HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-21-1990
p~
3
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
August 21, 1990
r/ .fM
Flack Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday.
August 21, 1990, at 5:15 p.m, in the Civil Defense lloom of City
Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Vixas at which the following
items will be considered:
Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be considered as pact of the Agenda for the
Regular Meeting.
5:15 p.m.
1. Staff Budget Presentations
5:15 - 5:45 A. Financial/information Services
Finance Administration/Risk Management
Accounting/Customer
Service/Purchasing/Warehouse
Treasury/Municipal Court./Tax
Information Services/Word Processing
5:45 - 6:15 B. Electric Utilities
I
6:15 - 6:35 C. Water Utilities i
6:35 6:55 D. Wastewater Utilities
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
August 21, 1990, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following
items will be considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the minutes of regular session of
July 17, 1990.
2. Yard of the Month Presentations for August.
`J 3. Consider approval of a resolution supporting the
expansion of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport.
i
I
I
`I Y'„ice
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 21, 1990
Page 2
4. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
r approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
Listed below are bids and purchas( orders to be
approved for payment under the Ordinance Section of the
G a5;enda. Detailed back.-up information is attached to the
ordinances (Agenda items S.A. 5.B, S.C, S.D.. S.E.). This
listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council
Members to discuss any item prior to approvdl of the ordinance.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid #1116 - Street Sweeper
2. Bid 01130 - CRTs Controller, Printer System
3. Bid 01131 - Maintenance of PC and Related
Equipment
4. Bid 01133 - Padmounted Capacitor Banks
5. Bid #1128 - Alexander Drainage
6. Bid 01132 - West Oak Paving and Drainage
7. P.O. #98817 - American Management System
I 8. 11.0. #98818 - IBM
I 9. P.O. #98813 - Eastern Electric
10. Bid 41069 - Change Order for Oak Hickory &
Fry Paving and Drainage
5. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
J contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services. (4.A.1. - Bid
01116, 4.A.2. - Bid 41130, 4.A.3 - Bid 01131,
4.A.4. - Bid 01133)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for public works or improvements.
(4.A.S. - Bit 41128, 4.A.6. - Bid #1132)
I
r
'l
I
1 k
x
City of renton City Council Agenda
August 21, 1990
Page 3
I
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids. (4.A.9. P.O. #98813)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
execution of a change order to a contract between
the City of Denton and Jagoe Public Construction;
` and providing for an increase in the contract
I price. (4.A.10. - Bid !#1069)
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for purchases of
materials or equipment which are available from
one source in accordance with the provisions of
state law exempting such purchases from
requirements of competitive bids. (4.A.7. - P.O.
#98817, 4.A.0. - P.O. 098810)
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Sec.
3-14 of Chapter 3 (Airports and Aircraft) of the
Code of ordinances, by prohibiting the operation
of ultra-light aircraft on the City of Denton
Municipal Airport and within the e0 ablished
traffic patterns of the City of Denton Municipal
Airport; containing findings of facts; providing
that any person violating the terms of this
ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor
and upon conviction shall be fined ).n any sum not
more than two hundred dollars ($200.00); and
providing for an effective date hereof. (The
Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.)
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of
Denton approving the 1990 Appraisal Roll as
certified by the Appraisal Review Board and
submitted by the Donton Central Appraisal
District.
J 6. Resolutions
A. Consider approval of a resolution adopting the
1991-1995 Capital Improvement Plan. (The
Planning and Zoning commission recommends
epproval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 21, 1990
Page 4
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing
condemnation of real property necessary for the
construction of drainage improvements near Willow
Springs Drive.
C. Consider approval of a resolution adopting a
revised investment policy for the City of Denton
to replace the existing investment policy. (The
Investment Committee recommends approval.)
7. Consider approval of a revised policy regarding
candidate water and sewer 11nes. (The Public
Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommend approval.)
8. Consider approval of a request by Forest Hill 02 Water
Supply Corporation to receive a Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity for water service. (The
Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
A. Monthly Budget Update
10. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Heal Estate
I C. Personnel
U. Board Appointments
11. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
12. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters - Under Sec„ 2(0), Art. 6252-17
r V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g),
Art 6252-17 V,A.T.S.
I
I
I
I
f
r ]■5ls
I
City of Donton City Council Agenda
August 21, 1990
Page 5
NOTE; THE CITY COUNCIL, RESERVES THE HICHT TO ADJOURN INTO
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT
IS IEGALLY PERMISSIBLE.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City llall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 090 at o'clock
CITY SECRETARY
32@7C
i t
I
i
,P
1v o'nP.~
_7 M
r Y.L.
CITY
COUNCIL
Y
v
-
V
i
0 ~~VUOL
0} D~
j Off: o
9
x-E
Q
mx'
f G
GCUI
i
r.
I
..tt yt.t~ t . t
i ypsJ
If
f
I ~^r
v si , v y
4CIT
COUNCIL
1
11:T= T:
I~
I
I --MIX.
TI.
F
TIMIM.
1
I
M T
1 f
C
0} D~ W
t4OQ r0 Ov
' 0 M Is 0(~0
~ rs
k
North Tcxas Commission -DFW International Airport
_ Expansion Ta_ sk Force
August 91 1990
Daft 7.o
The Non, Bob Castleberry '0""'C`*
CAOYrtw3 OW.H.M A CEO
Mayor of Denton ra*Cao-0*4
215 East. McKinney ronwo1ft1av
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mayor Castleberryi
The Dallas/Fort W)rth International Airport is currently proposing axpansion
of existing facilities in order to acoamndate the anticipated growth in air
travel in the Forth Taxas area and beyond far into the year 2000. As Mayor of
the Tam of Addison and Co-Chairwa of the bMlM11 Expansion Task Force North
Texes Cities and Chnnbars of Catmar+ce Coordinating CortmCttee, I asp acutely
aware of the significance an efficient airport has on aceat and
a sound economic stricture far a growing oam wdty. DEW Ai port is themaintaining
economic engine that drives the mttnplex and we nFed your help to maintain
its calpetltiveness.
We, as a region, uue: join together to support responsible gwdh at DEW
Airport. It is esFential that each city goverment in the North 4ixas arse
act mr+ to adopt resolutions in support of the Dallas/Fort Worth International
Airport, The inpact of these resolutions cannot be undeavathmtsd.
Please consider this a formal request to place the oxleiderat.ion of a
resolution in support of the DEW expansion on your anenda. 7lw attached
materiels should answer nest o: your questions reganting NTC/DFW Expansion
Task Force activities. We are eager to have you and your oamunity involved
in these activities.
If you believe that a presentation by the task force would be aprxopricte
please contact nrs at (214) 450-7026, or Sherry Dutdin of the Me staff at
(214) 621-0400.
The support of A.U oasunnitlss is aruotel to the euaoess of this effort.
Pleme act now.
s
Spruill
r
CiS ~ do
attachYllent8 Additou: P0, 6ox610166 0FW Npat, loxes 76261 rolophono: Motto (214)621CH00
1
i
k Us Id 9u 15:uu U.'i4 9 W oV16 \1a. ZQuZ
I
71
i
Questions&
ears
AIRPORT EXPANSION LN'FORMATIUN
ftpc7 o%~m amv DPW ria et Zbe etrpms (wwuyx gully =Zed for 13 re=laer end m+ay Betweea 1971.93, bud ttatCc
lams,ooalAirpmtaado2a wcsuvodmcm).nor tof more cmrlcmad aitnreft melate- aDFWgrew by 123por,.ea4
meomu drococut the Nwb the loads would come from pd. Dena ddufts. compmd with a 14 percent hr
Texan elioo brave Liked many Vera Iavemcem by the ranters Ito C%1&41 muterp'vu 4130 arr_se to the wive plod Ill ~
Irpmnm quWx3 duru:l the No local ux doLL s woad be provided for in cut side =eel Atlanta And in 1989, DFW arr-
Eavhoameau)Imp=Souernm Coodcd. avianaarawly end two won pined Adarmits the=m-scl
MS)proeeaeboetttc7vpeted Rmweyl04Lproposed tdeShWtTWcfCodIi-A l ekeaftcpaadoolhudled.
eaparsioc of de 1:pom to be opemdosal to 1992, would ('STOW iVDws) s in typavai- Wlrhomt hdptovemoxmt sttd- i,
CFW Abyort L mmmlrtsd to be I300 faCS and bave &a err manly the same Im4dom U the In show DFW mqy become u 7
proviuj flow and thaoulh ea-Mnt apabWty. The ruawry proposed new rmwayt cvnswod u aspou in tLinlo,
Luc an m ell gwdons. In- wRl be used mdnly for art mater Some ®ptovemrnu locluded Now Yolk Wuhinlmo, D.G
c uded here am aaswee to meat' eaival+u well u lah.%:s Lad to do ori/Lal ma$W pLa in no and Atlanta Wither addedeepa. ~
E of the most dwgae.,dy ailed depernm by temmiw. type looser needed a otisic aRy Lid City, DFW wads to lose in com•
garndoce. fafamuc0a L divided a renfb Tor ba!et ehrrntc wW use oat b"m svieriea denifte peddw adnomp ovui:$er
btu ibe foRowSa j Catetmirwt thls rwtway u L reliever for the have Chanted drtmadraRy e= a
Bedtpamrd,Need farExpusion, Main aortb/southrunways0au the&xmutterpluwuadopted. Studf~atheFederal Avfa- e
Safety, Nose, MWpdm Alms u-needed b ode, the rmwey L Of the airport M build 4 thu 60a Adm1c' radon CFAA,1, the
udva end Cancel btfawadoa not crmc ed to be mcd by any the od8jW mane plan Caw DFW staff and bi&Wy quallHed
*0-0dwdnsdme:atenight for, the0ostarlywould ezcmd oaWdecoasuhuuhave !ad&
Ileum e7 of the lmprwemema enasady pe-Zeady coed uded tine DPW
"STbot eauxly y bean 1 pro- A second rawly, 16/34W, is yrarw fat DFW,) most be expeade .
pored In the slrpart tqumkn F opoted for the wm ride of the The odlind mute p'um wu
propamf' ahym4beeomialopendocelta 8good behania} 15utinwu
V 1997. It would be 9910' he apymved befoe the Lidlae Ldas.
As p Cat oft aomprrheaslve Mr• lcnph end its one L expected to try wu dmepL«d ha 1971. To-
port Deveiopmeot Pan. DPW is be slm9ar n 16f146. day, it to uwamtW dot DFW be
props i! to ~ o+o now Comb. Tina new raoxxye as sal. dovdcped and apaaded to e.
Muth {
I uth seaways, ode on the Case LJrad M Cost Core Chad 5200 aaln wmpeci ve led to adapt to
side of the i.tpom the other on nWiod. indmny chortles bmu5ht about
the war 0& Other demean of Amman Aidiaes, which is by dme5otaden- IVUE a"
i' 2p
j
the A~ include: besdgovmed u DFW', end Fandammmlly, in wow AN W be axd7"
sri Delia Ah Ilea, the other mglotr print for dda, ahpasts end otber
'trays hub nude a DPW, also an pm- mk;,w pahlle mddes am subject The 9"% *10115m ad the FM
• rodCdP of the lb?='l p doam5 to improv m to cbnng, for a
fbr the 60 mij- dcseeipood yrwAachs
tb i F~
t 'twin: ~ Placates Car Ily 4FAU e 9 MILTM Fi WLS fin 9t.. needed n DFw whCe: mk r
service usu. ed ls the IML Coddder how sow hooms. Under rho pro-
Overa the ADP Calls for out of dun Teua' hdoway rya. posed ope%ting PkA the new
$3.5 !Wine worth of Lmptovs• o•n would be if the mans pten runways wM berated Ply
mono over the Dear 20 ycse, "Why Olm Of t bada't been apdsted tnc the for tk Corder aafvah rod oom•
t ndal tt tw bon the Abpor °d~II Mast File?" to aomramodus form mom' atria smuts end depsi`
Tian Fed m wuo bonds b*. The odghtil DFW Airport Manner mo~mr vehids tmlbc. S1e1a1y, hart While dmv lpreiy wM be
ed by the sfdlna led tavatemt6m pLe CAW for a sad of Cmc rm- DFW's plan mum be updued t0 Condone *be air a dme Llec
threat' bon the tldinathem- * y a some natty tour miler meet preum end fumm dcmanda wW an Rdawsys 1634 Sae and
seNst Abort 513 biMod would foal to hmd)o Lrp aywsoaic Thu DFW z OdSUW Wm fa depaoaa, this in Is
be Vexonmamod-aeefwci. asap lbwaft 7hopLaWo ladedehpae&"4mmteed Pmjeesed Ddaye2.3%-
to pa"m for eodaty 20 yard is
tsatmcm to the a ccrZont ylw
mad the pemeded DFW's eoa• "Wkl haul of 111duded u
asuedoC a m or Sopk 10 the xWVkV&
"Dm DFW evilly need two eamtal im"d Sbbnwt4"
II mom mommy TLe Adank no FM's pdmary mlradon is
V' ,depart buttes more Alma tin pwvlde a cafe and emrlmr
dw DTW den wak fewer wisdoa sy whkb anerammu
rypw{JS"
to --dond AtLas's 8amv5Cld la mnadecal mod0a of UAty vj 'Ilse
- 77/.000 tw ua dd Un* p 1n 0~ do cannot qp*" m lea
195/, oampfted with 675,000 m story staode ds mandued by
DFW, 8m the Adatrta abport L,#. DFW has m e or Ass ex-
Reats born s Witt peruootep of Coed ed eR federal laws tad rep-
ddeys, and shpm omcws in boron L dedplel the proposal
Aumm see PLm1i1 W bca mawtyL Tyre M p ooea L dl
smrhe many m relieve same desk mtclud.* with euviroo.
b. ddreeFaleon3estioa medulheaes.
t
I
F
iG 0 U 0
` u5~le aD 15:10 0211 p2p 0910 I c
f Rtpz&S safety, the FM Ted a:tp tat also a planahrg l aw d tmh stage ka6•hs,
i and other fa=m
to togtirod W the mw rua• m to a DFwddldt proprq "M note projeetc no for The Program dun takes in
ways be tcpoeted ftom td4des ad;dcd"'Wex a to . u u to¢ohed iht h4 an we rwmys based on this avu'Abdafamadon m al-
;;nays by it kart 7,000 fat for clear ioors and midsedoo pm- tta pwj4d+d omo-ooe of aakte the disnacs 4om pomu on
sifegr Moons, u rdl as to aL'orv pax ootdr Stays II ■Ir;wft7 VFW the pOM4 sloes sushi parhi foe
for fo%xr omaLsxow udVall.
111A en enema adt¢mte atymsd pandoa "99by an tins dote soots for mppem If Stays 11 tL*vmft an rut nccraft opmulon. Too
that ap~oeehlas a(aQmA w~91 Ise new tttrtwaya amalie ;tarn trot phasd mt7" note Aom each atttaA apetufaa
w not riots Fpwbs oac rich Or fly loo- Ibm wds"t door sons for fie airport mclpdm pan is a aoeotrdated u ash point w
seaasty close m another AP- other trmwaysT" based to the test b,famsdon thoa. e paloa m In goaid with
pr*rjdas LIMMA, eves In in- ney m not. want or cadev'I- available above the typo of ah- oW r
r charms weatber. apt load er DF W Shoald IN a CrA that wm be opemtlni of cumdivlth a liaa;eatlas me
proposed bnyrovrmats u used rhh "dear aadW A DFW ova, Me tun 20 teen The motom far drat upreL a level
VFW d&eu ufeq &M a amts- demi saes Is a ddaaed ants to- Dmlenad cola coamms collect Q~hter oompnur pro-
baps sutrdpofna [tar ettampla ~ed by PAM A clear mod the sirpon's dente to plan far the W= is aril a pw= 0.70
two mars wand mach wm bd "M 300 from the sad of a use of the runways so fltyht war- and 75ldaoanman, On mart
bast to am" maum= Co=m rmmway and m wds 2,500' is ,sous J="R mlalmam Mdse la need aoamos far sao-
altadonroong*ts04. lengib.Anymewr®waysbug%by ttozaamn as ads O&Oada parposes. lheDOWQgosma
aamc coattalim Altbaair not DFW tam bicWc the same the taro hub arch; t DPW waarms in dm averbdd an a
dhct+y pen of the clil iao 2.SOafoot Clan aooe rogtrimd by Duemadoad• Amaias and but ma; wbfeh eomhs std at•
prpjecr, On FM hu Onmmtaed ~ FAA. Dd" , tsar mots the faders In pat's bomdatfa, onaao0ad
o mandates DFWs crabs air J U slots Duman Wastry to pmrbas- pPros tad mduksca anDed n d
teu c0aao1 ryran ever and n irs Qdr+r SupmatQam _
Una few yaws. bos~ins this I' •lbae ouch; pmlea their cuts Ids I,j~ amp= art lope for
llUll
Y UL ~andmain ftmyamo[
New rmways wrl allow 1995. Oiler S age 11 mirctft Gm
qFW m lw abamll opaadoas Clow arses er.r boles phased oat on tsar hrdasay opamdots They a t ft ben rods
Rdetasm c es Aom 1
i'nwta s amopomir and aafdy m roe am a+~"~ ?tk w1N ball. k fats Sage 11 ab•• ova pia fee drcm
a d f vm rte tbpary a slsrdCaas rnasy ?t:' 4 i adz rut no toasts i bulk voila penyendv4a adods.dshbadns
sst,ty oatsidmwaoa is igelL true r w c,.; ~ As oldbot stow to arzommodam
safav L atstmted rhea ah na1S F?• :r,•t. y pssseoss daa+ad t6dy wm oommmaltos
. 1,7W r wu..t~ s : ;`•'?~%1 ""Maly be opdadai ttdr DF97 tai A'~ sear{ ofshots-
delays am Almaeted ee kept to saoa r t w a \ sands of doamt on ad" stAm
tsar abac'am mtdm;n• Afl*m llmdL~ prd aria[ now Stop III tad has rot name than 20 Men-
The ghpu: wM do s patrt *Qdadom b deomatim
poets mtnh-A mare Im- how de rmwals wen be nvri
Dar1•teishbor, pats antad6owrear Work- AdMooa2y.modellerwasdone
,i
tog
bran Catiaos bavC bxn ukcd about rte with the FM tad e in dtoe mbe %.V 4a odor im•
i
Y Qn f' rt it It du a~i DFW, airport. pact rm be. Tbo Draft FM will
"paasroa prOje el It Df W 1a ten runoosl Atrpott is our room* ~ all ms to muldw do-
wmmitmeat to t"•> • son you have aocmota AnWrl m die Raewgy Use Pan fair rfved4am tt "uod w ktOval-
all gaesdoas. TWJ mstsarlal oontataa answers m s to lots rte a dadai r msrq m r rte aasioe by 66 FAA.
moot oat =oWy asked gaeaboars the have cane to to aiepoei lbla pin is deaed m
rl>ro sus tht eirpods cl>izea dafomredon On=
mill whCroB now as stay "may snare arise lmpad odor 1
m dial WrommAls Tm tba Un or"rase7"
Over rile hiss two years, the Board gad the tuff have Rmmq Use Pan wffi be so. [de iy ttooe, l by d w FAA. ncc 1
r~agtdmwd Dmmerous Wcpauiod dtnmdves. The Imil. vtered aatmany or u nade4 ummbtramcud hameft Ara-
able Wbilftadon bas COULtced t:s that the boa uterus and wen be u %U new add rte Depedmtm of RCer
tfve Its to esawad DERV by addha= two taw atawsye me" berodae apamdooal al and Utbm Devefapmeat aw
This arm allow do airp virtually to doubts iu caw std "d rd for mamdy aoae
jty white addmf poly A mledvely SCAU amouae of fall. lgow as use o®toan bar ==j
d fr care i
accurate flea w stabs mud- 24 hoot pedal
bL4o. do*
a mwa major oorpom m mlocadow sod bu0mos op +i was over dam at DFWf" me i
loos to oaf ants, crradag 16tnlly thowasds of jobs for DFW bas done cameo alas and Way wds6ted ao dr¢ trey
our N%M over t o ports 20 ynn awadaadag born m ts6 airport aChave amts %VA taro
andauWOodngoo =mdda daytao Ai with any msjot ttanapaeta jem some t tsldew rds mediating was dare to n~.a
I amp DFW tmfotta• dat>alod me ealsdol weddom -Elm m ealw mondbals wad
and b owners e
' natety wrwTlM b be diaplseed or 1m led. The Sorad tad at to atpoa and a adjaxot netu IzWti paid ltr M sloe i
pQaa mmoddea lbe dam wen be
staff of the ahyoa mcoFdu this faro;. tad we area com• co airyoet be ob)aodw7"
J mimed to bouts sensitive to our deishbat We belim and u a bra fa osmpsdns Tba FAA mgnhad rte a" to
hm SAO sad vau to
the mfdp don PMF= that we haws proposed Is N s m a wmevaiw afksghty rom•
edsb$ 0011M)"
most o 4rebatsiva plan in the Dotmtry. Nalso amour maps war pea Dial ema;ea. The *Pat max
bawd
If yon have addidmd queadom, pleas mR the Acdoo rib a the FAA d thw cio coo- tare kdr No s eerr a Pearson WA m
avmlabtt 6= de e do eructs o af No scale, , and mot j
I Carter a Metro (214) 574-8970, and we wen be sfad ID Was a dua bug wirr otFkW ampa lm 60 for trots i
{ assist yom owaa ]evala of mody all tbawE mvkc&
s on ~ 'shone ladep m bl avfd°°u
I ~ an aeaaas 0e tsar
abom %W atparr emh is Woods, ngwmd drums In dr Vatted
txea tempeaoaa star ny dots Satan tidy *a& on prnJ m 1De
tiyutidoa "a of ibcmft ope• to am m DFW teroasboa rte 1
Loafs 1. ?spats. sdas u dr efrpom fi WWY o[ ontmay
chairtwa operuioa of nab typo rtivd Thad atmsch tar Cannot
DTW Airport Soud and depanma trxFs Oprw Ong afford m dark du nquodm of
r
i
i
I
t
IMMENSENESS
E
I ,
.11 R 4
k us !d du ls.li 0911 did udltl
The Apowlrcrswauh egom max proving domsd
Airport Devel6prnenf Plan cue individXy tad vM coo- and Is tidying m ftmd a MAY or
f Sider emmpensrdng property ova40 sviasoa nee Is In troth
o ram wbo an pc wide dour- Tew duvagb the Nonb Cancel
corset memabla proof mu II& property Taw Couua of Oovttamesa
cfu►strt v210S UY0 W&I O 'M then 25% Aor ever,11hougb DFW scoot-
due to me pmposcd exptmdva aim dw the overall relpow
and not because of orher Acura aviMoa ryc needs to be sx•
paaded the Ahpan Bond kcany
"U i sign en avlpdoo usement 4 temporfok oa7,y foe operulad
w with the airport, don't 10 ve a p DFW u a regoW a4m under
4 0 afl my rtgba'. What bappem it t:uhodudw from the Tern
e tbeWee comoursbtaeese7" Leg,mM
! The ptnpaty owoadrxa hot The tssu of scheduling etriv-
■ tdgalog m W3 kid dgbn when all UZI depumacs a
day o tdltre NAso hapea mad
avlgdo easem®
eoagesda V
The eatemem wm any mt whhla me a o
' m Am the tam tmda which p R ads fir.Wdes .Ads .
grem s may opesue in me prop- Ribs Daobdc;as Pot FW been
eut Da
erty'l sbspeee. If trios ooodf• ill aver h world f i~ao no
ove er
riot ere booatd. Site prvpaty ov
en
owaa grow o bdre no kyal rival and depatms ey0°d wd DFW
MPG scdoa spmst me dtpart, la to. o u&xm ~°g DF
n. m
to orbs
awe =for the 23% euemem ewartt ~ oL FU ~~d d
` PmMchant;,esaldcs ~ab°' ~dSO m somer
&OM aetasi apembns M Oh. ~ retp°°t° w oonmmmer
`I
Ea me scope of the a+emmt mays
~r Eecompocialn Tle eucaad inuA peeks of aadvhy mSoeofs. # I 6 like sop
retndns rvlm the property at the
dme of sde and 4 ttitalmtd on aka 10 0q cha t{e
rzp. uta"Clod tou"1alhowAllwtzkwmeawtnmtadunyAmara t1Odde. ma boos day serve lrmehm
j Auueer MW ..e dh wrule4 D Rawer M • &W Wks" va *WO 1w PA aSmiNre peek ove=VI5g. If
n ev.war at • iaoc esera wlu sew+e nee ova *=a.n t• s far Undo the proposed m;dp• one swuarmt doesn't odiet what
rutromer wears smtba ca•
in ts.g b sae ya+d.a b lau n tuwq L 7e x •!910 ><Impo W b den ptVM bomes bniel vim-die ' sIt ~ wohoe w. ~e~iw•wm o n )xse-w aaaw ~r. u Wow I 'bxw. In
the 0-70 Lin ue s bWsn no
ouw n.e. IS Wahl" IM cus er?kAp" crew to 15% avtpsoa mccoc a nicly WM We the ums In me
Raddaadd pmopaty In ms 7475 &0, badasss.
ode firms oo B, thert ere nom- The mkpdoo per, is hued 14 WWA oa would be pot.
W le tali Moreau, they an not paid on pmpame BOW mpecu. More &U4- and aE property Mal
r u u WUM mmxtben, hoaw m will be ~petta to me 75r UA WIC-au be per-
Thm Is stub
~ I esjcb oh 3a to µmer e. mm in Uses ses en Dad Oaptv+na fot r
dsa u pom 'tile with rWch du sevens tenoaa Fhsr, Runway DPW bee proposed petma
PM =make decfdow chow 104 F would come on be to re
projects soon u the DFW Aftpw 1997. where 141!4 W would nevi ~ Dole moomltdohordtoae if If it 8 m ooow= See
Deaelopmew 19aa, not be opatadoW =d! 1991.
Cltasegnardy, &m %world be M ' k Ae ~t sY~
Qyiag in Led Otx of LFW on the end other
Gem tide five yem or mac be- plopama wm t0ow the tirprar m
r "My borne is eaeae the sb*d fan the tea du rnawaY world tnck rtmwy odirsdott mud
` 50.a the bow b"" mides• be M=*XAL relatd ovisc.
donne. Why ant 841 In- Dozing thu Eve.yeer period, If Odic: ataeeds panmemn
h by the Fav:aomatgl "pPbywt hyena trLan
eluded in the prop=7" a hleba Ma nsp of Step G tyuWlsd
aim nA w01 be adaa the star tm• Import SetameuR it r,1L• 1) trle- PWd hend a Ile Wdidaml
The men wbm miepdoa b way. By L997. evbmRmtw'sy to a awommod cnvh=unw demand sae "Of orwr
proposed wwZy eased beyond 104 W erwid be in operae vtp* 2) >Wrm nnw•Y remit-
e
I the 65 UA oom ur, whtcb L ssv *c, to peat: nap of Sup m dons m aunt woonoce; or Y) Fort War* Me= Ahpw Is
city red u ins bwchmied 1kr Lb,a is expacud to be amsue• isquh ham n of ma mtdga- rpet b> Fmk ut It
atldp+foa PaFWr * Is M WY WOCT. don I tustrly. she !lac mtur ne dawn AddidomMy, beam Run- rasrddpneugu tit trafiret
eomswbae The s hpatwlll wq Idly! B tots! aotbe u in. Lan Mdd toy be"u
aa.mpt no midpu alone yeah. unsc sit rtmwsy, rasa am fewae -Ifty a ~ry crxddwtd baodie dAi ad mom bat
j Domood liars xhaaa posxible cpaedomd aonmama a Is ass alteradiuta ~ a+a0u PWWW lbdad 4~m re-
"Wby umR Apeeimmte bdas It p ~a law more tut- reawayor amt ittB~f to DFw m
boaget out or Aouod•praofed7" DFW hu aoddered asthma Addi6ady. Lon Paid hu
_ . J "Bowan 2SS of lY1r MMi* altamulvu co both this eve and e;pmeityoa stmba end *m m
Die if
q4=04 Is M&0 pea slue for w avtpttlm euemsnt wen ddr of the IkWL As pr• rodo•t Sir altaoe t OMM be-
rytsf; to
proofing
1 1111161 u aoosemy in men loch b4 ce)Q"end adegoatel " ' posed the new rmmwrys WM do DF'W ud tnw1414.
Joni t M&Iewss and Faded DFW ba swd3od oft mWpdm a2vw DFW b vbmdly &able I% TWen Emma lfedt Low FWWs
repwic a. Howson, mat of polls" Ad bapoposed 1% a mu& opuedou white Wq*- AbdIIq b haodlasleddaody
f me to ma Imputed avlpd0a euemem furhoma fa bra a nlutvdy amaE 2-0 of etawr ea aea.
a w sheady hm has food- The 45 Lda 4 pr of whu be W- eddl" Aopa I Ahhwd bolt OW ad
ported n taquhed Bevel In be the sranm peaoaa AmatS duos vmtttta cored Lave ndd wm be eamded to
an m1 hafts of new sit c is hsnme me pow+b In ommarew
. "Why In the &L7M midledag by a m4 w U.S. p&bWt Omar other pun of me R&a at the ak mfHC over me cedes yeses,
man bomw InIftitg than In propams nap from IC-1515. MWW of sp *'ft$ as flign• 3x Deed k Ratswd 14046 4 j
Eulses end Gnpeviwt Isn't wi ddort* ieu mu me 2S% the ley. Immed4ta tmd Rmwsy L&UW
that ud eir to residents Ia bloc peopoeei u DFW. DFW mppa• the daveloF• tolls be usdad to meet demaed In
Ennis and Gropevicir mast dsddldond Atrpaa to the apptmrtmardy W M Y'a►
I
I
I
t ~
I
I
I
I
S US ld pU 19, 13 0l14 9:a upid hrc
~uw
I •u bar t t a a!port the AccardlaS to he FAA WeL
adorn
Maltrtfm7" vadous oW se kg~a im w t viedpn
~ • • ~ • •
A'n7W is pwr4y px• wmmmdry a:w bare smdw tae
nayd u e trmotafy lasted aIr• wnytm wompt aod•uw mo
pm faax ty nav~ortadm mew ID the way.
ahilmna, Mr Dott coocapC!ad Me t%'C012red ! h jj I
ete amd the posei s rvics In met h mlgbt 3'vs: aamdeq tad
MmArjag tand.
'Murcu tam mom promLent, ff `
ar3v An fM tnoenry omwttdoaal rpm `
rwArwed14coaceptaedpea- eprat elopmmc
CUM that am. wm dC,aCad a• `
mt9rdaaa tslryaam dwq•.
pore would be ofwunis or so
MUM m the mdoae aftpwr and •rm't h trus that Lb, west r®• • E • '
abepacetymm." way urwdybmdarrauWC• ,
In tact, the FM p w pact- dear
eluded *w 'beaw
elude old' amass should be Tiodwsy C. trot a:oaway, bs t
t s4m m
Itlbtdtmthervesside of to
i
umdeay. heFotcon.
i u i a
9M.9d gad4s spThe le lar~nt deYadgimal DFWmuter ,
f
gm rlm,.i
per for L be oUlarl m plea wd wQt Caw to ~
g oommascWdsv&Vomtofine
44= P.; acyCopmeat of west aids of DFW
=:Sjae' Drw ahpwe lowed v AAS
m l+
meet ear r® mm oar attar, to -My b Grtpevfae WMwls y0
woo { ! ~
~ U AMPM
rysumaeeda• ? SchrAbdgintalaatutly ; (►wrsatwf
forced not of krvla by Jw jail
The FAA d~raQlnrmewmappergja !Itaa _ mdfa DrpJeaT' _
emote Rzw eras wooW bare to The Caq of Ceup"* bu ex- JI
be bMAy eaUdtLad by ms Fasted cmorm we the toa-
federal sovanmcnt mow door: dA schoai wU rwpea ro
needs boot each as DFW hive, the mawmawsy. The bndpdom
ucoadinl m the FAA, Mace j t'Le (whfeA b Whjea to lpptpraf
modvedcatoeepeadteeira;a b} ftAirpatBoard e4de T~" ~Or'•rrpesKNIFg errerwdae vLdfsgyryet
pare CO meet ptwinF eanemd aoa of DaAu and Foa Watth) 'O"o'ee d de `w0't %"..w
Lv4 Low caov) '
To do so premiw euooamle iwpaKe arod9don sad Wow a ter ryt,.t.,,r w e0we 01 vm d +
,dLqwm j
de MmutWar,mawamu dosafthemiddleuchealmam rWtaaawaaaarUa*WSJ MOinw.yr.+wrYee~mek,,k
a dabbing ehtlor to tens at is these mocoaa abcm Rate and resat •e.et re.e.taar eyterw.r a tt,yyt,g,ra r Dew,
loaaa ha paetestgw m amtsr loco ule9 • depeadamm at abpm h par " Wb he,e'i area bem eta
Ioal rmploymaae If tip mhipdm Flee is aid. Of des avwan economy Ttry lapat t}am LledWttl^ y
eueepdaa dr ataJae maby approved, me Caeprnw bay or not home and qmb,
aaaatkhohs as Rana der6tg Calleyv& reboot bomd arfu maoct sad day malts rata] DFW aQllefil s bare met •hh
d""'d. loa ro meat htasited have ropaaatblllry Nr dedd'atg FWAIN tit 010WA • food uad daead Offs" Offp olawloo•
dmraa• wbethr es wn me id4al a au the odor aaaeoWw of I& A wmmnd7 dTOA FM rep
Advown of wsyp peg. totmd ptwf it To W L the apart woomafa rewaedvrs, ad Imddvl6w 't gees his opt %,041 dsod Cr tact
mcm rhea Sd tzn am many dam tom the °eldtEori
tedwslaobiems cs=ty&OW lm'tatDFWeap hios 0°4y efahfu
ptR p at a dm leEs ptaoeaa
by aa'potafa abu nta saw. PCgadlmt for Ca bends d ~ fmpna to oaradama• mron Absbo
i rm. dta FM p" Meted that Aawkm AbOse ry" ~ia LerID ODOdnme
m mew *A low OF"Madeea
hoe ~w%d ran m The m;dm Noah Taut 11sw "My shodd m e atrpr;,y be to disoa a whidow to Imp ate
b Ma+xs Can that scald well bead[4 kd%dhg Amadraa aAowed lo'dratrpy •Grepa tme'e neat tg am dm e . gioa
et a *P*" Alrlbw Dan and utl the odw Mao skedr
Fat at DFY/Akpon
•'(be ~ ear a JIM pw Is deufwd gees e doad to o po Tipair
Males sa w 4 arapeAm it I" DFW WamKdlon
wppora are trot Ljwdy wmrd e and m few ar Dewy om weld d a mile
and de afiaa appal tart 4 w b*j s wadd lradw Ia ward des aeeka tlmdpropasd ram. r.'..,~jya•'wy sit
WOW= - 20 Car r u cove mem m •is tieµ•d' nalveb lbr soy itaswy I Ow. burns
aar ~,.r rs rr=~le~~ i
FAA report quad. • fo[rmuba srRdn rF aerie, bat he an ah, wren am 6sdaoayeq tad amts Ma.~9f ~4 r w a
by 61 pwd Wawa i to ILt adve DEW.
if go sbfdw dad dpdde to l.4rewft4 me ba0wee 0w icy llomm chose ""'a•
a ft show aid mmas the S74 4M
at a tamest j
loatlm Wlih Mw o
bob ~Qy AdtG
We or ob a * ud desdaatfos thpan acted cc bands boa fa
lt~+h dtvwlmpatawtad{d- arty
tta~ ie tvptld be at t oompeef. )U MV f
*VOW a
tive ttliaw ft W" lIn No aasdva orb" tbacAndt~on mnctly /j/ ~r ~rxu tsar tvPar
` awed gb. WIN me
malmma a ft 14M ad I
The M wodypug ales pm do Nash ow rpo by w ew~ea 6e4
aefd,•Tba vppnrt traald prr dvtq w DFW.
vida Ndr or m oaw4sm bew& wldle h may team dw j
m the tadood ark navaradpR camecds 1 hive dials
qw® $me* phoebes aria positive vooccmb impact
I , Mediae baea wumad the ray- Om t e me0a, da fan is tw uy
pam cc dmdw now" might e.dvlty at rr s deport is impotent
become fatdbfo ohm ewaautti- to the arch W!ujFatt Woad
alsadvhyfitexcaedethsam, warmmdty.
rut trvad, ped'pe is dap yera Fs des pseoo rho roske u d'
2010oberyoed• ■'1pmOrin&Jobambythug
f
I
Y
2969E
RESOLUTION NO.
I
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
SUPPORTING THE EXPANSION OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT.
WHEREAS, the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport has had
substantially positive impact of the total economy of the North
Texas region from its opening in 1974 to the present time; and
WHEREAS, that very positive economic impact has been created
in North Texas because of the outstanding service to the air trav-
eling public of the airlines which serve the airport and the effi-
cient operation of the airport and its support facilities managed
by the Dallas/Fort worth international Airport staffs and
WHEREAS, the Dallas/Fort worth international Airport Board has
determined that adjustments to the original Dallas/Fort Worth
Airport Master Plan in the form of the construction of additional
runways, runway extensions, additional air carrier terminal facil-
ities and roadway improvements will be necessary to maintain the
current level of operating efficiency and, at the same time, permit
additional expansions of air carrier service; and
WHEREAS, the planned improvements to the Dallas/Fort Worth
International Airport will create an immediate economic impact
resulting from 1.5 billion dollars in construction activity, in-
creased direct aviation-related employment on the airport and,
most importantly, the support system absolutely essential for the
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport to continue to function as
the most important economic growth accelerator in North Texas for
the foreseeable futures and
WHEREAS, the Dallas/Fort Worth Airport is a critical factor in
the development of economic opportunities for all citizens of the
Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex and for future generationss NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION 1. Tnat the City Council of the City o.' Denton, Texas,
I hereby wholeheartedly endorses the necessary and practical changes
1 to the Dallas/Fort, Worth International Airport Master Plan as ap-
proved by the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board.
SECTION 11. That the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, encourages its membership of corporations and businesses to
speak out in favor of the planned improvements at the earliest date
possible.
i
SECTION III. That the City Council hereby supports rapid
a ..a comp et on oche required Environmental Impact Studies and be-
ginning of construction of the planned improvements at the ear-
liest date possible,
SECTION IV. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to
forward official copies of this resolution to each member of the
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board, the executive, staff
of the airport, the regional office of the Federal Aviation Admin-
istration and the office of each air carrier serving Dallas/Fort
Worth International Airport.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi-
ately upon is passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1990. ,
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCR, CITY ATTORNEY
BY: LAI-,
I
J
PAGE 2
a..rwa m. ry.~CITY
.COUNCIL
r
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
~ ~1 000; ao V
0
Dods
Vp0~ r o N S ~ O~~,C;.
~~~'JGL~GG4~
1
i
L- 1/3689
NO.
' ORDINANCE ll PURCHASE ACCEPTING
OF N 1ATERIALS T1EQUlPmFNTA,NISUPPLIESN OR SERVICES;
F Olt
PROVIDING FOR TILE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WIlER UAS, the City leas solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
ment supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
WlIER FAS, the City Monnger or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bides for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Bid Proposals submitted therefor; and
WHF,hEAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
materials, equillnent, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
TIIE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PENTON IIEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered
bids -`ror mW H it als, a uipment, supplies, or services, shown in the
Purchasing
"Bid Proponals'' on file in the Office of the City's
Agent filed according to the bid number asaigned thereto, are
` hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids
for such items:
BID ITE11 VENUUIt AMOUtiT ,
NLN1iER _NO_
ll lb ALL EAGLE SPECIALTY BRUSH ,J92.586.00
`1130 ~ AL1. IDEA COURIER $88,200.00
1131 ALL IBM $21,200.00
- _ _ - = $26,054.00
1133 ALL PRIESUR SUPPLY ' - U0
~'ln d G. 140 9 /j,,
1~ y'ItTr'M J e.',f 1.~
■pp71
I
SEC'FlUtl 7.1. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numheHems-of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer
of Litc, persons ,;ubmitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchnso Lice materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance wiLh the terms, specifications, standards quantities
i and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Pro pot; nIs, and related documents.
SLcTI011 Ill. That should the City and persons submitting
appro`vecT--niil"accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to
enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the
acceptance, npproval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager
or his dr_siRnated representative in hereby authorized to execute
the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that
the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, Atandards, quantities and specified sums contained
in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and
accepted.
SECTION 1V. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
number`l*-3.tems- of the submitted bide the CJty CoUleil hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amiunt and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
immeaH ely upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 91990.
130D CASTLEDERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
~I
7ER-141-FF.-RVA1LCEH,CTTY-5 c PTAR
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
J DEBRA ADM{I DRAYOV1TCfl, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
PAGE: TWO
I
K ,vt
DATES August. 21,1990
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 01116 - STREET SWEEP'dR
RECOMHELJDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest
bidder meeting specification, Eagle Specialty Brush, in the
amount of $92,586.00.
SUMMARY- This bid is for the purchase of a vacuum type street
sweeper. -fhe unit recommended is a Johnson Sweeper mounted on a
Ford Chassis. It will replace a Ravo Sweeper that is no longer
economical to repair. The old unit has major mechanical problems
and is badly worn. As of tofiay $75,034.00, has been spent on
maintenance for the 1986 Model Ravo Sweeper. It is currently out
of service and will require an estimated $12,000.00 in engine and
transmission work, to become operable. It is our intent to list
it for sale at the next Surplus Auction schedule for September
18, 1990.
1 The bid offerod by STM Equipment is for an Elgin Whirlwind
Sweeper. It fails to meet the requirement of an in-dash factory
installed air conditioner. The unit they offered is a roof
mounted unit making the entire sweeper too tall and exposing the
air conditioner to tree limbs and other obstacles. By design and
intent, a sweeper operates along curbside. Denton has many
attractive treelined streets that woulLl not be accessible with
the roof mounted air conditioner. Due to heat, noise, and dusty
conditions, an air conditioner cab is essential to the efficient
operation of any street rweeper and greatly contributes to the
health and safety of the operator.
Due to the few dollars difference in the two units meeting
j specification a very complete evaluation was preformed. The
Johnson Sweeper offers a superior warranty, increase fuel
efficiency, on site repairs, engine compartment sealed front
sweeping area, stainless steel water systems and several other
items listed as options on other machines are standard equipment
J on the Johnson Sweepter.
BACKGROUND:Tabulation Sheet (See tab sheet for list of adders and
deducts listed on bids to make machines basically equal for
evaluation process).
1 k\ a 1 K ~'Y'--I11~
yr~asn
I !CG
C1'PY C0JflC1L REPORT
August 21, 1990
Page 2 of 2
DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fleet operation
Department, Diaina- ection of Cosanunity Seiyice Department of
Utility Divi'd on.
FISCAL it•lPAC2': Funds for the purchase of this unit will coCouncil
ation previously approved by
from. Cortificates ui
Motorpool E4 pment.
for the purpose cf purchasing
Respectfully submitted:
L1 V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
c
Nam. - Torn D. Shaw, C.P.1,
Title: Purchasing Agent
Ts/il'
032-DOC
i
i
~I~aw I
S i
BID # 1116
I I
I I j
BID NAME STREET S7dEEPER I AIS I NAYLOR j EAGLE j Sim i
I CONTINENTAL j SUPPLY ` SPECIALTY i EQUIPmErT
l I I I I
OPEN DATE JUNE 12, 1990 i I I I
j
I I
I
ACCOUNT # I _ I
i -QTY ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENDOR _I VETJOR I VENDOR I VENDOR I
1 VACUUM STREET SWEEPER { $100,055.000 I $90,652.000 I $93,566.000 I $89,270.000 I
i1 1 I I I I I
WARRANTY 1-YEAR i N/C i *N/C I * -1,500.00 I N/C 3
I i I j E
HI-PRESSURE WASH DOWN j N/C j + 1,040.00 j N/C x/c
I k I '
I IN-CAB DOWN PRESSURE
CONTRO ; N/C I N/C i + 520.00 I N/C s
I S
NOISE INSULATION I N/C I + 1,176.00 I N/C I TI/C
I
' AUTOMATIC BOOM RETRACT I N/C I + 324.00 I N/C I N/C I
I 1
I
I I
TOTAL COST I $100,055.000 I $93,192.000 I $92,586.000 I $89,270.000 I
I I I ~
~ I I
DELIVERY DAYS I 60-90 DAYS I 30-60 DAYS i 90-120 DAYS i 70-84 DAYS
k k I I i I j 1
I I
*1-YR OR 1000 I *2-YRS IS STD.I I
1000 HRS WARRANTY
I ~R
1
S
DATE: August 21,1990
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
TO:
FROM: Lloyd V. 11arrell, City Manager
SUBJECTS RFP #1130 - CRT'S, CONTROLLER, PRINTER SYSTEM
We recommend this RFP be awarded to the lowest
RECOMMENDATION:
and mo--st responsible bidder IDEA COURIER for the CRTIS and
Controllers in the amount of $61,575.00 purchase
over a 60 month payout period for total cost of $88,200.00.
We are also recommending the outright purchase of:
$385.50
(3) Slave printers ats
(1) 18 part remote controller atS $6,020.00
(1) 9345 400 LPM Printer at:
20- 7.25
TOTAL
The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval.
4381
CRT'Si,YscoThis litrollers stands pfor rinters~connectedeptoCethlee Iobsolete
mainframe. The proposal consisted of prices andsugge8ted
replacementofs controllers, 7 printers, BACKOROU17Ds Comparison of the two responses IDEA wurier and IBM
Exert from Data Processing Advisory Board Agenda Packet (Item
q6).
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENP_ ORGROUPS - AFFECTEDs Information Services,
all other departments of the C1ty of Denton.
FISCAL IMPACTFunds for thatquipwill mentsome from budget
fun a for ptTichase of Data ocessing $1,156.50
1. (3) Slave printers 100-040-0022-9103 30.75
2. 18 part remote controller 100-036-0017-9103 $6,020.00
3. 9345 400 LPM Printer 710-043-0582-9103
4. CRT's, controller and printer system $88,200.00
Lease/Purchase Account 100-036-0017-8509
C
V • !'IXiMNy
`~ssvwr sarr,r~
CITY COU14CIL REPORT
AUGUST 21, 1990
PAGE 2 of 2
Respectfully submittedt
L10 V. ar e
Prepared 6y: City Manager
flames Tom D. Shaw, C,P.M,
Titlet Purchasing Agent
TS/jh
048.DOC i
I
I
I
[ I I
i
i
~ r
L PPP ua c.
R£PLACENENT EQUIPMENT UNIT TOTAL CUIR EQUIP CURB EQUIP
IDEA COURIER BID UNIT TOTAL MONTHLY NONTHLI IST YI IST 12 1 It 6 IR
TTEN OTT PRICE PURCHASE NAINT LEASE TOT COST RAINT TOT COS? NAINT CSf
MONOCHROME TERMINALS 1 50 696.50 14,825'C0 1,00 705.00 1,460.00 6,365.20 50,70D.00 61,070,11
II PORT REMOTE CONTROLIPR tt l 3,111.00 9,332.00 15.50 61.91 611.61 910.10 4,611 20 5,113.68
36 PORT RENOIR CONTROLLER a 1 10,110.15 10,110.15 2.10 109.19 1,S11.41 1,502.10 13,651.20 9,111.30
36 PORf LOCAL CONTROLLER tt 1 12,150.15 11,150.75 29,20 211.36 2,968.31 1,539.20 16,143 20 15,591.01
15001•F SLAVE PRINTER It 3 385.50 1,156.50 1150 1394 287.28 911.11 1,516.40 1,605.11
.
TOTALS 56 16,675.50 61,515,00 81.10 1,114.56 15,054.71 14,265.72 81,200.00 11,093.65
MONTHLY DIFFBPENCE 65.15 11,41
t 3 YEAR WARRANTY
it I YEAR WARRANT?
ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT 00i RIGHT PURCHASE
IDEA COURIER BID UMiT TOTAL
ITEM OTT PRICE PURCHASE
13001P SLAYS PRINTER it 9 $35,10 11166.50
11 FORT REMOTE CONTROLLER n 1 1,030.15 5,03015 ii
9315 400 LPH PRINTER ttt l 20020.00 1,020.00
5 13,136.25 14,207,25
it I IEAE WARIAN1f
ttt 4 HOWIE VARRAWIT
I
II
RBPLACEN3NT EQUIPMENT UNIT TOTAL CURB EQUIP CURL 0011,
ION BID UNIT TOTAL MONTHLY NORTHLI IS? YR 3ST It S 1R 6 11
ITEM OTT PRICE PURCHASE MAIN? LEASE TOT COST NAINT 101 COST MAIN? CST
MONOCRROME TSIMINALS 3411 56 901.00 $0,621,00 1.10 11911.15 12,982.11 1,365.20 19,116.09 11,010.11
I POI? REMOTE CONTROLLER III 1 3,119.00 3,219.00 1315 68.19 125.19 910.10 11661.15 5,143.11
31 POI1 REMOTE CONTROLLER III l 10,171.00 101211.00 11.06 219156 11134.10 11602.40 111941.31 91111,30
31 PORT LOCAL CONTROLLER lib 1 13,103,00 13,503.00 11.64 181.66 30461.11 1,519.20 11,16041 15,502.01
1214 TERMINAL PIINTII 1 3,395.00 16,915.00 30.00 361.16 4,35311 111,11 21,965,11 6,105,11
1 64 31,215,00 110595.00 10.15 1,021.51 24,151.14 14,165.11 NS,16i.01 11009315
~J ALL ITEMS HAVE A i MAN. WARRANTY MONTHLY DIFFFRENCI 132.11 MAO
ADDITIONAL RQUIPMENT OUT RIGHT PURCHASE
IBM BID UNIT TOTAL
ITEM OTT PRIGS PURCHASE
DISPLAY ATTACHED PRINTER 3 161.00 1,311.00
4214 410 111 PRINTER 1 11111,00 1,111.00
if FORT RENUTE CONTROLLER I 1,119.00 11119.00
5 14,1$100 151111.00
M5 Isi'el•
f1
1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
for Item G
l Most of the CRTs, Printers and Controllers are from 5 to 9 years
/ old. E'speciall•v in the case of the printers the failure rate is
becoming more frequent and our maintenance costs have been
escalating at approximately 10 percent per year. Due to new
technology and reliability some of the manufactures are now
offering 3 year warranties on the CRTs. With these factors in mind
we sent ouL an RFP to the vendors for new CRTs, Printers and
Controllers. The ntLached analysis shows the cost breakdown
bel.ween the two vendors that responded and the overall cost
allocation over a 6 year period with the ass~lmption that the
replacement equipment would be placed on a 5 year lease purchase
agreement.
The lowest bid on this equipment was from Idea Courier. With their
proposal we could replace all of the listed equipment for Increased
cost of $18.44 per month over what we would pay for maintenance on
the current equipment over the next 5 years. This additional
monthly cost of $18.44 seems to be a very small price to pay when
we can .-eplace old equipment with new equipment with better
technology.
Additionally there exists a need for additional equipment that has
been budgeted in various departments budgets. Again the low bidder
on the new equipment was Idea Courier. The attached cost analysis
shows the difference between the two vendors responding to the RFP.
i
DATEt August 21,1990
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO; Mayor and Members of tho City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: RFP 01131 - MAINTENANCE OF PC'S AND RELATED EQUIPMENT
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this proposal be awarded to IBM in
the amount of $21,200.00 The Data Processing Advisory Board
recommends approval.
SUMMARY: This proposals for the annual contract for the on site
maintenance of all PC's, monitors, and related equipment in the
City of Denton. Currently 62 personal computers with monitors
will be covered under this contract. The price offered by IBM is
based on their MRSA Maintenance Pricing. This gives us a 5 year
maintenance and is only available for PC's to those customers
with a mainframe MRSA agreement in place. This agreement extends
discounts of 20 to 308 off of the normal maintenance cost quoted
by l.P.M.
BACKGROUND: Exert from Data Processing Advisory Board Agenla
Pac et Utem 44), Proposal Cover Letter, Equipment List. MRS".
Maintenance Pricing.
PROGRAM& DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All departments in the
City of Denton,
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this service will come from budget funds
set aside by the various departments for maintenance of office
equipment. Each uepartment paying for the machines assigned to
that department.
k Resp ctfully submitted:
. ell
~ W444
ovy V._Harrel
City Manager
Prepared bye
4a met Tom D. Shaw, C.Y.M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
TS/jh
049.%C
1
I
■Wn~'V'.Y Y 11f frv'J'o~
i
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
for Item 4
Cver the past 6 years the C11.y of Denton has acquired approximately
62 pcr"onal computers of various models. At the last DP Advisory
Board meeting the motion to recommend a maintenance contract for
these PCs died due to a lack of a second. At the time the board
discuss the possibility of having the Information Services
Department assumed the responsibility for maintaining and repairing
these PCs or going on a time and material basis for repair. At
that time I explained to the board that I had requested a PC
Analyst position in the current year budget and that position was
denied. Therefore I did not have the staff, expertise, or parts
inventory to adequately provide this service to the other
depnrtments. Again this year I requested a PC Analyst position and
again this year it has been denied. Since the last board meeting
the City tins placed 4 PCs on maintenance contract due to the
critical nature of the work performed on these machines or due to
the PC becoming in operable and the time and material basis was
much more expensive than the maintenance contract. In analyzing
our situation, I feel that the maintenance contract has the least
impact on the various departments' budgets since it is a fixed cost
once a year and the departments can plan for this expense. Due to
the tight budget conditions that the City has been experiencing in
the last few years it has become very difficult for managers to
find funds for unexpected expenses. I feel that maintenance 1
conLr'nc Ls on this equipment are very similar to insurance policies 1
and give Lhe City a protection from unexpected costs and/or the , I
nonuse of piece of equipment that has become an essential part of
our operations.
i
i
c
II I
PROPOSAL COVER LETTER
The offerer proposes to provide on-site maintenance for the PCs Identified In
Attarhment A belonging to the City of Denton. Equipment will be covered between the
hours of 8:00 a.Iit. to 5:00 p.m. five days per week Monday through Friday in accordance
with the Specifications provided In the REQUEJT FOR PROPOSAL date 7/24/90 , and
further agrees to bind himself/herself on acceptance of his/her propose y t e ty to
execute a contract for service specified therein.
Total lump SUIT) price for this Contract (as shown on the Proposal Price Summary) shall be
written In words and numbers in the place provided below)
TOTAL LUMP SUM CONTRACT PRICEt
Twenty-one thousand one hundred ani twenty DOLLARS
AND NO CEN'rS($ 21,120.00* I
COMPANY NAME OF OFFERER: IBM Corporation
SIGNED 8Yt Linda M. Sanders
T1TLEs Marketing Manager
AUURESS: 1605 LBJ Freeway
CITY, STATE, ZIP: oallas, TX 75234
TELEPHONE; NUNIBFtt: 214-888-4000
UATEt 7/24/90
* Price is stated including warranted items. Price without warranted items
would be $16,599.00
i
{
L
2129k
C
PageV 1 0~-2-~
1LIP.ENT Li JL-7 440
OEFt DIVISION WC TYPE NODE, STS;S40 9EMOR? 14ISIR ICN SNJ TAINT CC
11.
1 61114111 11CI PRC'CUSING LIUAU PC 150 021148.1 l.P E 611 SLE NONOCIRCMI 0140S.V4 157.00
t 618RAIT IEFUENCS LIBRARY PC 5 1 1 0 1 9 9 1 1 7 9 5 i 5 0 : 1 2 1 ME COLOR 16E-0.1101 1 68.0 l *L
P 1 POLICE OUT DiSPITCI POLICE STATION PC .150 1826107`.110 119, C001 DISPLAY 111630 166.00
4 CITY IIIAC£1S 01F[Cl C V 0 MY BALL PC 1270 1171 00594101''1 1101 5272 COLOR DISFIAT 14112.13.51813 532 .00
S COMITY SSIVSCS VE9ICLR NAINSENANCI GARAGE PC 1210 5271 G0982D15.f1 6101 S2T2 COLOR 01511114 5212 23 60138
1 CONIUNlt1 SIiVICE ININIL CCITIOL ANIMAL SIEL1£R PC 1170 6271 00912115271 610( 527E COL01 DISPLAY 5212 l3 {ONO "
T CONIUNITT SERVICES SOLID WiM SERVICE LENTIL PC 3270 5111 OC445115211 Sill $211 COLOR DISPLAY 5111.13•51170
' ( PENANCE lCCOUNTIOO CITY TALL PC 3210 5211 00133125211 5121 $212 COLOI MolOt 5172.23.01633
I PIIANCI P0ICIASIIG SIRVICS C£NTE1 PC 3110 5111 001191BSIli 5121 5171 COLOR DISPLAY S3T1 23 0144
` 10 INFORIATLON 911VICIS DIfA MOUSING 321 i ICRINNES PC 1170 5111 00611211271 loll 5191 COLOR 01"UT 51?1 11 31150
11 SIFORNATION S6RVICSS DATA PI0CiS1110 111 1 ICI1NNt1 1. 3210 5211 00119655111 1NEG $112 3014;1 011PLAI Sill•13.0111
12 LEGAL CITI 0401NEI CL71 BALL PC 1110 $111 00562355111 6101 $271 COLOR DISPLAY 5211.23.10i1t 389.00
13 POBLIC volts 011.1)(1) IKSP MY SILL PC 1270 5211 00107415111 Iill 5171 COLOR DSSFLAT 6111.13.60455532.00
14 ITILLTI OTIL ID611•VTUSIVII SIRVICt CENTER PC 1110 1111 00508315171 6161 $212 COLOR DISPLAY 5112.13.41101 ~i
IS MUTT 111111-IOIII IPiVICt CBNTIt PC 3210 Sill 01111535111 IVE1 5112 COLOR DISPLAY SM-11-F9611
11 UTILITY ILIC 11ts11S08STl. SIIVICI C£vT£1 PC 1270 5171 00901521111 1401 5171 COLOR. OISPLAI 11TI.23.14113
It 011LIT1 UTIL IDMII-ILIC S21VICt CINTRL PC 1270 $211 00105055171 1401 Sill COLOR DISPL41 1111.13-00115
11 UTLLITS UTLL IDMINiSTIASION CITY IALL PC 32 TO Sill 00106915171 1121 5111 COLOR 511PLIT 1111.13.01130 389.00
It UTILLIi MATIIIMAITI 441161 It MAfIR PLANT PC 5110 5111 00111395311 UEG 5211 COLOR DISPLAY $112.13.04113 389.00
30 011LIT1 IISTIVIT14Alli1 Visit Willi PLANT PC s .10 Sill 00104065111 :IOI 5112 COLOI DISPLAY (112.11.01154 532.00
11 POBLIC volts lNG1Nt11110 CITY BALL PC 3310.61 1173.012 51111SOD06140 5371 COLOR DISPLAY 1171.14430 499.00
11 UTILITY • ILIC•PUD MAN PLANT PC 3110-AT 1113.061 0012111 2M60 1171 COLOR DISPLAY 5171.02711 499.00
13 FOLK! DIPT. DISFAiCI POLICE 1111101 PC AT 1271.061 51701416511 1111 1010CEIONI 1131611 465.00
14 FI11 MARMOT ID1l1ISTRI1101 CINTt4L IIRt STI PC it 5160•(11 51JOS415154 1121 6111 COLOR DISPLII Sill-06.17106 395.00
11 POLICI Dept IIIPATC11 POLICI STATION PC 11 6140.01! 51101301111 sill IONOCIROII 1139611 386.00
11 UTILITY WC 11TUMISTA. MIKE C1111. PC It 5160.018 51603114711 1101 till 1010011011 MUSS 3866.00 86.00
It 011116171 LA6014TOt1 VAST! MATER PLANT 2811.15 Ills-0011 13.0138661 t1Ol VAII
168.00
as OfILITI ILIC•PtOD MAN PLAPi PS11-10 14134.021 11.1111131 IIOI till COCLOt 111PL11 Tt•1151111
it gfiLlfl 11111. ADIII.1111TINO 81111IC1 CENT15 Pill-10 IS30.011 12.1161711 6101 till Mot DISPLAY 11.0010111
30 01166511 YAlTIVlitt ADMl1 MASTi 111711 PLANT PS/1-30 IS10.021 71.1053111 IM 1512 COLOR DISPLAY 11.4101It1 168.00
31 CITY NANIGiIS OPPICs toll IIPORCINUT CITY [ALL PS/1-30 316 1510.121 13•1101001 IN£O 1511 Mot DISPLAY 11.010111 VAIIANti
51 11111CS COST IIIYICt CITY IALL 111!2.30 216 1530.821 1101110 40 1513 COLOR DISPLAY 0116011 1
13 PIIANCI CUSS SItVICt CITY IALL 1912.30 186 1530-Ell 1106(61 Ilia 1511 COLOR DISPLAY 0811011
34 FININCI 10001111110 MY IALL 1911.10 116 1330.111 7101440 1110 1511 COLOR DIMAS 0411015
31 IINANCS 1000MIll0 CITY IALL FUND 216 1530.611 1108951 ilia 1513 00602 DISPLAY 0416011 ~
31 FENARCs TIEIS011 CITY HALL 11511.30 2111 1510.111 7101564 1110 ISO COLCI 013PLA1 1511131
If till IMIT11R1T "it 1111111131117101 C11T111, F1RI 511 PS11.10 116 1410-I11 13.1101111 ilia I5I3 tow[ DISPLAY 11•IISt011
31 1,11011, CITY MUST till SILL 11!73.30 286 1510.121 1040111 1110 1113 COLOR 6ISF1,11 1115151 168.00
34 11011HPAL stiv?Cts ICOIOIIC HvItOPIINt CITY SILL PS i1-10 211 1110.111 13•A054011 Ilia 1113 COL(I DISPLAY 11.1111111 VAIsAN11 00
` It 10410161. ItkVICII QOtST $11 t ICIINMtY 1512-30 lit 1530.131 13-ISOIO14 1110 1143 COLDS 613101.11 11•IOVII VRttiltf 168.
f 1
I
J
~...„w+ ns.a!Yn
d f: ~
Page y 2 of-q
'URRM LIST IS MY N.rJ 9
DEP? DIVISION LOC TYFE MODEL A SNP 114011 NONITOI 101:510 NAINT ^H
41 FILSONNIL PEISONKIL 224 I ICIIWNEY PSIZ-30 286 1530-Ell 33.1052922 [NEC 8511 COLOR DISPLAI 12.0135112 168.00
42 HISOINEL PER30NNEL 511 I WCIINN6f ?9113.10 186 1530.611 13.1102433 MG 8511 COLOR DISPLAI 11.0616011
43 UTILITY INSIGY IANAGENIMT SILVICE CENTER P$12.30 299 8530-Ell 1018018 AEC 1513 COLOR DISPLAY 1911013 to
r 44 1110CI ACCOUNT111 CITY IALL PS11.101 1550.061 12.1603351 INEC 1511 COLOR DISPLAY 120213!03 191.00
4S UTILITY UTIL LONIIISTIITION CITI NOLL PS12-SOL 155D•961 21-iG41001 AEG 1511 10501 DISPLAY 42.051'113[
If UTILITY VITERIVISTI WATER SIIVICI CINTH PS/1-101 1530.061 23.7611002 INEG 1513 COM DISPLAY 71.0599132
It UtI1.I11 W1TIIIWAST6 NATWI SIIVICt CENTEL ?611.301 1550.001 11.7611000 INEG 1513 COLOR O(SPLAI 1145931:6
41 UTILITY Willi INGINE81I10 S£IVICI CINTII F311.15 11 PSIS-061 21-:125112 INEG 8513 COLfI DISPLAI 23-INIII YAIIANTY 223.00
41 9116111 ITIL 16111-DIAFIIMO SIIVICI CElftl PS12.60 1560.011 12.1013151 INEG till MIA DISPLAY 12.0240195 289.00
50 (NFOLNATIOW StIVICIS DATA PIOCISSIIO 314 L MIMI P311.10 1110-Ill 21.6011091 11RG 1513 COLA DISPLAY 71.0171116 VAREANiT 410.00
1 51 UTILITY Me 11111 IS11. SIIVICI CENTER PS11.80 8580.111 09554011151 MG 4314 COLOR DISPLAY 1011123 428.00
12 UTILITY ILIC-PEOO STSAI PLANT PSIt•3O 1580-I11 214D01371 4NEG 8513 COLOR DISPLAY 11.31}11111 VARIANT? 410.00
63 UTILITI LASOIM111 VASTY Willi PLANT PS/1-10 1510.111 12.6036113 INFO 1113 C0141 DISPLAI 23.6N019 VARIANT? 410.00
54 U?ILItf ILEC-PIOD STEAK PLANT PSIi•10 1580.111 71.9011191 4NEC 8514 COL01 DISPLAY 1017196 428.00
SS UTILITY 111191 9NGIMIIIING 311VICI CDTIR P811.10 (SID-111 12.1011171 INEC 8516 COLD[ DISPLAY 1016116 VARIANT[ 428.00
61 UTILITY NAM PRODUCTION WATER PL15T PSI?-IV 1510.111 11.1039011 INEC 1513 CCL01 DISPLAY 11.111915 WARIAMT? 410.00
If UTILITY ILIC 111E11SUSSIA. SERVICE CINTII MI-10 1110.111 72.1039235 INEC 6513 COLOR DISPLAY 71.0119114 611117t 410.00
It 9111,111 UTIL IDIII-MC SIIVICI CENTER ?811.10 1580-III CI51.5014111 INEC HIS COLOR DISPLAY 1044136 410.00
11 UTILITY Willi INOINIIIINO EIM3 CINTII PIl1.19 1110-III CISS-5014379 4166 1113 COLOR LISPLLT 160598610 to
10 OMITf VIITt 10111, W111I Willi PLANT Plll-80 1510.111 11.1011111 Ilia IS13 COLCI OIIPLAT 13.11P95 WAIM11 410.00
It 471611f VASTRIV1T1R F31.1 SLYCWIT9R PLANT 1812.90 1510.111 11.1051114 1196 1513 COLOR 111PLIY 11.1121119 IMAM 410.00
h 11 Utli111 ILIC INO11111IM0 SIIVICI CE9191, P112.60 1519.111 12.1056133 1110 1551 COLOR D11PL1? 13.6PC11 WARRANTY 410.0b
*1 ISM is no bidding the display for Item 02 `
- Prices are based on MRSA discounts using the Syr option
- Warrented items have been priced and included in the total since most of these
items will come off of warranty within a few months.
- Maintenance is 24 hre/day, 363 days/yr. '
t
- All maintenance is on-site exchange or repair maintenance. ,
I ~
i
I '
i
I
~A'.~ ♦M ~ 4.ne 1'~
CITY OF DENTON
MRSA MAINTENANCE PRICING
Annual Maintenance Prices (5-Year MRSA)
IBM ONLY OFFERS 24 HOUR, 365 DAY/YEAR MAINTENANCE
Dept/or
Machine Diskjay Item Maint. Discount Price
5150 1 168.00 301 117.60
5151 1 50.00 229 39.00
Item 02 same as Item 11.
515U 3 168.00 301 117.60
5153 3 62.00 229 48.36
5271-002 12 430.00 271 315.90
5272 12 94.00 221 73.32
Items 18-19 same as Item 012.
5271-006 4 629.00 271 459.14
5272 4 94.00 22% 73.32
Items 5-11, 13-17, & 20 sane as Item 04.
5273-061 23 546.00 229 425.88
5151 23 50.00 221 39.00
5273-062 21 546.00 221 425.88
5272 21 94.00 221 73.32
Item 22 same as Item 421.
5160-086 25 475.00 271 346.75
5151 25 50.00 221 39.00
Item 026 same as Item 1125,
5160-086 24 475.00 271 346.75
1 5153 24 62.00 221 48.36
8525-004 27 110.00 229 85.80
8530-021 28 190.00 221 148.20
8512 U 25.00 201 20.00
Items 29-30 same as Item 028,
8530-E21 32 190.00 221 148.20
8413 32 25.00 209 20.00
Items 33-38, & 42-13 same as Item 132.
I ~prY .•M Fa: Xe~q
1
Dept/or
Machine Display Item Maint: Discount Price
-rY 8530-E21 31 190.00 223 148.20
8512 31 25.00 203 20.00
' Item 441 same as item #31.
8530-E31 39 190.00 223 146.20
8513 39 25.00 203 20.00
r Item #40 same as Item 139.
I
8550-061 44 220.00 224 171.20
` 85]? 44 25.00 204 20.00
4
8550-61 45 220.00 2206 171.60
8513 45 25.00 203 20.00
Items 46-47 same as Item #45.
8555-061 48 260.00 223 202.80
8513 48 25.00 203 20.00
8560-071 49 345.00 224 269.00
8513 50 25.00 204 20.00
8580-111 50 500.00 22% 390.00
8513 50 25.00 203 20.00
Items 52-53, & 56-62 same as Item 050.
8580-111 51 500.00 224 390.00
8514 51 48.00 204 38.40
Items 54-55, are priced same as item 151.
i '
t '
i
R
1 .w♦ t"Y'^
1 ~ •
GewJTYVJ
I [VOigM 1{■N'
` DATE: August 21, 1990
I
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
I 1'OS Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
r SUBJK"1': BID 111133 - PADMOUNTED CAPACITOR. BANKS
I
` REC0I,IPIE1I1'A':70Ns We recommend this bid be awarded to the ow
bifSa- Priester supply, in the total amount of $26,054,00.
SU1414ARYs This bid is for padmounted capacitoc banks to be used
in three locations in the Electrical Distribution Systems, Oak
theeeetc, apacitor1banksBlwill improve Sthehpower. factor ofstthose
circuits.
BACKGRUUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Don McLaughlin.
PROURAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFEC~'ED: Electric Distribution
Division.
f FISCAL IMPACTS Budgeted Funds Account #612-008-0252-9217.
y Respe fully submitteds
voLl V. Harrell 3
City Manager
Prepared bys
Naines DenNe Mannin
Titles Senior Buyer
_J Approved
Name: Tom D. Shaw
Title: Purchasing Agent
DM/jh ,
039.DOC
I
I
r
a • ti u~T un~
~mry+er f
I ~
BID 1 1133 I 1 I I
1 ~ I I i I i
f I I I 1 1
61D NAME FM CAFACIT➢R BANK !NELSON FLECIR!C1 CUMMINS I ➢DOn k Co. I TEMPLE iPRIESTE'i SUF'PLY1
` I 1 I 1 1 I
i I ' 1 1
i ~
OPEN DATE JULY 31, 1991 I 1 I
1 ~ i I I 1
1 I I i
ACCOUNT 1 1 i I i 1
i i D1Y I 11EM DESCAI'rTION I VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1 VENDDA I VENDOR 1 VENDOR
I I
1
l I 1
I I 1 1 I I I
EBB KVAR I NO BID I ND BID 1 f9,324,11 EA 1 4511154.11 EA i 4B,053.11 EA 1
I I 1 ' i 1 I I '
2 1 1 1 1221 KVAR 1 0 BID I ND BID 1 $11,319,41 EA 1 !11,451,81 EA 1 191948,11 EA I
i I I ; I 1 I I
3 1 1 MFG I ND BID i NO DID I nA'-TON k M ELECT, I SHALl6E11ER I
I I I I i I 1
4 1 i DELIVERY I NO BID I ND BID 1 84-98 DAYS 1 119 DAYS 1 91 DAYS I
I I i 1 I I I
I 1 1 l 1 1 I I
i i 1 I 1 i i 1
I i I 1 1 I 1
I 1 1 I I I i i
1 1 1 1 i I 1 i
i i I 1 I I I 1
I' I 1 I I I I
i
I
i
I
I ~
I I
Y
4
~ca r • o.v.a.~
yN a11L .l.Ylt~
i
E
l _ CITY ofDENTONMUNICIPAL UTItITIES / 901 -A Texas Street Denton,1176201
G
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Denise Manning, Senior Buyer, Purchasing
FROM: Donald L. McLaughlin, Electric Engineer Administrator
DATE: August 3, 1990
SUBJECT: BID #1133
Award bid for the padmounted capacitor to the low bidder,
Priester Supply. The prices were $80053/ea for two 500 KVAR
padmounted capacitor banks capable of being expanded to 1200
KVAR. and $9,948 for a 1200 KVAR padmounted capacitor bank for a
total of $26,054.
one 600 KVAR capacitor bank is to be part of the Oak Street
overhead-to-underground conversion to replace existing overhead
capacitor bank. The other 600 KVAR capacitor bank will be
located next to the Traiamell Crow building on San Jacinto
Boulevard to improve power factor on S-215. The 1200 KVAR
capacitor bank will be centrally located in Southridge to improve
power factor of the circuit serving Southridge.
DLN,: gb
08030083
cc: R. E. Nelson, Executivb Director of Utilities
E. B. Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
{
J
+U l.TYL 'Inx i:.n4
TT~
CIT
COUNCIL
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0~{xo
V o s
a+ i O
V J
o
e
~`~~COGGafl~
l
-.1 Ttfil
t € t
+f YA %r1
2651L-3/3689
NO. -
AN ORDINANCE: ACCFPTING MIPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE
AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR 'ill F; E'XPENDI'TURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE; PATE.
WilFREAS tile City
competitive bIds for the construction received tv public workeator
Improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and
City ordinances; and yy
receivledFt~nd recomrn Cended rlthatethe herein described bids employee
are the
lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works
or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals
and plans nod specifications therefore; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE. COUNCIL OF 'l'IIE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the
construction of r~ublic works or improvements, as described in the
"bid Invitations , Did Proposals" or plans and specifications on
file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according
to the bid number assigned hereto, nre hereby accepted and
approved as being the lowest responsible bids:
BID NMIJER CON'T'RACTOR AMOUNT
---1128.__ _SUNMOtI'1 COPB._~-_~_ -UQ,fL54.50
"-IJ-32'- - 1-AGaK--RuRML-Cf>HgMi1CT10N-CQ,.-- $354.549 35
SECTION 11. That the acceptance and approval of the above
c
ompetitive Gide shall riot constitute a contract between the City
nnd
f~
worksor im,)rovements therein 1 accepted oaridt approved, s until public
person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice
raww r;c n:.wr
av
t
to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract
and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, alter notifi-
cation of the award of the bid.
1 SECTION Ill. That the City Hanager is hereby authorized to
f` execute rill-necessary written contracts for the performance of
the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance
with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such
contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and
Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the
terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities
and specified suns contained therein.
SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above
competlrive Incas and the execution of contracts for the public
works and mprovements as authorized herein, the City Coun:il
hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in
the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized
contracts executed pursuant thereto.
SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately uj)on its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990,
1
BOB CASTLEOERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
~ 7r:E1NIF~t A~L'fER~; ~I tY"~E%kF' IAkY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
PACE 2
I
r ~
i
DATE: August 21,1990
I
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: 3ID#1128 - ALF.XANDEI, DRAINAGE.
RECOMMENDATION- We recommend this bid be awarded to the only
bidder, Surunount Corp., in the amount of $90,654.50.
SUMMARY: This bid is for construction of a drainage line for
Alexander Street. Although Sunmount Corp, was the only bidder
the Engineering Division is comfortable that the price of their
bid is in line with other projects.
BACkGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Jerry Clark,
PROGRAMS, Dr, PARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Community Development
Block Grant and Drainage Interest Money.
FISCAL IMPACT: Grant Funds Account #219-052-CD48-8502
#219-005-CD23-8502
#219-052-CD30-8502
0219-052-CD42-8502
Respectfully submitted:
G~
L yd V. Harrell - -
f Prepared by: City Manager
D1ame: Denise Manning -
Title: Senior Buyer
Aptprov-ed :
Namet Tom D. Shaw,
Title: Purchasing Agent
DM/jh
042.DOC
I
i
t
BID # 1128 I I I
I I !
BID MWE ALEXANDER DRAINAGE I SUNNIONT CORP. I I
I 1 I
OPEN DATE JULY 31, 1990 I I
j f I
ACCOUNT # I I
# I QTY I ITE14 DESCRIPTION I viNDOR I VENDOR I
I I I ! I
I BASE BID I $106,069.50 I
I ALTERNATE I $90,654,50 {
w+! ! BOND I YES
I I I ! ~
~ I I ! I
I I ! I I
I I i ! I
I I I I I
I I I 1 I
I I I I i
` I I I I 1
i
r
I i
~ YNt~ 9Y
1
Nhv>. V1{I
~iMw,fV
BID # 1128 I I
I I I
I I I
BID NAME ALEXANDER DRAINAGE I SU::IUNP CORP. I I
I I I I
I I I
OPEN DATE JULY 31, 1990 ( I I
! I I
f I I
I ACCOUN'T' # I I I
I I__ _.I
# I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION I VENE)OR I VENDOR i
~ JI I i I f
I I I I I
**i i BASE BID i $106,069.50
**I I ALTERNATE I $90,654.50 I I
*'I I BOND I YES I j
~ I I I i I
I
I I I I I
! I I I I
I I I I I
I I E I I
I I € I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
t
I
3
i
1
r'rva R9-V..
r
E
ecma WWI
CITY UZI! [Uil
1w SP -8 e11 i{. 01
CITY of DENTON 1215E. McKinney / Denton, Taxes 76201
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 8, 1990
TO: 'ion? Shaw, Purchasing A^ent
FROM: Jerry clark, Director of Engineering b Transportation
SUBJECT: Alexander Drainage - Bid #1128
The Engineering Division has reviewed the bid submitted by
Sunmount Corporation. The prices are reasonable alt htotalnot
excellent. we recommend that the alternate, with
190,654.50, be awarded.
The funds for the project will come
ne the retie Community
a
Development Block Grant 0778 8,000
drainage interest money ( 1 .
Sunmount is excellent contractor and c project work
q get
quickly. . We recommend award so this crucial
underway at the earliest possible Mate.
J4rcLFa r .
0904E
~ y. ~ TAY cl^-a
yAYA 1~ . .;iic F~~
DATE: August 21,1990
m CITY COUNCIL REPORT
1
TO: Mayur and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 41132 - WEST OAK STREET PAVING AND DRAINAGE
RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest
bidder, Jagoe Public Construction Co. in the amount of
$359,544.35.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the construction of 8" asphalt paving,
drainage and sidewalk on West Oak Street. The project runs from
the intersection of West Oak and Bonnie Brae to the intersection
with I35. The sidewalk is located on the north side of this
portion of West Oak Street.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation sheet, Memorandum date August 8, 1990
from Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR _?WT AFFECTED: Engineering and
Transportation Department anzens utilizing West Oak Street
area.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project will come from 1985 Street
Bond Account Number 434-002-SB85-8518-9105.
Resp Eully subiryitted:
i U
Llo d V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared byy(-
Names Tom D. Slaw, C. P, M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
TS/jh
041.DOC
i
i
J
I 6,
~irv L uKme~~
It
BID II 1132 1 1
I 1
BID NAME HST 04 FAVIN6 AND ' J46DE PUBLIC 1SUN4G-4i CORP. 1 AFAC TEIAS J R J PAVINS IALL_TEk PAVIN6 I
DRAINABE i 1 1 I 1
OPEN CA1E AUBUST J, 1998 1 1
I 1
1 I , ~ I
I
ACCOUNT 1 1 I I
TTY ITEM OESCRIP3IE4 VENDOR ' VENDOR 1 VENDOR - 1 '
$ 1 1
VENDOR 1 VENDOR 1
j
1 1 I ~ -
I 1 1 I '
1 1 SIDEWALK $(1,581,61 1 $21,535,01 1 $16,690,14 1 $19,245.11 1 $19,051,11 ;
1 I 1 1 I 1
2 1 6' ASPHALT PAVIN6 1 $342,114.35 1 $354,536.57 1 $372,025,10. 1377,811.65 I $392.i66.5i 1
1 I 1 1 1 I ,
1 1 TOTAL $359,544.35 1 $376,171.53 1 $369,315.71 1 $397,166.65 $411,218.51 1
1 1
TAI SIDENALk p 1 ; 1 $19,150.11 1
1 1 1
2A1 1 6' CONCRETE FAVINS 1 $402,666,51 I
1 I TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 $421,915,78
I 1 1
1 1 ; I i 1
1 1 ~ I I
; 1 1 I
, 1 1
1 1 I 1
I I I ~ i
I 1 I
I f ; I 1
I I I
1 I I , 1 1
I I , ~ 1 1
1 I
1 1 ,
I I ~ 1 1 1
, 1 , 1 I
I I I I 1
i 1 I I ' 1
~I 1 I I 1 I
1 I 1
I
1 , , ' I 1 1 ; 1 r
1 1 1 1 ' , , ,
r ~
1 1 e
J F
III II
I 1
I
f
E
I
P
t
4,f 4 Wi. SdVY~
rK •ra n.... a u
R[CEr,rn
CITY uL C'!;' (Gil
pUiil;I;
1990 SFr -s Fit 11: 01
Q
CITY of DENTON 1215 E, McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201
MF.MORANDUN
DATE: August 8, 1990
TO: Torn Shaw, Purchasing Agent
FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering & Transportation
SUBJECT: West Oak Street Paving - Bid 1132
(Bonnie Brae to 135)
The Engineering Division has reviewed the bid from Jagoe Public
and feel the prices are acceptable. The total bid is also
below our estimate.
Jagoe Public has done several City projects successfully. We
recommend that they be awarded the bid with a total price of
359,544.35. This includes the street construction and a
sidewalk along the north side.
J e r C C~~--
0904E
1 d
Ili
1
CITY
COUNCIL
'41 T
i
WN;
o~p 4a a♦OO
s
J D to
d
00~ c ' oOO,
~nC~CG G GOp~
TZ.
1
h
1
I
E
5. Jr M ~
.25161,-7/1589 I f NU.
1 1
AN ORDINANCE PRUVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY
PIRCIIASLS OF MATERIALS, EQUIPIdFNT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH
PUK VASE'S FROM RI3QUIREMENTS rF C(NIPETITIVE SIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFF(1TIVF: DA'Z'E.
WHERFAS, state law and ordinance require that certain
` contracts requiri0 an expeniiture or payment by the City in an
M amount exceeding 10,000 be by competitive bids, except in the
case of I)ubltc calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once
i to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or
to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to
protect the puhltc health of the citizens of the city, or in case
of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment;
NOW, THE-RFFUKE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby determines that there
is a `p561lc calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to
appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to
preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public health
of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage to
public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof,
the following emergency purchasea of taterials, equipment,
supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase Orders"
l attached hereto, are hereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NLt10ER VENDOR AFIUUNT
Va81.3 _EAS, ELECTRIC _ $9$,740.00
3
SECTION II. That because of such emergency, the City Manager
`J or designates employee is hereby authorized to purchase the
materials, equipment, supplies or services as described in the
attached Purchase Orders and to make payment therefore in the
amounts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in
accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such
purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids.
r
I
I
f SUCTION 111. That this ordinance shall become effective
Lnmr.lintely ujron its passage and approval.
' PASSEL) AND APPROVED this the ` _ day of 1990.
1
t BOB CASPLEDERRY, MAYOR
1 '
ATTEST:
I
7Efd91P R`-WA1,-TRRR-,~(,TTI sKRUARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADA111 t:FAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
I
} i
I
PAGE Two
%MI I
rr,
s
DATE: August 21,1990
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Fim!Q Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 498813 - EASTERN ELECTRIC APPARATUS
REPAIR CO. INC. - $98,740.00
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order in the amount of
$98,740.00, to Eastern Electric be approved.
SUtNARY; Purchase order 498813, is for the emergency repair of an
Allis-Chalmers Oil filled Transformer. This unit is a 69000
Delta to 13200 wye unit in the Hickory Street substation. The
price includes unloading repairing testing and reloading of the
25 year old transformer. (See Eastern quote attached). Delivery `
is expected to be 16-18 weeks.
A new unit this size would cost approximately $425,000 dollars and
delivery is in excess of one year.
BACKGROUND: Purchase order 98813, Eastern Quote #NFWR9668,
Memorandum date August 9,1990, from Ernie Tullos.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Distribution:
Electric Utility Customers.
F15CAL 1MPACTi Funds for this emergency repair will be from the
Electric Meter & Substation Maintenance.
Account # 610-080-0255-8332.
Respectfully submitted:
4!UWAV. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
pfame: Toro D. Shaw, C. P.M. ,
Title: Purchasing Age"t
TS/jh
043.DOC
I
i
THIS IS A CITY of DENTON, TEXAS
PC 98813
CONFIRMING ORDER PURCHNSEORDERNO:
XXX This nun•her must swear on on all
(IF MARKED) invoices, delivery sli{ s, cases,
00 NOT DUPLICATE C~ ane, boxes, puking spa and bins
Re0 No: 8'd No' Date 03 10 90 Page No. 01
VENDOR KMHAS/NG JYWSXW / 901-B TEXAS STREET/ DENTil TEXAS 76201
NAME/ EASTERN ELECTRIC APPARATUS 8171566.8911 D/FWMETR02670042
C2.2
REPAIR CO*& INC. DELNERY CONFI!i ICAL N SUONdSTaLYTIGh
ADDRESS R2475 EAST LONG AVtNUE ADDRESS gol A TEXAS ST
FT. YORTH• TX 76406^6594 901 A
DCt1TGN@ TEXAS 7620I
VENDOR NO, EAS00310 DEUVERY QUOTED 08 30 90 FOB DESTINATION TERMS
f
01 LT CITY 0 28596 VENDOR CAT. 0 N / A 90s740.000 S8s740.00
HICKORY SUESTATION TRANSFORMER NUMBER 2 FAILURE
PAGE TOTAL 98740.0.
GRAND TOTAL 98,746.01
01 610 080 0255 8332 OH04 98im740o00
VE`IDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3. Terms - Net 30 wi*cs otwwes Metin.e 1
t. Send &Vrwj 'rrvcica with dudtuta COW 4. snipping Instrcuons: r.0 a Destination pepaid wom ceuwwo spxiTwr1
2 BIN 10 - Atk Aocoutft FyyopN S. No faderd or state wtea t+ix shall be Included
215 E. "imey St in pri a b.W. Purchasing Dlvlskm
Denbq TX 70201 „r u n n n
1 -
i
i
' iaVfl. E 90 141 08 0000 EASTER14 ELECTRIC 1-917-589-1405 P. 2
1
FORT N HTN M MM
=pie ra}n enlooo}
y ~ V
T
i
August 81 1990
City of Denton
1701 A Spencer Road
Uenton. Texas 76205
Attentiunl Ray Wells
5ub3oct= Roqueet for quotation on ropairing Allio-Chalmoro
oil filled transformer - 69000 Delta to
13200 WYE. 12-16-20 f1VA
Rafurencoe ily Nogotation No.MNFWR 9668
Uentlomenl
We are pleased to offer our prOPOSel for the repair
of eubJect transformer.
WORK. SCOPE-
1. Unload unit from customers transportation, perform
proliminary tootu and SnePoctlons.
2. Unload ouparately 0111pped buohing and Inspect.
3. D19conneet any aide buohingo, remove cover and untank.
4. Joint lnopeetion of transformer damage.
5. 1 hotoctropho of unit so found after un1 onki ng.
6. R--novo hood framo and ouperotructuret unetook top
core irons remove calls for complete inepoctlon.
Rovlew and advise of dawase and take photographs.
7. Clean and moxger corer reviow and evaiuato core
damaxe, if any is found. Repairs would he prioed
as additional for custoirar'o approval.
S. Perform eomputor analysio of exietluq design and
comporo to present atandurdo required for improvlnx
short circult wlthotond capabilities. Denim changes
will be oubmltted for Cuotomer review.
.
A flu G. 9 90 141 09 0000 EASTERN ELECTRIC 1-a17-SE9-1405 P. 3 t
k City of Denton Page TWO
~ JJ
(11
N
9. R11 transformer designs will also bo computer antylyzed
for impluae voltage distribution to verify that the
origiiial design will moot present day standards. This
analysis gives the customer the opportunity to indontify
orialnol dooign deficioncloa with our rocommsndations
for upgradeina.
10. All appropriate matorlal associated with redesigned coils
and redealgnod braoinu will be new.
11. WP will prnvlde loss roduction options after porforming
our redesign onEinoering analysis. These options will be
priced ao additional and submitted for your approval prior
to proceeding.
12. Comploto minor inapoctlon of load top changing equipment
to lnolude,
a. Draining, opening and flushing with the oil
tap changer compartment.
b. Visual examination of moving and fixed msahlcal
parta, such as shaft seals, bevel gears, otatlonary
and movlnn contents, oto.
c. Tightness check on bolto, locking keys, pins, utu.
d. Mechanical operation with the use of the hand crank
through all portions to check for binding.
e. Furnish and install now tap changer door scuakets
as noodod•
Y
13. inspect a'i yaugon and accessories for proper operation,
loo pact and clean bushinne and all C.T.'a within the tank
and all other auxiliary wlndin9o within tho tank will be
throughly Flushed, cleaned, dried and tested. For LTC
transformero, this will include the ner•iea transformer and
the provontive auto transformer.
14. Rewind all low voltage, regulating voltage & high voltage
coils.
i
I
b., 5
thug. b S'C+ l4~l45;- 0000 EASTERN ELECTRIC i-at7-599-1Aa F'. 4
a 1
City of Denton Palto Three
1
IJ
r
15. Hydraulic leveling and dry leveling of all coils; to oquol
height of radial spacer culumne.
16. Proceoo all coils through drying oven while maintaining
axial pressure on the coils. '!ilia process removes mointure
and further nizes the coils to designed dimensions.
17. Final eizing preaeure applied and hold until coils are
loaded on the core.
18. Reproccan core and coil assetably with trot oil spray
under vacuum in lt'a own tank.
19. Furnish and install now gaskets as needed for main tank.
2V. The f ollnwing testa will be porfornsud in accordance with
the lanteet revioion of ANSI standard tests code C61.12.90%
a. Realetance measuramunto of all winding.
b. Ratio taats on rated voltage connection and
on all tap connections.
c. Polarity and rhaae-relation test: on the rated
voltage connections.
d. No load loon at rated voltage on the rated
voltage connection.
e. Exciting current at rated volatga on the rated
voltage connection.
f. Applied potential toots at 100% rated teat
voltage.
R. Induced potential toots for 7200 cycles at
100% rated test voltage.
h. Inoulation power factor toots.
I. Insulation roaietanus tonte Oaegfor) on each
windinst and core.
f
21. one coat of ANSI No. 70 gray Point will be applied
i
22. Preparation and loading of the oubdert unlt from
our facility.
23. Transformer will be shipped Pressurized in dry air.
24. Transportation & now oil is not included in our base
price.
I
b
L<
Aug. U 9'0 1-41 10 OIIOCi EASTE RIJ ELECTRIC 7-919-699- 1.105
P. 3
City of Denton page Four
-711
a
}
In lino with curront government regulations regarding oil
filled transforimors and possible PCB contamination "All
mineral oil filled transformara are presumed to be PCB
contaminated unless tests or other information prove
otherwise". All units being sent for repair must have the
olul tested to determine possible VCB contamination levels.
Both the main tank and auxiliary compartments, such as i.TC
compartments, must be eheoked ooparately. Test results
must precede the arrival of the transformer. Our proposal is
based on a Non-PCB transformer.
Our price for the rewind/redesign per our above
work scope 1 thru 24 .........................$98,740.00
Dellvory ..........................is - l8 weoks
Thlr offer is subject to the terms and conditions above and
included herein. Notice of objection to any other terms and
conditions is hereby given.
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service.
Very truly yours,
I r Christman
S r ice Center Manager
MFC/ mp
I
I
4
r
E
F ~
k 'o-v w •
- 3
t
v
Terms and Conditions of Sale.
wareknty
Prhu Rnftran:e- All Price ace NegnUnteA,
1, 1, C V
k a!,1 Uvt11 it Ano.,A No Rn,e r CI'M wI m, M,Y 'eau pal,' I nry r of toinpKuo rrlrrfnn that iota work pt,farrrla M,e rrundr lshift ate be het this
rill Vnd IiidOllor
hY W1 YnMVrIPp~ t It hin ll pV hod al Orf l~l year 1any }S r 1ih~Pmint~l the rp/ d
gitrr nnj a Af 11% oblrcinr ho a Iv dlnrrptl oil, vI. tLill i to ilif
A n, 11 tvo I,U A•,y 'ur11 !B„JA 1'161 dm,liriu u y no rfreml'ed e'Iu.pmtnl ny the Com Panv lor. In for, caw of Iawjilfmt t
~t I;%1 ironed to rrtampel on fwrchas/,'a p4n"gt, affill lhl COrfq,y nit
Iri`nAmhl en r r,illA I10,01Pd jiwcr Crr ti the fame is rswdr for ralrrill aMra11011) , ihf "Il t'OMAN nV ht 11, t,poI tit to nbl w'ritl E' nubt
-a n or II1 PIYuf a'd Iuiuq corn l i on
L'rfit 111 ten ndA,rce,Wnrll1ei. a' x1 hlcn l AhIC! 71 ereHt r Il4ich h ra Aglrn'•nh,nr mm or u, id r Idiani!,'v`dr no
o
llrilleroi6 I ,nftA,l'O, 'enW ;It
aO,,J cw li s„ AI IIA lien r9 r: to Ih1 I. rh Ilaf e'rol",CI Mold W' SMait plat the eh•npn'e'd bat !Iran ,+'l, wlYlratYd a ni d mnln0II If No 1 I)F,nf
s, N ya C0 IIetYA r,R1nA Aop'1 eg.•„ P iEAMh vd 9 or r'nn Ind Mold lurArehillwII, r thet frcCntYxe with a'.y Cno,rei'v inllrutl,onl and t'a,dnrd mdultty pro l
y peel irTpdrAnt VVI e rnriYN`unAnneE torrent owh "o-wo, to'mlfy 'Y IeVanmg. rx It Its noun, replacing YtW
P31,0 defACUra r,nrk, r,U 9 ir. h,ttooy u1 repair facility.
Wait ell Oni In nn wo i. JI/II du Coy,oeny LA Iwpnmitta for providing Ai YV Atl i
to file Who., irAbnni,a the trmov0l, diuurAibly, Irpls nhnnnl air Mifflllenon
En11 nw or" it raLA for 'bl AAY4 horn ,I'. arln Ynh: fr Olht,w lw ILArA Al h,y en'nowenr, I, v1pilf4 nr Ib utlal/ In fell eel iq neeulswV to Doi AN it
PeIlle e Policy olicrlar' the C"fiAny in bultrm ilf 111 obliVsnorf, or hrnWUlloalor costs to
Pcy o'in fro'n fht Cr'mluny IACmry a Ire ur I+riliH. The eund,titl of any evil
P,icrt gwatnd nr 1 win to, rnrety 64y1 hoot IIJ Ante of grime, If shipmerrl II'All Ile mMU111v fgierd unnn AAA pre tonw+ny !hall oil notified of and may
of iPpol Rerplront o' torndtban of /l"',9P etvno, beyond 90 days 1141 Ix' pnnrnt at All left$ Ihft rruf be mach,
Vu Asia of o,dat, 1116 p, ire w,!I bu 46owrd to th,ur !r nltowt it If~e trnr at All voi wig it d,a1l of perlotmad on a Ongle fhlll Itrelyst limo !tun
uan /hlpfrarl or romplotlr hollow, lnroi trill not Axrti IT, of rM Nlondev iii Frdty In the rein! That this RroxMrrr 1•wurf [M,Yl lion at
UnMid bAUnI,R pr mnnt!' !'um 'Lot clot, n' IAe Urtrl wvrra'y hared nn An over rime t[hAdulE, one phlinlurn Pardon Of :wch collima
Oil ball l,h Irn !hr puothm'.I Atavunt
RaVIANnq a uwnn,naunq up hnoe!,ng oil n nirl indoeol wife any Valli THE WARRANIICS SET FORTH IN THIS PROVISION All Excl. USIVL HER Ix;`Inrrnld, UII IJMI1neeM L'Ixing it
the rr,pnv l,ilny at lr.l purthewr' EIII IN APRESSLIC~'RDF IMPLIEDHE RNCWAt I UOINO IE ALL eWARRANTI STATUIORY,
1akM M E RCH A N T AV I L I for AND FITNESS FOR PARIICULAR PURPOSE AND
c
T Ixit't do" rut KAru, rd free, ProprrtY, bcentc. ALL yrARRANTICR ARISINGFROM COUPSE OF OEALINCOR USAGE06
o tow, i any
piivliegf, falls, loss, arena, Oil ,I IrP'Pn. rahe e,elyd, a nlhyr IINr ern TRAOkI Ilw, rvmed'a nrorlded AbnH of the pu'dwlia soli ieml 'H
which mar ,.fw o, hrtdaf be rpullcrb4 tu, nxnohh W, AN Venues! ulmio, r,, r'Y felltne of MA Company In ean'Ply wqh its obhgationt, Correltibn at
I rp orlil rowiltf to Ihf ttaml it. Ile p'or'n N, rte 1AIP. its wino, n, III utP, r„v W. conlotmiq if, file manner And for NI Period of time p,mldad ;aO'11
Not Any s-olirrl Dr arnuvl in I~r Inflow,, ihlohrin . 5uell errn sir la the 0,411 an,11two cor,po-tr follHlmsul of All the hab,hbts at the Coalplny
fritnu•d all its purrriall f•,d Or Iluiot roar as r„ la pfy u! Moot l:ee ter whether II a eflirm of pie nvrrhetf Iw eased In confirm in Jeff (lr+duding
~L. mnpuhv Ibr w'W each late, weld, the Cu,1aa•ts to .n rvn,aaclon a u'pLt'f negligrnn') or othviwbe wia' 11th t tw w rising owl of rho wort frrrfarmld
C
i are froil,ir Etl to me hlteurAeo.
Terms of Payn+ent In nu Pr•r,1 tl+all the Col"Iny III rHGnnsiblit lot Naimoli fetYlliAjI
tinnnq, Ven'•np w rrpUr,Ing hrlula VnV UI,
PN•ridnt hduf coon,rrlr,utal i'witu Liability
Delayed Paymenu
II pA l fro rot laude In Witc ter' Will, INm/, A 11 14'" Into Comgr•y, 'Y wet:acfaa Ind wPpllan At Vey tin. almH For be bride
in Into o m owl pedurllnt lie lgl'KIL Of s At l'yt for damAgf or loss of
ally
will, w11s1OUAnl ig ajar hot IM 't l to f the Gnn~pfnr hr im, ord. etc ti$ loo 1.
bIdhA 17 1hi At ' of L' teJrettlrr m nr Imrwni 1'011. lm, lover' e,hln PnAwl ty ON eou'VmMt, !Cn 01 as cost Of IevAAVS, will VI loss of
I i mVn tt` M IJMd1an 1 elan! or tho' L, fit 1 f fNf an Ill', ugranj rkrnlnfu rd M pawl' 111lrrrlt, cost of CAIIIIIII. COft Of llsYd air intoedam
A', 11 TAr Pe i starer or lempuMW rnn 11 'Nof ibCIATIihinA1 11 (If I"ll' nfil oltoeilHl ilor'Oftt no
bAlanor,. will eai+pnq Iuril P,m 1, eIVnA O} Ctnfn min AI the/ pufdVVei, a Iw Y^Y
Pay m ante spec tai, :nr I it tic I, weidr+tol, M conAfnusnaat d 1m IpH whenatvor
ih/ COmliany 11,111 have IN light VI iWeiloe too to put;ol rayllMbf in fill houli 'rt of it,, purchafr elf IMIh hilUn as toook,ovl rdlh/ Pllie
alit Prue of any ilme, it, in its ordnlua, ilia IuunciA! i iiic MP at the ioo fi"air of the Cimbroy ow-fl, rlfill Jo Illy eefIJ1ACL air anythlog donf in coeneepon
dom not loslidy thole ibaf lnrymtrt WINI lh rotill, florin ai po Perlu'minta M badge 0!11!1011, a from ihf mAndfaelulf,
5hnilld pie Ji At& Is Ilhuay/d I e14r14A It, "wri ION Oily IPq'd lilt 'Will f01 fnq, 0, 11" alulln nd m rout n `Iect; rt M tmu1ll i' V Impolp I to
d, tq, llu ill t lAu hall hire Or 'joill, l il' rlglenn Nd thrnuph0wl vilwin•nnm I',rvErad For no 1uM11h/d widoor JIM adntreel, home l on uwnract,
lM Period oncul l in ltb nM (ac der co Millar! ChorgH, bum In fail PreiuAinq nagiign tiff a olhAfw,ln, e1+Nl nnf /seem{ she come set Isle
te.tY. M Nnf ad/f A,xl to 1d feCWer 119 prhlmg R op< h!in ,l lot }IM were
hf poi thasa'"i '1 r V I ndamnif KISwn
II wok ' JWpvomul by the y(xchlur• IM Cainideli llo, ire plynw!'I PwrdVir enetl ii,dahlhily AM the the Complry, ltArmitrl for any C141",
DIllmatineea A CCWrtilidirtl +nd tetra purlwmod undo d4iem lkrehvery-RIe1e aT Loge hAbiliUn VM drn,gfs im,'LiA'mq, loot not limited fa, fly' euH al ConIpIMAN
",In grnelnnuntel fwdln YnA InlunctioM well tiolno of Ihnd part" far aNYekfl
All t, VIlfrour r'mn ruse dmu as 1'. the n[rdunl of he le'hthAMI Vltl shift duruegP In Moovety and perfanot rlury, lneludicq death, otewnll'q whop the
he ddrl to IN kiralrc. "llotinar,tr all Il,e wmk brleondu Vxl In eoAlwVIVl1 w•th " daaasal.
Ri,k nor Icxr AN dfnugl donna 11111:1 w OW to .n y, tote Crleapo"ll a 111010f, f1120911041001 nrave nro tan M141 1,at"C1111 of'I mrkerpl 11din Clot iw tiuhin dtitwood
tof'ir ify a •eyuk facility 1h69 A-l'"m wino the fnneAln•r, r l 'ht le dif a above
KeenAler dlall den held rid of taw AN ON'" III My rr,r j matlrlet 1fory r fi le roils ice of llte Company. Wtij!Mt
Aid cnnglalvillt Arkh lad Autine Inv Intl froth try the Cumpa" y• moott Ar'Y aThe It l C 'fl lat ley Ihfll, Wit tool In rite work, cOntp?Y with Of uruaroM
1, all of the Apolkst`to Workman's IIYrYe/n'I C.om Vyroetiun An.
of the he dl~ueeeNln Iir1nq hoot pain lots fit damage lieu to for the
rinser. Urlrf ulRrwAr IprHA In wei ling LnMltr ilia PVw h.wn all
jail , Abwl d, eh De dnfnmrned by Ina Co1mlAny. Termination
shipping, this Any rider ,w eonb;'el may Ila Jt'rminrrd by the pw^hillo, Ylya'od o I
Shinning ln,l'm' eun,plethnn dwlri ore app,mnmnlt e'ut tie IN;ed on "li Ia rho CW'ou ly Inn wpan i+nnw•,t e
p,nrwnl WOW of all nw"fli, f nloovi O mud spetwit'l bmr the hwrnhosil. try mineilrn tall rrFi
i1nlul pie frowt tr r''PuetM nn Vs V,xcha,r el mill an Ball;" shlomr,tl Minimum Billing
Ytt mU!diem!, 111 mil lei ant ItNIc1 Ix'If Mrtwd On 1Iinglr order will he 50.
m "It Pormrlnln, 1M CMPMiry IeMrVN Ihr f!rhl to p''D prlrn to Ihn conlntN
Ih'Iror„n lee Scrap MaIII
force MlJeura
The Cnmpury dull not If, hAtde hot 4,L,is to Pin lam rl Wd~ /e+ All x•rlp mNnraH tweuma tnrpM>•rtYa the Omprly.
p,;, mote rA Ii to fI•a. 11,xrl WAN, or nil NO lehnt to I l • al or f Container
of any gore,Amealel Aolh,a.fy Of aI -he uwrrhr,,, riot.lediarifo, i'.'nl Of trot"
IhorllSe, CAI flta'Uijn. lavhf Catlin, u1 left A'ng1, w,acli Ur she dr iI An tai is ehrpl will tea n'D114 Pit NOW 'Able CWt70 .nlI and IpK,1111ipp,
henili'srtaliun, ir•Ab4i!e to fit l nrceurrv labor n,Alerinn, Of n,anugrrn, rt,g tlrwu, I,uf r11w,A 6611 ba nedo• if ehnned in thirrd co'rl-tlall W Ina Iaeloly
IAOi III'M Iron ulwA Icurl'rr, at lie to My CIIAP btl Weil n ren1601OPWO w oinrl Vein lbougneiy,I lry III CnellP4W within 90 d lisf'omdall el tol
ir,nmPM, rhagre 4r Pd1:'•t
toot h ul
in the rHnt of drier i't nn lm miner alai IA any rite twill, Ihr IIa/w I•r
(Irlitrry No, t•mr hr cilti of A'ior old! br/afredlM by A I'rh+A of bmf rnnun shit
net/nwv 111 nrHColoo sir elf Pat wl (ugh door
I
1
wte A A]
yk~
8
1
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager
THRU: R. E. Nelson, F,xecutive Director of Utilities
FROM. Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities
DATE: August 9, 1990
SUBJECT: HICKORY SUBSTATION TRANSFORMER FAILURE
On Monday, August 6, at 2:05 p.m., the Substation N2 transformer
experienced an internal fault and was disconnected by
differential relaying from the 69KV source and 13.2 KV main
feeders.
There was no interruption of service to our customers since we
were operating with both transformers in parallel.
The load on the station was reduced by transferring all, or
portions of the 13.2 KV feeders to adjacent substations.
Measurements were made of the internal windings of the failed
transformer, and it was determined that it would require
rewinding.
The failed transformer was manufactured in 1965 and is a 12/16120
MVA unit with load tap changing for automatic voltage regulation.
It weighed 90,000 pounds with oil, and 60,000 pounds after
r approximately 4,000 gallons of oil was removed for shipment.
Quotations were obtained from three b.'_dders to rewind the unit IAS
follows:
_ J 1. Low Bid: Eastern Electric $ 98,740.00
Ft. North, Tx
i 2. Southwest Electric $103,041.00
Oklahoma City, Ok
3. Magnetek Ohio Transformer $108,900.00
Bradenton, Fla.
i
i
I
i
~ I
i
I
k'
r
Page 2
Hickory Sub
We accepted the low quote of the Ft. Worth, Texas company, and
shipped the transformer Wednesday afternoon. They now have the
unit to begin repair.
We did consider junking the unit due to its age (25 years), but a
new transformer would cost approximately $300,000 and would
require one year lead time. We decided that we could not operate
reliably since our only spare would be in service. when the unit
is disassembled, the shop may find that additional work/parts may
need to be replaced especially in the automatic tap changing
section. We expect to have the unit returned for reinstallation
in about 18 weeks.
We have processed a budget transfer in the amount of $130,000 to
cover all the expected cost, and have notified our insurance
carrier of the loss.
we have installed a spare unit that was purchased some five (5)
years ago expressly for this eventuality. it is a 28 MVA unit
compared to the 20 MVA faulted unit, and should be carrying load
with everything back to normal by Monday, August 13, 1990.
EBT:tn
08090116
f ,
r
F
r
d
F
CITY
COUNCIL
i
o~aooaa o {
Q00 N r O
o
COQ ~ 1 gyp; i
~ro N t ~+pV`'
oOOQc
C B
t. Vral r
l .yR1ej r s„f,
251"1L/1589
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND Jac~o -Publ' Co. i
PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT-Yffe ; AN&,~ mm-aa--AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
I WHEREAS, on Mrt;jt_1~_, 1920, the City awarded a contract for
the construction of certain improvements to Jaga -Publly Co.
in the amount of i jOI73,266.50 ; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager having recommended to the Council
that a change order be authorized to amend such contract with
respect to the scope and price and said change order being in
compliance with the requirements of Chapter 252 of the Local
Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I. That the change order to the contract between the
City and Q~-P F,iLys~ w _ , a copy of which is
attached fiereto, n t e amount oF"-
n Vsz)late a 'phf ft oars 2n_ . s
11 ere approved an t e ex ex en tuts of funds there or a ereby
authorized.
SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective
immeMiily upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day of _ , 1990.
,
it
BOB CASTI--BERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
I
JENNI - R, W TTERTr TITY-S~CRUM
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
` DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITC}t, CITY ATTORNEY
1
BY:
i
I
I
DATE: August 21,1990
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
F TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
F'ROMs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID fl1069 - OAK HICKORY & FRY PAVING AND DRAINAGE
(CHANGE ORDER 43)
I
RECOMMENDATION: we recommend Charge Order V3, to Bid #1069, in
ttheamc,unt of $20,111.98 be approved.
SUI*IARYs This Change Order is for additional curb/gutter and
I videwalk required along Fry Street due to additional work
required for water and sewer services. A portion of this expense
is for the addition of handicap ramp along Fry Street. The
original contract price was $1,173,266.50. Change order 1 and 2
previously approved by Council, increased the project to
$1,209,::79.92. Change order #3 increases the total to
$1,229,249.90.
BACKGROUND: City of Penton, Change order dated August 9, 1990,
and Memorandum dated August 8, 1990 from David Salom, Civic
Engineering.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Engineering
Department, Jagoe Public Construction and citizens utilizing the
Fry Street area.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for thin Change Order will come from Street
Improvement Bond Funds. Account 9434-002-0010-8503-9105.
Respectfully submitted:
4 L1 V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared byys~s
flame s Tosi+ D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Titles Purchasing Agent
TS/jll
044.DOC
1
i
I
CITY OF UENION CHAtJGE UkULR
1:-~riv~i~slon f~apaTrentT- 96854 rraer No.-~.Z~n9e sr er'FJo.~"-
I Engincerirr~ _
roJec ccE-(o-~ Mae Prepared
Uak,Hickory & Fry Paving /Drainage 434-UU2-OUIU-85U3-9105 _August 9, 199U
7 -NW46 and A(ldress oi'-l onTractor
Jagoe-Public Co Y.U. Box 25U - Ueuton, Tx_ 762U1
~-tiescriptiorti~~worl; TncTuc~ed~in on rac'T:
See hewo Attached
-i5or~dre an reason or ere -T individual changes as: , e~
I See Memo Attached
Tu: - Ur g na Uon rac It!JSe --~:go in r g na ev se
Contract Item Estimated Unit Estimated C.O. Uit Estimated Estimated
Changes f10. quantity Price Quantity Frice Cost Cost
B.
C.
D.
Total oa
11TTrT9inal-Con rac r ce u ncrease n on rac r ce
New Contract Price *$I Te ,0N Uecrease in Contract Price _
*with Chan Time O ncrd
c mer Treasome - --s, ew con rac i`~aYs
on ra oecrease y Y
THE AFUREMENTIUNLD CHANGE, AND WUkK AFFECTED THEREBY, 15 SUBJECT TU ALL
f CONTRACT STIPULATIONS AND COVENANTS.
13. ISSUED FOR REASUNS INDICAILD ABU E, flCCA L-,_
k iec6LCRTTuperv sor a e
I _
i
14. ACCEPTED BY CITY ENGINEER: 8 QU
In ure a e
15. ACCEPTED BY CONTRACTOk: zee! il`t'1e a e
gna ore
-16. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ~e a e
--3i-paure
ti
DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES: ---7`ffl a e
gna ure
` rc>--.
-n' N
v rf T CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
11. PURCHASING/FINANCE gna ure ---TlTree- --Ta f-e_
COUNCIL APPROVAL (If needed) Uate
t U631E
t
s G
Fry Street Overlty
CSYO1 DEt1TOR
Y. r
BiO SHEET
.9f 7.506.8200, D/FWMM434-2520
'Nineertrg )loston 817/566-8358
vII10,01: Dar+moll a1?r5ff ?151
:.,,p,j,{,j1 r,!;+a++ wt Z Perlod _Z1._ g o To 7 - si'- X10
Cantracror, .3goe•:.otic :1 AWraa: P 0 Box 2650, Oanton,'exaa
:ra)ect: 'fy5t ~rar1)y (atinulodControctwat: 111,310630
Sid 4a.. i,)6,) P 0. Mo.: 96854•Aat.•434 002 5885 8508 91 45
40. Canlf%t "firkIng Ne J 5 Deye Ibed (,,0
r '
Untt 9MMY 0004 Yetae
?E3CRIPT101i0FWORK Of Origimi ComphtW Unit 0f C4 mp14%9410?
• mmurt EA milt to Dole PrIa Work
SP-51 m11A2-HMAC,N*rlty Sy 1,378.' 1378 18.35 $114,3b6.
SP•15A 41Jbti0vt EA I I =150.00 $150.00
9P-15.9 sS;ra+hantrole EA 1 1250.00 1000
TOTAL $11,656.30
: mp" Orders:
3-8 Cemovt COnC. C & 0 lF $30 $1.00 1954.00
3-C ReMweCott, Drives SY 10.67 $4.00 $42.68
4ddiMlMse11 54,04 135.00 $1,891.40
3.2-A Cane. 568 $6.00 $3,408.00
5.8-A-1 6' Gat 23 $23.30 $540.50
03•A 4'Ctee•S/* 559.17 $20.00 '111,183.40
8.3.8 60 Cone,O/W SY 58 $23.50 $1,363.00
SP-2 Concrete Sir iF 424 $1.00 $42400
Peps I
. %
a 1 P t
Fry Street Overlay
M
Quantity Quantity /aloe
GFSCRIPT Or Origin) Completed Unit of Completed
!tm • Mmehre Estimate to Date Price 'ark
:'arge Wars Cont.
ex;r•s 8r~akl,ig Out Cores lF 305 ti 00 $30S.00
Ctrnga Order Total 120,111.-;$
Pertial Esti malt Total 131,768 28
Lm Previous Esti mate
Amount Due This Estimate
1
VL
_J
Pape 2
f
f
E
rrL r Y Y a.....f.~~
Thu urdereigrwd Contractor certifies that all vork, Intl Wing materials and equipment
on hand, covered by this Periodical Payment has barn complolad or dolivsrW In aocordifa
with ite Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid b j him for vork, rmateriils,
end equipment for vhich Previou- d .Rents vere issued and r ived from the arner,
wJ that current payment stwvn herein is due. pp ~
CONTRACTOR JAGOE-PUBLIC CO. By. ~S..~ Date _-t7=L=-0
R rna,eWcdforPayment by: Total Value ofOriginil Contract Rrforrned1 o
-1"' 4ILtj P Extra Work PErformW - Shown Above or S 90-0
rojcctlnapeet Dote Attached Siatemep(
~~~s^.p. `Y}1ater(els on Nand - Shown Above or
Insy tionDepl. Date Attached Statement
Total Yil us of Work to Data 7 &;f ed
Leas: Amt. Re1ai n:d /0 9K5~3
tkt Amount Earned on Contract.
Approval for Payment By:
Less Amount of previous Payments L9 7. G/
9 ~ NLANCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE .
Wilily Dept. or City Engr. We
E
i
i
E
I
t
It
i
I
e
C ITY
.14COUNCIL
T I
TTTTTTT
l
o°~ •o 0
a
0
a
orr CO
}
i
,r
26511,-5/36119 6
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR TH EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS TOR PURCHASES
OF HATFRTALS OR EQ UIIMENT W11IC11 ARE AVAILABLE FR%1 ONLY ONE SOURCE
IN ACCURDANCI' WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH
PURCHASES FRUIT RENUIREMENTS OF CO(IPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
W11F1'F,,A5, Section 252.022 of the local Government Code provides
that procurement of items that are only available from one source,
including: items that are only available from one source because
of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies;
films, manuscripts or books; electricity, gas, water and other
utility purchases; captive replacement parts or components for
equipment; and library materials for a public library that are
available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution
rights to the materials; need not be submitted to competitive
bids; and
WHM:REAS, the City Council wishes to procure one or more of the
items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, 'THEREFORE,
111E COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the following purchases of materials, equip-
ment os suppllea, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached
hereto, are lsereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NUIBER VENDOR MOUNT
_q~Q17 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM $70,987.50
96818 IBM 529.462.00
SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above
items SEM-1 not constitute a contract between the City and the
person submitting the quotation for such items until such person
shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing
Department.
SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute any co'nt'racts relating to the items specified in Section I
and the expenditure of funds pursuant tp said contracts is hereby
authorized. '
r
t
L N
SECIMN 1V. That this ordinance shall become effective
immeditilely ujx~n its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the J_ day of ,1990.
BOB CASTLF.BERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
7ENNI T1AT:'CE~t 'fY~E~k TAAY
APPROVED AS TO LECAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
t
i ~
v
DATE: August 21,1990
ry,,rW CITY COUNCIL REPORT
T0: blayor and Members of the City Council
VROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHV E ORDER 098817 - AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS,
INC.
i
RECOMMENDATIONt We recommend this purchase order in the amount
of $70,987.50 to A.M S. be approved and processed for payment.
The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval. 1
SUM11%RY: This purchase order is for the renewal of software rl
license maintenance agreement to A.M.S. for the local
governmental financial software (LGFS). This is a single source
purchase for proprietary software maintenance and is exempt from
biddiny requirements. Included in this software program are the
following subsystems, LGFS, Fixed Assets, Performance
Measurement, Job Coat Accounting, Cost Allocation, Extended
Purchasing, inventory Control, PC Interface, and Report Painter.
This purchase order covers the time period from May 1, 1990
through July 31, 1991.
BACKGROUND: Purchase order 498817, exert from Data Processing
Advisory Board Agenda Packet (item 3) letter, invoice, price
sheet from A.M.S., and Data Processing Advisory minutes.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt Information Services,
Purchasing, WareEouslng, Accounting, Finance and Utility
Departments.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will come from budget
funds account number 0437-036-017G-9103.
I
Respec ully submitted:
Lloyd V. Harrell
P City Manager
r pa red by
Names Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Titles Purchasing
TS/jh
046.DOC
f
184"l4~ r
THIS IS A CITY of DENTON, TEXAS
CONFIRMING ORDER Fxx PURCHASE ORDER NO: PC 88817
This number inust appear on all
(IF MARKED) novices, delivery slips, cases,
DO NOT DUPLICATE cins. boxes, packing sans and bills,
Date: 08 14 90 Pape No. O l
Re4 No: Bid No
D
VENDOR AURCf1ASlNG DWSION / 901•S TEXAS SWE7 / DENTON. TEXAS 76201
NAME) AM 8171566.6311 DIFW METRO 267.0042
17.'7 NORTH KENT STREET DEUVERY CONFIRMATION ONLY C11
ADDRESS ARLINGTUN• VIRGINIA 22209 ADDRESS DATA PROCESSING
324H Es 11CKINNEY
DENTUNe TX 76201
4
VENDOR NO. AMS49000 DEUVERY QUOTED as 30 90 FOB DESTINATION TERMS
1
4
Ol 1 EA ITY 0 93921 YENOOR CAT. / N / A j, 70*987e500 70@987*50 1
GFS MAINTENANCE AUGUST 0 - JULY 3Is 19910
E ~
1
i i
1
4
f I
f
t
PAGE TOTAL : 70:987.50
GRAND TOTAL 3 TO 987;50
` 01 100 036 0017 8521 70x987.50
t
h '
r VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: 3. Terms - Not 30 Iuniou w"iss oea%t l
1. Sand orli Inwta vAth &VIcate copy. 1. Shipping Gmtnrclwt FOR Duslinatm grope lunwu oew*%O wecla.al
Z. BIN to - Accounts Payable 5. No hWwW or stele sales to shall be inckdw.
215 E, MoK" SL In prlcos billed. Purchasing 0tv1slon
_
J Denton, TX 70201
1r.N 4
Y
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
for Item 3
During the past ten yehrs the philosophy of the City of Denton has
been to purchase software systems versus developing them in house.
The LOPS system from American Management Systems is an integrated
financial system that was first installed in October of 1982 with
the base system. In January of 1987 a number of subsystems were
purchased and at that time the maintenance for the next 3 years was
negotiated in Lhe purchased price. The software maintenance
agreement ensures that the City of Denton will be provided with
ongoing technical support, new releases of the software, fixes to
known problems and the hotline support. This cost is quite a bit
higher than last year, the increase is due to the subsystems coming
under maintenance this year for the first time. It should be noted
that while this cost is significantly more than we pay our
progrnmmers, this agreement ensures that our software keeps abreast
of changes in the financial area of local government both from a
legal and procedural stand point.
i
I
4
WOO"
y
American Management Sxstemse I11c,
May 11, 1990
Mr. Gary Collins Project No: P2649
Data Processing
City of Denton
324-B East McKinney Street
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr, Collins:
Effective August 1, 1990 the tGFS maintenance support for the City of
Denton expires. Under the License Agreement, the City of Denton is entitled to
purcliase maintenance support from AMS for additional periods. Some of the
benefits LGFS clients derive from purchasing on-going support from AMS are:
• Delivery of annual enhancements to LGFS along with completa
installation instructions,
• Updates to LGFS documentation.
• Continued active involvement in the Users Group (one of the main
sources for developing enhancements lists).
• Support with the development of new report requests using AMS
provided report writers.
• Hotline support of LGFS processing questions.
We would like to continue to provide the City of Denton with enhanced
versions of LGFS as they are released, Per your contract the maintenance fee
for LGFS is 15% of the prevailing price list (attached).
Remittance of the attached invoice will provide the City of Denton with
LGFS maintenance support for the 12-month period of August 1, 1990 through July
31, 1991.
If you have any questions, please call me at (703) 841-6731,
Sin ly.
Lee Ross
Manager, Product Support
1777 Nurrh KeNr Street . Ailinglon, Virginia 22209 . (203) 8414" .Telex 64639 •Answertwk Ab1SM
` Regional Ohms ln: Chicago • Denver . Housion • New Yor$ . San Francisco
i
tll'J A
1
r
American Management Systems, inc.
Mr. Gary Collins May 11, 1990
Data Processing
City of Denton Project No: P2649
324-B East McKinney Street
Denton, TX 76201
Iy,YO IC.E
LGFS Maintenance Fees for August 1, 1990
through July 31, 1991.
LGFS $ 29,925.00 II
Fixed Assets 4,500.00
Performance Measurement 2,250'00
Job Cost Accounting 4,500.00
Cost Allocation 4,500.00
Extended Purchasing 9,000.00 1
inventory Control 8,150.00
Personal Computer interface 750.00
750.00
Report Painter
SUBTOTAL: S 64,425.00
LGFS Maintenance Fees for May 1, 1990
through July 31, 1990.
Job Cost Accounting $ 11125.00
Cost Allocation 1,125.00
Extended Purchasing 2,250.00
Inventory Control 2 Ob2.50
SUBTOTAL: S 6,562.50
TOTAL INVOICE: S 70,967.50
j
-
J Lee Ross
Manager, Product Support
PLEASE NOTE: PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIYED.BY_JULY 31, 1990, ORDY JUNE 25_,__~99-Q
9
i0 R_E.CEIVE SPECIAL jRd-bfEt
Please make remittance payable to: AmeericanRManagementFloorems, Inc.
1777 North Kent Street
1777 North Keel 1;tre 1 - Offices Arlington In Chicagoia t e1 O - k70I) 8416000 rte Telex bk46,M -AFr we Kok AMSINC - San
f
r i -r 4 1
'I f
oar ~ ~
u
Local Government Financial System (LGFS)
LGFS - IBMIGROUP 30
PRICE SCHEDULE
1. SOF A ENSE FEES `E
LGFS iBaalo CIC&NSAM „ i
System) Includes'
• Budgct(ng • Expenditure Accounting for Purchaser
• Plaening • Accounts Payabl^
• General Ledger • Cash Disbursements
• Revenue Accounting • Expenditure Accounting for Payroll ,
• Accounts Receivable • Cost Accounting
• External Financial Reporting • Grants Management and Reporting
• Responsibility Reporting • Project Reporting
• Encumbrance Control • Cash Management
Optlonal Fixed Assets..... . . .
.........................................................................30.000
30,000
Subsy Names Job Coat Accounting
Cart A71ocHfom ..........................................................,.........,.......60,000
Extended Purchasing
Inventory Control (must have Extended Purchasing) 63,010
Performance hleasuremeil 15,ot0
Investment Inventory ........................20.006
Advanced Budget Preparetloo 30,000
Work Order (must have Job Cost Accounting) ...............................20,000
Flmt Management (must have Work Order) .50,000
Debt Maaagement .............................................................................25,000
Documenutlon: Two copies 'sJl Ier at deodatechnical d documentation acv included. Additional copier of soy
manuals
2. TERM M~ Of CENSE AND RENEWAL
percent 0) Che years. Initial At t end o fee. Wt{al term, Licensee may anew the License
The initial term annually for a fee License (2) thirty
3. MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY
the system It warranted for one (1)year fromthe date of deliveryorthe software. As optional annual maintenance
parent of pnw onsmal licence roe fannLGFSnh~~t release. The current annual
m~ ice provides o continued warranty,
4. INSTALLATION
As part of the license fee AMS will install LOPS and the llesaeed options an your computer and complete the standard
Installation Lest.
' S. IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT
AMS professional staff will provide support for training, product coteulting, conversion, and other tufts necessary to
Implement the system. These tuka will be conducted primarily at the client's site. Support will be provided at standard
AMS rates lbr professional services, to attached. Travel lime to and from the client's mite will be charged at 6096 of the
standard rate. Reasonable travel, living, and other outer-pocket expenses to provide the support wid be billed to clients
at AbiS
assisitance, aaclient may elect to purchase $50,00 of profetesssional alrvlces at a 10% dinrounts(6for 461oa1 implementation
6. TERM3 OF PAYMENT OF SOFTWARE LICENSE FIEF
1 A. 85% or ilcens fee upon execution of Llaos Agreement and delivery of 4ocumeotatloo.
t B. 1691 or license fee upon dehvery or the soRwore.
C. Contractual fees, expense reimbursement, and charges for additional topporl due upon receipt of monthly bill.
D. A finance fee of two (2) peromt per month will be due for may amount not paid within thirty (30) drys ordue date.
EFFECTIVE .MY 1, 1989 FRICES SUB.IECT TOCHANA "re Otlf 1101"
Corporrie Hoilsdqurrlers 1777 North Karl Street) Arlinglon_Vlrginls (703) 64t3000
i
a- u. s
e ~rsv
v -e
p,rva Ytr ~ o.
Decision Support Tools and Data Base Options
IBM Versions - All Processor Groups
PRICE SCHEDULE
1. SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES Price
I
Decislon persona ICorn puler Interface (PCI),Including PC Report Pdnter 5111000
Support Report Distribution 15.900
Tools: IMAG W E (Restricted Version) 25,000
IMAGINE (Uruestr Icted Verslon) 50,000
REPORTER Included
Alternate D82/00 $50,000
Technical ADAPAS/CICS v
Verslonst DATACONI/CICS 50,000 J
IMS/DflDC 75,000
The surcharge for alternate Iechnlcal ver.lons applies to the base product (CUPS, $15,1IRS), not !o the optional t
subsystems.
Discounts on lhelicense feelisted abcvtprovidesten(10)copies; additional copies are available at the lollowingllcense
PC•9asod Ices:
Tools: $5,000
Second ten copplrs 2500 i
Third ten eop(M 1,500
Additional sets of ten copies
Documentation: Two cog los of ell user and lechnIcal documentation to: minfrarne software a-* Included. Additional copies of any
Menus areavaliablestslandardlist prices,
i
2.11ERMOF LICENSE
AA15 providos s license to use the software at a single computer facility for a ten,n of thirty (30) years. For persona)
computer products, each copy permits use of the software on a single mactilne. f
7. MAINTENANCE, ENHANCEMENT, AND WARRANTY
The system is warranted for one (1) year from the date of delivery of the software. An optional annual maintenance
service provides continued warranty, lelephoneconsullation, and enhancement releases.ne current annual malnle-
ranee fees are fifteen (15) percent of prevailing license fees.
1. TERMS OF PAYMCNT
A. 70% of I lcense fee upon execu lion of License Agreement.
8.30'%of license fee upon del Ivory of the software and documentation.
C. Expense reimbursem ruts and lees for support provided on a time and materials basis are due upon receipt of
monthly bill
D. A finance fee of IK'o (2) percent per month will be due for any arr>wnt not pall wittdn thirty (30) days of due date.
1
EFFECtIVE 1111EMPER 1, two
PRxxs IMECt 10C11ANOE W D00 NOtlet
Corporate Heoddusrtwo 1777 North Kent Street _ Arlington, VirgVnla(703) 0116000
II
1
f
1, J
4
! C
r
MINUTES OF
DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
MEETING OF AUGUST 9, 1990
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Kuykendall, Bob Minnis, Brian Scott,
Charles Ridens
' MEMBERS ABSENT: Cengis Capan
OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Collins and Dave Dickey
Jim Kuykendall made the motion and Charles Ridens seconded the
motion that the minutes of the January 9. 1990 meeting be accepted
as presented. The motion was passed unanimously.
Charles Ridens nominated Jim Kuykendall for Chairman of the Data
Processing Advisory Board Brian Scott seconded the motion, it
I passed unanimously and Gary Collins turned the meeting over to Jim
Kuykendall.
Gary Collins briefly described the department's background and
operational philosophy. Under this philosophy the City of Denton
has maintained a very minimum staff. Gary Collins explained that
the 'LGFS' system is a totally integrated Financial System and the
increase in the annual fee was due to the number of subsystems
coming under maintenance for the first time. In negotiating for
the subsystems in 1967 we negotiated that purchase price would
include 3 years of maintenance rather than the traditional 1 year
of maintenance. Gary Collins explained that while $70,000 was more
than we would pay for a Programmer that we receive more than just
' Programming services from this agreement. He explained that in
! addition to the annual release of the system, with this agreement
tie also receive technical assistance via phone "hot line" for not
only Data Processing staff but Accounting staff. The AMS staff
stays up-to-date with changes in the Financial Industry, Government
regulations, and auditing procedures and incorporates these changes
into their system. Gary Collins explained that in order to have
in house staff perform all of these activities it would require
more than the cost of this agreement. Jim Kuykendall explained the
reason that the D.P. Advisory Board looks at items like this
maintenance agreement. Gary Collins explained that $6,562.50 of
this cost was for the 3 months of maintenance on the subsystems
r that were purchased in 1987 in an off cycle time frame and the
$64,425 was for the 12 months of maintenance on the entire system.
Charles Ridens made a motion that the Board recommend the City
Continue this maintenance agreement and Jim Kuykendall seconded the
j motion. The motion was passed unanimously.
J Jim Kuykendall explained that back in January when this issue was
first brought to the board he had put a motion on the floor and it
died for a lack of a second and how critical he felt this issue
was to properly serve the various departments throughout the city.
Gary Collins discussed the criticality of some of the PCs and the
1
7 I
J
~w-+n
Q
r
age of the PCs and how some PCs have experienced failure. Jim ;
Kuykendall stated that in most cases these PCs are not only PCs but
also double as terminals for Departments to access the mainframe.
Charles Ridens asked if IBM could not refuse to service the PCs
that are broken and then placed under maintenance. Gary Collins J
M explained that IBM could ask to inspect the PCs before accepting
f them for maintenance and require us to have them operational before
acceptance on a maintenance contract. Bob Minnis asked if the
staff could not maintain these PCs. Gary Collins explained that
currently we do not have the staff to support this function for all
the various departments' PCs. Gary Collins also stated that he
would consider supplying this support if the Personal Computer
Analyst's position that has been requested in the last 2 Budget
Processes had been approved but cautioned that we would also have
to have a parts inventory, training for staff, and diagnostic
equipment. Charles Ridens ask if we could not piecemeal these
maintenance contracts since they were for various departments.
Gary Collins explained that under the new state law similar
contracts needed to be grouped and sent out for bid and that the ,
Purchasing agent was emphatic that we follow this process. Charles
Ridens stated that the cost of having someone perform this service
on a time and material basis is prohibitive due to the per hour
cost of service people. Jim Kuykendall made a motion the board
recommend that the city enter into a maintenance agreement with IBM
for all of the IBM PCs in various departments and Charles Ridens
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Gary Collins stated that when the City of Denton first looked at
the GIS system we were going to need 5 workstations. We initially
acquired 4 IBM RT model 125 workstations with the intent of
acquiring the 5th workstation at a later date. Gary Collins
explained how the D.P. staff could use the 5th workstation during
the implementation of the GIS software and database. Gary Collins
also explained that shortly after acquiring the GIS system IBM
announced a replacement machine for the RTs which was the RISC/6000
and it was 4 to 5 times as powerful as the RT. For a limited time
IBM is offering a 80% rebate of the RT purchase price if a customer
purchases a RISC/6000. Gary Collins explained that we had budgeted
$33,681 for the acquisition of the 5th GIS workstation and with the
808 rebate and the lower costs of the RISC/6000 we can upgrade the
4 existing workstations and acquire the 5th workstation for $1,351
leas than originally budgeted for the 5th RT. Charles Ridens asked
why IBM sold us the RTs if they knew the RISC/6000 were coming out.
Gary Collins responded that IBM had not announced the RISC/6000 at
the time we got GIS and therefore could not bid them. Bob Minnie
asked why they would offer this rebate and how we could get them
so cheap. Gary Collins responded that IBM was aggressively going
after the workstation market and the RISC/6090 was a new generation
of technology that made the cost less then the RTs. Brian Scott
made a motion that the board recommend the City acquire the 5th GIS
workstation and upgrade the existing 4 workstations to IBM
RISC/6000 and Charles Ridens seconded tfia motion.
4'05 s1 P..'+
+pp[7
1
Gary Collins explained we have had Courier equipment for quite a {
while and our problem in the past has been that not all of our JJ
equipment could be attached to the Courier controllers. Gary
Collins further stated that with the new Courier equipment being
bid at this time that problem no longer exists. Gary Collins
explained that most of the equipment being replaced was form 6 to
9 years old and some of the equipment was failing on a weekly if
not more frequent basis. Gary Collins went on to state that some
of the now equipment has a 3 year warranty and due to the age of
our current equipment the maintenance costs keep escalating. Gary
Collins explained that the city could replace this equipment and
place the new equipment on a 5 year lease/purchase agreement and
the additional costs would be $18.44 per month greater than the
maintenance costs on the current equipment. Gary Collins indicated +
that maintenance costs used in his analysis had a 10% per year
inflation factor and this was probably conservative since some of
the older equipment was experiencing a 159 per year increase. A
Brain Scott asked if all the equipment was IBM compatible and Gary
Collins responded it was totally compatible. Bob Minnie asked if
we currently leased this equipment and Gary Collins replied that
we currently own all of this equipment and just pay maintenance on ,
it. Gary Collins indicated that the cost of the lease purchase
reflected the trade-io allowance be applied to reduce the amount
being financed. Brian Scott asked why there was a difference
between the number of units of Courier and IBM. Gary Collins
responded that if we went with Courier we could use some of the I
newer Courier equipment and would not have to replace them but if 1
we went with IBM we would have to replace 6 more terminals and 2 r
more printers. Brian Scott made a motion that the city replace the
current terminals, controllers and printers with new terminals,
controllers and printers from Idea Courier and Bob Minnie Seconded
the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
i
There being no other business the meeting was adjourned.
j
I
I
1
{I
I
I ,
I ~
`r rune
f
DATES August 21,1990
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
f SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 098818 - IBM
RECOMMENDATION: we recommend this purchase order 098818 to 1BM be
approved in Elie amount of $32,330.00. The Data Processing
1[ Advisory Board recommends approval.
r SUMMARY: This Purchase Order is for the purchase of one IBM,
RT workstation model RISC/6000 and for the upgrade of 4 IBM RT
worrstations to the RISC 6000 models. These work stations are
part of the G.I.S. System and will complete the requirements for
five workstations,
These RT workstations are proprietary items and exempted from the
bid process as a high tech acquisition in compliance with state
law.
BACKGROUVU: Purchase Order 098818 to IBM, exert from Data
-
Processing Advisory Board Agenda Packet (Item 51, Price Quotation
from IBM.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMEIIT OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Information Services
Department and G.I.S. implementation.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase will come from G.I.S.
CertTCIcate of Obligation. Fund Account 0437-036-0176-9103.
Respectfully submitted:
~ I
1 J L1 d V. Harrell
City Manager
Prepared by:
TJame: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Purchasing Agent
TS/jh
045.DOC
ai o-al •
THIS IS A CITY of DENTON, TEXAS
CONFIRMING ORDER PURCHASE ORDER N0: PC Sd81d
This numtar must a0pjar an all
(IF MARKED) ovoicer. delivery slips cases,
DO NOT DUPLICATE 17 ctns dne , boxes, packing asps end tr lle.
Re4 No: Did No' ED Date! Oa 13 9 0 Page No. U 1
pURCHASfNO pARSIOM / 901 •a TEXAS STREET I DENTON, TEXAS 76201
VENDOR 61715666311 DIFW METRO 267.0042
NAME/ IEM DELIVERY CENTRAL ONLY SI1
P G BOX 660176 DATA PRCCaSSING
ADDRESS
DALLAS, TX. 77266 ADDRESS 9Jl D TEXAS 57
DENTUN9 TX 76201
DELIVERY QUOTED 30 90 FOB DESTINATION TERMS
VENDORNO, 11152500 09
VENDOR CATe i1 N / A 199106e000 19,106.00
CS L HA 7y, TV ! 205JS
STE4 UNIT 1
,5L5e000 1,516.00
02 1 EA ITY 0 20585 VENDOR CATe 8 N / A
TAPE
VENDOR CATe 9 N / A 19980.000 LsS80s00
03 1 EA CITY D 20566
OFTWARE FOR RISC/6000
EA ITY 0 20566 VENDOR CAT. i N / A 197I0e000 6,840.00
04 SOFTWARE REPLACE,NEYT FOR RIX/6000 UPGRADE OF IBM RTS TO RISC
G000 SYSTEM TAPt AND CD RCM
CREOIT FOR RT TKADE IN
2,888.00 2,868.00
005 1 EA DISPLAY
PACE GRAND TOTAL
437 036 017G 9103 32,330.00 32,330.00
Ol
VENDOR W IRUCT10NS: 3. Terms Net 30 IUnl,u a r ww rquMd l
1, lro9 df+ro'+e roscA4a1 -
! Bard gpinel FnCbe with dudfcete copy . 4. Shiptllrg Instructlona' F0.9. Destination p Paid IUo
2. Se Bil to - Accounts Payable 6, No federal or state mks lax shall be inchrded
215 E. WrAnney St. In a~af billed. Purchasing Divle an
t Denton, TX 76201
kI
t
MVi
c owe a.
7 yyy~~~
BACKGROUND INFORm,%TION
for Item 5
r When the CiLy of Denton decided to implement a GIS system with
counr_il approval, we determined the need for 6 workstations, At
the starL of the project only 4 workstations were acquired with the
itiLention of acquiring the 6th workstation at a later date once the
q CTS Data Base was built. At that time $330681 was budgeted for the
fifth workstaLton. Since that time a number of circumstances have
occurred that would make it advisable to acquire the fifth
workstntion. The original workstation selected were IBM RTs and
since Lint time IBM has introduced the RISC/6000. For a limited
time HIM is offering a BOX rebate of the cost of the RTs if a
ciistomer purchases a RISC/6000. The RISC/6000 is approximately 5
Limes more powerful than the RTs. Additionally it has become
afpnrent Lhat the Information Services Department could utilize the
fifth workstation in the implementation of the GIS system and the
creation or the 01S Data Base. The attached cost analysis shows
thnt, the City of Denton can upgrade the existing 4 RTs to RISC/6000
and acquire a 5th RISC/6000 for $1,351 less than originally
budgeted for the 6th RT.
OIS WousTATION COST COMPARISON
II'E~I UNIT TOTAL
QTY COST COST
WORKSTATION COSTS
6TH IBM RT 1 3316F1 33,681
TOTAL BUDGETED 1 33,611 33,681
IBM RISC/6000
NE14 WORKSTATION 1 25,490 25,490
UPORADE EXISTING RTS411710 6,840
J
TOTAL UPGRADE COST 5 27,200 32,330
SAVINOS 1,351
k ~ we mn~
~R 6nA:i kh "1 FI
I
U , 7 ' SO I 1 : 29 FP.011 I SH VnLLAS G/PS -fj26 FACE. 002
nlOrna 1oonal Bu+'n0-0 Machina3 CorpOr~Uon 15051BJ frQOWq J
0DO 75234
t Date: 8!7190 241868-4
Memo to: Gary Collins
' Director of IIS
City of Denton
Subject: H15C replacement
Dear Gary,
1 have reviowcd the pricing for the RT Migration Assistance
program and compiled the following information, ,I
HT invoice amount 27,072.00
6157 tape invoice amount 1,403.00
28,476,00
X.80
Total to apply to RISC1600 22,78000
Hardware for RISC16000
system
I tape
CD ROM 71,910.00
The entire cost of the RISC/6000
will W absorbed by the RT credit.
Software for each replacement
RISC/6000 11710.00
Dave's RISC/6000g no CD ROM 230610.00
software 1 980.00
Total for Dave's RISC/6000 2
! Total cost of replacing 4 RT's with 4 RISC/6000s and ordering and
E additional RSIC16000 isl 37,330.00
i i
Note that the RISC/6000 configured has only 2 serial ports and 1
pa,mltel port for device attachment. No other slots are available.
Please give me a ring If there are any other questions.
ten
Sincerely,
Dean A. Belvis '
Marketing Representative
i
:aia..• ~r.s. r~
■I
I
i
p
CITY
COUNCIL
1
~~app0 P C R oo
o~0 as ro}
0 'A
o
~e
0 "o. I IS
E 0~6`
~Q4ICOO N
t
T J
NVi a(
]t'MIIYY~ ~I
J.N} 1
J ■1
i
l
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Ordinance Prohibiting the Operation of Ultralight Aircraft or
Denton Municipal Airport.
RECOMMENDAI'ION:
It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Board and the Airport Manage:
to approve tnt Ordinance prohibiting the operation of Ultralight Aircraft or
Denton Municipal Airport.
SUMMARY_
There will be no cost to the City of Denton.
BACKGROUND:
Due to the slow, low altitudes and unstable flight of Ultralight aircraft
they do not commingle safely with the aircraft on Denton Municipal Airport
(see attachment Al.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
This agreement will not affect any other department or group.
FISCAL IMPACT:
i
None.
4Civ fully subitted:
I
a
Prepared by: nager
~loe Thompson
Airport Manager
Approved:
M
Rick Sve la
Deputy City Manager
f
II
h
f
I
I
i
~w♦
~WSwn1 1
i YY.:n~f~
• w IY
i TO: The Mayor and Mewbers of the City Council
FROM: Joe Thompson, Airport Manager
DATE: July 30, 1990
` SUBJECT: Ordinance Prohibiting the Operation of Ultralight
Aircraft on Denton Municipal Airport.
It is the recommendation of tu e Airport Board and Airport Staff
after reviewing the safety needs ca' Denton Municipal Airport
{ and in-depth discussion with the Federal Aviation Administration,
that the City Council adopt an Ordinance Prohibiting the
operation of Ultralight aircraft on the Denton Municipal Airport.
r
I
' f
j
r ~
l
1i
~ ~J
a ~
` I
s ~
J
ATTACHIIEN'T A
-C 011
CONCV RR ccS
pro.,rwSOL I
~i f • ~l
IN, r)1A LS410, 1
!f
.
OAT{
Mo T/w,OL
AUG 16 1989 L '')c
INITIAUAID.
Ms. Debra A. Drayovictb
City Attorney DAYS
Municipal Building
Denton, TX 76201 Ara {rw,OL
ITI
Dear Ms. Drayovietbi IN A L9410
your letter of July 27, 1989, requested our assistance with retard to DA,{
banning hot air balloons and ultralights from Denton Municipal Airport.
ATO.{Vw,OL
As you are ro doubt ewers, an airport owner is obligated to operate and
maintain the airport for the use and benefit of the flying public. INITIAL7/{Io
However, while the airport owner must allow its use by all types, kinds,
and classes of aeronautical activity an well as the general public DAT,
(pasesngers, visitors, etc.), the obligating agreements do provide for
exeeptlons, In the interests of flight safety, the airport owner may Pro{aw,OL
impose reasonable rules or regulation which restrict use. The owner Noy
establish such fair, equal, and Dot unjustly diserimieatory conditions to NITLL.,{iD
be met by all users of the airport as may be necessary for the safe and
affic ent operation of the airport. The owner say also prohibit or licit DAIS
any given type, kind, or class of aeronautical use of the airport-if such
action in necessary for the safe operation of the airport or necessary to ATO{rw{oL
serve the civil aviation needs of the public.
INITIAUnIo
The decision to licit or ban hot air balloon and ultralight traffic on the
f airport must be made by the city as owner of the airport. Such decision DA„
mat be made on the basis of safety`,- It is Southwest W policy
allow airport owners to exercise their own judgment RTO ITWOL
We will not go behind their decision unless there is evidence that a damial
was arbitrary or clearly unjustly discriaiastory without any operational Fo,, I.L {or safety consideration a the basis.
{
we are not in a position to advise on the type of document or carding of
same to be used in taking such action. We will, however, be happy to {rw.OL
review any proposal you wish to submit to this office and provide comments. .048
Notwithatanding the above, be advised that should the city take action to
ban say type, load, or class of aeronautical activity and should a formal DAY{ refrom acomplaint toemake tthe it win be above.s of[lea to conduct
OFFICIAL FILL COPY w VlOFO-'Tam-insw
/AA form 1360-14 l!-1111
I~
I
I
r
~A Iry H'. _
\ Ji-''+4liY~
w..r.
It you-bare questions on the above satterp please cell Mr. Cary Ewing at
(817) 624-5638.
8locerelyp
COO Bkk *#Aua
bill is -Howard
Hanagerp Airports Programing Branch
ASW--6311CEwiog:MsrilynR MS 734-563808/10/89INP/16431)
i
i
~ I
{.Vaw w. a
MINUTES
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
MAY 9, 1990
CHAIRMAN - DAVID ARNO
THE REG(TLAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVJLORY BOARD
MET WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 1990, AT 5:30 P.M., AT THE DENTJN MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING, DENTON, TEXAS.
MEMBERS PRESENT: George Gilkeson, Nancy Hundley, Allie
Miller, Rick Woolfolk and Gene Wright.
MEMBERS ABSENT: David Arno and Don Smith.
OTHERS PRESENT: Penny Britton, Fox-51; Pat Cannon,
North Texas Ballooning Association;
Jerry Drake, Assistant City Attorney;
Cary Ewing, F.A.A.; Jim Huff, Air
Denton, Inc.; Joyce Poole, Fox-51;
Tony Riley, Air Denton, Inc.; Rick
Svehla, Deputy City Manager; and Joe
Thompson, Airport Manager.
Acting Chairman Gene Wright, called the meeting to order.
I. Considered the minutes 'of the regular meeting of April
18, 1990. Minutes approved as written.
II. Public Session.
Pat Cannon, North Texas Ballooning Association, cliscusseO
the exclusion of the use and operation of Hot Air Balloons
at Denton Municipal Airport in reference to Draft N1
of the Airport Rules and Regulations. Mr, Cannon Informed
the Board the Hot Air Balloon pilots normally depart
the Airport at least 30 minutes prior to sunrise and
J are usually clear of aircraft traffic within five minutes
of departure, Mr. Cannon added that NTBA pilots are
required to attend certification programs in addition
to several safety seminars. Mr. Cannon requested
permission to use Denton Airport from 5:00 a.m. to 7:00
a.m. In order to prevent interference with aircraft
traffic. Gene Wright sugg.-sted that Joe Thompson, Airport
Manager, and Jerry Drakk3, Assistant City Attorney,
schedule a meeting with Mr. Cannon to review the general
guidelines and safety standards.
w T,as~
~at m c.~
I
Airport Board Minutes
May 9, 1990
"r Page 2
A general discussion concerning the operation of
Ultralights at D recommendedr that followed. Buse and operation
Airport Manager,
of Ultralights at Denton Municipal Airport be pt aibithat
due to safety considerations, and sugg s
Ultialight pilots use Lone Star Air Park, a considered only
Pilot
in tr an igemergencyrtsituation should angUltralight that
land at Denton Airport (i.e. engine failure). Gary Ewing,
FAA, stated that the FAA does not object to this
pilot ordinance, object uto the pointed ordi ance, the FAA wi ll be obligated
investigation. Council motion
that this ordinance be reviewed by the after
Jerry Drake, Assistant City Attorney, has rewritten the
ordinance to include Ultralight landings in emergency
situations. Allie Miller seconded the motion. Motion
was carried unanimously.
Rick Woolfolk made a motion to table Draft N5 of the
Airport Rules and Regulations, and requested that Joe
Thompson, Airport Manager, and Jerry Drake, Assistant
City Attorney, review the document for further alterations
or additions. Nancy Hundley seconded the motion. Motion
was carried unanimously.
RoFarm
Joe Thompson gave a grief Tupdate hompson nstathe tedAethat rial
ger
Service, Inc. request. Mr.
Krause President, Aerial Farm Service, Inc., requested
permission to operit,3 off Denton Airport on an "as needed"
basis to apply ftngicides and insecticides in the event
that inclement weather prevents equipment off a from
toperating furnsh
from a grass strip. Gary Ewing, FAA, Mr. Thompson with a sample Agricultural Lease to review.
Mr. Ewing also advised that a short-term lease for Aerial
Farm Service Inc. should bwritten. ae a Wright
short-term
requested that Mr. Thompson supply the Board
lease requirements concerning this issue for Board
J members to review.
I
` IeJa
M q.. y..;~, ~yYCi
I Airport Board Minutes
May 9, 1990 J
Page 3
sp-
Joe Thompson discussed the addendum to the Airport Jerry
I Escrow Agreement (Request No. 14015),
Drake, Assistant City Attorney. Mr. Thompson requested
that Mr. Drake furnish an Escrow Agreement that would
prevent potential lessees from icon-payment of their lease
agreements if the lessee backed out of a signed agreement.
i Mr. Drake stated that the same goals could be achieved ;
without an Escrow Agreement. George Gilkeson made a
I motion to recommend this issue to the City Council, with
the slight modification being that if the City fails
to comply within a reasonable time limit, that the mousy
be refunded. Rick Woolfolk seconded the motion. Motion i
was carried unanimously.
I
III. Airport Manager's Report. i
a. Revenue Detail - Joe Thompson distributed the 1990- j
91 Airport Revenue Detail Report in addition to the
Airport Monthly Billing Lease fees for Board Members
to review. Mr. Thompson slated that there was a delay ,
on the Monthly Expenditures hovenue report, and he will
be mailing the report to Board Members as soon as the
Accounting Department sends the statement to him.
b. Texas Department of Aviation - An overview of the
Texas Departmen Joe fThompson.~ Seminar,
Thompson l informed 9the
was given n by by as a
Board that because futuren deAirport is velopments cofsstheedai port
reliever airport, the FAA, and added that
will be dealt with directly by
the TDA does not deal with reliever airports. i
1
C, N.T.C.O.G. - Joe Thompson gave a brief update on
the Patatus of the Satellite Airport Development Project
Thompson
- J by the North Texas Council of Governments. Mr.
stated that the NTCOG has been granted funds by the FAA
to try and locate a satellite airport site that can be
developed to relieve Love Field and D/FW Airports.
Mr. Thompson distributed literature surrounding this
issue
could be considered cnsid redm a e suitable site for this project~enton
II
,I
I
'l
r
i
J!1f~-N! r
Airport Board Minutes
May 9, 1990
Page 4
1
General information included a discussion of the city
Council Budget Priorities Questionnaire. Joe Thompson
pointed out that the Airport was ranked low on the
priorities listing. Gene Wright suggested that the city
Council be made aware of the importance of the Airport
and asked that the Chairman, Dave Arno, schedule a meeting
between the Airport Advisory Board and the City Council.
Mr. Wright also suggested that the city Council be invited
to the Chamber of Commerce Mixer scheduled for August I
91 1990, at Fox-51. Mr. Wright stated that this function
would give Chamber of Commerce Members a chance to become
familiar with the Airport operations.
A list of the items permitted to discuss in Executive j
Session, requested by George Gilkeson, was distributed
for the Board members approval. The list was prepared
by Jerry Drake, Assistant City Attorney, who stated that
Advisory Boards, by law, are permitted to discuss any
topic they so choose.
With no further business, the Airport Board meeting was
adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
~ I
The next meeting is scheduled for June 20, 1990, at 5:30
p.m. In the Airport Terminal Building, Denton, Texas. 1
i
{I
r
1
i
I1 I
II
i
' 2904L {
ORDINANCE NO-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SEC. 3-14 OF CHAPTER 3 (AIRPORTS AND AIRCRAFT
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, BY PROHIBITING THE OPERATION OF ULTRA-
LIGHT AIRCRAFT ON THE CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND WITHIN
THE ESTABLISHED TRAFFIC PATTERNS OF THE CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL
AIRPORTt CONTAINING FINDINGS OF FACTS: PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON
VIOLATING THE TERMS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE DEEMED GUILTY OF A J
ANDEPROFINED IN VIDING N ANY SUM NOT MORE
DOLLARS CONVICTIO SHALL
EFFECTIVE DATE
THAN MISDEMEANOR TWO HUNDRED UPON
HEREOF.
WHEREAS, the City Manager and his staff have provided the City ,
the Council
n offultralight aircraft at reliever aitportal and safety hazards WHEREAS, after careful study, the Airport Advisory Board has
ultra-
the interest c of flight approve sathe fety regulation
protection
light aircraft a in the City
~ ig
of lives and propertyl and
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Denton makes the
following fin -Tinge of facts
A. The City of Denton owns and operates the City of
Denton Municipal Airport.
B. dThe es-
ignated y a oreliever airportabyAtheoFederal b Aviation
Administration.
C. The City of Denton Municipal Airport has in excess
of two hundred (200) based aircraft, and a high
activity of transient aircraft, and a high activity
of aviation instruction programs.
--1 D. Federal Aviation Regulations Part 103.17 prohibit
ultralight operations within an airport traffic
area without prior approval.
`
` E. The City Council of the City of Denton may estab-
lish such fair, equal and not unjustly discrimi-
typthe
natory
conditions pto be rohibit met by
airpor
or limit l any users given of
e*
arport, and may p
1
h
I
1
i
1
I
JY qr r. r.
1
P kind, or class of aeronautical use of the airport
if such action is necessary:
1. For same and efficient use of the airport=
2. To keep operation activities within ac-
ceptable noise levels1 or
3. To serve the civil aviation needs of the 1
public.
F. The City Council of the City of Denton finds, de-
clares, and determines that an unsafe condition may
be created by ultralight aviation activity on the ,
City of Denton Municipal Airport, and within its
traffic patterns, due to the speed, maneuverability,
and operational characteristics of the ultralight
aircraft, in relation to the predominant aeronauti-
cal activity at the City of Denton Municipal
Airport.
0. The City Council of tie City of Denton finds, de-
termines and declares that the operation of ultra-
light aircraft would create an unsafe condition,
and is not in the best interest of the safe and
efficient use of the airport, not will such opera-
tion serve the civil aviation needs of the public.
Section II. That Section 3-14 of Chapter 3 of the Code of
ordinances is h reby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 3-14. 9ltralight Aircraft.
(a) An ultralight aircraft is defined as an aircraft
which meets the requirements set forth in 14 CFR
103.11 as the same may be amended from time to time.
i
(b) No person shall operate an ultralight aircraft
on the City of Denton Municipal Airport.
_J (c) It shall be an affirmative defense to the pros-
ecution o4 an offense under subsection (b) if the
ultralight operator was experiencing engine failure.
Section III. Any person, as defined in section 1.07(27),
Texas ena code, who shall violate any provision of the ordi-
nance, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction
shall be punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars
' ($200.001.
I
PAGE 2
k
f
kk rIpJ .u-.w,~
3 '
Section IV. This Ordinance shall be effective fourteen (14)
days after is passage and approval. The city secretary shall
give notice of the passage of this ordinance by causing the cap-
tion hereof to be published in the official newspaper in the City
of Denton at least twice within ten (10) days after the passage
! of this ordinance.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990.
I
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
r ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRET%RY
1 BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
By: I JA 2'A''
I
i
PACE 3
ouw:an~
1
1
CITY
COUNCIL
XXT,
- -
~J d° s
a
~ja H 1 ~4~V\ i
~44Q G G ~j0
al! M
I m! a so
I
I
1
1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING THE 1990
APPRAISAL ROLL AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
1
SECTION,J. That the City Council hereby approves the 1990
Appraisal Roll for the City of Denton, Texas in the amount of
$1,970,935,351 assessed valuation, based on the Certified Appraisal
Roll as approved by the Appraisal Review Board of the Denton
Central Appraisal District.
SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of 1990.
iiBOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
ATTEST: I
JFVNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY ~l
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt J
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
f BYt
I
f
I
M
E
I
I
I
aw♦
01
CITY
COUNCIL '
~~p0609~ ° ~
00~4~ "a
0
4 ~
d
oa
r
i
r w nw^+
D1.1'6: 08/21/90 ,
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
-x~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
PROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT; 1991-1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public Utility Board
recommend approval.
SUMMARY:
The 1991-1995 CIP contains capital ixprovements to be undertaken by
the City of Denton for the next five years. The Utility and
General Government CIP's are provided separately and each has an
executive summary which Summarizes the CIP. Detail forms for each
Prefect are available in the City Secretary's office.
VCRGROUND:
The CIP development process followed a three step process of (1)
input from staff and the public, (2) consolidation and review by the
administrative staff and (3) consideration by PUB, P&Z, and the
Council. See the at'ached Calendar of Events.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Everyone using Denton's capital infrastructure.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Executive Summaries, pages 1-8 and 41-43.
Resp
lly submi t,d:
2eeg
Pre aced b
lov Harre I
C~ City Manager
J rank P.obhins, iC!'
J Ex?m:tive Direct,
Planning and Development
Attachments:
1. Resolution with CIP
2. PUB and P6Z Minutes
2346x
itArA+.Y
2856L
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROPOSED BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on the 18th day of July, 1990 the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended the capital impro7ements to be con-
structed during the forthcoming five year period; and
'ethe City
council onr the 2lsteday of pAugust,h1990;oandn
WHEREAS, all of the above actions were taken in compliance
with the requirements of Section 10.03(a)(6) of the city charter;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to formally adopt the rec-
ommendations of the Commission; NOW, THEREFOFE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the Council approves the attached list of
capital Improvements proposes to be constructed during the
forthcoming five year period.
SECTION Ii. That this resolution shall become effective
immediate y upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1990.
BOB _CANS TLEBERRY, MAX
ATTEST:
J JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
_J
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
{
,p+r'brv~1
4th Revision
July 23, 1990
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
CITY OF D MON
- FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
R AND FIVE YEAR GENERAL GOVERNMENT SCHEDULE
t
STEP 1 - iPipur
*February 14, 1990 (Wednesday) Planning f, Zoning Commission
(6 p.m.) holds joint meeting to hear
(Council Chambers) requests and receive input from
public, staff and other community
interests.
Februar; 23, 1990 (Friday) Staff back-up due manager's office
(staff analysis of requests, cost
estimates for proposed and existing
projects, location maps and ranking
sheet for new requested projects,
financial targets).
STEP 2 CONSOLIDATION AND MAN.4GEMF;Nr REVIEW
June 4, 1990 (Monday) Executive Committee reviews General
(3:00 p.m.) Government requests and begins to
(Civil Defense Room) formulate recommendation to be for-
warded to Planning and Zoning
Commission.
STEP 3 - CONS IDERATION/ADOP':ION
April 11, 1990 (Wednesday) PUB Final Recommendation
(5:00 p.m.)
(Civil Defense Room)
June 27 and (Wednesday) Planning and Zoning Commission
July 11, 1990 (Council Chambers) dicusses the CIP in Work Sessions
July 18, 1990 (Wednesday) Planning & Zoning Commission
(5;00 p.m.) holds a public hearing in a special
I (Council Chambers) meeting and considers a recommenda-
tion.
August 21, 1990 (Tuesday) Recommended five year CIP presented to
(Civil Defense Room) City Council for consideration.
3499R/4
I
I
I
I
~`A+M1 Y,^A
4 UTILITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
f '
4
M The 1991-93 Utility Department Capital improvements Plan ]s based on the
1991-93 Utility Department Planning Forecast, which projects a population
increase from 69,626 in 1991 to 77,048 in 1993. This represents an average
annual population growth rate of 2.1% per year. The majority of capital
C expenditures will be required to serve the new customers being added to the
systeml however, some expenditures are required to upgrade the Wastewater
Treatment Plant to meet the latest water quality regulations.
This year, the capital improvement Projects of the Community Services
Divisions are also included. These divisions are Solid Waste, which includes
r residential collection, commercial collection and disposals Equipment Services,
which includes Fleet Maintenance, Motor Pool and Machine Shops and
Drainage, which includes Street Sweeping. Since Urainage will continue to be
funded from General Government funding sources, this CIP budget will also be
I` reviewed as part of the City's General Government capital improvement
I I
I planning process.
I
This document is intended to serve as a guide as it relates to the capital
requirements of the Utility and Community Services Depvtments in their
efforts to maintain the high reliability and service quality of the Electric,
1
Water and Wastewater systems, and Community Service Divisions. However,
due to the nature of the utility business, a certain flexibUlty Is assumed within
the document in order to accommodate changes as they occur. The first year
f of the C1P, he., 19911 is fairly certain, but thereafter, adjustments may be
f necaaary In future CIP program to reflect the changing needs of the city.
i
i
f Page 1
I '
f
'I
f
I
General- Utilities and Community Services
The 1991-95 Five Year Utility System Capital Improvement Plan projects
expenditures of $129,623,000 for capital Improvements. This total includes
$46,828,000 for the Electric Department Improvementsl $40,451,000 for the
Water Departmentl $42,344,000 for the Wastewater Department. In addition,
$3,234,000 for Solid Waste and Community Services Admtnlstrationi $129,000
for Equipment Services and $7,335,000 for Drainage. For the Utility System,
the majority of the funds for capital Improvements will be from the future
sale of Utility Revenue Bonds, $92,500,000 and the use of existing revenue
bond sates, $12,1720000, with some funds being internally generated
$13,341,000 from rates with the remainder from "Aid in Construction"
$1,109,000 and other Miscellaneous Services $8,777,000 which are primarily
from prepaid fees to the City's Motor Pool.
The following is an overview of each Department CIP.
Electric Department
The Electric System will require $46.8 million In capital funds during the
1991-95 period. In accordance with the 1991-93 Forecast (hereafter referred
to as "the Forecast"), the Electric System expects 30121 new customers to be
sdded. Capital expenditures required for these customers and Improvements
to maintain reliable service to existing customers make up the majority of the
CIP projects.
One new substation will be completed in 1991 at a total cost of $1,000,000 of
which $860,000 will be expended in 1990, and will be doubted In size in 1995 at
a cost of $6009000. $970,000 will be used for load management programs
during the 1991.1995 period. A portion of the overhead lines (.5 miles per
year) wil! be converted
Page 2
•ALV~ 1
h~ AI tiM.,r~
9aJ.n~
to underground as part of the City beisulificatIon program at a cost of
$300,090 per year. A special overhead to underground electrical conversion
project ($2.1 mlUlon) Is also included for the area on Unlversiiyr between 1-35 +
and Bell Avenue In 1992.
Two hydroelectric units (one each at Lake Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville)
will be completed In 1991 at an estimated total cost of $3,064,000 for
Lewisville and $3,836,000 for Ray Roberts. Additional building space for a
Central Dispatch facility and Electric Department personnel will be
i
constructed in 1992 at an estimated cost of $1,300,000. A combined cycle '
generating unit is projected for 1993 at an estimated cost of $16,000,000. A
detailed Dating is found at the end of this section.
Electric: Department-Funding
Funding for the electric projects will be provided from four main sourcess
1. Bond funds, $37.643 million
2. Current revenues, $7.326 million i
3. Ald-In-Construction, $0.340 million
4. Other sources, $1.506 million
Elecuk bond sales are estimated to be $32.3 mUlion.
•
filectrk Department-Rate Inawa
( Based on a forecasted energy growth rate of 2.1% to 2.6% and an Inflation
rate of approximately 3%, the Electric Department anticipates the following
rate IrKreasav
92 93 9i 93
21
lnereaM 0 2% 0% 5% 7%
These increases are primarily due to increases In the cost of Fuel U.e., 9.36%
areal increase In natures} gas) and Purchased Power which make up .
approximately 68% of the Electric Department budget. The annual debt
service payments represent 6.9% of the Electric
Page 3
1
..r. I
MIA
i
WII0 V
Oepariment budget in 1991 and increase to 7.3% in 19930 with the increase
primarily due to the proposed S16,000,000 investment in 1993 of a 30 MW
- repowering of the City's Spencer Generating Plant. The funds for capital
improvements derived from current revenue range from 1.6% of budget in
1993 to 2.5% In 1993.
Water Department
The Water Utility will add an estimated 1,947 customers during the planning 1
period (from 18,142 in 1991 to 20,089 In 1993) and will have an average annual
customer growth rate of approximately 2.4%.
i
To provide adequate water service, it is antlcipatei that $40,43 million capital
funds will be required over the next five years. The major projects will be the
addition of a ten million gallon per day (MGD) water plant and water
transmission line, at an estimated cost of 518,183 million of which it Is
assumed that the Upper Trinity Regional Water District will fund 49%, one 2
MGD elevated storage tank at a cost of $2,403 million, and the replacement of
j miscellaneous water lines for a cost of $2,419 million. The new water
t: eatment plant will Increase the maximum capacity to 40 MGD. A detailed ~I
listing Is located at the end of this section.
i
I Water Department-Funding
Funding for the water prolrcu has four major sourcest
1. Bonds, $28.237 million
j 2. Current revenue, $4.390 million
3. Aid-in-Construction, $0.624 million
4. Other, $6.897 million
1
Water bond sales are estimated to be $23,000,000.
I
Page 4
j
. 1
I
1
Water Department-Rate Increases
- It is anticipated that the Water Department will require rate increases of
1
9l 92 93 94 93
Increase 12% 12% 12% 9% 1 ~
These increases are primarily due to increased costs associated with the
payments for the Ray Roberts project, debt service for the new water plant
and associated transmission line, the 2 My elevated storage tank and the
Hartlee Field Rd. Booster Pump Station with ground storage tanks. The ,
$353,000 per year repayment of an outstanding $4.0 million water/wastewater
debt to the Electric Department will be postponed during 1991 and 1992.
Wastewater Department
The Wastewater Department will add an estimated 1,603 customers during the
planning period. The customer count will increase from 13,042 in 1991 to
16,643 In 1993.
Improvements and replacements to the Wastewater System are protected to
cost $42.344 million. Major capital items include expansion of the Wastewater
Plant from 12 to 0 MGD at an estimated cost of $24.910 million, oversize
sewer lines at a cost of $1,000 million, replace obsolete sewer Linea at a cost
of $2.076 mLillan, implement an Infiltration/inflow correction program ($1.23
mililortl, upgrade several lift stations ($0.4% mWlon), the fwWLtg of
` development plan wastewater Una ($1.23 million) and purchase miscellaneous
k equipment 00.107 million). A detalied ilsting is located at the and of this
sectiee.
I
V
Page 5
I~
h
I
I
br r1 .
{~yry YJT'~'9T'.~
Wastewater Department-Funding
Funding for the wastewater projects will be provided from four main sourcest
P 1. Donds, $38.194 million
2. Current revenue, $3.631 million
3. Aid-in-Construction, $0.143 million
4. Other, $0.374 million
Wastewater bond sales are estimated to be $37,000,000.
Wastewater Department Rate Inaeasd
It is anticipated that the Watpr Department will require rate Increases of
41 92 93 94 93
Increase 9`b 12% 12% 12% 12%
'T'hese rate increases are primarily the result of the required Wastewater
Treatment Plant expansion.
Solid Waste Division
The Solid Waste Division is estimated to have Increasing service requirements
equal to the rate of population growth, l.e., approximately 2.0 to 2.1%.
Although the long range plans for the Solid Waste division are not iMalized at
the present time, for purposes of this plan, it was assumed that the city would
remain In the business of collecting all residential solid waste, the same
Page 6
• m,uu~
phase of the commercial solid waste as in 1990 and that' the city would "
continue to provide solid waste disposal for its own collection services, plus
30% which presently represents the contract haulers' volumes. This scenario
necessltates the development of another landfill site by 1994, since Denton's
present site only has 1,2001000 cubic yards of volume available, and total
annual fill rate is presently 300,000 cubic yards, i.e., residential 909000 cubic
yards, commercial 100s000 cubic yards, contract haulers, 100,000 cubic yards
and miscellaneous 10 to 20,000 cubic yards. U a different long range scenario
is implemented, tine proposed CIP will need to be modified.
i
The improvements and replacements required by the Solid Waste Division and
Community Service Acministration is S41,263,000 during the Five Year CIP
period.
The major expenditures are tot mobile equipment, $1,364,000, new
land fi11,36,000,000 (1993), front load equipment for commercial collection,
51830000, and curbside recycling, $93,000.
1
Solid Waste Division-Funding
Funding for the Solid Waste projects will be provided from three main sources&
1. Bonds, $6 million
2. Current revenue, $363,000
3. Other, $1.646 million
}
Sold Waste Dlvlslon-Rate 4tcraases
Present residential rates are $9.39 per 30 day period. Since a high degree of
uncattalnty exists about the long range plans of the Solid Waste Division, no
ptojectlons were developed for future rates.
Page 7
1
i
Equipment Services Division
The Equipment Services Division, which includes Fleet Maintenance, Motor
t Pool and Machine Shop, is estimated to have capital requlrements of $129,000
over the 1991 to 1997 time period. These expenditures are primarily for fleet
replacement and machine shop tooling and are expected to be primarily funded
from current revenue derived from the rates charged to the various divisions
and departments for garage and machine shop services.
i
i
s }
i
672701.8
Page 8
i
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
20-Apr-90 1951 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
05141 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
0 X 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR. OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 91
91-0251-01 IMPROVEMENTS TO REDUCE CYCLING I $155 $0 $155 $0 $0
91-0251-02 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 15 0 15 0 0
91-0251.03 OFFICE/FACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTU 16 0 16 0 0
91-0251-04 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 105 0 l05 0 0
91-0251-05 OVERHAUL UNIT 3 TURBINE/GENERATO 26S 0 0 0 285
91-0251-06 LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 175 175 0 0 0
91-0251-07 RAY ROBERTS HYDROLICTRIC - 370 370 9 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION $1,121 $545 $291 SO $285
91-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET 1IGHTING $79 $it $0 $47 $0
91.0258.02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL 173 173 0 0 0
91-PISB-03 STREET LIGHTING - SECURITY 35 0 35 0 0
91-0..'-04 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN S 0 5 0 0
SUS-TOTAL ELECT STREET LIGHTS 292 205 40 47 0
91-0252-01 0/8 EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVEMENTS $452 $452 $0 $0 $0
91-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $100 100 0 0 0
91-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVE $617 617 0 0 0
91-0252.04 TRANSFORMERS 6 EQUIPMENT $621 621 0 0 0
91-0252-OS MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT $178 0 56 0 122
91-0252-06 NISCLLLANE(WS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $60 0 80 0 0
91-0252-07 RIGIT-OF-WAY CASEMENTS $50 0 50 0 0
91-0252.08 ECONOMIC FSRDER CONDUCTOR RIPLAC $170 0 170 0 0
91-0252-09 ON TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS $300 0 300 0 0
91-0252-10 MOBILE DATA TERMINALS $26 0 26 0 0
91-0252-11 PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC FACILIT199 $500 S00 0 0 0
91-0252.12 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIP/FURNI $5 0 5 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 3,099 21290 687 0 122 ~i
91-0253-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $90 $54 $36 $0 $0
91-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 153 15 0 7 0 8
91-02:3-03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 1B 0 l8 0 0
91-0253-04 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ISO 150 0 0 0
91-0253-05 MOBILE DATA TERMINALS 27 0 27 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 300 204 SB 0 8
Page 9
II~
I
V
CAPITAL IMPROVEK T PROJECT - f ,
-Apr-
05141 AN 4772 CARIT
ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
PROJECT J
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN
TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 91
MOBILE DATA REPEATER $30
91.0254-02 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS & EQUIPMENT $20 $30 $0 $0 SO
91-0254-03 TELEPHONE INTERCONNECT SYSTEM. $76 0 36 0 26 0 0
91-0254-04 SHOP CEILING INSTALLATION 0 0
91-0254-05 PURCHASE VEHICLE 5401 $8 0 8 0 0
91-0254-06 SOOMHZ SECURLNET $I3 0 1J 0 0
91-0254-07 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR COHTRO $40 !0 19 0 0
...........40 ......0_ .
.
SUB-TOTAL ELECT COMMUNICATIONS 184 46 136 0 ---..0
91-0255.01 AUDRA SUBSTATION CONSTRUCTION $140 $140 $0 $O $0 I ~
91-0255-02 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS $82 82
91-0255-03 SCADA EQUIPMENT $50 O D 0
91-0255.04 SUBSTATION SCREENING (AIRPORT) $75 75 5G C 0
91-0255-05 PURCHASE COMMERCIAL RIDING LAWNH $14 0
91-0255-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT $25 00 14 0 0
25 p .
SUB-TOTAL ELECT SUBSTATIONS 3E6 297 89
0 p
I
91-0250-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/F $78 $0 $76 $0 $0 J
91-0250-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $15 0 B 0 7
91-0250-03 CIS $40
.....40
SOB-TOTAL ELECT AIWINISTRATION 133 0 126 0
-
REVISED TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1991 CIP 5,515 3,589 1,457 47 427 E
J I
_J
f
Page 10
I
4
r r
_ CAP TAL IMPRQVEMENT f,ROJFCT
20-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
05A41 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
X 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC OTHER
I~ FISCAL YEAR 92
1
I
92.0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $30 $0 $30 $0 $0
I 92-0251-02 OFFICEIFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTV $17 0 17 0 0
92-0251-03 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $46 0 35 0 11
91-0251-04 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT $270 0 270 0 0
92.0251-05 OVERHAUL UNIT No. 4 TURBINE GENE $195 0 0 0 195
92-0251.06 CHEMICAL CLEANING BOILERS N0,16 $120 0 0 0 120
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 618 0 352 0 326
92-0258.01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $91 $0 $37 $55 $0
- 92-0256-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL $159 159 0 0 0
-
92-0258-03 STREET LIGHTING - SECURITY $40 - 0 40 0 0
SUB TOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTS 291 159 77 55 0
E
92-0252.01 ON EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVEMENTS $444 $444 $0 $0 $0 1
92-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $105 $105 $0 $0 $0 1
92-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVE $716 $716 $0 $0 $0 1
92.0252-04 TRANSFORMERS 6 EQUIPMENT $638 $636 $0 $0 $0
92.0252-05 MOTOR•POOL REPLACEMENT $226 $0 $91 $0 $137
92-0252-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $100 $0 $100 $0 $0
92-0252-07 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $55 $55 $0 $0 $0
92-0252.08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLAC $205 $20S $0 $0 $0
92-0252-09 0/8 TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS $2,400 $2,400 $O $O ..--SO
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 4,691 4,563 191 0 137
1
92-0253.01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $106 $67 $39 $0 $0
1 92-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 39 0 9 0 30
32-0253.03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 20 0 20 0 0
92-0253-04 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 165 0 165 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 330 67 233 0 30
Page 11
CAPJT.AL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
OSi41 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
(s x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
r
FISCAL YEAR 92 k[
92.0254-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT $20 s0 $20 $O $O `
92.0254-02 RADIO INTECONNECT THPA, BRAZOS, $30 $O 430 30 $O
92.0254-03 AUTOMATIC VEHICLE LOCATION 430 $O $30 $O SO
92.0254-04 REPLACE S.C.A.D.A. CRT$$ 420 $O $20 80 $0
1 92-0254-05 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTRO $40 $O $40 $O S6 ;
SUB TOTAL ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION 140 0 140 0 0
i
M
92-0255-01 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS $86 $86 $0 30 30
92-0255-02 REPLACE SUBSTA. EMERG. INTERPHON IS 0 15 0 0
92-0255-03 TRANSFORMER MOBILIZATION 100 100 0 0 0
92-0255-04 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT #55 14 0 7 0 7
92-025S-05 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 30 0 30 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 245 186 52 0 7
I
91-0150-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/F 4180 s0 $180 $0 SO !
92-0250-02 MOTOR POOL 15 0 15 0 0
92.0250-03 GIs 45 0 45 0 0
92.0250.04 NEW SERVICE FACILITY 1,500 1,500 0 0 0
.
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC ADM. MISC. 1,740 1,500 240 0 0'
TOTALS FOR YEAR 1992 CIP 80315 6,475 1,285 55 500 E
4
i
I
Page 12
I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FRWECT
20-Apt-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
05141 AN ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
• ...........................X.10003.................
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC OTHER
1 FISCAL YEAR 93
If` I
I
93-0251.01 GAS PIPELINE $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0
93-0251-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 11 0 3 0 8
93-0151-03 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS SO 0 50 0 0
93-0251-04 OFFICEIFACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTU l8 0 18 0 0
93.0251-05 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS ISO 0 150 0 0
93.0251-06 OVERHAUL UNIT No. 5 TURBINE GENE 210 0 0 0 210
F SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 1,439 1,000 221 0 218
93-0258-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $124 $0 $50 $74 $0
93-0256-02 STREET LION?$ - ARTERIAL 58 58 0 0 0
93-0258-03 STREET LIGHTING - SECURITY 45 0 45 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTI 227 S8 95 74 0
E
i
i
93-0252-01 ON EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVEMENTS $445 $445 $0 $0 $0
93-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS $110 $110 $0 $0 $0
93-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVE $857 $657 $0 $0 $0
93-0252-04 TRANSFORMERS & EQUIPMENT $948 $758 $190 $0 $0
93.0252-05 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT $91 $0 $33 $0 $58
93-0252-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND IQUIPMEN $125 $0 $125 SO SO
93.0252-07 RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS $60 $0 $60 $0 $0
93.0252-08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLAC $210 $210 $0 $0 $0
93.0252-09 010 TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS $300 $300 $0 $0 $0
SOB-TOTAL. ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 3,146 2,680 408 0 S8
93.0253-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $130 $78 $52 $0 $0
93-0253-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 27 0 9 0 16
93-0253-03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 23 0 23 0 0
` 93-0253-04 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 175- 175 ...-0 - 0 ..-.0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC MITERING 355 253 84 0 18
I
I
4 Page 13
fI
t I
I
I
~ I
4 ~
11YA r.a
I
° ~ CAPIT PA MI ROVEMENT PROJECT _
~ 20-Apt-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PL
20 AN
05A41 90 ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT `
(S X 1000)
BOND CURRENT AID•IN
PROJECT TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC OTHER
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FISCAL YEAR 91
93.0254-01 MISCELLANL WS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT $25 $O 5450 $00 500 `
93-0254-02 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTAO 40 0 i5 I
93-0254-03 REPLACE VEHICLE 5420 15 0 0 0
91.0154-04 UTILITY DISPATCH RADIO b TLLEPHO 7 0 7
...............o-
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC Cot"ICATION 87 0 72 0 15
1
93-0255.01 K,"OAY SUBSTATION ACB RETROFIT $188 $188 $0 $O SQ i
93-0155-02 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS 90 90 0 0
93-0155-01 EXTEND VTR/SYR FACILITIES TO AIR ^.0 20 4G G 0
93-0255.04 PURCHASE TRACTOR FOR SUBSTATIONS 40 0
93.0255-05 MISCELLANLOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 30 0 30 0 8
..-....6
93-0155.06 1408ILS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 055 16 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS -...384• 298 78 0 8
3
93-0250-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/F 965 $0 $85 $0 $O I
.
93-0150-02 CIS 50 0 S0 0 0
. {
0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC ADM. MISC. 135 0 135
TOTALS POR YEAR - 1993 CIF 51773 4,269 1,093 74 317
i
Page 14
i
i
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _
20-Apt-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
05141 AN ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 94 ;
i
94-0251-01 POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS $50 $O $50 $O $O
94-0251.02 OFFICE/FACILITY EQUIPMENT, F1XTU 19 0 19 0 0
94-0I51-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 16 0 4 0 12
94.0251-04 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 900 0 900 0 0
'
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 985 0 973 0 12
I
+I
i
94-0259-01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING $132 $O 453 $79 $O
94.0159-02 STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL 29 29 0 0 0
•
94-0258-03 STREET LIGHTING - SECURITY -_..50 - 0 SO 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTS 211 29 103 79 0
94.0252-01 ON EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVEMUTS $556 9556 90 SO $O
94.0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 120 120 0 0 0
94-0252-03 UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVE 945 945 0 0 0
94-0252-04 TRANSPORKERS i EQUIPMENT 960 960 0 0 0
94-0252-05 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 69 0 13 0 56
94-0252-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN 130 0 130 0 0
94-0252-07 RICBT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS 65 65 0 0 0
94-0252-08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLAC 215 215 0 0 0
94-0252-09 O/H TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS 300 300 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIAUT10N 3,360 3,161 143 0 56
94.0253-01 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $132 $79 $53 $O SO
94-025:-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 30 0 16 0 14
94-0253.01 REPLACE MET*JI TESTSOARD 50 50 0 0 0
94-0253-04 LOAD MANACEML'.T PROGRAM L85 185 0 0 0
1 94-0253-05 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 20 0 20 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC METERING 417 314 89 0 14
Page 15
i
I
! ' !r _ CAPITAL IMPR0 ffjg r P80JECT - J
20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
I OS141 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
i
E 1000)
ll
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION
r TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR.. OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 94
r
94.0254-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN $25 $0 $25 $0 $0 1
94-0254-02 RADIO EQUIPMENT CAPACITOR CONTRO 40 0 40 0 0
94-0254-03 REPLACE VEHICLE 5404 15 0 0 0 15
94-0254-04 REPLACE VINTAGE RADIO REPEATERS 60 60 0 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION 140 60 65 0 15
94-0255-01 RETROFIT BREAKERS (LOCUST NORT $260 $260 $0 $0 $0 i
` 94-0255-02 REPLACE 69 KV BREAKERS 95 95 0 0 0
94.0255-03 INSTALL YTR/SNR AT NORTHLAKES 9U 10 10 0 0 0
94.0255-Or MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 4 EQUIPMENT 30 0 30 0 0
94-0255.05 MOBILE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 155 20 0 10 0 10
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 415 365 40 0 10
94-0250-01 94-0250-02 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/F $90 $0 $90 $0 SO MOTOR POOL 16 0 8 0 8
94-0250-03 CIS 60 0 60 0 0 {
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC ADM. MISC. 166 0 158 0 B
hI 1
TOTALS FOR YEAR 1994 CIP 5,694 3,929 1,571 79 115
I
I •
I ~ I
~ I 1+'1II
I 1
I I
Page I6
I
'I
"i
1^
AP iMP V P T
720;-Apr-90'
1995 CA
PITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
......................(!.,X_1000)
................NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN
TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR
UC OTHER
I
FISCAL YEAR 95
95-0251-01 GAS
BINE COMBINED 95.0251-02 POWER PLANT LQUIPNENTCANDLTOOLg !16,075 $16,000 $p $0 $O
95-0251.03 OFFICE/IACILITY EQUIPMENT, FIXTU 115 75 0 TS 0 0
95.0251-04 POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 0 20 0 0
0 115 p 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTR
IC PRODUCTION 16,210 16,000 270 . - •
0 p
I
95-C258.01 RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING
95-0258-02 STREET LIGHTS • ARTERIAL $142 $O $57 $85 $0
95.0258-03 STREET LIGHTING - SECURITY 283 285 p 0 0
53 0 53 p 0
9U6-TOTAL ELECTRIC STREET LIGHTI 480
285 110 .....BS. •-0
95-0252-01 0/11 EXTENSIONS 6 IMPROVEMENTS $496 $496 $0 $O 50
95-0252-02 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS
9S-0252-03 UNDERGROUND "TENSIONS 6 IMPROVE 9125
59 125 0 0 0
95-0252-04 TRANSFORMERS 6 EQUIPMENT 0 959 0 0
95-0252-05 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT 1,172 1,000 0 0 0
95-0252-06 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN 135 0 65 0 101
95-0252-07 RIGaT•OI-WAY EASEMENTS 0 135 0 0
75
95-0252.08 ECONOMIC FEEDER CONDUCTOR REPLAC 12
5 225 TS 0 0
95-0252-09 011I TO UNDGCROUND CONVERSIONS 300 300 0 0 0
0 0 0
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 3
48•1 •2.146 1,234 ' ~ ,234 0 ...107
v
I
)S-0253-01 MITERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT $144 487 $57 $O
J 95.0153 .02 MOTOR POOL REPLACEMENT 17 0 4 13
95-0253.03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS AND EQUIPMEN 20 0 20 0 13
95-0253-04 LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 0 0
....195. 195 p p .
` SUS-TOTAL ELECTRIC METERING - -
M 316 26 2 81 0 --•-13
I
Page 17
F
E
I
I
I
I
9
y I
a
-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRWiCCT
20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
05,41 AM ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT J
X 1000) J
1 i PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUC 07NEA
FISCAL YEAR 95
95-0154-01 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 930 $0 $30 $O $0
95-0254-02 RADIO EQUIPMENT CO.PACITOR CONTRO 40 40 0 0 0
9S-0254-03 MAIN CATE RADIO CONTROLLED CAMER 4 0 4 0 0 E
95-0254.04 ENLARGE RAD10 SHOP AREA 6 0 6 0 0
i
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION SO 40 40 0 0
3
95-0255-01 DUPLEX AUDRA SUBSTATION
95-0255-02 BATTERY REPLACEMENT - NORTHLAKES $6010 0 $610 $0 $0 $
0
95-0255-03 MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 30 0 30 0 0
I
SUBTOTAL ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 640 610 30 0
0
95-0250-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/► 595 $O $95 $O 50
95-0250-02 MOTOR POOL
9S-02SO-03 CIS 38 0 0 32
6S 0 65 S 0 0
SUB-TOTAL ELECTRIC ADM, MISC. 196 0 166 0 32
I
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 21,531 19,363 1,931 85 152
I
GRAND TOTALS 1991 - 1995 CIP 46,823 37,645 7,337 340 1,506
I ~
1 '
i
i
i
I
I,
- _J
Page 18
t i
F
' j CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJEC f
{
1991 . 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
20-Apr•90 WATER DEPARTMENT
10013 AM J
(S x 1000)
BOND CURRENT AID•IN
PROJECT TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR. OTNER'
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FISCAL YEAR 41
91.0450.01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMLNT/FUR $3 SO $3 $O ••--$O~
1
~
SUS•TOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION ] 0 3 0 0'
I
WTA FACILITI $9,834 $4,505 $O SO $40210
91.0460-01 RAY ROBERTS WTP 6 RAW /]9 9 619 0 0 1`1
91.0460.02 FINISB WATER TRANSMISSION LINE
91.0460-03 BOOSTER STATION & SYSTEM TIE-111 5,]14 5,3160 4 0 0
91-0460.04 OFFICE FURNITURE p
91-0460.05 NEW CONTINUOUS TURBIDITY NONITORIN 13 C 1S 0 O`
91.0460.06 SAFETY CLINSING DEVICES TO ELEVATE S 5 0.
91.0460-0 NEW PORTABLE ADIG9 (2) 6 PORtAILE j 7 0 7 1
91-0+~60.O9 MOBILE LE EQUIPMENT 2
10,460 46 0 4,547
SUBTOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 15,05
91-0410-01 LABORATORY CASEWORK MAINTENANCE $3 $O $3 $00 Soil
91.0460.02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SY 1 0 1
91-0460-03 REPLACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPLCTROP 22 220 0 0 0j1
91-0410-04 PORTAILE FIELD GENERATOR 16 0 1 0 B,,
91-0480.05 MOBILE EQUIPMENT (R)
• `
SUS-TOTAL WATER LABORATORY 43 21 13 0 S
91-0463.01 CIS $10 Sc $10 $0 ' $01
91-0463-02 FIELD EQUIPMENT 1 0 1 •.•••O
91-0463.03 OFFICE EQUIPMpOT AND FURNITURE 2 0 2 0
i O
S06-TOTAL WATER ENGINEERING 17 0 13 0
i
r
f
Page 19
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -J
I
20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CA:ITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
10,13 AM HATER DEPARTMENT
■ 1000)
PROJECT BOND CVRAINT AID-IN
NUMBIA PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVEHUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 91 "'wl
{
91-0461.01 OVERSIZE WATER LINES 5150 $150 90 $O $01
91-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 80 0 33 0 471
91-0461.03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS 180 0 0 180 01
91-0461-04 REPLACE FIRE NnWTS b VALVES 52 0 S2 0 01
91.0461.05 RIPLACI WATER LINE STREIT PROGP.AM 200 0 200 0 O~
91-0461-06 REPLACE /tSC. WATER LINES 46 0 48 0 0
91-0461-07 MISC. EQUIPMENT 25 0 2S 0 01
91-0461-08 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM nPOWS WATER 1S$ ISS G 0 0
91-0461-09 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INPILL ISO 0 ISO 0 0
91.0461-10 DEVtLOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 250 2SO 0 0 0
91-0461.11 MOBILE DATA TERMINALS 35 0 35 0 0
91-0461-12 FLOW MITERS (Rats of Flov) 25 0 25 0 0
90-0461-XX REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES 279 279 0 0 0
SUB TOTAL HATER DISTRIBUTION 1,624 834 566 180 47
91-0462.01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $17 $O $17 $0 $0~
91-0462-02 WATER MITERS 114 0 114 0 o l
MISCELLANTOUS EQUIPMENT 5 0 5 0 0
91-0462-04 MOBILE DATA TERMINALS 20 0 20 0 0
SUB-TOTAL WATER METERING 156 0 156 0 0
r
TOTAL 1991 CRP 16,897 11,316 799 180 4,602
1
i
I
i
i
Page 20
• v
CAPITAL IMPIRM-MENT PROJECT
J
.APT. - OYEM H7 AN - -lin
10,13 AM WATER DEPARTMENT
x 1000)
3 PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE .CONSTR. OTHER;
PISCAL YEAR 92
92-0450.01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FUR $4 90 34 $O $0
SUBTOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION 4 0 4 0 0'
91-0460-02 FINISH WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 84,972 $3,729 80 $O $1,243
92-0460-01 DISINFECTION SYSTEM MODIFICATION 400 400 0 0 0'
92-0460-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 24 0 14 0 10~
92-0460-03 OFFICE FURNITURE S 0 5 0 0
92-0460-04 PIGGING RAW WATER LINES 300 300 0 0 0!
92-0460-05 2 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK 2,400 2,400 0 0 01
SUB-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 8,101 6,829 19 0 1,253
92-0480.01 LABORATORY CASEWORK MAINTENANCE $2 80 82 80 $0!
92.0480-02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SY 2 0 2 0 Ot
92-0480-03 GAS CHROMATOGRAP AASS SPECTROPHOT 21 21 0 0 0
92-0480-04 RESERVOIR MONITORING EQUIPMENT' 14 0 14 0 0
92-0480.05 WATER DISTILLATION UNIT 1 0 3 0 0
92-0480-06 LABORATORY SINK FUME HOOD 2 0 2 0 0!
SUB-TOTAL WATER LABORATORY 4q 21 23 0 0i
92-0463.01 015 8S 80 85 80 80!
92-0463.02 FIELD EQUIPMENT 1 0 1 0 0
92-0463-03 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE 1 0 1 0 0
SUB-TOTAL WATER ENGINEERING 7 0 7 0 0
92-0461.01 OVERSIES WATER LINES $150 $150 0
$O SO
92-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 109 0 51 0 58
92-0461.03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS 94 0 0 94 0~
92-0461-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS 4 VALVES 58 0 58 0 0
92-0461-05 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET PROGRAM 200 0 200 0 0'
I 92-0461-06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES 54 27 21 0 0
-J 92-0461-07 MISC. EQUIPMENT 1S O 15 0 0
92-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 250 250 0 0 0
92-0461.09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 250 250 0 0 0
92-0461-10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INFILL ISO 0 ISO 0 0
91-0461.06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES 274 137 137 0 0
91-0461-08 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 900 900 0 0 0
1 SUBTOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 2,504 1,714 638 94 S8
f Page 21
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ ~l
20'APr' CAPITAL IKYROVEMENT PLAN
10113 AN WATER DEPAATIIENT
1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHR
FISCAL YEAR 92
I
92.0462-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $17 $0 $9 $0 !8I
92-0462-02 WATER METERS 120 0 120 0 O~
92-0462-03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 4 0 4 0 Or
li
SUB-TOTAL WATER METERING 141 0 133 0 8~
i
TOTAL 1992 CIP 10,801 8,564 824 94 1,319
J
1
i
I
i
i
Page 22
f
I
ra ,
y ,
CAPITAL IMPR~V uGUT LIDA ieCT
s - ~
10,13 AM WATER DEPARTMENT
(S a 1000
NUM:ER PAO3ECT DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN
PROJECT FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER,
TOTAL
FISCAL YEAR 93
93-0450.01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FUR $5 $0 1
93.0450-02 NEW COMPUTER $g $$0 S5 $0 $0
.....58. . 50
SUB-TOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION 13 0 13 0 .....o
93-0460-01 NEW ROOSTER PUMP UPPER PRESSURE PL 65 $65 $0 $0 S0
93-0460.02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT
93-0460-03 0I►ICZ FURNITURE 3S 0 4 0 311
93-0460-04 COOLS 6 EQUIPMENT 20 0 20 0 OI
93-0460-05 OZONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM 2S 0 25 0 0'
'
450 340 0 110
.O.
SUB-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION
545 405 49 0 141
I
93-0480-01 LABORATORY CASEWORK MAINTENANCE 3
93-0480-02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SY 1 $0 $1 $O 01
93.0480.03 REPLACEMENT OF LABORATORY EQUIPMEN 7 0 0.
93-0480-04 WATERSHED MONITORING STATION 6 1 0 0
5 0 0 0
93-0480-05 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING RENOVATION 21 5 0
....71 ......0
SUB-10TAL WATER LABORATORY 37 27 16 ......Q. .....pf
i
93-0463-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0
93.0463.02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE 1 0 01 $0 $O
O'
SUB-TOTAL WATER ENOINILRING 0 2
93-0461-01 OVRRSIZZ WATER LINES $150 $150 $O $4 SOJ
i 93-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 118 0 SO 0 68
93.0461.03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS
93-0461-04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS 6. VALVES 30 O 0 SO Of
93-0461.05 RIPLACZ WATER LINZ STREET PROGRAM 200 0 S7 0 OI
93-0461.06 AZPLACE MISC. WATER LINZ$ 200 0 0{
93-0461-07 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 52 0 52 0 0.'
1S 0 15 0 0
93-0461-08 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 250 250
-J 93-0461-09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 182 182 0 0 01
93-0461.10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1NFILL ISO 0 01
92-0461-06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES 312 ISO 0 0
156
92-0461-09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 1,000 1,000 150 0 0
91.0461-08 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER S00 S00 0 0 0
. !
0
L SUI-TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 3,036 2,238 690 SO ..•-68 1
Page 23
I
i
I
k ~
' .eionVCAtCUT vRO.1ECT
~APITAI Itti~„
PLAN
"T = T99~-i f~~~AbV[HL
' Pr- WATER DEPARTMENT
10113 AM 1 1000)
BOND CURRENT AID•IN
PROJECT TOTAL FUND REVENUE .CONSTR. OtNLR~
1 NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION --I
`
FISCAL MR. 93
• I
17 93.0462.01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 1226 6 1 $O 0 126 $3 $0 $14
0 041 93-0462.02 WATER METERS S 0 5 0 0,
93-0462.03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
SOS-TOTAL HATER MLTLAINO 148 0 134 0 14~
TOTkI. 1993 CIP 3,871 2,670 Sd8 SO 12I I
f
it
i
I
page 24
I
I~ I
I
I~
h
I
_ CAPITAL IMPgO PHA PROJECT
f
1 1011) AM WATER DEPARTMENT
x 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHERI
tISCAL•YEAR 9)
I
93-0462-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $11 $O $3 $O $141
93.0462-02 WATER METERS 126 0 126 0 Ol
93-0462.03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 5 0 5 0 0
SUBTOTAL WATER METERING 149 0 134 0 14
TOTAL 1993 CIP 3,831 2,610 M 50 223
c
I
J
Page 24
I
I
I
I
CAPITAL IMPROVE;MU~uT PROJiCC l
20-Apr-50 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROYLMENT PLAN
10113 AN WATER DEPARTMENT
r 1000)
I PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER'
`
I
FISCAL YEAR 94
94-0450-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FUR $6 SO $6 $0 $0,
SUBTOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION ..6. .....0 ......6 0 -....0
94-0460.01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $16 SO $4 $0 $12, li
94.0460.02 OFFICE FURNITUR! 6 0 6 0 0
93-0460.05 OZONATION DISINFECTION SYSTEM 2,675 2,020 0 0 655 A
SU6-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 2,697 2,020 10 0 b671
94-0480.01 INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA SPECTRO $20 $20 $0 $0 $0
94-0410.02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SY 1 0 1 0 Oi
94.0480-03 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT 3 0 3 0 O
94-0460-04 WATERSBED MONITORING PROGRAM 6 0 6 0 0~
SUB-TOTA1. WATER LABORATORY 3...0. ....2..0 l0 .
01
94.0463.01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 Sd
94-0463-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 0 1 0
SUB-TOTAL WATER ENGINEERING 2 0 2 0 0
i
94-0461-01 OVERSIEL WATER LINES $150 $150 $0 $0 $0
94-0461-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 29 0 5 0 24
94-0461-03 WATER TAU* LOOPS 50 0 0 SO 0
94.0461.04 REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS 4 VALVES 61 0 61 0 0
94-0461-05 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET PROGRAM 200 0 200 0 0
94-0461-06 REPLACE MIS:. WATER LINES SO 0 SO 0 Q
94-0461-07 MISC. EQUIPMENT 15 0 15 0
94-0461-06 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 250 250 0 0
94-0461.09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 171 178 0 0 Q
94-0461.10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INFILL 150 0 ISO 0 bb
j 93-0461.06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES 293 0 293 0
J 93-0461-09 DISTRIbUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 750 750 0 0 b
_ ✓ 92-0461-09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 671 871 0 0 O 1
.....4
SUE-TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 3,047 2,199 774 50 24
94.0462.0! WATER METERS $133 $0 $133 $0 $6
94.0462-02 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 15 0 15 0 0
SUB-TOTAL WATER METERING 146 0 148 0
TOTAL 1994 C I P 5,930 4,239 950 SO 691
Page 25
^tl
i
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT J
20-Apr-90 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 10113 AM WAT U DEPARTMENT
..0 1000)
-
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
FISCAL YEAR 95 j
t
95-0450.01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMEWFUR $7 $O $7 $O .--.s0 i I
SUB-TOTAL WATER ADMINISTRATION 7 0 7 0 0'i
i
95.0460-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $16 $O $3 $O $13
95-0460-02 OFFICE FURNITVRE 6 0 6
O
'
SUB-TOTAL WATER PRODUCTION 22 0 9 0 13 M
95-0480.01 LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY/INFRARED SAL $16 $18 $O $O s0 i
95.0480.02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SY 2 0 2 0 0
95.0480-03 OEONt MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 4 0 4 0 0
95-0480.04 l VEHICLE (ADDITIONAL) 4 0 4 0 0
SUB-TOTAL WATER LABORATORY 28 16 10 0 0
95-0463.01 FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $O $1 $O $O
95.0463-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT l 0 1 0 0 1
SUBTOTAL WATER ENGINEERING 2 0 2 0 OI
95-0461.01 OVERSIEL WATER LINES $150 $O $150 $0 $0
95-0461.02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 62 0 13 0 49
95-0461.03 WATER TAPS, LOOPS SO 0 0 SO 01
95-0461-04 REPLACE 111E NYGRANTS A VALVES 64 0 64 0 VI
95-0461.05 REPLACE WATER LINE STREET PROGRAM 200 0 0 200 O
95-0461.06 REPLACE MISC. WATER LINES 53 0 53 0 Ol
95.0461.07 MISC. EQUIPMENT IS O 15 0 0
95.0461-06 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 250 250 0 0 0
95.0461.09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPCRADt WATER 94 94 0 0 0 i
9S-0461-10 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INTILL 150 0 ISO 0 ,
94-0461-06 REPLACE MISC. WATI'A LINES 263 0 283 0
94.0461.09 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE WATER 800 800 0 0.
93-0461-09 DISTRIBUTION SYSM UPGRADE WATER 586 586 0 0
.
SUBTOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 2,757 1,730 726 250 45~
9S-0462.01 MOBILt EQUIPMENT $16 $O $18 $0 Sd
95-0461-02 WATER METERS 140 0 140 0 d
9S-0462-03 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 1S 0 d
SUBTOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION 173 0 173 0
TOTAL 1995 CIP 2,989 1,748 929 250 6
i
jA,446-26 37-x,300 ~ I
Page 26
l
1 CAPITAL IMPFiOVEMEF(T PRO.IECr- I '
06126 PM 1991 - 1495 CAPITAL I!0!t0'VLMLNS PLAN
WASTLWATU DIPAAT11IIT
---......__.(1 : 10007
A PROJECT BOND CURRLNT AID-IN 1
i NUM/IA PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL POND ARVINUI CONSTR OTVU
FISCAL YLAR 91
91-04S1.01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE IQU1F/FURNiTU $3 $O $3 $O $0
91-0451.02 NAIL COMPUTU 07 00 07 $0 00
SUI-TOTAL WASTEWATU ADMINISTRATION 10 0 !0 0 0
A
91-0470.01 MOSILL EQUIPMENT 55 0 36 0 19
91-0470-02 LIFT STATION SLNOVATION 50 5o 0 0 0
91.0470.03 LIFT STATION SCADA (4 W 12 0 12 0 0
91.0470.04 LAND PURCHASE 6 DLVUCPNLNT SO 50 0 0 0
91-0470.05 INNOVATIVL 4 ALTUNATIVE TIMOLOO 30 30 0 0 0 +
91-:410-06 WASTIWATU TRIATMLNT PLAN: LYPANSI 760 760 0 0 0
SUS-TOTAL WASTRWATU nLATMINT 957 690 41 0 14
91.0461-01 LABORATORY CL314M NAINTINANCS 07 $0 07 00 40
91-0461.02 DIVISION INFORMATION MANACIIM BY 2 0 2 0 0
91-0461.03 ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROPHOTOMITL 66 46 0 0 0
91-0461-04 LABORATORY FIELD MONITORING IQUIIM 3 0 3 0 0
91-0441.OS PRSTRLATMLNT PROGRAM IQUIPMLNT (9) 13 0 13 0 0
91.0451-06 HAZARD MONITORING LQUIPMNT 21 0 21 0 0
9US-TOTAL WASTIWATU LABORATORY 112 66 46 0 0
91-0472-01 013 $13 $0 113 00 00
91.0472-02 PILLD EQUIPMENT 3 0 3 0 0'
91-0472-03 OFFICL IQUIPMLNT A rMITURi 1 0 1 6 0
SUS-TOTAL WASTRWATU LNGINIERING 11 0 17 4 0
91-%,71-01 OVERSILL SEWER LINTS 0200 $200 $0 $O 00
91-0471.02 MOBILB EQUIPMENT 112 0 75 0 37
91-0471.03 SLWU TAPS 36 0 0 36 0
91.0471-04 RULACE SLWU LINT ST292T PROGRAM 100 0 100 0 0
J 91.0471.05 INFILTRATION INFLOW COMMON 2SO 250 0 0 0
91.0471.06 REPLACI MISCELLANEOUS SIWU LINTS 36 0 36 0 0
91.0471.07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SIWU LINTS 250 250 0 0 0
91.0471.05 MISCELLANEOUS LQUIPMINT 29 0 29 0 0
91-0471-09 COLLLCTION SYSTIM UPGWI 3SWU LI 350 350 0 0 0
47.0471-10 SSCULITY FINCL IMPROVDam (S UVIC 16 0 16 0 0
91.0471-11 MOSILL DATA TIRMINALS 30 0 30 0 0
91-0471.12 WASTIWATU COLLICTION SYSTtM INFIL 150 0 ISO 0 0
SUN-TOTAL WASTIWATU COLLICTION I'm t'050 436 36 37
r
TOTAL 1991 CIP 2,6SS 21006 557 36 56
Page 27
i
}
06,26 PM
I
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL lMPROYR UT PLAN
vASrIUATn auARMST
1 0 : 1000)
1 +
}t
PROJRCT
MUNDU
PRODICT DRSCRIPTIOX
r TOTAL 10tH COUIN? AID-IX
" POND UVIMOI CON
P1SCAL YL1R 92 OT9a
92-0451-01 NISCILLogNS OPPICR WtPMRXT/FOX $4 $4 $0
10
` SDI,-TOTAL VASTINATU .•••'0
ADMINISTRATION ~ 0 .....q ......0. 0
91-0670-06 WASTIYATU UUTMINT p
92.0470•ryl MORILS ZWZPMXM? PLANT UPAMSI 6i1S 6,x17
92.0470-02 LIFT STATION AnOVATION 3S 0 0 0
92.0470-93 LIFT 3TATIO•I SCAU 12 SO 12 0 16
9200470-04 LAND PORC'.,ASI 6 DIVILOPMINT 12 0 0 0
92.0470-05 !.'!!iOYATIYI 4 ALTLRNATlYI TICIDIOL00 SO SO 10 0 00 J
4 .....10.... 30 p 0 .
D1-TOTAL VASTIVATIR TRIATMINT 6
9 1992 6 94S 3t ' 1l 0 16
92-0461-01 LASmATORT CAStWOIX MAINTINAMCI 1
92.0441-02
DIVISION INFORMATION MAMAGRMINT SY 17 30 17 10 !0 j j
92.0441-03 OAS CUOMATOCRAm/MASS SP4CTROPROT 9 1
92-0441.04 LA40RATORT SINX IM ROOD 63 64 3
92-0441-05 SPILL P 3 0 0 0
0 0 0
92-044!•06 fu~UVINTION/alSPOaAL FQOIPMIN 2 3 p
MUT PROGRAM tWIPMIMT 10 0 2 0
10 0
.
9O/-TOTAL NASTIYATU LUORATORT - _
1 1
4S 64 31 . O O
92.0472-01 OIS
92.0472-02 FIau 4QOIPMRXT i1 100 i; 10 10 J
92.0472-03 OFFICR WipkINT i FORXITDU 11 1
1 0 0 p
SUS-TOTAL 1 0 0
?11fA?IR IMOIX111IN0 11
0 l7 0 0
92-0471-01 OMSIZI MIR LINU j
92.0471-02 NwIL1 WIPNLMT 1200 1700 10 10
92.0471.03 SO= ?AP4 i37 0 SO 0 107
9
92-0471-05 2.0471.04 RULACI SM LINT STRUT PROGRAM 200 0 200 1p o 1
92-0472.06 RIPLACTMkISCE"ANIOUC~SAM LI RS 220 250
92.0471.07 MI4CIl.LA11[OOS 4QOIPMRX? ii 0 24 0 0
-0471.04 D 0
92 ~
92.0471.09 COLLROPI P STS N ISM LINOS
254 230 0 0 1S 0 0
92.0471-10 MASTIYATIR COLLACTIION Sys IL 10 S00 0 0 0
91-0471.06 R"LAC1 MISC a 0 150 0 O
91-0471-09 COLL4C?i0N STST OPO SIM LINTS 306 0 306 0 0 I
RAOR SIM LI 1440 10440 0 0 0 1
'
SO4•TOTAL VA4TIV,;TIR COLLMION 3,S14 2,640 749 1
1i 107 1' I
TOTAL 1992 CIP 10,622 9,649 632
!6 123
l Page 28
1
I
I
I
I
f
I
I CAPITl~L IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
06126 PM
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAIT
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
.....(S~s~l000)
k PROJECT SOND CURRENT AID-IN
MAN u PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FM REVENUE CONSTRUC 0711E1,
j
1 FISCAL YEAR 93
93-0451-01 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQ7IPNEM IM $S 10 $5 $0 10
SUE-TOTAL WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 5 0 S 0 0
i
93-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 141 10 123 10 125
93-0470-02 LIFT STATION RINOVATION 50 50 0 0 0
93-0470-03 LIFT STATION SCADA (4 LA) 12 0 12 0 0
93-0470-04 LAND PURCNASL 6 DEVELOPMENT 50 50 0 0 0
93-0470-05 INNOVATIVE 6 ALTERNATIVE TLCBNOLOO 30 30 0 0 0
93-0470-06 ADDITIONAL. PERSONAL COMPUTER 10 O 10 0 0
SUS-TOTAL VASTSWATU TRLTMENT 200 130 45 0 2S
93-0411.01 LABORATORT CASEWORK MAINTENANCE 13 10 13 10 $O
93.0441-02 REPLACEMEIIT LABORATORY EQOIPMEM7 22 19 3 0 0 1
93-0461.03 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGEMRNT SY 2 0 2 0 0
93-0461-04 PRETREATMEMT PROGRAM 14 0 14 0 0 +
93-0461-05 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING RMVATIOM 64 64 0 0 0
SUB-TOTAL VASTIWATER LABORATORY 105 63 22 0 0
i
93.0472-01 FIELD EQUIPMENT 112 10 112 10 $O
93.0472.02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 6 FWITVU 1 O 1 0 0
SUB-TOTAL WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 13 0 13 0 0
93.0471-Ot OV111121 SEWS! LIMES $200 1200 $0 $O 10
93-0471-02 MOBIL& EQUIPMENT 229 0 101 0 121
E 93-0471-03 SSM TAPS 11 O 0 11 0
93.0471.04 RRPLACS 59M LIME STURT PROGRAM 150 0 ISO 0 0
93-0471.05 INFILTRATION INFLOW COUICT10N 250 250 0 0 0
93-0471.06 REPLACE MISCELLANEOUS SEWER LINES 36 0 36 0 0
93-0471.07 DLVELOPM W PLAN 19VU LIMES 250 250 0 0 0
93-0471.04 MISCdd.ANIMS EQUIPMENT LS 0 15 0 0
93.0471.09 COLLECTION STSTLM UPORA01 SEWS LI 420 420 0 0 0
93.0471.10 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INFIL 150 0 1S0 0 0
92.0471-06 REPLACE MISCELLANEOUS 11WER LINES 247 0 247 0 0
92.0471.09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER LI LOGO 1,060 0 0 0 ;
91.0471-09 COLLECTION SYSTIM UPGRADE ism LI 190 190 0 0 0 ;
SUB-TOTAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION 31ISS 3,010 699 11 126
i
TOTAL 1993 CIP 4,171 3,223 764 11 153
Pepe 29
w
K
G
J
CAPITAL impgoVEMF PROJECT
xlff WASTINATER DtPAATMINT tLLN--,I
(1 : 1000)
N P
Human ROJECT am CURRIM AID-IN
...........r TOTAL MD REVINOt CONSTIUC OTXU
FISCAL YLi 94
~
r 94-0451.01 MISCILLANIOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FUR 06 00
` $6 00 301
i SUI-TOTAL VASTLWATER ADMINISTRATION 6 0 6 0•--• p
4
94-0470-01 MOTILE IQUIPMINT $52 $O $16 036 $0
I[ 94.0470-02 LIFT STATION AMVATION SO SO 0 0 0
94.0470.03 LIFT STATION SCADA 12 0 12 0
94-0470-04 LAND PURC8ASI 4 DLVUOPMENT p
SO SO p
94-0470.05 INMOVATIVI & ALTUNATIVt TICRNOLOG 30 30 0 0 0
94.0470-06 REACTIVATE !T. WORTS DRIVI LIFT ST 106 106 0 0 0
94-0470-07 RLICTIVATI IWY 310 LIFT STATION 10 80 0 0 0
94-0470.06 WTP EEPANSION - ULTIMATE SLVDGA D 440 440 0 0 0
` 91.0470-06 WASTIWATIR TRIATMINT FLANT UPANSI 10265 10,265 0 0 0
SUI•TOTAL VASTSVATIR TIEATIRNT 11,015 11,021 21 36 0
94-0481.01 INDOCTIVEI,Y COUPLtD PLASMA S?[GYRO $64 060 00 04 00
94.0481-02 LASORATOI.1 EQUIPMENT 1 0 0
94-0441-03 DIVISION INFORMATION MANAGIMENT Sy 2 0 2 0 0
94-0481.04 PRETRU-01ENT PROORiM 14
.....1 0 0
.............0 1
SUS-TOTAL VASTtWATU, LA80RATORY 64 6J 24 0 0
94-0472.01 IItu IQU2lMNT 03 00 03 00 SO
94-0472.02 OFFICI IQUIFMENT 6 rMIT4RE 1 0 1 0 0 1
i 94.0472-03 MOBILE IQOIFMOIT 18 0 A 0 10
SUHTOTAL WASTEWATRR INOINEUING 22 0 12 0 10
94-0471.01 0"11122 WAR LINKS 0200 $200 00 00 i0
94.0471-02 MOSILI WIpNW 17 0 3 0 14
94.0471.03 SIYRR TAM 18 0 0 18 0
94.0471-04 RVIACI 3IWIR LINT STRUT PROGRAM ISO 0 ISO 0 0
94-0471.05 INFILTLTION INFLOW CORRECTION ISO 250 0 0 0
94.0471.06 ■IFLACI NI3CLI4ANIOU3 39MIR LINES 36 0 36 0 0
94.0471.07 MIICtLLANtOUB EQUIPMENT 13 0 1S 0 0
94-0471-06 D8VILO►1RNT !LAN StW&A LINtI 250 ISO 0 0 0
94.0471-09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UFGRADI SVM LI 130 110 0 0 0
94.0471.10 WASTIVATIR COLLLCTIOI! SY3711M INFIL 150 0 150 0 0
` 93.0471-06 RIFLACI MISCILLANIMS 09M LINt3 335 0 33S 0 0
1 93.0471-09 COLLECTION SMIN VPOIADR 59VU LI 1300 11300 0 0 0
92.0471.09 COLLECTION SYSTN UMRAOI StVU. LI 900 900 0 0 0
i 3ol_TOTAL WASUVAT11 COLLECTION 3,601 3,OtO 619 ib 14
TOTAL 1994 CIF 14,998 14,161 759 54 24
rage 30
I
f
i
1 _MW
A P
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL INPROVL4NT PLAN
WAITLWATEI DEtARTMENT
0 a 1000)
p AA0.IECT
i NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION BOND C%JAILMT AID-IN
TOTAL FUND SAVINUR CONSTRUC OTju
FISCAL YEAR 95 I
i
` 9500431-01 NISCLLLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FUI 87 80 87 60 60
w
SUB-TOTAL WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION ---1- --••.0 --~7 --""".0" 0
95-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT
95-0410.02 LIFT STATION 11MOVATION 616 60 815 60 61
I 93.0470-03 LS►T STATION SCADA 12 G SO 0 0 0
95.0470-04 LAND PURCHASE & DEVELOPMENT 12 12 0 0
9500470.05 INNOVATIVE 6 ALTERNATIVE TECVOLOO 30 S0 0 0 0
4500470-06 WASTEWATER TRIATMINT PLANT EEFAMII 720 72
30 0 p 00 00
94-0470-08 WVU LEPANSION - ULTIMATE SLUDGE D 5630 5,630 0 0 0
I SUB-TOTAL WASTEWATER TRGTMLMT , •6,.480 7
6 501 27 0 1
95.0411.01 LIQUID CUOMATOGRA►IIY/INFRARED IPE ESS
95.0441.02 MICROV itg VIDEO SYSTEM 5 6550 6S 600 80
95-0481003 OZONE NON110AIN0 INSTRUMENTATION 12 p
93.0411.04 ADDITIONAL VENICLE (MOBILE EQuIPNL 12 0 12 0 0
0 12 0 .
SUL-TOTAL VAITEWATER LABORATORY 84 SS
]9 0 0 ,
95.0472.01 FIELD EQUIPMENT
95-0472-02 OFFICE EQUIPMENT S FURNITURE E1 $0 61 80 00
1 0 1 4 0
SU8-TOTAL WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 2 0""
2 p 0'
95.0471-01 OVIRS129 SEWER LINES 6200 1200
9S-0471.02 NOME EQUIPMENT 29 0 $0 $0
17
95.0471.43 SEWER TAPS 12 0 17 t
95-0471-04 REPLACI SEWER LINE $TRIET PROGRAM 100 0 100 10 0
95-0471.05 INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION 250 250
93.0471.06 RLPLACI NISCLLLANIOUI IEWQ LINES 27 0 27 0 C
95-0471.07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SLWEII LINES 230 250 0
9S-0471.0E MISCELLANEOUS 1QUIPMWT 0 0
is 0 is
95.0471.09 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM INFIX, ISO 0 150 0 0
94-0471.09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SLWtR LI 620 620 0 0 0
94.0471.06 REPLACE MISCELLANEOUS SEWER LIM93 330 0 330 0 0
93.0471.09 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE SEWER LI 1300 1,300 0 0 U
SUI-TOTAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION 3,290 2,620 634 19 -17
---.~_„+*~e 5495 GU _ 9_A41 9,ISS 99
x.__19 lA
GRAND TOTAL 1990 1995 CIP 42,344 36,194 3,631 145 374
Page 31
Ii
h
I
I
1,~
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAY
ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
X 1000)
YEAR 91 92 93 94 95 TOTAL
1. POWER PRODUCTION IMPROVEMENTS 560 310 200 950 2SO 2,260
2. POKER PRODUCTION ADDITIONS 0 0 0 0 16,000 16,000
3. POWER PRODUCTION MAIMT/REPLACEMENTS 0 315 210 0 0 525 N
4. OtTRHEAD EXTENSIONS AND IMPR.118.5 MI) 452 444 445 556 496 2,393 d
eo
5. UNDERGROUND EXTENSIONS i IMP.(6.0 MI) 617 716 857 945 959 41094 p
6. DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS 621 738 1,038 1,055 1,000 .4,452
7. METERS (3,121 CUSTOMERS) 90 106 130 182 144 652
8. LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (5,000 CUSTOMERS) 150 165 175 185 195 870
9. DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATIONS 297 101 208 270 610 1,486
10. STREET LIGHTING 287 291 227 211 480 1,496
11. MOBILE EQUIPMENT 220 342 200 166 227 1,155
12. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 163 170 203 275 215 956
13. LEWISVILLE/RAY ROBERTS HYDROELECTRIC 545 0 0 0 0 545
14. GAS PIPE LINE 0 0 1,000 0 0 1,000
15. RIGHT-OF-NAY/FACILITIES PURCHASES 550 55 60 65 75 805
16. OFFICE EQUIP, COMPUTERS, FURNITURE, RAPPING SYS. 139 242 153 169 180 883
17. BUILDINGS: CENTRAL DISPATCH, OFFICES, ETC. 8 11500 0 0 10 1,518
18. COMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL 246 120 47 100 40 553
19. POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENT 100 105 110 120 125 560
20. ECONOMIC CONDUCTOR REPLACEMENT 170 205 210 215 225 1,025
21. OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSION (3.8 MILES) 300 2,400 300 300 300 3,600
TOTALS 5,515 8,315 5,773 5,694 21,531 46,820
I
>rv4
Hued r~ I
ate..,,
1
r
i
I
1991 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
HATER UTILITIES
(1 x 1000)
YEARS 91 92 93 94 95 TOTAL ey
1 . NEW WATER PLANT/TRANSMISSION LINE 9,686 5,372 450 2,675 0 18,183 m
a
2. ELEVATED STORAGE 5 2,400 0 0 0 2,405
3 . LABORATORY IMPROVEMENTS 26 30 32 24 24 136
4 MAPPING SYSTEM - CAD/CIS 10 5 0 0 0 15
5 OVERSIZE WATER LINES 150 150 150 150 150 750 +
6 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 155 1150 1612 1799 1460 6,266
7 REPLACE WATER LINES 527 528 564 543 536 2,691
F 1 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INFILL 150 150 ISO ISO ISO 750
f 9 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 250 250 e.i 250 250 1,250
I 10 TAPS, FIRE HYDRANTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT 296 167 113 111 114 808
11 . MOBILE EQUIPMENT 138 150 170 45 100 603
12 . COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE 9 10 34 13 14 80
11 . SOOST92 STATION NEW PRESSURE PLANE 5,326 0 65 0 0 5,391
14 . MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 169 439 171 163 171 1,113
TOTALS 16,897 10,101 3,831 5,930 2,969 400448
I
it I
I
y r. i1 M
I ~ti>'nit~lli ~y R1,.W Jk~t,,,.n 3r•.c ...v.. .
1
I I
I
1
1 i
f,
I
II
I
1
II
I
4
f~Y'1 Rifr'T:l
yA C6xT.F 5,
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
WASTEWATER UTILITIES
(8 z 1000)
YEARS 91 92 93 94 95 TOTAL
eo
I LIFT STATION SCADA/RENOVAT100/REACT IFICATION 62 62 62 248 62 496 a
2 VASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 30 30 30 30 30 150
3 WASTEWATER TIIEATNENT PLANT EXPANSION 810 6,865 50 10,7S5 6400 24,880
.
4 LABORATORY IMPROVEMENTS 75 83 91 70 72 391
5 . MAPPING SYSTEM - CAD/CIS to 5 0 P 0 15
6 . OVERSIZE SEWER LINES 200 200 200 200 200 1,000
7 . COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 350 1,940 2,310 2,380 1,920 8,900
6 . COLLECTION SYSTEM INFILL 150 ISO 150 150 ISO 750
9 . REPLACE SEWER LIMES 136 534 433 521 451 2,611
10 . INFILTRATION/INFLOW 250 250 250 250 250 16250
11 . D"ILLOPIRNT PLAN SEWFft LINES 250 250 250 250 250 10250
12 . TAPS AND YIELD EQUIPMENT 109 41 44 35 20 149
13 . M0111.9 EQUIPMENT 167 192 211 81 57 780
i
f 14 . COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE 11 5 16 7 i 47
15 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 45 15 15 15 IS 105
TOTALS 2,655 10,621 4,178 14,998 9,891 42,344
h
1
I
I
r:v ►
1 t Ywt vr~
{ iryjj
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT INNEO
i
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
COMMUNITY SERVICES
F.. (S R 1000)
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
' 91-0030-01 Nav Personal Computer 4 0 4 0 0
91-0030-02 Replace Worn Carpet 3 0 1 0 0
i
E i TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1991 CIP 7 0 7 0 0
t 92-0030-01 Upgrade to 800 Megeherts 4 0 4 0 0
f 92-0030-02 CIS Terminal 4 0 4 0 0
r TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 8 0 8 0 0
93-0030-01 Misc. Office Equipment 2 0 2 0 0
93-0030-02 New Personal Computer 5 0 5 0 0
-
I
` TOTAL FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 7 0 7 0 0
94-0030-01 Misc. Office Equipment 3 0 3 0 0
-
ICI
fOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIA 3 0 3 0 0
4
95-0030-01 Misc. Office Equipment 4 0 4 0 0
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 4 0 4 0 0
TOTALS FOR CIP PERIOD 1991 - 1995 29 0 29 0 0
0
~ i I I
,I
J
j J
Page 35
I
4
r r
E 1
CAPITAL IMPflOVEMENT PROJECT _
1 1991 - 199S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
EQUIPMENT SERVICES
0 x 1000)
20-Apr-90
r
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
'
91-0580-01 Upgrade Fuel Tank System 3 0 3 0 0
91-0580-02 New IBM PSZ-30 Computer 5 0 5 0 0
91-0580-03 Replace IBM Typestriter 1 0 1 0 0
91-0580-04 Upgrade Office Furniture 2 0 2 0 0
SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES 11 0 11 0 0
91-0581-01 Replace wire welder -._...2 ...._.0 ._.__.2 ......0 ......0
4 SUBTOTAL MACHINE SHOP 2 0 2 0 0
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1991 CIP 13 0 13 0 0
92-0580.01 Mobile Equipment--Parts Truck 15 0 3 0 12
92-0580-02 Replace Tire Change Machine 6 0 6 0 0
92.0580-03 Upgrade to 800 Megahertz 10 0 10 0 0
92-0580-04 Miscellaneous Tools 2 0 2 0 0
SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES 33 0 21 0 12
r I
92-0581-01 Upgrade to 800 Megahertz -.....2 0 2 0 0
SUBTOTAL MACHINE SHOP 2 0 2 0 0
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 35 0 23 0 12
i
i
R 93.0560.01 Replace Tire Balance Machine 10 0 10 0 0
93.0580-02 Faiaaion Control Analyzer 3 0 3 0 0
93-0580-03 Replace Air Compressor 6 0 b 0 0
J 93-0580-04 Overfill Buckets on Fuel Tank 4 0 4 0 0 `
93-0580-05 miscellaneous Tools 3 0 3 0 0
SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES 26 0 26 0 0
93-0581-01 Miscellaneous Toole 2 0 2 0 0
SUBTOTAL MACHINE SHOP 2 0 2 0 0 `
I
J
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1993 CIP 28 0 26 0 0
Page 36
I
t
(YrIR •]:A9~
t sy`cE _
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
EQUIPMENT SERVICES
(S Y 1000)
i
` r ro .rr
I
94-0580-01 Mobile Equipment--Service Truck 16 0 16 0 0
r 94.0580-02 Miscellaneous Toole {
......3
SUB-TOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES 19 0 19 0 0
i
I I
94-0581-01 Replace Wire Welder 3 0 3 0 0
SUBTOTAL MACHINE SHOP 3 0 3 0 0
1 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 22 0 22 0 0
95-0580-01 Two Transmission Jacks 6 0 6 0 0
'I 95.0590-02 Miscellaneous Tools 3 0 3 0 0
SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES 9 0 9 0 0
95-0581-01 Mobile Equipment--Flat Bed 22 0 22 0 0
SUBTOTAL MACHINE SHOP 22 0 22 Il
I
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 31 0 31 0 0
I
I
TOTALS FOR CIP PERIOD 1991 - 1995 129 0 117 0 12
II
a
J ,
Page 37
7
I
HY
..r a
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SOLID WASTE
(3 Y 1000)
yr, 20-Apr-90
PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID-IN
NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER
91-0801-01 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 83 0 0 0 83
91-0801-02 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 83 0 0 0 83
91-0801-03 Mobile Equip--Replacement Car (R) 12 0 12 0 0
91-0801-04 Mobile Equip--M Too Pickup (R) 12 0 5 0 7
91-0801-05 Curbside Recycling Pilot Program 95 0 33 0 62
91-0801-06 Miscellaneous Office Equipment 1 0 1 0 0
91-0801-07 Reward for Adopt a Street 19 0 19 0 0
+ 91.0801-08 Mobile Equipment--Chipper (N) 410 7 0 34
SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL 346 0 77 0 269
91-0802.01 Mobile Equip--Front Load Truck (R) 117 0 0 0 117
91-0802-02 Equipment (rcontlood Dumpsters) 41 0 41 0 0
91-0802-03 Upgrade Equipment (Roll Off) 20 0 0 0 20
91-0802-04 Recycling Containers 18 0 l8 0 0 i
91-0802-05 Nov Dumpatsr Screening 20 0 20 0 0
91-0802-06 Nov TV Cameras 6 Monitors 6 0 6 0 0
SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL 222 0 85 0 137
91-0803-01 Mobile Equip--623 Scraper Rental 45 0 45 0 0
91-0003-02 Compactor Overhaul 15 0 l5 0 0
91-0803-03 Miscellaneous Tools 5 0 5 0 0
91-0803-04 New T-Rubber goal 1 0 l 0 0
I 91-0803-05 Tire Cutter _-,.15 0 0 0 15
SUBTOTAL DISPOSAL 01 0 66 0 15
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1991 CIP 649 0 228 0 421
I
i
92-0801-01 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 88 0 0 0 88 I
91-0801-02 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 80 0 0 0 88 {
92-0801-03 Mobile Equip--12 yd Rear Load (R) 58 0 0 0 58
92-0801-04 Upgrade to 800 Megahertz 20 0 20 0 0
SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL 254 0 20 0 234
I
i
Page 38
I
1
I
I
I
A'T'tl
ri5API1AL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT i _
1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SOLID WASTE
(S E 1000)
92.0802-01 Mobile Equip--Roll Off Truck (R) 94 0 0 0 94
E 92-0802-02 Equipment (Frontload Dumpsters) 43 0 43 0 0
92-0802-03 Equipment (Roll off) 32 0 0 0 32
92-0802-04 Dumpater Screening 25 0 25 0 0
92.0802-05 Upgrade to 800 Megahertz 22 0 22 0 0
;
J SUB-TOTAL COMMERCIAL 216 0 90 0 126
92-0803-01 Mobile Equipment--Water Truck (R) 9 0 9 0 0
92-0803-02 Mobile Eggipment --Compactor (N) ISO 0 0 0 180
92-0803-03 Flexible Membrane Liner 45 0 45 0 0
92-0803.04 Leachate Collection System 45 0 45 0 0
92-0803-05 Upgrade to 800 Megahertz 7 0 7 0 0
SUBTOTAL DISPOSAL 286 0 106 0 180
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1992 CIP 756 0 216 0 540 1
93-0601-01 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 92 0 0 0 92
93-0801-02 Mobile Equip--Claw Brush Truck (R) 55 0 0 0 55
93-0801-03 Mobile Equip--1/2 Ton Pickup (R) 15
0 7 0 8
SUB-TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 162 0 7 0 1551
91.0802-01 Mobile Equip--Roll Off Truck (R) 96 0 0 0 96 {
93.0801-02 Equipment (Roil Oft) 30 0 0 0 30
93.0802-03 Equipment (Frontload Dumpaters) l5 0 15 0 0
SUB-TOTAL COMMERCIAL 141 0 15 0 126
ii
93.0803-01 Mobile Equipment- -Pickup (R) 16 0 6 0 10 j
93.0803-02 Develop Now Landfill 6000 0 6000 0 0
SUB-TOTAL DISPOSAL 6016 0 6006 0 10
TOTALS FOR YEAR 1993 CIP 6319 0 6028 0 291
i
I
Page 39
i
F 1".'v 1, YM'S F4.
_ IJIIX?
rim CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
I 1991 - 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SOLID WASTE
x 1000)
1 94-0801-01 ibjbile Equip--Rear Load Truck (R) 97 0 0 0 97
94.0801-02
Mobile E ui --Flat B
r i 9 P ed Truck (R) 52 0 0 0 52
SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL 149 0 0 0 149
94-0802-01 Equipment (Frontload Dumpsters) 34 0 34 0 0
94-0802-02 Equipment (Roll Off) 14 0 0 0 14
SUB-TOTAL COMMERCIAL 48 0 34 0 14
94.0803-01 Building Maintenance 15 0 15 0 0
94-0803-02 Landscape for Landfill 15 0 15 0 0
SUB-TOTAL DISPOSAL 30 0 30 0 0
I
TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 227 0 64 0 163
95-0801.01 Mobile Equip--Rear Load Truck (A) 101 0 0 0 101
SUB-TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 101 0 0 0 101
E 95.0802-01 Mobile Equip--Front Load Truck (R) 130 0 0 0 130
95.0802-02 Equipment (Frontload Dumpsters) 50 0 50 0 0
SUB-TOTAL COMMEACIAL 180 0 50 0 130
V 95-0803-01 Misc Office Furniture 6 Equipment 2 0 2 0 0
SUS-TOTAL DISPOSAL 2 0 2 0 0
TOTALS FOR YEAR 1995 C1P 283 0 52 0 231
TOTALS FOR CIP PERIOD 1991 - 1995 8234 0 6588 0 1646
I
i
Page 40
t
fjlf
I
IHLLY\Wi~
I
t 1990-1995
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEASNT PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMAR,'
BACKGROUND 23 July 90
For the first time since Denton has been devel,)ping a multi-year CIP and
to an unprecedented degree, property values w:Il decline from previous
years. The impact of tha'. value decline may result in aubstantial revenue
decline which will impact operating and mainte,ance budgets and debt
service potential, which is funded by tax revenue. The drop in appraised
value coupled with only small sales tax revenue inct~-ases has led to a
more austere CIP than the CIP adopted last year.
Following policy guidance established during the 1986 Bond Election
process, the CIP should not require tax increases. Previous CIP's have
assumed from 41 to 81 revenue growth without the tax increases. That
assumption is no longer valid.
CIP APPROACHES
Accordingly, the General Government CIP follows these approaches:
1. Complete projects equal to the 1986 Bond Election before adding new
debt.
2. Limit sellinq new debt.
3. Delay construction of four buildings which not only carry with them
new debt services, but substantial O&M costs as follows:
a. NE Recreation Center
b. South Side Recreation Center
c. New library
d. Construction of a Law Enforcement/Court complex
4. Use sold bonds and bond savings to fund (1) health and safety CIP
items related to streets and drainage and (2) the Parks Board's
highest priority, athletic field development.
5, since revenue has become problematic and long-range forecasting of
revenue is also problematic, financial targets of future debt
_J issues are nut presented, and the Five-Year Schedule of CIP
projects for fiscal 1996 thru 2000 is withdrawn.
6, New bond elections followed by new debt issues required for funding
the proposed five year plan would be for streets and drainage, only.
Page 41
r
l;.r
~'~l,.ip 4iFfaY~{
1990-1995 I
General Government CIP
Executive Summary
Page 2
SUMMARIES
Following is a new debt comparison of the previously adopted CIP and this
year's CIP for General Government projects.
YEAR RECOMMENDED ADOPTED IN 1989
I I I
1990-91 1 $ 132,952 1 51,140,000 1
I
1991-92 1 $1,422,737 I $3,907,600 1
I 1
1992-93 1 $2,4970785 I $4,368,111 1
1 I I
1993-94 1 $2,0470000 1 $4,332,000 1
I I I
1994-95 1 $2,785,000 ! $30750,590 I
B. Total expenditures by year (excludes grants, match, and constructon by
others).
1990-91 $ 2,321,952
1991-92 2,000,337
1992-93 2,497,785
1993-94 2,047,000
1994-95 3,660,000
$12,527,074
,
C. Total expenditures by category by year (excludes g(ants, match, and
€ construction by others).
f
( Streets
1990-91 $ 1590000
1991-92 1,165,331
( 1992-93 1,243,785
1993-94 1,047,000
1994-95 11910,000
Total $50425,122
Drainage
I - j 1990-91 $ 530,000
1991-92 835,000
1992-93 1,354,000
1993-94 1,0000000
1994-95 1x750,000
Total $5,469,000
Page 42
r ,
I` 1990-1995
General Government CIP
Executive Summary
Page 3
Parks and Recreation
1990-91 $800,00
1991-92 0
1992-93 0
1993-94 0
1994-95 0
Total $8000000
i
Public Buildings
1990-91 $132,952
Public Safety
1990-91 $7000000
4 TOTAL $120527,047
i
(
i
1
i
i
~ I
i
v
l I
I
M}
2533k Page 43 ~
t
I
E
j
( I
I
i
`1""11 a.:nal.~y
1r 1LR• M■■■{
{ 7
' GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVINENT PLAN
1990.91
PROJECT FUNDING SOURCE July 11, 1990
!
SOLD IIIONDS OR CO'S I I I
I
r I I BONDS I NOT SOLD I OTHER I TOTAL I
{STREETS I I I I I
1 { I I I I I
Lillian Miller Sidewalk I I I I I
Engineering 1 $6,000 1 I I $6,000 I
I I I i I I
•I Oriole Street Reconatructlon I I I I 1
I erd sidewalks engieering I $14,000 I I I $14,000 1
1 i I I I I
+1 ft. Worth Drive Engineering, I I I I I
I right-of-way and landscape I 4 I I I
I design 1 $69,00081 I I $89,0001
► ! I I I I
+1 Nottingham extension engineering 1 $50,000 I I f $50,000 I '
1 ..............1 I 1•.............1
1 CATEGORY TOTAL 1 $159,000 I I 1 $159,060 1
I I I I I I
► I I I I I
(DRAINAGE I I I I I
' I I I I i
sewre/sumydal. 1 $350,0001 I ► s350,OD01
j I 1 I I I '
1 •1 Lose Del Ray Erglnesring I $60,000 I I I $60,000
M I I I I ! I ~
•1 Holtyhlll/lo Bridge Englrnering 1 $30,000 I I S $30,000 I
` I I I I I i
f •1 Ft. Worth Drive/Jams Street 1 1",000 I ► I $90,000
► 1 ..............1 I l..............1
CATEGORY TOTAL I 5530,000 I I I $530.000 I
I I I I I I
I I I I I i
I I I I 1
I PARKS
I I ! i I I
•I North Lek" Athletic I I I I I s
r f Field 9evelopaent 1 moo, Ow I 1 $500,00011 $1,300,000 I
► I I I I I
1 City Halt Roof ► 1 $132,95221 1 6132,952 I
I ..............1..............1..............1..............1
CATEGORY TOM I SE00,DOO I $132,952 1 $500,D00 I $1,432,952 I
• 1906 Bond Election Approved.
Sstate Grant
IlCOrs
1527,000 R.O.M. for stretch south of IN-15. $53,000 for IN-35 to ColtIns
engineering, $9,000 tandet" design
Psoo 44
-
i.vw 1~
~fM4N~
r GENERAL GOVERMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1990-91 111
PROJECT FUNDING SOURCE July 11, 1990 1
SOLD BONDS OR CO 'S I I J
I I BONDS I NOT SOLO I OTHER I TOTAL I
I } I I I I
I"LIC SAFETY
I I I I I I
I Construct Fire Station 06 i $500,000 i I 5500,DO0 I
I '
'I Low Enforc~t/Court I I I { I
{ Cowlex Design 5 ! $200,000 I I I 5200,000 I 1
} i ..............1 I I..............I
CATEGORY TOTAL I %?00,000 t I } sna,006 }
I I I I I '
I I I I I I
I I I 1 ! I
I L L............. I.............. L.............I 1
TOTAL 52,169,000 $132,952 $500,000 S2,S21,952 ,
TOTAL NEW CIF DEBT ISSUANCE 5132,95-
- 1
• 1966 Bond Election Approved.
6A spece study for all city offices. May begin in 69.90,
3
i
F
I
~ I
r
I
i
I
I I
111
` Page A3
Iff
1
l ~
I
I
I
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CAPITAL IMPRMNEKI PLAN
1991.92
,
•~r.s.. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCE July 11, 1990
..........................i.........
SOLD BONDS OR ro l l I I
EONDS I NOT SOLD I OTHER } TOTAL }
I I } I I I
ISTAEEIS I 1 I I }
I I I } I I
Extend Nottingham, signet I 1 I I 1
I and sidewalk I I 5470,400 I I :470,400 I
j Teasley ladecaping j j $107,337 j szo7,6113j $314,978 j
I I I I } 3
( oriole street Aeconstructlon } I I I :125,000 j
I and slde"tka I } $125,000 I I
I I I I } 1
} Loop 2BBI 11 380 to Colorado. i I I I I
Widen to 4 tar*$. Rlght•of•Wayl $12,600 } I 69,141,5% 1 $9,154,1% 1
I I I I I t
} Ft. Worth Dr. (U.S. 3771; 1.35 } I I E I
I to Collins . Phase I 1 E $450,000 I I $450,000 I
I I I..............
CATEGORY TOTAL I s12,600 I 51,151,737 I 59,349,237 } $10,514,574 1
} I I I I I i
I 1 } I I I i
I I I I I I
[DRAINAGE I 1 I 1 I
I I 1 I I 1
I loan Doi Noy I !565,000 $565,000
I 1 I
I I } I I
j Mollyl,ill/LongrTdge i I sz70,000 I 1 :270,000 }
I ..............I..............I I..............I
} CATEGORY TOTAL ( $565,000 I :270,000 I } :875,000 }
I I k I I I
1 I I I I I
1 I I I I I 1
..............I.............. ~..............I..............I
TOTAL 5577,600 51,422,737 $9,349,237 $11,549,574
i
TOTAL NEW CIP DEBT ISSUANCE $1,422,737
i
I
,
3SOMPT
All projects are 1966 fond Election approved.
,
Fase 46
I
I
I
I
I:
wV ti YiF;.fs%~
I
i GENERAL GMINMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
~ 1992.93
PROJECT FUNDING SMACE July 11, 1990
SOLD ISONDS OR CO'S I I I
VOMDS I NOT SOLD I OTNER I TOTAL ]
I I I I I I
r ]STREETS I I I I I I
I I I ] I I
1.111Ian Miller Sidewalk I I "lijas I I $0,765 1
I I I I I I
I villowood Ilkwey7 I I I I I
I Sidewalks I ] $100,000 ] ] $100,000
I I 1 I I I
I Fe. Worth Dr. (U.S. 3771r 1•35
! ! I I l
I to Collins • Phaes 11 ( I SsDO,DOO I I $500,000 I
i
I Intersection Control Signets I S22s,000 I I $225,000 I
,F I i I I I I
l I Turn lams for Arterlale I I I",000 I I $90,000 I
I I I I I I
Lardecape Loco 233 I I I i I
i I IN35 to kKimmy I I $1so,Deo { $150,000 I $300,000 I
! I I i I I
] Pedestrian Signals I I $30,000 { ( $30,000 I
I I I ..............I I..............I
I CATEGORY TOTAL I I $1,143,735 I I 111,ty us I
I I I I 1 I
IORAINAGE I I I I I
I I I I 1 I
Pecan Creek Downtown I I I I I
Master Plan I i $51,000 I I $51,000 I
I I I I I I
Cooper Crook Charnel, Phase 1 I ] $750,000 I I $750,000 I
1 i Pecan Crook, Iradehw to I I I I I
Iuddell ] I $250,000 ] I $250,DC0 I
I I I I I I
Kingfisher I I $7$,000] ] $73,000]
I I I I I I
a 1936 lord Election Approved.
ILpatly, election not rWr•d by 1966 Sond covenants,
1~,Eiectlon required.
Pape N
1
i.
~w'r• wr~'wr~
l v r r1+s.;si Nor:
wV fe■■¢
h
GENERAL GOVEANIIENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1992.93
i
l . +rv'..f W
I O PROJECT FUNDING SOURCE July 11, 1990
SOLD 1$oaos ON CO'S I I I
SONDE I NOT SOLD I OTNER I TOTAL 1
1 I I I I 1 J
j IDRAINAGE (Continued) l I I I i I
I I i I i i
Avenue G I I f1DO,0D0 I I $100,000 I
~ I I I I I I
Wilson, Morse, A!eRender I I I I I
Are. I I $120,0001 I $120,0001
I I I ..............I I..............I
I CATEGORY iD1AL I 1 $1,354,000 1 so 1 s1,3 4,000 1
I I I ..............1..............1..............1
TOTAL 52,497,705 f0 52,647,785
~I TOTAL NEW CIO DE$T ISSUANCE f2, 497, 705
I i
Electlon required.
i
i
r t
1 ~
Page 48
i
i
r
~ I
li
I
~YY1R• rac,cv
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1993.9<
PROJECT FUNDING SOURCE
July 11, 1990
SOLD ISONOS OR CG'S I I
BONDS NOT SOLD I I OTHER i0tal
I I
IStREETS1 i I I I I
I I I
Artarfol Turn Lanes I I I I
I S1DO,000 I I 5100,000 I
I Street Constriction/ I I I I I
I Aecaatruction I I I I
I I I s50D,000 I I $500,000 j
SldeNSiks/$fkewye I I I I +
5100,000 I I $100,000 I
I COW Street Pavlrp I I I I I
+ I snz,ooo I I $112,000 I
I Vonato I I I
$235,000
I I I 1235,000 I
I CATEGORY TOTAL j + $1,0117,000 I I I
I I I 51,0117,000 I
I I I
lcutma! I I I I I
I I I I
I Cooper Creek Drafra/e . I I j
I Phaae I1 I I I
I I $500,000 I I $500,000 I
I Pavan Creek Dral I I I ( I
nape nav I I
I Robertson I I I
I I 8500,000I I
I $500,.00
..............I I
CATEGORY TOTAL j I :1,000,000 I
I
I + I $1,DOO,00
ooo ~
I
I I I I
I TOTAL ( L.............I..............~..............I
so 5:,0117,000 s0 $2,0117,000
r TOTAL CIP DEOT ISSUANC!
~ f2,0<7,000
hogatty, etectfaf not required by 19116 Acrd Covenants.
` =ltectlon required.
I
Papa 119
I
f
I
I
E
h
I~
I
~~w• wwx+.,~
PY II:iAP J
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLA
1994.95
. v .(U
-..,PROJECT FUND114 SOURCE .-..'.July 11, 1990
$0.0 IBOND'i OR CO'S I I I
BONDI I NOT SO1D I OTHER 1 TOTAL 1
I I I I I I
IITREET$ I I I I I
I I I I I I
University Drive, IN-35 to I I I I I
1 377, Widen to 6 lens. • I I I I I
I.O.W., sipnsle, 8 Iantscsplrq ( (875,000 I $300,00021 $44,203,37611 645,378,376 1
I I I I I I
1 Arteriat Turn Lomas I 1 $100,000 1 I s1DO,000 I
I I I I I I
Landscape Wimey 0 Loop 256 ( I $150,00011 :150,000 1 9300,001 1
I I I 1 1 I
1 street Construction/ ( I I I
i Recomtructlon I I 6250,000 1 1 $250,000 1
I I I I I 1
1 WestNey Paving I I $235,000 1 I 1235,000 1
1 1 ..............1..............1..............1..............1
1 CATEGORY TOTAL I 6875,000 I $1,035,000 1 $44,353,376 I $46,263,376 1
i I I i I I
1 I I I I I
IDRAENAGE I I I I I
Pecan CrNki Kertey to Woodrow, I I i 1 1
I Phase 1 1 1 $1,000,000 1 I $1,000,000 1
I I I I I I
Pecan Crook atonB University I 1 :250,000 i 1 $250,000 1
I I I i I I
Comdr Creek, Phase [It 1 1 1500,000 I 1 1500,000 1
I I 1 ..............1 1..............1
CATEGORY TOTAL 1 I $1,750,000 1 1 s1,RO,000 I
I I i
I I I ..............1..............1..............1
TOTAL $875,000 $2,755,000 $44,353,376 145,013,376
TOTAL CIP 0181 111UAMCE $2,785,000
f e 1986 IoM Approvat.
✓ 130NPT
/Election not recIulred.
Ps" 50
{
I
I'
1
i
i J
I I
4 ~N V 9 IOf:T+t'
i('^t ~w Wfxf r'
MINUTES
Planning and Zoning Commission R A F T
` July 18, 1990 A
special called meeting of the Planning, and Zoning Commission of
the City of Denton, Texas, was held at 5:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
r Present: Euline Brock, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, Etha
Kiker, and Fran Morgan
' Absent; Judd Holt and William Kamman
Present from Staff: Frank Robbbins, Executive Director for
Planning and Development; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Steve
Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation; and Olivia
Carson, Clerk-Typist
Chairperson Brock called the meeting to order.
Hold a public hearing and consider the 1990-1995 Capital
` Improvement Plan (CIP).
:hair opened the public hearing. There was no one present to
speak -o the issue. Chair closed the public hearing.
11r. Glasscock stated that the Commission has gone through the plan
' pretty thoroughly. Ile has nothing special to add to the plan.
' 14s. Kiker stated that since the Commission has spent time going
over the issues, she moves to recommend approval of the CIP as
written. Seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unaniuously carried
(4-0).
Ms. Morgan arrived at the meeting.
Meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m.
2338x
~I
1 wV M ns [,a. vp
r ~ i■■■■
I Fe3
i MINUTES
Planning and 2°nlnp Commission
July I1, 1990
i
Zoning
regular meeting of the planning and Commission of the
city of Denton, Teass, was held on July 11, 1990 at 5:00 p.m• in
. the Council Chambers of the 11un1clpal Building. Etha
t: Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, William Kamman,
and Fran Tlorgan
Presen Kiker,
Absent Euline Brock and Judd Bolt
Robbins. Director Bob
Executive Durban
Present from Staff: F raevelopment; Owen Yost,
and
Planning
11 Delson orlofn cry,
Executive Director for Utilities'
Electrical EnglneocSng; Javid Ilam , Director of
Water/Wastewater Utilities; StAdministratLve Analys`;
Park Services; Cecile CarsoAttorney; Jerry Clark,
Morris, Assistant City Ilowird Martin,
Jod Harrell, City Manager;
Enegin e r oMorris, err ; Lloy
W Sivia
Water Lab: Lee Allison, Water/Wastewater; and O
Carson, Clerk typist
Mr, Kamm an was appointed temporary chair by acclamation and called
the meeting to order.
Ms, Kiker arrived at the meeting, lication by
1. Hold a public hearing and consider byeYecn°n Coe and Ben
Mayhlll Joint Venture rete Use Permit (SUP) otr&rxveyAtractlon
Plnnell, for a SP alicfie, stone clay
and storage of sand, c
ment `'ant
S TAFF REPORT: Mr .1Y5 os atcrreportlocate ed dhsouth eofiTreat
approximately 29. 6
Roa4, north of Foster Road and esslani landhtfiereoare
adjacent to thhomesaggsn theaareat pThe site is coned for
stn Le in uily
light industrial use and a specific use permit is reqai
g
to operate the existing business. Discussions with the
representatives of mayhill joint Venture culminated In the
ubilc hearing was
application for a specific Atetherapplicant's request, this
I set for October 2S, eared in the
i hearing was cancelled, and notification lie beat n would be
` newspaper, with It statement thatnotactedto reschedule the
rescheduled. The applicant
hearing; therefore, staff is bringing this matter to the has Commission for resolution. Dallas, stated
Coe, 1259 La Salina, urchased the
PETITIONER! Courtney informing them
lthaat nd, he Is they tecetvedoa letter ErumathcwCltYtheYCeparatt for
that no permit is necessary to level land in p application was made
future development. Nine months ago,
for a specific use permit, Through miscommunication,
staff. Mr. Coe asked t a
Snforaatton was not submitted to 22 1990' so
st on ed until August ,
the public hearing be po p et trier inEotmationft1hehPublic
that theyy wilt have ti me to g
! staff. Shey did not know about the schedulSng
hearing until two days W.
✓ I
IN FAVOR: none present.
OPPOSED: none present.
i
RECOMMENDATION: Mr. Yost stated that because staff has no
to
tecelved mare detailed Information, they a n ot taking a
posltlon on the natter at this Point his Point Operating the
Mr, Kamm an said that they are w-ration currently
fiuslness illegally. Ileoeekeun if the cequeslsddo~e~ontinue
if the hearing is posep
J
~ la Hw
aa+rca~
1ry~
7
M Minutes
July 11, 1990
page 2
Mr. Robbins stated that the applicant has indicated that
they have stopped operation.
Mr. Engelbrecht said that denying the case at the present
meeting would have not impact the petitioner since the,
operation has ceased.
Mr. Yost said that it would not effect the way the property
looks but would entail another fee for a new submittal.
Mr, Engelbrecht asked if there has been any communication
with the petitioner since the original hearing was postponed.
Mr. Robbins said that there were some informal discussions
1:, the late spring.
Mr. Coe explained that the reason they stopped operation is
that their contractor disappeared. They want to get a new
contractor and finish the job. Their intent is to level the
site so it will be developable. They do not intend to do
more work on the site until this matter is resolved. They
` are moving material and doing backfill, There are two holes
on the site to eliminate run-off. They intend to develop
mini warehouses but have no plans to build in the Immediate
future, If the case is postponed, they will notsio any,
further mining at the site until an SUP is approve.
DECISION: Mr. Glasscock moved to continue the public
hearing on August 22 1990, Seconded by Fran Morgan and
unanimously carried t5-0).
ll, Consider the final plat of Western Hills Park; Lot 1, Block
A.
Mr. Yost reported that the 6,887 acre tract is located
lmmediatel;+ vest of Interstate IS. and partially abutting
the city limits line. Frontage is along the southbound
Interstate IS access road. On May 23, 1990, the Public
Utilities Board (PUB) recommended approval of economic
development funds, contingent on Camping World locating at
the site. Costs in excess of the approved $92,000 will be
the responsibility of the developer. the pproperty is coned
tight industrial and development of a Camping World store to
serve the recreational vehicle aftermorket Is anticipated.
It was moved b+ Mr. Glasscock, seconded by Ms. Xiker, and
unanimously carried (.-0) to approve the final plat of
Western Hills Business Park1 Lot 1, Block A.
III. Work Session to discuss the 1990-1995 Capital Improvement
Plan.
Mr. Nelson explained that the PUB is charged with putting
together the Cl;. ility C1P that works witR the general
overnment PHe set forth the aajor elements of
letermining the needs for the utility CIP and presented
Rraphs to the Commission. He r.vlowed specific
recommendations, major pprojects, costs totals, information
about bonds, and probeble rate changes as well. There is a
possible need for m new generator at the power plant. They
are looking at the cost. They could put in a gas turbine to
heat water and make steam. The steam creates power and tl.sy
could have machines running all the time. It would be sore
efficient. there are plans to take down the utility poles
along University Drive in conjunction with its widening.
Another elevated water storage tank is needed.
I
I
Yr
Pot Ainutqs
July III 199u
1 Page s
1 3333 More landfill will De needed In 1993, It the current
` landfill is limited to residential use only, it will extend
its life to about 10 years. fnere is still dept and
operating cost for the landfill. Options for commercial
solid waste will have to De examined. A task force will
have to look at drainage utilities. there are now EPA
1 r. regu uttons requlriug testing of storm water, and possibly
F detention and treatment.
As. siKer asked about the underground conversion along
University.
Ar, Nielson replied teat the concept is tnat when the Mgnway
uepartment widens the street, the City will move trio power
poles either behind ousiaesses or will install the 11nes
underground, it will be in the 1991 budget depending on the
aighway department.
k Ms. Morgan asked about the life span of large City vehicles.
,fir. Belson answered that the policy is .even years or 70,UUO
miles with the exception of the very big trucks. They can
get more years on them. Moolle equipment is Included in
their price. fhe bucket part of some trucks may last 15
years while the truck itself may not last that long and have
to be replaced. 0n question, no said that major projects
cannot De rescheduled easily. Others are cedar to slide
oack a year if anticipated growtn levels are not reached,
Ar. Robbins stated that the major issues of the CIP were
discussed at the last meeting. Tue Commission wanted core
Information about development of recreation facilities.
Staff is recommeadiag segregation of Donds for library and
recreation center development. me feasley landscaping
project nos been moved back another year, One change is the
construction of nottln ham, Staff felt that the projects
approved In the bond a ection should De built before
beginning on others.
Mr nngelorecut asked if critical maintenance for streets is
being covered.
4r. Clark replied that there is a standard operating budget
for patching and one for construction, they will be able to
Keep up and there are no major problems, The CIP assumes a
poor revenue Increase so iE more revenue is received, more
projects can be added. iney would like to be able to do
major repaving with new equipment in the future.
IV. Director's Report
Mr. Robbins reported that staff is putting together a
f ack■ a for the sign fee ordinance. It has to do with fee
or 0 f-premise signs that the City will De certified to
issue. fhe Government Affairs Committee has been looking at
the sign ordinance, they may De visiting witn the
tleautiflcatfon Commission and Planning and Zoning very
soon, Tito Boards and Commission's banquet is on July 26,
1990. de has talked with people about the plat process
rewrite. fhey way be meeting in the evenings.
Meeting adjourned at 0;35 p,m.
23212
al
1M wti.v} y
MINUTES qj
Planning and Leming Commission iP$e
June 11, 199U
The regular meeting of the Alanning and toning Commission of ins
eld on June 71, 1990 ■t S100 p.m. In
City of Denton. Texas, was h
the Council Chsmbars of the Municipal Building.
lassc DCk I Judd Holt, William
Pre•entt tnqelbcecht,
nd echt, fIvan ish Morgan
...r,
P Absent: cullne Brack and Etha Kikes
present from ScanLr Frank Executive
anl Planneteo
planning Jerry
Planning and toningi Gwen lost, Utb
Clark, City Cn91nu rr Joe Mb[ Clerk-typlstnt City
Attogn,yr and Olivia Careen,
Vice-chairman Holt called the meeting to order.
1, consider the minutes o, the regular meeting of June 11, 1990.
It was moved by Mg. Ramman, seconshe Mmin Glasscock, and
unanLmously carried 54-01 to approve
regular meeting of June 13, 1990.
Il, Resolution of Commendit lon 109 tlitabeth Evans.
Ltam vas postponed. A
Ill. Conslddr the variance of Article 1lIr 1.01, Section N.7 and '
Article 1.15, 5ectlone A and a.5 of the 1961 Subdivision
Regu lotions Log Green Valley Ranch Estates.
i
Item was withdrawn.
IV, Work session
A. Discuss the 1990-1995 Capital Improvement Plan (C1P).
Mt. Robbins stated that the CIP 1e substantially more 1
austere than last years as s Cdneaquof lower in
revenue from property tae. Ptopetty values Denton County and the proposed CI; is what staff thinks
the city can afford to do.
Mr, Bngelbrecht artived at the meeting.
Mg. Robbins said that stiff is trying to !allow the
dlfection from 1965 to have Ctpl that do not fall,
tares. The CIP is Lherefore based on ineteased
revenue. A tax increase was not pact of the 1966 bond
issue of the voter guide. Mr. Robbins explained how the
CIp is funded and how bonds Age sold and used. bonds
'
have been sold to fund A flew recreation dente,, but
becsuea the City cannot afford to operate the hlilding,
staff is suggesting that the bond money be used for
f sttests. When bonds are sold for streets, that money f
can be used to replace the bond money for the recreation
crater.
Mr. Mamie cautioned that he was unsure bond money could
be used tar something other than what the bond was
Peculiar that the money
approved lot. He said it Atoms
could be used for something etas. It the past, funds '
could not be trinsforrsd from project One another, coild only be used for esaotly what it Vas approved for. '
Mr. Robbins stated that John McOCans Of the finance
Department and the City's bond counselor have been
consulted, it is legal to transfer funds. The bonds
that were sold can be used for any project that was
approved in 1966.
'a try:}
N
Par Minutes
vtw..:w June 17, 1990
Page 1
Mr. Holt said that when the City gets people interested
and involved In what they are trying to do and then
decides not to do that, it bothers him.
Mr. Ingelbrecht said that the project is only being
delayed. It was not approved for a specific year.
Mr. Holt atotal that It is be Ing suggested that bond
money collected for the recreation center be spent on
at nat I.
Mr. Robbira said that the City will then sell bonds foe
streets and use it on the recteat ion center. Last year
1 then was a five year CIP plan and then in additional
five year schedule. This year staff is not proposing
the additional five year schedule because they ' of
know what the financial targets will be. Staff ...s
a imply lioted projects that have already been approved.
mo. Morgan asked it the City will have to make a
statement to ci utens.
Mr. Robbins said that ocigina,ly the City thought it
would have the same financial targets as last year.
Then it received financial data that indicated revenue
may not be as much as had been expected. The City is
not legally required to make a I,ublic pronounceuent
about this. The City Manager has been visiting with the
City Council concerning this istue. When the City's
budget wan put together, effort :as made to maintain the
existing level of service withcut tax increase.
Mr. Clark stated that the rsaeon streets and drainage
wore put on the plan ahead of the recteation center is
because the projects ate basically on sthtduls. The
thinking was not to ponaliti those areas becausa of
problems with other projects.
At. Robbins presented maps showing whore the major GIP
projects would be taking place.
Mr. Ingelbtocht asked f the bonds that have not bean
sold need to be approved.
Mr. Robbins said that some of them do not tequila voter
approval.
Ms. Morgan clatifted that bonds wait sold for what was
approved by voters but not specifically for the ,
recreation center. It could be bull) with a tax
increase.
Mr. Robbins said that the other option is to decrease
existing services. Staff is suggest'nj delaying the
rat nation center because of the other expenses Involved
with it.
Mr. Holt said that he does not want the City to have to
gringo during in audit. There ■ee not enough basketball
and park facilities. Struts may need to to cut to fund
` the recreation canter.
J Mr, Glasscock said that attests are what everybody
complains about but they its getting better. '
Ms. Morgan said that work is taking place on attests all
over town. It is very visible but so are athletic
fields. She has hued a lot of complaints about the
lack of facilities.
<I
Pi: Minutes
a dune 37, 1990,,:
Page 1
Mr. Kamman said that sports involve organized groups.
There acs not organized g 'upa lobbying for each street
f to be repaired but it is something that people want
done. The City needs to continue street and drainage
improvements. organized sports should not be mots
dominant than other projects.
I
M . sg Mr. Kngelbrecht asked what the coat of operation a
maintenance of an athletic field is versus a recreation
cantle.
Mr. Robbins said that it is a lot less.
I
Mr. tnge/bceCbt said that he would like to know the cost
of operation and maintenance for the two field at Dania '
Pack. He also asked for information about the Or Lola
Street project.
I
M[. Clark replied that It is associated with the Loma
Del Say drainage project. That area is a moss. The
slope of the outfall is one foot in 1600 feet. The
drainage will have to cross two State roads ■nd a bridge 1
most be built. The possibility of going down
mockingbirds and dumping the water in Pecan Creek is
being Investigated.
1 S. Diicuu the platting process re-write. a
Mr. Robbins stated that another committee to needed. 4 ;
Staff could put together developers or interest groups
and developers, but doss not want to have a bias. They 1
would like one of the Commissioners to chair the
committee. No conclusions have been reached on absolute
language which a committee needs to sort through. Jtaff
IV recommends that the Commission appoint the committee.
` Mc. engelbracht asked what other committees ate working I
IE with the development community. That* may be too much 1
going on at once.
Mr. Robbins said the system could get overloaded. Theft
is the toning Task forco, the Sign Committee, the
landscape interest has no teal committee yet, and a
transportation planning committee will be appointed.
` Some Issues have been discussed with the Beautification
Committee. The 101 front yard landscaping cequlremsnt
is harmful to people with big setbacks, It may be
requiring too many trees. Landseeping is a low priority
right now but there may be developers forming a group
and pushing the issue.
Mt. Mortis said that there wets developers on the
landscape committee. It seems like the City keeps
looking at ordinances over and over.
I
, M[. fngelb[ec ht said that the front yard nq.f remsnt may
encoucage a minimal setback. 1s a larger or smaller
setback desirable? Parking in the back might be good. ,
It to an interesting question but all the committees may
be putting too much pressure on the City.
` J Mr. Robbins gave a list of posjibl* developers and
engineers that could serve on the plat process
committee. he said that he has not checked with any of
them except bill Coleman to sea It they ace interested.
1
C. Discuss the Zoning Task force membership.
I The Commission provided Mr. Aotbins with sugg11tlon9 got
membership of the Zoning Task force.
j
I
II
f ~
I
I
I I
I
P i t .Y in lit es waa,,n•
1990
June 27,
Page e
V. Director's Report.
Me, Robbins said that he is vatting for input from the
Covernme nt Affairs Committee on the sign ordinance. when
they make a recommendation h+ Will take it to the
Beautlflcation Commission and khan to the Planning and
lcning Commission. Staff has done an analysis of how Ruch
A it costs to p0 emit signs. That will also be brought to the
F Commission. Transportation planning is dependent on
forecasting.
model appointment
and s number crunching.. They consultant ldoing s a
Robert M. Ban owns 900 acres at IR 136 and Hwy. 380. Be
wants to get it in an enterprise some. That would require
plan
acresAofnmoderateTintensity• lAWdetailedtstudy aces, wi1160
have to be defined since this is outside of the study Seas,
of the Denton Development Plan. This subject will be
brought to the Commission tot a study session- Staff is
also ready to come back to the Commission with the gteenbelt.
Mr. Holt said that he is interested in the greenbelt but it
is hard to think about when they have just been dlscu ring
not being able to do things for years.
Me. Robbins replied that the 9ceenbelt plan is a
consolidation of existing policies and a strategic plan to
act on them. One thing that needs to be done is to put the
greanbelt on the concept map. Some people recently wanted
to dedicate floodplain land and there 1s no adopted policy
in place as to whether the City should accept it or not.
She greenbelt could tie together with pedestrian and bike
ways. They arc usually in greenbelts. The City may not be
able to spend money on the greenbelt the public would be
aware that you were trying to do something. They MAY rant
to donate or do something to alleviate the costs. The
on-premise consumption issue for downtown is still being
discussed. The coning ordinance will probably be amended in
Auquet. A church has moved into the old theater on the
square. Some shopowners are upset because they Will not be
able to get beer and wine permits vithin three hundred feet
of a church. The concern is focusing around the Square.
Staff has visited with the churches in the central Business
District. They indicated that exempting the Square would be
okay but not the whole Central Business District.
Mr. Holt asked about the Campus Theater.
He. Robbins said hat staff Will look at St.
Meeting adjourned.
130 Ya
i I
~N KO M1M1'tibw~
JCISS!3
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES 80ARD MINUTES
April 24, 1990
14. MAKE FINAL RECOWNDATION ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT FIVE YEAR 199}11-1199955
THE CITY COURUL-.
Nelso.i reviewed costs, revenues, rates, future requirements, and
other items of the proposed CIP.
Motion
Chew made d recommendation to the City Council and the Planning and
Zoning Commission to incorporate this CIP in with the City's annual
CIP. Second by Frady.
Vote
All ayes, no nays, motion carried,
i
f
ff
f
l
6819U:10
{ J
I
EXCERPT
` PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
April 10, 1990
6. WORK SESSION ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT PROPOSED 1991-1995 CIP.
Nelson reviewed the Utility Department CIP's.
r Electric will have a small increase in 1955 due to $To million
repowering of the Power Plant. Water will have a 15% increase in
1551-92 due to the Lake Ray Roberts Reservoir. In 199u, bonos will
need to be sold for the lake Ray Roberts Water Treatment Plant. In
1992, $8.5 mii!-'on bonds will need to be sold for the Water Treatment
Plant. The Upper Trinity Regional Water District is to pay 49% of
the costs. The rate increase reflects their participation. Laney
asked Nelson his feeling about the UTRWD. Nelson preferred to hold
the rate increase to 12%, and to do this, some projects may need to
be cut. The possible cuts would be miscellaneous water lines ($48
million), water distribution system infill 1$150 million), and
development plan water lines ($250 million). Thompson felt it not
t wise to cut the enterprise lines. Nelson said the oversi-iag of
water lines could possibly be cut, but only if developme M did not
occur in 1991. Nelson explained there was another area ;n which
water could cut back; and that is if the $333.000 repayment to the
Electric Uepartment could be delayed for 1991-92.
Thompson asked if this would adversely affect Electric Utilities.
Tullos said no. It was the consensus of the board to hold off two
years on repayment to the Electric Department instead of cutting
projects from the CIP, lhompson wanted it understood that the debt
was only delayed, not rescinded.
Wastewater Utilities would experience a lower rate increase than
originally projected with the extension of construction of the
Wastewater Treatment Plant from two to four years. In 1991, a 9,00
increase would be necessary; in 1992-93, a 12% increase fr. both years.
Solid Waste
Bill Angelo discussed the debt retirement of the Solid Waste Division
and apprised the aoard that a change in structure of the landfill to
f a residential facility would not only save our landfill by lu years,
but would also eliminate the need for a $6 million landfill
investment.
Chew asked about increased fleet expense. Angelo said that transfer
routes would cost more money and direct routes would require
additional truck purchases to handle trunaround time.
Nelson informed the Board that Solid Waste's major CIP expense was in
Mobile Equipment for the purchase of a truck/trailer rig ($95,000)
for curbside disposal. An alternate proposal would be the expansion
of the drop box program for paper and glass recycling.
I
i
I
t. v ♦ rs,a w
Excerppt Minutes
Pagu 2
Thompson asked if we could use the railroads instead of our
vehicles. Angelo said the railroads do not go relatively close
enough to the landfill centers.
Equipment Services
Strictly operational expenses.
Drainage Services
Street sweeper needs to be replaced. In 1994, General Government
will assist with monies needed, but after the initial year, Utilities
should have a Drainage Utility established.
Nelson explained we would get a consultant to come to the PUB/P&Z/CC
regarding the Drainage Utility. the major problem facing the
Drainage Utility is that the Environmental Protection Agency will be
requiring the monitoring of the runoff.
Mr. Laney asked about the upgrading of the fuel t nk. TWC requires
renovation of underground storage fuel tanks when they are so old.
6819U:8-9
i
I
E
: .
( v MINUiES
Planning and Zoning Commission
i March 28, 1990
' The re ular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Menton, Texas, was held on March 28, L990, at S:00 p.m, in
the Council Chasbers of the Municipal Building.
Present: Eullne Brock, Jim Engelbrecht, Ivan Glasscock, and Fran
Morgan
I Absent: Judd Holt, William Xamsan, end Etna Kiker
Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for
Planning and Development; Elizabeth Evans, Planning
Administrator; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Renee Baker,
Water/Wastewater; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney;
and Olivia Carson, Clerk-Typist
Chairperson Brock called the meeting to order.
` 1. Consider approval of minutes of the special called meeting
of March 7, 1990.
` It was moved by Ms. Brock, seconded by Mr. hr3elbrecht, and
{Ir unanimously carried (4.0) to approve the minutes of the
March 7, 1990, meeting.
It. Hold :,public hearing and consider approval of the
preliminary and final plat of the Fry Addition, Lot 10R,
Block S; being a replat of Lots 7 and 10, Block 5, and the
south 38 feet of Lot G, Block 5.
Ms. Evans presented the staff report. The tract is 0.821
acres located at the southeast intersection of dniversity
'i Drive and Anna Street. The property is toned commercial and
development of a fast-food restaurant with a drive-through
window is anticipated. The current buildin %nd carwash on
the site will be removed.
Petitioner: Bud Hauptmann, Metroplex Engineering, stated
that he represents the owners. The old Charcoal Broiler
Restaurant and carwash currently on the site will be removed
and a new Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant will be
constructed.
I Ms. Brock asked if the old Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant
will be closed.
Mr. Haupteann said yes. It will be leased or sold. The new
one will have more seating and will meet the current
standards of Kentucky Fried Chicken.
In favor: none present.
Opposed: none present.
Mr. Glasscock moved to approve the preliminary and final
plats of the Fry Addition, Lot IOR, Block 5; being a replat
of Lots 7 and L0, Clock 5, and the south 38 feet of Lot G,
Block S. Seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht and unanimously
carried (4.0).
1 111. Consider extending the Capital Lmproremeat Plan Schedule.
J Mr, Robbins reported that the Finance Department has
received potentially bad news about ad valorem tax
revenues. They will be lowered enough to change the City's
financial targets. Financial targets are dollar amounts
that can be afforded in new general bonds. The figures are
preliminary. More will be received in May and August.
1
i
w.+re a
P&Z Minutes
March 2 8 , 1990
page 2
Staff suggests waiting until May to make a decision on the
CIP so that staff can recommend a more realistic CIP. A
public hearing could be held on June 20, 199D, and final
action could be taken June 27, 1990. That would still meet
the 90 day time frame required to transmit tae Information
to the City Manager.
Ms. Brock asked how close the new schedule would De to the J
absolute deadline.
Mr. Robbins replied that the ClP recommendation must be
transmitted to the City Council by the end of July. The
Council can receive It at any time in July. It is
transmitted to the City Manager and he provides it to the
City Council. This does have to actually be put on a
meeting agenda. It just has to be given to them.
i
It was moved by Mr. Glasscock to extend the CIP schedule as
discussed, seconded by Mr. Engelbrecht, and unanimously
carried (4-0).
IV. Director's Report.
Mr. Robbins reported that work on the zoning ordinance
rewrite will be delayed. Ms. Brady is going to work for the '
City of Dallas. She has over an hour drive to Denton each
day and it has been difficult for her. It is a great talent
that the City of Denton is losing. Hopefully, this will not
delay revisions to the sign ordinance. It usually takes
three months to get a new person and staff will be looking
for ways to pick up the slack. The zoning ordinance will
nave tm wait on the new planner.
V. Discussion of future agenda items.
Mr. Robbins stated that the Greenbelt Plan will be on the
next agenda.
WORK SESSION
I
Discuss Greenbelt Plan.
Mr. Robbins stated that the formal documents for the Greenbelt
Plan will be on the next meeting. No outside discussion has been
planned. During earth month, the City Council will pass a
resolution to be effective on earth day regarding the greenbelt.
The greenbelt is environmentally sensitive. The resolution will
call for it to be shown on the City's approved concept map. The
greenbelt consists of the 100 year floodplain according to fEMA.
The concept map will graphically depict the policy found in the
parks section of the Denton Development Plan (UDP) that says the
100 year floodplain should be a greenbelt. A special section will
be added to the LDP regarding greenbelts and l00 year floodplatn
policy. This section will be more specific than what is stated in
the parks section. The documents for the next meeting will nave
the existing policy statements and ordinances dealing with the
greenbelt and floodplain. It is a voluminous amount of material.
A lot of it relates to drainage. The idea is to leave the
floodplain in its natural state to accommodate flood water. Mr.
Robbins continued to enumerate the purpose of the greenbelt and
the development of policies to protect it. He said that zonln
regulations need to provide incentive to encourage implementation
of the reenbelt plan. today the floodplain tan be developed. It
is diEf~cult to develop in the floodway. Toe developer must prove
that the development will not raise the flood heights an where
else. Between the floodway and the fringe of the floodplain
development is allowed. That is why there needs to be incentives
to leave the floodway natural. The park dedication policy is ■
request. It is not required. Staff is proposing a strategic goal
committee made up mostly of staff to report on the goals that are
4 K V ~ h'w. "q`fj
■
■YgfANIQ
EXCERPT i■■`)
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
` March 21, 1990
i
d, RECEIVE FIRST DRAFT OF UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1991-1995 CAPI70-
PLAN.
Extensive review and discussion took place on this item. Each
Director presented his portion of the draft capital improvements plan
to the Board. No action was taken by the Board at this time. They
did request a special meeting to study the CIP more thoroughly.
Thompson also asked for a copy of the solid waste report. LaForte
k suggested that the Board will need to review several reports from
Solid Waste, and he further requested staff to arrange an orientation
' session between the new departments and the Board.
i
I~
f
F
J
i
~JJ
6819U:7
n vs
Minutes
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Febtuaty 16. 1990
I The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of
1 the City of Denton, Texas, was held on Wednesday. February 14.
h 1990, at S:00 p.m. at the Municipal Building, 215 1. McXinney.
Present: Euline Stock, Jim Engelbreoht. Ivan Glasscock, Judd
Holt, William Kemmam. Etha Kikar, and Fran Morgan
Present from Staff: Lloyd Harrell, City manager: Frank
Bobbins. Executive Dicectot for Planning and Development;
r Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator; Oren Yost, Urban
Planner; Jana Brady, Urban Planner; David Salmon,
Engineering; Lee Allison. Watec/Wastewater: Renee Baker.
Water/Wastewater; Joe Mortis, Assistant City Attorney;
t Cecile Carson. Administrative Analyst: Joe Thompson,
Airport Manager; Jcella Orr, Director of Libtacy: and
l' Olivia Carson, Clerk-Typist
` WORK SESSION
I Discuss Capital Improvement Progcam (CIP)
Mr. Bobbins stated that one of the CIP issues discussed by the
Public Utilities Board (PUB) is the way that $500,000 allotted
for plan lines should be spent. The PUS considered limiting
the money to hot industrial prospects only. It would not be
spent tot commeceial or residential land uses of toe vacant
land.
Mc. Brock asked how this would affect the City-s ability to
help a residential developer in an area where development is
desired.
Mr. Bobbins said it would not have an effect. The previous
policy concerning candidate lines to be evaluated on an ad hoc
basis would cover the situation.
Me. Brock asked it commercial or residential developer would
have some utility line assistance.
Mr. Harrell stated that the PUB discussed It and concluded that
it could be dealt with during the normal CIP process.
{ Ms. Brock clarified that such development would be assisted by
the regular CIP process instead of through plan line.
Mr. Allison said yes. The intent was not to extend lines
futthat out but to served unfilled areas within the City.
No. Morgan Asked if that* are residential &teas within the main
pact of the city that ate not on the sewer system.
Mr. Bobbins said no. Theta ate separate CIP issues for service 1
to people within the City. Another category is residential and
commercial development sad another one is industry. The plan
is to attract industry. Aid must be balanced against imtill.
The City does not want to extend lines too tar out but does
went to attract industry to improve the tax base. He continued
that the PUB will make a recommendation at the April 11, 1990
meeting after a public heating. The Planning and Zoning
commission will have a special meeting on April 18, 1990 fog a
C1P public heating. This will be instead of the previously
+ scheduled April e, 1990 meeting. Me. Bobbins added that a
third issued is using impact fees as a source of CIP funding,
This is not a good time to start that practice. The City must
comply with Senate Bill 176 regarding pro cats water lines.
I
P62 Minutes
February 14, 1990
Page 2
I
I Mr. Allison explained that charging pro cats for lines extended
` by the City is an impact tee. it the line is extended by a
developer. the pro rata is not sn impact fee. To comply with
the SS 176. the over size ordinance will be cleaned up and pro
rata will be eliminated. It is okay to continue collecting pro
cats until June 20. 1990. Out pro vita is a proper
peccentage. After June 20, the legislative amendment must be
ate doing. Alcommltteeacouldobe formednto examine these.ciitas
r developers ate on the review hosed they may be biased but they
will be watchdogs to make sure that fees work. Cost is cost
and they cannot dispute the percentage required to cover it.
Mr. Allison continued that the booster station is under design
and is pact of this year's CIP. The neighbors appeared before
PUB last night and PUB authorized a butted tank design. Only 2
feet of the tanks will be +DOVe ground. The voE. wa split
(1_2). A building will cover the pumps like a small house or
ore15 a hatch years,or
puand mpsthere
everywill
shod.
removalbatbrick
skylighthtoexterior
i
Ms. Brock asked about the landscaping and screening.
Mr. Allison replied that there will three landscaping strips to
aecv as buffers and green apace. The neighbors wanted the
tanks
aanopportunity tanks. foe s
COmmission and CitygCouncilpwillehave for
final review.
rt REGULAR SESSION
Chairperson Brock called the meeting to order.
1. Hold a public hearing on the Capital lmpeovement Plan.
V
David Arno. Chairman of the Ceatoa Airport Board,
reviewed the Boacd's CiP requests with the Commission.
He tald that they must look at the airport's future and
role in North Texas. The State Aeronautics Association
did a study which indicated that the Denton airport will
have a major place in Nocth Texas aviation. The North
Texas Council of Governments had similar findings.
Several major aces. airports are reaching saturation and
are looking tot additional resources. Two airports
ideally suited foe expansion are Denton and McXtnneY.
The City must look at what tole It wants and expects in
the expansion of North Texas all travel. Even it a liege bui
h Da aicpoct Or Could DfCOmeta "Joeaairport onuitsbown.laitec
cannot it theca is no effort exacted. Denton must show
interest in its aicpoct and encoutsge the FAA. He
continued that the master plan foe the airport indicates
a need for ■ second runway. Light aircraft can use the
current runway but a major cunwsy is needed. The Airport
Board recommends that a now mastoc plan foe the aicpoct
be developed. Denton must be a leader and empbaslce Its
role in aviation. It his to walk with the FAA and pay
its share.
Mr. Holt asked what type of aircraft would come to Denton
If the Board had the type of aicpoct it wants.
Mt. Arno replied that DFN and Love will be saturated by
the year 2000. They must be fad by smaller airports or
have their traffic diverted elsewhere. Traffic around
those airports is already bad. Denton his access to a
major highway and can use helicopter aad commuter planes
oeLToxic aiclsvdependinguon theoamount ~of expansioner
t
at other aicpoets. Meachum is already full. Due to its
the Cityn
can g have i a major location airport awhich would senefit tcaffic,
J
i
i
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
February 13, 1990
11. DISCUSS UTILITY DEPARTMENT FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN.
Introduction
r
Nelson stated that this item was placed on the agenda to receive
direction from the Board ano indicated staff is prepared to review
some items on planned CIP issues.
Discussion
LaForte addressed the Board stating that the public hearing was held
and everyone was given a very fair hearing. The public hearing was
closed and tonight the Board will deliberate among themselves.
LaForte asked staff the timetable on the four water storage tanks.
Allison gave the following infon ation:
Tank N1 will be installed in 1990.
Tank #2 will be installed in 1996.
Tank N3 will be installed in 2007.
Tank N4 will be installed in 215.
LaForte asked if it was correct that in 5U years there would be
little difference in casts between the two types of installation, ;
below vs above ground.
I
Allison advised that, assuming city growtt, sakes place as
anticipated, the life cycle cost analysis is:
Above ground storage tanks below 6rounU Storage Tanks
-ST-,e . 0 ~T2-, T""-U S or,
I
S 360,000 difference
i
With proper operatian and maintenance, the underground tanks can last
indefinitely.
Nelson hadt,~000 debt service cost
cot ,U
to $50,000 annual of
per year I thee is also another $18 to
I
maintain underground tanks.
Thompson asked if costs concerning sound abatement were included in
the costs as mentioned. Nelson stated no. However, the issue of
sound level could be addressed by putting an enclosure around the
area.
LaForte asked about any anticipated problems with soil in the area.
Previous reviews regarding underground tanks stated a concern with
soil structure in the area.
I
l
i
}rYi
~}ILt.J} .aPq~
r Excerpt Minutes
4 Page 2
Allison stated this is a concern. The utility will have to watch
back fill conditions and be sure of a stable foundation.
LaForte stated that, obviously, the City can't move from the site,
but could probably go with the underground tank because of the impact
it will have over the whole city. What might be gained in taxes will
M offset the extra cost over a 50 year period.
I Motion
Thompson made a motion that the board return to its original decision
t of underground storage for this facility. Second by LaForte.
1 Vote:
Chew No
f Laney No
Thompson Yes
LaForte Yes
Frady Yes
G
Ration carried, 3-2
I Discussion
I Nelson stated that with that directive, staff will instruct the
engineer to do the design for underground tanks and forward to the
Planning and Zoning commission and the City Council.
LaForte stressed staff must make known to the City Council what has
transpired over this whole issue.
{ 6819U:5-6
I
I
t
I
Vbl U 1 •
t sm wq n..
EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
February 1, 1990
2, WORK SESSION ON UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1991-95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Introduction
Nelson opened the discussion by reviewing with the Board and PdZ
members present the schedule of activities developed for the Utility
Department Five Year Capital Improvements Plan and Budgeting
process, Nelsun explained that, at this time, the Department is
primarily looking at projects for 1995, the previous four year's
being fairly set. He explained the flexibility of the Utility
Uepartment CIP vs General Government CIP, i
Re-organization
Mr. Nelson introduced Charles Watkins of the Solid Waste Department
and Jack Jarvis, Manager of the Garage/vehicle Maintenance. He
explained that there has been a reorganization in the City and Nelson
will assume responsibility for all enterprise departments, i.e.,
Solid Waste, Landfill, Garage, Storm Drainage Utility and the Machine
Shop.
Storm Water Utility JJ
Nelson reviewed the issues regarding stormwater drainage advising 1
that staff is looking at establishing a storm water utility in which
every piece of property in the community is looked at, that
property's contribution to the storm water determined, and it is then
accessed a monthly fee. This fee will help the City to maintain and
construct the water ways that will be required.
Nelson added the storm drainage will continue to straddle between
General Government and Utilities until a five year Capital
Improvements Plan is set up. Solid Waste projects have generally been
programmed in when the projects were needed. The Staff would like to
look at anticipated costs and equipment needed frcm year tj year, to
analyze revenue streams needed. Board/P&Z/CC will be working
together to identify our role in this review process. ~i
Discussion:
LaForte asked how the storm drainage utility would be financed.
Through taxes or a user's fee. Nelson stated that revenues tend to
come in as a user fee. City of Bedford has already set up a
utility. We must begin with a survey, then determine overall flows
(quality/quantity), and establish a rate. For instance, an asphalt
` plant require a much higher fee than a residential area.
I LaForte added that another point to be addressed here is that this is
not something the city is being asked to do, the City has to do this,
and we have to protect the health of the people in the community.
- IIII
h II
1
I
j
Excerppt Minutes
Page 2
Nelson reviewed the revised regulations and advised that the 1972
Clean Water Act listed stormwater as one of the items that needed
cleaning up.
x
3
Ray Roberts Water Plant a~?d Uff-Site Facilities
LaForte requested tnat Nelson explain the issue that will be taming
up in the public hearing regarding the water tank at Hartlee Field
Road, the costs, etc., since this issue will cone to them when the
Utility Department goes to the PAZ for platting.
Nelson advised that about two years ago a site selection study was
conducted for the water plant at Lake Ray Roberts, the pump to
Uenton, and a place for a storage tank and pump. A storage facility
was needed on the north end of town. 'ihe Utility already has a plant
on the south end of town and the city can get economies of scale by
using the north side for installation of the water storage tank. The
site selected is on a direct route from the Lake to the east, on a
anda is not site has s suan Arco
gas hill line, where puyou mp can save pressure,
itable
for building homes.
Nelson advised that the site selection was reviewed and approved by
to
apPAZ, proved approved the puchse the of PAZ the and submitted
property.
the douncil,1t who t also the
Council,
the City
The artist rendition of the site and installations were shown to
those present.
Chairman of the PAZ requested staff to indicate on a map the site
location in relation to any houses in the area. This was done.
Considerable discusa on continued regarding the location of the
facilities in relation to the neighborhood.
Nelson advised that the underground tanks originally proposed by the
Board would be cast in place, built into the hill, and a considerable
amount of landscaping is planned.
Development Plan Water A Sewer Lines
The Board discussed with the PAZ the issue concerning the current
Development Plan Water and Sewer Lines policy. The Board stated that
after a one year use of this policy, it has been determined that the
policy does not work. Although the Utility is willing to set aside
the $500,000 per year for industrial development, such industrial
development must be a committed prospect, the term hot prospect"
recinded
u be re-defined,
pothe licyol recommended i to o the i City be
effective that
a new, agre , and
that the Utility will abandon the position of "leading growth and
move to one of "responding" to growth. This will be a more cost
effective policy.
6819U:1-2
y„1
! qy
i
t EXCERPT
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES
February 7, 199U
2. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1991-95 CAPITAL
PLAN.
IMFKIJVLMLNIb LaForte opened the hearing by explaining to those in attendance that
they could come forward to address the Board, give their name and
address, and make their statements. He advised they would be given
unlimited time to present their views and concerns.
After each person gave their presentation, the Lhairman asked for
further comments or questions from those present. After receiving an
uutline of the CIP process by Nelson, the citizens were heard in the
following order:
Mr. Lloyd aaliard presented general concerns to the Board regarding
the above groan water tank for 'lartlee Field Road.
Mr. Fritz Po stated he was concerned because his house was right
nex o w ere the above ground tank would be placed. He felt the
Board ought to consider accessing to Sherman Drive.
Mr. Ray McFarland spoke in favor of underground concrete tanks and
rev ewe tne possiole life cycle costs of the project. he also
stated that the soil formations were appropriate for such underground
installations.
Mrs. Mitchell advised she was most concerned about the visual effect
o the tancfs, the property value impact of the proposed above ground
tanks and also, the future of the small tract of ground betweer. her
home and the treatment plant.
Mr. Wait Parker was in attendance to lend support to the
oresen a ons o he residents of the area.
MrsF, Nancy Beck stated the noise of the pumps was of great concern
ol~er:
Mr. Jim Roberts indicated that property devaluations were
Inevitable. e w ole spirit of the community would be changed.
Mrs. Beta Lou Dobson spoke of concerns regarding aesthetics and the
Tss older o-fi me as she envisioned it. She lives 323' from the site.
Mr. Paul Reece mentioned litigation.
Mr. Earl Shaffer stated he is an adjacent owner and is very concerned
aoou e he S of above ground tanks and the fact that people will
have to come across his property through the right-of-way, and no one
has spoken with him about that.
a j
Except minutes
Page 2
" Mrs. Barbara Russell stated she is concerned about beautification
an an values.
Mr. auddy_ Cole, County Commissioner, was there to support the
citizens o ar lee Field area as their official representative. He
stated the property owners had asked him to state their concerns
regarding property values, chemical storage, sound of the pumping
units and aesthetics. He commented he was pleased to hear the
Board's statements that they will look into some of these areas.
Mr. Wayne Dockery stated he was spokesman for the group and reviewed
areas o concern, i.e., environment, property values, aesthetics,
noise and beautification.
Ms. Norma Gamble came forward to state for the record that they now
understand a contract to install water on Bonnie Brae Street was due
soon, but wanted to request sewer service for their neighborhood.
There being no further public comment, it was the consensus of the
Board to re-study the above ground storage tank issue taking into
consideration the expressed concerns of those present. Chairman
Laforte closed the Public Hearing and adjourned the meeting at
approximately 9:00 PM.
6819U:3-4
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
t
CITY
COUNCIL
TITTI
ITT L ti
T. I
i
IT Ll
i
I
p~0 c r n C(j
r ~ th
op0; 1o p~
o° c ~
rt=
o 0
I ~0~~ r o M t t oO~p
oo~~cact~o~
i
I
I
vY
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: Condemnation - Willowsprings Drainage Project
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve resolution authorizing condemnation of the easements in
the Geo Prock Estate Tract
SUMMARY:
Stanley Lattman, attorney for the above mentioned estate has
not responded to several letters and numerous telephone calls
to settle this matter
BACKGROUND:
To facilitate the planned improvements to the existing drainage
channel, additional easements must be secured. These easements
are necessary to accommodate the relocation of a sanitary sewer
line and adequate construction maneuverability during
construction of the drainage and utilities.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Capital Improvements Project, Transportation and Engineering
Department and Utility Department/Drainage Division
FISCAL IMPACT:
The drainage improvements will reduce maintenance cost by
concreting portions of the channel and making a typical section
(sloping sides to 3 to 1 grade).
0773E
I
N4`
Y
9
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF REAL PROPERTY
NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NEAR WILLOW
SPRINGS DRIVE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton has determined
that it is necessary to acquire the easements described herein in
order to make certain drainage and utility improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has been unable to agree with the
owners of the real property upon the value of the easements to be
acquired; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION I. That the City Attorney of the City of Denton iq
authorized and directed to bring condemnation proceedings to obtain
the following easements:
A. Permanent utility and drainage easements in Tracts I and
II as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, for the purpose of
cons3'ructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, and
ma'_ntaining stormwater drainage improvements and
utilities in, upon, and across the land, with the right
of having ingress and egress in and across the land for
those purposes.
B. A temporary easement in the land described in Exhibit
"B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, for the purpose of permitting the agents and
contractors of the City to enter upon the property with
vehicles, tools, and equipment to make temporary dumps
of excavated soil and construction material, and to do
whatever is necessary to make the proposed drainage and
utility improvements within the permanent easements
described above.
SECTION It. That this resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval.
F
t'
t ~
r
k
1
I1 yt
f W'"4T Y
k PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1990.
r
' BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
i
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
k BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
f BY:
Q
prockre
f
~ I
~r
i
i I
E '
II i
I '
I
i
i
r
EXHIBIT
M TRACT I
ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and
being part of the S.C. Hirams Survey, Abst, No. 616 and being
part of Lot No. 1, Block A of the Shady or.ks Industrial Park
Subdivision, an rtdiofoa tracteof 11 land and Cconveyedf fDromtGabriel
part
also of being
Milton paspit, Jr. to George Prock, et al by deed dated February
28, 1980 and recorded in Volume 1003, Page 703 of the Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described
as follows:
BEGINNING at the westerly northwest corner of said Lot 1, said
point also lying in the south boundary line of an existing 60'
drainage and public utility easement and the east right-of-way
line of a north/south public road known as Duncan Street, said
point also being the beginning of a curve to the left having a
chord
radius of 69.3610 a central angle of 530 53 13.99, and
bearing and length of north 660 35' 31.5' east, 62.8611 ,
THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the left, same being the
northwest boundary line of said Lot 1 and the southeast boundary
utility easement an arc
to drainage a point a for public
line of said 601
corner;
lists
THENCE south 500 21' 10' east a distance of 10.0' to a point
for corner!
THENCE south 390 38' 50.0' west a distance of 40.0' to the
beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 100'0 a
central angle of 250 50' 31.00, and a chord bearing and length
of south 520 34' 05.5' west, 44.72'1
THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the right an arc
distance of 45.10' to a point for cornea
THENCE south 390 38' 50.0' west a distance of 11.49' to a point
lying in the west boundary line of said Lot 1 and the east right-
of-way lint of said Duncan Street for corners
THEECE north 030 32' 20' east. along the west boundary line of
s'A: Lot 1 and the east right-of.-way line of said undcanantreet a
dia:ance of 48.33 to the Place of Beginning
'.718.57 square feet of land.
i
r
4 t
1
i
EXHIBIT 'A' (Con't)
i TRACT II
ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and
being part of the S.C. Hirams Survey, Abst. No. 616 and being
part of Lot No. 2, Block A of the Shady Oaks Industrial Park
Subdivision, an addition to the City and County of Denton, and
also of being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Gabriel
Milton Daspit, Jr, to George Prook, et al by deed dated February
28, 1980 and recorded in Volume 1003, Page 703 of the Deed
` Records of Denton County, Texas, and more Earticularly described '
M as follows:
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Lot 2, said point also
lying in the south boundary line of an existing 60' drainage and
public utility easement and the west right-of-way line of a
north/south public road known as Willow Springs Drivel
THENCE south 30 32' 20' west along the east boundary line of
said Lot 2 and the west right-of-way line said Willow Springs
Drive a distance of 10.0' to a point for corner;
i THENCE north 850 49' 00' west 10.0' south of and parallel to
the north boundary line of said Lot 2 a distance of 20.45' to the
beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 37.61, a !
central angle of 540 32' 24.60, and a chord bearing and length
of south 660 54' 54' west, 34.461;
THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the left 10.0' southeast
II of and parallel to the northwest boundary line of said Lot 2 an
arc distance of 35.79' to a point lying 10.0' southeast of and
perpendicular to the northwest boundary line of said Lot 2 for
I Corner)
THENCE north 500 21' 10' west a distance of 10.0' to a point
lying in the northwest boundary line of said Lot 2 and southeast
r boundary line of said 60' drainage and public utility easement,
I said point also being the beginning of a curve to the right
having a radius of 47.61, a central angle of 540 321 21.60, and
l a chord bearing and length of north 660 54' 54.2' east, 43.621;
_J THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the right an arc distance
of 45.31' to a point for cornea
THENCE south 850 49' 00' east along the north boundary line of
said Lot 2 and the south boundary line of said 60' drainage and
f public utility easement a distance of 20.34' to the Place of
Beginning and containing 609.47 square feet of land.
I
f
I
V
R
1
EXHIBIT 'B'
ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and
being part of th S.C. Hirams Survey, Abst. No. 616 and being
part of Lots No. i and 2, Block A of the Shady Oaks Industrial
' Park Subdivision, an addition to the City and County of Denton,
and also of being part of a tract of land as conveyed from
Gabriel Milton Daspit, Jr. to George Prock, et al by deed dated
4 February 28, 1980 and recorded in Volume 1003, Page 703 of the
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly
described as follows:
COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said Lot 2, said point also
lying in the south boundary line of an existing 60' drainage and
public utility easement and the west right-of-way line of a
` north/ south public road known as Willow Springs Driver a
` THENCE south 30 32' 20' west along the east boundary line of
said Lot 2 and the west right-o£-way line said Willow Springs 1
Drive a distance of 10.0' to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
t THENCE south 30 32' 20' west along the east boundary line of
said Lot 2 and the west right-of-way line of said Willow Springs
Drive a distance of 40.0' to a point for corner; j
t THENCE north 850 49' 00' west 50.0' south of and parallel to
I the north boundary line of said Lot 2 a distance of 19.67' to a
!f point for corner;
THENCE south 390 38' 50' west 50.0' southeast of and parallel
to the northwest boundary line of said Lot 21 passing the south
boundary line of Lot 2 and the north boundary line of said Lot 1
and continuing for a total distance of 679.28' to a point lying
I~ in the x?st bo uldary line of said Lot 1 and the east right-of-way
line of y nortr. south public road known a$ Duncan Street for
corner;
THENCE north 30 32' 20' east along the west boundary line of
said Lot 1 and the east right-of-way line of said Duncan Street a {
distance of 84.84' to a point for corner;
THENCE north 390 38' 50' east a distance of 11.49' to the
beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.0', a II
central angle of 250 50' 3150 and a chord bearing and length of
north 520 34' 05.5' east, 44.721;
! THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the left an arc distance
of 45.10' to a point for corner;
~I
` I
I
t I
I
I j
it
I ~
I
l'♦ V v
7
r
1
EXHIBIT 'B' (Con't)
i
THENCE north 390 38' 50' east a distance of 40.0' to a point
lying 10.0' southeast of and perpendicular to the northwest
boundary line of said Lot 1 for corner)
THENCE north 500 21' 10" west a distance of 10.0' to a point
lying in the northwest boundary line of said Lot 1 and the
southeast boundary line of said 60' drainage and public utility
easements
THENCE north 390 38' 50' east along the northwest boundary line
of said Lot 1 and the southeast boundary line of said 60'
drainage and public utility easement, passing the northerly
northwest corner of said Lot 1 and the southwest corner of said '
Lot 2 and continuing along the northwest boundary line of said
Lot 2 and southeast boundary line of said 60' drainage and public
utility easement for a total distance of 516.89' to a point for
corner)
THENCE soi:ch 500 21' 10' east a distance of 10.0' to the
beginninc of a curve to the right having a radius of 37.61, -a
central angle of 540 32' 258, and a chord bearing and length of
north 660 54' 54' east, 34.4611
THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the right 10.0'
southeast of and parallel to the northwest boundary line of said
Lot 2 an arc distance of 35.79' to a point for cornerl
THENCE south 850 49' 00' east 10.0' south of and parallel to
the north boundary line of said Lot 2 a distance of 20.45' to the
Place of Beginning and containing 33115,49 square feet of land.
i
'I
I
I,
r
I
1
1
I
y11 a ~ Mew..,
7
Ecxhib if 'A"
x
7t' k re i
4D^+vAVe $ 0
o
. , Qo '~y
0 /f
Exhi6i~~A /L
orwAC r z
DA14NAbt J
dT/L. ~f.IY. ~.'i
I
Ill . t r~
CITY
COUNCIL
~o~ouao o +o~
O~Ow ' All
tOO
O ` 4
d
O
O N 4 GJ
~DDDDL GGG~~
t
I i
1
I
CITY of ORNTON / 215 F. McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201
' MEMORANDUM
i
k DATE: June 20, 1990
I TO: John P. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
` FROM: Harlan L. Jeff4:rson, Treasurer
SUBJECT: REVISED INVESTMENT POLICY
Per your request, I nave reviewed the City's current investment policy to
identify needed changes to bring it in compliance with the auditor's request.
Additionally, our policy was also reviewed by representatives of the
i Government Treasurer's Organization of Texas (GTOT). The GTOT recommendations
are based upon a standard set of essentials/desirable elements for an
investment policy. The recommcndations from both organizations have been {
placed in thirteen (13) general categories which are listed below.
1
As noted in the auditor's 1990 management letter, all of their
recommendations, and the majority of the total recommendations, have been
` implemented. However, the investment policy has not been updated to reflect
If these changes. The phrase 'current practice" under the status column
represents the recommendations with which we have already complied. It is our
intent to address all of the recommendations in the revised investment policy,
unless otherwise notified by you, the Investment Committee or City Council. Y
RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS
i
1. Legal Authorizations. The GTOT Implemented in
legal authorizations for in- the new policy
vestments in state law and
city ordinance or charter
J are not referenced in the
policy. These should be
referenced and, if possible,
a copy attached as an aopendix
for informational purposes.
t j
J
~ I
40A A
f
it ~N4L,Y+'Y
John F. McGrane
June 20, 1990
Paqe 2
I
RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE SPAiGS
II. Cash Manaanment. The Invest- GTOT Implemented in
ment guidelines were not the new policy
described in the larger context
of cash management. Since
investment function is actually
only part of the overall cash
management program which includes
controlling and coordinating cash
inflows and outflows, banking
relationships, debt management
and other functions, it is helpful
to describe it in this context.
III. Limited Liability. It is GTOT Implemented in
recommended that a section the new policy
be added that states the
limits of personal liability
for investment staff acting
in full conformance with this
` policy. This could be presented
alonq with the prudent man law
as general guidelines for
staff actions.
iv. Collateralization. The policy GTOT Implemented in
should state that collateral the new policy
is to be safekept by an
'independent third party.'
This third party can be made a
party of the governing contract
with the bank (for purchase of
CDs).
Collateral should not be GTOT implemented in
aafekept within the same bank the new policy
holding company as that from
which the CDs are being
purchased.
i
Collateral should he valued GTOT and Auditors Current
at slightly more than the book practice
value (Principal plus accrued
interest) of the investment.
A reasonable and recognized
ratio for collateral is An
amount not less than 1021.
i
i
I
I
I
1
t'. 'd Y M r
I
lv!.N t: 1Y1 i~
i John F. McGrane
June 20t 1990
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY ,'ECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS
A 'original' safe keeping GTOT and Auditors Current
f receipts (with the wording practice
'pledged to the City of Denton') (except for
must be received by the City to banks)
evidence collateral. Sign-off
for substitution and release
then are functions of the
safekeeping receipt.
;
V. Competitive Bidding. The GTOT Current
investment policy does not practice
specifically require competitive
biddinq of all investments.
This is strongly recommended by
the GTOT panel. All securities-
CDs and other money market
securities-can fluctuate for
pure market reasons and all
should receive three bids.
VI. Swaps. The Investment policy GTOT Current
does not reference swaps or practice
swapping criteria. If the City
engages In swapping, or plans
to in the future, it may wish
to define criteria, objectives,
lose limitations, etc.
VII. Contractual Agreements. The GTOT Current
policy did not reference or practice
describe guidelines for any
contractual arrangements -
` except one reference to the
depository agreement. Since
contracts are en essential
element of the internal controls
I system, it is recommended
that the city requir. certain
arrangements be formalized
in contractual form. The following
contracts should be considered:
o wire Transfer Authori29tions
o Collateral Safekeepinq and
Substitution Aqreements 1
o Master Repurchase Agreements
` )PSA)
I o Depository Aqreements for
CDs purchase only
I
l ~
f i
1 a
i
I
j
f
I
i
I..w♦ .,xr.,.,
John F, McGrane
June 20, 1999
Page 4
PECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS
VIII. Repurchase Agreements. To GTOT and Auditors Current
r strengthen the policies regarding practice
repurchase agreements, the City
should consider rmendinq the
investment policy to:
' o Require no less than 102%
collateralization of
repurchase agreements.
o include a time limit for re-
purchase agreements of no more
than 30-days.
o Include a listing of approved
securities for use as
collateral.
Repurchase agreements under state GTOT Current
law are restricted to banks practice ,
domiciled in Texas and primary
broker/dealers. The limit of
authorized investments should
so state to avoid any problems
l or misinterpretation.
1 Ix. Responsibility. The policy GTOT Current
f` did nut explicitly state practice
that records of inver'..~:nt
! transaction should t~ ke,':
or by whom. The City 'r oenton
should consider adding a section
on this matter since record JI
keeping is so critical a A
` function.
f z
Banks where cash is held and Auditors Current '
which allow transfers between practice
I
! accounts by phone should be
provided with a list of authorized
accounts. In addition, there
1
should be a maximum amount
/ allowed by phone.
~J Also, the person at the City Auditors Current I
who made the transfer by phone practice
should complete a transfer
` notice and qive it to the proper
M Finance Department personnel.
f J
I
I~
r +
f
C
I
John P, McGrane
June 20, 1990
Page S
RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS
The transfer confirmation
received from the bank should
he agreed with this notice
and the appropriate journal
' entry made.
X. Pooling. The policy seems to GTOT Current
imply that separate investments practice
are madf for each fund in the
city. If this is the case, the
k City should consider pooling its
I investments to simplify record-
keepine, make liquidity easier to
managE, and increase yield without
4 any additional risks.
XI. Market Loss. Tht policy GTOT Implemented in
addreRses market loss and states the new policy
that 'funds should not be
exposed to market price risk.'
However, every security - even
li overnight - faces some market
price risk. It should be an
objective co recognize and
avoid market risk at all times
but the use of 'shall not'ir,
the objectives unfairly places
liability on the investing
` staff.
f XII. Reporting, It is strongly GTOT Implemented in
recommended that the 'quarterly' the new policy
reporting guidelines called for
in the policy be changed to a
monthly reporting requirement.
I' XIII. Investment Securities. GTGT Current
Investment section of the policy practice
lists CDs at commercial banks
as acceptable investments. To
fully satisfy state law and
-J clarify the issue, it is
recommended that this be expanded
to say of banks domiciled in
I Texas,
I
I,
I
1
I
I
I
l M+,`ri
} John F. McGrane
June 20, 1990
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION/CATEGORY RECOMMENDATION SOURCE STATUS
• ~ .rv
Althouqh not prohibited by law, Auditors No longer
currently cities in the State of applicable
Texas are discouraged by current
state guidelines from depositing
funds in savings and loans
institutions, The City should
consider amending its investment
policies to reflect the current
environment.
The revised investment policy also contains two changes initiated by staff.
The first change will allow us to purchase U.S. Treasury securities that
mature within five (5) years as opposed to only three W years. This will
provide an opportunity to increase our yield when funds are earmarked for
projects that will not occ.ir for sometime. The second change will permit us
to utilize regional brokers/dealers. This will increase cne competitiveness
of our bidding process.
If you have any questions or comments, ple-wse do not hesitate to contact me.
L. Jeffs ^
ar1arn
wp
2521k
i
!1
r
RESOLUTION NO.
4 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REVISED INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF
DENTON TO REPLACE THE EXISTING INVESTMENT POLICY; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHFRFAS, the Director of the Department of Finance for the
city of Denton has presented a proposed policy regarding the
investment o;: certain City funds to replace the existing investment
policy and the purpose of the policy revision is to maintain a
minimum of cash available to meet daily needs of the City and to
provide protection for the City's principal while receiving the
hiuhest, yield possible for investing temporary excess cash; and
VHERFAS, the City Council desires to adopt such revisions to
the official policy regarding investment of certain funds of the
city; PIOw, THEREFORE,
TAI] COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECT-1014 I. the following policy revis'on, attached and made
a hart hereof, is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City
of Denton, Texas:
Investment Policy (Reference No. 403.06)
SECTIOCI II. This policy replaces Investment Policy Reference
409.04.
No.
SECTIQtLL13. A copy of Investment Policy Reference No. 403.06
shall be file, in the official records of the City of Denton with
the City Secretary.
Sf_;C'PIOII _ IV. Th,-t this resolution shall become effective
im~,,,ediately upon its passage and approval.
r PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of , 1990.
J
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
I
k
t ~
ATTEST:
I A JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY I
r 9
BY:
- - -
r
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
j DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
By:
investm. L•es
Y
,
f ,I
k~
f
• I
I
i
I
I
I
MeA
I~
1
CITY j
COUNCIL
f '
1
A
i
1
1
C
I
I
I
~ fHU
q
o 79
~ OOf , ~ 1
DOOG o N t 4
~C~CdGCCC~
I
I
I
tr~ ' I
I
I
I
I
I
•
S
ti August 21, 1990
R
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
RE: REVIEW AND CONSIDER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval of the attached Infrastructiire
Financing Policy.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND
In August, 1988, the Denton Development Plan recommended an
economic growth incentive policy that promoted balanced
growth throughout the city. In response to this
recommendation, the Public Utilities Board and the Planning
and Zoning Commission, in a joint meeting in February 1989
approved the Guidelines for Funding and Selecting
Development Plan Candidate Water and Sewer Lines. These
Guidelinea prescribed a process by which the Utility
Department's Capital Improvements Plan would set aside up to
$500,000 annually for water and sewer lint construction to
encourage economic growth in selected areas of the City.
The Guidelines also prescribed rating and ranking criteria
by which such lines would be selected for construction. In
March 1989, the Guidelines were approved by City Council and
in May 19890 the Board considered funding of lines along
Marseh Branch Road.
The Board also expressed its concern that several of the
Guidelines' top-ranked lines were in the southern part of
the City where economic growth was already sufficient.
Therefore,the Board proposed a revised Guidelines policy
that abandoned the rating and ranking criteria and provided
construction funds only for lineE serving industrial
prospects.
Page 2
Infrastructure Financing Policy
During its April 3, 1990, meeting, the City Council reviewed
the revised Guidelines and expressed its concern with the
I Board's fundamental revision of policy. Therefore, the
Council directed the Board and the Commission to form a '
joint committee to re-examine revised policy. Pursuant to E
the Council's instructions, a committee was formed and held
its first meeting on July 10, 1990. The Commictee reviewed
the new Infrastructure Financing Policy, recommended some
I changes, but otherwise gave the Policy its tentative
approval. The Committee agreed to meet again for final
Policy review on July 20, 1990. At this meeting, the final
approval was given.
The Public Utilities Board approved the document on July 23,
1990, and the Planning and Zoning Commission gave their
final approval on August 8 , 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
Both the current Guidelines and the proposed Infrastructure
Financing Guidelines call for up to $500,000 of annual
Utility Department Capital Improvements Plan funding. No
other fiscal impacts are anticipated.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED
City of Denton Utilities, Developers, Citizens of the
Community, new prospects.
WV fullbitted,
, Harrell, Cie Manager
Pre 7d/Ap oved by:
Ir E. Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
Exhibit I Candidate Line History
J 11 Proposed Infrastructure Financing Guidelines
III Irfrastructure Financing/Economic Analysis Model }
IV Proposed Application for Infrastructure Assistance
V Minutes PUB Meeting of 1/23/90
VI Minutes CC Meeting of April 3, 1990
VII Minutes of P&Z Meeting of A!:u S_ 1990
it
r
~ r
3 ,
CANDIDATE LINE HISTORY
Prior to 1988, the Utility Department expended thousands of
dollars constructing water and sewer lines in selected areas
of the city in order to encourage growth in those areas.
Unfortunately, growth in those areas failed to materialize.
In August, 1988, the City council approved and published the
Denton Development Plan prepared by the City's Land Use
Development Committee. One of the Committee's findings was
that the City's infrastructure financing policy tended to
follow growth instead of responding to growth and that this
policy contributed to growth toward the southeast. The
Committee felt that this policy should be changed to one
that promoted balanced growth throughout the City.
In response to the Development Plan, the Public Utilities
Board in November, 1988 proposed a Utility Department
infrastructure financing policy that would promote balanced
economic growth throughout the city. Pursuant to this
policy, a list of over 100 possible routes for residential
and commercial lines was solicited from the public and
staff.
In February, 1989, the Public Utilities Board and the
Planning and Zoning Commission jointly approved the
Guidelines for Funding and Selecting Develo man! Plan
Candidi ce water and Sewer Lines to mplement t e new
infrastructure financing policy. The Guidelines prescribed a
procedure by which the Utility Department Capital
Improvement Plan annually allocated up to $500,000 for water
and sewer Candidate Line construction. The Guidelines also
established a criteria by which the list of proposed
Candidate Lines would be rated and ranked, and selected for
construction. In March, 1989, the Guidelines were approved
by the city council.
In May, 1989, the Utility Department staff completed the
rating and ranking of the Candidate Lines and presented them
to the Board for approval. The Board expressed its concern
that several of the top-ranked Lines were in the southern
part of the City where economic growth was already
sufficient and did not need the stimulus of special funding.
J Finally, the Board approved funding for a combination of
Lines near and along Mauch Branch Rd. in the far western
area of the City. However, due to a lack of support from
many landowners along Mauch Branch Rd. as well as Utility
Department budget constraints during the 1989 fiscal year,
the Board declined to recommend funding of these Lines to
the City Council.
wwwff
E~
F ,
' CANDIDATE LINE HISTORY
PAGE 2
The Board continued to express its concerns about the
Guidelines' selection process. Consequently, the Candidate
k r. Line funding and selection process was put in abeyance until
January, 1990. At that time, the Board proposed a revised
Guidelines policy that would follow rather than lead
economic growth The new policy would also do away with the
rating and ranking of proposed Lines and would make funds
available only to construct Lines that would serve
industrial prospects which had committed to building
facilities in Denton.
` At its April 3, 1990 meeting, the City Council expressed its
concerns regarding the Board's fundamental revision of
Guidelines' policy. Therefore, it directed the Board and the
Planning and zoning Commission to further examine the
proposed policy change. Consequently, these two bodies
appointed two members each to jointly examine the revised
policy, its implementation, and its integration with the
city's overall economic development policy.
i J
I
i
_ I
i~
I
I
i
i
i
i '
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE
SUBJECT:
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING
~ n
TITIEt
WASTEWA0 -y INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING GUIDELINES
TILITIE
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Funding Policy
The City of Denton Utilities Department policy is to facilitate
local economic growth through a program of infrastructure financing.
During its annual review of the Utility Uepart,nent's Capital
Improvements Plan (CIP), the Public Utilities Board shall consider
the allocation of up to $500,000 annually to finance the construction
of infrastructure water and/or sewer lines. This allocation shall
consist of $250,000 from the dater CIP and $250,000 from the
Wastewater CIP.
That portion of each annual allocation that remains unobligated
at close of the fiscal year shall carry forward into the
following fiscal year. However, the cumulative total of said
unobligated annual allocations shall not oxceed $2 million at
any time.
Selection Policy
Infrastructure financing shall be provided only toe
` 1) industrial prospects which have committed to building
facilities in Denton
21 commercial/retail prospects which have committed to building
facilities in Denton and which:
a) sell a majority of their goods or services to individuals
or businesses outside of D-:nton, and/or
b) manufacture goods for conhumption in Denton which were
previously manufactured o,ltside of Denton
3) Corporate headquarters prospects which have committed to
building facilities in Denton
All requests for Infrastructure financing shall be subject to
the economic analysis detailed in this Policy. This analysis
shall determine project costs and benefits over a five year. {
Infrastructure financing shall be available only if project
benefits exe equal to or ex.eed project costs.
EXHIBIT/
~ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE
}
` Page 2`
For purposes of the economic analysis:
Project costs shall consist of 100$ of: n
I R,~
I F . debt service associated with the subject line's
construction, and
. return on investment associated with the completed
subject line
. Project benefits shall consist of 251 of:
revenue from ad valorum tax on prospect's local property,
plant and equipment
. revenue from sales tax on prospect's products and
services sold by the Denton facility
revenue from sales tax on local purchases by the
Denton-resident labor force generated by prospect's
locating in Denton
and 1001 of:
1
. revenue from sales tax on prospect's local purchase of
its facility's construction materials
. revenue from that portion of the prospect's local
consumption of Denton utilities that is contributed
toward the return on investment
Funding of prospects shall be based on their dates of
application; i.e., first come, first served
Lines under consideration shall begin at an existing City
main line and end at closest technically feasible edge of
the prospect's property
The funding recommendation shall state funding limits for
the total project and its construction components as well
as a time limit on the funding committment
. Funds shall be disbursed to the prospect or the prospect's
designee only as follows:
1) upon presentation of a Certificate of occupancy for
4 the prospect's Denton facility, or
2) in intermittment payments as construction of the subject
utility line progresses
unexpended project funds shall be returned to the infrastructure
financing account
C
A, Ilk
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY / PROCEDURE
APPlication Process Page--j.
Step 1 O
Infrastructure Financing applications shall be available e~
from the City's Economic Development Office. This Office 41 Pt shall:
. provide prospect with economic assistance information
. provide prospect with an application form and assist
with its completion
notify affected Departments of prospect's application
coordinate the prospect's access to City Departments
prepare an economic assistance package for the prospect
Step 2
Completed applications shall be returned to the Economic
Development office which shall forward a copy of the
prospect's completed application to:
Planning Department - prepares land use analysis
Utilities Department - prepares five year economic analysis,
and technical and cost assessment of providing utility service
to the prospect
Step 3
The Public Utilities Board shall review the prospect's
application, the technical issues of providing utility service
to the prospect, and the completed economic analysis and forward
a reccmmendation for funding consideration to the Planning and
zoning Commission.
Such recommendation may support the prospect's request for a
variance of those provisions of the Sub-Division ordinance
regarding the extension of utility lines.
Step 4
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the prospect's
application, a completed land use analysis, and the economic
Board and
forward analysis borecoendation from th ecommendations to the the b City Utilities Council.
forw
i
J CLPOLICY.DOC
I if lr St 1000 I1 111C I10 otul,itr If 1L1511 IOrIL
in I
! Ill. IIC.
42 19 bortolltiol Jclrfeh
t lf IY. Illy Ifrircipal rot ZI two bt 61111 leer 1111
1
J hallln vtkolw S rime
I Ill trio. III lat. Cad.
1 Felt it Iwt 11t. lot. Yet. Id.
i I'palnrtilo Poet: Ifl,rJr erlwtN it? 001111
I De De I 112 "1 11.111 1/101 !1.111 111,10
pu4 nt still
I luihl Beet 1 OR. t/f 1.111 LIB 1.111 10,411
'
11 1 ILltl 1.111 I'M 1.111 Woll
I1 belt Itrrrr: 141,110 fYJI hills? VAIM 1 16,411 1.111 Iu0 J.41 14 610
!
Ilrislllle r1 l•S! J1.111 1•fa $,111 1.111 ILIIr
It
Il stir! Lateredl retell 11.1u1 111, 13 111.11f
I
It tetra a lerertuaf I6f10.._.............
if tN loua1111
11
.
II Cgitel blot rate!: IF.lIf WJ titer 111, II of II
11 IV IDtll Serrire 1 tLll Collis fs llrolbest Cdedd f
11 Ieeefdl 1ot11' IJ.tll I101 Isle I ~ IJnrlrr W I!er lilt lad 11 IDIr
21 Ie1 lalall ladled bee 11
CI lei lreflt: 11l,1L1 r•• !ultra hit a1. II from lire 1e. 11 rest 1111 no0 leolol, II1IIrI Mil I 1 f
me.nruv
I Ifaru0 11'101 It; All 11 IIr
i 1lIVI 1•IID IJIYI 1111
1 11.101 I.III 71,1o1 1.61
I rllol 1.111 II,111 Llii
I }J,{rI 1 14 ll 10.011 1 111
latifs 111.111 1111.041 111.111
1
.
I
I
I
I
I
{ 1
s
a~u a
10 Will II PAlt'f IJ 1 GM11I1r ML1311 loll
PI
I It go lits
1 Applinll'I OLl'I pee let
1 Iropertl. tlly't fill I fueel late ImbW let lei
! hilt 1 William To 141 It lot tell site
I gin Olelt mail tolaelloo hot tell Was tier 1 Ieua
1
r I Y Y 1 1 r 1
I hapertl lei InnYn 11,110401 r 191 171.Ioo 7 Wal Y 117.177 1 01 + 11,111 1 1 !earl 10.156
It
11 CiLl's Ste Ott
It ipplicul 1 ht3'1 A3a14t lute 131041 Itl far
11 hlclettl WIN for 11 lei Lool leer
It land falls foe Leef Woo LeYI 7 lout
If
16 tells 111 lerrnc r 0 r 1 1 1
If ten 1`11INtlllilrlltel 11.100.101 1 11.11 + II1ju t gill + 119,111 1 1 Ie•ls I I10.1r9
II
IS
11 fortest II ht be I at lei, IYlrll
71 IpP[icaH's Later force Llhr here total meth stlirp Doll
77 lit tell Ii filial it Urul 11 lee lots Wat fate I haAltrtt
11 Letter lilt* kills hotel I7lelo0 Iflee[ei 117th.
LI 1
11 r r r r r r
It feel maple seat s 1 617 1 17.1 1 1 e 71.1 1 iB,lul i ,
I}
!I
D total late[ illegal r
fi Inlsl Ius alallr City's Su let
71 loran at latest ill rilr'N A3I141 Sole Aa1l.[ let fu i
fi Illntel Pnplitlele lffeclel Wet tot It ht troy leer
7I tabor filet 11COI LUIr torte FAR tell WIN Lam I LuI
II 1 I 1 r r r r .
11 1111,167 1 101 a MUM 1 10.11 + '1171 1 171 - 1111 1 I fear$ a 11.11!
Wee 11: lilt Peecealife r preielll flat Pirelli IF war let 1141140 Ilpedrl is It In 1311111 tlls IPllinat 061 ell 1e t+lsepafll
ettOo[el to tetralrechrl Auleluu,
Note of: llil nlilr reprlslsU low hotn-r lilnt lsplortes laett'el IF lie s1ylLceet't Itcttill it Plstos.
i [A3tRUCIVI[ IIMJACIMGCCbIbAIC ANALISH LAIL
PIG[ 1
art Wled
Caapraclial Itlre at
Cud of Nttil111 it Caeslracteol Cltr't (III'1 tee let
AIIl IC111'1 Itfnll It fit or kits 84111 fail tl Not I 1loaal Ott fu
NCIIII? Coutnctm )atdned 14A toI I1 141 tool lrlr
Cult !1141191 loW Leff )rite Leo{ I Ina
I 54111 NA Iefesfr: e t e r 1 e e
1 free Clastwhn IN1311 1 SU1 + Ili{,tYY 7 1411 + 1111 t 11W 1 11.111 1 1 IOr 1 I4J31
1
1 L Coltniollol I Ca a l r l Eat I Ca
I b1t1l1 lat. al 11 t1
1 liftoff Ireeaf 101 tot
J 11411ti lrfeese t a e a
life fltcltit [CSI 11,111 a It f 211,r 1 s 3f 1 M us
1 { lem + 111,133
SI
II
II Co1C441111 at liftoff lterttlc [little
I
N 12,301 a IIf{fl1lI71,112-3,101111.1131 a ISl,iif t 1.11lhlllJl.l•llltll a IO 1 11,11'1
It lital tote semi rile lately Ines) Ieuaf Ncililf
II rote lilt Cast rate Clete
II bbd mod 1011toest
21 I ICA I
21 e '
11
13 Coloolalifa if 1011111 N 11441ttirttt lone!
11 Allied as 60.411161loes Ott state atroglinl
if
11 trio flpr Ik, I IIrIF 1141 J 12 f 21,{11 t 1, If a IISI 1 A test) 1 I1f1
if Ito1 tiger 1[11{ 1113 I It a II,NI I MIS t ItoI I L furl f III?
at
11cl1drt
NCY14t1
Clarfe Met. 1102111 + 113J1t
late I1: Set lerenhtt rtonrfort lest parties of elltel fee tillage etperloo to It leurltel It We 1pll.ut tort Cu It ltu0ull)
slttlletel Is 111nltnrtl14 A111desrt.
G
1
1
~I
1
.Td Ri'Y
t 101 1 fn}fellfyc tare alalluNtellcwwlc 1n11rsu -..Afl Narrative
Um
. .M. Number
I h firf leer arUfiU Roder it sum and IN" financial I
f
"stitutlonl. I lookr tern Itnool sold Witt halms reliatilitr.
i Cowtruct3co cwt is "Batt" bf otilitr kkrtam staff.
It inland" finder costs glw 49 for Dekrtkot idamstrati".
it Call lorries it oftdiul" of a It anaWl prigcikl Daiwa% am
a I. it &MIMI Inu mi palm.
IS Iftorl k lo►mo"t to the G ril Fo" is orediclud at an
4". noo•fommo it of coostructios cast.
It (Vital cwt Foul if co"od of Debt Smite olus hours of
a
I neltk,t.
11 11"lits loul is comm" of:
preponf III Remove
Sales lit know fr":
omdwu 1M larrim
elptotew' di""Ull toeok
toottreetia "serials' oarcuao
.Itility Revenue
Nape I InlfiltrVCturt lanluAClIFc0101ra Inaifiis Nod11 Nuratiff it
ti"
Muster
1 Frokrtr fat havnlee is oredicaud on ld,si kr 11" of toolicoet,g plant. J
orourtt, aM "mom Id". It is I F ,A that 151 of UU rowm Pill
W timllf attribdtablt to the finally jamient's h"al"es. Ilov dollar
ralk of this kreseude is nor""tol by lit Rot tofu! 111 Fen.
i
11 Sol" III Room frof the uodliti is local "it of oredepu aM soffit" Is oredial" of 11.01
kr 1101 toe" "la. It to IPO,etil that 151 of this 11"11 till
be olfictlf attriloulld to the dtilltf ketrum s Ur"u"t. IN dollar
filet of this off"Rtgl is reprdtento by I% Mt ioe"1 lac ton.
im 111#1 far hrefe frog lloloum II or1114111 04 1 diso"rile
IKM factor of 4". It Is elwte/ this It lust in of tha
upliesat's Ioolgea Pill life it into INd that loch ON of me
1411wr"il"I I"I fill. in lm. k,lnto too Amito"l ke•rufs of feolofom for
othar 0!noN~r"tan eoolore".
i
i
FkM
~eee J Inlrutrectrl aslttacelfeoAOUt Iaalrlts noon Iarratn
(IM
, Cute/...
1
I Was to 11nnw frog Cagtrfettof U oreplutk ON 101 of the
OrAlecl'I Colt DIJAO alga" Of toastroctl(M Ottertail ane Ill
o} thole alterlall Delay purCUS41 It $$Out.
1 CIICtl11110f of smuly fleciflc rlvlafl it Dffdl"tld af the electric ,
COMM1101 Of as flutlAQ Ipoliuat facllltf of liatlu sill. IMI n
loci facility flifu. cmmtln it Need Ol the mliult'l Imadus or the
fleilitf'I 1111. iAUNN use. Igelplaft. Ind Ilfctflut Sytill Onllp. 4
the Co4triDetiss to lour$ at limtlest (1011 pucle," rgornalt IN 00ftij of
the aoolicoat's 1113eioatd chlity afafou that gill Accm to the 101.
a
1S Ilatlric Service Ilil nhrsally be Oravlded to an loollult Order the Afftefll
SlrnCI 103) rill 104dole. under this Icalefle. tM first ISII JMI's art Dllled
at .Oak eeou per Cal all adeltioal III's Ire Dtlled it the rite of .01S cost
oar M. II ldditiol. all in,I are 0111N at IN laffey Colt adtltafll 11C111 fall
of .lit mu per Im will 0essed is owl 10 the si "st If Mafl denap
is rpistnd of 1 cvstmr'l dobfe after aid u. DJIIN It the rate of p.11
car M. Ile IAcJiri► charge it 121 pa 11 Uys of service.
26 CaIcolatioa of Mull Blur ronofo is NOW of the
I
later Conoafllaf It am 11Jstiq 010liaft facility Of luillr Ills. Ih11
a0 IRO facility 1111h, coalastiol is kom ON the maptiuli's 'ltimus or the 1
facility's OlsiOo. intod no, led egelfafft.
later leryice fill atonal pf Drofidd to af Iopliant alder tai taafreiallledntrill
(MCI rite Icledele nlaq, for ion"" of toll "J. a I' tut later. Yadlr this Ickpole.
III later gallon fro IJllee 11 14 tau of 12.01 per loci 1,001 V11aaa. IM
facility Carle for A I' after IS 120 her JI days of surico. ~
IM Caatrileulf to Were af Iftmtmt 1101) Imes" r/orneou the oortio/ of
the OtllicAlt's asticiat" stilitf haysslu that sill larva to the 101.
11 calcllatioo of eoftllf sent rllanee is pall ON the assliult'i Otter conNOtiol.
!(aff Iona fill Milli? III lrgfiled to IN &NlifAfl M*f the
taoarcialllMlltrul 11211 rate IeMdflss. I111f the Ill selodela.
alp Wallistah"ger low o1110n1~ 0Oro 11ledleglthe rite IN
11.3 car loch mull
OIJIM. IN
facility cuffe is 11.21 afr JO days Of lung.
IM taftrihetiel to Attm of INMU441 11011 Nrtlaw "Onafsto the miss of
IN Issliaot's aftieiafted utility o+lonu that fill Access to Sal 101.
P
.
APPLICATION FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ASSISTANCE
Cnmpa~ty Name:
Address;
Telephcne:(
Contact Person:
Title:
Telephone;
Nature of
Businesa;
Years in Business;
N of Facilities Nationally:
N of Facilities in Texas:
Type of Facility;
Nearest Similar Facility;
Are You Considering Other Locations Besides Denton?: yes
if yes, where: No
1
Maier Factors that will Influence
Your Decision:
PROPOSED FACILITY
Location of Denton Site:
Site Acreages
If no, at what sta---..~ Have You Acquired Site?: yes
go is acquisition?: No
Square Footage of Facility:
Number of Buildings:
- Type of Construction:
Estimated Value of Constructions
Anticipated Construction Start:
Completions
Anticipated Opening ~
Date:
EXHIBIT
a
r:
EMFLOYMENT
Initial Size of Labor Force: Anticipated Payroll: s
(All employees)
Eventual Size of Labor Forces Anticipated Payroll: S
(All employees)
Types of Employees:
(production, etc.)
Number of Employees to be Recruited from Denton:
Payroll of Denton Recruits S
UTILITIES
Facility's Hours of Operation (M - F)s
(Sat
Electric: (Sun !s
Anticipated Kilowatt Hours (KWH):
(If available, submit actual conlumpt on from similar facility)
Anticipated Demand:
(If not available, what will be your. electric system's design?)
What Type of Power Equipment will Your Facility Utilize?:
(Include HVAC size, etc.)
water/Wastewaters
Anticipated Water Consumptions gallons pe:
(If available, submit actual consumption from similar facility)
Peak Water Consumptions gallons per hour
what portion of your water consumption will be discharged as runoff
(lawn sprinkler system, etc.)?s gallons per
Anticipated Fire Flow Requirements?: Gallons Per Minute
427
y City of Denton City Council Minutes
April 3, 1990
Page 3 '
A checklist had been provided of materials and information
needed by staff. Staff would be reviewing the list for any
1 changes that might be necessary such as eliminating some
t requirements.
Mayor Pro Tem Ayer asked if the new GIS equipment might help
with some of the needed information,
Robbins replied yes after all the information were imputed.
Council Member Gorton asked if a conflict came up between a
builder and an inspector regarding a set of plans, was there
one individual who would render a decision regarding the plans.
Robbins stated that the plans would have to be inspected
according to the approved plans.
Council Member Hopkins stated that she had a list of
requirements that the City required that no one else required.
She asked that as the process was refined, could staff go to a
mestin/ of the Builder's Association to explain the process,
Mayor Stephens asked if a check had been made of other cities
to see if they were streamlining their process, particularly
Lewisville as they had just updated t'eir system,
Council Member McAdams stated that it would be better if the
process took two weeks if it wotre right than for it to take
four days and be wrong,
Council Member Boyd stated that the rules needed to be
understood by all and that they be applied uniformly and
consistently,
5. The Council held a discussion regarding proposed
changes in policy for candidate water/sewer lines.
Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, reviewed the
background information on the policy. The Land Use Planning
Committee developed a concept of balanced growth - not only
geographically but also between residential and industrial
concept in The which Public differelnt Utility Board rdwould devised be looked 0at 00and year
money would be available to help industrial customers or some
type of development. Out of that process, a whole list of
J criteria and schedules were developed, it was felt that the
guidelines became quite complicated and unworkable. The Public
Utilities Board was suggesting the following policies: (1)
during its annual review of the Utility Department's Capital
Improvements Plan, the Board would consider the allocation of
3500,000 for the construction of candidate water and/or sewer
lines to serve only industrial prospects which had committed to
~ '
EXHIBIT
f JF
T L V
City of ,3enton city council minutes
April 3, 1990
i Page 4
building facilities in Denton, (2) the City of Dent uuld
to OO dopleadpolicy of 'responding' to growth rather than at.,upting
E a
growth, (3) all candidate water and sewer lines would
be submitted to the Public Utilities Board to be considered on
M a case-by-case basis, (4) only those candidate water and sewer
lines which would serve an industrial prospect which had
committed to building facilities within the Clty of Denton,
Texas, would be considered, (5) the Public Utilities Board
' would prescribe and obtain from each industrial prospect
appropriate evidence of the prospects commitment to building
facilities within the CIty of Denton, Texas, (6) upon review of
such evidence of commitment, the Public Utilities Board might
recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that funds be
made available to provide water and/or sewer service to the
prospect's facilities, (7) annual funding, through the Capital
Improvements Plan, in the amount of $500,000 for the
construction of candidate water and sewer lines would be
continued, but the cumulative total of such funding would not
exceed $2 million at any time. These proposals had not yet
been to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Council member Gorton asked about keeping some money for
non-industrial purposes,
Nelson replied that $150,000 would be
Improvements Plan for non-industrial purposesld in the Capital
Council Member McAdams suggested that the wording
'lead'/'follow' might not be.appropriate, She fell. that the
intent was to be able to respond to a proposed development. rt
was not proposed that sewer/waver lines would be developed in
advance, in anticipation of future development. The funding
ability was needed to be available so that when a prospect came
along, negotiations could be done.
Mayor Pro Tom Ayer stated that he had reservations about the
proposal as it proposed very substantial changes in policy. He
was concerned about the change as he felt the concept of
balanced/compact growth was a valuable one and should be
the report ofethe sLanaso concerned d use Planning tTasktForce was which he didtnot
want to see abandoned.
Nelson replied that the concept was still there. It was saying
that the money was available but instead of trying to put it in
the ground where nothing existed and no commitments existed, it
J was making the money available.
The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers.
{
I
1
1
E ~
I
1
MI-~NUTES_ PLAN LINE - MAY 31 1990 7;40 AM
rn Attendance:
Robert E. Nelson, P.E., Executive Director of Utilities
'r C,ran DkaviRodbbn Hi&n-nsP.E., Director of Water/Wastewater Utilities
F, Executive Director of Planning/Community Develop.
Robert Thompson, Member, Public Utilities Board
Mark Chew, Member, Public Utilities Board
Jim Engelbrecht, Member, Planning and Zoning Commission
Ivan Glasscock, Member, Planning and Zoning Commission
Frank Robbins opened the meeting by passing out handouts (1) of the
City Development Guide pertaining to Utilities and (2) the Water and
Sewer L14as Guidelines used for determining priorities of eligible
candidates.
Frank Robbins and Robert Nelson recapped the history of the candidate
line concept and how the guidelines had failed to attract new business
into Denton.
Several ideas were introduced by the Public Utilities Board members:
a) The !500400 (S250400 for water/$2509000 for sewer) would
be lset aside each year for .tted ir,du~at~l candidates
Y
b) Unencumbered funds would be allowed to grow to not more
than a total of $2,000,000.
c) These monies would be used to follow growth, not to lead
growth.
Robert Nelson also introduced an economic model to be used to evaluate
the benefits of a committed industrial prospect. Payback of benefits
to the City of Denton must exceed projected capital costs of
construction over five years. The payback of benefits accruing to this
I investment would be calculated as followst
i a) 251 of ad valorum tax on prospects' property
b) 251 of sales tax on prospects' Denton sales & services
c) 1001 of construction sales tax
d) prospects' electric consumption payments
contribution to return on investment - 31
e) Prospects' water consumption payments
contribution to return on investment - 81
EXHIBIT V1
i
I
f) Prospects'
return on wastewater payments contribution to
investment - 121
g) Each of prospects' employees can be expected to
generate two additional Denton employees
h) 50% of prospects' employees and 50% of additional
employees can be expected to reside In Denton
1) 25% sales tax of employees disposable income
I j) disposable income equals 40% of total income
` kl Candidates would be handled on a first come, first
1 served basis.
A general discussion followed in which there was no consensus of
opinion, A follow u P Po
established and the staff tcould areturnwithwaeproposed dQanda could be
could be written into an ordinance. Pkn which
Meeting adjourned at 8130 A.M.
2DH098.DOC
i
k
I
I
Minutes
Infrastructure Financing lommltteP Meeting
ruesdav, July lU, 1,ju
i:UU A.M.
Committee Members In Attendance:
I
John Thompson - Public Utilities Board
Mark Chew - Public Utilities Board
i Jim Englebrecht - Planning and Zoning Commission
Ivan Glasscock - Planning and Zoning Commission
Start' Members in Attendance:
Bob Nelson - Executive Director of Utilities
Frank Robbins - Executive Director of Planninq
i Dave Ham - Director, water/Wastewater Utilities
I Joseph ialenti - Administrative Assistant. Water/Wastewater
Utilities
I
F The meeting began with a review of the Economic Analysis
model. At Bob Nelson's request, Joe Ialenti walked the
Committee members through the model.
Jim Englebrecht asked about the origin of the various
percentages that were used In the model to calculate tax
revenue benefits. He also wanted to know how start
determined that 9U% of any new prospect's emplovees would
reside in Denton. He stated his concern that the uubitc
aight also ask such questions and staff should be prevared
to back up any percentages used in the model, Crank Robbins
responded that staff might be able to document these
percentages: however, whatever percentages were used, the
same percentages would be applied each time an analysis
was done.
John Thompson was concerned that a large industrial utility
consumer such as Matsushita might require expenditures for
Denton's construction or additional utility capacity such
as an expanded water plant. Bob Nelson admitted that was a
possibility, but stated that It was not accounted for In the
J model. Such an expenditure would need special handling and
approval,
The Committee accepted the Funding policy, but suggessted
changes to the Selection policy and the application process,
Jim Englebrecht questioned the definition of value-added
goods as used in the Selection policy. Since no definition
could be agreed upon, that term was replaced with one
referring to goods previously manufactured elsewhere, but
consumed In Denton,
f Y.'J 'O Kqc yf~(
! rai■i
u r+.x
Minutes
r Infrastructure Financing Committee Meeting
A Page C
Y John Thompson wanted to know it service industries would be
eligible for funding. The Committee agreed to include
specific policy language permitting funding for corporate
headquarters. Mr. Thompson also thought that the
Infrastructure policy should be available not oniy to new
local industries, but also to existing local industries that
were expanding in Denton.
The Committee recommended that the intermittment
disbursement of Intrastructure funds be permitted as
construction work on the subJect utility lines progressed.
There was much discussion concerning the chronology of Board
and Commission reviews and recommendations. Frank Robbins
presented an alternative chronology In which the PtB
forwarded its recommendation to P 6 Z which, in turn,
forwarded its recommendation and the Board's recommendation
to the City Council. The Committee accepted this chronology.
The Committee next considered the policy's suggested waiver
of that provision of the Sub-Division ordinance requiring
the construction of utility lines across the tronta(e of a
prospect's property. John Thompson thought that the model
should include the cost of this frontage infrastructure even
if the requirement were waived. Dave Nam explained that the
the financing of infrastructure to the edge of the
prospect's property was a.- Incentive for the prospect, To
then require that the prospect spend its own nonev to extend
utility lines across its frontage trom their property edge
would effectively remove that incentive,
Mark Chew requested that the Committee meet again on July
20, 1990 at 7:UU A.M to review the policy after the
suggested changes had been made.
is
I I
1
E
1
EXCERPT OR
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD 4r
MINUTES
July 23, 1990
7. REVIEW AND CONSIDER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING POLICY.
Nelson introduced this item and advised that John Thompson
( and M?rk Chew were members of the task force that roviewed
the policy and are trying to develop a new infrastructure
financing policy. Essentially the new policy provides that
the Utility still return $500,000 each year to the program
however, instead of doing an analysis, staff waits for a
potential customer to apply and then looks at various
criteria. Three types of customers will be consideredi 1)
industrial committed prospects, 2) industrial/retail
building in the city but selling outside the city, and 3)
` commercial retail operations manufacturing items sold in
fk Denton. The staff will determine the feasibility of
extending lines, the cost of the lino, a five, year payout on
the line, cost vs benefits, (253 of ad valorum tax base, 251
sales tax, etc.), revenues normally attributable to return
on investment portion of our electric, water and wastewater,
etc. If there is a positive net cash flow, then the project
will be recommended.
The applicant will do the work and the city pays after a
certificate of acceptance is issued. Tho customer is then
directed to the Economic Development office and they present
the positive issues about the city. Staff then begins to
work with the rest of the city organizations, i.e., Public
Utilities Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission and
after that, these two recommendations will be forwarded to
the City Council.
Frady asked if any changes were made to the proposal by the
Planning and Zoning Commission, would the Board be rotlfled
before the item was sent to the City Council. Nelson
k replied that any changes relating to the dollar amounts
would require that the Board again review the item. Laney
expressed a desire for the P&Z to look at traffic patterns, j
etc., before final approval of these projects.
After general discussion, LaForte made a motion to recommend
--J to the City Council acceptance of the policy as presented.
Second by Chew. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. i
EXHIBIT.
CITY
COUNCIL
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
FFFF
Q
41
O~O~ roe t' Opv\
'7I°~o~~cuccaa~
r
i ~~r t
7
1{~
I
+r _+w
f August 21, 1990
I
t
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
RE: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF REQUEST BY FOREST HILL NO. 2 WATER
SUPPLY CORP., TO RECEIVE CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY (CCN) FOR WATER SERVICE TO 34 CUSTOMERS
LOCATED ON 50 ACRES IN DENTON'S EXTRATERRITORIAL
JURISDICTION (ETJ) NORTHEAST OF THE CITY.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Hoard, at their meeting of July 23,
1990, recommended to the City Council that the City not
oppose dual certification provided certain construction
standards are followed on all future construction and that
dual certification is limited to the prescribed area.
SUMMARY
Forest Hill No. 2 Water Supply Corp., presently serves water
to 34 residential water customers located on 50 acres of
property in Denton's ETJ northeast of the City and south of
Hartlee Field Road and Airport. Forest Hill has served this
area since its beginnings several years ago but had not
previously secured a CCN as r.quired by State law. They are
now seeking a CCN due :o requirements of lending
institutions.
The Denton Utility system is not presently serving in t;:e
area, but is located approximately one mile south at McNair
Elementary School. The City agreed to a dual certification
J with the Oak Bend development several years ago which is
located between the McNair School and Forest Hill area,
{
I
1
e
1'.WM• !OM
I
i W ~k."Il'11~
I
Forest H111 No. 2 Water Supply Corp.
Page 2
t
The S:aff recommends that the City not oppose the dual
certification provided Forest Hill No. 2 Water Supply Corp.,
constructs all future additions to tbgir system to the same
standards as the City. This will aseire a good system that
will not be a costly burden to other rate payers in the
` nvent of future a:ne..9tIon of this area into the City.
t FISCAL SUMMARY
` Not applicable
Respect lly submitted,
4
Lloyd V. Harrell, C y
Manager
Pre ared/Ap roved by: x
s
elson, Executive Director
Department of Utilities
'I
Exhibit I Notice of Application,
II Location Map
i
III Minutes of PUB Meeting of 7/23/90
I 1
j
I
u rt s+n
i
n ..fV
NOTICE OF AN APPLIC&TION FILED WITH THE
TEXAS WATER COMMISSION FOR A CONVE CERTIFIPROVIDE WATERNUTILITYNSERVICE~JITY TO
18 July 90
Mr. Robert F. Nelson
Executive Director of Utilities
CITY OF DENTON
215 East McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
FOREST HILL NO. TWO WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION has filed an
application for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity with
the Texas }dater TCommission he provide 1/2
Denton County.
' miles northeast of downtown Denton, Texas, and generally buunded
on the north by Hartlee Field Road, on the south by Oak Bend
Subdivision and on the east and west sides by certain tracts of
land; the subdivision is generally divided down the middle by
Colioximaircle5e street. an The total area being requested includes
app
Persons who wish to Intervene or comment sheixld write the-. Rates
Section, Water Utilities Division, THUS MATER COMMISSION, P.O.
Box 13087, Capitol Station, Austin, Texan 78711-3087 within
thirty (30) days from the date of this publication or notice. No
public hearing will be held unless a req+xest for hearing is
received. Only those individuals who submit a written request to
be notified of a hearing schedule will receive notice if a
Loaring is scheduled.
EXHIBIT108:
1
i
we,ca a~
• Y
♦fY r
Mr. Robert E. Nelson
Executive Director of Utilities
CITY OF DENTON
215 East McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Date: -
Rates Section
Water Utility Division
TEXAS WATER COMMISSION
P.O. Box 130870 Capitol Station
Austin, TX 78711-3087
RE: APPLICATION FILE IHILL NO. TWO WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION R A CCN
1
This is to Inform the Texas Water Commission that the
at a
day of _ - , 1990 agreed to
meeting the
dually certify certain areas within its current water utility
service area.
The service area affected is the entire Forest Hill No. Two
south ivoision and the Mitchell
Subd
the Subdivision, DentonrCounty,, y,eTexanly adjacent to and
I
Thank you very much.
For City of Denton
cc: Texas Water Company Route 5, Box 139-A Denton, TX 76201
't
a {
I Cm urY+, f ; r ~ . .N/ t1
r\I Iw 1
14
wens ,
«tap .14r itrr YW1 , \
_ M aaucw. Irrw ` 1 - Max.;
- v : M 14 W1'OMI .Ircu S 3 ~rP.rVr'ft~` a
e I a wuo
S{ rr Inun I i ` UMM F
e { /InMOl7o~a i'~-~-_ ~2ML uu»_ ~~yy
!e
1 1 w„'aIJO yr 4 • ~~I~II . w / NIM OU4_ 11`u'r~W~Mr
O..Mrnw 16■.rlt ~ttq ~ ~ 1 yI„ t■ .
/ar/I/lw~ I t ~ ~ I. fM~ •
YUIY►arilw d ii I
MIL
e 7
x.sr r
ron ~~a i~ 'n~~~ I n u r n ~-R!I~il. 1 r
xI,•.._ r< f uvl0~ ~{I{ I. qa 1 alY vf~Iu
meak"
To la~
Mbl
I w-~~eu w a 710
;
coo:
M"
~alg oasYlll 711
• a 1 WAIF ~
M~ M • I 1 I . I IIAa w
O` 7i
1 it
' yy. Xl f M .x. M,S1~
+.71 ~ a~gSL1~
MP\ -
e " ■
' 0 aa1 ~ ~ s aTKhYi~ !1!5
7 9 wlearl • rrul I'mo` will l e pbl I
' rrb 1 ® M 1
426
Y Y 1
1
r ~ b
/ I
.rr
1 ~
6 I Y
ire ~
EXHIBIT
1 i
i
r~
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
OTHER ACTION BY THE BOARD
7/23/90
#9 CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A REQUEST BY FOREST HILL *10. 2 WATER
SUPPLY CORP. TO CERTIFICATE ONVENIENCE AND
? NECESSITY FOR WATER SERVICE TO LOCATED ON 50
ACRES N DE NTON'S EXTRATERRITORIASN NORTHEAST OF
THE CITY.
o. 2
Nelson introduced this im Supply Corporation cannotsobtainalendingtunHill lessNdual
Water Sup upp y
certification is received in their water service area.
Thompson asked how close Denton's water system is to this
area. Martin advised that we have a line at Hodge Elementary
School, but there is considerable distance from that
location to this one.
After general discussion, Laney made a motion to recommend buildi approval of subject request
ithprovidingDenton building
construction is done to comply LaPorte. All ayes, no nays, motion
codes. Second d by by
carried.
M I
i
r I
I
l n..V. M1 F°RHid~
I .
PiZ Minutes DRAFT
August 8, 1990
Page 4
Iv. consider policy relating to the city extension of city water
er and wastewater lines to economic development candidates.
Mr. Robbins narrated the history of the policy saying that
when the Denton Development Plan (DDP) was adopted there was
an economic growth incentive policy that provided for utility
extension at City cost. The ranking criteria for these
"crndidate" lines was found to be problematic, indicating
lines In parts of the City where economic growth was already
sufficient. Also, the policy set aside money to help *hot
prospects" for six months of the year. If the money was not
spent in six months, it was to be used for a candidate line.
Candidate lines are for areas where the City might want to
have lines in the future. Therefore, if a hot prospect
appeared after the six month period, the City would be unable
to provide economic incentive. Also, extending lines to
vacant land where there is no interest would create a rate
increase. The Public utilities Board (PUB) has recommended
only extending lines to hot prospects. A now set of criteria
is included with the new policy. Mr. Glasscock and Mr.
Engelbrecht have been on the committee working on this now
policy. The policy is that during its annual review of the
Utility Department's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), the PUS
shall consider the allocation of up to $500,000 annually to
finance the construction of infrastructure water and/or sewer
lines. This allocation shall consist of $250,000 from the
Water CIP and $750,000 from the Wastewater CIP.
Infrastructure financing shall be provided only to:
1) industrial fin which have committed to building
facilities in Denton
2) commercial/retail prospects which have committed to
building facilities in Denton and which:
a) moll a majority of their goods or services to
individuals or businesses outside of Denton,m
and/or
b) manufacture goods for consumption in Denton which
were previously manufactured outside of Denton
3) Corporate headquarters prospects which have committed to
building facilities in Denton.
For purposes of the economic analysis:
l i
Project costs shell consist of 1001 of:
+ debt service associated with the subject utility line's
construction, and
I '
+ return on investment associated with the completed
subject utility line.
Project benefits shall consist of 251 of:
+ revenue from ad valorem tax on prospect's local property,
plant, and equipment
+ revenue from sales tax on prospect's products and
services sold by the Denton facility
+ revenue from sales tax on local purchases by the Denton-
resident labor force generated by prospect's locating in
Denton
and 1001 of:
I
II
1
f
I
)'4vR
P&Z Mi "AFT
Augustn8, 1990 D
Page 5
revenue from sales tax on prospect's local purchase of
its facility's construction materials
V + revenue from that portion of the prospect's local
consumption of Denton utilities that is contributed
toward the return on investment.
Ms. Brock asked what will be the return on the City's
investment.
Mr. Robbins replied that the Utility Department pays into the
general fund an amount equal to 61 of the capital cost of the
investment. When a line is built, 61 of the cost goes to the
general fund. This is done in lieu of fees or taxes.
Ms. Brock asked how the 251 figure was determined.
Mr. Robbins answered that it is an average that relates to
kinds of services. the cost is actually a little less than
what they are paying. 251 is a general number that will keep
things simple.
Mr. Engelbrecht noted that the committee working on the policy
asked the PUB to monitor the numbers and try to enhance them
over time.
Mr. Robbins continued that funds shall be disbursed to the
prospect or the prospect's designee only as follows:
1) upon presentation of a Certificate of Occupancy for the
prospect's Denton facility, or
I
2) in intermittent payments as construction of the subject
utility line progresses.
The commission reviewed the proposed policy and related
formulas.
Mo. Brock commented that one council member was concerned
about balanced growth. If a request for a line was made in an
area that would distort growth patterns, would the Commission
be able to recommend that no City-funded extensions be made?
Mr. Robbins said yes. The request could be denied on a policy
basis or in conjunction with a coning case.
Ms. Brock asked what if the site was coned properly and the
City just did not want to use City funds?
i
Mr. Engelbrecht explained that the proposed policy addresses
the economic aspects of extension, not land use. The process
for approving extensions will be that PUB will make a
recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission, which
will in turn make a recommendation to the City Council. The
Commission would look at the policy and then apply it in terms
of the DDP. The PUB recommendation will be based on sconoa!c
viability.
Mr. Glasscock moved to recommend approval of the policy
relating to the city extension of city water and wastewater
lines to economic development candidates. Seconded by Mr.
Engelbrecht and unanimously carried (6-0).
{
I
J
i
erx sar~
~YI.t1^ve 0n^1c♦~
CITY
COUNCIL
~~60000 0
4 A
O ` o
BOO H
~ o
OV tiro t t+tJ~`\
~~~aCCC~OG00~0
i
I
i
i
e
I
0
A ro CITY of DENTON / 215 E. McKinney / Denton, Texas 76201
' MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 17, 1990
T0: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager
FROM: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance
SUBJECT: JULY BUDGET RECAP
E
It seems as though lately all the attention is focused on the
1990-41 budget. However, the current year budget is now over 10
months eld and 'here is not much change from that which was
reported in jr -comprehensive 9 months report.
There is still concern over sales tax receipts. The month of
July showed receipts of $585,913.00 which did not increase over
last years amount of $587,345.00 but decreased by $1,428.00.
Although other areas of the budget have offset some of this
loss, there is still concern in the same type of areas as
reported in the past, especially in the building areas. Total
revenues through July were $24,101,387.00 which is 901 of the
budget. This compares to $22,234,233.00 for the same period
last year.
The expenditure side of the general fund is under budget at 791
with expenses and encumbrances incurred through the end of
July. If this pace keeps up, the general fund as was reported
in the 9 month report should come well under budget, which
s should help offset some of the decrease in revenues.
If you have any questions or need any further information,
please advise.
J6hn F. McGrane
JFMcGh jh
5354F
jFp■■
f
I A..
t
r
i
I
f '
FILE
_J
a