor is for a term of three (3) years, and
Is automatically renewed for like terms thereafter unless either party gives
written notice at least sixty (60) days prior to the termination of the Initial
Laren or any renewal tenn. If the customer tennlnates tlw agreement other
as provided, the customer agrees to pay liquidated damages. than
The service agreement allows the contractor to Increase charges in an amount
~ equal to any Increase In disposal or fuel costs and allows adjustments to
reflect Increases In the Consumer Pricu Index. Their
schedule
also be adjusted for reasons other than Increases In disposal orofuelacosts or
the Consumer Price index, subject to approval by the customer.
The rate schedule currently used by Texas Waste Mann
the 1986-87 rates charged by the Bement is a duplicate of
City
customers regarding the rate they are or were charged by Texas Wast,aMa agent
does not conform to their rate schedule, and In sane instances, there are
substantial disparities In the charges for conparrble lovels of service.
If the City of Denton was to go out of the solld custaner would have no viable alternar.lve, we bPliP"n waste ^business, so that the
.,t to th9 cust:rer
I
IST2S109331/3
i
i
mould be Increased considerably above the rates currently charged by the City I
of Denton. This belief is reinforced by looking at the commercial rates the
private haulers are charging commercial customers in nearby cities, and compar-
ing those rates to the rates those same private haulers are charging customers
In Denton. The committee heard presentations from both Browning Ferris Indus-
tries and Texas Waste Management, the two largest private haulers In the Denton
i area. Both companies spoke of the absolute need of long-tens contracts, five
t
{ years or more, and the absolute requirement to be able to pass through cost
increases to the customer. Data from other titles served by these companies
Indicates that this type of contract results In fees higher than those charged
by either of those companles within the City of Denton or by Denton Itself.
I
k ~
The presence of numerous collection service providers in the same area contrlb-
l utes to the dilution of the service area to a point In which revenues generated
are insufficient to cover costs or provid4 a reasonable return on investment.
' The pricing tactics of the private companies could lead to erosion of the ~
City's customer base, thus depriving the City of its most valuable marketable
I asset.
The survey of commercial rates for dunpster services shows the City of Denton
to be below the rates charged In other cities. Many of these cities are served
by the same major companies who currently serve Denton. In the area of roll-
off services, Denton Is typically below or ccnpetltlve with other titles in the
area.
For dumpster services, Texas Waste Management's rates are below the current
City of Denton rate. The rate schedule used by Texas Waste Management prior to
April 15, 1989) is a duplicate of the City of Denton 1986-87 rate schedule.
Infonnatlon obtained by the staff demonstrates that the actual charges by Texa!
Waste Management to some of their customers do not conform to their rate
1ST2S109331/4
I
IF low
I
schedule, and in some instances there are substantial disparities in the
charges for comparable levels of service.
service a4regiment, general underpricing of the City, along with
The use of the inequitable charges, leads to concerns regarding the potential for the erosion
of the City's customer base and to concerns regarding the effect of selling the
City commercial system and granting an exclusive franchise to a private compa-
ny, particularly when reviewing the rates charged by Texas Waste Management In
the City of Lewisville where they have an exclusive franchise. It Is also
j interesting to note that the DFW Landfill (whlch is owned by Waste Management)
Is located In Lewisville and their tipping fee was $1.95 per cubic yard when
they were last surveyed. The tipping fee at the City of Denton Landfill Is
$2.72 per cubic yard.
The committee feels that if the City coinrclal system was sold and an exclu-
sive franchise was granted that rates could escalate to a point comparable with
charges elsewhere in the area.
'i With regard to privatization, Texas Waste Management and Brown Ferris Indus-
tries made presentations to the committee. The typical contract length Is a J
five-year minimum with several five-year options. Rates are tied to the 1
Consumer Price Index and are not at a fixed rate for the length of the con-
tract.
%I The committee feels that the tong-term interests of the citizens and the
com+>arclal customers will be served best by preserving the City-operated solid
waste collection system as the exclusive service provider.
I ~
1
15T25I09331/5 '
i
F IWO
SURVEY
I~
1
I l
i
I
i
!Ij
~J
f
1ST2S109338/4
or *-W 7
T
OCTOBER 1988 SOLID HASTE SURVEY OF COMMERCIAL d RESIDENTIAL SERVICE
1`404RS
gRRD!LTOu 0W..N FO" WOSTIi ,AAtFriD RVINB LVAISVILLE MCKINNET PLA40 11CI1
imalmlili Service A A D A A 9 B A
npathiy Charge 7.51 None 6.35 7.50 9.25 7,07 4.40 6.25 7
ND. of Households 23,000 7,700 126,000 52,284 27.992 91681 4,800 3301 22
Service Frequency VA"tk Moot moth 2XAvfe1 2%/0111 2X/wttl 2X/wtek 2X/w114 2XA
` Service MslhOd Begs Paper Bags eggs or throe Sags Begs--psper Bags 84ps Bogs B
away toataiaers or plastic or cut
free Bags zvyear 2X/yesr No No No No No wytu
818get 848,000 146,995 12,1151599 21015,114 3.636,739 - - 31885,484 1.90 {
Seeoral Fund Subsidy art below 146.995 No Yet 538,735 No
I
general Food Transfer No No No No No T4 of Remus See i
I~ 0t~er Ser:iu: No 'Ns its No No No Na No R.i
Ssecial Collectioo net below IXAatk IX/oonth IX/m1k Set below 2XAeeek Call-in See below IXN
Special Charge No No NO No No No $23 per 1/2 hr d4/cv yd r i
110 NfiaUua I
Disposal Facility Nblic Public Public Public Public Public Public Prtvale Prig
i
Nw of Facility Carrollton Caelol Southeast OWaad Monier Ferrtlt TX Waste Mckinnty NT Municipal NT Mot
j Landfill Landfill Lan64111 M049emal landfill 4110 Dist. Water
Cowarcisl Service E E E E E 8 1 8 f
Franchise Fee Not Not Mont Hoot Not 2% of come- 4',4 of Rfftnut Set below ft
dal receipts
Disposal Facility Mwsicipat Municipal Municipal Municipal Municipal Private Municipal Private Felt
Nam at Facility Carrollton C mlot Sosthesst 8ulood Hunter Ferrell TX waste MCkinnn NT Municipal NT Mvp
ludfltl Landfill Laudfill Muaoemot Landfill Water 01611. Water
i
lKS1DENTIAL SERVICE vCdtfERCIAL SERVICE
A. Municipal collettioo A. Municipal Collection
8. Private contractor B. Private contractor with 41ciltive Iranchiu
C. Private contractors with assigned territories C. Private contractors with usigotd territorial
D. Municipal d private with assigned territories 0. Municipal ! private with assigned territories
E. Mwicipal h pNvatav no assigatd territories, ,
of esclusUe franchise
:1'
4 '
t
I
i Carrollton --SPECIAL COLLECTIONS-- Brush ~s oicced uo on a call-im oasis. They have one man and one trucs dssignttsd
for brash piteua. Curreslly it averages around 2 days a welt. Other tines daring the seer it is more often.
Acoliantes and furniture are oicned up on the regular routes ay the regular crews.
--5iNERAL FM WEISlh1'-- They are mat in enterprise ivnn 'her are asst of the oirrrril 4Pn4. No. rear t87-981
solid waste operations cane in below budget.
Farmers Branch --OTHER SERVICES-- Valley View Citizens Transfer Site. Citizens nn use 2 IOyd 00111 tool at this site.
Fort north --D7KA SERVICES-- Illegal dump Iitoe.
--CRIIERCIAL SERVICE--The city collects same tomertral, but mostly their commercial collection consists
of other city operations' waste.
Irving --SPECIAL CMUCTIM-- One collection each 10.11 calendar days.
Call-in is not necessary or reloired.
PTino --SPECIAL COLLECTIM-- The Median and Right-of-Uay Divislos handles special collections.
--F;WOISE FEE-- 41X of gross receipts frill accounts where cmttts"t is using an g cu. Yd. container or less.
M of gross receipts from accounts where customer Is using 20. 30 or 42 cu. Yd. container.
Richardson --OBf K FIND TIf WU- Residential Solid Yule is fist as enterprise food. It is a sort of the general fund.
I
p
I
I i I
i
i
1
J
III
!r
I
V
7CTOSER 1900 SOLID WASTE SI1iVEY OF COM!fERCIAL 6 RESIDENTIAL SERVICE
ARLIN61M BAYILW 11EAUtOrfT BELLA14 CiALY1:00N MESOU17E :RA40E SNEoM* 'EMPLE TYLER
Rosidoat it Service B A A A A 4 A A A A
Monthly Charge 4.50 9.50 10.89 12.00 11,75 6.75 11,00 4,00 5.75 1.25
No. of Households 63,000 1111000 33,000 6.000 20,000 30,000 51000 10.000 14,000 21.203
Service Frequency Meek Meek Meek Meek 2Xheok Mail Meek 2Xheek Meek Meek
Servict Method gigs lags Animated Begs Begs Bags BIOS Bags BIOS Begs
r -1 V cast or cans or cans or call or cams or cans or cans
r
E Fete Bags No No See below 3Xhear 40 No No No No No
Budget 1,114,001 3,997,840 901,000 2,703,476 1,700,000 370,000 See below 1,504,041 Set bola
Gootral Fund Suboidy - 52,000 Na 739,721 No Yes No See below No No
Gtooral Fuod Transfer No 200,000 No 475,000 No Set beta None 1399211 Ste below
I
Other Services - No See below No Soo below No No Nn Set below No
Special tolloctice Want Meek SXhook Wooek Set below IXheek lXhatk Ste below 1XheeK UlhesK
l Special Charge No No No No No No No See below so No
I
i
i F Disposal Fuility Public Private Politic Public Pool I( Pvblic Public Public Pubtfc Private
Nine of Ficilltr Arlington Naaelwood Beavewl Beltairt gulf Coast Mes4vilo Orrogt Ca. liT1Yt Tenolt La;dlow
Landfill Landfill Landfill Transfer Landfill Landfill See below Landfill
Site
Commercial Service 0 Soo below Ste below See below Ste below A Set below Su below See below E
Franchise Fee $to below None 2 04 gros None None None V 04 gross se 04 gross V, 04 gross None
receipts rtcaiols receipts tceiplt
Soe below.
Disposal Facility Municipal Private Municipal Private Private Muolcipii Municipal Private Municipal Private
Nw of Facility Arlington Huelwood Banat BFI BFI tlestvito Or.-oge Co. Lee It Sons Tenlt William
Landfill Landfall A 2 others Alvin Landfill Landfill Landfill
#RESIDENTIAL SERVICE *COMMERCIAL SERVICE
A. Municipal collection A. Municipal Collection
8. Private contractor B. Private contractor with e:civtive Iran
C. Peivete contractors with assigned territorial C. Private contractors wick assigned lire
0. Municipal i private with assigned territories 0. Municipal i private with assigned test
1. Meeicipl 0 ptivatt, no assigned terra
no escivsive 4rnncklte
i
l
Arlington --=WWCRiSE fEE-- The city rfceivel 19,24 cents Der rtsidentil custmer billed by the city is in idninislritiue cr
Tht contractor pays the city 15,75 per ton for every ton oisoosed 04 in the City 114104111,
3iytaut -4ESIONTIAL RATE-- 19.50 is tic mont0v Potr, ?},Ire it . senicr ciOlors rave of SG.i~, J
1
--COiMERCIAL SERVICE-- private contractors. no assigned territories.
Beaumont -4ESIDEMIAL SERVICE-- They are converting to in autaeittd lysten, 'wo thirds of the city is converted. Thl felt 1111
1/3 will be converted by Dec"r.• City Provides residents with the containers for this systro. I
-PHEA SERVICES-- Cleu cmn++ity frogral, landfill
--SPECIALS-- Cali it basis, Dmirtment will tick it up within 10 days, Beawolt onployets I6 people who wort eaclu
picking up special/ 5 days a will.
--CM KIAL SERVICE-- 4 private cpntractorl, non-wiustue franchise agreele+ts. The city services a few small be
residelti+lly.
Bellaire --61NE141L FM 5t11S171-- Out of the Utility Fund.
Bellaire --CtfMlk SERVICE-- BFI, Waste Manlgmtak and several other individual orivit+ hitters. No assigned terrttorits
no f lochises,
Gilveston --4711" KP.%ts - Sireel srewf+Dq and lithe crew,
--SPECIALS-- 8rvsh is picked vp M/week. The litter crew picas up appliances and other large itm at 1 call to b
5 dart 1 wool.
--Ct1MIAL SERVICE-- They currently haul private contractors without assigned tarritorttl or franchises, Howtvt
are Wkltg on goliq to a franchise uraoilmot.
i
Orahge --i9UW-- Techkiully, Solid haste is not a separate fund fern the gtnteii fund.
r
--COfMERCIAL Kill Municipal and private, no assigned tirrttoriet, non-ncivttut franchise agreemits.
Shemin --NW- Sol Id Waste is a out of the geetral fond. 50x of operations paid by general fund, t11% paid by fees char
residoetial cvstoollem.
--SPECIALS-- Moor the city provides a city-wide fret collection of brush, large, itels, and vntsvat ucwulations.
post of the year it It do+t on 1 call in basis. Prices range 4ra1 sal to 185,
-GTUA-- &eatir Tndu Municipal Utility District La l
--COi IAL SERVICE-- City provides eawereill collection of begs and cardboard bores. Net are 3 private haulers
Provide dal l service, no assigned toreltories, non-ewcill Uahchists.
i
Temple -Ui>IEA 4f3N1tE5•- Ludfill, welding shop, street sweeping.
--COMEACIAL SERVICES-- City provides to to 4 cu. Yd. dmpsters. Private Wavier provides 6 8 6 cu. A. dweNers and
off co+taiatrs. Noe-tacleu franthist. U;ie1 the contract is up, the franchise Ut will be raised frail 3% to V. of gr
receipts.
I
Tyler --BUDGET-- Residestial and coenercial is one budget. Total budget is 12.1 mill ion. Conucial reurnut thisyeu, 1671
Conowrcill fefteut this year, 15111501. They transfer /21111,111 to the gtllral food for vehicle 461091110, 11115 yet
they 011641nd 1271,101 to the gelfeal fold to start a t ollo 1. Meortizatip+ fund.
i
14
IUW
x
i
1
x
RATE COMPARISON
{
I
ff ~
1
1
JI
1
I
IST2S109338/5
-F WNW
i
S
p d d e O cf
O A p O d e
r I (n O d~~~ 1 I 1 1 1 I
V~ 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1
3~~ ' ~ I I~! 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
ry M c0
r. 216
w O r I N u+ fA M e w l I t M w r P N I
W~ o~c ~ I I I I I I I I
I P g P c ca o a P o
0o e o r P y~ e e o l n
W ~ N aND ~ iN'f d I~~~ mw N
IIIIII IIIIII I
g IcZ;R fV O In+ano NiOT
WJ N ym : 1p+ N b ym1/~ d
~ Jr ~hON~ m I= S I I I M ~'•+NNn
gad IIIIII
I ~ a P e e o o
1 O g q e q o P e O 0
O C! N pN Of
r ~ ~O w0+~ N I timnNP ~
S~~ I11III ISI11I I wNN~'l
w ~ 1
a
O O O O P O O O d e 0 0
~1 e e 0 0 0 g P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N ~ Yf O O^ o O m O poi p oi p O. o O op O. V m e ~-1 V Y7 R
I A ~/+Owf O Ff O T ~~P ~n MN ~ C`~ry-1NN
K I M w .r .r
a
IQ S! vt P
' A ~ .Nn .~-1 N N
s OC IIIIII I IIIIII IIIIII
P P P C g P
P P e e 0 O p O e o o O O O 0 0
p, ~R~al1 ~ gOp000 eP~^a1 yO
i' P aL ~ x ~ S+ N Yf' ~ ~ ~ .w.l i .N+ N M P N N
IIIIII rww
p ~Nypp~y ~yOm ~y -I aSyNYP1~
f7 O^ O~ SX o C9 N 1' h t+i N o Fm
f n Nn
y~ m r+ m a~ p~ 1~ m 1/~ n nV-.
IQ Vsr, M~xnbf ^ MYnA ~ M M N
P o e g e e
e Y! O V? p q O On O I ds O
N _ ry M oNiVi
era I I I I I I i I I I I I I ~°.wN
ooeoed
p p e e e o
N WW Y 1 v a~ a'1 Y I
v~ M ~~~T r~ 1 1 S 1 M m r ~f~ ~ I I i S I 1
i ~ M I I I 1 1
y y s yyi~ ae as
y y ` ~}{S~J¢!' Y CJj S V r Y.wgJ, e' e Q ~1 r r
p ~ w N M O Y7 O r N M V Ifs O
.+ry M TIlfN rryM THb
f
0~ low
1
y
4
COMMERCIAL RATE SURVEY
Open Open
Pvt/fit Open FARMERS FORT Open open Pet/E1, Mon PYUEXC Mon
CONTAINER ARLINGTON CARROLLTON OENTON BRANCH WORTH 6ARLIWD IRVING LEWISVILLE MESQUITE PLANO RICMRDSCN
'88 Rates '08 Rates Mu 19 '08 Rates '08 Retes 188 Rates 188 Rates '08 Rites 188 Riles '118 Rites '88 Rates
2rd
IOsnp/W/tk $34.00 111.46 !34.00 $22.28
2 mpmetk R.00 25.36 61.00 - 34.0) -
3 DAPN#ek 7N.00 38.94 07.90 -
4 DapAktk 9E.00 48.72 - 11410 I
5 OM?Jtek 1211,00 66.90 141.00 -
6 Dusp/Yeek 159.00 71.52 168.00 - -
3id
DonpMtik - 124.19 $45.00 30.01 '146171 26.13
2 DunpNltk - 51.00 38.04 79.00 03.25 68 00 76.75 52.25
3 Ousp/Week 76.50 54,111 90,00 1200 99.00 101.61 -78.38 _
4 DuspNeek 102.00 71.52 129.00 166.50 129.00 121.70 -
5 Ousp/Wod 127.50 89.40 150.00 200.15 160.00 157.22
6 Dunp/Wtek 153.60 107.28 100.00 249.75 190.00 186.08
44
1 mp/Wetk 15'.00 $25.36 $50.00 142.90 $41.74 135.00
2 Donp"Wilk 82.00 48.72 30.40 76.00 :09.00 $5.00 69.69 60,00
3 DuapNtlk 112.00 71.52 110,50 110100 164.00 82.00 104.56 103.00
4 Omp/U1ek 143.09 95,36 140.00 144.00 218.00 110.00 137.00
5 OAPNelk 17:.00 119.20 170.00 178 00 273.00 137.50 172.OD
6 Dunp/Week 229.00 143.04 210.00 212.00 327.00 165.00 20.00
drd
1 Domp/lieek $51.00 $38.04 $60.00 150,08 $76.75 152.25
2 Dun1N=11 102.00 71.52 99.00 ^I.9D 12140 120.33 13.50 104.56
3 DonpNeer 153.60 10.28 133,00 - 133,06 181.00 167.04 113.09 143.33 -
4 Dimp.Lleek 204.00 14334 170.00 174.00 242.00 216.28 151.00 191.13
5 DunpN+ek 255.60 177.30 21C.00 215 08 302.00 259.67 109.00 238.92
d D+ep/Utd 306.00 212.76 25C.00 25708 363.00 306.42 226.50
f
i
.i W
! l r.
4
L 'OICZRCIAL RATE SOR P
Open Open
PuUEee Open FARMERS FORT Open Open Put/Eac Nun Pvt/Eac M+,n
CONTAINER ARLINOICS CARROLLTON DENTCr+ BRANCH WORTH BARIAND IRVINE LEWI%ILLE MESGJITE PIANO Ric'4AAOSON
'8I Rates 'BB Fitts Mir 'B9 '88 Petal 'II Rates 'II Rates '011011 'BB Riles Be 'Rates is Rates 'BI pales
.
Ird
j 1 Dmp/wtek 482.00 $48,72 $70.00 $06.73 69,69 f68.00
I1MpAkik 130.10 136.01 95.34 115,00 133.10 144.33 96.00 127.44 137.00
3 Doo/week 149,00 204.06 143.04 15000 199.00 205.70 14350 191.13 20300
4 0004111 2041 272.00 119.12 19000 245.00 265.47 191.50 254.67 • 274.00
5 owpMetk 274.10 340.00 234.40 230.00 - 332.00 344.69 239.50 270.01 343.00
4 MFPJIek 348.40 283.6I 259.00 398.00 384.19 287.50 412.00
IN
1 DunpA4tek
2 oulfNev:
3 Owp/Wcik
i DopNeek -
' I
all
.awr
T
A r
1919+19,
i
MERSIAL RATE SURvEr I
Open Open Open Open Pvt/Eae Mn-up to 4yd J)
COMAINEA BAYTpl4 BFA111afT B£IIAIRE 6hlVESiON I1Ckt/F Opts Open Open-11rd d up open
Own RdgM T
'BB . Rate$ '88 . Rales 'Be . pilot '80 . Rites 'Be Rates Be 'Rites '8S8 Fetes 'Be eW TYLER
.
.
. es '89 Rates
1 DusRMeek
2yd
BFl w:old 141 10 fafarieitlDe
2 D+NNe+k not r.ltase - $1,51 to $171,44 lofDrautfon
11,00 not awl 11.91 per $2240 134;00
3 O".41eek rite 101.00 able ffm cubic yard, rot 19all-
4 Ouottir Wormalion. 130,10 the city. 41,60 able frog - 35,00 44,04 '
5 OumpNeek 113.00 $4.40 the city.
6 Dw0/Uaek 1111.00 4840 111160
3rd
I Owplkeek BFl rwld 44,00 lnfornatioo $1,51 to $38,00 110,40 ieforsation
1 OvApNeek not release 18.00 not 19411- 11.11 per 55.00 40,80 not evil:- $33
2.00 1 4.00
3 MOW rate 110,00 able fras cubic yard. 52,01 74.00 ~
4 094ph'aik infarreatirn. 140.00 the city. 71,00 111.10 able iron 72,09 74.10 ~
5 Ompv.ak 1711,00 90,00 81,60 the rift, 92,00
d DunpNUk 211,00 147,OD 102,00
112,10
41d
I DOOeaa IN woald 148,10 Infarnatlon 11,51 to
1 MOW net fataa,e 85.00 not avall- 11,91 per 70$42,00 f 4.0 I not avolan (14,00 41.00 f
3 OuipNeek rate ,00 54,14 mat avail- 10,00 14.00 00 ab 4 Owprueek r fornatirn. 140.00 Iblecttm ruble yard, 92,00 11.40 able iron
94.00 90.10
S D"rp/Week 180.00 111,00 113,80 the eJty, 122,110
d Ounp/4eag 140.00 136.00 134,70
163, t0 1
Id
I Owmp/Woee ON wcutd $52.00 Information $1,51 to
2 0004e11 not releice 95.00 not awil- $1.01 per lefarnallon $55,00 154,00
3 DumpNeek rile 133,00 ibis from cubic Yard. rat Buell 87,00 88.00
1 Owpr'deek iniersatian, 180.00 the clty. .511 fine 120.00 122.00
S OunOnlnk 210.00 'he city. 112.08 154,00
I Oamp~tlaek 288.00 „ 164.00 190.00
115,00 224.00
i
i 1
yyyEE r,
.
. Q n
1~I
CNIERCIAL RAZE SURVEY
Mon-op to 4yd
Open Oleo Open open pvt/Eac open Open open+d I up Open
04TR.M9 EMIM BEAU1ONT BELLAIRE GALVESTON MCOIMIEY OPME SHER" TWLE TYLER
'88 Rates 'BB Rates 168 Rates 18 Rates 811 Rites 188 Rites 188 Rites Be Rates 168 Rates
I Duap/Yeak 9I would 160.00 Infariaetlon $1.51 1a Ieforsatldn 068.00 169100
i Dog/Week
2 MO/Wilt lot releast 110.00 not avail- 11,91 per not Ivatl- 113.00 108.00
3 DunpNeek fete 170.00 able '•m cubic yard. able Iron 176.00 117.90
1 DunpNtok Isformilm, 200.00 the city. Ike city. 2DO.00 106.00
5 DwpNeek 266.00 - 215.90 225.00
d DAPNIek 310.00 270.00 261.00
f 1076
information 185.09
I Dunp/Ueek BFI could 1)l100 information 11.51 to
2 Dunp/Wiek not r-ileas- 130.00 not avail- 11.91 par hot avail- 132.90
3 00011% rata 195.00 able frm cubic yard. able fro 179.00
1 DopNak infornatich. 258.00 ibe city. tba city. 226.00
S DopNeek 322100 273.00
d DunpNeek 387.00 320.00
v
r
4
LEWISVILLE Texas Waste will be raising rates effective November I, I989.
Lewsiville has not received a proposal from TX Waste yet on the amount.
BEAUMONT They currently have non-exclusive franchise u4ieements ejitn 4
private companies. The above rates are the maximum wnsch these companies
can charge. hawever, they may charge less,
BELLAIRE They have 6FI, Waste Management and several other private
haulers in town.
..SHERMAN There are 3 private haulers in town. 1
TEMPLE City provides 2, 31 4 cubic yd. dumpsters. Private hauler provide rl
6 and 9 cubic yard dumpsters and roll off containers,
I
V
I, N
~ J
i
I
I
j 1
I
i
' j
I
i
i j
I
LJ
I
T-W
i,
ROLLCFF RATE COMPARISON
DELIVERY MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE
fCC RENTAL FEE 5Cn rULL
'r'r YARD CFEN rOF
Denton
Carrollton 39.~3 Q4.80
Farmers Branch None ?ir,p(r 5.4r.r
Fort Worth
Garland
Irving
Lewisville 124vo OT) 37.78
McKinney lr?4.64 130.76 ~
Plano
1 Richardson 35.00 180.00 130.00
Arlington 115vd 071 None 90.00 :39.00
Baytown 29.00 57.00 52.00
Beaumont BFI would not release rate information,
Bellaire Information
Galveston not •.,tatIabI from the city.
Information no. available from the city.
Mesouite 30.00 73,00
Orange 46.00
SMermdn Information not available from the city.
Temple Duna 55.00 Y60+l14LmPing Feel
Tyler None 65.00
110.Oi1 .
I 30 YARD OPEN TOP f
Denton 50.00 52.50 2.2
Carrollton 14. ~0
Farmers Branch Nona 50'00 125,00
Fort Worth see eNPlanutSon below 125.00
Garland
Irving
Lewisville 37.78 104.64
McKinney 163.45
Plano
Richardson 35.00 180.00 130.00
Arlington None 108.00 59.00
Baytown 29.00 102.00 66.00
Beaumont BFI would not release rate Information.
63.0
Bellaire Information not availablelf
rom`rthe city.
Galveston Information not available from the city,
fiesquIte 30.00 -75.00
Orange 60.00
I Sharman
~
Temple Information not available from the city.
Tyler NNone one .55.00 5t0HfDunPilly real
73.00 125.00
i
I
I
r
1
F low
s ,
M 6
~%DLLOFF RAZE COMPARISON
UEL I VERY 'ICNTHL f 3ERVI CE ':HARGE
FEE RENTAL FEE: PER FULL
4p YARD OPEN TOP
ilentcn 50,00 157. 715 189.b0
Carrollton
None 5 1:1,q4 1g,O0
Farmers Branch see explanation telow 1^^<5.00
Fort Worth
13arl and
Irving
Lewisville
`lcKinnev
F Plano Richardson (42 vd OT) None 108.00 83.00
Arlington 29,00 124,01) 80.1;10
Baytown BFI would not release rate information.
Beaumont
Bellaire information not available from the city.
Mesauiten Information not available from the city.
u'rdnge
Shersan information not available from the city,
Temple None 70.00 360+(Dumping Fee)
Tyler None 80.00 1°0.00
20 YARD COMPACTOR ~
Denton 50.00 115.50 94.80
Carrollton
Farmers branch see explanation below 121,00
Fort Worth
Garland
Irving
Lewisville (24 yd comp)
Business owns comp. head 37.78 183.39
Wet Mgt owns head & bor. 37.78 396.00 175,,12
McKinney
Piano
Richardson None ;43.00 69.00
Arlington
Baytown BFI would not release rate information.
Bellaire Information not available from the city.
I Galveston Information not available from the city. l
Mesquitr
Orange
Sherman Information not available from the city.
Temple In4c-mation not available from the city.
I Tyler See below
110.00 J
1
F
a I
1
ROLLOFF RATE COMPARISON
DELIVERY MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE r
FEE RENTAL FEL PER PULL
30 YARD COMPACTOR
A
Penton `0.00 157.°0 142 . 0
Carrollton
Farmers Branch
Fort Worth
Garland
Irving
Lewisville
Business owns compt head 37.78 183.39 176.12
i~ Wst Mat owns head & box 37.78 396.00 -175.12
McKinney None None 110.00 i100 Deposit
f Plano
Richardson None 343.00 103.00
Arlington 29.00 102.00 76.00
Baytown BFI would net release rate information.
Beaumont
Bellaire Information net available from the city.
I Galveston Information not AVAilable from the city.
Mesquite
Orange
Sherman Information not available from the city. `
Temple Information not available from the city.
Tyler See be kiw 125.00
i
I '
42 YARD COMPACTOR
Denton 50.00 176.40 199.08
Carrollton (40yd compactor) None 150.00 159.00
Farmers Branch
Fort Worth
Gerland
Irving
Lewisville
Business owns comp. head 37.78 183.39 175.12
Wst Mgt owns head & box 37.78 396.00 175.12
McKinney None None 189.90 $100 Deposit
Plano 35.00 180.00 147.00
Richardson None 343.00 144.00
Arlington 29.00 202.00 --91.00
Baytown 8FI would not release rate information.
j Beaumont
D&I I ail rd information not available from the city.
Galveston Information not available from the city.
Mesquite 30.00 110.00 84.00
1 Orange
Sherman Information not available from the city.
Temple Information not available from the city.
Tyler See below 150.00
I
a~
FARMERS BRANCH They do not prorate the monthly rental fee. For 30vd
and 40yd open tops, if a business has the container for 1 to 14 days,
the charge is 150. From 15 to 30 davs thr charge is 1100. For 15yd and
.Ovd compactors. if a business has the container for 1 to 14,davs, the
charge is 140. From 15 to 30 days, the charge is 150,
TEMPLE Clumping Fee is 11.03 multiplied by the landfill charge.
TYLER Rent for each indiVidual compactor is the cost of the
equipment divided by 36 months.
DE14TON Charges a one time delivery fee of $50 to new customers
for roll-off service. The City typically owns both the stationary
compactor and the box. If the City does not own the compactor, {
only the service charge applies.
{
j
V
J
I
Ir
f
RI
`v
t
TEXAS WASTE MANAGEMENT
RATE SCHEDULE
FOR DENTON I
i
l
f
i
1ST2S109338/6
k
a
A Wtste Mtnagemenl COrrC
NOV
DENTON RATE SCHEDULE
1
COMMERCIAL
Frequency- 3yd 4y-d 6yd_ syd--
1 3 22.80 3 23.36 $ 33.60 s 44.80
Qgo, 2 33.60 44.80 65.76 87.68
/ 1,otz~ 3 50.40 65.76 96.64 131.52
Q /4 65.76 87.68 13152 174.08
5 82.20 109.60 163.20 217.60
6 98.64 131.25 195.84 261.12
I
FOR MUTILPLE DUMPSTERS
-Cubic Yds Collecter Per Month Rate Per Yard
1- 12 $ 1.90
13- 20 1.45
21- 40 1.28
41-200 1.21
C~,yefa,C ry14rof 201-400 1.15
401-500 1.12
1 501.600 s.09
601-700 1.08
701-800 1.05
801- Up 1.01
1
1
1
i
i
TEXAS WASTE MANAGEMENT -
CITY OF DENTON
RATC COMPARISON
f +i+
I i
I +
i
i
i
r
i
I
1ST2$109338/7
I
T-9 low
f
y
Texas Waste Mananenent Rites Prinr it 4-1549
City of Denton Rates 4-148 to 2.20.89
or0 9yd
F~eauencr Ilk TWr .~....CITl T4t1 CIT'•'_..
22,80 22.80 1 23.36 23.36 . --33.60 35.04. 44,90 44,80
33.66 3541 1 41,80 44,90: 55.76 65,76 87,68 97,68
z 5:,40 .40 61.76 65.76 99,84 98.651 !31.52 13L52
65,76 63.76 87.68 87.68 :31,52 131.2: :74,08 174,08
82.90: 92.20 !59.61: !09.6C• '3.20 163.20 117.63 217.60
98.64 98.14: 13I.: :11,52: :95,94 195.81 . 261.12 261,12
1
~k
71%11 .41ta Isdaoeoent Rates Effective 1.15,99
City 04 0•ntna esteq E44ective 3-1-89
I
6yd
3rd Ird r TQM CITY Til4 CITY m CITY
Fnelualcy Tk4 Ct'Y
24,85 24.64 t 25.16 25.36 i 36.62 36.01 i oy.57 95.16
3 36.62 38.04 ~ 48.83 x9.,72. ,.60 71.52 .
E 1 51.94 51,811 11.60 71.52. 107.52 107,20 143.36 143.04
4 71.68 71.521 95.57 95.361 143.34 M.041 189,75 109.12
5 09.60 99,401 119,44 119.201 177.09 177.301 237.10 236.40
6 107,52 107.281 143.06 143.041 213.47 212.761 204.62 283.68
i
I
i
t
190
1
I
I
I
1 b
SURVEY OF CHARGES
I
March 30, 1989
CITY
I RATE
CURRENT TX PRIOR
SERVICE WST TO CURRENT
PROVIDER SERVICE LEVEL MGT 3/1/89 CITY
TX WST Mar Greenway Plaza -
Tony Raposa 2/3 yd 2x ; 31.68 ; 65.76 ; 71.52
City Cust. Varsity Bowl 1/8 yd 2x 115.50 87.68 95.36
City Cust. Singing Oaks Apts. 8/3 yd 3x 397.18 380.16 413.28 ,
City Cust. Lens Del Rey 6/6 yd 3x 498.00 544.32 592.92
i
TX WST MGT Town 6 Country 1/6 yd 2x 67.41 65.76 71.52
TX WST Mcr Genre Gohlke 1/4 yd lx 24.21 23.36 25.36
TX WST Mar So. Dentan Animal
Hospital 113 yd 3x 48.00 SG.40 54.81
I
I ~
CITY
RATE
l TX PRIOR
WST TV CURRENT
SERVICE LEVEL MGT 3/1!89 CITY
Prices quoted to local business 1/3 yd Ix ; 21.80 ; 22.80 $ 24.69
over the phone.
(They do not have 2 yards.) 1/3 yd 2x 33.60 35.04 38.04
1/4 yd 1x 23.36 23.36 25.36
1/4 yd 2x 44.80 44.80 48.72
This business was told that Tx WST MQr asked for a one-year camitment.
Prices quoted on a 30 yd open tog in tewisvilles
Delivery and setup ; 39.03
Rent 3.50/day (30 days - 1105)
Per empty 168.84
+a h +
y .`f
1
4
WHAT THE CITY CHARGES
f
IST25109338/8
RATES FOR SINGLE DUMPSTERS - 1989-90
EFFECTIVE 10/1/89
2 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS
SERVICE PER WEEK RATE PER 30 DAY PERIOD
1 S 16.50
2 25.44
3 38.16
4 48.88
5 61.10
6 71.76
3 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS
1 S 24.75
2 38.16
3 54.99
4 71.76
5 89.70
6 107.64
4 CUBIC YARD CONTATW.Rq
I
i 1 5 25.44
2 48.88
3 71.76
4
95.68
{ 55 119.60
143.52
6 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS
1 $ 38.16
2 71.76
4 107.64
5
143.52
5 177.91 1
213.48 1
8 CUBIC YARD CONTAINERS
1 I
2 S 48.88
95.68
33 143.52
189.76
55 237.20 1
284.64
~ J
I
1ST2S99315
Revised 10/1/89
4
I A
1
CITY OF DENTON
COMMERCIAL DUMPSTER RATES
1989-90
i
CUBIC YARDS COLLECTED RATE
PER WEEK PER 30 DAYS
1 - 3 '5.25
4 - 6 6.36
7 - 10 5.11
11 - 25 5.98
26 - 50 5.93
51 - 100 5.76
r~ 101 - 125 5.51
126 - 150 5.42
151 - 175 5.16
` 176 or more 4.99
f
The following mthod Is used to determine the charge:
a
{ N of Yards Charge
DPx pater Services Collected Per
M Du ater x Size x Per Week - Per Week x Rate = 30 Days
i
Exam le 1:
1 x 3 x 3 = 9 x 56.11 = S 54.99 i
x~a Example
3 x 3 x 2 = 18 J
1 x 2 x 3 6
24 x $5.98 = $143.52
'e Customer has one 3 cubic yard sized dunpster picked up 3 times per week.
1 ^r Customer has three 3 cubic yard sized durpsters picked up 2 times per week
J and has one 2 cubic yard sized durpster picked up 3 Limes per week.
II
i
r
1ST2S993I8 (Rev. 10/1189)
i
-1 I
c:a
CUMERCIAL "ROLL-OrF" RATES
1999-9n
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 10 1989
A $50.00 delivery fee is to be charged to all new cust,orners.
OPEN TOP RENT COST
CONTAINERS !ER 30 DAYS PER PULL
i
20 cu. yd. S 39.53 S 94.40
30 cu. yd. 52.50 144.60
40 cu. yd. 57.75 192.80
RENr COST
COMPACTORS PER 30 DAYS PER PULL
E f
12 cu. yd. S 87.15 S 57.84
15 cu. yd. 89.25 72.30
f 20 cu. yd. 115.50 96.40
25 cu, yd. 115.50 120.50
30 cu. yd. 157.50 144.60
42 cu. yd. 176.40 202.44
(Cost per pull = 54.82 x c/y size)
1S12S99316 (Rev. 10/1/89)
Y
11rr
I a
~Yj4•
P
1
I
` FISCAL IMPACT
OF
ALTERNATIVES
i
I
i
I
1ST25109338/9
E
II
S
U
STATUS QUO
EXPENSES
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OTHER
0 6 M $1,255,349 $ 762,756 S
DEBT RETIREMENT 47.0867 104,422
BAD DEBT 10,000 100000
DEBT SERVICE 500477 110,437
ADM. TRANSFER 215,311 116,629
DISPOSAL COST 156,104 _ 343,106 243,763
$1,135,108 $10447,350 $ 243,763
I
GRAND TOTAL EXPENSE $3,4260221
1
!i REVENUE
RESIDENTIAL $11695,909
r COMMERCIAL 1,375,304
DISPOSAL 243,763
TOTAL REVENUE $3,3140976
fF
J
SHORTAGE 0 111,245)
RATE INCREASE NEEDED
RESIDENTIAL + $.20 PER MONTH
j DIMPSTER + 6 PER YARD
$ROLL-OFF + 5.40 FER YARD
I i
IST2WI09346/8
J
_777
i
ASSUME ROLL-OFF ON JANUARY 1, 1990
ASSUME SIDE-LOAD ON MARCH 1, 1990
FY.PENSES
RESIDENTIAL CCWERCIAL OTHER
0 6 M $1,255,,349 S 762,756 $
DEBT RETIREMENT 47,867 1040422
BAD 'DEBT 100000 100000
DEBT SERVICE 50,477 110,437
ADM, TRANSFER 215,311 1160629
i DISPOSAL COST 156,104 343,106 243,763
$1,7350108 $1,447,350 $ 243,763
i ASSUME ROLL-OFF 50,114
ASSIMF. SIDF-t OAD 26,516
$1,523,980
I f
~ I
GRAND TOTAL E<PENSE $3,5010851
i
i
i
REVENUE
RESIDENTIAL $1,695,909
COMMERCIAL 1,375,304
Ih DISPOSAL _ 243,763
f SUB-TOTAL REVENUE $3,3I4,976
f
i
ASSUME ROLL.-OFF 68,312
i
ASSUME SIDE-LOAD 116,415
TOTAL REVENUE $30499,703
SHORTAGE 3,148)
1ST2W109346/9
J
:i
o
Y
FI
TITLE: ASSUME ALL ROLL-OFF SERVICE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1990.
EXPENDITURE DETAIL:,
ACCOUNT N ACCOUNT TITLE REQUESTED
8041 OVERTIME $ 20000
8502 SPECIAL SERVICES 10500
8507 MOTOR POOL LEASES 46,614 1
TOTAL REQUEST $500114
1
C CHANGES EXPECTED IN PERFORMANCE MEASURES: {
WORKER YEARS NO CHANGE
CUBIC YARDS DISPOSED +130312
J
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
j This package is for assunptlon of all roll-off services. The Connercial unit
i can provide service with no additional staff or vehicles although some overtime
Is likely to be Incurred and a contractor may be necessary to help with the
Installation of the units. Lease payments are for three (3) years for
7-42 bard compactors, 4-30 yard self-contained compactors, 1-20 yard 1
self-contained compactor and 13-30 yard open tops.
ACCOUNT k ACCOUNT TITLE AMOUNT
6402 COMMERCIAL FEES $68,312 1
9 ACCOUNT N CATEGORY YEAR 2 YEAR
PERSONAL SERVICES $ 10500 $ 10500
SERVICES 66,820 660820
6402 COMMERCIAL FEES 910084 91,084
1ST2S109337/1
low
tiw
wx
i
h
I
TITLE: ASSUME ALL SIDE-LOAD REFUSE COLLECTION EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 1990
i EXPENDITURE DETAIL:
RE STED
ACCOUNT N ACCOUNT TITLE
8021 SERVICE/MAINTENANCE SALARY $10,429
8061 FICA 7-''
8062 TMRS 602 i
8064 WORKMANS COMP 771
8065 INSURANCE 1,616
I i
8108 UNIFORMS 150
8121 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 30
8507 MOTOR POOL LFASES 12,135
TOTAL REQUEST $26,516
E i
i
I I
CHFVNGES EXPECTED IN PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
WORKER YEARS +0.5
+9 493
CUBIC YARDS DISPOSED
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
l To aesune all side-load refuse collection, an additional driver is needed along
with a new side-load truck, the new truck Is included in the current budget.
Cortmerclal revenue is expected to Increase by $232,830 per year or $116,415 In
the first six rrnths. Irplementatlon Is asstr,ed to be March 1, 1990.
I
II
f
IST2$109337/2
$ gili
ACS y ACCOt NT TI TLE
64n9 COMERCIA1. MOUNT
ffFC !13l G r~~'NrTl15)
5176,414
ACCOUNT p CATEGORY
UA 2 Ytl1R 3
PERSONAL SERVICES
SUPPLIES 5 23,431 $ 240536
MAINTENANCE 30629 31629
SERVICES I00000 15,000
6402 COf?4ERCIAL FEES 50,516 50,515
1 232,830 232,830
i
1
I
i
}
Ii
I
i
I
1ST2S109337/3
1
N
ASSUME FRONT-LOAD OCTOBER 11 1990
EXPENSES
ASSUME FRONT-LOAD $109,608
REVENUE
r
ASSUME FRONT-LOAD $358,722
I~ t
i
AVAILABLE FOR DEBT SERVICE $249,114 a
I ~ J
I ;
i
1ST2W109346/10
1
r
i
,
TITLE: ASSUME ALL FRONT-LOAD REFUSE COLLECTION
EXPENI)ITURF. DETAIL:
AC RE STED
C OUNTM ACCOUNT TITLE
4 8021 SERVICE/MAINTENANCE SALARY $ 20,858
1,556
8061 FICA 10204
_ 806;. TWOORRKMIANS COMP 1,542
8ut4 INSURANCE 3,232
i ~ 8055
3, 824 FUEL 8104
300
UNIFORMS
Ih 8108 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING b0
atzl
5, 522
8342 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
B507 MOTOR POOL LEASES 700000
I
1_500
9110 RADIO
5).09,509
i TOTAI REQUEST
CHANGES EXPECTED IN PERFGRNININCE MEASURES;
tl
WORKER YEARS +350091
CUBIC YARDS DISPOSED
i
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: is neaded
Is expected to Increase driver by $358,122
ruck. Commrclal collection,
I~ along wf h a All
To assv I per year or $179,361 In the first six ninths.
I~
,
1ST2S109337/4
k
J
,14 :.r
t..
4
ACCOUNT N ACCOUNT TITLE AMOUNT
6402 C(MEICIAL ',:E[-j (ICT 5 A`,T>IG) $174,361
ACCOUNT 1! CATEGORY YEAR 2 YEAR 3
PERSONAL SERVICES $ 23,431 $ 24,536
SUPPLIES 4,184 4,184
MAINTENANCE 100000 150000
SERVICES 70,000 70,000
6402 COKIERCIAL FEES 358,722 358,722
i
I ~
! 1
I
I I
I
I
`f 1
I
fff II
I 1
I
E
I
I
1
I
1ST2$109337/5
~r
b.
P,, s
s~q
SELL COMMERCIAL
EXPENSES
RESIDE NL AL C0I4•1ERC=IOTHER
` I
$ p S
0 F M $1,255,349
• 0
DEBT RETIREMENT 0
10,009 0
BP.O DEBT
50,477 0
DEBT SERV1Cf.
0
4 ADM, TRANSFER 215,311 - 649,595
1 6 lU4 - 0
DISPOSAL COST ----~-1 $ 649,595
$10687,241 $ 0
$2,336,836
GRAND TOTAL EXPENSE
REVENUE I
I $1,695,909
t RESIDENTIAL
0
CC#,KRC1AL
243,763
DISPOSAL
j 418 6
App;T10NAL DISPOSAL LESS 208
TOTAL REVENUE $2,358007
$ 21,471
AVAILABLE FOR DEBT SERVICE
would charge a franchise fee to the
Note: if CCmnercial Is sold, the City service provider. The typiCO) fee is 5% of gross revenues.
only is a Debt service9for avnewafacilitydistanticiPatedrto bewappro Imately111ty.
$500,000 per year.
1ST2W109346/11
I
o-
SELL COMMERCIAL
DIRECT WASTE ELSEWHERE
EXPENSES
RESIDENTIAL :%1MERCIAL OTHER
O E M 51,2550349 $ 0 $
DEBT RETIREMENT 0 0
BAD DEBT 100000 0
/ DEBT SERVICE 500477 0
ADM, TRANSFER 215,311 0
DISPOSAL COST 156,104 0 607,444
$1,687,241 $ 0 S 607,444
$2,2911,685
~ CQ.A1J? TOTAL EXPENSE
~ j
f Ik
1 REVENUE
RESIDENTIAL 51,695,909
i
COtf.RCIAL 0
DISPOSAL 96,305
TOTAL REVENJE $1,792,214
SHORTFALL 502,471)
- 2,4~ 53.55/yd'
4
RESIDENTIAL RATE INCREASE = +52.79 Per month
This course of action results In extending the life of the Landfill 10-12 years
from October 1989. Only $2110228 available for Debt Service after closure,
1ST2W109346/16
i
I
i
i
I y
1
' N
I
I
1 ~
JLJ
milli=]
1
~ 1
Fl'
i
DATE:
C1yP„CQUNCIL REPORT FORMAT ,
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
PROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manaiser
SUSdBCT: Telephone system
RICOMMRNDATIO : y
The City of Denton start finalizing a contract with GTE to purchase telephone 11
equipment.
r
f 1~1RL
We will replace our current Telephone system with a new system which has more
capacity and the latest technological features.
if
I
$ACSI GROVKD t
j Letter to Lloyd Harrell recommendation by Doug Arnold, Ltd. cost analysis.
I
PROGRAMS. ?ARTME S OR GROUPS APrECTEDt
All City Departments
FISCAL IMPACIt
$497,806
Respec lly s bmi t
1
Lloy srrell
Prepared byt City Manager
ar o ne
j Direct r of Data Processing
Appr e
l' R
Executive irec or for Municipal Services/
Economic Development
R
1 i
A
F ,
q :
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS 215 E. McKINr NE -VEN N TEXAS 762011 TE-EPNONE (817)566-8200
~F¢y~ U M i
November i6, 1989
DATE:
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
T0:
Director of Data Processing
FROM ,
1T~1 : Gary A. Collins,
{ SUBJECT: Telephone Study
the report n and
I am pleased to report that wYo awi11°q{nddattachedmajor
the telephone system study rnold, Ltd. our consultants on this
recommendation of Doug
project. of thou ar}ious pro Posalsor I°would vlike to review zthe "y
ana ycts
portions of this report and recommendation.
from four vendors which consisted of AT&Ts
Their original
Rolm, received proposals d ical ere Rolm, GTE and Southwest ee11 Telecom (SwBT .
ors prov ng fiber opt
l to the Service
j ity Hal
prcoosalorw microwave connection from
Center and from City Ha}} is the Spencer plant as well as
cabl ng Civic Center, Data
connecting the Library, nts } Processing and the Poliecallr there rtme is aoneed Y to lconnect°Data exi
{
cabling, As YOU may
Processing and PolicFdePIttwastouroopiiity nion}thataitt would be
lines for the QIS project.
mint cost effective if all of the cabling between buildings for
liar. With this in mind
both projor.ts were accomplished by one supper.
we ask the e City's Utility Department to give us a cost estimate for
The City's
as
installing all of the cabling for both projects.
This price quote was gave
rice t
utility he entiDePcabling needs forpboth proje ts. 57 for installing
the ant
from ;403 to $143,643 less than the qutes two buildingsrto City Hallpwith
vendors which were only connecting
fibs P Utility Department deserves a word of
appreciation for cabling. . qualOuirty effort They providad on this project.
~ ~
`ilize the City's Electric
It is our recommendation that we uw
Department to install the cabling needs for the Telephone System
and the OIS equipment and we purchase the telephone equipment an
have the antra building wiring done by GTE. If we eliminate the
inter building cabling from the proposals then GTE becomes the
I
z
low bidder of the telephone equipment and intra building wiring.
The C.rE bid was lower than the other vendors by $37,630 to
$122,b25. The next closest vendor to GTE bid the same equipment
that GTE bid which is Northern Telcom Equipment. Both Rolm and
AT&T are currently more technically advanced than the GTE proposed
equipment. These technical advantages will be available on the GTE
equipment in the mid 1990 time frame and we do rot feel the test
differences of $63,824 or $122,625 are justified by these technical
differences.
While we issued certificate of obligation for $650,000, tre total
cost of our recommended system is $497,805. This system will pay
for itself in approximately 5 years by reductions in our current
phone bill from GTE. This price would include all of the telephone
equipment, the intra building wiring, and tha inter building
cabling. At this time we would like permission to start finalizing
a contract with GTE for the new telephone system. It is
anticipated that we would bring the final contract to the City
Council on December 19,1989.
Some of the remainder of the funds from the telephone system
certificate of obligations will be needed to pay for anticipated
change orders to the telephone equipment, a general information
answering system that will allow the Denton citizens obtain
information on items such as hours of operations, garbage pickup
schedules, ball diamond and soccer field availability, etc. and
installation of air conditioning and electrical power control for
the new telephone system. We will be bringing these items to the
council in the very near future. It is our intention to utilize
the air conditioning equipment currently in the Data Processing
( Department's computer room for the telephone system and upgrade
f the air conditioning system in Data Processing for the recently
j approved computer upgrade. Even with these additional costs, we
anticipate still baing well under tho allocated funding level.
If I can be of further service or I can provide you with more
information please call.
Collins
ry
Ga
4g
00
r Director of Data Processing
telrecom
1
e
9
R
fi
11
`s
1
\1 TELEPHONE CABLING COSTS BETWEEN BUILDINGS
i
f
LOCATION FIBER
------TOTAL- EQUIPMENT CABLE LABOR
¢
CITY HALL TO SERVICE CENTER 19,358 8,000 12,358
SERVICE CENTER TO SPENCER PLNT 51,791 G,450 45,341 j
CITY HALL TO D P 8,874 51550 31324
CITY HALL TO POLICE 10,116 50550 41566
SYSTEM WIDE EQUIPMENT 26,319 8,319 18i000
---------------•--------------------------------------I
SYSTEM WIDE TOTALS
116,457 33,869 64,588-- - 18,000-
CITY HALL CITY VALL CITY HALL CITY BALL
FIBER EQUIPMENT TO SERV CNTR TO SPENCER TO D P TO POLICE TOTAL
8 SLOT CARD CAelE 750 750 750 750 3,000
110VAC POWER SUPPLY 550 550 550 550 21200
LOGIC/OPTICS 850NM LASER 2,450 2,450 4 900
LOGIC OPTICS 850NM LED '
1,550 10550 1,650 4,650
2 2PORT/CARD DCE/DTE 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 101800
REPEATER 0 0
TOTAL 8,000 G,450 50550 60650 26,550
FIBER OPTICS / CABLING COSTS A T & T G T E ROLM SWDTELECrDEPT -
- f
INTER BUILDING COPPER 50 720 116,061 680399 38,900 189000 r
FIBER OPTIC TERMINATING EQUIP l t504 20,128 INC.
FIBER OPTIC CABLE 11,335 33,889 f
36,856 32,126 961359 36,325 64,688
MICROWAVE EQUIPMENT 32,253 61,780 N/A N/A N/A
a,
TOTAL 121,333 2G0,100 104,768 110,860 116,467
TOTAL OVER CITY'S COST 4,870 143,043 181301 403
i i
T-V
r ',..r,
p
C
TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT A T 8 T G T E ROLM S W B T ELEC DEPT
_
11 SWITCHES 346,016 385,178 398,991 356,717 N/A
KEY SYSTEMS 6,544 9,506 11,987 9,274 N/A
OPTIONAL SERVICES 51,404 56,257 93,190 54,988 N/A
INTRA BUILDING WIRING 41,209 INC. INC. INC. N/A
DISCOUNT N/A (69,592) N/A (2,000) N/A
TOTAL ~1t5,173 381,349 504,174 418,979
AMT OVER RF_COMMENDED VENDOR C3,824
0 122,825 37,630 N/A 0
T
ELEPHONE SYSTEM/CITY CABLING A 'i 3 T G T E ROLM S W B T
SYSTEM GRAND TOTAL 551,630 497,806 620,631 - 535,436
i
AMT OVER RECOMMENDATION 63,824 0 122,825 37,630
I~
J
I
i
I
i ,
1
j
i
FUNDING RESOURCES
FINANCING AMOUNT
TELEPHONE CO 460,816
GIs CO 18,990
ELECTRIC BUDGET 18,000
TOTAL 497,805
i
i
I
I
i
l;
i I
I
i
i
1 ,r .r
1
I
i
i
ir 1-W
L
AMERICAN CITY
~ WHEN YOUR
I CITIZENS HAVE
t &COUNTY
April 1909 Vol. Ica, No. ! QUESTIONS 9
i
Answers Come Easy in Virginia
Mare local governments In hour. City officials believe their in- YOU'VE GOT THE
Virginia are offtriag resi- vcstmeat almost has paid for itself ANSWERS...
dents access to taps on mu. with savings on personnel cousid• AN$11
nicipal information via telephone, 24 tried. According to estimates, the
hours a day, seven days a week cost per call using operators is 52.87, HOURS
through the latest technology - the while the cost of automated answer. 2~ A DA~!
Automated Citizens luformatiea ing is 82 cents per call. In 1988, the
I
System (ACIS). city realized more than 323,000 in
A computerized audio storage de• savings.
vice capable of bolding up to 100 "We really value the Answerllne LL1 DAYS A WEEK!
pre-recorded messages is used. By because h provides our residents with
sequential access, the messages au. the information they need at their
tomatically are located and played convenience," says McPartland.
when requested by residents using Small towns receive as much bea•
touch-tone phones. efli from the system, as evidenced in
Vienna was the lust state In the Blacksburg, a community of 71,000.
action to use ACIS, which is under The town council in 1983 hired a
patent with a California company. customer relations coordinator to
Fairfax Counry, Falb Church, Al". centralize citizen commutdcalions. CURRENT USERS INCLUDE:
amdria. Lynchburg, Blacksburg and Four ACIS messages were leased to
Hampton are among the localities determine how citizens would re- The Town of Blacksburg
using ACIS. spond to an automated information Fairfax County
Hampton, with a population of system. The trial was a success, so The City of Falb Church
128,000, went on-line Jan. I, 19(81 officials leased and later purchased a calling its program the Hampton system aftbeirown. The City of Hampton
Answerlime. The city hired a local Four years later, Blacksburg's The City of Lynchburg
news broadcaster to tape 180 ma. Townfu receives close to 1,300 cab Montgomery County
saga on everything from where to a quarter and a second tape player Roanoke County
vote to how to complain about bark- bas been purchased. Customer rda•
ing dogs. During its Crest year, Am- lions coordinator Sandra Ely Lays Chesterfield County
swedine revxived about 17,300 calla. Towtfax Is popular even though ad. ' The City of Savannah, GA
All the municipal ACIS users in vertising has bees minimal, ' The City of Bristol, VA
Virginia purchased thew equipment "We regularly send releases to the ' Roanoke City
from Tek-works of Blacksburg, newspaper about the system's pro. ' City of Danville
In Hampton, the system was in- gress and additions to the service, • City of Chesapeake
troduced in response to the city but what helps most are printed
council's emphasis on increasing menus available in strategic Iota. ' City of Norfolk
commun3cadoru with ci&&w. "The Nom throughout the communiry. W'e ' City of Portsmouth
most challenging aspen of Introduc• also place listings In student and ' Rocky Mount, NC
lag the system was compiling the newcomer packe:j," she says. , City of Alexandria
Kripts on our too topics," says city Both Blacksburg and Hampton • City of Greenville, SC
public relations director June Me. ACIS coordinators stress the main • Johnson City, TN
Partland. advantage of the automated system tyThe start-up cost for Hampton's is convenience to citireas. Makirg ' City of Bristol, TN
system was just over 516,000 for two sure at the outset there is act a per.
tape players, new telephone lines, ception thtt city employees are
1 battery backup, professional narra• avoiding contact with citU ms or that
don and (lien listing coda. Hamp- this Is another "answering machine"
too scot fliers with tax bills and is very Important. Rather, the Put-
placeC them in libraries, and a com• you of the systems is to mate infor• Pierre listing was published by the lo- mation available day and night, ~t®~e~Works
J
cal newspaper and to the city's an. so en days a week, ❑ 1
must report mailed to &U households. erages 3 0 703/953w2631
Hampton Amwerllme averages 000 Thin raj War wristert DY Maureen i
ca11s a week, about 30 percent of savage, HampronP01k refs lour
I which occur during moo-business asstranr.
P.O, Box 663 Blacksburg, VA 24063
42 American City 6 County/Apell 1999
~ I I
i
f
S
WHEN YOUR CITIZENS HAVE OUESTIONS, S A DAY & 7 DAYS A WEEK!
YOU'VE GOT THEANSWERS...24 HOUR
crty o
ANSWER-LINE FALLS CHURCH With an Automated Citizens Information System
Ammon it MOO (AGIS) ycv can provide residents with information on
Hpur~lu4rd Ow~lonr ANSWER-LINE topics ranging from Animal control to zoning
enrxnb Nod ordinances and everything in between...and save II
` f„IA er awa Guaeon, money at the some time-
The system operates continuously and keeps track of
the number of t aies each message is requested.
One YOUR ACIS SYSTEM WILL PROVIDE:
Open
24 LJ - Open • 24 hour information rvailable to residents
Hours -er _L Open • One central number fer all information requests
cnu 24 Information that is always current and correct
772.4200 Yana Hours Management Informaton Reports on inquiries
CITY ' Callers with correct department phone numbers
K4LL 241.5130
W-CITY STUDIES SHOW: I
with
Well informed residents are able to comply
y"e"uq Uq Gcw++M
current laws and ordinances
. $2.05 per call cost savings to those Using similar
j systems y
• 87% of information inquiries art made after normal
business hours
gt% of public using the system approved it as an
-
effective method of information dissemination
' Mo-.Yd rM.'•
M Iw.. ~I
CURRENT USERS INCLUDE:
The Town of Blacksburg ' Roanoke City
' Fairfax County 'City of Danville
- 'The City of Falls Church - of NorfolkVake
A STUDENT ' The City of Hampton . h
& NEWCOMERS • The City of Lynchburg City ity o of Mount, Portsmoutut
• Montgomery County Rocky NC
GUIDE TO 10 City of Alexandria
^s~^so~_ _ • Roanoke County
• Chesterfield County City of Greenville, SC
--w--~ ~eLtRr~
The City of Savannah, GA ' Johnson City, TN
± ti - _ }y J ' The City of Bristol, VA City of Bristol, TN
w`V SLACK56UAG
-WQrkg
5ERYICES
-
ri - AND
. REGULATIONS
L7033/9534631
VA 24063 Blacksburg
(References available upon request)
I!
i
i
i
r,
I
h
ALMA-VoXi.l.
Automated Line Management Attendant with Voice Mail Features
Description i
ALMAVOX® Is a PC based Automated AttondanWoice Mail
System capable of processing up to 24 lines simultaneously.
ALMAVOX® will answer the call with a greeting message of your
' choice and request the caller to enter the Touchtone digits for
the extension required or a 00" for a live operator if the
extension is not known. If the line is busy or unanswered within
a specified number of rings, the caller is requested to enter
another extension or "0" for the operator or leave a personal
_ message in the extension's Mail-Box. The many features of ,
' ALMAVOX®, which are controlled by the Extension Owners,
ensure that any messages left are handled in a timely and t
I courteous fashion. Messages can be retrieved remotely and
Ii Extension Owners can be called off-site or paged to advise that ;
messages are waiting in their Mail-Box. ALMAVOX'sm Call JJ
` Processing features ensure that the caller Is never left hanging with a no-answer or busy and is given a choke to transfer to
Ihr a Ave operalor or another extension. ~
i ALMAVOX0 can be configured for use on Centrex®, PBX, or behind most electronic key systems. Several options can be ,
11 added such as, Telephone Directory, Interactive Digital Response and more. ALMAVOX® can be installed on any IBM
I oompalible XT or AT Computer equipped with at least 640K of RAM and a Hard Disk 0rfve (min 10MB).
Features
Voice Mail Messaging. When the line Is Message Wafting Notification. At specified
busy or unanswered the caller can leave a message intervals ALMAVOX* checks to see whether there
in a voice malt box, chose another extension or are any uncollected messages in the mail-boxes.ll
press '0' for the operator. there are, the Extension Owner is called and advised.
He/she can then pick up the messages. This feature
• Up to 1000 malt-boxes . is turned on or off by the Extension Owner who can
also specify the number where he/she Is to be
' Parsoriallred Greeting Message. Each notified.
s extension can have a personalized greeting
message that is activated by the Extension Owner I Name Identification. When an extension is busy
he/she Is away from the office for a short time. or doesn't answer the caller is advised for example
that Wary Jones doesn't answer" This confirms to
Personalized Announcement Message. This the caller that the correct person was dialled.
is ainlar to the Greeting Message but Is generally
used where the Extension Owner Is away for an Personalized Security Code. Each mail-box Is
extended period e.g vacation or business lrip.When protected by an Individual security code which can be
it Is activated the caller hears the announcement charged by the Extenslon Owner anytime, from any
message and Is given the opportunity to choose TouchTone* phone,This protects tho messages In r
another extension or the operator. The caller cannot the mail-box from being heard by other parties.
leave a message which avolds many messages piling
up in an unatte nded mall-box. i
M
e
- t
3
r. '
All Mail-box Features Can Be Changed Multi Directed Lines. Incoming trunks can be
Remotely. All features relating to control of the directed to specific ports for auto-answer or to the
mail-box are changeable from any TouchTonem operator.
phone by the Extension Owner, Those features that In WATS Routing.
are System options can also be changed remotely
but only by the System Operator.
Multiple Operator Stations. Calls to the operator
Guest Mall-Boxes. Temporary staff or visitors can can be directed to dilerent extensions (other than
be provided quickly with their own mail-box. the operator's console).
li minimum of 4•I1nes with expansion up to 24 not know the extension (ofPthenpersof n being the caller does
lines. they can be routed to a directory or to the operator,
Prints time of calf and extension number Automatic handling of Non Touchtones
chosen to printer. (if attatched) callers. Non TouchTonO callers are automatically
Prints extension being called and line being connected to the operator for manual caliproeessing.
used to monitor screen.
Extension not In service advice. It a caller
Transfers callers to extension requested. presses an extension that is not in service they are
directed to enter another extension or "0' for
Detects busy or no answer and gives the caller operator assistance.
the opportunity to enter another extension or "0' for
operator assistance. Dally and Monthly Call Volume Reports. Each
day and at the end of each month reports can be
Detects and handles caller errors such as generaled to give details of call usage for each
non-existent extension or taking loo long to enter an incoming trunk line and the amount of time that all
extension. lines are busy.This enables the system operator to
track if there are sufficient trunk lines available to
' Always gives the caller the choice of handle the incoming traffic.Monthly reports give total
connecting to a live operator. call volume by day, the number of non-TouchTonet
callers and the number of minutes the ALMAVO0
• Incoming Calls answered on first or second ports are occupied,
ring. Options
' Customized System Greeting.
' Can be integrated with other interactive programs to
' Remote updating of System Greeting incorporate information services such as product
Message.This is useful for example where the information .
business or organization is closed because of bad Increased voce storage up to 36 hours.
weather.
Immediate dialing. The caller does not have to Telephone Directory to direct callers to specific
wait for the greeting to be finished in order to dial the people or departments.
extension. Message according to time of day.
Greeting according to time of gay or day of
week (optional). For example ALMAVOXO can be For further Information please contact your dealer or
programmed to give a different message after hours Telephone Computer Systems.
or on the weekend.
i i
jele-Works
703/953=2631
i
P.O. Box 663 Blacksburg, VA 24063
i
~I
Tele Works
P.O. Box 663
Blacksburg, VA 24060
(703) 953-2631
•
E ip.
A HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM
FOR CITYOF HAMPTON EMPLOYEES
Call 727-6130
Hampam Employee Teletips is an aur.- To use Teletips, follow these steps:
mated Human Resources InlormaUOn
System designed to pros ide employes 1l Use a push-button, touchtone
telephone
sah free 24-hour 7-day-a-Reek taped 121 Renew the fcllowirg I1F( el topics and
informatwn about the Gtys personnel 1 2
se!ect the 3
7 message you c ant to hear
pohc,es programs and actisrties Tf~e 131 Dia+al 727-6130
re,cr,ed messages provide information 4 5 6
and answers to the Questions most 31 An introductory messag=w,U come
eauentPyasked bye+nployeesamcerning 7 8 9 onlbumayenherllstentotheent~re
the Harr nton personnel system 7e'et ps message and then punch in the 3
is nut mended to replace the Personnel # dlgrt code for the message trip < of
R oc es Nlarual or contact between the your choice. or you may interrupt the
empl wee and su.,ervisor but toot ler rtr ducuon by holding the sign
employees and their families the con-en • button down for 3 seconds and then
enee oI 24-hour-a-day access to inlorma- punching in the 3-digit code
tioncuncernmgemploymentwlththeCity 151 TodiscffromTelet~ps.
simply hang up at at any any time
Follow rg is a list of message topics a~,ail• 161 1Ise Teletips as often as you like If the
able on Hampton Employees Vet ps lire is busy please call again
CODE TOPIC CODE TOPIC CODE TOPIC
159 LIST OF ALL TELETIf 5 321 virginia Supplemental 333 wellness Activities
CATEGORIES Retirement System 334 Hampton City Employees Credit
322 Harnpior Employees Union
3121 BENEFITS AND SERVICES Retirement$stern 335 Credit Union Savings and Share
306 Holidays and Holiday Pay 323 Social Security Benefits Drafts
313 Blue Cross Blue Shield 423 When Can I Ret re' 336 Credit Union Loans
Highlights 324 Lorg•Ter^i Disability Protection 337 1 m Termmatirg Empioyri
314 fdaxicare Program Highlights 325 Answers to Questions Atx-lut what Should I Do"
315 El g brlity For Benelits Retirement 338 Wcfkefs Compensation
4 316 Group lde?nsurarn,e 326 Deferred Compensat on Program
317 General Information On Health 327 Arswers to Questions About 200 CAREER OPPORTUNITIES
Care Coserage Deferred Ccmpensatior--Tape 1 201 lob Recording Lire
318 Anssers to Health insurance 328 Answers to Questions Abc tit 201 Applying for Promotions
Questions-TapeI Delerred Corr persaaon-Tape 2 203 Testing
319 Answers to Health Insu•ance 329 Designah^.g Benef,ciancs 204 Application Screening Relerral b
OuestionsContinued-Tape 2 330 Employee Ass stare Program Selection
320 Health Ca a For Retirees 331 Help WO Alcohol and Drug n...n;,,,ud+
Abuse Problems
332 City Hall FoQd Services
i
I
i
I
I
i
i
0.
r
i[
S 1.
r -
1
t}
A HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM
FOR CITY OF HAMPTON EMPLOYEES
Call 727-0130
CODE TOPIC CODE TOPIC CODE TOPIC
205 Reclassifications 152 Education Loan Program 145 Personnel Policies Manual
206 Promotions 153 Literacy Program 146 Personnel Records; Release of
207 Demotions 154 Quality Circles, Problem Solving Information
208 Reassignments Groups 147 Human Resources News and
209 Reduction-In-Force 155 Hampton Challenge Information
210 lob Descriptions & Qualifications 156 Ad ninistrative Support Group
211 EmploymentofReParives& 157 Focus Groups 340 LEAVE ANDTIME•OFF
Retirees 158 City Managers Open Door Policy 311 Inclement Weather
212 Public Safety Promotion 6 Err picyee Lunches 341 General Rules Governing Leave
Procedures 159 Employee Council GAttendance
213 Administrative Upgrades 160 Venture Groups 342 Accrual Of Leave During
214 Re nstatemerit Prolonged Absence
215 TyoesofR-)sitions 126 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 343 Annual LeaveiVacationl
216 Aptitude and (merest 101 Grlevirg DisoplinaryActicns 344 Sick Leave
Assessments 127 Standards cl Conduct 345 Other Paid Absences
128 Political Activity 346 Leave Without Pay
141 CITY ORGANIZATION 129 Union A<Gvlty 347 Absence Without Leave fAWOLI
130 Public Statements 348 Time Off to Attend Funerals
300 COMPENSATION 131 Authorized Disciplinary Actions 344 Breaks During the Workday
167 Non-Monetary Rewards 132 Requirements For Suspensions G
Achievement Program Dismissals 118 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL/
169 Citizen Satisfaction Bonus 133 Department Rules and PRODUCTIVITY
205 How Reclassification Affects Pay Regulations 19 City Performance Appraisal
i 206 How Promot ion Af lects Pay 134 Probat onary Periods Process
{ 207 How Demotion Alfects Pay 135 Tobacco Use Policy 120 Alternative Performance
208 How Reassignment Al Pay 136 Safety Appraisal Systems
213 Administrative Upgrades 137 Reporting Accidents 121 Unsatisfactory Work Performance
214 Reinstatement 144 Empooeee-Management 122 Department of Productivity
} 301 Compensation System 6 Relations Philosophy Programs
Structure
302 htetitIncreases IM GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE '65 RECOGNITION
303 '+bur Pay Schedule and Salary 101 Definition 01 AGrievance 166 Service Pins and Certificates
304 Starting Salaries 102 Grievabce G Non-Grievabce Items 167 Achievement Program
305 Overtime Pay Compensatory 103 Time Limits And Steps In The 168 Hampton Diplomat Program
Time Procedure 169 Citizen Satisfaction Survey And
306 Holidays and Holiday Pay 104 Grievance Forms Bonus
307 Educational Incentive Pay 105 Grievances Based On Alleged
308 LongeviryPay Discrimination 365 TERMINATIONS
309 Bonuses Achievement Program 106 Pay During Grievance Preparation 100 Grieving Terminations
310 On-Call Pay 107 ChoosingARepresentative 337, 1'mTerminating Employment-
311 Pay During Inclement Weather 108 Vlordmg AGrievance What Should I Dot
109 The Grievance Panel 366 Resignations
115 EE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION no Panel Hearings 367 Retirement
PROGRAM 1 368 Separation During Probationary
1 116 EEO Officer 140 HAMPTONSMISSIONAND Period
j 117 Grievances Complairi VALUES 369 Disability
Discrimination 370 Separation Without Prejudice
142 HUMAN RESOURCES 371 Dismissal
15D EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT ADMINISTRATION 372 Separation of 1AAE Employees
AND CAREER 143 The Department of Human 373 Reduction-in-Force OrLay•Off
DEVELOPMENT Resources
Of Training Programs 144 Employee Management
Relations Philosophy
y
GREENVILLE
InfoUne
Taped Ar►swers to Ouestlons on Oreenville Public Services
Gnertvele lnfallne, a 4a
"MW of the City of OreMvrne, 420 rp.eeo, a0°`nw tti4tei,q 7a0 Cm+rlaodL
b an automated ayalem dnry wd 472 LM MN d cwtt,a.,
to Ptovrde ChlEene wtlh hea, 241. 4" ' U~d l hmn Ow4.nq phn 241 44 em 8arouryn ,wnyd..
h6umlw-dey, ?-day 4r,e.a 24
tapedlniomwtlo 7 CM Ort,nanw
e'pef•week 42, Fame F,wry,wy b ,and7 241 CkO CwI
n, The Worded f 24 Fun
ft"" Ps answw the Oueelbne P0,4.4,t 249 J ry "
moht hpuenlfy eked by oht2ene "e $.",1 PawS~j~^e 244 Lapal 4a
wo an the Clfy 01 OTeen Nne. "a ian^2 GrdNna. R.N.,r ,47 M41't404 Can
lnfouM 1e not dealpned 154 ru y,;,,,vy Can
to replace Denon-lo-puaon t ----.-gym 204 P°iFm"T'etbi
centacY but Mhee l6 afrw you 722 P4e0rd4 t..et. O,q""M T.
the InfOMallon you want when 157 C,wmt of cwm , P
602a
YOU need IL 151 Ea , c,*,. s,., 127 Swat tan 0818,;
t33 nn b Stan a Sian.. w4ry,n
IN TM
ionow rq is a lief of ft /nqy 1
25 't ~ 11'11
aDe 140 L411 wtniq rl"n + tiagrNt
ropka ovsll&ble on lnfo(Irw,
147 sew Su", 6w+4a 270 (~CI+II
142 CanWmt pmow, 109"
C449 "arY y SeClv~ rMa llnn, rx..Ngn 2M 331
E4eeon q Ctry Garry
1711 a-~adf 144 ti4naon En.Nan Xgri," 2~ haw b tan.a Ganut V&M"
Pragr 772 Fauv Omda.
` 170 Garr Crt. lnnw At""' Ong
"S C49m%w Erwwl>. G"MIAO
' Fmrom~, 777 VOW P.V"S,
f 721 Ciry &,.d, Comm..;or..nt 1141 44 "'0 lam 4pgr.m. 77, when EAM M N Nab
Cammme4. 1147 Gn4~.,ee TECH : 2a w*. N or e wed OmwenT
7111 Grry Camel k44uq. 141 Red CM" 13o3wu Proq r ,
130 Cp C 'd t4.w,114 4gwy. t 41 T°'.ewr.n . Sww us 41r! Gw Cd"Oard an T.ne
1 M4W
3" coffv4va 'Ma C4, S"", Cirr hen, Lk* 20
r w,724 Qvq Ca,nyd , 177 wn.n w Oot w a P.,qw G~k
3" Cq HM ft" of GPw.e.n rtl
~V 72e ROAM y b G9' Se,
evout"
follow these steps fa use OMenville ln/oune
t>o 6OImaLLl6au
St Ado en kwnd i~oWno t ph"".) n~aW,one 414 Rntolv+a waxF cvVy r;o7
15, MwW swiwwU Sims the 0""
I M oat Li M 04m~ d94 C004 pumper of dy maFaaCe You wan! to
1S4 ~tao M nch in IN man r ,,W 2461460,
ft" rare 1,
trot a" mN1ap y,10 bV L you
420 nags wq 1*M p Y in rrd M eves d* OW* fa me m~,Ua"
a Dirt . ar erR;p the Npodwbon T
4211
eullwv Pwma w the e,M-014 phone do,, 1101 P,,4 ,eearoa and shiny Pinml 9
&Iwo" P4aurN V To dfconne,7 h Onde
am
~ Gr So Oafs,, VN tha eenke Y ofl~ul ''V'epy A4,
ham kg' u am, Fm e.
tm cyu M pity
424 E'MCpt6 Gar, y4cMr4t w
GREENVILLE,
'releWorks 1nfoUne
P,O. Box 6ti3
7 03) 953 2631 240-4489
i
i
I
i
i
i
~T
IF low
}
r
7
9d17
340 n9RS>~wil
376 AIDS InWmarlM ut a 10111". Ga C"
FVleadaaa SM"x TWmnoA 341 DOW
Cory"" A47 O SOM ul W a TwaftSrum 347 CNa No" aa3 MA' Wadi Pmgp
Pn Enwparoo 3U Cnu9 aw AIm1'al Proew" 476 o Camar vMo
744 Elmwnma rw HwaT 444 adwm.bat
llOdat 3N ryPWSVr9 Sy torw BlooO PMaure 5crwnilga 44 445 and Fo" 6 Shoodrq Loch
s Yoo;r w Win M CKF 3471 G~wm136 Cam" MUM CP0. u7 ate D'ana'
F
167 C" w llnaagroysd PaoPW 5a 1 446 PVVO qw -a7 pool
1w FJnpwtm4o mi, coy d arm 346 NWT E'i' PMI u9 ItPI PMI
16A E¢ud Emde7mM C9u"I 749 l" Let
440 cvmrapw~wva
129 Cq Ja01M 453 Nwrw wath S&I 750 ~i
456 'mmur+nOwu
410 457 Masmd7 54MCO 251 *-Sw-
bQH am Radon 753 a a MaV1wva
375 "A
43 1 SII 1 Wsmrftad Dion, 2S3 Gr Jl WAW 37a.m
1u 7S6 TA@v t 754 Patl Ya SE4.am RuOaV
177 C Jo I, d F41
4]t !W Jong M A4,.N,1 339 WC Pwa'A 25S Scant 69"
417 Prwndl d N d M 256 5"0 51
413 Gn 'lo Caw? t6WYAn 257 Sam. RONw
414 GI 200 310 bawflakw 756 W. Canna Rog S4 A,mw.M
4[5 MvI Audron+a 74111 711 Cltr MouYl'6 AaNamlaawn
VNwmYPan 2w nh222laMd 2WA
410 W,powar` Arts CAand 7,2 Grom+e P'nI Wmoat'I -
' 713 MAI W HSOnanr4' 227 AArR EOuuao
4X s . Lu t MM16,dg 3t4 a Vrq C*m*wMa 227 AnT1o4r[a Anas'SNad A,sg1.
713 Nas.q Ca,+14l 436 Emsryanq SI N III
>tl Nd:ur,2 NamnY
U1 A Cwaw C/ u ol 3ti Ho1mR 1n60K9ana 714 E" M SdrPd
477 CYrrPd 6rau'aY DYTM'd }11 Ny.~rsr uamsnarca As4at. 22S GY I Saudu» And "RI
AM C47 IJedal s,9 Narna Gwnp,nP A.VY 725 06"W.-40g
h 431 Ca vwros C lI SslwtM 231 Scrod AOUdann
159 CASH Cal A+b w mnw btama09NLS - 417 SCeaat Boaz Ima.
776 Lost Pa A 110 216 Sdwd Holidays
to wo roam aw D4tl AMmat Prd.W ]w F6"41 d LM6maronY, 2-7 51,0oY WAw PWom"
,60 Lla' Ca•P1Ynm prwmMw 5.110 Cto 2,1 Tmwpwlallan and Faad 54K.w
1 V Naq"owlladd CkNUP , y4 nl.naanY sr' o d no Cmn 2.9 vout..r Eaura+an
164 P Uw" GYfls"71o l
Cothdlorl Yd m.dae b06A 2,0
too Sanna6w SRI lIC ®o.=--'--
4u Aowrmo0a'rmvCom.r,aon ims 71 r (:om " Wane Propw
j u0 (p i7 2,2 Mgd w WNW
433 AM Tartu Amac»t 1,1 Santa Adorn
u1 5" W C97 Sancti 466 CamaMtbK rk Hato', 6+nw
j S,rveo 114 sr.w CA11ww tstaws ApM6Ys
461 &A~ lianlM 7 NOWWW InbrMa30o 215 fu RsId~E10Y'F. GIWwd
719 Cry AaC'Jae t7 216 *ran,dogon W Ksmoolpp.d
479 CA76I Fh-u 409 W41naKw WV7aa '
US Ha. bnG_A,1~T~'M. w"'~11r 004 Usstt~ 770 hSll~a~EE 119 r wu
261 279 All PmOlW A 111 AFDC ProQra^w r
117 %woo" 6 FQVW Pat"
2a Pn1wa Ms 61 Pam CemmCoda 113 CntO ProtrHCllns Surca/
2w roam' oa 'ropwdww 366 0ark FIRM IWYwYU ta Canty 4 CPputmrd d Soda Savko
~r 73A Fw CYda Pnmb M7 Olm*tArM 113 f6m7F CaumAw03An"a
C soon 263 Foe DINW11"►"I Edxaeoe 369 Dawnaa+ 1,1 Finacw Autstan PMWW
Pro9rwrs 256 Gmm4I6 ypwapst sedum 117 Food Atplta+0a "I
I` 766 III Donto wra Goa udo.mloo 709 Justin 91 Cw Cold
707 Fft'"M Cwnm Coma, 4tH HW^a^~6U
2O Fn maocw'6 171 Ll swl CoRw o, of E.YMa 119 AbdKarPMadaad
177 sm-*rq Crdk'Arl° 125 $."no tads 127 SNARE
121 W4a G omI Corm CwMW 109 Sold Sow" l
361 Sn6N 106 LMtad IWUnbwe ERwr9 M AWOL
ou 470 toodawn y60 L2y y6
4p6 Ch I dvl'21a7a4 459 Cwnmunry Pwnn4p Card
437 HhY b Go a W✓7 C410 466 CN~,M Admuvnno. 357 Pn Taa Pray' •'n Santa
251 w" leagarw 227 Pvtond Pro' 1
363 uau7 Mw" Rooms P.alnnp 321 ProWmAn :Tug
467 Gromps Cam' PurW Ca"Q^'
Spy N~aarc ImsnOLa 777 hopt7 Agg No wl
736 Ran P10I TRI
779 Pm U Dods End DaNO+Ym
+ Tun
156 5"th C 1) to
r I 350 It70aA1C6DB6UR4)WdE
Y 351 lwld Pa¢,641relpadwe
757 PAR: 61S sivwm
The City at Greenville: 363 6 C Dma/lln ss
Serving... protecting,.. Caring
i
I
I
i
f
x
i
i
i
i
i
E
III L-LIF-I
H 1111
i
t ~
I
~j
!D
CITY of OENTON 1215 E, McKinney I Denton, Texas 76201
bJEMORANDUM
DATE: November 17, 1989
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
/ Y 1
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
!
SUBJECT: FREENURT AMLNUMENi'
The "Freeport Exemption" amendment (S.J.R. 11) was passed by the
voters on November 70 1989. The amendment, effaddedeSJanuaryl1J !
199D, of the Texas Constitumerchandise, other tangible personal
goods wares, natural gas, and other
olies roperty t and ores other than oil,
p
petroleum products to be exempt from ad valorem taxation if: V
! (1} The property is acquired in or imported into the State
to be forwarded outside the State nether or o State M
intention to forward the property outside this
ert is
is formed, or the destination to which the ia°acquired
forwarded is specifil-d when the property
in or imported into this State;
(2) The property is detained in this State for assembling,
storing, manufacturing, processing or fabricating
purposes by the person who acquired or imported the 1
property; and
(3) The property is transported outside this tats not
later than 17S days after mhe date a the, person or imported the property State
Mr. Joe Rogers, Cnief Appraiser of the Denton Central Appraisal
District, has estimated that the to the a'Freeport Exenption'tht°
` would fall within this category o
be approximately $64 million. 83 per $1 u i lion werthexempted
at the present tax rate of $.61
give an estimated tax loss of $420,UOU property tax.
I
1
f I
I
I
}
1
4
Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell
November 17, 1989
Page l
If Council decides not to allow the exemption, official action
must be taken prior to January 1, 1990 to tax the property for
the 1990 tax year. For subsequent tax years, if no official
action is taken for the 1990 tax year, action must be taken
prior to April 1, 1990. If an entity decides to tax the
property, it can later rescind the official action taxing the
property and exempt the property in future years; however, once
the decision of taxation is rescinded the property can no longer
be taxed.
Attached is a listing from the Denton Central A
of their estimate of the local industries that wouldsbe affected
by the inventory exemptions. Also, we are in the process of
surveying other cities in order to find out what their
intentions are. The survey should be available by late Monday i
afternoon.
If you need any additional information, please advise. i
I ~1
rriv' h'C~ V
in A c rave
I ~
JFMcGtaf
Attachments
i
4966F
I 1
11
I
I 1
I
I
IMPACT OF FREEPORT EXEMPTION
ON CITY OF DENTON
FSTIMATED
INDUSTRIALIST ACCTS. PROPERTY INVENTORY INVENTORY PROJECTED
OWNER NAME DCAD # TOTALS EXEMPTION TAX LOSS '
PETERBILT MOTORS CO. P901366 $30,274,700 $27,247,230 $168,469.62 ]111
TETRA PAK MATERIALS P100042 11,910,200 11,314,700 69,958.79 1
ANDREW CORP. P113984 10,000,000 9,000,000 55,647.00
`VICTOR EQUIPMENT P902794 8,574,100 8,000,000 49,464.00
SALLY BEAUTY SUPPLY P900732 4,870,000 4,000,000 24,732.00
i' TURBO REFRIGERATION P901819 2,758,800 2,500,000 15,457.50
JOSTEN'S INC.
I P903162 2,75 ,000 2,000,000 12,366.00
ACML BRICK CO. P900145 2,000,000 200,000 1,236.60
UNION CAMP P900832 1,149,400 800,000 4,946.40
MORRISON MILLING CO. P901475 791,500 400,000 2,473.20
MOORE 6USINESS FORMS P126245 767,900 500,000 3,091.50
RUSSELL-NEWMAN P901554 6000000 300,000 1,854.90
TRINITY INDUSTRIES PDD1797 481,900 80,000 994.64
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS P152514 470,700 470,700 2,910.34
OHIO RUBBER CO. P901176 4520000 452,000 2,794.72
KOLMAR LAB INC. P901232 420,500 400,000 2,473.20
EMC PLASTICS P901518 297,500 0 0
SAFETY KLEEN P901346 283,300 283,300 1,751.84
HARPOOL SEED INC. P90085?. 250,400 0 0
SUN CHEMICAL CORP. P132408 138,700 35,000 216.41
M & B METAL PRODUCTS P900955 121,700 20,000 123.66
RONNIE BYBEE'S
P901500 100,000 0 0
THUCKIN' TREADS
WAGNER CERAMIC PRODUCTS P901787 37,700
0 0
LAKE CITIES CONCRETE P904354 31,000 0 0
MOORE BUSINESS FORMS P902193 18,400 0 0
DAVIS CONCRETE CO. P900337 7,500 0 0 j
LATTIMORE READY MIX P900913
i 5,000 0 0
1 JAGOE-PUBLIC CO. P900930 3,000 0 0
TOTALS $79,568,500 $68,002,936 $420,462.12
1
"All of this information was supplied by the Denton Central Appraisal District
I '
C~ I
I
DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
3411 WORSE STREET
R o Box rxe
DENTON, TE KAS 7570}
JOE 9.R'JG CRS, BA/RP A/RTA H7 SeFDROa OF DIRECTORSt
TROY NYITE, Chairman
chief ApD[alut JON B[CR, vlne-Chaltrun
JOHN D. RROIM, PPA J[RAY CAC[, secretary
Deputy Chief Appralser CEARENCE MGRS /I
JOE A. rORSITHE RICKNW C. SMITH r
Ceputy Chief Appraiser
rof rlnmoe and Collections PC14 2oN
Id E IS 0 MANAGERS O N
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 1989
TOt LLOYD U. HARRELL
FROM: DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
SUBJi FREEPORT EXEMPTION TO BE VOTED ON NOVEMBER 7, 1989
FREEPORT EXEMPTION
V
E
House Bill 2959 will repeal Section 11,01 (d) and add Section 11.251
in the Tax Code effective January 1, 1990 contingent upon the passage
of Senate Joint Resolution 11 by the voters on November 7, 1989. The ,
new section provides for a "freeport exemption" to implement the
constitutional amendment {SJR 11). The "freeport exemption" will
apply to goods, wares, ores, and merchandise other than oil, gas and
petroleum products (defined as liquid and gaseous materials i
immediately derived from refining petroleum or natural gas), and to
aircraft or repair parts used by a certificated air carrier, that
are acquired in or imported into Texas to be forwarded out of Texas
within 175 days of acquisition.
The chief appraiser determines the amount of exemption by determining
the percentage of the owner's inventory that left the state within
175 days of acquisition in the preceding year or in some cases by an
alternate method, and reducing the current years inventory by that
percentage.
The governing body of a county, city, school, or junior college
district may vote to continue taxing the property. The taxing unit
must act before January 1, 1990, to continue taxing the property in
1990 and before April 1, 1990 to continue taxing it in subsequent
years. The taxing unit can later choose to exempt the property. The
unit may not act to tax the property after April 1, 1990.
I
1)
1
~I
i
I
ULAR SESSION PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS S.J.R. 11, § 2
POO million of SECTION 1. That Article VIII, Section 1, of the Texas Constitution is amended to read '
this article, and N follows:
rotided by law. Sec 1, (a) Taxation shall be equal and uniform.
of Texas water al Property in this State, unless exempt as
Phis article for (b) All real property and tangible person and conditions required or permitted by this Conatifution, whether owned by natural persons or
ind corporate of ecrporations, other than municipal, shall be taxed in proportion to its value, which shall be
for acquisition, ascertained se may be provided by law. and may also
'hat En:rolre tlr (c) The Legislature may provide for the taxation of intangible property Y
'
e o t 01the bonds impose occupation taxes, both upon natural persons and upon corporations, other than
, municipal, dolirg any business In this State. It may also tax incomes of both natural '
lern ,io use of the persons and corporations other than municipal, except that persons engaged in mechanical
ion, any entity and agricultural pursuits shall never be required to pay an occupation tax.
members or
-IM d The Legislature bg general law shall exempt from ad valorem taxation household
ents ofetale O
for not held or used for the production of income and personal effects not held or used
the Texas Water for the production of Income. The Legislature by general law may exempt from ad
a section for the valorem taxation:
YU, and subject (1) all or part of the personal property homestead of a family or single adult,
rlc and by lazy "personal property homestead" meaning that personal property exempt by law from
forced Pale for debt; and
rants from the (2) subject to Subsectioa (e) of this section, all other tangible personal property,
Wail walerand
except structures which are personal property and are used or occupied as residential
defined by law, dweliings and except property held or used for the production of income.
under
s authorized b (e) The governing body of a political subdivision may provide for the taxation of all ,
pmentfundfo property exempt under a law adopted under Subdivision (2) of Subsection (d) of this
section, and an section and not exempt from ad valorem taxation by any other law, ons er iita TUans M of the (1) ((p)) The occupation tax levied by any county, city or
town for any year on persons i
water or corporations pursuing any profession or business, shall not exceed one halt of the tax
for ppaaying the levied by the State for the same period on such profession or business.
1{7iilt anq of
sterest on (host SECTION 2. Article VIII of the Texas Constitution is amended by adding Section 1-j
money coming to read as follows:
Imaged by this
Sm. 1 j. (a) To promote economic development in the Stott, goads wares, r+ter-
ind inurest chandise, other tangible personal property, and ores, other than oil, natural pas, and
or become due e other petroleumpp products, are exempt from ad valorem taxation if:
propcrly outs detthis Sate is 1
!y fo the bonds th(ie) Stthe pro ate, w ether or not the infention to this State to
ed to the voters formed or the destination to which the properly is forwarded is specified when the
d to provide for property is acquired in or imported into this State;
o authorize the (Y) the property is detained in this State for assembling, stormy, manufacturing,
ands for water processing, or fabricating purposes by the person who acquired or imported the
property; and
ass 30. Nays 2, (J) the property is transported outside of this State not later than Ifs days after
` as 137, Nays 2, the dale the person acquired or imported the property in this State.
(b) Tangible personal property exempted from taxation in Subsection (a) of this
section is subject to the follouing:
(1) A county, common, or independent school district, junior college district, or
4 municipality, including a home•rute city, may !as such property otherwise exempt,
ff the governing body of the county, common, or independent school district, junior
college district, or municipality fakes official action as provided in this section and
in the manner provided by lain to provide for the taxation of such property.
im ad valorem (Q) Any official action to tar such exempt property must be taken before April 1,
1990. If official action is taken to tar such exempt properly before January 1, 1990,
rposea, h
such property is taxable effective for the tar year 1990. However, if euc offida j
action to tax such exempt property is taken prior to April 1, 1990, but after January
A-3
1~
r
t
r 5J.R. § 2
71st LEGISLATURE-REGULAR SESSION
1990, the official action akall not become rjjeclire to PROPOSE;
1991 tan year, tan 8.114 property until the
exefmptf of Payment Of W political subdivisions shall hate the authority to Hnma a m
polihca(subdi visions for them such poropert located in each ab thoitmed
Properly from 1989 tares, g Ytar 1.89. a poeernt7t bod January 1,
impal and re the gotern ing body ehal! raltr 1989 y faces malnady o finis vn b~
f4) Toe fund 1989 fovea al already paid on such
ptnKrnlnf body of a county, common, or independent school district °jhce onnd
Junior coilegedutnel,ormunicpalitylhatattyunder Subd '
(b) of this section to tar the property that Ocle iende r duties
section may nbsequt ax exempt b (P) 0f bsect- designated
action M tar Y erempt the properly r Y Subsption a ojthis and the C,
flit property, Toe eremptlon appl=ca to eac4 tat yea ~y r c i a if, eonsidera t
the da a the oclion is taken and applies to thetas year in which the action is taken I
lfthepot+erningbod a f SECT01
y not tao begins
the property ma Y provides A goterning body that rescinds !te action
at an else ti
that kke action to for eurh properly q/Ier the tea votin
c to lax
fJ For purposes 0 this section: clesio't g for =
(I) G np161e peroonal Poperf of county =
y shall Include aircraft and aircraft part,; Adopted t
Property Imported into this Stott shall include property brought into this
Slate; that N
f8) propyerty forwarded outside this State shall include propert vote: !
outside this State or to be a by the
and fired !o an aircrgn to be transported outside ` sported Filed with i
(4) Property detained In this late Or assembling, storing, anufacfurin Stale;
~n99, orfabrieatinp purposes Shat include property, aircro
pro-
b b or aircraft into this
S/a!e or acquired in, this State and g~arts
a~quire red the ptop roperty, alters "rd m f sop
aircraft, or aircraft o or aircr
aft parti in or who brou9~t et he properly,
o °
f a=rcrgt! operatebY
a a eel this :State jot the purpose of repr:ir or maintenance
SECTION 8. This Ificaled air carrier.
at an election to be held on ed ciRe 1989 The s eru7t, nal amendment
the voters 9°tu ion a '
ballot h fill b submitted to posng
voting for or against the proposition: 'The constitutional amendment promoting economic nda for acq
growth, job creation, and fair Printed to provide for institutions, a
and nations by restoring and alowing, on Texans who ex lion Institutio
exemption for certain g. one local option bas s gouda to other n states
tax
of assembling, storing personal property that In Texas only tenporanly or ~hepurpo e Be it
regoj,
I
Adopted b the ' manufacturing, processing, or fabricating," SECTION ON
Y Senate on March 18, 1998, by the rollowing vote* 27, Nays 2; Ma Tht 1
y Subsection ( I
•25, 1889, Senate refused to co
ment of Conference nmur in Hasa amendment and requested a lcX!)
Senate; Ma Committee; May 26, 1999, House granted r ppoint•
following vote, 7 Y~as 1989, 9Nays at Aedopted Conference ,quest of the,
he obA~ation Do the 15, 19119, by the following vole: Yeas pte Nays 0 one ewith nminee 1m pmentM y May section and
rect
1899, House granted request e: the Senate fora P new rcorrrect
lee; HMay 29, 1989 ouse granted House t tad
repair co
vote: Yeas 143, Na s 2 of Conference Comma por ten
oe Conference Committee e Report by the following (Y) TAl p
Filed with the Secretary of State, June 6t 1 gag oting.
I approval o
status ojl
the princip
this subsecl
81R. No. 16 SECTION 2
to be held No
obligai
i SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION against the p general proposing a constitutional amendment to abolish the office of county surveyor in certain expansion
s is
counties, corrections ins
Be it resolved by 1hr LegWalure of the State of Tcra9:
SECTION I. Article %YI Adopted by l
Subsection Section 44, of the Texas Constitution is amended by adding that the
(f) to read as follows: vole: Y
A-4 by the fc
x Filed with IN
y
i
,
i
f
1
i
i
i
~ f
FRT;HII
t
CITY of DENTON / 215 E, MCKinney I Denton, Texas 76201
MEMORANDUM
i
DATE: November 15, 1989
TO: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
FROM: Mark L. McDaniel, Budget Analyst
SUBJECT: COUNTY ROLLBACK ELECTION
On November 13, 1989, the County Judge recommended the attached red reductions to fund the tax rollback. This b udge
on thec sa a date was
subsequently adopted by the In brief, the adopted plan .,ill affect
ambulanc servi ut•ion~Al
city by a •t least 54 for library a t the emergency
the City has received a previous commitment that to the
'
I
~ management contribution will not be affected, the County Budget
Officer has stated that h as recontribution sult, below is la schedulewof whatlthe
j ` of the tar. rollback.) As f City might expect in the way of adjusted contributions.
1989-90 1929-90 1989-90
SERVICE _ ADOPTED ADJUSTED (51) VARIANCE
f r
j County Ambulance Service Contract $110'141 $112,044 $15,897
County Library Contribution ZOjyl4 1,101
Emergency Management Contribution 22.018
$4 0 $389
~_..i
It is important to note, however, that the Court has reserved the
right to adjust the 51 reduction in the event particular operations
find it impossible to reduce expenditures. A complete and detailed
withidn of the
tax reduction
rollback election.
Please advise if I can provide any further information.
`j~-L. !a e
{
MI.McD:af
4963F
xc: Monte Mercer, Controller
f
~y
I
t
NOVEMBER 13, 1989 1
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
RECOMNENDCD BUDGET REDUCTIONS TO FUND THE TAX ROLLBACK
DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
SAVE AMOUNT AMOUNT TO REDUCE FUND BALANCE $4,200,000.00
ROW PROJECTS TO DEFER $403,197.00
51 ACROSS THE BOARD REDUCTION $1,59G,803.00
GRAND TOTAL ~
-1 $-,200,000.00
------TOTA-----------------------------------------------------
1{ 5W ACROSS 'PHE BOARD DOES NOT I14CLUDC DEBT SERVICC OR LAW LIBRARY
I
1
i
i
I
r
i
1
~J
V 1+
L 11
' I
{
i
IV
i
~ I
t
i
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September S. 1989
The Council convened into the Work Seesion at 5:30 p.m. in the
Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem Ayer; Council
Members Alexander, Boyd, Gorton, Hopkins and
McAdams
ABSENT: None
1. The council received a report regarding amending the j
Zcning Ordinance by adding design standards for the Oak-;hickory
Historic District.
Mike Cochran, Chairman of the Historic Landmark Commission,
stated that four areas of concern addressed at the public
hearing held by Council on August 1, 1989, were further
clarified in the draft ordinance presented. The four areas of
concern were: the materials allowed for fences, the size of
signs, the type of flags and the definition of wind devises.
Flags and wind devices had been more clearly defined banning
those for advertising purposes. Problems with metal fences Lad
been addressed in the draft ordinance. The Historic Landmark
Commission reviewed the amended ordinance and recommended
approval.
Council Member Gorton questioned wind socks that had
advertising.
Mr. Cochran indicated that this problem was addressed in the
advertising definition.
Council Member McAdams questioned if the definition was too
vague and needed to be more clearly stated.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the amended draft ordinance had
been reviewed by the Legal staff.
I
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, indicated that her office had
reviewed the amended ordinance.
Council Member Hopkins questioned if the size of signs affixed
to buildings were too small.
Mr. Cochran indicated that the doctor's code of ethics required
a certain size sign and this amended ordinance was in
conformity.
2. The Council received a report concerning the proposed
resolution approving Policy Number 107.06, Occupational Injury
Benefit Program.
fI
f
r
e
i
r
City of Denton City council minutes
September 5, 1989
Page Z
I
Harlan Jefferson, Risk Manager, stated that the purpose of this
I'I policy was threefold. The policy would inform employees and
supervisors of their rights and responsibilities. The policy
would protect City ce-3ources by putting a cap on how long a yob
would be held for an employee. The policy would also
positively impact productivity by not holding a job for an
indefinite period of time.
Council Member Gorton asked if the upcoming special session of
the legislature which will be addressing this situation might
not make some changes in this policy.
f
r i Jefferson replied that this policy had been drafted over a year
ago. Staff decided to go ahead with the policy after the
i workman's co,apansation issue was postponed in the last
legislative seaaion. Nothing that had been presented at this
{ time would impact this policy.
3. The Council received a report regarding adopting an
Appendix A for the Denton Development Plan and adopting an
amended Concept Plan for the Denton Development Plan.
` Bill Claiborne, Chairman of the Appendix A Task Force, stated
If` that the task force had been created to incorporate standard
i` methodology for intensity analysis and the boundaries of the
intensity areas. The task force took into consideration trip
Cates and methodology in developing three categories of
Ir activity: low intensity, moderate activity, and high
intensity. Many problems were identified by the task force
and addressed. The recommendation of the task force was for
adoption of Appendix A and adoption of the amended Concept Plan.
4. The Council received a report regarding amending the
Denton Development Plan by deleting multi-family and high
density housing developments as being eligible for intensity
bonuses.
Harry Persaud, Senior Planner, stated that this amendment would
delete multi-family and high density housing from the list of
land uses eligible for an intensity bonus. The concept of the
Denton Development Plan was that the donation of land for
public or community facilities would get a bonus to develop
multi-family and high density housing. The Appendix A Task
Force in its deliberations on a standard methodology for
calculating intensity bonus was concerned that the bonus would
be granted for multi-family and high density housing. No
bonuses had been granted for multi-family or other high density
housing since the adoption of the Denton Development Plan in
September of 1988. The Appendix A Task Force recommended
amending the Denton Development Plan by deleting multi-family
and high density housing developments as being eligible for
intensity bonuses.
I ~
i
f
M
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 3
5. The Council received a report
Shelter Advisory Committee. concerning the Animal
of Coumse muniBityl
Bill Angelo, Director al Shelter Act,
recent leyislatuce passedHo
lSM2er37vi9c,esAn,im stated that the
for
alreadyiin ompliancea with 0tthepmajorityT of Cthe pr Denton was
this act. Three basic changes would be provisions of
inspection of facilities by a licensed veterinarian an annual
; 2) sick
and injured animals must be housed separately from (healthy f
ones; and (3) establishment of an Animal Shelter Advisory
Committee for the purpose of assisting City to comply with this
act. Membership of this committee was specifically outlined in
the Act to include at least one licensed veterinarian, one city
official, one person whose duties include daily operation of an
k animal shelter; and one representative of an animal welfare
organization.
After some discussion, the consensus of the Council was to ers memberlsto t be aomcitizen,wi not fiinvolved meby o (the fifth
membership in any of the mandated categories or group ion two
or J
(2) members shall be appointed to serve a term expiring on June
J
30, 1990, and three (3) members shall be appointed to serve a r
term to expire on June 30, 1991, to be determined by lot at the
first meeting, r
6. The Council convened into Executive Session to discuss
legal matters (discussed In Re' Flow,
unty ve City
All Al_Khafafi Vs. +t~ --n Co ,
- ~ and struble vs City), real estate, and !
personnel/board appointments (considered appointments of Adjustments, Building Code, Cable TV Advisory CBoard,
C
Board, Human itizens Traffic Safety Support Commission, Electrical Code
services Animal Shelter Advisory commMain ittee, tandt the Adsory
vNorth
Texas Higher Education Authority).
The council then convened into Regular Session at 7:00 p.m, in
the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephene; Mayor Pro Tem Ayer; Council
Members Alexander. Boyd, Gorton, Hopkins and
McAdams
ABSENT: None
1. Presentations of "Yard of the Month's awards for
September.
Postponed until the next meeting.
I
I
I
,
r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 4
2. public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing and considered
adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas,
providing toe the approval of a planned development district
of land located on the 1-35
I
detailed plan for 1.727 acres nd within Planned
service road, ad)acent Wolfe Nursery, urae a
penalty in the maximum
Development 6 (PDb)% providing for an
t' and provid ng
e mended
Commission recom
amount Of ffective $a~a0'00(planning laand n Zoning Comm
approval.)
The Mayor opened the public hearing:
i
~ NOTE: THE FOLLOWING SECTION OF MINUTES IS VERBATIM FROM THE
I TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING.
deveopment
ard,
getltlemen of tthe pboBoys;
Al Meloro, National Mayortor] Of
'
Ilaood eveninq.
my name is Al Meloro. I am National Director Of
Mayor Stephens: "How do you spell you last name?"
- r - C, I am the National Director
Al Meloro: "M - e - 1 - o We are here before you
of Site Development for the Pep Hroval. 1 would like to a
I this evening for final site plan appPP know the Pep Boys You i just summarize our b a ease such as Dallasland Fort
Worth. But
from the surrounding automotive
` duet to clarity some matters that this store will employee 3
people from the area. We will only be selling !
pacts, no •ased pacts, and service department, We will install
the items that we sell. The ttra hland ticesasill bcaneatly
kept. The area will be very e the There is sate vehicular ttatflc doarhave athprotfecorand a
pedestrians rand ample packing. I
to otheeBoboard ard. as
andlike give thissubmit
exhibit. I that his would
basically States that out type of business and th~aet w e wa l be
h doing what we say we are going to be doing, &C $650
million corporation. We have been in business since 1921, and
we ate on the New York Stock Exchange. We very carefully look
' at locations, select them and then come before cities, such
will
yourselves, to a put will developme minimum wage yobs.thThey are
'I going to be creating Y good money.
be the type of jobs that will be paying V89
positions well be opened, sands people
As -
aietant Managers
Cull time and pact time, cashiers - full time and part time.
And in the service department, there trill rime ssistaot
Managers, technicians, and installers and rt
there will
tin outu busiestaday, arcs
time. So it c~sn time
people. At any particular shifts
approximately 15 people Working but because of the swing
j in out hours, there will be a total of about 30 employees which
is which will be all new yobs for the area.
I a
I
F -T;
a'
ti.
City of Denton city council minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 5
"1 have a rendering here of the building. This is what the
building will look like. And um it is a masonry building,
jteel construction. The construction alone will be
approximately about $1 million for the building not including
the land so its we are not trying to Mickey Mouse anything or a
a cut any corners. You can see that it is i well planned type
of building. It is our prototype. This particular building is
used throughout the United States. As I eaid we come before
you this evening for our site plan approval. We are very happy
that the Planning Board recommended a with a unanimous vote and
-'1 we ask for your consideration this evening, and I thank you
very much."
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Mr. Meloro. An
Council might have for Mr. Meloro? Thank you, air? Ue At questions
ahe
at the conclusion of the day's today's work day, a something
was brought to the attention of the legal staff and I thought I
would mention this while we are waiting for the next person to
come down. And if you would please, just a moment, I think it
was about 4:45 today a new interpretation of how the 20% Rule
applies to this proposal was brought to our attention and I
thought at this time for the benefit of the audience 1 would
like for the City Attorney to address this issue just
momentarily concerning the 20% Rule and how it would apply to
this particular case based on the Attorney General's
interpretation. Miss City Attorney."
Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney: "Thank you, Mayor. Ah, as
you stated, late this afternoon, ah Council, or the applicant,
Pep Boys, did visit my office and brought to our attention and
alleged problem with the calculations of property ownership and
abut ...well how ...abutting ownership that would be necessary
under State law to invoke the, requirement that the Council take
a or that the Council vote to approve this application by a 3/4
vote. What that means is they're saying that it does not take
a 3/4's vote, but a majority vote. And they did cite and
Attorney General's opinion in support of their position. Due
to the fact that it was about 15 minutes until it was time for i
me to leave for Council meeting, I have not had a chance to a
research this yet and the Mayor has and has asked that I
communicate this to a let the Council know after as soon after
tonight as possible whether or not the 3/4's rule does apply."
I Mayor Stephens: "Okay, thank you Debra. Ah, the whole point
here is and it kind of leaves us in a quandary, we want to go
ahead with the meeting. It has been postponed too often and we
want to complete the public hearing and make a decision. If
uhm four or five members of the Council should vote in the
affirmative then what we are talking about here is uhm, well if
six vote in the affirmative then there is no question about it
at all. It would be approved. If four or five vote in the
affirmative
i
r
4
.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 6
then the question will have to whether this motion carries or
not will have to be determined in a day or two after the J
attorney has time to study the Attorney General's opinion. If
less than four vote in the affirmative, then the whole thing is
moot anyway, but we wanted you to understand that a before we
proceed a to what sometimes I understand has been a lengthy
proceedings for this a particular issue. So at this time we
continue then please those who would like to speak in favor of
this proposal."
George Weatherall, Henry S. Miller Development Company: "Mayor
_ Stephens, members of ttie Council, my name is George
Weatherall. I'm with the Henry S. Miller Development Company.
I'm here on behalf of the owners of the subject property and a
as a matter of introduction I would like to point out that this
property went under contract in April of 1988. We initiated
the site plan approval process the latter part of August 1988
so obviously this has been going on for quite some time now and ,
we just much as anybody would like to see a quick but fair
resolution to this entire matter. One thing that needs to be j
emphasized In tonight's hearing is the extent to which Pep Boys
has gone to modify their initial site plan based on comments
and observations by the adjacent property owners. They turned
the building 45 degrees so that the bays face the freeway to
eliminate a perceived noise problem. All the loading will be
done (rem the front of the building. In fact, there will be no
entry points on the back side of the building whatsoever. J
Dumpsters, trash area, will all be in the front of the building
and in fact the building has even dropped 7 feet in height
based the the new grading plan for the property so relative to
the old plan the building will appear to be 7 feet shorter a
because of this new grading. The building has moved closer to
Wolfe Nursery and a most importantly a concrete wall will be
built separating the subject building from the a homeowners.
this is a a going to be a masonry construction versus the
minimum standard of a six foot wooden fence as a established in
your Development Guide and in addition this wall will not only
stop at the property line but Pep Boys hopes to buy but extend
past the Mervyn's shopping center to the drainage channel and
my understanding is that right now there is a problem with cars
driving across a through this neighborhood to the alley behind
the Mervyn Center. This wall will eliminate that problem and
this wall will be a part of Pep Boys construction, A in
g addition to the wall, a a landscaping buffer will be planted
that will provide additional acreenage both visually and
audibly for the protection of the homeowners. The trees will
be evergreen and so far as the leaves will be there year round
and in fact there will be a a landscaping buffer between the
building and the property. There is a drainage easement back
there now and a a the City will still be able to maintain this
easement with no diffil:ulty whatsoever a a and it will in fact
be a a grass with these a trees buffer."
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September S. 1989
` Page 7
' "Again, Pep Boys has gone to great expense to implement these
modifications and has done the best they can in conjunction
` with us to work with the homeowners and the City staff to
design the most acceptable building for Pep Boys. A a I would
like to emphasize that the extent of the amenities in this
t design greatly exceed the minimum criteria In your Development
Guide a and again at Pep Boys' expense. A so we have done
' several revisions. Traffic has at one point been an issue, We
feel like with the recent modifications to Dallas Drive this
has been greatly alleviated and in fact when Interstate 35 is a
a improved It should be even a a better source of a traffic
through the area, safer. It certainly is safer now. I've
noticed in my drives out there that the a blocking down to one
lane is greatly improved access through this area. I also want
to emphasize that with Colorado Boulevard now being open, a it
V~ provides another means of access to the Mall area and with the
I exception of the homeowners in Township It most people should
I take Colorado because it seems to be a easy means of access.,'
i
"A couple other points 1'd like to make. A first of all, we j
believe that this is this is not a zoning case. This is a site 1
plan approval process. A the property was zoned in 1969 and a +
j it was zoned commercially. Pep Boys meets the requirements of
the a zoning in 1969. A we have a we feel like as long as they j
meet the Development Guide set in 1969 this is a non
discretionary issue. It should be approved as long as they
meet the requirements. A we pay property on this tax for over
ten years. Based on this investment and several other
investments in and around the Mall, a a Dunning Development as
well, a we feel that we are one of the largest taxpayers in the
City of Denton and have done a lot to to help this city and we
feel that it's only fair that we get to use this property for
what it's already zoned. A a a we ask you to treat this the
way you havo all planned developments prior to 1986. A a as a
as it should be. The first of all another point I'd like to
make is that the economic impact of a Pep Boys could bring the
city somewhere in the neighborhood of $40-50,000 in sales tax.
A a there is a positive multiplier effect. There will be
thirty to forty employees involved here and most importantly
or.e thing you need to be aware of that the imminent opening of
the mall in Lewisville a has a really concerning a lot of your
local merchants. When that mall opens, you'll start seeing {
I some attrition and whatever we can do to help in attracting Il
national retailers such as Pep Boys will only help to stop that
I outflow. It's going to greatly effect,.,we've been in this
business 25 years and we've seen all over the Metroplex."
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Mr. Weatherall. Any questions the
Council might have for Mr, Weatherall. Yes, Mr. Boyd."
f Council Member Boyd: "A what was the 1969 zoning of this?"
I
f
f E
e
a3 $
L t
city of Denton city council Minutes
September 5, 1989
page 8
George Weatherall: "ln 1969, this property was zoned a
combination retail/office." have
tail, And nw°ould Iat would the wasn't t Hoye it zoned
Council Member Boyd' been
allowed in
retail/recreational, wasn't it?"
George Weatherall: "Retail, part °t it was. but a unthe der that
portion of the zoning was what they
c retail
criteria and Pep Boys meets all the criteria in the
zoning."
Unidentified: ,It would not have included the muffler," ,
Council Member Boyd: "I'm SorrY."
Unidentified: ,It would not have included the muffler."
council member Boyd: "Yeah, it was my understanding that it
would not a since you since you'll be selling mufflers and some
things that were not allowed....." t the George Weatherall: "t me MeloroCe stated o thatatit thatpldoesngaana
zoning hearing r
contradict the proper use that mufflers would not be installs
in this store."
You're
Member Alexander: "Let me clarify. asking for
approval of this site plan based on the 69 zoning is that
E
i correct?"
George Weatherall: ,And Subsequent modifications. In 1973, 1
believe."
Mayor Stephens: "Any other questions of Mr. Weatherall? Thank lik you, sir, is there anyone else in
he Anyonen elsehoto ospeak in
to speak in favor of this proposal?
favor? Anyone else in favor?"
Susan Mead, 1445 Rose cla[nu thDallas s 1 Mr.InW196herall has
asked me to get up and Mayor Stephens: "What is your name?"
Susan Mead: "Susan Mead, M - E - A- D- E•„
Mayor Stephens: "Your address, please."
Susan Mead: 111445 Rosa Avenue, Dallas, TX."
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you."
t
f
a
t
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
k September 5, 1989
Page 9
Susan Mead: "In 1969, the property received a land use map
designation of retail and office. in 1973, there was a
modification to that land use site plan and it was zoned
commercial. Under the commercial classification under the Code
that was effective, Pep Boys complies in all aspects. Under
the 169 retail, the muffler stuff that we Just talked about
could not occur and we'll be happy to restrict against that if
that is what you deem as necessary. The 173 site plan was
adopted by ordinance, it was attached to an ordinance in 1981
and has been used by the City of Denton since 173 to judge the
uses that are permitted in this shopping center. Does that
help?"
Council Member Boyd: 111, I think it does somewhat. The a it
was my understanding that there was some the 1973 ordinance was
adopted by voice vote. Is that your understanding?"
Susan Mead: "The 1973 site plan was approved by the Plan
Commission and adopted by motion as I understand it by the City
Council. In 1981, there was another ordinance that had that
site plan attached to it and the City has used that site plan
since 1973 for every single development plan, approval, for
every plat, for anything oleo that has occurred in PD6."
Council Member Boyd: "A all right...."
Susan Mead: "And I have staff reports that esaentially say the
same thing."
Council Member Boyd., "And are, I'm trying to determine if
f we're doing this right. Are you relying on all three of those
or is there a particular one or a...."
Susan Mead: "I'm relying the precedent setting nature of the
1973 site plan because that was what my client was given prior
to the purchase of the property and that's what my client
relied on showing that his property was commercially zoned back
in 1974 when they bought the property."
Council Member Boyd: "All right, it said, wasn't it, was that
the one that was commercial and recreational?"
S+Isan Mead: "Yes, sir. And commercial in the Code that was in
effect at the time. Covmercial to me means more office-like,
commercial in the Code at the time was a, had some uses that
1 were not permitted in retail and that's the muffler use that
4 you..."
Council Member Boyd: "Right."
i
E
f
i
k
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1984
Page 10
Susan Mead: "...recalled. Uhm, so whether you put us under
retail or commercial, there's only one area that we're not in
full compliance with and that's under retail is the muffler."
Council Member Boyd: "Okay."
Council Member Alexander: "Again, could I.....
Susan Mead: "We believe our property is zoned commercial."
Council Member Boyd: "The recreational aspect of the zoning
its, how do you explain that?"
Susan Mead: "I can't. Thank you."
Mayor Stephens: "Mr. Alexander."
Council Member Alexander: "Excuse me. Me, Mead, I wanted to
clarify. The provisions which would allow mufflers to be
installed would be based on the change that occurre6 in 173?"
Susan Mead: "Yes, sir."
Council Member Alexander: "Or would the muffler provisions be
attached only to the 169 ordinance? That's the really the
question I'm trying to clarify?"
I
Susan Mead: "Uhm, the commercial..."
h
Council Member Alexander: "The 173 amendment...."
I
Susan Mead: "Sure."
Council Member Alexander: "...to exclude the muffler
installation as part of the ordinance, is that correct?"
Susan Mead: "The 173 amendment would permit the muffler."
Council Member Alexander: "The '73 amendment would permit,
okay."
Susan Mead: "Yes, sir."
Council Member Alexander: "That's what I thought I understood
earlier, but a
Susan Mead: "the, I'm sorry if I got up to clarify and further
confused it."
i
Council Member Alexander: "If we apply the '73 provisions,
then, and agreed that it was in fact commercial, then the
muffler installation could not be excluded. If we applied the
'69 provisions, the muffler installation could be excluded."
I
v 1
s,
City of Denton city council minutes
September S. 1989
Page 11
Susan Mead: "Yes, sic."
Council Member Alexander: "Okay, it's the question of whether JI
we accept the '73 amendment as part of the original 169
ordinance." !I
Susan Mead: "Okay." 1
council Member McAdams: "Does it not also include the question
of our information tells us that that site plan said
- commercial/ recreation and there's some question about what
that actually means and you are a taking one position about
commercial a as just simply straight commercial zoning is what
1 hear you saying and that's your interpretation of that and it
is there that then that you are saying would allow the
muffler sales."
Susan Mead: "Councilwoman McAdams, I spent about, between two
and four hours in those files and uhm what 1 believe to be the
case is based on reading every staff report, every zoning
request and looking at every ordinance that was passed and
commercial..."
Council Member McAdams: "We're talking specifically about '73
when it says, that's the year when you're saying that the
change was made and that change according to the information we r
have said commercial/recreation." Il
Susan Mead: "But that 173 site plan was incorporated in a 1981
ordinance as well and was referenced throughout by staff
reports as commercial...." j
Council Member McAdams: "But it still, it still Said 1
commercial/recreation." J
Susan Mead: "I cannot tell you what the recreation stood for.
I can just tell you that the City staff represented in a 1981
memo on September 4. I believe, that the 1973 eite plan showing
been used
name 173. That memo was
was commercial
written on our urSetember property of had
attached to an ordinance in 1981 that was passed on December
the 15th."
1 Mayor Stephens: "Did you have another question?"
h ` Council Member McAdams: "No, cause it didn't that did not
refer to that particular site. There was no reference in that
181 to that particular site, so it is just a difference of
k opinion about whether a whether it had anything to do with it
or not but it did not reference it.,,
Susan Mead: "Do you know that the chart....."
i
4
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 12
Council Member McAdams: "That's okay.-,
Susan Mead: "Okay. the chart I submitted to the Council has
about 25 different cases. That 473 site plan was used in each
case. Thank you very much,,,
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Me, Mead. Is there anyone else in
the audience who would like to speak in favor of this
proposal? Anyone else to speak in favor? Anyone in favor?
Then, is there anyone in the audience who would like to speak
In Opposition to this proposal? Please come forward. Again
4 your name and address, You have five minutes,"
stirs, Royce Weddle, 1512 San Gabriel: "Yes Mr. Ma Coucil
Members, I am Royce Weddle, 1512 San Gabriel. r qht rbehind nthe
petitioners property. I have a quick, can I ask a questica
before my time starts? „
Unidentified: "Oka Y. sure."
Royce Weddle: "Why was exhaust exclude:]?
Mayor Stephens: "That's I mean' you know,"
part of your time .,,,41
Royce Weddle: "Alright,,,
Mayor Stephens: "Keep the time going, Madam Secretary,1,
Royce Weddle: "You know, why was exhaust excluded? Can
anybody answer that?"
Council Member McAdams: "It was just that retail zoning.,,,,,
Mayor Stephens: "A, Mr, Weddle, Ms. McAdams, you have five
minutes to make your
might ask, well ask thesStaffior,thedC uncilato addressnthose
later. We are here to get input from the citizens, please,--
Royce Weddle: 11
behind the proplert'y okay. Folks, I'm a homeowner, live right
Association and we are definitely opposed of the Homeowntype
to the Pep goys type
of business. if I a. I'd y to ask out rou to tand
so you know that you4te citizens e are turning gouty for sCity
government. These are people from our neighborhood," Y
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you for coming."
' Royce Weddle: "
You got copies f vitciaculated a petition. I think all of
o
neighborhood oppuse the Pep Boys bor so ago,
uilding, 11A 931 of our
record that we would rather not have a 2 signatures on
garage right
i
Our Hoard of Directors and out membership in our
' P has met
lC
1 p'
6
Y
City of Denton city Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 13
Royce Weddle (continued); "with Pep Boys in the past. We have
set down with them and we admit they've made some changes, but
we still think that we that we would do better if we had the
same type of businesses that are there now like Mervyn's and
st:ictly retail. They're good neighbors, they don't bother us,
we don't bother them. We would hope to continue with that type
of business that a we feel like Pep Boys are that type of {
business, not just Pep Boys, but hav'ng a garage kind of II
violates the spirit of that type of business that we all
thought was required quite honestly. Nhen we moved in the
neighborhood, of course I didn't come town and check with the
City, and I'm not an attorney, but I kind of thought that the
retail offices like Mervyn's and those people, that that was
the only type that could be there. Of course, we have since
learned different. I'd like to quote a staff report to the P&Z
j regarding negotiationa. Quote 'Staff feels that there should
be a limit on the number of times a neighborhood is expected to
defend itself against zoning that is perceived as a potential
detriment to the character of its area through the negotiation
process.' of course, we're still doing that, but we, we're
Just wondering how many times we have to to continue to fight i
for the quality and integrity of our neighborhood. We object
to the noise from vehicles passing through the location. We
object to the noise from, just the total number of vehicles
'i that's going to be going in and out and all the machinery. We
understand there are going to be 1200 trips per day through
that organization and when you add that to Wolfe, on a busy
day, folks, I'm afraid we're going to get gridlocked. There's
just not that much room back there for all those cars. We
object to the possibility of making Dallas Drive more dangerous
than it already is. You know, there where it crosses in front
of Wolfe Nursery. There's been 194 accidents there with 92
Injuries, 2 fatalities in two years from 185 to 187 and that's
a lot, folks We object because our homes and property will
definitely be devalued. There's no question about that at
all. Who would want to buy or rent a house right behind a
garage that's open till 10 o'clock every night, Saturday,
- Sunday and holidays. No where in Denton can we find where a
4 high volume garage is located so close to residences. If you
approve this petition you will be creating a dangerous
I precedent similar to Houston of Arlington, two cities that
people can do anything they want to at any time and now they
M wish they had done something different. Approving this
petition will be in violation of Denton's awn zoning codes like
we've been to talk, we understand that it's zoned office and
retail. We don't think that Pep Boys is either one of those.
Other cities we've contact, a garage like Pep Boys would be in
a light industrial or strict commercial or a mall type of
setting, it's obvious that the people most effected by your
decision do not want this garage in their neighborhoods and
hopefully, the citizens and residences of Denton will be more
Important to the council than an out-of-state business. Like I
I~
i
x
a
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 14
Royce Weddle (continued): "said earlier, we're not
anti-business, we're yust anti this kind of business. In
closing, as you decide this petition, please remember the
problexie created by this garage won't be shared by the
gentlemen seated to my left. They live in the Metroplex,
Philadelphia, California, wherever, and other places and I
doubt if any of them live directly behind or close to one of
their own stores, but they want us to. Ladies and gentlemen of
the Council, all the folks seated to my right live here in
Denton and we will inherit these problems, and live with these
4 problems ani suffer from these problems long after these other
folks are gone. We strongly urge you to deny their petition.
Thank you."
Mayor Stephens: Thank you, Mc. Weddle. Does the Council have
any questions for Mr. Weddle? Yes, Mr. Boyd. If you would
please, we don't permit demonstrations, I understand your
'E sentiment. Mc. Boyd."
Council Member Boyd: "I have a couple of questions."
Royce Weddle: "Yes, sic."
Council Member Boyd: "Were there any specific requests that
you made of Pep boys that they did not comply with?"
Royce Weddle: "A, not to come in. That's it. No, the changes
they made were all voluntary and and and we, you know, we truly
are cognizant of the fact they made a lot of changes to try to
V try to work the thinq in, but a it's still a garage and you
know."
Council Member Boyd: "If we accept for a moment their argument
that this zoned commercial/recreation or commercial.
V Commercial/ recreation, I guess, is is a bowling alley or
miniature golf course or something like that. Would that be
more acceptable to you?"
Royce Weddle: "A bowling alley or a miniature golf?"
Council Member Boyd: "Miniature golf course, or a go cart
track?"
r-.. Royce Weddle: "Quite honestly, no. Not to me personally. i
+ can't speak for the membership. We, once again, we were under
the impression that the type of businesses that are there now
would be the type that could go in, only could go in, which is
shop, a video store, a Mervyn's, a a day care center, a
doctor's offices, those sort of things."
I
,i
r
r ,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 15
i
Council Member Boyd: "Right. Well, that, evidently, that may
not be the case, but let me ask you another hypothetical. What
if it is determined that this is commercial in zoning which
does allow considerably more than office in terms of what get
in there, would a Jack in The Box or a Red Lobster or something
like that be more acceptable?"
Royce Weddle: "Boy, we all like Red Lobster a lot. Now we've
all talked about that, but..... A a I would say speaking as a
r just living right there, no.,,
1)
Council Member Boyd: "Okay."
Mayor Stephens: "Any other questions for Mr. Weddle from the
Council? Thank you, sir."
Royce Weddle: "Okay, thank you." j
Mayor Stephens: ,is there anyone else in the audience who
would like to speak in opposition to this proposal? Please
come forward.
Harold Harkins, 1405 Sandy Creek: "I'm Harold Harkins and I
live in the Township it addition. I'm not going to be a
$500,000 taxpayer in Denton. I'm not going to hire the most
people that a a that anyone else does in Denton. I'm not even
going to hire 50. I'm just a citizen of Denton. I've been
harassed by zonings since I've lived in Denton these 9 years
F beyond belief. This is the fifth time since I've moved Into
this community that I've come in for a zoning change. Each
time I've sacrificed. I've said sure our a officials here are
looking after our benefit, they're looking after us and I've
gone along with you every time and every time that you've made
a zoning change it's made my property value go down. Henry S. !
Miller's harassment crew that's come with these last three
zoning changes. We've give them everything they asked for.
The developer that was working under Henry S. Miller was going
to put a fence through there before. It was agreed on here.
We never got a fence. We never got anything but promises from
Henry R. Miller. We never got anything but dreams. And now
they've come back with another dream. Of big taxes for the
city, lots of employment and we're entitled to this and the
f lawyer says this zoning entitles them to this. Tommyrot. It
1 doesn't entitle them to this. This zoning here is for retail
businesses and for office buildings. Whenever I bought that
property and 1 built that house myself I knew what the zoning
was. Then you, yourself, verified that I was true in what I
believed. When Midas Muffler come along and set in a muffler
shop in 19 and 81, you said no because its commercial. And now
Henry S. Miller, very important harassers, have come again with
the same tommyrot and they want you to give them everything
they ask for because they are Henry S. Miller. They haven't
done a thing for the City 'of Denton but take money out of it,"
S r
s
R
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1969
Page 16
Harold Harkins (continued): "Let's go a little bit further.
I'm just an ordinary taxpayer. 1 don't have much money. I
have supported every one of you that is sitting here on this
panel and if you support this change. I'm going to support a
change in Denton which we definitely are entitled to. Henry S.
Miller says the City keeps up that easement. That's a bunch of
tommyrot. The City doesn't keep up easements. The people keep
up easements. I've got one running down the side of my
keeps it inuptheNocityWe runs
and Do you
there property with and across oslawnmowers back.
don't
have that kind of money. But Henry S. Miller is so important,
they think that we ought to run out there and take care of
their easement for them. Now he's going to build us a fence
again all the way down to the drainage which is a problem that
they've created. The drainage down there that's going to cost
G me a taxpayer a whole lot more money to pay for his drainage.
You say, well it was there all the time. Well, it was there,
but it was a little bitty thing, but it's a great big problem
right now. Then, again, 1, I'm just a taxpayer. I've been
harassed five times over zonings and every time its gone
against me. This time, it's going to go against me. My taxes
have gone up, up, up, up, up and believe it or not, I'm a
builder. I built that house myself and I can't even get the
money that I put into it nine years ago out of that house right
now and I'm not talking about making any money, I'm just
talking about the initial building costs. I'm not talking
k about all the shrubbery and the other things. So, I'm against
k this zoning. I rsk only from the elected officials of the
` people of Denton, that you support us like we supported you.
Thank you, gentlemen."
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Mr. Harkins. Any Council Member
have a question for Mr. Harkins. Thank you, sic. Is there
anyone else in the audience that would like to speak in
opposition? if you would please a I know how you feel on this
emotional issue but we do ask you to keep demonstrations to a
minimum please, yes, which is zero."
Janet Sahliyeh, 1330 Laredo Ct.: "My name is Janet Sahliyeh,
my husband....."
Mayor Stephens: "Pardon?"
Janet Sahliyeh: "My name is Janet Sahliyeh, we live at.....
Mayor Stephens: "How do you spell your last name, please?" j
Janet Sahliyeh: "S - A - H - L - I - Y - E - H. We live at
1330 Laredo Court. My husband couldn't be here tonight because i
he is teaching a course right now at UNT, but he did want me to
i
i
1
z
i
V Y
1
I
1
I
j
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5. 1989
t Page 17
Janet Sahliyeh (continued): "come and say a few words for both
us Just from a family who is concerned about our neighborhood.
We came to Denton three years ago, never had a house before.
and two years ago we bought a lot in Hopkins Hill and very
excited, it's a beautiful area with lots of trees, all kinds of
wild animals, rabbits, we thought what a wonderful place to
raise our children and we built our house, our dream house, we
never had a house before and now that this issue has come up,
we're very much afraid that the value of our house is either
not going to hold or its going to go down. So this is my main
message. Another side note, I might put in is that my husband
is totally blind and he likes to hear nice sounds like birds
and dogs barking and so forth and if we're going to have a lot
of noise from a garage, I don't know if he's going to be too r
happy in that neighborhood any more. So, I'd like to appeal to
all of you as homeowners and concerned people that I don't
think you'd want this kind of business in your own backyards
bringing down the value of your property and making a lot of
noise. Thank you."
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Ms. Sahliyeh. Any Council Member
have a question of Ms. Sahliyeh? Thank you, Maam. Is there
anyone else in the audience who would like to upeak in
opposition to this proposal? Anyone else in opposition?"
Billie Harkins, 1405 Sandy Creek: "1'm Billie Harkins, 1405
Sandy Creek. I would just like to make one statement. This,
the zoning here in 1979 I personally came down to the City of
Denton to check the zoning. It was retail/office and my only
point I want to make to you if it's commercial why has Henry S.
Miller had a sign on this piece of property retail/office since
1975. That's my only statement."
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Me. Harkins. Any Council Member
have a question for Ms. Harkins? Thank you, Maam. Is there
anyone else who would like to speak in opposition? Anyone else
to speak in opposition?"
j I
Virginia Hoope-, Olmos Creek: "My name is Virginia Hooper and
I live on Olmos Creek, right behind Wolfe Brothers and I Just
add whatever has been said before in opposition. I Just
reinforce that. But I'm using Wolfe Brothers as a a standard.
If I have to face something worse than Wolfe Brothers, it's
bad. Wolfe's Brothers wakes us up with their loudspeaker every
morning at 9 o'clock and it goes till 9 o'clock every night.
I The radios go constantly. The traffic is terrible. Our place
abuts theirs. So you see the fence doesn't help us either. It
doesn't come, I don't believe it's planned to come behind Wolfe
Brothers. And it's right next to Wolfe Brothers. This I Just
1 wanted to add to it."
i
~ I
I
4
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September S. 1989
Page 18
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Ms. Hooper. Any Council member
have a question for Ms. Hooper? Thank you, Maam. Is there J
anyone else who would like to speak in opposition? Anyone else 'I
to speak in opposition? Anyone to speak in opposition? At
this time then we shall hear from the petitioner for a
rebuttal. One person who represents the petitioner and if you
would please confine yourself to less to five minutes or less
and to only the opposition questions that were raised. No new
information please." I
Al Meloro: "Mr. Mayor, members of the board, as far as noise, ;
_ uhm everyone is concerned with noise. 1 grant you that the
first site plan that was put together was de.initely wrong.
Although I was not involved at that time, I will take blame for
h that because I work for the Pep Boys. We had no right to do
I something like that. We did change the building and moved the
service bays facing the highway which did turn 90 degrees.
Noise is like light. It does not go around corners, noise goes
straight. Any noise that emits from the service bays will be
j going out towards the highway, not towards the residents.
+ Number two, as far as traffic, it is zoned commercial. You
could have a restaurant, a Burger King, a Wendy's, and these
neighbors could be faced with some of the items that go along
with a restaurant like being open to 2 o'clock in the morning,
traffic that would be far exceeding our traffic, the gentleman,
the president of the Homeowners Association said 1200 trips a
day. That's 600 customers and they're counting in and out.
Fast food would be somewhere between 1500 to 2,000 cars per
day. Round trips that 2,000 times 2. We can all see what that
is going to be. As far as the traffic, the state is aware of
the traffic. They're making changes. The City's aware,
they're making changes. That's going to be a safer
intersection and area than it has been in the past because
people have been aware of that. As far as the ho+]rs, out hours
are until 9 o'clock in the evening. A restaurant would be open
until late in the evening, early in the morning, maybe until
one or two o'clock. You'd also be a subject to the greasy
smells of the restaurant, of of we all know what fast food
smell like when the food is cooking, I'm not saying that it's
bad, I'm just saying would you want to be subject to that. As
far as landscaping, I think we did c:r share in putting enough
landscaping there. We're not frugal when it comes to
landscaping. The company has that 1 work for has given me the
d ability to do what is best for the surrounding neighbors. I
belong to the Arbor Day Society, I am not cheap when it comes
to trees. I try to plant at least a dozen trees on my property
every year although they aLe seedlings, they keep growing. But
that's as far as the landscaping and the easement across the
back, that's that would be our property. That would not be the
City's responsibility to mow that or take care of that, but it
is an easement for the city to go on to that property and to
take care of any piping or drainage or anything else that would
be necessary.,,
I
F
FY
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 19
Al Meloco (continued): "As far as meeting with the homeowners,
i think 1 did my homework there. I've met with them three
times. I came down from Philadelphia. Maybe they want to call
me a big city boy or whatever, but unfortunately. I live in the
Philadelphia area. I met with them and discussed the problems
of noise, pollution, trash, landscaping, traffic
maneuverability and everything else and I think we met everyone
of their questions. We worked on it diligently. if an
individual was to buy a home in anywhere along there with the
wall and the landscaping that is going to be put in there, it's
not going to depreciate their homes, number one. Number two,
the landscaping is going to be of a nature that it'll be if
' anything it will add to their homes. If I just may...."
E Mayor Stephens: "You have one minute left."
Al Meloro: "Okay, if I )ust may add, we even asked them if
they would like to have vines growing on their side of the
property so I think. I realize that a homeowners interested in
the value of their horses and just because we're "large city
multi- million dollar organization and we have top guns" that's
not what I want. I want these people to shop at our store.
It's a service that is needed in the area. it's a service that
is zoned for the .............and that is my rebuttal."
f
4 Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Mr. Meloco. Any questions the
Council might have for Mr. Meloro? At this time I'll declare
the public hearing to be closed and call upon the City Manager
to direct the presentation by his staff."
Unidentified: "Mr. Mayor, can we have time to say something?"
I
Mayor Stephens: "No sir, the public hearing is closed. We
have we gave several calls to fore and several calls for the
opposition and I presumed that everyone in the audience who
desired to speak has had a full opportunity to do so. The
public hearing is closed. At this time the council, the City
Manager will direct the presentation by his staff."
Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager: "Yes, Mr. Mayor, let me call
on our Executive Director foe Planning, Mc. Robbins to make the
staff presentation."
Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning: "Mayor and
Members of the Council, this is a request to continue the
zoning process on a 1.72 acres of land specifically where the
request for approval of a detailed plan is shown on the slide.
The Staff has been processing this case based on a zoning
ordinance that I'll show you a slide or an amendment to our
zoning ordinance in pact that reads as shown on this slide,
This pact of the ordinance was effective on May 20, 1986, in
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
` s September 5, 1989
Page 20
Frank Robbins (continued): "which for PD's and we believe this
property is zoned Planned Development for PD's approved before
May 1986 a detail plan or a concept plan must be approved by
the Council. If it did not meet the a ordinance requirements
as stated in 1986, or the information required on concept or
detail plans, a an additionally that no development had
occurred then you'd have to process the site plan as any other
zoning case if those two conditions were met. A the bottom
part of this slide is another section of the zoning ordinance
that describes the situation in which if the site plan, the
planned development site plan is less than 10 acres, then a
detailed plan is required. And this is less than 10 acres."
"A little bit on the history. We can go into more detail if
' you like under questions. to 1969, a site plan was adopted by
Council ordinance No. 69-35 and this is in your backup
beginning on page 4-1. Since 1969, or since 69 ordinance 69-35
was adopted, the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City
h Council have approved six site plans within PD6 without
ordinances. Beginning in 1981, the Council approved four
zoning cases two of which were detailed plans by ordinance
within PD6. This is the second application for a site plan
approval in this area. A the first site plan which was
reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission a was
recommended for denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission on
October 19th, 1988. A it was scheduled for a review by the
City Council. Council postponed until December the 13th, 1989,
at which time the applicant withdrew this site plan from
considecat-ion. Subsequent to the time, the applicant has
submitted a different sit plan and we've gone through the same
` process with the Planning and Zoning Commission, held public
and hearings and so forth. Then on May 10th, 1989, Planning
and Zoning Commission considered the new site plan and approved
this site plan. 1'11 go back to these numbers later on. This
is the same site plan that we had up initially. A the council
was to initially consider this site plan on July 11th, 1989, at
that time the applicant requested it be postponed and Council
agreed to that postponement and it is scheduled for our
discussion tonight."
"Since the Planning and Zoning Commission made their
recommendation on May 10th, we have received opposition from
landowners that own more than 20% of the land within 200 feet
of Block A, Lot 4A, Phase II which is the site which we are j
considering tonight. About 24%. a little over 24% of the area
within 200 feet or the area shown in red on this slide, owners
of property have opposed this rezoning since the Planning and
zoning Commission. And if I might, I don't want to reiterate
everything in the Staff report, I would like to go back and
make note again of the changes that have been made to the site
plan since the once the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended denial and which they recommended approval of." {
1
i
h
r
2
F
City of Denton city council minutes
` September 5, 1989
Page 21
Frank Robbins (continued): "Item kl reflects the fact that the
It bay doors now face IH35. Your backup includes two noise
studies that have been provided by the applicant. Number 2,
there is a retaining wall on the. do 1 have a folder of the
opposition? The letters? No, sic."
I'F Mayor Stephens: They are not necessarily the opposition,
Frank. Normally, you have the reply forms."
Frank Robbins: "Yea air, I don't have the reply forms with me."
Mayor Stephens: "Why not?"
Frank Robbins: "I just don't have them. I could go get them,
I don't have them in hand right now."
E Mayor Stephens: "That's what you normally circulate."
i~ Frank Robbins: "Yes, air. I understand."
Mayor Stephens: "Let's see if we can continue that practice."
Frank Robbins: "Yes sir. Numbor two is a retaining wall on
the east side in two locations. First the retaining where the
number 2 points to but as well as this retaining wall and this
area have been added. The area in the reat of the building is
now heavily landscaped and no vehicular access is allowed in
j that area now according to that site plan. The masonry wall is
eight feet high. The previous height with the previous site
plan was six feet. The dumpsters were in the rear. Now
they're facing IH35. Number five, the sign is a much smaller
sign than the one that would be allowed for a sign according to
our sign for sign size and height that would be allowed by the
sign ordinance. This sign would be 15 feet high no larger than
150 square feet. The Sign ordinance if this weren't done by a
PD would allow a sign 250 square feet in size. Lighting
standards have been added since the site plan was last viewed
by the Planning and Zoning Commission and no parking will be
allowed on the access road. This is a Fire lane. And that
concludes my presentation. I am prepared to answer any of your
questions."
Mayor Stephens: "Thank you, Mr. Robbins. Any questions, yes
Mc. Boyd."
1 Council Member Boyd: "A one of the questions we had from one
I i of the speakers earlier wis that they'd been promised them a
fence earlier that had not been done and actually that's been
one of my pet peeves since I've been involved working with the
City that periodically we do hear, periodically we do hear of a
promise that, P&Z, Historic Landmark commission or at council
that later doesn't seem to be enforceable and you know we this
is what we intend to do, and based on that the City agency
approves it. What is the mechanism and what reason do we have
to believe that the fence, sign and lighting promises that are
being made here will actually be fulfilled if this is approved?"
6
ti
S
S '
I
1
I ~
' City of Denton City Council Minutes
III September 5. 1989
Page 22
Frank Robbins: If, because they are shown on this site plan.
A some of those restrictions are also part of the what were
called development standards that would be attached to this
be approved
enforced as any ordinance other
ordinance approved and would
would detail be plan zoand ning if
zoning violation or problem would be enforced."
Council Member Boyd: "Okay."
Frank Robbins: "In other words, you're adopting a zoning
standard when you adopt this site plan."
Council Member Boyd: "Now I'd also heard mentioned at an I
earlier meeting and maybe this is no longer pact of the
Boys had
hours of operation q bestmodified e somewhat y ands that citizens
agreed to do that. Is that now no longer pact of the proposal?"
Frank Robbins: "It was never part of the proposal that is it
was not pact of the application there was no mention of it on ;
the site plan was not part of the applicants submitted
development standards. So that issue is not part of the would
not be pact of the ordinance."
I
Mayor Stephens: "Mr. Alexander."
V
Council Member Alexander: "I'd like to address the question of
thz cement fence at the back of the property. If we look at
the site plan what we see is the designation of the fence there
at the back of the property, but there is discussion and my
understanding pact of the agreement that's being developed that
if indeed this were to be approved that that fence would be
extended all the way down to the drainage ditch behind
Mervyn's. Now my question is, is what's the legal status of
that commitment if indeed it does not show as such on the site
plan that is formally before us? I think we need to be sure we
have addressed that to everyone's satisfaction so that we're
sure we understand the realities that we are coping with here."
Frank Robbins: "One of the attachments to the ordinance is t
legal description and that legal description describes the area
within which the zoning ordinance is standards of detail plan
would be applied and that fence is not part of is not within
that legal description except on the lot itself, in other
words, the fnot, the
ordinance
requirement to build that thawas being t fence is snot spart earlier iyour is
1 at this time.
Council Member that think wbefore
awe
to address s th tha
vote here this evening."
i
11
1
1
a ti
i
i
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 23
Mayor Stephens: "Well, actually, it's more the lawyer. I
understand that the lawyer has been intending to bring in such
wording and has not."
Frank Robbins: "That's all I can say, mayor, is that we do not
have said wording. We had, we had discussed it, but...."
Mayor Stephens: "that's not part of the proposal at this time."
Frank Robbins: "That is correct."
Mayor Stephens: "..because it's not In writing as part of the
ordinance. That's a good point to be made."
Council Member Alexander: "Well, I want that to be addressed
before I vote tonight in very clear terms."
Mayor Stephens: "In very clear terms."
Council Member Alexander: "Mr. Weatherall's made reference to
it and I want to make sure that we have a clear commitment in
the tainutes one way or another on that."
I
Council Member Boyd: „t would also like to understand not only
that point but also what if any commitments should be made on
the hours of operation."
j Mayor Stephens: "Okay. Why don't you go ahead and see what
f I else you might have, Any other questions for hours of
operation and fence. Any other questions for Mr. Robbins while
he is at the microphone. Also, Mr. Robbins, Mr. Weddle had a
question earlier about muffler exclusion. I...I wasn't trying
to stop his question from being answered I thought there was a
time and place for things and this is the time, If a did you
hear his question concerning the exclusion of muffler i
h operation? Would you care to answer that please."
I Frank Robbins: "Yes. I think the issue relates to how the
various ordinances that have been adopted as they relate to
-J PD's and specifically this PD apply. ordinance 69-35 adopted a
provision that essentially said that the that the requirements
of a of a like zoning, like zoning district that the
requirements of a like zoning district would apply. There in
1969 there was an office zoning district but there is no
district called only retail. There was a general retail
district, a neighborhood service district, commercial and so
forth but here was no specific retail district. A in the
commercial district the muffler, seat cover use was authorized
not in any of the districts below the commercial district, that
is it was not authorized in neighborhood service, it was not
authorized in general retail, but was authorized in the
commercial zoning district. I don't know whether I've muddied
the waters or clarified it, any more for you."
1
1
1
1
l
(
City of Denton City council Minutes
September 5. 1989
Page 24
Mayor Stephens: ,Mr. Weddle, you understand? You asked the
question?"
Royce Weddle: "No. The question is, why is it called
(inaudible)"
Frank Robbins: "I can't answer....."
Royce Weddle: "(inaudible)"
Frank Robbins: "t don't know that mufflers was picked on. The
issue is what what standards would you apply and I'm responding
to the to the issue that if the because the the way the 69-35
ordinance is written it said that the standards of like
districts would be applied. We went back and researched a use
that would be done by Pep Boys. one of those would be to
change muff lece. That's not authorized in the general retail
and neighborhood service district, only authorized in
commercial and commercial is not a word that was used on the
site plan adopted in 69-35. The two words that were used are
retail/office.
Mayor Stephens: "Okay"
Unidentified Female: "(Inaudible speaking)"
Mayor Stephens: "Well, that's another issue. And he raised
the question... what I'm trying to do is not to introduce new
information at this time...."
i Unidentified Female: "(Inaudible speaking)eame thing why
are they being allowed that?"
Mayor Stephens: "Well...."
Frank Robbins: "I can't...I can't respond to that Mayor."
Unidentified Female: "I mean what's good for one is good for
the other...... (inaudibls)"
Unidentified Male: "(inaudible)"
Unidentified Female: "inaudible)"
9 Mayor Stephens: "Well, okay, just a minute. Ooooo. Okay. At
this time there was a couple questions that, I believe that
were that the Council as I understand want Mr. Weatherall to
address."
Council Member Alexander: "That's right."
t Mayor Stephens: "And if he would come to the microphone
because our,,.our uhm recorder doesn't pick up that tar away.
so it you would a would you speak only to the hours of
operation and the fence question please."
Ir low
5
V .
,
A
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 25
George Weatherall: "I would like to make a something clear 1
here. If it's not already a part of the proposed ordinance, 1
whatever means is necessary to make it a part of the proposed
ordinance, we would like two conditions to be attached to this
proposal. One is that muffler work will be excluded from this
particular Pep Boys facility. Whatever needs to be done to get
that in the ordinance, we would like that to happen. Number
I two...." f
` Mayor Stephens: "Our attorney is going to address how that 1
I' would be done to "
George Weathorall: "Fine."
Mayor Stephens: "her satisfaction when
i you Einish...,
George Weatherall: "In addition..." i
Mayor Stephens: "all of these points you raise. Okay?"
i
George Weatherall: "in addition to that, we also want another
condition included with respect to the fence. We've said that
we would have this fence built to the drainage channel. We'd
like that included in the ordinance. What we want is a a
confidence from all parties involved that these promises will
be kept and and something that is enforceable. Those are the
two conditions that we would like included in the ordinance."
i
Mayor Stephens: "What about the hours of operation?"
George Weatherall: "The hours of operation, we would like to
leave as as previously stated."
Mayor Stephens: "What is that nine to nine? So you're nine to
line is that what I'm seeing here?"
r
Unidentified Male: 118:30 to 9:00
George Weatherall: "8:30 to 9:00 p.m. One other thing that
probably should be added too is that the initial thing to
happen here would be the construction f this wall. I would
like that included in the ordinance. Before any construction
begins on the building, the wall will go up first."
i Mayor Stephens: "Ms. Harkins has a question about the fence.
I believe he answered that didn't he?"
Harold Harkins: "No, (inaudible)... behind Wolfe's. Does it
stop at Wolfe's..."
Mayor Stephens: "Oh, I see."
Harold Harkins: "(inaudible)"
s 1
2
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5. 1989
Page 26
George Weatherall: "Yes maam. It stops at the corner of the
Wolfe Nursery property that abuts Pep Boys."
Harold Harkins: "(inaudible)"
George Weatherall: "Y6s maam."
Harold Harkins: "(inaudible)"
Unidentified Female: "(inaudible)"
Mayor Stephens: "Well, we're the microphone just won't pick up
that far back. I'm sorry. We want everything to be on record
here."
Harold Harkins: "In other words (inaudible)"
f
E Mayor Stephens: "Well, I guess, the answer is yes. All
right. Mr. Weatherall,....'
George Weatherall: "That's correct."
f
Mayor Stephens: "Anything further you want to add?"
George Weatherall: "That's it."
Mayor Stephens: "That's it. Madam Attorney, uhm I believe we
had a question of Council Members that everything be wrapped up
here before they vote. What would you require then to make
this, should it pass, to make it a mandatory thing or a
condition would ...to be included in the main motion if someone
makes the motion to that effect a with those conditions would
that have the force that I heard expressed here that would be
desired as a well condition that a motion to approve this
request would include those fence and muffler questions."
/I Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney: "Thank you, Mayor. Uhm the
quite frankly, I would like if there was an intent on the part
of the Council an opportunity to write some language to
incorporate any such suggestion. This is one reason why this
was brought up six weeks ago when I asked if there was such an
intent that we be provided a letter outlining that. A...the
one thing I will say, to be quite honest, there is some, there
could be a question on down the line about the enforceability
of offsite improvements ouch as this. if it were not
constructed. I understand that in previous zoning cases
involving adjacent property, that promises were made. Those
promises were not include in the ordinance and, or alleged
promises, I'm sorry I wasn't here at the time, but what was
f represented to me.... anyway, we can certainly write language to
that effect for the ordinance, but I did want you to know that
it le, it would be subject the fence requirement could possibly
City of Denton City Cuncil minutes
t o
September S. 1989
Page 27
Debra Drayovitch (continued): "be subject to challenge and I
of othatfparthi ticularcrega thavetr,made
have that pequest sto that advised
applicant has represented it, it is willing and able and would
Of any necessary
construct such a
permits. A...that fence
go is r long way towards issuance enforceability." to the Mayor Stephens: "Any further questions the Council might have
of staff."
Council Member Alexander: "Question."
Mayor Stephens: "Yes, Mr. Alexander."
Council Member Alexander: "Did 1 understand the attorney to
say that you need time to write that in the ordinance or can
„
you....
Debra Drayovitch: "well....."
Council Member Alexander: l hertonightite that in the language based
on intent of o l
Debra Dtayovitch, wording be approved on a matter such aswthis by the require
don't think the muffler use language will be hard. However.
I'm hearing discussion even in the audience about points, a, as
far as the fence. If somebody has a a description drawn up or
enough.,,Council to be
thaI would t language certainly
specificwant
or a
satisfied language
Mayor Stephens: "Ms, Hopkins."
take then what
Council Member Hopkins- "Might
us? I To s go t on and Attorney
would be her suggestion to the vote
representing these changes that we would require and that I
would feel this whole Coun us bwou ackd thet ordinanced with the
then in two weeks bring ~
language? Can we do that? Can tonight's vote tell you what to
do and then you bring us back the ordinance with the wording to
be approved officially?" I
ood suggestion. Like
Debra Drayovitch: "That, that's a very 4
I said i don't have problem with the sale and installation of
muf conc properrspecificlconditiontrega ding the fe ce8bout drawing up
Mayor Stephens: "Yes, Ms, Hopkins,'
"I might just add for the audience
Council Member Hopkins.
that one reason we want to give this time. We have been, the
Council has been remiss in the past in asking for specific
1
I
s
~I
r
yxJ
1[r L
I
F City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 28
Council Member Hopkins (continued): "legal wordage or to
III change something that night and then it doesn't exactly come
out right or it didn't say what we thought it did and she's
been put on the spot because it had to be done rapidly. That
was the reason for that question."
Mayor Stephens: "Any further comments or questions. Yes, Mr.
Alexander."
Council Member Alexander: "1 have another question for Mr.
Robbins. If this site plan were to be approved tonight and
indeed the fence is clearly included in that site plan
regardless of whether we added the other language or not, we're
talking about specifically now the fence included in the site
plan as presented on the screen. What are the requirements for
maintenance of that fence over time? How can that be
enforced? Are there any provisions that we can utilize as a
city to enforce those requirements?"
I
Frank Robbins: "Sure. If It's, if it's a required, in this
case wall or arty other kind of development, it would be part of
a detail plan that we would appro.e that would have to be
maintained and if it became dangerous or fell down and just
failed to serve the purpose for which we intended or
thought... Intended it to be at the time we approved the
ordinance, it would be a zoning violation."
i
Council Member Alexander: "Okay, it would be a zoning
violation and could be enforced as such in that context."
i
Frank Robbins: "That is correct."
Council Member Alexander: "Can that be incorporated, Madam
Attorney, into the remainder of the fence that is not a part of
i this site plan as presented here tonight? Because I worry
about the technical aspects there, too."
Debra Drayovitch: "We can require, or the City Council can
require anything by an ordinance. A... again, I wouldn't know
the caveat that I earlier stated."
Mayor Stephens: "Okay. Any further comments, questions. What
is the pleasure of the Council concerning....'
Council Member Boyd: "Let me ask...."
V Mayor Stephens: "...this item, Yes sir."
Council Member Boyd: "...as a point of information. A, what,
a, was the attorney's recommendation with regards to voting on
this before we have precise language?"
i
I 1
f
City of Denton city council minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 29
Debra Drayovitch: "Council Member Boyd, prior to I think your
election as council Member in planned development zoning
ordinances this is exactly what the Council used to do. 1
think that Mayor Stephens and Council Member McAdams will
remember. The Council would vote in principal on an ordinance
that was a, I know this isn't a complex ordinance, but
sometimes the larger Planned Developments were, and direct the
City Attorney to prepare the appropriate instrument to bring
back at the next meeting. And that practice does have
precedent. A...."
Council Member Boyd: "Okay. At that point, if the language
was unsuitable..."
i
Debra Drayovitch: "That's correct."
I
Council Member Boyd: ,...it (inaudible)"
Debra Drayovitch: "But you satisfied your legal requirement
for a public hearing and a generally the the while it's not
binding, the original vote has always been followed. Given
minor differences in or variations in working out the wording
on a particular section. Does that answer your question?"
Council Member Boyd: "Yes, it does."
Mayor Stephens: "Okay, what is the pleasure of the Cite
Council concerning this proposal for a Planned Development in
this particular detail plan for 1.77 acres adjacent to Wolfe
l Nursery otherwise knows as the Pep Boys proposal? Do you need
additional...."
Council Member McAdams: "Mr. Mayor, in order just to provide
some noise? I will move denial of the request."
1I Mayor Stephens: "We have a motion for denial, to there a
second?"
Council Member Hopkins: "Mayor Stevens...."
i
Council Member Ayer: "I'll second the motion.,,
Mayor Stephens: "A motion and a second. A motion for denial.
is there discussion by the Council?"
Council Member Gorton: "Mr. Mayor?"
Mayor Stephens: "Yes."
I
Council Member Gorton: "on a motion for denial, does that also
require the 20% rule or a simple majority?"
Mayor Stephens: "That's why we have a Parliamentarian here."
K
Py
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Sep'cember 5, 1989
Page 30
upb before.oviAshin many trying to thinY. if this has every come
this particular one, but I would assume that by default only a
majority would be necessary."
Mayor Stephens: M"Motion and a second for denial.
further discussion? it not, the Council will now vote." there
NOTE: THIS ENDS THE VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTION OF THE MINUTES.
The following ordinance was considered:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, PROVIDING
°OR THE APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DETAILED PLAN FOR 1.727 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE
1-35 SERVICE ROAD, ADJACENT TO WOLFE NURSERY;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
$2000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Ayer seconded denial of the requeut. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "nay," Gorton
"nay," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye."
Motion carried with 5-2 vote.
B. The Council held a public hearing and considered
1 adoption of an ordinance amending Appendix B-Zoning of the Code
tofprthe ovide City forfreDenton. gulationseXfor by adding
Article 28B ordinances
Historic District, including architectural, sign, and parking
zoning regulations Commission rstoric ecommend approval~jmiesion and Planning and
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mike Cochran, Chairman of the Historic Landmark Commission,
spoke in favor of the ordinance. The Commission felt that this
ordinance would fine tune the Historic District's ordinance to
provide for codified regulations in this area. Problems that
corrected explained in the
had been had Council and
deficienciesdeofil
the Work Session h the
ordinance.
I' No one spoke in opposition,
I I The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The following ordinance was considered:
14
-1 7
s
{
'
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 31
NO. 89-110
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX B-ZONING OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ADDING A
NEW ARTICLE 28B TO PROVIDE FOR REGULATIONSINCLUDING FOR HE
OAK-HICKORY HISTORIC DISTRICT.
ARCHITECTURAL, SIGN, AND PARKING REGULATIONS:
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF
SEVERABOILITYO CLAUSE AT AND PROVIDING FORV AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
coil vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
I Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
„aye," Motion carried unanimously.
C. The council held a public heating and considered
a resolution adopanng amended for the
Plan"Deforn thee1Denton
Plan; adopting
Deve
Planningeand pZoningacommission recommendedeadoption.jate. (The
j The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Chairman of the Appendix A Task
j Bill Claiborne, 820 Smokecise,
spoke in favor of the resolution. The Denton
Force,
Development Plan had a Concept Map which defined three areas of
development; low intensity, moderate activity centers, high
activity centers. The Task Force addressed the technical areas
of the Concept Map. The resolution addressed the criteria used
in developing the specific area maps and the maps themselves.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The following resolution was considered:
NO. R89-054
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN APPENDIX A FOR THE DENTON
DEVELOPMENT PLAN: ADOPTING AN AMENDED "CONCEPT MAP"
FOR THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
Hopkins motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the res l do n.
j On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," opkins "aye,
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
I
V low
,I
t
fi
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
I~ Page 32
h Council Member Ayer expressed the appreciation of the Council
to the Appendix A Task Force for the monumental job they had
performed.
III D. The Council held a public hearing and considered
a resolution amending the Denton Development Plan by deleting
multi-family and high density housing developments as being
eligible for Intensity bonuses, and providing for an effective
date. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended
adoption.)
, The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Harry Persaud, Senior Planner, spoke in favor of the
resolution. The Denton Development Plan approved in September
of 1988 contained a policy which allowed for an intensity bonus
to be granted for multi-family development. The intention was
that the bonus would only be granted for community facilities,
public office spaces, parks, etc. T'se Appendix A Task Farce
felt that multi-family would no longer be included in the list
eligible for the bonus.
Mitchell Turner, 2118 Stoneview, spoke in favor of the
resolution. As a member of the Appendix A Task Force, he felt
that the only thing bonuses would be granted for is for open
space or community facility.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The following resolution was considered:
R89-055
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN BY
DELETING MULTI-FAMILY AND HIGH DENSITY HOUSING
'I DEVELOPMENTS AS BEING ELIGIBLE FOR INTENSITY BONUSES,
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the resolution.
On roll vote, McAdams aye, Alexander aye, Hopkins aye,
Gorton "aye," Ayer 'lays, 11 Boyd "aye," and Mayo. Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously,
E. The Council held a public hearing regarding the
adoption of the proposed 1989-90 tax rate.
it
I ,
1
I
T-W
2
c
City of Denton city council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 33
Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager, presented an overview for both
the tax rate and the program of services. The proposed tax
rate of .6240 was a little over a three cent increase in the 1
proposed budget devoted to public safety type needs that had
been articulated by the Council. The increase would bring in a
little over $400,000. The various patrol officers,
communication dispatchers, the first narcotics unit of the
City, and an expansion of of the DAPF program would be funded
from the earmarked two cents of the increase. The remaining
1.12E increase would bring the City even with this year because
of lost valuation.
Mr. Harrell reported the the budget called for the expenditure
of $122,332,279 for all funds of the City compared to this
year's adopted budget of $119,937,684 or slightly less than a
2% Increase in the total City budget. This was a status quo,
hold-the-line budget with the exception of public safety.
' The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mitchell Turner, 2118 Stonegate, spoke in opposition to the tax
increase. Taxpayers had been asked to fund seventeen new staff
positions and a $435,000 salary increase package. Mr. Turner
j stated that when people and businesses of this City were not y
prospering, Staff should not ask for more. Mr. Turner felt
that this was not the time to be increasing City taxes in real
dollars. Mr. Turner felt that no conscious effort had been
made to keep taxes down even during the time of our City's i
prosperity. Mr. Turner offered some specific requests and
suggestions. Mr. Turner felt that the increase in City staff
was out of line. He felt the City Staff should be reorganized
from top to bottom along with a hiring freeze, no new positions
and without a reduction in City services. Mr. Turner felt that
there should he no salary Increases. He also felt tht O1S
computer system should result in a reduction of personnel
costs. Mr. Turner questioned the need for a new vehicle
maintenance facility, and the increase in the economic
development budget expenditures. Mr. Turner felt the budget
was a good budget for the Staff but not for the taxpayers, Mr.
Turner requested that the Council hold the tax rate to the
effective rate of .60601,
Council Member Randall Boyd commented that the figure Mr,
} Turner recommended the City use and the figure recommended to
Council by staff represented the increase proposed in law
enforcement. Mr. Boyd questioned whether Mr. Turner thought
the City ought to be striving towards this goal.
1
1
2
d'
K
~ P
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 34
Mr. Turner replied that he was suggesting a zero personnel head
count Increase and reorganizing the staff so that the 17
proposed positions in law enforcement could be accommodated.
Mr. Turner also questioned the need for 16 of the 17 proposed
new positions.
Council Member Hopkins stated she was In agreement with Mr.
Turner, and if at all possible, she did not want to see a tax
increase.
Council Member McAdams stated that she supported Council Member
Hopkin's feelings and felt the need to hold the line on taxes.
McAdams also stated that she felt that funding new positions
for one half year in a new budget year and an entire year in
the next budget year was not a good practice because it would
not give an accurate picture of the cost of the new person.
Ms. McAdams also felt that there may be a need to cut some
items or delay some programs in order to get the budget down.
Mr. Turner asked if the Council had taken a good look at what
the average cost of a new hire in this budget. It was $21,000
per year per new hive.
Council Member McAdams stated that the equipment and
enhancements that had been bought for City staff should be
making the staff more productive.
I
j Robert LaForte, 2917 Croyden, Chairman of the Public Utilities
Board and former Chairman of the Planning and Zoning
Commission, stated that the geographical information system was
more than a mapping system and necessary for planning for the
future. Mt. LaForte, pointed out a number of advantages of the
system throughout the City including Fire and Police response
time.
Council Member Alexander stated that he agreed with Mr. LaForte
and felt he had taken a very responsible but very conservative
position in support of the GIB system.
D.W. Edwards, 3005 Windy Hill and Controller for Peterbilt
Motors, stated that he felt Peterbilt Motors had been a
socially responsible business since locating in Denton. He
stated that Peterbilt Motors was very concerned with the tax
rates in the city and county of Denton for their business and
for their employees, Mr. Edwards questioned why there was a
need for a 1.12: increase for an eroding tax base and why was
there an eroding tax base. He also questioned if the tax bass
lowers would not the level of services also lower and what fine
tuning was needed to maintain coats.
i
4
t
4
1
i
S
f'
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 35
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, explained that the property tax
system in the state of Texas was divided into two parts. One
was a tax rate set by the taxing entity and secondly an
appraisal set by an independent tax appraisal agency outside of
the control of the city, school district or county. The
Appraisal Districts reported that the actual assessed value in
the City of Denton went down this year over what it had been
previously. We had a lower valuation in the community despite
the acdition of Ti and the expansion of Peterbilt. Without T[
and the Peterbilt expansion, the tax base would have been
substantially less. The primary reason given by the Appraisal
District was centered on apartments in the community which had
previously been valued on an income basis at the request of the
owners as opposed to a market value basis which was their
option. Vacant commercial property in town was also reduced in
value.
Harrell Mated that reducing City services was an option that
the Council had as they set the tax rate. When presenting the
preliminary budget to Council, Staff addressed major issues.
Some of the alternatives presented call for a reduction in
services. in response to concern for the burden placed on city
taxpayers, city staff had addressed certain line items in
City's General Fund budget eliminating approximately $421,000
worth of expenditures that the City had this year that were not
recommended to Council to continue next year.
Council Member Boyd asked how did Denton's decrease in tax base
compare to other areas of Denton County.
c
Harrell replied the there was no generalization that could be
made. Flower Mound had an increase. On the other hand, the
City of Lewisvillo had lost more valuation than Denton. Some
areas in Dallas County had lost considerable valuation.
Council Member Boyd stated that the City of Denton had found a
law enforcement program that was successful in meeting the
needs of the citizens in the C.O.P. program. However, to
expand or even to continue the present level of service would
cost more money.
Edwards stated that the Council must place a priority in where
they were going to spend money and perhaps adjust the level of
service somewhere else.
The Mayor declared the public hearing closed.
F. The Council held a public hearing regatding he
adoption of the proposed 1989-90 City of Denton Program of
Services.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
i
i
1
'j
L
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September S. 1989
Page 36
Edward Coomes, 809 Denton Street, asked the Council to try to
find $4,600 for the Denton County Prenatal Clinic to assist the
lonely and economically deprived citizens of Denton. The
servi:es of the clinic are provided almost totally by
volunteers.
Roberta Donsbach. Director of SPAN, spoke on behalf of SPAN'S
request for funding from the City of Denton for $38,000 for
senior services and $40,000 for Handi Hop transportation.
Senior services included door-to-door transportation for the
elderly, three meal sites in the city of Denton for elderly,
and social services for the fragile elderly. Ms. Donsbach
stated that there had been a tremendous surge in the number of
people eligible to use Mandl Hop in the last few years. Not
only did the $40.000 requested provide transportation, it also
was the local match for transit for the Section 18-Rural
Trai,sit Program. The moneys would also be used for the
trolleys which would be used to start the public transportation
program which had been worked on for several years.
Dorothy Domico, 1801 Panhandle, spoke as a member of the Human
Services Committee of the City of Denton in support of the
recommendations already made to Council for human services
funding. The Committee used the criteria outlined by the
Council. The list presented to the Council included the seven
1 agencies funded previously with fundamentally no changes and
added two new agencies.
Adrian Anderson, Executive Director of Ann Haven's Hospice,
stated that this agency had been very directly impacted by the
increase in medical expenses which everyone was facing. With
the economic conditions as they were, Ann Haven's Hospice had
increased demand for services. Ms. Anderson stated that they
had doubled in size since January.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Council recessed for a short break.
3. Council received a citizen's report from John McDonald
regarding access to property on E. McKinney.
P ± John McDonald, Route 11, Box 655, on East McKinney Street,
stated he had been a resident at this address since 1976 and
presented facts about the road easement in dispute. On Friday,
May 26, 1999, the City of Denton graded the said road in
question. In so doing, the City had taken additional footage
of Mr. McDonald's property which included dirt, grass, and rock
and also tore out two driveways put in for access to his
property - one on the east side of the road and one on the west
side of th^ road to his mother's residence. This action was
taken without Mr. McDonald's permission. Since that time, the
1
i J
i
I
a
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1999
page 37
driveway on the east side had been fixed, and the driveway on fence.
received pecmiseionofrome hifsixned. toDtie do thad o hecgopert
Before construction of the fence, Mr. McDonald had the Property Mr. rkald
surveyed. DEssatiofled neighbors north of Mme's
not furnished the proper legal documents
property had
of
concerning the easement of the road in 9U eCourthouse as these
documents were not recorded in the County
, 1989. The road in question had never been dedicated
August 3
as an official County road.
Mr. McDonald stated that the City of Denton Fire Department had
co erty on the 20 foot
no problem with access utto the
ility andiwastepdisposal trucks had no
easement. Also. ma the properties in question. Mc. McDo nald
problem accessing o access to the residents an
never stated that would
businesses located north of his property
arol 4 Council received petition from C
City of Denton-
a curfew institution of
the
Carol Kelly, 2401 Kingston Trace, stated that she would like to
petition the council for a curfew for the children of Den o .
felt a curfew of 11
3 Because of increased vandalism, Ms. Kelly
B e the children
p£m t forchilddrn naunder 1 toolul In pwhich tokeep ice thesae nd parents
j under control.
i Item 7.B. was moved ahead in the agenda order.
7. B. The Council
nsstreet betweenl Alice street tand of a temporarily closing Congress
Denton street on Friday, October 20, 1989.
The following resolution was considered,.
NO. R89-057
q AND
A. TEMPORARILY BEET 20ETw19s AL
STREET AND DENTON
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
the
Eleanor tsmart 3000 Montecito, stated that she represented ed fall
Calhoun PTA which had opted to have Cougar Day" inf Calhoun
this year. They requested that the block In t[ont o
lice and Denton street be close on
Ali
from 3 to 7 P.M. in the interest of the
J"4nioCougc "Cougar High DaY School between
f
safety of the students.
1
i
S
{
J
r
i
i
I
City of Denton city council minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 36
I
Hopkins motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the
resolution. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,"
Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
Regular agenda order was resumed.
5• Consent Agenda
Hopkins Motioned, McAdams seconded to approve the Consent
Agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid #9998 - Asbestos Removal at Power Plant
2. Bid #1002 - Transformers
6. Ordinances
A. The council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or
services.
' The following ordinance was considered:
i
No. 89-111
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE: AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motioned, McAdams seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bide and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
The following ordinance was considered:
i
NO. 89-112
i
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING j
FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
1
or low
i rv
R
c
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5. 1989
Page 39
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye." Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye,' and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
designating and establishing speed zones on State Highway FM
426 (McKinney Road) from northbound U.S. Highway 77 (Locust
Street) to eastern city limits for a distance of 5.151 miles;
providing for a penalty of a fine not exceeding two hundred
- -1 dollars ($200.00); providing a severability clause; and r
declaring an effective date. (Citizens Traffic Safety Support
Commission recommended approval.)
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the last time
this ordinance was presented to Council the suggestion from
Traffic Safety was for a little higher speed limit in the area
of Mack Park and the new subaivison near Mack Drive. At
Council's request, staff tested the area and Traffic Safety
supported the recommendation of a reduced speed to 35 m.p.h.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 89-113
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING SPEED ZONES
ON STATE HIGHWAY FM 426 (MCKINNEY ROAD) FROM
NORTHBOUND U.S. HIGHWAY 77 (LOCUST STREET) TO EASTERN
CITY LIMITS FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.151 MILES; PROVIDING
FOR A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT EXCEEDING TWO HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($200.00); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," {
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the City
of Denton, Texas, and Fciends of the Family, Inc., to provide
f assistance for abused women and children; authorizing the
j expenditure of funds therefore; and providing an effective date.
Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager, reported that this was the
second step in implementing the homeless grant which was I
acquired by the City.
The following ordinance was considered:
1
1
r
t
I
w
IL
City of Denton city Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
M Page 40
t NO. 89-114
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS AND FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY,
INC., TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN;
AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye." Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
of the City of Denton. Texas, amending Section 4-5 of the Code
of Ordinances; establishing the Animal Shelter Advisory
Committee; prescribing the duties therefor; prescribing
qualifications terms and f. • renumbecing renumbering
the remaining sections Of Article I of Chapter 4 of the Code:
and providing an effective date.
The following ordinance was considered:
i
NO. 89-115
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, AMENDING
{ SECTION 4-5 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; ESTABLISHING
E THE ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PRESCRIBING THE
DUTIES THEREFOR; PRESCRIBING QUALIFICATIONS AND TERMS
OF OFFICE; RENUMBERING THE REMAINING SECTIONS OF
ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 4 OF THE CODE; AND PROVIDING AN
j EFFECTIVE DATE.
Boyd motioned, McAdams seconded to adopt the ordinance filling
the the blanks as follows: five (5) members (the fifth member
to be a citizen, not involved by occupation or membership in
any of the above mentioned categories or groups), two (2)
members shall be appointed to serve a term expiring on June 30,
1990, and three (3) members shall be appointed to serve a term
to expire on June 30, 1991, to be determined by lot at the
first meeting. On roll vote, McAdams "aye." Alexander "aye,"
Hopkins aye, Gorton aye, Ayer aye, Boyd aye, and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
f amending Article I of Chapter 22 "Taxation" of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas amending section 22-2
relating to payment of taxes; repealing sections 22-3, 22-4 and
for repealing
effective dteordinances in
22-5 relating ewith;delinquent
providing taxes;
conflict t
I
i
n
pp~ r `
2
I
y ~ A
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 41
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 89-116
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 22
"TAXATION" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING SECTION 22-2 RELATING TO
PAYMENT OF TAXES; REPEALING SECTIONS 22-3, 22-4 and
22-5 RELATING TO DELINQUENT TAXES; REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt this ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," I
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
A
7. A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
approving the exchange of certain fire hose with the City of
Aubrey; and providing for an effective date.
The following resolution was considered:
NO. R89-056
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EXCHANGE OF CERTAIN FIRE HOSE WITH 1
THE CITY OF AUBREY: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Hopkins seconded to approve the resolution.
On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye." Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
B. Item 7.8. was considered eaclier in the meeting.
C. The Council considered approval of a resolution
authorizing the City Manager to execute a lease agreement
between the City of Denton and Ernest and Lewis Trietsch for
pcopecty located at the City of Denton Municipal Airport,
Denton, Texas and providing for an effective date. (Airport
Board recommends approval.)
Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that this was for the
agricultural lease at the Airport. This lease had peen
negotiated last year.
Council Member Ayer questioned if the rent had been paid for
the past year.
I
Svehla stated that the rent had been collected.
1
I
I
3
r
a ;
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 19s9
Page 42
The following resolution was considered:
NO. R89-058
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND ERNEST
AND LEWIS TRIETSCH FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CITY OF
DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, DENTON, TEXAS AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the
resolution. On roll vote. McAdams "aye,"
Hopkins "aye.,, Alexander "aye,"
Gorton aye, Ayer aye, Boyd "aye," and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
D. The council consider approval of a rESOlution
authorizing providing sewer service to property owned by
Muskett Corporation as described herein, and providing for an
effective date. (PUB and P&Z recommend approval.)
j R. E. Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that two
years ago the Love's Country Store on north I-35 requested to
tie into our sewer system. Since that area was certified to
the City of Denton, the City said yes pending Board and Council
approval. Love's would have to pay all costs for a pump
j station and a force main down to the City system. Love's had
delayed further action due to cost but had now decided to move
forward.
Council Member Gorton questioned if there would be a pro rata
charge for any other property owner who may want to tie into
this line.
Nelson stated that at the present time the City was not looking
at oversizing that line and were not locking at any pro rata
charges for anyone tieing into that line.
f
NO. R89-059
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PROVIDING SEWER SERVICE TO
PROPERTY OWNED BY MUSKETT CORPORATION AS DESCRIBED
f HEREIN: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Ayer seconded to a
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexanderro"aye he Hopkinsionaye0a
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
i
I
4 r
P
M1
I .
I`
f
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September S. 1989
Page 43
E. The council considered approval of a resolution
authorizing letter of intent by the cities of Bryan, Denton,
Garland and Greenville to sell electric power and energy to the
City of College Station. (PUB recommended approval.)
R. E. Nelson, Executive Director for utilities, stated that
this was the same letter the Council had seen about a month
ago. The document had undergone some revision in the other
cities but essentially was the same document.
NO. R89-060 ,
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, OFFERING THE SALE OF POWER AND
ENERGY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TOGETHER WITH THE CITIES
OF BRYAN, GARLAND AND GREENVILLE, BEGINNING IN 1992;
I AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded approval of the resolution.
On toll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." ?lotion carried unanimously. ~
I
F. The Council considered approval of a resolution
authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract between the
City of Denton, Texas and the Texas State Library for the i
i City's provision of library services to disadvantaged
populations; and providing for an effective date.
Joella Orr, Library Director, stated that this was a
continuation of the Outreach Program started at the Martin
Luther King Recreation Center last year which had great success.
NO. R89-061 1
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND THE
TEXAS STATE LIBRARY FOR THE CITY'S PROVISION OF
LIBRARY SERVICES TO DISADVANTAGED POPULATIONS; AND
' PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Hopkins seconded approval of the resolution.
On foil vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,"
Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens
"aye." Motion carried unanimously.
I
I
1
I
1
1
s
i
I City of Denton City Council Minutes
' September 5, 1989
Page 44
G. The Council considered aporting a resolution the City of Denton City Council su ppoctinq the introduction
of fire suppression legislation regulating buildings owned by
the State of Texas.
John Cook, Fire Chief, stated that previously he had reported
to Council his concern on the inability of the Fire Department
to enforce codes and regulate state owned buildings. Denton
had over 150 buildings owned by the State of Texas in the City
of Denton. The Texas Municipal League had asked for any
resolutions for consideration at this year's conference in
order to gear up for the next session of the legislature.
f NO. R89-062
A RESOLUTION OF THE C':': OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL SUPPORTING THE
INTRODUCTION OF FIF' SUPPRESSION LEGISLATION REGULATING
I BUILDINGS OWNED BY Tiff STATE OF TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN
k~ EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Alexander seconded approval of the
resolution. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,"
` Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
I
City Manager Harrell presented the following item:
1. The City Manager presented a review of the
remaining budget issues to be discussed on September 12, 1989.
All Staff had done at this point was make a listing of the
issues which the Council had indicated that would like to
receive further information. The Staff planned to address each
item in detail at the meeting on the 12th. The Manager stated
that Staff would be happy to address any other issue which the
Council so desired.
Council Member Gorton requested that the health insurance plan
be a specific item.
Mayor Pro Tem Ayer requested not only a listing of direct
contributions for economic development, but also indirect
1 contributions that could be included.
The Mayor requested that Staff provide details on the point Mr.
Mitchell Turner expressed that Lewisville had lowered their tax
rate. The Mayor had also requested a priority listing of items
j requested in the new budget.
1
I
I
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 5, 1989
Page 45
t
Harrell indicated that the list of requests for the new budget
year were located in the budget document and were ranked in
priority order.
8. There was no official action taken during the Work
Session Executive Session.
9, New Business
No items of new business were suggested by Council Members for
future agendas.
10. The Council then convened into the Executive session
to discuss legal matters (considered action in In Re: Flow,
_ Denton County vs City, All A1-Khafaii ve City and Struble vs.
C_1tv), real eetate and personnel/board appointments (considered
appointments to the Board of Adjustments, Building Code, Cable
TV Advisory Board, Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission,
Electrical Code Board, Human Services Committee, Main Street
Advisory Committee, Animal Shelter Advisory committee and the
North Texas Higher Education Authority).
The Council reconvened into open session and took the following
action:
A. The Council considered appointments to the Board y
of Adjustment, Building Code, Cable TV Advisory Board, Citizens
Traffic Safety Support Commission, Electrical Code Board, Human
Services Committee, Main Street Advisory Committee and Animal
Shelter Advisory Committee.
The following appointments were considered:
Cable TV
i I
Susan McGuire 1989-92 1
Building Code Board ~
Don Fletcher (move from alternate to full member) 1989-91
Human Services
I
Linda Holloway 1989-91
Sandy Kristoferson 1989-90
Electrical Code Board
E Trenton L. Williams 1989-90
I
1
J
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September S. 1989
Page 46
Citizens Traffic Safet Su ort Commission
Betty Burch
Gorton motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the
appointments. Gortonil "aye," vote. Ayer "aye,"aye." " Boyd "aye." and 'aye, Mayor 11 1
Hopkins "aye."
Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered appointments to the North
Texas Higher Education Authority.
The following appointment was considered:
North Texas Hiaher.Education Authority
` Reappoint Lindsay Keffer approved the 1
M
Gorton motioned, Alexander seconded to
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,
appointment. Gorton l ,aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor
StHopkins "aye•.." Motion carried unanimously.
ephens "aye ~
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:25
p.m.
t RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
I -
BETT~ Y WILLIAMS
DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON J
{
I ~
4703M
J
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 12, 1989
The City Council convened into Executive session at 5:45 p.m.
The meeting adjourned at 6:09 p.m.
The City Council convened into the Work Session at 6:15 p.m. in
the Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens, Mayor Pro Tem Ayer: Council
Members Alexander, Boyd, Gorton, Hopkins and
McAdams.
ABSENT: None
1. Hold a discussion with hotel-motel occupancy tax fund
recipients.
I ~
A. Denton Convention and Visitors Bureau
Bob Woodin presented the Convention and Visitors Bureau
budget. The budget requested $143,313 in funding for Fiscal
l Year 1989-90. Projected actual costs for 1988-89 were $1270111.
Council Member Gorton asked Mr. Woodin what impact freezing the
hotel-motel tax revenues in the budget at current levels for
the next three years would have on the Bureau.
i
Mr. Woodin responded that such a freeze would have a
substantial impact on Joanne Ballentine's ability to travel to
conventions to sell Denton as a site. The Bureau would be
negatively impacted by a freeze.
The Visitors and Convention Bureau's fiscal year was from
April 1 to March 31.
B. North Texas State Fair Association
Bob Powers presented the State Fair's budget. No major changes
from the 1988-89 budget.
Mayor St ,)hens asked about the responses the State Fair was
receiving from its mail out promotions.
Mr. Powers stated that the response from people interested in
livestock shows was very good.
Council Member Gor.to;i asked Mr. Powers what impact freezing the
hotel-motel tax revenues in the budget at current levels for
the next three years would have on the State Fair Association.
Mr. Powers responded that the Fair Association could not take a
budget cut. Most of the money was spent following up on leads
for possible fairgrounds users.
E
3
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 12, 1989
Page 2
Council Member Hopkins asked if the budgets met
requirements of the legislation the
.
John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance, responded that
they were technically acceptable, but he would have to confer
with the City Attorney about the travel budgets.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that Council must approve
the budgets under the new legislation.
The North Texas State Fair Association's fiscal year was from
January 1, to December 31.
i
C. Denton County Historical Foundation
Olen Kerslake
The budget for presented the Historical Foundation's budget.
from last year's budgeter 1
Of9 that reflec,ted 0 a $12,000 decrease
attributed to the fact the County was 12 $9,000
now paying sa00~ paying sala could be
$3,000 was a ries and
foundation. Mr.p Kerslake sstitede that tia hthreeQycado by he
rnefr eze tof
j hotel-motel tax revenues would not be a
I Foundation, problem for the
The Historical Foundation's budget year was from October 1 to
{ September 30. This reflected a recent change made by the
Foundation.
E D. Denton County Historical Museum
Barbara Hall ~i
activities, gave a slide presentation about the Museum's
V Lloyd Harrell asked about the Museum's request for $48,000.
i
Ms. Hall responded that the $8,000 increase was a part of the
reduction made by the Historical Foundation,
Council Member McAdams asked what impact a three-year freeze on
the revenues from the hotel-motel tax funds would have on the
Museum.
Norma Gamble responded the freeze would not have an impact
1 because of this year's $8,000 increase.
I The Historical Foundation's budget was from October 1 to
September 30.
E. Greater Denton Arts Council
Herbert Holl presented the budget for the Arts Council. This
was the second straight year the Arts Council finished in the
V
4
i
I
City of Denton city council Minutes
September 12, 1989
Page 3
black
The budget was a cautious one with regards to revenue.
Hotel-motel tax funds account for 259 of the Arts Council's
budget.
Council Member Gorton asked when the Performing Arts Center
might be open.
Mr. Holl responded that the Arts Council currently had $300,000
in hand, plus an additional $35,000 in commitments. The
remainder of the funds needed, approximately $40,000, would be
targeted in a capital campaign in the spring.
Lloyd Harrell asked if the Arts Council had repaid the loan it
took from the funds for the Performing Arts Center.
Mr. Holl replied that it had not been repaid, but the Arts
Council had every intention of repaying the 13,000.
The Arts Council's fiscal year was from July 1 to June 30,
f Mayor Stephens stated that the contracts would be formally
considered at next week's Council Meeting (September 19)1 and
that discussion on the matter would take place at thtt time.
I
Council Member Alexander asked if it would be an improvement
over the present situation if the Council gave the hotel-motel
tax recipients a firm number to budget from with a contingency
fund in case the revenues fell off. He also asked if it was
legal.
John McGrane replied that to do so would require a revision of
the contracts since they allocate the money on a percentage
basis.
Council Member Gorton stated that the percentage basis now used
makes accountability difficult for the Council. If revenues
top projections, could Council assign the money at its
discretion. There were other needs that this money could be
used for.
Council Member Alexander stated that while he was pleased with
what he had heard, he did not find allocating by percentages an
acceptable way of budgeting.
Council Member Ayer stated a concern about the Council's
ability to fulfill its obligation to the law if it allocated
the money by percentages.
2. Discussion of Budget Issues.
I
i
~L
1
City of Denton City council minutes
September 12, 1989
Page 4
Lloyd Harrell presented an overview of the proposed budget.
John McGrane distributed a sheet containing technical J1
corrections to the budget. Mr. McGrane then informed council 1
of his conversation with Mr. Edwards, Peterbilt Comptroller, II
concerning the City's budget. While Mr. Edwards brought up a
number of solid points, Staff and council had already
considered them and the impact they would have on operations.
Lloyd Harrell presented the pros and cons of the City's
involvement with the North Texas Commission. It was the
concensus of the Council to continue its membership.
Lloyd Harrell presented budget figures that showed the City's
contribution to economic development and economic development
related activities totaled $934,667 in this year's budget.
j
E
Library - the County's contribution was budgeted at $140,0000
i but the County had informed the City that it would be paying {
the City only $117,941 for fiscal year 1989-90. There was a
pledge to raise per capita funding by 250 next year.
Council Member Gorton asked what schedule was used by the
1 County in disbursing the funds. The answer was quarterly
R payments. Council Member Gorton then suggested that the
Library keep track of the use of the Library by non-City
residents of Denton County. '
Council Member Boyd asked if a charge would result in the end
i of use of the Library by County residents.
Joella Orr, Director of the Library, responded that there might
be a drop-off, but she was not sure of the extent. Ms. Orr
added that County residents account for about 24% of the
Library's users.
The recommendations of the Solid Waste Alternatives Committee
and their impact on the budget were then discussed.
Council Member Boyd asked if their action on the budget
presupposed the answer to the Committee's recommendation.
Lloyd Harrell responded that such action did not presuppose the
answer. The Council would still have the option of taking over
all services or charging a franchise fee on private haulers.
The elimination of an Urban Planner position and the savings to
the budget were then discussed.
Council Member McAdams expressed concern that if development
were to pick up again, the City would once again focus only on
development while long range plans were not made.
{
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 12, 1989
Page 5
Mayor Stephens thanked staff for finding places to cut the
budget.
Council Member McAdams asked how the work would be done with
less staff.
Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Community
Development, responded that the Planning Department would be
using the team approach with regards to assignments.
Lie Human Services Committee's funding proposal was the next
item considered. Mayor Stephens brought the Veteran's of r
Foreign Wars request for the funding of a van to the attention
of the Council. The van would be used to transport disabled
Veterans to and from VA hospitals in Dallas, Waco, and Bonham,
l Council Member Boyd asked if the criteria used by the Human
Services Committee had applied to this request. In all
fairness, the VFW's request should have gone through the
Committee.
i
Council Member McAdams stated that something would have to come
off the list before she could consider putting the van on the
list.
I
Council Member Alexander stated it would be unfair for the
Council to ask the Committee to look at a single request. If
it is to be considered, the Council should consider it.
I
Council Member McAdams stated that Handihop should not be cut
and that SPAN should be budgeted separately. It was not right
to have transportation competing with a prenatal clinic.
Council Member Ayer agreed that SPAN should become a separate
line item in the budget.
Mayor Stephens asked if separating SPAN from the Committee's
budget might have implications in the future as far as staffing
a transportation office was concerned.
Council Member Alexander stated that a transportation line item
was a good idea, but it might not be possible in this year's
budget. The committee's budget should be cut by the amount
awarded to SPAN.
Mayor Stephens stated that SPAN was a social service and should
be funded through the Committee.
Council Member Boyd stated that SPAN had changed and the
Committee had changed and this should be recognized in the
budget. Mr. Boyd then asked what Handihop's funding should
be. The $36,000 requested,actually keeps Handihop even.
1
-
ri
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
September 12, 1989
Page 6
Council Member Alexander suggested taking $1,000 from AIDenton
and Ann's Haven Hospice to bring Handihop to $36,000.
C
recoup Its expenses through coni sor, ouncil Member Gorton stated that Ann's Haven Hospice could
Medicare. It did not really needmmoneyyfromthetCiMydicaid and
Council Member Hopkins stated that she personally supported
Ann's Haven, but she did not believe the City should.
Council Member McAdams stated that since tax dollars were being {
used, the City should use them to do things for people that '
could not do for themselves.
Council Member Ayer stated that the prenatal clinic was not
funded, in part, because it was supported by Medicaid.
Dorothy Damico, Chair of the Human Services Committee, stated
that the prenatal clinic was not funded, in part, because of
the Flow case. In the Committee's opinion, Ann's Haven and
AIDenton were not health care.
The next item to be discussed was the automation of jail
~ r
I arraignments. A committee would study the issue and return to
j Council with recommendations.
Public safety was the next issue to be discussed. Council i
Member McAdams asked what District 102 was. Chief Jez
responded that it was Southeast Denton.
l
Dawn to dusk lighting was then discussed. Council Member
Hopkins stated that the change in rates from $6.20 a month to
$7.50 a month was not significant and that a person should pay
for the service he or she received.
The proposed pay plan adjustments were then discussed. Mayor
Stephens stated that the full 5% increases should not be so
easy to receive and that perhaps the city should took towards
revamping the system.
MivecAdrams that performance
She stated that
her concern was that the insurance increase could end up
j reducing a person's take-home pay.
Lloyd Harrell responded that the insurance situation had
changed somewhat and that it did not appear that anyone would
recewheiven take-me
I~
the insuranlece coverages
Cooncil Member Alexander stated that every employee must have
the opportunity to receive a-raise.
I
Ir 11W
3
6
1r V
`C 1
f
I
I
City of Denton city council minutes
September 12, 1989
Page 7
Health insurance options were then discussed. Council was
assured that this matter would be brought before them in
October anti that the start-up date would be December 1.
A tax rate comparison with the City of Lewisville was then
discussed. Over the past four years Denton's rate had risen
3 1/20 while Lewisville had gone up 70.
Other items:
Council Member McAdams stated she would like to see the City !
squeeze the budget a bit more. Specifically, she wanted to see
what would happen with a 1, 2, and 3 cent drop in the rate.
rr~ Council Member Ayer asked about the effects of cutting travel
by a specific percentage.
Council Member Hopkins stated that $100,000 should be cut from
the budget.
It was the concensus of the Council to reduce the Chamber's
economic development funding from $76,000 to $60,000 with the
i North Texas Commission dues coming out of the $60,000.
f There was some discussion concerning the cse of utility funds
being used for the Chamber's economic development efforts.
Council Member McAdams requested a legal opinion on the use of
utility funds.
i
F
j The City Council adjourned to Executive Session at 10:40 p.m.
I No official action was taken,
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Ii
f
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ROGER NELSON
DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
C 2707J
I '
11
1
i
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 3, 1989
The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m, in the
Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem Ayer: Council
Members Alexander, Boyd, Gorton, Hopkins and
McAdams.
ABSENT: Norte
1. The Council received a report on Coopers 6 Lybrand's
Management Study and Actuarial Audit of the City's Employee
Health Insurance Program and the preliminary recommendation on
the Employee Health Insurance Program.
Council Member Gorton left the meeting with a potential
conflict of interest. An affidavit of abstention was on file
j with the City Secretary.
i
Tom Klinck, Director of Personnel, reviewed the background
involved in the process of study for the health insurance fund,
including employee input, alternatives developed and the
analysis of those alternatives. The alternatives developed
were a three tiered City plan and a two tiered Sanus/New York
Life plan.
Dave Palatiere, Coopers 6 Lybrand, reviewed the process
involved in analyzing the two alternatives.
Klinck stated that staff was recommending the Sanus/New York
Life plan with the endorsement of the Employee Insurance
committee, a majority of the city employees, the Executive
l Staff, and Coopers 6 Lybrand. He then reviewed the plan design
and the rate structure for the two Sanus plans.
Mayor ?ro Tem Ayer asked what kind of a guarantee the City had
that the HMO would stay in business.
i
Klinck replied that there was no guarantee but that staff would
have to keep on top of the situation.
2. The Council held a discussion of proposed wastewater
treatment rates.
Council Member Gorton returned to the meeting.
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for utilities, stated that this
item had been considered at the Council meeting two weeks ago
I and that there had been some concern from the Restaurant
Association regarding the new rates. A meeting had since been
City of Denton City Council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 2
held with the Restaurant Association with a discussion of how
the rate schedule was developed. After that meeting, the
Public Utilities Board reviewed and accepted the staff
recommendation that the rate increase be phased in over a three
year period rather than a two year period. The item was on the
formal agenda for later consideration.
3. The Council held a discussion concerning the telephone
study interim report.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the study attempted to
determine the feasibility to purchase and install a new phone
system for about the same amount of money as the City was now
spending. Preliminary finding of the study indicated that it
was possible and bids had been taken for the system.
Gary Collins, Director for Data Processing, stated that formal
proposals had been received from General Telephone, Southwest
Bell, AT&T, and Rolm. indications were a price of
$600.000-$650.000 for the new service with a 6-8 year payback.
City of Denton Utility Department personnel could be used to
install the fiber optic system.
j 4. The Council held a discussion on suggested schedule
for budget review for summer 1990.
Mayor Stephens asked for suggestions for schedule dates for the
next year's budget.
Council Members discussed how to set up the budget schedule for
next year with suggestions on how to improve the sessions and
discussions with staff. Tentative discussion dates were set
for the second, third and fourth Tuesdays in September 1990.
5. Council held a discussion of the Lone Star Gas
Contracts.
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the
contracts were still being formalized and that they had been
withdrawn from the formal agenda. He presented an overview of
the contracts.
6. There was no Executive Session held during the Work
Session.
The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m.
In the Council Chambers.
I
f
TIN
R .4T;
? ~e
1
City of Denton city council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 3
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem Ayer; Council
Members Alexander, Boyd, Gorton, Hopkins and
McAdams.
ABSENT: None
Mayor Stephens prese,.tcA the following proclamations:
A. National Business Women-s Week
B. Computer Learning Month
C. Clean Denton Month
D. Public Power Week and Ene:
E. National Fire Prevention Week waandeNational Fire
Prevention Month
i
Council Member Gorton left the meeting.
Ik
1• The Council viewed the Denton economic development I
film produced by GTE.
Mel Willis, Acting Director-GTE, stated that the film Wes not
just a product of GTE but that many people had contributed to
the final product. He presented a copy of the film to the City w
and stated that additional copies were available to those ;
desiring a copy.
2. The Council held a
j public of an ordinance providing for a hearing cnange in conrjzoning ,
classification from single-family 7 to planned development and
approval of a detailed plan for 1.054 acres located at the
northwest corner of Welch and Fannin Streets. (The Planning
and zoning commission recommended approval). Z-89- 011
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Robert Cunningham, representing Chi Omega, stated that the
petitioner desired to build a sorority house on the property.
His firm had done many of that type of building and felt that
the pcoperty's size and location was ideal for a sorority
hoose. He had worked closely with the City staff to develops
the plan that was submitted and also with the University of
North Texas and tad presented the plan to the Planning and
Zoning Commission. lie had support of all three of those groups
and had also sent letters to the neighbors requesting input
I dealing with any concerns they might have. A concern had been
expressed regarding packing and based on his firm's experience,
there was more than adequate packing for the development.
I
C
i
}
City of Denton City Council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 4
Jane Moynagh, President of the House Corporation-Board of
Directors-Chi Omega, presented background information of the
Chi Omega Sorority. Concerns expressed by staff included 1
increased traffic in the area and compatibility with the 1
neighborhood. As the house would be close to the University,
the residents would be able to walk to classes and not increase
traffic in the area. The structure would be a residential-like
structure that would enhance the area and add to tt.e value of
the property.
Eddie Lane, speaking for Jewell Nichols-a property owner in the
area, stated that Ms. Nichols had the following concerns: (1)
the back part of her property would be zoned for a sorority
house and the front part of her property was being used as a
right-turn lane, (2) the sorority house would be zoned planned
development and all of the other property was single family,
(3) there would not be adequate parking for the sorority, (4)
there were no guidelines for sororities by either the City or
the University. ,
The petitioner was granted a five minute rebuttal.
I ~
Ms. Moynagh stated that Ms. Nichols property did not directly
j I adjoin the proposed property, there were differences between a y
sorority house and a fraternity house and the sorority house
had national standards to uphold, and adequate parking was
being provided for. N
The Mayor closed the p•iblic hearing.
Owen Yost, Urban Planner, stated that this was a request for
change in zoning from SF-7 to Planned Development. The site
was located on the corner of Fannin and Welch Street. He
stated that a new index, the Landscape Volume Index, would be
in effect for this developement which dealt with the amount of
trees saved and the development was well within adequate 1
limits. According to the Denton Development Plan the
development would be compatible with the neighborhood. Parking
would be located behind the structure and the lot would not be
seen. The development did not conflict with any master plan of
the University of North Texas.
The following ordinance was considered:
t
Ii
I
I
1
i
~ 1
t V
4 {
e
i ~
City of Denton City Council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 5
NO. 89-134
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, PROVIDING iJl
FOR A CHANGE FROM SINGLE FAMILY - 7 (SF-7) TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR
1.054 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON TH6 NORTHWEST CORNER OF 1
WELCH AND FANNIN STREETS, AS MORE PARTICULARLY I
DESCR:SED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A
DETAILED PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR 1
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
- DATE.
r
Hopkins motioned, McAdams seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye,„ Ayer
j "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens ,aye.,, Motion carried
t unanimously.
B. The Council held a
of Metroplex Engineering requestingbai variac eg of ArticleiI1I,~
4.04, Q, sidewalks to the Denton Subdivision and Land
Development Regulations for the Endres Addition. (The Planning
and Zoning commission recommended a partial variance.) V-4e
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Bud Havptmar, Metroplex Engineering, stated that Miller Brewing +
Corporation desired to expand its warehouse and office
facilities. A variance was being requested due to the unique
conditions of the property, that being the movers topography of
the area. The Planning and ZoninV Commission had recommended a
partial variance on the sloped atea of the property.
Clyde Fisher, Miller Brewing Corporation, stated that the
sidewalk would really be one to no where as there would Le no
other sidewalks in the area. He was also concerned about the
safety in the area.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Owen Yost, Urban Planner, showed slides of the area where the
proposed
would
built. reviewed
sthe tatedgthatmethe
Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended a
variance, partial
Alexander motioned, Hopkins seconded to approve the request as
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. On roll
vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd "aye." and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
i
1
1 ±
c:
1
r
v
City of Denton City Council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 6
3. The Council considered :ecommending approval of the
preliminary ceplat of the Endres Addition, Lots 2, Block 1 into
Lot 1R, Block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval.)
Hopkins motioned, McAdams seconded to epprove the replat. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd '-aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously. ,
4. The Council received a citizen report from Joe Dodd
concerning Cable Subscriber Bill of Rights.
Mr. Dodd presented a proposed resolution to the Council in
support of federal legislation returning local control for the
regulation of cable t.v.
Mayor Stephens thanked Mr. Dodd for the information and asked
if he had presented It to the Cable T.V. Advisory Board.
Mr. Dodd stated that the Board had not met recently.
s
Mayor Stephens stated that the Board would meet soon and would
review the proposed resolution for possible Council
consideration.
5. Consent Agenda
Ayer motioned, H;,pkins seconded to approve the Consent Agenda
as presented. motion carried unanimously.
A. Bids and Purchase orders:
t
1. Bid 01007 - Malone Stcee- Drainage
2. Bid 01011 - Denia Park
B. Plate and Replats
1. Consider approval of the preliminary ceplat
I of the Wattam Addition, Lots 7 and 8, Block
2 into Lot 7R, Block 2. (Planning 6 Zoning
recommended approval.)
f
f }
pFh
y
ti S
~t
City of Denton City Council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 7
6. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
The following ordinance was considered: +
NO. 89-135 1
AN ORDINANCE P.CCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING
FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR
IMPROVEMENTS: PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Boyd seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
amending the Schedule of Rates for Sewer Service. (The Public I
Utilities Board recommended approval.)
{
Mayor Stephens granted a citizen request to speak before the
council.
Fred Hill, Lone Star Car Wash, asked if there were provisions
in the ordinance to apply for exception to the rate if the J
discharge was within pollution limits and thus be able to be
charged the straight commercial rate.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that there was a provision
in the ordinance that allowed individuals to apply for an
exception which required a testing of the discharge and if
within normal limits, arouId be charged at the straight
commercial rate.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 89-136 {
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR SEWER
SERVICE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vot.n, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
I
1
J
1
,I
iytti ~4
Y ' 1
f
1 1
II
N
W ,
City of Denton city council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 8
Ordinances C, D, E, and F were pulled by staff. 1
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance 1
authorizing publication of Notice of Intention to issue
Certificates of Obligation of the City of Denton, Texas.
John MCGrane, Executive Director for Finance, stated that this
would be a combined issue with the recently passed revenue bond
sale in order to cut some costs in the issuance cost. The
Certificates would be for three projects, the GIS System, the ~a
new phone system, and renovation to the municipal garage.
f The following ordinance was considered:
I
NO. 89-137
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF +
INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION OF THE
i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS.
f
McAdams motioned, Alexander seconded to adopt the ordinance. y
` On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "a e,11
Ayer "aye, '1 Boyd "aye, 11 and Mayor Stephens 'aye. Motion
I carried unanimously.
H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
of the City of Denton, Texas, approving a compromise settlement
and release of all claims for pending litigation between the
` City of Denton and Matthew Struble and Rosemary Struble.
The following ordinance was considered:
NO. 89-138
1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A
COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLRIMS FOR
PENDING LITIGATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
4 MATTHEW STRUBLE AND ROSEMARY STRUBLE; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Hopkins seconded to adop*, the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye." Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Ayer
j "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
establishing classified positions in the Fire Department of the
City of Denton, Texas and providing for the number of persons
authorized for each classified position.
I
i
I
1
I
~ j
r
,
4
City of Denton City Council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 9
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that each year after :h;s
adoption of the budget. Council was required by State law to
formally authorize by ordinance, the number and classification
of positions in the police and fire departmer,ts.
The following ordinance was considered:
ORDINANCE NO. 89-139
rr~ AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CLASSIFIED POSITIONS IN THE
FIRE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS;
PROVIDING FOR THE NUMBER OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED FOR
EACH CLASSIFIED POSITION; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES
AND RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DECLARING AN
j EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motioned, Hopkins seconded to adopt the ordinance. On
roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
a
~ J. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance I
I esta~lishing classified positions In the Police Department of
I the City of Denton, Texas and providing for the number of
persons authorized for each classified position.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this ordinance was
similar to the one for the Fire Department.
The following ordinance was considered;
NO. 89-140 I
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE NUMBER OF PERSONS
AUTHORIZED TO BE EMPLOYED IN EACH. CLASSIFIED POSITION
IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF DENTON#
TEXAS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IN
CONFLICT HEREWITH, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Boyd motioned, Ayer seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll
13 vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Ayer
"aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye.,, Motion carried
j unanimously.
7. Resolutions I
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
authorizing the City Manager to execute certain Airport leases
for pad sites and T-hanger at the Denton Municipal Airport
under certain circumstances.
r
V low
R, 1
4
s
tl,
` City oL Denton City Council Minutes
October 3, 1989
Page 10
j Rick Svehla, Deput-r City Manager, stated that this resolution
would llow south.sra% part ofe the City Airport Qthattwassdevelopedl for T leases hangers.
I
The following resolution was considered:
RESOLUTION N0. R89-069
i
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
CERTAIN AIRPORT LEASES Fri`? PAD SITES FOR T-HANGARS AT
THE DENTON N AIRPORT CERTA
CIRCUMSTANC S: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, IN '
I
I ~ Hopkins motioned, McAdams seconded to approve the resolution.
Hopkins "aye,"
On roll vote, McAdams aye, Alexander aye,
Ayer "aye," Boyd and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
B. The Co+incil considered approval of a resolution
in support of Proposition No. S for funding construction of new
correctional facilities.
j Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that a letter had been V
received from the City of Hondo requesting a resolution of
support from the City Council.
Council Member Hopkins stated that she had a problem with
asking voters how to vote.
Council Member McAdams stated that she was not that familiar
mfo
with on a
abl supportruntiltshe hadaadchance nto review the Prop sitioning for
Boyd motioned, Alexander seconded to o rolls vote, the r solution l
until the next Council meeting. „ Boyd "aye," and
Alexander "aye," Hopkins aye, Ayer aye,
Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
Stem C. was not discussed during the Council meeting.
- 3. Miscellaneous matters from the city Manager
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following item:
A. The final sales check for the year had been
received and was substantially up from the projected ariount.
9. There was no Executive Session held during the Work
session,
I
1
~ r
City of Denton City council minutes
October 3, 1989
y Page 11
10. New Business
The following items were presented by Council Members for items
for future agendas:
A. Council Member Hopkins requested staff begin work
on possible variance procedures for the sign ordinance.
B. Council Member Boyd requested staff to check into
the possibility of a traffic problem at Carroll and Parkway
since the intersection of Carroll and Pearl had bbeiu changed.
C. Mayor Stephens presented an update on TMPA
activities Including the refunding of revenue bonds, official
approval of the hydro project and an improved rating at Moody's.
Council Member Gorton returned to the meeting.
f 11. The council then convened into Executive Session to
discuss legal matters (considered action in Denton County vs.
City and In Re: Flow), real estate, and Personnel/ Board
appointments (considered appointment of a nominee to the Denton
Central Appraisal Clstrlct).
No official action was taken.
I
With no further action, the meeting was adjourned at 10:12 p.m.
i
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
JENNIFER WALTERS
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
3198C
r
d
r,
r
h
6
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
October 10, 1989
The Council convened into the Special Sessiun at 5:30 P.M. in
the Civil Defense Room,
PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem Ayer; Council
Members Alexander, Boyd, Gorton, and McAdams
ABSENT: Council Member Hopkins
1. The Council considered approval of a resolution in
support of Proposition No. 8 for funding construction of new
correctional facilities.
Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this proposition was
to authorize the issuance of $400 million in general obligation
bonds which could be used to acquire, construct, or equip new
corrections institutions, mental health and mental retardation
institutions, youth corrections institutions, and statewide law
' enforcement facilities and to repair and renovate w:cistIng
facilities of those institutions. The local mental health
facility was expected to benefit from this proposition because
of the $5 million worth of renovations planned.
Council Member McAdams stated that she would like to have had
more information on this issue statl.%n both pros and cons. Sh9
had heard that there w,s erme opposition because none of th'.s
money had been earmarked for rehabilitation.
s
Council Member Alexander stated that there was some opposition
to bonds because this method of financing was contrary to the
"pay as you go,' theory.
Mayor Stephens stated that the proposition stemmed tram the
need for more facilities,
i
Mote discussion followed with the consensus of Council that
they preferred not to give direction to the citizens of Denton
on how to vote on an issue in which they had no special
expertise and insufficient information.
The following resolution was considered:
No.
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION NO. 8 FOR
FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
i
I
I
r
r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
October 10, 1989
Page 2
Gorton motioned, McAdams seconded to table the resolution
indefinitely. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye,,'
Gorton "aye," Ayer "nay," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens 1
"nay." Motion carried with 4-2 vote.
2. The Council convened Into Executive Sessiod to discuss
legal matters, real estate, and personnel/board ap-aintments
(held annual review with the Municipal Judge, City Attorney,
and City Manager).
No action was taken
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:32
p.m.
RAY STEPH
ENS, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
1
BETTY WILLIAMS
DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON J
i
I
I
I~
r
1
i
1
4766M
i
1 J
~ 4 .
Err
i
I
I
I
II
E
~h
i
~ E
I
11.01" 1
L I
IF low
DATE: 11/21/89
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council J
rROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1
SUBJECT: HARTLEE FIELD "BRACKET LAW
RECOMMENDATION:
Council voted 4-2 on November 7, 19e9 to direct staff to prepare an
ordinance exempting street ani sidewalk requirements.
4 Staff recommends on-site drainage also be exempted because most of
the on-site drainage will be handled along streets exempt from our
regulations.
I SUMMARY:
I
Amends the Sjbdivision and Land Development Regulations by exempting
1 developers of historically significant airfields from street,
`r sidewalk, and on-site drainage requirements.
I BACKGROUND:
Historic Landmark Commission October 16, 1989 (minutes attached)
Discussion:
j
Planning and Zoning Diecussiont October 25, 1989 (minutes attached)
Planning and Zoning recommends only
{ } sidewalks be exempted.
Council -liscussioni November 7, 1989
I
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR CROUPS AFFECTED:
Jf
Developers of Hartlee Field and its future users and residents.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None, unless sidewalks, street and drainage improvements are
requested wt+en the development is within city limits.
i
I
low
~ yP1Nn•.. . i
Mayor and Council Members
November 10, 1989
Page 2
ATTACHMENTS:
Memo, Robbins with the following attachments:
Planning and Zoning Minutes;
Historic Landmark Commission Minutes;
Memo Re: Airport Control; Memos Res Airport
Board Concerns; County Road Standards
I ~
4espeM lly ubmApproved: Harre 1
City anager
-h I
iljoxclllr~" 1<t- .
Fran H. Ro na, AICP
Executive Director
Planning and Development
2076k
I
1 I .
I 'I
I
s
1
f' Y:e. A
Y
Ir
,
1
r~ .
I
CITY of DENTON 1215 E. McI(Oney I Denton, Texas 76201
F MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 9, 1989
Tot Mayor and City Council
FROHt Frank H. Robbins, Executive Director
Planning and Development
SUBJECT: HAReLEE FIELD BRACKET LAN
SUMMARY
. Cities are enabled to define the rules under which certain subdivisions
ui
1
with certain characteristics are reqred to follow.
2. A technique we may follow to t ccoateeat"that kfits awithin wai"bracket" of
standards would be applied to developm
standards.
"bracket" in the state platting law which reads rs followst
, These is a
3
1Y to an owner of a tract of lead the n
(e) This section dies not app ulation of
(1) is located wholly within a municipality with a pop
51000 or least
(2) is divided into parts larger than 2 112 acres$ and
(3) abuts any part of an aircraft runway.
1 Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 1499 section 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1981-
4. This "bracket law" does not apply to Denton, but is only an example of a
bracket law.
5, Mr. Hill has advised staff that:
a) he intends to develop a 27 lot, one ound ecre minimum lot subdivisions
field in
with homes of 193009
northeast and 1940,a a extraterritorial jurisdictiOnI
the city
1
I
1
n
i
~MR fetE
y[
T
is
Ik '
Mayor and City Council
November 9, 1989
Page 2
work on, include fly frommuandmstand oreh antique would be
and used fscilities, to
b) ithe mproved existing
These facilities would be similar to the applicant's existing
facilities at the Justin Times Airport which was condemned by Ft.
Worth for Alliance Airport;
c) new hangars, resembling the existing hangars, would be built;
d) compliance with street and sidewalk requirements in the city's
subdivision regulations would detract from the historic atmosphere of
the 1930'x-1940's that he wishes to create there and could jeopardize
acquisition of national historic registery status;
e) the development will comply with all other subdivision standards;
and,
f) development of the field, or elsewhere, must be done very soon
because of the time frames associated with Justin Time's condemnation;
b. Mr. Hill indicates he would not comply with ROW dedication requirements
for -site internal paving, build would any sinot pave dewalks, a or comply j with include street spacinger or
off
standards.
7. A preliminary plat has been filed for this development, but the applicant i
withdrew its consideration at the October 25 meeting of the Planning and
i Zoning Commission. Review of the preliminary plat continues, contingent
V on the fora of the "bracket law."
I 8. At the applicant's request, we are expediting the "bracket law".
9. The Historic Landmark Commission has expressed the support for the
historical concept and its nomination for the National Register of
Historic Places.
i
1U. Staff cannot support this "bracket law."
HAR:fLEE FIELD DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
1. The Denton Development Plan
+ a. Neighborhood preservation.
Ir b. The airport is in a low intensity area.
C. A proposed thoroughfare traverses the proposed development.
2. Nuise.
3. Safety and City or County Control - Clear zones and height restrictions.
See attachment 2.
P i
i
r.,
I
Mayor and city Council
November 9, 1989
page 3
I
aving of Hartlee Field cnad has little to do with the
. Perimeter street p
4
field's proposed historic nature.
5. State health permits will be required for the proposed use of one well
for the 15 homes and airfield buildings.
b. Time and number of flight operations.
l
7. The field is an existing, operational, private airfiel,'.
Ir
B. Not all lots on the preliminary plat are at least one acre is size.
ain be in the gnaof theldntcheadcannot beoineuredpandathErc ad assign
9. Since proposed
des, i
and drainage design standards of our regulations are closely0ffnsnte
on ante drainage erequireddandhcouldbbe"relatively costly also.
drainage may y
They do
10, Attachment 4 is the county's existing subdivision regulations.
not include a provision for unpaved streets.
11. State historic officials have advised staff that paving roads within the
development would have an impact on an application for historic
designation, but that impart would be le,,.s than construction of new
homes. Historic Registry designati`ney wouli saidprobably exclude the area of
residential lots and their drives, of stree
rds 12. therCity fro iensuringsadeq ateeemergency vehicletaccess. Staff.lhassable
suggested that the applicant voluntarily show emergency vehicle access -Coo easements on the preliminary and final plat and seeenMacceas wayper Creek
RFD and City of Denton Fire Department approval of whose
construction is capable of handling fire engines.
13. Mr. Hill has written to City officials stating that commercial sirshows
at Hartlee.
occur would not
ALTS S
1. Comply witli regulations.
2. Variances.
NOTEi Criteria for approval probably could not be met.
3, "Bracket law" for vintage aircraft, grassed stripped runway with one acre
single family homes adjoining.
4. Changing the standards.
NOTE& Staff did not support changing the street standards, but can
support not requiring sidewalks in estate lot subdivision (one acre or
larger),
1
{
ai SN'S v t
Fu
f
r 8
Mayor and City Council
November 9, 1989
Page 4
5. Annexation.
NOTE: Annexation will require the City to extend utilities here within
four years.
6. Deed restrictions to ensure personal accebs, restrict flights, and hours
of operation.
7. Assessment districts, if after annexation in the distant future, in
r response to requests for drainage, sidewalk, or street improvements here.
Attachments
1. P&Z Minutes and HLC Minutes
2. Memo, Persaud, Res Airport Control
3. Memo, Thompson, Res Airport Hoard Concerna
4. County of Denton Road Standards 1
I
Fran Robbins
WP
j 2u75k
I ~
~I
I
v
i
t
ti
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ARTICLE 4.02
OF DIVISION I OF CHAPTER IV OF APPENDIX A OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
TO PROVIDE THAT STREET, SIDEWALK, AND ON-SITE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS
SHALL NOT APPLY TO DEVELOPMENTS ALONG CERTAIN AIRPORT RUNWAYS)
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That Article 4.02 of Division I of Chapter IV of
Appendix A of the Code of ordinances is amended by adding a new
paragraph (D) to read as follows:
I
(D) The provisions of Division II of Chapter IV ("Street
and Sidewalk Requirements and Design Standards") and any
provision of Article 4.15 ("Drainage Requirements"), relating
to on-site drainage shall not apply to a tract of land that:
(1) is divided into iota larger than one acre;
(2) abuts any part of a grass aircraft runway which is no
longer than 3,000 feet; and
(7) abuts an airport that contains buildings of historic
significance used prior to or during World War II.
SECP,IQN II. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the ~ day of , 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: , v ` vti•.~
I
J
i
a
ATTACHMENT 1
P Minutes Oct tober t25, o 1989 RAFT
Page 4 DO V. Consider recommending approval of the
preliminary the Searls Addition, Lot 1, Block 1,plat
STAFF REPORT AND REC 12WDATION: Mr. Yost presented the
staff report (attached) and slides of the site to the
commission.
He said that the Development Review Committee Recommends
approval with the condition that it be noted on the final
plat that the applicant whether;
1. A water line proposed by the Endres Addition is in
place, and will be extended to serve the Searls
Addition.
2. Plans to protect the building via a sprinkler system
have contracted for and are acceptable to the city
j of Denton.
A building permit will not be issued until one of these
two options is in place.
DECISIO.ii: Ms. Kikor moved to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat of the Searle Addition, Lot 1, Block 1
with the condition. Seconded by Mr. Kamman and
unanimously carried (4-0).
VI• Consider an a;aendmant to the Appendix A, Subdivision and
Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances,
which would exempt certain airfields from certain
requirements.
Mr. Robbins stated that the Commission is being requested
to consider a bracket law which would waive the
provisions of Chapter IV, Division II0 Streets and
Sidewalk Requirements and Design Standards. The
provisions would not govern or apply to a tract of land
that:
1. is divided into parts larger than one acre: and,
2. abuts any part of a grass aircraft runway which is
no longer than 1,000 feat, and
i 1. abuts an airport which contains buildings of
historic significance used prior to or during World
` War II.
i
i
1-i
11
J
s°
Y
l
DRAB
P6Z Minutes
October 25, 1989
Page 5
Mr. Robbins reviewed the memorandum theta staff written to nthe ot
commission (attached). said does
support the bracket law because they are unable to
distinguish between subdivision withHe pointwithout
ed out
airfields and what should apply
that the city cannot control height restrictions and
clear zones in the extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) ;
however doe ffactors,ithe t e costvand off-siterdrainage.her
Mr. Kamman asked the nature of the historic buildings.
k Mr. Robbins said that the hangars were used prior to and
during World War :I (WWII). There is an existing museum.
Mr. Holt stated that the residents of Hidden Valley
warned aaboutoit. buying
Airfield was a property ianidSouthvithat ;should bproblem
Mr. Robbins agreed that noise is an issue.
Mr. Holt asked if a variance of the subdivision
regulations would be applicable.
Mr. Robbins stated that al oe criteria wovild not allow
f a variance. T
staff he proposed
4 staff to recommend app
bracket law would not apply anywhere else in Denton but
could set a precedent for others to ask for bracket laws;
however, there are no other
ing that historic
the bracket, lawn my
area. Staff is suggesting
to development abutting an airfield with existing
historic buildings.
Mr. Holt asked what protection the City has that the
developer will design the homes as stated.
Mr. Robbins stated lthat the City ca of control buildings j
in the F W, only the infrastructure.
VIII
Mr. am because asked strif the deveopers do not want to eets ware not paved in the forties`.e
street
Mr. Robbins said that is the idea.
Mr. Kamman asked if the City will get stuck paving the ;
streets at a later time.
Mr. Robbins ; concerned about right-of-way note Laing The staff dedicater4. is also
1-2
1
A
r
i
PcZ Minutes BRA OctobeC 25, 1989 F +f
Page 6
Mr. Kamman asked why they were not observe the distance
requirement between outlets onto Hartlee Field Road.
Mr. Robbins stated that their frontage is too narrow. i
He said that they will have to got sate permits for the
existing well if they intend to use it to serve the
entire subdivision. The development will also use septic
r tanks.
PETITIONER: W. D. Hill, Route 1, eox 69-AA, Justin,
I stated that he is an engineer and mathematician. He
started flying in the 1930s. His family was in aviation.
j He now lives on a private airfield in Denton County and
1 along with other residents restores, flys, and shows
antique aircraft. They have lost the opportunity to ,
conduct their lives as they wish because their property
as been condemned and their airfield will be closed, j
They have looked at other airfields and decided that
Hartle* Field would meet their needs. The bracket
ordinance would allow them to create the necessary a
atmosphere. It would not create a precedent because this 4
is a unique situations however, the
question of whether ~
bracket laws are desirable is not before the Commission.
A homeowners association has been formed to finance the
` purchase of the airfield and to approach the City so the
residents can move from one private airfield in the
County to another. Most of the members of the
association are from Denton County. A few are not, but
all members have a common interest. The bracket law will
satisfy historic concerns. There is no developer
involved but this project will be a benefit for all. The
appearance of the houses will be governed by the by-laws
which will be submitted to the City, plans must be
approved by the association and the State will provide
architectural assistance. He said that there is more to
historical value than just a building. There must be a
feeling. The association objects to the use of asphalt
and concrete. Crushed gravel may be suitable. A
historical look must be maintained. There will be 15
f families involved but not all will have home sites. Some
I will only have hangars, but the association does not
4 object to having more homes in the future and if so, they
do not object to digging more wells. The association is
concerned with meeting City health and welfare
requirements but are also concerned with historic
standards. They want to preserve the neighborhood.
1-3
I
J
I
7
q.
f
I
9
f +Y
u V c.a fi
P62 Minutes
October 25, 1989
Page 7
He added that the development will affect the proposed
arterial, but that is many years in the future, and the
historic area will be well established. Also, the number
of flights and times will be reduced from what is
currently occurring.
Mr. Holt asked if the project had been discussed with the
neighbors.
Mr. Hill stated that the operator of the museum got a
favorable response from the neighborhood group. The
association intends to make less noise and will change
the take-off and landing area to the east so they will
not be flying directly over the neiyhborhood to the west.
Mr. Holt stated that there were sidewalks in the 1930s
and 408.
Mr. Hill said that may be true and if the state historic
commission recommends them, they will comply. They want
a historic perspective.
Mr. Holt asked how many families will live in the
subdivision.
Mr. Hill said nine or ton. Five families will have
hangars. They may decide to build in the future but do
not wish to do so at this time.
r
IN FAVORS Bill White, Randol Mill Road, Southlake,
stated that he has been in aviation for 35 years. He
was the third member to join the association. Today, the
country is short of pilots. The airlines need more of
them and there is nothing to prevent a flight school from
opening at Hartle* Field. There would be a lot of noise
and traffic. The association wants to create a quality
atmosphere. A lot of money will be invested in each home
and they do not want to degrade their investment. The
development will be an improvement and will be in keeping
with a historic feeling.
Mr. Glasscock asked if the aircraft will be historic.
Mr. White said yes. The runway will be of grass which
{ can be damaged by modern aircraft.
I
1-4
1
o j ; f
5 yl J ~ i .
Ei ~."w
P&Z Minutes DRAFT
October 250 1989
Page 8
Robert Smith, 2408 Texas Drive, stated that he is a CPA
for non-profit organizations. He read a letter to the
Commission from Olan Lancaster, the Director of Frontiers
of Flight. The letter said that the University of Texas
has been the home of a history of a•: iation collection for
26 years. This collection is beirg moved to Love Field.
Frontiers of Flight is in favor of Mr. Hill's proposal.
The want to enlarge and will need storage and repair
space. They would like the City to cooperate. Mr. Smith
continued that he also owns antique aircraft and is one
of the homeowners. Hartlee Field was involved in early
aviation. He pointed out that the noise level of the old
airplanes is much less than modern aircraft.
Buddy Cole, Denton County Commissioner Precinct 1, said
that he thinks the development will be good for Denton
County. As Commissioner, he would appreciate the
cooperation to extend the tax base. The development will
be quite an improvement. The roads have been gravel
since WWII. Senator John Glenn and Ed McMahan got their
training at Hartlee Field. There is an old hangar on
Missile Base Road that was a part of the facility. The
County has been using a chemical base stabilizer in the
roads because it cannot afford lime stabilization. This
chemical stabilizer is being used at Alliance Airport.
The gravel road could be coated with it. The gravel road
would be hard and dust would be reduced. He asked the
City to cooperate with the project.
Mike Cochran, Chairman of the Historic Landmark
Commission (HLC), stated that the Commission is in favor
of the development with the provision that the airfield
be nominated to the National Register. He said that he
understands the Commission's desire to avoid setting
precedent, but if the bracket law is based on application
to the National Register, it would not open the flood
gates for future requests. The development will benefit
the County and is a good historic and economic
opportunity. An attachment concerning application to the
National Register will avoid having a precedent ■et.
Because the development is in the ET-70 The HLC does not
i have the authority to apply, but will encourage the
application process. This will also be in line with
proposed state legislation. This is a unique situation.
Another alternative is to incorporate and that would be
of no benefit to the City of Denton. If the proposal is
dropped, it would be a loss to the community. The
architects at the state Historical Commission were
delighted with the prospect of helping design the homes.
1-5
A
k
i_
k
V
f
4
PSZ Minutes I^1 A F T
October 250 1989
Bage 9
He requested approval of the project with a bracket law
requiring application to the National Register.
Mr. Holt stated that this appears to be an attempt to
avoid installation of curb and gutter and sidewalks. in
the 30s and 40s there were no houses and new hangars
along the runway. Houses from that time period had
sidewalks. He said that he likes the idea and does not
L think the noise will be bad.
Ir Mr. Cochran stated that he does not know the financial
aspects of the requirements, but does not want to
discourage the project. The location is in a rural area
and not an urban one. Curb and gutter and sidewalks are
important, but this project is so unique it should not
be hold up.
i
Mr. Holt asked if the HLC knew that five or six members
of the association would not be living along the
airfield.
Mr. Cochran said that he thinks they understood that.
Mr. Clark clarified that curb and gutter is not required
for an estate type subdivision. A 24 foot section of
paving is required. These rules apply to subdivisions
with lots of more than one acre.
Mr. Holt clarified that a street built parallel to Golden
circle would not need curb and gutter but would need
sidewalks.
i
Mr. Clark said yes.
Troy Stimson, Route 1, Sox 9, Justin, stated that his
house was built in the 409. It did not have curb and
gutter but it did have a sidewalk. He explained that the
hangars will also have be a 1930s or 40s type structure.
Jim Payne, 917 Egan, stated that he has been involved in
aviation for 25 years. its lives in Denton in a house
r that was built in the 1920s. He would like to have that
house along an airfield.
~ I
Mr. Robbins stated that staff does not support the
bracket law.
Mr. Hill said that the brackot law is essential for the
project to progress.
1-b
i
k
E;
i
4
P&2 Minutes D ~'b 15
October 25, 1989
Page 10
Mr. Clark stated that grading with borrow ditches would
have to be done along the streets.
Mr. Holt said that the issue appears to be sidewalks.
Mary Keasler, 2315 Southridge Dr., stated that she has
lived in Denton for 1S years and never had a sidewalk.
She asked why they are an issue.
Mr. Holt stated that they are required in the subdivision
Regulations for all new developments.
Mr. Cole stated that the road at issue is a county road.
There ale ditches in place and drainage is not a problem.
The County continuously cleans ditches. It is obvious
to builders that they must deal with drainage! however,
five inches of asphalt is a lot to require of 15 houses.
It would cost a lot of money. Sidewalks are nice but
would be expensive to place across an acre of frontage.
Mr. Robbins stated that staff might support an amendment
to the Subdivision Regulations that would not require
sidewalks in an estate type subdivision.
Vice-chairman Holt closed the public hearing.
Ms. Kiker suggested tabling the item in order to look
more closely at the sidewalk issue.
Mr. Robbins said that the amendment he mentioned would
apply to all estate subdivisions, not just Hartles Field.
i
Mr. Holt stated that he is basically in favor of the
development, but has had phone calls from other people
in the arrs~e no is concerned about setting a precedent
tot bt~aolt~' laws.,' The issue boils down to costs. It
would be said that the City let people who can afford
$2000000 homes get around the subdivision Regulations so
why can't someone also get around them. It has come out
that curb and gutter will not be required. There may be
f an alternative for the sidewalks. Paving and drainage
would still be an issue.
I~
1-7
s
a,
P&Z Minutes
October 250 1989
Page 11
Mr. Glasscock stated that he is impressed with the
project. It has historical value and will be an asset
to the city and county. He was in the Air Force and is
familiar with many antique aircraft. He said that he
does not think that noise will be a problem and would
like to see the project get off the ground. There is a
time factor. Drainage is a problem.
Mr. Robbins stated
drainage regulations. ant is willing to
comply with t ,
Mr. Hill said that he does have a professional drainage
assessment.
` Mr. Robbins reviewed some of the street requirements and
E alternatives with the Commission.
Mr. Morris stated that the City is not concerned with
individual right of access and cannot enforce them. The
purpose of the Subdivision Regulations is to protect the
public interest such as access for emergency vehicles.
The City is not concerned whether someone is allowed to
cross someone slse$s property.
Mr. Holt moved to amend the Subdivision and Land
Development Regulations Article 1.01 Jurisdiction addingi
h The provisions of Chapter IV, Division II, Sidewalk
Requirements and Design STandards shall not govern or
apply to a tract of land thatt
1, is divided into lots larger than one acres and
2. abuts any part of a grass aircraft runway which is
no longer than 3,000 feet; and
3. habuts istoric nsignificance used prior toe or during World
War 11.
Motion was seconded by Ms. Kiker and unanimously carried
-0).
Mr. Clark left the meeting.
I I i
i
i
1-8 ~
e
r
Historic L ndmatrksCommission DRATH
October 16, 1984
T
he regular meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission of
tne
Octobery16E 19en89ton inTthesPlwas anningdCoat 5:00 nference Room~lofdthe
Municipal Building at 215 E. McKinney,
Present: Mike Cochran, Judith Abbott, W,A. Barker,
Gaylen Fickey, Rita Holcomb, eullitt Lowry,
Tom Polk Miller, and Janet Shelton
Absent: Richard Hayes
Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for ,
Planning and Development; Elizabeth Evans, Planning
Administrator; Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; Joe
Morris, Assistant City Attorney; and Donna Baker
Secretary ,
Chairman Cochran called the meeting to order.
1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of September 11, 1989,
i
Mr. Lowry moved to approve the minutes of
September 11, 1989, Seconded by Mr. Barker and
unanimously carried (7-0).
N. Hold a discussion on the proposed historic airport a
Hartlee Field Road,
t
~"j
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Evans reported that there is an
Ms. in tatedathehapplicantsFwould Allkerto restore
the airport and construct permanent homes on
individual lots. She reported that though the
pro arty was located outside the city limits, it was
still,in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and
the city had control over it. The City does not
require the property to be zoned but does require
landowners to meet subdivision and platting
requirements. During the platting process, the City
P notifies the landowner of Improvements that will be
required, Ms. Evans stated that the applicants did
not want to make the required improvements for the
streets and sidewalks.
Ms. Shelton asked if the applicants wish to live at
the airfield. Mr. Cochran said ,yes. He added that
they are currently living at the airfield in Justin.
Due to the new Alliance Airport in Fort Worth, the
applicants are now required to move their planes.
I-9
J
NL,: Minutes P
agebZr l6, 19 dD'A 1SLSF
j
s. Evans stated that Dwayne Jones, with the Texas
M
Historical Commission, said the Historic Landmark
Commission's jurisdiction was to the city limits.
Ms. Abbott stated that she believed the Commission
had jurisdiction in the ETJ also.
Ar. Robbins explained that the city cannot regulate
buildings In the ETJ. The jurisdiction of the city
is limited around the airport as well.
Mr. Lowry asked if Hartlee Field was a public
airport. Ms. Evans said no.
Mr. Hill, one of the applicants, explained that there
are two types of airports. The first is public
airports that any person would have access and the
second is private airports that are restricted.
Private airports are individually owned and no one
can use the airport without prior approval from the
owner.
Mr. Lowry asked if someone would need prior approval
from the owner before they could land at the
airport. Mr. Hill said yes, if the owner chose to,
the owner could deny the pilot's request to land. a
Ms. Abbott stated that she thought Hartlee Field was +
a public airport. Mr. Hill reported that It used to
be a public airport but was then bought by
individuals who chose to have it become private.
Mr. V.ckey arrived.
Mr. Cochran stated that since the property was in the
ETJ, there was a possibility that it may eventually
be brought into the city limits.
Ms. Abbott asked Mr. Hill if he was interested in J,
getting on the National Register. Mr. Hill said yes.
Mr. Cochran agreed that the airport should be on the
National Register.
Mr. Lowry also agreed and felt the airport should be
preserved. The Commission agreed.
Mr. Lowry asked Mr, Hill how long the airport has
111 existed. Mr. Hill stated that in his research, he
found facts going back to the 1930's though it was
1-10 ~
11
I
Ir low
F
k
e
HLC Aiiutes
October 16, 1939
: Page 3 UURAF I
I
difficult to get information on the airport prior to
the 1930Is. He added that his plane was built in
1929 and gave a brief history of his plane.
!is. Shelton asked if problems with the city would be
relieved if the applicant got on the National
Register. Mr. Cochran stated that it may help.
Ms. Holcomb asked if the Commission court decide
based on the policies of the 1930's. Mr. Lowry
stated that there were none at that time.
Mr. Barker asked if the homes along Hartlee Field
Road had curb ano gutter. Ms. Evans said no, not on
Hartlee Field Road but on other roads there are,
Mr. Robbins stated that a bracket law may be done but
he added that the bracket law would allow the
applicants to be exempt only to streets and sidewalk
improvements.
1 Mr. Lowry moved to recommend that the Historic
Landmark Commission accspt and vir,w, with interest,
an application for National Register. Seconded by
Mr. Barker and unanimously carried (e-0).
f
i
I
I
I
I
19S7x
f
1-11
R^
~s e£
t,
s
.
ATTACHMENT 2
CITY of DENTON t 215 E, McKinney / Denton. Texas 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATZi October 18, 1989
TO: Planning add Zoning Commission
FROMI Harry N. Persaud, AICP Senior Planner
SUSJECTt HEICHT HAZARD AREA AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ZONI4G
AROUND HARTLEE FIELD
Aircraft operatical say endanger the lives and property of land owners sad
other users of as airport. It is nectesery therefore, is the interest of
public health, safety amd general welfare to prevent the creation of an
airport hazard, to the extent legally possible, by the exercise of the police
power.
The Airport Zoning Act Chapter 241 of the Local Government Code provides the
framavork for a political subdivision to adopt, administer and enforce height
hazard area and land use compatible toning.
Height hazard area zoning relates to the height of buildings and structures in
the various zones around an airport; the horizontal surface, the conical
surface, the primary surface, the approach surface and the transitional
surface. rhasa goats are described in Exhibit I (attached) excerpted from "A
Procedural Guide for Cities and Counties of Texasi Height hazard and lead use
toning for Airports," Texas Aeronautics Commission.
Lead use compatibility zoning identifies land uses that are normally
compatible or non-compatible with various levels of noise erouad airports.
Residential development is generally not recommended where sound levels exceed
63 LDN (day - night sound level measured in dacibele). Exhibit It list some
effects of noise on residential land uses and Exhibit III compares noise
levels in various activities eacouatere' daily.
In order for a political subdivision, that is a city or county, to be able to
regulate land uses and building beighta, the Airport Zoning Act requires
(1) that the airport be located within the political subdivision
(Section 241.011) and (2) that the airport is used is the interest of the
2-1
u
{~f a
Y
Planning and Zoning Commission
} October 18, 1989
Page 2
public to the benefit of the political subdivision. (Sa-iom 241.012 and
Section 241.013)
Hattlee Field is classified as a private restricted airport and it is outside
the city limits. The City of Denton therefore cannot adopt, administer or
enforce height hazard area and land use compatibility zoning. Denton County,
however, cam exercise these functions under Section M.011 of the Local
Government Code. If the City of Denton desires to regulate land uses and
building heights in the public interest, there are two options available at
this timer
(1). The City of Demtom work closely with Denton County to exercise the
powers granted to the county under Section 241.011 of the Local {
Government code.
i
(21. The City of Denton pursue annexation of the airport then proceed to
regulate land use and building heights under Section 241.011. If
the City pursues annexation, then we may have to consider a larger
area about 500 acres which will include the various height hazard
and noise zones around Hartles Field. The fiscal impact of this
annexation may be considerable, especially if we are required to
extend water amd wastewater services to the aanaxed area within
4 1/2 years in accordance with new 1989 state legislation.
Harry N. rsaud
wp 1
34171
j i
2-1
T-W
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 18, 1989
Page 2
public to the benefit of the political subdivision, (Section 241,012 and
Section 241.013)
Hartlea Field is classified as a private restricted airport and it is outside
the city limits. The City of Denton therefore cannot adopt, administer or j
enforce height hazard area and land use compatibility zoning. Denton County, 1
however, can exercise these functions under Section 241.011 of the Local
Goverameat Code. If the City of Denton desires to regulate laad uses and
building heights is the public interest, there are two options available at
this times
(1). The City of Denton work closely with Denton County to exercise the
powers granted to the county under Section 241.011 of the Local 1
CovernQent code. 1
(2). The City of Denton pursue annexation of the airport then proceed to
regulate land use and building heights under Seetioa 241.011. If
the City pursues annexation, than we may have to consider a larger
area about 500 acres which will include the various height hazard
and noise zones around 8artlee Field. The fiscal impact of this
annexation may be considetable, especially if we are required to
extend water sad wastewater services to the annexed area vithio
4 112 years to accordance with new 1989 state legislation.
Harry N. rsaud
VP J
34178
a
I
2-1
1
1
i
_F low
y
ExHIarT r
AIRPORT HEIGHT-HAZARD; HEIGHT AND SAFETY HAZARDS
To ensure the safety of pilots, air travelers, and the general
public, it is necessary to regulate airspace surrounding airports. 1
The Airport Zoning Act authorizes cities, counties, or joint airport ,
zoning boards to regulate the height of natural growth and structures
around airports. The regulations are based on imaginary surfaces
described in FAR Part 77 (Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace).
Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace
Civil and military airport imaginary surfaces are established
with relation to the airport and to each runway. The size of each
1
I imaginary surface is based on the category of each runway according
to the type rf approach available or planned for that runway. The
} slope and dimensions of the approach surface applied to each end
of a runway are determined by the most grecito approach existing j
or planned for that runway. Figure 4(a) is a visual representation
of civil airport imaginary surfaces. Figure 4(b) identifies the
imaginary surfaces for a military airfield. The imaginary surfaces
for a civil airport as defined by FAR Part 77 are;
Horizontal Surface
A horizontal surface is a horizontal plane 150 feet above the
2-2
..I
i
f
I
I
established airport elevation, the perimeter of which is constructed
by swinging arcs of specified radii from the center of each end of
the primary surface of each runway of the airport and connecting
the adjacent arcs by lines tangent to those arcs. The radius of each
arc is:
{1) 5,000 feet for all runways designated as utility or visual;
(2) 10,000 feet for all other runways.
The radius of the arc specified for each end of a runway will have
the same arithmetical value. That value will be the highest determined
j for either end of the runway. When a 5,000-foot arc is encompassed
by tangents connecting two adjacent 10,000-foot arcs, the 5,000-foot
arc shall be disregarded on the construction of the perimeter of
the horizontal surface.
j Conical Surface
A conical surface extends outward and upward from the periphery
of the horizontal surface at a slope of 20:1 for a horizontal distance
of 4,000 feet.
Primary Surface
A primary surface is longitudinally centered on a runway. When
the runway has a specially prepared hard surface, the primary surface
extends 200 feet beyond each end of that runway; but when the runway
has no specially prepared hard surface or planned hard surface, the
primary surface ends at each end of that runway. the elevation of
any point on the primary surface is the same as the elevation of
' the nearest point on the runway centerline. The width of a primary
i
I
2-3
j
I
t
I
surface is:
i
(1) 250 feet for utility runways having only visual approaches;
(2) 500 feet for utility runways having nonprecision instrument
approaches;
(3) For other than utility runways the width is:
(i) 500 feet for visual runways having only visual
approaches;
(11) S00 feet for nonprecision instrument runways having
visibility minimums greater than three-fourths stat-
ute mile; and
I I
(iii) 1,000 feet for a nonprecision instrument runway
having a nonprecision instrument approach with visi-
bility minimums as low as three-fourths of a statute 1
mii
e, and for precision instrument runways. ~
The width of the primary surface of a runway will be that width pre- 1
scribed in this section for the most precise approach existing or Ali
planned for either end of that runway.
{
Approach Surface
l
An approach surface is a surface longitudinally centered on the
extended runway centerline and extending outward and upward from
each end of the primary surface. An approach surface is applied to
each end of each runway based upon the type of approach available or
planned for that runway end.
(1) The inner edge of the approach surfits is the same width
as the primary surface and it expands uniformly to a width
of
(1) 1,250 feet for that end of a runway other than a
2-4
i
1
J ~
utility runway with only visual approaches;
(ii) 1,500 feet for that end of a runway other than a
utility runway with only visual approaches;
(111) 2,000 feet for that end of a utility runway with a
nonprecision instrument approach;
(iv) 3,500 feet for that end of a nonprecision instrument
runway other than utility having visibility mini-
mums greater than three-fourths of a statute mile;
(v) 4,000 feet for that end of a nonprecision instrument
runway, other than utility, having a nonprecision
instrument approach with visibility minimums as low j
as three-fourths statute mile; and 1
i
(vi) 16,000 feet for precision instrument runways.
(2) The approach surface extends for a horizontal distance of
(i) 5,000 feet at a slope of 20:1 for all utility and
visual runways; J
I (ii) 10,000 feet at a slope of 34:1 for all nonprecision
instrument runways other than utility; and
IM) 10,000 feet at a slope of 50:1 with an additional
40,000 feet at a slope of 40:1 for all precision
instrument runways.
(3) The outer width of an approach surface to an end of a
runway will be that width prescribed in this subsection
4 for the most precise approach existing or planned for that
runway end.
2-5
I ~
I
I
1 3.
l
Transitional Surface
A transitional surface extends outward and upward at right
angles to the runway centerline at a slope of 7:1 from the sides of
the primary surface and from the sides of the approach surface.
Transitional surfaces for those portions of the precision approach
surface which project through and beyond the limits of the conical
surface, extend a distance of 5,000 feet measured horizontally from
the edge of the approach surface and at right angles to the runway
centerline.
Preparation of Hazard Zoning Ordinance
To implement height-hazard zoning for a particular airport, a
zoning map and a written ordinance are required. The map is legally
a part of the ordinance. The map and ordinance can be prepared by
the local planning staff, an airport consultant, or the Texas Aero-
nautics Commission which will prepare a zoning map and draft ordi-
nance upon request of the Airport Zoning Board.
An airport layout plan and a suitable base map are needed to
prepare the zoning map. An airport layout plan is a graphic presents-
tion to scale of existing and proposed airport facilities, their
location on the airports and the pertinent clearance and dimensional
information regalred to show conformance with applicable standards.
The airport layout plan Includes a basic data table showing the air-
port elevation, airport reference point, existing and ultimate run-
ways, and existing and ultimate approach surfaces. These data are
i
needed to select the proper dimensional standards for the imaginary
I
2-6
I
J
x
surfaces. The airport layout plan may also include an approach and
clear zone layout drawing. The approach and clear zone drawing
typically shows areas under the imaginary surfaces as defined by FAA
Part 77, existing and ultimate approach slopes, plan and profile of
the clear zones and approach areas, and the location and elevation
of obstructions exceeding criteria in FAR Part 77. It is recommended
that an airport layout plan drawing be prepared prior to preparation i
of an airport height-hazard zoning ordinance.
An aerial photomap of the airport and its environs or a United ,
States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map, 7.5 minute series,
may be used for a base map. It is fairly easy to relate natural fea-
tures, landmarks, or manmade objects to the imaginary surface using
these maps. Any terrain or objects extending through the imaginary ,
I
surfaces can be identified.
Appendix A is a model height-hazard zoning ordinance. Some
changes may be necessary to meet specific local requirements. Chapter
Four describes the process for implementing an airport height-hazard
ordinance in accordance with the Airport Zoning Act.
Safety Hazards
this section briefly discusses hazards associated with smoke,
glare, reflection, birds, and electronic interference. The recom-
mended height-hazard toning ordinance provides for control of these
hazards in all zones (see Appendix A, Section 5).
Smoke
Smoke generated by industrial activities within the immediate
1 2-7
i
1
111" low
.
I
t
I
II
1
~ E%IIIi3IT I t
a
EFFECTS DF NOISE ON PEOPLE
(Residential Land Uses Only)
i
v
Elltttal 1{nela~ Speatib ,
~ lsea lalerlerente Annoyaacel N
General Caatatstnky
lafaae llalfossr Average Altllade To*arfa r
Malaate M Cotaraoalr' Area
Aeaaie Q.Itt"" ilk Jkoestim Melera lot Reacliall
6wof land Deatal/Ilo~ Hallam 96% siseleaee % of ropolalia
IN oeelbela WWI I41ellig ty Isi6kly AaaayN3
May behia
TS and 19 9 11% very Noise is blrly to be the moll im
above Occin 111 • 0s severe adverse as poruor of all
ptcts of fhe community taaronmus 1
Will Na
TO Likely 991h 0.Y Is% Severe Noise it one of the muse im
Occur aspects of she community envaironmens ~rse
°a W d1
6s Nos 100% L3 IN9 Srpufhant Noise is one of the important adverse
Occur a+peeb of Ike tommunity environment
Will
60 Not 100% 10 Y% Moderate Noise may be considered an adverse specs
Occur of the community environment.
Will to
j $s read aNor 100% ] S elk Slight Noise considered no more important than
below
vanous other envuonmenrsl (actors
1. "Spte,h loserfercnce" data are dra+n bum the fullov,sns labks in 4 Agnadcv nr tiAct tsun a,ou,n, Ixtnr+c,u muddy du+ Nonr at lu•
LPA's "I evch Ikscvrmcm": Table s. 1 tp 1) I. I's Is 1, Iyt IL 1. All Icvcl, can stall he an rmlxntaul prnbk n, panhulJdy rhta it murtde, m
whet Joa born Nalruaal Madcmy of 1,ten.e 1917 return Ina ytuN cnrnnnuteM.
lur l'rcparinl I.avitunm,utal larpa,l Malcrttcnl+ son Niue. kerknt nl
WoelnrR (aatP 6904 Lvalo4lw0 u1( avw,nmentul ImpJ,s ul Nutw."
NOM Nrseuch unpheaa noise is a factor producing wets reLrrJ i
I. Ikpend, on auilstdes and other factors. htahh ciftus such is head douse, hqh bluoJ pressvte anJ
I. The M'rctnlales of people reporun/ annoyance to ksva clients are suuke. Well. and other dileurve disorder The letatron,h ps be
krlhei nt ach use. An ualaura small ptrunlap of people will upoil been none and thew slltcr, huwever, have nw as yet h„ n
berm "hilhly Anna>ed" even in shot qurelest turroun mIs One reasu4 quattl4ed
n rheJdbtulty AN propk have in Inteylauol annoyan,e u+er it very boil
time,
i
CMWI INFS FOR CONSIDERING NOISE IN IAND IISF PiANNINTr ANTI COFIIRgI, D,S. DrpJOilwnl of Trtns- J
I
e:
}
r
k
EXHIBIT III
i
f
COMPARATIVE NOISE LEVELS
T- !cal decibel (d8A values encountered in dail life and Indus
tr
Rustling leaves dBA
Room in a quiet
Soft dwelling at midnight 20
+ whispers at five feet 32
I Men's clothing department of large store 34
Window air conditioner 53 1
55
2 1
HHouseholConversatdidonal
large store
Busy restaurant 60
62
` Typing pool {nine tJOewriters in use) 65
65
f Vacuum cleaner in private residence (at 10 feet) 6
Ringing alarm clock (at two feet)
9
Loudly reproduced orchestral music in large roam 80
82 {
` Over 85 d8A be inn in of hearin
dame a tf colon ed I
I
d8A'
Printing press plant (medium size automatic) v
Heavy city traffic 86
Heavy diesel-propelled vehicle (about 25 feet awa 92
I Air grinder y) 92
Cut-off saw 95
Home lawn mower 97
Turbine condensor 97
98
150 cubic foot air compressor 100
Banging of steel plate
Air hammer 100
Jet Airliner (500 feet overhead) 107
115
~
1
Source; IMPACT OF NoiSE ON PEOPLE, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Aviation Administration, May 1917,
1 ~
2-9
I
1
I
1
r
e '
'r ;'y 11a
1-w
1
I p I (~1614fo. J! nu IW orm NP:unN
✓ / rr14 J WI M 011 Rx lol U 1Y 11111Y
I I w V'yyY ~Mlp.Y !x111 ~11Vi• w Yn.
r ` 1' I~ ~ f NLL 411. M 1 r Iw• 1iM r
• I ~ v} J: fr1 Yr RTr Mil Mrl fJYYI •'lr' W Irllr M [u
r 111 Ir r~ [111 Y ![wJ r cr1R11N y IY Ys all
Ylrr: 1 rll r Rr'W 1[r ry MM x1111 rrl,
~ ♦R r Y41\ YM.
1 f- ~:irW Itr JA Il[`w1 M ~,y ^J M
' + 1Y Yw r~ y lY CI[f J Y1w
w . r ✓ • lY ~ IILMr 1r!•M[w MIIY IYI.oI I~/[WwN
r
r rM r ~I~j iiw1•l[J ll W. f.~j 1~ 11r'v lY dr nll r r.l /+1
l T r1r111 Yq rrr [Wf Nrld1 t.1w.
~./1 M 1111 I r R[PrJ b r IIr ow k MJ r L r1.J M W M
I ~ y V"1y.j ~ l[M Rn kr }d 11 [rYw
Mllr IMY {W N n1Ra
J r P1T111 4w1►'lyr [lW rl/uLLlr.
{VI ✓ ~ W1114 1. R'rVrr v .1•I. wl.AIY [1
Yw .1 IY II Rfl R[lrnl 1. 111Y11 Ir rr/ fl
VJNat•.1,111 ~ I i ~L[ . i.r• (~r1y1 rr wl lJr Ilr. Wlr ly1 M lY lY IMN U [br P IY Iw W N
j `1 ~ 111 rlr rMllw J lY Ir-
1 11x1111. ►l .1111 r11111Y x111 RI wl[11 yr'
1d
<41
16
l ~
Y
I
1'1lOGI S ! 3 Ir.a.+l "RTKM
-"f C5 as
~ } r ' ! 1 ppUTNT vmvgv A !21
1 pc 014 ~gMITY T[MAf {
Off
.iw 1
~yr
~c.Tfus 41:41
- .1• N1I1'!) 11 1411
'1 [ Ylra M M 'x. i
rx11 rr r.rn Rll . ~ M
N..r..~,.,1 [•yl bl.
I ~
I
tr low
R ,
I ATTACHMENT 3
I
C1 ry of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, texas 76201
I
MEMORANDUM
To: Frank Robbins, Executive Director, Planning and Development
II From: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager
Date: October 23, 1989
i
Subject: Hartlee Field Airport
Several members of the Airport Board discussed the planned purchase of
Hartlee Field Airport. Hartlee has operated as a private airport since
1943.
The major question to be answered is the operation of a public/private
airport by the new owners? As an airport it needs to have clear zones
on the North and South Ends in order to keep people from building right
up next to the approaches of Runway 17 and 35.
If a clear zone is not used, the problem will become the City's in the
future.
I
There may be questions that need to be asked to the F.A.A. and T.A.C.
Please tali John Anderson of the F.A.A, at 817-624-5797 or Clay Wilkins
of the T,A.C, at 512-476-9262.
If you have any queationas please contact me at extension 8419,
.•.C/i ool
Joe Thompson
f cc Rick Svehla
k
3-1
TT T
Sr[.
f y
4
a
i
ATTACHMENT 4
SECTION VI
GENERAL PAVINGo GRADING AND DRAINAGE
REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. GENERAL
All alignments, right-of-way and street dimensions shall
conform to the 1986 Denton County Transportation Plan and the
Denton County Geometric' Design Standards (Recommended Design
Elementl. All interior subdivision streets shall be a minimum
RR2 standard with 4-ft. shoulders in a 60-ft, right-of-way.
Street construction will be either asphalt or reinforced
concrete pavement in accordance with the following chart.
Construction of all roads in and adjacent to the subdivision
shall be in conformance to the following specifications.
The developer of a subdivision shall be responsible for the
cost of the construction of all roads in the development,
whether or not the streets were already county roads.
I
TOTAL NO. OF LOTS ~r"PE PERIMETER
IN SUBDIVISION - OF IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL GROSS AC. PAVEMENTS IN
IN PROPERTY PRIOR SUBDIVISION
TO SUBDIVIDING
1.0 OVER 50 LOTS) - PAVING DRAIN,".GE
1.0 UNDER 50 LOTS( - DRAINAGE
0.75-1.0 (20-100 LOTS) HMAC DRAINAGE
0.7551.0 (UNDER 20 LOTS DOUBLE PENETRATION DRAINAGE
0.7561.0 (OVER 100 LOTS CONCRETE/HKAC PAVING/DRAINAGE
<0.75 DOUBLE PENETRATION DRAINAGE
j
B. Governing Technical Specification
The govern nq -technical specifications for all con-
struction in Denton County shall be the 1992 Standard
S ecifications for Construction of Highway a Streets and er d es
prepared by the Texas State Department of Highways and Publ c
Transportation. This publication will hereinafter be referred
to as the "yellow book" with all parenthetical item number
references being from that publication. The following requir-
ements and specifications are intended as a general guide and
do not relieve the developer from conformance to the yellow
book.
I
4-1
r -.q
z
( 'k d±
i
C. Grading
1. Preparing Aiaht-of-Way
10 1
The developer shall prepare the right-of-way
for construction operations by the removal and
F1 disposal of all obstructions from the right-of-way
and from designated easements (Item 1
2. Roadway Excavation
The developer shall excavate within limits of
the roadways remove, utilize, and/or dispose of
all excavated material and constrict, shape and
finish all earth work along the entire length of
all roadway(s) (Item 110).
3. Roadway Embankment
The developer ahnll construct all embankment in
layers approximately parallel to the finished grade
of the roadway. The embankment shall be constructed
to the grade and typico. sections shown on the plans
Iltem 132.)
D. PAVING
1. CONCRETE PAVEMENT
I 3
A. GENERAL
Pavement shall be a minimum of 6-inches thick
s utilizing number 3 bars (grade 60) on 18-inch
centers both ways. Six inch monolithic curbs
shall be utilized. Construction expansion and
saoad dummy joints shall be utilized in, the 1
k construction of the pavement (Item 360).
B. STVZNGTH:
l
Twenty-tight (28) day compressive strength
shall be 3000 psi (and/or 7-day center-point
flexural strength of 500 psi).
i
1
f
1 .
4-2
i
I
E +
p C. SUBGRADE
The subgrade shall be installed under the finished
pavement and extended two feet beyond the edg: of
pavement and shall be lime stabilized with Type A
Hy9rated Lime in the amount of 61 by unit dry weight
of the subgrade (approximate application rate of 27
lbs. of lime per square yard) to a depth of six
inches unless the developer submits test results from
an independent laboratory. When such test results
are available, the percent by weight of hydrated lime
required shall be as followsi
PLASTICITY INDEX (PI)PERCENT LIME REQUIRED
OVER. 25 5
21 - 25
15-20 4
j 14 - or less 0
D. REINFORCING STEEL:
Reinforcing steel shall be number 3 bars (grade 60)
on 10-inch centers both ways (Item 440).
2. ASPHALT PAVEMENT
A. GENERAL
h
The subdivider has the option of either a 2-course
penetre`',on asphalt surface treatment or 3 inches
y of hot wix asphaltic concrete pavement.
B. 807_F,IX ASPEALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT (HKAC)_
1. Finished PaveseItI
The su lv der will construct a finished
pavement composed of a coarse grade surface
course on a prepared base course on a stabilized
subgrade. Pavement shall be constructed in
conformance with SDHPT (Item 340).
2. As halt oils and Emulsions:
Aspha t C cement to a AC- . Tack or primer coat
to be MC-30 or MS-2 applied at a minimum rate of
0.20 gallons per square yard. Emulsified asphalt
may be used if approved by the individual
Commissioner. (Item 3)0.)
f
i
4-3
1
i
3. Coarse Grade Surface Course
This will consist of a three (3) inch thick
application Eor the full width and length of the
roadway in accordance with Item 340, type "C".
4. go grade
The subgrade shall be
above. the same as concrete pavement
5• Base Course
The bas u;se shall be extended two feet beyond the
edge of pavement each side and shall be constructed
Grade flexwible
compactedrtolatminimum
of 951 of TEX 113-E t method at a moisture
content at least two points wet of optimum moisture ,
content. In some instances, additional compacted
depth may be required. (Item 218).
C. Two Course Surface Treatment
l Finished Pavement
The subdiv der will construct a wearing surface
composed of two applications of asphaltic material,
each covered with aggregrate, constructed on a
prepared base course on a stabilized subgrade.
Pavement shall be constructed in accordance with
SDHPT (Item 322).
~I
2 Asphalt, oils, and Moulsions
SDHPT Item 00 Asphalt Cement for two-course surface
I treatment is recommended to be AC-30 for ease of
application. AC-20 is also acceptable. rate of 0.3 to 0.4 gallons Apply at ~I
course and 0.25 gallons per square yard for first
courses. Prime coat to bper e MC-30 roryMS-2farppli at a
Em
minimum ra ulsifiedtasphal' gallonsepeifsare ! a
t may be ioner, yard.
individual Commiss
approved by the
3. A 212re ate for Surface Treatment
andpahallm Type D., Gra a s all b
be applied to the full length andswidth
of roadways,
The su redee
shall be the same as concrete
pavement above.
5, Base I The base urse shall be the same as asphalt
pavement above.
4-4
I
60600060600 00
f * 0 0
- •.,,2846 000000000000
i
i
I
1
VIC BURGESS
COUNTYJUDGE
i
Y
! 1
November 20, 1989
The Honorable Buddy Cole
County Commissioner, Precinct One
110 w. Hickory
Denton, Texas 76201
RE: Hartlee Field Project
i
Dear Buddy:
I have watched the progress of the above ref~~e~coedtproject with
great interest and would like to add my suppo
ThA economic imQact of such an undertaking will be of great
benefit to both the city
Eco ton county
and the county. This project is similar to ones Economic oDevelopment utlined and addressed at our recent Den
I
I also take great pride in the fact that this will srcure the
preservation of yet another historic site within our county
sion.
project long addressed by the Denton County Historic Commis
r~
i support this undertaking and stand ready to assist in any way.
Please relay the interest of my office to all parties involved in
this wor by project.
Sin lyr
Vic Burgess
County Judge
i
VB
i
. i1 383-0298 • 1.800-346-3E
COUNTY H CKORY * DEKON, 0 1EA8 76201 V
1 $0 09
i
BUDDY COLE
COMMISSIONER
COMMISSIONERS COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
COURT H)USE0N THE SOUARE
pOVY HICKORY
DEntO%, TEXAS 7!201
Min 0531,6 WTI '107 Axe
(I In
a>s}22.0 a+nSaS1765
nnsuioMp
November 21, 1989
~ The Honorable Ray Stevens
Mayor, Denton, Texas
215 East McKinney
1 Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Rays
My personal thanks to you and your fellow Council members in
consideration of the Hartlee Field Project. It has been my
pleasure to work with this group of individuals whose plan for
reclamation of this historic site is one of great foresight and
j diligence.
After talking with employees of the National and State Registry's
in both Fort Worth and Austin, 1 have come to more completely
i understand what an involved undertaking this is and how important
it is to calculate each step in the process to insure success.
Attached you will find letters from State Land Commissioner,
Garry Mauro; State Senator, Steve Carriker; State Representative,
Ben Campbell; State Representative, Jim Horn; County Judge, Vic
Burgess, and, Bill Holt of ~he office of Economic Development,
Denton Chamber of Commerce. Each expresses his interest and
support of the project. i am pleased to present copies of these
letters for your consideration and for the official record.
Sincerely,
J l I
li Buddy C e
be/pbk
Attachments (6)
CC: Members, Denton City Council
I J
i
r~
November 16, 19s9
The Honorable Buddy Cole
110 West Hickory
Denton, Texas 76201-4116
Dear Commissioner Cole:
I have recently been made aware of the Hartlee Field Project in
Denton County and am supportive of it for several reasons.
As Chairman of the Veterans Land Board and a member of the Texas
Antiquities Committee, I fully support the Veterans who propose to
purchase and build their homes on this historic site as they seek
to attain historic recognition for this property.
The Veterans Land Program'has funds available to assist Veterans
who desire to purchase land and homes through the Program and we
will be happy to assist them in obtaining the necessary financing.
This is a positive economic development for Denton and the State
• of Texas. If you need my help in any other way, please let me
4 know.
Sincerely,
I
,
G rry a o
Texas commissioner
GM/JG/1
i
Garry Mauro
Commissioner
General Land Office
Vepnen F. Austin Swilling
17W North Conquers Avenue
Austin, teas 18701
J1Z a6tStS6
'The ' 4$mate of I[40 Mate of &Xne
Sensto Dkuut Is 0. OOK 12068
30 $irwn . plnrriker Austin, Texas ~er 78711
5121463-0130
Archer
Baylor
Glhnan November 20 r 1969
rAildre s
Cloy
Cooks
t.-ittle
Denton lnorth) The Honorable Buddy Cole
Dlckeno Ctmu,ty Commissioner Precinct One
Fisher
110 W. Hickory
card Denton, Texas 76201
Grayson
Hndemen
Harlon Dear Buddys
Jack
j JOnti abank you for providing me with information on the Hartlee
I Ke01 Field roect dur
Klny p j irtg my recent visit to Denton. The Historic
Kno■ and Economic connotations of this project are far reaching
Mitchell and styuld benefit not only the city and county but also our
Montague
Motley great state. As an aviator, I look forward to touring the
Scurry planned nuseun.
Shockal,ord
Stonewall
l Throckmorton Please inform those at the city and county level of my into-rest
Wichita and support of this project. I will be happy to be of,any
Wllbarper assistance to see that such a laudable project becomes a
Young reality.
Sincerely,
teven A. Carriker
State Senator
SACAS
I
I
i
P.O. Boa 517
A ob} , Tsw e179543
915-776-2358
I
i
i
3740 `mh Jwee Lne
r.0. &a 1910 } J / suite 110
Auwin. Tama, 76766.5910 Ca roUtm. Teeu 750074415
S I 1 463 0476 114.394-1994
Jurn Campbell
*fat( Arprrtirntatibr
November 17, 1989
Commissioner Buddy Cole
110 W. Hickory
Denton, Texas 76201 1
Re: Hartlee Field Project
Dear Commissioner Cole!
Thank you for bringing the Hartlee Field Project to {
my attention! It is my opinion that it would have a positive
impact on Denton County.
I
i am supportive of the developement project as proposed.
Hartlee Field is a part of the historical heritage of Denton i
County, and in my opinion should be preserved. 1
i If there is anyway I can help or be of service on this
E ! profect, Please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
I' l
Hen Campbell
State Representative, Dist 61 f
i
BCfkl
I
I
i i
E
Committee,.
Country AHain, Vitt Chairman
5cienae 6 Technolop
'rexasHouse of Representatives
~j P0. Box 2910 STATE REPRESENTATIVE
.4urin. Tam 781692910
(!12) 16!0!91 im `Horn
J
1OS La(rland P1a:a
Lrwmdlr, Trras 7!067
t~ (214) 221277!
Denton (817)!66.1720
November 21, 1989
To whom it may concern:
i It is my understanding that a group of verterns wish to
j locate at the Hartlee Field Airport in Denton County.
Although I am not familiar with the details of this
project, it does seem like a unique adAition t-) Denton
County.
This project would certainly be'a major part of Denton
County's Historical Preservation Program and deserves the
full attention of everyone involved.
ff can do to help with
G If there is an7259
this projects pleasesentative
JH:bdk
r~
1
it
1
VIC BURGESS
COUNTY JUEIGE !
! l
November 20, 1989
The Honorable Buddy Cole
County Commissioner, Precinct One
110 W. Hickory
Denton, Te•cas 76201 j
RE: Ha:tlee Field Project
Dear Buddy:
I have watched the progress of the above referenced project with
great interest and would like to add my support to it.
The economic impact of such an undertaking will be of great {
j benefit to both the city and the county. This project is similar
to ones outlined and addressed at our recent Denton County
Economic Development Conference.
I also take great pride in the fact that this will secure the
M preservation of yet another historic site within our county, a
project long addressed by the Denton County Historic Commission.
I support this undertaking and stand ready to assist in any way.
Please relay the interest of my office to all parties involved in {
this wor by project.
Sin ly,
i Vic Burgess
f County Judge
I I
VB
COUNTYCOURTOFDENTONCOUNTY eCOURTHOUSE-0NTHESOUARE
110 W. HICKORY • DENTON, TEXAS 76201 . 16171 383 0206 s 1.600.346 3169
01,i'i(,V of
f'Conomie Development
A'
November 21, 1989
Commissioner Buddy Cole
110 W. Hickory
Denton, 'Cexas 76201
Dear Buddy:
This letter has reference to our discussion concerning
Hartlee Field. I
j Denton's economic developpment effort is enhanced by our
i quality of life. In addition neconomic d
of evelopment.
locations,tourism is a big part
Maintaining Hartlee Field for the purpose of historical
preservation of aircraft will attract visitors to Denton.
The fact that Denton understanels the necessity to
maintains such facilities demonstrates that our community
is striking a good balance between quality of life issues
and growth.
Hartlee Field is important to Denton and retaining its
community. example of our commitment
if.tolfis a
to a well balanced Your truly,
o .
11 Ho
Director Economic Development
I
i~
i
4
i p
F
i
it
y '
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
i
r
i
i
~I
~ I
j I
I I
II
I
I
I
I
j
r:.
DATEtll/21/89
tr~/
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUHJECI't CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FLAN
RECO*%N nA'r ION t
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (6-0).
SUMMARYi
A resolution adopting a five year Capital Improvement Plan and a
/ five year general gcvernment capital improvement schedule.
Voluminous and detailed information and maps, including operation
and maintenance costa are available in the City Manager's office.
BACKGROUNDt
See the attached memo for a chronology of the process leading to the
CIP's adoption to date.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEOI
The entire community.
FISCAL IMPACTt
l Utility rate and ad valorem tax increases to fund debt service are
increasing.
I
Operation and maintenance coats will increase marginally. These
will be funded from current revenues.
Respec y youbb itt
Pre ared byt Lloyd Harre11aid 11 City manager
.
Frank H. obbins, AICP
Executive Director
' for Planning and Development
2011x
I~
CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Taxes 76201
MEMORANDUM
DA'CE: November 9, 1999
TU: Mayor and City Council Members
THRU: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Frank H. Robbins, Executive Director for
Planning and Development
I SUBJECT: 1994-19J99 GCAV ENERAL GOVERNMENTTCIPxSCHEDULEIP) AND THE
'CITE CIP
E 'rho CiP recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and
I the Public Utilities Board is a proposed schedule of future
capital improvements to be carried out during fiscal 1989t
s
through fiscal 1994 listed by category together with co
estimates and the anticipated means of financing each project.
Additionally, P6Z has recommended a five year General
j Government CIP schedule, from fiscal 1995 to fiscal 1999,
equipment thatoismreiativelyelargeeinasize,plexpensiveaandilongr
lasting.
THE BENEFITS OP A C1r
An effective capital improvements programming process can lead
to many benefits. Specifically, the CIP can ensure that plans
for
proposalsntoybeatestedeagainstaarset oft policies; canlnbetterent
I
I
- -
,
Memo to Mayor and City Council
Norember 9, 1989
Page 2
schedule public improvements that require more than one year to
construct; can provide an opportunity, assuming funds are
available, to purchase laud before costs go up; can provide an
opportunity for long-range financial planning and management;
can help stabilize tax and utility rates through careful debt
management; can avoid such mismanagement as paving a street one
year anti tearing it up the next to build a sewer; can offer an
opportunity for citizens and public interest groups to
participate in decision making; and can contribute to a better
overall management of city affairs.
fliB PROCHSS OF DEVELOPING THE CIF 1
.l
February 7, 1989 - Council approved the CIP schedule of
events,
February 8, 1989 - PUB and P$Z hold joint meeting and
Public }tearing.
4 February-March - Staff prepares list of projects.
Projects ranked. CUBG Committee makes
its recommendation for CIP Items funded
by CDBG funds.
April 12, 1989 - Pf,Z reviews staff proposal for General
Government CIP. PUB review Utility CIP.
j April 26, 1989 - Ps,Z reviews entire CIP,
May 10, 1989 - P4Z recommends 1989-1994 CIP.
3
May, June, July - Staff reviews detailed fiscal Impacts
of CIP and proposes a new CIP to
includo a 10 year plan for General
Government.
June 27, 1989 - Revised CIP discussed with Council
during Special Budget Session; as part
of Major Issues Report.
August 23, 1989 - Revised CIP discussed by P&Z.
September 130 1989 - P4Z holds a public hearing and
1 recommends a revised CIP with a 5 year
it Schedule for General. Government.
Novewber 7, 1989 - Council work session.
'the development of this year's CIP was much longer than usual.
The proposals reprosent one which has undergone a great deal of
financial scrutiny between May and August.
}
Memo to Mayor and City Council
I November 9, 1989
► Page 3
SUMMARY
Chis attached CIP and Schedule are much less aggressive than
the one P$Z recommended in May, 1989. It stretches the General
Government 1986 Bond Election five year plan to eight years and
the P&Z's May 10 plan from five (5) to ten (10) years for
General Government projects, It extends the Utility CIP as
well. Since P4Z made Its recommendation on May 10th, the
operation and maintenance and debt service impacts and growth
projections have been reviewed in great detail, particularly
wit respect to the next two budget years. A financially
conservative approach to the CIP is being expressed with this
CIP.
ATTACHMENCS/TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
1. 1989-90 to 1993-94 Capital Improvement Plan. Page 1
2. 1994.1995 to 1998-99 General Government
Capital Improvement Schedule. Page 32
3. Last year's General Government CIP
with a column showing where the project
is in this year's CIP. Page 38
4. General Government CIP Comparison Chart. Page 43
5. Utility Department Executive Summary. Page 44
6. P&Z Minutes Page 53
I
I
ran 0 T-11 CF
dw
Attachments
{ 2010x
LJ
I
C +
rtarRAL coerRN~ItNT
CAPITAL 81PJO5'1'1Rq PLAN
RMSM
1959.90 November 17, logo
PRDiCT ►t'NDING SOURCL
BOLD 196Q BONDS
ruTvie ,
IWNDS {
BOND , OR Co 's 1 0711to i TOTAL MARKS
6TRLETS
Loop 266; ►M 426 to 1-30,.
1 Banat divided. 114,317,070 $14,347,670 SDW►T, Began In 88.69.
TM till (Tessteyl: 1.35 to
2 miles south, Widen to 4
lanes, Rilht•cf-vas and access, 120,000
$4,714.2:4 1{,7;4,271 108►T. 1110 Bond Election,
L'nivtrslty Drive Landscaping;
1.35x to Helont, i
1120,700 1117,4;0 1331,150 1195 Bond felt. State Hatth. V
,
fldewalkt 1101,911 68;,763
11171690 1115 Bond salt.
I ( 1160 Bond Election, I
Design Rottlnghae toad $50,000
i
630,000 1160 Bond Election
Dovntovn Closed Loop slpula,
tMa l1 /100,000 tJJ7,600 r
1433,000 1160 Bond Election,
Scripture Rtbuild: 1.35 to
Bannle Brae 17Y1,907 i
6341,tOT 1995 Bond late,
W, oak lelwlld: 1.35 to
Bonnie Brae l207,67G
!207,670 1960, bond Bale,
W.f. 317 lot. Worth Dr.), 1.35
to 11130, Widen to foar lanes
and N ght•of•vey, tnglntaring
` for 1.35 to Colllnt. t5J,0o0
17,727,000 $3,770,000 logo Bond Election
CATt09BT TOTAL
I /678,391 1511,765 125,016,334 610,470,01)
i
i
'Avenue A.. Avenue 1, Stuatt, Pershing, Glenwood, Hickory, Sctlplw e.
fast 1
J,
1
i
t
b
a9NI9Al OOYIRNKINS
SAlITAL 1K110YIMINT 1LAN 19VISID,
Lill-90 October it, ifel
lNO91C1 IUNDINO SOURCI
$OLD ; Ilea ; I"MIR ROM I ; ;
lOND9 ; 1OND j OR CO'! ; OTNRR ; TOTAL j I9KAIKS
DRAINACI
Its and Locust Drain Inlets 160,000 160,000 1150 bond $ale.
Alexander btteet Drainage -
lbaae 1 107,000 107,000 CDIO
Stuart/lunnydals Orainalo 1350,000 1350,000 1966 bond Ilaction
molly Kill Area Drainage 1300,000 1300,000 1060 fond llactlun
CATROO1T TOTAL 100,000 1650,000 107,000 1111,000 16
i
AIIPOAS
' Infield Drainsit 1333,000 1333,000 1919,700 IAA crant;
~ 133,300 fwd balance
TOTAL 1!]1,791 91,191,713 190, a 6,331 191,515.513
TOTAL Ci► 1917 1SIDANre 11,111,111 lap 9
1
r
5
i
yy a
i ~
CINIIIAL COVIRM ANT
CAPITAL IMPROVIMtNT PLAN RIVIIlO7 -
1990-91 November 11, 1199
PROIICT FUNDING SOCRCR
..................................................1.......... ......•...................i.................................................
SOLD 1160 BONDS l
BOND! BOND ; OR Co's ' MRS. ; TOTAL MARKS
, ;
1TRIITI
Nottingham: Ixtenslon to mouth
and sidewalks 1 6470,400
1170,400 1960 Bond gectlon
IM till (Teasley) landscaping 1100 000 1170,000 1100,000 1100 Bond glection State Keith,
CA7tCORT TOTAL 1000,100 1100,000 $700,400
i
DRAINACS
Ft, North Drivellamem Street
Drainage 190,000
500,000 1060 1 bcllon
PARK$ I
North Lakes Athletic 1960 ylectlon.
k
field Development 64;01000 1
60J0,000 11;0,000 Other; Possible stmte
matching grant,
PI'IL1C SAPSTT
Law Inforceman./Court Complex
Dealp52 1200,ODO 1200,000 1190 Bond Isl.
TOTAL 1200,000 11,110,100 1030,00 !1,170,/00
i
TOTAL CIP DIST isstracl 11,240,100
'May be delayed,
2fncludea Apace study for all City Offlcee.
Page 3
Y
CENTkAI. OOYPANNPNT
CAPITAL INPROVFAPNY KAN pfY19EDt
1991•9! Autuat 1, 1989
PROJM 7 PUNDINo wart
......................................I..~M..
.i...........................................................
SOLD 1116 ..T~R
BOND
J 'OR Do's = OTNtR I TOTAL ! REMAINS
S~09=
sTRf.17S .
t,0010 18111 US 7AO to Colorado.
Widen to 1 inner, NI;AL•ah Ry 111,100 19,111,096 19,151,118 Others SPHPf III$ load
Ilectlem.
1-75[5 North of Hickory creel
to US 17. Widen to 6 lanes 111,611,111 611,611,111 /DNPf
Inte►attlon control Sltnol. 1115,000 1116,000 1091 bond Ileotlen
NilJONOtd Iltewy/Jlderalh 610O.D00 9100,000 1191 bond election
Turn Lance for Artrrlal■ 609 190,000 1091
I lord R1ec11on
ff 1t, rarlA or. IU.S, 371II I•35 to Collins - Pheae 1 1150,000 9150,000 1096 bond Ilectlon
r Ie+katrlu /ltnale 170,000 ,000 1991 bond Rlecllon
630,000
CATeO0pY TOTAL
1111,600 6111,000 171,617,191 671,611,191
1
PIRA I N Ace
j
Cooper Crook Channel 6150,000 1160,000 1191 " election
Preen Creek Drs batei
lradahar to 9uddeil 6150,000 1150,000 1991 bond tlectlon
CATI00RY TOTAL
61, 000, 000
11,000,000
I
i
i Pqe /
i
i
.
a~aua A
r
I
II
DfNOAA6 (X)Y1RNMFNT
CAPITAL tNPROUMCNT PLAN Rf.Y191D1
' 1991.97 An[usl i, I9R9
PROJG'1 FUNDING SOURCE {
I
BOLD NT
t 1996
- -I URC WOOS
I .
I N1N0.1 I IOND I
I ON Co'B I OTHER I TOTAL = IWARKS
f ~ PAM AND A7CRLA1tON
NortMut Recrestlon Center 11,500,0001
11, X9,000 1111 Bond tleetion
PUBLIC SAFETY
i
Lsr tnfnrcewnr CesleNCosN
Cwples, PNae I 11,000,000 ..17,000,000 1946 Bo,d flectlon
fQTAL
51,500,000 11,117,600 51,145,000 171,415,114 171,191,191 I
TOTAL COP of" ISSUANCE
65,!01,400
1468 1 no cost for lend.
I
I ,
i
hp S
I
r low
CrNIRtl. COVEN "ENT
CANTAL 1NC8n1'III[',vT PLAN
1992.93 R[VlstOt
Aualat r, lass
PROJECT
t SOLD I iied I nlu11 BONDS I
t BONDs.
I
,
i BOND i 01 Co's I OTMT1 i TOTAL I
Rllurn
us 340: vtaa Co, to 2.39.
1 !Dodd rr,dlrldad.
Orlola elrpt laconatruetloo 1:11120,000 129,720,000 Could be datayod by ED19T
and Illaral!
1131,111 With 281 laproraaant.
/ofl Word. Dr.t 1.35-Collins, 1139,111 told " llatuen
Phaq 12
1+00,000 1500,400 1180 bond Elrttlon
Elraat Conatructlo0/100onalruction
17:0,000 17:0,000 1q1 Iord
. Ilactlon
i tA1EQOlT TOTAL
1431,111 17:0,000 129,120,000• ••131,101,111
i
t DUIRA01
LccO gat by Drainage
102:,000
I62s,404 With Zee i.proraaane.
1ln,Arlrh4r DralnaRr 1111 bond 1lattion
I7S,000 17:,400 With all iaprovesmt.
0001ar Crab DrainA/a 1191 bond Eloclion
►haaa 1 t
1:00,600 I:D0,000 MI Boni itaotlon
I
Page b
I
I
r
F 7` r
CINUAL GOVIRNMINT
CAPITAL IMPROYRMINT FLAN 19YISID:
1113.97 Septoober 21, 1981
PRO)ICT FUNDING SOVRCI
.O . BONDS
S 1ONDS i logo , ON Co's OTNIR i T07AL '
MARKS
DW NACI (continued)
Wilson, MorM9, Alexander area
lralnap• . pUaaa if 1126,000 9121,000 1911 kaw] tlectlon or CD10
Avenue C Drainage 1100,000 1100,000 1991 Bond llectlon
Pecan Creek Downtown 1laater Plan 1+1,000 151,000 1191 land election
Pecan Creak lraAnage near
loborteoo 1+00 000 1-400,000 loll Bond election
j
CATSGOIY tOTAL
1),7
9670 000 ^1,000 11,171,000
PUBLIC !Aptly
lAw lnforCo"nt/Court Couples
Pb&" II 9100,000 1400,000 logo Sand election {
LIPRAIY
Construct Library 9000,000 1100,000 1700,000 1180 good election,
!fate Match possible. I
[1'l~ rOTAL !2,201,111 92,101,004 121,920,000 fJl,lae,lll I
4 101AL CIF DRIT ISSUANCA {
f! 91,7ce,u1
' I
i
Page 7
t~~ J Jim'-i>lp,
y
1I~ V
I
1 9
Of.NER A 1. Of14E RNkRN1
CAPITAL IMPROTEMENt PLAN
1993-94 NE9ISEn:
August T, 1999
PRwEtT
rUNAINO aOVRCE
J 9oLA J loll FUTURI eoNAa RD1A11La.._...._.___...
S BONDS J .J = J
IONA J 04 cola J OTBEI J MAL
~ fll 426 fikllanror 1.4 al tea
rent or Ill to 1.1 allies east
or sal. wide" to 1 lane,
dIvIdad. Others lONPT
16,176,100 16,176,100 Corld bo delayed by RUPT
I,andarape fntnnceraye 1 610,000 5160,000 1200,000 111114 Pond Ilacl
Arterial Torn Lanes loo, state patch I
6100,000
tlRaala 1100,000 tool load Blectloa
i
1776,000
aldwalYo/lllerala 106,000 loll load llectioa
I
1lreet Coaalruceloa/Reconaeractloa 1100,000 1100,000 1991 Pond alactloa
{
Yntaoad Patla! 1150'000 6260,000 1991 pond /lortioa
,11]
Oober !creel ParlaR 1176,000 1135,000 lost Pond tlection
.._.......00 $111,000 1111 Pond Ilettioa
'r CATIOIIIIT TOTAL _
1160,000 11,031,000 16,315,t00 14,507,100
~ 0lA1MA0l
t
f {I
Pecan Creeli Serial to Yoodroe I
11,000,000 11,000,000 1091 Bond llectloa 11
Pecan Crash aloe/ Ualreralt/
6950,000 6160,000 loll load Blection
IP+obably for Loop 211 rroe 340 to color" and Mcllnmy at Loop 111
r.._:
Pala 1
i ~
1
..4 a1 l1
I ~ n.S al
V 1 j
I
i
GENFRAI. OOYCBNNENT '
CAPITAL (MPROYFNENT PLAN ACY19F0:
1997-91 AuAual i, 1999
PROJCcT
FUNDING SnUita
"•--•-i..__ °
j SOLD
-
~AL
I BON D9 1911 j lt1TURt BONDS
I BOND 1 04 CO's j atNk~
1 REMARKS
F
Caper Creel, PAue III 1500,000
CATCOORT TOTAL 1500,000 1991 Bond Il"tica
` I 11,160,000 •II,T50,000
i
PARRS AND RCCi/.ATIOM
South Recreation Center
ConstructlOe 11,100,0002
` 11,100,000 1911 Bond Blectloo
TOTAL
11,550,000 I9,T11,000 15,715,100 $0.657,100
TOTAL CIO QBT ISSUAKC
11,7=9,000
2Aaa111e8 nn coot for lend acputaltlon
l
f I
t ~
a
i
F
f
pale 9
I
I
rXHIBIY=
01-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
04:18 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
(1 X 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 90
90-EP-O1 Maint, Workshop 6 warehouse 120 120 0 0 0
90-EP-02 Stack Monitoring, All Units 0 0 0 0 0
irk 90-EP-03 Misc. Tools 6 Equipment 40 0 40 0 0
90-EP-04 Misc. Otfice Equipment 15 0 15 0 0
90-EP-05 Spencer Plant Security 35 0 - 35 0 0
90-EP-06 Fire Protection 64 0 54 0 0
90-EP-07 Plant Parking 8 0 8 0 0
90-EP-08 Lok150 116 Hydro Electric 28251 21261 0 0 0
90-EP-09 Ray Roberts Hydro Electric 1,082 19082 0 0 0
90-EP-10 Ray Roberts Hydrocorp PonStock 0 0 0 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 3,605 31453 152 0 0
90-ESL-01 Street Lighting - Residential 73 0 33 40 0
j 90-ESL-02 Street Lighting - Arterial 72 72. 0 0 0
90-ISL-03 Street Lighting - Security Ligh 33 0 33 0 0
90-ESL-04 Motor Pool Replacement 45 0 38 0 7
_
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECT STREET LIGHTS 223 12 104 40 7
I
90-ED-01 0/H Extensions and Improvement 850 850 0 0 0
90-ED-02 uPower Factor Improvements 95 95 0 0 0
j$=j~~Tans orrriraE tEqullpme~gvements $$j 8f1 8 2$ 8
90-ED-05 Motor Pool Replacement 205 0 69 0 136
90-ED-06 Miscellaneous Tools L Equipment 80 0 8o 0 0
90-ED-07 Right-ot-Way Easements 46 0 46 0 0
90-EO-06 Economic Feeder Conductor Ropl. 165 0 165 0 0
90-ED-09 0/H To Underground Conversions 300 0 3000 00 0
90-ED-10 Electric Service Center 0 0 0 0 0
90-ED-11 Purcha!• of Electric facilities 0
9 REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 3,084 2,263 659 26 136
C 70 26 0 0
90-EM-O1 Motors 8 Associated Equipment 92 0 6 0 6
90-EM-02 Replace Unit 05313 10 0 0
90-EK-03 Miscellaneout 1001s 6 Equipment 10 0
90-EM-04 load Management Program 150 150 0 0 0
90-EM-05 Datamattc Meter Equipment 60 0 50
0 6
REVISED SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 318 220 92
Page 10
Y' f
1:.: ..:.AIM
G y
07-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
04:48 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AIO-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 00
90-EC-01 Radio Capacitor Control 22 0 22 0 0
90-EC-OIA Fiber Optics i8 0 t8 0 0
111 90-EC-02 Central Dispatch Center 0 0 0 0 0
90-EC-03 900 MHL Comm. System 25 0 25 0 0
-
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECT COMMUNICATIONS 65 0 65 0 0
90-ES-01 Miscellaneous Tools d Equipment 15 0 15 0 0
90-ES-02 Beautify North Lakes Subs. 10 10 0 0 0
90-ES-03 Replace Unit 05602 13 0 4 0 9
90-ES-04 Battery Replacement T 1 0 0 0
9O-ES-05 Building Shell 30 30 0 0 0
! 90-ES-06 Brazos RTU's 60 0 60 0 0
90-ES-07 Future Sub, Denton Nest 60 60 0 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 175 97 69 0 9
I
90-EMIS-01 Misc. Off. Equip/Furniture 66 0 6R 0 0
90-EMIS-02 Motor Pool - 83 Reliant 06604 14 0 7 0 7
I 90-EMIS-03 Efficiency Incentive Program 0 0 0 0 0
E 90-EMIS-04 New Building 0 0 0 0 0
90-EMIS-06 OIS Map System 200 200 0 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATIO 266 200 66 0 0
REVISED TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1990 CIP 71736 61305 10201 66 166
I
1
Page 11
.'s. Y
*k i J
~ Y
07-Sep-69 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
04:48 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
(s x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 91
91-EC-01 Radio Capacitor Control 40 0 40 0 0
91-EC-02 M13c. Tools 8 Equipment 20 0 20 0 0
91-EC-03 Telephone Interconnect 56 0 65 0 0
91-EC-04 Replace Power Inverter 25 0 25 0 0
91-EC-05 Central Dispatch Center 300 300 0 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECT COMMUNICATIONS 440 300 140 0 0
91-ES-01 Audra Sub. Construction 11000 i,000 0 0 0
91-ES-02 SCADA Equipment Upgrade 60 0 60 0 0
91-ES-03 Screen Airport Sub. 76 76 0 0 0
91-ES-04 Miscellaneous Tools A Equip. 18 0 18 0 0
91-ES-05 Purchase CfAimerctal Mower 6 0 8 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECT SUBSTATIONS 1 151 1 076 76 0 0
91-EMIS-01 M16C. Off. Equip/Furniture 150 0 150 0 0
91-EMIS-02 Motor Pool - 06503/Dodge Pimp 15 0 8 0 7
91-EMIS-03 Efficiency Incentive Program 0 0 0 0 0
91-EMIS-04 GIB Mork Station 40 0 40 0 0
91-EMIS-05 Motor Pool - 83 Reliant 06604 14 0 7 0 7
91-EMIS-07 New Building 488 468 0 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECT ADMINISTRATION 707 488 206 0 4
NET INCREASE/ (DECREASE) OVER ORIGINAL 132 486 (363) 0 7
i
REVISED TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1991 CIP 7,944 6,469 11286 66 143
Page 12
j `
r
j
1
i
OT-Sep-84 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
04:48 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
(S x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN J
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER II
FISCAL YEAR 41 1I
91-EP-01 Repl Demineraliter/Upgrade 8109 350 350 0 0 0 1
91-EP-OIA Stack Monitoring-All Units 260 260 0 0 0
91-EP-02 Misc. Equip. 8 Tools 50 0 60 0 0 1
91-EP-03 Misc. Ottice Equipment 15 0 15 0 0 1
91-EP-04 Burner Satety Contr tUnits 182) 6 0 6 0 0 ,J
91-EP-05 Improve Air Move in Basement 10 0 10 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 691 610 61 0 0
i
91-ESL-01 Street Lighting - Residential 95 39 0 66 0 II~
91-ESL-02 Street Lighting - Arterial 173 113 0 0 0 1
91-ESL-03 Street Lighting - Security Lt 35 -••.-0 35 0 -----0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECT STREET LIGHTS 303 212 35 66 0
i
k 91-ED701 0/H Extensions and improvement 560 550 0 0 0
k 91-ED-02 Power Factor Improvements 100 100 0 0 0
E 91-ED-03 Underground Ext. i improvements 813 813 0 0 0
91-ED-04 Transformers a Equipment 978 97a 0 0 0
91-ED-05 Motor Pool Replacement 153 n 31 0 122
91-ED-06 Miscellaneous Tools i Equipment 90 0 90 0 0
91-EO-O1 Right-of-way Easements 60 0 60 0 0
91-EO-08 Economic Feeder Conductor Repl. 110 0 170 0 0
91-ED-09 0/H To Underground Conversions 300 0 300 0 0
91-ED-10 Mobile Data Terminals, 26 0 25 0 0
91-ED-11 Electric Service Center 600 600 0 0 0 1
91-ED-12 Purchase of Elect Facilities 500 500 0 0 0
_
REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC DISTR18UTION 40329 30641 666 0 122
91-EM-O1 Meters a Associated Equipment 101 TS 32 0 0
91-EM-02 Replace Unit 06301 16 0 6 0 7
91-EM-03 Miscellaneous Tools i Equipment 18 0 16 0 0
91-EK-04 load Management Program 168 155 0 0 0
91-EM-06 Mobile Data Terminals _-.__26 __--_0 26 0 0
.
I
i REVISED SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 323 233 83 0 7
1
i
I
Page 13 f
1I
I
E
OT-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
04:46 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
(i X 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN 1J
N
UMBER PROJECT-DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUCTI O1HER
FISCAL YEAR 92
92-EP-Oi MISC. Power Plant Equip. 8 Tool 60 0 60 0 0
92-EP-02 MISC. Office Equipment 15 0 15 0 0
92-EP-03 Replace Vehicle 05103-83 Model 13 0 12 0 1
92-EP-04 Roplace Mower 05363 6 0 6 0
` 0
92-EP-05 Replace Control Valves 05 Boils 150 0 150 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 244 0 243 0 - 1
92-ESL-0i Street Lighting - Residential 101 0 41 60 0
92-ESL-02 Street Lighting - Arterial 169 159 0 0 0 j
92-ESL-03 Street Lighting - Security L1gh 40 0 40 0 0
I
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT 300 159 81 60 0
92-ED-01 0/H Extensions and Improvement 529 529 0 0 0
92-ED-02 Power Factor Improvements 105 106 0 0 0 J
92-ED-03 Underground Ext. i Improvements 902 902 0 0 0
l 92-ED-04 Transformers 8 Equipment 945 945 0 0 0
92-ED-05 Motor Pool Replacement 225 0 91 92-ED-06 MISCe11eneOUe 70018 & Equipment 14 0 100 0 130
92•ED-07 Right-of-way Easements 55 65 0 0 0
92-ED-08 Economic Feeder Conductor Repl. 205 205 0 0 0
92-ED-09 0/H To Underground Conversions 2,400 2.400 0 0 0 J
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 5,469 69141 191 0 131
92-EM-01 Meters L Associated Equipment ' 119 85 34 0 0
92-EM-02 Replace unit 86309, 05312 8 863 39 0 9 0 30
92-EM-03 Miscellaneous TOOTS 6 Equipment 20 0 20 0 0
92-EM-04 Load Management Program 155 165 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 343 250 63 0 .-30 f
l
II
I
i
Page 14
i
AA..
c
r *r
l
1 p
07-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
04:48 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
x 1000)
92-EC-01 MISC. Tools & Equipment 20 0 20 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC COMMUIII.ATIO 20 0 20 0 0
92-ES-01 MISC. Tools 4 Equipment 30 0 30 0 0
92-ES-02 Replace Unit 05516 14 0 T 0 T
92-ES-03 Transformer Mobilisation 100 100 0 0 0
92-ES-04 Repl Subs Emerg. Interphone Sys is 0 i5 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 159 100 52 0 7
92-EMIS-01 Misc. Off. Equip/Furniture so 0 so 0 0
92-EMIS-02 Motor Pool - 05008 - New VOW cl 30 0 15 0 15
92-EMIS-03 Efficiency Incentive Program 0 0 0 0 0
92-EMIS-04 016 Software 60 0 60 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC ADM. MISC. 160 0 145 0 15
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CID 60695 61660 795 60 190
E
i
i
Page 15
1
t
07-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
04:48 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
(3 % 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUCTI OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 93
93-EP-Oi Construct New Gas Pipeline 1,000 1,000 0 0 0
93-EP-02 Replace Mower $5152 6 0 6 0 0
93-EP-03 Misc. Tools d Equipment 60 0 60 0 0
15 0 15
93-EP-04 misc. Office Equipment
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 1,081 1,000 81 0 0
93-ESL-01 Street Lighting - Residential 107 0 42 65 0
93-ESL-02 Street Lighting - Arterial 68 58 0 0 0
93-ESL-03 Street Lighting - Security L1gh 45 0 45 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT 210 58 87 63 0
93-ED-01 0/H Extensions and Improvement 478 478 0 0 0
93-ED-02 Power factor improvements 110 110 0 0 0
93-ED-03 Underground Ext, 6 Improvements 924 924 0 0 0
93•EO.04 Transformers & Equipment 1,063 863 200 0 0
03-ED-05 Motor Pool Replacement Be 0 30 0 58
93-ED-06 Miscellaneous Tools 8 Equipment 125 0 126 0 0
93-ED-07 Right-of-Way Easements 60 0 60 0 0
93-ED-08 Economic Feeder Conductor Repl, 210 210 0 0 0
93-ED-09 0/H To Underground Conversions 300 0 300 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 31358 21685 115 0 68
~ I
93-EM-01 Meters i Associate* Equipment 120 85 35 0 0
93-EM-02 Replace Unit 05310 6 06311 24 0 5 0 18
93-EM-03 Miscellaneous Tools 6 Equipment 23 0 23 0 0
93-EM-04 load Management Program 173 175 0 0 0
93-EM-05 Data Collection System 125 123 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 467 385 6 0 is
t
I
Page 16
6.
Y
1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
07-:48-89 ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
04:48 PM (S x 1000)
93-EC-01 20 0 0
93-EC-01 Mtsc. Tools i Equipment 20 40 0 40 U 0
93-EC-02 Radio Capicator Ctrl
93-EC-03 Upgrade Sims (Radio) to Smartne 125 199 00 0 0
93-EC-04 Rsloc Sims lRedto) to Syst Mgr 90
0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC COMMUNICATIO 275 215 60
` 93-ES-O1 Misc. tools i Equipment 23 0 23 0 0
1
188 188 0 0 0
f 93-ES-02 Hickory bub AM Retrofit 0 p0 0
93-ES-03 Meter/Sewer Ext. to Airport Sub 20 20 0
93-ES-04 New Substation Site/Teasley 0 2O 700 20 0 0
93-ES-05 Purchase Tractor for Subs.
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 321 218 43 0 0
- O i
j 93-£MIS 01 Misc. Off. Equip/Furniture lure as 0 0 0 85 0 O
` 43-EMIb-02 Efficiency Incentive Program 60 0 60 0
93-EMIS-03 OIS Mork station
135 0 135 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC ADM. MISC.
f 6,847 4,521
f TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 11185 65 76
~l
F I
l
I
Page 17
+
07-Sep-89 1990 - 1944 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
04:48 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
k$ x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN J
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUCTI OTHER ]I
FISCAL YEAR 94
0 0
94-EP-01 misc. t001s a Equipment 65 0 65
16 p 16 0 Q
94-EP-02 Misc. Oftlce Equipment 13 0 12 0 1
94-EP-03 Replace VehiC14 15101
0 1
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 93 0 92
i t
94-ESL-01 Street L19httn9 Residential 113 0 0 0
44 69 0
C'-ESL-02 Street Lighting - Arterial 29 29 60 0 p
94 ESL-03 Street Lt9hZ1n9 - Security Lt9n 60 1
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT - 192 29 94 69 0
' 0
4 94-ED-01 0/H Extensions and improvement 400 400 0 Q 120 120 0 0 0 w
94-ED-02 Power Factor Improvements 1 020 0 0 0
44-ED-03 Underground Ext, a Improvements 11020 0 0 0
94-EO-04 Transformers S Equipment 10080 11080
94•EO-06 Motor Pool Replacement 69 0 13 0 66
6
-ED-06 Miscellaneous Tools i Equipment 130 0 130 0
+
p 0
94 66 0 66 O 0
14-ED-O? Right-of-May Ease+ment&
94-ED-08 Economic Fader Conductor Reps, 216 216 0 p 0
94-ED-09 0/H To Underground Conversions 300 300 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC OISTRIBUTiON - 3,399 31136 206 0 so
4 ~
6 0 i4
94-EM-01 Meters 8 Associated Equipment 120 100 `O p Q
94-EM--02 Motor Pool 30 0 0
44-EM-03 Replace Mtrtst Board 50 60 0 p 0
9/-EM-04 Load Management Program 186 166 0 _
Q 14
SUB-TOTAI ELECTRIC METERING 355 •335 36
i
Page 18
OT-SeD-69 1990 - 199 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
04:48 PM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
x 1000)
94-EC-0i Radio Equip 48.08 MHZ 40 0 40 0 0
20 0 2C 0 0 ~
94-EC-02 Purchase UPS for SCADA
94-EC-03 Replace Vintage Radio Repeaters 60 60 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC COMMUNICATIO 120 60 60 0 0
94-ES-01 Misc. Tools d Equipment 16 0 15 0 0 94 10 10 0 0 0
94-ES-03 water/Sewer Install. NL Sub 0 0
-ES-03 Retrofit Breakers (loc. 8 NL) 260 260 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 2B5 270 15 0 0
94-EMIS-O1 Misc. Off. Equip/Furniture 90 0 90 00 08
94-EMIS-02 Motor Pool - 86 Ford PU 06606 16 0 8 0 D
94-EMIS-03 Efficiency Incentive Program 60 0 60 0 0
94-EMIS-04 016 MAP System
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC ADM. MISC. 166 0 148 0 B
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 C1P 49630 31629 663 69 79 y
GRAND TOTALS 1990 - 1994 CIP 32,852 26,764 5,126 315 644
i i
i
i
i
1
I ~
Page 19
1
1
y
t
OS-Sep-69 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
10;01 AM WATER DEPARTMENT
(3 x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AI0-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 90 II1
90-WA 0450-01 Personal Computer 6 0
a o 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION 6 0 6 0 0
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) OVER ORIGINAL 2 0 2 0 0 '
89-WP 0160-01 Ray Roberts WTP a Raw Water Fac 333 333 0 0 0
6pq-WP Yw; b 33
E9 5/80-05 RaysRobertstkydrocorptPonStockn 1537 1 637 0 0 0
90-WP 0460-01 Mobile Equipment 6 0 3 0 3
90-WP 0460-02 1 MG Elevated Storage 760 750 0 0 0
90-WP 0450-03 P1941ng Raw Water Lines 110 0 110 0 0
90-WP 0460-04 Rehabilitate Walls 400 400 0 0 0
90-WP 0460-05 Now Computer A Pagers 9 0 9 0 0
90-WP 0460-06 Safety Climbing Devices 6 0 6 0 0
90-WP 0460-07 Now Alt Valve a TWU tank 0 0 0 0 0
90-WP 0460-07 tlant L Wells Asroscapin9 6 0 6 0 0 %
90-WP 0460-ob Ottice Furniture 6 0 6 0 0
90-WP 0460-09 New pH Meter L Chlorine Analyzer
System (purchase) 4 0 4 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 3,661 3t6.1 142 0 3
S9-WL-1 Laboratory Expansion Casework 13 13 0 0 0
90-WL 0460-02 Facility Casework
Improvements/Upgrade 1 0 1 0 0
90-WL 0480-03 0ivisioq Intormatlon
Management System (DIMS) 3 0 3 0 0
90-WL 0480-04 Laboratory Equipment 4 0 4 0 0
90-WL 0450-05 Watershed Monitoring Program 5 0 8 0 0
90-WL 0460-06 xoroscaping 1 0 1 0 0
.....a
REVISED SUB-TOTAL WATER LAB 27 13 11 0
t Y~ 90-WEP 0463-01 OIS Information System (50%) 10 10 0 0 0
90-WEP 0463-02 Personal Computer (50%) 4 0 4 0 0
90-WEP 0463.03 Field Equipment 2 0 2 0 0
90-WEP 0463-04 Ofttce Equipment S, Furniture 1 0 1 0 0
90-MEP 0453.06 Mobile Equipment 13 0 13 0 0
90-WEP 0463-06 Storage Building 0 0 0 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL WATER ENOR L PLAN 30 10 20 0 0
I
Page 20
+lJi
`y
08-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVISED
10:01 AM WATER DEPARTMENT
x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 90
89-W-7 Repl. Misc, Waterlines (c) 629 529 0 0 0
9C-WD 0461.01 Oversize Waterlines 150 160 0 0 0
90-WD 0461-02 Mobile Equipment 88 0 9 0 19
90-WD 0451-03 Water, Tops 8 Loops 75 0 0 75 0
90-WD 0451-04 Repl. Fire Hydrant 8 Valves 6 0 5 0 0
90-WO 0451-05 Repl. WL Street Program 176 0 175 0 0
90-WO 0461-06 Rep]. 2" WL with larger size 10 0 10 0 0
^ 90-WD 0451-07 Repl. Misc, Water Lines (d) 10 0 10 0 0
1 90-WD 0451-06 Development Plan Water Lines 250 250 0 0 0
90-WD 0461-09 Misc. Equipment 30 0 30 0 0
90-WD 0461-10 Port, Computer (2 ea. % $6,000) 10 0 10 D 0
REVISED SUBTOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 1,332 929 249 76 T9
90-WM 0462-01 Mobile Equipment ib 0 5 0 5
90-WM 0462-02 Water Motors 76 0 75 0 0
90-WK 0452-03 Misc, Equipment 4 0 4 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL WATER METERINO 95 0 57 0 8
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER C1P 611TT 4,494 518 T6 90
J
i
I '
f
C:\ETC\CIP90\WaWW-SUM,WRI
I
{
r
Page 21
I
T'N -K
O8-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
10:01 AM WATER DEPARTMENT
(3 x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
-
FISCAL YEAR 91
89-WP 0460-01 RayRobef-ts WTP a RawWater FaciI. 1,776 11116 0 0 0
89-WP 0460-02 Finish Mater Transmission Main 681 65 0 0 525
89-WP 0460-03 Booster Station A. System Tie-In 3,235 21046 0 0 1,189
91-WP 0460-01 Mobile Equipment 15 0 15 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 60607 31877 15 0 1,715
91-ML 0480-01 Facility Casework Improvements 3 0 3 0 0
91-WL 000-02 Division Information
Management System (DIMS) 1 0 1 0 0
91-WL 0460-03 laboratory Equipment (AAS) 22 22 0 0 0
91-WL 0480-04 Field Monitoring Equipment 1 0 1
---.---0 0
-
REVISED SUS-TOTAL WATER LAB 27 22 6 0 0
I
i
91-WEP 0463-01 OIS Information System l60%) i0 10 0 0 0
9i-WEP 0453-02 Engineering Software (50%) 2 0 2 0 0
41-WEP 0463-03 Field Equipment 1 0 1 0 0
91-WEP 0163=04 Office Equipment & Furniture 1 O 1 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER ENORAPLAN 14 10 1 0 0
i
90-WO 0461-07 Rep{, Mite. Water Lines (c) 300 300 0 0 0
91-WO 0161-01 Oversize Water Lines (c) 160 150 0 0 0
91-WO 0461-02 Mobile Equipment 139 0 24 0 115
91-WD 0461.03 Water, Taps, Loops 160 0 0 160 0
91-WO 0461.04 Rapt, Fire Hydrant L Valve 66 0 66 0 0
91-WO 0461-05 Repl, Wl Street Program 160 0 150 0 0
91-WO 0461-06 Rapt. 2" WL with larger size 329 0 329 0 0
91-WD 0461-07 Repl. Misc. Water Linea (d) 42 42 0 0 0
91-WD 0161-08 Development Plan Mater lines 250 260 0 0 0
91-WD 0461-09 MISC. Equipment 16 0 15 0 0
-
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER DISTRIB 1,621 112 681 ISO Lib
91-WM 0462-O2 Water Meters 114 0 114 0 0
91-0 0462-03 MISC. Equipment 3 0 3 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER METERING 117 0 111 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER CIP 70385 41651 726 180 11630
Page 22
V
08-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
10:01 AM WATER DEPARTMENT
i
(6x 1000)
-
PROJECT
ND CURRENT D-IN
NUMBER PROJECT-DESCRIPTION- TOTAL FUN
D RFVENUE
ACONSFR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 92
89-WP 0460-01 RayRoberts WTP i RAWWeter Facll. 61174 61174
89-WP 0460-02 Finished Water Transmission Main 20092 1 0 0 0
92-WP 0460-01 MOb11e Equipment 1669 0 0 623
14 0 3 0 11
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER PRODUCTION -
1,880 11343 3 0 - 634
i
92-WL D480-02 Division Informationprowments 7 0 T 0 0
Management System (DIMS) 3 0 '
I 92-WL 0480-03 Laboratory Equipment (GC/MS) 22 22 0 0 0
92-WL 0460-04 Reservoir Monitoring Program 14 0 0
_ _ _ .
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER LAB - - - ' O ,4 D
46 22 24 0 0
92-WEP 0463-02 Field Equipment System (608) 0 1 10 0 0 0
92-WEP 0463-03 Office Equipment 8, Furniture 1 0,
1 0 1 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER ENORBPLAN
12 1p 2 0 0
91-WD 0461-01 Re 1. Misc. Water 92-WO 0461.01 Oversize Waterlineslnu (c) 238 236 0 0
92-WO 0461-02 Mobile Equipment 200 200 0 0 0
92-WD 0461.03 Water, Tsps, Loops 120 0 30 0 90
92-WD 0461-04 Repl, Fire Hydrant A Valve 110 0 70 186 0
92-WO 0461-06 Ropl. WL Street Program 160 0 0
92-WD 0461-06 Repl, 2" WL with larger eite 340 0 160
92-WO 0461-07 Repl. Misc. Water Lines (d) 42 42 340 0 0
92-WD 0461-06 Development Plan Water Lines 0 0 0
92-WD 0461-09 Misc. Equipment 260 260 0
92-WO 0461.10 E. McKinney WL L288 to Mayhill 120 0 16 0 0
_ _ 1.. 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER DISTRIBUTION • -
~ 1,73J 860 606 •.-.166 90
92-WM 0462-01 Mobile Equipment
92-WM 0462-02 Water Meters 16 0 4 0 11
120
92-WM 0462-03 Misc. Equlpment 3 0 123 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER METERING - 136 - 0
0 121 0 11
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER CIP TOTAL 91809 81226 161 188 636
Page 23
i
I 08-Sep-89 1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
10;01 AM WATER DEPARTMENT
(i x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER J
it
FISCAL YEAR 93
i
80-WP 0450-01 RayRobarts WTP a RawWater Facil, 30220 444 0 0 21776
89-WP 0450-02 Finished Water Transmission Main 30138 21354 0 0 785
L 93-WP 0460-01 Mobile Equipment 35 0 4 0 31
r 93-WP 0460-02 Booster Pumps-New Pressure Plane 600 ---500 0 0 __---0
REVISED
SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER CIP TOTAL $1693 3 298 4 0 31592
f / 93-WL 0460-01 Facility Improvements 3 0 3 0 0
93-WL 0450-02 Laboratory Equipment 20 19 1 0 0
93-WL 0480-03 Division Information
Mrnagement System 1 0 1 0 0
93-WL 0480-04 WAtershed Monitoring Program -.----12 0 12 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER CIP TOTAL 36 i9 11 0 0
- -
f I
` 93-WEP 0483-01 OIS Information System (60x) 10 10 0 0 0
93-WEP 0463-02 Field Equipment 1 0 1 0 0
93-WEP 0463-03 Office Equipment S Furniture _.-----1 0 1 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER CIP TOTAL 12 10 Z 0 0
i I
92-WO 0461-OT Repl. Misc. Waterlines (c) 303 128 176 0 0
93-WD 04611-01 Overaits Waterlines 200 200 0 0 0
93-WO 0461-02 Mobile Equipment 65 0 68 0 0
93-WD 0451-03 Water, Taps, Loops 192 0 0 192 0
93-WD 0461-04 Repl. Fire Hydrant 8 Valve 74 0 74 0 0
93-WD 0481-05 Repl. WL Street Program 150 0 150 0 0
93-WD 0461-05 Repl. 2" WL with larger site 160 0 150 0 0
93-WD 0461-07 Rep1, Misc. Water Lines to) 56 56 0 0 0
93-00 0461-08 Development Plan Water Linea 260 250 0 0 0
93-WO 0461.09 Misc. Equipment 16 0 15 0 0
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER CIP TOTAL 10468 534 632 192 0
I 93-WM 0462-01 Mobile Equipment 16 0 16 0 0
i 93-WM 0462-02 Water Meters 126 0 126 0 0
93-WM 0482-03 Misc, Equipment 3 0 3 0 0
SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER NP TOTAL 145 0 145 0 0
i
REVISED SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER CIP TOTAL 61644 3,961 800 192 31692
Page 24
..ems
1990 - 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
001 69 WATER DEPARTMENT
10:01 AM
10: r
{S x 10001
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AIO-IN I
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 94
16 0 3 _0 13
94-WP 0160-01 Mobile Equipment
94-WP 0460-02 1MG Elevated Storage-New Plane 750 ---760 •.---_0 0 -----0
SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER PRODUCTION -T66 760 3 0 13
1 94-WL 0480-01 facility Improvements 22 19 3 0 0
94-WL 0450-02 Lrboratory Equipment 3 1 3 0 0
94-WL 0450-03 Division InfomAtiOn 1 0 1 0 0
Management System 12 0 12 0 0
94-WI 0480-04 Watlrahed Monttdrtng program
SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER LAB 3E 19 19 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ~
94-WEP 0463-01 Field Equipment 1 0 1 0 0
94-WEP 0463-02 Oftice Equipment i Furniture 1 0 1 0 0
94-WEP 0463-03 Mobil! Equipment (50%) 9 4 ---•-.-0 6
O 4
SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER ENGR&PLAN 11 0 6 0 6
j 1
93-WO 0451.07 Repl, Misc. Waterlines (c) 409 204 206 0 0
94-WD 0461.01 Oversite Waterlines 200 200 0 0 0 ,
94-WD 0461-02 Mobile Equipment 60 0 60 0 0
94-WD 0461-03 Water, Taps, Loops 200 0 0 200 0
94-WD 0461-04 Rspl, Fire Hydrant A Valve 76 0 76 0 0
94-WO 0461-06 Repl, WL Street Program 150 0 160 0 0
94-WD 0461-06 Rspl. 2" WL with larger site 160 0 160 0 0
94-WO 0461.07 Repl, Misc. Water Lints (d) 49 49 0 0 0
94-WD 0461-05 Development Plan Water Lines 250 250 0 0 0
94-WD 0461.09 Misc. Equipment 15 0 16 0 0
SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER DISTRIBUTION -1,569 703 656 200 0
94-WM 0462-01 Mobile Equipment 16 0 16 0 0
94-WM 0462-02 Water Meters 133 0 133 0 00
94-WM 0462-03 Misc, Equipment 16 .---.0 16 ---0
.0
SUB-TOTAL 1990 WATER METERING 164 0 164 0
T01AL 1994 CIP 29638 11472 646 200 16
I GRAND TOTAL 1990 - 1994 CIP 33,454 22,603 31652 835 60164
i
Page 25
5
S V
01•S4D-11
01:11 AM 1110 1111 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
(1 K 1000)
PROJECT IOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMNIA PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTP oTNIR
FISCAL YEAR 10
10-WWA 0411.0( ►arwnal Caputor, Office Furniture 1 0 { 0 0
REVISED SUBTOTAL WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION / 0 1 0 0
fl~ II-WW-4 New air almr (South PhAt) 201 too 0 0 0
10-SAO 0110-01 100 Mha 04010 (1 MTA odnvert-a-am) It 13 0 0 0
SO•Wo0 0470-03 Mobile Iauipw+t, all A Truck 1 0th 112 0 121 0 Si
10-IRO 0110.02 Inravstivo A AltornetlY4 TOW0100Y 21 21 0 0 0
10-MO 0110.04 Lift Station Rw4wNtIOM mm,) 40 10 0 0 0
10-WW1 0410-01 EAR plant 1464" Owaterirg (1 bode) 100 100 0 0 0
10-VO 0470.01 AddI&JONl PorsdnN Computers to 0 20 0 0
10-" 0110.07 Lan4 Purchase and D0v*I*P nt too 100 0 0 0
!o-WW1 0470-01 Aeration Sinn Monitor., PNw Motors
Sled" uYel Indicator. 20 to 0 0 0
10•WW► 0110-01 Lift Stntidn SCADA (4 00.) 1 0 1 0 0
10-WWp 0410-10 ReroecaDlnl to 0 10 0 O
REVISED SUB-TOTAL WAITIWATIR FRODUCTION 11S lOS Ili 0 SS
13-WWL-1 Laboratory, f%Wslen teaworit 21 !1 0 0 0
10-wn 0411.02 Facility Casework
loorovosenta/UPgrsdo E 0 f 0 0
10-WL 0411-01 01wisidn Infdrsati0n
Mw"-pt Iyetoe (DINS{ 1 0 1 0 0
10-IML 0411.04 laWatery IsuiP WI i1 0 it 0 0
60-Mgt 0411.01 Inluotrlal Waste Program 0 0 0 0 0
10-WWI. 0411-01 Mobile Ia6iPW% ! 0 1 0 0
10-MR 0411.01 Split Prwentlon Program I 0 a 0 0
10-WI. 0111.07 Laboratory E.car410n (leroeWlnp 1 0 1 0 0
AMIN IUI•TOTAL WASTEWATER LABORATORY 11 11 It 0 0
1o-1ME► 0412.04 416 Infdrsatlen system (lot) 10 10 0 0 0
{1 f0-WWtp 0472.01 Personal Computer (1011 1 0 4 0 0
f 10-WJP 0472-01 Flw Mdasurlnt 00VIa1 1 1 0 0 0
ID-WWI► 0471-04 Field (Quip 6ml 1 0 1 0 0
00-NWIP 041Y-01 Molls IOa1"ont 0 0 0 0 0
10-NWIF 0471.01 0"160~t printer 1 0 E 0 0
10•WWIP 0411-07 Office Idwipwt A Furniture 1 0 1 0 0
REVISED WI-TOTAL WASTEWATER 1000 1 PLAN !1 11 11 0 0
Page 26
Y 5. .
l
e
6
OT•6ep•I/ I HO 1b4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVI60
80,13 PM WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
............000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AIO-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVINUE CONSTA OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 10
41.3.7 Repl, M1ee. Sewer Line (c) IT? 377 0 0 0
10-MAC 0471.01 Oversize Sewerllnee 110 160 0 0 0
NO.W4 017101 Mobile E4U1pe0mt 116 0 It 0 134
r 10-N110 0471-03 Sewer TAp1 (10) t0 0 0 10 0
10-WWr 0471-04 Ibpl. IL Street Proor4e 100 100 0 0 0
10-wN0 0111.01 Inflow Inflltretteo CorrectiOM 411 431 0 0 0
10-1M0 0411-01 Repl, Mime lower Lime (d) 60 10 0 0 0
Io-MAC 0111.01 Develop it plan Sewrllnee 360 160 0 0 0
SO-WK 0411-01 M1ee, tRulpwt 11 0 to 0 0
10-HNC 0411-01 Repl, 14• Sower 0136" (woodrow) (c) NS 141 110 0 0
ACV1110 SUS-TOTAL NASTEMATIR COLLECTION •-•1,513 1,111 111 10 131
li REVISED TOTAL 1110 CIP 30717 1,114 414 10 t1S
1 I
~ r
I~
0 %1TC1CtP•/0\1M•pUM.Mll
i
i
i
I
Page 27
Dl•Iep•u
1011 PM 1110 - 1111 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - REVISED
WASTHMATHR DEPARTMENT
.....(f.x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMSEA PROJECT DEICR2PTI9N TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTA OT141R
FISCAL VEAA 11 l
SA•W-6 [quallsatlon Saaln (Desigm) ISO ISO o 0 0
11-WP 0110-01 WT Plant Expansion (Design) too too 0 0 0
I1-WP 0110-02 Mobile equipment 17 0 11 0 22
SI-WWP 0470-01 Innovative 1 Alternative Tocmvioly 21 t1 0 0 0
I1-WP 0470-04 lend Purchase and Development so 10 0 0 O
11-WT 0470-01 Dechlorinatlon System 200 200 0 0 0
11-W► 0110-01 Additional Personal CoaMer / 0 e O 0
H•WWP 0110-07 Lift station Renovation (t so.) 42 42 0 0 0
I1-WIP 0110-04 Lift station SCMA (4 N,) 1 0 S 0 0
4 PIVIS[D IUi-TOTAL WASTEWATER PAOOVOTION 712 111 11 0 2S
SI-WK 0111.01 PaN11ty Camework
Ieprovemmnte/Upgrade S 0 1 0 0
11-WML 0491.01 Division Information
Management. system (DEW) 1 0 t 0 0
l1-WL 0411.02 Laboratory equipment CARS) if 11 0 0 0
$I-WL 0441-04 Field s4nitorlnl Equipment 1 0 2 0 O
11-WL 0111-01 Industrial Waste "ram 11 0 U 0 0
11.WL 0411.04 Mobile Equipment 1 0 1 C G
REVISED BUI-TOTAL WASTEWATER LABORATORY N 11 IS 0 0
E
It-WWEP 0111-01 021 2nformetim system (101) 10 10 0 0 0
,
It-WHIM 0471-01 field equipment 1 0 2 0 0
11-WWeP 0112-02 OfFles Equlpment A Puenlture 1 0 1 0 0
11-WEP 0111.01 Mrviee/sackup Camera Unit 7 7 0 0 0 IJ
REVISED SUI-TOTAL WASTEWATER 1404 1 PLAN 11 IF 4 0 0
l0-WC 0111.01 Reel, Mine. Serer Line (s) /Q 21114, 112 0 0
11-WC 0411-01 Oversiso bnrliMs 200 too 0 0 0
I1-we 0471.01 Mobile equipment 41 0 is 0 7
I1-WWC 0471-02 Sewer tape 1601 so a 0 so 0
I1-WWC 0411-04 pool, IL w'"t Program 100 0 100 0 0
11-WO 0111.06 Inflow Infiltration Correction goo silo 0 0 0
I1-WC 0111.01 Aepi, Mile Sewer time (d) s0 0 40 0 0
11-WWC 0171.01 Development Plan sewerliMs ISO I60 0 0 0
11-WC 0171.04 mile, Equipment IS 0 11 0 0
RIVISIO W1-TOTAL WASTEWATIR COLLIOT20N 1,471 1,200 122 11 7
R[VIS10 TOTAL 1111 CIP 21111 10014 Its 11 BO
Page 2A
Ih
a
7 ,
I
o7•B.v/5
10:02 PM ' 1150 - 1111 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
WASTEWATER Of►ARTMENT
(e x 100°)
BOND CL01.41NT AIO-IN ,
PROJECT TOTAL FUND PEVENUE CONSTRUCTI OTHER
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION
F IICAL Yf AR 12
0
0 0 0
1l-WW-2 Eawll:atlon Basin (Cenetructlon) 1.000 1.000 0 0
111 1//
I1-W+P 0470-01 MIT Plant fxpanelon (DesiIn) 300 300 0 0 0
52-MIP 0470-01 1PRT Plant Expen, (Construction) 01 0 0 t1
I2.WP, 0470-02 WNT Plant IXW- (IMSPectlon) 101 11 0 16
/2-WIP 0170-03 Mobile Equipment is 11 is s0 0 ° °
I2-WWP 0470-04 Land PUrOnaee And DavelOpeent a0 60 0 0 0
22-WW 0110-03 Innovative 6 Alternative TechnoloSY \ o 6 0 0
12-Wf) 0470-06 Lift Station SOADA N ea•) 41 11 0 0
12-Weep 0170-07 Loft ttstton Removatlon ea.l
t\
SUS-TOTAL WASTEWATER PROOUCTION 1,H \ -1,673 27 0
3 ~
i
3 25 0 0
I 21 0
02-6ML 04it-01 ►at111tY Iaprovenanb 3 0 1 0 0
/2.WWL 0411-02 1, 00f60" Equlpment
12-MIL 0161-03 tawratory Iiulpeent MC/IIS) 84 61 0 0 0
....e/ so
SUI-TOTAL WASTEWATER LABORATORY
I
10 10 0 0 0
12-WWIP 0472-01 016 Infrxmetlon SYStea U06) 1 0 1 0 0
13-MQP 0472-02 Field Equipment 1 0 1 0
12-W tp 0172-03 office Equipment \ Furniture
t0
I I D o
MA.161AL WASTEWATER IN A 6 PLAN
i
2/6 0 251 0 0
51-WWC 0111-0\ Kepi. M10c. fever line (c) fi 300 p 0 p
12-WIC 0111-o1 Oversize SereMAGS 43 0 1 0 31
tl-WMc 0171.02 Mo011e Equlpeeot 36 0 0 I1 0
12-WIC 0111-03 fewer Taps (50) 100 p 100 0 0
12-WIG 0471-04 Rool. IL Street ProffAa Soo 500 _ 0 0 0
11-WO 0471-07 Inftw tnfiltretlon Correction 46 41 0 0 0
/2•WnC 0411.04 Repl. M1ec Bever L1n66 (d) 260 250 0 0
12.1M0 0471-07 DevelOPW t Plan 6ewr11nes 1S 0 1! 0 0
12-wC 0111-08 W181. Equipment _
•-•1,161 -II/ ISO is 34
IW•TOTAL WASTEWATIA COLLECTION
3,430 2.045 141 31 60
t01A1 1112 021
1
Page 29
T-N
a
07-SeD-/!
10:02 PM
1110 - 1904 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
(S x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL fLMD REVENUE CONSTRUCTS OTHER
•
FIICAL YlAR 13
81-WP 0470-01 IIWT Plant E►paaeion (Design) 52 52 0 0 0
12-MIA 0470-01 WT Plant LKpanelon (Construction) 21500 21500 0 0 0
92-WWP 0470-02 WWT Plant ExWeidn (Inspection) 101 101 0 0 0
13-WWP 0470-01 Mobile Equipment 47 0 22 0 29
93-WWP 0110.02 Additional Personal Computer 10 0 10 ' 0 0
tl-NIA 0470-03 1" sting lift 33%10n Renevatl0n (2 46 48 0 0 0
13-WWP 0470-04 inn0VAtiv4 A Alternative TeCMOlogy 30 30 0 0 0
13-IMP 0470-05 Land Purchase end Development so SO 0 0 0 ;
93-WO 0470-08 Lift Station SCADA (4 ma.) 8 0 S 0 0
I
BUB-TOTAL WASTEWATER PRODUCTION 2,844 21779 40 0 25
i
I
13-WL 0481-01 Facility Improvements 8 0 / 0 p
IS-WWL 0461-03 LaBerstory Equipment (MCP) s0 17 3 0 0
13-WL 0481.03 Division Informstim
NanaSwnt system (DING) 3 0 3 0 0
( /A-WWL 0481.04 Industrial Meets Program 24 0 24 0 0
SLIM-TOTAL WASTEWATER LABORATORY !S 11 is 0 0
I
i
13•WRP 0472-01 pas Information System (90s) 10 10 0 0 0
17-WEP 0472-02 Held Equipment 1 0 1 0 0
13-MEP 0472.03 Office Equlppnt A Purniturs 1 0 1 0 O I
SUB-TOTAL WASTEWATER lNOR A PLAN i2 10 2 0 p
f2-W4 0471.08 1e01. 11410C. Sewer Line (c) 1!8 213 145 0 0
13-WWC 0471-01 Oversize so"rllmse 200 200 0 0 0
13-WWC 0471-02 Mobile Equipment 214 0 134 0 so
IS-WWC 0471-03 Sewer Taps (SO) 38 0 0 H 0 J
13-WC 0411-04 11e01, 5L Street Program 100 O 100 0 0
IJ-WC 0471.01 Inflow Infiltration Correction ISO ISO 0 0 0
13-WPC 0471.06 I601, M190 Sewer Lines (d) 48 41 0 0 0
63-WC 0471.07 Development Flan sewsrtinee ISO 250 0 0 0
83-WC 0411-06 Mite. Equipment 1! 0 1! 0 0
IUI-TOTAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION 1,111 1,301 8f4 68 80
TOTAL 1113 elf 40742 41147 474 S8 105
h
Page 30
s 4 +
A
OT-leD-1!
10:02 PM
11#0 - 11#6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
11 x 1000)
PROJECT SOHO CURRENT AID-IN
NUMW PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUCTI OTHER
f26GAL YEAR 96
92-TEMP 0670-0t WY Plant Expansion (Construction) 21000 2,000 0 0 0
12-TRIP 0670-02 WWT Plant Expansion (Inspsctlon) 171 111 0 0 0
04-WP 0670-01 Mobile Equlpmmnt 50 0 11 0 15 ~
16-WWP 0670-02 Existing Lift Station Renovation (2 49 11 0 0 0
16-WfR 0670-01 land Purchase and 0evels,eent 50 SO 0 0 0
14-WP 0170-06 Innovative l Alternative Technology 10 10 0 0 0
14-WP 0170-05 lift station Re-activation (CO-ed) 220 I20 0 0 0
11-NIP 0170-06 lift Station SCADA a 0 a 0 0
SUN-TOTAL WASTEWATER PRODUCTION 21!67 21501 21 O as
116-WWL 0611-01 fee111ty Improvement 61 07 a 0 0
16-WWL 0491-02 Laboratory Equipment 1 0 1 0 O
k N-MIL 0491.02 Division Information W
Wulesemset Iyetsm (DINS) 1 0 1 0 0
F 16-M L 0111-06 industrial Waste Program 16 0 11 0 0 I
SUS-TOTAL WANYVATER LAIORATORY f0 17 11 0 0
14-WEP 0472-01 field Equipment 1 0 1 0 0
06-WEEP 0172-02 Office Epulpoent 9 furniture 1 0 1 0 0
16-TRIP 0672-01 Mobile Equipment (s*%) I 0 6 0 5
#611-TOTAL WASTEWATER ENOR A PLAN 11 0 6 0 1
L_
13-MC 0671.01 Reel. Mee. serer time Ic) •116 249 211 0 0
11-W4 0611.01 Oversla• sererl7nes 200 too 0 0 0
16-WIC 0471.02 Mobile equipment 70 0 60 0 so
0
16-W4 0171-01 Serer Taps (60) 11 0 0 to
f1-WWC 0171.04 Rcpt. IL street Program 100 0 - 100 0 0
16-WWC 0171.05 Inflow Infiltration Correction 150 650 0 0 0
11-WIC WS-64 Awpi. Wee sewer Lime (d) 66 66 0 0 0
16-WWO 061%-OT Develop- t Plan Sewerlinee 250 I10 0 0 0
14-WWC 0171-01 misc. Equipment Is 0 1s 0 0
IUs-TOTAL WAITEVATIR COLLECTION 1,717 11211 621 s1 20
TOTAL 1116 020 61651 11160 691 is 70
GRAND TOTAL 1110 - 1116 CIP 11,010 1s11s0 2,150 151 616
Page 31
I {
A > .
(yda, r.
y
w
V
f
1
,
GENERAL GOVE9NMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCNEDULI RIVISLD:
1994-95 Septeaber 21, 1969
P102ECT 1LNDING SOURCE
i SOLD 1960 1UTURR BONDS :
BONDS BOND ; OR CO'S OTHER ; TOTAL , REMARKS
STREETS
I ,
University Drive, IV.$. 380), 1-35
i
! to I'.s. 377480, Widen to 6 lanes.
right-ofway, signals and $aT5,OD0 1300,000 144.2]0,]76 645,405,310 1995 Bond Sale.
landscaping. 7910 Bond Election. 1
SidevslRs 1100,000 1100,000 1993 Bond Election
Arterial turn Lanes s95,0o0 $05.000 1993 Bond Election
j Nasch Branch, U.S. 360 to
11 Crystal, Plug 1 $573,125 1573,125 1113 Bond Election
CATEGO" TOTAL $67,,000 $300,000 $764,125 141,230 376 64G,17),:01
~
3 J
1 '
A16rogT
1,000' laraa41 Taxiway Extension
Bolding P.pron $15,600 11421200 1156,000 901 ►AA Crsat, 1193 Bond Election
stub ttxiway to soutAwaat
Indussrlal it" $61000 $54,000 $60,000 904 1AA Grant, 1113 Bond Election
j North Rolling Apron $5,740 $5I,6G0 $07,400 90% fM Grant, L913 bond Election
1,000' Runway Extension 123,4&0 1211,140 $234,600 903 fAA Grant, 1197 Bond Election
MIIL sunwy Extension Lighting 11,400 112,600 $14,000 901 fAS Grant, 1693 pond glection
Engineering and Contingency 1136,000 $1,224,000 17,760,000 got rAA Grant, 1993 Bond Election
i
goad Access to South Hangar Aria 1100,000 1100,000 1193 Bond Electlon
Page 32
1
l
I
s
6tNElAL GOVBRNNINT
CAPITAL INPROVII!INT SCHEDULE REVISED:
1994-94
September 21, 1199
PR011CT nutNG sovecs
i SOLD 1996 Must NOND9
i BONDS
i ND Ol CO'i , OTHgE I TOTAL MARKS
AIRPORT (continued)
Overlay Runway
621'395 9192,545 1213,950 901 FAA Grant, 1993 NOW Election
Infield Drainage
171,243 9611,187
$712,130 901 FAA Grant, 1993 bond Election
Land Acquisition of
I Close loner 1701,135 62,712 114
13,014,350 901 FAA Grant, 1113 Bond Election
CATtCObT TOTAL .
6091,473 95,2/2,257 $5,924,730
I
i
V PARES AND RUINATION
} North Was Development,
PhaAa 1
i
91,000,000 ,
9400,000 $1,500,000 1993 .ond Blectlon, State Retch.
civic center pool 11,000,000 11,000,000 1993 fond Blection
CATECOtT TOTAL •
92,000,000 1400,000 52,600,000
TOTAL 1674.000 1300,000 $3,450,691 91/,972,633 141,599,231'
TOTAL C1P DEBT ISSUANCE
93.750,599
Pool ptolecta listed based on present conditions and Information . continuing negotiations with school
district And future planning will provide bests for final recommendations and decision& regarding beet way
to ailoata 9119 million to matt community swimming needs.
Page 33
IF low
4
l
v
'A'rulr .,f
r'M11ttr 141 VIII r''ri Sl :r IIr7l if
lA~15 7f. Irl1 f!:1 U:
i rVn,tl:rT Anru.r i. L'rN'r ,
FVNDINC SOl'Rft
MSfIr1:D lot FWUBr BONDS _
St CfI IS s0 nB rO'S 1 OTRCB
TOM.
! .1C.NARKS
Loop 288 Spurr Spencer Ic IN 15
tt,roD,ooo
PAAAS too, ON 1903 Bond rlection
State Parllcipatlon needed,
i
Nel+Ihborhood Perk Derrlopaent
$300,900
PUBLIC SAfrTT N00,0p0 1993 Bond Election
I
Outdoor faer/enef Siren ,
f1rNh,1lre r'nanurer g53,iS0
$253,730 1993 Bond illecllon
Alr/rylrhl rehlrl. 11,5011,900
$1,500,000 1997 Bond election V
i rAT"T Tt1TAl, $250,000 1250,/pp i
L 1993 BnnA Ikrf inn
' 12,003,710
$2,001,750
TMAL l
i 111TAL rip fw" 1SSPANrR 51,403,750
11,101,150
$3,401,150
I
I'
` Page 34
r
I '
1
,
'a
P.I.N YI AI. ~A!1'F RNNf !+T
fAPITAL IRPINow NT vvrM'I,F.. pf VISEO:
I!1!Iti 'li AueU,at 7, IWO
1'iMffrt PUMPING ,SAXWE
' SrN,D 1916 i
f1JtUllE "DS I 1
MMtU
POND l OR CO SOTNER T<ITAL
R.....9
STpffT3
RasrA pranrA, PAaae 11 11,5011,0011 {1,500,000 1793 Election
Slennla
1100,000 1100,000 1997 Election {
PATI(XWY Tttt Al
1111.600.000 11,600.000 I
{
PAIRS AND IrmEATION
Land ArnNlallloa fnr
COMunltf Park 11500.000
1600,000 1993 Election
1.1 DIARY
Rain LIhrar► Renorelion 1150,000
I
1993 Election
110.000
PURLIP RArM.
Elr• station 61 Iehalllllallon 1509,000 1900,000 1993 Election
1
TOTAL
12,150.000 12,650.000
TOTAL CIP Dr" ISWAM'E
12,/50,000
i
r
Page 35
{
a.r
s
+'APITAI.'INft'knYf)lcNT44AlIniLN
1'n,T 'rN
flpufrT REYISM
_ f7 rNlif Nq !xn'Nrf
19RN
BIMYI~S f fVlUR, MNIkS Anna STNiL79 '
' OTI(FII
' - N IXONS
Landseapine Enlranrr,Va
~~"-1 Narhfll Rnb, Pharr I 1150.000 lIf0,000
1300,000 1997 bob Election, stale aatcA.
f A7fYxpT 1YITA1, 1500,000
_ . - "00,000 1993 Bo
• nd Election
1650.000 SIS0.000 8600.000
PARKS ANA RfPRNA7IAN
P190 Pnnlf
tsoo.aw i
1500,000 1993 Election. Needs
PUBLIC SAFm 01111 participation. j
►lrtr Station ft Reconstruction I
Srrnnd Aerial Ileric► $750,000
/1111,000 1993 Rood Nleelios
CATI.COR! TOTAL 1100,000 '
$500,000 P993 Rost! Election
11,250,wo
i $1,250,000
i
' TOTAL - ]
TOTAL CIP of" IWAVE 12,100.000 SI53,000 !I
tPonl PrOJPCtl
and 1lslyd bAnrd on prep►al conditions and IAloraatloa 12,100,000
4t ocN aal~ 11,5pN
contlnulnN negotiations rllh school
r lllui loll prorlde haala for f1ns1 rrroanendetlona and drelaiona
neet consunltE ay anlnN need.. refnrdla
N beat
I
Page 36
I~
I -IV low
R JIYL.M
Mrl: M+1
V
i
CAN[AAL C05'p MtaNT
CAPI TAI IKP9OVLttNT SCM[DUi!
j~ : 1998-99 knis 0:
oar 11. 7989
rao3:et
PUNDINC SOUACt
i SOLO 19SG
I+
AND
1 So , M UIR SONDS
OR CO'9 1
k
O7MCa ALt1Aat3 TOTAL
STRAITS
afdrralts ar5d tltways '
uo/,ooa
` Atraat Construct ionlascoastructfon 9100,000 1293 low alaction
92;0,000
alptals 12;0,000 1093 fond alattfon
Artarlsls Turn Lanss 9200,000
12+0,000 1993 Bona 9loctlon
14" 2A1 1100,000
South a-0-ti 9100,000 1913 land alactloa
! !1,800,000
MAyAfll Road, PAsas 11 91,800,000 1193 fond tlsCtfon
j 1+00,000
CAfAOOAT TOTAL - S M),000 1993 toad alsctlon
13,000,000
1.1,000,000
DAA1NACa
PaCan Crssi Drafnaes
r, /'+00,000
5.00,000 1993 lord alsctlon
C TOTAL
17 „00,000
TOTAL CIO DnT 1a804lIC! $3,000,000
i
i N,sao,aoo
Page 37
F'
CITY OF DENTON
PIYL YLAA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAY
(NON-UTILITY)
1988-89
PROJECT tSTDOrED COST BOY YMED STATUS*
Streets and Transportation
Teasley Lane (PM 2181)1 Your lade 1 230,000 1986 Bond Issue (1986 Sold) Laodeemploti
divided I-35 to 2 elite mouth) (1986 Sold) 1130,000, 1990-91.
Sell (20,000, low
and driveways,
Davis Street paving taprovemeutt M. 000 I986 Bond Issue (1986 Sold)
(Emile Drive to 1969-90.
Avenue L ve toior-e7S) 60,000 1986 Bond lieu. (1986 Sold)
Brodie Bus Rebuild 701,557
(4 lanes Windsor to 1983 Street Impcoveaeat Goad
University Drive)
Boodle Brae Rebuild 899,980 1983 Street Improvement Bond J
(4 Idles University Drive e
to Scripture)
Audra Lane Rebuild 61,244 1985 Street Improvement Bond
(End of divide to paisley)
Acme Street Rebuild 61,302 1983 Street Improvement load
(Bernard to port Worth Drive)
tacult Street Rebuild 682,095
(Congress to University) 1983 Street improvement Bond
Drslute
Update Master Drainage Plan 1 415,000 1986 Bond Issue
Parks and lecrestioa
Recreation Center $1,300,000 1986 Bond Issue 1491-92
Athletic field Development 250,000 1966 goad Issw
i
Fire Stations and Equipment
I
2 New Fire Suttons
fire EQul peaat 11,000,000 1986 and 1981 30 04 issue
200,ODO 1988 Bond Issue
Li/rte EXPamelon, fkado 1 1 360,000 1986 good lotus
i
I Plasm for LAW tatorcewnt Center/ 1 200 ,ODO 1986 land Issue To 1990-91, and
ors rt Cop a:
Space study
TOTAL 16,L01,162
i
13bowa rbets m project that was part of the CIP considered In 1988, mod has been moved in the CIP
eodeidtred to Notaeber 1969.
1057k/
Page 38
4
i
i
i
T a 4r --W
CITY OF DE.NTON
PIPE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROYENP.NT PLAN
(NON-UTILITY)
1989-90
PROJECT HSTIMA'r1D COST HOW PUNDBD STATUS
Streets sod Trassportstios
Loop 286/Local Participation 12,2u0,006 1986 Brad Issue Lasdsespiep
(4 Tans divided from 113,000, 1993-'94
U.S. 180 to Colorado Blvd.)
U.S. 380/Local Participation 600,000 1986 Dosd Issue I-35 to Ma loco
(six lane divided from laodacapisg,
U.S. 71 (Locust) to $120,700, 1989-90
Loop 288)
Nottinshas Extension 500,000 1965 Bond Issue 1470,000, 1990-91
(U.S. 380 to Mingo load)
U.S. 380 Rlaht-of-Way 250,000 1986 goad issue 1994-95
Acquisition
loasle Brae Rebuild 347,876 1985 Street Improvement L"°q-B9
(Riney Road to Wladeor) load
Scripture Rebuild 347,907 1983 Street Improvement 1999-90
(1-35 to Donnie Brae) Bond
W. Colt Rebuild 207,376 1985 Street improvement 1989-90
l (I-35 to near Bonnie grit) Bond
Avenue A Rebuild 210,028 1985 Street Isproveseat 1988-89
.I (Ntghland to Mc Ccralck) Bond
Him Street Rebuild 314,515 1985 Street Improvement 1988-89
(Highland to Eagle) Bond
i
Dr m InaAa
Laws Del Ray OralnsAe 1 625,000 1985 band Issue 1992-93, with 288
StuartrSunnydale Drsinage 350,00 1956 Boas Issue 1989-90 i
Holly Hill Area Drataage 300,000 1986 Barad Issue 1989-90
I
IAN Enforcement Ceaterl 1 500,000 1966 sold Issue 12,000,000,
ouzt 7 em, arse 2 to 1991-92
I '
i
TOTAL 16,753,203
i
3 (
I
i
1
j 1D53kr
r
h
Page 39
k
1
a
1
V
I
a
CITT OF DEMTOM
PIVS MR. CAPITA 1[T OVLMEMt PLAN
T1
1990-91
MAMA
_
LSS IIUTID COST NOMC_ OW MAMA
PLO39Ct
Sttaets sad crane oetatlon 557,000, 1989-90,
fas t Worth Drive (U.S. 711) 11,063,000 1966 load Lague L-35 N. to Colltaa 1
Phase 2, 1991-92
4 La as 41v lded from 1.35 Phase 1, 1991-97
to TM 1830 1992-97
1111000 1986 Goad lasua
Oriole street Recoostructt+e
Dra Laa s 19)0-91
1 gp,pOp 1986 bond loos
loge Worth D[LVe Nasal 8c, J
i
i- Park$ Rod Leccutto 1997-94 as South eA
Recces tion cotter {1,400,000 1986 goad Ialus RsgroatSon Canter
1986 goad lolue 1990-91 '
j 450,000
' Atnlat lc held 9ev •lopsent
1492-93 a 9,
( 600,00 1986 bond Issue Llbrarl
Ltbrar t: sl°°
osD st oe
(400,000 Ln
LnlortaNat Csn tat {L %O,DOO 966 goad Isue 1992.93
Ur et Lon
oust os at a I
TOTAL 15,621,000
!I V
i fl
1037k1 J
Page 40
I
1
1
IV low
'I .
r
f LVL YLAA CAP1rAL 1MPxov ENENT PLAY
(NON-UTILITY)
1991-92
PIOJLCT ESTINAILD COST Now FUND RD STATUS
Streets "4 Transportatloe
Match branch load/Mass 1 S 373,125 future bond 1lect10a Required 1994-95
(380 to Sim Chtistal) for all projects proposed for
March branch K0,40MA114 11 1,704,931 119I-92 program year 19')6.97
(Jim Christal to IN 1315)
Local Pattlclpatloa/your Lane 1,100,000 1995-96
Divl4ed load - Spencer to 1.15
Intersection Control Signals 225,000 1991-92
Willowood bike Path 100,000 1991-92
Tura Laou for Arterials 90,000 1991-92
Pedestrian Slgoale 30 000 1991-92
CATEGORY TOTAL g7;6S3'A6J'6
Drafume
Cooper Creek Channel 675U WU 1901-12
Kingfisnar Draiaag4 77,000 1992-93
Pecan Creek Drainage
Bradshaw to RuddelL 230 WUQ 1991-92
CATEGORY TOTAL S1,U73,OW
lira and Lmeraenef Servlees
' Salted Will Device 300,000 1997-99
Outdoor Emsrlucy shine 253 730 1995-96
j CATEGORY TOTAL
urPOrt Larovements
h Load Metes to South H"at Area 1 lOU,DUO Total cost of peoject/all 1994-9$
locally eundtd
11 Infield Dtelaage Improves sot 70,918 (19,861.00-1989.90
iI Land Acquisltloa North 17/33
24.1 Acres 101,393 1994-95
j Lac1 Acquisition 11.3 Acres 54,806 I01 local share of total 1914-95
f Land Acquisition 3L Areu 135,036 project cost/balance 1904-95
North Holding Apron 3,74V subject to FAA 903 match 1994-93
Kunway extension 1,040' 23,46u 1994.95
N.T.R.L. lunway Extension Lighting 1,400 1994.95
Parallel feilway Leteosloa Noldlag 1994-93
Apron I,VDO' 1S 600 1994-95
If`r Stub Tufway to 6.e. Industrial 6,000 1994-93
~ Aru
CO=Ircfal Service Area FAVIDS .12,100 blimiaa Gd
I,1.0. feving 11,500 Lllmlsated
1 beaeutf we Jet Center Aircraft 1S,u7U
Parking Lllmine tsd
Eaglneerla1 and Cobtlagency ( 136 oil 1994-93
CAUGOIY TOTAL
I I
WDUrf boemwbile ( 33O."0 Not recommended
Haiti Library
Rehab., 1996-97
PROGAAN YLAR TOTAL $4,404,306
1053k/l6 Page 41
CIIT Of DENTON
ylVg YLAA CAPITAL ON-MPR V94INT PLA.9
1992-1993
t
PIOJ LCT EST IIUTLD COST Now FM&D STATUS
Streets sad TramsPOrtatlon
t4seh lunch Road, Phase 111 Future bond election raquirnd Part of Phama IT,
TH 1515 to n{{aide Load 170,000 for ell other projects pro- 1998-97
273, sed for 1992-93 program year 1993 91
Street CmnetruSpre ttlodl Re<cm rteuctlon 770,000 PC
000 1997-91
Heetxood Paring 735,000 1100,000, 14'17-971
Inuuacticn Control signals (150.000, 1996-99
Partial Improvement$ to city 100,000 1990-99
Sidewalk system
Oversiaad Participation in 100,000 Not larommedded
Thoroughfares 97 1100,090, 1990-99 000
Turn L Latane as
CAILCORY TOTAL Ioy w+a
Dra_ lam!
1300,0001 1997-931
Coo pit Creek Drainage, Pnua It 1,000,000 5500,000, 1993-911
128,000 Ph 1, 167,000,
ALtaadtr street Draiaga 89-903 0, lI,
1178,000,92-931
~r-100 000000 1992.93
Avenue C CADrain TLOORIe TOTAL
i
Parbs a ton
Civic center pool [spanstoal 1941-95 {
Ranoratlooe 1L,000 ,000 I
cicylDISD 3otat Srisaing 1991-98
Facility at (illy Ryas H.S.a 500,000
Lead Acquisition for 1996-91
Coamudity Park 500,000
1995-46
Neighborhood Park D"110PSmt ~300OLOO0.,0,
CATtaoti TOTAL 51Ito6009
Tln, Polls amd Emarleoe• la rvicae
{ 500,000 1996-97
Reh eblli amts Station Il
(Htlc(aoq street) 1991-98
J
bbut(d Station 14 (Ridge Sw) X7500 000
CATEGORY TOTAL
TLOGRAIt YLAL TOTAL 8,373.000
a Loot projects listad based on praeant conditions god InfcrYt(on - coattnvleg negotiations analas
tsm
ioda decisions ryardld8tbelt wayutor al locate 1115lmil ton its N oti communifor cadet leas end
IOMAS +
{
Page 42
4
i
I
1
J
}
a
r`
. I
CIP COMPARISON
1
May P1 ?,2 1989
vine ate
Adopted c1Pl Recommendation Recommended S Year Plan -
i rw Revised Y
1969-90 9 5,323,000 9 1,930,000 -
j 9 1,173,00D 91,191,]05
90-91 5,622,000 7,503,000
1,376,000 1,140,400
9142 6,464 000 6,612,636
3.5 million 3,901,600
92-93 6,623,000 7,113,000
4,3 million 4,366,111
93-94 N/A 6,143,000
4,5 million 41]]2,000
114,034,000 930,425,636
914,939,696
S Year Schedule
94.93 N!A
N/A 9 3,450,590
95-96 N/A
N/A
3,403,750
96-97 N!A
97-98 N/A 2,67D,000
2,400,000 I
9d-99 J
_3,500,000
913,604,348
l $%90 mad 90-91 adopted, 91.92 and 92-93 are taken under consideration, it I 2 All useds412increase s in iassessed avalue r to d19in 1989~90.
93-94. " tax increases in 1991-92, 1992-93, sad 1993-94 for 12,000,000 more debt.
Worst case financial scenariol Declining delta tax revenue due to Lewisriile Nall and recession,
IfI+% Declining preetttY tax revenue due to reapprsl asi of real ,state collapse and no growth,
12908/181Revised 01!21!89 I
i
i
Page 43
j
I
f UTILITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 1990-94 Utility Deportment Capital Improvements Plan Is based on the
1990.94 Utility Department Planning Forecast, which projects a population
increase from 670000 in 1989 to 77,936 In 1994. This represents an annual
growth rate of 3% per year. The majority of capital expenditures will be J
required to serve the new customers being added to the system. 11
r
it must be recognized that any number of circumstances may effect the
following pr:jections and plans. This document to Intended to serve as a guide
to the dally activities of the Utility Department In its efforts to maintain the i
E high reliability and service quality of the Electric, Water and Wastewater
Systems. At the same time, due to the nature of the utility business, a certain
flexibility is assumed within the document In order to accommodate changes +
as they occur. Factors that most commonly affect consumption and revenues 1
ores
I
j I. Abnormal weather (Drought, heat and rainfall).
f 2. Abnormal growth (A sudden Increase In growth can place serious
strain on the utility systems. A very low growth can highlight
financial problems and lead to larger rate increases).
3. Changes In the local and surrounding economy.
4. Cogeneration Is another factor that may effect the Utility
' operations and financial situation. For example, Texas Woman's
University and The University of North Texas have expressed e
desire to develop cogeneration projects. A decrease in consumption
of two of Denton's top ten users of electricity could effect not only
the Utility, but the citizens as well. Such a decrease would place a
j greeter portion of the debt service and fixed costa upon the
remaining customers. The end result could mean more frequent rate
Increases.
Page 44
1
T~W
I
>I
5. The replacement, upgrading and building of new facilities to serve
th9 expending population and aging Infrastructure is requiring major
construction during the five year planning period.
Following Is on overview of each department.
I ~
i
Electric Department i
I
The Electric System will require $35.040 million In capital funds during the
1990.94 period. In accordance with the 1990-94 Forecast (hereafter referred
to as "the Forecast"), the Electric System expects 4,574 new customers to be
i~ added. Extensive capital expenditures for these customers and Improvements
to maintain reliable service to existing customers make up the majority of the
CIP projects.
One new substation will be added and considerable funds will be used for
customer incentive and load management programs. Also, a portion of the
overhead lines (.5 miles per year) will be converted to underground as part of
the City bee-utificatlon program. A special conversion project ($2.1 million) is ti
Included for the area on University, between 1-35 and Bell Avenue. Other '
i
major changes involve the addition of two hydroelectric units (one each at
i
Lake Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville) and additional building space for a
Central Dispatch facility and Electric Department Personnel. A detailed
listing Is found at the end of this section.
Electric Department - Funding
Funding for tha electric projects will be provided from four main sourcest
1. Bond funds, $26.868 million
2. Current revenues, $7.210 million
3. Aid-ln-Construction, $0.316 million
' f 4. Other sources, $0.646 million
i
1
Page 45
1
1
Electric Department - Proforma
Two major changes were made on the proformes.
1. The first change Involves adding a "Subtotail' line for customer 1
related revenues. This will aid In Management and 8oerd review of
date.
2. The Interest Income (Non-operating) line is Included on the proforme
but not added Into the totals. Since these monies are not Included
at pert of the Utility's funds until final payment of the related long
term debt, generally accepted accounting standards require these
monies be listed for management review but not included In the
totals.
I
The proformes included herein, should be viewed as a planning tool. The
majority of the Information is based upon data as dictated by the Forecast and
other current available information. Some of this data is subject to change.
Items that the Utility Staff are concerned about Includes
1. Off System sales and Wholesale capacity: These numbers are
calculated by TMPA and generally are not received until the third
I week in May.
i
2. Purchased Power and Fuel: Sams as above, except that minor
i
changes have been made. The Utility Staff revised the original
TMPA ten year purchased power and fuel forecast. These changes
are a result of reolsions In growth rates as published In the 1990-94
Pienning Forecast.
3. Net Sales (Megawatt Hours)i MWH toles have been adjusted
1 downward due to review of current fiscal year data. Population and
consumption growth rates for the first four months have been
III I
j approximately one-half of the anticipated Increases. This condition
resulted in modification of megawatt-hour sales for the CIP
Forecast Period. While the megawatt-hours were charged, it must
be noted that the growth rates, as per the Forecast, were NOT
changed.
Page 46
i
i
,I
Electric Department Rate Increases
The Electric Department anticipates a 25% rate Increase In fiscal years 1991
and 1993. This rate increase Is caused primarily by increases In the cost of
purchased power, the planned capital requirements and the effect cf various
load management activities.
Recent developments with ThIPA Indicate the possibility of a reduction in
Denton's portion of the fixed costs which may result in the near term J
possibility of a rate reduction. i
It must be noted that since cogeneration Is subject to so many variables, It Is
not specifically addressed in the above rate making decisions. However, the
effect of large cogeneration facilities being placed In service will result In an
i increase in fixed costa and debt service to the remaining customers,
Electric Department Miscellaneous Information I
Cost of debt service Is expected to Increase from the current 5.43 per KWH to
5.61 KWH in 1994,
The Electric Service Debt-to-Asset Ratio from a current of 31.75% to 47.01 %
In 1994, According to a study released by th American Public Power
Association In 1986, s utility of comparable size should have a 49.0% ratio. f'
1 I
I 1
i
i
f I
II ;
f
J
1
Page 47 j
I
low
1
i
Water Department
The Water Utility will add an estimated 2,256 customers during the planning
period (from 17,972 in 1990 to 20,228 in 1994) and will have a growth rate of
approximately 3.0%. The Denton area population will increase at a steady
rate of a little over three percent 0%) during the planning period.
To provide adequate water service, it is anticipated that $33.304 million
capital funds will be required over the next five years. The major projects will
be the addition of a ten million gallon per dey (MGD) water plant, two-I hIGD {
elevated storage tanks, a water transmission line, and the replacement of
miscellaneous water lines. The new water treatment plant will increase the
maximum cepacity to 40 hIGD. A detailed listing Is located at the end of this
section.
i
Water Department - Funr;tng
1
' Funding for the water projects has four major sourcesi 14
1. Bonds, 422.790 million
2. Current revenue, $3.944 million
3. Ald-in-Construction, $0.913 million
4, tither, $5.657 million
Water Department -Prof orms.
j
The Water Proforma Is based on the consumption amounts as directed by the
1990.1994 Planning Forecasts A total of six (6) major changes were made on
the Water Proforma. They aret
I. Lake Cities was taken out of the forecast model In 1994 due to their
anticipated participation with the tipper Trinity Regional Water
District.
2. Separate rate Increases were input for the wholesale customers.
1
Page 48
3. Production Power expenses have been increased from the previous
year's budget. In last year's budget, the Water and Wastewater
Departments were financing the two hydro units with long term
debt. This caused a decrease in their production power costs and a
corresponding Increase In their long term debt. Since the Electric
D apartment has assurned the responsibility for the hydro plants, the
water and Wastewater Plants will pay for electric service through
this account.
r 4. Purchased Water Expenses are decreasing. These expenses from
1990 to 1994 are lower then previous years actual amounts because
this account only reflects the out-of-pocket expenses as labeled by
i the Income statement. These expenses are the result of e
take-or-pay portion of the current contract between the City of
Dallas and Denton. Denton anticipates taking the majority of their
water from Lake Rey Roberts. This is contingent upon the Lake
filling faster than was previously anticipated. To date, all
indications are In our favor. However, If a drought occurs, or if we
don't get the average rainfall, the cost of purchased water will
Increase.
I
5. Rate increases were limited to a minimum 3.0% and a maximum of
j 8.5%.
6. These proformso include the repayment of the $4 million loan from
the Electric Department. This amount Is split 75 % to the Water and
25% to the Wastewater Departments. The loan is scheduled to be
repaid In nine annual consecutive payments.
Water Department Rete Increases
It Is anticipated that the Water Department will require rate Increases of 8.5%
In 19900 8.5% In 1991, 8.5% In 1992 and 4% In 1994. These Increases are
primarily due to Increased costs associated with the payments for the Ray
j Roberts project, debt service for the recent wster plant upgrade, the new 10
1`400 water
Page 49
.
T-W
I
punt and associated transmission line, storage tank and booster pump station,
required overhead storage tanks, plus the return on investment charge for
these additlons and repayment of outstanding debt to the Electric Department.
Water Department Miscellaneous Financing Information
Changes In the cost of water to Denton customers during the planning period
(1990-1994) will increase cost from a 1990 rate of $2.31 per 1000 gallons to
$2.73 per 1000 gallons in 1994.
Debt service is expected to Increase from $.45 per 1000 gallons In 1990 to $.66
per 1000 gallons in 1954.
1
I
i
i
,
I
ii
i
f
page 50 1
t
i'
Wastev star Oeyartment
The Wastewater Department will add an estimated 1,652 customers during the
planning period. The customer count will increase from 14,750 in 1990 to
16,602 in 1994.
Improvements and replacements to the Wastewater System are projected to
cost $18.04 million. Majo capital items Include an equalization basin,
i
expansion of the wastewater (dent by three b1GQ, oversize sewer lines, replace
obsolete sewer lines, initiate an Infiltration/Inflow study, upgrade several lift
j stations, development plan wastewater lines and purchase miscellaneous
equipment. A detailed listing is Iccated at the end of this section.
Vlsetewater OrQertment - F unding
Funding for the wastewater projects vrill be provided from four main sourcest
1. Bonds, $15.180 million
2. Current revenues, $2.234 mlliion
3. Aid-In-Construction, $0.182 million
i 4. Other, $0.444 million
Wastewater Department - Proforma
l
F The Wastewater Proforma reflects the changes as noted In the Electric and
Water Sectl:ns. Major changes over last year's proforme Includet
1. Growth as established by the 1990-1994 Planning Forecast.
2. Include repayment of the $4.0 million Electric Department Loan.
The Wastewater Department's share of this loan amounts to
approximately $1.0 million.
Production Power expenses have been increased over lest year's
amount for the same reason as described in the Water Department
Section.
I
Page 5.1.
i
i
i -
d
a
ky
Wastewater Department Rate Increases
f
f The Wastewater Department anticipates an 8.5% rate increase during 1990, a
7.0% Increase in 1991, a 6.0% rate Increase in the fiscal years 1992 and 1993,
r
and a 7.0% increase in 1994. Rate increases are the result of the planned
(i expenslons, capital Improvements and Increased maintenance costs.
f
Wastewater Department Miscellaneous Financial Information
The average monthly cost to the residential customer during the planning
period will Increase from the 1990 rate of $11.65 to 315.14 in 1994.
.
Debt service costs will also increase from the 1990 level of $1.068 million to
$2.224 million In 1994.
Due to the major construction activity during the planning period, total
Debt-to-Aseet Ratio will increase from the current 39.9 to 52.3 In 1994. This
j ratio applies to a combination of the Water and Wastewater Departments.
This ratio Is confirming the fact that these departments are financing the
i
majority of their asset acquisition with long term debt instead of with current
r '
f revenues. This trend will begin to reverse once the plants have been buiit.
~ i
i
j Respectfully submitted,
i
R. E. fJelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
1 I
Page 52
i
i
r
i
.
DRAFT
Pd2 Minutes
September 13, 1989
Page 10
Ms. Brock stated that Article 4.01.8 of the
Subdivision Regulations allows the Commission to
find that this addition does not create the need for
additional fire flow and the buildings will be
sprinkled. The City has plans to finish the tie in
of the water lines in the near future. She moved
to recommend approval of the replat of the Endres
Addition. Seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and
unanimously carried (6-0).
I
Hold a public hearing and consider a revised 6 Year {
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and a 6 Year
r-V1
Improvement Schedule, j
Mr. Robbins stated that the same night the Commission j
reviewed the CIP in work session, the Public Utilities
Board (PUB) made a recommendation about the Utility CIP.
He said that the Commission has met several times-on the
General Government Plan and he would answer questions.
He pointed out changes in the CIP and Five Year Plan.
The reason for the changes is a more detailed look at the
fiscal impact, tax increases, revenue projections, and
the need for the improvements. Development activity has
not increased as rapidly as anticipated. Based on these
factors, staff is recommending a less aggressive CIP.
The Five Year Schedule has been added to the general
government CIP. The projects recommended by the
Commission are in the plan but are moved further into the
future. The recommendations have been stretched out over
10 years. The staff is suggesting the schedule to make
- a distinction between the five year plan adopted by the
Council and the projects that are having to be pushed
back another five years. The schedule could be adopted
or it could be used as an item to be taken into
consideration when making decisions about future DIP.
Mr. Ham stated that the poor economy has had an impact
on utilities. The City has not sold as much water this
year as previously. Some projects have been pushed back
to ease the burden of fiscal year 1990. However, the
overall five year plan did not change significantly in
the total amount of money. Expenses have been cut. The
major change is that the booster pump station and new
water plant were originally scheduled for 1992 but will
be pushed back to 1993, originally, the plan was to
spend three million dollars on the booster station in
1990, but now will spend 1.6 million. The architectural
requirements for the pump station and tank were cut. The
tank will be steal instead of concrete.
Page 53
P ~
P
7i1
x Qr
1
PAZ Minutes DRAFT
September 13, 1984
11
page
Mr, Tullos Projecto bstated
that electric utilities has
Problem ack, The Lewisville Hydro roect Pushed
problem gutting off the ground and an extensi nahasebeen
asepakedra fotri ,n
oTheyr
fo are trying to get the CIP up nydate in
pr a be
sale, In New York, they like to
know what the money wilt be spent on exactly, There have
been
when theeCIP Wasndoneaoriginally. s eionl early spring
fiber optics for the telephone sYstThe only new item is
` A
I m.
Mitchell Turner, said that he had a question about the
CIP in regards to the library. He wanted to know what
the taxpayers voted for in the 1986 bond issue, and what
is being proposed in the CIP.
were two items totalin In the bond issue, there
land acquisition for g a million dollars. There was rki
and J 1991, The Blue Ribb nng Co mitttee r madexpans tr In
recommendation that additional
the main library parking be aired a strong
, preferably across the streetUfrom itr
Somewhere along the line, a decision has been made not
to do that, but instead to build a south library,
Mr. Robbins stated that a consultant study was done with
the Library Board concerning library expansion, ;380,000
will be used to acquire the site and $20,000 was spent
on the consultant. The proposed site was shown on a
slide,
Mr. Turner asked if the school board owns the land,
Mr. Clark said they own part of it,
Mr. Turner said that he is pleased with the proposed one
cent tax increase as opposed to the original
proposal
however, he opposes any tax increase at all becaus;
Lewisville already has a fourteen cent tax advantage over
i Denton and it competes with Denton for new industry, He
said that he favors bond elections to let taxpayers make
the decisions. Overall, he feels that the current CIP
proposal is a more realistic approach than tho one
presented earlier in the year,
Mr. Clark said that he is pratty sure the Library Board's
recommendation was presented to the 91 Committee,
Page 54
4N
h I
e
DRAFT
Paz Minutes
September 13, 1989
Page 12
Ms. Brock stated that she is concerned that the new
library will not coordinate with the compact and
contiguous growth policy in the Oenton Development Plan.
Tax money should not be spent on the new site. The
Library Board may not be aware of the policy.
Mr. Clark stated that two years of research was done on 1
the area across the street from the existing library.
The floodway effects the area, and building would have
to be cantilevered which is costly. Another issue was
getting people across the street safely. There is a bend
I in Oakland causing a safety hazard. Realigning Oakland
would be too costly. Other alternatives were to take
away park land or purchase the Woman's Building which
would be difficult to obtain.
The Commission discussed the allocations for the library.
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that if the new library were built
on City property, it would not violate the compact growth yl
IF policy and would save the City almost a million dollars.
Ms. Brock said it is bad to pay an expert $20,000 and
t ignore the expert's advice, but it is worse to take the
advise just because it was paid for. She asked if the
Council made a definite decision that the new library
should be in the south.
Mr. Robbins said no.
Mr. Turner suggested branch libraries at the recreation
centers.
Ms. Brock stated that there is one at the Martin Luther
King Center which has had a positive response.
Mr. Engelbrecht said there may have been some discussions
about using grade school libraries.
Ms. Brock said that she does not know how much Mr.
Turner's suggestion would cost, but it seems to make
sense.
Mr. Kamman said the books could be rotated.
c
Mr. Engelbrecht said the word "south" cculd be stricken
from the recommendation.
Page 55
IF low
P
i
Imi
~Jj
PRZ Minutes
September 13, 1989
Page 13
Ms. Brock said that the Commission could recommend that
libraries be established at recreation centers.
Mr. Engelbrecht said that the rew library should be
located on dedicated land or on City property. He moved
to recommend that the new library facility be located on
City property or on donated land to be consistent with
the Denton Development Plan, and that the word "south"
be stricken from page 7 so that it reads to construct a
j new library in the 91-92 CIP. Seconded by Ms. Brock and
unanimously carried (6-0).
Mr. Engelbrecht stated that he would like to see the
square footage of the areas to be landscaped along
II University Drive and Teasley Lane.
Mr. Robbins explained that Teasley will not be as lushly
landscaped as University Drive.
j Mr. Engelbrecht said he would like more detail.
Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the five year
CIP with the changes about the library. Seconded by Mr.
Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (e-0).
Mr. O1 sscock eft the meeting.
VI. Consider recommending approval of the preliminary replat
of the Denton Area Teachers Credit Union, Lot 11 Block
A, and part of Lot 2, Block 8, Baines Addition, and part
of Lot 2, Block 25, Original Town of Denton Into Denton
Area Teachers Credit Union, Lots 1 and 2, Block A.
STAFF REPORT: Mr. Yost stated that the plat is a 2.505
acre tract located one block west of Elm Street, between
Mulberry and Sycamore Streets. The tract and all
1 adjacent land is zoned central business. An existing 6"
sewer line will be abandoned. A 16 foot utility easement
containing a now 6" sewer line is proposed. The options
for the exact location of this easement are noted on the
plat, and the petitioner will choose one of them at the
time of final platting. There is one lot adjacent to the
site which is used residentially. The applicant is aware
E { that the landscape ordinance requires a six foot
screening device separating the lots.
Page 56
I
i
F
I■
\ I
4
i
t
Y
R
2856L J
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROPOSED BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on the 13th day of September, 1989 the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved a list of capital improvements which
in the opinion of the commission ought to be constructed during
the forthcoming five year period; and
k'HEREAS, the Commission also recommended a five year schedule
of capital improvements for the period 1994 to 1999; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager furnished a copy of such recom-
mendations to the City Council on the 3rd day of November, 1989;
and 1
WHEREAS, all of the above actions were taken in compliance
with the requirements of Section 10.03(x)(6) of the City Charter;
l~ and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to formally adopt the rec-
ommendations of the Commission; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION 1. That the Council hereby approves the attached
list o cap to improvements which will u and theb capital
structed during the forthcoming five year period based
improvement program for the electric and water utilities,
on funding capability.
SECTION 11. That the Council hereby takes under consider-and
ation of list recommendations icapital improvements for
the years 1994-95 to 1998-99.
111' SECTION III. That and resolution shall become effective
immed ate y p o approval.
i
I
LJ
K,
Y:i r
.
f
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of November, 1989.
RAY STEPRENS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERSO CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
_
BY.,
EE '
I
I~
i
j
I
PAGE 2
i
pr low
M J}•9
C
'I
F 4
I
,
E
1 f
i
I
ly 1
I
t1
i J
f 1
44J ~ 1
S
n Y
l
2651L-1/3689
f
N0.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COPII'ETI'1'1VE~Pr FNTAN SUPPLIESN ORA SERVICES;
FOR THE PURCHASE OF 1SA''ERIA1.5, E U
PROVIDING FOR THE F.XPENDITURF: OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING J
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DACE.
WIIEREAS, the City has solicited, receiyved and tabulated
competitive d f lu aewith the teprocedures of
ment,
meat, supplies or services in accordance
state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee lens {
reviewed and recommended that the herein describd bids ar esthe '
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment,
services as shown in the Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the
of the
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase
materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; NOW, THEREFORE:,
i
I TILE COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF DENTON IIEREDY ORDAINS:
SECTION tuipment bered item in the
or servicesowshownuinetlia a
J
"Bid gent P filedalaccordingl tot the b difnu mberf assignedy'thereto,asare~
A
hereby Accepted and Approved as being the lowest responsible bids 1
for such items: J
BID 1TFM
NUMBER 170. VF:NDUR AMOUfi'C
j
{ $]402609.00_._
RFP_1104A IDIi
15■122~?0
RFP #1027 C-TEC SY51'EMS INC.
i
y
SECTION If. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numberecJ MI of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer
of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
SECTION Ill. That should the City and persons submitting
approve en accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to
enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the
acceptance, approval, and awarding, of the bids, the City Manager
or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute
the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions
specifications, atnndnrda, quantities and specified sums contained
j in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and
accepted.
SECTION 1V. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbeceR--Hems of the submitted bidb the City Council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and ill
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contr-ct made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
immeaia e y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , l9ag.
RAY-S TI; FIl Ei15;i71YCFFi
i ATTEST:
7 ER IFERWATERS, cry-sEC ur-mi
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORDS:
DEBRA ADAMI PRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTURNEY
~ 1 1
BY:
k
I
PAGE TWO
f
s
F.
d
Y
S
DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: RFP #104A - CIS SYSTEM HARDWARE
RECOMME14DATION: We recommend this Purchase Order be approved and
the Contract for CIS System Hardware be awarded to IBM in the
amount of $140,609.00.
SUMMARY: This tranr;action is for the purchase of IBM Model 125 RT
PC Computers, Color Monitors and related ite:rs and maintenance.
The choice of the ESRI System requires the hardware for the CIS to
I be specifically IBM. The ESRI proposal contained an option to
IEI purchase equipment from them. The response from IBM was
considerably less ESRI and included the software and
j maintenance pricing.
f BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet for equipment, Memo from Gary
Collins, Director of Data Processing, and PO #93561
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS Or GROUPS AFFECTED: CIS System Users
i
{ FISCAL IMPACT: Certificates of obligation funds for acquisition of
CIS System and related items
Respect Ily submitted:
U
Ll- oyc Aarrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
m : Tom Shaw, C.P.M. V
itl Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
i
. Marshal C.P.M.
itl Purchasing Agent.
020.DOC
I
a
I I I
RFP# 104A I I I
BID EQUIPMENT FOR OIS SYSTEM } ESRI IBM I
I
OPEN
ACCOUNT # I I I
I I
I
# I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR I VENDOR _
I~ I I
1 I
1 1 1 1 MODEL RT PC I I $27x072.00
I I
2 I l I COLOR DISPLAY i I $2,680.00
$1,341.00
3 1 1 1 1/4" STREAMING TAPE
I
EA I TOTAL 1, 2 AND 3 i $47,858.00 { $31,093.00
I I
I I
4 1 1 1 1ST SYSTEM SOFTWARE LICENSE i N/A i $3x421.00
E I I N/A I $2,588.00 I
5 I 1 I ADDL. SYSTEM SOFTWARE LIC.
6 1 HARDWARE MAINTENANCE i N/A I $1,263.00
~ f I I I I
I I } I
THIS TAB SHEET SHOWS UNIT I I I f
I COST. SEE QUANTITIES ORDEREDI I I A
ON PURCHASE ORDER #93581 i I
I
I I I 1
i
d
x
i
y r, ~ A
k
a
C!T y of DENTON, TEXAS 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
F]_EMORANDUM
DATE: October 16, 1989
TO: Lloyd 11arrell, City Manager
IR114: Gary A, Collins, Director of Data Processing
SUBJECT: Purchase of IBM RTs
The purchase of the IBM RTs is for the purpose of providing work
stations for the GIS system. When we evaluated the proposals for
the GIS systems the final two vendors were ESRI and Prime. The
ESRI proposal utilized IBM RTs as the work stations for this system
and their software is designed to run on the IBM RT workstation.
The Prime proposal utilized Sun workstations and their software is
j designed to run on the Sun workstations. As you may know the City
of Denton has selected the ESRI proposal and their contract has an
option where the City can acquire IBM RTs from ESRI at $47,858.
At this same time IBM submitted a proposal for IBM RTs that by
utilizing the state and local government discount allows the City
of Denton to acquire IBM RTs at a cost of $31,093, I am
recommending that we acquire 4 IBM RTs directly from IBM and take
advantage of the local and state government discount offered by
1 IBM. I am also recommending that we acquire the necessary software
for these workstations from IBM at a cost $3,421 for the first set
of licenses and $2,588 for the subsequent three sets of licenses.
These prices represent a 21N discount from IBM for local and state
governments.
If I can provide any further information or you have any questions
please feel free to call me.
Gary Collins
Director of Data Processing
RTMEM001
y
q 1
1
CONFIRMING ORDER.
(IF MARKED) uHASE ORDER N0: PC 93581
DO NOT DUPLICATE L Tn,s number must appear on an
rvcices, deli Blips, cases,
ctns., boxes, packing slips and bins
Req No: 6b No, L/~ It 02 89
Date: Pape No. 01
VENDOR AARCFI4&NG DVG'ON / 901.8 TEXAS STREET/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201
NAME/ IBM 817/566.8311 DIFINMEM267.0012
P•D• BOX 660176 CENTRAL ONLY
ADDRESS DALLASxTX 75219 DELIVERY DATA PROCESSING
ADDRESS 901 8 TEXAS ST I
DENTON* TX 76201
i
VENDORNO. 11149000 DEUVERYOUOTED It 30 a9 FOB DESTINATION
TERMS
1 ~ .
01 4 EA 3M RT MODEL 125
OM VENDOR CAT• I N / A 27@072.000 1089288&00
1 02 4 EA ITY 0 20587 VENDOR CAT* 0 N / A 2x690.000
CLOR MEGAPEL DISPLAY 5081-019 10x720&00
{
03 4 EA ITY l 20643 VENDOR CAT. I N / A 1@341.000 5x364.00
1/4" STREAMING TAPE 6157-002
04 1 EA ITY i 20554 VENDOR CAT& If N / A
1RST SET OF SYSTEM SOFTWARE LIC 3x421.000 3x421.00
05 EA ITY 9 20556 VENDOR CAT* 0 N / A 295886000 7x764.00
DDITIONAL SET OF SYSTEM SOFTWARE LIC
06 EA ITY T 93921 VENOGR CAT& 0 N / A x052.00
AROWARE MAINTENANCE 19263.000 5
t I
PAGE TOTAL : 1406609400
01 611 008 0017 9103 140&609.00 GRAND TOTAL 1 140x609.00 1
VENDOR l19TRI10 3. Term;- Net 30 IlJrxea 01h"" IpxCM•Q 1
ll dAl ceh copy.
1. Se d apng Invoke ke Wi wi, lnetructwro, F.0 & Destination p epaFd lunksx omx w n x~x~ •d)
2. BA to -Accounts payable 15 Shpp ng
. No federal or state sales leas shall be included e
21S E, $&Kinney St in pekes billed.
Demon Tx 76201
VENDOR Purchasing Division i
i
DATES NOVEMBER 21, 1989
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: RFP #1027 - MAINTENANCE WANG EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this proposal be awarded to C-TEC
Systems, Inc., in the amount of $1,211.40 per month for Word
Processing Center equipment and $55.20 per month for Park
Department equipment, total price $15,199.20 per year.
SUMMARY: This proposal is for the on-site maintenance of the Wang
E equipment and software utilized by the City of Denton. It will
cover a period of time from January 1, 1990, to January 1i 1991.
Only one proposal was received, however, it is approximately 208
lower than last year.
BACKGROUND: Memo from Gary Collins, Director of Data Processing
PROGRAMS, 6EPARTMENPS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Word Processing Center,
Parks and Recreation Administration
FISCAL IMPACT: 1989/90 Budget Funds Account Number
100-036-0006-8341 for $14,536,80 and Account Number
100-031-0060-8341 for $662.40.
Respec lly I i ted:
01
I V'
pub Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
o J. Marshall,
J1 : Purchasing Agent
020.DOC
YY~
a `
.
~s!V
F
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 14, 1989
TO: Tom Shaw, Assistant Purchasing Agent
FROM: Gary Collins, Director of Data Processing
SUBJECT: MAINTENANCE ON WANG EQUIPMENT
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for maintenance or the
existing Wang equipment. At this time, it is my recommendation
that C-TEC continue to provide the equipment maintenance from
January 1, 1990 to .lanuary 1, 1991. The recommended bid
represents a 20k decrease in the cost of maintenance from the
prior year.
If you need any further information, please contact me. l
ary o I TI ns
wp
1245o I
P
I~
%
k
I
r
t
I
j, 1
#Fill
1
Z1
CITY of DENTON 1215 E. McKinney / Denton, Teyls 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 15, 1989
TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM: Tom Josey, Municipal Court Administration
THRU: Jim L. Bunyard, Treasurer
SUBJECT: IMPACT OF ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL COURT
CHAPTER OF THE DENTON CODE OF ORDINANCES
There will be little impact from the proposed amendment to the
Court ordinances. Although there are many changes and additions
to the text of the ordinance, these changes reflect what the
Court has been doing by State law:
1. Sets a $200.00 maximum on the offense of "Violation of
Promise To Appear" (section 8-34) and authorizes the
maximum court fees, warrant fees, and special expenses
allowable by state law. i
2. The office of Municipal Court Clerk is established and the
Court Administrator or Clerk of the Court positions are
made synonymous. This position is to be appointed by the
Executive Director of Finance and confirmed by the City
Manager
3. Establishes an Associate Municipal Court Judge to preside
as needed by the full time Judge and is appointed in the
:naaner prescribed by City Charter.
4. Prosecutor is to be appointed by the City Attorney.
S. The Bailiff(s) to be furnished by the Chief of Police as
requested by the Presiding Judge.
b. Guidelines for record production and preservation are
i established according to state law.
7. Directors of City departments and their representatives are
authorized to issue citations for violations of City
Ordinances.
,F
a
ra
f
Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell
November 15, 1989
Page 2
8. Guidelines for Court appearances and releases from city
jail are established.
9. Maximum fees for Court and warrants are authorized and
/ follow state law,
10. Article V establishes a system of enforcing all city
ordinances not usually enforced by peace officers, such as
health and building codes.
All changes are modeled after State code and are designed not to
conflict with any current laws.
Tom osey
XC: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
Pebta Drayovitch, City Attorney
TJ/ljw
4961E
~ I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 (MUNICIPAL COURT) OF THE CODE OF
THE CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS, BY REPEAL OF THE EXISTING "COURT"
CHAPTER AND BY ADOPTION OF A NEW "MUNICIPAL COURT" CHAPTER;
PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF $200.00 THEREFORE, FOR
VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 8-34 THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 8
MUNICIPAL COURT
ARTICLE I.
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COURT
I
Sec. 8-1. Creation.
There is hereby created a municipal court to be known as the
f Municipal Court of the City of Denton, which shall be comprised
of two divisions. Any reference hereinafter to the Court shall
be understood to mean the municipal Court of the City of Denton.
Sec. 8-2. Jurisdiction.
~_•I The municipal court of the city established by the City
Charter shall have jurisdication in all criminal cases arising
under the ordinances of the city and in all cases arising under
the criminal laws of the state, pursuant to Section 29.003,
Government Code. The municipal court has jurisdiction in the
forfeiture and final judgment of all bail bonds and personal
bonds taken in criminal cases of which the court has
jurisdiction.
Sec. 8-3 - 8-10. Reserved.
Ir MW
a y
1
d .
ARTICLE II.
OFFICERS OF THE COURT
Sec. 8-11. Presiding Judge of the Municipal Court.
One division of the Court shall be presided over by a Judge
known as the Presiding Judge of the Municipal Court, who shall be
directly responsible to the City council for the conduct of the
court in a dignified manner and in accordance with the laws of
this State and the ordinances of the City of Denton. Such Judge
shall also be a magistrate. The Presiding Judge shall have the
powers, duties and qualifications for Municipal Judge as
prescribed by the City Charter.
Sec. 8-12. Associate Municipal Court Judge.
The Court may be presided over by a judge known as the
Associate Municipal Court Judge, who shall be a magistrate with
the same judicial and magisterial powers and duties as the
Presiding Judge of the Municipal Court, and who shall be
appointed in the manner prescribed by the City Charter, and shall
possess the same qualifications as the Municipal Judge. The
Associate Municipal Court Judge shall preside under direction of
the Presiding Judge.
Sec. 8-13. Municipal Court Clerk.
(a) In order to release the Presiding Judge of the Municipal
Court from all administrative responsibilities relative to
personnel performing services supportive to the Court, the
office of the Municipal Court Clerk is hereby established as
a division of the Court.
E Ib) The Municipal Court Clerk shall be appointed by the
Executive Director of Finance, subject to confirmation by
the City Manager, and shall have the powers and duties
prescribed by the laws of this State and the City Charter.
Any references to court Administrator, Clerk of the Court,
or Clerk shall be understood to mean Municipal Court Clerk.
(c) The Municipal Court Clerk shall appoint Deputy Court Clerks
as needed, subject to approval of the Executive Director of
Finance and the City Manager, and such deputies shall act in
and for the Municipal Court Clerk in the performance of
their duties.
Id) mThe inutesiofptheCCourtCproceedings, deputies shall issue
2 -
I
A ~
process, make certificates and affix the Court seal thereto,
and generally perform the duties for the Court that a county
clerk performs for a County Court.
sec. 8-14. Prosecutor-
The City Attorney shall appoint a suitable and qualified
person to hold the position of Assistant City Attorney, who shall chared be subject to with eotduty of her assignments as the City sAttorney tmaynd
direct. I
Sec. 8-15. Court Bailiffs A ointment and Duties.
or o more t poupon lice t officers request to serve udge,
(a) Th chief urnish one of
f
Bailiffs during the convening of the Court, and when, in the
proper ndecorum said Judge, to maintain
(b) The principal duties of the Court Bailiff shall be as
followss I
y
1. To preserve order and decorum while court is in session]
~ 2, Provide security to the Courts buildings
3. Assemble and supervise witnesses and jurors;
f
I 4, Attend to the jury and inform the Judge about the needs
l and decisions of the juryi
5. Maintain custody of prisoners in the courtroom an
arrange for their transportation to jail when requested
by the Judge;
6. Transfer messages and perform other tasks assigned by j
the Judge.
sec. 8-16 - 8-20. Reserved. I
ARTICLE III.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURT
Sec. 6-21. Criminal Com leints and Pleadin s,
(a) All rocdings in the Court laint prepared and filed byaor under be commenced on a written
comp
- 3 -
I
t.
t;
V
.
the City Attorney or an Assistant City Attorney, except when
State law provides that a written complaint is unnecessary.
(b) when no written complaint is required, the proceeding shall
commence upon the filing of the citation.
(c) Complaints and citations shall be filed with the Municipal
Court Clerk.
(d1 Complaints shall begin "In the name and by authority of the
State of Texas and shall conclude "...against the peace and
violationfofha city ordinance, theecomplaint e may salso
conclude "contrary to the said ordinance..4.1f
(e) Complaints may be signed by any credible person on
theinfoCirmation and
belief, and
Assistant sworn City Attorney,na t Jude,
Municipal Court Clerk, or Deputy Court Clerk, each of whom, {
for that purpose, shall have the authority to administer
oaths.
(f) All pleas shall either be made in writing and filed with the
Municipal Court Clerk, or made in open court before a Judge.
(9) Any additional pleadings in the court shall be in writing
` and filed with the Municipal Court Clerk, except when waived
by a Judge.
(h) The Municipal Court Clerk shall file the original complaint
and the original of other papers and proceedings in each
case under the direction of the Judges. Such documents
constitute the records of the Court and a separate record
book shall not be required. 1
(1) The records of the Court, including dockets shall be
preserved for a period of at least three (3) years following
the disposition of any particular cause, and thereafter, the
same may be disposed of, or destroyed upon authorization of
the city Attorney. The Court's permanent minutes may be
maintained by computer records or any other method I
authorized by State Law.
Sec. 8-22. furores
All jurors shall be residents of the City of Denton and
shall possess the same qualifications as jurors in the State
courts. '
Sec. 8-23. Rules Oovernine Proceedings.
All proceedings in the Court shall be governed by the laws
4 -
-F low
F
i'e l
" 7 S
y _
i
` of the State of Texas. In those areas not specifically covered
by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and elsewhere in the
Texas laws, or by ordinance, the Presiding Judge of the Municipal
court shall establish such Court rules as are necessary to
establish reasonable and consistent procedures for the operation
of the Court.
I
Sec. 8-24. No Com ]aint to be Dismissed Except U 20n Order
of a Judge.
No complaint shall be dismissed except upon order of a Judge
and in accordance with the law.
Sec. 8-25 - 8-30. Reserved.
ARTICLE IV.
ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURT
Sec. 8-31. Budgetary Responsibilities.
The Presiding Judge of the Municipal Court shall participate
in the budget process of the City of Denton as it relates to all
1 personnel and ycowith the Judos ' Office nnected therewith. The bthe cour udgetaryroom,
and all appurtenances
responsibilities and procedures as to all other support personnel
of the Court, and appurtenances thereto shall be as directed by
the Municipal Court Clerk, subject to the approval of the
i Executive Director of Finance and the City Manager or his
` designee.
Sec. 8-32. Colleotion and Disbursement of Funds.
1
The Municipal Court Clerk shall establish formal procedures
for the collection and disbursement of funds so that all fines,
fines disbursed themCityeTreasury.
feeso I
accounted costst and All monies
Sea, 8-33. Authority to Issue Citations.
I
A director of any city department, or his authorized
representative, shall have the power to issue one or more
citations for violation of City ordinances to any person to
appear in the Court, if the Direotor or representative has
probable cause to believe that the person is criminally
responsible for any offense within the jurisdiction of the Court.
i
-5_
1 C'
1
i Sec. 8-34. Violation ~f Promise to Appear.
r (a) A person lawfully released from custody, whether by osting
bond or by signing a written notice to appear, on condition
that he subsequently appear in the Court, shall appear in
accordance with the terms of his release.
(b) The requirement for appearance in Court is met if counsel
appears on behalf of a person required to appear.
(c) For purposes of this section, "custody" means an arrest or a
detenti~in for purposes of issuing a written citation by a
pol-)ce cfficer or by a person authorized to issue citations
under Section 8-16 of this Chapter.
' (d) An offense under this section is a class C misdemeanor
punishable by a fine of $1.00 to $200,00.
I
Sec. 8-35. Court Fees.
I
Court costs or fees are hereby authorized to be imposed and
collected in accordance with the provisions of the state law and
the maximum fees therein expressed are hereby authorized to be
E imposed.
3
1i
' j sec. 8-36. Warrant Fees and Special Expenses,
(a) Warrant fees are hereby authorized to be imposed and
1 collected in accordance with the provisions of Article
45.06, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and the maximum fees
1 therein expressed are hereby authorized to be imposed.
(b) s
the pecial expenses for services performed in cases in which
becausesoffacthis tionstbyeor on require that
of h the case
defendant dismissed hich
were subsequent to the date of the alleged offense are
hereby authorized to be imposed and collected in accordance
with the provisions of Article 45.06 Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure.
i
(c) The Court is hereby authorized to assess as a special
expense, an amount not exceeding Ten Dollars ($10.00) in
traffic cases, where state law requires dismissal or allows
dismissal due to some act of the defendant. Those instances
j are the taking of a driver safety course, correction of an
I expired driver's license, expired motor vehicle inspection
sticker and expired registration within ten (10) days of the
issuance of the citation and any other instance as provided
by state law.
Sec. 8-37 - 8-39. Reserved.
6 -
r
r
' ARTICLE V.
INSPECTION AND ABATEMENT WARRANTS
Sec. 8-40. Definitions.
For the meanings hereinafter designatedhe following words shall
have the mean
Inspection warrant - A written order, issued by a magistrate and Sec
comman desftoinedetermid in thetpresence ofdang
violation or violations of any City ordinance or other law that
` provides for such inspections to be conducted by City inspectors,
and, when the inspector is also a peace officer, the City Code, ,
laws of the State of Texas and the United States.
k l
inspector - Any peace officer of the State of Texas or an
offic al inspector for any department of the City of Denton,
Texas, which is charged with code enforcement, including, but not
lted to, inspectors for athe nd departments of Planning, Building
Inspection, Rousing, Fire,
Sea. 8-41. Warrants Authorized.
Except as provided in section 8-40, inspectors are hereby
F authorized to seek and obtain iInspection iWarrants fromt
magistrate before marovision of this Code of ordinances or other
enforcement of any p a
( law that provides for such inspection, when the inspector is also
a peace officer, incidental to the enforcement of the City Code,
1 laws of the State of Texas, and the United States. A magistrate
is hereby authorized to issue such warrants subject to the
requirements of this Chapter.
i
Sec. 8.42. Warrants Not Required.
Inspection Warrants shall not be required under the
following circumstances:
(a) when permission to inspect has been granted by someone
apparently having charge or control mfthose o remiset)mayrbe
the purpose of this subsection, po
ay, in writing or by some other action
i granted either
consent; or
(b) when there exists an imminent danger or peril to human life,
limb, or property and any delays resulting from the
application for an inspection Warrant would materially
increase the likelihood of loss from such danger or perils
or
7
LJ
T I
k'.
B
4
(c) when the inspection can be executed in areas held open to
the general publics or
(d) when the inspection is of a business recognized by law as
being a traditionally licensed and regulated enterprise for
which no reasonable expectation of privacy exists.
Sec. B-43. Requirement for Issuance of Inspection Warrant. i
(a) No Inspection Warrant shall be issued except upon citation
to specific laws requiring or permitting inspections or on
the presentation of evidence of probable cause to believe
that a violation or violations of the Code of Ordinances, or
~,--1 state or federal statutes providing for such inspections to
be made by City inspectors are present in the premises
sought to be inspected. In determining probable cause, the
magistrate is not limited to evidence of specific knowledge,
but may consider any of the followings
1. the age and general condition of the premises;
2. previous violations or hazards found present in the
premises;
3. the type of premisest
4. the purposes for which the premises are used; and
5. the presence of hazards or violations in, and the
general condition of, premises near the premises sought
to be inspected.
(b) A sworn affidavit setting forth substantial facts toward
establishing probable cause or the statutory basis for
inspection shall be filed in every instance in which an
Inspection Warrant is requested.
i
Sec. 8-44. Inspection Warrant Formalities.
An Inspection Warrant issued pursuant to this Chapter shall
be sufficient if it contains the following requisitess
(a) that it run in the name of "The State of Texas;
(b) that it identify, as near as may be, those premises to
be inspected;
(c) that it command an inspector to inspect forthwith the
premises described; and
(d) that it be dated and signed by the magistrate.
- 8
y
t
Sec. 8-45. Execution of warrants.
An inspector to whom an inspection warrant is delivered
shall execute it without delay and forthwith return it to the
proper magistrate. It may be executed within three days from the
time of its issuance, and shall be executed within a shorter
period if so directed in the warrant. If such persons cannot be
found, upon execution of the warrant, a copy of said warrant
shall be affixed to the front door of the building or premises
inspected.
Sec. 8-46. Days Allowed for Warrant to Run.
The time allowed for the execution of an inspection warrant
shall be three whole days, exclusive of the day of its issuance
and of the lay of its execution. The m.-jistrate issuing a
warrant under the provisions of this Article shall endorse on
such warrant the date and hour of the issuance of the same.
Sec. 8-47. How Return is Made.
Upon returning the inspection warrant, the inspector shall
state on the back of the same, or on some paper attached to it,
the manner in which it has been executed and shall likewise
deliver to the magistrate a copy of the report resulting from
that inspection.
Sec. 8-48. Power of Inspector Executing warrant.
i
The execution of a warrant issued pursuant to this Article
shall not include any authority to make arrests or to seize
tangible goods of a violation, except where the inspector is a
peace officer or the items are to be seized by a peace officer
and are within the items listed in Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure, Article 18.02 (1)-191 and (11).
Sec. 8-49. Records to be Kept.
The magistrate shall keep a record of all proceedings had
before him in the cases of inspection warrants as part of the
official records of his court.
E Sao. 8-50. Conflicts.
No provision of this Article is intended to conflict with
any state or federal law and the powers and rights granted herein
are intended to be in addition to any rights granted by state or
4 federal law.
- 9
rv a a. '
1
f
SECTION II. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective
which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or
provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the
extent of any such conflict.
SECTION III. That all sections of this ordinance except for
section 8-34 shall become effective immediately from the date of
passage and approval.
Section B-34 shall become effective fourteen (14) days from
the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby a
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published '
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of
its passage.
1989. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of _
I
4 RAY STEPAENS, MAYOR
f ATTEST:
i I
i
Bye
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY 1
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
Bye
I'
I
j 1
- 10 -
I
T-M
4
-S cr
i
a
II
II JI
1
{
1
1
I
~ I
q ~
DATE: 1?/;ib
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City manager J
SUBJECT: Ordinance Providing for Hazardous Materials Reimbursement {
RECOMMENDATION: That the Ordinance Providing for Hazardous Materials
Reimbursement be adopted.
1
SUIV ARY: This ordinance allows for the city of Denton to recoup losses
responding to hazardous materials incidents as recommended by
the Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA, Title III).
BACKGROUND: One small incident can cost the City of Denton's various
departments much overtime payr equipment and useage in-
cluding specialized material totalling tens of thousands
to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
J
y
3 PROGRXjS, DEPAV7IENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED.
utilities, public works - engineering, streets, solid waster environmental J
services, fire and police, communications, emergency management, and muni-
cipal laboratory. Others may also be involved.
FISCAL IMPACT, None, if adopted.
Respectt ily submitted:
Lloyd V. Ha~r ty Manager
j Prepared by:
it
John Lee Cook, Jr., Fire Chief
Same
Title
Approved:
Rick Svehla, Deputy city Manager
Names- ,
Title
T-N
v xr*
J1i
a
v r
*MJ a9-oat r
D
TO., Mr. R. Svehla, Deputy City PLaraper LL,~l 15
FROM: J. L. Cook, Jr., Fire Chief wh
nAT6: 15 November, 1999
RR: 11AZ-MAT RRIMRUE R4FMr
{
1 We have requested that Courk;il consider for adoption an ordinance that would
authorize the Fire Department to coordinate haz-mat incidents and act as the
City's agent in recovering any and all costs associated with a haz-mat
incident.
We feel that we need this ordinary-.e because:
11 Grants authority to seek reimbursement for expenditures
I 2) Centralizes reimbursement process
V
3) Sets precedent that haz-mat incidents are not normal incidents paid for by
the general fund. A haz-mat incident is beyond our scope arks should be
treated as a special case.
~ J
j 4) Sets responsibilities in a haz-mat incident with the person (a) on
1 corporation (a) creating the incident.
All activities covered by this proposed ordinance are normal SOP'S.
This proposed ordinance simply grants us the specific legNl authority to cuver +
existing prantices.
Should you need further Information in this regard, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
` JLC/eo
I
k
low
a
+a
2763L
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING CHAPTER 10
(FIRE PREVENTION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY THE ADDITION OF
SECTION 10-5 THERETO; ESTABLISHING
FOR A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SPILL AFFECTINTHAT ANY PTY 1LE
G PROP RTYWITHIN STHESCITY
SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ALL CLEAN-UP COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, upon the recommendation of the City Manager, the
City Council wishes to authorize the Fire Department to identify
- -1 and control hazardous material incidents and coordinate the as-
sistance of other departments and agencies as might be necessary;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary
and proper to establish procedures for reimbursement for the costs
incurred in removal of hazardous wastes within the City of Denton;
k NOW, THEREFORE,
I
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
ill
SECTION I. That Chapter 10 (Fire Prevention) of the Code of
Ordinances s hereby amended b
thereto which shall read as followsthe addition of Section 10-5
Sec. 10-5. Hazardous Materials Reimbursement.
(a) Any party who accidently,
tionally causes or is rponsiblee fo yea ospillLeof
Cityrshall beeliable affecting tthe property within the
incurred by the Fire Departments andt thof all cst
e other ode-
partments and agencies which assist it, to abate
such an event. The remedy provided by this section
shall be in addition to any other remedies provided
by law.
(b) For
purposes of this section, "hazardous materials"
shall be defined as any substances or materials in a
quantity or form which, in the determination of the
Fire Chief or his authorized representative
unreasonable and imminent risk to the life, phealth
4 or safety of persons or property or to the ecological
balance of the environment, and shall include, but 1
not be limited to, such substances as explosives,
I radioactive materials, petroleum or petroleum prod-
ucts or gases, poisons, etiologic (biologic) agents,
flammables and corrosives.
I ~
f
I
k! i
i
(c) For purposes of this section, costs incurred by the
Fire Department or other departments of the City
shall include, but shall not be limited to, all
actual out-of-pocket expenses attributable to the
abatement or clean-up of any hazardous materials in-
cident including costs of equipment operations, costs
of materials utilized, costs of specialists, experts
or other contract labor not in the full-time employ-
ment of the City, overtime costs and any other inci-
dental costs incurred by the City of Denton as a
result of said incident. {
(d) The authority to recover costs under this section
shall not include actual fire suppression, rescue,
medical and similar services which are normally or
usually provided by the fire Department and other
City departments and are unrelated to a particular
hazardous material incident.
{
SECTION II. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the
City Dune t at the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses,
and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, or section of this ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional or invalid by any judgment or decree of a court
of competent ,jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality or invalidity w
shall not affect any other remaining phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph, or section of this ordinance, and the City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed the remaining portions
even though it had known the affected parts would be held uncon-
stitutional or invalid.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall become effective immedi-
ately upon its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
i ~
ATTEST:
'
J 1
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SEURETM
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
{ BY:
PAGE 2
I
1
i
MJA
t
I '
I
i
I~
I
1
f
J
_
low
tg# r
e S
II
i
i
E i
1
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON RETAINING THE LAWFIRM OF
HENDERSON BRYANT & WOLFE TO REPRESENT THE CITY OF DENTON IN
LITIGATION PENDING AGAINST THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Y
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
' SECTION I. That the Council of the City of Denton approves
the City Attorney's retainer of the lawfirm of Henderson Bryant &
Wolfe to represent the city in the litigation pending styled Golden
Trian_ale Joint Venture Pep Boys Mannv Moe and Jack ys City of
Denton Texas. and Jim Mattox in the United States District Court,
Eastern District of Texas, Case Number S-89-273-CA.
SECTION III That the City Council hereby ratifies and
j approves the City Attorney's retainer of the lawfirm of Henderson
Bryant & Wolfe to represent the City in litigation pending styled
' In-Re Flow Regional Medical Center. -Inc a Texas Nonprofit
Corporation a/k/a Flow Memorial Hospital, Bank of Lincolnwood vs
City of Denton in the United States District Court, Eastern
District of Texas, Case Number S-89-64-CA and Scientific Leasina.
Inc vs. City of Denton in the United States District Court,
` Eastern District of Texas, Case Number S-89-65-CA.
SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of November, 1989.
RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR
f
f ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
I
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i~ By.,
4
~ •A
i
h E
1FT-r-vr FT
i
I ~
1
i
1
r ~
i
j
I
I~
p
1
9
i
I
j4
f ~ N
2786L G~
ORDINANCE NO.
A14 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A SETTLEMENT
AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS, FOR PENDING LITIGATION BETWEEN THE CITY
OF DENTON AND BVERY JACK BOWLING, JR., ET AL; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
Ii
SECTION I. That the attached Settlement and Release of All
Claims between the City of Denton and Bvery Jack Bowling, Jr., et
al, providing for the settlement of the litigation now pending
between the parties before the 362nd Judicial District Court of
Denton County, Texas in Cause No. 88-3948-D, is approved in
accordance with its terms, and the City Manager is authorized to
execute the agreement and all other documents and make the pay-
ments and take such action as is necessary to comply with the
terms of said agreement.
A SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1989.
i
RAY sfi He ,
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
}
h ,3Y:
fh APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
i
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
i
{ BY:
4S
i
d
a'
. 1
.
~
I
i
I
JJ
it
J ~
II
I
I
1
J
1
I
i
i
1
1
aH' I Pn:
t
11 4
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Airport Leases
RECOMMENDATION:
Amend Airport Lease for Private Pad Site per Federal Aviation
Administration request.
SUMMARY:
This lease has ucrm reviewed and approved by the City Council on
October 3, 1989. Tills amendment consists of minor changes requested
by the Federal Aviation Administration.
BACKGROUND:
Resolution No. R89-069 to be amended per copy of correspondence from
the Federal Aviation Administration - Ron Staley.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
None
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RESPEC LLY SUBv+I TED-
[a r r
el
City, anager
Prepared by:
k
t
me
(Ifitle
Apprav
a e
Title
2633C/3
rv..n Yi
3
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Airport Lease Aqreement for Private Pad Site Leases
RECOMMENDATION:- It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory
Board to amend the Private Pad Site Lease Aqreement per the Federal
Aviation Administration request.
SUMMARY: This is a standard airport lease for a private pad site 1
(40 x 50) located on the south end of the Airport. Detailed
buildinq plans for the hangar and premises will be submitted to ,
the Airport Board, Airport Manaqer, and City Manaqer for final approval.
BACKGROUND:
i
N/A
r
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
This airport will not affect any other department or group.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There will be no cost to the General Fund. Each pad site
(40' x SO') at 120 per sq. ft. will increase airport revenues
by $240.00 per year.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
'r
Lloyd Harrell
City Manager
I
Prepared by:
i
Name Joe Thompson
TitleJoe
Manaqer
Approved:
Name Rick Svehla
Title eputy Citv Manaqer
2633C/P
I
I
i
! M A
Ji
1
J
city of DENTON / 215 F. McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201
T0: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
FROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager
SUBJECT: Standardized T-?iangar Lease
DATE: November 14, 1969
Mr. Ron Staley with F.A.A. office in Ft. Worth gave me a call and inquired
about the removal of the Port-A-Port T-hangar from the parking apron about
the same time that the standardized lease was put before the City Council
for approval. He asked if I had a copy that could be mailed to him, w.iich
I did. After Mr. Staley reviewed the lease he replied by memo, asking
for some changes. Please see Mr. Staley's attached memo. Because of these
changes the City Attorney will have to amend the first resolution for the
standardized lease and resubmit to the City Council for approval again.
Thanks,
Joe Thompson
I
i
I
j i
r
I` f
i
I
1
z
.
U5 Deportall
Of kwsporbrjon Southwest Region Fort Worth, Teas 76193-0000
Arkansas. Lowsiana.
"rolAvloHOn NewMe.co Oklahoma.
AdminislroHon "e,as
OCT I O N
M*. Joe Thompson
Airport Manager
Denton Municipal Airport
215 East McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr. Thompson:
We have reviewed the proposed lease for pad cites transmitted with your
letter dated October 10, 1989, and offer the following comments:
a. Article I.A., NONDISCRIMINATION. This is not the correct
paragraph. The Grant Agreement Sponsor ASSLrancea require insertion word
for cord of the enclosed paragraph.
b. Article II, LEASED PREMISES. This paragraph incorporates an
"Attachment 'A'." The drawing is not marked as such. Further, the drawing
does not sufficiently show where the sites are located on the airport. We
suggest addition of a small layout drawing, showing their relative location
on the airport.
f
c. Article IV.B. ANNUAL RENTAL ADJUSTMENTS. We have been informed by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics in Dallas that the enclosed is the correct
method for computing an increase based on consumer price index.
d. Article Y.A., USE OF PREMISES. We suggest the use of leased
aircraft be allowed.
Subject to the above, the proposed lease is otherwise satisfactory.
Thank you for the opportunity of reviewing the lease. We will appreciate
receiving a copy of the final revised lease. If you have gcestions on the
above, please contact Mr. Gary Ewing at (817) 624-5638.
Sincerely,
i
~y
Acting neger, Airports
Programming Branch
2 Enclosures
I
i
~..r~
y
I
The lessee for himself, his personal representatives,
successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration
hereof, does hereby covenant and agrees as a covenant running with the
land that: (1) no person on the grounds of race, color, or national
origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or
be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said faoilities,
(2) that in the construction of any improvements on, over, or under such
land and the furnishing of services thereon, no person on the grounds of
race, color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in,
denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination,
(3) that the lessee shall use the premises in compliance with all other
requirements imposed by or pursuant to 49 CFR Part 210 Nondiscrimination
in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation, and as
said Regulations may be amended.
i
I
i
f -
4
ti
D A3iustn.oiits to Rent. As promptly a:: practi-
cable after the end of each year after tho beginning
date of this Lease, Lessor shall compute the percentage of
change lincrease or decrease), If any, in the cost of living
during the period between the beginning date and'the date of
cach anniversary thereof during the term of this
Lease, base] upon the changes in.the Consumer Price rndex
1 for Urban t•!age Earners and clerical Workers - U.S, Average
i
(1967-100) (herein called "Consumer Price Index"), as determined
by the United States Department of Labor, Uureau of Labor
Statistics for "All Items". It In agreed that the Conswear
Price Index Munber at the commencement date of this Lease is
314.1 J°.%t;") (herein called "ease Index Number"). If the
Consumer Price Index Number for the month in which any such
` anniversary of the beginnin~ g to shall occur
leach such number Iving herein called an "Anniversary index
Ilu ber") is higher or lower than the Base Index Number, then
such Anniversary Index Number shall be divided by the Base
Index Nwmber and from the quotient thereof shall be subtractet
the integer one (1). The resulting number, multiplied by
one hundred, rhall be deawed to be the percentage of increase
or decrease in the cost of living. Such percentage of change
4 shall be multiplied by the Basic Rental and the product.
I thereof shall be added to or subtracted from the Pasic
Rental to determine the annual rental payable for the next
I ,
year period commencing on the immediately preceding
L111
4
ti
y.,
t
anniversary of the Gcginning Oatu (such ariount Lcir,g I,(c,oir,
sometimes called "Adjusted Basic Dental"). Sucli Adjuutod
Basic Rental shall be calculated in the abOVQ rl.ln14:• during
each year of the Leaue Torm. Lessor shall, within a
reasonable time after obtaining the appropriate data neccc r,ry
for computing any change in the annual rent, give Lessee
-1 notice of any change so determined. Lessee shall notify
Lessor of any claimed, error therein within thirty (30) days
i after receipt of such notice. If publication of tho Consuv-or
Price Index shall be discontinued, the parties hereto shall
thereafter accept the comparable statistics on the cost of
living for the City of San Antonio,,Texas, as they shall Le
computed and published by an agency of the United States or
by a responsible financial periodical of recogniacd authority,
then to be selected by the parties hereto. As an example,
only, of the foregoing adjustment:
i
I a. Assume Basic Mental is per acre $100.60 par
year,
b. Assume Basic Index Nuriber is 2000
c. Assume Anniversary Index Nurnber on the
anniversary date of the comrencement date is
300,
then based upon the foregoing, the Annual Basic
Rental shall be:
Anniversary index slumber 300 a.. Base Index Number 200
1.5- In •5x1004 SO=SO%
501 x 100 4 50.00
50.00 + 100.00 4 150.00 Adjusted Basic Rental.
I
' 2785E
RESOLUTION NO.
_
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CERTAIN
AIRPORT LEASES FOR PAD SITES FOR T-HANGARS AT THE DENTON MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES; REPEALING RESOLUTION 89-069;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Airport Manager has received several requests
from
corner nofvthe 1De tons Muni ipale Airportaforierection handomainte-
nance of T-hangers; and
E WHEREAS, the City Manager and Airport Advisory Board recom-
mend that the lease form attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and
j incorporated by reference herein be used as the standard lease
form for such pad site lease agreements; and
WHEREAS, the Aicport Advisory Board and the City Manager
recommend that the pad sites as reflected on the attached Exhibit
"B" be leased at twelve cents per square foot, the rental rate as
specified in the Airport Master Plan; and
{ WHEREAS, the City Council having received the recommendations
of the Airport Advisory Board and City Manager and having found
that it is in the beat interest of the City to authorize the city
Manager to execute said leases in the form and under the
conditions as contained in the attachments; and
WHEREAS, the programming branch of the Federal Aviation
Administration having reviewed said lease form and recommended
several changes thereto, which changes are acceptable to the City
Manager and the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute ease agreements, in the form as set forth in Exhibit "A",
for the11rental of the real property located and highlighted on
Exhibit 8 and at the rate of twelve cents per square foot.
CouncECTIonN t Ie'3rdd ay Resolution
October, 819899 is adoted by the
repealed City
the City Secretary shall inscribe on said Resolution 89-069 a
statement that this subsequent Resolution shall be controlling.
SECTION III. That this Resolution
imme emery upon its passage and a shell become effective
I Pproval.
Y
r
r
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of ,
1989.
KXY E , MOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER. , T CR
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA AMI DRAYOV TCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
F ~ s
4 `
i
I
i
I
PAGE 2
i
a
EXHIBIT "A"
THE STATE OF TEXAS § PAD SITE AIRPORT LEASE BETWEEN THE
COUNTY OF DENTON § CITY OF DENTON AND _
This agreement, hereinafter referred to as "Lease" is made and
executed this day of _
by and between the CITY OF DENTON, a m.unicipal~corporation ofxthe
State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "Lessor", and
hereinafter referred to as essee,r. '
1. CONDITIONS OF LEASE
A. Non-Discrimina on. The Lessee, for himself, his personal
successors in interest, and assigns, as apart of
the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a
covenant running with the land that:
I
(1) No person on the grounds of race, color, or national
origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied
the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to
discrimination in the use of said facilities.
i
j (2) In the construction of any improvements on, over, or
tinder such land and the furnishing of services thereon,
no person on the grounds of race, religion, color, sex, i
or national origin shall be excluded from participation
in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected I
to discrimination.
(3) The Lessee shall use the Premises in compliance with
all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49,
Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transpor-
tation, Subtitle A, office of the Secretary, Part 21,
Non-discrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of I
the Department of Transportation, and as said
Regulations may be amended.
In the event of breach of any of the above non-discriminatory
covenants, Lessor shall have the right to terminate the Lease and
1 to reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and
hold the same as if said Lease had never been made or issued.
B. public: Areas,
(1) Lessor reserves unto itself, its successors and
assigns, for the use and benefit of the flying public,
a right of flight for the passage of aircraft above the
surface of the Premises described herein, together with
the right to cause in said airspace such noise as may
be inherent in the operation of aircraft now known or
hereafter used, for navigation of or flight in the said
i
airspace, and for use of said airspace for landing on,
taking off from, or operating on the Airport.
(2) During time of war or national emergency, Lessor shall
have the right to lease the landing area or any part
thereof to the United States Government for military
or naval use, and, if such lease is executed, the
provisions of this instrument insofar as they are
inconsistent with the provisions of the lease to the
Government, shall be suspended.
(3) Lessor reserves the right to take any action it
considers necessary to protect the aerial approaches
of the Airport against obstruction, together with the
right to prevent Lessee from erecting, or permitting
to be erected, any building or other structure on or
adjacent to the Airport which, in the opinion of the
Lessor, would limit the usefulness or safety of the
Airport or constitute a hazard to aircraft or to
aircraft navigation.
(4) This Lease shall be subordinate to the provisions of
any existing or future agreement between Lessor and the
United States or agency thereof, relative to the
operation or maintenance of the Airport. 1
II. LEASED PREMISES
Lessor, for and in consideration of the covenants and
agreements herein contained to be kept by Lessee, does lease to
Lessee, and Lessee does hereby lease from Lessor the tract of land
! as shown in Attachment "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference, described as follows:
i
For the purposes of this Lease, the term "Premises" shall mean
the property located within the land described above.
III. TERM
The term of this Lease shall be for a period of fifteen (15)
years, commencing on the day of , 1989, and
continuing through the day of unless
earlier terminated under the provisions of the Lease.
IV. RENTALS AND PAYMENTS
Lessee covenants and agrees to pay to Lessor, as consideration
! for this Lease, payments and rentals and fees as follows:
Page 2
A. girst Year Rent. Lessee shall pay to the Lessor rent for
the use and occupancy of the Premises for the first year of this
Lease the sum of per square foot per year, for a
total of
to be paid in two (2) equal installments in
the sum of
each six (6) months, with the first payment to be made upon
execution of this Lease and the second payment due on or before
1. 19 Thereafter, payments shall be due on 1
and _ I of each year of the Lease. j
B. Annual Adjustments to Rent. For subsequent years, as
promptly as practicable after the end of each lease year, Lessor
shall compute the percentage of increase, if any, in the cost of
living during the period between the beginning date and the date
of each anniversary thereof during the term of this Lease,
based upon the changes in the consumer Price Index for Urban Wage
! Earners and Clerical Workers - U. S. Average (1967=100) (herein
called "Consumer Price Index"), as determined by the United States
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for "All Items".
It is agreed that the Consumer Price Index Number at the
commencement date of this Lease is (_t 19_)
(herein called "Base Index Number"). If the Consumer Price Index
Number for the month in which any such annual anniversary of the
beginning date shall occur (each such number being herein called
an "Anniversary Index Number") is higher than the Base Index
Number, then such Anniversary Index Number shall be divided by the
Base Index Number and from the quotient thereof shall be subtracted
the integer one (1). The resulting number, multiplied by one
hundred, shall be deemed to be the percentage of increase in the
cost of living. Such percentage of change shall be multiplied by
the Basic Rental and the product thereof shall be added to the
Basic Rental to determine the annual rental payable for the next
one year period commencing on the immediately preceding anniversary
of the beginning date (such amount being herein sometimes called
"Adjusted Basic Rental").
Such Adjusted Basic Rental shall be calculated in the above manner J
during each subsequent year of the Lease Term. Lessor shall,
within a reasonable time after obtaining the appropriate data
necessary for computing any change in the annual rent, give Lessee
notice of any change so determined. Lessee shall notify Lessor of
any claimed error therein within thirty (30) days after receipt of
such notice. If publication of the consumer Price Index shall be
discontinued, the parties hereto shall thereafter accept the
f comparable statistics on the cost of living for the City of Dallas,
} Texas, as they shall be conputed and published by an agency of the
United States or by a responsible financial periodical of
recognized authority, then to be selected by the parties hereto.
As an example, only, of the foregoing adjustment:
a. Assume Basic Rental is per acre $100.00 per year,
I
b. Assume Basic Indc.x Number is 2001
Page 3
y
I
c. Assume Anniversary Index Number on the anniversary date of
the commencement date is 300,
then,based upon the foregoing, the Annual Basic Rental shall
be:
Anniversary Index Number 300 Divided by Base Index Number 200=
1.5 - 1 - .5 x 100 - 50 = 50%
50% x 100 - 50.00
50.00 + 100.00 - 150.00 Adjusted Basic Rental.
If there is no increase in the Consumer Price Index, the rental
shall remain at the rate of the previous year.
C. Payment and Penalty. All payments made hereunder by Lessee
4 shall be made to Lessor at the offices of the Finance Department
of the Lessor of Denton, Accounts Receivable, 215 E. McKinney,
Denton, Texas 76201, unless Lessee is notified to the contrary in
writing by Lessor. All semi-annual rental payments, other than the
first rental, shall be due and payable as set forth in section A
hereof and shall be paid by Lessee without demand or notice from
Lessor.
V. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF LESSEE
A. Use of Premises. Lessee is granted the right to use the
Premises for the storage of aircraft owned or leased and operated
k by the Lessee. Lessee may not use any portion of the Premises for
any other use.
B. General Access to Premises. Subject to the reasonable
rules, regulations, or directives of Lessor, Lessee shall, in
common with others so authorized, have the nonexuiusive right and
privilege over and through the Airport property and the right of
ingress to and egress from the Premises for its employees, agents,
guests, and invitees, suppliers of materials and furnishers of
services.
C. Standards. During the Lease term, Lessee shall comply with
the following requirements and standards:
(1) Address. Lessee shall file with the Airport Manager
and keep current its mailing address, telephone
number(s) and contacts where its authorized official
can be reached in an emergency.
(2) Utilities. Taxes And Fees. Lessee shall meet all
expenses and payments in connection with the use and
occupancy of the Premises and the rights and privileges
herein granted, including the timely payments of
utilities, taxes, permit fees, license fees and
assessments lawfully levied or assessed. Lessee herein
agrees to timely pay to all lawful taxing authorities
an ad valorem pricerty tax on all improvements
constructed by the Lessee on the Premises, and to
Page 4
comply with all tax laws pertaining to the Preu'ses,
including those promulgated in the future.
(3) Rules. Regulations and Restrictions. Lessee shall
comply with all laws, codes, ordinances, rules, and
regulations, either existing or those promulgated in
the future, by the Lessor, the County of Denton, the
State of Texas, the United States of America, and the
Federal Aviation Administration, or their successors
applicable to the Premises or use thereof. Lessee's
use of the Premises shall at all times be in compliance
with and subject to any covenants, restrictions, and
conditions of record pertaining to the use and
occupancy of the Premises. 1
Lessee shall not operate or permit the operation of any
transmitter devices, electrical signal producers, or
j machinery on the Premises which could interfere with
the electronic aircraft navigation aids or devices
located on or off Airport property. Lessee shall not
be permitted to engage in any business or operation on
I the Premises which would produce obstructions to
visibility or violate height restrictions as set forth
by the Federal Aviation Administration or the Lessor. j
(4) Height Restriction And Airspace Protection, The Lessee
agrees for itself, its successors, and assigns to
restrict the height of structures, objects of natural
growth and other obstructions on the Premises to a
height as established in City of Denton ordinance 51-1,
as the same may be amended from time-to-time. The
Lessee also agrees for itself, its successors, and
assigns to prevent any use of the Premises which would
interfere with landing or taking off of aircrazt at the
Airport, or otherwise constitute an airport hazard.
Lessee hereby forfeits all claims to aviation rights
over the Premises,
(5) Haintenance. Lessee shall be responsible for all
maintenance and repair of the Premises, including
buildings, structures, grounds, pavements, and
utilities. Lessee shall be responsible for grass
cutting, collection and removal of trash and for such
other maintenance requirements as may arise, Lessee
agrees to keep the Premises, together with all
improvements, in a safe, clean and attractive condition
i at all times. Lessee shall not change the original
color or texture of the exterior walls of any
structures or improvements without the written consent
of Lessor.
(a) Painting of Buildings. During the term of this
Lease, Lessor shall have the right to require, not
more than once every five years, that the exterior
of each hangar or building located on the Premises
Page 5
be reviewed by the Airport Board for the purpose
of determining whether painting of the exteriors
of such buildings or hangars is necessary. If the
Airport Board determines painting is necessary, it
shall furnish a recommendation to this effect to
the City Council. The Council, may, upon the
Board's recommendation, require Lessee to repaint
said exteriors according to Lessor's specifications
(to specify color of paint, quality of paint,
number of applications, quality of workmanship and
the year and month in which each hangar or building
is to be painted, if needed). Lessee shall
complete the painting in accordance with such
specifications within six (6) months of receipt of
notice from Lessor. Lessee agrees to pay all costs
of the required painting. Failure of Lessee to
complete the painting required by Lessor's City
Council within the six (6) month period shall
constitute Lessee's default under this Lease.
(b) Storage Lessee shall not utilize or permit others
to utilize the Premises for the storage of wrecked
or permanently disabled aircraft, aircraft parts,
automobiles, vehicles of any type, or any other
equipment or items which would distract from the
appearance of the Premises.
(6) Quit Possession. Lessee shall quit possession of the
Premises at the end of this Lease, and deliver up the
Premises to Lessor in as good condition as existed when
possession was taken by Lessee, reasonable wear and
tear excepted.
(7) 9=,LgA1j. Lessee shall properly store, collect anJ
dispose of all chemicals and chemical residues;
properly store, confine, collect and dispose of all
paint, including paint spray in the atmosphere, and
paint products; and comply with all local, state and
federal laws and regulations governing the storage,
handling or disposal of chemicals and paints. Lessee
shall not utilize, store, dispose, or transport any
material, fluids, solids or gaseous substances on the
Premises which are considered by the Environmental
Protection Agency to be a hazard to the hsalth of the
general public end undertake any activity on the
Premises that would produce noxious odors.
I
(B) Signs. Lessee shall not place any signs on the
premises identifying Lessee.
(9) Up _of Runways and Taxiwayg. That because of the
present fifteen thousand (15,000) pound continuous use
weight bearing capacity of the taxiways of the Airport, J
Lessee shall limit all aeronautical activity including 1
landing, take-off and taxiing, to aircraft having an
Page 6
I
r
C
actual weight, including the weight l Bait until fuele Of
fifteen thousand (15,000) pounds time that the designated taxiways on the Airport have
been improved to handle aircraft of a greater weight.
Should Lessee disregard the provisions of this section, l
Lessor may im tod Lessor terminate
any damage, as 1
agrees to pay
deteru'ned by Lessor, to Airport property that results
from a %iolation of this section.
(10) Parking. The parking of motor vehicles on Airport
property by Lessee, Lessee's guests or invitees, shall
be subject to any regulations, restrictions or
_ directions imposed by Lessor. ,a
' C. Connec ion to Utilities. Lessee may connect to any exist-
ing water mains serving the Premises, in accordance with and upon
payment of any tap or connection fees, as specified by Lessor's
ordinances applicable to utility customers, provided, however,
to Lessor for
the connections mawater or sewer pro
Lessee shents not be liable
rata paym I
VI. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF LESSOR
A. flea~eful Eniovment. That on payment of rent, fees, and
performance of the covenants and agreements on the part of Lessee y
to be performed hereunder, Lessee shall peaceably hold and enjoy
the Premises and all rights and privileges herein granted.
I
B. F&eements_ Lessor shall have the right to establish
easements, at no cost to Lessee, upon the Premises for the purpose
of providing utility services to, from, or across the Airport
property or for the construction of public facilities on the
Airport. However, any such easements shall not interfere with
Lessee's use of the Premises and Leasor shall restore the property
to its original condition upon the installation of any utility
services on, in, over or under any such easement at the conclusion
of such construction. Lessee shall not have the right to levy
fees, charges, or receive any compensation for any exercised right
of easement by Lessor or Lessor's authorized agent.
VII. LEASEHOLD AND TAXIWAY IMPROVEMENTS
A jSli2< ,<,e,nenta t+v Lease@. Lessee shall construct upon the
Premises, at his own cost and expense, an aircraft storage hanger
capacityeen thousand (15,000)
1 connecting
and nuus use taxiway weight bearing meet a
pound conti
t
B. Recuired B~ildina __Plans. Lessee shall, prior to
constructing any improvements on the Premises, submit to the Lessor
for its approval, detailed construction and building plans and
specifications for the proposed improvements. The required plat
and plans shall be submitted in the form and manner specified by
A Lessor's ordinances and Lessee shall, at the time of submission,
pay all processing, permit, and approval fees applicable thereto,
Page 7
r
i
a
I
as specified by Lessorrri ordinances. Any building, hanger, or
other improvement plans and specifications submitted for initial
` construction, or any additional improvements to be made thereafter,
shall conform to the following requirementss
(1) Buildings, hangers, or structures shall conform with
and be compatible with the overall size, shape, color,
quality, design, appearance, and general plan of the
program established by the Lessors Master Plan for the
Airport, as approved by the City Council, copies which
are on file at the office of the Airport Manager and
the City Secretary.
(2) The regulations and requirements of the Lessor's
Building, Fire, Electrical, Plumbing, and other
applicable Codes and ordinances of Lessor applicable
to the improvements to be made.
(3) All buildings, including hangers, shall be designed and
constructed so as to have an anticipated life of at
least fifteen (15) years.
j (4) Any rules or regulations of any Federal or State agency
having jurisdiction thereof.
(5) Contain the estimated cost of the construction of the
improvements to be made.
(6) All hangars shall be constructed on a concrete slab.
C. AoRroval of Finns Within sixty (60) days of proper
submission of the plans, and payment of the applicable fees, Lessor
shall approve or disapprove the plans. Should Lessor fail to
approve or disapprove of the required plans within the sixty
days, the plans shall be deemed approved. Should the Lessor timely
disapprove the plans, it shall give notice to the Lessee of the
reason for the disapproval. No construction of any improvements
shall begin until and unless the plans and specifications are
approved by Lessor.
D. Airnlnne Taxiway Access. Lessee shall be responsible for
the maintenance of the taxiway access provided, and shall keep the
taxiway in good condition, free of obstructiono ana defects. The
use of the improved taxiway access shall be subject to the
reasonable rules, regulations, or directives of Lessor.
t E. B,Laht of Iesaor to v„. a I In the
event that Lessee should elect to sell his hangar situated upon the
premises at the tine Lessee has the authority to do so, Lessor
shall first be offered the right to purchase j
a value determined by having such improvementsta improvements at
appraisers, one appointed by Lessor, one appointed by Ld se three
one appointed by the two appraisers. The costs of tithe appraisand
al
shall be paid by lessor. Within sixty (60) days of the delivery
of a written appraisal report by the appraisers to Lessor, shall
Page 8
I
J
l
r
1(
1
N
i
notify Lessee in writing of its decision to purchase all or part
of the hangers or buildings to be sold. If Lessor exercises its
right to purchase, it shall make payment to Lessee of the appraised
valge of the buildings or hangers to be purchased within thirty
(10) days of the written notice.
F. RIWygJ of Bangers. in the evant that Lessee should remove
the hangar from the Premises, where such removal is authorized by
this Lease, Lessee herein agrees to comply with the following
terwss
(l) LPrior essee to commencing shall agreeronetheabestomethod the
I~ remove the building, including where to cut water
lines, electrical wire, plumbing and other fixtures or
--1 utilities, so as to cut said fixtures to allow the
' future use of these fixtures.
(2) The hangar shall be removed completely from the surface
of the concrete slab and up, with the exception of cut
Ih utility lines. All interior fixtures shall be removed
includingsinks, would ipreven walls and all other
items or fixtures t t the concrete slab
from being as free as possible from all obstructions.
(3) to Ramoval of
Lessee's designated termination dateompleted prior
(4) The hangar slab, the aircraft parking apron, the
taxiway, and all other imrovements on the Premises
on the pPremfses and shall remain
property of the Lessor without cost toaLessor.ome the of all
(5) reLessee shall be responsible for the fuse and debris from the Premises prior to vacating
the Premises.
(b) the removal iofetheshangar, including c costs involved of permits
or fees.
(7) Lessee shall be responsible for any damage caused to
any improvements on the Premises during the removal
process, and Lessee herein agrees to repair or replace,
Lessee's
the removal ~ofnsaidstructures.amaged by Lessee
during
VIII. SUBROGATION OF MORTGAGEE
Lessee shall have the right to place a first mortgage lion
upon its leasehold in an amount not to exceed eighty percent (80%)
of the coat of the capital improvements. The termsdnd conditions
of such mortgage loan shall be subject to the approval
l and Lessee shall submit copies of the loan documents, including the
E
Page 9
J
r
loan application, to Lessor. If Lessor approves the loan, Lender's
duties and rights are as follows:
(1) The Lender shall have the right, in case of default, to
assume the rights and obligations of Lessee herein and
become a substituted ',esses, with the further right to
assign the Lessee's interest to a third party, subject )co
approval of Lessor. Lender's obligations under this Lease
as substituted Lessee shall cease upon assignment to a
third party as approved by Leasor.
(2) As a condition precedent to the exercise of the right
'i granted to Lender by this paragraph, Lender shall notify
r Lessor of all action taken by it in the event payments on
such loans shall become delinquent. Lender shall also
notify Lessor, in writing, on any change in the identity
I or address of the Lender.
f All notices required by Article XI herein (Cancellation
by Lessor) to be given by Lessor to Lessee shall also be
given by Lessor to Lender at the same time and in the same
manner provided Lessor has been furnished with written
notice of Lender's interest and its address. Such notice
shall be given to the City Secretary and the Airport
Manarer. Upon receipt of such notice, Lender shall have
the same rights as Lessee to correct any default.
IX. INSURANCE
A. Lessee shall maintain continuously in effect at all times
during the term of this Lease or any extension thereof, at Lessee's
expense, the following insurance coverage:
(1) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance covering the
Premises, the Lessee, its personnel and its operations
on the Airport, for bodily injury and property damage
in the minimum amount of $250,000, combined single
limits on a per occurrence basis.
(2) Fire and extended coverage for replacement value for
all facilities used by the IAssee either as a part of
this Lease or erected by the Lessee subsequent to the
execution of this Lease.
0. All policies shall be issued by a company authorized to do
business in the State of Texas, be approved by the Lessor, copies
of which shall be provided to Lessor. The policies shall name the
Lessor as an Additional named insured and shall provide for a
minimum of thirty (30) days written notice to the Lessor prior to
the effective date of any cancellation or lapse of such policies.
C. During the term of this Lease, and not more often than once
every five (5) years, Lessor herein reserves the right to adjust
or increase the liability insurance amounts required of the Lessee,
t and to require any additional rider, provisions, or certificates
Page 10
I
I
I
1
h
,
I ~
of insurance, and Lessee hereby agrees to provide any such
insurance requirements as may be required by Lessor; provided
however, that any requirements shall be commensurate with insurance
requirements at other public use airports similar to the Airport
in size and in scope of aviation activities, located in the
h southwestern region of the United States. For the purpose of this
Lease, the Southwestern region of the United States shall be the
states classified as the Southwestern region by the Federal
Aviation Administration.
D. Lessee herein agrees to comply with all increased or
adjusted insurance requirements that may be required by the Lessor
throughout the original or extended ten. of this Lease, including
types of insurance and monetary amounts or limits of insurance, and
to comply with said insurance requirements within sixty (60) days
following receipt of a notice in writing from Lessor stating the
increased or adjusted insurance requiroments. Lezdve shall have
the right to maintain in force types of insurance and amount,i of
insurance which exceed Lessor's minimum insurance requirements.
X. INDEMNITY
A. Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Lessor nrid its
agents, employees, and representatives from and against all lia-
bility for any and all claims, suits, demands, or actions arising
from or based upon intentional or negligent acts or omissions on
the part of Lessee, its agents, representatives, employees, mem-
bers, patrons, visitorc, contractors and subcontractors, or
sublessees, if any, which may arise out of or result from Lessee's
occupancy or use of the Premises or activities conducted in
connection with or incidental to this Lease.
B. This Indemnity Provision also extends to any claim or
liability for harm, injury, or any damaging events which are
directly or indirectly attributable to premise defects or
conditions
Promises, anymandnallesuch defects which bemay ing hereafter expressly arise p
waived
the by
Lessee. Lessee understands and agrees that this Indemnity
Provision shall apply to any and all claims, suits, demands, or
actions based upon or arising from any such claim asserted by or
on behalf of Lessee or any of its members, patrons, visitors,
agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors, or sublessees,
if any.
C. Lessee agrees to give the Lessor prompt and timely notice
of any such claim made or suit instituted which in any way,
directly indirectly, the°Lessor.}tlLessee further 9 affects or
that mthis
i affect the e Lessee )
Indemnity Provisior: shall be consiuered as an additional remedy to
Lessor and not an exclusive remedy.
XI. CANCELLATION BY LESSOR
All the terms, restrictions, covenants, and conditions
pertaining to the use and occupancy of the Premises are conditions
Page 11 I
1
m
of this Lease and the failure of the Lessee to comply with any of
the terms, conditions, restrictions, covenants, and conditions
shall be considered a default of this Lease, and upon default, the
Lessor shall have the right to invoke any one or all of the
following remedies.
A. In the event that Lessee fails to comply with any of the
terms, conditions, restrictions and covenants contained in this
Lease, such failure shall constitute an event of default under the
Lease, and Lessor shall give Lessee notice of said breach, and
request Lessee to cure or correct the same. Should Lessee fail to
correct said violation(s) or breach within thirty (30) days
following receipt of said notice, then Lessor shall havo the right
to terminate this Lease. Should this Lease be terminated by Lessor
for failure of Lessee to correct said breach or violation within
tho thirty (30) day cure time, Lessee shall forfeit all rights to
all improvements on the Premises and all improvements on the
Premises shall become the property of the Lessor.
B. In addition to termination of this Lease for the breach of
terms and conditions herein, the Lessor shall have the right to
I' terminate this Lease for the following reasons:
(1) In the event that Lessee shall file a voluntary
petition in bankruptcy or proceedings in bankruptcy
shall be instituted against Lessee and Lessee
thereafter is adjudicated bankrupt pursuant to such
proceedings, or any court shall take jurisdiction of
Lessee anJ its assets pursuant to proceedings brought
I~ under the provisions of any federal reorganization act=
or if a receiver shall take jurisdiction of Lessee and
t its assets pursuant to proceedings brought under the
provisions of any federal reorganization acts or if a
receiver for Lessee's assets is appointed.
(2) In the event that Lessee should make an assignment of
this Lease, for any reason, without the approval of and
written consent from Lessor.
C. Upon termination or cancellation of this Lease and provided
all monies due Lessor have been paid, Lessee shall have the right
to remove its personal property, provided such removal does not
cause damage to any part of the hangar, structure or improvements.
Lessee shall remove all personal property from the Premises within
f ten (10) days after the termination. If Lessee fails to remove
its personal property as agreed, Lessor may elect to retain
possession of such property or may sell the same and keep the
proceeds, or may have such property removed at the expense of
Lessee.
j Where, upon termination of the Lease, the fixed improvements
become the property of Lessor as provided herein, Losses shall
repair, at its own expense, any damage to the fixed improvements,
resulting from the removal of personal property and shall leave
Page 12
I
T-R
the Premises in a neat and clean condition with all other
improvements in place.
E. Failure of Lessor to declare this Lease terminated upon the
default of Lessee for any of the reasons set out shall not operate 1
to bar, destroy, or waive the right of Lessor to cancel this Lease !I
by reason of any subsequent violation of the terms hereof. The
acceptance of rentals and fees by Lessor for any period or periods
after a default of any of the terms, covenants, and conditions
herein contained to be performed, kept, and observed by Lessee
shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights on the part of the
Lessor to cancel this Lease for failure by Lessee to so perform,
keep or observe any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof 1
to be performed, kept and observed.
XII. CANCELLATION BY LESSEE
j
Lessee may cancel this Lease, in whole or part, and terminate
all or any of its obligations hereunder at any time, by thirty (30)
days written notice, upon or after t1.A happening of any one of the
following events:
(1) issuance by any court of preventing or restraining the
use of said Airport or any part thereof for Airport
purposest
It ~
(2) the breach by Lessor of any of the covenants or agreements
j contained herein and the failure of Lessor to remedy such
breach for a period of ninety (90) days after receipt of
a written notice of the existence of such breach;
(3) the inability of Lessee to use the Premises and facilities
continuing for a longer period than ninety (90) days due
to any law or any order, rule, or regulation of any
appropriate governmental authority having jurisdiction
over the operations of Lessor or due to war, earthquake
or other casualtyt or
(4) the assumption or recapture by the United States Govern-
ment or any authorized agency thereof of the Premises for
the maintenance and operation of said Airport and
facilities or any substantial part or parts thereof.
Upon the happening of any of the four events listed in the
preceding paragraph, such that the Promises cannot be used for
authorized purposes, then Lessee may cancel this Lease as afore-
said, or may elect to continue this Lease under its terms.
XIII. OPTION
Lessee shall have a first option to lease the premises for an
additional term at the end of this Lease by giving the Lessor
notice, in writing, not later than six (6) months before the end
of the fifteen (15) year term. Should Lessee choose to exercise
such option, he shall have the right to sign a new lease for five
Page 13
i
y
r
(5) years for the Premises at the then current land rental rates
established by Lessor.
i XIV. MISCELLANLOUS PROVISIONS
A. Subletting or Asgj„nq ment. The Lessee shall not rent, or
sublease the Premises or assign this Lease without first obtaining
the written consent of Lessor. If approved by Lessor any sublessee
or assignee shall be subject to the same conditions, obligations
and terms as set forth herein.
B. Lease Binding on Successors and Assigns. All covenants,
agreements, provisions and conditions of this Lease shall be
_ binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective parties
r'1 hereto and their legal representatives, successors or assigns. No
modification of this Lease shall be binding upon either party
unless written and signed by both parties.
C. Severability. If any provision hereof shall be finally
declared void ror illegal by any court or administrative agency
having jurisdiction, the entire Lease shall not be void; but the
remaining provisions shall continue in effoct as nearly as possible
in accordance with the original intent of the parties.
D. Notice. Any notice given by one party to the other in
connection with this Lease shall be in writing and shall be sent
by registered mail, return receipt requested, with postage and
registration fees prepaid, as follows:
If to Lessor, addressed to: If to Lessee, addressed to:
City Manager
City of Denton _
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Notices shall be deemed to have been received on the date of
receipt as shown on the return receipt.
G. Headinas. The headings used in this Lease are intended
for convenience of reference only and do not define or limit the
scope or meaning of any provision of this Lease.
H. Governina Law. This Lease is to be construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Texas.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease as
of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, LESSOR
BY:
LLOYD HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
Page 14
v low
a
S
`I
1
I
1 "
I
I
ATTESTS
I
JENNIFER WALTERS# CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS 1
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BYt
LESSEE
BY:
TITLES 1
1
ds\WP50\PADSITE.1
E ~
E ~
E ~
Page 15
I ~
1
~I
P
S
a
{
'1, A
+1~` ~ll'Y Fib Ire.
2195L f~ ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CERTAIN
AIRPORT LEASES FOR PAD SITES FOR T-HANGARS AT THE DENTON MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Airport Manager has received several requests I
from individuals desirous of leasing pad sites at the southeast
corner of the Denton Municipal Airport for erection and mainte-
nance of T-hangars; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager and Airport Advisory Board recom-
mend that the lease form attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and
incorporated by reference herein be used as the standatd lease
form for such pad site lease agreements; and
WHEREAS, the Airpott Advisory Board and the City Manager
recommend that the pad sites as reflected on the attached Exhibit
"B" be leased at twelve cents per square foot, the rental rate as
specified in the Airport Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council having received the recommendations
of the Airport Advisory Board and City Manager and having found
that it is in the best interest of the City to authorize the city
Managger to execute said leases in the form and under the
j conditions as contained in the attacheents; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D£NTON, TEXAS HEREBY RESOLVES:
J
i
SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute ease agreements, in the form as set forth in Exhibit "A "o
for the rental of the real property located and highlighted on
Exhibit "B" and at the rate of twelve cents per square foot.
SECTION Ii. That this resolution shall become effective
imme ate y upon its passage and approval. J
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _d_ day of nCi.+/aW ,
1989.
OASTfF.;~Z
E A EST:
I
NARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
j DEBRA DAMI DRAY ITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: _
I
1
I
,i ~
-Flow
f 4
N 88.36' 104. W 16176' $
0
N 01023'00" E 8170 43' VARIABLE wtarr♦ tlxtar,r
. ORA
ADUE N 01123'50' E "711.37' _ _ ° tHA
°I 81- 160.0' io. 1, ~2it.77' , 1.3 160.0'S
A &
4OP4 Ce111 iu ^ IS F~ Iu.G pq 09 3s'21''w _ M
543. !'b ~P
N
In~• 211.37' IL...__.o IJ I~
M (p~
Of ~ I _~J _ e 1C0' tOUE • ~ L~ 7 p ' , '
lao.oo'Irv 8 kk al':3'ao• ~•e ~t o' ~ ~ o ~ ~ ' ~g
yI ,
t iW• I I' ~ ~ Ibl I
y ~vt Vllpt w + I I
y r ASS (o
LA I
im r*yg 8 m I~ `da. y~N
to 9 10
I a!° o
a 0 No 0 o Iro % ° 235.00' b I
ci • I• IS -----f
31 ~o 0I o 60' ADUE
• 0 0 0 8 G3~QocS~°
s:oo'Z.. i
M
M, I . t6 fi
6 `130`00'y100_0 _~r 316.31_ p' 160.00' 303.69' _ 14,30. y a.
pppppp I all 3' So' E r 1160.26 _ ' ~
go, AM 5 O1' 23' S0' 1! 1465.47' Q
r v
4 N ~ i0 H
r M M
f ~ ~ _ rr ~ ~.rrr
FOUND FIEW S 00037'01" W 1447.619 FpUNO RESAA t
r law S 12.38' 28' £ 85o24'
E
EXHIBIT "B"
1
i
i
i
EXHIBIT "A"
THE STATE OF TEXAS I PAD SITE AIRPORT LEASE BETWEEN THE
COUNTY OF DENTON 4 CITY OF DENTON AND
This agreement, hereinafter referred to as "Lease" is made and
executEd this day of , 19_, at Denton, Texas,
by and between the CITY OF DENTON, a municipal corporation of the
state of Texas, hereinafter referred to as "Lessor", and
hereinafter referred to as "Lessee". 11
r I. CONDITIONS OF LEASE
A. Non-Discrimination. The Lessee, for himself, his personal
representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of
the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a
covenant running with the land that:
i (1) In the construction of any improvements on, over, or
under such land and the furnishing of services thereon,
no person on the grounds of race, religion, color, sex,
or national origin shall be oxcluded from participation
in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected
to discrimination.
j ~
i` (2) The Lessee, shall use the Premises in compliance with
all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49,
Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transpor-
tation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21,
Non-discrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of
the Department of Transportation-Effectual of Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said
Regulations may be amended.
In the event of breach of any of the above non-discriminatory
covenants, Lessor shall have the right to terminate the Lease and
to reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and
hold the same as if said Lease had never been made or issued.
B. Public Areas.
(1) Lessor reserves unto itself, its successors and
assigns, for the use and benefit of the flying public,
a right of flight for the passage of aircraft above the
surface of the Premises described herein, together with
j the right to cause in said airspace such noise as may
be inherent in the operation of aircraft now known or
hereafter used, for navigation of or flight in the said
airspace, and for use of said airspace for landing on,
taking off from, or operating on the Airport.
I
s
r
g
(2) During time of war or national emergency, Lessor shall
have the right to lease the landing area or any part
thereof to the United States Government for military
or naval use, and, if such lease is executed, the
provisions of this instrument insofar as they are
inconsistent with the provisions of the lease to the
Government, shall be suspended.
(3) considers nserves ecessary eto right to protect the aerial approaches
con
of the Airport against obstruction, together with the
right to prevent Lessee from erecting, or permitting
to be erected, any building or other structure on or
adjacent to the Airport which, in the opinion of the
Lessor, would limit the usefulness or safety of the
Airport or constitute a hazard to aircraft or to {
aircraft navigation.
(4) This Lease shall be subordinate to the provisions of
any existing or future agreement between Lessor and the
United States or agency thereof, relative to the
operation or maintenance of the Airport.
1 II. LEASED PREMISES
Lessor, for and in consideration of the covenants and
agreements
L tract of land
essee, and herein does hereby lease from Lessorethed
as shown in Attachment "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference, described as follows:
i
For the purposes of this Lease, the term "Premises" shall mean
the property located within the land described above.
III. TERM
The term of this Lease shall be for a period. of fifteen (15)
years, commencing on the day of , 1989, and
continuing through the day of , , unless
earlier terminated under the provisions of the Lease.
IV. RENTALS AND PAYMENTS
1 Lessee covenants and agrees to pay to Lessor, as consideration
1 for this Lease, payments and rentals and fees as follows:
I
j A. First Year Rent. Lessee shall pay to the Lessor rent for
1 the use and occupancy of the Premises for the first year of this
Lease the sum of per square foot par year, for a
II Page 2
t
i
r
p ~ p
total of
the sum of + to be paid in two (2) equal installments in
each six (6) months, with the first
execution of this Lease and the second payment to be mapon
April 1, 1990. Thereafter, payments shallabeeduedon October I and
April 1 of each year of the Lease.
B.
Annual Rental
Adis ments, For subsequent years,, the
yearly rental shall be based on the All Urban Consumer P
(CPI-U) for the Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas rice Index
Metropolitan
Statistical Area, as compiled by , Standard Bureau the U.S. Department of Labor,
The rental for Years tsubsequ nting 1the 982lt 100 as the base period. nitia shall be computed by dividing the sum of g--year--,_oP, thi the is Lea amoun
se,
of rent for the init
t
ial year of the Lease, by the index number for
which is the rst of the Iar of
the Lease, tmultiplying thatfamountoby the indexnnumberyof the
last published month immediately preceding the initial month of
each subsequent year of the Lease.
C. Paymen and Pen Payments made hereunder b
by Lessee
shall be made to Lesson at•the offices of the Finance Department
of the Lessor of Denton, Accounts Receisvable, 215 E. Mpartmey,
I writing by xLessor.01Allnsemi-annual rental paced t the contrary in
first rental, shall be due and payable asseteforth ineSe tionhA than
hereof and shall be paid by Lessee without demand or notice from
Lessor.
V. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF LESSEE
i
A. Use of Premisea, Lessee is granted the right to use tai
Premises for the storage of aircraft owned and operated by the
Lessee. Lessee may not use any portion of the Premises for any
other use.
i
D, Genera LAcsess to Premises,
rules, regulations, or directives of Subject to the reasonable
Lessee shall,
common with others so authorized, have then nonexc
lusive right and
privilege over and through the Airport and the ht of
ingress to and egress from the Premises for its amp oyees,ragents,
guests, and invitees, suppliers of materials and furnishers of
setvices.
C. filAndar". During the Lease term, Lessee shall comply with
the following requirements and standards:
(1) Address• Lessee shall file with the Airport Manager
number(s) andre ntactss where _it authorized tofficial
can be reached in an emergency,
~ (2) SLtilities TeXAa a„a
j expenses and payments in connectionewi hlthemuse and
occupancy of the Premises and the rights and privileges
Page 3
herein granted, including the timely payments of
utilities, taxes, permit fees, license fees and
assessments lawfully levied or assessed. Lessee herein
agrees to timely pay to all lawful taxing authorities
an ad valorem property tax on all improvements
constructed by the Lessee on the Premises, and to
comply with all tax laws pertaining to the Premises,
including those promulgated in the future.
(3) Rules. Rewlation3and Restrictions. Lessee shall
comply with all laws, codes, ordinances, rules, and
regulations, either existing or those promulgated in
the future, by the Lessor, the County of Denton, the
state of Texas, the United States of America, and the
Federal Aviation Administration, or their successors ,
applicable to the Premises or use thereof. Lessee's
use of the Premises shall at all times be in compliance
with and subject to any covenants, restrictions, and
conditions of record pertaining to the use and
occupancy of the Premises.
Lessee shall not operate or permit the operation of any
transmitter devices, electrical signal producers, or
machinery on the Premises which could interfere with
E the electronic aircraft navigation aide or devices
located on or off Airport property. Lessee shall not
be permitted to engage in any business or operation on
the Premises which would produce obstructions to
! visibility or violate height restrictions as set forth
by the Federal Aviation Administration or the Lessor.
(4) Height Restriction And Airspace Protection. The Lessee
agrees for itself, its successors, and assigns to
restrict the height of structures, objects of natural
growth and other obstructions on the Premises to a
height as established in City of Denton Ordinance 81-1,
as the same may be amended from time-to-time. The
Lessee also agrees for itself, its successors, and
assigns to prevent any use of the Premises which would
interfere with landing or taking off of aircraft at the
Airport, or otherwise constitute an airport hazard.
Lessee hereby forfeits all claims to aviation rights
over the Premises.
I
(5) Maintenance. Lessee shall be responsible for all
maintenance and repair of the Premises, including
buildings, structures, grounds, pavements, and
utilities. Lessee shall be responsible for grass
cutting, collection and removal of trash and for such
other maintenance requirements as may arise. Lessee
agrees to keep the Premises, tor'other with all
improvements, in a safe, clean and attractive condition
at all times. Lessee shall not change the original
color or texture of the exterior walls of any
Page 4 1
J
structures or improvements without the written consent
of Lessor.
(a) Painting of Buildings. During the term of this
Lease, Lessor shall have the right to require, not
more than once every five years, that the exterior
of each hangar or building located on the Premises
be reviewed by the Airport Board for the purpose
of determining whether painting of the exteriors
of such buildings or hangars is necessary. If the
Airport Board determines painting is necessary, it
shall furnish a recommendation to this effect to
the City Council. The Council, may, upon the
Board's recommendation, require Lessee to repaint ,
said exteriors according to Lessor's specifications
(to specify color of paint, quality of paint,
number of applications, quality of workmanship and
the year and month in which each hangar or building
is to be painted, if needed). Lessee shall
complete the painting in accordance with such
specifications within six (6) months of receipt of
notice from Lessor. Lessee agrees to pay all costs
of the required painting. Failure of Lessee to
complete the painting required by Lessor's City
council within the six (6) month period shall
constitute Lessee's default under this Lease.
(b) Storage. Lessee shall not utilize or permit others
to utilize the Premises for the storage of wrecked
or permanently automobiles, vehicles e of i any type, or any other
equipment or items which would distract from the
appearance of the Premises.
(6) Quit Possession. Lessee shall quit possession of the
Premises at the end of this Lease, and deliver up the
Premises to Lessor in as good condition as existed when
possession was taken by Lessee, reasonable wear and
tear excepted.
(7) Chemicals. Lessee shall properly store, collect and
dispose of all chemicals and chemical residues;
properly store, confine, collect and dispose of all
paint, including paint spray in the atmosphere, and
paint products; and comply with all local, state and
federal laws and regulations governing the storage,
handling or disposal of chemicals and paints. Lessee
I shall not utilize, store, dispose, or transport any
material, fluids, solids or gaseous substances on the
Premises which are considered by the Environmental
Protection Agency to be a hazard to the health of the
general public and undertake any activity on the
Premises that would produce noxious odors.
Page 5
,
f ~
k
(8) Signs. Lessee shall not place any signs on the
premises identifying Lessee.
(9) Use of Runways and Taxiwa- . That because of the
present fifteen thousand (15,000) pound continuous use
weight bearing capacity of the taxiways of the Airport,
Lessee shall limit all aeronautical activity including
landing, take-off and taxiing, to aircraft having an
actual weight, including the weight of its fuel, of
fifteen thousand (15,000) pounds or less, until such
time that the designated taxiways on the Airport have
been improved to handle aircraft of a greater weight.
Should Lessee disregard the provisions of this section,
Lessor may immediately terminate this Lease. Lessee
agrees to pay to Lessor upon demand for any damage, as
determined by Lessor, to Airport property that results
- from a violation of this section.
(10) Parkins. The parking of motor vehicles on Airport
property by Lessee, Lessee's guests or invitees, shall
be subject to any regulations, restrictions or
directions imposed by Lessor.
I
C. Connection to Utilities. Lessee may connect to any exist-
ing water mains serving the Premises, in accordance with and upon
f payment of any tap or connection feep, as specified by Lessor's
ordinances applicable to utility customers, provided, however,
Lessee shall not be liable to Lessor for any water or sewer pro
rata payments as a result of the connections made.
VI. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF LESSOR
i
A. Peaceful Enjoyment. That on payment of rent, fees, and
performance of the covenants and agreements on the part of Lessee
to be performed hereunder, Lessee shall peaceably hold and enjoy
the Premises and all rights and privileges herein granted.
B. Easements. Lessor shall have the right to establish
easements, at no cost to Lessee, upon the Premises for the purpose
of providing utility services to, from, or across the Airport
property or for the construction of public facilities on the
Airport. However, any such easements shall not interfere with
Lessee's use of the Premises and Lessor shall restore the property
to its original condition upon the installation of any Aility
services on, in, over or under any such easement at the conclusion
of such construction. Lessee shall not have the right to levy
fees, charges, or receive any compensation for any exercised right
of easement by Lessor or Lessor's authorized agent.
VII. LEASEHOLD AND TAXIWAY IMPROVEMENTS
A.rovements~y Lessee. Lessee shall construct upon the
Premises, at his own cost and expense, an aircraft storage hanger
and connecting taxiway which shall meet a fifteen thousand (15,000)
pound continuous use weight bearing capacity.
Page 6
J
J
B. Required Building Plans. Lessee shall, prior to
constructing any improvements on the Premises, submit to the Lessor
for its approval, detailed construction and building plans and
specifications for the proposed improvements. The required plat
and plans shall be submitted in the form and manner specified by
Lessor's ordinances and Lessee shall, at the time of submission,
pay all processing, permit, and approval fees applicable thereto,
as specified by Lessor's ordinances. Any building, hanger, or
other improvement plans and specifications submitted for initial
construction, or any additional improvements to be made thereafter,
shall conform to the following requirements:
(1) Buildings, hangers, or structures shall conform with
and be compatible with the overall size, shape, color,
quality, design, appearance, and general plan of the
program established by the Lessor's Master Plan for the
Airport, as approved by the City Council, copies which
are on file at the office of the Airport Manager and
the City Secretary.
(2) The regulations and requirements of the Lessor's
Building, Fire, Electrical, Plumbing, and other
applicable codes and ordinances of Lessor applicable
to the improvements to be made.
i (9) All buildings, including hangers, shall be designed and
constructed so as to have an anticipated life of at
least fifteen (15) years.
(4) Any rules or regulations of any Federal or State agency
having jurisdiction thereof.
i
(5) Contain the estimated cost of the construction of the
improvements to be made.
(6) All hangars shall be constructed on a concrete slab.
C, Approval of Plans. Within sixty (60) days of proper
submission of the plans, and payment of the applicable fees, lessor
shall approve or disapprove the plans. Should Lessor fail to
approve or disapprove of the required plans within the sixty (60)
days, the plans shall be deemed approved. Should the Lessor timely
disapprove the plans, it shall give notice to the Lessee of the
reason for the disapproval. No construction of any improvements
shall begin until and unless the plans and specifications are
approved by Lessor.
i D. Airplane Taxiway Access. Lessee shall be responsible for
the maintenance of the taxiway access provided, and shall keep the
taxiway in good condition, free of obstructions and defects. The
use of the improved taxiway access shall be subject to the
reasonable rules, regulations, or directives of Lessor.
E. Right of Lessor to Purchase Hangar or Building. In the
i event that Lessee should elect to sell his hangar situated upon the
Page 7
i
E
I
J
t
at the time Lessee has the authority to do so, Lessor
Premises
shall first be offered the right to purchase the improvements a
a value determined by having such improvements appraise bee,hree
appraisers, one appointed by Lessor, one appointed by d and
one appointed by the two appraisers. The costs of the appraisal
shall be paid by Lessor. Within sixty (60) days
tofLthe delivery
of a written appraisal report by the appraisers
notify Lessee in writing of its decision to purchase all or part sor
ses its
exerci
of the hangers or buildings to be so nt•tcifeLoee of the appraised
right to purchase, it shall make paym
value of the buildings hangers to be --.:chased within thirty
days of the written F. Removal of Hanaars. In the event that Lessee should remove
the hangar from the Premises, where such removal is the authorized by
this Lease, Lessee herein agrees to comply with following
r~ terms:
j (1) Prior to commencing the hangar removal process, the
I Lessee and Lessor shall agree on the best method to
remove the building, including where to cut water
lines, electrical wire, plumbing and other fixtures or
utilities, so as to cut said fixtures to allow the
future use of these fixtures. from (2) The hangar shall be removed c with the ex eption orface
of the concrete slab and up,
utility lines. All interior fixtures shall be removed
including sinks, commodes, dividing walls and all other
items or fixtures that would prevent the concrete slab
from being as free as possible from all obstructions.
I
(1) Removal of hangars shall begin and be completO prior
to Lessee's designated termination date.
(4) The hangar slab, the aircraft parking apron, the
taxiway, and all other improvements on the Premises
shall remain on the Premises and shall become the
property of the Lessor without cost to Lessor. of all
(5) reLessee shall be responsible for the fuse and debris from the Premises prior to vacating
the Premises.
costs involved
of permits
(a) the Lessee costs
I
or fees.
' (7) Lessee shall be responsible for any damage caused to
any improvements on the Premises during the removal
process, and Lessee herein provements damaged by Lessee
at Lessee's expense, any any imp ~
during the removal of said structures.
I
Page 8
j
1
VIII. SUBROGATION OF MORTGAGEE
Lessee shall have the right to place a first mortgage lien
upon its leasehold in an amount not to exceed eighty percent (801)
of the cost of the capital improvements. The terms and conditions
of such mortgage loan shall be subject to the approval of Lessor
and Lessee shall submit copies of the loan documents, including the
loan application, to Lessor. If Lessor approves the loan, Lender's
duties and rights are as follows:
(1) The Lender shall have the right, in case of default, to
assume the rights and obligations of Lessee herein and
become a substituted Lessee, with the further right to
assign the Lessee's interest to a third party, subject to
approval of Lessor. Lender's obligations under this Lease
as substituted Lessee shall cease upon assignment to a
1 third party as approved by Lessor.
1 (2) As a condition precedent to the exercise of the right
granted to Lender by this paragraph, Lender shall notify
Lessor of all action taken by it in the event payments on
such loans shall become delinquent. Lender shall also
1 notify Lessor, in writing, on any change in the identity
h or address of the Lender.
i
(3) All notices required by Article %I herein (Cancellation
by Lessor) to be given by Lessor to Lessee shall also be
given by Lessor to Lender at the same time and in the same
manner provided Lessor has been furnished with written
` notice of Lender's interest and its address. Such notice
shall be given to the city Secretary and the Airport
Manager. Upon receipt of such notice, Lender shall have
the some rights as Lessee to correct any default.
IX. INSURANCE
A. Lessee shall maintain continuously in effect at all times
during the term of this Lease or any extension thereof, at Lessee's
expense, the following insurance coverage: I
-I (1) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance covering the
Premises, the Lessee, its personnel and its operations
on the Airport, for bodily injury and property damage
in the minimum amount of $250,0000 combined single
limits on a per occurrence basis.
(2) Fire and extended coverage for replacement value for
all facilities used by the Lessee either as a part of
{ this Lease or erected by the Lessee subsequent to the
execution of this Lease.
B. All policies shall be issued by a company authorized to do
business in the State of Texas, be approved by the Lessor, copies
of which shall be provided to Lessor. The policies shall name the
Lessor as an additional named insured and shall provide for a
Page 9 i
I
t
t
minimum of thirty (30) days written notice to the Lessor prior to
the effective date of any cancellation or lapse of cuch policies,
C. During the term of this Lease, and not more often than once
every five (5) years, Lessor herein reserves the right to adjust
or increase the liability insurance amounts required of the Lessee,
and to require any additional rider, provisions, or certificates
of insurance, and Lessee hereby agrees to provide any such
insurance requirements as may be required by Lessor; provided
however, that any requirements shall be commensurate with insuranck
requirements at other public use airports similar to the Airport
in size and in scope of aviation activities, located in the
southwestern region of the United States. For the purpose of this
Lease, the Southwestern region of the United States shall be the
states classified as the Southwestern region by the Federal
Aviation Administration.
D. Lessee herein agrees to comply with all increased or
adjusted insurance requirements that may be required by the Lessor
throughout the original or extended term of this Lease, including
types of insurance and monetary amounts or limits of insurance, and
to comply with said insurance requirements within sixty (60) days
following receipt of a notice in writing from Lessor stating the
increased or adjusted insurance requirements. Lessee shall have
the right to maintain in force types of insurance and amounts of
insurance which exceed Lessor's minimum insurance requirements.
I
X. INDEMNITY
i
A. Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Lessor and its
agents, employees, and representatives from and against all lia-
bility for any and all claims, suits, demands, or actions arising
from or based upon intentional or negligent acts or omissions on
the part of Lessoe, its agents, representatives, employees, mem-
bers, patrons, visitora, contractors and subcontractors, or
sublessees, if any, which may arise out of or result from Lessee's
occupancy or use of the Premises or activities conducted in
connection with or incidental to this Lease.
8. This Indemnity Provision also extends to any claim or
liability for harm, injury, or any damaging events which are
directly or indirectly attributable to premise defects or
conditions which may now exist or which may hereafter arise upon
the Premises, any and all auch defects being expressly waived by
Lessee. Lessee understands and agrees that this Indemnity
Provision shall apply to any and all claims, suits, demands, or
actions based upon or arising from any such claim asserted by or
on behalf of Lessee or any of its members, patrons, visitors,
3 agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors, or sublessees,
if any.
C. Lessee agrees to give the Lessor prompt and timely notice
of any such claim made or suit instituted which in any way,
directly the Lessee o t the Lessor. contingently Lesss8et further e agaffeol,.s or rees that might
affect is
page 10
i
r
f.
Indemnity Provision shall be considered as an additional remedy to
Lessor and not an exclusive remedy.
XI. CANCELLATION BY LESSOR
All the terms, restrictions, covenants, and conditions
pertaining to the use and occupancy of the Premises are conditions
of this Lease and the failure of the Lessee to comply with any of
the terms, conditions, restrictions, covenants, and conditions
shall be considered a default of this teasel and upon default, the
Lessor shall have the right to invoke any one or all of the
following remedies.
i
A. In the P-ent that Lessee fails to comply with any of the
terms, conditions, restrictions and covenants contained in this
Lease, such failure shall constitute an event of default under the
Lease, and Lessor shall give Lessee notice of sari breach, and
f request Lessee to cure or correct the same. Should Lessee fail to
correct said violation(s) or breach within thirty (30) days
following receipt of said notice, then Lessor shall have the right
to terminate this Lease. should this Lease be terninated by Lessor
for failure of Lessee to correct said breach or violation within
the thirty (30) day cure time, Lessee shall forfeit all rights to
all improvements on the Premises and all improvements on the
Premises shall become the property of the Lessor.
B. In addition to termination of'this Leaso for the breach of
terms and conditions herein, the Lessor shall have the right to
terminate this Lease for the following reasonss
(1) In the event that Lessee shall file a voluntary
petition in bankruptcy or proceedings in bankruptcy
shall be instituted against Lessee and Lessee
thereafter is adjudicated bankrupt pursuant to such
proceedings, or any court shall take juriadiction of
Lessee and its assets pursuant to proceedings brought
under the provisions of any federal reorganization acts
or if a receiver shall take jurisdiction of Lessee and
its assets pursuant to proceedings brought under the
provisions of any federal reorganization act; or if a
receiver for Lessee's assets is appointed.
(2) in the event that Lessee should make an assignment of
this Lease, for any reason, without the approval of and
written consent from Lessor.
1 C. Upon termination or cancellation of this Lease and provided
f 1 all monies due Lessor have been paid, Lessee shall have the right
to remove its personal property, provided such removal does not
cause damage to any part of the hangar, structure or improvements.
Lessee shall remove all personal property from the Premises within
to remove
as termination.
ten (10)
Lessor may s elect fails to retain
its personal s prafter operty the
possession of such property or may sell the same and keep the
Page 11
h
r r
t
r
! 1 a.
proceeds, or may have such property removed at the expense of
Lessee.
Where, upon termination of the Lease, the fixed improvements
become the property of Lessor as provided herein, Lessee shall
repair, at its own expense, any damage to the fixed improvements,
resulting from the removal of personal property and shall leave
tho Premises in a neat and clean condition with all other
improvements in place.
E. Failure of Lessor to declare this Lease terminated upon the
default of Lessee for any of the reasons set out shall not operate
to bar, destroy, or waive the right of Lessor to cancel this Lease
by reason of any subsequent violation of the terms hereof. The
acceptance of rentals and fees by Lessor for any period or periods
after a default tf any of the terms, covenants, and conditions
herein contained to be performed, kept, and observed by Lessee
shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights on the part of the
Lessor to cancel this Lease for failure by Lessee to so perform,
i keep or observe any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof
to be performed, kept and observed.
XII. CANCELLATION BY LESSEE
Lessee may cancel this Lease, in whole or part, and terminate
all or any of its obligations hereunder at any time, by thirty (30)
days written notice, upon or after the happening of any one of the
following events:
(1) issuance by any court of preventing or restraining the
use of said Airport or any part thereof for Airport
purposest
(2) the breach by Lessor of any of the covenants or agreements
contained herein and the failure of Lessor to remedy such
breach for a period of ninety (90) days after receipt of
a written notice of the existence of such breachi
(3) the inability of Lessee to use the Premises and facilities
continuing for a longer period than ninety (90) days due
to any law or any order, rule, or regulation of any
appropriate governmental authority having jurisdictior.
over the operations of Lessor or due to war, earthquake
or other casualtyf or
(4) the assumption or recapture by the United States Govern-
went or any authorized agency thereof of the Promises for
the maintenance and operation of said Airport and
f f facilities or any substantial part or parts thereof.
! I
Upon the hepi.ening of any of the four events listed in the
preceding paragraph, such that the Premises cannot be used for
authorized purposes, then Lessee may cancel this Lease as afore-
said, or may elect to continue this Lease under its terms.
1 Page 12
I
i
r
I
t'.
Y
l
s
XIII. OPTION ses Lessee shall have a first option to lease thevpreem the Lessor
additional term at the and of this Lease later than six (6) month s before the end
notice, in writing, not
of the fifteen (15) year term. Should Lessee choose to exercise five
(5) such ofor the Premises at the then cur entnland erental rrates
established by Lessor.
XIV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. ckWble {W or Assiaent. The Lessee shall not rent, or
sublease the Premises or assign this Lease without first obtaining
the written consent of Lessor. If approved by Lessor any sublessee
or assignee shall be subject to the same conditions, obligations
forth herein.
and terms as set H, Hirdiva on Succ°°Qo's and Assigns. All covenants,
rte, agreements, provisions and conditions of this Lease shall be
' binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective parties
hereto and their legal representatives, successors either ns. No
modification of this Lease shall be binding p party
unless written and signed by both parties.
t C. Sena abi=. If any provision hereof shall be finally
declared void or illegal by any court or administrative agency be void the
having ng rovisions shall continue ain effect astnearly asppossible
remaining p p parties.
in accordance with the original intent of the p
t D, Notice. Any notice given by one party to the other in
ent
connection with this Lease shall be in writing wand ith hall b postage
sand
E by registered mail, return receipt requriti
registration fees prepaid, as followst
If to Lessor, addressed tot it to Lessee, addressed tot
city Manager
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Notices lben receipt. received on the date of
receipt as shown on the retur
Q, ~Dya. The headings used in this Lease are intended
of this of define or limit the
for coavenienco of reference only and do
scope or meaning of any provision
H. •overn n4Ldtd. This Lsasc is to be construed in accordanco
` with the laws of the state of Texas.
Page 1J
I
J
,v
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease as
of the day and year first above writton.
CITY OF DENTONo TEXASe LESSOR
BY:
LLOYD HARRELL, CITY MANAGER
ATTESTi
JENNIFER WALTERSs CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK:
DEBRA ADAHI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BYt
I
LESSEE i
I
BYt
TITLEt
l I
I
Ct\WPSO\PADSITE.1
I
I
i
1
Pago 14 i
I
3
I` n
II
I
h
F
f
LAL
i
I
{i
I
i
I
1
I
r
! t
i
r
24541,
E
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING AN OFFICIAL VOTING REPRESENTATIVE TO
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL OF THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
SECTION I. That Jim Alexander is hereby appointed as the
offic a voting representative of the City of Denton to the
Regional Transportation Council of the North Central Texas
Council of Governments.
SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,
1989. {
PAY EP OR I
J
I
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
1
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
_
BY: Lot /a
T~X
R
I
I
a
I
IE
i
I
I
1 ~
II
l
r
Cf Tr of DxNTON. TBXAd 215 E, McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (617) 566.6200
MEMORANDUM
DATE; November 16, 1989
TO: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: SOUTH LOCUST AND MYRTLE TRAFFIC PLANS
The many discussions on this issue including the City Council Public Hearing
on November 7, 1989, have whittled this complex issue down to two solutions:
J
4 1. Close off both roads (South Locust and myrtle) to prevent any cross
traffic and depend on the proposed Collins at Fort Worth Drive signal
j to provide all access to area in a safe manner.
i
9, Maintain existing configuratio!:s of South Locust, Myrtle, and
Daugherty with strong commitmontn to the following (a - b):
as Build th.r bull-head shown in the backup for South Locust at Eagle
to eliminate or delay signalization till entire area is
reconfigured. Construction shall match completion of Eagle
Point - Phase i6
b. Consider CIP funds to upgrade South Locust and Myrtle except in j
the Eagle Point perimeter. Rough coat estimates for those are
included in the backup. Two-way traffic would be maintained.
With either choice, immediately close that portion of Myrtle between Daugherty
and South Locust for safety reasons.
i Note: All coat estimates provided are in 1989 dollars.
Jer Clark
wp
2766s
r low
3
f _Y
i
Y q
I
i
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: S. Locust and Myrtle Street access issues in
conjunction with Eagle Point
RECOMMENDATION:
Close South Locust and Myrtle Streets at North Boundary of
Eagle Point or provide CIP funds to upgrade and prohibit
signalization at Eagle and South Locust
SUMMARY:
Access fn this area should be handled as to promote safe and I
efficient traffic movements and not create additional 1
congestion and accident prone situations
BACKGROUND:
City Council, Planning and Zoning, and Traffic Safety have all
seen and discussed this issue. P 6 Z and CTSSC recommendations
are included in packet. ,
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: I
The traveling public, businesses and land owners in area, and
the City, specifically Public Works, Planning, and Utilities
FISCAL IMPACT:
$0 - $200000000 J
0773E
/ I
g
t
WY of DEWON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDINO / DENTON. TEXAS 70201 / TELEPHONE (SIT) 580.8907 JI
Office of the Gty Manager 1
M E M O R A N D U M
70: Lloyd V. Harrell, City manager
FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager
DATE: September 15, 1989
SUBJECT: Action Oft Myrtle Street
We have included all the information from the
progress for she
Eagle Point Subdivision and the off site problems It sight
create* what we are looking for from the Council is direction
for the staff. As Jerry's information suggests, staff is still
concerned about people using Locust and Myrtle to a such larger
extent. This would cause us to look at major Improvements as
well as extensive signalization on Eagle. Both P9Z and the
{ Traffic Safety Support Co mission have suggested only closing
Myrtle. This is a viable solution if we plan to make
substantial improvements in the future. As Jerry's information 1
indicates, we think a major improvement to the two Commissions,
j suggestions would be the traffic improvements at Locust that
` would allow for only right in and right out movements at Eagle
and Locust Streats.
We think either option can work and we would like some
direction from the Council as to which way staff should
proceed. We will proceed in this direction when the Eagle
Point Subdivision is submitted In the final platting process.
Staff will be available at your convenience to answer any
quol ns you might have.
Bick S is
Deputy City Manager
RS:nb
1168C
I
I
-
I
1
I
I
4
FL)
YofDBNTON, TSXAs MUNICIPAL BUILDING DEN TON, TEXAS 76101 TELEPHONE (8,17) 566.820(
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 14, 1989 J
TO: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager 1!
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer V
SUBJECT: Myrtle/Locust - Eagle Pointy
I will try to summarize the process that has occurred witn the
Myrtle/South Locust road effects on Eagle Point. -To date, this
issue has been considered by City Council, Planning and 2,ning,
Traffic Safety, and all levels of City Staff.
I I
Our original recommendation is shown as Alternative A. Our
feeling then and now is that the infrastructure on Myrtle and
Locust will not support the anticipated loading o from short
cutters, 'delivery trucks, and others. A new signal at Collins w
at Ft. Worth Drive would provide all the necessary access to
that effected'.'.are a off Ft, worth urive. Most of the
infrastructur& --problems are significant with potential s
liability if motorists have mishaps with the narrow roads, deep
borrow ditches.;,_drainage problems, and most significantly the
effects on•So th Locust at Eagle. Future signalization will
create excesiTve delays at the Bell-Eagle Intersection as
motorists have to travel about 200 Detween the two future
coordinated signals.
This action accentuates the geometry problems with the sharp
bend at the railroad bridge, the narrowness of that bridge, and
heavy traffic volumes to the University of North Texas and the
~-_-I Central Bus ineji!,District.
Traffic Safety* Commission felt that only Myrtle Street should
be closed and ware urged by staff to limit OauYherty to private
access. They accepted that as shown by the plan labeled The aodbulld head Alternative S, island)Ceat chair, Alice Eagle/Locust
orto recommended eliminate
future signalitation by allowing right-in right-out movements
11 only That was not accepted by Traffic Safety but staff feels
the idea is excellent.
Y ~iY. Ir
~aXr4
1 ~P
I{r~
I yb T
Rick Svehla
` Myrtle/Locust-Eagle Point
page 1
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission reconsidered the issue and
agreed with Traffic Safety except that Daugherty was opened
back up Backup from that meeting and Traffic Safety was
expansive and most issues were eliminated by those two bodies.
Therefore, we have pared the concepts down according to their
uidance. Several alternatives that limited access through cul
de sacs or partial closings were not included as they were
ir not
determined to have merit by Planning and g and Safety.
If the City Council feels the roads should be left open, except j
upgrade Locust those Droadsrtto tsafely Psufunds pportshould
way
Myrtle allocated o to South
traffic. Construction of two lane curbed streets with drainage
will oe paid for by reducing all most certain liability
exposure. The final issue in our opinion is to limit exposure
to future signalitation at Locust and Eagle. The bull head
(right-in and right out) would be a critical. Infrastructure
costs could run as nigh as 1.S zillion dollars if all the worst
scenarios occur to this quadrant.
0751E
E V4
I ~
t
f
r
ti
i
n 'e
H
LiU
~ a
4
SCULPTURES STUDIO
>•IOUSE BUILT
Ili
V
ELECTRIC SUSMTION
4
DAUGHEM
PIZZA
PLANr
3p~ NURSERY
A%
1DOLE PONT N
INMAN
i
w E
~s AREA MAP
s
I
l
{
1
A :
1
U ' LULU
Ll Ufa
Q~
Qp
4
~FrUURES
HOUSE BUILT
ARO"
ELECTRIC SUOMTiON
DAILIGH
CLOSE PIZZA
p NURSERY
~ PLANT POINT N
LOSE
~ . INMAN
ABANDON
l
36 WA MAP A
3
V Li Li o L
~
~i REBUT LC
250,000+0
EAGLE DRIVE i,soa,oeo
SIGNALCM
NTERSECT"
100,000
ESTIMATES BASED ON 1989 DOLLAR WL SSti010 mom wu Bourn Lo~0u w. 50000 +o 240,000
I! I!
r _ 2 MYRTLE ST. 335,000 to
R.O.W. 150.000 • fi54,000 ER"
Ill MtCT c W"11TON
F ~
Q4''
PANT
o
FAQ. ~ ru~~ar I
INMAN
REEILD E
ALAREA MA ~ E
i
I
i
a
~ e
i
~ EAGLE ORIVE
4
I
CULITLAU lTU010
ELECTMc StAMTION
Q~ DAUSHERTY ACCESS
I PUBLIC OR PRIYITr-
~r CVY/~L(L~//~o}
INMAN
E
pp41~~i1a 11L1"E.µA'~1~
;
1 i
1
i
F
I
r
I
4.
r
r
4.Z'd1S bI;ON 3Abf10'0d
t
N
1D S 5/
cli
h ~N
r1i
~l•ZL+1'0'1S gl
ON 3A2jr)o
£1 ON3AMf):) d s
M a` ~ 111.111,
8-B bb
a'~ 1
N
4
tD
a
Ik I ~ aI
P I
1 m
III 1 6i n Jam,..
y z i
f,- 1 P
uk~
B-B ,£b .
N
it
, zZ r i0