The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989 f 1 I 13 fjfN${jam] P= U 1 CITY o/DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING /DENTON,TEXAS 76201/TELEPHONE(817)5668200 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES i MEMORANDUM ) . , t TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager FROM: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities I DATE: July 20, 1989 I i I GE; Ray Roberts Outlet Conduit Payment { We performed a fairly extensive analysis of the cost and 1 interest rate applied to the Corps of Engineers project, but i were not able to prove up much off a savings over the Corps original position. At our request, the Corps went back through their various departments and then reconfirmed with the Treasury Department that the payment for the Ray Roberts Conduit should be an "as built cost" with a long term interest rate in effect during the year the project was initiated, all due payable upon the Corps I approval for Denton to use the pipe. A confirming letter is I attached, In summary, we tried very hard to get payment reduced, but the Corps is standing by their original position. Although this $1,070,000 seems high, I might note that Lewisville needs to install an outlet works in Lake Lewisville for their view (and existing) water plant; and preliminary estimates of costs are ! In the $4-5 million range. K. It. Nelson; Execut ve D rector ' Department of Utilities kkn Attachment 6441U:13 3 { DED=CA'T'ER T'c) QUAT-ixrrY SEI2V2CE ;t, s k Yt j~ f 4 ~ DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FORT WORTH DISTRICT, CCrRPS OF ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 17300 FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76102.0300 eifieTO x ors July 13 , 1989 - Design Branch Engineering Division JJ ifr, Bob Nelson Executive Director of Utilities City of Dene.on 215 East McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr. Nelson; l( This is a follow-up to the telephone conservation on 1 July 10, 1989 between you and Mr, Jack Hussey of our Civil Engineering Section, regarding interest during construction for the penstock at Ray Roberts Lake. i I The interest rate of 9,00 percent is determined by the Department of Treasury relating to hydropower purposes under Secretarial Order RA 6120.2 paragraph 11(c) of the Secretary of i Energy and Departmental Manual 730 DM 3 superseding Secretarial j Order 2929 of the Secretary of Interior, This is illustrated on the enclosed chart of interest rates, If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Mr, Jack Hussey or Mr. Steve Armstrong at telephone (817) l 334.2311. { { Sincerely, j W. H, Nill, PEE, Chief, Engineering Division Enclosure I r 7 in e, i NoV ?..0 '98 1,4:18 P. 2/4 ' ' 11 NCu Srwtr DR Wr1pSgM 74vN5+3~ Water Supply Interest Rate Interest rates determinad by the Department of the Treasury ip accord with provisions of the Water Supply Act of-1958, Station 301 (b). Notes These rates ire applicable prior to the effective date (17 Yovomber 1980) of PL 99-684. Subsequent to that date provisions of Section 106 of PL 99-882 apply to water supply and other purposes except hydroelectric power requiring repayment. 1409 2.670% 1976 4.371% ( 1960 211199% I970 8.118y. 1981 2.632% 1977 61683% ) 1901 2,742% 1978 81083% 1963 210118% 1979 81e0tlx 1964 3.046% 1980 7.200% i 1965 3,137% 1981 8.005% load 3,222% 1982 91352% I 1987 3.290% 1083 10,031% 1908 0.253% 1983 10,403% 19do 3125E% 1985 10,899% 1970 3,342% 1980 111070% 19,11 3,463% 1987 10,093% 1972 31502% 1988 10.371% 1973 3440% 1060 10,20" ~ s 1973 a.o12z f ~ f I Hydropower Interest Rate _i Interest rates detarminvd by the Department of the Treasury relating to hydropower purposes under Storttari-.l Order RA 8120,11 Paragraph It (a) of the Secretary of Rnergy and Departmental lAanual 730 Dbi 3 superseding $earetsrial Order 2020 of the 9eerttary of the Interior, Hotta 'these rates are applicable to calculation of interest during construction and repayment of investment cost, F joal Year Rate Ft"11 Year sga 1973 5.100% 1982 0,000% E--~- 1083 0,600% 1074 5.020% 1079 ,4,170% 1084 10,100% 1978 a.a11tlX 1980 12.375% 1977 7.0001. lsRd 11,375% 1078 7,000% 1987 8.875% 1979 7,600% 1989 8.300% I 1980 8,000% 1980 9.250% E 1991 B,tl00x { 6 a J r V f I COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES DEBT MAINTENANCE TOTAL ROE SERVICE CASH PRESENT OUTLAY VALUE F{ ALTERNATIVE I $3,9661260 $3 310r197 $3f063f922 7E266 447 $3,014,308 ~n ALTERNATIVE II 40649060 3,839,828 376,216 81670,094 3092,480 a ~y ALTERNATIVE III 4,691,200 4066,670 8,7461770 3,632,220 ALTERNATIVE IV 2,2961600 4066,670 61461,170 2,917,710 j ALTERNATIVE V 3066,260 4,1661670 81111,820 3018j316 ALTERNATIVE VI 30661260 31839,828 376416 8,172494 3,233,407 DESCRIPTION vi' ALTERNATIVES kk I I ALTERNATIVE I Steel Tank f ~E ALTERNATIVE .II Round Concrete Tank ALTERNATIVE III Flat Concrete Tank ALTERNATIVE IV Flat Concrete Tank with 60% waiver oi, ROE ALTERNATIVE V Plat Concrete Tank with $400,000 waiver do ROB i E ALTERNATIVE V1 Round Concrete Tank with $200,000 waiver on ROB i G "s s L1 ALTERNATIVE I Steel Tank In:tiat cost of steel tank = $625,000 Initial cost of bUilding and ground - $l,000,000 DEB T TO rAL , VALUE OF F-FRVICE CASH PRESENT AaSEI ROE COST MAINTENANCE OUTLAY VR1..UF Yaar• ! $1.62.5,000 $141.SOD $16.5,50'7.34 0,00 $'263,000 '2 Year 2 1,612,500 96,750 165,509.8.9 6. L3, Year 3 1,600,000 Q6,000 0.00 262,260 ?_24, 16S,509.84 0.00 261,510 207, r Year 4 1,587,500 95,250 165,509.84 0.00 260,760 Year .5 0,575,000 7 191,66 4,500 165,50Y.84 0.00 260,010 176.951 , Year 6 1,562,500 93,750 165,509,84 0,00 259,260 163,371 Year 7 L,550,000 93,000 165,509.84 0.00 258,510 150,831 , Year 8 1,537,500 92.250 165,509,84 0.00 257,760 Year, 9 1,525,000 '71,500 06. 139,261 { 5,509.84 0.00 257,010 L28,:5F.i' 6 Year 10 1,512,500 90,750 165,509.84 240,954.16 497,214 Year 11 1,500,000 90,000 165,509.84 230,30, Year 12 1,487,500 89,250 165,509,84 0100 255,510 109.58. Year L3 1,475,000 88,500 165,509.84 0'00 254,760 101,16 ; Year 14 ],462,500 87,750 165,509.84 0.00 254,010 93,3q' { Year LS 1,450,000 37, 0.00 253.260 86,221 000 165,50'?.84 0.00 252,510 79,60; 3 Year 16 1,437,500 86,250 165,509.84 Year 07 1,425,000 85 1500 1$5,.509.94 0'00 251,760 73,4Rc 1 0100 251,010 67,841 f Year 18 1,412,500 84,750 165,509.84 I Year 19 1.400,000 134,000 165,509.84 0.00 250,260 62,62' Year 20 0.00 249,510 F 1,387,500 57,81, 83,27,0 165,509-84 356,671.03 605,431 Year 21 1.375,OOr, 12,0, 89, ' 82,.500 0.00 0.00 82,500 Year 22 1.362,500 81,750 0.00 16,38' 1 Year 23 1,;.50,000 81,000 0100 00..00 00 61,750 15,03• 81 , 000 13,794 Year 24 11337,500 80,250 0.00 0100 80,250 n t , Year 25 L,325,000 79.500 0.00 1 ,65. Year 26 1,312,500 78,750 0.00 79,500 11,60E Year 27 1,300,000 78,000 0.00 0.00 78,750 10,54' Year 28 1,287,500 77 250 0.00 0.00 78,000 , , 0.00 0,00 77,250 8 ,95, 5, Year 29 1,275,000 76,500 0.00 0.00 76,500 82L Year 30 1,262,500 75,750 0.00 527,960.25 603,710 590,99 Year 31 1,250,006• 75,000 0.00 0.00 75,000 6,90 Year 32 1,237,500 74,250 0.00 0.00 74,250 6,32 Year 33 1,225,000` 73,500 0.00 0.00 73,500 5,79 Year 34 1,212,500 72,750 0.00 0100 72,750 5,31 j Year 35 1,200,000 72,000 0.00 0100 '72,000 4,87 Year 36 1,187,500 71,250 0.00 0100 71,250 4,46 Year 37 11175,000 70,500 0.00 0.00 70,500 4,08 Year 38 1.162,500 69,750 0.00 0.00 69,750 3,74 Year 39 11150,000 617,000 0,00 0.00 69,000 3.43 Year 40 1,137,500 68,250 0100 781,510.14 849,760 39,11 3 F _ 'ter r - VALUE OF DEBT ASSET SERVICE TOTAL - ROE COST PtAI CASH 7 - Year 41 1,125, 000 JJ TE-hJ•.A-hl--CE OUTLAY PRESENT 67,500 VALUE Yyar• 42 ,500 - L,112,500 0.00 Year 43 - r 43 11100,000 0.00 0.00 67,500 year 44 1,087.500 66,000 0 O.OV 66,750 2,87 Year 45 .500 65.250 .00 0.00 2,634 Year 46 1 , 075, 0001 64 x).00 O 66 . CtOO 2,41-, ,500 .OO 1 062, 5OV 0.00 65,250 .00 21)1 Year 47 1,OS0,OOO b,,750 0 0.00 64,500 { Year 4t3 l,O37.SOt) 63,000 0.00 O 63,750 <,O2J I Year 49 62,250 . OU 0.00 1,841: Year 1,025,000 61,500 0.00 63,000 .50 0 00 250 1,69E L , 012 , SOO 60. 75r) 0.00 O . UO 62, 1,54F . 0.00 1,1.56,8 61,500 1,411 f 25'92 1.217,576 SS,'?56,250 $3,310,196.80 25,76, $3063,921.50 $7,266,447 $3,014,307 5. E j I I i i i e r i { i E i, i; i a 10 u ; AI_rcRPIATIVE it _ - _ Round-'Concrete Tank Snit I cost of round concrete tank = r68g5 01?00 Initial cost of building and ground =S1,00U,0000 VALUE OF DEBT it k ASSET POE COST PRESENT SEhVICE TASAI. MAINTENANCE OIJTI.,AY ` e VALUE + 1 Year 1 $1,885,000 $113,100 Year 2 1,867,300 191,991,41 Year 3 !12,038 191,991.41 ~p,Op $304 029 $305,091 ,091 Year 1.849,600 110,976 191,991.41 4 1,831,900 0,00 281,509 Year 5 109,914 191,991.41 302,907 259,746 f Year 6 1,814,200 108,852 191 991,41 0.0p 301,905 234,662 f 1,796,500 107,790 191,991.41 0.00 300,843 221,129 i year 7 1,778,800 106,728 0.00 299 781 Year 8 1,761,100 191,991,41 0.00 204,026 f Year 9 105,666 191,99 1,41 238,719 188,244 Year 1,743,400 104,604 19991, 0.00 297,657 173 680 Year 1~ 1,725,700 103,542 191,991.44L I 1 0.00 2960595 .60,241 Year 12 1,690,300 102,480 191,991,41 0.00 295;533 147 840 101,418 191,991.41 294,471 136,397 Year 13 1,672,600 100,356 191 991.41 Q 00 293,409 125,838 Year 14 1,654,900 99,294 191,991.41 0.00 292,347 116,095 Year 15 1,637,200 98,232 191,99).41 0.00 291 285 j Year 16 1,619,50C) 0.00 107,105 " f Year 17 97,170 191,492.41 280'271 98,810 L,601,800 96,108 191,991.41 0.00 289,261 Year 18 1,584,100 91,156 r ~I Year 19 95,1146 191,991.41 0.00 288,037 84.Qg3 1,566,400 93,984 191,991,41 0'00 287,037 77,577 i Year 20 1,548,700 92,922 191,991,41 0.00 285,975 Year 21 1,531,000 71,565 Year 22 1,523,300 01,66Q 0.00 0'OQ 284,913 66;028 ? Year 23 1 90,798 0-00 0 91,860 19,708 ,495,600 89,736 .00 0.60 90,7''38 Year 24 1,477,900 0.00 0,00 18,038 Year 25 88,674 0.00 89,736 16,506 ` Year 26 1,46(),200 87,612 0.00 0.00 88,674 15,103 1,442,500 86,550 102,680.04 190,29 2 3D,OA9 Year 27 0 1,424,800 85,488 '00 0.00 86,550 Year 28 1,407,100 84 426 0.00 0.00 12.638 Year 29 1,389,400 0.00 85:488 11,558 Year 30 1 83,364 0 0.00 84,426 10,569 ,371,700 82,302 .00 0.00 83,364 E a Year 31 1,354,000 0.00 9,663 Year 32 1,336,300 81,240 0.00 0.00 82,302 8,833 Year 33 80,178 0,00 81,240 h 1,318,600 79,116 0.00 0.00 80,178 8,073 j Year 34 1,300,900 0.00 0.00 79,1 c6 7,378 f 78,054 Year 35 1,2B3,200 0.00 0.00 r 6,741 Year 36 1,265,500 76,992 0.00 78,0'4 6,158 i E Year 37 1,247,800 75,930 0 0.00 76,992 5,624 74,868 .00 0.00 75,930 Year 38 1,230,100 73,806 0.00 5,135 0.00 74,868 Year 39 1,212,400 72,744 0.00 O.UO 73 806 4,689 Year 40 1,194,700 0.00 0.00 72,744 4,280 71,682 0.60 3.906 0.00 71.682 3,564 yam.... F~ i !~3 Y3 I DEBT TOTAL VALUE OF SERVICE CASH PRESENT ASSET ROE----- -COST-- MATNTENANCE OUTLAY VALUE Year 41 1,177,000 70,620 0.00 0.00 70,620 -_-3.251 Year 42 1,159,300 69,558 0,00 0.00 69,55B 2,965 Year 43 1,141,600 68,4136 0,00 0.00 68,496 2,703 Year 44 1,123,900 67,434 0.00 0.00 67,434 2,464 Year 45 1,106,200 66,372 0.00 0,00 66,372 2,246 Year 46 11088,500 65,310 0.00 0.00 65,310 2,046 Year 47 1,070,800 64,248 0.00 0.00 64,248 1,864 Year 48 1,053,100 63,186 0.00 0.00 63,186 1,697 Year 49 1,035,400 62,124 0.00 0.00 62,124 1,545 Year 50 1,017,7Uo 61,062 0,00 273,536.24 334,598 7,705 E 4 ~ $4,354,050 $3,839,828.20 $375,216,28 $8,.570,094 $,3,3`72,480 E F j a 1 r i , ti. 4a 4. ALTERNATIVE II1 Flat Concrete Tank Initial oost_ of flat conorete tank = $1,040 000 Initial cost of building and ground = $1,000.000 VALUE OF DEBT TOTAL. ASSET SERVIC S E CASH ROE OUTLAY VALUE, - VALUE Year 1 X62,040,000 $122,400 I I< Year 2 2,019,200 $207,778.51 $330,179 $330,179 ( Year 3 1,998,400 129,952 207,778,51 328,931 304,565 Year 4 1,977,600 04 207,778.51 327,683 280,935 Year 5 118,656 207,778,51 { 1 1,956,800 117,408 207,778,51 326,435 259,134 i Year 5 1,936,000 325,187 022 Year 7 116,160 207 778.51 22x,467 f Year g 1,9 L5,200 114,91.2 207,778,51 323,939 22 350 1 1,894,400 113,664 207 778.51 321 443 203,350 Year 9 1,873,600 112,416 321,443 187,991 Year 10 1,852,800 207,778.51 320195 172 991 Year 11 1,832,000 111,168 207,770,51 318,,947 159,553 Year 22 1,$1],200 109,920 207,778.51 317,699 147,156 Year 1.3 1,790,400 108,424 207,778,51 316,451 135,720 - t Year 14 1,769,600 2.07,778,51 315,203 106,176 207,778.51 313,955 125,171 Year 1,5 1,748,800 104,928 207,778,51 115,440 Year 1,5 1,728,000 312,707 Year 1 1 103,680 207 778,51 106,464 17 ,707,200 102, 311,459 Year 18 432 207,778,51 98,185 1,686,400 101,184 310,211 90,547 Year 19 1,665,600 207,778.52 308,9fi3 .83,503 , Year 20 1,644,600 99'936 207,778,51 307,715 Year 21 98,688 207,778.51 306,467 7/,005 1,624,000 97,440 1,906 1 Year 22 1,603,200 0.00 97,440 20,906 Year 23 1,582,400 96,192 0,00 96,192 Year 24 94,944 0,00 17,4 4 1,561,600 93,656 94,944 17,464 Year 25 1,540,800 92,448 0,00 93,696 15,579 Year 26 1,520,000 91,200 0.00 92,448 14,579 Year 27 1,499,204 0.00 91,200 13,162 17 Year 28 1,47$,400 89°952 0.00 89,952 Year 29 88,704 0.00 12,162 1,457,600 87,456 88,704 11,105 Year 30 1,436,800 0.00 87,456 10,137 86,208 f Year 31 1,416,000 84,960 0.00 86,208 9,43 Year 32 1,395,200 0,00 84,960 8,443 t Year 33 1,374,400 83,712 0100 83,712 7 70 t Year 34 1,353,600 82,464 0.00 82,464 r 3 Year 35 81,216 0.00 7,407 1,332,800 7'7,968 81,216 6,407 Year 36 11312,000 0.00 79,968 5,841 Year 37 1,291 200 78,720 0.00 77,472 78,720 5,324 Year 38 1,270,400 76 0.00 77,472 4,420 Year 39 1,249,600 ,224 0.00 76,224 Year 39 74,976 0,00 4,420 40 1,228,800 73,728 74,976 , S 0.00 73,728 3,665 f~ it DEBT TOTAL VALUE OF SERVICE CASH PRESENT ASSET ROE COST OUTLAY VALUE Year 41 1,208,000 72,480 1.00 -72,480 131336 42 1,187,200 71,232 71,430 x,336 Year 43 1,166,400 ,59,984 0.00 71,232 3,036 Year 44 1,145,600 68,736 00.00 6'7'484 2,512 E. Year 45 1,124,800 67,478 .00 68,736 2.512 Year 46 1,104,000 .6,240 0.00 67,488 2,283 Year 47 1,083,200 0.00 66,240 2,075 4,992 0.00 64,992 11385 Year 48 1,062,400 63,744 0.00 63,744 Year 49 1,041,600 1,712 i' 62.496 0.00 62,496 1.554 Year 50 1,020,800 61,248 0.00 61,248 1,410 $4,591,200 $4,155.570.20 $8,746,770 $3,t;32,'20 3 i I 1 , 3 j i 4 h j { 1 I A1_TERNATIVE IV Flat concrete Tank with 50% waiver on ROE Initial cost of flat concrete tank = $1,040,000 Initial cost of building and ground = $11000,000 DEBT TOTAL VALUE OF SERVICE CASH PRESENT ASSET ROE COST OUTLAY VALUE - - Year 1 $2,040,000 $61,200 $207,778.51 $268,979 $268,979 Year 2 2,019,200 60,576 207,778,51 268,35.5 248,476 pi 4 Year 3 1,998,400 59,952 207,778.51 267,731 229,536 I Year 4 1,977,600 59,328 207,778. 51 267,107 212,038 Year 5 1,956,800 58,704 207,778,51 266,483 195,873 1 Year 6 1,936,000 58,080 207,778,51 265,859 180,939 Year 7 1,915,200 57,456 207,778,51 265,235 167,143 Year 8 1,894,400 56,832 207,778.51 264,611 154,398 Year 9 1,873,600 S.~,:^8 207,778.51 263,987 142,624 E g Year 10 1,852,800 55,584 207,778.51 263,363 131,747 Year 11 1,832,000 54,960 207,778.51 262,739 121,699 Year 12 L,811,200 54,336 207,778.51 262,115 112,416 Year 13 1,790,400 53,712 207,778.51 261,491 103,841 Year 14 1,769,600 53,088 207,778.51 260,867 95,920 Year 15 1,748,800 52,464 207,778.51 260,243 98,602 } Year 16 1,728,000 51,840 207,778.51 259,619 81,843 Year 17 1,707,200 51,216 207,778.51 258,995 75,598 Year, 18 1,686,400 50,592 207,778.51 258,371 69,830 Year 19 1,665,600 49,968 207,778,51 257,747 64,501 Year 20 1,644,800 49,344 207,778.51 257,123 59,578 Year 21 1,624,000 48,720 0.00 48,720 1,0,453 Year 22 1,603,200 48,096 0.00 48,096 9,555 Year 23 1,582,400 47,472 0.00 47,472 8,732 Year 24 1,561,600 46,848 0100 46,848 7,979 Year 25 1,540,800 46,224 0.00 46,224 7,259 Year 26 11520,000 45,600 0.00 45,600 6,658 Year 27 1,499,200 44,976 0.00 44,976 6,081 Year 28 1,478,400 44,352 0.00 44,352 5,552 Year 29 1,457,600 43,728 0.00 43,728 5,069 Year 30 1,436,800 43,104 0.00 43,104 4,626 Year 31 1,416,000 42,480 0.00 42,480 4,222 Year 32 1,395,200 41,856 0,00 41,856 3,851 Year 33 1,374,400 41,232 0.00 41,232 3,513 Year 34 1,353,600 40,608 0,00 40,608 3,204 Year 35 1,332,800 39,984 0.00 39,984 2,921 Year 36 11312,000 39,360 0.00 39,360 2,662 Year 37 1,291,200 38,736 0.00 38,736 2,426 Year 38 1,270,400 38,112 0.00 38,112 2,210 Year 39 1,249,600 37,488 0.00 37,488 21013 Year 40 1,228,800 36,864 0.00 36,864 1,833 , ii} ~E rf 4 VALUE OF DEBT TOTAL U ASSET SERVICE CASH ROE COST PRESENT OUTLAY VALUE -------------------------------------------I Year 41 1,208,000 36,240 Year 42 1,187,200 ^ Year 43 35,616 0.00 36,240 1,668 1,166,400 34,992 0.00 3.5,616 Year 44 1,145,,,00 34 0.00 34,992 1,518 Year 45 1,124,800 i768 0.00 1,381 Year 46 33,744 34.358 1,256 1,104,000 33,120 0,00 33,744 Year 47 1,083,200 0.00 1,142 Year 48 32,496 33,120 1,038 1,062,400 31,872 0.00 32,496 Year 49 1,041,600 0.00 31,872 943 Year SO 1,020,800 331,248 0,624 0.00 31 248 856 0,00 30,624 77 705 F $2,295,600 $4,155,570.20 $6,451,170 $2,917,710 ~ I i i I i i r I I i y r. , ALTERNATIVE V Initial coat of flat concrete tank = $1,040,000 Initial cost of building and ground $1,000,000 DEBT TOTAL VALUE OF SERVICE CASH PRESENT ASSET ROE COST OUTLAY VALUE F / Year 1 $29040,000 $97,600 $207,778,51 $306,279 $305,279 Year 2 2,0191200 96,760 207,778.51 304,529 281,971 Year 3 11998,400 960000 207,778.61 303,779 260,441 Year 4 1,977,600 95,250 207,778.51 3030029 240,664 E Year 5 1,966,800 94,600 207,778.51 302,279 222,184 L Year 6 1,936,000 93,760 207,778.61 301,629 206,216 Year 7 11915,200 93,000 207,778.51 300,779 189,641 i Year 8 1,894,400 92,250 207,778.61 300,029 175,064 i i Year 9 1,873,600 910500 207,778.61 299,279 1610691 Year 10 198629800 90,750 207,778.61 298,629 1490339 Year 11 1,832,000 900000 2070778.51 297,779 137,929 j Year 12 198110200 89,260 207,778.61 297,029 127,390 I Year 13 1,790,400 88,500 207,778.51 2960279 117,666 I Year 14 11769,600 87,760 207,178.51 2960629 108,665 Year 16 1,748,800 87,000 207,778.61 294,779 100,361 Year 16 1,728,000 86,250 207,778.51 294,029 92,690 I Year 17 1,707,200 86,500 207,778.61 293,279 860605 Year 18 1,686,400 84,760 207,778.61 292,629 79,061 Year 19 1,666,600 84,000 207,778.61 291,779 73o017 Year 20 1,644,800 83,260 207,778.61 291,029 670436 Year 21 1,624,000 82,500 0.00 82,600 17,700 Year 22 1,603,200 81,760 0100 81,750 16,240 Year 23 1,682,400 81,000 0.00 81,000 14,899 Year 24 1,6610600 80,250 0.00 80,260 130668 Year 26 1,64Qj800 79,600 0100 79,500 120537 I Year 26 1,6200000 78,750 0.00 78,760 11,499 i Year 27 1,49, '019-0 780000 0,00 78,000 10,646 Year 28 1,4 7,'400 77,260 0,00 77,260 99671 Year 29 1,4619600 76,500 0.00 760500 8,867 Year 30 1,436,800 76,750 0100 76,760 80130 Year 31 1,4!6,000 75,000 0.00 75,000 7,463 Year 32 1,396,200 74,250 0.00 74,250 60832 Year 33 1074,400 730600 0.00 730500 60262 Year 34 10353,600 72,760 0.00 72,750 6,739 Year 36 11332,800 720000 0100 72,000 60259 Year 36 11312,000 71,260 0100 719250 4,819 Year 31 1,291,200 70,600 0.00 70,600 4,416 Year 38 1470,400 69,760 0,00 69,750 4,045 Year 39 11249,600 69,000 0,00 69,000 30706 Year 40 1,228,800 68,260 0.00 68,250 3,393 t 15 M%%1 V VALUE OF DEBT TOTAL. SERVICE ASSET ROE COST CASH PRESENT OUTLAY VALUE Year 41 1,208,000 year 42 b7,S00 0.00 67,500 1,187,200 66,750 3,807 Year 4,3 1,166,400 0,00 66,750 2,845 Year 44 1,145,600 66,000 0.00 66,000 2, 65.250 60.5 Year 4.5 1,L24,800 64,500 0.00 65,250 2,384 4 1 Year 46 1,104,000 63,750 O.00 64,500 21182 Year 47 8,083,200 0.00 63.o00 63,750 1,997 Year 48 1,062,400 0.00 63,000 L.8 27 Yea 62,250 0.00 62,250 Year 49 1,041,600 61 ,.500 0.00 1,672 Year 50 1,020,800 60,750 61,SOt) 1,529 j 0.00 60,750 11399 $3,956,250 $4,1.55,570,20 $8,111,820 $3,378,316 f j j Ii I 3 1 1 i 9 y } ALTEPNAiIVE VT Round concrete Tank with $200,000 waiver on ROE " Initial cost of round concrete tank = $885,0000 initial r,Ost of building .end ground =$1,000,rj000 f } b I S. DEBT TOTAL VALUE OF SERVICE CASH PRESENT f ASSET -------ROE COSTMAINTENANCE OUTLAY VALUE Year 1 $1,885,000 $97,500 191,991.41 $0,00 $269,491 $289,491 Year 2 1,867,300 96,750 191,991.41 0.00 288,741 267,353 Year 3 1,849,600 96,000 191,991.41 0,00 287,991 ~ 87,991 246,906 j Year 4 L,831,900 95,250 191,991.41 0100 287,241 228,021 Year 5 1,814,200 94,500 191,991.41 0.00 286,491 210,580 Year 6 1,796,500 93,750 191,991.41 0.00 285,741 194,471 Year 7 1,778,800 93,000 191,991.41 0100 284,991 179,593 Year 8 1,761,100 92,250 191,991.41 0.00 284,241 165,857 E Year 9 1,743,400 91,500 191,991..41 0.00 283,491 153,162 Year LO 1,725,700 90,750 191,991.41 0.00 282,741 141,441 Year 11 1,708,000 90,000 191,991.41 0.00 281,991 130,617 Year 12 1,690,300 89,250 191,991.41 0.00 281,241 L20,620 Year 13 1,672,600 88,500 191,991.41 0100 280,491 111,387 Year 14 1,654,900 87,750 191,991.41 0.00 279,741 102,860 f Year 15 1,637,200 87,000 191,991.41 0.00 278,991 94,986 I` Year 16 1,619,500 86,250 191,991.41 0.00 278,241 8'7,7L,3 ` Year 17 1,601,800 85,500 191,991.41 0.00 277,491 80,997 Year 18 1,584,100 84,750 191,991.41 0100 276,741 74,795 Year 19 1,566,400 84,000 191,,91,41 0,00 275,991 69,067 1 Year 20 1,548,700 83,250 191,991,41 0.00 275,241 63,777 Year 21 1,531,000 82,500 0,00 0.00 82,500 17,700 Year 22 1,513,300 81,750 0.00 0.00 81,750 16,240 Year 23 1,495,600 81,000 0.00 0.00 81,000 14,899 f Year 24 1,477,900 80,250 0.00 0,00 80,250 13,668 Year 25 1,460,200 79,500 0.00 102,680.04 182,180 28,730 1 'fear 26 1,442,500 78,750 0.00 0.00 78,750 11,499 Year 27 1,424,800 78,000 0.00 0.00 78,000 10,546 j Year 28 1,407,100 77,250 0.00 0100 77,230 9,671 j Year 29 1,389,400 76,500 0.00 0.00 76,500 8,867 Year 30 1,371,700 75,750 0.00 0.00 75,750 81130 Year 31 1,354,000 75,000 0.00 0.00 75,000 7,453 Year 32 1,336,300 74,250 0.00 0100 74,250 6,832 Year 33 1,318,600 73,500 0.00 O.G'l 73,500 6,262 Year 34 11300,900 72,750 0.00 0.00 72,750 5,739 Year 35 1,283,200 72,000 0.00 0.00 72,000 5,25q 4 Year 36 L,265,500 71,250 0.00 0,00 71,250 4,819 Year 37 1,247,800 70,500 0.00 0.00 70,500 .4,415 Year 38 1,230,100 69,750 0.00 0.00 69,750 4,045 Year 39 1,212,400 69,000 0.00 0,00 69,000 31705 Year 40 1,194,700 68,250 0.00 0.00 68,250 3,373 sts~urn uy L+ ~tl G w { GtBT TOTAL VALUE OF SERVIr,E ASSET ~ CASH PRESENT ROE -OST MAINTENANCE OUTLAY VALUE - _ Year 41 1,177,000 67,500 0.00 0.00 67,500 Year 42 1,159,300 66 , 750 0.00 3,107 S Year 43 1,141,600 0.00 66,7.50 2,845 6,000 0.00 0.00 66,000 Year 44 1,123,900 655,250 2,605 0,40 1 Year 45 1,106,200 64,500 Q•00 65,250 2,384 Year 46 1,088,500 63,750 0.00 0.00 64,500 2,182 Year 47 1,070.800 63,000 0'QO 0.00 63,7.SQ 1,997 Year 48 L,053,L00 62,250 0.00 0.00 63,000 1,827 1 Year 49 1,035,400 61,500 0.00 0'00 62,250 1:672 0.00 Year 50 1 .00 61,500 1,529 ,OLJ,700 0 60,750 0.00 273,536.24 334,286 7,698 $3,956,250 $3,839,828.20 $376,216.28 $8,172,294 $3,233,407 1 i i i { p s , r j: f~ I i i ,f CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING I DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE(817) 566-8200 MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: November 29, 1989 I i TO. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager i , t FROMt R.E. Nelson, Exec. Director of Utilities { ! REs Lewisville/Ray Roberts Lake Information Committee t ; j i Attached is a-response from Congressman Armey's-office regarding the subject meeting, plus notes taken at the meeting. I noticed l that they did not enter into the notes my question to Armey's staff f i about whether Armey's office would consider helping us allocate f some disaster relief funds to help defray some $1,000,000 t additional costs to Ray Roberts caused primarily by the 1989 spring ' { E floods that Ray Roberts Reservoir encountered. r E i i 1r~7x R. E. Nelso , Executive Director i Department of Utilities f gur j ccs Howard Martin, ESA i file Attachments Ltr of 11/20/89 from Dick Armey I Notes taken at the Meeting of 11/14/89 LL RRINFO. NOV I 007 J i 3 3 4 DED=GATED ~'O gLTALZTY SERV2CE If C2 f CONGRESSMAN DICK ARMEY 25TH DISTRICT, rEXA$ t 1 k' r ms7rr,! Oul:❑ • 250 50Vix Sr,u wOnp F t - 5VIR 210 1Hi.4VU 11w,swi L7X 75Cbi N.NNON.faIx"?ON 01r, , e OC20 0M5615 V_ ' x21/1 221-027 12021225-1172 -:apw,rrtrr 4t•.1301 SOUTH 80,1114 '4010 BUDGET Swn/22 An IAxOIOH, tX 16D13 EDUCATION AND IABOA ~ottgre~~ of ~fje 'ttitebtate~ 16171181-2555 18171383-3315 rpYl f)aus'e of Aepregentatiba i.NOM C" 0, O[N a~fjington,1~ 20515 November 20, 1989 Bob Nelson Executive Director, Utilites City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Bob, Thank you for attending the meeting of the Lewisville/Ray Roberts Lake Information Exchange Committee. I appreciate your participation at this meeting and would encourage you to find a means of providing information gathered from the discussion to your community, i Enclosed are notes taken at the meeting regarding discussions, questions, and actions to anticipate. Also enclosed is a list of the expanded membership. Hopefully this material will be useful to you seek to serve your community in providing information concerning the lakes, If you have have any questions regarding these enclosures, please contact Shelby Hiser in the Lewisville office. The next Committee meeting will be scheduled for early f{ 1990. You will be notified of the date, time, and place well in advance so that you can make arrangements to attend, In the meantime, I hope you have you have a very happy holiday season and a sucocssful New Year, j Sincerely, c t Dick Armey Member of Congress DA/jlc Enclosure f aunt N N i li Source; Dick Armey, Congressman LAKE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE November 14, 1989 l The Lake information Exchange Committee for Lakes Lewisville and Ray Roberts met on Tuesday, November 14, 1989 at the Lewisville Lake State Park, Group Dining Hall, The meeting was opened at 9:30 a.m. by Rex Boyd, Project Manager for Lake Lewisville, i Each member of the Committee introduced themselves and the I group heard remarks from the new District Engineer, Colonel W. Doug Brown. Bill Cotten gave a status report on the Greenbelt project which has not been approved by Congress as of this date. The question was asked what the cities could expect to be able to do in order to piggy back the Greenbelt concept and what provision would be made to accommodate handicapped in this recreational area. Bill explained that the area would not afford the kind of recreation normally experienced in a full blown lake development but would provide the possibility of equestrian trails, hiking, nature trails, etc. As much as possible, the Corps would make sure that the area was accessible to the handicapped. However, there would be areas and instances where this was not possible, There was a question about hunting within the Greenbelt Corridor, Bill explained that this was not likely because it is a narrow area, The question of wildlife management and stocking was then addressed, The area will not likely be stocked with game but there will be (and is currently) an effort to improve current stock and to encourage new stook by improving the vegetation of the area. Texas Parks and Wildlife will probably be in charge of the management of this area. Already, that agency has a contreiet to manage the wildlife area around Ray Roberts ar,d they have instituted areas that are off limits for water fowl hunting in order to protect certain species of game. Bill also covered the status of agreements between the Cities of Dallas and Denton with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department' operation s Park Division of the for maintenance Corps Is in the proParks at cess of Ray Roberts, and with agency for drawing u longn tedmiti contracts the wild fthe management and racts lie area around Ray Roberts. operations of The construction of wetlands has been delayed due to high water conditions experienced the Construction on these this past ear, rjects is expect 1990 and agreements foroTexas Park, andewbegin .in earl the areas are in the works, ildlife to manage ' nage Paul Smith gave a report of the new construction, The enclosed mrpgresa on the repair of Lake Lewisville and the work that hassbeen one and the Work left to be :ompleted. Paul did ex a the work they havare ing with removin gaeponin the problem the Corps still tr in g the al the asphalt and this at a minimal costg to find the best way to accomplish for expected completion of hr following time frame was epaira ive I s 4 n January, 199x: February, 1990] design completed September, 1990= open for bids completion At this point, several questions were asked In 1988 there was. an extremel dry time and the lake was lake was shut down9, there were extremely wet times and down several boat ram addition, the Corps came in the could h and shut have at least lep repair all at once effect ft some when the the local econom open for continued use. The the Corps to keep some localwramssvore` is it possible for repairs? Jobie Smith, of p pert when they have to epailve, a also the Corps, answered in de he done ma in the pointed out that the Corps had tnot and past because of increased costs due to delay remobilization of the contractors ' equipment. ; Z• There was discussion of on the local discussion the consideration of the request that the economy when the Corps does somethin ind a mpact p cognizant of that g and a effect and .fa r; • I f i i communicate with the local community about projects. Which is why this Committee was organized. 3. Are there going to be boat ramps at Pilot Knoll. Rex Boyd answered in the affirmative. 4. Considerable discussion was held regarding whether the five year flood plan is sufficient considering the devastation of the most recent floods. Paul Smith then explained that the Corps learned a lot from these past floods and plans to supplement rip raft designs to allow more protection In the area between the rip raft and the parking area, While it may be agreed that the five year plan is not the most desirable, it is the best the agency can come up with given the trade off of purchasing additional property to raise the levels or of hauling in ! more fill. The agency is only allowed to purchase the land that has been acquired and it is recognized that this is insufficient to accommodate the best of conditions in the k event of another flood. 5. Why did the 1981 floods not close the access to the 1 lake? Because there was no need to protect new construction I projects that were already underway. Areas that have allowed traffic to prematurely use facilities are now experieneirig break down of the roads and area construction that had been put in prior to the floods. in addition, we had high water all summer because only so much water could be dumped downstream at one time to alleviate the effect on others in those area. 6. The point was made that the water rights for both Lake Lewisville and Ray Roberts belong to Dallas. Denton shares in these rights with Dallas at Ray Roberts. In addition, these two cities are cost sharing the expenses for recreational areas at Ray Roberts. Therefore, what they ! decide to do impacts a lot of communities which do not have ! any input because they are not paying the bill. Understandably, Dallas and Denton have to worry that any decisions made do not impact their end users in higher water bills. I y. p 1 P~ ~I 5 I) al ;E ti 6 The last item on Paul Smith's report addressed the seepage at Ray Roberts dam. Completion of some 30 relief wells is expected to be completed in June of 1990, This should alleviate the ground saturation below the dam. 1 Bill Begole gave the following report of anticipated dates of completion for construction projects at Ray Roberts: Isles DeBois Park March, 1991 Johnson Branch Park March, 1992 Boat ramps at access points (7 in all) January, 1990 Motorized boats will be allowed on Ray Roberts in January, 1990 or as soon as the ramps are completed. There are currently only two parks planned for Ray Roberts. The enclosed schedule of anticipated dates for completion of E construction at Lake Lewisville was distributed, Jean Campbell, of Congressman Armey's district office, spoke briefly of the need for people to communicate with the Corps about problems. She reiterated that the Congressional office is always available for people to address concerns with :situations at the area lakes. The floor was opened for general questions and a variety of 1 subjects were discussed including s 1. Corps permits for mowing to alleviate fire and rodent hazards, 2. Possibility of other cities sharing with Dallas and Denton in costs of recreation at Ray Roberts so f they would have a voice in what goes on, 3. Communication between community and the Corps and how to improve on it, 4. Ranger activity at the area lakes. Colonel Brown gave the closing remarks and his assessment that the Lake Information Exchange Committee had served it's purpose today. At the next meeting, sometime in February, Congressman Dick Armey would be attending. r f I j The following numbers were given by col, Brown in the event that someone has a concern or a question prior to the next meeting: 214/434-1666 Lewisville Lake Project office 817/334-2153 John Jarboe w/ District Engineer 817/334-2300 Larry Rogers w/ District Engineer The meeting was a(Ijorned at a ~ I pproximately 12:00 noon. 1 (Note: These notes were taken by Jean Campbell and in no way reflect any agency's official position, nor the position E of any local entity represented at the meeting. This is merely an effort to afford those` not present with E information regarding the discussions and to aceomodate those present with a general record of the event.) i I r i i v T .sue I r4 . u6 r q ~ t to 16 t r I Mel - I ,t. H ~ ti I• ~ 1 ~ p , ~'R V ° ::tntlti~ lt, • X11,- • _ ~ r a'~ ,y C \ I ar 1 a 4 ~ G, h I 1 1 y ~ atwx.w T ; ' t' r I ~i' '1+-~l f j'' I l t ( ~j, ` 1%~ , ,''1`r"•, R i.... Jt'~ \1 s..- fi O I o f Y 1 1, It r ~ V o 3~ L o 6 It II y H Od h m N ar N y y M ?A O + k n a, p F H b by to H N co m I11 4 m p 4 Eb rt, 0 'o 2 14 W d O o a w oz rt ro n t+ a n~ 0 F ` p da p An a n h w rt N F~ HC t7 d C HN i tF . M c rt a n oN n g o ro ro P23 M A cp a x ~t N M O oN rD <n rD C P N 0. H M N C N oN n iFT'J N N N N N r Ob ,'C4i lib to N Nom. N N r... C1 01 (y VF vs cn M bo 1 fI i r y 'i t MK~as 11111211 0 LEWISVILLEJRAY ROBERTS LAKE EXCHANGE INFORMATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS ARGYLE, CITY OF NAME ADDR4~3 r The Honorable Norm Thomas Mayor, City of Argyle j P.O. Box 1035 Argyle, Texas 76226 817 464-7273 BARTONVILLE, CITY OF Gene Perry City Council City of Bartoaville 1941 East Jeter Road { Argyle, Texas 76226 817 430-4052 DENTON, CITY OF Bob Nelson Executive Director, Utilities City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 817 566-8230 i DOUBLE OAK, CITY OF f Bill Erwin 459 Medina Highland Village, Texas 75067 COPPER CANYON, CITY OF Butch Mallam City Council I 35 Estates Drive Lewisville, Texas 75067 Bob Peterson (Hunting) 1010 Mayberry Court Lewisville, Texas 76067 1 jyYtIRVF k'1 +:Y]FYtl 7,i cs;a;rv t (Fyn Hess v...r! at1 7f . LAKE DALLASr CITY OF Les Lorimer City of Lake Dallas 606 Myers Lake Dallas, Texas 75065 817 497-2083 (home) Chick Anderson 278 Main (small business) Lake Dallas, Texas 75065 817 497-3311 Jerry McCutcheon P.O. Box 968 (sportsman) Lake Dallas, Texas 76065 i cc to Office of the Mayor Hickory Creek C P.O. Box 368 Lake Dallas, Texas 75065 PILOT POINTr CITY OF Bill Alexander City Council, Pilot Point P.O. Box 517 ' Pilot Point, Texas 76258 817 686-2355 Edgar Evans P.O. Box 45 (Small Business) Pilot Point, Texas 76258 817 687-5133 Jim Neale P.O. Box 163 (recreational rep.) Pilot Point, 'texas 76258 817 686-2269 Cliff Lundford P.O. Box 531 (Sportsman Yep) Pilot Point, Texas 76258 817 686-2634 i i' i itfty'Ra A>, 4i fcf I s V i I LEWISVILLE, CITY OF The Honorable Donny Daniels Mayor, City of Lewisville 151 West Church Lewisville, Texas 75057 `I Steve Griffin 131 Degan, Suite 103 (sportsman) Lewisville, Texas 75057 214 221-9212 I Larry Smith Bank One '"r { (recreation) 250 S. Stemmons f Lewisville, Texas 75067 I DENTON, CITY OF Bob Nelson Executive Director, Utilities City of Denton G 215 East McKinney Denton, `Texas 76201 ; 817 566-8230 DOUBLE OAK, CITY OF Bill Erwin 459 Medina Highland Village, Texas 75067 i i I; t': t;'kxA"it II ~I 1 it COPPER CANYON, CITY OF Butch Mallam City Council 35 Estates Drive Lewisville, Texaa 75067 Hob Peterson (Hunting) 1010 Mayberry Court Lewisville, Texas 76067 June Tyler 10 Mobile Drive, Route 2 Lewisville, Texas 75067 { { Rick Douglass Riuk's Marine (small Business) 713 Chin Chapel Road Lewisville, Texas 75067 HICKORY CREEK, TOWN OF Russell Fodren city council/Hickory Creek 1301 sycamore Send Road Hickory Creek, Texas 76205 817 497-4263 Rick Mareny 120 North Hook Hickory Creek, Texas 75065 817 497-5525 Don $parr 29 Hickory Hills Boulevard ; (recreation rep.) Hickory Creek, Texas 75065 817 497-5781 R i W.A. McCutcheon McCutcheon Bait shop {shall business) 711 Denton Drive Hickory Creek, Texas 7$065 817 497-9502 ~ I p(Y'.tl Ad l'U Yr.?.. :idy f FLOWER MOUND, CITY OF Mel Rapp Director, Leisure Services 2121 Cross Timbers Flower Mound, Texas 75028 214 539-8511 John Bray 6812 Ferndale (Rcreational Rep,) Flower Mound, Texas 75028 214 518-5050 (office) 817 430-4367 (Home-metro) Tony Adams 137 Red Oak (Small Business) Flower Mound, Texas 75028 1 817 481-4733 {office} 214 539-2503 E I Pat Autore 4204 Rollo Court E (hunting) Flower Mound, Texas 75028 214 529-7489 (home) 214 424-4404 (office) 1 i i { { i t' I SANGER, CITY OF John Hamilton City Manager/City of Sanger P.O. Box 578 Sanger, Texas 76266 817 458-7930 Rev. Bill McClennan 202 Kathran Drive (recreational) Sanger, Texas 76266 817 458-4542 f Carl Ray Higgs P,O. Box 441 Sanger, Texas 76266 817 458-4542 Gary Lynch P.O. Box 357 Sanger, Texas 76266 817 458-3221 J SHADY SHORES The Honorable Olive Stephens Mayor, Town/Shady Shores PO Box 362 ` Lake Dallas, Texas 75065 { 817 497-2599 j i 1 h I t I, i r • p¢ 7 F';{y?5fr:1 1f, if l:ryi. r C/rYof DENMAI, 70EXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 August 23, 1989 Mr. Allen P. Reinke, Executive Director Texas Water Commission 1700 N. Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78701 Attn: William G. Crol ~ ley RE: City of Denton; Application to Amend Certificate of Adjudication No. 08-2335 (Pay Roberts Hydroelectrtd Project--Denton) Dear Mr. Crolley: In response to your letter dated July 26, 19890 the City of Denton makes i the following statement in furtherance of its Application to Amend 1 Certificate of Adjudication N : No. 08-2336: i City of Denton understands and agrees that the hydroelectric use ` i requested under its amendment application, if granted, will be granted on a non-priority basis, P { Authorization for my making this statement on behalf of the City, is evidenced by City resolution attached to the City of Denton's application for amendment, which is already on file with the Texas Water Commission. f Sincerely, for Lloyd Harrell, City Manager City of Denton. Texas 8Y'~ c ve a, a uty city Manager , Nelson, Executive Director City of Denton, Texas Department of Utilities l SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, this the day of August, 19890 to certify which witness my hand and seal o W lice ELWaNE~T11yiftLWAB rotary"/Pull c n or e o exec ` ' An Elizabeth J. Williams 5/15/93 'M xb' W^ftmartatws ; o ary s Printed Name an Expiration a e kkn 6470U:4 i ii t u r,d~a PJG 22 'e9 03r24 LAW oF"s Z BOOTH a. NEWSOM A pROFESSiONAL C>nRPQRKrfON 1900 FIRST CITY CENTRE A16 C(h:ORFSS AV6NUfi AUSTIN, TVAS 78701.1445 $12,470.9506 FAX.311ht1211 S srIERAY 4 PEEI. FRANK R. bWfl l PATAtCK J. 9UWVAN B. D. (WIP) NEWSOlA August 22, 1988 SWAN o. PO'rrs PATRICK W. uNDNeR CAR(CYNAHRENS TrMOTMYLI BROWN KE1TN A. PARI)AA MINAELr. KXM ANNOY WI.LON JAMES W .)OW." Mr, Allen P. EWnks, Jr. Executive Director Texas Water Commission 1700 N, Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 76701 Attn: William G. Crolloy RE: Cit o! Denton; Appilostion to Amend Cortlfloste of 3 AdrudioaIlan No. 08.2338 (Rey aaaborts Hydroelectric Proloot--Denton) Dear Mr. Crolley: In response to your letter dated July 26, 19890 the City of Denton makes the following statement in furtherance of Its Applloatlon to Amend Cert1loate of Adjudication No, 09.2335; G I The CRY of Denton understaIndo sendagreeri that the hyydrooleOtrta use requested under Its amendment applkmtion, M granted, wilt be granted on a non-priority basis, Authorization for my makln$ this statement on behalf of the City is evidanoed by oily resolution attached to the City of Dentan's apptloallan for amendment which is already on file with the Texas Water Commission. 1 , Lloyd smell, CRY Manager J 1 I GUe8CRIBRD AND SWORN TO e9EOFt11 ME, this the day of i August, 1089, to artiy which witness my hand and seal of office. Notary Pubiia n a for the steps a Texas irid xplratlan Date at"'s Printed Rstrna r fltJG 22 'B9 03 1 23 LAW OMC[5 BOOTH 8t. NEWSOM A ~ ITY C84TREIC'N qW 616 CONORES5 AVENUE AUSTIN. TV0 78701.2443 9121478.9506 rAX•912.473.2115 SM10 L. ?M RATRIC'K 7. SUL11VAN DOM FRANK R.) NtW$ SUSAN R. K" A. D, (SKIP LTNDNM CAROLYN AlNSS PATRICx BRAWN ROWN AUguSt 22, 1989 KUTH A. PARNEi MOTW M. B ANN a. DILLUN M C CFHAU L L IALL 1 600N I AMLS W. IO4INFTON vim Pa"Imb Mr, Howard Martin Denton Municipal UtINN 215 E. MaICSnnsyy 1 Denton, Texas ` 6201 "am, ~4pplloatlort to Amend obArtso iHydroNde aio dProje t No.08.23311; Lake Rey R , (City of Denton) ; i E I Dear Howard. r se cause of time pressures, I have drafted a separate letter in response to item 1 regiment to non- 1 of the Texas Water Commission's request listil aU egards t cn iu co M for a r le pdorhy authorization, rather than wafting unt j response letter. the slttaohed taoel0is, or, foraby have the Ireterretypsd in Either pphotoC4ppYy -om, K signed original PsWO to Denton, for Mr, Harres slgnature beefore a notary pu ex resosd to me In time for filing on Fddhy with the xtirer M90 0e14 ~0ted. If this do s not give you o"Ough t1me, we a" r0uw please call me If you have any questlaft Sincerely, lie f Carolyn rene attsohrnerd CkmwA 5102 V,r sr:ry AUG 22 189 93128 I i LAW OPftCFS I BOOTH & NEWSOM A rR0 $SrQNAL MRPORATIpN i J9W FJRST CJ7'Y C1iNTR o 816 CONORESS AMUI: AUSTIN, TEXAS 7870w4J3 SIt•;78.9JOb fxANK R. 9O0'r}J PAX-512.473,11 IS R. I). ISKIM NEWSOM PATR4X W. 11NUNER SHERRY L. nEl TIMOTHY L, SAa* N PATR ICK J. SJ UIVA N MICHAEL 1. 600TH SUSAN I.PJTTS CAROLYN AHRENS I 'COVER allapT Kltnt A. AIR01,1I' ANN O, IRLLON JAMES W. OINSTON Date: 4 ~zr~4 I r i ~ 1 E T0;~. `N~,t,►Jaa.c~. i COMPANY: acar. h~u,fA631 FAX i : FROM MESSAGE: i Copies T0: ! f i i NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: t , 4 . ld»ms tk t{rA5}'i S~ ELECTRIC DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES WATER j WASTEWATER TEL.ECOPY COVER SFEET 50 August 24, 1989 Charge to Account M Date edge(s) Plus one cover Page we are transmitting TC Booth - Name ke - Company Fax Number - III i E FRGM t C Name aob Neleo~t w._r..1_..~--•w Company Denton Munia I city, State _ Demon-.- a 4.8..~ 2 Phone Number .,.5817 56b~82 an problems with this transmission, please call [ t there are y or contact the loilowingt i Renton Municipal Utliitkea f f, 215 E. McKin7620t j Dentonp Texas (817)7)566-1 , 3b Fax e (81 5662 CITY OF OENTCN - DEDICATED To a-IAL.ITY SERVICE t i (j ~Lf 1 CITY of OENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 762011 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES f DATE: June 28, 1989 TOt File- Lewisville/RR Lake Information Exchange Committee f FROM: A.E. Nelson, Exec. Director of Utilities I ! REs Meeting with Corps 6/28/89 iJ Lewisville @ 532' Ray Roberts @ 628' - 85% Full j ' 1. Now releasing 3,700 ac, ft/sec. from Lewisville j I (1,642,800 gals. per min); with Grapevine discharge, releasing over 7,000 ac. feet/second; if keep releasing will reach operable level of 526' @ Lewisville on July 23rd. Will get to 522' by August { 11th. t 2. Lewisville Lake is now closed since all facilities j are 5' under water. Will not open Lewisville until , several weeks after August 11th to allow drying out and will need to perform some maintenance of ' recreational facilities; may be Labor Day before I parks are open. 3. Lewisville bake construction projects; Spence Construction) 50% complete due to complete by I September 1989 but with weather and water will not j finish by 9/89. : 5 4. on 5/12/89 contract awarded Hickory Creek Park construction contract) due to complete by April 1990, i i 5. Ray Roberts: t Boundary area delineation contract, i.e., fences, awarded 4/14/89 - due to complete 8/90 Contract 1121 Isle Du Hois Park contract opened bids 4/891 bids under contest7771 due to complete January 1991. i Contract {J_3: v DEI72CF.TET] TC~ QtJA.LSTY SERVICE s , Jordan, Buck Creek, Sanger access and other access 8 points d and t Johnson Branch bids to open 7/13/89; award Pecan Creek and Sanger Access should be open by January 1, 1990. Wetlands groject has been delayed. Top of wetlands dikes was planned @ 528' which is now level of lake, Corps has requested Denton and Dallas to discharge 166,000 acre feet of water from Ray Roberts wetlands can be built. Denton and Dallas have firmly E refused to release this water. ~ r 6. Lewisville Hydro-3,000 KW -Turbine is being completed. -Generator is in stock -Construction design is complete. -Still trying to iron out detail- with Corps for approval. I -Hope to get construction started within 3 months operational by summer 1990. 7, Ray Roberts Hydro j -Turbine/generator contract awarded early this year. -Design of power house underway. -Will be presenting to Corps for approval. { -Hope to be eonst, by Feb/Mar 1990 with completion by summer 1991. ' 8. Ray Roberts Water Plant F -Denton plans water plant on 78 acres just west of Corps' Resident Engineer office. -Process design report finished and will be presented to board. i I i f d .i 9. Bill Cotton- Planning Department Greenbelt Project -Originally, Sycamore Park on Lake Lewisville was proposed. Would have required 2900 acres of land. -1st cost was estimated @ $4,180,0001 508 to be paid by corps, 37.58 by Dallas, 138 by Denton; annual 0&M cost of $256,000 was to have been paid by Denton (268) and Dallas (748). j - Greenbelt Proposal as an alternate to Sycamore Park -600 acres of fee simple land; conversion of 400 J acres of flood easement and 500 acres of ! cons ervation acres. -1st cost $3,270,0001 37.5$- Corpst 9.75% f Denton, 27.758 Dallas and 258 State; annual 0&M ( $52,300/year which state will pays -Post authorization report presented in 1984. ;Chief -Chief agreed and sent to Secretary of the Army to proceed) forwarded to Congress; has j verbal support from both Texas Senators and several Congressmen; is awaiting congressional { bill and approval. Starting in 1986, Congress will only have water appropriation bill each two years; therefore, may not get Greenbelt through congress until 1990 if it has to wait on the 1990 water appropriations bill. Some congressional staff are trying to get attached to some other bill. Until final decision, Sycamore Hasid project is on hold, at least until 1990. F 10. Jim , Area Manager, Texas Parks & Wildlife, Mgr. of Fish/Wildlife at Ray Roberts f -Have license with Corps to operate Ray Roberts lands as a Type ri Wildlife Hunting program. Cost of a permit is $35/year, + -After hunting season is over, TPWD, visits with 50% I of hunters to find out results, returns a portion to areas, in 1989 turned back $47,000 for wildlife habitation enhancement to Ray Roberts. -In 1987, 508 of all water fowl of all the States Type II permit was harvested at Ray Roberts. t i; :f A 1. }L [:3f -riS_d ,j (4 -In 1988, Ray Roberts was best type II land in State. -In 1988, 691 hunters harvested 3600 ducks at Ray Roberts - an average of 5 per hunter. -In Quail, Ray Roberts was 2nd in Stater 1100 hunters harvested 6300 quail. -Dove hunting on Ray Roberts was also very good in 1988. -All forms of hunting should be good £or 1989 also. -TPWD has been planting several sites into corn) 67 acres this year, as feed crop for waterfowl. Plant in 75' strips and then leave strips where wheat will be planted in late summer. Corn will be left until after hunting season, then will be mowed down and 4 prepared for next year's planting; preparing an 4 additional 190 acres for wheat planting. ~ I ! -Last year had 26,000 acres of Ray Roberts lands in Type II hunting program; 1989 will be 33,000 and 1990 will have all 43,000 acres. Can sign up a, local law enforcement office. Game Warden office in Ft. Worth also has permits. ! -Areas north of Hwy 402 will be a waterfowl sanctuary area., -TPWD has done some "half-cutting" of mesquite tree I branches wherein several branches of a tree are half { f way broken and continue to grow near the ground, thereby allowing added ground shelter for wildlife. -Have installed many bluebird nesting boxes and wood duck nesting areas) plowed 600 acres this year to get weeds, especially sunflowers, to grow to provide food for wildlife. ; il. Col. Shufulberger -17th May 1949 flood in Ft. Worth resulted in creation of Ft. Worth Corps District in 1950. -On 17th May 1989, exactly 40 ears later Y Y flood came againmastl in the { , mostly Dallas area. -Estimate the Dallas May 17th flood was a 75 year flood oceurence. -Lewisville level rose 24 feet from December 1988 to Jvne 1989. -Ray Roberts level rose 35 feet from December 1988 to rA10'61 105;. Y.4rC pRpR ~ . June 1989. -corps estimates that over $200,000,000 of flooding damage was prevente this year by the area dams, Nelson, Execut ve D rector I Department of Utilities I j f ~ ~ I 9CriRRLL.MTo,005 l w 'V 1 lr :l?"hl '~er;.N>`-1~ I U F PL•]n.Y ! 1 a~ wev~ } JAN 1919899 011T U FN r 1 ti CITY M4AOENS OFFICE CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 6668200 a , OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES I!BlIOR11NDUA1 j DATE: January 19, 1989 f TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager Chairman and Members of the Public Utilities Board f FROM: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities i RE: Greenbelt Project { Attached please find a copy of a letter from the Asst. Secretary of Army, Robert Page, to House Speaker, Jim Wright, I requesting legislation authorizing exprinditure of funds for the Greenbelt project. We are not certain of the purpose, meaning or impact of the last sentence, third paragraph, ! regarding "...future development of recreation at Lewisville j I not to be a Federal responsibility..". Dallas is researching this, and z have asked our Legal Department to also research this. At any rate, it looks like something will happen on the Greenbelt this year! I Respectf 1 , { [E. Nelson, P.E. Executive Director of Utilities { gor ccc Ham, David/Tullos, Ernie PTS:Disk001:01/19/89 Grenbelt 1 E -s { DED2C'.ATFD '~'Q QUAL,~TX' S~~V2C~: i t, A qr; x ~111pAMfl "7J : NQPpx tY3d34.II{, pYap$ I{hj JA I~ I ' N DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY `A 3 IX. FORT WORTH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 4 P. O. BOX 17300 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 70102.0300 I.` REFIY TO j' AITENTION OF: ¢ January 12, 1989 1 I a , Planning Division E f 1 Mr, Bob Nelson j Director of Utilities Attention: Mr. [toward Martin City of Denton Municipal Building I Y Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr. Nelson) t Enclosed for your information is a copy of a letter dated December 8, 1988, from the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) to the Speaker of the [louse of Reprasentatives. This letter transmits the Chief of Engineers' report on the Greenbelt at Ray Roberts Lake to Congress for authorization. Please feel free to give me a call at (817) 334-2095 if you have questions concerning the enclosure. { Sincerely, Paul M. Hathorn, Chief Environmental Resources Branch Enclosure i E i E i k JAN 10 49 19156 USAED-5W D'LTX P.04 d:1+A11''MY(V l Uf I M~ Mr<rn r j I 00FICC of THE A41IIITANT 110"C "Pty WAONINOYOR, OC $OSIO-OV00 000* r hanorsbU 'Janes C. Wright, Jc, DEC t999 speaker of the RouNt of aepresenrativati Washington, Da C. 205t5 Door Mr, spssk491 mimed on the oonatruction authority for a modification to the authorized Trinity liver projects, (section 101 of the River and Harbor hot of 1965, public Lew 99498), the Army Chief of snginearm has provided to this office a special report and recommendations to construct a greenbelt corridor between ley Roberts Dam and Lewisville Lake, Taxasl in lieu of authorizad traditional recreation features at Lewisville Lake, together with other pertinent sports. i have reviewed the report and recommendation of the Chief of inginsera, along with views of the State of Texas, .he Departments of the interior and dousing and Urban Development, the Environmental Protection Agency I and the raderal Emergency Management Agenoyl which are set forth in the enolomed oommunicationsa f This modification is beyond the disoxetionavy t authority of the Depfirtsaent of the Armyl therefore, i specific Congressional action i■ required. %send on this review, on behalf of the ssoxetsry of the Army, i recommend congressional modification of the project for j the greenbelt corridor plan, in order to avoid duplicate Federal Contributions to recreation facili- ties, this recomaor►dition 10' subject to including a clause in the implementing 14041 aost"sharinq agreessnk, which makes future recreational development at i Lewisville Lake a non-irederal 104ponsibility antic an amount equal to the amount of the raderal share of the greenbelt substitution has been expanded. The Office of Management and Budget advises that ,the reoowsndation is in accord with the Mmidentl■ program, copy of its letter to enclosed. " . sinoaral;Y, i Robert Va Page Assistant 940ratary of the uoy '(Civil works) ti - hook he !w! ~ Mnclotuae ta, ra.a,, a r. tiny Lilt dol 24 owl W-r Y Y 4i i, 2628L RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE APPLICATION WITH THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION FOR, AND TO TAKE SUCH OTHER ACTIONS AS ARE NECESSARY TO OBTAIN AUTHORIZATION UNDER STATE LAW TO USE WATER FROM LAKE RAY ROBERTS AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton is the owner of Certificate of ( Adjudication No. 08-2335 issued by the Texas Water Commission I authorizing the storage of 207,896 acre-feet of water in Lake Ray Roberts, and the diversion of same per annum for municipal and domestic use; and WHEREAS, Lake Ray Roberts and the dam creating it are owned by the United States of America and operated by the Corps of Engineers; and I WHEREAS, the Corps of Engineers has consented to the installation and operation by the City of Denton of facilities in the dam; and I hydroelectric j I WHEREAS, the City of Denton has obtained License No. 3939 } 1 from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission authorizing the I City to install and operate hydroelectric facilities in Lake Ray Roberts dam; and 1 J WHEREAS, it has been determined that the installation and operation of hydroelectric facilities at the Lake Ray Roberts dam is in the beat interest of the City of Denton; and 1 WHEREAS, State law requires authorization from the Texas Water Commission for the use of water for hydroelectric power generation; NOW, THEREFORE, j BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager, is f authorized `Ty the City of Denton to file application with the j Texas Water Commission for, and to take such other actions as i are necessary to obtain authorization under State law to use water from Lake Ray Roberts for the generation of hydroelectric power and purposes incidental thereto. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. j t ~ i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1989. RAY STEPHgNS$ MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFM WALTERS~ CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM. DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHp CITY ATTORNEY BY, „Ntlp){ } laq~ ~1•{.ah:.J1 ~ r it r ~ 1 G TEXAS WATER COMMISSION P. 0. BOX 13087 Austin, Texas 78711.3087 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF ADJUDICATION NO. 08.2335 (Section 11.121, Texas Water Code) 1. PERSONAL DATA OF APPLICANT: i A. Name: City of Denton 8, Mailing Address: 215 East McKinney, Denton, Texas 76201 C. Tale. Nos.: OfflCS (817) 588-8230; After b p.m. (817) 566.8250 D. Social Security or Federal tD No'; N/A 2. DAM, RESERVOIR AND WATERCOURSE DATA: j A. Type of Storage Reservoir: existing on channel reservoir as i authorized by Certificate of Adjudication Number 08.2335, B. Structure/Dlrect Diversion: 1 i 1. Watercourse: Elm Fork, Trinity River 2. Basin: Trinity River Basin 3. Reservoir: Lako Ray Roberts 4. County. Denton i yyy. ./:lieoiSl ~ _i L:YI "4 ~I 1 C. Reservolr: See Certificate of Adjudication No. 08.2335. D. U.S. Soft Conservation Service Struoturs: N/A E. Drainage Area: N/A E 3. APPROPRIATION REMIEST: A. Appropriated water will be used as follows: 1. Purpose: Hydroelectric power generation 2. Place of Use: Outlet works and [stilling basin 3. Acre-Feet per annum: 235,338 i I 4. Comment: Water appropriated under this certificate E ~ amendment will be released by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers through the low flow outlet of Ray Roberts dam for no nconsumptive, hydroelectric power gensration. Certificate of Adjudication No. 08.2335 authorizes aPProprlatlcn of 207,898 acre-feet by the ~ ChY of Denton and Certificate of Adjudication No. 08-2455, as amended f authorizes an annual appropriation of 591,704 acre-feet by the City of Dallas, both from Lake Ray Roberts. To the applicant's knowledge, there are no outstanding hydroelectric rights on any of the water rights represented by these two certificates. The requested appropriation of ' 235,338 acre-foot corresponds to the maxin:um capacity of i j , S~.rT:Ji bl ' Iti i the turbine planned for installation by applicant, The proposed Installation and use of the generating facilities will not necessitate any modification of permitted maximum r release rates, f S. Diverslin: 1. Location of point of diversion 43,1 N o 290 W (bearing) 1,987 feet (distance) from the southeast corner of Martha Langston Origlnat Survey No. N/A, I Abstract No, 739 , Denton County, Texas. E 2. Location from nearby town: See Certificate of ' Adjudication No, 08.2336, I 1 ~ 3. The diversion will be: from an existing on-channel i reservoir, i 4. Rate of Diversion: a. Maximum: 129,111 gpm i i b. Diversion facility: i 1. Number of turbines: 1 I { 2. Type of turbine: 3. Turbine capacity: 145870.08 qpm { (326 cfs) i h S. Comment., Exhibit F• i of the City of Denton's application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a license for a Minor Water Power Project is attached to illustrate the locatlon and distance of the proposed diversion. Low-flow releases from Lake Ray Roberts are presently passed through a 5-foot diameter steel pipe, and discharged through the low-flow outlet portal. Addition of the proposed turbine for hydroelectric development will entail the connection of a 6-foot diameter welded steel pipe to the blind flange bifurcation on the low-flow conduit. A 175-foot section of the Voot diameter steel pipe wfll be connected to the turbine, located about 30 feet fmm.the side of the [planned } stilling basin). The proposed Lake Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project will Inolude I one horizontal-shaft propeller turbine with a discharge wipacity of approximately 325 cubic feet per second (cfe). When reservoir release rates must exceed turbine discharge capacity, water can j be simultaneously passed through the hydraulic turbine and the existing low-flow outlet portal,, ES C. Return water or Return Flow: I . Water which is diverted but not consumed as a result of the above stated use will be returned to Elm Fork, tributary of Trinity River , tributary of Trinity River, i i Basin, (point out no water will be used), , 2. Comment: A taltrace will extend about 400 feet downstream from the turbine draft I tube running parallel to the j ! (atilting basin), to the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, (Add environmental statemsnt), D, Surplus Water: N/A 4• GENERAL INFORMATION: I 4 A. The proposed works will be located on the rand of the j United States managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, whose mailing address to p.O, Box 17300, Fort Worth, Texas, 78102. B. Irrigation: N/A 1 C. If the application for the appropriation Is granted in t whole or to part, construction works will be begun by March 20, 1969. The proposed work will be completed within two years of the date of Issuance of the amendment. I i D. A Conservation Plan Is E. (1) Inter-watershed transfer: N/A (2) Transbasln Diversion: N/A i r ? S. Maps, plats, plans, and drawling accompany this application as required by applicable TAC Sections. j 6. Multiple dams and reservoirs, diversion points, return points, f i r w I etc.: N/A f See attached Resolution No. . authorizing Application. Subscribed and sworn to as being true and correct before me on this the day of less. Notary Pubila, State of Texss i H <f , fi All, i (1~(Ufl``dJAI C I'f Y l' 1,' G6, O ~i'H; F July 2989 Real Estate Divls#on SUNJE'Crr Pro Pasrd lease, Pond Creek P%cceiS Arr.a~ City of Sanger ! lake, Texas Roberts pay 1 i Mr. John Hamilton w~f C1ty l~ananer Of of Sanger ~f- Pott Office pox 579 Sangert Texas 76266 ~ Dar itr. HeGlliLonr Th1s is 1n further rrpiy to your Prevfous oorres requestin a Park lease over the Pond C pondenco Roberts lake. reek Access Area at Ray Sun our cost"aluent to your +'e4ue. we havw discussed this natter with llenton. They have stated for the project, the Cities of Dallas and 1 executed betvmen that they would not agree their investrunt the In corps of Engineers and the it a lease 'being Pond Creak the site. Therefore y,~ es~st Y of Sanger due to Access Area to Dallas And Kenton. Proceed to lease "ties would consider subleasing the say to San it sh to "Proach the►r with sack a possible that the Proposal. ou)d you wish a 01'rItOn to Your wl Othor alternative would be for the Cities of 041143 and Area Access Year bill hefng Map AcedacoatraCtu n Partners far tha Pond Creek lfabf ty Would than he o ally by the Cft of Banner of recreation development of the Pay fifty rcent r5} of the c cost fifty (60) years. It 1s estimated at the praent~0"t Pe the cast-sharfny Portion of the Period being I S24o,5pp. development cost would be a that pProxla+ately Should you have an staff at (817) 3.t4-1043.quvstions~ Please contact Larry ihrll of hg. 5lncerely~ Janes P. Cain Chiefs, Real Estate Division r-~ u tAi Yir~ Copies furnished; Mr, Michael K. Tubbs Director of Dallas Water Utilities Cityy Nall Dallssr 'texas 75277 br. R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities City of Denton Deoton, Texas 76201 r . 4 i 4 F i l ,t if ii `I 4 W IE !E Y I j t+~ I 0 F s I i ~ Fl L fE